[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hbahba::cam_sports

Title:Sports 93-96 Archive. No new notes allowed
Notice:Chainsaw's last standSPORTS_97
Moderator:HBAHBA::HAAS
Created:Mon Jan 11 1993
Last Modified:Tue Apr 15 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:302
Total number of notes:117855

56.0. "The Unofficial New England Patriots Note" by AXIS::ROBICHAUD (Another NEW Boston Garden gone) Tue Jan 12 1993 15:48

    			Somebody had to do it...
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
56.2As The Pigskin TurnsAXIS::ROBICHAUDAnother NEW Boston Garden goneTue Jan 12 1993 15:5819
	1.  Will somebody buy this team?

	2.  Will somebody coach this team?

	3.  Will somebody manage this team?

	4.  Will anybody want to play for this team?

	5.  Will somebody build a new stadium?

	6.  Will Billy Bulger let them?

	7.  Will Mr Orthwein move this team to St. Louis?

	8.  Will anybody care if he does?

	9.  Will anybody notice if he does?

	10. Will this team win another game?
56.3Pats not for sale ... yetPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 12 1993 16:0650
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc,clari.sports.top

Subject: Patriots not for sale ... yet
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 17:38:21 EST

	FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- The New England Patriots, coming off a 2-14
season, said Monday they have begun looking for a coach and general
manager, the first steps in an overhaul of the team.
	Mike O'Hallaron, the club's vice chairman, said only once those
positions are filled and the direction of the team set will club owner
James Orthwein address plans to sell the franchise.
	``When Mr. Orthwein feels comfortable, the Patriots will be for sale,
'' O'Hallaron said at a news conference. ``However, at the present time
no offers are being entertained.''
	Orthwein is likely to get the first bid from Fran Murray, a former
owner of 49 percent of the team. Orthwein expects several bids and the
selling price could be about $110 million, although he would not confirm
that figure.
	More immediately, Orthwein will interview coaching and general
manager candidates in St. Louis, where he lives. It is not yet clear if
the two positions will be incorporated into one.
	Dick MacPherson was fired as coach of the Patriots last Friday, and
General Manager Sam Janovich resigned the next day.
	``We will have the right person or persons in place as quickly as
possible, hopefully within the next 10 days,'' O'Hallaron said.
	O'Hallaron said Orthwein began receiving offers from local groups as
early as last May, when Orthwein purchased majority interest of the team
from Victor Kiam.
	At the time, Orthwein said he would not be the owner ``indefinitely,''
nor would he move the team to another city. Orthwein will serve as
chairman and chief executive officer for a St. Louis franchise if the
NFL awards a team to the city.
	``Mr. Orthwein has no intentions of moving the franchise out of New
England,'' O'Hallaron said. ``Jim's goal is to build a winning football
team. I don't know how much longer he'll own the team. But you can be
sure that as long as he does, he feels an obligation to make it as good
as he possibly can. We believe that an NFL franchise must have local
identity to succeed.''
	Orthwein is said to have paid $86 million for the team and assumed
another $20 million in obligations. The team reportedly lost $4 million
this past season.
	Whoever owns the Patriots must assume a lease with the owners of
Foxboro Stadium that runs through 2006. O'Hallaron said Orthwein hopes a
football stadium/convention center can be built.
	``It would not only benefit the Patriots but be helpful in attracting
revenues from conventions and their associated business,'' O'Hallaron
said.
	The Patriots, who shared the league's worst record with the Seattle
Seahawks, have the first pick in the April draft.
56.4OURGNG::RIGGENWill Note for foodTue Jan 12 1993 16:3528
	1.  Will somebody buy this team?
             (yes)

	2.  Will somebody coach this team?
             (yes)

	3.  Will somebody manage this team?
             (no that is the coach's job)

	4.  Will anybody want to play for this team?
             (no but the draft still exists)

	5.  Will somebody build a new stadium?
             (aren't the braves building a new stadium ?)

	6.  Will Billy Bulger let them?
             (only if Joe Walton picks em' will buger let em')

	7.  Will Mr Orthwein move this team to St. Louis?
             (Orthwein Pigstein who cares)

	8.  Will anybody care if he does?
             (see above)

	9.  Will anybody notice if he does?
             
	10. Will this team win another game?
             (only if Dan reeves is at the helm)
56.5CUPMK::DEVLINJunk Note Free ZoneTue Jan 12 1993 16:446
Boy with Lou Gorman's Plan in place for the 1993 Red Sox, the Celts
treading water, the Broons preparing for their annual imitation of
the Rangers, and the utter chaos of the Pats, it sure is a good
year to be a Boston fan, eh?

JD
56.7they're both foolsFRETZ::HEISERarms raised in a VTue Jan 12 1993 18:411
    If the Cards don't hire Ditka, this team better.
56.8ROYALT::ASHEIt's big, heavy, it's wood...Tue Jan 12 1993 21:2825
	1.  Will somebody buy this team?
          I'll sell my DEC stock for it...
	2.  Will somebody coach this team?
          Sure, you want to... nah. we'll get Ninj to manage it.
	3.  Will somebody manage this team?
          I did ok with fantasy football, why is this different?
	4.  Will anybody want to play for this team?
          Nah, I'll get Doc to be QB, everyone else will quit (haha)
	5.  Will somebody build a new stadium?
          No, stay down there, just put in seats, to replace the benches.
	6.  Will Billy Bulger let them?
          See 5)
	7.  Will Mr Orthwein move this team to St. Louis?
          Can you say Bud-Weiser?
	8.  Will anybody care if he does?
          You will, that means Lisa goes with them...
	9.  Will anybody notice if he does?
          See 8)
	10. Will this team win another game?
           Who cares...
    
    Who's left there?  Is Lisa Coles the highest ranking position there?
    Let her be GM.  Get some new uniforms, let the cheerleaders be the
    coaches.  
    
56.9DEMING::MCKAYWed Jan 13 1993 14:553
    Walt #5 is a classic, I almost spit out my lunch.  Send it to the Doc!
    
    Jimbo
56.10ROYALT::ASHEIt's big, heavy, it's wood...Wed Jan 13 1993 21:361
    Yeah, but am I wrong?
56.11PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 20 1993 12:411
    Rumor has it that the Pats have an offer on the table to Bill Parcells.
56.12CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Jan 20 1993 12:433
>    Rumor has it that the Pats have an offer on the table to Bill Parcells.

If so, then Orthwein seems to have more gray matter than George Young....
56.15color me perplexedCTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyWed Jan 20 1993 13:1718
    Lemme ask a real dumb question.
    
    Why the hail would Orthwein offer the job to Parcells when da franchise
    is in disarray, needs to be stabilized and THEN sold to a local buyer.
    I woulda thunk that Orthwein woulda hired a_interim type coach for less
    bucks(Say a Ryan), stabilize da team, sell it to Fireman,
    THEN take off to San Loooie wif an expansion team and THEN offer
    Parcells THAT job??
    
    Either that or he offers Parcells the Pats job, and eventually moves
    the franchise to San Looie and THEN NE gits an expansion team!!
    
    Am I that far off?
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
56.13FDCV06::KINGThe Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!Wed Jan 20 1993 13:303
    Parcells has priced him self out and Buddy Ryan is in..
    
    REK
56.14-1, conjecture or validated proof?CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyWed Jan 20 1993 13:321
    
56.16GOMETS::mccarthyMike McCarthy MRO4-3/C19 297-4531Wed Jan 20 1993 13:479
If Orthwein can land Parcells, it may allow him to get more when/if
he sells the team.  Ryan and Ditka may have a similar effect, but I
can't see any prospective buyer not wanting Parcells.  

I think Orthwein is going to hold on to the team until he gets an
expansion club.  If he doesn't get one, blackouts won't be a problem
around here anymore.

Mike
56.17Get Parcells!NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 20 1993 14:1825
    
    The Pats have to hire a coach, and soon, or they'll be in a lot of
    trouble for next year and perhaps longer, and no prospective owner is
    going to like that.  Given that, I think that Bill Parcells is as
    good as anyone to have in place when the franchise is sold.  What's the
    price of a coach such as Parcells, anyway?  Per year, what they paid to 
    Hugh Millen last year?  At absolute worst, Orthwein may have to
    subsidize the salary in order to sell the team.  Big deal, maybe
    another couple million out of $100M+.  The guy wants out, and he wants
    his expansion franchise.  Other than that, what right-minded intelligent 
    owner is going to object to Parcells (don't say anything, Giants' fans!)?
    I think this issue has been completely overrated by the local media,
    which loved Dick MacPherson, in spite of his obvious and glaring 
    shortcomings (including his health, and, yes, age).  The question is
    simple: do the Patriots ever want to get serious and win, or do they
    want to be "entertaining", as in the circus?
    
    Buddy Ryan is another story.  He'd be a good candidate to get fired the
    minute the ink is dry.  If Buddy Ryan is named the head coach of the
    Pats, I predict that it will only turn out to be the latest fiasco in a
    long history of fiascos for the New England Patriots.  Going from
    Parcells to Ryan is penthouse to the outhouse, imo.
    
    glenn                                        
    
56.18PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 20 1993 14:301
    Didn't Parcells leave the Giants partly due to health reasons?
56.19CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Jan 20 1993 14:499
>    Didn't Parcells leave the Giants partly due to health reasons?


That's been my contention for a while.  But he's had his ticker fixed, and
changed his lifestyle a bit.  (I thought I'd heard that he had quit
smoking, but I might be wrong).....


'Saw
56.20METSNY::francusGeorge and Dan are GONE!Wed Jan 20 1993 15:207
Parcells left the Giants as much because of burnout as anything else.

Apparently the issue with Parcells and NE is Parcells wants language in
his contract protecting him if the team is sold.

The Crazy Met
56.21Unconfirmed Report - Parcells is INCUPMK::DEVLINJunk Note Free ZoneWed Jan 20 1993 18:534
Have an unconfirmed report that Parcells has been named Head
Coach of the Patriots.

JD
56.22PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 20 1993 19:495
    Someone in the Patriouts conference says he called the Globe to ask
    about the Parcells rumors and was told that the Pats HAVE NOT made an
    offer to Parcells.
    
    Seems they're denying their own story.
56.23CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyWed Jan 20 1993 19:5914
    -1,
    Patriouts? I like that Mac. Intentional? TM that baby.
    
    BTW Pats sip.
    
    Was listening to dynamic duo from the FAN ( Mike da mouf and Chris
    the Laughin' Hyena) on the way back from a meeting. Thay say neither
    Parcells to the Pats or Reeves to the Jints is in da bag. 
    HAHA if the Pats do land Parcells, those two maroons will be blasting
    George  "I wanna look like Peter Boyle in Young Frankenstein" Young
    all over the place.  Po Po Jints, nobody wants ta coach 'em. 
    
    MikeL
     
56.24I'll TM it if they move to St.LouieePATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 20 1993 20:053
    Freudian Slip, MikeL.  I saw it and was gonna correct it, but CAM3 is
    so darn slow that I left it.  I figured someone would get a kick out of
    it.
56.26CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 21 1993 12:3427
56.27Parcells as Pats GM Too?SWLAVC::PUGHThu Jan 21 1993 16:194
I heard this AM that the Pats are holding a press conference at 11:15 today
(2:15 Eastern) to announce Parcells as coach AND General Mgr.

Doug
56.28ROYALT::ASHEIt's big, heavy, it's wood...Thu Jan 21 1993 16:4145
>   <<< Note 56.13 by FDCV06::KING "The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!" >>>

>    Parcells has priced him self out and Buddy Ryan is in..
    
>    REK
    
Thanks for the scoop!  (smiley goes here)
    
    Article 6008 of clari.sports.football:
Xref: nntpd.lkg.dec.com clari.sports.football:6008 clari.local.new_england:884 clari.local.massachusetts:968 clari.sports.top:12286
Path: nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!enterpoop.mit.edu!eff!world!uunet!nntp1.radiomail.net!fernwood!looking!clarinews
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.new_england,clari.local.massachusetts,clari.sports.top
Subject: Patriots said to offer coaching job to Parcells
Keywords: football, men's professional
Message-ID: <fbn-parcellsU3JK145pe@clarinet.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 93 16:09:10 PST
Location: new england states, massachusetts
ACategory: sports
Slugword: fbn-parcells
Priority: major
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 163/155; Id: z6751; Sel: xbsf; Adate: 1-20-145pes; V: sked
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
Codes: ysfprxb., &sfprma., tbza....
Lines: 15

	BOSTON (UPI) -- Bill Parcells, the former coach of the New York
Giants, will be offered the New England Patriots' coaching job, the
Boston Globe reported Wednesday.
	The newspaper said club owner James Orthwein and his top aides have
agreed on offering Parcells a lucrative, long-term contract.
	Mike Ditka, recently fired as coach of the Chicago Bears, and Buddy
Ryan, former coach of the Philadelphia Eagles, also were interviewed.
	Dick MacPherson was fired as coach of the Patriots this month and the
man who fired him, Sam Jankovich, the chief executive officer, resigned
the following day.
	The Patriots finished 2-14 this year, tied with Seattle for the NFL's
worst record. New England owns the first pick in the April draft.
	Parcells led the Giants to two Super Bowl titles before resigning in
1991. He has worked as a television commentator for NBC the last two
seasons.


    
56.29FDCV07::KINGThe Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!Thu Jan 21 1993 18:444
    LIKE I SAID EARLIER... Bill Parcells is the new Coach/GM of the
    NE Pats... It was just announced at a press conf. in Boston...
    
    REK
56.30now watch them move the teamFRETZ::HEISERreal men wear purpleThu Jan 21 1993 18:511
    any decent coach would need both positions to clean that mess!
56.31CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 21 1993 19:0420
This has some VERY interesting implications for George Young.


The WORST scenario that George Young could imagine is that Parcells comes
in, and within two or three years turns the Pats around and takes them
to the Bowl, while the Giants are still rebuilding.   

An almost as worse scenario would be if Parcells gets the Pats to the
Bowl, where they meet and beat a Reeves-coached Giants squad.


Either way, the second guessers and NY media will have a field day 
with Young, who could have had Parcells but for some pride....



Congrats Bill!  Hope you take 'em all the way!!!!!


'Saw
56.32METSNY::francusMets in '93Thu Jan 21 1993 19:066
re: .31

Please 'Saw anything but Parcells taking NE to a SB championship. Papers
around here border on the insufferable already. (.5 :-)

The Crazy Met
56.33CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 21 1993 19:1121
>Please 'Saw anything but Parcells taking NE to a SB championship. Papers
>around here border on the insufferable already. (.5 :-)
>
>The Crazy Met

I'd love to see it.

He did it with the Giants, who were almost as bad as this year's Pats.
The Giants were 3-12-1, and within three seasons they had won the 
Bowl.   George Young was the GM, and a case could be made that George
might not be the BEST GM around, so perhaps Bill could do a better
job on that end....

The Pats are another cold weather team, so look for the typical Parcells
offense, which works well late in the season.

Yeah, it's entirely plausible that he could turn the franchise around....


'Saw

56.34NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 21 1993 20:049
                                        
    Yes!  This is the best thing to happen to the Patriots since Chuck
    Fairbanks.  And to think that the media has been all over James 
    Orthwein for knowing nothing about football.  That's been the problem; 
    past owners *thought* they knew football, and were afraid to turn the
    whole thing over to someone who does...
    
    glenn
    
56.35CUPMK::DEVLINLou Gorman &amp; da Master PlanFri Jan 22 1993 11:3620
Pats fans, here's some stuff to expect:

*  Don't expect a winner right away.  Parcels was 3-12-1 wif the Giants in year
    1, I believe.

*  Don't be surprised if you see some familiar Giants faces on the Pats
    sidelines (I won't be surprised to see LT or Simms...)

*  Expect the offense to be smash mouth.  Remember Parcells' motto is:
    "Power wins football games".

*  He'll build a team that can win in the cold in November and December.

It'll be interesting, although I don't go to the heights of hoping for 
Pats success like Chainsaw.

BTW, the Chainsaw has been noted praising hte Cowboys and the Pats, hmm,
his standing as a Giants fan must be questioned. 

JD
56.36CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsFri Jan 22 1993 12:1750
>*  Don't expect a winner right away.  Parcels was 3-12-1 wif the Giants in year
>    1, I believe.

Yes, and they almost fired him.  The nexted season the Giants were back
in the playoffs, losing to San Fran in the second round, 21-10.


>*  Don't be surprised if you see some familiar Giants faces on the Pats
>    sidelines (I won't be surprised to see LT or Simms...)

A lot of talk on WFAN about this.  There is some speculation that Parcells
wouldn't do this, as he has "turned the page on the Giants".



>*  Expect the offense to be smash mouth.  Remember Parcells' motto is:
>    "Power wins football games".

Parcells said that anyone not willing to work hard would be asked to
leave.


>*  He'll build a team that can win in the cold in November and December.

Yep.  I agree 100%.


>It'll be interesting, although I don't go to the heights of hoping for 
>Pats success like Chainsaw.

I'd like to see Parcells do well.  The better Parcells does, the worse
it looks for George Young, who I am beginning to doubt.



>BTW, the Chainsaw has been noted praising hte Cowboys and the Pats, hmm,
>his standing as a Giants fan must be questioned. 

Do me, JD. 8^)

I haven't praised the Cowboys.  I just said that I respected what they
have done with their football team in three season.  Any football
fan would say the same thing.

I haven't praised the Pats.  I am a big Parcells fan, and I want to 
see him do well......



'Saw
56.37CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Fri Jan 22 1993 12:387
    Since I moved away from NE, I haven't followed the team that close.
    
    Is John Stephens trying any harder than a few years back?  Would he be
    traded away if Parcy wasn't happy with his motivation?
    
    I seemed to remember an always hurts, semi-productive Stephens after
    his first great year...
56.38PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 22 1993 13:3424
56.39PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 22 1993 13:364
    Chip, Stephens started showing signs of his rookie season this past
    year.  I think he'll do just fine, or at the very least the Pats will
    get a decent player/draft pick in return from him should they decide to
    go with Russell.
56.40CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is THREE years old!!!Fri Jan 22 1993 13:477
Re: Stevens

The past two seasons his role has been different than his rookie year.  He was 
the running back as a rookie, but mid way through last year he was given the 
starting fullback job.  With his primary responisbility being to block for
Russell or Vaughn, he seemed to be reborn.  Later in both seasons he got a few
carries, as well as some passes out into the flat where he looked good.
56.41CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsFri Jan 22 1993 13:5043
>    I'd be very surprised to see Simms.  The Pats already have 3 QBs they
>    don't know what to do with and there is a push to get a 4th (Bledsoe or
>    Mirer).

My best guess is that they grab Bledsoe.

    
>    Pats fans have been calling that "boring football".  It will be
>    interesting to see how they accept Parcells' offense.  FWIW, the Pats
>    have been trying smash mouth football under the last 3 or 4 coaches. 
>    It hasn't been that successful since Hannah retired, but I think as
>    this young OL continues to gain experience with each other it will get
>    better.  They have a few guys who could become 100 yd/game rushers
>    again.

Giants fans ragged on Parcells offense for years as being boring.  And
it was, but it ate up the clock, kept the ball away from the other team's
offense, and won football games.

I would have preferred a slightly more open offense, but hey, two Super
Bowls ain't bad.

The ONE big drawback of the Giants offense to me was the fact that they
were not a quick strike offense, and if they got down big, it was pretty
much over.  Of course, with their Defense, that rarely happened.

    
>    I don't and hope the fans and front office show the patience required
>    to rebuild this team.  I think Mac was canned prematurely because he
>    didn't bring the Pats to the playoffs in his second season.

I don't know if he can bring them to the 'offs in two years, but he
did it with the Giants.

If Parcells can work his magic the team will be competitive though....


'Saw





56.43AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Jan 22 1993 15:528
56.45exQUASER::JACKSONTAEveryone/thing needs a nameFri Jan 22 1993 16:214
      Parcells won't rest til they get to the big one?  The man will die
    from exhaustion;^)
    
      Tim
56.46CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyFri Jan 22 1993 16:267
    FWIW Tommy,
    That old NBC/Globe sage Will McDonough agrees with ya on Jones of
    FSU. Or didya steal that from him??
    
    Muchos
    MikeL
    
56.47busy today :*(CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeFri Jan 22 1993 16:276
    
    Didn't Stevans also severly injure some guy and end his career and
    then, in addition to the injuries, develop into a bit of a head case?
    
    ????
    
56.49PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 22 1993 18:131
    /Don, you callin' Orthwein a liar?
56.50Heaven forbid BigMac, I wouldn't call Clinton one either...AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Jan 22 1993 18:351
    
56.51CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsFri Jan 22 1993 18:4414
56.52ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Fri Jan 22 1993 18:536
    naughty, naughty 'Saw. See i don't mind much but last time someone tokk
    this type of topic out of the p-name realm by using ^^^^ his hands
    got slapped by one of the mods. JaKE I would protest big time :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.53(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBGet Barbara Bush off the $1 BillFri Jan 22 1993 18:589
    
    >>got slapped by one of the mods. JaKE I would protest big time :-)
                                      ^^^^
    
    The only thing I'll protest is your inept ablility to use the shift key
    properly.
    
    JaKe
    
56.54AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Jan 22 1993 19:004
    	Let's get this topic back on track and talk about the St. Louis
    Patriots!
    
    				/Don
56.55ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Fri Jan 22 1993 19:028
    re: .53
    
    wimp
    
    :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.56PFSVAX::JACOBGet Barbara Bush off the $1 BillFri Jan 22 1993 19:056
    Hey dweeb, who ya callin' a wimp????
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
56.57For /Don....CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsFri Jan 22 1993 19:0612

	Here comes the King here comes the Big Number One.
	Budweiser beer, the beer that's second to none.

	Move to St. Louis, and bring Parcells,
	And ol Foxboro can just go to hell....

	Da da da da da dada dada da daaaaaaaaa
	Da da da da da dada dada da daaaaaaaaa
	Da da da daaaa da, da da da da da
	da da da da da da da da da da da da da ad da da.....
56.58The town that makes that crummy beer deserves the Patsies!AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Jan 22 1993 19:141
    
56.59KALI::MORGANLow-End NaCFri Jan 22 1993 20:297
    The Pats won't draft Mirer or Bledsoe to hand the ball off.  Unless
    they trade the pick, it'll be Marvin Jones.  You can dominate from the
    linebacker position, whereas you need some help to dominate from the
    down lineman position.  So I can't see them taking either of the guys
    from 'bama.
    
    					Steve
56.60CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Jan 25 1993 11:3217
>    The Pats won't draft Mirer or Bledsoe to hand the ball off.  Unless
>    they trade the pick, it'll be Marvin Jones.  You can dominate from the
>    linebacker position, whereas you need some help to dominate from the
>    down lineman position.  So I can't see them taking either of the guys
>    from 'bama.
    
I thought a lot about this this past weekend and I tend to agree.

I also lost sight of the fact that Parcells is of the school of thought
that Defense wins Championships.   That means that he probably will
attempt to bolster the defense first....


I heard Season Tickets sales are going through the roof....


'Saw
56.61I'd even root for the team if they changed the name and logoESKIMO::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Mon Jan 25 1993 11:3518
    
    	Lots of talk on the radio about changing the teams name, color
    and logo.
    
    	some of the ideas....
    
    			Boston Warlocks
    			Boston Warlords
    			Boston Bulldogs
    		 	Boston Beaners
    			Boston Gas
    
    		Re:  Boston Gas - This guy wanted to take the logo and
    				turn the guy around.  :-)
    
    
    
    	WOOF!
56.62CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Jan 25 1993 11:5410
Actually, I'm surprised.

In 1976 the organization wanted to "update" the Patriot symbol, with
a newer, more stylized version, and the fans totally voted it down.


I wish Ninj' was around so we could get some "poop" on what's going on....


'Saw
56.63PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 25 1993 13:297
    Still using the same sources you got all your Browns' news from, I see,
    Hal.
    
    Pats sold over 750 season tickets last Thursday.  The ticket office was
    open all weekend.  People were driving to Foxborough because they
    couldn't get through on the phones.  Football fever has gripped the
    Hub.
56.64Parcells paying off alreadyNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 25 1993 14:2929
                              
    Just goes to show you what is possible if you use a little business
    sense.  Past Patriots' owners would have scoffed at Parcells' asking
    price (as they did with many key players), but before the equipment has
    even been unpacked from last season, Parcells has already generated
    several hundred thousand dollars in new season ticket applications. 
    This is money in the bank collecting interest, money coming in before
    even the renewals are due.
    
    I still like Bledsoe.  I liken the guy's situation to that of Terry
    Bradshaw, in that's he raw, very young, and is coming to the pros from
    a school that isn't known as a perennial power, so he's a bit 
    underrated if not underpublicized.  The kid is still only *20* years 
    old!  To be that big and fast and talented and yet only 20 is highly
    remarkable (not like Vinnie Testaverde's situation, coming out at 24 
    after being red-shirted and/or held back in both high school and 
    college, and maybe even grade school, if the truth be known).  As the
    Dallas Cowboys have proved, there are many ways to build a top-notch
    defense, but very rarely does a franchise QB come for free (and the
    'Boys made the right choice going after Aikman first even though they
    were a pathetic team with many needs at the time).
    
    I trust Bill Parcells with whatever decision he makes, though.  As the
    man himself said at the press conference, he's one of the best talent
    evaluators in the business, and no one thought for a minute that the
    statement was egotistical. 
    
    glenn
    
56.66CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeMon Jan 25 1993 16:2114
    
    Heard a rumor that Bledsoe MIGHT state that he wants to play near home
    and that , like Mr. Ed, if a certain team drafts him, he'll refuse to
    sign with them    ^-(St. Louis?)
    
    Him making that statement hurts the Pats & puts Seattle in a win (no
    trade needed) - win (we get the QB anyway) situation.
    
    Metz, hear anything of this in yo' backyard?
    
    I remain,
    wanting Jones,
    Kev
    
56.67CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Jan 25 1993 16:518
>    and that , like Mr. Ed, if a certain team drafts him, he'll refuse to
>    sign with them    ^-(St. Louis?)
    
If the StL is a question about who first drafted Mr. Ed, it was
Baltimore.....


'Saw
56.68QUASER::JACKSONTAEveryone/thing needs a nameMon Jan 25 1993 17:044
      Isn't the QB that won the heisman coming out in the draft?  Gino
    Terretta or somfin like that.
    
      A heisman is a sure winner, just ask uncle al;^)
56.69NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 25 1993 17:1422
    
    >  It doesn't hurt Aikman that he has the best running back in the
    >  league to hand off to, one of the best receivers in the league to
    >  throw to and one of the best lines in the league to stand behind.
    >  All he has to do is not screw up. Bledsoe ain't gonna have that
    >  luxury.
    
    That's true enough now, Tommy, and it was true with Aikman when the
    Cowboys were 1-15.  Similarly, the Patriots will have to build at many
    positions, and like the Cowboys they won't get that done with a single 
    #1 pick, regardless of where they go.  But I don't think you give 
    Aikman enough credit.  He does more than just "not screw up".  In 
    fact, George Seifert commented that Aikman as much as anyone was the 
    guy who beat his team.  Seifert claimed that they knew what everyone 
    else could do and what they had to do to stop them, and that indeed 
    they had some early success at slowing down Emmitt Smith, but Aikman 
    was damn near perfect.  The kid is a critical piece to the team, not 
    just a lever-puller... 
    
    glenn
    
    
56.70true confessionsFRETZ::HEISERBillary takes U.S. hostageMon Jan 25 1993 17:192
    It deeply pains me to admit this, but I have a hunch that Nother
    Shame's Mirer will be a very good NFL QB.
56.71DECWET::METZGERI don't think so, Tim.Mon Jan 25 1993 17:3417
Bledsoe has repeatedly said that he will play for whatever team drafts him.
He's said it 5 times now and still gets stories written that he'll pull an
Elway. An article in the paper out here said that the Seahawks should try 
and trade up (from the #2 spot) to ensure that they get Bledsoe..Ho-Ho-Ho.

I'd be very happy with the FSU linebacker at the #2 spot or if the Hawks
traded down and picked up some quality O-lineman and Mirer. Decent Qb's can
be gotten via the trade or free agency route. I still think that the Pats
will follow Tommy's theory and draft Graves and the Hawks will pick up Bledsoe 
with the #2 pick.

Toretta won't amount to anything inthe pro's. He's Vinnie Testeverde V2.


Metz
 
56.73Albert DeSalvo look-alikes as cheerleadersTNPUBS::NAZZAROPats - Parade in January 19??Mon Jan 25 1993 17:5114
    Mirer had another less than mediocre game yesterday in the (mumble,
    mumble) All-Star game.  He was 6-15 for 86 yards with 2 INT, and one 
    the completions was a 60+ yarder.  This is a guy who couldn't generate
    much of an offense behind five HS all-americans in the o-line who
    averaged 285 pounds per man, unless he was playing some sub-standard
    big-time pretender like BC.  Mirer will do better once he's away from
    Holtz, but he looks a lot like Browning Nagle to me!
    
    As for naming the Pats, my favorite nickname was the Boston Stranglers.
    The caller suggested a noose for a logo on the side of the helmets.
    And when someone screwed up, you could hang him in effigy in the
    papers.  Lots of possibilities.
    
    NAZZ
56.74CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeMon Jan 25 1993 18:348
    
    Comment by Dale Arnold on the present logo:
    
    	" I mean LOOK at the guy. Look at the expression on his face.  The
    guy looks like he's trying to take a DUMP!"
    
    
    
56.75CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyTue Jan 26 1993 12:2811
    Nazz,
    I've seen Mirer on many occasion and I still think the jury is out
    on him. I noticed vast improvement in the latter half of '92 but
    he dooes have his moments of mediocrity/ineptitude ( see Stanford '92).
    Whereas I agree that he MIGHT have done better stats-wise in more
    open offense than Holtz', is not Parcells projected offense similar
    to ND's? Emphasis on solid running game, ball control and a structured
    controlled passing game?
    
    MikeL
    
56.76about 1000000000000000000000 to 1ROULET::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Tue Jan 26 1993 12:346
    
    	The only way I'd root for the Pats is if they change their name,
    team color, logo and field location.  So, for me to drop the Browns,
    what do you think the chances of the Patsies doing that???
    
    		WOOF!
56.77I like it......CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Jan 26 1993 12:4815
    Somethang like 3,000 new season holders since the Parcells announcement
    lasted Thursday.
    
    Parcell's already hired 8 assistants and is expected to announce 3 more
    maybe today.  Stategically it's great he's moved so fast in hiring his
    assistants because the other teams (like the NY(J) Giants) have yet to
    hire a Head and Parcell's got the jump on the creme-de-la-creme of the 
    assistants....
    
    It's just possible nexted season may turn out NOT to be a disaster?
    
    I remain,
    thinking some home games might be on tee vee too!
    Kev
    
56.78QUASER::JACKSONTAEveryone/thing needs a nameTue Jan 26 1993 13:084
      Is Joe Collier still the defensive man, or did Parcells get rid of
    him?
    
      Tim
56.79Football with a somba beat ...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is THREE years old!!!Tue Jan 26 1993 13:1817
Most notable move by Parcels was the appointment of Ray Perkins, his old boss, 
as o-coordinator.  The remainder of the staff is former Giants assistants.

The d-coordinator (Al Groh?) has no experience as a coordintor, but that is
probably cool, since Parcells will probably be pretty hands on with the D.

re: name, logo

I think they should take an astrological tract with this.  Change the team name
to the Boston Novas.  That way they could have some sort of star as a logo, and
their theme song would be:

"Blame it on the Boston Novas".

Sorry.

=Bob=
56.80CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Jan 26 1993 13:4012
>"Blame it on the Boston Novas".
>
>Sorry.
>
>=Bob=


I know Dickstah, and you, sir, are no Dickstah.....  8^)

'Saw


56.82but with THAT, you did come awfully close! ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Jan 26 1993 13:421
    
56.83CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Jan 26 1993 13:4317
>    With the hiring of Perkins, you could probably bet the Pats won't be
>    drafting a QB.  From all I've heard, he's big on the run, run, run.  
>    So why waste the number one on someone who'd be handing the ball off,
>    when anyone can do that.  Right?


I think you'll see something very similar to what the Giants did 
under Parcells.  I wouldn't call it "run" so much as "ball control".

It will be a conservative offense, with passing that is more controlled.
Look for the TE to get a lot of receptions....

It will also be a very good cold weather offense.....


hth,
'Saw
56.85PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 26 1993 14:144
    I didn't realize that Parcells was with the Pats earlier in his
    career.  Rumor had it he might bring Steve Grogan and Steve Nelson back
    as coaches.  Is this still a possibility given the coaches he's named
    already?
56.86METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Jan 26 1993 14:294
It would be beautiful if the Jets could get Marvin Jones with the 3rd
pick. By all means I hope the Pats take Bledsoe.

The Crazy Met
56.87Zolak? People were amused by his act, not impressed w/his playNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 26 1993 18:1717
                                      
    > I still think 
    > Zolak is good enough to win with and drafting Bledsoe would be a waste.
      
    Bledsoe might be a waste but you're kidding about Zolak, right?  Each
    of the Super Bowl-winning QBs you listed got there because they
    outperformed the opponents' QB (and I think that in this year's Bowl 
    the Aikman vs. Kelly matchup will again be the difference).  When the 
    best go up against the best, the winner must get strong play from the 
    QB position.  Scottie Zolak is not going to take the Patriots or anyone
    else anywhere.  Nor will Tommy Hodson.  Hugh Millen *might* if he can
    stay injury-free, but the clock is running on him.  This hole in the
    Patriots' lineup is not a trivial one...
    
    glenn
    
                                                        
56.89AXIS::ROBICHAUDTue Jan 26 1993 18:5516
	As Mike Childs was saying in another note, we were at the Firehouse 
last Sunday and there was a gaggle of yuppies seriously discussing Bill 
Parcells and the New England Patriots.  This does not bode well for folks 
like Denny, Chap and I.  Look what creeping yuppieism did to the Garden.  
8^(  And with regards to the mascot, I was at the game when the fans voted 
for the old mascot over the squared jaw new one with the American flag in the 
background.  It was against the San Diego Chargers and a Grogan interception 
almost blew the game (surprised?), until Steve Nelson made a goal line 
interception to save the game.  But if you notice over the years the facial 
features have become less gruff (and less manly), to where today's mascot 
almost resembles the one the fans unanimously voted down.  If Parcells 
brings a winner to Foxboro the yuppie caravan will migrate down Rte 1 and 
infect Foxboro.  Of course then, the sissified version of the mascot will be 
quite appropriate.      

				/Don
56.91it's better than getting ReevesCNTROL::CHILDStake me to Roslyn CafeTue Jan 26 1993 20:4310
 Al Groh was the defensive cordinator for the Giants in 91. He wasn't any
 better or worst than Rust....

 So another words GOOD LUCK!!!!!!!!

 Nelson could handle the linebackers and Grogan could handle the QB if
 they need to find posistions for them....

 mike
56.92I was under no illusions about Zolak's prospects...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 26 1993 21:2215
 
    > C'mon , Glenn you were singing a completely different tune not all that 
    > long ago (see below).
    
    While I acknowledge that Zolak's physical skills are superior to 
    Millen's, my comments were mainly directed towards the ridiculous 
    policy of sending a lame QB out to get the hell beat out of him for 
    an 0-10 team, with absolutely nothing to gain for it in a lost season.
    If you think Bledsoe would be a project, then Zolak is doubly so. 
    Zolak has taken very few snaps since *high school*, much less college.
    He was drafted as a long-shot project with a big arm and based on his 
    brief appearances to date I'd say that his status is unchanged...
    
    glenn
    
56.93Bill Parcels isn't going to change this team around in 10 yearsOURGNG::RIGGENWill Note for foodTue Jan 26 1993 21:347
The only reason Bill Parcels tooks this job is cause Mike Ditka can talk into a 
mircophone and not sound like he's got marbles in his mouth. The day Mike 
was fired Bill Parcels was fired by NBC and this guy needs the money to feed his
face and the Patroits picked up the tab.


Jeff
56.94Watch out Colts!!!KALI::MORGANLow-End NaCWed Jan 27 1993 10:4212
    Mike C.
    
    I thought I read that Groh was the linebacker coach for the Gints?
    
    
    Jeff R.
    
    For the first time in history, the Pats have done something that's made
    sense.  I will say right here and now, the Patriots will have a .500 
    record or better next year.
    
    					Steve
56.95CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Jan 27 1993 11:3812
I heard last night on the FAN, in an interview with Dick Ebersole that
Parcells was one of their best analysts, but not the best (he said Trumpy
was).

Parcells had improved a lot during his tenure at NBC but the man wanted
to coach.  


I agree with Steve, Parcells gets them to at least .500 next season...


'Saw
56.96PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 27 1993 12:342
    Any confirmation on Mr. Riggins' assertion that Parcells was fired by
    NBC?
56.97CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Jan 27 1993 13:1210
>    Any confirmation on Mr. Riggins' assertion that Parcells was fired by
>    NBC?

I don't have any confirmation, but if memory serves me correct, he
had another year left on his contract, but had a clause in there that
allowed him to leave if he chose to coach.


'Saw

56.99You naughty Rocky Mt coyoteCTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyWed Jan 27 1993 13:247
    I believe Mr Riggen is cackling agin, having yanked yo' chains.
    
    Careful Jeff, I won't buy you a nearbeer if I get to Coloraddy
    this year.
    
    MikeL
    
56.100METSNY::francusMets in '93Wed Jan 27 1993 14:055
I expect to see replies in the Crow Cafe by both 'Saw and Steve sometime
in December of 1993.

The Crazy Met
56.102Zolak should get the job.AD::HEATHThe jinx is broken, Sox '93 ChampsWed Jan 27 1993 14:3512
    
    
       I would have to agree with .101.  Millen is way overated anyhow.
    With Parcells and Perkins all the Z man is going to have to do is
    give the ball to Russell, Stephens or Vaughn and on occasion toss
    a 10 yarder to Cook.  Why waste the money that Bledsoe is going to
    want when it could be spent on another player that is needed now.
    I would like to see them trade the #1 pick for a proven center and
    with the lower pick in the draft take the best available player
    anyhow.
    
    Jerry
56.103Handing the ball off wasn't enough for the Giants, same w/ Pats...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 27 1993 18:3447
    
    >  Glenn, I usually think you have an intelligent, informed opinion
    >  but this time I think you're doing some serious spin control. You
    
    Call it spin control or just a slight change of opinion, but we did get
    to see Scott Zolak up close and personal 4-5 times (after I said 
    little more than it was obvious that he should be starting ahead of 
    Millen during this lost cause of a season), and I'm sincerely 
    unimpressed by his prospects as an NFL quarterback.  And I'm not 
    sure how my comments came to be construed as an endorsement of Millen. 
    If I thought Millen were an adequate QB for an otherwise championship-
    caliber team, I certainly wouldn't be in the Bledsoe camp.  Millen is
    entirely *inadequte*.  All I've said is that Millen *might* be able to 
    be this "don't make any mistakes"-type QB that others feel is good 
    enough to win big in the NFL, but which I don't.
    
    > And personally, I think the quarter-
    > back postion is overrated anyways. Of the last ten or so Super Bowl 
    > winners the only team that had a bonafide "franchise" QB was the '9ers 
    > with Montana and even he had the the best offensive supporting cast, a 
    > dominating defense, strong special teams and the game's best coach/tact-
    > ician.
    
    I think the issue has become confused here.  We're not debating which
    is the single most important aspect to football, we're talking about
    the decision on a single draft pick, *one* player.  The Patriots are 
    not able with that one pick to draft an entire offensive line, or an 
    entire linebacking crew, or kicking game, or special teams squad, or
    any of the other areas of the game you've intimated are more important
    than QB play (some I agree with, some I don't).  It's strictly a
    decision on one player, unless they trade for a package, which both of
    us have agreed we don't want to see.  I submit that even on the teams 
    that have won it all without a "franchise" QB, the QB was still either 
    the most, or at least the second- or third-most important *single* 
    player on the team.  I think that the Phil Simmses, Doug Williamses, 
    Mark Rypiens and such did much, much more than just hand the ball off 
    and get out of the way without making any mistakes.  I don't think that
    anyone the Patriots currently have at QB is even close to being able to 
    fill the duties that these players did.  
    
    Whether the Patriots should look for a QB through the draft or by other 
    means is a good question, but they'll eventually have to get one, or at 
    best they'll end up as bridesmaids as I think current teams like 
    Pittsburgh, San Diego, and Kansas City will unless they do the same... 
    
    glenn
    
56.105Blah blah blahOURGNG::RIGGENWill Note for foodWed Jan 27 1993 21:125
The single best thing the Patroits have done in is adding grass to Foxbourgh.

Parcells is gonna collect a check till the bank runs dry. This team needs 
MONEY to win football games. The last time I checked the owners don't have very 
deep pockets specially since they have them a high priced coach.
56.106DECWET::METZGERDoughnuts. Is there anything they can't do?Wed Jan 27 1993 22:1611
You got it baby. In the new football era of free agency you'll
see the owners with deeper pockets purchasing themselves
some good teams.

Arguements that rich owners haven't been able to buy the WS in
baseball do not apply to football, a sport where the more
talented team wins a significantly larger portion of the time
than baseball.

Metz
56.107ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Thu Jan 28 1993 01:4211
    re: .106
    
    Free agency has also not won NBA championships, that of course is
    because of the salary cap. Football has a salary cap mechanism as well
    so teams will not be able to spend past a certain point. Only time will
    tell if free agency will readically change the balance in the NFL to
    the richer teams. Remember all teams share in TV revenue which is a
    great equalizer.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.108KALI::MORGANLow-End NaCThu Jan 28 1993 10:4521
    Have to agree with the Met on that one.  If I'm not mistaken, were the
    salary cap in effect today, the Skins, 49ers, Buffalo and a couple more
    would already be over the cap, thereby denying them the opportunity to 
    sign any free agents.  I'd guess that a team like Dallas, loaded with a
    bunch of young stars, would be at or near the cap quite soon.  Of
    course, if they can keep them all in Dallas they shouldn't have any
    worries.
    
    The difference in football and basketball is that in football, teams
    are more willing to dump an aging veteran much quicker than in the NBA.  
    For example, Robert Parish and Kevin McHale would be long gone if their 
    career of choice had been the NFL, yet they're still pulling in serious 
    money playing hoop.
    
    Regarding the Pats, I'd say this'll be Andre Tippett's last year.  He's
    not anywhere near the player he once was, but commands a high salary
    nonetheless.  If the players thought that management was quick with the
    knife in the past, I'd guess that they will be even more so in the
    future. 
    
    					Steve
56.109PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 28 1993 12:416
56.110Budweiser money is very old and very deep...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 28 1993 12:4433
                       
> Arguements that rich owners haven't been able to buy the WS in
> baseball do not apply to football, a sport where the more
> talented team wins a significantly larger portion of the time
> than baseball.
    
    Huh?  It's true that the most talented teams in baseball win less on a
    percentage basis, but that's why they play 162 games.  The talent still
    rises to the top, especially with a more selective playoff system in
    place.  I think what you're implying is that the game of baseball
    itself is "flukier", Metz, and I'd have to disagree if we're talking
    about the regular season.  The reasons that free agency won't destroy
    competitive balance in football are the same as in baseball: 1) there
    aren't enough starting spots on the "rich" teams to accomodate all the
    talented players, 2) even "poor" teams will actively pursue free
    agents, especially so in the NFL with its 100% equitable TV
    revenue-sharing system, and 3) the benefits of the free agent market
    are highly unpredictable to begin with, as time and time again owners
    have demonstrated that they will throw themselves at "sure thing" 
    veteran players who have undoubtedly had their better days with someone 
    else.
    
    Besides, in the case of the Patriots and James Orthwein we are talking 
    about very deep pockets anyway.  About as deep as they come, folks.
    He certainly has the capital to shape this team anyway he wants, and it
    makes sense to do so even if he is going to sell (in my opinion, as I
    think that the NE football market has tremendous potential that is as
    yet untapped).  The question is whether he will have the time to follow
    through and do so, but so far with the Parcells and assistant hirings
    the signs are good...
    
    glenn
    
56.111CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 28 1993 12:449
>    I think you need new sources, Jim.  Orthwein's pockets are deep thanks
>    to ties with Anheuser-Busch.


In addition, Parcells is already drawing folks in.  The recent season
ticket sales show that.


'Saw
56.112John Cooper for PR directorCTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyThu Jan 28 1993 13:1913
    
    Heard this little bit of news on the radio.
    Pats are going to dump their helmet logo as well as change their
    uniform color. They're checking with NFL Properties and are looking
    into sveral new designs. Supposedly they're looking at retaining the
    red jerseys, and incorporating silver pants and helmets wif a new logo.
    
    Jeez, almost like Ohio St. Let's hope they don't continue to play like
    the Buckeyes.
    
    MikeL
     
    
56.113AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Jan 28 1993 13:269
	RE: Parcells salary.

	Well Jeff, the Patriots have already sold about 1,500 season 
tickets and that translates to about 500K extra the team has that would not 
be in the coffers had they not hired Parcells.  And who knows how much 
revenue would've been lost in season ticket cancellations had the team not 
hired Parcells.  Sounds like a smart financial move too.

				/Don
56.115the burning questionCSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketThu Jan 28 1993 15:527
Has any coach ever won it all with two different teams?  Either Super
Bowl or pre-Super Bowl.  I know that Don Shula has lost the SB with
two different teams (Colts and Dolphins), but don't know about the
winning.  For that matter, has any coach other than Shula lost it
all with two different teams.

Jerry
56.116AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlewThu Jan 28 1993 15:565
    	Weeb Ewbanks won it all with the Colts in "The Greatest Game
    Ever Played 'Cuz it was played in New York" and with the Jets in
    "The Greatest Super Bowl ever played 'Cuz a New York team won".
    
    				/Don
56.117CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Thu Jan 28 1993 16:197
    Mebbe they'll make if official and put little "x"'s over Patsy's 
    eye's...   ;-)
    
    I'd like to see'm go to a White hell-mutt with a red stripe, keep it
    plain like the Dawgs or Penn-State.
    
    (I bet they get crazy and make it real busy)
56.118Can you say incoming?CSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketThu Jan 28 1993 19:204
For their helmets, I'd like to see a picture of Saddam Hussein, looking
upward, with a look of sheer terror on this face.

Jerry
56.119CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 28 1993 19:394
I dunno, maybe it's me but I LIKED their helments and their uniforms....


'Saw
56.121I know, Tommy, I've got TOO much free time 8^)CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 28 1993 19:5816
> >> I dunno, maybe it's me but I LIKED their helments and their uniforms....
>    
>    Nope. It ain't just you. I like 'em just the way they are, too.


Well, I see I'm in some FINE company then.  

I'm a bit of a traditionalist.  I'm not usually too upset when colors
change (ie the Oilers going from a silver helmet with blue oil rig,
to a white helmet with blue oil rig) but I don't like to see the logos
change too much.

I think they should leave them.  And I might just write them a letter
and tell them that too.   

'Saw
56.122what a surpriseFRETZ::HEISERFREE Dallas Cowboy hats!Thu Jan 28 1993 20:291
    Tommy and I finally agree on something.
56.123FDCV06::KINGThe Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!Fri Jan 29 1993 11:255
    The helmut design s*cks bigtime.... I rather they go with
    something of New Endland folklore... Like Kaim being burned at the
    stake.... Or someone sitting on a chair being dunked...
    
    REK
56.125I *get into* my teamsFRETZ::HEISERFREE Dallas Cowboy hats!Fri Jan 29 1993 15:256
>       the NBA. But I think you may be just a little to fanatical about
>       'em. Sort of a John Hinckley/*Travis Bickle/Get-a-hobby type fanat-
>       ical.
    
    I was like that over the Celts too when they had an active Dream
    Teamer.
56.127METSNY::francusCertified Member-Larry Bird JihadTue Feb 02 1993 17:224
Not sure why the connection between New Jersey and New England. The
2 are definitely different.

The Crazy Met
56.128CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowTue Feb 02 1993 18:0113
>Not sure why the connection between New Jersey and New England. The
>2 are definitely different.

It's close, as compared with Seattle.

Parcells spent time coaching in West Point (close to New England) and
for the Pats before coming to the Giants....


Probably has something to do with all those reasons....


'Saw
56.130DECWET::METZGERDoughnuts. Is there anything they can't do?Tue Feb 02 1993 21:1010
Actually the lifestyles between New England and seattle are pretty close. The
seattle area mirrors the northshore of Mass. I'd say there was more of a contrast
between the sewage dumps of Jersey and New England than Seattle and NE.  :-)

Which doesn't even come close to the lifestyle differences between the south
and NE.


Metz
56.131CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowTue Feb 02 1993 21:3211
>Actually the lifestyles between New England and seattle are pretty close. The
>seattle area mirrors the northshore of Mass. I'd say there was more of a contrast
>between the sewage dumps of Jersey and New England than Seattle and NE.  :-)

I realized that I had made a slight blunder using Seattle as an example.
I was just looking at distance.

Seattle is a lot like New England, except the folks are far friendlier....


'Saw
56.133AXIS::ROBICHAUDVideo Poker - Parimutuel's PanaceaWed Feb 03 1993 14:266
    	If I were the Patriots I would do anything in my power to get
    Reggie White on the team.  It would sell more tickets and upgrade
    the defense by at least 25%.  He may not want to come here, but
    it doesn't hurt to try.
    
    				/Don
56.134Get real!!PBST::BROWNAre you a Turtle?Wed Feb 03 1993 15:487
	I doubt seriously that Reggie White would want to go to the Patsies no
matter how much they payed. He wanted that SB Ring for some time and knows NE has
little or no chance of getting their during whats left of his career.


   Cadzilla
56.135Reggie White + Dawgs = Playoff contenderROULET::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Wed Feb 03 1993 16:086
    
    	Reggie White will sign with the Cleveland Browns...its a done deal!
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
56.136NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 03 1993 18:528
    
    I dunno, I like the fact that Bill Parcells has been dropping Reggie
    White's name a lot in public lately.  Whether he'd come is another
    story, but when Big Bill lets the media know that Reggie is "the
    best there is", it can't hurt...
    
    glenn
     
56.137Giants, Redskins, Cowboys,9er's Patsies NOTPBST::BROWNAre you a Turtle?Wed Feb 03 1993 20:374
And him being the best there is ?? would give you the idea he would like to play
for the best there is and not New England.

56.138ROYALT::ASHEIt's big, heavy, it's wood...Wed Feb 03 1993 20:465
    Why would he sign with the Browns when he could sign with the Erlers
    and rejoin Buddy Ryan?
    
    I heard the 'Skins have the inside track anyway...
    
56.139Or do the 9ers plan on losing Joe?DECWET::METZGERDoughnuts. Is there anything they can't do?Wed Feb 03 1993 21:516
Don't those top tier teams (skins, 49ers..etc.) have to lose a free agent before
they can sign one?


Metz
56.140ACESMK::FRANCUSCertified Member-Larry Bird JihadThu Feb 04 1993 03:1711
    Only the 4 final playoff teams must lose a player to free agency before
    being able to sign one; fwiw Dallas will definitely lose Burlein (sp?)
    
    The next 4 teams can sign a limited number of players, not sure how
    many.
    
    All other teams (including the 4 first round losers in the playoffs)
    can sign as many free agents as they want.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.141football + Cleveland = supportROULET::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Thu Feb 04 1993 11:178
    
    	The reason Reggie White will sign with the Browns is because
    there is a commitment to winning in Cleveland.  Cleveland is a
    real football town!  
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
56.142NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 04 1993 12:239
    
    Reggie White is an unrestricted free agent not because of his contract 
    status but as a result of the settlement of the lawsuits in which he
    was a plaintiff (he cannot be tagged as a "franchise player" by the 
    Eagles, etc.).  As such, I believe that he can sign with any team 
    without compensation or limitation...
    
    glenn
    
56.143GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseThu Feb 04 1993 13:1819
    Reggie White is still bound by the Rooney Rule, which says that he
    cannot sign with any of the final four teams (Miami, SF, Buffalo and
    Dallas) unless they lose the same value free agent. For example, if
    Beurline (sp) signs with another team for $3 million a season, Dallas
    could sign Reggie for the same $3 million a season. Other than that,
    the final eight teams (includes the Eagles, Washington, San Diego and
    Pittsburgh) may only sign one free agent over $1.5 million without
    having a matching free agent that the lost, similar to the final four
    arrangement. Any of the final eight teams may sign as many free agents
    as they want for under $1 million a player.
    
    IMO, the only team that has a shot at Reggie from the final four is
    Dallas, losing Beurline (sp). The only other free agent that any of
    those teams that will get close to what White will demand is Steve
    Young, and he will more than likely be either designated a "franchise"
    player or will be one of the 49ers match players.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
56.144METSNY::francusCertified Member-Larry Bird JihadThu Feb 04 1993 14:008
SF could lose Montana so they could sign a free agent.

White would be a free agent since his contract is over. The clause
regarding the lawsuit is that he cannot be designated as a franchise
player, but the Eagles might not have done that anyway.

The Crazy Met
56.145AXIS::ROBICHAUDVideo Poker - Parimutuel's PanaceaThu Feb 04 1993 14:344
    	I thought that the club had an option for one more year on Montana
    and that Steve Young was a free agent.
    
    				/Don
56.146GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseThu Feb 04 1993 21:208
    Montana is indeed under contract for a bit yet with the 49ers.
    
    Reggie White has been given a qualifing offer from the Eagles. It was
    some legal deal so that they may be in line for some type of draft pick
    as compensation if White signs elsewhere.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
56.147My suspicion is that this has "trade down" written all over itNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 17 1993 12:4713
    
    Unless they're bluffing, the local papers are reporting that the Patriots 
    are in the market for a QB with the #1 pick, Bledsoe or Mirer, depending 
    on whom you believe.  According to the Glob, Marvin Jones is out of the
    running because he measures up at only 6'1", 235 lbs, which might allow
    him to become a fine conventional inside linebacker (which is basically
    what he was at FSU), but not the monster dominant pass-rushing all-purpose
    LB/DE in the LT or Derrick Thomas mold.  Apparently none of the
    defensive players available this year measures up in this regard,
    including Alabama DEs Curry and Copeland.
    
    glenn
     
56.149CUPMK::DEVLINTime to Pay the Bill for the 1980'sWed Feb 17 1993 13:201
Last year, Taylor was listed at 6'3" 243 lbs.
56.150I still like the franchise-QB idea, and will take either one...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 17 1993 13:2326
    That is admittedly the problem with QB.  Any or all of them could turn
    out to be a Marc Wilson.  But I don't think the comments about Bledsoe
    were physically comparing him to Wilson, they were just general
    statements on college "systems", which if you think it through
    shouldn't matter if your talent evaluators know what they're doing
    (anyone can go to the "right" school and put up good numbers; these
    guys are supposed to see through that).  There is no comparison 
    physically between Wilson and Bledsoe or Mirer.  Wilson couldn't run 
    and didn't have a very strong arm, nor was he even that highly 
    regarded by the pros (I think).  And of course no one is complaining 
    about the BYU system in the case of Steve Young, who does have the 
    tremendous physical skills.
    
    >  Granted, 6'1" 235lbs isn't all that big by NFL standards but how much
    >  bigger are Derrick Thomas and LT ? I'd be surprised if Thomas was much
    >  over 235. Speed is his forte. And LT always played at about 245, no?
    
    I think the concern is more with his height, not his weight.  If you 
    have the frame for it you can always add weight anyway.  You can't get
    taller to get in a QB's face or to use arm extension to slip blockers.
    But I think that at best Jones could develop into a Wilber
    Marshall-type (and there's certainly nothing wrong with that).
    
    glenn
    
56.151RUGBY1::wayJ. Edgar -- G-man wearin' a G-stringWed Feb 17 1993 13:308
I think back to Lambert playing at 220!  8^)


LT is around 245, but he has a lot of strength on that frame and
his arms are massive.


'Saw
56.152SOLANA::MAY_BRKnow new Taxrifices\Wed Feb 17 1993 13:315
    
    the Cardinals are planning on taking which Alabama DE is left by the
    4th pick.  Hopefully the PAts will take a QB
    
    brews
56.154NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 17 1993 14:4922
    
    Yeah, I saw the quote and I'm still not sure what the unnamed AFC East
    GM (probably old friend Dick Steinberg) means by them.  If you 
    substitute Mirer's name and say "if he is just another Marc Wilson and 
    you use the first pick to take him, it's a disaster" is the statement 
    any less valid?  Or does the PR associated with Mirer's name cover him?  
    As has been documented many times in here, Rick Mirer was *not* an 
    up-on-my-shoulders-boys big game performer, and you'd think that 
    playing at Notre Dame would help a QB more than playing at Washington 
    St., so I'm at a total loss as to who this Rick Mirer was that was winning
    games for Notre Dame "on his own".  I suspect that the guy likes Mirer, 
    which is fine, but "big game performer" and "another Marc Wilson" 
    sounds too much like empty rhetoric for me.  You'd like to think that 
    they're a bit more scientific than that.
    
    Again, I don't care who they take; just get the right man.  Break out
    the films and the tape measures and radar guns and stopwatches and 
    psychological tests and whatever else it is that Bill Parcells likes 
    to use and get the right guy...
    
    glenn
     
56.155CAMONE::WAYJ. Edgar -- G-man wearin' a G-stringWed Feb 17 1993 15:0113
>    psychological tests and whatever else it is that Bill Parcells likes 
>    to use and get the right guy...
    
You gotta get a guy that he can give a nickname to, like when the Giants
got Elliot.  He supposedly got the Jumbo nickname because at the end of
one of his first practices they were gonna run laps around the field,
and he was plodding along, and Parcells yelled out "C'mon there, Jumbo"

The name stuck....


'?Saw     

56.157AXIS::ROBICHAUDHOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknightWed Feb 17 1993 16:144
    	Rick Mirer?  The one that played for ND?  I thought Parcells
    was going to build a mainly team?  8^(
    
    				/Don
56.158It does make for interesting speculation...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 17 1993 16:2119
        > As for being more "scientific",
        > I think they're already *too* scientific. There has to come a point
        > when the numbers only mean so much and what it comes down to is, *is
        > the guy a football player?*.
    
    This much I wholeheartedly agree with.  Inside of some reasonable
    physical parameters I think devoted film study is probably the best bet
    in evaluating talent.  At least you're watching the guy play football.
    I just got a chuckle from the comments of this unidentified "AFC East 
    GM", who was even referring to Bill Walsh not by name but as "The 
    Genius" (a nickname that's supposed to be reserved for Jerry Glanville).  
    I just wonder if this interview was all on the up-and-up or if there 
    isn't some chicanery going on.  By the same token Bill Parcells may have 
    his true intentions completely hidden from the media, and may be going
    in a different direction entirely.
    
    glenn
      
56.159Will the real Rick Mirer stand up please?CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyWed Feb 17 1993 16:3551
    
    Performing well at the end of a game is often the overriding factor
    in armchair judging of college QB's by us masses. I often overlook
    (when it's not ND) what happened the first 40-45 minutes that creates
    the setting for those last few minutes( read Elway ad nauseum).
    
    Having said that, I've got some strong opinions on Mirer relating to
    that. Yes, Mirer has performed well in several games at the end, and
    more importantly throughout the whole game. Examples being Michigan
    '90, Michigan State '90, Penn St '92 (altho glenn will claim it was the
    Penn St prevent defense!). Several games he has come out solid in the
    first half only to "disappear in half 2; Penn St '90, Stanford '90,
    Colorado Orange Bowl, Tennessee '91.  And other games he shoulda 
    stayed in bed; Stanford '92, Penn St '91. 
    Mirer, INO, has been consistently inconsistent in his overall
    college performance. Quarters of brilliance followed by quarters 
    of mediocrity and ineptitude.  I don't know if you chalk that
    up to immaturity, not being totally comfortable with Holtz'
    run-oriented, controlled pass offense, lack of concentration,
    confidence, or even "feeling the footsteps". I assume it's a
    combination of all. But let me say this; after the Stanford debacle,
    I thought "here we go again" Mirer is up to his old Jekyll/Hyde
    tricks. But for the rest of his senior year, Mirer was immense in
    general.
    
    The knock on Mirer is that he was not perceived as a " take charge"
    guy in the huddle and seemed a little tentative at times in crunch 
    time. He certainly has shownm a history of that, particularly his
    junior year. Also, he had not handl;ed a good pash rush during his
    career. He seemed to freeze up agasinst a solid pass rush ( read
    Stanford '92). 
    
    If you look at the above knocks, you will also see a guy who came
    up huge against Penn St in '92, Tennessee in '90, Michigan in '90,
    and Florida in the Sugar in the fourth quarter of each game. 
    He's an enigma. His postives are his mobility, scrambling, and
    yes, passing skills. He can pass both in the pocket and on the run.
    He's 6'2, 215. The scouts say he's got a "good arm', not great. Well
    I think he has a gun, maybe not quiteas strong as Elway or Bledsoe, but 
    cetainly not weak. He can throw the cross field look-in.
    
    So to sum up, He's got immense talent and needs to gain consistensy.
    If the real Rick Mirer is the quarterback that looked damned good
    against BC, Penn St, USC and Texas A&M to close out the ND season,
    then he can be a franchise-type player. 
      
    I haven't seen much of Bledsoe so I can't comment. Let me say this,
    though. If Parcells feels that either one can be a great QB, then
    you have to take that man. Franchise QB's do not grow on trees.
    
    
56.161sorry to bust your collective bubblesMKFSA::LONG&quot;just keep it between the lines&quot;Wed Feb 17 1993 17:3112
	Let's face it folks.  We can sit here and thrash through stats 	and 
	opinions, but it's all nothing more than a crap shoot!  Sure, if the
	player you hype up now turns out to be a REAL NFL player than you
	can do the rooster strut and puff that old chest out and say, "I told
	yunz guys!"  But if he doesn't, which unfortunately is more often the
	case, who cares?  

	After all these are the Patriots we are talking about, right?

	nyuk, nyuk,

	Bill
56.162DECWET::METZGERZeros and Ones....Wed Feb 17 1993 19:5130
I can't seriously believe that people are buying this Bledsoe is a product of
the WSU system crap. WSU was a school on the verge of being an annual Pac-10
patsy after Erickson left. Along comes Bledsoe and after getting hammered his
freshman year (even then I was more enamored of him than Mark Brunnel).

His sophomore year he started to lead an othewise mediocre team back out of
the trenches. The cougs got hammered by the huskies in the Apple cup again
but Bledsoe still looked worlds better than almost any college QB i'd seen
that year.

This year he led a team with some decent wide recievers and an average running
back to a bowl game. If anybody saw the apple cup this year where Bledsoe
was the only person unaffected playing in a blizzard you'd realize that he 
is definately the #1 qb in the college game.

I've seen plenty of Rick Mirer and probably 7 games with Bledsoe and Bledsoe
is 10x the QB mirer is. Not only are his physical tools better but so is his
consistancy, ability to read defenses and attitude.

Granted he got to show his strengths in the pass oriented WSU system but he
wasn't throwing behind the O-line of the Irish, to the WR's of the Irish and
he didn't have 2 NFL class running backs with him in the backfield either.

It's a serious snowjob by the NFl dudes...

Bledsoe will be the 1st QB taken and he'll be an Aikman type franchise QB for
the team that gets him...

Metz
56.163just yankin your chain...MKFSA::LONG&quot;just keep it between the lines&quot;Wed Feb 17 1993 21:224
    So Metz, what you are saying here is that you don't have an opinion
    one way or the other?
    
    Bill
56.164WhewCTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyThu Feb 18 1993 02:1413
    Well Metz,
    I'll go halfway and agree with ya on Mirer in some aspects; Mirer had
    the offensive line, etc. but ND's offense was not the pass-oriented
    deal that Bledsoe had (here I'm taking your word for this, having
    watched glimpses of him in the bowl game) and he has his faults.
    
    Buut if you expect me to believe that Bledsoe is 10X better than Mirer,
    then I'm Robert Parish' mailman. Git real main!
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
56.165fwiwJUPITR::MIOLAPhantomThu Feb 18 1993 06:3911
    
    
    should prove interesting if they take a QB...
    
    From the latest poop I've heard...
    
    Bill P. now is leaning towards Bledsoe after his interviews, and
    Perkins wants Mirer because he doesn't feel like Bledsoe takes football
    serious enough because of the Bungie Jumping.
    
    Lou
56.166SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Thu Feb 18 1993 09:547
    I don't see Parcells going for a franchise QB so much as going after
    what he feels is a potential NFL QB who can run Parcells' type of 
    offense.  If he selects a QB as #1, then it must be his opinion that 
    this is the best place to start, given the talent available, regardless
    of the position.  
    
    Lee 
56.168MKFSA::LONGI got friends in low placesFri Mar 26 1993 10:266
	new logo???

	what's it look like?


	Billl
56.170AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingFri Mar 26 1993 14:514
    	Like I said in another note the logo looks like "The Old Man
    In The Mountain" on LSD.  Hope they like it in Saint Looee.
    
    				/Don
56.171SALEM::DODABill's Pork Parade Rolls onFri Mar 26 1993 15:177
Re: st. Louie

Almost average things come to those who wait?

Nah, they're stayin.

daryll
56.172TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie has a tooth!!!Fri Mar 26 1993 16:4119
To continue Slasher's QB conversation in the STEELER'S note (I always capitalize
STEELERS in recognition of JaKe):

Hugh Millen is a decent QB, who can take a hit without suffering from the Jeff
Hostetler Happy Feet Syndrome.  He's not a superstar, and I suspect that Scott
Secules will give them about the same job for half the money.  Of course none 
of this matters until the Pats get a center who could stop Irene Ryan from 
penetrating the backfield.

re:Logo

I don't think logos per se is what is selling team clothing these days.  
Kids seem to be more attracted to colors than anything else.  Unless the 
Pats change their colors to teal and black, don't look for them to sell a
whole lot of apparel.

I dunno, give me good old Packer green and gold any day.

=Bob=
56.173CAMONE::WAYShane, The Wonder DogFri Mar 26 1993 16:4720
>
>I don't think logos per se is what is selling team clothing these days.  
>Kids seem to be more attracted to colors than anything else.  Unless the 
>Pats change their colors to teal and black, don't look for them to sell a
>whole lot of apparel.

I recently receive e-mail that in a momentous decision, the BofD decided
to change OUR logo from blue to some queer shade of (flip wrist when 
you say it) maroon.

Now, most sports clothing today is going towards black, closely followed
by the "cowboy's blue" that the Whalers recently switched to.  Those colors
were chosen primarily because of their marketability to buyers in pro
shops.

So, leave it to DEC to pick a POWER color for their new logo.....


'Saw

56.174MKFSA::LONGI got friends in low placesFri Mar 26 1993 18:105
	The only Mainly colors are BLACK and GOLD.

	IMHO

	billl
56.175CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Fri Mar 26 1993 18:182
    I heard they used Lucky Lindburgh for the profile...  Makes it an
    easier conversion when the move!   ;-)
56.176but maybe on the helmetMAYES::MAILLOUXMon Mar 29 1993 16:2910
    
    
    	Is it just coincidence that red, white and blue are the colors
        for the state of Missouri as well as for Bud!! Mr. Gee made
        mention of this in the Herald yesterday. They also had two
        logo's, one with the Granite face the other without. I don't
        want to say the writing is on the wall but...
    
    
        RM
56.177drugs explain itHBAHBA::HAASDisoriented Wandering AdultThu Apr 01 1993 13:519
I seen the new logo and uniforms on ESPN and while I don't know about the
old man in the mountain, but someone is doing LSD. Could be something
outta Heavy Metal. Even the guys who were wearing the new togs looked
embarassed, like maybe they weren't getting enough money for all the
humiliation they were suffering.

Can't wait to see how this looks on the field ;-(

TTom
56.178ROYALT::ASHEAnd if you... just go ahead nowThu Apr 01 1993 14:122
    Looked to me like some good Arena football jerseys...
    
56.179QUASER::JACKSONTACmon baby,finish what you startedThu Apr 01 1993 14:321
      I was thinking  USFL Jerseys....
56.180MKFSA::LONGI got friends in low placesThu Apr 01 1993 14:357
	I know that putting this in here I could be tossed right outa
	"Traditionalists Anonymous", but I really thought it looked ok
	on the silver helmet.  My only concern, from the marketing side,
	is how will it look on the baseball caps?  My guess is about as
	dumb as the Seahawk.

	billl
56.181paranoid hallicination?HBAHBA::HAASDisoriented Wandering AdultThu Apr 01 1993 14:598
>	... My only concern, from the marketing side,
>	is how will it look on the baseball caps?  My guess is about as
>	dumb as the Seahawk.

Based on how it looked on the football helmets, I think "dumb" is being
charitable.

TTom
56.182SNAX::ERICKSONThe snow has melted, time to tee off!Thu Apr 01 1993 15:054
	It sounds like the real logo is the new face on top of the "P"
in Patriots. The new face is only by itself on the helmets and uniform
sleeve. For merchandise like hats, the logo will be 
56.184CAMONE::WAYShane, The Wonder DogThu Apr 01 1993 15:2422
It's pretty funny in a way.

The team has become a laughing stock in the past couple of season.

They got a new coach, who has a good reputation for turning losers into
winners, and that's good.

So why didn't they just leave the old, staunch, traditional logo alone
for a couple of years until they were winning.  Folks are a lot less
likely to criticize a winning team than a losing one.

Now, when they lose a game, not only will the fans beat up the team
but the logo as well...


It would be one thing, if they had a really stupid logo to begin
with (like the Whalers green road unis).  Then, if they changed and it
improved, then it's cool (like the Whalers going to blue).  But the
Pats old logo was so much better.....


'Saw
56.185ROYALT::ASHEAnd if you... just go ahead nowThu Apr 01 1993 17:402
    What did the Chicago Blitz uniforms look like?
    
56.186Beam me upMAYES::MAILLOUXThu Apr 01 1993 20:075
    
    	I don't think the logo's that bad, compared to say ah a Buffalo
        with a lazer beam sticking out of it ;^)
    
        RM
56.187AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingFri Apr 02 1993 14:156
    	The Patriots Cost Cutting Measures continue as Irving Fryar
    is now a Dolphin.  With the increase in ticket sales and the decrease
    in payroll the profit made this season may just cover the moving
    costs to St. Louis.
    
    				/Don
56.188PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Apr 02 1993 15:516
56.189NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Apr 02 1993 15:589
    
    I actually think the worst thing that the Pats did was change the base 
    uniform color from red to blue.  Color establishes a team's most basic
    identity, even before the logo design.  Alas, this movement toward the
    "attractive" colors is starting to dominate all sports, such as the
    movement in baseball towards every wannabe looking like the LA Dodgers.
    
    glenn
    
56.190AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingFri Apr 02 1993 16:139
    	Bill Parcells is GOD!  Everything the Patriots have done so
    far is GREAT!  When I got home last night I burnt all my OLD Patriots
    hats, shirts etc and am looking forward to spending this and next
    week's paychecks on the NEW stuff!  I only hope for two things,
    first that the EVIL media leave PARCELLS and ORTHWEIN alone and
    second that the PATRIOTS raise ticket prices so they can scrape
    up enough money to keep the TEAM here!
    
    				/Don
56.191CTHQ::LEARYUNC:AnomalyOnHorizon;CHAMPEENSHIPFri Apr 02 1993 16:1412
    Hey Waugamain!!
    Welcome back from spring training!  Where's yo' trip report?
    Did ya see Dick Radatz?? Tell me, do the Sox REALLY have a chance for
    5th place??
    
    And on the Pats' scene.... local radio personalities Tom Doyle and
    Craig Condiment on WEEI have created a new personality for their
    show... Puxatawney Bill.. you guessed it, the new haid coach of the
    Pats who only comes out ta see his shadow.  Kinda humorous.
    
    MikeL
    
56.192AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingFri Apr 02 1993 16:154
    ...Oh yeah, and I also hope the STATE raises our TAXES to build
    this WONDERFUL franchise the kind of stadium they deserve!
    
    				/Don
56.193CAMONE::WAYRIP #7Fri Apr 02 1993 16:2211
>    ...Oh yeah, and I also hope the STATE raises our TAXES to build
>    this WONDERFUL franchise the kind of stadium they deserve!


Heard on WFAN yesterday that the NFL is now telling the Patriots that 
they need to have a domed stadium in Boston.  

It didn't sound too facetious, but you never know......


'Saw
56.194AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingFri Apr 02 1993 16:255
    	NOTHING is too good for the PATRIOTS 'Saw!  I'm more than willing
    to fork over 25% of my paycheck if it will keep PARCELLS and ORTHWEIN
    happy!
    
    				/Don
56.195awaken note! Awaken...CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeFri Apr 09 1993 16:548
    
    Yabbut I think the new logo was snitched from a '42 (or wuz that '52?)
    DeSoto hood ornament!
    
    I remain,
    traditionally yours!
    Kev
    
56.196It's almost draft day; how about it?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 21 1993 17:0112
    
    What do you guys think of this proposal to trade the #1 pick to San
    Francisco for two low first-round picks, a low second, and a third? 
    The selection numbers are #18, #27, #57, and #83.  That's quantity, but
    the picks in general seem too low for the kind of players available at
    the top this year.  Didn't the Pats get the #10 and #12 picks for only
    a #4 a few years ago, which they effectively wasted on Singleton and 
    Agnew?  As a fan and not a draft or talent guru, I know I don't like 
    the sounds of this...
    
    glenn
    
56.197METSNY::francusABPWed Apr 21 1993 17:125
As a fairly objective observer of the Pats I would say they should not make that
deal. The quality available seems to fall off somewhere in the 10-15 pick range.

The Crazy Met
56.198Waiting for Sunday at noon!!!DEMING::WESTWed Apr 21 1993 17:2812
    
    My opinion is that the PATS would take Bledsloe except for the fact
    that his agent is asking for a 4 year deal in the area of 17+ million.
    This is chasing the Pats away, also Mirers' agent wants a 4 year deal 
    worth about 15 million....The Pats want something in this draft not 
    a big ?? on if they can sign someone....there has been talk that they 
    could get 4-6 quality players and fill in where they need for the same
    amount of money. Take the draft picks and maybe deal a Mullen and the
    18th pick to someone and move up in the draft.....
    
    /kevin
    
56.200FDCV06::KINGJessinator attacks Disney, film @11Wed Apr 21 1993 18:013
    Hey Karen.... What happened at bowling lasted night?  :-}
    
    REK
56.201DECWET::METZGERImagine your logo here.Wed Apr 21 1993 22:2917
The pats should trade down to the number 4 or 5 slot and grab some huge
offensive lineman. It appears that Parcell's can get by wiht a mediocre QB in
his system and as evidenced by the latest free agent signings teams are placing
a priority on offensive lineman to build teams around.

Dropping below 10 in this years draft is another way to insure the continued 
mediocrity of the Pats by filling holes w/ mediocre crap shoot players instead
of getting some cajones and drafting an impact player for a change.

By dropping to a #4 or 5 slot then can weasel somebodies 2nd round pick to 
continue the mediocre stocking of warm bodies....

Either way the 'Hawks will stay at #2 and pick whomever of Bledsoe or Mirer
is left (they prefer Bledsoe for aarm strength and local boy story)

Metz
56.202NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Apr 22 1993 16:5813
> Either way the 'Hawks will stay at #2 and pick whomever of Bledsoe or Mirer
> is left (they prefer Bledsoe for aarm strength and local boy story)
    
    If the Patriots are going to trade down (and that looks more and more
    like what's going to happen) the very first thing they should do is
    tell the Seahawks that they're taking Bledsoe and then extort a player 
    or a 3rd-round pick not to do so.  Then they can trade the #2 to one of
    the teams clamoring for Mirer or Hearst.  Basically, there should be a
    fee for the mediator who's making sure everybody gets what they want...
    
    glenn
    
56.204DECWET::METZGERImagine your logo here.Thu Apr 22 1993 20:1411
Nor does Seattle. They won't give up anything to move up 1 spot in the
draft. Especially a 3rd round pick. Remember they have close to as many holes
to fill as the Pats do (mostly on offense) and Flores intends to built an O-line
through the draft...

The Pats shouldn't trade down any lower than #4 or 5 in the first round. Any
lower than that an they don't get an impact player. And they desperatly need
an impact defensive or offensive lineman....

Metz
56.205NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Apr 22 1993 20:528
    
    Sure, Metz, but what will you be saying come Monday if Parcells is just
    bluffing about trading down (or doesn't get the right offer) and goes
    ahead and picks Bledsoe, and Seattle is left with your fave Mirer?  I
    know I'll be happy... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
56.206DECWET::METZGERImagine your logo here.Thu Apr 22 1993 21:0017
I'll be pissed as all hell and I'll be ranting and raving about how Mirer is
a stiff and he'll be another Kelley Stouffer and the Qb equivalent of Bosworth
and they shouldda asked for Krieg back from the Chiefs and drafted Jones 
instead of that stiff Mirer. :-)

But I have a feeling that Parcells has made his mind to either trade the pick
or to draft mirer...My guess is that he'll trade the pick..I just hope he drafts
better than the Agnew/Singleton type player.

Heck he's got 5 Qb's all ready. WWWwwhat's he need with another one?

Bledsoe to Martin....Touchdown !

Metz

 
56.207AXIS::ROBICHAUDComeToMiami-AndGiveUsYourMoney!Fri Apr 23 1993 15:2710
	Hey Tommy Brydie, this week's S.I. has an article about our 
studmeister linebacker from Florida State.  Guess he impressed all the 
voyeur scouts with his bench press, vertical leap and all the other stuff 
that doesn't measure if the guy can actually play football.  S.I.'s DoctorZ 
(who knows as much about football as Al Bundy does about satisfying a woman) 
has Jones going to the Jesters with the third pick.  Sure hope that Mirer 
doesn't turn about to be John Huarte, but if past Patriot history is any 
indication...

				/Don
56.208First Round of the draft....SNAX::ERICKSONThe snow has melted, time to tee off!Mon Apr 26 1993 00:0043
    
    	Here is what I have for the first round. I think Parsalls had
    everybody confused, but made the right choice.
    
    Pats           - Drew Bledsoe QB Washington St.
    Seahawks       - Rick Mirer QB Notre Dame
    Phoenix*       - Garrison Hearst RB Georgia - Swapped with Jets, plus
                     gave up Johny Johnson RB to the Jets.
    Jets           - Marvin Jones LB Florida St.
    Bengals        - Eric Curry DL Alabama
    Tampa Bay      - William Roaf OL NE Louisiana
    Bears          - Curtis Conway WR USC
    Saints*        - John Copeland DL Alabama - Traded LB Pat Swilling to
                     Lions for the 8th pick
    Atlanta        - Lincoln Kennedy OL Washington
    Rams           - Jerome Bettis FB Notre Dame
    Denver*        - Dan Williams DL Toledo - Swapped 14th pick plus with
                     Cleveland
    Raiders        - Patrick Bates DB Texas A&M
    Houston*       - Brad Hopkins OL Illinois - Swapped 19th pick plus with
                     Philadelphia
    Cleveland      - Steve Everit C Michigan
    Green Bay      - Wayne Simmons LB Clemson
    Colts          - Sean Dawkins WR California
    Washington     - Tom Carter DB Notre Dame
    Phoenix*       - Ernest Dye OL South Carolina - Swapped 20th pick plus
                     with 49'ers
    Eagles         - Lester Holmes OL Jackson St.
    Saints*        - Irv Smith TE Notre Dame - Swapped 26th pick plus
                     with 49'ers
    Minnesota      - Robert Smith  RB Ohio St.
    San Diego      - Darien Gordon  CB Stanford
    Pittsburgh     - Deon Figures DB Colorado
    Philadelphia   - Leonard Renfro  DT Colorodo
    Miami          - O.J. McDuffie WR Penn St.
    San Francisco  - Dana Stubblefield DL  Kansas
    San Francisco  - Todd Kelly DL
    Buffalo        - Thomas Smith DB North Carolina
    Green Bay*     - George Teague           - Traded picks to Dallas
    
    
    
    /Ron
56.209ACESMK::FRANCUSABPMon Apr 26 1993 05:044
    also a good move by the Jets
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.211Quick send some Lacquer to GroundChuck!!CNTROL::CHILDSThe idea that nothing matters...Mon Apr 26 1993 11:240
56.212TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is crawling!!!Mon Apr 26 1993 13:267
re:Jets

Don't know much about Johnny Jones, but it seems to me that Phoenix got took.
All the talk I heard was that the Jets wanted Marvin Jones anyway, so the 
Cards gave up a player for nothing.

=Bob=
56.213Drew da main!NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Apr 26 1993 13:581
    
56.214woops, should be re: .212 - feel better Tommy?METSNY::francusABPMon Apr 26 1993 14:2112
re: .214

The Cardinals had the problem that the Jets were talking to other teams
that were likely to take Hearst with the 3rd pick. So Phoenix gave up
a RB, and got into position to take the RB they wanted. 

This is similar to a suggestion made in this notesfile about what the Pats
could have done with Seattle if the Pats were going to take Mirer. Good
move in taking Bledsoe.

The Crazy Met
56.215QUASER::JACKSONTAIf you see KayMon Apr 26 1993 15:123
      I thought the Pats already had 4-6 QB's?  Trades coming?
    
    t Tim
56.217AXIS::ROBICHAUDMon Apr 26 1993 16:488
    	The Jests must've been trying to sell the "we're taking Hearst
    or trading the pick to someone who will" bait and Phoenix took it
    hook, line and sinker.  Jesters still get their man and a running
    back to boot.  You got to love ESPN's DraftCam.  Nothing like seeing
    a bunch of executives in suits and ties using the telephone to really
    bring home the total "draft experience" to the audience.
    
    				/Don
56.218Hey Glen..I'm angry...DECWET::METZGERImagine your logo here.Mon Apr 26 1993 18:1235
The Seachokes are putting a good face on about not getting Bledsoe. They make
no bones about the fact that would have prefered Bledsoe but are content in
getting Mirer. 

Personally I'm bummed because I think that Bledsoe is a QB that will do things
on the field that have yet to be done. He's a true franchise Qb that , if given 
the chance, will do spectacular things. I don't think that Parcells offensive
scheme that he used on the Giants will let him showcase his ability at all.
Having a Bledsoe throw 20 times a game is a major waste of talent. It's like
putting a Marino on the bears. I suspect that in 3-4 years either Parcells will
have to open up his game plan a little more or Bledsoe won't be a happy camper.

Mirer, on the other hand would have been content to throw 25 times a game as
long as the team was winning. I think the Seahquacks will throw him into the
fire this season and ask him to throw a ton downfield. His college stats 
seem to indicate that he's abetter qb when he throws less. The Seachokes are
saying that he will compete with dan McGwire for the starting qb slot but if he
can't beat out Dan "rooted to the ground like an oak" McGwire than Mirer was
a wasted pick. Hopefully Flores will tailor the offense around Mirer's 
strengths and design a lot of rollout and short pass plays to John L. and 
Blades and Martin. Asking him to sit in the sievelike Seattle pocket and throw
downfield is a sure ticket to an injured QB by game 4.

All in all I'd say the NE got a true franchise QB but the hawks did O.K. by
meeting a need in drafting Mirer. I would have been happier if they had filled
the QB need through free agency (Burlein) and drafted Marvin Jones instead but
they needed a QB and they got one. 

Did Toretta get drafted? I know that Billy Joe Hobert went to the faiders and
Brunell went somewhere today...

Metz


56.219METSNY::francusABPMon Apr 26 1993 18:1611
Bob Griese was a QB who did just fine throwing 20 times a game. He
probably could have done a lot more if the game plane had him throwing
35 times a game. If New England wins I'm not sure anyone, including
Bledsoe, will complain. If they are losing everyone will complain about
everything.

That being saidI can see Bledsoe being a franchise type player, much harder
to see Mirer being that kind of QB.

The Crazy Met
56.220CAMONE::WAYI'd have had to miss the danceMon Apr 26 1993 19:1815
>Having a Bledsoe throw 20 times a game is a major waste of talent. It's like
>putting a Marino on the bears. I suspect that in 3-4 years either Parcells will
>have to open up his game plan a little more or Bledsoe won't be a happy camper.

A lot of Parcells game plan with the Giants was dictated by the fact that
a lot of their season is played outdoors in the cold.  A good solid
running game, with high percentage passes thrown in when needed will
be the way to go.

However, if the Pats end up with a new stadium, with a dome, then I'd
bet Parcells opens it up a little more.

'Saw


56.223Cruel man Cruel!!!! ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSThe idea that nothing matters...Mon Apr 26 1993 19:3713
>    Never mind the fact that Parcells simply never had a QB with Bledsoe's
>    supposed talent. Can't fire a weapon you don't have. 

	Simms is loaded with talent Tommy, it's the receivers that we're
 and still are suspect for the Giants. When a Bavaro leads you're team in
 receiving your wide receivers aren't gettin the job done.....JAYYYDEEEE
 has the numbers not me but Simms has HOF numbers and has played on a
 running team....

 mike
    

56.224Attitude problem! Looks like the Pats got the right guy ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Apr 26 1993 19:418
              
    Saw a quote from Rick Mirer in today's paper that he really wasn't all
    that thrilled with the East Coast anyway.  Another Elway!  Tell it to
    all those eastern real and subway ND alums who wanted to see you in
    Foxborough, Rick...
    
    glenn
    
56.225DECWET::METZGERImagine your logo here.Mon Apr 26 1993 19:4310
Do you really think Parcells will open up his offense?

I think he'll stick with what has brought him success....A huge O-line, some
good rb's that don't fumble and an excellent defense...

The problem is that the Pat's currently have none of the above...


Metz
56.227CAMONE::WAYI'd have had to miss the danceMon Apr 26 1993 20:2226
The mark of a good coach is to work with the talent you have.


If you want my HONEST opinion, the Broncos had a wide-open, devil-may-care
offense in 1986.  The Gaints made Pat Roberston looked like an ultra-left-wing
liberal with their offense.

The Giants won the Super Bowl and their first Champeenship in 30 
years.   Was I complaining about their conservative offense?  Was I?

Not on your life.


I'd posit that not one of you Pats fans would utter one peep of complaint
if Bill could bring the Lombardi trophy home to Foxboro, if he ran 85%
of the time, and only threw to the TE and RB the rest of the time.....


8^)


'Saw


PS  I have a GREAT poster of the Patriettes that'll soon be up on 
    my office wall.....
56.228NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Apr 26 1993 20:3012
             
    A great QB can be great in any NFL offense these days.  Don't confuse
    quantity (stats) with quality in the context of the chosen offensive
    scheme.  *No* team can just almost exclusively run the ball and win.  
    *Every* team needs a QB who can make big plays.  There will be plenty
    of opportunity in the future (not this year) for Mr. Bledsoe to make a 
    winning impact, even if he's only throwing just 20 times/game in bad
    weather conditions (the other QB has to perform and perform well in 
    that bad weather, too, even if both suffer statistically).  
    
    glenn
     
56.229SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindTue Apr 27 1993 10:453
    Ha ha, love your comment about Perkins and his hair, Tommie!  :*)
    
    Lee
56.230PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Apr 27 1993 19:2012
    QB Hugh Millen was traded to Dallas for an undisclosed 1994 draftpick.
    
    The biggest problem with the Pats' O-line is their age.  They are all
    young and all thrown into the fray at about the same time.  As they
    mature you'll see them get better.  And as Tommy said, the Pats have
    quality RBs (as displayed by their ability to trade away Stephens) and
    a decent defense.
    
    Times are changing.  Free agency allows teams to aquire veteran talent
    for the short term and use the draft for the long term.  At least
    that's the theory.  Let's see how long it takes the Foxborough Faithful
    to boo Secules off the field in favor of Bledsoe.
56.231MKFSA::LONGIf you get there before I doTue Apr 27 1993 19:368
	Just out of curiosity, what do yunz think the order of play will
	be for the Pat's qb?
	
	My guess to start the season: Zolak, Secules then Bledsoe.


	billl
56.232Aikman money??METSNY::francusABPTue Apr 27 1993 19:405
With the new salary cap in effect for rookies how will Bledsoes
contract be structured??

The Crazy Met
56.233probably not too shabby.....CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Apr 27 1993 20:0310
    
    Yabbut my $0.02 says Bledsoe's gonna get a total package of someplace
    between $17M-$20M for 4 years.
    
    Anybody else care to speculate?
    
    I remain,
    thinking that's about the right range
    Kev
    
56.234QUASER::JACKSONTAIf you see KayTue Apr 27 1993 20:073
        I thought that rookies can't go over 2 mil a year?.?.?
    
      Tim
56.235METSNY::francusABPTue Apr 27 1993 20:117
Right. No team can spend more than 2 million per year TOTAL on rookies,
hence the question of how a contract will be structured. They presumably
can structure it so it is 1 million for Bledsoe's first year, and then
much larger sums for the other years.

The Crazy Met
56.236Steinberg v. Parcells could really set off some sparksNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Apr 27 1993 20:5014
    
> Right. No team can spend more than 2 million per year TOTAL on rookies,
> hence the question of how a contract will be structured.
    
    Actually the rookie cap is supposed to be on a graded scale, with the
    teams drafting at the top allowed more money.  The current basis 
    reflects the contracts offered after the last draft, roughly
    maintaining the status quo but putting an end to the massive inflation
    that has occurred with draft picks.  Whether or not this will be
    acceptable to Mr. Bledsoe remains to be seen.  All I can say is, beware
    Dick Steinberg, the roughest, toughest hombre agent in the land...
    
    glenn
     
56.237SOLANA::MAY_BRInside Intel, but no Intel insideTue Apr 27 1993 21:154
    Are there any provisions for teams that have more 1st round draft
    picks?  This could hurt a team that astockpiles picks.
    
    brews
56.238NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Apr 27 1993 21:329
    
    > Are there any provisions for teams that have more 1st round draft
    > picks?  This could hurt a team that astockpiles picks.
    
    I think the pay scale depends on the actual picks you have, not some
    pre-fixed amount...
    
    glenn
    
56.239ROYALT::ASHEDet. Teamsters:92-93 DEChoop champsWed Apr 28 1993 16:466
    Depends on number of picks, and where they are.  Bledsoe would get more
    than say Deon Figures.
    
    Gino got drafted in the 7th round by Minnesota.  Around the same time
    as pre-season Heismann candidate, Elvis Grbac.
    
56.240AXIS::ROBICHAUDWed Apr 28 1993 20:374
    	Patriot's draft?  It costs too much ($3.75 for a 12 oz. cup)
    and it's usually warm.
    
    				/Don
56.241PFSVAX::JACOBMy minds just not in itThu Apr 29 1993 01:4410
    
    >>	Patriot's draft?  It costs too much ($3.75 for a 12 oz. cup)
    >>and it's usually warm.
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    At least it cools down in the pipes on the way from the urinals in the
    men's room.
    
    JaKe
    
56.242GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementFri Jun 18 1993 16:286
    No comment on this morning's stabbing of Leonard Russell and Tim
    Edwards?  Any update's on Russell's condition?  Edwards was released ad
    Russell (per WBZ this AM) was in serious condition in Intensive Care at
    Mass General.
    
    Mark.
56.243USCTR1::KINGKey West, where the fun begins.......Fri Jun 18 1993 16:353
    At noon they hade Russell still in serious condition...
    
    Rick
56.244ROYALT::ASHEI can't tell you why...Fri Jun 18 1993 16:502
    What's there to comment about?
    
56.245CTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyFri Jun 18 1993 16:575
    
    Heard something on the radio this AM about it. Wha' happened?
    
    MikeL
    
56.246PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jun 18 1993 17:004
56.247ROYALT::ASHEI can't tell you why...Fri Jun 18 1993 17:284
    They were talking to some women outside the Harbor Club when some guys
    looked to start a discussion.  Words were exchanged and Russell was
    allegedly stabbed by one of the two suspects.   The other was stabbed
    trying to break up the fight.
56.248PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 30 1993 13:293
    I see Lowell Weiker wants to put all of those income tax dollars to
    work.  He is supposed to meet with Fran Murray, former minority owner
    of the Pats, today to discuss a domed stadium in the Hartford area.
56.249CAMONE::WAYI got a stiffieWed Jun 30 1993 13:3520
>    I see Lowell Weiker wants to put all of those income tax dollars to
>    work.  He is supposed to meet with Fran Murray, former minority owner
>    of the Pats, today to discuss a domed stadium in the Hartford area.

See the NFL note.

There is supposed to be a news conference today with an announcement.

The one thing I know about ol' Lowell is that he doesn't even take a dump
without having a plan, and there's got to have been a lot of groundwork
done on this.

It'll be interesting to see what's what.


'Saw


PS  If it's true, watch for our income tax rate to JUMP way up. 8^(

56.251PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 30 1993 13:5110
    Worcester to Hartford is about 45-60 minutes, about the same as going
    to Foxborough.  Moving to Hartford put it closer to the second or 3rd
    largest city in New England -- Springfield.  If they don't think about
    highway acess when locating the stadium, the traffic could be worse
    than Route 1.  Hartford is a pain to get through as it is.  The 91/84
    interchange is a nightmare as it is now.
    
    I think they are getting a little too close to Giants territory if they
    move it there, though.  Besides, it will cost the Pats a fortune to
    break their current lease.
56.252ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Wed Jun 30 1993 13:557
    Boston-Hartford is about 90 minutes - going 70MPH on the Pike; if
    stadium traffic needs to be included it would mean at least 2 hours
    from Boston. Quite a way to go. I mean this is the Pats we're talkinmg
    about not a Bruce Springsteen concert.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.253CAMONE::WAYI got a stiffieWed Jun 30 1993 14:0522
84/91 is improving.

As it is right now it's 100% better than it was, but it's still under
construction.

I don't believe Weicker is tilting at windmills, if only for the fact that
he doesn't usually work that way.  Don't get me wrong -- I hate the guy,
but he doesn't do stuff without lots of groundwork in place.  I believe he's
serious about making a serious bid for the Pats.  Whether or not he gets
it, is another thing


If they put it east of the river, then access becomes less of a problem
because that area is not as congested, and you don't hit the 84/91 interchange.

As to Giants territory, the Hartford area is pretty much split.  I'll watch
the Pats if nothing else is going on, but I am a Giants fan.


It'll be interesting to see what the man has up his sleeve.

'Saw
56.254PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 30 1993 14:098
56.255NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jun 30 1993 14:147
    
    I also don't see Hartford supporting anything less than a solid,
    winning, suuitable-for-bandwagon-jumping Patriots' football team.  
    So where's the payoff?
    
    glenn
    
56.256CAMONE::WAYI got a stiffieWed Jun 30 1993 14:4941
84/91 has always been under construction, true, but they have recently (last
two years) totally revamped about 3/4 of the interchange.  It's way better
than what was there before.  


>    
>    I also don't see Hartford supporting anything less than a solid,
>    winning, suuitable-for-bandwagon-jumping Patriots' football team.  
>    So where's the payoff?
>    

Want my cut at it?

Due to an intense lobbying effort, along with buy-in from the Mashintucket(sp)
Indian tribe, Weicker defeated the proposed Casino plan -- THIS year.
The casino folks will be back in record numbers next year to try and push
casino gambling in Hartford/Bridgeport through again.

In effect, what Weicker did was say no to about 22K direct and indirect
jobs from those casinos.

My thinking is that this is his clincher to kill off the casino gambling
question for next year.

If he can get buy-in, approval whatever, to build a domed stadium, then
he's got all sorts of possibilities for sports, including wooing the
Pawsox away from Pawtucket, the Patriots possibility, UCONN playing
Division I football etc etc etc.   (A few years ago, the Red Sox were thinking
of switching their AAA and AA ball clubs because of fan response in this
area -- I don't know if it is still the case.)

It creates jobs -- direct and indirect, and when the question of the casino
comes up again, he's in a much better position to defeat it.   


That's just me trying to get inside his head.  I could be completely wrong.


'saw
    

56.257Murray made Orthwein an offerPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 30 1993 15:1618
Subject: Ever unstable Patriots on the move?
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 93 21:25:47 PDT
 
	HARTFORD, Conn. (UPI) -- Fran Murray, former part-owner of the New
England Patriots, Tuesday made an offer to buy the troubled franchise
and said he would keep the team in New England but wouldn't commit to
Massachusetts.
	Murray's offer to current owner James Orthwein -- who intends to bring
NFL football back to St. Louis with an expansion team -- was made on the
eve of a news conference Murray is scheduled to hold 10 a.m. EDT
Wednesday in Hartford with Connecticut Gov. Lowell Weicker. Weicker will
apparently announce plans to build a major sports complex for the
Patriots. 
	Murray has been trying for some time to develop a major sports and
convention complex in the Boston area for the Patriots, who play in
Foxboro. Orthwein has repeatedly stated his intention to eventually sell
the Patriots and buy into an expansion team in St. Louis.
    
56.259No offense 'Saw, but screw Ct.CTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyWed Jun 30 1993 16:1013
    Putting aside the bidness aspect...
    
    How many Ct people are Pats fans?? I dunno, I heard it's no more than 
    20%( much less than the 50% deemed to be BoSox fans).
    
    So this move would alienate 80% of their fan base ( EMASS, some of
    CMASS, RI, NH) in order to attract WMass, Vt and some Ct fans?
    
    If the Pats move to Ct., sorry, but my ass roots for someone else
    (Jints?)
    
    MikeL
    
56.260VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDImus is coming to BostonWed Jun 30 1993 16:209
    	CT are fains of who is winning.  The last year the Giants won the
    Super Bowl every car with a CT license plate had folks in there wearing 
    brand new Giants apparel.  Last year there were tons of Miami CT fans 
    wearing brand new Dolphin apparel at Foxboro.  Hey 'Saw I would've
    never supported a dime of my tax money going to the Patriots, but since
    it's *your* tax dollars, what the hell.  FWIW, Denny, Chap and I would
    still go to the games as long as there is tailgating.
    
    				/Don
56.261PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 30 1993 16:246
56.262PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 30 1993 16:2711
56.263The Hartford Traitors 8^)CTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyWed Jun 30 1993 16:3917
    -1
    
    Yabbut Mac, IMO they would alienate a majority of their fans from
    Woostah ( well Framingham ) in. Don't you think the majority of
    season tix holders and frequent attendees are from east of Woostah?
    
    
    Sorry, but the Pats would be thumbing their nose at a vast % of their
    supporters if they went to Haarfa. I'd just do the same to them.
    Hey it's pro football, it's not like it's religion like college
    football!  I dunno, again apologies to 'Saw, but I just don't
    consider Ct. as an integral part of NE. Kinda like a crossroads.
    
    
    
    MikeL
    
56.264DECWET::METZGERThis is the song that never ends.Wed Jun 30 1993 17:1915
The only group I think they would lose would be the southern N.H contingent.
If they located the stadium on the east side of the river about 20 mins east
of haarfaa then the drive from boston wouldn't be bad at all. If they
designed a stadium with easy in and out access then the round trip time would
probably be faster than foxboro.

Haarfaa would clean up on speeding tickets down 84 as well.

Of course the Pats would have to change their name to the Fighting Insurance
Salesmen and their newly designed logo would have to be changed to a guy in 
a 3 piece suit carrying a briefcase leaping over a dog with pen in hand
trying the sell another policy.

Metz
56.265PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 30 1993 19:023
    Pats move to Haafaad??
    
    Party at the Sawmill!!
56.266Will Be intresting, but why a Dome, Just a Bigger Nicer StadiumMR1PST::THEKGB::MBROOKSWed Jun 30 1993 19:048
    I guess if they look at the past 3-5 years attendences they can risk
    moving to CT ?  How many seats would be empty in this dome :-),
    if its too big the pats may never see a sell out.  Of course if they
    get a good deal on playing in this dome maybe they can afford to pay
    there players more $$$ and produce a winning team :-) ya buy a
    contender that's the ticket :-)
    
    							MaB
56.268PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 30 1993 19:5811
56.269NFL blackout rule is not federal law...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jun 30 1993 20:0516
56.270must be that migration to parts elsewhere...DECWET::METZGERThis is the song that never ends.Wed Jun 30 1993 20:136
I thought you people thought that Boston was the hub of the universe?

I'm amazed that it's fallen to just the hub of New England...

 Metz
56.272RUGBY1::wayI got a stiffieWed Jun 30 1993 20:5327
The Connecticut rap as a "crossroads" is ill-deserved and shows
a major lack of knowledge of New England history as well as a superficial
look at what CT really is.

I've lived here all my life and I can you you sites with as much historical
impact and importance as any place in the rest of New England.  The rap
as a crossroads comes mainly from two things:  a) proximity to New York and
the abundance of folks in Greenwich County who work in New York, and b)
Hartford as an insurance center.

But do a little digging, go down to Chester and ride the ferry, go to
South Glastonbury or any part of Old Wethersfield and I'll show you as much
history and "New England" as anywhere east of 495.

I get tired of hearing that rap, because I come from old New England stock, 
and not the yuppified, suit-wearing, beemer driving weinerheads who work
in Hartford.  My father's side of the family can trace his roots back past
1700 in this area.


Personally, from a CT point of view I think it's great that they're trying
to go after the Patriots.  I don't think they'll get them, and I think that
some of the reasons for trying are what I put in earlier, but you can't fault
them for trying.....


'SAw
56.273ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Wed Jun 30 1993 20:564
    So Hartford will have 2 teams renowned for their losing ways.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.274Why I hate Connecticut, by ACC ChrisRHETT::KNORRDean &gt; WoodenWed Jun 30 1993 21:1217
    Top 10 Things John Q. Public Knows About Connecticut
    ====================================================
    
    1.  I-95
    2.  Traffic jams on I-95
    3.  Toll booths on I-95
    4.  The bridge that collapsed on I-95
    5.  The truck driver who barreled thru the toll booth on I-95
    6.  Can't use my radar detector on I-95
    7.  Outrageously high speeding fines on I-95
    8.  Perpectual road construction on I-95
    9.  Car needs an alignment after driving on I-95
    10. No matter how slow that trucker's goin' cain't pass on the right
        on I-95
    
    
    - ACC Chris
56.275CAMONE::WAYI got a stiffieWed Jun 30 1993 21:2817
>    Top 10 Things John Q. Public Knows About 1% of Connecticut
>    ==========================================================


Anyone who lives in CT knows to avoid I95 like the plague.  Unless you
wanna rub elbows with folks from Greenwich county.


Folks who've been to the Sawmill have seen some of the pretty areas
of CT.   I'd take a small plot of land over a mansion in Fairfield County
anyday.


PS  Earlier I referred to it as "Greenwich County".  By rights it's 
    Fairfield County, but a lot of us refer to it by the name of the
    town our Fat Fascist Governor is from.....
    
56.276(8^)PFSVAX::JACOBGeez, the METS sure do STINK!!Wed Jun 30 1993 21:3615
    
    >> New England IS the universe. Ya dad-gummed furriner.
    
    Ya fergot how it REALLY goes, Tommy.
    
    Here's how it should be:
    
    New England IS the BUTT of the universe.   And, Boston is the
    sphincter.
    
    
    Schnorttt SChittt Schleppps
    
    JaKe
    
56.277QUASER::JACKSONTATo walk the caves of iceWed Jun 30 1993 22:273
      Domes are fur sissies!
    
      Tim
56.278ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Wed Jun 30 1993 23:326
    re: .274
    
    btw law changed and you can use a radar detector in CT.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.279CTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyThu Jul 01 1993 01:3826
    'Saw,
    As I said, my apologies regarding the "crossroads" thang, as it is
    based on perception and ignorance on Ct. history, but it would be a
    travesty, IMO, if the Pats moved to Ct and tried to pass it off as
    NE Pats, no matter what Mac says. OK, so I'll accede to you and
    intellectually say that Ct is NE, but emotionally I won't. FWIW,\
    the perception is out there because of the reasons you state, 'Saw,
    that CT is half and half ( dat's admittedly provincial Boston area
    bias) and I cain't accept a NE Pats team in Ct. Hartford whatever but
    not NE Pats. 'Saw, you sum up what most people percieve about Ct;
    50/50 Bosox/Yank fans, majority Jint fans; quasi-NE/quasi-NY, history
    notwithstanding.
    
    And as Tommy said Mac, Boston is the Hub and media center of NE, not
    Hartford, Woostah, Springfield etc. It that's provincial, so be it.
    Ya thinn NooYawkas would be pleased to see the Yanks move to Ithaca
    cuz it's mo' "New York"?.
    
    So 'Saw, nothing against CT in this endeavor, it's the Pats who would
    be
    the ogre in this matter if they move. And likle Tommy, I don't think
    they'll venture 30 miles outside Beantown if/when they move.
    
    MikeL
    
    
56.280VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDImus is coming to BostonThu Jul 01 1993 11:325
56.281CAM3::WAYI got a stiffieThu Jul 01 1993 11:4243
>    btw law changed and you can use a radar detector in CT.
    
Actually, you always could.  8^)


That law was only enforced on a spotty basis, and there were lots of
ways around it, if caught with one.   

The one and only time I got nabbed it cost me $40, and when the trooper
said to me "It's illegal to have these you know, and it's gonna cost
you $40" I replied  "First off, the constitutionality of the illegality of 
owning and operating a device to receive radio signals is open to question.
Second off, I figure this baby has easily saved me $1500 worth of tickets,
so I'm still $1100 ahead of the game".

I thought he was gonna blow a gasket.



re Mike:

I hear what you're saying, but it still rankles me that folks just
trash the area without having checked it out.   Actually, the split
of Yankee/Sox fans in the area has always made things really interesting,
and sparked many a coffee-shop or pub debate.   And most "Connecticut"
folks, don't believe that Fairfield County is part of Connecticut, no
matter what the map says....8^)


re /Don:

I didn't see the press conference.  I was in this dump until 7:30.

The reaction around here is "Where can I sign up for season tickets".


The only thing I see bad about it might be that Giants telecasts might be
affected....


'Saw
    

56.282VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDImus is coming to BostonThu Jul 01 1993 11:457
    	Hey 'Saw, hold off on the season tickets.  Murray will pay 133
    million for the team, but can't say where the money is coming from and
    the only thing solid about the stadium is the cardboard that the
    picture of it is on.  The Boston media is having a field day with this
    one.
    
    				/Don
56.283ROYALT::ASHESTOP! You're bendin' the shafts!!!Thu Jul 01 1993 12:094
    So you can use a detector in CT now?
    
    Is the stadium going to be near the mall with the fake ATM?
    
56.284CAMONE::WAYI got a stiffieThu Jul 01 1993 12:1624
re /Don:

	Well, I wouldn't expect the Boston media to be sitting around
	with the thumbs up their arses.  Of course they're having a
	field day.  But stranger things have happened, and it sure will
	be interesting to see what kind of spin control they use if the
	Pats DO move.


>    So you can use a detector in CT now?

Yep, have been able to legally since last October, but seriously, I've
always used one.
    
>    Is the stadium going to be near the mall with the fake ATM?

Not from what they're talking about.  They're looking at site
in Colt Park or near Brainard airport (not Bradley, Brainard on the
southeast side of Harfaa)


'Saw
    

56.285ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Thu Jul 01 1993 13:045
    I always used a radaar detector in CT as well; got caught speeding
    once but managed to hide the detector before the cop came over.
    
    The crazy Met
    
56.286Truth be told I'd rather spend the day in MaineNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 01 1993 13:1612
    While this New England cultural discussion is all very interesting, the
    fact of the matter is that football has never been a big part of the
    New England cultural landscape anyway.  I still think it'd be dumb to
    base the region's football team in Hartford, for logistical reasons.
    Connecticut may be every bit as much New England as Maine, but I
    wouldn't want to see the Patriots based out of Portland, either.  And 
    for most people living north of Boston as opposed to south it'd be no
    less convenient.
    
    glenn
    
56.287exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Jul 01 1993 13:3710
    >> the fact of the matter is that football has never been a big 
    >> part of the New England cultural landscape anyway.  
    
      Tell that to the thousands who bought season tickets after Parcells
      was announced as the new head coach. A successful NFL franchise will
      sell just about anywhere but to really cash in on all of the peripheral
      goodies the team *has* to be located in Boston.
    
      BTW - 'Saw, Georgia has a rich colonial history and it ain't New
            England either.
56.288"Can you imagine Jim Nance in a Hartford uniform?" doesn't compareNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 01 1993 13:4217
    >> the fact of the matter is that football has never been a big 
    >> part of the New England cultural landscape anyway.  
    >
    >  Tell that to the thousands who bought season tickets after Parcells
    >  was announced as the new head coach. A successful NFL franchise will
    >  sell just about anywhere but to really cash in on all of the peripheral
    >  goodies the team *has* to be located in Boston.
    
    Oh, I agree.  For financial reasons especially it'd be best if in the
    team is in the region's largest city.  All I was saying is that I don't
    think the Patriots in Connecticut would be the cultural travesty
    that a Nashua NH Red Sox would be.  Or a Providence RI Celtics.  Hell,
    having Foxborough for an identity is bad enough...
    
    glenn
    
56.290RUGBY1::wayI got a stiffieThu Jul 01 1993 13:5815
Tommy,

Perhaps I didn't express myself as clearly as I would have liked.

I'm not saying that Colonial history makes it New England, but I'm talking
about that for a start.   There are very definite things in Connecticut
that ARE New England in addition to a colonial history.   The farms, the
people and their traditions.

Granted, I'll give you Fairfield County (you can have it 8^)) isn't New England,
but the rest of the state is, from the Northwest corner to the Southeast
shore (excluding Fairfield County).....


'Saw
56.291WREATH::DEVLINAgassi - the Hairless wonder...Thu Jul 01 1993 14:135
No more toll booths on I-95 right?   Radar detectors?  Just drive around the speed
limit and you don't need one.  Never have gotten a speeding ticket in CT.  Radar
Dectectors are for weinies.

JD
56.293RUGBY1::wayI got a stiffieThu Jul 01 1993 14:468
I drive around 70, which is what everyone else is driving...

Right, no tolls on I95 in CT, no tolls anywhere in CT any more.  It took
a couple of major 18-wheeler-crushes-car-with-young-mother-and-baby type
accidents, but they finally got rid of them....


'Saw
56.294RUGBY1::wayI got a stiffieThu Jul 01 1993 14:4917
Okay, Tommy.

Anyway, you should come down some weekend and check out the Mark Twain
and Harriet Beecher Stowe houses in Hartford, along with the Wadsworth
Atheneum.

Old Newgate Prison is a rush too -- all underground (from colonial times)
and some of the passages off the tour route are clearly marked "pass at your
own risk".  

Gillette Castle, built by the late 19th, early 20th century actor,
William Gillette is also fun, especially at Christmas time, when it's done
up a la Victorian Christmas...


your CT tour guide,
'Saw
56.296Insert youknowwhatCTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyThu Jul 01 1993 15:565
    HAHAHA
    This from someone from Clinton??
    
    MikeL
    
56.298CTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyThu Jul 01 1993 16:1225
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 56.297         The Unofficial New England Patriots Note          297 of 297
MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!"             5 lines   1-JUL-1993 12:02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>  I'll have you know, Leary that Clinton is the cultural and political 
>>  center of the quad-town area (Clinton, Sterling, Lancaster and Bolton).
 
    Now there's a downright scary development. Don't tell me... you're
    chairman of "The Quad-town Apple-picking festival" and guru of the
    "County grass growing fest"
    
    And Heiser left this beacon of renaissance for staid Arizona
    
    
>>     If you weren't so busy writing checks to Notre Dame football players
>>     you'd know that.
    
    Checks aren't allowed. Cash in big brown bags preferred. No smoking
    guns you see....
    
    MikeL
    
56.299VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHappy 30th ZIPThu Jul 01 1993 16:418
    	Hey Tommy if they Pats move into a sissified domed MegaHypePlex
    near the waterfront they can take my season tickets and stick 'em where
    the sun don't shine.  It would be faster getting in and out of Hartford
    than going through Boston every Sunday.  And if the developers get
    their way the stadium will be smack dab in the middle of a mall meaning
    no more tailgating.  8^(
    
    				/Don
56.301VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDImus is coming to BostonWed Jul 07 1993 16:4710
	The New England (MegaPlex) Patriots signed Drew Bledsoe to a six 
year (MegaPlex) 14.5 million dollar contract.  The only thing that could be 
better (MegaPlex) was if those evil Massachusetts politicians would allow 
the new (MegaPlex) stadium to be built.  The Patriots will never be a 
competitive (MegaPlex) team until they have a brand new (MegaPlex) domed 
stadium, completely paid for by the state (MegaPlex).  Lord knows that Mr. 
Orthwein (MegaPlex) is doing everything in his power (MegaPlex) to bring 
the fans of New England (MegaPlex) a winner.

				/Don
56.302Subliminal advertising at its best!TNPUBS::NAZZAROTake me for a little whileThu Jul 08 1993 13:596
    Thanks for the note about Bledsoe (MegaPlex), /Don.  I didn't get the
    (MegaPlex) message Orthwein was trying to get across at the press
    conference (MegaPlex) to announce Bledsoe's signing.  Thanks for
    (MegaPlex) clarifying it for me.
    
    NAZZ
56.303PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 08 1993 14:027
56.304and the funniest comedians around...CNTROL::CHILDSLefty &gt; Dean Thu Jul 08 1993 14:177
 but Mac you know how those TV exe's are. They just can't get enough of
 Eddie Mac drooling over them there prospective models on the universally
 appealing Star Search. Why I can't recall how many tears I've shed watching
 5 year olds belt out them tunes....

 mike
56.305Look for Orthwein's heir to be the next power figureNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 08 1993 14:3110
    
    That James Orthwein is a real bore, isn't he?  He looked half-dead up
    there at the podium, with that new designer Pats' cap propped up on his 
    head as if he'd never wore one before in his life.  If they can stretch
    this megaplex thing out long enough in the legislature, this threatened
    move problem (as far as Orthwein personally is concerned) may take care 
    of itself...
    
    glenn
    
56.306PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 08 1993 15:545
56.307VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDImus is coming to BostonThu Jul 08 1993 16:135
    	That's easy BigMac, real estate is cheaper.  Now that my seats have
    been "up"graded I hope the Pats stay in Foxboro.  If they move Joes
    like Denny, Chap and I will get "relocated" to the nosebleed section.
    
    				/Don
56.308CAM3::WAYWe pruned the house tooThu Jul 08 1993 17:3012
In addition to cheaper real estate, it's an area where there is a lot of
open space.


Since then, the site has been narrowed down, so to speak, to the
south meadows, an area near Brainard Airport and Hilltop Steakhouse
(which for years was Valle's Steak House).

That area is a fine area....


'Saw
56.309Pats for SalePATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 16 1993 15:1023
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Jul 15, 1993:

--------
Subject: Patriots for sale for $140 million
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 93 15:27:47 PDT
 
	FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- The New England Patriots will be put up for
sale next month, the Boston Globe reported Wednesday.
	The newspaper said Patriots owner James Orthwein is expected to start
entertaining offers for the team around Aug. 1. Orthwein is seeking at
least $140 million for the Patriots, the same price put on expansion
franchises by the NFL two months ago. Orthwein is involved with a group
looking to land an expansion team in St. Louis.
	Orthwein purchased the Patriots last year from debt-laden Victor
Kiam. According to the Globe, Orthwein was prompted to put the Patriots
up for sale sooner than expected after the NFL announced it would hold a
special expansion meeting in September to receive the final
presentations from five cities vying for two expansion franchises.
	If St. Louis is granted an expansion franchise, Orthwein would have
until February to complete the sale of the Patriots. St. Louis is
considered a front runner for an expansion team.

56.310VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDRealStoriesOfTheAnimalRescueLeagueThu Jul 22 1993 16:345
    	Denny and I are heading down to Smif'field this Monday to watch the
    Pats groan and sweat under Parcell's whip.  I'll put in a full report
    nexted week.
    
    				/Don
56.311PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 30 1993 13:343
    More talk of the Boston Megaplex.  Gov. Weld's plan is for the city of
    Boston to kick in some money, the Pats to kick in some money, and the
    rest will be funded via Boston Harbor gambling cruises.
56.312Actually I think it's a grand ideaCTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyFri Jul 30 1993 13:5710
    Yippee!
    I'd go on a gambling cruise..
    "Hit me" as I pass the wonderful Deer Island sewage plant.
    "Red 25" as I see kneecapped Vinny float by off the East Boston Piers.
    "Where's the one-armed bandit" as I hear hordes of Boston-whalered
    drunks make their way back to the Winthrop Yacht Club.
    
    8^)
    MikeL
    
56.313VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDYouAin'tPlayingWakeForestAnymore!Mon Aug 02 1993 16:3116
	Went down with Denny and Chap last Monday to the Patriots' training 
camp in Smithfield.  For those with a little free time I would recommend 
the trip because watching Bill Parcells is worth the trip.  This is 
definitely *his* team and it will be run *his* way.  There's nobody hanging 
around or sitting on his helmet not paying attention.  He runs a tight 
practice with every minute of it filled.  His tart one liners had us 
rolling.  During one scrimmage he yelled at Chris Slade "Slade, you've been 
in camp two days and I've already caught you for five penalties.  You ain't 
playing Wake Forest!"  Another gem was when Zolak was getting constantly 
sacked in the afternoon scrimmage, "When there's nothing there, get rid of 
the damned ball!  No wonder you guys were sacked 57 times last year!"  Like 
I said, he's worth the trip down there.  One free agent who looked 
impressive was Corey Croom a free agent running back from Ball State.  I 
would think he'll get some playing time against the Chargers.

				/Don
56.314G7BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingWed Aug 04 1993 20:358
    
    For those of you with satellite dishes who wish to watch the SD/NE
    game on Saturday, it'll be on Galaxy 7, transponder unknown.
    
    This has been a public service announcement.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
    
56.315VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDSgt.York,A.Murphy,RogerClemensThu Aug 05 1993 16:266
56.316BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingThu Aug 05 1993 18:377
    
    Don, I've observed that sometimes the Chargers play better on alternate
    galaxies.  Has something to do with weightlessness and little martian
    guys with ray guns that Bugs can really annoy. ;-)
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
    <
56.317BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingFri Aug 06 1993 20:425
    
    	G7, transponder 22
    
    	Live from Charger Central......Glenn
    
56.318Drag out the cheap UHF loop...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Aug 06 1993 20:509
    
    >	G7, transponder 22
    
    Otherwise known to us mere mortals as planet earth, UHF channel 56...
    
    ;-)
    
    glenn
     
56.319BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingFri Aug 06 1993 22:045
    
    	I guess that's true.  I would have no idea about that tho.
    
    	Live from Charger Central......Glenn
    
56.320VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Mon Aug 30 1993 15:5417
	Almost 50K for an exhibtion game?  The Pats offense looks better 
than I thought they would be but the defense is worse than I hoped they 
would be.  If the Chiefs had let Montana play 3 quarters they would've 
scored 50 on the Pats' Keystone Cops defense.  The only things that may 
allow the team to win 5-7 games are the last place schedule and Parcells' 
coaching because the defensive line and backfield are pathetic.

	Traffic was at an absolute standstill on Rte 1 after the game and 
it wasn't a whole lot better an hour later.  How come it takes a guy from 
Miami (Wierd Sam Jankovich) to get a decent traffic flow on a road in New 
England?  Last year I had to leave immediately after the 49er game (a 
sellout) and was home in less than an hour and a half.  Didn't get home 
until almost one on Saturday morning!  Anybody at the game see the skinhaid 
security guard patrolling the visitor's sideline on Friday night?  Tell me 
he don't say a few Hail Adolphs when he gets up in the morning...

		      		/Don
56.321CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Aug 30 1993 17:1012
re: da skin haid security guard

He was there lasted week too.  In the third quarter a guy with "Supervisor" 
on his shirt came over to talk with him.  At that point all your friends in 
the next section (the ones who harrass the cheerleaders) started to yell "tell
him he can smile, tell him to let his hair down".  After a few minutes of this, 
he took off the baseball cap he was wearing, ran his hand over his chrome dome,
and cracked a huge smile.

We were rollward.

=Bob=
56.322PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 31 1993 16:515
    Parcells says he'll be scouring the other teams' cuts to find a pass
    rusher and a free safety.
    
    Rumor has it there is a bidding war going on over the Pats.  One of the
    parties interested is Kraft, the owner of the stadium.
56.323has a few $$$ lying around I guessCSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's gonna wear maternity clothes!Tue Aug 31 1993 20:0910
    Yabbut either lasted night or the night before, WBZ radion had a
    interview with some guy who said he and his family are making a bid. 
    Don't remember his name but he's a native of da bahston area but now
    lives in Hollywood.  He is a movie producer and he said he'd like to
    see a stadium build in/near the city.
    
    I remain,
    not remembering his name but he's 41 years old.
    Kev
    
56.324CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Aug 31 1993 20:4113
    re: .323
    
    I forget the guys name also, but his uncle is Dick Smith, the president
    of what is now Harcore General Corporation, but for years was know as
    Gneral Cinema Corporation.  Lasted week the rumor came out in the paper
    that Smith was bidding, he denied it, but confirmed his nephew was.
    
    As a former employee of General Cinema (no, I wasn't an usher, I wrote 
    softwqare for them), all I can say is betterPacells working for Di
     Smith than me.
    
    =Bob=
                                                                      
56.326VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Tue Sep 07 1993 16:234
    	As long as they don't play in a SissyDome I would travel to
    Connecticut to see the Pats.
    
    				/Don
56.327CAM3::WAYThe Last in LineTue Sep 07 1993 16:4215
>    	As long as they don't play in a SissyDome I would travel to
>    Connecticut to see the Pats.
    
Talk here is of a real stadium, no dome.

That's just what I hear.


Connecticut folks are going "Pats in CT?  We'll believe it when we see it"


BTW, the new logo SUCKS.


'Saw
56.329CAM3::WAYThe Last in LineTue Sep 07 1993 17:0917
And as Tommy stated before there is pretty aparent unification among a lot
of factions to get this done.

For example, once it appeared that it would be feasible to do this, and
perhaps even likely, a bunch of folks from East Hartford tried to jump
on the bandwagon, and make a site available in East Hartford.

The site is Rentschler Field, the airfield on the ground of Pratt and
Whitney Aircraft, which Pratt is trying to sell off.   It is 12 acres
of level ground.

However, the "powers that be" are really set on having this thing in 
Hartford, to benefit all of the folks in downtown that would or could
benefit from this, not to mention the hotels and things....


'Saw
56.330PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 07 1993 17:212
    Well, if the pols in Connecticut decided to bail out the Whalers, why
    not take the Pats as well.
56.331VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Tue Sep 07 1993 17:254
    	Hey why not ask the state of Connecticut to donate some of their
    tax dollars to Jacobs so he can sign Bourque?
    
    				/Don
56.332PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 07 1993 17:364
    Let the Foxwood Indians purchase the team.  They could include the
    stadium in their casino expansion plan.
    
    Weld wants to pay for the Megaplex with Boston Harbor gambling boats.
56.333VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Tue Sep 07 1993 18:3713
56.334CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 07 1993 19:3012
I've had great luck on CT's new scratch game.

I bought two tickets last week, and won $2, and $50.  I cashed the $2
and came up empty on the two more tickets I bought with it.  I spent
the $50 on someone really special.

Then, the next time I bought two tickets I had a $10 winner.

6 tickets and I've won $62.....  Not bad.


'Saw
56.335SniffffCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Sep 07 1993 19:354
56.336CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 07 1993 19:4210
>Yea, those flowers you sent me were so sweet...

Dammit, =Bob=, you weren't supposed to tell anyone.  


'Saw




56.337GENRAL::WADEPull!Tue Sep 07 1993 20:106
    
    	After seeing the Pats new uniforms, it'd be hilarious for me
    	to catch any more flack 'bout *orange jersies* from a certain
    	noter.  :*)
    
    Claybone
56.338CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 07 1993 20:1216
>    	After seeing the Pats new uniforms, it'd be hilarious for me
>    	to catch any more flack 'bout *orange jersies* from a certain
>    	noter.  :*)
    
Man, do they SUCK.

I mean, that logo looks like someone used a gym-teacher's handkerchief
to blow their nose, and it kind of landed on the side of the helmet.

It ranks just below DEC's new burgundy logo on the list of totally
messed up logos.

Whoever came up with that logo should be shot.....


'Saw
56.339ROYALT::ASHEHey... what's going on?Tue Sep 07 1993 20:242
    Some Elvis lover I'm sure...
    
56.340CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 07 1993 20:258
>    Some Elvis lover I'm sure...

Elvis died on the can in mid-peench, reading a article entitled
"The Scientific Search for the Face of Jesus"

Man, can you imagine going like that?
    

56.341Cant beleive what some will fight AGAINST....MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 07 1993 21:3017
    Whats up with the Flotting Gambling casino's... Face if if people want
    to gamble there going to gamble.  The biggest thing I see happening is
    keeping the money in mass rather then sending it to Conneticut.  Where
    they dont even pay taxes on the money (Indian reservation).
    
    Ever been to CT's casino, the Parking lot is full of MA plates and the
    Busses are coming from the North...
    
    The Casino's is a great idea and will not promot NEW GAMBLERs just keep
    them in mass and help generate money for MA rather then CT or NJ. 
    Might even keep some from travleing to Vagas....
    
    This is a NO Brainer... People are going to gamble no matter what you
    do so why not have the state and government make the money rather then
    the mafia and bookies....
    
    								MaB
56.342'Saw is a very generous kinda guyTNPUBS::NAZZAROReggie Lewis - R.I.P.Wed Sep 08 1993 15:0327
    Re:  "I spent the $50 on someone really special", here are the
    Top Ten uses 'Saw had to spend the $50 on someone really special:
    
    10) Auntie Ethel needed a new set of false teeth.
    
    9) Finally got around to paying the barber for his haircut.
    
    8) Sent in the pledge to Jimmy Swaggart.
    
    7) Every secretary needs to feel appreciated.
    
    6) There was a special on "Beavis and Butthead" dolls and
       'Saw had to have them both.
    
    5) The dog needed to get fixed.
    
    4) Kev is still taking donations to buy that Mexican growth hormone.
    
    3) Ken Olson's surprise birthday party needed some balloons.
    
    2) Hartford hookers are getting expensive.
    
    and the #1 way 'Saw spent the $50 on spmeone special:
    
    1) A donation to the governor to help build a stadium for the Patriots!
    
    NAZZ
56.343CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Wed Sep 08 1993 15:072
Well, okay, if you must know, I spent the $50 on my "boys".  I needed to
buy a truss.......
56.344VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Wed Sep 08 1993 18:5611
    	Mike "Air", my point is that whenever there's talk about *real*
    gambling (wagering on sporting events, etc.) the state's arguement is
    that it is "crack cocaine" like addictive and take the moral high
    ground.  But when it's gambling where they can't lose suddenly there's
    no moral problem.  Phonyism at it's best (which is what Massachusetts
    pols excell at).
    
    	I'll be wearing what I think should be the Patriot's new colors and
    logo this Sunday (it'll be very mainly).
    
    				/Don
56.345If there going to gambel there going to gambleMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Sep 08 1993 19:0225
    Yes but this is gambling where you can get behind and lose more then
    you can afford and end up in debt to a guy you dont want to owe money
    too, and depending on your position he may take advantage of you in
    a few different ways.  This also can lead to crime becuase youd rather
    spend time in jail then owe these people money... But make it legal,
    the odds will be better and the state dont let you fall behind in what
    you owe :-), no money no play...
    
    I just feel that there's is going to be gambling no matter what you
    do.  I can place a bet with about 5 different guys today, no problem.
    If I lose I can bet until next tuesday before I have to pay up.  Have
    a bad week and you looking at some serious trouble... Id rather that
    the state was making the profit not the bookies, plus maybe it will 
    put some extra money in the budget to either lower taxes or keep them
    from going up.
    
    Floating Casino's will do one thing, keep people from going to CT and
    maybe draw some out of staters to boston rather then CT, NY or NV.
    
    Sports gambling will take money from one group, the Bookies...
    
    Im sorry but seeing less money put into the bookies pockets and the
    casino's on other state will not bring tears to my eyes.....
    
    							MairB
56.346best laugh in months38728::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Wed Sep 08 1993 19:106
>>  But make it legal, the odds will be better <<

 hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
 hhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa11111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 mike
56.347Im assuming you no what JUICE is...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Sep 08 1993 19:135
    Well Im asuming you wont pay JUICE if your betting thru the state !!!
    Most gamblers would put down many different bets, and at the end of 
    the week if they didnt have to pay the JUICE they would proberbly
    do ok....
    							MaB
56.348exit38728::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Wed Sep 08 1993 19:2521
>    Well Im asuming you wont pay JUICE if your betting thru the state !!!
>    Most gamblers would put down many different bets, and at the end of 
>    the week if they didnt have to pay the JUICE they would proberbly
>    do ok....

 Of course I know what "Juice" is....it comes from a orange...

 What makes you think the state won't charge "Juice"?????????

 They'd call it administrative costs....

 most pols learnt from the crooks that put there in the first place...

 besides the state probably wouldn't allow you to bet straight up...

 make you play a card where you had to pick 4 teams or more, in an effort
 to increase their chance of winning.....


 mike
56.349VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Wed Sep 08 1993 19:407
    	Hey I wouldn't mind the state taking a 10% vigorish, that way the
    aim is to get money bet equally.  Like I said, even though at the end
    of the year the state would come out way ahead if they booked football,
    they would rather concentrate on games, that if you or I ran on a
    street corner would be called con-games and we would time for.
    
    				/Don  
56.350PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 08 1993 20:0811
56.35115724::FRANCUSMets in '94Wed Sep 08 1993 20:126
    Other than Nevada what other states have legal sports gambling??
    
    I think it is not allowed in Atlantic City.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.352Has to be private to be fair; then where's the state's cut?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 09 1993 13:3014
    
    Somehow I just don't see the state of Massachusetts (or any state, for
    that matter) as ready or able to set up a professional Vegas-style
    sports betting operation that would allow fair, single-game wagers.
    Running a sports book is not a trivial matter, and some have gone out
    of business.  Even for Vegas it's a complicated exercise requiring 
    monitoring of national betting trends.  I agree with MikeC; if you ever 
    see legalized state-run sports betting look for it to be of the 
    pick-4-winners, collect 8-to-one ripoff variety.  It's been tried in 
    states like Oregon (don't know if it's still running or not, because of 
    the lousy payoffs) and that's what they did...
    
    glenn
                          
56.353CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Thu Sep 09 1993 13:3421
Plus, let's face it, the folks who run State Government are not all
that swift, for the most part.

I've had friends who work for the State and they tell me horror stories
about folks who simply got a state job because it's pretty secure, you
don't have to produce (cf Department of Motor Vehicles) and the work
is easy.

I can't see some enterprising young, shirt and tie, State employee going
"Golly Gee Whiz, Governor Weicker, I think we should set up a sports
betting scheme, and I'm just the guy to do it"


Glenn is right -- it's got to be private to be fair, and the state would
never allow that.


How do they do it in England?  I know they bet on EVERYTHING over there.....


'Saw
56.355CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Thu Sep 09 1993 13:5218
>     England has privately-owned book shops. Anybody who has ever bet with
>    a bookie (not me!) knows that they are nimble-minded shrewd individuals.

Thanks, I wasn't aware if they were private concerns or government run.


>    That's not exactly something the state has in surplus. 

That, my friend, is a Universal Truth.




And of course, all this talk of gambling if purely for amusement purposes
only.....8^)


'Saw
56.356yeah right......CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesThu Sep 09 1993 13:5816
    
    AND, just remember that the folks in government are the folks
    who couldn't a) either get a job in the real world or
    		 b) couldn't HOLD a real job in the business world!
    
    I mean, name one single building/project that took 30 years to finalize
    (like the new Shawmutt Center aka da new garden) the plans on in the 
    private sector.
    
    NB - the pyramids of Egypt are not eligible, they were monarchially
    sponsored!
    
    I remain,
    wondering if gov't employees can be weathermen (at 30% accuracy)
    Kev
    
56.357AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSThu Sep 09 1993 14:295
    Kevin, what happened to you starting notes with "yabbut" ?
    
    Just wondrin,
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
56.358exit38728::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Thu Sep 09 1993 14:406
 I hear we're getting Keno in this state....We ought to get our sales
 force down to see Malone and Weld and sell them some Alphas. Tell
 Weld he can get and extra 12 games per hour with our machines!!!!

 ;^)
56.359uh huhCSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesThu Sep 09 1993 16:4121
    
    Yabbut I sometimes do it for variety.  I fired up 2 brain cells on this
    gambling thing and I think it's a good idea.
    
    Foist, maybe some of the laid off digits can get employed (can you
    imagine Hawk and Dickstah dealing????).
    
    I like MikeyC's idea of populating them with Alpha's cause then we get
    to keep our paychecks for maybe 3 or 4 more weeks  :^(
    
    'nuther idea is NOT to have them state run (only causes more taxes,
    retirememt stuff and all the other baggage).  Rather, franchise or
    award a contract to a_independant company for say 5 years.  Then all ya
    gotta do is hire a few state auditors or some big 5 company.  Of
    course, this is only to minimize the mob effect.  They're gonna get in
    there anyway.
    
    I remain,
    2 cents poorer
    Kev
    
56.360VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Thu Sep 09 1993 16:4312
56.361From WEEICSLALL::BRULEBack to Life Back to realityThu Sep 09 1993 17:036
    Breaking story. Orthwein has pulled out as major backer for the St.
    Louis group looking for an NFL expansion team. No idea what this means
    or what he'll do but it could be very bad news for New Englanders.
    It could be the St Louis Patsies.
    
    Mike
56.362I'll be the first to say... I TOLD YOU SO!VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Thu Sep 09 1993 17:041
    
56.363NJ will never have legalized sports bettingOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Sep 09 1993 18:4411
    NJ had a big fight over legalized gambling but in the end the
    sanctimonious troika of Bill Bradley,PJ Carlesimo and Chuck Daly helped
    shoot it down. 
    
    A local politician who opposed it and the Donald got into a great
    argument about it on a local talk radio program. Trump claimed the 
    pol wouldn't support it because his bookie friends bought him off.
    
    I just can't see the  harm  of legalizing sports betting in a state
    like NJ. I'm also for legalizing prostitution. Prohibition doesn't
    work,but politicians don't ever do the logical thing. 
56.36415724::FRANCUSNY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTYThu Sep 09 1993 18:558
    
    In Vegas betting is prohibited on games that involve local teams - that
    pretty much means UNLV basketball. They could have the same rule in NJ,
    but that would stop action on Seton Hall, Nets, Devils, Giants, and
    Jets which is a large number of teams (especially 2 NFL teams).
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.365sortaHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyThu Sep 09 1993 19:0114
The only thing here is that the Las Vegas bettin' parlors, by agreement,
won't book UNLV. This pretty much only only effects the basketball since
very few places book 1-AA games.

They most certainly will book any fight that takes place there.

The extension to other states doesn't matter since there isn't any legal
bookmaking on sports except in Nevada. Certainly New Jersey doesn't have
it.

I feel quite confident that local, do-it-yourself entrepreneurs (bookies)
would be glad to furnish any and all lines.

TTom
56.366They don't have to have the smart money to make moneyNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 09 1993 22:5320
56.367CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Fri Sep 10 1993 17:264
Gee, am I the only one who thinks that this Bushcwhine resignation thing does 
not bode well for the Foxboro Footballers?  Seems that without ol' Jimmy's 
money from the sale for the Pats, St. Louis is no longer a lock for a franchise.
That being the case, well you know the rest...
56.368PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Sep 10 1993 17:3037
	clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Thu, 9 Sep 93:

--------
Subject: Patriots owner steps aside in St. Louis
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 93 17:01:19 PDT
 
	FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- New England Patriots owner James Orthwein
resigned Thursday as chairman of the investor group seeking an NFL
franchise in St. Louis, apparently clearing the way for him to sell the
Patriots for top dollar and keep the team in Massachusetts.
	Orthwein has been under NFL pressure to sell the Patriots as long as
he remained a majority stockholder of the St. Louis group, but his
resignation appeared to give him more time to find local buyers and hold
out for a higher bid.
	Francis Murray, a former part-owner of the Patriots and a new
stockholder in the St. Louis group, has already offered Orthwein $133
million for the team, providing the Patriots are moved to Hartford,
Conn.
	But Orthwein has promised Massachusetts Gov. William Weld to keep the
Patriots in the state for 30 years providing a way is found to build a
$700 million sports-convention center in the Boston area to house the
team, which now plays in suburban Foxboro, Mass.
	Orthwein, who will remain a minority partner in the St. Louis deal,
did not put a deadline on selling the Pats, but said he had retained the
Wall Street investment banking firm of Goldman Sachs to evaluate offers
and said he expected to ``start making decisions on our options in the
near future.''
	Weld, meanwhile, appeared before a state legislative committee
Thursday to urge approval of his plan to finance the so-called megaplex.
The proposal includes floating gambling casinos in Boston Harbor and new
state bonds, both of which face stiff opposition among legislative
leaders.
	Weld said the complex, which would include a domed statdium, would
put Boston ``in the top tier'' of convention cities in the United
States, and would allow Massachusetts to host such events as the Super
Bowl and college basketball's Final Four.
56.369The ST Louis Patroit Win Superbowl XXIXMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Sep 10 1993 17:354
    How many years are there left on the Foxboro Lease ?  I thought
    Orthewein sold his intrest to another rich dude ?
    
    								MaB
56.370DECWET::METZGERGood mornin' america, how are ya'?Fri Sep 10 1993 18:2315
It sounds like super fran put legal schananigans on the whole St Lous deal.

My prediction is that St. Loius will get an expansion franchise (in thanks for
super fran bailing out the pats), fran will sell the pats for top dollar (maybe
not until 1995 when the team begins to draw fans again after a decent season)
and will then miraculously turn his minority part of the St. Louis franchise
into a majority ownership when one of the majority owners sells his part of the
St Louis spirits to frugal fran.

fran is trying to get a bidding war between Conn and Mass over the pats and
sell out for maximum profit....


Metz
56.371fallingHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyFri Sep 10 1993 18:2416
Locally, they're trying to make a big deal of Orthwein's dropping out of
the St. Louis bid. 

Basically, this is the second time recently that St. Louis, the supposed
lock for a bid, has stubbed its toe. They were the only city in the
running to not sell out the luxury boxes. The NFL, for some reason, put
that on the list of things it wanted to see done. Charlotte, Baltimore
and even Jacksonville sold all of theirs. Now the principal money behind
the bid is gone leaving them to try to convince the NFL that they still
have a cartel with enough money to fund the $200 mil to join the club.

One irony of this may be that Orthwein won't be trying to move the Pats
to St. Louis. And the league can go a long way to prevent that by
awarding a new team to St. Louis.

TTom
56.372LAGUNA::MAY_BRMEts in (last in) 94Fri Sep 10 1993 18:526
    
    There is too many things happening at once here.  I'm too far away to
    get all the details, but some plan is being worked.  We'll probably all
    figure it out in a month or two.
    
    brews
56.374Hey, I like Barney Rubble as a mascot!CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Sep 10 1993 20:401
    
56.375ROYALT::ASHENever trust a big butt &amp; a smileFri Sep 10 1993 20:484
    I thought it was Barney Fife... figure with Mr. Drummond from Diffrent
    Strokes... Fife and Drummond would be good mascots for the Pats...
    
