[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hbahba::cam_sports

Title:Sports 93-96 Archive. No new notes allowed
Notice:Chainsaw's last standSPORTS_97
Moderator:HBAHBA::HAAS
Created:Mon Jan 11 1993
Last Modified:Tue Apr 15 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:302
Total number of notes:117855

61.0. "RIP: Cleveland Browns" by LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR (CaVs will win it all!) Thu Jan 14 1993 12:18

    
    	QUOTE FROM ART MODEL:  We have gone long enough...3 years...
    
    	The Browns will not miss the playoffs this year!
    
    	The Browns will win a division title within 3 years!
    
    	The Browns will get the home field advantage throughout the
    playoffs within 3 years!
    
    
    				OR
    
    	"I will sell the team and move out of town."
    
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
61.1QUASER::JACKSONTAA2 brings out the hypocritesThu Jan 14 1993 12:444
      Shouldn't be to hard as long as they don't choke like other teams
    from the central.
    
      Tim
61.2MKFSA::LONG"just keep it between the lines"Thu Jan 14 1993 14:587
	Tim,

	One thing about choking on the old chicken bone...

	At least the one choking was invited to the table to eat!

	Bill
61.3Bernie...back to number 1 in 93LUDWIG::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Thu Jan 14 1993 16:487
    
    	If I was going to choke....I wouldn't have gone in the first place.
    
    	The writting was on the wall!
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.4PFSVAX::JACOBSqueelers = Loser Girly Mons Thu Jan 14 1993 18:5829
    
    >>     <<< Note 61.0 by LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR "CaVs will win it all!" >>>
    >>                     -< CLEVELAND BROWNS 'DAWGS' >-

    
    >>	QUOTE FROM ART MODEL:  We have gone long enough...3 years...
    
    >>	The Browns will not miss the playoffs this year!
    
    >>	The Browns will win a division title within 3 years!
    
    >>	The Browns will get the home field advantage throughout the
    >>playoffs within 3 years!
    
    
    >>				OR
    
    >>	"I will sell the team and move out of town."
    
    
    Well, HAL, at least ya only got to wait three years before you get a
    REAL owner who may not meddle, eh???
    
    ANd only 7-100 years to get the 'Spots in the Super Bowl.
    
    JaKe
    

    
61.5Browns will be in the playoffs this year!STRATA::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Fri Jan 15 1993 13:0531
    
    If Art would ever leave the team, I would not be very happy.  I happen
    to think Art is one of the better owners in this league.  We have
    always put out a good team, even their worst of teams arn't that bad.
    Now, lets look at the owners of the Pats......on second thought....no,
    lets not.
    
    	An interesting stat - Even though the Browns have not made the
    playoffs in their last three years, they still lead the entire NFL
    with post season appearences.  And to beat that, they have been in
    the league less years than the teams that are tied with them...ie -
    Giants and Rams.
    
    	Art has vowed to be *VERY* active in this years free agency.  Look
    for the Browns to pick up some offensive linemen.
    
    	The Browns will also be looking at who will get the ball in the 
    backfield.....Vardell or Hoard.
    
    	The Browns will go with Bernie Kosar no matter what.  He *is*
    expected to have a full recovery from the surgery.
    
    	Art has expressed a *major* concern for BB to do something about
    the offense this year...expect it to get done!  It has been listed
    as his top priority this year.
    
    	I'll post the artical about the state of the Browns next week.
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.6CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsFri Jan 15 1993 13:0812
>    	An interesting stat - Even though the Browns have not made the
>    playoffs in their last three years, they still lead the entire NFL
>    with post season appearences.  And to beat that, they have been in
>    the league less years than the teams that are tied with them...ie -
>    Giants and Rams.
    
Probably the best statement one could make in light of this is

	Yeah, but what have you done for me lately......


8^)
61.7sign'em up ArtROULET::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Sat Jan 23 1993 12:1513
    
    	Word comming out of New York is that the Browns will sign
    
    		Reggie White.....
    
    
    	Good move Cleveland!
    
    		
    	Go Dawgs!
    
    		WOOF!
    
61.8Reggie has the final say.ELMAGO::BENBACAI've Got Three Knees!!Sat Jan 23 1993 17:323
    Hahahahahah. Yea Right. He wants to go to a winner. Not another
    pretender. *:^)
                
61.9STATE OF THE 'ART'JUNCO::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Mon Jan 25 1993 16:0339
    
    	In front of more than 50 reporters, six television cameras and a
    live radio audience Dec. 30, Art Modell held one of his most
    entertaining and informative "State of the Browns" press conferences. 
    And at the same time, gave Coach Bill Belichick a ringing endorsement
    and gave himself an ultimatum.
    	Modell spoke and fielded questions strongly and cadidly for close
    to an hour.  The conference focused on four topics:
    	1.  He expects the team to win at least a division title and
    homefield advantage in the playoffs before Head Coach Bill Belichick's
    contract expires after the 1995 season, and if it doesn't happen, he
    pledged he will give up control of the Browns.
    	"I'll make this statement.  I'm putting myself on the spot by
    saying this, but I'm so positive of Bill Belichick's future here and
    that of the Cleveland Browns' organization, that if we don't get the 
    job done by the end of his contract, I will get out of football and
    leave Cleveland.  I'm so positive he's going to do it I'm not going to
    be looking for new excuses.
    	"He's the last head coach I hired.  I will not hire another head
    coach.  That's how positive, how comfortable I am.  If you know him as
    well as I do, and I know he's not the easiest guy to get to know.  I
    mean, he's no Don Rickles, let's face it."
    	The "Don Rickles" remark referred to Belichick's reputation as
    stoic and taciturn.
    	Modell was asked if the Browns had to reach the Super Bowl to meet
    his goal.
    	"I avoided saying that because I could see a headline, 'Modell:
    Super Bowl 1998 or Bust.'  All I can say is I expect this franchise to
    be an elite NFL franchise this city will be proud of.  I don't want to
    put a label on what success means.  We all know what success is, but I
    have my own designs and ambitions.  But if I can't get the job done
    with Bill, I gave you the alternative.
    	"I will say it'll take more than a wild-card spot to make me happy. 
    My first goal is to get back into the playoffs with homefield
    advantage.  That's how you get ahead in this business."
    
    
    
    	WOOF!!
61.10STATE OF THE 'ART'JUNCO::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Mon Jan 25 1993 16:0922
    
    	2.  Modell's convinced more than ever Belichick is the coach to
    lead the Browns to a championship.
    	"I interviewed Bill Belichick in February 1991 and before I hired
    him I had an awfully good feeling I'd hired the right man.  A year
    later we were 6-10, and I was supremely confident I had found the right
    man.  A year later, at 7-9, I'm absolutely positive, beyond any measure
    of doubt, I have a winning coach who's going to bring the Browns back
    to where (they belong), and very soon, too.
    	"I've seen the man operate under adverse conditions.  I've seen the
    man bounce off the mat after one disastrous loss after another that
    took the heart out of the organization, especially after the (Dec. 27)
    Oilers game.  I feel very, very good about the future.  I'm more
    optimistic about the Cleveland Browns today than I've been in a long,
    long time.
    	"Bill has an absolute passion for winning.  He shares my passion
    for winning.  He shares the core players on this team's feeling for
    winning.
    
    
    
    	WOOF!!!
61.11STATE OF THE 'ART'JUNCO::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Mon Jan 25 1993 16:1832
    
    	3.  Modell said the offense and offensive corrdinator situation was
    the top priority for the off-season:
    	"We have started the process of evaluating the entire organization,
    like we do every year.  Our offense, the scheme, the design,
    coordination - call it what you want - will be given top priority.  I
    have my own personal views, which I haven't even shared with Bill, and
    I owe him the courtesy of sharing it with him first."
    	Modell inferred Bilichick should delegate more of the offensive
    load.
    	"Bill didn't come in charge of the offense," Modell said.  "He came 
    in charge of the whole team.  If there's a deficiency there, we'll
    correct it, we'll cure it.  I didn't hire him as an offensive
    coordinator.  In fact, I don't believe in that.  The great head coaches
    delegated authority and stayed in their supervisory position.
    	"He wasn't hired as an offensive coordinator.  Let me suffice to
    say, we will have a more organized approach to the offensive side of
    the ball in some form, some fashion, in 1993."
    	Modell was asked what his reaction would be if Belichick doesn't
    want an offensive coordinator or tries to keep the present offensive
    scheme as is.
    	"I would want him to explain to me why we don't need somebody," 
    Modell said.  "It would be a hard sale."
    	One of the first moves Belichick has made reguarding the offense is
    to hire a new line coach.  Hal Hunter will not be back with the Browns
    and it is expected a coach will be hired who has more run-blocking
    expertise.
    
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.12STATE OF THE 'ART'JUNCO::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Mon Jan 25 1993 16:2421
    
    	4.  Modell vowed to make relations between the team and media
    better.  This is significant because there's been an increasingly
    widened gap between the Browns and local media in recent years.
    	"I want to offer a New Year's resolution and apologize to members
    of the media for any things we did to offend you last year.  I want to
    pledge that a new slate will begin in 1993 and, in a reciprocal way, I
    would hope you would clean the slate, and I accept your apologies.  My
    intent is to change some of our rules regarding our media relations. 
    Hopefully, I have some ideas that'll make your job easier in covering
    us and in making us more accessible without interfering with the
    progress we want to make."
    	Modell indicated he thinks Belichick will give more direct answers
    to reporters' questions in the future.
    	"You people (reporters) are entitled to forthrightness and candor. 
    He might not tell you everything, but he should try to make your job
    easier."
    
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.13CNTROL::CHILDStake me to Roslyn CafeMon Jan 25 1993 16:275
awfully big of Art to accept their apologies......

mike_who_thinks_this_State of the "Art"_belongs in note 27....

;^)
61.14CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Jan 25 1993 16:4811
Let's see.

 	6-10, 7-9.....


At that rate, it'll be another three years before you can begin to
think about a division title, and four or five before you can start
to think about homefield......


8^)
61.15Just ask Art is next...ROULET::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Tue Jan 26 1993 12:318
    
    	Hearing Art and hoping what he says, he does, really pumps you up.
    I *do* expect to see the Browns in the playoffs this comming year.  
    3 years is long enough!  
    
    	
    	WOOF!
    
61.16Thanks Ozzie!ESKIMO::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Wed Feb 10 1993 11:0610
    
    	The great Ozzie Newsome has been promoted to Assistant Offensive
    Coach yesterday.  Its truely great that the Browns have kept Ozzie
    with the team.  I haven't heard if the Browns have signed an offensive
    coordinator yet but with the title of Assistant Coach, one can only 
    think there is/will be one.
    
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.17Official TitleSTRATA::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Wed Feb 10 1993 13:099
    
    	In the paper I just read....Ozzie Newsome....Assistant (to the head
    coach) of the offense.  Could this actually be the move Art really
    wanted???  I don't know.  Not sure how Ozzie will change the offensive
    scheme of things.  Just hope he does.  Would be nice to see him
    succeed!
    
    
    		WOOF!
61.18huh?QUASER::JACKSONTAQuit dancin' on that table!Wed Feb 10 1993 15:308
      So just what does this mean Hal?  Does this mean he is the offensive
    coordinator or just another coach?   Assistant (to the head coach) of
    the offense means nothing to me unless I'm just missing something here.
    
      REgardless,  does this mean that they will win the division this
    year?
    
      Tim
61.19Not going to predict the title but at least a wild card!ROULET::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Wed Feb 10 1993 16:2714
    
    	Tim,
    		If you read the prior notes on the State of the Art.....
    Art said that there would be a change in the way the Browns run their
    offense.  Last year, Bill B. ran the show on offense.  Now, they have
    made Ozzie his assistant for the offense.  What that means or how much
    of a role Ozzie will play in the design of the offense is still a 
    question in my mind.  Sure, Ozzie knows receivers....but....does he
    know quarterbacks and runningbacks?  Art said he wanted changes.....
    
    		I'm sure there will be more to hear on this deal...
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.20PFSVAX::JACOBBye Larry, And bye Moe &amp; Curly, Too!!Wed Feb 10 1993 18:399
    I just heard that Bernice has been promoted to assistant coach of
    urinal scrubbers after the game at Clevescum's Municipal Sewage dump,
    er Staduium.  He says it will keep his throwing/scrub brush arm in
    terrific shape.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
61.21Why do you do it???STRATA::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Thu Feb 11 1993 12:517
    
    Yea, Right....and your the one who has that job at Squibburg Rust
    Bucket.
    
    
    		Grrrrrrr!
    
61.22PFSVAX::JACOBBreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F UThu Feb 11 1993 18:425
    Nah, don't do it anymore, Hal, had enuf of it during my 4 years in the
    Air Farce, though.
    
    JaKe
    
61.23Shaw AFB, SCESKIMO::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Fri Feb 12 1993 14:0611
    
    Kind of funny you should mention the Air Force...while I was in basic
    training...I think the first day.  The TI was handing out duties for
    everyone and he asks.....Is there anyone here who bowls?  Boy, I
    thought this was great...I love to bowl...I'll get on his good side...
    So, I raised my hand along with one other guy.  The TI says...good, you
    two get to clean the toilet bowls....every morning.  Needless to say,
    I don't volenteer for anything anymore.
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.24How about some help...JUNCO::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Tue Feb 16 1993 13:3611
    
    	The Browns have hired the head coach from Maine.  I don't know much
    about this new Browns coach.....does anyone in here know something
    about the Maine football team?  The head coach was hired as the Browns
    offensive line coach.  Does Maine have a good running attack?  Thats
    what I would guess.  Living up to Art's objective by getting offensive
    help.
    
    
    	WOOF! (wag, wag, wag)
    
61.25CAMONE::WAYJ. Edgar -- G-man wearin' a G-stringTue Feb 16 1993 13:4610
>    Living up to Art's objective by getting offensive
>    help.
    

You have to be very careful getting offensive help.  The paying customers
might not like to be offended.....


8^)

61.26QUASER::JACKSONTAQuit dancin' on that table!Wed Feb 17 1993 16:545
      I also saw in the paper yesterday that the browns hired an offensive
    assistant.  I thought that was Ozzie's job?  More coaches must mean
    more wins?
    
      Tim
61.27CSC32::M_MACGREGORWed Feb 17 1993 17:198
    
    In recent Maine - Northeastern games, Maine put up a decent air attack.
    Then again Northeastern had no pass defense (they did have a passive
    defense though)
    
    I wasn't impressed though.
    
    Marc
61.28PFSVAX::JACOBHope ya starve, Jesse!!Wed Feb 17 1993 18:488
    I cain see it now, in a couple of months we'll hear that line about the
    'Spots having 12,286 assistant coaches and being a shoe-in to win the
    AFC Central this year.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
61.29I guess I'm still hearing those words from years past.STRATA::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Fri Feb 19 1993 13:3213
    
    	Come on guys.....The way I look at it is.....the Browns know they
    have a problem with the offense no scoring enough points and the lack
    of a *real* running attack/blocking scheme.  So, the Browns have begun
    to address the problem.  This guy from Maine seems like a nobody but,
    I'll bet his team improved offensively durring his term there.  
    	Evidently this other guy the Browns got as offensive assistant is
    the assistant to Ozzie.
    	At least the Browns arn't just sitting around doing nothing.  Like
    other teams I know.....ie: Squeelers.
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.30QUASER::JACKSONTAQuit dancin' on that table!Fri Feb 19 1993 15:486
      3 offensive assistants sounds like the need for some right guard;^)
    
      What your saying by stating that you bet the offense gets better with
    this guy from Maine is that it can't be any worse?
    
      Tim
61.31Bernie in troubleSKEWED::MCKAYFri Feb 19 1993 15:526
    I don't know how long the coach from Maine was there, but lately
    Maine's offense has been a good one.  Their QB Mike Buck is holding
    the clipboard somewhere in the NFL (New Orleans maybe?).  Could it be
    the end of Bernie.  College coach trades for his college QB??? 8*)
    
    Jimbo   
61.32PFSVAX::JACOBSee if We care if ya starve, Jesse!!Fri Feb 19 1993 18:5318
    
    >>	At least the Browns arn't just sitting around doing nothing.  Like
    >>other teams I know.....ie: Squeelers.
    
    HAL, the STEELERS went thru a complete change of coaching staff one
    short year ago, and the change in the team was glaring, having fone
    from 7-9 the year before to 11-5 this past year.  Changes in the
    coaching staff aren't necessary at this point.  The team is now working
    on getting the players that fit into the team plans, and unlike the
    final years of the Noll era, they're adapting the offensive and
    defensive schemes to fit the players they have, not trying to get the
    players to change to fit the systems.
    
    Next season will be a major test because the STEELERS have to play a
    division winners type schedule.
    
    JaKe
    
61.33should hear something soon.JUNCO::WHITEHAIRMark Price = 3 pt ace!Sat Mar 27 1993 13:148
    
    	No word out of the Browns headquarters reguarding the Regie White
    deal.........Still think they are in the hunt.  Can't see Regie going
    to the Jets.
    
    	
    	WOOF!
    
61.34PFSVAX::JACOBI met the MonstahSat Mar 27 1993 23:4919
    >>     <<< Note 61.33 by JUNCO::WHITEHAIR "Mark Price = 3 pt ace!" >>>
    >>                    -< should hear something soon. >-

    
    >>	No word out of the Browns headquarters reguarding the Regie White
    >>deal.........Still think they are in the hunt.  Can't see Regie going
    >>to the Jets.
    
    The Steelers haven't gotten into the Reggie Sweepstakes, but Why would
    Reggie even consider Clevescum???  I mean, Philly, as far as cities
    goes nowadays, sucks bigtime, so why would he want to move to
    Clevescum, the world's only inhabitated raw sewage dump?????  Maybe
    they ate the 'Spots cain fergit about signing Testicleverde and sign
    Brister away from the STEELERS and finally have somebody who'll out do
    Bernice.
    
    JaKe
    (8^)*
    
61.36ELMAGO::BENBACALike a Fresh of Breath air!Tue Mar 30 1993 01:323
    >>  Testicleverde
    
    Green filberts?!  :-)
61.37QUASER::JACKSONTACmon baby,finish what you startedFri Apr 02 1993 00:375
        Another Miahami QB on the browns squad,  and no Hal?
    
      Must be on vacation!
    
      Tim
61.38The Bernie & Vinny show...STRATA::WHITEHAIRMark Price = 3 pt ace!Fri Apr 02 1993 11:5914
    
    	Yes, thats right Tim,
    		
    		Testiverdi has signed a one year contract with an option
    	year.  
    		I think this is great!  Venny will work well with the 
    	Browns.  We all know how injury prone Bernie is....  The word
    	out of camp is that there is no question that Bernie is the 
    	starter and he has been told so by BB.  Venny has no quarms about
    	it either.  He knows he will get some playing time.  
    		Good move by the Browns!
    
    
    		WOOF!
61.39CAM3::WAYRIP #7Fri Apr 02 1993 12:3612
>    		Testiverdi has signed a one year contract with an option


Hal, if he's gonna be your new QB, learn how to spell his name.

TestAverdE......  (which probably means green head in italian.....)


'Saw


PS  Now Cleveland has TWO loser QBs.....8^)
61.40No longer will one man be to BLAM...AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingFri Apr 02 1993 14:181
    
61.41PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Apr 02 1993 15:576
61.42CAMONE::WAYRIP #7Fri Apr 02 1993 16:1014
61.43ROYALT::ASHEGuess who just got back today...Fri Apr 02 1993 16:593
    Reggie didn't say he wants to play for a current winner. I thought he
    said he wanted to go somewhere with a commitment to win...
    
61.44CAMONE::WAYRIP #7Fri Apr 02 1993 17:0526
>    Reggie didn't say he wants to play for a current winner. I thought he
>    said he wanted to go somewhere with a commitment to win...


Reggie's waitin' on God to tell him where to play (as if God ain't
busy enough down there in Waco, right?)

So, then Reggie's wanting to go to some place where he can do some
inner city work, and he wants to go to a winner, and he wants this
and he wants that.


If I were Reggie, I'd pick where I want to play, and then let
God guide me to where the inner city work is.  I mean, God's busy, 
he ain't got time to be looking at Tourism Guides for the NFL cities.

By the time Reggie's done with picking the city, then God should have
stuff wrapped up in Waco, and he can probably squeeze Reggie in 
between lunch with the Dali Lama, and working on Boznia.


That's my cut at it......


'Saw    

61.45AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingFri Apr 02 1993 17:074
    	What if God's busy and doesn't tell Reggie who to play for before
    the draft?
    
    				/Don
61.46CAMONE::WAYRIP #7Fri Apr 02 1993 17:1619
>    	What if God's busy and doesn't tell Reggie who to play for before
>    the draft?
    
My guess would be that Reggie would have to make his own choice.


It's kind of like in the last blizzard we had.  I was waiting for my
regular plow guy to come and plow my driveway.   At 5pm Sunday afternoon
the plow guy called and said "all my trucks are out of order -- transmissions
are burned out -- you'll have to make other arrangements".

Here, I'd been waiting for the plow guy (God) to come and plow me (pick
the city I'm gonna play in) and then he was unable to.  So I had
to make other arrangements (Reggie will have to take a chance, grab
his cojones, and pick a place).


hth,
'Saw
61.47PFSVAX::JACOBEmpty SpaceFri Apr 02 1993 23:1812
    
    >>		I think this is great!  Venny will work well with the 
    
    >>	starter and he has been told so by BB.  Venny has no quarms about
    
    Uh, Er, EARTH TO HAL!!!!!   It's V I N N Y, not Venny.  And the lasted
    name is TesticleVerdi.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
61.48unrestrictedSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Jul 06 1993 12:039
    
    	The Browns sign Hessian Jones from the Vikes...
    
    	A little help for the receivers....
    
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.49CAMONE::WAYWashin' the dog, washin' the dogTue Jul 06 1993 12:305
>    	The Browns sign Hessian Jones from the Vikes...
    

Hessian?  What a name.  The guy must be a terror on the field!    

61.50CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Jul 06 1993 15:191
    Hassan, I tink.
61.51He's just in it for the money 'Saw...VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDImus is coming to BostonTue Jul 06 1993 16:021
    
61.52LAGUNA::MAY_BRIntel Inside, again!Tue Jul 06 1993 16:262
    
    The Hessian is coming, The Hessian is coming!
61.53PFSVAX::JACOBFresh off a week of I &amp; IMon Jul 19 1993 23:488
    The anticipation of the annual "HAL" prediction is killing me.
    
    When we gonna get it, Hal???
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
61.54ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Tue Jul 20 1993 03:044
    uh JaKe why the anticipation; it'll be the same as every year. 
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.55TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey and Melanie have a new house...Tue Jul 20 1993 03:113
I'll beat him to the punch:

WOOF, WOOF  OOOOWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOO
61.56 :^)GENRAL::WADEMyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWentTue Jul 20 1993 13:175
    
    	Can someone please tell me the Browns record in AFC championship
    	games against the Broncos.  Thanks......
    
    Claybone
61.57WREATH::DEVLINIt's just time to say hor d'oevre...Tue Jul 20 1993 13:238
Hey, I read in USA Today that the Browns have more kickoff tees than any other
team in the NFL!  This poves they will win it all!  Goes with all them
coaches and weight equipment.   I heard a rumour that they are 3 wet towells
away from replacing the Bengals as the team with most towells!

WOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF

JD_as_Hal
61.58ROYALT::ASHEI like mine with french fried potatoesTue Jul 20 1993 13:511
    Kevin Mack retired yesterday.  Who's their RB?  Vardell and Metcalf?
61.59QUASER::JACKSONTAYes,Calgon took her away!Tue Jul 20 1993 15:087
      They don't have a RB;^)
    
      Why did Mack retire anyway?  Did he coke it up again?
    
      Hal oh Hal, where are thow?
    
      Tim
61.60Go dawgs! PLAYOFFS FOR SURE!STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Jul 20 1993 18:2454
    
    	I also was very surprised about Kevin Mack retireing....didn't
    really expect it.  I guess it was a very emotional speech.  Wish I
    could have seen it.
    
    	About those Browns.............Yes, YES, this is their year!
    	The Browns will make the playoffs this year.  
    
    	Improvement throughout the team.....great free agency signings!
    
    	QB- Bernie is in great health!  Picked up Testiverde who will be
    	a great backup.  Pillcox is still there too.
    
    	RB- Tommy Vardell, Leroy Hoard and Eric Metcalf.  I think Baldwin 
    	is still around too.  Both Leroy and Eric signed big 3 year
        contracts and are actually happy to be in training camp early.
    
    	WR- Look for lawyer Tillman to be the big man this year along with
    	Hassan Jones, Mark Carrier and Michael Jackson.  This area is the
    	most improved.  Forgot about Patric Rowe.
    
    	OL- Another area which has been greatly improved this year.  They
    	say, in Cleveland, that when the Browns got rid of ... ... dam, I
    	can't remember his name right now, but anyway, when they got rid of
    	this guy, the OL line improved three fold.  Says alot for the depth
    	last year...anyway, with the 1st round signing and some big
        pickups in free agency, Bernie will be protected!
    
    
    			Can you believe it....
    
    
    			I said....
    
    
    			BERNIE WILL BE PROTECTED!!!!!
    
    
    	I will update you on the defense in the next couple of days......
    
    
    
    		Mike Johnson signed a one year contract with the Browns
    	and is VERY happy!  So are the Browns!
    
    
    
    	WOOF! WOOF!
    
    	
    		THIS WILL BE THE BEST TEAM IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS
    
    	
    	GO DAWGS!
61.61Buncha nobodiesTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey and Melanie have a new house...Tue Jul 20 1993 19:384
Yea, Vardell, Hoard Tillman Jones, all names that would strike fear 
into my heart if I were a defensive player...

=Bob=
61.62PFSVAX::JACOBFresh off a week of I &amp; ITue Jul 20 1993 19:508
    
    >>			BERNIE WILL BE PROTECTED!!!!!
    
    What, somebody give hime a case of Trojans?????
    
    
    JaKe
    
61.63QUASER::JACKSONTAYes,Calgon took her away!Tue Jul 20 1993 23:3211
      Hal, You woulda loved the interview with Bernie.  He almost broke
    down in tears!!!
    
      Here is an excuse for the browns stinking (if they still do):
    
     Mack retired and everyone was to emotionally distraught to play to
    their full potential.
    
      Your Welcome,
    
      Tim
61.64PFSVAX::JACOBFresh off a week of I &amp; IFri Jul 23 1993 20:049
    Hey, did Michael Dean Perry return today or is he still moping about
    something Belichick said to him after practice the other day?
    
    
    What, did Belichick tell him he could only have 11 helpings at the team
    dinner that night??
    
    JaKe
    
61.65BAD DAWG WANTS OUTESKIMO::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Mon Jul 26 1993 12:4511
    
    	The deal with Perry.......he doesn't like the defensive scheme of
    things......he want to be able to do what he wants on the line......
    go after the quarterback.  but, Bill wants him to stay put.  This has
    been a problem since the two have played together.  This is Perry's 
    final year on his contract and he has been getting fined $4,000 a day
    for not showing up.  Will he resign with the Browns for next year.....
    doubtfull.
    
    		WOOF!
    
61.66can't remember the score.....STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Aug 10 1993 15:0217
    
    	preseason game #1 vs Washington...
    
    	If this game showed anything at all, it was the Browns weakness....
    
    			the secondary!
    
    
    	Bernie looked lost.....
    	Vinnie looked good.....
    	Touchdown Tommy got two touchdowns and looked good.....
    	defensive line looked good.....
    	offensive line looked better.....
    	special teams.....SUCKED!
    
    
    		WOOF!
61.67USCTR1::KINGKey West, where the fun begins.......Tue Aug 10 1993 15:454
    41-12!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!a BLOW-OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    REK
61.68WAIT TILL REGULAR SEASONSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Aug 10 1993 17:265
    
    	No, No, No..........a freebee.
    
    
    	WOOF!	
61.69arf? arf?CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's gonna wear maternity clothes!Fri Aug 13 1993 13:398
    Oh Hal.....
    
    Any woids o' wisdom regarding tomorrow night's Patriot - Dawg game?
    
    I remain,
    seeing if dawgbones will get lodged?
    Kev
    
61.70Browns dominateSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Fri Aug 13 1993 13:5518


		                      ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                                    /            
                            /\^^^^^^
                            \_______________

             
	Yes Kev,
    		Don't bet on the Pats!  You will see a mainly Brown fan
    	attendance.  Should be interesting....
    
    
    		WOOF!
61.71CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's gonna wear maternity clothes!Fri Aug 13 1993 13:592
    nice graphics.......
    
61.72LAGUNA::MAY_BRsquished tomatoesFri Aug 13 1993 15:514
    
    It's a picture of Hal's last date.
    
    brews
61.73rollward!!!!!CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's gonna wear maternity clothes!Fri Aug 13 1993 16:045
    dammit brews, I just blew my lunch on my screen!
    
    ;^)
    
    
61.74Browns win one...STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Mon Aug 16 1993 11:3131


		                      ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                                    /            
                            /\^^^^^^
                            \_______________

             
	Browns take preseason game #2 from the Pats.....12-9.
    
    	Good running game by the Browns.
    
    	Excelent defensive line!
    
    	Better Safety coverage.
    
    	Bernie looked better.
    
    	Vinnie looked no better than Bernie.
    
    	Metcalf was great!
    
    	Score should have beaten the Pats by more but because of the 
    	offensive problem, getting the ball in the endzone...the score
    	was close.  The Browns dominated much of the game.
    
    	WOOF!
61.75METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Aug 16 1993 14:574
sounds like that game was one of the most boring games in NFL
history.

The Crazy Met
61.76I KNOW I'VE SEEN WORSE...STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Mon Aug 16 1993 19:3423


		                      ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                            Pats    /            
                            /\^^^^^^      @#&*@~
                            \_______________

             
    
    	Your right Crazy.....very borring.....not much exciting happened.
    
    	The guys I had over the house did cheer when Bernie got sacked...
    	to them, that was excitement.  To me, its nothing new.  Ya get
    	used to it.  Then again...when your watching 3 and 4 and 5th string
    	players....what do you really expect?
    
    
    	WOOF!

61.77PFSVAX::JACOBMon Aug 16 1993 19:3814
    
    >>	used to it.  Then again...when your watching 3 and 4 and 5th string
    >>	players....what do you really expect?
    
    Sheeeeeeeeeiiit,
    
    Up ther in  Clevescum, all season long all they get to watch playing
    fer the Brown(spot)s(tm) are 3rd, 4th, and 5th string players, compared
    to everybody else's team!
    
    (8^0
    
    JaKe
    
61.78PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 17 1993 15:502
    After the game the Pats and Browns swapped players.  The Browns got a
    linebacker in exchange for a nose tackle.
61.79IS THAT RIGHT...ESKIMO::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Aug 17 1993 16:3816


		                      ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                   >>>>>>>>>>Jake   /                      ____
                            /\^^^^^^      Fake>>>>>>>>    /    \
                            \_______________              |JAKE|  PEEEYOU!
                                                          \____/
             

    Jake, we will see who gets the last laugh this year.....I hear that the
    squeelers can't figure out who to start at QB.....O'Donald or the     
    Cleveland cast off.......4th stringer...this year....
61.80MKFSB::LONGAll gave some, some gave allTue Aug 17 1993 17:316
	Some absorootry mind boggling graphics there, Hal!  I like it 
	better when you just enter words that don't make any sense.



	billl
61.81QUASER::JACKSONTAReal mans sport is starting!Wed Aug 18 1993 16:141
       billl,  are you telling us you don't know what arf arf means?:~))
61.82MKFSB::LONGAll gave some, some gave allWed Aug 18 1993 16:428
 >>      billl,  are you telling us you don't know what arf arf means?:~))

	sure that's the sound of an ankle-biting, annoying resemblance
	of a dog.  Now WOOF WOOF, that's an entirly different story.
	But then again, I don't want to get REK all cranked up again.


	billl
61.83Browns 27 - Cats 14STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Sep 07 1993 13:5130
		                      ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                      Bengals>>>>>>>/            
                            /\^^^^^^     >>>>>>>pussy cats
                            \_______________

    
    	The Dawgs did it!  Game one is a win!  Awsome Defense!
    
    	Bernie did a good job and should have had better stats if it wasn't
    	for a couple of dropped passes...big ones too.
    
    	Touchdown Tommy got his first Pro TD.  A one yard run at the end of
    	the first half.  He looked good!  Something like 69 yards on the
    	day.
    
    	Michael Jackson changed his name to Dyson and got 1 TD for the day.
    
    	The DAWG defense scored 6 sacks, 2 INT's and one fumble recovery
    	for a BIG TD.  Only allowed 52 yards rushing on the day...most
    	comming in the 1st quarter.  This defense is just totally down
    	right GREAT!  
    
    	Don't be surprised to see the Browns beat the 49ers on Monday.
             

    		WOOF!
61.84MKFSB::LONGAll gave some, some gave allTue Sep 07 1993 15:1710
>>    	Touchdown Tommy got his first Pro TD.  A one yard run at the end of
>>    	the first half.  He looked good!  Something like 69 yards on the
>>    	day.

	Don't know who "Touchdown Tommy" is, but the guy who scored the one
	yard TD at the end of the half was Vardell, who, according to my paper,
	gained 2 yards on 2 carries.  Another HALism????


	billl
61.85a Great Defense???? Think againPFSVAX::JACOBOh, Woe is me!!!Tue Sep 07 1993 15:4619
    
    >>	The DAWG defense scored 6 sacks, 2 INT's and one fumble recovery
    >>	for a BIG TD.  Only allowed 52 yards rushing on the day...most
    >>	comming in the 1st quarter.  This defense is just totally down
    >>	right GREAT!  
    
    Yeah, sure HAL, right.  Lessee how they do nexted week .vs. the 49ers,
    then you might change yer tune.
    
    That was the Lowly Bungholes the Brown(spot)s(tm) played this week, not
    a REAL contender, or even a decent football team.
    
    The STEELERS lost Sunday, but the defense rated about a B.  The offense
    again rated about a D+.  They gave the 49ers excellent field position
    too damned myuch in the firsted half, and dug themselves a hole they
    couldn't get out of.
    
    JaKe
    
61.86SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsTue Sep 07 1993 15:494
    
    RE.84
    
    What paper do you get, the sports edition of "My WEEKLY READER"????
61.87PFSVAX::JACOBOh, Woe is me!!!Tue Sep 07 1993 15:514
    Vardell had 60 yards on 16 carries.
    
    JaKe
    
61.88Spots on top 'o divisionOURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen 592-5249Tue Sep 07 1993 16:327
Amazing 

Cleveland       1-0
Pittsburgh      0-1 "Clemson refs"
Houston         0-1
Cinncinatti     0-1

61.8938728::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Tue Sep 07 1993 16:392
 Jake, TOMZAK is to BLAM!!!!!!!!!!!<
61.90ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Sep 07 1993 18:4820
61.91PFSVAX::JACOBTue Sep 07 1993 20:2610
    re-.1
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    
    Funniest note in here in a long time.
    
    'Spots win their first, then go 5-10 the rest fo the season.
    
    JaKe
    
61.92PFSVAX::JACOBTue Sep 07 1993 20:3713
    
    >>	Michael Jackson changed his name to Dyson and got 1 TD for the day.
    
    Why, is he afraid that the kid accusing the OTHER Michael Jackson will
    realize he's got the wrong one and finger him???
    
    Or does he want his name to sound like his role model, Mike TYSON????
    
    
    Inquiring mindless and all that sh_t
    
    JaKe
    
61.93CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 07 1993 20:384
On a serious note, why did he change his name to Dyson?


'Saw
61.94ROYALT::ASHEHey... what's going on?Tue Sep 07 1993 20:432
    "In tribute to his dad" is what I heard...
    
61.95PFSVAX::JACOBTue Sep 07 1993 20:455
    SOunds like a load of BS to me, with the recent developments of the
    one-gloved wonder.
    
    JaKe
    
61.96CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 07 1993 20:477
>    "In tribute to his dad" is what I heard...

I can understand that.....

'Saw
    

61.97QUASER::JACKSONTAReal mans sport is starting!Tue Sep 07 1993 20:513
      Is Hal in the Iceman's account?
    
       Tim
61.98DYSONSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed Sep 08 1993 11:4429
    
    	Michael was mandated by the NFL to change his number or face
    $10,000.00 a game fine so he changed his number from #1 to 81.
    
    	Evidently Michael's mom and dad were not married when michael
    was born.  They were married shortly thereafter but Michael never
    had his name changed.  He changed his name for his dad.  To make
    him proud of him.  
    
    	ICEMAN.....definately an imposter!  
    
    	I will now make a prediction.........The Browns will make it to
    the playoffs with either a 9-7 wild card birth or a 10-6 Central
    Division Title.   Why???  the H-factor!
    
    	Clay Mathews received a standing ovation when the names of the 
    defensive players were announced at the beginning of the game Sunday.
    
    	Once again...I just have to say it...Great Defense last Sunday!
    
    	1st and goal from the one...and...the Dawgs...stop the Bengals
    on four straight plays!  Outstanding!  We all went crazy!
    
    	Another great moment....4th and one from the one with 18 seconds
    left on the clock before half.  Bring in the big men.........Tommy
    Vardel...Touchdown!  All this infront of the DAWG POUND.
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.99CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Wed Sep 08 1993 13:1523
>    	Michael was mandated by the NFL to change his number or face
>    $10,000.00 a game fine so he changed his number from #1 to 81.

Did he come into the league after they imposed that number rule?

I thought if you had a number that was "out of position" before that
rule, it got "grandfathered"....


    
>    	Clay Mathews received a standing ovation when the names of the 
>    defensive players were announced at the beginning of the game Sunday.

Clay Mathews is COOL.



Did Pepper play at all?  Or did he sit out because he hasn't learned the
system yet?



'Saw
61.100and dat's da troof!CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's gonna wear maternity clothes!Wed Sep 08 1993 13:2012
    >> Did Pepper play at all?
    
    Naw, she's still scouring Hotlanta for her one true ACC_Chris, then
    she'll play......
    
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    missin dan'l too
    Kev
    
61.101Pepper & MackSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed Sep 08 1993 14:0010
    
    	Pepper Johnson played on special teams only.  He will more than
    likely play on defense this week against the 49ers.  He will only
    improve an already great front 7!
    
    	The word in Cleveland is that Keven Mack wants to come back and
    play for the Browns.  Art and the Browns arn't sure what they are going
    to do.  
    
    	WOOF!
61.102He's a boxer!QUASER::JACKSONTAReal mans sport is starting!Wed Sep 08 1993 15:325
      Mack to come back and play again,  after that tearful goodbye he had
    with the "boys".....  Did this guy already coke up his $$$ or what?
    Maybe thats why he quit in the 1st place.
    
      Tim
61.103Hopefully...Mack won't be back.STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed Sep 08 1993 16:2413
    
    	To be honest, I feel that keven Mack should stay retired and
    Touchdown Tommy do the work.  Just think, if Vardell would have played
    more last year, he would have been just that much better this year.
    I say let TT have the job.  Its not just that either....if the Browns
    pick Mack back up...they have to drop an up and comming rb like
    Baldwin.  I say no!  Keven did a great job when in his prime and I'll
    give him credit for that...but this retire/unretire crap has got to
    stop...not only in the NFL but in the NBA as well.
    
    	WOOF!
    
    	DAWGS TO EAT UP THE FOURTY-NINERS AT THE DAWG POUND!
61.104SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsWed Sep 08 1993 18:104
    
    As one of 600 Bay Area Brown Backers I hope the Browns beat the 
    niners bad. People here have chased me around the office wanting a
    piece of my wallet. I also want to see the niners bandwagon unload.
61.105DEFENSE! DEFENSE! DEFENSE! thats how its done!STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Thu Sep 09 1993 11:5812
    
    	Hey dude.....Bay Area Brown Backers....???
    
    	I'm going to be in San Jose, not this weekend but the two weekends
    thereafter.  Are the Backers going down to LA for the game against the
    Raiders???  Please let me know.  I was thinking of pickig up a plane
    from SF for the game on Sunday.  Or, where do the backers meet for the 
    games?  I'll need directions or a phone number to call.
                                              
    		Thanks in advance!
    
    			Hal
61.106helpful adviceCSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's gonna wear maternity clothes!Thu Sep 09 1993 12:2413
    
    Hey Ron!  (It's Ron, isn't it?)  ;^)
    
    Yabbut if ya try to call Hal, please remember to dial real S L O W !
    
    (It makes it easier for him to deal with reality)
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    a former terrorist of da valley myself!
    Kev
    
61.107ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Sep 09 1993 15:2240
61.108There was a ton of 'emCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Sep 09 1993 15:307
    -1,
    Do the Brownies still meet at "Four's" Bar near North Station?
    They did a few years back.
    
    
    MikeL
    
61.109CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Thu Sep 09 1993 15:3211
>    Do the Brownies still meet at "Four's" Bar near North Station?
>    They did a few years back.
    
I thought Brownies were too young to drink.      


Oh, oh, you mean the Back Bay Brown's fans!


'Saw

61.110SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsThu Sep 09 1993 16:2813
    
    re.105
    
    The Bay Area Brown Backer are going to Seattle this year not L.A.
    (who would want to go to L.A. on purpose anyway???) The viewing
    site I go to is San Jose Live , this is a sports bar in the Downtown
    area. The Bay Area Backers get there own section and the number  is
    408-291-2222. You coming out for training vacation or other????
    
    
    Send mail for more info
    
    Ron
61.111ROYALT::ASHEVP Secret Service codename -ButtafuocoThu Sep 09 1993 17:002
    I thought Fours was now Bills territory...
    
61.112PFSVAX::JACOBThu Sep 09 1993 19:409
    LAtest trade rumor:
    
    
    Gronowski to IBM fer 2 power cords and a broken down keypunch.
    
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.113Mack to be backHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyThu Sep 09 1993 19:455
Kevin Mack will be rejoining the Browns. He's expected to rejoin the 53
man roster by the end of the month. No announcement was made about when
he might be on the active roster.

TTom
61.114PFSVAX::JACOBthe ice bucket is full, melting fastThu Sep 09 1993 19:558
    re.113
    
    I guess they need somebody to put down the white lines at Clevescum
    Dump...er Municipal Stadium.....er, sorry, Mack's famous fer taking UP
    white lines.  I got cornfused.
    
    JaKe
    
61.115ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Sep 09 1993 20:014
61.116PFSVAX::JACOBthe ice bucket is full, melting fastThu Sep 09 1993 20:0312
    
    >><<< Note 61.115 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

    
    >>re: .112
    
    >>Trade rumor is false, IBM could not offer enough cash.
    
    Translation:  they wouldn't go above $10.
    
    JaKe
    
61.117QUASER::JACKSONTAReal mans sport is starting!Thu Sep 09 1993 20:326
      San Jose Live?  Watch out for them fruit (preserves) shots Hal.
    Mixing those with Scotch on the rocks is deadly.  Be sure you ask the
    waitress if her finger is clean!  Do one of them shots and you'll know
    why I said that.
    
      Tim
61.118AARRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!QUASER::HUNTERHow Do You Spell Win... G L Y NThu Sep 09 1993 22:2315
    
     Now I know why I almost didn't come back this year...
    
     
    
    	The
    
    	Groaner
    
    	Is
    
    	Bothersome
    
    
    BG
61.119Browns 24 - 49ers 13ESKIMO::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Mon Sep 13 1993 16:5514
    
    	Well guys, I won't be in tomorrow to brag about my Cleveland
    Browns.
    
    	I just want to let you all know.  I'll be in CA for the next 
    2.5 weeks and won't be returning till Oct 4th.
    
    	Later
    
    
    	Go DAWGS!!!
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.120ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Sep 13 1993 19:2721
61.121Setting the table for...ROCK::MURPHYIllini in '93Mon Sep 13 1993 21:027
    This year is already starting to look like 86, 87, and 89, isn't it
    Paul? Even with Danny Boy and Schottenheimer gone, the principals are
    the same. Maybe with Wade in, the Broncs can win an extra one.
    
    FWIW
    
    Murph
61.122PTOVAX::JACOBAnother day in the VolcanoMon Sep 13 1993 21:5216
    Brown(spot)s(tm) .vs. 49ers tonite in the Mistake by the Lake,
    Clevescum, the world's only inhabitated raw sewage dump.  Playing on
    the painted green surface of the CLevescum Municipal Sludge Dump.
    
    Bernice will unveil a new brown/orange pair of Pumps, with a nice
    chiffon playing skirt, and strapless top.
    
    Gawd I love working second shift.
    
    BTW, have the Dorks in the Pig Pound at the one end zone planned by
    bringing batteries, coolers wif snow balls saved from last winter, etc.
    for when the 49ers are entering the end zone for the 45th time in the
    game???
    
    JaKe
    
61.123ROYALT::ASHEWE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R.Tue Sep 14 1993 02:352
    Browns up 20-13 at the half...
    
61.124ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Sep 14 1993 11:4221
61.12538728::HUBERFile and ForgetTue Sep 14 1993 12:4815
    
    A fun game to watch, that's for sure...
    
    I'm still worried about the secondary, though.  The O-line has
    improved, but still looked shaky as well.  I would have liked to
    have seen more of the running game, as well...
    
    On the other hand, the performance of the special teams was a very
    pleasant surprise, and I liked the look of the D-line.
    
    All in all, the Browns are about where I expected them to be - in line
    for a playoff berth, but with enough holes left to prevent serious
    contention for a Super Bowl victory.
    
    Joe
61.126QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Tue Sep 14 1993 13:5214
      The Browns still need OL help.  Bernie was hit at least 15-20 times
    after throwing the ball.
    
      The MNF dweebs did make a funny, and that was when Kosar "ran" (used
    loosely) due to presure, and they started commenting on who he looked
    like when he was galloping around,  and the last persons name escapes
    me right now,  but I know it was a womens name.   Thought of JaKe,
    wondering just what he would say in here about that comment,  but JaKe,
    I guess you won't get to since you were working;-(
    
      I was rollin' anyway.  Got a strange look from the wife...
    
    
      Tim
61.127Jackson or Dyson ???MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 14 1993 13:577
    Ok what's going on here, someone told me Michael Jackson scored a TD
    last night, is that true ? and if so I thought he was Michael Dyson
    now, did he change his name, change it back, whats the story.  Couldnt
    they afford to print him a new shirt :-)
    
    Thanks in advance..
    								MaB
61.128????????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo.3 looms over Fenway.....Tue Sep 14 1993 14:208
    
    
         Michael Jackson has changed his name back again to Michael Jackson
    because of the "overwhelming" amount of mail he has received saying
    that the kids really look up to him as MJ.
    
    
    Chappy
61.129CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 14 1993 14:328
>    
>         Michael Jackson has changed his name back again to Michael Jackson
>    because of the "overwhelming" amount of mail he has received saying
>    that the kids really look up to him as MJ.
    

That's funny.  8^)

61.130and what position does Michael Jackson play in?FRETZ::HEISERnotes from the lost civilizationTue Sep 14 1993 16:201
    
61.131prone???? Kneeling????CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesTue Sep 14 1993 16:361
    
61.132CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 14 1993 16:4110
>                          -< prone????  Kneeling???? >-
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

He plays for the Browns, he doesn't work for DEC, (oh, uh, er, excuse me,
Digital.....)


'Saw
    

61.133Thanks in advanceMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 14 1993 16:545
    Can someone give me Metcalf's stats from last night, rushing/Receptions
    and return Yrds.. Thanks in advance.. (paperless, NO MNF Stats for
    metcalf)
    
    							MaB
61.13412-71;4-23HBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyTue Sep 14 1993 17:065
Metcalf had 12 rushes for 71 yards, caught 4 passes for 23 yards. That's
from the USA Today. I can't tell - and didn't watch all - if'n Metcalf
returned any kicks.

TTom
61.135(8^)PFSVAX::JACOBOh DOUBLE Woe is Me!!!Tue Sep 14 1993 20:1313
    
    >>Ok what's going on here, someone told me Michael Jackson scored a TD
    >>last night, is that true ? and if so I thought he was Michael Dyson
    
    Ok, Michael Jackson the Brown(spot) scored a TD lasted night, Michael
    Jackson the gloved one may have scored a young Moscovite lasted night,
    and Mike Tyson is rumored to have scored in prison lasted night with
    Bubba.
    
    Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
    
    JaKe
    
61.136MSE1::FRANCUSNY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTYTue Sep 14 1993 20:166
    JaKe,
    
    do we get a triple woe next week??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.137PFSVAX::JACOBOh DOUBLE Woe is Me!!!Tue Sep 14 1993 20:1910
    re.136
    I sure as hell hope not, but the way the offense is looking, this game
    could go 5 qtrs and end up 0-0, given the Bungholes scoring power.
    
    I gots to hope fer the defense to score a few this coming week.
    
    (8^(
    
    JaKe
    
61.138ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Sep 20 1993 11:5850
61.139Dawgs be barkingSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOMon Sep 20 1993 12:399
Isn't there a leash law around here?  ;^)

I hate to admit it, but the Dawgs be fun to watch this year.  Touchdown
Tommy Vardells run was a thing of beauty.  Plus the winning TD was a real
gut call that was pulled off flawlessly.  

I cain't believe I'm saying nice things about Cleveland!

zamboni
61.140MSBCS::COULOMBEMon Sep 20 1993 14:244
    That was a great Football game ... With Metcalf coming to life in the
    4th qtr. and Vinny Testaverde replacing Kosar, just a great finish.
    
     
61.141CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Mon Sep 20 1993 15:056
    I watched most of that darned game and didn't know the DAWGS won till
    just now...
    
    Boy, am I bummed.
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
61.142SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsMon Sep 20 1993 16:053
    
    Hal is out here in San Jose I think, if he calls I will give has access
    to the net.
61.143LAGUNA::MAY_BRMEts in (last in) 94Mon Sep 20 1993 16:192
    
    Thanks for the favor.  8^(
61.144SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsMon Sep 20 1993 16:484
    
    
    No problem just tryin to help.
    
61.145(8^)PFSVAX::JACOBNo, I wanna be Frank this time!Mon Sep 20 1993 17:589
    Bernice sucked, bernice broke a heel on his new high heels, and went
    and left the other pair at the hotel, so they put Vinny Testicleverdy
    in, he shows Clevescum what a REAL QB is, not this wuss Kosar, and
    leads them to a win.
    
    Sucks, truly sucks,
    
    JaKe
    
61.146SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsMon Sep 20 1993 18:262
    
    Sounds like sour grapes to me.
61.147ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Sep 20 1993 20:549
61.148SCHELL::francuspo' po' ChappyMon Sep 27 1993 12:423
Gronowski and Hal watch day 1. (Hal might still be in CA)

The Crazy Met
61.14938728::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Sep 27 1993 12:4515
    
    Had to happen sometime...
    
    After two straight "big games", the Colts take advantage of the
    Browns' weak areas (particularly the OL) and walk away with the
    win.  Kosar again has problems given no time to pass, and
    Testaverde's additional mobility isn't enough to pull off the
    win.
    
    Hopefully the OL will take advantage of the off week to work out
    the kinks.
    
    At least the Oilers and Bengals lost...
    
    Joe
61.150:-)16134::CHAPALONIS_MThe Crazy Met is a WELCHERMon Sep 27 1993 13:0612
    
    
    Hey
    
    
    
                 woof!
    
    
    
    
             Chappy (for Hal and Paul)
61.151SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsMon Sep 27 1993 15:095
    I told Hal to call me if he wanted access to the net, he hasn't done it
    yet. He must be enjoying our fall weather out here, gonna be 90 today.
    
    	
    Ron
61.152PFSVAX::JACOBBeavis and 'Dickhead'????????????Mon Sep 27 1993 19:296
    Bernice should find a new supplier fer tham high heels, that's two
    games in a row wif a broken heel and having to be benched after the
    first half because of it.
    
    JaKe
    
61.153ELMAGO::BENBACAI don't need no stinking Package!Mon Sep 27 1993 22:371
    Vinny Greenballs weren't much better
61.154ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Sep 28 1993 20:3233
61.155SKEWED::MCKAYWed Sep 29 1993 16:004
    Iceman, what's the deal with the form feeds?  Enquiring minds and all
    that...
    
    Jimbo
61.156AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSWed Sep 29 1993 16:134
    Jimbo I'm with ya.  I kinda want to read what Hal has to say about the
    Browns, but his form feeds are making me hit the next unread button.
    
    John "D cowboys" R.
61.157Ain't bad....3-1 after 4STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Mon Oct 04 1993 17:2337




			          ____/\
                                 /-    |
                        /-------/      |
	                \/\/\/\/|      \
                                /            
                        /\^^^^^^
			\_______________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    	Sorry there Ron, but, I forgot your phone number.  At any rate,
    	I did make it to San Jose Live for both of the games.  
    
    	The Raider game was great...the Colt game...well.....
    
    	It was kind of funny after the Raiders lost....all us dawg fans
    	just went crazy...like a bunch of kids...running around barking!
    
    	The Browns still kind of scare me though...I'd like to see some
    	real offense at the beginning of the game.  
    
    	I really think the Colts were kind of lucky in that game too.  The
    	officiating stank!!!  The Browns didn't look up for the game
    	either.  The Colts seem to have the Browns number.  
    
    	A week off should help the Browns in their upcomming battle with
    	Miami!  I look for the Browns to squeek out a victory next Sunday.
    
    	How about the defense beating up on QB's???  What a defense!!!
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.158AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSMon Oct 04 1993 19:093
    Thanks for writing a note that we can read.
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
61.159Quite an image in my mindMPO::MPO12::MCFALLI needed 1 more fare to make my nightTue Oct 05 1993 13:278
>   	It was kind of funny after the Raiders lost....all us dawg fans
>    	just went crazy...like a bunch of kids...running around barking!


	Hal, I;ve never seen a bunch of kids running around barking - where
did you grow up - Romulus and Remus territory?  :^)

	Jim M.
61.160ROYALT::ASHELet's pretend we're married..Mon Oct 11 1993 12:353
    Browns lose...
    
    Time to go back and report more Kimball results...
61.161OW MY ACHILLESWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNumber 3 Looms over FenwayMon Oct 11 1993 12:5113
    
    
    
    WOOF!!!!!!!!
    
    
    15-1
    
    
    
    NOT!!!!!!!!
    
    CHAPPY
61.162PFSVAX::JACOBUmgwana Cik BuudieMon Oct 11 1993 19:5816
    HALwatch Day 1!!!!
    
    GROANERwatch day 1!!!
    
    Brown(spot)s(tm) lose, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, now 3-2 and tied fer
    the lead in the AFC Central wif the STEELERS.  Showdown in 2 weeks.
    
    STEELERS on the way up, 'Spots on the way down.
    
    Lessee, what's the predickshun now fer the Clevescum teem, Groaner,
    5-11, 7-9?????
    
    HAHAHAHA
    
    JaKe
    
61.163CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Oct 12 1993 12:3911
The thing I'm finding a little humorous is that the $27 Million Dollar
Man is now on the the bench.

Testaverde (Green Head?) is gonna lead them to the promised land....
Yeah, right....


Be interesting to see what happens....


'Saw
61.164LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesTue Oct 12 1993 15:117
    I think that should be green balls, 'saw.
    
    And we should all be thankful that while the Browns went on their minor
    win streak, Hal was out of town.  We should give them a coulple day
    leeway just on that.
    
    brews
61.165CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Oct 12 1993 15:219
>
>    I think that should be green balls, 'saw.
>    

For some reason I thought testa was Italian for "head", but I'm probably
wrong.....


'Saw
61.166METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Oct 12 1993 15:393
Hal and Groaner watch: Day 2.

The Crazy Met
61.167Wheres all the wooofing, other than lunch!QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Tue Oct 12 1993 20:3010
      REplacing Bernie when he went something like 15 for 19 and 3 sacks?
    
      Sacking is his OL and immobility.  Tessti didn't do any better.
    
      The head coach is doing the old jints don't know which qb to play
    routine....
    
      I love it!
    
      Tim
61.168ROYALT::ASHEDon't play dat song, dat Achybreaky songTue Oct 12 1993 20:382
    He was 15 for 19 but under 100 yards... What's the point if it's around
    5 yards per attempt?
61.169QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Tue Oct 12 1993 22:5610
      re-1
    
      Doesn't that boil down to play calling, no time to throw and bad pass
    routes?  I'm assuming that Bernnie don't call his own plays.  Testie
    won't help.
    
      Not that it matters, 'cause I'm no spot fan, but typically you don't
    bench a high % passer.
    
      Tim
61.170PTOVAX::JACOBBaldHead=SolarPanel 4 A SexMachineWed Oct 13 1993 00:036
    I though I heard somewhere where  Bernice was calling his own plays
    this year.  Oh well, won't be calling anything but fer a pizza on
    Sunday, huh??
    
    JaKe
    
61.171CNTROL::HUBERFile and ForgetWed Oct 13 1993 11:3911
    
    Word in Cleveland is that Kosar called his own plays weeks 1 & 2, and
    then Bellichek insisted upon taking over from week 3-present, with
    the possible exception of the first drive vs. Miami.
    
    Whatever hopes the first two weeks provided have been crushed.  The
    Browns need an offensive coordinator desperately, but Bellichek
    doesn't seem willing to admit this.  With Vinny at the wheels, I
    think we're about to see the Bengals first win of the year... B^P
    
    Joe
61.172METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 13 1993 12:323
Hal and Groaner watch day 3.

The Crazy Met
61.173LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesWed Oct 13 1993 14:204
    
    Cleveland has all those coaches and no OC?  What do them guys do there?
    
    brews
61.174QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Wed Oct 13 1993 15:533
      re-1
    
      The same as alot of big company managers,  nothing!
61.175PFSVAX::JACOBa 1993=The year of BAD OFFICIATINGWed Oct 13 1993 19:0431
    
 >> <<< Note 61.173 by LAGUNA::MAY_BR "Ain't no cure for the overseed blues" >>>

    
 >>   Cleveland has all those coaches and no OC?  What do them guys do there?
    
    Lessee, they gots some of the following coaches, and these are just a
    few:
    
    Head coach--the one with the dirty knees
    Line coach--lines all players up after a bad game for their spanking
    Back coach--rubs the players backs and spews soothing words after they
    		lose
    Special teams coach--lines up the team to get warm-up games against
    		special teams like the cleveland home for the Criminally
    		infirmed, and the Cleveland School for the Brain Dead.
    Position Coach--his job is to make sure the players jock straps are in
    		the proper position, and their cup is installed(Bernice
    		applied for this position and wanted to be a "player-coach" 
    		but was turned down.
    
    And the list goes on and on.
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
    
    
61.176METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Oct 14 1993 18:074
Hal and Groaner watch day 4. And Groaner was in ::baseball at around 22:30
lasted night.

The Crazy Met
61.177PTOVAX::JACOBWhat the hell is a 'hootchie-kootchie'Sat Oct 16 1993 02:0914
    Hal and Groaner watch day 5.  Talk about fair weather fans.
    
    Team goes south, GROANER distappears and Hal is not to be found on the
    face of the earth, either.
    
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
    
    What hypocrites.
    
    (8^)
    
    JaKe
    
61.178MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Sun Oct 17 1993 02:224
    Hal and Groaner watch day 6.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.179MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Sun Oct 17 1993 16:374
    Hal and Groaner watch, one full WEEK.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.180PFSVAX::JACOBa 1993=The year of BAD OFFICIATINGMon Oct 18 1993 09:518
    re-.1
    
    Oh, the Mistakes by the Lake won yesterday, so they'll be in here in
    full force today, gushing like all hell, and no mention will be made of
    their mysterious abscences fer the lasted week.
    
    JaKe
    
61.181CNTROL::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Oct 18 1993 11:308
    
    Yuck.  All yesterday's win against Cincy did was to show just how bad
    a team the Bengals are...
    
    The Browns don't have a chance against Pittsburgh with Vinny at the
    helm - which seems inevitable.  B^(
    
    Joe
61.182METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Oct 18 1993 12:543
wow JaKe, you were in here almost as early as Karen.

The Crazy Met
61.183MIA bracelets for the both of DemWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNumber 3 Looms over FenwayMon Oct 18 1993 13:065
    
    Woof
    
    
    Where are dem guys???
61.184ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 22 1993 13:4021
61.185ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 22 1993 13:418
61.186MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Oct 22 1993 14:345
    yeah, but you were in ::baseball that week and always seem
    to show up when the Browns win.
    
    The Crazy met
    
61.187Watch dem operativesQUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Fri Oct 22 1993 15:005
     TCM,  he said entered a note.  They/him do RON when things go bad.
    
      HtH,
    
      Tim
61.188MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Oct 22 1993 15:586
    re: .187
    
    I know exactly what he said.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.189PFSVAX::JACOBTouch the beard, I'll break yer arm!Fri Oct 22 1993 18:456
    re.185
    
    Trying the old reverse KoD trick, eh Groaner??
    
    JaKe
    
61.190ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 22 1993 19:2911
61.191CSC32::GAULKEFri Oct 22 1993 20:019
    
    
    >>  What reverse KoD trick? 
    
    
       You know, where you put your head between your legs and 
    kiss your a$$ goodbye.
    
    
61.192CNTROL::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Oct 25 1993 10:5712
    
    Well, Sunday's game was yet another example of how on any given Sunday
    Eric Metcalf can beat any team.  If he just did it more than once per
    year, he'd really be worth something.
    
    Other than Metcalf, the only good news for the Browns was that
    Testaverde had a good day.  Even with Metcalf providing his heroics,
    a normal performance by Testaverde would have killed the Browns.
    
    A victory is a victory, I guess...
    
    Joe
61.193PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 25 1993 12:305
61.194somethin' about that PoundCNTROL::CHILDSthems that die are the lucky onesMon Oct 25 1993 12:327
easy Mac, he didn't throw any inties. Any game Vinny doesn't throw an
inty is a plus. Just like BBJ.....

not like the Steelers to loose it on Special Teams.....

;^)
61.195PFSVAX::JACOBTouch the beard, I'll break yer arm!Mon Oct 25 1993 12:375
    Mac, TEsticleVerde got sandwiched between Reggie Barnes and Kevin
    Greene and got his shoulder hurted.
    
    JaKe
    
61.196CNTROL::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Oct 25 1993 13:214
    
    Testaverde's out 2-4 weeks with a seperated shoulder.
    
    Joe
61.197SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsMon Oct 25 1993 16:032
    
    As a browns fan I think this is good. BRING BACK KOSAR
61.198CNTROL::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Oct 25 1993 19:167
    
    Word now is that Testaverde is out for the season.  You know, if
    Bellichek will give Kosar some leeway to call his own plays rather
    than this constant "Metcalf up the Middle" junk, the Browns might
    actually have a chance of doing something interesting this year.
    
    Joe
61.199(8^)PFSVAX::JACOBAll the Babes that'll be thereMon Oct 25 1993 19:187
    The Testaverde sandwich that Barnes and Greene made was one mean
    collision, that's fer sure.
    
    Couldn'ta happened to a pukier team, IMHO.
    
    JaKe
    
61.200SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsMon Oct 25 1993 19:503
    
    Well that sandwich may have helped the Browns, I'd much rather have him
    at Q.B. Now if we could just get an O-line.   
61.201USCTR1::KINGLook, I can hear what you are thinking.....Tue Oct 26 1993 11:173
    Testy is out for the year with a separated shoulder.....
    
    REK
61.202QUASER::HUNTERHow Do You Spell Win... G L Y NTue Oct 26 1993 18:208
     Ah yes...  We'll get to view Bernice in his new dress
    for the rest of the season.  I'll ventrue to predict that 
    Bernice only lasts another 2 games at which point the Clowns
    will begin their annual trip to the cellar of the AFC Central.
    Only to meet the happless Donks at the bottom heep for the season
    
    BG
    
61.203Bernie Kosar is our man!STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Fri Oct 29 1993 15:0544
    
    	WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF
    
    
    	Yes, I'm back!!!
    
    	Boy, you guys are bad.......beating me up when I'm not even here!
    
    	I've been in CA for the last two weeks which is the reason I
    haven't been in this note........do you really think I would miss
    beating up on Jake the Fake???  No way!
    
    	The Browns are back in 1st and in the drivers seat again!  Sure
    wish I could have been at that game.  They must have gone crazy!  The
    Squeelers suck worms.  HaHaHaHaHa!  
    
    	Glad to see Vinnie go down.  I would much rather have Bernie in
    control.  Bill B. better get his act together!  Doesn't look like he
    gets along with many of his players.  How much will Art take???  If
    the Browns make to the playoffs this year...he take it all.  If they
    don't......don't be surprised at what might happen.  This is Bernie's
    team.  Bill blew it in the game against Miami......to bitch at Bernie
    after the TD pass just because Bernie changed the play.  Bill, chill
    out!  This is the big problem in Cleveland....Bill wants to call the 
    play and doesn't want Bernie to change it.  Let Bernie do his thing.
    
    	The Browns aquired Brad Gobal...QB as backup.  Browns let David
    Brandon go.....  another one bites the dust....he didn't along with
    Bill either.  Don't expect Brandon to be out of work long.
    
    	Hey Jake.........better get used to 2nd place...maybe even 3rd.
    The Browns are on a roll.  Consider yourself lucky that O'Donell got
    out of the pound.....alive!
    
    	In every game the Browns have played except last weeks....the Dawgs
    have torn apart the opposing QB's.  Not a nice thing to know before
    Cleveland comes to town.
    
    	Next up.....DENVER.....may Eitherway's fate be the same as the 
    others.  
    
    	GO DAWGS!
    
    		WOOF!
61.204Cleveland almost looks good... (in the standings at lest)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 29 1993 17:3022
    The dogs have done ok, but dont count houston out just yet, they should
    win there next 2 so come Nov 21 Cleveland and Houston will be playing
    for the lead in the division (Im assuming Denver beats cleveland :-) ).
    So a houston wins puts Houston and Clevelnad at 6-4 with the Tie Break
    going to houston, where will Pittsburg be, theyll be at Denver hoping
    to move to 6-4.  This is the most wide open division right now, and Id
    say Cleve/Hou/Pitt all have a shot, Im going to guess cinncy is out of
    the hunt for the aft cent :-).  This was definatly a hugh win for
    cleveland, a win with 2 Punt returns for TD's is almost no exsistent
    in the nfl, but cleveland pulled one off here, and its going to keep
    them right in the hunt.  
    
    Id say cleveland is more of a threat now that the QB controversy is
    over, this will give kosar more time to think about the game and less
    time worrying about when he's going to get pulled.  If anything Detroit
    should have tought the league that you cant swith your qb's around
    every week and expect to win.
    
    Funny I was out on vacation one week when the bulls lost a few games
    and I was absoulutly chastised and I didnt even have a term available
    to me :-)
    								MaB
61.205PFSVAX::JACOBLet mine be a voice for peaceFri Oct 29 1993 20:368
    Come December, Clevescum will fade off into oblivion, having brought
    Brian Sipe out of retirement because their O-line won't protect QB's
    anymore.
    
    Hal, see me offline about a p_name wager.
    
    JaKe
    
61.206QUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Wed Nov 03 1993 14:1518
      Hal,  Are you sure its the spots defense that is causing QB's to go
    down, or just the painted sand?
    
      Marino went down because 6" of sand gave way when he was trying to
    plant his foot to throw the ball.
    
      I think  the NFL should fine modell or clevlend until they put in
    real grass or the fake crap.  At least the injury rate wouldn't be so
    high.
    
      Speaking of high,  I saw a commercial with Joe Thiesman sitting in
    the pound with some that was a lune wif a dog bone in his mouth.  Does
    this portray Clevland fans in general?
    
      This will be close game with clevland losing.  The spots won't have a
    good enough running game to keep up.
    
      Tim
61.207BROWNS 24 - BRONCOS 14ESKIMO::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed Nov 03 1993 15:2829
    
    	Out of all the games this year, O'Donnel was the only QB to come
    out with no injury.  Marino's injury may have been caused because of
    the newly layed grass over the infield.  Next year there won't be a
    problem with the Indians getting their own stadium.  The grass should
    take over the summer with no problem.  Model plans on bringing in the 
    stands along the sidelines for next year.  I'm sure there will be lots
    of improvement over the next few years since the Indians won't be
    there.
    	Now, reguarding the pound:  Everyone wishes they could be a *real*
    Dawg!  USA Today rates the Crush and Rush #3 in the AFC.  Surely the
    stats will be better after this weeks game.  Denver can't run!
    	This should be a good game Sunday.  My only problem will be that I
    will be on the plane again durring the game.  I stop off in Denver
    before getting to San Jose.  I'll be wearing my Browns coat when I get
    off the plane!  
    	The way I see it ... The Browns will mix it up on offense and break
    it open with the pass.  2nd half will be all run for the Browns.  The
    Broncos will just pass, pass, pass.  Hopefully there will be enough
    pressure on Eitherway to make him make mistakes.
    	The Browns will win this one in the end on a Matt Stover field goal
    and an Eitherway interception.
    
    	The DAWGS will be out in force!  The stadium will be sold out!
    Over 80,000 fans will go crazy!  Look for Leroy Hoard to have a big
    game.
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.208QUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Wed Nov 03 1993 15:357
      The Browns will have to pass.  Denver has a great rush defense,  but
    their pass defense sucks.  Of course they are going against a mediocre
    spot OL,  so they may get another few sacks this weekend.
    
      You sure are spending alot of DEC $$$ there Hal (-)
    
      Tim
61.209PFSVAX::JACOBThe King returns!Wed Nov 03 1993 18:5516
    They take sewage sludge, pump it into the stadium in Clevescum, paint
    the crap green and call it turf.
    
    Then, ya take 80,000 "fans" who bring and eat and throw dog bones, fill
    up the stadium with them, and the cumulative IQ of the stadium goes
    DOWN by 42 points.
    
    The whole city of Clevescum has been overcome by the noxious fumes of
    their industry.  The rivers there are nearly flammable, as the Cuyahoga
    river was some year back when it caught fire, and anybody who moves
    away from there should be first commended for their brains in making
    the decision, and then quaranteened fer about 25 years until the
    toxicity flushes out of them.
    
    JaKe
    
61.210METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Nov 03 1993 19:026
JaKe tell us how you REALLY feel.

The Crazy Met

so when do those kiddies start pulling on your beard??

61.211Bronco's against the Browns OhMy !OURGNG::RIGGENSales gets commisions we get &quot;JACK&quot;Wed Nov 03 1993 21:2215
Since 1971 the bronco's have only lost twice in the city of Cleveland municipal
Stadium. The last loss was in 1989 and we won't talk about the browns officials 
changing the directions to hinder a feild goal attempt. 

I think the Browns have a strong Defense this year, nothing stronger than the 
Raiders, Chargers, Cheifs. The Running attack is much inproved in the last
3 weeks with Rob Bernstine (bear) coming along very well. 

Only 1 suggestion to any cleveland fan .....


DON'T LET ELWAY GET THE BALL WITH 2 MINUTES LEFT IN THE GAME WITH A CHANCE TO 
WIN.


61.212SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsWed Nov 03 1993 22:427
    
    Hal
    
    Give me a call while you are out here . I will get you on the net so 
    you can yank chains after the Browns beat the doinks.
    
    Ron
61.213MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Mon Nov 08 1993 13:597
    re: .212
    
    If Hal had any guts - ha! - he would call and note now that the Browns
    were massacred by the Broncos. 
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.214SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsMon Nov 08 1993 14:164
    
    Well the offer is still open , god that game inhaled. To add to the
    insult they pre-empted the game here on the left coast to put on the
    patriots......ouch.
61.215QUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Mon Nov 08 1993 15:431
      Groaner/Hal day watch 1?
61.216no more skirt chasin16421::HEISERthe NBA: it's pretty darn goodMon Nov 08 1993 17:071
    ESPN is reporting that Kosar has been waived.
61.217QUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Mon Nov 08 1993 17:085
      Just heard on the RA-dio that Kosar was just cut.  Any confirmations? 
    Tampa, faiders, lams, KC, and cinnci are a few teams needing a QB.  I
    give the faids the nod, they like has beens (-)
    
      Tim
61.218QUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Mon Nov 08 1993 17:092
      Notes banging........re-last 2
    
61.219Vinnie is out for the year, no?CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Nov 08 1993 17:461
    I don't git it.  Who's gonna play QB now?
61.220METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Nov 08 1993 17:514
maybe they'll take after boxing and just select some guy from 
the stands.

The Crazy Met
61.221CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 08 1993 17:5314
This is quite a surprise, especially based on what I saw on HBO's NFL
program on Saturday and all the hype about how they both had contract
extensions.  Unless this is a cruel MrT-type hoax...


Much as I like Bill Belichick I'll say this:  he's an ASS for doing this.
Belichick ain't no offensive guy and it sounds like his ego got hurt
because Bernie was checking off too much at the line.

As usual, the Browns look like a bunch o' buffoons.....if this is true
and not a MrT-type "innocent collij prank"


'Saw
61.222it ain't no prank!CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Mon Nov 08 1993 18:2323
>>As usual, the Browns look like a bunch o' buffoons.....if this is true
>>and not a MrT-type "innocent collij prank"

Article 7311 of clari.sports.football:
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Subject: Browns release Kosar
Copyright: 1993 by UPI, R
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 93 13:43:47 EST
Location: ohio
ACategory: sports
Codes: ysfpuxx., &sfpuoh., //ns--s/, tnrb...., ns--s
Note: urgent
Lines: 7

	CLEVELAND (UPI) -- Cleveland Browns quarterback Bernie Kosar has been
released by the Browns.
	In a terse statement, the Browns announced Monday that Kosar, who
recently signed a multi-million dollar contract, had been released.
	Kosar was in his ninth year with the Browns, but differences with
coach Bill Belichick about the offense apparently led to the Browns'
action.

61.223What about Bernie?CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Mon Nov 08 1993 18:254
What will happen with Bernie?  Will Marty Schottenheimer try to sign
him as insurance against an ailing Joe Montana?

Jerry
61.224PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Nov 08 1993 18:3810
>What will happen with Bernie? 
  
  I suspect a lot of teams would like to sign him. In fact I wouldn't 
  even mind it if the Steeler's dumped that stiff, Tomzak and got Bernice
  to wear Black n Gold. But he'll probably want way to much money and I think
  he's good enough to play first string for a lot of teams.

  I predict Bernice will end up in Tampa Bay.

	Keith
61.225MKFSA::LONGa foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mindMon Nov 08 1993 18:4115
  
>>  I suspect a lot of teams would like to sign him. In fact I wouldn't 
>>  even mind it if the Steeler's dumped that stiff, Tomzak and got Bernice
>>  to wear Black n Gold. But he'll probably want way to much money and I think
>>  he's good enough to play first string for a lot of teams.


	Keith,  you need your mouth rinsed with a warm Iron City for talk 
	like that!  "Bernice in Black and Gold"...perish the thought.

	Next you are going to tell me that Mean Joe Greene is coaching
	on a team other than the Steelers.


	billl
61.226CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 08 1993 18:4314
Okay, it ain't a prank.

WOW....   

Yeah, he'll probably end up in Tampa Bay.  


This move will haunt Cleveland.....

 
I'll bet WFAN is buzzing over this......


'Saw
61.227PFSVAX::JACOBSo close to zero groundMon Nov 08 1993 18:4413
    Bernice is gone from Clevescum?????
    
    Belichick mudta had something put in his coffee!!
    
    Will HAL ever return to this note now that his HERO is gonzo????
    
    The Brown(spot)s(tm) are now going to go into a tailspin towards the
    bottom of the AFC Central.  An just in time!!!!
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    
    JaKe
    
61.228Anybody check the roof over at HLO?NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 08 1993 18:446
    
    What about Hal?  I'm genuinely concerned about our friend's mental
    state right about now...  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
61.229TNPUBS::ALVEYDead Runners Society - Carpe ViamMon Nov 08 1993 18:453
this wouldn't have happened if art modell was still alive.
what a #%$*&@ bummer
dr.a
61.230METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Nov 08 1993 18:476
Hal is in California this week. thankfully Northern California or he
might go to Malibu and burn himself and everything thats left :-)

Was Kosar's contract guaranteed? partially guaranteed??

The Crazy Met
61.231METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Nov 08 1993 18:495
>this wouldn't have happened if art modell was still alive.

huh??

The Crazy Met
61.232PFSVAX::JACOBSo close to zero groundMon Nov 08 1993 18:5313
    
>>this wouldn't have happened if art modell was still alive.
    
    Uh, Art IS alive.  Maybe Art was having second thoughts about paying
    Bernice all that donero, and Bernice only performing as an average
    individual.  Maybe he found out Bernice was spending too much of the
    money for new "wardrobe" items at Frederick's of Hollywood.  Maybe he
    didn't like the fack that Bernice's game "heels" were 4" longer than
    they should have been thus hampering Bernice's ability to evade
    passrushers, and to get a stable stance when setting up to throw.
    
    JaKe
    
61.233PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Nov 08 1993 18:5511
>> >this wouldn't have happened if art modell was still alive.

>> huh??

  Well, it's true that his heart is still tickin. But a lot of us medical 
  experts here in SPORTS, think he's brain dead.

  Billl, yer right. I'll have to plead temporary insanity. But if'n I get 
  my mouth washed out with an Iron, could it at least be cold.

	Keith
61.234CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Nov 08 1993 18:552
    Yabut I'm serious.  Who IS gonna play QB the rest of the sesaon for da
    Browns?
61.235A new line of Pantsuits is also on the way.SPECXN::BROWNReal Men only need 12 bitsMon Nov 08 1993 18:567
	Now Bernie can complete his merchandising of a new Fall/Winter line of
dresses for Wards. His main competition is the Jaclyn Smith collection for 
K-Mart. A spokesman for the Smith group was very comcerned over the possibilites
of Bernies new line of "Sack" dresses with matching FauPumps.

 Cadzilla2
61.236PFSVAX::JACOBSo close to zero groundMon Nov 08 1993 18:5812
    
    >>Yabut I'm serious.  Who IS gonna play QB the rest of the sesaon for da
    >>Browns?
    
    Are the rumors true that seen at the Mistake by the Lake fer tryouts
    were Brian Sipe and Mark Malone?????  cliff Stoudt is rumored to have a
    plane ticket to clevescum, too!!
    
    (8^)
    
    JaKe
    
61.237NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 08 1993 19:0111
    
>>this wouldn't have happened if art modell was still alive.
>
> huh??
    
    I took this as a ripoff of Charlie Finley's (or was it Bill Lee's?) 
    famous line of "this wouldn't have happened if Bowie Kuhn were still 
    alive..."  Get with it, TCM...
    
    glenn
    
61.238since when do I pull college pranks!16421::HEISERthe NBA: it's pretty darn goodMon Nov 08 1993 19:281
    
61.239fwiw16421::HEISERthe NBA: it's pretty darn goodMon Nov 08 1993 19:281
    BTW - the radio reports here say the contract was *NOT* guaranteed.
61.240RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Nov 08 1993 19:3416
    
    Re .227 (paraphrased)
    
  > The Browns are now going to go into a tailspin towards the bottom of
  > the AFC Central.
    
    Agreed.  Why they would release Kosar is beyond me; Bellichek
    apparently believes that it's easier to stick a square peg in a
    round hole than to find a square hole...
    
    The Browns' QBs are Todd Philcox and Brad Goebel.
    
    Someone's going to get a good QB cheap out of this...
    
    Joe
    
61.241??????????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNumber 3 Looms over FenwayMon Nov 08 1993 19:373
    
    
    Todd Philcox.....man o the hour
61.242METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Nov 08 1993 19:375
re: .240

how do you figure that someone will get a good, chepa QBout of this??

The Crazy Met
61.243RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Nov 08 1993 19:4812
    
    Re .240
    
    Kosar is a good QB; not top-drawer, but his strengths make him a good
    match for many teams.  And he's not going to cost any players or draft
    picks, only money; even then, I don't think he'll command so much as
    to be problematic for most teams.
    
    BTW, I believe that his _current_ contract is guarenteed, only the
    extension he signed earlier this year is not.
    
    Joe
61.244METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Nov 08 1993 19:495
so if his current deal is guaranteed then can any team sign him for this
season at the minimum - similar to baseball - and the Browns pick up
the rest? anyone know how this works??

The Crazy Met
61.245SNAX::ERICKSONPlease walk under my tree stand....Mon Nov 08 1993 19:5212
	Bernie "Cement Shoes" Kosar proved this year that he doesn't have
it anymore, not that he had much anyways. Didn't Vinny "Even Tampa doesn't
want me" Testaverde replace Bernice in two games with the Browns behind?
Bringing them back in the 4th quarter to victory. Who was quarterbacking
when Metcalf ran back 2 punts for td's against the Squeelers? I think it
was Vinny. Point I'm trying to make is that the Browns record is overrated.
they are currently 5-3 and could have lost the 3 games I mentioned and be
2-6. The Browns offense is not producing leaving there defence on the field
too much.

Ron
61.246DECWET::METZGERAmerica's most beloved game show hostMon Nov 08 1993 20:0018
I don't think football has rules like in baseball TCM because most of the
contracts are NOT guarenteed. My guess is that any team can sigh him for
whatever and he still gets the $$ from Cleveland until his current deal 
is through...

I don't think he'll end up in Tampa because Erickson is doing a pretty decent
job at QB this season and they aren't platyoff bound. I'd say he has a better
chance of landing in any of Chicago, Miami, Minny, New Orleans, Philly, or even
Washington. Teams that think they can win it all this year or next. 

I'd lay good money on him heading back to Florida or New Orleans...but he'd get
crushed against the turf in NO and be out with a concussion faster than you can
say Wade Wilson....

I'm sure the switchboard is lighting up in the mistake by the lake....

Metz
61.247METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Nov 08 1993 20:115
re: .245

their/there/they're alert

The Crazy Met
61.248So, the question is still on the tableAKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 08 1993 20:244
    >>>Yabut I'm serious.  Who IS gonna play QB the rest of the sesaon for da
    >>>Browns?
    
    Millen, Hobson, Erickson, Flutie?  
61.249PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 08 1993 21:053
61.250PFSVAX::JACOBSo close to zero groundMon Nov 08 1993 21:1810
61.251PFSVAX::JACOBSo close to zero groundTue Nov 09 1993 01:4920
    Heard Bernice on the radio during MNF tonight.  Said he's really
    dissappointed that he was released and says Belichick has a lot of
    moral problems right now on the 'Spots.  He said the "diminished
    skills" and "not throwing well anymore" arguments are a crock of dung.
    
    then Greg Gumbel said something about Belichick will be there fer a
    while because he just got a contract extension, to which Bernice
    replied, "yeah, but so did I."
    
    Bernice went on to say that the thing that makes him feel the worst is
    the fack that he
    
    Just got a whole new set of evening gowns in Brown and Orange, with
    matching pumps.  He said the special orange and brown strapless
    designer gown cost him over $2000, and he's pissed and may sit in the
    Dawg pound nexted home game and throw the brown and orange high heels
    at the 'Spots.
    
    JaKe
    
61.252MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Tue Nov 09 1993 03:129
    > moral problems
    
    JaKe does that mean that his players are sleeping around or somethin'
    ????
    
    :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.253RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetTue Nov 09 1993 11:0433
    
    Re .245
    
  > Bernie "Cement Shoes" Kosar proved this year that he doesn't have
  > it anymore, not that he had much anyways.
    
    About the only thing Kosar hasn't done well this year, that he has in
    the past, was to hit the long bombs.  He seemed a bit off on those, and
    that might be a real decline in skill.  But he still hit the short-to-
    medium range passes, still reads defenses very well, and still avoids
    intereceptions.
    
  > Didn't Vinny "Even Tampa doesn't
  > want me" Testaverde replace Bernice in two games with the Browns behind?
    
    Yes - in Oakland, where he managed a comeback in spite of a so-so
    performance, and in Indianapolis, where he made a winable game
    unwinable.
    
  > Point I'm trying to make is that the Browns record is overrated.
  > they are currently 5-3 and could have lost the 3 games I mentioned and be
  > 2-6. The Browns offense is not producing leaving there defence on the field
  > too much.
    
    Absolutely - and it has been since the second week of the season.  The
    first two weeks, when Kosar was given much more leeway to call his own
    plays, the Browns offense was a bit better.  Not great, by any stretch -
    the OL still isn't good enough to claim that with anyone at QB - but
    decent, at least.
    
    I'd guess a 2-6 second half right now... B^(
    
    Joe
61.254USCTR1::KINGLook, I can hear what you are thinking.....Tue Nov 09 1993 11:263
    Hal and Groaner watch... Day 2...
    
    REK
61.255CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Nov 09 1993 11:568
I too agree that with Bernie at the helm, checking off when needed, the
Browns offense was better.  Bellichick doesn't know offense.  He's a defensive
wizard, but he needs an offensive coordinator.  

He made an issue of Bernie checking off, and then released him.  Poor move.


'Saw
61.256I recall Bernie ....AKOCOA::BREENPatriots(too) guilty of malicious woundingTue Nov 09 1993 11:588
    I can recall a few years back while traveling thru Ohio on the way to
    Michigan (or back) listening to Browns play an important game,
    possibly a playoff game(Jets?) and Bernie engineering and last ditch
    comeback drive to salvage a win (I won't say of Elwayian proportions).
    
    He certainly showed a lot of guts that day.
    
    But he's no Otto Graham
61.257SNAX::ERICKSONPlease walk under my tree stand....Tue Nov 09 1993 12:4311
	Interesting stat they had lasted night. To sorta backup the
diminishing skills theory. In Bernie's last 16 starts the Browns are 5-11.
One of those wins is when he was replaced by Testaverde. Two more of those
wins were against Cincinati. I would guess that 16 starts brings you back
to the '91 season. Maybe a change will be good for him, I guess quite a few
teams have already contacted his agent. Todd Philcox will be the starting
QB for the Browns. ESPN also reported that the Browns might be signing
Tom Tupa later this week.

Ron
61.258not too bright16421::HEISERthe NBA: it's pretty darn goodTue Nov 09 1993 14:096
    One of the locals interviewed a guy from WWWE this morning and he said
    that Kosar was changing the plays in the huddle during Sunday's loss. 
    You can get away with audiblizing, but he was outright changing them in
    the huddle and they still weren't getting anything done.
    
    Mike
61.259RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetTue Nov 09 1993 14:5215
    
    Re .258
    
    Interesting... the word out of Cleveland is that the final drive was
    when Kosar was changing the plays.  Supposedly Kosar and Jackson drew
    out the play that went for a touchdown in the dirt.  Don't know if
    there's anything to this or not...
    
    I think it's clear that Kosar's abilities and Bellichek's offensive
    ideas don't work together.  Seems clear to me that the best solution
    would have been to tailor the offensive plan to Kosar's strengths, but
    Bellichek doesn't seem willing to do that, which isn't going to win
    games.  B^(
    
    Joe
61.260CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Nov 09 1993 15:0315
>    I think it's clear that Kosar's abilities and Bellichek's offensive
>    ideas don't work together.  Seems clear to me that the best solution
>    would have been to tailor the offensive plan to Kosar's strengths, but
>    Bellichek doesn't seem willing to do that, which isn't going to win
>    games.  B^(
    

Bellichik doesn't know offense.  He's great on defense.  The Giants
proved that in 1986.   

He should have an offensive coordinator there, but for some reason (ego?)
doesn't want one.

'Saw

61.261Kansas City Kansas City here I come !OURGNG::RIGGENSales gets commisions we get &quot;JACK&quot;Tue Nov 09 1993 16:123
I thing the no Montana Chiefs will make a offer for a single season for Bernie 
to come home under Marty Shotenhiney. 

61.262QUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Tue Nov 09 1993 16:324
      It looks like the Broncos helped this decision!! (-).  Bernie can't
    beat them.
    
      Tim
61.263PFSVAX::JACOBSo close to zero groundWed Nov 10 1993 10:5714
    The really funny part of this releasing of Bernice thang is who the
    'Spots signed yesterday to take Bernice's spot
    
    
    TOMMY TUPA!!!!
    
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    
    Look out bottm of the AFC Central, the 'Spots are going to be falling
    in fast.
    
    JaKe
    
61.264RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetWed Nov 10 1993 11:024
    
    Rumor has Kosar going to the Cowboys...
    
    Joe
61.265AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSWed Nov 10 1993 11:495
    Rumor confirmed.  Dallas has picked up Kosar.  I think this is a great
    move on JJ's part as Dallas has a tremendous offensive line that will
    provide protection to an immobile QB like Kosar.
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
61.266what me bitter?TNPUBS::ALVEYDead Runners Society - Carpe ViamWed Nov 10 1993 12:408
this life-long browns fan hopes they get thrashed by
the seahawks and everybody else they face (even the steelers, JaKe)
until bellicheck gets fired.

and please don't let bernie land in dallas...cannot root for j.johnson.

lotsa browns paraphrenalia for sale, cheap
dr.a
61.267PFSVAX::JACOBSo close to zero groundWed Nov 10 1993 13:1415
    Here in Pittsburgh, we're only 2-1/2 hours from Clevescum, and when the
    wind is right(or should that be "wrong") we can smell it.
    
    One of the people in the office here lives about halfway between here
    and the Mistake on the Lake.  He was listening to the sports talk shows
    the past couple of days and said that the 'Spots fans are bitching
    bigtime about Belichick and the Clevescum mgmt.  Many have said they
    will not go to anymore 'spots games, and are planning on switching
    their team allegiance to, get this, the STEELERS.
    
    Glad to see they're finally thinking of following a REAL team.
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.268MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Nov 10 1993 13:176
    
  >>  Here in Pittsburgh, we're only 2-1/2 hours from Clevescum
    
      Gee, there's another big selling point for Pittsburgh.    
    
    
61.269TNPUBS::ALVEYDead Runners Society - Carpe ViamWed Nov 10 1993 13:194
detroit would be a better choice to switch allegience to, 
but they got the right idea, JaKe.
boycott the bastids 'til modell and bellicheck get gone.
dr.a
61.270CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Nov 10 1993 13:4823
The funniest thing to me is the way Pittsburgh and Cleveland folks go
at it about how shitty the other city is.

From what I've seen of both cities, they've come a long way and neither
are as bad as say, Bridgeport CT.


Now, getting back to the Browns fiasco, I think that Bellichick is wrong,
dead wrong, and was reacting more out of some Napoleonic complex "I'm
the coach, I'm the coach", than out of any brainpower.

Anybody knows that you build an offense around your assets, and lets face
it, Kosar was an asset to the Browns.  Yeah, he wasn't mobile, and he
threw funny, but he was the least intercepted QB ever.   

Bellichick didn't know enough offense to build an offense around anything
and he was too proud to get an offensive coordinator.....


And I used to like him too....  This move was dumb.


'Saw
61.271too bad Swann is out16421::HEISERthe NBA: it's pretty darn goodWed Nov 10 1993 14:041
    I wonder if he'll start against Phoenix this week since Aikman is hurt.
61.272USCTR1::KINGLook, I can hear what you are thinking.....Wed Nov 10 1993 14:083
    What ever happen to Hugh Millan, the old Pats QB?
    
    REK
61.273DYPSS1::ROPERMAC IS BACK!Wed Nov 10 1993 14:186
    Hugh Millan was a big dissapointment in training camp this year.  He's
    listed as 3rd string on the depth chart behind number 2 Jason Garret.
    
    I suspect he will be cut before the weekend.
    
     - Bob Roper
61.274SCCAT::SHERRILLbetter than a ferret down the pantsWed Nov 10 1993 15:194
    
    A friend of mine is a Steeler fan (still owes me a case of Becks from
    the first game)said he would start a rumor that Bubby Brister was
    coming to Cleveland.He Was also gonna bring his mum. 
61.275Handley?CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Wed Nov 10 1993 15:5013
I'm kind of hesitant to put this in here, but I suppose it could be
true.

In one of the Internet news group, someone is saying that ESPN has
learned that the Browns has signed Ray Handly as assistant head
coach, and that he will provide consultation or something like that
to Belicheck for the offense.  There was also something about him
being involved in improving player relations.

Yeah, I know.  It sounds like BS, but this is kind of a BSy conference,
so I thought I'd put it in here.

