T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2100.1 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Jun 14 1993 14:13 | 14 |
| Ian,
There has been a recent discussion on this in note 331.106 onwards.
In .106 I touched on the idea that Vauxhalls maybe the preferred car.
I had heard that this was an idea being considered.
If they do change things in this way I hope a little notice is given
beforehand rather than a statement that any cars on order will be
cancelled sorry folks you've got to have a Vauxhall.
Perhaps this discussion does warrant a note of its own.
Royston
|
2100.2 | No way | MUGGER::POWELL | | Mon Jun 14 1993 16:45 | 11 |
|
If this does happen I'll leave the company.....
The car scheme is one of the few reasons for staying these days, job
content is the other. However with all other aspects having been eroded
the past few years this would be the last straw. Sorry Digital but
thats how it is.
G.P
|
2100.3 | Maybe there'll be an announcement this week. | CMOTEC::JASPER | | Mon Jun 14 1993 16:55 | 1 |
|
|
2100.4 | Maybe deliberate policy? | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Mon Jun 14 1993 18:02 | 11 |
| re .2;
Graham, I understand your views.
Now, in my cynical way of viewing life, the universe and everything, maybe
this is a way to further p**s people off, so they leave of their own
accord, thereby saving redundancy payoffs.
But I'm sure Digital would never do such a thing...
Peter.
|
2100.5 | Also Mr Cynical | WOTVAX::FIDDLERM | This is the Winter of your Mind | Mon Jun 14 1993 18:03 | 4 |
| Hmmm...wonder if they will apply some kinds of standards to the
question of who gets Car Allowances...
Mikef
|
2100.6 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Jun 14 1993 18:41 | 5 |
| I reckon it's all rumour. I *really* can't see them having the bottle
to do this, unless as Peter said they are trying to halve the
workforce!!!!
Greg
|
2100.7 | constructive dismissal is illegal | TRUCKS::BUSHEN_P | Reproduced without protection | Mon Jun 14 1993 18:43 | 15 |
| >
>Now, in my cynical way of viewing life, the universe and everything, maybe
>this is a way to further p**s people off, so they leave of their own
>accord, thereby saving redundancy payoffs.
>
this is called "constructive dismissal" and is ILLEGAL if you suspect Digital
bring it up with your manager, if you do leave (feeling you had no choice) take
the company to an industrial tribunal
cheers,
/8-P
(who has looked into this, what with certain past events)
|
2100.8 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Jun 14 1993 19:23 | 15 |
| In the current climate, if Digital can save BIG bucks by radically
changing the car scheme then that is good news for the company.
If your package includes a company car then legally the company should
provide you with a car of a certain value (Cavalier 1.6 ?) or the
equivilent in cash (ie opting out of the scheme).
The fact that we have a complete free choice of vehicle and pay the
extra if more expensive than the allowance is a bonus.
The logical thing to do if there are big savings to be made by
having cars supplied by one manufacturer is go for it but still allow
us to get quotes and pay extra for the car of our choice.
Royston
|
2100.9 | BCC allow FORD only!!!! | ALBURT::LEWIS | | Mon Jun 14 1993 19:27 | 9 |
| The idea of restricting your choice of car to one particular
manufacture seems to becoming increasingly popular with company car
fleets, my farther who works for Berkshire County Council is just about
to renew his company car, and has been told any car you want as long as
its a FORD, perivously he was allowed any car he wanted from any
manufacture, so its not just digital doing it.
Neil
|
2100.10 | | LARVAE::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, TSE - Technology Services, End-User Computing | Mon Jun 14 1993 19:53 | 2 |
| At least if they say any model as long as its a Vauxhall will mean
fewer will leave than if they say "any model as long as its a Ford"
|
2100.11 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Jun 14 1993 19:54 | 25 |
| >>If your package includes a company car then legally the company should
>>provide you with a car of a certain value (Cavalier 1.6 ?) or the
>>equivilent in cash (ie opting out of the scheme).
That's exactly what happens in Digital. They take three cars per level,
then work out the cost, and that is what the allowance is. I saw the
figures for last year, I think the base level was based on a Cavalier
1.6 and a Sierra, and AN OTHER.
>>The fact that we have a complete free choice of vehicle and pay the
>>extra if more expensive than the allowance is a bonus.
Yep, but I doubt it would be cheaper to have a one manufact. scheme.
>> The logical thing to do if there are big savings to be made by having
>> cars supplied by one manufacturer is go for it but still allow us to
>> get quotes and pay extra for the car of our choice.
they virtually do this now don't they? I mean they can ring up Vauxhall
and say 'last year we bought x Vauxhalls, so what price will you give
us to put on our fixed price list?
Greg
|
2100.12 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Mon Jun 14 1993 20:06 | 5 |
| I still can't see what's wrong with my formula idea.
It would certainly cut admin costs.
Ian
|
2100.13 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Jun 14 1993 20:20 | 6 |
2100.14 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Mon Jun 14 1993 20:25 | 5 |
| WHat he meant is that it's not just Digital who allow you
to choose any car. That's how I read it anyway.
Ian
|
2100.15 | | ALBURT::LEWIS | | Mon Jun 14 1993 20:52 | 6 |
| re:-1 Yes that is the point that I am trying to make, but also that
other companys have also looked into and some even changed their policy
from any car any manufacture to any car made by Joe Bloggs only. So it
could happen.
Neil
|
2100.16 | It should be cheaper.... should be! | WOTVAX::HATTOS | I think, Therefore I'm paid less | Tue Jun 15 1993 18:02 | 17 |
|
IF the company goes to a single manufacturer, and that manufacturer
was Vauxhall, it should come as no great surprise.
Back in January I think there was a bit in the financial press about
General Motors taking a 40% share in a certain leading Fleet Management
group.
So, not only would the company be going sole manufacturer, they would
also be going sole supplier.
As far being cheaper, well potentially it should be. If General Motors
are supplying the vehicles they get General Motors discounts on
servicing, tyres, exhausts, batteries... etc.
If you didn't guess ......... PHH
Stuart
|
2100.17 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Tue Jun 15 1993 18:16 | 4 |
| How can we find out the "official" word?
Ian
|
2100.18 | | BAHTAT::DODD | | Tue Jun 15 1993 18:38 | 11 |
| Bear in mind IBM started a schem of Vauxhall only unless the driver
pays a premium for whatever car they choose. Personally it would depend
how big the premium was for going away from the preferred supplier as
to how unhappy I felt. I would think Ford, Vauxhall and Rover were the
only real possibilities.
I'm sure it will come next Fiscal - and soon.
Andrew
PS I would expect the official word before the end of the fiscal.
|
2100.19 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Tue Jun 15 1993 19:17 | 19 |
2100.20 | Is this 'official' enough? | TENTO1::BOURNEJ | EASYEDIT rules ok (G6JJK) | Tue Jun 15 1993 20:39 | 8 |
2100.21 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Tue Jun 15 1993 20:49 | 5 |
| Did he say what other ideas were being actively looked
into?
Ian
|
2100.22 | Hot News | NEWOA::CROME_A | | Tue Jun 15 1993 23:48 | 17 |
| Well as you have all probably found out by now the car scheme is changing.
ONE VENDOR !!!
It was inevitable really, but at least they are not stopping us from
choosing "any" other car - just making us pay for it !
So my bets are with Vauxhall ( which suits me ) and for those of you who
cant bear to be seen in the chosen vendors car - you will just have to pay the
price - egg on my face if its FORD !!!!
Andy
Could be worse..
SKODA's all round........... - Nahh ! Company image to think of !
|
2100.23 | At least Skoda's are rear wheel drive... | ESBS01::WATSON | Rik Watson (7) 782 2238 | Wed Jun 16 1993 11:32 | 1 |
|
|
2100.24 | Keep on squeezing ... | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Wed Jun 16 1993 12:24 | 13 |
2100.25 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Wed Jun 16 1993 12:59 | 11 |
| The way I read it was that there is very little change.
You can choose a car from the preferred manufacturer, or
from another manufacturer and pay the difference. Surely
the employee contribution will vary from a Corsa to a
Senator or Carlton.
I guess we have to wait till July 1st to understand what
the REAL changes are.
Ian
|
2100.26 | | ESBS01::WATSON | Rik Watson (7) 782 2238 | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:07 | 4 |
| Oh well, I wonder how may people will be getting Lotus Carltons for co.
cars ?
Rik
|
2100.27 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:14 | 14 |
| It doesn't say you pay "the difference", it says you pay the "additional
incremental costs".........my reading of this, is that if they need
3 people to process all the additional quotes for those who put them in,
then this will be factored across the people who take a car outside
the basket, in addition to the extra lease cost.
I don't actually know, but it's how I read the mail.
I wonder if they'll give incentives to people not to belong - as then
the admin would be zero for them....
.........oh look, a flying pig!
Heather
|
2100.28 | What a load of ...... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Wed Jun 16 1993 13:27 | 10 |
| So, does this now prove that we have been ripped off by Hertz and/or PHH?
Can we really get a better deal getting 3,000 cars from a single vendor,
than we were able to by using the benefits of leasing via the two
largest leasing companies, who were in competition with each other to
provide us the best prices?
Peter
(who's back is not happy driving his new Cavalier...)
|
2100.29 | Lower costs for preferred models | BELFST::TURBVO::McCorry | Kieran G Mc Corry, @BVO (751-3266) | Wed Jun 16 1993 15:11 | 22 |
| Of the 5 mill that Digital will be saving by using a preferred vendor for
cars, how much of that saving will be propogated to us the car scheme
users??
Will we see a reduction in price for these preferred models from say
Vauxhall, or will we still have to pay the current rate for Vauxhall models
while the saving goes into the company coffers (not necessarily a bad
thing).
Is it realistic to say that we still have the choice of taking a
non-preferred model when the costs may be so high as to be completely
prohibitive. And is it realistic to say that we may all see good deals on
say the Vauxhall range (like a Calibra for 500 quid!!).
Given that the freedom of choice in the car scheme was one of the big
winners for the job and provided some relief from the discomfort of salary
freezes etc. it would be a real shame to see this one worthwhile thing
snatched away from us. Talk about a kick in the teeth!!
Any thoughts?
Kieran (who's glad he's still got 2 years left on his Golf GTi lease)
|
2100.30 | Opt-out value decreasing ? | MANTA::SIMON | WHALE: "Life's a beach and then you die..." | Wed Jun 16 1993 16:00 | 9 |
|
I have just rang 'Employee Services' and they quoted me 2950 as the cash value
for a level 5-7. I'm sure that it used to be over 3000. Can someone confirm
this...
I would think 'constructive dismissal' is going to be a phrase that is used a
lot in the next month or so.
Simon
|
2100.31 | Some folks don't realise just how lucky they are! | VARDAF::CHURCH | Dave Church@VBE (DTN 828-6125) | Wed Jun 16 1993 16:09 | 10 |
| RE: .29 and others talking about the changes to the car scheme
>>Given that the freedom of choice in the car scheme was one of the big
>>winners for the job and provided some relief from the discomfort of
>>salary freezes etc. it would be a real shame to see this one
>>worthwhile thing snatched away from us. Talk about a kick in the
>>teeth!!
Just consider yourself lucky that you even have the possibility of
being in a car scheme!
|
2100.32 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Wed Jun 16 1993 16:47 | 7 |
| Maybe the preferred choice will be Metallic Blue Renault 19 16vs.
I'd hate to think we'll be able to get Calibras at half of what
I'm paying...
Ian
|
2100.33 | Re: .31.... I second that | TRUCKS::BEATON_S | I Just Look Innocent | Wed Jun 16 1993 16:55 | 1 |
|
|
2100.34 | No contest | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Wed Jun 16 1993 17:01 | 19 |
|
re -1 --
Don't be too upset. I had a Calibra 16v, & it was the most disappointing
(& potentially most dangerous) car of the >30 that I've owned or driven
extensively in the past 30 years of driving. IMO, a poseur's slug, I'm
afraid..... unreliable, unpredictable rear-end breakaway in press-on
driving (eg on loose gravel, mountain passes, poor surfaces, & even
tight bends), gloomy interior, poor accessories compared to my Mazda 626.
The only area where it excelled was when the crazily-overgeared box
allowed you to cruise through Germany very comfortably at 130 mph.
Suspect the 4x4 turbo is better balanced, & the 6 speed box must help.
2 of my sons have R19 16v's, & they are a vastly better car when driven
hard than the Calibra.
Colin
|
2100.35 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Wed Jun 16 1993 17:03 | 6 |
| >(& potentially most dangerous)
What, even with side impact beams and airbag?
Ian
|
2100.36 | | VANGA::KERRELL | get off of my fence | Wed Jun 16 1993 17:03 | 7 |
| >Just consider yourself lucky that you even have the possibility of
>being in a car scheme!
If I moved jobs to another company, I'd either get a company car or a hike in
salary, so where's the luck in that?
Dave.
|
2100.37 | | VANGA::KERRELL | get off of my fence | Wed Jun 16 1993 17:05 | 9 |
| re,34:
>had a Calibra 16v, & it was the most disappointing (& potentially most
>dangerous) car of the >30 that I've owned or driven extensively in the past
>30 years of driving.
You haven't tried the Mondeo yet then Colin?
Dave ;-)
|
2100.38 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jun 16 1993 17:47 | 11 |
|
>I have just rang 'Employee Services' and they quoted me 2950 as the cash value
>for a level 5-7. I'm sure that it used to be over 3000. Can someone confirm
>this...
Well, I've been out for 9 years, and I get 3,000.......I know a few
level 5-7 got an extra 400, but I don't know what the criteria was
for the additional 400.
Heather
|
2100.39 | Individual Versus Bottom Line | CHEFS::CURRIEI | Dyslexic snice brith | Wed Jun 16 1993 19:40 | 37 |
| I guess the replies I've had to the base Note are more or less what I
was expecting.
What concerns me is that the changes that are taking place seem to
represent a change in management style/culture from one of caring for
the individual to one of management by accountants. The car scheme is
obviously a highly emotive subject with many people who - like me - see
it (saw it?) as one of the great differentiators that make Digital good
to work for.
I understand that Digital needs to look very carefully at every penny
it spends. However, there is going to be a very real impact on morale/
motivation if the changes are radical. I look around and I see people
who are getting ground down by constant increases in workload with no
increase in reward (for which, with inflation, you can read 'with
reducing reward'). Has this factor been considered, or are all
decisions now made purely on the basis of the impact on the bottom
line? It would be nice to think that, sometimes, the company is
prepared to sacrifice some possible savings for the sake of the
individual.
If the changes to the car scheme really do save Digital substantial
sums, then that's great. If all it does is slightly reduce the average
cost of a lease to the individual (who, after all, pays for it out of
his salary) and doesn't save the company much real money, I would argue
that it's not worth it.
I know we're all lucky to have jobs, cars ...etc. It is worth
remembering that Hewlett Packard imposed pay cuts a few years back -
and look where they are now (paying out large sums in their profit
sharing scheme). If Digital's position was life-threatening, then I
guess we would all be prepared to make sacrifices. However, my
understanding is that although times are tough, the worst is past. We
are still a cash-rich company. So how about remembering the poor
troops who are in the front line?
Ian
|
2100.40 | who's paying the saving?? | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Jun 16 1993 19:51 | 12 |
| Why is it I get the impression that the money Digital 'saves' will in
fact come from our pockets.... the costs to Digital will remain the
same, the service will remain the same, the choice will decrease and
the cost to us will increase....
One day we're gonna get a memo saying the 20% savings can be made - we
will all get a 20% pay cut....
Xtine
|
2100.41 | | MANTA::SIMON | WHALE: "Life's a beach and then you die..." | Wed Jun 16 1993 19:56 | 7 |
2100.42 | Check Out ROCKS::UK_DIGITAL | CHEFS::CURRIEI | Dyslexic snice brith | Wed Jun 16 1993 20:32 | 6 |
| If you aren't already aware, Note 769 in the ROCKS::UK_DIGITAL
conference carries a similar debate to this Note. Check it out if you
want more of the same...
Ian
|
2100.43 | HHL Car Park Empty Shock | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Scuba Dive in my Think Tank | Thu Jun 17 1993 11:52 | 11 |
| Re -2
Having just parked at Enterprise House I can assure you that the car
park is virtually empty and that there are probably no ex-lease car
there. People leaving this time round are keeping their car during
"garden leave".
It is difficult to get a space at HHL but you can easily book a space a
few days in advance.
Paul
|
2100.44 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jun 17 1993 14:21 | 10 |
| >. People leaving this time round are keeping their car during
> "garden leave".
I don't see why they shouldn't, they're still employed, being paid a
salary, and are paying for the car - the fact that Digital would
rather have them at home, than on the premisis, is Digitals decision,
however, as they are paying for it, I don't see why they shouldn't
have it.
Heather
|
2100.45 | 'scuse me for breathing! | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Scuba Dive in my Think Tank | Thu Jun 17 1993 14:34 | 6 |
| Re -1
Excuse me but did I imply they shouldn't? All I said that the car park
was empty because people were not leaving their cars on their last day.
Paul
|
2100.46 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jun 17 1993 15:44 | 9 |
| > Excuse me but did I imply they shouldn't? All I said that the car park
> was empty because people were not leaving their cars on their last day.
I would suggest they do, just that their last day is the last day of
their employement with Digital, not their last day working in the
office.
Heather
|
2100.47 | Semantics or what?!?! | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Scuba Dive in my Think Tank | Thu Jun 17 1993 16:30 | 3 |
| I must learn to be more precise...........lat day before garden leave.
paul
|
2100.48 | | YUPPY::RAVEN | | Thu Jun 17 1993 16:47 | 9 |
| I tried to get a space for Friday , and I was told to use the NCP car park
. I needed to drive in to move some some kit from London to Newbury , and
as I was in London Friday and Newbury Monday ... Save the company some
money .... Never mind it now looks like a courier from Enterprise House to
Newbury. Still at least someone will benefit from being able to park Friday
under Enterprise House .
KR
|
2100.49 | | WARNUT::RICE | Steve Rice @OLO | Thu Jun 17 1993 17:27 | 9 |
| <<< Note 2100.47 by YUPPY::PATEMAN "Scuba Dive in my Think Tank
-< Semantics or what?!?! >-
If you're not careful I'll tell Steve Peake and he'll follow you into
this conference. :-) :-)
.Ricey.
[confused readers tune to note 769.* in ROCKS::UK_DIGITAL]
|
2100.56 | ELEVENTH HOUR REPRIVE | BAHTAT::ASH | | Fri Jun 18 1993 18:06 | 6 |
| As it would appear that existing quotes will be honoured before the new
car scheme is in place, does anyone out there have a quote for a
RENAULT 19 16V HATCH
ROB.
|
2100.57 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jun 18 1993 18:39 | 1 |
| It's on the fixed price list..........
|
2100.58 | | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins @OLO | Fri Jun 18 1993 19:03 | 3 |
| >>> It's on the fixed price list..........
It still needs a quote, even if it's on the list.
|
2100.59 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Jun 18 1993 19:14 | 11 |
| I've just spoken to car fleet about this (Hilary Bailey noless!)
The situation is this. If you have a quote already being processed then
you can order from this.
Only orders from personal quotes will be submitted which means you are
out of luck Clive as no one can order from someone elses quote.
All will become clear when the new scheme is announced in a week or so.
Royston
|
2100.60 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jun 18 1993 19:29 | 7 |
| Clive,
But although a quote is needed, the punter still JUST SUBMITS AN ORDER,
and knows the price, hence Mr(s) Punter doesn't have to wait for a quote
to appear before he/she orders the car.
Greg
|
2100.61 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Jun 18 1993 19:32 | 4 |
| Greg has a good point. I forgot to ask if you can still order from the
existing preferred list until July 1st.
Royston
|
2100.50 | | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Sat Jun 19 1993 00:53 | 21 |
|
It strikes me that this is no great change in management strategy (as
mentioned earlier) this company has always been more interested in its
share holders than its employees. IMHO I think they have it wrong if
they motivate the employees right, (the way to a mans heart is through
his wallet) they will be happier, more contented, have more pride in
the company and their work.....thus the company will prosper and the
share holders will be happy. Then we'll all be happy!
but maybe I'm wrong?
Richard
Ps. I'm not hot on the world of finance maybe somebody can enlighten
me, surely once someone has bought shares, they take their chances, as
to wether they go up or down in value and wether they get a dividend
once a year, but the fact the shares go down in value does not affect
us once the shares have been floated on the stock exchange, unless of
course we want to sell some more.
|
2100.51 | Very naive | MARVIN::WALTER | | Mon Jun 21 1993 17:08 | 22 |
| > Ps. I'm not hot on the world of finance maybe somebody can enlighten
> me, surely once someone has bought shares, they take their chances, as
> to wether they go up or down in value and wether they get a dividend
> once a year, but the fact the shares go down in value does not affect
> us once the shares have been floated on the stock exchange, unless of
> course we want to sell some more.
If only it were that easy ...
The problem is that shareholders get to vote at the AGM, which means
that they have power over the board ( who are probably large
shareholders themselves, due to lucrative stock option incentives).
This, of course, means that senior mangement is motivated to run
the company so that it maximises short-term profit. So s*d the
employees. As long as profits are good for a year or two, they get
their bonuses and can move on somewhere else with a "succesful"
track-record. In the meantime shareholders will probably have
cashed-in their holdings. And guess who's left behind ...
|
2100.52 | | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Mon Jun 21 1993 17:33 | 2 |
|
Thanks I didn't realise shareholders actually had some power.
|
2100.53 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Jun 21 1993 18:08 | 16 |
|
Not only that, if a large shareholder threatens to sell if they don't
get their way.....or joins with other shareholders......if they did
sell, the price would fall dramatically, no-one would buy - noone
would loan us money, our customers would decide to hold on to their
money with a hope they wouldn't have to pay at all, our suppliers would
call on their invoices, or want money up front
And we would go out of business very, very quickly
Shareholders have the power, and the companies, wall street, and
major investors know exactly what that power is.
Ask ken.
Heather
|
2100.54 | | UPROAR::64123::EVANSG | Gwyn Evans @ IME - Open DECtrade -> DTN 769-8108 | Mon Jun 21 1993 19:55 | 8 |
| Re: Shareholder's power
Note that in the UK at least, it's very rare for the shares held by
individual (private) shareholders to affect anything, due to the
comparitively large proportion of shares that are held by fund
managers, etc. When _they_ take a view that the company needs to do
something, then they're listened too but if they side with the company
against the small shareholders, then the company doesn't need to worry.
|
2100.55 | | VANGA::KERRELL | get off of my fence | Mon Jun 21 1993 20:13 | 4 |
| Now there's an idea, if we could only find out how many shares are held by
employees...
Dave.
|
2100.62 | Anyone remember company perks ?? | BAHTAT::ASH | | Mon Jun 21 1993 23:02 | 6 |
| No is the answer, the preferred list no longer exists.
I attempted to order via someone elses quote and hit a brick wall
Only the person who requested the quote can order from it, bummer huh!
There would appear to be no loop holes,........... looks like its a
Vauxhall !!
!!
|
2100.63 | You STILL have a choice | BAHTAT::FORCE6::hilton | Party on Dudes | Tue Jun 22 1993 13:48 | 10 |
| >> There would appear to be no loop holes,........... looks like its a
>> Vauxhall !!
No, No, NO, NO!
The mail still says you will be able to get any car of your choice.
Greg
|
2100.64 | Pros and cons | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Tue Jun 22 1993 14:05 | 8 |
| It will be very interesting to see how much "other manufacturer" quotes
will be. My guess is that they will be a few hundred quid more.
Lets hope there is a good side to going single vendor. If we are going
Vauxhall maybe the cost of an Astra GSi or Calibra will be lower than
at present.
Royston
|
2100.65 | But at what premium? | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Tue Jun 22 1993 14:10 | 26 |
| re .7;
yes, you will still be able to pay extra to get your choice, but at the
moment we have two leasing companies in competition with each other, to
provide the best possible prices and service to us.
After July 4th, we appear to have a single supplier, who seems to have
been able to promise savings of 20%. [I wonder if this means the car
supplement value will be reduced by 20%..... but I digress].
Now, let's look at this scenario...
The "main" supplier can do it for 20% less than today.
To exercise your choice, you will have to use (I guess) a leasing company,
that will be providing a much smaller number of vehicles. Will they be
in competition? Will they be offering the best price? Will this cost
the same as today? Or will you have to pay a premium over today's
cost? (bearing in mind that the value of the supplement may be eroded)
So, I guess you will still have a choice. Whether you can afford to exercise
that choice is of course a different matter.