    
56.376VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Fri Sep 10 1993 20:504
    	Barney Bites.  One of those 'raptor dinosaurs would be a nice
    mascot though.  Walt(e), get out of this mainly Patriots note!
    
    				/Don
56.377DECWET::METZGERGood mornin' america, how are ya'?Fri Sep 10 1993 21:4713
You got it slasher....

The New England Dinos...we'd corner the kiddie NFL merchandise market and make
enough to have the state of Mass buy the Pats, lock stock and barrell and
george Kevarian could be the new nose tackle....

Bring back Tip O'neil as an o-lineman and put a dress on dukakis and let him
play QB...

Yeah,

 Metz
56.378ROYALT::ASHEWE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R.Mon Sep 13 1993 13:391
    Yeah yeah, I'll stay out of it...
56.379CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Mon Sep 13 1993 13:4740
Some miscellaneous thoughts:



	o The Patriots uniforms SUCK.  The logo does worse than suck,
	  but I just can't find the words.  The logo looks like a 
	  sick sperm cell, trying valiantly to keep up with the other
	  little sperms heading towards that egg, but doomed to be
	  in the back of the pack.

	  The logo is almost, but not quite, as bad as our new logo.


	o The Patriots defense has good speed laterally down the line
	  and they did a good job shutting down Barry Sanders to the
	  outside.  Unfortunately, he managed to get up the middle.

	o Patriots special teams need work.  

	o Patriots need a running back -- badly.  I've never seen a 
	  Parcells team throw so much, and as /Don and Denny and Glenn
	  pointed out "if the Pats had anyone who could run the ball,
	  they'd be running instead of passing"

	o Bledsoe is good.  If the Pats can build a decent team around
	  him, they can contend.  He made several plays that looked like
	  veteran QB type of plays.

	o The Pats made mistakes at all the wrong times.  They made mistakes
	  on key plays, and lost the game.


	o The cheerleaders are fine -- very fine, and there's more of them
	  now.

	o The girl who was running the camera for CBS was looking VERY
	  good.....


'Saw
56.380PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 13 1993 14:378
56.381CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Mon Sep 13 1993 14:5613
>    I think Russell is just fine.  The reason a Parcells team is throwing
>    so much is because he finally has a QB who can throw.  They've also
>    been forcing themselves into playing catch up.

Parcells had a QB who could throw in NY.  Simms has proven that again
and again.  Simms just didn't have great wide-outs.  He could hit
Bavaro though....

Russell doesn't seem to have a lot of speed.......


'Saw

56.382MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Sep 13 1993 15:217
56.383MKFSA::LONGAll gave some, some gave allMon Sep 13 1993 16:2724
	I'm gonna hafta disagree wit ya, Frankie, on the uniforms.  I like 'em.
	After all think of all the negative things that go along with the color
	red....
		o  the color of the British imperialists' coats
		o  the color no one wanted to be related to in the McCarthyism
		   years (Commies)
		o  the color no one likes to see in their bank book
		o  the color your face turns when you are either embarassed or
		   really pi$$ed

	Blue is the all-American color.  Somebody told me yesterday that it was 
	like the Steelers changing their logo and uniforms.  Again, I disagree.
	If and when the Pats ever have a dynasty or even a string of winning
	seasons, then all this fuss about changing the logo and uniforms would
	make sense.  I would think true Patriot fans would want to erase any
	reminder of how absolutly atroucious they were.  After all that's exactly
	what the Steelers did when Chuck Noll took over and the rest is history.

	As far as the cheerleaders and Russell go, I'm in total agreement wit ya,
	'Saw.  I spent all night last night cleaning the slobber off of my 
	binoculars from yunz guys.

	
	billl
56.384FRETZ::HEISERnotes from the lost civilizationMon Sep 13 1993 16:292
    Is the line protecting Bledsoe, or will he see the same fate as a young
    Jim Plunkett?
56.385CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Mon Sep 13 1993 16:3320
>    Is the line protecting Bledsoe, or will he see the same fate as a young
>    Jim Plunkett?

For the most part, Bledsoe had good protection yesterday, I thought.



re Bill and the unis:


	Their unis look "cheap and chintzy", kind of like the old USFL
	stuff.

	I didn't get any slobber on your binoculars....  After that bozo
	behind me spilled beer on my seat, I just slobbered on myself,	
	so I could be wet from both sides......


'Saw

56.386ROYALT::ASHEWE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R.Mon Sep 13 1993 16:453
    Chris Berman made a USFL crack about the uniforms last night... Then
    again, he did when they change to the Pittsburgh Loons too...
    
56.387MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Sep 13 1993 16:503
  I thought the old unis and logo were just fine  but I don't care if they
 traipse around in tutus as long as they win football games.
56.388DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Sep 13 1993 18:265
    	Well, just before the new logos, etc., were unveiled, someone
    	said the old logo looked "like someone taking a dump." I agreed
    	then and I still agree now.
    
    	Scott
56.389PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 13 1993 19:245
56.390CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Mon Sep 13 1993 19:2811
56.391DECWET::METZGERGood mornin' america, how are ya'?Mon Sep 13 1993 20:2622
After two games does anybody want to go back to the draft and take Rick Mirer
over Drew Bledsoe? 

I said it then and I'll say it again. This guy is an NFL super stud and if he
can survive this year and parcells gets to throw around some of super frans
cash for some O-linemen (they are in great shape under the salary cap) the Pats
will be a contender in a couple of years.

Parcells is smart enough to adapt his style to his players. The Pats will have
a balanced attack but it will be more throw then the Giants were under his
reign. Irving Fryar will wish he stayed in NE (although he's got a decent QB
throwing to him).

Mirer is playing magician here in seattle, repeatedly running for his life
behind an offensive line that carries red capes as part of the standard uniform
(in order to ole the defensive linemen on their way to Mirer's mid section).


Metz


56.392Well MikeL might disagree with 'ya MetzMSE1::FRANCUSNY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTYMon Sep 13 1993 20:324
    what imagery Metz.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.393CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Sep 13 1993 20:3713
    Why would I disagree with Metz?
    
    Nowhere in his reply did he say that Mirer would be a flop, only
    that he be running for his life. I assume he thinks Bledsoe was better
    than Mirer and I have no problem with that. In fack, he jest might
    be right. I only objected to Metz stating that Bledsoe was 10X the QB
    that Mirer is. I disagree with that, but we'll soon find out!
    
    BTW, I'm happy that the Pats drafted Bledsoe rather than Mirer.
    But that don't mean Mirer is chopped liver either.
    
    MikeL
    
56.394MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Sep 13 1993 20:403
 I'm with MikeL. It's also a little tough to tell how good Mirer really
 is right now when he's constantly in survival mode.
56.395Still, the early impressions are favorable...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 13 1993 20:5029
    
> After two games does anybody want to go back to the draft and take Rick Mirer
> over Drew Bledsoe? 
    
    Drew was my man then, now, and until he otherwise demonstrates that he's 
    not the star in the making that he appears to be, always.  It was 
    Slashmain and Tommy that wanted to draft that midget linebacker Marvin 
    Jones ;-), who last I heard couldn't crack the Jests' starting lineup 
    (although that may have been due to reasons other than his ability, like 
    falling behind after his holdout; I really don't know).
    
    Bledsoe has the ability but he does have a long way to go.  The one
    thing that disappointed me in yesterday's game was that after surviving
    some pretty good pressure (he may need to be more attentive about
    holding onto the ball with this team's pass protection) and executing 
    well on some nice timing patterns on the game-tying drive and on 
    that nice long-gainer to Russell in overtime, he kind of choked on the 
    first reasonably "easy" deep opportunities he had against the Lions' 
    secondary all afternoon.  I don't know what caused the Lions to finally 
    break down back there, but on the first missed play that Brisby kid was 
    wide open for the game-winner, and on the other play the Lions' DB had 
    to grab some shirt to contain his man but the zebra ruled that Bledsoe's 
    pass was too high and too far out-of-bounds to be catchable.  After 
    playing a pretty decent game, those missed opportunities on the last 
    possession of the game left a bit of a bad taste as far as Bledsoe's 
    overall performance went...
    
    glenn
    
56.3962 pt. sit is betterFRETZ::HEISERnotes from the lost civilizationMon Sep 13 1993 21:094
|    As anyone who has played the line knows, you're supposed to look like
|    that while in a 3 point stance!
    
    I never use to 3 pt. stance while taking a dump.
56.397MSE1::FRANCUSNY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTYMon Sep 13 1993 21:118
    re: .395
    
    Bledsoe is a rookie; those were rookie mistakes. I wouldn't worry about
    it at this point. If he is still making those mistakes consistently at
    the end of the season it might be of greater concern.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.398PARVAX::WARDLE_MTue Sep 14 1993 00:5910
    re: .396
    
    Not even when camping? Ya know...two pt squat stance with one arm
    behind for support? 
    
    re: Bleed-so
    
    Bledsoe = Ken O'Brien
    
    JoJ_NOT
56.399CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 14 1993 13:2412
>    
>    JoJ_NOT
>


Hey, JoJ_NOT,

Please tell JoJ that FrankWa says the Scorpions RULE!


thanks,
'Saw
56.400VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Tue Sep 14 1993 17:156
    	Hey Marie, take it to the Sissy Note (a.k.a. Jests Note).  Bledsoe,
    Slade and Brisby looked good Sunday, but they still lost and the
    defense couldn't contain Sanders or Moore when they really had to. 
    
    
    				/Don
56.401PARVAX::WARDLE_MWed Sep 15 1993 02:005
    Slasher, JoJ knew you'd come back with some baloney about the Pats
    looking good....and what the heck kinda name is Brisby for a football
    player?
    
    JoJ_NOT
56.402ROYALT::ASHEWE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R.Wed Sep 15 1993 02:181
    Same as Norman, Blair and Browning?
56.403MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Sep 15 1993 12:5115
    
 >> Drew was my man then, now, and until he otherwise demonstrates that he's 
 >> not the star in the making that he appears to be, always.  It was 
 >> Slashmain and Tommy that wanted to draft that midget linebacker Marvin 
 >> Jones ;-), who last I heard couldn't crack the Jests' starting lineup 
 >> (although that may have been due to reasons other than his ability, like 
 >> falling behind after his holdout; I really don't know).
   
    Jones' problem is that he's having trouble picking up the Jets' defense
    whether that's because he held out or he's just stupid, I don't know. 
    The jury, as far as I'm concerned, is still out whether the Pats picked
    the best player in the draft. Mirer is stuck with that gad-awful line up 
    in Seattle and Jones is off to a slow start. Give it two or three years
    and we'll see what's what.
     
56.404KOD warningHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyWed Sep 15 1993 14:536
I just picked up Drew for my FFL team. I'll probably start him against
Seattle so everyone should expect a_underachieving day outta him.

What's this I read about the center hurt and out?

TTom
56.405MKFSA::LONGAll gave some, some gave allWed Sep 15 1993 16:157
>>What's this I read about the center hurt and out?

	I read that too in this morning's paper.  


	billl
56.406VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Wed Sep 15 1993 16:286
    	Hey TommyB, it would be ironic though if both Bledsoe and Slade
    were all-star performers and Jones was yet another in a series of Jests
    draft blunders.  I would gladly munch crow if that were the case.
    
    
    				/Don
56.407PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 15 1993 16:345
56.408MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Sep 15 1993 18:004
  I remember Jets fans booing the selection of Jeff Logeman on draft day. Of
 course, now the guy's a Pro Bowl player and a dirty one at that. Two things
 that New Yorkers can appreciate.
56.409PARVAX::WARDLE_MThu Sep 16 1993 00:498
    Well, one Jets fan predicted that Lageman would be a pro-bowler. Who
    was that masked fan? Why, JoJ (a.k.a. Carnac) of course.
    
    Whereas /Nostra_have_another_DONus was WRONG AGAIN.
    
    JoJ_NOT
    
    
56.410PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 16 1993 13:565
56.411VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDSFGiants'93,NYStockExchange'29Thu Sep 16 1993 15:414
    	Yeah, what's JoJ's overall average in predicting successful Jester
    draft picks?
    
    			Nostra/DONus
56.412or, they might loose ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesMon Sep 20 1993 13:1712
    
    Yabbut it seems that the patsies are, if nothing else, keeping ya
    interested in the outcome of the game.  They almost tied it with a
    couple of seconds left in the game, only to have the field goal attempt
    hit the crossbar.
    
    Mirer won the battle of the QB's, imo.
    
    I remain,
    having a premonition they might win next week!
    Kev
    
56.413and the other half on his backPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 20 1993 14:213
56.414tough break on that FG attemptFRETZ::HEISERAWANAMon Sep 20 1993 16:141
    
56.415Pigskinnus Interruptus 8^(VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNewYork-ItsNotOverWhenItsOverMon Sep 20 1993 16:301
    
56.416VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNewYork-ItsNotOverWhenItsOverMon Sep 20 1993 16:5315
    	On the bright side Chris Slade is no longer a "ball in tall grass"
    anymore.  Forget stats, for the entire second half the Seahawks ran
    their play away from Slade's side about 90% of the time.  Late in the
    fourth quarter Parcells was flipflopping Slade and Tippet so Seattle
    wouldn't know where he was.  He may be the best player on the team
    right now.
    
    	Singleton continues to verify that the trading down of their '90
    pick (and passing on Kennedy and Seau), for two lower round picks may have
    been the biggest draft day blunder in Pats history (and that's saying a
    lot!)  Somebody actually rented a plane to fly the following banner
    over Foxboro Stadium: "We wanted wins not blue jerseys and a crap
    logo".  I loved it!  
    
    				/Don
56.417PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 20 1993 17:191
    What's a ball in tall grass?
56.418DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Sep 20 1993 17:356
    	Mac,
    
    	Ball in tall grass = Cannot be seen
    
    	I think,
    	Scott
56.419MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Sep 20 1993 17:514
  Parcells said about Slade earlier this year:

  "He's like a ball in tall grass. You know what that is? Lost."
56.420SOME GOOD THINGS AMID THE GLOOMTNPUBS::NAZZAROReggie Lewis - R.I.P.Mon Sep 20 1993 18:4711
    Singleton got benched for Todd Collins, who played a terrific 4th
    quarter - had five tackles and an interception.  He stuff Warren on a
    3rd and inches at the Seahawk 29 to force a punt late in the 4th
    quarter.
    
    Vincent Brisby also got benched, but I don't know why.  If anyone
    should sit down, it's Timpson.  But getting Ray Crittendon on the field
    was a great idea.  That catch he made over the middle to keep the final
    drive alive was a thing of beauty!!!!!!!!
    
    NAZZ
56.421VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNewYork-ItsNotOverWhenItsOverMon Sep 20 1993 19:015
    	NAZZ, were you there?  On the pass to Crittendon late in the game
    Ben Coates was wide, wide open over on the sidelines and would've
    trotted into the end zone had Bledsoe seen him.
    
    				/Don                 
56.422AKOCOA::BREENThe Last Pennant RaceMon Sep 20 1993 19:498
    Heard a fella say he watched game at rockingham - not a bad idea on
    blacked out games
    
    Same guy is full of hope for pats - why or how can parcells lose 3, 2
    at home to ordinary teams and come up roses while same thing last
    year..  well, you know
    
    the century of imaging is upon us all
56.423DECWET::METZGERUNIX is cool, huh-huh, huh-huh-huhMon Sep 20 1993 20:0320
It took the New England defense to make the Seattle offense look good. 
I don't think the Seahawks scored more than 16 points in any game last season.

The big thing the pats lacked is a Rb catching passes out of the backfield.
John L. Williams burnt the pats several times catching them. The Pats defense
also made Chris Warren, who is a decent back, look all world.

Bledsoe needs to learn to look off to secondary recievers instead of fixating
on 1 guy. Watch steve Young for a lesson in how to do this.

The Pats should abandon all pretense at a balanced offensive attack and work on
a hurry-up, no huddle approach to maximize their scoring chances. They have no
offensive line to run block....

Nice effort by the kicker.....almost went to O.T.....


Metz
 
56.424PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 20 1993 20:207
56.425Seachickens Sip Soggy Seaweed...but can beat the PatsPARVAX::WARDLE_MMon Sep 20 1993 22:423
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
    
    JOJ_NOT
56.42638728::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Tue Sep 21 1993 12:335
Mac, any coach who would double-team Fryar, deserves to be in an unemployment
line.............

mike
56.427CAM3::WAYImmature Color LikerTue Sep 21 1993 15:3913
Most folks forget that Parcells first year with the Giants was 3-12-1, and
yet in three seasons he had them to the Super Bowl.

That first season the Giants lost a lot of close games, and all of us
Giants fans were doing the same thing that some of the Pats fans are doing
now -- pissing and moaning.

His system brought two rings to a franchise that hadn't had a champeenship
in 30 years.  And you can bet that if the Pats DO get back to the Bowl,
they won't throw up such a pathetic effort as in 1985.....


'Saw
56.428SCHELL::francuspo' po' ChappyTue Sep 21 1993 15:424
In 1985 the Bears would have massacred whatever team they met
in the Super Bowl.

The Crazy Met
56.429MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Sep 21 1993 15:442
 Except the Dolphins.
56.430SCHELL::francuspo' po' ChappyTue Sep 21 1993 15:545
Nope. Dolphins that year did beat the Bears in Miami, but the Dolphins 
were not THAT good; Bears would have had even more incentive to beat
them up in the Super Bowl.

The Crazy Met
56.431maybe not38728::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Tue Sep 21 1993 18:157
DOn't be so sure of yourself there TCM. Most of the Bears' ability that year
was built on inner motivation, had they met and got down early to Miami after
already loosing to them once I could see them doubting theirselves and blowin
it.....Shula not the greatest genius around was a tad smarter than Ditka...

mike 
56.432SCHELL::francusNY YANKEES: A SPORTS DYNASTYTue Sep 21 1993 18:469
Miami was sooo up for that game against the Bears; not just the teams the
whole freakin' city. A friend of mine who taught 3rd and 4th grade in Miami
at that time said that the next day all the kids were basically asleep
since they had all been allowed to stay up and watch the whole game. If I recall
the Bears were 11-0 or 12-0 and Miami was the only team that remotely had
a chance to prevent an unbeaten season. I'm pretty sure the SB would have been
very different. Bears defense in the playoffs was awesome!

The Crazy Met
56.433history the ACC way...38728::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Tue Sep 21 1993 19:144
If LandettA hadn't wiffed, the Giants would have kicked their butts.....

mike
56.434VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWins-NotBlueJersey&amp;CrapLogoTue Sep 21 1993 19:521
    	Quit talkin' about DaBeers and Midgets in my note!
56.435Coates wasn't the only guy Bledsoe missedTNPUBS::NAZZAROReggie Lewis - R.I.P.Wed Sep 22 1993 18:348
    Yeah, I was there.  Up in the booth wif da Ninj.  Ya gots the best
    of both worlds up there - see the game on the field, and watch the 
    replays on the monitor.  I musta missed Coates on the play.
    
    John Hendry sez Hello to everybody.  He hasn't broken a beachball in 
    a long time, and misses them good ol' days.
    
    NAZZ
56.436PFSVAX::JACOBListen to the music of the nightMon Sep 27 1993 01:5310
    Hey Slasher,
    
    Ya gotta love that Patsie's defense in the firsted half tonite, eh??
    
    35-0 Jets in the first half alone.
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    
    JaKe
    
56.437CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Mon Sep 27 1993 11:589
The Pats defense was sieve-like last night, and Boomer was slicing
through them the way Kev cuts the cheese at the OPP.

However, the second half seemed much more like a normal Jets-Pats game,
the second half total being 10-7.   Of course, the Jets went to Nagle
so perhaps that explains it...8^)


'Saw
56.438SCHELL::francuspo' po' ChappyMon Sep 27 1993 12:393
looks like /er will have to pay up this year.

The Crazy Met
56.439Who's the best to pick?CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesMon Sep 27 1993 12:5018
    
    Yabbut is it too early to start talking about who the Patsies should
    draft when they have the #1 pick?
    
    Will Parcell get sacked?
    
    When will the Patsies get a few breaks by the ClemsonRefs(tm)?
    
    What will come first, hell freezin over or the Patsies 1st win?
    
    Heard on the radion thisted AM that so far in this decade, the Pats
    have won NINE (count 'm 9) games.  Soooo, what's the problem?  Ya want
    everything??????
    
    I remain,
    stoopid enough to stay up and watch it until they scored!
    Kev
    
56.440CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Mon Sep 27 1993 13:518
>    
>    Will Parcell get sacked?
>    

Probably not.  His first year in NY was 3-12-1, the second year was 9-7
and then two years after that they won the Super Bowl.

'Saw
56.441ROYALT::ASHEcheck da hook while da DJ revolves itMon Sep 27 1993 15:432
    It is too early.  Cincy is pretty bad too..
    
56.442MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Sep 27 1993 15:508
  It would have been nice for us Pats fans if we could have pointed to just
 one positive thing in last night's game but there wasn't anything. Not one.
 Bledsoe stunk. The o-line stunk. The d-line stunk worse. Russell couldn't
 start for any other team in the league. McMurtry couldn't shake a martini.
 The defensive secondary was just awful. This team would have to improve a
 whole heap just to suck. To make matters worse, playing in the AFC East ain't
 the picnic it used to be. We might not win a game all year. 
56.443PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 27 1993 15:595
56.444CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Mon Sep 27 1993 16:0219
>  It would have been nice for us Pats fans if we could have pointed to just
> one positive thing in last night's game but there wasn't anything. Not one.
> Bledsoe stunk. The o-line stunk. The d-line stunk worse. Russell couldn't
> start for any other team in the league. McMurtry couldn't shake a martini.
> The defensive secondary was just awful. This team would have to improve a
> whole heap just to suck. To make matters worse, playing in the AFC East ain't
> the picnic it used to be. We might not win a game all year. 


There was one positive thing.  One of the NE receivers, I forget who
(A TE perhaps), kept going over the middle, taking the shots and trying
to catch the ball.

A receiver who will do that is a good thing, which will pay off when
the team becomes competitive, especially in those 3rd down situations....


JMHO,
'Saw
56.445QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Mon Sep 27 1993 16:086
      re-1
    
      By the time the team is competitive,  the guy going over the middle
    will have his career ended;^)
    
      Tim
56.446PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 27 1993 16:136
56.447MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Sep 27 1993 16:2313
   >> Are you thinking of Coates?  He had the ground knock out 2 nice catches
   >> in traffic.  
    
      One of which was ruled incomplete but shouldn't have been. He did
      look good but he won't last long if Bledsoe keeps hanging him out to 
      dry. He seems to be Parcells' favorite of the two tight ends. He's
      more of the rugged Mark Bavaro mold than Cook who is a receiver first
      and a blocker second. I was so disgusted after the first half that
      I didn't bother to watch the second but from what I've heard,the Jets 
      took pity on us or the score could have been even worse. Man, do we
      need next Sunday off.
      
      
56.448do dis qualify?CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesMon Sep 27 1993 16:2510
    
    	Yabbut Tommy shirley you remember da announcers saying that the Noo
    Yawk Jests have *NEVER* shut out da Patriots!  Thisted goes back to
    1960 so the fact that they scored with a REAL touchdown to put some
    points on da board, instead of those girly-mon field goal attempts had
    to be, imho, "one good thang".
    
    I remain,
    Kev_on_Stats!
    
56.449PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 27 1993 16:298
56.450CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Mon Sep 27 1993 16:326
I was thinking of Coates.

Poor guy looked totally knackered late in the game....  But he has guts.


'Saw
56.451It could all be on the line in that contestTNPUBS::NAZZAROReggie Lewis - R.I.P.Mon Sep 27 1993 16:589
    THE GAME of the season:
    
    
    Sunday, December 12
    
    
    Cincinnati travels to Foxboro to take on the Patriots.
    
    NAZZ
56.452LAGUNA::MAY_BRMEts in (last in) 94Mon Sep 27 1993 17:0910
    
    Think we could have a two week buildup ala the SuperBowl in this note
    for the upcoming Cards-Pats game?  
    
    lemme start it off
    
    
    Pats sip! Cardrool!
    
    boC
56.453LAGUNA::MAY_BRMEts in (last in) 94Mon Sep 27 1993 17:174
    BTW, the over-under for the game here in two weeks is 30,000. Fans,
    that is.
    
    brews
56.454stick a fork in Bugel; no way they go 8-4 nowFRETZ::HEISERAWANAMon Sep 27 1993 17:502
    The Cards did have some misfortune via the refs yesterday, but they
    still sip as well.
56.455ROXLEE::francuspo' po' ChappyMon Sep 27 1993 17:557
yeah Brews bold prediction for the Cards is becoming a surer and sure bet of
earning for him an honored spot in topic #50.


/er what's the deal you have with JoJ? is it for the season series??

The Crazy Met
56.456VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDBarkley &gt; BarneyMon Sep 27 1993 19:088
    	TommyB, there was something positive about last night.  I only paid
    two dollars more for a pitcher of Killian's Red than I would have paid for
    12 ounces of some swill beer had the contest been at Foxboro.  Craze we
    bet a six pack on each game in the series.  The last two years the Pats
    won the second game to give me the push.  Cincinnati vs. New England in
    the Marshall Faulk Bowl!
    
    				/Don
56.457ELMAGO::BENBACAI don't need no stinking Package!Mon Sep 27 1993 22:341
     Don't forget Tampa is in the running too
56.45845-7PARVAX::WARDLE_MMon Sep 27 1993 23:344
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...HEY SLASHER, SEND THAT 6 PACK RIGHT AWAY
    WILLYA!!!!
    
    
56.459ROYALT::ASHEcheck da hook while da DJ revolves itTue Sep 28 1993 12:522
    Atlanta look solid, huh?
    
56.460VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDBarkley &gt; BarneyTue Sep 28 1993 15:263
    	Come and get it Waddle!
    
    				/Don
56.461JoJ does Slasher!!! Film @ 11:00CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesTue Sep 28 1993 15:281
    
56.462still New England, thoughHBAHBA::HAASCarolina Blue: Politically CorrectTue Sep 28 1993 15:478
What's this about moving the Pats to Connecticut? 

I heard a blurb that they're working on some contract that if approved
would have the team move somewhere to Connecticut.

Any details? Insight?

TTom
56.463MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Sep 28 1993 16:027
    
     There has been talk in here for awhlie about Connecticut trying to 
    lure the Pats to the Hartford area. In fact, there's a front page
    story in the Globe (that I haven't read yet) about Connecticut
    approving $252 million in financing for a new stadium. A couple 
    of more games like this past Sunday's abd Connecticut might want to
    rethink this.
56.464ROYALT::ASHEcheck da hook while da DJ revolves itTue Sep 28 1993 16:072
    Waddle's a BC grad and a Bear, get with it /Don..
    
56.465ROXLEE::francuspo' po' ChappyTue Sep 28 1993 16:1210
The CT legislature approved funding for a stadium in Hartford if the Pats
commit to moving into it. This depends on Fred Murray (the old Pats owner)
convincing Orthwein (sp?) (the current Pats owner) to sell the team to Murray.
Murray would then commit to moving the team to CT.

Keep in mind that no one is happy with the Foxboro facility. But for the MA
legislature to get anything done can take years - just witness what shenanigans
went on to get a new Boston Garden built.

The Crazy Met
56.466CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Tue Sep 28 1993 17:0415
Folks down here are experiencing a plethora of morning wood over this
possibility.   They are holding rallies, the legislature is legislating....

Personally, I think it is a waste of time.  I will believe that the
Patriots will be in CT when, and not until, the opening kickoff of their
first game here.   

But I'll tell you right now it's NOT going to happen.....



btw, have I told you all lately how much the Pats uniforms SUCK?


'Saw
56.467ROXLEE::francuspo' po' ChappyTue Sep 28 1993 17:066
'Saw

why are you so sure it won't happen? because the NFL won't allow it? NFL
has a tough time stopping franchise moves (see Al Davis and Bob Irsay)

The Crazy Met
56.468ROYALT::ASHEcheck da hook while da DJ revolves itTue Sep 28 1993 17:092
    They don't suck, 'Saw, they blow, remember?
    
56.469CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Tue Sep 28 1993 17:258
>why are you so sure it won't happen? because the NFL won't allow it? NFL
>has a tough time stopping franchise moves (see Al Davis and Bob Irsay)

I dunno.  Just a feeling.  I don't see the folks from Massachusetts giving
up their team.....


'Saw
56.470ROXLEE::francuspo' po' ChappyTue Sep 28 1993 17:277
But do you see the MA legislature doing anything within the next 10-20 years
to help keep the Pats?? Not getting into the issue of should governments
do this or not, CT clearly has, MA therefore likely needs to come up
with something. If they had such a bad time getting anything done for the
Celtics and Bruins I just don't see the Pats faring any better.

The Crazy Met
56.471PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 28 1993 17:472
    I really don't think the NFL would step in to prevent a team from
    moving from one spot in New England to another.
56.472CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Sep 28 1993 17:518
Orthwhine will never sell the team to Fran Murray, since he can't come up 
with enough scratch.  (As I recall, the Whiner wants $110 Mil, and the Murray 
group can only com up with $104 Mil).

Orthwein will hang on until somebody comes up with the $110 mil, or until he 
has an excuse to move the team to St. Louis.

=Bob=
56.473But then there is the business of the leaseAKOCOA::BREENThe Last Pennant RaceTue Sep 28 1993 17:511
    
56.474PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 28 1993 17:525
56.475CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Tue Sep 28 1993 17:5310
I don't know that much about the Mass legislature, but I think they'd
want to keep the Pats.

=Bob= has the best point, but then there is always another $6 million to
be found.   Hell, I'm sure Shamu the Governor can work a deal with the
Mashentucket Pequots to put a few more slots in Foxwoods, marked 
"NE Pats to Harfaa or Bust"


'Saw
56.476Two different animals...RAAJI::MORGANTue Sep 28 1993 17:5310
    Ya right, TCM.  And the already overtaxed taxpayers of Massachusetts 
    are going to jump for joy when they realize that their cash
    strapped state is going to build a stadium for the worst team in
    football.  No thanks.  They've got a billionaire owner that could
    basically gives a hoots ass what's good for the people of New England.
    
    The Garden was different.  It's being built with private funds, 
    although the state did deed the land to the builder. 
    
    					Steve
56.477MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Sep 28 1993 17:548
  As Craze as already pointed out, the NFL has already lost in court when they
 tried to prevent Al Davis from moving the Raiders. If Murray buys the Pats and 
 wants to move 'em there's nothing the league can do short of begging him not
 to do it. Murray is using the old Irsay/Davis ploy of ringing concessions out
 of a desperate city/state to line his own pockets. He's got the pols down in
 the Nutmeg state falling all over themselves to build him a stadium. How much
 of his own dough is he tossing into this joint? Not much if any I'm sure.
56.478you can stay or you can goCSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesTue Sep 28 1993 18:0719
    
    Yabbut what if we "loaned" the Patsies to Harffa for a couple of years
    while (or until) the new stadiom is built.  Ya know, we could have the
    right of re-call and bring them back.
    
    and, oh by the way,  I really don't care if they stay or if they go.
    I don't go to Foxboro and since they (until recently) didn't sell out
    the stadium, I don't see them on tee vee.  I gotta listen to them on
    the radion.  This works out pretty well because then I can get chores
    done around the house and not be glued to the couch and tee vee so it
    really doesn;t matter to me where the game is played.  It's all the
    same at my house.
    
    :^)
    
    I remain,
    wondering if anybody likes da new uniforms?
    Kev
    
56.479PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 28 1993 18:078
56.480PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 28 1993 18:084
56.481PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 28 1993 18:106
56.482ROXLEE::francuspo' po' ChappyTue Sep 28 1993 18:126
Kev,

but if they moved you could see them every week since Hartford is beyond
the black-out area.

The Crazy Met
56.483HmmmmCSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesTue Sep 28 1993 18:1810
    
    Mtm, it's the latter.  No Ch22.
    
    Craze, but then how would the house chores get done?
    
    
    I remain,
    I guess just full of questions today....
    Kev
    
56.484RAAJI::MORGANTue Sep 28 1993 20:145
    Mac,
    
    And you don't think gambling is a regressive form of taxation?
    
    					Steve
56.485DECWET::METZGEROwner of the scorpion petting zoo.Tue Sep 28 1993 21:5717
Pet Peeve alert...

 Personally I don't consider any sort of gambling a "tax". A tax is the
goverment taking money directly out of your pocket when you purchase a goods or
service or in the case of an income tax directly out of your paycheck.
 
 Gambling is an individuals desire to try and convert a small amount of money
into a larger amount by taking a chance where the odds are not in your favor.
No goods or service is purchased and the individual has free choice whether or
not to "give" his money away....

 State run gambling isn't a tax in any way shape or form much less a regressive
tax like a tax on food or clothing is....

Metz
 
56.486PARVAX::WARDLE_MWed Sep 29 1993 00:1911
    re: /Don
    
    Hey, if the Pats move to CT, will you and your buddy from that appeared
    in SI still be allowed into the stadium?
    
    Heck, Hartford is only a couple of hours from NJ, why not just buy a
    green hat and root for a real team and give up on those shiny pants
    girly mon Pats?
    
    JoJ_the_unchained
    
56.487KALI::MORGANWed Sep 29 1993 11:2217
    OK, Metz we'll go by your definition.  But, let me add to my point. 
    
    Massachusetts recently overturned the public education system in the 
    state.  They'll be pumping in something like $1B/yr within 5 years to 
    the cities and towns.  Problem is, nobody knows where the money's going 
    to come from!  As we all know, it'll most likely come from increased
    taxes.
    
    Wouldn't the money from these "floating casinos" be better used to fund
    education or provide financial help to students attending state
    colleges/universities?
    
    I'd rather have my tax money go to something a bit more productive than
    a domed stadium for the billionaire owner from St. Louis, thank you. 
    That's where I'm coming from.
    
    					Steve
56.488Go to ST. Louie and free up my TV!!!CNTROL::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Wed Sep 29 1993 11:286
 Maybe after they skim their 80% adminstrative cost off the Keno money
 they'll be something left for the schools. I'll bet that's the snowjob
 they're selling on the hill....

 mike
56.489Oh well, just Massachusetts being stupid...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Sep 29 1993 12:2530
    At this point I dont care if they use the money for the Domed Stadium
    which by the way will bring/keep a lot more in this city then the pats.
    Possible SB site, Soccer, concert, etc, etc, etc.  So all the local
    businesses/businesmen will benefit from this.  Which in turn brings
    more tax money into the state.  And if they send some money towards the
    school's thats even better.  Bottom Line is they better get there act
    together SOON... Because casion gambling is coming to Mass weather we
    want it or not.  The Indians (not sure which tribe or where) are
    looking at several sites to put a casino on in MASSACHUSETTS.  So we
    get the benefit's of gambling with NO TAX DOLLARS... so lets see if I
    get this straight.. 
    
    	1) We (the state) could put in casino's, on or around boston harbor
    	   and use the profits directly towards building a stadium and then
    	   continue to run/operate them bring money into the state for
    	   other uses...
    					or
    	2) Let an Indian tribe build a casino on Indian land, they keep all
    	   profits and dont pay taxes ??????
    
    	I dont know If im understanding this correctly anyone who doesnt
    	think number 1 is the way to go has more problems then anyone in
    	here can help them with :-)
    
    Like Ive said before, the casino's wont premote more gambling, and now
    with an Indian Tribe looking for somewhere to put one, its only a
    matter of time before there's a casino anyway so why not take advantage
    of it now....
    
    If this doesnt go thru its just another wasted opputunity....
56.490PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 29 1993 12:474
56.491Baloney it's not a tax-- the state keeps half the moneyNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 29 1993 13:0017
    
    As far as I'm concerned, the part of the lottery revenues that get paid
    back to bettors (maybe around 50% tops, because these lotteries are the
    worst kind of suckers' bets) is not a tax, and the part that the state
    keeps is.  What else can you call it?  It's a tax paid for the
    "privilege" of gambling with the state, just like the taxes paid for
    the privilege of buying cigarettes or alcohol or whatever else.  It
    also happens to be a whopping tax; like I said, upwards of 50% and
    beyond, depending on the game.  I see no difference with the lottery 
    just because it might be a service that some feel is the most frivolous 
    and discretionary activity of all (I feel the same way about
    cigarettes, but I'm not going to tell cigarette smokers that they're
    not paying taxes, but rather are making a "voluntary contribution" to
    the state).
    
    glenn
       
56.492PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 29 1993 13:043
    Glenn, nobody said it wasn't a tax.  Metz and I were just pointing out
    that it was a voluntary tax.  Steve seemed to think it was a tax that
    hit everyone.
56.49316039::francuspo' po' ChappyWed Sep 29 1993 13:207
re: .489

The argument that stadiums bring in incredible amounts of revenue, leading to
more tax revenue, etc. is not that clear. A number of studies have shown that
the benefits are generally far far less than anticipated.

The Crazy Met
56.494MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Sep 30 1993 15:2513
    
      Word is that Zolak is getting most of the snaps in practice so
     far this week (Courtesy of The Globe). The reason given is that
     they want Bledsoe to rest his arm. That may or may not be true,
     but I hope Parcells doesn't hesitate to go to Zolak if Bledsoe
     shows once again that he can't get it done. Bill owes it to the
     rest of the team and the fans up here to give us a chance at at
     least one win. I realize that Bledsoe is in the midst of a learning
     process but I can't see how he's gonna learn all that much getting
     crumpled and tossed aside. The other thing is that the Pats have 
     brought in  Dave Bavaro to work at inside linebacker. If they had 
     just drafted Jones, he could be playing inside LB and Scott could 
     be starting QB and we might not be enduring the agony that we are.
56.495PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 30 1993 15:482
    Parcells has 2 weeks to get ready for the next game.  I'd hope he'd be
    working in some of the backups.
56.496VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDSOMFAOLMUFAThu Sep 30 1993 18:234
    	The season's shot.  Go for the draft pick (and offer season ticket
    holders a 20% rebate).
    
    				/Don
56.497MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Sep 30 1993 18:496
    I don't think they have to "go" for the draft pick. With the talent
   of this team they can play as well as they're capable of and still have 
   a good shot at the pick. Other than Vincent Brown and Harlowe (on a good
   day), I can't think of any they have that is above average at their pos-
   ition.
56.498PFSVAX::JACOBUmgwana Cik BuudieThu Sep 30 1993 18:5413
    
    >>	The season's shot.  Go for the draft pick (and offer season ticket
    >>holders a 20% rebate).
    
    Spoken like a true season ticket holder, eh Slasher??
    
    I agree with ya on the draft pick part, but anybody who was dumb enuf
    to put the money out deserves to lose it.
    
    (8^)
    
    JaKe
    
56.499Tippett is getting oldPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 30 1993 19:061
    Tommy you forgot our 2 Pro Bowlers -- Bruce Armstrong and Marv Cook.
56.500MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Sep 30 1993 19:156
  Armstrong coming back from that knee injury and isn't 100% yet and Cook
 seems to be in Parcells' doghouse. I think Bill believes taht little 5'10"
 180 lb. guys should be receivers adn big guys like Cook should be bashers.
 But as receiving tight ends go, Cook *is* above the league average so that
 makes a total of three.
56.501PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 30 1993 19:256
56.502CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Thu Sep 30 1993 19:5111
>    
>    Cook says the first thing he did after he found out Parcells was going
>    to be the new head coach was to request a neck brace like the other
>    linemen wear.

Yabbut, in New York Bavarro was always way up on the reception list.  IN
1986 he was their bread and butter receiver....


'Saw

56.503PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 01 1993 12:142
    Yabbut, ya gotta throw sometime and with the WRs and QBs the Giants
    had, it's no surprise the TE was high up on the reception list.
56.504yeah rightCNTROL::CHILDSThat SIR is an Unmitigated FabricationFri Oct 01 1993 12:172
 Bull, Mac!! Bavaro was up there cause Bavaro was GREAT!!!!
56.505MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Oct 01 1993 12:235
 Bavarro was as well rounded a tight end as has been in the league in some 
time. He was certainly a hell of a lot better than what we have. Given Parcells'
and Perkins' conservatism and the wr that we have, if we had someone like Mark
Bavarro, he'd be leading this team in receptions, too.
56.506CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Fri Oct 01 1993 12:4514
If you look back at the 1986 season, one thing you find over and over
was Bavaro getting open up the seam in the zone.  Simms (who proved by
Super Bowl XX that he was a top echelon QB -- better than anything that
Pats have had) routinely would find him there, and hit him.

The Giants WR corps did get it done in 1986, especially McConkey in the
clutch 3rd down situations......  Bavaro was a monster, and the Giants
running game was tough too.....


That Pats could use a TE like Bavaro, thats for sure....


fw
56.507and about 25 other teamsCNTROL::CHILDSThat SIR is an Unmitigated FabricationFri Oct 01 1993 13:209
>>  That Pats could use a TE like Bavaro, thats for sure....



     So couldn't the Jints......

 mike

56.508CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Fri Oct 01 1993 13:224
>     So couldn't the Jints......

Amen......

56.509CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Fri Oct 01 1993 16:002
Unfortunately, right now Marv Cook looks totally lost on the field.  He is 
obviously having trouble adjustoimg to the new offense.
56.510Bledsoe....It's Nagle '93!!!PARVAX::WARDLE_MSat Oct 02 1993 13:068
    I agree with Big Mac on the Bavarro issue...who else could Simms throw
    to? Oh, I remember, that perennial pro-bowler, Phil McConkey...
    
    re: Slasher
    
    Drew Bledsoe <= Browning Nagle
    
    
56.511CAM3::WAYJade is COOL....Mon Oct 04 1993 11:5820
>    I agree with Big Mac on the Bavarro issue...who else could Simms throw
>    to? Oh, I remember, that perennial pro-bowler, Phil McConkey...
    
Do me, JOJ.


Simms connected with Manuel quite often, but not so much on 3rd down.

I think it was Manuel, or Stacey Robinson, that Phil hit on the big
4th down play in Minnesota, late in the game which helped the Giants
turn it up another notch in that season.

As to McConkey, he was good at what he did, and he was a spark plug
for the team.  What more could you ask for?


Jets self-destructed yesterday.  So did the Giants.....


'Saw
56.512PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 04 1993 15:219
    According to the Worcester paper, Fran Murray has 2 stadia ready to be
    built if he can buy the team from Orthwein.  The CT legislature
    approved a bill to fund a stadium in the Hartford area if the Pats
    commit to moving there.  There is a group in St. Louis willing to build
    a stadium for Murray if he'll move the Pats there.  Meanwhile Orthwein
    is being very quiet.  Massachusetts is asking for $6 mill/year plus
    rent to build a stadium for Orthwein.  Speculation is that after the
    expansion franchises are announced there will be a bidding war between
    the losers over the Pats.
56.513VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDGoPats. GoToStLouis,Baltimore...Tue Oct 12 1993 15:386
    	Denny and I were wondering if any of our southern Deccies could put
    us up for the Super Bowl in Atlanta?  It's obvious that after lasted
    Sunday's game the Patriots will be the AFC representative.  Thanks in
    advance.
    
    				/Don
56.514LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesTue Oct 12 1993 15:449
 >         Denny and I were wondering if any of our southern Deccies could
 >   put    us up for the Super Bowl in Atlanta?  It's obvious that after
 >   lasted    Sunday's game the Patriots will be the AFC representative. 
 >   Thanks in    advance.   
    
    And next week the 'skins fans will be figuring that they will be the Pats
    opponents.
    
    boC
56.515FORTY2::FOWLERMCome the glorious dayWed Oct 13 1993 07:325
How did Bledsoe do in the win?

I hear he got inured, but did he do anything before then?

Mike
56.516On his way??AD::HEATHThe jinx is broken, Sox '93 ChampsWed Oct 13 1993 09:2510
    
    
     Bledsoe played allright but they where loosing when he got hurt. 
    Secules came in the Cards fell apart and Pats won.  Bledsoe is not
    putting up ROY type numbers but has shown he IS going to be a great
    QB.  I did hear on the tube that he won't play on Sunday against the
    Houscum (is that what youze guys call them in here?), but the sprain
    knee is not serious.
    
    Jerry
56.517Need a stamp to git in (fat one preferred)CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Oct 14 1993 18:0826
    Hear ye... Hear ye.... Special Announcement
    
    Patriots Look For Assistance for Halftime show....!@!!?
    
    Yassirree,
    Lisa Coles' asst PR director for the NEPATS, is looking for all
    would-be Elvis impersonators to hep out with the halftime show.
    Don't matter how good/bad you is, just call Lisa at WEEI or the
    Stadium.
    
    So go home and buff up yo' rhinestones, break out yo' favorite gaudy
    white jumpsuit, uncrate those Vitalis and Brylcreem bottles and
    git some throat spray to practice some warbling fer Sunday. No
    experience necessary; but a few shots a Jack will sure help!
    Don't ferget yo' Percosans, Percosetts, ups, downs and in-betweens!
    
    
    Goin' home to practice
    "Thank ya. Thank ya very much."
    "Hunk-a-Hunk-A-Burnin' Love!"
    "BaabaaBlue Blue BLue Christmas!"
    
    How'd ah sound?
    MikeL
    
    
56.518METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Oct 14 1993 18:176
>How'd ah sound?
>MikeL

pathetic.

The Crazy Met
56.519-1, Then I qualify!!CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Oct 14 1993 18:221
    
56.520PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 14 1993 18:394
    Elvis impersonators at halftime?  I knew this new logo would start
    leading to stuff like this.
    
    When is the San Diego chicken scheduled to make an appearance?
56.521GENRAL::WADEPull!Thu Oct 14 1993 20:176
    
    MikeL,
    
    	You couldn't carry a tune in a bucket!
    
    Claybone
56.522po' po' Slasher.....CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesFri Oct 15 1993 14:5812
    
    	Yabbut Denny said that the reason slash don didn't go lasted night
    was 'cause he's got a baaaad cold and since he wants ta be sure to
    be able to make the Patsies game on Sunday, he was medicatin himself
    with brandy.
    
    	What I wanna know, cause Denny didn't 'splain it, is  who is this
    babe Brandy that /don is gettin medicated from?
    
    I remain,
    Kev_for_Jed_Clampit
    
56.523PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 15 1993 15:138
56.524VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDP.C.Beavis&amp;ButtHead-ChangeIt!!!Fri Oct 15 1993 15:155
    	Sad but true Kev, given a choice between a ::SPROTS GitTogether and
    the HaplessPats, the HaplessPats (Elvis Halftime Show and all) get the
    nod.  No offense (appropriate phrase for the Patriots' Note).
    
    				/Don
56.525Yabbut cain ya describe brandy for po' po 'Saw?CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesFri Oct 15 1993 15:191
    
56.526VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDP.C.Beavis&amp;ButtHead-ChangeIt!!!Fri Oct 15 1993 15:308
	The NFL Suits fined Corwin Brown $3,500 dollars for a perfectly 
legal hit on Derek Ware.  I guess the litmus test for whether a hit is 
legal, is not if you use the crown of your helmet when delivering the blow 
(Brown didn't), but whether the player hit (the hittee), is knocked out of 
the game.  Good thing they didn't do this when Donnie Shell played, 'cuz he 
never would've made any money playing this game.

				/Don
56.527PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 15 1993 15:3311
56.528LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesFri Oct 15 1993 15:3512
    
    And the Cardinals all agree that the hit was legal.  Hey, it could be
    worse.  Cecil got fined 30K for two VERY similar hits.  He's got a
    bigger rep though.  Could you hear the Cardinals fans chanting "thirty
    thousand dollars" after Brown's hit?  It was funny.
    
    Credit should be given to the Cards and Redskins (Cecil's hits) for not
    whining about it the way the folks in Philly did.
    
    They're trying to turn the NFL into soccer.
    
    boC
56.529more Denny.....CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesFri Oct 15 1993 15:4513
    
    	Yabbut and Denny said that he also head that somebody with the Pats
    said that he was gonna bring one of the "NFL bonecrunching hits" videos
    they're selling with him and show it to them!
    
    Seems that there might be a bit of hypocracy with the NFL, hawking
    bone crunching stuff to the unwashed masses and also fining a guy for a
    bonecrusher play!
    
    I remain,
    wondering what Mr. G Rillar would do?
    Kev
    
56.530LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesFri Oct 15 1993 15:485
    
    Hey, the NFL gets money both ways.  Fine the players, then sell the
    tape.
    
    nutting wrong wif dat!
56.531VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDP.C.Beavis&amp;ButtHead-ChangeIt!!!Fri Oct 15 1993 16:019
    	Patrick Forte, the vice president of football operations is
    supposedly going to include "NFL Rocks" with his appeal of the fine on
    Brown.  The Suits are trying to convince the SortOfFan that when played
    within certain rules, subject to change weekly, injuries won't happen. 
    Of course anybody who knows anything about football knows this is
    folly.  It's a violent game and people are going to get hurt, if this
    aspect turns you off then watch Disney On Ice or a soccer match.
    
    				/Don
56.532small nitMKFSA::LONGDEC, get outa VN, NOW!Fri Oct 15 1993 16:377
	re fines:

	Brews, I believe the fines levied against the players, and the teams
	for that matter, are donated to charites. 


	billl
56.533nfl mgtment = sleazesAKOCOA::BREENFri Oct 15 1993 16:4912
    Who's to say this isn't simply nfl using publicity from fines to
    advertise their game.  Main argument against that is to say that nfl is
    not that sleazy.  Weak argument.
    
    And I am somewhat concerned with the way spreads are going vis a vis
    eventual results.  Denver - GB last sunday is latest game where unusual
    spread is followed by favored team going crazy.  It was an understated
    fact that the main reason nfl wanted instant replay was because of the
    need for control where so much gambling was going on.
    
    Call it just a feeling or just sour grapes over my poor prognosticating
    lately - tho I'm still surviving koh
56.534DECWET::METZGERAsk me if I care.Fri Oct 15 1993 17:2213
I saw a really neat helmet the other day on TV that has an airbag collar on it
that deploys when the impact is made with the crown of the head. It's supposed
to take up to 500lbs of pressure  off the spine.

All you have to do is wait until a crucial play. Whpa somebody on top of the
head with the foreign object hidden in  your trousers  deploying the  airbag
and  making them sit out a play to get a new helmet....The NFL would rival the
WWF and Conrad  dobler and his bag of cheap tricks could make a comeback...

It's perfect...

 Metz
56.535VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDP.C.Beavis&amp;ButtHead-ChangeIt!!!Mon Oct 18 1993 15:137
	UGH!  The worst thing that happened to the Pats was Commander Cody 
getting hurt.  Houston's 3 million dollar backup was about the only hope 
the Pats had.  He threw more bad passes than a nerd in a single's bar.
I didn't figure Moon to miss wide open receivers.  Boy I bet the Dolphins 
wish they had Secules now (I wish they did).  

				/Don
56.536PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 19 1993 15:544
    The Pats snatched another defeat from the jaws of victory.  I couldn't
    believe the announcers saying what a great game Cody Carlson was
    playing until he got hurt.  If the Pats' DBs had hands we woulda seen
    Cody benched and the Pats with a decent lead.
56.537VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDP.C.Beavis&amp;ButtHead-ChangeIt!!!Tue Oct 19 1993 20:0211
    	Hey BigMac who was the announcer?  Namath?  Something was wrong
    with Cody prior to his going down because before that offensive series
    Moon was warming up.  Then Carlson came limping off the bench and
    started to throw to Warren.  I thought the whole ice throwing incident
    between Jeffries and Gilbride was directed at the referees, course we
    had the offensive lineman and their big butts shielding most of the
    Houston bench from our view.  Man the way the Pats are playing those
    three December/January games (two after major holidays) are looking
    pretty tough.  Here's hoping for warm weather at least.
    
    				/Don
56.538PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 19 1993 20:0712
56.539VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDP.C.Beavis&amp;ButtHead-ChangeIt!!!Tue Oct 19 1993 20:305
    	Todd C?  Boy does that guy love the sound of his own voice.  Cripes
    I was better off sitting in the drizzle than having to listen to that
    cacophonous claptrap.
    
    				/Don            
56.540PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 19 1993 20:477
56.541CNTROL::CHILDSthems that die are the lucky onesWed Oct 20 1993 13:223
 Charlie Jones was working with Todd...what a team....love to listen to Todd
 do Donkey games....
56.542QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Wed Oct 20 1993 16:2112
      I'm sure you do Mike since you both are anti's!
    
      I did like one of Deirdorks coments the other night.
    
      Elway has been harrassed all night,  maybe he should tell his linemen
    to put on rear view mirrors so they can see whats happening behind
    them.  
    
       It was a great slam to the donk OL that wasn't playing.  Maybe
    Elway pissed 'em off.  Na, that would never happen (-).
    
      Tim
56.543ROYALT::ASHELivin' in the fridge...Wed Oct 20 1993 20:184
    Namath wasn't hired thised year.  I loved when Sean was talking about
    something the other night and used the word "pah-lay" instead of
    "play". He then declared: "I'm slipping into my Joe Namath
    impression"...  
56.544VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDFrog Baseball Rooolz!!!!Thu Oct 21 1993 22:3622
56.545I'm flabbergasted!NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 22 1993 13:0513
                                                         
>    Well Doc was taking his usual stance against the Oilers management
>    but, honest to God, he praised the Boston press for not pandering to 
>    management of the local teams when such issues arise here, unlike in 
>    Houston. 
    
    What a brown-noser that DrM is. ;-)  Praising a stooge like Eddie
    Anvilhead and his Boston media cohorts for not pandering to local teams
    (did the word "Celtics" come up in this conversation?).  Hahahahahahaha.
    I've heard it all now...
    
    glenn
     
56.546VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDFrog Baseball Rooolz!!!!Fri Oct 22 1993 14:299
    	Actually yes Glenn, I'm paraphrasing what Doc said, but is was
    something like "When the Red Sox, Patriots or Celtics pull a stunt like
    this the media doesn't let them off the hook like the Houston press
    does the Oilers".  But to give credit where credit is due, Doc actually
    came up with a rib-tickler when Eddie was explaining that good Texas
    barbeque is hard to find up here Doc said he doesn't go looking for
    good clam chowder in Houston either.
    
    				/Don
56.547ROYALT::ASHELivin' in the fridge...Fri Oct 22 1993 19:585
    Doc eats meat, just not pork... last I heard anyway...
    
    Just like him to suck up to Eddie though.  Probably thought there
    was a free Reebok shirt to go with it...
    
56.548VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDFrog Baseball Rooolz!!!!Mon Oct 25 1993 14:594
    	Ugh!  The Patriots should have a new slogan for this year "Losing
    Ugly".
    
    				/Don
56.549USCTR1::KINGLook, I can hear what you are thinking.....Mon Oct 25 1993 15:056
    Nice seeing you /er and the boys at Partners Pub... And thanks for the
    drinks they were the best....FREE!!!!!!!!! It was an UGLY lose...
    I still have not heard of any "kicking" tryouts as of today... :-]
    
    
    REK
56.550Wins are ugly tooQUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Mon Oct 25 1993 17:144
      I thought all the the patsies games were ugly losses?
    
      Ti
    
56.551QUASER::HUNTERHow Do You Spell Win... G L Y NTue Oct 26 1993 18:306
    
    Slasher...  I feel for ya buddy...  I for one thought the 
    Patsies would have been doing much better this year than 
    they have...  Like 2 wins at least !!!   HA!!!!
    
    BG
56.552METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Oct 26 1993 18:325
/er wouldn't have any sympathy for you, no need to give him any.

HtH,

The Crazy Met
56.553Could be worse BigGame, I could be a Mets fan...VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDFrog Baseball Rooolz!!!!Wed Oct 27 1993 15:571
    
56.554METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 27 1993 16:065
little consolation /er. Pats have been worse than the Mets over
the last decade (Mets won something and competed for most of the time). 
And at least with the Mets they don't have games in 20 degree weather.

The Crazy Met
56.555VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWe Want Zolak!Thu Oct 28 1993 13:545
56.556METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Oct 28 1993 13:596
56.557CNTROL::CHILDSthems that die are the lucky onesThu Oct 28 1993 14:058
56.558VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWe Want Zolak!Thu Oct 28 1993 14:594
    	It does save on ice costs Mike.  Hey Craze, you baseball/soccer
    types wouldn't understand...
    
    				/Don
56.559METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Oct 28 1993 15:143
/er some things ar not worth understanding ...

The Crazy Met
56.560Grass brought to you at Foxboro courtesy a the soccer types...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 28 1993 15:2012
> Hey Craze, you baseball/soccer types wouldn't understand...
  
    That's right, we discriminating consumers demand that the games be
    played on god's green grass and under god's blue sky.  If it were
    anything but I wouldn't even bother waiting to see how good the
    tailgating is.  Besides, /er, just because the Patriots move doesn't
    mean you can't still tailgate in Foxboro.  I'm sure if you ask nicely 
    Eddie Anvilhead'll still let you do it for the $10... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
56.561CuriousQUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Fri Oct 29 1993 16:076
      TCM,
    
      Since you can't handle the mainly cold, does this mean you own an
    electric blanket?
    
      Tim
56.562MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Oct 29 1993 17:014
    nope, never had an electric blanket.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.563VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDDoNotDemeanCuzWeGrowCorn!!Fri Oct 29 1993 17:247
56.564featuring Wonder Woman as Pat Riley16421::HEISERvisualize whirled peasFri Oct 29 1993 17:521
    He has Knickerboxers Underroos(tm)
56.565Rams to possibly move to Baltimore?AKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 01 1993 13:2112
    As this relates to NE Pats it may be good news in that one out of town
    prospective bidder will be taken care of.
    
    That leaves Memphis and Jacksonville as possible homes for pats.
    
    The Rams originally were in the All America Conference and possibly
    were originally in Baltimore.  In the late 40s when I was more
    interested in Kukla Fran and Ollie (did I hear they were making a
    comback?) there were a couple of attempts at a rvial league to nfl and
    the final result were the Baltimore,Rams,Browns and one other nfl team
    (Pitt?).
    
56.566TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Nov 01 1993 14:015
56.567VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDAu revoir NAFTAMon Nov 01 1993 15:257
    	You know, when Zolak was warming up yesterday I really thought that
    Parcells was going to swallow his pride and put him in.  Next week
    against Buffalo the quality of the opposition will be considerably
    greater than it has been the last two weeks (when the Pats actually 
    looked like they could've won).
    
    				/Don
56.568MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 01 1993 15:3210
   I could understand why Parcells might not want to take Bledsoe out
  if the kid was struggling. After all, Drew is supposed to be our qb
  of the future and you want him to learn and get some confidence and 
  realistically we aren't going to the playoffs anyways. But Secules
  is just a backup. If he ain't doing the job then yank his butt out
  of there and give Zolak a shot. Z-man certainly would be hard pressed 
  to do worse than that spirit-killing INT in the endzone. It's painfully
  obvious why Miami let Secules go. What's not so obvious is why Parcells
  is in love wuth the guy.
56.569MKFSA::LONGDEC, get outa VN, NOW!Mon Nov 01 1993 15:4217
	I watched most of this game, while reading the new insurance options,
	(Rip Van Winkle got nuthin' on me) and saw that glare Parcells gave
	Sisson after he missed a field goal.  Wow, if looks could kill.

	Then "noclue" Secules tosses an inti in the endzone and he gets a
	pat on the butt from "The New England Messiah", otherwise known as
	Bill Parcells.  What IS this guy's problem with Zolak?  I know,
	everyone keeps talking about the "attitude" thing, but I really
	find it hard to believe that a coach of Parcells' supposed caliber
	is carrying this grudge this long.  It's no wonder Zolak has an
	attitude!  Wouldn't you?

	Turner continued to look good.  The defense gets a B- from me. 
	A step up, but there's still room for improvement.


	billl
56.570VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDAu revoir NAFTAMon Nov 01 1993 15:4910
	Well Billl, aparently Zolak's problem is he too free a spirit for 
the coach.  According to the Globe both defensive coordinator Al Groh and 
Maurice Hurst are hinting that the problem here certainly isn't the defense.
Hey guys, who gave up game winning drives late in the fourth quarter the 
last two games, Secules, the offense?  If you hold the Bills to 9 points then 
you can crow, but Seattle and Indianapolis don't exacltly bring back 
memories of the Montana 49ers or the Fouts Chargers.  Hey like the paper 
said, even Rod Rust won against the Colts!

				/Don
56.571Pretty soon Channel 4 might start paying to black out games...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 01 1993 15:5912
    
    These games like New England-Seattle and New England-Indy are so bad
    that it's almost purely academic that someone even gets the "W".  You
    might as well watch the games looking just for the good and bad points 
    and put the final score at a priority somewhere down around which team
    has the uglier uniform.  That the Indy fans were cascading the field
    with boos as their QB was kneeling down to run out the clock on a
    *victory* speaks volumes about the quality of play (and Indy fans
    aren't exactly known for Philadelphia-like dispositions...)
    
    glenn
         
56.572CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childMon Nov 01 1993 16:006
What you guys are finding out is that Bill Parcells loves Bill Parcells
and Bill's never wrong. To admit Secules sucks would be to admit he was
wrong......

mike
56.573MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 01 1993 16:099
    
  >> These games like New England-Seattle and New England-Indy are so bad
  >> that it's almost purely academic that someone even gets the "W".  

     It may be academic to the casual viewer but it ain't academic to Pats 
     fans at least not this one. I'd rather have an ugly win than a pretty 
     loss. Of course, what we're getting lately is butt ugly losses. I want 
     to see some wins. I don't expect a whole lot of 'em but I'd like to see
     a few and screw the aesthetics.
56.574Just ventingMAYES::MAILLOUXMon Nov 01 1993 16:1812
    
    	Yesterday listening to the post game show on the radio, Gino or
    	maybe it was Gil Santo commented on how well Sisson was booming
    	field goals through the uprights from 60 yards out! What I want
    	to know is what the hell is he trying to prove? I mean when was
    	the last time they tried a 60 yard field goal...I would think
    	especially with his consistency, that he should set up some place
    	around the forty where 85% of attempts come from anyway, and 
    	practice more realistic game situations. Also this comparison
    	thing with Bledsoe and Mirer, what you have to remember is Mirer
    	is two years older than Bledsoe. That's a big difference at this
    	stage in their careers. Plus Mirer has REAL receivers to throw to.
56.575remedial arithmetic for parcells etalAKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 01 1993 16:5318
    I heard something about the colts fans booing their team running out
    the clock for the victory.  I was listening as pats wasted their final
    time out and as soon as the interception occurred knew it was over
    since this wasn't Michigan-Illinois.
    
    Apparently the spread not being covered was the reason for the boos or
    else fans want to get the full 60 minutes worth.
    
    Perhaps instead of having the qb drop to a knee they should just
    concede at the point where defense has no timeouts to cover remaining
    seconds.  Patriots need to learn to save those timeouts but apparently
    they had [just] called them on the last plays of colt's possession.
    
    The problem with use of timeouts at the end of the game is that it
    takes fourth grade level arithmetic and where in the world are
    you going to find a football coach with that type of math. ability.
    
    bill
56.576Just stay in New England...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 01 1993 16:5814
    Another Missed FG and another close loss.. Is it the offense or the 
    defense ?  The Detroit, both seattle games and now this one were all
    in reach of the offense and at least 2 of them should have been won.
    And in all these close games there were missed FG and INT in the red
    zone... so is it the offense's fault, you bet your a$$, but should
    the defense be offended, excited or mouthing off, I dont think so
    seeing that theyve givin up more pts then any other defense in the
    AFC (only the Rams and Falcons have givin up more pts).  Id say thats
    no reason to seek praise...
    
    They need a new owner and less distractions (and write off this year).
    They are still rebuilding, longest rebuild process Ive ever seen...
    
    								MaB
56.577QB problems again.BUMP::MMARLANDWed Nov 03 1993 14:049
This team needs a Legitamate QB. They have all rookies or 2nd string backups
at the reigns. Lets get us a veteran, to show the youngsters a thing or two.
There's know to learn from. I think if Hugh Millen was QB this year the pats
would have 3-4 wins. Secules is not gonna get the job done and Zolak had 
2 dream games last year, and that's it.

They have some quality offensive players they just need a solid QB to lead them.

 
56.578From Tampa Bay!BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Nov 03 1993 14:385

	re .-1   Steve DeBerg is available  :-)

	Kevin
56.579DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Wed Nov 03 1993 15:126
    	Kevin,
    
    	Shush up! The next thing ya know, we'll be watching DeBerg
    	hobbling around at Foxboro. 8-)>
    
    	Scott
56.580MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Nov 03 1993 15:2213
  Parcells isn't about to bring in any veteran QBs. I'm not happy
 that he's continuing to play Secules but at least this coach and
 front office aren't looking for any quick fixes and panicking when
 something doesn't seem to work. We weren't going  to the playoffs 
 this year. We probably won't next year either. But we can over the 
 next few years build a team that will be successful for several years.
 That's what Parcells is attempting to do. You need only look at how
 many players he's let go and how none of them have caught on anywhere
 else to realize that the guy knows talent and we didn't very much of it.
 I'd like some wins as much as any Pats fan but for now I'll give Bill 
 the benefit of the doubt. I think he knows a little more about football
 than I do. It'd be pretty damned said if he didn't.
56.581Another ASU guy...KALI::MORGANWed Nov 03 1993 16:165
    Best news I heard all day was Singleton getting the gate.  Half their
    1st round picks in the last 10 years are gone.  Our sincere thanks to
    Steinberg, Mendes and the biggest stiff of the bunch, Jankovich.
    
    					Steve
56.582don't be badmouthin the Droods, they'll get ya!16421::HEISERvisualize whirled peasWed Nov 03 1993 16:181
    Stop it now, Steve.  Singleton was a Mildcat.
56.583PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Nov 03 1993 17:021
    I told you guys to hang in there with Leonard Russell.
56.584Leonard "forward lateral" Russell ;-)16421::HEISERvisualize whirled peasWed Nov 03 1993 18:521
    
56.585MKFSA::LONGa foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mindTue Nov 09 1993 11:549
	Heard on the way to work this morning...

	Patriots named their new team doctor...




	Dr. Jack Kavorkian

56.586PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 09 1993 12:341
    Parcells has invited a couple of kickers for tryouts this week.
56.587VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDI'llTakePerotAndGiveThePointsTue Nov 09 1993 13:409
    	At least we got Patriettes' Cheerleader posters after the game. 
    Hey Mike Childs, what did you think of the Foxboro "mob" cheering
    Secules' injury?  8^)  And speaking of that, the way Cornelius was
    carrying on you would've thought that the "mob" was saying stuff about
    his mother or something.  Course I can understand him and the rest of
    the Bills wanting Secules to stay in the game.  He was an asset, for
    Buffalo!
    
    				/Don
56.588CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childTue Nov 09 1993 15:0910
I wasn't surprised Don. I was there against Seattle when they booed Grogan
off the field and annointed Tony Eason as a saint. I then saw said "Saint"
doused with beer going into the tunnel when he turned out to be another
Grogan...

I said C's fans Don. Whole different mentality from Pats fan although many
are the same....

mike
56.589trying out KickersOURGNG::RIGGENSales gets commisions we get &quot;JACK&quot;Tue Nov 09 1993 16:162
What position are these kickers going to play ILB ?  Free Safety ?

56.590VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDGo Boston University!Mon Nov 22 1993 15:249
	Hey Tommy Brydie!  Did you happen to catch IRVING FRYAR's game 
winning touchdown reception yesterday afternoon?  Or maybe you saw the ESPN 
clip of FRYAR's devastating block on a Higgs (I think), touchdown last 
Sunday against the Eagles.  He remains the consumate professional, doing 
whatever it takes to put his team on the plus side of the scoreboard every 
Sunday.  Congratulations to IRVING and a Bronx cheer to the Patriots for 
letting such a team oriented player leave their midst.

				/Don
56.591MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Nov 23 1993 14:059
  Yeah, I saw Irving on Sunday. Big deal, he beat the Pats' secondary for
 a long bomb. He'll choke in a big game just like he always does. 

 BTW - Pats fans forget about Marshall Faulk. If you want to talk running
       back the best one in the country will be playing against FSU Saturday
       in the person of Eric Rhett from Florida. Even so, I wouldn't take
       either one of those two over JJ Stokes, receiever from UCLA, if he 
       forgoes his senior year.
56.592MKFSA::LONGHelp! I've lost my OBL and can't get up!Tue Nov 23 1993 14:1210
	Do you really think they'll go after another "franchise" player?
	How many "boy he's going to be great in a couple years" rookies
	can one program endure.  I expect them to look to make drastic 
	improvements at the running back position.  However, it will 
	probably come from a "proven" veteran.

	Just my hunch.


	billl
56.593Gee thanks coach!!SPECXN::BROWNReal Men only need 12 bitsTue Nov 23 1993 14:166

	I petty the proven veteran getting traded to the pats, whomever 
 he may be!!

 Cadzilla2
56.594MKFSA::LONGHelp! I've lost my OBL and can't get up!Tue Nov 23 1993 14:194
	Could be worse.  He could be sent to Cincinati!


	billl
56.595MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Nov 23 1993 14:2610

   >> I petty the proven veteran getting traded to the pats, whomever 
   >> he may be!!
    
       Anyone who has watched this team knows that it's a comer. It's 
      the second youngest team in the league, they've only been blown 
      out once and they have an excellent, young offensive line. I don't
      think it's any exagerration to say that we're two or three players
      from being a playoff team. And maybe even less players than that.
56.596bring back Cookie GilcrestSPECXN::BROWNReal Men only need 12 bitsTue Nov 23 1993 15:0011
	How many times will we here that this team is a comer!! This franchise
has never had a winning tradition and would not how to develop one if their
life depended on it. Its been more of a tax writeoff for the owner than a good
team. They ran off the only coach they had that made it to the big show.  They've
let the good players they had get away because they were to cheap to pay them. 

     Parcells may be a good coach, but his record has been proven with some
great team players, and not what he has now.   

 Cadzilla2
56.597VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesTue Nov 23 1993 17:1838
56.598MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Tue Nov 23 1993 23:506
    re: .597
    
    /er did you confuse the Patriots with the Red Sox? hahahaha
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.599This is a decent team to watch...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Nov 24 1993 19:1223
    Well were use to seeing the pats lose and lose big.  In the past we
    couldnt even say what if we had a FG kicker who could hit a bldg from
    10 yrds out... Face it this pats team has lost 6 games by a combined
    17pts and in just those games Sisson missed 6FG (18pts).  So the 
    statement that there a few good players away is very credible.  If
    say Morten Anderson was playing in NE I feel pretty confident that
    they would be more like 6-4 or somewhere along those lines.  Sisson
    has cost this team alot.  Im not sure how to look at this team. With
    a great Kicker they could be a borderline Playoff team (Under the
    circumstance's theyve been in so far this season) but they would
    have a middle of the pack type draft pick.  Sisson and Sisson alone
    has been in position to tie or win 4 games and blew them.  And how
    many times did the pats punt instead of attempting a 50yrd FG ?????
    
    I hope Sisson comes around and finishes up the season strong, he seems
    to have a strong leg just no confidence.  Think about it, there coming
    ohh so close, if Sisson snaps out of it, they get the kicker they 
    thought they drafted :-), a low draft pick, plenty of money to spend
    in the Free Agent Market and a 5th round pick...  Next year will be fun
    in Foxboro :-) (I think I'll attend a few next year before they start
    selling out).
    
    								mab
56.600PTOVAX::JACOBJohn Elway is so YUMMY!!!Wed Nov 24 1993 20:374
    Good teams find a way to win, bad teams find a way to lose.
    
    JaKe
    
56.601QUASER::JACKSONTAElway for MVP?Wed Nov 24 1993 20:554
      AGreed,  look how Denver lost to Muffalo in the AFC champeenchip game
    2 years ago.  Had to depend on FG's, which 3 or so were missed.
    
      Tim
56.602PARVAX::WARDLE_MWed Nov 24 1993 23:147
    The Pats sip, big time. Fryar is great, and they miss him. Who replaced
    him? Brisby? HAHAHAHAHAHA
    
    Yeah, they're up and coming...next year they'll win 2 games. Then
    Parcells will retire again, and they'll hire Lou Holtz.
    
    JoJ_NOT
56.603PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 29 1993 13:325
    How often does a team have a runner rack up around 120 yards in a game
    and lose?
    
    According to yesterday's NBC broadcast duo, Parcells says his first
    priority in the draft is a running back.
56.604CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 29 1993 13:4418
>
>    How often does a team have a runner rack up around 120 yards in a game
>    and lose?
>    

I dunno.  

I think if the Pats didn't fumble, then you figure they might have won.


>    According to yesterday's NBC broadcast duo, Parcells says his first
>    priority in the draft is a running back.

Yep.  I don't doubt that.  Parcells doesn't have the kind of runner he
wants on the team....

'Saw

56.605Johnson of Northern Illinois could be better16421::HEISERbut I *like* it!!!Mon Nov 29 1993 14:276
    Re: Marshall Faulk
    
    It definitely wouldn't hurt the Pats to take a look at LeRon ( or is it
    LeWon?) Johnson (Northern Illinois).  Afterall, he's only the 4th back 
    ever to rush for 2,000 yards in the NCAA.  I'm curious to see how he does 
    in the Senior Bowl against Division 1 talent.
56.606another close but no cigars...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 29 1993 15:079
    Is weatley still around, isnt he more of the Parcells type RB ?
    If they end up with the #1 pick, I hope they trade down a few
    and grab weatley and let faulk go else where...
    
    Garrison Hearst didnt cut it, but the power backs are doing ok
    this year...
    
    								mab
    
56.607Just say no to Tyrone Wheatley, please...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 29 1993 16:0731
    At the risk of taking another beating about it, I still like Marshall 
    Faulk over the other running backs.  He adds another dimension with his 
    demonstrated ability to catch the ball out of SDSU's pro-style offense.  
    Yes, I happen to believe he's the real thing in the mold of the 
    Barry Sanders/Emmitt Smith-type back.  I did hear that ESPN geek Fred 
    Edelstein pushing Wheatley as Parcell's type of back and projecting 
    him as the Pats' selection, leaving Faulk to someone else (forget who) 
    in the top three picks, and I hope that doesn't come off.  For one 
    thing, for a supposed power back, Wheatley has been awfully injury 
    prone.  Faulk has been more durable.  To be honest, I still haven't 
    heard anything about the pro prospects of Tommy's guy Errict Rhett, 
    and he might be right up there in the scouts' opinions even though he 
    did take the big KOD hit in Saturday's game with FSU.
    
    Right now the Pats probably need the top-notch WR more than the RB but 
    I'm not sure there's a player available who can provide the same
    impact.  It seems that as far as projected NFL success goes, WR is a
    position where sleepers emerge from the draft more than at RB, and can
    be had with lower picks.  J.J. Stokes might be the guy but with a #1 
    or #2 pick you'd better be damned sure of the guy, because unless he 
    turns out to be truly great, the solid single player at WR just does 
    not deliver play-in, play-out contributions that a RB, defensive
    player, or even offensive lineman does.  Still, if he's the choice, 
    I'd rather roll the dice with Stokes as the impact offensive player 
    the Pats so desperately need than trade down (unlike with past
    adminstrations I think Parcells realizes this and has faith in his
    ability to draft talent in the middle rounds).
    
    glenn
    
56.608CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childMon Nov 29 1993 16:2011
 Don't worry Glenn, when was the last time Edlestein was right? Didn't the
 Patriots take Fryar #1? Could be gun shy on Stokes but given the relaxing
 of all the passing rules he should be the pick. Trouble is Parcells still
 thinks like the ancient ones and wants to run.....Also Parcells did it with
 a small back (Joe Morris) and a big back (OJ Anderson) so how can anyone
 say what type of back is his type...one thing for certain it's somebody
 who runs with their head up looking for more yardage instead of bowling
 through there like Russell....

 mike
56.609PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 29 1993 16:2812
56.610CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 29 1993 16:3517
>    
>    Yeah that Russell, what a bum.  He was only able to rack up 120+ yards
>    yesterday and is averaging close to 5 yards a carry.
>

Yeah, but if those 120 yards are all between the 30s, it don't do you
much good.

Besides, he's basically the ONLY back the Patriots have, at least the
only one I've seen.

The Giants, when Parcells was there, tended to have a couple of different
backs, all very capable.  I think he'd like a little bit of depth there....


'Saw

56.611Still need a huge guy who can rush the passerLEAF::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Nov 29 1993 16:3913
    Russell yesterday:  147 yards, 27 carries, 5.4 ave.
    
    Russell hasn't fumbled since the third game of the season, and has
    had some excellent games when Parcells & Co. have let him run the
    ball.  I'd love to see Marshall Faulk, but I'd prefer a big subhuman
    defensive end who could pressure the QB.
    
    With the Pats about $11 million under the proposed salary cap, I would
    think Parcells will go after an experienced safety and wide receiver,
    overpay for them both, and still have enough money to satisfy everyone
    he wants to keep on the current roster (Brown, Coates, Turner, Goad).
    
    NAZZ
56.612PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 29 1993 16:4114
56.613PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 29 1993 16:434
    It really is frustrating watching the Pats pile up the yards on the
    ground only to watch them get stuffed on 3rd or 4th and 1.  Why not
    call one of those plays that got you the 8 or 9 yards to get you to 3rd
    and 1?
56.614CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Nov 29 1993 16:483
>   The Pats are pretty deep at RB with Croom, Turner, et.al.  Heck, they
 
Yea, a coupla real studs there... 
56.615CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 29 1993 16:5115
>    It really is frustrating watching the Pats pile up the yards on the
>    ground only to watch them get stuffed on 3rd or 4th and 1.  Why not
>    call one of those plays that got you the 8 or 9 yards to get you to 3rd
>    and 1?

Situations are different perhaps.


One thing that Parcells really blew yesterday was going for it on 4th
down and putting the punt team in there.  I think he should have just
bellied up to the bar and gone with the offense.....


'Saw

56.616PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 29 1993 16:556
56.617PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 29 1993 16:552
    Parcells is still on his honeymoon in this town.  MacPherson and Berry
    were run out of town despite better performances than this.
56.618CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childMon Nov 29 1993 17:036
if the Russell ran with his head up Mac he'd have had 200 yards....he's
a punishing runner but not a game breaker and a team that can't get into
the endzone needs a gamebreaker...

mike
56.619PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 29 1993 17:155
    His head doesn't have anything to do with it, Mike.  He's doing a good
    job of hitting the holes and picking up the extra yards by running to
    daylight.  He just doesn't have the speed to outrun the defense so when
    they catch up to him he puts his head down and tries to get a little
    more.
56.620CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 29 1993 17:174
So a Joe Morris style runner would complement him and improve the
ground game.....

'Saw
56.621PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 29 1993 17:233
    Didn't say it wouldn't, 'Saw.  In fact I said something very similar a
    couple of replies back.  I just question that another running back
    should be the Pats' No.1 priority.
56.622PARVAX::WARDLE_MTue Nov 30 1993 10:4913
    HAHAHAAHAAAA...the Pats are DEEP at RB???? Haaawwwww
    
    Don't get a chubby over Russell's game on Sunday. I think the weather 
    had alot to do with it. In that weather, even a guy like Nick Bell
    could run for 100 yds.
    
    re: Mike
    
    I heard Parcells on he FAN awhile back. He said he prefers the big
    backs. In fact, he said he wouldn't have drafted Barry Sanders over
    Hampton.
    
    JoJ_NOT
56.623There is too much negativism over the Pats' current stateNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 06 1993 17:1424
                                          
>    The squad of very little talent had 2 Rookies of the Year (one of who
>    was traded and is I think out of football now), a Pro Bowl tightend
>    (who is hardly used as a receiver under the Parcells regime), a #1
>    draftpick at QB, several first round picks in the OL, a pro-bowler
>    (coming off knee surgery) in the OL, and 2 LBs with Pro Bowl
>    experience.  I think the lack of talent on this club is somewhat
>    overstated.
    
    And yet this same team plus Millen, Fryar, Vaughn, et al won just *one* 
    game last year, and looked very very bad in losing most of them.  Adding 
    a rookie QB, no matter how talented, does not appreciably improve that 
    mixture.
    
    In all seriousness, with a totally straight face, I think the Pats have
    played much better than expected this year.  They just haven't won.  I
    expected them to win only 3-5 games but to look much worse than they
    have, especially up against the better teams in the league.  Given the
    choice between playing like a much-improved football team or winning 
    a handful of games, in a rebuilding season I will take the former every 
    time (not that it's impossible to have both...)
        
    glenn
    
56.624CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 06 1993 17:2920
>    
>    In all seriousness, with a totally straight face, I think the Pats have
>    played much better than expected this year.  They just haven't won.  I
>    expected them to win only 3-5 games but to look much worse than they
>    have, especially up against the better teams in the league.  Given the
>    choice between playing like a much-improved football team or winning 
>    a handful of games, in a rebuilding season I will take the former every 
>    time (not that it's impossible to have both...)
        
I agree with Glenn.

Their defense is really starting to develop into a good unit.  That's the
mark of a Parcells team -- the defense comes around first.

The offense will follow.  Offenses are probably harder to get cohesive
anyways....


'Saw    

56.625CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Dec 06 1993 17:3812
I agree with youze guys about the Pats.  I tend to be more of a football fan
than a Pats fan, so I like to think that I have some objecitivty.  I'd have to
say that the Pats have played OK thised year.  The most marked improvement has 
been on the offensive line.  They are blowing out people this year, not pussy 
footing around.

In comparing Bledsoe with Mirer, bear in mind that Bledsoe is playing the 
equivelant of his senior year in college.  Also bear in mind that he has no
real talent at the wide receiver poeition, except Brisby, who has as much to
learn as Bledsoe does.

=Bob=
56.626exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 06 1993 17:5713

  I think that people who aren't Pats fans are confusing frustration 
 with negativity. It's easy to say that you'll take improvement over
 victories when it's not you getting your heart broken every week. I
 fully expect Parcells to take this team places and with Bledsoe at qb.
 That doesn't make watching games like yesterday's any easier. You just
 get the feeling that if we had had one won of all the close games that 
 we've been in, that this team could have built on it and won a few more 
 and have something really positive to take into next year. As it is all
 we have is 11 losses and a rep for being a team that no one wants to play.
 Small consolation if you're a fan and probably if you're a player,too. 
    
56.627CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 06 1993 17:587
I got ya Tommy.  I understand what you're saying....


I'll bet Chip Hilton could say something to make you feel better!


'Saw
56.628CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Dec 06 1993 18:104
56.629Pats to finish 5-11TNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Dec 06 1993 18:1611
    Pats to run table the rest of the year.  Three of last four games at
    home.  No tough ones until Miami last game of season.  Once they win
    their second game, they'll roll through the rest of the schedule, which
    is as follows:
    	
    	Sun. Dec. 12	Cincinnati
    	Sun. Dec. 19	at Cleveland
    	Sun. Dec. 26	Indianapolis
    	Sun. Jan. 2	Miami
    
    NAZZ
56.630Just sell the damn team so they can continue rebuildingMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Dec 06 1993 18:2725
    So how do people feel about next week, realistically a loss next
    week will do more for this team then a win (I think).  Do they
    want the #1 pick, what will they do with it if they do get it.  A
    loss this week means they would have to win 2 more games to not
    get the #1 pick, so Id say its a lock for whoever loses.  You have
    to feel a little better about this team then last years, even if
    they end the year with just 1 win theyve been in all but what 2
    games and could have easily won like 5 or 6 of there 11 loses to
    date.  Yes with winning the close one's come early maturatiy and
    a winning attitude, which is currently missing from this team.  I
    hope the lose this week but then win there next 2 combined with
    Cinncy winning a game so they still get the #1 pick but get the
    taste of victory in there mouth's.  If any of those Free Agents start
    thinking about looking elsewhere they might see the end of the tunnel
    and stay with the pats.
    
    Man does it seem like the pats are constantly have ownership problems
    or what.  I wish orthwein would just sell the damn team to a local,
    K-Corp would elimanate the Team VS Stadium Owner but a new owner
    (local) may push harder for a better stadium.  What are the plans for
    the current stadium if K-Corp does buy the patriots ? How many more
    seats and what other improvements have they promised ?  thanks in 
    advance.
    
    								MaB
56.631PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 06 1993 19:0610
56.632PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 06 1993 19:094
    And to further cloud the ownership position, the NFL has backed off on
    their statement that New England would not move.  They are now saying
    that they would not force a buyer to sign anything to agree to keep the
    team in New England.
56.633how many times have I got to spell it our for you?CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childTue Dec 07 1993 14:126
Mac, when you going to get it through you head that Fryar SUCKS!!!!!!!!!????
Pats are playing possum for next year. They plan to take the Broncos route
to the playoffs (ie: Last place schedule) next year..........

mike
56.634VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesTue Dec 07 1993 15:224
    	Hey Mike, you're wrong about Fryar just like you are about Reeves.
    Face it, Parcells made a mistake letting Irving go.
    
    				/Don
56.635PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 15:3910
    Fryar supposedly didn't want to be in New England last year either.  He
    went on to post his best season as a Patriot.
    
    Keeping Fryar wouldn't have cost the team a thing.  He certainly would
    have given the Pats the consistent deep threat to complement Bledsoe's
    arm.  He also would have been drawing the double team opening up
    opportunities for other receivers.  The wins he might have been able to
    help put up would help put butts in the seats.  He certainly wouldn't
    be hurting the development of younger players (Parcells can do that all
    by himself with his doghouse).
56.636CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childTue Dec 07 1993 15:477
 If Fryar had stayed he'd be in the doghouse too, so the argument is moot...

 how many catches has he ad the last two weeks? A flash in the pan type
 player period end of argument....

 mike
56.637MKFSA::LONGT- 2 days and counting...Tue Dec 07 1993 15:499
>>The wins he might have been able to help put up would help put butts 
>>in the seats.

	Mac, correct me if I'm wrong (like I have to remind you), but haven't
	the Pats sold out all but one of their home games, even without 
	the 'knife juggler'?

	
	billl
56.638MKFSA::LONGT- 2 days and counting...Tue Dec 07 1993 15:515
	I think the only way Fryar could have helped the Pats win some
	of their games is if he is also a field goal kicker.


	billl
56.639PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 15:5510
56.640MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 07 1993 15:573
   The early word is that the Cincy game probably *won't* be sold
  out in time to be televised.
56.641But Well Never no...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Dec 07 1993 16:0812
    I dont have this weeks but you can find 1 or 2 bad weeks for almost
    any receiver.  What did Jerry Rice do VS Dallas ?  Fryar has had some
    very good games this season
    	Week	Rec	Yrds	TD
    	 4	7	103	1
    	 8	4	 41	1
    	 9	4	 82	1
    	10	7	111	1
    	12	4	 97	1
    I think most if not all his #'s would have improved with a Healthy
    Dan Marino for the season...
    								mab
56.642CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 16:1134
>    help put up would help put butts in the seats.  He certainly wouldn't
>    be hurting the development of younger players (Parcells can do that all
>    by himself with his doghouse).


First off Mac, you're as bad about this Fryar thing as ACC Chris is about
Dean.

Second off, let's examine this a little more closely.   You can have
a coach like MacPherson, who's buddy-buddy with all the players, runs a 
country club, and doesn't have a doghouse.  Sounds like that's what you
want.  Only problem was that they didn't win.

Now, you look at a team like Dallas.  (I know, MikeC is gonna get on my
case about this, but it will prove a point).  Jimmy Johnson comes in
and lots of players got into his doghouse, and they ended up right off
the team -- in fact, the Giants even picked up one or two.   His
"team with a doghouse" went 1-15 the first year, and not much better the
next year.

But after a few years, what do you know, the guy with the cemented hairdo
put the Cowboys in the Super Bowl, beating up on that other AFC East
patsy team, the Bills.

So, it looks like a pretty clear choice to me -- go with the guy with the
doghouse...


But, hey, maybe you should have kept MacPherson and Fryar.  I really do
like laughing at the laughable Patriots.....


'Saw

56.643MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 07 1993 16:3510
 >> But after a few years, what do you know, the guy with the 
 >> cemented hairdo put the Cowboys in the Super Bowl, beating 
 >> up on that other AFC East patsy team, the Bills.

    Of course, it doesn't hurt if you can sucker some team into
    giving away some good talent and their draft for years to 
    come for some running back that doesn't fit into your plans
    anyways. 

56.644CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 16:399
>
>    Of course, it doesn't hurt if you can sucker some team into
>    giving away some good talent and their draft for years to 
>    come for some running back that doesn't fit into your plans
>    anyways. 

Thank God PHilly is in the league, eh? 


56.645MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 07 1993 16:422
 Actually, it was Minnesota.
56.646CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 16:4510
>        <<< Note 56.645 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
>
>
> Actually, it was Minnesota.

THAT'S right.  I'd forgotten that.


'Saw

56.647CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childTue Dec 07 1993 17:0515
geez MaiR how convient of you to only have fryar's goos weeks available

	Wk1	6 catches no td
	Wk2	5 catches no td
	WK5	1 catches no td
	wk6	2 catches no td
	wk11	3 catches no td
	wk13	1 catches no td
	wk14	5 catches no td

	wk 3 and 7 were byes and no 100 yard games in any of these other
 weeks listed. Still think he's good?????????

 mike
56.648PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 17:0820
56.649CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 17:2419
>    MacPherson won more games in his first season than Parcells has.  A
>    doghouse is fine when it's warranted.  Seems like all it takes is a
>    twitch of the little toe to land in Parcells' doghouse.  And once
>    you're in there is no way out because Big Bill doesn't like admitting
>    he made a mistake.
    
Yeah, and then he crashed and burned in his second season.

Parcells isn't as bad as you're making him out to be.  Truth be told
all the Pats funs musta figured he come in, work with all the crowd
favorites, including the Knife Juggler, and get in the playoffs first 
time outta the blocks.

Well, as Dana Carvey as George Bush is fond of saying: Na gowwa happen...

Parcells will get the talent he wants, how he wants it, and build it
up how he wants it.  Then he'll start winning games.....

'Saw
56.6507806::ASHEWhile you're gnipping, he's gnopping...Tue Dec 07 1993 17:298
    Oh yeah, I had a question on the end of that game Sunday.
    
    4th and goal at the 1.   17 seconds to go.  Bledsoe keeps and gets
    stuffed.  That play took 17 seconds?  Didn't Pittsburgh have to run
    another play?  Or did they and NBC didn't show it?  Did they just say
    screw it, I don't care? You cain't just take a knee there, you'd get a
    saftety and punt, right?
    
56.651Fryar is a Great ReceiverMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Dec 07 1993 17:3410
    Yes even in those bad games you listed he average about 3receptions per
    game, Fryar is on a Mid 50's pace, and proberbly close to 1000yrds
    receiving and this with a load of offensive talant, with byars, Kirby
    Jackson and Ingram all catching the ball.  Plus Marino's not there. 
    The pats should have held onto Fryar.  How good do I think he is, I
    trade Haywood Jeffries for Irvin Fryar in my FFL.  Jeffries has 6TD's
    to Fryar's 5 but Irvin has 3 100yrd games to Jeffries 1.  And actualy
    Fryar should catch about 65+ balls this year...
    
    							mab
56.652If mab trades for him thaT's good enough for me...CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childTue Dec 07 1993 17:558
I still have a hard time seeing him as great despite your ring endorsement
of trading for him. Let see Mitchell in 4 games had better stats tham Marino
had in 6 and Deberg is 2-1 with a couple of 300 yard passing games thrown
in so I have hard time figuring out how he'd have better numbers if Marino was 
there. 

mike
56.653MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Tue Dec 07 1993 18:0111
    Walt,
    
    I was wondering the same thing.  Bledsoe gets stuffed, and the
    refs don't stop the clock to spot the ball.  Either it is a TD
    or a change of possession, so either way the clock should have
    stopped.
    
    I guess the last seconds ended up in the same place that the 
    final seconds from the Lakers-Piston game did.
    
    Mike
56.654PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 18:027
56.655CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 18:2522
>    
>    No we didn't, but we did expect more than 1-11 at this point in the
>    season.

I didn't. 

But then again, I live through that 3-12-1 season when Parcells first
came to NY.


So, now, all the disappointed Pats fans are clinging to the memory of
Irving Fryar, much like the despondant Captain Queeg in "The Caine Mutiny"
sat there during the Courtmartial, twiddling his little steel balls, and
blubbering about knowing that there was an extra key to the food locker
and that he would have found it if only for his disloyal crew.  He held
on to the hope of that key as if it were his entire sanity made manifest.

Now the Pats fans are clinging to Fryar the same way....


'Saw

56.656PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 18:3711
56.657CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Dec 07 1993 18:3812
they stole my strawberies...

Truff be told, I kinda think that the majority of Pats fans, while not pleased,
realize that even thought the team in 1-10, the future looks bright.  They also
beleive that it will take some time.  I know I can live with it, and I wish that
the Red Sox could wak up to the concept of rebuilding.

As to Fryar, as somebody said before, by the time thye would be contenders, he
would be too old to contribute.  If you are nto going to be a contender, why not
play people who will contribute when you get there.

=Bob=
56.658CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 18:4333
>    
>    Fryar is an example of Bill's darkside.  His my way or the highway
>    attitude.  It showed up in his insistence of sticking with Secules.  It
>    showed up in his sticking with Sisson (he might be right with this
>    one).  And we've seen very little of Pro Bowler Marv Cook in the
>    boxscore for no apparent reason other than speculation that he's not a
>    Parcells type player.

The hype here is all this whining about Bill's "my way or the highway".

Here's a newsflash.  It's that way wherever you go, including Bob Palmers
Brave New World It's Not DEC Anymore It's Digital.  (Got a few interesting
stories about that too, btw).

Bill doesn't like players who aren't willing to work, which is why he
dumped so many of MacPherson's cherished slackers before the season
started.

Pro Bowler Marv Cook maybe hasn't been getting open.  Or perhaps he's
not pancaking people on his blocks.  Or maybe he's been slacking in
practice.   I can't say I've seen enough of them this year to be sure,
because the TE usually figures in a Parcells offense (qv Mark Bavaro).

It could be because he's not a Parcells type of player.  Maybe he's not
hard-nosed enough, maybe he's not a worker.   If that's the case, why
would you want him around?   That was one of the mistakes MacPherson
made -- he was everybody's buddy....

Give it a year or two, then we'll see how much whining about Parcells
there is....


'Saw
56.659CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 18:449
>
>they stole my strawberies...
>

Classic line from a classic movie.....  One of my favorites with an
all-star cast....


'Saw
56.660PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 18:453
56.661PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 18:5221
56.662CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 18:5514
56.663MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 07 1993 18:5729
 >> The hype here is all this whining about Bill's "my way or the highway".

 >> Here's a newsflash.  It's that way wherever you go...

 >> Bill doesn't like players who aren't willing to work,

    Unless of course you're name is Lawrence Taylor and you're a supremely 
    talented linebacker capable of disrupting an offense all by your lone-
    some. Then you can do anything you damn well please including being the 
    one who originated dousing the coach with gatorade after a victory. But
    if you're an unproven player like Scott Zolak, you'd better shut up and
    play the good soldier.

 >> which is why he dumped so many of MacPherson's cherished slackers before 
 >> the season started.

    It's more a matter of not having talent than being lazy. Most of these
    guys weren't of NFL calibre.

 >> Pro Bowler Marv Cook maybe hasn't been getting open.  Or perhaps he's
 >> not pancaking people on his blocks.  Or maybe he's been slacking in
 >> practice.   

    Cook isn't the bruiser that Coates is. Coates is playing quite well and 
    is one of the real bright spots on this team. I don't fault Parcells for
    this at all. My main beef was that he stuck with Secules when Secules 
    wasn't getting it done. That and this offense is more conservative than
    Rush Limbaugh's daddy.
56.664CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 18:5937
56.665CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 19:1031
>    Unless of course you're name is Lawrence Taylor and you're a supremely 
>    talented linebacker capable of disrupting an offense all by your lone-
>    some. Then you can do anything you damn well please including being the 
>    one who originated dousing the coach with gatorade after a victory. But
>    if you're an unproven player like Scott Zolak, you'd better shut up and
>    play the good soldier.

And wouldn't the Patriots have sold their collective souls for LT during
the heyday of his career.....

Zolak couldn't carry LTs jock if he had a specially designed jock carrier
with him.

And even LT figured out along that way that if you worked at it during the
off-season, you got better.

And believe it or not, real life is that way too.  Whether it's music
or software or football, there's always some who are naturals and don't
have to work.


| >> which is why he dumped so many of MacPherson's cherished slackers before 
| >> the season started.
|
|    It's more a matter of not having talent than being lazy. Most of these
|    guys weren't of NFL calibre.

Well, that's what I've thought all along, but what just getting testy.  8^)


'Saw
56.666PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 19:2420
56.667CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 19:2934
56.668CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Dec 07 1993 19:297
Gee, yer right, Mac.  The Pats sip this year, they never should have canned 
Coach Mac.

And the Red Sox are heading in the right direction, ol' Lou Gorman is the 
most brilliant mind in baseball.

Hey, was Amy Fischer an innocent victim too, Mac?
56.669PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 19:3418
56.670DECWET::METZGERAmerica's most beloved game show hostTue Dec 07 1993 19:3610
Actually it's better the past have a lousy record...

There's nothing like finishing last, getting the last place schedule, having a
.500 season and convincing people that the team is on the rise only to have
them get  crushed next year when they play a tougher schedule...

It sets back the rebuilding effort and the fans enthusiasm.....

Metz
56.671MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 07 1993 19:3715
 >> Zolak couldn't carry LTs jock if he had a specially designed jock carrier
 >> with him.

    No doubt about it. That's not even close to the point, though. You're
    telling us that Bill likes good soldiers but LT, aka the Coke Machine, 
    was anything but. I guess being the best player on the planet covers for
    a multitude of sins, eh? He should have given Zolak a shot.

 >> And believe it or not, real life is that way too.  Whether it's music
 >> or software or football, there's always some who are naturals and don't
 >> have to work.

    Gee, really, Ward?
'Saw
56.672PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 19:453
    And in the ongoing saga of Patriot Ownership, it was reported today
    that the St.Louis group that lost their bid for an expansion team has
    contacted the firm handling the sale of the Patriots.
56.673CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 19:5034
Re Cook/Coates.

	Well, I can't give you an answer.  It would appear that Coates
	is getting the job done.  Perhaps Bledsoe doesn't throw to
	Cook.



>    No doubt about it. That's not even close to the point, though. You're
>    telling us that Bill likes good soldiers but LT, aka the Coke Machine, 
>    was anything but. I guess being the best player on the planet covers for
>    a multitude of sins, eh? He should have given Zolak a shot.

Sure does.  Like I said, it's not a perfect world.   LT overcame the Coke
deal, got his life back on track, and I'll take my hat off to him for
that.   He's given me some of the best football entertainment ever.

And it's not like LT just turned it on on game day.  He'd laze off in
camp, but by the time game day rolled around, he was, in his own words,
a crazed dog.

And yeah, I guess if you're the best player on the planet you get a
lot of slack.



| >> And believe it or not, real life is that way too.  Whether it's music
| >> or software or football, there's always some who are naturals and don't
| >> have to work.
|
|    Gee, really, Ward?

You slay me, Tommy.  You really do......8^)

56.674VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesTue Dec 07 1993 19:5011
	Gee 'Saw, remember when the Patriots beat the Oilers in 
Macpherson's first year?  Remember how you were saying all kinds of nice 
things about the coach and the team?  One bad year and suddenly coach 
Macpherson is the football equivalent of Beavis & Butthead?  Now while I'm 
glad the Pats got Parcells let's not forget who was the architect of those 
Giants' Superbowl teams, George Young, and the pretty good job the current New 
York coach is doing.  Parcells is capable of making mistakes and I think he 
made one with Fryar.  And for all you stat geeks chew on this one, 9-3, it's 
the Miami record and the only statistic that Irving Fryar cares about.

				/Don
56.675PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 19:564
56.676CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 20:0041
>	Gee 'Saw, remember when the Patriots beat the Oilers in 
>Macpherson's first year?  Remember how you were saying all kinds of nice 
>things about the coach and the team?  

yeah, well that was a helluva win -- very exciting and everything.


>One bad year and suddenly coach 
>Macpherson is the football equivalent of Beavis & Butthead?  

Hey, Beavis and Butt-head are cool.  And Macpherson ain't a bad guy.
He's better than Handley was.


>Now while I'm 
>glad the Pats got Parcells let's not forget who was the architect of those 
>Giants' Superbowl teams, George Young, and the pretty good job the current New 
>York coach is doing.  Parcells is capable of making mistakes and I think he 
>made one with Fryar.  And for all you stat geeks chew on this one, 9-3, it's 
>the Miami record and the only statistic that Irving Fryar cares about.

George Young AND Parcells.  Left to his own devices, George Young wouldn't
be able to leave his bedroom and would be a Dick Gregory case.   He'd do
about as well in the draft too.   George Young is the one who chose Ray
Handley, and the one who chose Dan Reeves only after he was rebuffed on
his first two choices.   George Young is the guy who was vilified by the
New York press (and rightly so) because he wouldn't even give Parcells
a chance to refuse coming back to New York when he became available
during the coaching search.   I'm not a big George Young fan by any
stretch of the imagination.

Fryar still would not have made the difference for the Pats.  Hell, 
he didn't make the difference even whey they had talent and they were
getting spanked all over the field by the Bears........


'Saw




56.677CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 20:0329
56.678NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Dec 07 1993 20:0618
> And for all you stat geeks chew on this one, 9-3, it's 
> the Miami record and the only statistic that Irving Fryar cares about.
  
    Sure, now that he's hit 30, found God and grown up.  When the Pats 
    were winning, the contract holdouts and off-field problems didn't seem 
    to conflict at all with this great winning attitude in Fryar's mind.  
    I don't understand this hang-up with Fryar.  In essence, the Pats did 
    him a huge favor.  Fryar fans should be happy.  Fryar is now in the 
    situation that he repeatedly stated that he wanted to be in: playing 
    for someone else.  Let's face it; Fryar did not want to be Drew
    Bledsoe's tutor.  In all seriousness, I don't begrudge him any success 
    he may enjoy with the Dolphins.  It'd be nice to see him do something
    memorable in the playoffs, and considering the difference in the team's
    situations it shouldn't make a bit of difference to Pats' fans...    
                        
    glenn
    
56.679PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 20:068
56.680PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 07 1993 20:1021
56.681VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesTue Dec 07 1993 20:257
    	Hey 'Saw is this the same New Yawk press that villified Young when
    he made Phil Simms a first round draft choice?  No doubt about it,
    George doesn't have a clue.  The Midgets would probably have a trophy
    case full of Lombardi hardware if they had Scott Brunner at quarterback
    instead Simms!
    
    				/Don
56.682George Young has AltzhimersCNTROL::CHILDSJ. Elders, you got it RIGHT Babeee!!Wed Dec 08 1993 11:5317
>
>    	Hey 'Saw is this the same New Yawk press that villified Young when
>    he made Phil Simms a first round draft choice?  No doubt about it,
>   George doesn't have a clue.  The Midgets would probably have a trophy
>    case full of Lombardi hardware if they had Scott Brunner at quarterback
>    instead Simms!
    
 
 they did win one with Hoss so I guess it's possible.....


 Cmon Mac put the pieces together. Parcells, conservative offense, run oriented,
 two back one TE offense and the main reason you don't see Cook is cause he
 can't block. He said it so himself when he order a toliet seat. IF you can't
 block you can't play for Bill get use to it. His way or the highway babee...

 mike 
56.683CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 12:0717
> 
> they did win one with Hoss so I guess it's possible.....
>

Yeah, but Simms did most of the work getting them there.....


As to Coates and Cook, I'm betting that Coates is getting open, Cook
isn't....


And as to Fryar stopping the fridge and pass blocking and stuff, you 
just proved my point.   Stop whining about Fryar cause he wouldn't
have made a difference.....


'Saw
56.684MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 08 1993 13:1911
 >> As to Coates and Cook, I'm betting that Coates is getting open, Cook
 >> isn't....
 
    Saw, you seem to be doing an awful lot of *guessing*. You might try 
    actually watching and *then* evaluating instead of automatically
    coming to Bill's defense. It ain't a matter of who is or isn't getting 
    open. If that were it then Cook would be the main man because he's the 
    much better receiver. Plain and simple, Coates is Parcells' type of 
    bruising TE, Cook isn't. 
    
56.685I like BillCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 08 1993 13:4325
    Geez,
    All this grousing about Parcells and his coaching thisa year.
    Didn't we all say it's a long term project? Look at the talent he
    has (has not). This year is gut check, experimentation time.
    The defense is jelling quite nicely. Parcells' plan is in place.
    Patience (cuz we'll all be singing "Meet me in St Louis").
    
    IMO, MacPherson was a stopgap. I liked him but didn't think he
    had what it took to build a powerhouse. His biggest problem
    was Sam the Sham.
    
    Parcells has the history and gonfalons to back him up. Dat's why
    all Jints fans adore him. Why he's the savior of that franchise.
    I was A jint fan when I was a lad and they had to be the most
    lovable underachieving franchise in pro football. In the 50's
    and early 60's they were consistently the best team in football
    and came up with a goose egg (I think). Can you sau Colts, Packers,
    Packers, and Bears?? And that pained me cuz I loved thewm Jints.
    Parcells brought back Giant pride and bagged them a coupla
    champeenships. I say keep at it Bill. Yea he's made mistakes, but
    did anyone seriously think this franchise was going to the Emerald
    City sometime soon?
    
    MikeL
    
56.686CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 13:4656
>    Saw, you seem to be doing an awful lot of *guessing*. You might try 
>    actually watching and *then* evaluating instead of automatically
>    coming to Bill's defense. It ain't a matter of who is or isn't getting 
>    open. If that were it then Cook would be the main man because he's the 
>    much better receiver. Plain and simple, Coates is Parcells' type of 
>    bruising TE, Cook isn't. 

Even when you watch it on TV, you don't seen the entire picture.
You have to be there yourself to see what all of the receivers are
doing.

So, even if I watched every Pats game faithfully, I could still do no
better than guess.

All I'm saying is that you guys are just as guilty of what you're accusing
me of, just on the other side.

I say, "I have to guess that Coates is getting open and Cook isn't" and
you're all over me telling me I'm guessing.   Yet you all profess to know
that Parcells is not calling passes to the TE when Cook is in there.

That's pretty bogus.   On any pass play there are a number of things happening
all at once, and I've never EVER heard a coach or QB talk about a pass
(other than a screen) that is designed to go to one receiver and one
receiver ONLY, except in rare cases.   There's always a primary, secondary
and a safety valve.

So, I think it's kind of ludicrous that Parcells a) has a pass to just
the TE in the playbook and b) he's purposely not calling it when
Cook is in there, becuase, no matter what the effect on the team, he's
out to screw poor Pro Bowl TE Marv Cook, because Cook isn't his kind
of guy.


Of course I'm guessing.  There are so many variables involved, from something
as simple as Bledsoe SEEING Coates better than he sees Cook, to maybe
Coates getting open better than Cook....

If I KNEW for sure what it was, do you think I'd be sitting here, writing
this?  Hell no, I'd be making better money coaching some place, as would
the rest of the "experts" in here....

    
I'll defend Parcells because I've seen what he can do to turn a team
around and produce a champion.    If you guys wanna hang on to the
halcyon days of Coach Macpherson and how wonderful things would have
been with Marv "Pro Bowl" Cook and Irving "The Second Coming" Fryar,
hey, go for it......


'Saw

PS  And I still don't care if Cook was in the Pro Bowl.  If you have
    a guy who's doing the job and possibly doing it better, then what's
    the big whoop?

56.687CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 13:4913
>    Patience (cuz we'll all be singing "Meet me in St Louis").
    
Did anyone see the promos for the Eddie Andelman show on SPORTS Channel?

He was talking about a "trained weasel show" as "Fran Murray gets
legislators lined up in various punt formations".

I was rolling.......


'Saw    


56.688If'n ya cain't laugh at CT who cain ya laugh at? ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 08 1993 13:528
> He was talking about a "trained weasel show" as "Fran Murray gets
> legislators lined up in various punt formations".
    
    After all, they're *your* elected officials, 'Saw... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
56.689CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 14:0515
|> He was talking about a "trained weasel show" as "Fran Murray gets
|> legislators lined up in various punt formations".
|    
|    After all, they're *your* elected officials, 'Saw... ;-)
    
Oh, I know, that's what made it so priceless.


The trained weasels, headed up by that fat pantload Lowell "I love 
fried SPAM every morning" Weicker, and his butt ugly (and I mean
scare the buzzards of a dung wagon ugly) sidekick, Eunice "Living proof
that someone was poking the buffalo" Groark.....

'Saw

56.690Ray Perkins should be getting more flakTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthWed Dec 08 1993 14:1115
    Don't forget that Fryar wasn't released, or left unprotected as a free
    agent.  He was traded to Miami for a #2 pick in 1993 (who turned into
    OL Todd Rucci, a starter until he got injured) and a 1994 3rd round
    choice.
    
    I believe Parcells is developing a team for the long term, not a quick
    fix.  When this team is ready to challenge for a Super Bowl, Fryar may
    be too old to contribute.  (Heck, his kids could be too old to
    contribute the next time the Pats challenge for the Super Bowl!)  My
    only problem so far with Parcells, besides some questionable play
    selection, is his offensive coordinator.  Ray Perkins is a boring loser
    who wouldn't know innovation if it bit him in the arse.  IMO, he is the
    main culprit behind the Pats underachieving offense.
    
    NAZZ
56.691MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 08 1993 14:1740
  >> Even when you watch it on TV, you don't seen the entire picture.
  >> You have to be there yourself to see what all of the receivers are
  >> doing.

     What does that have to do with whether Coates is more of a Parcells
     type TE than Cook is? If you watch on tv you can easily see that
     they are both good receivers but Coates is a better blocker.

  >> So, even if I watched every Pats game faithfully, I could still do no
  >> better than guess.

     Only if you don't know what you're looking at.


  >> I say, "I have to guess that Coates is getting open and Cook isn't" and
  >> you're all over me telling me I'm guessing.   

     Aren't you flat out saying right there that you're guessing?

  >> Yet you all profess to know that Parcells is not calling passes to the 
  >> TE when Cook is in there.

     I never said that. In fact, I don't think anyone did. What I'm saying is 
     that he isn't even playing Cook very much. The guy can catch. He's got a 
     Pro Bowl appearance to prove it. He also led the team in recptions once 
     upon a time. Unless, he's all of a suuden forgotten what enabled him to 
     do those two things, I don't think his receiving ability is the problem.

  >> That's pretty bogus.   On any pass play there are a number of things 
  >> happeningall at once, and I've never EVER heard a coach or QB talk about 
  >> a pass other than a screen) that is designed to go to one receiver and one
  >> receiver ONLY, except in rare cases.   

     Never heard of a quick slant, a swing pass, a screen pass. etc.?

  >> Of course I'm guessing.  

     There's that word again.

56.692Yeh, I was an old Giants diehard tooAKOCOA::BREENWaite Hoyt and Tom UmphlettWed Dec 08 1993 14:2218
    Mike you forgot 1956 when Giants came out in title game in sneakers and
    beat dem bears 56-10.  The Sneakers were worn in another one of the big
    games of that era when snow was deeper and whiter and women were
    prettier and miles were longer....
    
    But I was big charlyconnerlyrotegiffordwebsterlittlemorobustellihuff
    and many others fan including the roosevelts and to borrow a phrase
    from Walt, A Chris Schenkel fan, there I said it.
    
    But somehow those promoting the game understood the concept of drama
    and the whole affair was presented somewhat similar to WWF today as
    opposed to the Gowdy-Sean McDonough-ugh school of boredom
    
    	The they threw the old gang out in 64-65 and at one time had Joe
    Morrison on waivers which was it for me (I didn't know it was probably
    a procedure thing)
    
    And don't forget Yelverton A. Tittle
56.693CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 14:2567
|  >> Even when you watch it on TV, you don't seen the entire picture.
|  >> You have to be there yourself to see what all of the receivers are
|  >> doing.
|
|     What does that have to do with whether Coates is more of a Parcells
|     type TE than Cook is? If you watch on tv you can easily see that
|     they are both good receivers but Coates is a better blocker.

Nothing.  I was responding to the flak about me making an educated guess
as to what it going on.

|  >> So, even if I watched every Pats game faithfully, I could still do no
|  >> better than guess.
|
|     Only if you don't know what you're looking at.

You rarely see the entire play develop and are at the mercy of what 
camera shots you are shown -- as opposed to being in the stadium.


|  >> I say, "I have to guess that Coates is getting open and Cook isn't" and
|  >> you're all over me telling me I'm guessing.   
|
|     Aren't you flat out saying right there that you're guessing?

Use my statement in context. 

But of course I have to make an educated guess.  Just as any of you guys
do. 




>     I never said that. In fact, I don't think anyone did. What I'm saying is 
>     that he isn't even playing Cook very much. The guy can catch. He's got a 
>     Pro Bowl appearance to prove it. He also led the team in recptions once 
>     upon a time. Unless, he's all of a suuden forgotten what enabled him to 
>     do those two things, I don't think his receiving ability is the problem.

Read the replies.  You never said it, but it was said.

|  >> That's pretty bogus.   On any pass play there are a number of things 
|  >> happeningall at once, and I've never EVER heard a coach or QB talk about 
|  >> a pass other than a screen) that is designed to go to one receiver and one
|  >> receiver ONLY, except in rare cases.   
|
|     Never heard of a quick slant, a swing pass, a screen pass. etc.?

Sure.  Note the use of "except in rare cases" and "other than a screen".


|  >> Of course I'm guessing.  
|
|     There's that word again.

Right.  And so are ALL the rest of you.

Fact is, not one of us KNOWS why Coates is getting more PT than Cook,
or why he is chalking up more receptions.

If we did we wouldn't be here having this discussion, we'd be on the Pats
staff, or some other closely related job.

So we're all guessing, or speculating, or whatever you wanna call it....


'Saw
56.694PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 08 1993 14:2713
56.695CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 14:2817
>    
>    But somehow those promoting the game understood the concept of drama
>    and the whole affair was presented somewhat similar to WWF today as
>    opposed to the Gowdy-Sean McDonough-ugh school of boredom
>    

It was new, and not widely accepted as it is today.  In those days, there
was a great disparity between what the offense was paid and the defense
was paid.  The Giants were one of the first teams to have a really 
identifiable defense, from what I understand.


Sean McDonough is quite informative and enjoys a very good reputation
with others in his field.  They all speak highly of him....


'Saw
56.696PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 08 1993 14:3012
56.697CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 14:3013
>    'Saw, would you have been so pumped up about Parcells if Norwood didn't
>    miss that FG?


Without a doubt.   

But, bottom line, Norwood did miss the FG, and the Giants won.  Or does
that somehow diminish the victory?


'Saw


56.698PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 08 1993 14:324
56.699CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 14:3927
>    
>    It certainly does diminish your slams of the Bills.
>

Why?

The Bills lost.   They lost because one of their players didn't get it
done when it counted.  Just like the Giants might have lost if the
tackle had made three yards closer to the goal line, instead of where
it was.

If you win a rugby match because the other teams kicker doesn't get it
through the uprights on a last minute penalty kick or drop goal, does
it diminish your victory?   I don't think so.

The Bills played a good game that day, and came close to winning.  I've
never said they didn't.  Parcells himself said "If we played again tomorrow,
they'd probably win 20-19."   He'd just participated in one of the most
exciting Super Bowls ever.

However, the Bills stunk up the joint the next two years, and played
very poorly....  If they had mounted anything like their effort against
the Giants, the outcomes of one of those two games might have been a little
less lopsided.


'Saw
56.700PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 08 1993 14:4117
56.701PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 08 1993 14:5110
56.702CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 14:5232
56.703PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 08 1993 14:5619
56.704You guys win. The TRUE Patriot Experts....CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 14:5735
56.705This is pointless...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 08 1993 14:570
56.706CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 14:5812
>    
>    I know Mike Childs questioned Parcells.  I don't think "we" did. 
>    Especially now since someone won't allow Parcells to be question now
>    that he is coaching the Pats.
>    

We as in Giants fans.  I questioned him, every Giants fan in Giants
questioned him. 

I'm not disallowing anyone anything.  Do what you like......


56.707CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 14:586
>                     <<< Note 56.705 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
>                           -< This is pointless... >-

No shit.


56.708PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 08 1993 14:593
56.709MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 08 1993 15:074
  It beats the hell out of that hygene discussion. It even beats the hell
 out of that discussion on whether or not baseball players were athletes
 which was even more pointless but Glenn was eating it up with a spoon.
56.710I just see these criticisms as very weak; I'm sorry...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 08 1993 16:1543
 > It beats the hell out of that hygene discussion. It even beats the hell
 > out of that discussion on whether or not baseball players were athletes
 > which was even more pointless but Glenn was eating it up with a spoon.
    
    I'm not trying to discourage it.  I'm just saying that we're not 
    hearing any very substantive arguments that Parcells is failing in
    the job he was hired to do.  We might in the future, but we're not 
    now.  Okay, Parcells is stubborn and evasive.  So what else is new?  
    Okay, so Parcells didn't go along with everyone's expert opinion 
    that an emotional, unprepared kid like Scott Zolak should be rewarded 
    for these shortcomings just the same with a couple of starts when 
    Bledsoe went down (Parcells has said as much in his intentionally 
    indirect way), and that might have cost the Pats a win and it 
    undoubtedly cost the paying customer some entertainment value.  
    Okay, Parcells hasn't cut Scott Sisson in mid-season (on this point 
    Mac is grudgingly conceding that Parcells' patience and compassion 
    *might* be a smart move).  Okay, so Marv Cook isn't catching many 
    balls as Parcells isn't enamored of sacrificing the (previously
    non-existent) running game in favor of some low-impact TE play.  None 
    of this registers even a momentary flutter on my aggravation meter.
    
    Then we have the plus ledger (which also has not yielded dividends;
    not yet):  the Pats have gone from one of the most penalized teams 
    in the NFL under MacPherson to the least penalized in the AFC under 
    Parcells in one year.  Is this the overall "system" at work, or is it 
    coaching?  Were all those guys out of formation and jumping offsides 
    and generally unaware of what they were supposed to be doing really 
    the result of MacPherson's lack of control over the front office?  
    Another one: Parcells is letting the team's future, Drew Bledsoe, 
    learn on the job, right out of the chute.  Many felt that Parcells 
    would never allow a rookie QB to start.  Just another decision that is 
    looking to the future as opposed to preserving someone's Pro Bowl past.
    
    Did the Pats really get a #2 and a #3 pick for Fryar?  I thought it was
    a #7, but maybe I'm getting this confused with the Vaughn or Stephens
    deals.  If that's the case, I count it as another plus.  It's the
    equivalent of the Red Sox trading a Mike Greenwell for a couple of 
    promising young prospects; in other words an excellent idea considering 
    the team's current situation.
    
    glenn
    
56.711ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Wed Dec 08 1993 16:152
    Does it have a motor ? Have a Motor ?
    
56.712MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 08 1993 16:2629
    
 >> I'm just saying that we're not hearing any very substantive 
 >> arguments that Parcells is failing in the job he was hired 
 >> to do.  

    I don't think that's the point. At least it isn't mine.

 >> Okay, so Parcells didn't go along with everyone's expert opinion 
 >> that an emotional, unprepared kid like Scott Zolak should be rewarded 
 >> for these shortcomings just the same with a couple of starts when 
 >> Bledsoe went down (Parcells has said as much in his intentionally 
 >> indirect way), and that might have cost the Pats a win and it 
 >> undoubtedly cost the paying customer some entertainment value.  
   
    This is the only thing that I disagree with. I can see not benching 
    Bledsoe when he's going bad (and he is) because he's your "future"
    but Secules isn't. He's supposed to come in and do the job when the
    starter goes down and he didn't. He failed miserably. We stood to 
    lose nothing by playing Zolak. If Bledsoe goes down for any length
    of time I have no faith whatsoever in Secules' ability to carry the
    load. And why would I? 

 >> Did the Pats really get a #2 and a #3 pick for Fryar?  I thought it was
 >> a #7, but maybe I'm getting this confused with the Vaughn or Stephens
 >> deals.  

    They got a seven from Seattle for Vaughn. I thought that they just got a 
    three from Miami but I could be wrong.
    
56.713CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Wed Dec 08 1993 16:4212
Mac, where were you the past oh, 5-6 years?  Dick McPhearson was a very popular 
guy around here.  The media especially loved him, because he would talk 
tirelessly with them, all the while selling, selling, selling the team.  As
several people have said, his biggest problem was Sam Jankovitch and Victor 
Kiam.  For his first couple of years Raymond Berry was even praised by the 
fans.  It was only in his last year or so that everyone got the idea that 
he was totally clueless.

Once again, the Patriots, possibly for the first time in their hsitory, are
going in the right direction.

=Bob=
56.714CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 08 1993 17:5512
                               
>>Once again, the Patriots, possibly for the first time in their hsitory, are
>>going in the right direction.

>>=Bob=
    
    You're probably right in more ways than one Bobby... Parcells &Co
    build a winner.... about 1200 miles west.
    
    MikeL
    
56.715PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 08 1993 18:266
56.716Just stay in NE....Thats enough to ask for this yearMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Dec 08 1993 18:2820
    I never said the Pats were dumb in trading Fryar, just they could have
    used his skills this year.  If Rucci comes back next year, starts and
    produces plus we get a decent pick with the 4rth rounder this will help
    the rebuild more then just fryar.  I was arguing that Fryar is a great
    WR and why would fryar's # be better with Marino, because he's a better
    QB regardless of what Mitchall or OldMan are doing.
    
    Next Coates, the only thing I question is why didnt they put cook on
    the trading block. Coates has 39 receptions for 455 yrds and 5 TD's.
    Cook last year was 52rec, 413yrds and 2 TD's.  If you figure Coates
    stats out for the season its 52rec for 607yrds and 7TD's !!!! Coates
    is a keeper but they should have tried to trade Cook for Draft picks
    when his stock was up !!!
    
    So the pats have an extra 3rd round pick from Miami, I think there's
    a note in the pats file with what other extra picks they currently
    hold (I dont remember them off the top of my head but think they have
    some others).
    
    							MaB
56.717Draft pick this year is in 3rd roundTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthWed Dec 08 1993 18:347
    From page 179 in the 1993 Pats Media guide, in the draft section
    for 1993:
    
    51. Todd Rucci OL, Penn. State (from Miami, along with a 1994 draft
    pick, in exchange for WR Irving Fryar.)
    
    NAZZ
56.718MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Wed Dec 08 1993 18:356
    If you believe the local papers, Cook was on the trading block.
    
    Not sure if the reason a deal wasn't made  was a matter of not 
    getting any offers, or not liking the offers the Pats got for him.
    
    Mike
56.719Trading deadline in NFL comes way too earlyTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthWed Dec 08 1993 18:5010
    It's really tough to make a deal during the season in the NFL, for
    a couple of reasons.  One of course is the basic conservatism that
    runs throughout the league.  The other is the trading deadline occurs
    between (I think) the 6th and 7th weeks of the season.  The other
    major sports all have their trading deadlines much later, which gives
    you a better perspective on what you need to win and who or what you
    may be willing to deal to obtain what you need.  It would also let you
    react better to filling holes from injury.
    
    NAZZ
56.720CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Wed Dec 08 1993 18:5311
Mac

I don't have time to read old notes files, but my memory is clear that Coach 
Mac was given every benefit of the doubt, every break imaginable in New England.
The comments by 'Saw mostly pertain to the change in atmosphere around the team,
reflectign each coach's methods.  Additionally, these comments are beign made
three quarters of a season after Coach Mac is gone.  I don't recall 'Saw saying
much about Coach Mac when he was here, as I doubt he particularly cared about
the Pats one way or the other.

=Bob=
56.721CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 18:589
>much about Coach Mac when he was here, as I doubt he particularly cared about
>the Pats one way or the other.

And I still don't.

8^)


'Saw
56.722Ahh, why not...CSC32::GAULKEWed Dec 08 1993 19:3410
    
    >> Once again, the Patriots, possibly for the first time in their
    >> hsitory, are going in the right direction.
    
    
     With regards to this year, what direction choices are there?
    
    
    
       
56.723A great receiver should be irreguardless of QB...38728::CHILDSJ. Elders, you got it RIGHT Babeee!!Thu Dec 09 1993 11:554
 I gotta admit Mair your logic never ceases to amaze me....

 mike
56.724Ive seen some of the examples of logic in this notes fileMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Dec 09 1993 13:1617
    How can you say a WR should can be great regardless of the QB ?
    Fryar is having a good/great year with Mia, are any of the NE
    WR doing anywhere near what fryar is doing, I dont have a stat
    list but with all the QB problems in Mia and all the offensive
    weapons they have where does Fryar fall in the AFC Rankings for
    WR's ?  Does anybody have a list for such things.  Also how many
    WR's in the AFC have more TD's then Fryar ?  Look at some of the
    shmucks Fryar had to put up with at QB, Eason, The Short Guy from
    Chicago :-), and then pick any of the last 3 season's QB, none are
    real NFL quality QB's and Fryar still managed to post decent #'s.
    Give him a real top notch QB (and a coach/team like in miami) and
    his #'s will go up.  He will prove over the next 2 season how good
    he is/was, too bad with marino out this year Miami proberbly wont
    make it to the big dance.... But Fryar has a legitamate shot at a SB
    win over the next 2.5 season, not necesarily true with the pats.
    
    							Mab
56.725CNTROL::CHILDSJ. Elders, you got it RIGHT Babeee!!Thu Dec 09 1993 14:118
which side of the argument are you on this time Mair? Sure looks like the last
reply was stating that Fryar doesn't need a great QB. Truth of the matter is
that when you suck as bad as Fryar does it doesn't matter who the QB is....

mike


56.726VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesThu Dec 09 1993 15:105
    	Hey Childs, if the Midgets had a receiver as talented and team
    oriented as IRVING FRYAR during their heyday they probably would have a
    couple of more Lombardi Trophies in the Mara trophy case.
    
    				/Don
56.727PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 09 1993 15:195
56.728Anybody think Pat's are tackling better this year?AKOCOA::BREENBill MonboquetteThu Dec 09 1993 15:3025
    Gee I thought there was an extended discussion of 55-65 Giants - But...
    
    insubit'bly Sean mcd is very well respected by his peers.  My problem
    is what those peers consider excellence and what it comes down to in my
    opinion is excellence=dullness.
    
    Developing drama in a broadcast which Schenkel did and Red Barber/Mel
    Allen did and even Johnny Most did is not part of "excellence" today
    and an announcer who was graded an A+ in that skill but occassional
    mispronounced a name or didn't have a batting av. ready would be
    dropped three levels prior to ever making a network.
    
    I tell you another announcer who S*cks bigtime and that's that phony
    ex-Oakland Raiders coach and all his charts - John Madden
    
    So - there
    
    Oh- On Parcells - I basically agree with your premise 'saw on how we
    just have to have patience with Parcells.  It's a tough gamble for the
    long suffering and if wasn't for things like the penalty improvement
    and ability and willingness to tackle in the secondary it would be
    tougher.
    
    But with coach P you don't see a lot of communication about questions
    like "What happend to Marv Cook?" - 
56.729MKFSA::LONGThe day of reckoning has arrived...Thu Dec 09 1993 17:458
>>team oriented as IRVING FRYAR 

	/er, you been trying some of Mr Saia's drinks or what?  Yunz are
	really getting sickening with this Almighty Irving crap.  It sure
	is a good thing Mac doesn't DWELL on past B'town sports figures.


	billl
56.730CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdThu Dec 09 1993 17:4918
Madden is great.....

McDonough is fun to listen to.  And I like McCarver too.



re Simms throwing to Fryar. 

	Well, I guess Simms has one thing that no Patriot QB has
	(or probably will ever have) and that's a Super Bowl MVP
	for the 3rd best passing game of all time.

	The Patriot fans can only wish that that stiff Grogan
	or Tony Ankle Biter Eason, or Hodson, or Flutie had
	one 100th of the leadership ability that Simms has......


'Saw
56.731And a HeismanPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 09 1993 18:551
    Flutie has more champeenships than Simms so there.
56.732 :*) GENRAL::WADEPull!Thu Dec 09 1993 19:114
    
    	Midget football don't count.......
    
    Claybone
56.733PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 09 1993 19:433
    Parcells was recently asked to confirm NBC's Paul McGuire's report that
    said Parcells wanted a running back in the upcoming draft.  Parcells
    basically called McGuire a liar.
56.734PTOVAX::JACOBIt happened again!!!!!!Thu Dec 09 1993 19:577
    re.733
    
    guess that confirms that they'll take a running back in the firsted
    round then huh??
    
    JaKe
    
56.735lotsa lumps on mondaySPECXN::BROWNReal Men only need 12 bitsThu Dec 09 1993 20:035

	I pity the poor running back they pick #!

  Cadzilla2
56.736PTOVAX::JACOBIt happened again!!!!!!Thu Dec 09 1993 20:248
        <<< Note 56.735 by SPECXN::BROWN "Real Men only need 12 bits" >>>
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                                 |
    re p_name-------------------------------------
    
    But PDP8's are nonexistant nowadays.
    
    JaKe
56.737Pats are on the right track (In NE)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Dec 10 1993 12:3212
    -2 why would you pitty the poor RB that the pats pick.  Look at
    the last 3 or 4 place teams and who has a better OL and is rebuilding
    at a better process/speed then the pats.  This is year #1 in the
    parcell's era.  Ive been buying/reading the usa today and trying to
    read about Faulk, I havnt come accross anyone in the press (in NE)
    that doesnt think he'll go #1 or doesnt think he's worthy of going
    #1.  I think I like the Idea of Marshall running in a pats uniform
    and it looks like the right thing to do.  Now if ownership will let
    them spend Mucho Denero on another #1 pick, signing bonus etc, plus
    Free agency this alone will take a miricle (Again assuming they lose
    this week to the bengals).
    								Dozers
56.738GWEN::ASHEI ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk...Fri Dec 10 1993 12:572
    How many kibbles go with those bits?
    
56.739They still have a place in the worldSPECXN::BROWNReal Men only need 12 bitsFri Dec 10 1993 13:0312
	Re: Jake,


   We still have 8's running typeset shops all over the country. Typesetters
love'm most say they kicks the pant off any of the high powered 11's. In
some applications speed is of little need compared to reliability or ease of
use. I loved working 8's and 11's  never knew what you would find hanging of
the buss with these machines. I've seen everything from Beer bottle makers
to Space shuttle flight simulators. 

  Cadzilla2 
56.740CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Dec 10 1993 13:108
Any machine where you can toggle in the boot routine from the front panel
is a manly machine.  Even the old 11s.

Nothing like hitting "Deposit" and then, ultimately hitting the "Execute"
toggle....


'Saw
56.741how 'bout them paper tapes?HBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropFri Dec 10 1993 13:110
56.742PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Dec 10 1993 13:183
    This year's poor Patriot RB is something like 5th in the AFC in
    rushing.  Pats' rookie RBs have captured 2 Rookie of the Year awards in
    the past 5 years.
56.743SPECXN::BROWNReal Men only need 12 bitsFri Dec 10 1993 13:2317
	Love them toggle in routines.

  I'm working on this 11 at Rice Univ.loading up one of my test routines. This
guy in a white lab coat with a slide rule hanging out comes over and watches
me flippin switches. Then the guy says  " Are you assembling that in your head"
I set and think for a second and say yes I guess so and he walks off.

  Many customers were amazed at the ability of our FE's being able to slam a 
toggle in into their systems blink a few lights, swap a 74H74 and leave with
a smile One of the few jobs I ever had that people would tell you "I hope I 
never see you again" and not have a negative meaning. 

  Cadzilla2     

  PS to the earlier reply about kibbles. You get three nibbles with 12 bits,
 we also used to call 12 bits a chomp since it was a byte and a nibble.
56.744CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Dec 10 1993 13:265
A buddy of mine had a few routines he'd use to make the lights do different
patterns and stuff.   always blew people away.....


'Saw_whose_first_machine_was_an_11/40
56.745Vacuum tubes (aka valves) are manly 'tronicsMKFSA::LONGThe battle is joined...Fri Dec 10 1993 13:306
	Mac, I don't think anyone is saying that Russell isn't good, at least 
	I think he is.  IMO though the Pats could use a swift, break away
	runner to comliment him.


	billl
56.746Will be an intresting weekendMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Dec 10 1993 13:386
    Russell is very good at breaking thru the line, but cant outrun the
    average Linebacker let alone a SS or DB.  A Marshall Faulk can break
    around outside or with a good whole break thru the line and then the
    secondary could be in trouble.
    
    								Mab
56.747PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Dec 10 1993 13:412
    Since you guys don't like me moving notes around, how about moving this
    enthralling discussion about ancient computers over to the Junk Note.
56.748Pro Bowl a possibility for RussellTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Dec 10 1993 13:527
    Leonard Russell is third in the AFC in rushing, with 787 yards.  He is
    only 46 yards behind Seattle's Chris Warren, who is second.  They both
    average 3.7 yards per carry.  Thurman Thomas is first, of course, with
    the currently injured Barry Foster the only other runner within 100
    yards of the top three.
    
    NAZZ
56.749What it comes down to: "best available player"NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Dec 10 1993 14:029
    
    Where does the Patriots' running game rank as a whole, though?  Right
    near the bottom of the league, I believe.  The fact that this situation
    exists at the same time that Russell is 3rd among individual runners
    underlines the need for another option.  So what else is new?  Just one
    more for the wish list...
    
    glenn
     
56.750In the bottom half, but not the bottom quarterTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Dec 10 1993 14:043
    Pats are 9th in the AFC in rushing, 19th overall in the NFL.
    
    NAZZ
56.751Thurman the man this year for Rushing Title and Total YrdsMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Dec 10 1993 14:1913
    Speaking of Rushing it looks like Emmitt will win the Rushing Title
    in the NFC.  With Both Sanders and Ricky Watter scheduled to miss 2
    games, that Leaves Emmitt and the Eric Pegram of atlanta as the top
    2 guys in the NFC, actually Pergram, Bettis and Brooks are all within
    20yrds of each other and roughly 80-100yrds behind emmitt.  What does
    Thruman currently have for yardage and whats his lead in the AFC look
    like ? If pegram repeats his performace VS the 49ers he'll be right up
    or pass Emmitt (for this week).  But dallas is at minny so who knows
    what Emmitt will do.  Thurman has Philly, one of the worst Rush Defense
    this year.  Looks Like Thruman, but Emmitt is actually still in the
    hunt do to injuries to barry (both) and Ricky Watters.
    
    								MairB
56.752PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Dec 10 1993 14:548
56.753Nickname Entry for mfAKOCOA::BREENTim Fox, Tim GoldenFri Dec 10 1993 15:165
    If we draft him can we nickname him "Field" Marshall Faulk?
    
    After Marshall Foch the French AEF commander of WWI
    
    Just a thought
56.754CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Dec 10 1993 15:1812
>    If we draft him can we nickname him "Field" Marshall Faulk?

My guess is that's what Chris Berman will call him.
    

>    After Marshall Foch the French AEF commander of WWI
    
Trivia for the day -- he's interred in the same place where Napolean's
tomb is, in a room off the main room where Napolean is....


'Saw
56.755Just call 'em the Faulking PatriotsCSC32::GAULKEFri Dec 10 1993 16:153
    
    
     
56.756VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesFri Dec 10 1993 16:298
56.757GWEN::ASHEI ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk...Fri Dec 10 1993 16:3110
    Not Marshall Island Faulk of the Pacific?
    Not Marshall Peter Faulk?
    Not Marshall "Gee, do you mind if I ask one more question?" Faulk?
    
    
    I think Peter has to be in the running... 
    
    Here he comes through the line he serpentines to the left and
    serpentines to the right...
    
56.758PTOVAX::JACOBFri Dec 10 1993 18:5517
    
    MAC, if'n ya was to leave RIGHT NOW, ya might be able to WALK to the
    OPP by the 17th, so hit the road.   (8^)*
    
  >>                 -< They still have a place in the world >-


  >>	Re: Jake,


  >> We still have 8's running typeset shops all over the country. Typesetters
    
    I broke into this place fixing 8I's and 8E's and 8M's....we still have
    a few out there, but not many.
    
    JaKe
    
56.759CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Dec 10 1993 18:5912
The light indicator panel from our RPO3 drive (you know, the controller
had like 250 half-height cards....) at my very first job 12 years ago,
is sitting downstairs over my friends desk.

He was the FE who kept it running through thick and thin.  Back in the
days when men were men and boards were fixed with lots o' solder....


Ah, the good old days......


'Saw
56.760PTOVAX::JACOBFri Dec 10 1993 19:076
    An 8I was tons of half heighth cards, too, one gate or so on each card,
    and if ya never trouble shot one, it was a bitch just getting started,
    but once ya learned the way to do it, it was  lot easier.
                                
    JaKe
    
56.761FRETZ::HEISERno I'm really very, very shyFri Dec 10 1993 19:124
    I still think they should evaluate LeRon Johnson's performance in the
    Senior Bowl before going with Faulk.  2K-yard rushers are rare.
    
    Besides, isn't this all for naught if the Pats beat the Bengals this week?
56.762PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Dec 10 1993 20:014
56.763Heath ShulerAKOCOA::BREENTim Fox, Tim GoldenFri Dec 10 1993 20:3111
    that's Heath Schuler and apparently the number 1 choice if he elects to
    play and judging by his performanc vs bc last year a great talent. Now
    if Pat's have number 1 again I would see them auctioning off heath to
    highest bidder - say swapping 1 for 7 plus 2 and 3 but they could miss
    Faulk in that case.
    
    But there is some nfl methodology about where a top running back should
    be drafted vs other skill positions - that theory would have the
    marshall down around 7-10.
    
    Bill
56.764PARVAX::WARDLE_MM. Faulk = Blair ThomasSat Dec 11 1993 17:313
    Wait a minute...I thought the Pats were deep at RB???? Mac??
    
    JoJ_NOT
56.765my .02 on the back thangAD::HEATHHave pitchers and catchers reported yet?Mon Dec 13 1993 09:5816
    
    
      Why all the talk about drafting a back #1 anyway.  I can see that the
    Pats need an outside threat, but with Russell getting 94 yesterday that
    puts him about 120 or so from 1000.  Last stats I saw had him ranked
    2nd behind Thruman for total yardage from scrimage and I think that is
    pretty good company.  This team desprately needs a real wide out with
    breakaway speed that CAN catch the ball (Stokes outa UCLA comes to
    mind) and a dominant pass rushing d'lineman.  They are not going to get
    both but with the salary structure the way it is should be able to
    one of two via FA.  No matter what happens they will still be about 2
    yrs from a playoff team ( a real playoff team not a last place padded
    schedule playoff team like that AFC west team) but a least they seem to
    be trying.
    