Jerry
61.276CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Nov 10 1993 16:543
Jerry --

Save that one for April.......8^)
61.277You mean the Playmate?CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Wed Nov 10 1993 20:439
>>           <<< Note 61.276 by CAM3::WAY "You can't polish a turd" >>>

>>Save that one for April.......8^)

April?  Who's April?

Jerry

P.S.  I had a feeling that a Giant's fan might reply to this.;-)
61.278Hal in Black n Gold ?PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFWed Nov 10 1993 21:0210
>    and the Mistake on the Lake.  He was listening to the sports talk shows
>    the past couple of days and said that the 'Spots fans are bitching
>    bigtime about Belichick and the Clevescum mgmt.  Many have said they
>    will not go to anymore 'spots games, and are planning on switching
>    their team allegiance to, get this, the STEELERS.

  Where's Hal when you really need him ? I'll be sittin at the edge of my
  terminal waitin fer Hal's reply to this gem.

	Keith    
61.279PFSVAX::JACOBGonna show her my ding-dongWed Nov 10 1993 21:4410
    
 >> Where's Hal when you really need him ? I'll be sittin at the edge of my
 >> terminal waitin fer Hal's reply to this gem.
    
    Nah, the HALWatch will reach 300 before he gets in here, or about the
    time the 'Spots hire 59 more assistant coaches next summer in
    preparation for another "fine" season.
    
    JaKe
    
61.280CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Nov 10 1993 22:1313
The sad part is that inept coaching will cost the browns what
COULD have been a fine season.

This move with Kosar will blow any chance the browns had.....


hahahahaha.......


'Saw


PS April who?  Why Miss April of course.......
61.281PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 11 1993 12:222
    Boy you guys have short memories.  Hal is out on the West Coast and
    away from a terminal.
61.282just pinned my ExcuseOmeter!16421::HEISERthe NBA: it's pretty darn goodThu Nov 11 1993 12:331
    
61.283QUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Thu Nov 11 1993 13:175
      Ok Hal is covered,  but Groaner isn't!
    
      Have the Browns ever beat the Broncos?  Tweeking question for Iceman.
    
      Tim
61.284CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 15 1993 13:4618
Well, it certainly seems that Bill Belichick blew it bigtime in Brownsland.

I mean, when you lose to the Seahawks, 22-5 something is seriously wrong.

Without a doubt this will rank as one of the all-time stupid decisions
in SPORTS.  And the saddest part for Browns fans was that, no matter what,
the Browns were in first place, with a promising future for the rest of
the season.   If I were them, I'd be looking to find another team to
root for now....

The funniest part is that Modell backed this thing up.  I mean, he
tacetly approved letting Bernie go.   That's pretty wild....


Man, I'm glad I'm not a Browns fan......


'Saw
61.285PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 15 1993 14:214
61.286PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Nov 15 1993 14:495
  HALwatch day ....

   Could someone help me out ? I've forgotten how many days it's been.

	Keith
61.287PFSVAX::JACOBHo, Ho, Freakin' Ho!!!Mon Nov 15 1993 18:4710
    
 >> HALwatch day ....

 >>  Could someone help me out ? I've forgotten how many days it's been.

    I think it cain almost be "HALWatch Week ?" as opposed to "day".
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.288CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 15 1993 18:484
Hal's like on vacation or something out in Northern California....FYI.


'Saw
61.289PFSVAX::JACOBHo, Ho, Freakin' Ho!!!Mon Nov 15 1993 18:535
    Yeah, but we are now in HALWatch week 3, cause he was lasted in here on
    the 3rd of Nov.
    
    JaKe
    
61.290CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 15 1993 18:557
Yeah, but vacations and stuff don't count, and all that crap happened while
he was on vacation.....

He told us (or someone did) that he was going to be away.....


'saw
61.291PFSVAX::JACOBHo, Ho, Freakin' Ho!!!Mon Nov 15 1993 19:044
    I thunk it were on business on the left coast.
    
    JaKe
    
61.292PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Nov 15 1993 20:338
  With HAL being a true Sportaholic and Dog Pounder, one would expect him
  to call off his vacation n book an emergency flight back to the
  Mistake by the Lake. And then get his butt into this notes file where he 
  belongs. This last week and a half has been an incredible time for
  Browns fans, considering the Bernice affair and the fact that some of them 
  are jumpin ship and startin to wear Black n Gold.

	Keith
61.293MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Tue Nov 16 1993 04:1110
    Hal is in a part of the West Coast where if he were manly 
    enough to take his lumps he could EASILY get access to the net.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
    ps to Kev: It is not really 1:05AM. Where I am it is 2:05PM. If
    you see me noting at 2PM (time stamp that is) then
    it means stuff over here ain't goin' well.
    
    
61.294JaKe comes outta the closetPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 16 1993 19:2821
       <<< SWECSC::DISK$PELLE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]AMERICAN_FOOTBALL.NOTE;4 >>>
                   -< American Football all over the world. >-
================================================================================
Note 358.27               Cleveland Browns (1993-1994)                  27 of 32
PFSVAX::JACOB "Ho, Ho, Freakin' Ho!!!"               14 lines  16-NOV-1993 00:42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    >>Kosar didn't throw many TDs but doesn't he have a real low int. rate?
    >>(it was Modell who canned him,wasn't it?)
    
    One of the lowest INT rates of all time.
    
    Everything I've read was that it was Bellichick that started the ax
    swinging, cause he didn't like Kosar's will to check off plays at the
    line, which he does frequently, and well, because he reads defenses so
    well.  Bill B. and he didn't see eye to eye on the matter and Bill B.
    initiated the release.  Dumb move, if'n ya ask me.
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.295PTOVAX::JACOBHo, Ho, Freakin' Ho!!Tue Nov 16 1993 19:307
    re.294
    
    Now who the hell's been in my account?????
    
    
    Santa_JaKe
    
61.296VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDMichaelJacksonIsConcealingEvidenceTue Nov 16 1993 19:445
    	My guess is that Bellichick made a deal with Modell that if he
    scrapped Bernie he would get the 'Spots in the playoffs.  My other guess
    is that Bill will be looking for employment at the end of the season.
    
    				/Don
61.297CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Nov 17 1993 12:1012
Bill B. committed one of the biggest errors in judgement of all time.

Further, he let personal feelings get in the way of putting a winning
football team on the field.   

Bottom line, he blew it.....

I guess all that new equipment, and a staff of coaches for coaches can't
make up for one bonehead move by the head man....


'Saw
61.298TNPUBS::ALVEYDead Runners Society - Carpe ViamWed Nov 17 1993 16:314
i hope they gave belicheck his well-deserved game ball
sunday in seattle

dr.a
61.299CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Nov 17 1993 16:477
>i hope they gave belicheck his well-deserved game ball
>sunday in seattle
>
>dr.a

yeah....really.....

61.300PTOVAX::JACOBHo, Ho, Freakin' Ho!!Wed Nov 17 1993 18:4226
    Got a phone call today at home from our ol' SPROTSter, --dan'l.
    
    He said "hi" to alla younzes.
    
    He wanted me to pass on a message to Groaner(whose out there, but
    ashamed to show his face now that the 'Spots are in a free fall) and
    HAL.
    
    From --dan'l:
    
    "ain't it nice to see that the Browns have conceded that the Steelers
    are the better team by throwing in the towel at the halfway point of
    the season, when the teams were tied at 5-3.  Even NPR, the ultra
    liberal yuppy station ran a feature saying how bad the Browns have
    always been to their players, and what a bonehead move releasing Kosar
    was.  they also said that it was thru mistreatment that the Browns
    'forced' Jim Brown into retirement.  Jim Brown was quoted as saying
    that he asked the Browns to allow him to report 2 weeks late to summer
    training camp so that he could finish a movie he was working on, and
    the Browns refused, so Jim retired.  Nice to see that the Cleveland
    Browns are keeping with tradition and treating the players like sh_t."
    
    Amen
    
    Santa_JaKe
    
61.301PTOVAX::JACOBJohn Elway is so YUMMY!!!Mon Nov 29 1993 21:454
    HALwatch, Month1 , week 4, day 5
    
    JaKe
    
61.302CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Nov 30 1993 11:589
Boy, could the Browns suck any worse than they do right now?

Does Bellichick feel like the ULTIMATE A**HOLE?

Can the Dog Pound hurl those batteries far enough to hit him at the bench?



The saga continues....
61.303PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 12:327
61.304CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Nov 30 1993 13:1223
61.305MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Nov 30 1993 13:205
 
    The guys covering the Pats game for NBC quoted Bellichik as saying that
   Browns were moving in the right direction. They joked that if they were
   coaching they'd prefer to be moving in a winning direction. Marty Schott-
   enheimer's gotta be belly laughing every times he reads the sports page.
61.306"WE ARE HEADING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION" ???STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Nov 30 1993 13:2170
    
    	Hello All........
    
    	Well, I guess I should comment on the resent goings on with the
    Browns.....
    
    	Yes, I'm pissed!  I too believe Bill B. made a huge mistake.  I
    also can't put all the blame on him either.  I'd have to say that
    Art Model is just as much to blame.  I was very surprised by the
    release of Bernie.  Yes, he was my man!  Through thick and thin, I
    would support him.  In my mind, he was one of the best quarterbacks
    the Browns have ever had.  At least in my time.  He was the only
    hope the Browns had of reaching the playoffs this year.  Yes, he
    couldn't run around the pocket like many other quarterbacks but he
    knew where his receivers were and he knew where the defenders were.
    So, if he was sacked, there was no one open.  At least I wouldn't 
    go through a game seeing 3 or 4 INT's and saying at the end of the 
    game...."the quarterback lost the game for us".  Now, thats all I
    can say.  I don't have much faith in Philcox.  I don't have much faith 
    in Testiverdi either.  Sure they may have one good game or two, but
    for the most part....the games they play in will be poor ones.
    
    	My faith in the Browns organization have dwindled much over the 
    last few weeks and I've been doing alot of looking back.  I've looked
    back to when Ernest Byner was traded and when Webster Slaughter and 
    Regie Langhorn were let go or not pursued.  Very depressing!  A once
    great team has been tourn apart.  Why?  Because Art Model wants to
    make Bill B. happy?  What about the fans?  I'm actually very surprised
    that Clay Mathews is still on this team.  Also, I'm surprised that
    Michael Dean Perry is still on this team.  I honestly don't expect them
    to be there next year.
    
    	Right now I agree with the rest of Cleveland......Bill must go!  I
    also think that Art must go too.  It would be better for the Browns to
    have new management, new ownership and new coaching.  Instead of
    getting better, this team seems to be going in the wrong direction.  I
    mean, how many years are left in Testaverdi.  Not many.  Is Pilcox the
    next Browns QB of the future?  I think not.  Where is this team going?
    As Jake said........the bottom.  And to think that this all started
    with the team tied in first place.  And to think that one of the
    brightest QB's in the league was just released...for nothing...but ego.
    
    	I've thrown in the towel for this year.  I'll even be surprised if
    the Browns win another game this year.  The whole team is in dissarray.
    Bill has taken a tight team and torn it into shreads.  Is there
    something going on behind the sciens?  Maybe.  Does Art want to move
    out of Cleveland?  Maybe he will try and get a new team to own in the
    next expansion.  Hopefully he will and with the new team...take the
    coach with him.  At first I thought Bill would be good for the Browns.
    But, the guy don't know how to get along with anyone....he can't get
    along with the press and he can't get along with any of the players.
    
    	I'm still a Browns fan though and though.  I'm not going to throw
    out my Cleveland stuff.  I support them through the tough times, but
    when the tough times are caused by the owner and coach....I have a 
    tough time.  Very depressing indeed.  Hopefully the Browns will be able
    to bounce back next year....I'm sure it won't happen this year.  This
    team has gone through too much and won't recover.  
    
    
    	BILL MUST GO    BILL MUST GO    BILL MUST GO    BILL MUST GO
    
    
    	I will not however turn into a Dallas fan.  However, I will remain
    a Bernie Kosar fan.  I don't honestly think he will be with Dallas next
    year but I hope he gets his superbowl ring this year.  It would be only
    fitting.  It would be more fitting to see Troy go down and see Bernie
    lead the Cowboys to the superbowl.  IN YOUR FACE BILL!
    
    	THE DAWGS HAVE BEEN LET LOOSE.....BUT THEY WILL BE BACK.....
61.307CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Nov 30 1993 13:4916
Nice note Hal.


After reading your note I know EXACTLY what you feel, because it's what
I felt after the Whalers traded Ronnie Francis to Pittsburgh.

I think it was Terry Bradshaw on the pre-game show last week who showed
a shot of Bellichick and said that perhaps his coaching skills had diminished.


The only thing I can't say is that I hope Bernie gets his ring.  As a
Giants fan, I can't say that.....8^)


'Saw

61.308QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyTue Nov 30 1993 14:125
      Bernie doesn't deserve a ring,  he hasn't ever been to the SB or has
    shows that he deserves to go. Riding on the back of the cowpokes he may
    get a ring,  but not deserved...
    
      Tim
61.309MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Tue Nov 30 1993 14:126
    re: .307
    
    sort of like JaKe feels about the Bucs after they let Bonds go?? :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.310PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 14:2814
61.311PTOVAX::JACOBJohn Elway is so YUMMY!!!Tue Nov 30 1993 15:2722
    OK, who got into HAL's account and entered .306???????????
    
    (8^)
    
    >>next Browns QB of the future?  I think not.  Where is this team going?
    >>As Jake said........the bottom.  And to think that this all started
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Is this scary or what, HAL agreeing with something I said???
    
    (8^)
    
    Actually, although I ragged on him a lot, Bernice was a lot better than
    the contingency that rolled thru PGH in the post Bradshaw years, ya
    know Cliff Stoudt, Mark Malone, David Woodley, Bubby Brister...probably
    better than all them combined
    
    
    Plus, he wore nicer skirts.
    
    JaKe
    
61.312all this kissin up is makin me nauseous16421::HEISERbut I *like* it!!!Tue Nov 30 1993 15:431
    
61.313CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Nov 30 1993 16:5113
>    
>    Sounds alot like another ex-Giant coach I know.
>


Okay, so what have any of the Patriot's coaches ever done?  

Ray Berry was a great receiver, lousy coach.  The last guy was a nice
guy, lousy coach.    Rod Rust was in there somewhere too, wasn't he?
Giants fans saw how good he was.....


'Saw
61.314CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Nov 30 1993 17:155
    The last guy was a great college coach.  Mebbe no one coulda been a 
    good PATRIOTS coach.  (Especially spending half the time trying not
    to die)
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
61.315Dick McPhearson - any pal of the Ninj is OK by me...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Nov 30 1993 17:182
Yabut the problems with the Patriots were not always the coaches.  The front
office has generally consisted of people who couldn't put the air in a football.
61.316PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 17:3410
61.317CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Nov 30 1993 17:5514
>    
>    That lousy coach took them to a Super Bowl and a few other playoff
>    games.


Yep, and one of the biggest (if not THE biggest) Super Bowl defeats of 
all time.
    
    
>    He had a better record than Parcells has now with the Pats, and he did
>    it without a franchise QB.

Who would you rather have?

61.318PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 18:0214
61.319the original stonehandsCNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childTue Nov 30 1993 18:234
 overcome the loss of Fryar???? hahahahaaa Stop it Mac you're killing me...

 mike
61.320CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Nov 30 1993 18:259
Okay Mac, we can handle the Red Sox apologist role, the one liner wet-blanket
role, even the facist moderator role, but being an apologist for the Patriots
is a bit much.  Granted the team is now going in the right direction, but their
history is one of miserable falture, largely due to moronic management, foolish
coaching, and terrible evaluation of talent.  With a team like this it is 
rediculous to defend the past.  All you can do is hope that they eliminate the
past faltures and build for the future.

=Bob=
61.321PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 18:297
    No Pats apologist here, =bob=.  Just saying that some of the previous
    Pats' coaches were scapegoats and that Parcells has made some very
    questionable personnel decisions.
    
    I apologize to the Browns fans for the tangent, but I think the
    question of whether or not these ex-Giant coaches are all they are
    cracked up to be just has to be asked.
61.322CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Nov 30 1993 18:5218
The only ex-Giant coach (except for Ray The Boob Handley who's fallen off
the face of the Earth) that is screwing anything up is Bill Belichick.

He took a good team, with a winning record, and managed to destroy the
morale, and turn it into a loser.

Parcells is doing okay in New England -- giving that it must be a total
rebuilding year anyway, and not unlike his first year in New York.

Tom What's his name up at BC has had a successful season.

So, for the most part, ex-Giant coaches are doing quite well.

Fryar is old, and is only a role player in Miami - so I agree with Mike
Childs......


'Saw
61.323PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 18:556
61.324This is opposed to Red Sox-style "now and never" approachNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Nov 30 1993 19:0027
    Even given the low expectations, I'd have to rate Parcells' performance
    as average at best this season.  But let's not get carried away with
    these comparisons with a couple of amateurs like Ray Berry and Dick 
    MacPherson.  Even given the low talent level that he's got to work with 
    for now and the fact that the critical mistakes have continued during
    the learning process, at least there's been some consistency of effort 
    from week to week under Parcells.  You didn't have that with Berry's 
    detached laissez-faire attitude or MacPherson's rah-rah collegiate 
    approach, a couple of guys out on the absolute extremes of emotionalism...
    
    Granted, right now these guys are hell to watch and were much more
    interesting in some other seasons under these other coaches, and granted 
    I don't have to sit through the boring games as the more devoted fans do, 
    but even still, despite what he may being saying now about winning
    always being the goal (sure it is-- you always try as hard as you can with 
    the hand you're building for the future), Parcells was not hired to "make 
    things interesting" in the short term.  So he dumped Irving Fryar for 
    nothing, who might have made the difference between a 2-14 season and a 
    4-12 season (and although it shouldn't be the goal, the loss of a premium 
    draft pick).  Big deal; when the Pats start winning in 2-3 years Fryar 
    will be a distant memory.  To tell you the truth, the Pats are blowing 
    all these games but the output from some of the guys who I thought were 
    complete stiffs has been surprising.  Especially on defense...
    
    glenn
    
61.325MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Nov 30 1993 19:198
    Parcells made a vow that he would not keep anyone who didn't want to
   be here. Irving didn't want to be here. So long, Irving. Like Glenn says,
   it's a short term loss. And a small one at that. Parcells isn't a complete
   moron, he got as much for Fryar as he could. If that wasn't much well,
   so be it. Apparently some Pats fans think Fryar was a bigger commodity 
   than the entire NFL did. By the time this team is really ready to contend 
   Fryar will be too old to help them anyways.
61.326PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 19:332
    I take it Fryar is up on the wall next to Boggs in the Brydie Hall of
    Fame.
61.327He was droppin back at NU too....CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childWed Dec 01 1993 11:1913
 Normally you'd think that Mac, except that I'm not enamoured with Parcells
 like Saw is. Saw, still goes goo goo everytime he tells the Parcells/Burt
 story....

 ;^)

 I think it just a case here of two guys with 20-20 vision that see Fryar
 for what he real is, a waste of skin. When you think of what he has done
 with the physical gifts he was blessed with it's a shame. Did he ever hold 
 on to a game winner in his life during a final drive? 

 mike
61.328Bernie BacklashSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed Dec 01 1993 11:2219
    
    	Letters from around the US...
    
    	Dear BN/I,
    
    	Whether you are or are not a Bernie Kosar fan is not important. 
    What just happened to the team stinks!  They have written off any hopes
    of the playoffs, let alone the division title.  I've been a dedicated
    Browns fan for 35 years.  I've seen them lose badly and win barely. 
    This is the final straw - give away your starting quarterback with no
    backup in sight!
    	The problem is (Belichick) knows defense but not offense.  Someone
    should call Lindy Infante!  I don't call going from a 6-10 record to
    7-9 a turnaround.  Try going 2-14 to Super Bowl champions.
    	I'm very happy for Bernie.  He will finally get a Super Bowl ring. 
    Now he can come back to Cleveland and show the Browns what the ring
    looks like.
    
    	Placerville, Calif.
61.329Bernie BacklashSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed Dec 01 1993 11:5626
    
    	Dear BN/I,
    
    	I've been a Browns fan since I was seven, almost 31 years.  I've
    seen good and bad times, but I've never seen anything like the last
    bunch of years.  The team was one of the best in the league with
    offensive coordinator Lindy Infante.  Then it started to go bad.  Marty
    Schottenheimer ruined the team with terrible drafting and the spiteful
    trade of Earnest Byner.
    	Bill Belichick comes in and ruins the receiving corps by losing
    Webster Slaughter, Reggie Langhorne and Brian Brennan.  Two of them are
    stars for other teams.  The team is only now bouncing back from that
    escapade when all of a sudden Bernie Kosar is released at a time when
    the team has no one to replace him. 
    	Is it me or does it seem like the Browns brain trust keeps cutting
    off their noses.  I suppose next they'll be getting rid of Eric
    Metcalf, Mike Johnson and Michael Dean Perry.  I can't help but ask,
    "What the hell is going on?"
    
    	
    		Seekonk, Mass
    
    
    
    		WOOF!
    
61.330CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 01 1993 12:0116
Thing was, I HATED Parcells when he first came to New York.  That first
season we were ready to ship him out the door.

Then he changed my mind.

Fryar was spent.  What Parcells got for him shows what the rest of the
league thought of him too.


The Browns are toast this season, and probably next also....


'Saw


PS  MikeyC, you gots to admit that Burt story is a GREAT story....
61.331Bernie BacklashSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed Dec 01 1993 12:0912
    
    	Dear BN/I,
    
    	I looked up the work "totalitarian" in the dictionary.  There I
    found a picture of Bill Belichick.
    
    
    		Herndon, Va.
    
    
    
    		WOOF! WOOF!
61.332Bernie BacklashSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed Dec 01 1993 14:2214
    
    	Dear BN/I,
    
    	It will be very amusing to see all of Bill Belichick's critics
    elbow each other out of the way to get on line to kiss his butt when
    the Browns make the playoffs and eventually win the Super Bowl.
    	When was the last time we were in first place at midseason?  What
    can you morons possibly be thinking about?
    
    
    		Manchester, N.H.
    
    
    	He said morons...
61.333PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 01 1993 14:521
    Who is BN/I?
61.334PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 01 1993 14:549
61.335CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 01 1993 14:548
>    Who is BN/I?


My guess is a Browns fan publication, somewhat akin to TGN (The Giants
Newsweekly).

'Saw

61.336CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 01 1993 14:5627
61.337MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 01 1993 15:026
  I've watched a few Miami games and Irving *has* been effective for them.
 He's had a few catches like the one against us and seems more sure-handed 
 down there than he ever did for us. He's Miami's big play guy. Good for 
 them. It still boils down to the guy wanting out of NE and him being ~30 
 years old. We got just about all we were going to get for him.
61.338MKFSA::LONGT- 8 days and counting...Wed Dec 01 1993 15:556
	Yeah he's gotten more sure handed with the 'phins.  I wonder if
	he's still sure handed with the knifes his wife used to throw at
	him.


	billl
61.339PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 01 1993 16:051
    Man you guys have short memories.
61.340CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childWed Dec 01 1993 16:069
I saw Fryar against the JETS, he caught like 7 balls for 113 and TD, I think 
but with 5 minutes left in game they were trailing he dropped 2 down and outs
a TD in the endzone that hit him????? you guessed it right in the hands...

he's never ever been or going to be consistent just a flash of brillance
here and there...for all his excess baggage he ain't worth it....

 mike
61.341Bernie BacklashSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed Dec 01 1993 16:4440
    
    BN/I is ..... The Browns News/Illustrated
    
    	Last but not least...
    
    	Dear BN/I,
    
    	However pathetic the performance against the Broncos was, the
    decision to release Bernie Kosar at this point of the season is hard to
    defend as rational.  It makes no sense from a football perspective, as
    the Browns currently have no other proven quarterback.  It makes no
    sense from a financial perspective, as the Browns are obligated to pay
    Kosar almost $6 million this year whether he plays here or not. 
    Modell's highest-paid player is now a backup for the Cowboys.
    	Most importantly, whether or not Bernie could still have
    contributed to the team, it makes no sense from an ethical perspective
    to unceremoniously dump one of the greatest players ever to grace the
    ranks of this franchise.  It is especially puzzling when one considers
    the respect and courtesies the Browns have extended to other
    distinguished veterans, most recently Ozzie Newsome and Kevin Mack. 
    The immediate effect of this action will be to shatter morale.  In the
    long run the waiving of Kosar will damage fan support more than any
    possible outcome this year, even the loss of every remaining game in
    the season.
    	I have been a Browns fan all my life and have continued to follow
    the team closely in the years since I left Cleveland.  I could not
    imagine a less fitting end to the career of a player who'd exhibited a
    team loyalty unmatched in modern sport history.  Anyone deserves better
    treatment than that.  Bernie deserved much better.  I'll probably watch
    the game next week, but I don't think it will be with the same
    involvement.  I would wager that a significant number of Browns fan
    feel the same way.
    
    	
    			St. Louis, Mo.
    
    	I did and I did.
    
    Grrrrrrrrr!
    
61.342VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesWed Dec 01 1993 18:478
    	Dear BN/I,
    
    	I want to personally thank Bellichik for getting rid of that
    girly-mon, no-talent of a quarterback Bernie Kosar.  With that Albatross
    removed I look forward to the Browns making and going deep into the NFL
    playoffs.  Good job Bill!
    
    				Vinnie Testeverde
61.343PTOVAX::JACOBJohn Elway is so YUMMY!Wed Dec 01 1993 19:015
    ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooOOOOLWARD Slasher.
    
    
    JaKe
    
61.344finally a winSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Mon Dec 06 1993 12:3630




		                                              ____/\
                                                             /-    |
                                                    /-------/      |
	                                            \/\/\/\/|      \
                                                            /            
                                                    /\^^^^^^
			                            \_______________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------

 The defense wins this game with 9 QB sacks.  Neither QB for Cleveland
    was effective.  There was one play that Vinnie called an audiable.
    The pass was intercepted.  I wonder if he will be released now???
    After looking at the standings, Cleveland really doesn't look too
    bad.  It is still possible for the Browns to win the division.
    The Browns are only one game back of Houston if they win next week.
    If the Browns win the last game of the season against the Squeelers
    and the Squeelers beat the Oilers, it will be a 3 way tie for the 
    division.  Who would win?
    
    
    		Browns 17	Saints 13
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.344Browns have a pretty good record with Vinny at the helm.VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesMon Dec 06 1993 14:541
61.345'Spots luck one out and HAL returns in full forcePTOVAX::JACOBIt happened again!!!!!!Mon Dec 06 1993 19:1913
    
    >>The Browns are only one game back of Houston if they win next week.
                                                   ^^
    >>If the Browns win the last game of the season against the Squeelers
      ^^
    
    Ya, and IF a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass every time he
    jumps.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
61.346TNPUBS::ALVEYPoofter's Froth, Wyoming plans aheadTue Dec 07 1993 11:544
Somebody tell HAL that real Browns fans aren't anymore.

dr.a
61.347Season over???SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Mon Dec 13 1993 11:2537




	                            ____/\
                                   /-    |
                          /-------/      |
	                  \/\/\/\/|      \
                                  /            
                          /\^^^^^^
	                  \_______________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
                    
    	Once again the Browns find a way to lose!  Vinny throws an INT
    	at their own 40 and gives the Oilers a shot at the big winning
    	field goal.  I can't seen how the Browns will make the playoffs
    	now.  It is truely over now.  Only bragging rights remain.  
    	Browns still have a chance to win the last three but will a 9-7
    	record be enough...I doubt it.  
    
    	Stover misses two field goals in this game....46 and 56.
    
    	On a fourth down attemp in Oiler teritory, the Browns go for it.
    	Vinny tosses the ball back to Hoard...Hoard looks up and sees a
    	wide open Kitchen....the pass....about 8 yards over his head...a
    	sure TD....down the tubes.
    
    	Kevin Mack is back.  Didn't look too bad either!  4 rushes for 17
    	yards.  
    
    	Forth down and two with 45 seconds left, the Oilers to punt.....
    	Mike Johnson gets called for offsides.......game over!
    
    
    		Woof!
61.348RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Dec 13 1993 11:418
    
    'course, the season really ended when the Browns decided to release
    Kosar.
    
    Will 6-10 be enough to get Bellichek fired after a 5-2 start?  One
    can only hope...
    
    Joe
61.3499-7 has an outside shot (But can Clev beat Pitt)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Dec 13 1993 18:0117
    The Dawgs have 2 gimme games (or should) VS New England and the
    Rams so it could come down to the final game VS Pittsburg (and who
    would have the better head to head and division record etc).  I
    have to look at the schedule realiticaly and I dont see the jets
    making the playoffs (anymore), they have Dallas, Buffalo and Houston.
    So if Miami, Houston and KC win the Division you have Buffalo as a WC
    and then 2 of the following (Jets, Den, Rai and Cleve, sd has an out
    side shot as well).  Rai and Den play in the last week and each could
    lose 1 other so 9-7 could make the playoffs (anything less and your
    out thats for damn sure).  So Tie Breakers could come into play.
    The Jets have the worst shot in a tie becuase they lost to Den and
    the Rai, but I could get intresting.
    
    (I think 10-5 will take all the WC spots this year, too bad your not
    in the mighty NFC).
    
    								Mab
61.350MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 13 1993 18:1112
  >> The Dawgs have 2 gimme games (or should) VS New England and the
    
     New England is a "gimme" game? I'd think that 80% of the teams in the
     league would disagree with you and one of those teams is Cleveland.
     It's been said ad nauseum but the Pats have played everyone tough
     and now with a win finally under their belt they should play with
     confidence next week. It would be nice if the offense could gener-
     ate more than one touchdown on a *good* day but the defense will
     keep them in with anybody - a fact of which we've already seen 
     ample evidence. Cleveland will have to do alot more than just show 
     up.
61.351WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNumber 3 Looms over FenwayMon Dec 13 1993 18:1813
    
    
         Well the Raiders are at 8-5 they should beat TB. Probably lose at
    GB (gonna be cold)!!!. Than the Denver game in LA. That game will
    decide if the Raiders go. CLeveland will probably get knocked off by
    the Steelers. If Pitt loses tonight they are gonna need alot of help
    from other sources.The Jets are done as are the Chargers.
    
       What helps the Raiders is they own tie breakers over Buffalo, NyJets
    and Denver. It's gonna be interesting.
    
    
    Chappy
61.352No brainer!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Mon Dec 13 1993 18:4714
    
    	The Pats have no chance in Cleveland!
    
    	Its in the book already!
    
    		Really, look back at the games the Browns have lost this
    	year....even without Bernie, they gave games away.  At an
        unbelievable rate.  Even yesterday.  
    
    	Look for a blowout in Cleveland.  The Crush and Rush will take care
    	of the Patsies!
    
    
    		WOOF!
61.353PTOVAX::JACOBMon Dec 13 1993 18:497
    Sheesh, The 'Spots lose and HAL is in here at 8:25 the nexted morning,
    I'm impressed HAL, you finally ready to accept and root for the team a
    lot of CLevescumers' are turning to until Belichick goes, namely the
    STEELERS????
    
    JaKe
    
61.354PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 13 1993 18:495
61.355DECWET::METZGERAmerica's most beloved game show hostMon Dec 13 1993 19:0212
With the Rams running game they aren't a pushover either. The passing game
sucks but Bettis gained over 200 yards yesterday and ground Chuck is in full
gear...

I'd  give Cleveland the edge over NE because the game is in Clevelend. If they
were playing in NE then it would be a pick um...

NE won't be able to score vs. Clevelands defense...throw in some crappy weather
and you've got the amking of a 3-0  game...

Metz
61.356CSO, US Champs......8^)CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 13 1993 19:2615
On the other hand, the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra, long touted as one
of the best, and lately herald the top orchestra in the US, is celebrating
their 75th Anniversary this year.

There was a piece on CBS Sunday Morning about them, and about how times
had changed since the dictatorial George Szell was on the podium.
I've always been willing to pick up anything by the Cleveland Symphony.
They're usually damn good.


So, Hal, take heart.  The football team might be stinking up the grounds,
but the CSO is champeenship quality.....


'Saw
61.357FRETZ::HEISERno I'm really very, very shyMon Dec 13 1993 19:353
    The CSO renditions of the classics seem a little dry to me.
    
    Isn't this the team that was to go 15-1?
61.358CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 13 1993 19:375
>
>    The CSO renditions of the classics seem a little dry to me.
>    

My first choice has always been Berlin with Von Karajan......
61.359PTOVAX::JACOBMon Dec 13 1993 19:3813
    
    >>Isn't this the team that was to go 15-1?
    
    That was Groaner flapping about that record, and we ALL KNOW that's
    he's too scared to show his face in here anymore, what with the 'SPots
    going from contenders to pretenders to also rans.
    
    He'll be in here nexted year spouting off until the lose 2 games, then
    he'll dissappear faster that a Twinkie in front of William Perry.
    
    
    JaKe
    
61.360led by Sir Charles MackerrasFRETZ::HEISERno I'm really very, very shyMon Dec 13 1993 19:434
    >My first choice has always been Berlin with Von Karajan......
    
    especially for Beethoven.  I prefer the Prague Chamber Orchestra for
    Mozart.
61.361yawn, is it time to go home yet?QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Dec 13 1993 23:434
      Classical in the spots file.  I'm getting sleepy....Next you will be
    talking basball(-)
    
      Tim
61.362CLEVELAND ROCKS...THE BUZZARD!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Dec 14 1993 10:5911
    
    As previously mentioned, the DAWG defense is too good for the Pats.
    What do you think Bleedso will do when the Crush and Rush are in his
    face the whole game?  Down baby down!  6 sacks not unlikely.  The
    Browns defense is there, its the offense that has the problems.  And
    even though they have problems, they can still score above 10 points
    a game.  Eric Metcalf will have a carrier day against those patsies.
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.363TNPUBS::ALVEYPoofter's Froth, Wyoming plans aheadTue Dec 14 1993 12:129
Hal,
Does 'MMS still rule?

Are local folks supporting the Browns anymore?
As a transplanted fan, I hope they go 1-8 under Belicheck and
force Modell to fire him before he sells the team.

Go Patriots!
dr.a
61.364PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 14 1993 12:334
61.365Wouldn't mind seeing it happenSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Dec 14 1993 13:546
    
    	Even if Modell were to sell the team.....at least Cleveland
    wouldn't have to worry about the team moving from Ohio!  Unlike
    what looks to be happening here in N.E..
    
    	
61.366Would Joe go?SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Dec 14 1993 13:554
    
    	Oh yea, I heard last night that ole Art may be looking to Joe Gibbs
    	as the new coach.....
    
61.367TNPUBS::ALVEYPoofter's Froth, Wyoming plans aheadTue Dec 14 1993 14:076
Actually, in the broadcast booth (NBC?), Gibbs seems a lot
more personable than he ever did on the Redskins' sideline.
He even smiles and jokes - something I never saw before.
He coaches a boring style of football very successfully, though.

dr.a
61.368VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDThe Few, The Proud, The 1%Tue Dec 14 1993 15:085
    	I'll take the Pats and 5 for a P-Name bet Hal.  Or do you think
    this team that will sack Bledsoe 6 times isn't capable of covering a 5
    point spread?
    
    				/Don
61.369GENRAL::WADEPull!Tue Dec 14 1993 15:555
    
    	Ha!  Lookit Roachy tryin' to get points for a mainly p-name
    	bet.  C'mon Slashah, grow some!  
    
    Claybone
61.370VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDThe Few, The Proud, The 1%Tue Dec 14 1993 16:123
    	Hey Claybone, Las Vegas lives for suckers like you.
    
    				/Don
61.371AKOCOA::BREENOh come Ed MarinaroTue Dec 14 1993 16:2211
    The Browns just off my memory seem to have played very well against the
    Pat's including upset(s) of some of the mid 80s teams.  But if this
    game is at NE then an even bet should be no problem Don but if at
    Cleveland you do need some points, maybe 3.
    
    I always have respected the browns because their fans are so dedicated
    and I met one of the linebackers in '68 at Quantico - played '68-77,
    someone help me on what his name was - may have been #62
    
    It'll come to me - had a big interception on one of the monday nite
    games about 72-73.
61.372I'll have to check my football cards.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Dec 14 1993 16:299
    
    	re...breen,  must have had the last name Johnson, I bet.  Who
    knows, wasn't Clay around back then???
    
    	re...robichaud, really, do you have to have points?  Don't you
    think your team will win outright?  
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.373See LionsmanisGWEN::ASHEI ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk...Tue Dec 14 1993 16:523
    Yeah, he whines and kicks and screams and holds his breath if he
    doesn't get points...
    
61.374"I want points" = "I play soccer"GENRAL::WADEPull!Tue Dec 14 1993 18:085
    
    	Nice try Roachy.  P-name bets ain't made in Vegas!  Be a
    	main!  We're not talkin' 'bout your grocery money here.  :*)
    
    Claybone
61.375QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyTue Dec 14 1993 18:104
      Points are for people that can sucker someone in because they don't
    have the confidence in his own team.
    
      Tim
61.376MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 14 1993 18:174
  All you Donks fans are jumping on my main man Slasher for wanting points
 because you've found them to be completely useless when making Super Bowl
 bets. Hahahaha!
61.377GENRAL::WADEPull!Tue Dec 14 1993 18:239
    
    	What's this?  Now Slashah goes runnin' to his big brother
    	Tommy for some help?  :*)  Nice slam though.....you know how
    	it is with the truth.
    
    	Doesn't change a thing.  /Don has no faith in HIS team and
    	wants points.  Sissy.  :*)
    
    Claybone
61.378OLD1S::SYSTEMTue Dec 14 1993 18:299
	RE: A FEW BACK   

    At least the Donk fans got to make a few SB bets!!


  Cadzilla2

 
61.379MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 14 1993 18:427
  >> At least the Donk fans got to make a few SB bets!!

     Let's just hope that the Donks fans in here didn't bet anything
     more than coffee money.
 
    
61.380PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 14 1993 18:498
61.381GWEN::ASHEI ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk...Tue Dec 14 1993 18:494
    Like I said, see Lionsmanis.  He won't do it.  I buckled under because
    although I lost the battle, the Lions won the war and deep down /Don
    knows I was right and he was wrong...
    
61.382Pats +5 take it or leave it...VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDThe Few, The Proud, The 1%Tue Dec 14 1993 18:531
    
61.383Hey he didnt set the spread !!!MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Dec 14 1993 18:549
    Points are there for a reason, anyone who bets on an underdog without
    taking the points is a fool.  I love last weeks line, Cinncy +5, NE
    score's and you figure no way will there be a tie :-)
    
    Dont bet without the points, he knows what he's doing, I'll take most
    favorites in a bet without the points too, boy now thats taken a chance
    talk about being a girly mon, give him the pts, be a real man....
    
    								mab
61.384MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 14 1993 18:544
    >> and the Browns will sack Bledsoe 6 times (even though the Pats 
    >> OL has only allowed 22 sacks in 13 games).
    
       And the Pats haven't allowed any sacks in at least the last two games.
61.385Well spoken, dudeMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 14 1993 18:562
    
     Right on, M_Air.
61.386this ain't VegasGENRAL::WADEPull!Tue Dec 14 1993 19:057
    
    	All these Patsie fans coming to /Don's defense.  Tsk, tsk.
    	I guess they are all testosterone deficient too....
    
    	Be a main Roachy!  No points!  
    
    Claybone
61.387How much faith do I have???SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed Dec 15 1993 11:0229




	                            ____/\
                                   /-    |
                          /-------/      |
	                  \/\/\/\/|      \
                 Pats +5>>>>>>>   /            
                          /\^^^^^^    Browns win by 17>>>>>>>>>
			  \_______________
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    			I'll take that bet!
    
    
    
    
    			WOOF!
61.388Dont be a sucker...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Dec 15 1993 11:3914
    1 real man out of the whole dog pound, congrats !!!!
    
    I guess these are the same folks that would have taken cinncy
    straight up VS San Fran :-), I would have taken anyone's action
    on that game :-).
    
    The spread is there to make it even, I cant count how many times the
    spread turns out in a tie, the people know what there doing, they
    win win in a tie.  I just dont think being a Sucker has anything to
    do with testostarone...  Dont get sucker'd into a sucker's bet, take
    the pts, if any other Dawgs fan's have any faith they'll give the
    pts...
    
    								mab
61.389VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDThe Few, The Proud, The 1%Thu Dec 16 1993 16:044
    	AttaBoy Hal.  Glad to see you back your team, unlike others in
    here...  
    
    				/Don
61.390CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Dec 16 1993 16:193
    
    Hal,  you planning to attend tomorrow night at the OPP?
    
61.391WOOFWOOFWOOFWOOFWOOFWOOFWOOFWOOFWhoopsWHIMPERWHIMPERCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsSun Dec 19 1993 22:581
    
61.392PTOVAX::JACOBI'm Santa Claus!Mon Dec 20 1993 02:434
    Cain't wait to see HAL with the p_name of Slasher's choice.
    
    JaKe
    
61.393good thing they got rid of that stiff Kosar...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Mon Dec 20 1993 12:270
61.394Here it is Hal... 8^)VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDDrew &gt; Vinny &gt; BernieMon Dec 20 1993 14:551
    
61.395MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 20 1993 14:563
    
     This baby was pretty much over last week when M_Air pronounced it
    a gimme game for Cleveland. His KOD is even more lethal than mine.
61.396PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 20 1993 14:561
    TTom, what's the over/under on the HalWatch?
61.397Browns lose to Pats. AT HOME..TOOO FUNNY!!!!\QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Dec 20 1993 14:584
      He's probably in Californ I A......or so the excuse for not replying
    will be..
    
      Tim
61.398WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNumber 3 Looms over FenwayMon Dec 20 1993 15:018
    
    
        Well he was in the FFL conference bragging about his Fantasy team 
    "The Dawgs" so he hasn't got any excuse.
    
    
    
    Chap
61.399CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 20 1993 15:0111
Did you see the look on Vinny's face when he threw that final interception?

Priceless.....


'Saw


PS  Where's all those Pats fans who were complaining about Parcells.
    Heck, with a little bit o' luck, he'll do better his first year at
    NE than in his first year at NY......
61.400ELMAGO::BENBACAI survived TSFO, for now anyway!Mon Dec 20 1993 15:074
    I thought I read in here were the Browns were supposed to go 15 and 1......
    
    
    Wot happened?
61.401CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 20 1993 15:158
>    
>    Wot happened?
>

I think all that great equipment that they had that would get them 15-1 
must've broken or something....

Or maybe they didn't have enough coaches.....
61.402 :*) GENRAL::WADEPull!Mon Dec 20 1993 15:245
    
    	Congrats on your unmainly p-name wager win Roachy!  Kinda like
    	whoopin' your po frail ole granny in arm wrasslin!
    
    Claybone
61.403RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Dec 20 1993 15:258
    
    Re .401
    
  > Or maybe they didn't have enough coaches.....
    
    One too many, actually - name of Bellichek...
    
    Joe
61.404VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDDrew &gt; Vinny &gt; BernieMon Dec 20 1993 15:284
    	I'll get you in the playoffs Claybone (if the Donkeys make it) and
    I won't be skeert to give points!
    
    				/Don
61.405QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Dec 20 1993 15:375
      Only way the donks won't make the playoffs is if they lose to the
    'bucs thised weekend.  And if that happens,  they don't deserve to go, 
    even if they beat the faiders the week after.
    
      Tim
61.406GENRAL::WADEMon Dec 20 1993 15:405
    
    	Oh?  The Patsies are gonna play the Donks in the 'offs?
    	What year?
    
    Claybone
61.407MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 20 1993 16:0514
 >> Where's all those Pats fans who were complaining about Parcells.
 >> Heck, with a little bit o' luck, he'll do better his first year at
 >> NE than in his first year at NY......
    
    "All those Patriot fans"? How many are "All those"? One? Two? Good
    game yesterday. Nice to see them make the one or two plays that en-
    abled them to win that they haven't been making all season. What I
    don't understand is all of the griping about Bellichick. Vinnie looks
    like a *HUGE* improvement over Bernie. Better arm, better mobility,
    almost as experienced. Bernie had ample opportunity to get that team
    to the promised land when he had all of his skills and he couldn't 
    do it. To think that he could with his skills fading fast is just a
    pipe dream. 
61.408CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 20 1993 16:1913
>    "All those Patriot fans"? How many are "All those"? One? Two? Good
>    game yesterday. Nice to see them make the one or two plays that en-


All those, modified by the words "who were complaining".  Even if it
was only one, it could still be an "all those"....


I don't know what I enjoyed more -- seeing New England win, or Cleveland
lose.

But hey, folks, that logo has GOT to go......

61.409RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Dec 20 1993 16:2938
    
  >  What I don't understand is all of the griping about Bellichick.
  >  Vinnie looks like a *HUGE* improvement over Bernie. Better arm,
  >  better mobility, almost as experienced. Bernie had ample opportunity
  >  to get that team to the promised land when he had all of his skills
  >  and he couldn't do it. To think that he could with his skills fading
  >  fast is just a pipe dream.
    
    The griping about Bellichek centers around the fact that in spite of
    having little offensive experience he, in mid season, waived the
    Browns best available quarterback (Kosar) because Kosar's skills
    didn't fit Bellichek's offense.  OK, a lot of it stems from Kosar's
    hero status in Cleveland as well, to be honest, but that doesn't
    diminish the meaning of the former.
    
    To say that Testaverde is a significantly better quarterback than
    Kosar is quite a stretch.  Testaverde does have a better arm, and
    better mobility, true.  "Experience" doesn't score points, so we'll
    ignore that.  Kosar is more accurate and reads defenses better.
    I'd take Kosar, but I could see someone preferring Testaverde.
    Be interesting to see the offensive pts/quarter divided between
    the two - I suspect they are about even, which would suggest that
    Kosar (who makes fewer mistakes) would be the better choice.
    
    All of which suggests, perhaps, benching Kosar to play Testaverde. 
    This happened, and while benching Kosar didn't make most Browns fans
    happy, there were few calls for Bellichek's head on a platter.
    When Testaverde went down, and Kosar was released, so that _Todd
    Philcox_ could start, that's when the problem started.  The team
    has since dropped from 5-3 to 6-8.  If you're a fan of the team,
    who are you going to blame?
    
    And while the Browns never got to the Super Bowl w/ Kosar, it's
    hardly his fault.  I'm not convinced he could _lead_ the Browns to
    the Super Bowl now, but I think he would have been a whole lot more
    likely to _guide_ them there than Testaverde.
    
    Joe                                           
61.410GENRAL::WADEMon Dec 20 1993 16:556
    
    	It's not Bernie's fault they never went to the Super Bowl.
    	It's John Elway's and Ernest Byner's!  :*)  Or was that
    	Kevin Mack.  I fergit.....
    
    Claybone
61.411PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 20 1993 16:572
    Parcells finally benched his kicker and got a new one.  If he had done
    that earlier in the season we might have been lookin' at a few more Ws.
61.412CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 20 1993 16:596
>
>    Parcells finally benched his kicker and got a new one.  If he had done
>    that earlier in the season we might have been lookin' at a few more Ws.
>

He had to wait till a good one was available....8^)
61.413HalWatch is onQUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Dec 20 1993 17:526
      Kosar's experience vs Testies?  Hasn't Binny been in the NFL for 6-7
    years?  How much experience does he need?  Kosar has only 1-2 years
    more than Binny....
    
    
     Tim
61.414Bill had to be police excorted from the StadiumSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRDrew &gt; Vinny &gt; BernieMon Dec 20 1993 18:5323
    
    	Well guys, I was in here first thing this morning and wrote a
    lenthy note only to have it go into the land of nowhere...network path
    lost....depressing.  However, I'm not going to say a whole lot here.
    
    	I think the officiating stank yesterday.  Two catches that were
    called good but were both out of bounds.  Then the fumble in the last
    two minutes that wasn't called.  Long shot for the Browns but yet a
    shot.
    
    	Vinny stank!  Lose a game because of INT's...didn't I say something
    about this before?  I can't stand it!  
    
    	The Browns gave the Pats this game.  A fumble at the 10 and an INT
    in the endzone.  What was Vinny looking at???  Stupid!  Yea, Bills
    right.  NOT!
    
    	When will Bill be dumped???
    
    	Merry X-mas Pats!
    
    
    	GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
61.415VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDDrew &gt; Vinny &gt; BernieMon Dec 20 1993 20:085
    	Tell ya what Hal, it being Christmas and all and you being a main
    and all by betting the line and not trying to sandbag me, you can lose
    the P-Name after Wednesday.
    
    				/Don
61.416where have all the fans gone?SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRDrew &gt; Vinny &gt; BernieTue Dec 21 1993 10:508
    
    	Gee thanks Don.....since I'm not going to be here after today....
    that sounds like a good deal.  I won't be back till next year.
    
    I wanted to note one other thing about the game Sunday...only 42,000
    fans showed up for the game.  Does that tell you something?
    
    		Woof!
61.417PTOVAX::JACOBTue Dec 21 1993 18:489
    
    >>I wanted to note one other thing about the game Sunday...only 42,000
    >>fans showed up for the game.  Does that tell you something?
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    That the cumulative IQ of the stadium was only 38 Sunday.
    
    JaKe
    
61.418A change for the good!....FINALLY!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Wed Jan 19 1994 15:117
    
    	The Cleveland Browns actually hired an offensive coordinator.
    	The running back coach has been promoted.
    
    	Hmmmm, I wonder why?
    
    	WOOF!
61.419QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyWed Jan 19 1994 19:421
      Bernie to come back? (-)
61.420tRADESUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Wed Feb 02 1994 15:237
    
    	Word out of Cleveland is that the Browns are trying to work a deal
    	that will give them the #1 rated QB in the nation in this years
    	comming draft.  Who will it be?
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.421did Bernie go back to college?FRETZ::HEISERgimme a dollar or gimme 50 centsWed Feb 02 1994 15:281
    
61.422SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Wed Feb 02 1994 15:452
    
    Only if Bill went back to the Giants....
61.423CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 16:123
Belichick in Cleveland, Pardee in Washington, Handley in NY.....

All prime examples of the Peter Principle in action.
61.424METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballWed Feb 02 1994 16:313
Pardee in Washington?? Pettibohn in Washington, Pardee in Houston.

The Crazy Met
61.425CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 16:323
Right.

I get them mixed up all the time....8^)
61.426Pardee at Washington?CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Wed Feb 02 1994 17:003
I thought that Pardee did coach the Skins at one time.

Jerry
61.427CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 17:1014
>                           -< Pardee at Washington? >-
>
>I thought that Pardee did coach the Skins at one time.

I thought he might have played for them, but now I'm thinking it was
the Rams.

Pettibone played for them (db?) didn't he?


I KNEW I shoulda stayed away from the brown acid.....


'Saw
61.428Bernie gets a ring...TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Wed Feb 02 1994 17:161
'bout the only thing good about sunday's game...
61.429Coming into LosAngeles, bringin'in a coupla keysCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Feb 02 1994 17:206
    Ah believes Pardee did coach the Skins at one point. He definitely
    played for the Rams. And Eliot from Harvard just tol' me that the
    brown acid told him that Pettibone played mostly for the Bears, no??
    
    MikeL
    
61.430Leave Cleve and get the ring.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Thu Feb 03 1994 10:4515
    
    	I thought it was great that Bernie got to get a snap off in the 
    	game.  His name will go down in history.....
    
    		RUSHING - KOSAR 1 Attemp for (-1) yard
    
    	Someone said he probably got some extra cash for the snap.
    
    	I was really surprised that Bernie didn't get a shot at QB in the
    	second half seeing how bad Troy was.  Probably have to thank 
    	Washington for that.
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.431CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 03 1994 11:546
>    	I was really surprised that Bernie didn't get a shot at QB in the
>    	second half seeing how bad Troy was.  Probably have to thank 
>    	Washington for that.
    
You truly are joking, right, Hal?    

61.432How's this?CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Thu Feb 03 1994 12:3221
>>            <<< Note 61.430 by SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR "BILL MUST GO!" >>>
>>                       -< Leave Cleve and get the ring. >-

>>    	I was really surprised that Bernie didn't get a shot at QB in the
>>    	second half seeing how bad Troy was.  Probably have to thank 
>>    	Washington for that.
    
I let the first remark that Hal made about "how bad Aikman looked" go.
But the guy just keeps coming back for more.

So, in Hal's honor, I would like to introduce a new term.  I'll TM
it later.  From now on, when Hal displays such leaps of illogic as
demonstrated here, I will refer to it as a 



	Halapropism

Thank you,

Jerry
61.433Or "halaprop" for short (accepted usage). Rollward!NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 03 1994 12:351
    
61.434TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Thu Feb 03 1994 12:351
Rollin' Jerry!
61.435CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 03 1994 12:373
yeah, you've got me rolling.....

TM that baby.....
61.436CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Feb 03 1994 12:4216
    
    
    	Yabbut don't forget,
    
    
    
    hth
    
    
    
    	Hal_tried_Hard
    
    
    ;^)
    
    
61.437FRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Thu Feb 03 1994 14:123
    Ankle-biting Bernie wishes he was half the QB Aikman is.
    
    Hize (not a cowgirl fan)
61.438Where will he go...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Thu Feb 03 1994 15:1324
    
    	You still have to give Bernie some credit though.  He did win a
    	couple of games durring the season for Dallas and also played
    	a big part in the win against the 49ers.
    
    	The big question is where will he go this next year?????
    
    	Let me throw a couple of teams up...
    
    		Cleveland
    		Houston
    		Jets
    		Miami (If Marino don't come back)
    		KC  (no way with Marty there)
                New Orleans
    		Rams
    		Bears
    		
    	are there any others?  Maybe we should have a contest.
    
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.439METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballThu Feb 03 1994 15:165
re: Jets,Oilers - not if he wants to start.

The Crazy Met

61.44038346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 03 1994 15:236
61.441imagine Barry Sanders with a line like thatFRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Thu Feb 03 1994 15:301
    not to mention the 'Boys offensive line.
61.442KosarROCK::MURPHYLoosiersThu Feb 03 1994 15:347
    Bernie - what I heard was Bears, Chargers, Bucs.
    
    I think Saints should give it a shot. Could be a quality QB away from
    trying to go to the SB.
    
    Murph
    
61.443DYPSS1::ROPERCan't Buy Me LoveThu Feb 03 1994 15:384
    Hal, don't be surprised if Bernie ends up in Washington with Norv
    Turner.  They apparently have talked about that possibility.
    
    - Rope
61.444METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballThu Feb 03 1994 15:528
> I think Saints should give it a shot. Could be a quality QB away from
> trying to go to the SB.

then why would they want Bernie? Here is a guy who always came up short
in a championship game. I mean come on, Elway the chokester was the QB
that beat 'em.

The Crazy Met
61.445CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Thu Feb 03 1994 15:5613
>>  <<< Note 61.444 by METSNY::francus "Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football" >>>

>>then why would they want Bernie? Here is a guy who always came up short
>>in a championship game. I mean come on, Elway the chokester was the QB
>>that beat 'em.

Aren't you being a bit unfair to Bernie on this?  As I recall, Denver
won one game with "the drive".  If anyone choked, it was the Browns'
defense.  The other game was lost on a fumble inside the 5 yard line.
That doesn't sound like a choke job on Bernie's part.  He had them
in position to win late in the game.

Jerry
61.446some people...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Thu Feb 03 1994 16:365
    
    	Thanks Jerry!
    
    
    	GRRRRRRRRR
61.447gonna root for the PatsTNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Thu Feb 03 1994 17:597
Hey Hal,
Are the Browns' faithful still hollerin' for Belichek's head
or has the ardour cooled?
Is Modell still committed to that idjit?
And did they really hire an offensive coordinator?

dr.a
61.448Lack_QB is not the main problem in N'AwlinsCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Feb 03 1994 18:286
    Why would Bernie want the 'aints?  Hail as long as Mora is there,
    this team will continue to underachieve, no matter who the QB
    is.
    
    MikeL
    
61.449SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Fri Feb 04 1994 10:3913
    
    	Yes, the Browns promoted the runningbacks coach to that of
    offensive coordinator.  Ozzie is still the receivers coach and talk is
    that Kevin Mack may be hired in the offseason to be the runningback
    coach.
    	Talk in Cleveland has calmed down a little.  Bill says the team has
    gotten better no mater what happened the last 3/4ths of last season.
    Art is committed to Bill all the way.  Both say the Browns will make
    the playoffs next year.
    	Browns Newspaper has all the stats with and without Bernie.
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.450PTOVAX::JACOBFri Feb 04 1994 19:0122
    
    >>	Talk in Cleveland has calmed down a little.  Bill says the team has
    >>gotten better no mater what happened the last 3/4ths of last season.
    
    I cain see if it was only 1/4 of the season that they faltered, but
    didn't they go something like 2-8 or 3-7 over the lasted 10 games???? 
    that's bad, in anybody's(except Pats fans) book.
    
    >>Art is committed to Bill all the way.  Both say the Browns will make
    >>the playoffs next year.
    
    Now there's reason to go bet the mortgage on the 'Spots, eh???? 
    "Specially with Bill and Art's track records so far.  What happens
    nexted year, is Bill going to cut the whole defensive line if they
    don't put out fer a game or three????
    
    BTW, the STEELERS signed some coach from the 'SPots to coach their
    defensive line nexted year, any scoop on this guy(cain't even remember
    his name.)
    
    JaKe
    
61.451tranquil-izerMSDOA::HYMESChief cook and bottle washerFri Feb 11 1994 15:2710
    Bumped into an old college friend two weeks ago.  She is the
    daughter of Gary Tranquil - who had been the Browns quarterback
    coach.
    
    He just recently quit to take a job at VA Tech.  The story 
    I got was that several coaches were now quietly leaving cuz they
    don't exactly get along with Bellicek (sp?). 
    
    Just what I heard,
    Pat
61.452Not too many people are able to get along with himSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Wed Feb 16 1994 11:455
    Hmmmmm, I wonder why???
    
    
    		Woof!
    
61.453How about this...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Mar 28 1994 11:449
    
    	Since I did so well on predicting the Basketball winners...
    
    
    		I predict that the CLEVELAND BROWNS will make it to 
    			the playoffs this year.
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.454new QB in townSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Mar 31 1994 11:337
    
    	Browns sign Tom Tupa as quarterback.  Anyone got any stats on this
    	guy?  Where did he come from?
    
    	
    
    	Woof!
61.455Buckeyed PeaGENRAL::WADESo, what's on your alleged mind?Thu Mar 31 1994 14:584
    
    	I'm surprised at you Hal.  He's an Ohio State grad...
    
    Claybone
61.456FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 15:211
    He was drafted by the Cardinals and only played here a couple seasons.
61.457SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dThu Mar 31 1994 16:426
    
    He's a lousy backup, at least he provewd that when Timmmy Rosenbach
    went down.  Of course, with all the coaches the Browns have, he'll
    surely improve.
    
    boC
61.458HANNAH::ASHElike sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his livesThu Mar 31 1994 19:542
    He's a QB AND a punter...
    
61.459FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 20:223
    > He's a QB AND a punter...
    
    i.e., Danny White with a lot less talent.
61.460ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetThu Mar 31 1994 22:574
    
    FWIW, he was signed to be a punter, not a qb (except in emergencies).
    
    Joe
61.461O-H-I-OSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Apr 01 1994 11:3610
    
    	Interesting...signed to be a punter...???  Looks like they are 
    trying to keep the Ohio faithfull rooting for the team.  Tupa...
    Ohio State....Yea, I remember....I think.  I seem to remember him
    playing in a bowl game.....a bad one.  I really don't thimk passing
    will be the name of the game in Cleveland this year.  I look for the 
    Browns to run...run...run....and evidently punt.
    
    	Grrrrrrrr
    
61.462MKFSA::LONGThat's my story and I'm stickin' to it!Fri Apr 01 1994 12:415
	Sure he wasn't on the team last year?  The paper I read said the
	Browns 're-signed' him.


	billl
61.463ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetMon Apr 04 1994 16:436
    
    Re .462
    
    He was the emergency backup QB for the last few games last year.
    
    Joe
61.464SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindWed Apr 06 1994 11:124
    Heard he's from a very rich family.  They make some sort of food
    storage containers.  Tupaware, I think it's called.
    
    Lee
61.465Bernie signs ...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Apr 14 1994 11:312
    
    	Bernie Kosar is now a Miami backup...
61.466ELMAGO::BENBACADon'tDoTheCrimeIfYouCan'tDoTheTime!Tue Apr 26 1994 15:052
     Yea, he wanna be there when JJ takes over the head coaching job and
    Dan retires.  :-)
61.46730 yrs a browns fanBSS::J_VANMETERFri May 06 1994 14:252
    just read in the paper that Ernest "fumble the ball" Byner has just
    signed with my Browns.  Why?????!!!!!!
61.468QUASER::JACKSONTAThe Men go Fishing!Fri May 06 1994 14:345
      Because the Browns don't have a good RB?  Maybe he will FUMBLE
    against Denver again this year.  The dawgs come to pile it hi this
    year.
    
      Tim
61.469BETTER YEARSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue May 10 1994 15:2810
    
    	Yes, the Browns have signed Byner, they are also looking to sign
    the Washington QB as backup.  The Browns are expected to make the
    playoffs this year with the recent signings.  Carl Banks will be a 
    Brown soon.  Mike Johnson has signed with detroit.  Pepper Johnson and
    Jerry Ball are still unsigned free agents.  Langman and Alexander will
    surely improve the team this year.
    
    
    	WOOF
61.470CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels and Raw BeefTue May 10 1994 16:1432
>    	Yes, the Browns have signed Byner, 

A stiff.


>they are also looking to sign the Washington QB as backup.  


Another stiff.



>The Browns are expected to make the
>    playoffs this year with the recent signings.  

Surely you jest.



>Carl Banks will be a  Brown soon.  

A doubly big stiff.  Washed up.


>    surely improve the team this year.
    
Ought to take this one to open mike night.....


'Saw


61.471PTOVAX::JACOBTue May 10 1994 19:3911
    
>>The Browns are expected to make the
>>    playoffs this year with the recent signings.  
    
    And last year, and the year before that, and the year before that, with
    all the assistants they had, and....you get the picture.
    
    HAL, talk to us about it in January.
    
    JaKe
    
61.472Rypien a BrownHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderTue May 10 1994 19:577
Just heard: Rypien has signed with the Browns to backup Vinnie. That's
along way from Super Bowl MVP, $3M salary, etc.

Maybe the Browns are planning on Vinnie not getting it done and they
wanted another chance at losing...

TTom
61.473CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels and Raw BeefTue May 10 1994 20:249
|Just heard: Rypien has signed with the Browns to backup Vinnie. That's
|along way from Super Bowl MVP, $3M salary, etc.
|
|Maybe the Browns are planning on Vinnie not getting it done and they
|wanted another chance at losing...



If these two guys were testicles, you'd never make a baby with them.....
61.474DAWG DAY AFTERNOONBSS::J_VANMETERTue May 10 1994 21:4417
    Hal:
    
     I'm a lowly "Browns" fan in Bronco land.  It has been hard to hold my
    head up and chear for them at times.  But,  I always hang there.  I
    feel the Browns had a alot of EGO talent, and BB had to act fast to get
    rid of his biggest ego; that being Bernie.  Bernie was holding the team
    down with his constant whining.  I can't make a prediction for this
    year except that I feel a 9-7 record will win the Central Div.
    
    Hang in there Hal.
    Maybe "just" Maybe
    We will win a few games and make the playoffs.
    I pray that the butheads that note in to knock the Browns "Eat" alot of
    crow this year.
    
    DO IT DAWGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
61.475QUASER::JACKSONTAThe Men go Fishing!Tue May 10 1994 22:386
    re-1
    
      You and Hal won't get along.  You dogged Bernie his hero (-).
    
    
      Tim
61.476CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels and Raw BeefWed May 11 1994 12:358
Ha!

That was a classic.

Yeah, Hal and Bernie are buddies....  (Or was that RCASO and Tony Eason?)


'Saw
61.477ROCK::HUBERCleveland Crunch - 1994 NPSL ChampionsWed May 11 1994 13:1313
    
    Re .474
    
>    I feel the Browns had a alot of EGO talent, and BB had to act fast to get
>    rid of his biggest ego; that being Bernie.  Bernie was holding the team
>    down with his constant whining.
    
    Huh?  Bernie isn't a great quarterback; at this point in his career
    he could probably still start, but will make an excellent backup IMHO.
    But Bernie as the biggest ego on the Browns?  Certainly not when
    compared to Belichek, or Perry, or Ball, or...
    
    Joe
61.478TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinWed May 11 1994 14:187
    
    
    
    	Did I hear a report that Mark Rypian signed with the Browns???
    
    JimH
    
61.479GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsWed May 11 1994 15:014
    
    	What other kind of Browns fan is there other than "lowly"?
    
    Claybone
61.480CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels and Raw BeefWed May 11 1994 16:453
>    	What other kind of Browns fan is there other than "lowly"?
    
Lead me not into temptation......
61.481Browns fans are best fansBSS::J_VANMETERWed May 11 1994 21:5710
    RE: 61.479
    
    Well; I can understand your statement.  The Browns have really sucked
    recently.  But when I say "lowly" it is only implying that the team I
    chose to support some 30 years ago cant seem to make it over the hump,
    my frustration is apparent.  Living in Colorado hasnt made being a 
    Browns fan any easier for obvious reason ie: F__k the Broncos!!!
    All "true" Browns fans have the mindset that if your not a Browns fan
    you just dont know football!!
    
61.482PTOVAX::JACOBWhat partof 'NO' didja misunderstand??Wed May 11 1994 22:179
    
    >>All "true" Browns fans have the mindset that if your not a Browns fan
    >>you just dont know football!!
    
    And all REAL football fans KNOW that if you're a Brown(spot)s(tm) fan,
    you just DON'T know football.
    
    JaKe
    
61.483PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandThu May 12 1994 03:2817
>>                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
>>                                  -< SPORTS >-
>>================================================================================
>>Note 61.481                 CLEVELAND BROWNS 'DAWGS'                  481 of 482
                                               ^^^^^^
    
    Hey Hal, 
    
    Why don't they change this to something more fitting, like maybe
    
    "Rabid Chihuahuas"...ya know, cause they make a lot of noise, can't
    hurt a flea, and piss all over the place when you scare them.  yep,
    sounds like the Brown(spot)s(tm) and their inhabitants of the pig pound
    to me!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.484GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsThu May 12 1994 14:057
    
    re .481.
    
    	Hey, I can understand why you feel that way about the Broncos.
    	And, I love it.
    
    Claybone
61.485Indians are getting scalped!BSS::J_VANMETERThu May 12 1994 15:284
    Would somebody tell me what is wrong with the Indians, thay have lost 9
    of 10 and 4 in a row.  I would like intelligent responses, not smart
    as* ones.
    
61.486moderator interventionHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 12 1994 15:304
I, for one, find .485 offensive on the grounds that the noter is trying
to stifle a joke.

TTom
61.487CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeThu May 12 1994 15:3121
>    Would somebody tell me what is wrong with the Indians, thay have lost 9
>    of 10 and 4 in a row.  I would like intelligent responses, not smart
>    as* ones.


In 9 out of 10 games and 4 in a row, they've scored less runs than their
opponents.

Places to check:

		a) shitty pitching
		b) shitty hitting
		c) shitty fielding


Remember to post your findings here for all of our mutual edification....


'Saw
    

61.488familiarHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 12 1994 15:328
>		a) shitty pitching
>		b) shitty hitting
>		c) shitty fielding

This reminds me of "Good Morning Vietnam" when Robin Williams is doing
the weather and keeps referring to it as "shitty".

TTom
61.489They've got the guys with the bats; it just hasn't clickedNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu May 12 1994 15:4313
    
    'Saw's smartass response pretty much nailed it (actually, I don't know
    if the defense has been all that bad or not, but it has slipped since
    around the time Vizquel got hurt).  The Indians' pitching is near the
    bottom of the league, which should surprise absolutely no one
    (shockingly, that spring training-touted miraculous Jack Morris
    comeback proved to be a fraud), but unexpectedly amidst the juiced-ball
    theories that have raised everybody's boats, the Indians' offense has
    been taking on water so far.  I don't expect the mediocre offensive
    production to continue, though.
    
    glenn
    
61.490CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeThu May 12 1994 17:136
>    'Saw's smartass response pretty much nailed it (actually, I don't know
>    if the defense has been all that bad or not, but it has slipped since

Was not smartass.....8^)

I just gave a very *succinct* reason why they're doing so shitty....8^)
61.491PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu May 12 1994 17:234
61.492CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeThu May 12 1994 17:3516
61.493Cleveland is ClevelandBSS::J_VANMETERThu May 12 1994 17:531
    ooops,,  I forgot.   sorry bout that...
61.494QUASER::JACKSONTAThe Men go Fishing!Thu May 12 1994 19:186
      Well theres one Clevland fan that admits they were wrong.
    
    
      The draft has happened and no Hal predictions?
    
      Tim
61.495Browns networkBSS::J_VANMETERThu May 12 1994 19:256
    I was somewhat pleased with the draft.  I think the Browns defense will
    be strong.  The offense will suck once again ie; no running game, no
    offensive line.  Metcalf will be the only offensive productivity.  The
    only hope the offense has is to concentrate on the running game, which
    would open up the passing game.  I forsee a 8-8 season. and a wild card
    spot.
61.496PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandThu May 12 1994 19:429
    
    
    >>Would somebody tell me what is wrong with the Indians, thay have lost 9
    >>of 10 and 4 in a row.
    
    They woke up and fell out of the tree they been living in so far.
    
    JaKe
    
61.497DZIGN::ROBICHAUDPoliticallyCorrectScrabbleFri May 13 1994 11:474
    	How many assistant coaches do the Indians have?  That's the
    key to a successful season.
    
    				/Don
61.498Browns rule!!!!BSS::J_VANMETERFri May 13 1994 14:103
    Now wait a minute I was reprimanded for noting a Indians topic in the
    Browns note file.   Where is the moderater on this one?!
    But the Indians lost again.  Pitching could'nt throw a fit!!!!
61.499and in the wrong note to boot!GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsFri May 13 1994 14:126
    
    	Did anybody else find it somewhat amusing that a Browns fan
    	asked for an intelligent response (like they would understand
    	it if somebody entered it)?  :*)
    
    Claybone
61.500;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYFri May 13 1994 14:211
    
61.501Browns rule....!BSS::J_VANMETERFri May 13 1994 14:497
    Hey! Claybone"Head":
     
         I requested intelligent responses in hopes the Anti-Browns folks
    could excercise there already dead brains, I knew you folks could'nt
    reply.  You sir only proved my thoery.
    
                                         Thank you for being stupid!!!!!
61.502Browns fans eat dogbones (-)QUASER::JACKSONTAThe Men go Fishing!Fri May 13 1994 15:493
      Alright!! Spots/Broncos fan rivalry has started, and no Hal!
    
      Tim
61.503Dawg bones are MMM-MMM Goooood!!BSS::J_VANMETERFri May 13 1994 17:116
    re: 502
    
    Bronco fans eat horse turds and Elway nuggets!!!
    
    Where is Hal?! I need help here!!!!
    
61.504vote of confidenceHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderFri May 13 1994 17:125
>    Bronco fans eat horse turds and Elway nuggets!!!

Hey, you're doin fine.

TTom
61.505GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsFri May 13 1994 20:0914
>         I requested intelligent responses in hopes the Anti-Browns folks
>    could excercise there already dead brains, I knew you folks could'nt
>    reply.  You sir only proved my thoery.
    
>                                         Thank you for being stupid!!!!!


	So, you requested replies from people you knew "could'nt" reply.
	Hmmmm....  

	I guess I must be stupid cuz I can't follow the logic behind
	your "thoery".  

Claybone
61.506Browns 3 Denver 1BSS::J_VANMETERFri May 13 1994 20:515
    So what my right brain is quicker than my left brain,  thus the letters
    were transposed.  My point remains the same.  Accidental spelling of
    theory is not a topic builder.  Your inept ability to use your head for
    something other than a paper weight is.  It sure is windy in Colorado
    Springs today.  I think it is because "Denver" SUCKS!!!!!!!
61.507AFC championship Denver 3 Clev 0!QUASER::JACKSONTAThe Men go Fishing!Fri May 13 1994 21:434
      If the Broncos suck,  then how come they own the Browns?  I think the
    Browns have beaten the Broncos once in the last 10 tries.
    
      Tim
61.508HUMBLEDBSS::J_VANMETERFri May 13 1994 21:597
    re: 507
    
    2 shay!!  The actual number is 2 wins, which admittedly is dismal and
    basis for my hatred toward the donkeys.  Sometimes it seems
    they(brocos) have a lepricon stuck up thier ass.  But we know the
    Broncos will at least two games against the raiders.  We have thier
    number.  Strange game football!     Where is HAL!!!!!!!!!!?????????
61.509HUMBLED X 2BSS::J_VANMETERFri May 13 1994 22:039
    RE: 508
    
    CORRECTIONS:
    
    (broncos instead of brocos)
    I meant to say lose two games against the Raiders.
    
    thank you
    
61.510You made Hal mad degrading Kosar(-)QUASER::JACKSONTAThe Men go Fishing!Sat May 14 1994 03:247
      Try 3.  The last 3x the Broncos went to the loser bowl,  they beat
    the Brownies to get there.
    
    
      And now your a faider fan?
    
      Tim
61.511HANNAH::ASHEHome of the driveby noter...Mon May 16 1994 13:532
    Not another how many Super Bowl discussion...
    
61.512HAL HUNTBSS::J_VANMETERMon May 16 1994 14:563
    Does anyone know where HAL is???  Would like his opinion on this years
    draft and free agent signings thus far!!!!!
    
61.513CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeMon May 16 1994 15:2821
>
>    Does anyone know where HAL is???  Would like his opinion on this years
>    draft and free agent signings thus far!!!!!
>    

Let me save you some time.  

Dig back through some old notes, and find Hal's opinion on previous
draft and free agent signings.  Substitute this years names.  Put a current
time-stamp on it.   Then you'll have Hal's opinion on this year's draft
and free agent signings.

Follow it up with one of Hal's patented notes that says that the Browns
will go 13-3 or 14-2 and you'll pretty much know everything that Hal
has to say on the subject....


hth,
'Saw


61.514GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsMon May 16 1994 17:215
    
    	Watch out 'Saw.  He'll ask for a reply from you (previously
    	knowing you can't reply) and then call YOU stupid.
    
    Claybone
61.515CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeMon May 16 1994 17:418
>    
>    	Watch out 'Saw.  He'll ask for a reply from you (previously
>    	knowing you can't reply) and then call YOU stupid.
    
Yabbut Claybone, just the phrase "Browns fan" makes it all so clear....


'Saw
61.516Boys in a mans worldBSS::J_VANMETERMon May 16 1994 18:484
    re:514
    
    Grow up Clay"bonehead"!!!!!
    
61.517Maybe we found HALTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Mon May 16 1994 18:503
|   Grow up Clay"bonehead"!!!!!
 
Uhh, has anyone seen this guy and HAL in the same place...
61.518MSBCS::BRYDIETCM - World's Greatest SandbaggerMon May 16 1994 18:556
    
      SPORTS needs more folks like Van Meter. This trend towards 
     thoughtful discussion, a lack of flame wars and proper spelling
     and punctuation would cause several of our long since departed
     SPORTSnoters to spin in their electronic graves. I haven't used 
     my SPORTSnotes decoder ring in over six months.
61.519CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeMon May 16 1994 19:1714
>                           -< Boys in a mans world >-
>
>    re:514
>    
>    Grow up Clay"bonehead"!!!!!

Hey, them's fighting words.

Nobody disses my friend Claybone!


'Saw
    

61.520OLD1S::SYSTEMMon May 16 1994 19:1810
	re 517

  We were never allowed to go to place like Cleveland. Now I see why!!


 Cadzilla2

  I did get sent to a GE site there once during days as HDA Man, longest weekend
in recorded history. 
61.521Pissing People off!! I'm good at it. YES!!!!BSS::J_VANMETERMon May 16 1994 19:339
    re: 518
    
    Thank you!  I'am happy I could entertain you!  
    
    Still looking for HAL!!
    
    This is the Browns note file.  So, GO DAWGS!!!!
    
    
61.522PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandMon May 16 1994 19:437
    Any time a Clevescum team goes into a slide, ala the Injuns
    performance(or lack thereof lasted week), HAL distappears.
    
    Clevescum SUCKS!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.523the powers of the Universal Decoder RingFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixMon May 16 1994 19:561
    Tommy, RCASO wasn't a Browns fan was he?
61.524GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsMon May 16 1994 20:104
    
    	I guess he showed me.
    
    Claybone
61.525Indians on a come back roll!!!BSS::J_VANMETERMon May 16 1994 20:477
    Poor HAL!!!!
    
    Injuns win three in a row and y'all still pick on 'em.
    
    tisk tisk...
    
    
61.526Cleveland is Beautiful!!!!BSS::J_VANMETERMon May 16 1994 20:5612
    re: 520
    
    One must understand Cleveland in order to have a good time there.
    
    The first rule of thumb is that a NERD could'nt possibly have a good
    time in Cleveland.  Too blue collar..   If a Nerd such as yourself 
    visits Cleveland with the attitude that it sucks, then it is no wonder
    you could'nt get laid......
    
    Next time you visit beautiful Cleveland try kissing a little as*,
    such as mine.......
    
61.527GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsMon May 16 1994 20:575
    
    	Ha!  Jake, I think your "set hidden" record is in serious
    	trouble.
    
    Claybone
61.528PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandMon May 16 1994 21:0714
    
    >>Next time you visit beautiful Cleveland try kissing a little as*,
    >>such as mine.......
    
    
    That's the problems with you Clevescumites, too many guys wanting to
    kiss each others butts!!!!
    
    I spent a week there one night!!!!
    
    Never again!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.529Cleveland tourist center!!BSS::J_VANMETERMon May 16 1994 21:3413
    re:528
    
    Golly Jake:
    
    I only meant that when you visit Cleveland again and you ask me nicely
    that I would give you a couple of phone numbers to help you have a good
    time.  Might even arrange going to a Browns or Indians game while your
    there.  BOY! touchy touchy!
    
    GOSH this is fun!
    
    Where the HELL is HAL!!!
    
61.530PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandMon May 16 1994 21:377
    
    >>Where the HELL is HAL!!!
    
    Realigning his satelite dish to see Bernice's every move this year!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.531Bernie reality!!!!BSS::J_VANMETERMon May 16 1994 22:0415
    I hate to disappoint a fellow Browns fan, but I really feel Bernie was
    and is grossly over-rated.  First; thinking back to the receivers he
    had to throw to, they were great! ie: Slaughter, Langhorne, and
    Brennan.  All Bernie had to do was to get the ball in the general
    direction and these guys would come down with it, that is if it wasnt
    knocked down at the line of scrimmage.  I'am more upset about the loss of
    the receivers than I'am the loss of Bernie.  I wish I knew how many
    passes Bernie had knocked down at the line of scrimmage, it has to be
    a NFL record.  A true Browns fan would recognize that Bernie had a
    staff that made him look good.  I was convinced for awhile.  I saw the
    light, I feel Bill B. will get the job done.   We will be in the
    playoffs this year!!
    
    Go DAWGS!!!   WOOF!!!   WOOF!!!
    
61.532PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandMon May 16 1994 23:0514
    re.531
    Good QB's and good receivers go hand in hand.
    
    No qb becomes GREAT without better than average receivers, and visa
    versa.
    
    Take the STEELERS last year(please)...O'Donnell had a good year, but
    would've had a GREAT year had the receivers not been dropping passes at
    almost the same rate at which they caught them.
    
    But, I think yer right, BERNICE SUCKS!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.533Take it easy...DAWGS *WILL* be in the playoffs!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue May 17 1994 11:4064
    
    	Enough is enough!!!!!
    
    	Why blame Bernie for the teams failure the last few years???  There
    	was obviously many other problems with the team.  For one, how can
    	anyone throw a pass with the defense comming at you like they had
    	an invitation?  For two, as was said earlier, receivers, the only
    	one the Browns have had is Jackson and he had a problem holding 
    	onto the ball when he first joined the club.  Then there was the
    	running game problem, can't blame the running backs, what happened
    	to the blocking???  Then last but not least, there was the play
    	calling.  This is the reason Bernie got the boot, he was fed up
    	with the play calls and deceided to call his own...not at the line,
    	but in the huddle....Remember???  
    
    	BB has had his problems but I will have to say he has made some 
    	good draft choices over the years with the exception of Ed King.
    	Lots better drafter than Marty could have ever thought of being!
    
    	This years draft.....I think I already wrote a note on this....
    	in one word....OUTSTANDING!  I think they lucked out with the 
    	cornerback they got and then to get the widereceiver at the end
    	of the first round.  
    
    	I read an artical about JJ of Dallas screwing up a trade with Alvin
    	Harper for the Browns #9 pick.  It worked out better for the
    	Browns!
    
    	The Browns also picked up one great guy through free agency this 
    	year....can't remember his name though, it was a tight end...a
    	blocking tight end!  We really needed that!!!  Look for a lots
    	better running game with it in turn opening up the passing game.
    	
    	The defense will surely be improved but with the loss of Mike
    	Johnson one can only hope the youngsters on the team can pick up
    	the slack.  From what I see of the Browns defense, the other guys
    	on the team could surely fill in nicely.  The Browns also picked
    	up two other cornerbacks in free agency.  Do you think the Browns
    	had a problem last year covering receivers???  You bet!  Not this
    	year though.  Lets just hope the Browns can sign Jerry Ball, who
    	really wants to play for the DAWGS.  Also lets hope that Pepper
    	Johnson signs.  If the Browns do sign these guys, there will be 
    	no question they will make the playoffs this year.
    
    	The Oilers have surely taken a turn for the worse and the Bengles
    	have gotten better but not good enough to contend.  The Squeelers
    	will be the only problem.  I think the Browns have to win the 
    	division to make the playoffs this year.  I don't believe they can
    	get a wild card spot...I would be surprised.  
    
    	Nice to have another Browns fan in this note.  But HEY!!!!  DON'T
    	BLAME BERNIE!!!	 He sent me another birthday card this year!
    
    	I'll have to bring in my latest BNI and tell you whats being said
    	in the Rock n Roll capital of the world.
    
    		LIVE BABY LIVE
    
    
    	Go DAWGS!!!
    
    		WOOF!	WOOF!	WOOF!
    
    
61.534CNTROL::CHILDSBrillant, Charming and NastyTue May 17 1994 12:215
 that couldn't have been Hal, he actually said something nice about the
 Steelers........

 ;^)
61.535TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue May 17 1994 12:591
Oh, thank God HAL's back...
61.536OLD1S::SYSTEMTue May 17 1994 14:4512
re 526:

  Well I've been called a lot of things but never a NERD!!. Anytime I spend two
night looking for action and the hotel has the only place around, I consider the
place to be a dump. I came from Ford in Detroit before going to GE in Cleveland
and had a better time. The funniest thing about it, was their claim as the Rock
n Roll capitol of the world. What a joke!!!   If you and Hal are representative
of the Cleveland culture, I see were it gets it;s fame.


 Cadzilla2
61.537Cleveland is a Dump?!BSS::J_VANMETERTue May 17 1994 15:3217
    re:536
    
    Thank You!!!
    
    Yes!! Cleveland is the Rock -n- Roll capital of the World!  Has been
    for a while now.  Declared, voted on and a Hall of fame built there.
    I don't see the humor in this "fact".  I tell you what is funny, is the
    fact you came from Detroit and thought Cleveland was a dump.  If GOD
    was going to give the world and enema, Detroit is where HE would stick
    the hose.    
    
    The Browns "are" number #1
    Indians and Reds in World Series
    Cavs back Alive in 95....
    
    Thank you for your Support!!!!
    
61.538CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeTue May 17 1994 15:441
You guys ought to clean up the imagery just a little bit....
61.539PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue May 17 1994 15:494
61.540OLD1S::SYSTEMTue May 17 1994 15:598
	Well I must still say the week I spent in Detroit/Deerfield Village MI.
was better then the weekend I was stuck in Cleveland. I would not consider
either my favorite or the worst spots that DEC has seen fit to send me to in
support of our products in my 20+ years of Field work. 


 Cadzilla2
61.541WELCOME BACK HAL!!!BSS::J_VANMETERTue May 17 1994 17:0315
    HAL:
    
    It is sure a relief to findly here from you.  I have been pretty beat
    up by the non-Browns noters out there.  They are either knocking the
    Browns or correcting my spelling.  I have a picture in my mind on what
    these gentlemen look like and it is not pretty.  I dont know how you
    have endured their abuse over the years.  But, I guess when someone is
    right as we are in our opinion and choice of sports teams make it a
    little more bearable.  I think you'll be happy to pass out the dishes
    of crow for these buttheads to eat.   I will supply the crying towels.
    
    Browns knock at Super Bowl Door in 94!
    
    GO DAWGS!!!!!!!!!!
    
61.542similar stylesCTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Tue May 17 1994 17:0511
    
    All we need is fer BigGame to re-appear in the Donks file and we'd
    have two peas in a pod. 
    
    Guns a blazin'
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
    
61.543CNTROL::CHILDSBrillant, Charming and NastyTue May 17 1994 17:106
 speakin' of Gamey, did anyone catch the commerical of Elway flingin' that
 football with the tail on it? Straightest passes he's ever thrown. I'll
 bet he's petitionin' the league right now to switch to it.....

 mike 
61.544CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeTue May 17 1994 17:1214
re .541:

	I never thought I'd see the day, but it's back and alive:

	RCASO II



arghhhh........
'Saw


PS  Cleveland might make it as far as the Welcome Mat of the Super Bowl

61.545GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsTue May 17 1994 17:4812
>    Browns or correcting my spelling.  I have a picture in my mind on what
>    these gentlemen look like and it is not pretty.  I dont know how you

	Pretty small picture eh?

	Now, you're the guy who said his right brain was faster than
	his left brain, right?  So, you have two.  I vote that you
	give one of yours to Hal so that you'll both have 1 whole
	brain.  It would be very magnanimous on your part and all
	of ::sports would appreciate it.

Claybone    
61.546TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue May 17 1994 18:014
There really are literate, intelligent Browns fans in the world.  I think I've
met all three of them.

=Bob=
61.547Browns in SB? Add some of that to my coffeeQUASER::JACKSONTAThe Men go Fishing!Tue May 17 1994 18:1513
    re-vanmeter
    
      1)  Just because the R&R Hall of Fame may be built there doesn't make
    it the R&R capital.  We have the Rodeo Hall Of Fame here in Colorado
    Spring,  but we certainly don't consider Colorado Springs the Rodeo
    Capital.
    
      2)  I hope I'm not pretty to you!!
    
      3)  Don't you have a name?
    
    
      Tim
61.548CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeTue May 17 1994 18:2510
>	Now, you're the guy who said his right brain was faster than
>	his left brain, right?  So, you have two.  I vote that you
>	give one of yours to Hal so that you'll both have 1 whole
>	brain.  It would be very magnanimous on your part and all
>	of ::sports would appreciate it.

Claybone, that's CLASSIC......


'Saw
61.549Cleveland is R&R Capital!BSS::J_VANMETERTue May 17 1994 19:1611
    re:547
    
    OK!  For the sake of argument.  You tell me then, where! is the R&R
    capital.  You are arguing that it is not Cleveland.  Prove me wrong! or
    shut up!!!!!
    
    Thank you for your support!!!!!!
    
    
    Jeff
    
61.550Elway has big lips! He didnt in High School!!BSS::J_VANMETERTue May 17 1994 19:208
    I appreciate the slap at Elway!  The Browns will send him straight to
    hell this year......!
    
    
    GO DAWGS!!!!!  WOOF!!!!   WOOF!!!!
    
    Jeff
    
61.551'Nuf saidPTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandTue May 17 1994 19:2345
    WHAT IS A BROWN?????????
    
    A BENGAL is a Tiger
    And a fast plane is a JET
    A COWBOY comes from Texas
    And a RAIDER is tough, I bet,
    
    A VIKING is from the frigid north
    SEAHAWKS live by the sea
    All are names of football teams
    Just like they ought to be,
    
    I don't know if it's true
    But I think I've heard a theory
    That Cleveland named it's football team
    After the color of Lake Erie,
    
    BROWN does not describe
    A big, strong athletic man
    It's what's inside the diaper
    of a baby STEELER fan,
    
    The guy who named this football team
    Must be a Cleveland Clown
    Who else would think to call
    A football warrior a BROWN
    
    If I'd been born in Cleveland
    And there my life was spent
    I'd find another team to cheer
    From pure embarassment,
    
    I, myself, have always loved
    The STEELERS "Black and Gold"
    i did when I was very young
    And will when I am old,
    
    Does the BROWN name come from BROWNIES
    The girl scouts we know of sorts
    Or is the name derived
    From the skidmarks in their shorts???
    
    Can anybody tell me
    WHAT THE HELL IS A BROWN???????????????/
    
61.552What Rock legends came from Clevescum?OLD1S::SYSTEMTue May 17 1994 19:396
Well since the roots of Rock started in the south, I can't see how Cleveland
can be the capitol. Memphis comes much closer, with Elvis, Jerry Lee and Chuck
Berry among others coming from that general area. 

  Cadzilla2
61.553PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandTue May 17 1994 19:416
    They're trying to find some non-toxic land up there to build it on. 
    But in no way is Clevescum the TRUE CAPITAL, hail, they just offered
    more donero to the developers of the R&R HoF.
    
    JaKe
    
61.554OH YEAH!!!BSS::J_VANMETERTue May 17 1994 19:4413
    re: 548
    
    Hey!  Pretty good! Clay"bonehead" youre improving.  Your folks would be
    proud.  With a little practice you may someday advance out of idiot
    status.  The first step of course would be to repent of your sins and
    become a BROWNS fan!.  You would then see the World in a better light
    and you would learn three(3) valuble life lessons; Patience, Humility
    and the ability too crap from empty headed idiots with out blinking
    an eye.......
    
    
    jeff
    
61.555PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandTue May 17 1994 19:464
    Oh, cripes sakes, 2 HAL's, our worst nightmare!!!!!!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.556PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandTue May 17 1994 19:4815
    
    >>status.  The first step of course would be to repent of your sins and
    >>become a BROWNS fan!.  You would then see the World in a better light
    >>and you would learn three(3) valuble life lessons; Patience, Humility
    >>and the ability too crap from empty headed idiots with out blinking
    >>an eye.......
    
    You forgot one valuable lesson you have to learn in Clevescum, dealing
    with toxic waste as an everyday occurence, seeing as Clevescum is the
    world's only inhabitated toxic waste/raw sewage dump.
    
    Go back in yer hole, sewer rat!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.557CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeTue May 17 1994 20:015
>Well since the roots of Rock started in the south, I can't see how Cleveland
>can be the capitol. Memphis comes much closer, with Elvis, Jerry Lee and Chuck
>Berry among others coming from that general area. 

Can't forget the likes of Carl Perkins either.....
61.558GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsTue May 17 1994 20:096
    
    	OK.  <Shazam!>  I'm a Browns fan.  Now I'm at idiot status!
    	Please give me mega doses of humility.  I need it because 
    	we've been humiliated so badly by the Broncos.
    
    Stupid
61.559CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeTue May 17 1994 20:1315
>    
>    	OK.  <Shazam!>  I'm a Browns fan.  Now I'm at idiot status!
>    	Please give me mega doses of humility.  I need it because 
>    	we've been humiliated so badly by the Broncos.
>    
>    Stupid

Snap out of it Claybone!

Man, idiocy is catching....  I mean, I hate the Broncos, but the Browns,
man, the Browns... whoa... how low can you go.....


'Saw

61.560HANNAH::ASHEHome of the driveby noter...Tue May 17 1994 20:305
    Detriot (tm) >> Cleveland:
    
    Detriot: No place for wimps
    Cleveland: No place for humans...
    