I hope to get some answers at our group meeting tomorrow.
Peter.
|
2100.66 | No-one knows until July 1 | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Jun 22 1993 15:10 | 11 |
| re .9
Your just guessing.
I doubt you will get more info in your team meeting.
Just because we have a preferred manufacturer, doesn't mean we drop PHH
and Hertz. Other computer companies have preferred manufacturers but
still have to employ a lease company, strangely enough, in order to
look after the lease.
|
2100.67 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | D'you think P1... | Tue Jun 22 1993 15:24 | 4 |
| I can't help thinking that this is all another symptom-fix, and not
addressing the real problem.
Laurie.
|
2100.68 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Tue Jun 22 1993 15:42 | 21 |
2100.69 | Get rid of the lot | VANTEN::MITCHELLD | "Management is opaque" | Tue Jun 22 1993 15:58 | 7 |
| yes kill the whole car scheme!! no smiley
give us the money and thats that all over with.
And a mileage a bit more decent than 8p
no more endless discussions over the scheme,
no more fudging the pay and benefits
simplicity is best no company cars
|
2100.70 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | D'you think P1... | Tue Jun 22 1993 17:44 | 12 |
| The problem? Well, I *assume* it's one of expense. I say, "fixing the
symptom" because the rationale behind the single vendor scheme is
clearly one of saving money. Now, the problem could perhaps be better
fixed by say, using more leasing companies in a competitive manner, or
perhaps using those we already have more effectively. However, like
most of the things Digital does, the motive seems to be to make the
lives of the people whose job it is to administer these things,
easier, and sod the end-user.
Laurie.
PS. I'm a contractor, and so, it's not my problem. I'm just observing.
|
2100.71 | Your still creating problems | BAHTAT::FORCE6::hilton | Party on Dudes | Tue Jun 22 1993 18:33 | 23 |
| > The problem? Well, I *assume* it's one of expense. I say, "fixing the
> symptom" because the rationale behind the single vendor scheme is
> clearly one of saving money. Now, the problem could perhaps be better
> fixed by say, using more leasing companies in a competitive manner, or
> perhaps using those we already have more effectively. However, like
> most of the things Digital does, the motive seems to be to make the
> lives of the people whose job it is to administer these things,
> easier, and sod the end-user.
Ye Gods, how many time's will I have to say this!
NOWHERE in the memo does it say we will only use one leasing company.
NOWHERE. There is nothing to stop us negotiating with the single vendor to
get discounts on models after the lease cost. AN Other computer company I
know of has a deal with Vauxhall. They pay 'standard' lease costs, then
VAUXHALL give them money back per car leased.
Now, come the 1st July I may be wrong, but I see little point in fault
finding when no-one actually knows what the new scheme is.
Greg
|
2100.72 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | D'you think P1... | Tue Jun 22 1993 19:30 | 17 |
2100.73 | My guess is as good as yours | BAHTAT::FORCE6::hilton | Party on Dudes | Tue Jun 22 1993 19:43 | 23 |
2100.74 | Is it worth seeking clarification?? | BAHTAT::FORCE6::hilton | Party on Dudes | Tue Jun 22 1993 19:45 | 7 |
| Laurie,
Why don't you put your figures in a mail and send them to Chris Conway for
clarification?
Greg
|
2100.75 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | D'you think P1... | Tue Jun 22 1993 20:29 | 6 |
| RE: .74
Because as a contractor, as far as I'm concerned, the whole thing is
moot.
Laurie.
|
2100.76 | In due course. | BAHTAT::DODD | | Wed Jun 23 1993 11:36 | 18 |
| re .74
I don't think we should get into the habit of sending everything to CC
just because he replies. Once the figures come out in detail I'd like
to understand how we save the company 5mill. My thoughts run like
this:-
5 million saving to Digital. Let's hope we the employees save a bit too
say 1million.
3,500 cars (4,500 employees so hopefully less cars)
1,700 saving per car per year.
I could be convinced that Vauxhall (say) would give us an extra 10% per
car on purchase price so that might be 1,500.
After that I'm beat.
Insurance, service, accidents, theft, tyres... no significant change.
I don't know if I believe the 26million either.
Andrew
|
2100.77 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Wed Jun 23 1993 12:43 | 5 |
| Where did the Vauxhall rumour start?
Why not Rover?
Mark.
|
2100.78 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jun 23 1993 12:51 | 9 |
|
There would be very little admin charge, no quotes, as the cars
would come off the standard list.
I would expect people who take the non-standard cars and quote, to have
to cover the cost of this admin(and people who do the admin) in their
payments.
Heather
|
2100.79 | | VANGA::KERRELL | get off of my fence | Wed Jun 23 1993 13:05 | 3 |
| The Vauxhall rumour? Beats me, I heard GM.
Dave ;-)
|
2100.80 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Jun 23 1993 13:15 | 3 |
| I heard it was between Renault, Nissan and Vauxhall.
Royston
|
2100.81 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jun 23 1993 14:09 | 8 |
|
I would expect vauxhall to be in the running, it has been specifically
targetting companies to get them to deal direct.
It now has 40% of the company car market in the UK.
To get this percentage, it must be doing good deals.
Heather
|
2100.82 | Vauxhall has it !! | SEDOAS::BRISTOW_A | | Wed Jun 23 1993 14:16 | 5 |
| RE. -1
Let's just say, from a very informed source - "It's Vauxhall".!
Andy
|
2100.83 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Jun 23 1993 14:23 | 13 |
| RE .78
> There would be very little admin charge, no quotes, as the cars
> would come off the standard list.
Why will there be no quotes...? we have a standard list now and a quote
is still done for each and every order off it...
If this is where the savings come then why not stop getting quotes for
those off the preferred list....
Xtine
|
2100.84 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jun 23 1993 14:35 | 10 |
|
I mean a quote from the supplier.......we have to get quotes now,
because we get PHH and Hertz to bid against each other, and we get
the cheapest quote (even for the "basket" cars).
If we don't do that from vauxhall(or whoever), but have a standard
price from them, then there's no need for a quote, we've already got the
price.
Heather
|
2100.85 | Tongue in cheek. | BAHTAT::DODD | | Wed Jun 23 1993 15:29 | 6 |
| I received a copy of "Fleet Car" magazine today. In there is a company
claiming to be able to save 30% in some areas and to have saved over
1mill for a 700 car fleet. We are only claiming <20%. Perhaps we could
have done better.
Andrew
|
2100.86 | | TENTO1::BOURNEJ | EASYEDIT rules ok (G6JJK) | Wed Jun 23 1993 17:16 | 13 |
2100.87 | | PEKING::SMITHRW | The Great Pyramid of Bloke | Wed Jun 23 1993 17:25 | 7 |
| re: "Why not Rover?"
I once asked that (long ago, and in another company) and the answer was
that the residuals were better with Ford and Vauxhall.
Richard
|
2100.88 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Squidgy | Wed Jun 23 1993 17:28 | 4 |
| Of course, if they really wanted to save money, they'd switch the
fleet to diesels!
Laurie$Pug_405_GLDT_Estate.
|
2100.89 | Good residuals now | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins @OLO | Wed Jun 23 1993 17:46 | 7 |
| >> I once asked that (long ago, and in another company) and the answer was
>> that the residuals were better with Ford and Vauxhall.
I doubt that's the case now. Rovers come in with very good lease
costs. A major part of the lease cost is a reflection of residual
value. What does happen though is that Rovers tend to be higher spec
than Ford / Vauxhall, thus their price is higher.
|
2100.90 | Why will Diesel save Fleet money ? | CMOTEC::JASPER | | Wed Jun 23 1993 17:58 | 20 |
| ...ITS VAUXHALL (I guess :^))
We keep refering to PHH/Hertz, arent Vauxhall big enough to run their
own leasing dept. specifically for Vauxhall cars for Corporate clients
? This MUST be where the savings are to be made. Vauxhall franchise
holders can fit batteries/exhausts, straighten bent cars, provide
hire/loan cars etc., all that has to be buttoned up
is the Great Tyre Company Rip-off & the whole thing is in-house.
...& if you dont want Vauxhall, then perhaps it means a quote from X or
Y. (At a premium of course).
I'd love to see how the figure for the savings is arrived at, I
speculate that it mainly comes from Users not having to become so
deeply involved in procuring their own cars & hunting missing TAX discs
& arranging with Leasers for MOT's etc., this is an area in which
I've had to waste much time in the past.
Tony
|
2100.91 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Squidgy | Wed Jun 23 1993 18:55 | 15 |
2100.92 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Jun 23 1993 19:12 | 7 |
| The lease costs for Diesels are not any cheaper than petrol cars.
Digital doesn't pay for fuel, we do. The business rate of 8p a mile
could be reduced if we all had diesels I guess but not by much.
It would be a good way of P***ing off the workforce further.
Royston
|
2100.93 | not so | LARVAE::IVES_J | One i-node short of a file system | Thu Jun 24 1993 12:48 | 10 |
| I don't agree. An all diesel fleet would be a good idea in my opinion.
You can get anything from a 'hot hatch' Citroen ZX TD with good enough
acceleration to a BMW/ROVER/MERCEDEZ top end cruiser.
They could simply offer a mix of diesels and petrol cars, drop the
company mileage from 8p to 5p and let the punters decide. I would also
imagine that we could get insurrance savings on an all diesel fleet.
I did 19,500 business miles last year. Go figure
|
2100.94 | Citroen ZX td NOT!! | CEEHER::MCCABE | | Thu Jun 24 1993 13:13 | 11 |
|
I've been introduced to one of these recently, and was not impressed. It did
not bear close comparison even to my 8 valve golf. It was OK while the
turbo was spinning, but had poor top end power, and very weak acceleration
before the turbo cut in.
OK for motorway cruising, but not an engine for real fun driving.
All IMHO of course
Terry
|
2100.95 | Citroen ZX TD YES!! | ROCKS::CAMP | | Thu Jun 24 1993 13:49 | 13 |
| Its horses for courses.... I have a ZX TD and find it performs well,
but conceed that its only as good as a 1600cc petrol car, all else
being equal and I could hardly describe it as hot hatch performance.
However the driving technique is different and that could help form a
poor impression.
I would suggest you try one for a week to get a really valid test
and if you have a company car this can be arranged by calling
Paul Dulson on 0753-822100 at Citroen UK, who were able to arrange a
loan ZTTD for TWO weeks for me! (though I only took one weeks worth.)
A diesel convert,
Mike
|
2100.96 | | WOTVAX::FIDDLERM | This is the Winter of your Mind | Thu Jun 24 1993 14:03 | 6 |
| re-1
>However the driving technique is different
How is the technique different for Diesels?
Mikef
|
2100.97 | | PEKING::SMITHRW | Off-duty Rab C Nesbit stunt double | Thu Jun 24 1993 14:22 | 12 |
| You drive to a different fuel pump.
8*) 8*)
Seriously, one thing you find with a diesel is that you get full power
from stone cold. TD's give you a terrific torque spread - makes for a
wonderfully flexible and relaxing-to-drive engine. The turbocharger
was invented specifically for the diesel engine and transforms it. IMO
all diesels should be turboed.
Richard
|
2100.98 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Thu Jun 24 1993 14:32 | 14 |
2100.99 | Do it like this. | ROCKS::CAMP | | Fri Jun 25 1993 13:43 | 19 |
| Re-2
Petrol engines tend to operate over a wide speed range, eg 1500rpm to
say 6000 rpm, and with reasonable torque from 2000 to 5500, and max BHP
at the high 4500-5000 or higher. So with this wide range if you want to
drive the car sportingly you will tend to use the high engine speeds
say 3000 to 6000. With a diesel the speed range is less 1000-4750 but
gives very good torque from about 1500 or less to 3500, with max torque at
3000ish. But the torque drops off fairly quickly above 3500, so if you
want to drive it "sportingly" you will tend to keep it in the max
torque range around 2000-3500. If you use the petrol technique and use
the top end say 3000 to max engine speed the performance will be poor,
but the polution would be quite spectacular.
So with petrol use the top end of the engine speed, with the oil burner
keep it in the mid range.
|
2100.100 | This applies here as well | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Fri Jun 25 1993 18:59 | 30 |
| This subject raises it's ugly head with monotonous regularity. Someone
expounds the advantages of Diesels, a petrol patriot then goes on at
length about how he can get equal performance economy etc from his
high performance jobby!.
Fact:
Every manufacturer and official body recognises that diesels ARE more
fuel efficient, I doubt that even you could match the 112MPG measured
(and verified independantly by the RAC) by the AX 1.4 diesel in a long
distance run. (not a test track theoretical)
Further, if the 1.8 SRi cavalier could produce such astounding milage
over general use, don't you think Vauxhall would be shouting it from
the rooftop?. Crowing about how much better it was than their own
diesel engined equivalents?.
It's no good comparing what you do with anyone else, you've got to
measure like for like. So whatever milage your getting (calculated
whichever way you do) you will undoubtedly get better driving a diesel
IN THE SAME MANNER.
Let's get back to reality: there are some of us who think Td's are the
best thing since sliced bread, there are other's who'd never entertain
the idea of driving an oil burner and will quote all amnner of
'statistics' to prove themselves right.
In the end you can only take your own opinions as the judge.
Richard
|
2100.101 | Take it easy Richard. | ROCKS::CAMP | | Fri Jun 25 1993 20:35 | 12 |
| Richard,
No need to get so upset about it. I agree with your .-1 comments,
and after having a 2 litre petrol BMW averaging 25-26 MPG, and the
1.9 litre ZX TD averaging 42-43 MPG driven in the same manner I don't
need any convincing.
Bit upset that diesel is the same price as unleaded though.....
Mike
|
2100.102 | Vauxhall or SAAB | CHEFS::CURRIEI | Dyslexic snice brith | Tue Jun 29 1993 18:29 | 7 |
| For those of you who haven't received your hardcopy of the latest car
scheme brochure (mine's just arrived) - it is General Motors (meaning
Vauxhall or SAAB) for the preferred range. I'm still digesting the rest
- but looks like no surprises.
Ian
|
2100.103 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jun 29 1993 18:34 | 10 |
| > - but looks like no surprises.
Yup, it says the figures are on VTX, car fleet admin.....but they're not.
It does say that you can buy a private car, Vauxhall, and will get
free deliver, plates, road fun for a year , value 500 quid,
beginning sept 93
|
2100.104 | Does that include the Cherokee ? | SEDOAS::BRISTOW_A | | Tue Jun 29 1993 18:47 | 7 |
| Isn't the Cherokee Jeep a General Motors vehicle ???
If so, could be a steal.!
Does anybody know ?
Andy
|
2100.105 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jun 29 1993 18:59 | 4 |
|
don't know.....you might have to settle for the Frontera
Heather
|
2100.106 | explanation please | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Tue Jun 29 1993 19:47 | 6 |
|
Re .103
What exactly does that mean???
Regards martin
|
2100.107 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Jun 29 1993 19:51 | 8 |
2100.108 | | OASS::BURDEN_D | This is a Studebaker Year | Tue Jun 29 1993 19:54 | 3 |
| Jeep is owned by Chrysler. Do you have an Cadillac dealers over there?? :-)
Dave
|
2100.109 | Through Rover! | SEDOAS::BRISTOW_A | | Tue Jun 29 1993 20:02 | 7 |
| re. -1
O.K, so the Jeep is Chrysler owned.
We can now get them care of Rover dealers and some others in the UK.!
Andy
|
2100.110 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jun 29 1993 20:03 | 18 |
2100.111 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jun 29 1993 20:05 | 9 |
|
> What exactly does that mean???
1. the info that the sheet says is on VTX - isn't.
2. if you want to buy a new Vauxhall privately, they'll give you a deal
where you don't have to pay 500 quid of the costs.
Heather
|
2100.112 | Wots-the-cost? | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Tue Jun 29 1993 20:30 | 1 |
| Are there any PRICES in the brochure??????
|
2100.113 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jun 29 1993 20:31 | 5 |
| > Are there any PRICES in the brochure??????
No, the glossy car mags never have prices.
Heather
|
2100.114 | Mostly NO's | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Tue Jun 29 1993 20:39 | 12 |
| No the quotes or standard car bag will go on VTX on July 1st.
NO ORDERS WILL BE TAKEN UNTIL AUGUST 1ST!
It also doesn't say what the new allowances will be though it does state that
if your taking part of your allowance as salary this amount won't change until
the current lease expires.
It also doesn't say how you arrange test drives as it now states you CANNOT
recommend a garage.
Richard
|
2100.115 | Lease prices? | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Tue Jun 29 1993 20:40 | 2 |
| Heather, sorry i meant INTERNAL prices, like what will qualified
car users have to pay for cars like cavs, carls, fronts etc per year?
|
2100.116 | | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Tue Jun 29 1993 20:43 | 1 |
| Re: .114 oops, notes clash
|
2100.117 | | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Tue Jun 29 1993 21:14 | 9 |
| re: <<< Note 2100.110 by SUBURB::THOMASH "The Devon Dumpling" >>>
> Interestingly enough, the colour nearest to our logo isn't
> Burgundy red, but Satin red
I would have said Flame red was nearer the mark!!!
Sharon
|
2100.118 | Where are those colourted specs? | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jun 30 1993 12:59 | 11 |
|
> I would have said Flame red was nearer the mark!!!
Well, I looked at that and didn't thinks so, however here I am
under flourescent light.
When I took the stuff hpome to look at, and saw it in daylight, then
I agree.
Heather
|
2100.119 | July has been cancelled?? | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Jun 30 1993 13:01 | 5 |
| No orders till August 1st!.... are car fleet on holiday in July then?
Xtine... who was expecting to be able to order next week and take
delivery in August...
|
2100.120 | Descrepency | WEAR::BODDY | Slaven was born offside !!! | Wed Jun 30 1993 13:58 | 10 |
|
According to the cover letter "in your pack" it says "new 'car
supplements' have now been established " , however it goes on to say
"from 1 August 1993 the current car cost , and market supplements will
be adjusted to reflect the new car supplement levels " .
If they have already been established why do we have to wait until the
1 August ?
Bill
|
2100.121 | So, what does it mean? | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Wed Jun 30 1993 14:23 | 8 |
2100.122 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jun 30 1993 14:31 | 19 |
2100.123 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Wed Jun 30 1993 14:44 | 10 |
| I doubt whether asking your boss will do any good. My boss got the same
information pack as everyone else and if therefore none the wiser about
the new scheme. Not her fault you understand.
My advice (FWIW) would be to wait until 1st August when things will hopefully
become clearer. Alternatively, collate questions from your unit and put them
to CC to avoid duplication.
Ian
|
2100.124 | The written truth | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Jun 30 1993 15:55 | 18 |
| re .121
From 'THE LETTER'
employees who do not use all of their supplement to lease a car, will
also see no immediate change. The amount will continue for the
remainder of the existing lease period. Future lease arrangements will
be based on the new Car Supplement Levels.
For those who have previously elected to take their whole supplement as
salary, there will be no change.
Finally, those below level 8, who previously had to order at least the
minimum car, also now have the option to take some of their supplement
as salary. (I guess that means if you get a 900cc Corsa, then the you
pocket the difference between the base level as salary.
Greg
|
2100.125 | surely not?? | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Jun 30 1993 18:17 | 22 |
2100.126 | A change in mindset? | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Thu Jul 01 1993 13:51 | 68 |
| My reading of the new manual leads me to believe the current system of 'base'
car plus supplement will be replaced by a level based 'supplement' which is
the whole car cost.
You'll no longer get a quote on 'the amount above base' but the price quoted
will be the total lease cost, and yuor level allowance will be a total
allowance.
In each level band there will be some/several models from the GM range which
will fit comfortably, and some that will allow some cash to spare, whilst the
exotic 4x4 16v turbo limited slip close ratio twin cam variable manifold
multipoint whatsists will cost you out of your basic salary.
Doesn't sound much different, but it is in fact a radical change in mindset.
numbers wise....
OLD NEW
^^^^ level in the god's
Saab CD ?
|-----------------
Salary |level 10/11 band
| Carlton GLS
------ |
| level supplement | Cavalier Diplomat
| 8/9 1300 | Carlton l
| 10/11 2200 (?) |-------------- Cavalier SRi
| |level 8/9 band
| | Cavalier CD
------------- | Astra GSi
| | Cavalier GLS
| |-------------- Astra CD
| | Astra GLS
| | Nova GSi
| | Astra LS
| | Nova ????
| |
| base cost of |
|'free car' |
| (last known figure |
| 3400 for car |
| 3000 for cash) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
--------------------------------------------------------
CAVEAT: This is MY INTERPRETATION, not known for fact, and the
car's that match are an INTELIGENT (or otherwise!) GUESS.
I believe from the information given in the managers brief that the cash
equivalents will be lower than the amalgamation of the current base and
allowance simply to reflect the better deal that GM have offered.
However, untill the figures are released we won't know.
FLAME ON.
It's 1st JULY, where are the figures? the glossy brochure was notably free
from fact. My lease expires in September, I need to place an order in early
August, and I need the numbers NOW to work out the financial impact to me.
So come on fleet, get VTX on line now!
Flame off
Richard
|
2100.127 | When is the beginning of July ? | SUPER7::HUGHESA | Swimming against the tide @#%* | Thu Jul 01 1993 13:53 | 15 |
|
Checked VTX this morning for the FY94 list ....
Further to Chris Conway's mail of 15th June 1993, the Preferred Car
List has now been deleted and no further orders will be accepted against
it.
Details of the Digital FY94 Car Scheme will be circulated to
employees and appear on VTX at the beginning of July.
The question is, when is the beginning of July ?
Andy.
|
2100.128 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Thu Jul 01 1993 14:05 | 11 |
| The section on Car Hire in the new Car Scheme brochure (easily mistaken
for a glossy that you pick up from a Vauxhall dealer) gives the numbers
for Hertz and PHH inferring that the car will be supplied by one of
these companies.
This makes sense if you get a non GM car as Hertz or PHH would supply
the car. This begs the question will Hertz or PHH be supplying the
cars from the preferred list as well ? If so how does the special
arrangements with Vauxhall work ?
Royston
|
2100.129 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 01 1993 14:07 | 13 |
|
>You'll no longer get a quote on 'the amount above base' but the price quoted
>will be the total lease cost, and yuor level allowance will be a total
>allowance.
>Doesn't sound much different, but it is in fact a radical change in mindset.
VTX used to have in it the total lease cost, the "amount above base" was a
newish introduction.......so, back to the old mindset.
Heather
|
2100.130 | Never mind VTX... | SUBURB::MCDONALDA | Shockwave Rider | Thu Jul 01 1993 14:21 | 5 |
| I wouldn't mind just having the brochure and letter. I've seen the
envelopes in which the stuff arrived, but have yet to get one.
Perhaps they're trying to tell me summat,
Angus
|
2100.131 | | NEWOA::FIDO_T | Conation is the key | Thu Jul 01 1993 14:35 | 5 |
| > The question is, when is the beginning of July ?
Sunday 4th July - Fiscal calendar
Terry
|
2100.132 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Thu Jul 01 1993 14:41 | 13 |
2100.133 | You will have a Vauxhall!!!! | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Thu Jul 01 1993 14:46 | 13 |
|
One thing it said at the back of the brochure under the UK car Scheme
Policy section 3. Eligiblity is
"Employee's who receive a car supplement will be EXPECTED to obtain
a car through the Car Scheme. However, in certain circumstances where
the provision of a car is, in the Company's opinion inappropriate, this
requirement may be waived."
Now theres some food for thought!!!!!
Regards Martin
|
2100.134 | | WIZZER::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Thu Jul 01 1993 14:47 | 12 |
| RE: .126
From the appliance of logic...
If we do get quoted for the whole lease cost, say 3400 for a Vauxhall
Cavalier LS. The last page of the car scheme brochure states, 2.c "To
ensure that the lease cost payments do not exceed 20% of an employee's
base salary." So a just-over midpoint level 4 on 14000 can only
contribute 2800 to a car, which doesn't even get a Cavalier. On the
old quote scheme they would have to get a car for -600 !
tp
|
2100.135 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Thu Jul 01 1993 15:02 | 16 |
2100.136 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 01 1993 15:09 | 11 |
|
> "Employee's who receive a car supplement will be EXPECTED to obtain
> a car through the Car Scheme. However, in certain circumstances where
> the provision of a car is, in the Company's opinion inappropriate, this
> requirement may be waived."
This was introduced with the VAT change, a few years ago, it is not new.