    Jerry
56.766remind anybody else of "A Comedy of Errors?"CSTEAM::FARLEYMon Dec 13 1993 12:1217
    
    
    	Yabbut my sides were splitting about the creativity of the Pats
    yesterday when they blew the punt and turned over on their 35 yd. line.
    I ain't Carnac but boy oh boy did I see a "L" on the horizon.
    
    Great Defense
    
    Great strategy to go for the safety
    
    Wuzz it dumb to get the win and probably lose the #1 pick?
    
    I remain,
    if nothing else, getting enjoyment from the Pats - especially in the
    4th qtr.
    Kev
    
56.767PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 13 1993 13:128
56.768MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 13 1993 14:1114
    Parcells is on record as saying that running back is one of the
   deepest positions in the draft when asked if he would take Faulk
   with the number one pick. He's obviously hinting that he wouldn't
   take Faulk first but he faked alot of people out last year when
   he played it close to the vest. All that may be moot after this 
   weekend because we might not get the number one and probably won't
   because there are three very winnable games left on the schedule.
   Winning two of those games would put us out of it. Then again
   just about *every* game on the schedule has been winnable so who 
   the hell knows. The two underclassmen that I really like are Dan 
   Wilkinson from  OSU, who has forced offenses to double and triple
   team him all season long, and JJ Stokes from UCLA, who looks like a 
   Michael Irvin clone only a little bigger and a little faster. 
56.769FRETZ::HEISERno I'm really very, very shyMon Dec 13 1993 14:245
    He could also draft Faulk and use Russell for trade bait for a deep 
    threat.  
    
    BTW - Stokes is a junior and I haven't heard any rumblings about him
    declaring.
56.770or he could.....CSTEAM::FARLEYMon Dec 13 1993 14:2714
    
    
    	Yabbut has a field goal kicker ever been drafted #1?
    
    I had a revelation on the way in today.  It said that the Pats need
    a field goal kicker *for games*!  They already have one for practice
    sessions.
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    glad I'm not Scott Sissons......
    Kev
    
56.771MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 13 1993 14:428
    
  >> BTW - Stokes is a junior and I haven't heard any rumblings about him
  >> declaring.

     I know, Mikey. That why I said "The two *underclassmen* that I really 
     like..." I don't expect we'll hear anything from these guys until after 
     bowl day but this is a thin draft this year and it might be to their 
     advantage to come out this year. 
56.772AKOCOA::BREENDJ, Harmon WagesMon Dec 13 1993 14:4413
    First let's hope that Patriots don't even draft in top 4, at least I'd
    like them to beat Jets and Dolphins.
    
    Parcells seems to be the type to just draft the best player especially
    since pat's have needs everywhere.  But I could see him trading down
    but if he does so I hope he does better than Singleton and Agnew for
    Cortez (that was the case a few years back, right?)
    
    The team I just can't believe in is the Giants but they are sure
    proving me wrong - the presence of LT must simply make the entire team
    better
    
    Bill
56.773a quote from a Cincy newspaperWKRP::LEETCHU.S. Messaging Practice, CincinnatiMon Dec 13 1993 14:482
"It was one of those classic games where it was a shame that one team had to
win"
56.774huh?CSTEAM::FARLEYMon Dec 13 1993 14:5212
    
    
    	Yabbut Bill,
    
    	Please explain why you don't want the Pats to pick in the top 4.
    
    mindlessly inquiringly and all that......
    
    I remain,
    like Commander Data, confused by that
    Kev
    
56.775It's better to watch a winner than a loserPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 13 1993 15:044
56.776GWEN::ASHEI ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk...Mon Dec 13 1993 16:392
    I thought I read somewhere that Lohmiller was a #1 pick...
    
56.777I'm with Mac' on this oneAKOCOA::BREENDJ, Harmon WagesMon Dec 13 1993 16:399
    Yeh, what 'mac said.   As a fan I'm a bit of a diehard, eternal
    optimist type and as a rule will always root for the underdog, so pat's
    are right up my alley.
    
    And I should have said beat the colts as they've already dropped two to
    the jets.
    
    There's no draft choice in history which whould suffice for a victory
    over Miami.
56.778TNPUBS::ALVEYPoofter's Froth, Wyoming plans aheadMon Dec 13 1993 17:073
wasn't Russell Erxleben (sp?) of Texas a first-rounder?

dr.a
56.779(8^)*PTOVAX::JACOBMon Dec 13 1993 18:467
    I gots a question on the "STUPOR BOWL" that was played yesterday
    between the Patsie and the Bungholes, with a score like 7-2, were there
    any home runs, doubles, triples?????  What was the line score on the
    runs hits and errors???????
    
    JaKe
    
56.780DECWET::METZGERAmerica's most beloved game show hostMon Dec 13 1993 18:4817
I'm pretty sure that he was. Even got on the cover of SI before the draft
talking about how great he was...never made it in the pros though...supposedly
he had a tough time adjusting from the tee they used in college to the pros
where you kick off the surface....

The pats are better off picking up some cast off from another club or  signing
a kicker as a free agent instead of wasting a draft choice on one. Rare is the
case of a Jason Hanson or a John Casey that kick as well as billed out of
college...the Greg Davis story is more typical (get cut froma bunch of teams
until you stick with one and become a serviceable kicker..didn't he play for
the Pats one season?)

If Dallas can pick up an Eddie Murray than the Pats should be able to get 
somebody decent....

Metz
56.781GWEN::ASHEI ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk...Mon Dec 13 1993 18:512
    Clemens had a shutout until they brought in Russell who blew it...
    
56.782MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 13 1993 18:598
  I thought John Lee from UCLA went in the top three rounds one year.

   As for Sisson, I wouldn't bail on him anymore than I'd bail on Bledsoe.
  The kid is young, he's obviously talented and it's not like he's costing
  us a playoff spot. If the offense could score touchdowns it'd take a hell
  of a lot of pressure off of the kid. Chances are though, that they'll cut
  him and he'll catch on with someone else and have a good career.
56.783IF the redskings get anybody theyll be tough again next yearMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Dec 13 1993 19:0511
    Is scott sisson the next Nick Lowery :-)
    
    In a few years maybe Sisson's box scores will resemble Lowery's.
    I know one thing for sure if the Pats cut sisson he'll turn out
    great ;-).
    
    The pats blew it this week, Faulk is worth more then a win over
    the Hapless Bengals.  IF the Pats tie Wash, what would the 1st
    tie breaker be between the 2 clubs (Assuming wash doesnt win again
    and NE beat indy only), Thanks in advance.
    								mab
56.784CSTEAM::FARLEYMon Dec 13 1993 19:064
    
    Yabbut there was also a unforced error late in the 4th inning.
    Almost allowed the C's to tie the game.
    
56.785kickers in first round?HBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropMon Dec 13 1993 19:0916
re: Erxleben (sp?)

I think that Erxleben from Texas, Tony Franklin from Texas A&M, and a guy
from Arkansas (Steve Smith?), who were place kickers in college, were all
taken in the firsted round of the draft.

A while back someone (ESPN?) did a special on them and the pressures of
placekicking. Erxleben ended up punting for Miami I think. Franklin went
to the Eagles and was the only one to end his career place kicking. The
other guy evidently couldn't even handle the pressure of being drafted
went on a suicidal binge and ended up paralyzing himself in a wreck while
intoxicated.

Anybody know who the Arkansas guy was? 

TTom
56.786The golden age of kicking, courtesy of the SWC...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 13 1993 19:297
> Anybody know who the Arkansas guy was? 
    
    I think his name was Steve Little, not Steve Smith...
    
    glenn
    
56.787GWEN::ASHEI ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk...Mon Dec 13 1993 19:312
    Back when kicking on a tee was legal...
    
56.788yepHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropMon Dec 13 1993 19:585
Thanks Glenn.

Definitely Steve Little. Is he still alive?

TTom
56.789but I asked about the #1-not first roundCSTEAM::FARLEYMon Dec 13 1993 20:021
    
56.790QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Dec 13 1993 23:335
      The patsies don't deserve another #1 pick, or even in the top 10.
    For crying out loud,  they have been in line of getting top picks for
    years,  and look what its done for them.
    
      Tim
56.791FRETZ::HEISERno I'm really very, very shyTue Dec 14 1993 01:371
    I thought that was the Sacramento Kings.
56.792VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDThe Few, The Proud, The 1%Tue Dec 14 1993 15:506
    	Kudos to the Foxboro Stadium security for removing the "Home of
    Missin' Sisson" sign last Sunday.  It's these kind of criminal and
    degenerate acts that negatively impact what we're there for... to get
    drunk and start fights.
    
    				/Don
56.793Litigation, USACTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Tue Dec 14 1993 15:582
The couple who brought the sign in are suin' the 
Patriots.  Makes sense to me.
56.794Glob interview of RI couple todayAKOCOA::BREENDJ, Harmon WagesTue Dec 14 1993 16:1114
    From what I've read the Patriot's security has blown it big time.  From
    what I've read about the sign holders they might be willing to accept
    an apology but if they decide to sue they will be able to expand their
    season ticket area.
    
    Interesting all the lies that security have [allegedly] telling about
    the incident, including the most damaging if true falsehood, that the
    couple were swearing at cops since the guy is a notary, process-server
    in RI and the slander would damage his reputation.
    
    The "real" police appeared to act very professionally, the alleged
    misconduct appears to be on the part of stadium security.
    
    The new St Louis owners may have to beware ...(I think I'm kidding)
56.795VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDThe Few, The Proud, The 1%Tue Dec 14 1993 16:175
    	From what I've read the couple weren't drunk, weren't starting
    fights and weren't leering at the cheerleaders.  They deserved to get
    tossed!
    
    				/Don
56.796Rev 2.0?CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Dec 14 1993 17:1013
    
    
    	Yabbut speaking of miss'n Sissin :^)
    anybody catch the new MacDonald's commercial?  I only caught a bit of
    it but the words, "Over the wall, through the window....." were there.
    
    At the end the final shot was 2 guys standing on a blimp with a
    footsaball.  Who are these guys?  What are the lines?
    
    I remain,
    thinkin Air_Mikey was in it too
    Kev
    
56.797GWEN::ASHEI ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk...Tue Dec 14 1993 17:184
    You missed Michael in there saying "these guys are good (CHOMP)"...
    They're Pete Stoyanovich (Dolphins) and Chip Lohmiller (Washington
    un-PC team).
    
56.798PTOVAX::JACOBI'm Santa Claus!Tue Dec 14 1993 18:589
    
    >>They're Pete Stoyanovich (Dolphins) and Chip Lohmiller (Washington
    >>un-PC team).
    
    I liked the line on MNF lasted night after Stoyanovich missed a FG,
    they said Lohmiller was probably on his way to get his Big Mac.
    
    JaKe
    
56.799MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 14 1993 19:016
    
  >> I liked the line on MNF lasted night after Stoyanovich missed a FG,
  >> they said Lohmiller was probably on his way to get his Big Mac.
    
     Ayuh, that's a real knee-slapper.    
    
56.800da ninj's speculationCSTEAM::FARLEYWed Dec 15 1993 16:3531
    
    
    	Yabbut so while chatting with the Ninj, naturally, the subject of
    the Patriots "4-Sale" situation came up.  Ninj said that he hoped
    they'd stick around because in addition to keeping his job, he'd be
    able to travel with the team nexted year to Toronto for a_exhibition
    game.  Seems that since the Pat's would be the home team, he, as the
    teams official head <mumblefratz> would be working it.  He thought
    that he and Susan would use the trip as a vacation & maybe stop off in
    Syracuse to see Coach Mac.
    
    	Ninj sees the "4-sale" like this:
    
    Firsted, he said that Orthwein doesn't care who he sells the team to.
    
    If he sells it to a St. Louis group who tries to move the team, Kraft
    will sue the Pats.
    
    If he sells it to a St. Louis group who doesn't try to move the team,
    Kiam will sue the NFL.
    
    If he sells it to Kraft, he doesn't think anybody will sue, as long as
    Orthwein gets his money.
    
    anyway, it was shirley good to chat with him.  Hope he makes it on
    Friday.
    
    I remain,
    reporting like from MRO
    Kev
    
56.801PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 15 1993 17:038
56.802MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Wed Dec 15 1993 17:078
    From what I've read, Kiam is only threatening to sue if the team is
    sold and moved to another city.  He claims the NFL refused to allow 
    him to do so.
    
    If Orthwein moves and keeps the team for himself, I not sure what
    Kiam will do.
    
    Mike
56.803CAPNET::LEFEBVRENature bats lastWed Dec 15 1993 17:074
    Cuz the league wouldn't let him move the team/break the lease, thereby
    "forcing" him to sell the team at a well-below market price.
    
    Mark.
56.804CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Dec 15 1993 17:4012
    
    If Orthwien keeps the team and moves it, then the Krafts sure for
    breaking the lease.  Vic Kiam does nothing under this move.
    
    
    hth
    
    I remain,
    thinking  the Pats ownership situation might make for a good daytime
    soap
    Kev
    
56.805VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDDrew &gt; Vinny &gt; BernieMon Dec 20 1993 15:349
    	Figures.  Just when the Pats start to look like a team they'll head
    off to Saint Louis.  Eddie Anvilhead blames the NFL and says no to the
    SissyPlex (his land holdings around the stadium have nothing to do with
    this stance) and Will the Shill blames Orthwein and pleads us to call
    our state representative and beg him to open our wallets and build the
    impoverished new prospective owners a brand spanking new SissyPlex.
    UGH!
    
    				/Don
56.806CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Mon Dec 20 1993 16:597
It looks like a basic for-certain, done-deal that the megaplex bill will
die on the floor of the house before the session ends.  It is doubtful 
it will even come up for discussion.

Not that it matters, there is no way it would/will ever pass.

=Bob=
56.807Hey Andleman - can you say "Conflict of Interest"?TNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Dec 20 1993 18:005
    Of course Eddie is against the megaplex - he owns the parking lots
    around the stadium!!!  He'll be making zero dollars if a megaplex
    gets built in Boston.
    
    NAZZ
56.808I dunno; there's 100+ acres there ready to be dozed...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 20 1993 18:1719
    
>    Of course Eddie is against the megaplex - he owns the parking lots
>    around the stadium!!!  He'll be making zero dollars if a megaplex
>    gets built in Boston.

    On the other hand, I have heard both Bob Kraft and Andelman say that 
    the land around Foxborough is worth more for the usual Rte. 1 strip mall
    development than it is for parking cars 10 times a year.  Because 
    we're talking about a lot of land if the stadium comes down completely, 
    it seems believable.  In an article in the Globe a while back Kraft was
    quoted as saying that he wasn't completely against the idea of a
    megaplex, if his interests were to be taken care of (I think mainly if
    he were to be able to buy the Pats).  I'm even somewhat skeptical that 
    he couldn't be bought out by the St.Louis interests if the price were
    right, althought Kraft does seem to be a decent guy who's sincere in
    his desire to buy the Pats...
    
    glenn
    
56.809SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesTue Dec 21 1993 13:307
	I personally don't trust Kraft either. I think Kraft's ultimate plan
is to buy the Patriots. Make us tax payers build a Megaplex. Move the
Pats into the Megaplex. Then rip down Foxboro stadium and lease the land
to developers. So he keeps on making mucho bucks.

Ron
56.810CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Dec 28 1993 12:227
    Break up this new NFL juggernaut..
    
    Will be nice watching the Pats harpoon the FrozenFish to end their
    season.
    
    MikeL
    
56.811METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Dec 28 1993 13:267
9000 tix are still unsold for Sunday. Fortunately the cold weather is
supposed to continue. Hopefully that means the Pats will not sell out
the stadium and then Giants-Cowboys will be on at 1PM.

The Crazy Met

btw - for this Sunday, Go Pats!
56.812VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolTue Dec 28 1993 15:0916
    	Hey Leary, like I said we'll be in Kritzie's parking lot around
    10:30 and bring your longjohns.  The halftime show was a hoot.  Toys
    (BackwardsR) Us lumped a whole bunch of toys at midfield and had a
    contest for these little (no one looked older than 7) kids to see who
    could get the most.  The poor tykes were freezing, but that pile of
    gifts presented a dilemma for them (survival or presents).  Toys
    (BackwardsR) Us also brought a real life Barbie onto the field.  Now
    with the wind gusting up to 25-30 MPH and Barbie having one of those
    hooped skirts on I knew it was only a matter of time before we got a
    Marilyn Monroe shot.  Unfortunately Barbie had on a pair of longjohns
    and heavy duty ski boots.  8^(  The only problem with the Pats winning
    this Sunday is that it will prolong the playoff hopes of the Jesters
    (until around 21:00-21:30 on Sunday night when the Oilers have a 28-0
    lead).
    
    				/Don
56.813CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Dec 28 1993 17:1415
    Yo Slash,
    I'll bring the Bushmills if you bring the flamethrower. We can
    have molotov cocktails on the barbie. Kritzie's it is. Ah cain't
    wait to see dipstick Shula snarlin' and chatterin' away at the
    refs as his playoff hopes go up in smoke as the Patsie's beach
    the 'phins.
    
    Er, is the post-game apertif soiree still en vogue? Black tie or red?
    
    MikeL
    
    P.S. Ah'll bring some canned Japanese tuna to the tailgate. Ya know
    there's gotta be some dolphin in that can...8^)
    
    
56.814VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolTue Dec 28 1993 19:297
56.815MKFSA::LONGI know a survivor!Tue Dec 28 1993 20:006
	Hey, MikeL, speaking of pool winnings....what ever happened to the
	prize I was supposed to get for being the closest to guessing the
	score in the ND-FSU game?


	billl
56.816METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Dec 28 1993 20:124
you didn't really expect an ND fan to give a prize to a "non-believer", 
did ya?? :-)

The Crazy Met
56.817dadgum infernal mailCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Dec 28 1993 23:5713
    Now hold on a sec boys.
    
    Billl, ah did mail ya the "prize" via Decsnail, hail gotta be
    close to a month ago. Check your infernal mail.
    
    Lissen, oh Bellevue-one, ah done mailed you the copy of the
    Boston Globe (remember the one that had BC all over it) whence
    BC beat ND... via snailmail, Did ya git it?
    
    I remain,
    not trusting our version of Pony Distress
    MikeL
    
56.818does this guy work for Pulishers Clearing House?MKFSA::LONGI know a survivor!Wed Dec 29 1993 11:169
	"The checks in the mail."

	Sheesh, never heard that one!  It's really ok, MikeL, I forgot about it,
	too.  I was kinda looking forward to reading the book, though.....
	Whaddaya mean, the prize isn't a Lou Holtz autographed copy of "Under
	the Tarnished Dome"?!?!?!?


	billl
56.819VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolWed Dec 29 1993 12:3410
56.820CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Wed Dec 29 1993 13:2420
re .819

Rat on!  

Although I'm not as rich as you Slasher, so I cain't afford season tics, I agree
that the SisyPlex would turn a team with potential into a bunch of pansies.

Speakin' of the elements, I was watching hightlight of the Packers game Sunday,
in which they clenched a playoff birth (go Pack).  They said it was the second 
coldest day that they have ever played in Labeau Field (we all know what the 
coldest on was).  I was amazed to see that, despite this, Sterling Sharp was 
playing with bare arms!  I then began to notice on the hightlight from all the 
cold weather places, and this was prevailant among receivers and  o-linemen.  
I thought back to the ice bowl game, and remeber all the players wearing many 
layers of long sleeves.  In fact I remember reading in "Instant Replay" that 
the o-linemen would cut their longjohns off at the knee so they wouldn't 
hamper their movement, but other than that, piling on the layers.  Could it 
be that football players are tougher now?  Nah, must be the steroids.

=Bob=
56.822The state legislators 8^)=convention centerCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 29 1993 13:361
    
56.824Needs a dome that cain support real grassCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 29 1993 14:1112
    Actually the key selling point fer the Megaplex is not the football
    stadia but the "potential" of conventions which would garner the
    buckeroos, kinda like Indy and Texas stadia. Much debate over
    the wisdom of banking on potential conventions to hep pay for itself.
    
    However if the Megaplex is approved ( I really think it ought to be
    considered) they oughtta be smart and obtain enuf adjacent land upfront
    jest in case the BoSox decide to cash in.
    
    JMHO
    MikeL
    
56.825METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Dec 29 1993 15:208
Yes MikeL I did get the copy of the Boston Globe that you
sent. Thanks.

The Steelers in onf their Super Bowl years played a playoff game in freezing
weather. The defense played in short sleeves to intimidate the opposition.
Guess since then everyone has been doing that.

The Crazy Met
56.826VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolWed Dec 29 1993 15:2612
56.827VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolWed Dec 29 1993 15:3911
56.828METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Dec 29 1993 15:495
Hey =Bob= nice to finally see you in this notesfile. Last week you
promised to keep things going in here and then you go and blow off
yesterday. Some people! :-)

The Crazy Met
56.829CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Wed Dec 29 1993 16:3212
re .828
I done mah best Met, but my clients (like that guy Leary) are keepin' me kinda 
busy.  Yesterday was an exception, when the grip that beseiged the 
McCullough-cluster headed in my direction.  Still kinda got it, so don't get too 
close to this note when younz read it.

Panty hose don't sound too mainly, but if it works.  I suppose it is hard for
d-linemen to grab a hold of the hose when doing the hand-to-hand thang that goes
on with the line these days.. But then again, this is from a guy who wears 
tights to run in during winter.

=Bob=
56.830Pshaw Slash 8^)CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 29 1993 17:2716
    Why Slash,
    These rich corporate execs don't have to take their mistresses.
    There's plenty of young local ladies willing to meet cross-sections
    of the American male. Good healthy restaurant dining, theatre,
    etc.. Why don't you remember the throngs of civic-minded young
    ladies who flocked to Faneuil Hall area when the Navy and Tall Ships
    were in? What a way to show the world Beantown's hospitality!
    Why the highlight of the Tall Ships weekend was busloads of patriotic
    young lasses from Leominster/Fitchburg to enrich Boston with their
    special CMASS culture. 
    
    And ah heard the new Megaplex might be the sweepstakes winner for the
    1999 Final Four!
    
    MikeL
    
56.831any updateMETSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Dec 29 1993 18:044
so how close are the Pats to selling out the stadium for the Miami game on
Sunday??

The Crazy Met
56.832move not finalHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropThu Dec 30 1993 15:0940
Article: 7280
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.massachusetts
Subject: Patriots owner: Sale is not final
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 93 17:32:07 PST
 
	FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- New England Patriots owner and Chairman James
Orthwein said Wednesday that it is not too late to keep the team in New
England, but a new stadium would be needed to entice local buyers.
	There has been speculation that one of the cities that lost out in
the recent expansion process -- St. Louis, Baltimore or Memphis -- will
try to entice a current NFL team to relocate. The league recently
awarded expansion franchies to Charlotte, N.C., and Jacksonville, Fla.
	``I have read the press reports relative to Governor (William) Weld's
statements today to the effect that there is a 'possibility' that the
New England Patriots will be sold early next month to an out-of-state
operation. While the sale process, which began in September, is ongoing
and near a conclusion, I want to state categorically that no decision
has been made to sell the franchise to any group at this point,''
Orthwein said.
	``The franchise has been for sale. There is nothing new to that. For
many months now I have been saying that without a long term resolution
to the venue situation, it is unlikely that a local buyer could pay a
fair market price for the team in New England and capitalize and operate
a competitive NFL franchise.
	``Clearly, Governor Weld has been a strong supporter of the Megaplex
and understands its tremendous year-round benefits to the community, not
just the 10 times a year the facility would be available to the
Patriots. I remain hopeful that the situation will be resolved in
everyone's best interest,'' Orthwein added.
	Orthwein reportedly has warned the NFL that he would take legal
action if the league interferes with the sale of the Patriots.
	The Boston Globe reported early in December that Orthwein sent a
letter to NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue claiming he has no agreement
with the league to keep the team in New England. Orthwein added that the
league would violate anti-trust rules if it tried to keep him or a
potential buyer from moving the team.
	Tagliabue has stated that Orthwein signed an agreement stating that a
vote of approval from the other team owners would be needed in order for
a team to move.
56.833VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolThu Dec 30 1993 15:4513
    	I just can't figure this thing out.  Didn't Kraft say that if
    anyone tries to move the team he will have the Federal Bankruptcy Court
    file an injunction against it?  Isn't this an ironclad lease?  Is
    Orthwein and/or the St. Louis group getting bad legal advice?  Is there
    in fact a loophole out of the lease?  Or is Orthwein such a rich mama's
    boy that he's never had anybody say "no you can't do that" in his whole
    life?  Is it that the entire NFL wants to ignore the fact that
    because the Sullivan's messed up royally the Patriots' fate is sealed
    for another 9 years?  After the year 2002 the Patriots can go anywhere
    they want, to St. Louis, to a SissyPlex, anywhere.  But until then
    they're stuck, or somebody pays Mr. Kraft lots and lots of money.
    
    				/Don
56.834CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Thu Dec 30 1993 16:0412
Troof be told, I suspect that Orthwein doesn't give a rat's ass who he sells
the team to.  His goal is to position the situation such that no buyers will be
scared off.  There is no clear cut reason why the new owners can't move the team
to another city (Orthwein has straight armed the commissoner to back off, and 
thus doesn't need league approval), move the team to a Sissyplex, or keep the 
team in Foxboro.  Orthwein isn't making as many statements these days, and is
waiting for the folks at Goldman-Sachs to tell him who the highest bidder is.

Meanwhile, what will all those suddenly unemployed Patriot Cheerleaders do to 
make ends meet if the team moves?

=Bob=
56.835VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolThu Dec 30 1993 16:1413
    	=Bob=, a Federal Bankruptcy Court judge can tell everybody the NFL,
    Budweiser, WalMart what to do.  And unless I've read wrong Kraft has an
    ironclad lease that GUARANTEES the Patriots play all their home games
    in Shaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium until 2002.
    
    	With regards to the cheerleaders, I've already spoken to them about
    taking their show on the road, kind of like the Baltimore Colts Band
    does now.  Course instead of playing at football games I'm trying to
    convince them to put a little more adult sophistication into their act
    to make it more marketable and give them flexibility as to where they
    "perform".
    
    				/Don  
56.836CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Thu Dec 30 1993 16:3510
The lease is what makes things so confusing.  I heard a Dook Univ. law professor
on Dale Arnold's show earlier in the week, and he was saying that the lease
has a covenant that requires that the team perform at the stadium 10 days a year
for the duration.  This covenant is what would allow a judge to force the new
owners to abide by the lease.  I dunno, awfully complicated.

Keep up the good work with the cheerleaders, Slash.  I'm glad that somebody has
their best interests t heart, and is looking to forward their careers.

=Bob=
56.837no surprise hereHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropThu Dec 30 1993 17:044
The lease is only as good as the lawyers defending it versus the lawyers
trying to get outta it.

TTom
56.838Pat's last game in New England is Sunday - don't miss itAKOCOA::BREENThu Dec 30 1993 17:2010
    I am becoming wary of Orthwein packing and moving this team in early
    january after the legislature kills the plex bill.
    
    Or considering that the primary value of the team is the franchise
    contract and the player contracts, he can sell these and let the new
    owner worry about helmuts, tackling dummies and barbells.
    
    The new owner just simply starts selling tickets and lets Orthwein deal
    with the lawsuits with the 200 million he received for the team.  And
    these suits can be handled by the promise of a quick expansion entry.
56.839CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Thu Dec 30 1993 17:2613
56.840This baby is over! - I hear singing, do you hear singing?AKOCOA::BREENThu Dec 30 1993 17:3410
    Right Bob, and what exactly can they do to the new owner in court
    except ask for money.
    
    The new owner in St. Lou or Memphis just tells Vincent,Drew,Andre etal
    to show up this July prepared to play in new gear.
    
    At what point can Kraft, town of Foxboro, whoever actually restrain
    someone since they no longer will do it in Mass.
    
    
56.841VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolThu Dec 30 1993 17:426
    	A federal bankruptcy court has jurisdiction outside of the state of
    Massachusetts.  I've read where Kraft could stand to make over 150
    million dollars in damages if the team is moved now.  That's more than
    it would take to buy the team!
    
    				/Don  
56.842CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Thu Dec 30 1993 18:059
What Slasher said!

Actually, that's why it's so muttled.  It would seem that legally, that Kraft 
et al. are all set.  It's just the spector of the legal battle that makes things 
confusing.

This one has a long way to go.

=Bob=
56.843federal bankruptcy court implications?AKOCOA::BREENThu Dec 30 1993 19:117
    >       A federal bankruptcy court has jurisdiction outside of the state
     
    You may have a point if a bankruptcy court is still involved.  Is this
    from Kiam's going into receivership?
    
    This facet of the business hasn't been explained in my readings and
    listening but it does modify my previous note (possibly).
56.844CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Jan 03 1994 11:447
GREAT game for the Pats yesterday, knocking off the fish.

Let's see, that means that the Pats finish off at 5-11.  Not bad for 
Parcells first year.   It's better than the 3-12-1 he had with the Jints.


'Saw
56.845MKFSA::LONGI know a survivor!Mon Jan 03 1994 12:384
	The Steelers and all their fans thank them, too.


	billl
56.846PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 03 1994 15:1613
56.847why can't we get players like that?OUTSRC::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyMon Jan 03 1994 16:441
56.848USCTR1::KINGMon Jan 03 1994 16:485
    KAtz will NEVER own the Pats....  Orthwine and him really HATE each
    other with a passion....
    
    
    REK
56.849The pats are gonners, it figures, playoffs next yearMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Jan 03 1994 18:4012
    Well another note said the st louis group has 270M to spend so if the
    price tag (or offer) is 200M they have 70M to use towards paying
    damages to K-Corp.  I dont get it, why dont they just buy the Rams
    for 175-200M and save the 70M and go nuts in FA, etc....
    
    Why take the pats (other then orthwein pushing this group the pats).
    
    Orthwein is a swindler, I just hope Ban Bud takes off and Bud/Bush lose
    billions in sales due to this buisness venture...(anyone know where I
    can get a ban-bud t-shirt)...
    
    							mab
56.850MKFSA::LONGI know a survivor!Mon Jan 03 1994 18:5214
>>    Orthwein is a swindler, I just hope Ban Bud takes off and Bud/Bush lose
>>    billions in sales due to this buisness venture...(anyone know where I
>>    can get a ban-bud t-shirt)...
    
	I don't care for Orthwein either, but I would be very careful where
	I wear that t-shirt.  I would be especially careful not to wear it 
	anywhere near Merrimack, NH, where the Anheiser Busch Brewery is one
	of the biggest, if not the biggest, employers in the area.

	Folks 'round here don't take to kindly to people trying to put them
	out of a job, especially over some danged football team.


	billl
56.851VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNoTeam-NoBudTue Jan 04 1994 15:016
    	They're history.  The minute St. Louis didn't get a team it was a
    done deal.  But at least my last game there was a thriller.  Parcells
    will never go to St. Louis unless they renegotiate the contract and
    give him a lot more money.  Bill will be coaching Atlanta nexted year.
    
    				/Don
56.852not so fast.......CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jan 04 1994 15:1624
    
    
    	Yabbut I don't share your opion(tm) slasher.  The way I see it,
    Orthwine is the only one who might make out when he sells the team. 
    The other NFL owners, who probably get zilch from the sale, are open 
    to bigtime lawsuits and huge financial losses (potential is there).
    Consider the fact that Kiam only got $100M when he was "forced" to sell
    the team.  If the St. Louis group pays the rumored $200 million,
    couldn't Kiam sue under the anti-trust laws and collect triple damages
    (from the NFL owners)?  Then Kraft sues the Pats, collects his $70-$80
    million, the Town of Foxboro jumps in and does their thing.
    
    I see this possibly amounting to over $500 million dollars involved and
    I don't think the money grubbing owners want to expose themselves
    (financially) to those kind of dinero's. (my hallugen effect from
    DiNz's & 'Saw's schroom factory)
    
    BTW, I thought I heard that the St. Looois Stadium isn't ready for
    occupancy and won't be until 1995.  Am I right?
    
    I remain,
    right handed but potentially incorrect!
    Kev
    
56.853Pats play in Busch, maybe?SLBLUZ::DABLERIs it 1996 yet?Tue Jan 04 1994 18:2217
RE: <<< Note 56.852 by CSTEAM::FARLEY >>>


>>    BTW, I thought I heard that the St. Looois Stadium isn't ready for
>>    occupancy and won't be until 1995.  Am I right?
    
    Kev,


You are correct, sir.  The lovely white elephant in downtown StL will not be 
available until the 1995 season.  But, if the Pats do move here, a deal will 
more than likely be worked out for them to play in Busch Stadium for 1994 (at a
cost of some large $$'s, I'm sure)

Jim()
    

56.854megaplex postponedHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropTue Jan 04 1994 18:2531
Article: 7323
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.massachusetts
Subject: Weld, leaders agree to postpone 'megaplex'
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 94 16:51:43 PST
 
	BOSTON (UPI) -- Gov. William Weld and House and Senate leaders agreed
Monday to postpone legislative action on a controversial $700 million
sports-convention complex for Boston, which is seen as vital to keeping
the New England Patriots in Massachusetts.
	Weld said the press of other legislation prevented passage of the so-
called megaplex bill before the end of the current session at midnight
Tuesday. But he said he and Senate President William Bulger and House
Speaker Charles Flaherty had agreed to take up the measure as soon as
the Legislature reconvenes for its 1994 session Jan. 10.
	The governor, who had warned just last week that the Patriots could
be moved out of the region if the megaplex bill was not OK'd soon, said
he was now confident the measure would be enacted in time to prevent any
such move.
	``I think it's increasingly unlikely that the NFL would permit a team
to move if this megaplex legislation is approved. I just don't think
it's going to happen,'' he told reporters.
	Patriots owner James Orthwein, who put the team up for sale last
fall, has promised to keep the Patriots in Massachusetts only if the
megaplex is built.
	Flaherty, who has opposed Weld's plan to pay for the complex with
revenues from a fleet of floating gambling casinos in Boston Harbor,
introduced an alternative financing measure Monday. He said the two
plans would be the ``sole matter'' before the lawmakers at the Jan. 10th
session.

56.855CSC32::GAULKETue Jan 04 1994 18:307
    
    
    Too funny.
    
    Where's the money for this megaplex coming from?
    
    
56.856CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Tue Jan 04 1994 18:394
56.857VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNoTeam-NoBudTue Jan 04 1994 18:517
56.858METSNY::francusNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Tue Jan 04 1994 18:565
/er - other way around. Kiam bought the team and then lost in the bidding
for the stadium. Interesting article in Sunday's Globe about the stadium and
things that went on there.

The Crazy Met
56.859AKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 04 1994 19:028
    So is a bankruptcy court still involved with the stadium and or
    patriots?
    
    I thought the buying of the stadium and selling of the patriots to
    Kraft and Orthwein resp. cleaned up that mess.
    
    What exactly would a bankruptcy court have to say about Patriots
    leaving?
56.860METSNY::francusNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Tue Jan 04 1994 19:033
bankruptcy court is out of it.

The Crazy Met
56.861NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 04 1994 19:058
> bankruptcy court is out of it.

    Think of bankruptcy court as the Mets/Jets of the megaplex soap-opera
    scene...
    
    glenn
    
56.862METSNY::francusNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Tue Jan 04 1994 19:135
re: .861

huh??

The Crazy Met
56.864Pats should've kept himFRETZ::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyMon Jan 10 1994 15:063
56.865MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jan 10 1994 15:157
   >> -< Pats should've kept him >-

      Because he's an ordained minister? Maybe we can get the draft rights 
      to Billy Graham instead. 

      
56.866FRETZ::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyMon Jan 10 1994 16:013
    No because he was the only deep threat they had and the only receiver
    worthy of drawing double coverage.  A receiver like that was made for a
    QB like Bledsoe.  His role as a clergyman has nothing to do with it.
56.867Who'll be laughing when Fryay retires in two yearsKALI::MORGANMon Jan 10 1994 16:185
    As has been mentioned, the Patriots didn't LET him go.  He was traded
    for a 2nd round draft pick.  Wouldn't it make sense to see who the
    draft pick is before calling it a bad move?
    
    					Steve
56.868MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jan 10 1994 16:1913
    
  >> No because he was the only deep threat they had and the only receiver
  >> worthy of drawing double coverage.  A receiver like that was made for a
  >> QB like Bledsoe.  His role as a clergyman has nothing to do with it.
    
     Then where were you a month ago when Mac and Slasher were beefing
     about the Pats letting Irving go? I don't remember you singing this
     tune back then or all season for that matter because the Problem Child
     has had a Pro Bowl year. I think if you hadn't found out that he was
     a clergyman you wouldn't be touting him now. If Irving has gotten his
     act together then good for him but from what I understand, he dropped
     a probable touchdown in Miami's crucial end of season loss to the Pats
     - typical of him. I don't want him back at all.
56.869I sure don't miss IrvingCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Mon Jan 10 1994 16:286
Yea, Billy Graham wouldda made a great linebacker in his day...

Actually, I think Fryer had three or four productive years in NE.  I think that
Vincent Brisby will be as good as Irving was during those good years.

=Bob=
56.870FRETZ::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyMon Jan 10 1994 17:297
    You can't tell me the Pats wouldn't have won some of those close games
    if they didn't have Fryar.  If draft positioning and rebuilding are a
    higher priority than winning games, and the 2nd rounder is a decent
    player, then it was a good move.
    
    A month ago I was preparing for finals and is irrelevant as him being a
    minister.
56.871MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jan 10 1994 18:1814
  >> You can't tell me the Pats wouldn't have won some of those close games
  >> if they didn't have Fryar.  If draft positioning and rebuilding are a
  >> higher priority than winning games, and the 2nd rounder is a decent
  >> player, then it was a good move.
    
     We had this discussion about a month ago. Go back about 100 replies and 
     check it out if you're interested.

  >> A month ago I was preparing for finals and is irrelevant as him being a
  >> minister.

     Mike, I don't remember you *ever* saying anything about Irving until now.
    
56.872FRETZ::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyMon Jan 10 1994 18:265
    >     Mike, I don't remember you *ever* saying anything about Irving until now.
    
    How long have you been following SPORTS?  I haven't said anything
    recently, but I know I bashed him along with others in the archives
    when he seemed to have a nose for trouble.
56.873So I exaggerate, but not much-- I did hear "playoff" talkNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 10 1994 18:4111
                                           
    You know, according to many of the experts, if the Patriots had had
    Matt Bahr and Irving Fryar all season long, they would now be holding
    homefield advantage throughout the playoffs.  Right.  It doesn't work
    that way.  It's the old "everything that went right with the overhaul 
    still would have been there but everything that went wrong would have 
    been fixed" syndrome.  These guys were 2-14 last year.  It's called a 
    rebuilding move, and a good one at that.
    
    glenn
    
56.874FRETZ::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyMon Jan 10 1994 18:433
    Well elaborate on the Matt Bahr move.  How many games did they lose by
    missing a last second field goal?  Seattle in Foxboro was one that
    comes to mind, but that may be unfair since it was a 50-yard attempt.
56.875CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Mon Jan 10 1994 19:2012
56.876you read into replies too muchFRETZ::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyMon Jan 10 1994 19:491
    Check again, Bob.  That's Suns note has been quiet since June.
56.877PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 10 1994 19:553
56.878well said! for your reading enjoymentMSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Mon Jan 10 1994 22:4016
    This is an excerpt from the article by Phil Dine of the St. Louis 
    Post-Dispatch that was written as a response to the hatchet job done by
    Dan Shaughnessy (what else is new). Keep in mind that folks from St.
    Louis have never been all that fond of New York. And now for your
    reading pleasure; especially for our esteemed MtM.
    
    "Boston, Hub of the Universe? Get real. There may be no other city with
    such an inferiority complex, such an identity crisis. Stung because
    down deep they know they're really a quaint northern suburb of New
    York, Bostonians spend many hours seeking novel ways to put down New
    York. New Yorkers, conversely, rarely think of Boston except as a way
    station to Cape Cod."
    
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.879MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 11 1994 11:3618
  >> Stung because down deep they know they're really a quaint northern 
  >> suburb of New York, 

     Yeah and MIT is just a satellite of the Bronx Television Repair School.

  >> Bostonians spend many hours seeking novel ways to put down New York. 

     And when we're not doing that we're usually making 1/32 scale models of
     the first Thanksgiving out of belly button lint.

  >> New Yorkers, conversely, rarely think of Boston except as a way station 
  >> to Cape Cod."
    
     If New Yorkers are using Boston as a way station to Cape Cod then they're
     even dumber than we usually give 'em credit for. Boston is north of Cape
     Cod and New York is south of it. You may want to write that down, TCM.
    
56.880FORTY2::FOWLERMFight the powerTue Jan 11 1994 12:017
What's the verdict on Drew Bleddsoe after his first full season? We didn't get
to see more than a couple of plays in England, because our coverage concentrates
on top clubs (no offence intended).

Cheers,

Mike
56.881MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 11 1994 12:137
  >> What's the verdict on Drew Bleddsoe after his first full season? 

     That his arm was every bit as good as advertised. He made a lot of rookie 
     mistakes which was expected but under the right coach, and Parcells *is*
     the right coach, he'll be one of the best quarterbacks in the league in 
     two or three years.
56.882No other receivers they had could've done betterSALEM::STIGTue Jan 11 1994 12:135
    Irving Fryar would have made a big difference on the pats especially
    for that deep threat they did not have. It would have opened it up a
    bit for the other receivers as well. Speed can kill a team.
    
                       stig
56.883Way to speak from a position of strength, you traitor you...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 11 1994 12:1910
       
  >  New Yorkers, conversely, rarely think of Boston except as a way
  >  station to Cape Cod.
          
    Unless you're TCM, of course, in which case it's your livelihood, your
    sustenance, and the place where your teddy bear awaits for you when you
    come home at night...
    
    glenn
    
56.884PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 12:304
56.885I still think they made the right pick with BledsoeNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 11 1994 12:4835
>    Irving Fryar would have made a big difference on the pats especially
>    for that deep threat they did not have. It would have opened it up a
>    bit for the other receivers as well. Speed can kill a team.
 
    Except Fryar isn't really that great deep threat that everyone seems 
    to think he is, especially when he's playing in the weather conditions
    that the Patriots were once again confronted with.  We saw that for
    many years.  He's a good all-around receiver, a great blocker, and an
    excellent runner *once he's got the ball*.  Fryar would have helped to
    some extent, yes, but I just don't see him as this guy who was going to 
    take all this pressure off Bledsoe by being wide open every other play.
    He's more of a possession guy across the middle, without the hands but 
    with the big-play ability once he has the ball.
    
    That last game from Bledsoe against the Dolphins was one of the best 
    performances I saw from a QB all year (granted, not that many NFL 
    games).  The ability to complete some of those passes well downfield 
    by just bulleting the ball into very small available openings was just
    spectacular.  Rick Mirer got the early jump on Bledsoe as far as public
    opinion went this year, but at the end of the year when you look at
    what each had done it was very close, accounting for the few games
    Bledsoe missed.  Their average yards per attempt was almost identical,
    and Bledsoe had the edge in producing TDs and avoiding INTs.  Mirer
    just edged Bledsoe in the bogus NFL QB ratings, but only because of the 
    formula's double-counting effect between completion percentage and
    yards/attempt (where if two QBs produce the same number of yards on the
    same number of passes in a drive, the one with the higher completion
    percentage and shorter passes misleadingly rates higher).  I was very
    happy with the way Bledsoe improved this year from beginning to end, 
    when it wasn't even certain that this 21-year-old would even play much
    this year.  I think the future is very bright for Bledsoe.
    
    glenn
        
56.886Sad to say but Orthwein is really holding the pats backMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Jan 11 1994 12:5228
    FYI, the patriots had 7 games that could have been out right won or
    tied by just hitting FG's that they missed.  3 games were lost with
    missed FG withing the 30yrd line.  You cant say what would have happend
    had bahr been there all year because bahr was under contract elsewhere
    (I believe he was starting for Philly early in the season ?).
    
    But had the Patriots got a quality Kicker from day 1 yes they could
    have easily made the playoffs in place of Pittsburg and proberbly had
    the same results, out in 1...
    
    Im not too worried about the team, the players or the coach.  Its the
    owner and there homefield that needs to be settled.  They may end up
    losing many of there Free Agents and lose out on signing a few good
    free agents if orthwein doesnt sell this team locally and soon.  They
    cant miss this oppurtunity.  Its the first year in the cap, they have
    plenty of money and there's a few key holes to bee filed and a few key
    players that need to be resigned, and this may take money that orthwein
    wont allow to be spent....
    
    Whats better for this team, if theyre allowed to go to St Louis Group
    and move they will resign the players needed and grab some free agents,
    and K-corp said they will spend the money necessary to build a winning
    team.  But if neither of these happen in time to land Free Agents and
    protect out own players this team will be in serious trouble.  They
    could go downhill next year, and if orthwein still owns the team during
    free agency and draft this team will go down hill.....
    
    								mab
56.887It's an illusion...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 11 1994 13:0726
>    FYI, the patriots had 7 games that could have been out right won or
>    tied by just hitting FG's that they missed.  3 games were lost with
>    missed FG withing the 30yrd line.  You cant say what would have happend
>    had bahr been there all year because bahr was under contract elsewhere
>    (I believe he was starting for Philly early in the season ?).
>    
>    But had the Patriots got a quality Kicker from day 1 yes they could
>    have easily made the playoffs in place of Pittsburg and proberbly had
>    the same results, out in 1...
    
    I disagree that the Patriots could have "easily made the playoffs" with
    another kicker.  This was the kind of conclusion I was talking about
    where you assume every missed kick would have been made, you just tack 
    on the missing points at the end of the game assuming that the other 
    team would have played the game the same way, tie games become wins, etc.  
    This team was 1-11 at one point (before putting together a nice run, 
    mostly against teams who were also out of it).  That it is not a
    playoff team by any stretch of the imagination and certainly not for
    the lack of a kicker.  For starters, the Patriots gave up 50 more 
    points than they scored, much more than can be accounted for by missed 
    FGs (yes, I know the Raiders made the playoffs scoring less than they
    allowed).  Don't be deceived...
    
    glenn
    
56.888Is it all part of the bluff?KALI::MORGANTue Jan 11 1994 13:115
    At this point, what difference does a Megaplex being built make to
    Orthwein?  Isn't it true that he's received the bids from all
    interested parties?
    
    					Steve
56.889MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 11 1994 13:2718
    
      What everyone seems to be forgetting about Irving Fryar is that he
     wanted out. It wasn't a matter of playing for a draft position or him
     not fitting into Parcells' style. Irving wanted out. Parcells said from
     Day 1 that he would make every effort to trade anyone who wanted to 
     be traded and Irving wanted to be traded. With all the underclassmen
     fattening up what would have otherwise been a weak draft, I'm espec-
     ially happy that Fryar is gone even if he *has* been a deep threat for
     Miami. 
    
      As for Bledsoe vs. Mirer, other than playing for Parcells, the biggest 
     thing working in his favor this year was that he played behind an excep-
     tional and young offensive line. Unlike previous Pats QBs Plunkett and 
     Grogan, who were thrown to the wolves and ended up battered and bruised, 
     Bledsoe has been well protected. I really don't know how good Seattle
     line is but from what I hear - not very. I don't think anyone in Seattle 
     rushed for a thousand yards either. I like Mirer but I can do (and quite
     nicely) with Bledsoe.
56.890NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 11 1994 13:2828
    
>    At this point, what difference does a Megaplex being built make to
>    Orthwein?  Isn't it true that he's received the bids from all
>    interested parties?
    
    He may have already received the bids but any deadlines he's imposed 
    are entirely artificial.  If this sweetheart Megaplex deal becomes
    official, it raises the local purchase price or at least cements the
    bids that were predicated on it going through.
    
    The more I read about it the more I agree with the guys who say that
    this Megaplex project with football stadium (as opposed to without) 
    looks to be the biggest taxpayer-funded gravy train in state history.  
    On one hand we have Bob Kraft claiming that he's willing to upgrade 
    Foxboro Stadium for $50M to a perfectly serviceable, revenue-generating
    facility, at worst at only partial public cost.  On the other we have 
    the $250M+ to turn the much-needed convention center into a football 
    stadium with the seating capacity needed maybe a dozen times a year (plus 
    the one-time Super Bowl event-- right), plus an additional $100M to be 
    doled out to Worcester, Springfield, etc. just to keep everyone happy,
    plus whatever neglected amounts required to pay off Bob Kraft to move
    the team there.  Is this really necessary (I'm with Slasher on this one, 
    personally it isn't even desirable, much less necessary)?  Maybe to pay 
    the blackmail to keep the team here, yes, but economically,
    culturally, intrinsically, and whatever else, I don't think so... 
    
    glenn
    
56.891METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 11 1994 14:377
I was wondering myself how he got that Boston is a waystation to Cape Cod
in there but thought it only fair to quote the paragraph in its
entirety.

Glenn, you're slipping.

The Crazy Met
56.892PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 14:546
56.893PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 14:5610
56.894At least I had a perch to slip from...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 11 1994 15:079
    
> Glenn, you're slipping.
    
    Well, TCM, it just seems to me that you continue to neglect a pretty
    fundamental problem with your arguments that New York is a superior
    place to live than Boston: you're here and it's there.
    
    glenn
    
56.895NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 11 1994 15:1011
    
>    Most of those 50 can be accounted for in the Jets blowout where NY
>    racked up 45 points.
    
    And they got most of them back from the woeful Colts.  Again, this is a 
    one-sided point of view where everything in the debit column can be
    magically erased but everything in the credit column was an automatic,
    a given...
    
    glenn
    
56.896Not exactly the response of a guy who wanted to be here...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 11 1994 15:139
>    Come to think of it, I don't remember Fryar saying he wanted out when
>    Parcells came on board.
    
    Maybe not publicly, but he sure did respond like a pig in slop when he 
    found out he was gone...
    
    glenn
    
56.897PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 15:202
    It was definately a good move for Irving.  If Marino hadn't gone down
    you might have seen him in another Super Bowl.
56.898MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 11 1994 15:2812
  >> It was definately a good move for Irving.  If Marino hadn't gone down
  >> you might have seen him in another Super Bowl.

     It really was a good move for Irving. He had a great year. He's in the 
     Pro Bowl. And like you say, the Dolphins would have gone deep into the 
     playoffs with Marino at the helm. But I do remember Irving doing a lot
     of squawking in the off-season about it being late in his career and
     wanting to play for a contender. He made that abundantly clear to
     Parcells who granted his wish and from what I've seen of Irving this
     season, he has no regrets about not playing here. It's too bad some
     Pats fans can't sever the cord as easily as Fryar did. 
56.899Please sell the team locally QUICKLY !!!MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Jan 11 1994 15:5941
    Im not saying the pats would have won all 7 of the games that FG made
    the difference or even if they had made all attempts that they would 
    have won 1/2.  But they would have won more, no doubt, and most
    importantly they finish 5-11, split with Miami and lost too pittsburg.
    With a better Kicker would Parcells have gone for the win with pitt
    or got the tie and went for the win in OT ?  So say they won 1/2 of 
    the other games that were winnable with a decent kicker, remember a
    few of these attempts came in the 4rth qtr when if were converted the
    opposing team would have had little time to stage a comeback.  So if
    there able to win 1/2, plus pittsburg that puts them at 9-7 in a 3 way
    tie with Miami and Denver (Pitt would be at 8-8 had they not got lucky
    vs pats and wouldnt have even made it into the playoffs).  So too say
    they would have been in the playoffs with a decent kicker is not a
    stretch, its the same as saying they still wouldnt have made it with a
    decent kicker, you just dont know.  But bottom line with Bahr, a decent
    kicker, as there kicker they were 4-0, Bahr was 5 for 5 on FG tries and
    I dont beleive he missed any Extra points.
    
    The Detroit game in Week 2 Sisson missed a 27 pt FG for the WIN, ended
    up going into OT and NE lost.  So no question on this one a Decent FG
    kicker nails that one and NE wins.  Detroit went for the win and didnt
    make it, so I dont see how they would have made it if NE had made the
    FG ?
    
    Week 3 Lost too seattle by 3, ok Sisson Missed a 54 Yrd, not too many
    FG kickers are a lock at 54yds...Still a loss
    
    Week 8 VS Seattle, a 1 pt loss and Sisson missed a 48, and a 41, I have
    to beleive a Decent FG Kicker makes at least one of them, result a NE
    Win...
    
    So maybe its a stretch to say they would have made the playoffs but I
    still think, no doubt a decent kicker they win at least 3 of those 7
    close games and finish at least at 8-8.
    
    I havnt seen the schedule but I still beleive, a local owner before
    free agent/draft signings and this teams in the playoffs next year.
    Orthwein or NonLocal owner this teams wins less games next year then
    this year....
    
    							mab :-(
56.900CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Tue Jan 11 1994 16:329
Parcells asked each player point blank "do you want to stay or go".  Staying
meant on his terms, which included working out all off-season in Foxboro, 
coming to camp in sahp and understanding the new systems (offense/defense), etc.

Irving obviously didn't want to do this, so he was gone.  Some guys said they
wanted to stay, but didn't play by Parcell's rules,and were gone (John Stephens),
and some guys did everything he asked and were gone (Hugh Millen).

=Bob=
56.901METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 11 1994 19:435
Glenn,

many folks do things that are not optimal.

The Crazy Met
56.902VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,D.ReevesTue Jan 11 1994 19:5211
    	Pats were not "almost" a playoff team.  They were a 5-11 team and
    last time I looked a 9-7 record was needed to qualify for the dance. 
    That puts the Pats 4 games out after finishing the season with a four
    game winning streak.  Would've, could've and should've don't mean
    squat.  Now don't get me wrong the Pats made strides, but they beat a
    hapless Colts team and a Miami team without healthy defensive backs. 
    There is still a lot of work to be done if this team wants to really
    contend next year.  And please take the my city is better than your
    city to the Junk Note where it belongs.
    
    				/Don
56.903plex on hold - what nextAKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 11 1994 20:175
    Legislature put megaplex on hold for a month while special,
    "independent" committee looks it over.
    
    I am anticipating Orthwein coming out and saying that sale is on hold
    for a year.
56.904METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 11 1994 20:213
Why would Orthwein say that?

The Crazy Met
56.905VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,D.ReevesTue Jan 11 1994 20:213
    	SissyPlex makes the team worth a lot more in a sale.
    
    				/Don
56.906METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 11 1994 20:234
only if he selss locally. and there is no guarantee that the
Megaplex will be built and if it is that it will have a stadium.

The Crazy Met
56.907politicly saying...SALEM::STIGWed Jan 12 1994 10:133
    there dancing in the house begins...
    
                      stig
56.908They be goneCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Jan 12 1994 14:204
    Anyone know the words to "Meet me in St. Louis"??
    
    MikeL
    
56.909CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Jan 12 1994 14:228
>
>    Anyone know the words to "Meet me in St. Louis"??
>    
>    MikeL
    

Not enough of them to post here....;^)

56.910METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 12 1994 14:436
A start, maybe Tommy or JaKe can finish them

Meet me in St. Louis, Louis
Meet me at the fair

The Crazy Met
56.911VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWhitewater/WhitewashWed Jan 12 1994 14:5611
    	So did Kraft really offer 160 million to Orthwein for the team?  Is
    the offer dependent on the state building a Sissyplex?  Does Orthwein's
    lawyer have a hidden agenda to move the team to St. Louis?  How come
    House Speaker Charles Flaherty is now skeptical about a bill he wrote
    only last week?  Is James Orthwein now taking new bids when he stated
    all the bids were in?  
    
    	You have to love the merging of Boston sports and Boston politics
    on this issue.  This is better than General Hospital!
    
    				/Don
56.912PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 12 1994 15:022
    I thought Kraft's offer had nothing to do with the Megaplex.  Kraft
    said he'd upgrade Foxborough.
56.913It's not like the NFL has ever left a city high and dry...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 12 1994 15:0615
    I was angered by the pols when they nearly sabotaged the New Boston
    Garden late in the game (before they correctly measured the public
    sentiment) but not this time.  On this megaplex we've got not much 
    more to go on than a bunch of vagaries about how it's going to cost 
    somewhere between $700M and $1B when all of the pork futures are 
    called in, with Gov. Weld running around with ideas of an in-house 
    megaplex casino dancing in his head.  And of course all of this has 
    to be straightened out by Saturday to JBO's personal satisfaction.
    But to brilliant minds like Will McDonough's the solution is very
    simple: just pass something now, regardless of the petty details.
    Take it on Uncle Will's word that the NFL will make things right.
    
    glenn
       
56.914USCTR1::KINGWed Jan 12 1994 15:1814
    Kraft offferd 160 mill
    St Louis offered 190 mill with 50 mill going for expected lawsuites,
    courts etc so the offer is actually 140 mil...
    
    REK
    
    PS Anybody who wants/pushing for the megaplex is a F*CKING IDIOT who
    does not have a F*CKING clue on how  this state works. People seem to
    forget the Hynes Convention center that was remodeled to the tune of 90
    million ans was going to bring in conventions etc. The hynes convention
    center has been loaded with ex-poles that have been appointed for life.
    PSS The Hynes was suppose to bring it 30-40 mil revenue for Mass. It
    loses the state 25-30 million to run each year... Yep, I want another
    place to put old pols when they leave the statehouse....
56.915VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWhitewater/WhitewashWed Jan 12 1994 15:3510
56.916CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Jan 12 1994 16:054
>will have so much money that every resident will own a Cadillac and dine 
>out every night at the Ritz!

If they put a restaurant in the 'plex you could eat there......
56.917/er, Jasper's is probably a better bet than the RitzMETSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 12 1994 16:1011
It is always amazing how screwed up things get in MA when they deal
with such issues. Few if any other states have so many people who have
fiefdoms that need to be bribed in some form or another to get anything
done. Petty issues become so important that it is astounding. A percieved
slight by anyone can kill projects.

I suppose there might be some states in the deep South (Louisiana comes to
mind) that might also work in some such fashion, but I would guess nothing
compares to the way they do things in the Commonwealth.

The Crazy Met
56.918just an observationMKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursWed Jan 12 1994 16:1812
	TCM, I know for a fact that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania works
	in exactly the same fashion and I'd be very suprized if New Yuck
	wasn't the same.  For some bizare reason it seems to depend on 
	whether the state is predominatly Democrat or Republican.

	Not that I'm trying to interject politics into the discussion
	at all, 'cause I'm not, but in the six different states I've
	lived in, only the predominatly Democrat states are run like
	the "fiefdoms" you mentioned.


	billl
56.919CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Jan 12 1994 16:2211
>	Not that I'm trying to interject politics into the discussion
>	at all, 'cause I'm not, but in the six different states I've
>	lived in, only the predominatly Democrat states are run like
>	the "fiefdoms" you mentioned.
>

It's just a fact of life.  If you look at the origins of each party, and
you look at their core philosophy of how involved government should be
involved with the people's lives, it makes sense that it is like that....

'Saw
56.920METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 12 1994 16:236
amazingly enough NY works a lot better than MA in that sense. NY has had
Republican governors - though not for a while - and one of the 2 legislative
houses has been Republican for a long time, the other Democrat for a long
time. 

The Crazy Met
56.921CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Jan 12 1994 16:251
NYC now has a 7 year old mayor... ;^)
56.922You don't have to look that far south...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 12 1994 16:337
    
    As if the Tammany Hall political machine wasn't/isn't the most corrupt 
    in the history of this country.  Massachusetts and Boston in particular 
    are bad but, please, TCM, open your eyes...
    
    glenn
    
56.923MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jan 12 1994 16:368
    
 >> amazingly enough NY works a lot better than MA in that sense. 
    
    Not to turn this into another NY vs. Mass thing BUT both of New York's
    football teams play in New Jersey and the Yankees and Mets play in 
    what are considered the two worst stadiums in baseball. So, I'm not
    sure exactly how New York does this thing better than Mass, though
    that wouldn't be any great feat.
56.924METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 12 1994 17:348
Glenn, we were talking about today, not the 1930's. Hope the history lesson
helps.

This was not a my state is better than yours debate. Billl made a resonable
statement and question; you're getting to be about as bad as Mac with the
knee jerk responses.

The Crazy Met
56.925TCP!!!!!!!!!MKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursWed Jan 12 1994 17:465
	TCM, you are going to ruin your reputation sticking up for a
	'burgh fan.

	
	billl
56.926METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 12 1994 17:554
nah, remember Glenn is also a Pitt fan :-)

The Crazy MET!

56.927Yes, I know, you were just acting as a helpful "change agent" ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 12 1994 18:108
    
    Geez, TCM, somehow I just didn't read a "reasonable" opinion of
    something like "this is a problem for many entrenched Northeastern
    cities with archaic political systems" (Billl's point, and a good 
    one) into your original statement.  How silly of me!   
    
    glenn
    
56.928METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 12 1994 18:145
> How silly of me!

about the only sensible thing you have said.

The Crazy Met
56.929PTOVAX::JACOBWed Jan 12 1994 19:0410
    
>>Meet me in St. Louis, Louis
>>Meet me at the fair
  Just don't look for me in New England
  Cause there won't be no football there.
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
56.930PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 12 1994 19:416
56.931Mac that was preciousMSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Wed Jan 12 1994 23:025
    hahaha Mac telling me I need to get around more; this from a guy who
    believes a major road trip is to NY State. heh heh.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.932PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 13 1994 14:084
    Novelist Tom Clancy is interested in buying the Patriots and moving
    them to Connecticut.  With Parcells and Clancy running the show, will
    'Saw forsake the Giants and start rooting for the hometown team and
    stop being a NY/NJ wannabe?
56.933TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Thu Jan 13 1994 14:281
Paul Newman is involved in the Clancy group as well, I hear.
56.934FRETZ::HEISERit ain't meThu Jan 13 1994 14:302
    They'll be serving Newman salads and spaghetti to those NY-wannabe
    yuppies
56.935A done deal?CAMONE::ZIOMEKPump up the TESTThu Jan 13 1994 14:504
    Local radio-rumor here in Connecticut this morning says this was a done
    deal, last night! Can anyone confirm this?
    
    John 
56.936soap opera...SALEM::STIGThu Jan 13 1994 14:555
    re-2.  Don't forget free Tom Selleck autographed  8x10 color glossies
    for the 1st 1000 people who enter Paul Newman Stadium or will it be
    mmm..Walter Payton Stadium...
    
                          stig
56.937Who's who in the Pats LotteryMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Jan 13 1994 15:074
    One of the other notes file says orthwein/Kraft have come to an
    agreement that could be finalized in 4-5 Days...
    
    								MaB
56.938CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Jan 13 1994 15:1824
>
>    They'll be serving Newman salads and spaghetti to those NY-wannabe
>    yuppies
>

Hey, I'll give Newman a ton of credit for what he does, because all that
money goes to help a lot of boys and girls and other charities....


As to being a NY/NJ wannabe, do me.  I like the Giants and the Red Sox,
never rooted for the Pats because they were old AFL and I never rooted
for any of those teams (I mean, who could take a league seriously whose
officials wore red/white stripes). 

If the Pats move to Ct, which I still say is less likely than me winning
Olympic gold in synchronized swimming, I wouldn't root for them, and
would only go to games if the Giants were in town.


I do like Tom Clancy though.  And Paul Newman was great in "Cool Hand Luke",
"The Sting", and "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid".....


'Saw
56.939Too good to be true?CSLALL::BRULEYou may be right. I may be crazy...Thu Jan 13 1994 15:5212
    I'm usually a RON in this note so don't kill me. 
    Today's Globe had an article saying that Circus Circus inc and another
    Las Vegas have both offered to build a new mega-plex for Boston 
    and a baseball stadium if they were given a license to open a casino in 
    the Boston Area. 
    I think this would be great for the area. We get 2 nice new stadiums to
    replace the dumps we have for stadiums, instead of all the Mass
    gambling money going to Conn., Vegas and Atlantic City we can keep it
    in state. The tax revenues maybe could lessen our Income taxes and
    maybe it would even help the economy.
    
    Mike 
56.940It will never happenMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Jan 13 1994 16:2417
    Some people actually think buy adding a casino it will cause people
    to gamble.  Because we all know that gambling is Illegal and nobody
    does Illegal Gambling.... YA RIGHT.  There's more gambling in this
    state then I can shake a stick at, build a casino and people will come.
    Will it make some people who dont gamble now, gamble, of course but 
    will it turn people into gamblers, no, people who gamble, gamble.
    Weather they go to Vages, Atlantic City, CN or just Las Vegas NIghts
    every fri, sat somewhere in MA, Illegal sports betting, etc and little
    card games here and there.  
    
    This would be greate, get the stadiums, keep the pats, get a casino
    and keep some MA money in MA rather then Vages, Atlantic City and CN.
    
    Your right, sounds too good and would work out too well, it will never
    happen...
    
    							mab
56.941Cynical?CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Jan 13 1994 16:436
    It'll happen as soon as our legislators figure a way to git perennial
    payola from the Vegas crowd... HAHAHA that should take all of one phone
    call.
    
    MikeL
    
56.942Clancy's "Patriot Games II"PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 17 1994 15:4630
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Jan, 13 to 16, 1994:


--------
Subject: Author Tom Clancy looking to buy Pats
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 94 8:49:39 PST
 
	FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- Best-selling author Tom Clancy is heading a
partnership seeking to buy the New England Patriots and move the club to
Hartford.
	The Connecticut Development Authority agreed to back up the Clancy
bid with state bonds. Clancy has put together a group with a number of
limited partners and would serve as general partner. Clancy has written
such best-sellers as ``Hunt for the Red October'' and ``Patriots Games,''
which were turned into movies.
	The Connecticut legislature has approved $252.1 million in bonds to
build a football stadium should the Patriots move to Hartford.
	Current Patriots owner and chairman James B. Orthwein has said he
would like to sell the team to local investors to keep the franchise in
the Boston area.
	Orthwein has received at least three bids for the franchise,
including two that have come from investors in St. Louis and Baltimore.
	Massachusetts Governor William F. Weld and state legislators recently
agreed on a bill to build the Patriots a new domed stadium to help keep
the club in the Boston area. The proposal calls for a $700 million
stadium and convention center.
	The Patriots currently play at Foxboro Stadium, about 30 miles south
of Boston.

56.943or so it is rumored by WEEIJUPITR::MIOLAPhantomFri Jan 21 1994 12:168
    
    
    Pats have been sold... News conference at 12:00
    
    
    Buyer ...... Robert Kraft
    
    Lou
56.944confired......???????maybe????????JUPITR::MIOLAPhantomFri Jan 21 1994 12:236
    
    
    Report has been confirmed by WBZ.
    
    
    	Lou
56.945Boy I hope these rumors are truePATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 21 1994 12:593
    Dan Duquette in the Red Sox front office.  The ownership of Foxborough
    Stadium and the ownership of the Patriots have been unified once more. 
    Life is good in New England!!!!
56.946MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 14:099
    I'm home today and will try to listen to the news conference.
    
    Kraft buying the Patriots really does make the most sense; I am
    assuming that unlike Kiam, et al that Kraft can actually afford the
    team. My assumption is that Kraft would refurbish Foxboro Stadium, I
    wonder what this does to the megaplex.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.947JMHOMKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursFri Jan 21 1994 14:136
>> I wonder what this does to the megaplex.

	I, for one, hope the idea of a megaplex dies a nasty death.


	billl
56.948contenders the year afterFRETZ::HEISERMatthew 5:18Fri Jan 21 1994 14:182
    Well at least Mass. may now reap the benefits of the Pats being a
    decent team next year.
56.949CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 21 1994 14:355
    WEEI has confirmed tha Pats sale to Kraft for a reported 160mill.
    Press conference at noon.
    
    MikeL
    
56.950MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 14:425
    and 160 mil is a very nice deal for Orthwien; especially since there
    will be no law suits.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.951NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 21 1994 15:097
    
    Great news.  The megaplex can still be built for what it's needed for
    (hopefully neither football or baseball), when it's needed, if it's 
    needed.
    
    glenn
    
56.952officialMSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 15:1112
    from Orthwein:
    
    1. convinced the megaplex will be built - venue will be appropriate for
    the football team.
    
    2. pats himself on the back for revamping the Patriots
    
    3. Kraft is the new owner
    
    The Crazy Met
    
    
56.953PATS SOLD TO KRAFTMKOTS3::NEWSFri Jan 21 1994 15:4512
    	Bob Kraft bought the PATS and they are staying local.
    
    	A news conference is being held right now.
    
	Kraft refused to comment on Foxboro/Megaplex et al.
    
    	Orthwien said Kraft's bid was highest from local bidders but
    	below what some out-of-state groups bid.
    
    
    	Hurray!!
    
56.954VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady,Steady,Go!Fri Jan 21 1994 15:568
56.955MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 16:0710
    ok /er how is Murray involved? I thought he was out of the picture.
    
    re: higher offers elsewhere.
    
    But those bidders would have had to make some settlement with Kraft
    over the Foxboro lease. So Orthwein may have come out with more money
    this way.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.956A rumor that I heardCSLALL::BRULECar, body and brain all frozenFri Jan 21 1994 16:225
    Craze,
    Was there any mention of a report that Kroenke offered 50 million for
    the LEASE from Kraft?
    
    Mike
56.957MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 16:508
    I didn't hear that. Kraft and Orthwein danced around how much Kraft
    paid for the team. Kraft then danced around the megaplex issue. On the
    other hand Orthwein in his opening statement mentioned that the coming
    of the megaplex was one of the reasons that he decided that New England
    was serious about keeping the Patriots.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.958First 3 early Warm Games are a must see :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Jan 21 1994 18:0729
    Even if the megaplex gets voted Yes, it wont be built for 15-20 years
    (If ever) and bye then maybe New England will have the Patriots and
    the Rams :-)
    
    It sounds/looks like if (other state) buy the pats for 200M, then they
    get sued for 60+M from K-Korp and then Kiam sues the NFL for 3 times
    the diffence between what he sold the team for and the new selling 
    price ? (that one seems high) but that could amount to 300M and each
    team puts in 10M to cover it.  So a new owner has 200M, 60M and 10M
    for a total of 270M !!!  I heard the St Louis group wanted to work it
    so Orthwein would be responsible for any lawsuits from the move ? Makes
    no sense to sell the team for 200M if you have to pay 60-70M in damages
    and only clear 130-140 when you can walk away a hero with no hassles
    and pocket 160M, he didnt do this becasue of his work, promise or
    verbal agreement, he did it because it meant the most hassle free money
    in his pocket....
    
    Whats the asking price for the Rams, maybe he'll turn around and use
    this 160M to purchase the rams (who have no lease) and move them to
    St Louis, California has what 3 other teams, SD, SF, Raiders.  So then
    everyone is pretty much happy.  NY still has 3 teams maybe someone
    should try and but the Jets and move them to baltimore/Tennesee? or 
    wherever the other expansion team was...
    
    Doesnt matter too much, thanks to a Great Legal Lease Orthewein did
    what he had to do to make the most hassle free profit and that just
    happend to = Pats Stay in Mass !!!!!!1
    
    								mab
56.959Ain't America wonderful?!?!?TNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Jan 21 1994 18:483
    Orthwein makes a tidy $60 million profit for a 19 month investment!
    
    NAZZ
56.960CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 21 1994 18:514
56.961Jimmie O's a hero, right?AKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billFri Jan 21 1994 18:5312
    Nazz etal,
    	Now that Jim has rebuilt Pat's and ensured their Boston survival
    will the bean and cod lot go out and buy Bud by the gallon to show
    their thanx (since they were supposedly ready to boycott it for the
    opposite reasons).
    
    	Is it too, too naive to expect any thanx to the guy, not to speak
    of public apologies by various and sundry media wags.
    
    	I suppose there's a line for season tickets at foxboro as we speak.
    
    b
56.962QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyFri Jan 21 1994 18:573
      Foxboro is now natural grass?
    
      Tim
56.963PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 21 1994 18:585
    Bill, New Englanders already buy Bud by the gallon.
    
    I don't think Orthwein is entitled to any special favors from New
    Englanders.  The media did just what he wanted them to do -- helped him
    drive up the price and get a quick sale.  
56.964CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 18:5911
>
>      Foxboro is now natural grass?
>    

Yes, it was changed two seasons ago in the hopes of getting picked as
a world cup site.

It's actually not a bad turf.....


'Saw
56.965PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 21 1994 19:005
56.966It must be fridayQUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyFri Jan 21 1994 19:059
      Excuse my memory problem there little Mac.  I thought it was,  but
    its not like they show any patsies games out here.  Other than the
    donks,  they show AFC teams with winning records.
    
      I would like to see the Pats get it together and bring the likes of
    muffylo and fish to the level they deserve, and with Billy boy, they
    just might within the nexted 2 years...
    
      Tim
56.967I must have baaaaad taste then ???KIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutFri Jan 21 1994 19:177
    Can an Amerikain give a Scot a true answer as to why NO-ONE likes the
    Dolphins ?? I've hardly came across a noter who likes them let alone
    support them.
    		 Wrong note, I know - nobody reads the fish. (Sniff,
    sniff).
    Davie.
    
56.968MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jan 21 1994 19:2412
    
  >> Can an Amerikain give a Scot a true answer as to why NO-ONE likes the
  >> Dolphins ?? 
    
     The guy I carpool with is a big Dolphins fan. The guy in the next
     cubicle is a 'Phins fan too. I was very consoling when the Pats beat
     them at the end of the season to put 'em out of the playoffs. There 
     are quite a few around here and we're in the heart of New England as 
     is most of this company. No real surprise that there aren't a slew of 
     Dolphins fans in here. I'm sure south Florida is a different story.
    
    
56.969QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyFri Jan 21 1994 19:319
      My wife is a Dolphin fan.  I like Marino.  I made my statement
    because they're defensive coach sucks and they're record is better than
    they are since they play in AFC east, which has 2 good teams.  Of
    course the jets have had their number for years even though the jets
    are average at best.
    
      Tim
    
      
56.970PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 21 1994 20:065
56.971CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 24 1994 11:375
The guy who sits next to me, Big John (who's been hanging out in the
softball topic recently) is a big Dolphins fan.


'Saw
56.972GWEN::ASHEThank you Dr. King.Mon Jan 24 1994 12:222
    He's a BIG fan?  I thought that guy was out of business...
    
56.973CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 24 1994 12:375
>    He's a BIG fan?  I thought that guy was out of business...
    

No, that Big Fan was a fat slob fan.  John is anything but....8^)

56.974METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Jan 24 1994 12:444
The guy ESPN is using to promote their College basketball broadcasts is 
slowly becoming just as unbearbale as the Big Fan guy on CBS.

The Crazy Met
56.975See, it's a lot bigger...GWEN::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatMon Jan 24 1994 14:042
    Chris Farley from SNL.  I like the Big Monday ads...
    
56.976GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Mon Jan 24 1994 20:276
    TC*,
    You're just mad about the way they spliced the Farlet bit into Ewing
    missing those free throws a few weeks ago.      ;*)
    
    Dennis Faust
    
56.977MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Tue Jan 25 1994 03:267
    re: .976
    
    nah, must have missed it since I don't have a clue what you are talking
    about.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.978CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jan 25 1994 12:0012
    
    
	>>   they spliced the Farley bit into Ewing
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    	Yabbut wazzis????   Da Bobbit procedure?  Phew, I'm glad Carol's
    due anyday now, I coulda missed it had I waited!
    
    I remain,
    assuming I gotta throw away my cheeze whiz now  :^(
    Kev
    
56.979Kraft wants a winner!!SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedTue Jan 25 1994 12:246
    I heard that Kraft is going to give Parcells 35mil to play with so he
    can get what he wants. The same amount of the limit for the salary cap.
    Geez..since when has a Boston-based owner done this kind of stuff. I
    like it!!!
    
                 stig
56.980Looking forward to attending a few Pats game next yearMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Jan 25 1994 12:4817
    Ive heard that they can afford to sign 4 free agents and all there
    draft picks and stay under the cap, does anybody know if that not
    including resigning there own players(Free agents) first ?
    
    What top name Offensive Linemen are available in free agency ?
    Also any good defensive backs, saftys or Linebackers ?
    I think Tim Brown would make a great addition to there current
    offensive weapons.
    
    Maybe theyll consider going to somekind of 2 TE set and take advantage
    of there 2 best WR's on the team (Cook, Coates).
    
    I think things are looking great in Pats Land, they had a better team
    then The Colts this year and the colts have to trim to make the cap,
    Id say the pats are in great shape....
    
    								mab
56.981CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Jan 25 1994 12:525
>    Id say the pats are in great shape....
    

If not they are certainly close to being so.....

56.982Al Davis says he will match any offer...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedTue Jan 25 1994 19:294
    re-2. Tim Brown is a restricted free agent which means that the Raiders
    WILL match the offer.
    
                stig
56.983Pats notes file?CADSYS::CAVESun Feb 20 1994 21:456
	Does anyone know the name of the New England Pats note.  I
didn't update the note when it changed nodes and don't remember the new
node.

Thanks, Alan
56.984MSE1::FRANCUSBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseMon Feb 21 1994 04:1329
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 4.68*                     Related Conferences                      68 of 85
38346::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll"                       21 lines  24-JAN-1994 12:13
                 -< New England Patriots Conference is Moving >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       <<< LMOADM::LP$DISK:[NOTES$LIBRARY]NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                      -< New England Patriots (volume V) >-
================================================================================
Note 129.0                  conference on the move...                 No replies
38238::MAILLET                                       12 lines  24-JAN-1994 09:19
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The LMOADM cluster (AIADM, STEPS1) will be retired during the first week of
February.

On February 1st, I will move the NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS conference to my
workstation, RMVMS.  At that time, you will have to update your notebook entry
by typing the following:

      NOTES> MODIFY ENTRY NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS/FILE=RMVMS::NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS

Please let me if you have any problems with this.

-Ron-

    
    
56.985they also will try for WR Michael Haynes/2.5mil yr.SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Mon Feb 21 1994 05:217
    The Pats signed OL Bob Kratch to a multi-year contract (I thought that
    they would be going after DL.) Also, the Pats tried to sign kicker Pete
    Stoyanovich of the Dolphins for a 5mil for 4 year deal but he decided
    to stay with the fins for 4.2mil over 4 years. I like Krafts
    aggressiveness to get the players they want...
    
                       stig
56.986DZIGN::ROBICHAUDTonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkankMon Feb 21 1994 15:036
	Glad that Stoyanovich didn't take the Pats offer because he isn't 
worth that kind of money, but it's an indication that Scisson's days are 
numbered.  Kratch is a great pickup, but they still need a real wide 
receiver and a pass rushing defensive lineman.

				/Don
56.98738346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 21 1994 15:413
    What's with this interest in Tillman?  Can he give the Pats backfield
    something they don't already have or can't draft?  Is it just Parcells
    lusting after another Giant?
56.988CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Feb 21 1994 15:5024
>    What's with this interest in Tillman?  Can he give the Pats backfield
>    something they don't already have or can't draft?  Is it just Parcells
>    lusting after another Giant?

Tillman is a pretty good weapon, whose gotten very little press in the
shadow of Rodney Hampton.  He broke all of Walter Payton's college running
records, and he did a really excellent job filling in for Hampton this
season while Hampton was out with a knee.

He and Hampton have slightly different running styles, and I'm hard pressed
to accurately describe either.  Where Hampton is a slashing type runner, 
Tillman is more North/South, but he does have a little side-step that
makes a lot of folks miss.

The advantage of getting Tillman over drafting is you have someone with
experience, who knows the system -- an unknown over a known.


Personally, I hope George Young gets off his fat ass and pays Tillman
enough to keep him in NY.....


'Saw

56.989CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Mon Feb 21 1994 16:068
>    What's with this interest in Tillman?  Can he give the Pats backfield
>    something they don't already have or can't draft?  Is it just Parcells
>    lusting after another Giant?

I haven't seen much of Tillman, but beyond Russell, the Pats don't have much.
Tillman is surely better than Kevin Turner and Sam Gash.

=Bob=
56.990Couldn't resist, I'm a cojonebusta... 8^)CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Feb 21 1994 17:4410
>>	Glad that Stoyanovich didn't take the Pats offer because he isn't 
>>worth that kind of money, but it's an indication that Scisson's days are 
>>numbered.  
    
    Great leap_a_logic there NostraDonus...Ya think mebbe that Bledsoe's
    position was threatened by dis offer to Stoyo??
    
    8^)'s
    MikeL
    
56.991DZIGN::ROBICHAUDTonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkankMon Feb 21 1994 19:106
	Hey MikeL, kickers ain't real football players, they're soccer 
wannabees who have the intestinal fortitude of one who makes a living off 
his legs (none).  So to pay such an individual a million dollars is a waste 
of salary cap money.

				/Don
56.992CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Feb 21 1994 19:506
    Agreed on spending that much money on a kicker, and it looks like
    Sisson might hafta earn his laig money on Jack'n'Jill night at
    Alex's...
    
    MikeL
    
56.993NFL approves Kraft38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 23 1994 15:2042
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Feb 20-22, 1994:


Subject: Patriots Sale Approved By NFL
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 94 17:20:30 PST
 
	ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) -- The sale of the New England Patriots to
Robert Kraft was unanimously approved on Tuesday by NFL owners,
ensuring the team a new stability and a permanent spot in New
England.
	The approval comes a month and a day after Kraft, who owns
Sullivan Stadium, purchased the team. No price was divulged, but
Jonathan Kraft, who helped negotiate the deal for his father, said
it was the highest price ever paid for an NFL franchise.
	The two new expansion teams, Charlotte and Jacksonville, will
pay $140 million each for the right to join the league.
	Kraft is the fourth owner in six years of the Patriots, who had
been struggling on the field and off until they won their final
four games last year under new coach Bill Parcells.
	Billy Sullivan, the original owner of the team, was forced to
sell for financial reasons to Victor Kiam, who purchased the team
in 1988. Kiam then sold the team in 1992 to James B. Orthwein, who
had been part of a group trying to bring a team to St. Louis.
	Orthwein then sold the team to Kraft, although he said at the
time of the sale that he could have gotten more for the team than
someone outside New England.
	The approval is one of the quickest for a change of ownership in
recent NFL history.
	``We had already done a lot of research on him,'' NFL spokesman
Joe Browne said of Kraft.
	Kraft, who grew up in Brookline, Mass., has pledged to keep the
team in the area. It will begin play at Sullivan Stadium, but it
could move in the future to a ``megaplex'' planned for downtown
Boston.
	Gov. William Weld said after the sale to Kraft that it would
take the pressure off the legislature to act quickly on the
proposed domed stadium and convention center. Until then, the state
had hoped to use it to entice the Patriots to stay in the area.
	But Weld said he hopes the center will be built, a position
endorsed by NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue.

56.994DZIGN::ROBICHAUDDieOnYourFeet&gt;LiveOnYourKneesWed Feb 23 1994 15:344
    	The Globe says a minimun $5.00 increase in season tickets! 
    8^(
    
    				/Don
56.99538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 23 1994 16:545
    What did you expect, Slasher?  Kraft just paid a bundle of money for
    the club, Parcells is busy hiring ex-Giants for big bucks, Kraft is
    promising improvements to the stadium, Kraft won't be collecting rent
    money from the Pats, and they beat Miami in the last game of the
    season.  Of course prices are going to go up.
56.996DZIGN::ROBICHAUDDieOnYourFeet&gt;LiveOnYourKneesWed Feb 23 1994 17:185
    	I was hoping for a 7%-10% increase, not 18%-20%.  Hell, Waddle
    pays $10.00 less for his tickets than I do and he's got a better
    stadium and better seats than I do (though no longer a better team).
    
    				/Don
56.99738346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 23 1994 17:205
56.998Pats raiding the Giants again?38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 24 1994 14:0336
    Rumor has it the Pats have signed another ex-Giant, a safety.  The
    Patriots are denying they've signed anyone since the Giant OL.
    
    I wonder if changing the uniforms to blue was Bill's idea.
    

    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by  Wed, 23 Feb 94:

--------
Subject: Guyton Signs With Patriots
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 94 15:10:41 PST
 
	FOXBORO, Mass. (AP) -- Strong safety Myron Guyton became the
second New York Giant to sign with his former coach, agreeing to a
contract Wednesday with Bill Parcells' New England Patriots, a
source said.
	Last week, the Patriots made their first free agent move this
winter, signing offensive lineman Bob Kratch.
	The source, who declined to be identified, said Guyton, a
five-year veteran, agreed to a three-year deal totaling $5.2
million.
	The Patriots denied the report.
	``We have not signed anyone today,'' said an official who asked
not to be identified.
	The 6-foot-1, 205-pound Guyton was drafted by the Giants out of
Eastern Kentucky in the eighth round in 1989.
	Guyton had a solid rookie season with the Giants, taking over
the team's strong safety spot in only the second game of his
career. He ended up leading the team in tackles with 89 and fumble
recoveries with three.
	In 1990, he was one of the stalwarts of a defense that carried
the Giants to their second Super Bowl victory in four seasons. He
made 76 tackles and recovered two fumbles.
	Guyton started all 16 games in 1991, but missed the first 12 the
next season with a back injury. It required surgery, and he
returned to play well in 1993.
56.999One of Parcells' personal picksCNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 24 1994 15:257
 Guyton is a personal favorite of Parcells'. He fought tooth and nail to
 draft him because George Young and crew didn't have Guyton down on their
 best available athelete board. Bill wanted him even earlier than the 8th
 round. No surprise he's going to the Patriots....

 mike 
56.1000SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesThu Feb 24 1994 15:454
	With the Pats signing an offensive lineman in Kratch, a DB in Guyton.
Plus they are talking to WR Michael Haynes. I see the Patriots draft pick
being Dan "Big Daddy" Wilkinson from Ohio St. 
56.1001DZIGN::ROBICHAUDDieOnYourFeet&gt;LiveOnYourKneesFri Feb 25 1994 17:145
    	For a 25% increase in ticket prices, I would expect the team
    to do more than pepper the roster with ex-Midgets.  I expect a playoff
    team for those prices.
    
    				/Don
56.1002DZIGN::ROBICHAUDRIP-PeaceInTheMideastTue Mar 01 1994 16:0012
	Two days after raising ticket prices we get a story in the Sunday 
Globe by Will The Shill telling us what a heroic effort Bob Kraft put forth 
in keeping the Patriots here in New England.  Will paints him as the Little 
Engine That Could overcoming all odds because he didn't want the fans of 
New England to be without a team.  Now I read where Kraft wants the state to 
foot a 60 million dollar renovation of Schaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium 
because it will be good for the state.  Almost sounds like Kraft has the 
Boston Globe in his back pocket and the taxpayers and football fans of 
Massachusetts are going to pay and pay for the privilege of having the team 
here in Massachusetts.  8^(

				/Don
56.1003PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 16:157
56.1004PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 18:182
    The price hike hasn't slowed down ticket sales.  In fact, this is the
    best year ever so far for advance sales.
56.1005He's getting what he can, apparently...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 18:3730
>    The price hike hasn't slowed down ticket sales.  In fact, this is the
>    best year ever so far for advance sales.
    
    Yep, that's just the market, and there's not much you can do about it
    if he can sell all the tickets.  Kraft's purchase of the team in itself 
    has actually increased the demand by giving customers a sense of
    security.  There has been some disingenuousness about how these
    increases have been implemented, though.  The "no increases in the last 
    five years" is indeed true, but only because in *his* first official royal
    proclamation Sir Victor Kiam also did the fans a similar "favor" by 
    increasing prices 33% as a reward for rescuing them from the Sullivans.  
    The end result is that the majority of tickets have gone from $21 to $35 
    in the last five years, with the explanation that it's due to ownership
    changes-- small consolation.  I'll probably still cravenly jump on this 
    bandwagon, but only for a couple games.
    
    Slash, that McDonough article was certainly a creampuff piece of the
    highest order (with his network job, Will is practically an employee of
    the NFL, and it continually shows).  I think that Bob Kraft is a good
    guy and I'm very pleased that he stepped up to the plate and he should
    be commended for it, but he's still a businessman first.  Some of that 
    stuff in the article just didn't fly (I was offered $75M, then $100M to 
    sell my lease, but I just couldn't, remembering what it felt like when 
    the Braves left town).  I still think he might have a real problem
    getting any money from the legislature because now that he's actually
    signed off on the team, he doesn't have much leverage...
    
    glenn
    
56.1006PTOVAX::JACOBI lift, you grab. ...Tue Mar 01 1994 18:5210
    
>>    The price hike hasn't slowed down ticket sales.  In fact, this is the
>>    best year ever so far for advance sales.
    
    What, they selling 3 a day, versus the normal 2 a week????
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
56.1007PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 19:483
    HA HA Jake.  Actually they sold over 5K in one day alone.  The previous
    record for one day's worth of sales was around 1K and occurred when
    Parcells was hired.
56.1008MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 01 1994 19:567
    
     Yup. sold 5900 tickets one day and 1200 the next. Personally,
    I don't know whether to buy season tickets or not. On the one
    hand I love going to the game what with the atmosphere and all
    but the pressure of having to because of the blackout rule will
    be pretty much gone because just about every game figures to be 
    sold out. Decisions decisions.
56.1009and of course the PRICECNTROL::CHILDSVadar, the world's greatest AthleteWed Mar 02 1994 11:4126
 here Tommy let me help you out with this decision:

  bad stuff

	1. Metal Benches
	2. $10 parking which will probably increase
	3. 40 people in a row that was meant to seat 25
	4. Drunken fans
	5. Lousy Beer
	6. December weather
	7. $4.00 for a hotdog
	8. traffic jams

  good Stuff

	1. The team
	2. the coach
	3. the cheerleaders
	4. tougher opposistion this year
        5. chance to get together with Slasher every week - (might belong
           under the BAD)

 looks to me like the bad out weights the good.......

 mike
56.1010CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsWed Mar 02 1994 11:4522
>  bad stuff
>
>	1. Metal Benches
>	2. $10 parking which will probably increase
>	3. 40 people in a row that was meant to seat 25
>	4. Drunken fans
>	5. Lousy Beer
>	6. December weather
>	7. $4.00 for a hotdog
>	8. traffic jams
>

Mike, don't forget to mention [metal benches] that the beer is expensive,
the parking is lousy [metal benches], they chase you out of the parking
lots way too soon [metal benches], and the mounted State Police are
pretty rude [metal benches].....


hth,
'Saw


56.1011DZIGN::ROBICHAUDRIP-PeaceInTheMideastWed Mar 02 1994 19:345
56.1012METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Mar 02 1994 21:175
>> UsedToOwnCelticsTickets

is the sellout string still intact??

The Crazy Met
56.1013KALVIN::MORGANThu Mar 03 1994 11:376
56.1014CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Mar 23 1994 11:5716
    
>>>>	This will probably cut down on 50+ yard field goal attempts....

	Zamboni
    
    
    		Yabbut I don't think that will help "Missin" Sisson
    either!
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    thinking nobody's gonna play for a tie anymore
    Kev
    
56.1015DZIGN::ROBICHAUDInBadHandsWithHancockWed Mar 23 1994 15:218
    	So what exactly has the "savior" Bob Kraft done lately?  Raised
    ticket prices 25%, hinted that Massachusetts taxpayers should pay
    for any Shaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium renovations, and signed
    two free agent ex-Midgets.  MeThinks some of these Johnny-Come-Lately
    season ticket buyers may be in for a big surprise when the team
    starts snapping the pigskin.
    
    				  /Don
56.1016I like the changes alotTNPUBS::ALVEYThe sky's ablaze with ladies' legsWed Mar 23 1994 17:344
Kraft has also pissed his coach off by voting for the
rules changes.  Parsells is seething...

dr.a
56.1017METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Mar 23 1994 17:5812
yeah, notice how all those coaches who keep the game plan as conservative
and as boring as they can are opposed to these changes. no real surprise.

one coach quoted on ESPN: we'll use it on rare occasions during the
game; but if it is the end of the 4th quarter we'll still kick
the extra point to tie and go into OT.

In some sense the 2 point conversion would really make coaches make a
decision if there was no OT.

The Crazy Met

56.1018if it piss Reeves off, I'm happyCNTROL::CHILDSDean's gone fishin'Wed Mar 23 1994 18:345
the 2 point conversion would make OT obselete except that almighty TV loves
those OT commercial breaks.........

mike
56.1019Go for the two? My footAKOCOA::BREENAnd thy work is crown'dWed Mar 23 1994 19:084
    Met,
    	You have it right on the nose.  My recollection is that the afl
    coaches hardly ever attempted it - in fact afl having it could have
    been a great trivia question.
56.1020METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Mar 23 1994 19:119
why would the 2 point conversion make OT obsolete??

If a team is behind by 8 they go for the 2 pointer and hope to send
the game to OT.

If a team is down by 7 they settle for the PA and go to OT.

The Crazy Met

56.1021CNTROL::CHILDSDean's gone fishin'Wed Mar 23 1994 19:415
they could get rid of the OT forcing a coach who's behind by 7 to go for
the win or the tie........

mike
56.1022METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Mar 23 1994 20:366
re: .1021

I thought I said that.

The Crazy Met

56.1023CNTROL::CHILDSDean's gone fishin'Wed Mar 23 1994 20:475
no you stated ways to get to the OT. I'm saying get rid of OT. Make the coach
decide if he wants a win or tie on his record..........

mike
56.10242 pt or 1DELNI::FORGETThu Mar 24 1994 10:179
    
    
    
    It will be interesting to see many times a team does attempt for the 
    two.  I'm sure Coach Parells would of gone for 2 instead of Sisson
    kicking.  Does anyone off hand know when regular tickets go on sale?
    I'd like to get tickets to see the Raiders.
    
    Mike
56.1025PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 29 1994 16:495
    What the heck is Parcells up to now?  Someone in the Patriots notesfile
    is saying the Pats have given offer sheets to Tillman (Giants) and
    Blair Thomas (Jets).  They've got a guy in the backfield already who is
    good for 1000 yards a year.  Why are they jerking him around?  Probably
    because he did something to tick off Bill.
56.1026CAMONE::WAYValorTue Mar 29 1994 17:0820
>    What the heck is Parcells up to now?  Someone in the Patriots notesfile
>    is saying the Pats have given offer sheets to Tillman (Giants) and
>    Blair Thomas (Jets).  They've got a guy in the backfield already who is
>    good for 1000 yards a year.  Why are they jerking him around?  Probably
>    because he did something to tick off Bill.

No.  It's not unusual for a Parcells team to be RB heavy.  When they had
Joe Morris they traded for OJ Anderson.  When they had Rodney Hampton
they drafted Tillman.

I think the reasoning is that RBs get hurt a lot, and that you want to
have another potential 1000 yd man ready to step in.

I don't know about Blair Thomas, but Tillman is good, and Tillman is used
to being a backup.   In fact, he's really good at that.....


'Saw


56.1027could be a setup in the new world of salary capsFRETZ::HEISERShoveling that sunshineTue Mar 29 1994 17:392
    or maybe he wants to limit the free money the NY teams have left and
    go after another one of their players.
56.1028If Tilmon signs, Russell is gone...SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Wed Mar 30 1994 09:396
    I don't believe that Russell will be staying if they get Tilmon. That's
    a lot of $$$ for a RB. Russell is asking for a lot of $$$ too...If just
    Blair Thomas signs (reported $550,000) and not Tilmon then you could
    keep Russell...
    
                    stig
56.1029SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Wed Mar 30 1994 09:413
    unless of course, Russell takes less $$$...
    
                stig
56.1030looking good...SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Thu Mar 31 1994 09:253
    well, the pats signed blair thomas...
    
                  stig
56.1031DZIGN::ROBICHAUDAnybody But Arkansas!Thu Mar 31 1994 16:323
    	Blair Thomas!  Gawd!  Somewhere JoJ is celebrating.  8^(
    
    				 /Don
56.1032Jets parade in SeptemberOURGNG::RIGGENHow to parlay 1K into 100K by Hillary R.Thu Mar 31 1994 16:331
Congrats from the Jets 
56.1033SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindMon Apr 04 1994 10:066
    There was a note on Russell in Sunday's Globe from an unnamed GM in the
    NFL, who supposedly said that Russell isn't a "finisher".  That he
    often doesn't finish off a play and thereby misses out on getting a bit
    more yardage each play.  Interesting, if true.
    
    Lee
56.1034KALVIN::MORGANMon Apr 04 1994 11:289
    There are rumors of possible deals being made with Cincy to grab the
    first pick in the draft.  One possibility is N.E. trading Marv Cook 
    and swapping places with the Bengals.
    
    Supposedly, Marshall Faulk had an outstanding workout for the scouts.
    Speed, speed, speed.  I would think that N.E. would take Wilkinson if
    this deal goes through.
    
    					Steve
56.1035CNTROL::CHILDSbreakin' rocks, in the hot sunMon Apr 04 1994 12:1714
the paper I read said that Cook and the 1 st pick ain't going to do it.
Bengals are happy with Magee at TE. Bengals like Faulk so would be willing
to trade with somebody if they can stay in the top 4 picks and still have
a chace at him. It was suggested by the writer that the Pats might be
willing to give up Chung and the pick. Can't remember who supposed to
challenge Chung this year, but the writer felt he had a good chance of
unseating Chung and Chung huge salary makes this a very likely occurances.

Wish he Giants would make a move for Wilkerson. Not a combine freak but
supposedly "Big Daddy" ran 4.7 40 at the combines. Alls I know is he
reminds of Reggie White and that's good enough for me........

mike
56.1036PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Apr 04 1994 12:487
    I'm surprised at those comments about Russell.  To me it looks like
    he's always dragging tacklers for the extra yard.
    
    Harlow and Coates have been signed to new contracts.  The T&G said
    Russell is a free agent.  I didn't think he was.  Maybe the Pats were
    worried about losing him to another team and thus the interest in Blair
    Thomas and that Jint RB.
56.1037SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesMon Apr 04 1994 16:0411
	I heard it was going to be Marv Cook and a draft choice to swap
picks. Also that Cincy wanted Cook because Magee can't catch half as good
as Cook, So Magee was expendable. If the Pat's move up in the draft then
they want either Wilkinson or Faulk. Marshall ran a 4.33 40, giving the
scouts a Barry Sanders type workout. So the Pats have to be careful about
other teams jumping into the 1, 2, or 3 slots to get Faulk. If the Pat's
don't move up, then they have Adams, or Langeham, or that LB from Alcorn St
in there minds the whole time.

Ron
56.1038This cinci-cook sway thing makes no sense to meAKOCOA::BREENTill Time Shall be no MoreMon Apr 04 1994 16:1314
    I haven't been able to figure this out.  Cinci seems to be saying to
    pats that they don't need Wilkinson so they'll ensure pats can draft
    him for cook (+).
    
    	But then pats can choose Faulk if they prefer.
    
    Why don't pats just take the one left over.  Both are excellent picks.
    
    Cook is throwaway for pats but should be worth something.  It sounds
    like cinci should be the ones paying pats for cook.  They're not really
    giving up anything since they have no preference between 3rd and 4th
    pick.
    
    Bill
56.1039SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesMon Apr 04 1994 18:408
	The problem is that Faulk had such an outstanding workout. That
with only Washington and Indy needing QB's. Both can make a trade to
move down and still get there QB. So the Pats have to watch out for someone
jumping into the 2/3 spot. If Cincy takes Wilkinson, someone jumps up and
grabs Faulk. The Pats don't get either one of them.

Ron
56.1040TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Mon Apr 04 1994 18:486
I don't get it - the Pats pick fourth, right?

1. Cinci - Wilkerson or Faulk
2. Washington - Schuler
3. Indy - other QB
4. Pats - Wilkerson or Faulk
56.1041MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Apr 04 1994 18:5713
    
     I think .1039 pretty much sums it up. It's almost a given that
    Washington will take Shuler and Indy will take Trent Dilford but
    Indy may not be able to pass up Marshall Faulk or they could drop
    down to 5 or 6 or even lower and still get their QB. That's what
    has to scare the Pats *IF* Faulk is their man. Personally, I still
    think Big Daddy is the pick of the draft and the man that the Pats
    really covet. Any moves that the Pats make will probably be geared
    towards landing Big Daddy. The reported trade is Cook, Chung and the
    number one for Cincy's number one. Cook has been a marked man ever
    since Parcells came aboard. Chung may have been made expendable when
    they signed Kratch and Parcells likes Todd Rucci also. The Pats could
    move up and yet give up almost nothing. 
56.1042TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Mon Apr 04 1994 19:024
Hate to see Chung go - good o-linemen are scarce.  I wouldn't call Chung good,
but I think he will be soon.

=Bob=
56.1043MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Apr 04 1994 19:3111
    
      I'd hate to see Chung go myself. The kid has improved leaps and
     bounds since he was drafted and that's due largely to the fact that
     the kid is smart. He learns quickly and he executes what he's learned.
     Unfortunately, a shot at a Wilkerson or a Faulk makes someone like
     Chung expendable. But it's still impossible to tell what Parcells
     and the rest of the Pats draft people are really planning. Chung may
     not figure in at all. Last year, there was all kinds of speculation
     about what the Pats would do and all along they wanted Bledsoe. One
     thing Parcells doesn't do is run his team through the newspapers so
     hopefully all of this idle specualtion is just that.
56.1044HANNAH::ASHEBurn the Tiger road pajamas!Tue Apr 05 1994 01:073
    Lee, we missed ya at Fenway today... see my p-name about the new
    uniforms...
    
56.1045SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindWed Apr 06 1994 11:0512
    I agree, Walt.  When I put the game on after getting home, I thought I
    was watching the Indians, or the Angels.  I don't care for the uniforms
    at all.  Of course, there aren't any uniforms in the record book for
    RBI's or ERA, so it's strictly esthetics.
    
    Tough loss for the Tigers, but I don't think it'll be the last game
    they lose when scoring 8 runs.  Unfortunately for the Sox, it may be
    one of the few they will win after giving up 8 runs.
    
    I'm sure glad baseball is back.  I love this game.
    
    Lee
56.1046DZIGN::ROBICHAUDSylvia &gt; DeanWed Apr 06 1994 11:5532
    As I said in .1031...
    
    
    From:	AXIS::US4RMC::"james_wardle@merck.com" "James Wardle"  5-APR-1994 18:26:45.26
To:	"'smtp:robichaud@axis.enet.dec.com'" <axis::robichaud>
CC:	
Subj:	Blair Thomas


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!!

I CAIN'T BELIEVE IT....THE PATS ARE PAYING HIM HOW MUCH??????? He's a big 
scorer....6 TD's in 4 years...
And he makes Freeman McNeil look like a healthy player...

Did Parcells get hit in the haid or something?

Hawwwwwwww, you can have him. Good riddance. I can't wait until he comes to 
NY to play....Lageman is gonna
bust him in half.

JoJ

% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: from inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com by us4rmc.pko.dec.com (5.65/rmc-22feb94) id AA15880; Tue, 5 Apr 94 18:32:24 -040
% Received: from igw.merck.com by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com (5.65/21Mar94) id AA11031; Tue, 5 Apr 94 15:29:11 -070
% Message-Id: <9404052229.AA11031@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com>
% Received: by igw.merck.com with rsmtp; Tue,  5 Apr 1994 18:33:05 EDT
% From: james_wardle@merck.com (James Wardle)
% To: "'smtp:robichaud@axis.enet.dec.com'" <axis::robichaud>
% Subject: Blair Thomas
% Date: Tue, 05 Apr 94 18:29:00 EDT
56.1047SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Wed Apr 06 1994 13:235
    > Lageman is gonna bust him in half???
    
    thats if he gets to him...whats NY gonna do this year???
    
    
56.1048hate to ask but....NWD002::JOLMAMACum Grano SalisMon Apr 18 1994 19:295
    Where is the baseball notes file.
    
    Been gone for a long time.
    
    Matt the Mariner
56.1049FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixMon Apr 18 1994 19:492
    Mock draft here on KGME has the Pats taking Sam Adams (DL) or Shelby Hill
    (WR).
56.1050CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Apr 19 1994 12:5114
    
    Yabbut Matt,
    
    Ordinarily, MtM would tell you to take a lookie lookie at note 4 but
    since I'm a nice guy, I'll let ya in on a secret.......
    
    I'm it's present landlord so try CSTEAM::Baseball!
    
    hth
    
    I remain,
    not getting any rent :^(
    Kev
    
56.1051good move by the PatsFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixMon Apr 25 1994 16:462
    Chargers just unloaded some salary by sending Marion Butts to the Pats
    for a 3rd and 5th round pick.
56.1052russell will probably be goneCSLALL::BRULEIT'S SPRINGTIMEMon Apr 25 1994 17:055
    Pats also received Chargers #3. What it boiled down to was the Pats
    moving down 6 positions in the third round and giving a 5th round pick
    for Butts.
    
    Mike
56.1053SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Tue Apr 26 1994 10:331
    what a steal!!! I can't wait til next year or this year...
56.1054CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Apr 26 1994 14:146
    Good move for the Pats.
    
    How does their O-line look this year?  Will Bledsoe continue to be
    Bloodsow?
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
56.1055MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Apr 26 1994 14:2510
    
  >> How does their O-line look this year?  Will Bledsoe continue to be
  >> Bloodsow?
    
     That Pats o-line was called one of the five best in the NFL last year
     and was the strongest part of the team. That was before they added Bob 
     Kratch who came over from the Giants. With Harlow and Chung having a-
     nother year under their belts, the unit will only be stronger. The main
     weaknesses were the wideouts, the total lack of a pass rush and the
     spotty place kicking.
56.1056TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue Apr 26 1994 14:548
re: o-line

It appears that Chung's position is in jepardy.  Kratch is slated to start at 
left guard, which makes Chung expendable.  Personally, I hope that they keep 
him.  He has the tools to be a good o-lineman.  He improved dramatically lasted
year, and the only thing I think he needs to work on is his toughness.

=Bob=
56.1057Offensive line is a strengthTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Tue Apr 26 1994 15:115
    But the guy who started at the other guard lasted year (Baldinger)
    got cut.  They do have 1993's #2 draft choice Todd Rucci coming back
    from injury, and he and Chung should compete for the other guard spot.
    
    NAZZ
56.1058MKFSA::LONGThat's my story and I'm stickin' to it!Tue Apr 26 1994 15:147
	re "spotty place kicking"

	Tommy, I think you're being too kind.



	billl
56.1059fillinthe blanks sh***ySALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Tue Apr 26 1994 16:353
    how bout' "shoddy" place kickin'...
    
                stig
56.1060TypoWREATH::SCOPAFri Apr 29 1994 17:534
    Change the "o" to  "i" and the "dd" to "tt" and then you'll be
    reportin' factual data.
    
    Maj
56.1061DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFri Apr 29 1994 18:094
    	Three back to back home games this year.  Going to make for
    three back to back hurting Mondays.  8^o
    
    				   /Don
56.1062PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Apr 29 1994 18:222
    Open the season at Miami and close it at Buffalo and Chicago.  I guess
    the schedulers aren't meteorologists.
56.1063MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Apr 29 1994 18:256
    
  > Open the season at Miami and close it at Buffalo and Chicago.  I guess
  > the schedulers aren't meteorologists.
    
    But why give the warm weather and domed teams the advantage of
    finishing the season at home?
56.1064wimpsFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixFri Apr 29 1994 20:063
    They never let Phoenix open at home for the first 2 weeks since we've
    had a team.  This year is the first year we have a home game in week 2
    and it's a night game on TNT.
56.1065CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Thu May 05 1994 18:324
    Iffin' anyones coming to Cincy to watch the Pats this summer, give me
    a ring.
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
56.1066DZIGN::ROBICHAUDThu May 05 1994 18:471
    	Thanks Chip, but I'll watch them here in Foxboro...
56.1067CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Thu May 05 1994 19:475
    Hey...  I awwwready got two mebbes...
    
    (And I'll cheer against the Bengals with the best offum.)
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
56.1068TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu May 05 1994 19:504
|    Hey...  I awwwready got two mebbes...
 
Unfortunately my project with GEAE will be long done by then, but maybe I can 
swing a special trip for "follow up".
56.1069MKFSA::LONGTwo score ain't so badThu May 12 1994 16:546
	Heard on the news this a.m. that Andre Tippet was having a news
	conference this afternoon.  Speculation was that he was going to 
	retire.  Any word from the 'Peoples Republic'?


	billl
56.1070MSBCS::BRYDIETCM - World's Greatest SandbaggerThu May 12 1994 17:0310
    
      There's an article in the Globe to that effect, billl. He's really
     lost a step or more and wouldn't have started last year on most teams.
     In his prime he was an exciting player in one of the best linebacker 
     cores around with Steve Nelson, Don Blackmon and Johnny Rhembert but
     he's at the end of his string much like Mecklenburg. This is another
     example of the unfairness of the cap because a guy like Tip, who has 
     spent his whole career here and been loyal and fairly active in the
     community, deserves a better sendoff than, "Sorry, we have x number of 
     dollars to spend and you ain't worth it. See ya, Oldtimer."
56.1071MKFSA::LONGTwo score ain't so badThu May 12 1994 17:0812
	I count Tippet among the most exciting linebackers I've had the
	chance to see play.  He's right up there with Lambert, Hamm and
	Singletary IMHO.

	As far as the older players moving on to make room for the younger
	ones goes, I'd much rather have it this way than to see the NFL
	adopt some bogus thing like the the DH, that MLB uses to keep 
	has-beens around an extra coulpe of years.


	
	billl
56.1072Da poop on TippettTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu May 12 1994 17:286
Tippett is retiring and moving into the Pats front office.  He will be Director
of Player Development, and apparently will focus on preparing players for life
after football.  Maybe a made-up job, but sounds like a worthwhile endevor, 
considerign the average NFL career is something like 3 years.

=Bob=
56.1073CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeThu May 12 1994 17:3611
>after football.  Maybe a made-up job, but sounds like a worthwhile endevor, 
>considerign the average NFL career is something like 3 years.

Not made up.  I know that there are portions of the Players "union" or
association or whatever their called that have lobbied heavily for these
programs or positions...

Sounds like it might be a good thing....


'Saw
56.1074MKFSA::LONGTwo score ain't so badThu May 12 1994 19:045
	Sounds like something I should check into here as a carrer change.



	billl
56.1075CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeThu May 12 1994 19:2711
>          <<< Note 56.1074 by MKFSA::LONG "Two score ain't so bad" >>>

I scored twice in one night -- got a little sore, but you're right,
it wasn't so bad....


>	Sounds like something I should check into here as a carrer change.


You could become the Curator for the Former DEC Employees Wax Museum....

56.1076PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri May 13 1994 13:213
    The Pats' last link with the Super Bowl team of 1985 is gone.  After 12
    years and 5 Pro Bowl appearances, Andre Tippett has decided to hang 'em
    up.  He has taken a front office position with the club.
56.1077Enjoy TipQUASER::JACKSONTAThe Men go Fishing!Fri May 13 1994 15:436
    re-1
    
      He waas the one Patsy that I liked to watch.  Saw him at pile hi a
    few years back,  and his style/intensity was great!
    
      Tim
56.1078CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue May 17 1994 18:143
    Marv Cook?  What's the buzz? Good signing be the Bears?
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
56.1079PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue May 17 1994 18:224
    Cook is a former Pro Bowler who didn't fit into Parcell's system.  He
    has great hands, but apparently Bill questioned his size and blocking
    ability (why, I really don't know).  IMO, a very good pickup by the
    Bears.
56.1080TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue May 17 1994 18:2612
Yea, what Mac said.  Cook put up some impressive receiving numbers for a couple
of years on dreadful teams.  He signed a big contract, which made him a burden
to carry under the salary cap.

Good hands, good speed for a TE, good long snapper on kicks, average to fair 
blocker.

Good pickup for a pass-oriented offense

=Bob=

BTW - why did da Bears cut Peter Tom Willis?
56.1081MKFSA::LONGM-O-O-N spells layoff. Laws yes!Tue May 17 1994 18:335
	With all the ex=Steelers and ex-Patriots on the Bears this year
	I could be swayed into calling them my favorite NFC team.


	billl
56.1082CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue May 17 1994 18:4317
        They cut PT Willis (as of the last BEAR REPORT) because they couldn't
    trade him and didn't think he had the makings for a pro Q.B.  In all
    honesty he didn't do much when he had the chance and he was less mobile
    than Harbough.  When they picked up Steve Walsh, they dumped P.T.

    They feel much better about Shane Matthews as a potential pro Q.B.
    because of his size.  (Well, height anyways)

    They didn't want to go into camp with four Q.B.s this year, I think it
    is a good move as it lets the guys concentrate on the season, not
    making the cut.

    The have Eric Kramer, Steve Walsh, and Shane Matthews for their Q.B.

    It looks like Eric has many decent targets this year.

    Chip_GSH_Bach
56.1083Go Blue!MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Tue May 17 1994 18:535
    Bill,
    
    Root for the Giants!  Think of them as future Patriots!
    
    Mike
56.1084PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue May 17 1994 19:063
    I forgot about the long snapper part.  Those guys are tough to find. 
    That's why Trevor Matich is still in the NFL.  I wonder who the Pats
    are going to use now that Cook is gone.
56.1085Could be wrong thoughMAYES::MAILLOUXTue May 17 1994 19:103
    
    
    	I think they picked up DeOssie for that reason!!!
56.1086Simms....AIMHI::KCUMMINGSFri Jun 17 1994 13:096
    
    
    Wonder if Parcells will bring another one of his boys to New England??
    
    I think Simms would be great for Beldsoe.  The guy could teach him a
    few things......
56.1087The PatsLEDS::AWILLIAMSMon Jun 27 1994 17:3312
    Gentlemen:
     As you are all well aware, Bill Parcells is now the head coach of the
    Patriots. I must say that after last season's 5-11 record that things
    are going in the right direction. This team could have easily gone
    11-5, due to the fact that they lost most of their games by only 3-4
    points. Watch out for the Pats this year. I really believe that they
    are going to surprise a lot of people, and in 2-3 years be in the same
    caliber of the Dallases and 49ers of the world. They had an excellent
    draft, and look real sharp. If you remember how coach Parcells took the
    Giants in '79, and made them into contenders in just 3 years. They also
    won 2 Super Bowls. So be patient, and enjoy the Patriots as they
    rebuild themselves into a powerhouse team. 
56.1088DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameMon Jun 27 1994 17:5410
    	Anything over an 8-8 or 7-9 record would be gravy.  They still
    have no quality receivers and this year they do not play a last
    place schedule.  Things are getting better but expecting 11 wins
    or more is unrealistic.  I heard that the Foxboro  lots were charging 
    $20.00 to park for the soccer games.  Could this be a preview of
    things to come?  Kraft's white knight image would get some tarnish
    if he follows up a 25% increase in ticket prices with a 100% increase
    in parking fees.
    
    				  /Don  
56.1089MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Mon Jun 27 1994 19:394
    Does Kraft own the lots?  I thought Eddie Anvilhead et al owned
    them.
    
    Mike
56.1090MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jun 27 1994 19:4811
    
      Some of the lots are owned by the Kraft, Andelman owns several
     and still others are owned by other "entrepreneurs". 
    
      If I had a guess, I'd say that they're just gouging the soccer 
     fans. Most of these folks have never been to Foxboro, don't know 
     they're getting taken and are so excited about the Cup that they 
     don't really care. When you consider the cost of a Cup ticket and
     what they're charging for merchandise/concessions, $20 to park is
     a drop in the bucket. Of course, if Pats season roll around and they
     still try and get $20, you'll see a mini-revolt.
56.1091CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsMon Jun 27 1994 19:5612
Yes, I'd bet that the prices for the World Cup are simply because of the
World Cup.

I mean, the cheap seats were going for $25, and our seats went for $45.


The seats we had last year for England-USA were not cloes to $45 if I
remember right and we were about 8 rows from the field.   We payed $10
to park last year.


I think it's just for the soccer....
56.1092Everyone's in on the gouging act for the Cup...NAC::G_WAUGAMANClemens' stats = Huge StrikezoneMon Jun 27 1994 19:599
> I mean, the cheap seats were going for $25, and our seats went for $45.
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    The Nigerian government was getting considerably more, though... ;-)
    
    
    glenn
    
56.1093CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsMon Jun 27 1994 20:116
>    
>    The Nigerian government was getting considerably more, though... ;-)
>    
    
True, but you did get to sit next to two babes......8^)    

56.1094Let's not be rude (I wasn't)NAC::G_WAUGAMANClemens' stats = Huge StrikezoneMon Jun 27 1994 20:185
    
> True, but you did get to sit next to two babes......8^)    
    
    Bebetos is the preferred term...
    
56.1095CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 28 1994 13:0910
56.1096MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jun 28 1994 13:138
    
      Please don't sully the Pats note with that corny soccer lingo.
     For folks that think that that clown who does that "Goooolll!"
     thing on Univsion is entertaining, consider that he's not act-
     ually at the game but in a studio in Miami watching the game on 
     a monitor. All of the excitement that he expresses is fake. But
     then again, given that the game is soccer any excitement would 
     *have* to be fake.
56.1097CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 28 1994 13:218
>     a monitor. All of the excitement that he expresses is fake. But
>     then again, given that the game is soccer any excitement would 
>     *have* to be fake.


But you also have to realize that the audience he's catering to gets
excited at the tiniest little thing.....

56.1098CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jun 28 1994 13:4616
    
    
    >>  "....gets excited at the tiniest little thing...."
    
    
    
    
    
    		KEEP HIM AWAY FROM ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    
    ;^)
    
    
56.1099Abbreviated in honor of MtFMSOLANA::MAY_BRone bourbon,one scotch, and one beerTue Jun 28 1994 17:495
    >>  "....gets excited at the tiniest little thing...."
    
Like a soccer players' P.A.?
    
    BOSS
56.1100;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jun 28 1994 18:122
    
    	Yabbut wahts'sa P.A.???
56.1101No if's an's or Butts!CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jul 26 1994 13:2712
    
    
    	Yabbut I heard on the radion that newly acquired Marion Butts
    has to go under the knife.  I thought that they said he tore some
    cartilege.
    
    Has a jinx started?
    
    I remain,
    wondering if they'll win 10 games thisted year?
    Kev
    
56.1102USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jul 26 1994 18:414
I like Bill Parcells for what he's achieved as a coach, and for bringing
two NFL championships to the Giants, BUTT, it would bring a smile to my
face to see his cocky/arrogant approach to Leonard Russell wiped away
if he had to meet him on level ground if Butts' injury is serious.
56.110330008::ROBICHAUDTV Nation Roolz...Thu Jul 28 1994 16:515
    	The first five home games have been sold out!  I don't think
    the Patriot's bandwagon is strong enough to hold this kind of weight.
    I wonder if concession prices will skyrocket?
    
    				  /Don
56.1104WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly CSG/AVS DTN:293-5983Fri Jul 29 1994 02:277
    
    >    I wonder if concession prices will skyrocket?
    
    Well tickets have.  Parking is rumored to go up at least 50%.  Might
    as well hike up the watered down brews too.
    
    - Sean_not_always_this_sarcastic
56.1105MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Aug 29 1994 17:0230
    
       Hopefully the loss to Green Bay will temper some of the
      Pats in the Super Bowl talk. Yes, it was nice that they
      were once 3-0 but the scores of pre-season games are all
      but meaningless. What's important is whether or not the
      team is moving forward and the Pats appear to be doing that.
      Moving forward would be to a 7-9 or 8-8 season. A 9-7 or
      10-6 would be pretty close to a miracle. After Bledsoe's
      performance against a tough Green Bay defense, "miracle"
      might not be strong enough. A few predictions for the
      season:
    
        o Pats don't make playoffs but do manage to beat Buffalo
          at least once.
    
        o Playing for Parcells gives Vincent Brown credibility and
          he gets the Pro Bowl invite that has long been overdue.
    
        o Marion Butts rushes for over 1000 yards.
    
        o Michael Timpson drops one too many passes and gets his
          walking papers.
    
        o Chris Slade gets at least 10 sacks and overshadows first
          round pick Willie McGinest. 
       
        o Ben Coates along with Bruce Armstrong, Pat Harlow and Vincent
          Brown give that Pats four Pro Bowlers.
    
        
56.110630008::ROBICHAUDFootball &gt; BaseballMon Aug 29 1994 19:206
    	Heard over the weekend that the Jests game sold out and there
    are only a little over 5,000 tickets for the last game of the season
    against the Colts.  I agree with Tommy that the Pats will win between
    7 to 9 games depending on breaks, injuries etc.  
    
    				   /Don
56.1107METSNY::francusBaseball in 94? 95? :-( Mon Aug 29 1994 19:294
9 wins could be enough for a wild-card spot.

The Crazy Met

56.1108MKFSA::LONGIt ain't over til it's over, maybeWed Aug 31 1994 14:1511
	Does anyone know for sure what station the Miami game will be
	on Sunday?  Please say it isn't FOX.

	I'm going into panicsville since THE game is also on at 4 and
	is scheduled to be carried by FOX.

	I'll be camping for the weekend, but plan on spending Sunday
	afternoon glued to a tv somewhere in the hills of Vermont.


	billl
56.1109goCOMET::MARLANDWed Aug 31 1994 14:171
    Your safe, it's on NBC.
56.1110HANNAH::ASHEIf you want to wreck my sweater...Wed Aug 31 1994 14:183
    NE-Miami... hmmm, AFC game, and FOX does NFC... I'll go out on a limb
    and guess it's on NBC, billl...
    
56.1111MKFSA::LONGIt ain't over til it's over, maybeWed Aug 31 1994 14:2410
>>    NE-Miami... hmmm, AFC game, and FOX does NFC... I'll go out on a limb
>>    and guess it's on NBC, billl...
 
	Way cool!

	Speaking of going out on a limb, Walt(e), what was the answer
	you got last Thursday?


	billl
56.1112Going solo to see the Stones...HANNAH::ASHEIf you want to wreck my sweater...Wed Aug 31 1994 14:322
    I didn't get a clear answer, but I think I hear opportunity knocking...
    A&W's is next Wednesday, right?
56.1113FRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Wed Aug 31 1994 16:243
    The Stones are playing in a Cactus League stadium 6 miles from my
    house.  I think I'll call the cops that night and have them arrested
    for disturbing the peace.
56.1114HANNAH::ASHEIf you want to wreck my sweater...Wed Aug 31 1994 16:261
    I mean, she's going solo to the Stones...
56.111530008::ROBICHAUDFootball &gt; BaseballWed Aug 31 1994 20:545
    	So has Bledsoe been released from the hospital yet?  Maybe he
    watched Friday night's game film.  That would be enough to make
    me sick to my stomach.
    
    				  /Don
56.1116MKFSA::LONGIt ain't over til it's over, maybeThu Sep 01 1994 12:478
	I heard he was released sometime yesterday.  What a baby!  If any 
	of us have a stomach ache we take some Pepto-bismal and tough it
	out.

	Then again none of us are worth a couple million bucks either.


	billl
56.111730008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Sep 06 1994 17:006
    	Hey Tommy Brydie!  Still think Irving Fryar is an overrated
    stiff?  If New England had him instead of Todd Rucci Sunday they
    would've won the game.  Hope that 5.5 million dollar secondary can
    come around by 13:00 this Sunday.
    
    				   /Don
56.1118As a freshman against Miami, could see the greatness...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Sep 06 1994 17:2711
>    Hey Tommy Brydie!  Still think Irving Fryar is an overrated
>    stiff?
    
    And how about Marshall Faulk?  If the Patriots hadn't gone and
    messed up by winning those last two meaningless games at the end of
    last year, they'd have my dream backfield of Bledsoe/Faulk, and
    wouldn't _any_ defense, as opposed to very little... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
56.1119CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 06 1994 18:5419
>    And how about Marshall Faulk?  If the Patriots hadn't gone and
>    messed up by winning those last two meaningless games at the end of
>    last year, they'd have my dream backfield of Bledsoe/Faulk, and
>    wouldn't _any_ defense, as opposed to very little... ;-)
    
They were just talking about the Fins-Pats game on WFAN.

Francesa said that Marino watches for the weak side single coverage and
every time he gets it he goes for it.  I guess that's what he did with
Friar.

However, the question that's begging to be asked is this:

	Would Fryar, playing with the Pats, be as good receiving
	from Bledsoe as he is receiving from Marino?


'Saw    

56.1120CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound-worldTue Sep 06 1994 19:535
 and the answer is yes. He'd still have stone for hands and be absolutely
 brillant one week and a stiff the next 4............

 mike
56.112130008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Sep 06 1994 20:135
    	Hey Mike, what do you know.  You predicted a Steeler victory
    over the Cowboys!  The trading of IRVING FRYAR was a HUGE Parcells
    mistake.
    
    				  /Don
56.1122Fryar's a bozoCNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound-worldWed Sep 07 1994 12:245
 yeah but my KOD has almost put me in the Pantheon of KOD's where YOU, Dinz
 and the Chief dwell........

 ;^)
56.1124HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 07 1994 13:2514
  Leaving the tarp up was no worse than the infamous snow blower incident. 

  Football is supposed to be played in all sorts of weather including mud. If
the Patriots want to be contenders they have to learn to adjust to various
weather and field conditions. 

  And while the mud may have been an excuse for no pass rush it was no excuse
for leaving Fryar open as much as they did. He ran where he wanted when he
wanted and the Pats secondary never had any idea where he was. 

  Marino is great but he's not that great, the Pats have some tuning to do on
defense. 

  George 
56.1125Parcells should stick to coaching and get some front office helpTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodWed Sep 07 1994 14:1311
    It is obvious to me that Parcells, while definitely a great coach, is
    less than spectacular as a general manager.  The Fryar trade was a
    joke.  ALl he got for him was a third round pick that he cut and a
    second round OL who wasn't even activated Sunday.
    
    Speaking of the draft, Parcell's 1994 draft might go down as the worst
    in New England history, which is really saying something.  If McGinnest
    doesn't improve, he'll have nothing to showe for the first four rounds
    of the draft.
    
     NAZZ
56.1126HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 07 1994 14:237
  Did Parcells have anything to do with building the Giant team that won the
Superbowl or did they have some other GM that built that team for him? 

  Does the new Pats owner know anything about football or is he mainly a
business man? 

  George
56.1127CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Wed Sep 07 1994 14:3814
>
>  Did Parcells have anything to do with building the Giant team that won the
>Superbowl or did they have some other GM that built that team for him? 
>

The Giants GM was/is George Young.  Supposedly they worked together, but
I'm sure there was some friction there.  

The Giants had some fine draft picks during those years, and some clunkers.
I personally don't think that Young is that great a GM.


'Saw

56.1128CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound-worldWed Sep 07 1994 14:386
 one of the reasons why Parcells left the Giants (other than a big head) is
 that he had little say in the draft. George Young and Tom Boisture handle
 the Giants draft board........


56.1129MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Sep 07 1994 14:4516
    >> Speaking of the draft, Parcell's 1994 draft might go down as the worst
    >> in New England history, which is really saying something.  If McGinnest
    >> doesn't improve, he'll have nothing to showe for the first four rounds
    >> of the draft.
    
       A bit of an overstatement given that second round pick Kevin Lee is
       out for the year with a broken jaw and the seventh round pick actually
       started Sunday. And given some of the drafts that Steinberg engineered,
       Parcells could've used a Ouija board and still not have had the "worst
       draft in Patriots history". Let's not forget that Parcells almost
       completely cleaned house when he came aboard and most of the players
       that he let go did not catch on anywhere because they flat out
       couldn't play football. At least Bill cuts 'em loose rather than
       throw good money after bad. McGinest looks raw but he certainly is more
       talented than Chris Singleton, Ray Agnew, Vagas Ferguson, Eugene 
       Chung or any of a number of Pats first rounders.
56.1130CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Wed Sep 07 1994 14:4516
> one of the reasons why Parcells left the Giants (other than a big head) is
> that he had little say in the draft. George Young and Tom Boisture handle
> the Giants draft board........


Well, he did have those heart problems too.   Is he still smoking?


At any rate, though, you're correct there Mike.  And ol' Fat George ain't
that great a GM IMHO....


'Saw



56.1131CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Wed Sep 07 1994 14:5212
I'd put forth the premise that the Parcells reign in New England is starting
out in a similar fashion to his reign in New York.

There were some seasons there where the Giants usually lost by 6 points or
less -- they were usually in games until the very end.   A couple of us
were talking Sunday about how the Pats are close to that point right now.


Anyway, they seem to be doing okay, and better than they used to be doing....


'Saw
56.1132HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 07 1994 15:2918
  The mistakes they were making were stupid mistakes which is actually a good
sign. Those types of things can be fixed. They seemed to be getting mixed up in
their coverage leaving guys wide open down field which you can't do against a
guy like Marino. 

  Also they had a couple bad calls go against them. There was one time when a
Patriot corner back hardly touched his guy but got called on a critical down for
pass interference then a few minutes later a Dalphin was all over the Patriot
receiver but it was called incidental something or other. 

  They're not a championship team yet but at least they should win some games
and create some excitement. And with a little luck the days of sleeze are
finally over. Hopefully there will be no more GM's fighting with linebackers
questionable employment practices, locker room assaults, money shifted to
rock concerts and the like. These guys actually seem interested in playing
and winning football games.

  George 
56.1133Call me paranoic...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 07 1994 15:3439
    
> McGinest looks raw but he certainly is more
> talented than Chris Singleton, Ray Agnew, Vagas Ferguson, Eugene 
> Chung or any of a number of Pats first rounders.
  
    On the other hand, he'd better be.  McGinest is a #4 pick.  I believe
    Singleton/Agnew were 8/10 (wasted picks nonetheless) and the rest of
    these guys even lower.  Some of the expectations coming out of that
    train-wreck first half to last season was that Pats would be able to
    continue the talent building process with another excellent draft
    behind 1993's.  It's too early to say that that hasn't happened, but
    lost in the recent Patriots Euphoria, I think it's also fair to say 
    that outlook isn't quite as good as when we were all pretty confident 
    that a Wilkinson/Faulk/Stokes/Wheatley was headed our way as a payback 
    for the misery of those first 11 games.  It would be just the Patriots' 
    luck, due to a number of circumstances not the least of which was the 
    decision of some of the best talent to stay in school, to see the 
    opportunity lost due to a major talent dropoff from 1-2-3 picks to 
    the number 4.
    
    As for Young/Parcells/whomever's GM work in New York, consider that
    more so than with any other multiple-Super Bowl winner in recent 
    history, those championships were made possible due to the individual
    talents of a single player: Lawrence Taylor.  Not taking anything away
    from the other players, or Parcells' coaching (which was the other
    primary ingredient), but you just didn't have the talent stockpile that
    you had on some other great teams.  Whatever Parcells' involvement,
    I agree that there was not a tremendous draft record there that Pats' 
    fans should draw too much confidence from.  Coaching is the man's
    brilliance...
    
    I've changed my mind on the Fryar thing and will admit defeat.  I don't
    really care that he's not here, but it's another thing to get beat by
    the guy for the second time now.  Just this one loss was worth the
    picks...
    
    glenn
             
                            
56.1134CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Wed Sep 07 1994 15:5540
>    history, those championships were made possible due to the individual
>    talents of a single player: Lawrence Taylor.  Not taking anything away
>    from the other players, or Parcells' coaching (which was the other
>    primary ingredient), but you just didn't have the talent stockpile that
>    you had on some other great teams.  Whatever Parcells' involvement,
>    I agree that there was not a tremendous draft record there that Pats' 
>    fans should draw too much confidence from.  Coaching is the man's
>    brilliance...
    
To a certain extent, yes.

But let's analyze it a bit more.   LT did make things happen on defense.
One of the round table guys on ESPN's Monday Night Prime said that the
only defensive player he'd ever call an impact player was LT.  No doubt.

But consider also that the Giants offensive line was one of the best around
at the time too -- and it was two different lines that won rings, for the
most part.

The running backs were solid -- not superstars (sorry Mike C, not even Joe
Morris), but solid, high quality RBs.

Despite what folks think about Phil Simms, he did the job, did it extremely
well, was a leader on and off the field, and managed to have the 3rd best
passing day ever in the SB in 1987....


There were others in the cast besides LT.   The Giants draft philosophy, which
I have ALWAYS disagreed with, was to always draft the best athlete, regardless
of position.   I think lately that has come to bite them in the ass.


Parcells best talent, I agree, is coaching -- the ability to mold solid players
into champions.  He's not flashy, he's not going to give you exciting aerial
dynamic football, but if it's a ring you want, I'm sure he can bring it to you.


'Saw
                            

56.1135Faulk looks to be the manMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Sep 07 1994 16:0215
    I have to agree that the pats winning streak to end the season did more
    harm then good.  The #4 pick couldnt have worked out any worse for the
    pats.  Not only did they not get a shot at the 2 IMPACT players in the
    draft, the picked at #4 where a QB should have went and they didnt
    need 1, couldnt trade down and still get McGinnest so the take a 8-10
    type player with a #4 pick...
    
    Faulk looked good in his first game out, but many RB's have 1-3 good 
    games and fizzle... I just wished he was in a pats uniform, patriots
    were unable to control the clock and keep marino on the bench...
    
    4td's in the air, 1 on the ground for 35 pts and still lose a close
    game...
    
    							Bummed
56.1136MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Sep 07 1994 16:3835
    
> McGinest looks raw but he certainly is more
> talented than Chris Singleton, Ray Agnew, Vagas Ferguson, Eugene 
> Chung or any of a number of Pats first rounders.
  
  >> On the other hand, he'd better be.  McGinest is a #4 pick.  I believe
  >> Singleton/Agnew were 8/10 (wasted picks nonetheless) and the rest of
  >> these guys even lower.  

      If memory serves, Singleton and Agnew were the 8 and 10 picks that
      New England acquired by trading the number three to Seattle. The
      Seahawks used that pick to take some stiff named Cortez Kennedy.
      We certainly wouldn't want to see Cortez in a Pats uniform now
      would we? Then there are the two number one overalls that New England
      used to take Irving Fryar, who isn't here anymore and never lived
      up to his billing when he was, and the agile but fragile Ken Simms
      who showed flashes of brilliance between long long stays on the IR
      list.

   >> behind 1993's.  It's too early to say that that hasn't happened, but
   >> lost in the recent Patriots Euphoria, I think it's also fair to say 
   >> that outlook isn't quite as good as when we were all pretty confident 
   >> that a Wilkinson/Faulk/Stokes/Wheatley was headed our way as a payback 
   >> for the misery of those first 11 games.  

      The Pats are still two to three years away from being a serious
      contender. Wilkerson probably would have sped up the clock a 
      bit but whether Faulk or Wheatley would have (given that we now
      have Butts and Thompson) is highly debatable. I'll take the positive
      energy generated by the small win streak and this pre-season over
      the stigma of a 15 loss season and a chance to draft an effectively 
      unknown quantity.

                            
    
56.1137DOCTP::TESSIERWed Sep 07 1994 16:5714
Re. Parcells' input into the draft in New York, one of the more notable
cases where Parcells and Young disagreed was on Dave Meggett.  Parcells
wanted no part of him, insisting that they didn't need another short
guy (they already had Morris).  Young thought that Meggett could be an
impact player.  I guess we know who was right.

Re. the Giants not being a great team, it's true that LT was the catalyst,
but the '86 team was indeed a great team through and through.  I'll
match the linebacking corps of Taylor, Carson, Banks, Reasons, and
Pepper Johnson against any other.  In fact, I'll go so far as to say
that the '86 team's defense ranks alongside the '85 Bears' squad as
the most dominant of the past 15 years.

Ken 
56.1138CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound-worldWed Sep 07 1994 17:136
 but George Young did allow Parcells to draft Guyton in either the 7th or
 8th round the same year they picked Meggett. Guyton's a hard hitter with
 decent cover skills who's probably over-rated by Bill.........

 mike
56.1139Only gut response, but wasn't that thrilled with off/pre-seasonNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 07 1994 17:1648
    
  >> On the other hand, he'd better be.  McGinest is a #4 pick.  I believe
  >> Singleton/Agnew were 8/10 (wasted picks nonetheless) and the rest of
  >> these guys even lower.  
  >
  >    If memory serves, Singleton and Agnew were the 8 and 10 picks that
  >    New England acquired by trading the number three to Seattle. The
  >    Seahawks used that pick to take some stiff named Cortez Kennedy.
    
    I'm in full agreement that the standing draft record under Parcells is 
    nowhere near as bad as that which predeced him.  After all, in spite of
    much pressure and speculation that he'd go for "his type of player" 
    (defense, trade down for O-line, etc.), it wasn't till draft day 1993 
    that Parcells and mainly Parcells alone made the call at #1 that I'm 
    still convinced will do more for this franchise than any player since 
    John Hannah (and I guess we'd like to hope for even more).  It's just
    that I was hoping for more from the 1994 draft, certainly much more in
    the short term (admittedly of lesser importance than the long term).
    
>      The Pats are still two to three years away from being a serious
>      contender. Wilkerson probably would have sped up the clock a 
>      bit but whether Faulk or Wheatley would have (given that we now
>      have Butts and Thompson) is highly debatable.
    
    By the same token, Parcells brought in Butts and Thompson to win _now_,
    after a younger Leonard Russell who a year ago was supposedly more than 
    qualified for the role of a "Parcells back" was evaluated in the
    off-season in the most honest and real of terms possible.  I now
    believe that Parcells is not necessarily thinking first and foremost  
    of rebuilding, as neither player is likely to be of much use after 
    this 2-3 year timeframe (not to mention that Fryar could be serving the 
    same purpose, but which I could defend when the goal was so obviously
    to rebuild).  When an impact player is in your grasp, even if it's 
    only a "potential" impact (I can't agree with "unknown"), it's 
    disappointing not to get it.  Maybe it wasn't realistic to _expect_ 
    another Smith/Sanders/Thomas from a Faulk or Wheatley, but history shows 
    that having such a player on top of the solid overall base is the most 
    successful formula, so to that extent, yes, I am a bit disappointed
    that the Pats didn't get their shot at that player in likely their last
    opportunity for some time.  Willie McGinest?  Who knows, but the
    chances are probably an order of magnitude less that he'll be an impact
    player.  Parcells has already dismissed out of hand any talk that the 
    name should be used in the same breath as LT's, in any manner, including 
    Parcells' plans for deploying him.  "Completely different type of player" 
    was the assessment.
    
    glenn
    
56.1140Thru the years with the JestsOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Wed Sep 07 1994 17:2917
    Just using the Jests(tm) as an example-first round picks are a
    crapshoot:
    
    1993-Big win,the Jets get Johnny Johnson from Phoenix in exchange for
    NOT taking MAJOR bust Garrison Hearst. The Jets take Marvin Jones with
    their lower pick and he looks like a budding star.
    
    1990-Huge loss. With #2 pick in draft,they take Blair Thomas  over
    Cortez Kennedy,Junior Seau,Emitt Smith and Rodney Hampton(among
    others).
    
    1983- Take Ken O'Brien over Dan Marino.
    