61.561CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeTue May 17 1994 20:329
>    Cleveland: No place for humans...


The Land of Cleves.  If it was the Land of Cleavage, I could get into
that.  Unfortunately no one around here ever heard of a cleve....


'Saw    

61.562ROCK::HUBERCleveland Crunch - 1994 NPSL ChampionsTue May 17 1994 20:3527
    
    Re: Browns
    
    FWIW, I think they had a decent draft.  However, Vinnie & Rypien aren't
    going to lead a team anywhere.  Best case, the defense (particularly
    the secondary) gels, and the Browns make the playoffs.  I still
    want to see Belichek fired, even if that happens.
    
    Re: R&R Hall of Fame
    
    The key claim for Cleveland, at least that I'm aware of, is that
    a DJ (Bill F-something), working in Cleveland at the time, coined
    the phrase Rock and Roll.  There have been some groups to come
    out of Cleveland, but not many of any note (Raspberries come to
    mind).
    
    BTW, I believe they have broken ground.
    
    Re: Cleveland Jokes
    
    Watching a bit of Mr. Baseball last night, I had the chance to see
    yet another derogatory reference to Cleveland.  Has a negative
    impression of the city become so ingrained into American culture
    that no amount of change (and IMHO it's clear that the city has
    improved in recent years) will change public opinion?
    
    Joe (probably about to regret opening his mouth during this string...)
61.563JAKE'A DAWG!BSS::J_VANMETERTue May 17 1994 21:1210
    RE: 551
    
    Wow! Jake, I am speechless, I dont know what to say.  Your poem was
    heart felt.  It is a work of art.  I am honored to have been able to
    read it.  Tell me!  You are really a BROWNS fan arent ya!  I mean after
    all you are named after a DAWG!.  I even heard a song about ya! FEED
    JAKE!  Good tune.  But all kidding aside,  Great! poem.
    
    jeff
    
61.564TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue May 17 1994 21:153
re: .562

You see - a literate Browns fan.  In ::SPROTS no less.
61.565PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandTue May 17 1994 21:2931
    
    
    >>Re: Browns
    
    >>FWIW, I think they had a decent draft.
    
    Now if yer talking Newcastle Brown (Ale), that's a good draft.  I'd be
    suspicious of any brew coming from Clevescum as it'd probably be
    Cuyahoga River water, and that stuff is flammable.
    
    >>The key claim for Cleveland, at least that I'm aware of, is that
    >>a DJ (Bill F-something), working in Cleveland at the time, coined
    >>the phrase Rock and Roll.  There have been some groups to come
    >>out of Cleveland, but not many of any note (Raspberries come to
    >>mind).
    
    The Michael Stanley Band was another short lived not too great band
    from Clevescum.
    
    >>BTW, I believe they have broken ground.
    
    More accurately, "broken sludge" fer Clevescum...and the wimmens(term
    used loosely) are continuing to break wind.
    
    >>Re: Cleveland Jokes
    
    Clevescum IS a joke.
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.566PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandTue May 17 1994 21:3214
    
    >>read it.  Tell me!  You are really a BROWNS fan arent ya!  I mean after
    >>all you are named after a DAWG!.  I even heard a song about ya! FEED
    >>JAKE!  Good tune.  But all kidding aside,  Great! poem.
    
    Nope not a Brown(spot)s(tm) fan at all, and the name similarity with
    the song is just a co-ink-eee-dink.
    
    Although, when I see a map of OHIO, I do squat and crap on Clevescum.
    
    Re the poem, unfortunately, I din't compose it, just passed it on.
    
    JaKe
    
61.567Broon Cack.PAKORA::DWALLACENymphing maniacWed May 18 1994 10:078
    I'll interperate an old Cleveland word into the Scots mother tongue:
    
    	Browns  =  Sad act
    
    What more can I say except have a little sympathy for us Miami fans
    having the highest paid failure QB as a back-up this season.
    
    Davie.
61.568PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 18 1994 13:225
61.569Cuss'nt stay silent anemoreTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodWed May 18 1994 13:3416
    Weel, Iv'e been paitiently waiting backin the backgrround here for
    sumone to say sumthing that sumone cain underdaind that makes sume
    sense about the CLEVLEAND BROWNS, but so far so one has said sumthing
    so I geuss I will.
    Bilichik has asseemlbed a team that nexted year can easily content for
    the AFC titel.  Belechik may not have a greet personality, but he
    cain't be expected to deal wif the press aprioctially and remain treu
    to his players.  Bilechek knows one is greeater than the other.  For
    Beleichik to cowtow to the press would be worng and Bellichek nows
    right frum worng.
    Brigning in Tistenventre to run the offense WEORKED!!!  It will
    agian!!!!  Browns defense is worked, too!!!  Offsne plus
    defnse==CHAPIONSHIONPS!!!!  SO AFC ISS OURS NEXTRED SEEASON!!!!
    
    YOU NOW WOH I AM
    
61.570ROCK::HUBERCleveland Crunch - 1994 NPSL ChampionsWed May 18 1994 13:4410
    
    Re .565
    
>    The Michael Stanley Band was another short lived not too great band
>    from Clevescum.
    
    Didn't think they had enough national noteriety to name, or I would
    have.
    
    Joe
61.571BROWNS to take it all!!!BSS::J_VANMETERWed May 18 1994 14:4415
    You heard it here first.  hearyee!  hearyee! hearyee!
    
    BROWNS -N- GIANTS in Super Bowl!!!
    
    BROWNS win it all in a blow out!!!
    
    Boys its a given bet the ranch!!!!
    
    No sense playing the season, may as well go straight to the Super
    Bowl....
    
    
    Jeff
    
    
61.572Road to Super Bowl!!!!BSS::J_VANMETERWed May 18 1994 15:2527
    Here it is guys the Browns road to the Super Bowl!!!!!!!
    
    Sep  4 - at Cincinnati
    Sep 11 -    Pittsburgh
    Sep 18 -    Arizona
    Sep 25 - at Indianapolis
    Oct  2 -    New York Jets
    Oct  9 -    -Bye Week-
    Oct 13 - at Houston
    Oct 23 -    Cincinnati
    Oct 30 - at Denver
    Nov  6 -    New England
    Nov 13 - at Philadelphia
    Nov 20 - at Kansas City
    Nov 27 -    Houston
    Dec  4 -    New York Giants (Super Bowl Preview)
    Dec 10 - at Dallas
    Dec 18 - at Pittsburgh
    Dec 24 -    Seattle
    
    There you have it a 14 - 2 seasons for Cleveland!
    and Home field advantage in the playoffs!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    jeff
    
61.573maybe backwardsHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderWed May 18 1994 15:345
>    Oct  9 -    -Bye Week-

One they probably won't lose.

TTom
61.574PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 18 1994 16:101
    Giants in the Super Bowl?  He must be on drugs.
61.575CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeWed May 18 1994 16:136
>
>    Giants in the Super Bowl?  He must be on drugs.
>

Even I'll agree with that one.  Although I must say the Giants have
emminently more chance than the Browns.....or the Pats ;^)
61.576PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 18 1994 16:174
61.577Was he part of the "handout program"? ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYWed May 18 1994 16:5110
    
    
>>    Giants in the Super Bowl?  He must be on drugs.
    
    
    		Yabbut speaking of drugs, anybody heard from Needle lately?
    
    He's been outa here for a longgggg longgggg time
    
    
61.578DO IT DAWGS!!!!!BSS::J_VANMETERWed May 18 1994 17:089
    I know that in a earlier note I had predicted a 9-7 season for the
    DAWGS.   That was before I had a chance to see the schedule.  The
    schedule clearly indicates a cake walk for the BROWNS this year.
    and of course beating the GIANTS in the SUPER BOWL!!!!!
    
    GO DAWGS!!!!   WOOF!!!!   WOOF!!!!    14 - 2!!!!!
    
    JEFF
    
61.579ELMAGO::BENBACAI *did* forget to change the P_N!Wed May 18 1994 19:391
    so who are the two teams who will crush Clevswamp?
61.580PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandWed May 18 1994 19:4614
    
    >>GO DAWGS!!!!   WOOF!!!!   WOOF!!!!    14 - 2!!!!!
    
    Ok HAL, come clean and admit you got an account on another machine
    under a different name.  Reading "Jeff's" notes it's painfully apparent
    that either:
    
    	1.)  There's more than one brain daid Clevescum fan that cain't
    read the writing on the wall.
    
    	2.)  Yer noting in here under your own AND an assumed name.
    
    JaKe
    
61.581PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandWed May 18 1994 19:4713
    
    >>That's pretty funny coming from an Iron City man.
    
    And this coming from a freakin' RUGBY player.
    
    BTW, what goes in and out and smells of urine???
    
    A 90 year old lady doing the hokey pokey!!!
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
61.58210 - 6 is what i saySUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed May 18 1994 20:0610
    
    	Sorry Jeff, I can't say the Browns will go 12-2 for the season.
    	I really think they have a hell of hard schedule at the end.  They
    	are going to have to win at the begining of the season and
        hopefully secure a playoff spot early.  
    
    	go DAWGS!!!		WOOF!	WOOF!
    
    
                                                      
61.583PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandWed May 18 1994 20:0911
    
    >>                       -< 10 - 6 is what i say >-

    
    >>	Sorry Jeff, I can't say the Browns will go 12-2 for the season.
    
    HAL, you cain't even say if the Brown(spot)s(tm) are going to play 14
    or 16 games!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.584PTOVAX::JACOBWhat part of NO dintya unnerstandWed May 18 1994 20:5916
    
    >>That's pretty funny coming from an Iron City man.
    
    Hey MAC,
    
    At least Ahnr City is drinkable and ya cain see thru it.
    
    Clevescum beer resembles peanut butter, and to further confuse ya, it
    comes in regular and chunky, too.
    
    All they do is take a shovel and get a scoop of Cuyahoga River water,
    add a teaspoon of sugar to it, a little yeast, and put it straight in
    the jar...er...can.
    
    JaKe
    
61.585Pigsturd SUCKS!!!!BSS::J_VANMETERThu May 19 1994 14:2417
    re: 584
    
    Hey Jake:
    
    If-n- yer from pigsturd, I dont see hows you can possibly degrade
    Cleveland as a dirty city.  I have been to pigsturd, and comparing the
    two citys Cleveland by far is the cleanest of two.  Cleveland biggest
    problem was lake Erie.  Which had polution problem coming out of
    Buffalo, Erie, Toronto, Toledo and Detroit.  and the flow of the lake
    backed all the polution into Cleveland.  Pigsturd has no one to blame
    but their selves for the situations there.  Yes they are cleaning
    pigsturd up.   But Cleveland is doing the same.  I suggest you get your
    collective crap together and get the facts straight before you make
    ridiculas statement of the nature.   and I "HATES" the Pigsturd
    Squeelers.   So there!!!!!
    
     
61.586a word from your moderatorPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu May 19 1994 14:312
    I think we've had just about enough of this.  Can we get back to
    talking football?
61.587CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeThu May 19 1994 14:368
>                        -< a word from your moderator >-
>
>    I think we've had just about enough of this.  Can we get back to
>    talking football?
>

Have Browns fans EVER talked football, Mac????

61.588Never mind...HANNAH::ASHEHome of the driveby noter...Thu May 19 1994 14:471
    Have they won a superbowl?
61.589Football Rules!!!BSS::J_VANMETERThu May 19 1994 15:024
    Thank you!  I would be glad too...
    
    jeff
    
61.590Browns rule the AFC!!!BSS::J_VANMETERThu May 19 1994 15:1010
    re: 588
    
    No...  My Browns have never won a Super Bowl.  We never lost one
    either.  The Browns will be the next AFC team to win a Super Bowl, the
    rest of the teams who have represented the AFC has been a pure
    embarrassment.  Only the Raiders have saved some respect for the AFC.
    The Browns will save the AFC this year!!!
    
    jeff
    
61.591Don't stop, don't stop, don't stop!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu May 19 1994 19:5717
    
    	Jeff.....
    
    		tm that baby!  "pigsturd"
    
    
    
    
    		I'm rollllling!!!!
    
    
    	I hope you don't mind me using it in future notes.
    
    
    	Go DAWGS!
    
    		WOOF!
61.592METSNY::francusTommy-Self-proclaimed God of WoofingThu May 19 1994 20:038
Pigsturd Squealers has a very nice ring to it.

Pigsturd Pens almost as nice.

Pigsturd Bucs not as much rhythm but will do just fine.

The Crazy Met

61.593PTOVAX::JACOBHoney, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!!Thu May 19 1994 20:0419
    re.585
    
    Get real Jeff.  With the lasted company I worked fer I had to travel to
    Clevescum on a regular basis.  I been there recently, too(complete with
    gas mask and space suit so the toxicity of the hole didn't make me
    sicker than I was to be there.
    
    Clevescum is the "victim" of other places waste!!  Bullsh_t!!!  The
    place is a toxic waste dump.  The stadium there is painted sludge.
    The faux-football team wear uniforms to match what they are, sh_t
    brown.
    
    Nuff said
    
    So let's talk football now, so I guess we won't talk about the
    Skidmarks of Clevescum.
    
    JaKe
    
61.594MSBCS::BRYDIETCM - World's Greatest SandbaggerThu May 19 1994 20:113
    
     The irony of Pittsburghers and Clevelanders arguing about which
    town is the bigger sewer is too much. 
61.595stop it man, you're killing meFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu May 19 1994 20:131
    
61.596PTOVAX::JACOBHoney, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!!Thu May 19 1994 20:144
    True, Boston is a bigger shithole than either of these two.
    
    JaKe
    
61.597FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu May 19 1994 20:152
    It's kinda like the irony of debating whether Nother Shame(tm) or
    Florida St. is the BIGGEST CHEAT!
61.598many examplesHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 19 1994 20:223
Or who's choking more in the playoffs: Atlanta or Phoenix.

TTom
61.599METSNY::francusTommy-Self-proclaimed God of WoofingThu May 19 1994 20:256
Atlanta. They let the Hawks take 'em to 5 in the first series.
Suns at least closed out GS when they had a chance.

The Crazy Met

61.600snarfFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu May 19 1994 20:272
    
    
61.601Atlanta *IS* the HawksFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu May 19 1994 20:271
    >Atlanta. They let the Hawks take 'em to 5 in the first series.
61.602HANNAH::ASHELet me see shake yo tailfeather...Thu May 19 1994 20:284
    Uh, you mean the Heat, not the Hawks, right?
    
    Seattle choked more than either...
    
61.603METSNY::francusTommy-Self-proclaimed God of WoofingThu May 19 1994 20:286
umm, right.

Atlanta because they let the Heat take 'em to 5 in the first series.

The Crazy Met

61.604PTOVAX::JACOBHoney, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!!Thu May 19 1994 20:3713
    re.600
    
    Mike, we all know that anybody who uses that terminology to describe
    themselves while wasting a perfectly good note is really,
    subconsciously saying about themselves:
    
    S everly   N eurotic  A $$hole  R etarded  F __kup
    -          -          -         -          -
    
    I suggest you seek counselling to alleviate your opinion of yerself.
    
    JaKe
    
61.605speaking of waste, how ya doing Jake?FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu May 19 1994 20:441
    
61.606CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeThu May 19 1994 21:327
>                   -< speaking of waste, how ya doing Jake? >-
                                   ^^^^^
Okay, I can understand this being in the Cleveland note, but all the
other stuff about atlanta and phoenix doesn't belong here....8^)

    

61.607Browns Rule AFC!!!BSS::J_VANMETERThu May 19 1994 21:4714
    re: 591
    
    Hal:
    
    I wont be around long enough to bother with the (tm) so I will give you
    full rights to "pigsturd".  You may use it in way you see fit.
    
    After all the Browns fans have every right slam the pigsturd squealers.
    Browns "WILL" go to Super Bowl and beat the Giants!!!!!!
    
    
    
    jeff
    
61.608CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeFri May 20 1994 12:4613
>    
>    After all the Browns fans have every right slam the pigsturd squealers.
>    Browns "WILL" go to Super Bowl and beat the Giants!!!!!!
>    
    
This clearly shows how little football knowledge you possess.

I'm a Giants fan, and there's no way they're going to the dance this
year.  No way at all.......


'Saw    

61.609Why not. Giants?BSS::J_VANMETERFri May 20 1994 15:4616
    re: 608
    
    OK Saw:
    
    Who, but the Giants will represent the NFC at the Dance?  The Giants had
    a good year last year.  Even made the playoffs.  The other reasons I
    happened to choose the Giants is well Dallas is done, Detroit too
    young,  Saints too dumb,  49ers too old, Green Bay maybe in a couple,
    Vikings not together yet.  Giants are a tight unit right now and the
    way I see it the only logical choice for the NFC this year to meet the
    Browns in the Super Bowl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    jeff
    
    
61.610nuff saidCNTROL::CHILDSI got them GhostTown BluesFri May 20 1994 16:347
>>                     <<< Note 61.609 by BSS::J_VANMETER >>>
 >>                            -< Why not. Giants? >-

   
two words : Dan Reeves...........

mike
61.611TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Fri May 20 1994 16:444
   
|two words : Dan Reeves...........

I dunno mike, it's been a few years since Reeves lost a supe - he's due...
61.612CNTROL::CHILDSI got them GhostTown BluesFri May 20 1994 17:015
if you caught the Giants/Niners' playoff game last year, you'd have noticed
that he's just doing it sooner........

mike
61.613CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeFri May 20 1994 17:3422
If you knew anything at all about the Giants you'd know you're full of it.

The defensive line is a sieve, Simms probably won't be back 100% from
shoulder surgery which means one of the young guys will get lots of 
OJT.

The receiving corps is untested, the secondary ain't so hot.

Probably foremost, the Offensive line, tentative last year at best, lost
a couple of important cogs to FA.


There's Mike's main point to be considered too:  Dan Reeves......


I don't know who will take it in the NFC, but it the AFC *was* going to
win the Bowl, this would be there year.

And the Browns don't stand a chance of getting by:  Miami, Buffalo, or LA.....


'Saw
61.614MKFSA::LONGM-O-O-N spells layoff. Laws yes!Fri May 20 1994 17:355
	IMHO the only bowl game the Giants would meet the Browns in is the
	Toilet Bowl!


	billl
61.615CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeFri May 20 1994 17:384
>	IMHO the only bowl game the Giants would meet the Browns in is the
>	Toilet Bowl!

I've made a few giant brown ones in my time.....
61.616You jolly jokers...TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Fri May 20 1994 18:256
|>	IMHO the only bowl game the Giants would meet the Browns in is the
|>	Toilet Bowl!

|I've made a few giant brown ones in my time.....

Oh, I laughed so hard when I read that, that I was flushed...
61.617CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeFri May 20 1994 18:295
>Oh, I laughed so hard when I read that, that I was flushed...

Don't poo-poo my humor.....


61.618FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixFri May 20 1994 19:3514
          ####   #  ###########            ##        ###########       
      ####    ####    ####     ###         ###         ####     ###    
     ###        ##    ####      ###       #####        ####      ###   
    ####         #    ####      ###       # ###        ####      ###   
    ####              ####     ###       #   ###       ####     ###    
    ####              #########          #   ###       #########       
    ####              ####   ###        #########      ####            
    ####              ####    ###       #    ####      ####            
     ###        ##    ####    ####     #      ####     ####            
      ###     ##      ####    ####     #      ####     ####            
         #####      ########   ##### #####   ####### ########          

    This file is FREEWARE.  Use and distribute it far and wide.  Design
    Copyright (c) 1993 by Northern Spy Software.
61.619Cleveland rules againt pigsturdBSS::J_VANMETERFri May 20 1994 19:4613
    re:618
    
    
    
    C=Cleveland  R=Reaches  A=Alltime   P=Pinacle
    
    Beats Giants in Super Bowl!!!!!!
    
    
    jeff
    
    
    
61.620CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeFri May 20 1994 19:537
>    
>    Beats Giants in Super Bowl!!!!!!
>    
    
You and Mark Duper man......    
    

61.621I'm just so titalated by the thoughtful and mature discussion in this note...TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Fri May 20 1994 20:040
61.622 S O SBSS::J_VANMETERMon May 23 1994 21:3213
    Just a reminder:  Browns and Giants in Super Bowl!!
    
    Browns 32  Giants  13
    
    Bet the Ranch!!!!!
    
    Hell, sell the wife and bet that!!!!!!
    
    you heard it here, first...............
    
    
    jeff
    
61.623Send help for JeffSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOMon May 23 1994 22:0013
>    Hell, sell the wife and bet that!!!!!!


	I'd have more chance at that then the Browns have in making
the big party.  And believe me, I have no chance.

	Just a few words to get you back to reality jeff.

	"The Drive", "The Fumble",

	'nuff said,

	flying "love them donkeys" zamboni
61.624B B BBSS::J_VANMETERMon May 23 1994 22:259
    RE: 623
    
    gotta go I'll pick on you tommorow.....
    
    GO DAWGS!!!!!
    
    
    jeff
    
61.625PTOVAX::JACOBHoney, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!!Mon May 23 1994 22:357
    
    >>you heard it here, first...............
    
    And we're STILL laughing our asses off at that inane prediction!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.626CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeTue May 24 1994 13:028
You must be hangin' out with Jennifer Capriati if you're making
predictions like Browns-Giants in the Bowl.

Come to think of it, why don't you send me some of what you're on.  I
sure could use it....


'Saw
61.627Browns rule AFC!!!!BSS::J_VANMETERTue May 24 1994 15:2417
    re: 623
    
    Sooooo!  Your a @#* %#@* Bronco fan.
    I'm sorry,  The prediction I have made was based on futuristic
    scientific calculations.   Bronco fans live in the past.  The Broncos
    are on a roller coaster to hell.  They have Bum jr. for a coach, John
    "Donkey lips" Elway.  You guys kill me.  You have the nerve to bring up
    "The Fumble"  and  "The Drive", but never mention the embarrassing
    performance in the three Super Bowl appearences.  When the Browns may
    have at least made it respectable.  The Broncos have brought "shame" to
    the AFC.  At least the Browns have Dignity!  In the future my friend,
    take my advice abanden ship and pick another team, cant be Cleveland,
    ex Elway Nugget eaters are not allowed.    Have a nice day!!!!!!
    
    
    jeff
    
61.628Bronco dont have a line,Elway snorted it!!!BSS::J_VANMETERTue May 24 1994 15:398
    re: 625
    
    HEY JAKE:
    
    BPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    jeff
    
61.629METSNY::francusRangers,Knicks,Mets in '94Tue May 24 1994 15:408
> The prediction I have made was based on futuristic scientific calculations.
                             is                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

joke of the day.

The Crazy Met

61.630MSBCS::BRYDIETCM - World's Greatest SandbaggerTue May 24 1994 15:424
    
    
      These Pittsburgh-Cleveland debates really bring to mind the
     Algonquin Roundtable, don't they?
61.631Browns Take allBSS::J_VANMETERTue May 24 1994 15:429
    re: 626
    
    Man I'am high on life, and the Browns, life is good because my Browns
    will win the Super Bowl!!!!!!
    
    Thank you for your support!!!!!!!!!!
    
    jeff
    
61.632METSNY::francusRangers,Knicks,Mets in '94Tue May 24 1994 15:445
we'll see you in note 50 long before the next Super Bowl is played.

The Crazy Met

61.633CNTROL::CHILDSI got them GhostTown BluesTue May 24 1994 16:268

>> we'll see you in note 50 long before the next Super Bowl is played.

 but hopefully we'll see you there first!!!!!!!

 ;^)

61.634METSNY::francusRangers,Knicks,Mets in '94Tue May 24 1994 16:346
re: .633

Nah, Knicks will win it all.

The Crazy Met

61.635ActuallySPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOTue May 24 1994 16:5920
re: .627

	I'd much rather lose the girl at the dance then not to go 
at all.  When the Broncos lost, it was a matter of being crushed 
by a superior team.  When the Browns lost to the Broncos, it was 
a matter of not being able to pull the trigger when the gun was
locked,loaded and sighted on the target.  Choke city.

	A buddy of mine is a HUGE Dawgs fan.  To the point of 
having Browns floor mats for his car.  I love wearing dirty 
shoes in his car!  Over the years he's forced me to watch the 
Browns, and I've actually enjoyed it.  They're a team I respect,
but they don't know how to win yet when the going gets tough.

	I expect the Browns to have another winning season this
year, and will make the playoffs.  I don't expect them to advance
past the second round.  Depends a lot upon their O-line and 
their rotating quarterback.

	zamboni
61.636a_openingHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderTue May 24 1994 17:016
>	A buddy of mine is a HUGE Dawgs fan.  To the point of 
>having Browns floor mats for his car.  ...

There's a slur/joke in here somewhere for JaKe...

TTom
61.637CNTROL::CHILDSI got them GhostTown BluesTue May 24 1994 17:115
did you forget about the Rangers?????? and even if those two advance the
Mets' season will end long before the Dawgs start playing........

mike
61.638HANNAH::ASHELet me see shake yo tailfeather...Tue May 24 1994 17:152
    What does he know, he walks around with a shirt that says "Woof" on
    it... then again, you do too....
61.639METSNY::francusRangers,Knicks,Mets in '94Tue May 24 1994 17:538
well, far as I can tell there would be no need for me to 
go into note 50 for either the Rangers or Mets. Remember I'm the one who
kept saying watch out for the ghosts of 1940.

The Crazy Met



61.640MSBCS::BRYDIETCM - World's Greatest SandbaggerTue May 24 1994 17:556
    
     re .639
    
     You're right. Last year, in Mike Heiser's honor, you started
    the "Whiney Sore Loser" topic. This year, in your honor, I think
    I'll start the "Whiney Sandbagging Wussyman" topic.
61.641PTOVAX::JACOBHoney, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!!Tue May 24 1994 19:4311
    
    >>HEY JAKE:
    
    >>BPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    >>jeff
    
    Spoken as only a fan of the turds from Clevescum could.
    
    JaKe
    
61.642GET ME TO CAMP ON TIME!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue May 24 1994 19:5529
    
    	Clyde Goode, who will be handling Antonio Langham's contract
    negotiations, said the Browns' No.1 draft choice told him just one
    thing.
    
    	"He said, 'Get me signed and in camp on time,'" chuckled Goode, who
    is not only Langham's agent, but also his uncle.
    
    	Clyde and his wife, Vernell, raised Antonio from the time he was
    about three years old.  They also raised three sons of their own who
    went on to play in the NFL - Chris, Kerry and Pierre.
    	
    	While Clyde didn't represent any of them, he did learn the ropes
    about NFL contracts.  And in this day and age wherein the league
    stipulates how much you can pay the draft picks, there really isn't
    much likelihood of a player holding out.
    
    	"I really don't expect any problems." Goode said.
    	
    	And when will the negotiating begin?
    
    	"Just as soon as they'd like," said Goode, who is a former high
    school principal.
    
    	He and his wife have also handled investments for family and
    friends over the years.
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.643At least one sensible Dawg fan.OURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen Sales Support 592-5249Tue May 24 1994 21:424
Never thought I'd enjoy one of Hal's notes but thanks for the information 
on the Dogs Hal. 

Jeff
61.644NO 1 BROWNS FANBSS::J_VANMETERTue May 24 1994 22:178
    Yes.  Thanks Hal for the info.  Of course the "buttheads" havn't
    replied with their usual empty headed remarks.  It was nice too read
    something with realism for a change.  Thanks again Hal.
    
    Go DAWGS!!!!
    
    jeff
    
61.645Elway envyismQUASER::JACKSONTABoat+Camper+Beer=Blue MesaTue May 24 1994 23:059
      Go fishin' for 4 days and come back to this?
    
      How many people that were raised in Cleveland would go back and live
    there?
    
      Of the 4 people I have met from there,  all said no way!!
    
    
      Tim 
61.646I'd rather be JamacianCNTROL::CHILDSI got them GhostTown BluesTue May 24 1994 23:266
 yeah and Seger said "Get out of Denver babeeeeeeeee"........

 all relative another words....

 mike
61.647Alexander Brings More VersatilitySUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed May 25 1994 11:1437
    
    	One reason the Browns drafted Derric Alexander was his ability to
    improve the special teams.
    	
    	"I think he'll help us in the return game," Bill Belichick said. 
    "He's just a real quality player.  We have to give him some
    opportunities in the preseason."
    
    	Eric Metcalf, a Pro Bowl selection, has been the club's top punt
    returner and will not necessarily give up his job right away.
    
    	"We still want to get the ball into Eric's hands as many times as
    we can," Belichick said.  "We might have an opportunity to use them
    both at times."
    
    	Alexander tied the University of Michigan record with four punt
    returns for touchdowns.
    
    	"I like returning punts better," he said, "but I can return
    kickoffs, too.  It's just that I haven't scored any touchdowns on
    kickoff returns and I've scored four on punt returns."
    
    	Alexander averaged 17.7 yards per catch as a senior with 19 yards
    on his nine kickoff returns.
    
    	With kickoffs being moved back to the 30 yard line next year, more
    emphasis will be placed on returns.
    
    	"The return game is becomming even more significant," Owner Art
    Modelll said.  "Kicking from the 30 yard line off a one-inch tee will
    create a lot more returns than ever before."
    
    	It's expected that Alexander will compete with Randy Baldwin for
    kickoff returner.
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.648CSC32::M_MACGREGORWed May 25 1994 16:0416
    ...>go into note 50 for either the Rangers
    
    Maybe my memory is a little hazy, but I could have sworn you said the
    Rangers would lose out to the Pens, but if they beat the pens then you
    would gladly go into note 50.  Obviously these two teams did not play,
    but the point is that you said the Pens were the ONLY team that could
    beat them with that remark.  Sounds to me like you might have a need.
    
    Back on the topic, looking at the Browns schedule I would not be too
    surprised to see them finish 8-8 or 7-9.  The first half is against
    teams trying to shake off bad seasons (read: tough games) and the
    second half are against good teams.  This will be a tough year for the
    Browns and their fans.
    
    Marc
    
61.649CAMONE::WAYBleaumeWed May 25 1994 16:1223
>    Back on the topic, looking at the Browns schedule I would not be too
>    surprised to see them finish 8-8 or 7-9.  The first half is against
>    teams trying to shake off bad seasons (read: tough games) and the
>    second half are against good teams.  This will be a tough year for the
>    Browns and their fans.

Every year is a tough year for the Browns and their fans.

Belichick doesn't have it down yet -- according to the Hal Theory, he 
has to buy lots more equipment and hire on about 6 new assistant
coaches so that they can stay afloat in the NFC Central.

The talent is weak at best and the two guys at the helm couldn't
Quarterback their way out of a wet paper bag.  If I wanted a proven
winner, I certainly wouldn't be going with anyone like Vinny Testaverde
or Mark "One Time Wonder" Rypien....


I'd be surprised to see them go 9-7......


'Saw    

61.650PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 25 1994 16:298
61.651METSNY::francusRangers,Knicks,Mets in '94Wed May 25 1994 16:336
So here I got Tommy accusing me of sandbaggin' and a Clevescum
fan saying the opposite. Come on folks get your act together!

The Crazy Met

61.652PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 25 1994 16:365
61.653CAMONE::WAYBleaumeWed May 25 1994 17:568
re NFC Central vis-a-vis the Browns....

Just a typo -- hell even spellchecker wouldn't grab that one.

Maybe I'd better write an NFL-Checker....


'Saw
61.654Official "DAWG" watcher!BSS::J_VANMETERWed May 25 1994 18:3815
    F.Y.I.
    
    For you Browns fans in the Colorado Springs area, or for the fans
    visiting the area this winter.  The Pikes Peak "BROWNS" Backers will
    be seeing every game at "The Alumni" lounge this year.  So far we have
    85 screeming BROWNS fans to see the game every Sunday via satilite
    feed.  The "Alumni" lounge is located at the corner of S. Academy Blvd
    and E. Pikes Peak Ave.  Free food buffet for members and discount beer
    prices go along with the fun of watching the "DAWGS" fight their way to
    the Super Bowl.  Come on in and "Join the Fun"!!!!!!!!
    
    
    Jeff
    
     
61.655CAMONE::WAYBleaumeWed May 25 1994 18:439
Well, we know one thing.  Cleveland schools can't teach spelling worth
two sh*ts....


Translation for folks from Cleveland:
(Tranlayshun for fulks from Cleevlund)

	Well, we no won thing Cleevlund skuuls kent teech spillleng
	wurth too shits.
61.656did RCASO have a son?FRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Wed May 25 1994 19:311
    
61.657PTOVAX::JACOBHoney, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!!Wed May 25 1994 19:3511
    
    
    >>For you Browns fans in the Colorado Springs area, or for the fans
    >>visiting the area this winter.  The Pikes Peak "BROWNS" Backers will
    >>be seeing every game at "The Alumni" lounge this year. 
    
    And as at all "Browns"backers meetings, there'll be lots  of fudge,
    tightly packed.
    
    JaKe
    
61.658FEED JAKEBSS::J_VANMETERWed May 25 1994 20:3712
    Jake: This ones for you pal.
    
    What is the difference between a proctologist and a Browns fan in
    Denver?
    
    A proctologist has to put up with one asswhole at a time.
    
    jeff
    
    
    Go Dawgs!!
    
61.659PTOVAX::JACOBHoney, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!!Wed May 25 1994 21:315
    Well lemme see, a Brown(spot)s(tm) fan in Denver is only one asshole in
    a very big place.
    
    JaKe
    
61.660JaKe didn't dog Denver? Off night?QUASER::JACKSONTABig Brown+lots of KokaneeThu May 26 1994 01:015
      What, no more Brownies games at the Underground jeff?  Did Tony kick
    youz guys out?
    
      Ti
    
61.661Browns at the AlumniBSS::J_VANMETERThu May 26 1994 15:0616
    > What, no more Brownies games at the Underground jeff?  Did Tony kick
    > youz guys out?
    
    We have been at The Club House for five years now and have grown to
    point that parking is a nightmare.  We decided to seek another
    establishment for parking reasons.  The Alumni fit our needs perfectly.
    Plus the Alumni is offering a better deal, Tony was just too cheap.
    He was charging us $3.50 for Coffee.  Tony would not budge with his
    prices.  We had requested he put on another person to wait tables, one
    was not enough with 60 to 85 screaming BROWNS fans to wait on.  Anyway
    we are happy to be at the Alumni...  Come on down and give a visit..
    Join the fun. Root the BROWNS to the Super Bowl.......!
    
    
    jeff
    
61.662NOT ON MY WORST HANGOVER!!QUASER::JACKSONTABig Brown+lots of KokaneeThu May 26 1994 16:5513
      My Dad is a regular at the Alumni.  I will be sure to tell him to
    aviod it on Sunday's,  but I'm sure he knows that by now.
    
    
      I have never had parking problems at the Clubhouse.  I park in the
    back.
    
      We have thrown real mans darts (steel tips) out of there for 3 years. 
    We are leaving there do to crappy board arrangement, and Tony refused
    to better it.  Additionally, alot of the bands in there anymore are too
    alternative or just suck!!
    
      Tim
61.663FRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Thu May 26 1994 17:023
    What's the name of the circular-shaped sports bar off Academy near the 
    mall (Chapel Hill?)?  I remember it was up on a hill overlooking
    Academy.
61.664BROWNS RULE AFC!!BSS::J_VANMETERThu May 26 1994 17:099
>     What's the name of the circular-shaped sports bar off Academy near the
>     mall (Chapel Hill?)?  I remember it was up on a hill overlooking
>     Academy.
    
    I believe that would be the "DUBLIN HOUSE".  Fun place, The Packer
    backers hang out there.
    
    jeff
    
61.665Nice place to draft for the FFLOURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen Sales Support 592-5249Thu May 26 1994 17:124
Mike; 

That would be the Dublin House, Bronco territory Jeff Vanmeter wouldn't dare go
 nearwith his Brown spots jersey on. 
61.666Beast SnarfFRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Thu May 26 1994 17:263
    Yeah that's it.  Fun place.  Had some cute ladies working there last
    time I was there.  I made a killing off those poor Coloradians in the pool
    hall. ;-)
61.667BROWNS RULE DENVER FROM HERE TO ETERNITY!!BSS::J_VANMETERThu May 26 1994 17:3914
>    That would be the Dublin House, Bronco territory Jeff Vanmeter wouldn't
>    dare go nearwith his Brown spots jersey on.
    
    I have live in Colorado about 14 years now, I have worn my BROWNS
    attire anywhere and everywhere, even at Piled High Stadium when the
    Browns beat the Broncos on Monday night 3 years ago.  That was the last
    time the BROWNS played at piled high stadium.  This year the DENVER
    BROWNS BACKERS and the PIKES PEAK BROWNS BACKERS will be attending the
    game at piled high on Oct 30, with a full fledge TAIL GATE party
    preceeding the game.  And you can bet I will be dressed out "BROWNS
    DOWN".  BROWNS 27 - broncos 3.  I dont fear wimps!!!!!
    
    jeff
    
61.668CAMONE::WAYBleaumeThu May 26 1994 17:4410
>    game at piled high on Oct 30, with a full fledge TAIL GATE party

Wow.


>    preceeding the game.  And you can bet I will be dressed out "BROWNS
>    DOWN".  BROWNS 27 - broncos 3.  I dont fear wimps!!!!!
    
Last time I saw something "browns down" it came out of my ass end.....    

61.669BRWONS, SUPER BOWL BOUND!!!BSS::J_VANMETERThu May 26 1994 17:546
    re: 668
    
    That was your head!!
    
    Go DAWGS!!!!
    
61.670CAMONE::WAYBleaumeThu May 26 1994 18:0223
>    
>    That was your head!!
>    

Hardly.  If I could get my head that far back there, it'd mean I could
get it someplace else and if I could do that, I'd never leave the house,
let alone give a damn about football, the Browns, or anything else on TV....



The Browns will suck this year just like they've always sucked.
Bellichick lets his pride get in the way of sound decisions.
They have no quarterback -- they have one who's never come close, and
one who was a one shot wonder.

Their defense is suspect, and Billy B knows nothing about offense.

Look for Modell to freak and fire him mid-season.


The Browns will finish a dismal 3rd in their division behind Houston
and Pittsburgh, with Cincy makin' it really interesting all the way....    

61.671Your a riot or will start oneQUASER::JACKSONTABig Brown+lots of KokaneeThu May 26 1994 19:386
    jeff doesnt fear wimps?  Why would anyone fear the brownies?
    
    jeff,  make sure all you stain backers sit in the south stands, and
    right in the middle.  They love people like you (-)
    
    Tim
61.672RUNNING BACK COACHSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu May 26 1994 19:485
    
    	Bill B. doesn't run the offense anymore.....the Browns hired an
    	offensive coordinator for this season.  YES!
    
    	WOOF!
61.673ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetThu May 26 1994 20:4619
    
    Re .670
    
    While I disagree with the thrust of your note (the Browns should
    be mediocre this season, though I wouldn't mind seeing your
    prediction come true just to be rid of Belichek), I have to strongly
    disagree with one point:
    
> The Browns will suck this year just like they've always sucked.
    
    They have not "always sucked".  From 1946-1964, the Browns were the
    best team in football.  Since then, they've been undistinguished -
    the good teams (Kardiac Kids, late 80's) haven't been quite good
    enough, and the bad teams (mid 70's, early 90's) have generally
    been a step above the dregs of the league at the time.  But the
    current mediocrity shouldn't tarnish the accomplishments of earlier
    teams...
    
    Joe 
61.674PTOVAX::JACOBHoney, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!!Thu May 26 1994 20:5510
    
    
    >>They have not "always sucked".  From 1946-1964, the Browns were the
    >>best team in football.
    
    Yeah, and dinosaurs ruled the earth, once.  But both are ancient
    history.
    
    JaKe
    
61.675I LIKE HISTORY!!!BSS::J_VANMETERThu May 26 1994 21:0911
>>   Yeah, and dinosaurs ruled the earth, once.  But both are ancient
>>   history.
    
    That would put "THE FUMBLE" and "THE DRIVE" in the same history book 
    now wouldn't it??
    
    Thank You! for your support!!!!
    
    
    jeff
    
61.677PTOVAX::JACOBHoney, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!!Thu May 26 1994 21:1912
    >>That would put "THE FUMBLE" and "THE DRIVE" in the same history book 
    >>now wouldn't it??
    
    Nah, it's recent enuf history that it is still in the recesses of what
    little brains that Brownscum fans(a$$holes) have.
    
    Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
    
    JaKe
    

    
61.678Better make that '46-57AKOCOA::BREENTurn down the lights, the parties overFri May 27 1994 16:022
    Browns won nfl-east in '57 and giants (eagles in '60) beat them thru
    early '60s.
61.679Get the fax straight!!BSS::J_VANMETERFri May 27 1994 17:039
>>    Browns won nfl-east in '57 and giants (eagles in '60) beat them thru
>>    early '60s.
    
    The Browns won the NFL championship in 1964 27-0 against the Baltimore
    Colts.  Lost the Championship game against Green Bay in the Mud bowl in
    1965(The last game Jim Brown Played).
    
    jeff
                                        
61.680A Way to say it!!!!BSS::J_VANMETERFri May 27 1994 22:3236
                           
    
                         " A BROWNS FANS HEART "
    
                                  BY
    
                            Jeff Van Meter
         
                               ********
    
                    You might say I bragg a bit,
                       One might say I'm full of Shit.
    
                    You might think I'm off my rocker,
                       Some just wish I'd see a doctor.
    
                    I carry a torch, a life-long goal,
                       To see My Browns in the Super Bowl.
    
                    I've been close, my glory near,
                       Only to take it in the rear.
    
                    Dreams live on, sometimes crumble,
                       case in point, was the "THE FUMBLE"
    
                    Pride fights on and will survive,
                       But then you stab me with "THE DRIVE"
    
                    One day I'll make it, My goal at last,
                       To tell you phucks to kiss my A__..
    
    
    
    
    jeff
    
61.681(8^)*PTOVAX::JACOBSat May 28 1994 00:4327
>>                    You might say I bragg a bit,
>>                       One might say I'm full of Shit.
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    We don't say it, we KNOW it.
    
>>                    I carry a torch, a life-long goal,
>>                       To see My Browns in the Super Bowl.
  
    There ain't enuf gas in the world, and you ain't gonna live long enuf
    to see them in anything but the TOILET bowl.
      
>>                    I've been close, my glory near,
>>                       Only to take it in the rear.
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Ya, but you Brownscum fans like taken it that way, anyways.

>>                    One day I'll make it, My goal at last,
>>                       To tell you phucks to kiss my A__..
    
    Mark a spot, yer ALL a$$.
    
    Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
    
    JaKe
    
61.682raising the literary level of ::SPROTS to a new heightsTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue May 31 1994 12:571
Oh, now my life is complete...
61.683CAMONE::WAYBleaumeTue May 31 1994 13:0720
>    They have not "always sucked".  From 1946-1964, the Browns were the
>    best team in football.  Since then, they've been undistinguished -
>    the good teams (Kardiac Kids, late 80's) haven't been quite good
>    enough, and the bad teams (mid 70's, early 90's) have generally
>    been a step above the dregs of the league at the time.  But the
>    current mediocrity shouldn't tarnish the accomplishments of earlier
>    teams...
    
Ancient history, Joe.

Football is a what have you done for me lately game.  The Packers
were probably the best football team of the 60s and the Steelers
in the 70s, but these days, that don't count for squat.

The Browns will suck this year, just like they have for the past
bunch o' years....


'SAw

61.684CAMONE::WAYBleaumeTue May 31 1994 13:0813
>    
>                         " A BROWNS FANS HEART "
>    
>                                  BY
>    
>                            Jeff Van Meter
>         
                               ********


Don't give up the day job, Jeff....


61.685NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue May 31 1994 13:128
>    Football is a what have you done for me lately game. 
    
    Unless you are and always will be a Baltimore Colts fan.  If that's the
    case, the world ended in 1984 (or maybe even in 1971...)
    
    glenn
    
61.686only a Browns fanFRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Tue May 31 1994 16:482
    that's priceless.  He blanks out the S's in ass but spells out the
    profanity.
61.687What does PA stand for? Pigs Ass?BSS::J_VANMETERTue May 31 1994 21:2132
 re. 681
    
    Hey Jake;
    
    I marked the spot, and I wait.
    
    ......................................
    
    Dawgs 52, Pisgturd 0.
    
    member that one Jake.
    
    I just have two things too say to you Jake.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Eric Metcalf.
    
    
    
    Have a gooooooooooood day..
    
    jeff
    
61.688PTOVAX::JACOBTue May 31 1994 23:0714
    
    >>I just have two things too say to you Jake.
    
    
    >>Eric Metcalf.
    
    I have 4 things fer you, oh brainless one,
    
    
    Last season.....new season.
    
    
    JaKe
    
61.689CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricWed Jun 01 1994 12:455
Boy, reading these replies I'm going to buy you all "Hooked on Phonics"
for Christmas.

That and this PC software that I found "Fun with Spelling" and 
"Fun with Grammar".....
61.690PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 01 1994 14:401
    'Saw, have you seen any software that does an intelligence check?
61.691CSC32::GAULKEWed Jun 01 1994 15:447
    
    
    > Saw, have you seen any software that does an intelligence check?
    
     Sure, anything that prompts for a username or user id.
    
    
61.692BSS::J_VANMETERWed Jun 01 1994 16:052
    
    
61.693Forget what we enjoy!!!BSS::J_VANMETERWed Jun 01 1994 16:0917
    
    
    re; 688
    
    >> Last season.....new season
    
    Make a deal with ya jake.
    
    I'll forget the past, if you do!
    
    .................................
    
    Dont forget to check my spelling Saw.
    
    
    jeff
    
61.694apostrophe police - sitting in for the CadetsMETSNY::francusRangers,Knicks,Mets in '94Wed Jun 01 1994 16:246
> Dont forget to check my spelling Saw
   Don't

The Crazy Met

61.695FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 01 1994 17:003
    Re: Fun with Grammar
    
    That sounds sick!  We should respect our elders!
61.696PTOVAX::JACOBWed Jun 01 1994 19:4411
    
    >>Make a deal with ya jake.
    
    >>I'll forget the past, if you do!
    
    Okay.
    
    The Brown(spot)s(tm) STILL SUCK!!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.697CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricWed Jun 01 1994 20:2013
>
>    'Saw, have you seen any software that does an intelligence check?
>

Actually, at various times and various places I've seen some cool
intelligent systems, but in the context you're looking for, no.


re Jeff's spelling:

	If you'd figure out how it all works, I wouldn't have to
	check it....

61.698DAWG DAY AFTERNOON!BSS::J_VANMETERThu Jun 02 1994 16:5915
    Well guys; I got the word last night.  I'm outta here! tommorrow.
    
    Let me say I have enjoyed all of the word wars I have participated in
    with you buttheads.  Try not to pick on HAL to severely, after all this
    is the DAWGS note file and HAL is a DAWG fan.  Please remember my
    prediction, Browns beat Giants in SUPER BOWL!  I wish everyone good
    luck in your DIGITAL careers and life.  Keep your chin up.  My nickles
    worth of free advise is get your resumes together, because this is a
    company headed for death, act now before it is too late.  
    
    Seeya guys, and GO DAWGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    JEFF
    
61.699METSNY::francusRangers,Knicks,Mets in '94Thu Jun 02 1994 17:134
Best of luck Jeff.

The Crazy Met

61.700BARFFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaThu Jun 02 1994 17:281
    
61.701MKFSA::LONGDancin' INSIDE the fireThu Jun 02 1994 17:307
re .700:
>> Title:  SNARF
 
	Considering the topic, shouldn't that be BARF?


	billl
61.702CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricThu Jun 02 1994 17:4112
Jeez, Jeff, that's not fair.  

Whose spelling can I correct now?  Who can I accuse of being on drugs
for thinking that the Giants would make it to the Super Bowl????


Well, best o' luck to you, matey!  Keep the breeze at your back and
sun on your face, and don't ever sign on under a skipper named Ahab
(or Robbie Bob!)......

take care,
'Saw
61.703The 'Cadets are gonna miss youTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu Jun 02 1994 18:445
Jeff

Good luck in that your new job as an English professor.

=Bob=
61.704PTOVAX::JACOBThu Jun 02 1994 19:478
    Jeff, why leave so soon.  You were just what this note needed, more
    blind optimism concerning the hapless Brown(spot)s(tm) and their plight
    towards the bottom of the AFC Central again this year.
    
    Good Luck
    
    JaKe
    
61.705From a Steeler fanPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFThu Jun 02 1994 20:354
  Good Luck Jeff. While you and Hal haven't exactly been the most objective
  or realistic Brown(spot)s(tm) noters, you have been very entertaining.

	Keith 
61.706Browns camp '94SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Jul 20 1994 11:4634
    
    	Well, the training camps have opened...and...at the Browns camp...
    
    		Clay Mathews and Mike Johnson are not in Cleveland
    		uniforms.
    
    	Hopes are high in Browns teritory this season and as I've read in
    	several mags, the Browns are picked to finish 3rd in the Central.
    	Contrary to the mags picks, the Browns hope to make the playoffs,
    	well, not really hope but EXPECT the Browns to make the playoffs.
    	
    	Tupa is expected to handle the punting duties.
    	Vinnie will take the helm.
    	Bernie is forgotten....almost.
    	Mark Rypkin can win as backup....if he has anything left.
    	Byner will be good veteran leadership....if he doesn't get the
    		ball.
    	The offensive line is the best in years.
    	Vardell and Metcalf are both to have banner year.
    	Stover is a rock.
    	The DL is the best it can get.
    	Secondary will be lead by mad man Turner who will be an all pro.
    	
    	Biggest question is ... Linebacker ...
    
    	From what I have heard, the Browns will have a throwback game
    	durring one of their pre-season matchups this year where they will
    	wear the unifor of the 1964 team and Leroy Kelly will receive his
    	Hall of Fame ring durring the halftime.
    
    
    		WOOF!  WOOF!
    
    
61.707CAMONE::WAYCome to Butt-headWed Jul 20 1994 12:561
Same as '93, but Hal just changed the dates....8^)
61.708 :*) GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsWed Jul 20 1994 13:455
    
    	If I EVER catch the guy who taught Hal what a "form feed"
    	is.......
    
    Claybone
61.709WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Wed Jul 20 1994 14:2110
    
    
         Hal, 
    
           You don't really believe this team is going to make the playoffs
    do ya? You sound like a Red Sox fan in April?
    
    
    
    Chap
61.710Not as bad as years pastQUASER::JACKSONTAWelcome to the MachineSun Jul 24 1994 13:337
      Hal,
    
      Get your excuse list ready for after the Oct. 30th game at Mile Hi!!
    
      Where's your sidekick Iceman?
    
      Tim
61.711Ny goes down.....againSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Aug 09 1994 11:449
    
    	The Dawgs continue to domminate the NY Giants!!!
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
    		Playoffs....here we come!  What a team these Browns are!
    
    		
61.712CAMONE::WAYTry 664/668, Neighborhood of The BeastTue Aug 09 1994 12:5120
>
>    
>    	The Dawgs continue to domminate the NY Giants!!!
>    
>    


I finally figured it out.  Hal is like that comedian Norm Crosby who always
mis-uses words.  

Hal, look up domination, put the definition in here (Websters will do nicely)
and then back up your use of the word with some statistics.

Even with the win the other evening, I'm sure your "domination" statistics
will fail as miserably as they did last year when you made the same wildly
unsubstantiated statement....


'Saw    		

61.713A winner.......28-20SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Sep 06 1994 11:1924
    
    	Well, the Browns managed to win their opener.  They didn't do it 
    	with their offense but did it with their special teams play.
    
    	A kickoff return and a punt return for TD's.  1st time in NFL
    	history.  Another 1st for the Browns.....1st team in NFL history
    	to score the two pointer after a TD.  Tom Tupa ran the ball in
    	for the score.  The hole was so big that a truck could have gone
    	through it.
    
    	Vinnie didn't have that great of a game but there were several
    	passes dropped.  Leroy Hoard was the offensive star of the game.
    	He ran well but did fumble the ball twice, not losing either.
    
    	Antonio Langman, Browns #1 draft pick this year...started the game
    	and intercepted the pass in the endzone to lock the game.
    
    	In my opinion, the Browns have a long way to go if they plan on
    	making the playoffs.  Not sure of how next week will go.
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
    
61.714triviaCSC32::J_HENSONand it's still too short!Tue Sep 06 1994 13:214
Congratulations to the Brownies.  They are now the answer to the trivia
question "Who was the first NFL team to score a 2 point conversion?".

Jerry
61.715ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Wed Sep 07 1994 03:396
61.716PTOVAX::JACOBWed Sep 07 1994 04:039
    hey Groaner, nice to see ya in here early, but when the rabid mutts are
    eliminated from playoff contention in week 12, I doubt you'll show yer
    face in here.
    
    gloat now, but there's still 15 games to go, and the mongrels from
    Clevescum ain't gonna win 9 games this year.
    
    JaKe
    
61.717ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Wed Sep 07 1994 12:597
    
> Congratulations to the Brownies.  They are now the answer to the trivia
> question "Who was the first NFL team to score a 2 point conversion?".
    
    Didn't the NFL have the 2 point conversion early on in its history?
    
    Joe
61.718Good Luck Browns (Metcalf/Hoard could have big years)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Sep 07 1994 17:0522
    Congrats to the Browns, sitting alone on top of the division with a
    big game at home vs Pittsburg this week, good luck.
    
    Pittsburg didnt look too impressive, Cleveland may have got a little
    lucky with 2 returns for TD's but metcalf gives them that extra kick.
    
    I bet Pittsburg Special team coach is having a field day with game
    films.. KICK AWAY FROM METCALF :-)
    
    Good Luck, no one else in the cental looks all that great maybe this
    will be the Dawgs year to win the division (Is Cody out this week in
    Houston @ Dallas).
    
    A Cleveland win could put them up 2 games (2 divisional games) after
    the first 2 weeks.. Who could ask for anything more :-)
    
    Good Luck (No more rooting for Houston now that they dumped Moon).
    Pittsburg(All Sports) have that 1 player that makes you mad, what did
    green do for pittsburg this past weekend ?  2 Reception he's earning
    his money...
    
    							MaB
61.719No more said....SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Sep 12 1994 13:145
    
    	Vinnie Sucks!
    
    
    		Grrrrrrr...
61.720CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Mon Sep 12 1994 13:5512
>                             -< No more said.... >-
>
>    
>    	Vinnie Sucks!
>    
>    
>    		Grrrrrrr...
>


Oh c'mon Hal....  Vinny Greenhead just lived up to the legacy of his
predecessor yesterday.......
61.721ELMAGO::BENBACANo QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque!Mon Sep 12 1994 14:161
     Yabut his predecessor has a ring  :-)
61.722plenty more to sayHBAHBA::HAASSorry, wrong species.Mon Sep 12 1994 14:1810
>                             -< No more said.... >-
>    	Vinnie Sucks!

Come on, there's blame enough to go around. How 'bout that coach that
demanded that he be given the reins, gives Bernie the boot and signs on
with a_underchiever. 

Then there's the idiot owner.

TTom
61.723ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Sep 12 1994 15:0915
    
    Re .720
    
> Oh c'mon Hal....  Vinny Greenhead just lived up to the legacy of his
> predecessor yesterday.......
    
    Huh?  Say what you will about Kosar, but he never has thrown many
    interceptions, which seems to be Vinny's primary skill (and certainly
    was the one he chose to display yesterday).
    
    I can see it now - Vinny gets pulled near the end of thee game next
    week for Rypien, then when Rypien gets injured, Vinny is released
    for "diminishing skills".
    
    Joe
61.724CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Mon Sep 12 1994 15:2417
>    
>    Huh?  Say what you will about Kosar, but he never has thrown many
>    interceptions, which seems to be Vinny's primary skill (and certainly
>    was the one he chose to display yesterday).
>    

Nope, at one point (maybe still) he was listed as the least intercepted of
all time.

I meant the bigger picture -- "loser"....


>    I can see it now - Vinny gets pulled near the end of thee game next
>    week for Rypien, then when Rypien gets injured, Vinny is released
>    for "diminishing skills".
    
That's funny Joe....8^)
61.725CNTROL::CHILDSEverybody knows this is NowhereMon Sep 12 1994 15:286
 Kosar   308 attemps without and interception
 Starr   294
 George  277 and counting........

 mike
61.726Jeff George Gunning for the recordMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Sep 12 1994 17:209
    Does Kosar have the record ?  He will throw mid 30s to low 40s on most
    giving days in Atlanta, he could actually reach him next week VS the
    Mighty KC Defense.. Id say he's in trouble KC defense is Great...
    
    He's one of the QB's I feel bad for, funny I felt bad for Dickerson
    in Indy and George in Indy ... Maybe Indy will never be a great team
    but man is Faulk fun to watch, I hope we get some live indy games on
    the Tube soon..
    								mab
61.727CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Mon Sep 12 1994 17:353
Indy will never be a great team because of how they left Baltimore.

They cursed themselves......
61.728My view of the Brown(spot)s(tm)PTOVAX::JACOBMon Sep 12 1994 19:4211
    Tee-Hee
    
    Hee-haa
    
    HAW HAW
    
    Gufaw-hahahahahahahahahahahahahah
    
    
    JaKe
    
61.729SOLANA::MAY_BRQUIET--case study in progressTue Sep 13 1994 21:377
    
    Cards win their first this week.  
    
    This is backed up by a (unneccesary) pledge to visit the crow banquet
    hall should it not happen.
    
    boC
61.730FRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Sep 13 1994 22:013
    Buddy says the Cards are playing hard, they just haven't figured out
    how to win yet.  Makes you wonder who he's gonna hire to teach them,
    and what is involved in teaching players how to win...
61.731QUASER::JACKSONTAChapter 11?Thu Sep 15 1994 14:473
      Kosar has a ring, but didn't really do anything to earn it!
    
      Tim
61.732significant actionHBAHBA::HAASSorry, wrong species.Thu Sep 15 1994 15:146
>      Kosar has a ring, but didn't really do anything to earn it!

Hail he dint! He got hisself outta Cleveburg and onto a winner's roster
in Dallas.

TTom
61.733WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Thu Sep 15 1994 15:286
    
    
       And he helped Troy put on his skirt!
    
    
    Chappy
61.734FRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Thu Sep 15 1994 17:263
    Vinny threw 4 INT's last week against Pittsburgh.  This week he faces
    the #1 defense in the NFL.  With these potent offenses, the final score
    will probably be 3-2.
61.735ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Sep 15 1994 17:418
    
>    Vinny threw 4 INT's last week against Pittsburgh.  This week he faces
>    the #1 defense in the NFL.  With these potent offenses, the final score
>    will probably be 3-2.
    
    Nah, the defenses/special teams will score more than that... B^)
    
    Joe
61.736QUASER::JACKSONTANo more notes;-(Fri Sep 16 1994 20:151
      What do you mean he got out of brownieland?  He was ousted!!!
61.737Looked good.....SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Sep 19 1994 11:435
    
    	Defense is the name of this game......32-0.
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.738PTOS01::JACOBRFollically Challenged!!Mon Sep 19 1994 14:439
    
    >>	Defense is the name of this game......32-0.
    
    
    It sorta helped the Brown(spot)s(tm) that the Cards have no offense to
    speak of.
    
    JaKe
    
61.739SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Sep 19 1994 14:585
re: Cards Offense

Great move inserting the "winner" Jim McMahon as QB.

Whatta stiff.
61.740ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Sep 19 1994 15:2318
    
    The really scarry thing is how close the game was statistically...
    
    Rushing - Arizona 17 att, 63 yds; Cleveland 27 att, 79 yards
    Passing - Arizona 255 yds, Cleveland 243 yds.
    Kick returns - Arizona 94 yds; Cleveland 43 yds.
    Fumbles lost - Arizona 0; Cleveland 1.
    Sacks - Arizona 1; Cleveland 2.
    Penalties/yards - Arizona 7/66; Cleveland 8/50.
    
    The one big difference is interception returns (Arizona 0 yds;
    Cleveland 103 yds), but take away Turner's return (and the 7 points
    that generated) and the stats look nearly the same.
    
    Testaverde had a good game, and the Browns won, but Vinny still isn't
    a decent NFL QB, and Bellichek still isn't a decent NFL coach.
    
    Joe 
61.741(8^)*PTOS01::JACOBRFollically Challenged!!Mon Sep 19 1994 15:2511
    re-.1
    
    >>Testaverde had a good game, and the Browns won, but Vinny still isn't
    >>a decent NFL QB, and Bellichek still isn't a decent NFL coach.
    
    
    And Clevescum still isn't a decent city!!!
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.742ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Sep 19 1994 16:0717
    
>    >>Testaverde had a good game, and the Browns won, but Vinny still isn't
>    >>a decent NFL QB, and Bellichek still isn't a decent NFL coach.
    
>    And Cleveland still isn't a decent city!!!
    
>    JaKe
    
    Why, JaKe, you're right.  Cleveland isn't a decent city.  It's a
    wonderful city, rebuilt anew after the turbulence and troubles
    of the 70s.  Thank you ever so much for pointing this out - it's
    a point often missed by the people of this country, particularly
    those from Pittsburgh.
    
    Joe
    
    B^)
61.743PTOS01::JACOBRFollically Challenged!!Mon Sep 19 1994 18:134
    Cleveland, the world's only inhabitated toxic waste dump.!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.744ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Sep 19 1994 19:4119
    
    Well, fine, if you're going to be that way...
    
    Back in the 70s or 80s, a fair amount of engineering work
    at Cornell went into finding a type of steel that could be 
    used in the smog & other air contamination of Pittsburgh 
    without rusting.  They found one; as a result Pittsburgh's
    structures can now look just as nice as those in the rest of
    the world.  To celebrate the discovery, a building was built
    at Cornell using the same material.  In no time, the building
    had acquired an ugly, rust tint, and remains easily the
    ugliest building on campus.  It seems that the steel was
    only of use in Pittsburgh; elsewhere the lack of air 
    contamination caused as many problems as the air contamination
    caused with regular steel in Pittsburgh.
    
    BTW - Cornell beat Princeton Saturday 27-7? (Homecoming)  Go Red!  B^)
    
    Joe
61.745ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Mon Sep 19 1994 22:043
61.746PTOS01::JACOBRFollically Challenged!!Mon Sep 19 1994 22:0816
    The air quality "problem" in Pitsburgh is a common misconception, left
    over from the days when Pittsburgh was a big producer of steel.  These
    days, there is only 1 working mill within the city limits, and only a
    few more within a 50 miles radius.  Many of the older buildings around
    here had a black tinge to them, the results fo all of the coal that the
    mills used to burn.  
    
    The air quality around here nowadays is as clean as you can find in a
    city of this size, the result of the mill that still survives adhering
    to tougher regulations, and the other mills heading south for the
    cheaper labor.  Cleveland, however, remains the mistake on the lake.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
61.747FXTROT::ALLEMANGMon Sep 19 1994 22:095
Cool.  The left and right armpits are arguing about which smells worse...

;)

61.748FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Sep 19 1994 22:091
    Now if they could only regulate the methane over Jake's house!
61.749(8^)*PTOS01::JACOBRFollically Challenged!!Mon Sep 19 1994 22:1014
    >>        <<< Note 61.745 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "Indians in 1994" >>>

    Gronowski, the only one who cain understand the following, it might
    make some sense if I'd ever met you, you a__hole.
    
    
    >>Pittsburgh - the only town where people look like bowling pins.
    
    
    You must have some fetish regarding bowling pins, what, you sitting on
    one right now, I bet!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.750ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Fri Sep 23 1994 03:4510
61.751ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Fri Sep 23 1994 03:454
61.752Schnorttt schittt SchlepppsPTOS02::JACOBRFollically Challenged!!Fri Sep 23 1994 04:077
    re.751
    
    the Brownsbackers always meet at the local sewage plant fer dinner.
    
    
    JaKe
    
61.753ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Fri Sep 23 1994 15:1012
61.754TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Sep 23 1994 15:5914
    
    
    
    	A great line in today's Boston Globe:
    
    	"Vinny Testaverde of the Bowns is the lowest-rated quarterback
         of the AFC, at 60.2. This is incredible, especially since you
         get 60 points just for signing you name to the ratings sheet."
    
    
    HAHAHAHAHA..... :-)
    
    JimH
    
61.755ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Fri Sep 23 1994 16:122
61.756Yea, rightSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Sep 23 1994 17:2513
    
    	Another funny thing is that the USA today says that Vinnie has
    	looked impressive.  
    
    		Really...???  What games has this guy watched?
    
    	The offense looked good only because the defense played great!!!
    
    	The D may well be the best the Browns have had in years.  They 
    	awesome last week!
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.757ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Fri Sep 23 1994 21:034
61.758ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Fri Sep 23 1994 21:053
61.759ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Sun Sep 25 1994 19:3124
61.760ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Mon Sep 26 1994 11:319
61.761MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Mon Sep 26 1994 12:405
    Wonder if this schmuck will still be chest-puffing in here
    when the Brownies drop below .500?  I doubt it.
    
    
    billl
61.762Schedule has been favorable... No questions thereMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Sep 26 1994 14:1615
    Ok so the browns have beat the 0-4 bengals the 0-3 cardinals and the
    1-3 Colts... Yes a combined 1-10 record, sometime the schedule goes
    against you, sometime (like this time) it doesnt.
    
    But look at it this way, with how bad there QB has played, and I think
    there #1 WR from last year (Jackson) is hurt theyve managed to go 3-1.
    
    If Jackson comes back (at 100%) and vinney turns his season around, 
    there defense and Metcalf (Special Teams/Running) could get them into
    the playoffs.
    
    Metcalf is awsome, still waiting for him to lead the league in scoring
    (One of these years)...
    
    								mab
61.763ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Mon Sep 26 1994 14:3519
61.764ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Mon Sep 26 1994 14:374
61.765don't worry, Groaner will be gone in 5 weeksFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Sep 26 1994 14:537
    Groaner predicted the Brownspots would go 15-1 last season.  He
    disappeared from SPROTS around midseason.  We were truly concerned for
    his life.  We even hired a private investigator.  Turns out he was
    hiding in under the same rock he did the season before when he bailed
    out on the Brownspots in true midseason form.
    
    Mike
61.766MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Sep 26 1994 14:5314
   Now that the Browns are 3-1 against teams that are a combined 1-10,
  I guess it's time for the Mistake On The Lake, the city that loosed
  Don King on the world, Cleveland, to stage it's annual 1/4 of the way
  into the season celebratory parade. To be followed, as sure as winter
  follows autumn, by the annual teary-eyed, bewildered, what-the-hell-
  happened, slope-shouldered walk in small circles when whatever Cleve-
  land team is in season goes down in a ball of flames. Naturally, Cleve-
  landers will be forced to hark back to over thirty years ago to the last time
  that one of their teams won a title in a major sport and cries of "Have
  the <fill in the blank> ever won a NFL championship?" will once again fill
  the air. I just love the change of seasons.

    
61.767ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Mon Sep 26 1994 15:105
61.768whatever you sayFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Sep 26 1994 15:122
    Funny how that EV5 chip comes out during the middle of every NFL
    season.
61.769My pappy has eyes24661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Sep 26 1994 15:183
    Hey Groaner...any congrats in order?
    
    Mark.
61.770MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Sep 26 1994 15:208
    
   >> Funny how that EV5 chip comes out during the middle of every NFL
   >> season.
    
     Or whenever the Cavs go into their post-season tailspin. Or when-
     ever the Indians make a run at being triple digits out of first
     place. Speaking of bandwagon jumpers, nice to see the Indians av-
     erage attendance go from 40 to 40,000 with the new stadium.
61.771Going straight for the jugularMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRMon Sep 26 1994 15:3413
re .766

>  I guess it's time for the Mistake On The Lake, the city that loosed
>  Don King on the world, Cleveland, to stage it's annual 1/4 of the way

Ohhh, Tommy, you don't pull your punches even a bit.  That's like reminding
Dallas of the School Book Depository.

Groaner, if you can handle that blow, you can handle anything.  But I wish
to hell you'd change your p-name:  every time I see it, tears well up in
my eyes.

Steve
61.772ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Mon Sep 26 1994 15:537
61.773ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Sep 26 1994 17:2827
    
>  Now that the Browns are 3-1 against teams that are a combined 1-10,
>  I guess it's time for the Mistake On The Lake, the city that loosed
>  Don King on the world, Cleveland, to stage it's annual 1/4 of the way
>  into the season celebratory parade.
    
    Huh?  Cleveland teams have not shown a tendency for fast starts &
    slow fades.  This year it looks like a possibility for the Browns;
    last year it was reality for the Browns.  Before that, it's been
    a while.
    
>  Naturally, Cleve-
>  landers will be forced to hark back to over thirty years ago to the last time
>  that one of their teams won a title in a major sport
    
    Just to nitpick...
    
    Soccer is a major sport.
    
    The Crunch won the NASL championship earlier this year.
    
    The Crunch are a soccer team.
    
    Therefore, the last time that a Cleveland team won a title in a major
    sport was 1994.
    
    Joe
61.774MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Sep 26 1994 19:027
    Nah you know better than that; soccer is not a major sport in the US;
    last I heard the US was still willing to acknowledge that Cleveland was
    part of the country. JaKester, maybe you should petition Congress to
    remedy that error.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.775RollerBrawlHBAHBA::HAASaustralopithecus westvirginiusMon Sep 26 1994 20:217
Not only is soccer not major, but there's a growing cadre of people who
seriously doubt that it's even a sport.

Now, shrink the field, give 'em something to whack each other, maybe some
motorcycles and you might have something.

TTom
61.776ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Mon Sep 26 1994 20:413
61.777FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Sep 26 1994 20:551
    Hockey is 100x more major than soccer in the U.S.
61.778ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Tue Sep 27 1994 00:347
61.779Hockey >>>>> SoccerAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneTue Sep 27 1994 10:278
    
    
      Paul....
    
     ABC does hockey and the NHL has signed to do the same type of deal
    with fox this year.  Sorry man hockey is a major sport.
    
    Jerry
61.780MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Sep 27 1994 11:3915
  >> Just to nitpick...
    
  >> Soccer is a major sport.
    
  >> The Crunch won the NASL championship earlier this year.
    
  >> The Crunch are a soccer team.
    
  >> Therefore, the last time that a Cleveland team won a title in a major
  >> sport was 1994.
    
     I suppose that if my teams had waddled in futility for the last 30
     years that I'd cling to something as tenuous as an NASL title as 
     something to be proud of. Fortunately, I ain't that hard up. 
    
61.781ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Sep 27 1994 12:0519
    
    Now wait just a second...
    
    I did _not_ say that soccer is a major sport in the US.  It isn't.
    
    But it _is_ a major sport.
    
>     I suppose that if my teams had waddled in futility for the last 30
>     years that I'd cling to something as tenuous as an NASL title as 
>     something to be proud of. Fortunately, I ain't that hard up. 
    
    It's not "hard up"; I'd certainly be a lot more excited about the
    Tribe winning a World Series, but even if the Tribe, Browns, and
    Cavs all start winning championships with regularity, I'll still be
    rooting for the Crunch as well.  You can limit your rooting to
    the sports you like; I'll limit it to those I like.  And for me, that
    includes following pro teams from NE Ohio.
    
    Joe
61.782CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Sep 27 1994 12:429
I've noticed that a lot of towns in Ohio have the word "Heights" in their
name.

Are they all like in one area that's higher than everything else?

I've always wondered about that.....


'Saw
61.783Beware nosebleeds in Cleveland Heights!!!TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinTue Sep 27 1994 13:0421
    
    
>I've noticed that a lot of towns in Ohio have the word "Heights" in their
>name.
>
>Are they all like in one area that's higher than everything else?
    
    
    	Yes 'Saw, my sister lived in Cleveland Heights for several
    years. The heights are a good 30 to 40 foot higher in elevation
    than the city of Cleveland. Fortunately it isn't high enough
    to have a view of the lake! :-)
    
    	As for the Cleveland Crunch/Major Sport topic. Somebody ought
    to cross-post that note to the ::UNAMERICAN_FOOTBALL Notesfile
    and let us all know how long it takes for the laughter to die down
    over in Europe!!!! :-)
    
    JimH
    
    
61.784Grasping Big TimeMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 27 1994 13:337
    Soccer a Major Sport, more then Hockey.. Thats a good one...
    
    So which state won the last major Tractor Pull Championship?
    
    Hey thats a major sport :-)
    
    								mab
61.785ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Sep 27 1994 13:4020
    
>    As for the Cleveland Crunch/Major Sport topic. Somebody ought
>    to cross-post that note to the ::UNAMERICAN_FOOTBALL Notesfile
>    and let us all know how long it takes for the laughter to die down
>    over in Europe!!!! :-)
    
    I guess I'm still not making myself clear.
    
    Fact #1: soccer is, within the scope of the Earth, a major sport.
    
    Fact #2: the Crunch won their soccer league this past year.
    
    Therefore, Cleveland has won a championship in a major sport recently.
    
    Now, I'm not implying that an NASL championship is any more significant
    than a Greek Basketball league championship; it isn't.
    
    But in a literal sense, the original statement was false.
    
    Joe
61.786CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Sep 27 1994 13:4720
>
>    Soccer a Major Sport, more then Hockey.. Thats a good one...
>    
>    So which state won the last major Tractor Pull Championship?
>    
>    Hey thats a major sport :-)
    

Actually, world wide, it is.  Much more than hockey.

I watched a bit of European hockey when I was in France, and the caliber
of play seemed more on par with European basketball.  It wasn't bad, it
just wasn't NHL caliber.


Funny Mab, but the way you come across, I thought for sure you'd know
all about tractor pulls and stuff like that.....8^)


'Saw
61.787Not exactly World ChampionshipBSS::MENDEZTue Sep 27 1994 14:287
    No offense Joe but the fact that cleveland won a championship in soccer
    is on par with a minor league team winning their basebal championship.
    Now if Brazil, Italy, Germany et al were involved then you would have
    something...
    
    Frank
    
61.788ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Sep 27 1994 14:4014
    
>    No offense Joe but the fact that cleveland won a championship in soccer
>    is on par with a minor league team winning their basebal championship.
    
    None taken; I mostly agree.  I still think a Greek Basketball league
    or European hockey league is a better analogy - it's the highest level
    of competition in the respective country, but clearly a step below the
    highest level of competition in the world.
    
    I was just nitpicking the original statement, which said...
    
    Oh never mind.
    
    Joe                              
61.789FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Sep 27 1994 14:434
>    Soccer (indoor) gets as much coverage on cable TV as hockey, and
>    NEITHER have a contract with a major network.  Hockey, I can see 
    
    The NHL has a contract with Fox.
61.790ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Tue Sep 27 1994 14:486
61.791MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 27 1994 15:1712
    (saw) I can one honestly say Ive never, ever watched a Truck/tractor
    or skateboard pull of any size shape or color, never went to a monster
    truck rally, never seen soccer live either.
    
    It pretty much a givin that the 4 major sports are Football/baseball
    Hockey/basketball.  Thats a given, and when someone in the states says
    major sport they mean those 4 sports ONLY....
    
    So trying to bring in soccer is like trying to bring in truck pulls
    the 4 major sports are the only major sports in this country..
    
    								mab
61.792CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Sep 27 1994 15:3919
>    
>    It pretty much a givin that the 4 major sports are Football/baseball
>    Hockey/basketball.  Thats a given, and when someone in the states says
>    major sport they mean those 4 sports ONLY....
>    
>    So trying to bring in soccer is like trying to bring in truck pulls
>    the 4 major sports are the only major sports in this country..
>    


Given says who?  And can you speak for Everyman?  Gawd I hope not....

Those four sports are major in the US, and perhaps Canada.  Can you
say that they are major in Europe or the Far East?  I think not.

I've never seen a truck pull either.... well, wait a minute.  I did
use my truck to pull some stumps once.  Does that count?


61.793Auto Racing?PTOS01::SCHRAMMETue Sep 27 1994 15:416
    
    
    I heard/read somewhere that Auto Racing is the largest (or followed the
    most) sport in the World?  Any ideas?
    
    Eric
61.794FXTROT::ALLEMANGTue Sep 27 1994 15:546

And don't forget the #1 participant sport in the US -- bowling.

MB's youthful exuberance is not only entertaining, but it makes me
appreciate something that comes with age... perspective.
61.795CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Sep 27 1994 15:5917
>MB's youthful exuberance is not only entertaining, but it makes me
>appreciate something that comes with age... perspective.


One thing that really opened my eyes was spending that 6 months in 
France.  

It's interesting to see how we (Americans) are perceived through others
eyes, and see that as much as we might like to think it, we're not the
only place in the world.

Age has helped too.  As I've stated in here before, I grew more after
30 than before.  Blows me away too, when I think back on it....


Mab is still wet behind the ears.....

61.796What was the over/under? 15 roots???TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinTue Sep 27 1994 16:1216
    
    
>I've never seen a truck pull either.... well, wait a minute.  I did
>use my truck to pull some stumps once.  Does that count?
    
    
    	That depends. Did anybody put 10 bucks down on the stump
    to win????
    
    	(The above question is purely hyperthetical, and is not to
    be interpreted as an endorsement of waggering on either
    truck-pulling, stump-pulling, or any other kind of *-pulling)
    
    JimH
    
    
61.797WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Sep 27 1994 16:4114
    
    
         MAB may be wet behind the ears. Hell he might even be wet between
    his legs? ;-) But the 4 major sports in the USA are Basketball,
    Baseball, football, and Hockey. Dream all you want about Soccer but it
    is not that popular in the USA. So that being said when an AMERICAN
    says the 4 major sports! Chances are he is talking about the
    aforementioned 4 sports.
    
           Now if you wanna move to France or TimBukToo or any other place
    in this world other than the USA you can claim Soccer as being one of
    the major sports.
    
    Chappy
61.798SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Sep 27 1994 16:4611
|Given says who?  And can you speak for Everyman?  Gawd I hope not....

He cain't even speak for himself.  (ISFH)

I don't think any of the "other" sports, including soccer are trying
to be American "major" sports.  They realize that Americans have more
disposable income than anywehre else, and if they can find a niche for
their sports, they will do all right.

=Bob=
61.799MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Sep 27 1994 16:478
    
      You are 100% correct, Chappy. And so is M_Air. We ain't
     talking about the major sports in some gad forsaken place
     where you can't even get a decent cheeseburger and fries.
     We're talking about the US of A and it says right here 
     that soccer and especially NASL soccer ain't not a "major"
     sport in this here country. Hell, I honestly thought that
     the NASL was defunct.
61.800CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Sep 27 1994 16:4716
>                   -< What was the over/under? 15 roots??? >-

>    
>    
>    	That depends. Did anybody put 10 bucks down on the stump
>    to win????
>    
>    	(The above question is purely hyperthetical, and is not to
>    be interpreted as an endorsement of waggering on either
>    truck-pulling, stump-pulling, or any other kind of *-pulling)
>    


No, but my dad bet me $5 the chain would break.  Does that count?    
    

61.801ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Sep 27 1994 16:5929
    
    I think I smell a rathole...
    
    Just to investigate further...
    
    IMHO, major team sports include (on a world wide basis):
    
    Baseball
    American Football
    Soccer
    Basketball
    Hockey
    
    Major individual sports include:
    
    Auto Racing
    Bowling
    Golf
    Tennis
    
>    We're talking about the US of A 
    
    Well, see, that's the problem.  You didn't say "major US sport",
    so I assumed, for lack of a restricting adjective, you were
    refering to major sports around the world.
    
    It all depends upon your perspective...
    
    Joe
61.802CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Sep 27 1994 17:1326
You guys are such a bunch of weenies.

You're all shuckin' and jivin' here, talkin' about major sports in America,
and what an American means when he says major sports.  It's really all
quite laughable.

If you guy had any 'nads, you'd belly up to the bar and go absolute.  But
when someone does that on you, you start tap-dancin' and qualifyin' your
statements.

It's quite funny.

Mab's over there squeezin' his brain real hard hopin' somethign resemblin'
logic will pop out.

Chappy's tellin' me I'm un-A-mer-uh-can because I've got a world view.

Tommy, my most worthy opponent, is talkin' about french fries...


I'm rolling!

'Saw



61.803From my perspective.....socker...smockerSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Sep 27 1994 17:1762


		                      ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                                    /            
                            /\^^^^^^
                            \_______________

                           *C*L*E*V*E*L*A*N*D*
    
    			       *D*A*W*G*S*

    
    
    
    
    	An inside look at the Browns....by Hal (BIG DAWG) Whitehair:
    
    		After 4 weeks in this young NFL season, the Cleveland
    	Browns have recored 3 victorys and 1 giveaway.  The Browns 
    	defense is the name of the game in Cleveland.  The Browns have
    	allowed the least amount of points in the NFL.  Led by the best
    	line in the league, Michael Dean Perry, the All Pro defensive
    	linemen and Pepper Johnson, All Pro Linebacker, the DAWGS have
    	stopped all running backs that have tried to penitrate the line.
    	Foster-held to less than 80 yards.....Faulk-held to less than
    	60 yards.....and the list could continue.  Credit these two men
    	for the stopage at the line.  The Browns secondary has improved
    	greatly over the last two years with Turner and newly drafted
    	Antonio Langman (sp).  These two have combined for 5 INTS so far
    	this year.  The Browns have gone back to man on man coverage this
    	year and these guys are the reason why.  The DAWGS have ruled
    	the league so far this year.
    
    	The offense has played spendedly the last two weeks and seem to
    	be jelling as a unit.  Michael Jackson is still injured and hasn't
    	played the last two games but others have rissen to the occasion...
    	ie:  Hoard, Vardell, Metcalf just to name a few.  The offense is
    	now being ran by an official offensive coordinator and not the 
    	head coach this year, and from what has been shown....for the good.
    	It appears that Vinnie, when on his mark, can pick apart a defense
    	like the best of them.  The way of the offense is through their
    	backfield.  More passes have been thrown to the back than the 
    	wide receivers.  I have no problem whti this.........it has
    	produced!
    
    	Special Teams:  Best in the League....
    
    	The Jets are beat up and the Browns are ready to explode again.
    	With the game being at home, I hold little chance for the Jets
    	to rebound against the DAWGS in the pound.
    
    	on to 4-1 and an AMERICAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE CENTRAL DIVISION TITLE.
    
    	GO BROWNS!!	
    
    		WOOF!
    
    
61.804Nice...........WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Sep 27 1994 17:2213
    
    
       I never said you was unamerican? I think those novels you read have
    your mind a little foggy and you think your Albert Sweitzer but.....
    
    
         I too have been to France as well as England, Denmark,Norway,Germany
    And About 90% of Central and South America. And I'm only 29 (wow). And
    the way people in France think about Americans...... lets just say they
    are not a good example.
    
    
    Chap
61.805Hey HAL - JoJ you're not...SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Sep 27 1994 17:330
61.806MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Sep 27 1994 17:4715
    
    re .802
    
     You were sleeping in class again. To recap for you (and anyone
    else who was not paying attention), remarks were made about how
    the city of Cleveland had not had a champion in a major sport in
    over 30 years. One of our Clevelanders piped up that so and so of
    the NASL had won the league title last year thus refuting my claim.
    The argument then ensued whether soccer and/or the NASL constituted
    a major sport. Valid arguments were made on both sides. Then you 
    piped in about your broadening experiences in France and of how 
    narrow minded we ugly Americans were and had a good little snicker 
    to yourself and thus dragged another thought provoking and informative
    discussion into another discourse about yourself and your past ex-
    periences which had little or nothing to do with the topic at hand.
61.807Pats could have played Langham and not signed that stiff ReynoldsTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodTue Sep 27 1994 18:147
    To tell you the truth, I would have preferred that the Patriots drafted
    Langham rather than Willie (my hamstring's hurt again) McGinest.
    
    Despite the success of the team, Parcell's 1994 draft will live in
    infamy as the worst in Patriots history.
    
    NAZZ
61.808:-) :-) :-) :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 27 1994 18:2222
    Maybe my logic is messed up saw, so I guess when an american talks to
    you about the 4 major sports soccer comes in your mind, ok thats fine
    but when an american makes a statement about the (4) major sports I
    being the Un=Intelegent person you claim me to be thinks for the 4
    major sports, the only major sports.  Now if someone from the other
    side of the lake makes the statement I may have to think about what
    they were talking about..
    
    hey joe I dont have to remind you what assume means ....
    
    If someone had the money to start up a decent american football league
    in Europe it would take over, american football is more manly (rougher)
    then soccer football and seeing how violent soccer fans are they would
    love american football (How do ticket sales do when the NFL has games
    over there ??).
    
    Ok all you Noters out there, you must now (for cam and joe's benefit)
    explain to everyone what the major sports here in america are, you
    can no longer assume that all noters in here have the knowledge of
    what the major sports are... Dont ASSUME cam knows anything...
    
    								mab
61.809GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsTue Sep 27 1994 18:262
    
    	Cam Neely notes in here?
61.810ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Sep 27 1994 18:4624
    
    Cam Neely a Browns fan?  Neat... B^)
    
>    Ok all you Noters out there, you must now (for cam and joe's benefit)
>    explain to everyone what the major sports here in america are, you
>    can no longer assume that all noters in here have the knowledge of
>    what the major sports are...
    
    You don't have to explain to me what the major US sports are; with
    the exception of hockey, which is borderline, I think everyone in
    here would pretty well agree.
    
    You just have to say "US" (or United States, or USA, or America, or
    whatever else will clarify the situation) if you mean major US
    sports, and not major sports.
    
    But, just to make everyone comfortable with their own perspective,
    I'll assume you, and Chappy, and Mr. Byrdie all implying US when I 
    see the words "major sport".
    
    Everyone happy now?  B^)
    
    Joe
    
61.811Of Eagle Hockey fame(since hockey nicknames are in)25022::BREENTue Sep 27 1994 19:226
    I kinda like that "Cam" Way monniker.  But I like "Snooks" even better.
    
    (Sometime I'm gonna have to meet ol' Cam/Snooks/Frank  Way (almost did
    last year when my car overheated in Conn. - he almost had houseguests)
    
    billte
61.812GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsTue Sep 27 1994 20:034
    
    	I thought 'Saw's nickname was Pookie?
    
    Claybone
61.813ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Sep 28 1994 02:285
61.814yesSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Sep 28 1994 10:2419
    
    	CLEVELAND	CLEVELAND	CLEVELAND	CLEVELAND
    
    	Yes, the Browns appear to have an easy game this weekend against
    	the Jets.  With the Jets starting quarterback out the DAWGS front
    	line will be putting lots of pressure on the QB and will more 
    	than likely grab a couple out of the air.
    
    	Quarterback Vinnie was reported as saying..."To hell with all you
    	nonbelievers, we are your next Supper Bowl Champions!" as he held
    	his index finger in the air.
    
    	Eric Metcalf added..."I wana play that bowling pin team agan."
    	refering to the Pittsquerb Squeelers....
    
    	Go DAWGS!
    
    
    		WOOF!
61.815CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sWed Sep 28 1994 11:4536
>     You were sleeping in class again. To recap for you (and anyone
>    else who was not paying attention), remarks were made about how
>    the city of Cleveland had not had a champion in a major sport in
>    over 30 years. One of our Clevelanders piped up that so and so of
>    the NASL had won the league title last year thus refuting my claim.
>    The argument then ensued whether soccer and/or the NASL constituted
>    a major sport. Valid arguments were made on both sides. Then you 
>    piped in about your broadening experiences in France and of how 
>    narrow minded we ugly Americans were and had a good little snicker 
>    to yourself and thus dragged another thought provoking and informative
>    discussion into another discourse about yourself and your past ex-
>    periences which had little or nothing to do with the topic at hand.


And you're engaging in revisionist history.

I was responding to all the bullshit about American Major sports.  No
one limited the discussion early on to American when referring to "major
sports".

I used France as an example of a broadened view, and of course, in regard
to the people I was referring to, they are narrow minded.

As to the discussion being thought provoking, why don't I bring in a plate
of shit and set it in front of us....that would be about as thought provoking
as the discussion was.


You'll have to try harder next time.....







61.816PTOS01::JACOBRSick as a Dog!!!Wed Sep 28 1994 11:479
    RE "Major Sports"
    
    In Clevescum, pud pulling is considered a mojor sport, played
    intramurally between the companies there.
    
    Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
    
    JaKe
    
61.817CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sWed Sep 28 1994 12:1055
>
>    Maybe my logic is messed up saw, so I guess when an american talks to
>    you about the 4 major sports soccer comes in your mind, ok thats fine
>    but when an american makes a statement about the (4) major sports I
>    being the Un=Intelegent person you claim me to be thinks for the 4
>    major sports, the only major sports.  Now if someone from the other
>    side of the lake makes the statement I may have to think about what
>    they were talking about..

I never said soccer came to mind.  I just said that soccer is a major
sport outside of the US.

I learned a long time ago to never fill in the blanks based on someone's
nationality.  I'd give you some examples of why, but I don't want to
turn Tommy's stomach with my personal experiences.


>    
>    If someone had the money to start up a decent american football league
>    in Europe it would take over, american football is more manly (rougher)
>    then soccer football and seeing how violent soccer fans are they would
>    love american football (How do ticket sales do when the NFL has games
>    over there ??).
>    

They tried it, remember -- WLAF, and the attendance wasn't that great.

And I wish I had saved them, but our little town newspaper had a series
of articles about 8 years ago, by a guy from town (former football player
and coach) who was living in England and coaching a team in their local
American football league.   The english didn't enjoy playing it that
much -- believe it or not, most of the them preferred rugby, and their
attitude towards the game was take it or leave it.

The Germans I've talked to abhor baseball (no surprise their) and their
main complaint with American football is there's too many breaks in the
action.


But I gather you've conducted a study of what Europeans like, so I
probably stand corrected.  And without Tommy's permission to talk about
personal experiences, I guess I don't have the proverbial leg to stand on.



>    Ok all you Noters out there, you must now (for cam and joe's benefit)
>    explain to everyone what the major sports here in america are, you
>    can no longer assume that all noters in here have the knowledge of
>    what the major sports are... Dont ASSUME cam knows anything...
    
If you can explain something so that most of us in here can understand
it without resorting to decoder rings -- go for it....



61.818CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sWed Sep 28 1994 12:1210
>    
>    (Sometime I'm gonna have to meet ol' Cam/Snooks/Frank  Way (almost did
>    last year when my car overheated in Conn. - he almost had houseguests)
>    
>    billte

You should have stopped by -- I always have beer in the fridge, and there's
lots of stories we could have swapped.....


61.819CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sWed Sep 28 1994 12:1315
>    
>    	I thought 'Saw's nickname was Pookie?
>    
>    Claybone


Huh?


The only other nickname I have besides 'Saw, which is mostly only used by
you folks, is "NF".


'Saw

61.820Soccer is pool on a fieldMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Sep 28 1994 12:248
    Well Rugby is to football what football is to soccer... NOW THATS A
    MANLY SPORT...
    
    I dont know how those guys survive, 
        (In my best Bevis&Butthead Voice)
    	RUGBY haha Thats Cool
    
    								mab
61.821The Central is there for the Taken, will cleveland do itMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Sep 28 1994 12:3431
    Now about the Browns, even the most decorated Anti Browns fans have to
    admit the Browns should make the playoffs this year.  Hosting NY Jets
    without there starting QB should be a win (Id prefer the jets win :-).)
    
    Then clevland has a bye week after which they play Houston, Cinncy,
    Denver and then THE MIGHTY PATS.  If they beat NY (Very Possible/and
    probable) they will be 4-1.  Those next 4 games are all WINNABLE (
    except of course the pats game).  But come on now, seeing the browns
    at 7-2 is not a stretch of the imagination at this point.  but then
    there schedule get DIFFICULT (Philly, KC, Hou, NYG, DAL, Pitt and Sea)
    Can they win 3+ of those games is the question, 9 wins will not
    guarentee them a playoff spot.  The Houston games will be huge,
    Cleveland Defense is very good (Even if there offense is medioca at
    best).  But Cody Carlson may have problems VS Cleveland's Defense, a 
    sweep of Houston could land them the division, granted its the weakist
    division in football, but who's watching :-).
    