Heather
|
2100.137 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 01 1993 15:11 | 12 |
|
> If we do get quoted for the whole lease cost, say 3400 for a Vauxhall
> Cavalier LS. The last page of the car scheme brochure states, 2.c "To
> ensure that the lease cost payments do not exceed 20% of an employee's
> base salary." So a just-over midpoint level 4 on 14000 can only
> contribute 2800 to a car, which doesn't even get a Cavalier. On the
> old quote scheme they would have to get a car for -600 !
This has been in effect for at least 8 years that I know of, the
manager has to approve the "over 20%"
Heather
|
2100.138 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 01 1993 15:15 | 6 |
|
I'm beginning to wonder how well the car scheme was actually understood.
Heather - who investigated it, continues to monitor changes, and
keeps out!
|
2100.139 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Thu Jul 01 1993 15:19 | 6 |
2100.140 | | WIZZER::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Thu Jul 01 1993 15:59 | 12 |
| Yes but the point I was making was that the assumptions in the previous
note are not held out by the statement about the 20% because it doesn't
make sense that lower paid employees can't even afford the standard car
without manager approval.
On a lighter note I think the glossy is impressive but not totally
professional; 2 PCL, "All cars on the PCL will run on unleaded or diesel
fuel". So... I can choose the cheapest pump at the station to fill up
from ? I can use diesel to get more mpg or petrol if I want to go
fast. That's quite a good option ;-)
tp
|
2100.141 | Not THAT new | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Thu Jul 01 1993 15:59 | 8 |
| re .129, Heather...
>> VTX used to have in it the total lease cost, the "amount above base" was a
>> newish introduction.......so, back to the old mindset.
Maybe new on VTX, but even back in 1985 when I had my first car there was the
allowance above base, and lease cost above base. So it's not new
Richard
|
2100.142 | When'll we get hard figures? | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Thu Jul 01 1993 16:13 | 19 |
| Another point to note is that your all talking about the price of cars AS ON
THE EXTINCT SCHEME. The costs are expected to be considerably cheaper,
therefore what you regard as a base car will also be cheaper.
Also, following on from my assertions as to the price within band, there WON'T
be a 'base' car, but cars in each job scale band that are cheaper, the norm,
and more expensive.
This is what I keep referring to as a change of mindset, forget current
prices, forget base cars, think your allowance VS the full scale of GM car
prices.
Oh, and I think that all other's even those that WERE 'base' will now be a lot
more expensive.
PPS, the brochure does mention the insurance contribution, so it's still
there, wrapped up in the price.
richard
|
2100.143 | get a life! | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Thu Jul 01 1993 16:14 | 6 |
| Trev,
Read the sentence again - it says "or" not "and". And the 20%
does refer to the driver price, not the total cost.
Ian
|
2100.144 | | WIZZER::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Thu Jul 01 1993 16:19 | 4 |
| Of course it says 'or', if it said 'and' that'd mean we'd have to queue
for the unleaded pump and half fill up then queue at the diesel pump to
fill up. And... we don't know whether the 'lease cost payment'
includes the supplement or not, do we ?
|
2100.145 | | PEKING::NASHD | | Thu Jul 01 1993 16:22 | 6 |
| ho hum, my lease expires ummmm....July 1st.
Guess I've got my car for a bit longer than expected, like another 3
months I guess.
|
2100.146 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 01 1993 16:26 | 13 |
|
> Yes but the point I was making was that the assumptions in the previous
> note are not held out by the statement about the 20% because it doesn't
> make sense that lower paid employees can't even afford the standard car
> without manager approval.
This has always been the case.
Personally I think it does make sense, however that's not the point,
it's something that has always been in the scheme, why bring it
up now?
Heather
|
2100.147 | 20%=driver price | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Thu Jul 01 1993 16:59 | 6 |
| I was always under the impression that the 20% was the extra
contribution you could add on top of your car allowance i.e
the driver price.
Martin
|
2100.150 | | WIZZER::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Thu Jul 01 1993 17:29 | 9 |
| >I was always under the impression that the 20% was the extra
> contribution you could add on top of your car allowance i.e
> the driver price.
Yes it was. Otherwise I would never have been able to have the cars I
did. The point I was making... was that if that previous note was true
(er .126 or thereabouts) and the bit about 20% was true, then people on
lower salaries wouldn't be able to have the old 'base' car without
their manager's consent..oh what's the use, nobody understands me :-)
|
2100.151 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 01 1993 17:35 | 12 |
| These are the actual words taken from the 1988 car scheme stuff......
2. You may not contribute more than 20% of your basic salary towards
the provision of a car. If you currently contribute more than
20%, you will be required to revert to this figure when the
vehicle is due for replacement.
Heather
|
2100.152 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 01 1993 17:36 | 5 |
|
Opps, 148 and 149 were mine, I just put them together...then 150
slipped in before I put in my change
Heather
|
2100.154 | it doesn't add up | KERNEL::BARTHUR | | Thu Jul 01 1993 21:36 | 17 |
|
Can anyone shed any light on where the 26 mill., figure comes from?
4000 cars at a lease cost of 3400 p.a. = 13.6mill
4000 cars have 2 bumps a year @500 = 2.0mill
Insurance = 1.0mill
6 administrators @50,000 p.a. = 0.3mill
---------
16.9mill
these figures are all guesses of course, but they cant be far
wrong. can they?
Just a thought, glad i've never been in the scheme!
Bill
|
2100.155 | Hummm | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Fri Jul 02 1993 12:00 | 19 |
2100.156 | A bit excessive. | ROCKS::CAMP | | Fri Jul 02 1993 12:31 | 8 |
| Maybe its a case of creative accounting to help offset TAX, rather than
the real cost, but there is a big difference between the estimated
figure of 16.9M and the 26M management claim. So where does this 9M go?
Does it really cost 26,000,000/4,000 = 6500pounds per year per car for
a nominal 12,000 pound car? It does appear excessive.
Mike
|
2100.157 | Sun readers demand to know. | BAHTAT::DODD | | Fri Jul 02 1993 12:59 | 11 |
| Firstly the 26mill has been around as the cost for a few years - I
suspect it is legend rather than fact. I also suspect it dates from the
time of 4,500 cars. If we are now at 4,500 employees I find it hard to
believe that we have more than 3,500 cars - I realise this just makes
the numbers worse.
I'd like to see the current cost set out and how the saving of 5 mill
per annum is to be achieved. I doubt I'll see it because that would
mean the "faceless ones" could actually be measured. CC may shake them.
Andrew
|
2100.153 | The latest from VTX ... | SUPER7::HUGHESA | Swimming against the tide @#%* | Fri Jul 02 1993 13:13 | 13 |
|
NEWSFLASH
********************************IMPORTANT************************************
DETAILS OF THE DIGITAL FY94 CAR SCHEME ARE NOW BEING CIRCULATED TO ALL
EMPLOYEES. THE PREFERRED CAR LIST AND PRICES WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE UNTIL
MID-JULY.
NO NEW QUOTES OR ORDERS WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL 1ST AUGUST ONWARDS. THOSE
QUOTES AND ORDERS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED WILL BE HONOURED AND
WILL BE BASED ON THE DIGITAL FY93 CAR SCHEME DRIVER PRICES AND SUPPLEMENTS.
********************************IMPORTANT************************************
|
2100.158 | Mushroom's | SUPER7::HUGHESA | Swimming against the tide @#%* | Fri Jul 02 1993 13:19 | 12 |
|
The question is why does the memo in the "Digital Car Scheme" envolope
dated 28th June, imply the Prefered Car List would be available on 1st
July when the scheme becomes effective, VTX yesterday stated the list
would be available at the beginning of July and today state mid-July.
How can so much change over five days ?
Andy.
PS: This is a perfect example IMHO of what is wrong with the company as a whole.
If we treat real customers like this no wonder they are going elsewhere.
|
2100.159 | Shaking from the top | LARVAE::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, TSE - Technology Services, End-User Computing | Fri Jul 02 1993 13:21 | 81 |
2100.160 | Further from VTX | LARVAE::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, TSE - Technology Services, End-User Computing | Fri Jul 02 1993 13:29 | 10 |
| VTX menu system also shows:
1. Ex-Lease cars for sale
2. Recent Leasing Quotes
I thought that the letter said only the driver can buy the car.... so
what is the point of 1.??
I am pleased about 2., though.... that is something sorely missed
during the last 12 months.
|
2100.161 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Jul 02 1993 13:30 | 42 |
| > Can anyone shed any light on where the 26 mill., figure comes from?
> 4000 cars at a lease cost of 3400 p.a. = 13.6mill
> 4000 cars have 2 bumps a year @500 = 2.0mill
> Insurance = 1.0mill
> 6 administrators @50,000 p.a. = 0.3mill
>
> ---------
> 16.9mill
Well, I know of cars that have had 13,000 quids worth of repairs
done...........I also know of Cosworths that have had to have
practically everything but the body relaced, after being knicked and
stripped.
Also, I had one bump in my car - I was rear-ended when I stopped, and
she didn't - my car, so I know the costs to repair my car..........
1,300 quid....they also have paid for my physio, prescriptions,
excess, and we are now debating whiplash compensation.
The lady who rear-ended me - well, it would have needed new radiator,
bonet, side panels........her car was a company car.
I would think that this "bump" would cost their insurers in excess of
5,000 at the end of the day.
I would think that the repairs here is WAAAAAAAAy under.
Neither have you included the extra supplements for levels.
Or the electronic systems they use (support and maintenence) between
DEC and PHH/Hertz, and the internal ones.
or the phone bills
or someone apart from the administrators to manage/negotiate
or the lease cars we have to pick up the tab for for leavers, or
maternity breaks who don't take cars............or the 20-30% discounts
we fund for takeovers
Or the extra we pay when we overrun the miles/lease
Or keeping VTX up-to-date :-)
Heather
|
2100.162 | na na | KERNEL::BARTHUR | | Fri Jul 02 1993 14:39 | 15 |
|
eh,
That's why everybody pays insurance, Digital only picks up the
first 500 quid. So it doesn't matter what other costs are involved and
that's the point.
Everything is based around 3400, even a level 12 with a Carlos
Fandango "opposite sex genital attractor" . Level 8 and above are on a
different scale and I think it's 5000, so assuming that we have 2000
drivers on that scale, that would cost 3,000,000.
So are you saying it costs 8 mill, to keep records and make phone
calls?
Bill
|
2100.163 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Jul 02 1993 14:50 | 19 |
| > eh,
> That's why everybody pays insurance, Digital only picks up the
> first 500 quid. So it doesn't matter what other costs are involved and
> that's the point.
Wrong, Digital pays it all - some may come out of a central point,
some may come out of an individual cost centre, but at the end of the
day, Digital self insures.
> Everything is based around 3400, even a level 12 with a Carlos
> Fandango "opposite sex genital attracto Level 8 and above are on a
> different scale and I think it's 5000, so assuming that we have 2000
> drivers on that scale, that would cost 3,000,000.
wrong again, level 7 and below is an amount I can't remember, if you
need the car for the job, level 8 is 3,400, 9-10 is 4,600 level 12 is
5,200 above level 12 is some higher amount again that I've forgotten.
Heather
|
2100.164 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | The match has gone out | Fri Jul 02 1993 15:34 | 9 |
2100.165 | tant pis | KERNEL::BARTHUR | | Fri Jul 02 1993 15:47 | 10 |
|
Heather i can't be bothered arguing! But what you say about the
costs per level is not correct.
Digital self insures? Nonsense. If you mean Third Party only, then
we must be mad to let the boy racers loose with the four wheel
skateboards.
At the end of the day, if those in the know don't publish the
figures we could speculate all day. I simply don't believe it.
|
2100.166 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Fri Jul 02 1993 15:50 | 5 |
| re.164:
Laurie, maybe CC has a different ideas about who the right people are!
Dave (blimey, I'm still here)
|
2100.167 | | WIZZER::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Fri Jul 02 1993 15:58 | 8 |
| Bill, just ask our manager how much she's had to pay out for my stolen
car, a stolen Golf Gti, a bent MR2... It makes sense for us to have
3rd party if it works out being cheaper just to pay for mending cars
bent by ourselves. It also puts more pressure on the manager's to not
let the proven bad drivers have high risk cars (or even a Digital car
at all), and it does happen.
tp
|
2100.168 | published..... | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Jul 02 1993 15:59 | 45 |
2100.169 | Spot the fruedian slip :-) | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Jul 02 1993 16:10 | 11 |
2100.170 | it took a lot of provoking | KERNEL::BARTHUR | | Fri Jul 02 1993 16:48 | 6 |
|
well that's the answer then isn't it. It's costing Digital nine
million a year in theft and prangs.
Maybe we're getting nearer the truth now. So who wants to volunteer the
true figure?
|
2100.171 | Why is there a PCL? | BAHTAT::DODD | | Fri Jul 02 1993 16:56 | 11 |
| Something that puzzles me in the new scheme...
Why is there a PCL at all? Secondly which GM cars are on it? Suppose
the only cars on the PCL are Cavaliers and Astras, everything else is
special?
One of the big hassles with the old PCL was that as interest rates, car
prices, car tax all fell over the year the PCL prices were overpriced.
Won't the same thing happen? I know all will be revealed in "mid-July"
but I was just wondering.
Andrew
|
2100.172 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jul 02 1993 17:13 | 14 |
| re .171
From the manual on supplements:
(every year) Prices to the standard car are then obtained from the
supplier. An inflation factor is then applied..to cover estimated
increases in leasing costs over the following 12 month period...
(and now the interesting bit)
....Finally an allowance is then added to reflect competitive practise
of providing fuel for personal, social and domestic use. This final
figure then establishes the supplement for each band
|
2100.173 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Fri Jul 02 1993 17:41 | 9 |
2100.174 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Fri Jul 02 1993 18:24 | 7 |
| re.168:
I never did understand why the Cavalier SRi was a level 8/9 car and the CDi was
a level 10/11 car when the SRi was always more expensive on the scheme than the
CDi.
Dave.
|
2100.175 | | WOTVAX::FIDDLERM | This is the Winter of your Mind | Fri Jul 02 1993 18:43 | 7 |
| Does anyone know what rules will apply under the new scheme as to who
actually gets a car/allowance? There used to be some milage criteria
for L7 and below, but I can't remember what it was.
Ta
Mikef
|
2100.176 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Fri Jul 02 1993 19:11 | 30 |
2100.177 | Car scheme = salary reduction scheme. | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Fri Jul 02 1993 19:13 | 20 |
2100.178 | IMHO | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jul 02 1993 19:22 | 24 |
2100.179 | Direct from the man who should know! | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Fri Jul 02 1993 19:26 | 28 |
2100.180 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Fri Jul 02 1993 19:27 | 4 |
| for the term of their exisiting lease only. The new lease will be under the
new terms.
From the document that should be right written by the man that should know.
|
2100.181 | | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Fri Jul 02 1993 19:37 | 5 |
| Nope,
Chris specifically said that unless you opt out, it will remain the same!!!!!
mb
|
2100.182 | In my letter | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jul 02 1993 19:40 | 11 |
| Martin,
I'm afraid you and Chris must have it wrong.
The letter says:
"Future lease arrangements will be based on the new Car Supplements"
I'll be happy to discuss this over a pint next week ;^)
Greg
|
2100.183 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Jul 02 1993 19:47 | 6 |
|
>Chris also said that after extensive calculations, it is STILL most cost
>effective to remain IN the car scheme, rather than opt out!
i WONDER IF i SHOULD SEND HIM MY CALACULATI0NS.....Heather
|
2100.184 | Well it is either one or the other! | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Fri Jul 02 1993 19:48 | 15 |
| Greg,
what, only one pint?
Yup, it appears that there is a mis-match between "the letter" and "the Boss"!
As was mentioned in UK Digital only moments ago ...
"This looks like a pay cut to me"!
You would think that as a morale booster, Digital UK could pass on a little
of the savings to the employee, as in non-monetary terms we are getting
squeezed.
mb
|
2100.185 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Jul 02 1993 19:52 | 6 |
|
I would think, with thendeal, then the cars should be that much less,
so you wouldn't be worse off.......unless the deal isn't really a deal
after all.
Heather
|
2100.187 | we're all mushrooms | KERNEL::BARTHUR | | Fri Jul 02 1993 20:10 | 5 |
|
re.173 so that means the car scheme actually costs 35 mill??
That's even less believable.
So come on finance print the figures!
|
2100.188 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Fri Jul 02 1993 20:12 | 10 |
2100.189 | Surely not | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Fri Jul 02 1993 20:54 | 13 |
2100.190 | On whose figures? | MILE::JENKINS | Suitably refreshed | Fri Jul 02 1993 20:56 | 5 |
|
I don't believe that when the new company car tax scheme comes into
operation, anyone doing less than 2.5k will be better off.
Richard
|
2100.191 | Some sums | ZEM::ILETT | | Fri Jul 02 1993 21:09 | 43 |
2100.192 | VTX - Digital UK Fleet Administration (car fleet) | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Sat Jul 03 1993 19:12 | 17 |
2100.193 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Jul 05 1993 12:59 | 21 |
2100.194 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Mon Jul 05 1993 14:42 | 17 |
2100.195 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Jul 05 1993 15:06 | 15 |
|
>Do the sums, work out what it *really* costs *you*, get an exchange and mart, buy a bike
>and cycle to work :-)
I've done the sums....for a 2.0L new car every 3 years, they're posted
here somewhere, that's why I take the money.
Also, having just had to claim via my legal protection, I am very very
pleased I am not coverd by Digital, as I would not have been able to
claim for a lot of the things I had to fork out for.
Like appliances, prescription charges, and whiplash injury
Heather
|
2100.196 | Confirmed - salary reduction (for me, at least) | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Mon Jul 05 1993 15:08 | 27 |
2100.197 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Jul 05 1993 15:37 | 8 |
| Peter, this is very interesting. Obviously bad news for level 8's that
have a standard car as they will be losing out. This would indicate
that higher value Vauxhalls (ie Calibras, Astra GSi's) will have a
cheaper driver price than before.
Royston
|
2100.198 | Oh yes you would... | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Mon Jul 05 1993 15:42 | 9 |
2100.199 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Jul 05 1993 15:59 | 5 |
|
Really ? Maybe this is a well kept secret? well, from my manager anyway.
Heather
|
2100.200 | Wot ? ^^^00^^^ no secrets ? | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Mon Jul 05 1993 16:24 | 5 |
| - .199 - Your Manager (assuming she/he is in the scheme) receives an
insurance package every start of fiscal which reminds drivers of this
and the other services available from insurance.
Doug
|
2100.201 | 700 quid X "x" =5,000,000 | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Mon Jul 05 1993 17:56 | 31 |
|
I cannot see where 5,000,000 savings are coming from, I would also like
to see where the current 26,000,000 goes, why have we seen no official
figures released, this all sounds to me like savings on paper rather
than real savings.
It's a bit like the 40 & 50% savings on tyres quoted, but in fact in
many cases it is actully cheaper to shop around find special offers
etc. and buy cash....an example on a ford Escort at a previous co. we
had instructions to use Joe bloggs tyres, so I did four new tyres
fitted and I asked how much is that going to cost them, I was told #160
they work out #40 each at the discount we offer you, but if you want
any for yourself they are on special at #25 each but don't tell your
boss.........now I make that a cost of #15 a tyre yet the accountants
insist it was a 40% saving!......some people just can't see further
than the end of their noses can they!
Now back to the new car scheme, if we used to give a 1300 pounds
supplement for an SRI (which was available for 800, so the holder had
his SRI plus 500 quid) and we now negotiate getting one for 600 quid
and drop the suplement to 600 quid that is a saving to the co. of 700
per level 8, now 500 quid is effectively a paycut to the supplement
holder and the real saving is 200 quid. Now try explaining that to an
accountant to an accountant the saving is 700 quid per level 8 car, and
the driver still has the same car so what's he got to complain about?
In summary the major saving will be in pay cuts.
But then again all salary structures are to be re-evaluted, so you
might get the 500quid back ......and pigs might fly!
Richard
|
2100.202 | rant rave save | TRUCKS::BUSHEN_P | Reproduced without protection | Mon Jul 05 1993 18:28 | 20 |
| > I know we all need hardcopy policy documents and the policy and
> guidelines is very high quality indeed. However, I would have preferred
> a photocopy to show that the company is really trying to save bucks.
>
bulk order printing works out cheaper than photcopying (half priceI remember)
$ stick tongue/in=cheek/firmly
maybe we need a hardcopy for "evidence" are photocopies allowed in court as
evidence?
but why didn't they go the whole hog - why not use e-mail or VTX or bookreader
(worldview) or CDA or Notes etc etc
:-)
Paul
|
2100.203 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Mon Jul 05 1993 18:38 | 12 |
| I don't think anyone will get a pay cut. My understanding
is that existing leases, and existing opter-outers will
see no change. New leases will be under the new guidelines
and new company car qualifiers will get the new reduced
figure.
That's how I read the bold section on the reverse of the
letter.
Ian
|
2100.204 | sorry, wrong answer. | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Mon Jul 05 1993 18:50 | 21 |
| re .203;
>I don't think anyone will get a pay cut. My understanding
>is that existing leases, and existing opter-outers will
>see no change. New leases will be under the new guidelines
>and new company car qualifiers will get the new reduced
>figure.
>That's how I read the bold section on the reverse of the
>letter.
Section 2) says "Those employees ... who do not use all of their supplement
... will also see no immediate change. .... Again, future lease arrangements
will be based on the new Car Supplement levels"
So, you will not see a change until you replace your car. When you do,
the salary reduction takes effect. This has been confirmed to me by Human
Resources.
Peter.
|
2100.205 | At least one good side to the new scheme. | WIZZER::TRAVELL | John T, UK VMS System Support | Tue Jul 06 1993 06:36 | 46 |
| Having read the glossy a number of times, and read this string of notes, I am
of the opinion that there are only 2 significant changes.
1. The preferred supplier stuff, with (maybe) their cars significantly cheaper
than cars from other suppliers.
2. All qualified users get a cash car supplement. How much money this is depends
on job level. How much money the individual chooses to spend on a lease car
is, as always, down to that person.
The major difference I see, is that before this change, for someone level 7 or
below there was NO advantage in taking a cheap car.
e.g. (ficticious figures to illustrate what was wrong before!)
A Trabant Rolls-canardly.
Level 7 or below Free
Level 8 or above 200 pounds.
A Renough Poket-roket
Level 7 or below 10 pounds
Level 8 or above 3,010 pounds
In effect, the Level 7 or below was discouraged from taking a cheap car, because
doing so cost no less than something MUCH more expensive.
On the new scheme, EVERYONE gets the same deal, just that the lower grades can
now choose a cheap car and pocket the surplus supplement, whereas before the
change they could NOT do so.
My only nagging doubt is this, the glossy says that those people who (like me)
take ALL of the supplement as salary, and do not have a lease car at all, will
see no change. But, since everyone who DOES take a car will see a change in the
value of their supplement at the end of their current lease, I wonder just how
long it will be before those without a car also see their supplement eroded.
As far as lease car vs cash is concerned, my own calculations agree with CC's
claim that it is cheaper to have a lease car, BUT, this is true ONLY if :-
1. You intend to replace the car with new every 3 years.
2. The car you want is on the list at a price you can afford.
For myself, neither is true. I want a relatively high value car, and am quite
willing to change a second-hand model every 4 or 5 years. I cannot afford to
have a new one every 3 years.
John Travell.
|
2100.206 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jul 06 1993 13:14 | 19 |
| >My only nagging doubt is this, the glossy says that those people who (like me)
>take ALL of the supplement as salary, and do not have a lease car at all, will
>see no change. But, since everyone who DOES take a car will see a change in the
>value of their supplement at the end of their current lease, I wonder just how
>long it will be before those without a car also see their supplement eroded.
I expect it to be erroded, it was with the 495 VAT, and with the next
400 increases the car-takers got, that the cash people didn't.
>As far as lease car vs cash is concerned, my own calculations agree with CC's
>claim that it is cheaper to have a lease car, BUT, this is true ONLY if :-
>1. You intend to replace the car with new every 3 years.
>2. The car you want is on the list at a price you can afford.
I get a new car every 3 years, I can afford the lease - I don't because I can
do it cheaper outside of the scheme because I just don't do many miles, and
I'm a good insurance risk.