    1980-Huge loss. Trade their two number 1's to SF so they can move up to #2 
    in draft where they take Lam Jones,while 49ers take Earl Cooper and
    Jimmy Webb-who play roles in SF's first two superbowl titles. Jones
    never amounts to anything.
56.1141MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Sep 07 1994 18:4332
  >> By the same token, Parcells brought in Butts and Thompson to win _now_,
  >> after a younger Leonard Russell who a year ago was supposedly more than 
  >> qualified for the role of a "Parcells back" was evaluated in the
  >> off-season in the most honest and real of terms possible.  I now
  >> believe that Parcells is not necessarily thinking first and foremost  
  >> of rebuilding, as neither player is likely to be of much use after 
  >> this 2-3 year timeframe 

     Butts and Thompson have been in the league three to four to five years
     apiece. The age difference between them and Russell is negligible if 
     there is any. Russell isn't gone because Parcells wants to "win now" 
     and is willing to sacrifice youth. Russell is gone because his agent 
     foolishly advised him to turn down the best offer the Pats would give. 
     Apparently, they thought they were still dealing with the 'old' Pats. 
     If Russell had accepted the offer (a very reasonable $1.4 million),
     he'd still be here.

  >> Maybe it wasn't realistic to _expect_ another Smith/Sanders/Thomas from 
  >> a Faulk or Wheatley, but history shows that having such a player on top 
  >> of the solid overall base is the most successful formula, 
  >> so to that extent, yes, I am a bit disappointed that the Pats didn't get 
  >> their shot at that player in likely their last opportunity for some time.  
  >> Willie McGinest?  

     Of Smith, Sanders and Thomas only one has any SB rings. OJ retired without
     any. Walter Payton acquired his late in his career after the Bears built
     a monster defense and offensive line. Earl Campbell never got one. And
     on and on. As for Willie McGinest, if he turns out to be just a solid
     starting outside linebacker who can effectively rush the passer, that'll
     be enough. He won't be another LT. No one will. If McGinest can play
     to AT's (Andre Tippett) level, I'll be ecstatic.
    
56.1142SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Wed Sep 07 1994 19:117
    
    	Just to clarify the "No tarp on the field during the monsoon on
    Sunday". There is an NFL rule which states the field can not be
    covered after a certain time. So the Miami grounds crew were just
    following the rule, by not putting the tarp on the field.
    
    Ron
56.1143I Heard them mention the 1.5 hr rule on the tarp..MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Sep 07 1994 19:5722
    Even Though Thomas doesnt have a SB ring he's been there 4 times (IN
    a Row), would the bills have made it there without a SuperStart RB ?
    (I Doubt it), would NYG WIthout the Power Running Game, or Dallas 
    without Emmit have won the SB (Proberbly not).
    
    They Say Defense Win Championships, we'll Id say you need the QB, a
    Running Game and a Defense :-) (OK you need it all)....
    
    Hey If Buffalo had a better kicker they would have won a SB :-)
    
    Having a Top RB give's you the ability to control the clock and keep
    the High Potent Offense's off the field.  If the patriots had a better
    Running Game Marino couldnt have thrown 5 TD's on sunday. And if Dallas
    didnt have a Running Game could they have kept SF out of the SB the 
    last 2 years...
    
    You need the Running Game, maybe not a Emmitt/Thurman/Barry type but
    you need to at least have the ability to control the clock.  A huge
    example is Houston VS Buffalo when they let Buffalo come back from a
    HUGE DEFICIT (Couldnt control the clock... No RB).
    
    								mab
56.1144CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Thu Sep 08 1994 14:0611
>    without Emmit have won the SB (Proberbly not).
                                    ^^^^^^^^^


I looked this word up in Websters and it wasn't there.  Then it dawned on
me.

It's referring to the Biblical Book of Proberbs, which deals with things
like what you need to win the SB and things like that.

Suddenly, it all made sense.......
56.1145HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Sep 12 1994 03:587
  More problems for the secondary but at least the running game showed signs of
life. 

  Am I the only one who felt that Bledsoe had started throwing and that should
have been an incomplete forward pass instead of a fumble and touchdown? 

  George
56.1146We wuz robbedAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneMon Sep 12 1994 11:247
    
    
    re -.1
    
    No
    
    j/
56.1147At least your team didn't lose 38-9WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Mon Sep 12 1994 12:063
    
    
        His arm was going back not forward. = FUMBLE
56.1148Bledsoe's the man. Guyton hasn't done squat!56826::MORGANMon Sep 12 1994 12:237
    Bledsoe's release is quick, but not THAT quick.  Bad call...
    
    Is it just incredibly poor pass coverage, no pass rush, or a
    combination of both with these guys?  The two safeties have been
    nowhere near the ball on these deep passes down the middle.
    
    					Steve
56.1149Cincinnati is a must win nexted weekTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodMon Sep 12 1994 13:1011
    The best performance by a defensive back in Foxboro yesterday was by
    Beasley Reece.  He was brutally honest in his analysis of the woeful
    shortcomings of the defensive backs, especially safety Myron Guyton.
    This ex-Giant looked simply pitiful yesterday.  Hurst I thought had a
    pretty decent day.  Reynolds was average at best, and Barnett got burnt
    big-time more than once.
    
    On the positive side, the only TD the Bills sscored in the 2nd half was
    on Bledsoe's fumble.
    
    NAZZ
56.1150WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Mon Sep 12 1994 13:149
    
    
    Hurst good day?
    
          Reed's Td was because of Hurst. Beebe was being double teamed by
    hurst and Guyton on his TD? IMO Hurst looked the worst.
    
    
    Chap
56.1151Tough to blame the cornerback when the safety gives no supportTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodMon Sep 12 1994 13:188
    Reed's TD was because of Guyton, as was Beebe's.  In both instances,
    the Pats were in a zone coverage.  On Reed's TD, Hurst released him to
    the inside, and Guyton didn't recognize the coverage until Reed was 10
    yards past him.  On Beebe's TD, Guyton was in good position but NEVER
    TURNED AROUND!!!!!  The ball zipped pasty his ear to Beebe for the
    score.
    
    NAZZ
56.1154atleast they're excitingCNTROL::CHILDSEverybody knows this is NowhereMon Sep 12 1994 13:434
 Al Groh is all the problem any one team can handle..........

 mike
56.1155HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Sep 12 1994 13:4415
  There are two factors that make me feel that the secondary will come around.
First, their problems seem to be not knowing what the other guys are doing thus
leaving gaps in the zone. That type of thing should cure itself as they get to
know each other and start anticipating what the other guy will do. 

  Second, the quarterbacks that beat them were the two best in the division and
two of the best in the A.F.C. Every time the Pats made a mistake they got
burnt. Other quarterbacks will find some of those gaps but not all of them. 

  If they can score 35 points each against Cinci and Detroit over the next
couple weeks they should be ok and by the time they see these guys again the
secondary should have gotten it's kinks worked out. 

  This is going to be an exciting season,
  George 
56.1156Poor clock management/timeout management etcMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Sep 12 1994 17:1610
    Bledsoe hit his receiver about 4yrds up, not his fault the receiver 
    should know where he has to get to, had he made one more step forward
    before breaking accross the middle its first down and they would have
    had to take that snap Bledsoe would have downed it and at least Bahr
    would have had a shot at Tying... I dont blame bledsoe for that one but
    he should have went for a 1-3 yrd on 4rth down pass to the outside...
    Even an incomplete pass would have shown more effort (Brains) then what
    he chose to do...
    
    								MaB
56.1157HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Sep 12 1994 17:429
  Bledsoe admitted he screwed that up in the post game interview and that he
should have thrown a sideline pass. Of course the Bills would have been looking
for just such a pass so it's not clear that it would have worked. 

  The two time outs they had to call early didn't help either. And of course if
the defense hadn't given up 38 points that call wouldn't have meant anything.
By rights he should have been kneeling down with a 35-14 lead at that point. 

  George
56.1158CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Mon Sep 12 1994 18:0410
>  Bledsoe admitted he screwed that up in the post game interview and that he
>should have thrown a sideline pass. Of course the Bills would have been looking
>for just such a pass so it's not clear that it would have worked. 
>
>  The two time outs they had to call early didn't help either. And of course if
>the defense hadn't given up 38 points that call wouldn't have meant anything.
>By rights he should have been kneeling down with a 35-14 lead at that point. 

If the o-line could've held off the Buffalo D on that TD Lodish got, the
Pats would've one too.....
56.1159FRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Mon Sep 12 1994 18:184
>If the o-line could've held off the Buffalo D on that TD Lodish got, the
>Pats would've one too.....
    
    one what?
56.1160CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Mon Sep 12 1994 18:2811
>    one what?

won one.


I probably should have spelled it "wone" -- a shorthand for won one.....
but I just used the one word to mean two....


hth,
'Saw
56.1161FRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Mon Sep 12 1994 18:403
    Well don't let it happen again.
    
    Mike (One/Won Police)
56.1162CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Mon Sep 12 1994 18:538
>
>    Well don't let it happen again.
>    
>    Mike (One/Won Police)


It was intentional.  I guess I'm just going to have to pay my Lobbyists
for Won/One Shorthand more money.....8^)
56.116330008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Sep 12 1994 19:176
    	The defense stinks, the parking stinks, the ArianHitlerYouth
    security guards with the Burger King headphones stink and the 
    Port-A-Toilets stink.  Meet the new Patriots, same as it ever 
    was.
    
    				  /Don
56.1164CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Mon Sep 12 1994 19:319
>    
>    				  /Don
>


Okay, but the burning, throbbing question here becomes:


	Do the Patriettes stink?
56.1165I never smelled oneFRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Mon Sep 12 1994 22:061
    
56.1166same as it ever was part IICNTROL::CHILDSEverybody knows this is NowhereTue Sep 13 1994 12:0310
 But Donnie you forgot they don't have All-World Fryar to BLAM(tm).....

 ;^)

 speakin' of AWF, what happened to him this weekend? Did he forget to
 wash Dan's jock? I mean atleast Michael's having a little hissy tissy
 fued with Boytoy Troy to explain his disappearing act.....

 mike
56.1167HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Sep 13 1994 13:384
  If Fryar had a bad game a good possibility was that Green Bay had him double
up. Lots of coaches would have done that given his big day against the Pats.

  George
56.1168He's a wasteCNTROL::CHILDSEverybody knows this is NowhereTue Sep 13 1994 14:014
 Fryar's has made a career out of bad days, with or without double teams.

 mike 
56.1169HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Sep 13 1994 14:169
  Baring a case of drops, is it really his fault if he has a good day or a bad
day? 

  Somehow it doesn't seem that being a wide receiver would lend itself to
good and bad days. If you run down 10 steps and break to the sideline you
are either open or you are not and you either catch the ball or you don't.
What else can go wrong?

  George
56.1170MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Tue Sep 13 1994 14:237
>> you either catch the ball or you don't.  What else can go wrong?

	I'd call that either a good day or a bad day.  You could also
	run the wrong route thus not being where the ball is thrown to.


	billl
56.1171HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Sep 13 1994 14:255
  Does Fryar have a problem with running the wrong route and dropping the
ball? I've heard that he is eccentric an he has a history of off field
antics but that's a complaint I've never heard.

  George
56.1172MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Tue Sep 13 1994 14:284
	I thought you asked what else could go wrong?  


	billl
56.1173they don't call him Stonehands for nothin' ask MartyCNTROL::CHILDSEverybody knows this is NowhereTue Sep 13 1994 14:444
 haven't watched Fryar too much have you George????????

 mike
56.1174CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 13 1994 14:4814
I'm far from Wide Receiver material, but I've noticed that the key thing
to being a WR has always been getting open, and then catching the ball.

Nowadays, getting open is as much a question of THINKING as it is speed
and quickness.  The WR has to have the ability to read the defense, because
a lot of offensive schemes are expecting the WR and QB to make the same
read and use the pass route based on that read.

Hands can be improved, but it helps if you're born with them.

Raw speed isn't a necessity (see Bilitnikof for example).


Just a few opinions.....
56.1175HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Sep 13 1994 15:0425
Re             <<< Note 56.1172 by MKFSA::LONG "Strive for five!" >>>

>	I thought you asked what else could go wrong?  

  You must have come in somewhere in the middle. I'll try to help you catch
up.

  This all started because someone said that Fryar had a bad day against the
Pack with the implication that it was his fault. That sounded strange to me
because it doesn't seem that being a wide receiver is prone to good days and
bad days. 

  As others have said, being a wide receiver consists of getting open and
catching the ball which doesn't seem to be a talent that would come or go like
hitting a baseball or being able to knock down pins in a bowling ally. 

  Baring injury, if Fryar or any other wide receiver seemed to be open some
days and not others then I'd suspect that it was the defense that had changed,
rather than suspecting that the receiver was having a good or bad day.

  Thus I concluded that Fryar's "Bad Day" against the Pack would most likely
be due to the Packers coaching staff seeing how he ran all over the Patriots
and making adjustments to keep the ball away from him.

  George
56.1176CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 13 1994 15:077
Speed and quickness can be "off" just like hitting a baseball. 

Hands that are soft one Sunday can be hard on another Sunday....



'Saw
56.1179CNTROL::CHILDSEverybody knows this is NowhereTue Sep 13 1994 15:245
WR's these days only need to develop a good pushoff move to go with good
hands. It's a shame what they've done to the passing rules......

mike
56.1180HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Sep 13 1994 15:3814
RE        <<< Note 56.1177 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>      Did anyone watch the game? If not then drop the continued
>     speculation about why Fryar's numbers were down for the week.

  -and-

>     It's ridiculous. Fryar's numbers were down for the week for the 
>     same reason that Andre Reed's numbers will be down next week.
>     He won't be playing against the New England Patriots secondary.

  Can we assume that you watched the game or are you breaking your own rule?

  George
56.1182CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 13 1994 15:5313
>
>    Nothing gets by you, Frank.
>

That's usually why they have me play cornerback.....


>    In Bilitnikoff's case, three gallons of stickum didn't hurt either.

But he was also quick.

    

56.1183HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Sep 13 1994 16:2612
RE        <<< Note 56.1181 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>  Sorry, George. Far be it from me to stop you from going on and
> on and on about something you know nothing about.

  So let me get this straight. You don't know any more about Fryar's game
against the Pack than I do but it's ok for you to go on and on about something
which you know nothing about.

  One set of rules for you, another for everyone else?

  George
56.1185HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Sep 13 1994 16:5014
RE        <<< Note 56.1184 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>       Use your common sense, George. He played against one of the
>      best defenses in the league Sunday or didn't you know that?
>      Comparing his numbers vs. Green Bay to his numbers vs. a team
>      that has given up ~750 passing yards in the last two weeks has
>      to seem a little ludicrous even to you.

  Well this actually fits my theory better than the one I was arguing against.
My theory was that he had a "bad day" because he was being covered better than
he was against the Pats. Someone else was arguing that he had a bad day because
he is streaky and prone to bad days on his own despite the coverage. 

  George
56.1187HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Sep 13 1994 17:2011
  I don't think anyone expected Fryar to have that kind of day. 

  At any rate, next up is Cincinnati. Both the Pats and Bangles go into the
game with 0-2 records. I feel good about this game and the following week
which I believe is in Detroit. The Pats offense is for real (ok, not 35 points
a game) but the defense will work out their problems. They should be 2-2 after
4 weeks.

  Anyone got the schedule? I haven't seen it around anywhere.

  George
56.1188MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Sep 13 1994 18:0038
    
			1994 Patriots schedule (from the Globe)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
			PRESEASON	(HOME GAMES IN CAPS)

    August 5 (Fri)	NEW ORLEANS				8:00pm
    August 13(Sat)	at LA Rams				10:00pm
    August 18(Thurs)	WASHINGTON				7:00pm
    August 26(Fri)	at Green Bay				7:00pm

			REGULAR SEASON    
    
    Sept 4 (Sun)	at Miami				4:00pm
    Sept 11(Sun)	BUFFALO					1:00pm
    Sept 18(Sun)	at Cincinnati				1:00pm
    Sept 25(Sun)	at Detroit				4:00pm

    Oct 2  (Sun)	GREEN BAY				1:00pm
    Oct 9  (Sun)	LA RAIDERS				4:00pm
    Oct 16 (Sun)	at New York Jets			1:00pm
    Oct 23 (Sun)	Open
    Oct 30 (Sun)	MIAMI					1:00pm

    Nov 6  (Sun)	at Cleveland				1:00pm
    Nov 13 (Sun)        MINNESOTA				1:00pm
    Nov 20 (Sun)	SAN DIEGO				1:00pm
    Nov 27 (Sun)	at Indianapolis				8:00pm
   
    Dec 4  (Sun)	NEW YORK JETS				1:00pm
    Dec 11 (Sun)	INDIANAPOLIS				1:00pm
    Dec 18 (Sun)	at Buffalo				1:00pm
    Dec 24 (Sat)	at Chicago				1:00pm

    



    
56.118930008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Sep 13 1994 22:064
    	One thing about the Pats games is that they are exciting.  More
    scoring than a Hugh Hefner party.  It's got to be killing Parcells.
                                                                       
    				   /Don
56.1190Pat's fans "Thanks Brett"SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Oct 03 1994 12:3310
Is there any doubt in anyone's mind that the Pats can thank 
Brett Farve for them being 3-2 thised morning?  

I always have mixed feeling s when my two favorite teams meet, but 
I had concluded long ago that the Pack is going nowhere with Farve.
His numbers were impressive, but he threw the key interception in 
the end zone in the fourth quarter, to allow the Pats to snatch 
victory from the jaws of defeat.

=Bob=
56.1191Parcells will loose that battle quickCNTROL::CHILDSShe was a TWO-BaggerMon Oct 03 1994 12:5616
 bad ass case of tunnel vision in Farve. I was there and atleast 4 Patriots
 were in ther area. After watching him yesterday, I got a feeling that
 Billy-Jo might get a chance soon...

 I found out how Parcells can loose his sainthood yesterday. Wait until
 him him and Drew have a real tissy, Bill will findout quick enough who's
 the man/boy is in this town. Most of the fans I heard yesterday felt it
 was only a matter of time before he breaks all of Marino's records. 
 Shouldn't they be hoping he breaks Montana's? He's got a great arm no
 doubt about it but decision making is still questionable as it with
 most slingers with big arms. 

 also no doubt about it the Patriots are playoff bound.......

 mike 
56.1192go buffsBSS::MARLANDMon Oct 03 1994 13:062
    Hope your Patriots kick Raider ass next week.
                                      a bronco fan
56.1193HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 03 1994 14:268
  Last I remember, the Pats and Pack were tied at 3 turnovers each. Add to
that the 2 missed fieldgoal attempts and it appeared that the Pats were
trying as hard to give the game to the Packers as their quarterback was trying
to give it back.

  Big game from Sharp, he almost won it for the Pack.

  George
56.1194Bledsoe > Favre, downstairs _and_ upstairs...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 03 1994 16:2415
                                                                   
> Shouldn't they be hoping he breaks Montana's? He's got a great arm no
> doubt about it but decision making is still questionable as it with
> most slingers with big arms. 
    
    But whose decision-making if anyone's (besides Favre's) was
    questionable yesterday?  With his called use of timeouts and his 
    decision to run that last play from scrimmage, Parcells is becoming 
    an outright riverboat gambler in his old age.  I still say that 
    Bledsoe's poise under the heat and in the clutch is just fine, and 
    downright uncanny for someone his age.  The rest is just nit-picking,
    the kind of faults you can find with any QB on any given day...
    
    glenn
    
56.1195uncanny's reaching imoCNTROL::CHILDSShe was a TWO-BaggerMon Oct 03 1994 17:0412
 well Glenn I saw him force a few balls in yesterday. He threw the first TD
 between three defenders. If he had less arm strength the ball would have been
 picked off. He also had a couple of balls tipped besides the interception.
 Like all the great arms he feels he can throw through the coverage. 

 I feel bad for Butts. The guy is probably hurting but because thet let
 Russell get away they're forcing Butts to play through the pain in order
 to cover up their plunder. One thing for sure the faithful at the game want
 to string po' po' marion up........

 mike  
56.1196MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Mon Oct 03 1994 18:065
    Watching/listening to yesterday's game I discovered there is an
    announcer worse than Theisman, Jerry "if I only had a brain" Glanville!
    
    
    billl
56.1197SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Oct 03 1994 18:249
|    Watching/listening to yesterday's game I discovered there is an
|    announcer worse than Theisman, Jerry "if I only had a brain" Glanville!
 
Glanville actually made a few good observations on the "inside game".
Unfortunately these gems were few and far between, and tempered with
a mountain of mindless blather.  Overall, I think he's worse than
Theisman, but neither is as bad a Joe Namath.

=Bob=
56.1198HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 03 1994 18:2715
  Did you notice that FOX blew the final field goal? The camera missed it and
the announcers didn't say a word until the play had been over for quite some
time. The only way I could tell it was good was when the Patriots pilled up on
Matt Barr for the celebration. 

  At this point I guess it doesn't mean anything since the Pats will be back to
NBC for the rest of the regular season. 

  Another thing that's weird is that inter-conference games seem to go to the
network who has the visiting team instead of the network that has the home
team. That seems really strange since it means that the network has to visit
stadiums in the other conference normally handled by the other network. You'd
think they would do it the other way around. 

  George 
56.1199Sorry guys, you won't convince me to be so jaded...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 03 1994 18:3023
> well Glenn I saw him force a few balls in yesterday. He threw the first TD
> between three defenders. If he had less arm strength the ball would have been
> picked off.
    
    When beautiful passes thrown right where they have to be for touchdowns 
    are included in the "errors in judgment" category, I think purism of
    football theory has truly run amock.  "If he had less arm strength..."  
    What the heck does that mean?  Knowing that you have that arm strength 
    is part of the QB's judgment, no?  Or is the logic that Bledsoe has 
    that great arm but he's not smart enough yet to know that he throws 
    harder than Jim Harbaugh so he shouldn't be making great plays like 
    that... ;-)
    
    My conclusion: results are what count.  So far, it's 1700+ yards, 11 
    TDs, 7 INTs personally; three straight wins, the last two huge ones 
    for the team.  And, I repeat, just 21 years old (I said "uncanny for 
    his age").  It's pretty remarkable, and appreciating the development 
    of impending greatness from the start, as it unfolds, is the most
    fulfilling way for the spectator...
    
    glenn
     
56.1200Give Leroy a chanceMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Oct 03 1994 18:4011
    The TD's are down becuase of RAY CRITTENDONE, is that 2 or 3 balls
    he should have had in the endzone and dropped todate this season ?
    
    My wife was watching the game with me and said the new Fox Announcers
    STINK... I had to explain that they were not the #1 Broadcast team for
    FOX.  The Pats still have many area's the can use/need improvement and
    there at 3-2 with once again 2 >6 pt loses....
    
    Bledsoe is looking GREAT, now if the Running Game could just jell...
    
    								mab
56.1201HANNAH::ASHEI feeel so good...Mon Oct 03 1994 18:408
>  Another thing that's weird is that inter-conference games seem to go to the
>network who has the visiting team instead of the network that has the home
>team. That seems really strange since it means that the network has to visit
>stadiums in the other conference normally handled by the other network. You'd
>think they would do it the other way around. 
    
    It's always been that way since I can remember...
    
56.1202MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Oct 03 1994 18:4413
  >> It's pretty remarkable, and appreciating the development of 
  >> impending greatness from the start, as it unfolds, is the most
  >> fulfilling way for the spectator...
    
     I feel a little queasy. Drew had a good day Sunday (I was there!)
     not incredible but solid. If Barh misses that field goal like he
     almost did, the offense chalks up 14 points in a losing effort.
     The INT was avoidable but those things happen when you try to force 
     the ball in there. He got away with a similar one last week that a
     Lions defender dropped. He'll learn to be more picky, I hope. I was 
     more happy with the play of Rod Smith, Chris Slade and Tim Goad. Those 
     guys and the rest of the D really carried the day.     
    
56.120324661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Oct 03 1994 19:193
    True, Tommy...Slade had a *huge* game.
    
    Mark.
56.1204There must be a reason...25022::BREENTue Oct 04 1994 17:185
    I would guess that uncertainty over what games are blacked out or not
    is the reason.  It may have to do with markets bordering the blackout
    limits.
    
    billte
56.1205CNTROL::CHILDSShe was a TWO-BaggerTue Oct 04 1994 17:246
 the reason is simple. NBC couldn't cover the top teams if they couldn't
 have rights to cover some NFC teams. That's why the deal was struck this
 way in the last TV contracts and this one just signed last year.

 mike 
56.1206METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 04 1994 17:525
been that way as far back as I remember. In the 1970's CBS would have
needed things that way to cover the top teams (Steeler,Raiders,Dolphins)

The Crazy Met

56.1207Chill out, MikeO8SIS::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindWed Oct 05 1994 10:0234
    Deja vu all over again.
    
    Over the years, Pats fans have always yakked about the "could've/
    should've" play that would have won the game.  Now, because the team
    is winning, it's the play that could have LOST the game.  Gimme a
    break!
    
    Is there some sort of disease that many of us suffer from that causes
    this reaction?  Bledsoe, for his age and experience, is the most
    exciting athlete in Boston, and certainly the very best QB the Pats
    have ever had.  Please note the reference to age and experience.
    
    Given that, why is he now being looked at thru a magnifier in the hopes
    of finding a fatal flaw?  Are fans preparing themselves for the flop?
    Do they secretly want him to fail so that the Pats can't get drubbed
    again in the SB?
    
    This syndrome applies to all the pro teams in Boston and N.E.  And, it
    really drives me crazy.  Why can't the fans around here just take what
    he does and be happy with it, while hoping that his improvement
    continues under the tutelage of Parcells?
    
    It is a team effort, but the QB is the most noticable player on the
    field.  How much of Bledsoe's improvement and performance is
    attributable to the work of the offensive line is unknown.  He isn't
    often forced to make a quick decision while under extreme pressure, so
    perhaps that is why he hasn't failed very often.  If and when that does
    happen, will it somehow deminish his overall value to the team?  I
    think not.
    
    Let's enjoy the games for what they are and appreciate a fine athlete
    while he is still able to perform.  It could end in the next game.
    
    Lee
56.1208ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 05 1994 11:0310
56.1209Steve Grogan is the all-time best!MSBCS::GALVINR.T. Galvin BXB1-2/H06 293-5664Wed Oct 05 1994 11:297
    Bledsoe may be great, but let's not log him into the Pat's all-time
    best category.  Steve Grogan has that honor.....let him enjoy it for at
    least another year.  If Bledsoe is still effective by age 25, he should
    have set all the team records.....then he will be the best.  Grogan was
    around for many years, and he is still the best in my books.
    
    RTG
56.1210METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Oct 05 1994 12:317
re: .1207

It might have something to do with many of the Pats fans also being
Red Sox fans.

The Crazy Met

56.1211HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 05 1994 12:344
  Perelli was better than Grogan.

  George
56.121224661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Oct 05 1994 13:023
    Who broke into Groaner's account?
    
    Mark.
56.1213HANNAH::ASHEI feeel so good...Wed Oct 05 1994 15:292
    Rams need a real QB...
    
56.1214Chandler outHBAHBA::HAASaustralopithecus westvirginiusWed Oct 05 1994 15:316
>    Rams need a real QB...    

They had one but he's injured. So they're back to a pretender, Chris
Miller.

TTom
56.1215HANNAH::ASHEI feeel so good...Wed Oct 05 1994 15:312
    Chandler's ok, but they need a little better one than that...
    
56.1216GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsWed Oct 05 1994 16:034
    
    	Hey now, they have Tommy Maddox.   :*)
    
    Claybone
56.1217CNTROL::CHILDSShe was a TWO-BaggerWed Oct 05 1994 16:062
 I agree Parilli was better than Grogan.........
56.1218ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 05 1994 16:065
56.1219grogan>parilli>bradshaw25022::BREENWed Oct 05 1994 17:111
    
56.1220HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 05 1994 17:167
RE                      <<< Note 56.1219 by 25022::BREEN >>>

>                          -< grogan>parilli>bradshaw >-

                              grogan<parilli<bradshaw 
     
  George
56.1221MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Wed Oct 05 1994 17:216
    >>                            grogan<parilli<bradshaw
    
    George, you beat me to it.
    
    
    billl
56.1222Over-analysis can be dangerous sometimes...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 05 1994 17:3113
    That's just about exactly the point I've been trying to make, Lee. 
    Very well said.  Yesterday I read a quote from the great Bill 
    Parcells where he said that even if Bledsoe were not to improve one 
    iota further, his progress to quality finished product is still the 
    fastest that he's ever seen.  I guess I still don't understand the
    claims of how stupid this kid's decisions can be sometimes, or how 
    he's forcing the ball too much (to the eternal discomfort of the 
    other team, no doubt).  I'm watching all the same games and I was 
    beginning to think that I was just hallucinating or something...
    
    glenn
    
56.1223MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Oct 05 1994 18:347
    
      I read that Parcells quote and I didn't get the same
     thing out of it at all. And over-analysis? I don't think 
     calling running for it on a 4th and 1 with time running
     out stupid is 'over-analyzing'? And psst...watching Houston 
     on Monday night sure put Faulk's season openeing performance
     in perspective, didn't it?
56.1225METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Oct 05 1994 18:575
Tommy, who was on the O-line for Cleveland when Brown played? Anyone post
that info?

The Crazy Met

56.1226HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 05 1994 18:576
RE        <<< Note 56.1224 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

  Just think, if you were the last guy on earth, there'd be no one left 
for you to hate.

  George
56.1227more psychobabble - Parcells would approve :-)METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Oct 05 1994 19:046
re: .1226

and why is that? people can and do hate themselves.

The Crazy Met

56.122824661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Oct 05 1994 19:063
    George, please try to keep up.
    
    Mark.
56.1229HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 05 1994 19:157
RE      <<< Note 56.1227 by METSNY::francus "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>

>and why is that? people can and do hate themselves.

  Oh yeh, good point.

  George
56.1230SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Oct 05 1994 19:165
re: Browns O-line

I've posted before that I remember Gene Hickerson was an 
all-pro guard, and there was one other lineman of note. 
His name escapes me right now.
56.1231ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 05 1994 19:207
56.1232Lou the Toe25022::BREENWed Oct 05 1994 19:222
    Lou Groza the legendary place kicker also played on the line.  I'm
    nearly sure it was offensive tackle.
56.1233Forest for the trees...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 05 1994 19:3941
    
>     I read that Parcells quote and I didn't get the same
>     thing out of it at all.
    
    I guess the fact that it came at the end of a Bob-Ryan-gushes-over
    latest-Boston-hero column as a kicker of "and if you don't believe  
    me, this quote from the Big Tuna himself pretty much says it all" 
    didn't tip you off.  Exactly what did you make of it?  I think 
    it's pretty evident that Parcells is *more* than happy with Bledsoe 
    right now (which is not to say that he's not going to hit some rocky
    spots along the way; he certainly will, and Parcells will let him know
    about it).

> And over-analysis? I don't think 
> calling running for it on a 4th and 1 with time running
> out stupid is 'over-analyzing'? 
    
    It is when a couple such examples lead to conclusions like "if Drew
    doesn't smarten up he [won't be winning any championships]" and 
    "sometimes he really makes you wonder if he's not a case of a 
    million-dollar arm and a ten-cent head".  You've outright come out and
    said on several occasions that Bledsoe is lacking something upstairs. 
    Sure, I think such an extrapolation is totally, completely ridiculous,
    when what's actually been happening on the field is a kid lighting up
    the skies on a pace to break the all-time NFL passing record! (not to
    mention producing a winning  record to date)!  How else should I take
    such analysis?  
    
> And psst...watching Houston 
> on Monday night sure put Faulk's season openeing performance
> in perspective, didn't it?
  
    You're hung up on that single performance, not me.  Since then it's 
    been another 100+ yard game, the two 60-yard games, and a 90.  Faulk's
    doing just fine, and according to the comment I read in last Friday's
    paper it's coming against teams stacking the line with 8-man fronts
    because no one has any respect at all for Jim Harbaugh.  Just keep
    watching...
    
    glenn
    
56.1234CNTROL::CHILDSShe was a TWO-BaggerThu Oct 06 1994 11:466
 Personally I get the feeling that Parcells would love nothing better than
 to win a tittle without a great running game. Given his ego, I think he'd 
 love to show everyone that he can win by the ground or by the air...

 mike
56.1235Dream with me for a minuteTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Oct 06 1994 12:139
    If the Patriots had traded up to the second spot in the draft (given
    up say their VALUABLE (please not sarcasm here) 2nd and 3rd round picks
    as well as the 4th pick in the draft), then Marshall Faulk would be a
    Patriot today.
    
    When Faulk and Bledsoe in the same backfield, the Patriots could have
    been prime Super Bowl contenders well into the next decade.
    
    NAZZ
56.1236But how could they win, without Willie McGinn25022::BREENThu Oct 06 1994 12:351
    
56.1237MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Oct 06 1994 13:3749
    
  > I guess the fact that it came at the end of a Bob-Ryan-gushes-over
  > latest-Boston-hero column as a kicker of "and if you don't believe  
  > me, this quote from the Big Tuna himself pretty much says it all" 
  > didn't tip you off.  Exactly what did you make of it?  

    You either are quoting a completely different article than I 
    remembered (Tuesday October, 4th) or you're making it up as you 
    go along. Because when I fish out the Globe article that I rem-
    embered the quote reads, "I would like to think we'll see some 
    improvement," says Parcells. "But if there is no room for im-
    provement then this is the fastest acceleration to completion 
    I've ever seen." Nothing about "Big Tuna himself pretty much 
    says it all" but it does say "I would like to think we'll see
    some improvement."

 >> You've outright come out and said on several occasions that Bledsoe 
 >> is lacking something upstairs. 

    I've come right out and said he's made some stupid decisions. He's
    not god, you know.

 >> Sure, I think such an extrapolation is totally, completely ridiculous,
 >> when what's actually been happening on the field is a kid lighting up
 >> the skies on a pace to break the all-time NFL passing record! (not to
 >> mention producing a winning  record to date)!  How else should I take
 >> such analysis?  

    The stupid rules enacted to open up scoring havve the numbers up in
    just about every category. That's not to completely take away from
    Drew because he has been super bt he's not completely *there* yet.
    And that winning record is 3-2. Hardly cause for a celebration at City 
    Hall Plaza.

 >> You're hung up on that single performance, not me.  Since then it's 
 >> been another 100+ yard game, the two 60-yard games, and a 90.  Faulk's
 >> doing just fine, and according to the comment I read in last Friday's
 >> paper it's coming against teams stacking the line with 8-man fronts
 >> because no one has any respect at all for Jim Harbaugh.  Just keep
 >> watching...
   
    After Faulk's first game against Houston we saw a note posted about
    how close the Pats came to having your dream backfield. Of course, we
    now know that just about anyone is capable of running for 148 yards 
    against Houston. We also got to hear how Faulk ran for more than 4
    yards per carry against the Steelers' 'fine defense'. That 'fine
    defense' is giving up more than 4 yards per carry all season long.
    Let's just put Faulk's year in perspective - so far he's done nothing. 
    
56.1239HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 06 1994 14:3218
RE        <<< Note 56.1238 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>     It ain't about hate, George. If you can't run with the big dogs then
>     stay on the porch.

  Too bad you didn't follow your own advice on this O.J. Brown debate since
you obviously don't know what you are talking about.

  So now you have read "some sports book" where "someone" says that O.J.
couldn't run until he had a better line and that proves that your right? 

  I saw Brown play and I saw O.J. play. You read some book by someone.

  GO HOME!!! BACK ON YOUR PORCH!!!

  BAD DOG!!!

  George
56.1241SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Thu Oct 06 1994 15:4411
re: OJ

Another factor in his "emergance" after 2-3 "bust" years
was a coaching change.  I forget who came in and who left, 
(I think Lou Saban was involved), but I remember reading
an article at the time that the old coach refused to 
build his offense around one guy, while the new coach 
said his offense would feature "OJ left, OJ right, then
OJ up the middle".

=Bob=
56.1242HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 06 1994 15:5725
RE        <<< Note 56.1240 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>After OJ
>    was injured in his second season, he was considered a bust in
>    Buffalo. 

  By who? The Buffalo equivalent of Dan Shaughnesy? Are you telling me that the
people running football programs felt after 2 years that O.J. wouldn't make in
in the NFL? Or was it some dick head writer who expected miracles and after 2
years concluded that O.J. was a flash in the pan. Now there's a writer to
quote. 

>In fact,
>    it's been posted that OJ had a very good blocking back and at
>    least two all-pro linemen to run behind a few years into his 
>    career. Facts not emotion please.

  Again, what facts. "It's been posted". Yeah, more opinions, just like mine.

  I watched the game Tommy. I saw Brown play and I saw O.J. play. They were
both great athletes but Brown played on a championship team. No matter how
you twist numbers, no one will call the Bills of O.J.'s time a championship
team.

  George
56.1243I'd still love to have such "nothing" on the Pats...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 06 1994 19:0945
    
>    Because when I fish out the Globe article that I rem-
>    embered the quote reads, "I would like to think we'll see some 
>    improvement," says Parcells. "But if there is no room for im-
>    provement then this is the fastest acceleration to completion 
>    I've ever seen."
    
    Seems pretty clear to me that Parcells is quite happy with Bledsoe's 
    physical and mental capacities.  The follow-up line from Bob Ryan which 
    I alluded to was: "This, from *Bill Parcells*?  That tells you all you
    need to know about how good Drew Bledsoe really is, let alone how good
    he will become".  So decide for yourself if I'm the only one 
    supposedly taking Parcells out of context...
    
>    The stupid rules enacted to open up scoring havve the numbers up in
>    just about every category. That's not to completely take away from
>    Drew because he has been super bt he's not completely *there* yet.
    
    This statement I have no problem with, although I'd point out that even
    offensive inflation doesn't detract from the fact that Bledsoe leads
    all the NFL in passing yardage (and this isn't stats-padding; without
    a running game it has been an absolute necessity).  You seem to be 
    making some progress, though, from "ten-cent head", etc...
    
>    After Faulk's first game against Houston we saw a note posted about
>    how close the Pats came to having your dream backfield.
    
    I feel no differently now.  In fact, now that it seems that Marion
    Butts isn't even a good *shortterm* solution to the Pats' pathetic
    running game, the difference between having a player like Faulk or 
    a player like Willie McGinest is if anything greater (as Nazz also
    pointed out).  But I'm not blaming anyone for this situation; it's 
    the coach's and players' duty to try and win ballgames.  All I ever 
    said was that it was somewhat disappointing to miss out on that 
    possibility.
     
>    Let's just put Faulk's year in perspective - so far he's done nothing. 
    
    Sure.  He's second in the AFC in rushing if you count his and
    Barry Foster's yardage against Houston (Faulk did better), or if 
    you don't.  I guess the final proof of Faulk's inconsequence will 
    come when he picks up the Rookie of the Year hardware...
    
    glenn
               
56.1244MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Oct 06 1994 19:2825
   >> So decide for yourself if I'm the only one supposedly taking 
   >> Parcells out of context...

      You didn't just take coach Bill out of context, you made
     up your own quote to suit your own purposes. The line that
     was supposed to be the big tipoff for dim bulbs like me, "and 
     if you don't believe me, this quote from the Big Tuna himself 
     pretty much says it all" doesn't appear anywhere in the article.
     You made that up yourself. Coach Bill said, "I'd like to think
     that there's some room for improvement." The rest of the quote
     reads to me like if this is as good as he's going to get then
     he got there awfully fast. I don't think and I don't think
     coach Bill thinks that this is as good as Bledsoe will get.
    
  >> Sure.  He's second in the AFC in rushing if you count his and
  >> Barry Foster's yardage against Houston (Faulk did better), or if 
  >> you don't.  

     Let's look down the list of great AFC running backs. There's 
     Barry Foster and then there's... Week by week Faulk's yards
     per carry average drops. 
               
   
   
    
56.1245Sheesh, at least be the slightest bit honest and objective...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 06 1994 20:0211
    
>     Let's look down the list of great AFC running backs. There's 
>     Barry Foster and then there's...

    Marion Butts, good enough for anything the Patriots might need from a
    running back over the next couple years?  Well, there you have it.  
    From Barry Foster straight to "nothing", no in between.  Hello, goodbye, 
    Thurman Thomas or anyone else...
    
    glenn
    
56.1246MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Oct 07 1994 12:1920
  >> Marion Butts, good enough for anything the Patriots might need from a
  >> running back over the next couple years?  Well, there you have it.  
  >> From Barry Foster straight to "nothing", no in between.  Hello, goodbye, 
  >> Thurman Thomas or anyone else...
    
     Marion has been a bust so far but I'm not convinced that he's fully
     recovered from his injury. At least, I hope he has a legitimate excuse.
     Thurman Thomas sat out last week with a bum knee and has been knicked 
     all season. He ceratinly hasn't really had a Thurman Thomas year so
     far. Remember after the first game of the season when he racked up
     like 4 yards rushing and everyone was wondering what was wrong with
     Thurman? Behind Foster and Faulk righ now you have Chris Warren, Johnny 
     Johnson and Natrone Means. Wheee! All decent backs but just so. Nothing
     like the cream of the crop over in the NFC with Sanders, Bettis, Emmitt,
     Ricky Watters, etc., etc., etc. At this point, Faulk ranks second over
     a fairly mediocre bunch.
     
    
    
56.1247SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Oct 07 1994 12:419
|     Marion has been a bust so far but I'm not convinced that he's fully
|     recovered from his injury. At least, I hope he has a legitimate excuse.

I'm also convinced that Butts is not 100%.  There is no
way that he could be a successful NFL back, leave alone
a star, getting to holes as slowly as he has been this 
season.

=Bob=
56.1248HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 07 1994 13:2110
  Last Sunday on Sports Spotlight they were saying that it's not Butts fault
because the offensive line is not giving him any holes to run through. They
said he is not Barry Sanders who creates his own opportunities but he might do
ok if he had a little running room. 

  The line seems to do a good job of protecting the quarterback and the runners
are not getting caught behind the line of scrimmage, but every time the reach
the line they hit a wall of people. 

  George 
56.1249HANNAH::ASHEI feeel so good...Fri Oct 07 1994 13:262
    Thomas doesn't get mentioned as a great AFC rb?
    
56.1250SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Oct 07 1994 13:4516
re: Pats o-line

I think I've said it before in here.  The Pats' blocking
scheme seems to leave some people (linebacker ususally)
on the weak side (where the back is not running) 
unblocked.  It assumes that the rb will hit the hole on
the strong side faster than the lb can persue and tackle
him.  What I've seen of Butts, he is not getting to the
hole fast enough, and the penetration is catchign up 
with him.

That's not to say that the o-line is doign well.  The 
three journeymen in the middle are giving them nothing
much of the time.

=Bob=
56.1251MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Oct 07 1994 15:129
    
      The thing that has most disappointed me abou Butts is that
     I don't think that I've seen him break two tackles all year.
     I was expecting to see him punish people like...oh, I don't
     know...JIM BROWN! but what I've seen is corner backs taking 
     him down no problem. I've seen linebackers grab him by the
     shoulder of his jersey and spin him down like a rag doll.
     The holes haven't been there very often but neither has he
     run with authority.
56.1252HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 07 1994 15:268
  The thing they were puzzling over on sports spotlight was whether the
Patriots line was any good or not. They were saying that normally if a team can
protect the quarterback then they should open some holes. And lines that can't
open holes usually get pushed around on pass protection. 

  But the Pats seem to protect the QB but can't do anything to help the run. 

  George
56.1253SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Oct 07 1994 16:1414
|  But the Pats seem to protect the QB but can't do anything to help the run. 

Pass blocking and run blocking are very different, but
they are right, in that if you can pass block, you can
ususally run block.

Pass blocking is generally a matter of picking your man,
and then going one-on-one against him.  It is simply a
matter of who is stronger and quicker.  Run blocking is
much more tecnique - a matter of getting yourself where
you need to be, and keeping the other team away from the
runner.

=Bob=
56.1254In other words, San Diego wasn't completely stupid...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Oct 07 1994 18:0719
                                                
> I'm also convinced that Butts is not 100%.  There is no
> way that he could be a successful NFL back, leave alone
> a star, getting to holes as slowly as he has been this 
> season.
    
    Unfortunately, even before Butts got hurt in the pre-season the stated
    concern about him was that after 5 full years of constant pounding as a 
    power back there'd be little left.  Call it the Earl Campbell syndrome. 
    Added to that worry is the fact that he's not that young; he was an 
    older JC transfer when he went through Florida St.  He's probably not 
    done yet and I'd also like to think that he's going to bounce back 
    shortly, but I also think that any hope that this guy is going to be 
    productive in, say, 1996, is a serious wet dream.  Which is why this
    Leonard Russell thing was not just a straight-up swap (regardless of
    whose fault it was; mostly Russell's, sure).
    
    glenn
    
56.1255They are differantCSLALL::BRULEWhatever you wantFri Oct 07 1994 18:2327
>>  But the Pats seem to protect the QB but can't do anything to help the run. 

>Pass blocking and run blocking are very different, but
>they are right, in that if you can pass block, you can
>ususally run block.

>Pass blocking is generally a matter of picking your man,
>and then going one-on-one against him.  It is simply a
>matter of who is stronger and quicker.  Run blocking is
>much more tecnique - a matter of getting yourself where
>you need to be, and keeping the other team away from the
>runner.

    I respectfully disagree with this. Pass Blocking is a lot more
    technique and is not always one on one blocking especially with the
    interior 3 linemen. (2 guards and Center). When the defenses stunt and
    blitz, pass blocking is 90 % zone blocking. It's a much more passive
    blocking which the O-linemen very rarely are able to deliver any
    physical blows and is mostly technique. 
    Run blocking is usually one on one blocking with an occasional double team.
    It's an aggresive block and much more physical then pass blocking. Your
    taught drive the man into the ground and the perfect block is driving
    your man onto his back. 
    Many college linemen come into the pros being able to run block but cann't
    handle the pass. 
    
    Mike
56.1256Gotta take the good with the bad with the Big Tuna I quessAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneMon Oct 10 1994 09:4820
    
    
     I'm going sit here and wait for Chappy to get in to take my 
    punishment.  I know that comment about mistake on the lake
    east was going to bite me in the but.  Oh well Pats er...
    Parcells choked we lost gotsta pay up.  
    
      I'm not one to put blame on any one person for a lost least
    of all the coach but what was with the first and goal from
    the 4 series?  I know he has to build their confidence that
    they can run the ball but don't you do that when it is first
    and ten from around mid field?  After the second Raider penalty
    I knew Parcells was going to try to run it in (he was in by the
    way) Turner fumbled after extending the ball and landing on Butts
    helmet.  Just thought a swing pass to Turner was in order.
    
      On a positive note with the execption of the shuttle pas for
    the TD the D played all right.
    
    Jerry
56.125724661::LEFEBVREGrateful Dead roolz!Mon Oct 10 1994 10:303
    Turner put the ball over the line.  Shoulda been 24-21 NE.
    
    Mark.
56.1259METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Oct 10 1994 14:276
> Shoulda been 24-21 NE.

shoulda, woulda, coulda it still goes down as a loss.

The Crazy Met

56.1260MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Oct 10 1994 14:5314
    

     Two of Bledsoe's interceptions, including the one that was returned
    for a touchdown, were the result of his locking on to one receiver.
    The other INT was just an ill-advised throw. He almost threw two others,
    too. The kid is not a completely there yet, yesterday was all the proof 
    you could want. But the loss wasn't completely or even mostly Drew's
    fault. The running game is beyond pathetic. The officiating stunk.
    That *was* a catch and a fumble by Rathman in the 4th quarter. And
    for some reason Ray Crittenden has taken it upon himself to start a
    small streak of letting the game winning pass slip through his hands. 
    Yesterday was the second game in a row.
      
    
56.1261SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Mon Oct 10 1994 15:0516
    
    	Drew had a awful lot of passes deflected or knocked down at the
    line of scrimmage yesterday. Anybody else think the Defensive line
    is watching to see when he pats the ball? When he does, they jump
    because they know he is throwing.
    	On the interception for a TD, I saw the interview with Bledsoe.
    They asked him about it the INT. He said he not only threw it late, but
    had no speed on it, and lofted it out there.
    	Hey, if a team can't score from the 1 yrd line, given 3 chances.
    They deserve to lose the game.
    	In the 4th quarter at the Raider 35 on a 4th and 10 call. Why
    the heck did Parcell's punt the ball? The punt goes into the endzone
    so it only gained him 15 yrds in field position. IMO, he should have
    gone for the 1st down.
    
    Ron
56.1262They'll be allrightAD::HEATHStabler&gt;Grogan&gt;Zolak&gt;Eason&gt;BledsoeMon Oct 10 1994 15:3913
    
    
      I too thought the officiating sucked pond water but it went both
    ways so you can't use that as an excuse.  The Raiders played better
    when it counted and that is why they won plain and simple.  Next up
    is the Jets with a better than even shot at getting above .500.  
    This game hurt though coulda brought them into a tie for the lead
    but we are far from out of it.
    
     Yea as good as I think Bledsoe is and great he will be he has to look
    off more receivers than he did yesterday.
    
    Jerry
56.1263A few serious thoughts.....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Mon Oct 10 1994 16:2028
    
    
    
         Thanks Jerry.  :-)
    
    
            In all seriousness though guys. The Pats are definitely on the
    right track. A young team often hits this hurdle, it's when you play
    close games against good competition. You got to learn how to win. They
    are farther ahead in there 2nd year than I thought they would be. 
    
          If fan support stays there and Parcells lets Bledsoe learn from
    his mistakes this team could be a SB contender next year. They have got
    to abandon the running game though and just try scoring pts against
    this sorrier competition...ie NYJ,Cle,Indy,TB,. If they play down to
    the competition like they did against Cincy, they will never learn how
    to win.
    
         My Raiders on the other hand are at a crossroads. They have got
    all the talent there to be a SB contender now, but they keep making
    dumb coaching mistakes. I could coach that team bnetter than Shell is.
    It showed in the 4th 2nd and 29 and they run the ball? Tim Brown went
    ballistic after the play! 
    
       I'm glad we played the Pats this year and not next. :-)
    
    
    Chappy
56.1264CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sMon Oct 10 1994 16:2215
As kind of an outsider (ie not a Pats fan), here's my opinion.....

The Patriots have improved a lot from two years ago.  They're not there
yet, but they're closer than they have been.

From what little I've seen, Bledsoe is damn good -- and he'll improve and
mature into a fine pro QB.  They need a running game, but to me it sounds
like they need a running back -- the line might need a tad of improvement
too, perhaps.

You probably won't see playoffs this year (although you might), but definitely
next year for sure....


'Saw
56.1265MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Oct 10 1994 18:465
 >> -- the line might need a tad of improvement too, perhaps.

 >> You probably won't see playoffs this year (although you might), 
    
    That's it, Frank. Don't be afraid to take a firm stand.
56.1266WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Mon Oct 10 1994 19:027
    
    
    
       President (cam) WAY
    
    
    Chap
56.1267STAR::MDNITE::RIVERSribbitMon Oct 10 1994 19:1024
    I thought that Pats lost the game for themselves.  Their running game
    was sooooo poor even the color guy (Marv?) was practically incensed
    they tried it at that 4 yard-line touchdown effort. :)
    
    I'm wondering if perhaps they ought to try to run somewhere than the
    "make the hole in the middle of the line" -- I cannot recall seeing
    much of an effort to run around the outside anytime Butts got the ball.
    It also seemed to me that the blocking for the running game is about as
    non-existant as the running game. 
    
    I do not agree that the Pats should abandon the running game effort
    entirely -- a one-trick pony seems easier to defend against.  However,
    when it was failing them entirely yesterday, especially at the goal
    line, Something Else Should Have Been Done.
    
    I hate games like these.  It wasn't so much the opposing team was
    doing so good to win (the Raiders weren't playing all that well
    either), but that they were "less poor" than the loser.  Bledsoe was
    off.  Receivers weren't making catches they ought to.  A mediocre game
    to be sure.  
    
    Cheers,
    
    kim
56.1268CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Oct 11 1994 11:4715
| >> You probably won't see playoffs this year (although you might), 
|    
|    That's it, Frank. Don't be afraid to take a firm stand.

Well, it's not an unfirm stand.

I don't think they'll make the playoffs, based on their play and their
talent level, strengths and weaknesses.  But I cannot factor in the
possibilities, albeit remote, of a Buffalo or Miami utter and total collapse.

I was just acknowledging that possibility, but I guess I didn't express
it explicitly enough....

'Saw

56.1269SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Tue Oct 11 1994 12:0724
    
    	Parcells has got to stop being stubborn. Skene is out for the year
    now, give Chung a chance. Parcells has Bob Kratch playing left guard.
    Kratch started 6 years at right guard for the Giants. Move Kratch to
    his more natural postion on the right side. Put Chung back on the left
    side where he was a starter last year. Armstrong and Chung did a good
    job run blocking on the left side last year. Put them back togeter and
    see what happens. Kratch is more comfortable on the right side. Maybe
    putting him over there will open some holes on the right side also.
    	Parcells needs to be more creative on Offense. Last nights Giants
    game was a good example. Reeves calls a QB delay on 3rd and goal from
    the 3. Dave Brown goes into the endzone untouched. I'd like to see the
    Patriots use a shuffle pass once in a while, maybe a reverse.
    	On Sunday when they rushed the ball 4 times at the goal line and
    didn't score. Hey Bill, Ever think of putting Coates in motion? Your
    having problems running. Use your tight end as and additional lead
    blocker to gain a couple of yrds. If Coates and Turner can't clear
    a path for Butts to bull his way for a couple of yrds. Then they will
    never have a running game. Or, maybe try pulling your guard from left
    to right and pitch the ball back to Turner. The running game is non
    existent because it is just basic bull blocking up front with no
    creativity.
    
    Ron
56.127024661::LEFEBVREJerry Garcia is GAWD!Tue Oct 11 1994 12:113
    Is there a line yet?
    
    Mark.
56.1271SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Oct 11 1994 12:133
|    Is there a line yet?

How 'bout "If I could walk like that, they'd put me in irons".
56.1272MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Tue Oct 11 1994 12:414
    |    Is there a line yet?
    
    How about..."What's a nice thing like you doin' on a girl like this?"
    
56.1273FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Oct 11 1994 16:441
    How about..."I *LOVE* You!"
56.1274HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 11 1994 17:0214
  Pretty sloppy game all around. The players played sloppy, both coaches
screwed up, the refs made mistakes both ways, I thought I saw a cheer leader
fall down, and rumor has it that even the vendors were dropping hotdogs. Not a
pretty day out in Foxboro. 

  If it had been a rainy day in November or an ice game in December it might
have made sense but you couldn't ask for a better day to play football. 

  Still the Pats are an exciting team to watch. They haven't been this much fun
since they were playing in Alumni Stadium and Fenway Park. It's great having
a pro-football team in the area again that really seems to care about winning
football games.

  George
56.1275Had to get the good thing about the raiders inAD::HEATHStabler&gt;Grogan&gt;Zolak&gt;Eason&gt;BledsoeTue Oct 11 1994 17:3415
    
    
      Well lets put the bad news behind and concentrate on the Jets this
    week.  It is a TNT game so the whole country will be (or not be)
    watching.  I'm expecting a shake up on the O line this week with Skene
    gone.  Chung will dress this week and a starter next week.  His 
    return will strangely coincide will the return of the running game 
    and the Pats will be primed for the showdown vs the lowly 'Spots
    in Clevescum.  I expect the Pats to enact a little revenge on the
    thumpin the Jets put on 'em last time they met on Sunday night.  Drew
    will have another 400 yard day and will be edged out for his 2nd player
    of the week honors by an incredible day by Jeff Hostetler who throw for
    425 yards and 4 TDS going 28-36 with no picks.
    
    Jerry
56.1276METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 11 1994 17:366
yeah the outcome of last years Sunday night game should give the Pats
some extra incentive this time around. Will most likely be a sloppy
game by both teams.

The Crazy Met

56.1277I'm pretty happy with this team....TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinTue Oct 11 1994 20:0929
    
    
    
    	As much as I hate to admit it, I agree with Bob Ryan in today's
    Globe. The Pats went into the season projected to be a .500 team
    by most football watchers. Here the are at 3-3 and as 'Boob' Ryan says
    they are "right where the ought to be."
    
    	Give Bledsoe a little slack. He's a 2nd year QB who is putting up
    extraordinary numbers considering 1) at current point in his career and
    2) everybody in the stadium knows he going to throw the ball. The kid
    is going to be a little inconsistent at times and make mistakes. Teams
    are now changing their game plans to specically deal with him. As a
    result the wins are going to get harder now. Again, as Ryan said, he
    had an off-day but still managed 321 yards and 2 TDs!!!
    
    	As for Parcells, yes he does seem to have a major stuborn streak in
    him. I guess he can afford to be a little set in his ways this year.
    The team expectations are still being met for this year. and it does
    seem to be in his character to to not give up too quickly when things
    don't workout as they planned (see Scott Sisson lasted year). But I do
    hope he will try something different soon, in his search for a ground
    game. I'm hoping that Parcells will use the loss of Skene as an
    opportunity to revamp the offensive line. Give Chueng as chance back at
    his old position and move Kratch back to the right side of the line.
    And giving Croom as shot might not be a bad idea. Who knows....
    
    JimH
    
56.127830008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Oct 11 1994 20:166
    	The Pats are right on target for a .500 season.  If they had
    a coach like DAN REEVES they could win 9-10 games and make the
    playoffs, but we got the Big Sardine.  Hey things aren't all bad,
    at least the cheerleaders outfits are skimpier this year.
    
    				   /Don
56.1279sorry you guys didn't beat LABSS::MARLANDTue Oct 11 1994 20:405
    All I can say to you Patriot fans is be glad your not out here in
    Colorado rooting for the Broncos, then you'd have something to complain
    about. I'd also like to say that I think you have one hell of a
    quarterback, yea he makes a few mistakes but didn't all the great
    ones early in their careers?
56.1280Reeves sucks you know it CNTROL::CHILDSShe was a TWO-BaggerTue Oct 11 1994 21:334
 Ya that genuis Reeves looked great last night hey Slash???????

 mike
56.1281SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Wed Oct 12 1994 11:448
    
    	It was good to hear Tagliabue mention "Monday Night Football" and
    the Patriots in the same sentence. The only MNF game this year that
    has a team that was under .500 last year is the Bears. Who were 7-9
    last season. I look for the Pats to play Miami on MNF at Miami.
    Somewhere in December so that making the playoffs are on the line.
    
    Ron
56.128224-17 Pats and it won't be that close.AD::HEATHStabler&gt;Grogan&gt;Zolak&gt;Eason&gt;BledsoeFri Oct 14 1994 17:3611
      
    
      I just looked at the schedule and see that this is a 1:00 game.  I
    was all set to put up a fence this weekend.  I don't know where I got
    the stupid idea they're on TNT.  Oh well if I don't finish it by 1:00
    I can tell the wife I'm waiting for the cement to set or something.
    I expect a good game this week and for the Pats to win by at least
    a TD.  I also wouldn't be surprised to see Blair Thomas activated for
    this game and get about 10-15 plays out of the backfield.
    
    Jerry
56.1283HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 14 1994 18:2423
  The Pats do have a TNT game coming up in a few weeks. 

  Another scandal is brewing for the Patriots. The woman who ran their cheer
leader squad is bringing a suit against the Patriots for wrongfull termination.
She is claiming that last spring she was ordered by Patriots management to get
Dallas Cowboy Cheerleader type uniforms for the squad and to switch from a
variety of music, including rap, to rock. 

  The woman claims that when she inquired about why she had to drop the rap
music she was told that the audiences were mostly white. She said that when she
mentioned that not all the players were white she was told that players do not
buy tickets. 

  The Patriots front office denies that this type of conversation took place
and claims they let her go because she lives in L.A. and they wanted someone
local. They also said that she used profane and vulgar language at times during
cheerleader practice. The woman pointed out that if using that type of language
during practice was really an issue they would have to fire all the coaches
including Parcels. 

  When it comes to scandal, this team is snake bit. 

  George 
56.1284A non-issue if I've ever seen one24661::LEFEBVRETerrapin Station &gt;&gt; Sgt. PepperFri Oct 14 1994 18:333
    The only place at which this issue is scandalous is in the media.
    
    Mark.
56.1285SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Oct 14 1994 18:336
re: Cheerleadergate

That was Lisa Coles.  She came to the team when her 
boyfriend, Hugh Millen was quarterback.

I wondered why she wasn't back this year.
56.1286TNT Stinks... Come on ESPNMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 14 1994 18:388
    I just grabbed the schedule to see when the pats are on the late game
    and luckily for me its in the 2nd half of the season so it wont be on
    TNT but on ESPN... my lowsy stinkin cable dont get TNT, Just noticed
    that TNT has the last game thru WEEK9 then ESPN takes over on WEEK 10
    I was hoping TNT would only get 8 games and ESPN 9, oh well I'll only
    miss 3 more late games..
    
    							mab
56.128757045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleFri Oct 14 1994 19:256
    Uh, Earth to MAB:
    
    Games on ESPN or TNT are also shown on free TV in the markets of
    the competing teams.
    
    The Crazy Met
56.1288ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Oct 16 1994 19:245
56.1289HELIX::MAIEWSKISun Oct 16 1994 23:5313
  Really? Who?

  Only thing I see in this note for the past few days is a little
chatter about the cheerleader thing.

  Tough loss today, another close one. At least they are in each game,
one lucky break and they could have won.

  NBC really goofed up, we didn't even see the final field goal. They
must have missed it completely because they didn't even seem to have
a replay.

  George
56.1290Harris showed why he is a practice squad playerAD::HEATHStabler&gt;Grogan&gt;Zolak&gt;Eason&gt;BledsoeMon Oct 17 1994 11:4126
    
    
    Nobody that I know has jumped of the wagon.  So whats the big deal they
    played a terrible game and lost big deal.  I'm not sure if I'm the only
    one but I saw some positives in yesterday's loss.  Thomas ran for almost
    70 yards and seemed to play with a little fire in his belly give him
    some game conditions and he should be able to turn in 75-85 yards a
    game and that will take some pressure of the passing attack.  The blitz
    killed Bledsoe yesterday and with an average running game that would go
    away.  I'm hoping I've seen the last of Butts he has had ample time to
    prove himself and just hasn't stepped up.  Time for a change.  Rucci did 
    not seem to play as well as he was hyped (big surprise there) and I sort
    of hope Parcells lets Chung outa the dog house and gives him some time
    with the #1 offense the next couple of weeks and puts him back in the
    starting lineup.  Whats the deal with Timpson, they really could have 
    used him yesterday.  When Brisby went down early I new the passing game
    would be cooked and it was.  Will Mcstooge made a comment about the his
    injury early on in the pregame show and said the Patriot medical staff
    can't find the problem and made it sound like Timpson just didn't want to 
    play.  Who knows but they need him back.  What was the deal with Turner,
    he didn't see much action.  On one of the 4 and X Bledose hit Gash with
    a pass right in the hands which would have been a first down but he did
    not come up with the catch.  Did he get hurt too?  Or just resting him?
    
    
    Jerry  
56.1291"whimpin out"AIMHI::KCUMMINGSMon Oct 17 1994 12:1311
    
    
    RE;  What's the deal with Timpson?
    
    According to the Herald this am, he and Parcells had to be seperated at
    practice earlier in the week.  It kinda sounded like he pulled his
    hamstring or groin and told the team it hurt too much to play.  The doc stated
    it didn't appear to be serious although, the player has to determine
    how much pain he can deal with and not the doctor??
    
    sounds like he got p'oed at Bill and said he wasnt gonna play.......
56.1292Strange game...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 17 1994 12:5122
> NBC really goofed up, we didn't even see the final field goal. They
> must have missed it completely because they didn't even seem to have
> a replay.
    
    Yep, they missed it.  I still don't understand the FG decision.  Both
    the announcers at the game and a couple of talking heads I heard on the
    radio afterwards were crediting The Great Parcells with this smart
    decision to leave time on the clock and "give his team a chance to win"
    but I don't see how giving back 35 yards of field position from the
    onside kick for the desperation heave into the endzone accomplishes 
    this aim (yard-for-yard, the field goal is the easier play from 40+ 
    yards out).  Not that this was a critical play or anything, but it was 
    bizarre all the way around.
    
    As for the game, so much for the cliches of a couple of weeks ago
    about how "the old Patriots would have found a way to lose this kind of
    game".  This was as bad as it gets, a major (and somewhat unexpected)
    reversion to form...
    
    glenn
    
56.1293CNTROL::CHILDSDwayne Barry KNOWS!Mon Oct 17 1994 12:586
 cause Bledsoe's arm is stronger than Bahr's foot is the only thing that make
 sense....

 mike    

56.1294HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 17 1994 12:5912
  I guess the theory was that if they had run a few more plays and scored a
touchdown they would have had to kick off with almost no time left on the
clock. Even if they had recovered the off sides kick they would have been out
of field goal range. 

  By kicking the field goal then getting the ball back they would have had
about 20 seconds to move the ball a bit then get the touch down. Then they
could have attempted the extra point for a tie or gone for the win.

  Either way it was a long shot.

  George
56.1295MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Oct 17 1994 13:2517
    
      Plain and simple - the Jets threw something at Bledsoe that
     he could not handle. The blitzes that the Jets threw at Drew
     completely baffled him including the one where Lott was in his
     chest as soon as he pulled away from center. Everyone watching
     knew Lott was coming and all we could do was helplessly watch it 
     happen. Just awful. Chalk it up as a learning experience I guess.
     
      And it anyone needs to pointer on just how clueless Bob Ryan is 
     when it comes to pro football then read today's article. Ryan, who
     I guess is covering Bledsoe's butt, dismisses Parcells' notion that
     yesterday's game was a *BIG* game. Hey, Ryan! We're 0-3 in the div-
     ision now, loser! We'll lose on just about every tiebreaker if we're
     in the hunt for a playoff spot! Yesterday's loss was monstrous in
     those terms.
     
      Marshall Faulk - 22 carries, 64 yards. Nuff said.
56.1296SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Oct 17 1994 13:378
NOBODY was picking up blitzers yesterday.  The o-line
hit a new low, and with no receivers, the Pats were 
sending everyone out on pass patterns.

The bottom line, as I said all along, is that this is
a ~.500 team, with some talent, but a long way to go.

=Bob=  
56.1297TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Oct 17 1994 13:4326
    
    
    >  Plain and simple - the Jets threw something at Bledsoe that
    > he could not handle. The blitzes that the Jets threw at Drew
    > completely baffled him including the one where Lott was in his
    > chest as soon as he pulled away from center. Everyone watching
    > knew Lott was coming and all we could do was helplessly watch it 
    > happen. Just awful. Chalk it up as a learning experience I guess.
    
    
    	Care to explain to me why that is Bledsoe's fault (as you seem to
    imply, please correct me if I'm wrong) as opposed to the offensive
    linemen who didn't bother to block Lott???
    
    	You got to give the Jets credit for having an aggresive defensive
    game plan. The only other time I've seen the Jets play this year (vs
    the Bears) they played the same way. Lots of safety blitzes, plenty of
    pressure on the QB. I was especially impressed when the Jets DIDN'T go
    the NFL standard useless prevent defense down the stretch. IMHO, that 
    put the game away for the Jets.
    
    JimH
    
    P.S. anybody hear from JoJ yet????
    
    
56.1298CAMONE::WAYSailors, rest your oars...Mon Oct 17 1994 13:5113
In Parcells system, if he's using something similar in New England, is that
the RB will pick up the blitzing safety/corner/LB.  He has to be able to
read it, and make the decision.  No blitz, and he usually either sneaks through
the line into the soft area over the middle, or out into the flat.


Yesterday was a crucial game for the Jets and Pats.  Every report I heard
during the past week was that it was critical to both team's playoff hopes.

Bob Ryan (and I haven't read the article), must have his head up his dupa.....


'Saw
56.1300Half the O hasn't got a clue, if they can even be identified...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 17 1994 13:5822
    
>    Care to explain to me why that is Bledsoe's fault (as you seem to
>    imply, please correct me if I'm wrong) as opposed to the offensive
>    linemen who didn't bother to block Lott???
    
    The postgame observation I heard and agree with is that there were just 
    too many inexperienced people on the field (you can include Bledsoe,
    sure), not the least of which were the WRs who weren't breaking off 
    their routes, for there to be any kind of option in the approximate 
    1.5 seconds available against the completely unhindered blitz.  I 
    suppose Bledsoe could have audibled to a running play or screen pass 
    or something to avoid the beatings, but the 3rd-and-forever game 
    situations hardly called for it.
    
    The Patriots are in a lot of trouble on offense right now, and 
    Bledsoe's inexperience is a minor part of it.  The O-line is hurting 
    and hasn't been getting the job done regardless, they're down to 
    nothing at WR, and the "best" option at RB might be a guy who's played 
    a couple dozen live downs this year (Blair Thomas).
    
    glenn
    
56.1301In the entire scheme of things it's not that big a deal...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 17 1994 14:0315
    
> Yesterday was a crucial game for the Jets and Pats.  Every report I heard
> during the past week was that it was critical to both team's playoff hopes.
>
> Bob Ryan (and I haven't read the article), must have his head up his dupa.....
    
    On the other hand, Parcells talks one game (we have to win), and 
    coaches another (let's beat our heads against the wall with the running 
    game inside the 10, because we have to make it work sooner or later).  
    He'd probably never publically admit to it, but I think Parcells still
    has goals far beyond anything that happens this season.  In that
    context this game against the Jets isn't a "huge" anything.
    
    glenn
      
56.1302HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 17 1994 14:3316
  I agree with glenn. This team is in building mode and when you consider how
far they've come in the last couple years, they are doing just fine. I don't
think anyone in their right mind expects this team to win any titles. If they
make the playoffs fine but it's unlikely they would get much past the 1st
round. 

  This game was a good game for the Patriots because it was a chance to go to
the school of hard knocks and see what happens when you don't handle the blitz.
If later this season they straighten that out, then it will have been a
positive and successful experience. 

  I'm happy about the fact that they've been in each game they've played this
year. They haven't been blown out once. If they keep that up and end up around
.500 then that's fine.

  George
56.1303MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Oct 17 1994 14:4716
  >> He'd probably never publically admit to it, but I think Parcells still
  >> has goals far beyond anything that happens this season.
 
     In all honesty, I think that is really stating the obvious. No one
     realistically expects the Pats to go to the SB *this* season. That
     is an eventual goal. But the playoffs were/are a realistic expect-
     ation this season and a win yesterday would have been a big step in
     that direction. The goal I think for this season was to continue to
     make the transition towards the type of team that wins the critical
     games. That we couldn't win a critical game, I think is rather huge. 
     Ryan's premise is that we still have nine games to go *this* season
     so we can make up for yesterday's loss. Again, in terms of this season, 
     it was a huge game. It made us 0-3 against the division.
             
    
56.1304TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Oct 17 1994 15:3744
    
    
    
         >You've got 7 men coming and only 5 offensive linemen. The linemen
         >can't block everybody given the play called.
    
    		Plus two running backs, who would be responsible for
    picking up blitzes on passing plays, most of the time.
    	 
    	>.....One of the rushers is 
        > coming right in your face, you see him, you know he's coming but 
        > you're like a deer caught in the head lights. A veteran QB either 
        > audibles a quicker play (I wish he would called a QB sneak to the 
        > left) or he calls a timeout.
    
    		Its hard to call a play quick enough to beat a safety
    coming through the line quick enough to nail Bledsoe just as he gets
    the ball. And a QB sneak is kind of useless in an obvious passing
    situation, wouldn't you say. Face it, in the play you site as an
    example, Bledsoe didn't even have enough time to turn arround  for a
    draw play handoff. Yup, you've convinced me, definitely the QBs fault,
    even though the safety has to come between two O-lineman who didn't
    even try to slow the guy down...  A couple of weeks ago you were
    Bledsoe's case about squandering precious Time Outs. Now what do you
    want hime to do, call a TO every time a Safety shows a blitz???
    
    	You also used the term "veteran QB", something Bledsoe is not, in
    case you forgot. Yes, he is a young QB and he is learning. As far as I
    can remember, this is the first time in his 1 1/2 year career he has
    faced a D that can with so many safety and corner blitzes. Lets see how
    he adapts his game after a few more time of having his bell rung.
    
    	There were many reason why the Pats dropped yesterday's game,
    Bledsoe's poor handling of the Blitz is clearly one of them. But I
    would put it down the list behind some more obvious reasons (turnovers,
    general offensive inconsistenncy, stuborness on the head coach's part,
    lack of an NFL quality running game, etc....)
    
    	You just don't like Bledsoe, do you???
    
    JimH
    
    
    
56.130557042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Oct 17 1994 15:4510
Jets sacked Bledsoe 3 times but they were all in key situations.
The sack by Lott was a timing play on his part, brilliantly executed.
I doubt that more than 2-3 teams in the NFL could have stopped that
particular sack.

Jets are now 3-1 in division, beat Buffalo, Indy, NE, lost to Miami.

The Crazy Met

56.1306Well, if it was big, Coach should take some heat too thenEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 17 1994 15:4530
    
  >> He'd probably never publically admit to it, but I think Parcells still
  >> has goals far beyond anything that happens this season.
  >
  >   In all honesty, I think that is really stating the obvious.
    
    It is, but I was applying it specifically to this particular game.  I
    do believe that on a couple occasions that Parcells finally said enough 
    is enough, we're going try to run the ball in these goal-line and
    not-so-short-yardage situations if it kills us (and it did).  Maybe 
    another way to make the point is to say that if the goal of winning 
    this game was so big, it was a mediocre effort from the coach, too 
    [I wasn't commenting so much on Ryan, after reading his remarks his 
    point is completely different].  Perhaps it's rationalization, but I'm
    going the other way and saying that I'm not terribly disturbed by 
    losing this game if in the process the Pats were able to establish 
    something new with Blair Thomas, for example.
    
    On a related note, Parcells really is quite insufferable in defeat.  He
    hates the media and even though it's his employer that's selling these
    stupid postgame press conferences to Ch 4, he treats good and bad lines
    of questioning with almost equal disdain.  I'm still glad he's here
    because the most important thing is that he knows what he's doing, but
    if you come in as an impartial viewer with no rooting interest
    Parcells' attitude pushes you in the opposite direction.  No other
    coach could get away with such arrogance (and I'm generally
    anti-sports media, but this guy is way out there sometimes).
    
    glenn
    
56.1307MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Oct 17 1994 15:5123
    
    >> And a QB sneak is kind of useless in an obvious passing
    >> situation, wouldn't you say. Face it, in the play you site 
    >> as an example, Bledsoe didn't even have enough time to turn 
    >> arround  for a draw play handoff. Yup, you've convinced me, 
    >> definitely the QBs fault, even though the safety has to come 
    >> between two O-lineman who didn't even try to slow the guy down...
      
       Er, since when is 4th and 1 an "obvious passing down"? 
    
    >> A couple of weeks ago you were Bledsoe's case about squandering 
    >> precious Time Outs. 
    
       Wrong again. I was on his case for calling a timeout at the very
       beginning of a quarter. I still think it's stupid.
    
    >> You just don't like Bledsoe, do you???
    
       I like Bledsoe just fine. I'm just not as compelled to make up
       excuses for him.    
    
    
    
56.1308no sweatBSS::MARLANDMon Oct 17 1994 15:551
    The pats will beat the Jets in NE.
56.1309BIGQ::MCKAYMon Oct 17 1994 15:584
    Anyone know why Bledsoe never throws out of the shotgun?  Did Simms
    when Parcells was at NY?
    
    Jimbo
56.1310SOLANA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesMon Oct 17 1994 16:003
    Simms did.
    
    brews
56.1311HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 17 1994 16:0813
  I'm not convinced that Parcells is arrogant or hates the Media. I think
he's just lousy on TV. He was pretty bad as a commentator as well. When ever he
gets on camera in front of a mic he just freezes up. No big deal, the only
thing that matters is how he does running the team and there he's done really
well by winning with the Giants and taking the Pats from no where to .500 in
a couple years.

  As for the record, I doubt if they are even considering the division race
so the 0-3 record in the division is not important. Their 0-4 (or is it 1-4)
record in the conference and the head to head loss to L.A. are probably more
important if they are thinking about that last wild card spot. 

  George
56.1312SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Oct 17 1994 16:099
|    Anyone know why Bledsoe never throws out of the shotgun?  Did Simms
|    when Parcells was at NY?
 
I was surprised by that too, Jimbo.  The shotgun probably would 
have helped Bledsoe see the blitz coming.  It's probably a case
of "lets not hit the young guy with too many complicated things".


=Bob=
56.1313FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 17 1994 16:121
    At least they've won more games than the Cards.
56.1314HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 17 1994 16:1313
RE                       <<< Note 56.1309 by BIGQ::MCKAY >>>

>    Anyone know why Bledsoe never throws out of the shotgun?  Did Simms
>    when Parcells was at NY?
    
  Up until yesterday getting back and having time to throw wasn't a problem
so they didn't need the shotgun. It remains to be seen if it is going to be
a problem or if they can get around it with a few adjustments.

  I'd rather see the Pats stop the Blitz by developing a running game rather
than going to a shotgun.

  George
56.131557042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Oct 17 1994 16:426
Pats running, especially in those 4th and short plays was pretty bad.
Not sure why Parcells only tried a pass once in that situation. 

The Crazy Met

56.1316Stinkin' to high heaven....TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Oct 17 1994 16:4820
    
    
    	Was that play a 4th and 1? If so than yes, obviously it would have
    been a good call. Point taken...
    
       >I like Bledsoe just fine. I'm just not as compelled to make up
       >excuses for him.    
    
    		And where did I make any excuses for him???? I simply
    tried to point out there isn't much any QB can do about an untouched
    safety. I'm sorry, but if "everybody" in the stadium could see Lott
    was about to bliltz, then that includes the O-linemen that Lott is
    right in front off. They have to do something to prevent unhindered
    access to the QB. No excuses for Bledsoe on my part, I just like to
    spread the blame arround to all the guilty parties, not just the most
    obvious one. If Bledsoe was like a "deer in the headlights" then the 
    Offensive line were "dead skunks in the middle of the road."
    
    JimH
    
56.1317MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Oct 17 1994 18:5012
    	>> And where did I make any excuses for him???? 
    
           Pretty much all of .1304, up to and including the part
           where you erroneously called 4th and 1 an "obvious passing
           down and the part where you ever so sarcastically remark
          "Now what do you want hime to do, call a TO every time a 
           Safety shows a blitz???", is one big long excuse. It's
           Drew's responsibility, not the left guard's not the head 
           usher's, to recognize and adjust the play to the blitz
           OR call a timeout if he feels there isn;t time to adjust.
           He didn't. Period.
    
56.1318EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 17 1994 19:3119
    
> It's Drew's responsibility, not the left guard's not the head 
> usher's, to recognize and adjust the play to the blitz
> OR call a timeout if he feels there isn;t time to adjust.
> He didn't. Period.
    
    Are we talking about one play here, or the Jailbreak at San Quentin 
    scenario that persisted for much of the second half?  Bledsoe made
    some mistakes, certainly, but at some point no matter how long you
    defer the responsibility with timeouts or audibles someone is going 
    to have to pick up the pass rush with honest-to-god pass blocking on 
    obvious passing downs.  There were plenty of those situations where 
    it didn't get done... 
    
    Let's face it, the O-line's pass blocking was terrible.  That's not
    an excuse, it's a fact.
    
    glenn
    
56.1319TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Oct 17 1994 19:4028
    
    
    
    	Yes I admitted my mistake about 4th and 1. Sorry, I listened to the
    game on the radio, so I'm having trouble relating the play you
    described to what I heard on the radio. 
    
    	BTW, I did read a pretty good description of the play in Ron Borges
    article in the Globe. He pretty much lays the blame at the feet of
    Kevin Turner on that particlar play. "...Lott beat the Patriots on a
    blitz and sacked Bledsoe after both Kevin Turner and Leroy Thompson
    were unable to block him. Turner's job was to go in the flat, but Lott
    came open so quickly between Todd Rucci and Pat Harlow that he should
    have forgotten that assignment and stopped Lott.  Instead he threw and
    arm in his direction and drifted out into the flat..."
    
    	So while an aubible or a TO might have been called for, it wasn't
    neccessary. If Turner had picked up the blitz, as he should have, it
    was "his responsibilty, not Bledsoe's, not the head usher's, his. He
    didn't. Period."
    
    	No excuses for Bledsoe, just an observation that there were other
    Patriots who could have done a better job of protecting the QB. You
    fail to recognize that fact in your witch-hunt of a young developing
    QB.
    
    JimH
    
56.1321Most embarrassing play in football...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 17 1994 20:1917
>      Glenn - Turner, Thompson and a few others are quoted today as
>      saying that they had a hard time recognising the blitz. I can't
>      fault the o-line. The backs have to pick up the safety or the cb
>      when they come loose like that and more often than not they didn't.
    
    That's reasonable.  I was just lumping the pass-blocking RBs
    into the statement.  And Bledsoe had a very rough day, too.
    For starters, that fumbled snap on the first play from scrimmage had
    nothing to do with defensive pressure but was every bit as damaging 
    as any fumble or sack forced by the blitz.  I thought for sure we'd 
    hear from you about Bledsoe lining up under the guard in the final 
    seconds, too, but I think by that point Bledsoe was practically in a 
    coma (as were you?)  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
56.1322TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Oct 17 1994 20:3027
    
    
      > Jim, ball-busting aside, I read that Borges article and I
      >tend to disagree. What I remember, through a Samuel Adams
      >induced haze, was that Lott was on Bledsoe as he was pulling 
      >away from center. Turner didn't have time to react. No one
      >really did. Lott was quicker off the snap even than the Pats
      >offensive line. How he anticipated the snap count only he 
      >knows. 
    
    
    	Yes, I'm kind-of interested in finding out if the photo on the
    front of the Globe Sports section is from that play. (Turner looking
    for somebody to block while Lott hammers Bledsoe)
    
    	On the radio broadcast, the annoucers were commenting that the Pats
    had been going with a 2-count on most snaps. During one offensive
    sequence, the Jets were offside two consecutive plays simply because
    the snap count was greater than 2. I don't think there was any rocket
    science on the Jets part.
    
    	Also, like Glen I'm surprised the Bledsoe over Left Guard wasn't
    brought up today. He must have been in a major league daze by then!!!
    
    JimH
    
    
56.132357042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Oct 17 1994 20:346
The conscutive off-sides by the Jets were on the Pats offensive
series immediately following Lott's sack. Came in a situation of
3rd and short.

The Crazy Met

56.1324CNTROL::CHILDSDwayne Barry KNOWS!Tue Oct 18 1994 11:235
 Also Lott could have been using the game clock for help. If it's down to
 a few seconds chance are you can hit the snap correctly.

 mike
56.1325" AIMHI::KCUMMINGSTue Oct 18 1994 14:279
    
    
    
    Well, I dunnoo, was he off sides??  
    
    I thought he was off sides.  I mean, the guy was already three steps
    in the Pats backfield before anyone knew it.  I don't think Bledsoe
    could have taken more than a step and a half back when he got his bell
    rung.
56.132657042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 18 1994 14:347
> Well, I dunnoo, was he off sides??  

most certainly not.

The Crazy Met

56.1327PTOS02::SCHRAMMEThe STONES are in town, the STONES are in town!!Tue Oct 18 1994 14:525
    how is Leroy Thompson doing?  is he playing alot?  man, I am one of the
    few who still wishes he was a Steeler (especially with Foster out for 3
    weeks).
    
    Eric
56.1328Pats have too many Penn State guys in their offense...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 18 1994 15:2010
>    how is Leroy Thompson doing?  is he playing alot?  man, I am one of the
>    few who still wishes he was a Steeler (especially with Foster out for 3
>    weeks).
    
    He's looked very mortal without a topnotch O-line like the Steelers' 
    in front him.  I thought he was better than this; I really did.
    
    glenn
    
56.1329Figures there on a bye this week, NOt a great weekendMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Oct 19 1994 13:5531
    Cleveland may have just landed the Biggest break of the season, foster
    is out 3 weeks, so dont tell me this wasnt a big game for NE, the 3rd
    place WC team plays the 3rd place Division winner (Correct) this could
    be cleveland and the pats would have a shot a beating cleveland.
    
    Pitt without foster is in danger, they could lose the next 3 games
    without him and then when he returns they have Buffalo, Mia, Rai as
    well has Phil and SD down the stretch, cleveland over the next 3 weeks
    could all but clinch the division (And Likly will end up playing the
    3rd place WC team in the first round)....
    
    I dont think anyone is jumping off the patriots band wagon, well see
    how many NO SHOWS there are for the games and how the TV ratings do.
    The next 3 home game Miami, Minny and SD are all sold out and should
    get great ratings (WIn or Lose).  Everyone has Higher aspectations for
    there team then what they KNOW in reality more then likly wont happen.
    So what, the pats need to improve, thats 6 or more win this season,
    anything over that is Gravy, a Playoff game would be nice but isnt
    necessary for them to have a Successfull season.  Of course it would
    have been nice if there rookie WR Lee was in there gaining experience
    as well as Hawkins (building...).  I think there giving up on Chung
    too early as well, he's young and can do the job, if where building
    this is not a guy to give up on...
    
    They should be using Croom/Turner more, but isnt Thomas a young player
    as well... The WR's will get healthy over the next 2 weeks and NE gave
    Miami a damn good game in there first meeting so things could still get
    intresting...
    
    Hay this is alot better then watching all those missed FGs..
    									mab
56.1330HANNAH::ASHEand now... the end is near...Wed Oct 19 1994 13:583
    Watch for John L Williams and Bam Morris to pick  up the slack.  I
    don't think it's as disasterous as you make it out to be...
    
56.1331HANNAH::ASHEAll I wanna do, is chew some gumThu Oct 27 1994 18:112
    Someone give Doc a hard time for the Vikes-Pats game...
    
56.1332Gruesome...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 31 1994 12:2122
                                   
    Well, before Tommy gets all wound up again, Bledsoe stunk yesterday.
    Probably his worst game as a pro, all things considered.  Then again, 
    everyone else on the Pats looked like they were sleepwalking, too, 
    even Ben Coates.  And Parcells too.  I don't know what's happened to
    Parcells but he's doing some things I'd have never expected from him,
    and it's not as if that unpredictability is paying off.  That gamble 
    to pull out the stops in his own territory with a minute to go in the 
    first half seemed ill-advised, and he (or the defensive coordinator) 
    was burned badly with the blitz call that effectively clinched it for
    Miami in the second half.  But foremost among the difficulties is the
    total abandonment of the running game.  It just seemed like once again
    it was make a token effort with a few carries and then shut it down,
    even when the game was fairly close.  Is Blair Thomas back in a
    doghouse again?
    
    I still think that even though the Pats could be playing much better,
    there's a significant talent shortage on the squad.  There are a lot of
    holes, especially on offense...
    
    glenn
    
56.1333thank God I didn't pay for the tickets!!MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Mon Oct 31 1994 12:3610
    It was a nice fall day in Foxboro.....
    
    Other than that I can't think of anything positive to say about 
    the football game I watched.
    
    I spotted Slasher ogling the cheerleaders, but couldn't find Denny.
    
    
    
    billl
56.1334HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 31 1994 12:5220
  It appears that more blitzing is going on during Patriots games on both sides
of the line. The Patriots are blitzing which has helped their pass defense but
the down side is that Bledso is getting blitzed himself and he's not handling
it well. 

  Sounds like rookie problems. Well maybe sophomore slump is more appropriate.
I'm not ready to jump off the band wagon yet, I think that Bledso has the
talent and will learn how to keep from telegraphing passes to the defense and
how to find open men after scrambling a bit. He's got the basics and is good
if he can keep his timming, he just needs more experience at improvising.

  This was the 1st blowout and they were still within 20 points and probably
could have scored late in the game if Parcells had not decided that it was more
important to take Bledso down a couple notches by sitting him on the bench. 

  They'll be back. Who knows, maybe they will surprise the Browns next week.

  Still a fan,
  GO PATS!!!
  George
56.1335FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 31 1994 13:462
    My prediction isn't looking too good right now.  Pats and Cards both
    have 3 wins.
56.133630008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Oct 31 1994 15:0218
	That loud thud you heard around 7:30 last night was the sound of 
Volvos and BMWs driving off the bandwagon.  I figure there will be no 
traffic jams around Foxboro for the two December games with the Colts and 
Jests.  The Dolphins beat the Pats with a varation of two basic plays.  
Parmalee run and pass to Byars.  How many times can a team run the same 
play before the Big Sardine makes an adjustment to stop it?  The only 
highlights of the game were the referee getting conked on the head with a 
pass and the guy with the lime green disco shirt getting the snot beat out 
of him in the endzone near our seats.  Hey Billl, if you go to any more 
games don't look for us in Kritzy's parking lot because they joined the 
legion of independent lots who have raised their prices to $15.00.  Much as 
it pains me I'll pay $10.00 and make yet another donation to Kraft.  My 
guess is that the team owned lots will avoid the public relations disaster 
and not join the other greedy !@#$%^ in the $5.00 increase *this* year.  Mr. 
Macorini & Cheese will raise the prices *next* year and claim the increase 
is necessary to improve the team.

				   /Don
56.133730008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Oct 31 1994 15:097
    	One more thing.  I really wished the Pats would've raised their
    hands Roberto Duran style, cried "No Mas" and walked off the field
    about halfway through the third quarter.  If you're going to quit,
    really QUIT.  That way we all could've got home in time to see Married
    with Children.
    
    				   /Don
56.1338Was that black shirt a Raiders shirt?MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Mon Oct 31 1994 15:2319
	>>The only highlights of the game were the referee getting conked 
    	>>on the head with a pass and the guy with the lime green disco 
    	>>shirt getting the snot beat out of him in the endzone near our 
    	>>seats.  
    
    	Saw the first one.  Was watching through the binoculars and
    	the ref in question was laughing his butt off afterwards.
    	
    	>>Hey Billl, if you go to any more games don't look for us in 
    	>>Kritzy's parking lot because they joined the legion of 
    	>>independent lots who have raised their prices to $15.00.
    
    	Now you tell me.  We got there around 11:30 and feasted
    	mightily.  Why wouldn't the stadium lots have taken advantage
    	of the folks driving up and down route 1 and opened their
    	gates before 1pm?
    
    
    	billl
56.133930008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Oct 31 1994 15:3811
    	Billl, we got there around 12:15 and the Stadium lots were open
    then.  I heard that it's the State Police call as to when the lots
    can open.  After the game Denny wanted to watch that stupid 5th
    Quarter show.  There was The Big Sardine on the podium whining away.
    Well I had to go relieve myself and when I got back I see this big
    hairy Homer lookalike ape on the television screen.  It took me
    five minutes before I realized they had changed the station to watch
    the Simpson Halloween show and that it was not Parcells at the press
    conference.
    
    				   /Don
56.1340DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Oct 31 1994 15:564
    	With all the talk I heard about Bledsoe's brother (who was in
    	the lux box with Kraft), maybe he shoulda played.
    
    	Scott
56.1341Rollward, Slash! (I'll take your Colts tickets... ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 31 1994 16:041
    
56.1342ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsMon Oct 31 1994 16:204
56.1343Walsh/BYUHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsMon Oct 31 1994 16:297
Groaner,

The sleeper in this draft looks to be that Walsh kid from BYU. He's
getting a lot of ink locally with the Panthers talking about using one of
their firsted round picks for him.

TTom
56.134430008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Oct 31 1994 16:4913
56.1345FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 31 1994 17:091
    ASU spanked Walsh and his Cougars!
56.1346Big petted lipsPAKORA::DWALLACEHeid fu 'o' slammin doorsWed Nov 02 1994 19:394
    Wouldn't get too enthusiastic about spanking Bledsoe's arse - wasn't
    Timpson & Brisby sidelined ??
    
    Davie.
56.1347ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsThu Nov 03 1994 01:463
56.1348read Chung will startAD::HEATHNo please not Kevin KennedyThu Nov 03 1994 10:276
    
    
     We all still here.  We ain't gone anywhere.  Only thing is I'm waiting
    for the Big Tuna to annonce his big moves.
    
    Jerry
56.1349Song of the day: Changes25022::BREENGet these mutts away from meThu Nov 03 1994 13:349
    Turns out that the big "change" that Parcells made was to ban the press
    from practice this week.
    
    He then said "I just said 'changes would be made, not what changes'.
    You guys assumed and wrote players would be cut".
    
    This is sort of a Lusitania sinking in terms of the all out
    press-Parcells war on the horizon.  Given, the slack they gave him I'd
    look for a lot of venom when they finally go after him.
56.1350CAMONE::WAYDeath where is thy sting?Thu Nov 03 1994 14:1316
>    This is sort of a Lusitania sinking in terms of the all out
>    press-Parcells war on the horizon.  Given, the slack they gave him I'd
>    look for a lot of venom when they finally go after him.

Somehow, I don't think that the Boston media is quite as horrific as the
New York media, and Parcells handled them okay.

I heard part of his press conference last night.  He doesn't have a helluva
lot to work with, but knowing Parcells, I'll bet whatever changes he
makes -- might not be personnel, he just might go nuclear on the team
at practice this week -- will help.


'Saw


56.1351MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Nov 03 1994 14:2611
      Re where are the Pats fans?
    
      Groaner knows Pats fans are here, have been here and will continue
     to be here no matter what happens. That question is just some pre-
     game woofing on his part. To his credit, he did finally muster the
     nerve to show his face here immediately after yet another Browns
     loss to Elway and the Donks. If the Pats should win Sunday (not
     likely) I'm sure he'll crawl back in his burrow and emerge three
     months from now with his old standby of being overly busy.
     
    
56.1352ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsThu Nov 03 1994 14:386
56.1353exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Nov 03 1994 14:498
    
       The Browns are an 8 1/2 point favorite and it probably
      won't even be that close. There's a growing school of
      thought that teams now have the book on Bledsoe and can
      (and have) effectively neutralize him. Cleveland certainly
      has the personnel to pull that off. The one saving grace
      for Pats fans is that the Browns aren't all that much better
      off at QB.
56.1354exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Nov 03 1994 14:5317
 >> Somehow, I don't think that the Boston media is quite as horrific as the
 >> New York media, and Parcells handled them okay.

    The Boston media might be worse in some aspects than the New York media.
    It ain't as large but neither are there as many teams and allegiance to
    that single team in that single sport is much stronger up here. To coach 
    in Boston is to coach in a fishbowl. Ask anyone who has ever managed the
    Red Sox. His handling of the press after announcing that changes would
    be made is almost as bad as some of the personnel decisions that he's made.
    He gave me and just about everyone else up here the impression that some
    truly drastic changes would be made. Now, he's backing off probably be-
    cause he doesn't have the personnel to effect any meaningful change. Half-
    way through his second season and already his act is a little tiresome.


    
56.1355CAMONE::WAYDeath where is thy sting?Thu Nov 03 1994 15:0418
Well, I don't expect much out of them this season.   Parcells has got to
feel the same way.

They have no running game to speak of, and if teams have Bledsoe's number,
it's because he's passing so much.

I'd bet that he's working with "attitudes" this week, more than "changes".
He's "changing" some attitudes.

I've told the story of what he did to Jim Burt one afternoon, because he
didn't like his attitude, and I'd bet a few of the Pats might be feeling
that.

I'll probably watch the Pats game this weekend, since the Jints are on 
Monday night.....


'Saw
56.1356ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsThu Nov 03 1994 15:284
56.1357Speaking of "attitudes", Parcells' has been the biggest...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Nov 03 1994 15:3720
> Well, I don't expect much out of them this season.   Parcells has got to
> feel the same way.
>
> I'd bet that he's working with "attitudes" this week, more than "changes".
> He's "changing" some attitudes.
    
    I don't have a real problem with Parcells closing off practices this
    week.  That's exactly the kind of thing that bothers a self-important 
    media the most, any restriction of their god-given right to hang with 
    the team.  That still doesn't change the fact that in many instances 
    with no apparent provocation Parcells has behaved like a jerk, where 
    he just absolutely cannot be questioned on any legitimate matter of
    coaching or strategy, none.  I don't know if he was this bad in New 
    York or not but believe me if the Pats continue in this mode and don't 
    improve with a winning season by say next year, these Boston guys will 
    be ruthless, with a vengeance.
    
    glenn
    
56.1358MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Nov 03 1994 15:478
    
      re last
    
      Gee, that sums it up just about perfectly.
    
      re Groaner
    
      You're right. I was looking at Sagarin's line. That's 8 1/2.
56.1359take the 'spots!MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Thu Nov 03 1994 15:526
    >> The Browns are 3 point favorites, not 8.5.
    
    I don't know where you saw that, but if I was a betting man....
    
    
    billl
56.1360BIGQ::MCKAYThu Nov 03 1994 16:213
    Iceman aka Groaner, Pats will win outright.  I don't do p-names!
    
    Jimbo
56.1361ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsThu Nov 03 1994 18:474
56.1362finally a main speaks upFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Nov 03 1994 18:517
    Hey Paul, I'll take your bet.  give me the Pats and the points.
    
    It's funny how someone in Phoenix has to keep coming through for these
    Boston feigns.  First the Celtics' conference, not the Pats-Browns
    game.
    
    Mike
56.1363How can anyone predict the Pats25022::BREENThu Nov 03 1994 18:598
    Exactly; we don't have a lot of confidence in an erratic qb and an
    erratic coach.  We've nothing to boast about; perhaps we have a not
    unreasonable hope in the future but right now we can just be pure fans.
    
    But I have nothing against Cleveland, I'd be dishonest to rag on them.
    But I'd be a little concerned about just how good they are.
    
    Teams I don't like are Miami, Denver and Giants.
56.1364no points!ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsThu Nov 03 1994 19:0333
56.136525022::BREENThu Nov 03 1994 19:043
    See I've nothing against Dawgs so nothing to lose or gain.
    
    I think pats may rebound thought this week (see pool_94)
56.1366FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Nov 03 1994 19:301
    Add me in Paul.  I'll take the Pats straight up.
56.1367TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Nov 03 1994 19:599
    
    
    	For some strange reason, I too think the Pats are going to rebound
    this weekend and beat Cleveland.
    
    	Add me in to the Cleveland Pname bet!
    
    JimH
    
56.1368Pats Ryp the cack out of ClevelandPAKORA::DWALLACEHeid fu 'o' slammin doorsThu Nov 03 1994 21:017
    re: .1361
    
    Mark Rypien...hah !  He couldn't guide his pecker thru his flies !
    
    Pats to win.
    
    Davie.
56.1369Hurt or Help?SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Nov 04 1994 11:0412
Bill Parcells is in the hospital this morning.

He suffered from severe dizzy spell last night, and was kept overnight for
observation.  They will be running tests today to see when he'll be released and
if he can make the game this week.

First Coach Mac, now Parcells.  This team will break any coaches heart!

zamboni

As an aside, the guys on the radio commented that it could have nothing to do
with his awesome slim shape he is is now!
56.137030008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaFri Nov 04 1994 11:052
    	WARNING:  The Surgeon General has determined that coaching the
    	          New England Patriots can be hazardous to your health.
56.1371CAMONE::WAYDeath where is thy sting?Fri Nov 04 1994 12:014
Well, Parcells does have a heart condition, and perhaps that could be
what this is about, I don't know.

I hope he's okay.....
56.1372Whats the problem???SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Nov 04 1994 13:0411
    
    	I don't understand what the problem is here.......I get dizzy every
    once in awhile (after trips to the bar) and the only thing I have to do
    is get in bed.  Boy, just think, if I went to the hospital every time
    I got dizzy.....  ;-)
    
    	What a bummer though...now the Pats will be playing this weekends
    game "for the coach".
    
    WOOF!
    
56.1373ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsFri Nov 04 1994 13:076
56.1374shades of last weekFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Nov 04 1994 14:141
    C'mon Paul, don't start hedging on us already.
56.1375ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsFri Nov 04 1994 17:206
56.1376pats looked real bad (AGAIN) but cleveland wasnt much betterMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 07 1994 17:3416
    Well ONCE again the refs decided the outcome of the game...
    
    Pats lost for 2 reasons, BLedsoe/Refs.  You cant throw 3 Interceptions
    and 0 td's and ever expect to win a game, and nothing takes the wind
    out of the defense more then a bad call that lands the offense on the
    1yrd line.
    
    The defense just about gave up after that and bledsoe still could pass
    anything...
    
    I have a hard time beleiving that all this HORRIBLE play can have
    anything to do with them just missing BRISBY.... Yes when they were
    missing there #1 and #2 WR you can write that game off as a loss but
    when your only missing your #2 guy you better be able to recover...
    
    								mab
56.1377CAMONE::WAYTake me, subcreature!Mon Nov 07 1994 17:3615
I still can't get over the poor quality of the officiating this season.

Bad calls abound -- can it be that they ain't used to the new rules yet
and are hesitating?  No, I don't think so, because they seem incapable of
getting it right when they make the calls.

Jerry Seeman is standing by his guys saying that he's totally pleased
with the overall quality of officiating.  

I can't remember a season with so many bad calls, and this season ranks
up there with the last year of replay, which I've termed the season
of the non-call -- ie. don't call it, we'll let replay decide.....


'Saw
56.1378"no hands"AIMHI::KCUMMINGSMon Nov 07 1994 18:078
    
    
    	Yes Bledsoe had another mediocre performance yesterday!  However,
        their receivers were pathetic.  I could not believe how many DROPS
        they had.  You can't win games dropping balls left and right!!
    
        This team is in need of a top notch wide receiver.  Among other
        things.  Still a dy-hard Pats fan!
56.1379SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Tue Nov 08 1994 11:493
    
    	This mornings paper said that New England receivers dropped 8
    passes.
56.138030008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Nov 08 1994 14:515
    	I thought the Big Sardine said the Patriots were all set at
    wide receiver?  I guess when you don't have LT to bail you out of
    poor coaching decisions, winning football games is a little tougher.
    
    				   /Don
56.138124661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingTue Nov 08 1994 15:053
    Boy, it sure was a smart move getting rid of Russell and Fryar, eh?
    
    Mark.
56.1382MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Nov 08 1994 15:2510
   >> I thought the Big Sardine said the Patriots were all set at
   >> wide receiver?  I guess when you don't have LT to bail you out of
   >> poor coaching decisions, winning football games is a little tougher.
    
      All those Giants "fans" who are raggin' on Big Dan Reeves because
      he can't win with a mediocre team and a young, inexperienced QB
      ought to take a good look at what coach Bill is doing with essent-
      ially the same thing. It's a little easier to be a genius when you
      have LT, Carl Banks, Leonard Marshall, Pepper Johnson and the rest of
      great great defense and a pretty good offense to go with it.
56.1383CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Tue Nov 08 1994 16:224
Bill's never been the same after the heart operation.....


Dan will *always* be the same -- a loser.
56.1384Gives Reeves his dueBSS::MENDEZTue Nov 08 1994 17:116
    Dan Reeves has also had a heart operation.  BTW how can a team go from
    10 - 6 last year and then 3 - 6 so far this year and the coach get all
    of the blame?  Parcells is a good coach and so is Reeves.  Reeves has
    NEVER had the talent defensively that Parcells has had.  Defenses win
    championships.  Whether that is Reeves fault or not is open to opinion.
    
56.1385Not that those dopes don't deserve it most of the timeAD::HEATHDawgs rule Pats sipTue Nov 08 1994 17:136
    
    
    Saw what do you mean he hasn't been the same?  Was he at one time
    or another cordial to the media and not so thick headed?
    
    Jerry
56.1386Flip a coin as to where this franchise is headed...EDWIN::WAUGAMANBrowns rule, Pats SIP!Tue Nov 08 1994 17:3118
    In my mind there's still no evidence that Bill Parcells is a strong 
    talent evaluator, at least of players _before_ they reach his practice
    field.  I think based on this season's breakdowns you'd now have to say 
    that overall, the sum total of the last two drafts and off-season 
    signing periods has been subpar.  Contrary to some things I've heard 
    in here, the football media in Boston continues to cite George Young 
    as the primary force behind the Giants' drafts (regardless of whether 
    he has since lost his touch).  The Pats' GM role should be considered 
    something of an unknown and therefore a concern at this point.  There's 
    no reason to panic but a lot of these rough commentaries of "they're on 
    the right track" should be revealed for what they are: nothing more 
    than absolute trust in one man (a good man, but still only one man), 
    not accounting for any specifics.  The way it looks now the Pats may 
    not be on the right track.  It could go either way.
    
    glenn
       
56.1387CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Tue Nov 08 1994 17:476
>    
>    Saw what do you mean he hasn't been the same?  Was he at one time
>    or another cordial to the media and not so thick headed?
>    

I was being facetious....8^)
56.1388CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Tue Nov 08 1994 17:5123
There's no doubt that George Young is the "power" in New York Giantsland.
It's in his contract.

Wellington Mara did not want to let Phil Simms go this year, but he
was handcuffed because of George Young.

FWIW, and this is my opinion, George has really started taking himself
too seriously since the last Super Bowl win, and with the changes in
FA stuff recently, the game is swiftly passing him buy.

The Giants did very poorly hanging on to free agents this season.



As to Parcells, I remember his first year in New York and how poor it was,
and how he was at odds with the media and the fans and stuff like that.

Parcells will always be held in high esteem by Giants fans, because of what
he brought to the franchise.  But there were a lot of us (me included)
in the first year, who hated his guts...


Dan Reeves....nah, I don't even want to bother....
56.1389A free Agent WR, and a couple of RBs in the DraftMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Nov 08 1994 18:1030
    Yes but if you look at some of the other teams that would be considered
    in REBUILDING mode, the pats are leading the way.
    
    Washington-Wasted a pick on a Top Notch QB and there playing there
    		7th round man, Brooks as a RB stinks even there Kicking 
    		Stinks.
    Tampa Bay-Going NoWhere Fast (Alwasy seem to be rebuilding)
    Indy-Gained a RB lost there QB (Wont go anywhere without a QB)
    Cinncy-Had #1 pick and havnt improved at all
    Seattle-Might Be leading NE in rebuilding but had better RB's WR's and
    		Defense to start with.
    Rams-New Orleans-Again always seem to be rebuilding ?
    
    They took a shot on 2 RB's, Thomas and Butts so far both have failed.
    They took a shot on NOT going after a top notch WR, at this point it
    may have been a good decision becuase having a TOP notch WR this year
    may not have doen anything for them.  But next year they have to go
    after a WR, a Good/Great one.  There Defense, DL and OL are improving
    Bledsoe will continue to improve (Needs a better QB coach).  And
    Special Teams/Kicking seem more then adequet.
    
    It wont happen over night (Unless you have a stockpile of draft picks
    but no one wants to make the same mistakes Minny did with dallas).
    
    As a Native New Englander Im very Happy with the teams progress, sure
    Id love them to rebuild over night and win the next 3 superbowls but
    its not gonna happen....  I wish they made more of a move to move up
    in the draft last year (And went after Faulk) but hey shit happens.
    
    								mab
56.1390Maybe it's hidden, but I don't see the talent...EDWIN::WAUGAMANBrowns rule, Pats SIP!Tue Nov 08 1994 18:5522
> There Defense, DL and OL are improving
    
    Sorry, MaB, but I don't see any improvement _particularly_ in these 
    areas.  Not only hasn't there been improvement but there's been a
    backslide, and these were the supposed strengths of the team.  What's 
    a bit scary is that the few top performers (at least before this year)
    like Bruce Armstrong and Vincent Brown are getting up there in years,
    in football terms.  Pat Harlow has had injury problems and is
    reportedly having an off year for some reason.  The guys whom
    Parcells brought in in these departments (some of whom didn't survive)
    have been around the block a few times and can only be charitably
    described as stiffs.  The quality depth is going to have to come
    through the draft.  And so far the grade there is average, if that,
    even compared with what teams like the Colts, Bengals, and Seahawks
    have done (I do think those three AFC teams have more overall talent, 
    even if it is as yet underdeveloped).  One or two players a year on 
    average-- a Bledsoe, a Slade, maybe McGinest by next season-- doesn't 
    get you there.
    
    glenn
    
56.1391Only Time will tellMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Nov 08 1994 19:1829
    I think the Defense is improving, they have the talant I dont think
    the Defensive Coord is doing his job, when Buddy gets fired next year
    we should Hiring him as Def Cord in New England :-)
    
    We have a GREAT LB core and DB/S but the strategy/Defensive scheme is
    questionable.  The Offense L is banged up a bit and if Chung can get
    his act together (He does play OL right) they have some depth as well.
    
    Now why arnt the Pats winning, too predictable, Running Game still
    Stinks and Injuries.  Take away Coates and Brisby being out disables
    the pats from spreading anyone's defense and allows them to BLITZ
    more often.. Plus the DB/S are watching Bledsoe (Obvious by his leading
    the league in INT's) and when he PATS the ball they make there break
    on the WR's.  This is youth and coaching... So some Quality time with
    a Decent QB coach could help that out.... have you ever seen Bledsoe
    Lookoff at a WR's to draw the DB/S and throw the other way (Without
    patting the ball ?).
    
    Id say the Goal this year is to hit the 6 win mark and start looking at
    free agents.  The Draft wont land you anything (Unless you take
    chances).  Like Draft 4 RB's, the 2nd and 3rd round always seems to 
    produce 1 or 2 great RB's (Even if most end up being 1 year wonders).
    But hey take a shot, the Free Agent RB's will be no better then what
    you have now.  But I still think they could land a WR next year.
    
    Only Time will tell, but looking around the league I see MORE teams in
    worse shape then the pats (Then Teams in better shape).
    
    								mab
56.1392Going 'round in circlesMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Nov 08 1994 19:5217
    >> As to Parcells, I remember his first year in New York and how poor 
    >> it was, and how he was at odds with the media and the fans and stuff 
    >> like that.

       Unfortunately, this is Parcells *second* year and we may be worse
       than we were last year. What's worse is that there's no real evidence
       that we'll be better next year. If you want to point to any one thing
       that made the Giants great it was their talented defense and by most
       accounts that wasn't Parcells' doing - it was George Young's. We don't
       have a George Young. We have Bill signing Myron "highly flammable"
       Guyton and Bill "the swinging gate" Kratch to fat contracts. Bill
       may be a great coach and motivator but as a talent evaluator so far
       he rates a solid c-. Glenn's right, in that all of our best players
       are pre-Parcells and the jury is still out on a few of the young
       promising ones. The rest of the team is decidedly mediocre which
       is pretty much where we started.
56.139391 results; I'll try for 9225022::BREENTue Nov 08 1994 21:0621
Here are '91 results
					    pats
    					     win
 01  910901 INDY       PATS        07    16   01 00
 02  910908 PATS       CLEV        00    20   00 00
 03  910915 PITT       PATS        20    06   00 00
 04  910922 HOUS       PATS        20    24   01 00
 05  910929 PHOE       PATS        24    10   00 00
 06  911006 MIAM       PATS        20    10   00 00
 08  911020 MINN       PATS        23    26   01 00
 09  911027 DENV       PATS        09    06   00 00
 10  911102 BUFF       PATS        22    17   00 00
 11  911110 MIAM       PATS        30    20   00 00
 12  911117 JETS       PATS        28    21   00 00
 13  911124 BUFF       PATS        13    16   01 00
 14  911201 DENV       PATS        20    03   00 00
 15  911208 PATS       INDY        23    17   01 00
 16  911215 JETS       PATS        03    06   01 00
 17  911222 PATS       CINC        07    29   00 00
    					   ------
    				total wins    06
56.139491 pats results25022::BREENTue Nov 08 1994 21:1719
                                             pats
    	   favorite   underdog		     win=01
    (game 1 ????)
 02  920913 RAMS       PATS        14    00   00 00
 03  920920 PATS       SEAT        06    10   00 00
 04  920927 BUFF       PATS        41    07   00 00
 05  921004 JETS       PATS        30    21   00 00
 06  921011 S.F.       PATS        24    12   00 00
 07  921018 MIAM       PATS        38    17   00 00
 08  921025 CLEV       PATS        19    17   00 00
 09  921101 BUFF       PATS        16    07   00 00
 10  921108 N.O.       PATS        31    14   00 00
 11  921115 INDY       PATS        34    37   01 00
 12  921122 JETS       PATS        03    24   01 00
 13  921129 ATLA       PATS        34    00   00 00
 14  921206 PATS       INDY        00    06   00 00
 15  921213 K.C.       PATS        27    20   00 00
 16  921220 CINC       PATS        20    10   00 00
 17  921227 MIAM       PATS        16    13   00 00
56.1395What's my point; it got lost25022::BREENTue Nov 08 1994 21:197
    It just seemed that prior to parcells that the Pat's played hard in
    some games and key players were same-same as now: Vin Brown, Goad;
    
    More than anything this year they miss Russell big time.
    
    But only the Parcells mystique is saving him from a Berry kind of
    mob lynching
56.1396huh???BSS::MENDEZTue Nov 08 1994 22:026
    .1391
    
    How would a pat on the ball tip-off where bledsoe was going to throw.
    BTW if the db's are looking at when bledsoe is going to tap the ball...
    Wouldn't the wide receivers be wide open?  I don't get it....
    
56.1397just a thoughCNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthTue Nov 08 1994 22:557
 If a team's playing a zone defense they're not playing man to man so if you
 see him look into your area and then pat I'd say you'd call that a tipoff.
 Of course this deals mostly with shorter routes. If a man goes deep you
 dam well better be playing the man.......

 mike
56.1398PTOS01::JACOBRPres. of Hair-B-Gone Club fer menTue Nov 08 1994 22:578
    Was listening to ESPN radio Sunday night and they had Eric Turner of
    the Brown(spot)s(tm) on and he said that Bledsoe tends to watch only
    his primary receiver.  he siad it makes it much easier to get a good
    jump on th ball.  Couple that with a habit of patting the ball just
    before throwing, and it's a DB's feast.
    
    JaKe
    
56.1399CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Wed Nov 09 1994 11:3913
So it's Parcell's second year, big deal.  It's still early, and he didn't
have much to work with when he came in.

He signed players he knew -- most coaches do that -- look at the New York
Broncos.   



Regarding Bledsoe looking his receivers, that seems to be a common
young QB problem......(qv Dave Brown)


'Saw
56.1400the OL has to give them time to check offFRETZ::HEISERTHE BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, THE PATS SIP!Wed Nov 09 1994 12:572
    Beuerlein has been dragged through the mud locally because of the same
    problem: locking on 1 receiver.
56.1401-1FRETZ::HEISERTHE BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, THE PATS SIP!Wed Nov 09 1994 12:571
    Re: Pats SNARF!
56.1402TOOK::HALPINThe BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIPWed Nov 09 1994 13:2413
    
    
    	I think way too much is being made of this patting the ball stuff.
    Looking at his intended receivers all the way, forcing the ball into
    double/triple coverage, and nervous feet are Bledsoe's biggest problems
    right now.
    
    	I just have trouble imagining a pass rusher or a defensive back
    being able to contrate on what Drew is doing with his hands, while they
    are dealing with offensive lineman and defending pass routes....
    
    JimH
    
56.1403SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Nov 09 1994 13:4019
|   I just have trouble imagining a pass rusher or a defensive back
|   being able to contrate on what Drew is doing with his hands, while they
|   are dealing with offensive lineman and defending pass routes....
 
I dunno about that, Jimmy.  I agree that the things you 
mentioned are bigger problems than passing that ball, 
although the happy feet thang is new.  The thing is that
you may be surprised at what defensive players are taught
to key on.  I recall some time back reading an article by
Packer linebacker Dave Robinson, in which he said that he
would look at the knuckles of o-linemen in their stance.
If they were putting a lot of pressure on their knuckles,
and they were white, he knew a run was coming (the lineman
would be "firing out"), if not, it was a pass (the lineman
would be giving ground for pass protection).  If a linebacker
can get to that level, it wouldn't surprise me if a d-back
would read a ball pat.

=Bob=
56.1404MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Nov 09 1994 14:1222
  >> So it's Parcell's second year, big deal.  It's still early, and he 
  >> didn't have much to work with when he came in.

     Read your comments about George Young and Dan Reeves, for a Bostonian
     all of them could apply to Parcells. George couldn't hold onto his
     free agents?  Coach Bill lost his best receiver and running back to 
     free agency. I'm not crying because either are gone but the fact is 
     that they did go and Bill didn't lift a finger to stop 'em. Bill didn't
     have much to work with? Take a good look at the Giants. There ain't much
     there. You're pretty much where your talent dictates. Dan Reeves is un-
     flexible? Bill has him beat hands down in that department. Ain't nothing
     Dan could do to match Bill runnning it unsuccessfully 6 straight times 
     from the four yard line. Dan is 3-6. Bill is 3-6. I don't see a whole
     lot of difference between the two.
  
   >> He signed players he knew -- most coaches do that -- look at the New York
   >> Broncos.   
 
      How man ex-Broncos play for the Giants? Give 'em to us and we'll ship
      Kratch, DeOssie and Guyton back.
    
56.1405TOOK::HALPINThe BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIPWed Nov 09 1994 14:1422
    
    
>I dunno about that, Jimmy.  I agree that the things you 
>mentioned are bigger problems than passing that ball, 
>although the happy feet thang is new.  The thing is that
>you may be surprised at what defensive players are taught
>to key on.  I recall some time back reading an article by
>Packer linebacker Dave Robinson, in which he said that he
>would look at the knuckles of o-linemen in their stance.
    
    
    	I certainly wouldn't rule it out Bob, but I still think it would be
    difficult to do in practice. The example you site, is something they
    look for at the line of scrimmage, before the ball is snapped. Makes
    sense. But I have trouble picturing a pass rusher picking up that kind
    of detail while trying to deal with a huge O-lineman standing in his
    way? (Of course the way the Pats O-line has blocked recently, maybe
    that isn't an issue....)
    
    JimH
    
    
56.1406SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Nov 09 1994 14:1910
re: Parcells and his free agents

Well he did knuckle Maurice Hurst under, and got him to 
make a long-term commiment to the Pats.  The free agents 
he lost were not in a bidding war, but they were guys he
didn't want (obvious mistakes in the examples you sighted,
as well as Chris Singleton, who is now starting for 
Miami).

=Bob=
56.1407CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Wed Nov 09 1994 14:2313
>     Dan could do to match Bill runnning it unsuccessfully 6 straight times 
>     from the four yard line. Dan is 3-6. Bill is 3-6. I don't see a whole
>     lot of difference between the two.
  

Bill outcoached Dan in the most important game of their respective
careers.

In my book that will always make Parcells a better coach.


    

56.1408Broncos overachieved under ReevesBSS::MENDEZWed Nov 09 1994 14:477
    I heard an interesting question on a sports show yeaterday.  They
    asked if the players on a team or the coach on a team make the biggest
    difference of a successful NFL team?  I personally think that if you
    have the horses you have a greater chance at being successful.  Reeves
    is a good coach but not a great coach.  Every team he took to the
    Superbowl was an overacheiving team.  He had very little defense and
    an offense built around Elway.  
56.1409MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Nov 09 1994 14:479
 >> Bill outcoached Dan in the most important game of their respective
 >> careers.

    So the two teams were dead even in terms of talent and Bill's
    coaching made the difference? Do you honestly believe that?
    

    
56.1410SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Wed Nov 09 1994 14:5512
    
    	I think Drew Patting the ball before he throws it. Makes a diffence
    if you are a Free Safety in Zone coverage. In most Zones the free
    safety is the center fielder waiting for the ball. If Drew is looking
    left, then pats the ball, If I am the FS I'm going to start running
    left.
    	This could be why it appears Drew is throwing into double coverage.
    The guy was open in single coverage. Just that the FS read where he
    was throwing and got there about the same time as the ball.
    	
    Ron
    
56.1411CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Wed Nov 09 1994 15:0312
>    So the two teams were dead even in terms of talent and Bill's
>    coaching made the difference? Do you honestly believe that?


No, actually, the Broncos had better talent, to the line of 7 points....



    

    

56.1412yeah rightBSS::MENDEZWed Nov 09 1994 15:091
    Name those great players that the Broncos had on that team????
56.1413TOOK::HALPINThe BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIPWed Nov 09 1994 15:3016
    
    
    >	I think Drew Patting the ball before he throws it. Makes a diffence
    >if you are a Free Safety in Zone coverage. In most Zones the free
    >safety is the center fielder waiting for the ball. If Drew is looking
    >left, then pats the ball, If I am the FS I'm going to start running
    >left.
    
    
    	Yup, this makes sense. I was thinking the same thing while sitting
    here eating my lunch. If you can be watching who the QB is looking at
    you can easily pickup the 'pat'...
    
    JimH
    
                                                        
56.1414Maybe I'm cluelessBSS::MENDEZWed Nov 09 1994 16:126
    I don't know...  I think if a guy is looking at the receiver the whole
    time during the route;  It does not matter if he pats ball, stomps his
    foot, point to the receiver, scratch hisself, etc.....You will know
    where he is going to throw the ball....
    
    
56.1415SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Nov 09 1994 16:157
    
    	No, it works like this.....if he pats the ball once, its going to
    coats...if he patts the ball twice, its going to Timpson...etc...
    
    	Now, if he rubbs the ball................
    
    	The King
56.1416CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Wed Nov 09 1994 16:2411
>
>    Name those great players that the Broncos had on that team????
>

Hey, I'm just telling you what the line was.  The Broncos were favored
to win by a TD.  Everybody thought the Broncos were better than the
Giants....

Players they had who were no slouches were: Elway, Mecklenberg, M. Jackson,
Tom Jackson....  I'd have to go home and look at the tape to come up
with some more....8^)
56.1417CNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthWed Nov 09 1994 16:3615
 Frank, I think you're confused. As I recall the Giants were about a fg
 favorite in that game. Afterall they had beaten the Broncos during the
 year and were riding a 10 game winning streak. The second Giants'
 superbowl win against the Bills was teh game they enter as a 7 point
 dog.

 Great Bronco players at that time were Maclenberg and Dennis Smith as
 I recall. Can't think of any others.

 Current Bronco/Giants : Marshall, Treadwell, Deluiso, and Brooks that
 I can think of. You can have them all except Brooks for just Kratch
 as far as I'm concerned.

 mike
56.1418CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Wed Nov 09 1994 16:4412
> Frank, I think you're confused. As I recall the Giants were about a fg
> favorite in that game. Afterall they had beaten the Broncos during the
> year and were riding a 10 game winning streak. The second Giants'
> superbowl win against the Bills was teh game they enter as a 7 point
> dog.

Could be.  Perhaps what was fooling me was all the media hype revolved
around Denver and Elway, and nobody was paying much attention to the
Giants.  Perhaps that is why I thought they were the dogs....



56.1419Broncos (like entire AFC) didn't have the talent; let's face itEDWIN::WAUGAMANBrowns rule, Pats SIP!Wed Nov 09 1994 16:519
    
    Yeah, the Giants had only lost 2 games that year; the Broncos 5. 
    Considering that this game was at least close until the third quarter
    and that Denver then went onto bigger stompings at the hands of
    the Redskins and 49ers (for all the same reasons) I wouldn't draw too
    many conclusions from this one game.
    
    glenn

56.142030008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaWed Nov 09 1994 17:054
56.1421Denver did not have the horsesBSS::MENDEZWed Nov 09 1994 17:1914
    On defense there was Dennis Smith and Karl Mecklenburg.  The offensive
    line was undersized as well as the defensive line.  Mark Jackson,
    Vance Johnson, and Ricky Nattiel were completely overrated.  Jackson
    could not catch on with Giants later in career.  Johnson could not 
    catch on with either Minnesota or SanDiego.  Ricky Nattiel could not
    even catch on with lowly Tampa Bay.  The big running backs were Sammy
    Winder and Gerald Wilhite.  What??? you never heard of thos RB's???
    Little wonder...They were average at best.  Offensive line had Ken
    Lanier and an undersized center.  Oh yeah I almost forgot...Denver
    also had John Elway.  Didn't the Giants have LT, Carl Banks, Pepper
    Johnson, Jim Burt, Leonard Marshall, and a Huge offensive line.  They
    also had Bavaro, Morris, and Simms.  Not sure of the Wide-outs but
    I'm sure they were not as overrated as the 3 amigos in denver...
    
56.1422Joe Morris should have been the MVP that yearCNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthWed Nov 09 1994 17:4410
 Giants wideouts were Manuel, Bobby Johnson and Phil Maconkey.

 George Martin was also on the defensive line.

  o-line was the Suburbinites: Brad Benson,  Bart Oates, Karl Nelson,
  William Roberts and ????????


 mike
56.1423CNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthWed Nov 09 1994 17:462
and the great Harry Carson was an LB back then..........
56.1424CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Wed Nov 09 1994 17:4810
>  o-line was the Suburbinites: Brad Benson,  Bart Oates, Karl Nelson,
>  William Roberts and ????????

Billy Ard.....






56.1425Dan is pretty goodBSS::MENDEZWed Nov 09 1994 18:487
    Would it be safe to say that the Giants had much more talent than
    the Broncos???  And it could be said that IF the Broncos had somehow
    won the game that Reeves would have been the main reason?  As it was...
    The fact that Denver even made the superbowl tells you alot about
    Dan Reeves' coaching ability...
    
    
56.1426CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Wed Nov 09 1994 18:5611
>    Dan Reeves' coaching ability...

Dan Reeves is on a par with Dean Smith -- can't win the big one when he
gets there -- BUT WORSE than that is the fact that he is not at all very
good at making midgame adjustments.   All the best coaches do that well....


'Saw
    
    

56.1427Dean is in a class by himselfBSS::MENDEZWed Nov 09 1994 19:054
    reply -1
    
    Maybe but you have to admit that the talent that Dean has squandered
    is much greater than anything Reeves has EVER had.  
56.1428Still hope25022::BREENWed Nov 09 1994 19:5413
    I wouldn't pay much attention to comments by opposing players about
    "patting the ball" etc; this is just stuff.  If they get a real edge
    they keep it to themselves.  Bledsoe had a full season to reveal
    weaknesses and noone took advantage in first four games.
    
    One of the big problems was Parcell's choice to delay developing a
    ground game and go for two quick wins via the air.  Finally when no
    ground game could be established and receivers were all injured the
    Pats couldn't even pass the ball.
    
    But if the early success was legit then it could still be repeated. 
    Last year Pats won last four or so with only one going in.  If they
    can get to five wins with five games to go...?
56.1429weal AFC alsoCNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthThu Nov 10 1994 12:486
 so what was the magic back in Denver, Reeves' great coaching or Elway's
 great ad-libbing ability?  Also not to be left out of the equation was
 the great HFA that pile-it-high afford them.......

 mike
56.1430Dean, Dan: 1-1HBAHBA::HAASAnd this am the way it goes.Thu Nov 10 1994 12:568
In terms of sqaundering talent, Dean is truly in a class by hisself. To
come up with a team that matches some of Dean's choke jobs, you think of
the 'Skins losing to the Raiders about 10 years back or the Colts losing
to Namath.

In terms of accomplishments, however, Reeves aint on the charts.

TTom
56.1431They have their own note - use it!!!TNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Nov 10 1994 14:103
    Get this &*($_^)%(* Giants talk outta the Patriots note!!!!
    
    NAZZ
56.1432back to the original noteBSS::MENDEZThu Nov 10 1994 14:164
    Okay NAZZ...  The pats sip discretely
    
    So do the Broncos and Giants...
    
56.1433HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Nov 14 1994 12:5513
  YES!!!!! BIG WIN FOR THE PATS!!!!!

  Bledso broke the all time NFL record for passes and completions with 70
passes, 45 completions.

  Also, on one occasion he ran a bootleg and threw a touchdown. At least he's
getting out of the pocket.

  This team is coming along just fine. Playoffs next year, Superbowl the year
after that.

  GO PATS!!!
  George
56.1434Minny gave the game away...56953::HALPINWow!!! 45 &amp; 70Mon Nov 14 1994 12:5930
    
    
    
    	Pats upset the Vikings 26-20 in OT yesterday.
    
    	Vikings lead 20-0 in the first half.
    
    	Bledsoe set two NFL records yesterday:
    
    		Most pass attempts = 70
    		Most pass completions = 45
    
    	Bledsoe in the 1st half: 8-17, 72 yards, 0 TDs, 0 Ints
    	In the 2nd half (and OT) 37-52, 354 yards,  3 TDs, 0 Ints.
    
    
    	But as exciting as the game was, I have to say that the Vikings
    pretty much GAVE them the game at the end. If I were a Vikings fan I'ld
    be screaming for the head of the Defensive Coordinator today!
    
    	In the Pats last drive of the 4th period, score 20-17. The Vikings
    blitzed 3 straight times. Each time a Viking defender got into the
    backfield untouched. Drew just barely got rid of the ball each time.
    Then with 4th and 10, THEY DIDN'T BLITZ?????? Guess what, he hits
    Brisby for a 25 yard completion and the Pats go on to win the game.
    
    	Thank you very much Minnesota, we'll take it....
    
    JimH
    
56.143524661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Nov 14 1994 15:145
    The most impressive effort, to me, was the 4th and 10 late in the 4th
    quarter that Bledsoe completed to Brisby.  Serious gut-check for
    Bledsoe after getting hammered 3 consecutive plays in the pocket.
    
    Mark.
56.1436very disgustedANGLIN::WIERSBECKMon Nov 14 1994 15:279
    What is it going to take, just what is it going to take for teams to
    STOP USING THE PREVENT DEFENSE???
    
    I don't get it, I just don't get it.
    
    Vikes CHOKED big-time.  This game should never have been close.
    
    
    Spud
56.1437MKFSA::LONGLike your freedom? Thank a Vet!Mon Nov 14 1994 15:478
    This is the second time that I can remember of a Worn Moon 
    qb'ed team coughing up the old hair ball in Foxboro.  The other
    one was in 1991, I think, when McMurtry caught the game winner.
    
    I reminded Dr 00:00 of this and have yet to hear a response.
    
    
    billl
56.143830008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Nov 14 1994 15:518
    	Drew was hammered after at least 85% of the 70 passes he threw
    yesterday.  This keeps up and he will not make it to Christmas.
    Using the no-huddle was a pretty good halftime adjustment by the
    Big Sardine, but that no-huddle makes it hard to watch the fights
    in the endzone when the Pats have the ball.  Vincent Brown had a
    very good game yesterday.
    
    				   /Don
56.1439MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 14 1994 16:1112
    
       At least they finally figured out a way to get single coverage
      on Ben Coates. The way it started out, it looked like it'd be 
      another game with the receivers dropping easy passes, Coates
      getting quadruple coverage and Drew looking every bit the rookie.
      The adjustment at half-time coupled with Minnesota gagging made
      the second half quite enjoyable. As much as Bledsoe's performance,
      the performance of the D was specatacular. A solid win but how
      long are they going to play this gimmick offense before teams
      figure out how to stop it? Sooner or later they're going to have
      to learn how to effectively run a conventional offense. Unfort-
      unately, they don't have the personnel to do it now.
56.144030008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Nov 14 1994 16:325
    	Best hit of the game yesterday was the FOX sideline camera truck
    ramming into a cheerleader in the fourth quarter.  She was a trooper
    though and shook it off.
    
    				   /Don
56.1441SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Nov 14 1994 16:434
|    				   /Don

So I guess youze guys weren't one of the seven who lost
their season tickets for drunken rowdiness?
56.1442SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensMon Nov 14 1994 17:064
    
    Shame on you slasher.  Ida thought better of ya.\
    
    brews
56.1443Bet the D's not #4 overall this week :*oANGLIN::WIERSBECKMon Nov 14 1994 17:4313
    I have a lot of trouble blaming Moon for yesterday's loss.  The defense
    plain and simple caved in.  They looked lost out there.  This should
    have been an easy win for the Vikes.  You'd think with all the
    accolades Dungy gets, they would have adjusted a little better.
    
    Moon's passes were on target.  There were a couple of key drops by
    Palmer and Ismail that killed drives that could have put the game away.
    
    The Vikes D is vulnerable and the whole league found that out
    yesterday.  Luckily, they have the Jets at home next weekend.
    
    
    Spud
56.144430008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaWed Nov 16 1994 19:087
    	Anybody out there tape Sunday's game.  Denny Rieu would like
    a copy of it.  Unfortunately for him one too many Lite Ices in the
    parking lot and one too many freebies at the game left him unable
    to remember what a great game it was.  I kind of figured when he
    almost fell into my trunk that maybe he had one too many.
    
    				   /Don
56.1445CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Nov 21 1994 12:0114
I heard a part of the second half on the radio -- I was going to the grocery
store to pick up a few things.  On the way into the parking lot I heard the
Chargers score a TD to pull to within three, 13-10.

Coming out of the store, and pulling onto the road again, I heard it
was 23-10, and I thought, "Wow, the Pats are doing well".

When I got where I was going, I turned on the TV.  What a great game by
Chris Slade -- was he playing like a house on fire or what.


Nice effort!

'Saw
56.1446Sign of the times?MUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRMon Nov 21 1994 13:024
Don't think I've ever heard of a guy looking for the video of
a game he'd attended.  O brave new world...

Steve
56.1447HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Nov 21 1994 18:088
  Big win for the Pats yesterday. The Chargers have been beating everyone
and if the Pats can handle them they can handle anybody.

  When they lose the Pats seem to lose because of sloppy play and rookie
mistakes which are things that can be fixed.

  Contender next year for sure,
  George
56.1448FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Nov 21 1994 18:114
    Interesting article in yesterday's paper about Bledsoe.  I found it
    especially interesting when Parcells claimed Bledsoe has the 2nd best
    arm in his family.  His 16-year old kid brother sounds like quite the
    player.
56.1449SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensMon Nov 21 1994 18:138
    
    Don't want to rain on your parade, George, but the Chargers haven't
    looked nearly as good of late as they did earlier.  I think they've now
    lost 3 out of their last 4, and a once insurmountable lead in their
    division is now one game.  Still a good game for the Pats to win, but
    it's not like they beat the 9ers or Cowboys.
    
    brews
56.1450HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Nov 21 1994 19:0812
  Well earlier in the season the Pats beat the Lions after the Lions had beaten
the Cowboys. 

  Sure, the Pats are not ready yet, but the feeling I get is that their
problems can be fixed and Parcells is a guy who can fix problems.

  This is the most exciting time to be a Pats fan since the merger. The '85
Superbowl was a fluke, this team looks like they could be for real.

  I'm psyched,
  GO PATS!!!
  George
56.145130008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Nov 22 1994 18:546
    	Pats still need a good wide receiver, a good running back, a
    defensive lineman who can pressure the quarterback and a center and/or
    guard who can handle the heavyweight nose guards.  Don't be shocked
    if they lose the the Colts on Sunday night.
    
    				   /Don
56.1452FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Nov 22 1994 20:251
    sounds like almost a whole team.
56.1453Pats win 12-10MKFSA::LONGHey N.E., Keep RIGHT except to pass!!!Mon Nov 28 1994 12:445
    Nice reverse KOD, slasher.  
    
    
    
    billl
56.1454ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 28 1994 12:464
56.1455MUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRMon Nov 28 1994 13:008
Welcome home, Groaner.

Word is that Field Service now has a nine-month backlog of requests
for replacements of worn out next unseen keys.

Curiously, most of the requests are from Pittsburgh.

Steve
56.1456MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 28 1994 13:428
    This is ANOTHER HUGE week for the pats, there are 5 teams at 6-6 all
    fighting for a WC spot in the AFC, the NYJ and PATS play each other
    and the other 3 (Buffalo, Denver, Raiders) play Better(Record) teams
    in (Miami, KC and SD)... The winner of the NYJ/Pats game could have
    the edge on the last WC spot as the other 3 6-6 teams could all lose.
    (A pats win combined with a Raiders/Buffalo loss would be too much
    to ask for :-)...).
    								mab
56.1457HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Nov 28 1994 13:5913
  Finally a division win!!!

  Now the ice has been broken the Pats should pick up a couple more with both
the Jets and Colts at home. The Colts in particular should be frozen solid
by the end of the half.

  This is the beginning of something big. The Pats may never have won the
NFL championship but they will.

  Did they ever win the AFL championship? Seems they were pretty good back
in those days.

  George
56.1458CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Nov 28 1994 14:029
>  Did they ever win the AFL championship? Seems they were pretty good back
>in those days.

I don't think so, if memory serves me correctly.  My football encyclopedia
is at home, but it contains AFL from 1960 through the merger.  They did
play for it at least once I think.....


'Saw
56.1459ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 28 1994 14:395
56.1460btw - Why wasn't Brodie on SI's 5025022::BREENAnd what of the shaftMon Nov 28 1994 14:4113
    They won the AFL East in the snow at Fenway Park then went out to San
    Diego and got crushed 50-0 by Lincoln&Lowe etco.
    
    The next year they had only to best the Jets on thefinal day but a
    certain rookie qb was not to be denied.
    
    The Pats weren't good but used stunting and blitzing effectively with
    Nick Buoniconti  at mlb.
    
    Right about this time the AFL saw the merger and started spending the
    money to get parity except for Billy who had none.  Then when John
    Brodie was signed off of the 49ers roster a hasty merger was arranged
    with the return of Brodie part if it.
56.1461CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Nov 28 1994 14:4910
>    
>    The Pats weren't good but used stunting and blitzing effectively with
>    Nick Buoniconti  at mlb.
>    

I didn't know he played for the Pats first -- they must've traded him
to the Dolphins later.....


'Saw
56.1462MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 28 1994 14:505
    
      Folks, leave Groaner be. The poor guy is still clinging to
     a championship that a Cleveland team won thirty years ago
     as being the most recent. Just consider yourselves fortunate 
     that your situation isn't as desparate. 
56.1463ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 28 1994 16:323
56.1464ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 28 1994 17:122
56.1465HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Nov 28 1994 17:193
  They won last night. Beat the Colts with 4 field goals.

  George
56.1466I'll take tha pats over the Browns, one team is on the riseMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Dec 01 1994 18:1914
    Ya look at this note CRAWLING WITH bandwagon jumpers after a WIN.. NOT
    
    Pats fans no what they have, they have a great young team that should
    continue to grow and provide us with decent competative football over
    the next 3-5 years.  Will they get to and win the big one, who knows
    there's many teams that have never been to the NFL SuperBowl (Including
    the Browns) so we can hope but they could lose Bledsoe in what 4 years
    (I think he has an out clause somewhere down the line)...THen the run
    is over :-(
    
    I will actualy root for the Giants this weekend vs the Browns this
    weekend, I may even bet on the browns (That's a proven way to make a
    team lose)... 
    							mab
56.1467OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATThu Dec 01 1994 18:293
    
    You guys have been preachin that Pats are on a rise bs since Moby Dick
    was a minnow. When is it going to happen?
56.1468HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Dec 02 1994 12:4010
Re         <<< Note 56.1467 by OLD1S::CADZILLA2 "We be the Tools BAT" >>>

>    You guys have been preachin that Pats are on a rise bs since Moby Dick
>    was a minnow. When is it going to happen?

  It's happening. Next year they make the playoffs, the year after that they
win some playoffs, the year after that the superbowl.

  GO PATS!!!!!
  George
56.1469long termHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 02 1994 13:477
>  It's happening. Next year they make the playoffs, the year after that they
>win some playoffs, the year after that the superbowl.