    I think my sorrow for the Cleveland Fans who have watched there teams
    come so close and lose (Like the Cavs who get major injuries every
    year) has flowed over to football.  Houston dont deserve the division
    after letting moon go, cinncy is a joke (Although getting better).  And
    at this point Id rather see Cleveland then PITTSBURG !!! (Thats a hard
    statement to make).
    
    Good Luck Hal, any cleveland team needs luck... They should have kept
    bernie, with there defense, Bernie, a healthy Michael Jackson, and 
    ERIC METCALF they would be a lock for the central (The Moonless Cent)
    But Vinny may be what stop's Cleveland from going anywhere this year.
    (Cleveland should have made a run at MOON).
    
    								mab
61.822CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sWed Sep 28 1994 12:4017
>    Well Rugby is to football what football is to soccer... NOW THATS A
>    MANLY SPORT...
>
>    I dont know how those guys survive, 
>        (In my best Bevis&Butthead Voice)
>    	RUGBY haha Thats Cool
    
It does have its moments, but also remember that while you do try to
hit as hard as you can, you don't get that air of invincibility that
you have with pads on.

Your first shoulder separation from shoulder tackling someone reminds you
of that....  Rugby has more shoulder injuries than knee injuries which
is unlike football.


'Saw
61.823FORTY2::FOWLERMIn Bigshorts We TrustWed Sep 28 1994 13:036
In Rugby League the players wear shoulder pads, although not on the same scale
as your football players. It's only in Union where the tradition is not to
protect yourself. Rugby League is consequently a vastly superior spectator sport
if you likebig hits and crunching tackles. 8-)

Mike
61.824CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sWed Sep 28 1994 13:1117
>
>In Rugby League the players wear shoulder pads, although not on the same scale
>as your football players. It's only in Union where the tradition is not to
>protect yourself. Rugby League is consequently a vastly superior spectator sport
>if you likebig hits and crunching tackles. 8-)
>


Rugby League is for wusses who whore themselves out for money 8^) 8^)


Actually, the way it is described to me, League is closer to American
football than it is to rugby.  I guess you could say it is midway
between in terms of evolution....


'Saw
61.825ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Sep 28 1994 14:185
61.826MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Sep 28 1994 14:4816
  >> I was responding to all the <beep> about American Major sports.  No
  >> one limited the discussion early on to American when referring to "major
  >> sports".
     
     Apparently, some things aren't as intuitively obvious to some as they
     are to others. I certainly wouldn't have thought that we were referring
     to something so generic as 'major' sports on a worldwide scale or else
     the list would be endless. And there's really no need for the ugly
     scatalogical references. Not only are they crude and tasteless but
     they diminish the entire conference.




    
61.827major sportBSS::MENDEZWed Sep 28 1994 15:336
    BTW
    When talking major sport;  You should also mention Golf.  It was 
    reported that Golf is the most popular participatory sport by
    americans.  And everyone knows that the best in Golf is from 
    outside of the US of A.
    
61.828CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sWed Sep 28 1994 15:4620
>     the list would be endless. And there's really no need for the ugly
>     scatalogical references. Not only are they crude and tasteless but
>     they diminish the entire conference.

A picture is worth a thousand words and one man's sh*t is another man's
treasure....


I was responding to the implication that soccer was not a major sport,
not that it wasn't a major sport in America, or Sri Lanka, or
Newcastle-Upon-Tyne...  That's what the note I responded to said.


Sorry if I'm not the Amazing Kreskin.....




    

61.829FORTY2::FOWLERMIn Bigshorts We TrustThu Sep 29 1994 10:1213
'Saw,

The only real difference between rugby league and rugby union is that league has
less players, and instead of having to release the ball as in union, you are
allowed six "tackles" to progress the ball up the field. When you get tackled
for the sixth time you have to hand over possession, so it is normal to kick the
ball upfield after the 5th tackle. League is much faster and more free flowing.
It's nothin like American football really.

The only other difference, and it is a monumental one, is that league is played
in the north of england, and union in the south.

Mike
61.830CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sThu Sep 29 1994 12:039
>The only other difference, and it is a monumental one, is that league is played
>in the north of england, and union in the south.

I hear you on that.

Also, don't League players get a salary?


'Saw
61.831FORTY2::FOWLERMJubileeThu Sep 29 1994 12:455
Yes, but I don't think they're all that well paid. Many of the less well-known
players are part-time, and it's only big stars like Offiah, Hanley, and now
Scott Quinnell that I'd guess were rich.

Mike
61.832CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sThu Sep 29 1994 13:1917
>
>Yes, but I don't think they're all that well paid. Many of the less well-known
>players are part-time, and it's only big stars like Offiah, Hanley, and now
>Scott Quinnell that I'd guess were rich.

Oh.....


And moving back in a Cleveland vein there was a great line on Imus this morning
about Michael Fay, the infamous "canee" from Ohio.  They said that he
had a butane sniffing problem.  Bernard piped up and said, hey, if you were 
from Ohio you'd have a butane sniffing problem too....

Had me peein' my paints!


'Saw
61.833I GUESS YOU HAD TO BE THERECNTROL::CHILDSShe was a TWO-BaggerThu Sep 29 1994 14:032

61.834SOLANA::MAY_BRQUIET--case study in progressThu Sep 29 1994 15:049
  >       <<< Note 61.831 by FORTY2::FOWLERM "Jubilee" >>>
  >
  >  Yes, but I don't
  >  think they're all that well paid. Many of the less well-knownplayers
  >  are part-time, and it's only big stars like Offiah, Hanley, and
  >  nowScott Quinnell that I'd guess were rich.Mike
    
    Stop hiding out here in Cleveland and get over to the boxing note so
    that you can take your punishment like a man.
61.835MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Sep 29 1994 15:2332
    
  >> Stop hiding out here in Cleveland and get over to the boxing note so
  >> that you can take your punishment like a man.
    
     Yes, remember this gem from the keyboard of one Mike Fowler (see
     below)? Pay particular attention to the title of the note. And now 
     consider that in the last month alone, Nigel Benn needed a very dodgy
     decision to beat a journeyman/nobody/complete stiff and then 
     Lennox Lewis gets his clock cleaned by a man whose prior (and only)
     claim to fame was that he was a sparring partner for Mike Tyson. I 
     hesitate to say that this marks the sad decline of British boxing 
     because none of those fighters merited all of that chest puffing to 
     begin with. Still, Mike don't you wish that you had fighters like
     Roy Jones, James Toney, Pernell Whittaker, Buddy McGirt, etc., etc.,
     etc.
    
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 67.162                   Official Boxing Topic                   162 of 602
FORTY2::FOWLERM "Workers of the world unite"          8 lines   2-NOV-1993 04:45
                    -< The sad decline of American boxing >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does this mean that of the three world heavyweight titles, two are now held by
"englishmen"? Excellent. Any time you chaps over the pond want some tips, don't
hesitate to ask. 8-)

You used to be the best but now you can only dream of having boxers like Chris
Eubank, Lennox Lewis, etc. Still at least you've got Riddick "Fat Boy" Bowe. 8-)

Mike
    
61.836METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Sep 29 1994 16:476
re: Imus

Reverend Billy Sol Harkness is BACK!

The Crazy Met

61.837FORTY2::FOWLERMJubileeFri Sep 30 1994 08:3012
re:-2

Curses, found out at last. We've still got Chris Eubank though. Hmmmm, on second
thoughts, forget I said that. I think Henry Wharton will smack Eubank in
December.

Lewis wasn't English anyway. You wait 'till Bruno fights McCall.

Surely this marks the decline of boxing as a whole, not just English boxing.
Toney is great but there's not much else around.

Mike
61.838WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Fri Sep 30 1994 10:237
    
    
    
        Oh so now Lewis isn't English. You Brit's slay me....
    
    
    Chap
61.839O'Donnell and Klingler SUCK!ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Sep 30 1994 11:298
61.840WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Fri Sep 30 1994 11:447
    
    
       Extract that one Boys it will be fun to repost it. :-)
    
    
    
    Chap
61.841Backing up a couple of ratholes...MUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Sep 30 1994 11:4521
This is a bit old hat by now, but I haven't been in the office
since Monday.

re .799
    
>      You are 100% correct, Chappy. And so is M_Air. We ain't
>     talking about the major sports in some gad forsaken place
>     where you can't even get a decent cheeseburger and fries.

Tommy, I don't know of such a place.  American football may not
have conquered the world (actually, they got pretty good crowds
for the Waffle in London, Barcelona, and Frankfurt), but the
hamburger most definitely has.  Fear not: wherever you may
travel, you are never far from the next Burger King or Macdonald's.
And most steak houses (no longer a largely British/American
phenomenon here in Europe) will serve you a burger that is
considerably better than fast-food quality.

Do not despair.

Steve
61.842CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sFri Sep 30 1994 12:047
And besides, while I didn't like a lot of France, their fries are EXCELLENT.


Steven, do you know a guy named Jim Egerton?


'Saw
61.843And there Shakes were Like water...WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Fri Sep 30 1994 12:298
    
    
       funny, I went to A Macdonalds in Paris, and had the worst BigMac I
    ever tasted. Brown lettuce, Sticky Special sauce and everything!!!
    
    
    
    Chap
61.844CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sFri Sep 30 1994 12:3218
>                    -< And there Shakes were Like water... >-
>    
>       funny, I went to A Macdonalds in Paris, and had the worst BigMac I
>    ever tasted. Brown lettuce, Sticky Special sauce and everything!!!
    

The one in Evry wasn't bad, but you're closer to the mark.  They're
not that great in the burger department.

I didn't like steak in France either -- I like mine medium, and all of their
stuff comes out exceedingly rare (like waved over the flame three times)....


But there was other food that was delish, especially out in Normandy....


'Saw

61.845Food in France is worth its own NotesfileMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Sep 30 1994 13:2424
>	Steven, do you know a guy named Jim Egerton?
>	'Saw


No.  Should I?

Re: last 2 or so.  No offense intended, but if you're in France and
the best place you can find to eat is Macdonald's, then you just
aren't paying attention.

Anyway, I'm a Burger King man myself.

'Saw, I like a good rare steak, and some of the best I've had have been
in France.  But it is now much easier to get a good steak in Germany, as
a number of chains have spread across the country that use Argentine
beef (German cows do pushups).

Right now, I'm looking forward to getting to California, where I can
get a good fresh green salad and visit a good Jewish delicatessen.

I'll drop in here about 1800 (1 PM EDT) for a last look around.

Steve
61.846METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleFri Sep 30 1994 13:466
> I'll drop in here about 1800 (1 PM EDT) for a last look around.

Are you back on Standard time??

The Crazy Met

61.847CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sFri Sep 30 1994 13:4841
|>	Steven, do you know a guy named Jim Egerton?
|>	'Saw
|
| 
|No.  Should I?

He's a guy I used to work with (brilliant guy) here who's been on 
an international relo over in Munich for about he past 4/5 years.
He does a lot with manufacturing software....


>
>'Saw, I like a good rare steak, and some of the best I've had have been
>in France.  But it is now much easier to get a good steak in Germany, as
>a number of chains have spread across the country that use Argentine
>beef (German cows do pushups).
>

Ja, das DeutscheCow is moosle-bounden  8^)

Yeah, France can be cool if you like it really rare.  I like mine a little
more towards medium.

One thing I liked about Germany was the preponderance of other kinds of
meat to eat.  I mean, here in America, beef is basically your primary
meat, but in Germany (well, Munich is all I know) other meat seemed more
prevalent.   I've always liked German food.


>Right now, I'm looking forward to getting to California, where I can
>get a good fresh green salad and visit a good Jewish delicatessen.

We have some great Jewish delis here in CT too.

>I'll drop in here about 1800 (1 PM EDT) for a last look around.

Have a great vacation, and we expect a trip report when you get back....


have fun,
'Saw
61.848WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Fri Sep 30 1994 14:5213
    
    
       You haven't tasted meat til ya eat Monkey in Panama!!!! MMMMM
    
    
    
          Oh BTW we are in the Cleveland Note so I'll mention them too.
    I've never been to Cleveland but I here it's nice.
    
                     NOT!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    Chap
61.849I think they'll make the offs (should win div)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Sep 30 1994 15:269
    Well I for one will not rag on the Brown spots this year, there season
    was helped more by Houston then anyone else, releasing moon sealed
    there fate and opened the doors for Cleveland.  Metcalf is the only
    player on the team I enjoy watching but thats ok, RB's are awsome..
    
    Of course the odds of the dogs beating anyone in the playffs is slim
    and none :-)
    
    								mab
61.850FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Sep 30 1994 15:274
    Don't bother to save Groaner's note to repost it.  He'll be gone in a
    few weeks and won't be back until training camp next year.
    
    Mike
61.851Not goodbye, just auf WiedersehenMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Sep 30 1994 16:2623
TCM: yes, we go onto standard time the weekend after the fall equinox
and onto daylight time the weekend after the spring equinox.  This makes
a perfect time window to travel to the States, I only jump 8 time zones
instead of 9 and I get an additional 25-hour day when the States convert.

'Saw: depending on how long ago you were here, you might not recognize
German cooking.  Actually, the old traditions are still alive (here in
Bavaria, they eat parts of pigs I didn't even know existed), but they've
been expanded considerably by exposure to the rest of Europe and the
world.

Chap: I was in Cleveland once in my life, back in 1965.  I was not
exactly enthralled, but I understand the city has undergone quite
a renewal over the last 10 years or so.  And they've got a new ball
park.

All: yeah, you'll get a trip report.  Day 1: lay on backside.  Day 2:
spend $400 at Super-Crown.  Day 3: lay on backside.  Day 4: watched
fights on ESPN.  Day 5: lay on backside.  Day 6...

Hope like hell you're all still there when I get back.

Steve
61.852ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Sep 30 1994 17:185
61.853PTOS02::JACOBRBack among the livingFri Sep 30 1994 18:489
    .839 is one of the funniest things I've read.  Has anybody ever seen
    Groaner and HAL in the same place at the same time????
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
    
    Clevescum S U C K S !!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.854PTOS02::JACOBRBack among the livingFri Sep 30 1994 18:5811
    Lessee Groaner, seeing as Testicleverde is only good fer about 4 decent
    games a year, and he's wasted 2 or 3 of those in the early going, looks
    like he'll be back to playing "Mr. Interception" again in a week or
    two, and then the rest of the Brown(spot)s(tm) will succumb to the
    sludge of Clevescum, and the 'SPots will finish about 8-8.
    
    Gots a p-name that says the STEELERS finish higher ranked than the
    Spots, Groaner.
    
    JaKe
    
61.855ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Sep 30 1994 19:094
61.856PTOS02::JACOBRBack among the livingFri Sep 30 1994 19:155
    You'll have to wear the p_name fer a week, and enter at least one note
    per day, okay??
    
    JaKe
    
61.857B^)ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Fri Sep 30 1994 20:0410
    
    Just saw your pool entry, JaKe - picking the Browns and giving
    points?  My, my, my... guess you must have more confidence in
    Testaverde than you let on...
    
    Who knows... maybe JaKe's Clevelandphilic, but in denial... the
    deepest skeleton in his closet a Browns jacket with the number
    #19 on the back...
    
    Joe
61.859PTOS02::JACOBRBack among the livingFri Sep 30 1994 20:2310
    
    Nah, just that the Jests are without Boomer and, face it, the Jests do
    SUCK, and Clevescum is on a <minor> roll, so had to go with my HAID
    instead of my heart.  I'd love to see the skidmarks lose, but they'll
    probably win.  Plus, it's being played in Clevescum, and a lot of teams
    have so much trouble playing there in the sludge pit, what with the
    stench of the stadium, and the dawg(pig) pound.
    
    JaKe
    
61.860FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingSat Oct 01 1994 06:433
    re: p-name bet
    
    That's one way to get Groaner to participate in here after October.
61.861ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sat Oct 01 1994 18:417
61.8624-1 and rising...ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Oct 02 1994 23:082
61.863one of only 3 teams with 4 wins....MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Oct 03 1994 18:297
    I bet all eye's will be on MNF tonight, if Houston can come out on top
    the Browns will have a 2 game lead going into the bye week... There
    schedule come back to reality after the bye week, have to wait and see.
    
    the Moonless Oilers S#$%* Big time...
    									mab
    
61.864PTOS02::JACOBRBack among the livingMon Oct 03 1994 18:4111
    The Brown(spot)s(tm) have played 5 games, are 4 and 1, and have only
    faced one decent team, to whom they lost.  They'll come back down to
    earth fast.
    
    Twas sickening watching Eric Metcalf swapping slobber with the idjuts
    in the Pig Pound after scoring yesterday.  Weird, but seems he "scored"
    twice on that play, once with the TD, and once with them weirdos beyond
    the end zone.
    
    JaKe
    
61.865metCalf RULES in CLEVELANDMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Oct 03 1994 18:465
    Now come on even anit browns fan have to recognize decent talant.
    I think Metcalf is one of the only highlights on the team, Id love
    to see him... Say in NEW ENGLAND :-)
    
    								mab
61.866PTOS02::JACOBRBack among the livingMon Oct 03 1994 18:498
    re.865
    
    I din't say he had no talent, I just said it was sickening watching him
    swap slobber wif the Pig Pound.  Nexted thing ya knwo, he'll be on the
    field with a leftover Bernice dress.
    
    JaKe
    
61.867ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Oct 03 1994 19:1742
    
    For those who think some in here are overly optimistic about
    the Browns' prospects, I'll present the following excerpt from
    the Cleveland Sports Mailing List...
    
>    Well, the Browns future looks real good; here's the breakdown:
>
>    **Record        **Opponent              **Summary
>    4-1             at Houston 1-3          EZ win. Nuff said.
>    5-1             Bungles 0-5             Trounce.
>    6-1             at Denver 0-4           Sorry Elway, you have no
>    support.
>    7-1             at Patriots 3-2         Tuff game, Big-D comes through.
>
>    after game in New England the Browns are 8-1.
>
>    8-1             at Phili 3-1            Lose a close one.
>    8-2             at KC                   Marty ball fails at home.
>    9-2             Houston                 Crushing win.
>    10-2            Giants                  Bellichick beats old team.
>    11-2            at Dallas               Not likely.  Where's Kosar?
>    11-3            at Steelers             You suck!  Browns make up
>    earlier loss.
>    12-3            Seattle                 Home victory.
>
>    Browns finish regular season 13-3.
>
>    Win Central Division.  Meet, and beat, Miami for AFC Championship.
>    Meet and lose to Dallas in the Super Bowl.
    
    Despite the prediction of some (JaKe), I'm now convinced that the
    Browns _can_ make the playoffs.  The defense has come together
    well, and the offense has enough weapons to pull a few wins out.
    
    I will give Belichek this much - since he's arrived, the Browns
    have drafted well.  I still can't stand him, and do _not_ want
    him to continue as head coach, because even if things break just
    right this year (see above) I'm not at all convinced that it will
    help next year.  But we're likely stuck with him for another year
    at least.  B^(
    
    Joe
61.868PTOS02::JACOBRBack among the livingMon Oct 03 1994 19:224
    Sounds like that "newsletter" is written by HAL.
    
    JaKe
    
61.869SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Oct 03 1994 19:376
|    Sounds like that "newsletter" is written by HAL.

Beat me to it, JaKe.

Actually, it will be interesting to see what happens with Pitt/Houston
tonight.  Could be that the Browns may be the best in the AFC Central.
61.87013-3 ??? Puh-leeeeeze.FXTROT::ALLEMANGMon Oct 03 1994 19:464
Sounds like acid sales are soaring in Cleveland...  


61.871ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 03 1994 20:334
61.872too funnyFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 03 1994 21:154
    Groaner predicted 15-1 last year.  He disappeared before Veteran's Day.
    I don't even think Clevescum made the playoffs.
    
    Mike
61.873FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 03 1994 21:177
    Wanna see something funny?  try this command:
    
    DIR/AUTHOR=gronowski 61.*
    
    There's a *HUGE* gap from October '93 to September '94!
    
    Mike ;-)
61.874PTOS02::JACOBRBack among the livingTue Oct 04 1994 12:4017
    
>>    too bad jake declined the bet I offered
>>    where the person who's team was lower in the standings each week had
>>    to change their pname.  Jake declined saying he didn't want to tie up
>>    his pname for that long.  What confidence.
  
    Groaner, it's a fixed offer right now.  The 'Spots have a cake schedule
    over the nexted few weeks after the bye, and the STEELERS don't play
    them for a while.
    
    If the offer for this wager was made when the clubs were tied in the
    standings, I'd take it, but the 'Spots are 1 up right now, so it ain't
    an even bet.
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.875SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Tue Oct 04 1994 13:5516
    
    	So after 9/10 week's of the season the 'Spot fans will still be
    saying, "Who have we played?" The 'Spots won't get rid of the critics
    until they make the playoffs and win a playoff game. The Browns
    schedule is luck of the draw. With Denver/Houston and others having
    down years so far.
    	The Patriots will end up with a pretty tough schedule, in terms of
    the other teams W/L record. Miami/Buffalo (Twice), Detroit, Green Bay,
    Chicago, Minnesota, San Diego, and Seattle. The Raiders can always be
    touch also. The current Patriot team could end up playing ~8 games 
    during the season against playoff teams, with another 2/3 on teams that
    just miss the playoffs.
    	I'll give the Browns credit in saying they are winning the games
    they are suppose to win.
    
    Ron
61.876'Spots sip pond water/ Jake you have to mail me some put downsAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneTue Oct 04 1994 14:5311
    
    
      Joe.....
    
      I for one am a Pats fan and if you think the Pats will loose to the
    'Spots in Foxboro I'm willing to take you up on that.  (Any of you
    Clevscum fans for that matter.)  I will make the bet now, no points 
    either way with the looser having to sport the p'name of the winner
    for a week.  Any takers.
    
    Jerry 
61.877SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOTue Oct 04 1994 15:376
re: .-1

	Think the Spots and Pats are duking it out in the
Pound, not at Foxboro.

	zamboni
61.878ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Oct 04 1994 15:4718
    
>    Joe.....
    
>    I for one am a Pats fan and if you think the Pats will loose to the
>    Browns in Foxboro I'm willing to take you up on that.
    
    I don't, and never said that I did.  It could happen, and I'm not
    convinced it won't, but it's not something I'm going to bet the
    farm on.
    
>    (Any of you Cleveland fans for that matter.)  I will make the bet 
>    now, no points either way with the looser having to sport the 
>    p'name of the winner for a week.  Any takers.
    
    Not here, no.  If it were in Cleveland, sure.  But the risk/reward
    ratio for a straight up bet is too great...
    
    Joe
61.879METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 04 1994 16:145
wimp 1 checked in. I have little doubt that Hal and Groaner will be 
wimps 2 and 3.

The Crazy Met

61.880ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 04 1994 16:275
61.881METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 04 1994 16:356
yup and saw someone who does not wimp out on reasonable bets. When
do the two teams play, can't imagine there will be a large spread, if
any at all.

The Crazy Met

61.882ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 04 1994 16:373
61.883CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Oct 04 1994 16:415
As long as you put the tag line in here of "for amusement purposes only"
it's cool in SPROTS(tm).....


'Saw
61.884ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 04 1994 16:423
61.885CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Oct 04 1994 16:4719
>    
>    Gee, I must have missed that when scanning over the P&P manual.
>    

Whoopee.

You've never bitched about it before, and it's gone on in here for a long
time....  P-name bets are a part of sports.  

As far as I'm concerned if you're not wagering money, then it's not 
gambling.


Take the bet or not, it makes no difference to me......


'Saw


61.886ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Oct 04 1994 16:497
    
    Re .881
    
    Why should I bet on something I don't think is going to happen?
    If I thought the Browns were going to win, I'd do it...
    
    Joe
61.887I can't loseSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Oct 04 1994 16:516
    
    	I'll take that bet.......The DAWGS will eat the Patsies up and
    spit them out then walk all over them.  No points.  Such a deal.
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.888ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 04 1994 16:5622
61.889This will be goodAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneTue Oct 04 1994 17:158
    
    
     Hal...
    
      Well that is one taker.  Only stipulation is that you show up in here
    at least once a day Hal...Ya man enough?
    
    Jerry
61.890SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Oct 04 1994 17:249
Uhh, Jerry, did you read the second stipulation of the bet?

While I agree that a New England victory over the Browns is
probably about even money right now, if you are sure that the 
Pats will end up with a better record than Cleveland you are
likely looking at things through red-blue-and-silver shaded 
glasses.

=Bob=
61.891What the hell, count me in too...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 04 1994 17:3620
> While I agree that a New England victory over the Browns is
> probably about even money right now, if you are sure that the 
> Pats will end up with a better record than Cleveland you are
> likely looking at things through red-blue-and-silver shaded 
> glasses.
    
    I don't know about that (I'm assuming a tie is a push).  The Pats 
    have come through the relatively tough 5-game stretch in decent shape, 
    and have 4 games remaining with the mighty Jesters and Dolts.  They're
    in a better position than I thought they'd be, even before the season
    started and certainly after the first two games.
    
    On the other hand, maybe I'm underrating the Browns, as I haven't seen 
    them at all this year, but I still think numbers like a >75% chance to 
    make the playoffs are premature (then again, it doesn't take much to 
    gain the last wildcard, I guess).
    
    glenn
     
61.892HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 04 1994 17:467
  With 14 teams in a conference and 6 making the playoffs, a team has to be
pretty creative to have a winning record and not get at least a wild card.

  I guess it can be done but it seems so tricky that there should be some
sort of prize for pulling it off.

  George
61.893METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 04 1994 17:506
re: .890

The 2 parter was by Groaner, HAL took the original, manly p_name bet.

The Crazy Met

61.894The more I look at that schedule the more I like it...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 04 1994 17:5312
    
> With 14 teams in a conference and 6 making the playoffs, a team has to be
> pretty creative to have a winning record and not get at least a wild card.
    
    Yeah, but I see the Browns being really up against it in the Philly,
    KC, NYG, Dallas, and Pittsburgh (in Pittsburgh) games, give or take 
    a game (let's say they'll win one of those), so I think they'll have 
    to win 4 of 6 from Houston (2), Cinci, Denver, New England, and Seattle
    just to get to 9-7.  That's not close to a lock.
    
    glenn
    
61.895the shock, the horrorMETSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 04 1994 17:564
Glenn are you implying that you disagree with .867??

The Crazy Met

61.896go broncosBSS::MARLANDTue Oct 04 1994 20:051
    Hey, Cleveland fans, you will NOT beat the Broncos this year.
61.897No mention of better record at allAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneWed Oct 05 1994 11:3912
    
    
    
      re  Note 61.890 by SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH "Hakuna Matata - means no worries..." >>>
    
    
     I never said anything about the Pats ending up w/ a better record than
    the 'Spots.  We don't have the luxary of playing Cinci and Houston
    twice each.  All I ever said was I was willing to make a pname bet now
    staight up that the Pats would win.
    
    Jerry
61.898ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 05 1994 16:064
61.899It's almost one and the same... I'm in...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 05 1994 17:3812
>    Two way street, you make one bet offer I make the other... take both
>    or neither... its up to you.
    
    I'm in... all things being equal I'd actually be more concerned with
    the head-to-head game, because it's in Cleveland, but because the game
    represents a 2-game swing in the overall record it'll probably 
    determine the second part too.  But what the hell, it's a fair 
    proposition, for anyone with the cajones...
    
    glenn
    
61.900METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Oct 05 1994 17:526
yabbut Glenn I would make sure that part of the understanding is that Groaner
has to note at least once a day during that week. He has the same kind of track 
record as Hal does for disappearing when things get rough.

The Crazy Met

61.901There in the Drives seat and should be able to handle itMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Oct 05 1994 17:5819
    There biggest problem may be getting by houston in week 6, this team
    is banged up and who know what Houston team will show up after the bye
    week, its a Thursday night game at Houston.  Will be intresting,
    Houston's backs are up against the wall (1-4) and a loss to cleveland
    at home will pretty much knock them out of it..
    
    The WR's in Houston just didnt look good money night, not that the QB's
    had any time to pass (Of could hit the side of a barn) but they looked
    off, also what happened to Houston's defense, they were terrible as
    well.
    
    Cleveland should go 3-1 the next 4 games (Hoping the Pats pull off the
    win) THERE REAL season will start at this point, if there at 7-2 they
    have a shot at the division/playoffs if there at 6-3 they could be in
    some trouble.  There last 7 games WILL ALL HAVE PLAYOFF IMPLICATIONS.
    
    Good Luck Brownies, I really didnt expect Houston to drop to 1-4..
    
    								mab
61.902FXTROT::ALLEMANGWed Oct 05 1994 18:337

Searched all MB's notes for 'their'... came up empty.    



;)   Greg
61.903No time to bandwagon jumpersMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Oct 05 1994 18:4810
    -1, who are you.. Talk about a bandwagon jumper, there enough sports
    noters on the RAG MAB"s notesfile that I dont need a bandwagon jumper.
    
    There/Their has been documented, your too late, its a fact, its known
    you missed the bus, sorry.
    
    Cam(Way) and JD are the 2 best at raggin me and the rest are just
    bandwagon wannabee's so stand in line behind them :-)
    
    								mab
61.904HANNAH::ASHEI feeel so good...Wed Oct 05 1994 18:522
    Can I ask about your FFL_A team?  (smiley goes here)
    
61.905MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Oct 05 1994 18:566
    
      M_AIr may be the worst offender of the their/there/they're
     rule but he does know his sports and he's obviously a big
     sports fan. I'd hope that counts for as much as grammar. I'd
     rather read some of his hacking than some of the gushing
     purple prose that used to stain this conference.
61.906SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Oct 05 1994 19:125
|    Cam(Way) and JD are the 2 best at raggin me and the rest are just
|    bandwagon wannabee's so stand in line behind them :-)
 
Hey I resent that.  I've been raggin' on your grammer as long as those
guys.   
61.907Its funny I can name every starting TE since Joining FFL leaguesMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Oct 05 1994 19:1613
    -1, thank you, -2, Ya Walt Kick a man when he's down, MY FFL_A teams
    (The BullDozers) is in 8th spot, yup thats last and theyve only scored
    120pts (DISGUSTING), funny thing is Im in 2 leagues, I though this team
    would kick but and my other team would be ok, Im in last in this league
    in scoring and in the standings, In my other league im second in
    scoring with 256pts and 2nd in the standings...
    
    Who would have Thunk that me wasting early picks on Ricky Watters,
    Reggie Brooks and Ron Moore would have all been flops... I should have
    grabbed Warren/Butts/Meggett :-)
    
    Celler Dweller in FFL_A (Hey I Climbed out for 1 week)..
    								Dozers
61.908MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Oct 05 1994 19:172
    Woops someone snuck in (WHO IS THAT GUY) Last note should be -2, and -3
    :-)
61.909ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 05 1994 19:227
61.910METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Oct 05 1994 19:237
> They play Houston on a thursday after a week off.

speaking of which anyone hear from Doc lately??

The Crazy Met

61.911btw tb - left a spot fer ya in pool_9425022::BREENWed Oct 05 1994 19:275
    tommy,
    	ya left out the poetry in casey atthebat iambic and the fractured xmas
    carols.
    
    doggerel bill
61.912HANNAH::ASHEI feeel so good...Wed Oct 05 1994 19:286
    Mail was sent by a couple of people yesterday.  No response that I
    know of.  I called him Monday after it was 20-0.  He mumbled something
    about running Buddy and Moon out of town and this was what they got.
    Something else about the Vikes, it was in between too many "ooh, that
    was a good hit" and "nice fumble Bucky you (expletive deleted)'s"
    
61.913METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Oct 05 1994 19:435
good to know Doc hasn't changed. lessee if the current denizens of this
topic will/will not change.

The Crazy Met

61.914ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 07 1994 14:5033
61.915HANNAH::ASHEI feeel so good...Fri Oct 07 1994 15:472
    ... and even or hold your peace... (or is it piece?)
    
61.916FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Oct 07 1994 15:481
    none of that now, this is a family conference!
61.917Shoulda just put me downAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneFri Oct 07 1994 15:523
    
    
      Paul I'm there.
61.918Cain't support the PatsSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Oct 07 1994 16:077
The Dawgs Sip,

	But I ain't no Patsie rooter.

	Let's talk when they play the Broncs.  

	zamboni
61.919ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 07 1994 16:494
61.920SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Oct 07 1994 16:538
>    Sweeney from mass, a donks fan... can you say bandwagon jumper!

Nope,

	cross country mover.  I grew up in Boulder and Longmont Colorado.
I pass orange water!

	t
61.921HANNAH::ASHEOnce, there was this boy who, went to SingaporeFri Oct 07 1994 16:542
    I bet that's from steroid use though...
    
61.922FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Oct 07 1994 17:442
    I think the choice of pnames limits the creative juices flowing in this
    tavern.
61.923PTOS02::JACOBRBack among the livingFri Oct 07 1994 18:445
    My favorite teams are the STEELERS and any team that plays the
    Brownscum from Cleveturd.
    
    JaKe
    
61.924ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Oct 09 1994 21:446
61.926ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 10 1994 11:498
61.927HANNAH::ASHEOnce, there was this boy who, went to SingaporeMon Oct 10 1994 13:026
    Is she even a fan?  She's never entered a note in the Pats topic
    besides making fun of Marky...
    
    Watch it, that could be a slanderous accusation (smiley goes here).
    
    
61.928ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 11 1994 14:3714
61.929FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Oct 11 1994 16:474
    Re: Houston 
    
    When will Cleveland play an NFL team this season?  They only played 1
    (Pittsburgh) so far and now they're too skeert to play another.
61.930Pats 8-8, Cle 9-7, doesnt make them a better team :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Oct 11 1994 18:0518
    Well Cleveland and The Pats both have the same rated schedule (IN terms
    of winning percentage from last year) but face it the Pats play in the
    AFC East which means buffalo and Miami twice, and Indy with Faulk.
    
    Cleveland plays the Begaloos twice and the Moonless Oilers Id say its
    pretty obvious who will end up with the better record.  Cleveland will
    win 1 more game then the pats and becuase they play in the central they
    have a slight better chance then the pats at making the playoffs.  A P
    name bet means nothing to me, I think the pats will beat Cleveland and
    Cleveland will end up with 1 more win which will put them into the
    playoffs and leave the pats at home. (pats finish 8-8, Cle 9-7).
    
    This 15part plan sounds like a politicians way of being a weasle, ok
    if cleveland beats the pats by 12 pts and has 2more win then New
    England and has more guys on the team with birthdays in the month of
    November I'll run Naked thru the mill :-)
    
    								mab
61.931ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 11 1994 23:284
61.932FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Oct 12 1994 15:152
    Being sorry and absent-minded will get you nowhere.  No wonder that EV5
    chip has been on a perpetual release.  
61.933'roids and colorsSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOWed Oct 12 1994 15:1514
re: .921  Waltman

>    I bet that's from steroid use though...
 

	No man, you got it all wrong.  Orange is just natural for Bronco fans.
To get Orange with Blue stripes on game day requires 'roids on Saturday to 
get ones self ready for the game the nexted day.

	Waltman, you obviously still haven't learned the proper way to use
'roids.  It' no wonder your bring your artificial bat to the softball plate 
instead of your natural woody.

	zamboni
61.934just plain surprisedSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Oct 12 1994 15:3234
    
    	It is actually very surprising the Browns have done so well this
    season so far with all the injuries they have sustained.
    
    	Michael Jackson has been bothered with a hamstring problem and 
    has even sat the last two games because of it.
    
    	Mark Carrier has the same injury.
    
    	Patric Rowe is out with a knee injury.
    
    	Walter Reives is now out for the season.
    
    	Tommy Vardell is out for the season.
    
    	But yet they have still found a way to win.  The defense has just
    been plain outstanding this season so far and has had no injuries.  The
    Browns could have ended up with a 1-4 record if the other teams had 
    played up to their abilities.  The Colts have played the Browns hard 
    the last two year and beaten them squarly both times.  I expected alot
    tougher game against them but Oh No.....the Browns squashed them.  The
    Jets also have played well against the Browns and have beaten them the
    last two times they faced.....not pretty....but Oh No....the Browns 
    squashed them.  I expected lots more out of the Arizona team and
    wouldn't have been surprised if the Browns had lost that game but.....
    OH NO....the DAWGS were relentless by spanking them too.  Then, the 
    game they should have won, they gave away to the rust capital of the
    world and sewage pit know as the Squeelers led by the Browns wanabe
    Jake the Fake.  At any rate, the Browns will have their chance on
    National TV to show the US what kind of team they really are.  Look
    for the Browns D to dominate and the offense to make do and score
    35 points and move to 5-1.
    
    	WOOF
61.935HANNAH::ASHEWhat's the frequency, Robert?Wed Oct 12 1994 15:464
    So, being a Lion fan, that's why I pee silver when I drink a lot of
    beer?  I don't do steroids, so I haven't seen the Honolulu Blue
    yet...
    
61.936yuk...FXTROT::ALLEMANGWed Oct 12 1994 18:075
I would guess that first thing in the morning we're all Packer fans then...!


;)
61.93711-8 ugly winSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Oct 14 1994 13:4427
    
    	Surprised that there isn't much being said about the game last
    night.
    
    	It wasn't a pretty game by all means but, the Browns did win and
    the Dawg D did the job.  Mark Carrier played a great game, should have
    seen some of the moves he put on that Lewis fellow.  Now if Vinnie
    could only throw the ball.  There were three long pass to Mark and he
    got himself wide open.  Two were short, one was long and the other was
    behind him.  One was intercepted.  Vinnie looked terrible!  There were
    some good drives with no points but all in all, a win is a win.  The
    Browns D had chances to INT several balls but only came away with one.
    Langham had 3 of the chances, I think he was just surprised that the 
    ball seemed like it was thrown just to him.  Great punting job by Mr.
    Tupa!  Tupa also got his 3rd 2pt conversion or was it his 4th.  Lots
    of pentalties in the game.  
    
    	Way to go DAWGS!
    
    	On to Cincy next week....
    
    	4 in a row and a record of 5-1.  1st in the AFC Central!  
    
    	The way it ought to be!  The way it will be!  The way it is!
    
    
    	WOOF
61.938The box score looked painfully boring...FXTROT::ALLEMANGFri Oct 14 1994 13:512
How close was Del Greco's missed field goal in the 4th? 
61.939EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Oct 14 1994 13:5310
                                                          
    I have renewed confidence that the Browns are a candidate to drop 4 or
    5 in a row, 4 out of 5, something like that, when they hit the tough
    part of their schedule.   Testaverde is still Testaverde.  You can't
    just paint him brown and think he's going to be better.  That
    color-blindness problem around the opposing team's uniforms that
    haunted him in Tampa Bay still appears to be present...
    
    glenn
    
61.94057042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleFri Oct 14 1994 14:264
Del Greco FG = OT crapshoot

The Crazy Met

61.941Things could have been differentSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Oct 14 1994 14:485
    
    	very close miss.  If the football was twice as big, it would have
    hit the post an went in......
    
    	WOOF
61.942No argument from me.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Oct 14 1994 14:537
    
    	I also agree about Vinny.  Didn't like it when he took over and 
    	don't have a whole lot of confidence that he is the man for the 
    	Browns.  I say give Tupa a chance.  I like him!
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.943Good DHBAHBA::HAASaustralopithecus westvirginiusFri Oct 14 1994 14:5715
Is it just me or does Vinny act like a sissy?

I mean, evertime he has pressure, he looks like he's just happy to unload
the ball anywhere down field. I doubt he gets to see many of his
receptions because he's too busy running for cover.

The firsted interception by Lewis looked like it surprised him as much as
anyone else. He was one-on-one with Carrier and it sorta hit him in the
arm and stuck.

I will say this about that: the Cleveland D looks like they can play with
almost anyone. I kept wondering, though, what they'd look like defending
Emmett Smith and the Cowboys.

TTom
61.944SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Oct 14 1994 15:0810
    
    	The one INT against Carrier looked to me like it could have been
    called interferance.
    
    	E. Smith.....probibly like it looked when the Browns played against
    Faulk and Foster.  they'll get a short TD but total yardage will be
    low.  We'll see later in the season.  Anyone have the game stats?
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.945SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Oct 14 1994 15:1112
    
    	Also, it should be noted that how can the Oilers D be rated #1
    against the pass.  There were just too many open receivers last night
    that there is no way I'd say they should be rated #1.  They did however
    stop the rush of the Browns but that was to be expected with the 
    injuries the Browns have.
    
    	Byner is going to have to step up.  Kitchen the TE should be let
    go.  What a bumbler.
    
    	WOOF
    
61.946Don't get too pumped Hal..SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Oct 14 1994 15:249
The Browns are having a good but not ok season so far.

They looked mediocre against Houston last night, one of the weaker teams 
in the league.  Yeah, I know, the Dawgs be 5-1 this season.  But their
opponents are 7-21 combined.  Let's see how the Dawgs do against some 
tough teams.  When they play the 'Boys in December, that will be a true test
for the Dawgs.

zamboni
61.947ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Fri Oct 14 1994 15:2517
    
>    I have renewed confidence that the Browns are a candidate to drop 4 or
>    5 in a row, 4 out of 5, something like that, when they hit the tough
>    part of their schedule.
    
    4 of 5 looks about right.  Two things can be said for the Browns, 
    though - they've beat the teams they should, and other than at QB
    they've got a good team.  Sure, there's room for improvement - but
    other than at QB there's no glaring hole.
    
>    Testaverde is still Testaverde.  You can't
>    just paint him brown and think he's going to be better.
    
    Precisely.  Add a great QB, and the team is a serious Super Bowl
    contender.
    
    Joe
61.948Just call me RCASOSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Oct 14 1994 15:5211
reL -.2 

>The Browns are having a good but not ok season so far.

shoulda read

The Browns are having an ok but not good season so far.

Teach me to type and stuff beef stew down my throat at the same time.

zamboni
61.949Congrats good win vs A division Rival...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 14 1994 16:2924
    7-21 but there wins are vs 4-18 (I think ?)... Good win, any win in
    the division is a good win and with Cinncy coming up you can start
    typing Browns are 6-1 :-) and there next 2 games after that are not
    powerhouse's :-) (Denver, 7-1) then (pats, hopefully a pats win).
    
    They still have to prove they can beat (and are a better team) then 
    pittsburg, if the browns are lucky the 2nd game vs Pittsburg wont
    mean anything (They better hope theyve clinched the division by then).
    
    Every team has games THAT THEY SHOULD WIN and Cleveland has done that
    they have a GRUELING stretch coming up and they may make all of us
    Vinny Beleivers :-)
    
    But Id like to remind some certain Cleveland fans to be carefull, you
    fans have to be the worst JINKS's in the world of sports.  Being A
    bulls ran I can remember many a times cleveland fans ranting and raven
    about what there cavs were going to do to the bulls and then making up
    excuse's (100% of the time).... They have the best team in the AFC
    central (Clearly the weakest division in football) but outside of that
    they havnt proved anything (YET)... PHI/KC/HOU/NYG/DAL/PIT/SEA will all
    be tough games and losing 6 of 7 could happen... I wouldnt buy any SB
    tickets just yet :-)
    
    								mab
61.950ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Oct 16 1994 19:226
61.951Cleveland may have just got a HUGE break in PittsburgMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Oct 19 1994 14:0216
    The best thing that could have happened to clevlend happened this
    weekend.  Pittsburg (the only team to beat cleveland so far) just
    lost foster for 3 weeks in which Pittsburg has NYG, ARZ and Houston
    those could be very scaries game's for Pittsburg without foster, and
    they could lose them all.  ANd then when foster gets back Pittsburg
    has Buffalo, Miami, Raiders (Plus Philly and SD) thats no cake walk
    schedule giving cleveland could win there next 3 games.  
    
    This will make things very intresting, Dont want to downgrade Cleveland
    but I do feel that the WC teams in the East/West divisions (KC/BUF) are
    better teams then Cleveland so whoever the 3rd WC team is will have the
    best matchup (IF cleveland holds onto the central).
    
    Still Hopeing the pats can take out Miami and then Cleveland :-)
    
    								mab
61.952SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Oct 19 1994 15:2017
    
    	They don't play buddy ball in Cleveland.......they play Billy Ball.
    
    	I'd also love to see the Patsies play Cleveland in the playoffs...
    
    		Moven on up.........
    
    	Just read an artical about Jim Brown going to Clevelands practice
    	yesterday instead of the usual Friday and Saturday because he wants
    	to make sure the DAWGS don't take the Bangles lightly this weekend.
    
    	Good idea!
    
    		Go Browns!
    
    		WOOF!
    
61.953CAMONE::WAYCharge men, for God's sake, Charge!Wed Oct 19 1994 16:1012
>    
>    	Just read an artical about Jim Brown going to Clevelands practice
>    	yesterday instead of the usual Friday and Saturday because he wants
>    	to make sure the DAWGS don't take the Bangles lightly this weekend.
>    

WOW!

I guess since his movie career hit the skids he's got too much free
time on his hands......
    

61.954ELMAGO::BENBACAAtDEC18Years.ItAllEndsNovember18th.Wed Oct 19 1994 17:501
     He's gonna try out. Says he can still play with and against any team.
61.955PTOS02::JACOBRIt's nobody's fault but mine....Mon Oct 24 1994 02:145
    Combined records of the teams that the Brown(spot)s(tm) have beat is
    now 10-31.  Tough schedule, eh???
    
    JaKe
    
61.956ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 24 1994 10:118
61.957MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Mon Oct 24 1994 15:069
    
   >> Sour grapes from JaKe would obviously bowled poorly lasted night. 
    
    Anyone who remembered their decoder ring this morning care to take 
    a stab at this one???
    
    
    
    billl
61.958HANNAH::ASHEtil the sun comes up over Santa Monica BlvdMon Oct 24 1994 15:382
    boweled maybe?  not sure?
    
61.959Cleveland could = NYGMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Oct 26 1994 18:2213
    Cleveland is #2 in the afc.  CLeveland and SD are both 6-1, they 
    havnt played head to head there both 5-1 in the afc, if division
    records are used, SD wins.  IF common opponents are used in any
    way its a tie, but in pts scored (total or vs common opp's are used)
    sd wins... In no tie break does Cleveland get the nod over sd so they
    are #2 in the AFC right now... :-)
    
    Next too weeks are huge if cleveland is to have a succesful season they
    may need the next 2 weeks as wins...Will be intresting to see if
    cleveland is the NYG of the AFC, can only win the easy games and pad
    there record then lose to anyone who resembles a team..
    
    								mab
61.960PTOS02::JACOBRLocked out of the gene poolWed Oct 26 1994 19:3516
    
    
    Just talked to --dan'l, and he wanted me to pass on a message for him
    concerning the Brown(spot)s(tm) and their fast approaching midnight in
    thier cinderella season.
    
    JaKe
    
****************************************************************************
    
HALpocricy coming soon to a note near you November 13th, look for sneak
previews in the coming weeks.

--dan'l


61.961go broncosBSS::MARLANDThu Oct 27 1994 13:112
    the browns game with the broncos will not be easy, matter of fact
    I think they'll lose.
61.962Good Luck Browns, your luck may be running out..MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Oct 27 1994 13:1814
    The Browns will be in trouble if they lose to denver, seeing that there
    going to lose to the pats the following week.  They could easily lose 5
    of there last 7 which would put them at 8-8 and out of the playoffs.
    
    It will be intresting they Play New England, Kansas City and Seattle 
    all of which have a shot at wildcard contenders so all of these games
    could have playoff implications (I know 90% of the games do).
    
    Seattle has a shot at a .500 season, as well has NE so both of them
    with one break there way could hit the magic 9 wins mark.. Will be
    intresting to see if pittsburg can keep pace with Cleveland over the
    next 3 weeks...
    
    								mab
61.963ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Oct 27 1994 13:5916
    
    I think this year's Browns will prove to be an excellent study of
    the importance of special teams...
    
    Offensively and defensively, the Browns are OK, with the only thing
    that really differentiates the team being their ability to make
    big plays.
    
    But the special teams have been great, the sole exception being
    Stover (who's been OK).
    
    I think the Browns will win the next two, which should be enough to
    put them in the playoff (assuming they can win at least one of the
    last seven games, which I'm sure they can).
    
    Joe
61.964SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Oct 27 1994 20:284
    
    Need I remind everyone what ole Art said......?
    
    WOOF
61.965How can you not mention the DAWG DSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Oct 27 1994 20:306
    
    	Read .0 if you don't remember.  It will come true!
    
    	WOOF WOOF
    
    
61.966He'd have put it in writing 'cept Dawg Pound cain't readEDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 27 1994 20:469
>    	Read .0 if you don't remember.  It will come true!
    
    That was last year.  The Browns didn't make the playoffs; Art didn't
    move out of town.  With any luck he'll continue break his promises
    with the other stuff...
    
    glenn
    
61.968PTOS02::JACOBRSave a sheep, neuter a W.Virginian!!Thu Oct 27 1994 20:569
    
    glenn, if ya look, the HALquote of 'ol Farty Art says within 3 years.
    
    this will be the second year that they don't win the division title.
    
    JaKe
    

    
61.969ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 28 1994 13:328
61.97057042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleFri Oct 28 1994 14:107
> I fully expect to take serious crap if the Donks win.
    
you got that right!

The Crazy Met

61.971Denver wins in OT?OLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindFri Oct 28 1994 14:4313
    
    
     When you consider the Browns have played against teams with a combined
    15/35 .300 record and Broncos 31/18 .632, this may turn out to be a close 
    game. Denver has the 5th AFC offense and 14th Defense. The Browns have
    the 10th Offense and the 4th Defense.   Elways the 5th afc Qb with 3
    receivers in the top 20 for receptions and Vinnie is 13th with no one in 
    the top 20.  The rush offesne is a draw ( 3 yards ave diff) with the Browns
    10th and Denver 11th in the AFC.  
    
      It looks like Altitude or  Attitude will decide this one.
    
      
61.972ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 28 1994 15:0920
61.973ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 28 1994 15:096
61.97457042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleFri Oct 28 1994 15:238
> but if the browns win...  there will be lots of bragging!
    

yeah well that will be a real surprise!

The Crazy Met

61.975Yeah but...SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Oct 28 1994 15:599
Groaner was looking for anybody to do a pname bet with when the Dawgs
were playing the Patsies.  Now that the 'Spots are playing their old Nemesis
this weekend, it appears Groaner doesn't have the guts to make the bet!

No surprise there I guess.

Any other real men Brownie fans got enough cajones to make a pname bet?

zamboni
61.976MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Fri Oct 28 1994 16:018
    >> tcm, i will take my beating on monday for the regulars, not the
    >> fly-by-night noters...
    
    	You will TAKE it and you will LIKE it!
    
    
    
    	billl
61.977GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsFri Oct 28 1994 16:196
    
    	I'll make a p-name wager with Ice.  As long as it's a mainly
    	bet.....NO POINTS!  Straight up.  Something Slasher would know
    	nothing about........
    
    Claybone
61.978You're on ClayboneSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Oct 28 1994 17:568
A manly bet.  No points, straight up.  The loser has to enter in at least one 
note a day next week with the pname "The Browns/Broncos are the BEST team in the
NFL!"  Broncos/Browns, of course, is whichever is the winning team.

Any other non-wussy Browns lovers?  I love how they all run for cover when
they're team hops on their choker charter to Mile-high!

zamboni
61.979ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Fri Oct 28 1994 18:196
    
    I'll take the bet, provided I can choose something a bit more poetic
    than "The Browns are the BEST team in the NFL!" as the loser's
    pname when the Browns win...
    
    Joe
61.980GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsFri Oct 28 1994 18:295
    
    	I think you got me pegged wrong there zamboni.  I'm a Donk fan
    	and I was challenging Iceman (aka Groaner).  
    
    Claybone
61.981Browns win Division...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 28 1994 18:4819
    Good example with the 65-55 55-65 but this is not quite that even.
    
    Face it the browns have played 1 good team regardless of there 
    records, the Steelers and I wont remind you of the outcome.  Now
    they Play denver a good team with a bad record.  The other teams they
    beat (Cinncy, Arz, ind, NYJ, Hou, Cin) are not power houses.  Although
    I will say the Arizona and houston were good wins, many people felt
    these 2 teams would be doing alot better (Arz may have a better record
    if buddy didnt play QB swap games and Hou has had a slew of Injuries).
    
    But theyve had a VERY EASY SCHEDULE and theyve taken advantage of it.
    BUT a few of them came on special teams and defense, in other words the
    other team made 2 many mistakes.  Come closer to playoff time the GOOD
    teams won make as many mistakes...
    
    My prediction is Browns finish 10-6, Pittsburg 9-7....but Good luck in
    the playoffs depending on Tie Breakers you could have to play KC, SD,
    MIA or BUF the first week....
    								mab
61.98257045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleFri Oct 28 1994 19:334
    sigh I'm away Sunday-Tuesday and will miss out on the fun :-(
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.983ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 28 1994 22:274
61.984ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 28 1994 22:309
61.985ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsMon Oct 31 1994 00:094
61.986ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Mon Oct 31 1994 12:037
    
    You know you're in trouble when...
    
    Vinny Testaverde talks about retiring, and you're worried that it
    will lower your team's talent at QB.
    
    Joe
61.987The Iceman is a real manSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOMon Oct 31 1994 12:406
A salute to you Ice,

	Didn't get a chance to read this over the weekend.  Nice to see you
living up to the p-name bet none the less.

	zamboni
61.988GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsMon Oct 31 1994 12:507
    
    Ice,
    
    	Being the magnanimous fella I am, the p-name zamboni branded
    	you with will suffice to cover our wager.  It looks good on you.
    
    Claybone
61.989FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 31 1994 13:371
    Have the Dawgs ever won at Pile-it High(tm) Stadium?
61.990go broncosBSS::MARLANDMon Oct 31 1994 17:112
    to all you cleveland assholes who thought you would beat my broncos, 
    ha ha ha. You won't f*ck with my team again.
61.991GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsMon Oct 31 1994 17:142
    
    	Sheez.....
61.993ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsMon Oct 31 1994 17:206
61.99424661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Oct 31 1994 17:313
    RE .990: Who left the outhouse door open?
    
    Mark.
61.995Cmon Groaner #22 burned this teamOURGNG::RIGGENNetworks Sales &amp; MarketingMon Oct 31 1994 17:318
How about a Game analysis ?

Offensively the Browns didn't run block at all. Look at the facts folks Denver
has no defense. 
Defense was called for a totally BOGUS interference. 
Eric Metcalf looked in the mirror and saw Glynn Milburn. 

Jeff 
61.996FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 31 1994 17:351
    So that's what happens when you take this stuff so seriously!
61.997CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeMon Oct 31 1994 17:389
Yeah, nice mouth.  

If I wasn't under the weather today, I'd set it hidden.....


Iceman, is that the cool kind of paste that kids used to eat in Kindergarten?


'Saw
61.998ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Mon Oct 31 1994 17:429
    
    You know, this p-name is starting to grow on me.
    
    It's so ridiculous - given the performance of the Broncos this
    season - that it's kinda funny.
    
    I think I'll keep it.  B^}
    
    Joe
61.999FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 31 1994 17:482
    I think Joe is actually a closet Donk fan!  Congrats to the Coloradans
    on their new convert.
61.1000Clevescum SnarfFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 31 1994 17:481
    
61.1001ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsMon Oct 31 1994 17:484
61.1002FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 31 1994 17:491
    I always thought DAWG fans were on glue.
61.1003ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsMon Oct 31 1994 17:503
61.1004ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Mon Oct 31 1994 17:5414
    
>    I think Joe is actually a closet Donk fan!  Congrats to the Coloradans
>    on their new convert.
    
    Yup, of course.
    
    Elway is Dog!  Um, er, God!
    
    Glynn Milburn is the second coming of Jim Brown!  Er, wait, scratch
    that... of Walter Payton!
    
    How'm I doin'?
    
    Joe
61.1006Could we have a ruling, please? ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 31 1994 17:5513
>    You know, this p-name is starting to grow on me.
>
>    It's so ridiculous - given the performance of the Broncos this
>    season - that it's kinda funny.
    
    Whoa, now, implied p-name sarcasm is _not_ permitted-- either that, or
    I'm going to have a real hard time keeping a straight face with that 
    "Browns have an awesome squad" garbage that it looks like I'll be 
    wearing next week...
    
    glenn
    
61.1007ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Mon Oct 31 1994 17:579
    
    Glenn,
    
    I didn't write it (or the Browns message, for that matter).
    
    I'll avoid pointing out any inconsistencies in my p-name for
    the rest of the week.
    
    Joe
61.1008CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeMon Oct 31 1994 18:215
Rubber Cement is COOL.

I always liked the kind with the applicator tip that you had to slit open...

I miss those big fat red pencils too....
61.1009ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsMon Oct 31 1994 18:405
61.1010HAL watch day 357045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Nov 03 1994 00:426
    ICE, nice p_name; good to see 'ya not disappear.
    
    But where is HAL???
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1011ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsThu Nov 03 1994 01:486
61.1012Big game for the DAWGSSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Nov 03 1994 10:2818
    
    	What, I didn't know I was missing.....at any rate.....I didn't see
    the game last weekend but did hear that our rookie secondary man,
    Antonio missplayed two balls last week.....one witch set up the game
    winning TD when Russell caught a 5 yard pass and turned it into a 
    45 yard gain because Antonio missed.
    
    	I can give him one game but lets not make it two.
    
    	The Browns will come back this week in the Pound and beat up on
    the hopeless Pats.  Now that ole Vinnie is out, look for more
    supporters to jump on the bandwagon.  Suposibly, Vinnie is
    contemplating retirement now that he's been hit in the head a few
    times.  Lets see what Mark can do!
    
    	Go DAWGS!
    
    		WOOF! WOOF!
61.1013ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsFri Nov 04 1994 12:2535
61.1015ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsFri Nov 04 1994 13:065
61.1017ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsFri Nov 04 1994 15:0336
61.1019ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsFri Nov 04 1994 17:213
61.1020PTOS02::JACOBRSAVE THE WORLD, NUKE OHIO!!!Fri Nov 04 1994 18:584
    wouldn't be the first time one went over yer haid, Groaner.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1021ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsSun Nov 06 1994 15:486
61.1022ROCK::GRONOWSKIawaiting final outcome of Dawgs-Pats gameSun Nov 06 1994 15:493
61.1023PTOS02::JACOBRPolitically incorrect &amp; damn proud of itSun Nov 06 1994 19:537
    
    >>    Its going to be wet and wild in Cleveland.
    
    What, has Bernice returned and gotten excited????
    
    JaKe
    
61.1024ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULES, Pats SIP!Sun Nov 06 1994 23:334
61.1025ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sun Nov 06 1994 23:333
61.1026The pass interference call on Hurst was a jokeAD::HEATHDawgs rule Pats sipMon Nov 07 1994 10:2520
    
    
    
         What a joke of a game.  The Patriettes are going backwards fast.
    Finishing at 500 this year is totally out of the question and if they
    don't win another game I would not be surprised.  Play calling still
    continues to be a question.  They started to run the ball early and 
    just kept going to the same play.  Eventually the defense will find a
    way to stop the Butts over Kratch/Armstrong play.  Bledsoe seems to be
    a little gun shy the last couple of games.  I know I wouldn't want 300
    plus lineman hitting me for 3 hours but sometimes you have to step up.
    He hasn't in about a month.  Coates has been taken out of the game for
    about the same time so maybe we are seeing how good Bledsoe really is,
    take away his best receiver and he becomes a non factor.  
    
         The Browns did not play a very good game but well enough to win
    and I quess that is what counts, but if anyone thinks they are going
    anywhere in the 'offs they're soft as a grape.
    
    Jerry
61.1027ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Mon Nov 07 1994 11:064
61.1028SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Mon Nov 07 1994 11:3215
    
    	I didn't take the P_name bet so I can still say the Brown 'Spots
    sip. Cleveland's defence is very strong, even without Michael Dean
    Perry. They hammered any Pariot who tried to catch a ball over the
    middle. I'm a Giants fan, and I loved Pepper Johnson when he was with
    the Giants. Did he cover Coates like a glove yesterday, great job.
    	Don't know if it was the wind or not. The Browns offence needs some
    work. When Metcalf is a non-factor like he was yesterday. The Browns
    can't do much on offence.
    	I think that penalty on Hurst was a little cheap. It should have
    been a non-call at best, The ball was un-catchable. The Browns
    receiver pushed off against Hurst to get around him. Then Hurst makes
    the classic mistake of retalitation.
    
    Ron
61.1029They wanted it moreAD::HEATHDawgs rule Pats sipMon Nov 07 1994 11:433
    
    
      I won't talk negative just being honest. :*)
61.1030ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Mon Nov 07 1994 12:429
61.1031Settling my part of the Pname bet...TOOK::HALPINThe BROWNS HAVE AN SWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIPMon Nov 07 1994 12:5014
    
    
    	The PNAME doesn't bother me, I already knew the Pats Sip.
    
    	The Browns D played very well. Excellent job of removing
    Coates from the game almost completely. Played the wideouts
    nice and tight, it helps when you know the Pats have no deep
    threat. And put enough pressure on Bledsoe all day long to have him
    constantly making bad throws/decsions....
    
    	Cleveland's offense sucks however...
    
    JimH
    
61.1032EDWIN::WAUGAMANBrowns rule, Pats SIP!Mon Nov 07 1994 13:0316
    
    Naw, Hurst didn't even retaliate.  He had his arm held down only
    slightly and just pulled it away.  It was just a blown call all the 
    way.  Throw in da refs' inability to recognize a fumble (twice) and 
    it's pretty clear that Art Modell and his money had an emotional 
    stake in this p-name bet... ;-)
    
    Seriously, though, it now looks as if at the end of the season we 
    might be saying that the Patriots actually regressed this season, 
    over last.  Maybe it's just perception but it sure seems as if 
    there were more positives last year, with things like the play of the
    O-line and the defense, even through all the losing.  Now we're just
    seeing all-around ineptitude...
    
    glenn
     
61.1033MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 07 1994 14:4713
    
  >> Seriously, though, it now looks as if at the end of the season we 
  >> might be saying that the Patriots actually regressed this season, 
  >> over last.  
    
     And Bledsoe seems to get worse by the game. Very dumb interception
    throwing it into heavy traffic when the Pats were driving. More than
    once he threw while simultaneously ducking a la Tony "The Turtle"
    Eason. Of course, it didn't help that the receiving corps often can't
    get open and when they did they didn't catch some pretty easy balls.
    Still, if it was anybody but Parcells we might have a QB controversy
    on our hansa but Bill is as stubborn as they come.
    
61.1034CAMONE::WAYTake me, subcreature!Mon Nov 07 1994 15:1610
>    Still, if it was anybody but Parcells we might have a QB controversy
>    on our hansa but Bill is as stubborn as they come.

Yabbut, that might pay off in the long run for Bledsoe.   I remember
that's what Parcells did to Simms.

They kind of have to take their lumps.  Bledsoe's breakdowns are probably
more mental from the pressure that's building, I'd bet.....
    

61.1035TOOK::HALPINThe BROWNS HAVE AN SWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIPMon Nov 07 1994 15:2343
    
    
    
    > And Bledsoe seems to get worse by the game. Very dumb interception
    >throwing it into heavy traffic when the Pats were driving. More than
    >once he threw while simultaneously ducking a la Tony "The Turtle"
    >Eason.
    
    	Yup, Bledsoe didn't exactly look like an all-pro QB yesterday, for
    sure. But I think there were a couple of encouraging signs that Drew is
    continue to develop. A couple of weeks ago you were complaining that
    Bledsoe didn't know what to do when the blitz was being shown. Well at
    least yesterday he reacted fequently by changing the play at the line
    of scrimmage. Unfortunately their execution under the pressure stunk.
    
    	One partucular sequence, early in the 3rd, typified their poor play.
    On 2nd and long, the Browns safties come up, Drew audibles and drifts
    back for a screen, but has the pass battered down (The Pats can't run a
    screen play to save their lives, Parcells should review the Browns for
    example of how to do it right!) Then on 3rd down, the corner blitz
    comes from Hawkins side, Bledsoe takes 3 steps and hits Hawkins in the
    hands with a quick pass, incomplete.
    
    	On the other hand, I agree with you 100% about the throwing, while
    ducking comment. The kid had nervous feet yesterday. Think he's getting
    tired of getting nailed?
    
    	If nothing else, this year Bledsoe will learn how to handle the
    Blitz, or die trying.....
    
    > Of course, it didn't help that the receiving corps often can't
    >get open and when they did they didn't catch some pretty easy balls.
    >Still, if it was anybody but Parcells we might have a QB controversy
    >on our hansa but Bill is as stubborn as they come.
    
    	So you think Bledsoe should have been pulled yesterday? Would
    Zolak have done any better? You your self admit the receivers weren't
    exactly great yesterday either.... Just curious...
    
    JimH
    
    
    
61.1036PTOS02::JACOBRPolitically incorrect &amp; damn proud of itMon Nov 07 1994 15:515
    Hey Groaner, on the call on Hurst, the receiver din't get "hit at the
    2", more like he pushed off at the 2.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1037MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 07 1994 15:5332
   >> One partucular sequence, early in the 3rd, typified their poor play.
   >> On 2nd and long, the Browns safties come up, Drew audibles and drifts
   >> back for a screen, but has the pass battered down (The Pats can't run a
   >> screen play to save their lives, Parcells should review the Browns for
   >> example of how to do it right!) 
    
      I'd blame Bledsoe not Parcells for the poor execution on that screen.
      He tipped that play from the beginning. I can't imagine that there
      was anyone not expecting a screen the way he kept back pedaling and
      looking in that direction.
    
   >> On the other hand, I agree with you 100% about the throwing, while
   >> ducking comment. The kid had nervous feet yesterday. Think he's getting
   >> tired of getting nailed?
    
      Tired of getting nailed? I don't think he's getting nailed all that
      much and when he does it's because he hasn't got the good sense to
      get rid of the ball when there's nothing there. He certainly isn't
      taking the kind of punishment that Grogan used to take. 
    
        
   >> So you think Bledsoe should have been pulled yesterday? Would
   >> Zolak have done any better? You your self admit the receivers 
    >> weren't exactly great yesterday either.... Just curious...
    
      I think he's not getting the job done. He was obviously green and
      now he's obviously lost his confidence. And as evidence of how
      he doesn't always use the best judgement (I refrain from saying he's
      dim), I submit the two hail mary passes. Neither of them reached
      the end zone so what's the point, Drew? Why even bother?
    
    
61.1038The worst offense in the NFL right now...EDWIN::WAUGAMANBrowns rule, Pats SIP!Mon Nov 07 1994 15:5920
    I don't know if Bledsoe's getting "dumber" or if in a sense he's
    quitting.  Which is worse is open to debate.  To hear Cris 
    Collinsworth tell it Ben Coates also gave up in the 4th quarter,
    and Michael Timpson was about the only guy out there capable of 
    anything, and it wasn't much.  Whether it's Bledsoe or Zolak  
    (I'd have no problem with a "message" benching at this point) 
    the interceptions are going to continue to pile up, because when 
    you fall behind, a goal of not making mistakes isn't sufficient, 
    yet at the same time there appears to be little offered by 
    the receivers.  So it comes down to a choice of eating the ball 
    often and losing, or trying to force something to happen and losing.  
    The offense just lacks talent far too severely at key skill positions.
    
    Speaking of which, whatever happened to Blair Thomas?  Was he held out 
    by injury or coach's decision or did I just miss him?  Someone capable
    of an occasional outside run wouldn't hurt...
    
    glenn
     
61.1039better days aheadBSS::MARLANDMon Nov 07 1994 15:598
    man, i can't believe all this negative stuff about Drew. He's young, 
    he's gonna make mistakes. Out here in Colorado we've had to put
    up with Elway making stupid mistakes this year and he suppose to
    know better. I haven't seen to many patriot games this year but
    from the ones i've seen i can see why he has nervous feet. I just
    hate to see you patriot fans so hard on him, i think he's gonna be 
    great in the future.
            
61.1040Down 7 with one last play, what did you want to see?EDWIN::WAUGAMANBrowns rule, Pats SIP!Mon Nov 07 1994 16:2313
>      And as evidence of how
>      he doesn't always use the best judgement (I refrain from saying he's
>      dim), I submit the two hail mary passes. Neither of them reached
>      the end zone so what's the point, Drew? Why even bother?
 
    Why would you submit those plays as a question of judgment?  Both were
    obvious Hail Mary situations.  That they didn't get there was a matter
    of execution, possibly affected by the wind but irrelevant in any case.
    
    glenn
     
                                                 
61.1041MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 07 1994 16:5015
    >>  -< Down 7 with one last play, what did you want to see? >-
    
        I wanted to see him loft it into the end zone instead of to a 
        specific receiver five yards short of the end zone. As it was, 
        even if one of the Pats managed to catch the ball, they would 
        have been tackled and the half and later the game would have 
        been over. To me, it just pointed to more poor judgement on 
        Bledsoe's part.
    
        BTW - what Collinsworth said about Voates was that he had either
              given up or he was exhausted. The cameras immediately cut to
              Coates who was gasping for breath between plays.
     
                                                 
    
61.104257045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Nov 07 1994 17:285
    Glenn with a p_name! will wonders never
    cease??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1043ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Mon Nov 07 1994 17:516
    
>    Glenn with a p_name! will wonders never cease??
    
    That's what happens when he bets against Cleveland... B^)
    
    Joe
61.1044CAMONE::WAYTake me, subcreature!Mon Nov 07 1994 18:095
Glenn's a good sport.  Heck, he's even a Cal Ripkin fan (which never stopped
me from liking him)  8^)


'Saw
61.1045You don't see me calling him Gehreg...EDWIN::WAUGAMANBrowns rule, Pats SIP!Mon Nov 07 1994 18:156
    
> Glenn's a good sport.  Heck, he's even a Cal Ripkin fan (which never stopped
> me from liking him)  8^)
    
    That's Ripken, you big dummy... ;-)
    
61.1046MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 07 1994 18:258
    
      >> -< The worst offense in the NFL right now... >-
    
         BTW, this is a bit of an exaggerration as well. Take away
         a few (well, quite a few) painful turnovers and this team
         manages to put some points on the board and at least has
         some offensive weapons. Tampa Bay, on the other hand, 
         couldn't score at the Mustang Ranch.
61.1047TOOK::HALPINThe BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIPMon Nov 07 1994 18:4453
    
    
    
      >I'd blame Bledsoe not Parcells for the poor execution on that screen.
      >He tipped that play from the beginning. I can't imagine that there
      >was anyone not expecting a screen the way he kept back pedaling and
      >looking in that direction.
    
    
    	Didn't mean to imply that Parcells was to blame, definitely crummy
    execution on Drews part. He needed to lob the ball over the oncoming
    rush. The reference to Parcells was because as head coach he's
    responsible for preparing a game plan for next week. He should show the
    Pats some film of the Browns screen pass as an example of how its done
    right....
    
    
     > Tired of getting nailed? I don't think he's getting nailed all that
     > much and when he does it's because he hasn't got the good sense to
     > get rid of the ball when there's nothing there. He certainly isn't
     > taking the kind of punishment that Grogan used to take. 
    
    	He's getting hit a lot after releasing the ball. He may have only
    gotten sacked once yesterday, but he picked himself up off the turf an
    awful lot. His problem is that he is bailing out as he throws, he has
    to learn to finish the pass and not bailing. He going to get hit
    anyway.
    
    
   >>> So you think Bledsoe should have been pulled yesterday? Would
   >>> Zolak have done any better? You your self admit the receivers 
   > >> weren't exactly great yesterday either.... Just curious...
   > 
   >   I think he's not getting the job done. He was obviously green and
   >   now he's obviously lost his confidence. And as evidence of how
   >   he doesn't always use the best judgement (I refrain from saying he's
   >   dim), I submit the two hail mary passes. Neither of them reached
   >   the end zone so what's the point, Drew? Why even bother?
    
    	Jeez Tommy. I thought I asked a pretty direct question, but you
    managed not to answer it any way. I'll try again, slowly this time:
    
    
    
    Do   you    think   Zolak   would    have   done   better?????
    
    
    JimH :-)
    
    
    
    
    
61.1048CNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthMon Nov 07 1994 19:009
    	He's getting hit a lot after releasing the ball. He may have only
    gotten sacked once yesterday, but he picked himself up off the turf an
    awful lot. His problem is that he is bailing out as he throws, he has
    to learn to finish the pass and not bailing. He going to get hit
    anyway.

 in layman's terms he needs a set of filberts.........

 mike
61.1049MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 07 1994 19:0019
    
    >> Jeez Tommy. I thought I asked a pretty direct question, but you
    >> managed not to answer it any way. I'll try again, slowly this time:
        
    >> Do   you    think   Zolak   would    have   done   better?????
    
       Don't patronize me, Jim. Besides, what the hell am I, Kreskin?
       I don't know if Zolak would have done better - no one does. It's
       a question that has no answer. Am I supposed to post Zolak's 
       imaginary stats? I do know that he would have been hard-pressed 
       to do worse than Bledsoe's four interceptions, his 166 yard total
       and besides Zolak has something that Bledsoe doesn't - mobility.
       After watching Bledsoe yesterday, I think his watching the next game
       from the sideline would be best for everyone involved.        
    
    
    
    
    
61.1050Only Tampa is worse than ArizonaFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Nov 07 1994 19:093
    They had the worst offenses listed during the Cards game yesterday. 
    The Pats weren't even in the bottom 5 in total points scored so far. 
    The Pats topped the Cards current level in week 4.
61.1051Po'po Parcells25022::BREENMon Nov 07 1994 19:1912
    All you have to do is watch Ripken play to be a big fan of his.
    
    Pat's need to figure out something they do well and go with it.  I
    don't see slogging it out with Cleveland whose team picture is found
    next to Webster's definition of Slog.
    
    Parcell's is in the state he's in because he sees game after game lost
    because his pride wouldn't let him negotiate with Russell.  He should
    have lost the Packer game too.
    
    I agree with giving Bledsoe a rest except if Zolak does well it'll be
    hard to get Bledso back in there again.
61.1052ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Mon Nov 07 1994 19:3511
    
>    All you have to do is watch Ripken play to be a big fan of his.
    
    Hmmm... hasn't worked for me, for some reason.
    
    Not that I don't appreciate the things he does do (great offense
    early in the season, great defensive positioning), but his single
    minded persuit of the consecutive games record really doesn't do
    anything for me...
    
    Joe
61.1053Yeh, I should get out to the park more often25022::BREENMon Nov 07 1994 19:4211
    Well my cousing finally dragged me to a game last year and he saved the
    night just by the way he plays.  It's just a way of playing that a
    gifted professional acquires over so many years.
    
    And Gehrig should have taken a few games off once in awhile too.  And
    if I were managing the O's and in a race year in year out I would want
    him in there.  If you have that part of the game (infield defense) 50 %
    straight (ss 50;2b 25;3b,1b 10% each by my reckoning) you will win a
    lot of games.
    
    But it is a visual thing more than a stat thing.
61.1054The Real teams are a coming but should win 10MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 07 1994 19:4421
    Well it dont matter how you win, but  between that call on Hearst and
    last week's NOCALL on Herman Moore's Knee Down Id say the REFS ARE
    GETTING WORSE WEEK TO WEEK...
    
    But you cant argue with FACTS and the FACTS are unless Dallas shutouts
    NY Tonight CLevland will have the #1 Defense in the league, I dont care
    about yards passing/rushing etc, who cars.  Cleveland has allowed a
    league low 111pts so far this season... And if Hoard can play against
    anyone other then that pats like he did yesturday then Then now have
    a Running Game... And we all know Parcells would trade places in a 
    heartbeat, Cleveland has a Running Game and the Best Defense...
    
    Cleveland must now prove there a contender.  They have 3 more easy
    games (Hou/NYG/Sea) and those 3 wins will give them 10 on the year
    and will put them in the playoffs.  But no one will give them credit
    if they lose the other 4 games (VS Worthy Opponents).  We all remember
    what happen to the NYG last year when they won a ton of games vs shmuck
    teams, I beleive they got toasted 40something to 3 (Or something Like
    that)...
    
    							mab
61.1055TOOK::HALPINThe BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIPMon Nov 07 1994 20:1731
    
    
    >>> Do   you    think   Zolak   would    have   done   better?????
    >
    >   Don't patronize me, Jim. Besides, what the hell am I, Kreskin?
    >   I don't know if Zolak would have done better - no one does. It's
    >   a question that has no answer. Am I supposed to post Zolak's 
    >   imaginary stats?
    
    
    	Nothing irks me more than throwing a bunch of ascii characters at a
    question, which don't shed any light on an answer.
    
    	I was looking for opinion, nothing more. I was "curious" especially
    with your reference to a "quarterback controversy" and a to
    the receivers not getting open and dropping passes when they did get
    open. I guess I wanted to explore the idea that somehow Zolak might be
    an improvement. (Better mobility for example??)
    
    	But you dodge the question and posted random characters instead.
    Too bad, because I too think the Big Tuna is overly stubborn, and
    should be trying different things to shake up this team.
    
    	Try some different RBs. Scramble that offensive line. Give Zolak
    the ball and Drew a view from the bench. Do SOMETHING Bill, because
    what you got now ain't working...
    
    JimH
    
    
    	
61.1056OLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindMon Nov 07 1994 20:409
    
    
    re 1054
    
    
       It will take so doing for the Cleveland d to catch Dallas. Prior to
    yesterdays ggames the Browns had given up 2628 yards compared to 2104
    for the #2 (GreenBay #1) Dallas defense   Cleveland was ranked 19th
    before yesterday.
61.1057PTOS02::JACOBRCleveland=RECTUM of the World!!Mon Nov 07 1994 23:4211
    They may have the #1 defense as far as "points allowed" goes, but then
    AGAIN, you have to consider who they've played.  When you play teams
    with a combined record that's something like 24 games under .500, so
    far, yer gramdmother could play out there and stop em.
    
    As far as the Refs go, after watching the STEELER game, and much of the
    'Spots-Patsies debacle, I gotta admit, the refs are throwing way too
    many flags, and ones that should never be thrown.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1058ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Tue Nov 08 1994 00:287
61.1059PTOS01::JACOBRCleveland=RECTUM of the World!!Tue Nov 08 1994 02:319
    Clevescum shutting out Arizona and the STEELERS losing to Arizona don't
    prove sh_t, when it comes to comparing teams.  
    
    Different days, different players, different games.
    
    And in regards to Clevescum fans, yer just different.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1060CAMONE::WAYTake me, subcreature!Tue Nov 08 1994 11:537
Yes, Glenn, you are right and I stand corrected.  It is Rikpen, er, uh, I
mean Ripken.

I can never keep that straight.....8^)


'Saw
61.1061Still one of the top 2 defense'sMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Nov 08 1994 13:4012
    The HIGH number of wins by cleveland is clearly related to there
    soft schedule.  But the 9 teams theyve played against combined
    have scored 1458pts in 9 games.  So there opponents score an average
    of 18pts per week, so Cleveland holds them all to a TD below average.
    
    I dont have time to figure out everyone's Defense but I still say
    Cleveland is the #1 or #2 defense... I dont care if they give up a 
    long slow drive at the end of the game when its out of reach that
    just pads the yards but if they keep them out of the endzone and 
    make the opposing team take FG then there a GREAT DEFENSE.
    
    
61.1062OLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindTue Nov 08 1994 14:1311
    
    If they had the #1 or #2 Defense, how could they lose to Denver? I dont
    doubt they give up very few point when playing against teams with an
    average .300 record. The Browns are in the same boat as last years
    Giants. Good record against bad teams.. wait till next year when their
    schedule from this years record pits them against the 1st or 2nd place
    teams in the league. 
    
      With any luck they'll go 3-4 for the remainder of the season and get
    knocked out in the wildcard game. With loses to Philly, KC,Dallas and
    Pittsburg and beating Houston, Giants and Seattle, finishing 10-6 
61.1063FRETZ::HEISERTHE BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, THE PATS SIP!Tue Nov 08 1994 14:503
    If Clevescum played the Cards again, I doubt they would shut them out,
    much less win.  It took Buddy 5 weeks to figure out who his best QB
    was.
61.1064MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Nov 08 1994 15:0030
    
   >> Nothing irks me more than throwing a bunch of ascii characters at a
   >> question, which don't shed any light on an answer.
    
      Yeah, well nothing irks me more than the deaths of innocent children
      on the violent inner city streets of America but I guess we all have
      different priorities.
  
   >> I was looking for opinion, nothing more. I was "curious" especially
   >> with your reference to a "quarterback controversy" and a to
   >> the receivers not getting open and dropping passes when they did get
   >> open. 

      And I gave you an opinion but you glossed over that. I can't (no 
      one can) conclusively say that Zolak would have performed better 
      than Bledsoe. All I can (and did) say is that he could hardly have
      done worse. The offense is stagnant and it can't be encouraging
      to the team to watch Bledsoe go into his shell at the first hint of
      pressure. Whereas Blesoe seems a little reticent these days, Zolak
      is cocky and confident whether he'd be that way after nine games
      of trying to work with that offense is also open to debate. Bledsoe
      doesn't seem to have that innate sense of when and where the pressure
      is coming, Zoalk exhibited that when he QB'd the Pats. Bledsoe has
      the better arm but not by a huge margin. The one other thing is 
      what effect will it have on the rest of the team to see the player
      dubbed 'The Franchise' benched? Nonetheless, I suspect it will
      take an injury to Drew to get Zolak in there.
    
    	
    
61.1065Saint Tommy, I'm not worthy!!!! :-(TOOK::HALPINThe BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIPTue Nov 08 1994 15:2733
    
    
   >>> Nothing irks me more than throwing a bunch of ascii characters at a
   >>> question, which don't shed any light on an answer.
   > 
   >   Yeah, well nothing irks me more than the deaths of innocent children
   >   on the violent inner city streets of America but I guess we all have
   >   different priorities.
    
    
    	Thank you for sharing that with us, Saint Tommy. Of course just
    disregard that I made my comments within the perspective of Sports
    notesfile. Yes, I must be in favor of straping innocent little kids
    into cars and driving them into the lake, right? St. Tommy says its
    so....
    
    	So who is patronizing today???
    
    	Lasted week you got all huffy about my use of the word "crap" in a
    public forum.
    
    	This week you make a indirect attack on my character.
    Please spare me any further advice on "Noting Etiquette", it'll be
    ignored as coming from somebody who doesn't practice what he
    preachs.... 
        
    >And I gave you an opinion but you glossed over that.
    
    	Very good, but the opinion didn't particularly address the issue I
    was curious about. Obfuscation....
    
    	My last words on the subject....
    
61.1066MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Nov 08 1994 15:4213
    
   >> This week you make a indirect attack on my character.
    
      I did? Loosen up, Jim and turn on your sarcasm sensors. I was
      kidding, man. Geez. I can't help but get the impression from
      some of your posts going way back when that you have a personal
      animosity towards me. I really don't care. If you didn't address
      anything to me, it would not bother me in the least. If you want
      to bs about sports that's cool, too. I just don't get all that 
      worked up about any of this and this is hardly worth any trouble.
    
    
       
61.1067This place will be a morgue next weekOLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindWed Nov 09 1994 20:1714
    
    
    So whats the line on the Philly game?  
    
    Lets see  Philly has gained 500+ more yards on Offense NFL #5
              Philly has given up 460+ fewer yards on Defense NFL #2
    
    All of this to a tougher schedule .421 to .304 
    
    Its been awfully quiet in here so far this week. No predictions from
    Hal or Icepork. What gives?
    
    
    
61.1068SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Nov 09 1994 21:2012
    
    	Don't be surprised by the Browns this week.  I will predict an
    	upset.
    
    		Remember...
    
    
    
    YOU CAN'T RUN WITH THE BIG DAWGS UNLESS YOU PUT YOUR ORANGE SNEAKERS
    ON!
    
    	WOOF!
61.1069MKFSA::LONGLike your freedom? Thank a Vet!Thu Nov 10 1994 11:509
    >>YOU CAN'T RUN WITH THE BIG DAWGS UNLESS YOU PUT YOUR ORANGE SNEAKERS
    >>ON!
    
    	Just the thought of seeing a bunch of grown men in orange sneakers
    	with a milkone in their mouths makes me glad I turned down that
    	job offer in Cleveland!
    
    
    	billl
61.1070so who's starting at QB?HBAHBA::HAASAnd this am the way it goes.Thu Nov 10 1994 15:390
61.1071SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Nov 10 1994 17:0015
    
    	Camp is closed and Bill won't say who will QB the DAWGS.....
    
    
    	remember....
    
    
    
    
    	TO RUN WITH THE BIG DAWGS, YOU HAVE TO TAKE OFF YOUR LEASH!
    
    
    
    		WOOF!
    
61.1072CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Thu Nov 10 1994 17:086
>    
>    	TO RUN WITH THE BIG DAWGS, YOU HAVE TO TAKE OFF YOUR LEASH!
>    
    
You wear a leash???????    

61.1073SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Nov 10 1994 21:229
    
    	I am a BIG DAWG!  I have no leash!  I wear my sneakers durring the
    	playoffs....
    	 
    	You are the one with the leash.....  
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1074PTOS02::JACOBRshe's proud to be my MifeFri Nov 11 1994 01:308
    
    >>    	I am a BIG DAWG!
    
    That explains the big piles of dung in yer notes, big dawgs leave big
    turds, who in turn play fer the Clevescum Brown(spot)s(tm).
    
    JaKe
    
61.1075Note of the Year?SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Nov 11 1994 11:439
|    	I am a BIG DAWG!  I have no leash!  I wear my sneakers durring the
|    	playoffs....
    	 
|    	You are the one with the leash.....  
    
    
|    	WOOF!
 
This note is truely a great contribution to ::SPROTS   
61.1076SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Nov 11 1994 14:434
    
    	Thank you!
    
    	GRRRRRRRRRRRRR...
61.1077Not a pretty siteSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Nov 11 1994 15:029
>    	I am a BIG DAWG!  I have no leash!  I wear my sneakers durring the
>    	playoffs....


	Unfortunately, sneaker be all that Hal wears during playoffs.  C'mon 
Buddy, get some more clothes on, and maybe your 'Spots can get past my 
Broncos.   NOT!

zamboni
61.1078ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sat Nov 12 1994 12:239
61.1079Yeah But Abbot!SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOSat Nov 12 1994 14:4914
    Nope,
    
    	The Donks haven't won a NFL championship.  But have the Browns
    won an important game since the inception of the Broncos?  Face it,
    the Browns demise can be directly traced to the Broncos entry in the 
    league.  
    
    	WOOF NOT!
    
    	A buddy of mine is making a trip from Mass to Philly to watch the 
    Browns.  I told him not to be disappointed if he spent all that time 
    and money to watch the 'Spots be splattered live.
    
    zamboni
61.1080ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sat Nov 12 1994 20:0812
61.1081Browns under .500, I don't think so...ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sun Nov 13 1994 21:4018
61.1082ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sun Nov 13 1994 21:405
61.1083Maybe 2nd placeSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOMon Nov 14 1994 10:2432
>    Its a tough call, but I would have to vote the #1 all-time choke team
>    as
>    
>    
>    The Denver Broncos...
>    
    
>    #2 the Minnesota Vikings...
>    
>    The thing about the Donks is...  they have never won and NFL
>    championship, and they are probably sub .500 lifetime = MEDIOCRE!

Yeah But,

	Think about it.  The Browns still can't beat the (in your words) the
"# 1 all-time choke team".  That in my book puts them in first place!


	Putting aside the necessary manly verbal jousting for a moment.
Browns looked might fine yesterday at the Vet.  I'd really thought the
Browns were going to get whupped by the Eagles yesterday.  Instead the
'Spots did the whupping.  We'll get to see if these Brown are really for
real when they stop in at KC this weekend, then in Dallas on prime time
in early December.  

	All in all, a nice weekeend for the Browns and their fans this
weekend.

	zamboni

DANG!  I said something nice about a 'Spot.  Quick, turn down the heat,
the zamboni is melting down!
61.1084ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Mon Nov 14 1994 10:296
61.1085ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Mon Nov 14 1994 14:283
61.1086on the brown wagonHBAHBA::HAASAnd this am the way it goes.Mon Nov 14 1994 15:0611
I am hereby offishally on the Brown's Bandwagon. I have become a
believer.

If'n they can win with Mark Rypien they must be fer reel.

And nexted Sunday, they is going to go into Kansas City and whoop that
there Joe Montana fella.

Doing my best Rick Flair, "wwwwwwwwweeeeeeeoooooooooooooooooooh"

TTom
61.1087Browns are up and down team....BSS::MENDEZMon Nov 14 1994 15:064
    The Browns are a good team but you have to admit the Broncos have OWNED
    them the last 5-10 years.  I know that Philly is tougher than the
    Broncos but why does Cleveland struggle against a team like Denver and
    then turn around and whup Philly????
61.1088ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Tue Nov 15 1994 00:116
61.1089PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeTue Nov 15 1994 01:4018
    re .1085
    
    Groaner, you truly are the southerly facing end of a northbound mule.
    
    Since when is there a JaKewatch when the Brown(spot)s(tm) catch the
    Eagles looking past them and get lucky????
    
    Now, if I pulled the normal stunt like you and HAL do once the 'SPots
    start losing, and distappeared totally in the middle of the season,
    that statement would have some merit.  BUT, even when the STEELERS went
    5-11, I was in this notesfiel Monday er Tuesday EACH WEEK>  SOmething
    you and HAL will never be able to claim.
    
    Put a dirty freakin' sock in yer fair weathered mouth and take a
    freakin hike.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1090SNORT!SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOTue Nov 15 1994 10:228
JaKe,

	Stop it man, you're killing me.  I just snorted 3 ounces of tea through 
my nose.

	Well said.

	zamboni
61.1091PTOS01::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeTue Nov 15 1994 12:008
    
>>	Stop it man, you're killing me.  I just snorted 3 ounces of tea through 
>>my nose.
    
    Decaf er regular?????
    
    JaKe
    
61.1092SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOTue Nov 15 1994 12:015
>    Decaf er regular?????

	Regular.  Need the hard stuff in the morning.

zamboni
61.1093PTOS01::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeTue Nov 15 1994 12:057
    3 ounces should be enuf to keep the sinuses clear fer the day.
    
    Good thing youe weren't eating a bagel when you read that er you could
    be on yer way t the hospital right now.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1094FOR EVER AND EVER AND EVER AND EVERSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Nov 15 1994 12:1021
    
    	Yes these DAWGS are for real.  How can there be any question?  But,
    	we all know there will always be those disbelievers.  I would like
    	to say that there are still questions in my mind though.  With
    	Mark in there at QB I feel good about the Browns chances of getting
    	to the big game because he won't loose the game for you.  With
    	Vinny as QB, I'm not so confident.  So now comes the controversy...
    	When Vinny is better, will he start over Mark?  I say no, don't
    	start Vinny unless the Browns are down big and they bring him in
    	durring a game.  I honestly don't see any team being as good as the
    	Browns right now.  I really think the DAWGS can match up well
    	against anyone in the league.  I would surely say the DAWGS are #1
    	in the AFC!!!
    
    
    		Go BROWNS!
    
    		Ya gotta love dem DAWGS!
    
    		WOOF (YOUR KING)
    
61.1095All hail King of the Bow-wows!MKFSA::LONGLike your freedom? Thank a Vet!Tue Nov 15 1994 13:2810
    I think every team has gone through this qb controversy at one 
    time or another.  Most coaches seem to stick with a starting qb
    and don't hesitate to put him right back in his original role
    after recovering from an injury.  After watching parts of a couple
    of Cleveland games I can see why you would rather have Rypien in
    there over Testeverde.  IMHO history says Vinnie will be put in
    as soon as he's healthy until he proves to the coach his ineptness.
    
    
    billl
61.1096We'll see...BSS::MENDEZTue Nov 15 1994 14:134
    .1094
    The dawgs couldn't even match-up with the Donks!!!!  But seriously...
    Randall had nothing but praise for the browns defense.
    
61.1097(8^)*PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeTue Nov 15 1994 18:5541
WAs helping my daughter do some research this weekend and came up with some
very interesting, but little known information.

She was assigned to do a paper on ecological disasters pertainig to the world's
worst dumps, and she chose Cleveland.