Heather
|
2100.207 | It all depends on how you calculate the figures. | WIZZER::TRAVELL | John T, UK VMS System Support | Wed Jul 07 1993 09:24 | 21 |
|
My calculations were based on my NOT including ANY capital at all in the purchase
of a car, then selling it after 3 years. It worked out that the cash supplement
was not sufficient to do this, and over the 3 years I would have run up an
overdraft almost exactly equal to the residual value in the car. Leaving me in a
position of: I win IF the car is in great shape, to get a good selling price,
I lose if anything adversly affects the car's resale value.
BUT... All of this ONLY applied IF I was considering exactly the same car,
either through the lease or not, and borrowing the WHOLE purchase price of the
car to be repaid over 3 years.
If I choose a second-hand car, or a cheaper car than I would have had on the
scheme, I can save a packet.
For myself. I want an ESPACE. (So I can put ALL of my Windsurf gear INSIDE!)
On the scheme, I am restricted to a NEW vehicle every 3 years. VERY expensive.
OFF the scheme, I can buy a 6 year old motor, then in 2 or 3 years buy a 5 y.o
and so-on. Eventually, I will have a saleable asset, ON the scheme this would
NEVER have occurred.
JT:
|
2100.208 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jul 07 1993 13:31 | 15 |
|
I wonder why you have to have a new car every 3 years?
The reason I ask is because mine is now 3 years old, and I have always
replaced after 3 years before.
I have the cash to do it (good old car scheme)........but I'm debating
with myself for the last few months, why I really need to trade in a
car with 36,000 miles on the clock, that is going very well.
Oh well, it's a nice decision to have to make, I just wondered about the
rigid 3 years.
Heather
|
2100.209 | Where to get insurance details | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Jul 07 1993 13:35 | 14 |
| Doug,
>>- .199 - Your Manager (assuming she/he is in the scheme) receives an
>>insurance package every start of fiscal which reminds drivers of this
>>and the other services available from insurance.
My manager has not heard of any such package. Any idea where/who I
should contact to get one for our office?
Cheers,
Greg
|
2100.210 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | The match has gone out | Wed Jul 07 1993 13:55 | 3 |
| Heather, the three years could be something to do with the MOT test.
Laurie.
|
2100.211 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jul 07 1993 14:22 | 11 |
|
> Heather, the three years could be something to do with the MOT test.
Maybe, but the MOT is pretty basic safety stuff, I had mine done with
no problem.
If it's only the MOT, then this isn't an issue for me, maybe I should
keep it longer.
Heather
|
2100.212 | Yours is coming | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Wed Jul 07 1993 14:36 | 24 |
| Re - .209
That reply should perhaps have said that every employee whose personnel
record say "Lease Car = Y" receives, at the beginning of each fiscal a
package from the insurance group containing
1) New fiscal Motor Insurance Cerificate
2) Letter of Authority to take the vehicle abroad
3) Info sheet about accident reporting, repairs, windscreens etc
4) Windscreen repair cards (like credit cards telling you who to
contact)
5) European Accident Statements - these are in short supply this year
and will be omitted.
The team are currently enveloping 4,000 of these and they are being
distributed through the internal mail system - they are personally
addressed to you by name, badge and last recorded mailstop on the
personnel system.
If you haven't got yours yet, be patient, you are insured and they are
on their way. The delay this year is a result of me taking the
insurance company negotiations to the wire to get the right price.
Doug
|
2100.213 | How about legal cover | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Jul 07 1993 14:44 | 6 |
| re .212
But Doug, that package that I'll get doesn't say anything about this
legal aid that I could be entitled too if I have an accident etc.
Greg
|
2100.214 | Could be 2 or 4 | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins @OLO | Wed Jul 07 1993 14:45 | 14 |
| > I wonder why you have to have a new car every 3 years?
>
> The reason I ask is because mine is now 3 years old, and I have always
> replaced after 3 years before.
Heather, some advice says change cars when they are 2 or 4 years
old. This is based upon money that needs spending _on average_ on
cars. At around 3 years (in general), you'll need new tyres and
exhaust, so either sell before you replace these, or derive some benefit
from the money spent.
I'd have thought 2 years would be very heavy on depreciation, though
this will depend on mileage. Maybe keep your car until it's 4 years
old.
|
2100.215 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jul 07 1993 16:42 | 18 |
| > Heather, some advice says change cars when they are 2 or 4 years
> old. This is based upon money that needs spending _on average_ on
> cars. At around 3 years (in general), you'll need new tyres and
> exhaust, so either sell before you replace these, or derive some benefit
> from the money spent.
I had new front tyres at 2 years, and a new exhaust then too
However, I was rear-ended in Feb, and had the exhaust replaced then
on the insurance.
I was thinking, from a depreciation standpoint, 4 years will be quite
a lot better than 3, and I would still have less than 45,000 on the
clock.
If I take too long deciding, it will be 4 years anyway!!!!!!
Heather
|
2100.216 | Make of of it hwat you will.. | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Wed Jul 07 1993 18:14 | 22 |
2100.217 | Further waste of money.... | SUPER7::HUGHESA | Swimming against the tide @#%* | Wed Jul 07 1993 19:45 | 14 |
|
I was please to see when searching through the internal mail trays at
the front of my bay in DECpark, two of those large envelopes, full of
expensive glossy's (and little real substance) introducing the new
Digital car scheme.
The problem is one was to somebody who has right-sized and left last
month, the second was to somebody I know takes the money.
IMHO it is bad enough that we have wasted all this money on these useless
pieces of rubbish let alone sending them to people who don't care or
cannot care about the contents !!
Andy.
|
2100.218 | | 42266::EVANSG | Gwyn Evans @IME (769-8108) | Wed Jul 07 1993 19:47 | 2 |
| I think it'd be an error not to send the details to people who are
taking the money, as it doesn't mean they can't take the car.
|
2100.219 | | WOTVAX::FIDDLERM | This is the Winter of your Mind | Wed Jul 07 1993 20:12 | 4 |
| They were sent to everyone weren't they? I got one, and I get no
allowance or car or anything.
Mikef
|
2100.220 | Might be worth a look. | KERNEL::LEYLANDS | Sharon Leyland | Wed Jul 07 1993 20:18 | 4 |
| Slight change of tac.. but I thought you may be interested. There's a
documentary on channel 4 tommorow night (9ish) about G.M. and the
effects that laying off hundreds of workers has had in the States and
the reluctance of the manager to talk about it.
|
2100.221 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 08 1993 12:59 | 12 |
|
> IMHO it is bad enough that we have wasted all this money on these useless
> pieces of rubbish let alone sending them to people who don't care or
> cannot care about the contents !!
Andy,
If you don't want one, then tell the people who sent it, I am pleased I
have one, It directly effects me, and I don't have a car.
Heather
|
2100.222 | Oh yes it does | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Thu Jul 08 1993 13:18 | 11 |
| Back to .209/.212/.213 - I quote...
"IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR LEASE CAR INSURANCE"
.......
"We handle all claims for you. Correspondence, summonses etc. should be
sent to us @REO unanswered. Legal representation for proceedings and
injury claims arising from car accidents is normally available to you
at no cost."
Doug
|
2100.223 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 08 1993 13:47 | 16 |
| > "We handle all claims for you. Correspondence, summonses etc. should be
> sent to us @REO unanswered. Legal representation for proceedings and
> injury claims arising from car accidents is normally available to you
> at no cost."
Doug, maybe you should change VTX, because your words above are much
clearer than those in VTX;
"Legal representation in cases arising from car accidents is normally
available to you at no cost through us."
Which I didn't read as leagal support for my own personal injury, but
for protection should the other driver sue.
Heather
|
2100.224 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Thu Jul 08 1993 16:52 | 13 |
| As far as I understand it, the Digital car scheme is
available to all employees regardless of whether they
get the supplement. At least that's how it used to be.
You could spend a few thousand quid on your own lease,
but do it through car fleet. Has this changed?
I think it was a good idea to send the car information
to everyone (OK, maybe not rightsized people). People
complain when they don't get information, and people
complain when they do!
Ian
|
2100.225 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 08 1993 16:53 | 5 |
|
Yup, that's true, anyone can join the car scheme, so the changes could
affect your decsion to stay out, or stay in.
Heather
|
2100.226 | There is life after all | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Thu Jul 08 1993 21:56 | 19 |
| The Digital Vauxhall Roadshow will be at:
DECpark 13 to 16 July inc.
Warrington 21 to 23 July inc.
Solent 26 to 28 July inc.
Crescent 29 & 30 July
There will be a good selection of cars from the Vauxhall range to look
at and test drive with Vauxhall staff on hand to assist.
We have selected these locations based on driver numbers in these areas
and the current availability of cars, and the Vauxhall caravan etc. I
hope we will be able to go to other locations later this quarter.
CarFleet Admin are currently sorting through approx. 400 car prices and
preparing these for VTX in an accurate format for publication as soon
as possible.
Doug
|
2100.227 | Pearlescent As Well? | CHEFS::CURRIEI | Dyslexic snice brith | Fri Jul 09 1993 01:52 | 6 |
| The letter from Craig Johnston said that we will be able to order
metallic paint at no extra cost.
I wonder if this includes 'Pearlescent' colours as well?
Ian
|
2100.228 | Any colour as long as its burgundy | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Fri Jul 09 1993 13:20 | 3 |
| Free pearlescent - YES
doug
|
2100.229 | Lease Takeovers? | CHEFS::CURRIEI | Dyslexic snice brith | Fri Jul 09 1993 22:26 | 15 |
| How will cars for takeover (where the original lease price was set
under the old scheme) be priced? The changes to the scheme mean that
the full price for a given car would go up, although this would be
offset by the discount for taking over someone else's lease.
On the one hand, leases for takeover might not look attractive enough
to consider; on the other hand, it might be the last chance to obtain a
non-Vauxhall at a half-decent price on the scheme.
Anyone planning to give up a Xantia turbo-diesel in November let me
know now!
Ian
Ian
|
2100.230 | Taxable cost? | UKARC1::CHAMBERLIN | Ian Chamberlin | Mon Jul 12 1993 18:50 | 10 |
| When the lease costs are put onto VTX, it would be
helpful if the taxable value (from next tax year) could
be included as well, to save everyone working them out
individually.
This is yet another factor in determining the real
cost of using the car scheme.
Ian.
|
2100.231 | Give us all Lada's | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Tue Jul 13 1993 01:09 | 33 |
|
One thing I noticed, that I haven't seen anybody else pick up on is
that to get the discounts proposed 70% of the fleet will have to be GM
at the moment 30% of the fleet is GM.
THerefore if we pay the extra and exercise our right to a none-GM car
and have the cars we want at a higher price, the company will not save
it's 5 mil. (a figure which has still not been explained)
So, we could end up with for instance...
30% of drivers in the GM car they wanted anyway at a reduced cost
20% of drivers in GM's they don't want...to save money
50% (majority) in cars they want at a higher price
AND STILL NOT MAKE THE 5,000,000 savings
If 30% of the fleet is GM that means 70% of drivers given the choice
don't want a GM car that is a clear majority by anybody's standard!
Richard
P.s. I don't even have the option to opt. out a local management
decision at our office says you can't.
PPS. If they really want to save money, and don't care what drivers
think why not issue us with Lada's, they are excellent value and I'm
sure they could make excellent savings even though the residual values
are low, also the income tax to the driver would be much lower.
This is a serious constructive comment, my wife has a 1.3L cat SAMARA
3dr hatch and I think I would be just as happy with a 1.5GL saloon
SAMARA as a 1.6l Cavalier at approx half the capital cost saving me
lots on my income tax.
|
2100.232 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Tue Jul 13 1993 11:38 | 8 |
| > P.s. I don't even have the option to opt. out a local management
> decision at our office says you can't.
Is that supported by your local HR management? It seems to me that a "local
management decision" without the supporting business argument isn't worth the
email it appears on. I'd challenge it.
Dave.
|
2100.233 | | BAHTAT::DODD | | Tue Jul 13 1993 12:40 | 10 |
| re .231
You may be right that if we don't achieve the 70% figure we don't
achieve the deal. What I think will happen is that 5Mill will have
passed from Digital to the employees so Digital saves 5Mill and we pay
it.
Make of it what you will.
Andrew
|
2100.234 | | MAJORS::CLIFFE | I'll warp my own space-time ... | Tue Jul 13 1993 13:28 | 11 |
|
>> The Digital Vauxhall Roadshow will be at:
>> DECpark 13 to 16 July inc.
Can somebody give us an idea of what the roadshow is like ??
Is it allday , 9-5 ??
Yes I know the blurb, but what is the reality :-)
Tom @NEW
|
2100.235 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jul 13 1993 13:37 | 6 |
|
At 8.30 this morning half of one bay was coned off (one of the most
popular parking bays) and there was a white caravan, a white corsa,
and three people there.
Heather
|
2100.236 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Tue Jul 13 1993 16:52 | 1 |
| Did you get to test drive the caravan?
|
2100.237 | | ARRODS::SYSTEM | | Tue Jul 13 1993 17:41 | 8 |
|
A friend was telling me about an article in the daily mail a few
days ago, it was about some companies saving employee and company
expenditure by issueing vouchers to buy their lease cars??
He couldn't give me much info, but it was something along the lines
of substantial tax savings?? Did anyone else see it or know about??
Stewart.
|
2100.238 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Tue Jul 13 1993 17:48 | 4 |
| Standard government issue beer vouchers will do me fine, thank you very much.
I don't care for the idea of buying a lease car though.
Dave.
|
2100.239 | Fuzzy | SUBURB::MCDONALDA | Shockwave Rider | Tue Jul 13 1993 18:15 | 15 |
| I've only been told this second hand so the details are sketchy.
There is a company which instead of giving its employees company cars
or a supplement gives them 'car' vouchers on a monthly basis. The
employees take the vouchers to companies like 'Hertz' and use them
'like money' for lease cars; naturally they contract to take a lease
car for X years for Y per month.
The reason for the vouchers is that there is no National Insurance or
VAT to be paid on them by companies. So its cheaper for the companies
concerned. The employee has to pay tax on the vouchers, but doesn't get
stung for the company car tax.
This is wot I was told,
Angus
|
2100.240 | Tax dodge | UFHIS::GVIPOND | | Tue Jul 13 1993 18:26 | 4 |
|
Simular thing can occur with Bonus payments, if you get paid in gold
bullion there's no tax payable. Its all a tax dodge. Now anyone care
to buy some very thin gold leaf ;-0
|
2100.241 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jul 13 1993 18:48 | 18 |
| Yup, I read the article (I would, wouldn't I?)
The tax dodge is the company NI. Digital don't pay the VAT (since 88)
However, the vouchers are taxed identically to money......ie as part
of your salary, at whatever your higher rate is.
So, for an employee of Digital, there would be no difference in value
to taking the money as salary (as we do today) or vouchers.....except
that the vouchers can only be used for leasing a car.
It may be more beneficial for the company, it would depend on the
exact deal done with the leasing company that exchanges the vouchers.
Which reminds me, I presume part of the 26m also includes the company
NI charges.
Heather
|
2100.242 | More grist to the mill! | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Wed Jul 14 1993 16:27 | 49 |
2100.243 | Get the blotting pads ready ... | BOOZER::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Wed Jul 14 1993 17:12 | 25 |
2100.244 | ... or maybe i need to buy the beer for Doug _before_ the ink is dry!!!! | BOOZER::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Wed Jul 14 1993 17:14 | 0 |
2100.245 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Wed Jul 14 1993 17:21 | 8 |
| Martin,
I think you are spot on. You either take less cash or a smaller cheaper
car. It's a bad reflection on our management, that they impose such a
compensation reduction on an already demoralised employee population after three
years of redundancies and virtual pay freezes. In other words, the beatings will
continue until morale improves.
Dave.
|
2100.246 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jul 14 1993 17:31 | 27 |
| I have no idea why this comes as a surprise.
Personnel have been saying that the people who take the cars are
overcompensated for a long time (and those who take the cash, less
overcompensated).
What they are doing is getting back some of that overcompensation.
I think they hoped infation would help them address the differences,
however, with the low inflation, and car purchase tax removal, this
has not helped the gap lessen.
I tried to tackle this when the writing went on the wall in 88, and
again with the cancellation of the increase from 3,000 to 3,400 but
no-one seemed interested. I think it's a bit late now.
As the car lease increases, I expect people who have the cash won't
see any of that either - as they will be "overcompensated", and I expect
this to errode to the value of the lease cars over time too.
I reconciled myself to this two years ago.
I am watching with interest to the cash and car over the next couple
of years, because it may start to be worthwile me joining the scheme
for the first time ever.
Heather
|
2100.247 | | ARRODS::SYSTEM | | Wed Jul 14 1993 17:41 | 14 |
|
Re:2100.246
We are not doing very well, I suppose we shouldn't been surprised
that we over compensated on:
PEOPLE
BUILDINGS
WAGES
and now the CAR SCHEME.
Stew.
|
2100.248 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Jul 14 1993 17:47 | 4 |
| But I've just seen a lovely purple Corsa, just the thing to save you
some money.....
:^)
|
2100.249 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jul 14 1993 18:37 | 23 |
| Well, there were vauxhall cars in most of the baskets last time,
they were
Vauxhall Cavalier 1.6l less than 8
Vauxhall Cavalier 2.0 SRI levels 8/9
Vauxhall Cavalier 2.0GLI levels 10/11
................. 2.0CDI
12+ didn't have a Vauxhall, SAAB CD XS 2.0I
Rover 820 SI
Ford Grenada 2.0 I Ghia
BMW 320 I SE
Audin 100 2.0 E
So I suppose it should be easy enough to see which ones are fairly
similar, and should come out at the standard level.
Heather
|
2100.250 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Jul 14 1993 19:23 | 22 |
2100.251 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Wed Jul 14 1993 19:25 | 4 |
| How much is the CDi list?
Cheers,
Dave.
|
2100.252 | Overcompensated my %^&* | VANTEN::MITCHELLD | "Management is opaque" | Wed Jul 14 1993 19:28 | 11 |
| They mean overpaid, so they are going to cut our pay.
Compensation ... compensate for what?
I get paid not compensated. I need compensation for
acts of gross negligence, I get paid for working,
part of the pay is the car. This was made clear when
I joined.
We dont need euphemisms as smoke screens
Clear Concise speech
Derek
|
2100.253 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Jul 14 1993 19:44 | 14 |
2100.254 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Jul 14 1993 19:49 | 7 |
2100.255 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Jul 14 1993 19:49 | 6 |
| Just out of interest are "management" still saying this is NOT a pay
cut???
Xtine
|
2100.256 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jul 14 1993 20:02 | 7 |
|
Well, it's not a pay cut for me
....I've been less overcompensated for ages :-)
Heather
|
2100.257 | "6 Seater....no can do" | CHEFS::DEBNEYN | | Wed Jul 14 1993 22:06 | 10 |
| The guy in the Vauxhall caravan in the car park here tells me neither
the Carlton estate or the Frontera has an extra seats option. No go
with Saab either I reckon.
Are there any MPV or 6+ seater vehicles in the wider GM range we could
ask Doug to consider including, otherwise those of us with more than
our fair share of offspring (I know it's self inflicted!!) will be
looking outside the new preferred list at a comparatively higher price.
Nick
|
2100.258 | Completely *UNOFFICIAL* PCL according to Royston | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Jul 14 1993 23:19 | 24 |
| Going by the prices for the LX (LS?) and SRi mentioned in .242
its interesting that they are both exactly 26% of the list price.
If this is the case then these figures may be of interest based on
this assumption (it doesn't include any insurance loading) -
Model list lease cost/driver cost
----- ---- ----------------------
Astra 2.0 SRi 4dr 13,045 3390/441
Astra 2.0 SRi 3dr 12,505 3251/301
Astra 2.0 GSi 15,320 3983/1033
Calibra 2.0i 15,855 4122/1172
Calibra 16v 17,615 4579/1629
Saab 900i 3dr 13,995 3638/688
Saab 900i SE 5dr 16,795 4366/1416
|
2100.259 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Thu Jul 15 1993 12:57 | 5 |
| Thanks Roy, but I think I'll wait till the list comes out
rather than spend hours speculating.
Ian
|
2100.260 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Thu Jul 15 1993 13:31 | 6 |
| re.259:
Ian, if you are not happy about the way these changes have been communicated,
then just say so.
Dave.
|
2100.261 | Nearly right ???? | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Thu Jul 15 1993 17:17 | 12 |
| Roy,
Interesting list, but I really believe we have to get out of the mindset of
lease cost/driver cost. From now on all indications are there will be only
lease cost vs lease allowance.
e.g. level 7 level 8
lease cost lease lease
allowance. allowance
Astra 2.0 SRi 4dr 13,045 3390 2950 3560
Richard
|
2100.262 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Thu Jul 15 1993 18:42 | 12 |
| re .260
Sorry? OK I'm not happy with the communication, but we have been
advised that the figures will be published shortly. I fail to see
why people need to spend hours and hours of their time working out
figures which are likely to be totally irrelevant when the list is
published.
That's all!
Ian
|
2100.263 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Thu Jul 15 1993 20:21 | 8 |
| re.262:
I misunderstood, I thought you were pointing out that people were worried
enough about the changes to spend hours and hours trying to work out the impact
and this could all have been avoided if the correct level of detail had been
used in the official communications.
Dave.
|
2100.264 | PRICES ON VTX NOW | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Thu Jul 15 1993 21:59 | 3 |
| Prices were up on VTX at 5:45pm Thursday 15 July.
Doug
|
2100.265 | At Last, But I've still got 30 months left! | EBYGUM::WILLIAMSH | | Thu Jul 15 1993 23:14 | 8 |
2100.266 | Add-on Goodies? | CHEFS::CURRIEI | Dyslexic snice brith | Fri Jul 16 1993 03:13 | 4 |
| Where/when can we expect to see prices for extras/accessories?
Ian
|
2100.267 | Is it really that cheap? | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jul 16 1993 13:03 | 6 |
2100.268 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Fri Jul 16 1993 13:53 | 6 |
|
The Corsa GSi list price is about the same as the Nova GSi list price, yet the
price on the scheme is 800 pounds more.
Go figure.
|
2100.269 | unbelievable... | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:21 | 19 |
2100.270 | "old" cars at DECpark | ROCKS::BUDD | I'd rather be turning | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:59 | 9 |
| Note also that the prices on VTX are for Vauxhall's 1994 models BUT the
Vauxhall road show at DEC Park has 1993 models and brochures.
What's the point of test driving "last year's" models when there are
significant changes just round the corner.
When does the 1994 range come into effect?
Martin
|
2100.271 | Specs do change... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Fri Jul 16 1993 15:44 | 6 |
| as a colleague of mine pointed out to me, Vauxhall change their specs
quire regularly.
The Cavalier LS has had the electric front windows deleted for example.
Peter.
|
2100.272 | | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Fri Jul 16 1993 17:00 | 3 |
| Martin,Where did you get the 94 specs from?.
Richard
|
2100.273 | Is this a joke? | CHEFS::MARCHR | | Fri Jul 16 1993 17:21 | 12 |
| Just read the Car List on VTX....
FLAME_ON
Not just sh***y Vauxhalls, they cost a fortune!
Has everyone gone mad - I thought it was going to be a better deal, for
the employees _and_ the Company!
FLAME_OFF
Rupert
|
2100.274 | Simply a pay cut... | CMBOOT::DELANYS | Your pessimism is my realism | Fri Jul 16 1993 17:52 | 38 |
2100.275 | Spot on... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Fri Jul 16 1993 18:08 | 6 |
| re .274;
look on the bright side - at least you can get an Astra CD without a pay cut;
I'm looking at a Corsa GLS!
Peter.
|
2100.276 | From VTX | ROCKS::BUDD | I'd rather be turning | Fri Jul 16 1993 18:08 | 9 |
| Re: .272 >> Where did you get the 94 specs from?
Page 1 of the VTX intro to the new prices:
"The Preferred Car List quotes for Vauxhall are based on their 1994
model range"
Martin.
|
2100.277 | How Much!!! | MANENG::POWELL | | Fri Jul 16 1993 18:46 | 12 |
|
Well.....I can only assume that everyone has been stunned into silence
by the prices on VTX. Come on chaps and chapesses it looks like were
loosing about 500-1000 pounds a year out of our pay packets which used
to be called a pay cut but is now probably called 'renumeration
downsizing'.
Thats it, I'm now going to go into a state of shocked silence like
everyone else.
G.P
|
2100.278 | Inconsistencies in Lease costs ? | RDGENG::GOOD | | Fri Jul 16 1993 20:04 | 19 |
2100.279 | | MARVIN::STRACHAN | Graham Strachan NEE-Reading 830-4752 | Fri Jul 16 1993 20:27 | 5 |
| Aren't there insurance loading that could make a big
different in the lease cost of two "similar" list price
cars.