This might be a p-name wager whose outcome a lot of us might not witness
:*(

TTom
56.1470ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 02 1994 14:1717
56.1471ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 11:3011
56.1472CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Dec 05 1994 12:124
I still think it was a good win by that Pats.  The outplayed the Jets, and
seemed better prepared.

Any time the Jets lose it's a good day....
56.1473ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 12:383
56.1474CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Dec 05 1994 12:462
Especially in the sense that it was really one of their first tests.
A game they needed, as it were....
56.1475They must keep the intensity up or the Colts will surprise themAD::HEATHCan the Pats duplilcate it???Mon Dec 05 1994 14:3925
    
    
     Paul...
    
      FWIW I too thought that Rucci foot was on the goal line and the Jets
    should have got the ball on 20 but the refs didn't see it that way and
    it is not the first blown call and won't be the last.  As far as band-
    wagon jumpers go I've been here all year and will continue to do so win
    or loose.  As far as the game itself thought it was a huge win.  D was
    excellent and the Offense was just good enough.  Thompson ran the ball
    very well.  I didn't see any difference in the O-line just a quicker
    set of feet out of the backfield which led to a more respectable yards
    per carry.  Hopefully Parcells will continue to use Thompson and go to
    Butts when its 4th and inches as thats all he seems to get consistanly.
    I'm not sure if it was just because the Jet receivers didn't adjust the
    patterns and ran them "to perfect" but the DB's where on them like
    white on rice all day.  They seemed to give up the underneath a bit
    more than I would like but bend don't break does seem to work more often
    than not.  Next week is the Colts and a win there gives the Pats a .500
    record which is about right where they're talent/experience is.  The
    Bills game is certianly winnalbe and will likely decide who gets the
    one of the last two wildcard spots.  At this point the spots have one
    just about locked.
    
    Jerry
56.1476MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 05 1994 14:4911
    
    
  >> Nice call by the ref on the downed punt that essentially won the game
  >> for the pats.
    
     Get real. The Pats dominated the Jets yesterday mainly because
     I was there. The Jets managed a measly 219 yards total offense.
     Take away the two Pats turnovers and this game is a *complete*
     laugher. I will grant you that there are a lot of annoying band-
     wagon jumpers calling themselves Pats fans these days but give
     credit where it's due - the Pats kicked butt when they had to.
56.1477CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Dec 05 1994 15:187
Regarding the line, the announcers on NBC said that Parcell's had worked with
them to get their butts out of the hole -- instead of blocking straight and
away, the linemen were turning, and plugging up the hole with their
big butts....


'Saw
56.1478what a guy!FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Dec 05 1994 15:311
    Tommy, you should have season tickets and go to every game.
56.147930008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Dec 05 1994 15:4116
	Hey MikeH, Tommy is serious.  He and Steve Kenney have not been to 
a losing Pats effort this year.  Anybody got two tickets for Sunday's Colts
game for these two guys?  The Pats defense has actually looked like they 
know what they are doing since the second half of the Minnesota game.  Late
in yesterday's game there was a commotion going on across the field from 
where we sit.  The whole section by the 5 yard line was up and yelling.  We
thought it might be a fight, but upon closer inspection we saw this very 
buxomy young lady with a very tight white blouse on, jumping up and down.  
Security came down and escorted her away,  Now unless she mouthed off to 
somebody my guess is she was ejected for having huge breasts.  That being 
the case, Busty Heart would never get past the gates.  If the Pats can win 
next week they may actually have a shot at the...

PLAYOFFS!  There.  I said it.

				   /Don
56.1480HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Dec 05 1994 15:5811
  The announcers kept point out how the Jets were dropping the ball a lot but
there were clearly other times when the Pats secondary had the receivers
shut down. Coverage was a problem early in the year, it seems that they
have made that correction.

  Now if they can beat the Colts in Foxboro they'll have it going right down to
the last two games. Beating the Bills up there following week there will be
tough.

  GO PATS!!!
  George
56.1481SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Dec 05 1994 16:0110
|	Hey MikeH, Tommy is serious.  He and Steve Kenney have not been to 
|a losing Pats effort this year.  Anybody got two tickets for Sunday's Colts
|game for these two guys?  The Pats defense has actually looked like they 

Hail, get them tickets for the Buffalo and Chicago games too.

Hmm, Buffalo and Chicago in December, what could be better
than that, Tommy?

=Bob=
56.148230008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Dec 05 1994 16:084
    	Rod Smith laid some serious hits on the Jets receivers yesterday.
    Could be why they started dropping the ball.
    
    				   /Don
56.1483ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 16:457
56.1484BIGQ::MCKAYMon Dec 05 1994 17:163
    I have a grinder invested on the Pats I hope I'm one of the two!!!!
    
    Jimbo
56.148530008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Dec 05 1994 17:304
    	Oh no, Jimbo picked the Pats.  8^(  I guess I'll stay home next
    Sunday and do Christmas shopping...
    
    				   /Don
56.1486BIGQ::MCKAYMon Dec 05 1994 17:506
    Nope that particular lunch was due to the Brownies "W" over the 
    Patsies.
    
    I think their going to win every week!!!!!
    
    Jimbo
56.1487A vote for RucciAKOCOA::BREENBut in the land of the One-eyed MenTue Dec 06 1994 20:3116
    A possible ruling by the ref on the Rucci play was that Todd downed the
    ball while in bounds and then with ball dead in judgement of official
    his foot subsequently scraped the line.
    
    The question here is the whistle.  The whistle is not necessarily to
    determine where momentum stopped in placing the ball, that a ball
    passed the plane of the goal to signify a touchdown.  However, perhaps
    the whistle must actually blow to signify the ball being dead.
    
    But sports is not supposed to depend on instant replay, slow motion
    views;  the view of an experienced, objective person should be the sole
    determination of a call.  Getting rid of instant replay was the best
    thing ever to happen to football and it's utter failure helped to keep
    it out of other sports as well.
    
    Now if we can just get rid of DH's
56.1488ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 07 1994 02:407
56.1489DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Wed Dec 07 1994 12:286
    	I have to disagree about the instant replay. Everyone with a
    	VCR can replay a down to his/her heart's content. On a
    	controversial play, a coach should have the option to look
    	at instant replay.
    
    	Scott
56.1490just say no to instant replayHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 07 1994 12:4420
The answer is not instant replay. It's better training, conditioning and
evaluation of the refs. Of course, having professional refs, instead of
part timers, wouldn't hurt either.

I don't like the idea of instant replay mostly because the rest of
football and all the other sports are totally dependent on human
judgement and this is the way it should be.

My one suggestion, in the interest of keeping the game going, is to
install some kinda electronic eye type device to determine first downs.
The idea of stopping the play to bring the chains in from the furthest
sidelines is a ridiculous waste of time. Put the ball down, gun it and
bingo everyone knows. If'n they can tell if'n a tennis ball being served
at 100 mph is a good or bad serve, they oughta be able to properly guage
a football laying on the ground.

Besides, the whole thing is dependent on the spot, which brings it back
to the human element.

TTom
56.1491ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 07 1994 13:054
56.1492"quite well" = outta businessHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 07 1994 13:2512
Yeah, it, the other rules and the rest of the league is long gone.

Also, there's no way to take these calls completely outta of the play. A
continuing problem will be when the ref blows the whistle afore thangs
are stopped. So what'd they do: long pause, review, re-review and then,
oh yes, the whistle had blown.

In baseball, the ump has to make judgement calls on every pitch.
Certainly, the refs can be adequately trained to make these calls. And if
not, get some new ones.

TTom
56.1493instant reply=DH=astoturf=helmet speakersMKFSA::LONGWed Dec 07 1994 13:335
    I'm with TTom on this one.  Leave the 'human' factor in and the
    'techno-weenie' factor out.
    
    
    billl
56.1494that's DG: Designated Geek ;-)HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 07 1994 13:360
56.1495CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendWed Dec 07 1994 14:0440
It's funny, this ref thing.

Clearly, this year, the officiating has been very poor.  I cannot remember
a year with more blown calls, more questionable calls, and more controversy.

Yet the League has circled the wagons, and are defending the refs with
everything they have.  If it weren't so sad, it would almost be humorous,
the tap-dancing that is going on.

A few weeks ago, when the Giants played the Lions, there were two extremely
controversial calls, late in the game and in overtime, that contributed to
a Giants loss.  The week following that game, Jerry Seeman, the head
honcho of officials, spoke about the controversial TD call late in the game,
putting forth a version of it that didn't coincide with anything any of
us saw, or most other folks either.   He wouldn't address the blown call
about the knee being down in OT, but at the end he summed up by saying that
overall he was extremely pleased with the quality of officiating in that 
game.

I began to wonder if perhaps Jerry Seeman shouldn't be peeing in a cup
just like all the players have to.

Since that time, I've seen the officiating go from bad to worse.  I've
seen calls that are bogus at best, and I've seen glaring errors in judgement.

To cap it off, last Sunday night on the way home late, I caught Bob Costas
on WFAN interviewing Paul Tagliabue.   Surprisingly enough, Tagliabue
is, overall, extremely pleased with the officiating.

He "debunked" the theory that the refs should be full time, instead insisting
that fact that men like Red Cashion and Jerry Markbreit are made better by
having other jobs -- jobs which require independence of thought and action,
and that makes them better refs.  

He again broke down the arguments for replay (which I'm against btw), and
in general defended the refs performance this year.


When all was said and done, it reminded me an awful lot of the drivel
that comes out of Digital manager's mouths.....
56.1496ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 07 1994 14:425
56.1497CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendWed Dec 07 1994 14:459
I might be a bit biased, but I felt that forward progress had stopped on 
that play, and that it wasn't a bogus call.

However, there are other's (Mike and the Mad Dog on WFAN) that feel
differently.   To say the least it was controversial.

I guess though, you could make the point that after the Calloway call 
in N'awlins, and the two blown calls in the Detroit game, that the Zebras
owed the Giants one....
56.1498SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensWed Dec 07 1994 14:467
 >     They can't get them all right, and now the odds are    the next
 >   critical missed call will be against the Pats and not    for them.
    
    Not true, Groaner.  We'll all have to chip in on a course in
    probabilities to explain it for you, but the odds don't change.
    
    brews
56.1499ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 07 1994 16:122
56.1500PAT SNARFFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Dec 07 1994 16:141
    
56.1501SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensWed Dec 07 1994 17:145
   > Gee, thanks for the probability lesson... what do you do, sales?!
    
    Welcome, but what does my job have to do with it?
    
    brews
56.1502Re. the Pats againAKOCOA::BREENBut in the land of the One-eyed MenWed Dec 07 1994 18:3911
    Are you saying Groaner that you heard the whistle blow after seeing the
    foot scrape the endzone line?
    
    And the issue is still:  Is the ball dead when the ref decides it's
    dead at which point he blows the whistle.  If the ref saw Rucci down
    the ball, in his mind everything that came after, including his blowing
    the whistle was irrelevant.
    
    I agree with another noter that said this play was a bad one to use in
    a game dominated by the Patriots defense in the last 25 minutes when it
    was there to be won and Pat's won it.
56.1503ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 07 1994 18:424
56.1504HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 07 1994 18:4410
RE    <<< Note 56.1503 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

>    No, I'm saying the Pats are done.  All the clowns that jumped off the
>    bandwagon about 5 weeks ago, hopped back on... they'll all be back off
>    again in a couple of weeks.

  You keep talking about this. Exactly who jumped off the band wagon? As far
as I can tell there's been plenty of Pats excitement all year long.

  George
56.1505Better sum as nunPAKORA::DWALLACEDigirolaWed Dec 07 1994 19:415
    I feel that instant replay has a place as a safeguard. It was used far
    too much before but if HC's were allowed only say 2 per game then I 
    think it'd please most people.
    
    Davie. 
56.1506tape down those ankles, PaulFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Dec 07 1994 19:492
    Groaner is jealous because he's been drooling over a spot on the Pats
    bandwagon.  
56.1507ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 07 1994 21:015
56.1508HINTFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Dec 07 1994 21:092
    There you go, messing up those probabilities again.  Think permutations
    and combinations.
56.1509DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaThu Dec 08 1994 15:216
    	Right now the forecast for Sunday is sunny and chilly.  I can't
    remember the last time all 8 regular season games were played in
    such nice sunny weather.  So you Midget fans going to credit Parcells
    for this?
    
    				  /Don
56.1510CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendFri Dec 09 1994 12:127
>    such nice sunny weather.  So you Midget fans going to credit Parcells
>    for this?
    
For what, the weather?  You've got to be kidding....

Everyone knows that the weather around here is controlled by Dr. Mel, of
WTNH-TV8, New Haven.....
56.1511HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Dec 12 1994 12:4726
  If the season were to end right now, the Patriots would be the #3 wild card
team. 

  Pittsburgh and San Diego would be the #1 and #2 division winners and would
draw a by for the 1st round of playoffs. Miami being 1/2 game ahead of the Pats
would win the East and play the Pats on the 1st day of playoffs (#3 division
winner v. #3 wild card).

  Cleveland would be the #1 wild card and would host #2 wild card L.A. in the
wild card game. L.A. would beat out the Pats for the #2 spot because the 1st
tie breaker is head to head play and the Raiders beat the Pats at Foxboro.

  According to the Boston Globe, the Pats can clinch a wild card spot by
winning their last 2 games against the Bills and da' Bears, even if K.C. beats
Miami tonight. That would give the Pats 10 wins and Since the Raiders and K.C.
play each other on the final weekend of regular play, only one of them can end
up with 10 wins. 

  The Pats even have a shot at winning the Eastern Division if they keep
winning and Miami falls apart. 

  GO PATS!!!
  George

P.S. Oh yeah, meanwhile there's that other Conference. Big scramble for their
#3 wild card with half the Conference tied at 7-7.
56.1512ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 12:512
56.1513TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 12 1994 13:2433
    
    
    	IMHO, the Pats continue to win in spite of Parcells' offensive
    strategy. Why would you elect to start the game with the wind to 
    your back, only to start the game (surprise!, surprise!) by calling
    a series of running plays, followed by a punt???
    
    	And how many people cringed when the Pats went for it on 4th and
    goal when they were only up by 4 in the 3rd period? It worked, but I
    would have felt safer with them just kicking the FG and getting the
    7 point lead at the time?
    
    	The defense played great again. It is amazing that these are the
    same guys that could defend a Pop Warner team the first month of the
    season!
    
    	Bledsoe is amazing too. At one point in the 2nd period, the TV
    announcers said he was only 3-14 passing. He then went 22-31 the 
    rest of the way (not counting the ones completed to the Colts :-( )
    to finish 25-45 for the game. The interceptions are a major problem
    for Bledsoe, especially throwing 3 of them inside their own 20 yard
    line (I can't remember the 4th interception...). He seemed to regress
    a little this week, getting another case of nervous feet in the face
    of the blitz.
    
    	How can the Pats have such a pathetic running game, when a team
    like the Steelers can lose Barry Foster and Bam Morris to injuries.
    Only to have John L. Williams come off the bench and run for 94
    yards???
    
    
    JimH
    
56.1514ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 13:473
56.1515CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 12 1994 13:4918
Yesterday was the first time in a long, long time the Giants were not
on TV.

WVIT-TV30, the local NBC affiliate, has this deal where call-in votes can
changed their scheduled game.  They had the Giants scheduled, but more
folks wanted to watch the Pats.

So I watched the game.  It was fun to watch.  Nice recovery by Bledsoe
after the INT.

Plus, I enjoy Beasley Reece.  My girlfriend knows him and his wife (used
to work with his wife) and she says he's very, very down to earth.  His
color commentary is pretty good IMO.

Coates is a Monstah!


'Saw
56.1516MKFSA::LONGMon Dec 12 1994 14:0718
    At least one of Bledsoe's INTs looked like a mixup b/w him and the
    receiver.  Receiver ran a down and up (and was wide open for a TD)
    while Bledsoe threw it like he was expecting a crossing pattern.
    
    He does bounce back well in the face of adversity for a youngster,
    though.
    
    Can anyone explain to me why the Colts defender was not called for
    faceguarding (I think that's what it's called) when Bledsoe threw to
    Coates down the middle?  The ball was underthrown (actually hit the
    defender in the back) and when Coates tried to get to the ball the
    defender, who wasn't even looking at the ball, ran right into Coates.
    
    The announcer gave an explanation, but the Legion was a little loud and 
    I couldn't hear the announcer.
    
    
    billl
56.1517CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 12 1994 14:1414
>    
>    The announcer gave an explanation, but the Legion was a little loud and 
>    I couldn't hear the announcer.
>    
    
Beasley said that if the defender has put up his arms, he would have b
been called.

They showed the replay, then the defender starts to put up his arms,
and Beasley goes something like:  "Oh my, well, he put his arms up, I guess
the ref blew that call...."


'Saw
56.1518CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Dec 12 1994 14:301
Beasley Reese roolz!
56.1519the genuis is better...CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 12 1994 15:007
>> Beasley Reese roolz!


 that's just because he's a patriot fan........

 ;^)
56.1520Ask Grogan about winds in FoxboroAKOCOA::BREENNCAA: Noxious Cabal of Avarice and ArroganceMon Dec 12 1994 15:1110
    one reason to pick the wind is that it tends to die down towards dusk.
    
    so having it in the 3rd period would be an advantage but by around 4pm
    it may not be anywhere near the same factor.  So it's worth taking and
    of course the other team is at a disadvangtage against the wind to
    start.
    
    But if Bill felt he had to establish the run to win yesterday and in
    the future I can't disagree.  Especially since I was up in Jefferson
    all day beyond the reach of Patriot tv or radio.
56.1521they need the HeimlichFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Dec 12 1994 15:261
    I don't believe San Diego will be a division winner in 2 weeks.
56.1522May yesterday not have been the last in Foxboro?MSBCS::GALVINR.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625Mon Dec 12 1994 16:236
    LAst night on WBZ sports final, Bob Kraft was on, and told Lobel that
    the league had told the Pat's to notify season tickets that the
    possibility of a Wild Card game, as well as Conference Championship
    game could be in Foxboro.  Keep them fingers crossed!!!
    
    RTG
56.1523ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 16:262
56.1524Just repeating what I heard!MSBCS::GALVINR.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625Mon Dec 12 1994 16:307
    Couldn't figure it out myself.....but the owner of the team mentioned
    what the league has told them.  Maybe Mr. Kraft was still in the clouds
    over having Unitas and Roger Clemens in his box for the game.
    
    RTG
    
    
56.1525WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountMon Dec 12 1994 16:349
    
    
    
         I believe if the Pats win the Division, And if Pitt and the AFC
    West winner get knocked off, the Pats will host the Championship game.
    
    
    
    Chap
56.1526ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 16:475
56.1527EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Dec 12 1994 17:0017
    
>    I'm not convinced that if the Pats played the Browns in the AFC
>    Championship and the Browns had a better record but no division title
>    that the Pats would be home team.
    
    If the Pats were division champs I'm not sure how this would work (I
    thought homefield would go to the division champ) but this team need
    not be the Browns in any case.  It could be a lower wildcard.  It is 
    indeed theoretically possible for the Pats to host two games (I doubt 
    there'll be even one) because I hear that they are selling these 
    tickets in two-game packages.  That seems kind of sleazy, but on the 
    other hand I don't know how much leadtime potential playoff teams need 
    if all possibilities must be covered.  The timeliness of the refund is
    the key issue... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
56.1528SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Mon Dec 12 1994 17:0538
        Here is how the Patriots could host the AFC Championship game.
    
    	Playoff teams of (Pittsburgh, SD, Miami, Cleveland, Pats, KC)
    
    	The 3 divison winners automatically get seeded #1, #2, and #3. So
    the Pittsburgh/Cleveland division runner-up. Will be seeded #4, even
    though they might have a better record then the #2, and #3 seeds.
    
    	Round 1
    
    #1, #2 --- Have a buy week  (#1 Pittsburgh, #2 San Diego)
    #3 hosts #6 --- (#6 KC beats #3 @Miami)
    #4 hosts #5 --- (#5 Patriots beats #4 @Cleveland)
    
    	Round 2
    
    #1 would play #6 --- (#6 KC beats #1 @Pittsburgh)
    #2 would play #5 --- (#5 Pats beats #2 @San Diego)
    
        AFC Championship
    
    #5 Patriots hosting #5 KC
    
    	You would then have the #5 and #6 teams playing for the AFC
    Championship. Since the Pats were #5 seed they would host the #6 team.
    
        For all you Pittsburgh/Cleveland fans. They can not meet in the
    AFC Championship game. They will meet in round 2 because they
    will be seeded #1 and #4.
    
    
    	You could figure out another senario for Pats hosting a Wild Card game.
    If they win the AFC East and get seeded #3. They would host the #6
    wildcard team in round 1. If things worked out, they could host the
    AFC Championship game as well.
    
    Ron
                                  
56.1529CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 12 1994 17:064
A wildcard team, regardless of its record, cannot host a game, unless
it is the wildcard game.

Division winners always get the HFA.....
56.1530SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensMon Dec 12 1994 17:504
    The Cardinals somehow got the same letter.  Maybe it's just a form
    letter from the NFL.
    
    brews
56.1531ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 17:555
56.1532MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Dec 12 1994 18:1515
    
    
    A wildcard can host a game other than the widlcard round.
    
    #1 and #2 get byes.
    
    #6 beats #3
    #4 beats #5 (4,5,6 are wildcards)
    
    #6 then beats #1 and #4 beats #2
    
    Only 2 teams left are wildcard teams. #4 hosts the Championship game.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.1533DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Dec 12 1994 18:4914
	Got the letter in the mail on Friday.  The Pats are indeed selling 
a two game package.  For us the total is $196.00 with a $6.00 non-refundable
handling charge.  But the team will not mail out the tickets.  Should the 
Pats get a home playoff game (highly unlikely) the account owner has to go 
to the ticket office with a photo I.D. and pick up the tickets.  Oh, and Mr.
Macaroni and Cheese insists on a certified bank check or money order (no 
personal checks or credit cards).  Don't know if this is a league policy or 
if the team sets the rules, but either way Harry Sinden would be proud of 
it.  I got a kick out of the yuppies complaining about how cold it was 
yesterday.  Compared to last year's Colts game, it was a walk in the park.
My question to Kraft/Tagliague is, what is the $6.00 handling charge for if 
you don't mail out the tickets?
    
    				   /Don
56.1534#1 Versus #4 TheoryGRANPA::CCUMMINSWhat is the speed of dark?Mon Dec 12 1994 19:0414
    
      RE:.1528
    
      Pitt/Cleve Championship Game.
      
     If a lower seed (#6) wins their Wild Card game, then #1(Pitt) would
    play #6. While #2(S.D.) hosts #4 (Cleve). If Cleve and Pitt both win
    you have a #1(Pitt) versus #4(Cleve) Championship Game. 
     
     I realize I should've extracted the part I'm replying to know what
    the helium I'm talking about, but I'm not sure how .
    
                       Clark C.
    
56.1535The ultimate rhetorical questionAKOCOA::BREENNCAA: Noxious Cabal of Avarice and ArroganceMon Dec 12 1994 19:0715
    >!My question to Kraft/Tagliague is, what is the $6.00 handling charge 
    >for if you don't mail out the tickets?
    
    Slash,
    	You've got a great sense of humor... As if you don't know.  This
    scam about holding money and it's profitability is widespread in all
    sports and interest on this money should be paid.  This should apply
    to colleges too.
    
    	Another scam is the arrests of private citizens letting go of a few
    tickets at face value to protect professional scalpers both legal and
    illegal.  This lowers the respect for police and the cops don't
    necessarily see a penny of it.
    
    billte
56.1536CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 12 1994 19:1815
>    A wildcard can host a game other than the widlcard round.
>    
>    #1 and #2 get byes.
>    
>    #6 beats #3
>    #4 beats #5 (4,5,6 are wildcards)
>    
>    #6 then beats #1 and #4 beats #2
>    
>    Only 2 teams left are wildcard teams. #4 hosts the Championship game.
    
Right, I knew that.

I guess what I meant was before that....    

56.1537SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Tue Dec 13 1994 12:233
    
    	I stand corrected, the 'Spots and Steelers can meet in the
    AFC Championship game.
56.1538Kraft lookin' for somebody to build him a stadium?CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 13 1994 13:2511
Speakin' o' Mr. Mac&Cheese...

I heard something lasted week about Kraft whining about
a stadium in Boston.  He was claming the old saw about
"not beign able to stay competitive in Foxboro, blah, 
blah blah, just like Orthwine.  I couldda sworn that 
Kraft said when he bought the team, that he would keep 
it in Mass., no matter what.  Was thised guy just playin'
us, or what?

=Bob=
56.1539Unfortunately for Kraft he doesn't have leverage Orthwein didEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 13 1994 13:3620
                        
> I heard something lasted week about Kraft whining about
> a stadium in Boston.  He was claming the old saw about
> "not beign able to stay competitive in Foxboro, blah, 
> blah blah, just like Orthwine.  I couldda sworn that 
> Kraft said when he bought the team, that he would keep 
> it in Mass., no matter what.  Was thised guy just playin'
> us, or what?
    
    You always expect that kind of talk from any incoming owner, so I don't
    hold Kraft to a higher standard on that count.  Kraft has a slightly
    bigger credulity problem to overcome.  When he only owned Foxboro
    Stadium and _not_ the Pats, there was no need for a megaplex because 
    with just a minor owner-funded facelift Foxboro would become a
    wonderful place where children could be raised and mankind could live
    in peace and harmony.  After he bought the Pats he's "broke" and the
    picture is different...
    
    glenn
    
56.1540EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 13 1994 13:407
    FWIW, last night's win by Miami for all intents croaked the Pats'
    chances of hosting a playoff game (they really needed to be a division
    winner).  What day did those checks have to be in the mail?  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
56.1541FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 13 1994 13:501
    Pats didn't need to host a playoff game in '85.
56.1542CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendTue Dec 13 1994 13:5313
>    FWIW, last night's win by Miami for all intents croaked the Pats'
>    chances of hosting a playoff game (they really needed to be a division
>    winner).  What day did those checks have to be in the mail?  ;-)

What does that make Miami now, 10-4?

The best the Pats could do would be a tie with them, right, and the
Dolphins own the breakers?


'Saw
    

56.1543For practical purposes...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 13 1994 13:5812
    
> What does that make Miami now, 10-4?
>   
> The best the Pats could do would be a tie with them, right, and the
> Dolphins own the breakers?

    Miami is 9-5.  The Pats could still win outright but it ain't going to
    happen...
    
    glenn
    
    
56.1544MKFSA::LONGTue Dec 13 1994 14:011
    Never say never.
56.1545HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Dec 13 1994 14:2319
  Home games or no, that game came out better for the Pats with Miami winning. 

  The odds of Miami losing enough games and the Pats winning enough games for
the Pats to win the division were long at best. The Pats are better off having
K.C a game down which puts the Pats ahead in the wild card competition. 

  Before last night the Pats could clinch the #3 spot by winning both games.
Now if K.C. beats the Raiders in their last game the Pats can clinch the #2
spot by winning both games. Also it gives them a little more breathing room
should they lose a game, especially the closer against the Bears. 

  Before this game, a loss to the Bills would just about eliminate the Pats,
now the odds improve for them to get into the playoffs losing to the Bills and
beating the Bears. 

  If they lose them both I think they are out of it. There may be some really
odd combination that might save them but it would be pretty unlikely.

  George
56.1546CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendTue Dec 13 1994 14:283
After the game last night (I caught the tail end on CBS Radio) they said
that it was likely that the Pats had a wildcard spot.  For whatever
that's worth....
56.1547WhewwwWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountTue Dec 13 1994 14:4121
    
    
      Well Right now Buffalo KC, the Pats and the Raiders all control there
    own Destiny for the remaining "2" wild Card Spots??
    
      Raiders   have   @ Seattle  and KC at home
      Buffalo   has    Pats  and at INDY
      KC        Hou   and at Rai
      Pats             @ BUFF and @ CHI
    
      SD  wins the West with one Victory. They got @ Jets and Vs PITT
    Raiders can win the west with 2 wins and 2 SD losses
    
    Raiders clinch a WC with a Victory and a KC loss this weekend
    Pats Clinch a WC spot with A Raider and KC loss and A Victory
    
     Buffalo and KC can both get back into it by winning there head to
    heads against NE and LA
    
    
    Chap
56.1548DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Dec 13 1994 14:467
    	The folks I've sat with for the last 6 years are from Rhode
    Island and I told them I would love to see their state build Kraft
    a satdium for the Pats to play in.  That way I could still go to
    the games and the Rhode Island taxpayers could give Kraft his welfare
    checks for the next 30 years.
    
    				   /Don
56.1549Long way to go...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 13 1994 14:4913
> After the game last night (I caught the tail end on CBS Radio) they said
> that it was likely that the Pats had a wildcard spot.  For whatever
> that's worth....
    
    That statement is a bit strong.  One loss in a difficult road game at
    Buffalo and it becomes improbable (3 of 4 from LA, KC, Buff and Denver
    would have to finish 8-8 -- the Raiders are pretty safe and Buffalo
    would be in the driver's seat with only a final win against Indy
    necessary...)
    
    glenn
    
56.1550HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Dec 13 1994 14:5618
RE       <<< Note 56.1546 by CAMONE::WAY "I'll miss you, Rak, my friend" >>>

>After the game last night (I caught the tail end on CBS Radio) they said
>that it was likely that the Pats had a wildcard spot.  For whatever
>that's worth....

  Well, if they lose next week to the Bills it will be tough. Then the Pats
would be tied with the Bills at 8-7 having lost 2 head to head games (1st
tie breaker). They would have to beat the Bears and either the Bills would have
to lose, or L.A. would have to lose both games. 

  Of course San Diego losing both could draw them back into the mix.

  I think it all hangs on this upcoming game with the Bills. If the Pats win
then odds are they will make the playoffs. If the Pats lose, then they have
do beat the Bears and depend on other good teams losing to make the playoffs.

  George
56.1551CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendTue Dec 13 1994 15:032
Thanks for the clarifications, folks.  I don't get to see the paper often
and have no idea of the records of all the teams involved.....
56.1552Go PatsODIXIE::ZOGRANTestudo is still grounded!Tue Dec 13 1994 15:096
    For youse Pats fans, Kelly will be out (according to the reports here). 
    You get to face another great U of MD QB, Frank Reich.
    
    UMDan (who will root for the Pats anyway.  NO MORE BILLS!)
    
    
56.1553MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Dec 13 1994 15:157
    Head to head with Buffalo would only be relevant in a 2-way tie break;
    in a 3 or 4 way tie-break Buffalo could in theory be elimnated before
    reaching the head-to-head 2-way tie break. I believe that NE loses
    almost all tie-breakers that are division or conference record.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.1554DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Dec 13 1994 15:167
    	If the Pats don't beat the Bills they don't deserve to go to
    the playoffs.  But regardless of what happens in the next two games
    they will have taken a giant step from last year to this.  They
    still will not be a real contender until they get a quality running
    back.
    
    				   /Don
56.1555DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Dec 13 1994 15:2034
	Hey Paul, for someone who goes on about bandwagon tendencies, maybe 
you can clarify these two entries of yours...

				   /Don

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 56.1208       The Unofficial New England Patriots Note         1208 of 1552
ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..."    10 lines   5-OCT-1994 08:03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    
    I'm not a Pats fan, but Bledsoe looks to me like the real deal.
    If the Pats could add a few solid players over the next couple
    years via the draft and free agency, they could have a long run
    of years making the playoffs.  What they need is one really top
    notch RB, some OL help and Defensive help.
    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 56.1342       The Unofficial New England Patriots Note         1342 of 1552
ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The Donks are a premier NFL team, a" 4 lines  31-OCT-1994 13:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    
    Are there any good QBs coming out next season.  The Pats might have a
    shot at one.
    
56.1556strained CLFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 13 1994 15:251
    Kelly is gone for the year, even if they make the playoffs.
56.1557TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinTue Dec 13 1994 15:2930
    
    
    >Head to head with Buffalo would only be relevant in a 2-way tie break;
    >in a 3 or 4 way tie-break Buffalo could in theory be elimnated before
    >reaching the head-to-head 2-way tie break. I believe that NE loses
    >almost all tie-breakers that are division or conference record.
    
    
    	That's not really true, with a three (or more) way tie across
    divisions. The first rule in the three or more wildcard tie breaker:
    
    	"Step 1: Apply division tie-breaker to eliminate all but the
    highest-ranked club in each division prior to advancing to Step 2. The
    original seeding within a division upon application of the division tie
    breaker remains the same for subsequent applications of the procedure
    that are neccessary to identify the thre wildcard participants."
    
    	So if Buffalo, New England, Raiders, and K.C. finish the season
    tied at 9-7, Buffalo and New England would have the "Two Club Division
    Tie Breaker" rule applied first to seed them 1 & 2. A Buffalo season
    sweep would make them the team that advances to the next tie breaker
    rule against a West Division team.
    
    	Bottom line: If New England loses to Buffalo, they pretty much need
    the Bills to lose to Indy the following week to have any chance....
    
    JimH
    
    
    
56.1558DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Dec 13 1994 15:4911
	With the Patriots winning lately the media has had their snouts so 
firmly planted up the Big Sardine's ample posterior that if one of them 
sneezes Bill would get an enema.  All this flap about his December record 
should get a little more scrutiny.  Three of last year's victories were at 
home (Bengals, Colts and Miami) with the Dolphins being the only decent team 
in the bunch (and their entire starting secondary was out with injuries).  
This year he has beaten the Jets and Colts at home (not exactly the iron of 
the NFL).  So before we cannonize the Sardine as Mister December let's see 
what happens in the next two games.

				   /Don
56.1559CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldTue Dec 13 1994 16:089
 and the biggest part of that record was built while with the Giants who
 did win some meaningful games in december. I guess you just been beaten
 down so long by this team Don, that you'll wet noodle everything. I'd be
 more worried about Bledsoe's peerchant to throw the inty than Tuna's
 coaching ability. He's definatley not an offensive genuis but he does
 get his players' attention and they do come prepare to play. 

 mike
56.1560CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendTue Dec 13 1994 16:391
Hey, /Don, you want Dan Reeves?  You cain have him!
56.1561ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 16:564
56.1562SALEM::DODABill and Hill: Dual AirbagsTue Dec 13 1994 17:112
Not to worry, it'll pass quickly, much like Greg Swindell's 
career....
56.1563ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 17:173
56.1564MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Dec 13 1994 17:367
    re: .1557
    
    they must have changed that tie-breaker rule when they moved to
    the 3 wild-card scheme.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.1565PTOS01::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Sun Dec 18 1994 22:235
    Thank yew New Englund Patsies fer ridding the NFL of any chance of
    having to see the Baffalo BIlls lose they're 5th straight Super Bowl.
    
    JaKe
    
56.1566MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleSun Dec 18 1994 23:345
    A serious q. for Pats fans. Did you really prefer having NBC show
    the Dolphins-Colts game instead of the Browns-Steelers??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.1567MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Mon Dec 19 1994 00:3011
    Heard quite a bit on that subject on the AM radio driving all over 
    NH this afternoon and evening.  The majority of the callers called
    up complaining.  However, one saner voice called up.  He said any
    'true Pats fan' (whatever that is) wanted to see the 'fins-Colts
    game because it affected the Pats', still slim, playoff chances.
    
    Made sense to me.  Even if, as a diehard Steeler fan, I'd of rather
    had the Steelers on the tube.
    
    
    billl
56.1568ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Mon Dec 19 1994 01:278
56.1569MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Dec 19 1994 02:295
    hmm, Globe mentioned that they would use a split-screen format for the
    Pats postgame show. Not sure what they did.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
56.1570MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Dec 19 1994 11:247
>    Heard quite a bit on that subject on the AM radio driving all over 
>    NH this afternoon and evening.  The majority of the callers called
>    up complaining.  However, one saner voice called up.  He said any
>    'true Pats fan' (whatever that is) wanted to see the 'fins-Colts
>    game because it affected the Pats', still slim, playoff chances.

     How are their chances still slim ?
56.1571WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Dec 19 1994 11:296
    
    > A serious q. for Pats fans. Did you really prefer having NBC show
    > the Dolphins-Colts game instead of the Browns-Steelers??
    
    Definitely yes.  Meant much more to a Pats fan than the AFC Central
    bout.
56.1572CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 19 1994 11:5818
Pats looked really shaky in the first half, then lit it up in the second.

Nice adjustments by Parcells (are you watching Dan Reeves?????) and some
heads up defense.

I personally can't believe they beat the Bills by that much, but it was
nice to see -- I had to shut it off around 3pm to go to a birthday party.


Thanks to Indy they're tied for the division lead.


This team is interesting to watch -- it's all the football I've seen the
last two weekends because of when the Giants have/haven't been on, and they're
definitely interesting to watch.....8^)


'Saw
56.1573PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Dec 19 1994 12:316
    As a football fan, I'd much rather have seen the Browns/Steelers game. 
    As a 'Phins fan, I'd much rather have watched the Browns/Steelers game.
    
    :^)
    
    Mark.
56.1574This Pats fan's view...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Dec 19 1994 12:474
Absolutely no question in my mind - I'd rather have seen the 
Browns-Steelers than the Dolphoins-Colts.

=Bob=
56.1575TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 19 1994 12:4814
    
    
    	As at football fan, I preferred to watch the Browns-Steelers. I
    turned off the cable TV, and went to the rabbit ears to watch the big
    game on Channel 10 out of Providence. 
    
    	I did occasionally switch back to the 'fins/colts game though. Was
    anybody else surprised at the non-call on 4th & goal at the end? I was
    shocked that Shula didn't drive his little go-cart out on the field to
    explain to the ref that he was the chairman of the rules committee, and
    that they needed to throw a flag on that last play!!! :-)
    
    JimH
    
56.1577SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Mon Dec 19 1994 12:5013
    
    	The Patriots are still in a must win game next week @Chicago. I
    wouldn't count on the Raiders beating KC. Especially if Montana knows
    he is retiring, Joe will probably go ballistic.
    	A Pats win and a Dolphins loss gives the Pats the AFC East. Also
    if the Pats win the AFC East. If San Diego loses to Pittsburgh next
    week. The Patriots would have a buy week along with Pittsburgh.
    	The Patriots defense has been playing real well the last 6 weeks.
    I look for them to shutdown Chicago's conservative offense. The Pats
    opponants have only been coverting 20% on 3rd down the last 6 weeks.
    So Walsh should be forced into passing situations.
    
    Ron
56.1578MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Dec 19 1994 12:5422
  I believe you are right up to this point:

>  If the Pats lose to the Bears       -AND-
>     S.D. beats Pittsburgh            -AND-
>     K.C. beats L.A. 
>  Then
>    The Pats will be the #3 wild card and will play the #3 division champ
>      in Miami.
>
>  If the Pats lose to the Bears       -AND-
>     L.A. beats K.C. 
>  Then
>     The Pats would be out of it, Cleveland, L.A., and K.C. would be the wild
>       card teams.

   If the Pats lose to the Bears and KC beats LA, then the wildcards will be
   Cleveland, Kansas City, and Los Angeles, in that order.

   If the Pats lose to the Bears and LA beats KC, then the wildcards will be
   Cleveland, Los Angeles, and New England.  New England would definately be
   the #3 wild card; Cleveland would be #1 with a win or tie against Seattle,
   and #2 to LA with a loss to Seattle.
56.1579... with the correction mentionedHELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Dec 19 1994 13:0267
  Big win for the Pats!!! Looked a bit shaky at 1st but then the defense shut
the Bills down completely. Great game!!!

  It seems that depending on next weeks games, the Pats can finish anywhere
from the #2 Division Champ drawing a buy to finishing out of it completely.
This is kind of complicated but Here's the way I think it works. Someone
correct me if I'm wrong. 

  If the Pats beat the Bears          -AND-
     Miami loses to Detroit           -AND-
     Pittsburgh beats San Diego
  Then
    The Pats win the Eastern Division and draw a buy as the #2 division winner.

  If the Pats beat the Bears          -AND-
     Miami loses to Detroit           -AND-
     San Diego beats Pittsburgh 
  Then
    The Pats win the Eastern Division and host the #3 wild card team at Foxboro
      a week from Saturday

  If the Pats beat the Bears          -AND-
     Miami beats Detroit              -AND-
     K.C. beats L.A.
  Then
    The Pats will be the #2 wild card and will play the wild card game in
      Cleveland.

  If the Pats beat the Bears          -AND-
     Miami beats Detroit              -AND-
     Pittsburgh beats S.D.            -AND-
     L.A. beats K.C. 
  Then
    The Pats will be the #3 wild card and will play the #3 division champ
      in San Diego.

  If the Pats beat the Bears          -AND-
     Miami beats Detroit              -AND-
     S.D. beats Pittsburgh            -AND-
     L.A. beats K.C. 
  Then
    The Pats will be the #3 wild card and will play the #3 division champ
      in Miami.

  If the Pats lose to the Bears       -AND-
     Pittsburgh beats S.D.            -AND-
     L.A. beats K.C. 
  Then
    The Pats will be the #3 wild card and will play the #3 division champ
      in San Diego.

  If the Pats lose to the Bears       -AND-
     S.D. beats Pittsburgh            -AND-
     L.A. beats K.C. 
  Then
    The Pats will be the #3 wild card and will play the #3 division champ
      in Miami.

  If the Pats lose to the Bears       -AND-
     K.C. beats L.A. 
  Then
     The Pats would be out of it, Cleveland, L.A., and K.C. would be the wild
       card teams.

  Does that look about right?

  George
56.1580AKOCOA::BREENCome Monday...Mon Dec 19 1994 13:416
    1.  Yes, as a football fan the steelers - browns was the game and
    channel 4 was dead wrong changing.  Sheer stupidity on their part or
    worse.
    
    2.  LA plays after the Pat's.  Do they have any incentive to win if the
    	Pat's lose?  Are they already in the playoffs?
56.1581Uncle Al keeps chewin' on that straw, danglin from the precipiceNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 19 1994 13:4911
>    2.  LA plays after the Pat's.  Do they have any incentive to win if the
>    	Pat's lose?  Are they already in the playoffs?
    
    No (not a big one), and yes (if the Pats lose).  The Seachickens 
    sickened me last night.  I just know that if for the first time in my 
    life I'm forced to root for the Faiders, they'll loose.  Count on it.
    The Pats had better win...
    
    glenn
    
56.1582TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 19 1994 13:5124
    
    
    
    >2.  LA plays after the Pat's.  Do they have any incentive to win if the
    >	Pat's lose?  Are they already in the playoffs?
    
    
    	If the Pats lose, the Raiders are in the playoffs. The only
    incentive they would have is to get the W2 seed vs the W3 seed.
    It is easy to come to the conclusion that the Raiders would be better
    off losing and getting the W3 seed and playing either @Miami or
    @SanDiego in the playoffs. Instead of getting the W2 seed and having to
    play the Browns in Cleveland. I think it is pretty clear that Cleveland
    is the best of the three teams.
    
    	It is also pretty easy to picture Al Davis enjoying the idea of
    knocking New England out by tanking the game intentionally. :-)
    
    
    	K.C. on the other hand would have to win to get into the playoffs
    
    JimH
    
    
56.1583HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Dec 19 1994 13:5613
RE             <<< Note 56.1580 by AKOCOA::BREEN "Come Monday..." >>>

>    1.  Yes, as a football fan the steelers - browns was the game and
>    channel 4 was dead wrong changing.  Sheer stupidity on their part or
>    worse.
    
  Yah-but stupid all the way to the bank.

  They probably figured that they wouldn't lose any regular football fans and
all the new fans attracted by the Pats winning streak would be more likely
to watch the Dolphins.

  George
56.1584How big is the program that figured that out?MUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRMon Dec 19 1994 14:028
George,

it's plausible enough to me, but then, my eyes glaze over somewhere around
rule 36.

Didn't you leave out the stuff about the phase of the moon?

Steve
56.1585I was outa there....SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOMon Dec 19 1994 14:0413
>    1.  Yes, as a football fan the steelers - browns was the game and
>    channel 4 was dead wrong changing.  Sheer stupidity on their part or
>    worse.

	Yep, me too.  I unhooked the cable and hooked up the attena.
I much prefered a snowy Steelers-Browns game from Providence to the
Fish Squishing.  I woulda been very happy to just get updates from
the Miami game.

	Too many yuppies in these parts.  The Radio/TV stations 
cater to them, and it shows in their broadcasting choices.

	zamboni
56.1586CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Dec 19 1994 14:129
re: coverage

I wasn't watching closely, but it almost seemed like NBC was avoiding 
the issue of the Browns-Steelers. Every time they broke away to the 
studio, they did quick highlights of the Chiefs game or the Giants-Eagles
game, but avoided the Browns-Steelers.  The only updates I saw were 
through the "ticker".

=Bob=
56.1587WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MIthinkIhaveSAMBUKA poisiningMon Dec 19 1994 14:467
    
    
        Well me as a Raider fan would much rather have Joe Montana not in
    the playoffs! So even when the Pats lose I still think the Raiders will
    give the best that Art Shell allows! That game last night made me sick!
    
        Art Shell sucks!
56.1588CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 19 1994 14:489
>        Art Shell sucks!

The constant thing I hear about the Raiders is that they have tons of talent
but are one of the most poorly coached squads in the NFL....


'Saw


56.1589CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 19 1994 14:516
 but aren't Shell, Blitenkoff, Robiske and whomever just window dressing
 for Uncle AL, who's really in charge? I thought Davis was supposed to
 be a genuis? Maybe the game has passed him by?

 mike
56.1590WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MIthinkIhaveSAMBUKA poisiningMon Dec 19 1994 14:519
    
    
    
        Exactly Saw!  When you have the weapons you gotta use them! Art
    Shell is a Bill Parcells wanna be! 
    
    
    
    Chap
56.1591Here's hoping Pats and Chiefs bounce these underachievers...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 19 1994 14:5715
    
    I particularly liked the part where Art Shell called timeout at
    the end to make sure that the Seahawks would have an extra play to 
    place the ball exactly where'd they'd want it, and plenty of time to 
    get on the field for the potential game-winning FG... and they still 
    choked!  The intent was to leave some time at the end of the game 
    if the Seahawks scored but with some 35-40 seconds left it was far too 
    late for that.  The Faids figured that out and let the clock run down
    anyway.
    
    I didn't realize it before but from the last few weeks I've come to the
    conclusion that the "intense" Jeff Hostetler is a punk, on the field...
    
    glenn
     
56.1592WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MIthinkIhaveSAMBUKA poisiningMon Dec 19 1994 15:078
    
    
    
         I also loved with 1:10 left in the 1st half on your own 35 you run
    the clock out???  Don't practice your 2 minute drill you'll never need
    that!!!
    
    Chap
56.1593MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 19 1994 15:087
    
 >> Nice adjustments by Parcells (are you watching Dan Reeves?????) and some
 >> heads up defense.

    Yup. Nice adjustements by Big Tuna. Absolutely brilliant to adjust
    those key turnovers into the game after the Patsies took the momentum
    into the lockeroom by tying up the game at 17 after being down early.
56.1594TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 19 1994 15:1724
    
    
    
    	This version of the Raiders have to be the most undisciplined team
    in NFL history. The last time they were on national TV, they set a
    record for the most penalties in one quarter. At one point they were
    offsides on 4 consecutive plays!
    
    	What was the story with the O-lineman who got tossed lasted night?
    He must have punched about 3 or 4 Seahawks before the refs finally gave
    him the heave-ho. All because of a rather tame Seahawk celebration
    after a sack???? Way to help you team big guy!!!!
    
    	And the Raider timeout was a joke. Too bad the Flores didn't have
    the imagination or the guts to make them pay for it by going for the
    endzone one time. I think the running play he called lost a yard or
    two!
    
    	And all Shell does is stand on the side lines with a permanent
    disgruntled look on his face....
    
    
    JimH
    
56.1595At 17-3 something happenedAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberMon Dec 19 1994 15:2010
    Well somebody did something as the Bills were moving at will especially
    on the ground for the first 20 minutes.  I think the Pats wore down
    Buffalo and Thomas' injuries were a key.
    
    Hurst finally had Reich figured out but Frank refuesed to admit it and
    continued to try to throw that way.  But that fumble on the five was a
    big (and Lucky) break any way you shake it.
    
    Is it just me but does Hurst play single coverage about as well as any
    corner in the league?
56.1596MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 19 1994 15:269
    
  >> Well somebody did something as the Bills were moving at will especially
  >> on the ground for the first 20 minutes.  I think the Pats wore down
  >> Buffalo and Thomas' injuries were a key.
    
     An article in the Globe credits defensive coordinator Al Groh with
     recognizing and adjusting to a new blocking scheme that the Bills
     were using. The adjustments came after the Bills scored their 17th
     point. 
56.1597Pats have a shot at goin to the SuperBowlPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Dec 19 1994 15:276
  I'm not much of a Patriot fan and haven't watched them much this year, but 
  from what I saw yesterday, it looks like they're playin some of the best 
  ball in the AFC at this critical time of the season. I wouldn't be surprised 
  to see them play the Steeler's in the AFC championship game.

	Keith
56.1598TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 19 1994 15:5436
    
    
 > >> Nice adjustments by Parcells (are you watching Dan Reeves?????) and some
 > >> heads up defense.
 >
 >   Yup. Nice adjustements by Big Tuna. Absolutely brilliant to adjust
 >   those key turnovers into the game after the Patsies took the momentum
 >   into the lockeroom by tying up the game at 17 after being down early.
    
    
    	Tommy,
    		I don't understand why you choose to hammer Parcells in
    this instance. In another reply to mention you read the Globe article
    which credits Groh with changing the Defensive Line's formation to
    counter the Bills blocking scheme. The results were pretty obvious both
    from just wtaching the game as it was played, and by analyzing the
    stats presented in the article. After the Bills third scoring drive,
    the Pats defense game up big.
    
    		For all the hype the Network highlight shows gave to
    Bledsoe yesterday, it was completely missed that credit for the win
    over the Bills belong squarely in the lap of the defense.
    
    		So why the derisive comments about the "Big Tuna"? Because
    somebody gave him credit? Because his defense came through with 4 huge
    2nd half turnovers? (All those turnovers were 'forced' by the Pats, as
    opposed to 'here let me cough up a fumble for no apparent reason"
    turnovers). Are you pissed at Parcells because he has a defensive
    coordinator with the ability to make adjustments while the game is
    going on?
    
    		Why? Why? Why? I just don't understand you sometimes....
    
    JimH
    
    
56.1599SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Mon Dec 19 1994 16:0513
    
    	Al Groh made some blocking assignment changes and calmed down
    the Linebackers. The LB's stopped over pursuing the ball and strung
    out the line of scrimmage. Taking the cutback away from Thurman
    Thomas. I give Parcells credit for going with the no huddle in the
    2 qtr. Yes, The Pats were down 17-3 but the no huddle got the
    offense in sink and they started to roll, scoring 38 unanswered points.
    The Pats did what your suppose to do after a turnover, turn it into
    points. This was the best game both sides of the ball played all year
    long. The defense got the ball, the offense scored, giving the defense
    time to rest and take the ball away again.
    
    Ron
56.1600Drew the Main lived up to the hype in this one...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 19 1994 16:0617
>    For all the hype the Network highlight shows gave to
>    Bledsoe yesterday, it was completely missed that credit for the win
>    over the Bills belong squarely in the lap of the defense.
    
    I don't know about this, Jim.  Anybody can play one strong half of
    defense.  For the first time in several weeks I think that it's the
    offense that deserves credit for converting on those two TDs on 72- 
    and 64-yard drives when it was looking bad at 17-3.  If not for that 
    the Bills could have played grind-it-out football and the defense 
    might not have had the opportunities to force those turnovers.  Yes, 
    it was a team effort, but it was nice to see the roles reversed a bit 
    and show that either squad can cover the other if necessary.  Even
    Parcells acknowledged that this was Bledsoe's finest game as a pro...
    
    glenn
    
56.1601TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 19 1994 16:1417
    
    
    >I don't know about this, Jim.  Anybody can play one strong half of
    >defense.  For the first time in several weeks I think that it's the
    >offense that deserves credit for converting on those two TDs on 72- 
    >and 64-yard drives when it was looking bad at 17-3.
    
    	Yup, you're right Glenn. I guess I was thinking more how the game
    went in the 2nd half. Those two drives were big. But the defense turned
    in more than just "one strong half of defense". The Bill's 17th point
    came just 1:56 into the 2nd period. At that point I figured thatthe
    40-point barrier would be easily broken, I just got the team wrong.
    From there the Pats' D pitched a shutout. Almost 3/4's of the game....
    
    JimH
    
    
56.1602MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 19 1994 16:2111
    
       I don't know what's not to understand, Jim. Parcells deserves
      credit for teaching this team what it takes to win and for giving
      them the tools to do it. He deserves credit for drafting Bledsoe
      who at 22 years old showed yesterday that not only does he deserve
      to be in the Pro Bowl but he could end up as the best ever because
      this kid ain't even close to having reached his full potential. And
      Bill deserves credit for taking a team that ain't close to being the
      most talented in the conference to the brink of the playoffs. But Bill 
      don't deserve credit for some phantom half-time adjustments that he 
      didn't make.
56.1603TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 19 1994 16:3616
    
    
      >... But Bill 
      >don't deserve credit for some phantom half-time adjustments that he 
      >didn't make.
    
    
    	I agree. Somebody incorrectly credits Parcells, instead of Groh. So
    you blast Parcells??? I haven't seen, nor heard Parcells claiming
    credit for the defensive turn-arround. I don't understand why you 
    took a shot a Parcells in this case...
    
    	This is one case where you should have shot the messenger....
    
    JimH
    
56.1604CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 19 1994 16:3720
>      most talented in the conference to the brink of the playoffs. But Bill 
>      don't deserve credit for some phantom half-time adjustments that he 
>      didn't make.

Give it up Tommy.  

It doesn't matter who made the actual adjustment.  Parcells didn't have to
go over to Groh and say 'Gee, Al, you'd better make some adjustments otherwise
we'll lose this game'.  After Groh has been with Parcells as long as he
has been, he knows enough what has to be done in Parcells' system.

An adjustment was made, and I first noticed it in the second half, very
late in the first perhaps, but definitely in the second half.  So it wasn't
phantom, and it might just as well have been half-time if it was a tad
bit earlier....





56.1605CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 19 1994 16:4525
>    	I agree. Somebody incorrectly credits Parcells, instead of Groh. So
>    you blast Parcells??? I haven't seen, nor heard Parcells claiming
>    credit for the defensive turn-arround. I don't understand why you 
>    took a shot a Parcells in this case...
>    
>    	This is one case where you should have shot the messenger....
    

Okay, so let's say for the sake of argument, Groh sucks up the joint,
and his adjustment makes things worse.

At the end of the game is Parcells gonna stand up there in the news
conference and say "Well, we could've won, but Al Groh messed up the
adjustments and Buffalo ran roughshod over us".  I don't think so.

A head coach is like a commanding officer.  Even if he's in the bathroom
taking a leak, he's responsible for what happens.  Ask the CO of the
Vincennes....

As long as he's responsible for the bad, there's nothing wrong with him
getting the credit when things go good....


    

56.1606CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 19 1994 16:484
 besides the fact that Al Groh couldn't coach his way out of a paperbag when
 he was Ray Handley's DC.......he's either learnt a lot from that experience
 or is getting some friendly suggestions.............
56.1607To the point where only the coaches matter, like wif' Dean SmithEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Dec 19 1994 16:4918
    At the risk of putting words into his mouth, I think Tommy's reaction
    was as much to the praise of Parcells at Dan Reeves' expense ("are you 
    watching?") as to the unqualified praise of Parcells himself.  For the 
    fifth straight week, including in two tough road games in Cleveland and
    Philly, the Giants have won Parcells-style tough-it-out wars of
    attrition.  The conclusion is that not only has Reeves had nothing to 
    do with this, but that it has been done in spite of him.  It really has 
    become laughable.  These "adjustments" may or may not exist (Parcells 
    _explicitly_ stated in the postgame that it was more the case that the 
    defense started playing well than anything to do with adjustment) 
    but to the average fans like us those judgments are made superficially
    based only on the results (which isn't bad as long as you're
    consistent).  In these two cases the results are not all that 
    different...
    
    glenn
     
56.1608DZIGN::ROBICHAUDOne More One...Mon Dec 19 1994 16:524
    	Everytime 'Saw talks about Parcells I swear I can hear the strains
    of "Battle Hymn Of The Republic" in the background...
    
    				   /Don
56.1609haha good one Slash...but nothing to say about the Sardine?CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 19 1994 16:534
 better than Devo's Whip-it when he talks about Good Time Danny.........

 mike
56.1610MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 19 1994 17:2428
    
    
    re .1604

    >> Give it up Tommy.  

    >> It doesn't matter who made the actual adjustment.  Parcells didn't 
    >> have to go over to Groh and say 'Gee, Al, you'd better make some 
    >> adjustments otherwise we'll lose this game'.  After Groh has been 
    >> with Parcells as long as he has been, he knows enough what has to be 
    >> done in Parcells' system.

    >> An adjustment was made, and I first noticed it in the second half, 
    >> very late in the first perhaps, but definitely in the second half.  
    >> So it wasn't phantom, and it might just as well have been half-time 
    >> if it was a tad bit earlier....

       I think you're the one that ought to give it up, Saw. The Bills
       scored their last points 1:56 into the second quarter. The ad-
       justments that were made were made well before you say that you
       noticed them And while you're crediting Bill with making adjustments
       via osmosis, you ignore the fact that Big Dan and his Giants over
       came a 10-3 half time deficit and scored 10 fourth quarter points
       to keep themselves in the playoff hunt. Couldn't be that Big Dan
       made some "half-time adjustments", could it?
     

    
56.1611MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 19 1994 17:267
    >> I agree. Somebody incorrectly credits Parcells, instead of Groh. So
    >> you blast Parcells??? 
    
       I didn't blast Parcells. That's just the way that you choose to see
       it. I think that I merely pointed out the obvious.
          
    
56.1612TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 19 1994 17:4228
    
    
    
    >>> I agree. Somebody incorrectly credits Parcells, instead of Groh. So
    >>> you blast Parcells??? 
    >
    >   I didn't blast Parcells. That's just the way that you choose to see
    >   it. I think that I merely pointed out the obvious.
    
    
    	Well, I *said* I didn't understand!!! :-) You did use the term the
    "Big Tuna" which I took as sarcasm.
    
    	As far as the defensive adjustment in the 2nd quarter, it is pretty
    obvious to me that Groh was responsible for it. Bill involvement at
    that point would have been, "Al...DO SOMETHING!!!", or "yup Al, that
    sounds like a good idea, do it!"
    
    	Either way, the head coach is ultimately responsible for the
    success or failure of the team. And just because the Gints fans don't
    recognize that for their current coach, is no reason to take it out on
    their former coach....
    
    
    JimH
    
          
    
56.1613CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 19 1994 18:0331
Well, first off, I never advertised, promised, or implied objectivity.

I don't like Dan Reeves, I do like Bill Parcells.  The reasons should be
obvious.  I can list them if anyone really wants to hear them, though.

So, for obvious reasons (since we're all just stating the obvious in here
today anyway, cheeky lot that we are) all of my opinions concerning Dan
Reeves are what Mike Childs years ago aptly termed

		Personal Opinion Fueled by Personal Bias


Therefore, if Dan Reeves came out at halftime, set up a swimming pool and
walked on water, shot a fan in the head and raised him up from the dead,
turned all the gatorade in to Newcastle Brown Ale, and healed a few
thousand lepers, I'd still tell you I think Dan Reeves is a lousy coach
who couldn't coach his way out of a paper bag.

Conversely, I'm apt to give Bill Parcells a bigger bit of leeway.


I freely admit this, I'm proud of it, and if'n any of you don't like
it you can all osculate on my rather ample, opinionated, butt.


With that said, I think that the Pats are in a much better situation long
term with Parcells, than the Giants EVER will be as long as Dan Reeves
and George Young are around......


So there 8^PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPpp
56.1614DZIGN::ROBICHAUDOne More One...Mon Dec 19 1994 18:596
    	Okay Mike, if the Patriots make the playoffs I will upgrade
    Parcells from the Big Sardine to the Big Trout.  By the way
    congratulations on a very unexpected good year by your Giants. 
    Course we know the reason why, don't we?
    
    				  /Don
56.1615CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 19 1994 19:134
 if they win the next one I'll agree..........

 mike
56.1616For the record.....CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendTue Dec 20 1994 12:2118
I'll go on record here with this.....


If the Giants beat the Cowboys, whether or not Green Bay gives them a
hand getting into the playoffs, I'll congratulate the Giants on a year
that surpassed expectation.  

There were those of us who had them at 3-13, some (me) at 6-10.  9-7
would be very good overachieving accomplishment.

Further, it is obvious that Dan Reeves had at least a part in that,
despite some inherent flaws, he did a good job.


You heard it here first....


'Saw
56.1617earlier woulda been betterHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 20 1994 13:096
Real brave there Sawmain.

Emmitt goes down, Aikman stinks up the place and now you're chasing that 
Giants bandwagon. ;=)

TTom
56.1618CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendTue Dec 20 1994 13:1219
>Real brave there Sawmain.

Nah, just getting ready for the end of season wrap-up.


>Emmitt goes down, Aikman stinks up the place and now you're chasing that 
>Giants bandwagon. ;=)

If anyone really thinks the Giants are gonna win, I wanna run one of them
drug sniffing dogs around there house....

Giants did do better than expected this season -- even I, Dan-Reeves-Hater
extraordinaire have to admit that.  8-8 is still better than 6-10.

Now, granted, they only beat ONE, count 'em, ONE team with a winning record,
but 8-8, 9-7 is still better than 6-10.....


'Saw
56.1619Haven't used drugs in years... ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 20 1994 13:1412
    
>>Emmitt goes down, Aikman stinks up the place and now you're chasing that 
>>Giants bandwagon. ;=)
>
> If anyone really thinks the Giants are gonna win, I wanna run one of them
> drug sniffing dogs around there house....
    
    The Giants will win this game.  Take it to the bank.
    
    
    glenn
    
56.1620could happenHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 20 1994 13:2917
Well, the Saints were within another pass by Aikman or so of winning
lasted night.

In the lasted 4 games by the Cowboys, you have them looking good with
Jason Garrett against the Packers on Turkey Day, beating Philly despite
Peete who had a hard time throwing the ball past the line of scrimmage,
losing to Cleveburgh with Aikman stinking up the place and hanging on
again with Aikman the principal stinkee. 

Brilliant coaching there.

Irvin is hurt. In fack, the injury report for the Cowboys is longer than
any other 2 teams. 

In short, the Cowboys can be had.

TTom
56.1621MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 20 1994 13:3011
  >> If anyone really thinks the Giants are gonna win, I wanna run 
  >> one of them drug sniffing dogs around there house....

     I think the Giants have a good shot at winning this game. Emmitt 
     probably won't play at all. Troy will probably play limted duty.
     And Switzer won't exactly be pulling out all the stops. While Dallas
     is trying to escape without injuries, the Giants will be fighting
     for their lives. New Orleans gave the Cowboys all they could handle
     before Everett threw another INT, the Giants can beat them.
    
56.1622CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 20 1994 13:3610
I'm NOT jumping on any bandwagon, but I agree that the Giants can beat
the Dallas Saturday.  Half of Dallas' offensive weapons are out, and the
Giants are doing the "win ugly" thang.

Also, San Diego played better lasted week, but are still slumping.  I 
think they can be had by Pittsburgh.  Detriot(tm) is hot, and have a 
good shot at beating the flat Fish.  All that's left is for the Pats to
win...

=Bob=
56.1623should be a fun dayFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 20 1994 14:524
    It seems the Pats have more options this weekend than anyone.  They can
    go from missing the playoffs to a division winner with a 1st round bye.
    
    Mike
56.1624Dallas over reportsILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersTue Dec 20 1994 16:4015
>> In fack, the injury report for the Cowboys is longer than
>> any other 2 teams. 

	The Cowboys injury list is the longest in the league because
	they got in trouble with the league. They failed to report the
	Troy Aikman thumb (I think) injury before the big game against
	the 49ers. This caused the league to investigate (they wondered
	if the point spread changed late in the week when the word
	leaked out). The league fined Jerry Jones for this transgression.

	Since that incident the Cowboys have gone over board reporting
	injuries, every little cut, nick or boo boo is filed on the
	teams injury report. Jerry Jones is playing cute with the league.

	Vinny
56.1625not looking good fer the 'BoysHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 20 1994 16:4313
I unnerstand about the injury list thang but just looking at the top of
the offense you have injuries or continued recoveries to Aikman, Irvin,
Harper, Novacek and now Emmitt.

Any way you slice it, it don't look good for the defending champs. Not
with the way San Francisco is looking and not with these key players
injured and/or unable to play.

Right now, the Cowboys would be hard pressed to beat some of the other
contenders such as the Vikings, the Lions, and maybe even the Bears. They
haven't looked good in quie a while.

TTom
56.1626Grogan at the Helm, 12/86AKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberTue Dec 20 1994 17:0813
    Yep,  this game will be a lot like December '86 when the aging veteran
    Steve Grogan came in when Eason went down and rallied the Patriots to a
    stirring victory capped by a 3rd down pass to Stanley Morgan.  All this
    in the Orange Bowl to boot.
    
    This vaulted the Pat's past Miami to the Division championship and left
    Collingsworth and his Cinci colleagues crying in their beer.
    
    This inspiring performance capped a Hall of Fame caliber career for
    Steve although Raymond Berry never got it.  In the playoff vs Denver he
    went back to Eason until the game was lost.
    
    Billte
56.1627MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Dec 20 1994 17:068
>    It seems the Pats have more options this weekend than anyone.  They can
>    go from missing the playoffs to a division winner with a 1st round bye.
>    
>    Mike

     The same can be said for the top FOUR teams in the NFC Central.  Any one
     of them can win the division; any one of them (but no more than one) can
     miss the playoffs.
56.1628CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 20 1994 17:244
|    This inspiring performance capped a Hall of Fame caliber career for
|    Steve although Raymond Berry never got it.  In the playoff vs Denver he
 
Uhh Billte, I liked Grogan too, but...
56.1629Pats have a shot at a first round byeFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 20 1994 17:506
>     The same can be said for the top FOUR teams in the NFC Central.  Any one
>     of them can win the division; any one of them (but no more than one) can
>     miss the playoffs.
    
    Yeah but will the NFC Central winner get a bye in their best case
    scenario?  I didn't think they could.
56.1630Get real!!OLD1S::CADZILLA2IDRINKALONEWITHMYBUDDYJACKDANIELSTue Dec 20 1994 17:523
    
    There will be hockey matches in hell before Steve Grogan makes it into
    the NFL Football Hall of Fame
56.1631METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Dec 20 1994 18:034
SF and Dallas have the 2 byes in the NFC.

The Crazy Met
56.1632still ma manAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberTue Dec 20 1994 19:133
    Well I did say Hall of Fame caliber career.  Some of this is an opinion
    from viewing the performance.  Partly it is what ifs concerning Raymond
    Berry coming in as coach, 87 strike.
56.16331986 was one season where I had no problem with EasonEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 20 1994 20:0818
>    This inspiring performance capped a Hall of Fame caliber career for
>    Steve although Raymond Berry never got it.  In the playoff vs Denver he
>    went back to Eason until the game was lost.
    
    Well, I too disagree with the HOF caliber comment, and I was no great
    fan of Tony Eason, but in his defense 1986 was his best season as a
    pro and an excellent one.  Nor do I recall that it was Eason who was 
    primarily responsible for that loss in Denver, at least to the extent 
    that he was dealing with a ferocious pass rush throughout.  The instance 
    where Berry truly didn't "get it" came the next year when he insisted on 
    using Eason with the damaged wing in the season finale, also at Denver,
    where Eason really was pathetic but moreover didn't belong on the field
    in that physical condition.
    
    glenn
    
                                                             
56.1634CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendWed Dec 21 1994 11:458
>    
>    There will be hockey matches in hell before Steve Grogan makes it into
>    the NFL Football Hall of Fame
>

Well, Hell has our phone number, so if they needed systems to keep the stats
on......

56.1635ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Wed Dec 21 1994 11:516
56.1636HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 21 1994 12:435
  I've heard that they will be adding ladies figure skating in time for
Tonya's arrival.

  Whack!
  George
56.1637ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Wed Dec 21 1994 12:523
56.1638HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 21 1994 12:5912
  If the Patriots keep on winning, Bob Lobel and the other folks at Boston's
WBZ TV will be chewing and spitting nails.

  As of Jan 2, 1995, WBZ TV Channel 4 will be switching from NBC to CBS. The
local Channel 7 station will be switching from CBS to NBC.

  For WBZ and Bob Lobel this means losing football just when the Patriots are
scheduled to play in the conference semi-finals.

  Why does part of me want to chuckle?

  George
56.1639CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Dec 21 1994 13:064
|  Why does part of me want to chuckle?

Yea, without the Pats on his station, Lobel may actually need
to learn something about sports.
56.1640This guy is a complete baffoonAD::HEATHCan the Pats duplilcate it???Wed Dec 21 1994 13:3310
    
    
       Why bust on Lobel?  Yea he has his faults.  Big deal we all do.  You
    really want some ammo to rag on someone, listen to the Pats pre-game on
    BZ starting at 9:00 this Saturday with Boob Nuemier.  He is so obnoxious
    I have to watch Sesame St. with my daughters at .5 hour intervals to
    keep myself from wanting to kill something.
    
    
    Jerry
56.1641CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Dec 21 1994 13:447
I've never listend to 'BZ's pregame because I knew about Nuemier.

WEEI has a show with Dale Arnold, Steve Nelson, and two reporters
that I think is great.  It runs opposite the show on 'BZ, and I 
always choose it.

=Bob=
56.1642CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendWed Dec 21 1994 13:5010
Neumier used to be one of the voices of the old WHA New England Whalers.

Then he got a sports job on one of the local stations.  I believe it might
have been WVIT-TV30.   On the air, and as a reporter, he was always slightly
controversial.

I did meet him once or twice in person and he seemed a bit more personable
but always in a hurry.  

'Saw
56.1643They could both lose out...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 21 1994 14:218
    
    A Pats' wildcard game could end up with neither Ch 7 nor Ch 4, but 
    ironically on ABC with Ch 5.  I don't know how the process works but 
    what I've heard is that for the money they spend on their MNF contract,
    ABC gets some choice in the matter with the wildcard games...
    
    glenn
    
56.1644But then again I liked ShenkelAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Dec 21 1994 14:244
    At least if not the best we'd have a crew that I at least can stand. 
    ABC doesn't seem overproduced and over scripted like the others.
    
    I like Sommerall but unlike most don't overly care for Madden.
56.1645HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 21 1994 14:3315
  Yeah, it's too bad about Bob Nuemier.

  He seems to be an intelligent guy with a good knowledge of sports once you
get past all the exadurated verbal gestures.

  I've heard that he is well respected by the horse racing crowd at places
like Churchill Downs.

  But those basketball reports:

  "And the Celtics lost because of THIS PLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY when
     Dan-dy-DO-DO TOOK - THEM - TO - THE - HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP!!!!!!!!!"

  George
56.1646SALEM::DODAWorking on mysteries without any cluesWed Dec 21 1994 15:035
Who was that sports guy who was on one of the 3 Boston stations a 
few years ago with the wacky name? Biff or Spiff or something 
like that....

daryll
56.1647MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 21 1994 15:052
    
      Ziff Rzeppa. Believe it or not, he's huge on St. Louis now.
56.1648SALEM::DODAWorking on mysteries without any cluesWed Dec 21 1994 15:061
Yeah that's him, actually isn't it Zipp?
56.1649Hey..wise up!!!MSBCS::GALVINR.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625Wed Dec 21 1994 15:4610
>    Hell allows sports participation, but only in major sports -
>    football, basketball, baseball and soccer (the most popular
>    sport in the world).  Hockey, hop-scotch, ping pong, curling,
>>>  candle pin bowling, ring-around-the-rosie and other minor sports 
>    are not allowed.
    
    Hey groaner.  What did I ever do to you.  Keep candlepin bowling out of 
    your shots at ex-pats legends!!!
    
    RTG
56.1650Big money in them pins... NotAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Dec 21 1994 15:529
    One of my favorite quotes (and sorry if this is a repeat) happened at
    the local bowling alley where Billy Travers, who won 20+ for the
    Brewers in the 70s was bowling.  One of the local wags saw his form and
    said "Hey kid, you could make a lot of money if you get serious about
    this game".
    
    Travers about that time signed one of the big free agent contracts and
    like fellow Norwoodite Skip Lockwood never really earned it.  Travers
    did appear on the channel five bowling show a few times.
56.1652Neumeier's okay...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 21 1994 16:0511
    I've heard the Neumeier pre-game thing on WBZ a few times and 90% of 
    it is an act, behaving arrogantly and busting on Tim Fox.  The guy may
    have a bit of an ego but as a sports reporter I actually prefer him to 
    the Lobel/Lynch/Dennis ilk because he actually knows something about
    sports (including sports outside of the Boston area, shock of shocks!),
    instead of relying on telling bad jokes, showing bloopers, and offering
    generally ridiculous, mainstream cliched commentary.
    
    glenn
     
56.1653Fox was a tough playerMAYES::MAILLOUXWed Dec 21 1994 17:2716
    
    
    
    	I listen to BZ as well and enjoy the bantering between Nuime and
        Fox. I think Fox is excellent, and for obvious reasons knows what
        he's talking about. I love the story he told last year about how
        they had found ( ya right ) a hole in the lockeroom, that just 
        happened to be situated right next to the Chearleaders dressing
        room.... Anyway, the guy that said Nuemier is a knowledgeable horse
        man is correct, and it's no coincidence that he gets along so well
        with his tunaship, for Mr. Bill ownes a couple horses himself. I
        believe a read some place that next year Fox is going to do another
        sport show but without Nuemier.
    
    
    	RM
56.1654ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Wed Dec 21 1994 19:435
56.1655SALEM::DODAWorking on mysteries without any cluesWed Dec 21 1994 19:556
The list of moronic sportscasters is long. How about Bob Gamere? 
WMUR has Mark Ockerbloom (sp), what a buffoon.

What ever happened to Guy Manilla?

daryll
56.1656whatever happened to ol' whatsisnameAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Dec 21 1994 20:108
    Guy left bz for Philly and I just heard (I think, that billte is very
    apt in that regard) that he'd retired.  Someone in the sports talk
    fraternity is close to him.
    
    I didn't like him but after he left thought better of him. And he was a
    pioneer in the genre.
    
    Then again there was BowWow Fredericks.
56.1657TraversMSBCS::GALVINR.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625Thu Dec 22 1994 11:5915
    Bill,
    
    I bowled against Billy Travers in a channel 5 roll-off last summer.  He
    has such a smooth approach.  Funny though....looking at him, you
    wouldn't know he is a retired MLB player.  He is one damn good bowler
    though.
    
    BTW.....fun fact.....Billy Travers is the only person to have been on
    the channel 5 show as a winner, and not be able to defend his title.  I
    think it was in the 1981 strike year.  If memory serves me correctly,
    he had taped channel 5, won, and then the strike was lifted before his
    next taping.  So he retired undefeated.  Since that time he has been on
    and lost channel 5.
    
    RTG
56.1658Sports Reporters....USCTR1::BARRYTue Dec 27 1994 13:2621
    
    
    I'm pretty tired of Lobel's act. Particularly on the mornings when he
    insists on bringing on "Lisa Boombaca" (I know I spelled that wrong,
    but....) and the entire sports segment consists of extremely mindless
    banter between the two. That's not what I turn on the tube for....
    
    But the absolute worst sports segment in Boston is that guy on FOX. Don't
    know his name; don't want to.
    
    In light of the fact that there have been two major sports not playing
    over the past few months, these guys have been presented with the
    "opportunity" to display some creativity and go after new angles and
    new stories. Without exception, they've failed. Instead of expanding
    coverage of college or HS sports, or looking into amateur athletics
    (which abound in Boston: Rugby, Hockey, Running, AAU B-Ball), we get
    daily reports that nothing is happening on the strike/lockout scene.
    
    Let's face it, when the sports teams are all playing, these guys have
    it pretty easy. Now that they have to work for a story, they don't
    really know what to do.
56.1659Is his name Mike Adams? Rings a bell...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 27 1994 13:326
|  But the absolute worst sports segment in Boston is that guy on FOX. Don't
|  know his name; don't want to.
 
Agreed.  I don't watch often, but I've never seen this guy keep his 
comentary in time with the highlights he is showing.  He makes stupid
comments, and YELLS.
56.1660TENVAX::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindTue Dec 27 1994 15:2528
    Regarding the comments on Parcells and the adjustment of the "D":
    
    I believe that the Pats have not allowed a 2nd half touchdown in the
    past 5 games.
    
    This certainly indicates that the team has been able to consistently
    make whatever adjustments are necessary.  
    
    I give credit to Parcells for either making the changes, or for having
    the brains to hire Al Groh and allowing him to make the changes.
    
    I also give credit to Parcells for another aspect of this team that
    hasn't gotten much notice, and that is the fairly low incident of major
    injuries, something that wasn't always the case in the past 10-15
    years.  I don't know if it's due to the conditioning coach and his
    program, or Parcells' not having them beat each other up during
    practice, or a combo of both.  Perhaps it's only luck.  But, I doubt
    it.
    
    They are playing smarter football.  By that, I mean far fewer foolish
    mistakes that always seemed to come at the wrong time, and the turnover
    ratio between gives and takes.  This reminds me of the NFC game.
    
    I'm glad he's here, and I hope he stays for a long while.  I don't care
    of the writers love him or hate him.  I think the players respect him,
    and that's what matters.
    
    Lee
56.1661CSLALL::BRULEgo ahead with your own life leave me aloneTue Dec 27 1994 16:453
    Parcells Strength coach deserves a lot of credit to the low number of
    injuries. So doesn't the elimination of the artificial turf in Foxboro.
    
56.1662too much carpetHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 27 1994 16:4811
>    injuries. So doesn't the elimination of the artificial turf in Foxboro.

Amen, brother.

They oughta make that there carpet-turf illegal. Period.

On the issue of injuries, it shore does look like the 16 game schedule is
a bit too long for the size, strength and speed of today's players. I've
never seen so many people down and out at the end of the season.

TTom
56.1663CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldTue Dec 27 1994 18:126
 actaully Parcells does have them beat one another up to a certain extend.
 They do get monday and tuesday off but practice in pads all week unlike
 alot of other teams...........

 mike
56.1664SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Tue Dec 27 1994 18:4212
    
    	Parcells encourages EVERYONE to stay around during the offseason.
    So that they can workout under the supervisor of the Strength and
    Conditioning coach. If you do not you better be in GREAT shape come
    training camp. If not you will be in Parcells dog house and in some
    cases traded away.  Drew Bledsoe spent 1 month back home in Washington
    then returned to Boston last year. Then started watching film in
    February. 
    	The other thing about Parcells is that you better be able to run
    2 miles in x amount of time and do the 40 yrd dash in x amount of time.
    If not you don't even practice. If you are not in condition you
    don't practice, you run laps and lift weights.
56.1665MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 27 1994 18:4910
    
      Over the past few days, a Pats player or two has cited their superior
     conditioning as a reason for their late season surge and their ability
     to take over the game in the third and fourth quarters. These guys also
     have supreme confidence in Big Tuna's ability to prepare them for and
     guide them through the playoffs. And yes, they have not given up a second
     half touchdown in five games. That *is* a testimony to the defensive
     staff's ability to adjust to whatever new wrinkled the opposition has
     decided to toss at them. The Patsies are peaking at the right time and
     Hal and Groaner will be bummin' because of it.
56.1666DZIGN::ROBICHAUDOne More One...Tue Dec 27 1994 18:525
    	A trademark of the Big Horned Pout's teams is that they are
    physically and mentally tough.  Sometimes this is enough to overcome
    other deficiencies.
    
    				   /Don
56.1667MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Tue Dec 27 1994 19:095
    I would not be the least bit suprised to see the Beached Whale's team
    picked as a slight favorite over the Browns.
    
    
    billl
56.1668CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 27 1994 19:2711
56.1669Pats that goodOURGNG::RIGGENNetworks Sales &amp; MarketingTue Dec 27 1994 19:5311
Seems to me that the Patroits Offensive line just played great. Reminds 
me of watching BYU creating a wall for the QB DuJour to just stand back 
and wait for the open man. 

Question :
Does Bledsoe hold the ball at his waist cause he hasn't been taught to bring it 
up to the ear hole or is he just quick enough to rest it there to cause the 
defense confusion on the direction of the pass ?


Jeff 
56.1670MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Tue Dec 27 1994 20:0012
    If I understand the spreads correctly, a 3 point spread would
    basically mean these two teams are equal, but the 3 points are
    usually given to the away team.  If the Pats are just a 1 to 1 1/2
    point 'dog then I would interpret that to mean the oddsmakers 
    consider the Pats to be the better team (on a neutral field).
    
    You're right, though, Cleveland Municiple Stadium is anything but
    neutral.
    
    
    
    billl
56.1671PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Tue Dec 27 1994 23:2212
56.1672I was confusedCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Dec 28 1994 11:196
|    so the STEELER game was a cakewalk fer the 'Spots, right???  Twasn't a
|    hard game fer them , they just chose to lay down and  get their butts
|    beat.

Okay, okay, I forgot that the Steelers (err, I mean STEELERS) game was 
after the Cowboys game...
56.1673DZIGN::ROBICHAUDOne More One...Wed Dec 28 1994 11:594
    	Who would've thought that anything with that ugly Elvis logo
    would be such a hot item?  It's amazing what winning can do.
    
    				   /Don
56.1674Winners sell seatsODIXIE::ZOGRANTestudo is still grounded!Wed Dec 28 1994 12:0911
    Having a winning team does wonders for areas associated with the team -
    attendance, merchandise sales, community spirit, etc.  When the Braves
    were stinking up the joint you could practically sit in the dougout
    during the game.  Once they started winning, you could hardly scalp a
    ticket to a big game.  It's amazing that more owners don't (won't,
    can't?) see this.  Winners (not offense or defense specifically) puts
    people in seats.
    
    JMHO
                                                              
    UMDan
56.1675SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Wed Dec 28 1994 12:147
    
    	Speaking of merchandise, the Patriots have gone from #28 in the
    league to #10. In total revenue generated from merchandise sales. So
    the other owners must like the new logo. Since the merchandise money
    is split equally.
    
    Ron
56.1676Re Pats' merchandiseMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRWed Dec 28 1994 12:375
I actually saw a guy wearing a New England Patriots jacket on the
pedestrian mall between Karlsplatz and Marienplatz here in Munich
last week.

Steve
56.1677Good reading; occasionally random with da facks...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 28 1994 13:2614
    Anybody got the definitive scoop on the Patriots' home schedule for
    next year?  In Monday's Globe, they listed both Pittsburgh and San Fran
    under home opponents "if Miami won last night", then on Tuesday they
    reversed it and showed both games on the road.  Big difference.  I
    suspect that the latter is correct, but when it comes to the minutae 
    you never know with the Globe (like with the playoff tie-breaker
    situations; they had them screwed up all week long, including stuff
    like the Bears losing the tie-breaker to the Giants on "net points
    against common opponents" when it had been well-established for two
    weeks that all the NFC Central teams held those tie-breaker advantages).
    
    glenn
      
56.1678DZIGN::ROBICHAUDOne More One...Wed Dec 28 1994 13:425
    	I would love to see PittsburgH come to Foxboro next year.  Last
    time I saw the Steelers there was the 1979 Monday night overtime
    loss.  Didn't get home until 3:30 in the morning.
    
    				   /Don
56.1679Panthers is coming to townHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 28 1994 13:430
56.1680It's been a long time...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 28 1994 14:0313
    
>    I would love to see PittsburgH come to Foxboro next year.  Last
>    time I saw the Steelers there was the 1979 Monday night overtime
>    loss.  Didn't get home until 3:30 in the morning.
    
    Last time I saw them there, too, and the last time they've been to
    Foxboro.  I probably came away a bit happier, though. ;-)  As I recall
    the Steelers were unimpressive and the Pats handed them an opportunity
    in OT by choking in the final minutes of regulation, then ol' (young)
    Matt Bahr won it in sudden death...
    
    glenn
    
56.1681yabbut will they have a coach?TNPUBS::ALVEYPogue MahoneWed Dec 28 1994 14:041
    
56.1682not for lack of trying...MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Wed Dec 28 1994 14:249
    I've been waiting since I moved here to see the Steelers in
    Foxboro.  Coming of age in the early 70's made it impossible
    to see them at 3Rivers.  Hail, the only live Steeler game I've
    ever attended was vs. the Cowboys in Pitt Stadium.  I'm not
    sure of the year, but my dad tells me it was Dallas' first 
    year.
    
    
    billl
56.1683PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Dec 28 1994 17:5710
           <<< Note 56.1678 by DZIGN::ROBICHAUD "One More One..." >>>

>    	I would love to see PittsburgH come to Foxboro next year.  Last
>    time I saw the Steelers there was the 1979 Monday night overtime
>    loss.  Didn't get home until 3:30 in the morning.
    
    Slash, wuz that the 16-13 OT loss on Labor Day weekend?  I *vaguely*
    remember being there with a caravan from WPI my Senior year.
    
    Mark.
56.1684PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Wed Dec 28 1994 18:3719
    
    >>I've been waiting since I moved here to see the Steelers in
    >>Foxboro.  Coming of age in the early 70's made it impossible
    >>to see them at 3Rivers.  Hail, the only live Steeler game I've
    >>ever attended was vs. the Cowboys in Pitt Stadium.  I'm not
    >>sure of the year, but my dad tells me it was Dallas' first 
    >>year.
    
    Firsted game I was was aginst the Eagles in Pitt Stadium, STEELERS got
    their asses kicked that day.
    
    When I got out of the Air Farce, a good friend's dad worked for a
    company that had about 20 seats to Three Rivers, and we ended up with 2
    seats fer every game, including the playoffs.  Was sitting there
    drinking tequila and beers when they beat the Oilers 34-5 on their way
    to the Super Bowl, in all the ice and snow and freezing rain.
    
    JaKe
    
56.1685DZIGN::ROBICHAUDOne More One...Wed Dec 28 1994 19:2610
56.1686HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 13:0212
  Well the season is over the the Pats but they did fine. Few expected them to
make the playoffs and almost no one expected them to make it when they were
3-6. 

  Congradulations to the Browns but they didn't exactly run away with the game.
One lucky catch right at the end and the Pats would have been able to tie the
game. Matt Barr could have won it in overtime. 

  Next year the Conference Championships. The year after that, the Superbowl.

  GO PATS!!!
  George
56.1687At least my #2 team, the Packers will get one more week...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Jan 03 1995 13:139
The Pats need to get much bigger on both lines of scrimmage.
If they can't do this, I don't care if they get Barry
Sanders and his brother Deon, they will not be serious
Super Bowl contenders.

Congratulations to the Browns, they won the game on the 
line of scrimmage.

=Bob=
56.1688TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Tue Jan 03 1995 13:2427
    
    
    
    	I'm pretty happy with the New England Patriots. At the beginning of
    the year, I thought an 8-8 season would be a success. I never would
    have predicted a playoff berth for this team. An excellent season, a
    lot of fun to watch this team develop, The only time I was disappointed
    was the three game stetch losing to the Raiders, Jets, and Dolphins.
    Those were the only games they played without any spark.
    
    	Next year they should be a serious contender for the AFC East
    Division, and go a little deeper into the playoffs.
    
    	It'll be interesting to see what Parcells does with personell
    changes now. I think they need:
    
    	o - To improved the Offensive Line, especially the Run Blocking.
    
    	o - A speedy WR to give Bledsoe a true deep threat.
    
    	o - A pound it down-you-throat running back
    
    	o - a long term answer to the place-kicking game....
    
    
    JimH
    
56.1689SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Tue Jan 03 1995 13:5312
    
    	During last nights news they showed Parcells daily press
    conference for Monday. They asked Bill what needs to be done.
    He didn't give exact answers. Then there was talk about how
    the Patriots have 18 either FA's or RFA's. He said the coaching
    staff and myself will evaluate our team, evaluate our needs.
    Then decide who to resign and who not too. He said that
    decisions would be made quick. He wants to notify all the players
    who are not going to be offered contracts ASAP. So that they
    can sign on with another team.
    
    Ron
56.1690DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake!Tue Jan 03 1995 15:064
    	Letting go of Butts and Reynolds would free up some salary cap
    dough...
    
    				  /Don
56.1691Which WR would you like ??MASALA::DWALLACEDigirolaFri Jan 06 1995 17:515
    I was under the impression that Timpson was a good WR & Brisby a very
    good WR. And nobody gives a $hit about Crittendon anyway as he's in 
    very few series - as long as he can hang onto the ball then that's good
    enough.
    	   Davie.
56.1692CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Mon Jan 30 1995 13:0826
Okay, I don't understand something. (I know, nobody is 
surprised by that).

According to the newspaper, Kraft (owner of Pats) is 
bleating about losing $10 Million per year, and that he
needs state money to do this, that, and the other thang.

What I don't understand is this - how could this guy 
manage to lose that much given the following:

	o There is a hard salary cap in the NFL, so 
	  his payroll is no more than anyone else's.
	o His games are ALL sold out.
	o The Pats have gone from the bottom to near 
	  the top in merchendise sales.
	o He OWNS the stadium - no rent, no sharing 
	  luxury boxes, he gets the parking lot
	  concession, etc.
	o He has no front office infrastructure to 
	  speak of, particularly after he canned
	  Patrick Forte

I didn't read the whole article, but what's the story, is
this guy another Billy Sullivan when it comes to business?

=Bob=
56.1693HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 30 1995 13:2816
  It appears that he's trying to make a case to get the city and state to build
him a new stadium down town. 

  While he's probably being just a tad sleazy he does have a point. When the
former owners were threatening to take the Patriots to St Louis the Governor,
Mayor, and Mass Legislature were scrambling to make an 11th hour deal to build
a stadium to convince the owner or new owners to stay in the Boston area. 

  Then Kraft stepped in and bought the team pledging to keep them in town and
suddenly all the promises of a new stadium vanished. 

  The hard reality is that arm twisting is the only way a new stadium will ever
be built. As long as the politicians in town believe that Kraft is happy out in
Foxboro, no stadium will get built.

  George
56.1694Don't look at water's level, look at water's flowAKOCOA::BREENMon Jan 30 1995 13:357
    I believe the agreement with the banks that financed the purchase
    called for a lot of money (interest) to be paid early in the loan(s).
    
    He probably has a lot of depreciation costs in the bottom line.  The
    real bottom line will be in the money spent for free-agents.  
    
    Gee didn't Goodenau(sic) and Fehr say the same type of thing.
56.1695ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysMon Jan 30 1995 14:518
    
    He may own the stadium, but he probably has payments on it.  Most
    people don't usually plunk down a few hundred million cash when they
    makle that kind of purchase.  Except for the appreciation in a team's
    value, I don't think most owners go into the franchise business
    planning to get rich, though.
    
    brews
56.1696$ Kraft does not getMROA::WILKESTue Jan 31 1995 16:447
    I believe merchandise revenues from NFL Properties are shared equally,
    so an increase in sales of Patriot paraphenalia does not directly help
    Kraft. Jerry Jones wants to get this arrangement changed because in
    recent year about 1/3 of all NFL Merchandise has been Cowboys logos.
    
    Also, I am pretty sure Kraft does not own the parking lots at Foxboro.
    They belong to Eddie Andelman who owns the Foxboro Racetrack.
56.1697MoneyCSLALL::BRULEthe road of life is filled with idiotsTue Jan 31 1995 18:5410
    According to Andleman, Kraft leases the parking lots from Eddie.
    I'm wondering if Kraft is playing some kind of shell game. He maybe
    losing 10 mill per year on the Pats buy does this include money he pays
    to himself for a lease? Does Foxboro stadium make a profit? 
    I'd like to see the state give Kraft some kind of low interest loan so
    he can renovate the stadium allowing Kraft to add luxury boxes and 10
    thousand seats. Pay for it with lottery money so there is no taxpayer
    money involved. Too bad Foxboro wasn't a little closer to Boston.
    Putting a new baseball stadium right next to the football stadium would
    be great. 
56.1698DZIGN::ROBICHAUDSaveThePatriotsTue Jan 31 1995 19:0512
	Personally if the Macaroni and Cheese man is losing money, I feel,
too bad!  If he overpaid for the Patriots then the state has no obligation
to make good on a bad investment.  If Hartford or Providence wants to
guarantee profits for somebody who is very rich to begin with, fine.  I'll
still attend the games unless they try the "personal seat license" scam.  
What Kraft really wants is more luxury boxes, since that income is not 
split with the visiting teams like the other gate money is (course he 
doesn't want to pay for them).  Given the current zeal to clean up the 
welfare mess I see no benefit in cutting certain social benefits just to 
spend even more on someone who certainly doesn't need assistance!

				   /Don
56.1699CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Wed Feb 01 1995 12:4118
I'm still dumbfounded that this schmuck manages to lose
$10 MILLION.  I could see from the circumstances that he
could be in red ink, but $10 Mil?

So if he is losing $10 Mil, Jeff Laurie must be losing 
what $15 Mil? And the guy who bought the Bucs will lose
even more?

Yea, the state should subsidize their poor business 
judgement.

On the other hand, I have no problem with the state 
spending money to fix the roads in and around the 
stadium.  Traffic access tot he place sips big time, and 
even when there is no game, rt. 1 is historically a 
dangerous road.

=Bob=
56.1700PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Feb 01 1995 12:594
    Dan Shaughnessy basically told Kraft to perch 'n twirl in today's
    Globe.
    
    Mark.
56.1701MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Wed Feb 01 1995 13:047
>>perch 'n twirl

Is that a new gymnastic event?



billl
56.1702METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Feb 01 1995 13:127
>>perch 'n twirl

>Is that a new gymnastic event?

Depends on what kind of gymnsatics.

The Crazy Met
56.1703TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Wed Feb 01 1995 13:1313
    
    >Dan Shaughnessy basically told Kraft to perch 'n twirl in today's
    >Globe.
    
    	Somebody refresh my memory. What elective office does Danny-boy
    hold?
    
    	If there is somebody in Boston who seriously needs to perch 'n
    twirl, it's Danny-boy!!!
    
    JimH :-)
    
    
56.1704HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Feb 01 1995 13:2214
  I think I saw Dan Shaughnessy today. I was driving through Newton to get from
my house in Brighton to the Turnpike and a guy was jogging up the hill that
looked just like Dan. 

  Then again maybe it was a look alike. Could you imagine going through life
looking exactly like Dan Shaughnessy. 

  Anyway I agree that the Patriots should get their house in order but I'd
still like to see a major stadium with a retractable dome built down town. Then
I could go to Patriot games any time of the year without fighting the traffic
out to Foxboro. 

  George
56.1705CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 01 1995 13:419
I don't know what Dan Shaughnessy looks like....8^)

I recognize Bob Ryan now, because he's on ESPN on occasion on that show
with Dick Schaap, but I don't know what Shaughnessy looks like.

I hope for his sake he don't look like Eddie Andelman!  8^)


'Saw
56.1706Who knows what the honest-to-god real number is...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 01 1995 13:5810
    
    "Losing $10M" is a relative thing in sports-bookkeeping-speak.   You
    start with the premise that nobody makes any money, or very little.
    My name is Jerry Jones and I'm not in this for the money; I actually
    only made $13 after taxes last year.   Against that standard I don't 
    doubt that Kraft lost $10M.  And the average NFL situation is what the 
    poorer teams will compare against...
    
    glenn
    
56.1707ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Feb 01 1995 13:599
56.1708ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Feb 01 1995 14:043
56.1709DZIGN::ROBICHAUDSaveThePatriotsWed Feb 01 1995 14:2313
	Spending money on Route 1 would help the traffic flow somewhat, but 
you still have all those parking lots emptying out on to only one road.  An 
extra lane would be nice, but most of the accidents are caused by folks who
get snockered at the game.  Spending state money to build 100 or so extra 
luxury boxes is welfare for the rich.  I've been a season ticket holder for 
7 years now and a fan since the Boston Patriots/Fenway Park days, but if the 
only way the state can keep the team is through massive subsidies then I 
say so long it's been good to know you.  Do you really think Kraft would be 
making an issue of his losses had the Patriots gone 6-10 instead of 10-6?
He's taking advantage of the popularity of the team to try and line his 
pockets.

				   /Don
56.1710PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Feb 01 1995 16:128
    Which is basically Shaughnessy's position.
    
    Like the column read, "if Kraft moves the team or sells to an out of
    state investor, he'd be the modern-day Harry Frazee."
    
    Given the popularity of the team, he'd get skewered.
    
    Mark.
56.1711Ram envyMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Feb 03 1995 10:3912
.1709, Slasher:

> He's taking advantage of the popularity of the team to try and line his 
> pockets.

He's seen the city of St. Louis open the doors to the city treasury and
invite Georgia Frontiere to walk in with a bushel basket.

Hell, if St. Louis will hock the farm for a franchise as desperate as the
Rams, what can I get for a winner?

Steve
56.1712Been meaning to ask...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Tue Feb 07 1995 13:221
So like, why did the Pats fire Patrick Forte as VP?
56.1713DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFleet ForumThu Feb 23 1995 20:217
    	Let me get this straight.  Parcells thinks a backup defensive
    tackle is worth one million dollars but Kevin Turner doesn't rate
    a 750K qualifying offer (guaranteeing a first round draft pick should
    he be signed away).  I guess I just don't understand the workings
    of a genius mind.
    
    				   /Don
56.1714CNTROL::CHILDSLondon Calling &gt; Sandinista?Fri Feb 24 1995 13:575
 Maybe he's going to sign OJ Anderson.....seriously though FB's are a dime
 a dozen.............

 mike
56.1715Look at the whole picture.CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Mon Feb 27 1995 14:597
    Parcell's has never said that Turner wasn't worth 750 K. He just gave
    him a qualifying offer of 350k. He has the right to match any offer
    that Turner brings back. At that time Parcells will have to decide
    whether Turner is worth whatever he brings back, would rather have the
    3rd round pick or match the offer and trade him to another team. Why
    should he make a high qualifying offer? I look at it as good cap
    managment. Also Sam Gash is just about the same as Turner. 
56.1716DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFleet &lt;fill in the blank&gt;Mon Feb 27 1995 17:1915
	Let's say the Patriots don't get Meggett.  Since the compensation 
for Turner will only be a third round draft pick certain teams may find him 
attractive.  He's a good blocker and a very good pass catcher.  If Meggett 
is worth 2 million them maybe some GM may decide to pay Turner one million.
Do the Pats match the offer?  Could depend on whether or not they've got 
Thompson signed or not.  Maybe nobody goes after Turner if the compensation 
is a first round draft pick and the Pats get him for 750K.  While Gash is 
maybe a better runner and just as good a blocker I don't think he's close 
as a receiver out of the backfield.  And while Meggett will solve some 
problems (especially punt and/or kickoff returns) he still will not be able 
to carry the load as the feature back.  I still question spending one 
million dollars for a backup player on the worst team in football (unless 
he renegotiates a substantially lower price somewhere down the line).

				   /Don
56.1717CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Mon Feb 27 1995 17:2810
|as a receiver out of the backfield.  And while Meggett will solve some 
|problems (especially punt and/or kickoff returns) he still will not be able 
|to carry the load as the feature back.  I still question spending one 

I agree.  This is key.  I do feel, however, that in the world of mediocre to
good running backs, Leroy Thompson is as good as any of them.  Until someone
outstanding comes along, I think Thompson could be their featured back, while I
doubt very much that Meggett can.

=Bob=
56.1718MKFSA::LONGLet your tongue hang out. Stay cool.Mon Feb 27 1995 17:4813
    I really can't see a team placing their future in Meggett's hands
    (and legs) at this point in his career.  Thompson was a great pick
    for them last year. (I hated to see the Steelers loose him!)
    
    Maybe a speedster in the draft is their best best.
    
    re "worst team in the NFL":
    
    /er, I think you're being a 'little' tough on the Patsies.
    
    
    
    billl
56.1719Another guyILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersMon Feb 27 1995 18:007
>>    re "worst team in the NFL":
>>    /er, I think you're being a 'little' tough on the Patsies.
    
  	I think this was in reference to the Patriots offer to
	the defensive lineman from Houston ... $400k salary and
	$600k signing bonus to a backup with 20 career tackles ..

56.1720CNTROL::CHILDSGeorgetown &gt; SorryexcuseMon Feb 27 1995 18:005
 I think Slasher meant the Giants when he said worst team in the league
 but it was a fraudian slip he meant worst coach in the league........

 mike
56.1721MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Feb 27 1995 18:0414
    
       Parcells is taking a calculated risk that he'll get Turner
      for less than $750,000. If he doesn't get him, he'll get the
      fifth rounder instead which probably more than a pass catching
      fullback is worth to Bill. Gash seems to be more of Parcells'
      punishing type full back. Either way, I wouldn't be surprised
      to see Turner back next year.
    
      In other news - nice to see the Patsies set Tim Goad's mind
      at ease ( at least *reportedly) by letting him know that he's 
      their man at nose tackle. Goad's a solid player who has been 
      here through the very lean years and deserves to be here now 
      that things have turned for the better.
      
56.1722CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Mon Feb 27 1995 18:0914
    
 |     In other news - nice to see the Patsies set Tim Goad's mind
 |     at ease ( at least *reportedly) by letting him know that he's 
 |     their man at nose tackle. Goad's a solid player who has been 
 |     here through the very lean years and deserves to be here now 
 |     that things have turned for the better.
 
I like Goad, but to me he is one of the people Parcells refers to when he says
he needs to get more size on either side of the ball.  Goad will do fine as long
as the Pats stay with the 3-4 defense, but if they pick up a good d-lineman, I'd
like to see them switch to 4-3.  If they do this, Goad is just too small to play
tackle.

=bob=
56.1723DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFleet &lt;fill in the blank&gt;Mon Feb 27 1995 18:2413
	That's another thing about Parcells.  His fascination/obsession 
with size borders on latent...  Well I had better shut up lest we start 
another "vertically challenged" type of controversy here in ::SPROTS.  
Suffuice to say that Stepnoski is the best center in the NFL whether or not 
he tips the scale at the desired (for Parcells anyway), 300 pound minimum.  
We all saw how bulk and size (Marion Butts) helped the running game last 
year.

				   /Don
    
    	P.S.  Yes Mike the Giants may have been the worst team last
              year in terms of talent, but the coaching of DAN REEVES
              led to an astonishing 8-8 season.
56.1724CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Mon Feb 27 1995 18:317
Yabut, as much as it pains me, it one of those "beat 'em or join 'em" thangs
with the NFL.  All the teams are putting these immobile 300 pounders on the
line, so there is no denying that a 260-280 pound defensive tackle will have his
hands full when the guy throws a straight ahead block on him.  Quickness will
only get you so far.

=bob=
56.1725USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 27 1995 18:398
>       Parcells is taking a calculated risk that he'll get Turner
>      for less than $750,000. If he doesn't get him, he'll get the
>      fifth rounder instead which probably more than a pass catching
>      fullback is worth to Bill.

Given 3rd-rounders only have a 50% shot at making an NFL team, that's
like saying Turner isn't worth anything.  If that's true, why even
offer $750K ?
56.1726MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Feb 27 1995 18:505
    
  >> If that's true, why even offer $750K ?
    
     He's not offering him $750,000. That's the crux of the whole
     discussion.    
56.1727Who knows, but so far you can't argue too much with resultsEDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityMon Feb 27 1995 18:5818
    At anything over $1M/year (much less $2M) I think that Meggett is a
    mistake.  That one has "love affair with aging Giant" written all over 
    it.  This could be Parcells' one weak spot as it did appear that he 
    spent too much on a few of these types last year, which might have 
    limited his flexibility for this season.
    
    I too thought that Kevin Turner was a Parcells-type guy all the way,
    and supposedly one of the brighter young talents who'd be around here 
    a while.  Hopefully he still will be.  I don't think that Parcells is 
    that enamored of youth, though.  Although not to the same extreme he 
    seems to be just as content to do the George Allen veteran plug-in 
    thing than work with younger projects.  I still think that he's one 
    of the greatest game coaches that ever lived but no front-office
    genius.
    
    glenn
    
56.1728MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Feb 27 1995 19:0211
    
  >> as the Pats stay with the 3-4 defense, but if they pick up a good 
  >> d-lineman, I'd like to see them switch to 4-3.  If they do this, Goad 
  >> is just too small to play tackle.
    
     I don't see the Pats switching to a 4-3 any time soon. Linebacker is
     their deepest position with Brown, Slade, Sabb, McGinest, Moore, Collins
     and even Bavarro. Of course, some of those guys could be trade bait if 
     the Pats did switch but Parcells had the 3-4 when he had the Giants'
     great defensive teams so I don't see that happening.
    
56.1729USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 27 1995 19:346
>    I still think that he's one 
>    of the greatest game coaches that ever lived but no front-office
>    genius.

He didn't want Rodney Hampton.  Young had to pick him over Parcells
objections.
56.17304-3 possibilityCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Tue Feb 28 1995 12:169
    RE.1729
    Tommie,
    I thought I had read one of the D-linemen (A. Jones?) say that the
    Pats might be playing more 4-3 this year. The player said that right
    now in the 3-4 he was a part time player and expected to be paid as
    such but if they do play a 4-3 this year he wants more bucks because he
    would play more. It was in last weeks Globe.
    
    Mike
56.1731MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Feb 28 1995 14:5912
    
  >> I thought I had read one of the D-linemen (A. Jones?) say that the
  >> Pats might be playing more 4-3 this year. The player said that right
  >> now in the 3-4 he was a part time player and expected to be paid as
  >> such but if they do play a 4-3 this year he wants more bucks because he
  >> would play more. It was in last weeks Globe.
    
     I remember reading that. I thought it was purely speculative and that
     Jones (not sure either) was basically saying that he was satisfied with
     his salary and not worried about any new arrivals. Right now, the
     Pats just don't have the personnel to play the 4-3. Not sure if they
     have the desire to either.
56.1732Turner's agent earned his moneyTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Tue Feb 28 1995 15:516
    Turner got an offer of $1.375 million from the Eagles?  WOW!!!  Good
    luck to him!  He's a nice player, bet certainly not worth that kind of
    money.  Gash is a slightly better blocker, and third down backs out of
    the backfield are a dime a dozen.
    
    NAZZ
56.1733What's the nfl cap these days?AKOCOA::BREENYou took me by surprise, I'm afraidTue Feb 28 1995 16:421
    
56.1734OUTSRC::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Feb 28 1995 17:017
56.1735Or, just maybe he's a damn good football playerNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 28 1995 17:3724
                   
>    Turner got an offer of $1.375 million from the Eagles?  WOW!!!  Good
>    luck to him!  He's a nice player, bet certainly not worth that kind of
>    money.  Gash is a slightly better blocker, and third down backs out of
>    the backfield are a dime a dozen.
    
    While Turner is not worth that amount to the Patriots, at the same time
    you could also say that this offer does reflect to some degree his 
    true value, as that of a very good football player.  Which then begs the 
    question of why almost no effort was given to resigning one of the few 
    talented _young_ players on the team before it came to this point.
    
    I disagree that pass-catching fullbacks like Turner are a dime a dozen.
    I don't think there are that many of them, and there's no indication
    that Gash has that type of ability, to serve either as a blocker or a
    pass-catcher on non-obvious passing downs (situations that the Pats do
    often pass from).  Combined with the possibility of Thompson leaving and 
    Butts' status as an over-the-hill stiff, the Pats might be turning over 
    just about the entire backfield.  Given the rushing production that's 
    not so bad but I would have figured that Turner would be the one guy 
    they'd want to keep...
    
    glenn
    
56.1736CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Tue Feb 28 1995 18:074
|    Butts' status as an over-the-hill stiff, the Pats might be turning over 
|    just about the entire backfield.  Given the rushing production that's 

Hopefully losing Turner will prompt them to sign Thompson.
56.1737Big bucks for a part time backCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Tue Feb 28 1995 18:156
    Turner's offer of 1.375 mill+ a 1.25 mill signing bonus works out to a
    cap salary of about 1.9 mill per year. Gash is earning a lot less then
    that which is probably why the Pats won't match it. I think the Pats
    could use that money in other areas.
    
    Mike 
56.1738/Don had it pegged way back; what was the thinking here?NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 28 1995 18:2813
    
>    Turner's offer of 1.375 mill+ a 1.25 mill signing bonus works out to a
>    cap salary of about 1.9 mill per year. Gash is earning a lot less then
>    that which is probably why the Pats won't match it. I think the Pats
>    could use that money in other areas.
    
    But the question was whether he was worth less than half that, $750K
    for just one season, no?  Wasn't that the price where the prohibitive 
    draft pick compensation kicked in?  Obviously the Eagles are saying
    that any decision at $750K would be a no-brainer, for them...
    
    glenn
    
56.1739MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Feb 28 1995 19:4817
    
     Losing Turner is a minor setback not a colossal blunder.
    Philly and Washington aren't known lately for their stellar 
    personnel moves either but I seriously doubt that either of 
    them would have given up a first rounder *and* 1+ million a 
    year for Turner. Kevin, like Marv Cook, is a very good player 
    who just isn't a Parcells-type guys. Bill is smashmouth. Kevin
    may be the least smashmouth fullback in the league. Also 
    Kevin made his pass catching rep on the most pass happy 
    team in the league. Whether he'll be as effective or as 
    busy on a Philly or a Washington remains to be seen. $750,000
    for a third down back? Not Big Tuna. By the same token, if 
    Big Tuna gives Dave Meggett the two mil that he's looking for, 
    Bill deserves to be locked up. It's the Butts mistake times 
    two. 
    
    
56.1740CNTROL::CHILDSGeorgetown &gt; SorryexcuseWed Mar 01 1995 12:169
 well it's Butts times two in some people's opinion cause my paper said
 the Pats offered Meggett more than Giants who put forth a 1.8 million
 a year package earlier this week.

 Given Meggett's gamebreaking ability on kickoff and punt returns, pass
 catching and running ability I doubt it's Butts times two........

 mike
56.1741For the talent level, don't think they're getting money's worthEDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityWed Mar 01 1995 13:0019
> well it's Butts times two in some people's opinion cause my paper said
> the Pats offered Meggett more than Giants who put forth a 1.8 million
> a year package earlier this week.
    
    Is it the 4-year deal, too?  That'd be the biggest concern; Meggett
    is 29 this year.
    
    I don't think that the $750K to keep Turner is at all outrageous when
    you consider that it is the average NFL salary (a manageable figure
    under the cap), and that guys like Ricky Reynolds and Myron Guyton are 
    pulling down $1.5M/per.  I asked the question earlier this year of 
    where all this young longterm talent is on the Pats, and Turner's was 
    one of only 7-8 names to come up.  Besides Bledsoe's obviously large
    salary, exactly where is all the money going that the Pats have so
    little maneuverability under the salary cap?
    
    glenn
    
56.1742MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 01 1995 13:2518
  >> I don't think that the $750K to keep Turner is at all outrageous when
  >> you consider that it is the average NFL salary (a manageable figure
  >> under the cap), 

     It is not outrageous but when you've already admitted that he's not 
     the answer to your running woes, that he's a third down back who
     does what Meggett does but probably not as well and you've got 
     a dozen+ other free agents to deal with and other needs to fill, 
     Kevin is a goner. 

  >> and that guys like Ricky Reynolds and Myron Guyton are pulling down 
  >> $1.5M/per.  

     Cover men are alot harder to come by than backs and alot more valued
     by Parcells.
    
    
56.1743AKOCOA::BREENJumblay,Crawfish pie, filet gumboWed Mar 01 1995 13:356
    I've heard the comparison between Meggett and Turner several times and
    I'm at a loss.  Turner is a big fullback, a fully competent blocker and
    inside rush man with the added ability to catch the ball.
    
    Meggett is a speed guy, open field and again pass catching ability.  I
    would have him and Turner in the backfield at the same time.
56.1744SNAX::ERICKSONBustings over, changed again..Wed Mar 01 1995 14:3014
    
    	I think people are over estimating Kevin Turners talent and worth
    to the Patriots. On a team that averaged 2.9 YPC, how can you say
    ANYBODY is a good blocker? Last time I looked Turner wasn't exactly
    Speedy Gonzalez. Sure he is a good receiver, who does VERY LITTLE after
    the catch. I vision a third down receiver being someone like a Ricky
    Watters of SF. He makes the catch and then can run with the ball
    afterwards. Where Kevin Turnver catches the ball and just trys to run
    over people. Sure you'll get 10 yrds here and there, he'll never break
    a long one for a TD though. You need players on your team that every
    time they touch the ball. They have a chance to score a TD. I don't
    see Turner as that type of player.
    
    Ron
56.1745DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFleet &lt;fill in the blank&gt;Wed Mar 01 1995 15:079
56.1746MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 01 1995 15:1312
    
    >> Turner is a big fullback, a fully competent blocker and inside 
    >> rush man with the added ability to catch the ball.
    
       If Turner was all that, he'd be the one getting the 2+ mil not
       Meggett. I'll give you everything but the inside rushing part.
       I think he's better aftee he catches the ball than Scott does, 
       but he's not a punishing runner by any stretch of the imagination.
     
       BTW - it certainly didn't hurt Turner that he had Coates to take
             alot of the heat off. Let's see what happens when *he's*
             the man.
56.1747CAMONE::WAYUSS Perch, SS 176, In MemoriamWed Mar 01 1995 15:167
I'm gettin' old and my memory ain't what it used to be....


Coates was going after some sort of receptions record -- did he get it?


'saw
56.1748Okay, where _is_ the talent coming from then?EDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityWed Mar 01 1995 16:0521
    While the loss of Turner may not be a big deal, I still believe that it
    may be syptomatic of a potential problem.  Turner was after all a
    recent high-round draft pick (and a player at least one team thought
    very highly of).  The Patriots don't have a whole lot of recent
    high-round draft picks doing much for them (now add Turner to the list 
    with Rod Smith, the second player taken in the expansion draft and one
    of the few young, low-salaried guys of any ability available).  Even in 
    this era of free agency, I'm not convinced that the way to get ahead is 
    to turn over a good part of your team every other year with veteran 
    free agents (which was the point with Reynolds and Guyton-- who combined 
    enjoyed a fair amount of pine time for their $3M/year-- their salary and 
    status, not their positions; meanwhile a decent contributor in Harlon 
    Barnett had to walk apparently because the money for that part of the 
    team had already been spent).
    
    Until there's a real talent infusion this team could very easily level
    off, or even backslide, quickly...
    
    glenn
    
56.1749Perhaps sessions watching old Packer films would helpAKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustWed Mar 01 1995 16:547
    Say what you want about Butts, he did do it elsewhere and noone, Turner
    included (right T) ever ran the ball for the Pats last year.
    
    I say that the pass needs to come off the run to be successful.  If the
    run is the "exception" then it is too easily tipped off.  Bledsoe has
    to practice this phase of his game, the deception part; for him a
    running play is like bunting was for Boggs.
56.1750MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 01 1995 18:4313
   >> Even in this era of free agency, I'm not convinced that the way to 
   >> get ahead is  to turn over a good part of your team every other year 
   >> with veteran free agents 

       Tell it to the SB champion Niners. This is life with the cap and
       free agency. You spend all of your money on you frontline/star
       players and pay everyone else as little as possible. In Turner's 
       case that meant less than $750,000, probably *much* less. Guys like 
       Turner have to be considered impact players or they don't get paid.
       With Bledsoe, Coates, Meggett (?), Timpson and whoever we come out
       of the draft with, Turner is no impact player especially not on a
       Parcells team.
    
56.1751So why are these mediocre imports making so much dough?EDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityWed Mar 01 1995 19:2718
>       Tell it to the SB champion Niners. This is life with the cap and
>       free agency. You spend all of your money on you frontline/star
>       players and pay everyone else as little as possible.
    
    Like I said, let me know when the Pats start bringing in some
    frontline/star players like the 49ers did (with a much better talent
    base to begin with) for their $33M's worth.  I'm not talking about 
    more players like Kratch, Guyton, Reynolds, Butts, Aaron Jones, Mike
    Pitts, this guy from the Oilers Tim Roberts or even Meggett for that 
    matter.  The NFL _makes_ you spend the $30M whether you get quality 
    or not; there's no rule that you have to spend it on someone else's 
    unwanted mediocre veterans instead of your own players, though.  This
    is the context from which I'm evaluating the loss of Turner: what are 
    the Pats bringing in return?
    
    glenn
    
56.1752MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 01 1995 19:5619
  >> there's no rule that you have to spend it on someone else's 
  >> unwanted mediocre veterans instead of your own players, though.  

     Parcells took the unwanted mediocre veterans that you listed
     and turned the Pats into a playoff team in the space of two 
     years and as Pats fan I was delighted. Bill said when he took
     over that he knew what had to be done and who he'd need to
     get it done with. Obviously, Turner is probably not one of the
     folks that he feels he needs to get it done. If Bill uses the
     dough that he didn't spend on Turner and Butts and uses it to 
     sign Dellenbach and Meggett, I feel pretty secure that we'll
     be able to take the next step towards the SB.

  >> This is the context from which I'm evaluating the loss of Turner: 
  >> what are the Pats bringing in return?
    
     I think the context that you need to be looking at in is the afore-  
     mentioned show of progress and not the loss of a single somewhat 
     talented player.
56.1753CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Wed Mar 01 1995 20:005
Butts future is not clear yet.  I think the Pats will wait to see
if they can sign Thompson, Meggett, and/or somebody else before
they decide if they want to bring him back.

=bob=
56.1754This is not a young team at key positions, by any stretchEDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityWed Mar 01 1995 20:1920
                       
>     Parcells took the unwanted mediocre veterans that you listed
>     and turned the Pats into a playoff team in the space of two 
>     years and as Pats fan I was delighted.
    
    I have complete confidence in Parcells' ability to get the absolute
    most out of what he's got to work with.  Unfortunately there'll be
    a limit to how far a team like that can go.  I just can't share your 
    optimism that the addition of a Dellenbach and Meggett gets the Pats 
    anywhere near a Super Bowl championship, now or in the future.  Some 
    of these guys are only getting older by the minute, which is the part 
    that makes the decisions most confusing.  Butts, Reynolds, Meggett,
    Guyton, Pitts, Jones, Kratch, DeOssie, Dellenbach (not to mention
    holdovers Armstrong, Goad, Vincent Brown): they are all over 30 or
    pushing it, and just about have to win right now, this upcoming season,
    to have any chance at it at all.  There can be a definite downside to
    the kind of improvement built on older veterans:  a sudden relapse.
    
    glenn
    
56.1755WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Mar 02 1995 00:2432
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                   
    >  Parcells took the unwanted mediocre veterans that you listed
    >   and turned the Pats into a playoff team in the space of two 
    >   years and as Pats fan I was delighted. Bill said when he took

    It's not always what you did, but what you could/should have done.

    Look, I mean, really look at the 5-11 record of '93-'94 vs. the
    10-6 '94-'95 record.
    
    5 games better, 5 games that without Scott "Missin'" Sisson, we would
    have won (and if you ask, I'll give you the game-by-game gory details)
    in the previous year.
    
    In my opinion, the Pats only improved this last year because of Matt
    Bahr.  Everything else pretty much stayed the same. 
    
    I agree that the Pats' coaching has left MUCH to be desired.  And
    Parcells has given the team the conditioning and discipline it sadly
    needed.
    
    But Why is Bill doing the personnel?  He's just not getting it --
    Sisson, Butts, a few others.  He's a great coach, but a lousy scout.
    And we're losing the Free Agent war once again.  Plus - losing Chung and
    Turner is indefensible.
    
    I hate to sound unappreciative for Bill.  But I don't think he's great
    at every job.  Let someone else pick the people, and then let him
    coach - that's what worked in NY.
    
    - Sean
56.1756Giants of the NorthWILLEE::MAILLOUXThu Mar 02 1995 15:038
    
    
    
    	Just heard on EEI, that the Pats have signed Meggett and will 
        make the announcement tomorrow. No details!
    
        RM
    
56.1757the sky ain't fallingMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 02 1995 15:1026
     >> -< This is not a young team at key positions, by any stretch >-

        You've got the best young QB in the league in coming into his third
        year. The best young tight end in the league will be in his fourth. 
        You're team leader in sacks will be in his fourth. McGinest should 
        be improved in his second year. The receiving corps is young although
        I wish they would have kept Hawkins. Tim Roberts is a young behomoth.
        That most of the rest of the team is reaching the twilight of their 
        careers speaks more to the drafting acumen previous regime than any 
        love that Parcells has of veterans. He just didn't have that many 
        folks worth keeping when he took over not a bagful of draft picks a 
        la Jimmy Johnson at Dallas. Year by year, Parcells has upgraded when 
        and where he could, that's good enough for me. *I* too was skeptical
        about a lot of his personnel moves and still am but this latest
        round makes sense to me.

     >> I just can't share your optimism that the addition of a Dellenbach 
     >> and Meggett gets the Pats anywhere near a Super Bowl championship,
     >> now or in the future. 

        The first step was to *get* to the playoffs. The next step is to 
        progress in the playoffs. Dellenbach and Meggett fill two dire needs
        and should energize the Pats anemic running game. I think we're
        ready to take that next step.
    
56.1758Lotta dough for a near-30-year-old specialist...EDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityThu Mar 02 1995 15:2619
>        The first step was to *get* to the playoffs. The next step is to 
>        progress in the playoffs. Dellenbach and Meggett fill two dire needs
>        and should energize the Pats anemic running game. I think we're
>        ready to take that next step.
    
    I thought you said that Parcells should be locked up if he gives
    Meggett his $2M?  It's actually much worse than that; the numbers are
    reportedly $10M for four years, about $4M up front and guaranteed if
    Meggett plays just this year, again for a 29-year-old special-teams
    and 3rd-down specialist (who does very little for the actual running
    game).  This sounds like blessing by coronation; whomever Parcells 
    wants must be worth it.   Sure, he could turn out to be right, but 
    given the personnel record so far I don't think it's any sure thing, 
    under the salary cap contraints.  Meggett is a very good player but
    _not_ (or no longer, if you insist) a frontline star in my estimation. 
    
    glenn
    
56.1759PTOSS1::JACOBRLernin' me agin!Thu Mar 02 1995 15:5112
    
    >>    You've got the best young QB in the league in coming into his third
    >>    year. The best young tight end in the league will be in his fourth. 
    
    And when that QB comes back down to earth this year, the Pats will be
    once again a .500 team.
    
    Sure, potentially he'll be a great one, but unachieved potential shows
    up a lot in the NFL.
    
    JaKe
    
56.1760MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 02 1995 19:3215
  >> I thought you said that Parcells should be locked up if he gives
  >> Meggett his $2M?  

     I think it's way too much. For that kind of dough, Meggett 
     will be doing more than catching the ball out of the back-
     field on third down and returning kicks. He'll probably be 
     platooning with Russell or whoever the other back(s) are.
     It's too a hefty price but that doesn't negate the fact that
     Meggett will be a pretty big plus as will Dellenbach. In
     getting hung up on this youth kick, you're forgetting that
     Bill is no kid himself and has a bad ticker. This isn't
     going to be his life's work. If I had to guess, I'd think
     that we're on the third year of a 4-5 year plan.
    
    
56.1761CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Thu Mar 02 1995 19:478
Kick returning was a weakness, and Thompson was adequate on 3rd
downs, but signing Meggett does not address the issue of the team
lacking a go-to running back.  Personally, I think Thompson could
fill that role, but I suspect that with the money spent on Meggett,
that they will be unable to compensate Thompson to the level he
expects.

=bob=
56.1762CNTROL::CHILDSMelrose Place &gt; FriendsThu Mar 02 1995 20:427
 Meggett had some games last year where he started and averaged 80 + yards
 on the ground for those games. It's his durability as a feature back that
 is the question mark plus his value on returns made the Giants not want to
 feature him that much. Besides Rodney is a horse when he's healthy........

 mike
56.1763CAMONE::WAYUSS Perch, SS 176, In MemoriamFri Mar 03 1995 12:4617
Bottom line, George Young blew this deal.

What we're seeing with George Young is basically someone who turned the
Giants around, brought two championships to the house, but has not been
able to adapt to the new times with the salary cap and free agency.

It's time the now skinny (but death warmed over) George Young step aside.


What the Patriots have is someone who can and probably will be one of the
emotional leaders of the team.  Can he be the feature back?  I'm not sure.
Can he do lots of things, all of them fairly well?  Most probably.

Just wait till you guys play the Redskins.  Meggett is a Redskin killer!


'Saw
56.1765At what price should Young not have "blown" this?EDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityFri Mar 03 1995 13:0622
    
> Bottom line, George Young blew this deal.
    
    I don't think so.  The Pats gave Meggett $10M, with $3M guaranteed in
    bonuses, so Meggett collects half the contract value if he plays just 
    one year.  I sincerely question the wisdom of that kind of deal.  Fact
    is, George Young almost matched it, but you can only go so far.  I 
    think the Giants will be better off in the long run.  In their
    particular situation already having a very good back in Rodney Hampton,
    they effectively let a great veteran punt returner and 3rd-down
    specialist get away, at the cost of $10M.
    
    Let's not forget, either, that like Hampton, coming out of the draft,
    Meggett was a player that Young liked, and Parcells didn't (the quote
    I heard repeated yesterday was "what am I going to do with a 5'7"
    RB?").  I think you're going to any lengths to criticize the
    Young/Reeves regime, 'Saw.  The Giants really are in a rebuilding
    period and spending $10M on a 29-year-old Dave Meggett just doesn't fit
    with that.
    
    glenn
     
56.1766CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Fri Mar 03 1995 13:196
    Saw,
    I only saw the Giants play twice last year. Will Megget give the Pats
    the same as Metcalf gives the Browns? As far as I'm concerned that
    would be enough for me
    
    Mike
56.1767CAMONE::WAYUSS Perch, SS 176, In MemoriamFri Mar 03 1995 14:2345
I'm not going to great lengths to criticize Young.

George Young is a dinosaur who is incapable of dealing with free agency
and the cap.  Even the Giants hired him an assistant to do that stuff because
George can't get it done any more....

George Young caused mega-problems in the first year of the FA thing, 
especially with the offensive line, by letting things go.  He could have
re-signed some players before they became free agents, but he let it go.

As such, the offensive line suffered, and lost a lot of depth.



Megget:

As to my ringing endorsement, I was only trying to point out that he's
a jack of all trades.  He's a solid player, who will bring leadership
and multi capabilities to the team.

Is he an Emmitt Smith/Walter Payton/Barry Sanders?  No.  Like Mikey
Childs, I don't know about his durability, but he filled in fine last
season while Rodney was down.

He plays extremely well against the Redskins -- he's thrown like three
TD passes against them the last two seasons.  That's always fun to watch.


I'm not really sure what Metcalf brings to the Browns, since I didn't
watch the Browns that much.   Meggett will bring 3rd down capability, sure,
but he's also good on returns, has good hands and decent speed.



As to George Young getting the Giants a game away from the playoffs, please,
don't patronize me.   If George Young had done as well at general managing 
the Giants as he did at losing all that weight, they'd have made the playoffs.

Instead, he's made a miserable mess of dealing with his free agents.

One can only hope that the guy either kicks the bucket (and man, he looks
like he's two breaths away) or retires soon....


'Saw
56.1768Whither Kevin Lee?EDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityFri Mar 03 1995 14:4012
 
    One other comment on the Meggett signing: where does that leave
    high-2nd round pick of a year ago, Kevin Lee?  I honestly don't know
    what Lee's prospects are or ever were before he got hurt last year, 
    but in function he seemed to be almost dead-on for Meggett's current
    role.  There will still be some use for him if he's any good, certainly,
    but likely not the value commiserate with yet another high draft
    pick. 
    
    glenn
    
        
56.1769CNTROL::CHILDSMelrose Place &gt; FriendsFri Mar 03 1995 15:002
 I thought Lee was a WR?
56.1771MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Mar 03 1995 15:0513
    
  > One other comment on the Meggett signing: where does that leave
  > high-2nd round pick of a year ago, Kevin Lee?  I honestly don't know
  > what Lee's prospects are or ever were before he got hurt last year, 
  > but in function he seemed to be almost dead-on for Meggett's current
  > role.  
    
    Lee is a speedy wide receiver. Meggett is a RB/Kick returner. That
    doesn't seem dead on to me. Lee might return kick offs, there's
    room for two of them back there but how this leaves Lee out in the
    cold requires a bit of a reach.    
        
    
56.1772CNTROL::CHILDSMelrose Place &gt; FriendsFri Mar 03 1995 15:067
>>      Don't know why you're so obsessed with Young's weight. It's
>>      irrelevant. And the seven game tailspin wasn't George's fault.

 agreed. So who's fault was it??????

 ;^)
56.1773Pats receiving corps may change someTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Fri Mar 03 1995 16:0911
    I will bet the Pats do not re-sign Timpson.  Some team will throw a
    million $+ contract at him, and Parcells will wave goodbye.  That would
    free up some money to sign a guy like Ricky Proehl (although he might
    be harder to get away from Phoenix now that Miami signed Randall
    (Thrill) Hill away from them).  If the Pats do get Proehl, he would
    team with Brisby, Lee, and Crittendon to be an above average wide
    receiver group that will be made to look better than they are by having
    Meggett come out of the backfield and Coates as a major weapon at tight
    end.
    
    NAZZ
56.1774Jug Ears Young....CAMONE::WAYUSS Perch, SS 176, In MemoriamFri Mar 03 1995 16:1749
>
>   >> I'm not going to great lengths to criticize Young.
>
>      You're way over here in the Pats note doing it.

My point exactly. This note came up before the Giants note did so
I figured I'd same myself some distance....8^)

Seriously, I think it is appropriate to discuss here.


>      Didn't say that. Merely pointed out that for all the grousing
>      about Young's personnel moves, the Ginats were just one game
>      away from the playoffs.

It's the moves he doesn't make when he needs to that are thep problem.

Again, if he had done his job well, the Giant might have made the
playoffs (in spite of Dan Reeves)....

If he had done, or was doing his job well, the wouldn't have brought in
an assistant to deal with cap issues.....


>      Don't know why you're so obsessed with Young's weight. It's
>      irrelevant. And the seven game tailspin wasn't George's fault.

I'm not obsessed with his weight.  I can just think up more wiseass
remarks to make about his weight than I can about thos funky glasses
he wears or his big ears...  I mean, we're talking big ol' jug ears.
I mean, we're talking jug ears that put Lyndon Johnson's jug ears to
shame!



>   >> One can only hope that the guy either kicks the bucket 
>
>      I know you don't mean this. At least, I hope you don't.

No I don't.  I wouldn't wish that on anyone.  Well, hardly anyone.

But seriously, the guy is becoming a dinosaur is is proving on a daily
basis that he's not capable of working WELL within this system that
exists now in the NFL....


'Saw
    

56.1775EDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityFri Mar 03 1995 16:4527
                                                            
>    Lee is a speedy wide receiver. Meggett is a RB/Kick returner. That
>    doesn't seem dead on to me. Lee might return kick offs, there's
>    room for two of them back there but how this leaves Lee out in the
>    cold requires a bit of a reach.    
    
    Lee may be listed as a WR but I thought he was pegged as a 3rd-down
    flanker type like Meggett.  When you rush the ball as little 
    as Meggett has, they can call you a RB but you're very close to 
    the same thing.  The only way I see Lee fitting now is if he indeed 
    can become a more conventional starting WR.  I could be totally wrong, 
    that could work out, but I had thought he was a flanker at Alabama 
    and was considered too small to play a true WR.
    
    Who are all these great free agents that George Young has punted on?
    Phil Simms?  Myron Guyton at $1.5M/per?  Bob Kratch?  Pepper Johnson?  
    BFD.  The whole point to the salary cap is that you can't pay everyone 
    the $2M that they want.  When you're coming off some great seasons but
    have already started to slip, you can _expect_ to lose name veterans 
    like that.  It's part of the game now.   You could do the 49ers thing 
    (which wouldn't have worked for the Giants anyway), but we've had that
    debate; I don't think you can expect a team to usurp the system.  When
    a team's getting old like that and slipping anyway, it's best to just
    move on rather than spend yourself into a further slide.
    
    glenn
    
56.1776CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Fri Mar 03 1995 16:4812
Heard some of the press conferance driving back from a meeting. 
Tuna said that he wouldn't use Meggett as a regular kick-off
returner.  He said he will be a punt returner, and play back.  He
expects him to be on the field about 400-450 plays.

Tuna also said that he doesn't know how the team is going to look
next year.  The guys who are free agents are "not his players"
anymore, and that he is not counting on any of them to sign.  I
didn't hear it, but he was supposed to have side-stepped a question
about Marion Butts' future with the team.

=bob=
56.1777USCTR1::GARBARINODean &gt; BumhiemFri Mar 03 1995 16:5914
re:  Young and the Giants

They did the right thing with Simms.  He *might* have gotten them to the
playoffs, where they would have been trashed by either SF or Dallas (if
they won their 1st game).  Instead, they save his money, determine that
Brown IS their QB for the next 10 years, and miss the playoffs on a tie-
breaker.  This year their good, young WR (?) should emerge, and I expect
their offense to be better.  They'll be in the playoff hunt again.


re:  Meggett getting 400-450 plays

I'll believe it when I see it.  Parcells' biggest problem was getting
the 'tough yard' when he had to.  Meggett ain't gonna get it for him.
56.1778MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Mar 03 1995 17:2915
    >> I could be totally wrong, that could work out, but I had thought 
    >> he was a flanker at Alabama  and was considered too small to play 
    >> a true WR.
    
       Sounds like you have him confused with David Palmer who was Mr.
       Everything at Alabama. He was the guy for whom size was a question
       and the probable reason why he wasn't taken higher.
    
    >> Who are all these great free agents that George Young has punted on?
    >> Phil Simms?  Myron Guyton at $1.5M/per?  Bob Kratch?  Pepper Johnson?  
    >> BFD.
    
       Bart Oates was the only ex-Giant that I can recall from the Pro
       Bowl.    
  
56.1779Kevin LeeIMBETR::DUPREZFri Mar 03 1995 17:484

He's *at least* 6'2" - I'm not sure about his weight.  Height is certainly
not a problem with him.
56.1780CAMONE::WAYUSS Perch, SS 176, In MemoriamFri Mar 03 1995 17:4933
|    >> Who are all these great free agents that George Young has punted on?
|    >> Phil Simms?  Myron Guyton at $1.5M/per?  Bob Kratch?  Pepper Johnson?  
|    >> BFD.
|    
|       Bart Oates was the only ex-Giant that I can recall from the Pro
|       Bowl.    

Oates and Kratch added depth to the o-line.  One of the biggest problems
the Giants had this year was Brian Williams tipping the plays with his
stance.  Oates would not have made that mistake.  I'd have taken Kratch
over the guy they had at guard this season.... The guy who hurt his
knee when someone jumped on him after one of the games finished... Can't
remember his name.

Pepper Johnson wasn't a George Young fiasco -- Reeves cut him outright
because he couldn't stand having him shooting his mouth off in the locker
room.   Wasn't Pepper one of the leading tacklers on this Browns this year?

They let Mark Collins get away, and should have kept him because the corners
were suspect this season especially.

As to the rest, I'll have to look them up.


And I still say that if George Young is so great, they wouldn't have
gotten him an "assistant" to handle salary cap issues....

The game has passed ol' Jug Ears by......


'Saw
  

56.1781HTHMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 07 1995 14:312
    
      Glen, this is the part where you pop in and say, "Oh? Never mind."
56.1782Could be a stealAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Wed Mar 29 1995 20:336
    
    
      I just heard a rumor about Herschel Walker comming to the Pats as a
    1-2 down back.  Is this a joke or is there something to it?
    
    Jerry
56.1783Still a great oneMASALA::DWALLACEWed Mar 29 1995 21:033
    He'd be the ideal solution to their RB problem. Block, run & pass
    catcher for tink bucks. I'd say go for it ....if SF don't beat you
    to it.
56.1784isfhOUTSRC::HEISERnext year in Jerusalem!Mon Apr 03 1995 23:041
56.1785SNAX::ERICKSONMoney + Boredom = MJTue Apr 04 1995 13:327
    
    	Patriots also signed a WR. Who played for the Calgary Stampeders
    the last 3 seasons.
    	Parcells has now added three 300+ pound players to the team. In
    Dellanbach, Roberts, and White (Not the good Reggie).
    
    Ron
56.1786TOOK::HALPINTIMEOUT!!! oops, never mind...Tue Apr 04 1995 15:1515
    
    >WOW!  REGGIE WHITE IS NOW ON THE PATS!!
    
    	Sorry Mike, not 'The Reggie White". This guy was a backup
    with the Chargers. Drafted in the 6th round in '92 out of
    N.C. A&T. 
    
    	White has been told he is expected to play Nose Tackle,
    a position he's nevered played. Tim Goad apparently is done
    has a Patriot. He's expected to sign with Cleveland for 
    $1 Million....
    
    JimH
    
    
56.1787OUTSRC::HEISERnext year in Jerusalem!Tue Apr 04 1995 15:361
56.1788CAMONE::WAYUSS Pickerel SS-177, On Eternal PatrolTue Apr 04 1995 16:191
If Cleveland is signing Goad, then I guess they don't want Howard....
56.1789MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Apr 04 1995 17:2121
    
    >> Tim Goad apparently is done has a Patriot. He's expected to sign 
    >> with Cleveland for $1 Million....
    
       It's because of things like this that I have no affinity or sympathy
       for the management of sports franchises. Here's a guy who literally
       bled for the Pats and who has done a solid job for them his entire
       career. He's been here through what can mildly be put as the 'lean
       years' and he was looking forward to much better times. But now he 
       doesn't fit into one of managements neat little profiles of what size 
       someone who plays his position should be so there is no room at the
       inn for Tim Goad. Tim's proven himself here and yet they won't pay 
       him what they're paying folks who haven't proven themseleves anywhere.
       As is usually the case loyalty is a one way street in professional 
       sports and that's why I loved today's front page article in the
       Globe about how badly the baseball owners screwed themselves this
       past year. The rich get richer and the poor get the picture, but
       not always. Sometimes we get a good belly laugh at their expense.
       I hope Goad gets what he deserves and that's certainly to be treated
       much better than Parcells and the Pats have treated him.
    
56.1790DZIGN::ROBICHAUDL.T. - What a Man!Tue Apr 04 1995 18:127
	Here, here Thomas.  Also what's this I hear about the Macroni and
Cheese man charging an outrageous surcharge fee to certain ticket agencies 
for "preferred seats"?  Could this be a presage of things to come with us
"regular" (i.e. pre-Parcells) season ticket holders?  Could it be that some
rust is starting to appear on the White Knight's armor?

				    /Don
56.1791MKOTS3::LONGPlay ball!!Wed Apr 05 1995 15:3412
    >   As is usually the case loyalty is a one way street in professional 
    >   sports...
    