While many think that Cleveland was founded and named after Moses
Cleaveland(who later dropped the a) in about 1796, very few know how the naming
and founding of Cleveland actually came about.

Long before Cleaveland "discovered" the area, there was a tribe of Indians, the
Faucowee Indians, that roamed and laid claim to the area.  They controlled most
of the area that is now the state of Ohio.  Back then, they considered Buffalo
dung hazardous, and decided to dump it in one area.  They named this area
"Cleveland".  Faucowee language defined "Cleve" as huge placement of Buffalo
sh_t, and "land" as DUMP.

For the lasted 60 years of the tribe's existance, their chief, Ware Da, also
knkow as "Ware Da, Faucowee", had his warriors scoop up and deposit all of the
dung they came across in a 14 mile section of land near Lake Erie, which is
where Cleveland now is situated.  Historians estimate that over 430 billion
cubic yards of Buffalo, cow, and Faucowee dung, along with all of their tribal
trash was dumped within the current city limits, and the leeching of toxicity
from this dumping is the cause for the city having the most people rated as 
among the "Walking brain dead."

What has also gone unnoticed is that there was a warrior that started the fight
with the Apache tribe that lead to the Faucowee tribe being wiped out, who
continually taunted the Apache tribe with statements like, "have you Apache
ever won an Indian nation championship???".  The warrior was later castrated
and had his removed articles shoved down his throat, causing him to choke to
death.  The Faucowee would have had a chance to beat the Apache, but they
lacked "the drive" to do it, and "fumbled" their tomahawks horribly.

Even today, you can go to Cleveland Municipal Stadium and see the affected
"brain Dead" at the lake end of the stadium during football games, and you can
get to the buried dung just by scraping an inch or so below the playing
surface.



61.1098BIGQ::MCKAYTue Nov 15 1994 19:523
    Now that was funny even to the Groaner.  Good one jake
    
    Jimbo
61.1099Too Bad JaKeSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOWed Nov 16 1994 10:246
I waited to drink my tea this morning.  Now I'm not wearing it after
serious nasal decompression.

This note of yours explains a lot about Cleveland and their fans!

t
61.1100"NO too Heiser!!!!PTOS01::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeWed Nov 16 1994 12:305
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
61.1101Brownie Buggy heads to Kansas City.......SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Nov 18 1994 16:2727
    
    	Yes the Browns are getting some respect.......The Browns have made
    the USA Todays major articals twice this week and have also moved up
    on Joe Gibbs list from #6 to #3 behind #1 49ers and #2 Dallas.  The
    Browns are also picked to upset Kansas City this weekend.  The Brownie
    Buggy is getting full since the big win at the Vet last weekend where
    the DAWGS embarrassed the Eagles at home.  The DAWG Defense is the
    biggest reason for the Browns record but lets not overlook the offense
    either.  Mr. Hoard has played a huge part in this attack along with 
    Mr. Carrier who has stepped up in place of Michael Jackson since his
    injury.  
    	I also like the Browns this weekend against the Chiefs but in
    seeing them take care of the Eagles, I see the Browns also beating up
    on the Cowboys, Giants, Oilers, Seahawks, Squeelers, not to mention
    Miami and San Diego.  I like the Browns chances to taking the AFC and
    even like their chances of a big win in the Bowl.  
    	So, Bring on the Vikings, the 49ers, or the Cowboys....The Browns
    appear to be ready to be called the TEAM OF THE 90'S.
    	It has honestly surprised me that they have turned things around
    so quickly!  3 years wasn't too hard to take..........was it?????
    
    	ITS BEEN HELL!!!!
    
    
    	Go DAWGS!
    
    		WOOF!
61.1102Upset?CSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Fri Nov 18 1994 16:4715
>>         <<< Note 61.1101 by SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR "INDIANS CAVS BROWNS" >>>
>>                 -< Brownie Buggy heads to Kansas City....... >-

>>    on Joe Gibbs list from #6 to #3 behind #1 49ers and #2 Dallas.  The
>>    Browns are also picked to upset Kansas City this weekend.  The Brownie
>>    Buggy is getting full since the big win at the Vet last weekend where

Let me see if I'm getting this straight.  The Browns are number 3 behind
San Francisco and Dallas.  They're 8-2, while the Chiefs are 6-4, and
obviously rated lower than number 3.

Why would beating the Chiefs be considered an upset?  A team as good
as the Browns should be the favorite.

Jerry
61.1103ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Fri Nov 18 1994 17:116
    
> Why would beating the Chiefs be considered an upset?
    
    Because Las Vegas bettors say so.
    
    Joe
61.1104PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeFri Nov 18 1994 18:4333
    
    >>seeing them take care of the Eagles, I see the Browns also beating up
    >>on the Cowboys, Giants, Oilers, Seahawks, Squeelers, not to mention
    >>Miami and San Diego.  
    
    Lessee, here's how the Brown(spot)s(tm) will REALLY do:
    
    .vs. Cowboys   lose    38-10(Emmitt Smith and Michael Ervin have
    			         career days)
    
    .vs. Giants    win	   16-0 (Giants bring back Y.A. Tittle in futile
    				 attempt to find a QB whe can put points on 
    				 the board)
    .vs. Oilers    win 	    2-0 (who loses to the Oilers anyways)
    
    .vs. SEahawks  Lose	   14-13 (big upset here)
    
    .vs. STEELERS  Lose	    9-3   (STEELERS outdefense 'Spots)
    
    .vs. Miami     Lose    42-10  (Marino embarasses the Brown(spot)s(tm)
    			          defense)
    
    .vs. San Diego Lose    10-9   (World's most boring game as lack of
    				  offenses show up in both teams)
    
    >> I like the Browns chances to taking the AFC and
    >>even like their chances of a big win in the Bowl.  
    
    The only win they'll get in any bowl is a toilet bowl, but that's what
    they play their home games in anyways, ain't it??
    
    JaKe
    
61.1105ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sat Nov 19 1994 15:127
61.1106ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sat Nov 19 1994 15:134
61.1107PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeSun Nov 20 1994 19:468
    GROANER_WATCH..........GROUND ZERO!!!!!!
    
    Like he ain't got a terminal at home!!!
    
    Loving every minute of it as the Brown(spot)s(tm) fall to KC!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.1108PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeSun Nov 20 1994 19:4915
    
    >>DISCLAIMER  I WILL BE OUT UNTIL A WEEK FROM MONDAY.  So IF the Browns
    >>happen to lose to KC, forget about the iceWATCH garbage...
      or I'll
      ^^^^^^^
    >>be unbearable when I come back!
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Yer unbearable anyways, so what stunt could you pull to get any
    worse?????
    
    Groaner Watch   Hour 1!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.1109PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeSun Nov 20 1994 19:547
    With his idle threat, Groaner show he cain dish it out but defn=initely
    cain't take it, just like ANY Clevescum'er!!!!
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.111057045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Nov 21 1994 03:097
    
    And lets see how long it takes HAL to make an appearance. If you are
    interested in joining a betting pools on this (no money, of course)
    send mail to metsny::francus
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1111Was out of town, as usualMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRMon Nov 21 1994 11:0311
Just saw the results of JaKe's daughter's historical and archaeological
researches.  Excellent stuff.  I've only been in Cleveland once, way
back in 1965, but that certainly explains a great deal.

And did you notice the most astonishing thing about it?  It was entirely
in English!!  JaKe, did your daughter write it for you?

And finally, am I wrong, or does it sound like JaKe is going into serious
Groaner-withdrawal?

Steve
61.1112WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MLets Go HoyasMon Nov 21 1994 11:224
    
    
    
         Hal watch hour 1...
61.1113ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Mon Nov 21 1994 11:5613
    
>    GROANER_WATCH..........GROUND ZERO!!!!!!
    
>    Like he ain't got a terminal at home!!!
    
    He does - I don't think he's got one in Cleveland, though...
    
>    Loving every minute of it as the Browns fall to KC!!!!
    
    Well, I'm glad the Browns were able to provide you with such
    enjoyment.  Personally, I was rather glad I didn't have to watch.
    
    Joe
61.1114SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Nov 21 1994 12:039
    
    	Looks like the Browns lost a game they should have won by the clips
    I saw yesterday.....fumble on the 4 yard line.....fumble near the end
    of the game with the Browns driving.....then, what is the deal with all
    the penalties???  Bottom line is .... we need a quarterback.  Must have
    been a good game to watch though.
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1115hat trickedHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Nov 21 1994 13:409
I'll take the credit for thised loss..

Firsted of all, I jumped on the Cleveburgh bandwagon. Then I signed me up
a Brown Dawg, Leroy Hoard, for FFL. Then, the coupe de grass, I started
the guy. 

Nice fumble there, Leroy...

TTom
61.1116Tradition?CSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Mon Nov 21 1994 13:5211
>>               <<< Note 61.1115 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>
>>                                -< hat tricked >-

>>Nice fumble there, Leroy...

I didn't see the game, but someone said something about a fumble on
the 4 yard line.  So, did a Cleveland running back fumble close to
the goal line?


I thought that was a tradition in Cleveland.
61.1117stuck inside of Cleveburgh with the Modell blues aginHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Nov 21 1994 14:018
Byner never had a chance to relive his former glory. Leroy upheld the
tradition in fine fashion, however.

One of the better outcomes of all this is the trouble in Paradise with
Belichik, Vinnie and Rypien. Some QB controversy, there.   Nobody wanted
any of 'em and now they is all stuck together.

TTom
61.1118SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Nov 21 1994 14:156
    
    	It was Rypien who fumbled twice...once on the 4 and the other on
    the last drive.  The other fumble and INT, I don't know who was to
    blame.  After the big game last week, I guess this was expected.
    
    	WOOF
61.1119Congrats to the Steelers for taking the AFC LEADMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 21 1994 16:2714
    Yes CLeveland has finally lost there AFC Central lead to the Steelers
    but it may be a short term stay at #1 for Pittsburg but for New Pitt
    is the AFC Leader and if the season were to end today THEY WOULD HAVE
    HFA THROUGHOUT THE PLAYOFFS... How about that...
    
    but this week we see Clevland at home hosting Houston, yes the 1-9
    houston oilers who are managing a whopping 13 pts per game.  On the
    other end Pittsburg has to travle to LA and face the Raiders, after
    a slow start the Raiders find themselves back in the hunt at 6-5 and
    cant afford to lose to pitt... Will be a close one.  7 games this week
    have 2 teams facing off that are fighting for the Playoffs... 5 weeks
    left who will rise to the top.
    
    								mab
61.1120BIGQ::MCKAYMon Nov 21 1994 17:324
    Houston is so bad that, in our FFL league no one even plays Slaughter,
    Jefferies, or Givens anymore....
    
    Jimbo
61.1121maybeHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Nov 21 1994 17:519
I've got Gary Brown on my team and like the real Oilers, Brown has taken
a seat on the pine.

Supposedly, Lorenzo White is the RB Main, at least for now.

I'm looking for Houston to show us something as they "celebrate" their
new coach and the Giants continue their decline. 

TTom
61.112224661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Nov 21 1994 17:543
    Groaner-watch, Day 1.
    
    Mark.
61.1123He's doing pretty darn good tooMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 21 1994 18:072
    I had slaughter and dropped him in favor of the Rookie Darney Scott
    from Cinncy...
61.1124PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeTue Nov 22 1994 03:4810
    
    
    
    G  R  O  A  N  E  R   _   W  A  T  C  H
    
    	D  A  Y	      2
    
    
    JaKe
    
61.1125PTOS01::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeTue Nov 22 1994 14:587
    GROANER_WATCH   STARDATE 2.5
    
    ANd he's probably working, just lying to us that he was going to be
    out, just to scart to show his face in here!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.1126FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Nov 22 1994 15:011
    I think he is gone.  He posted this week's rotis roster last Friday.
61.1127WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MLets Go HoyasTue Nov 22 1994 15:033
       
    
    see 61.1106
61.112857042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Nov 22 1994 16:366
re: .1106

that line about being insufferable is a real hoot considering that Groaner
would be insufferable no matter what.

The Crazy Met
61.1129Turkey on your mind???????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MLets Go HoyasTue Nov 22 1994 17:065
    
    
       Insufferable??
    
        Read it again TCW!
61.1130besides I don't like turkey57042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Nov 22 1994 17:313
ok, unbearable, same difference

The Crazy Met
61.1131PTOS01::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeTue Nov 22 1994 17:396
    Unbearable, usufferable, being a total a$$hole.
    
    All would be an improvement fer him.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1132Pains me to say this... But He is king...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Nov 23 1994 12:1625
    Ok we've all had to put up with some very UNVEARABLE, UNSUFFERABLE
    Cleveland fans over the years.. These fans claim they have the
    best Basketball, Football, Baseball and Hockey Players :-) and when
    there teams fall short (Which is all of the time) they make GREAT
    excuse's and remind us that they still have the World Champion
    Nose Rods who won the Nickle Pushing up a ramp championship the last
    11 years straight...
    
    But these fans are consistent and for the past 6 years hal has more
    then likly been picking the Browns every week in the KOH contest with
    not so great results.. But this year him Picking the Browns each week
    earned him WIN's and he outright WON the KOH, now was it Football
    knowledge, we'll judging from his 2-10 in the pool I'd say no.. But
    sometimes consistency pays off, and even though it pains me.. HE IS
    THE KING and should get his crown... Id like to think all of us can
    be obnoxious at times, of course keeping up with cleveland fans would
    be tough...
    
    But I bow to the New King, he won it fair and square and should be
    recognized for his greatness...
    
    Of course when his browns get trampled in the WC game we can all come
    in here and razz him... But he'll still be king...
    
    								mab
61.113356953::HALPINThe Browns SIP!!! The Pats are AWESOME!!!!!!Wed Nov 23 1994 12:3713
    
    >Ok we've all had to put up with some very UNVEARABLE, UNSUFFERABLE
    >Cleveland fans over the years.. These fans claim they have the
    >best Basketball, Football, Baseball and Hockey Players :-)
    
    
    	You forgot their claim to the best minor league soccer players
    in the world, also... What were they, the Nestle Crunchies or something
    like that???
    
    JimH :-)
    
    
61.1134ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Wed Nov 23 1994 12:5116
    
>    	You forgot their claim to the best minor league soccer players
>    in the world, also... What were they, the Nestle Crunchies or something
>    like that???
    
    Cleveland Crunch.  Not minor league soccer, either (well, OK, I
    guess it depends - if you consider European basketball minor
    league basketball, then yes.  I guess I tend to consider them
    seperate entities, with the CBA being minor league basketball
    and the European leagues being "major league", within their own
    country).
    
    BTW, if you enjoy indoor soccer, they're showing a fair amount of
    it on ESPN2...
    
    Joe
61.1135ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sun Nov 27 1994 15:3938
61.113657045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleSun Nov 27 1994 17:297
    
    We in ::sprotsland have deatl with MrT and Groaner you are no
    MrT; dream on guy. Good to see you finally showed up a week after the 
    Browns lost.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1137ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sun Nov 27 1994 17:514
61.1138ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sun Nov 27 1994 17:514
61.1139ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Sun Nov 27 1994 20:123
61.1140PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeMon Nov 28 1994 02:0910
    
    >>Dawgs pound Oilers... take sole possession of first place at 9-3.
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Boy, weren't that part of the statement short lived???  'Spots are now
    "tied" fer first, although the SUPERIOr STEELERS hold the tiebreaker
    over the Mistakes by the Lake.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1141PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeMon Nov 28 1994 02:1218
    
    
    >>3. I clearly stated that I was out of town last week without access to
    >>a terminal.  This week, regardless of whether the Browns win or not, it
    >>will be payback time for starting with the iceWATCH!  WARNING, it may 
    >>just be better to stay out of SPORTS and set seen at the end of the
    >>week - the alternative is to wear out your next unseen button.
    
    Lessee, we see a note from Groaner, we hit nexted unseen, 
    
    BUSINESS AS USUAL, so what's new???
    
    RE Celtics:  Lessee Groaner, they DID win an NBA Championship er two or
    thre in RECENT HISTORY, unlike yer Brown(spot)s(tm) who ain't won sh_t
    in 30+ years, and ain't come close to a Super Bowl.
    
    JaKe
    
61.114257045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Nov 28 1994 02:229
    Wasn't it Groaner that was doing a JaKe watch when he was told over and
    over again that JaKester worked second shift? nah, couldn't be for
    Groaner is an honorable man (but then again so was Brutus) - but I
    wonder if Groaner has enough of an education to understand the
    reference, probably not.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
    
61.1143ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 28 1994 12:043
61.1144ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 28 1994 13:582
61.1145OLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindMon Nov 28 1994 14:023
    
    Technically the brownspots are in 2nd since Steelers have better division
    record! 
61.114657042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Nov 28 1994 14:235
re: .1145

Don't let reality cloud your statements! :-) Groaner certainly won't

The Crazy Met
61.1147PTOS01::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm DTN: 422-7253Mon Nov 28 1994 15:0513
    >>Other than Basketball has New England (sure, Cleveland stands on its
>>    own as a city, the Pats represent 6 freaking states and they still
>>    couldn't win on an instant lottery ticket!) ever had a championship
>>    team in a major sport?
    
        
>>    Hockey... give me a break... hockey is about as major in the US as 
>>    Candlepin bowling.  NO MAJOR NETWORK TV CONTRACT!  Cable doesn't
>>    count, and hopefully the NHL will fold as a result of this strike.
    
  When Cleveland won their latest major championship, did that sport have a
    major network TV contract? was TV even invented?    
    
61.1148Hockey in the most popular sport in the NE live with itAD::HEATHCan the Pats duplilcate it???Mon Nov 28 1994 15:068
    
    
    Paul...
    
     Is Fox a cable channel?  What about ABC last two years.  Come on
    man crawl out from under that sludge.
    
    j/
61.1149ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Mon Nov 28 1994 15:1910
    
>  When Cleveland won their latest major championship, did that sport have a
>  major network TV contract? was TV even invented?    
    
    Hmmm... the Browns last won in '64, the Tribe in '48.  TV (and network
    TV for that matter) was around well before that (OK, network TV and
    the Tribe's last WS were not far off in time).  As to a major network
    contract, I have no idea...
    
    Joe
61.1150MKFSA::LONGHey N.E., Keep RIGHT except to pass!!!Mon Nov 28 1994 15:215
    Joe, you musta lost that bet REAL bad to 'still' be saddled with that
    p-name you're sportin'
    
    
    billl
61.1151ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Mon Nov 28 1994 15:287
    
    Nah, I just decided that I liked it so much (and it's such a ridiculous
    statement this season, though I suppose less ridiculous now than it was
    when I earned it), that I'd keep it, at least until something better
    comes along...
    
    Joe
61.1152ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 28 1994 15:514
61.1153FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Nov 28 1994 16:492
    How many Super Bowls have the Skidmarks(tm) been in?  Even the Pats
    have been in 1!
61.1154ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 28 1994 16:523
61.1155ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 28 1994 17:333
61.1156OLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindMon Nov 28 1994 17:362
    
    ,and take Icepork with you
61.1157ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 28 1994 18:043
61.1158PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeMon Nov 28 1994 18:229
    
>>Did anyone catch the Browns game yesterday, they sure looked good.
    
    My dead grandmother would look good .vs. the Oilscum.
    
    Big Freakin' deal
    
    JaKe
    
61.1159;^)CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Nov 28 1994 18:245
 I guess your dead grandmother's got something on the Giants then....

 mike

61.116057045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Nov 28 1994 20:375
    and those mighty Steelers didn't look real good against the Oilers,
    either.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1161PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeMon Nov 28 1994 20:5228
    
    >>  <<< Note 61.1160 by 57045::FRANCUS "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>

    >>and those mighty Steelers didn't look real good against the Oilers,
    >>either.
    
    >>The Crazy Met
    
    Lessee, the Spots beat the Oilscum this year, 34-10 yesterday, and a
    paltry 11-8 in the firsted game.
    
    The STEELERS beat the Oilscum 30-14 in week 5, and 12-9 in week 10.
    
    Looks like both teams had a good game and a bad game against the
    Oilscum.
    
    Sure, if the STEELERS had any semblance of an offense, they'd be 10-2
    or maybe even 12-1 right now, but they're not, they're 9-3 and in the
    drivers seat right now.  
    
    Groaner ain't got no room talking about who's playing fer the STEELERS
    at QB, what with the 'Spots needing a Tampa Bay reject to have a chance
    at winning.
    

    JaKe
    
    
61.116257045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Nov 28 1994 23:164
    when do the Steelers and Browns play? I expect to see a p_name wager on
    it.
    
    The Crazy Met
61.1163PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeMon Nov 28 1994 23:596
    Sunday, December 18th, 1pm.
    
    I'll risk my p_name on the game.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1164ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Nov 29 1994 11:074
61.1165Boston Sports RULEMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Dec 01 1994 18:1522
    Well I know we can go back and say from 1784-1803 The Cleveland Hogs
    won 6 Log cutting championships..
    
    But if compare all of the Big-4 to Big-4 sports of Cleveland with
    Boston (Face it the Patriots are a boston team) boston has had superior
    teams in every sport.  Pats went to the SB in 85, Celtics won a few in
    the 80's, RedSox's were in there in the 80's as were the Bruins.. They
    may not have won them but there were in there.  When was the last time
    ANY CLEVELAND MAJOR TEAM was even in the Championship game ???
    
    Every year it seems like at least one of the Boston teams are in it
    (Downslide in the 90's) but they keep it intresting and competative.
    
    The Browns are having a good year but if you look at the Browns and
    Pats the Pats are in much better shape, I really dont see the browns
    winning it in the next 3-5 years.  They will more then likely get worse
    before they get better, where as the pats are at least exciting to
    watch and have that good ol Potential Factor :-)
    
    Hope The Dawgs keep there Guard up, the Giants have won 2 in a row :-)
    
    									mab
61.1166ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 01 1994 20:1018
61.1167Boston has no complaint s25022::BREENReigns, Or so the sages speak.Thu Dec 01 1994 20:1115
    The bruins have a worthless record which I will note anyway:
    
    	Most consecutive playoff appearances 1968-present (From Orr's
    second season)
    
    	Redsox had 20+  .500 or greater seasons from 1967 on till '92(?)
    5 division or pennant flags, a playoff, twice 1 game out (72,81), and
    in contention late in 73,74,77,79,91
    	Celtics are in their first long term decline (>5 years with no
    championship).
    
    	"Hapless" Patriots actually were competitive from mid seventies to
    late 80s with half dozen or so playoff appearances, '86 and nearly
    always in playoff contention.  If you take the post merger era of nfl
    I'd think Browns and Patriots would have very similar records.
61.1168FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Dec 01 1994 20:386
>    The Boston teams in the 80's were more successful in the NBA and MLB,
>    but not in the NFL.
    
    The Pats made it to the Super Bowl in the '85-'86 season and were in
    the playoffs a few years afterwards.  The SB appearance is 1 more than
    the Browns have.
61.1169ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 02 1994 01:5739
61.1170ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 02 1994 01:584
61.1171ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 02 1994 11:297
61.1172Jordan's Sacrificial CadaversFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Dec 02 1994 14:012
    How many NBA championship series have the Cadavers played in?  Probably
    the same number of Super Bowls that SkidMarks have been in.
61.1173ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 02 1994 14:0925
61.1174I never heard thatBSS::MENDEZFri Dec 02 1994 14:262
    It wold have been tragic if the CELTICS season ended that way...
    
61.1175FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Dec 02 1994 14:327
    >    How many NBA championships have the Suns won?
    
    0.  But they've won 2 more conference championships than the Cadavers.
    You know the Celtics record well enough to know you can't debate it.
    
    If Cleveland keeps this up, they'll get demoted to the CBA where they
    belong.
61.1176ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Fri Dec 02 1994 15:0833
    
>    If Cleveland keeps this up, they'll get demoted to the CBA where they
>    belong.
    
    Huh?  The Cavs certainly have not been a model franchise (the mere
    existence of Ted Stepien should tell you that), but they certainly
    have had their moments.  Other than the Stepien years (and a couple
    of recovery years afterwards, the team has been fairly good.
    Since SPORTS seems to be a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately crowd,
    compare the last 5 years.  The Cavs certainly haven't been the best
    team, but they've accomplished more than...
    
    1) Orlando
    2) New Jersey
    3) Miami
    4) Washington
    5) Boston
    6) Philly
    7) Charlotte
    8) Atlanta
    9) Milwaukee
    10) Denver
    11) Dallas
    12) Minnesota
    13) Seattle
    14) Golden State
    15) Sacramento
    16) LA Clippers 
    
    ...all of which doesn't add up to a championship, but it does leave
    them quite a few steps above the CBA...
    
    Joe
61.1177UglyHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 02 1994 15:223
But, Joe, them uniforms has gots to go...

TTom
61.1178ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Fri Dec 02 1994 16:0510
    
> But, Joe, them uniforms has gots to go...
    
    No argument there.
    
    Mark Price's diplomatic comment when he first saw the new uniforms:
    
    'Well, they're different...'
    
    Joe
61.1179ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 02 1994 16:1337
61.1180Go ACCer!HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 02 1994 16:135
Mark Price is really carrying this team. Lasted night's replays looked
like he got into one of his zones and three-pointed the Cavs to the win
at Milwaukee.

TTOm
61.1181Cleveland and Boston often crossed paths25022::BREENBut in the land of the One-eyed MenFri Dec 02 1994 16:2719
    Well with a big victory lead from 1970 thru 1975 and an overall win
    difference of 3 the Pat's certainly had an edge on Browns from
    "mid-seventies to end of 80s".  Pats misfortunes from last year of
    Fluite to present need no elaboration.
    
    Now the Indians were the one of the top teams in baseball in the 40s
    and 50s with perhaps the best pitching in the history of the game.
    Unfortunately the Yankees were overloaded during that period and the
    tribe needed 111 wins to salvage one pennant and a Joe McCarthy brain
    aneurism (Denny who) to capture there last world series.
    
    Ironically two of the best Cavalier teams in '76 and 84(ish) were
    derailed by the Celtics.  The second on a George Karl mental error.
    
    And it was the Cleveland WHA club that stole Gerry Cheevers away from
    Bruins putting a stop to that dynasty.
    
    In 1954 Cleveland beat Boston 20 of 22 times, the Sox split with the
    Yankees.  There was the pennant.
61.1182Groaner's Rules for Clevelander BehaviorFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Dec 02 1994 17:1320
    1. Try to belittle an opponents team by accusing them of not winning a
       championship even though your own team hasn't won one either.  
    2. If you're from the Boston area, accuse them of living in the past
       when they reference their championships, but it is okay for you to
       mention ancient Cleveland championships that aren't even competed
       for today and haven't been for over 30 years.
    3. If your team has not won any championships, go to Rule 1.
    4. In regards to Rule 3, if the team is from Cleveland this is all the
       more reason to use it.
    5. Since Cleveland hasn't even won, placed, or shown in any of the sports
       under debate, bring in irrelevant data like geographic locations
       whether the opponent supports the team from their home state or the
       state they currently live in.  Remember facts aren't important.
    6. If all else fails, fill the conference with junk notes and waste
       diskspace until they writelock it or disband it, and promote a king who 
       goes 2-12 in NFL pools with yet even more junk notes, despite rational 
       pleas from the host to act like an adult.
    7. Given rule 6, if successful in shutting down the conference, you will 
       no longer have to defend your sorry-assed teams to informed sports fans 
       with a brain to know better.
61.1183ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 02 1994 18:106
61.1184PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceFri Dec 02 1994 18:4426
    
    >>I guesss now that the Browns are ranked #3 in defense in the AFC (using
    >>the meaningless method - yards given up), 
    
    STEELERS are ranked #3 in the NFL, FWIW.
    
    
    >>still #1 in points yielded by
    >>far, the anti-Browns clowns will have to come up with some other stuff
    >>to dump on.
    
    So they've held the pathetic offenses to 24 points less than their
    closest follower, the STEELERS, although after a rough start, the
    STEELERS are playing better defense than the Brown(spot)s(tm) and in
    the lasted 8 weeks, they've held opponents to mucho less points than
    the Spots over the same period.
    
    I'd be willing to bet that if you ask 100 people to choose between the
    STEELER defense and the 'Spots defense on who they'd rather have, right
    now the STEELERS would probably win about 75 to 25.
    
    The 'Spots will finish, at best 11-5, maybe even 10-6, and will fall in
    game 15 to the STEELERS.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1185restatementHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 02 1994 18:5411
>    1. Try to belittle an opponents team by accusing them of not winning a
>       championship even though your own team hasn't won one either.  

Oops. Sorry to bring in facks to otherwise stimulating discussion but
them there Dawgs most certainly have won championships. In couple of
leagues. I guess you mean to equate winning the Super Bowl, which now
settles the NFL, with winning the NBA Championship.

But I still say the Suns have a lot better uniforms than the Cavs...

TTom
61.1186FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Dec 02 1994 19:067
>    2. If you're from the Boston area, accuse them of living in the past
>       when they reference their championships, but it is okay for you to
>       mention ancient Cleveland championships that aren't even competed
>       for today and haven't been for over 30 years.
    
    TTom, you forgot rule 2.  The only NFL championship people care about
    is called the Super Bowl.
61.1187changes are the sameHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 02 1994 19:1216
re: Boston area.

Hail, I dont know who lives where. There's a lot of people in ::SPROTS
who root for teams in cities other than where they live.

I should, however, mention that Cleveland not only has won championships
but that they have a history of championships, albeit afore the super
bowl.

About the fixation on the Super Bowl, I guess we'll have to wait until
there's the Super Series in NBA and then ask them Celtics fans if'n they
ever won one...

We won't have to be asking this of Phoenix, in any case. ;-)

TTom
61.1188PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceFri Dec 02 1994 19:259
    Groaner, 
    
    given a choice between yer "rules" and TTom's, TTom's is as correct in
    describing yer ways as it cain get, whilst yers is inane BS, but then
    again, so are 99.99999999999931825(scientific study has been done) of
    your entries in here.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1189ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 02 1994 19:355
61.1190PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceFri Dec 02 1994 23:0610
    Okay, so it was Heiser, and put yer condescending air you got about you
    in the freakin' trash.  Like you never make a mistake???  Oh yeah, you
    make one every day rooting fer the 'Spots.
    
    Hope ya fall off a bridge
    
    Have a crappy weekend Groaner
    
    JaKe
    
61.1191ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 04 1994 22:2113
61.1192ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 04 1994 22:236
61.1193GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Sun Dec 04 1994 23:182
    HAL watch, day 1
    
61.1194'Spots in a free fall.PTOS01::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 05 1994 01:1716
    The Brown(spts)s(tm) fell back to earth and played the best game they
    were capable of against the NFC East powerhouse Giants.
    
    'Spots will finish NO BETTER than 10-6, while the STEELERS will finish
    no worse than 12-4.
    
    Ya heerd it here firsted.
    
    GROANER_WATCH MOnth 1, HAL Watch Day 1.
    
    Now, who had the nuts to log into Groaner's account and enter a note
    today???  I know it wasn't Groaner, cause when his team goes into the
    tank, he dissappears REAL fast.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1195WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MSTEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAMMon Dec 05 1994 10:597
    
    
       Vinnie makes Neil Odonnell look like Bart Starr!!!
    
    
    
    Chap
61.1196ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 11:287
61.1197ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 11:283
61.1198ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 11:359
61.1199just another meaningless statCNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 05 1994 11:359
 well I saw the same trivia question and the answer would be the Brownies
 but most of those playoff appearences where before they join the AFC so
 I don't think they should count for them as the AFC with the most in 
 which case I'd have to go with the Raiders..........

 and of course the all-time leaders is the Giants.........

 mike
61.1200ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 11:375
61.1201WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MSTEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAMMon Dec 05 1994 12:037
    
    
         So that means the Raiders is the Answer right?
    
    
    
    Chap
61.1202CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Dec 05 1994 12:0310
Boy, did Vinnie look bad yesterday or what?

Browns should have won -- Dan Reeves gave them enough chances to slam the
door on the hapless Giants.

Still, it was nice to see all the folks who are seriously in need of
a life (they sit just behind the end zone there) get all disappointed.


'Saw
61.1203That will be Hal's excuseWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MSTEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAMMon Dec 05 1994 12:229
    
    
    
         And BTW that was a fumble late in the 4th that the refs had ruled
    the Giant Receiver down!
    
    
    
    Chap
61.1204depends upon your point of viewCNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 05 1994 12:254
 but the Giants stayed in the NFC which is the old NFL so they count....

 ;^)
61.1205another jake in the makingROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 12:373
61.1206ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Mon Dec 05 1994 12:4214
    
>    The Browns fell back to earth and played the best game they
>    were capable of against the NFC East powerhouse Giants.
    
    B^)
    
    Good one, JaKe.
    
    The Browns played perhaps the worst game they were capable of
    playing, at least on offense.   Not that it was that much worse
    than their standard game, save in frequency of turnovers, but
    still...
    
    Joe
61.1207MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Dec 05 1994 12:534
    
      Meanwhile...
    
      The Browns get a reality smack.
61.1208ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 13:015
61.1209Haven't been so ill since Bubby's mum left town...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Dec 05 1994 13:2514
>    Because the people in Cleveland love football, they are "in serious
>    need of a life"?  Give me a break. 
    
    Myself, I had absolutely no problems with FOX (the sexy network that
    aims to please) giving us a eyeful of (and a shattered eardrum from) 
    one of those stunning Cleveland beauties Groaner's boasted of in the
    past, in all her stately dignity.  In the words of the poet Hal, 
    arf, arf!

    As for the game, yes, yes, YES!
    
    glenn
     
61.1210CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Dec 05 1994 13:2725
>    Because the people in Cleveland love football, they are "in serious
>    need of a life"?  Give me a break. 

What would you like? A broken arm, a broken jaw?  8^) 8^) 8^)   (a little
rugby humor there).


No, they're in need of a life because they're like those folks who sit
at home and watch Country Line Dancing on TNN, or those folks who sit and
watch QVC day in and day out, or those folks who love to watch Elvis
impersonators....

I love the Giants, and I'll wear my Giants jacket, but I don't think I'd
ever go paint my face, bark like a dog, and in general act like I need
a life, over a football game....


And whoa, did you see the heiffer they showed who was screaming after
Leroy Hoarde made that nice (and it was nice) TD run?   Whoa -- is that
what the wimmin are like in Cleveland?   She made the Washington Hoggettes
look bee-yoo-tee-ful!


'Saw

61.1211CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Dec 05 1994 13:3016
What did you folks think of Jerry Glanville?


Personally, I never thought I'd see the man do something worse than he
does when he drives a NASCAR stock car.  But yesterday I got a chance to
hear him call color.

Whoa, does he suck enough or what?


Jerry, in case you don't know, the Cleveland QB's name was Vinnie Testaverde.

And Jerry, in case you don't know, you don't need to yell so much.


Can he really be on one of their top tandems??????
61.1212Didn't watch yesterday, however.SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Dec 05 1994 13:345
| What did you folks think of Jerry Glanville?

"The Worst".  He wrests the title from Joe Namath.  

Makes me want to wear black whgen I listen to him.
61.1213WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MSTEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAMMon Dec 05 1994 13:347
    
    
        That is about the 4th time I heard  Glanville doing games this year
    and I swear he gets worse and worse every week
    
    
    Chap
61.1214Go Leroy! Watta FFL Player!HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Dec 05 1994 13:4812
Down here abouts, we were spared watching and listening to the, uh, gem.

Suffice it to say, my main, Leroy Hoard scored a TD for the Doovers.
'Nuff said.

Cleveland picked a bad game to choke on. They go to Dallas (ouch!) and
then to Pittsburgh. You don't think there'll be any huffing and puffing
about that game in here, do you? 

Then there's the lasted mop up, with Seattle visiting.

TTom
61.1215CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 05 1994 13:495
 I like him myself. He's not boring or over technical. He could be a bit
 less excited but he does provide some insight that other don't. 

 mike
61.1216And the sound of his voice is annoying too!!!!TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 05 1994 13:4916
    
    
    
    	Yup, Glaanville s*cks. I love it when he calls for a reply to show
    how so-and-so did something in the previous play and then the replay
    show the guys doing something completely different.
    
    	One that I recall from last night was a tipped-pass by a defensive
    end. Jerry works the tele-strator to show us how this guy faked the
    blitz, and then drifted out into the flat for pass coverage. Replay
    shows the DE blitzing, and jumping up in the QBs face to tip the pass!
    
    	Thank you for that expert analysis Jerry!!! :-)
    
    JimH
    
61.1217ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 14:1917
61.1218I THOUGHT YOU COULDWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MSTEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAMMon Dec 05 1994 14:334
    
    
    
    CAN YOU SAY 9-7????
61.1219PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 05 1994 14:3814
    Sawmain,
    
    Them peoples don't paint there faces or wear masks that sit in them end
    zone seats.  Them peoples(term used loosely) are the mutants that have
    been produced by the toxicity of the Clevescum area, and the 'Spots
    give them cheap seats cause they're IQ's are so low, the only thang
    they cain do is bark.
    
    BTW, the heiffer ya saw is this year's "Miss/Mr. Cleveland".
    
    A 10 to a CLevescumite is a "1" in Pittsburgh.
    
    JaKe
    
61.122010 wins, wild cardHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Dec 05 1994 14:4012
Now if'n they lose to Seattle we have a real choke job.

Naw, worst for Cleveland is 10-6. 

Let's assume for purposes of this discussion that the Cowboys beat the
Browsn. That would be 9-5. The way the Eagles are playing, the Steelers
should beat 'em. That would be 11-3. At that point, the best the Browns
can hopefor is a tie-breaker if'n they beat the Steelers.

Pittsburgh closes at San Diego, certainly a team to reckon with.

TTom
61.1221PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Dec 05 1994 15:3313
  I'm laughin so hard after Jake's last reply, it'ss hard too type in this 
  reply.

>      Meanwhile...
    
>      The Browns get a reality smack.

  Yep, and next week, ageenst the 'Boys, it's likely to be a nukelear
  exposion instead of a smack. I just hope the 'Spots have something left when
  they come Pittsburgh, I don't want the Humane Society trying to call off
  the game cuz of creulty to the Dawgs.

	Keith
61.1222Love them Y.A. Tittle unis!MKFSA::LONGMon Dec 05 1994 15:585
    I sure hope Groaner and Hal get their ankles taped so's they 
    don't twist an ankle jumping OFF the Brownswagon.
    
    
    billl
61.1223SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Dec 05 1994 16:003
| Title:  Love them Y.A. Tittle unis!
 
Ditto!
61.1224SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Mon Dec 05 1994 16:087
    
    	Where is the Seattle/Browns game at the end of the year being
    played? Could be interesting if its in Seattle (Late Game). The
    Browns would then no what other teams have done. If they have to
    win, the extra pressure could make them choke.
    
    Ron
61.1225at the Dawg PoundHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Dec 05 1994 16:216
The games in Cleveland.

The Browns don't need any extra pressure to choke. See yesterday's
performance.

TTom
61.122630008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Dec 05 1994 16:347
    	RE: DawgPound...
    
    	I like the 500 pound guy in the endzone with the dog mask on.
    FOX surveys revealed that women find him very sexy, hence the increased
    exposure.
    
    				   /Don
61.1227ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 16:414
61.1228ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 16:437
61.1229CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Dec 05 1994 17:0117
>    Gee, I thought JAKE worked third shift and didn't have a terminal at
>    home, but somehow he gets logged on after a Browns loss.


No.

Jake works SECOND shift, and has a laptop at home, but sometimes, as is
the case with most of our stuff it seems lately, his laptop goes on the
blink.

(We've had lots o' hardware problems in here of late....)



'Saw
    

61.1230ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 17:033
61.1231CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Dec 05 1994 17:115
>    Oh, so my terminal didn't work is a valid excuse... i'll file that for
>    future use.

Whatever floats yer boat.....

61.1232PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 05 1994 18:188
    Groaner, at least when my laptop din't work, I got word to someone and
    they put a note in for me.  So, if you do that, it's a valid excuse.
    
    BTW, since when am I REQUIRED to make an entry in here before 3:30,
    start of my shift, eh???
    
    JaKe
    
61.1233PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 05 1994 18:2014
    
    >>	I like the 500 pound guy in the endzone with the dog mask on.
    
    Slasher, see my earlier note, that was not a mask, I REPEAT, not a
    mask.  In addidtion to the toxicity of the Clevescum area, there have
    been some other reported "going's on" that have resulted in grown
    beings, with human(again, term used loosely) bodies and the faces of
    dogs.  These things are native to the northeastern Ohio area and are
    not found anywhere else outside of there.
    
    Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
    
    JaKe
    
61.1234ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 18:3013
61.1235PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 05 1994 18:3212
    
    >>	root for:     Browns #1, Steelers #2
    
    >>It will be highly satisfying when a central division team makes it to
    >>the super bowl this year.
    
    I'm going to frame this, Groaner admitting he'll root fer the STEELERS
    this year in the SUPER BOWL.
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.1236WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountMon Dec 05 1994 18:344
    
    
    
         Bandwagon Jumper!!!!!!!
61.1237PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Dec 05 1994 18:423
  Groaner's a closet Steeler fan.

	Keith
61.1238ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 05 1994 18:486
61.1239you should be ashamedFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Dec 05 1994 19:152
    After .1234, you just withdrew your right to call or accuse ANYONE of
    being a bandwagon jumper.
61.1240SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensMon Dec 05 1994 23:153
		    -< Just say no to KING Hal >-
    
Ain't hard to do if he isn't man (or dawg) enough to show up.
61.1241MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Dec 06 1994 02:564
    Hal Watch - dawning of Day 2.
    
    The Crazy Met
    al 
61.1242MKFSA::LONGTue Dec 06 1994 13:295
    I sure hope the local drug stores stock up on that heavy duty
    tape for yer ankles, Groaner.  Yer gonna need it.
    
    
    billl
61.1243PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceTue Dec 06 1994 19:275
    Oh where, oh where has our little HAL gone, oh where oh where cain he
    be????
    
    JaKe
    
61.1244ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 06 1994 19:284
61.1245FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 06 1994 19:301
    Has anyone ever seen Hal and Groaner together?  
61.1246ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 06 1994 19:302
61.1247PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceTue Dec 06 1994 19:4410
    
    >>Hal is at home, his PC is broken (excuse #19).
    
    
    Right, and the check's in the mail, too.
    
    HAL's doing his usual the 'Spots lose and he distappears trick.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1248FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 06 1994 19:481
    Groaner, you behave or I'm gonna sick Killer on you.
61.1249ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 06 1994 20:243
61.1250FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 06 1994 20:292
    Groaner, finally congrats for finally coming clean and admitting your
    the frontrunner instead of your usual petty reverse KOD mode.
61.1251PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Dec 06 1994 21:124
  OK, this Hal_Watch stuff has gome on long enuf. The King hasn't shown
  up in a long time. I say we strip him of his title and his crown.

	Keith
61.1252SQUEELERS WILL GO DOWN!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Dec 06 1994 22:0140
    
    Everyone has a bad day................you just have to.......
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    			BE YOUR OWN DAWG!
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    			GO CLEVELAND BROWNS
    
    			#1 TEAM IN THE AFC!
    
    
    			WHAT A "D"!
    
    
    
    
    		WOOF!	WOOF!	WOOF!
    
    
    
    
    	Yes that was a bad call in the game...that was a fumble!  Sala,
    Sala.....If the Browns hadn't lost the ball 5 FIVE times.....I would
    really gripe....BUT....This is the real life.....bad things happen man.
    
    
    		YOUR KING
    
    
61.1253PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceTue Dec 06 1994 22:458
    
    >>Sala.....If the Browns hadn't lost the ball 5 FIVE times.....I would
               ^^
    
    Yeah, and IF yer uncle had boobs you'd call him "Aunt".
    
    JaKe
    
61.1254ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 07 1994 02:396
61.1255SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Dec 07 1994 10:176
    
    Art had a big big team
    who's colors were brown and white
    and every team that played the Browns
    were scard as they could be
    and you could hear them ... cry
61.1256CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Wed Dec 07 1994 11:474
Hal, you'd better post the copyright permission to use the Be Your Own Dog
slogan. 

The folks at Plank Road would get mighty pissed at you otherwise....
61.1257WOOFSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Dec 07 1994 11:595
    
    	I said DAWG     .....     not DOG.
    
    Your King
    
61.1258CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendWed Dec 07 1994 12:154
>    	I said DAWG     .....     not DOG.
    
Concept, man, concept.....    

61.1259Give me BernieSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Dec 07 1994 15:0320
    
    	As the big game approches this Saturday, questions continue about
    Troy playing.  I hope he does because I don't want to hear on Monday
    that the only reason the DAWGS beat them is because of their QB.  I
    just don't think the Cowpokes are good enough this year.  With the
    Browns comming off the big loss against the Nts, I look for this team
    to go balistic.  The only question is can this team win with Vinnie
    as the QB???  Bill says he liked the way Vinnie played last week. 
    Funny though, I sort of got a chill every time the Browns offense went
    on the field.  Then to hear Bill say how good a job he did...???
    
    
    	I still would rather have ole Bernie Baby here.  I see he played
    the forth quarter last Monday.
    
    
    	Go Browns
    
    
    		WOOF!
61.1260but go the pointHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 07 1994 15:1016
>    	I still would rather have ole Bernie Baby here.  I see he played
>    the forth quarter last Monday.

Uh, Hal, Bernie, assuming you mean Bernie Kosar, can be found in Miami
where he indeed played on Monday night.

The current scrubs behind Aikman are Rodney Peete and Jason Garrett, he
of Turkey day fame.

As it stands right now, Aikman says that there's no way he doesn't srart
agin the Browns. I'd take that as a compliment, showing some concern for
Cleveland's ability.

Unfortunately for all the Brown faithful, Vinnie will start.

TTom
61.1261BIGQ::MCKAYWed Dec 07 1994 15:264
    This is how bad Vinnie's arm is.  His hail mary at the end of the game
    traveled a popwarneresqe 50 yards in the air!  
    
    Jimbo
61.1262ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsWed Dec 07 1994 15:289
    
> Unfortunately for all the Brown faithful, Vinnie will start.
    
    Unfortunate is all relative.  Vinnie, his long career as a starter
    being exhibit A in the case showing the dilution of talent in the 
    NFL, has still been better than Rypien this year.  Which may well
    be darning him with feint praise...
    
    Joe
61.1263either/orHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 07 1994 15:3110
re: Vinnie

Let me put this another way. The bad case scenarios for the Browns are
if'n Vinnie starts or If'n Rypien starts. Vinnie's never done it and
Rypien's days are behind him.

It's a shame cause the rest of the offense seems fine and the defense has
shown up quite often thised year.

TTom
61.1264and I hate the cowgirlsFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Dec 07 1994 16:136
    *I* could start at QB for the 'Boys and beat the SkidMarks.  Troy is no
    slouch, but you have to wonder what Jerry Jones is thinking about his
    big contract.  It seems as long as you have Emmitt, Michael, and Alvin,
    you can put anybody at QB.
    
    Mike
61.1265ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 07 1994 16:144
61.1266Irvin and Harper may not be around longHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 07 1994 16:2613
>    big contract.  It seems as long as you have Emmitt, Michael, and Alvin,
>    you can put anybody at QB.

One of the troubles brewing for the Cowboys is what to do with Michael
Irvin and Alvin Harper. I saw a_interview with Harper and he expects to
be gone. He's predicting that of the 2 he aint gonna get the big offer.

Michael Irvin, on the other hand, is playing a wait and see. He wants to
see exactly how big that contract will be. He's gonnna be in a bind cause
Jones is expected to make him "franchise" player which gives compensation
if'n someone else signs him.

TTom
61.1267Give me Mark but I want Bernie BabySUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Dec 07 1994 16:499
    
    I beg to differ reguarding Rypien vs Vinnie.  I honestly think Rypien
    is the better of the two.  I have to think that Marks INT rate is 
    lower.  At least he won't lose the game for you.  With the Browns
    offensive this year...its all short and the occasional long one.  I
    would just rather see Mark in there.  Anyone have the stats for these
    guys???
    
    WOOF!
61.1268BIGQ::MCKAYWed Dec 07 1994 16:543
    Can I throw it underhand?????
    
    8*)
61.1269ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsWed Dec 07 1994 17:1817
    
    Browns QB stats:
    
                           G    Att    Cmp    Pct    Yds  TDs  Int
    
    Vinny Testaverde      11    287    155   54.0   1979   12   14
    Mark Rypien            6    123     56   45.5    677    4    3
    
    You know, the perfect QB for the Browns right now would be Kosar.
    The Browns don't need a superstar at QB; just someone who can avoid
    interceptions and fumbles.  Oh well...
    
    BTW, Mike, I don't think you could QB Dallas past Cleveland, though
    I think Dallas is the clear favorite no matter whom among their QBs
    starts...
    
    Joe
61.1270SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensWed Dec 07 1994 17:225
    
    C'monJoe, stop trying to get Hal all urinated by saying Bernie isn't a
    superstar.
    
    brews
61.1271ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 07 1994 18:432
61.1272HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 07 1994 18:479
  
  The Henderson's (?) will all be there da da da da da da da da

  da da da da da assures us that da da da da 2nd to none.

  And of course, Henry the horse dances the waltz 2 3, 1 2 3, 1 2 3

  Or something like that,
  George
61.1273PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceWed Dec 07 1994 18:5245
    WHAT IS A BROWN?????????
    
    A BENGAL is a Tiger
    And a fast plane is a JET
    A COWBOY comes from Texas
    And a RAIDER is tough, I bet,
    
    A VIKING is from the frigid north
    SEAHAWKS live by the sea
    All are names of football teams
    Just like they ought to be,
    
    I don't know if it's true
    But I think I've heard a theory
    That Cleveland named it's football team
    After the color of Lake Erie,
    
    BROWN does not describe
    A big, strong athletic man
    It's what's inside the diaper
    of a baby STEELER fan,
    
    The guy who named this football team
    Must be a Cleveland Clown
    Who else would think to call
    A football warrior a BROWN
    
    If I'd been born in Cleveland
    And there my life was spent
    I'd find another team to cheer
    From pure embarassment,
    
    I, myself, have always loved
    The STEELERS "Black and Gold"
    i did when I was very young
    And will when I am old,
    
    Does the BROWN name come from BROWNIES
    The girl scouts we know of sorts
    Or is the name derived
    From the skidmarks in their shorts???
    
    Can anybody tell me
    WHAT THE HELL IS A BROWN???????????????/
    
61.1274SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Wed Dec 07 1994 19:331
    .1273 gets my NOTY vote.
61.1275NOTYPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFWed Dec 07 1994 19:385
  Another classic by Jake....

  I can hardly type, I'm laughin so hard.

	Keith
61.1276FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Dec 07 1994 19:501
    We need to put that to music too.
61.1277HAHAHAHAODIXIE::ZOGRANOne hand clappingWed Dec 07 1994 20:083
    All of my Pitts. relatives are gonna love .273.
    
    UMDan
61.1278OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATWed Dec 07 1994 20:382
    
    WAY TO GO JAKE
61.1280PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceWed Dec 07 1994 23:078
    I dunno who penned what I put in there, but I've loved it sonce the
    firsted time I read it.
    
    I cain't take the credit fer composing it, but I try and put it in
    the Brown(spot)s(tm) note from time to time.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1281METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Dec 08 1994 13:425
re: .1280

don't matter still qualifies as NOTY.

The Crazy Met
61.1282Better stop have drinks after 6pm!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Dec 08 1994 14:0835
    
    Hey!  You Fake..........You better watch it bud.....the Browns are
    comming to your town too and boy oh boy arn't you going to be eating
    lots of crow when they leave with 1st place in their pocket!  
    
    Lets see here....the Squeelers played Cinci last week and boy oh boy
    did their defense look good!!!  But I seem to remember a game against
    the Cowgirls where the defense looked like crap....could it be that 
    yes, the D looks good against 2-14 teams but when playing highly 
    rated teams.....the D is lost.  
    
    Another question.....can we get an update on the scheduel strenth of
    teams played against the Browns and Squeelers???  Would be interesting
    to see where we sit now.
    
    		THE COWGIRLS GO DOWN THIS WEEK
    
    			
    The Dawgs show they are still breathing and lock up a playoff spot
    while the squeelers lose to phili setting up the big game next week
    for 1st place and home field advantage.  
    
    	Jake the Fake will be walking around with cotton in his mouth 
    after the game from kicking himself and sucking on his toes.
    
    CLEVELAND, CLEVELAND, home that I love.....
    	
    
    
    
    
    	Why does the Squeelers where uniforms with yellow on them???
    
    
    		Could it be????  
61.1283OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATThu Dec 08 1994 14:526
    
    
    	So Hal are you up for a pname bet on the game Saturday? Don't
    ask for no stinkin points either.
    
    
61.1284and I hate da 'boysAD::HEATHCan the Pats duplilcate it???Thu Dec 08 1994 15:185
    
    
      I'd like a piece of that too Hal.  That is if your man enough.
    
    j/
61.1285ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 08 1994 15:355
61.1286ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsThu Dec 08 1994 15:5015
    
    From the Cleveland Sports Mailing List; sung to the tune of Jingle
    bells, it sums up most Browns' fans opinion of Testaverde...
    
    Scrambling with the ball
    Arms flailing in the air
    Defender in pursuit
    But Vinnie doesn't care
    
    The ball is knocked away
    The defense scoops it in
    Oh how much it sucks to watch
    Him blow another win
    
    Joe
61.1287Wasn't that Bernie's Tune TooSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOThu Dec 08 1994 16:009
I thought the Browns used the same tune for 
Kosar too, but with Bernie instead of Vinnie?

The Browns won't win it all to they get a 
starting QB with consonant as the last letter 
of his name instead of a vowel!  You read it 
here first!

zamboni
61.1288ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsThu Dec 08 1994 16:1416
    
>I thought the Browns used the same tune for 
>Kosar too, but with Bernie instead of Vinnie?
    
    No; Kosar was revered in Cleveland.  On top of that, he was a top
    notch quarterback once, something Vinnie can't claim.
    
>The Browns won't win it all to they get a 
>starting QB with consonant as the last letter 
>of his name instead of a vowel!  You read it 
>here first!
    
You read it here first - zamboni agrees with Hal that Mark Rypien should
start!
    
    Joe
61.1289FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Dec 08 1994 16:552
    yeah but the Bernie tune was about how he loved to wear Mrs. Santa
    Claus' clothes.
61.1290In the snow....SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Dec 08 1994 17:2621
    
    	Ahhhhhh, your just a wanabe!  Bernie was just unfortunate to not
    have a very good offensive line.  He still is one of the most accurate
    passers in the game!  Remember............holds the record for the most
    passes without an INT!
    
    	Back to the DAWGS......I see the Browns taking the last three games
    of this season, getting home field advantage and flying through the 
    playoffs to the superbowl.  Ernest Byner gets his chance in the Bowl
    and again.....he fumbles, but, this time it is recovered by a fellow
    Brown and the game is won!!!!!!  Yea!  I like it!  Can't wait to see it
    on TV!  Then, all you will see is people walking around with DAWG
    shirts on.  You will also see Jake, root for the DAWGS durring the
    playoffs because the Squeelers end up taking a dive and lose all three
    remaining games and get beat out of a playoff spot by the Raiders, KC
    and the Pats.   Come on, get on this bus!  We're going to have some
    fun!
    
    
    
    		WOOF!
61.1291Browns and Pats may end up with the same recordAD::HEATHCan the Pats duplilcate it???Thu Dec 08 1994 18:1613
    
    
    
      Now wait a minute Paul.....Going nowhere.  If I where a betting man
    I'd say the Pats win a superbowl long before those dopes from
    Cleveland.  The longrange outlook for the Pats is much brighter than
    that of the Browns.  Ask anyone but Hal and Joe.
    
    J/
    
    Although Joe is rational about such things
    
    
61.1292still no cajones!!OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATThu Dec 08 1994 18:255
    
    
    So   Hal are you taking me up on the pname bet or not.
    
    
61.1293PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceThu Dec 08 1994 18:4323
    >>Lets see here....the Squeelers played Cinci last week and boy oh boy
    >>did their defense look good!!!  But I seem to remember a game against
    >>the Cowgirls where the defense looked like crap....could it be that 
    >>yes, the D looks good against 2-14 teams but when playing highly 
    >>rated teams.....the D is lost.  
    
    HAL, you see the world thru fecal colored glasses.  The STEELERS had a
    rough start, going 2-2 over the firsted 4 games.  Since then, they have
    gone 9-1, and the defense has beaten the tar out of everyone they
    faced, and, in fact, won a couple of those games.  The only loss in
    there was to Arizona, and that came in OT partly because Charles
    Johnson forgot to hold onto the ball on the kickoff in OT, giving the
    Cards the ball in GREAT field position.
    
    BTW, if the STEELERS bow out of the playoffs early, which I doubt will
    happen, there is NO WAY I would root fer the freakin' 'Spots.  My
    favorite teams would be whoever is playing against the 'Spots.
    
    BTW, the STEELERS have clinched at least a wild card playoff berth, and
    are the only team in the AFC who have clinched a playoff spot so far.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1294ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsThu Dec 08 1994 19:0636
    
>    The longrange outlook for the Pats is much brighter than
>    that of the Browns.  Ask anyone but Hal and Joe.
    
    OK, so I wasn't asked, but I'm going to say something anyway...
    
    The only positions at which the Pats seem to be _currently_ superior
    to the Browns are QB (by a _big_ margain) and PK (barely - Stover
    has been quite respectable this year).
    
    Now, while the Browns run has relied upon some NFL-old types
    (like Pepper Johnson & Vincent), the core of the team is in their
    prime or younger.  Bill Belichek, despite the fact that he's perhaps
    the last person I'd want dating my daughter dating (if I had one),
    _has_ done a very good job in the draft (whether it's him, or a scout
    he's fond of doesn't matter).  After many years of awful picks
    (Mike Junkin anyone?), the Browns put together, under Belichek,
    a string of picks that has helped rebuild the team.
    
    The Pats, meanwhile, have been trying the same thing - but I'm not
    convinced that they've done as well (Bledsoe aside) as the Browns
    have.
    
    The Browns have one glaring hole - QB - and a number of places with
    room for improvement.  While finding a superstar QB isn't easy (and
    the free agent pool doesn't look very tempting), finding a QB better
    than Testaverde shouldn't be that difficult.
    
    The Pats (again, to my less-than-closely-following-eye) seem to have
    more holes to fill, even if none of the holes is as deep as Testaverde.
    
    BTW - the Pats are also clearly superior at TE.  There's probably
    another position, maybe two, but they aren't coming to mind right
    now.
    
    Joe
61.1295CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendFri Dec 09 1994 12:0914
|    	Back to the DAWGS......I see the Browns taking the last three games
|    of this season, getting home field advantage and flying through the 
|    playoffs to the superbowl.  Ernest Byner gets his chance in the Bowl
|    and again.....he fumbles, but, this time it is recovered by a fellow
|    Brown and the game is won!!!!!!  Yea!  I like it!  Can't wait to see it
|    on TV!  Then, all you will see is people walking around with DAWG
|    shirts on.  You will also see Jake, root for the DAWGS durring the
|    playoffs because the Squeelers end up taking a dive and lose all three
|    remaining games and get beat out of a playoff spot by the Raiders, KC
|    and the Pats.   Come on, get on this bus!  We're going to have some
|    fun!
    
    
Somebody better get this guy to pee in a cup.....
61.1296ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 09 1994 14:093
61.1297PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceFri Dec 09 1994 18:327
    Looks like that dose fo reality that the Giants gave the
    Brown(spot)s(tm) lasted Sunday served well to shut up the Groaner, or
    at least tone him down to little one liners he found in a Reader's
    Digest.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1298how's that for a one-liner?ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 09 1994 19:225
61.1299ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 09 1994 19:275
61.1300ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 09 1994 19:283
61.1301PTOS01::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceFri Dec 09 1994 22:2018
    
    >><<< Note 61.1298 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
    >>                    -< how's that for a one-liner? >-

    In an age of people who think at lightning like speed, yer brain is
    still caught up at 110 baud.
    
    
    >>Jake doesn't like the Browns because he can't fit in the seats at
    >>Cleveland stadium.
    
    Never been ther, never will be there.  The stench of the painted sewage
    sludge they call a playing surface is too offensive.
    
    JaKe
    

    
61.1302PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceSat Dec 10 1994 01:549
    
    >>Jake doesn't like the Browns because he can't fit in the seats at
    >>Cleveland stadium.
    
    Nah, Groaner, if the average Clevescum wimmen cain fit in the seats
    there, there'd be PLENTY of room fer my big posterior.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1303ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sat Dec 10 1994 19:4519
61.1304ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sat Dec 10 1994 20:2522
61.1305ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sat Dec 10 1994 20:395
61.1306ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 01:544
61.1307ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 01:544
61.1308ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 01:558
61.1309ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 01:563
61.1310ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 01:592
61.1311ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 02:024
61.1312ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 02:0315
61.1313ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 02:0418
61.1314ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 02:0516
61.1315ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 13:034
61.1316ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 13:043
61.1317ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 11 1994 21:346
61.1318Lip this, Wagon-jumper!MKFSA::LONGMon Dec 12 1994 00:3314
    First complete Browns game I've caught.  They looked good. (NOTE
    Groaner, I said good, not great.)  Some will say that the Cowboys 
    laid down for them since the team from Dallas was already in the 
    'offs.  
    
    Myself I think the Browns played OVER their heads while the Cowboys
    got caught unprepared.
    
    I guess from the last group of dribble Groaner now thinks the Browns
    are the best team in the NFL AGAIN!  Hope you got your tape ready for
    next Sunday!
    
    
    billl
61.1319MKFSA::LONGMon Dec 12 1994 00:355
    BTW, Groaner, I hope you and your pal Hal aren't going to try and
    weasel out of the Division Champ bet.
    
    
    billl
61.1320ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsMon Dec 12 1994 11:3513
    
    So, as everyone agreed it would, the AFC Central comes down to
    the Cleveland-Pittsburgh game in Pittsburgh.  (Sidenote - how often
    have we seen JaKe and Paul agree on something in SPORTS?)  Not only
    that, but since the other AFC teams seem to be working their way
    constantly to mediocrity, the Steelers and Browns appear to be the
    best two teams this year in the AFC, and the winner of the game clearly
    has the best chance to get to the Super Bowl.
    
    Should be a great game; given the respective offenses, I would almost
    expect a defensive or special teams score to make the difference.
    
    Joe
61.1321ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 12:1521
61.1322ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 12:1713
61.1323CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 12 1994 12:208
>    re: .1319
>    
>    Bet?  Wagering is against DEC policy.
>    

Then why were you running a big p-name bet, back around the time of
the Browns-Pats game?

61.1324Dallas win nice, but loss to Giants last week was the big oneEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Dec 12 1994 12:3114
          
>    If the Browns win next week, both teams are 11-4, they would be 1-1
>    in head to head and have the same division record.  The next tie
>    breaker is the conference record and the Steelers would have 2 losses
>    compared to Cleveland's 3.
 
    True enough.  As impressive as Cleveland's win over Dallas might have 
    been, with the Steelers' victory over Philly it became meaningless to
    the AFC Central title picture.  The Browns could have lost and they'd 
    still have needed the same as they do now: a win over the Steelers and
    Seattle, and a Steeler loss to San Diego.
    
    glenn
    
61.1325PTOS01::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 12 1994 12:4018
    
    >>Dawgs 19-14.  Frankly, if the Browns weren't looking past this game to
    >>the Steelers game, they might have really put the hurt on the Cowboys.
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
    
    Funniest note I've EVER seen from you, Groaner.  THe 'SPots played as
    over their haids as they ever have, that coupled with Aikman trying to
    shake the rust out after missing two games, and Novacek losing his
    footing and falling 3 inches short(just like you do Groaner) gave the
    'Spots a win.
    
    The STEELERS win the AFC Central and homefield with one victory, in
    either game, in the remaining two games.
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.1326ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 12:514
61.1327PTOS01::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 12 1994 12:5514
    I love how yer tune changes to suit whatever you have to do to feel in
    control.
    
    My prediction fer nexted week,
    	
    		STEELERS				17
    		Heathen_Scumbags_From_Clevescum		6
    
    
    Ya heerd it here firsted.
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.1328MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Dec 12 1994 12:5216
>    This could set up a strange scenario where as the Browns could end up
>    at 12-4, the Steelers at 12-4.  The Browns would have the second best
>    record in the AFC and would get home field until they meet the Steelers
>    in the AFC Championship.  THis assumes a Browns win next week and that 
>    the Steelers don't choke the following week against SD.

     Nope.  This would give Cleveland a first-round home game as the best
     wild card team, with a week off for Pittsburgh as the best overall.
     The following week, Cleveland would be on the road against one of the
     two division winners with a first-round bye (assuming the Browns would
     win the wild card game), very possibly against Pittsburgh depending on
     the result of the other first-round playoff game).  Cleveland CANNOT
     host a second round game if they fail to win the division; no wild card
     team can host a division winner in the playoffs (unless they host the
     Super Bowl and happen to make it that far).
     
61.1329why bother?MKFSA::LONGMon Dec 12 1994 13:0613
    re .1322:
    
    Nice technique there, Groaner, when you can't think of anything
    intelligent to add you try the personnal attack.
    
    I guess that's what I get for paying a compliment to the Browns.
    
    re bet:
    
    If I'm not mistaken you are the origiantor of the friendly wager.
    
    
    billl
61.1330PTOS01::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 12 1994 13:1518
    
    >>re bet:
    
    >>If I'm not mistaken you are the origiantor of the friendly wager.
    
    billl,
    
    what you fail to see so far is that now that the cards are against him,
    Groaner is wimping out, ya see, the STEELERS only have to win 1 of
    their remaing 2 games to win the division, while the 'Spots have to win
    both, and with them playing the STEELERS nexted week,their chances of
    winning 2 games is slim and none.
    
    I'm trying to talk him into a p-name on Sunday's game, but he's doing
    the ol Texass two-step around the subject, as usual.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1331PTOS01::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 12 1994 13:1715
    
    <<< Note 61.1322 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

    
    >>I never said the Browns were the best team in the NFL.  Like I said,
    >>long on lip, short on brains. 
    
    Ya know, Groaner, a better description of you I've never heerd, and you
    described YERSELF this way.
    
    Thanks
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.1332ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 13:198
61.1333ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 13:206
61.1334FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Dec 12 1994 15:172
    Groaner, welcome to SPORTS in December!  We haven't seen you here this
    late in years.
61.1335WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountMon Dec 12 1994 15:248
    
    
         If Pitt wins the #1 team in the AFC. And if Clevland makes it past
    the first rd of the playoffs and are rated the worst team record
    wise/Non division winner. Pitt plays them. I believe this was the
    format last year?
    
    Chap
61.1336ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 16:247
61.1337ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 16:282
61.1338But the Raiders will win the AFCWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountMon Dec 12 1994 16:3923
    
    
        Lets say for arguments sake!!
    
    
       Pitt  12-4  Ranked #1
       MIA   11-5         #2
       SD    10-6         #3
       Cle   10-6         #4
       Rai   10-6         #5
       NE    10-6         #6
    
           NE  at  SD
           Rai at CLE
    Pitt vs  Lowest rated team  left.  So if Cle beats the RAI (doubt it) 
    and SD beats the Pats.
    
          Cle  at Pitt
          SD   at MIA
    
            Mia  at Pitt
       
            Pitt vs SF for the Ringsssss?????
61.1339ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 16:498
61.1340WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountMon Dec 12 1994 16:5512
    
    
        Groaner I pray we Cleveland faces the Raiders in the Playoffs
    cuz Mr Testaverde will learn Terry McDaniels name real well!!!
    
    
          Clevelands beats 1 good team all year and you can tell other
    teams they suck????
    
    
    
    Chap
61.1341SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Mon Dec 12 1994 17:166
    
    	Cleveland/Pittsburgh will be seeded #1 and #4. There is NO WAY
    they can meet in the AFC Championship game. They will meet in
    round 2, if the #4 team doesn't choke against ?
    
    Ron
61.1342It's possibleBSS::MENDEZMon Dec 12 1994 17:354
    assuming that Pittsburgh is seeded 1 and cleveland 4; It is quite
    possible that Cleveland and Pittsburgh could meet in AFC
    chammpionship...
    
61.1343SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensMon Dec 12 1994 17:435
    
    And they will be seeded that high because they play in the worst
    division in the NFL.
    
    brews
61.1344WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountMon Dec 12 1994 17:467
    
    
          You are definitely right in Cleveland's case!!
    
    
    
    Chap
61.1345MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Dec 12 1994 17:4739
>    	Cleveland/Pittsburgh will be seeded #1 and #4. There is NO WAY
>    they can meet in the AFC Championship game. They will meet in
>    round 2, if the #4 team doesn't choke against ?

     This is just as wrong as saying they can't meet in the second round.

     Assuming the Steelers beat either Cleveland or San Diego, they will be the
     #1 seed in the AFC playoffs.  Cleveland will almost certainly be the top
     wild card team.  

     #1 Pittsburgh
     #2 AFC East or AFC West champ
     #3 AFC East or AFC West champ
     #4 Cleveland
     #5 AFC Wild Card #2
     #6 AFC Wild Card #3

     If the #3 seed (a division winner) wins their first round game, and
     Cleveland wins it first round game, Cleveland would play at Pittsburgh in
     the second round (Groaner is wrong, they can meet in the second round; the
     rules regarding this changed several years ago).  If the #3 seed loses to
     the #6 seed in the first round, Pittsburgh would host the #6 seed, while
     Cleveland (with a first-round win) would play at the #2 seed.  Pittsburgh
     and Cleveland second-round wins under this scenario would have them
     meet in the AFC championship game.

     At this point, it appears to me that it will be:
       #1 Pittsgurgh
       #2 Miami
       #3 L.A.Raiders or San Diego (probably San Diego)
       #4 CLeveland
       #5 L.A.Raiders or San Diego (probably L.A.Raiders)
       #6 next week's Buffalo/New England winner (probably, and sadly, Buffalo)

     The playoofs would then see (as an early guess)
        First round:  Buffalo over San Diego, and Cleveland over Los Angeles
        Second round: Buffalo over Pittsburgh, and Miami over Cleveland
        AFC Title:    Buffalo over Miami
        Super Bowl:   Buffalo over San Fransisco   :^)
61.1346FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Dec 12 1994 18:262
    Folks seem to be giving the Chargers a lot of credit in here.  I think
    they'll be lucky to get a wildcard, let alone the division title.
61.1347ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 12 1994 18:303
61.1348PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 12 1994 18:4522
    
    >> The playoofs would then see (as an early guess)
    >>    First round:  Buffalo over San Diego, and Cleveland over Los Angeles
    >>   Second round: Buffalo over Pittsburgh, and Miami over Cleveland
    >>     AFC Title:    Buffalo over Miami
    >>    Super Bowl:   Buffalo over San Fransisco   :^)

    HAHAHAHAHA, you sound like the HAL/Groaner of the Bills, now.
    
    The BILLS won't be around to embarrass the AFC this year, the STEELERS
    will bring the Lombardi Trophy back to the AFC this year.
    
    In the lasted 20 years, only 2 AFC teams have won SUper Bowls, the
    teams????
    
    
    
    The STEELERS and the Faiders.
    
    JaKE
    
    
61.1349TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 12 1994 18:4616
    
    
    	Things look pretty good for San Diego, even if they lose their last
    two games. They own all the tie breakers in their division, having gone
    6-2 (losses to LA & Denver). So either the Raiders or the Chiefs will
    have= to beat them outright for the division championship. And if they
    lose their last two games (Jets & Steelers) they will have a 7-5
    conference record. And of the other teams that could finish 9-7
    only Buffalo could beat that mark. Or if they finish in a two-way tie
    with New England, they would lose out due to head-to-head. 
    
    	Most likely there will be three or more teams tied at 9-7, and in
    that case the Chargers look OK...
    
    JimH
    
61.1350PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceMon Dec 12 1994 22:169
    Midnight is fast approaching fer Cinderella(Brown(spot)s(tm) and their
    cinderella season, and trying to win the AFC Central.  The only shoe
    they'll get is the 14EEE boot from the STEELERS Sunday, right in their
    wimpy little a$$es.
    
    Ya heerd it hear firsted
    
    JaKe
    
61.1351glad they're showing it here tooFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 13 1994 02:283
    Games like this in the past that saw the same hype over their defenses
    usually surprised people with the number of points scored (i.e., they
    never live up to their billing).  I say the Steelers win this one 28-21.
61.1352ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 10:142
61.1353Could Cleveland be the team to beat?SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Dec 13 1994 15:2036
    		     C L E V E L A N D   B R O W N S 		        
    
    			              ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                        SQUEELERS>>>/            
                            /\^^^^^^
                            \_______________

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Best game of the year thus far with the DAWGS giving the Cowgirls
    something to think about.  The Browns totally outplayed Dallas which
    the score did not indicate.  Have to give Bill some credit here with
    the great gameplan.  Also have to give Vinnie some credit too....at
    least he didn't lose the game for the DAWGS.  Give this man a raise...
    LEROY HOARD.....player of the game award.  Ole Leroy has done it with
    really no blocking either, as the Iceman stated earlier...no Vardell
    but a real loss was McKardell?? Wasn't that his name.....the TE the
    Browns lost for the year a month or so ago?  A great blocker is all I
    know.  Without these two guys, the Browns are looking good!  Imagine
    what this team would be like if both were back???...
    
    Game this week in the Rust belt....Pissturd Squeelers better look out!
    The Brownie Buggy is comming to your town just long enough to pick up
    the Central Division Tile and head to the warm climate...Miami!
    
    Honestly though....This should be the game of the centry for these two
    clubs.  I look for the Browns to dominate with the Squeelers making
    several costly errors as the Browns did in their first matchup.
    
    	Go Browns!
    
    		WOOF!
    
61.1354ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 17:053
61.1355total score <20 or >65MKFSA::LONGTue Dec 13 1994 18:238
    I really thnk it's going to come down to the team that makes the
    least offensive mistakes will win.  Both Defenses are very 
    opportunistic and will make the other team pay dearly for INTs and
    fumbles.
    
    
    billl
    
61.1356ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 19:525
61.1357PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceTue Dec 13 1994 20:2615
    
    >>I really thnk it's going to come down to the team that makes the
    >>least offensive mistakes will win.  Both Defenses are very 
    >>opportunistic and will make the other team pay dearly for INTs and
    >>fumbles.
    
    Well, the STEELERS are best in the NFL at NOT giving the ball away,
    with a league low 17 turnovers, couple that with the 28 takeaways, and
    they're at a healthy +11 giveaway/takeaway ratio.
    
    The STEELERS, for the most part, have not been beating themselves with
    mistakes this season, that's whay they're 11-3 now.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1358PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceTue Dec 13 1994 20:2816
    
    >><<< Note 61.1356 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

    
    >>Special Teams for the Browns get the slight edge over the Steelers...
    >>Metcalf and Baldwin are dangerous punt and kickoff returners.  Is
    >>Woodson 100%?
    
    SO, there's one are the 'Spots hold a slight edge in.
    
    I'll tell ya if Woodson's 100% when yer brain gets back to 100% after
    all the brain cramps you been obviously having, evidenced by your
    entries in here.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1359ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 21:096
61.1360PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceWed Dec 14 1994 01:267
    
    >>What is the Browns take away / give away data?
    
    With TesticleVerde at QB, it cain't be very good.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1361ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 11:102
61.1362ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 13:283
61.1363OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATWed Dec 14 1994 13:4319
    
    
    Cleveland   Give-take ratio is -3
    Pittsburg                      +11
    
    
    
    Here's a few stat for you guys
    
    
    Defense    league rank   season yadage weekly ave
      
    Cleveland     8              4249       303
    Pittsburg     1              3645       260
    
    Offense     
    
    Cleveland     21             4140       296
    Pittsburg     15             4426       316
61.1364ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 14:1118
61.1365WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountWed Dec 14 1994 14:307
    
    
       And #1 is where it really counts Groan_MAN
    
    
    
    chap
61.1366ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 14:379
61.1367WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountWed Dec 14 1994 14:418
    
    
         I just hope You and Hal are men enough to show up in here Monday
    morning, cuz if you can't see that Steeler team is better than
    Cleveland your living in NEVERNEVERland
    
    
    Chap
61.1368glass houses and stonesCNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldWed Dec 14 1994 14:434
 judging by your p-name there Chappy, perhaps you can book them a room......

 ;^)
61.1369WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MItReallyIs a Wonderful lifeWed Dec 14 1994 14:468
    
    
       Shad_up Mike    :-)
    
        I was just fumigating my P_name space after I lost that P_name bet.
    
    
    chap
61.1370 :^) CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldWed Dec 14 1994 14:480
61.1371HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 14 1994 15:206
  I'm going to go way out on a limb here and suggest that perhaps there is
a rivalry between the Steelers and the Browns.

  I don't know where I get that idea, just call it a gut feel'en.

  George
61.1372CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendWed Dec 14 1994 15:322
I think you might be right George.  I hadn't thought of it till you
mentioned it, but you could very well be right....
61.1373Good as it gets...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 14 1994 15:4514
    
    Pittsburgh-Cleveland II is the regular-season Game of the Year as far 
    as I'm concerned (even if Pittsburgh can still clinch the Central 
    later). Dallas-San Fran was billed as such based mostly on hype and the 
    overrated championship game homefield advantage but the meaning of that
    game will be long forgotten when those teams meet again.  There's no
    big rivalry there.  This is one of the biggest rivalries in sports with
    the participants holding the best two conference records for the first
    time in a long while (my brother is even driving up from DC for this 
    one and says he'll sit and watch in the Clark bar if necessary, which
    probably will be the case).
    
    glenn
    
61.1374ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 15:4511
61.1375ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 15:462
61.1376WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MItReallyIs a Wonderful lifeWed Dec 14 1994 15:514
    
    
    
         Raiders would Pummell the Spots!!
61.1377MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 14 1994 15:588
    re: .1375
    
    here is hoping for sub-zero temps and even worse wind chill.
    
    oh yeah, enjoy the game.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1378ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 15:592
61.1379Rivalry for a long long timePEAKS::WOESTEHOFFWed Dec 14 1994 16:0313
  I just love all this hype preceeding the Steeler/'Spot game.

  Ever since I wus 6 years old, this has been the big pro game of the 
  year for me.

  Clevescum and Pittsburgh are only about 90 miles apart and an easy drive
  via the turnpike. On one side of the state line, the only color that
  matters is Black n Gold, on the other it's Brown. This is an area of the
  country that has been very rich in football history. I just wish Buffalo
  was in the same division since they are also in the backyard of Clevescum
  and Pittsburgh.

	Keith
61.1380PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceWed Dec 14 1994 17:0712
    Actually, Keith, downtown Pittsburgh to the denter of the sludgepit
    they call Cleveland is about 125 miles, 2 hours on the 'pike if ya
    drive legal(which nobody does).
    
    The rivalry started off in 1950 and has seen 89 games so far.
    
    AND, when the wind is blowing from thenorthwest, we cain tell that
    CLevescum still exists by the stench in the air.
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.1381'Spots will get a whuppin on SundayPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFWed Dec 14 1994 17:378
  Since the Steeler's first suited up in the manly colors of Black n Gold 
  many, many years ago, they had a small rivalry with the New Yuck Giants 
  for about 3-4 years, a good rivalry with the Houston Oinklers for about 
  5 years, a great rivalry with the Oakland Raiders for most of a decade 
  and a non-stop, take no prisioners, we hate the 'Spots rivalry every year 
  since 1950.
	
	Keith
61.1382WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MItReallyIs a Wonderful lifeWed Dec 14 1994 18:1920
    
    
    
         Oh the 1970's!!!
    
              We were the best 2 teams of that decade the Raiders and the
    Steelers! It seems every year we would meet each other in the BIG GAME
    to decide who romped up on the NFC in the SB
    72  Pitt    13        7
    73  Oakland 33  Pitt 14
    74  Pitt    24       13
    75  Pitt    16       10
    76  Oak     24        7
    77 Denver beat us both
    
    
    Now that was a rivalry!!  unfortunately we lost more than we won!!!
    
    
    Chap
61.1383The bare truthPTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceWed Dec 14 1994 18:2331
    
    >>Stats, in order of importance:
    
    >>1. W-L record
    >>2. PF/PA
    >>3. Yds for/Yds against
    
    Groaner, if ya wanna talk "defense", the STEELERS have it on the 'SPots
    in each of the above catagories.
    
    as far as points go, and we're talking "Defense", the STEELERS have
    allowed less points than the Skidmarks.
    
    The STEELERS have, as a team, allowed 18 TD's, the 'SPots 19.
    
    The STEELER defense has allowed 15 touchdowns, and a total of 169
    points.  The 'Spots have allowed 19 td's and 178 points.
    
    the STEELERS, however, gave up one td via kickoff return, one via a
    fumble return, and one via an interception return, none of the laste 3
    counting against the "DEFENSE", persay.
    
    So, if you look strictly in terms of defense only, ya know, your
    defense on the field versus their offense, the STEELERS have better
    stats in all areas.
    
    Now, I await yer reply turning this all around, although I state FACT
    here, something you rarely, if ever, do.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1384MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 14 1994 19:086
    who would have thunk it JaKe and Groaner arguing about which of 'em
    uses facts in their arguments. I call it a drwa, neither of them is
    real good about that.
    
    The Crazy met
    
61.1385ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 19:2016
61.1386ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 19:202
61.1387MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 14 1994 20:2017
    
    re: . 1385
    
    1. Guess that qualifies Groaner as an Obnoxious Bulldawg - those are
    real ugly things and the best one can do for them is shoot 'em and put
    them out of their misery; hmm not such a bad idea.
    
    2. Oh and about that IQ bit, Obnoxious Bulldawg can't even figure out 
    where a Watch
    is appropriate I guess it puts the Obnoxious Bulldawg
    further down on the scale 
    then where he ranks me; po' po' Obnoxious Bulldawg - #1 begins to look
    even more like an errand of mercy.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
    
61.1388PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceWed Dec 14 1994 22:5210
    
    >>Jake, have the browns special teams or offense given up any TDs?
    
    Uh, WAKE UP PAUL!!!!!  We was talking "DEFENSE", remember, 
    
    
    Oh that's right, you HAVE to slant it in your favor.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1389ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 15 1994 00:477
61.1390ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 15 1994 00:496
61.1391PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceThu Dec 15 1994 00:5717
    
    >>Jake, read .1383.  You said the Steelers Defense gave up fewer than the
    >>total points scored against the team.  I'm asking you if the Browns
    >>offense or special teams gave up any points.  In .1383 you adjusted
    >>the Steelers D points and that's fine, I'm just trying to get the
    >>same data for the Browns.
    
    THe Brown(spot)s(tm) defense has given up ALL of their points.  While
    the 'Spots have scored 3 td's via
    returns/fumble/punt/interception/whatever, they have not given up any
    points via returns, so all of the points scored against the 'Spots have
    been scored against their defense.
    
    Unnerstand now???????????????????????????????????????????????
    
    JaKe
    
61.1392ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 15 1994 00:583
61.1393PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceThu Dec 15 1994 00:594
    No problemo.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1394MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Dec 15 1994 03:0011
    yo' Obnoxious Bulldawg 'ya gotta start finding some new lines; the lack
    of imagination and creativity on your part is clearly confirming your
    standing at the very depths of that IQ chart you seem to be sooooo
    fond of. In fact the notion that you are just looking for data is quite
    mind boggling; only real surprise here is that JaKe believed it, the
    Bulldawg's tendency to obfuscate is no surprise at all.
    
    JaKe wake up!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1395ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 16 1994 11:5315
61.1396ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsFri Dec 16 1994 12:085
    
    Perry?  No... Langham or Alexander or Everett or Stover or any number
    of players would have been better picks...
    
    Joe
61.1397PTOS01::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceFri Dec 16 1994 13:3797
Statistical Sacks

from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
12-16-1994


Pittsburgh Nickname:    City of Champions
Cleveland nickname:     Mistake by the Lake

Number of Steelers Super Bowl wins:     IV
Number of Browns Super Bowl appearances:There's no Roman Numeral for ZERO

Who the Steelers are named after: Steelworkers, the men who built America
Who the Browns are named after:  Paul Brown, the man who built the Cincinnati
                                 Bengals

Steelers' most famous play:     "The Immaculate Reception"
Browns most famous play:        "The Fumble"

Number of times the Pirates won the World Series:       5
Number of times the Indians won:                        2

President when Indians last won the World Series:  Harry Truman

College sports power in Pittsburgh:     Pitt
College sports power in Cleveland:  Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine

Number of major rivers in Pittsburgh:   3
Number that have caught fire:           0

Number of mayors' heads that have caught fire in Pittsburgh:    0                                             
Number in Cleveland:                                            1

Pittsburgh's most famous doctor:  Jonas Salk
Cleveland's most famous doctor:   Sam Sheppard

How Hollywood views Pittsburgh: "Flashdance"
How Hollywood views Cleveland:  "Howard the Duck"

Birds seen circling above Pittburgh every year: Peregrine falcons
Birds seen circling above Cleveland every year: Buzzards

Distance from Pittsburgh to CLeveland: 129 miles
Distance from CLeveland to Pittsburgh: light years

Number of rock fans who rolled down the backstop at Cleveland Stadium because
they "wanted to know what it felt like to be a baseball":  1

Reason Cleveland Republican Mayor Ralph "Fire Head" Perk gave for cancelling 
meeting with President Nixon:  wife's bowling night

Writers from Pittsburgh who wrote about Pittsburgh:  John Edgar Wideman, Annie
                                                     Dillard, August Wilson
Writers from Cleveland who wrote about CLeveland: joke writers on "Laugh In"

Greatest Cleveland-born stand-up comedians:  Arsenio Hall, Martin Mull, Howard
                                             Metzenbaum

Cleveland's number 1 export:  Paul Newman
Cleveland's number 1 import:  Lake-effect snow

Cleveland's greatest contribution to American Political Thought:  Phil Donahue
Cleveland's second-greatest contribution to American political thought:
                                President James Garfield

Age of Cleveland Plain Dealer's rock music reporter: 75
Age of Pittsburgh Post-Gazette's rock musci reporter: 29

Cleveland's three greatest rock groups:  Michael Stanley Band

City joke of Cleveland:  What's the difference between Cleveland and the
                         Titanic??
Answer:                  Cleveland has a better orchestra

Occupation of the person Pittsburgh was named after: Prime Minister of England
Occupation of the person Cleveland was named after: land surveyor

Important Cleveland/North Eastern Ohio inventions:
the messenger guard
the gas mask
public housing
the motorized spaghetti fork
the Rubber Bowl
flammable rivers

Important Pittsburgh/western Pennsylvania inventions:
nuclear power
cure for polio
electron microscope
movie theater
Mister Rogers
first newspaper west of the Allegheny Mountains





61.1398HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Dec 16 1994 13:5517
RE       <<< Note 61.1397 by PTOS01::JACOBR "Red Dust and Spanish Lace" >>>

>President when Indians last won the World Series:  Harry Truman

  For some reason they left out:

>President when Pirates last won the World Series:  Jimmy Carter

  They also neglected to mention:

  Inspiration for Indians team name: Famous Native American baseball player
    who played on 19th century NL Cleveland Blues.

  Inspiration for Pirates team name: Reputation of 19th century Pittsburgh
    Alleghenies for pirating players from other teams.

  George
61.1399toooo funny!MKFSA::LONGI miss Billy the kidFri Dec 16 1994 15:359
	If there's one this I miss not living in the 'burgh any more, 
	it's the city-wide chest thumping that goes on every year just
	before the Browns come to town.

	-.2 is a prime example.



	billl
61.1400Anti-Groaner SNARF!SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Dec 16 1994 15:371
zamboni
61.1401reminds me of the Colorado/Nebraska hypePEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Dec 16 1994 15:547
  Hey Jake, the article forgot one. Wasn't KDKA the first radio station in
  the USA ?

  Anyways, it obvious, the Dawgs have no chance when they play the Men 
  of Steel on Sunday.

	Keith
61.1402ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 16 1994 16:5672
61.1403BIGQ::MCKAYFri Dec 16 1994 17:258
    After carefully reviewing the stats, weather, and stars....IMJIMBO
    is taking the 3.5 and putting the garage on the Browns!  Bottom line
    Steelers defense has been too good lately.  As Vitale would say it's
    letdown city baby!  Visions of bowling in Hawaii will be dancing in
    their heads.  I think it's a 2 point game either way decided on a
    field goal with under 2 minutes left.......
    
    IMJIMBO
61.1404ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 16 1994 17:264
61.1405Dog DawgsHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 16 1994 17:295
re: 3.5

You gotta love the .5 part of this. Winning by a FG sounds good to me.

TTom
61.1406BIGQ::MCKAYFri Dec 16 1994 17:293
    You said five bucks, you double crossin son of a *&&&^$$%^
    
    Jimbo
61.1407ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 16 1994 17:344
61.1408HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Dec 16 1994 18:005
  So what time is this game on?

  Is it the same time as the Pats/Bills game?

  George
61.1409TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Dec 16 1994 18:017
    
    
    Browns/Steelers game is at 4 P.M. It was moved a couple
    of weeks ago to maximize viewer interest...
    
    JimH
    
61.1410ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 16 1994 18:143
61.1411TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Dec 16 1994 18:1613
    
    
    >Darn, I missed it in the paper today.  Is it scheduled to be televised
    >in Boston this weekend?
    
    
    	Yup, channel 4.... after the Bill/Pats game is over...
    
    JimH
    
    
    
    
61.1412ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 16 1994 18:255
61.1413CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Dec 16 1994 18:327
    
|    Yahoo... its more fun to have people over and watch it at home than
|    travelling 50 miles to some bar... although it can be interesting
|    watching a game with 50 other Browns fanatics.

What time should we show up?  What are you serving?  Cocktail shrimp are
always good.
61.1414PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceFri Dec 16 1994 18:3612
    The bottom line Groaner, whether you just use stats that make the
    'Spots look good or not is, the STEELERS are 11-3, and the 'Spots are
    10-4, and whilst the 'spots MUST win both remaining games to win the
    division, the STEELERS only have to go 1-1 to take the division AND
    homefield throughout the playoffs.
    
    And, if you talk SCORING DEFENSE, and you mean points allowed by the
    defense, yer off base, cause I already proved that the STEELERS DEFENSE
    has given up 9 less pernts than that of the 'Spots.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1415PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceFri Dec 16 1994 18:379
    
    >>travelling 50 miles to some bar... although it can be interesting
    >>watching a game with 50 other Browns fanatics.
    
    Outside of Clevescum, there's only 13 'Spots fanatics worldwide, and
    all have been certified brain-daid.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1416B^)ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsFri Dec 16 1994 18:4323
    
>    Outside of Cleveland, there's only 13 Browns fanatics worldwide, and
>    all have been certified brain-daid.
    
    JaKe, I hate to tell you, but there's more than 13...
    
    (I mean, if there were only 13, wouldn't it be an awfully big
     coincidence that 3 of them work for DEC in Hudson, MA?)
    
    (Oh, yeah, almost forgot - you know, maybe that's why DEC's had
     so much trouble; I mean, with Paul, Hal, and I all certified
     brain-daid (which I will assume holds some positive relation
     to brain dead), and we all work in HLO, maybe we're the ones
     bogging things down.  EV5 sure has been a drain on the corporation,
     hasn't it?)
    
    Actually, the Browns have one of the biggest (the biggest?) fan
    organizations of any NFL team; there are Browns Backer groups
    all over the place (including a number of foreign-type places).
    I can probably find an address for the Pittsburgh area group,
    if you'd really like...
    
    Joe
61.1417FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Dec 16 1994 18:472
    Joe's right.  They even have control over one of the local sports bars
    on Sunday's for SkidMark games.
61.1418PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceFri Dec 16 1994 19:044
    Them's just other brain-daids lead by the certified brain-daid.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1419I wanna see the game, but maybe not in BostonSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Dec 16 1994 19:239
But didn't Bob Lobel say once upon a time that WBZ couldn't
show a 4:00 game if the Pats played at 1:00?  I thought it was 
some kind of inane NFL rule.