Graham
|
2100.280 | Glad to see we all suffer | WOTVAX::HATTOS | I think, Therefore I'm paid less | Fri Jul 16 1993 20:35 | 15 |
| Well, can I just say it is refreshing to see that the company is
penalising ALL grades.
ALL grades can now expect a REAL pay-cut with the prices just
announced. .274 serves to illustrate this.
I have a ZX 16V which currently costs me 540. If I want a roughly
equivalent (Astra GSi 16V) it will cost me ~1300. This represents a
real cut in remuneration to me of ~760.
So like others here I will be looking at CORSA's... great foir the
company image eh? Everyone driving round in cars you can't get
equipment or customers into....
Conned.
|
2100.281 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Fri Jul 16 1993 20:39 | 17 |
2100.282 | I asked the wrong person :-) | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Fri Jul 16 1993 20:49 | 9 |
| Re the question on specs, Martin I mean't where did you get the
information about what's changing in the specs, not the fact it's based
on the 94 specs. However, re-reading I realise it was Peter who stated
something missing......
So Peter, have you detailed specs for the 94 models?
Richard
|
2100.283 | Nope, not me... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Fri Jul 16 1993 20:58 | 8 |
| re .282;
The spec re the LS losing the electric front windows is taken from the
mis-named "Drivers Choice" glossy sent to all staff. I presume this is
for the current late 93 spec.
Peter.
|
2100.284 | Looks like you can get a 2CV and loads of cash! | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Fri Jul 16 1993 21:01 | 10 |
| re .274, taking the balance as pay.
The 12 page brochure doesn't mention such mundane facts. However, the
all important accompanying letter states (front, 3rd para from bottom)
Eligible employees atall levels can then elect to choose a car at no
additional cost to them; add to their supplements from salary to lease
a higher level of car; or take a lower level of car and enhance their
salary.
Richard
|
2100.285 | OLD news! | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Fri Jul 16 1993 21:05 | 7 |
| Peter, Aren't out of sequence notes threads wonderfull?) the drivers
choice brochure is dated APRIL 93, so is in fact EARLY 93 specs, and is
the SAME date as the complete brochure.
I visited a dealer today, and they've no news of any changes.
Richard
|
2100.286 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Fri Jul 16 1993 21:48 | 9 |
| A lot of unhappy people discussing this... anybody form "they who made
the decisions" going to address these concerns???
We were told by our manager that his understading was that current
employees would not receive a cut in benefits...
Xtine
|
2100.287 | Ford and Rover rumour ! | RDGENG::GOOD | | Fri Jul 16 1993 22:14 | 8 |
| Rumour heard in the street ?
Ford and BAe(Rover) are not very happy with DEC's new car scheme,
a GM only one.
"If you are not going to buy your fleet cars from us,
then why should we buy computer systems/IT solutions from you."
|
2100.288 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Sat Jul 17 1993 00:52 | 12 |
2100.289 | | ROCKS::BUDD | I'd rather be turning | Mon Jul 19 1993 12:53 | 20 |
| Re: .285 >>> I visited a dealer today, and they've no news of any
changes.
I checked with the Vauxhall Customer Information Desk at Luton, there
response was:
The current price list is dated June 1993 (not March as handed out at
the Roadshow.)
The 1994 model range probably won't become effective until September
but there are variations available to order now that are not included
on the main model catalogues, ie Diamond etc. This probably explains
why some of the models listed in VTX are not in the March 1993 price
list.
Buyer beware! Check the latest specs before you order!
Martin.
|
2100.290 | specs changed in March, then... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Mon Jul 19 1993 13:13 | 10 |
2100.291 | Competitive Quotes? | CHEFS::CURRIEI | Dyslexic snice brith | Mon Jul 19 1993 13:31 | 10 |
| Question: If I want a quote on a non-GM motor, will Car Fleet still get
two competing quotes from different lease companies? I know from
experience that there can be very large variations between prices for
identical cars from Hertz and PHH. Getting competitive quotes will
help to keep the price down. If we only go to one company (presumably
Hertz), this will be yet another factor driving up the cost of leasing
the car that I really want.
Ian
|
2100.292 | I hope not | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Jul 19 1993 13:44 | 12 |
| >Rumour heard in the street ?
>
>Ford and BAe(Rover) are not very happy with DEC's new car scheme, a GM
>only one.
I would hope the 'buyers' in these companies are more mature than that.
Assuming we had to go with one vendor, we would always upset the other
vendors.
Greg
|
2100.293 | They did it to us for years... | WOTVAX::HATTOS | I think, Therefore I'm paid less | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:07 | 24 |
| <<< Note 2100.292 by BAHTAT::HILTON "Beer...now there's a temporary solution" >>>
-< I hope not >-
>>Rumour heard in the street ?
>>
>>Ford and BAe(Rover) are not very happy with DEC's new car scheme, a GM
>>only one.
>I would hope the 'buyers' in these companies are more mature than that.
>Assuming we had to go with one vendor, we would always upset the other
>vendors.
Why is this any different from the way both these companies have done
business with us in the past? They quite rightly push us on
price/delivery for kit and services. Seems they don't like it when its
done back to them.
I still feel we are being ripped off, but it is interesting that we are
pushing back in this particular way.
Also I heard that Rover and Ford when faced with the GM quote walked
away from the business, basically refusing to modify their quotes.
Stuart
|
2100.294 | Broken calculator | LARVAE::WILLIAMS_G | | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:37 | 30 |
2100.295 | No matter how you slice it, it still stinks ... | BOOZER::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NTCC, Birmingham UK | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:46 | 68 |
2100.296 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:49 | 19 |
2100.298 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Jul 19 1993 17:03 | 3 |
| re .297
Read thje conference notice! Quotes are in 1538
|
2100.299 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Jul 19 1993 17:05 | 7 |
2100.300 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Jul 19 1993 17:21 | 6 |
| Re : .297 (deleted by the author I assume) & .298
I have amended the conference notice to point to the new "quotes note"
2120.
Royston
|
2100.301 | Try again... | BOOZER::LOWEY | Cut Red Wire. First Removing Detonator | Mon Jul 19 1993 17:23 | 4 |
| Ooops. As you may have gathered, before I deleted it .297 suggested
we start a note in here for non-GM quotes.
Nige L.
|
2100.302 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Jul 19 1993 17:31 | 15 |
2100.303 | VAUXHALL 21ST JUNE LIST | FAILTE::THOMSONS | | Mon Jul 19 1993 17:49 | 35 |
2100.304 | Fleets are excluded... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Mon Jul 19 1993 18:11 | 4 |
| re the 30 day exhange plan - fleets are specifically excluded, so this is
one benefit you don't have.
Peter.
|
2100.305 | off the wall | MANENG::POWELL | | Mon Jul 19 1993 18:23 | 17 |
|
I believe the company wants to save about 5 million (ha) and the cost
is currently 26 million a year (ha). S'pose you take 4000 employees
with cars and give them 21 million/4000 that gives 5250 per person per
year, fine for my purposes!. Now I know there are tax advantages
(for the company) of company cars etc etc but it would solve a load of
problems and close the issue once and for all. Just an idea.
Ah but 'they' might consider this a pay rise (look it up) and this
would be a good excuse for freezing pay for another 3 years. Then
what? Desk rental, admission charges, bonus schemes (look it up!).
Perhaps its not such a good idea afterall.
Pissed off of Warrington.
|
2100.306 | | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | Andy Carter..(The Turtle Moves!) | Mon Jul 19 1993 19:45 | 8 |
|
___
__m__(O O)__m_
U
Wot, no Astra convertible on the PCL?
|
2100.307 | ...resorting to abuse. | MILE::JENKINS | Suitably refreshed | Tue Jul 20 1993 12:01 | 3 |
2100.308 | Moderate action | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Tue Jul 20 1993 13:50 | 4 |
| I have set the previous reply hidden as I feel no-one needs to resort to
swearing no matter what they feel about the new scheme.
Richard
|
2100.309 | We're supposed to be all equal! :-) | BLKPUD::WILLIAMSH | | Tue Jul 20 1993 17:22 | 12 |
| RE .294
>If the company really want to save money then why not look at all
>those people who get 'perk' company cars.
I infer from this that you have a job where transport is a requirement.
Why a 16V Cavalier? Won't a 1.6 LS do?
Why is there a differential for level 8 and above? is it:
>in order to maintain some long gone equality with other companies?
Huw.
|
2100.310 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jul 20 1993 17:24 | 16 |
|
Well, looking at the basket of cars for the levels over last few years,
the supplement now equals what the cars in the basket cost.
less than 8 Cavalier 1.6L 2950
8/9 Cav. 2.0 SRI 3560
10/11 Carlton 2.0GLI 4460
12+ Carlton CDX 2.0I 4940 (basket list was SAAB
CDX 2.0I)
The amount it costs to lease these cars is less, probably due to the
removal of car tax and suchlike.
The cars haven't changed, they're the same as they've always been.
Heather
|
2100.311 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Jul 20 1993 17:35 | 5 |
|
One of the suchlike was the intertest rate lowering.
Heather
|
2100.312 | ; ^ ) | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Wed Jul 21 1993 16:32 | 6 |
| >>> One of the suchlike was the intertest rate lowering.
^^^^^^^^^
What is an intertest rate please?
Malcolm.
|
2100.313 | :-) | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jul 21 1993 17:23 | 4 |
|
Pah
|
2100.314 | So what about it being cheaper then? | VIVIAN::T_SMITH | | Wed Jul 21 1993 18:21 | 19 |
2100.315 | I thought I'd share this with you! | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jul 21 1993 18:53 | 24 |
2100.316 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Jul 21 1993 19:47 | 12 |
| In that case as has happened the cash supplement should also be
reduced. But why does this only affect new opt-outs or new employees
not everybody???
Alright, perhaps give currently opted out people 18 months before
reducing the amount (averaging the lease time before the changes will
affect those in the scheme), but at some point in the future they
should also be affected by these changes...
Xtine
|
2100.317 | I have a FY93 base car | SUBURB::VEALES | One vote short of a quorum | Wed Jul 21 1993 20:11 | 8 |
2100.318 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Jul 21 1993 20:15 | 9 |
2100.319 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jul 21 1993 20:16 | 26 |
| > In that case as has happened the cash supplement should also be
> reduced. But why does this only affect new opt-outs or new employees
> not everybody???
I'm not sure, probably along the same lines that increase from 3000 to
3,400 was only given to those who took the car, not to those who
took the cash.
> Alright, perhaps give currently opted out people 18 months before
> reducing the amount (averaging the lease time before the changes will
> affect those in the scheme), but at some point in the future they
> should also be affected by these changes...
It's not par for the course, the 400 rise given to the people who
take the car still hasn't been passed on to the people who take the
cash.........and that was 3 years ago.
Would you have this 400 taken from the people who take the car now?
I mean, it's been much more than 18 months.
Or, would you give this 400, backdated for 3 years, to those who take
the cash, continue to pay it for the 18 months, then put everyone level?
(and that's not including the VAT differences)
Heather
|
2100.320 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jul 21 1993 20:20 | 12 |
2100.321 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Jul 21 1993 21:53 | 24 |
2100.322 | Vauxhall Lease | RDGENG::GOOD | | Wed Jul 21 1993 22:40 | 10 |
|
A Vauxhall "Choices 123" Lease Scheme can be cheaper than the
DEC Lease scheme !!!!!!
I started a new note for this see Note# 2123
Regards... Bryan
|
2100.323 | Old car scheme quote. | PEKING::NASHD | | Thu Jul 22 1993 12:28 | 5 |
| If anyone is interested, I got my quote requests in the day before
the scheme changed and have just had the first one back.
For a Ford Mondeo 1.8 GLX the driver price is 498 pounds, I'm a
recipient of the car/market supplement, or whatever it's called.
|
2100.324 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 22 1993 12:59 | 40 |
2100.325 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Thu Jul 22 1993 14:06 | 16 |
2100.326 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 22 1993 14:45 | 18 |
|
> Just because non-car takers where unjustly treated last time it does
> not make it OK for car-takers to be unjustly treated this time...
> better that everyone is fairly and evenly compensated every time...
"at that time" has actually been for the last 5 years........and
will continue to some degree for the next three, untill all the old
leases have gone.
Taking the overcompensation for 5 years, and then getting upset when
you loose it, and want it forced on everyone else, hardly sounds fair
to me.
If you want to make it just, do it for everyone now, cash and car, not
just when leases expire, and recompense those that have been "less
overcompensated" for their shortfall.
Heather
|
2100.327 | It affects <70% | MANWRK::SWCA06::HESLOP | | Thu Jul 22 1993 16:50 | 9 |
2100.328 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Thu Jul 22 1993 18:31 | 21 |
| re .327
The impression I got was that for most models you don't have to add as
much to the 2950 as you would have had to add to the 3400 previously?
re.326
Heather, I am more than happy for you all to have the difference back
sounds to me like there weren't too many people affected by that
though... judging by the fact you are probably the only person I have
ever seen complaining about being "less overcompensated" - admittedly
you have been complaining regularly for the last, what was it? 5
years...
Maybe if more people had kicked up a fuss then "those in the know"
would have been less likely to make changes to the scheme expecting
everyone just to accept with no complaints...
Xtine
|
2100.329 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 22 1993 18:56 | 35 |
| Everone who was level 8 and above, and taking the cash was affected.
How many actually knew they were affected is another matter.
It's a bit like the pension scheme change for women last year.
All women 26.6 or over (if they fund 50ths) or 20 or over (if they fund
60ths) when they started work with Digital were affected......if they
can't interpret the implications of the change, written on a loose
leaf piece of paper in with the yearly report, they won't find out
"till they retire....on a much smaller pension than they think.
The change - normal retirement for women is now 65, it was headed
"equality", and said it said in black and white (well cream) it would
have no effect on pensions.
It took 6 months of letters to-and-fro with personnel and the actuaries
before they agreed on my statements of the affect it would have.
The same will happen with variable compensation, your variable bit
won't be included in the "2/3rds of salary".......but how many people
have written to personel about that either?
And who will get all the surplus in the pension plan?
Personnaly, I think it's all very badly managed, without any thought to
the people in the company.
The fact that hardly anyone has complained before, would probably
lead them to believe we wouldn't notice again.
However, the logic is there from 88, what they have done is consistent
with the changes made then.
I fully expect the change in the pension plan of the NRD to 65 to be
the base for changes in the pension in future, it's as plain as
the car changes in 88.......but whose saying it's not on?
Heather
|
2100.330 | Brain addled on supplement issue... | CMBOOT::DELANYS | Your pessimism is my realism | Thu Jul 22 1993 20:09 | 13 |
2100.331 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jul 22 1993 20:44 | 20 |
2100.332 | Choice for all reduced | MANWRK::SWCA06::HESLOP | | Thu Jul 22 1993 21:46 | 9 |
| re. 328
Yes the new scheme IF you want a vauxhall and IF you want to pay extra out
of your own pocket its better. But the choice of cars that can be obtained
at 'zero cost' has been reduced, to get another manufacturers car it will
cost more due to reduction of the allowance.
The element of choice that was given as the great advantage when I joined
Digital has been curtailed.
Brian
|
2100.333 | Anybody for a pay cut!, come on put your hands up! | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Fri Jul 23 1993 02:36 | 13 |
|
The last line of the last note sums it up beautifully,
The car scheme and the choice it offered at the price it offered was
part of the compensation package that we took when we joined the
company.
This has been drastically altered to our loss, it is exactly the same
as a salary cut!
Richard
|
2100.334 | Inconsistencies in lease prices... | CMBOOT::DELANYS | Your pessimism is my realism | Fri Jul 23 1993 16:13 | 22 |
2100.335 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Jul 23 1993 17:01 | 17 |
2100.336 | Wierd! | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jul 23 1993 17:30 | 25 |
| There are some REAL strange prices on the PCL, ie:
Cavaliers:
208 V6 2.5I 4DR SAL + 5DR H/B 4584
210 V6 2.5I AUTO 4DR SAL + 5DR H/B 4668
18 SRI 2.0I 4DR SAL + 5DR H/B 3560
220 SRI 2.0I 16V 4DR SAL + 5DR H/B 4120
I would expect the V6 to be alot more expensive than the 16v SRi
Also the Calibra's
310 16V 2.0I 3DR COUPE
CLOTH 4072
" " " " LEATHER 4192
312 TURBO 16V 4 X 4 2.0I 3DR COUPE CLOTH 4912
" " " " " " LEATHER 5008
They just don't make sense when you look at list prices.
Greg
|
2100.337 | | BLKPUD::WILLIAMSH | | Fri Jul 23 1993 17:53 | 8 |
| Yes, but the Calibra has a very high resale value. If you look in auto
trader, second hand G-reg 16Vs are fetching 7 to 8 Grand.
Huw.
P.S. the V6 engine is very nice. They had a demonstrator up here in
Warrington with the Roadshow. I only hope they'll put it into a
Calibra.
|
2100.338 | Who's problem is it DEC's or .... | UBOHUB::BELL_A1 | still they want more | Fri Jul 23 1993 19:17 | 15 |
|
What can I say... atleast when all those people that only work for
this company because of the car they drive finally leave, not only will
the redundancies stop (because, so it seems, we'll need to hire more
to compensate for all those that are going to leave), but we will have
a work force that WANTs to work here, and WANTs to make DIGITAL EQUIP
CO. profitable again. From what I recall the lease scheme entitles all
those people that are entitled to a car (whether they need it or not)
to a 1.6L Cavalier/Sierra size saloon/hatchback vehicle without any
further payment from the employee, Has this changed, do you now have to
pay extra for a 1.6l cavalier....NO you don't, so from the company
perspective nothings changed.
Alan
|
2100.339 | Human nature | MIACT::RANKINE | | Fri Jul 23 1993 22:06 | 21 |
2100.340 | Manufacturing Say!! | KIRKTN::DGAMBLES | | Sun Jul 25 1993 14:36 | 4 |
|
Re- 338.
HERE HERE!
|
2100.341 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Mon Jul 26 1993 14:16 | 8 |
| Still the Frontera prices are not shown. It still says that they will appear
"in the next few days".
I wonder if there is any truth to the rumour that the reason they are not
there is that if the Cavalier price changes upset people, the huge increase
in the Frontera prices was really going to cause some fun.
M.
|
2100.342 | Don't hold your breath though :-) | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Jul 26 1993 14:23 | 5 |
| Someone in our group contacted car fleet this morning.
They say that all TBA prices, Saabs, Fronteras and option prices should
be available "early this week". Maybe even today.
Royston
|
2100.343 | quote... | ARRODS::SYSTEM | | Mon Jul 26 1993 16:09 | 5 |
|
FYI: on the old scheme a quote for an employee below level 8, on a
bog standard Frontera 2.0 Sport was an additional 258 pounds.
Stew.
|
2100.344 | It's not about working for DEC because of the car.. | CMBOOT::DELANYS | Your pessimism is my realism | Mon Jul 26 1993 16:41 | 12 |
| I resent .338's comments, and can only assume they come from someone
who is not affected by the changes.
Like many others in this discussion, I have been in the company for
many years, and consider I have been unswervingly loyal in that time,
through thick and thin. Choice of company car is a nice bonus, but I
can live with a reduced choice if required. What I can't live with is
an effective salary cut (disguised as 'saving the company money'), on
top of two years of no pay rises.
Stephen
|
2100.345 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Mon Jul 26 1993 17:11 | 5 |
| re.344:
Well said that man!
Dave.
|
2100.346 | the choice is yours.... | UBOHUB::BELL_A1 | still they want more | Mon Jul 26 1993 18:56 | 30 |
|
re .344
I can't say if the changes will effect me. My last 3 pay rises
have come and gone with out change (except the X% of inflation), but
the basic facts are that the company still provide a quality 1.6l base
car at 0.00 cost, although now, if you choose to take a care below the
cost of the base car you gain the price difference (where as before,
I believe you lost it).
It could be worse, the company could say "Here is a fleet of vehicles,
all of them are identicle, to maintain the choice factor, which one would
you like", or "at your present level you are entitled to drive this,
please enjoy it".
It just really bugs me that there seem to be so many notes saying *"I
came to work for DEC because of the car scheme, and now it's being
taken way" If you don't like it then, take your pick.., Me ? I'm
relatively happy, I have an enjoyable job ( maybe not as enjoyable as
it used to be, but it could be worse). I've been with DEC 9yrs 9months
and 26 days, I may not be "as overcompensated" as I was, but believe me
when I say that all the people that I went to school~/college with are
doing worse than I am.
Alan
key:
* This is/may not be the actual wording, but it relays the general
opinion (IMO)
~ Those that I have remained in contact with.
|
2100.347 | A DigiTemp speaks.... | PEKING::SMITHRW | Off-duty Rab C Nesbit stunt double | Mon Jul 26 1993 20:57 | 17 |
2100.348 | Frontera prices on the PCL | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Mon Jul 26 1993 21:35 | 9 |
|
Their there 2.0 i sport = 2968
2.4 i = 3760
2.3 td = 3676
They look quite reasonable to me.
Regards Martin
|
2100.349 | Frontera price, just prior to the PCL.... | SLPSTK::ILES | Mike Iles - UK Alpha Resource Centre | Tue Jul 27 1993 14:37 | 12 |
2100.350 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Jul 30 1993 18:33 | 4 |
| Saab prices are now available on VTX. They don't look like bargains
though.
Royston
|
2100.351 | It benefits the Company | WELCLU::MANRO | | Fri Jul 30 1993 19:12 | 10 |
|
re: -1.
Surprise, surprise.
Still according to a "DEC person" , there is a 20:1 ratio of employees
who support the changes to car policy.
I keep meeting the 1 and never any of the 20!!!!!!
|
2100.352 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Jul 30 1993 19:22 | 10 |
2100.353 | Finger in the air | SUBURB::VEALES | More undercompensated | Fri Jul 30 1993 19:40 | 6 |
|
It's all to do with residual value at the end of the lease...
maybe ;-)
|
2100.355 | | WIZZER::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Fri Jul 30 1993 19:55 | 6 |
| Some really good news.
An Astra GTE 16V for 2926, equivalent Astra GSi is 4312 from memory.
But I'm not telling you where so I can have it :-)
tp
|
2100.356 | Even existing leases are changing... | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Fri Jul 30 1993 21:25 | 36 |
2100.357 | Once out, always out | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jul 30 1993 21:33 | 8 |
| > I think I'm glad to be getting out of it for a year, I might not
> even rejoin!.
I thought once you are out that is it, ie you can NEVER re-join. I'm
sure I've read it somewhere...
Greg
|
2100.358 | What about the optional extras prices?? | TENTO1::BOURNEJ | EASYEDIT rules ok (G6JJK) | Sat Jul 31 1993 01:24 | 10 |
| Well it's now 30th July and no sign of the prices for the optional
extras for the Vauxhalls! I rang fleet on Wednesday morning and was
told they were typing the data in at that time, and it was expected to
be available on VTX in the afternoon or Thursday!
I have been off on a day's holiday today so haven't been able to talk
to fleet. Does anyone have any news about the optiin prices?? Or are
they there but hidden somewhere?
Jim
|
2100.359 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Mon Aug 02 1993 11:55 | 7 |
| I think the inclusion of Saab is just a token gesture to say that
we have a choice and we don't HAVE to go for Vauxhall. After all,
Saab's have been priced out of most people's reach, and fleet have
not sent out Saab details, only Vauxhall.
Ian
|
2100.360 | Takeover discounts ??? | SHIPS::BROWN_C | | Mon Aug 02 1993 15:57 | 8 |
| re .356
and what happened to the discount?
Surely it must be better to encourage people to take on these cars
before taking out new leases. Now I see no incentive at all.
- Chris -
|
2100.361 | | WARNUT::ALLEN | It works better if you plug it in.. | Mon Aug 02 1993 17:00 | 9 |
| Re a couple back
I too had heard that once out of the car scheme you could not return.
I can't find anything written to that effect though. If I go I don't
think I would want to return anyway I can get an HP/lease deal on
a Subaru legacy estate, same as the one I have now, same period 3 yrs
which is not much different to the one I pay for now. However at the
end I have a car to trade in for a new one. Then the car scheme doesn't
even come close to competing.
|
2100.362 | depends on circumstance... | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Mon Aug 02 1993 20:27 | 7 |
| I believe its true that once your out its forever... except in my case
I am taking a year off to do an MBA... so I had to come out... and I
assume if I want to I will be able to rejoin on my return...