    I don't even think the road is even open anymore.  It has been
    overgrown with weeds and filled with potholes!  That's the point I
    was trying to make with the entry a few days ago in the Pirate note.
    Loyalty from either the player, or the owner, is only as far as the
    checkbook can stretch it, or the talent is still peaking.
    
    
    
    billl
56.1792DZIGN::ROBICHAUDDon'tCallMeFishRookie!Wed Apr 05 1995 15:549
	There was never any loyalty in sports.  Owners treated players like 
pieces of meat on a hook in the Golden Age of Sports.  Now that players have 
a modicum of leverage, unlike the "good old days" when they were basically 
indentured servants, owners appeal to fans sense of the loss of loyalty to 
the franchise.  Course these same owners would pack up and leave these fans 
in a nanosecond if they could find a sweetheart of a deal like Georgia 
Frontiere got from the lemmings in Saint Louis.

				   /Don
56.1793the baseball players were rightMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Apr 05 1995 16:2724
    
  > I don't even think the road is even open anymore.  It has been
  > overgrown with weeds and filled with potholes!  That's the point I
  > was trying to make with the entry a few days ago in the Pirate note.
  > Loyalty from either the player, or the owner, is only as far as the
  > checkbook can stretch it, or the talent is still peaking.
   
    That's not the case with Goad. He desperately wants to remain a 
    Patriot and has said as much. And even though he has a million dollar
    offer I'm positive the Pats could get him for less (but not some ridic-
    ulous amount) because he was here when the team stink stank stunk and 
    he wants to be here now that there's been a real turnaround and real 
    possibilities of going all the way, he's said that much too. To me, 
    Tim Goad is exhibit 'A' of why players should get what they can while 
    they can because when owners have no use for you, they have no use for 
    you and it doesn't matter how much blood, sweat and tears you've given 
    them. We saw that with Carlton Fisk, we saw that with Reggie Robie when 
    the Dolphins cut him while he was in bankruptcy proceedings and we're 
    seeing it with Tim Goad. When guys like Bob Kraft say they're in this 
    business to help the community, you'd have to be five cans short of a 
    six pack to believe him completely.
    
    
56.1794MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Apr 07 1995 15:0317
    
      According to this morning's papers, Tim Goad is a goner.
     The general consensus is that Goad was too light in the 
     butt for Parcells' liking. That combined with Goad coming
     off of an injury and the fact that Goad's backup signed for 
     6.4 mil over four years with the Giants made Tim expendable
     and expensive. Watching Goad for seven years here I always
     thought he was a bright spot and not a detriment and that
     the lack of upfield pressure from either defensive end pos-
     ition was the biggest problem with the d-line. Three other 
     playoff teams (Chiefs, Vikes and Browns) think enough of
     Goad to either have given him an offer or bring him in for a 
     look. Cleveland has offered 1 mil. But obviously Big Tuna 
     has forgotten more about football than I'll ever know and
     he's determined to build *his* team *his* way so I'll have to 
     assume that this was best for the Patsies SB hopes.  That 
     doesn't make it any easier to swallow.
56.1795CAMONE::WAYUSS Pickerel SS-177, On Eternal PatrolFri Apr 07 1995 15:131
Funny, we have a similar situation in New York with the Giants.....
56.1796This will come back to haunt himAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Fri Apr 07 1995 16:1912
    
    
      I haven't really had a hard time accepting any of the Tuna's moves,
    even with the bust of Butts, but this doesn't look good.  Why sign
    300 lb backups for 1Mill plus and not even offer your starter anything
    but, "I'll help you with your packing Tim".  Yea, Goad was on the light
    side but he still was a team leader in tackles and was in the backfield
    more than super rookie McGinist.  I hope these backups prove me wrong
    but if they were that good (1Mill) they'd have started for their old
    team don't you think.
    
    Jerry
56.1797CNTROL::CHILDSEnd Corporate Welfare Instead!Fri Apr 07 1995 16:328
 you guys are too hung up on sacks. Parcells is bring in these jumbo players
 to be run stuffers and guys who tie up the offensive linemen allowing Slade
 and Willie to be the sackers artists. Willie didn't have a clue early on
 but seemed solid to me by the end of the year. Much like Slade did. These
 two could terrorize QB's by themselves if they're not doubled teamed...

 mike
56.1798MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Apr 07 1995 17:4919
 >> you guys are too hung up on sacks. Parcells is bring in these jumbo 
 >> players to be run stuffers and guys who tie up the offensive linemen 
 >> allowing Slade and Willie to be the sackers artists. Willie didn't have 
 >> a clue early on but seemed solid to me by the end of the year. Much like 
 >> Slade did. These two could terrorize QB's by themselves if they're not 
 >> doubled teamed...

    I have no beef with the defensive linemen Parcells signed, especially
    John Hand. It's the signing that he didn't make that bugs me. I'm not
    sure who he'll put at nose tackle that'll be an improvement over Goad.
    As for Slade and McGinest, Slade shows signs of being a major force and
    a guy capable of 10-15 sacks a year - no LT but and AT (Andre Tippett)
    perhaps. McGinest, on the other hand, is rougher than grade 3 sandpaper 
    and was manhandled one on one by every tight end or tackle that lined up 
    against him. His main attribue right now is that he can keep one guymod-
    erately busy. Richmond Webb could hold him off with one arm and Mike Pitts
    with the other. Dwayne Sabb is a better backer but wants out.
    
56.1799OUTSRC::HEISERnext year in Jerusalem!Fri Apr 14 1995 17:331
56.1800SNARFOUTSRC::HEISERnext year in Jerusalem!Fri Apr 14 1995 17:341
56.1801MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Apr 20 1995 17:1611
    
  >> Who are the Pats looking to draft?
    
     According to Will "The Fossil" McDonough, the Pats are after a RB
     and like James Stewart out of Tennessee and if he's not available
     they also like James Stweart out of Miami. 
    
     In other news, the Pats have stated that the offense will be just
     as wide open this year as last year. No smashmouth offense here,
     they plan to take full advantage of Bledose, Coates and Brisby. 
     
56.1802OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaThu Apr 20 1995 17:372
56.1803IMBETR::DUPREZThu Apr 20 1995 17:498
>    Why Stewart if they have Hampton?  I'm not sure of their position, but
>    why not another receiver to compliment Bledsoe?

I assume you mean Meggett.  Hampton is a Giant.

RE: a receiver - they used their 2nd round pick last year on Kevin Lee of
Alabama, who promptly broke his jaw and was out for the year.  If he pans
out, receiver is less of a need...
56.1804RB or OL in first roundILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersThu Apr 20 1995 17:5219
>>    Why Stewart if they have Hampton?  

	Hampton is still with the Giants (though rumored to be on the trading 
	block). The Patriots did pick up Dave Meggett.

	Popular thought is that Megget is a "third down" back and the Patriots
	still need a work horse for first and second downs (what Butts was
	supposed to be).

>>    I'm not sure of their position, but why not another receiver to 
>>    compliment Bledsoe?

	The Patriots do NOT need another rookie wide receiver. They have
	Brisby (young), Kevin Lee (missed his rookie year because of injury,
	broken jaw I believe) and the new guy from the CFL. They could use
	a veteran receiver, but not another youngster to compliment Drew.

	Vinny

56.1805same differenceOUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaThu Apr 20 1995 18:381
56.1806MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Apr 20 1995 19:014
  >> I always get Meggett and Hampton confused.
    
     Understandable. One is 5'7" 190 lbs and the other is 6'2" 220 pounds.
     Their own moms can't tell them apart.
56.1807PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingThu Apr 20 1995 19:043
    Tommy, stop it...yer killing me!
    
    Mark.
56.1808exitCNTROL::CHILDSThu Apr 20 1995 19:404
    
    welcome back Tommy, we missed ya..........
    
     hahaha
56.1809OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaThu Apr 20 1995 20:101
56.1810Isn't there a rivalry??ILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersFri Apr 21 1995 13:177
>>    Their moms probably watch more Giant games than I do.

	But aren't the Giants one of the Arizona Cardinals big division
	rivals??? So you see them in town once a year and YOUR team
	visits them once a year ... hmmmmm ...


56.1811OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaFri Apr 21 1995 15:452
56.1812MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Apr 25 1995 13:5810
    
      Did anyone else notice that ESPN had no footage on the Pats #1
     pick and none of the panel had any comment? It pretty much came 
     out of left field. I have a sneaking suspicion that Ty Law has 
     little chance of making the Pats and that Parcells got his guys 
     in the later rounds so that he can pay them later round money.
    
     BTW - Jets fans are brain-dead for booing the selection of Kyle Brady.
           He and Coates will be trading the starting spot in the Pro Bowl
           back and forth for the next 6 years.
56.1813dump MitchellHBAHBA::HAASYou ate my hiding place.Tue Apr 25 1995 14:028
Re: Kyle Brady.

I agree, Tommy.

Johnny Mitchell, while a_obvious talent, is a_equally apparent head case.
The Jets will try to unload him before everyone else realizes this.

TTom
56.1814USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Apr 25 1995 15:246
>     BTW - Jets fans are brain-dead for booing the selection of Kyle Brady.

While it wasn't fair to Brady, it was appropriate for the clowns that
run the Jets.  They have many needs, and TE isn't one of them.  This
pick only makes sense if they move Mitchell.  I just don't believe
in the productiveness of the 2-TE set as a primary offensive formation.
56.1815repeatHBAHBA::HAASYou ate my hiding place.Tue Apr 25 1995 15:368
I remember when the Jets picked Lungeman (sp?), the linebacker outta
Virginia a couple of years ago. They moaned and groaned then and all he
did was to go on and become a_all-pro.

Also, we must all remember that Kotite is now the coach. His abilities to
field and manage a team have yet to be proven.

TTom
56.1816just curious...BSS::MENDEZTue Apr 25 1995 16:486
    No doubt about it...Kyle Brady appears to be headed for greatness as
    tight-end.  But don't they have some other more pressing needs??
    DL, WR, RB, LB???
    
    Frank Mendez
    
56.1817USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Apr 25 1995 18:005
>Also, we must all remember that Kotite is now the coach. His abilities to
>field and manage a team have yet to be proven.

Not sure about this.  I thought he did a pretty good job in Philly with
what he had.
56.1818may beHBAHBA::HAASYou ate my hiding place.Tue Apr 25 1995 18:0612
I think Kotite is one of those coaches that does OK when all is going
well and when it doesn't, you caint really count on him to do much about
it. This is basically the opinion I expressed concerngin Bristow with the
Hornets.

I would think that the consensus in Philly is that he is not one of the
better coaches in the NFL, especially Randall Cunningham.

When he came to Philly, they're roster was capable of contending for the
playoffs. Only later did attrition, death and free agency take over.

TTom
56.1819LT to return?ODIXIE::ZOGRANYoungest one's walking - OH NO!Wed May 10 1995 12:4212
    Guess you Pats fans are all excited today with the prospect that LT may
    be coming out of retirement to play for the Big Tuna.

    According to the paper, LT was so inspired by the sweat he worked up
    training for his Wrestlemania match with Bam Bam Bigelow that he is
    considering coming out of retirement.   He's going to meet with
    Parcells to discuss the possibility of a return to the field.

    Guess the restaurant not's doing so well, huh?
    
    
    UMDan
56.1820IMHOWMOIS::BUCKLEY_MWed May 10 1995 13:508
    	Mike Lynch of Ch. 5 reported this morning that it is only a 30%
    	chance he will become a Patriot.  If LT was 10 years younger and
    	had more years in him but I don't think the Pats will go for it.
    	They have 3 fine OLB's Slade, McGinest, and Saab.  If LT came 
    	back he would have to make the minimum b/c the Pats are near
    	the max on the Salary cap.  I would like to see LT on the Pats 
    	sideline as a Motivator/LB Coach but not as a player.  
        
56.1821No LTCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Wed May 10 1995 17:504
    I'd be more excited if Bam Bam Bigelow was going to sign with the Pats.
    They need a few more 300+ pound nose tackles.  :^)
    
    Mike
56.1822DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFunny BoneFri May 26 1995 16:277
	Gee if this SissyPlex deal ever gets finalized Mr Macaroni and
Cheese can rid the stadium of working class stiffs like me Denny and Chap 
with one to two thousand dollar personal seat licenses and make the place 
safe for the newfaux fans to eat quiche and drink wine coolers while 
watching their longtime favorite team play.

				   /Don
56.1823bad enough a new helmet....WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri May 26 1995 17:238
    
    I, for one, will be trading in my primo Section 106 season tix
    if the Pats move to this joke of a $%^&@! dome.
    
    And don't ask me to sell them to you, 'cause Kraft outlawed
    transferring season tickets last year - gotta turn 'em in.
    
    - Sean
56.1824SALEM::DODAChairman of the BoredSat May 27 1995 19:068
/Don,

Don't be so hard on yourself, labelling yourself a 
"working class stiff". 

"Stiff" will suffice.

daryll
56.1825PSDVAX::ROBICHAUDDon'tTakeComedyFromStrangersWed Jul 19 1995 11:3012
	Looks like Mr. Macaroni and Cheese is indeed financially strapped.  
This year's tickets are being delivered via UPS (which makes it a real bitch 
for those of us who work for a living, you know what I mean if you've ever 
had to deal with a UPS delivery).  Luckily Chap was home yesterday for the 
second attempt at delivery.  Another friend wasn't so lucky and was told 
yesterday that if he wasn't at the Leominster UPS depot by 7:00 tonight the 
package was going back!  Considering Mr. White Collar had almost two 
hundred dollars of my money since December, you would think he could've 
splurged and used Uncle Sam to bring us our season tickets.  Hope he's 
using the money he saved to sign a real running back.

				   /Don
56.1826lost a ring, trusting uncle sammyCNTROL::CHILDSWatch out Big Brother's watching!Wed Jul 19 1995 11:385
    
     You mean to say you trust the post office?????????? Unless it's
     insured, it's open game............
    
     mike
56.1827PSDVAX::ROBICHAUDDon'tTakeComedyFromStrangersWed Jul 19 1995 12:064
    	Used to come in a registered letter Mike.  Course that was in the
    fiscally irresponsible days of the Sullivans.
    
    				   /Don
56.1828you got off lightHBAHBA::HAAStime compressedWed Jul 19 1995 13:566
Delivered!

Hail, we gotta go pick ours up and the steenkin games are being played at
Clemson, to boot.

TTom
56.1829PSDVAX::ROBICHAUDDon'tTakeComedyFromStrangersFri Jul 21 1995 12:106
    	Hey TTom, that's what I would expect from the organization that
    brought the "Personal Seat License" scam to sports.  Whether there's a
    SissyPlex or the Pats move to another New England site, the PSL scam
    will be a reality for Pats season ticket holders too.  8^(
    
    				   /Don
56.1830CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianFri Jul 21 1995 12:173
Personal Seat License?


56.183142 million,7 years,11.5 mil siging bonusCNTROL::CHILDSWatch out Big Brother's watching!Fri Jul 21 1995 12:256
    
    Yo Slash, how much of Bledsoe's salary are you paying??????????
    Not a bad piece of change for Drew. 240K per interception. Puts
    him right up there with Elway..........
    
    mike
56.1832PSDVAX::ROBICHAUDDon'tTakeComedyFromStrangersFri Jul 21 1995 12:254
    	Go back to the Panthers note 'Saw.  I'm pretty sure TTom explained
    it in detail.
    
    				   /Don
56.1833PSDVAX::ROBICHAUDDon'tTakeComedyFromStrangersFri Jul 21 1995 12:285
    	Hey Mike, since I had to pick up a friend's ticket who was having
    money trouble last winter, I'm paying more of Drew's salary than I
    would like.  
    
    				   /Don
56.1834CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianFri Jul 21 1995 12:396
>    	Go back to the Panthers note 'Saw.  I'm pretty sure TTom explained
>    it in detail.
    
I remember now.

Jeez, they'll squeeze a buck out of you any way they can....
56.1835SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Fri Jul 21 1995 13:045
    
    	Ty Law signed a 5yr 5.5 million dollar deal.
    
    
    Ron
56.1836ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 21 1995 13:174
56.1837USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jul 21 1995 14:013
>    	Ty Law signed a 5yr 5.5 million dollar deal.

Yeah, he got what fell out of Bledsoe's pocket...
56.1838PSL, a way of lifeHBAHBA::HAAStime compressedFri Jul 21 1995 15:0216
Yeah, the PSL, the wave of the future :=(

MtfM really raked me over the coals on that one. 

It does my heart good, however, to find that there are other saps in the
world who are willing to pay fees they may never get back for the right
to pay inflated ticket prices to see overpriced, spoilt talent, all in
the hopes that, throug the daze, you can remember what a good time you
had hootin some beers.

I'm thinking about just buying one of those industrial size trash cans,
put it in the den in front of the TVs, have a couple of friends to blow
smoke in my face, while I drink semi-tepid draft beer. 'Bout the same
thing.

TTom
56.1839WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Jul 21 1995 15:1712
    
    re. Pats tickets:
    
      2 years ago:  Came to post office, but you had to go down to get them, 
                    they would not deliver them.
      Lasted year:  Came to the mailbox
      This year:    UPS
    
    Personall, I do not *want* those tickets delivered to my mailbox.  Too
    risky.  
    
    - Sean
56.1840Thank God for Saps !USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jul 21 1995 15:279
>It does my heart good, however, to find that there are other saps in the
>world who are willing to pay fees they may never get back for the right
>to pay inflated ticket prices to see overpriced, spoilt talent, all in
>the hopes that, throug the daze, you can remember what a good time you
>had hootin some beers.

Well, if you're a fan of the local team you should thank all those "saps"
'cause their spending removes the blackout so you can see all 16 games
on TV for FREE !
56.1841MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Fri Jul 21 1995 15:557
    
        Er, Joe, I think TTom is saying that he's a season
        ticketholder so he's not affected by the blackout.
        Besides, PSLs have nothing to do with blackouts.
        The seats would have been sold anyways. All a PSL is
        is a creative way for owners to fleece the public
        yet again. 
56.1842awesome shoes!OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jul 21 1995 15:561
56.1843CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianFri Jul 21 1995 17:3010
Well, if you gotta pony up $$$ for a PSL, they oughta put your name right on
the seat.

That way, when someone says, "Is that *your* seat?" you can say "Sure, my name
is on it right here"  

Actually down there it'd probably sound like "rat-cheer"


'Saw
56.1844semi memorial\HBAHBA::HAAStime compressedFri Jul 21 1995 18:089
Rat-cheer is it and where rat-cheer is a memorial plaque type thang for
all of us that were duped into going for the PSL scam. You get something
like 28 letters and space for you name so I went for

		THOMAS JOHN JOSEPH HAAS

I knew that confirmation name would come in handy some day ;-).

TTom
56.1845CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianFri Jul 21 1995 19:006
Oh hell, I'd gone for 

	Thomas R. E. Lee Haas


People'd be bowing at yer feet....8^)
56.1846ONOFRE::MAY_BRMich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &amp;1beerFri Jul 21 1995 19:044
    
    How about Yee Haas.  They'd think you were a real southerner then.
    
    brews
56.1847Ol' HaasAKOCOA::BREENFri Jul 21 1995 20:003
    Or Cartwright Haas
    
    Oops there I go with that Cart before the Haas again
56.1848OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jul 21 1995 20:401
56.1849CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianMon Jul 24 1995 13:037
TTom's not even here (what the hell does the T stand for anyway) and yunz guys
is making fun of him.

I'm telling!


8^)
56.1850I'm still laughin' at that one!TNPUBS::NAZZARORIP Andrea 1/18/85 - 7-21/94Tue Jul 25 1995 14:533
    !!!!  The Cart before the Haas?!?!?!?!?!?!?
    
    NAZZ
56.185131-7 whoa!OLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyolgistFri Aug 18 1995 14:213
    
    No comments on last nights debacle in Philly. I know it's preseason,
    but the Pats looked pretty weak. 
56.1852how bout them ColtsHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyFri Aug 18 1995 15:188
So based on preseason so far, it should be Indianapolis as a lock to win
the AFC East.

The Pats get blowed out. Miami loses to J'Ville and then pulls a complete
no show the nexted week. Buffalo hasn't showed much and we all know the
Jets are coached by Rick Kotite.

TTom
56.1853CAMONE::WAYOfficer on deck!Fri Aug 18 1995 15:205
What little I watched was pretty poor.

The looked like they were half a beat out of sync all night.

They actually made Crandall Runningham look good....
56.1854ho hum, it's preseasonOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Aug 18 1995 16:093
56.1855cling onHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyFri Aug 18 1995 16:473
yes but the Panthers have no records, save thised preseason.

TTom
56.1856AKEEM::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planFri Aug 18 1995 21:008
    
    re: OUTSRC::HEISER
    >The SB Champs have had losing preseason records the past few years.
    
    Is he on the Cards bandwagon or the Pats - now you see him now you
    don't.  Heisersville, USA (tm) - the location of the latest sports
    championship town, because you know heiser will always be on the 
    bandwagon.
56.1857nice ring to thatOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Aug 18 1995 21:151
56.1858ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planSun Sep 03 1995 02:2927
56.1859ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planSun Sep 03 1995 12:3620
56.1860ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats rule Browns!Sun Sep 03 1995 23:243
56.1861If the Pats suck what do the 'Spots doAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsTue Sep 05 1995 12:3216
    
    
    
     Good thing games aren't played with a video game.  Pats won in last
    minute 17-14.  Great game by both teams.  Hurst gets smoked for a 70
    yarder on 'Spots first possesion.  Pats down 7-3.  Get another FG to
    make it 7-6 and the 'Spots put up another TD to make it 14-6 at the
    half.  Hurst had that one played well but just didn't get it done.
    2nd half the D becomes a solid wall and Bledsoe puts up 11 points for
    the win.  Martin, Moore where great as was Coates (surprise there uh)
    and Bledsoe throws for 302 yards with 0 ints.  Lane did a great job
    filling in for Harlow at RT.  With the Squeelers loosing Woodson and
    O'Donnell looks like we may have had a preview of the AFC championship
    game.
    
    Jerry
56.1862SNAX::ERICKSONWhen will the Tribe Choke?Tue Sep 05 1995 13:1317
    
    	Great game to watch. The new beef on the Defensive line. Did a
    great job at glogging up the middle. Which enabled the LB's to fill
    the holes. The Browns running game looks like last years Patriots.
    No Speed in the backfield to bump it outside. Hoard is much better
    then Butts. Yet it that isn't enough. The up the middle running game isn't
    going to cut it. The Browns will miss Metcalf. Yes, they have Rison. 
    Looks like the Rison/Metcalf trade. Improved Cleveland's passing game, 
    but hurt the running game a little.
    	Lets hope Bledsoe can continue what he started on Sunday, No
    INT's and 302 yrds. He spread the ball around to 6 different receivers.
    He looked good at reading the defense. Then throwing to the open
    receiver. He only forced in a couple of passes. Time to bring on the
    fish. Who looked good on opening day. Hurst better get his arse in gear
    this week. Or Marino to Fryar is going to be heard a lot next week.
    
    Ron
56.1863CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MTue Sep 05 1995 13:1712
I watched the early part of the game then had to go to a party.

Kept getting scores fed to us from the young 'uns who were watching the game.
Couldn't believe the final score.

Later, saw some highlights.  Couldn't quite tell from the highlights, but
I can speculate that the Browns were guilty of what the Giants were guilty
of in the early Parcell years -- get a lead, try not to lose, lose on the
last drive.


Nice win for the Pats.
56.1864OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Sep 05 1995 16:0516
56.1865WMOIS::MAZURKASon_of_A_Wicked_Good_TimeTue Sep 05 1995 19:425
    Well,I'm Glad that Micheal(Hee_Hee)Had his Big_Game and got it over
    with....   Big Win fer The_Pats.
    
    
       Crazy_Revenge_Tastes_Sweet_Al
56.1866cleveland....just plain stinks.FABSIX::E_MAXWELLN.E. Patriots...Bound for glory.Thu Sep 07 1995 04:4513
          Well I've made it to two Pats games in '96, ( no-preseason ).
    This win against the browns was especially sweet, helps ease the pain
    from driving 8.5 hours to cleveland for new years. Best sight of the
    day was a plane overhead with a banner reading...."What's brown and
    stinks?....cleveland!". 8 tickets arrived at my buddies door saturday
    for the Patriots-falcons game. This should prove to be one hell of
    a road trip, can't wait. 
    
          Patriots      27
          marino        21
    
    
                                                         Lil Ed 
56.1867San Fran gameOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Sep 07 1995 15:571
56.1868CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Sep 07 1995 16:061
    nope
56.1869exZEKE::CAMILLERIFri Sep 08 1995 17:177
    
    Does anyone know if the New_england_patriots notes file moved from
    there old location RMVMS::New_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS?
    
    
    
    Thanks, Mark
56.1870SNAX::ERICKSONGehring &lt;===&gt; RipkenMon Sep 11 1995 14:287
    
    	The Patriots notesfile is still on RMVMS::NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS.
    The owner of the system moved from HLO to LJO. He is waiting for a
    new node name address. Once he has a new ENET address it will be
    posted.
    
    Ron
56.1871Frustration .......AKOCOA::DFARRELLDennis Farrell -- AKO2-3/F1Mon Sep 11 1995 15:4267
    Since the Pats notesfile is down, I guess I'll have to do my whining in
    here.  I am a season ticket holder who was at yesterday's excuse for
    a competitive game and have the following things to say:
    
    - The Pats shot themselves in the foot by not capitalizing on the
      opportunities they had from turnovers (Reynolds INT, Parmelee
      fumble, etc.).
    
    - The Miami defense stuffed the Pats ground game.  I hope all the
      idiots who thought the Pats had a legitimate ground game based on
      one good performance by Curtis Martin vs. the Browns have now come
      back down to earth.  I think Curtis Martin is going to be a great
      NFL back but he needs more help up front and when you play against
      a good run defense, you ain't goin' nowhere !!
    
    - The Pats did not necessarily lose the game as a result of some bad
      (certainly very questionable) calls by the zebras, but you have to
      wonder what the outcome of the game might have been if they got a
      couple of breaks on the calls.  For example, the complexion of the
      game and the sequence of play calling would have been very different
      if the TD pass to Will Moore (yes -- it was a catch -- it happened 
      right in front of me and the reply verified it) counted and the
      score would have been 17-10.  Other questionable calls that just 
      ruined the Pats momentum:
    
      1. First Miami drive --- Pats stop Fins on 3rd down forcing a punt
         but wait -- there's a flag.  Ferric Collons called for an illegal
         hand in the face -- Dolphins get a 2nd chance and drive for a FG.
         Right away, zebras give us a preview of things they can do with
         their yellow hankies !!
    
      2. Two defensive holding penalties on Pats DBs keep Miami drives
         alive !  More over-officiating !!
    
      3. Pass interference call against Hurst for "bumping" Fryar (or
         was it Parmelee ?).  Puleeassee --- both men have the same right
         to the ball !
       
      4. Reynolds interception and score nullified because the zebras
         said Fryar tackled him.  Sorry --- Reynolds bounced off Fryar
         after the INT and should have been allowed to get up an run.
    
      5. Aforementioned catch by Will Moore for a TD was nullified.
         The guy who nullified it was the Umpire about 30 yards away
         who did not even have a good angle on the catch.
    
      6. TD pass to Coates nullified by offensive pass interference.  I
         saw the replay on this one and would have to say, as they say
         in basketball, this one should have been a "non-call".  Coates
         and Cox bumped into each other, I don't think either one initiated
         the contact.
    
    But hey, who am I to whine ?? I only paid $640 for 2 season tickets to
    see a bunch of old, out of shape guys attempt to control a game that
    they clearly can't keep up with.  As I said on my opening remark, the
    Pats were still in the game (despite the refs) in the 4th quarter and
    failed to punch the ball in.  
    
    You just gotta wonder what the final score would have been if the game 
    had been called correctly (IMHO).  You also gotta wonder if all those 
    things many people have said over the years about Shula's presence on 
    the NFL Rules Committee influencing the refs is true too ??  I would 
    hope not --- but you can't convince me otherwise after watching that 
    farce yesterday !! 
    
    DF
                                                      
56.1872OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Sep 11 1995 16:304
56.1873STAR::ALLISONMon Sep 11 1995 16:5912
    Is anyone else tired of seeing Vincent "I Want it in the
    Clutch" Brisby drop the easy ones.. Granted, trying to catch a
    bullet from Bledsoe behind you is not always easy, but he did
    seem to drop more than his share yesterday...
    
    Good to see Moore picking up the slack. I can him becoming 
    the #1 target soon if he isn't already...
    
    I have to wonder about instant reply -- would that have made a difference
    in the game? Maybe all the Pats needed was a passing TD in the
    Dead Zone to break out of the slump...
    
56.1874MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Mon Sep 11 1995 18:0013
    
      Anyone, who thinks the Pats lost because of the refereeing, wasn't
     paying attention. The Pats flat out got whupped by the best team in
     the AFC. And Miami's miscues was the only thing keeping it from being
     even more embarassing. Their o-line pushed Big Tuna's bigger-isn't-
     always-better d-line around like they were blocking sleds. Early on
     it looked like Miami might chalk up 300 yards rushing. Marino is
     Marino despite the miscues and he managed to consistently get rid of
     the ball just before the Pats could get to him. Their defense shut 
     down Coates, Martin and Meggett and disrupted Bledsoe enough to remind
     us that Drew is still a kid and not hardly in Marino's class *yet*.
     A tough loss to take but I think after the first game some of us ob-
     viously needed a reality smack. 
56.1875STAR::ALLISONMon Sep 11 1995 18:189
    Sorry I have to disagree... If you don't think the zebras disrupted
    the flow of the game, you are mistaken. 17 penalties were called. Take back
    any of the following -- Pats stopped Fins on third down, Johnson
    gets called for something, first down. Moores catch down low. Big Ben
    in the endzone.. Sometimes all a team needs is a little lift to get
    going. Nothing deflates the sails more than a few calls like these. 
    
    Yeah, maybe the Fin's o-line shoved them around but the Pats were still in 
    the game until late. 1 call could have made the difference.
56.1876ROCK::GRONOWSKISox swept by Yankees again!Mon Sep 11 1995 18:3520
56.1877exMSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Mon Sep 11 1995 19:1213
    >> 17 penalties were called. Take back any of the following...

       Ten of the penalties were on Miami including a holding call 
       on big Eric Green's 55 yard reception. You know the one where
       he used Maurice Hurst as a doormat. And then there was the bone-
       headed 'failure to report' penalty. Give credit where it's due.
       Miami had 4 turnovers and 10 penalties and they still smoked
       the Pats. Miami did more to keep the Pats in it than the Pats
       did themselves. The scariest part may be is that they stll haven't 
       played their best.
     
    
56.1878ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Sep 11 1995 19:2312
  Could be worse. Any team that has to start out playing Cleveland, Miami, S.F.
could easily end up with an 0-3 record. But the Pats already have one. To bad
they couldn't get another before facing the 49'ers.

  All things considered, even if they are 1-2 that won't be too bad since they
have all those games against the Colts, Jets, and the aging Bills. And the
rest of the NFC West shouldn't be that difficult to beat.

  After next week the other Miami game and the other AFC teams should be about
all they have to worry about Who are the other 3 AFC teams they play this year?

  George
56.1879hope they come out of their coma for S.F!ASIC::CHARRONtime for a changeMon Sep 11 1995 19:2723
    re: .1876
    
    I pictured this pimple-faced little kid, with snot dripping from his
    nose, taunting the other kids from behind his mama's apron when I read 
    your note.... ;)
    
    
    anyhow, the Patriots notes conference is down, so this looks like the 
    place to be. 
    
    The ref's didn't beat the Pats yeasterday. The Pats beat themselves. No
    offense, and little defense will do that to you.... Although, in
    defense of the defense, they did present the offense with a couple of
    opportunities....
    
    The third down call in the first half was an illegal use of the hands
    call which replay showed..... and Coates did push off on that score
    that was called back. It was obvious. The Moore catch could have gone
    either way.
    
    Bottom line is they were beat by a better offense, and a better defense. 
    
    /brian (a Pats fan)
56.1880OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Sep 11 1995 19:3011
56.1881Terrible calls by ref cost Pats 21 pts, but NE still sippedTNPUBS::NAZZARONBA action - it's nonexistantMon Sep 11 1995 19:5827
    Pats defensive line and inside LBs (you too Vincent Brown) had the snot
    kicked out of them by the Fins.  The pats didn't deserve to win this
    game just based on control of the line of scrimmage.
    
    But given that, the zebras stole THREE touchdowns away from the Pats. 
    It tough to lose one touchdown in a game, never mind three.  Here's
    hoping that the zebras have now missed their quota of NE touchdowns
    for the season.
    
    1) Reynolds was obviously not down by contact after the interception.
    Ref simply blew his whistle too soon.  Reynolds touched Fryar from the
    back, but he most certainly wasn't "Down by contact".  Fryar never
    touched him - Reynolds bumpoed into Fryar after the interception, but
    not while he was on the ground.
    
    2) Moore caught the ball.  Simple as that.  The ref 30 yards away who
    oeverruled the closer ref who said it was a catch did not have a better
    angle.  If all the zebras got together to rule the Miami catch legit
    earlier in the game (and it was), why didn' tthey huddle on Moore's TD?
    
    3) Coates did NOT push off on Cox on his TD.  Not even close.  There
    was some contact, but Coates never used his hands, Cox never budged,
    and if you were going to call a penalty on that play, it could have
    been for illegal contact more than 5 yards downfield on Cox.  The right
    call was no call at all.
    
    NAZZ
56.1882SNAX::ERICKSONGehring &lt;===&gt; RipkenMon Sep 11 1995 21:1410
    
    	Anybody who thinks the Patriots are a better football team then
    Miami. Needs to have there eyes examined. Miami improved there football
    team. In every area that was weak last year. They added Eric Green at
    TE. On defense they got a DB (Green Bay), Bryce Paup LB, Steve Emtman
    at DL. I believe there were 1 or 2 other signings. Without any
    signifant loses to Free Agency. I see them weak at Running Back if
    Parmelee goes down.
    
    Ron
56.1883 CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Sep 12 1995 13:446
    
     Bryce Paup plays for the Bills. I think they got Buckley from the
     Packers. I think Pittsburg may have something to say to Miami about
     who the best team in the AFC is this coming monday........
    
    mike
56.1884DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Tue Sep 12 1995 13:549
    
     >> I think Pittsburg may have something to say to Miami about
     >> who the best team in the AFC is this coming monday........
    
        I seriously doubt it with Tomczak at QB and no Rod Woodson
        in the secondary. If Miami can clean up the penalties and
        turnovers, this could be a real blowout because for my money
        Miami is far and away the class of the AFC. And Pittsburg 
        doesn't have the offense to hang with them. 
56.1885Beating the Pats ain't that big a dealCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Sep 12 1995 13:575
    
     but they do have the defense to stop Miami. Miami may indeed win but
     I seriously doubt they'll blow them out........
    
     mike
56.1886A blow out for sure!!!!!CNTROL::SALMONTue Sep 12 1995 16:098
    Re:-1885
    
    Oh, man are you wrong on this one Mikey. Marino's gonna torch em' for
    3-5 TD's. This one's a BLOWOUT! 
    
    
    
                                   JS
56.1887SNAX::ERICKSONEight and counting...Tue Sep 12 1995 16:146
    
    	The Patriots notesfile is back on-line. Here is the new address.
    
    MODIFY ENTRY NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS /FILE=RDVAX::NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS
    
    Ron
56.1888Clever ....AKOCOA::DFARRELLDennis Farrell -- AKO2-3/F1Tue Sep 12 1995 16:2215
    re: .1876
    
    Groaner,
    
    Touche !! Nice plagiarism of my note to you (re: Indians early exit
    from AL playoffs).  I wonder how many other folks in here got it ?
    
    Oh well, did you write this because you're still upset about the Pats
    beating the Brownies last week ?
    
    Remember, you will be eating crow before me.  The Tribe will be out of
    the playoffs in October, the Pats may be home watching the NFL on Fox 
    by early January.
    
    DF
56.1889ROCK::GRONOWSKISox swept by Yankees again!Tue Sep 12 1995 17:173
56.1890They're toast....SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOWed Sep 13 1995 16:369
>    The Indians will trounce the Red Sox in the playoffs, bank on it. 
>    Indians - Yankees ALCS 1995.

Probably, but it will be in the ALCS.

Sox slide to the wild card, and play the Western Division champs in the first
round.  Yankees/Indians play in the first round.

zamboni  Sox Sip 
56.1891ROCK::GRONOWSKISox swept by Yankees again!Mon Sep 18 1995 13:317
56.1892DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Mon Sep 18 1995 14:1910
        Still more eveidence that Drew Bledsoe won't be the
       keynote speaker at any MENSA meetings real soon...

        On three different occasions a 49er defensive linemen
       jumped offsides on third down giving the Pats a free 
       play. On all three occasions not only did Bledsoe not 
       take a chance and go deep, he didn't even throw long
       enough to get the first down if the call was missed.
    
56.1893CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Sep 18 1995 14:4426
>
>        On three different occasions a 49er defensive linemen
>       jumped offsides on third down giving the Pats a free 
>       play. On all three occasions not only did Bledsoe not 
>       take a chance and go deep, he didn't even throw long
>       enough to get the first down if the call was missed.


I don't know if you got to see the entire game up in your area.  Down here we
were treated to seeing the Umpire pick Brown and Hasty run back a 62 yrd
inty for a TD.

Did these things happen after Drew got bounced off his shoulder?  If so
maybe I'd cut him a little slack.  If not, then I'll make sure that the Mensa
folks don't send him an application.  8^)


btw, re the shoulder, the "medical folks" sounded awfully smug that it wasn't
anything serious.  Watching the way he got bounced and the pain level, I kept
thinking it might have been a shoulder separation.  Has there been any
official word on the injury?


'Saw
    

56.1894exDECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Mon Sep 18 1995 15:5619
  >> I don't know if you got to see the entire game up in your area.  

     Yes, I saw the whole entire game. The defense deserved a better fate 
     than that. The first half was absolutely masterful and they gave the
     offense excellent field position which of course they did not capitalize
     on.

  >> Did these things happen after Drew got bounced off his shoulder?  If so
  >> maybe I'd cut him a little slack.  
    
     No excuses. It happened before, during and after. He continues to make
     bone-headed decisions and mistakes. The three missed opportunities 
     were one thing. Then it seemed like every sack could have been avoided.
     He locked on to receivers twice and got blindsided. And then he held
     on to the ball too long twice and got taken down. Ken Norton alluded
     that Bledose had Jim Everett type happy feet. To me he looked a little
     too much like Tony Eason.
    
56.1895CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Sep 18 1995 17:3728
|     The first half was absolutely masterful and they gave the
|     offense excellent field position which of course they did not capitalize
|     on.

I'd have to agree on this....


    
>     No excuses. It happened before, during and after. He continues to make
>     bone-headed decisions and mistakes. The three missed opportunities 
>     were one thing. Then it seemed like every sack could have been avoided.
>     He locked on to receivers twice and got blindsided. And then he held
>     on to the ball too long twice and got taken down. Ken Norton alluded
>     that Bledose had Jim Everett type happy feet. To me he looked a little
>     too much like Tony Eason.

Okay.  I didn't catch this actually -- wasn't paying that much attention.
I was just noticing that they weren't moving the ball.

If I were Tuna, I might have stayed with Zolak -- at least he seemed to
befuddle the Niner defense for a while....  It might have been worth staying
with to see if they could capitalize on it....


'Saw

    

56.1896SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Sep 18 1995 17:5915
  Ok so maybe Bledose had a bad game but look who they were playing. Most
likely if any of us had been crushed by Ken Norton Jr. we'd do some fuzzy
thinking for the next hour or so as well. After all, this was the team that
ground the Cowboys into pulp just 6 months ago. 

  All and all they are not that bad off, they got through Cleveland, Miami,
S.F. and came up 1-2. Could have been better but most teams would have been 0-3
right now wondering what it took to win a game. And losing to the 49'ers 28-3
really isn't that bad, other teams will give them quite a bit more. 

  The tough part of the schedule is over and the Pats have a week off before
they start the easy part.

  GO PATS!!!
  George 
56.1897Bledsoe not the only one with mental deficienciesEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Sep 18 1995 18:209
    
    While the Pats' D played well in the first half, just like last year,
    they are going to have to correct some of these horrendous mental 
    breakdowns that allow a few very easy plays to negate the overall
    effort.  They were able to successfully correct those secondary
    problems late last season...
    
    glenn
    
56.1898ROCK::GRONOWSKISox swept by Yankees again!Mon Sep 18 1995 18:363
56.1899DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Mon Sep 18 1995 18:5222
   >> Ok so maybe Bledose had a bad game but look who they were playing. 
   >> Most likely if any of us had been crushed by Ken Norton Jr. we'd 
   >> do some fuzzy thinking for the next hour or so as well. 

      His thinking has been fuzzy all season to the tune of zero
      TD passes this season. The team's performance in the red zone 
      has been downright horrendous. The hit is a nice excuse but 
      that's all it is. And btw that hit by Norton didn't look nearly 
      bad enough to warrant the reaction by Bledsoe. Drew has a lot of 
      good qualities but it looks like toughness ain't one of them.
      He looked like he really wanted to come out of the game for
      good at that point.

   >> The tough part of the schedule is over and the Pats have a week 
   >> off before they start the easy part.

      In the next four games they have Atlanta (should be a win) but
      then come Denver, KC and Buffalo. If their offense is still this
      pathetic then it won't be so 'easy'.

    
56.1900DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Mon Sep 18 1995 18:5615
    
   >> While the Pats' D played well in the first half, just like last year,
   >> they are going to have to correct some of these horrendous mental 
   >> breakdowns that allow a few very easy plays to negate the overall
   >> effort.  They were able to successfully correct those secondary
   >> problems late last season...
    
      14 of the 28 points can be directly attributed to Bledsoe turnovers.
      But your point is well taken. Maurice Hurst was repeatedly beaten
      badly. And the third and 5 from the SF five when they hit Singleton
      on the slant for about 15 yards was a crusher. That's their bread
      and butter play and you have to know that. The secondary started out
      this way last year and straightened out. Still, 3 points against
      Miami and 3 against SF. Impossible to win that way.
    
56.1901SNAX::ERICKSONTwo and counting...Mon Sep 18 1995 19:249
    
    	In defense of Bledsoe a little bit. After the Norton hit. Drew
    could not move his elbow higher then his shoulder. Its one of those
    you can't do anymore harm injuries. If you can deal with the pain
    you can play. Drew tried to play and the bad shoulder was effecting
    his play. Thus, the coaches should have taken him out. Is a 75% Drew
    Bledsoe better then a 100% Scott Zolak?
    
    Ron
56.1902I'd rather have BeasleyAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsMon Sep 18 1995 19:4023
    
    
      I watched the first and fourth quarters on the idiot box and the
    middle two on the radio (tank is an absolute as$ by the way) and all
    I have to say is the D played extremely well.  I don't buy the fuzzy
    thoughts deal.  Bledsoe HAS to learn to look receivers off or he is
    going to get killed.  Harlow will be back against the chuck and duck
    Falcons so the protection should get a little better.  Overall I saw
    some things in the D that where positve nothing positive can be said
    about the O as far as I'm concerned.  Now I wanted to get in here 
    yesterday and rant and rave but I wanted to cool down a little but 
    after 24 hours I still feel the same.......Is it me or does that 
    calorically challenged non hair havin pant load McGuire have something
    against the Pats.  I know the announcers have to be unbiased but this
    guy is blatent in his hatred for the Pats.  If my memory is right this
    piece of trash had played or had something to do with the Bills at one
    point.  What did John Hannah or Russ Francis run him over one to many
    times?  I can't take that jerk one more game.  I really have a deep
    dislike for this clown and if I where to see him say at the Dedham
    Hilton, where they stayed for opening day, I may have to talk to this
    piece of crap.
    
    Jerry
56.1903news!?!HBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 18 1995 19:477
>      I watched the first and fourth quarters on the idiot box and the
>    middle two on the radio ...


You watched the 2nd and 3rd quarters on radio? ;-).

TTom
56.1904my badAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsMon Sep 18 1995 20:014
    
    
    
    don't you all have the dish on the roof?
56.1905usually it's in front of the trailer ;^]HBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 18 1995 20:150
56.1906Since I probably won't be able to ask OJAKOCOA::BREENMon Sep 18 1995 20:514
    I may be able to find out that question since I know Paul Seymour of
    those 70s Bills and my bil knows him real well.  He didn't have any
    comment about bills-pats except great respect for Grogan of course but
    I'll try to pry it out of him.
56.1907How some of these guys keep their jobs is a mystery...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Sep 18 1995 21:0013
    
    Paul McGuire was definitely Buffalo Bills but I think he was long gone
    by the 1970s and especially the era of Hannah/Francis (did Russ Francis 
    ever pancake _anyone_?).
    
    McGuire did seem particularly full of himself yesterday with those
    references to his terrific eyesight.  Didn't he also get into some 
    kind of on-air pissing contest with OJ a couple years back, where 
    they had to do the Dan Rather curtain-drop thing on him before he
    set himself ablaze?  Add him to the list of suspects...
    
    glenn
     
56.1908those where some major tusslesAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsTue Sep 19 1995 11:169
    
    
    
    
      Well maybe not to the extreme but I'm not the only one that thinks
    McGuire is a dope.  As far as Francis ever pancake anyone ask Phil
    Villipiano (sp).
    
    Jerry
56.1909CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Sep 19 1995 13:037
All the guys on Imus said that McGuire has a drinking problem.

Now, it's probably not true (more than likely, anyway) but if you listened
to him with that in mind, it almost sounded credible....


'Saw
56.1910Like F. Lee Bailey-- shut up and have another martini, FEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Sep 19 1995 13:068
> Now, it's probably not true (more than likely, anyway) but if you listened
> to him with that in mind, it almost sounded credible....
    
    He may not, but he's one of those guys who looks like he does...
    
    glenn
    
56.1911My poor attempt at the Cardinal....CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Sep 19 1995 13:2619
>    He may not, but he's one of those guys who looks like he does...
    

Sure 'n his name be McGuire now too.  Makes a body wonder if he's been
blowin' the foam off bedpans too.

Which doesn't belong and why, Glenn in the morn'?

		a) Paul McGuire
		b) OJ Simpson
		c) Mike Leary


Sure'n the answer's c - Mike Leary.  Why?  Because Mike Leary doesn't wear
extra large Isotoner gloves when he's harvestin' potatoes....


Now for the daily lotto numbers.....    

56.1912Atlanta could make or beak Pats' seasonTNPUBS::NAZZAROI'll make a good Gordon, GordonTue Sep 19 1995 15:049
    I wouldn't say Atlanta is a definite win for the Pats.  I will say that
    it's a game that could determine the rest of their season, since they
    have Denver and Kansas City after Atlanta, and I'd expect no better
    than a split of those two game.  In Atlanta, the Falcons will be tough,
    especially given the kind of offense they play.  A loss to Atlanta
    would mean 1-3 going into Denver and KC, and only another seven game
    win streak would get them into the playoffs.
    
    NAZZ
56.1913In McNamara's bandAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsTue Sep 19 1995 15:569
    
    
    
     Yea I know McGuire is a booze hound.  A friend of mine was at a
    reception the Sat. before opening day and McGuire came up to his
    friend and asked if his pants where 42's or something.  My buddy
    said the dude was stewed to the gills.
    
    Jerry
56.1914DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Tue Sep 19 1995 16:0110
    
      McGuire had a bypass or some heart procedure not too long ago.
     He was told he had to give up a few things. He said he'd give
     up anything but Budweiser. The guy who really annoyed me during
     a Pats telecast was Collinsworth during the Miami game. He made
     it sound like NE didn't even belong on the same field as Miami
     when the truth was that as bad as the Pats played they were still 
     in it right up to the middle of the fourth. Cris seems to go out
     of his way to say something bold just to set himself apart from 
     the pack and too often he just comes off as asinine and abrasive.
56.1915CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Sep 19 1995 16:335
Overall I've noticed these tendencies with color commentators (excepting
perhaps John Madden) to pander to the team that's ahead and trash the team
that's behind.

Maybe it's just me, I dunno....
56.1916CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Sep 19 1995 17:039
    
    Paul Maguire imo is one of the best. He calls it like he see it, he
    apologizes when he makes a mistakes and he lets the other's make fun of him.
    What more can a guy do? To listen to Enberg and some of these other
    louts you'd think they never made a mistake in their life. It was
    a sorry day when they broke up Albert and Maguire cause they were
    right up ther with Summerall and Madden for overall entertainment.
    
    mike
56.1917DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Tue Sep 19 1995 17:414
    
        Mike Childs, you were right about Pittesburg having a say as
       to who the best team in the AFC is. Last night they said, "It
       ain't us."
56.1918Not that this was the only problem...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Sep 19 1995 17:4811
>       Mike Childs, you were right about Pittesburg having a say as
>       to who the best team in the AFC is. Last night they said, "It
>       ain't us."
    
    No kidding.  And once again Mike Tomczak proved that his hands
    are too small to handle the regulation NFL football, and he has
    no business as a starting QB in this league...
    
    glenn
    
56.1919Hootie > TomczakHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIITue Sep 19 1995 17:507
Y'all missed it.

The Fish won cause Hootie and the Blowfish sang the National Anthem and
Dan Marino, along with a cast of many including Zo, are in one of their
videos.

TTom
56.1920CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Sep 19 1995 18:069
    
    They're just settin' Miami up for the end of the year. Besides Miami
    usually starts the year off hot and sucks pondwater when it counts.
    
    I'm just glad you torment on an equal basis Tommy, otherwise I'd
    take it personally! Afterall I'm still deeply disturb and seeing
    a shrink over the Donny Osmond expose!!!!!111
    
    ;^)
56.1921CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Sep 19 1995 18:314
I think after the injuries on Opening Day, Pittsburgh gave up claim to
being the main competition for the Dolphins.  At least for now....

That's the way I look at it....
56.1922not so fast, yetHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIITue Sep 19 1995 18:3813
I wouldn't count the Steelhaids out, at least not now.

They're sitting pretty comfortable at 2-1. That puts 'em behind only KC
and the Fish.

They lost with their scrub QB so better days may be ahead. Compared to
some other pretenders like Cleveland, they've looked better against
common opponents such as Houston which Pittsburgh whooped and the might
Browns barely beat.

They're all just playing for the right to lose in the SuperBowl anyway.

TTom
56.1923DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Tue Sep 19 1995 19:357
    
      The Steelers had the same problem the Pats had the last two
     weeks. A solid defense, in Pittsburg's case perhaps a great
     one, and no offense. Ya just can't win that way. I'd like 
     to see if that Miller kid pans out for the Steelers though.
     Because Pittsburg with even an average offense is a solid 
     match for Miami.
56.1924Drew Bledsoe == Tony Eason ???MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Sep 28 1995 19:1713
   There's a piece in ESPN-net by Chris Mortesen about Drew Blesoe's
  courage or lack thereof. According to Mortensen, Big Tuna was none 
  too thrilled about the way Bledsoe reacted to the hit. Where Tuna
  wanted Bledsoe to suck it up and show some grit and leadership in-
  stead Drew cradled his arm on the sidelines and shied away from the
  pass rush on the field. Also supposedly some of th 49ers asked their
  defensive coordinator, Pete Carroll, to call off the dogs and not
  blitz and potentially hurt Bledsoe. Something they wouldn't have
  done if they didn't see fear in Drew's eyes. Word is that because
  of the way Bledsoe and his agent have handled this whole incident,
  Drew will not start until Parcells is convinced he's "100% healthy".
    
56.1925Maybe he was griamcing because the shoulder was truly busted?EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Sep 28 1995 19:2212
>                      -< Drew Bledsoe == Tony Eason  ??? >-
    
    I heard this criticism right away, but then yesterday I read that
    Bledsoe has a third-degree separation, the worst possible.  What's
    the real story here?  If Bledsoe indeed has that serious a separation,
    then the real stupidity truly was with Parcells for leaving him in
    there late in the game for no other reason than to prove a point in 
    a lost cause...
    
    glenn
    
56.1926Parcells really needs to actually DO somethingAKOCOA::BREENThu Sep 28 1995 20:488
    Parcells blew it big time and knows it by now.  Bill Parcells hasn't
    done anything or proven anything since he's been here.  I still have
    hope that he knows what he's been doing, I also have doubt.  The fact
    is he squeaked into the playoffs (factual accomplishment - very lucky
    of course since it needed 6 or 7 in a row).
    
    I also see a lot of his key players as holdovers (eg the
    line,Hurst,Brown) and his replacements hardly an improvement.
56.1927MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Sep 28 1995 21:0123
    >> -< Maybe he was griamcing because the shoulder was truly busted? >-


       That would certainly explain why Parcells, who is usually pretty
       heavy handed with the press, backed down from Channel 5's Ed Harding
       when Harding pressed him on leaving Bledsoe in and offered to show 
       him video tape of Drew grimacing on the sidelines. When I saw that
       I thought that either Big Tuna screwed up bad or Bledsoe punked
       out.

    >> I heard this criticism right away, but then yesterday I read that
    >> Bledsoe has a third-degree separation, the worst possible.  What's
    >> the real story here?  

       It's some doctor that his agent referred Drew to that said that
       Drew had a 3rd degree separation. The Pats really haven't said
       anything about it. BTW - the way Drew's agent Steinberg handled
       this can't sit to well with BT. To say that he feels it best that
       Drew rest his shoulder, etc. etc. I'd think BT would like more
       input on that.
    
    
56.1928CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Sep 29 1995 11:3115
All shoulder separations are painful.  They were pretty common stock of all the
serious injuries sustained on our rugby club.  A couple of guys I know had what
they've termed a 3rd degree separation.  Even "strapped in" they said it was
painful, and that it was a bitch to try and sleep even.

I saw Drew's hit and thought shoulder separation right away.  I don't know how
bad it was, but clearly he was in pain.

I'm surprised that they wanted him back in there, considering he's their future
and all of that.  

I think Parcells blew this one -- unless he had absolutely no faith in Zolak.


'Saw
56.1929Drew got second opinionSNAX::ERICKSONRed Sox - 1995 AL East ChampsFri Sep 29 1995 11:5919
    
    	What you have here is the tale of too tails. When the game was
    in progress. Drew was examined by the Patriots doctor. At that point
    in time, it was deemed a minor shoulder seperation. Which would
    translate into a 1st degree seperation.
    	Once the game was over and Drew was re-examined by the Patriots
    doctor. They discovered that indeed it was worse then first thought.
    The problem I have with the Patriots. Is that they did not take an
    x-ray of Drew's shoulder. During half time of the 49'ers game. They
    waited and took the x-ray the next day. The x-ray told them how bad
    the shoulder was. If they took the x-ray at the game. They would have
    know and pulled Drew from the game.
    	Drew's agent got involved for this reason. They didn't take an
    x-ray right away. Then you had the same doctor (Patriots) tell you
    something different, after the x-ray. Thus, Drew flew to Alabama to
    see the specialist. To have him look at the x-rays. Drew just got a
    second opinion. Which is just being smart.
    
    Ron
56.1930seen itHBAHBA::HAASarpecay iemdayFri Sep 29 1995 12:488
>All shoulder separations are painful.  

Lasted night in the Md-Ga Tech game, a player separated his shoulder and
the "reset" it on the field.

I'm sure Drew can get a clip of it from ESPN.

TTom
56.1931CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Sep 29 1995 12:5213
>>All shoulder separations are painful.  
>
>Lasted night in the Md-Ga Tech game, a player separated his shoulder and
>the "reset" it on the field.
>
>I'm sure Drew can get a clip of it from ESPN.

Was it a separation or a dislocation?  Dislocations can be reset.
Separations are basically things that have to "heal" back....  it's a different
set of bones and ligaments and stuff....


'Saw
56.1932SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIFri Sep 29 1995 13:0319
RE                      <<< Note 56.1926 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    Parcells blew it big time and knows it by now.  Bill Parcells hasn't
>    done anything or proven anything since he's been here.  I still have
>    hope that he knows what he's been doing, I also have doubt.  The fact
>    is he squeaked into the playoffs (factual accomplishment - very lucky
>    of course since it needed 6 or 7 in a row).
    
  I disagree with this. When Parcells took over the Patriots they were a club
in shambles able to only win a handful of games per year. In just a couple
seasons he got them to the playoffs. 

  Even if he did make a mistake that doesn't mean all that much and in this
case he seems to have been acting on bad information from the team doctor.

  I feel good about Parcells. The Patriots should always be a contender or
moving toward being a contender if he's around.

  George
56.1933that's gotta hurt!HBAHBA::HAASarpecay iemdayFri Sep 29 1995 14:168
They called it a separation.

The thing that comes to mind is Lethal Weapon II where Mel Gibson had
this thing his character could do to dislocate/separate his shoulder so
he could get outta straight jackets. He would grimace fairly
significantly when he did this.

TTom
56.1934CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Sep 29 1995 14:5328
It's been a while, and I could be a bit mixed up, and I don't have my
Gray's here with me, but it sounds as if some sportscaster was mis-using a 
word (such as they always do with the term scrum)


A dislocation is where the ball end of the humerus (the upper bone in the arm)
actually comes out of the socket joint that is the shoulder.  This is extremely
painful, and under some circumstances can be "reduced" on the spot.  However,
as an EMT we were told to just transport and let an ortho guy take care of
that.

Multiple dislocations over time will weaken the shoulder joint, and make
dislocation easier (although no less painful I'm sure).  Harry Houdini was able
to do some of his escapes from straight jackets by dislocating his shoulder and 
creating enough slack in the jacket.  This was alluded to, if I remember
correctly, in Lethal Weapon.


Separation, I believe, is an actual separation of some of the other bones that
make up the socket area of the shoulder joint (basically the clavicle and 
something else).  The ends of these bones are not fused, but held together
with ligaments (I think -- I'd have to check to be sure) and a good "pop"
on the shoulder like Drew took (or Aikman last year or two seasons ago it was)
will slightly separate those bones.


I might be a bit off, but that's the general nature of the problem as I
understand it....
56.1935OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Sep 29 1995 15:161
56.1936SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIFri Sep 29 1995 15:173
  No, the other side.

  George
56.1937still hurtsHBAHBA::HAASarpecay iemdayFri Sep 29 1995 15:326
Which prevents the ol' followthrough.

Also, from the sounds of it, he may be "favoring" it a bit which means
he'll be tossing sooner and shorter.

TTom
56.1938MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceFri Sep 29 1995 15:4712
    
           The bad part is that it all could have been avoided
          if Drew had either the good sense to get rid of the ball
          fast or the agility to sidestep Norton. Norton came right 
          up the middle, Bledsoe had to have seen him coming but
          Drew did nothing to avoid taking the sack. The vast majority
          of Bledsoe's sacks have been avoidable. He locks on to receivers
          and never sees the hit coming from the blindside. The ab-
          ility to 'feel' the rush seems to be innate and as Drew doesn't 
          have it, he may be prone to getting the stuffing whacked out of
          him for the rest of his career.
    
56.1939MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Fri Sep 29 1995 18:546
	Bledsoe does seem to get more hits that he should have
	been able to avoid.  The up side of this is that he
	doesn't have "happy feet".  (At least not yet)


	billl
56.1940 ROCK THE HOUSESUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERFri Sep 29 1995 19:387
    
    	Bledsoe is washed up!  There is no way he will make it in this 
    	league for another 2 years.  He better start polishing those
    	pumps!
    
    	WOOF!
    
56.1941SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIFri Sep 29 1995 19:536
  Washed up?

  That makes no sense. He's had success in the past, what makes you think he
can't play when he comes back from his injury?

  George
56.1942ROCK THE HOUSE...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Sep 29 1995 21:445
    
    	He'd have worn a dress for too long!
    
    WOOF!
    
56.1943WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Sep 29 1995 23:456
    
    Well, I'll take the heat for this - I'm psyched for Zolak.  I hope he
    tears 'em up out there in Atlanta.  Always enjoy the meat and 'taters
    qb's (Steve Grogan, Joe Ferguson, John Elway) over the finesse qb's
    (Bledsoe, Marino, Montana).  Hope Zolak butts a few heads.
    
56.1944YUK!PCBUOA::EHSMon Oct 09 1995 13:173
    
    
    YUK!
56.1945CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Oct 09 1995 13:2411
Not good.....


And what was with that db from Denver.  Everytime he made a play he started
jumping around like someone put Atomic Balm in his jockstrap.  What's with
that?  So the guy made play -- okay, go back and make another one....

I began to wonder if perhaps he had some sort of nerve affliction, like
what they used to call St. Vidas Dance.....   

Is he okay physically?
56.1946yes I know, the LA Browns got hammered in DetroitROCK::GRONOWSKIYear 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996Mon Oct 09 1995 13:313
56.1947CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Oct 09 1995 13:3713
No, I don't think he has.

Something wasn't right with him last night.  He was throwing very poorly.
They kept speculating that the tape job wasn't right and it hampered his
left arm.

Personally, I was thinking that they should have shot the shoulder up.
He might have thrown better.

He was throwing almost as poorly as Dave Brown does......


'Saw
56.1948OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Oct 09 1995 15:261
56.1949Tuna may be a good coach but he's a terrible GMAD::HEATHTribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sportsMon Oct 09 1995 15:5933
    
    
    
    
        Bledsoe should not have played.  As it was he didn't help the team
    and only made himself look bad.  I could only stomach the first half
    but it appears that the Pathetictriots are back.  This team has shown 
    absolutely no heart the last 2 games.  The Tuna's draft picks and FA
    have been a total bust.  (Guess we know now who made the Giants a
    winner).  
    
      Guyton      I thought he was a big hitter?
      Kratch      What gives with this guy, can he move anyone?
      Dallenbach  Smerlas was right.
      McGinist    A little to early to tell but can you say Singelton?
      White       Proved why he was a back up.
      Megget      Yea he's worth 2.5 mill.
      
    For two weeks the Tuna has been preachin about making changes.  If
    something don't give next week they'll be just playing out the string.
    I just hope some of these idiots in the press will just ask him some
    tough questions.  He has had a free ride for the 3 years he has been
    here and until this year made progress.  This year they have gone back
    a few years.  Let Goad go for White, this just proves bigger ain't
    better.  Let Turner go, who has stepped it up in the backfield NOBODY.
    The entire offensive line has been terrible.  I never seem so many DL
    in the backfield in my life.  The 100% new and improved DL proved why
    they where backups on their old teams.  If they lost and showed they at
    least had a heartbeat it wouldn't be so bad.  But they look lifeless.
    There isn't one leader on that whole team.  
    
    Jerry 
    
56.1950SmellyBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredMon Oct 09 1995 18:387

	Quote from the 'ol Tunameister in our paper today.  "We stink.  We're
	worse than I can describe to you."  At least when he coached at the
	AFA he had an excuse.

	Kevin
56.1951SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 09 1995 18:5112
  So what happened? Granted they started with three pretty tough teams and
Bledsoe's not been himself since, but they seem to have no running game at all.

  Did they lose some personal from last year that they were unable to replace
or do they have talent playing way below what they look like on paper?

  See last year all of us in the SPORTS notes file were watching from the start
so we sorted out all the Patriots problems. This year all our attention is going
to baseball, we take our minds off football, and look what happens.

  Shows to go yuh,
  George
56.1952OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Oct 09 1995 19:092
56.1953SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 09 1995 19:105
  But last year they didn't look this bad.

  What happened?

  George
56.1954OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Oct 09 1995 19:111
56.1955what a waste of time!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Oct 10 1995 14:168
	I'll never make the pilgrimage to Foxboro for another night 
	game!...I'm glad I had Monday off.  We didn't get home until
	1am.  And that was after leaving the stadium in the third.



	billl

56.1956just stirrin the pot...BSS::MENDEZTue Oct 10 1995 20:016
    I got a question for Mike Childs and Frank Way...
    
    who is worse as head coach?
    a.)Dan Reeves
    b.)Bill Parcells
    
56.1957OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Oct 10 1995 20:341
56.1958CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Oct 11 1995 10:5814
    
    Not even close. While Parcells isn't the best gameday coach in the
    land or talent evaluator out there, he is a motivator and a coach
    players put out for. Not sure what the problem is this year. I'd like
    to blame it on ego and say Bledsoe has gotten bigger than coach but
    he dealt with LT in NY so it can't be that. Maybe because LT had a
    heart and Bledsoe doesn't?
    
    Reeves flat out sucks! He can't motivate players, can't adapt during
    a game, can't judge talent, without a doubt the most over-rated bum
    walking the sidelines. The only coach worst than Reeves is Switzer
    but he won't be exposed because of the brillance of Emitt and the OL.
    
    mike
56.1959CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Oct 11 1995 12:1018
What Mike said.

I couldn't agree more.

In fact, I've seen a few p-names that say "Parcells must go."  Well, I'll tell
you what, I'll give you Dan Reeves and Herschel Walker and throw in George
Young for Bill Parcells.  Fair deal?  You can have all three of them.

One of the biggest problems I see with the Pats this year, and I have to admit
that I don't follow them as closely as the Giants, but what I see is Pat Harlow
being absent.  I think they truly miss him, and the running game is sucking
as a result.  JMHO.


But, I'd take Parcells back in a heartbeat.


'Saw
56.1960EDWIN::WAUGAMANStill just a rat in a cageWed Oct 11 1995 12:539
> But, I'd take Parcells back in a heartbeat.
    
    That's fine, just don't let him be the GM.  Many of these personnel
    decisions are looking dumber by the day...
    
    
    glenn
    
56.1961CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Oct 11 1995 12:557
    
    Parcells' problem is that he's no GM and he's hurt himself there and
    has tried to justify his mistakes by playing his people. If he'd just
    get back to coaching he'd be fine.
    
    Just give Dan Reeves a last place schedule and he'll be fine. Raise the
    bar a little expect disappointment..........
56.1962CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Oct 11 1995 12:5611
>    
>    That's fine, just don't let him be the GM.  Many of these personnel
>    decisions are looking dumber by the day...
>    
    
I'll agree with you there.

I'd like him just to coach.

Course we still need to get rid of George Young....    

56.1963exMSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Oct 11 1995 13:1222
  >> One of the biggest problems I see with the Pats this year, and 
  >> I have to admit that I don't follow them as closely as the Giants, 
  >> but what I see is Pat Harlow being absent.  


     The Pats miss Harlow but his absence is a relatively small part of 
     the problem. The biggest problem is that virtually none of Parcells'
     free agent acquisitions have panned out especially the d-line that 
     he brought in. Those bigger d-linemen are showing us why they were 
     second stringers on their old teams. The next one of them that gets 
     into the opposing backfield will be the first. This d-line may not 
     get pushed around but I don't think stationary is an improvement over
     last year. Another problem is that Parcells shipped out 200 recep-
     tions from last year. Thompson, Turner,  and Timpson had close to
     that many last year and they ain't here no more. It was thought that
     Meggett and some free agents would make up for that but it ain't happ-
     ening. Lastly, all the talk about appreciating Drew Bledsoe's great-
     ness as it unfold has proven to be awfully premature. This kid has a
     long long way to go before he's going to lead a team anywhere. Not
     physicallty but mentally. And, imo, I'm not so sure, and never really
     have been, that he has the head for it. 
56.1964CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Oct 11 1995 13:1845
>     The Pats miss Harlow but his absence is a relatively small part of 
>     the problem. The biggest problem is that virtually none of Parcells'

Okay, I'll give you that because you watch them more than I do.  It seems that
everytime I do see them, Harlow's replacement is screwing up.


>     free agent acquisitions have panned out especially the d-line that 
>     he brought in. Those bigger d-linemen are showing us why they were 
>     second stringers on their old teams. The next one of them that gets 
>     into the opposing backfield will be the first. This d-line may not 
>     get pushed around but I don't think stationary is an improvement over
>     last year. 


Isn't one of the linebackers injured also?  You can almost accept a line
that isn't penetrating if you can get an LB in there.  That was the case 
*some* of the time in NY, although Marshall and (earlier) Martin did penetrate
and awful lot in addition to Taylor and Banks.



>     Another problem is that Parcells shipped out 200 recep-
>     tions from last year. Thompson, Turner,  and Timpson had close to
>     that many last year and they ain't here no more. It was thought that
>     Meggett and some free agents would make up for that but it ain't happ-
>     ening. 

Big problem, agreed.  


>     Lastly, all the talk about appreciating Drew Bledsoe's great-
>     ness as it unfold has proven to be awfully premature. This kid has a
>     long long way to go before he's going to lead a team anywhere. Not
>     physicallty but mentally. And, imo, I'm not so sure, and never really
>     have been, that he has the head for it. 

Similar to the situation in New YOrk with Brown, except that Bledsoe, until the
injury, doesn't throw ruptured duck passes.   Both have shown an amazing
ability to make amazingly STUPID decisions.   I guess I'm chalking it up to 
the dumbing down of America  8^)


'Saw

56.1965Mac deserved betterAKOCOA::BREENOnions, Tortellini and ThouWed Oct 11 1995 14:4516
    I haven't seen most of the carnage this year, I did see some exhibition
    activity and was completely fooled: I thought Parcell's problem was
    HIDING how good this team really was.
    
    Parcell has shown a lot of nepotism in his GM side, ex Giants both
    players and coaches at premium prices, those with no connections let go
    for $money and quickly picked up (Goad,Turner).  Somebody mentioned
    Singleton - he's playing for Miami isn't he?
    
    It isn't that I've been truly suspect about Parcells all along, just
    tried to be objective and one objective observation was that the key
    people were pre-parcells except Bledsoe who was a free #1 courtesy of
    the MacPherson '92 horror show.  Except I'm not convinced that Parcells
    is better than MacPherson - I haven't been shown that.
    
    billte
56.1966SNAX::ERICKSONParcells must go...Wed Oct 11 1995 20:379
    
    Saw,
    
    	I'd take Reeves, Walker, and Young for Parcells. Parcells is not
    GM material and doesn't no how to manage money. The Patriots have the
    3rd highest payroll in football. Parcell's is paying stiffs a million
    a year.
    
    Ron
56.1967USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Oct 12 1995 18:4812
>          <<< Note 56.1966 by SNAX::ERICKSON "Parcells must go..." >>>

That p-name came around quicker than I thought.  I don't expect the
press to lead that chant...at least not until next year when they're
again 1-4 (or the like).

Bill Parcells is probably a better motivator & disciplinarian than
he is a football strategist.  He had some great talent on those
Giants teams and used smash-mouth football to win.  He doesn't have
that talent with this team, and what talent he does have can't play
smash-mouth football.  We may be seeing that Parcells doesn't know
any other way to play the game.
56.1968didn't expect it to only take 5 games!ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 18:5326
56.1969MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 12 1995 20:047
>    Write us in December and tell us what its like to watch Miami and 
>    Cleveland playing in the playoffs knowing New England didn't make it !!
>    Don't forget to order a little salt to put on your crow !!
    
     Cleveland is no lock to make the playoffs.  Only one AFC central team
     will go, and Cleveland doesn't appear to be head and shoulders above the
     others in football's most pathetic division.
56.1970CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Oct 13 1995 12:1513
I think Parcells comes from the Lombardi school of football.  Everyone knows
what you're going to do, but you just out-execute them.

His preferred style works well in the northeast, no doubt.   He was capable of
changing styles -- his air attack last year was a surprise to a lot of Giants
fans.  

I think he falls a bit short on the GM side -- perhaps that is his "Peter
Principle".  But as a coach, I'd take him in a nanosecond over what we've
got now.....


'Saw
56.1971Sit his butt down for a few gamesMSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Oct 16 1995 18:2411
    
       Yet again during yesterday's Pats game an opposing d-lineman
      jumped offsides, the flag flew but yet again Drew didn't take 
      advantage of it. Instead, he intentionally threw the ball away 
      out of bounds. I count five times this season that he's not taken
      advantage of the d-linemen jumping offsides. Then the critical
      QB sneak on fourth down when we needed a foot might have been
      as poor an execution of that play as I've ever seen. The whole
      KC line would have had to take three steps backward for that
      play to be effective the way Bledsoe went about it. 
    
56.1972free playHBAHBA::HAASconched outMon Oct 16 1995 18:2816
>       Yet again during yesterday's Pats game an opposing d-lineman
>      jumped offsides, the flag flew but yet again Drew didn't take 
>      advantage of it. Instead, he intentionally threw the ball away 
>      out of bounds. 

I commented on this to a friend who tried to justify this as just
throwing it away. Evidently he learnt his football from the same place as
Bledsoe.

Drew, buddy, it's a free play. Throw it anywhere, just keep it in play.
You got nothing to lose so at least try to make something of it.

Right now, if'n you're rating thised year's major underachievers, Drew,
Ricky Watters and Andre Rison would have to be at the top of the list.

TTom
56.1973SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 16 1995 18:377
  When Bledsoe was drafted, didn't the decision come down to him and another
quarterback who ended up being one of the 1st few choices?

  If so, who was that, where he is, and how's he doing? In other words, did
Parcells take the wrong guy?

  George
56.1974he's a playerUSCTR1::GARBARINOMon Oct 16 1995 18:4614
>Right now, if'n you're rating thised year's major underachievers, Drew,
>Ricky Watters and Andre Rison would have to be at the top of the list.

You're right on 2 of the 3, but you better check Watter's #s again TTom.
Before yesterday's 122 rushing yards, he was #2 in the entire NFL in
yards from scrimage (500 rushing, 247 receiving).  His TDs aren't what
they were at SF (Philly has had an awful time scoring), but he's really
doing what he did for the '9ers.

Ricky Watters is a very popular whipping boy because of his emotional,
flamboyant nature, NOT because he can't play.  He's a very talented
back, arguably the best multi-talent RB in the league.

He seems to suffer from the same public ignorance that plagues Deion.
56.1975like Meatloaf, 2 outta 3 aint badHBAHBA::HAASconched outMon Oct 16 1995 18:5510
You're right, Joe.

I was really looking through them Fantasy Football League glasses,
dontcha know.

It's a little personal with Rison since I traded in the off season for 
him. Some deal, there, huh ;-(.

TTom

56.1976Dilfer?HBAHBA::HAASconched outMon Oct 16 1995 18:576
re: .1973

Wasn't the other guy Trent Dilfer who looks like he may be coming into
his own along with the Division leading Tampa Bay Bucs.

TTom
56.1977Get off'n Bledsoe will ya???WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityMon Oct 16 1995 18:583
    
    
        Nope it was Rick Mirer. And no the Pats made the right decision!
56.1978SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 16 1995 19:009
  Maybe, I seem to remember something about how Seattle had the 2nd pick
and the fans would have liked it if the Seahawks had taken Bledsoe because
he played college ball in Washington but Parcells took him and they had to
settle for someone else. Then they either took the other quarterback or
took someone else entirely when they couldn't get Bledsoe, I forget.

  That sound familiar or have I been reading the Boston Globe too much?

  George
56.1979The real scoop...BSS::MENDEZMon Oct 16 1995 20:068
    Lets put Ricky Watters stats in perspective.  I was watching the
    9ers lose yet another game they could have won with a decent kicker.
    Anyway the new 9er back has virtually identical numbers to Watters
    of last year with more touchdowns.  I think Loville has 4 - 5
    touchdowns.  Yet the emotion is missing from the 9er offense and
    that was partially provided from Ricky Watters...  I think emotion is
    what the 9ers miss most from Watters.
    
56.1980Gotta go for dazone when it b freeAD::HEATHTribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sportsTue Oct 17 1995 10:1715
    
    
      re quite a few back...
    
       About Bledsoe and the free play.....Phil Simms and McDopey where
    talking about it after it happened.  McDopey seemed to think it was
    a good play ie "he knew it wasn't going to count just through it
    away" and Simms saying something like "he's got a free play gotta go
    for the endzone and try for a big play if it gets picked off it don't
    count", I and most people agree with Simms.  Its free take a shot and
    see what happens, a big play TD in that situation turns the game
    around.  McDopey tried to justify what he said in his stupor but it
    just didn't matter.  
    
    Jerry
56.1981SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Oct 17 1995 10:5820
  I'm confused about this "free play". As I understand, the "free play"
happens when the QB notices a defensive lineman jump off sides. It's a
free play because there should be a flag on the play against the defense
and if some disaster happens they can always take the penalty and nullify
the play.

  Is that right?

  If so, here's my question. What if the QB takes the "free play", disaster
happens, but in the opinion of the referee the defensive player was drawn
off side. The ref is wrong, the defensive player who is right in front of
the QB didn't move, but the ref is convinced he did and that he drew the
defensive lineman off sides.

  In that case, what happens to the "free play"?

  What are fans likely to say the next day about the QB for taking the "free
play"? 

  George 
56.1982I'm not Jerry Markbreit, but....CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Oct 17 1995 11:3531
>
>  If so, here's my question. What if the QB takes the "free play", disaster
>happens, but in the opinion of the referee the defensive player was drawn
>off side. The ref is wrong, the defensive player who is right in front of
>the QB didn't move, but the ref is convinced he did and that he drew the
>defensive lineman off sides.
>

If the lineman is drawn offsides, it's no play because it happened before the
play starts.

I'm not John Hendry but I think it works something like this:


	If the lineman move, or if the QB moves to draw the lineman
	off, it should be flagged (and 99.9% of the time is) and the
	play is dead before the snap.

	If the QB draws the lineman off with a hard count, that's
	fair game.

	If the lineman goes offsides, a flag is thrown but the play
	continues.  If the offense gets a better play than the 5 yards	
	the offsides will net, than they decline, otherwise, no matter
	what disaster might befall (inty, fumble etc) the offense
	can always take the penalty and it nullifies any badness that
	occurred.  Thus a "free" play.


'Saw

56.1983CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Oct 17 1995 11:3611
>	If the lineman move, or if the QB moves to draw the lineman
>	off, it should be flagged (and 99.9% of the time is) and the
>	play is dead before the snap.
>

Should read if the o-lineman move


'Saw


56.1984MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Oct 17 1995 11:5618
    
      re .1981
    
       If it's the offense that's offsides then the play is dead.
       Your question is moot, George. When that flag goes up be-
       cause someone jumped, it's a *no lose* situation for the
       QB.
    
       And to answer your previous question, no Parcells didn't
       pick the wrong QB. He picked the wrong offensive coord-
       inator and he should have hired a QB coach. Last year,
       Drew got by being a thrower. This year he has to be more
       of a quarterback and he's struggling badly. Fire Perkins,
       hire an offensive coordinator that will take advantage
       of Bledsoe's strengths and hire a Grogan or Simms to
       teach the kid how to really play the position. Otherwise, 
       start Zolak. At least he can avoid the rush and improvise
       because Drew is getting himself killed.
56.1985SNAX::ERICKSONAnybody but Cleveland...Tue Oct 17 1995 12:2911
    
    	As people have said if the O-Line moved, or drew the D-line
    offsides. The ref will throw the flag and blow the whistle. Its
    done to protect the QB. If the whistle is not blown. Then it is on
    the Defense. You might has well go for a big play.
    	The Patriots had 2 occasions. On the first one Drew had plenty of
    time to throw the ball. He should have thrown it deep. On the
    second one, he was being chased by 3 guys. Throw it away so you don't
    take the hit.
    
    Ron
56.1986AKOCOA::BREENOnions, Tortellini and ThouTue Oct 17 1995 14:338
    Well one time Bledsoe did continue with the "free" play and connected
    and the refs brought it back and gave the Pats only 5 coming up with
    some beauty about the defensive lineman having a clear shot at the qb
    when in reality the defensive man that moved early was retreating back
    to the line.
    
    Official calls seem to be going against the Patriots this year whereas
    last year they got the benefit.
56.1987Where have all the #11 Gameshirts gone???CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Oct 19 1995 18:371
    
56.1988CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Oct 20 1995 11:5712
>                 -< Where have all the #11 Gameshirts gone??? >-

They retired them in a ceremony on Opening Night.


Oh, wait a minute, you're not talking about THAT #11.....


Sorry.

    

56.1989Pats trounce Bills 27-14TNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasWed Oct 25 1995 12:405
    Terrific game by the Pats Monday night and not a word about it in here?
    
    Oh, it's so easy to criticize, but try to say something nice....
    
    NAZZ
56.1990CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Oct 25 1995 12:549
>    Terrific game by the Pats Monday night and not a word about it in here?
>    
>    Oh, it's so easy to criticize, but try to say something nice....
    
Hell of a victory -- from what I heard on the radio, they were firing on all
cynlinders, their RB netted over 100 yards, and Bledsoe was accurate and
intelligent.....

Didn't have a chance to say anything yesterday....
56.1991IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Wed Oct 25 1995 13:119
I'll criticize...  (just a little because I was generally pleased)

The score could/should have been bigger.  Buffalo had a *lot* of turnovers,
giving the Pats tremendous field position, and a most of the time they didn't
convert to the degree that they could have.

They really dominated the game, but Buffalo had a chance to pull it out for
a lot longer time than they should have.
56.1992MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Oct 25 1995 13:2220
  >> Terrific game by the Pats Monday night and not a word about it in here?
    
  >> Oh, it's so easy to criticize, but try to say something nice....
    
     Yeah, It's real easy to criticize especially when you're 1-5 and your 
     $42 million QB looks like the second coming of Hugh Millen but here's
     something nice... We were lucky Thurman Thomas got hurt because before 
     he did, he looked like he was going to run hog wild on us. It was 'nice'
     that he went out with a pulled hamstring and never returned. And it was 
     nice that his replacement, Holmes, carried the ball like it was greased. 
     And it was nice that Andre Reed was out because even possession receiver 
     Billy Brooks managed to look like Bullet Bob Hayes against the Pats se-
     condary. And here's something else nice, Sam Gash. Why the hell haven't 
     they been throwing more to Sam Gash all along? The guy can obviously 
     catch the ball and then punish defenders afterward. And especially
     nice was Kevin Lee. Too bad we have to be on the brink of elimination
     before the Patsies brain trust gives the kid some serious playing time.
    
     Have a 'nice' day but let's keep last week in perspective. 
56.1993MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 25 1995 13:235
	I'll criticize, too.

	If the Pats are going to have an off season, why play well on the
	one time I pick against them in the KOH contest ?  (BTW, congrats
	Tommy on the fine picks you made this year.)
56.1994GIAMEM::HOVEYWed Oct 25 1995 13:4013
    
    re-.1992
    
    You hit the nail on the head...exactly! Thomas, 4 carries, 42 yards, 2
    receptions, 17 yards in the first quarter....Billy Brooks goes 45
    yards untouched through the secondary...this is not a world class
    sprinter.....
    Dropped passes continue, red zone continues, fumbles.....lucky
    
    Good points....Bledsoe looked a lot better but still threw to many
    possible intercepts....Coates looked good as did Martin...running game
    was ok especially the first half...they only averaged 3.3 ypc, better
    than usual but not that great.....48 carries for 161 yards.
56.1995OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Oct 25 1995 14:032
56.1996key as always is defensive pressure on passerAKOCOA::BREENWed Oct 25 1995 15:148
    Everything went the Pat's way the other night with the single
    consistent strong point being their great pass rush especially McGinest
    and Slade who had great games.
    
    Breaks are part of the game and the Pat's having been getting all bad
    and finally got a bunch of good ones.  Bledsoe's physical improvement
    seemed to carry over to his mental side, the offensive line improved
    but that had a lot to do with being able to balance the attack.
56.1997MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Oct 30 1995 18:3031
    
       Where is the bottom? The Carolina game was about as bad as it 
      gets if you're a Pats fan. Not so much because Carolina is an
      expansion team but just the way it all went down. And no it
      was not at all Bledsoe's fault. You want to place blame? Start
      with the soon to be unemployed punter, Pat O'Neill. Show of
      hands, at this point how many Pats fans would put money on this
      guy against the national finalists in the 12 year old division
      of the PP&K competition? Not me. Move on to the receiving corps
      who range from slow (Will Moore) to no hands (Kevin Lee) to
      the rest of them who are a little of both. Now move on to the
      offensive coordinator, Ray Perkins, who may be the most pred-
      ictable guy since Paul Gronowski. The defense was barely any 
      better. Parcells brought in guys who are mammoth in size but un-
      fortunately also glacial in speed. And the secondary which is the
      second highest paid in football has to be the league's worst dollar 
      for performance deal. These guys tackle like monkeys play the
      piano. The only saving grace would be our linebacking corps if
      Vinny Brown's best years (all three of them) weren't well behind
      him and Chris Slade wasn't so inconsistent. The only thing that
      makes this year bearable is watching how it all plays out with the
      new breed of Pats fans (read: bandwagon jumpers). At the beginning
      of the year demand far exceeded supply for tickets and guys had
      no shortage of customers for tickets at face value. The number of ads
      looking for tickets exceeded the number of folks selling by 5:1.
      But week by week the demand has dwindled to the point where the
      numbers are reversed and guys are starting to take what they can
      get, if they can get it. If we put together another year like this
      one, these sunshine patriots will not only not buy Kraft a new dome
      they might buy him a ticket to Hartford. If Hartford wants him...
    
56.1998SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 13:2911
  Ok so baseball's over. Time to take a peak at what's going on with those guys
who throw the pigskin around. 

  So the Patriots are off to a slow start. Setback no doubt.

  If I'm counting right the Pats have 8 games left, to against the Jets, two
against the Colts, one each against the Dolphins and Bills and two more. Would
that be the Rams and Saints? In any case, who's up next?

  GO Patriots!!!
  George
56.1999MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 01 1995 13:516
    >> So the Patriots are off to a slow start. 

       You really aren't paying attention.
   
    
56.2000SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 13:5516
  Of course not, how can you pay attention to football when baseball is going
on?

  So who's up next? Is this right?

Games to go
    Jets 2
    Colts 2
    Dolphins 1
    Bills 1
    Saints 1
    Rams 1

  George


56.2001A fan tunes in before season 1/2-way doneMIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonWed Nov 01 1995 14:0416
>   Of course not, how can you pay attention to football when baseball is going
> on?

  Or work and watch baseball ?  Or chew gum and walk ?

  I believe the teams are right:  the NY-NJ Jets, the Bal-Ind Colts,
   the Mia Dolphins, the Buf Bills, to NO Saints, the Cle-LA-StL Rams.

  I don't think they play the Oak-LA-Oak Raiders, nor the Bos-Was Redskins,
   nor the Chi-StL-Pho Cardinals; nor the Cle-LA Browns (oops, jumped the gun
   on that one) as the Pats have already won that game.

  But we need to watch out for those Dal-KC Chiefs, LA-SD Chargers, etc., etc.

  In any case, I don't think the Bos-NE Pats are going to the playoffs this
  year George, so you don't have to claim them as a team you are a fan of.
56.2002SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 14:1010
  Oops, looks like I broke another rule and the Fan Fraud Department of the
P.C. Police are on my tail once again.

  So do any of you REAL fans know who the Patriots are playing this week or
not? Hey, at least I'm interested enough to ask. 

  What about it Groner, am I that much less of a Patriots fan than the rest
of these guys because I don't tune in until after baseball?

  George 
56.2003exMSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 01 1995 14:183
     If you really want to know who the Pats are playing buy a newspaper 
    and find out, George.
56.2004SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 14:3111
  Oh KAY, so EXCUUUUUUUUUSE me for trying to chat about the Patriots in the
Patriots note of the SPORTS notes file. Obviously the wrong thing to do. 

  That's two politically incorrect Patriots notes in one day. Dam if you P.C.
cops aren't firing real bullets.

  I love it, not one "football fan" knows who the Patriots are playing this
week and I'm the only one who can come out and admit it. Guess you're right
Groner, these "Patriots fans" are strictly band wagon. 

  George 
56.2006OLD1S::CADZILLA2Just me'n the pygmypony,Yippy tyoWed Nov 01 1995 14:365
    
    George 
    
       They play the Jets at home. Now stop whinning about the abuse your
    getting, you deserve it.
56.2007ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 01 1995 14:367
56.2008SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Wed Nov 01 1995 14:3724
    
    	They are playing Pittsburgh not the Rams. Here is the remaining
    schedule.  They MUST win ALL of there remaining games to make the
    playoffs. Which would make them 7-1 in the AFC East. So if they happend
    to finish in a tie at 10-6 for the division. They should win the AFC
    East, On Tie breakers.
    	For the wildcard they would be 9-3 in conference play. Which would
    put them in the playoffs. Unless they are tied with KC or Denver. They
    lost to both of them. So the tie-breaker would be head-to-head.
    	The only team they could possible lose to is New Orleans and still
    make the playoffs. Anybody else and they need a lot of help.
     
    
    11/5  @Jets
    11/12 @Miami
    11/19 INDY
    11/26 @Buffalo
    12/3  SAINTS
    12/10 JETS
    12/16 @Pittsburgh
    12/23 @INDY
    
    
    Ron
56.2009MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 01 1995 15:0812
    >> They MUST win ALL of there remaining games to make the
    >> playoffs. 
    
       Possible though not likely. Fourth place in the East might not be
       too bad though because I believe it'll mean we'll get the Cowboys
       at home next year. A fifth place schedule would mean the 'Boys on
       the road as well a wimpy overall schedule that might give us the
       illusion of progress with more wins without us actually being any
       better. It's a little scary that at this point anyone would be hard-
       pressed to point to anything on this year's squad and say, "This
       is where we're better than last year or the year before." In several
       areas we are definitely worse.
56.2010Trade Bledsoe for...who? [hypothetically]SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!!Wed Nov 01 1995 15:1030
    Bledsoe may not be a Joe Montana...few quarterbacks are.  But neither
    is he a Vinny Testaverde or Rick Mirer.  Despite the poor season to
    date, I'm still glad we have him.  Salary cap and trading deadlines
    aside, if Cleveland were offered Bledsoe for Testaverde straight up,
    they'd be nuts not to pull the trigger.  Is there ANY QB in the league
    right now that anyone would trade Bledsoe for straight up?  Maybe even
    a Steve Young or Troy Aikman?  What's the age difference? Experience? 
    Future potential?
    
    I think Bledsoe is definitely suffering from a lack of quality
    receivers.  Even Coates is hurting, and without another premier target,
    defenses are all over Coates.  
    
    At some point in his career, I'd like to see Bledsoe benefit from the
    type of quality receivers that Montana had to throw to.  Dwight Clark,
    John Taylor, John Rathman, and of course Jerry Rice can really help a
    QB's stats.  And of course, Montana was surrounded by highly talented
    players at several positions.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting
    that Drew will ever be as good as Montana.  Joe had the leadership
    qualities and knack for winning that a coach dreams about.  But unless
    he has a chance to hook up with some quality receivers, we may never
    know.
    
    The Patriot Jim Plunkett and the Raider Jim Plunkett comes to mind as
    an example.  Free agency these days may tend to radically change over
    the rosters from year to year.  Those teams/coaches that find the right
    mix and [somewhat overused cliche] team chemistry could be the most
    successful.  And, fit that in under the cap.
    
    	Ted
56.2011SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 15:2315
RE  <<< Note 56.2006 by OLD1S::CADZILLA2 "Just me'n the pygmypony,Yippy tyo" >>>

>       They play the Jets at home. Now stop whinning about the abuse your
>    getting, you deserve it.

  Hey, there's an idea. In fact I like it. "P.C. Police abuse". People who feel
you deserve abuse from the P.C. Police because you were not Politically
Correct. Only in the SPORTS notes file. 

  Obviously several people who were very vocal Patriots supporters last year
are a little touchy over the fact that they've pretty much ignored this note
this season. What do you think Groner, could the wheels have fallen off the
Patriots Bandwagon?

  George
56.2012ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 01 1995 15:525
56.2013SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 15:558
  I don't know if you can blame Bledsoe for the team's problems. He doesn't
seen to get much protection, he's got no running game to take the pressure off
and his wide receivers are not exactly candidates for MVP at the pro-bowl. 

  He's young, he makes mistakes, but he looked pretty good when the Pats were
winning their last 7 in a row last year.

  George
56.2014ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 01 1995 16:023
56.2015MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 01 1995 16:027
    >> Is there ANY QB in the league right now that anyone would trade 
    >> Bledsoe for straight up?  Maybe even a Steve Young or Troy Aikman?  

       At this point I'd trade Bledsoe for Aikman, Favre or Jeff Blake.
       That's it. Bledsoe hasn't had the best of seasons and his premature
       coronation as The Next Big Thing makes him an easy target but there's
       plenty of blame to go around.
56.2016ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 01 1995 16:142
56.2017The tremendous talent is still there; we know thatEDWIN::WAUGAMANIf you're traveling back to GeorgiaWed Nov 01 1995 16:1612
    
>       At this point I'd trade Bledsoe for Aikman, Favre or Jeff Blake.
>       That's it. Bledsoe hasn't had the best of seasons and his premature
>       coronation as The Next Big Thing makes him an easy target but there's
>       plenty of blame to go around.
    
    You starting to show Aikman some respect, Tommy? ;-)  I don't know
    about Favre or Blake.  You just can't forget about his age; Bledsoe
    is still a baby in terms of age and college/pro experience.
    
    glenn
    
56.2018BIGQ::MCKAYWed Nov 01 1995 16:176
    I agree with Farve.  Blake not a chance, Mr. Pickens and Scott are
    running under the lofted ball he throws.  not that I'm complaining
    as I'm benefitting in the FFL.  Aikman will be out of football in
    two years and will be on Inside the NFL's where are they now in 4.
    
    Jimbo
56.2019SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Wed Nov 01 1995 16:2312
    
    	Paul wait a couple of years on Zeir. If the Browns go anywhere
    with him in the next 2 years. Zeir will be wanting some serious
    cash. At the moment Drew only accounts for ~11% of the salary cap.
    Which is about 5 million.
    	Its unfortunate the the Pats didn't have stable ownership. The
    year before the cap kicked in. So that they could do what Dallas and
    other teams did. Dallas gave Aikman huge money the year before the
    cap went into effect. So his huge contract doesn't hit the cap as
    much as Bledsoe's does.
    
    Ron
56.2020MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 01 1995 16:3720
    
  >> You starting to show Aikman some respect, Tommy? ;-)  I don't know
  >> about Favre or Blake.  You just can't forget about his age; Bledsoe
  >> is still a baby in terms of age and college/pro experience.
    
     Troy is a solid young QB who at this point is certainly better able to
     lead a team than Drew is and given his age and experience that's as
     it should be. Favre will be a superstar. His TD to INT ratio this
     year is absolutely superb. The talent was always there now he's start-
     ing to add in all the other things that make a great QB. As for Blake,
     I've seen him three times and been very impressed each time. Granted, 
     he plays in the weakest division if football but the kid throws the
     long ball, the short ball, feels the pressure and avoids the rush,
     can scramble, he's a leader, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. As for 
     Drew and his age, he did that same move this past Sunday that irritates 
     me time and time again. A defensive linemen jumps offsides on 3rd down 
     and 7 and Drew throws a four yard pass. At some point, his age will no 
     longer be an excuse. And in terms of game experience he has more than 
     Jeff Blake.
    
56.2021Brent Favre's my main manCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Nov 01 1995 19:118
    
    if it wasn't for his age, I'd consider throwing Bono in there. KC was
    supposed to seriously drop off this year but are sitting at 7-1 thanks
    to Bono. He has brought them back in games they have been trailing and
    he certainly doesn't have an all-star supporting cast. I wouldn't argue
    with any of Tommy's choices either especially Farve......
    
    mike
56.2022SALEM::DODAThe halfway house that Ruth builtWed Nov 01 1995 21:033
They *REALLY* need that megaplex now....

daryll
56.2023SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!!Thu Nov 02 1995 01:0217
    A recent article in SI on Favre suggested his 26-year old body was in
    considerably rough shape.  That is not to say it isn't the norm for NFL
    quarterbacks.  He's put up some sparkling statistics spanning the first
    half of this year and the last half of last year.  I just don't know
    how long he's going to hold together.
    
    In my earlier hypothetical question, I asked if Cleveland would trade
    Vinny for Drew straight up, without salary cap implications.  That
    means if they were out in the park choosing up sides for a game, who
    would they pick first...Drew or Vinny.  Considering some of the names
    mentioned as who folks would be willing to trade, how about Vinny for
    either Favre or Aikman.  I think if you take the emotion out of the
    decision [my hometown's team is better than your's], Vinny comes out
    second-best.  Yes, right now he has better statistics in many
    categories.  He's also on the bench.
    
    		Ted
56.2024ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Nov 02 1995 10:158
56.2025SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!!Thu Nov 02 1995 10:285
    I didn't forget that Vinny has a shot at the playoffs.  I intentionally
    stripped all the other stuff away.  Drew vs. Vinny:  all other things
    being equal - salary, city played for, receivers, offensive line,
    coaches, the whole package.  Leave the baggage out of it.  Do you pick
    Drew or Vinny?
56.2026BIGQ::MCKAYThu Nov 02 1995 11:087
    Drew in an easy decision.
    
    Vinny is the scapegoat for the 4-4 record, he was doing fine.  His
    only shortcoming was to not get Rison the ball.  I love Zeier and
    hope he does well, but Vinny was hosed.
    
    Jimbo
56.2027SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 02 1995 11:0827
  But to blame Drew for the Patriots not making the playoffs you'd have to
answer the question, what's he doing wrong this year that he didn't do wrong
last year when they made the playoffs. Well, the list appears to be as follows.
This year Drew:

  - Fails to hand the ball to the running back in a way that causes them to
    run for yardage.

  - Fails to take the snap in a way that results in the offensive line making
    holes for the runners.

  - Fails to take the snap in a way that results in the offensive line
    protecting the pocket.

  - Fails to put proper spin on the ball so that when it's laid in the bread
    basket of a receiver that receiver can hold on to the ball.

  - Fails to throw or hand off the ball with such adhesive momentum that the
    guy running with the ball doesn't drop it.

  - Fails to watch from the bench with sufficient concern on his face to allow
    the punter to kick the ball more than 90% the distance of the snap.

  Yeah, we need a new quarterback. That will fix everything.

  GO PATRIOTS!!
  George
56.2028What a guy, that Jimbo!CNTROL::SALMONThu Nov 02 1995 11:326
    Re: -2026
              I hope so too, Jimbo!!
    
    
    
                                    JS
56.2029plus the defense sucksCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Nov 02 1995 11:5113
    
    Drew problem is simple he's thinking too much. He doesn't have the gray 
    matter to concentrate for that long. 
    
    2nd problem is the coach fell in love with him. He eased up on him plus 
    he like some NE fans thought Drew was the second coming so they
    released all the good players that surround him last year figuring
    Drew could throw to anyone, anywhere, anytime. 
    
    3rd problem Vincent Brisby is no big time receiver so the teams can
    easily double Coates........
    
    mike
56.2030QB = Too much credit + Too much blameIROCZ::BKWALThu Nov 02 1995 12:0023
 I'll make a comment about Bledsoe then head back to the sore loser note.
 RE: -2 That's a very interesting list. I'd propose a more limited agenda.

	Try looking off the defensive backs occasionally. Bledsoe may have
	a cannon and a nice touch but he wouldn't have to be quite so precise
	if he didn't lock on to his target.

	Bledsoe never was and will never be a scrambler. However, the better
	pocket passers usually have a few moves when they come under pressure.
	It seems if Bledsoe gets pressured up the gut and can't step up into
	the pocket, he has little mobility side-to-side. Developing a little
	slide step right or left would help.

	Work on his ball handling. He dosen't appear to hide the ball very
	well on fakes and doesn't shield the defense from seeing the handoff.

 Would the Pats be winning if he did all of the above? Probably not. Would
 it help the offensive and allow him to take less of a beating? I'd guess
 so. Would it make him a better quarterback? IMHO yes. Will the coach be
 calling me anytime soon for my input? Seems like he's managed to win a
 couple of rings without it. I don't think I'll wait for the call. ;-)
        
56.2031MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 02 1995 12:258
    
      .2030 makes a lot of sense to me. .2027 sounds like someone who
     hasn't watched the Pats all year and doesn't even know who they're
     playing this week. Drew has his faults but as a Giants fan friend of 
     mine said of Phil Simms long before the Giants ever won their first 
     SB, "he's good enough to win with".
    
     
56.2032SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 02 1995 12:3214
RE         <<< Note 56.2031 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>.2027 sounds like someone who
>     hasn't watched the Pats all year and doesn't even know who they're
>     playing this week. 

  So you are saying the Patriots do have a good offensive line, they do have
good runners, they do have receivers that hang on to the ball, they do have
a good kicker, their problems are all Bledsoe's fault and I'd know that if I
had watched the games?

  If that's not what you are saying then your sentence above makes no sense.

  George
56.2033MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonThu Nov 02 1995 12:4821
>  So you are saying the Patriots do have a good offensive line, they do have
>good runners, they do have receivers that hang on to the ball, they do have
>a good kicker, their problems are all Bledsoe's fault and I'd know that if I
>had watched the games?

 He doesn't have to say those things at all.  In .2027 you started with:

>  But to blame Drew for the Patriots not making the playoffs you'd have to
>answer the question, what's he doing wrong this year that he didn't do wrong
>last year when they made the playoffs. 

 A good start.  Then you give some bogus list and suggest Drew must be
 responsible for all those problems.  Those things are all major factors
 in while the Patriots stink, no doubt, but don't think Drew gets off easily
 and doesn't have to take a MAJOR share of the responsibility of the poor
 season.  He's had a poor season, no doubt about it, and THAT is what you
 might (or maybe YOU wouldn't) know if yoiu had kept up with the first half
 of the season.

 I agree that your comments sound like comments from someone who likes Drew
 and hasn't paid one bit of attention to the season so far.
56.2034MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 02 1995 12:557
    
      No one's "blaming Drew for the Pats not making the playoffs".
     It's been said time and time again in here and elsewhere that
     Drew hasn't had a very good season (poor, really) but there is
     a long list of reasons why the Pats probably won't make the 
     playoffs. George would know that if he was paying attention 
     instead of trying to get some.
56.2035Er Bill, me and the coaches were perfect, players didn't execute; fine BillAKOCOA::BREENThu Nov 02 1995 13:4417
    I don't like to comment on the Patriots because I've only seen them for
    the Buffalo game and some parts of KC that I taped, mainly second half
    so I've seen the best of them.  Against Buffalo the pressure by
    McGinnest and Slade saved them in a game they refused to put away and
    had every break go the Pat's way.
    
    Bledsoe looked no different than last year; his big strength is a pin
    point accurate pass of 10-25 thrown extremely hard; his weakness is
    long throws where he still throws on a plane and lacks the throw which
    has loft and sinks at the end.  Perhaps for him to do this he'd have to
    throw 60-70 yard bombs - his 40-50 passes are still on a line.
    
    Pats need a quarterback coach and a General Manager.  Ironically
    today's Glove quotes Connie Fitzimmons about M.L. Carr's having both
    positions and Connie talks about the need for balance and
    accountability which Parcells lacks.  Or, in more simpler terms,
    Parcell's excuses fall on sympathetic ears, Mr. G.M. Bill Parcells.
56.2036SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 02 1995 14:0320
  P.C. Police abuse continues from last year's Patriots fans who are guilty
about not still being on the Patriots bandwagon and are looking for someone
to kick.

  Was the list I put in there right or wrong? Yes or no.

  I suggested the patriots were

    - having problems with the offensive line resulting in no pass protection
      and no holes for runners,

    - Have no running game

    - receivers have been having problems holding on to the ball

    - punters can't kick.

  Now is that list right or wrong? Are those problems or not?

  George
56.2037exMSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 02 1995 15:0412
    >> P.C. Police abuse continues from last year's Patriots fans who 
    >> are guilty about not still being on the Patriots bandwagon and 
    >> are looking for someone to kick.

       I've been in here all along. You're the guy who admitted that he 
       didn't pay the Pats any attention until after the baseball season
       was over. You're also the guy who professed to being a "rabid
       Boston Braves fan" though you didn't start a Braves note until 
       after the Atlanta Braves were into their third World Series.
       Someone who didn't know better might surmise that you just show
       up anywhere you think you can draw attention.
    
56.2038MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonThu Nov 02 1995 15:0713
	George, George, George,

	Can't you read ?  Can't you ?

	Every response to your questions indicated those were problems.
	No doubt about it.  No one ever said they weren't.

	You were the only one suggesting Drew be blamed for those things.
	No one will.  We will blame Drew for lots of other things which
	are his fault, and which have led directly to the poor scoring of
	the Patriots this year, and their poor showing in the red zone.

	Does that sink in now ?
56.2039MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 02 1995 15:225
    
         It wasn't just people responding to George who indicated 
        those were the problems. It's been stated *ALL ALONG* that
        those were the problems. George just wants someone to play
        with. Again.
56.2040SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 02 1995 15:4031
Re         <<< Note 56.2037 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>       You're also the guy who professed to being a "rabid
>       Boston Braves fan" though you didn't start a Braves note until 
>       after the Atlanta Braves were into their third World Series.
    
  Prepare to eat your words:

         <<< HUMANE::DISK$CONFERENCES:[NOTES$LIBRARY]BASEBALL.NOTE;2 >>>
                                 -< Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 20.74                   The Atlanta Braves Note                  74 of 1773
PAXVAX::MAIEWSKI                                      6 lines  22-MAR-1990 13:52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  According to the Boston Globe, Tom Glavine will get the start on opening day.
He said he was supprised that it didn't go to Smoltz. Also, there's still talk
around the Boston press of Lee Smith going to Atlanta. He says he wouldn't mind
playing there. 

  George (new Braves fan)

================================================================================

  Oops, looks like I've been a fan since at least 22-MAR-1990. Guess you are
WRONG AGAIN Tommy.

  Actually I think it's kind of funny the way you guys are obssessed with what
I say. No I don't clamer for that type of attention as you suggest, but it is
rather comical the way you guys follow me around like little puppy dogs. 

  George
56.2041MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 02 1995 15:5014
    >> Prepare to eat your words:

       It is a fact that you did not start a Braves note until after 
       the Braves were in their third World Series. Look it up, George.

    >> Actually I think it's kind of funny the way you guys are obssessed 
    >> with what I say. 

       Nothing could be futher from the truth. Go away, George. Need I make 
       that any plainer? It's obvious by the tone of your notes, especially
       in this particular topic, that you aren't trying to add anything.
       You're just looking for a reaction. You say folks are blaming Drew
       for the Pats not making the playoffs. Where was that? Care to point
       it out? No one ever said it. 
56.2042CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Nov 02 1995 17:353
    
    besides the pats still aren't mathematically eliminated yet from either
    winning the division or a wildcard.........
56.2043ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Nov 02 1995 18:204
56.2044CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Nov 02 1995 19:132
    
    only if they get rid of Reeves...........
56.2045In case anyone cares about football in this note! ;-)TNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasMon Nov 06 1995 13:093
    New England 20, New York Jets 7.
    
    NAZZ
56.2046MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonMon Nov 06 1995 13:174
>          -< In case anyone cares about football in this note!  ;-) >-

	Is that what a Pats-Jets game is considered these days ?  Football ?
	Your definition of football is a lot more wider ranging than mine is.
56.2047What - enjoy a beautiful sunny day instead of watching this?TNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasMon Nov 06 1995 13:305
    An exciting gridiron tilt it was - two high caliber, professional
    organizations dedicated to winning, no holds barred for 60 full minutes
    of N-F-L action.
    
    NAZZ
56.2048SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 06 1995 13:327
  Hey, it's a win. One for the W column. When our guys are struggling, it's
something we can point to and say "that's a start".

  Now if they can only bump off Miami next week they'll be on a roll.

  Big if,
  George
56.2049EDWIN::WAUGAMANIf you're traveling back to GeorgiaMon Nov 06 1995 15:0610
    
>    An exciting gridiron tilt it was - two high caliber, professional
>    organizations dedicated to winning, no holds barred for 60 full minutes
>    of N-F-L action.
    
    That continues to be the No-Fun-League to many of us...
    
    
    glenn
    
56.2050MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Nov 06 1995 15:166
    >> Hey, it's a win. One for the W column. When our guys are struggling, 
    >> it's something we can point to and say "that's a start".

       That's what we thought after the Buffalo game ( I know, you didn't 
       watch) then the Pats went out the next week and lost to Carolina.
    
56.2051CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Nov 06 1995 15:2610
>       That's what we thought after the Buffalo game ( I know, you didn't 
>       watch) then the Pats went out the next week and lost to Carolina.

Hey, that Carolina team is a powerhouse.  They've got a better record than a
lot of teams in the league, and just knocked off the Super Bowl champs!


;^)
    

56.2052CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 06 1995 15:5013
RE         <<< Note 56.2050 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>       That's what we thought after the Buffalo game ( I know, you didn't 
>       watch) then the Pats went out the next week and lost to Carolina.
    
  Funny, even though I only watch 1/2 a year I'm 10 times the fan you will ever
be. At lest I'm trying to find something positive in a home team win. 

  The team that you saw the Pats lose to just knocked off the Super Bowl champs
to take their 4th in a row. And the Pats took Carolina into overtime which is
more than the 49'ers could do.

  George
56.2053MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Nov 06 1995 16:0719
    
  >> Funny, even though I only watch 1/2 a year I'm 10 times the fan 
  >> you will ever be. At lest I'm trying to find something positive 
  >> in a home team win. 

     Keep the "what is or isn't a fan" debate over in that other note
     so that I can easily avoid it. I don't care. I can find plenty 
     positive in this win, starting with the fact that it *is* a win.

  >> The team that you saw the Pats lose to just knocked off the Super 
  >> Bowl champs to take their 4th in a row. And the Pats took Carolina 
  >> into overtime which is more than the 49'ers could do.

     The battered, bruised and depleted 49ers. A nice Pats win yesterday
     but they could very easily go out and lay down against the Dolphins.
     I'd like to believe that things are turning around but *I've* been
     watching them all year and it'll take more than a game or two to
     convince me that they've turned it around. Strange though that 0-23 
     isn't a slump but two wins is "a roll".
56.2054WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Nov 06 1995 23:3514
    
    All summer I heard how the Pats could go 0-3 to start the season because 
    they had such a hard lineup.
    
    Well, they went 1-2, with the "1" coming on a hometown ref gimme on
    Drew's QB sneak.  But still, the Pats felt really great because, darn,
    those *were* hard teams.  And then they kept losing.  What's more,
    those hard teams got beat by the Colts, the Saints, the Panthers...
    
    Hey, I hope the Pats pull a huge winning streak, but I when I go to
    Foxboro, I still see more players sitting on the bench than I do
    getting fired up.
    
    - Sean
56.2055Shaded optimism here for PatsAKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 07 1995 13:2625
    Well I didn't want to comment until I saw taped game.  I'd already read
    and heard versions of it.
    
    Bledsoe has indeed come a long way.  He was excellent in all facets and
    the play calling was pretty good against a team with some excellent
    performers on defense in Jones and Douglas.
    
    On defense Willie McGinnest has really come into his own and is playing
    on a par with anyone in the league and Slade took advantage of Jets
    weaknesses to make some big plays but Willie's speed and agressiveness
    are the key to the Patriots right now.
    
    The Jets had very poor offensive execution displaying Kotite's
    inadequacies as much as anything.  Foley looked good and would have
    looked better if anyone could catch his passes.  Shame he got hurt on
    meaningless last play.
    
    If the Patriots could look at themselves as an expansion team for whom
    only great desire can propel to victory they can still be successful.
    Willie and Slade could prove very tough for Miami to handle.  Martins
    stats were a little misleading as he had a lot of no-gains mixed with
    long runs but I didn't have the second half on tape.  Why?
    
    Because I had filled the tape up with Doug,Rugrats,PowerRangers,Reboot..
    for my son.
56.2056IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Nov 07 1995 13:505
>    Because I had filled the tape up with Doug,Rugrats,PowerRangers,Reboot..
>    for my son.

"Doug" and "Rugrats" are cool.  "PowerRangers" and "Reboot" sip.  The
Patriots are somewhere in between...
56.2057Cracks me up...SALEM::DODACelts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailableTue Nov 07 1995 13:581
Rugrats and Doug are cool, add Rocko's Modern Life too...
56.2058CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Nov 07 1995 14:071
The REALLY scary part is that I know these shows......
56.2059Going , goneAKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 07 1995 14:225
    Clarissa doesn't go over to big with me and Phil.  My wife likes Reboot
    and that other one with Squish and Mr ???.
    
    You're right, PowerRangers seems to be slipping in popularity.  We used
    to have a half dozen on the couch singing gogo ...  Top age 5.
56.2060IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Nov 07 1995 14:367
>    You're right, PowerRangers seems to be slipping in popularity. 

That wasn't the point - they sipped at the height of their popularity.  They
will sip forever.

Daryll's right - Rocko's Modern Life is way cool.  I've only seen it a couple
of times, though...
56.2061CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Nov 07 1995 14:371
A lot of those are really adult cartoons, that's why we think they're cool...
56.2062IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Nov 07 1995 14:392
Are you claiming you're an adult?
56.2063SALEM::DODACelts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailableTue Nov 07 1995 14:425
Anyone else notice that Rocko's theme is done by the B-52's?

2 Stupid Dogs is a riot too. Goes right over my 4yr old head....

daryll
56.2064;^)MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Nov 07 1995 15:308
>2 Stupid Dogs is a riot too. Goes right over my 4yr old head....

	Which makes us all wonder how you can figure it out.




	billl
56.2065CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Nov 07 1995 15:326
>
>Are you claiming you're an adult?
>

Well, chronologically speaking.....

56.2066SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!!Tue Nov 07 1995 15:437
    
>>    What happens when the 1997 Patriots take the field in the new stadium
>>    in Cleveland?
    
    You might admit that Bledsoe > Testaverde?
    
    	Ted
56.2067And how old is she? Closer to 30 than 16 I'd betAKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 07 1995 15:526
    I was definitely referring to PowerRanger's appeal to the 10 and under
    set who weren't watching to ogle Kimberly.  But wherever they
    originally were they've gone down as the marketing geniuses have
    tinkered with the simple humor of the original.
    
    And if you think PRs is bad you should see some of the spinoffs.
56.2068SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 13 1995 12:208


          One Squished Fish!



  George
56.2069MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Nov 13 1995 15:0814
    
       Easy to say something nice after this one because it was our
      best game of the season. The nicest thing of the day was the
      offensive line followed (literally) by Curtis Martin and also
      Matt Bahr. It was also nice that the Pats managed to keep 
      Irving Fryar from going nuts like he usually does against us.
      Much of the credit for that has to go to the d-line who finally
      got the upfield push to free up McGinest and Slade on the outside.
      When Marino did have time to pass, the secondary usually had 
      pretty good coverage. And credit Vincent Brown and the d-line
      for keeping Miami to 75 yards total rushing. The biggest difference
      in the game was that we could run and they couldn't. When the 
      Pats play like this, they can beat anybody. Unfortunately, they
      don't play like this often enough.
56.2070Curtis Martin Roolz!HBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboMon Nov 13 1995 15:120
56.2071AKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 13 1995 16:3215
    Well they sure are a hard team to figure.  I have been licking my
    wounds about a comment earlier about Parcell's pre-season problem of
    "How to hide the wagon" that the Pat's had become.  Then they were the
    turnip wagon.
    
    And now they are in better position than last year since it looks like
    they can lose a game and qualify and ironically may have a shot at the
    division crown since the competition all have problems.
    
    I guess you just enjoy the good and shrug off the bad and not try to
    figure it out - except excellent special teams have made a big
    difference.
    
    	And speaking of running, until this week 9 out of 10 games the team
    with better total run yards would win the game.
56.2072WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDa Raidas!!!!!Mon Nov 13 1995 16:583
    
    
         Yeah Ttom: your Welcome, (DECFF)   :-)
56.2073SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Mon Nov 13 1995 20:3728
    
    	Even with a great team effort. They still have to stay focused and
    win EVERY game. Yet, take it one game at a time. In order to win the
    Division they need Buffalo to go 3-3 (With Patriots beating Buffalo),
    Miami goes 4-2, Patriots 6-0. If the Patriots lose Buffalo and Miami
    have to lose another game. Pats would win tie-break for Division
    because of a 7-1 division record.
    	Realistically they should be looking for a wild-card spot. KC and
    Raiders will take up 2 out of 6 spots. Expect Buffalo to win the East,
    with either Pittsburgh or Cleveland taking the Central. Which leaves
    2 wild-card spots left.
    	There are 10 teams with either a 6-4, 5-5, or 4-6 record. With 9
    going for the 2 wild-card spots. One of the 10 will be the AFC Central
    champion. If the Patriots finish at 10-6. They will have a 7-1
    division record, with a 9-3 conference record. At 10-6 the only
    possible tie-breaker they would lose. Is against Denver if it came down
    to head-to-head matchups. A tie-breaker against anybody else, they
    would win. The win the tie-breakers on either head-to-head, conference,
    or division record.
    	If they finish at 9-7, its better for them to lose to New Orleans
    then anybody else. Reason being is because they would still have a
    7-1 Division and 9-3 conference record. They would be 0-4 against
    the NFC (West).
    	At 8-8 they would need some help, but it isn't far fetched.
    Especially if they lose to New Orleans plus somebody. Since they could
    be 7-1 or 6-2 in division, while being 8-4 in conference.
    
    Ron
56.2074CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Nov 14 1995 10:595
    
    Well it's a given they'll loose in Pittsburg. So they better win the
    rest.......
    
    mike
56.2075SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Nov 14 1995 11:125
  Would that be anything like the given that the Cowboys would beat the 49'ers?

  GO PATS!!! RUN THE TABLE!!! AGAIN!!!

  George
56.2076SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 20 1995 13:4225
  Ouch, that hurt. It appeared as though the Patriots lost the war in the
trenches. Every time Bledsoe went back to pass it was as if his offensive line
was all wearing white shirts and running toward him instead of away from him.
Well OK not every time but he sure doesn't have a lot of time to think about
where he's going to throw the ball. And once again not many holes for the
runners.

  Tough loss, last week they beat a team that should have beat them (or so
Marino says) and this week they lost to a team they should have beaten. Boy
Harbrough (sp?) sure looked good with the time his line was giving him to
throw. 

  Oh well, maybe the problem was that the "A squad" had already left for
Buffalo and will take their 2nd in a row from the team up North. Stranger
things have happened. 

  Actually this is nothing new. I remember once back a couple decades ago when
the Baltimore Colts and Dolphins were fighting for the division and the Bills
and Jets really sucked. The Patriots finished the season by killing Miami and
Baltimore by 30-3 type scores but lost to New York and Buffalo in their last
four games.

  Back to the right track,
  GO PATS!!!
  George
56.2077So anybody actually watch it?AKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 20 1995 15:318
    Did anyone watch that Patriot game?  Johnson and McGinnest were the
    defensive keys to that team and Johnson indicated in the paper that
    Faulk was just too much.  I get the impression that Willie didn't have
    the type of game he'd had the four or five previous.
    
    But it was still 24 points given up which shouldn't have been
    insurmountable - looks like mistakes,mistakes,mistakes killed those
    Pats.  Does all this moving franchises talk get these guys down.
56.2078SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 20 1995 15:4613
  Well all that talk didn't get the Colts down. Maybe they were relieved of
guilt now that someone else has moved in to their old city :*)} 

  I think it was the trenches. When your guy is getting knocked down and having
to make hurried throws, your runners have no holes, their quarterback has all
day to make a throw and their runners have and holes wide enough to float
through on a barge then all your guys look bad and their guys look great. 

  As John Madden quoted Mrs Moose on the FOX game "They've got to keep their
backs flat on the blocks". The Patriots didn't appear have many flat backs
yesterday more like they were flat on their back.

  George
56.2079MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Nov 20 1995 15:529
    
      You'd be hard-pressed to point to anything yesterday that 
     the Pats did better than the Colts. Both of the Colts' lines
     played better than ours. Their skill people outplayed ours
     including Harbaugh looking better than Bledsoe although Drew
     was not helped by several dropped passes. Even Ben Coates
     had two fumbles. All around it was just a poor effort from a 
     team that couldn't afford one.
     
56.2080MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Nov 20 1995 16:2318
     In other news, last week Governor Weld raised the prospect 
    of a Kraft financed stadium on land owned by the state. The
    idea has been summarily dismissed by Kraft's people as with-
    out foundation. Poor Bill Weld was really naive enough to be-
    lieve that Kraft would go against the current trend and act-
    ually pay for his own stadium albeit on government land? Not
    gonna happen, Billy. If Kraft had better leverage (read:Pats
    were winning) he'd probably be putting the screws to us now
    or at least mentioning it everyday to any reporter that would
    listen. But the Pats are more erractic than Rosa Lopez and 
    Kraft knows what an idle threat it would be at this point to
    threaten to take his Patsies to Hartford. We'll probably hear 
    the spectre of a possible move again this offseason but the 
    reality is that in a town like Boston and a state like Mass-
    achusetts, Kraft's chances of getting a government financed 
    stadium are damned slim.
    
56.2081CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Nov 21 1995 12:536
    
    what's the scoop on cutting Hurst. seems his agent says he's playing
    hurt? Will he get picked up and become a star for another team? Another
    black eye for GM Bill Parcells.......
    
    mike
56.2082MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Nov 21 1995 13:048
	I don't see Hurst's leaving causing anyone a "black 
	eye", except for the owner that picks him up.  Although
	he's probably the best DB on the Pats, he's also one
	of the worst cover men I've watched.  He gets beat
	more than a red-headed step-child.


	billl
56.2083CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Nov 21 1995 14:136
    
    well Billl, Coach  Parcells called him possibly the best cover man he had
    ever coached. Now to cut him imo says that GM Parcells' evaluations
    skills are questionable.
    
    mike
56.2084MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Nov 21 1995 14:4814
>    well Billl, Coach  Parcells called him possibly the best cover man
>    he had ever coached. Now to cut him imo says that GM Parcells' 
>    evaluations skills are questionable.

	That, IMO, speaks volumns about either the rest of the DBs
	he's coached, Parcells' "evaluation skills", or (more likely)
	my ability to judge DB quality.

	I do know that if'n I was picking a team Hurst would
	be one of the last DBs I'd pick.



	billl
56.2085MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Nov 21 1995 15:338
    
       Hurst used to be a great cover man but he's completely lost
      his confidence. You watch the Deions and the Rod Woodsons' and
      they have a certain swagger and will outright challenge receivers.
      Hurst, on the other hand, looked like the proverbial dog that has
      been kicked too much. He was playing not to fail toward the end 
      and that inevitably leads to failure. I'll miss him because he
      played hard for us but I won't miss watching him get burned.
56.2086AKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 21 1995 16:514
    I thought he was terrific last year.  Obviously he's been playing hurt
    or has dropped precipitously.  He was one of the three or four keys to
    the success of last years team: Goad,Turner...(I guess that tells us
    about all we need to know of this year's team).
56.2087Maurice " Run right by me " Hurst, Outta Here!FABSIX::E_MAXWELLThe Land Of The Stainless MaidenWed Nov 22 1995 02:2011
    RE.2083>> well Billl, Coach  Parcells called him possibly the best
    cover man he had ever coached.
    
    Incorrect quote! He said that hurst has a chance to be the best
    coverman he ever coached. This of course was said at the start
    of pre-season I believe. Man Oh Man am I glad to see him go, but
    who am I going to direct my anger at now?
    
                                              Go Tuna!
    
                                                    Lil Ed
56.2088Tuna is a egomanic that cannot admit he can't be a GMAD::HEATHRelax its only October they got timeWed Nov 22 1995 11:1916
    
    
    
      I know I'm in the minority but yes, Hurst has had a bad year but for
    the past 4 years has been the best CB on the Pats.  Lil Ed, yea lets 
    evaluate 10 games and make it a career, come on Hurst is better than
    Reynolds by a long shot.  In fact Hurst is the best DB on the team.  He
    has been playing with no confidence for a reason.  Guyton NEVER seems
    to be where he is suppose to be, if he does get there its a day late
    and a dollar short.  Only reason Guyton is still here is the ex-giant
    factor.  Hurst was here when Tuna got here and putting the blame on him
    is just his way of not admitting a mistake.  He signed Guyton and
    Reynolds both to big contracts and neither have played even good since
    their arrival.
    
    Jerry
56.2089Lost what little respect I had left for BPWONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Nov 22 1995 11:2319
    
    Gutless move by Parcells.
    
    How does Hurst go from starter to fired in one day (by a coach who
    claims not to make Monday decisions)?
    
    Answer:  he's not one of Bill's boys.  Gee, there's $1.4M Dellenbach
    riding the pine, benched for $119K Wollobaugh.  Gee, there's
    Guyton, arguably twice as bad as Hurst.  Is Megget really worth the
    $$$$$?
    
    A team with Hurst, Goad, Turner, Hurst, Thompson, Timpson went 10-6.
    Despite Parcells, not because of him.  Well, old Bill took care of 
    all that, and now what's left - *HIS* team.
    
    Yet Mr. Ego won't even admit when he sucks as GM, and makes sure
    players he had nothing to do with get tagged scapegoat.  Gutless.
    
    - Sean
56.2090SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 27 1995 11:2215
  This is one of those cases where you take your nose between your thumb and
for finger, squeeze firmly but not so much as to cause pain and say "OK another
one for the W column, we'll take it." 

  7-9 dropped balls, at least, 2 turn overs, several untimely penalties and
still the Patriots beat the division leading Bills for the 2nd time this year. 

  The announcers seem to be praising Parcells for sending the team a wake up
call by releasing Hurst. Also they said that they may have wanted to gave the
new kid Law a chance to play.

  Now if the Pats can keep it going and beat the Saints and Jets they will
be all even up at 7-7.

  George
56.2091ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 27 1995 12:452
56.2092SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 27 1995 12:556
  Where do you see a bandwagon? I've been a fan since Kraft bought the team
and I don't see any other note so far today.

  The Patriots seem to be a team with very few bandwagon type fans.

  George
56.2093MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Nov 27 1995 13:139
    
      Yesterday's game wasn't anything to get too excited about.
     The Pats still don't have defensive push up the middle. Ty
     Law looked good on his INTs but then was way out of position 
     at least twice, one of which resulted in a Billy Brooks td
     without a Patriot within 20 yards of Brooks. Bledsoe is still
     inconsistent as are his receivers. If Buffalo had stuck with
     the dives up the middle that were working when Thomas went out,
     the Pats might not have won the game. 
56.2094SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Mon Nov 27 1995 13:1719
    
    	Patriots suck everybody in for another week. Lets concede playoff
    spots to KC, Raiders, Pittsburgh, and Buffalo. Which leaves us with
    2 spots left. Indy should make the playoffs, unless they choke. All 4
    remaining games are against sub .500 teams. Carolina/Jacksonville/
    San Diego/New England.
    	The Pats need help but not that much. If they finish at 9-7 they
    will make the playoffs. 
    
    Indy 	7-5
    Miami       6-6
    Denver      6-6
    Patriots    5-7
    Cincinatti  5-7
    Houston     5-7
    Seattle     5-7
    
    
    Ron
56.2095ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 27 1995 13:333
56.2096SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 27 1995 13:498
  The Patriots need to stop making stupid mistakes and they need to develop
some consistency. If by some miracle they run the table again and make the
playoffs that's fine but for now I'd be happy with seeing them play a good game
next week against the Saints.

  One at a time,
  GO PATRIOTS!!!
  George
56.2097SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Mon Nov 27 1995 14:3911
    re .2095,
    
    	The Patriots were 1-5 the first 6 games. They have now gone 4-2
    in the last 6. After the Monday night game, they had a let down and
    took Carolina lightly. Plus, they have lost to Indy. All in all not
    a bad 6 game stretch. Add into the mix that Bledsoe's shoulder is
    healed, Coates ankle is healed, the offensive line changes have
    produced a running game. I think they can win the rest of the games.
    
    
    Ron
56.2098IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Mon Nov 27 1995 14:417
I've gotten to the point where I don't care if they make the playoffs.  With
last year's team, there was a feeling they could make some noise.  Even on the
off chance that they make it this year, their pass defense will get
*shredded*...

Bill Brooks was in his own zip code a couple of times...
56.2099SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 27 1995 15:159
  Agreed, the thing for the Patriots now is to just show some consistency.
Winning playoffs is for another year. If they play some solid football, beat
the Saints and Jets and split with the Colts and Packers that will be more than
enough.

  Meanwhile how about them Colts? Are they for real or are they playing above
themselves? If they keep this up they may just win the division.

  George
56.2100MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Nov 27 1995 15:2611
    
       I ain't giving up on this season and the playoffs that easily.
      It'll take some doing to get there but the way the AFC is shaping
      up, it's anyone's ball game once the playoffs start. The Pats have
      to actually get there and given the way they've played all season
      that's a big question mark. But if they do make it they could put 
      together a run like San Diego did last year because I really didn't 
      think SD was the best team in the AFC they just git hit at the right
      time. Of course, our secondary trying to cover the Raiders receivers 
      could be pretty ugly but anything can happen in a one-and-done
      format.
56.2101CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Nov 27 1995 17:423
    
    Steelers are coming together better than Patsies and will take them out
    of their misery.......
56.2102My glass is half full! ;-)TNPUBS::NAZZAROSo long Sherm!Tue Nov 28 1995 13:056
    I refuse to concede a playoff spot to Buffalo.  I think they will
    finish 9-7, and will lose all tiebreakers with the Pats.  NE could
    even still win the AFC East with a lotta help (a Colts collapse would
    do the trick, along with MIami going 2-2 in their last four games).
    
    NAZZ
56.2103IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Tue Nov 28 1995 13:153
>along with MIami going 2-2 in their last four games

You think they'll do that well?
56.2104McDonough on free agency ruining football because he can't pick'em anymoreAKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 28 1995 14:2715
    I meant to post a note re. Will McDonough's Saturday morning article.
    
    He was complaining again about free agency spoiling NFL football but
    one of his arguments was the poor performance of he and his colleagues
    in his weekly Globe picks that they post on Friday.  Unbelievable. 
    Those schmucks having been able to pick ever except for a few lucky
    strings.
    
    He's such a blatant shill for Kraft and NFL ownership perse.
    
    Actually this has been a very predictable year.  The teams that run the
    ball win and those that can't stop the run lose.  The hard part is
    predicting who can and can't run.  The other oddity is the games going
    to overtime and having touchdowns decide the outcome rather than field
    goals; not to speak of late interceptions and fumbles being decisive.
56.2105Been a big fan for a few years.......don't make senseAD::HEATHRelax its only October they got timeTue Nov 28 1995 15:2416
    
    
    
       I'll have to second what Tommy said about givin in for this year. 
    The Pats could very easily go 4-0 end up 9-7 and sneak in the back
    door to the playoffs.  They also could go 1-3 (with a win against the
    Jets).  The 4th quarter comeback on Sunday sorta reminded me of the 
    comeback win over Minny last year that sent them on their way, I really
    believe they will go 4-0 and end up 9-7.  They will end up with only 2
    div losses which should be good enough for any tie-breakers and I think
    their conference record ain't that bad.  3 losses have come against the
    NFC.  I am not counting them out but as someone said they've been a fan
    since Kraft bought the team probably wouldn't understand that there are
    16 games in an NFL season in '95 and we've only played 12.
    
    Jerry
56.2106ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Nov 28 1995 15:3117
RE    <<< Note 56.2105 by AD::HEATH "Relax its only October they got time" >>>

>    I am not counting them out but as someone said they've been a fan
>    since Kraft bought the team probably wouldn't understand that there are
>    16 games in an NFL season in '95 and we've only played 12.
    
  I'm the one that said I've been a Pats fan since Kraft bought the team but
I'm sorry, I can't parse the sentence above. 

  Who is it that doesn't understand the number of games played per year and
what does that have to do with being a Pats fan? 

  It's my understanding that each team plays 16 games, half in their division
and the rest divided between the teams of one division in the other conference
and teams of about your same level in your own conference. Is that wrong?

  George 
56.2107MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Nov 28 1995 15:397
    
      I thought it was kind of strange when George said that there
     weren't many bandwagon jumpers amongst Pats fans in one breath
     and then in the next breath said he's been a Pats fan since Kraft 
     bought the team (that's almost four whole years!) but I've prom-
     ised myself that I wouldn't respond every time I thought George 
     said something ridiculous. It ain't easy.
56.2108SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Nov 28 1995 17:1017
  So if there is an expansion team and they have only been playing for 4 or
less years does that mean that all their fans are bandwagon fans? Or is there
an exemption in the rigid set of fan rules for expansion teams? 

  What's ridiculous Tommy is your assertion that there is some sort of set of
rules dictating who can be a fan and who can not. It's about as ridiculous as
your rigid rules as to what sports can be discussed and what sports are
politically incorrect. 

  These games are children's games being played by grown men and women for
the purpose of our entertainment, what sense does it make to say that there
are rules saying when we can and can not be a fan? Why can't someone become
a Patriots fan when they feel like it?

  Lighten up, sports are suppose to be for fun.

  George
56.2109ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Nov 28 1995 17:246
56.2111CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Nov 28 1995 18:066
    Well I don't know but George if you've been a Mass resident all your
    life or for longer than 4 years why then did you all of a sudden become
    a Patriot fan 4 years ago? Did you never watch football until 4 years
    ago?
    
    mike
56.2112What 1993 bandwagonAKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 28 1995 18:569
    I would hardly call Kraft's first year jumping on a bandwagon since
    they'd only won one game the previous year under MacPherson and
    Orthwein.  I could see people who'd lost interested in the
    Berry/Remington years coming back for Parcells but there was not to be
    a true Bandwagon until December of last year and a short lived one at
    that.
    
    Anybody coming on the Pat's "bandwagon" at this point belong in the
    optimists club not the bandwagon.
56.2113WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Nov 28 1995 23:0728
    
    I have a problem with the term "bandwagon jumper."
    
    I have season tickets.  Before I could afford them, I'd go to 4 games
    a year except in college in Syracuse (but I'd always see the Pats in 
    Buffalo).
    
    I remember being called a bandwagon jumper for saying we'd never win
    with Eason, saying getting rid of Flutie was stupid, saying that Meyer's 
    1985 team went to the Super Bowl despite being under Berry rather than 
    because of it.  Being negative/realistic/critical seems to equate to
    "bandwagon jumper."
    
    Unless you wholeheartedly support positively every move your team ever
    does, slobbering with worship over every nincompoop decision ownership
    makes, you get called a bandwagon jumper from time to time.
    
    Anyway, I've learned to live with it.  I've followed the Pats
    religiously since I was old enough to watch TV.  I always root for 'em,
    but I criticize and boo what I think are dumb moves.  Whatever that
    makes me, it does.
    
    So I guess I'm a bandwagon jumper for never liking the hiring of
    Parcells and thinking we're not going to win a SB with him at the helm.
    I hope he does, but...  And still, I pay my $1K for tix every year.  
    
    - Sean
    
56.2114ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 29 1995 10:586
56.2115SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Dec 04 1995 12:2123
  Ouch, that was a tough loss. 

  Ty law seems to be in on lots of key plays which is both good and bad. It's
good because he's got talent and sometimes makes the play. It's bad because
he hasn't played much and it shows. There seemed to be at least a couple
touchdowns where his guy either ran past him to catch the ball or ran around
him with the ball but then he comes up with interceptions. I think it bodes
well for the future, he's likely to learn how to play before he gets too old to
play. 

  That last interception by Bledsoe hurt. I kept thinking "throw it away,
throw it away" but that's not what I meant. I sort of had the 5th row behind
the endzone in mind.

  No doubt this erases what ever chance the Pats had for the playoffs, no team
makes it with 8 losses even with 3 wild cards per conference. Bummer. But
there seems to be some young talent around and they can win when they are
playing well so the future looks good.

  Next week the Jets. It will be tough to finish 8-8 but they can do it.

  GO PATS!!!
  George
56.2116AKOCOA::BREENMon Dec 04 1995 12:4614
    This was simply a better team beating a mediocre team.  Last year's
    team probably could win but this team wasn't good enough.  I thought
    perhaps a warm weather team would have problems with the cold but it
    was the Pats that weakened in the cold.  Can't recall too many Patriots
    teams that gave up in the cold, even the awful teams.  For one thing it
    shows a lack of true leadership on the defense.
    
    I saw the Saints survive the very tough Panthers last Sunday night and
    could see they would be very tough this week.  Have to give old Jim
    Everett a lot of credit he's had a tough career but now is one of the
    top quaterbacks in the game.  He'd make a good mentor for Bledsoe but
    appears to have a few years left in his own right.
    
    Ironically the Pats are still now completely out of it.
56.2117CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Dec 04 1995 13:0013
From what I saw and heard, it looked to me like the Pats defense got whipped
like a red-headed stepchild....

Nawlins is playing good ball -- after dropping five stright they'd one 6-2
going into the game I believe.

I think this season is a bump in the road for the Patriots, but a lot is going
to hinge on Parcells' ability to evaluate and recruit talent.  

IMO, Parcells is a good coach, but he's not that good of a GM.  


'Saw
56.2118Ode to TunaWONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Dec 04 1995 13:2020
    
    Thanks Bill, savior of the Pats!
    
    Thanks for getting rid of that crappy 10-6 team of Goad, Turner, Timpson, Thompson
    and others and building this awesome 5-8 juggernaut!
    
    Thanks for getting that $42M boy Forrest Bledsoe a qb coach so he
    wouldn't be making 1st and 2nd year mental mistakes in his 3rd year.
    
    Thanks for Ray Perkins and Al Groh!
    
    Thanks for your those insightful views on how you "found a way to win"
    in your post-game dissertations ("I honestly don't know what's wrong
    with this team")  It's okay - we didn't pay you all that money to
    know, buddy!  
    
    Only question is, how come you keep playing that "one game wonder"
    Curtis Martin?  Why don't you get rid of him, too!?
    
    Just thanks for the best Christmas ever!
56.2119ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 04 1995 14:054
56.2120SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Dec 04 1995 14:307
  The Band Wagon is Alive!!!

  Any time a Boston team goes against a New York team it's secondary what's
  at stake.

  GO PATS, BEAT THE JETS!!!
  George
56.2121MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 04 1995 14:5821
             
           Really dumb pass by Bledsoe to seal the loss but the
          way the defense played yesterday we didn't have much
          chance of winning that game. Their hogs beat our hogs
          one on one all day long. Despite the offseason signings
          our front seven is still woefully inadequate. We couldn't
          generate any pressure on Everett at all without the blitz.
          And when we did blitz, he was successful at making us pay
          for it. Then there were the mental lapses and the poor 
          tackling by the secondary yet again and you have wonder 
          things like - how many of these guys are good enough to
          play on a championship calibre team? And if this team
          keeps taking one step forward then two steps back, how 
          long is Big Tuna with the bum ticker going to stick around
          at his age? For those of us who were expecting the Pats
          to make another step closer to being a SB contender this 
          year, yesterday's loss was the capper on a disappointing 
          season.
             
    
56.2122GIAMEM::HOVEYMon Dec 04 1995 15:283
    
    After game 1, headlines in the local rags....Parcells was called a
    Genius....
56.2123Gawd they seem to be gettin worse, Parcells is a terrible GMAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Dec 04 1995 15:3110
    
    
    
      Dumb is an understatement Tommy.  I was listening to the game on the
    way back from the Legion Christmas party was Gil and Gino where really
    hammerin da boyz.  Gino said it looked like the defense where running
    in cement.  They had nothing really positive to say 'cept that Martin
    had another good game.  
    