The game is on the national docket for NBC this weekend at
4:00.  I'm actually looking forward to it.  With those two
D's, it ought to be a head knocker.  

zamboni
61.1420Has a Holy Cross connection somehow tooAKOCOA::BREENCome Monday...Fri Dec 16 1994 19:255
    Was that ancient Indian Sockelexis?  Joe Dugan used to talk about him
    all the time.  Apparently he was like a legendary  version of Jim
    Thorpe although he did actual exist and play.
    
    I'm surprised Ken Burns didn't mention him.
61.1421TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Dec 16 1994 19:4014
    
    
>But didn't Bob Lobel say once upon a time that WBZ couldn't
>show a 4:00 game if the Pats played at 1:00?  I thought it was 
>some kind of inane NFL rule.
    
    	Yes, when the Pats are at home and the game is shown on local TV,
    channel 4 cannot show the other NBC game. When the Pats are on the road
    (as the are this week in Buffalo) they can show the 2nd game.
    
    JimH
    
    
    
61.1422football at its best...be there...this Sunday!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Dec 16 1994 21:0735
    
    Boy am I sick of reading Jakes notes in here.....what a bunch of bull.
    Cleveland may not be one of the greatest cities around but they do
    have 
    		ONE HELL OF A FOOTBALL TEAM!  and I don't care what
    kind of stats you want to pull out of your A$$ either.  Over the 
    history of the Browns, you will see that their stats are quite
    good and much better than most teams in the NFL.  Pissturd has just
    been one of those pains you just can't get rid of.  And, to be honest,
    one of the teams I look forward to having the Browns play every year.
    
    	Everyone knows its just football and I would never hurt a Squeeler
    fan but this is just great.  This game is great.  I was walking into
    work the other day...with my Browns jacket on and as I walked by some
    guy comming out the door, he says to me as he walks by.....Steelers.
    I could just turn and Growl at him then we both smiled.....Other guys
    here at work, wearing Squeeler hats, we just continually bump into 
    eachother at every chance we get this week.  THIS IS FOOTBALL AT ITS
    BEST.
    
    	There is no way the Squeelers win this game this week.  You can
    bet Cleveland will go into the stadium this Sunday looking to kick some
    butt.  We still have something to prove.  We are getting more and more
    respect each and every week, but it will take this week to get it all.
    I've already heard many talk shows expecting Cleveland to go all the 
    way to the big game.  
    
    	I've just freshly painted my shoes too....can't wait!
    
    	Go CLEVELAND!
    
    		YA GOTA LOVE THOSE DAWGS!!!
    
    
    WOOF!
61.1423PTOS01::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceFri Dec 16 1994 21:2016
    Ain't it a shame how you, HAL, will probably be absent from this
    notesfile Monday after the 'Spots go down in the 'Burgh????
    
    
    All the notes are about over now concerning the hype up on this game,
    now it's waiting fer Monday and Groaner to show up with his "adjusted"
    p-name, after the Spots lose.
    
    Let the game begin!!!!!!
    
    GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!
    
    Clevescum sucks!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.1424ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Dec 18 1994 14:148
61.1425MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleSun Dec 18 1994 22:127
    Kudos to ObnoxiousDawg(tm) for getting in so quickly;
    
    Can't wait for the Halnalysis(tm) that will prove that Clevescum won
    this game.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1426ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Sun Dec 18 1994 22:125
61.1427ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Sun Dec 18 1994 22:132
61.1428PTOS01::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Sun Dec 18 1994 22:217
    HALwatch.......Ground ZERO!!!!
    
    ZERO, that's the number of wins the 'Spots have against the STEELERS
    this year.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1429ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Sun Dec 18 1994 22:255
61.1430PTOS01::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Sun Dec 18 1994 22:3317
    >>Anyone know when the Browns-Steelers game is?  I thought it was this
    >>weekend, but obviously it was the CLOWNS-Steelers!
    
    Ya know, it was a typical STEELERS-Brown(spot)s(tm) matchup.  Low
    scoring, lotsa penalties.  BOth offenses shot themselves in the foot at
    times with dumb penalties, and the "taunting" penalty on Derrick
    Alexander hurt the 'Spots REAL bad.
    
    The STEELERS finished the game with 298 yds offense, and would've had
    300 if the O'Donnell hadn't knelt with the ball at the end.
    
    Foster finished with 106 yds on 32 carries.
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
61.1431re: minute watch - credit where credit is dueMSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleSun Dec 18 1994 23:328
    hohoho; from someone who put a watch on JaKe at 9AM, from someone who
    complained oh so bitterly about having a watch put on wheh he wasn't
    around and then goes ahead and puts on a watch on someone else who is
    travelling. ObnoxiousDawg's predictibality is quite tiresome. No real
    challenge left; ah well have to find another one.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1432ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsMon Dec 19 1994 01:078
    
    Yuck.
    
    The Steelers caught the Browns' defense offguard in the first quarter;
    after that, the Browns played better than the Steelers, but made too
    many mistakes for it too matter.
    
    Joe
61.1433Hey, we're in the playoffs....SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Dec 19 1994 10:2714
    
    	Another gift to the Squeelers.....
    
    
    		Please Santa, bring us a *real* quarterback!
    
    	Name of the game......turnovers.
    
    		The third ones will be a charm.
    
    
    GRRRRRRRRRR!
    
    
61.1434PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Mon Dec 19 1994 10:5816
    If Bernice had been playing yesterday, the 'spots woulda had a chance,
    not to mention the latest in dress fashions.
    
    Vinny still hasn't recovered from the Penn State game.
    
    He had a receiver so open the guy was leafing thru Parade magazine, and
    Woodson had bit on a play fake and was the closest to the receiver, and
    was 12 yards away when Vinny released the wounded duck, and Woodson had
    enuf time to recover and knock the ball away.
    
    Says it all.
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
61.1435ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Mon Dec 19 1994 11:139
61.1436must be because the Steelers played and easier schedule :-)ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Mon Dec 19 1994 11:142
61.1437PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Mon Dec 19 1994 12:157
    STEELERS had one, but good pressure all day long.
    
    'Spots had two, one by M.D.Perry, but the other was, waht, a team
    sack???
    
    JaKe
    
61.1438ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsMon Dec 19 1994 12:218
    
>    STEELERS had one, but good pressure all day long.
    
    I don't know - it seemed that Vinny had a _lot_ of time to throw.
    There were instances of good pressure, but overall I think the
    Browns OL did an excellent job...
    
    Joe
61.1439CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 19 1994 12:243
I've only seen the Browns once this year, but I do think they need 
a better QB than Testaverde.  I think Belichick made a big mistake getting
rid of Kosar for Testaverde.  Bad move.
61.1440PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Dec 19 1994 12:256
    Good one, Metz....(Vinnie hasn't recoverd from the PSU game)...too
    funny.
    
    Just goes to show that he Browns *still* can't win a MUST game.
    
    Mark.
61.1441ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 19 1994 12:3311
61.1442CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 19 1994 12:5714
>    ... and Mark, don't get too excited about the Pats... they still are
>    not guarenteed a spot in the playoffs.

I'm not a Pats fan, but I would think that any Pats fan WOULD be excited
this season because of what the team did versus expectations.

I don't know of anyone who figured the team would win more than 6 wins.
I didn't think they would -- I figured they'd have one more "rebuilding"
season before they really began to compete, and quite honestly I figured
them in last place or 4th place in that division at this point in the season.

I would think any Pats fan would be more than pleased and quite excited
about their prospects this season......

61.1443ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Mon Dec 19 1994 13:003
61.1444CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendMon Dec 19 1994 13:1511
>    
>    Um... what about the Browns team versus expectations.  Predictions were
>    for 3rd place in the Central with a .500 record.
>

What about 'em.  I was talking about the Pats.  I had no idea what
the Browns were expected to do because I don't pay that much attention
to them, or that division, actually.

I have an interest in what the Pats do mainly because of Parcells (first)
and georgraphy (close second).....
61.1445ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Mon Dec 19 1994 13:224
61.1446The Browns are #2...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Dec 19 1994 13:242
Yep, Groaner, the Browns exceeded some peole's expections.  They are
clearly the second best team in the AFC Central.
61.1447TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 19 1994 13:3924
    
    
    >Gee, sorry for bringing up the Browns in the Browns note.  I'll go over
    >to the Pats note and ask the same question... :-)
    
    
    	Well Groaner, you were the one who brought up the Pats, and the
    fact that they have yet to clinch a playoff spot, in the Browns Note.
    
    	Somehow that fact makes you feel a little better in the wake of
    the Browns loss to the Steelers yesterday. I don't understand why, nor
    do I care. Just don't whine about somebody else talking about the Pats
    here after you first brought it up.
    
    	And if the Pats don't make the playoffs, yes I'll be disappointed.
    Simply because they have come so close (to within about 2 feet of the 
    right crossbar in Seattle lasted night, to be exact). But looking back
    over this season, I'm extrememly pleased with what they've done this
    year. Nexted year expections will be higher.
    
    JimH (who is hoping for a Browns/Pats rematch in the playoffs....)
    
    
    
61.1448Steelers D >>> Browns OHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Dec 19 1994 13:4016
Turnovers hurt, sure.

But the difference in this game was the Steelers invitation to Vinny to
beat them passing. The game plan for the Steelers' D was to force as much
pressure as possible with just 4 guys. Normally, they've been rushing 5
and emphasizing severe pressure on the QB. 

Against the Browns, they conceded some time to Vinny but had another
man for pass coverage. The Browns failed to capitalize on this with the
exception of the lone TD. Hoard provided little relief on the ground
game.

In short, the Cleveland offense didn't get it done while their vaunted D
yielded more than the team could get away with, at least yesterday.

TTom
61.1449TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 19 1994 14:0011
    
    
    	A serious question for the Browns' fans:
    
    		What do you guys think of Leroy Hoard? I've only seen
    the Browns 3 or 4 times this year. But every game I've seen Leroy has
    cough up the ball in big situations. Does this guy have a serious case
    of fumble-itis????
    
    JimH
    
61.1450ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Mon Dec 19 1994 14:106
61.1451CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Dec 19 1994 14:144
|    Yes, the Browns are the second best team in the AFC Central.  Funny

Hate to give you something to woof about, but right now I also think they
are the second best team in the AFC...
61.1452CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 19 1994 14:155
 yeah but on the front cover of the book with many pages is Vinny's picture
 so you may as well burn the book now.............

 mike
61.1453ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Mon Dec 19 1994 14:1717
61.1454ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Mon Dec 19 1994 14:194
61.1455ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Mon Dec 19 1994 14:203
61.1456CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 19 1994 14:284
 hopefully both but only one has a real shot at the Big One.......

 mike
61.1457I love the Steeler's tooPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Dec 19 1994 14:4010
>"I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!" 

  This is a truely great P-Name for Groaner.

  After one quarter, it looked like it could get real ugly and a possible
  blowout. The Browns did a good job of gettin back into the game and
  making it entertaining. They played good but not good enuf. The turnovers 
  were the difference in the game.
  
	Keith
61.1458Give me the credit fer a good one, will yaPTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Mon Dec 19 1994 14:5115
    
    >> <<< Note 61.1440 by PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing" >>>

    >>Good one, Metz....(Vinnie hasn't recoverd from the PSU game)...too
    >>funny.
    
    Hey Lufay,
    
    you bust my ass when I come up with what you consider "sick" jokes, but
    I come up with a good line, and you give the credit to somebody else.
    
    go check .1434 and you'll see the name on that one is JaKe, not Metz.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1459MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Mon Dec 19 1994 18:449
    Who would the Browns fans rather see them facing in their firsted 
    playoff game? 
    
    For personal reasons, this Steeler fan would like to see them face
    the Pats.  I think the Pats match up nicely and would give them
    a real run for their money.
    
    
    billl
61.1460ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Mon Dec 19 1994 19:016
61.1461HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Dec 19 1994 19:096
  Not likely. If the Browns play the Pats, the Browns will get crushed
like bugs.

  It won't be pretty.

  George
61.1462SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Dec 19 1994 19:207
    
    1st game doesn't make a difference becasue the Browns will be the host.
    
    The Browns will with the 1st no mater who they play.
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1463You might want the Raiders but not in LA...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Dec 19 1994 19:3510
>    1st game doesn't make a difference becasue the Browns will be the host.
    
    Not if the Browns lose next week, and the Raiders win, as I understand
    it (Raiders would hold common opponents tie-breaker).  As we saw from
    last night, the Browns probably can't afford to rest all their players
    and not take the Seattle game seriously...
    
    glenn
    
61.1464PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Dec 19 1994 20:051
    Jake, mea culpa!
61.1465PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Tue Dec 20 1994 11:0210
    Friday night I was listening to some bozo on a sports talk show from
    CLevescum, 1220 AM Jeff something or other.
    
    The guy was spouting off on how the 'Spots was going to beat the snot
    out of the STEELERS.  Lasted night, I tuned in to the same guy and he
    was taking some REAL healthy plates of CROW all night long.  Pretty
    funny to hear a Clevescumite taking his crow like a main.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1466MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Dec 20 1994 11:359
    re: .1465
    
    JaKester, I gotta tell 'ya that I have been totally surprised by the
    Clevescumites in this notesfile who bellied up to the bar and took
    their licks within a day of the loss to the Steelers. Definitely
    different from what past history led us all to expect.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1467FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 20 1994 14:354
    Lots of firsts for them this year:
    
    1. Still participating in here in December.
    2. Being here to take their crow.
61.1468PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Dec 20 1994 14:554
  Yep, the way things are goin, we'll have to make Groaner an honorary
  member of the Black n Gold fan club.

	Keith
61.1469PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Tue Dec 20 1994 15:459
    
  >>Yep, the way things are goin, we'll have to make Groaner an honorary
  >>member of the Black n Gold fan club.
    
    Clevescum fans, to get in, have to post a $100,000 bond and promise
    NEVER to root fer the Mistakes  by the Lake again.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1470Credit where dueMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Dec 23 1994 18:428
Now, now, Steeler fans, you've gotta acknowledge that the Brown fans
have stood up and let you shoot at them.

I'm particularly impressed by Groaner, who has maintained his noting
rate, despite the fact that every single note displays a p-name that
must eat away his insides.  My hat's off to you, Paul.

Steve
61.1471Pats over the Browns....TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Dec 29 1994 19:2934
    
    
    	Wow! I can't beleive that nobody has posted in this note all week.
    I guess all the Browns fans are too skeared to log in from home while
    on vacation, and make a prediction on the Pats/Browns games. :-) :-)
    
    
    	Lest I be called a Pats Bandwagon jumper by Groaner et. al. nexted
    week. I'll make a prediction on the game now. The Pats will win despite
    the predicted snowy weather. Look for Leroy (don't) Hoard (the ball) to
    cough up the pigskin several times. Bledsoe will throw mostly to the
    TE's  (Coates & Burke) and RB's (Thompson & Turner), using the short
    passing game to keep the offense moving against the Browns excellent 
    defense. The Pats defense will stuff the browns running game, and Vinny
    will lead the Browns down the road to ruin.
    
    	The Barking doggies in the End Zone section will go home with their
    tails between their legs!!!
    
    
    	And just to put my 'pname' where my mouth is. If the Browns win,
    I'll change my 'pname' to:
    
    	"Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl bound in 95"
    
    		For as long as the Browns are alive in the playoffs, or
    they win the SB.
    
    	Any of the 'spots fans main enough to do the same (New England
    Patriots - Super Bowl bound in 95) if the Pats win????
    
    JimH
    
    
61.1472PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Thu Dec 29 1994 21:545
    As of early this afternoon, there are still 5000 tickets unsold fer the
    game Sunday in Clevescum.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1473Pats double up DawgsAD::HEATHCan the Pats duplilcate it???Fri Dec 30 1994 11:4418
    
    
      re -.2
    
    
       All the Dawg fans in Hudson are on vacation but I too think they're
    all skeert to show up.  The dawgs won by a td last time and that was 
    without the Pats 2 best WR.  They are back and the D is playing much
    better than they did 8 weeks ago.  I don't care that MDP will be
    playing this week he will be a non-factor with the Pats short passing
    game in high gear.  Hoard will cough it up more than once one will be
    a costly one in the red zone.  Vinny Interceptiverde will throw about
    3 picks and this one will be over in 3 quarters.
    
    Jerry
    
    Pats  21
    Dawgs 10
61.1474MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Fri Dec 30 1994 11:4523
    >     <<< Note 61.0 by LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR "CaVs will win it all!" >>>
    >                     -< CLEVELAND BROWNS 'DAWGS' >-
    >
    >
    >	QUOTE FROM ART MODEL:  We have gone long enough...3 years...
    >
    >	The Browns will not miss the playoffs this year!
    >
    >	The Browns will win a division title within 3 years!
    >
    >	The Browns will get the home field advantage throughout the
    >playoffs within 3 years!
    >
    >
    >				OR
    >
    >	"I will sell the team and move out of town."
    
    
    	Looks like they got their work cut out for themselves next year!
    
    
    	billl
61.1475PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingFri Dec 30 1994 11:514
    I cain vouch that Groaner is out in Ohio.  My father is watching his
    place while he's gone.
    
    Mark.
61.1476DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake!Fri Dec 30 1994 13:596
    	Does this mean the game will not be on TV or will the league
    extend the blackout rule?  It would be ironic if Groaner couldn't
    watch the game while he was out there.  Course I guess he could
    buy a ticket.
    
    				   /Don
61.1477Very descriptivePEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Dec 30 1994 14:395
>Vinny Interceptiverde 

  This has a nice ring to it. Ya otta think about gettin a trademark.

	Keith
61.147830 years ago today, they won it all!TNPUBS::ALVEYPogue MahoneFri Dec 30 1994 16:2910
    Hey Jim,
    I'll take you up on that P_name bet, with the caveat
    that I'm really a fan of both teams and hence, bearing
    a Pats P_name would hardly be an embarrassment to me.
    
    The Browns' defense is gonna make Bledsoe look like
    a rookie.
    Browns march on despite Vinnie, 17-10.
    dr.a
    
61.1479MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Dec 30 1994 16:4611
    
    >> Does this mean the game will not be on TV or will the league
    >> extend the blackout rule? 
    
       The league *did* grant Cleveland a 72 hour extension on the
       blackout deadline but as of this morning there were 5,000 seats 
       still available. Obviously, Cleveland fans either aren't nearly 
       as rabid as we thought or they're expecting the Pats to beat the
       dog snot out of the Browns or both. Either way, you're right, Slash,
       it would be sweet irony if Groaner was out there and had to venture
       out into the elements to go to a sports bar to watch the game.
61.1480PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Fri Dec 30 1994 18:478
    I must say, however, that the seats that are still for sale in
    Clevescum Garbage Pit are absolutely lousy seats, miles from the sewage
    surface of the stadium and behind poles and stuff.
    
    the place should be condemned, and the football team with it.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1481ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Sat Dec 31 1994 06:3716
61.1482MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Jan 03 1995 01:054
    So did they show the game in Cleveland??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1483The Pats will be back though count on itAD::HEATHCan the Pats duplilcate it???Tue Jan 03 1995 10:138
    
    
      Congratulations to the Cleveland Browns.  They were without a doubt
    the best team on Sunday.  Executed their game plan very well and played
    a physical game up front.  Vinny didn't hurt them which was the key to
    keeping the score down.
    
    Jerry
61.1484ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 11:082
61.1485ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 11:124
61.1486ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 11:1828
61.1487It's even worse than you thinkMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRTue Jan 03 1995 11:5518
.1486:
 
>>  	>Team names- Us: Patriots.  Them: Browns.  What is a Brown?
>>  	>It's a color, that's what it is.  It must be an Ohio thing,
>>  	>naming teams after colors (Cincinnati Reds).  Browns.  Weak.
>>  	>Edge: Us.
>>  
>>  	If I'm not mistaken Red is a color as mentioned above... Boston
>>  	RED Sox...
>>  	^^^

Not only that:  the Reds' name is a contraction of the original
Cincinnati Red Stockings.  So the name is semantically identical
to Boston's.

But the Globe does have Peter Gammons.

Steve
61.1488TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Tue Jan 03 1995 13:0522
    
    
    
    	Here I am with my brand new Pname....
    
    
    	Congrats to the Browns, clearly a better team than the Patriots.
    
    	The Cleveland D played as I expected. Plenty of pressure on the QB.
    And excellent coverage down field. They took Coates away from Bledsoe,
    and then patiently waited for Drew to throw to him anyway... :-(
    
    	I also have to five Testaverde credit for playing a very good game.
    No mistakes, didn't force any passes. He did a nice job a scrambling
    away from the pressure whenever his pocket did breakdown.
    
    	Good luck in Pittsburgh. It should be a a great game. The Virtual
    AFC Championship game, IMHO....
    
    
    JimH
    
61.1489HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 13:5122
RE<<< Note 61.1488 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

>    	Congrats to the Browns, clearly a better team than the Patriots.
    
  I agree about the Congradulations part but I don't agree that the Browns
are clearly better than the Pats.

  In spite of the fine day by Testiverdi the Browns just squeaked it out. Had
this been a 31-10 type game then sure I'd agree that the Pats got their butt
kicked but as it was the Pats had the dogs sitting on white knuckles right down
to the end. 

  That onsides kick was one of the best I've ever seen. He slipped it behind
the line of Pat's players and just caught the corner and someone made a great
stop to keep it from going out of bonds.

  After that, one lucky catch and the game would have been tied.

  The Browns just got away with their hide in tack in what their fans are now
trying to tell us was a laugher. That was one close finish.

  George
61.1490ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 13:5719
61.1491ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 13:5740
61.1492ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 13:587
61.1493ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 13:5814
61.1494ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 13:588
61.1495ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 13:594
61.1496maybeHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 03 1995 14:005
My main main Leroy Hoard is still keepin on keepin on.

Let the predictions start anew: Cleveland wins at 3 Rivers!

TTom
61.1497ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 14:0114
61.1498Mark Rypien?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 03 1995 14:020
61.1499True jeen-yus prognosticating skills...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 03 1995 14:2114
>    I said it BEFORE the Steelers-Browns regular season game #2...  the
>    Steelers will not beat the Browns 3 times in one season...  Cleveland
>    will win this game.
    
    Good for you.  What a bold prediction, we'll win at least one game _if_
    we play three times.  Such confidence.  You also predicted that 
    somehow the Browns would win the AFC Central while not losing these 
    three straight to Pittsburgh, so if you're wrong again on this one I 
    expect we'll being seeing you in here next week talking more smack, 
    to yourself...
    
    glenn
    
61.1500confusedHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 03 1995 14:255
re: AFC Central

I thought the Steelers already won this?

TTom
61.1501I guess winner there takes allAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberTue Jan 03 1995 14:4210
    tom,
    	the outcome of miami-san diego and their token appearance in the
    afc championship game has been discounted by the same guy who makes it
    impossible for me to root for Cleveland the rest of the way as I've
    done in the past.
    
    	Of course looking at the Browns past post-season history my leaving
    them can't possibly hurt.
    
    billte
61.1502DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake!Tue Jan 03 1995 14:586
    	Hey Groaner, don't tell me you and the rest of the Browns fans
    are off the Kosar and on the Testeverde bandwagon?  Put Vinnie behind
    the Pats line and Drew behind the Cleveland line and the Brownies
    win 56-0.  The game was won in the trenches.
    
    				   /Don
61.1503ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 15:526
61.1504ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 15:534
61.1505SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Tue Jan 03 1995 15:579
    
    	Does anybody know if the seeding holds true for the AFC or NFC
    championship game? If Cleveland beats Pittsburgh, following the seeds.
    They would play at either SD or Miami for the AFC Championship. Which
    would be a big break for either SD or Miami. Since they won't have
    to play ANY playoff games in cold weather and would be the home team
    in the Championship game.
    
    Ron
61.1506Vinny has nightmares in Black n GoldPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Jan 03 1995 16:024
  Vinny Interceptiverde is still a very descriptive name when he plays
  against the AFC Central champion Pittsburgh Steelers.

	Keith
61.1507MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 03 1995 16:047
    >> They didn't win the AFC Central... oh well, they are still playing 
    >> and so is Pittsburgh, so not much harm was done.
    
       Nice try to put a positive spin on it, Groaner but Pittsburgh is 
       playing at home in the friendly confines of Three Rivers. I'd say
       that'd be enough harm to keep your streak of never going to the
       Super Bowl alive. Not that that streak was ever in jeopardy.
61.1508HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 16:0514
RE          <<< Note 61.1505 by SNAX::ERICKSON "Time for Vacation..." >>>
    
>    	Does anybody know if the seeding holds true for the AFC or NFC
>    championship game? 

  Yes it does.

>If Cleveland beats Pittsburgh, following the seeds.
>    They would play at either SD or Miami for the AFC Championship. 

  Yes, that still applies. But it's not likely. The Steelers should win easily
in which case the game will be in Pittsburgh.

  George
61.1509Divisional winner has homeHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 03 1995 16:0510
A wild card team cannot host a divisional or conference playoff game
unless it's opponent is a lowere seeded wild card. In other words, in
this example, SD and Miami won their divisions while Cleveland did not.
They get the home field nod.

NBA does it a little different. Winning the division only gets you home
court in the opening round. After that advancing teams are re-seeded by
record only. Don't matter if'n you won your division.

TTom
61.1510TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Tue Jan 03 1995 16:2311
    
    
    
       >>> Vinnie had the game of his life...
    
    		That was the game of his life????
    
    		Vinny needs a life....
    
    JimH
    
61.1511HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 16:264
  Hey, maybe they only scored 17 points, but those were BROWN points.

  What ever that means,
  George
61.1512Not that the Steelers are going to lose, but...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 03 1995 16:4014
    
>    Yo Glenn, I think winning this game is bigger than winning either of
>    the previous two.
    
    It's bigger only until both teams are eliminated from championship 
    consideration, or at least until one goes to the Super Bowl (just
    making it _is_ a worthy accomplishment).  If none of that happens then 
    it's just another big game that ultimately wasn't enough, where'd I'd 
    just as soon have taken the AFC Central for the bragging rights 
    (bragging rights that were oh-so-incredibly important to Dawg fans and
    Art Modell, until they lost them).
    
    glenn
      
61.1513ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsTue Jan 03 1995 17:277
    
>Yes, that still applies. But it's not likely. The Steelers should win easily
>in which case the game will be in Pittsburgh.
    
    Just like did a couple of weeks back, right?
    
    Joe
61.1514ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 18:2715
61.1515PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Tue Jan 03 1995 18:3212
    
    >>large offensive and defensive lines.  Hoard is a powerhouse.  The
                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Yep, them 38 yds on 13 carries against the STEELERS so far this year
    really have put a world of hurt on them, huh???
    
    
    NOT!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.1516maybeHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 03 1995 18:3313
>    Home Field Advantage goes to the Steelers.

You and Danny Sheridan agree (cf. The Line).

>    I personally think the Browns will win... I'm sure the Steelers fans
>    think the Steelers fans will win.  I'm sure the rest of the SPORTS
>    noters want the Steelers to win.

No doubt about the firsted. Probably for the seconded. Not so sure for
the lasted one. You're not trying to say that somehow SPROTSters may
have been turned off in some way, are you? ;-)

TTom
61.1517ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 18:374
61.1518what it's all aboutHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 03 1995 18:436
Hey, 90% of the fun of something like the Browns-Steelers game is the
pre-game bravado and post game gloating and eating of crow.

The other half has a lot to do with entertainment and trade stimuli.

TTom
61.1519HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 18:456
  I agree that bickering over this is half the fun. Actually I'm pretty much
50-50 on the Steelers and Browns. Either team would be fine to see in the
Conference Championship and either would deserve to be there if they won
next week.

  George
61.1520ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsTue Jan 03 1995 18:485
    
    Well, while I didn't expect the Browns to win the first Pittsburgh
    matchup, I honestly believe they will win this weekend...
    
    Joe
61.1521(8^)*PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Tue Jan 03 1995 18:509
    
    >>Well, while I didn't expect the Browns to win the first Pittsburgh
    >>matchup, I honestly believe they will win this weekend...
    
    Well, seeing the above statement, I guess you still believe in Santa
    Claus, the Toof Fairy, and pay raises at DEC, right???
    
    JaKe
    
61.1522DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake!Tue Jan 03 1995 18:508
    	Hey Groaner, you have one very big thing in your favor.  Jim
    Wardle is on the Steelers bandwagon and we know what happens when
    he starts rooting for a team.  The mail I've been receiving from
    him the last couple of weeks has been signed JoS(teelers).  I figure
    I'm in a no lose position about this game.  Browns win and Waddle
    eats crow, Steelers win and you eat crow...
    
    				   /Don
61.1523PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Tue Jan 03 1995 19:0719
    
    >> <<< Note 61.1522 by DZIGN::ROBICHAUD "CorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake!" >>>

    >>	Hey Groaner, you have one very big thing in your favor.  Jim
    >>Wardle is on the Steelers bandwagon and we know what happens when
    >>he starts rooting for a team.  The mail I've been receiving from
    >>him the last couple of weeks has been signed JoS(teelers).  I figure
    >>I'm in a no lose position about this game.  Browns win and Waddle
    >>eats crow, Steelers win and you eat crow...
    
    >>				   /Don

    Tell him that if he changes his "rooting" to the 'Spots, and then when
    the STEELERS win, I'll consider sending him a sixer of Iron City beer
    to drink or strip the paint offa his car or sumpthin.
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.1524ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsTue Jan 03 1995 19:247
    
>    Well, seeing the above statement, I guess you still believe in Santa
>    Claus, the Toof Fairy, and pay raises at DEC, right???
    
    Well, two of three...
    
    Joe
61.1525MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Tue Jan 03 1995 19:3010
    Where the Hail is Hal?!
    
    I go out and spend bouqueau bucks on a tribute to his KOH triumph and
    he's never around for me to present it to him.  I'm sure he'd want to 
    wear it this Saturday.
    
    When is the nexted git tagether anywho?
    
    
    billl
61.1526ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 19:463
61.1527THE YEAR OF THE DAWGSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jan 03 1995 20:3559
    
    	YES!!!YES!!!YES!!!
    	
    	The Browns totally dominated the game Sunday and you can bet they
    	will be looking for Squeeler meat this Saturday!
    
    	All I remember seeing when the Pats had the ball is # 90 of the
    	Browns IN HIS FACE the whole game.  The Browns showed that they
    	could score on the Pats anytime they wanted.  It was just a mater
    	of eating up the clock on most occasions.  
    
    	Vinnie is certainly the MAN OF THE DAY.  You just got to give him 
    	credit.  Looked like the Dallas game to me.  Great game plan!  Have
    	to give ole Bill some credit here too.  Only problem I saw was not
    	much of Metcalf in this game and maybe that was good too because
    	the one time he did get the ball...he fumbled.  Could be a trick
    	though.....will the Squeelers look for metcalf while the rest of
    	the Browns tear up the yardage.
    
    	The Browns go on and the Pats stay home!  The way it is, the way it
    	should be!  
    
    	Another thing I loved was those fake reverses....THEY WERE GREAT!!!
    	I can't believe no one would cover the fake.....YES.....HE IS WIDE
    	OPEN!
    
    		VINNIE BABY......ONE MORE TIME!!!
    
    			and he doesn't get butterflies!
    
    		THIS IS GREAT!!!
    
    	There seems to be so much to talk about in Cleveland right now...
    
    	lots of controversy.....you have Vinnie, you have Mr. Michael
    	Jackson!!!  YES SIR....LETS NOT FORGET THE MOONWALKER!  What a game
    	put in by him this weekend!  YES BABY YES!!!  and he was benched
    	last week against Seattle....not to mention the fights with Bill.
    	Then you have Bill being himself and he even gave his first post
    	game interview after the game.  You have Pepper Johnson.....great
    	guy and when he came in on the blitz.........Bledsoe Blew Blood!
    	HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.....I kill myself!!
    
    	Ya gota love the hype!  This game against the Pissturd Squeelers
    	(just like a pig) will be the best ever!  I really do think the 
    	Browns will win this game too.  You can sence the Browns are going
    	to win this game and from what I here from the Browns themselves...
    	they know they are going to win this game.  I really think the 
    	Browns want this game more than the Pigturd Squeelers!
    
    		CLEVELAND
    			CLEVELAND
    				CLEVELAND
    					CLEVELAND
    						CLEVELAND
    
    	WOOF!!!
    
    
61.1528PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Wed Jan 04 1995 01:1211
    
    
>>    	to win this game and from what I here from the Browns themselves...
>>    	they know they are going to win this game.  I really think the 
    
    I think the STEELERS will have something to say about that Saturday
    when they pound the hapless puppies into submission and send them back
    to Clevescum licking their wounds, among other thangs.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1529ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralWed Jan 04 1995 01:135
61.1530CARNAC LivesPTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Wed Jan 04 1995 03:168
    STEELRS will win  19-6.
    
    VInny Testicleverde will throw 2 or 3 int's, Hoard and Metcalf will
    both lose fumbles, and Foster and BAM Morris will run wild thru
    CLevescum's defense, with O'Donnell completing 14 of 20, with one TD.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1531Musta been watching Colorado/NDCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Wed Jan 04 1995 11:158
|  	The Browns totally dominated the game Sunday and you can bet they

Pssst HAL, it was a seven point game, with the Pats making
some key mistakes.  Nobody dominated anyone.

What game were you watching?

=Bob=
61.1532Looking to see the Browns at the DanceSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOWed Jan 04 1995 12:0719
>What game were you watching?
>
>=Bob=

He was wearing those Brown tinted glassed again while watching.
Everything is magnified by a power of 2 with those dang things.

FWIW.  Joe Theisman was on Leno lasted night.  He picked Cleveland 
and the 49ers to be at the dance this year.  

Personally, I think the game this weekend could go either 
way.  But I really think it will turn out to be the AFC 
championship game.  I think either team will run over the winner
of Miami/San Diego.

Personally I'm betting on a 3 point win by the Brownies, as
much as it pains me to say that!

zamboni
61.1533grassSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jan 05 1995 10:2315
    
    	One thing I have to say about the Playoffs this year is that many
    of the games just don't get me pumped....I really think alot has to do
    with the fields the games are played on.  When you see football being
    played on artificial turf and in domes instead of outside on real grass
    with the elements, I think it takes something from the game.  Last
    weeks Cleveland game *was* real football.  Then the late game just
    didn't give me the same warm fuzzy feeling.  
    	This brings me to Pigturd Sqeeler Stadium.  The Turds don't play on
    real grass...do they?  I remember thinking about this after the last
    Browns game there....When did they change to fake stuff?  
    	
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1534Must be close to 30 years now aint itAD::HEATHDawgs Rule Pats SipThu Jan 05 1995 10:245
    
    
     About the time 3 rivers stadium opened?
    
    jerry
61.1535SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jan 05 1995 10:497
    
    	Must be the water from those three rivers that makes it impossible
    to grow real grass there.....or.....maybe the Pigturd people just don't
    know how to grow grass like the rest of the nation.
    
    WOOF!
    
61.1536MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Jan 05 1995 11:108
>                   -< Must be close to 30 years now aint it >-
>
>    
>    
>     About the time 3 rivers stadium opened?
    
 	Must be 24.  When the Pirates won the NL East in 1970, they switched
	halfway through the season to Three Rivers Stadium.
61.1537MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Thu Jan 05 1995 12:368
    As much as it pains me to admit it, I have to agree with Hal (did 
    I say that?).  It pains me to see the Steelers playing on that 
    concrete floor they call artificial turf.
    
    I don't think they ever had real grass in 3Rivers.
    
    
    billl
61.1538MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Jan 05 1995 12:4417
>        <<< Note 61.1537 by MKFSA::LONG "Steelers...strivin' fer 5!" >>>
>
>    As much as it pains me to admit it, I have to agree with Hal (did 
>    I say that?).  It pains me to see the Steelers playing on that 
>    concrete floor they call artificial turf.
>    
>    I don't think they ever had real grass in 3Rivers.
>    
>    billl

     I remember the 1970 NLCS against Cincinnati, and it seems to me there
     was a play involving Dave Cash, artificial turf, and the 3-0 extra
     inning loss to the Reds (but that could have been at Riverfront).

     In any case, I'm sure that the 1970 NLCS was the first postseason series
     entirely on the rug.

61.1539ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralThu Jan 05 1995 14:099
61.1540MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Thu Jan 05 1995 16:0614
    How did the Browns ever get a sub-nickname like the Dawgs?
    
    Seriously.  Is is kinda like the Alabama Chrimson Tide adopting 
    the elephant and the Auburn Tigers also being called the War Eagles?
    
    I remember the Washington Redskins developing a Hog relationship 
    with their offensive line.  I just don't get the Dawg connection
    with the Browns.
    
    Could it have something to do with their long distance love affair
    with Marge Schott?
    
    
    billl
61.1541GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Thu Jan 05 1995 16:264
    
    	Auburn has a third nickname.  Plainsmen....
    
    Claybone
61.1542HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jan 05 1995 16:3110
RE        <<< Note 61.1540 by MKFSA::LONG "Steelers...strivin' fer 5!" >>>

>    How did the Browns ever get a sub-nickname like the Dawgs?
    
  At one point several years back someone started using the pop song "bad to
the bone" for the Browns. After that the dog thing seemed to catch on (dogs
eat bones I guess) and fans started dressing up as dogs, calling part of the
stadium the dog pound, etc. 

  George
61.1543Go to it, Steelers fansMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRThu Jan 05 1995 16:473
George has just handed you the straight line of the decade.

Steve
61.1544ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsThu Jan 05 1995 17:255
    
    If I remember correctly, it was Hanford Dixon who first applied
    the "Dawg" monicker to the Browns (well, to the defense in particular).
    
    Joe
61.1545JULIET::SHERRILROThu Jan 05 1995 19:183
    
    I think he was into dog breeding and it he barked on the field or
    sumpin like that.
61.1546SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jan 05 1995 20:336
    
    The orange shoes are comming out for this one........the Pigturd
    Squeelers will go down to the DAWGS!  
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1547IT WILL BE A DAWGS DAY AFTERNOON...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jan 05 1995 20:4517
                            C L E V E L A N D 

		                      ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                    Squeelers>>>>>>>/                \  | /
                            /\^^^^^^     >>>>>     -Pigsturd-
                            \_______________          / | \

                                D A W G S

    
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1548PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Thu Jan 05 1995 21:006
    I'll just love seeing HAL in here Monday with his tail between his
    legs, that is if he even shows up after the STEELERS beat the Clevescum
    Skidmarks.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1549SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jan 05 1995 21:2310
    
    	Hey Mr. Artificial......I don't work Mondays.......so, I won't be
    able to see your congrats note to the Browns till then....but, if you
    send me your home phone number I'll personnally give you a call if and
    thats a BIG   I F   the Pigsturd Squeelers happen to SSSqqqeeeekkk the
    game out.
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1550PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Thu Jan 05 1995 21:335
    I don't give out my home phone # to Clevescumites.  It makes fer some
    childish phone calls around the clock.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1551PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Fri Jan 06 1995 01:1420
What's the ONLY sign of LIFE in Clevescum?????
    
    

             _____________________________
	     |				 |
	     |		PITTSBURGH	 |
	     |				 |
	     |		152   MILES	 |
	     |				 |
	     |				 |
	     -----------------------------
			|  |
			|  |
			|  |
		       /    \
 		      /      \
      		     /\/\/\/\/\

							
61.1552ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralFri Jan 06 1995 02:0913
61.1553some info please...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jan 06 1995 10:1521
    
    I hope someone out there and post the folling requested information...
    	it should be kind of interesting...
    
    	In the years that the Pigturd Squeelers went to the Superbowl...
    		
    		1 - How many times did they play Cleveland?
    
    		2 - What was the score of those games?
    
    		3 - Who was the home team?
    
    		4 - What was the Browns season end record?
    
    		5 - Did the Browns make the playoffs in those years?
    
    Thanks...
    
    		WOOF!
    
    
61.1554SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jan 06 1995 10:2647
    
    	Just a note about special teams.....
    
    		In the game against the Pats last week, I would have to say
    	that the Pats won the special team battle.  I was not too happy
    	with the Browns special teams at all.  Hopefully, the Browns will
    	get their act together here.
    
    		What I remember about the game reguarding special team
    play....
    
    		1 - getting pinned back at their 2 yard line on a punt...
    
    		2 - fake punt worked for the Pats...
                    	(Someone has to cover the guy out of the
    			backfield!) (What did they think the guy was 
    			going to do when he started running toward the 
    			line instead of protecting the punter???)
    
    		3 - on-side-kick....
    			(Don't you think the Browns should have come up for
    			the ball or attacked it???)
    
    			What would have happened if the Browns recovered
    			the ball before it went 10 yards?
    
    			Stupid rule though....letting the Pats kick the	
    			ball a second time after going out of bounds on the
    			first try.  I would have thought the Browns would 
    			have just taken over the ball and declined any kind
    			of penalty.
    
    	Bottom line is you can bet the special team unit will be better
    this weekend.  I'd like to see the Browns start off at their 40...at
    least...when the game begins.  But, I will say this, the Browns have
    been able to come out of their own end on many occasions and not have
    to punt from the end zone this year.  Hoard has been able to pick up
    5 yards a pop in those situations.
    
    	Lets put them away early!
    	
    	Anyone hear of what pre game specials there are going to be this
    	weekend?
    
    	Go Browns!
    		WOOF!
    
61.1555Woulda, couda, shoulda, didn't matter.SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Jan 06 1995 11:488
>>  			What would have happened if the Browns recovered
>   			the ball before it went 10 yards?

	Woulda been the Browns ball.  Once the kicker kicks it, the receiving
team can get it anywhere on the field.  Only the kicking team is restricted
for the first 10 yards.

zamboni  
61.1556SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jan 06 1995 12:4810
    
    Ok, so, if the Browns had tried to get the ball but was interfered with
    by one of the Pats guys because the ball was kicked behind the kicking
    team....what would have happened?  I thought the reason you put all
    your "hands" players on the line was to get the ball...not to let it 
    bounce around...comeon Cleveland...lets not let this happen again...we
    may not be so lucky next time.
    
    WOOF!
    
61.1557onsides musingsMKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Fri Jan 06 1995 12:5513
    I was wondering kinda the same thing.  I'd never seen an onsides kick
    executed quite that way, with the ball kicked behind a group of players
    on the kicking team who are running into the players on the receiving
    team to keep the receivers from having a shot at the ball.
    
    I actually thought there would be a call against the Pats for running
    into a receiver before he had a chance at the ball.
    
    I will admit that I'm very hazy on the rules behind an onsides kick,
    other than the 10 yard ruling.
    
    
    billl
61.1558ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralFri Jan 06 1995 13:003
61.1559ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralFri Jan 06 1995 13:0817
61.1560ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralFri Jan 06 1995 13:093
61.1561Pats onside kick was clean all the way...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Jan 06 1995 13:2214
>    On the on-side kikc, the Browns should have called for a fair catch,
>    then it would have been a penalty.
    
    There's no fair catch on a bouncing kickoff.  If there were, and if it
    were required that the receiving team get a clean first shot at the
    ball, there'd really be no point to the onside kick rule (you'd only 
    be able to recover fumbles, just as with punts).  As long as the Pats 
    didn't bowl over a player without the ball to put him out of the play,
    there's no call.  And even then, in practice the officials usually let
    it go, as onsides kicks are free-for-alls...
    
    glenn
    
61.1562MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Fri Jan 06 1995 13:2315
    
>    Steelers won all 8 games, so what are you getting at Hal, Pittsburgh
>    is going to win and also win the Super Bowl because of this?
    
    JaKe, you better be careful that corporate security doesn't catch you
    in Hal's account.
    
    re onsides kick:
    
    Even if you don't call for a fair catch doesn't the kicking team have
    to stay a certain distance away from you to allow you to attempt to
    catch the ball?
    
    
    billl
61.1563EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Jan 06 1995 13:2511
    
>    Even if you don't call for a fair catch doesn't the kicking team have
>    to stay a certain distance away from you to allow you to attempt to
>    catch the ball?
    
    No.  After 10 yards, an onsides kick is a free ball.  It's as if it
    were a fumble at that point, with all interference, holding rules etc.
    still in effect...

    glenn
    
61.1564MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Fri Jan 06 1995 13:278
	>> As long as the Pats didn't bowl over a player without the ball 
    	>>to put him out of the play, there's no call.
    
    	But I thought that was exactly what did happen.  At least it looked
    that way to me.
    
    
    billl
61.1565SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jan 06 1995 13:346
    
    	I could have swarn that the Browns were like the only team that 
    	played the Squeelers tough durring their SB years....I guess those
    	OT games were the ones that stuck in my memory.....
    
    	GRRRRRRRRR!
61.1566Walt(e) I'm not...MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Fri Jan 06 1995 13:3415
    |		   x  o	|		legend:
    |		 0 x  o |			x = Pats players
    |	-->	   x  o |			o = Browns players
    |		  	|			0 = football
    ^			^
    point		10 yds
    ball was 		away
    kicked 
    from
    
    	It looked to me like the Pats kicked it behind thier own men who
    blocked the Browns off the ball until it went 10 yards.  No?
    
    
    billl
61.1567SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jan 06 1995 13:557
    
    	That is what I saw...except the Browns players were behind the 10
    yard mark and the pats were hitting them there.  I didn't notice any
    Browns guy going for any ball at all.
    
    	WSOOF!
    
61.1568ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralFri Jan 06 1995 14:013
61.1569MIMS::ROLLINS_RFri Jan 06 1995 14:4313
>    There's no fair catch on a bouncing kickoff.  If there were, and if it
>    were required that the receiving team get a clean first shot at the
>    ball, there'd really be no point to the onside kick rule (you'd only 
>    be able to recover fumbles, just as with punts).  As long as the Pats 
>    didn't bowl over a player without the ball to put him out of the play,
>    there's no call.  And even then, in practice the officials usually let
>    it go, as onsides kicks are free-for-alls...
>    
>    glenn
    
     Glenn's right, you can fair catch the ball if it doesn't hit the ground
     first.  Once it hits the ground, both teams are entitled to the ballm
     so who would be interfering with whom ?
61.1570AKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberFri Jan 06 1995 15:157
    Cleveland team may have thought ball would go out of bounds or not make
    the 10 yards.  Ironically Bahr thought his first kick was perfect and
    the second a mistake.
    
    Problem with browns attempting to field the ball before going 10 yards
    is that once they touch it it is live and if they don't cover it
    cleanly it can be like a fumble.
61.1571The play made me wonderSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Jan 06 1995 15:3431
>    	It looked to me like the Pats kicked it behind thier own men who
>    blocked the Browns off the ball until it went 10 yards.  No?
 
Yes

>    Ok, so, if the Browns had tried to get the ball but was interfered with
>    by one of the Pats guys because the ball was kicked behind the kicking
>    team....what would have happened? 

I thought the rule was the kicking team couldn't touch the ball for 10 yards 
nor touch the receiver before they had a chance to receive the ball.  So when
the onside kick happened, I really thought the Patsies were going to get an
interference call.  But one of 4 things must have happened.

1)	The Patsies somehow made a wedge and kept from "interfering" with
	the Browns.  (not likely, but possible, I don't remember the play
	well enough).

2)	The referees screwed up.  (Wouldn't be the first time)

3)	Only one player on the Browns (Metcalf?) is designated a receiver
	by rule?

4)	I'm totally screwed up.  (Wouldn't be the first time)

 
>	    Woulda coulda shoulda coming from the man who backs the 0-4 in NFL
>    Championship Games DONKS!

	Almost got that right.  That came from the man that backs the Donks
and the Boston Red Sox.  I think I'm eternally doomed to woulda coulda shoulda.
61.1572SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jan 06 1995 16:5028
    
    Just read the USA today.  Good artical about the Cleveland/Pigturd
    game.  It goes on and says that Art had to be excorted out of the 
    stadium by 40 police.  As he leaves you can hear him say.....
    
    	       "We'll be back here"
    
    
    	It also says something about how the Pigsturd players were pissed
    because some of the Browns didn't want to shake hands with them after
    the game.  "They won't admit that we (Pigsturd) is the better team"
    said Rod Woodhead.
    
    	Then it goes on saying....."We will prove we are the better team"
    said Vinnie Baby. 
    
    	I believe they will prove who is the better team.
    
    		C L E V E L A N D   B R O W N S 
    
    
    			T H E   D A W G S 
    
    		
    				#1
    
    
    WOOF!
61.1573ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralFri Jan 06 1995 16:594
61.1574ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsFri Jan 06 1995 17:0112
    
>    	I believe they will prove who is the better team.
    
    I sincerely doubt the Browns will prove themselves the better team
    on Sunday.  Pittsburgh can; with any win, it's hard to argue
    otherwise.  For the Browns to prove themselves a better team (a
    different matter altogether from winning, which I do believe they
    will do), they'll have to completely blow out Pittsburgh _even
    while Pittsburgh's playing reasonably well_.  If that happens, I'll
    be every bit as shocked as JaKe.
    
    Joe
61.1575SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jan 06 1995 17:1634
                      C L E V E L A N D   B R O W N S 

		                      ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                                    /            
                            /\^^^^^^
                            \_______________

                            T H E   D A W G S 

    
    Oh come on here....what was Pigsturds record....one win better than 
    the Browns...so, if the Browns didn't have so many turnovers it could
    very well be the other way around....the Browns one game better than 
    the Squeelers.  And in that first game, even with the turnovers, the
    Browns had driven down and gotten a TD but it was called back because
    of a penalty.  That close.  So, how in the hell can anyone really say
    the Squeelers are *that* much better than the Browns.  It is beyond
    me.  No way.  The Browns are the better team and they will prove that
    on Saturday.  I would have to say that if the Browns don't win, they
    choked.....3 times.  It won't happen, Cleveland will win this game and 
    it won't have to be a blowout either.  A solid performance like last
    week with no mistakes will be enough.  
    
    	Its gona be a DAWG fight!
    
    GO CLEVELAND
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1576HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jan 06 1995 17:249
RE<<< Note 61.1574 by ROCK::HUBER "Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions" >>>

>    I sincerely doubt the Browns will prove themselves the better team
>    on Sunday.  

  When is this game anyway? Isn't it on Saturday? I thought they said the
Miami v. S.D. game was Sunday.

  George
61.1577MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Fri Jan 06 1995 17:257
    >Win or lose Pittsburgh is the better team... so if they lose THEY
    
    Nice attempt at the old reverse KOD, Groaner.  We all know that
    that never works.
    
    
    billl
61.1578ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsFri Jan 06 1995 17:367
    
> When is this game anyway? Isn't it on Saturday? I thought they said the
> Miami v. S.D. game was Sunday.
    
    It's Saturday; I was in error.
    
    Joe
61.1579SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jan 06 1995 17:4511
    
    Which brings me to another point.....I just don't understand this
    one...
    
    	Why would the teams that played last Sunday have to play this
    Saturday?  Why not play them again on Sunday.  Doesn't this give
    another advantage to the teams that haven't played?  So, the Browns
    and Bears have to play on 6 days rest instead of the normal 7....
    Doesn't make sence to me....anybody else?
    
    	GRRRRRRRRR!
61.1580MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Fri Jan 06 1995 18:215
    re .1579:
    
    We're not building up our excuses already now are we?
    
    billl
61.1581reward, not punishmentHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 06 1995 18:3110
Hal,

If'n them Dawgs had won the conferences best record they coulda took the
week off and then played on Saturday agin some team that play laste
Sunday.

It's part of the reward for the #1 seed in the conference. Cleveburgh
coulda had it excepted for them games they lost to the Steelhaids.

TTom
61.1582PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Fri Jan 06 1995 18:4716
    
    >>the Browns...so, if the Browns didn't have so many turnovers it could
    >>very well be the other way around....the Browns one game better than 
    >>the Squeelers.  And in that first game, even with the turnovers, the
    
    Generally, the better teams have a good +/- ratio when it comes to
    turnovers, Clevescum, luckily, played enough stiffs that their turnover
    ratio being in the - end didn't hurt them as much.
    
    The statement above shows how much you need to clean the diaper
    droppings outta yer haid, HAL.  
    
    VINNY KNOWS INTERCEPTIONS!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.1583Peacock says Browns play sat noonAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberFri Jan 06 1995 19:036
    I think the Saturday - Sunday thing has to do with 4pm tv which was
    locked up by the two coast home teams leaving Dallas and Pitt for Sat.
    vs Sunday and tv probably made the choice there too.
    
    I doubt you'd ever see a credible explanation from the league and
    anything that says tv controls it sounds credible to me.
61.1584and then what would happen?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 06 1995 19:186
TV could be interesting nexted week if San Fran wins and San Diego wins
while Pittsburgh loses. Then we got 2 west coast games.

In that case, who'd play at 11am-PST/1pm-EST  and who'd play at 1/4?

TTom
61.1585PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Fri Jan 06 1995 19:235
    There has already been talk that one of the games would be moved to the
    evening out east.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1586PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Fri Jan 06 1995 19:246
    Let me clarify that.  The NFL has said that if that scenario plays out,
    they, with the cooperation of the networks, will have the late game
    start at 4pm west coast time.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1587MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Fri Jan 06 1995 19:256
>>while Pittsburgh loses.
    
    Bite thy tongue, heathen!
    
    
    billl 
61.1588whoaHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 06 1995 19:305
Just posing something, there billlllll

Not trying to speak illllllll.

TTom
61.1589damn sticky keys ;^)MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Fri Jan 06 1995 19:344
    Okay, TTTTTom.  I wasn't ssssure.
    
    
    billl
61.1590lost own bowl contestHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 06 1995 19:364
I did all I could to put the KOD on Cleveland. I picked them to go the
Superbowl over there in the prediction topic.

TTom
61.1591SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jan 06 1995 21:4823


		                      ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                      WOOF!         /            
                            /\^^^^^^
                            \_______________

                             BE YOUR OWN DAWG

    
    
    
    			A CLEVELAND BROWN DAWG!
    
    
    
    
    			MAY THE VERY BEST TEAM WIN THIS ONE!
    
61.1592ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsSat Jan 07 1995 17:426
    
    It's been ugly so far...
    
    27-3 with a little time left in the 3rd...
    
    Joe
61.1593ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralSat Jan 07 1995 18:289
61.1594TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns are HISTORY in 1995!!!Sat Jan 07 1995 18:3015
    
    
    	For the Pats/Browns lasted week I lost a PNAME bet, which I
    was obligated to keep until the Browns were no longer in the running
    for the Super Bowl this year.
    
     	Well, with 2 minutes to go, I think I've fulfilled my obligation.
    
    	Let the dancing on the Browns grave begin!!!
    
    
    	WWWWWWWWHHHHHHHAAAAAAAA  WWWWWHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
    
    JimH :-)
    
61.1595MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleSat Jan 07 1995 21:425
    A heartfelt thanks to the Steelers for minimizing the misery of
    most of us in ::sports/.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1596ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralSat Jan 07 1995 21:493
61.1597lemminow lemminowMASALA::DWALLACEDigirolaSat Jan 07 1995 22:254
    Know this is the wrong note but anyone got the final/latest from the
    Dolphins/Chargers game ???
    
    Davie
61.1598Unless you gots a time travelling machineGONWST::OSULLIVANSun Jan 08 1995 05:062
    re: -.1 Try 1/8/95 Sunday at 12:30 pst
    
61.1599slapheidMASALA::DWALLACEDigirolaSun Jan 08 1995 17:073
    These continentals are deadly - I thought last night was Sunday night !
    Yours mistakenly,
                     Mr headonbackwards.
61.1600PTOS01::JACOBRONE STEP FROM THE SHOW!!Sun Jan 08 1995 19:104
    The game just started. 
    
    JaKe
    
61.1601MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleSun Jan 08 1995 21:278
    Nah, ObnoxiousDawg no misery left for Jets fans we sorta expect bad
    moves to happen; but for the fan who claimed his team was the greatest
    and then lost 3 times to those dastardly rivals the Pigsturd Steelers
    that is true misery. Wouldn't want to take any of that misery away from
    you. Enjoy it!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1602ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralSun Jan 08 1995 21:533
61.1603Chargers 22 - Miami 21CSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Sun Jan 08 1995 22:5515
>>               <<< Note 61.1597 by MASALA::DWALLACE "Digirola" >>>
>>                             -< lemminow lemminow >-

>>    Know this is the wrong note but anyone got the final/latest from the
>>    Dolphins/Chargers game ???

Chargers come from behind to win it 22-21.  Miami's Stoyanovich missed
a 37 yard field goal attempt with 7 seconds left.  FWIW, it was a very
poorly officiated game, but the bad calls seemed to balance out.  The
main difference in the game was that San Diego kept the ball away from
the Dolphins for most of the second half.  The game was 21-6, Miami,
at half, and the Chargers went ahead with 48 seconds left in the game.
All things considered, bit was probably the best game of the weekend.

Jerry
61.1604close oneGONWST::OSULLIVANMon Jan 09 1995 01:143
    re: -.1
    
    Thought that was a 47 yarder?  Certainly makeable.
61.1605PretendersWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCanes and Hoyas,Canes and HoyasMon Jan 09 1995 11:148
    
    
    
    
        ahhhhhhh HAAAAAA HAAAAA
    
    
    Browns Sip!!!!!!!!!!
61.1606MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Jan 09 1995 11:389
>  <<< Note 61.1605 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Canes and Hoyas,Canes and Hoyas" >>>
>                                -< Pretenders >-
>    
>        ahhhhhhh HAAAAAA HAAAAA
>    
>    
>    Browns Sip!!!!!!!!!!

     And yet still are obviously FAR better than your team of losers.
61.1607Hey, compared to expectationsMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRMon Jan 09 1995 11:4916
I've always felt that a team's success is a function of expectations.  For
example, the Mets' playing near .500 ball probably made TCM pretty happy.
Likewise, the LA Kings' run to the cup final in 1993 was a smashing success,
regardless of the outcome.

By that reasoning, which admittedly doesn't allow as much room for the pure
fun of gloating and trash talking, the Browns had a very fine season.  The
trick now is to continue to improve.

Congratulations, Browns fans, on your success.  Congratulations to Joe Huber,
especially, for enjoying it in a safe and sane fashion.  As for you, Hal, I
hope you made good use of today (day off? business trip?), because there's
enough crow waiting around to feed Thanksgiving Dinner to the whole city
of Cleveland.  Really sorry I won't be back in here til Friday.

Steve
61.1608and the td that was that wasn't??????CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Jan 09 1995 11:549
 yes it was a 47 yard attemp. I didn't see the whole game but it sure
 seemed to me per usual Shula got the better of the calls. I mean whoever
 heard of a forward lateral being called a forward pass by a tight end
 no less? Plus the Pass interference to get them in range was boardline.
 Let's put it this way if it had been Vincent and Seay involved do you
 think we'd have seen a flag???????//

 mike
61.1609ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralMon Jan 09 1995 12:523
61.1610How 'bout them Steelers!MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Mon Jan 09 1995 13:128
    Sent Hal mail regarding p-name wager.  He'll be in Tuesday sporting
    a very appropriate p-name that he must keep for five of HIS business/
    noting days.  I'll be on vaca, skiing at Sunday River, Tuesday through
    Thursday, but I'm sure he'll honor the wager.  Afterall he's from
    Cleveland, not New York.
    
    
    billl
61.1611gawd i hate crow feathersTNPUBS::ALVEYPogue MahoneMon Jan 09 1995 13:1014
    No, they didn't all sip.
    Vinnie sips.
    Bill Belichek sips.
    Art Modell sips.
    If anyone with half a brain was at the helm,
    somebody other that Vinnie would have started the second half.
    You got a weapon like Metcalf and you don't give
    him the ball until the second half????
    Poor Pepper Johnson, he's the only member of the team
    that showed up to play.
    Congrats, JaKe etal, and good luck as this thang plays out.
    
    dr.a
    
61.1612MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Mon Jan 09 1995 13:226
    It's good to see all those Browns fans in here like real men, but
    I'm kinda suprised that note 50.x is quiet.
    
    
    
    billl
61.1613PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS-1994 AFC Central ChampsMon Jan 09 1995 13:307
    One thing that suprized me about the game was that, fr the most part,
    Leroy Hoard was a non player.  The guy leads the team in rushing fer
    the season and ya bench him fer the most important game of the
    year?????
    
    JaKe
    
61.1614SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Mon Jan 09 1995 13:3112
    
    	I saw the following on a milk carton this morning.
    
    		MISSING CLEVELAND BROWNS FOOTBALL TEAM.
    		IF SEEN CALL 1-800-STEELERS.
    
    	I can't remember a more pitiful weekend of PLAYOFF football ever.
    The Browns, Bears, and Packers should be embrassed. These games were
    over in the first half. Then you have all the controversial calls
    in the Miami/SD game. Just a bad weekend for the NFL.
    
    Ron
61.1615PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS-1994 AFC Central ChampsMon Jan 09 1995 13:326
    re.1614
    
    ROLLWARD!!!
    
    JaKe
    
61.1616CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 09 1995 13:3511
While not a fan of either team, I did watch the game with interest.

Quite honestly, I think Cleveland needs to get rid of Testeverde.  This
guy just doesn't have what it takes to be a big league QB.  No leadership,
no ability in the clutch, and he doesn't seem to be able to put two good
games back to back.

His receivers did suck though, on Saturday.  Wow, lots of drops.....


'Saw
61.1617ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS, best in the AFCMon Jan 09 1995 13:3811
61.1618woulda been something elseHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 13:4111
Cleveland looked like a team waiting for a_excuse to choke. The drops by
Alexander just got this outta the way sooner.

If'n they hadn't dropped them passes, they woulda looked for another
reason to stink up the place.

The Browns basic problem begins with the Head Coach and extends through
his choice at QB, Vinny. The rest of the team has a lot of potential but
Big Bill and Vinny are just too much dead weight to carry.

TTom
61.1619PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS-1994 AFC Central ChampsMon Jan 09 1995 13:4317
    
    >>Cleveland completely got away from their game plan after Pittsburgh
    >>took the 14-3 lead.  This is Big Bill's fault.  Hoard was not used.
    
    Actually, the lead was 17-0 before Bumblin' Bill decided, with 4th and
    inches on the STEELERS' 4, to take the three points insteading of going
    for it, knowing he needed a TD.  The STEELERS had enough time (under 2
    minutes) to drive downfield and put it away wif anohter TD to go to the
    half at 24-3.
    
   What I found VERY interesting about the game was that, for once, it was
    the offense that son it for the STEELERS.  They kept the 'Spots defense
    on the field for over 42 minutes. Only gave them 17 minutes to score
    wif in the game.  Great game offensively fer the STEELERS.
    
    JaKe
    \
61.1620FG = The EndHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 13:476
That there FG was the white flad for Cleveburgh.

You're down and looking bad so the Browns look like all they can think
about is not getting shut out. A truly chicken scratching call.

TTom
61.1621MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Jan 09 1995 13:528
>    Actually, the lead was 17-0 before Bumblin' Bill decided, with 4th and
>    inches on the STEELERS' 4, to take the three points insteading of going
>    for it, knowing he needed a TD.  The STEELERS had enough time (under 2
>    minutes) to drive downfield and put it away wif anohter TD to go to the
>    half at 24-3.
    
     Actually, it was a pretty short drive.  The INT that got the ball back
     for the Steelers put them somehwere around the 30, wasn't it ?
61.1622PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS-1994 AFC Central ChampsMon Jan 09 1995 18:3311
    
    >> Actually, it was a pretty short drive.  The INT that got the ball back
    >> for the Steelers put them somehwere around the 30, wasn't it ?

    I think the short drive that was from the 9 or so after Tim McKyer's
    int was teh one that made it 17-0.  the drive that made it 24-3 was off
    of a kickoff after the 'Spots scored to make it 17-3.
    
    JaKe
    
    
61.1623Vinny sold his soul for Pats' game, I think...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jan 09 1995 18:4121
    That call for the FG, down 17-0, was probably the most inexplicable
    coaching decision I saw all year long.  Made no sense on every level,
    practical and psychological.  Maybe Belicheck needs to take the
    NFL's "Coaches' Introduction to Basic Probabilities" seminar.
    
    Testaverde's performance wasn't a big factor in this game, but he
    really is just without a clue under pressure, isn't he?  Three big
    plays under strong Steeler pursuit, each of which Vinny handled
    differently, and wrongly under the situation.  First he throws an INT 
    with 30 seconds left in the half, when even taking a sack would have
    been acceptable.  Then, he holds the ball forever in the end zone when
    he absolutely can't afford a sack, on a play that the QB gets rid of
    it without too much trouble 95% of the time.  Finally, Vinny's hotly 
    pursued on  a roll-out and he _does_ throw the ball into the cheap 
    seats.  Only thing is, it's 4th down, where that wounded duck downfield 
    wouldn't have been a bad play.  It's like you're looking at a rookie 
    out there instead of an 8-year veteran...
    
    glenn
       
61.1624MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Jan 09 1995 19:0010
>    I think the short drive that was from the 9 or so after Tim McKyer's
>    int was teh one that made it 17-0.  the drive that made it 24-3 was off
>    of a kickoff after the 'Spots scored to make it 17-3.

     Nope, because I was on the road Saturday.  I turned in when the Browns
     were kicking off to Pitt.  The Steelers made a big pass but fumbled on
     the end of the play, and Cleveland has the ball with ~2 minutes left
     in the half, trailing 17-3.  Vinny made a terrible mistake in throwing
     the ball to McKyer to let Pittsburgh get up by 21 instead of 14 at the
     half.  But I definately hear the fumble, and then the INT.
61.1625the worst!HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 19:2112
>    That call for the FG, down 17-0, was probably the most inexplicable
>    coaching decision I saw all year long. 

Hear, here!

This will be the definitive rejoinder to anyone who doesn't think that
the Browns problem starts at the top. 

You almost feel sorry for the rest of the team and the fans. Having to
overcome Belichick and Vinny is just too much to ask of anyone.

TTom
61.1626HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 09 1995 19:3215
  I'm not usually one to defend the Browns, but I don't think that it is time
to start a witch hunt. Take a look at their record, they had a great year. As
for the playoffs, they are not really a test of team strength since they only
consist of one game at each level.

  No one besides the Steelers was able to beat the Browns consistently this
year and they even managed to beat Dallas.

  Joe Gibs who is doing TV for one of the networks made a point of looking
into the camera the other day and saying that Browns management should not
do anything hasty because of this one loss.

  The Browns had a fine year, this group should be given another shot.

  George
61.1627some are hopingHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 19:4414
>  The Browns had a fine year, this group should be given another shot.

And the faithful in Pittburgh hope that they listen to you, George.

I agree, with the exception of a head coach and a QB, this current Browns
team is pretty good. Put someone at the helm who's not a brain dead
chicken and give them a QB who can handle pressure and you got yourself
something.

Until then, they've gone about as far as they can go. They might make it
to the playoffs where they'll be beaten again by the better teams who
don't have to overcome Belichick and Vinny.

TTom
61.1628HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 09 1995 19:5815
Re               <<< Note 61.1627 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>

>I agree, with the exception of a head coach and a QB, this current Browns
>team is pretty good. Put someone at the helm who's not a brain dead
>chicken and give them a QB who can handle pressure and you got yourself
>something.

  How do you get to ... what was it 13-3? ... with a brain dead coach and
no QB. They're not that bad.

  As I understand the coach is a guy who use to work for Parcells and is just
starting out as head coach. Is there evidence that he can't learn from his
mistakes? Seems this team has come quite a ways in just a few years. 

  George
61.1629Belicheck yes, Testaverde no...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jan 09 1995 20:0311
    Belicheck deserves credit, but Testaverde is not likely to get any
    better than he already is.  He didn't have a great year, and was not 
    a large contributor to the Browns' success.  The Browns won with a solid 
    running game but mainly a great defense.  It also didn't hurt that they
    played the weakest schedule in the entire NFL.  All told, if the Browns 
    think that Testaverde is the man to lead them to the next level, more
    disappointment in the playoffs will follow.
    
    glenn
    
61.1630belichick :== badHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 20:1518
Who made the call to kick the FG on 4th and short down 17-0? If you think
that this was a call by a coach who had a clue than I won't be able to
convince you otherwise.

That's as good a_indication as any for Belichick. If this were boxing, he
threw in the towel.

Like Glenn says, they got as far as they did on other support on offense,
a very good defense, especially in terms of the points allowed and
kindness in the schedule.

Hey, I aint bad mouthing the team. A lot of those players would start
and/or star for many teams. Perry, Turner and others on defense stand
out.

Hail, I got that there LeRoy Hoard on my FFL team. 'Nuff said.

TTom
61.1631HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 09 1995 20:2813
Re               <<< Note 61.1630 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>

>Who made the call to kick the FG on 4th and short down 17-0? If you think
>that this was a call by a coach who had a clue than I won't be able to
>convince you otherwise.

  I've often heard coaches say that if you have no points at all it's important
to get on the boards with something. Now maybe that makes sense and maybe it
does not, but when I see a coach take a team to 13-3 and I hear a coach like
Joe Gibs say he deserves more time then I wouldn't can him just because the
fans are upset that he kicked in one game when he was down 17-0.

  George
61.1632PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS-1994 AFC Central ChampsMon Jan 09 1995 22:304
    It was 11-5, George, not 13-3.
    
    JaKe
    
61.1633ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsTue Jan 10 1995 11:2418
    
    George, the problem is that while Belichek has strengths (well,
    at least one notable one - he drafts well), he's got notable
    weaknesses, and in the three or four years he's been in Cleveland 
    has given no sign of overcoming them.  He doesn't handle his players
    well, makes inane coaching decisions, and just to top it off considers
    the fans to be his biggest enemy.  You want him as coach?  You've
    got him - I'll trade him even up for Parcells any day.
    
    The Browns won in spite of Bill and Vinny, not because of them.
    When your quarterback has as many really lousy games as good games
    (both occur about once every four games), and that's his best
    season, you aren't going far.
    
    Hey, maybe we could trade Bill and Vinny for Parcells and Bledsoe...
    now _then_ you'd have something... B^)
    
    Joe
61.1634Peter PrincipleHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 10 1995 11:3513
Belichick suffers from the same problem that inflicts a lot of other
coaches in the NFL. It's the Peter Principle.

There is little or no doubt that Belichick was a factor in the Giants
under Parcells. He shoulda stayed as a defensive coordinator.

The same can be said of Buddy Ryan, another defensive whiz who is a lousy
head coach.

This may be of some concern to the Panthers in their quest for Capers
who's also a defensive coordinator.

TTom
61.1635Bozo the CoachTNPUBS::ALVEYPogue MahoneWed Jan 11 1995 17:1913
    Exactly right, TTom.
    These guys are usually control freaks who try to
    impose their views on the big picture.  The NFL is
    rife with 'em:
    Ron Erhardt, Belichek, Buddy Ryan, Bud Carson,
    Bill Arnsbarger (although he seems to know his
    best position is OC).
    Two I suspect will be joining them are Mike Shanahan
    and Tony Dungy.
    These guys also tend to being paranoid and adversarial
    with the press.
    dr.a
    
61.1636"NOT" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRPittsbugh Steelers == my heros!Tue Jan 17 1995 16:5015
    
    		Haven't heard much from the Browns facilities since the
    	game.....I wonder what their saying....must be something like....
    
    
    
    	We could have played a better game and WON against the Chargers.
    
    
    
    
    		Pigsturd Sqeelers  SUCK!
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1637CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Tue Jan 17 1995 17:0421
>    		Haven't heard much from the Browns facilities since the
>    	game.....I wonder what their saying....must be something like....
>    
>    	We could have played a better game and WON against the Chargers.
>    
>    		Pigsturd Sqeelers  SUCK!
>    
>    	WOOF!
>    

Well, if they suck so much the Browns should have beaten them.

But bottom line, when you pin your hopes on Vinny, when you pin your hopes
on him having two good games in a row, you're gonna get burned.


Perhaps if the Browns add a few more coaches for next year, and some more
equipment, they might make it over the top......



61.1638HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 17 1995 17:146
  So why did the Browns get rid of Bernie Kosar? Was he all that bad?

  Of course if Kosar had used up 30 more seconds on his last regular season
drive at Miami there would have been no Flutie bomb.

  George
61.1639ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsTue Jan 17 1995 17:208
    
> Perhaps if the Browns add a few more coaches for next year, and some more
> equipment, they might make it over the top......
    
    Actually, if one of the coaches replaces Belichek, and the equipment
    includes a mechanical QB...
    
    Joe
61.1640Hope this isn't a nest of snakes...MUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Jan 20 1995 15:334
Just out of curiosity, Hal, is the typo in your enforced p-name an
accident or a message?

Steve
61.1641OUTSRC::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Jan 20 1995 15:461
61.1642SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCleveland Cavs = best NBA defenseFri Jan 20 1995 16:2010
    
    No it is not an accident.....when Billll sent me the note telling me 
    what I had to put in my p name..........thats how he spelt it.
    
    	hahahahahahahahahahaha
    
    just carried it on....
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1643SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCleveland Cavs = best NBA defenseFri Jan 20 1995 16:228
    I can't believe they put Perry on the list.
    
    Then putting Carrier on there too....hell....please put Vinnie on
    there!
    
    WOOF!
    
    
61.1644par for the courseHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 20 1995 16:278
Sorry, but we aint takin Vinny off of your hands.

Besides, he's Big Bill's Boy so y'all better get used to it. With the
coaching, and hence the cast, that the Browns have, thised year is about
as good as it'll ever get. Win some games, make a wild card, get blowed
out somewhere short of going anywhere.

TTom
61.1645draft McNairTNPUBS::ALVEYBiologically driven to hunt giraffesFri Jan 20 1995 16:525
    They did, however, leave Mark Rypien unprotected.
    Belichek is an ass.  I wish Art Modell would regain
    consciousness and fire him.
    dr.a
    
61.1646ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jan 20 1995 16:5711
61.1647maybe, maybe notHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 20 1995 17:0113
If'n Cleveburgh is dumpin Rypien for the money, would they be willing to
cough up even more for Miller. Rypien is making around 900K, while Miller
is making around 2.4 mil.

Also, I've never seen what anybody sees in Miller. He put up some yardage
while at Atlanta but a lot of that was desparation throwing cause the
Falcons sucked and were usually behind big. He never showed anything in
LA.

I suggest you contact the Richardson who seem willing to talk to anybody
about anything even if'n means getting fined money and draft picks.

TTom
61.1648ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsFri Jan 20 1995 17:116
    
> Also, I've never seen what anybody sees in Miller.
    
    He's not Vinny Testaverde?
    
    Joe
61.1649ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsFri Jan 20 1995 18:3910
    
    Cleveland quote of the day:
    
    Pete Franklin, long time radio sports talk show host, once based in
    Cleveland, on Bill Belichick:

            He's so cold you can stand in the same room with him and
            catch pneumonia.
    
    Joe
61.1650ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Mar 27 1995 11:5731
61.1651Pats will have a better record count on itAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Mon Mar 27 1995 15:5112
    
    
    re -.1 
    
    > Can Vinnie get the ball to Rison?
    
    
     In a word No.
    
    HTH
    
    Jerry
61.1652ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Mar 28 1995 01:318
61.1653PTOSS1::JACOBRTue Mar 28 1995 01:517
    
    >>So the Browns have no one to throw to the top receiver in the league
    
    Why would they want to throw to Jerry Rice????
    
    JaKe
    
61.1654ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Mar 28 1995 11:236
61.1655Pats 11-5 AFC East champsAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Tue Mar 28 1995 11:2610
    
    
      Paul...
    
      I am the first to admit the Pats lost two to the 'Spots.  No question
    about it.  I am stating that the Pats upside is greater than the 'Spots
    and will finish higher this year and probably the next few years.  Face
    it the 'Spots had their chance last year and blew it.
    
    Jerry
61.1656whatta ya expect?HBAHBA::HAASrecurring recusancyTue Mar 28 1995 16:0711
I don't know if'n you can say Cleveland blew it.

They got Vinnie at the helm and a_idiot for a coach. So it's hard to say
they shoulda won anything.

Now they've mortgaged their future on that haid case Rison which should
really start their slide into oblivion. You can bet your hat, ass and
overcoat that Rison'll be whining soon. He'll be crying about how his
stats are down, mostly cause Vinnie caint get the ball to him.

TTom
61.1657ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Mar 28 1995 17:2114
> Now they've mortgaged their future on that haid case Rison which should
> really start their slide into oblivion. You can bet your hat, ass and
> overcoat that Rison'll be whining soon. He'll be crying about how his
> stats are down, mostly cause Vinnie caint get the ball to him.
    
    Huh?  If they'd traded something significant for him, I'd agree.
    They didn't - all he costs is $.  Not that I would have signed
    him, but still...
    
    The bigger loss, IMHO, is Baldwin.  Metcalf didn't really help the
    team save as a return man.  If Baldwin's around, Metcalf (as talented
    as he is) is expendable.  But Baldwin's gone...
    
    Joe
61.1658salary cap dollars not available for othersHBAHBA::HAASrecurring recusancyTue Mar 28 1995 17:5612
By that I meant in terms of the salary cap.

We've all seen how hard it has become to hold onto even good players
because of the cap. Dallas is a case in point. By giving all this money
to Rison, they have that much less to spend on other talent. They didn't
trade anyone for him but all the money going Rison's way will keep them
from getting some others.

And thanks for Baldwin. All of us down here in Charlotte are looking
forward to seeing him play.

TTom
61.1659PTOSS1::JACOBRNOTFabio,&amp; I don't play him on TVThu Jun 29 1995 15:536
    Brown(spot)s(tm) SUCK ETERNALLY!!!!!
    
    Film at 11
    
    JaKe
    
61.1660The excuses begin before Training camp opensOURGNG::RIGGENNetworks Sales &amp; MarketingFri Jul 07 1995 15:1917
    ESPNET SportsZone | NFL
    
    Vinny's Secret
    
    Pro Football Weekly
       
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Brown QB Vinny Testaverde now says he had trouble throwing deep for
    most of last season because of a separated shoulder suffered in October 
    1993 .Nobody really knew about it, Testaverde said. I never said anything 
    except briefly to (trainer) Bill Tessendorf. Not even the coaches knew. It
    wasn't until the end of last season that I felt I could get the ball 
    downfield the way I wanted to. During the season, Testaverde completed
    only five passes of 50 yards or more (one in the last 11 games) and six 
    of between 31 and 49 yards.
    
61.1661ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 21 1995 16:574
61.1662CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianFri Jul 21 1995 17:3716
I hardly think Sox fans are front-runner fans.   In fact, those two phrases in
the same sentence are probably the biggest oxymoron around.

All the fans I know have stuck with the team through thick and thin and there's
been lots more thick than thin.

I was lucky.  My second season was the Dream Season of 1967, but my dad
followed them and the Boston Braves through lots more years and lots more lean
times.  Nothin could be leaner in a contemporary lifetime than the Sox 50s and
early 60s, unless you were perhaps a Washington Senators fan or a Philadelphia
Athletics fan.

Course, my dad was alive the last time the Sox won a WS.


'Saw
61.1663"we luv ya anyway..."USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jul 21 1995 17:4712
>I hardly think Sox fans are front-runner fans.

>All the fans I know have stuck with the team through thick and thin and there's
>been lots more thick than thin.


Though we're bitter rivals, I believe Red Sox fans are the most loyal
in all of sports.  When you consider the lack of accomplishment, their
support is undying, unconditional, and truly amazing.


(the above IS a complement, BTW...)
61.1664CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianFri Jul 21 1995 17:5121
>(the above IS a complement, BTW...)

Thanks, and is taken a such.

There's something to be said for all of that too.  I can remember many, many
years when the Sox would be doing something fantastic in June, and my dad would
say to me "Look out, August is just around the corner."

If he was really in a bad mood, or if I'd gotten on his sh*t list, and we'd be
listening or watching a game together, he'd always take a shot at me about
Bucky Dent.  ("Dirty pool, Dad, that's really dirty pool")

There's a cynicism you develop, but there's the loyalty and the attitude that
we develop of "*I* can say they suck, but you hadn't better say they suck"


Like I said, I think that only Senator or Athletics fans had it tougher....


'Saw

61.1665Browns to take it all.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERFri Jul 21 1995 17:5215
    
    	Just got my pre-season BNI mag the other day......It sounds like
    the Browns are going to the big game this year....year 5 of the
    contract.  The Browns are boasting the best offensive line in the NFL
    this year.....I think anyone can be the QB for the browns this year
    and make good.  Big question this year will be the defensive line and
    special teams.  Eric Turner is holding out for the big bucks like
    Rison got.  Lets hope he is not out for too long.  Model says he won't
    talk about the stadium till the end of the season.  He doesn't want 
    to distract the team who is on a mission!.....the SUPER BOWL!
    
    	Go DAWGS!
    
    	WOOF!!!
    
61.1666ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 21 1995 18:006
    
    A number of the preseason rags have been really high on the Browns,
    but I just don't see it.
    
    Joe (expecting 8-8 or 9-7, and still hoping for 0-however many it
         takes to run Bellichek out of town)
61.1667ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 21 1995 18:457
61.1668You can never say that 'bout the sox AD::HEATHTribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way)Fri Jul 21 1995 19:0214
    
    
    
    re -.1
    
     >> Okay... okay... Pats fans and fair-weather... those two words are
        interchangeable.
    
        As much as it pains me to say it but for the most part that is
    true.  I have always been a Pats fan and always will but for the most
    part the Pats have only drawn well when they are on a roll.
    
    
    Jerry
61.1669MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Fri Jul 21 1995 19:368
    
       I'd venture to geuss that 60-70% of Pats season ticket holders do
      not predate the hiring of Parcells. The crowd at games these days
      looks nothing like the crowd that you used to see 10-15 years ago.
      Though that's not a completely bad thing because now you see a lot
      more women and kids and less rowdyism. But the move onto the Pats 
      bandwagon has been exceeded only by all those folks jumping on the 
      Indians' bandwagon with Groaner as their leader.
61.1670I doubt redsox fans would've supported likes of IndiansAKOCOA::BREENFri Jul 21 1995 19:5714
    How would you know about the Redsox drawing if they weren't in
    contention?  The only draught they had was '92,'93 and '94 and even
    then they managed thru some miracle to pretend to contend with the
    likes of Billy Hatcher in centerfield.
    
    Two division winners in the 80s and a division playoff berth lost on
    the last weekend in the strike season of '81/'82.  '80-85 was a
    rebuilding period when the strong team was dismantled by Haywood but
    even then there was some excitement and hope but also a dropoff in
    attendance.
    
    Yes, strong interest from 1967 to the present with no considerable
    dropoff but no real challenge that the likes of a patriots or indians
    could present.
61.1671CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianMon Jul 24 1995 13:0218
Bill, 

I think you're leaving out the legacy aspect of Red Sox fandom.

I heard all the stories as a kid of the years before I was born.  The stories
of the '46 World Series.

Plus, for me personally, I'd rather be in the cellar the whole time than come
close but not make it.  I think a lot of the angst of Red Sox fandom is
produced by the years that they did well, came very close, but didn't make it.
That's almost rougher in some ways than having them in the cellar since April.

So, there HAVE been lean years since 1967.  Most Sox fans, I'd bet, would view
it as a low period, punctuated by some peaks.


JMHO,
'Saw
61.1672Not much lean, 67-91AKOCOA::BREENMon Jul 24 1995 13:2114
    Well there was a long draught from 59-66 and attendance showed it
    dropping from the perennial million/per of the 50s to a low in the
    600s in mid-sixty.
    
    The only lean time was 83-85 but the progression to contender was
    obvious and momemtum wasn't lost.
    
    Yeh, Redsox do consider anything not a division pennant a lean year but
    in 72-74 they were in first late in the year, 77-80 they contended.
    
    But yes, in the hearts and minds they were always there.  Look at
    Cleveland which had a whole generation grow up, go off to college, lead
    normal lives without the Indians ever tantalizing them.  No wonder they
    go bonkers now.
61.1673CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianMon Jul 24 1995 13:2515
Plus, I think you have to consider all the folks all over New England who
aren't in this area and can't get to Fenway easily.   

I'm thinking of the old codger in Maine, who would consider it a big event in
life to be in Fenway just once.  Or the young kid in northern Vermont who's
never been there either.

I'll never forget my first time in Fenway.  As a kid we didn't have a lot of
money for extras like that, and while my dad always wanted to take me, we did
end up going together when I was in the Fire Dept and we had a group trip.

What an experience.


So, I think it's more than just attendance....
61.1674Imagine being a fan of the LA ClippersMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Mon Jul 24 1995 13:4218
'Saw, I have to agree with Bill on this one.

> Plus, for me personally, I'd rather be in the cellar the whole time than come
> close but not make it.  I think a lot of the angst of Red Sox fandom is
> produced by the years that they did well, came very close, but didn't make it.
> That's almost rougher in some ways than having them in the cellar since April.

But for thirty straight years?  I have to believe a tough loss is easier to
live with than the knowledge that your team is so abominably managed that it
may not contend in your lifetime, that when you go to the ballpark you are
certain to see poor baseball, and that no help is in sight.  That's what being
an Indians fan has meant since the infamous Colavito deal.

It's also been the lot of the Chicago Cubs fan, of course, with one division
title since 1945, but they keep filling Wrigley with fans, just the same.  If
anyone gets my vote for most loyal fans in baseball, that's it.

Steve
61.1675CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianMon Jul 24 1995 14:0413
Well, to each his own, I guess.

Is the heartbreak to a fan worse if the team is in the cellar than if the ball
goes through Buckner's legs?

I don't know one Red Sox fan who has ever said "Man, if that ball didn't go
through Buckner's legs..." or said "Wow, if Bucky hadn't hit that homer".


Cubs fans rank right up there with Sox fans in terms of angst, IMO.


'Saw
61.1676In a given season...MUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Mon Jul 24 1995 15:1714
Yeah, I'll buy that.  Finishing in the cellar happens over the whole season,
it's a gradual ache, while a heartbreaking loss on a single play is a shock
to the system.  It hurts like hell, probably more than finishing last, but
I'd still rather play in the World Series.

But finishing last forever is a different kind of hell, it's a permanent
badge of inferiority, and I'd rather lose in the 7th game of the World
Series EVERY YEAR than be a permanent doormat.

I know, Red Sox fans like to suffer in public.  But they have it a whole
lot better than Cubs and Indians fans have had it, and Cubs fans have
been positively heroic.

Steve
61.1677ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Jul 24 1995 16:5115
RE            <<< Note 61.1675 by CAMONE::WAY "Software Mortician" >>>

>I don't know one Red Sox fan who has ever said "Man, if that ball didn't go
>through Buckner's legs..." or said "Wow, if Bucky hadn't hit that homer".

  Of course if Buckner had caught that ball and Bucky had struck out most
likely the Sox would have lost those two games anyway. Maybe not but those two
plays were not game winners they were hyped to be by the press. 

  Personally I'd rather have my team come close from time to time than always be
in the cellar. Sooner or later even the BoSox bad luck will run out and they'll
win one of those Game 7s but if your always in the cellar about all you can talk
about is maybe being over .500 some year. Now that's dull. 

  George 
61.1678CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianMon Jul 24 1995 17:0610
Well, I guess that's why some folks like goose liver and some folks don't 8^)

I suppose each situation has its own kind of angst.

And granted, those two particular plays I mentioned didn't soley determine the
outcome of the game.   But there never was a more painful sight I'd bet than
the ball rolling between Billy Buck's legs....


'Saw
61.1679ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jul 24 1995 17:097
61.1680CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westMon Jul 24 1995 17:5910
    
    >The Indians did NOT finish in last place 30 straight years.  More
    > fact creation.
    
    Out of curiousity, does anyone know how many straight years the Indians
    were at least 10 games out of first by seasons end?  Wasn't that around
    30 years or so?
    
    Marc
    
61.1681USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jul 24 1995 18:046
>    Out of curiousity, does anyone know how many straight years the Indians
>    were at least 10 games out of first by seasons end?  Wasn't that around
>    30 years or so?

There's definitely something about 25+ games out in "so many seasons"
as being a record or something.
61.1682CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Mon Jul 24 1995 18:3212
    In order for a team to lose a WS,a Super Bowl,a Stanley Cup or an NBA
    title their has to be some outstanding highlights along the way that a
    fan can enjoy even after the loss. The Sox 86 loss was awful but the
    win in Game 5 with Henderson's HR had the fan's going nuts for a few
    days. The Pats improbable run to the Super Bowl will be 3 weeks I'll
    never forget. I can remember 5 Celtics championships but the 2 games
    I'll probably remember most were Games 6 and 7 of the series they
    played against the Sixers the year the C's won their first Bird-led 
    champeenship. I'll take rooting for the Red Sox instead of someone like
    the Padres any time. Yeah they'll rip our hearts out once a decade but
    if they ever won what else could we bitch and moan about? :^)
                                                                 
61.1683USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jul 24 1995 18:327
>Is the heartbreak to a fan worse if the team is in the cellar than if the ball
>goes through Buckner's legs?

The heartbreak is worse (IMO) in those shocking losses in championship
play.  But at least you've experienced the exhilaration of the chase.
To live at the bottom, never knowing the excitement of being in the
chase has to be a *dead* feeling.
61.1684ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Jul 24 1995 19:2014
RE            <<< Note 61.1678 by CAMONE::WAY "Software Mortician" >>>

>And granted, those two particular plays I mentioned didn't soley determine the
>outcome of the game.   But there never was a more painful sight I'd bet than
>the ball rolling between Billy Buck's legs....

  ... the pitch before when Stanley and Gedman got crossed up, Mitchell scored,
with Vin Scully yelling "THE GAME IS TIED, THE GAME IS TIED".

  That was the point where the Red Sox lost the World Series. That was the
point at which every experienced Red Sox fan knew that the tragedy was over
except for carry'en off the bodies.

  George
61.1685CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianMon Jul 24 1995 19:5821
>  ... the pitch before when Stanley and Gedman got crossed up, Mitchell scored,
>with Vin Scully yelling "THE GAME IS TIED, THE GAME IS TIED".

No doubt.  No doubt at all.  Yet most Red Sox fans remember Billy Buck FIRST, 
and then Stanley throwing the wild pitch that Squints Gedman couldn't find.



re the "dead" feeling.  I don't know about that.  Today perhaps.  But the times
like the Philadelphia Athletics and the Washington Senators had good fan bases
despite the poor performances of the teams.  I think the fans looked to
different things when their teams were so abyssmal, like perhaps one player
doing exceptionally well.

Of cousre I'd rather a team contend once in a while, but man is it tough when
you lose the big ones....


'Saw


61.1686Vardell is back!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERWed Jul 26 1995 15:178
    
    	Just saw in the paper the other day that Tommy Vardell has come off
    the unable to perform list and Leroy Hoard went on the unable to
    perform list.  Any ideas why Hoard went down???
    
    WOOF!
    
    
61.1687Just WonderingSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOWed Jul 26 1995 16:4015
A question for Paul, Hal, Joe, or other Browns fans.

I'm as you know, a Broncos not a Browns fan.  But as it turned out last year
I was able to watch more Browns then Broncos games out here on the East Coast.

My question is this.  I was terribly impressed by Tommy "TD" Brown.  However,
it didn't seem like they ran much offense for him, yet the man always seemed 
to get yardage and/or points when they got the ball to him.  Did you Browns 
fans think he was underutilized?

Good news about him being back.  I like him as a player despite his team.  On 
the same aspect, I'm sorry to hear about Hoard.  Hope he's back soon to take 
his lumps from my Broncos!

zamboni
61.1688ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jul 26 1995 17:158
    
    I assume you're talking about Tommy "TD" Vardell...
    
    He was injured fairly early on last year; up until that point,
    he did seem somewhat underutilized, but he wasn't available for
    long enough to really say.
    
    Joe
61.1689Ironhead > Touchdown TommyCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Jul 26 1995 18:241
    
61.1690Chris Everett > VinnyCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Jul 26 1995 18:251
    
61.1691Mathis > RisonCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Jul 26 1995 18:251
    
61.1692Sparks > TurnerCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Jul 26 1995 18:261
    
61.1693JB Crews > HalCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Jul 26 1995 18:271
    
61.1694Belichick > ReevesCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Jul 26 1995 18:281
    
61.1695Steelers > BrownsPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFThu Jul 27 1995 21:110
61.1696ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 27 1995 22:113
61.1697Take it to the bankPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jul 28 1995 19:315
  As long a Vinnie Interceptiverde is throwin the ball and as long as
  Billy Chick is the coach and as long as Art MoDumbbell is the owner,
  the Men of Steel will reign supreme in the AFC Central.