Xtine
|
2100.363 | Ouch! | PEKING::GERRYT | | Tue Aug 03 1993 16:53 | 7 |
| Seems like the 'base' car for a level 8 or 9 is now the Astra Merit
1.7D 5dr. hatch. That's the car which would help you retain your old
'supplement' over a base car at no cost, which is quite useful for long
distance commuters like me.
However, this is in reality a 600 pound reduction in my comps.&
benefits!.
|
2100.364 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Aug 03 1993 17:20 | 7 |
|
The base car was the cavalier, I wrote this earlier.
By the looks of the price, it still is......so no reduction.
Heather
|
2100.365 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Tue Aug 03 1993 18:14 | 9 |
2100.366 | join the car fleet desperados | LARVAE::IVES_J | One i-node short of a file system | Tue Aug 03 1993 18:16 | 12 |
| I think car fleet will have to do a good deal more chasing up of people
with over due cars. In the past it was in the drivers interest to drive
car fleet because we all like to have a new car.
I'm lucky in that I received my new car in June so (theoretically) I
have 3 years before I feel the pinch. I for one will wait for car fllet
to catch me.
I used to know someone who had taken his fleet car through MOT twice
!!!!
|
2100.367 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Aug 03 1993 18:24 | 10 |
2100.368 | | SUBURB::VEALES | More undercompensated | Tue Aug 03 1993 18:25 | 10 |
| re .365
That's what I drive and that's exactly what'll happen when I renew.
From where I sit the "claims" in Computer Weekly etc are true.
:-(
When I got this "base" car on the old scheme, I didn't expect it to drop
further on the new. They seem to have redefined "base" in order to
relieve me of what I used to count as salary.
|
2100.369 | Rebel with a cheap car | SAC::HAYCOX_I | Ian | Tue Aug 03 1993 18:30 | 10 |
| re .366,
Yes I think this will be a major problem, as I believe late cars incur
quite large penalties from the leasing company. This 'hidden' cost may
well outweigh the benefits of the GM deal.
I am aware of people who have no intention of returning their cars
until asked.
Ian.
|
2100.370 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Aug 03 1993 18:35 | 11 |
| > They seem to have redefined "base" in order to
> relieve me of what I used to count as salary.
Base has NOT been redefined.
What has happened, is that over the years, the cost of the lease
has decreased, but this has not been reflected in the compensation
until now - when it's been done in one hit.
Heather
|
2100.371 | The CW story... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Tue Aug 03 1993 18:45 | 25 |
2100.372 | | SUBURB::VEALES | More undercompensated | Tue Aug 03 1993 19:20 | 13 |
2100.373 | Supplement = car + fuel ??? | SHIPS::BROWN_C | | Wed Aug 04 1993 13:54 | 16 |
| Let me pose a question on the subject of 'base car'.
If the Cavalier Sri is supposed to be the base car for level 8/9, then
shouldn't the 8/9 supplement be higher than the cost of this car?
The reason for this being that the policy on car supplements is
supposed to include an allowance to reflect competitive practice of
funding private mileage fuel as well as the car. I quote from
VTX.....
"Finally an allowance is then added to reflect competitive practice
of providing fuel for personal, social and domestic use. This final
figure then establishes the supplement given for each band."
- Chris -
|
2100.374 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Aug 04 1993 14:13 | 6 |
|
I haven't seen that, I presume this means more tax though.
I'll read the bumf again.
Heather
|
2100.375 | And finally Esther... | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Aug 04 1993 15:40 | 9 |
| Re .373
Chris,
Where is this "finally there is an allowance..." bit in VTX. I can't
seem to find it. I'd certainly like to check it out as this is news to
me (and others it appears).
Royston
|
2100.376 | Sense, of not course... | UBOHUB::ROLLINS_L | | Wed Aug 04 1993 15:51 | 21 |
2100.377 | re .374 | SUBURB::VEALES | More undercompensated | Wed Aug 04 1993 15:54 | 2 |
| The bit about "providing fuel for personal, social and domestic use" is
in the new car scheme brochure too. In section 3.
|
2100.378 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Aug 04 1993 15:56 | 4 |
| That bit about the allowance is in the letter and/or booklet everyone
got posted about the new scheme.
Greg
|
2100.379 | Guideline .NE. Policy ?? | SHIPS::BROWN_C | | Wed Aug 04 1993 16:08 | 12 |
| It seems like everyone can now find the relevant text, (the VTX text is
on the page titled 'Car Supplement', choice 3 from the '<2> Car Scheme
Guidelines' selection of car fleet VTX).
What I expect to hear next is that this is a hangover from the old
guidelines, and does not form part of the present car scheme policy.
^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^
Please, Doug, prove me wrong!
C
|
2100.380 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Pluck a Plump Plum | Wed Aug 04 1993 16:16 | 3 |
| I've mailed my manager to query this. I'll let you know the answer...
Dave.
|
2100.381 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Aug 04 1993 16:20 | 6 |
| Thanks for the pointers, I've found it now.
Surely this should be escalated as there appears to be no "allowance
added to reflect...personal fuel costs".
Royston
|
2100.382 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Aug 04 1993 16:24 | 20 |
| > My definition of "base" is the car I can get without digging into my
> "take-home" pay. This is the way I have done it ever since I joined the
> scheme (I have never used my level 8 allowance for the car... can't
> afford to).
well, the schemes definition of a base car is differnt from yours,
and it has been consistent. Over the last few years you have gained,
as Digital has not reduced the scheme in line with reduced car lease
costs....but have done it now, in one go..
The info on VTX......when I read it first, I took a different meaning,
that it was included in the lease. On second reading, I read it as it
should be included, as an additional amount.
It's a bit ambiguous. If it does mean in addition, then they
ain't doing it.
Is anyone currently talking to personell about this?
Heather
|
2100.383 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Aug 04 1993 16:26 | 5 |
|
Oh yes, and don't forget about the extra tax.....this would be a perk
and should show up on the P11D......
Heather
|
2100.384 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Aug 04 1993 16:28 | 7 |
| Heather, I guess it depends on what the company decides as a "base" car
for each level. You listed these out a while ago but I wonder if there
is an official list. If for example the base car for <level 8 is the
Cavalier 1.6i LS which does match the allowance exactly then there is
definately no "additional allowance" in evidence as all.
Royston
|
2100.385 | not a benefit in kind | SHIPS::BROWN_C | | Wed Aug 04 1993 16:34 | 13 |
| If the supplement is increased over and above the cost of the lease of
a base car, then it should not render the employee liable to a benefit
in kind tax.
1 If taken as cash, then this would be taxed as part of salary
2 if used towards a car lease cost, then this is no different to the
main part of the supplement, and is taxed as a bemefit in kind
of provision of a car. i.e. tax on 15% of what is then probably a
higher priced car.
c
|
2100.386 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Aug 04 1993 16:44 | 15 |
| > Heather, I guess it depends on what the company decides as a "base" car
> for each level. You listed these out a while ago but I wonder if there
> is an official list.
It was an official list from personel.
> If for example the base car for <level 8 is the
> Cavalier 1.6i LS which does match the allowance exactly then there is
> definately no "additional allowance" in evidence as all.
Yup, I can't see and additional allowance, which is why I asked if
anyone was taking this up with personnel. Looks like Dave Kerrell
is following the right route for an official answer.
Heather
|
2100.387 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Aug 04 1993 16:46 | 8 |
|
re .385
I was thinking of a third option, claiming it back via expenses - how
else can they relate it to private mileage?
Heather
|
2100.388 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Wed Aug 04 1993 17:02 | 11 |
| re the Cavalier/Calibra prices
The resale value is taken into account when the lease cost is
calculated. This has been mentioned in here several times. I
think the only way to get a REAL answer would be to get fleet to
get the information from the lease company, but I doubt they
will release such information.
Ian
|
2100.389 | | SHIPS::BROWN_C | | Wed Aug 04 1993 17:10 | 22 |
| re .-1
I don't think there is any intention to refund actual mileage, or
anything of the sort. My interpretation is that the supplement was
determined as being a means to attract and retain employees who could
otehrwise obtain a better benefit package elsewhere.
The base car is considered equitable to that provided by other
employers, and as these other employers often provide fuel then the
supplement had to be increased to balance this. Of course, once the IR
started taxing this fuel as a benefit in kind, the real value went
down, and for some company car drvers, this may actually be taxed to
the extent where it is no longer a benefit.
In the current climate, where there is less pressure on Digital to
provide benefits to attract and retain employees, then it may well have
been decided that the overall benefit of fuel allowance is nett zero.
This could then added to the base car lease cost to result in a
supplement which does not 'overcompensate' the employee.
- Chris -
|
2100.390 | Dealer For Northern Ireland | BELFST::TAGGART | | Wed Aug 04 1993 19:14 | 5 |
| Does anyone know which of the 4 Vauxhall dealers will be supplying Northern
Ireland and how will the cars be delivered, i.e. driven over or sent on a
transporter.
Sean
|
2100.391 | Why? | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Wed Aug 04 1993 19:47 | 8 |
| I don't understand the reference to only 4 dealers, and why send them
over, doesn't Ireland have Vauxhall dealers of it's own?.
Direct from Doug I have it that cars will be sourced as now from
whichever dealers do the deals with Hertz. There are no restrictions or
limits on who they may be.
Richard.
|
2100.392 | | WARNUT::ALLEN | It works better if you plug it in.. | Wed Aug 04 1993 19:54 | 5 |
| I think he might be alluding to something I came across.
There are many Subaru dealers in the country but Hertz only deal with
one. My local dealer knows that he can supply Digital at much cheaper
reates but he can't get a look in as a supplier...draw your own
conclusions.
|
2100.393 | All in VTX | WIZDUM::DAVE | Durelli, Gripping Stuff !!! | Wed Aug 04 1993 20:01 | 14 |
| No, VTX says that Digital will only source its Vauxhall fleet cars from 4 dealers
1 in Bristol
1 in Reading
1 in Manchester
1 in Edinburgh (I think)
So which will service Northern Ireland is a good question,
and also the method of delivery.
For more info see Car Fleet VTX
cheers
Dave D.
|
2100.394 | Northern Ireland | BELFST::TAGGART | | Wed Aug 04 1993 20:34 | 15 |
| Just to confirm that I am asking this question for the reason Dave listed
in the previouse note, i.e. the info on VTX.
The reason I ask about the delivery method is that my current car was driven
from Tunbridge Wells to Belfast via Scotland. It arrived with over 600 miles
on the clock, cigarette ash over the driver seat and dashboard, coke tins
lying in the back and the outside looking like it had been driven through
the fields. This was almost 3 years ago and since then any cars which have
been driven over have arrived in good condition so hopefully this was an
isolated incident.
Sean
P.S. How much does it cost to ship a car from the mainland to Northern
Ireland, our fleet here is approx 53 cars.
|
2100.395 | Dealers | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Thu Aug 05 1993 14:15 | 5 |
| About dealers - I understand that Hertz have appointed a dealer in
Belfast - unfortunately, his name escapes me for the moment. We are
also working on the dealer network to get best coverage.
Doug
|
2100.396 | No - they wouldn't do that. | BAHTAT::DODD | | Thu Aug 05 1993 15:57 | 14 |
| re .376 price anomalies.
I have a copy of Fleet car June 1993 which has lots of tables in it.
For Calibra 16V depreciation is given at 18.72ppm for 4yr 60,000miles
For Cavalier Sri 12.54ppm for 4yr 60k
Depreciation is defined as difference between purchase and residual
divided by mileage. They don't list the turbos or trim vaiants. I don't
think .388 suggestion of residual value answers this anomaly. I wonder
if the calibra is cheap or the cavalier expensive because it's more
popular.
Andrew
|
2100.397 | Roadshow Data --> | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Thu Aug 05 1993 20:34 | 20 |
|
Results of Digital Vauxhall Ride & Drive Roadshows
Reading over 4 days 384 Test Drives
Warrington 3 days 273 Test Drives
Fareham 2 Days 193 Test Drives
Basingstoke 2 Days 315 Test Drives
Total 11 Days 1,165 Test drives
Particular interest shown in Frontera, Calibra, Cavalier V6 and all
Turbo Diesel models.
Vauxhall tell us this is the best they have done and are very pleased
to have put the effort into the Roadshows.
Doug
|
2100.398 | Not so in the Reading show | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Thu Aug 05 1993 20:52 | 11 |
| >> <<< Note 2100.397 by CHEFS::ARNOLD >>>
>> Particular interest shown in Frontera, Calibra, Cavalier V6 and all
>> Turbo Diesel models.
It would have been usefull if the Cavalier Turbo-diesel had been available
on the Reading show. I heard others apart from me also making the same
request.
Richard
|
2100.399 | | NEWOA::FIDO_T | Conation is the key | Fri Aug 06 1993 12:19 | 5 |
| I heard on the radio this morning that Vauxhall workers are being given
an extra week's holiday this year as demand for new cars is lower than
expected.
Terry
|
2100.400 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Fri Aug 06 1993 13:34 | 8 |
| Heard on TV this morning...
Vauxhall now have 52% market share... so 1 in 4 new cars are Vauxhalls?
(why isn't in 1 in 2??)
Xtine
|
2100.401 | NEW CAR ORDER FORM | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Fri Aug 06 1993 13:55 | 9 |
| There is an error on the new Car Order Form in declaration 4 on the
front of the form. The words "and indemnify Digital against any
additional expense arising therefrom" will be deleted in the next print
run.
Anyone using the current issue form ref CFAJB 7/93 can delete these
words when ordering.
Doug
|
2100.402 | VAUXHALL OPTION PRICES | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Fri Aug 06 1993 13:56 | 6 |
| The Driver Prices for Vauxhall Options have been ready for VTX for some
days, but we have a problem with getting the information up on VTX. We
are working to solve this problem and will publish the prices as soon
as possible.
Doug
|
2100.403 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Aug 06 1993 14:07 | 3 |
| Thanks Doug for keeping us informed.
Royston
|
2100.404 | | MILE::JENKINS | Suitably refreshed | Fri Aug 06 1993 14:26 | 12 |
|
Re : the Vauxhall info.
Demand for the Cavalier is reported to be much lower than last year
and those working on Cavalier production lines have been put on short
time working (3 weeks/month) until Christmas. (Autocar & Motor)
Vauxhall don't have 52% of the new car market. I'd be surpised if
it was even 25%.
Richard.
|
2100.405 | transposition error | MARVIN::ROBINSON | NCL on a PC | Fri Aug 06 1993 14:51 | 9 |
| re .400
> Vauxhall now have 52% market share... so 1 in 4 new cars are Vauxhalls?
> (why isn't in 1 in 2??)
reverse digits and 52% becomes 25% -> 1/4 or one in four
Dave
|
2100.406 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Aug 06 1993 15:12 | 6 |
| I've just received a new car order form and the famous 'front floor
mats' are no longer included as a default extra.
Do the new cars come with front mats as standard these days anyway ?
Royston
|
2100.407 | all included | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Fri Aug 06 1993 16:15 | 5 |
| Royston
Yes - naturellement - Floor mats are standard and FREEEEEEEEEE !!
Doug
|
2100.408 | How much extra :^) | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Aug 06 1993 16:41 | 4 |
| ...so if we submit a quote for a non GM car (horror) we have to specify
floor mats or not?
Greg
|
2100.409 | what about us? | TRUCKS::BUSHEN_P | Reproduced without protection | Fri Aug 06 1993 16:51 | 8 |
| >
> I heard on the radio this morning that Vauxhall workers are being given
> an extra week's holiday this year as demand for new cars is lower than
> expected.
>
does this mean we get an extra week :-)
|
2100.410 | Re.398 | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Fri Aug 06 1993 17:48 | 18 |
|
>>> It would have been usefull if the Cavalier Turbo-diesel had been available
>>> on the Reading show. I heard others apart from me also making the same
>>> request.
>>> Richard
I would echo that too, Richard!
Malcolm.
Re.407
>>>Yes - naturellement - Floor mats are standard and FREEEEEEEEEE !!
Can I just have the Floor Mats Doug, You can have the Vauxhall
8^)
|
2100.411 | Free for all mats | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Fri Aug 06 1993 19:31 | 23 |
|
Yawn Yawn - Floor mats are free for all even those who go for a Non GM
car.
Now for those rubber fetishists who only want the mats........
It must be Friday
Isn't it?
Please ?
Pretty please .............
|
2100.412 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Aug 06 1993 19:59 | 2 |
| No it's MONDAY Doug, and there's a stack of quotes to start
processing...
|
2100.413 | my list | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Fri Aug 06 1993 20:16 | 5 |
| OK back to the list... now where was I ??
H ??
Ah Hilton, Yes red cirrcle round his name
|
2100.414 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Aug 06 1993 20:17 | 6 |
| re 413
Nah, can't get me on that one Doug, mine get's renewed in 96, so I
expect the car scheme to have changed by then.
;^)
|
2100.415 | Here's my 2d worth | YUPPY::SACKMANJ | I was dreaming of the past... | Mon Aug 09 1993 21:29 | 29 |
| Dipping in now and then, it has taken me nearly a week to read this
topic!! What occurs to me is the following:
Lots of grumbles about loss of pay, loss of prestige car etc etc. No
one has asked what can be done about it. The folks in CARS_UK
generally tend to be fairly spirited but all I've seen is lots of
tooing and froing between "I'm losing lotsa dosh" and "Well I'm not, so
how can you be" and lots of evidence both ways.
Yes, I'm a level 8. Yes, I'll lose out. Nowhere here does anyone
suggest what to do, except "speak to my manager, but he'll be getting
done same as me!"
Digital spokesperson says "20 people happy with new scheme, 1 not"
Did ANYONE here get polled about their feelings? No one here (Learning
Services, James Watt House) did.
20 to 1. Hmmm.. if they polled everyone, 215 people dissented
So what does one do? Leave, (try getting a job!)
Complain (who to, and would they listen?)
Checkmate....
Jon
|
2100.416 | It made me smile. | BAHTAT::DODD | | Tue Aug 10 1993 12:21 | 12 |
| I put up the latest Digital Unix poster, the one which shows a Model T
Ford (?) in a browny green landscape captioned "Their Unix". Below is a
custom car/drag all chrome and fat tyres captioned "Our Unix".
Some office wisecrack, no not me, has recaptioned this as "The Car
scheme is" and "The Car scheme was".
I leave it as an exercise for the readers as to which caption matches
which picture.
Andrew
|
2100.417 | Proper cost comparison? | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Aug 10 1993 13:02 | 8 |
| Now the cheaper add-ons have been published, has anyone actually
compared full prices, for example:
16v Calibra + metallic paint + air conditioning = 4072+(95*3)=4357
What would this cost you on the old scheme?
Greg
|
2100.418 | From VTX | WIZDUM::DAVE | Durelli, Gripping Stuff !!! | Tue Aug 10 1993 14:27 | 9 |
| From VTX I read
16V Calibra with Cloth Trim is 4072
Metallic Paint FREE
Air Conditioning 95
Where do you get the 3 * 95 from ?
Durelli
|
2100.419 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Aug 10 1993 14:29 | 7 |
| > Where do you get the 3 * 95 from ?
95 is an annual price, so a 3 year lease is 3* 95.
I think ;^)
Greg
|
2100.420 | | BAHTAT::DODD | | Tue Aug 10 1993 14:45 | 11 |
| Greg,
All these numbers are annual driver price so you should have only
counted the 95 pounds once.
I have a nearly 3 year old 16V Calibra with ABS and aircon. I pay 1900
per year, but I took it over part way (Terry Clarks car) so the real
cost was 2800ish. ABS is now standard. What we really need is a just
prior to July quote/lease.
Andrew
|
2100.421 | VTX nitpick | SUBURB::VEALES | More undercompensated | Tue Aug 10 1993 14:50 | 2 |
|
The Car Fleet VTX pages have a digital logo with a capital "D".
|
2100.422 | Old Calibra Quotes | WIZDUM::DAVE | Durelli, Gripping Stuff !!! | Tue Aug 10 1993 15:11 | 16 |
| Searched the conference for old cailbra quotes under the old scheme, got...
Mar 93 16V models 1192 and 1093
Jan 93 8V for 1069, 16V for 1606
May 92 8V 1774
Jul 92 16V 2264
There are also quotes for Turbo's
3105 with leather, 2446 for cloth.
Seems like a wide varition over all.
There is also mention of a fresh air filter for 15 quid. What is this ?
Durelli
|
2100.423 | Filters the cabin air | SYSTEM::BOOTHE | The Oyster Freak DTN 830-3092 | Tue Aug 10 1993 17:41 | 9 |
|
<<There is also mention of a fresh air filter for 15 quid. What is this ?
If this is this same as on my car, then it's a piece of gauze which is placed
over the air intake (for the cabin interior). The gauze traps any dirt and
so you get filtered air inside the car. The gauze strips need to be replaced
every 3 months.
Karen
|
2100.424 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Tue Aug 10 1993 18:53 | 5 |
| Well, its interesting to see a few quotes coming in (2120.*).
The Golf looks a bit pricey !
Royston
|
2100.425 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Aug 10 1993 19:00 | 3 |
| Is that Golf Quote for the VR6, if not WOW!
:^o
|
2100.426 | It's a GTi | EBYGUM::WILLOUGHBYD | The man with no personal name | Tue Aug 10 1993 19:27 | 10 |
2100.427 | depreciation appreciation | EBYGUM::WILLOUGHBYD | The man with no personal name | Tue Aug 10 1993 19:33 | 4 |
| Actually, thinking about it. I bet it's the depreciation on GTi's these days
that done it,
Dave
|
2100.428 | We hav vays of making you choose Vauxhall... | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Aug 11 1993 13:24 | 3 |
| The quotes are outrageous... exactly as I expected...
Xtine
|
2100.429 | Random numbers again | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Wed Aug 11 1993 16:01 | 8 |
| What's worse is they're still not consistent:
My quote in .5 was a Citroen XZ Aura Turbo diesel price 12,330 quote 3668
The quote in .6 is a Mondeo GLX Turbo diesel Price (*) 13,155 quote 3456
* I'm not certain of the Mondeo 1.8 TD GLX price, this is the 1.8i GLX
price.
Richard
|
2100.430 | | TUSCK::kalus | | Wed Aug 11 1993 16:31 | 11 |
| re .429
>> * I'm not certain of the Mondeo 1.8 TD GLX price, this is the 1.8i GLX
>> price.
The Mondeo 1.8TD models are priced the same as the 1.8 petrol models.
The quotes I got (for the Mondeo and Montego diesel estates) are in line with what
I was expecting under the old scheme, if I could have got the quotes in on time!
Chris.
|
2100.431 | Missing Quotes | FAILTE::THOMSONS | | Wed Aug 11 1993 17:01 | 9 |
| Doug ,
Can you please display the quotes from LM00001 to LM00030 there are some
in Note 2120 but I am at the end of my lease and rather that send in for my 2
quotes if the prices are on the HIGH side then it will be a Vauxhall.
P.S. Any idea when the TBA on the PCL will be posted.
Stuart
|
2100.432 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Aug 11 1993 17:19 | 10 |
2100.433 | Expensive Xantia Quote | DOOMED::CLARKM | | Wed Aug 11 1993 17:21 | 12 |
2100.434 | Floor Mats | CHEFS::CURRIEI | Dyslexic snice brith | Sun Aug 15 1993 03:07 | 28 |
| Re .406/.407 on the subject of floor mats
(Sorry about the delay, I've been on holiday...)
Doug,
Can we insist that the 'free' front floor mats are manufacturers'
fitted mats and _not_ generic Hertz mats. This is a 'hot button' with
me as I had a bad experience with generic mats (PHH as it happens) when
one of them 'migrated' around the floor well (of a Cavalier) and caused
the accelerator pedal to jam in the open position. Luckily I was
stationary at the time, so no damage done.
I wrote to Pam Dormer at the time and she was 'horrified' at what had
happened and promised to take it up with PHH. Nothing happened. I
raised the subject with Car Fleet at a later date, but again nothing
happened. (I think there is a whole Note on this subject - to which I
contributed! - buried somewhere in this Conference, but my knowledge of
Notes is not sufficient to enable me to rediscover it quickly.)
I will not now use generic mats under any circumstances. As an
additional factor, the Cavalier CD (in which I had the problem) came
with two layers of carpet as standard (and probably still does). The
last thing it needs is a _third_ layer of carpet. What it needs is a
fitted rubber mat.