    Jerry
56.2124ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 04 1995 15:495
56.2125Worst of all, nobody will bench him.WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Dec 04 1995 15:5635
    
    Bledsoe is An Arm.
    
    Nothing more.  Stupid as they come, and the definition of 
    unmotivated.
    
    He's got a great Arm, and that's the only reason he's had any
    success.  No question, he can place the ball in spots no QB can.
    So the fact that he doesn't know how to look past his 1st or
    maybe 2nd receiver hasn't always hurt him.  He just looks at the
    first guy, who's about to get creamed by 3 defenders and rockets
    it in there.  This is a great way to treat wide receivers, by
    the way.
    
    And that's it.  As team after team has stated in post-game
    talk, the ability to pressure Bledsoe is the ability to undo
    him.  He is a rabbit.  Scared of everything, and useless out of
    the pocket.  Can't run, can't bootleg, can't think.  
    
    I know all the excuses - he's young.  He's not there to scramble.
    
    So fine, if everything else on the team is *perfect*, the best O Line
    in the world, a great running game, fast WR's, then the $42M boy
    can do well.  But, like, who couldn't?  And for less $$$.
    
    Is he 23 year old QB, with all its failings, or is he a $42M
    QB, with all its expectations.  He can't be both, and since he
    clearly seems to be the former, he shouldn't have been paid like
    he was.
    
    Forrest Bledsoe has one and only one tool, and I don't think 
    1) he cares to improve on that 2) the team cares to force him
    to (where's his QB coach).
    
    
56.2126WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Dec 04 1995 15:577
    
    > Bledsoe continues to show he is inferior to Testaverde.  Bledsoe is a
    > flash in the pan, he had one mediocre year with loads of TDs and INTs
    > and everyone got excited.
    
    Not everyone. 
    
56.2127ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 04 1995 16:004
56.2128SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Dec 04 1995 16:1412
  Well 23 is really young. I think Bledsoe has time to learn a few of these
things. 

  Last year wasn't he contending for a pro-bowl spot? Seems they ran off those
last 7 wins in a row primarily on a passing game. No team does that without
a QB that has some talent.

  I think he has the potential. Seems that it's easier to teach a QB with an
arm how to find an open man than it is to get someone with a good eye and no
arm to hit an open man.

  George
56.2129MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 04 1995 16:2216
    
      Bledsoe did't just contend for the Pro Bowl, he was in
     the Pro Bowl. Some folks got way too excited when we did 
     well and now other folks are way too down on him now that
     we're struggling. Bledose threw a dumb pass but it was
     not Drew Bledsoe who gave up big play after big play yester-
     day. I get just as frustrated as the next Pats fan when he
     does things like yesterday's game clincher but I still
     think that though he's no Marino, he's good enough to win
     with. I wouldn't say the same about 60% of the rest of the
     team. Right now for keepers' on this team I like our offensive
     line and our skill people with the exception of our receivers.
     Our defense is mediocre. No one's job should be safe because
     we could stand an upgrade at virtually every position with
     the possible execption of Chris Slade. If we have one big plus, 
     it's that on the whole we're young.
56.2130MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 04 1995 16:278
    
      re Groaner
    
       I hear that if Modell gets hauled to court over his proposed
      move, his defense will be to simply show pictures of the city 
      and then to bring forth a couple of typical Clevelanders like 
      Hal and yourself. If thats the case the judge'll probably vol-
      unteer to help him pack.
56.2131WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Dec 04 1995 16:2828
    
    Last year was a surprise.  They took teams by surprise.
    
    Good teams don't get caught by surprise twice.  They all
    went off and figured out how to exploit the deficiencies
    of Drew and came back this year and did it.
    
    Stodgy Bill and his lumbering stubborness doesn't apparantly
    understand that you've got to keep changing and reacting
    to things.  I swear to the heavens I was half expecting to
    see Bill bring Craig "You gotta run me more, coach" James
    back so I could hear that music to my ears over the Foxoboro
    loudspeakers...  "Handoff to Craig James.  Up the middle.  Loss
    of 2."
    
    Curtis is a great surprise this year, too!  And guess what?
    They'll screw that up, watch!  Next year, teams will decipher how 
    to defend against him, and where will Bill be?  Without a clue and 
    without an answer.  "Der, 50 consecutrive runs of Curtis up worked 
    last year, what happened this year?"
    
    Just like Ben Coates.  He was all pro last year.  Still a great
    receiver, but teams figured out the deal this year, and he's
    not even in Pro Bowl contention.  Not his fault - it's the
    infuriating system.
    
    - Sean
    
56.2132He just does not Think!PCBUOA::EHSMon Dec 04 1995 16:377
    
    I dont know if he can be taught (Bledsoe) he needs a Good "Game Mind"
    in order to perform under different situations, and he simply can't
    consistently think. He is like a Rabbit (scared!)
    
    	IMO,
    		ED 
56.2133CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Dec 04 1995 16:4762
>    Stodgy Bill and his lumbering stubborness doesn't apparantly
>    understand that you've got to keep changing and reacting
>    to things.  I swear to the heavens I was half expecting to
>    see Bill bring Craig "You gotta run me more, coach" James
>    back so I could hear that music to my ears over the Foxoboro
>    loudspeakers...  "Handoff to Craig James.  Up the middle.  Loss
>    of 2."
    

Actually, "Stodgy Bill" took his team to the Super Bowl twice and won with a
very conservative offense, that drove his fans nuts sometimes, but it was
a conservative offense that out-executed the opposition.

Everyone in the world knew the Giants were going to run on first down.  
Everbody!  Guys in the Soviet gulags knew that the Giants were going to run on
first down.

Until the Giants had an offensive line that could almost guarantee five yards
on that first down rush, it drove Giants fans nuts.  But then along came the
Suburbanites.  They moved everybody outta the way, including the Redskins
defensive line, which was pretty big at the time.

Every once in a while, every once in a while, he'd pass on first down.

But, in the northeast, in December, you're not really going to see a whole
lotta "Air Coryell" getting a lot of success.


True, he's got Ray Perkins as OC, and let's be honest, Ray is so conservative
that he makes Rush Limbaugh look like a bleeding heart liberal, but once the
teams gets the horses to make the plan work, it does work well.  

I've seen it produce two Super Bowl rings.



>    Just like Ben Coates.  He was all pro last year.  Still a great
>    receiver, but teams figured out the deal this year, and he's
>    not even in Pro Bowl contention.  Not his fault - it's the
>    infuriating system.
    
Wrong.  The Giants used the TE up the seam play for years, with Bavarro and
later with Howard Cross (who actually developed some hands over time).

What has shut that down Coates this year is the lack of other stuff to go to.

I think that Parcells as a GM leaves a lot to be desired, if this year is any
indicator.  Parcells as a coach will build contenders.


What the Pats need is the personnel to make the plan work.  Can Bill be trusted
to get that personnel?  I dunno.

I know one thing:  Bill alone doesn't appear to have the GM skills, but then
again, since Bill left New York, George Young has been more like Curley of the
Three Stooges than a Super Bowl-builder GM.....

Go figure.


'Saw  

56.2134ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 04 1995 17:134
56.2135WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Dec 04 1995 17:1636
    
    > Actually, "Stodgy Bill" took his team to the Super Bowl twice and won with a
    > very conservative offense, that drove his fans nuts sometimes, but it was
    > a conservative offense that out-executed the opposition.
    
    Oh, was Bill GM there, too?  NOT!  In fact, if I remember correctly,
    most of his "most wanted picks" were overridden by the GM, with 
    those new players actually doing MVP work most of the year.
    
    Bill as coach *could* work maybe.  Maybe!  I'm sick of hearing about
    what he did in NY, though, under very tight restraint.  Here, with
    full power to do it his way, he's just going backwards.
    
    > But, in the northeast, in December, you're not really going to see a whole
    > lotta "Air Coryell" getting a lot of success.
    
    No one's asking for that!  Trust me, not with Drew's INT rate!
    
    > I've seen it produce two Super Bowl rings.
    
    Yeah, yeah.  Chemistry of all the pieces in that puzzle had nothing to
    do with it.  It was all Bill. 
    
    > What has shut that down Coates this year is the lack of other stuff to go to.
    
    So what if there was?  Drew doesn't look for the other stuff.  He
    follows his primary and maybe 10% of the time looks for a second
    receiver.  Simms was no Marino, but he was a hell of a lot smarter 
    than Drew.
    
    > What the Pats need is the personnel to make the plan work.  Can Bill be trusted
    > to get that personnel?  I dunno.
    
    Well he can't.  How much more proof is needed?
    
    - Sean
56.2136SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Dec 04 1995 17:2524
RE   <<< Note 56.2135 by WONDER::REILLY "Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375" >>>

>    Bill as coach *could* work maybe.  Maybe!  I'm sick of hearing about
>    what he did in NY, though, under very tight restraint.  Here, with
>    full power to do it his way, he's just going backwards.

  Remember, he went forward before he went backward. This team was winning
an average of 2 games a year before Kraft and Parcells took over. He's been
going steadily forward ever since and now he's had one year of moving back.
If they keep up 2 years forward 1 year back that will get them there in the
long run.
    
>    So what if there was?  Drew doesn't look for the other stuff.  He
>    follows his primary and maybe 10% of the time looks for a second
>    receiver.  Simms was no Marino, but he was a hell of a lot smarter 
>    than Drew.
    
  I think what they are referring to is the fact that even from play to play
Bledsoe doesn't have any where else to go. The teams can cover Coats like
a blanket on every play because they know if anyone else is #1 or #2 on a
play they won't hold on to the ball. With Turner running out of the backfield
the linebackers had to be a bit more careful.

  George
56.2137MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 04 1995 17:3914
    
      Sean, who works two aisles over from me, isn't exactly correct
     when he says that Coates won't be going to the Pro Bowl this year.
     Though his numbers aren't as high as last year when set a record
     for receptions by a tight end they are still good enough to have 
     him amongst the top 2 for tight ends. And that's with the extra
     attention he's been given by defenses all season. And George is
     misinterpreting the part about Drew not going anywhere else. Drew
     locks on to receivers. It's a bad habit he's always had and some-
     thing he occasionally gets away with because of his strong arm.
     The play that sealed our fate was as example of a play where he 
     didn't get away with it. The play looked like it was designed 
     for Coates, Drew locked onto Coates and the threw it despite the
     fact that Coates was covered. 
56.2138OLD1S::CADZILLA2Ain't this boogie a messMon Dec 04 1995 17:489
    
    
    	I would like to bring up one point. It takes an average of five
    years for a QB to learn how to read defenses and the various coverage
    techniques being used. The better Qb's we have today started in much
    the same manner as Bledsoe. Poor TD to Int ratio, not knowing how too
    look off the prime target, throwing into double coverage etc;, give the
    kid a chance.  He'll pan out or they'll run him off like they did
    Plunkett. 
56.2139SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Dec 04 1995 18:0113
  I understand that he's having problems looking for a 2nd or 3rd receiver.

  However there's another reason the defense can double team Coates and doesn't
have to worry about other receivers. They can double team Coates because they
know that if someone else is selected as the primary receiver and if that
primary receiver gets open and if Bledsoe throws there, the guy will probably
drop the ball anyway.

  Last year they couldn't double team Coates so freely because someone like
Turner might have gotten selected as the primary receiver, gotten open and
caught the ball.

  George
56.2140thanks for making my pointWONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Dec 04 1995 18:223
    
    :^)  yeah, someone like Turner  :^)
    
56.2141CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Dec 05 1995 11:5788
|    > Actually, "Stodgy Bill" took his team to the Super Bowl twice and won with a
|    > very conservative offense, that drove his fans nuts sometimes, but it was
|    > a conservative offense that out-executed the opposition.
|    
|    Oh, was Bill GM there, too?  NOT!  In fact, if I remember correctly,
|    most of his "most wanted picks" were overridden by the GM, with 
|    those new players actually doing MVP work most of the year.
|    
|    Bill as coach *could* work maybe.  Maybe!  I'm sick of hearing about
|    what he did in NY, though, under very tight restraint.  Here, with
|    full power to do it his way, he's just going backwards.
    

Jeez, Sean, read the NOTE before you reply.

Did I say Bill was GM in NY?  (Hint: No)

Did I question Bill's abilities as a GM in my note (Hint: Yes)



|    > But, in the northeast, in December, you're not really going to see a whole
|    > lotta "Air Coryell" getting a lot of success.
|    
|    No one's asking for that!  Trust me, not with Drew's INT rate!

Bledsoe is a helluva lot better than some other young QBs.  Would you have
rather had Mirer?  Or better yet, Dave Brown?
    
It's rare that a QB hits the NFL and can read defenses, can not lock onto the
receiver he wants, can see beyond the receivers hand to the DB who'll step
into the gap and make the INT.

I saw Steve Young do a masterful job of faking out the Buffalo defense with
his eyes the other night.  He wanted Rice on the right badly, so the entire
time until he threw, he was looking left.  That's a learned skill.




|    > I've seen it produce two Super Bowl rings.
|    
|    Yeah, yeah.  Chemistry of all the pieces in that puzzle had nothing to
|    do with it.  It was all Bill. 
    
No one said it was all Bill, but ask any of the players from that time, and
believe me, I've read a lot of their books, and the thing that they credit the
most was Parcells -- Parcells driving them, Parcells motivating them, Parcells
berating them....



|    > What has shut that down Coates this year is the lack of other stuff to go to.
|    
|    So what if there was?  Drew doesn't look for the other stuff.  He
|    follows his primary and maybe 10% of the time looks for a second
|    receiver.  Simms was no Marino, but he was a hell of a lot smarter 
|    than Drew.

Yeah, and how much of the Giants did you watch, say, from 79 to 83?
Are you familiar with Phil Simms early career?  Phil made some of the dumbest
mistakes I'd seen -- either that or he was injured.

Simms played until he was 38 years old, and his best years were from 5 years
in the league on.  It takes a LONG time to learn to be a good QB in the NFL.
IF you have the arm.

I just wish Dave Brown had an arm.



    
|    > What the Pats need is the personnel to make the plan work.  Can Bill be trusted
|    > to get that personnel?  I dunno.
|    
|    Well he can't.  How much more proof is needed?
    
He can't now.  Course, he might learn, he might not.  It depends.

I wouldn't write him off just yet.  Why do I say that?  Because in his first
and third years in New York I was saying the same things that you are now.
The same exact things....


'Saw



56.2142of course he had some decent teammates....LANDO::FARLEYTue Dec 05 1995 12:4611
    
    	Yabbut,
    Methinks that it didn't take Broadway Joe too many years to become
    a_excellent Q back.
    Am I right?
    
    I remain,
    maybe doin a bit o' ~/~  
    ;^)
    kev
    
56.2143CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Dec 05 1995 12:5310
Hey, there ARE guys who step right in and get it done, but not many.

On the whole, especially today I think, you have to plan on a QB taking some
time.  IMO, the ideal situation is to plan properly (as best you can of course)
and have your young stud being groomed by your cagey veteran.  Don't always
happen that way in this day and age of the salary cap (qv. Dave Brown and Phil
Simms)


'Saw
56.2144TWIZZL::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Tue Dec 05 1995 16:126
    
    	Lets all remember that Steve Young couldn't cut it in Tampa Bay.
    How many years was Steve Young in the league before replacing Montana?
    I would have to say 5 or 6 years.
    
    Ron
56.2145After beating Bills in snow at FenwayAKOCOA::BREENTue Dec 05 1995 18:559
    It took Namath less than one year.  He beat the Patriots in the last
    game of the 66(?) season to cost them the AFL east championship.  Not
    that they would have beaten K.C. and advanced to the Superbowl (thanks
    Joe).
    
    There was just no stopping him that game, of course that was the
    future sb team
    
    
56.2146WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Dec 05 1995 23:347
    
    Yeah, yeah, yeah, but *supposedly* we're paying Drew as the highest
    paid QB ever for some reason.  If it's to "take as long" as everybody
    else to mature, I'm sorry, I don't get it.
    
    Isn't the extra money supposed to result in extra performance?
    
56.2147Lighten up FrancisFABSIX::E_MAXWELLThe Land Of The Stainless MaidenWed Dec 06 1995 03:5314
     I was there, the only thing you can blame Bledsoe for is trying
    to force something that just wasn't there. The defense, if you
    can call it that, gave up 3, +60 yard touchdowns! Yeah, let's 
    give up on Drew you fair-weather fans. I witnesses Ty Law on one
    of those T.D.'s jogging across the field to try to cut the guy off,
    JOGGING! Then he got popped and everybody cried clip. The D sucked 
    as a complete unit sunday plain and simple. Martin is one hell of
    a rookie huh? If his game faulters next year I can't wait to hear
    you guys cut him to pieces!:-) 
    
                                               1 more to got to!
    
                                                        Lil Ed
    
56.2148desire problem more than a talent problemAKOCOA::BREENWed Dec 06 1995 12:488
    what often happens on those cold December days is one team wants it and
    comes on strong physically in the 4th quarter and for the other the
    cold and the hitting wear it down and it shows in pursuit and tackling.
    
    I was just surprised that the second team would be the Patriots.  That
    never happened with Grogan and Nelson and Hannah: They lost for
    inexplicable reasons and generally poor coaching but were usually
    coming on at the end.
56.2149Not all of 'em are running a flatline but......AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherWed Dec 06 1995 14:387
    
    
    
      But the three you mentioned Bill had more heart than any 10 of these
    combined.  For some reason I don't see Nellie jogging after anyone.
    
    Jerry
56.2150MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Dec 06 1995 15:2315
      The worst part about this Patriots team is that after
     last year there were a lot of high hopes around here.
     I know I got suckered into it all. Who knew that one 
     year later we'd be looking at a team that looks like 
     it needs a major overhaul at least defensively and a heart 
     transplant? Whereas last year we looked to be a couple 
     of years from winning the AFC and going to the SB, now 
     we're back in the pack with a half dozen also-rans with 
     the same prospects for the future. There's way too much
     broke with this defense to fix it in one off-season. And
     with Parcells recent record as a GM, I don't think he has
     what it takes to get it done anyways. This season is a bust
     and if Parcells keeps both jobs next year will be a bust, 
     too.
56.2151MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longA day in infamyWed Dec 06 1995 15:309
  >  And with Parcells recent record as a GM, I don't think he has
  >  what it takes to get it done anyways. This season is a bust
  >  and if Parcells keeps both jobs next year will be a bust, too.

	I couldn't agree with you more.  That's a shame, too.
	I, like many others, was expecting much more this year.


	billl
56.2152OLD1S::CADZILLA2Ain't this boogie a messWed Dec 06 1995 15:395
    
    From what I seem to remember, the Pats had a major defensive overhaul
    this year and that the problem they now face. They let the defense
    that kept them in the hunt last year go to the FA market and lost
    some key players.
56.2153Are they really that bad ..MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Dec 06 1995 16:3915
    Are they really in that much trouble defensivly ?  11 of there 16 games
    were vs opponents who will more then likely be in the Playoffs, 5 of
    those were vs teams that will win there divisions (KC, BUF(2), SF,
    PITT).  So this was a tough schedule, they lost some guys (Off/Def) and
    then lost there best DB (Released) ?  They have the QB, RB, TE and just
    need a WR (Also have a K).  So there offense is on schedule.  The LB's
    are great and just need 1 or 2 more Defensive players and there in
    there.  Give them a year after that to gell and they'll be contenders.
    
    Now what will happen, the $$$ wont be spent we'll lose some names to
    free agency and we'll end up never improving and them the Owners
    will demand a better stadium and then the team will move in 1998 and
    become the West Virina Patriots or something...
    
    								mab
56.2154Time to trade DrewTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Wed Dec 06 1995 16:407
    How much could the Pats get for Bledsoe in a trade?  How about to the
    Jets for Hugh Douglas, Marvin Jones, a defensive lineman, and a #1
    draft choice, which the Pats use to take Keyshawn Johnson from USC.
    
    Wouldn't the Pats be much better if they made that deal?
    
    NAZZ
56.2155WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Dec 06 1995 16:429
    
    Like Ron Borges said in the Globe, the Pats are just a bunch of
    players, not a team.  Last season, they had a team, a team that needed
    help, but a team.  They had confidence and chemistry.  This season, they've 
    just got a bunch of players, largely due to Bill Parcells' wreckless
    dismantling of the heart and soul of this team (Goad, Turner, Timpson,
    Hurst) and the bringing in of overpriced FA mercenaries.
    
    - Sean
56.2156AKOCOA::BREENWed Dec 06 1995 16:473
    It seems they really missed Goad in the middle.  Parcells was looking
    at contending with the big offensive linemen and gambled with Reggie
    White and ended up with a lesser defense than last year.
56.2157WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Dec 06 1995 17:0513
    
    > <<< Note 56.2147 by FABSIX::E_MAXWELL "The Land Of The Stainless Maiden" >>>
    > 
    >  I was there, the only thing you can blame Bledsoe for is trying
    > to force something that just wasn't there.
    
    The only thing?  And you were there?
    
    > can call it that, gave up 3, +60 yard touchdowns! Yeah, let's 
    > give up on Drew you fair-weather fans.
    
    Give up?  First I'd have to start liking him!  In New England, the
    only thing you can be by definition is a bad-weather fan, btw.
56.2158SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Dec 06 1995 18:0817
  Everyone seems down on Bledsoe. If Bledsoe is so terrible, why was he in the
pro-bowl last year? Do they make a practice of having bad players in that
game? Much of the season Bledsoe had no time to throw and when he did hit
someone in the numbers they dropped the ball. Is that his fault? 

  Ok, so he's not that great at hitting a 3rd or 4th target but if he had
some time for plays to develop and if his 1st or 2nd target could hang on to
the ball he wouldn't need to be scrambling around trying to hit the water
boy on a busted play.

  The Patriots made steady progress under Parcells before this year and no one
complained. Now they've had one bad year partly due to a tougher schedule and
everyone wants to pull the chain. I say give'em a 2nd chance. If they end up
losing again next year then maybe it's time to start thinking of new coaches
and quarterbacks. 

  George
56.2159MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Dec 06 1995 18:3417
  >> If Bledsoe is so terrible, why was he in the pro-bowl last year? 

     That's a question a lot of folks were asking last year because
     his TD/INT ratio was horrible. The drops have been infuriating this
     year but they're fixable and they're not the entire reason why Drew
     has the worst completion percentage in the league. The kid just makes
     really awful decisions like the game clincher againt NO. There are
     no excuses for that play. And it really wasn't atypical of Drew be-
     cause he's made bad decisions at critical junctures of games all 
     season long. And we're not just talking poor throws but fundamental 
     calls that high school QBs should be know. Right now with his lack 
     of mobility, his poor decisions and his stretches where he just throws
     very poorly, he's a liability but his upside potential is such that
     you have to ride it out with him. For now.

    
56.2160SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Dec 06 1995 18:4014
  Could be psychological. Considering his age maybe his frustration level is
up and he's showing effects from getting pressured more than he should during
a game. If he had a bit more time to stand in the pocket and if guys would
start catching the ball that could build up his confidence and maybe his
concentration would improve.

  And maybe not but it seems a lot of guys are giving up on him without trying
to see what happens if other fixable problems are addressed.

  By the way, in spite of the fact that the season is toast there is a possible
silver lining. If the Patriots beat the Jets they will be 4-0 against New York
teams this year. At least that would be something.

  George
56.2161MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longA day in infamyWed Dec 06 1995 20:3115
	The thing that has bothered me about Bledsoe from day
	one is his EXTREME lack of mobility.  This guy makes
	'Saw seem fleet-of-foot.

	How does a 6'5" (I think) quarterback not made a first
	down on a 3rd and less than one?  I mean it doesn't
	take a rocket sceintist to figure out that if you 
	follow the center and DRIVE your freakin' legs you 
	will 'almost' always get a yard.  Bledsoe has yet to
	be able to pull off this highly technical manuver.




	billl
56.2162SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Dec 07 1995 11:0819
RE   <<< Note 56.2161 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "A day in infamy" >>>

>	How does a 6'5" (I think) quarterback not made a first
>	down on a 3rd and less than one?  

  1). If the coach doesn't call that play

  2). If the Center gets driven backwards by the defense.

  There are a couple, take your pick.

  Why didn't many people notice how wanting Bledsoe and Parcells were last year
during the 7 game winning streak when they ran the table to take the 2nd wild
card spot in the playoffs? 

  Who picks the guys for the pro-bowl anyway and why are they so much more
stupid than the guys who write in this file?

  George
56.21632 sense worthGIAMEM::HOVEYThu Dec 07 1995 12:1113
    
    	I don't think Bledsoe is an athlete in the true sense. He's a young
    man who can throw a football a zillion miles an hour. He'll never be
    able to run like a Grogan. No one on this planet ever made more stupid 
    decisions than Grogan. He was God awful in plenty of games.
    Lack of mobility is a trait of most Q.B.'s with the exception of the 
    Young's and Mirer's, but most like Marino have the knack of avoiding the 
    rush or getting rid of the ball. Remember towards the end of last year 
    Bledsoe was at least dumping the ball, this year for some reason his 
    confidence is really shot (maybe getting blind-sided helps) 
        I think with a good team this kid would really shine, still make
    mistakes but still make great throws. The team is lousy in so many
    areas that one individual can't shine.
56.2164MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Dec 07 1995 12:3516
>	How does a 6'5" (I think) quarterback not made a first
>	down on a 3rd and less than one?  

  >> 1). If the coach doesn't call that play

  >> 2). If the Center gets driven backwards by the defense.

  >> There are a couple, take your pick.

     Have you seen Bledsoe try to run the QB sneak? I take it by 
     your reply that you haven't because he runs it like monkeys 
     play the piano. No one wants or expects Bledsoe to be the
     second coming of Bobby Douglas but you'd really like to think
     that under extreme circumstances he could tuck it and run. He
     can't. 
    
56.2165SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Dec 07 1995 13:069
  And when he does run does he look like the afore mentioned musical primate as
he tries to run through large gaping holes opened by the offensive line or is
he trying to claw his way through the defense while being careful not to step
on his own guys who are flat on their back?

  I agree this guy is not the 2nd coming but for a young guy he's had some
success when surrounded by a better team (or at least a team playing better). 

  George
56.2166MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Dec 07 1995 13:4315
>> And when he does run does he look like the afore mentioned musical 
>> primate as he tries to run through large gaping holes opened by the 
>> offensive line or is he trying to claw his way through the defense 
>> while being careful not to step on his own guys who are flat on their 
>> back?

    Haven't been watching very many games, have you? It's obvious that
    you haven't or you would have known that Bledsoe was a Pro Bowler
    last year. There aren't any 'large gaping holes' on the QB sneak.
    Drew Bledsoe's own unique interpretation of the QB sneak is to turn 
    his right shoulder away from the defense, tuck his head and make little 
    tiny baby steps that might actually move a sheet hanging out on the 
    line to dry if the wind was right but it is pathetically ineffective 
    against your average defender.
    
56.2167SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Dec 07 1995 14:2812
  The offensive line can make a QB sneak work by pushing the defense back or
by knocking them down so the QB can dive over the top. If they get pushed
back by the defense it doesn't matter much what type of steps the QB makes,
he's probably not going to get very far.

  If this is something he needs to learn here he can probably pick that up in
time. Maybe they would rather have him concentrate on other problem areas
rather than working on running in a crowd right now. In any case saying he
can't push the defensive line back when his offensive line has already failed
at that doesn't make him a poor quarterback. 

  George 
56.2168CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Dec 07 1995 14:362
    
    no it doesn't but his mind does.......
56.2169MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Dec 07 1995 14:5112
    
    >> In any case saying he can't push the defensive line back when his 
    >> offensive line has already failed at that doesn't make him a poor 
    >> quarterback. 

       Who said all that? I don't expect him to push an entire d-line back
       by himself. It'd be nice if he could feel the soft spot in the def-
       ense and push just enough to get the first down yardage though. Un-
       fortunately his execution is just awful and gives him/us no chance.
       You'd agree if you ever saw him attempt it. It's ugly but it's just 
       another one of those little things that should be intuitive that he 
       just doesn't do well and might not ever. 
56.2170SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Dec 08 1995 16:277
  Ok here we go, a win against the Jets and the Pats go 4-0 for the season
against New York teams. 

  Looks like we'll get to see what these teams are made of. The forecast is
for extremely cold weather.

  George
56.2171MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Dec 08 1995 17:0412
    GERAT FOOTBALL WEEKEND... Get Baltimore at Minny on saturday (12:30)
    and then Arz at SD at 4 on saturday... Then 3 more games on sunday !!
    The Question is will the Pats be the only game on at 1 on sunday ?
    Dallas AT Philly is listed as a 1PM Start time ?  Pittsburg @Oakland 
    for the 4pm game...  And a GREAT MNF Game...
    As a PATS fan I don't want to role over and call them dead until the
    heart has stopped pumping but I think Oak, Indy and Miami will be the
    WC teams (I could live without Miami but Hope INDY makes it).
    
    GO PATS :-) (Ya just never know)
    
    							mab
56.2172you call 20 cold?AKOCOA::BREENFri Dec 08 1995 17:495
    okay I'll bite, what do you call extremely cold weather, George?  I say
    single digits and under, straight farenheit with wind as a second
    number - none of this wind chill baloney.
    
    After last week I don't think this is a cold weather Pats team.
56.2173SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Dec 08 1995 18:3112
  Well I guess cold is relative. People who work with liquid Hydrogen think
liquid Nitrogen is life in the tropics. 

  Yeah, wind chill is real. If it's 20 with a 25 mph wind and a wind chill down
around zero that should feel a whole lot like playing at zero degrees. And
after the snow that's suppose to come tomorrow slipping on 20 degrees ice
shouldn't be a whole lot different than slipping on 0 degrees ice. 

  Forecast is for cold, about as cold as football gets with a few notable
exceptions. 

  George 
56.2174JMHOAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherFri Dec 08 1995 18:5112
    
    
     Told myself I wouldn't do this but......George you could not have
    watched many Pats games 'cause you got the sneak all wrong.  You will
    never ever get it going straight over the center.  Which is what Drew
    does every time the play is called.  You have to slide inbetween one
    of the gaurds.  Havin a big ole NT push the center back is actually 
    not that bad on sneak.  Usually if that happens the QB slides right
    by him for the 1ft he needs for the 1st down.  Drew OTOH gets T-Rex 
    arms and goes right over the center for a loss of 1.
    
    Jerry
56.2175SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Dec 08 1995 19:0713
RE<<< Note 56.2174 by AD::HEATH "The albatross and whales they are my brother" >>>
    
>     Told myself I wouldn't do this but......George you could not have
>    watched many Pats games 'cause you got the sneak all wrong.  You will
>    never ever get it going straight over the center.  

  Joke, right?

  If my view of a sneak is the mistaken way the Patriots run it, how does that
prove that I don't watch them play? More likely that proves that I am watching
them play instead of watching someone who runs the play correctly.

  George
56.2176MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 11 1995 13:4837
    
  >> If my view of a sneak is the mistaken way the Patriots run it, 
    
     Judging by the questions you ask, you don't really have a view.
     I'd guess by your responses that you really haven't seen Drew
     try and run the sneak. Have you? 
    
    
     In other news...
          
           Drew was 11 for 36 yesterday. Dropped passes were a small
           part of the problem but has anyone out there ever seen a
           QB that had as many of his passes tipped as Bledsoe does?
           He has to avergae close to five a game and it's probably
           a function of him telegraphing where he's going to throw.
           Yet another thing to work on.
           
           Curtis Martin continues to be the biggest and often the only
           reason to watch this team. If the Patsies can get some speed
           at WR next year we'll have the makings of a very nice offense
           because Martin is a keeper.
    
           Burned by the big play yet again yesterday. Is Al Groh's system
           so complex that these guys just can't figure out their assignments
           on a given play or are they just inept? Take away the exceptional
           special teams play by Meggett and the one play by Brown and we
           lose this game.
    
           We need real help on the d-line. Even against an o-line as inept
           as the Jets' we had to bring numbers to get to Boomer. Willie 
           McGinest is a bust. He'll shine against a non-blocking tight
           end but just about any offensive lineman in the league could
           handle him one-on-one making Chris Slade a marked man. The
           Pats need wide receiver help number one and d-line help number
           two and not in the form of the wrong Reggie White or William 
           Roberts this time.
    
56.2177OLD1S::CADZILLA2My python boot is to tightMon Dec 11 1995 13:594
    
    
    He gets passes knocked down because of that Bernie Kosar side arm
    throwing motion. 
56.2178WRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatMon Dec 11 1995 14:1315
RE: knocked-down passes

I think the reason for the alarming number of knocked down passes is more the
former (telegraphed passes, .2175) than the latter (throwing motion, .2176). The
first personnel priority for this team should not be a wide receiver or
defensive lineman. It should be someone who can teach Bledsoe how to look off
his receivers before throwing to them.

He never seems to look for the second (or third option). If his primary receiver
is covered, he either a) throws into the coverage anyway or b) throws the ball
away (i.e. rarely looks for another alternative). A good example was when he
threw the ball away on a covered screen to MArtin (or was it Meggett) while not
even bothering to look at a WIDE OPEN Ben Coates 15 yards down the middle.

Chris
56.21792 sense worthGIAMEM::HOVEYTue Dec 12 1995 12:068
    
    	It could also be the O'line not doing their jobs. If they give up
    penetration it's fairly easy for a lineman ,  6'2 to 6'5 tall to
    knock down a pass. The D' ends should cut down on some plays. 
        You can't pinpoint one or two problems on this team. It's a whole
    lotta problems that's the cauuse of their demise as well as a tougher
    schedule.
        
56.2180SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Dec 12 1995 12:2620
RE         <<< Note 56.2176 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>     Judging by the questions you ask, you don't really have a view.
>     I'd guess by your responses that you really haven't seen Drew
>     try and run the sneak. Have you? 
    
  Clearly you are not watching any of the games (I guess this is the new way
we say "I disagree" in the SPORTS notes file. Weird).

RE The game

  That was one ugly game. Both sides tried hard to lose but the Jets got an
antimatter, Shafer stroke victory and came up with the loss.

  In a year with not much to cheer about the Patriots are 4-0 against New
York teams and 5-2 in their division. Of course their record out of New York
and out of the division is better thought of as room for improvement next
year.

  George
56.2181Six players short of a title - five on defenseTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Tue Dec 12 1995 13:1010
    Defense needs a complete revamping.  I would keep the linebackers
    (despite a horrible year from Chris Slade) and the cornerbacks, and
    jettison the rest of the starters.  I might keep Ferric Collons and
    Troy Barnett, as they are good backups.  As are Whigham and Lewis in
    the backfield.  
    
    But the Pats need a dominating noseguard, two defensive ends, and two
    safeties.  Not to mention a big-play wide receiver.
    
    NAZZ
56.2182MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Dec 12 1995 13:177
    
    >> Clearly you are not watching any of the games (I guess this 
    >> is the new way we say "I disagree" in the SPORTS notes file. Weird).

       And this must be the new SPORTS notesfile way of saying, "No, I 
       haven't actually seen him attempt it." 
    
56.2183These two have been bugging meBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Dec 12 1995 13:4014
    <<< Note 56.2180 by SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" >>>


>  Clearly you are not watching any of the games (I guess this is the new way
>we say "I disagree" in the SPORTS notes file. Weird).

	Hey, at least it's better than the Digital way of saying "I disagree".
	I don't know how many times I've heard someone respond with "I don't
	disagree with your statement, but .....".  Then they go on to disagree.
	And people are still saying "so and so got TFSO'd" instead of saying
	the truth, which is "so and so got laid off".

	Kevin
	
56.2184Change in scheme neededCSLALL::BRULEcountry in need of a leaderTue Dec 12 1995 14:4710
    Maybe what the Pats need is to change to a 4-3 defense. More and more
    teams are going to the 4-3 because of the lack of pass rushers. More
    and more offenses now use the short passing game which require QB's to
    only drop back 5 steps instead of seven which means less time for
    someone to come from the outside. So if you put 2 300lb tackles
    pushing up the middle instead of one 300lb noseman you should get to the
    QB a little quicker or at least get into his face. I think today more
    and more colleges are going away from the 3-4 to a 4 man line. JMHO
    
    Mike
56.2185SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Dec 12 1995 16:428
RE         <<< Note 56.2182 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>       And this must be the new SPORTS notesfile way of saying, "No, I 
>       haven't actually seen him attempt it." 
    
  You must never enter any notes because I did see him try it.

  George
56.2186MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Dec 12 1995 18:478
    
  >> because I did see him try it.

     Then why did you ask what the game situations were? Or say that
     *maybe* it's something he needs to work on? *If* you'd actually
     seen him attempt it you'd know what the game situations were and
     that it's just something he does poorly and needs to work on.
    
56.2187SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Dec 12 1995 18:5815
RE         <<< Note 56.2186 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>     Then why did you ask what the game situations were? Or say that
>     *maybe* it's something he needs to work on? *If* you'd actually
>     seen him attempt it you'd know what the game situations were and
>     that it's just something he does poorly and needs to work on.
    
  You must never log in to your computer account because I don't recall asking
what the game situation was.

  Obviously you try a sneak on short yardage. Not exactly the play to run
on 3rd and long. And I believe I said that the reason they might not work
on it is that they feel other things are more important.

  George
56.2188Bill's already given up on qb sneaks it seemsAKOCOA::BREENTue Dec 12 1995 19:097
    Well they seem to have given up on it.  They had 3rd and inches and
    took a delay of game and punted.  That was from the 45.  Strategy
    worked pretty well, ironic given the Switzer scenario.  Bill had 8
    minutes or so so not exactly a pure comparison.
    
    I think Parcells had no confidence in a sneak.
    
56.2189MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Dec 12 1995 19:179
    
  >> You must never log in to your computer account because I 
  >> don't recall asking what the game situation was.

     In .2165 you ask what the blocking looked like. 'Are there
     huge gaping holes etc. etc.?' On a QB sneak? The Patriots?
     Not likely. And not a question that I'd expect from someone
     that has seen him attempt it.
     
56.2190SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Dec 13 1995 14:3218
RE         <<< Note 56.2189 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>     In .2165 you ask what the blocking looked like. 'Are there
>     huge gaping holes etc. etc.?' On a QB sneak? The Patriots?
>     Not likely. And not a question that I'd expect from someone
>     that has seen him attempt it.
     
  You must never drive your car to work.

  Regardless of how you run the sneak, if their line is pushing your line
back even if you get through the "soft" spot you end up getting crunched
before you get back to the line of scrimmage.

  No running game works with any consistency with the offensive line going
backwards and defenders are in the offensive backfield regardless if it's a
sneak, a regular run, or some sort of draw or reverse. 

  George
56.2191MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Dec 13 1995 15:2817

 >> No running game works with any consistency with the offensive 
 >> line going backwards and defenders are in the offensive backfield 

    Uh, George? The Pats have a back on the verge of breaking the team
    rushing record but you knew that because you're a big Pats fan. His 
    name is Curtis Martin, btw. The problem isn't/wasn't the line. That's 
    just another excuse. The problem is Drew's execution. He's never going 
    to get it done with his head tucked down as if he believes that what he 
    can't see can't hurt him. He's goes about it far too timidly. The bad 
    throwing year I think you can pass off as a bad year and poor receiving 
    talent. It's the big mental lapses and the seeming lack of heart as ev-
    idenced by the way he runs the ball that worry me. He's in the NFL and
    a monster arm isn't enough to get it done anymore. He has to bring more
    to the table than that and right now he doesn't seem like he's able.
    
56.2192SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Dec 13 1995 15:4226
RE         <<< Note 56.2191 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

  At the risk of using the old terminology I'll just say I disagree. 

  If there is one thing different about the NFL it is that Quarter Backs who
run don't have very long careers. If he can't run so what, don't call that
play. 

  Remember how McMann was once the best Quarterback in the league? When he was
health and running the Bears couldn't lose. When he went down with injuries
they became just another good team. 

  Greg Landry was an incredible quarterback at UMASS and running was a big part
of his game but when he got to Detroit he quickly learned that when QB's run in
the NFL as Frank Gifford would say "the defense sends someone out to separate
the helmet from the shoulders". 

  Sure it would be nice if he could run the sneak and some day maybe he will
learn that but there are more important things for him to learn right now like
keeping his head in the game when things are going to hell and not losing his
confidence when receivers start dropping the ball. 

  He showed last year that he had potential, I think this year is the exception
and it's mostly mental. He'll be back.

  George
56.2193MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Dec 13 1995 15:5819
  >> If there is one thing different about the NFL it is that Quarter 
  >> Backs who run don't have very long careers. 

     Steve Young, Joe Montana, Roger Staubach, Terry Bradshaw even Jim
     Kelly and Warren Moon can tuck it under and run if they have to.
     And it's really not even a matter of being able to run per se.
     It's having the smarts and/or instinct to find where the defense is
     vulnerable and the courage and strength to cram your way in their
     and get the necessary yardage. He doesn't do that right now. Plays
     that should have been automatic were drive killers.

  >> Remember how McMann was once the best Quarterback in the league? 

     It's McMahon and I think you and Jim are the only ones who remember 
     him being the best QB in the league. Jim was always "adequate" never 
     the best in the league. Chicago's strength was its defense and its
     running game.
    
56.2194not to speak of GroganAKOCOA::BREENWed Dec 13 1995 16:0812
    One thing about Bledsoe even in the pure quarterbacking sense is his
    touch on the long pass.  This was a given when he was drafted and from
    the little I saw of him in college seemed to be one of his strong
    points.  But game to game he's showing an inability to connect on the
    long pass.  In fact does anyone recall any long bombs from him this
    year?
    
    Basically I'm talking about the kind of pass with a length of 40-45+
    and has some kind of arc.  Almost every quarterback who could be
    considered "great" was able to lay it in long: two of the best were
    Jurgenson and Unitas.  In fact Bradshaw of the Steelers possessed this
    talent to a high degree.
56.2195SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Wed Dec 13 1995 16:467
    
    	Jim McMahon didn't get injured from running with the ball. One
    of the DL's from Green Bay. Picked him up and slammed down on his
    shoulder. Well after the play was over. There was a flag and the player
    was fined. McMahon was never the same afterwards.
    
    Ron
56.2196SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Dec 13 1995 18:1927
RE         <<< Note 56.2193 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>     It's McMahon and I think you and Jim are the only ones who remember 
>     him being the best QB in the league. Jim was always "adequate" never 
>     the best in the league. Chicago's strength was its defense and its
>     running game.
    
  Back around '85 when McMahon played the Bears were unbeatable. When he
didn't play they were still a really good team but no longer in a league
by themselves.

RE                      <<< Note 56.2194 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    One thing about Bledsoe even in the pure quarterbacking sense is his
>    touch on the long pass.  This was a given when he was drafted and from
>    the little I saw of him in college seemed to be one of his strong
>    points.  But game to game he's showing an inability to connect on the
>    long pass.  In fact does anyone recall any long bombs from him this
>    year?
    
  This could be due to lack of confidence. It would also have to do with not
having much time to stand around in the pocket letting long pass patterns
develop.

  Both problems can be fixed.

  George
56.2197MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Dec 13 1995 19:0814
    
  >> Back around '85 when McMahon played the Bears were unbeatable. 
  >> When he didn't play they were still a really good team but no 
  >> longer in a league by themselves.

     By that logic Bob Griese was the best QB in the league the year
     the Dolphins went undefeated. We all know that he wasn't. The
     Dolphins were great for the same reason the Bears were great
     - a great defense and a great running game. The decline of
     the Bears was due more to the departure of Buddy Ryan and Wilbur
     Marshall than any injury to McMahon. McMahon's been to a few places
     since he left the Bears and never came close to duplicating the
     success that he had with the Bears.     
    
56.2198SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Dec 13 1995 19:4110
  As someone said, since his injury he hasn't been the same.

  But when he was with the Bears he was great. He not only threw, he ran. And
by that I mean he really ran, like a running back, not like most of the Quarter
Backs today who slide at the 1st sign of danger.

  And the glasses. No one argued with Ditka or wore sun glasses like he did.

  For a brief time, he was the greatest,
  George
56.2199Certainly no argument from me!EDWIN::WAUGAMANNever make it up to Coeur D'AleneThu Dec 14 1995 12:445
    
>  And the glasses. No one argued with Ditka or wore sun glasses like he did.
    
    ...and there you have it...
    
56.2200Pats SnarfOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Dec 14 1995 13:301
56.2201Grogan>BradshawAKOCOA::BREENThu Dec 14 1995 13:335
    > Dolphins were great for the same reason the Bears were great
    >     - a great defense and a great running game. The decline of
    
    And you could have added Bradshaw and the Steelers.    
    
56.2202SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Dec 14 1995 13:5724
  So if McMahon wasn't that good a Quarter Back why were the Bears so much
better with him than they were without him? From what I saw he looked pretty
good. He threw very well, he ran like a real running back, he was a really good
team leader, he knew when to listen to Ditka and when not to take his Krap,
and the offense really clicked when he was playing. 

  And if you'll remember the Superbowl wasn't exactly a 10-0 game, the Bears
scored a ton of points so it wasn't all defense. 

  Meanwhile back to the Patriots. They need two wins to end up .500 and this
one looks really tough. I'm not sure I agree that the Steelers are a lock for
the Superbowl like they think over in the Steelers note but they are a good
team. It would be a big confidence boost if the Pats could win. 

  On TV this morning they were interviewing Bledsoe and Parcells and asking
them if they were aware if the Patriots were still mathematically alive.
Bledsoe seemed to hum and haw through an answer and Parcells said he had
someone else looking into those types of things. 

  If the Pats are still alive I think you'd need differential equations or
maybe even general relativity to ferret out their chances but it would be nice
to see them make a run at .500. It's a long shot but they can do it. 

  George 
56.2203AKOCOA::BREENThu Dec 14 1995 14:0210
    The simplest generalization for playoffs is record vs opposite
    conference.  The Pats have a chance for the same reason that Carolina
    doesn't - losses (victories) against the other conference.
    
    Last year they swept the central and would have been in poor shape on
    tie breakers.
    
    Head to head becomes a problem and precludes conference but it seems
    having a bunch of teams at 8-8 would make conf record the tiebreaker
    and The pats should max that out since they were swept by the nfc-west.
56.2204MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Dec 14 1995 14:0815
  >> So if McMahon wasn't that good a Quarter Back why were the 
  >> Bears so much better with him than they were without him? 

     Like I said before the Bears dynasty that never was faltered
     because Buddy Ryan started reading his press clippings and
     Wilbur Marshall wanted out. McMahon was a gutsy QB but he had
     a below average arm (he was prone to throwing some real wounded
     ducks). He was good in much the same way that Phil Simms was 
     good. Simms took the Giants all the way with only two losses all
     season but no one would proclaim him the greatest though Simms 
     was a much much better thrower than McMahon. Back then Montana, 
     Marino and even Elway were all in their prime and were all better
     than McMahon as were a few other QBs.
    
56.2205SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Dec 18 1995 12:049
  Ouch that hurt. The Pats came soooooooo close. All tied up with one of the
best teams in the conference right down near the end and thunk, the wheels fall
off. What a bumer.

  But in the sliver lining department the Pats did beat the division champs
both times out. Who knows, maybe it will work out that they beat the AFC champs
both times out, the Bills seem to be on a roll. 

  George
56.2206ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Mon Dec 18 1995 12:054
56.2207Anybody got the sevenAKOCOA::BREENMon Dec 18 1995 12:266
    Well Parcells said 38 played great and 7 should have stayed home.
    
    We have Yancy obviously, who are the other 6?  Guyton?
    
    Tackling and pursuit are two problem areas.  That usually translates
    into hustle.
56.2208IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Mon Dec 18 1995 12:4114
>    Well Parcells said 38 played great and 7 should have stayed home.

Probably the 7 ex-Giants (could there be that few? :-)

Definitely a frustrating team to root for and watch.  They're still a wide
receiver and about 3 defensive players (pass rushing lineman, linebacker for
depth, good cover corner) short.

Best thing for the Pats would be if Parcells stayed to coach, but gave up
the GM role.  The only pick that's really panned out in my mind is Martin.

I know I haven't been watching them a lot, but where is Jimmy Hitchcock?  I
would think that this past game and next week, he and Law would be out there
for every defensive play.
56.2209MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 18 1995 13:0917
   >> Who knows, maybe it will work out that they beat the AFC champs
   >> both times out, the Bills seem to be on a roll. 

      I don't know a single Patriots fan who gives a um... crap about
      beating Buffalo twice. It'd mean something if we were going to the
      playoffs and it gave us home field advantage but since we'll be
      watching on tv - big damn deal. If you're a Patriots fan the real
      silver lining is in the form of Coates, Bledsoe and Martin - the
      young core of a potentially great offense. As disappointing as
      this season was we still have these three and a decent offensive
      line. If we can a get a decent deep threat and some secondary
      guys who don't tackle like showgirls then we can make a move as
      early as next year because we do have Coates, Beldose and Martin.
      If Parcells is still enthralled with Giants players then get us 
      Phillippi (sp) Sparks and get rid of Terry Ray and Carlos Yancy.
    
56.2210OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Dec 18 1995 15:202
56.2211AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Dec 18 1995 15:227
    
    
      re -.1
    
      Tommy....I'm tickled pink about beating Baffalo twice.
    
    Jerry
56.2212MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 18 1995 15:2814
    
     >> Tommy....I'm tickled pink about beating Baffalo twice.
    
        Really? I just don't get worked up about Buffalo. I'd
        much rather have beaten the Dolphins twice. When the
        Pats stunk and guys like George couldn't be bothered 
        with them there used to be as many Bills fans as Pats 
        fans in the stands when the Bills came to Foxboro. They
        were enthusiastic though not abrasive. I actually felt
        sorry for them for getting crushed in all of those Super 
        Bowls. The Dolphins are another story. I'd much rather have 
        beaten *them* twice this year. They've always seemed to
        be a thorn in our side.
       
56.2213SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Dec 18 1995 15:3523
RE         <<< Note 56.2212 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>When the
>        Pats stunk and guys like George couldn't be bothered 
>        with them there used to be as many Bills fans as Pats 
>        fans in the stands when the Bills came to Foxboro. 

  The Pats did stink this year and that doesn't bother me a bit. What bothered
me was their habit of doing things like assaulting women in their locker room
and their existing fans reaction which was mocking that same woman with
inflatable dolls. Let me guess, you are one of the ones who was proud to call
yourself a fan back in those days, right? After all abuse is right up your
ally.

>The Dolphins are another story. I'd much rather have 
>        beaten *them* twice this year. They've always seemed to
>        be a thorn in our side.
       
  We might want to look this one up. Seems the Pats have always had their
share of wins against the Dolphins. I'd say it was more the other way around
in that the Dolphins were more often the contender being spoiled by the Pats.

  George
56.2214MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 18 1995 15:4723
  >> The Pats did stink this year and that doesn't bother me a bit. 

     They didn't stink this year. They lost games that they should 
     have won. The Jets - they stink. The Pats just don't have a killer
     instinct. If they stunk you'd not be a Pats fan.

  >> What bothered me was their habit of doing things like assaulting women 
  >> in their locker room

     It was one incident. If one incident can be a "habit" then I guess 
     someone who can't name the Pats offensive and defensive coordinators
     can be a "fan".

  >> We might want to look this one up. Seems the Pats have always had their
  >> share of wins against the Dolphins. 

     I don't have to look it up. I have their entire '85 run to the SB on
     tape including the Matt Millen/Pat Sullivan incident. When the Pats
     went down to the Orange Bowl to beat Miami that year it was the first 
     time in about 19 tries down there. Your frame of reference, as a "fan"
     for all of three years, is far too small.
    
56.2215SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Dec 18 1995 16:0038
Re         <<< Note 56.2214 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>     It was one incident. If one incident can be a "habit" 

  Well, put that one up there along with their GM getting into a brawl with a
Raiders line backer and a few questionable employment practices and things
start adding up.

  But the thing that made it more of an incident was their owner badmouthing
the woman who made the complaint in terms suggesting she deserved what she
got and the fans reaction with the inflatable dolls. Did I want to be any
part of that? No. By the way you still haven't answered my question, did you
think of that as a proud moment?

  Honestly, were you one of the ones in the crowd cheering Victor Kiam when he
made his anti Lisa Olson speeches or were you one of the few booing the clowns
with the inflatable Lisa Olson dolls?

>then I guess 
>     someone who can't name the Pats offensive and defensive coordinators
>     can be a "fan".

  How does knowing the coaching staff make your zeal excessive and irrational?
In fact you seemed to have ducked all those questions I asked about excessive
and irrational behavior. No doubt because you know it completely destroys your
argument. Oops, look out, we're about due for the smoke screen about how I'm
just looking for attention calling you on that point.

>When the Pats
>     went down to the Orange Bowl to beat Miami that year it was the first 
>     time in about 19 tries down there. Your frame of reference, as a "fan"
>     for all of three years, is far too small.
    
  But then the snow plow incident was more of a thorn in the Dalphin's side
than the Patriots side. Maybe we should start looking at your frame of
reference.

  George
56.2216WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Dec 18 1995 16:5013
    
    Parcells, what a class act.  Moaning about 7 who should have stayed
    home and younger guys who "didn't hear the bell."
    
    Bill, how about your overpaid underachieving hand-picked veterans
    not hearing the bell ALL year?
    
    This guy bugs me royal, if couldn't tell. :^)  Scapegoating Yancy,
    thrown into a defense at the last minute to save the season.  
    Has Bill *ever* had a bad thing to say about one of his precious
    pet players?  He's always in CYA mode.
    
    - Sean
56.2217SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Dec 21 1995 13:3713
  Well Saturday night is the last chance for the Pats to have any impact on
this season. They are out of the race and can no longer get into the playoffs 
but they can play the part of spoiler to a certain extent.

  It appears that the Colts might even be able to make the playoffs if they
lose but their odds are better if they beat the Pats.

  For the Patriots they are now 5-2 in their division. A win would make them
6-2 in division play. Last year they feasted on the NFC teams they played, this
year their interconference games were a disaster.

  GO PATS, FINISH WITH A WIN!!!
  George
56.2218:^) grumpy reply followsWONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Dec 21 1995 14:113
    
    Spoiler, schmoiler.  The last vestige of a loser.
    
56.2219CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearThu Dec 21 1995 14:4123
>    
>     Told myself I wouldn't do this but......George you could not have
>    watched many Pats games 'cause you got the sneak all wrong.  You will
>    never ever get it going straight over the center.  Which is what Drew
>    does every time the play is called.  You have to slide inbetween one
>    of the gaurds.  Havin a big ole NT push the center back is actually 
>    not that bad on sneak.  Usually if that happens the QB slides right
>    by him for the 1ft he needs for the 1st down.  Drew OTOH gets T-Rex 
>    arms and goes right over the center for a loss of 1.
>    
>    Jerry


BEST sneak I've seen since Starr decided to hang onto the ball and NOT give it
to Mercein, was the one Steve Young and the AWESOME San Fran O-line ran the
other night against Minny.

The line must've pushed the Minny d-line back about three yards and Young kind
of "snuck" standing up.  It looked for all the world like the ultimate rugby
ruck.....


'Saw
56.2220THE sneakNQOS01::swu0r1.tfo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYThu Dec 21 1995 16:451
still not in the same league as Namath's
56.2221USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Dec 21 1995 16:455
>  It appears that the Colts might even be able to make the playoffs if they
>lose but their odds are better if they beat the Pats.

Yeah, the Colts' odds of getting in are pretty good if they win, since
they are guaranteed of getting in with a win.
56.2222MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonThu Dec 21 1995 16:5613
	The Colts make the playoffs if they win, and they are favored by 6,
	last I saw.

	The Colts are eliminated if they lose and Seattle wins (unlikely,
	as Chiefs are favored by 7 at home against the Seahawks).

	If the Colts and Seattle both lose, the Colts will make the playoffs
	if San Diego, Oakland, or Miami loses (1 of the three).  With Hostetler
	out for Oakland, I'd bet on the Broncos to win.  If the Colts and
	Seattle both lose, and San Diego, Miami, and Oakland all win, the Colts
	are eliminated.

	
56.2223That old Eli manAKOCOA::BREENOh, Come Ollie MatsonThu Dec 21 1995 17:025
    Don't go knocking Chuck Mercein who rose to the occasion on that day
    that had straight fahrenheit numbers and didn't need any faux windchill
    baby numbers to prove to the world that it was cold, damn cold.
    
    Mercein caught and ran the ball as the mainstay of that last drive.
56.2224USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Dec 21 1995 18:529
>    Don't go knocking Chuck Mercein who rose to the occasion on that day
>    that had straight fahrenheit numbers and didn't need any faux windchill
>    baby numbers to prove to the world that it was cold, damn cold.
    
>    Mercein caught and ran the ball as the mainstay of that last drive.


Wasn't it Donny Anderson who tried (3 times) to push it over from the
one and was rejected each time (before "The Sneak") ?
56.2225AKOCOA::BREENOh, Come Ollie MatsonThu Dec 21 1995 19:046
    That could be, Donny was the big star but when the Pack fell behind and
    needed the big drive they relied on Mercein.  Donny was an okay pro but
    not up to his college hype.  Where'd he come from Purdue?,Kansas?SMU?
    
    Who was on the Dallas line trying to stop'em: Lilly, Pugh, that mlb
    from Alabama
56.2226MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Dec 21 1995 19:094
    
      billthe, my erudite friend, I'm sure you can loop this around
     and tie it to the Patriots so as to make this string relevant to
     the title of the basenote.
56.2227And ;that's how we got here from thereAKOCOA::BREENOh, Come Ollie MatsonThu Dec 21 1995 19:4516
    Tommy 56.2219 discussed great sneaks contrasting our beloved Drew's
    nearly universally acknoweldged inability to do same with Bart Starr's
    in 1965 (or was it '66).  Chuck Mercein was on the Pack (and from New
    England - Yale).
    
    I'm hardly erudite btw - I've never read Ulysses nor even Camus'
    Rememberance of Things Past.  I've got the Sound and the Fury in the
    downstairs bathroom and promise to try the first dozen or so pages
    again - the name caddy and the caddies of the nearby golfers confused
    me not to speak of the several passages in time the author goes thru.
    
    	But Pylon turned out worth the effort so I'll probably perservere
    here.  Got that Hans Herlin book for you to swap for a Davies - coming
    to the pool-95 banquet?
    
    
56.2228Parole Tide!GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Thu Dec 21 1995 20:2617
    
    Re. MLB for the Cowboys
    
    	That would be Leroy Jordan.
    
    	Ole Bear Bryant had a good story about Leroy.  Leroy's freshman
    	year at Bama, the good Coach Bryant greeted all of his players
    	on the first day of practice (100+ players).  He told his boys
    	to look down to the other end of the field where there were 10
    	footballs laying on the grass.  He told them to go get him a 
    	football (obviously some sort of toughness test).  Ole Leroy
    	brought him two.......
    
    	You'll have to imagine BB telling this story in his colorful
    	style and gravelly voice.  Classic.
    
    Claybone
56.2229MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Dec 26 1995 13:5614
  >> We might want to look this one up. Seems the Pats have always had their
  >> share of wins against the Dolphins. 

    > I don't have to look it up. I have their entire '85 run to the SB on
    > tape including the Matt Millen/Pat Sullivan incident. When the Pats
    > went down to the Orange Bowl to beat Miami that year it was the first 
    > time in about 19 tries down there. Your frame of reference, as a "fan"
    > for all of three years, is far too small.
    
      I watched a little of the AFC championship game against Miami this
      weekend and I stand corrected. It wasn't 19 straight road losses to
      the Dolphins. It was *only* 18 straight road losses.
    
56.2230Guess I got jump on the Squeelers 'wagonAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Dec 26 1995 14:5612
    
    
      Was it me or did Drew look like he just wanted to get outa there
    Saturday?  That game was VERY winnable down to the last 2 minutes
    but Drew seemed to play like..."Well let me chuck this down field
    into double coverage a couple times so I can get back to Wala Wala"
    Once you can forgive but twice in the last two minutes.  Come on in
    Drew's last three possesions of 1995 he had a fumble and two int's.
    I don't want to go and lable the the guy no heart/gutless whatever
    but that game was well within reach a number of times.
    
    Jerry
56.2231limited field of jumpingHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Dec 26 1995 15:0010
Wail,

It looks like thised week's bandwagon jumpin is gonna be a lot easier. I
mean, hail, they's only 8 teams playing.

Right now, from where I'm sitting, it looks like Detroit, San Diego,
Buffalo or Miami and possibly Green Bay, although I haven't counted out
some of them others....

TTom
56.2232Gotta go with a squad that won 7 in a row and beat the 'Niners...IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Dec 26 1995 15:083
I'm suddenly finding a liking to the Honolulu Blue that the Lions wear - and
feeling superior to the other Lion bandwagon-jumpers for knowing that it's
Honolulu Blue... :-) :-)
56.2233MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Dec 26 1995 15:1118
    
       Drew showed me a little something when he took that hit
      right on the chinstrap and got up like it wasn't anything.
      Still how do you have Ben Coates and Curtis Martin fully 
      involved in the offense and still not be able to score?
      Answer - Graham, Brisby and Lee still dropping passes
      and still unable to get any yardage after the catch and
      Bledsoe still making questionable decisions. I saw in the
      paper where Big Tuna acknowledged that we need d-line and
      wide receiver help. He also ought to acknowledge that the
      guys we had at those spots last year were better than
      this bunch. I'd like to think that the guys Tuna shed last
      year and the one year contract signings have us well poised
      salary capwise and that we're going to make a move but after 
      spending 3 mil for a return man and 1 mil each for career 
      backup d-linemen, I'm a little afraid to think of what he might
      bring home this time. Phillippi Sparks would be nice.
    
56.2234GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Tue Dec 26 1995 15:116
    
    	My sis sent me a Packer hat for Christmas.  Guess I'll be 
    	rootin' for the Pack.......even though they got a_ex Auburn
    	boy for a QB.
    
    Claybone
56.2235Or something like thatHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Dec 26 1995 15:266
re: a_ex Auburn boy for a QB

I thought Favre was from one of them smallish louisiana schools like
Northwestern Southeast Central Louisiana Tech State Institute.

TTom
56.2237IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Dec 26 1995 15:292
Favre is from Southern Mississippi, and *still* can't pronounce his own
name correctly...
56.2238RE: .2234-.2237 - look at those timestamps...IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Dec 26 1995 15:442
Who knew Brett Favre would be such a hot topic amongst Pats fans?
56.2240swooninHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Dec 26 1995 15:554
Karen's just trying to latch on to something since she lost her lead in
da POOL ;-).

TTom
56.2242IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Dec 26 1995 16:023
>    I've got 12 wins thised week so I may have it back...

Well, there's your pick-up line for Brett right there...
56.2243favreiteHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Dec 26 1995 16:093
Are you glad to see me or is that 12 picks in your pool...

TTom
56.2244They'll be 11-5 and back in the 'offs next yearAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Dec 26 1995 16:1625
    
    
      re.. <<< Note 56.2233 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
    
          Thats why I didn't want to call him heartless.  There is no doubt
    that he is a tough kid but it seemed to me he felt it was useless being
    out there and just wanted it over.  Yea Big Tuna all but said he dorked
    things up with he FA signings last year, hopefully he'll get some
    talent evaluation help and put together a solid team for next year.  He
    is a good coach but nobody can do both jobs effectively.  It was good
    to see Harlow back at RT.  I think he is much better than Lane but
    ended up in Tuna's doghouse somehow.  Lane is better than Kratch so
    maybe move Lane to RG with Harlow at RT.  The O-Line showed they can
    play with anyone and with Drew, Coates and ROY (I want to curse him now,
    do not want him to win it for fear he'll end up like Stephens, Russell)
    Martin, add a real #1 WR to the mix and this offense will be just fine.
    The other side of the ball isn't as bad as they played.  Brown will
    have his knee 'scoped and should be 100% by spring, Johnson made some
    rookie mistakes but is a solid player.  Law is not the cover man Hurst
    was, (don't laugh Hurst was a very good cover guy) but is a rookie and
    will get better.  Reynolds ain't bad but is overpaid.  Both safties,
    Ray and especially Guyton have to be replaced.  As does everyone down
    DL'man.  
    
    Jerry
56.2245My post-Christmas wish...IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Dec 26 1995 16:2111
...is that Bill Parcells stays as coach, and that the Patriots hire a
decent GM.  I don't always like Parcells' decisions, but it's obvious that
he's brought a sense of stability and discipline to a franchise that has 
needed it from the word "go".  On the other hand, I occasionally have delusions
that even *I* could do a better job as GM...

Jerry, that Little River Band p-name has *got* to go.  I'm ashamed I even
know who did the song... :-)

-Roland
56.2246OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Dec 26 1995 16:283
56.2247MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Dec 26 1995 16:4117
   >> Law is not the cover man Hurst was, (don't laugh Hurst was a very 
   >> good cover guy) but is a rookie and will get better.  

      Hurst was a good enough cover man to get to the Pro Bowl. Law
      strikes me as a safety not a corner. Except for one poor effort 
      Saturday, he's as sure a tackler as the Pats have in their sec-
      ondary (faint praise, I know). On the plus side, we do have the
      6th or 7th overall pick in the next draft. We should be able
      to fill one of our many needs with that. Keyshawn Johnson the 
      wideout from USC would be nice but he probably won't be there. 
      I don't want Illini linebacker Simeon Rice who probably will be 
      there. After seeing him manhandled by Kyle Brady last year, I ain't 
      at all impressed.
    
      MIkeyH, if you know Phillippi, sell him on playing up here. Please.
    
56.2248SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Tue Dec 26 1995 17:046
    
    	This weekends paper listed Bledsoe, Coates, Vincent Brown, and Max
    Lane. As players who will be having off season surgery. Drews surgery
    will be on his seperated shoulder.
    
    Ron
56.2249GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Tue Dec 26 1995 17:105
    
    	Damn if I'm not wrong again.  All the more reason to root for
    	the Pack!  :^)
    
    Claybone
56.2250AKOCOA::BREENOh, Come Ollie MatsonTue Dec 26 1995 17:169
    That last 3 minutes, in fact the whole fourth quarter had to be the
    craziest segment I've seen since the wacky old days of the Patriots. 
    In fact what WAS a certain stability with Parcells now looks like the
    old days when the Patriots found ways to lose.
    
    Marchibroda had to be wondering a little too seeing a game in the can
    turn into a nail biter.  If I were Kraft I wouldn't encourage Parcells
    to come back.  Perhaps a strong draft and a weak schedule will turn
    things around.
56.2251get some one who eats QBs for breakfast...IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Dec 26 1995 17:1910
>Keyshawn Johnson the 
>      wideout from USC would be nice but he probably won't be there.

Perhaps not, but maybe Terry Glenn will leave early?

Putting on my GM hat, if I've got a choice between a prime wide receiver and a
pass-rushing defensive lineman with bad intentions with my high #1, I'll take
the lineman every time.  I think you can probably get at least a *good* wide
receiver via the free agent market for reasonable money, while a pass-rushing
stud lineman will cost you Reggie White (the *real* Reggie White) bucks.
56.2252OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Dec 26 1995 17:293
56.2253MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Dec 26 1995 17:4810
  >> Perhaps not, but maybe Terry Glenn will leave early?

     I'd like Glenn but don't know if I'd draft him that early.
     If I was going to draft the best player available, I'd take
     Ogden the OL from UCLA. At 6'8" 310, he has the size Parcells
     loves and he's athletic. Unfortunately, he'll probably be gone 
     too because I've heard that this promises to be one of the
     weaker drafts in recent history.
    
56.2254IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Dec 26 1995 18:0210
Supposedly, the 310 lbs. is a little conservative (more like 315 or so), and
he runs a 4.8 40, too.  I can't *drive* the 40 in 4.8...

He's definitely the man if you go for "best available".

If you can't get Keyshawn, you could do worse than taking a flyer on Marvin
Harrison (Syracuse) in one of the later rounds.  In addition to being a decent
wide receiver, he's also an excellent punt returner.

JoeG, am I getting Marvin's name right?  I'm on cold medication...
56.2255This is NFL jeenyus thinking...EDWIN::WAUGAMANIt takes a train to cryWed Dec 27 1995 13:0814
> He may indeed be durable and great pick by bumbling
> stumbling GM Parcells.
    
    One of the great CYA lines of the season was Parcells stating that
    if he hadn't lost Kevin Turner, the Pats wouldn't now have Martin.  
    It was stated with a hint of smugness, but if anything, if you think
    about it, all it does is reinforce the idea that Parcells got lucky
    (once, not overall).  Doesn't make a whole lot of sense, anyway.  If 
    the Pats hadn't signed Meggett, would they have drafted Martin higher?  
    I think not.
    
    glenn
    
56.2256WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Dec 27 1995 13:437
    
    Martin's great, no question, love him and hope we keep him.
    
    But ask me if I'd rather have last year's 10-6 team without
    him than this year's 6-10 team with him...
    
    - Sean
56.2257SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Wed Dec 27 1995 13:487
    
    	The reason why Parcells said that we wouldn't have Martin if we
    didn't lose Kevin Turner. Is because the Pats were given Philly's
    3rd round pick for them signing Turner. The Pats picked Martin with
    Phillys 3rd round pick.
    
    Ron
56.2258WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Dec 27 1995 15:2213
    
    > 	The reason why Parcells said that we wouldn't have Martin if we
    >didn't lose Kevin Turner. Is because the Pats were given Philly's
    >3rd round pick for them signing Turner. The Pats picked Martin with
    >Phillys 3rd round pick.
    
    So?  We could have still picked Martin.  He was, what, the 10th RB
    picked, and not our first pick.  
    
    I don't get Parcell's excuse.  He should have said "If we had Turner,
    I wouldn't have tried to get any other RB, including Martin," but 
    keeping Turner had nothing to do with getting or not getting Martin.
    He was available when we picked.
56.2259MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allWed Dec 27 1995 16:075
	I can't see any reason whatsoever that the Pats would
	pick anyone but a DB or WR with their first few picks.


	billl
56.2260MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Dec 27 1995 16:1726
    
   >> I can't see any reason whatsoever that the Pats would
   >> pick anyone but a DB or WR with their first few picks.

      They also need serious d-line help. I agree with the
      best available athlete philosophy. If there's a Jonathan
      Ogden available you have to take him. If there's Steve 
      Walsh available and you already have Troy Aikman you 
      take him anyways which is exactly what Dallas did. If
      he's that good someone will trade value for him or you
      have a very talented backup. If you draft strictly for
      need you run the risk of a down year in terms of the pos-
      ition you want to fill and you end up with a mediocre player
      who isn't quite good enough.
    
      As for Tuna's Turner excuse making. It's lame. And no Tuna
      probably wouldn't have drafted Martin higher. When Faulk was
      in the draft Tuna said he wouldn't take him because RB was
      always one of the deepest positions in the draft. He got Curtis 
      in the 3rd. I'm sure Tuna thinks he could replace a Turner
      in the 3rd round of any draft. And he's probably right. He
      may have gotten lucky drafting Martin but Turner goes and
      Gash steps in and becomes a Pro Bowl fullback. I don't think
      that part is luck. Gash is a Parcells type fullback. Turner
      isn't.
    
56.2261AKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustWed Dec 27 1995 18:547
    That's more the point.  If we had Turner at fullback the development in
    6-8 games of Martin as a premier running back behind Gash's blocking
    wouldn't have happened.  Not that a healthy Turner couldn't have helped
    this team though.
    
    How does the nfl with a cap and all decide that a Turner gets a 3rd
    round draft pick in compensation?
56.2262MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allWed Dec 27 1995 22:0911
	From today's USAToday:

	1996 Patriot home games: Buffalo, Miami, Indy, Jets,
	Denver, Jacksonville, Washington, Arizona

	Don't see this making for any large volumns of new
	season ticket sales.



	billl
56.2263Could have been worseMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Dec 28 1995 11:159
    You'd be surprised just how many fans Denver/Washington have.. Then
    there's the NEW KID in Jacksonville and Arizona could be an exciting
    team...
    
    Im sure the fans could think of some better teams but this isnt TOO 
    TOO BAD...
    
    PLUS they should end up with a very good home record.
    								MaB
56.2264Couldn't see that one coming...IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Dec 28 1995 11:412
Pats fired their defensive backs coach yesterday - what a surprise!
56.2265Lousy scheduleMSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Dec 28 1995 12:2212
    
  > You'd be surprised just how many fans Denver/Washington have.. Then
  > there's the NEW KID in Jacksonville and Arizona could be an exciting
  > team...
   
    They are all mediocre teams. Arizona exciting? Their offense makes
    bingo night at the old folks home look like the Mardi Gras. Washington
    might be interesting if Heath Shuler keeps progressing. What this schedule 
    will probably do is return the Pats to the playoffs and give everyone the 
    the false impression that they fixed what was broke this year even if
    it ain't. If we had played better this year we'd have had the cream 
    of the NFC east - Dallas and Philly instead of the dregs.
56.2266IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Dec 28 1995 12:338
>Arizona exciting?

No, but with Butty the Hut gone they could be.

Dave Krieg isn't Dan Marino, but he's not Trent Dilfer either.  Some decent
backs such as Garrison Hearst, Larry Centers, and Ron Moore, and the WRs aren't
bad either.  The defense has Eric Swann.  They're not that far away from being
a good team - it just looked like a chasm with Buddy at the helm...
56.2267EDWIN::WAUGAMANIt takes a train to cryThu Dec 28 1995 12:459
    Yeah, it's a pretty dull schedule.  Denver may have a lot of fans, 
    but through the luck of the draw it seems that the Patriots are 
    forever playing them.  Meanwhile, Pittsburgh still hasn't been 
    back to Foxboro since 1979.  That's a long time for a conference
    opponent.
    
    glenn
    
56.2268MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Dec 28 1995 13:0213
    
  >> Dave Krieg isn't Dan Marino, but he's not Trent Dilfer either.  
    
     After watching the Dallas game this weekend it's easy to see why
     Larry Centers broke the receiving record for backs - Krieg can't
     throw down field. If he could have, Phoenix could have made a game
     of it because Dallas was sloppy early. It's not Krieg's fault.
     Age is catching up with him. The guy is older than most stadiums
     in the league. I haven't seen Phoenix with Chris Miller but he
     would seem to be better able than Krieg to take advantage of what 
     weapons they do have. Still, I'd much rather have had the top of the
     NFC East than the likes of Phoenix no matter how much they improve
     next year.
56.2269IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Dec 28 1995 13:2210
>I haven't seen Phoenix with Chris Miller

Most of us haven't - he plays for the St. Louis Rams...

>Still, I'd much rather have had the top of the
>     NFC East than the likes of Phoenix no matter how much they improve
>     next year.

Agreed - I wasn't contesting that.  I was just saying that Arizona isn't that
far away from being good/entertaining...
56.2270OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Dec 28 1995 14:1911
56.2271MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allThu Dec 28 1995 14:516
	The road games are, along with everyone in their division,
	Cleveland/Baltimore, San Diego, Dallas and NY Giants.



	billl 
56.2272one p.o.'d Pats fanWONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Apr 17 1996 11:5944
    Well, they did it...  The Pats have offered Pat Harlow to Oakland
    for a 2nd round pick in this year's draft.

    I already know I'm going to take heat for this, so I'm not even going
    to try to be cordial about it.  This move stinks and Bill's an idiot
    who is ruining the team I cheer for.  Trading for 2nd round picks - that's 
    what REBUILDING teams do!  

    Half the things he does shows me that this is a short term business; 
    like getting rid of players the fans like and bringing in players 
    we don't.  "Team" is sacrificed for "individual" all in the name of 
    "winning."  Okay, it's the 90's, that's how Sports, Inc. is run these days.
    But Bill doesn't have the "team" or the "winning."  
    
    Then half the things Bill does make it seems like he's starting yet
    another rebuilding year.  Tell me, Bill, in your 4th year here 
    are you still rebuilding?  Do you have Clue 1 what you are
    doing?  Want me to polish those 2 Rings for ya?
    
    At least when Cunningham and Hannah and Grogan and Tippet and Marion
    and Goad were playing and losing, you enjoyed watching the team play
    (and you could generally count on seeing them from year to year).
    I liked, respected, and enjoyed watching Harlow play.  What do I
    watch now?  Bledsoe moping and pouting after Eason-ing out on another
    play or throwing into a defender's raised hands?  

    I don't care how this draft turns out, the Pats are going nowhere, and
    that without a plan.  All you Bill apologists, flame away, I don't
    care, you slammed me for saying this 4 years ago, and so far, I've been
    right.
    
    Sure, we might actually beat our 6-win record from last year, thanks to
    our favorable schedule, maybe just enough to give everybody that
    elusive "hope" again...  but you'll see...  next year or the year
    after, Bill will be gone, trailing behind him a pile of excuses about
    how the game has passed him by (which many have been telling him), and
    everybody will feel bad for this stubborn mule and how he couldn't
    duplicate his past accomplishments (2 Rings, beating the Bills and Broncos,
    both 0-4 in Super Bowls).  All the while, us fans have lost 4 or so
    precious years of wasting incredible talent and $$$$.
    
    - Sean
    
56.2273CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastWed Apr 17 1996 12:229
    Sean,
    A 2nd round pick for a backup making 1+ mill in the last year of a
    contract is not bad. Lane did a good job last year and is a better run
    blocker then Harlow. Harlow is a talented player but not irreplacable.
    Lighten up. And as for ruining the team. Before he got there they
    were 2-14. Last year was tough but the year before they were in the
    playoffs. That's not Ruining a team. Especially not this franchise.
    
    Mike
56.2274WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Apr 17 1996 13:2016
    
    Pats with Bill:  5-11, 10-6, 6-10
    
    That while getting what no other coach has gotten in New England
    (full control) and while getting paid more than any other coach.
    
    That while my ticket prices skyrocketed.
    
    His history of blunders speaks for itself.  How many coaches get
    this many chances.
    
    - Sean
    
    P.S.  Harlow was a backup 'cause he got injured.  I guess you wouldn't
          have minded losing that "backup" Bledsoe when he went down for
          a bunch of weeks a few years back.
56.2275CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastWed Apr 17 1996 14:032
    Harlow was better at the end of the year and couldn't beat out Lane.
    I
56.2276EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelWed Apr 17 1996 14:138
    Patriots are going nowhere in 1996, regardless.  They locked into 
    too many big contracts, so the flexibility to do much about it is
    severely limited.  Expanded-playoff wildcard berth, due to scheduling
    break, at best...
    
    glenn
    
56.2277CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastWed Apr 17 1996 14:318
    I don't know Glenn. All of the other AFC Least contenders have lost key
    players to Free Agency. The Colts are probably the favorites and the
    Pats are very close to them talent wise. A draft like last year will
    put the Pats even closer. It will all come down to Bledsoe and the
    receivers and the Defense. I feel better about this team going into 
    this year then last. 
    
    Mike
56.2278WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Apr 17 1996 15:1610
    
    > Harlow was better at the end of the year and couldn't beat out Lane.
    
    When did Harlow get the chance?  He didn't get back into rotation.
    
    Parcells had some kind of chip on his shoulder about him, as he is 
    wont to do with many players, and decided he could make do with Lane.  
    Pat was publically miffed at the slight.
    
    - Sean
56.2279Coach 2rings ain't all he's cracked up to be.AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherWed Apr 17 1996 15:4711
    
    
      I don't normally agree with Sean but he is right on here.  Harlow is
    better than Lane in every aspect of the game but he got hurt in training 
    camp last year and didn't come back fast enough for Tuna and ended up 
    in the dog house.  Parcells may be a great coach, I haven't seen it in 
    New England, but as a GM he is terrible.  The Pats are saddled with that 
    stiff Jeff Dellenbaugh he picked up from the Fins last year at about 2M.
    Lane may be a decent tackle but I would take Harlow in a minute.  
    
    Jerry
56.2280:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Apr 17 1996 15:527
    
    
    
         From a Raider Fans perspective.
    
    
    THANK YOU BILL!!!
56.2281MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Apr 17 1996 16:0614
    
      Parcells has a thing about playing hurt and Harlow never did.
     Bye, Pat. The flip side is that Vincent Brown *did* play hurt 
     but after years of playing for pennies when it came time to
     get paid like the big boys it was "bye, Vincent." The moral
     of the story is anybody's guess. Harlow was a nice player early
     on but he was on the DL (disabled list) more than on the OL and 
     at 1.2 mil a year that made him expendable. 
    
      As for Parcells, this is a make or break year. If he logs
     another season like last year the Patriots bandwagon will
     empty quicker than you can say "these guys stink". The only
     saving grace is that in this era the trip from top to bottom
     and vice versa has been considerably shortened. 
56.2282CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastWed Apr 17 1996 16:1613
    >>Harlow was better at the end of the year and couldn't beat out Lane.
    
    >When did Harlow get the chance?  He didn't get back into rotation.
    
    Don't you think if the coaching staff thought he could play better he
    would have played or is this another one of these instances where the
    fans know more then the coaches? Lane did a damn good job blocking last 
    year. Martin was one of the top rushers in the NFL last year and a lot 
    of those yards were to the right side. Harlow is a good tackle. If he 
    wasn't the Raiders wouldn't be giving up a high draft pick. Hopefully 
    they can take the pick and get someone who can fill one of their weak 
    spots. 
    
56.2283WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Apr 17 1996 16:3623
    
    > Don't you think if the coaching staff thought he could play better he
    > would have played or is this another one of these instances where the
    > fans know more then the coaches? 
    
    You mean like Scott Sisson?  He easily lost 5 games all by himself
    on the way to the Pats' 1993 1-11 start.  Bill finally puts in Bahr
    and we win the last 4 in a row.
    
    For the past 3 years, the Pats' fans *have* known more than the coaches.
    I know there's a lot of people who loathe that talk in SPORTS.NOTE, but
    there it is.
    
    Bill proves it himself every year by finally, slowly, begrudgingly, doing 
    what the fans have been calling for long before he noticed it.   Like
    playing the $119K Wollaugh over the $2M Dellenbach.  Like going to 4-3
    this year.  Like dumping Butts.  Over and over and over again, Parcells
    is a dime short and a day late with his decisions.  You've all said it
    yourself in here - these days, you cannot wast precious time like you
    used to be able to in the NFL.
    
    - Sean
    
56.2284Pro football ain't where it's at!TNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks UMass for a great season!Wed Apr 17 1996 17:186
    A few notes back somebody asked what it all meant, when Harlow wouldn't
    play hurt and he got cut, then Vincent Brown plays hurt and his reward
    is that he gets cut, too.  What it all means is that we should all be
    teaching our sons to be baseball players!
    
    NAZZ
56.2285CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastWed Apr 17 1996 17:528
    Nazz,
    Were you listening to Steve Lyons? Someone was ragging on him about the
    differance between the NFL and MLB average players. He said something like
    "Well let me see I can play in the NFL for 1 mill not guarenteed, and if I
    play for 4 years not walk normally for the rest of my life or I can get 
    paid 3mill/year guarenteed and be able to walk normal." 
    Which one would you rather do?
    
56.2286WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Apr 17 1996 18:424
    
    Steve Lyons was acting like a jerk the day I heard him on 'EEI.
    
    He's right about -.1, but he really came of bad other than that.
56.2287EIght years of dedication with nothing to show for itTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks UMass for a great season!Thu Apr 18 1996 13:1112
    I didn't hear Lyons, but even with the progress the NFL player's union
    has made over the past 15-20 years, it is still light years behind
    major league baseball.  
    
    I guess I was just disappointed in how the Patriots treated Vincent
    Brown.  He is a really good guy, he busted his butt and played hurt for
    them, signed a contract that was back-loaded, and got cut before he
    could collect the final two years of that contract.  And according to
    Bob Kraft, Brown was his favorite player!  I can't imagine trteating a
    played he hated any worse.
    
    NAZZ
56.2288Could the owners and players agree to this?CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastThu Apr 18 1996 13:4210
    Re-1
    That's why I think the CBA should allow a team one exemption from the
    salary cap for one veteran who has been with the same team for more
    then 7 years. You might need to limit the $ paid to 2 mill/yr but
    players like Brown, Phill Simms, Art Monk, Andre Tippet etc who have 
    given their teams years of play should not be cut because they are risks 
    to be hurt or because of injuries are not what they used to be. 
    
    Mike
    
56.2289WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Apr 18 1996 14:2144
    
    > I guess I was just disappointed in how the Patriots treated Vincent
    > Brown.  He is a really good guy, he busted his butt and played hurt for
    > them, signed a contract that was back-loaded, and got cut before he
    > could collect the final two years of that contract.  And according to
    > Bob Kraft, Brown was his favorite player!  I can't imagine trteating a
    > played he hated any worse.
    
    I agree 100%.  That's why the answer to Tommy's musing about the
    "moral of the story" is painfully obvious.  
    
    I know that this is the era of Free Agency and sports enthusiasts the
    world over are having a ball with the Rotisserie Leagues, but
    I am one fan who really misses the days when "team" meant more.  When
    Vincent would have been treated well.  When the benifits of Goad's 
    spirit and enthusiasm would have outweighed any talent or size failings
    he may have had in the eyes of the coaches and owners.  When we could
    see the same guys on "our" team year after year.  When Harlow would be
    given the benifit of the doubt after his injury.
    
    No teams are "our" teams anymore.  They are just a collection of 
    individuals with stats, replaceable on a yearly basis by another
    collection of players with stats.  Even if the Pats win a Super Bowl
    I will never feel the emotion/agony/excitement/adrenaline I did in
    '76 vs. the Raiders or '85 vs. the Dolphins.  
    
    Teams are just paper now. That's the way things are.  The Leagues have 
    forced us not to care.  We've embraced it, in fact - we love those dreaded 
    Rotisserie Leagues, we love watching and guessing and predicting Free Agency 
    moves.
    
    And, I guess I'm in the minority, because attendance isn't going down,
    it's going up.  For me, though, rooting for teams is becoming less
    emotional every day.  I would rather watch Vincent Brown play than some
    new guy who might be 1) less of an injury risk 2) 3% taller or 3) a
    trade-off for the salary cap.  
    
    Clinging to ties like rooting for your alma mater are about all there is 
    left now.
    
    - Sean
    
    
    
56.2290AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Apr 18 1996 15:3715
    According to Parcells he can't afford to pay Brown's salary if he gets
    injured just like he felt he had to keep playing Hurst when injured and
    probably realizes now that he's stuck for Hurst's full salary last
    year.
    
    I don't think either side would actually vote the 7 year plan in.  With
    the 'Cap it's what you see is what you get.  The GM really has to
    husband the money.  Unfortunately Sean is about right - Parcells
    doesn't really have the grey matter to be doing that part of the job,
    which is a shame since he does seem to understand the football end.
    
    An example is the Bledsoe situation where he has 7 mil tied up there
    but is paying peanuts to the receiving corps.  Pittsbugh seems to be
    doing the opposite, it has the receivers but wouldn't pay the
    quarterback.
56.2291SNAX::ERICKSONThu Apr 18 1996 15:535
    
    	The lack of a "TEAM" concept has been caused by GREED, caused
    by both the owners and the players.
    
    Ron
56.2292XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 18 1996 15:5510
I don't know Billte. I think Pitt was willing to pay the QB. 4 million for
ODonnell was an excellent offer considering his talents and lack of bigtime
accomplishments. It's not their fault that the Jets were so desperate they
were willing to overpay Neil by roughly 2 million. Bledsoe on the other hand
robbed the Patriots blind. I'd place Bledsoe's worth at about 2.5 to 3 million
based on what he has accomplished so far and I don't think that he'll ever be
worth more than 5 million per and that's based on the number of shirts and 
other paraphenelia sold with the number 11 on it......

mike
56.2293MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu Apr 18 1996 18:028
	billte, me thinks it's tome for your nap again.

	At $3.5M, O'D would have been a good buy for the Steelers.
	(That happens to be what they offered.) At $5M he's a stiff
	for no matter who is dumb enough to pay it.


	billl
56.2294AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Apr 18 1996 19:5016
    That's a fine opinion and I'll fight for your right to express it.  It
    does not address my point whcih is the Steelers and Pats have the same
    problem for 96 the passing attack vis a vis use of money.  Pitt has it
    tied up in receivers, the Pats in the qb.  The smart teams don't just
    put it in one place, although I'm not sure how much all those receivers
    of yours cost.
    
    I think the offer was 3.5 and O'D said he would've taken 4m prior to
    the final humongous offer.  I think I'm pretty clear at this point
    about Pitt not thinking O'Donnell worth signing for the $, just not
    entirely clear about what Pitt plans to do now that he's a Jet except
    for some vague plan to do with castoffs,minor leaguers and this Slash
    character.
    
    At least you're in the Central where you can train a qb and maybe still
    make the playoffs.
56.2295XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 18 1996 20:233
Just how much are the Steelers paying these gifted receivers of theirs? Given
their usual prudency with cash I wouldn't be  surprised to find out that
they're paying their receivers less than the Pats are.......
56.2296CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Apr 19 1996 12:076
Gotta love these New Hampshirites:

		Opine Free or Die!


8^)
56.2297Yeh, the l seems to be rightAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellFri Apr 19 1996 15:233
    Considering that egg-besplattered Conneticut face of yours from the
    Kaspar's a twit fiasco we're not the only free-opinioned state in the
    union.
56.2298CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Apr 19 1996 16:4715
>                       -< Yeh, the l seems to be right >-
>
>    Considering that egg-besplattered Conneticut face of yours from the
>    Kaspar's a twit fiasco we're not the only free-opinioned state in the
>    union.

Kasper's still NOT done anything more than Sutter....  The jury is still out on
him.

All I said that I just had a little more respect for him.  

Think of it like this -- he's gone from total twit to someone who should know
better and needs to prove it....


56.2299IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue Apr 23 1996 12:232
So, what do you folks think of the Patriots drafting Nebraska
should-have-been-ex-con Christian Peter?
56.2300WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Apr 23 1996 12:363
    
    I'm not real happy with it.  :^(
    
56.2301Peter bigger timebomb than Phillips (who I wouldn't worry about)EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Apr 23 1996 13:1215
> So, what do you folks think of the Patriots drafting Nebraska
> should-have-been-ex-con Christian Peter?
    
    For all the talk around Lawrence Phillips' transgressions, the
    only reason Peter didn't get much more bad pub is because he's not
    as well known, nor as good a player.  Peter has been in more scrapes, 
    taken more battery and sexual harrassment charges (nolo contendre, 
    Nebraska Cornhusker), including another one right up through last month.
    
    All of which makes Bob Kraft Mr. Capital H Hypocrite if really did 
    say as quoted that he'd never draft a player like Lawrence Phillips.
    
    glenn
    
56.2302SNAX::ERICKSONTue Apr 23 1996 13:3421
    
    	After seeing the story about a Tennessee player who was accused of
    rape, its hard to say how you handle these types of incidents. The
    player was suspended from the team and didn't play this season. The
    season was pretty much over and the case was dismissed. So the player
    missed his entire senior season for nothing. The player had two options
    petition the NCAA to grant him another year of eligibility, or enter
    the NFL draft. He entered the NFL draft because he wouldn't know what
    the NCAA's decesion would be, before he had to file for the draft.
    Plus, the fact that once your accused you always have a reputation. I
    don't know if this player was drafted. He never denied having sex with
    the woman, he claims it was consentual, she being only 17 said it
    wasn't. The grand jury and prosecution believed him and dropped the
    case.
    
    	As far as Christian Peter goes, the Patriots investigated his
    past. According to what I have read is that he hasn't had any problems
    since pleading "no contest" in 1994. He was given 18 months probation
    which just recently was completed.
    
    Ron
56.2303CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Apr 23 1996 13:538
>    as well known, nor as good a player.  Peter has been in more scrapes, 
>    taken more battery and sexual harrassment charges (nolo contendre, 
>    Nebraska Cornhusker), including another one right up through last month.

Hey, maybe he just cut his finger going into a drawer for a knife.  You know.


8^)
56.2304Hope racism is not involved hereTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks UMass for a great season!Tue Apr 23 1996 14:135
    Is the fact that CHristian Peter is white have anything to do with his
    relative lack of notariety?  Seems like his offenses were just as
    severe and more extensive than what Phillips did.
    
    NAZZ
56.2305The guy is a wackjob...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Apr 23 1996 14:1510
    
>    As far as Christian Peter goes, the Patriots investigated his
>    past. According to what I have read is that he hasn't had any problems
>    since pleading "no contest" in 1994.
    
    Not correct.  Peter again just pled no contest last month, 15 yards,
    excessive fondling...
    
    glenn
    
56.2306IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue Apr 23 1996 14:533
Maybe the Pats hope to "channel his energy"...

Size-wise, he seems to fit what Parcells is looking for - over 300 pounds.
56.2307MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Apr 23 1996 15:1922
  >> So, what do you folks think of the Patriots drafting Nebraska
  >> should-have-been-ex-con Christian Peter?

     Disappointed but not surprised. The NFL and pro sports in general
     has always placed a bigger premium on athletic ability than on 
     personal conduct. If Lawrence Taylor didn't have the ability he
     had, Parcells never would have put up with his off field antics
     in New York. Dexter Manley's career would have lasted two weeks
     in Washington. And Steve Howe wouldn't be attempting his 47th come-
     back. The owners (as always) talk a good fight but when it comes
     right down to it all they really care about is the bottom line.

     
     BTW - In today's column Will McDonough writes that the shift in
           power over personnel from Parcells to Bobby Grier bodes ill
           for the Patsies future. Will seems to have forgotten that
           it was George Young who built those championship Giants teams.
           And Will seems to have forgitten the high-priced free agents
           that Tuna has brought in and who have almost to a man been
           complete busts. I would have preferred Daryll Gardener to
           Terry Glenn but Parcells apparently didn't want him either.
    
56.2308Let Parcells coach - it's what he does bestTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks UMass for a great season!Tue Apr 23 1996 15:239
    I agree with yuo Tommy, about both the NFL willingness to look the
    other way on certain "personality defects" as long as the lad can run
    through a brick wall.  And McDonough as usual is smarmy and
    self-serving.  Who does he think he's kidding with this demise of the
    Pats stuff?  Parcells will cut whoever he wants, he just doesn't obtain
    the players.  It worked pretty well in New York; no reason it won't
    work well here.
    
    NAZZ
56.2309CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Apr 23 1996 15:2922
I disagree that it was Young alone who built the Giants.

Young had a couple of excellent picks before Parcells came.  But if you look
at the picks made during their joint tenure, when the two of the would argue
and fight like cats and dogs over personnel, you'll find that those were far
better than any draft choices since.

George Young has been in a five year slump, and Mr Ego-As-Big-As-His-Ears
doesn't appear to have done any better this year, although he did kinda get
stiffed by everyone in front of him this year.

What happened to Parcells and Young is what people PREDICTED would happen to
Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis when they split -- neither would be as good as they
were together.


Don't sell Parcells short, except that he won't be as good with Young to fight
with him.


Hey, now there's an idea -- you guys want George Young?????  You can have him
along with the plastic grass he'll put back in Foxboro.....
56.2311SNAX::ERICKSONTue Apr 23 1996 17:3516
    re .2310,
    
    	HUH?
    
    		Terry Glenn ran a 4.37 in the 40, I don't think the TE ran
     better than 4.5. Forget about how fast he can run, The man seems to
    have glue on his hands, which is what I like about him.
    
    	As far as Darryl Gardener, he lasted until the 20th pick, as far as
    Tony Brackens goes he went 33rd. Which sort of justifies the Patriots
    taking Terry Glenn with the 7th pick. If either one of those players
    were that good to be taken with the 7th pick, they wouldn't have had
    3 or  4 other DE/DL men drafted ahead of them and would have been
    drafted by someone else in the top 10.
    
    Ron
56.2313WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 23 1996 17:489
    
    
        Yes he was faster than Glenn.
    
       And he now plays for DA RAIDAS!!!
    
    
    
    Chap
56.2315WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 23 1996 18:143
    
    
    Rickey Dudley  4.48
56.2316MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Apr 23 1996 18:2715
    
    >>As far as Darryl Gardener, he lasted until the 20th pick, as far as
    >>Tony Brackens goes he went 33rd. Which sort of justifies the Patriots
    >>taking Terry Glenn with the 7th pick. If either one of those players
    >>were that good to be taken with the 7th pick, they wouldn't have had
    >>3 or  4 other DE/DL men drafted ahead of them and would have been
    >>drafted by someone else in the top 10.
    
      How many backs were taken in fron of Emmitt Smith? How many QBs taken
      in front of Dan Marino? How many DLs in front of Leon Lett? Where
      you're taken is not an absolute indication of how good a plyer your 
      are or will be. I can live with the Glenn pick but I would have loved 
      Gardener. Him being picked 20th just means the Pats could have moved 
      down, acquired more picks and still have gotten him.
    
56.2317Keeshawn maybeAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Apr 23 1996 18:548
    
    
    
     Lets see......4.37 is quicker than 4.46 so Glenn is faster than
    Dudley.  Not that 4.46 is not a incredible time for a TE.  Secondly
    who is Leshon Johnson?
    
    Jerry
56.2319SNAX::ERICKSONTue Apr 23 1996 18:5718
    re .2316,
    
    	I see your point on where was Emmitt Smith drafted and where was
    Dan Marino drafted. The question is all 30 teams rate players and
    create a draft board. Did ANY of the 30 teams have Gardener or Brackens
    in there top 10 list?, I doubt it. If we had access to all 30 teams draft
    boards and who they had rated as the top 30 prospects. I would guess
    that EVERY team had between 20-25 of the same players in there top 30.
    	The odds say that, the player you have rated in the top 10, will
    be a better player then your 100th rated player. You will have your
    lucky/fluke picks, this is where Emmitt and Marino come in. At the
    time they were drafted NOBODY had them rated in the top 10, NOBODY knew
    they would be that good. Who was the #7 pick the year Dan Marino was
    drafted and who was the #7 pick the year Emmitt Smith was drafted? I
    don't know, but the odds say they were quality players.
    
    Ron
    
56.2320WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 23 1996 19:084
    
    
        I heard the same thing I didn't know Glenn ran a 4.37? If'n I was
    the pats I would have drafted Harrison from Da Cuse!!
56.2321IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue Apr 23 1996 19:449
What did you say, Chappy????  You mean you wouldn't draft a guy
from Georgetown??!!!!  :-)

I'll be watching Marvin Harrison with great interest.  He's a big-play
guy.  Let's see if Harbaugh can get him the ball deep...

Glenn may or may not have been the best pick, but as an earlier reply said,
he is a quality player.  The guy made TONS of plays last year.  And 4.37 is
not exactly turtle-like...
56.2322CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Apr 24 1996 13:0813
YOu guys know that those speed numbers are not the be all and end all.

How often have we heard that once you put the pads on it all changes.

I keep hearing about Jerry Rice.  Put in him a timed 40 and he doesn't do that
well.  Put him in pads with a guy on his ass and he lights the afterburner.


What I had heard about Glenn, floating around alt.sports.pro-football.ny-giants
was that he was a headcase.  Any truth to that allegation?


'Saw
56.2323IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanWed Apr 24 1996 13:1511
>What I had heard about Glenn, floating around alt.sports.pro-football.ny-giants
>was that he was a headcase.  Any truth to that allegation?

Probably not.

He has been through a lot.  Never knew his dad, his mom committed suicide
when he was 14 (?), he moved in with his aunts but couldn't get along with
them, then moved in with a friend's family.  My guess is that he grew up
while very young and grew up quickly.

Giant fans know almost as much as Jet fans... :-)
56.2324IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanWed Apr 24 1996 13:162
...and Terry Glenn will probably have to listen to Christian Peter
moan about how tough he has it...
56.2325If Parcells didn't like him, that's a plus...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Apr 24 1996 13:269
    
> What I had heard about Glenn, floating around alt.sports.pro-football.ny-giants
> was that he was a headcase.  Any truth to that allegation?
    
    Yeah, so?  What business is that of the giants' newsgroup?
    
    
    glenn

56.2326CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Apr 24 1996 13:3017
re the Giants newsgroup:

	Bein' on the internet it's wide open.  Probably more Raider and
	Cowboy's fans out there most times.....

    
>> What I had heard about Glenn, floating around alt.sports.pro-football.ny-giants
>> was that he was a headcase.  Any truth to that allegation?
>    
>    Yeah, so?  What business is that of the giants' newsgroup?
    

	They heard that Glenn went into baseball and figured he must be
	crazy....



56.2327SNAX::ERICKSONWed Apr 24 1996 13:555
    
    	Terry Glenn's mother didn't commit suicide she was murdered,
    she got shot during a bar altercation.
    
    Ron
56.2328a connectionHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedWed Apr 24 1996 14:5018
and now for the Carolinas connection...

The local media are saying that New Orleans really wanted Biakabutuka 
bad. Knowing that the Painters would take him if'n he was still 
available, the Saints went to the Pats and tried to swap picks and some 
throw ins. The Pats woulda got the Saints' #11 pick which, supposedly, 
Parcells wanted to use for DE Duane Clemons. The Saints would then take 
Biakabutuka as the #7 pick.

Now, at this point, two stories are floating around. The firsted is that 
the Saints weren't offering enough to sweeten the deal. The other is that 
owner Kraft intervened and went along with Player Personnel Director
Grier and stuck with Terry Glenn.

FWIW, the Painters claim they woulda traded down if'n Biakabutuka had not 
been around at #8.

TTom
56.2329AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellWed Apr 24 1996 15:239
    Ttom Will McDonough, a local Bill Parcells mouthpiece had two articles
    in the Glove: The first on Saturday intimated that Parcells was
    battling with owner Kraft and predicting that Parcells would lose and
    Kraft (and Grier) would take Glenn.  
    
    Then after the pick Will speculated that Bill had seriously lost face
    ... and was talked about in here.  You're tale adds more fuel, I'm
    surprised McDonough wasn't aware of it.  But Parcells seemed to want
    the guy who went earlier than #7 anyway.
56.2330SNAX::ERICKSONWed Apr 24 1996 15:4012
    
    	What Tom said is pretty much right on the money. The Patriots
    were offered the #11 pick and something for the #7 pick, from NO.
    IMO once Cedric Jones was taken, the Patriots were taking a WR with
    the #7 pick, regardless of what Parcells wanted to do. Kraft/Grier
    felt that someone would trade up into the 8, 9, OR 10 slot and
    draft Glenn, so they didn't want to take a chance. Parcells opinion
    was to trade down to #11 and see what happens. If Glenn is still there
    at #11 you draft him, if not you take a Regen Upshaw, Duane Clemons,
    or Darryl Gardener, and go WR in the 2nd round.
    
    Ron
56.2332WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Apr 24 1996 22:266
    
    Christian Peter was released by the Pats today.
    
    Now there's plannin' for ya...
    
    - Sean
56.2333WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Apr 24 1996 22:3521
    
    Will McDounough is a flaming moron.  That article that Tommy mentioned
    was just another in a long line of butt-kissin' manure.  If Will's
    not shilling for the NFL or making misinformed idiotic predictions,
    he'll take the time out to show his ignorance with an editorial like
    this.
    
    Parcells loses power 'cause he didn't get his way?  He SHOULDN'T get
    his way...  With GM moves he's proved a hundred bazillion times he's
    not up to the task.  His SB's were won when he wasn't making them and
    he's got a pretty sorry success rate making them here in NE.
    
    The last line of that article really cracks me up - that the Giants
    didn't pick Glenn and they don't have any famous WR's either. 
    Supposedly this proves that Bill was right to not want one, too.
    Yeah, Will, that's why the Giants are living in the same neighborhood
    as the Pats - the cellar.
    
    Man, that guy irks me.
    
    - Sean
56.2334XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 25 1996 11:5212
 The Giants didn't take Glenn cause it would have been a wasted pick. If they
 had a QB that could get him the ball then maybe he'd have been worth it but
 with Duck Brown at the helm a premier WR isn't going to produce anyways. I
 think the Pats should have taken Eric Moulds myself. I think he'll be better
 than Glenn in the long run. Also as someone else was saying either in here
 or ::Giants they could have had Bobby Engram in the second round who may not
 have the balzing speed but all he does is makes plays and lots of them.

 So it appears the Pats are being run by a woman now..........hahaaa

 ;^)
56.2335CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastThu Apr 25 1996 12:5610
    Oh my God I almost totally agree with Sean. :^) With the Salary Cap and
    Free Agency it takes more then one person today to run an
    organization's draft, Free Agency and trades because with they all tie
    together in the Salary structure. Jimmy Johnson came back and the first
    thing he did was hire his old personnel director from the Eagles. 
    McDonough remains in the 70's and 80's where he developed all his
    contacts like Shula, Parcells and Knoll. The days of a coach having
    total control and wearing more then one hat is just about gone.
    
    Mike
56.2336SNAX::ERICKSONThu Apr 25 1996 13:136
    
    	If Will McDonough was any good at evaluating football talent, he
    would still be a GM somewhere in the league, instead he is kissing up
    to current GM's so he can make a living writing.
    
    Ron
56.2337AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Apr 25 1996 13:449
    I never knew Will McDonough worked in the NFL as a GM.  I really only
    became aware of him when he had the fight with Claiborne for which the
    latter may have been sucked into by the Sullivans.  His feud with the
    Sullivans is in the best tradition of Boston social culture of which
    the current saying that vendettas and politics make Boston go.
    
    Do not read the Monday column without trying to get the Saturday column
    for the two go together.  9 out of 10 McDonough opinions tend to be
    worthless but that doesn't stop him.
56.2339XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 25 1996 16:409
According to ImJimbo it was actually a good pick football wise because Peter
is big and an animal but from a character standpoint and from answering to
your wife it was bad.........

I really avoid watching Nebraska games so I can't really give a fair evaluation
of his football talent but given IMJIMBO's sterling reputation, I'd say we
could take it as gospel that Peter is a very good football player.........

 ;^)
56.2340Husker version on Peter?AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Apr 25 1996 17:389
    I was not aware of Peter Christian's latest crime at the end of the
    season which involved direct violence upon a woman.  Given his past
    record this was inexcusable.  It would point to an alcohol problem
    except if no substance abuse is indicated then I would call it
    mental illness.
    
    Parcell's supposedly talked to Osborne - I wonder if it was before the
    latest incident.  Since there's so much slant one way on this I'd be
    curious to see Husker Henderson's version.
56.2341Franchise in disarrayEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Apr 25 1996 17:578
    Well, between the bait-and-switch pulled off by the Raiders on the draft
    pick for Harlow, the front-office split on Terry Glenn, and now the
    completely inexcusable squandering of a 5th-round pick, one would
    think the Sullivans are still in the building...
    
    glenn
    
56.2342Sportszone article on PetersHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedThu Apr 25 1996 17:5856
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   ESPNET SportsZone | NFL
   
            PATS CUT DRAFT PICK, CITING HIS VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
                                       
   
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   FOXBORO, Mass. -- The New England Patriots, citing Christian Peter's
   history of violence against women, released the fifth-round draft pick
   on Wednesday.
   
   "Unfortunately, we did not have complete information regarding
   Christian Peter's record at the time we made our draft selection,"
   said Bobby Grier, Patriots director of player personnel.
   
   Peter, 6-foot-3 and 304 pounds, started the past two seasons at
   defensive tackle for Nebraska's back-to-back national champions.
   
   His former teammate, running back Lawrence Phillips, is on one year of
   probation after pleading no contest in an attack on a former
   girlfriend last fall. The St. Louis Rams took Phillips last weekend
   with the sixth overall pick in the draft.
   
   Peter recently was convicted of disturbing the peace in an incident in
   which he was accused of grabbing a woman by the throat at a Kearney,
   Neb., bar following a booster club banquet March 6.
   
   In May 1994, Peter pleaded guilty to third-degree assault of a former
   Miss Nebraska. He served 18 months probation, which expired in early
   January.
   
   "Based on information we obtained in the last 48 hours following a
   review of his past actions, we concluded his behavior is incompatible
   with our organization's standards of acceptable conduct," Grier said.
   
   Peter also has been arrested on suspicion of disturbing the peace,
   trespassing, urinating in public, refusing to comply with the order of
   a policeman and third-degree assault for threatening to kill a parking
   attendant.
   
   The Patriots' claim that they were unaware of Peter's criminal record,
   despite extensive information available to all NFL teams on draft
   prospects.
   
   Players perform in scouting combines, where they receive psychological
   evaluations. In addition, the NFL's security division investigates top
   college players, and that information also is passed on to clubs.
   
   A Sports Illustrated article in the March 18 issue also reported on
   Peter's criminal record.
   
   
     _________________________________________________________________
   
56.2343XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 25 1996 18:014
What BS is Grier trying to pull off? If we knew about his record you can bet
your butt they knew too. They tried to pull a fast one but Mrs. Kraft and the
public got on them and they changed their minds.........
56.2344GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Thu Apr 25 1996 18:574
    
    	You mean the Pats upper echelon don't read ::sports?
    
    Claybone
56.2345MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu Apr 25 1996 19:357
>        You mean the Pats upper echelon don't read ::sports?

	If not, it would explain their problems.



	billl
56.2346Steelers could benefit from this note, tooAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Apr 25 1996 19:381
    
56.2347Parcells on the way out?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed May 01 1996 13:588
And meanwhile, what's this about Parcells leaving after this season?

The reports are that he had his contract restructured so he could get out
early. I guess all in not well in the love fest we call the Pats.

Evidently, Parcells and Kraft agreed to disagree and Bill is gonna walk.

TTom
56.2348WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed May 01 1996 14:1621
    
    The restructuring came about at Bill's request *after* last year's
    dismal 6-10 record and *before* the hiring of Bellichek.
    
    So this has nothing to do with recent disagreements around draft
    picks.  Probably more to do with Bill's disappointment last year.
    That's what happens when you don't have someone else making GM
    decisions for ya.
    
    The Providence Journal has been reporting bad vibes and a general
    feeling that Bill had 1 (if not less) more year here for a while.
    The Boston press is just gettin' on the bandwagon (probably because
    they have such a love affair with BP).
    
    Personally, I'm glad someone cut back BP's power.  He wasn't making
    good choices, and if he's p.o.'d about any loss of power by the
    overrides he had to sustain in this draft, well, I guess he doesn't
    practice what he preaches about toughening things out.  He has
    seriously damaged a team with potential by making bad GM moves.
    
    - Sean
56.2349he ain't no offense guy...POWDML::GARBARINOThu May 02 1996 20:112
I read that he didn't like the Glenn pick.  Of course, he didn't like
the Hampton pick when he was with the Giants, either.
56.2350Parcells' opinion of Glenn almost irrelavantEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri May 03 1996 20:4613
    
    > Of course, he didn't like the Hampton pick when he was with the
    > Giants, either.
    
    ...nor the Meggett pick, which he absolutely hated, but that didn't
    stop Proud Bill from falling in love with the guy, to the extent that
    he'd then overpay him once past his prime...
    
    As far as I'm concerned, if Parcells doesn't like a draft pick, it
    can only be a bonus (even a motivator) going in...
    
    glenn
    
56.2351another black eyeHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jul 09 1996 16:586
Lost in the shuffle:

Y'all got another goodun, eh? Your firsted pick, Terry Glenn, has been
busted. Something about driving and wrecking without a license.

TTom
56.2352No liquor involved thoughCSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastTue Jul 09 1996 17:046
    Yeah the ex-Ohio St player get's busted for driving with a suspended 
    license and failure to control his car. Rolled over his new car
    (Mercedes I think) doing 60 in a 35 mph zone. Terry the Pats want you
    to be a deep threat like Irving Fryar not a driving threat like Irving.
    
    mike
56.2353WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Jul 09 1996 17:529
    
    
    
      Irving    Cha Ching
      Hart Lee  Cha Ching
      Glenn     Cha Ching
    
    
    
56.2354IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue Jul 09 1996 18:328
>Something about driving and wrecking without a license.

Can you drive and wreck if you *do* have a license?

If so, I'd love to see the criteria for granting them... :-)

Yup, WAAF this morning was mentioning Terry Glenn as the latest attendee
of the Irving Fryar Driving Academy.
56.2355kindaHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jul 09 1996 18:371
Wail, insurance is sorta like a license to wreck.
56.2356CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastTue Jul 09 1996 18:584
    Well since Irving left Car insurance has gone down for Ma. drivers.
    Will this mean they'll head back up?
    
    Mike
56.2357SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jul 09 1996 19:4011
    
    	Terry Glenn's lawyer/agent is PO'ed at the state of Ohio. Apparantly
    Terry Glenn lost his Ohio license, since he lives in Florida he applied
    and received a Florida license. Then when he went back to Ohio, they
    issued him a new Ohio license. So in the last 60 days he has been
    issued TWO licenses. Then he gets in a little car accident and gets
    busted for a suspended license. His license has been suspended since
    1993. So the Ohio Registry broke there own laws and issued a new
    license to someone, while there license was suspended.
    
    Ron 
56.2358sounds 'bout rightHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jul 09 1996 19:433
Whatta ya expect outta Ohio?

TTom
56.2359pre-season,regular season, post-season a Dallas loss is a good thingAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Aug 13 1996 10:4019
    
    
    
      31-7 Pats trounce da Pokes last night in Dallas.  I know it was a
    pre-season game and Emmitt wasn't playin but the Pats did execute well
    and their defense looked pretty good against da boy's starters.  Peon
    Deion was a non-factor, gotta love him looking for a flag after him
    and Ty Law go down.  Speaking of Law I'm still looking for the FIRST
    pass interference call on him, second one was a no brainer but the
    first was incidental contact and he got robbed.  Curtis looked good
    last night actually had some holes to run through.  Devin Wyman had
    another pass deflection last night and also played the run pretty well.
    He looks like the steal of the draft so far.  Teddy Brushci (sp) also
    looked pretty good but is still learning to play linebacker after
    playing a down lineman in college.  They Pats where pretty sloppy
    though had about 100+ yards in penalties.  Even with a win I know Tuna
    was screamin with that stat.  31-7 see ya in Dec.
    
    Jerry
56.2360MKOTS3::BREENTue Aug 13 1996 12:107
    Bledsoe will never become a deep passer, it's missing in his football
    makeup.  It's like Clemens trying to learn to throw a knuckleball. No
    matter what he tries to do he can't master the trick of having the ball
    drop down at the end of 55-60 yards.
    
    Pretty much totally meaningless except better than having the score
    reversed.
56.2361EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Aug 13 1996 12:3513
    Loved it when da refs threw the red instant-replay hanky back in 
    Barry's face which elicited the response of "bullshit!".  Granted 
    the play did look like one of those no-way-he-made-it impossible
    grabs, but sure enough the replay showed that the receiver just
    as likely did pull off the impossible as didn't, and da refs were
    vindicated.  Apparently an overruling of calls like these based on 
    the Special League Policy for Cowboys (Mr. Carver, your suspension 
    is hereby reduced) will wait for the league's inception of this 
    (good) system for meaningful, regular-season games only.
    
    glenn
     
56.2362EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Aug 13 1996 12:3910
    
    In other news, The Tuna has already pretty well placed the "Big Dog"
    tag on Terry Glenn, huh?  Or at least he's disappointed and is 
    questioning Glenn's toughness with the usual statements like "we'll 
    see which guys can play hurt and which can't".  It's a motivational
    ploy, but it sure didn't take long to see it used against the player
    Parcells allegedly supposedly reportedly didn't want in the first place.
    
    glenn
    
56.2363MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Tue Aug 13 1996 14:2320
56.2363MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticWed Sep 04 1996 13:3718
    
       The year the Pats drafted Bledsoe I wanted them to take
      Marvin Jones instead. Three years later I wish that it was
      Marvin Jones I coud be watching instead of Drew. And it isn't
      just because of Drew's dumb and dumber mistakes. Or that he
      does his Tony (Eason) The Turtle routine whenever he feels 
      pressure. The kid has no fire. I want to see him get in some-
      body's face. I want to see him show that he's sportin' more
      than a pair of grape seeds. It's bad enough that you have to
      cringe whenever he throws into coverage or locks on to a re-
      ceiver but he's so damned dull that the only thing that can 
      keep you awake when he's on the field is the suspense of when 
      he'll do something completely stupid. And this move of Tuna's
      to not list Zolak on his game day roster seems designed to el-
      iminate any possibility of a QB controversy when what Drew really
      needs is a swiift kick in the butt not to be babied. Drew has the
      physicals but it remains to be seen whether Tuna can give him
      the mentals. The jury is still out.
56.2364have to anyone since they have no secondaryPHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Thu Sep 12 1996 14:414
    Word from the Cards' coaching staff is that they believe Bledsoe has
    developed "happy feet" and plan on sending the defense after him.
    
    Mike
56.2365PECAD8::CHILDSThu Sep 12 1996 14:491
Anesas Williams ought to get 3 picks this week I figure............
56.2366CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Sep 12 1996 15:013
  What are "happy feet"?

  George
56.2367CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Sep 12 1996 15:0519
>
>  What are "happy feet"?
>
>  George


It's a term used in football to denote a quarterback who gets nervous in the
pocket -- usually because his offensive line hasn't been blocking too well and
he's getting sacked a lot.

A QB with happy feet will tend to leave the pocket and scramble a lot quicker
than you'd like him to.

'Course, with Bledsoe, he ain't much of a scrambler....



'Saw

56.2368INTsHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Sep 12 1996 15:2611
Scrambling is just one of the symptoms of happy feet. Throwing early is
another. Then there's the technique where you're so worried about the
pass rush that you don't set you feet properly for the throw. The
symptom for this is that the pass is underthrown, often leading to
a_interception.

Under the dicitionary, if'n you look up happy feet they'll show you
Chrissie Everett, currently with the Saints. The Painters successfully
exploited this to rally and win lasted Sunday.

TTom
56.2369PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Thu Sep 12 1996 15:322
    Naw, everyone is afraid to throw to Aeneas.  Everyone always throws at
    the opposite cornerback.
56.2370MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticThu Sep 12 1996 15:349
    
  >> Word from the Cards' coaching staff is that they believe Bledsoe has
  >> developed "happy feet" 
    
     He exhibited that tendency more than once last Sunday against 
     Buffalo. His confidence seems to be at a low ebb. Hopefully, the 
     Cardinals can help cure that because if we lose this weekend the 
     season is essentially over.
     
56.2371Ray Perkins is the route of all evil in New EngalndAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherThu Sep 12 1996 16:1012
    
    
       If the Cards send their D at Bledsoe they'll loose.  He has happy
    feet and I don't think he playes well under a heavy rush but the Card
    front 7 is not as good as the Bills and Armstrong is bound to play a
    lot better than he did againts Bruce Smith which will make for a long
    day for the Card secondary.  If they send the kitched sink at Drew and
    Tuna wakes up and lets the kid do his thing the Pats will win by 30. 
    If Tuna pulls back on the reigns they'll only win by 10 or so.  Simple
    fact is the Cards are worse off offensively than the Pats.
    
    Jerry
56.2372NQOS01::nqsrv142.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchThu Sep 12 1996 16:386
Cards front 7 is pretty good.  It's the only good part of the team.  And it's 
not that the teams want to stay away from Aneas, it's that the other CB is 
soooooo bad.

brews
56.2373IMOHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Sep 12 1996 16:516
re: Armstrong vs Bruce Smith

At this point in their careers, I'd think that Eric Swann wouldn't be
considered a_easier DL to handle than Smith.

TTom
56.2374Oh no, I have happy feet!PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Thu Sep 12 1996 16:557
>
>  What are "happy feet"?
>
>  George


    I think that the wild-and-crazy-guy Steve Martin had them as well.
56.2375and anotherHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Sep 12 1996 16:576
>    I think that the wild-and-crazy-guy Steve Martin had them as well.

I caught _Baron Munchausen_ yesterday. Eric Idle definitely had happy
feet.

TTom
56.2376PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Thu Sep 12 1996 19:354
    yeah as Brews said, the Cards front 7 are probably the most talented
    group on the team: Eric Swann, Michael Bankston, Simeon Rice, Seth
    Joyner, Eric Hill, Jamir Miller.  The secondary sips outside of Aeneas.  
    the other side of the ball sips outside of Larry Centers.
56.2377Cob webeth be clearingMFGFIN::JACKSONThe time is nearFri Sep 13 1996 02:4715
      RE- What are happy feet?
    
      That reminds me of an episode of WKRP of Cinncy.  One of Carlson's
    new employees brings in some cocaine, and Carlson gets ahold of it and
    puts it on his feet thinking its foot power.  His feet went knumb and
    he goes crazy stomping his feet thinking something is wrong with his
    feet and then Andy comes in and found out what he had done and starts
    crackin up.
    
      Andy tells him its cocaine and Carlson freaks thinking he will become
    an addict.
    
      I was rollin,
    
      Tim
56.2378AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherFri Sep 13 1996 09:379
56.2379Elway > BledsoePECAD8::CHILDSFri Sep 13 1996 12:185
56.2380as good but not with as goodHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Sep 13 1996 14:0012
56.2381WKRP was a really good showTNPUBS::NAZZAROTwo months to Maui - Go UMass!Fri Sep 13 1996 14:295
56.2382SALEM::DODASearching for the next distractionFri Sep 13 1996 14:364
56.2383barring injuryMKOTS3::BREENFri Sep 13 1996 14:5110
56.2384PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Mon Sep 16 1996 17:345
56.2385NQOS01::nqsrv237.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchMon Sep 16 1996 23:404
56.2386MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticTue Sep 17 1996 13:3210
56.2387SMART2::CHILDSMon Sep 23 1996 17:572
56.2388NQOS01::nqsrv323.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchMon Sep 23 1996 18:024
56.2389PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Mon Sep 23 1996 18:111
56.2390SMART2::CHILDSMon Sep 23 1996 18:171
56.2391MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticMon Sep 23 1996 18:267
56.2392WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Mon Sep 23 1996 18:5615
56.2393AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Sep 23 1996 19:0025
56.2394NQOS01::nqsrv211.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchMon Sep 23 1996 19:025
56.2395CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Sep 24 1996 12:5111
56.2396Coates is over-ratedPECAD8::CHILDSTue Sep 24 1996 15:332
56.2397WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Sep 24 1996 15:4615
56.2398MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticTue Sep 24 1996 15:558
56.2399AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Sep 24 1996 16:043
56.2400WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Sep 24 1996 17:395
56.2401PECAD8::CHILDSTue Sep 24 1996 17:429
56.2402MKOTS3::BREENWed Sep 25 1996 14:2510
56.2403PECAD8::CHILDSWed Sep 25 1996 14:426
56.2404MKOTS3::BREENWed Sep 25 1996 16:228
56.2405EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Sep 26 1996 12:405
56.2406MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticThu Sep 26 1996 12:5310
56.2407CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Sep 26 1996 12:574
56.2408PECAD8::CHILDSThu Sep 26 1996 13:584
56.2409MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticThu Sep 26 1996 14:063
56.2410PECAD8::CHILDSThu Sep 26 1996 14:341
56.2411CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Sep 26 1996 14:465
56.2412I'm holding out for the Dave Brown jersey myself...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Sep 26 1996 14:507
56.2413MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticThu Sep 26 1996 15:033
56.2414MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticFri Sep 27 1996 17:148
56.2415CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Sep 27 1996 17:221
56.2416He took it way too personally...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Sep 27 1996 18:539
56.2417Hope the amazing play of the last two games is for realEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 08 1996 13:367
56.2418ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Oct 08 1996 14:273
56.2419Whoever gave Tommy that Pname is cruelAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Oct 08 1996 15:458
56.2420Doesn't make him a bad player; we're talking mindsetEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 08 1996 16:4710
56.2421MSBCS::BRYDIEBen Coates the Princess of TE'sTue Oct 08 1996 16:5410
56.2422AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Oct 08 1996 19:179
56.2423There hasn't been a real "strategy" with ParcellsEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 08 1996 19:2615
56.2424TRADE??FABSIX::R_LUCHT&quot;Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof&quot;Thu Oct 10 1996 05:398
56.2425You're absolutely right RichFABSIX::D_HORTERTThu Oct 10 1996 07:185
56.2426The Browns have no team history.FABSIX::E_MAXWELLThe torture never stops...Thu Oct 10 1996 09:537
56.2427ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 10 1996 14:335
56.2428IMBETR::DUPREZI need a favor, Don Cornelius...Thu Oct 10 1996 15:074
56.2429Any tird will do.STRATA::BTOWERThu Oct 10 1996 15:262
56.2430ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 10 1996 16:322
56.2431STRATA::BTOWERThu Oct 10 1996 17:121
56.2432BIGQ::MCKAYThu Oct 10 1996 17:1810
56.2433ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 10 1996 17:462
56.2434Thanks for the KOD Jimbo :>)STRATA::BTOWERThu Oct 10 1996 17:472
56.2435MSBCS::BRYDIEBen Coates the Princess of TE'sThu Oct 10 1996 17:558
56.2436ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 10 1996 18:226
56.2437CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Oct 10 1996 18:252
56.2438ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 10 1996 18:274
56.2439ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 10 1996 18:285
56.2440ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 10 1996 18:294
56.2441MSBCS::BRYDIEBen Coates the Princess of TE'sThu Oct 10 1996 18:3910
56.2442ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 10 1996 18:594
56.2443ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Nov 04 1996 16:443
56.2444EDWIN::WAUGAMANBurn Tempe to the GroundWed Nov 06 1996 11:007
56.2445IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Wed Nov 06 1996 11:476
56.2446CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Nov 06 1996 12:106
56.2447BRAT::taydhcp-23-144-238.tay.dec.com::LongWtaxation without representationWed Nov 06 1996 16:247
56.2448IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Wed Nov 06 1996 16:393
56.2449EDWIN::WAUGAMANBurn Tempe to the GroundWed Nov 06 1996 16:5316
56.2450NQOS01::nqsrv227.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchThu Nov 07 1996 21:028
56.2451You exaggerate... ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANBurn Tempe to the GroundFri Nov 08 1996 11:3010
56.2452SUBPAC::SKALSKIA reclined state of mindFri Nov 08 1996 12:3110
56.2453CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Nov 08 1996 13:1411
56.245410 or 11HBAHBA::HAASbut the reply came from AnchorageFri Nov 08 1996 13:179
56.2455PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Fri Nov 08 1996 13:392
56.2456way to go!HBAHBA::HAASbut the reply came from AnchorageFri Nov 08 1996 13:449
56.2457PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Fri Nov 08 1996 13:503
56.2458MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::LongWtaxation without representationMon Nov 25 1996 15:348
56.2459Packer Fan In DisguiseYIELD::BARBIERIMon Nov 25 1996 15:581
56.2460PECAD8::CHILDSMon Nov 25 1996 16:312
56.2461unless of course you care to duck.......CNTROL::CHILDSFri Dec 06 1996 12:446
56.2462MSBCS::BRYDIEJust cover, baby!Fri Dec 06 1996 15:205
56.2463CNTROL::CHILDSFri Dec 06 1996 15:302
56.2464CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Dec 06 1996 15:537
56.2465MSBCS::BRYDIEJust cover, baby!Mon Dec 16 1996 13:0622
56.2466PECAD8::CHILDSMon Dec 16 1996 13:162
56.2467CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Dec 16 1996 13:4910
56.2468Nice Spit wad from Sinbad in the First KidMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Dec 16 1996 14:2410
56.2469Drew didn't step up in a big game - againTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruiserball!Mon Dec 16 1996 14:273
56.2470Huh?2975::WAUGAMANMon Dec 16 1996 14:3212
56.2471Got to be important to players, not fansMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Dec 16 1996 14:4810
56.24722975::WAUGAMANMon Dec 16 1996 14:5316
56.2473MSBCS::BRYDIEJust cover, baby!Mon Dec 16 1996 15:0716
56.2474just wait til nexted yearHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 16 1996 15:164
56.2475PECAD8::CHILDSFri Dec 20 1996 13:049
56.2476MSBCS::BRYDIEJust cover, baby!Fri Dec 20 1996 13:122
56.2477PECAD8::CHILDSFri Dec 20 1996 17:284
56.2478CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Dec 20 1996 17:431
56.2479Ok I said the same about HolyfieldMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Dec 20 1996 17:597
56.2480CNTROL::CHILDSReeves in 97Mon Dec 23 1996 16:4911
56.2481PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Mon Dec 30 1996 12:2910
56.2482getting technical?HBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 30 1996 12:435
56.2483and I don't delete my old posts...IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Dec 30 1996 13:0013
56.2484I'm pumped-- let's get it on!EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Dec 30 1996 13:0520
56.2485'course they did say BUTTS on the back...SALEM::DODAHow could we know that promises end?Mon Dec 30 1996 13:099
56.2486It's not just football-- it's Steelers' footballEDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Mon Dec 30 1996 13:1517
56.2487CNTROL::CHILDSReeves in 97Mon Dec 30 1996 13:417
56.2488plenty of Coates shirts available, tooIMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Dec 30 1996 13:4315
56.2489CNTROL::CHILDSReeves in 97Mon Dec 30 1996 13:465
56.2490SLEEPER HOLD!IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Dec 30 1996 13:501
56.2491IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Dec 30 1996 13:5320
56.2492and barsCNTROL::CHILDSReeves in 97Mon Dec 30 1996 15:325
56.2493IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Dec 30 1996 15:392
56.2494BIGQ::MCKAYMon Dec 30 1996 15:448
56.2495PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Mon Dec 30 1996 16:397
56.2496IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Dec 30 1996 16:536
56.2497some summaryHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 30 1996 17:077
56.2498PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Mon Dec 30 1996 17:082
56.2499way back whenHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 30 1996 17:166
56.2500IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Dec 30 1996 17:316
56.2501SNAX::ERICKSONMon Dec 30 1996 17:3113
56.2502rooting for ever bodyHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 30 1996 17:5126
56.2503Back a the bus... EDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Mon Dec 30 1996 17:5813
56.2504keep on movin onHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 30 1996 18:0216
56.2505Just Plain NastyEDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Mon Dec 30 1996 18:1220
56.2506won't have both of 'emHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 30 1996 18:169
56.2507man gettin in here late sucksAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Dec 30 1996 20:304
56.2508MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Longtaxation without representationTue Dec 31 1996 12:147
56.2509nothing more, nothing lessMKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Longtaxation without representationTue Dec 31 1996 12:427
56.2510the key matchups...IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Tue Dec 31 1996 12:459
56.2511MSBCS::BRYDIEJust cover, baby!Tue Dec 31 1996 12:525
56.2512IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Tue Dec 31 1996 13:083
56.2513CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Dec 31 1996 13:188
56.2514PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Tue Dec 31 1996 13:245
56.2515EDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Tue Dec 31 1996 13:2712
56.2516PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Tue Dec 31 1996 13:2833
56.2517RE: .2515IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Tue Dec 31 1996 14:172
56.2518I'll sayMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Jan 02 1997 17:357
56.2519EDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Thu Jan 02 1997 17:588
56.2520Oh Yeah!YIELD::BARBIERISun Jan 05 1997 17:136
56.2521what a beating...IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Jan 06 1997 11:5515
56.2522One scared Pats fanWONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Mon Jan 06 1997 12:1412
56.2523last team with the ball wins...IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Jan 06 1997 12:4913
56.2524re: dark sidePECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 06 1997 12:584
56.2525IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Jan 06 1997 13:1611
56.2526Go Pats!PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Mon Jan 06 1997 13:252
56.2527what kind of reasoning is that?WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Mon Jan 06 1997 13:414
56.2528I shall be releasedHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyMon Jan 06 1997 13:5110
56.2529ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 06 1997 14:062
56.2530jumping on ever bandwagonHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyMon Jan 06 1997 14:198
56.2531SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jan 06 1997 14:5018
56.2532PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 06 1997 15:283
56.2533BIGQ::MCKAYMon Jan 06 1997 15:388
56.2534a little lowHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyMon Jan 06 1997 15:4113
56.2535PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 06 1997 15:421
56.2536WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Mon Jan 06 1997 15:5623
56.2537BIGQ::MCKAYMon Jan 06 1997 16:1912
56.2538SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jan 06 1997 16:2614
56.2539TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jan 06 1997 16:278
56.2540why switch nowHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyMon Jan 06 1997 16:315
56.2541the lasted timeHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyMon Jan 06 1997 16:36160
56.2542PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 06 1997 17:0913
56.2543keep them overs comingHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyMon Jan 06 1997 17:130
56.2544and no I was not in lineMKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBTue Jan 07 1997 11:1212
56.2545MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 07 1997 13:054
56.2546EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdTue Jan 07 1997 13:2817
56.2547PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Tue Jan 07 1997 22:173
56.2548MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 07 1997 22:323
56.2549IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Wed Jan 08 1997 11:204
56.2550PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 08 1997 11:272
56.2551MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBWed Jan 08 1997 11:325
56.2552Lets Hope He StaysBRAT::FORTIN_CWhere's the Spirit, Where's the GutsWed Jan 08 1997 11:386
56.2553what the hail?HBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyWed Jan 08 1997 12:079
56.2554EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 12:1315
56.2555what's this all about?HBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyWed Jan 08 1997 12:32110
56.2556ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jan 08 1997 12:413
56.2557CNN storyHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyWed Jan 08 1997 12:5190
56.2558MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manWed Jan 08 1997 13:1324
56.2559MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manWed Jan 08 1997 13:147
56.2560EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 13:1712
56.2561big boss days numbered?HBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyWed Jan 08 1997 13:1817
56.2562MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 08 1997 13:215
56.2563Definitely not 'boys fans-- far too thuggishEDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 13:2215
56.2564all this fuss over tickets to a lossPECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 08 1997 13:314
56.2565MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manWed Jan 08 1997 14:0223
56.2566CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Jan 08 1997 14:0710
56.2567EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 14:0919
56.2568MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBWed Jan 08 1997 14:158
56.2569MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manWed Jan 08 1997 14:1912
56.2570ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jan 08 1997 14:563
56.2571EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 14:589
56.2572Best jab at Boston so far! :^)WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Wed Jan 08 1997 15:41139
56.2573SALEM::DODAChairman of the BoredWed Jan 08 1997 15:535
56.2574another vote for TF GreenPHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Wed Jan 08 1997 16:4116
56.2575MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manWed Jan 08 1997 16:595
56.2576SALEM::DODAChairman of the BoredWed Jan 08 1997 17:496
56.2577PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 08 1997 18:158
56.2578WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSWed Jan 08 1997 18:265
56.2579ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jan 08 1997 19:024
56.2580But that was it-- the rest was fun, I loved it...EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 19:0211
56.2581It ain't that bad...EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 19:1517
56.2582MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manWed Jan 08 1997 19:248
56.2583MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBWed Jan 08 1997 19:2511
56.2584WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Wed Jan 08 1997 19:285
56.2585It's fun being a moronEDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 19:3013
56.2586Bad winners, try some softball teamsMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 08 1997 19:3514
56.2587singing in the rainPECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 08 1997 20:295
56.2588IT'S DESERVEDFABSIX::R_LUCHT&quot;Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof&quot;Thu Jan 09 1997 02:047
56.2589IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Thu Jan 09 1997 11:0611
56.2590MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBThu Jan 09 1997 11:1413
56.2591EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdThu Jan 09 1997 12:0313
56.2592CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jan 09 1997 12:178
56.2593the Slimfast was Spiked!PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingThu Jan 09 1997 12:293
56.2594Stuff happensMSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 09 1997 13:3410
56.2595MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 09 1997 13:416
56.2596PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingThu Jan 09 1997 13:471
56.2597alcohol and testostorne are one nasty mixture!MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBThu Jan 09 1997 13:5213
56.2598PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Thu Jan 09 1997 13:531
56.2599exFRSBEE::GROVESThu Jan 09 1997 13:5320
56.2600MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBThu Jan 09 1997 14:0115
56.2601PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingThu Jan 09 1997 14:272
56.2602MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBThu Jan 09 1997 15:4313
56.2603SNAX::ERICKSONThu Jan 09 1997 16:146
56.2604reality is something elseMKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBThu Jan 09 1997 16:436
56.26054 hours ?FRSBEE::GROVESThu Jan 09 1997 17:4210
56.2606SCAMP::FORTIN_CWhere's the Spirit, Where's the GutsThu Jan 09 1997 17:523
56.2607WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Thu Jan 09 1997 17:5920
56.2608Let's get them all out CSLALL::BRULEScooter Macgruder rulesMon Jan 13 1997 10:587
56.2609PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 13 1997 11:568
56.2610BIGQ::MCKAYMon Jan 13 1997 12:184
56.2611CRUSH THEM PATSIES!!!!BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOMon Jan 13 1997 12:277
56.2612X-files material?ODIXIE::ZOGRANIt's around here somewhereMon Jan 13 1997 12:3516
56.2613PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 13 1997 13:027
56.2614Mikey the HLO legend!!!!BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOMon Jan 13 1997 13:1010
56.2615had carolina yesterday........PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 13 1997 14:080
56.2616SUBPAC::SKALSKIA reclined state of mindMon Jan 13 1997 14:149
56.2617GO PACK!!!YIELD::BARBIERIMon Jan 13 1997 14:165
56.2618way to goHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Mon Jan 13 1997 14:203
56.2619PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Mon Jan 13 1997 14:267
56.2620WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSMon Jan 13 1997 14:3810
56.2621gotta do betterHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Mon Jan 13 1997 14:4216
56.2622WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSMon Jan 13 1997 14:449
56.2623SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jan 13 1997 14:4810
56.2624dome teams are badHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Mon Jan 13 1997 14:488
56.2625just the messenger...HBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Mon Jan 13 1997 15:41109
56.2626CSLALL::BRULEScooter Macgruder rulesMon Jan 13 1997 16:048
56.2627pats 28, packers 21ALASKA::LAFOSSEWHEN THE BULLET HITS THE BONE...Mon Jan 13 1997 16:098
56.2628Get the boys goingWILLEE::MAILLOUXMon Jan 13 1997 16:287
56.2629WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Mon Jan 13 1997 16:2819
56.2630PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Mon Jan 13 1997 16:296
56.2631Huh???YIELD::BARBIERIMon Jan 13 1997 16:3211
56.2632One-Two PunchPCBUOA::EHSMon Jan 13 1997 16:433
56.2633Not Enough Output, I SupposeYIELD::BARBIERIMon Jan 13 1997 16:5110
56.2634ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 13 1997 17:006
56.2635Pats 31-GB 27...WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSMon Jan 13 1997 17:1110
56.2636ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 13 1997 17:153
56.2637WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSMon Jan 13 1997 17:176
56.2638CSLALL::BRULESmack the PackMon Jan 13 1997 17:195
56.2639NQOS01::nqsrv212.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchPee Wee Herman's bodydoubleMon Jan 13 1997 17:422
56.2640easy overHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Mon Jan 13 1997 17:4510
56.2641PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Mon Jan 13 1997 18:272
56.2642Not SureYIELD::BARBIERIMon Jan 13 1997 18:4214
56.2643ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 13 1997 18:422
56.2644PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Mon Jan 13 1997 18:472
56.2645Not TrueYIELD::BARBIERIMon Jan 13 1997 18:521
56.2646just a coincidence :^)WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Mon Jan 13 1997 19:097
56.2647SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jan 13 1997 20:1511
56.2648MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Jan 13 1997 20:232
56.2649OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportMon Jan 13 1997 20:393
56.2650MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Jan 13 1997 20:436
56.2651More NitsYIELD::BARBIERIMon Jan 13 1997 21:584
56.2652NQOS01::nqsrv210.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchPee Wee Herman's bodydoubleMon Jan 13 1997 23:314
56.2653ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jan 14 1997 11:497
56.2654I'm sure he's got extra duct tape for his anklesMKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationTue Jan 14 1997 11:515
56.2655PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingTue Jan 14 1997 12:0110
56.2656EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 14 1997 12:218
56.2657Say It Isn't So!YIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 14 1997 12:364
56.2658MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 14 1997 15:138
56.2659It had to be saidPECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingTue Jan 14 1997 15:164
56.2660MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 14 1997 15:356
56.2661MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 14 1997 15:365
56.2662Stirring Things UpYIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 14 1997 16:2919
56.2663IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Tue Jan 14 1997 17:063
56.2664MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 14 1997 17:4421
56.2665Lies, Lies, and More Lies From Tommy "Big Nose" Brydie!!!YIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 14 1997 18:0737
56.2666WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSTue Jan 14 1997 18:1414
56.2667I AgreeYIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 14 1997 19:024
56.2668EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 14 1997 19:1022
56.2669MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 14 1997 19:1215
56.2670MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 14 1997 19:4117
56.2671SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jan 14 1997 19:5628
56.2672PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingTue Jan 14 1997 19:566
56.2673Still A Fine Defense ThoYIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 14 1997 20:358
56.2674Good NoteYIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 14 1997 20:363
56.2675how to stop a pass attack by Bill ParcellsPHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Tue Jan 14 1997 22:2916
56.2676Misc.YIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 14 1997 22:4812
56.2677PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Wed Jan 15 1997 00:062
56.2678MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 15 1997 12:2913
56.2679PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Wed Jan 15 1997 12:592
56.2680Packers all the way!!!BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOWed Jan 15 1997 13:029
56.2681PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 15 1997 13:0711
56.2682PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Wed Jan 15 1997 13:131
56.26837 points Mike, how early is it out there??BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOWed Jan 15 1997 13:181
56.2684PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Wed Jan 15 1997 13:352
56.2685Which Is It???YIELD::BARBIERIWed Jan 15 1997 14:1810
56.2686Even The QB Matchup, Huh???YIELD::BARBIERIWed Jan 15 1997 14:207
56.2687Take the bait; it's funEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 15 1997 14:2210
56.2688WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSWed Jan 15 1997 14:3917
56.2689MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 15 1997 14:429
56.2690it is fun, thoughMKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationWed Jan 15 1997 14:447
56.2691He's back, to the benefit of the PackEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 15 1997 14:5425
56.2692SNAX::ERICKSONWed Jan 15 1997 14:569
56.2693WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSWed Jan 15 1997 14:5610
56.2694Shut up Chappy...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 15 1997 14:571
56.2695MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 15 1997 14:5712
56.2696Nice down paymentCSLALL::BRULESmack the PackWed Jan 15 1997 14:5810
56.2697domed games give them problemsSALEM::DODAOne World within....Wed Jan 15 1997 15:045
56.2698those 70s monday night football gamesMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 15 1997 15:079
56.2699MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 15 1997 15:1922
56.2700MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 15 1997 15:308
56.2701WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSWed Jan 15 1997 15:463
56.2702EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 15 1997 16:086
56.2703CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsWed Jan 15 1997 16:0811
56.2704MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 15 1997 16:1010
56.2705Where Illogic ReignsYIELD::BARBIERIWed Jan 15 1997 16:1513
56.2706Misc.YIELD::BARBIERIWed Jan 15 1997 16:2529
56.2707PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 15 1997 16:347
56.2708More Misc.YIELD::BARBIERIWed Jan 15 1997 16:369
56.2709THE MIGHTY 'GREEN BAY PRESS GAZETTE'!!!YIELD::BARBIERIWed Jan 15 1997 16:384
56.2710PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 15 1997 16:385
56.2711of courseYIELD::BARBIERIWed Jan 15 1997 16:381
56.2712EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 15 1997 16:388
56.2713MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 15 1997 16:4312
56.2714covering all bases, eh?MKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationWed Jan 15 1997 16:5012
56.2715MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 15 1997 16:593
56.2716MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 15 1997 17:007
56.2717Can't have one without the otherIMINMK::SILVESTRIPenuts Gang turns 10 in 1997!Wed Jan 15 1997 17:0130
56.2718Bang BangYIELD::BARBIERIWed Jan 15 1997 17:066
56.2719EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 15 1997 17:2215
56.2720never bet with your heartMKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationWed Jan 15 1997 17:386
56.2721MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 15 1997 17:4114
56.2722PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 15 1997 19:448
56.2723Fassell no longer avail.MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 15 1997 20:056
56.2724Can you say...."sacrificial lamb"???FABSIX::D_HORTERTThu Jan 16 1997 01:4613
56.2726Steelers lose by 50FABSIX::R_LUCHT&quot;Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof&quot;Thu Jan 16 1997 10:2212
56.2727New England 35 greeen bay 31FABSIX::E_MAXWELLThe torture never stops...Thu Jan 16 1997 10:3918
56.2728Need a p-name, DJ?MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 16 1997 12:2017
56.2729SNAX::ERICKSONThu Jan 16 1997 12:288
56.2730When it's the last game of the yearPECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingFri Jan 17 1997 16:3962
56.2731MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Fri Jan 17 1997 17:012
56.2732Tuna TriviaIMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Fri Jan 17 1997 17:268
56.2733PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingFri Jan 17 1997 18:015
56.2734NQOS01::nqsrv244.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchPee Wee Herman's bodydoubleSun Jan 19 1997 02:5811
56.2735One Was Pretty Lucky (imo)YIELD::BARBIERISun Jan 19 1997 14:428
56.2736nice timing, eh?MKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationMon Jan 20 1997 11:147
56.2737CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jan 20 1997 11:548
56.2738contents are the opinion of the sender not the posterMKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationMon Jan 27 1997 02:5328
    One of ya cain post this mail in  SPROTS, if'n ya will.
    