	Keith
61.1698GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Fri Jul 28 1995 20:174
    
    	You'd better tm those babies Keith!
    
    Claybone
61.1699ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 28 1995 20:364
61.1700Move em' Art OURGNG::RIGGENNetworks Sales &amp; MarketingFri Jul 28 1995 20:576
    snarf on the 1700
    
    wich is incidently the same # of assistant coaches for cleveland thised
    year. 
    
    Jeff
61.1701Black n Gold, colors to be proud of.PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jul 28 1995 21:236
>    Sounds like a pname wager is necessary.

  This is like takin candy from babies. OK, yer on. We cain work out the
  details the week before the first Steeler/'Spot matchup. 

	Keith
61.170260% of the offense on a cheap HR from a banjo hitter ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Aug 02 1995 14:2715
> Of course if Buckner had caught that ball and Bucky had struck out most
> likely the Sox would have lost those two games anyway. Maybe not but those two
> plays were not game winners they were hyped to be by the press. 
    
    Just read this (what's this doing in the Browns' note?-- oh yeah, we're 
    talking futility), and couldn't let it pass.  I've heard your arguments
    on Buckner before, George, but w.r.t Bucky Dent, there can be no "hype"
    associated with a 3-run homer in a 1-run ballgame, a 5-4 game at that.  
    If you consider the frequency of the 3-run homer (with the slam being 
    relatively rare), it's the most destructive offensive play in baseball, 
    like Earl Weaver used to preach. 
    
    glenn
    
61.1703ERICF::MAIEWSKIWed Aug 02 1995 19:003
  Didn't Reggie hit another hommer later in the game?

  George
61.1704USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Aug 02 1995 19:074
>  Didn't Reggie hit another hommer later in the game?

Yes, the deciding run (towering shot near the flagpole)...always forgotten
in the lament over Dent's HR.
61.1705ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameTue Aug 08 1995 02:455
61.1706OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Aug 08 1995 14:221
61.1707noting by proxyMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Aug 08 1995 16:2220
	Hot off the press....

	Browns have inked Jim "Blind Melon" McMahon to a one year deal.

	JaKe says this secures the Steelers as a lock for the AFC Central.


	for Groaner:

	JaKe wants to know if you will accept a p-name bet with him.
	If you loose you must use it for every note you enter until
	he comes back to Digital.  If he looses, he'll use the p-name
	of your choice for every note he enters in ::sprots.

	Jake figures between Groaner and Hal one, or both, will be dumb
	enough to take him up on it.



	billl
61.1708SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Aug 08 1995 17:005
  Since the Superbowl against the Pats 10 years ago how many seasons has
McMahon been the starting quarterback for a team and not sat out a significant
portion of the season due to injuries? 

  George
61.1709not latelyAKOCOA::BREENTue Aug 08 1995 18:226
    Almost never,  he's been the designated backup and either injury or
    poor performance boosts him to the starting spot.  I doubt his injury
    record the last 5 years is any worse than anyone else.  I know the
    Eagles seemed to do better with him that Randall.
    
    From '86-87 to 90, yes he was pretty much hors de combat.
61.1710MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Fri Aug 11 1995 13:0216
	A vewy, vewy reliable source has informed me that Vinnie
	Interceptiverde was hospitalized recently.  The team 
	would divulge no info other than he was suffering from a 
	severe allergic reaction.

	My source has spoken to a hospital official, that wished to 
	remain nameless.  Said official has stated that Vinnie's
	normally treatable reaction, which has now taken a much
	more severe turn, is his allergy to the game of football.

	Either that or "Blind Melon Chitlen" McMahon slipped him
	a 'mickey'.



	billl
61.1711allergic to competition?HBAHBA::HAASwake &amp; bakeFri Aug 11 1995 14:195
Based on Zeier's performance in the lasted game and the signing of
McMahon, perchance ol' Vinny had a reaction to the fack that he may be
the third best QB in Cleveland...

TTom
61.1712ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Aug 11 1995 14:248
    
    You know, I didn't get to see much of the CLE-NYG game, but what I
    did get to see was a bit of Zeier at QB, and I like the kid.  He's
    supposed to start the game this weekend; if he somehow manages to
    play significantly this season, I'll be much more fond of the Browns
    chances, even if Belichek is still a dink.
    
    Joe
61.1713If'n Zieier has erased those awful BC memoriesAKOCOA::BREENFri Aug 11 1995 14:333
    As long as he can avoid Philadelphia and the sight of Mike Mamula
    bearing down on him as in Aloha means goodbye.  He may want to avoid
    Detroit and Mr Boyd too. 
61.1714Kansas, not GeorgiaMYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Fri Aug 11 1995 14:414
I think it was Chad May who should be having nightmares
over the BC pass rush from the Aloha Bowl.

Mike
61.1715IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Aug 11 1995 15:115
>    As long as he can avoid Philadelphia and the sight of Mike Mamula
>    bearing down on him as in Aloha means goodbye.  He may want to avoid
>    Detroit and Mr Boyd too. 

Bill, you're thinking of Chad May.  Eric Zeier was Georgia's QB.
61.1716Dawgs spanked the Cards 32-0 with Mac at QBOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Aug 11 1995 15:402
61.1717oopsAKOCOA::BREENFri Aug 11 1995 15:591
    I stand corrected.  How's May doing?
61.1718ROCK::GRONOWSKISox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant!Fri Aug 11 1995 19:054
61.1719ROCK::GRONOWSKITribe owns Yanks... bye in playoffs if they meetTue Aug 15 1995 11:1418
61.1720line 2-1 on a HalShow todayCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Aug 15 1995 12:1013
    
     Hey Vinny how's your tummy??????????
    
     I don't know Paul, Bledsoe and Mirer both started as rookies, Zeier
     might too.
    
     I'm really going to have to hook up the radio to listen to monday
     nite games, the boys in the booth suck. I mean a guy completes a
     10 yard pass something an 8 year old can do for christsakes and these
     guys carry on like he just wrote "Great Expectations" or carried
     a 3.9 gpa for 4 years......
    
     mike
61.1721BIGQ::MCKAYTue Aug 15 1995 12:198
    Icemanus, how about Chicago having there training camp in 
    Milwaukee????
    
    Browns looked tremendous, Bears looked like the Hudson Pop Warner
    Bears.  I was singing Air Zeir's praises for years, I'm glad he's
    getting a good look......
    
    Jimbo
61.1722ROCK::GRONOWSKITribe owns Yanks... bye in playoffs if they meetTue Aug 15 1995 12:227
61.1723ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Aug 15 1995 12:268
    
    I don't know.
    
    I'm no longer convinced that Zeier _won't_ start, and am convinced
    that he _should_ start, at least for now.  He reminds me of a young
    Kosar, which is nice to see, and a _wonderful_ change from Testaverde.
    
    Joe
61.1724IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 15 1995 12:3523
>    I don't know who this Zeir guy is that Jimbo is talking mumbling
>    something about (haven't seen any of the praise in here), 

It's not a "who", it's a "what".  It's a big country in Africa... :-)

>    but
>    this guy Zeier who plays for the Browns will not start at QB
>    this year unless Vinnie goes down.  Browns have a solid shot at
>    the Super Bowl, but no body makes it with a rookie QB.

Having seen him in college and having watched him last night, if I were
a Browns fan, I'd *still* rather him at QB.  If there's a team that could
survive with a rookie QB, it's the Browns - good defense, strong running
attack.  A lot of rookie mistakes come in dissecting pass coverages - he
won't have to do that as much with a team that can run.

The guy was, what, 14-16 for 168, 1 TD passing, 1 TD rushing?  Even in 
preseason against the Bears, that's still eyeopening...

Zeier may not get them to the Super Bowl, but Testaverde *definitely* won't.
Might as well roll the bones on the guy with the talent...

Roland
61.1725"Athletic" without great tools, just a player...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Aug 15 1995 13:3110
    Zeier proved to me what he was made of in that game last year where
    Georgia came back from a big deficit in the second half to tie Auburn.
    He and those 'Dawgs were taking a pounding in the first half at the
    hands of a much superior team but didn't quit.  I didn't know if he had
    quite enough ability to be a real star in the NFL, but as opposed to a 
    Testaverde at least you know that there's a heart in that body...
    
    glenn
    
61.1726early ROYHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyTue Aug 15 1995 13:4114
>    ... He reminds me of a young
    Kosar, ...

Talk about danged with faint praise!

Seriously, Zeier is by far the bestest looking rookie thised year.

I predict that he'll give Vinny a_allergy in the butt from sitting on the
pine.

With Zeier at the QB, anything less than a_AFC crown would be
disappointing and, ipso facto, ipse dixit, ergo, a choke job, hence.

TTom
61.1727ODIXIE::ZOGRANReasonable summer ratesTue Aug 15 1995 14:0816
    As much as it hurts me to say it, I may be following the Cleveland
    bandwagon this year.  I tend to follow teams that have a person that I
    am familiar with (Terp QB's - Boomer with Cinci and the Jets, Reich
    with Buffalo and now the Panthers, O'Donnell with the Steelers).  Now
    with Zeier on the Dawgs I may have to follow the local boy (I'm no fan
    of GA but I can't pick up a paper or listen to the FAN withour hearing
    about him).  A caller on the FAN actually predicted a Cleveland SB win
    with Zeier at the helm (he also said that GA would win the MNC this
    year, so I guess he was hittin' the ol' distilled grain a little
    earlier than usual!).
    
    Dawgs play the Falcons this week.  Should be interesting, as you may
    more people rooing for Cleveland in the stands!  College loyalty tends
    to run deeper than pro team adoration around here.
    
    UMDan 
61.1728OLD1S::CADZILLA2What ever happened to Bob Steele?Tue Aug 15 1995 14:124
     re 1720
    
    
      They flew to Milwaukee for training camp.
61.1729BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Aug 15 1995 14:485

	Any chance we'll see a "Whoops, my mistake" from Groaner?

	Kevin
61.1730Deirdork is still a brainless twit!ROCK::GRONOWSKITribe owns Yanks... bye in playoffs if they meetTue Aug 15 1995 14:495
61.1731hope this helps...IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 15 1995 14:567
>    Dan Dierdork, proved why he was a dork when he commented that the
>    flight back to Milwaukee would be no fun if they continued their
>    poor play - this was in the first half.  Um Dan, Chicago is in
>    Illinois, not Milwaukee.

You were right about Dierdorf being a moron, but in this particular
case he was correct.
61.1732still a dorkHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyTue Aug 15 1995 14:585
>	Any chance we'll see a "Whoops, my mistake" from Groaner?

Just cause he missed this detail doesn't mean the Dierdork is not a dork.

TTom
61.1733BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Aug 15 1995 15:007

	Didn't NEED to, I was just wondering if'n you'd admit that you didn't
	know what you were talking about (assuming the Bears would be flying
	to Chicago instead going back to training camp).

Kevin
61.1734Dan's ok in my book, not great, but okBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Aug 15 1995 15:068

	By the way, I must really be in the minority because I think Dan's
	ok.  Monday night football is entertainment and sports.  Dan may be
	a little light on the technical analysis, but that's only part of why
	he's there.

	Kevin
61.1735amazingHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyTue Aug 15 1995 15:1526
I am continuously amazed at how bad most announcers are.

Dan is not the worst. In fack, I don't think he's even the worst on MNF.
Al Michaels wins hands. Michaels has no clue what is happening on the
field and feels obliged to remind us of that, over and over. And Frank
Gifford can barely keep up with who's actually playing. Not the players,
the teams.

And now, with this new season, we have Phil Simms. I heard of enough of
him on the ESPN pre-game lasted season to know to tune him out.

And of course, Simms is following in the grand tradition of Joe Theisman
who has a_uncanny way of talking long enought about any play so that he
missed the nexted one. And I feel confident, based on his comments, the
he never made a single mistake on the football field, ever. Yeah, Joe, so
many people think so much of you that none of your teammates visited you
after LT finished with your leg.

Locally, they hired some guy from Buffalo who obviously sucked up to
Panther GM Bill Polian. He's barely adequate about football, hardly a
basis for his selection as the color analyst. What's even more funny is
when he tries to do local sports like NASCAR, which he has obviously
never watched, and college basketball where one wonders if'n he knows
how many people are supposed to be on a team.

TTom
61.1736haw hawOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Aug 15 1995 15:425
61.1737hey, you, stay off've my bandwagonHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyTue Aug 15 1995 17:137
Hey, don't bad mouth my bandwagon.

Besides, you'll probably jump aboard about week 10 by which time Buddy
will have rooned the Cards for another season and there's no more Sir
Chuck or KJ fodder.

TTom
61.1738OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Aug 15 1995 19:461
61.1739amenHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyWed Aug 16 1995 17:229
Supposedly, Vinny is on the mend and he'll be back. Zaire will start
again thised week for Cleveburgh.

The word is, if'n there's no setbacks, Vinny will return for the game
agin the Cards on 8/25.

Let's all bow our haids and pray for setbacks.

TTom
61.1740no place for wimpsOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Aug 16 1995 18:142
61.1741ROCK::GRONOWSKITribe owns Yanks... bye in playoffs if they meetWed Aug 16 1995 23:089
61.1742The Browns are #1!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERThu Aug 17 1995 19:0171

***************************************************************************
    _/_/_/_/     _/_/_/  _/          _/          _/  _/_/_/_/    _/_/_/_/
    _/      _/  _/    _/  _/        _/_/        _/  _/      _/  _/
    _/      _/  _/    _/   _/      _/  _/      _/   _/          _/
    _/      _/  _/_/_/_/    _/    _/    _/    _/    _/           _/_/_/
    _/      _/  _/    _/     _/  _/      _/  _/     _/    _/_/         _/
    _/      _/  _/    _/      _/_/        _/_/      _/      _/         _/
    _/_/_/_/    _/    _/       _/          _/        _/_/_/_/   _/_/_/_/
***************************************************************************


			              ____/\
                                     /-    |
                            /-------/      |
	                    \/\/\/\/|      \
                                    /            
                            /\^^^^^^
                            \_______________

                            C L E V E L A N D
*****************************************************************************
    
    	Great game Monday by our beloved CLEVELAND BROWNS.  The running
    game looked great and the passing game was even better.  Now, is there
    a better receiving corps out there this year.....RISON, JACKSON &
    LANGHAM.  1 2 3 .  We're going to the big game this year!
    
    	Just a few side notes that I notice no one has said anything
    about...  Anyone notice Perry's replacement?  PUPUA!  And the guy
    gets Perry's number.  Think someone had something to do with that?
    Well, I do!
    
    	Prior to Mondays game I was watching ESPN's pre game show and I
    can't think of the guys name, but, Cleveland just signed this guy
    who says he was blackballed by the NFL last year because of his great
    hits.  From the story they tell, this guy played not last year, but
    the year before and was fined something like $10,000.00 for a couple
    of hits he made on receivers...neither really looked that bad to me.
    At the end of the year, he is waived and no one...I mean no one wanted
    to pick him up.  He says ... blackballed!  So does ESPN.  At any rate,
    Cleveland has just signed this guy for the league miminum of something
    like $360,000.00.  Looks like the replacement for Turner untill he 
    shows up for camp and signs a new contract.
    
    	Beware, THE DAWGS are healthy this year.
    
    	Vardell isn't expected to contribute to the team untill mid season.
    Look for White to fill in till Vardell is ready.  White(hair) didn't
    look too bad Monday either.  
    
    	Reports are that Modell is looking to the suburbs for a new
    stadium....???
    
    	Yes, Zeier does look good.  He appears to be a little short but
    the ENERGY he seems to bring to the team is what makes Testiturd look
    so bad.  Lets hope that infection in his leg ...... spreads!
    
    
    		HEHEHEHEHEHEH
    
    			I said spread!
    
    	At any rate...I have my tickets to the home opener...
    
    		The Pats sip!
    
    	Go Cleveland!
    
    		WOOF!
61.1743Get well quick VinnyCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Aug 17 1995 19:094
    
    Chuck Cecil is the guy Hal and 30K was the amount of the fine......
    
    mike
61.1744IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Thu Aug 17 1995 19:1010
>    	Prior to Mondays game I was watching ESPN's pre game show and I
>    can't think of the guys name, but, Cleveland just signed this guy
>    who says he was blackballed by the NFL last year because of his great
>    hits.  From the story they tell, this guy played not last year, but
>    the year before and was fined something like $10,000.00 for a couple
>    of hits he made on receivers...neither really looked that bad to me.

Amazingly enough, Hal, I understand what you're saying for once, and I
think the guy you're talking about is Chuck Cecil.  I think he got hosed
big-time...
61.1745I don't think so...USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Aug 17 1995 19:253
>                           -< Get well quick Vinny >-

Can Cle win with this guy at QB ?
61.1746ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planThu Aug 17 1995 20:382
61.1747OLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyolgistThu Aug 17 1995 20:423
    
    Because they have to play Pittsburg three times a year before they can
    get to the big dance.
61.1748forget man-to-man coverageOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Aug 17 1995 20:431
61.1749Vinny is a womanSUBPAC::SKALSKIThu Aug 17 1995 22:5410
    
    
    
    	Can't win with Vinny because he slipped and twisted his 
    
    	(insert favorite female part)!
    
    
    
    						Sharkski
61.1750ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planFri Aug 18 1995 10:527
61.1751CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Aug 18 1995 12:255
    
     It's like this Paul, see that rock over there??? Well that rock over
     there is smarter than Vinny..........
    
     mike
61.1752ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Aug 18 1995 12:4521
    
>    So Cleveland can't win with Vinnie, but no one has been able to give me
>    a reason why?
    
    OK...
    
    Here's why the Browns can't win (well, the Superbowl, at least) with
    Vinny at QB:
    
    Vinny Testaverde has about 1 good game for every four he plays.
    He also has about 2 bad games for every four he plays.
    
    In the playoffs, a bad game is almost certainly a loss; assume a
    good game = a win, and a neutral game is a 50-50 chance.
    
    That gives a 1.6% chance of three good games (thus a SB win), and
    a 1.4% chance of a combination of good & neutral games with all
    games being wins.  So it's not that they can't win with Vinny at
    QB, I guess - just that it's a 3 in 100 shot.
    
    Joe
61.1753IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Aug 18 1995 13:0719
>    So Cleveland can't win with Vinnie, but no one has been able to give me
>    a reason why?

Joe went with probabilities, I'll go with admittedly subjective observation.

Last year's playoff game against the Patriots was not only the best that I've
even seen him play, but also the first time that I've ever seen him play
decently in a crucial game.  (He is solely responsible for moving Shane Conlan
several spots up in the draft.)

His arm isn't what it used to be - he doesn't throw deep as well as he used to.
And even if it was still all there, he still doesn't make the smart choices on
passing plays that would allow him to fully utilize it.

I won't use the term "gutless" that others seem to use, because I have no
idea how I'd react if I had 300-pound guys coming to hit me, but he still
seems to get somewhat frazzled and rush things.

Do you consider these to be valid reasons?
61.1754Go Vinny! pleeez!HBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyFri Aug 18 1995 13:5211
>    So Cleveland can't win with Vinnie, but no one has been able to give me
>    a reason why?

Yours not to wonder why ...

Why is much less important than what, as it what has happened.

What has happened is that Vinny has not produced. Cleveland underachieved
with this guy at the helm.

TTom
61.1755Steeler's > 'SpotsPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Aug 18 1995 14:136
>    So Cleveland can't win with Vinnie, but no one has been able to give me
>    a reason why?
    
  Rod Woodson.

	Keith
61.1756AKEEM::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planFri Aug 18 1995 20:573
    
    What has Woodson done v.s. the Browns?
    
61.1757PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Aug 18 1995 22:1015
>    What has Woodson done v.s. the Browns?
    
  Woodson was a one man wrecking crew when the Men of Steel 
  flattened the girls from Clevescum 3 times lasted year. He had multiple 
  INTs of Vinnie's passes, sacked Vinnie and forced some fumbles. Vinnie
  wus so scared of Rod that he started throwin into double coverage on the
  other side and even Tim Mckyer picked him off. How many INTs did Vinnie
  throw against the Black n Gold last year ? Hint, if those games were 
  superbowls, Vinnie mightta broke John Elway's career superbowl INT record.

  There's 10 other good reason's why the Steeler's will pulverize the
  Brownies this year. They are: Greg Lloyd, Joel Steed, Kevin Green, 
  Chad Brown....well, you get the picture.

	Keith
61.1758PUSH::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planSat Aug 19 1995 11:243
    
    Has Woodson ever won an NFL championship?
    
61.1759my cents worthBSS::MENDEZMon Aug 21 1995 18:463
    no but McKyer has...
    
    
61.1760ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planTue Aug 22 1995 10:594
61.1761ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planTue Aug 22 1995 11:005
61.1762He's sooooo goodFABSIX::E_MAXWELLOh flight attendent!Wed Aug 23 1995 07:324
     Once again I must take my hat off to you groaner, You figured it out
    all by yourself.
    
                                                                 Lil Ed
61.1763ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planSun Aug 27 1995 12:0814
61.1764Zeier will be the starter by Nov.AD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsMon Aug 28 1995 11:3513
    
    
    
    
    re -.1
    
     (Bledsoe would be down to #3 on the Browns depth charts
    
       Paul.... I know your trying to bust peoples aggies but this is
    absolutely crazy.  With Bledsoe as the 'Spots QB they beat Pittsburgh
    last year and end up in the 'Bowl.
    
    Jerry
61.1765ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planMon Aug 28 1995 11:3911
61.1766Pname mano-manoAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsMon Aug 28 1995 15:535
    
    
    
      You willing to give me 17.  Not that the Pats are gonna need them.
    
61.1767ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planMon Aug 28 1995 16:504
61.1768OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Aug 28 1995 17:162
61.1769ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planMon Aug 28 1995 19:078
61.1770wantin to go no pointsAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsMon Aug 28 1995 19:1612
    
    
    
      Paul.....
    
      I will go even in a NY minute.  Your the one the talkin about a 17
    point blowout.  I just wanted to see if you where willing to back a
    claim like that up.  Only prediction I will make is that the 'Spot O
    isn't capable of putting up 30 points and thats what it will take to
    win.
    
    Jerry
61.1771ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planMon Aug 28 1995 19:473
61.1772don't assume too muchOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Aug 28 1995 19:492
61.1773MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Aug 29 1995 13:257
	Mike, 

	Is that what's called "hitting the nail on the head"?



	billl
61.1774ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planTue Aug 29 1995 15:0216
61.1775official bandwangoneerHBAHBA::HAASlifepath perturbanceTue Aug 29 1995 15:139
>    Browns will go 10-6 or 11-5.
>    Browns will win the AFC Central.
>    Browns will make it to the AFC Championship game.

And then?

I gotsta know. I got 'em to go all the way.

TTom
61.1776"Will I see you in January?"MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Aug 29 1995 15:2923
    Preseason predictions -
    
>    Browns will go 10-6 or 11-5.
	Probably right

>    Browns will win the AFC Central.
	wrong-o, see below

>    Browns will make it to the AFC Championship game.
	wrong again, see below

>    Ernest Hunter will surprise the league at RB.
	anything positive from a Browns offense would be a 
	suprise.

>    Pittsburgh will eek out a wild card bid.
	The Steelers will win the division walking away.
	The Browns will go down to the last week trying to 
	get the last available playoff spot, only to be beaten 
	in the wild card game, if they make it.
    

	billl
61.1777Pats will win by 10-12AD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsTue Aug 29 1995 15:4115
    
    
    
    
       Pats will beat the 'Spots on Sunday.  Take it to the bank.  It all
    came clear last night when that moron Chirs Mortenson pick the 'Spots
    for da 'bowl.  All I've heard was how Andre Rison is goin to light it
    up in the mistake by the lake but what the Dawg fans fail to relize is
    that unless BillB puts in Zeier as the starter now (I think he is
    better than Intecpetiverde now) he won't be seein much of the ball
    'cause Vinny ain't gonna get it to him.  Pittsburgh (as much as I
    dislike those guys) should and will romp through that pathetic div. 
    Only two teams will be over .500, Squeelers and 'Spots.
    
    Jerry
61.1778MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Aug 29 1995 15:525
	We'll see how 'pathetic' the division is when the Steelers
	woop the Pats on Dec 16.


	billl
61.1779CAMONE::WAYPick 'em up and strutTue Aug 29 1995 16:0310
Lots of folks have picked the Pats to win the AFC East.

I think they're a year, perhaps two, away from all that.  I see the Dolphins
winning the AFC East.

Browns/Steelers to me is a toss-up.   The Browns need a decent QB.  Vinny
will never take them to the promised land, IMO.


'Saw
61.1780destined to failOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Aug 29 1995 16:332
61.1781ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Aug 29 1995 17:226
    
> The Browns need a decent QB.
    
    They have one - Zeier.
    
    Joe
61.1782IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 29 1995 17:267
>> The Browns need a decent QB.
    
>    They have one - Zeier.

The problem here is that your name is not Bill Belichick.

Not that you necessarily want it to be...
61.1783SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Tue Aug 29 1995 17:417
    
    	From a Patriots fan, the Pats will start the season off 0-3. They
    will lose to Cleveland, Miami, and SF. Cleveland has a strong team
    on will win the Central Division. I see Miami and SF playing against
    each other in the Super Bowl. With Dan Marino finally geting a ring.
    
    Ron
61.1784my 2 centsBSS::MENDEZTue Aug 29 1995 19:237
    If the Browns have to rely on Zeier they will be in trouble.  Rarely
    will a rookie make it big in the NFL especially at QB.  Down the road
    Zeier could be a very good one.  Vinnie ought to be able to take the
    Browns to the playoffs and contend for the division.  It is speculative
    whether he has the talent to take them to the big dance.  Cleveland
    has a solid defense but QB is a BIG ?
    
61.1785ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planTue Aug 29 1995 20:214
61.1786ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planTue Aug 29 1995 20:252
61.1787OLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyologistTue Aug 29 1995 20:312
    
    How can they be a rookie in the second game? Must be Otto Graham
61.1788MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Aug 29 1995 20:507
Groaner,

name it, you got.



billl
61.1789Testaverde must still be a rookieOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Aug 29 1995 21:404
61.1790ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planTue Aug 29 1995 21:5610
61.1791duh!OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Aug 29 1995 22:294
61.1792ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planWed Aug 30 1995 01:549
61.1793True story....CAMONE::WAYPick 'em up and strutWed Aug 30 1995 13:0113
Hey, what's wrong with flash cards?

That's the way I learned some algebra, and quite a bit of chemistry.  I'd
make them up and then have my brother work with me on them.  He didn't
know sh*t from shinola about what I was doing, but he could tell if my 
answer was right.....


Flash cards rool!

8^)

'Saw
61.1794let the p-name wagers begin!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Aug 30 1995 13:5413
	Okay Groaner, it's time to put up or shutup.

	If'n (I mean 'When') the Steelers 'clinch' the division you must
	wear "I've always been a closet Steeler fan" until the Monday
	following the Super Bowl.

	If'n the Browns clinch (fat chance) I'll do the same.

	Knowing your traditional disappearing act happens as soon as
	the Browns are out of it, this shouldn't be too painful for you.


	billl
61.1795rookie definedOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Aug 30 1995 16:006
61.1796The case of the gullible professorAKOCOA::BREENWed Aug 30 1995 16:219
    'Saw,
    	In my high school chemistry the teacher had the table of elements
    on a pull-down chart above the blackboard - just sitting there.
    
    	Now it wasn't totally obvious how to use it and I'm not sure
    everyone caught on - I never told anyone - but...
    
    	Of course I didn't need it, I had all those valences and
    abbreviations etc memorized.
61.1797CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MWed Aug 30 1995 16:4419
>    	In my high school chemistry the teacher had the table of elements
>    on a pull-down chart above the blackboard - just sitting there.
>    
>    	Now it wasn't totally obvious how to use it and I'm not sure
>    everyone caught on - I never told anyone - but...

Yep, I remember those days.  I could never remember that Au was gold
until someone told me that Au was short for Aurum, the Latin word (supposedly)
for gold....

    
>    	Of course I didn't need it, I had all those valences and
>    abbreviations etc memorized.

Good for you.  I just memorized the regular ones I needed for class....


'Saw

61.1798MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Aug 30 1995 17:087
	Hard to belive I haven't heard back from Groaner on that p-name wager.

	He must either be busy, or he's lost his cajones.



	billl
61.1799noting by proxyMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Aug 30 1995 19:5811
	Testicleverde/Belicheck/Modell factor will allow the Brownspots
	to finish no better than 9-7, with an outside chance at 10-6.

	Meanwhile the STEELERS will finish no worse than 11-5.

	Look for the 'spots to loose three more games to the STEELERS.


	Ya heerd it here firsted!
	
	JaKe
61.1800OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Aug 30 1995 20:062
61.1801WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNUMBER 3 LOOMS OVER FENWAYWed Aug 30 1995 20:095
    
    
    Plus 2 from Cincy they are already 6-0.
    
       If they don't go 12-4 its a choke!
61.1802OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Aug 30 1995 20:242
61.1803Okay, i'm inROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planWed Aug 30 1995 20:3620
61.1804??BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Aug 30 1995 21:3926
   <<< Note 61.1794 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Some gave all..." >>>
>                       -< let the p-name wagers begin! >-
>
>	Okay Groaner, it's time to put up or shutup.
>
>	If'n (I mean 'When') the Steelers 'clinch' the division you must
>	wear "I've always been a closet Steeler fan" until the Monday
>	following the Super Bowl.
>
>	If'n the Browns clinch (fat chance) I'll do the same.
>
>	Knowing your traditional disappearing act happens as soon as
>	the Browns are out of it, this shouldn't be too painful for you.
>
>
>	billl

	Billl,

	Does this mean that if'n the Browns clinch, you'll sport a P name of
	"I've always been a closet Steeler fan"?  I'd say strict interpretation
	of your words suggests that.  You wouldn't be trying something funny 
	here now would you?

	Kevin

61.1805MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Thu Aug 31 1995 13:1411
	Kevin,
	
	I ain't no Clevescumite!  I would never do something as
	dastardly as that.   ;^)

	I actually noticed that after I posted it, but knew there
	was no way I could stand the abuse I would take in here
	if I was to welch on the intent of a p-name bet.


	billl
61.1806BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredThu Aug 31 1995 14:145

	Jest checkin'....

	Kevin
61.1807Pats 96 SB ChampsFABSIX::K_JOHNSONTue Sep 05 1995 03:129
        Now that the Brownies lost to a good team,now they can beat 
    up on that hopeless division (except Pitts.).Bownies are #1.....
    
    
    
     Ha Ha What a Choke!!
    
    
                                  
61.1808NE favored to win and they wonROCK::GRONOWSKIPats rule Browns!Tue Sep 05 1995 10:524
61.1809someone call the net-police!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Sep 05 1995 12:487
	Someone must have broken into Groaner's account.  No way he'd be 
	posting in here so soon after being beaten by a 'mediocoe' team
	like the Pats.



	billl
61.1810ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats rule Browns!Tue Sep 05 1995 14:195
61.1811MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Sep 05 1995 14:438
    >>If the Browns were in NE's division, they'd probably be in first place right now.

	Nice Hal-ism there, Groaner.  If the Browns were in the Pat's division,
	they'd be in LAST place there, too.



	billl
61.1812CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MTue Sep 05 1995 15:413
This note stream is kind of like reading one of the "formula" novels.

You know how it's going to go even before you open the book....
61.1813OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Sep 05 1995 16:167
61.1814OLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyologistTue Sep 05 1995 16:234
    
     If it's the best division in the league. Why haven't they won a SB
    since 1974?
    
61.1815duhOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Sep 05 1995 16:251
61.1816duh duhOLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyologistTue Sep 05 1995 16:453
    
    
    I should have known another heiserism
61.1817ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats rule Browns!Tue Sep 05 1995 19:445
61.1818IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Sep 05 1995 19:498
Groaner,

What was the game you played to simulate the Browns/Pats game?  Was it a
video game, or was it a statistical game with room for variance like 
Strat-O-Matic?  It came out pretty close to the real thing.

Roland

61.1819pats win??OLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyologistTue Sep 05 1995 19:571
    
61.1820IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Sep 05 1995 20:015
Not sure where his original note was, but Paul played two games before
Sunday - one was a 17-16 Cleveland win, but after he discovered he'd played
it at Cleveland, he re-ran it, and ended up with a 17-17 tie.  Considering
that the final score was 17-14, it wasn't off by much.
61.1821Yea like the Dolts are for realAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsTue Sep 05 1995 20:0110
    
    
    
      Paul...
    
      I'll agree that the Brown have played the toughest schedule in the
    NFL so far but the AFC central is a laughing stock.  Two very good
    teams and a bunch of panzies.  
    
    Jerry
61.1822DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Tue Sep 05 1995 20:027
    
      The Browns are in the strongest dvision in the AFC right now?
      C'mon, Paul. After Cleveland and Pittsburg, two very good teams,
      you have Cinci, Houston and Jacksonville. I'd say that the west
      with Denver, KC, Oakland, San Diego and Seattle kicks the Central's
      butt and the East with NE, Miami and Buffalo is a little bit behind 
      them. The AFC Central is the *weakest* division in the AFC.
61.1823OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Sep 05 1995 20:051
61.1824Huh?BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Sep 05 1995 20:0714
>           <<< Note 61.1817 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "Pats rule Browns!" >>>
>
>    
>    Two key things to remember about the Browns loss and their division:
>    
>    1. The Browns are in the strongest division in the AFC right now.
>
>    2. The Browns played a much tougher schedule than the Pats so far.

	What are  you talking about in point 2?  The Pats are a tougher oppenent
	than the Browns?  Or are you talking about the meaningless pre-season
	schedule?

	Kevin
61.1825SNAX::ERICKSONWhen will the Tribe Choke?Tue Sep 05 1995 20:094
    
    	Groaners P-Name speaks for all of his crap.
    
    Ron
61.1826IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Sep 05 1995 20:1110
>>    2. The Browns played a much tougher schedule than the Pats so far.

>	What are  you talking about in point 2?  The Pats are a tougher oppenent
>	than the Browns?  Or are you talking about the meaningless pre-season
>	schedule?

It's a semantics game.  At this point, the Browns' opponents have a combined
record of 1-0, while the Patriots' opponents have a combined record of 0-1.
The "so far" enables him to tie the statement exclusively to the week 1
results so he can flip-flop later on as he needs to.
61.1827I'll stop scratching my haid nowBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Sep 05 1995 20:257

	Gotcha.  I have a feeling this is going to be a long season.  Let's
	hope that, as the Browns fade, we don't get a plethora of "Have the
	<insert some team that's not from Cleveland> ever won .....?"

	Kevin
61.1828ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats rule Browns!Tue Sep 05 1995 21:173
61.1829OLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyologistTue Sep 05 1995 21:2315
    
    Tied with the afc west.
    
    
    	win 					lose
    
    Oakland Denver KC				Settle San Diego
    Pitt Cincinn Hou				Cleveland Jackson
    Miami Ne					NyJet Indy Buffalo
    
    
    Dallas Washington 				Philly NyGiants Cards
    Chicago Tampa				Minn Detroit Green Bay
    San Fran St.Louis Atlanta			New Orleans Carolina
                                                                    
61.1830ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats rule Browns!Tue Sep 05 1995 23:382
61.1831Groaner,Groaner,GroanerFABSIX::K_JOHNSONWed Sep 06 1995 02:3629
               Hey Groaner can't reply like I want to I'm on a crazy 
    shift.If you even think that the central is the strongest division
    in football its time to put the prescription away and hand over the
    vodka.C'mon you were bragging about your big bad Brownies,how they
    were gonna beat the pats and their 4string QB in Bledsoe.It maybe 
    just one game ,but after reading all the times you put the PATS
    down,I for one find great satisfaction when you are DEAD WRONG!
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                 PS Groaner,
    
                                               I like the comment in the
                                               sox note it was cute.
                                               But I would bettcha
                                               you would rethink
                                               the" little" comment 
                                               if I were to be 
                                               standing next to you. 
                                
                                                I like you groaner
                                               your like that aunt
                                               that you don't want
                                               to invite over your
                                               house for Christmas.
                                                                   
61.1832OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Sep 06 1995 02:491
61.1833SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 06 1995 12:128
RE           <<< Note 61.1817 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "Pats rule Browns!" >>>

>    2. The Browns played a much tougher schedule than the Pats so far.

  I agree with you here. The Browns played the Pats which is a much better
team than the Pats played.

  George
61.1834WMGEN1::abs004p7.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYWed Sep 06 1995 15:573
>It's a semantics game.

Gtoaaner and meaningless semantics.  Who'da thunk it?  
61.1835SAME OLD NOISEBSS::HUNTERThu Sep 07 1995 15:276
Well,  I've been out of this conference for years now and it seems that this Browns
note hasn't changed a bit...

 Oh well, nice efforts against the Pats any how...  ;^)

	Big Game
61.1836CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MThu Sep 07 1995 15:5811
>	Big Game


Hey, Big Game, long time no note.

You ever hear from Mike JN?  Is he still alive?  Is he still kickin' around
out there?


'Saw

61.1837ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats trounce Browns in high school stadiumThu Sep 07 1995 16:584
61.1838GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Thu Sep 07 1995 18:224
    
    	It took a little coaxing but I see Cactus Jack has returned!
    
    	Claybone
61.1839Mike JN Alive & WellBSS::HUNTERThu Sep 07 1995 19:4512
 'Saw...  Great to note ya again...  Life @ CXO has been very busy the last few years 
but rewarding as well.  Business is going well in the storage group and it's great to
be working for the company on the upswing as apposed to the stuff we were all dealing
with years gone by...

 At any rate,  I saw the Junk Noter not to long ago and he's doing great.  He is back
working in his field again and having a good go at it.  

 Hey...  How about them Clowns...  Looks like the Pats get to do the Bronco on 'em 
this year !!   HA HA HA  !!!

	Big Game
61.1840Groaner !!! Buddy it's great to see you're still in LA LA Land !!BSS::HUNTERThu Sep 07 1995 19:494
  Groaner...  Bet ya a buck (the on I still have hanging framed in my office) that the 
donks finish with a better record that the Clowns.

		Big Game
61.1841ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats trounce Browns in high school stadiumThu Sep 07 1995 20:032
61.1842ROCK::GRONOWSKISox swept by Yankees again!Mon Sep 11 1995 11:112
61.1843ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Sep 11 1995 12:043
  Too bad they've got the Browns dragging them down.

  George
61.1844JaKe made ne say it....MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Sep 12 1995 20:288
	quick question for Hal and Groaner....

	How's it feel to be two games into the season and looking UP to
	see the Bengals?



	billl
61.1845ROCK::GRONOWSKISox swept by Yankees again!Tue Sep 12 1995 20:354
61.1846ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allSun Sep 24 1995 22:445
61.1847CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Sep 25 1995 12:009
Well, I'm no Pittsburgh fan, but looking at this objectively, it's a long
season.  Cleveland could sustain a couple of key injuries like Pittsburgh has
and before you know it, Houston could be in first place.


Course, that's must my opinion....


'Saw
61.1848pats will never make it to the bowl with drewROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allMon Sep 25 1995 14:122
61.1849CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Sep 25 1995 14:277
>    
>    Vinnie 8 TDs, 1 INT #1 rated QB in the AFC... how's Drew doing?
>

I dunno.  They didn't play this week.  You'd have to ask a Pats fan to
get a meaningful answer to that one though.....

61.1850CSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Mon Sep 25 1995 17:011
    Drew's team beat the #1 team in the AFC Central. 
61.1851ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allMon Sep 25 1995 17:113
61.1852ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allTue Oct 03 1995 12:592
61.1853ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Oct 03 1995 13:084
    
    Well, Testaverde, Beliupchuck, and apparently Crosby, at least...
    
    Joe
61.1854ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allTue Oct 03 1995 13:168
61.1855What was Belichek thinking???TNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasTue Oct 03 1995 13:3111
    WHY THE HECK DID BELICHEK LET THE CLOCK RUN DOWN TO 8 SECONDS BEFORE
    THE BUFFALO FG TO WIN IT??????  THAT MADE NO SENSE!!!!!!  HE LET OVER
    30 SECONDS RUN OFF THE CLOCK, TAKING AWAY HIS TEAM'S CHANCE TO TIE
    OR WIN THE GAME.  WHAT AN IDIOT!!!!!!
    
    There, I feel better.  And I'm not even a Browns fan.  I just hate
    stupid coaching decisions, and using your timeouts there was a
    no-brainer.  And the Browns returning the kick to near midfield made
    the decision look even worse.
    
    NAZZ
61.1856SNAX::ERICKSONRed Sox - 1995 AL East ChampsTue Oct 03 1995 13:5514
    
    	Nazz,
    
    		He let the clock run down because it didn't matter. The
    Browns had only 2 timeouts. Even if the Browns called the 2 time outs.
    Which would have been 2nd and 3rd down. The Bills let the clock run
    down to 8 seconds on 4th down. Then go ahead and kick the field goal.
    	Belichick is probably second guessing calling the timeout at
    8 seconds. The play continued and Christie missed left. Goes to show
    you that icing the kicker. Can work both ways, it gave him time to
    clear up his head.
    
    Ron
    
61.1857Makes more sense nowTNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasTue Oct 03 1995 16:154
    I thought the play they ran was second down, and the two TOs would have
    set up a 4th down kick.  Sorry.
    
    NAZZ
61.1858MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Oct 03 1995 16:422
    
      So much for the Browns and the best division in football.
61.1859MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Oct 03 1995 17:016
re .1852:          Browns sip!

	But then the rest of us knew that...


	billl
61.1860ROCK::GRONOWSKIYear 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996Sun Oct 08 1995 16:213
61.1861PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Oct 09 1995 15:196
>    Close this note down, Art's moving the team to LA because he couldn't
>    blackmail the city into building him a new stadium.

  *&^% Model !@#$ Model jerk Model %^&*$%#@! creep Model.

	Keith
61.1862Hal got Art's word on thisEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 09 1995 17:2110
    
>    Close this note down, Art's moving the team to LA because he couldn't
>    blackmail the city into building him a new stadium.
    
    Waitaminute, what about those personal promises Modell made to 
    Hal?  Pretty sure that one of them was that _Cleveland_ would be
    in the Super Bowl by next year...
    
    glenn
    
61.1863ROCK::GRONOWSKIYear 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996Mon Oct 09 1995 17:232
61.1864SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 09 1995 17:256
  Are you sure this just isn't some form of blackmail by the Browns to get a
new stadium? 

  Seems they draw fairly well in Cleveland.

  George
61.1865ROCK::GRONOWSKIYear 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996Mon Oct 09 1995 17:354
61.1866MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 09 1995 17:5012
>  Are you sure this just isn't some form of blackmail by the Browns to get a
>new stadium? 
>
>  Seems they draw fairly well in Cleveland.
>
>  George


   George, it seems the NFL may have franchises in places where they don't
   belong, and the NFL is progressive enough to let owners move to where they
   can make the most money.  Seems to be just the set-up you've been clamoring
   for.
61.1867MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Oct 09 1995 18:1510

  >> and the NFL is progressive enough to let owners move to where they
  >> can make the most money.  

     Not really. They learned the hard way that there's nothing they can 
     do stop 'em when they lost in court to Al Davis. If they had their
     druthers, they'd want to have kept the Rams in LA and the Browns
     in Cleveland.
    
61.1868MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Oct 10 1995 16:279
>     Not really. They learned the hard way that there's nothing they can 
>     do stop 'em when they lost in court to Al Davis. If they had their
>     druthers, they'd want to have kept the Rams in LA and the Browns
>     in Cleveland.

      Well, they may not be progressive on their own volition, but they
      do fit the franchise-uprooting scenario George has seemed to advocate
      for baseball.    

61.1869ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Oct 22 1995 19:345
61.1870IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Mon Oct 23 1995 11:222
I take it Jacksonville held onto their lead yesterday?
61.1871or should that read Cleveland lost 23-15ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 23 1995 11:292
61.1872ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Oct 23 1995 12:238
    
    I said it before the season began; I'll say it again now...
    
    1) Fire Bellichek
    
    2) Fire Vinny
    
    Joe
61.1873MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 23 1995 12:3211
>    I said it before the season began; I'll say it again now...
>    
>    1) Fire Bellichek
>    
>    2) Fire Vinny
>    
>    Joe


     These things aren't going to make the team any better; and, they could
     hurt the team's chances of staying in Cleveland.
61.1874ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 23 1995 12:352
61.1875IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Mon Oct 23 1995 12:516
Paul,

If they do this (move to LA), will they then continue to follow the Rams
and move to St. Louis in a few years?

Roland
61.1876ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Oct 23 1995 14:139
    
    To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure firing Bellichek & Vinny
    would in any way change the Browns chance of moving...
    
    Joe
    
    BTW - for the Browns to do it right, they'd have to win the
    Super Bowl this year, move to LA next year, and then on to 
    Saint Louis in 2045...
61.1877IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Mon Oct 23 1995 14:515
>    BTW - for the Browns to do it right, they'd have to win the
>    Super Bowl this year, move to LA next year, and then on to 
>    Saint Louis in 2045...

Oh good, at least someone knew what the h*ll I was talking about... :-)
61.1878WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityMon Oct 23 1995 14:543
    
    
        Didn't know they had Super Bowls 47 years ago.
61.1879MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Oct 23 1995 15:0620

     Two teams, the Raiders and the Rams, leave LA because of
    poor fan support, poor facilities and plain greed and Modell
    wants to bring the mediocre Browns in? That's some kind of
    threat? To take them somewhere where pro football is met
    with general apathy? If I were a Clevelander I wouldn't worry. 
    If he threatened to take them to some wannabe-a-big-league town 
    like Nashville where they're rubes enough and desperate enough
    to throw money and facilities at even a poor team like the
    Browns then I'd be concerned. But as he's threatening to 
    leave some of the best fans in the NFL for a town where
    historically they've shown a disinterest in football, I'd
    laugh in his face.
    
    
    BTW - was Jacobs Field built with public money?

    
    
61.1880OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Oct 23 1995 15:1214
61.1881Most likely blackmail but threat is realAKOCOA::BREENMon Oct 23 1995 15:1513
    Regardless of media portrayal of various owners as sportsmen or even
    human beings, the motive of all of them is pure greed.  The purpose of
    the cap was to not have to share non-gate,non-tv money with labor and
    one of the prime sources is the freebies connected with a move.
    
    The other trick of course is to hold up the municipality with the
    threat of a move.  That said move doesn't make sense in normal, human
    fiscal terms is irrevelant - It can put money into a Modell's pocket
    and thus has to be taken as a serious incentive.
    
    Cleveland fans hasve been nothing short of a tremendous thruout the
    history of the Browns and it would be trajedy for them to lose that
    team.
61.1882ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Oct 23 1995 15:417
    
>    BTW - was Jacobs Field built with public money?
    
    Not completely, but there was significant public money involved,
    in large part through a sin tax.
    
    Joe
61.1883I'd worryEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 23 1995 16:3925
      
>    Two teams, the Raiders and the Rams, leave LA because of
>    poor fan support, poor facilities and plain greed and Modell
>    wants to bring the mediocre Browns in? That's some kind of
>    threat? To take them somewhere where pro football is met
>    with general apathy? If I were a Clevelander I wouldn't worry. 
    
    You're forgetting about the TV money, Tommy.  The Los Angeles
    market can't be ignored and the NFL won't allow it to be.  The 
    owners that abandoned LA, Davis and Frontiere, were a couple of
    loose cannons (looser than Modell, even) and they only left 
    after they couldn't pry loose sufficient blackmail.  Once the
    bluff is met and the cow is out of the barn the situation 
    changes, though, such as happened in St Louis (ohmygod we don't 
    have a team anymore!).  The stakes are much higher here.  Equal 
    TV revenue sharing caused a financial "paradox" in what was best 
    for all (the NFL) was not necessarily best for one.  The NFL and
    the TV networks, being for-profit ventures, will fix this paradox, 
    one way or the other.  The NFL will find a way to offer up a 
    sufficient bribe to get someone into LA, even if the stands are 
    virtually empty, even if the team stinks, even if the franchise 
    is the Browns.
    
    glenn
    
61.1884SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 23 1995 16:507
  Wouldn't it make more sense for someone like the Colts or Packers to move to
L.A?

  Or one of those new teams, are Jacksonville and Charlette really better
pro football towns than Cleveland?

  George
61.1885MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Oct 23 1995 17:0715
    
   >> You're forgetting about the TV money, Tommy.  The Los Angeles
   >> market can't be ignored and the NFL won't allow it to be.  

      If the NFL gives Modell anything they did not give or offer to Al 
      Davis, Al will end up getting that times three via treble damages.
      I realize that the NFL desperately wants a franchise in the 2nd
      largest market in the country. But given that Davis moved out be-
      cause LA Coliseum wasn't financially viable and they're set to go
      to court with Jerry Jones because of his maverick deals, I don't 
      see them giving Modell a thing especially when measured by attendance
      and fan support, he has a successful franchise right where he is.

    
    
61.1886MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Oct 23 1995 17:114
    
    re .1884
    
    No. And no.
61.1887MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Oct 24 1995 11:345
>   Wouldn't it make more sense for someone like the Colts or Packers to move to
> L.A?

  So far as Green Bay is concerned, it is a publicly owned franchise.  Do you
  think the people of Green Bay, as a group, are going to send their franchise to LA ?
61.1888CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Oct 24 1995 12:278
I response to an earlier question, no, no expansion team has won a division
title in its first year.

Jacksonville can set a record for most wins in a season by an expansion team if 
they win one more game (4).


'Saw
61.1889Send the Packers Pack'enSLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Oct 24 1995 12:489
RE                     <<< Note 61.1887 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

>  So far as Green Bay is concerned, it is a publicly owned franchise.  Do you  
>think the people of Green Bay, as a group, are going to send their franchise to
>LA ? 

  I don't know, the way they've been playing since Limbardi left ... ?

  George
61.1890Green Bay pretty strong right about nowAKOCOA::BREENTue Oct 24 1995 12:565
    Better take another look, George.  GreenBay is 5-2 and looks like about
    the 4th or 5th best team in football and one of the few that could
    realistically contend with the big two, head to head. Yeh, I know they
    got skunked in Dallas and lost there in playoffs but they'll get
    another chance.
61.1891CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Oct 24 1995 13:099
In addition, Green Bay just starting playing all of their home games back in
Green Bay.  Two or three a year were being played in Milwaukee.

Green Bay fans are a hearty breed, have been for years, and I don't see that
franchise going any place where you can see the game in shirtsleeves in
December....


'Saw
61.1892ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 24 1995 14:564
61.1893Speaking of BC - ughAKOCOA::BREENTue Oct 24 1995 15:386
    Favre's been hitting Steve Chmura, a BC guy, a lot lately.  I'm not
    sure about Jackson coming in and being the best thing for that Packer
    team.
    
    This will be the test of that chemistry factor and whether it means
    anything.
61.1894SALEM::DODAThe halfway house that Ruth builtTue Oct 24 1995 15:427
Jackson is an over-rated whiner who couldn't throw a decent block 
if his life depended on it. Chmura has been doing a great job.

Beats me why GB wanted Jackson in camp so badly especially after 
they've seen what Chmura has been able to do.

daryll
61.1895a dawg daySUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Oct 25 1995 16:439
    
    	The problem with the Browns are injuries....with Turner and
    Langham playing hurt, you get burned.  I don't think the Browns coaches
    have alot of confidence in the backups.  That better change.
    
    	Vinnie is out!  Bring on the Rookie!
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.1896Come on baby lite my Zier?AD::HEATHTribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sportsWed Oct 25 1995 18:317
    
    
       The Browns will be a much better team with Zier at QB than Vinnie. 
    With the Steelers all banged up and Cinci playing out of their minds
    look for the 'spots to take the central with a 9-7 record.
    
    Jerry
61.1897CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearThu Oct 26 1995 11:593
I haven't seen much sports news lately.

Why is Vinnie out?  Is he injured, or is it just because he sucks pond water?
61.1898ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Oct 26 1995 12:0213
    
    Actually, it's more that Belichek sucks pond water.
    
    Vinny, incredibly, has been playing _well_.  Not great, but
    surprisingly OK.
    
    But, because the Belichek & staff are idiots, and therefore the
    Browns are losing, Vinny is being benched.
    
    Don't get me wrong - I'm sure Zeier's a better QB anyway - but it's
    the coaching staff that really needs to be benched.
    
    Joe
61.1899CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearThu Oct 26 1995 12:043
Oh, okay.  I see.

Well, the kid did look good in preseason.....
61.1900SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Oct 26 1995 13:597
    
    Its the injuries I tell ya......two big ones on defense and two/three
    on offense.....Jackson/Langham/Rison     Turner/Alexander
    
    WOOF
    
    
61.1901Hardly Vinnie's fault for that!TNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasThu Oct 26 1995 14:005
    Saw a graphic on Sportcenter - in the first four games, Browns defense
    gave up only 11 ppg; in the last three (all losses), they've given up
    28 ppg.
    
    NAZZ
61.1902Sounds like a $money decision to meAKOCOA::BREENThu Oct 26 1995 16:481
    
61.1903more cashSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Oct 26 1995 17:017
    
    	May be right...suposably Rico Smith got a big bonus because of the 
    six catches he made last week.  Ole Art may have gotten pissed at
    Vinnie for making him pay out the bucks..
    
    WOOF
    
61.1904ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Oct 30 1995 15:586
    
    Good news...
    
    Bellichek's in trouble w/ Modell...
    
    Joe
61.1905OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Oct 30 1995 17:451
61.1906Baltimore Browns?BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredFri Nov 03 1995 13:466

	I thought the Browns were going to LA.  Now I hear Baltimore.  What's
	the scoop?

	Kevin
61.1907OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Nov 03 1995 13:492
61.1908Modell is a disgraceTNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasMon Nov 06 1995 13:2519
    Nice of Modell to show his true colors and not show up for the Browns
    game yesterday.  Zeier showed why he was a 3rd round pick and why
    Georgia never won anything.  Fans were in an ugly mood.  If I were a
    Browns season ticket holder, I would be in an ugly mood, too.
    
    Modell is supposedly getting a $50 million "enticement" fee just to
    move his team.  Then he will get all the revenues from all the luxury
    boxes at the new stadium, where the Browns will play rent-free.  Sounds
    like a great deal, but I never want to hear the word "loyalty" ever
    come out of that man's mouth again.
    
    And it also brings up the question - How much money is enough?  What
    the hell is the old man gonna do with the extra $50 million?
    
    Cleveland always sold out that old mausoleum, always posted the top TV
    ratings numbers, and were perhaps the best fans in the NFL.  And Modell
    says "See ya."  Just because he couldn't get luxury boxes????
    
    NAZZ
61.1909If the Browns move to Baltimore, will they be the Colts? Or will Baltimore change its name?IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Mon Nov 06 1995 13:333
Actually, I'm surprised we haven't heard more from Paul G., Hal, and Joe
Huber about this.  I'd be pretty frosted - the Browns fans have been nothing
if not loyal - I don't know what else could be asked of them...
61.1910Going once, twiceODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsMon Nov 06 1995 13:4011
    Just the latest in the "Which team(owner) is the biggest prostitute?"
    saga.  At this rate teams could be on the move every couple of years,
    going to cities trying to become a "big league city" or regain that
    "status".  Fan loyalty means nada.
    
    And folks wonder why college football and basketball continue to
    attract the fans better than their pro counterparts.
    
    IMHO
    
    UMDan  
61.1911Let's send in Levinson to investigate this homicide...EDWIN::WAUGAMANIf you're traveling back to GeorgiaMon Nov 06 1995 15:0217
    
    This move, if it happens, might be the biggest outrage in the history
    of professional sport.  Even the Brooklyn Dodgers weren't as well
    supported as the Cleveland Browns are.
    
    And where's Baltimore getting all the money?  Granted, Camden Yards 
    is beautiful and would have been profitable in its own right had it
    been privately financed, but it was billed and sold to the public as
    the centerpiece to the Inner Harbor which economically is a (relative)
    failure.  Baltimore is still Baltimore and while certain sections 
    (_real_ sections of the old city, like Fells Point) retain their charm,
    on the whole it ain't pretty.  It's not even close to a Boston and 
    never will be.  A beautification program involving the import of Art
    Modell and the Browns is doomed to failure...
    
    glenn
    
61.1912CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Nov 06 1995 15:0518
>          -< Let's send in Levinson to investigate this homicide... >-

Great season so far for Levinson....IMO.

    
>    This move, if it happens, might be the biggest outrage in the history
>    of professional sport.  Even the Brooklyn Dodgers weren't as well
>    supported as the Cleveland Browns are.
    
I'm surprised, to say the least.

But Old Art, old Looney Art, has the city by the short hairs and there ain't no
way they can stop him.

He's shufflin' off to Baltimore....


'Saw
61.1913MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Nov 06 1995 15:1124
    
      What Modell is doing to Browns fans is so foul that none
     of us can even bring ourselves to even rag Groaner about 
     it because it ain't funny. No fans deserve this especially 
     not fans as loyal and hardcore as Cleveland fans. If it can 
     happen there, it can happen anywhere. I knew that the Browns 
     weren't going to LA. Towns like LA don't need an NFL franchise 
     to feel big league. It's the nouveau riche 'burgs in the sunbelt 
     or second-tier cities like Baltimore that will pay almost any price 
     to try and hang with the big boys. This is also why I said that 
     Tagliabue is full of it when he says that deals like Jerry's Nike 
     deal will entice more teams to move. If anything the Nike deal is 
     an enticement to stay right where the hell you are. Tagliabue, it's 
     the DALLAS Cowboys. It's the CLEVELAND Browns. If you can build and
     succesfully market your team why move? You've essentially created a 
     brand name with strong name recognition so you don't need to move
     for the big dough. Not that Modell *needs* to move. This is a big
     cash grab plain and simple. There's no debt service because he owns
     the team outright. He has had sellouts for as long as anyone can 
     remember and the teams local tv ratings are among the best in the 
     league. Art's sole motivation is pure greed. My only question is
     where are the pro-owner guys like Joe Garbarino and Darryl Doda
     when these things happen?
61.1914SALEM::DODACelts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailableMon Nov 06 1995 15:2019
         <<< Note 61.1913 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
    > My only question is
    > where are the pro-owner guys like Joe Garbarino and Darryl Doda
    > when these things happen?

    Oh please. Do I sense a fixation problem or what?

    What Modell is doing is an outrage. I'm the one that called 
    for revenue sharing and all that in MLB just to stop this sort of 
    crap. I'm an NOT the one that supported Jimmah money-grabbing 
    in Dallas. This is the end result of that. So why are you 
    complaining? On one hand you applaud Jimmah's greed and then 
    you moan when other owners resort to these type of deals in order 
    to keep up and remain competetive. Stop talking out of both side 
    of your mouth.

    Sheesh.

    daryll
61.1915MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Nov 06 1995 15:4725
    
  >> On one hand you applaud Jimmah's greed and then you moan when other 
  >> owners resort to these type of deals in order to keep up and remain 
  >> competetive.

     When you say "Jimmah" I assume you mean "Jerrah" as in Jerry Jones, 
     the owner of the Cowboys. I don't necessarily "applaud his greed"
     but I find him building and marketing a successful franchise prefer-
     able to Modell's method of generating revenue. Any idiot can do what
     Modell's doing by spitting in the faces of Cleveland Browns fans. 
     Jones could have done it. Instead, Jones has pretty much ensured that
     the Cowboys will be the *Dallas* Cowboys for as long as he owns them.
     The Nashville Cowboys? I don't think so. Jerry's move didn't lead to
     Modell's move. Modell like Irsay, Frontiere and Davis plotted their
     moves long before Jerry ever announced his Nike deal. You honestly
     think that Modell is doing this to keep the Browns "competitive"?
     Really? As for my "fixation", I just find it just a little curious that 
     when Frank Thomas gripes about moving bp we're led to believe that he's 
     public enemy number one and doesn't care about the fans. But Modell pulls 
     one of the most heinous moves ever and we hear nary a peep. Modell's 
     move shows just how transparent these little fan appreciation moves are. 
     Moves, btw, that the owners never made when revenues were flowing in and 
     the owners appreciated that and not much else. This move isn't about
     remaining competitive. It's about pure greed.
    
61.1916MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonMon Nov 06 1995 15:5813
>     public enemy number one and doesn't care about the fans. But Modell pulls 
>     one of the most heinous moves ever and we hear nary a peep. Modell's 
>     move shows just how transparent these little fan appreciation moves are. 
>     Moves, btw, that the owners never made when revenues were flowing in and 
>     the owners appreciated that and not much else. This move isn't about
>     remaining competitive. It's about pure greed.

      Tommy,
          I think even the most anti-player union people in here would say
      that Modell's move is about as bad as an owner can get.  OTOH, that
      doesn't mean we suddenly start thinking the players are pure and virtuous.
      Hardly.

61.1917Perhaps I should've logged in from home yesterdaySALEM::DODACelts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailableMon Nov 06 1995 16:0214
Greed is greed. I believe that one has led to the other. You can 
choose to believe whatever you prefer.
The full force money-grabbing has begun and Jones started it. I'd 
guess that the Browns do not have the same resourced to generate 
the type of revenue that Jones has the opportunity for. Modell 
chose this method in order to remain competitive. I don't support 
either move.

Oh, and do let me know what my time period is for getting in here 
after every such move before I'm lambasted for remaining silent.

I'll add it to my daily calendar.

daryll
61.1918CSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Mon Nov 06 1995 16:0411
       >What Modell is doing is an outrage. I'm the one that called
       >for revenue sharing and all that in MLB just to stop this sort of
       >crap. 
    
    Excuse me but the NFL has revenue sharing, a salary cap and
    everything else you wanted in MLB. This is why there are few good guys
    in sports today. Everyone is in it for the money pure and simple.
    Forget loyalty. That's why the past few years I watch more and more
    High School games and Youth sports. Yeah the abilities aren't the same
    but you can still root for a team just as hard.
    
61.1919SALEM::DODACelts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailableMon Nov 06 1995 16:1110
   > Excuse me but the NFL has revenue sharing, a salary cap and
   > everything else you wanted in MLB. 

    Jones has circumvented the revenue sharing with his own 
    private endorsements. The salary cap is a joke as proven by the 
    Deion deal, which by the way was largely financed by his 
    Coke/pepsi/whatever deals.

    daryll
61.1920MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Nov 06 1995 16:1613
   
    >> I'd guess that the Browns do not have the same resourced 
    >> to generate the type of revenue that Jones has the opportunity 
    >> for. Modell chose this method in order to remain competitive. I 
    >> don't support either move.

       Modell has a hundred million reasons to move to Baltimore and
       being competitive with the Cowboys ain't one of them. He better
       worry about being competitive with the Steelers, Oilers, Bengals
       and Jaguars first because he ain't. This move didn't just happen 
       since Jones cut his deal with Nike. It's been in the works for a
       while.
        
61.1921More interesting than the Browns, and this is the Ballimer noteEDWIN::WAUGAMANIf you're traveling back to GeorgiaMon Nov 06 1995 16:1815
>>          -< Let's send in Levinson to investigate this homicide... >-
>
> Great season so far for Levinson....IMO.
    
    I screwed up and missed the second half of the arsonist episode.
    What happened?
    
    Sad to see Ned Beatty's character leave, but good riddance
    to that Baldwin jerk.  As long as they keep Det. Pembleton, though,
    the show is a keeper.  Pembleton has got to be the best character on
    all of television...
    
    glenn
    
61.1922We have found the enemy and ...AKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 06 1995 16:2218
    Well regardless, this should finally put an end to the perception that
    franchise owners have some kind of moral or ethical high-ground and
    that the greed is on the side of the players.  I, personally would go
    one step furthur and say that the Jordans and Cones could never go far
    enough in their distrust of sports ownership.
    
    And there's another good reason not to bash Groaner etco; Our own team
    is now on tenterhooks with the megaplex dead for another year. 
    Regardless of indoor-outdoor, in Boston in Foxboro arguments, Kraft had
    an assurance of a new stadium and he now knows he was a sucker. 
    Whereas Moledell's move is without conscience, Kraft could and maybe
    will have to go where the money and civic support is.
    
    Finally we see in this tale of two cities a completely different view
    of urban economics: Baltimore management is saying having the pro
    football team will bring big economic payback, Cleveland not so
    strongly and surely tardily and finally Boston who tells Kraft "you're
    not important, we can do without you and conventions too".
61.1924ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Nov 06 1995 16:2825
    
>    Zeier showed why he was a 3rd round pick and why
>    Georgia never won anything.
    
    I still think Zeier will be a fine QB; that's he's not there yet isn't
    terribly surprising.
    
>    And it also brings up the question - How much money is enough?  What
>    the hell is the old man gonna do with the extra $50 million?
    
    FWIW: he's going to keep it so his son can pay the inheritance tax
    when Modell dies, or so he says.
    
    If the Browns move, at least Cleveland will be free of Modell.
    
    You know, a few years back Bill James proposed (in his Baseball Book)
    making it illegal for cities to spend public money to lure teams
    away _or_ to stay.  If a market isn't making money, fine - a team 
    that thinks it can do better elsewhere can move.  But you wouldn't 
    get insanity such as Balitmore's $50 million offer _or_ Modell's
    attempt to blackmail Cleveland.  I _really_ hope Cleveland doesn't
    give in - if Modell's going to be a jerk, let him go.  I sincerely
    doubt the NFL is going to stay out of Cleveland for long...
    
    Joe 
61.1925SALEM::DODACelts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailableMon Nov 06 1995 16:298
As I said, you can choose to believe whatever you like. I've been 
consistent in my opinion of moving franchises, MLB or NFL.

We're in violent agreement on the move.

Let it drop.

daryll
61.1926They're all stinking thieves, NFL worst of all...EDWIN::WAUGAMANIf you're traveling back to GeorgiaMon Nov 06 1995 16:3123
>     This is also why I said that 
>     Tagliabue is full of it when he says that deals like Jerry's Nike 
>     deal will entice more teams to move. If anything the Nike deal is 
>     an enticement to stay right where the hell you are. Tagliabue, it's 
>     the DALLAS Cowboys. It's the CLEVELAND Browns. If you can build and
>     succesfully market your team why move?
    
    I have to disagree some here.  The Dallas Cowboys are a very special
    case possibly in all of sports and certainly in all of the NFL.
    Jerry Jones didn't create their marketing success, he merely restored
    it to its former glory, which was a _relatively_ easy task (on the 
    marketing end).  When he pulls out and doesn't share that marketing
    revenue, it raises the bar for everyone else.  Call it greed, sure,
    that's what it is, but it's almost human nature to strive to be #1 or
    to at least shoot for what #1 is hauling down.  Keeping up with the 
    Joneses, literally in this case. 
    
    Independent licensing deals, personal seat licenses, stadium deals,
    franchise moves; I'll throw them all in the same pot...
    
    glenn
    
61.1927BIGQ::MCKAYMon Nov 06 1995 16:444
    let's see Browns move to Baltimore, Pats move to Cleveland, Groaner
    becomes Pats fan via rule 1 of fan rules posted somewhere.
    
    Jimbo
61.1928 I doubt itAKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 06 1995 16:472
    the question is does he become a Baltimore Browns fan and commute down
    to  Baltimore for games?
61.1929DELNI::FORGETMon Nov 06 1995 17:015
    
    
     Now that the Browns appear to be moving to Baltimore, what happens
    to the Baltimore Stallions (CFL)?  Seattle,Cinnicinti, Tampa Bay, NE,
    Houston are all looking to relocate.  
61.1930SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 06 1995 17:2319
  It's always bad for the old fans when teams move but it's not the end of the
world. In fact there is a tradition for Baltimore losing one team and replacing
them with the "Browns". 

  In baseball Baltimore lost the Yankees back in 1903 then around 1954 they
went out and got the St. Louis Browns. The Mayor of St Louis and their fans
were up in arms but somehow it all worked out.

  It's a free market and ultimately the 30 cities most willing and able to
support pro football will end up with teams. That is if there are 30 cities
willing and able to support pro football.

  Cleveland is a decent size city with a football tradition. If they want
a team it will just be a matter of a few years before they get one. Most
likely what it will take is building a new football stadium.

  Who knows, maybe they'll lure the Colts away from Indy.

  George
61.1931OLD1S::CADZILLA2I packed my John Lee HookerMon Nov 06 1995 17:593
    
    So Groaner, are you going to start rooting for the Bengals after the
    Browns leave the mistake by the lake for greener pastures in MARYland.
61.1932 Isn't Pittsburgh just as close?AKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 06 1995 18:401
    
61.1933Crazed Nation pipes in on AKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 06 1995 19:0314
        #2           6-NOV-1995 14:39:31.37                                 
    NEWMAIL
    From:   US2RMC::"francus@yossi.com" "Yoseff francus"
    Subj:   please post
    
    Another banner day for the city of Cleveland. The chance that any team
    from Cleveland will win a championship takes a blow with the Browns
    moving to Baltimore. A team with tradition and history in a city has
    given up on the city. Not something to be proud of.
    
    Any reactio yet from the tearsome duo??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
61.1934ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 06 1995 19:127
61.1935MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonMon Nov 06 1995 19:132
	Anyone have any idea what the players' union has to say about
	franchise relocation ?  Anything ?  Are they supportive ?
61.1936Couldn't have been more emphatic-- greed knows some bounds?EDWIN::WAUGAMANIf you're traveling back to GeorgiaMon Nov 06 1995 19:149
                                                                   
>	Anyone have any idea what the players' union has to say about
>	franchise relocation ?  Anything ?  Are they supportive ?
    
    Gene Upshaw spoke out adamantly against it, in the Browns' case...
    
    
    glenn
    
61.1937SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Mon Nov 06 1995 19:197
    
    	Its called what will the courts decide this time? The City of
    Cleveland has gone to court and filed an injunction. To try and
    prevent the team from moving. Modell needs the vote of 23 owners
    to get permission to move. What will the NFL do this time?
    
    Ron
61.1938CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Nov 06 1995 19:336
    
    they'll probably try to block it but will have no success. Ditka
    was all over Jerry Jones blaming him for the move. I'm not surprised
    Modell's always been a first class idiot in my books.........
    
    mike
61.1939ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 06 1995 19:483
61.1940SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Nov 06 1995 19:547
  I don't think the owners have much of a chance in court. Didn't they try
to stop Davis from moving the Oakland Raiders to L.A.? I don't think he worried
a lot about getting permission to move back either.

  Same with the Colts, wasn't that a "midnight move"?

  George
61.1941AKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 06 1995 20:008
    I believe for the Rams move to St Louis the nfl managed to funnel some
    of the money to the league as a compromise.  If the NFL were to try to
    stop this move after not stopping the Colts from moving a decade ago
    then they might have two suits: Modell and Baltimore.
    
    Upshaw may have had some pretty words but the Baltimore deal puts more
    money in the Cap bank for the players.  What they don't get (I presume)
    is a cut of the action Modell gets for the actual move.
61.1942Going, going, going, .... but not quite gone, yet.SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOMon Nov 06 1995 20:1112
From Reuters:

The city of Cleveland has won a temporary restraining order to stop the 
Browns from moving.  The state of Maryland has reported that they have signed
a contract to move the team.  However, looks like Cleveland won't let 'em
go without a fight.

My guess is they'll delay 'em, but this deal is cooked.  The Browns will be
in Indianapolis by July of 1996.  Modelll trully sucks.  This makes no
sense to me at all.

zamboni
61.1943MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonMon Nov 06 1995 20:1714
>    Maybe in this instance Modell is an idiot, but he has done as much for
>    the league in the past as any other owner.

     I wouldn't call him an idiot; if I had a chance to make 50 million dollars
     I'd probably do it, too.  However, anyone calling him a traitor to the
     Cleveland area would be right on; he certainly shouldn't ever try any
     other business venture there.

     Of course, maybe he thought the Indians had a great chance to win the
     World Series; when he saw them fail, then reflected on his past failed
     opportunities to get to the Super Bowl with the Browns, he might have 
     decided the city really is a cursed, jinxed place and figured his only
     hope to achieve true greatness were dependent on a move.  That seems
     highly logical to me.
61.1944Tcm - Add inAKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 06 1995 20:4620
    I happened upon the basenote (61.0) earlier by Hal - pretty prophetic
    except he's selling (out) the city not the team.
    
    And the crazy met responds but I think this is my last shot at Mr
    Postman and of course I disclaim any and all opinions of either party
    except to say watching those two go at it was one of the little
    chestnuts of sprots-dom
    
    From tcm
    
    
    Subj:   Re: please post
    
    po' po' Groaner having insult heaped upon injury. The Indians 100 win
    season goes for naught and then his beloved Browns up and leave town.
    It is a comfort to know that I can be of some service in getting him to
    post and share his feelngs with others; he needs to be able to share
    his pain at such a miserable time in his life.
    
    The Crazy Met
61.1945ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Nov 07 1995 01:104
61.1946IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Nov 07 1995 11:457
RE: .1945

Please explain.  A runt is "an undersized person" (American Heritage dict.).

So, are his words worthless because he's undersized?

By the way, his picture wasn't there... :-)
61.1947free market indeedSALEM::DODACelts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailableTue Nov 07 1995 12:2514
During last nights half time show, Peter King from SI stated that 
the Cowboys grossed over 40 million more than the Browns last 
year and that his recent deal which circumvent the NFL properties 
partnership is enabling him to widen that gap and use that money 
for signing bonus' for Sanders and others.

So how some of you, who applauded Jones' moneygrab, and believe that 
those actions have nothing to do with this move can continue to 
bleat on about how they were unrelated defy logic.

The Browns are 30 mil in the red, most of it coming over the past 
two years. That is from keeping up with the Jones.

daryll
61.1948SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Tue Nov 07 1995 13:2120
    
    	Plain and simple, even with 75K+ at every game. With great
    fan support. The Browns are still loosing money. Modell has been asking
    for years, for stadium renovations. What has Cleveland done? They
    built Jacobs Field, Gund Arena, and the Rock and Roll hall of fame.
    Art's basically saying to the city of Cleveland. You choose who you
    were going to support. You built Baseball and Basketball stadiums.
    Plus the Rock and Roll hall a fame. I'm going somewhere that will
    build me a stadium.
    	Modell would be a stupid business man if he didn't take the deal.
    They are building a new 200 million 70K seat stadium. With luxury
    boxes and 7,500 preferred seating. He his getting a 30 yr lease for
    free. His only expense is going to be the maintenance on the stadium.
    Which is expected to be ~4 million a year. He gets parking,
    concessions, plus all stadium advertising.
    	With other deals like this one waiting. I expect the Patriots to
    leave New England, for the '97 season.
    
    
    Ron
61.1949ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Nov 07 1995 13:403
61.1950MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Nov 07 1995 13:4410
	To a Steeler fan this move by Modell sucks pond water!

	It's like the Hatfields up and moving to Beverly Hills
	leaving the McCoys alone with no one to shoot at.

	What fun is that?!



	billl
61.1951IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Nov 07 1995 13:484
>    What happens when the 1997 Patriots take the field in the new stadium
>    in Cleveland?

Oh, I'm sure you'll bandwagon-jump... :-)
61.1952ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Nov 07 1995 13:5211
    
    OK, at this point, the best scenario I can come up with is:
    
    1) The Browns move, only to find themselves playing in front of
       no one.
    
    2) Cleveland gets an expansion team.
    
    The Browns are running 15 million/year in the red?  Yeah, right...
    
    Joe
61.1953OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Nov 07 1995 14:069
61.1954Nothing seems final to me yetAKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 07 1995 14:187
    This still has to pass a vote of owners and if owners veto it will have
    to go to court.  Although Davis and Alioto beat the NFL that doesn't
    mean that Modell automatically will.  And if this does pass court test
    because NFL can't deny any team from doing what it does then is the
    league truly viable and does it need new bylaws.
    
    Perhaps a deal will be cut and Tampa will move into Cleveland.
61.1955ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Nov 07 1995 14:2123
    
>    What guarantees Cleveland an expansion team?
    
    Nothing.  OTOH, it's not a terribly unlikely result, if some team
    doesn't move to Cleveland first...
    
>    What size market are they?
    
    #13.  In terms of TV ratings, consistently #1 or close to it, though...
    
>     L.A. will be first when it comes to that.
 
    Nah, someone will move to LA, first.
       
>    This also goes to show you that it is cheaper to keep a team, than to 
>    let it go and hope for another team.  The Browns would've stayed for a
>    ~$270M investment.  An expansion team would cost them a new stadium
>    anyway + the franchise fees, etc.
    
    Of course, there's already an issue on the ballot in Cleveland that
    will put up the money for a stadium...
    
    Joe
61.1956ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Nov 07 1995 14:236
    
>    Perhaps a deal will be cut and Tampa will move into Cleveland.
    
    I wouldn't want them (or any other existing team, for that matter).
    
    Joe
61.1957IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Nov 07 1995 14:295
>    I wouldn't want them (or any other existing team, for that matter).

Yeah, I think that if/when the Patriots move, I would feel the same way.
It would feel better to start from scratch.  Although I could live with the
49ers... :-)
61.1958OLD1S::CADZILLA2I packed my John Lee HookerTue Nov 07 1995 14:304
    
    What current owner in his right mind would want to play in that stadium? 
    Cleveland has great fan support, but they're to cheap to build a new
    stadium. Why didnt they build Jacobs as a multi-purpose arena?
61.1959ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Nov 07 1995 14:3718
    
>    What current owner in his right mind would want to play in that stadium? 
    
    Oh, come on.  Are you seriously suggesting that a team playing in
    Cleveland Stadium can't be in the top 30 in terms of stadium revenue?
    
>    Cleveland has great fan support, but they're to cheap to build a new
>    stadium.
    
    Are they?  There's a measure on the ballot _today_ to provide money
    for just such a venture.
    
>    Why didnt they build Jacobs as a multi-purpose arena?
    
    Because they wanted a great _baseball_ field.  I don't have _any_
    problem with that decision.
    
    Joe
61.1960IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Nov 07 1995 14:386
>Why didnt they build Jacobs as a multi-purpose arena?

I think it was built by the guy who owned the Indians - he could probably
care less about the Browns.  Who knows, single-purpose might have even been
a stipulation.  Any of you Cleveland guys have the financial details on that
one?
61.1961OLD1S::CADZILLA2I packed my John Lee HookerTue Nov 07 1995 14:534
    
    	If that stadium is generating so much revenue why is Modell pulling
    out? From what I've seen of the other stadiums, Cleveland Municpal has
    to be one of if not the worst in the league. 
61.1962MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Nov 07 1995 15:0927
    
       I have a problem with two things...
    
       One. The idea that this was all precipitated by Jerry Jones'
       cash grab. No way. This all started when Al Davis showed that
       the real big money wasn't in building a successful franchise.
       The really big money is in moving or holding up the city that
       you're in. Bob Irsay learned that lesson well. So did Frontiere
       and the rest. Baltimore may or may not be competitive with the
       Cowboys and the 9ers. If they are it'll because they've got a
       good front office not because they have deep pockets. The blame
       here doesn't lie with Jerry Jones, it lies with the owners who move
       and the cities that are foolish enough to pay them. Wave a half a
       billion dollars in someone's face and they tend to do some crazy
       (or not so crazy) things.
    
       The other thing is this belief that cities and states should pay
       ransom to keep their franchises. There's a huge emotional attachment
       between teams and towns and some owners will exploit that to full
       financial advantage. Modell says that he didn't want to hold the
       city of Cleveland up. He didn't have to! He's getting damn near a 
       half a billion dollar deal. How is Cleveland going to compete with
       that? And why would they? In the vast majority of American cities,
       including Boston, there are many better ways to spend a half billion 
       dollars. Working on graduating better than 50% of your high school
       students would be a good place to start. What Baltimore is doin is
       insane and only increases the likelihood that other teams will move.
61.1963SALEM::DODACelts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailableTue Nov 07 1995 15:2716
No wait a minute. Irsay moved over 10 years ago. The Raiders move 
or threatened moves almost every year for the past 15 years. Now, 
all of a sudden, we have at least 3 teams (that we know of) that 
are seriously considering moving and you think that the deals in 
Dallas have nothing to do with it? Then why now, why not 2,5,10 
years ago?

BS. It has everything to do with it. It's the support of Jones 
that's the problem here. All that free market drivel that I've 
had thrown in my face during the baseball strike rings true here, 
but this is different eh? Hardly.

The NFl is a partnership and Jones is hardly acting as a partner. 
The others are just following suit.

daryll
61.1964MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Nov 07 1995 15:3417
  >> BS. It has everything to do with it. It's the support of Jones 
  >> that's the problem here. 

     Daryll, two teams moved last year (Rams, Raiders). That was before
     Jones deal was announced. Kraft, Modell and the rest of them gave
     their ultimatums before the Jones deal was announced. Get used to 
     it. This is sports life in the '90s. Modell didn't see Jones make his 
     deal and then think, "Gee, I have to screw Browns fans to the wall 
     to be competitive." Baltimore waved an ungodly amount of money in 
     his face and he grabbed it. Plain and simple. He didn't lose $30
     million. He isn't trying to compete with the Cowboys. He's going
     for the bucks and that's all.

    
     
    
61.1965New name?AKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 07 1995 15:3717
    The basic question seems to be What is the economic viability of an NFL
    Franchise and is the State of Maryland making an intelligent decision
    in spending the money to build and bring a stadium/team to Baltimore
    vis a vis Tommy's argument of spending the money on education.
    
    Interestingly the first city to be held for ransom was Boston and it
    lost the Patriots to Foxboro but New England was saved when Fine built
    the stadium for < 10 mil.
    
    Btw - if Cleveland sues to retain the name Browns for a future team
    what will the new Baltimore team be called:
    
    	The 	new-colts
    		new-young-spririted-horses
    		Baltimore Football Orioles
    		Pirates/Thieves/Extortionists/Swindlers
    		Soft Shells
61.1966Baltimore deserves much of the blam (tm)TNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasTue Nov 07 1995 15:5020
    I don't think competing with Cowboys (or anybody else for that matter)
    had anyu bearing at all on this deal.  To me, competition is just above
    loyalty to the fans in the pecking order for an NFL owner.  This deal
    is about one thing and one thing only:  M-O-N-E-Y.
    
    If we are to believe what we read, Modell is getting a $50 million cash
    incentive just to money.  He gets 30 years rent free a the new
    stadium.  He's even getting improvements to enlarge the seating
    capacity at War Memorial Stadium for the two years his team will play
    there.  He gets all the money from concessions.  He gets all the money 
    from parking.  He gets all the money from signs.  He gets 108 luxury
    boxes from which he keeps all the revenues.  There is $15 million to
    build a separate training facility, which will be funded from those
    odious permanent seat licenses.
    
    It's clear that the city of Baltimore and the state of Maryland have
    sold their soul to get an NFL franchise.  I'd love to see this blow up
    in their greedy little faces.
    
    NAZZ
61.1967becoming terminally cynical...MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Nov 07 1995 15:5410
	With the latest trends of all professional sports, it's 
	almost enough to snub them all and turn to college
	sports for entertainment.

	My only problem with that is I'm afraid the college's
	are hot on their heels.


	
	billl
61.1968AKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 07 1995 15:598
    Nazz,
    	Are you forgetting that Baltimore had a team stolen from it?  They
    can hardly be blamed, last of all at any rate.  They know life with a
    team and without and are choosing "with".  They've already been told in
    no uncertain terms there are no rules and all is fair.
    
    	And this baloney about Modell losing money.  Along with all the
    rest... is there absolutely no limit to human gullibility?
61.1969SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Nov 07 1995 16:0722
  Someone mentioned an expansion team and there lies the problem. The free
market is working, it's working very well and what it's saying is that any
irresponsible organization, like MLB or the NFL that expands too much is going
to get into trouble. 

  Right now there are 30 NFL Football teams and many of them are struggling.
Is going to 32 or 34 really the answer? I don't think so. When every other
industry is downsizing only the major league sports are trying to expand then
getting all bent out of shape because the weaker teams can't seen to cut it.

  Because they over expanded the pickings are slim and teams can no longer run
sloppy operations and get away with it. TV money gets spread thinner, there is a
lot more competition for the best cities. Teams have to operate at smaller
margins and be more efficient or they will lose money.

  Ultimately someone will probably figure out that the problem is that there
are too many teams and they will have to cut back to a level that will be
supported by the fans. That happened in baseball all the time back in the
19th century when they were going through this type of chaos and it's probably
what will end up happening here.

  George
61.1970CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Nov 07 1995 16:1320
There was a big discussion on this the other day on the FAN and they were
saying (and rightly so IMO) that expansion should stop for a while.
The reason was basically is that there are not enough quality QBs to go around
right now.

Sort of like in baseball, there's never enough quality pitchers.


Personally, and probably most folks will dispute me, but I think that over the
years integrity and tradition, and loyalty have fallen by the wayside.

I'm sure that years ago, owners could have pulled the same crap that Al Davis,
Bob Irsay and now Art Modell are pulling, but probably back then things like
integrity and loyalty and tradition meant a little more than they mean today.

Nowadays it's the almighty buck.  Gotta move the team cause we can make a big
bonanza payday.


It's sad.  Everything is so plastic today....
61.1971IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Nov 07 1995 16:2124
>    	Are you forgetting that Baltimore had a team stolen from it?  They
>       can hardly be blamed, last of all at any rate.

Why?

If someone does something to you, does that make it OK to go ahead and do
the same thing to someone else?  If I put a gun to your head and rob you, is
it OK for you to turn around and do the same to someone else.  If anything,
having experienced that, I'd think you'd show a little more empathy towards
those being robbed.

Your logic is faulty at best.

Johnny U. was on TV this morning saying that he would have greatly preferred
an expansion team over taking the team from another city, but that the NFL
wouldn't grant them an expansion franchise.  If you buy into the logic that you
*have* to have a team, this makes sense.  I'm not sure I can buy into that,
though.

If the Patriots wanted $500 million in concessions to stay, I'd think the state
of Massachusetts would be *crazy* to give it to them.  Like Tommy said, there
are significantly more important things to spend the money on.  I'd *love* to
see the financial analysis where the folks of Baltimore and the state of 
Maryland figured out how much cash they could throw at this.
61.1972ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Nov 07 1995 16:2320
    
>    If that stadium is generating so much revenue why is Modell pulling
>    out?
    
    1) Modell gets $50 million cash up front for moving.
    
    2) Modell gets a new stadium that, potentially, can produce even
       _more_ revenue.

    3) Modell gets a 10 year guarentee that he'll get the maximum
       possible revenue, even if no one shows up.
    
>    From what I've seen of the other stadiums, Cleveland Municpal has
>    to be one of if not the worst in the league. 
    
    Have you ever been there?  While it's not state of the art, it's
    still a fine place to watch a game.
    
    Joe
    
61.1973OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Nov 07 1995 16:256
61.1974New England would do it in a minute tooAKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 07 1995 16:3612
    They're hardly robbing anyone in fact they're saving the good football
    fans of Cleveland thousands of dollars wasted on Sunday afternoons not
    to speak of the healthy exercise and other positive  non-football
    things they can do. 
    
    And there are rules against robbery but the nfl has told Baltimore
    there are no rules regarding bringing a team to town, only "have plenty
    of money".
    
    By not granting Baltimore another team all the cities acquiessed (sic)
    in the "theft" and became potential targets themselves.  Nothing wrong
    with my logic only in your slanting of it.
61.1975SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Nov 07 1995 16:4715
RE          <<< Note 61.1973 by OUTSRC::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>

>    There is a way where this type of thing can be curbed in all sports. 
>    Say the Browns do go to Baltimore.  Have a civil court judge award
>    Cleveland financial damages equivalent to what Baltimore offered
>    Modell.  I think this would make team owners think twice.
    
  I don't think there is any basis for this type of remedy in civil law. Unless
there was a contract that was breached, the Browns have the right to go to any
city they want. Even if there was a contract they would only be responsible for
what that contract specified.

  I'm afraid your motion would be denied.

  George
61.1976Baltimore, of all cities, should know betterTNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasTue Nov 07 1995 16:5512
    I am certainly not forgetting that Bob Irsay slinked out of Baltimore
    in the middle of the night.  But as another noter so accurately put it,
    that should make the city of Baltimore and the state of Maryland more
    aware of how terrible it feels to lose their franchise and less likely
    to do it to someone else.
    
    It's great that Maryland can afford to throw $500 million at Modell to
    lure him to Baltimore, but the glow of having an NFL franchise may dim
    some when tax increases and service cuts are needed to give Modell his
    pound of flesh.
    
    NAZZ
61.1977SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Nov 07 1995 17:0826
  This situation is likely to get worse before it gets any better. The problem
is that the leagues are too big. There are too many major league teams trying
to make a go of it in minor league towns. 

  If you look back to the 50's most major leagues had about 16 teams. Then when
TV money came along they all expanded to the low 20s and that seemed to work
OK. If there were differences between what you could make in New York and
Minneapolis TV money split 24 ways seemed to iron things out. 

  Problem is that now they are up around 30 teams and TV money split 30 ways
can't iron out the problems it could when there were 24 or so teams trying to
split the pie. This results in there being teams that are haves and teams that
are have nots with the poorer teams scrambling to pick up the chips where ever
they land. 

  The courts clearly won't let the leagues or cities enact rules saying who can
play where so the leagues will eventually have to do what every other industry
has to do when they over expand, downsize. 

  It happened here at Digital, it's happened in other places a million times.
If you get to big for your market you ultimately have two choices, make cuts or
go out of business. Unless they come up with a new form of revenue the major
leagues now hurting at around 30 teams each will have to seriously consider
cutting back to the low or mid 20s or this situation will only get worse. 

  George 
61.1978CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Nov 07 1995 17:328
    
    If Modell is loosing money in Cleveland it would have to be because
    he has a bigger drug problem than the city of boston combined. TV
    money a stadium that's always full and his share of the other revenue.
    There's no way he's loosing money. He may not be making as much as
    some other owners but no way he's loosing money.......
    
    mike
61.1979I made 10 mil less than Jerry = I lost 10AKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 07 1995 17:4415
    Exactly, in corpspeak "losing money" means not making as much money as
    one would like, the same thing that Michael Jordan is condemned for
    speaking out about.
    
    When the famous "caps" were enacted which froze profits connected to
    gate revenue and tv revenue the race was on for dollars that the
    players couldn't get a percent of or other income whether the dratted
    players could touch it or not.
    
    Thus Jerry Jones, thus Art Modell.  The sticky thing to understand is
    the consummate grief that an Art Modell feels, the pain mind you, when
    he sees one of his nfl peers making more money than him.
    
    As with Michael and Patrick the actual money no longer counts its the
    race to make more than the other guy.
61.1980IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Nov 07 1995 17:5610
>    Thus Jerry Jones, thus Art Modell.  The sticky thing to understand is
>    the consummate grief that an Art Modell feels, the pain mind you, when
>    he sees one of his nfl peers making more money than him.

My empathy for him is unbounded...

I wouldn't be surprised if some fanatic Browns season ticket-holder blew up
Baltimore's Memorial Stadium.  Then Modell doesn't have anyplace to play for
two years...  I'm sure the city of Cleveland could rent to him at a <ahem>
reasonable price...
61.1981CSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Tue Nov 07 1995 18:1218
     >>When the famous "caps" were enacted which froze profits connected to
     >>gate revenue and tv revenue the race was on for dollars that the
     >>players couldn't get a percent of or other income whether the dratted
     >>players could touch it or not.
    
     I think things the players will be coming after the league for money
    from Season ticket licences, Luxury Boxes and even things like the
    money Baltimore is giving Modell (50 mill?) for moving. There agreement
    calls for x % of all NFL revenues. From what I've read that means
    everything! So JJ's Pepsi deal, Al Davis' sweetheart deal with Oakland
    could end up being big plusses for the players. 
    Another thing I read this weekend was that the owners were looking for
    an arbitrator ruling on Neon Dion's contract. If the arbitrator ruled
    it illegal then there would be enough owner votes to extend the current 
    players contract for 3 years. If the loopholes were not closed then we
    may have another Labor dispute brewing.
    