Ian
|
2100.435 | Competitive Quotes - Not | CHEFS::CURRIEI | Dyslexic snice brith | Sun Aug 15 1993 03:15 | 11 |
2100.436 | Cabriolets? | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Aug 16 1993 18:16 | 5 |
| Will soft top cars, ie the new Astra ever appear on the PCL?
Cheers,
Greg
|
2100.437 | There is ONE already there ..... 103 CONVERTIBLE 2.0I DR 3964 | SUPER7::HUGHESA | Swimming against the tide @#%* | Mon Aug 16 1993 18:28 | 0 |
2100.438 | I'll have two of them | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | Andy Carter..(The Turtle Moves!) | Mon Aug 16 1993 18:47 | 1 |
| no, no, no, no. I think Greg meant one people can actually afford :-)
|
2100.439 | should be re: 435 ! | VANGA::KERRELL | Pluck a Plump Plum | Tue Aug 17 1993 12:16 | 8 |
| re.43:
Ian,
you are right about the mats, they can be dangerous. Only proper fitting
mats should be used. I can also remember this subject coming up before, I'm
suprised it's still unresolved.
Dave.
|
2100.440 | Time to jump! | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Tue Aug 17 1993 13:30 | 23 |
| Now's the time to come clean: I'm considering defecting from the
scheme, Jumping out and buying my current lease car.
OK, I know that for the money you get you can't get an equivalent deal
on a brand new car. However I don't consider I really need a new car
anyway.
I sort of think this every time my lease is up, but the latest changes
have really pushed me over the edge. I cannot get even moderately
interested in driving a Vauxhall, not that they aren't good and
competent cars. It's just that I find them boring.
This is the problem with any single source scheme, some will be happy,
those that would have chosen Vauxhall anyway. Some will be content,
those that don't rerally have any great preference. But those that
have a passion for cars and have an allegance to another mark will
find the imposition hard to take.
I've done the figures, got insurance quotes, and the one outstanding
variable is the price going to be charged for the purchase of my
end-of-lease car.
Richard
|
2100.441 | Ridiculous.... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Tue Aug 17 1993 20:54 | 16 |
2100.442 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Wed Aug 18 1993 14:09 | 18 |
2100.443 | Should you take the car or cash ? | WIZDUM::DAVE | Durelli, Gripping Stuff !!! | Wed Aug 18 1993 15:59 | 23 |
| there's a book called
Car or Cash
which includes advice from
Coopers and Lybrand
is priced at
4.99
and is avialable from
CCH editions
Telford Road
Bicester
Oxfordshire
OX6 0XD
Tel: 0869-247864
There out of stock at the mo, but, I've ordered one and I'll post a review soon.
|
2100.444 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Wed Aug 18 1993 16:09 | 6 |
| I didn't think the cabrio price was too bad considering it's 15,800 quid and
the insurance is probably quite high. It's only a bit more than a similar
priced 8v Calibra - which everyone seems to be saying is a really good deal!
Ian
|
2100.445 | It was a put up job from the start... | HEWIE::RUSSELL | I'm not a free man, I'm a QS-PRMU9-04. | Wed Aug 18 1993 20:52 | 25 |
| Now, let me be careful in what I say here.
After using the official managment chain to escalate my concerns about the
implementation of the new car scheme, specifically the supplement reduction,
and after a presentation over this to Chris Conway,
I "understand" that the BOM were told, and approved, of the fact that a
large element of the savings would come from re-setting the supplement
values.
Therefore the scheme has full BOM approval, and will not be changed.
There now, hasn't that improved your morale.
What do you mean, No. Didn't you get the free beer and the show biz stars
at your BOY kick off meetings and conferences?
What do you mean, you didn't have any BOY kick off meetings? How else did
you get your personal targets set so that you can achieve your requisite
performance and bonus payments?
Now, where's that tongue in cheek symbol, or maybe it should be the ...
(whoops, that one is obscene.)
Peter.
|
2100.446 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Pluck a Plump Plum | Wed Aug 18 1993 21:29 | 7 |
| re.445:
I don't understand Peter, of course it was done with BOM approval, and no doubt
they all took a cut in salary in-line with the UK subs performance and forgot
to tell us.
Dave.
|
2100.447 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Fri Aug 20 1993 13:17 | 6 |
2100.448 | fuel benefit = 0 | SHIPS::BROWN_C | | Fri Aug 20 1993 13:41 | 13 |
| I received an answer from car fleet in response to .373 about the
fuel allowance.
This response stated that they believe that my supposition was correct,
and the taxation currently imposed on such a benefit makes its net value
zero. This figure has been taken into account in the calculation of the
supplements, and will be included in HRO's annual market review to ensure
competitive supplements.
Let's hope this competitive practice is not seen as negative in years
to come!
- Chris -
|
2100.449 | Nope, still jumping! | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Fri Aug 20 1993 14:59 | 16 |
2100.450 | I'm one of the cloggers | SUBURB::MCDONALDA | Shockwave Rider | Fri Aug 20 1993 15:53 | 13 |
| Well, I'm pulling out, partly because of the new Company Car Tax, but
plenty because the new Digital Car Scheme sucks and the way the
transition has been handled.
I've got my purchase price for my leasemobile. Considering all the
horror stories of over inflated prices for leasemobiles I must admit to
being reasonably pleased by the offer price. It may be a couple of
hundred above what you *might* get at a dealer, BUT I know how its been
driven and its service history.
BTW Top marks to Louise Brierley.
Angus
|
2100.451 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Pluck a Plump Plum | Fri Aug 20 1993 16:13 | 10 |
| re.448:
Well done Chris on getting a response! I asked the question to my manager, it
was then passed to our functional personnel rep, who passed it to Employee
Services, who passed to Craig Johnson...
But, the answer you got does not make sense. I don't know of any current rate of
taxation that is 100%, so how could it be zero?
Dave.
|
2100.452 | fuel benefit tax is not a percentage | SHIPS::BROWN_C | | Fri Aug 20 1993 18:03 | 13 |
| Petrol is taxed as a benefit, and as such bears no real relation to
the amount you put in the tank or what he employer pays/refunds.
I cannot remember the current effective tax rate for fuel benefit, but
I remember thinking that you have to do quite a lot of private mileage
for it to be a real benefit. This is especially true for someone who
travels less than 2500 business miles.
Maybe someone can provide the actual figures.
- Chris -
|
2100.453 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Thu Aug 26 1993 15:53 | 6 |
| Re: 2120.21 & .22
Barrie, what are you doing submitting quotes ? You haven't had the R19
that long.
Royston
|
2100.454 | Why do we do this?. | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Fri Aug 27 1993 13:52 | 26 |
2100.455 | I'm leaving | ARRODS::WHITEHEAD | | Fri Aug 27 1993 15:30 | 18 |
| Well - I have conclusive proof that here in Digital, I have definitely
been under-over-compensated.
The day I found out about the Vauxhall scheme - I saw a job advert -
and I've jumped.
In a couple of weeks, I start at my new place... with a more than 50% hike
in basic salary (and then potential bonuses, pension etc) + fully expensed
non-Vauxhall car of my choice. Pretty well exactly the same job spec too.
My friend who is a recruitment consultant confirms that it isn't my new job
which pays too much - it's my old job which pays too little.
I guess that this doesn't go for all functions in Digital - but certainly,
technical consultants are just NOT paid the market rate - and by taking
our nice cars off us too - Digital is waving us goodbye.
Perhaps that's what the company wants.
|
2100.456 | Re -.1 | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Fri Aug 27 1993 16:38 | 10 |
| >>> - Digital is waving us goodbye.
>>>Perhaps that's what the company wants.
The don't have any severance (redundancy) cost that way.
Have you only just realised that?
Malcolm.
|
2100.457 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Wed Sep 01 1993 20:25 | 5 |
| RE 2120.28
Bernie, save yourself a packet and go for the Calibra 4x4 turbo :-)
Royston
|
2100.458 | Real Cost of Extras? | CHEFS::SWALLOWG | A bitter pill is hard to ..... | Mon Sep 06 1993 14:08 | 31 |
2100.459 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Sep 06 1993 18:35 | 5 |
| Has anyone leased a car other than a Vauxhall since the 'new' scheme?
All the quotes seem very over priced.
Greg
|
2100.460 | FY94 Car Costs - OFFICIAL | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Sep 21 1993 13:14 | 110 |
2100.461 | | ERMTRD::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Tue Sep 21 1993 15:35 | 5 |
|
I still think that we could have made greater savings by getting rid of our
self-imposed middlemen. Sub-contracting out Fleet to someone like Hertz/PHH
etc, or even someone like Vauxhall leasing, who do this as a business, and
getting rid of Digital Fleet who are just an overhead.
|
2100.462 | Watch this space... | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Tue Sep 21 1993 17:15 | 9 |
| Re. 461
The Vauxhall piece is only the first stage of the change process. We
are now into stage 2 where we are tendering leasing to companies and
looking for innovative and imaginative solutions for managing the
Fleet. However, sub-contracting does not necessarily produce a cost
saving of any magnitude, if at all.
Doug
|
2100.463 | Simple solution to even bigger cost savings | SAC::BARKER | Pretty Damn Cosmic | Tue Sep 21 1993 18:45 | 23 |
2100.464 | Think about everyone | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Sep 21 1993 19:03 | 2 |
| Yes Nigel, just because *you* wish to opt out doesn't mean the other
4000 employees do.
|
2100.465 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Pluck a Plump Plum | Tue Sep 21 1993 19:43 | 3 |
| Opting out is not as attractive if you do high company (or private!) mileage.
Dave.
|
2100.466 | ok then why ? | PATTRN::MITCHELLD | "Management is opaque" | Tue Sep 21 1993 21:24 | 5 |
2100.467 | Some facts | WOTVAX::SMITHCO | Live and Dangerous | Tue Sep 21 1993 21:36 | 8 |
2100.468 | some more facts | EBYGUM::WILLIAMSH | | Tue Sep 21 1993 23:21 | 12 |
2100.469 | Yet more facts | VANGA::KERRELL | Pluck a Plump Plum | Wed Sep 22 1993 12:42 | 4 |
2100.470 | Its even worse with Saabs... | PFENIG::DRAPER | | Wed Sep 22 1993 13:09 | 7 |
| The scheme is supposed to cover both Vauxhall and Saab cars, but the
position is even worse with Saabs. My Saab (ordered/delivered in May)
costs me 400 pounds a year; ordered under the new scheme, the same car
would cost me >2000 pounds/year.
Steve
|
2100.471 | | COMICS::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Wed Sep 22 1993 13:18 | 10 |
2100.472 | pull the other one, its got bells on | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Sep 22 1993 14:19 | 13 |
| .460 seems to imply that the cost savings come from the decrease in
cost provided by limiting choice and negotiating a "bulk purchase"
deal...
I don't see how anyone can dispute the fact that a significant
proportion of cost savings is as a direct increase in cost to the
employees in the scheme, and a reduction of cash benefit should they
leave it.
Xtine
|
2100.473 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Wed Sep 22 1993 14:40 | 19 |
| It is as simple as this.
They can now get a better deal on the 'standard car' so therefore the
amount has been reduced. This saves the company money.
I believe the standard car for level 8 is a Cavalier SRi 8v. If you
are level 8 and had one of these under the old scheme and had change in
your pocket then you were 'over compensated'.
If you were running a company and discovered that employees were being
overcompensated wouldn't you do something about it ? Especially if it
will save some jobs.
I am sorry but like Trev and Huw and other lower forms of life below
level 8, I see things differently.
Flame off, sorry folks its a bad day.
Royston
|
2100.474 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Wed Sep 22 1993 14:48 | 13 |
| Actually, I think that everything thing they've done to the car scheme is
fine. In fact, in their position I would probably have gone further and
removed all choice.
If the cash is an alternative to a car, in part or full, and the car value
has decreased, isn't it reasonable that the cash alternative should also ?
What I object to so strongly is the ridiculous amount of incorrect and
information and secrecy which seems to be such a deliberate part of it all.
Why not just be up-front about it all right from the start ? Tell me the
truth about the whole situation, I'm clever, I'll understand; Honest.
|
2100.475 | Let's start a new Topic for th '94 Car Scheme. | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Wed Sep 22 1993 16:06 | 10 |
|
For some reason, unknown to me (Mr Mod may know), my system (and the
same when I used my SUBURB ALL-IN-1 account) fails to record the notes that
I have read in this conference. So Next Unseen always goes to Note 2!
It takes now, three or four minutes to scroll down the directory for this
Topic! This will be Reply 475 (or later), please Mr Mod will you write lock it
and start a new Topic.
Malcolm.
|
2100.476 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Wed Sep 22 1993 16:20 | 7 |
| Is anyone else having a problem with this notes string ?
I'd rather not see it write locked.
Malcolm, maybe it is the interface you are using ?
Royston
|
2100.477 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Wed Sep 22 1993 16:21 | 8 |
| try the command "set seen/before=yesterday" and see if that sorts it.
Also, on a PC interface, and therefore I suspect others, you can set the
action to be taken on the open command.
Therefore try the command "mod profile /auto=unseen"
Failing that, try the conference TRUCKS::NOTES_HELP
|
2100.478 | | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Wed Sep 22 1993 17:16 | 6 |
| >>It takes now, three or four minutes to scroll down the directory for this
>>Topic! This will be Reply 475 (or later), please Mr Mod will you write lock it
Why not just type 2100.L? Or set a marker?
Ian.
|
2100.479 | Thanks for the suggestions. | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Wed Sep 22 1993 17:25 | 13 |
|
I have the "windows" access to notes on my VS3100/76 SPX and have now
done "Set Unseen - before 21-Sep-1993" and that has helped a little. Looks as
though I'll have to do this every day!!!!!!
Question is, why should I need to do this? It was the same when I
accessed this conference through my ALL-IN-1 account, but none of the other
conferences give me this problem via either route.
So, why do I have this trouble? There must be a reason or fault
somewhere that can be fixed properly - Mr Mod?
Malcolm.
|
2100.480 | It's the way it's presented | IOSG::DUTT | Nigel Dutt | Wed Sep 22 1993 17:27 | 22 |
| Re a few back....
At risk of winding up some of the recent <grade 8 noters, the view
looks slightly different from engineering. Here if you entered Digital
as a level 8/9 then what you were being offered was a "market
supplement" which could *optionally* be used totally or partially to
lease your choice of a car. The idea of the market supplement was to
ensure that the Digital compensation package matched the marketplace
where cars were typically supplied, but did it in the Digital way
(single status, employee choice, etc.).
So the end result now is a decrease in the benefit (over time) both
because of the drop in the cash equivalent and the restriction of
choice of car.
Most people understand that life is different now, times are tough and
the company has to save costs. One of the ways that the company can
save costs is by giving its employees less. The employee marketplace
has changed so that (presumably) the company believes it can cut back
on benefits without impacting its capacity to keep and (one day...) hire
employees. Now I think what angers people (me included) is when this is
presented in any other light.
|
2100.481 | here here | KERNEL::MORGANI | Just when you thought it was safe... | Wed Sep 22 1993 19:23 | 0 |
2100.482 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Sep 22 1993 19:47 | 15 |
2100.483 | What do you mean ??? | PLUNDR::LOWEG | WANTED!! A modern day Robin Hood. | Wed Sep 22 1993 20:29 | 8 |
|
>And even more annoying - it doesn't affect all employees equally...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What exactly do you mean by this ???
g.
|
2100.484 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Sep 22 1993 21:08 | 10 |
|
I access this conference and notes string from my SUBURB account with
absolutley no problems whatsoever.
it's not the conf
it's not SUBURB and ALL-IN-1
Heather
|
2100.485 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Wed Sep 22 1993 21:57 | 21 |
2100.486 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Thu Sep 23 1993 12:31 | 6 |
| I can't find the appropriate note, so I'll stick it here.
The service from Car Fleet at the moment is excellent. Very pleasant, very
efficient and very helpful.
M.
|
2100.487 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Sep 23 1993 14:02 | 20 |
| > Also, people who opted out of the scheme will not contribute towards
> the savings of running the car scheme (even though the cost of
> providing the car allowances is included in the cost of the scheme),
the people who opt out have been contributing to the savings in the
car scheme for the last 4 years, by being 400 quid "less
overcompensated"
Also, the company does not have to pay employers NI on the amount,
they don't need to have admin people to administer it etc...etc....
If the people who opt out, were to change their minds and opt in,
you would see an increase in the costs of the car scheme.
> In fact I can't find one consistent thing about the implementation...
It has never been consistent for the 9 years I've been here, it looks
like the trend is just continuing :-)
Heather
|
2100.488 | So what's new? | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Thu Sep 23 1993 16:24 | 16 |
2100.489 | | PLUNDR::LOWEG | WANTED!! A modern day Robin Hood. | Thu Sep 23 1993 16:49 | 7 |
|
Plus, all get the same car supplement allowance. Which reading between
the lines of previous notes would prove very unpopular.
g.
|
2100.490 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Pluck a Plump Plum | Thu Sep 23 1993 18:05 | 7 |
| re.488:
I don't understand your point, are you actually disputing the impact of the
recent car scheme changes on people who lease Vauxhalls other than the standard
car?
Dave.
|
2100.491 | | COMICS::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Thu Sep 23 1993 19:32 | 5 |
| Has anyone got anything NEW to say about the scheme? I get the feeling I
keep reading the same note over and over again.
Ian
|
2100.492 | | SBPUS4::Mark | | Thu Sep 23 1993 20:02 | 3 |
| Yes. I understand the reasoning and think it quite fair.
|
2100.493 | Please can I have a pay cut too? | MILE::JENKINS | Suitably refreshed | Thu Sep 23 1993 21:35 | 10 |
|
Yes. Save money on the scheme by reducing employee benefits. Seems fair
to me.
Richard.
Note : Anyone who didn't have a Vauxhall before and didn't want one
again is WORSE off. Even some of those who had Vauxhalls before the
changes and will want Vauxhalls again have suffered.
|
2100.494 | Me next for a pay cut | CHEFS::MARCHR | | Fri Sep 24 1993 13:28 | 7 |
| Yes that seems to be the gist of it.
Why is it being dressed up as a change to the car policy?
We're just being paid less - quite simple.
But why can't we be told that??
|
2100.495 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Fri Sep 24 1993 14:48 | 27 |
| No, no, no, no, no.
The 'market supplement' or 'car supplement' is worked out on a certain
model of car depending on your job level.
Under the new scheme the allowance has been reduced because the lease
cost is cheaper.
Under the old scheme the lease costs were very variable and the
allowance would cover that model and you would have change.
It really is as straight forward as that.
The bottom line is that level 8's and above are worse off
but its not been disguised as anything else.
Has anyone ever been told that the market supplement
was based on something else ?
It would be much fairer to have one car allowance and
if you have a higher job level your salary should
reflect this.
Does this make sense or is everyone ignoring
this because they are so upset ?
Royston
|
2100.496 | | ERMTRD::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Fri Sep 24 1993 16:38 | 6 |
|
> if you have a higher job level your salary should
> reflect this.
that one alone should be mandatory...
|
2100.497 | | SAC::BARKER | Pretty Damn Cosmic | Fri Sep 24 1993 17:47 | 19 |
| re .495
> The bottom line is that level 8's and above are worse off
> but its not been disguised as anything else.
The new car scheme offers less choice & higher prices in other words
there has been a reduction in the total benefits package for the whole
workforce. There has also been a de facto pay cut for many level 8+ employees.
This was certainly presented as a simple re-jigging of the scheme to enable
Digital to be more profitable.
Some of the full implications of the new scheme e.g. reductions in
total take home pay for some were not clear at first. They were even denied as
some BOM members categorically said that no-one would be worse off under the
new scheme. Eventually the truth dribbled out. Whether one subscribes to the
cock-up or the conspiracy theory there has definitely been a less than full &
frank disclosure of the effects of the new scheme in practise.
Nigel
|
2100.498 | NOT! | BAHTAT::FORCE6::hilton | Party on Dudes | Fri Sep 24 1993 18:32 | 6 |
| >> The new car scheme offers higher prices
Not if you compare the costs of the 'standard' level cars. The cost to the
employee of these cars has remained the same.
|
2100.499 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Fri Sep 24 1993 18:33 | 14 |
2100.500 | Get real | CHEFS::MARCHR | | Fri Sep 24 1993 19:54 | 3 |
| I think some of you must be on mind altering drugs if you think you are
not worse off.
|
2100.501 | Well I've opted out! See 2139.2 for details. | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Tue Sep 28 1993 11:52 | 20 |
| Re.498
>>> Not if you compare the costs of the 'standard' level cars. The cost to the
>>> employee of these cars has remained the same.
How may people (as a proportion of the total of those with a company car)
actually have a "standard" car? My guess that it isn't a very large proportion,
therefore most people will be affected by the changes!
Back a few notes, writers were saying about how the changes are not fair
and then there are those who say it is, but only if you have the standard car
etc. etc. etc. .... Well, what about those who are not elegible for a company
car or for any form of allowance for the job? They haven't had any sort of pay/
benefit/renumeration cut, but then most of them are lower paid anyway.
So pick the bones out of that then!
Malcolm.
|
2100.502 | | COMICS::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:03 | 10 |
| I fail to see the relevance. If you are not eligible for
a company car, then the changes do not affect you in any
way.
If you are concerned about not getting a pay rise, then
that's an entirely different debate, not suitable in this
conference.
Ian
|
2100.503 | Sandwich anyone? | SAC::BARKER | Pretty Damn Cosmic | Tue Sep 28 1993 19:51 | 14 |
| I good analogy here might be to look at the subsidised canteen that
Digital provides. Suppose that in the interests of economy that the hot food
service were axed & in future all that was available was sandwiches. Prices
generally were raised by 10% except those for the cheese & pickle sandwiches
which were reduced by 10%.
Now there's no denying that Digital is still providing a subsidised
lunch. Those people who always ate sandwiches would be reasonably happy. Those
who usually ate cheese & pickle sandwiches would be especially pleased.
The fact that some people are happy about the change doesn't mean that
there hasn't been an overall reduction in the total benefit package.
Nigel
|
2100.504 | | PATTRN::MITCHELLD | "Management is opaque" | Tue Sep 28 1993 20:53 | 12 |
| The Argument is ... for us 4 year level 8/9
We joined Digital and the Market supplement was MONEY!!! not car scheme
in the pay negociations prior to joining it was always described as MONEY not
car. You could with it as you wanted but you MUST have the car.
So at digitals convienence they later flim flam in it in as car supplement and
then reduce it.
Its the deception that really rankles, and the ongoing cover up.
I could call it something stronger, but I doubt I could get the police or a
civil court interested.
|
2100.505 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Thu Sep 30 1993 11:24 | 1 |
| Start a union!
|
2100.506 | DIGITAL is a NON-Union Company - it doesn't recognise or deal with any Union! | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Thu Sep 30 1993 11:39 | 0 |
2100.507 | Where have all the quotes gone ?? | SEDCAS::BRISTOW_A | | Thu Sep 30 1993 13:14 | 8 |
| Changing direction slightly....
Has car fleet caught up with all non Vauxhall quotes, as 2120.* seems
to have dried up a bit?
Or, are people not posting them anymore.?
Andy
|
2100.508 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Pluck a Plump Plum | Thu Sep 30 1993 14:36 | 9 |
| re.506:
I don't understand the relevance of Digital's current stance, if a significant
proportion of employees became members, their current position could be looked
back upon fondly as somewhat of an idealistic luxury. Anyway, I think you should
take this to UK_Digital, as this conference should be about cars and not
industrial relations at Digital..
Dave.
|
2100.509 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | No time for catching 'Zee's | Thu Sep 30 1993 16:56 | 8 |
2100.510 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Thu Nov 11 1993 14:57 | 30 |
2100.511 | Can't Leave | YUPPY::PATEMAN | I'm a Mean Green Mutha from Outa Space | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:13 | 5 |
| I don't know about who pays the difference, but you can only take over
a car when your old car is due for replacement or as a new hire. Also,
if you leave the scheme, you cannot rejoin.
Paul
|
2100.512 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:21 | 8 |
| re .511
Officially this is true but I know of several cases where for personal
reasons people have given their car up in mid lease for take over
and that is the point I was making. Also there are local arrangements
where you can leave the scheme and rejoin.
Royston
|
2100.513 | | VANGA::KERRELL | The first word in DECUS is Digital | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:24 | 10 |
2100.514 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:36 | 8 |
|
If you go off pregnant, unless you want to keep paying the full cost,
you have to give the car back.
When you come back, you can have a new car, or take up any on the
list - even your original - at a reduced takeover price.