    Gawd I loved this Super Bowl, except for the 5 minutes or so the Pats
    actually tried to make a game of it.
    
    Bledsoe showed how mediocre a QB he really is. Pressure him and he'll
    put it up fer grabs.  (Not that anybody the STEELERS have right now is 
    any better.)
    
    Curtis Martin was a malingerer at Pitt, and I was glad he didn't get a
    ring with the Pats. 
    
    Hey, the rumor is that Parcells is gone from the Pats.  I hear Bruce
    Kotite is willing to pay to get the Pats coaching job.(8^)*
    
    Oh well, like 28 other teams fans are saying, and have been saying for
    a while, there's always nexted year, huh??  HAHAHAHAHA!!
    
    I normally root for the AFC team, but I couldn't stand the thought of
    such a lousy team, who caught the STEELERS on the occasional down day,
    possibly winning the big game.
    
    Later
    
    
    JaKe
     
    
56.2739MKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationMon Jan 27 1997 02:5914
    I really though the Pats had a chance until the Peon-wannabe,
    Desmond Howard ran that kickoff back.  That was the final
    straw that seemed to take all the wind out of the sails of 
    the Pats.  
    
    All in all a good game, but it'll unfortunately be remembered
    as just one more NFC win. 
    
    I imagine it'll be kinda quiet in here tomorrow.  I'll check
    in as much as I can.  The wifey is in the hospital so I'll be
    working from home for the nexted few days.
    
    
    billl
56.2740CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Jan 27 1997 11:4515
                                       2222
                                    222    222
                                  222        222
                                 222          222
                                              222
                                             222
                                           222
                                         222
                                       222
                                     222
                                   222
                                 222
                                 222
                                 222222222222222
                                 222222222222222
56.2741CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Jan 27 1997 11:4815
  First the Braves, now the Pats. Two is getting to be a familiar number.

  Well said about that final run back. Even then the Pats had the ball down
two touchdowns with plenty of time left on the clock. They could have gone
down the field for a score, got the ball back and run it in again in Heidi
game style but somehow their 5 man offensive line that had given Bledsoe good
protection earlier in the game couldn't hold back a 3 man rush.

  Then the got the ball back again within the 2 minute warning and same thing.

  Still when you figure in what people were saying at the start of the season
and even what some people were saying with 3-4 weeks to go, an A.F.C. title
isn't bad. I know I'm going to go hunt up a cap.

  George
56.2742IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Jan 27 1997 12:2926
    
    some opinions:
    
    1) Obviously the back-breaker was the Howard return, but the real
       problem was the defensive backfield getting toasted deep to a 
       nice golden brown.  The Packers couldn't run, but discovered after
       a while that they didn't have to.
    
    2) Desmond Howard was a jerk, is a jerk, and always will be a jerk.
    
    3) The Packers winning doesn't bother me, because it means Reggie White
       gets a ring.  Unfortunately, it also means Howard gets a ring, too,
       but what the hey.  The Packer team in general seems to be a class
       act.
    
    4) Willie Clay took the stupidest penalty I have *ever* seen, at *any*
       level.
    
    5) The WBCN folks said that Bledsoe played OK.  Bill Parcells said that
       Bledsoe played OK.  I must be on a different planet.  The first INT
       wasn't bad - a great play by the d-back.  The last two were
       ATROCIOUS.
    
    6) Things for the Pats to look for in free agency/the draft:
    		o  offensive linemen
    		o  a big-time cornerback
56.2743CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jan 27 1997 12:3911
>    
>   5) The WBCN folks said that Bledsoe played OK.  Bill Parcells said that
>       Bledsoe played OK.  I must be on a different planet.  The first INT
>       wasn't bad - a great play by the d-back.  The last two were
>       ATROCIOUS.
>    

The last two were forced, while he was trying to make something happen.


Bledsoe played OK.  To win that game, though, sometimes you have to play GREAT.
56.2744CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Jan 27 1997 12:464
  Which is what the Pack did.

  George
56.2745ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 27 1997 12:471
    CHOKE
56.2746CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jan 27 1997 12:4835
When I first started watching football, a little over thirty years ago, I loved
two teams -- the Packers and the Giants.  Now to some, that would be roughly
akin to me saying "Daddy, I like the Yankees and the Red Sox," for which I
would have been thoroughly chastised by my father.  (Fortunately, I think there
is a gene that allows one but not the other when it comes to those two teams.)
But when you're eight, and you like a team, you just like it, never mind who
their rivals are.


Having been a Giants fan over the years, I've grown to love Bill Parcells,
arguably one of the very best coaches in the game today.

So, last night's game was interesting for me -- I couldn't lose, really.  I
guess I felt like a parent with a kid on each team.  Turns out, I though it was
a REALLY good *GAME*.  

Wasn't a blowout, and until Desmond Howard returned the kickoff, the Pats never
stopped trying to claw their way back in it.  The momentum shifted several
times, and each team had moments of brilliance, and moments of stupidity.

The Packers were the more mature team, and I think that counts a lot when it
comes to the Super Bowl -- they'd been closer to getting their before, and
WANTED it so badly.  The Pats got there, and in a lot of ways, just getting
there was, IMO, a big thing to them....

If Parcells were to stay with the Pats -- unlikely I think, because he's going
to be coaching the <ugh!> Jets, they'd get there again and win it.


Condolences to the Pats fans, it was a great season, and I said a few years
back that Parcells would get the team to the Super Bowl.  Congrats to the
Packer fans -- the team added another building block to the legacy.....


'Saw
56.2747SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jan 27 1997 12:505
    RE .2745,
    
    	Watching the Pats yesterday reminded me of the Tribe.
    
    Ron
56.2748Congrats to the PackSALEM::DODALife's a meeting. Get on the agenda!Mon Jan 27 1997 12:5411
Roland,

I'll certainly second that Desmond Howard is a jerk comment. He's 
a class-a a$$hole. The refs should've thrown a flag for taunting 
on that first return when he basically went into the Patriots 
bench and started trash-talking. Rison and Howard give anyone a 
perfectly good reason to hate this team. Too bad, because the 
rest of this team seems to be a bunch of great ballplayers who 
keep their piehole shut and play ball.

daryll
56.2749Blame Parcells if anyone-- you can't throw every single downEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jan 27 1997 13:0333
    
>    5) The WBCN folks said that Bledsoe played OK.  Bill Parcells said that
>       Bledsoe played OK.  I must be on a different planet.  The first INT
>       wasn't bad - a great play by the d-back.  The last two were
>       ATROCIOUS.
    
    The last two were atrocious?  Are you not counting the last one, where
    the ball was in Brisby's hands, but the DB unloaded on him with that 
    monster hit?
    
    The INTs were overrated, on the whole, as far as establishing field
    position and setting the Pack up.  The second one was a bomb that was 
    as good as a punt, no disaster with the game still at 20-14.  The third 
    one was worse, another back-foot job, but similar in that it was a bomb, 
    coming at a point in the 4th quarter when Pats were already desperate.  
    You have to consider game situations, and that Bledsoe did not look 
    like some scared pup out there on the whole even though the Pats had no 
    running game (Parcells gave up on it too early-- he should not have 
    wanted this kind of a shootout, and he could have prevented the
    Packers' killer 17-point second quarter).  Bledsoe did step up with 
    some nicely thrown balls on several occasions.
    
    I expect some criticism of Bledsoe because he didn't deliver in
    bringing the Pats back when needed, but the game was lost when the 
    defense put up absolutely no resistance while killing the Pats' 
    momentum in turning a 14-10 lead into a 27-14 deficit (and yes, to
    a lesser extent the special teams for giving up the kickoff return
    TD-- the mid-field coverage guys did not stay in their lanes).
    But all in all he was not the key he was supposed to be, one way 
    or the other.
    
    glenn
    
56.2750MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Jan 27 1997 13:0415

      With Drew Bledsoe I could live with stupid. And he is
     stupid. What I can't brook is scared. Steve Grogan was 
     prone to stupid plays but he had a big heart and would 
     take a hit to try and make a play. Bledsoe, on the other 
     hand, will put it up for grabs and turn away from the rush 
     so it's anybody's ball. Stupid and scared. Poor combination.
     And yes, Howard's play was huge. The Pats worked for their 
     td and Pack shows them how easy they can take it right
     back. Ouch. Then when he starts smelling a ring, Reggie
     White tossed Max Lane around like a Raggedy Ann doll.
     Between Bledsoe and the porr special teams play, we just
     weren't ready.
    
56.2751MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Jan 27 1997 13:0812
    

  >> The second one was a bomb that was as good as a punt, no 
  >> disaster with the game still at 20-14.  The third one was 
  >> worse, another back-foot job, but similar in that it was a bomb, 
  >> coming at a point in the 4th quarter when Pats were already desperate.  
    
     The second one I'll give you. It was essentially as good as apunt. 
     The third one was a back breaker. There was still about 7 minutes
     left and down by 14 points isn't too much to ask of an offense like
     the Patsies'. They still had a chance until he lofted it like he 
     tends to do under pressure.
56.2752SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jan 27 1997 13:0920
    
    	For starters congrats to the Pack. Bledsoe played okay but not
    great. He had 4 int's, 1 was a good play by a db (still should have
    been avoided), the other 3 were on deep patterns essentially just as
    good as punts. Getting down by 10 quick and early didn't hurt them,
    they responded well and came back with 14 of there own. Yeah, they gave
    up a 54 yrd TD pass but sometimes that happens. What really started
    there down fall was the 81 yrd pass to Freeman. Favre picked up the
    blitz and audibled, then threw a great pass. The Pats didn't respond
    to the 81 yrd TD and gave up 10 more pts. So they got outscored 17-0
    in the 2nd qrt, which killed them. Only down 13 they were able to
    re-group at half time and came out strong, getting a TD to cut the lead
    to 6. Then Desmond Howard really burned them for a 99 yrd kick off
    return. Which was the ending, they came back from 10 down, didn't give
    up 13 down and cut it to 6. Then got burned again and couldn't recover
    for a 3rd time.
    	In the big play category it was GB 3 Patriots 0. Pats needed a GB
    turnover or a big play and it never happened.
    
    Ron
56.2753Stupor Bowl..GIAMEM::HOVEYMon Jan 27 1997 13:1515
    
    	Drew gets taken down by a D'back who grabs his shirt...afterall
    he' only 6'4....step into the pocket...don;t throw backing up....%^&*(
    
    	D'backs cost them, Special Teams cost them, Bledsoe cost them...he
    did throw 2 TD's but he also made plays that killed them.....how can a
    guy underthrow so many passes ? The game plan didn't help...let's
    see...throw the ball 2 yards and hope for a big play. All we heard was
    wait until their wideouts get on the turf, they'll burn G.B., it was
    the other way around... The Pat's D'line did a great job for the most
    part...this game could have been won.
    
    	Howards totals almost matched the entire Pats offense.....and what 
    jerks some of the G.B. players are...
    
56.2754ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 27 1997 13:222
    
    TWO WORDS -----> CHOKE!
56.2755CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jan 27 1997 13:2524
I don't think that the Patriots are as "mature" a team as the Packers.

The Packers have been in the hunt for the last three or four seasons,
continually honing what they needed to do to win.  I remember late last season,
the Packers talking about their opening day loss to St. Louis which cost them
HFA and ultimately having to go to the Dallas County Jail to play for the NFC
crown.

They fixed that this season.


The Patriots on the other hand were molded into a good team, who got some
breaks and there along the way, and made it to the big game.

Now, it's just my opinion, but if Parcells were to stay, the team would begin
to mature.  A loss in the Super Bowl or previous year's conference championship
game is mighty big motivation to work even harder the next year, and to make
those little tweaks and adjustments which give you the big plays you need.

But, with Parcells and Kraft at odds, I don't see Parcells returning to bring
the team to the Promised Land.....  Who know who the Pats would bring in....


'Saw
56.2756WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Mon Jan 27 1997 13:3421
    
    It wasn't just the interceptions with Drool...
    
    It was the $%$@#! tipped passes!  Doug Flutie got kicked off the
    team for that.  I guess "telegraphing passes" is an acceptable
    excuse for being tipped, but shortness isn't.
    
    Even when he had a couple of light years back in the pocket,
    he'd just watch one guy all the way.  No wonder defenses know
    when to put up their hands...
    
    A good game by Drew...  No way.  Not for $42.  We can that a
    good a game from QB's that come a dime a dozen...  After 4 years,
    we are stuck with an unimproving Drew, a stifling contract, and
    game-plan centered on a one-dimensional QB.  I'm sorry, I would
    rather have a multi-faceted QB who was a mediocre passer than
    Drew.  His fantastic arm and great passes to Glenn come at
    too high a price.
    
    - Sean
    
56.2757EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jan 27 1997 14:379
   
    For some reason, I guess Desmond Howard's antics don't bother me.
    I like him.  On the other hand, the last thing we needed to see was
    Mister Zero-Humility, Andre "Bad Moon" Rison achieving "vindication"
    against all those who have so maliciously put upon him over the years.  
    He'll be very hard to live with now...
    
    glenn
     
56.2758SALEM::DODALife's a meeting. Get on the agenda!Mon Jan 27 1997 14:395
My brother had a classic. Someone, maybe Madden, said something 
about how the Patriots should be afraid of Rison and my brother 
comes out with, "Nope, it's his girlfriend they should fear."

I was rollling.
56.2759But my Packer note covers itMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Jan 27 1997 14:4025
    Well the biggest difference was coaching.  Holmgren adapted to
    everything and Parcells gave up big plays.  But Parcells made two big
    mistakes.
    
    	He chose not to develop the run and Green Bay had the patience to
    fall behind but stay with the run.  I saw this and my bias covered my
    good sense - eg no run => no victory and eventually the Packer D-line
    unloaded.
    
    	Desmond.  Parcells hounded his special teams and what did they do? 
    They woke this bum up, the same bum who was in the locker room taping
    up when the 2nd half of the 49er game started and Homgren almost killed
    him.  Let this guy sleep.
    
    Clay on "the stupidest penalty of all time".  Only one worse in my
    recall.  U.S. hockey team in 1980 has the gold medal in its grasp
    against Finland and some ingrate decides to get chippy to prove his
    manhood and goes to the penalty box.  As a Boston fan I die waiting for
    the inevitable which fortunately didn't happen as other karma
    prevailed.
    
    Finally a nit.  On the 99 Vinateri went to tackly Howard and was held.
    Would he have made the play - I DON'T CARE - CALL IT YOU NFC CHEATS!!!
    Drilled in the mind of these refs is don't affect the entertainment so
    let this little transgression go.  Bull.
56.2760Even game, except for turnovers and special teamsTNPUBS::NAZZAROBring back Coach Cal!Mon Jan 27 1997 14:4119
    So much for the "Parcells is a great preparation guy".  The Patriots
    were outcoached yesterday, pure and simple.  Not having the free safety
    helping out on the double wide set when your covering their fastest
    receiver with a safety is inexcusable.  Also inexcusable is totally
    abandoning the running game.  Curtis Martin only getting 11 carries was
    ridiculous.  He averaged 4 yards a carry, and showed signs of having a
    big day, but they never got him the ball.
    
    That said, turnovers and special teams won the game.  Brett Favre was
    slightly better than average, Bledsoe slightly worse.  Unfortunately
    for the Pats, their special teams did not play up to the level they
    displayed all year.  For some reason, they never put an all-out rush on
    the Green Bay punter.  A blocked punt would have been huge.  Any kind
    of turnover would have been, but the Pats forced none, and created no
    big plays themselves.  A very good season ends on a disappointing note,
    because in my opinion the Packers are not a much better football team 
    than the Pats, but they were just that much better to win yesterday.
    
    NAZZ
56.2761PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Mon Jan 27 1997 14:474
    Bret Favre wasn't any better his first 4 years.  It took a while for
    the light to come on with him.  I remember when he was one of the top
    INT passers in the league.  I'd give Drew a couple more years at
    least.
56.2762MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Jan 27 1997 14:5613
    
    re .2760
    
     That pretty much covers it. The Pack and Holmgren were a
    step ahead of the Pats all day from the very first TD. They
    showed the Pats the double tight end set, the Pats bit the 
    run and GB beats them up top. That pretty much set the tone.
    It looked like the Pats could drive on them but they were
    unwilling to committ to the run but instead fell in love
    with the screen pass because it worked *once*. The one good
    thing that will come of Parcells leaving is that Perkins will
    be gone, too.
     
56.2763not Martin's faultPHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Mon Jan 27 1997 14:574
    Martin may have had only 11 carries at 4 yards/carry, but half of that
    came on his TD run.  The OL simply wasn't opening the holes.
    
    Mike
56.2764SUBPAC::SKALSKIA reclined state of mindMon Jan 27 1997 15:0618
    
    
    	Congrats to the pack, with that outta the way.  It looked
    like a very Un-Parcells type of loss.  I mean there was still
    1 full quarter of football left and NE flat out gave up.
    The look of desperation, especially when Drew heaves it up
    for grabs.  Hello, it's only 14 points.  The o-line looked
    like they didn't care.  3 man rush and Bledsoe was gettin
    sacked left and right.  Earlier it was a 5+ man rush and he
    had time to clip his toenails ifn he wanted.   If it was anyone
    other than NE I'd have rooted for the Pack,  bein an Nfc GIants
    main myself.  Anyone other than the evil cowpokes or fairywhiners
    is still OK.  
    
    							Shark
    
    
    
56.2765ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 27 1997 15:132
    
    TWO MORE WORDS ---> DOUG FLUTIE SUCKS!
56.2766ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backMon Jan 27 1997 15:182
    
    TWO MORE WORDS ----> THE *PACK* IS BACK!
56.2767ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backMon Jan 27 1997 15:194
    
    Can't believe i had to wait so long for the Pack to win it all again,
    but it was worth the wait.
    
56.2768MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Jan 27 1997 15:192
    
      TWO WORDS ----> Baltimore Ravens!
56.2769NQOS01::nqsrv232.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchInside IntelMon Jan 27 1997 15:365
TWO MORE WORDS   ------->  Wasn't it good to see someone like Ernest 
Byner, who's been around forever, finally on a team good enough to make 
it to the Super Bowl? And he looked like he came ready to play, I'm not 
sure why they didn't go back to him, more.   
56.2770PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 27 1997 17:0711
 Well the first lady of Sports is appropriately dressed in Black today. Nuff
 to take a man's breath away, make him forget there was a game yesterday.

 Just about the time you boys must have thought Drew was finally going to
 become a man, reality set in. Parcells exposed him bad on his way out the
 door. How can you coach a QB you can't yell at, can't talk to cause he might
 crack in two. Patriots better find a Mike Shannan type guy to babysit their
 primadonna or they'll remain ringless..........

 mc 
56.2771CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Jan 27 1997 17:2916
  Well, Drew has his problems, but he's still the QB on the team that made it
to the Superbowl and lost because the defense gave up two long bombs and the
special team gave up a record setting return. 

  Take those away and the Pats would have won. Would you still be able to say
that this game proved Drew didn't have it or that he was exposed by Parcells? 

  Also I wonder how well Montana or any of the other greats would have driven
the team down the field with 3+ left to play if their 5 man front couldn't
stop a 3 man rush?

  The Pats got beat by a better team that played a great game and caught a
few breaks on the way. All it proves is that a better team who plays a great
game and catches a few breaks is more likely to win on any given Sunday.

  George
56.2772MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Jan 27 1997 17:4015
  >> Parcells exposed him bad on his way out the door. How can you coach 
  >> a QB you can't yell at, can't talk to cause he might crack in two. 
  >> Patriots better find a Mike Shannan type guy to babysit their
  >> primadonna or they'll remain ringless..........

     Mikey, I don't disagree with what you're saying. Parcells doesn't yell
     at Bledsoe because it only makes a bad situation worse. I think you're
     right *but* Parcells drafted Drew. He could have had Marvin Jones
     or Rick Mirer but he wanted Bledsoe. And I didn't hear Parcells piping
     up when the Patsies were getting ready to bust the vault for Bledsoe.
     The Pats could get Drew a babysitter and that might help but what he 
     really needs is the whole shot from the Wizard of Oz - the heart,
     the brain and some courage.
    
56.2773maybe come up with something yourself :pROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backMon Jan 27 1997 17:462
    
    TWO WORDS ---> COPY CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!
56.2774EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jan 27 1997 17:4815
    
>     Mikey, I don't disagree with what you're saying. Parcells doesn't yell
>     at Bledsoe because it only makes a bad situation worse. I think you're
>     right *but* Parcells drafted Drew. He could have had Marvin Jones
>     or Rick Mirer but he wanted Bledsoe.
    
    And they wouldn't have been in the Super Bowl.  Look at the season-long
    performance; there's no reason for major complaint with Bledsoe.
    
    The pay part is a different story.  Bledsoe is overpaid, no question.
    I guess I don't have enough information to know if that could have 
    been prevented (would he have been lost to free agency?)
    
    glenn
    
56.2775PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 27 1997 17:5713
 I don't fault Parcells for taking him. I'd have taken him too if all I had
 to go by was game film etc. He has a fantastic arm. Throw a bullet sure take
 some thing off it no problem. The Oz pacakage he needs is a tough one to
 diaganosis until you see him for a few years.

 Glenn, while Bledsoe has some gaudy numbers to display, he was woefully
 inconsistent all year long as well. For every game he won with his arm
 Martin or the defense won as many also. and in the biggest games of the
 the year he came up like crap. The defense clearly won the AFC championship
 and Martin the semi's.......

 mc
56.2776'nuff saidROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backMon Jan 27 1997 17:594
    
    The only guys who played good for the pats were Byers, Glenn and Tupa.
    Gee, what's the common thread?
    
56.2777MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Jan 27 1997 18:0512
    
      These aren't exactly new complaints about Bledsoe. It's
     not just that he didn't rise to it in the SB that's the
     beef. Nope, this is just another occasion when Drew couldn't 
     play error free in a big game. This just happened to be 
     the *biggest* game. He's great when things are rolling his
     way and he has all kinds of time but throw a little pressure
     and adversity his way and there's no telling what he'll do.
    
     BTW - Glenn, you forgot the "IMO" after your statement
           about how the Patsies wouldn't havebeen in SB without
           Bledsoe. It wasn't Drew that got us here. 
56.2778MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Jan 27 1997 18:065
    
  >> The only guys who played good for the pats were Byers, Glenn and Tupa.
    
     Ted Johnson had the best game of any Patriot.    
    
56.2779ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backMon Jan 27 1997 18:062
    
    ByrdBrain, you forgot the "IMO" after all of your statements.
56.2780EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jan 27 1997 18:1015
                                                       
>     BTW - Glenn, you forgot the "IMO" after your statement
>           about how the Patsies wouldn't havebeen in SB without
>           Bledsoe. It wasn't Drew that got us here. 
    
    I understand that.  You made a comment on Parcells' draft decision that 
    at least seemed to imply that the Pats would have been better off with 
    the direct substitution of Rick Mirer at QB.  IMO, the Pats would 
    not have been in the Super Bowl with Mirer at QB.  That seems evident,
    to me at least.  The Pats are not such a great team overall that
    they'd be able to overcome a mediocre QB.  Their QB had a part in the
    successes of this season.
    
    glenn
    
56.2781SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jan 27 1997 18:2022
    The big difference between QB's yesterday was experience in terms of 
    reading defenses. On the 54 yrd TD to Rison, Favre read the defense and 
    knew that Rison would be 1 on 1 with Otis Smith. Favre saw that Rison beat
    Smith easily and threw the ball, total time about 2 seconds. On the 81 Yrd
    TD, the same thing, Favre recongnized the blitz (Clay was going to Blitz).
    So he knew that Freeman would be 1 on 1 against Milloy in the middle. 
    Again since he already knew were his BEST matchup was, he didn't have to 
    analyze the defense before throwing, 2 seconds and bang TD. Clay was going
    to blitz and read the play but didn't react quick enough.
    	When a QB recongnizes the defense and picks his target, if that
    target is open at the snap of the ball. Forget it the pass will be
    completed 90% of the time. I fault Al Groh on the defense he was
    playing on both TD passes. Especially the 81 yrd TD, when the Pats were
    in there standard defense with 3 WR's on the field. The Pats got burned
    bad in the beginning of the season because they had no deep help with
    the safety's. Until GB was running the ball at will, he should have had
    the safety deep. The front 7 have been stopping the run pretty could
    the last few weeks. No reason for your safety to not be deep.
    
    Ron
    
    Ron
56.2782MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Jan 27 1997 18:429
    
      I don't know that Mirer would be a mediocre QB after four
     years under Tuna. He at least came from a *big* time program
     and has been through the fire. I do know that after four years 
     Bledsoe continues to make the same mistakes and his psyche is 
     as fragile as Laura's glass menagerie. I actually think Bledsoe
     is looking forward to Tuna leaving. He's a laidback guy and Tuna
     is anything but. A change of coaches might do him good. Then again,
     he might get a new coach and do all the same dumb things anyways.
56.2783CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jan 27 1997 18:519
    
|     Bledsoe continues to make the same mistakes and his psyche is 
|     as fragile as Laura's glass menagerie. I actually think Bledsoe

Tommy,

GREAT simile there.


56.2784PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 27 1997 19:024
I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who'll be happier than Drew when
Bill leaves. Maybe Bill himself but that's about it.

mc
56.2785Sam we sure could've used youMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Jan 27 1997 19:0518
    Well assuming Parcells leaves perhaps the offense will change and
    Bledsoe can't help welcoming any change - he just doesn't seem
    comfortable with the Perkins/Parcells approach.
    
    It does seem a reach but the more I think of it the more I'd like to
    ask Parcell's if he could have won the game with Sam Gash.  The point
    being that Parcell's probably didn't think he could run without Gash
    and didn't really try to.
    
    Now a top offensive lineman that can play the nfc 300lb'ers  would seem
    to be a need.  I have seen Bruce Smith from the outside, and Lawrence
    Taylor likewise, disrupt a quarterback but I can't recall a defensive
    lineman just going berserk and tossing tackles around like saplings.
    Bledsoe lost quite a few opportunities with pressures throughout then
    something would go wrong like a tip, a drop or a mis-throw.
    
    I do agree that Bledsoe doesn't have the fire of a Favre or Montana or
    a Grogan.
56.2786but he does have a grogan style brain.....PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingTue Jan 28 1997 11:420
56.2787SALEM::DODALife's a meeting. Get on the agenda!Tue Jan 28 1997 12:0712
Well, I don't think that Bledsoe played all that bad a game. In 
fact, I bet if you switched QB's, the outcome would be the same.
Bledsoe had no running game to set up the play action. His front 
five couldn't stop GB when they were sending 3 fer cripes sakes.
He threw 4 int, but two of those game when the game was all but 
done and everyone in the place knew he was putting it up. Why 
Martin didn't get anymore carries is beyond me. I'm not part of 
the "Drew Bledsoe, future HOFer" club, but he didn't play that 
badly. He was more of a victim of a lousy game plan and putrid 
special teams play than anything else.

daryll
56.2788EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 12:2413
    
> Well, I don't think that Bledsoe played all that bad a game. In 
> fact, I bet if you switched QB's, the outcome would be the same.
    
    I agree, at least under the circumstances of this game (Favre 
    wasn't asked to do that much).  But meanwhile, Favre is given all
    this credit for this incredible ability to find the right receiver
    against the blitz, when in both cases with Rison and Freeman his
    man was in the clear by 5+ yards.  Favre did his job, take nothing
    away there, but it didn't take much.
    
    glenn
    
56.2789SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jan 28 1997 12:259
    
    	I hope Parcells takes Al Groh with him. The team was already burned
    for a 54yrd TD and you fight back to take the lead 14-10. Then the
    idiot plays a base defense against 3 WR's. GB was not running the ball
    well at that point in time. There was no need for Willie Clay to be
    playing tight to the line of scrimmage. He should have been playing
    deep centerfield, so they couldn't get beat deep.
    
    Ron
56.2790SALEM::DODALife's a meeting. Get on the agenda!Tue Jan 28 1997 12:336
No kidding Ron. Someone should have mentioned to Willy that if 
you're going to play tight, it might behoove you to make contact 
with the WR rather than just letting him sprint by you. No 
bumping, no contact, nothing.

daryll
56.2791MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 28 1997 12:364
    
        Bledsoe would be getting the credit Favre is if he'd have hit
       Jefferson when he had a step instead of overthrowing him once 
       and underthrowing him twice both of which resulted in INTs. 
56.2792EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 12:378
    
    It was Lawyer Milloy that got burned man-to-man, not Clay (Clay was
    in position to blitz).  Major speed mismatch there.  Even as he was 
    catching the ball it appeared that Freeman was increasing the 
    distance between himself and Milloy.  Too easy...
    
    glenn
    
56.2793EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 12:3913
    
>       Bledsoe would be getting the credit Favre is if he'd have hit
>       Jefferson when he had a step instead of overthrowing him once 
>       and underthrowing him twice both of which resulted in INTs. 
    
    Yeah, I know, but none of those plays were the easy opportunities
    that Favre had.  Plus, the ball Bledsoe threw to Jefferson that 
    drew the interference call was beautifully thrown, as was the long
    one to Glenn.  But yeah, he threw 48 times and predictably wasn't
    near perfect...
    
    glenn
    
56.2794MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 28 1997 12:4610
    
    >> But yeah, he threw 48 times and predictably wasn't near 
    >> perfect...
    
       4 INTs and a 4.0 yards per pass avergae. I'd say that
       he wasn't even in the same galaxy as "near perfect".
       But I figured certain folks would be in here making
       excuses for him when he came up short in a big game 
       again.    
    
56.2795Just some fine-tuningTNPUBS::NAZZAROBring back Coach Cal!Tue Jan 28 1997 12:4717
    Now it's time to look forward to next year.  With Parcells (apparently)
    gone, the new man (whoever he is) will want to put his own mark on the
    team.  Given that, some of Parcell's high-priced talent will not be
    brought back next year, including the following Parcells players:  Dave
    Meggett, Ricky Reynolds, William Roberts, and Keith Byars.  Just
    getting rid of those four will open up over $5 million in salary cap
    money.  In addition, I look for Zolak to try to earn a starting job
    elsewhere, and with the success of Jefferson and Glenn, Brisby might
    also be gone.
    
    As for additions, it's obvious the Pats need a dominating defensive
    lineman.  They could use a cornerback, another offensive lineman, and
    some backfield depth.  But if they keep the nucleus of the team around,
    they should be back in the playoff hunt nexted season (unless they
    bring in Rich Kotite to coach!).
    
    NAZZ
56.2796EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 12:4913
    
>       But I figured certain folks would be in here making
>       excuses for him when he came up short in a big game 
>       again.    
    
    Ain't no need for excuses.  It ain't my team and the game went
    about how I expected.  I wasn't carrying on about how the Packers 
    were nothing special and how Brett Favre was going to choke.  But
    it is predictable that when none of that garbage came to pass 
    Bledsoe would somehow be the culprit...
    
    glenn
    
56.2797CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jan 28 1997 12:5116
I think Favre is a much better QB than Bledsoe, but on Sunday, his receivers
made it such that he didn't HAVE to be.

Bledsoe is a good QB.  Nothing that a little more maturing won't help.  Will he
ever be able to read defenses well?  I don't know -- some say that's a born
talent.

Pats got burned biggest on special teams, then on defense.  Belichick was
running the D when the Giants won their two Bowls, not Groh.  Groh was, at that
time I believe, the Linebackers coach.

If Parcells were to stay, I'd see the Pats winning the Bowl in the next
three or four years.  But I think Parcells is gone....


'Saw
56.2798MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 28 1997 12:538
  >> Bledsoe would somehow be the culprit...
    
     Bledsoe ain't the culprit. It was a team loss. Mainly, a 
     special teams loss really. But if anything was predictable 
     it was the Waugamanesque excuses that I alluded to last week 
     that would ensue if Drew didn't perform. And he didn't.
    
    
56.2799PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Jan 28 1997 13:386
|Bledsoe is a good QB.  Nothing that a little more maturing won't help.  Will he
|ever be able to read defenses well?  I don't know -- some say that's a born
|talent.
    
    I can't believe so many forget how bad Favre was once.  He developed
    the his skill for audiblizing; he wasn't always like this.
56.2800SALEM::DODALife's a meeting. Get on the agenda!Tue Jan 28 1997 13:4312
No kidding. Let's not forget that Farve has had outstanding WR, 
two pro-bowl TE's and a great running game and an excellent defense.
You think he'd be MVP type material in Atlanta?

He's Steve Bono. He looked great in SF and there were a dozen NFL 
teams that wanted him. Now that he's in KC and sans the great 
supporting cast, he's riding the bench in favor of Rich Gannon.

Farve is a great QB, the system and his supporting cast makes him 
so.

daryll
56.2801MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 28 1997 13:5613
    
      I'm not a big Favre fan either but Bledsoe has Curtis Martin, 
     Ben Coates, Terry Glenn, etc. Not exactly chopped liver. I don't 
     want to come off like Drew can do no right because there is that 
     camp amongst Patriot fans. I just want to see him play a smart 
     error-free game when it counts. I want to see him take over a big 
     game when we need him to do that. He hasn't yet. And I'm beginning 
     to think he never will. He makes the same mistakes over and over 
     and over. The four INTs, the tipped passes, the two yard dump offs
     when it's a 3rd and 10. It's enough to drive you nuts. He didn't 
     play well against the Jags in the AFC title game and he was subpar 
     in the SB. Like my old boss used to say, 'I want results not excuses.' 
    
56.2802MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 28 1997 13:5617
    It's looking more and more like Parcell's was indeed very much
    pre-occupied by his contract dilemma and this lack of focus penetrated
    to the team.  They played a fair game but when they needed the grit and
    determination to comeback they didn't have it.
    
    Parcell's got snookered and shafted just like he'd love to do if the
    positions were reversed.  His agent should go back to divorce cases but
    that's typical of any lay-lawyer relationship.  Regardless of the press
    lawyers (and doctors) put out everyone has to manage these kind of
    affairs and ask the stupid questions over and over again often with
    hands around the throat.
    
    All I can think of is Auerbach going to the Cincinatti Royals when
    Cousy, five years retired, wanted to play a few games to spark fan
    interest and demanding, and getting, compensation.  Parcell's problem
    is how much of the contract buyout and compensation from the Jets will
    limit the total financial package he gets.
56.2803A minor nuisanceEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 14:1211
        
>    Parcell's problem
>    is how much of the contract buyout and compensation from the Jets will
>    limit the total financial package he gets.
    
    Not much, if at all.  The $1.2M buyout is peanuts and you can bet 
    Leon Hess will pick up every penny of it on top of the agreed-upon
    deal...
    
    glenn
    
56.2804MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 28 1997 14:164
    
     The real kicker is the draft pick. If Parcells goes to a 
     division rival Kraft will want to tuck it to him by taking
     a nice draft pick.
56.2805BIGQ::MCKAYTue Jan 28 1997 14:207
    On the Freeman TD down the sideline, Clay was not tight to the line
    nor did he step forward to stop the run.  He was playing center field 
    flat footed and got a horrendously late start in getting over to
    help Milloy.  IMO the fault on that play goes to Milloy for not
    jamming Freeman on the line and Clay for terrible help.
    
    Jimbo
56.2806Quittin' on the verge...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 14:2317
             
>     The real kicker is the draft pick. If Parcells goes to a 
>     division rival Kraft will want to tuck it to him by taking
>     a nice draft pick.
    
    Yes, maybe their #2, a virtual late-1st rounder, possibly giving the 
    Pats overall picks #29 and #31.
    
    Parcells' if-I-don't-get-my-way-I'll-hit-the-road act has gotten real
    old.  Cut through all the he-said-she-said stuff, and his exodus 
    from a Super Bowl team with the kind of youth that the Pats have is
    unprecedented.  It should make any team question why they'd want to 
    deal with him in the first place (yeah, I know why they will anyway;
    he wins).
    
    glenn
    
56.2807SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jan 28 1997 14:2312
    re .2790,
    
    	Darryl, Willy Clay shouldn't have been at the line of scrimmage or
    even blitzing. With only 4 DB's and 3 WR's he should have been playing
    deep zone in the middle. With Clay not covering anybody all 3 WR's were
    1 on 1, with Freeman burning Milloy. If your going to blitz Clay from
    that formation. You have to use a LB to bump Freeman at the line, and
    then release him to Milloy. If not you should have your nickel defense
    in the game. It was a stupid defensive call by Al Groh for that time of 
    the game.
    
    Ron
56.2808SALEM::DODALife's a meeting. Get on the agenda!Tue Jan 28 1997 14:346
I'm not arguing with you Ron. My point was that if they did have 
him playing tight, he should at lkeast have jammed him at the 
line. Instead, he let him right by him and adios, he was off to 
the races.

daryll
56.2809better prepared???BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOTue Jan 28 1997 14:4113
    
    After reading all these replys....Did anyone ever consider that
    Parcells was just outcoached??  Holmgren was ready and had a plan
    for the time that the Pats would concentrate on stopping the run.
    
    Maybe Parcells was concentrating on his new contract etc. but in this
    game the Packers had a few surprises and they worked......The Pats
    D did what there coaching staff told them to do.  With the exception
    of getting beat deep, but I credit Favre and the coaching staff for 
    looking for those openings on the defensive set-up......and
    capitalizing on those mistakes.......Congrats to the Packers and there
    coaching staff for there execution of a better game plan.
    
56.2810Nazz pegged it.MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 28 1997 14:453
    
     Westie, see .2760.
    
56.2811MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 28 1997 14:4612
    I distinctly remember the guy chasing Freeman looking like me trying to
    catch young Phillip was "no-play" Clay.  The other was Malloy.  Otis
    Smith got burned I recall by Rison.
    
    I asked Glenn about Hitchcock who got a lot of grief but imho had the
    talent but had to learn the tricks.  eg how to do exactly what Dieon
    does but not take a penalty everytime.
    
    Although not decisive, the ability to get away with holding is the
    chief mark of the nfc teams.  I take it the Superbowl is a mixed
    afc/nfc crew.  The Pack went exclusively to the non Ty Law side it
    seemed all game.
56.2812BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOTue Jan 28 1997 14:477
    
    Thanks Tom,  hope it doesn't look that bad.....
    
    Good review Nazz, wish I thought of it.....
    
    /Westy 
    
56.2813Give it a rest alreadyEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 14:5418
    
>    Although not decisive, the ability to get away with holding is the
>    chief mark of the nfc teams.  I take it the Superbowl is a mixed
>    afc/nfc crew.
    
    BTW, after reviewing the tape, your complaint on that supposed holding
    of Vinatieri on the kickoff return is so lame that I can only say that 
    if it'd been made by a Steelers' fan, he'd be forever tagged with the
    worst kind of label as deluded whiner that this conference could 
    offer.  Funny thing is, in the postgame Parcells made the same 
    complaint.  The blocker put his hands on Vinatieri's upper back but
    immediately removed them, all of this occurring after Howard had 
    already spun him around and was long gone with no chance at a play.  
    If the officials were to call a penalty on that kind of play the 
    game would never end.
    
    glenn
    
56.2814re. Parcells outcoached by HolmgrenMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 28 1997 14:565
    Well you had at 10:03 yesterday
    
    >   EDWIN::WAUGAMAN     27-JAN-1997   56.2749  Blame Parcells if anyone--
    
    Not to speak of first sentence of .2759 to start the lunch barrage.
56.2815If Glenn says White then it's blackMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 28 1997 15:1311
    Well what are you saying did he illegally use the hands or not.  I saw
    it twice, never on slow, and the hands on the back (not patting it,
    Glenn; just what do you think the purpose of those hands was?) potentially 
    kept Vinateri from making a play.  Call the dang penalty you nfc
    stiff!!!
    
    Parcell's was probably pretty close to where the play happened.  You
    and your famous tape replays.  This is not to say that the play was
    decisive but Vinateri deserved a shot and Parcell's has gone to great
    lengths to teach his teams not to hold on plays like that so some
    "lame" call won't kill them.
56.2816what he saidHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Tue Jan 28 1997 15:2490
   
I'm smarter than Parcells

   By Mark Kreidler
   Special to ESPNET SportsZone

   NEW ORLEANS -- I can't believe it: I'm smarter than Bill Parcells.
   
   OK, I'm not smarter than Bill Parcells. On the other hand, I am. I
   can't decide.
   
   And in one of those astonishing beginning-of-the-column coincidences,
   neither could the Patriots. But since the subject at hand is Desmond
   Howard, the human can of WD-40, perhaps it is only appropriate. This
   is a guy who suddenly specializes in making people look like babbling
   towers of indecision.
   
   The New England Patriots elected to both punt and kick to Howard in
   Super Bowl XXXI on Sunday, which seems like a pretty good tactic so
   long as you haven't paid the slightest bit of attention to anything
   Howard has done all season.
   
   Of course, Parcells knows exactly what Howard has done. I mean, so do
   I. I can watch TV. And right there on my TV a couple of weeks ago, the
   poor San Francisco 49ers were getting their legacies handed to them in
   a cold bowl (wait: that was a cold Lambeau), with Howard just slicing
   them up on two huge returns that essentially decided the game.
   
   The man is murder. Heck, he's not even all that nice about it. As he
   was saying only recently (OK, it was about two hours ago), "There's an
   old saying that the cream always rises to the top."
   
   He meant himself. Creme Howard.
   
   Anyway, Parcells knew what he was getting into, which would seem to
   beg the question of why the Pats kicked to Howard anyway. Not to
   mention why, why, why, and, in a related question, why?
   
   "We were worried about him, but you can't cancel the game," Parcells
   said afterward.
   
   He was attempting to explain why the Patriots punted the ball to
   Howard even though, when you get right down to it, they knew better.
   They also kicked off to Howard, several times.
   
   The results: 154 yards in kickoff returns, including the 99-yard
   touchdown run that absolutely put this game away, and another 90 yards
   in punt returns.
   
   I get confused easily, but whose idea was this? You could tell that
   punter Tom Tupa's heart wasn't in it; he put his first punt over
   toward the left sideline, although utterly in bounds. Howard simply
   circled under the ball and blasted up the left side for a 32-yard gain
   to the Packers' 45; two plays later, it's 7-0, Green Bay.
   
   The kickoff you've already heard about, seen, read about and dissected
   to a sorry skeleton. We should cover politics this well. But the point
   is that the ball was anywhere near Desmond Howard on that kickoff --
   as opposed to, say, out of bounds and take your licks.
   
   "Like I said over the course of the two weeks before this game, they
   can roll the dice and kick it to me if they want, but I have full
   confidence in my return team that they're going to allow me to pop one
   sooner or later," said Howard. That popping noise you heard in the
   background was the Patriots' balloon.
   
   It's hard to get completely worked up about the Howard Conspiracy;
   after all, nobody necessarily expected Tupa to have to punt eight
   times.
   
   Me, I would have rolled that ball out of bounds eight straight times,
   taken my hits on the field position, and at least prevented Howard
   from making me look like a big dope on national TV. I mean, I can do
   that in the privacy of my own home.
   
   But maybe Parcells felt like he just ought to send that coverage unit
   out there and let 'er rip. The question only came up briefly Sunday
   night, because the coach -- a winner, by the way, an utterly bright
   man -- was so busy deflecting queries about his pending move to the
   New York Jets.
   
   To repeat: The man is reportedly leaving the Patriots, so solid and
   strong and guided by a quarterback who is not yet even 25 years old,
   for the 1-15 Jets.
   
   Say, maybe I am smarter than Bill Parcells.
   
   Mark Kreidler is a columnist for the Sacramento Bee, which has a web
   site at http://www.sacbee.com/.
   
56.2817SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jan 28 1997 15:3111
    
    	On the 81 yrd TD pass to Freeman, Willy Clay was suppose to blitz.
    Favre audibiled and Clay changed his mind. Problem is Clay didn't get
    back to the middle or deep enough. Which was partially caused by a
    quick 3 step drop by Favre.
    	As far as Parcells being outcoached. It just goes to show you that
    it isn't always a good idea for the head coach to also be the special
    teams coach. When does he have time to look at photos and make changes
    in coverage during the game? Halftime, and it still didn't help.
    
    Ron
56.2818SALEM::DODALife's a meeting. Get on the agenda!Tue Jan 28 1997 15:3210
I'm not going to argue with the column.

But "The cream always rises to the top." 

Yeah right, now let's see his WR stats for the past 3 years....

Did GB even try to start this guy at wideout when just about 
everyone was on the IR? 

daryll
56.2819EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 16:1112
    
>    Well what are you saying did he illegally use the hands or not.  
    
    I'm saying he didn't.  He barely made contact and I don't think he
    hindered Vinatieri at all.  I certainly don't know the rule verbatim
    but I suspect that there must be some "harm" for there to be a "foul".
    
    The only point to me seeing it again on replay is that I saw nothing
    out of the ordinary watching the play live the first time.
    
    glenn
    
56.2820ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backTue Jan 28 1997 17:022
    
    ByrdBrain, you forgot to put IMO after your comments.
56.2821PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Jan 28 1997 17:072
    Terry Glenn and Rodney Hampton are shining examples why Parcells needs
    a checks and balances system.
56.2822ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RTue Jan 28 1997 17:253
	As to whether the Tuna was out coached, I've seen two articles
	(one very insistent about it) suggesting that Desmond Howard bailed
	Mike Holmgren and company out of a bad game plan.
56.2823EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 17:3012
    
>	As to whether the Tuna was out coached, I've seen two articles
>	(one very insistent about it) suggesting that Desmond Howard bailed
>	Mike Holmgren and company out of a bad game plan.
    
    Just curious, where do the two very easy bombs for TDs fit into
    this "bad game plan"?  Howard supplied field position, the offense
    took what was given to them; it would appear that anything else is
    over-analysis...
    
    glenn
    
56.2824ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RTue Jan 28 1997 17:3811
	I think the main points were:

	(1) the GB defensive plan for almost the whole of the first half
	was just plain wrong;  (2) after the 10-0 lead, GB had a few series
	that they started in their own territory, and were very predictable
	(and stopped) as NE came back to take the lead;  (3) GB did take
	advantage of good field position, and one bad mistake (the Freeman TD)
	can't be attributed to a great "game plan"; (4) given a 27-21 score
	with a decided personnel advantage (the author's phrase, not mine),
	and a rather poor 2nd half performance up to the Howard KO return,
	the Pats seemed to be well poised to keep this close to the end.
56.2825CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jan 28 1997 17:431
I think Green Bay adapted well when they started to lose momentum....
56.2826ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RTue Jan 28 1997 17:587
	Sure they did.  They made sure Desmond Howard got the ball,
	and blocked well for him.  After that, they relied on the hopes
	that NE would abandon a running game that was moderately effective
	on the drive that made it 27-21, and they were right.  However,
	had Howard run the ball back to, let's say the 30-35 yard line,
	don't you think the Pack would have had a much tougher time the
	rest of the way ?
56.2827This is tough, very tough, micro-criticismEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 18:0517
 
>       However,
>	had Howard run the ball back to, let's say the 30-35 yard line,
>	don't you think the Pack would have had a much tougher time the
>	rest of the way ?
    
    Yeah, sure, but so what?  I don't see how you can criticize a game
    plan largely on what "might" have happened had the special teams not
    come up so big.  Plus, to me, the pivotal part of the game was where
    Green Bay consumed almost half the second quarter in taking a 20-14 
    lead to 27-14.  New England only had one breath left after that.
    
    Sure, you can look at points in the game where Green Bay sputtered,
    but they scored 35 points, end of story.
    
    glenn
    
56.2828PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingTue Jan 28 1997 18:3317
 Besides Green Bay probably would have blasted them had Holgrem not gone
 braindead on that 4th and 2 foot call. I mean they had just run 12 or so
 plays where they got positive yardage. 

 and if you switched the QBs the Patriots would have won and the Packers
 lost. The game was a struggle that hinged on big plays. Favre made the
 big play tosses and scrambled effectively. Drewenia made a lot of big tosses
 more in favor of the Packers than his own team. 

 I can see fault Parcells abit but when it became painfully obvious that his
 best case was a shootout he went for it. It isn't his fault that the 7 million
 dollar man is two dollar and fifty cent punk..........

 mc 

 
56.2829MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 28 1997 19:0413
    Mike Madden of all people had a pretty good column today and apparently
    has pretty good access to football people since he's never shown much
    of a clue about anything in the past whether it be triple crown racing,
    golf or Boston professional sports.  He has Vinatieri definitely
    claiming foul and as having a chance and definitely making Howard
    change direction if he hadn't been held.
    
    Other Patriots, Whigham for example, made statements to the effect that
    "I guess holding is allowed [on runbacks] in the Superbowl".
    
    But I only want to point out the incident and not have this be a "refs
    cost us the game" micty.  When push came to shove, GreenBay did the
    pushing and shoving.
56.2830OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportTue Jan 28 1997 19:173
    
    That's how it's played in the NFC. Maybe the Almost Football Conference
    teams should try learning to play the game. (8^}>
56.2831CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Jan 28 1997 19:2420
  On the news this morning they were saying that the Patriots (i.e. Kraft) have
asked the commissioner to rule on whether Bill Parcells can coach elsewhere
next year and if he does if the Pats get any compensation. Here's the story
from the WCVB Channel 5 entry in boston.com

      "N-F-L Commissioner Paul Tagliabue will hold a conference call today to
    discuss the contract dispute between the New England Patriots and coach
    Bill Parcells. The commissioner could rule as soon as tomorrow but until
    then, no other N-F-L team is allowed to contact Parcells. Tagliabue is
    getting involved at the request of Patriots owner Bob Kraft. Kraft and
    Parcells disagree over whether the coach's contract allows him to move 
    to another team for next season -- Kraft says no, Parcells says yes. The
    New York Jets reportedly are interested in Parcells."

  WBZ cited one case where a coach left a year early to coach another team and
the team who the coach left got the other teams 1st round draft choice. They
didn't think that would if Parcells went to the Jets since it would be a #1
pick. 

  George
56.2832Partial Game Synopsis From A Packer FanYIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 28 1997 20:3777
      I read as far as .2752 and I'll give a Packer fan's perspective:
    
      I haven't been able to closely analyze the defensive alignments,
      but it looked to me by the Patriot's closeness to Packer receivers
      near the line of scrimmage, by their ability to stop the run, and
      by the lack of adequate deep defense, that the Pats schemed to
      stop the short end of the field - both run and pass.
    
      The Pack got those big plays because the Patriot's scheme basically
      forced them to.  That was all that was on the plate.  Further
      defense for this is the fact that Rison was open deep another time,
      i.e. I find it hard to believe that THREE times in the 1st half,
      the Pats could allow such oppurtunities unless the defensive scheme
      was emphasizing stopping the short (and thus being vulnerable by
      design).
    
      From a Packer perspective, what grated me the most was the 4th and
      1 call.  I thought it was a LOUSY call.  I felt it was getting to
      be lights out for the Pats at the beginning of the 2nd half.  The
      Pack was running well late in the 1st half where the last TD drive
      included quite a few good runs.  In the 1st second half drive, the
      Pack was moving right down the field real nice and methodically
      where they were even involving henderson quite a bit.  Then, on
      4th and 1, they run wide right instead of a nice safe QB sneak and
      all the effort was lost.  No field position and no score.  Follow
      this with the corner blitz the next time the Pack had the ball and
      Green Bay's usual 2nd half dominance was largely curtailed.
    
      I really thought they had light's out until the bonehead 4th down
      play.
    
      Beyond that, jacke missed a 47 yarder which is somewhat uncharacter-
      istic of him and Chmura missed an easy ten yard pass that was right
      in his hands.
    
      All in all, I feel the packers were pretty much better as a team 
      and a lot better in so far as composure is concerned.  The Pat's
      chance was the two possessions after they led 14-10.  That's right!
      They recaptured the ball TWICE with that lead.
    
      With the Pack only leading by six, it really looked scary from my
      perspective.  White and Dotson took themselves out on that last
      Patriot TD drive, "Oh no!  Are they tired?"  Martin had a decent
      TD run.  They showed the fog and the blocked AC and I'm thinking,
      "Wow!  If the Pats stop the Pack, they just might be able to run
      on us!"
    
      In thinking composure, every aspect of the team rose to the occasion.
      (Recall the SF game where SF lucked into that 21-14 deficit.  GB
      went on a game-crunching 72 yard drive with huge running plays.)
    
      This time the special teams produced the stunning play of the game.
      The offense converted the 2 pt. conversion.  Reggie White sacked
      Bledsoe on two of three plays.  Right when they needed composure,
      they got it.
    
      If the Pats are lucky and by that I mean surviving what may be a
      wholesale coaching change (assistants may all follow Parcells) and
      in the NFL I think coaching changes are more of an impact than in
      any other sport and if they can survive any player defections as
      a result, they should contend for the SB for years to come.  
    
      They gave the Pack a good game.  Bledsoe had some good moments.
      They were just a little talent and a fair amount of composure
      short.
    
      Outside Desmond Howard, the SB MVP just may have been Ted
      Johnson.  He was awesome.
    
      I think the Pack may contend for awhile as well.
    
      Lastly, I think the dancing stuff sucked and I am sorry to see
      it.  Howard, Rison, and Freeman.  What a bummer to see from my
      beloved Pack!
    
    						Tony
                   
56.2833Misc.YIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 28 1997 21:1642
      After reading the replies...
    
      On coaching, I tend to think that the Pats so emphasized the
      short end of the field that all that was left a lot of the time
      was the bombs.  In the 1st half alone, the Pack had three wide
      open ones.  So credit Holmgren for that (I think).
    
      It was all coming together coaching-wise late in the 1st half/
      early in the 2nd until that bonehead 4th down call.  Check it out.
      You'll see a real nice blend of running and passing.  Good ball
      movement.  If you really think about it, that 4th down play was
      HUGE (at the time) and it was a bad call.  Too risky and too little
      returns even if it did make a 1st down.  Just QB sneak it for crying
      out loud!
    
      On favre...Mike, he has essentially the same NFL exp. as Bledsoe.
      He never played in Atlanta.  Favre's progression has been faster.
      Also, I think he's very good.  The Pack had very little running
      the two years before this year and even though it was all on his
      shoulders, he really elevated his game.  And remember...they lost
      Sharpe and Brooks only began really lighting it up last year.
    
      I thought Parcell's game plan looked good at least in the 1st
      quarter.  The Pats could not run the ball - period.  The way I 
      saw it, Parcells wanted time consuming drives with nice rollouts
      in the hope of time of possession, scoring (of course), and tiring
      out a good but slightly aged defensive line.  If it continued to
      work in the 2nd and 3rd quarters, we might have seen a Packer
      defense about ready to roll over and die and you would have seen
      more and more rushing attempts.
    
      Daryll, Howard may not have any receiving numbers and his dancing
      may be sickening, but the return accomplishments are so stellar 
      that there is no way to do any other than totally commend his per-
      formance.  I mean, he basically beat SF and then he breaks the
      back of the Pats.  He was pretty good against Carolina too.  What
      more could anyone expect in a playoffs.  I mean, his output was
      absolutely staggering.
    
    							Tony
    
      
56.2834PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 29 1997 12:022
faster by light years imo on the QB comparision....
56.2835MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 29 1997 12:0914
    
      Howard's dancing and such didn't bother me at all.
     It looked like genuine enthusiasm although when he did
     it front of the Pats bench someone's territorial instincts
     should have kicked in and they should have throttled
     Howard. But if you want to shut him up, stop him. We didn't. 
     He's SB MVP. So, he earned the right to dance, sing and 
     whatever the hell else he wants to do. If Parcells
     wasn't special teams coach I wonder if he would have
     been as stubborn or if he would have squib kicked so 
     as to avoid the big play.
    
     BTW - Groiner, two words - Art Modell. 
           Two more words - American Hero.
56.2836Pats didn't step up to the task, their fault...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 29 1997 12:1827
                                          
>     Howard's dancing and such didn't bother me at all.
>     It looked like genuine enthusiasm although when he did
>     it front of the Pats bench someone's territorial instincts
>     should have kicked in and they should have throttled
>     Howard.
    
    Exactly.  It would have been worth the 15 yards, and even the ejection
    of some special teams-type.  It also might have made an impression to
    last the rest of the game.  You just shouldn't be able to walk right 
    over to the opponents' bench, taunt like that and get away with it.
    Someone should have stepped up to the duty.  Remember Jack Lambert on
    Cliff Harris?  That kind of thing can spark a team.  Leave it
    unchecked, and it works the other way.
    
> But if you want to shut him up, stop him. We didn't. 
    
    Also the fact.  But I think Parcells made the right decision in kicking
    to Howard.  The squib is a surrender that only guarantees the Packers 
    good field position for the rest of the game.  I don't think you can
    play scared like that and win, generally.  And the kickoff that Howard
    did return for TD was a beauty by Vinatieri, a lot of hangtime, the 
    kind of kick where if coverage is doing its job, can pin the Pack
    inside the 15.
    
    glenn
      
56.2837PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 29 1997 12:266
If the kick hung up there, then why the hell did the wedge and Howard get a
10 yard headstart? I haven't seen a replay since the game but I thought it got
there a tad quick. 

mc
56.2838PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Wed Jan 29 1997 13:462
    I think the touchback makes much more sense than a squib kick. 
    Completely takes Howard out of the game.
56.2839EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 29 1997 13:479
    
>    I think the touchback makes much more sense than a squib kick. 
>    Completely takes Howard out of the game.
    
    That's a matter of execution.  The 70+ yard kickoff is far from 
    automatic...
    
    glenn
    
56.2840college kids do thatPHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Wed Jan 29 1997 13:492
    then get a new kicker.  The Pats kicker can't even get it in the end
    zone.
56.2841Parcells maybe the GM only??BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOWed Jan 29 1997 13:5911
    QUESTION:  Heard something about Parcells to the Jets.....BUT
    
    Not as Coach but GM....Now how would this affect the contract, what
    Kraft says as he can't coach, compansation etc......????
    
    Could this have been the secret all along?  VP/GM Parcells??? 
    Sign Beleichek as Head Coach but he controls everything???
    
    something to think about...../Westy
    
    
56.2842coach or GM HBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Wed Jan 29 1997 14:006
According to Kraft, the words are "coach or equivalent position",
seemily intending to keep Parcells from any GM jobs as well.

But, it's all up to Tabliabue at thised point.

TTom
56.2843RE: .2840IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Wed Jan 29 1997 14:213
    
    Aren't college kids kicking from 5 to 10 yards closer?  The pros
    kick from the 30.
56.2844SNAX::ERICKSONWed Jan 29 1997 15:0912
    
    	Yes, College kids kick from closer don't know if its 5 or 10.
    The problem with Adam Vinateri is that he is just plain tired. He
    played his senior year in college, World Football League, and full
    NFL season without any breaks. I also think that the coaches don't
    want the kickers kicking the ball into the endzone, but want it
    returned. So much more good things can happen during a return then
    bad things for the kickoff team. With the big one being a fumble/
    turnover and a penalty. Which starts the other team inside the
    20. Which factors into the overall field position.
    
    Ron
56.2845PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Wed Jan 29 1997 16:029
    Well, there are still NFL kickers booting it into the end zone.
    
    Anyway, look at the Super Bowl.  The Pats started most of their drives
    on the 20 even with Meggett returing (does he look slow or is it me?). 
    Green Bay had much better starting field position on average.  It is a
    game of field position and the Pats miserably lost that battle.  When
    the title is at stake, you do whatever you can to equalize an
    opponent's advantage.  As the saying goes, you shouldn't make the 
    same mistake twice.  Parcells & Co. made it several times.
56.2846Some Favre questions to try to fairly contrast vs BledsoeTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Wed Jan 29 1997 16:567
    Thanks for the kind words, Tommy.
    
    I'm curious - does anyone know how old Favre is?  How long has he been
    in the league?  Was he with one or two other teams before going to the
    Packers?
    
    NAZZ
56.2847Favre's historyHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Wed Jan 29 1997 17:0262
from nfl.com:
   
Brett Favre, Packers

   Height: 6-2
   Weight: 222
   Born: October 10, 1969
   College: Southern Mississippi
   Experience: Sixth year in the NFL
   
   If NFL fans thought Brett Favre was something else in 1994 when he
   passed for 3,882 yards and 33 touchdowns and set a Packers' record for
   passer rating with 82.2, he showed them he was just getting started in
   1995. In leading Green Bay to the NFC Championship Game, Favre was the
   NFL's most valuable player. He led the NFC in passer rating at 99.5,
   and his 38 touchdown passes were the third-most ever.
   
   Favre has been a starter in Green Bay since 1992, when he was acquired
   from Atlanta in a trade. He has led the Packers to three consecutive
   playoff appearances, the first time the team had done that since the
   1960s. He has passed for more than 3,000 yards in each of the past
   four seasons, earning three Pro Bowl selections.
   
   After the 1995 season, Favre made news of a different kind. He
   voluntarily entered, and successfully completed, a rehabilitation
   program to combat an addiction to pain relievers.
   
   Before being selected by Atlanta in the second round of the 1991 NFL
   draft, Favre had a fine college career at Southern Mississippi. He set
   numerous school passing records, leading his team to a pair of bowl
   victories. Before his senior season, he was in a terrible auto
   accident, but recovered in time to lead Southern Miss to an early
   season upset of highly ranked Alabama. Favre came from seventh on the
   depth chart as a freshman to become the starter three game into his
   sophomore season. Raised in Kiln (pronounced "kill"), Mississippi,
   Favre was a football and baseball star. Playing football for his
   father, the coach, at Hancock North Central High School in Kiln, Favre
   was a quarterback, strong safety, punter, and placekicker.
   
   Close up
   In his first playoff game with Green Bay, Favre completed one of the
   most amazing passes in Packers history. With under a minute remaining,
   he threw an off-balance, across-the-field pass that Sterling Sharpe
   caught for a dramatic, game-winning touchdown.
   
   Stats
   [INLINE]
   
   Passing Att Com Pct Yds Ypa Td Td% Int Int% Sac Lost Rate
   1991 Atl. 5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 40.0 1 11 0.0
   1992 G.B. 471 302 64.1 3227 6.9 18 3.8 13 2.8 34 208 85.3
   1993 G.B. 522 318 60.9 3303 6.3 19 3.6 24 4.6 30 199 72.2
   1994 G.B. 582 363 62.4 3882 6.7 33 5.7 14 2.4 31 188 90.7
   1995 G.B. 570 359 63.0 4413 7.7 38 6.7 13 2.3 33 217 99.5
   Totals 2150 1342 62.4 15971 6.9 108 4.7 66 2.9 129 902 88.6
   
   Rushing Att Yds Avg Lg Td
   1992 G.B. 47 198 4.2 19 1
   1993 G.B. 58 216 3.7 27 1
   1994 G.B. 42 202 4.8 36 t 2
   1995 G.B. 39 181 4.6 40 3
   Totals 186 797 4.3 40 7
56.2848and BledsoeHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Wed Jan 29 1997 17:0664
from nfl.com:

Drew Bledsoe, Patriots

   Height: 6-5
   Weight: 233
   Born: February 14, 1972
   College: Washington State
   Experience: Fourth year in the NFL
   
   Few young quarterbacks have had the impact on a team or on the league
   as did Drew Bledsoe in his first two NFL seasons. In 1994, he set
   all-time NFL marks for pass attempts in a season (691), attempts in a
   game (70), and completions in a game (45), while leading the league's
   top passing offense. In 1995, he again passed for more than 3,000
   yards and led the AFC in pass attempts with 636. In addition, he
   already holds almost all the important Patriots single-season and
   single-game passing records. The youngest passer in NFL history to top
   7,000 career yards, Bledsoe is one of the NFL's top young quarterback.
   
   He began his road to the top as an all-state player at Walla Walla
   (Washington) High School. Then, in only three seasons at Washington
   State, he finished second in school history in passing yardage,
   touchdowns, and completions. Chosen by New England as the number-one
   overall pick of the 1993 NFL draft, he proved to be the right choice,
   helping the Patriots' passing offense jump from 26th to 12th in the
   NFL.
   
   Before the 1994 season, Bledsoe was regarded as a future superstar,
   but he proved that the future is now. In the 1994 season's 10th game,
   against Minnesota, with Bledsoe already on a record pace, he exploded.
   In a come-from-behind overtime thriller, Bledsoe set single-game
   records for attempts and completions and led New England to a 26-20
   victory. After halftime of that game, he completed 37 of 53 attempts
   for 3 touchdowns and no interceptions. The game ignited a seven-game
   win streak that catapulted the Patriots into the playoffs for the
   first time since 1986. His season total of 4,555 yards was the
   eighth-best in NFL history, to go along with the single-season
   attempts record he set. Finally, he missed the completion record by
   only 4. Bledsoe's amazing season earned him a trip to the Pro Bowl,
   becoming the second-youngest quarterback ever selected.
   
   Along with his amazing personal statistics in 1994, Bledsoe helped
   five teammates became the first quintet in NFL history to each make 50
   or more catches in the same season. Ben Coates, Michael Timpson, Leroy
   Thompson, Vincent Brisby, and Kevin Turner all topped 50.
   
   Close up
   Along with being active in several New England charities, Bledsoe
   endowed a scholarship at Washington State in honor of his grandfather.
   
   Stats
   
   Passing Att Com Pct Yds Ypa Td Td% Int Int% Sac Lost Rate
   1993 N.E. 429 214 49.9 2494 5.8 15 3.5 15 3.5 16 99 65.0
   1994 N.E. 691 400 57.9 4555 6.6 25 3.6 27 3.9 22 139 73.6
   1995 N.E. 636 323 50.8 3507 5.5 13 2.0 16 2.5 23 170 63.7
   Totals 1756 937 53.4 10556 6.0 53 3.0 58 3.3 61 408 67.9
   
   Rushing Att Yds Avg Lg Td
   1993 N.E. 32 82 2.6 15 0
   1994 N.E. 44 40 0.9 7 0
   1995 N.E. 20 28 1.4 15 0
   Totals 96 150 1.6 15 0
56.2849Facts are always appreciatedTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Wed Jan 29 1997 18:425
    Thanks for the info - I wasn't sure if there was an interim team
    between Atlanta and Green Bay.  I also thought it was his 7th or 8th
    year in the league.
    
    NAZZ
56.2850especially when they embaress Bledsoe even more!!PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 29 1997 18:470
56.28514500 yards not = embarassment(stats < 1996)MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 29 1997 18:571
    
56.2852Favre >>>>>> BledsoeYIELD::BARBIERIWed Jan 29 1997 20:381
    
56.2853NQOS01::nqsrv235.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchInside IntelThu Jan 30 1997 01:035
Meggett has never been that great a KO returner, IMO.  Punt returns are a 
nother story.

brews
56.2854PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingThu Jan 30 1997 11:384
 with all the attemps he had he should have 4000 grand by default. Look at
 the differences in ratings for the years a better judge of a qb's overall
 effectiveness. 
56.2855MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Jan 30 1997 12:427
    Ratings put a high premium on td passes and negative on interceptions.
    With Martin increasingly able to sneak into the end zone the Patriots
    were able to score in the red without the pass but they got there via
    the air.  Add Martin's tds and divide by 2 and get a fairer rating.
    
    But of course Favre is a much better qb, no one anywhere is discounting
    that.  Not especially after Sunday.
56.2856carry onHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownThu Jan 30 1997 12:445
>                       -< Facts are always appreciated >-

We don't need no steenkin facks!~

TTom
56.2857makes a big difference tooPHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Thu Jan 30 1997 14:312
    A case could be made that Favre has had a better group of receivers for
    a longer time.
56.2858SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Thu Jan 30 1997 15:13113
    I think that Parcells had his mind made up long ago, and that Kraft
    suggested that this was the case.  To that end, I applaud them both for
    keeping this in the background [as best they could] for the entire
    season.  While they both claimed that they would get together at the
    end of the season to discuss next year, that was just their
    professionalism in staying focused on the task at hand.  It must have
    been somewhat bitter-sweet for Parcells as the team progress during the
    season and through the playoffs.
    
    I see this as analagous to a married couple, who realize they will soon
    divorce, but maintain the party line for the kids until a big event has
    occured.  Could have been a graduation, a wedding, or a
    life-threatening operation.  But the couple stayed together for the
    benefit of their kids, at least until the big event was complete.
    
    I'm not happy that Bill is leaving, because I think he's done the best
    job any Patriot coach has ever done.  I understand his position, and I
    understand Kraft's position.  Both have done great things for this
    organization.  But a parting of the ways is now inevitable.  I only
    hope that they can continue in their professional manner and not engage
    in name-calling or mud-slinging.  [Mud slung is ground lost.]
    
    Following is the announcement as posted in Sportsline:
    
    SportsLine USA - NewsWire
    
    Parcells Bound To Patriots For 1997 
    
    
    Coach Bill Parcells is contractually bound to the New England
    Patriots for the 1997 season, the NFL ruled tonight. 
    
    NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue ruled in favor of the AFC
    champion Patriots and owner Bob Kraft in their dispute with
    Parcells, who cannot coach another NFL team in 1997 without
    Kraft's consent. 
    
    The ruling does not mean Parcells must coach the Patriots. After
    the 1995 season, he shortened his five-year contract by one
    year, but the contract still contained a provision which gave
    the team the right to employ Parcells if he chose to coach in
    1997. 
    
    Parcells has long been rumored to leave the Patriots to become
    coach and general manager of the New York Jets.  He reportedly
    has feuded with Kraft over control of personnel decisions with
    the Patriots. 
    
    According to the ruling, Parcells could pursue other business
    opportunities, such as broadcasting or non-coaching positions.
    There was no indication as to whether Parcells could take a
    team's general manager's job, then assume the coaching duties
    one year later. 
    
    Friedman & Atherton, the Boston law firm that represents
    Parcells, issued a one-paragraph statement tonight,
    acknowledging receipt of Tagliabue's ruling. 
    
    "Bill Parcells is considering the various options available to
    him.  He will make a statement as soon as possible," it stated. 
    
    In his ruling, Tagliabue cited an amendment made at Parcells'
    request on January 12th, 1996, which removed the fifth year --
    the 1997 season -- from the contract, but gave the Patriots the
    right to employ Parcells if he decided to coach in 1997. 
    
    Tagliabue based his ruling on a portion of the amendment which
    read, in "the event that (Parcells) desires to continue as an
    NFL head coach or other comparable position after January 31,
    1997, and the (Patriots) desire to continue to employ (Parcells)
    as its head football coach for an additional year through
    January 31, 1998, then the parties agree to extend the
    employment agreement" through the 1997 season. 
    
    Tagliabue held a one-hour conference call Tuesday with attorneys
    for Kraft and Parcells.  As commissioner, Tagliabue has
    exclusive authority to resolve such disputes under the NFL's
    constitution and by-laws. 
    
    Newsday (New York) reported today that the agent for Parcells,
    Robert Fraley, said his client will not return to New England
    for the 1997 season regardless of the commissioner's ruling. 
    
    Prior to the Super Bowl, there were reports that the Patriots
    had lined up San Francisco 49ers defensive coordinator Pete
    Carroll as a replacement for Parcells. 
    
    The request for a hearing by both parties finalized the divorce
    between the Patriots and Parcells, who guided the team to its
    first Super Bowl appearance in more than a decade.  New England
    lost to the Green Bay Packers, 35-21, Sunday in Super Bowl XXXI.
    
    The legal squabbling is far from over.  Parcells may still try
    to bolt to the Jets, with Kraft offering consent in exchange for
    the first overall pick in the April draft, which belongs to the
    Jets. 
    
    The Jets likely will offer Parcells complete control of football
    operations, a situation he once had in New England until Kraft
    turned over draft duties to director of player personnel Bobby
    Grier.  A disagreement over last year's draft selections began
    the rift between Parcells and Kraft. 
    
    Parcells is just the second coach in NFL history to take two
    organizations to the Super Bowl.  He coached the New York Giants
    to victories in Super Bowls XXI and XXV. 
    
    Parcells is 119-86-1 in 12 seasons as an NFL coach, including a
    10-5 mark in the playoffs. 
    
    
    
    Wed Jan 29 20:57:20 EST 1997
56.2859And a draft choice is a draft choiceMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Jan 30 1997 18:3010
    Parcell's has pretty much told his side of the story thru his
    mouthpiece McDonough.  Strangely I do believe that he at least clearly
    believed that to coach the Patriots next year was up to him and the
    fine print requiring compensation a total blindside.
    
    This should be a lesson to the folks in South and Boston proper and the
    state in general to get it all in writing and read every line because
    he'll be pulling a similar fast one on the stadium deal.
    
    Then again feeling sorry for Parcells comes awfully hard.
56.2860According to ESPNCSLALL::BRULESmack the PackThu Jan 30 1997 18:598
    Kraft didn't become rich by just giving things away. I have to laugh at
    McDonough's story now. He came off as saying Kraft would lose and would
    look ridiculous in the end. Well Bill (and Wil's) agent either lied or
    didn't know the whole ramifications of the contract because it was a
    slam dunk. The Jets have supposedly offered 2 #2 draft picks and the
    Pats told them they want the #1 pick.
    
    Mike
56.2861MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 30 1997 19:0212
      If you suffered through the Sullivan and Kiam regimes
     you have to love how Kraft tucked it to Parcells. Billy
     Sullivan would have lost Parcells and probably would be
     *giving* who ever gets him a draft pick. Kiam would have
     lost Parcells but takem cash in return. Kraft got the
     dough and will probably get a good draft pick as well.
     I'm sure Kraft is getting ready to take Pats fans for a
     ride because that's the greedy nature of the owner beast
     but if you're going to get it done to you it might as well
     be by one of the best. In the beginning I thought Kraft was
     nuts to try and build his stadium in Southie but it looks
     like if Beggin' Bob is crazy, he's crazy like a fox.
56.2862MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Jan 30 1997 19:1516
    Who says Parcells has lost anything yet.  Jets will not give up Orlando
    Pace and will have Parcells as coach next season.  
    
    1. Parcells thinks he has a clear agreement with Kraft.  Shame on
    Parcells.  Not the first and not the brightest to hear tell of it.
    
    2. Parcells and Kraft agree that before they can begin to fight they
    have to find out from Tagliabue (who's boss among 30 is Kraft) what
    they will fight about.
    
    3. Now come negotiations.  See second sentence.  Kraft can probably
    quickly get #33 or so in this years draft and a 15-25 down the line.
    If he waits then he has no coach until Tagliabue steps in again.  Or
    the courts get involved and when have the nfl ever won?
    
    But as I said before Auerbach did the same thing as Kraft.
56.2863CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jan 30 1997 19:201
If the Pats did get the #1 pick, they could pick Peyton Manning....
56.2864MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 30 1997 19:2313
    
    >> Kraft can probably quickly get #33 or so in this years draft 
    >> and a 15-25 down the line. If he waits then he has no coach 
    >> until Tagliabue steps in again.  Or the courts get involved 
    >> and when have the nfl ever won?
    
       ESPN is reporting that the Jets have offered the Pats two second
       round picks and a million bucks for the Tuna. Kraft turned them
       down. I think you have it backwards, billte. Time is a bigger
       factor for the Jets than it is for the Patsies. We have our per-
       sonnel people in place to analyze the draft and free agent market. 
       The Jets want to give that job to the Tuna and the sooner they can
       get him it the better.
56.2865IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Thu Jan 30 1997 19:4315
    
    Two #2 picks and a million.  I honestly doubt the cash is a big
    consideration in this whole thing.
    
    Why not offer to *trade* #1 picks in return for letting them have
    Parcells, rather than insisting on just getting their #1?  It's
    a decent compromise position from Kraft's perspective.
    
    What frightens me is what the Pats want to allegedly do if they get
    the #1 overall, which is to pick Orlando Pace.  I think that'd be
    a mistake.  Get it, then trade *down* for a lineman and a lower pick.
    Use the pick for a corner, or another lineman.
    
    Peyton Manning, huh?  From the school that gave the world Heath Shuler?
    
56.2866SNAX::ERICKSONThu Jan 30 1997 19:5211
    
    	Its only been day 1, if I was Kraft I would hold out a little
    longer for this years #1 pick. If you can't get it then tell the Jets
    this years #2, plus next years #1 for Parcells. Take a crapshoot on
    next years #1, who knows where it could be.
    	Then for this years draft if there is a player still on the board
    you really want at around the 20th pick. You can trade the 29th and
    31st pick to move up. Then next year you have 2 #1's to potentially
    move up in the draft.
    
    Ron
56.2867MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Jan 30 1997 20:018
    After the Max Lane massacre last Sunday night I'd think Pace would be a
    top priority.  We moved down once and got Singleton and Agnew.
    
    Obviously this is just fishing around and a deal will be cut soon.  But
    Parcells has leverage.  Earhardt is at the Jets and could take over for
    a year.  Parcells goes to a network and does a detailed draft report
    over the air.  Just talking about it would move Tagliabue to tell Kraft
    to take a lesser deal than #1 overall.
56.2868PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Thu Jan 30 1997 21:365
    I agree with Pace.  We don't need Manning, Mr. Heisman, or Jake
    Plummer.  We don't need Troy Davis.  We need a widebody to protect
    Bledsoe and make large holes for Curtis Martin.  Football begins and
    ends with the lineman.  Even Bledsoe does well if his protection lasts
    long enough.
56.2869SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Fri Jan 31 1997 01:2612
    Some of the possibilities for coaches include:
    
    Pete Carroll
    Joe Gibbs
    George Seifert
    Don Shula
    Bill Belichick
    
    Not that all are actually available.  My preference far and away would
    be Gibbs, followed by Seifert, Shula, Carroll, and Belichick.
    
    	Ted
56.2870Lineman, yes. Pace with #1? No.IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Fri Jan 31 1997 12:0417
    RE: the last few
    
    My problem isn't with picking a lineman - it's with picking Pace in
    particular.  The guy is dominant, then disappears at stretches.  And
    this is at the college level.
    
    There's no doubt the Pats need offensive line help.
    
    What Ron said makes a lot of sense.  You could probably still get a
    very nice corner to eventually complement Ty Law somewhere around
    #20.
    
    BTW - I think Law was one of the *good* Parcells draft picks.  Many
    folks (including myself) said "who"?  But take a look at what the guy
    has turned into.  He came up *HUGE* in the Dallas game, and how many
    times did the Pack throw at him?
    
56.2871SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jan 31 1997 13:076
    
    	You have to remember that Bruce Armstrong realistically only has
    ~3 years left of football. He has been in the league for about ~11
    years now. Which could swing them into picking Pace.
    
    Ron
56.2872WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Fri Jan 31 1997 13:4312
    
    > Note 56.2865 by IMBETR::DUPREZ 
    >
    > Why not offer to *trade* #1 picks in return for letting them have
    > Parcells, rather than insisting on just getting their #1?  It's
    > a decent compromise position from Kraft's perspective.
    
    I've been wondering this very same thing.  I've kind of wondered that
    if they let Tagliabue arbitrate (which they probably won't), that 
    that's what he'd rule.
    
    - Sean
56.2873CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 31 1997 13:476
  Question is, would that be a good deal for the Jets.

  Their 1st round pick is #1 overall. The Pats should be down the line near
last when most of the franchise type prospects would be gone. 

  George
56.2874PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingFri Jan 31 1997 13:528
 Unbelievable all the local radio stations can do is roast and toast Parcells
 instead of addressing the Patrios real problem what do about Bledsoe? His
 salary, his heart and his mind make him untradable so they're stuck with
 either keep the looser for 5 more years or eating his salary and getting
 a real man out there to lead the team...........

 mc
56.2875MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Fri Jan 31 1997 13:5713
    >> The Pats should be down the line near last when most of the 
    >> franchise type prospects would be gone. 
    
       The draft is a crapshoot and franchise picks aren't always in the
       top 10. Emmitt Smith and Dan Marino were both picked in the middle
       of the first round and guys like Tony Mandarich, who was picked
       2nd the year he came out, sometimes end up riding pine for their
       brief careers. I'm with Roland Duprez. Orlando Pace is at times 
       awsome and at others invisible. That may be because Cooper didn't 
       know how to take advanatge of him. I don't know. I do know that if 
       you could pry the #1 away from the Jets, it'd be pretty damned 
       valuable to someone else and as such you could parlay it into a 
      slew of decent picks and mybe even players and picks.
56.2876CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 31 1997 14:0217
RE            <<< Note 56.2875 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>... I do know that if 
>       you could pry the #1 away from the Jets, it'd be pretty damned 
>       valuable to someone else and as such you could parlay it into a 
>      slew of decent picks and mybe even players and picks.

  Another reason the Jets might want to keep the #1 pick.

  I wonder if part of what's going on is that Parcells feels he blew the #1
pick he used for Bledsoe and wants another chance at picking a Quarterback that
he can mold and use as the centerpiece of a new team.

  I doubt that would be all of it but I wonder if it's a factor. If not a
factor in leaving the Pats, maybe a factor in going to the Jets.

  George
56.2877IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Fri Jan 31 1997 14:0915
    
    George - no kidding that the Jets want to keep the #1 pick.  We all
    know that it's worth a lot.  The basic point is that Kraft is going
    to try to make it hurt the Jets as much as possible for two reasons:
    
    1) they're in the same division, and more importantly...
    
    2) this has now gotten *really* personal.  Supposedly, Kraft is really
       miffed that L'Affaire Parcells clouded the enjoyment of the Super
       Bowl for himself and everyone else involved with the franchise.  Up
       to that point, it was philosophical and business differences only.
    
    It's classic negotiating - ask for as much as you can get, then fall
    back on what you really expect.
    
56.2878ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backFri Jan 31 1997 14:096
    
    smart move by kraft... tuna wants out, he's gonna leave after next
    season anyways, force him to stay
    
    does tuna have trade power?  if so, bledsoe will get traded to the jets
    this year
56.2879SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jan 31 1997 14:4612
    
    	Some of you guys are amazing the Pats loose the Super Bowl, so its
    Bledsoe's fault, he stinks, get rid of the bum. Using that reasoning
    Dan Marino, John Elway, and Jim Kelly are all losers. They stink they
    should have been cut/released by there current teams years ago. If
    Miami got rid of Dan Marino 12 years ago after he lost a Super Bowl.
    Miami would have won a Super Bowl since then. If Buffalo dumped Jim
    Kelly after his 1st Super Bowl loss, they would have won the next 3
    without him. The Donks would have finally won a Super Bowl if they
    got rid of John Elway a long time ago.
    
    Ron
56.2880IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Fri Jan 31 1997 15:347
    
    I don't think anyone can argue that Bledsoe isn't effective when he
    gets time to throw.  I think putting a couple of additional stud
    offensive linemen in front of him will help make his contract look
    a little more reasonable.  The pieces are already there at the 
    skill positions.
    
56.2881PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingFri Jan 31 1997 16:0512
It's hard to say on Marino as his team never got back but in the Donks and
Bills' case for sure. Both are loosers. Would both teams have won with
differnt QBS? Maybe, maybe not but given both guys more than contributed
their share to their teams' misfortunates is clearly evident. Great QBS
wouldn't come up empty that many times. Both Elway and Kelly have heart
but both are happy feet babies who have thrown the ball up for graps
under pressure more times than not. Also their cranial matter is suspect.
Bledsoe's cranium is damaged and his heart is non-exsistant so how you going
to win the ultimate game with him?

mc
56.2882IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Fri Jan 31 1997 16:1212
    
    ESPNet SportsZone says that in an 11:30 am announcement, Parcells has
    said he won't coach in 1997.  He basically said that if he was going
    to coach, he had to coach the Patriots, and he wasn't going to coach
    the Patriots.
    
    Question is, is he telling the truth?
    
    Also, if the Jets pull the aforementioned deal using Erhardt as coach
    for one year, might the Pats be able to charge the Jets with tampering
    anyway (provided they could prove a scheme was in effect).
    
56.2883SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jan 31 1997 16:527
    
    re .2881,
    
    	MC, I don't buy your argument. If Marino was any good, he would
    have been to multiple Super Bowls.
    
    Ron
56.2884required commentaryHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownFri Jan 31 1997 16:561
Was Robert E. Lee any good at being a general?
56.2885MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Fri Jan 31 1997 16:584
    
      Ron, you're usually one of the more lucid noters in here
     but I'm having trouble following your logic on this Marino
     thang.
56.2886CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Jan 31 1997 17:2220
>                            -< required commentary >-
>
>Was Robert E. Lee any good at being a general?

I'll bite.

Robert E. Lee was one of the best generals either side fielded in that war.

Time and again early on, he confounded his opposite number, who usually, early
on, was less talented.

Later on, I believe two things plagued General Lee.  Granted, a reply in this
conference has to be nothing short of a sweeping generalization, but first, he
had a finite supply of men and the goods of war, whereas the industrialized
north didn't.  Second, I think that after Gettysburg, the war was not winnable
for the south, and that surely was a handicap.




56.2887as they say, ...HBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownFri Jan 31 1997 17:362
Yeah, but he never won the big one :=]

56.2888PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Fri Jan 31 1997 19:059
    RE: tampering
    
    This is all over the talk shows here and I'm surprised it took so long for
    someone to bring it up.  What are they saying in New England?
    
    It's a no-brainer that the Jets were tampering for Parcells to have a
    job and everything all lined up.
    
    Mike
56.2889Couldn't resistMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteSun Feb 02 1997 00:305
    >Later on, I believe two things plagued General Lee.  Granted, a reply
                                                         ^^^^^^
    
    And that would have been the third.
    
56.2890CSLALL::BRULESmack the PackMon Feb 03 1997 11:317
    Mike,
    The Pats cann't prove it but if the Jets want Parcells for nexted year
    it's going to cost them big. Pete Carroll looks like the next coach.
    The Jets fans are whining that they shouldn't have to pay anything to
    the Pats and that they are committing blackmail. 
    
    mike
56.2891PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Feb 03 1997 12:207
 You know back in my day, Kraft would have been a man about it and cut Parcells
 loose and kicked his butt on the field. Now it's all sleezeball politics, and
 mudsling in the papers hiding behind some law written for skirts. It's a shame
 what they done to the game.........

 mc
56.2892IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Feb 03 1997 12:294
    
    Back in your day they wore leather helmets.  I suppose they should
    still do things that way, too...
    
56.2893CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Feb 03 1997 12:416
  It's not just a matter of releasing Parcells so he can coach somewhere else.
It's a question of what Kraft wants in return. If he can get the #1 pick, why
just throw it away? If they won't give up the #1 pick then why not try for
the best you can get?

  George
56.2894SNAX::ERICKSONMon Feb 03 1997 12:449
    
    re .2891,
    
    	MC, I think that if Parcells was nice about the whole situation and
    didn't try and play hardball with Kraft. Bob Kraft would have let
    Parcells go without compensation. Since Parcells made it personal,
    Kraft is just showing Bill that he can play hardball too.
    
    Ron
56.2895CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Feb 03 1997 12:545
  Well, I don't know about that. Read the Sunday Boston Globe article about
Kraft. According to that article he always plays hard ball. That pretty much
agrees with what I've heard in other places as well.

  George
56.2896Po Po Leon HessCSLALL::BRULESmack the PackMon Feb 03 1997 12:587
    How many multi-millionaires don't play hardball? YOu don't become
    extremly rich giving things away. Parcells tucked it to Kraft and the
    Pats during the Super Bowl week by having his favorite clown Wil
    McDonough write his article about how he's going to leave and Kraft
    cann't stop him. Payback is a bitch.
    
    Mike
56.2897SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Mon Feb 03 1997 12:597
You don't get to where Kraft is without knowing how to play 
hardball. He's making the right move here and the Jets will pony 
up the #1 as well as a player I'd venture. Both of these guys are 
egotistical megalomaniacs. Neither picked each other. The fact 
that they can't get along shouldn't be a big surprise.

daryll
56.2898CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Feb 03 1997 13:2110
  From Kraft's point of view, asking for the #1 pick makes sense. If the Jets
are desperate he just might get it. If not, at least he starts the negotiation
at a point which sends the message Parcells won't come cheap. 

  However if I were the Jets I wouldn't give up much of anything. They aren't
going to accomplish much of anything next year anyway, just hire an intrim
coach with the understanding that he's just there for 1 year, use the #1 pick
or trade it as you see fit, then next year hire the Tuna. 

  George
56.2899PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Feb 03 1997 13:2012
 I never once said that what Kraft was doing was stupid, I just said it ain't
 man-ly! I love how everyone conviently ignores the fact that Kraft fired the
 first volley in this pissin' contest not Parcells. It so conviently forgotten.
 My B-I-L who's a season ticket holder told me three weeks ago that Parcells
 walked on water, yesterday he told me what bum he was. COuldn't draft to save
 his ass or evaluate talent etc. 

 I wonder what these same fans are going to say about Kraft when he drops the
 soap to them on his way to greener pastures??????

 mc
56.2900SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Mon Feb 03 1997 13:281
What volley was that Mike?
56.2901PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Feb 03 1997 13:391
that Parcells' was leaving and Drewenia couldn't be happier....
56.2902PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Mon Feb 03 1997 13:441
    Is Kraft going to do the smart thing and promote Bellichek?
56.2903CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Feb 03 1997 13:5129
RE   <<< Note 56.2899 by PECAD8::CHILDS "Steelers get a pants-down spanking" >>>

> I never once said that what Kraft was doing was stupid, I just said it ain't
> man-ly! I love how everyone conviently ignores the fact that Kraft fired the
> first volley in this pissin' contest not Parcells. It so conviently forgotten.

  You mean Kraft fired the 1st of the volley's that became public. Who knows
how many volleys they fired at each other behind closed doors or at each other
in the political realm of the Patriots front office before something got leaked
to the press by one side or the other? Most likely this is the result of a
battle that's been going on for months if not years.

  One thing Parcells said was correct, Kraft is the owner. It's his team to
do with as he sees fit. Most likely if Parcells had gone along with coaching
the 5th year doing things Kraft's way, none of this would have happened. 
Parcells as much as said he wasn't happy "If they want you to do the cooking
at least you should be able to shop for some of the groceries, all right?"
From that point of view, if Parcells was the one causing the problems. Being
the boss, when Kraft says jump, Parcells only job is to ask how high. It
appears Parcells was not willing to do that which lead to the problems.

  It also appears that he didn't understand his contract and agreed to talk
to the Jets with one year of commitment to the Pats and Kraft sill remaining.
Under those circumstances I really don't see where Kraft is obliged to roll
over. Why not try to get what ever the Jets will cough up?

  The only Kraft is not being man-ly is if man-ly == stupid.

  George
56.2904MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Feb 03 1997 13:4623
    
    >> However if I were the Jets I wouldn't give up much of anything. 
    >> They aren't going to accomplish much of anything next year anyway, 
    >> just hire an intrim coach with the understanding that he's just 
    >> there for 1 year, use the #1 pick or trade it as you see fit, then 
    >> next year hire the Tuna. 
    
       Part of what makes the Jets job so appealing to Tuna is that they
       have a core of very good young players. Maybe not quite as good as
       the Pats but actually pretty close. Marvin Jones, Hugh Douglas,
       Keyshawn Johnson and I remember reading that Tuna was a big
       Kyle Brady fan. Tuna has also said that Carolina and Jacksonville
       have shown that the time it takes to build a championship-calibre
       team has shortened from roughly four years to roughly two. That
       makes one year *huge*. Still, I think whether to sacrifice the #1 
       for Tuna may be a tougher decison for the Tuna than it is for the 
       Jets. Tuna wants that #1 as much as he wants to start building a
       champion because that #1 figures to be an intergral part. And I
       don't think he wants Peyton Manning with it. The Jets want Tuna 
       now and the list of guys who'd take a job for one year is short
       and insulting to Jets fans. There's more interest in the Jets just 
       on the basis of specualtion that Tuna might be coming than there has
       been in years. Sort of like the Pats used to be.
56.2905smart?HBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 13:523
>    Is Kraft going to do the smart thing and promote Bellichek?

I thought Pete Carroll is gonna get the job?
56.2906MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Feb 03 1997 13:485
    
     Pete Carroll might be signed as early as today. I don't
    want Bellicheck. I caught his act in Cleveland and was
    unimpressed. He's a good defensive coach but that's about 
    the extent of his talents.
56.2907PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Feb 03 1997 13:491
that'd be a stupid idea imo. 
56.2908another vote for dumbHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 14:009
Carroll is just another in a long line of Coordinators who have proven
they caint run the whole show. For ever Mike Holmgren who successfully
makes the leap, there's a bunch of Buddy Ryans.

And the Raiders seem to be making the same mistake with Bugel.

It's definitely the Peter Principle at work.

TTom
56.2909PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Mon Feb 03 1997 13:582
    Carroll is a stupid move imho.  Any coach who can go to the playoffs
    every year with Testaverde at QB deserves another chance.
56.2910not too good thereHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 14:028
Talk about danging with faint praise.

You really caint laud someone who'd have Vinnie in the firsted place.

In the seconded place, someone else took him under his wing and Vinnie
went to the Pro Bowl.

TTom
56.2911SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Mon Feb 03 1997 14:0519
Mike,

What qualifies as "man-ly" with you kills me. Kraft is sticking 
to his guns. He's in the position of power here and he's not the 
type to let that upperhand go unused. Kiam and Sullivan would 
bent over and let Parcells go with no compensation. Hell, 
Sullivan probably would've probably lost a player or pick as 
well. Got a soft spot for ineptness or something? 

Parcells wanted his contract renegotiated and Kraft said no problem. 
Problem is, Kraft is a better business man that Parcells. Bill walks out 
thinking he's free to go anywhere he pleases after this season 
and then, during the SB of all times, decided to feed that 
suck-up McDonough with his side of the story. But, turns out that 
Bob happens to know what he's doing and he's got Tuna by the 
shorthairs. Bob Kraft is looking out for his best interest. 
In my book, that'll qualify as "man-ly". 

daryll
56.2912I think the #1 request is a little clearer to me now...IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Feb 03 1997 14:1414
    	.   Still, I think whether to sacrifice the #1
        .   for Tuna may be a tougher decison for the Tuna than it is for the
        .   Jets. Tuna wants that #1 as much as he wants to start building a
        .   champion because that #1 figures to be an intergral part.
    
     And this, I believe, is the beauty of it for Kraft.  Taking the
    thing away from Parcells that would hit closest to home.  "Sure,
    you can have the great coach, but I want some of the best raw material
    he'd have to work with."
    
    If the Jets cough up the pick, they've paid dearly.  And if they don't,
    there's a good chance they lose a year in their rebuilding effort,
    and Mr. Dwayne Parcells goes a year without doing what he likes best.
    
56.2913:-)SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Mon Feb 03 1997 14:228
       <<< Note 56.2912 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "A great face for radio..." >>>

   > If the Jets cough up the pick, they've paid dearly.  
   
    Apparently, you having been paying attention to the Jet's 
    last few 1st rd picks.

    daryll
56.2914so what?HBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 14:309
>    Apparently, you having been paying attention to the Jet's 
>    last few 1st rd picks.

That's what I've been thinking, daryll.

So the Jets lose a firsted round draft pick. So what? At least their fans
will get something outta it fer a change.

TTom
56.2915MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Feb 03 1997 14:556
    
      I like hearing the Jets fans moan every year no matter who
     the Jets pick. The year they pciked Jeff Lageman in the first
     round set some sort of record for whining. Of course, Jeff
     is still in the league almost ten years later but no one ever
     accused Jets fans of being the most astute bunch.
56.2916considering what the Jets draft, ...HBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 14:584
When you pick Ken O'Brien over Dan Marino, I'd say it's the front office
of the Jets that won't be confused with astute.

TTom
56.2917MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Feb 03 1997 15:025
    
       There's a long list of guys who were taken before Marino that
      year. Ken O'Brien isn't the biggest stiff on it either. Not that
      I'm defending the Jets drafting ability but Marino slipped by a few
      folks. 
56.2918not lonesomeHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 15:114
All that tells me is that there are other stupid front offices in the
league. The Jets evidently don't have a monopoly.

TTom
56.2919PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Feb 03 1997 15:233
cut the BS there's youngin's in here. It wasn't stupidy it was the tootsie
problem that Danny had his senior year that dropped his stock. No self respectin
good ole boy wanted a cokehaid runin his team.........
56.2920'83 QB'sYIELD::BARBIERIMon Feb 03 1997 16:1914
      Is that right Mike?  I didn't know that?  Who was from that
      famed class anyway???
    
      Todd Blackledge
      Jim Kelly
      Tony Eason
      Jim O'Brien
      John Elway
      Dan marino
    
      Does that about do it?  I remember Marino was drafted after all
      of them.  Blackledge was the biggest bust.
    
    						Tony
56.2921MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Feb 03 1997 16:2826
    
    >> All that tells me is that there are other stupid front 
    >> offices in the league. 
    
       Or that the draft is almost as much instinct as science. 
       There was no way of knowing that Marino would go on to
       have the career he had. I'm sure not even Miami expected 
       it. Some guys have a knack for the draft and some guys
       play it by the book and some guys just continually screw
       it up. Jimmy Johnson's made his rep picking future all-pro's 
       in rounds 3-7. Guys that anyone could have taken but didn't. 
       He has that ability. Which brings us back to Tuna, who doesn't. 
       The thing that sent Tuna packing is that he wanted full control 
       of the draft when Kraft had an organization in place to perform 
       that function. Tuna wanted a d-linmen when the Patsies had 
       Glenn rated way above everyone else on the board. Word is that
       when that happened Tuna stormed out of the draft room and the
       Pats went on ot take Lawyer Milloy, Teddy Bruschi, etc. We
       had a great draft last year. If we'd listened to Tuna we probably
       wouldn't have. Kraft said that the reason he didn't give Parcells
       full control is that he didn't want the organizaion hanging on
       one man because he knew that Tuna was here for the shorthaul
       and Kraft was in it for the longhaul. If anyone comes out of
       this smelling like a rose, it's director of personnel Bobby
       Grier. Kraft stood by him and his team and he made Kraft look
       good.
56.2922MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Feb 03 1997 16:302
    
     It's Ken O'Brien but other than that the list is right.
56.2924New CoachFRSBEE::GROVESMon Feb 03 1997 16:463
    
    According to USA TODAY, Pete Carroll agreed to a 5-year contract. No
    other details were dicussed.
56.2923whatever it is, the Jets don't have itHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 16:5811
>       Or that the draft is almost as much instinct as science. 

Use whatever word you want but it comes down to the same reality.
The Jets lack whatever it takes in the draft while others seem to
consistently do well.

Besides O'Brien, the Jets also passed over Jerry Rice. I know that like
Marino so did a lot of other teams but them being similarly impeded
doesn't make the Jets any smarter, better, luckier or more instictual.

TTom
56.2925MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Mon Feb 03 1997 17:088
    
    >> The Jets lack whatever it takes in the draft while others 
    >> seem to consistently do well.
    
       I don't disagree but I don't think that not taking Rice
       or Marino is the proper evidence. If someone had told you 
       before the draft that either one would be the greatest ever 
       at his position would you have believed him?
56.2926or just plain badHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 17:1715
I din't see Marino that much in college but it din't take too many looks
at the highlights of Mississippi Valley St to see that Rice could play.

But here's the point: the Jets haven't got it done in *ALL* ways. They
have a history of drafting people who at best don't turn out. They sign
big name, big dollar FAs - e.g., O'Donnell - who don't earn their keep.

I will grant them this: they are about as unlucky a sprots team this side
of the LA Clippers. Unlike the Clippers who are showing some signs of
life thised year, the Jets have no such rosey outlook.

And, of course, the Jets do not have the market on any of this cornered.
There are plenty of middling to bad franchises throughout sprots. 

TTom
56.2927SNAX::ERICKSONMon Feb 03 1997 17:1810
    
    	I seem to remember that up until about 4 years ago, I thought
    the Patriots drafted bad. Didn't the Pats head of scouting or
    something like that, (Steinberg) leave the Pats and go to the Jets?
    	Funny quote from Pete Carroll at todays press conference. They
    asked him about having control and the grocery comment Parcells made.
    He responds with, When I go food shopping with my wife, all I do is
    push the carriage around.
    
    Ron 
56.2928CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Feb 03 1997 17:264
  Well the Jets must have done something right at some point. They did win
Superbowl III (or what ever it was called back then).

  George
56.2929easy to answerHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 17:284
Yeah, they had a guy who was smart enough to get Joe Namath and then
build a good team around him.

TTom
56.2930The there's the FalconsODIXIE::ZOGRANIt's around here somewhereMon Feb 03 1997 17:338
    The team logo next to the word "inept" in the dictionary is that of the
    Falcons.
    
    Now we have Reeves, who couldn't win the big one with Elway, in charge
    of the whole shootin' match, no QB, and a defense that couldn't stop a
    passing attack led by a decent HS QB.
    
    UMDan
56.2931good nomineeHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 17:3714
Hey, UMDan,

We gots ya a QB: Heath Shuler. He's a Falcon kinda guy, dontcha think.
And I think you'll be able to get 'im for less that 4 mil.

But your right about the Falcons. 

Another good example of how not to run a team had been the Minnesota
Timberwolves who shared none of the success of their fellow expansion
teams - Charlotte, Orlando, Miami. Then they finally realize you need
someone who actually knows something about the game, they hire McHale and
I'm on a_easy ride for the over 28 wins for the season.

TTom
56.2932"Sorry Charlie..."YIELD::BARBIERIMon Feb 03 1997 17:545
      Thanks Tommy and I couldn't agree more with .2922.  Excellent
      reply.  Almost as good as mine!   ;-)
    
      Too bad Tuna's ego is so good.  Maybe his first name ought to
      be Charlie...
56.2933Correction: "is so BIG" (man!)YIELD::BARBIERIMon Feb 03 1997 17:551
    
56.2934SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Mon Feb 03 1997 18:072
Roger Vick

56.2935SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Mon Feb 03 1997 18:071
Johnny Mitchell
56.2936SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Mon Feb 03 1997 18:121
Ryan Yarborough
56.2937ODIXIE::ZOGRANIt's around here somewhereMon Feb 03 1997 18:286
    Seeing as how my former "Home Team" was the 'Skins, I'm not sure that I
    want to see Shuler here.  He could be a good one, but he needs a good
    QB coach.  On the other hand, maybe he could use a baptism by fire, and
    at the Falcons, he'd get it fer sure!
    
    UMDan
56.2938ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backMon Feb 03 1997 20:033
    
    If Kraft wants a 500 team he'll do the "smart" thing and promote
    Bellichek <--- not a head coach.
56.2939MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Feb 03 1997 20:255
    >  Back in your day they wore leather helmets.  I suppose they should
    >   still do things that way, too...
    
    They should.  Plastic helmets ruined football. 
    
56.2940turned them into weaponsPECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingTue Feb 04 1997 11:523
 that sissy's could hid behind and stick guys in the back while they aren't 
 looking........
56.2941now we knowHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownTue Feb 04 1997 14:5411
Lo, the circle is complete.

The Jets have hired Bill Belichick as their main main.

Way back when, I thought Belichick was the heir apparent to Tuna. I guess
that plan moved.

And then it became evident that he weren't to be the new Pats head coach
so I was wondering about his fate. 

TTom
56.2942Wonder what this does for Kraft's ego?HYMIE::SALMONTue Feb 04 1997 15:361
    All of a sudden two 2nd rounders is looking pretty good!
56.2943PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingTue Feb 04 1997 15:463
 he's probably happy because the skirt knew Parcell's Jets would kick the 
 Pattys' butts.........
56.2944CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Feb 04 1997 15:534
  On the news they were saying the Jets had to name a coach so he's the guy
they named. They still want the Tuna.

  George
56.2945Hahahahaha... the man is a hardass...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Feb 04 1997 16:059
    
> On the news they were saying the Jets had to name a coach so he's the guy
> they named. They still want the Tuna.
    
    "If they want to give us Hugh Douglas, Keyshawn Johnson and Aaron
    Glenn, we'd think about it".
    
    				Bob Kraft, on compensation for Parcells
    
56.2946SUBPAC::SKALSKIA reclined state of mindTue Feb 04 1997 16:1413
    
    	Word from the Jests is " You'll get nothing and like it!"
    So Belicheck gets the nod, and Tuna becomes the main main nexted
    year.  No chance of Tuna doing a little covert assistance during
    97.  Caint blame Velveeta (kraft) for tryin to get something for
    nuthin.  
    
    
    							Shark
    
    
    
    
56.2947So says Kraft will get nothing?SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Tue Feb 04 1997 17:023
Now then, about those tampering charges.....


56.2948probably headed for courtPHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Feb 04 1997 17:125
    Tampering could've happened as early as when Parcells negotiated down
    his contract term.
    
    Kraft is going to look like the fool if he gets no compensation for
    Parcells or Belichick.
56.2949MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Tue Feb 04 1997 17:1413
The Jets are also talking about tampering with respect
to Kraft naming three players as possible compensation.

According to ESPNet and the Jets news conference, Parcells
is going to be a consultant this year and take over coaching
and all football operations next February, unless something
is worked out with the Pats before then.

Looks like the next move is up to the Pats.  I'm not sure
how Parcells "consulting" with Steve Gutman isn't a violation
of the contract amendment, however.

Mike
56.2950MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Tue Feb 04 1997 17:187
As for the Jets tampering, I think that they decided
to let their actions speak for them by not interviewing
anyone for the position.  The Jets really had nothing to
lose (other than a shot at Bobby Ross) by waiting.

If anyone made contact early, I'd put my money on Parcells
and his agent.  They have a history of doing it.
56.2951shoulda offered KotiteHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownTue Feb 04 1997 17:419
I think that the Jets really screwed this thing up.

They shoulda gone ahead and tampered all they wanted to with Tuna.

Then they coulda claimed Rich Kotite was gonna be the compensation.
Kotite is definitely worth a firsted round pick, to the other team,
anyway.

TTom
56.2952They'll get the number oneAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Feb 04 1997 17:415
    
    
    
      Is consulting considered a football type positon?  If so I expect
    Taglibue to dress down the Jets for this.
56.2953MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Tue Feb 04 1997 17:4610
I can see Parcells consulting with Gutman during the draft:

"Another doughnut, Bill?"

"No thanks, I trying to PACE myself."

Sounds like they should present a couple of proposals to
an arbitrator for compenstation and be done with it.

Mike
56.2954PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Feb 04 1997 18:161
    Reportedly, Parcells wants Manning for when he takes over next year.
56.2955SNAX::ERICKSONTue Feb 04 1997 19:058
    
    	Kraft mentioned Douglass, Glenn and Johnson in the context of a
    joke, thus no tampering. Possible just a reminder from Tagliabue not
    to mention names, even in passing/joking. On the other hand the Jets
    are openly trying to circumvent Parcells contract with the Patriots,
    as well as the ruling Tagliabue made last week, BIG TIME TAMPERING.
    
    Ron
56.2956MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Feb 04 1997 19:222
    But the Jets are hoping to force Tagliabue's hand and get him to set a
    price.  The #1 of all picks is far too steep.
56.2957MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Feb 04 1997 19:306
  >>  But the Jets are hoping to force Tagliabue's hand and get him to set a
  >>  price.  The #1 of all picks is far too steep.
    
      Why? Look at all of the hoops the Jets are willing to jump through
      to get Tuna including flaunting the commish's ruling? Looks like
      he's worth the first pick to me.
56.2958EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Feb 04 1997 19:486
    
    Bill Belichick must have little to no pride to be pawned around
    like this...
    
    glenn
    
56.2959PCBUOA::MORGANTue Feb 04 1997 20:465
    Not only the Belichick angle, but how do you think the players are 
    going to respond knowing he's only there for a year!  The whole thing 
    is pretty bizzare.
    
    					Steve
56.2960tunsrv2-tunnel.imc.das.dec.com::dfaustDennis FaustTue Feb 04 1997 21:4315
I must be missing something. The Commish ruled that Parcell could only coach 
for the Pats next year. The Jets haven't hired him to be a coach, just a 
consultant. Howexactly does this constitute disobeying Tags ruling? 

I do believe that the Jets tampered, however, since they have a history of 
doing it in the past. They tampered with Kotite when he was with the Eagles, 
but the stupid Eagles never persued it with the NFL. Maybe the Eagles knew 
they would never get a favorable ruling from the NFL and that's why they let 
it drop. 

I really think that Kraft blew it, since he get stuck with a lot of nothing, 
unles he seriously caves in and let the jets have him for a considerably 
reduced cost.

Dennis Faust
56.2961SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Wed Feb 05 1997 00:2714
    I don't think Kraft blew anything.  What he lost was Parcells coaching
    in the 5th year.  Now that someone is knocking on his door to retain
    Bill's services, Kraft has some bargaining power.  He isn't paying Bill
    to coach next year, as would be the case if Bill was fired and didn't
    get another coaching job.  Bill's not coaching, and Bob's not paying. 
    Fair deal.  Now if the Jets want Bill, they have to appease Bob's
    demands.  If they don't, Bob won't agree to let Bill go.
    
    Now that this consulting thing has come up, I think it's an overt
    attempt by the Jets to force Kraft's hand and to get the league
    involved.  I believe Kraft is undoubtedly caucusing with his legal
    staff over this turn of events to see what his options are.
    
    	Ted
56.2962happy with Kraft's dealings...IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Wed Feb 05 1997 11:4726
    RE: .2960
    
    Dennis,
    
    I think the interpretation might have been broader than "Parcells can't
    *coach* for another team in 1997".  I believe it was more like "he
    can't actively participate in the workings of another team in 1997".
    He's not supposed to have anything to do with the football operations of
    another team.
    
    I'm pretty happy with the way Kraft has handled this - he's indicated 
    that he won't let himself (or the Patriots) get walked over.  My only
    fear is that Tagliabue will cave in considerably given that it's time
    to negotiate the new TV contract and he wants to keep New York and its
    fans happy.  I wish the Jets would get their collective pee-pees
    spanked by Tagliabue for trying to show him up.
    
    If the Pats end up with *anything*, it's that much more than what they
    would have had.  It's a no-lose situation - the worst you do is break
    even.  Parcells was gone regardless.
    
    -Roland
    
    P.S.  And for anyone who doesn't believe the Jets were tampering, I've
    	  got a stadium in a swamp that I'd like to sell you...
    
56.2963EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 05 1997 12:2015
    
> I really think that Kraft blew it, since he get stuck with a lot of nothing, 
> unles he seriously caves in and let the jets have him for a considerably 
> reduced cost.
    
    He's got Parcells in the position of de facto GM of the Jets, which
    given Parcells' track record could pay dividends to the Pats down 
    the road.  The man is only a threat when he's standing on the
    sidelines.
    
    How long until Neil O'Donnell is dumped?  You know he's not a "Bill
    Parcells-type" player...
    
    glenn
          
56.2964PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Feb 05 1997 12:238
You got it love it. YesMyra (tm - for butch on the cape) talked tough and got
it handed to him. The ruling stated imo that no football decisions could be
made by Parcells as a consultant he only advises he doesn't make the ultimate
decision and hence YesMyra gets caught with his Pants down as does
Taligibue........

mc
56.2965MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Feb 05 1997 12:2716
    
  >> He's got Parcells in the position of de facto GM of the Jets, which
  >> given Parcells' track record could pay dividends to the Pats down 
  >> the road.  The man is only a threat when he's standing on the
  >> sidelines.
    
  >> How long until Neil O'Donnell is dumped?  You know he's not a "Bill
  >> Parcells-type" player...
    
     Exactly what I was thinking on both counts. Let Bill be their
     personnel guy. The Jets don't have any cap room as it is, letting
     Bill loose will only screw them until Haley's Comet returns. 
     Here he had Bobby Grier to save him from himself. Down in New
     York, it'll be interesting to see if Parcells' lips move when
     Bellicheck talks. And O'Donnell is a goner especially at his salary. 
     If Bill could, he'd dope slap whoever signed Neil. 
56.2966PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Feb 05 1997 12:438
Why isn't OD a Parcells' type guy? Superbowl aside he's been a low-turnover
guy who doesn't audiable much and doesn't try to do things he's uncapable
of. He can handle critism or atleast could when in Pitt. While he's probably
not happy with his salary why cut him when the contract is quaranteed. OD
can get you there but can he win it is another matter......

 mike
56.2967EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 05 1997 12:579
    
>    Why isn't OD a Parcells' type guy?
    
    He's a big sissy, without the physical skills of a Drew Bledsoe to at 
    least partially make up for it.  Of course his stats are high-percentage; 
    if it isn't there he hits the turf and takes the sack.
    
    glenn
    
56.2968Looney TunesODIXIE::ZOGRANIt's around here somewhereWed Feb 05 1997 13:1210
    All you Jets fans better start calling the front office now, before
    they seriously consider hiring Falcons ex-GM (VP of Player Ops) Ken
    Herock.  He of the Audrey Bruce draft (#1), Brett Favre trade and Jeff
    George debacle.

    Parcells the puppetmaster and Herock the personnel man.  And here I
    thought the Falcons had a lock on the bottom rung.

    UMDan
    
56.2969MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Feb 05 1997 13:397
    O'Donnell in the biggest Steeler game in 15 years didn't play any sissy
    role.  He was the one with the guts, standing in the pocket and having
    to throw pin-point passes to tightly guarded receivers.
    
    As Mikey says it was poor coaching that set up the situation which
    caused the breakdown and final interception.  That interception never
    happens under Parcells.
56.2970EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 05 1997 13:4311
>    As Mikey says it was poor coaching that set up the situation which
>    caused the breakdown and final interception.  That interception never
>    happens under Parcells.
    
    Right.  That's why Parcells abandoned the running game in Super Bowl
    XXXI to a far greater extent than Cowher would ever think of, and 
    Bledsoe throws four picks.  Get a clue billte...
    
    glenn
    
56.2971PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Feb 05 1997 13:5614
I'm still wondering how he got:

>    As Mikey says it was poor coaching that set up the situation which
>    caused the breakdown and final interception.  

 out of the line  "Superbowl aside...." ?????????

especially when I argued that Neil ala Drew Blewit caved in to soon on the play
last year and paniced. Also like Drew Blewit blaming the receiver for missing
the read and not hisself............

mc
    
56.2972now here's some real follyHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownWed Feb 05 1997 14:2610
The Pats and Jets are pretenders.

Oakland is showing that it's the real idjit in the league. Firsted of
all, they promote a proven non-winner as a haid coach.

Now they're going for Jeff George. 

Hoss is gonna be cut loose and possibly going to the Burgh.

TTom
56.2973MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Feb 05 1997 14:2414
    Glenn how can you compare the interception vs Dallas with any of the
    interceptions that Bledsoe had.  Parcells made a strategy decision
    based on his only fullback he could depend on being out.  He felt he
    could put 21-27 points on the board and did hit the low number.  He
    hoped that special teams and defense could hold GreenBay and was wrong.
    
    Cowher had a running game but panicked late and had O'Donnell is risky
    passing situations without the authority to play call his way out of
    them.  Parcells understands that if you have to put it in the air a lot
    it will be intercepted but you can't afford those interceptions in the
    flat which Cowher teams do so often.
    
    Mikey you had said something I agreed with but you're right not in the
    context I put you in.
56.2974MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Feb 05 1997 14:4210
    
    
    >> That's why Parcells abandoned the running game in Super Bowl
    >> XXXI to a far greater extent than Cowher would ever think of, 
    >> and Bledsoe throws four picks.  
    
       A) Parcells pulled Cowher's underwear up over his head when 
       their two teams met in the playoffs to the tune of 28-3 and
       B) it ain't Tuna's fault or because of a lack of a running
       game that Drew overthrew and underthrew receiver after receiver. 
56.2975EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 05 1997 14:4922
    
>       A) Parcells pulled Cowher's underwear up over his head when 
>       their two teams met in the playoffs to the tune of 28-3 and
    
    Non sequitur.  I wasn't comparing the overall coaching caliber of 
    these two.  Just pointing out that Parcells quit on the running 
    game, and (with a flawed or inexperienced QB), interceptions are
    the price.
    
>       B) it ain't Tuna's fault or because of a lack of a running
>       game that Drew overthrew and underthrew receiver after receiver. 
    
    Likewise O'D's two horrendous decisions/passes weren't Cowher's fault.
    Except in billte's foggy memory, that is.  In the clutch it'll all
    happen again for O'D under Parcells, if Parcells sticks with him that
    is.
    
    O'D was sucking up pretty good to Parcells yesterday, I have to admit.
    
    glenn    
    
                                                                          
56.2976CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westWed Feb 05 1997 15:219
    RE:  Raiders
    
    >Now they're going for Jeff George.
    >Hoss is gonna be cut loose and possibly going to the Burgh.
    
    aaaaaarrrrrrrrgggggggghhhhhhhhh
    
    Marc
    
56.2977MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Feb 05 1997 16:316
    
      Jeff George seems like a perfect Raider fit. A guy nobody
     else wants, who probably doesn't even get along with his own
     mother and will be fighting with everyone from the opposing
     d-line to his own equipment manager. It's a match made in 
     heaven.
56.2978RE: Odonnell...HOTLNE::SHIELDSThu Feb 06 1997 05:097
    RE: .2966
             >(Odonnell) doesn't try to do things he's incapable of<
    
    Sure he does. He plays QB:)!
    
    
    Gary S
56.2979MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Feb 06 1997 12:035
    Surely we haven't gone from "O'Donnell blew the Superbowl with a stupid
    pass" to O'Donnell is a poor quarterback?  Surely none of the standard
    Steeler contingent thinks the latter and even Tommy Brydie, who rightly
    questions O'Donnell's judgement doesn't seem to think that O'Donnell is
    less than one of the better quarterbacks around.
56.2980"One of the better QBs"? Shrooms away...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Feb 06 1997 14:1712
>    Steeler contingent thinks the latter and even Tommy Brydie, who rightly
>    questions O'Donnell's judgement doesn't seem to think that O'Donnell is
>    less than one of the better quarterbacks around.
    
    Huh?  At his most glowing maybe Tommy raised the bar to "mediocre".
    He beat him up as a Steeler and remained consistent as he moved to
    the Jets.  You've got to stop speaking for Childs and Brydie and the
    like from this position of yours in the Alternate Universe, billte...
    
    glenn
     
56.2981MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Feb 06 1997 14:396
    
      I figured O'Donnell was "good enough" for a Jets team
     that I feel has a lot of very good young talent. But OD
     revealed himself as a gutless punk over the course of the
     last year or so. Like I said about Bledsoe, I can deal with 
     stupid but scared is another matter.
56.2982Media won't be ultimate judge of O'DonnellMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Feb 06 1997 14:5711
    Well I haven't seen that side of O'Donnell.  Certainly I didn't see it
    in the Superbowl of 1996.  
    
    Glenn, given the unanimity of the Steeler contingent on O'Donnell I
    blame it on these newsletters you all subscribe to: Lambert's letter,
    Bradshaw's nose, Jack Hams down and dirty latest Pitt skinny.
    
    We have all these lovely myths: Switzer can't coach, O'Donnell is a
    coward, Parcells is a genius, Cowher can coach...   Leaving sprotsters
    out of the mix if you follow the popular media interpretations you are
    dealing with fairy tales.
56.2983EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Feb 06 1997 16:1511
    
>    Glenn, given the unanimity of the Steeler contingent on O'Donnell I
>    blame it on these newsletters you all subscribe to: Lambert's letter,
>    Bradshaw's nose, Jack Hams down and dirty latest Pitt skinny.
    
    I have no idea what the hail you're talking about.  I subscribe to 
    *zero* Steeler newsletters.  I do subscribe to the NFL's Sunday Ticket
    and actually watch the games though...
    
    glenn
    
56.2984Here's a game to watchMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Feb 06 1997 16:364
    Glenn you may want to watch a certain Hartford - Bruins contest
    tonight.  A win by the Bruins puts them ahead of Hartford although the
    usually reliable Ms Karen O' Derry didn't post the standings this early
    am.  Maybe the shock of me roaring past her in da pool hasn't worn off.
56.2985CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Feb 06 1997 18:243
But Bill, the point is still moot as the Whalers have a game in hand.


56.2986MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Feb 06 1997 19:193
    I didn't know that Frank.  Karen didn't post the standings, probably
    slept in after a particularly late night or something.  Hope she wasn't
    hitting the action in Clinton.
56.2987still off the subject but....HOTLNE::SHIELDSFri Feb 07 1997 06:288
    RE: .2979
    Nope. I'm not basing my assessment on the Superbowl. I have never in
    his history felt that O'donnell was any good. I never thought he was a
    coward, though.  It takes guts to pretend to be a QB and make millions
    of dollars in the NFL:)! 
    
    
     Gary S.
56.2988SHARE::DERRYColor me impressed...Fri Feb 07 1997 08:502
    Yo, Billte... as always, the standings get posted on Monday morning.
    Spark up another...
56.2989slapped back down again.SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Fri Feb 07 1997 11:423
I don't think Bill wants to see them anymore.

daryll
56.2990MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Feb 07 1997 18:196
    In case anyone's wondering I told Glenn back in December that I was
    going to bet Frank Way that the B's would beat out the Whalers in the
    end.  Glenn said forget Frank I'll take you on and give you 2:1.
    
    This is the second time the B's have started to close in and then blew
    it.  All in all:  O'Donnell > Kaspar
56.2991SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Fri Feb 07 1997 18:211
Do try not to confuse "blew it" with "outplayed" again.
56.2992IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Fri Feb 07 1997 18:3710
    
    RE:   All in all:  O'Donnell > Kaspar
    
    Finally - Steve Kasper's main apologist begins to come to his senses.
    
    Of course, there's an infinitely long left side of the expression that
    has been left out...
    
    	[...]  small furry rodent .GT. Elway .GT. O'Donnell .GT. Kasper
    
56.2993CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Feb 10 1997 12:044
Well, Homer Votaire Plato, I think he's got it....finally...



56.2994Congratulations Mr KraftMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Feb 11 1997 12:4710
    I think Kraft engineered quite a ploy.  First he gets rid of a coach he
    doesn't want for personal reasons pretty well covered elsewhere.  He
    pulls it off in such a way that the coach makes his deal telling the
    new team that he won't require compensation.  Kraft then convinces the
    commish that the writing indeed says "permission" eg compensation. 
    Finally, he willingly plays the fool for the greater good by blabbing
    about #1 in the land and Keyshawn, Douglas or fight when his objective
    is to raise the ante in the bargaining as high as possible.
    
    Result:  Four draft choices for essentially nothing.
56.2995snookeredHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownTue Feb 11 1997 13:135
I'm with you on this one, billte.

And I think Kraft oughta be ashamed snookering that ol' Leon Hess.

TTom
56.2996EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Feb 11 1997 13:2712
    
>    Result:  Four draft choices for essentially nothing.
    
    Yep.  The irony is that the Pats only hit this jackpot because 
    Parcells helped take them to the Super Bowl.  Say, had the Pats not
    made the playoffs, it was pretty much expected that Parcells would
    have been hitting the road at the end of the season, free and clear,
    no questions asked.  The dispute around all of this evolved as the 
    Pats advanced deeper into the playoffs.
    
    glenn
    
56.2997PECAD8::CHILDSTue Feb 11 1997 13:325
 So much for the league wanting to make the Jets' stronger that all the local
 yahoos on the radio thought was going to happen. 

mc
56.2998CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Feb 11 1997 13:365
  Well if Parcells uses his 1st picks well this year and next and has the Jets
in playoff contention by 1999 that 1st round pick 3 years out is not going to
be all that much of a loss. 

  George
56.2999MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Feb 11 1997 14:3615
  >> Well if Parcells uses his 1st picks well this year and next 
  >> and has the Jets in playoff contention by 1999 that 1st round 
  >> pick 3 years out is not going to be all that much of a loss. 

     Parcells has the first pick in the draft. He'd have to be an
     idiot to screw that up and Parcells is no idiot. Still, this
     is a *great* deal for the Patsies. The 3rd and 4th round are 
     where the bargains come. The Jets 2nd rounder next year figures 
     to be a quality pick and in 1999 I don't care where the Jets
     are supposed to pick a 1st rounder is very much of a loss be-
     cause if your 1st rounder sucks, your 2nd rounder sucks that
     much more. I think this deal is even better than the number one 
     overall for the Pats.
    
56.3000this *is* easy HBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownTue Feb 11 1997 14:538
I think idiocy is something easily achieve.

Let's suppose he takes Payton Manning and he turns out to be the nexted
Heath Shuler.

As for this being a *great* deal, we most certainly agree on this.

TTom
56.3001MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Feb 11 1997 14:538
    
       If Parcells drafts anyone but Orlando Pace, he's nuts.
    
    
       BTW - after yesterday's press conference, does anyone
             else think that Leon Hess ain't never gonna live 
             to see the Jets win the SB? Eeven if it's next
             year?
56.3002Don't let the door hit ya...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Feb 11 1997 14:5520
    
    You never know, losing Parcells in this fashion could be one of the 
    best things ever to happen to this franchise, just as gaining him was.  
    If you believe in the "teach them how to win" philosophy, well, the 
    Pats already got that training from Parcells.  As to taking them to 
    the next level, where there's some consistency and stability, maybe 
    Parcells isn't your man for that anyway.
    
    The number and placement of these picks rivals what Dallas got for 
    Herschel Walker, for a team that's already a winner.  Use them wisely,
    and who knows how things turn out (of course there is a fair amount 
    of luck involved, with the draft).
    
    I don't have any bitter feelings towards Parcells, but I have tired
    of his act.  This may be the start of a new era, and a very positive
    one.
    
    glenn
    
                                      
56.3003looking badHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownTue Feb 11 1997 15:108
Next year? Hail, ol' Leon looks like he may not make it to spring
practices.

And Pace aint no sure bet. And certainly not quickly.  There's a lot of
uncertainty in his position not the least of which are development and
injuries. FWIW, I think he should be a star, too, but whatta I know...

TTom
56.3004CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Feb 11 1997 15:2413
I dunno, I kinda thought Kraft looked like a boob.  After all that babbling
about the #1 overall pick, and then naming the three Jets (super)star player,
he ends up with four draft picks.

Picks aren't bad, would have looked a lot better if he hadn't shot his mouth
off.

Be interesting to see what Parcells does, but I'm bettin' big that for the next
four years, the Jets do better overall than the Giants, *and* that they get
back to The Show before the Giants do.....


'Saw
56.3005MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Feb 11 1997 15:278
    
    >> Picks aren't bad, would have looked a lot better if he hadn't 
    >> shot his mouth off.
    
       The squeaky wheel gets the grease. If Kraft had gone along to get 
       along he probably wouldn't have gotten squat. Tagliabue knew he had
       to appease Kraft and gave him a nice deal quite comparable to gett-
       ing the number one overall. 
56.3006WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Tue Feb 11 1997 15:386
    
    The Pats make out fantastic with this deal.
    
    Squish the TunaFish!!!!!
    
    - Sean
56.3007Jets in serious salary cap troubleTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Tue Feb 11 1997 16:0313
    Jets right now are about $3 million over the salary cap.  They must
    sign the #1 pick, which will push them even further over the cap. 
    Unless they can get some sucker team to take Neil O'Donnell off their
    hands, they will have to unload several talented players just to get
    under the cap.  Then, after Parcells brings in William Roberts, Dave
    Meggett, and some of his other old buddies, they'll have to cut some
    more players.  Even given this, I think the Jets, with the Parcells push
    and the easy schedule, will finish .500 next year, but slip to 6-10 or
    so the following season.
    
    NAZZ
    
    
56.3008quite the accomplishmentHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownTue Feb 11 1997 16:277
If'n Tuna can get the Jets over .500 nexted year, he should win the NFL 
COY.

I myself am not so optimistic. You have a systemic condition with the
Jets. The entire enterprise seems committed to losing.

TTom
56.3009What do I knowODIXIE::ZOGRANTerps rising like a Phoenix!Tue Feb 11 1997 16:456
    Didn't Pace refuse an MRI at the combine?  Reports also say he hasn't
    missed any meals since the Rose Bowl.  Not saying that he may not turn
    out great.  But then again the Falcons thought Andrey(sp) Bruce was the
    second coming of LT.
    
    UMDan
56.3010MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Feb 11 1997 16:5610
    So 'Saw (not to put words in your mouth, but) are you saying that if
    you're Kraft you would have preferred to look good with a couple of 3s
    rather than get 3,4,2,1 and not care what people think.
    
    The number 1 overall was never a possibility within the football world. 
    Parcells never would have allowed it.
    
    Then again there's the problem of all the lying.  Could you imagine,
    say, having to work someplace where people constantly say things which
    time proves that they knew weren't true all along?
56.3011WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Tue Feb 11 1997 17:1712
    
    > The number 1 overall was never a possibility within the football world. 
    > Parcells never would have allowed it.
    
    This is yet to be seen.
    
    Tagliabue may get what he most feared after all, just not this year. 
    Remember, this is BP controlling personell now.  By the time his
    overpriced underachieving picks drag the team down in a few years,
    we may in fact be a Super Bowl team getting a #1 overall pick...  :^)
    
    - Sean
56.3012WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Tue Feb 11 1997 17:2115
    
> If'n Tuna can get the Jets over .500 nexted year, he should win the NFL 
> COY.
    
    This is the only thing that sort of bugs me.  I think the Jets have
    a pretty good team.  There's a lot of hidden talent that went to waste.
    In fact, I think the Jets win 8 games last year under practically any
    other mediocre coach in the world.
    
    BP couldn't have timed it better to come in and win 8 games, but it
    will be a faux 8 wins in my book, better on paper, but not really
    better than the team was this year.  He'll come off like a savior,
    though, that is, until the effect of his GM decisions kick in.
    
    - Sean
56.3013we shall seeHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownTue Feb 11 1997 17:4610
I hear what you're saying, Sean.

Certainly, the Jets haplessness cannot be simply blamed on lack of
talent. However, certain questions loom large, like who'll play QB, who
will be sent home, who else is coming in, etc.

FWIW, If'n I were a p-name wagerer, I'd wager against .500. However, I
really don't that much concern about this issue...

TTom
56.3014PECAD8::CHILDSTue Feb 11 1997 18:1411
What Taglibue did was basically hold Leon Hess down while Kraft raped him and
Kraft still whined. What a wussy. 

You guys make me laugh as far as you're concerned it's a given that Parcells
the GM will murder the Jets. It took Parcells a while to "get it" as a coach,
with any luck he's finally going to "get it" as a GM. For the JETS' sake I hope
so cause basically they've been forced to give up 4 starters for no good reason
at all. 

mc
56.3015win-winHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownTue Feb 11 1997 18:2610
>What Taglibue did was basically hold Leon Hess down while Kraft raped him ...

And ol' Leon din't just lay back and enjoy it, neither.

Hey, I think this has to be viewed as a win-win situation. The Pats and
their faithful seem to be telling Tuna "don't go away mad, just go away."
And the Jets camp seems really elated, almost hopeful, that at the least
they have a coach who's been to the big dance 3 times and won twice.

TTom
56.3016SNAX::ERICKSONTue Feb 11 1997 20:387
    
    	I think its a good deal for the Patriots. Parcells will only have
    TWO seasons with the Jets, before he has to give up his #1 to the
    Pats. I don't see Parcells taking a 1-15 team and reaching the playoffs
    in 2 seasons. So the that #1 should be a top 20 pick.
    
    Ron
56.3017MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Wed Feb 12 1997 15:517
The Pats were 1-15 and made the playoffs in 2 seasons.

Still, the Pats made out in this deal.  Kraft may have
looked a little foolish backing down, but the Pats wouldn't
have gotten the same deal if he didn't kick and scream.

Mike
56.3018raise ticket pricesHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownWed Feb 12 1997 15:535
and the word now is all the other teams are complaing to Tagliabue about
how this is gonna drive up the salaries that they're gonna have to pay
the other coaches

TTom
56.3019WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Wed Feb 12 1997 16:039
    
    Ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!!!
    
    What, this is a surprise to them?
    
    I'm still hoping for the day when the whole kit and kaboodle comes
    crashing down and we get to start over.  Baseball's real close.
    
    - Sean
56.3020maybe NBAHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownWed Feb 12 1997 16:0913
>Baseball's real close.

I think the NBA is there. They seem to be about maxed out and for the
firsted time I can remember, some players are taking a real cut in pay.
Walt Williams, Rex Chapman and some others went from millions to minimum,
a sign of possible fiscal management in the league.

With MLB, many in the ranks are getting fewer dollars than afore.

The problem is that in both cases those at the top end are still climbing
in salaries.

TTom
56.3021Baseball in a football note, oh myODIXIE::ZOGRANTerps rising like a Phoenix!Wed Feb 12 1997 16:1118
    "Baseball's real close" - we may have to move this discussion, but I
    agree with this statement.  Here in Atlanta they are about 10% behind
    season ticket sales relative to where they were last year, and this
    with a new Camden Yard/Jacob Field type park.  Some folks who had $17
    field level seats are now paying $20 for seats that are farther away or
    $30 (yes $30) for seats in the same relative location.

    And now that the Braves, not the county, are in charge of
    concessions you won't be able to bring in your own food or beverages. 
    Looks like the amount of games I'm going to be able to attend is going
    to go down this season.

    Professional sports attendance is getting to be more and more a
    corporate write-off type of occasion.  Once the economy takes a dip
    (always happens) and the corps get out, teams will fold. IMO, YMMV

    UMDan
    off