Heather
|
2100.515 | | COMICS::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:31 | 17 |
2100.516 | | VANGA::KERRELL | The first word in DECUS is Digital | Thu Nov 11 1993 17:08 | 6 |
| re.515:
Fair comment, I was looking for a family car, and dead cheap thus the cars
quoted.
Dave.
|
2100.517 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Nov 15 1993 17:18 | 20 |
| Has anyone else had problems with cars available for takeover ?
A guy I work with is having a long wait for his new car and as he is
new to the scheme he has been having a string of takeover cars to run
around in rather than a hire car.
Because he is not taking them over officially, he cannot have them
valleted and has had all sorts of problems with flat batteries empty
fuel tanks vsl alarms with flat batteries in the remote key. Not to
mention the cr*p that people leave in them.
Car fleet don't seem to know or care about the state of the cars. They
just try and keep track of where they are and let the person taking
over the car to sort out all the problems (sometimes even the road tax
has run out).
I don't know what should be done about this, I just feel sorry for the
hassle involved.
Royston
|
2100.518 | First impressions count! | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Tue Nov 16 1993 14:22 | 5 |
|
What an impression to give a new employee or driver the poor guy must
be thinking what the hell have I gotten myself into here?
Richard
|
2100.519 | | COMICS::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Tue Nov 16 1993 15:04 | 12 |
| Trying to put this positively...
If I'd have known how little car fleet pay for a valet, I would have
requested the money and got it done by a professional valet company.
After the first (of 3) visits to get it valeted, they didn't even empty
the ashtrays, and I quote, "he probably didn't recognise that they were
ashtrays" 8-} Car fleet pay half the amount charged by reputable car
valet companies (in the South).
There, that wasn't too depressing was it.
tp
|
2100.520 | hmmm, won't affect me | PLUNDR::MORAN | Deemed expendible! | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:47 | 13 |
|
Newsflash from VTX:
**************************** NEWSFLASH ******************************
DETAILS OF THE DIGITAL FY94 CAR SCHEME ARE NOW BEING CIRCULATED TO ALL
EMPLOYEES. THE PREFERRED CAR LIST AND PRICES WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE UNTIL
MID-JULY.
NO NEW QUOTES OR ORDERS WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL 1ST AUGUST ONWARDS. THOSE
QUOTES AND ORDERS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED WILL BE HONOURED AND
WILL BE BASED ON THE DIGITAL FY93 CAR SCHEME DRIVER PRICES AND SUPPLEMENTS..
**************************** NEWSFLASH ******************************
|
2100.521 | Won't affect anybody | WOTVAX::GILLILANDP | Not very Tuna-friendly | Mon Dec 13 1993 17:28 | 3 |
| Errrrm, that is a VERY old newsflash.
Phil Gill.
|
2100.522 | Just in case we were in any doubt, eh Phil? | COMICS::SHELLEY | | Mon Dec 13 1993 17:51 | 3 |
| Errrrm, I think that is his point Phil.
Royston
|
2100.523 | In which case, why didn't he put a smiley? | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Tue Dec 14 1993 16:04 | 0 |
2100.524 | Cavalier Air Bag lease cost? | REOSV0::ROEM | | Fri Jan 28 1994 12:29 | 8 |
|
Does anyone know the extra lease cost for a Passenger side Air Bag
on a Cavalier?
Thanks,
Mike
|
2100.525 | | WOTVAX::FIDDLERM | The sense of being dulls my mind | Fri Jan 28 1994 13:28 | 6 |
| re-1
#81 per year for a Cavalier GLS. The full 'real' cost is #295, for tax
purposes.
Mikef
|
2100.526 | Rovers or Vauxhalls | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Feb 02 1994 21:57 | 8 |
| A chap in our office was told by fleet that Rover's will be added to
the PCL.
Any one else heard this?
cheers,
Greg
|
2100.527 | | LARVAE::DARRALL_D | Durelli, Gripping Stuff !!! | Wed Feb 02 1994 23:19 | 6 |
| We have got some big system going with Rover recently though haven't
we?
All there Dealerships or something like that will have access.
Dave D
|
2100.528 | Additions to the car list.. | ROCKS::CAMP | | Thu Feb 03 1994 16:10 | 2 |
| BMWs will be on the scheme next!
|
2100.529 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Thu Feb 03 1994 16:20 | 1 |
| BMWs are on the scheme - they're just a trifle expensive!
|
2100.530 | Gobsmacked of LEEDS | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Feb 09 1994 20:48 | 3 |
| Renault 19 16v for 4,500!!!
Speechless
|
2100.531 | Experiences of taking a non-Vauxhall car on the scheme please | LARVAE::HANCOCK_M | | Fri Mar 11 1994 15:56 | 7 |
|
Hi ,
does anyone have any experiences/and/or prices related to
taking a non Vauxhall (or Saab) car on the scheme,and what
premium we pay by doing so ?
Cheers Mick
|
2100.532 | | VANGA::KERRELL | The first word in DECUS is Digital | Fri Mar 11 1994 16:06 | 3 |
| See 2120 and 2100 in here.
Dave.
|
2100.533 | | WOTVAX::COUPLANDS | Simon Coupland | Thu Mar 24 1994 00:27 | 9 |
| Silly question, I know - but...
has anybody asked Car Fleet to enter the quotes into this conf directly.
Just like the old VTX service I guess. It would save a lot of time and
money, I for one have been chasing car quotes for a couple of months.
cheers
simon
|
2100.534 | Car Scheme Shelved? | WELCLU::DAWS | | Fri Mar 25 1994 20:16 | 14 |
|
Just heard on the grapevine that the Vauxhall scheme has been
shelved because Digital did not meet its volume discount numbers
due to employees opting for non Vauxhall cars.
If this is so can we expect the non Vauxhall prices to come
down to a more reasonable level again?
Any comments, laughter or tears?
Mark.
|
2100.535 | Speculation | COMICS::SHELLEY | Bugs B Gone | Fri Mar 25 1994 20:41 | 18 |
| Its a bit dangerous to spread this around as it appears to be only a
rumour.
However, with a lot of people leaving the company and others that are
opting out of the scheme altogether, it doesn't surprise me that the
number of cars is less than expected.
I guess things will be made clear in June/July for the begininning of
next FY.
Just before Doug Arnold left he said to me 'watch out for some more
changes to the car scheme'. I wonder if this is what he mean't.
It would surprise me in the current climate if we went back to the way
things were. If changes are made again I suspect it will be in the
companies favour rather than the employees'.
Royston
|
2100.536 | No car and no cash?? | CHEFS::MARCHR | | Fri Mar 25 1994 20:49 | 6 |
| Ref -1
Difficult to see how much more it could be "in the company's favour",
but I suppose it's possible...
|
2100.537 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Mon Mar 28 1994 15:23 | 8 |
| I doubt whether prices will ever be what they were. Old
scheme prices were based on a larger supplement. Maybe
we can do a deal with a few manufacturers and limit choice
to a shortlist of manufacturers and models.
Ian
|
2100.538 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Bugs B Gone | Mon Mar 28 1994 16:29 | 11 |
2100.539 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Mon Mar 28 1994 17:25 | 5 |
| >but this would clearly be an errosion of benifit!
... and this would be unheard of in a company such as
Digital!
|
2100.540 | Erosion of benefits... | SLPSTK::ILES | Mike Iles - Business Partner Development Assistance | Tue Mar 29 1994 13:40 | 8 |
2100.541 | I think that is what he mean't in .539. | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:20 | 0 |
2100.542 | For "!", read ":-)" | COMICS::SHELLEY | Bugs B Gone | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:25 | 1 |
|
|
2100.543 | So we are in violent agreement... | SLPSTK::ILES | Mike Iles - Business Partner Development Assistance | Tue Mar 29 1994 17:08 | 3 |
| MAkes much more sense with a smiley.....
-Mike-
|
2100.545 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Tue Mar 29 1994 19:51 | 4 |
| I hate those smileys. Anyway, I didn't really expect anyone to
take a comment like that seriously.
Ian
|
2100.546 | | BAHTAT::62664::dodd | | Thu Apr 07 1994 18:15 | 9 |
| I have received a mail from my manager, the provenance is not clear so I
can't post it, which suggests minor tweaks to the car scheme for a couple of
months. Take over of used cars, the discount drops to 5% for FY94 Vauxhalls,
15% for non-Vauxhalls and 25% for pre-FY94 Vauxhalls. It also appears that
some new orders will be deferred to May 5th.
Presumably this is to try and encourage us to take cars over.
Andrew
|
2100.547 | this sounds interesting | IOSG::JONESK | Wales for the World Cup 1995 | Fri Apr 08 1994 13:50 | 1 |
| Can anyone shed more light on this???
|
2100.548 | Cars already discounted | MUGGER::LIVINGSTONE | Survive! get a little crazy... | Fri Apr 08 1994 17:25 | 20 |
| The memo referred to is from Betsy Fitter who requests that the message
be cascaded to management teams. So most managers must know, mine
certainly did!
I contacted Car Fleet and they advised that they ALREADY apply the
discount to the takeover cars shown on VTX.
Extract from memo:
Cars placed on the take-over list will attract the following discounts:
Vauxhall cars (pre FY94), 25%
Vauxhall cars (FY94), 5%
Non Vauxhall cars 15%
There is also other information regarding people awaiting delivery of
new cars, cars from redundant employees and leaving the car scheme.
I would advise interested parties to check via their manager or try car
fleet for further details.
Phil.
|
2100.549 | | COMICS::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Fri Apr 08 1994 18:19 | 7 |
| To me this is bad news. As I remember, the discount was something like
30%. It was never as low as 15%. That's why I'm driving a takeover
car that was 800 cheaper than a new one and 400 cheaper than my
previous lease (for the equivalent car).
Sounds like they are reducing the benefit again !
tp
|
2100.550 | What's it say about leaving the scheme? | BRUMMY::WALLACE_J | | Fri Apr 08 1994 21:02 | 14 |
| What does it say about leaving the car scheme?
To me it is looking an attractive option even at this years prices.
Next years Vauxhall prices *will* be worse (work it out: this year's
Vauxhall prices must have been based on projected quantities which will
never now be achieved due to (a) people being made redundant (b) people
leaving voluntarily (c) people opting out and (d) takeovers from these
rather than new buys . Quantity goes down, prices go up.).
I'd ask my manager about the Betsy Fitter mail but I'm not sure I've
got one at the moment.
regards
john
|
2100.551 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Bugs B Gone | Fri Apr 08 1994 21:26 | 12 |
2100.552 | re: last | MILE::JENKINS | Norfolk enchance | Fri Apr 08 1994 22:05 | 6 |
|
....dream on....
This has all the makings of the dreaded double whammy!
First, we lop loads off your allowances, then we put the prices up.
|
2100.553 | | BAHTAT::62664::dodd | | Mon Apr 11 1994 12:13 | 9 |
| It's the thought process that baffles me.
n hundred cars are due to be returned in the next week or two, so lets reduce
the takeover discount from 30% to 5%.
Make that person a salesman, or put them in charge of morale. They obviously
have a deep understanding of how to make people do what is required.
Andrew
|
2100.554 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Bugs B Gone | Wed Apr 20 1994 14:19 | 4 |
| Has anyone put a quote in yet (or know of anyone who has) for a 16v
Probe ?
Royston
|
2100.555 | Car Fleet Going???? | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Thu Apr 21 1994 15:51 | 6 |
| Just heard from a reliable source that Car fleet is to be outsourced
as of June. Anybody else heard anything????
Regards Martin
|
2100.556 | Yup. It will probably operate out of Windsor, too. | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Thu Apr 21 1994 16:18 | 0 |
2100.557 | | WOTVAX::HATTOS | I think, Therefore I'm paid less | Thu Apr 21 1994 17:12 | 3 |
| Who is based in Windsor?
Hertz?
|
2100.558 | WAIT FOR IT?. | YUPPY::MIDGLEYC | | Tue Apr 26 1994 17:57 | 9 |
| Hello out there?,
not being one to start rumours?, I have heard
that the fuel allowance of 8p per mile, is going to be reduced
for those with diesels??.
Can anyone out there throw any light on this????????
Regards
Colin.
|
2100.559 | Difficult! | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Wed Apr 27 1994 15:14 | 6 |
|
That would be difficult, since the same rate is given to those who have
come out of the Car Scheme and "they" have no way of officially knowing what
sort of car you are running.
Malcolm.
|
2100.560 | | PAPERS::CORNE | John Corne | Wed Apr 27 1994 16:51 | 5 |
| Since when did "they" let such practical things get in the way. It
would be just another chance to improve my moral.
Jc
|
2100.561 | Don't put it passed them | NEWOA::CROME_A | | Wed Apr 27 1994 18:37 | 5 |
| If they can give a different rate according to the size of the engine on a
motorcycle they can do anything. Not sure where the cut off points are, I just
remember there was one around the 550 size.
Andy
|
2100.562 | ? | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Fri Jun 17 1994 18:25 | 9 |
2100.563 | Cheaper? (re: 2120.83) | YUPPY::PATEMAN | Some Fantastic Place | Mon Jun 20 1994 19:46 | 7 |
| Re -1
Are you sure? My 318iS (Metallic, FFog, Elec SRf, Heated locks, Alarm &
radio) is #4619 under the "old" scheme. The 316 Coupe wasn't available
then.
Paul
|
2100.564 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Mon Jun 20 1994 20:10 | 5 |
| Can we have the explanation about the use of Leaseplan
please?
ian
|
2100.565 | Explanation of 2120.83 | FILTON::SEARLE_A | | Mon Jun 20 1994 21:52 | 13 |
|
The reason I said it looked ceaper was that for my Current 316i
saloon with sunroof and front fog's I can now get a 316i SE, i.e.
alloy wheel's and electric motor (for the sunroof). As for the cost
of the 318is I can't comment as I don't know the price off the pre.
Vauxhall PCL.
|
2100.566 | New lease co. | UBOHUB::KING_I | | Tue Jun 21 1994 15:08 | 5 |
| Fleet advised me the other day we are no longer using Hertz, but
Leaseplan, which may explain why Hertz refused to authorise new wiper
blades for my car last week!
Don't know if it's only Leaseplan, full stop.
|
2100.567 | Could be good news | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Tue Jun 21 1994 15:27 | 5 |
| This is interesting. I wonder if this means the Vauxhall/Hertz deals
have gone to the wall and we will start getting favourable quotes with
all manufacturers again.
Royston
|
2100.568 | Anythings better than a GM shack.! | YUPPY::BRISTOWA | | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:46 | 10 |
| Re - 1.
You're joking.!
Favourable quotes, does anybody remember those.??
The only favourable thing about Non-Vauxhall quotes, is that they are
"Non Vauxhall"..
Andy
|
2100.569 | Vauxhall Trooper | FAILTE::BRUCEA | | Thu Jun 23 1994 20:22 | 7 |
|
Has anyone seen quotes for the Izusu Trooper in Vauxhall badges yet??
It is a lot more robust than the Fontera but will probaly be a lot
dearer.
Adrian
|
2100.570 | Vauxhall Trooper | BAHTAT::TOWNSEND_D | What me ?.......Never | Thu Jun 23 1994 21:38 | 6 |
|
The price of the 3.1TD is about 4k more than the Frontera...so Vauxhall
told me.I have spoken to Car Fleet this week, they are working out the
prices and are hoping to put them on VTX this week if possible.
BTW The name is the Vauxhall Monterey (sp?)
|
2100.571 | Monterey Prices ? | YUPPY::BRISTOWA | | Mon Jul 11 1994 13:49 | 9 |
| re.-1
So where are the Monterey quotes then ?
This week.! Is that this week this year, or next ?
Awaiting.....
/ab
|
2100.572 | How expensive are alloy wheels? | BRUMMY::WALLACE_J | | Mon Jul 11 1994 16:20 | 9 |
2100.573 | Any idea ? | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Thu Jul 28 1994 14:02 | 8 |
| A colleague has resigned from Digital and is trying to find out if
he can buy his lease car (which is in mid lease).
I understand you can buy your lease car if you get the package but I
don't know what the situation is if you leave of your own accord (No,
its not a Honda :-) ).
Royston
|
2100.574 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Thu Jul 28 1994 14:45 | 6 |
| re .-1
We've found out that as car fleet don't want any more cars lying around
that he can buy the car.
Royston
|
2100.575 | FY95 Car Scheme | FAILTE::THOMSONS | Stuart Thomson | Thu Jul 28 1994 17:54 | 10 |
|
The FY95 Car Scheme is due to be published on VTX 1st August , anyone any ideas
of what changes are in store . Is there a move away from GM cars is there a move
to Ford,Rover or is it back to quotes that will all be very expensive.
Will the base car be a Lada Samara or a Skoda Favorit ??????????
Stuart
|
2100.576 | What do you think ? | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Thu Jul 28 1994 19:03 | 6 |
| A question to all noters....
Is it a good idea to create a new FY95 car scheme note or rename this
topic as a generic "car scheme" note for continued discussion ?
Royston
|
2100.577 | Purge it? | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Thu Jul 28 1994 19:09 | 5 |
|
Royston, do we still need the FY94 Note probably not could we not rename
it and purge it? thus recovering some disk space.
Richard
|
2100.578 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Thu Jul 28 1994 19:13 | 1 |
| yeh, clean this topic out after 'THE' announcement
|
2100.579 | | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, Central PSC, Birmingham UK | Thu Jul 28 1994 19:14 | 5 |
| Please keep the FY94 note, and create a new FY95 one.
It is always useful to look back on how things were done!!!
mb
|
2100.580 | The host's view | TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Thu Jul 28 1994 19:55 | 8 |
| For what it's worth, Roy has suggested and I endorse this note staying,
and a new FY954 note being created, starting with the announcement as
soon as someone receives it.
I am not desperate for the disk space so I'll not be reclaiming the
space just yet!
Richard
|
2100.581 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Thu Jul 28 1994 19:58 | 4 |
| Look again. VTX says the FY95 Preferred Car List will be published 1st
August. WHere does it mention any change in the car scheme? I can
understand a new list - one that includes Frontera convertible,
Monterey's, takes new prices/models into account.
|
2100.582 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Thu Jul 28 1994 20:04 | 5 |
| But I heard a while ago that the favourable vauxhall quotes were going
out the window because we weren't ordering enough cars. There may be
some surprises.
Royston
|
2100.583 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Thu Jul 28 1994 20:09 | 6 |
| According to this conference, I don't believe anyone else heard any
such rumours - where did you hear it from? I hope the scheme is made
a bit more open again like it used to be, but last year there was
a lot of publicity around the new scheme - this year it has been very
quiet.
|
2100.584 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Thu Jul 28 1994 20:43 | 13 |
2100.585 | Just a thought .. | COMICS::FLANDERSD | I remember the look in your eye | Fri Jul 29 1994 01:00 | 5 |
|
but being a suspicious sort of person, a copy of the prices from the
current scheme would probably be worth keeping !
Dave
|
2100.586 | Prices from FY94 Car Scheme for posterity. | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Fri Jul 29 1994 13:01 | 360 |
2100.587 | Late again!! | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Aug 01 1994 14:38 | 1 |
| Well it's the 1st, and the list's the same.........
|
2100.588 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Mon Aug 01 1994 14:45 | 1 |
| It isn't even 11am yet. Give them a chance.
|
2100.589 | not yet | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Mon Aug 01 1994 19:44 | 5 |
| its 15:35 and fleet are still sorting through the prices....
Martin
|
2100.590 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Mon Aug 01 1994 21:46 | 1 |
| It's there! Now there are ONLY Vauxhalls. No Saabs
|
2100.591 | They are there!!!!!! | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, Central PSC, Birmingham UK | Mon Aug 01 1994 21:46 | 0 |
2100.592 | More expensive? | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, Central PSC, Birmingham UK | Mon Aug 01 1994 21:57 | 12 |
2100.593 | | WAYOUT::LOAT | Stop throwing those bloody spears! | Tue Aug 02 1994 12:19 | 11 |
|
Does anyone know why there are so many models which are being deleted
by Vauxhall?
There are 24 of these models out of a total of 45 which are being
deleted in the Astra range. Are Vauxhall revamping the Astra range
completely? If so, anyone know when the new range of Astras will be
available?
Steve.
|
2100.594 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Hakuna matata! | Tue Aug 02 1994 12:26 | 3 |
| I quick flick through the prices left me wondering what the base cars are now.
Dave.
|
2100.595 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Life's a big banana sandwich | Tue Aug 02 1994 12:46 | 2 |
| I also notice the "standard" Cavalier 1.6 LS is less
than the supplement now.
|
2100.596 | Up or down???? | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Aug 02 1994 12:54 | 9 |
| >> ANY ORDERS PLACED AFTER 1ST JULY WHERE THE DRIVER PRICE IS NOW
>> SUBSEQUENTLY LOWER WILL BE AMENDED TO FY95 PRICE.
This from VTX seems to suggest prices have gone down, whereas Martin
reckons they've gone up 21%!
Greg
|
2100.597 | Well the Frontera Sport (at least) has gone up loads!!! | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, Central PSC, Birmingham UK | Tue Aug 02 1994 13:01 | 0 |
2100.598 | | WOTVAX::HATTOS | That tree looked at me | Tue Aug 02 1994 13:04 | 8 |
| Time for an FY95 note?
On the whole I thin most prices have gone up. The Frontera price sticks
out like a sore thumb.
Are these prices from Leaseplan? I will keep an eye on the non-Vauxhall
quotes with interest.
|
2100.599 | for reference | ERMTRD::CLIFFE | I'll warp my own space-time ... | Tue Aug 02 1994 13:07 | 6 |
|
Order Ref Model Annual Driver Price
94scheme 128 GLS 1.7TD 5DR H/B 2728
95scheme 1118 GLS 1.7TD 5DR H/B 2818 +98 pounds
|
2100.600 | | BAHTAT::DODD | | Tue Aug 02 1994 13:54 | 5 |
| The Omega prices are down by 100 to 350 pounds.
There was a nice Frontera Nautilus outside Carnell this morning!?
Andrew
|
2100.601 | Our deal is good | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Aug 05 1994 13:13 | 10 |
| FWIW.
Well it looks like our 'good deal' with Vauxhall actually works. A
non-DECcie friend just spent weeks dealing with local suppliers to
lease a Calibra V6 with leather seats. The best deal he got was 5220 a
year, whereas our scheme is 4823.
Cheers,
Greg
|
2100.602 | Lease Plan? | MUGGER::WILLIAMSH | Huw Williams, Solutions Support Group, 851 2686 | Thu Dec 22 1994 18:39 | 9 |
| Anyone know who 'Lease Plan' are?
I've just got my new tax disc through the internal mail, and it is stapled
to a with compliments slip from Lease Plan. They seem to be based in
Windsor. But I've got a PHH car!
Should I start a rumor that Car Fleet has been outsourced?
Huw.
|
2100.603 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Thu Dec 22 1994 18:43 | 6 |
| As far as I know Digital no longer gets cars from Hertz or
PHH. All new cars come from Lease Plan.
Sounds to me like your lease has been transferred to Lease Plan.
Royston
|
2100.604 | | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, Central PSC, Birmingham UK | Thu Dec 22 1994 18:53 | 10 |
| > Should I start a rumor that Car Fleet has been outsourced?
I thought that they already had!
LeasePlan do all the admin etc, but i am not sure whether they
actually provide the cars, or get them from PHH/Hertz/Cheep-o-Motors!
This happened months ago.
mb
|
2100.605 | Nobody told me | BLKPUD::WILLIAMSH | Flat tank Sunbeam rider | Fri Dec 23 1994 14:23 | 6 |
| >>Sounds to me like your lease has been transferred to Lease Plan
I don't think so Roy, since the Post Office stamp on the tax disc says
Swindon, where PHH are based.
Huw.
|
2100.606 | | VANGA::KERRELL | DECUS UK - IT User Group of the Year '94 | Fri Dec 23 1994 17:06 | 5 |
| re.last few
I've not had any information about changes to the lease scheme.
Dave.
|
2100.607 | | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Wed May 03 1995 20:46 | 3 |
| Anyone know what has happened to the Fleet Admin VTX page?
Ian.
|
2100.608 | | QUICHE::PITT | "Where there are no people, the vision perishes..." | Wed May 03 1995 20:52 | 4 |
| It's still there for me. Connect to LARVAE object 143, and you'll get it as
item 2 on the menu - I thought this was UK standard VTX home page ...
T
|
2100.609 | | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Thu May 04 1995 12:51 | 8
|