    Mike
61.1982MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Nov 07 1995 18:2815
    
       The owners aren't just trying to stash revenue from the players. 
      They're trying to stash it from each other. Hence, the Jones deal.
      Hence, Personal Seat Licenses. Hence, the franchise moves. Hence, 
      the cry for the dreaded luxury boxes. All those are revenues that 
      they don't have to share with the other 29 multi-millionaires. And 
      these moves aren't a function of expansion. Though I agree with George 
      that the leagues are over expanded. Over expansion breeds mediocrity 
      and that's what we're seeing week after week. This is really a fun-
      ction of a skewed set of values on the part of owners and the cities 
      that court them. I didn't disagree with Jerry Jones' side deals be-
      cause I didn't see who got hurt save a few rich owners who might 
      actually have to work a little harder. The Modell move, on the other
      hand, sends a very disturbing signal. There's never been a better
      time to be a Cowboys fan or a worse time to be a Browns fan.
61.1983As you can tell, I don't play a lawyer on TVTNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasThu Nov 09 1995 12:466
    I've simply gotta believe that personal seat licenses are illegal for
    teams that currently exist.  I can understand how Jacksonville and
    Carolina can do it, but making current season ticket holders pay for
    something they already have seems like double jeopardy or sumpin'.
    
    NAZZ
61.1984SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 09 1995 15:588
  So when is the next Browns home game? Think Art Modell will be there to cheer
on his team? 

  I can't imagine the Browns will get the same fan support they've enjoyed in
the past, I'm wondering if there will be any type of protest by the fans
other than booing and waving nasty signs.

  George
61.1985Art'll prolly miss this one, tooHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 09 1995 16:026
*Sunday, Nov. 19
        Green Bay at Cleveland, 1 p.m.

Should be fun, dontcha think.

TTom
61.1986Fans will show upODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsThu Nov 09 1995 16:135
    I gotta believe that the Cleveland fans will come out to support the
    players (they didn't move the team!), but Art better have that bullet
    proof glass put up in the owners box by then.
    
    UMDan
61.1987IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Thu Nov 09 1995 16:165
>  So when is the next Browns home game? Think Art Modell will be there to cheer
>on his team? 

No.  He's already stated that he won't be attending any more home games
this year...
61.1988SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 09 1995 16:2213
RE              <<< Note 61.1985 by HBAHBA::HAAS "graffiti limbo" >>>

>*Sunday, Nov. 19 Green Bay at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
>
>Should be fun, dontcha think.

  That's for sure. If NBC runs it we could be talking Super Bowl numbers,
something like a 30 share.

  Well ok, not that much but I'll bet a lot of people will tune in to see
what happens.

  George
61.1989could happenHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 09 1995 16:279
Maybe not all that surprising, there are a lot of Browns fans and fan
clubs around this here way. So far, they haven't seen the humor in all
this.

Since this is so screwed up, I'm predicting that the Browns will beat
Pittsburgh mostly cause almost everyone is giving up immediately on this
year's model. The Browns then return and get whooped bad by the Packers.

TTom
61.1990MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 09 1995 16:5413
 >> Well ok, not that much but I'll bet a lot of people will tune in to see
 >> what happens.
    
    A lot of people in Green Bay and Cleveland might tune in but most people 
    in the rest of the country won't even see it. There is still a season in
    progress. With Modell stating that he won't attend any more home games 
    this season, we won't get to see how the fans react to him, making this 
    game even less interesting. The only point of interest outside the actual 
    game itself is just how many people there are in the stands. I hope they're
    empty.
    
    
61.1991prioritiesSALEM::DODACelts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailableThu Nov 09 1995 20:459
         <<< Note 61.1990 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

 > I hope they're empty.

   I doubt he cares since they're paid for anyway.

   daryll    
    

61.1992SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Nov 10 1995 10:595
  I wonder if they are hoping they are empty. If the fans come they'll be
none too happy. There is the possibility of a protest that turns into a riot.
Stranger things have happened.

  George
61.1993BJODASIC::CHARRONtime for a changeWed Nov 15 1995 17:2618
    I am usually READ only in here, but I heard a joke from a friend of
    mine in Ohio the udder day that I thought people in here might get a 
    laugh out of.
    
    
    You're in a room with Mohamar Khadafy, Sadaam Hussein, and Art Modell.
    You have a gun and only two bullets. What do you do?
    
    
    
    
    
    shoot Modell twice!
    
    
    ;)   
    
    /brian 
61.1994;-)OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Nov 15 1995 17:332
61.1995OLD1S::CADZILLA2I packed my John Lee HookerWed Nov 15 1995 17:443
    
    
    Have Modell's fingerprints on the weapon!!
61.1996ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Nov 15 1995 17:4619
    
    There are a lot of Modell jokes going around NE Ohio, most of them
    _extremely_ nasty (see the end of this note for an example).  People
    are actively searching for ways to punish Modell - not just boycotting
    the Browns, but boycotting business Modell has ties to, etc.  A
    number of players (incl Pepper Johnson) have also made remarks that
    will eliminate any possibility they had of NE Ohio endorsements.
    Kosar's made noise about bringing a team back to NE Ohio; an ownership
    team led by Kosar would have _no_ trouble drawing fans, that's for
    certain.
    
    Joe
    
    The "joke":
    
    What's the difference between Adolf Hitler and Art Modell?

    A mustache.     
    
61.1997USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Nov 15 1995 19:185
>    are actively searching for ways to punish Modell

Joe H, what are the people of Ohio saying about the politicians ?
Seems to me they pushed the guy out of town after catering to the
Indians and the Cavs.
61.1998ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Nov 15 1995 19:3416
    
>Joe H, what are the people of Ohio saying about the politicians ?
>Seems to me they pushed the guy out of town after catering to the
>Indians and the Cavs.
    
    I haven't _heard_ many complaints about the pols - it's
    Modell whose scalp is sought.
    
    IMHO, the pols _didn't_ push Modell out, and were in fact reasonably
    accomidating - if not for a ridiculous offer from Baltimore, I don't
    think Modell would have had any real incentive to leave.  But
    Baltimore's offer was _so_ far outside the bounds of what almost
    any other city would offer a team to _stay_ that it was inevitable
    someone bit...
    
    Joe
61.1999USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Nov 16 1995 14:0111
>    Baltimore's offer was _so_ far outside the bounds of what almost
>    any other city would offer a team to _stay_ that it was inevitable
>    someone bit...

And now Cleveland will pay MORE to get another team, when they could
have kept their beloved Browns.

Sorry, but I think the people in an existing NFL town (save Oakland)
usually drop the ball, and the politicians are the ones representing
the average Joe.  Hopefully they'll wake up to that and take it out
on these bums come election time.
61.2000bend overHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 16 1995 14:0410
The Cleveland situation seems to be the typical bullsh*t going around
these days.

If'n you listen to Modell, he says he got screwed by the City.

If'n you listen to the City, they say they got screwed by Modell.

Meanwhile, all the fans - every fan - got screwed.

TTom
61.2001MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 16 1995 14:1922
  >> Sorry, but I think the people in an existing NFL town (save Oakland)
  >> usually drop the ball, and the politicians are the ones representing
  >> the average Joe.  Hopefully they'll wake up to that and take it out
  >> on these bums come election time.

     For what? Not being crazy enough to spend a half a billion dollars
     on a football team? I've read recently where Baltimore has the
     highest teen pregnancy rate in the country and is in the top five
     in other wonderful categories such as high school drop out rate.
     It would seem that they have better things to spend their money
     on than a football team. But that's how skewed values have gotten
     to where we think that the guys who don't pay the greenmail are 
     the jerks not the greenmailers. When the Central divsion of the
     AFC looks like it'll consist of big time burgs like Nashville,
     Cincinnatti, Pittsburg, Jacksonville and Baltimore and meanwhile
     two of the top ten biggest markets in the country (Houston and LA)
     will be teamless clearly something is wrong with the way the
     NFL and its owners do business. This will all blow up in their 
     faces and it'll happen sooner rather than later.
     
    
61.2002ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 16 1995 14:2413
    
>And now Cleveland will pay MORE to get another team, when they could
>have kept their beloved Browns.
    
    I'm not sure that's the case.  I certainly hope it isn't.
    
    IMHO, there's no reason the public should pay for anything more
    than a stadium for a team, and if they _do_ pay for a stadium, there's
    no reason the city _shouldn't_ be charging fair rent.
    
    Of course, my views and reality are fast diverging....
    
    Joe
61.2003SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 14:3816
  Good or bad this is the way supply and demand works. Regardless of whether or
not we agree with the wisdom of spending this kind of money on a franchise it
appears that people in some cities are willing to pay more per capita for this
type of product than people in other cities. 

  Last year on Homicide (which is set in Baltimore) they had something that was
interesting. They showed one of their older characters (the one played by Ned
Beatty) really despondent over the loss of the Colts talking about how the
CFL wasn't real football.

  I dismissed it as a general statement about old-timers and tradition at the
time but now I wonder if the writers of that show had done their homework and
were picking up on a popular public issue in Baltimore or if both the program
and the officials have misread the feelings of the taxpayers?

  George
61.2004Lottery kings say don't poach on meAKOCOA::BREENThu Nov 16 1995 15:0811
    Maybe George is more up than me on this or whoever but I get the
    feeling that Finneran and Malone have a certain motivation of
    protecting the state lottery interests for which they seem to be
    wanting the lions share of the recreational budget. And the tracks and
    casinos are not under the pols direct control and hiring.
    
    Now whether they feel that sports dollars come out of the household
    lottery budget I don't know.  I do like the idea of an Ontario style
    sports lottery to finance the new stadium (and foxboro-boston/outdoor-
    indoor arguments aside it does look like a new stadium is necessary to
    keep the Patriots.
61.2005USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Nov 16 1995 15:1229
>     For what? Not being crazy enough to spend a half a billion dollars
>     on a football team?

I don't know about 1/2 a billion, but from the reports I've read/heard,
Modell would have stayed had the city committed to renovating Municipal
Stadium a couple of years ago (luxury boxes).  Cleveland put him on hold
but went ahead and built new stadiums for the Indians and the Cavs...and
also kicked-in on the Rock-n-Roll HoF.

I also heard that years ago Modell wanted to move the team out to the
'burbs, but Cleveland officials begged him not to, for the sake of
the inner city.  He agreed.

The only argument I've heard in Cleveland's favor is that he put a
moratorium on talks with the city this summer, went and worked out
a deal with Baltimore, and didn't give Cleveland a chance (an
ultimatum).

To get another NFL team, they'll definitely have to build a stadium
(no new team will play in Municipal Stadium, renovated or not) and
also give them some cash (see St. Louis and Baltimore).

Dan-dorf on MNF said that history shows a city losing a team pays
twice as much to get a new one.

So the fans can scream at Modell, but I just don't believe that
a guy who spent 30 years in that city just walks out on 'em the
first time another city offers some bucks.  If that were the case
he'd have been gone before this.
61.2006SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 15:3419
RE                      <<< Note 61.2004 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
    
>    Now whether they feel that sports dollars come out of the household
>    lottery budget I don't know.  I do like the idea of an Ontario style
>    sports lottery to finance the new stadium (and foxboro-boston/outdoor-
>    indoor arguments aside it does look like a new stadium is necessary to
>    keep the Patriots.

  In Massachusetts the lottery has the sole purpose of providing money to the
cities and towns. Last time I heard the numbers, which was a few years back, 50
cents on every dollar went for prizes, 45 cents went to the cities and towns,
and 5 cents went to run the lottery.

  So I doubt they could use that money for building a stadium without a lot of
controversy over where the lottery dollars would be spent. What with Prop
2 1/2 still in effect cities and towns fight hard to keep what ever state
funding they receive.

  George
61.2007MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 16 1995 15:3612
  >> So the fans can scream at Modell, but I just don't believe that
  >> a guy who spent 30 years in that city just walks out on 'em the
  >> first time another city offers some bucks.  If that were the case
  >> he'd have been gone before this.

     It kind of reminds me of what Jerry Rice said in response to Deion's
     lament that neither Rice nor Steve Young called him when he was trying 
     to decide between SF and Dallas. "Yean right," Jerry said "one call
     from me and he's going to turn down 5 million dollars." Baltimore
     made Modell and offer that he couldn't refuse and he didn't. 
    
61.2008ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 16 1995 15:5328
    
>I don't know about 1/2 a billion, but from the reports I've read/heard,
>Modell would have stayed had the city committed to renovating Municipal
>Stadium a couple of years ago (luxury boxes).  Cleveland put him on hold
>but went ahead and built new stadiums for the Indians and the Cavs...and
>also kicked-in on the Rock-n-Roll HoF.

    One second here...
    
    _Cleveland_ didn't pay for the new stadiums (I don't know about their
    involvement in the R&R HoF).  The bulk of the new Stadia were payed
    for through a sin tax.  A sin tax which the people of Cleveland just
    renewed to _make_ the renovations to the Stadium.
    
>To get another NFL team, they'll definitely have to build a stadium
>(no new team will play in Municipal Stadium, renovated or not) and
>also give them some cash (see St. Louis and Baltimore).

    Goodness, I hope not.  I can live with the idea of an expansion
    team in Cleveland, but I sincerely hope they don't try to steal
    someone else's team.
    
>Dan-dorf on MNF said that history shows a city losing a team pays
>twice as much to get a new one.

    Twice as much as _what_?
    
    Joe
61.2009ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 15:5914
RE       <<< Note 61.2008 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>>Dan-dorf on MNF said that history shows a city losing a team pays
>>twice as much to get a new one.
>
>    Twice as much as _what_?
    
  I believe he said that it would cost twice as much to get a new team as
it would have cost to keep the old one.

  As for an expansion team, the league is already about 8 teams too top
heavy. Adding more teams will only make this problem worse.

  George
61.2010ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 16 1995 16:1311
    
>  As for an expansion team, the league is already about 8 teams too top
>heavy. Adding more teams will only make this problem worse.
    
    That all depends...
    
    I'm sure the US could support 50 NFL teams, given the right
    circumstances.  The current situation, however, clearly wouldn't
    work with 50...
    
    Joe
61.2011which 8?HBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 16 1995 16:150
61.2012SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 16:4120
  Which 8 what?

  I believe that considering the amount of money available from Box office and
TV there is enough money to support about 22-24 major league teams in Football
and Baseball. Beyond that they lose any natural stability and end up with some
teams that are very rich and others that are poor. This makes it almost
impossible for poor teams to remain competitive.

  If there are only 2-3 poor teams then some sort of revenue sharing will work
but with 8-10 poor teams the only result can be chaos and disasters of the sort
we are seeing now.

  My guess is that this round of musical cities for big local money will run
it's course and in the end they will realize they can't support that many
teams and the poorer teams will go belly up.

  At any rate the very LAST thing the NFL or MLB needs right now is another
expansion. It will only make this situation worse.

  George
61.2013what you saidHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 16 1995 16:5013
>  Which 8 what?

>Note 61.2009                CLEVELAND BROWNS 'DAWGS'                2009 of 2012
>ERICF::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs"     14 lines  16-NOV-1995 12:59
...
>  As for an expansion team, the league is already about 8 teams too top
>heavy. Adding more teams will only make this problem worse.
>
>  George

These 8.

TTom
61.2014MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 16 1995 16:5814
  >> I believe that considering the amount of money available from 
  >> Box office and TV there is enough money to support about 22-24 
  >> major league teams in Football and Baseball. 

     As long as taxpayers are ready, willing and able to foot the bill
     and as long as there is revenue sharing expansion in football will 
     be supported. The product on the field will be mediocre, as it is 
     getting to be now, but financially owners/teams won't suffer because 
     they always have the option of playing one city against another or 
     even have the suburbs get into the act to try and lure a team away. 
     NFL franchises don't go out of business. They just pick up and move to
     greener pastures.
    
61.2015SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 17:0326
              <<< Note 61.2013 by HBAHBA::HAAS "graffiti limbo" >>>
>  Which 8?

  I'm not sure what point you are trying to make. If you try to put a quart of
jelly beans in a half quart container, which ones don't belong there? I don't
know, I guess the half that spills over the top. But just because you don't
know which ones don't belong that doesn't mean you don't know a quart of jelly
beans won't fit in a half quart container. 

  With today's economics it appears to me that there is room for 22-24 teams in
the NFL and MLB. Any more than that and there starts to be too much of a
difference between rich teams and poor teams. The leagues become unstable and
it's impossible for everyone to be playing on an equal basis due to financial
instability. 

  If free market economics sort it out then I guess the poorest 8 teams would
be the ones to go belly up but who knows? The last time an established major
league cut back was in 1899 when the National League cut back from 12 to 8 and
in that case the smaller cities seemed to lose out. I believe it was
Louisville, Washington, Cleveland and Buffalo, with Washington and Cleveland
picking up AL teams two years later. But that was a long time ago when the
economics were very different from what they are today. 

  Who knows, there's no real way to tell which teams would go if they cut back. 

  George 
61.2016carry on, thenHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 16 1995 17:045
Sorry Goerge,

I mistakenly thought you were trying to make a point.

TTom
61.2017SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 17:0915
RE         <<< Note 61.2014 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

>     NFL franchises don't go out of business. They just pick up and move to
>     greener pastures.
    
  That's certainly what they seem to be doing right now but my feeling is that
this system is very unstable and won't last. Sooner or later the price of a
winning team will become too high for private interests and the public will
get tired of paying the bill for teams they can no longer remember or keep
track of.

  Unstable system's just don't last, they either find a stable state or perish.
If that isn't a law of physics it probably should be.

  George
61.2018SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 17:1110
RE              <<< Note 61.2016 by HBAHBA::HAAS "graffiti limbo" >>>

>I mistakenly thought you were trying to make a point.

  I am. The point I'm making is that this chaos is caused by the fact that the
leagues are too big.

  Why is that not a point?

  George
61.2019Can't have it both waysMSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 16 1995 17:3312
    >> I am. The point I'm making is that this chaos is caused by the 
    >> fact that the leagues are too big.

    >> Why is that not a point?
    
       It's a point but a completely unsupported one. If there were *8*
       teams too many, you'd tend to think that the value of a franchise
       would be going down not up. If as you said earlier that what we're
       seeing is the law of supply and demand in action then in reality
       there are too *few* teams under the current system. That's not a
       point I agree with but that's where your logic is/was heading. 
61.2020SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 17:4012
  The law of supply and demand is based on what people are willing to pay at
the moment and has nothing to do with the wisdom of that decision or the
likelihood that the demand will remain. 

  I just don't see this system of higher and higher bidding going on forever
as the teams play musical cities. One of these days the music will stop and
there won't be any city willing to cough over the dough. When that happens
the leagues will shrink back to a more reasonable, competitive, and stable
size.

  That's my prediction,
  George
61.2021The Bad 8HBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 16 1995 17:4115
Actually, I thought we might be getting to a point where we could vote on
which 8 we wanted to demote to the minors.

My choices and reasons would be:

	Arizona - move you lose
	Cleveland - move you lose
	Detroit - even the fans don't like the team/coach/owner
	Houston - try to move you lose
	Indianapolis - move you lose
	New Orleans - losers
	Seattle - losers
	Tampa Bay - losers

TTom
61.2022MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Thu Nov 16 1995 17:596
	Hard to believe the NY/NJ Jets and Giants don't fit
	in there somewhere.



	billl
61.2023could be moreHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 16 1995 18:028
I got no porblem with adding the Jets.

I thought about the Iggles, too but they're playing too good right now.
And I threw out the Raiders cause they're usually good.

Feel free to add to the list...

TTom
61.2024I ain't yet da keeper of da_list or dis_listLANDO::FARLEYThu Nov 16 1995 18:5413
    
    Yabbut,
    
    Is jelly bean pouring a sport?
    
    deen to wonk(tm)
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    not liking the purple ones, though......
    /kev
    
61.2025MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonThu Nov 16 1995 18:5928
>  I just don't see this system of higher and higher bidding going on forever
> as the teams play musical cities. One of these days the music will stop and
> there won't be any city willing to cough over the dough. When that happens
> the leagues will shrink back to a more reasonable, competitive, and stable
> size.

  That's an interesting prediction, but I don't think it's valid.  

  First, there's the assumption that the U.S. public is smart enought to
  force teams to pay their own way.  I don't give the public, through their
  elected "leaders," that much credit.  At least for the near future (next
  10-20 years), I think that there will always be another market for an
  established team -- unless the entire economy takes a significant
  downturn (like the Depression, not like the mini-recessions we've seen
  off and on again in the last 25 years).

  Second, there's the assumption that the poorest teams are going to lose
  significant amounts of money.  I don't think there is any real evidence
  they have, or that they will.

  I do agree that the NFL is overexpanded.  However, a scenario where they
  cut back on the size of the league is extremely unlikely.  More likely is
  that the league will hire more bums, to replace slightly better, but higher
  priced, players in the non-glamour positions.  The NFL will accept putting
  a mediocre product on the field rather than cutting back the number of teams
  for one reason:  they know the public will buy the product anyway.

  The american sports consumer is not quality-conscious.
61.2026MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 16 1995 19:0317
  >> One of these days the music will stop and there won't be any city 
  >> willing to cough over the dough. When that happens the leagues will 
  >> shrink back to a more reasonable, competitive, and stable size.

  >> That's my prediction,
  
     I tend to think the same thing but I don't see it happening real
     soon what with the backlog of cities lusting after franchises,
     revenue sharing and some of the major markets still unrepresented
     Just as the baseball strike didn't last just the two weeks that 
     you predicted it would, unless some action is taken either by the 
     government or the NFL itself the current state of flux will con-
     tinue for the forseeable future with cities either ponying up
     or losing their teams.
    
    
61.2027ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 19:1213
  The baseball strike didn't last just two weeks the way I thought because I
didn't know that 1/3rd of the owners could veto an agreement. Had it been
majority rule I'm sure the strike would have been over quickly. The way they
were behaving looked to me as though they were really close to having the vote
go either way which would mean a majority wanted to settle. 

  Yeah, I agree it won't happen real soon but around the year 2000 something is
going to shake lose. I just don't see these huge leagues being stable enough to
last that long. Nowhere in history can I think of leagues this big ever
surviving for very long. Leagues need parity and there's no way to keep parity
in that large a league without some sort of outside funding. 

  George
61.2028MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonThu Nov 16 1995 19:1615
>   Yeah,I agree it won't happen real soon but around the year 2000 something is
>going to shake lose. I just don't see these huge leagues being stable enough to
>last that long. Nowhere in history can I think of leagues this big ever
>surviving for very long. Leagues need parity and there's no way to keep parity
>in that large a league without some sort of outside funding. 
>
>  George

 Nowhere in history can I think of where leagues this big ever failed to
 survive.  In fact, there is no precedent either way.  Maybe that's why you
 can't remember these things historically.  (Chapter 1, Build A Straw Man ...)

 Leagues don't need parity -- otherwise MLB would have died in the
 30's and 40's, and the NBA would have died in the 70's.  I'm not even sure
 fans prefer parity, quite frankly.
61.2029ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 19:2830
RE    <<< Note 61.2028 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R "Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon" >>>

> Nowhere in history can I think of where leagues this big ever failed to
> survive.  In fact, there is no precedent either way.  Maybe that's why you
> can't remember these things historically.  (Chapter 1, Build A Straw Man ...)

  There have been several times in history when new leagues have started and
failed long before reaching 30 teams total. Back in the 1870's the National
Association folded, in the 1880's the American Association folded with a few
teams jumping to the National League, in the teens the Federal League failed
and on an on. More often than not when the total number of major league teams
got to a certain level something gave.

  It's different this time because the existing leagues are expanding rather
than a new league starting up and that got them further but the instability
we are seeing is there for the same reason. Only so many major league teams
are viable at one time.

> Leagues don't need parity -- otherwise MLB would have died in the
> 30's and 40's, and the NBA would have died in the 70's.  I'm not even sure
> fans prefer parity, quite frankly.

  The 30's and 40's were a weird time for Major League baseball because the
rules and laws allowed them to run a much more strict type of organization
than they ever ran before or can ever run again. They were able to hold costs
down like they never did before or since. That's why no team moved for 50 years
and no player could go shopping for a job. But free agency and the ability to
move teams are here to stay so artificial stability no longer stands a chance. 

  George
61.2030MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonThu Nov 16 1995 19:3839
>  There have been several times in history when new leagues have started and
>failed long before reaching 30 teams total. Back in the 1870's the National
>Association folded, in the 1880's the American Association folded with a few
>teams jumping to the National League, in the teens the Federal League failed
>and on an on. More often than not when the total number of major league teams
>got to a certain level something gave.

 You can speculate that those leagues folded because there were too many
 teams, but I believe there were definately other reasons those teams/leagues
 went down the tubes.

>  It's different this time because the existing leagues are expanding rather
>than a new league starting up and that got them further but the instability
>we are seeing is there for the same reason. Only so many major league teams
>are viable at one time.

 The instability is for a completely different reason.  In this case, there
 is instability because there is a great DEMAND for teams.  Suppose that
 after this next period of franchise shifting is complete, there are no
 markets without franchises that want one.  Do you really think that the
 existing markets (which have paid a lot of money from their franchises, or
 find that the franchises create a number of new local businesses) are going
 to let their franchises shrivel up ?  I don't think so.

>> Leagues don't need parity -- otherwise MLB would have died in the
>> 30's and 40's, and the NBA would have died in the 70's.  I'm not even sure
>> fans prefer parity, quite frankly.
>
>  The 30's and 40's were a weird time for Major League baseball because the
>rules and laws allowed them to run a much more strict type of organization
>than they ever ran before or can ever run again. They were able to hold costs
>down like they never did before or since. That's why no team moved for 50 years
>and no player could go shopping for a job. But free agency and the ability to
>move teams are here to stay so artificial stability no longer stands a chance. 

 It's true that the 30's and 40's were different than now -- of course, they
 weren't any different than the 20's, teens, or 50's.  Even so, that's no proof
 that fans want parity.  I don't believe that they necessarily want parity,
 nor will be financially unsupportive of disparity.
61.2031ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 19:5627
    <<< Note 61.2030 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R "Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon" >>>

> You can speculate that those leagues folded because there were too many
> teams, but I believe there were definately other reasons those teams/leagues
> went down the tubes.

  The point is, there has never been a time when 30 major league baseball or
football teams have been able to survive. In fact before TV it was rare to see
a league with more than about 16 teams survive. Regardless of the reasons, the
economics have never been there to create a stable 30 team environment.

  When TV came along the numbers jumped quickly to the low 20s and when the
big TV contracts of the 80s came along they jumped to the high 20s but now
that TV is cutting back and the leagues are expanding from the high 20s to
30 they are suddenly acting very unstable. Coincidence? Maybe but I doubt it.

> It's true that the 30's and 40's were different than now -- of course, they
> weren't any different than the 20's, teens, or 50's.  Even so, that's no proof
> that fans want parity.  I don't believe that they necessarily want parity,
> nor will be financially unsupportive of disparity.

  Fans prove over and over again that they want parity. When ever teams fail to
remain competitive their fans shrink down and they are lucky to get 10,000
showing up at the park. With the exception of situations like the Mets and Cubs
very few teams can draw fans when they are not competitive. 

  George
61.2032MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonThu Nov 16 1995 20:099
>  Fans prove over and over again that they want parity. When ever teams fail to
>remain competitive their fans shrink down and they are lucky to get 10,000
>showing up at the park. With the exception of situations like the Mets and Cubs
>very few teams can draw fans when they are not competitive. 

 I agree that attendance will be lower for poorer teams; but, I don't believe
 revenues will be so much lower that teams are going to fold.  Moreover, with
 expanded playoff opportunities, there will be fewer and fewer cases of teams
 that are not at least occasionally competitive.
61.2033SLEEPR::ACMS_TESTBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 16 1995 20:1918
RE    <<< Note 61.2032 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R "Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon" >>>

> I agree that attendance will be lower for poorer teams; but, I don't believe
> revenues will be so much lower that teams are going to fold.

  We'll see. I agree, not for a while but if this instability continues it
will turn fans off to the sports in general and they will be dividing even
a smaller pie. Maybe something new will come along. Hope so.

>Moreover, with
> expanded playoff opportunities, there will be fewer and fewer cases of teams
> that are not at least occasionally competitive.

  Yes, but because of the high costs teams will have to spend a great deal more
money to be competitive on those occasions and the teams in weak markets will
really suffer.

  George
61.2034Lousy hockey at an exorbitant price and they still paySALEM::DODAMilk the BeatlesThu Nov 16 1995 20:567
    <<< Note 61.2020 by SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" >>>

>  The law of supply and demand is based on what people are willing to pay at
>the moment and has nothing to do with the wisdom of that decision or the
>likelihood that the demand will remain. 

to wit, Bruins fans.
61.2035CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Nov 17 1995 11:299
You could also look at that "before TV" thing as a travel-based reason also.

Before 1957, the National and American leagues were east of St. Louis.

More teams would have resulted in more travel, and travel was harder back then,
primarily by train......



61.2036IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Fri Nov 17 1995 11:371
And his name's not "Cam"!  He doesn't have that kind of money... :-) :-) :-)
61.2037CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Nov 17 1995 11:577
>
>And his name's not "Cam"!  He doesn't have that kind of money... :-) :-) :-)
>

People make that mistake a lot...  I get tired of saying anything so I
usually just let it go....

61.2039MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Fri Nov 17 1995 13:505
	How does it look close up, Karen?



	billl
61.2040CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Nov 17 1995 14:0312
>
>	How does it look close up, Karen?
>

Cam's nose flares to the west.  Pretty dramatically.

Mine has been broken, and something inside displaced slightly, courtesy of my
days on the rugby pitch, but it was a minor mishap, not, apparently, with the
same effect on Cam.


'Saw
61.2042CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Nov 17 1995 14:296
>    Thanks for saving me from having to answer that.  (-;


Anytime Karen.

If they'd been talking about Don Sweeney, I'd have left it up to you....
61.2043shame, shameMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Fri Nov 17 1995 14:3611
	I am disappointed that our "beloved" Browns fans,
	Hal and Groaner, have not had the gonads to jump in 
	here.

	Hail, JaKe, via net, has posted more notes in SPROTS
	lately than those two.

	


	billl
61.2044And base salary caps on the league you're inTNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasFri Nov 17 1995 14:5817
    Seems to me the English Soccer leagues do it right.  Only 20 teams in
    the Premier league, and the bottom four get relegated to the First
    Division, while the top four in that league move up.
    
    I suggest adding six more expansion teams to reach 36.  Have two
    leagues of 18 each.  Splite each league into two nine team divisions.
    Play everybody else once - 17 games.  Top four teams in each division
    make playoffs.  Bottom team in each division plus the team with the
    next worst record get relegated.
    
    Any team that has moved its franchise in the past 20 years
    automatically starts in the lower league.  All expansion teams in the
    last dozen years start in the lower league, as well as any sh*t team
    the ::SPROTS noters want to send down.
    
    NAZZ
     
61.2045ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Nov 17 1995 16:213
61.2046how's this taste?MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Nov 29 1995 21:2011
re .1750:

>   With or without Vinnie they'll have to play the Steelers twice --
>   sorry, but the Steelers won't make it out of the Wild Card round,
>   so Cleveland will only get to go 2-0 v.s. them this year.

	Hey, Groaner, any comment?



	billl
61.2047MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Nov 29 1995 21:2416
re .1774:

>   Preseason predictions -
    
>   Browns will go 10-6 or 11-5.
>   Browns will win the AFC Central.
>   Browns will make it to the AFC Championship game.
>   Ernest Hunter will surprise the league at RB.
>   Pittsburgh will eek out a wild card bid.


	Me thinks someone needs to do some serious
	dining at the Cafe le Crow Negro!


	billl
61.2048ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Nov 30 1995 10:243
61.2049Lame!SHARE::DERRYColor me impressed...Thu Nov 30 1995 10:351
    Aren't they playing SD this week?  
61.2050ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Nov 30 1995 17:012
61.2051SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 30 1995 17:3211
  If they are not the Browns what are they? They don't become the Baltimore
Browns until next year and maybe not even then.

  I read that about a week ago a state court in Ohio granted the city of
Cleveland a preliminary injunction preventing the Browns from moving until the
case goes to trial. There are some problems with the case however since it's
not clear that the city of Cleveland was party to the contract. There may
also be some jurisdictional issues. Since Baltimore is involved the case may
have to be moved to a Federal court.

  George
61.2052IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Thu Nov 30 1995 17:373
If I'm Bill Long and I hear this kind of "they're not the Browns" talk, I
smell some bet welshing on the horizon...
61.2053ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Nov 30 1995 17:415
61.2054MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 30 1995 17:437
    
    >> I read that about a week ago a state court in Ohio granted the 
    >> city of Cleveland a preliminary injunction preventing the Browns 
    
       Tagliabue has also gone before Congress and asked for legislation
       enabling the NFL to regulate franchise moves without the liability
       of anti-trust suits. 
61.2055IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Thu Nov 30 1995 17:468
>Bottom line, Art doesn't decide to move the team and the
>    Browns win the AFC Central.  No questions asked.

Of course not.  How can you ask any of a purely hypothetical situation?

The Megaplex discussion really affected the Patriots at the beginning of the
year, too.  No such uncertainty, and they win the AFC East.  No questions 
asked.  :-)
61.2056End result - rich get richerAKOCOA::BREENThu Nov 30 1995 17:547
    One would think this would be a no-brainer for Congress since it
    involves local governments competing against themselves to make greedy
    owners richer at the expense of tax payers.  I would hope they'd have
    enough sense to spread the wealth around to the benefit of hard working
    folks who'd like to see a game live who are being priced out.
    
    That said - I have very little hope.
61.2057OLD1S::CADZILLA2Running down a dreamThu Nov 30 1995 18:023
    
    I wonder why Baltimore would want the Browns. They have the CFL Grey
    Cup champs now. Why would they want the perennial 2nd place or worse Browns?
61.2058ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Nov 30 1995 18:543
61.2059SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 30 1995 19:0425
RE                      <<< Note 61.2056 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    One would think this would be a no-brainer for Congress since it
>    involves local governments competing against themselves to make greedy
>    owners richer at the expense of tax payers.  

  This being a conservative congress I would think that they would be reluctant
to regulate a business like pro football and would suggest that if tax payers
were not happy with the way local government was managing their money then
they should vote for someone else to hold office.

>I would hope they'd have
>    enough sense to spread the wealth around to the benefit of hard working
>    folks who'd like to see a game live who are being priced out.
    
  Here again, this is not the Republican way. Newt and company detest any
sort of wealth distribution and prefer to keep government out of the affairs
of businessmen. And I don't see Clinton expending any political capital on an
issue like Football.

  The political winds blowing the way they are my guess is that Congress will
tell professional football to work out their own problems and will tell tax
payers to take responsibility for whom they elect to local government.

  George
61.2060MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Thu Nov 30 1995 19:5810
>   I will honor my wagers, so Bill Long doesn't have to be drumming up
>   support.  Bottom line, Art doesn't decide to move the team and the
>   Browns win the AFC Central.  No questions asked.

	I don't recall "Art moving the team" being part
	of that wager.



	billl
61.2061MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Thu Nov 30 1995 20:0110
>  The political winds blowing the way they are my guess is that 
>Congress will tell professional football to work out their own 
>problems and will tell tax payers to take responsibility for whom 
>they elect to local government.

	Call me crazy, but I don't see anything wrong with any of that.



	billl
61.2062Second the motion, BilllMUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldFri Dec 01 1995 10:5211
>  The political winds blowing the way they are my guess is that Congress will
>tell professional football to work out their own problems and will tell tax
>payers to take responsibility for whom they elect to local government.

You don't have to be a conservative to feel this way.  I'm not and I do.

The temptation is almost overpowering to move to Baltimore just for the
pleasure of voting and campaigning against the idiots who handed Art
Modell the key to the city vaults.

Steve
61.2063words of wisdom from the 'burghMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Fri Dec 01 1995 19:5815
Tell Groaner and HAL that they will be welcome on the STEELER 
bandwagon with open arms as long as they have their lobotomies 
reversed and get castrated so's they don't try to hump the 
STEELER fans legs the way that Brown(spots)s(tm) fans are known 
to dry hump anything they can wrap their arms around.

Bummer that there will no longer be the great rivalry, but 
Clevescum don't deserve no NFL team.  The thing I like is that 
Clevescum will be able to say they have NEVER won a Super Bowl, 
ever never!!  HAHAHAHAHAHA

You cain post this in SPROTS, just remove the address, please.


JaKe
61.2064Groaner, I'm ashamed of you!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Dec 05 1995 12:2439
	I kinda figured something like this would happen....

Given (.1794):

>        Okay Groaner, it's time to put up or shutup.

>If'n (I mean 'When') the Steelers 'clinch' the division you must
>wear "I've always been a closet Steeler fan" until the Monday
>following the Super Bowl.

>If'n the Browns clinch (fat chance) I'll do the same.

>Knowing your traditional disappearing act happens as soon as
>the Browns are out of it, this shouldn't be too painful for you.


>billl

and (.1803)

>Okay, i'm in

Hard to beleive Groaner would enter eight notes yesterday,
a full 20 hours after the Steelers clinched the AFC Central,
Not a one of them had the agreed upon "I've always been
a closet Steeler fan" p-name.

There are several possible explanations for this:

	1) he didn't know the Steelers clinched (Yeah right)

	2) he forgot about the wager which I reminded him
of last week (not a chance)

	3) he decided to try an welch on the bet (probably)



billl
61.2065ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Dec 05 1995 12:418
    
>	1) he didn't know the Steelers clinched (Yeah right)
    
    I wouldn't bet against this.  I know that I've completely lost
    interest in the NFL this year, and couldn't have told you that the
    Steelers had clinched...
    
    Joe
61.2066ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Tue Dec 05 1995 13:453
61.2067MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Dec 05 1995 13:549
Excuses, excuses.

In this illustrious Teamlinks Notes I can't see 
what's there after the "I've always been a closet
Steeler fan" part of your p-name, but if it detracts
from the intent get it the hell out of there.


billl
61.2068CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Dec 05 1995 14:0510
Well, I can vouch for two teams clinching.

On Sunday evening's ESPN Prime Time, they reported that three teams had a
chance to clinch on Sunday:  Dallas, KC, Pittsburgh.  Only two did.

Dallas lost to Washington and thus did not clinch the NFC East.  The other two
teams won and clinched.


'Saw
61.2069ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Tue Dec 05 1995 15:473
61.2070MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Dec 05 1995 15:5010
like I said...I can't see the whole thing on my
system, just that there is more added on after the 
agreed upon characters.

Why not just tell me what it says and I'll be the 
judge of "nuff said".



billl
61.2071MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonTue Dec 05 1995 16:575
 <<< Note 61.2069 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI 
    "I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!" >>>


 Does this help ?
61.2072Time for another trial?MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Dec 05 1995 17:1320
> <<< Note 61.2069 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI 
>    "I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even 
>   though they suck!" >>>


> Does this help ?

	That's what I thought.  

	Groaner, is it seriously your intention to not
	live up to our wager?  Aren't you the one who
	dubbed TCM "The Crazy Welcher" when he did not
	live up to a p-name wager?

	No amount of your cheap basketball cards is gonna
	make up for this lack of cajones!



	billl
61.2073ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Tue Dec 05 1995 18:192
61.2074CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Dec 05 1995 18:2416
><<< Note 61.2073 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!" >>>
>
>    
>    I did live up to the wager.  You can not deny it.


In the letter of the wager if not the spirit.


I have to say, I think this one ranks up there with Bob Hunt's setting up of
the p-name on one node, and then noting from another for the course of the
week....


8^)

61.2075ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Tue Dec 05 1995 18:253
61.2076Take it like a man!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Dec 05 1995 18:315
	Groaner-the-Welcher, you're a wimp!



	billl
61.2077ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Tue Dec 05 1995 18:333
61.2078Groaner-the-WelcherMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Dec 05 1995 18:425
	What do I exect...like owner - like fans!



	billl
61.2079ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Tue Dec 05 1995 18:483
61.2080SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Dec 05 1995 18:504
  Didn't Bradshaw, Franko Harris, and that bunch win the Superbowl a couple
times back in the 70's?

  George
61.2081a new low for even GroanerMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longGronowski = Welcher ExtraordinaireTue Dec 05 1995 19:0510
	Just remember, your integrity, what little you
	ever posessed, is a measure of your word.

	When you find ways to renege on something as 
	simple as the intent of a p-name wager, one can
	only wonder how low you would stoop on anything
	of a serious nature.


	billl
61.2082MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Dec 05 1995 19:0630
    SHEESH... Take it like a man...
    
    FYI The only team that Clinched anything was Pittsburg, and the Cowboys
    could not have clinched... Had they won 11-2, they could have still
    ended up 11-5 tied with philly (1-1 head to head and Philly would have
    won the Tie Breaker on NFC record).  These announcers kill me they
    don't elimanate a team until its outright impossible but they try and
    HYPE up games that include SF/DAl etc saying they can clinch.  Pitt has
    the AFC Central (Ya thats tough swap The Steelers and the Pats and the
    pats are in 1st place, same for every other team in the afc east/west
    with the exception of the jets).
    
    If your not going to live up to PName bets don't make em....  As for
    cleveland moving I don't see why an owner should be kept from making
    extra bread by moving the team when players up and change teams weekly
    for more $$$. If you can't stop a player from doing it why should they
    create a law stopping teams/owner's from doing it.  And don't think the
    same thing that the Browns did doesn't happen every day.  My Uncle's
    companay (IN Mass won't give there name) employs thousands of people
    in massachusetts and was going to up and move to tennesee unless Mass
    gave them some HUGE tax breaks, last I knew they managed to BLACK MAIL
    Mass into giving them the breaks so they would stay instate....
    
    Put up or Shut up, cleveland could have gave him a counter offer, they
    could have improved his stadium but chose to take care of Basketball
    and baseball in front of football... I guess they'll pay the ultimate
    price and lose there NFL Franshise... Model is not who CLEVELAND should
    be mad at, get angry with all the greedy athlete's who pushed it to
    this point and be mad at themselves for putting football 3rd behind
    basketball and baseball...
61.2083BIGQ::MCKAYTue Dec 05 1995 19:115
    Is that a classic Groaner move or what?  too funny
    
    Groaner is the KING OF ALL LOOPHOLES
    
    Jimbo
61.2084HTH'sWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Dec 05 1995 19:134
    
    
       BTW I was the one who gave TCM the TCW moniker. He was a welcher too
    just like Groaner!!!
61.2085MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longGronowski = Welcher ExtraordinaireTue Dec 05 1995 19:139
 >> Pitt has the AFC Central (Ya thats tough swap The Steelers 
 >> and the Pats and the pats are in 1st place, same for every 
 >> other team in the afc east/west with the exception of the jets).

	Ya right!  Go back to your hero worship of His Airness.
	


	billl
61.2086MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longGronowski = Welcher ExtraordinaireTue Dec 05 1995 19:159
	I wasn't sure if it was you, Chappy, or Groaner.
	Thanks for clearing that up.

	Has anyone seen Groaner and TCM in the same place?




	billl
61.2087MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonTue Dec 05 1995 19:208
>                                           <<< Note 61.2082 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
>
>    FYI The only team that Clinched anything was Pittsburg, and the Cowboys
>    could not have clinched... 

     FYI, KC clinched by beating Oakland.  Moreover, with a victory the
     Cowboys would have clinched, as Philly could do no better than tie,
     and Cowboys win on third tie-breaking (common opponents, I believe).
61.2088OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Dec 05 1995 19:362
61.2089ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Tue Dec 05 1995 19:466
61.2090Bill's the main!BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Dec 05 1995 19:5323

	Note from bill when I asked for clarification on the Pname bet...



   <<< Note 61.1805 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Some gave all..." >>>

>	Kevin,
>	
>	I ain't no Clevescumite!  I would never do something as
>	dastardly as that.   ;^)
>
>	I actually noticed that after I posted it, but knew there
>	was no way I could stand the abuse I would take in here
>	if I was to welch on the intent of a p-name bet.
>
>
>	billl

	Groaner, be prepared for abuse for welching on the intent.

	Kevin
61.2091Proof!BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Dec 05 1995 19:5729
	
	The original pname challenge:

>   <<< Note 61.1794 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Some gave all..." >>>
>                      -< let the p-name wagers begin! >-
>
>	Okay Groaner, it's time to put up or shutup.
>
>	If'n (I mean 'When') the Steelers 'clinch' the division you must
>	wear "I've always been a closet Steeler fan" until the Monday
>	following the Super Bowl.
>
>	If'n the Browns clinch (fat chance) I'll do the same.
>
>	Knowing your traditional disappearing act happens as soon as
>	the Browns are out of it, this shouldn't be too painful for you.
>
>
>	billl


	Now, Bill said that Hal's pname had to be "I've always been a closet 
	Steeler fan".  Not "I've always been a closet Steeler fan .....".

	You lose Groaner.  Be a main.

	Kevin


61.2092MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longGronowski = Welcher ExtraordinaireTue Dec 05 1995 20:0215
extracted from .1794:

        If'n (I mean 'When') the Steelers 'clinch' the 
	division you must wear "I've always been a closet 
	Steeler fan" until the Monday following the Super Bowl.

Notice the quotes (beginning and ending).

Do what you want, Groaner, you've shown me your true color -

YELLOW



billl
61.2093SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Dec 06 1995 11:4814
RE<<< Note 61.2089 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!" >>>

>    To my knowledge, the Steelers have never won and NFL championship.
    
  Groner, I really don't care about this pname thing I'm just trying to
understand what you mean by this statement.

  Didn't the Steelers have a dominant team in the late 70's that won a few
Superbowls? That team with Terry Bradshaw, Franco Harris, Mean Joe Green,
Stalworth, Rockey Bliar ... who else ...

  Didn't they win NFL championships?

  George
61.2094ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 06 1995 11:563
61.2095SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Dec 06 1995 12:009
  Who told you that?

  I guess that for the first 4 years it was a playoff between the NFL and AFL
champion but since the merger along about Superbowl V it's been the NFL
championship game. 

  If it's not the NFL championship game what is?

  George
61.2096CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Dec 06 1995 12:095
What it is is the same old baloney that goes on in here all the time.

Give it a rest guys.  It's so old.

You're all creative people -- can't you find a NEW angle to dazzle us with????
61.2097Too early to concentrate on Basketball...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Dec 06 1995 13:3121
    (BILL)
    
    I wasn't kiddin about swapping the Pats or any other AFC team with 
    pittsburg.  If you look at (Buf, Indy, Mia, Pats, KC, Oak, Den, SD
    or Sea) they all have a better record then Cinncy, Hous, Clev or
    jack.  So like I said winning the AFC central this early is not a
    HUGE deal, the division SIPS.  Pitt has a winning record outside of
    there division (3-2) but 6 of there wins (Should have been 8) came
    vs the expansion division (Jac, brand new, clev soon to be balt, Hou
    soon to be Tenn and Im sure Cinncy will move too...).
    
    Pittsburg is one of the top 5 in the afc but anyone of 24other teams
    in the NFL could win that division this year, Id say Arz, NYG and
    Was are all better teams then the AFC Central as well.
    
    Who would have Thunk it... Baltimore could have the 1st pick in the
    draft next year :-) Jets have NE, Hou and NO so they could win another
    and all Baltimore has to do is lose to Jacksonville in WK17 (and lose
    WK15, 16) and they'll get the 1st pick :-)
    
    								mab
61.2098OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Dec 06 1995 14:273
61.2099MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longA day in infamyWed Dec 06 1995 15:025
	And you would expect differently from him?



	billl
61.2100SKIDMARK SNARFOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Dec 06 1995 17:321
61.2101CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westWed Dec 06 1995 22:138
    
    Boy, now I'm confused.  This year the NFL is playing in Superbowl XXX
    (that's 30 for Roman Numeral Illiterates)  It will be played in 1996,
    so Superbowl I, must have been in 1967.  The Steelers won *4*
    superbowls since that year.  How could anyone say they haven't won one?
    
    Marc
    
61.2102MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longA day in infamyThu Dec 07 1995 12:167
	Marc,

	You have to consider the source, Welchowski(tm).



	billl
61.2103Rollward...WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Dec 07 1995 12:254
    
    
    
    Welchowski.... :-)
61.2104MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Dec 08 1995 16:5320
    Now now now.. Here in NewEngland were somewhat spoiled with the
    Celtics bringing oh so many championships to the area.  But when you
    live in some other cities (Wont mention any names) you have to
    really REACH (I MEAN REACH) in order to come up with examples of
    a winning team.  Won guy use to brag about winning the championship
    in Foozeball, or was it table tennis... It was one of those wannabe
    sports.  Back before the superbowl when the had 2 teams in the league
    they called it the NFL(Neighborhood Football League) Championship and
    the Cleveland Browns won a few of them vs teams like the VFW Vets,
    xxx state pee wee champs and some other quality teams....
    
    When you talk/think about the greatest teams in Football History to
    me only 3 come to mind, Steelers, Cowboys and (HATE TO ADMIT THIS 1)
    The 49ers.  I know GB won the 1st 2 SB's but I put these 3 teams 
    ahead of them (Sorry packer fans).
    
    If I had to pick which teams was the best of all time I think giving
    that Pittsburg won like 3or4 over a 4-5 years stretch Id have to say
    that was the best Team/Coaching Staff/etc every in Football... or maybe
    the 1995 PATRIOTS :-)
61.2105or was it '73 and '74? - the mind fadesMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Dec 08 1995 17:105
	Actually, the Steelers won SuperBowls in '74,'75,
	'78 and '79.


	billl
61.2106MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Dec 08 1995 17:155
    Im glad someone else can't remember, ALL I could remember for sure
    was it was definatly 4, all were in the 70's and no 3peats.  Just
    out of curiosity does anyone know if a good chunk of the 1st Pitt
    SB team was still around for the 4rth one ???? 
    								MaB
61.2107MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Dec 08 1995 17:466
	Actually checked after I posted...

	I was right at first: 74,75,78 and 79.


	billl
61.2108ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Fri Dec 08 1995 18:153
61.2109Hmm..MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Dec 08 1995 18:375
    Boy I just know Im going to regret this... but... .WHAT ??? Im
    very confused by that last statement ?  The Celtics have always
    been the celtics ?  And the Celtics were competative and won in
    the 80's as well (no one hit wonder).
    								mab
61.2110smoke, mirrors, technicalities...SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!!Fri Dec 08 1995 19:2717
    The Celtics owners of some years past 'traded' franchises with what was
    then the Buffalo Braves [?].  It was how the Celtics came to enjoy the
    services of Bob McAdoo, Ernie D., and I think perhaps Curtis Rowe
    and/or Marvin Barnes.  Then, the Buffalo owner re-located the team to
    [originally San Deigo then to?] LA.
    
    So on a technicality, the statement is correct.  What is also correct,
    is that Boston still has an NBA basketball club called the Celtics, who
    retained the banners to be hung in the rafters of the Boston Garden
    [and subsequently moved to the Fleet Center].
    
    It is appropriate to note that all those old Celtics numbers that have
    been retired still remain in Boston, not in LA.  Some Clipper can wear
    numbers 6 or 33 or a bunch of others that the current Celtics players
    can not.
    
    	Ted
61.2111Super Bowl [or NFL Championship..whatever] historySALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!!Fri Dec 08 1995 19:3255
	Twenty different teams have participated in the Super Bowl games.
	Their super records:

	San Francisco	5-0		Kansas City	1-1
	Pittsburgh	4-0		Miami		2-3
	Green Bay	2-0		New England	0-1
	N.Y. Giants	2-0		Philadelphia	0-1
	N.Y. Jets	1-0		L.A. Rams	0-1
	Chicago		1-0		San Diego	0-1
	Oakland		3-1		Cincinnati	0-2
	Washington	3-2		Buffalo		0-4
	Dallas		4-3		Minnesota	0-4		
	Baltimore	1-1		Denver		0-4

	The average margin of victory has been 16.9 points.  Twenty-two
	games were decided by 10 or more points.  Only 3 games were decided 
	by a field-goal or less; 4 others were decided by a touchdown or 
	less and more than a field-goal. 


			Super Bowl History

    1967	Super Bowl I		Green Bay 35, Kansas City 10
    1968	Super Bowl II		Green Bay 34, Oakland 14
    1969	Super Bowl III		New York Jets 16, Baltimore 7
    1970	Super Bowl IV		Kansas City 23, Minnesota 7
    1971	Super Bowl V		Baltimore 16, Dallas 13
    1972	Super Bowl VI		Dallas 23, Miami 3
    1973	Super Bowl VII		Miami 14, Washington 7
    1974	Super Bowl VIII		Miami 24, Minnesota 10
    1975	Super Bowl IX		Pittsburgh 16, Minnesota 6
    1976	Super Bowl X		Pittsburgh 21, Dallas 17
    1977	Super Bowl XI		Oakland 34, Minnesota 14
    1978	Super Bowl XII		Dallas 27, Denver 10
    1979	Super Bowl XIII		Pittsburgh 35, Dallas 31
    1980	Super Bowl XIV		Pittsburgh 34, Los Angeles Rams 19
    1981	Super Bowl XV		Oakland 27, Philadelphia 10
    1982	Super Bowl XVI		San Francisco 23, Cincinnati 21
    1983	Super Bowl XVII		Washington 27, Miami 17
    1984	Super Bowl XVIII	Oakland 38, Washington 9
    1985	Super Bowl XIX		San Francisco 38, Miami 16
    1986	Super Bowl XX		Chicago 46, New England 10
    1987	Super Bowl XXI		New York Giants 39, Denver 20
    1988    	Super Bowl XXII		Washington 42, Denver 10
    1989	Super Bowl XXIII	San Francisco 20, Cincinnati 16
    1990	Super Bowl XXIV		San Francisco 55, Denver 10    
    1991	Super Bowl XXV		New York Giants 20, Buffalo 19
    1992	Super Bowl XXVI		Washington 37, Buffalo 24
    1993	Super Bowl XXVII	Dallas 52, Buffalo 17
    1994	Super Bowl XXVIII	Dallas 30, Buffalo 13
    1995	Super Bowl XXIX		San Francisco 49, San Diego 26

					Winner total 895, Loser total 406
					Winner avg. 30.9, Loser avg. 14.0

61.2112ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Fri Dec 08 1995 19:358
61.2113The latest move I've heard...FABSIX::E_MAXWELLThe Land Of The Stainless MaidenSat Dec 09 1995 00:347
     Anybody like the latest rumor??  tampa bay to cleveland.
    The t.b. owner isn't happy with the way the city is not                
    showing support to keep them there. The cleveland buccaneers,
    the baltimore browns, what a joke. Does this mean the groaner
    will become a bucs fan? Or will he jump ship to baltimore?;-)
    
                                             Lil Ed
61.2114ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsSat Dec 09 1995 01:385
    
    _If_ it happens, expect the Bucs to take the Browns name, colors,
    etc.
    
    Joe
61.2115I doubt itCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Dec 11 1995 14:075
    
    Cleveland would be getting a better team if the deal goes through....
    Will they also switch divisional alignments?
    
    mike
61.2116NQOS01::nqsrv324.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYMon Dec 11 1995 15:452
No, Paul, by your distorted logic, the Browns will be in Baltimore.  However, 
everyone else will believe them to be in Cleveland.
61.2117ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Mon Dec 11 1995 21:024
61.2118SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Mon Jan 08 1996 15:036
    
    	Mel Kiper has the Browns selecting Lawrence Phillips with the #4
    pick in the draft. His 1st four picks are Keyshawn Johnson #1, Kevin
    Hurdy LB #2, Jonathan Ogden OL #3.
    
    Ron
61.2119IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Jan 08 1996 15:304
>    	Mel Kiper has the Browns selecting Lawrence Phillips with the #4
>    pick in the draft.

Art Modell gets what he deserves...
61.2120ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Mon Jan 08 1996 17:094
61.2121load 'em upHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 09 1996 13:046
>    ... They need a big time
>    running back.

Yeah, to help pack the moving van.

TTom
61.2122ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Tue Jan 09 1996 20:3712
61.2123OLD1S::CADZILLA2Jus scuttle buttin with StevieRayTue Jan 09 1996 20:544
    
    
    If he sells, is the buyer bond to stay in Cleveland? If not sell to
    his brother for a dollas and have him move it etc;  
61.2124I have to force myself to pull my punches here, actually...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 09 1996 21:0611
>    He's committed suicide basically.  
    
    Well, Modell is an old man, and has lived a full life of vileness
    and putrescence.  Very similar to Tiger Bob Irsay, just hanging on 
    after that very unfortunate heart attack.  Of course the bad news
    for Baltimore Colts fans is that that psychopath (unlike Modell,
    Irsay had/has documented behavioral problems) has progeny...
    
    glenn
    
61.2125IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Jan 10 1996 12:006
>    Of course the bad news
>    for Baltimore Colts fans is that that psychopath (unlike Modell,
>    Irsay had/has documented behavioral problems) has progeny...

Unlike his father, Jim Irsay has only displayed incompetence, not serious
behavioral problems...
61.2126The Raven(s)CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Apr 29 1996 13:47129
The Raven(s), with apologies to Edgar Allan Poe

Once upon a midnight dreary, while they pondered, weak and weary,
Over many a quaint and curious kegs of bitters that they poured,
While they nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,
As of someone gently rapping, rapping at their bar room door.
" 'Tis some visitor," they muttered, "tapping at our bar room door;
Only this, and nothing more."

How distinctly they remember, it was in the bleak December,
And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor.
Eagerly they wished the morrow; vainly they had sought to borrow
From their keg surcease of sorrow, sorrow for the shirts they wore,
For the rare and treasured team the owners sent to Baltimore
Nameless here forevermore.

And the silken sad uncertain rustling of each purple curtain
Thrilled them---filled them with fantastic terrors never felt before;
So that now, to still the beating of their heart, they stood repeating,
" 'Tis some visitor entreating entrance at their bar room door,
Some late visitor entreating entrance at their bar room door.
This it is, and nothing more."

Presently their soul grew stronger; hesitating then no longer,
"Sir," they said , "or madam, truly your forgiveness we implore;
But the fact is, we were napping, and so gently you came rapping,
And so faintly you came tapping, tapping at our bar room door,
That we scarce were sure we heard you." Here they opened wide the door;---
Darkness there, and nothing more.

Deep into the darkness peering, long they stood there, wondering, fearing
Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortals ever dared to dream before;
But the silence was unbroken, and the stillness gave no token,
And the only word there spoken was the whispered "Baltimore"
This they whispered, and an echo murmured back of 
"Baltimore", Merely this, and nothing more.

Back into the bar room turning, all their soul within them burning,
Soon again they heard a tapping, something louder than before,
"Surely," said they, "surely, that is something at the window lattice.
Let us see, then, what it is, and this mystery explore.
Let our hearts be still a moment, and this mystery explore.
" 'Tis the wind, and nothing more."

Open here they flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
In there stepped a stately raven, of the saintly days of yore.
Not the least obeisance made he; not a minute stopped or stayed he;
But with mien of lord or lady, perched above their bar room door.
Perched upon a bust of Modell, just above their bar room door,
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.

Then this ebony bird beguiling their sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
"Though thy crest be shorn and shaven thou," they said, "art sure no craven,
Ghastly, grim, and ancient raven, wandering from the nightly shore.
Tell us what the lordly name is on the Night's Plutonian shore."
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore."

Much they marveled this ungainly fowl to hear discourse so plainly,
Though its answer little meaning, little relevancy bore;
For we cannot help agreeing that no living human being
Ever yet was blessed with seeing bird above his bar room door,
Bird or beast upon the sculptured bust above his bar room door,
With such name as "Nevermore."

But the raven, sitting lonely on that placid bust, spoke only
That one word, as if his soul in that one word he did outpour.
Nothing further then he uttered; not a feather then he fluttered;
Till they scarcely more than muttered,"Other friends have flown before;
On the morrow he will leave us, as their hopes have flown before."
Then the bird said,"Nevermore."

Startled at the stillness broken by reply so aptly spoken,
"Doubtless," said they, "what it utters is its only stock and store,
Caught from some unhappy master, whom unmerciful disaster
Followed fast and followed faster, till his songs one burden bore,---
Till the dirges of his hope that melancholy burden bore
Of "Never---nevermore."

But the raven still beguiling all their fancy into smiling,
Straight they wheeled on cushioned seats in front of bird and bust and door;,
Then, upon the velvet sinking, they betook themselves to linking
Fancy unto fancy, thinking what this ominous bird of yore,
What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt, and ominous bird of yore
Meant in croaking, "Nevermore."

Thus they sat engaged in guessing, but no syllable expressing
To the fowl, whose fiery eyes now burned into their bosom's core;
This and more they sat divining, with their heads at ease reclining
On the cushion's velvet lining that the TV gloated o'er,
But whose velvet violet lining with the TV gloating o'er
shall be pressed, ah, nevermore!

Then, they thought, the air grew denser, perfumed from an unseen censer
Swung by seraphim whose footfalls tinkled on the tufted floor.
"Wretch," they cried, "thy God hath lent thee -- by these angels he hath
Sent thee respite---respite and nepenthe from thy memories of Baltimore
Quaff, O quaff this kind nepenthe, and forget this lost Baltimore!"
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore!"

"Prophet!" said they, "thing of evil!--prophet still, if bird or devil!
Whether tempter sent, or whether tempest tossed thee here ashore,
Desolate, yet all undaunted, on this desert land enchanted--
On this home by horror haunted--tell us truly, we implore:
Is there--is there balm in Cleveland?--tell us--tell us they implore!"
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore."

"Prophet!" said they, "thing of evil--prophet still, if bird or devil!
By that heaven that bends above us--by that God we both adore--
Tell these soul with sorrow laden, if, within the distant Aidenn,
We shall cheer our sainted Browns, whom the owners sent to Baltimore---
Cheer our rare and radiant Browns, whom the owners sent to Baltimore?
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore."

"Be that word our sign of parting, bird or fiend!" they shrieked, upstarting--
"Get thee back into the tempest and the Night's Plutonian shore!
Leave no black plume as a token of that lie thy soul spoken!
Leave our loneliness unbroken! -- quit the bust above our door!
Take thy beak from out our hearts, and take thy form from off our door!"
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore."

And the raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting
On the pallid bust of Modell just above their bar room door;
And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming.
And the lamplight o'er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor;
And their souls from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor
Shall be lifted---nevermore!

  George
61.2127No more rivalryBSS::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Tue Apr 30 1996 04:3020
      Belated,
    
      Too Hal and Paul,
    
      As much as it pains me to say this, I really think you  fans for the
    Brownies got screwed, regardless of you getting a NEW team some year.
        
      I would be very disappointed if Blowland moved the Broncos, so I can
    only immagine how you guys felt.
    
      I will for one will miss my Broncos beating the lowly Browns.
    
      On the bright side, when Cleveland gets a new team, maybe they will
    have a Qb.
    
      I don't know if you will root for Ravens or just your favorite
    players, but to me the Cleveland Browns name and sand stadium should 
    R.I.P. forever, too never be used again!
    
      Tim
61.2129IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue Apr 30 1996 12:271
That's OK - I hear fellow criminal Christian Peter is available...
61.2130CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Apr 30 1996 12:3014
Re         <<< Note 61.2127 by BSS::JACKSON "Set the drag just right!" >>>

>      I don't know if you will root for Ravens or just your favorite
>    players, but to me the Cleveland Browns name and sand stadium should 
>    R.I.P. forever, too never be used again!
    
  You may get your wish on the Stadium. The latest rumor I heard was that
they were considering tearing the old one down and building the new stadium
on that site.

  But you will probably lose on the name. If there is a new team the rumor
is that they will be the Browns.

  George
61.2131POWDML::GARBARINOTue Apr 30 1996 15:442
I thought the Browns name staying in Cleveland was a done-deal...part of
the NFL's/Modell's settlement with the city of Cleveland.
61.2133CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Apr 30 1996 16:045
  Isn't L.A. getting the Seahawks?

  Or did that fall through?

  George
61.2134MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Tue Apr 30 1996 16:098
Paul Allen, owner of the Trailblazers and co-founder of Microsoft,
has bought an option to buy the team.  I think that there are some
stadium issues to be resolved (renovate/build) before he will buy
the team.

I think that they are at least staying put for the 96 season.

Mike
61.2136could happen???BSS::MENDEZTue Apr 30 1996 21:293
    I heard somewhere (american::football??) that the 9ers could be
    a candidate to move to the mistake by the lake...
    
61.2137no No NOBSS::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Tue Apr 30 1996 21:465
        If the 9'rs did move to Cleveland, which I don't think they
    would, I would get to read about all the tradition that the team has
    and how many Superbowl victories they have;-)
    
      Tim
61.2138clevesum fortywhiners?OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsTue Apr 30 1996 21:511
    
61.2139ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed May 01 1996 12:259
    
>    I heard somewhere (american::football??) that the 9ers could be
>    a candidate to move to the mistake by the lake...
    
    Actually, that would make some sense; DeBartolo's from Youngstown.
    As nice as it would be to have a team of the quality of the 49ers
    in Cleveland, I hope it doesn't happen...
    
    Joe
61.2140BSS::MENDEZWed May 01 1996 16:115
    being a 9er fan I too hope it does not happen. On the other hand
    maybe the AFC would finally win a superbowl!!!!
    
    And of course it would hae to be against the cow pies...
    
61.2141CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 16:189
  I don't think there is any guarantee that if a new team becomes the Cleveland
Browns that they will be in the AFC. Most likely if the '49ers moved to
Cleveland and changed their name to the Browns they would still be in the
NFC West.

  I can't think of a time that a football or baseball team moved and changed
leagues or conferences at the same time.

  George
61.2142ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 01 1996 17:484
    
    If'n the 9ers move to Cleveland to become the Browns, look at all the
    championships we can claim (using the George method).
    
61.2143CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 18:018
  No, using my method people in San Francisco will be able to claim Cleveland's
championships.

  Which leaves me wondering, what do you mean by "we"? Do you still live in
Cleveland? Using your method, if you've left Cleveland you should have no claim
on their championships.

  George
61.2144ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 01 1996 18:332
    
    George, do you live in Boston?
61.2145CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 18:374
  Yup.

  George
61.2146what is happening to credibility in SPROTS!ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 01 1996 18:515
    
    George, Boston is spelled "B" "O" "S" "T" "O" "N", *NOT*
    "B" "R" "I" "G" "H" "T" "O" "N".
    
    'nuff said... 
61.2147CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 19:0215
  Paul now you are the one living in the past.

  Brighton was incorporated into the City of Boston around the turn of the
century. When I registered to vote it was at Boston City hall. When my car
caught fire in front of my house the Boston Fire Department came.

  When an egg head valdalized our car in front of our house the Boston
Police department responded. The City of Boston picks up our trash, plows
our street and last time I voted in a city election I pulled the switch for
Mayor Tom Menino.

  Brighton is just as much a part of Boston as the South End, Dorchester,
Roxbury or Jamaca Plain.

  George
61.2148And now...looks like Belicheck will own the pats...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed May 01 1996 19:508
    
    
    	Believe it or not, The Browns are still putting out the BNI.
    	I just got mine the other day.  Sad...very sad...
    
    	I'll try and post some of the articles when I get some free time.
    
    	GRRRRRRRRRRR!
61.2149CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westWed May 01 1996 21:5722
    
    >  Brighton is just as much a part of Boston as the South End,
    >Dorchester, Roxbury or Jamaca Plain.
    
    Sigh!  Nothing against what you said George, but I can't stand stuff
    like this crap that occurs in the ole U.S. of A.   Boston is 7 square
    miles and does not include these new districts.  "Boston" does include
    those locations.
    
    Same thing with Denver, Los Angeles, Dallas/Fort Worth...I'd bet that
    Los Angeles (proper) has less than 1 million people living there. 
    However, the surrounding towns/cities/districts/whatever decide to JOIN
    the city limits and suddenly the city is over 100 square miles.
    
    In my opinion, this is totally sickening and the towns/cities/districts
    should not be allowed to keep their name.
    
    As a somewhat small proof as to what I am saying, the Post Office does
    NOT recognize that dorchestor/Roxbury... are part of Boston.
    
    Marc
    
61.2150ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 02 1996 11:182
    
    Brighton is not Boston, otherwise it would be called Boston.
61.2151CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 12:4423
  Brighton became a separate town when it split off from Cambridge at the
beginning of the 19th century and for almost 100 years it was built up as a
separate township. Part of that development was to build streets and roads and
part of building those streets and roads involved giving them names like Park
Street, Tremont Street, Washington Street and other names already used in
Boston. 

  When the township was revoked and Brighton became part of Boston they didn't
want to change all the street names to make them unique so for practical
reasons the Post Office which is part of the Federal Government calls the area
"Brighton" and that name is used on your address. That way if you live on
Washington Street in Brighton and have an unfortunate address, your mail doesn't
get sent to the Naked I in Boston's Combat Zone. 

  But from the point of view of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts there is no
Town or City of Brighton. We are residents of Boston, our kids go to Boston
schools, we pay Boston taxes and we vote for Boston city officials. 

  I live in Boston.

  By the way, why are we talking about this? I forget.

  George
61.2152HTHWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu May 02 1996 13:1410
    
    
    Bronx = NYC
    Queens = NYC
    Brooklyn = NYC
    Manhatten = NYC
    Staten Island = NYC
    
    
    
61.2153ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 02 1996 13:296
    
    >our kids go to Boston schools
    
    My condolences.  I'm moving out of Leominster because of the schools...
    and the Leominster school district looks like a world class district
    compared to Boston.
61.2154I have no idea what this meansHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu May 02 1996 13:396
    Bronx = NYC = Cheers
    Queens = NYC = would be Kings if'n 
    Brooklyn = NYC = Bridges
    Manhatten = NYC = Jaspers
    Staten Island = NYC = Richmond
61.2155Sprawled into empty spaceMUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldFri May 03 1996 14:5919
.2149, Marc:

>    Same thing with Denver, Los Angeles, Dallas/Fort Worth...I'd bet that
>    Los Angeles (proper) has less than 1 million people living there. 
>    However, the surrounding towns/cities/districts/whatever decide to JOIN
>    the city limits and suddenly the city is over 100 square miles.

Depends on what you mean by Los Angeles.  If you mean the original pueblo,
the population might be 500.  But if you mean the current city limits,
which have not changed significantly in years, it's somewhere between three
and four million.  The metropolitan area runs anywhere from 12 to 15 M
(I'm out of touch), and includes bordering cities like Inglewood, Glendale,
Pasadena, etc., and enclaves like Beverly Hills and West Hollywood (which is
an unincorporated part of LA County).  Many of the individual neighborhoods
within the city bear identifying names (Hollywood being the best known), but
they have not been political entities.  LA didn't grow by annexing smaller
cities, it grew into open space.  And grew.  And grew.  And grew.

Steve
61.2156NQOS01::nqsrv331.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYFri May 03 1996 16:054
Groaner and George needed another nit to argue over, and this is a great 
place for it.  Thanks to all for the help.

brews
61.2157The "NEW" Browns!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Jun 17 1996 18:2017
    
    	Reports are that the new Cleveland Stadium will be built at the
    	same location as the old Stadium.  Consider it a done deal!
    
    	Cleveland's new team.....get ready....consider this one a done deal
    	too.  Tampa orange will soon turn to Cleveland Brown!  Suposibly,
    	Tampa residents won't approve the funds for a new stadium.  They
    	dropped the raise on rental cars and now look for a vote on
    	increasing some other tax by 1/2 cent in September but everyone
    	is not giving it much of a chance.  
    
    	There is a very good chance that Tampa will come to Cleveland 
    	sooner that than expected too.  Ohio State University is willing
    	to let the Browns play there until the new stadium is completed.
    
    
    	WOOF!!!
61.2158I LIKE THE BUCS!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Jun 17 1996 18:2311
    
    
    	oh yea.... 
    
    		Tampa has already told the Buc's owner they will not
    	file court papers if they move the team earlier than the last
    	contract too.  
    
    
    	WOOF!	WOOF!	WOOF!
    
61.2159OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsMon Jun 17 1996 18:254
    
    
    Sounds like Cleveland gets hosed again. The Browns leave and
    now they get the Buc's as a replacement. From bad to pathetic.
61.2160They will be in Cleveland next year!!!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Jun 17 1996 18:2911
    
    	No way, the 95 Browns stank!!!!
    
    	The 95 Bucs are going up!
    
    		They have some great prospects, I just don't know their
    	names yet.....heheheheheheheh!
    
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.2161Rumored reports allegedly make deal official...keep the faithEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryMon Jun 17 1996 19:369
>    	Reports are that the new Cleveland Stadium will be built at the
>    	same location as the old Stadium.  Consider it a done deal!
    
    Gotta love Hal's amazing powers of deduction...
    
    
    glenn
    
61.2162HOLDING THINGS UPSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Jun 17 1996 20:089
    
    
    	Glenn,
    		You don't know the half of it....the City Government wanted
    	to use the site for downtown development not for a new stadium.  so
    	there!
    
    
    		WOOF!
61.2163IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jun 17 1996 20:514
>    		You don't know the half of it....the City Government wanted
>    	to use the site for downtown development not for a new stadium.

Those cretins!
61.2164THEMAX::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Tue Jun 18 1996 00:023
      The buckin brown spots still won't get to the superbowl!
    
      Tim
61.2165'nuff saidROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 18 1996 13:042
    
    Have the donks ever won and NFL Championship?
61.2166BaitTHEMAX::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Tue Jun 18 1996 18:188
      How many times do I have to tell you no?  Maybe your node name is
    whatcha got for memory cells in that cranium;-)
    
      Now I do have a question for ya Paul.  If the buc-in-the-rears do
    move to Cleveland, will you become a "fan" of that team no matter their
    name?
    
      Tim
61.2167ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 18 1996 21:543
    
    The team name will be the Browns and yes, I will root for that team.
    
61.2168THEMAX::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Wed Jun 19 1996 00:061
      Will you also root for the Ravens?
61.2169ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jun 19 1996 00:445
    
    I'll root for the Ravens until Cleveland gets a team... but I won't
    pretend like the Ravens are Cleveland's team, unlike some other people
    in here...
    
61.2170CHEFS::7A1_GRNGo GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic teamWed Jun 19 1996 09:265
    I don't think anybody else in here *will* pretend that the Ravens are 
    Cleveland's team.
    
    
    CHARLEY
61.2171i know the answerAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherWed Jun 19 1996 15:465
    
    
     So Paul the season after the Buc-in-the-rears move to Cleveland and
    become the Browns you will chance your allegiance from the Ravens to
    the Browns.  Is that bandwagon jumping.:*)
61.2172ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jun 19 1996 15:515
    
    Jerry, maybe you ought to discuss the bandwagon crap with George.  The
    Braves moved when he was like 5 years old but he still claims he was a
    fan because the older kids in the neighborhood who used to beat the
    crap out of him all the time, liked the Braves.
61.2173SNAX::ERICKSONWed Jun 19 1996 17:165
    
    	Which means we can say, Have the Browns every won an NFL
    championship? NOT, Have the Ravens won a championship, YES.
    
    Ron
61.2174check with a real BrownHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Jun 19 1996 17:174
What's Jim Brown got to say about all this?

So far, I haven't heard that he's chaning his name to Ahmed Ravens or the
like...
61.2175EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Jun 19 1996 17:2310
    
>    Which means we can say, Have the Browns every won an NFL
>    championship? NOT, Have the Ravens won a championship, YES.
    
    Those are George's rules, not Paul's.  You're getting the 'wagoning
    principles confused again.  It's a highly complex process to follow,
    but it cain be done...
    
    glenn
    
61.2176ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jun 19 1996 17:269
    
    No, the Browns have won NFL championships, but the team now is building
    a new history in Baltimore and only clowns or people dying for a
    championship would claim any future championships in Baltimore for the
    city of Cleveland.
    
    A little clue about why George claims to be a Braves fan - when did the
    Red Sox last win the World Series?  "nuff said
    
61.2177MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 19 1996 17:453
    I'd hardly call switching allegiance to the 'bucs as hitching onto any
    bandwagon.  My prediction is that Paul will root for both until one has
    emerged successful.
61.2178ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jun 19 1996 17:476
    
    Well you don't have a clue then.  I already said I root for the Ravens
    until another team shows up in Cleveland.  Just because you're hard up
    for a championship and jump bandwagons left and right, doesn't mean
    everyone else does as well.
    
61.2179Rules? I don't need no steenk'n rulesMKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 19 1996 18:1915
    Well as you know there is an outside chance that if and when Tampa
    moves to Cleveland they may be pretty good so we'll never know. 
    Personally I root wherever my fancy takes me.  For example I rooted
    real hard for Seattle in games 4-7; I've loved the way UMass played the
    game; I rooted for Pitt mildly in the Superbowl until I observed the
    courageous and skilled effort that O'Donnell exhibited.
    
    Rules:  I always root for the A.L. vs N.L. and usually AFC vs NFC.
    Mostly I like to find an up and coming underdog with some feature
    especially when they play the game that way I like them to play.
    
    Personally I don't like the way the RedSox play the game but prefer to
    see them win.  I do like the way the Yankees play the game.  I rooted
    fairly strongly for Cleveland to beat Atlanta but I feel they deserved
    to lose for not taking my early advice about acquiring a lefthander.
61.2180POWDML::GARBARINOWed Jun 19 1996 20:221
who's the idiot that picked the name "Ravens" ?
61.2181CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jun 19 1996 20:3410
RE                     <<< Note 61.2176 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

>    A little clue about why George claims to be a Braves fan - when did the
>    Red Sox last win the World Series?  "nuff said
    
  According to your rules, when I became a Braves fan back in '91 they had
never won a Championship.

  Nuf Ced,
  George
61.2182CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jun 19 1996 20:438
RE                    <<< Note 61.2180 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>

>who's the idiot that picked the name "Ravens" ?

  Most likely it was picked because Edgar Alan Poe, who wrote "The Raven",
lived in Baltimore.

  George
61.2183keep on tweekin'THEMAX::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Wed Jun 19 1996 21:554
      Ok, so Paul, are you going to also root on the buc-in-the-rears as
    well as hope they continue their life long building program?
    
      Tim  
61.2184POWDML::GARBARINOThu Jun 20 1996 13:194
>  Most likely it was picked because Edgar Alan Poe, who wrote "The Raven",
>lived in Baltimore.

Thanks.  I knew there had to be a football connection somewhere...
61.2185CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 20 1996 13:418
  Well, lots of teams have names that have nothing to do with the sport.

  To think of a few: Patriots, Jets, Colts, Bills, Dolphins ...

  Come to think of it, how many NFL team names really have anything to do with
football?

  George
61.2186severalHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 20 1996 13:577
How bout the Indianapolis Colts? They was named after the Baltimore Colts
who were a football team.

Same goes for the Rams, named after a couple of football teams, and the
Cardinals, ditto.

TTom
61.2187POWDML::GARBARINOThu Jun 20 1996 14:025
Yeah, there are some very weak names out there, but most were inherited.
You'd think that a new team would come up with a better name than "Ravens".
To me, it's a marketing handicap for a football team.

For an ice skating team it would work...
61.2188CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 20 1996 14:1113
Re        <<< Note 61.2186 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>

>How bout the Indianapolis Colts? They was named after the Baltimore Colts
>who were a football team.

  Right, but where did Baltimore get the name Colts? Sure some of the names
can be traced back to the name the team had before they moved but when they
took the name in their original town it had nothing to do with football.

  Even Ram is wrong because if a football player did what a ram does they'd
throw a flag for spearing.

  George
61.2189CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 20 1996 14:1417
RE                    <<< Note 61.2187 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>

>Yeah, there are some very weak names out there, but most were inherited.
>You'd think that a new team would come up with a better name than "Ravens".
>To me, it's a marketing handicap for a football team.
>For an ice skating team it would work...

  Have you ever seen a real Raven? In fact they are one bad ass bird.

  If you are ever in London go check out the Tower and you'll see what I mean.
Those things are huge and the guards that run the tours are very careful to
tell you to keep your hands away from the birds unless you want to see one
of your fingers get flown off to the nearest tree.

  I remember watching one tear a drum stick apart and it wasn't pretty.

  George
61.2190As long as it ends in an SMKOTS3::BREENThu Jun 20 1996 14:188
    I think today we're going to go where sprots has never gone before;
    opening the door named ridiculous, into the realm of absurd followed by
    a flight of pure zaniness.  
    
    Btw, isn't the New Haven minor league baseball team also the Ravens. 
    Did Poe sleep there one night?
    
    
61.2191IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Jun 20 1996 14:184
>  Right, but where did Baltimore get the name Colts?

Isn't Maryland a hotbed of horse racing?  The Preakness is there,
Bowie racetrack, etc.
61.2192a real connectionHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 20 1996 14:2511
>Isn't Maryland a hotbed of horse racing?  The Preakness is there,
>Bowie racetrack, etc.

And the football players bet on the horses...

Actually the Edgar Allen Poe connection is the football players share his
passion for doing drugs. A little belladonna afore the game and you're
good to go. Some myristica frangrens at time out. Then back to the
dressing room to fix up at half time.

TTom
61.2193CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jun 20 1996 14:2826
>    I think today we're going to go where sprots has never gone before;
>    opening the door named ridiculous, into the realm of absurd followed by
>    a flight of pure zaniness.  


Uh, earth to Bill, earth to Bill....  Sports goes there EVERY day.


    
>    Btw, isn't the New Haven minor league baseball team also the Ravens. 
>    Did Poe sleep there one night?

No.  I believe it rhymed with New Haven and that's why they picked it.
No other logical reason comes to mind.

I'm not a big fan of "Rock Cats" either -- anyone who knows anything about
music knows that the term "Cat" is about three generations old and isn't used
all that much today except by older jazz musicians...

Hardward City makes sense though...


'Saw
    
    

61.2194weak name, WEAKER Uni...POWDML::GARBARINOThu Jun 20 1996 14:3711
>  Have you ever seen a real Raven? In fact they are one bad ass bird.

>  If you are ever in London go check out the Tower and you'll see what I mean.
>Those things are huge and the guards that run the tours are very careful to
>tell you to keep your hands away from the birds unless you want to see one
>of your fingers get flown off to the nearest tree.


That's a well and good, but sports marketing isn't based on "read attached
nickname justification"...especially when you're trying to appeal to
the youth market with a $20 hat.  Did you see their uniform ?
61.2195CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 20 1996 14:5712
  All you have to do is read the poem and that should give you the flavor
for what Ravens are all about.

  In any event, last week I was talking to one of Patty's clients, a guy
who lives about 15 miles south of Baltimore. He was saying that people down
there are really getting excited about the Ravens.

  He said that even though the CFL team won a couple championships they never
really caught on and most likely will leave if they don't see the level of
fan support that they would like.

  George
61.2196PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jun 20 1996 17:021
61.2197NQOS01::nqsrv340.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYThu Jun 20 1996 17:506
>  Even Ram is wrong because if a football player did what a ram does they'd
>throw a flag for spearing.

Rams don't leave their feet when they butt, so I think it's legal, George.

brews
61.2198CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 20 1996 17:548
    <<< Note 61.2197 by NQOS01::nqsrv340.nqo.dec.com::may_br "BRUCE MAY" >>>

>Rams don't leave their feet when they butt, so I think it's legal, George.

  Don't they have their front feet sort of curled up under their chest and
their head down when they smash into their target?

  George
61.2199legalHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 20 1996 18:042
Yeah, but that's a legal move if'n the other ram is not already engaged
with another ram.
61.2200This is the Cleveland Browns note!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Jun 20 1996 18:057
    
    	PLEASE TAKE THE RAVENS TO THEIR OWN NOTE PLEASE....THEY ARE NOT AND
    	WILL NEVER BE A CLEVELAND TEAM AGAIN!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    	GRRRRRRRR!
61.2201now what?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 20 1996 18:074
>                    -< This is the Cleveland Browns note! >-

... and there's no Cleveland Brown team, either.

61.2202It's legal even if the Ram is married, right George?MKOTS3::BREENThu Jun 20 1996 18:071
    
61.2203CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jun 20 1996 18:0710
>           -< It's legal even if the Ram is married, right George? >-


Is this that beastiality thing again?


Gee, just when I thought I had it ALL figured out!!!

    

61.2204WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Jun 20 1996 18:083
    
    
    Mod Write Lock it!!!! No Team no Note!!!! :+)
61.2205NQOS01::nqsrv340.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYThu Jun 20 1996 18:276
C'mon Chappy, you dick, if it pisses Hal off, we need to keep it open.

And George, The ram's back feet stay on the ground.

brews
61.2206feet don't fail me nowHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 20 1996 18:306
There is no requirement that you stay on your feet when you hit somebody
in football, assuming that it would be otherwise legal. Obviously if'n
it's a clip or a_illegal block in the back or the like, it don't matter
what you do with your feet.

But you can fly through the air with the greatest of ease and ram 'im.
61.22072 on 2 offOLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsThu Jun 20 1996 18:301
    
61.2208CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 20 1996 18:336
  No rules for 4 footed football players. No rules for hooves or horns either.

  Now what?

  George
61.2209OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsThu Jun 20 1996 18:354
    
    Spearing is illegal and will get you a fat fine if performed in view
    of the ref or the camera. You do not have to leave your feet to
    Spear someone, but it sure helps. 
61.2210yepHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 20 1996 18:383
Yeah, spearing, like clipping, is illegal.

TTom
61.2211CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 20 1996 18:443
  So is what a Ram does spearing or not spearing?

  George
61.2212minor transgressionHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 20 1996 18:485
Depends on if'n the other ram is on the ground and or the firsted ram has
a helmet on and uses it to initiate the contact.

Usually when a couple of rams both ram each other's haid with they own
haid, the refs let it go...
61.2213CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jun 20 1996 18:559
>                                -< 2 on 2 off >-


Is that anything like wax on, wax off?


(say it three times fast...heh heh heh)
    

61.2214CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 20 1996 19:0813
Re        <<< Note 61.2212 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>

>Depends on if'n the other ram is on the ground and or the firsted ram has
>a helmet on and uses it to initiate the contact.

  Well I guess the ram's horns act has a built in helmet. Maybe if he dove
into another ram from the side or behind he'd draw a flag but as you say
head to head they'd let it go.

  Then again if the refs did throw a flag the Ram would probably eat it so
that would have to be figured in somehow.

  George
61.2215a ram of a diff'rent colorHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 20 1996 19:157
and speaking of rams...

Someone kidnapped Ramses the something, the mascot of No Carolina Tar
Heels and kilt 'im, carved 'im up and tried to eat the rascal.

They found the remnant where evidently the perpetrators had too much beer
to drink and couldn't eat all of 'em...
61.2216PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jun 20 1996 19:421
61.2217WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Jun 20 1996 19:484
    
    
       Tom Haas was NOTY!!!
       
61.2218ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 20 1996 19:503
    
    Nice try Chappy, I know I had at least twice as many votes as he did.
    
61.2219HTH'sWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Jun 20 1996 19:527
    
    
    I just count legal votes. Yours was counted but all your butties were
    deleted.
    
    
    Chap
61.2220ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 20 1996 20:394
    
    Sorry Chappy, just because you didn't like the outcome you changed the
    rules.  Karen won by stuffing the ballot box, and nowhere in the rules
    did it state it was not legal.
61.2221CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westThu Jun 20 1996 21:2314
    
    re: nowhere in the rules
    
    However, if this were to be taken to a court of law, the result could
    go either way.  For example, take our SPDs (Software Product
    Description).  If you do something with a given product that the SPD
    does not say you can't do, it is unsupported.  This is because the SPD
    is a legally binding document stating ONLY what IS supported.
    
    Therefore, someone might conclude that since the rules did not say you
    could "stuff" the ballot box, then it is not allowed.
    
    Marc
    
61.2222ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 20 1996 23:444
    
    Who said I stuffed the ballot box?  I asked people to vote for me -
    its called campaigning and its legal in every election in the USA that
    I know of.
61.2224PECAD8::CHILDSFri Jun 21 1996 11:326
Simple suggestion that I'm sure both Hal and Groner can appreciate, change
the name of this note to Cleveland Browns/Baltimore Ravens. After all they
are the same team. They're still Art Modells and 64 coaches for 45 players...

mike
61.2225ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 11:582
    
    I don't think NOTY will ever recover from ChappyGate 96.
61.2226CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 21 1996 12:3111
RE                     <<< Note 61.2224 by PECAD8::CHILDS >>>

>Simple suggestion that I'm sure both Hal and Groner can appreciate, change
>the name of this note to Cleveland Browns/Baltimore Ravens. After all they
>are the same team. They're still Art Modells and 64 coaches for 45 players...

  Sounds good to me but watch out. There's been not only disagreement but
actual hard feelings (unbelievable as that may sound) over the Braves note
including the names Boston and Milwaukee. 

  George
61.2227ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 12:354
    
    This is the Cleveland Browns note, this note has nothing to do with the
    Baltimore Ravens.  Anyone who wants to believe it does just doesn't
    have a clue.
61.2228CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 21 1996 12:464
  
  See, don't say I didn't told you so.

  George
61.2229ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 21 1996 12:592
    
    And there is already a note for the Baltimore Modells anyway...
61.2230once a team always a teamHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 21 1996 13:187
Hey George,

Did ya notice that when Smoltz won his 14th in a row he beat a team
record held by a guy who played for Boston? Aught-two or something like
that.

TTom
61.2231POWDML::GARBARINOFri Jun 21 1996 14:484
>    This is the Cleveland Browns note, this note has nothing to do with the
>    Baltimore Ravens.

or the Cleveland-Los Angeles-St. Louis Rams either....right Groaner ???
61.2232Just trying to abide by the law....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jun 21 1996 15:338
    
    
    
       Karen I would have Tabulated and posted them but Frank said not too.
    No more contests remember???
    
    
    Chap
61.2233wholesome, with family valuesHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 21 1996 15:408
Hail, we can run it over on HBAHBA somewhere.

But we gotta have some rules. Like,  all votes have to be posted, you can
bribe anyone, you can do anything, nothing matters.

Important things like that. 

TTom
61.2234Bernie is back.....SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Jun 27 1996 20:079
    
    	Latest word from home is that Bernie Kosar is very VERY interested
    	in owning the new "CLEVELAND BROWNS".  He expects that it will cost
    	him 3 Mill..  
    
    	I say.....GO FOR IT!!!
    
    	WOOF!
    
61.2235helluva dealHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 27 1996 20:106
Yo WOOF

I know that Cleveland is down on its luck and all but 3 Mill for a whole
football team?

Hail, the Richardsons had to pay 150 Mill or so for the Painters
61.2236get what you pay forPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jun 27 1996 20:371
61.2237SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Jun 28 1996 12:224
    
    	Well, maybe I read it wrong...I look at it again this weekend.
    
    	WOOF!
61.2238PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Fri Sep 13 1996 15:184
61.2239Muck FodellALFSS2::TAYLOR_Drun those fat tackles to deathMon Sep 30 1996 19:5814
61.2240So where was the surprise?MKOTS3::BREENMon Sep 30 1996 20:0225
61.2241He said he would sell the team....SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Sep 30 1996 20:219
61.2242Browns went down the crapperBSS::RIGGENMon Sep 30 1996 20:295
61.2243NQOS01::nqsrv211.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchMon Sep 30 1996 23:115
61.2244no surprise, dope as usualROCK::GRONOWSKITue Oct 01 1996 02:395
61.2245Whatever opposing wagon we can find!STRATA::BTOWERTue Oct 01 1996 11:192
61.2246Yankmees will choke againROCK::GRONOWSKITue Oct 01 1996 11:563
61.2247Its Actually Seeming Funny (sometimes)YIELD::BARBIERITue Oct 01 1996 12:338
61.2248What took you so longMKOTS3::BREENTue Oct 01 1996 14:1315
61.2249CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Oct 01 1996 14:356
61.2250ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Oct 01 1996 16:1310
61.2251MKOTS3::BREENTue Oct 01 1996 18:2015
61.22521 9 9 9 C L E V E L A N D B R O W N SSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Feb 18 1997 14:0214
    
    	News from the Cleveland front......
    
    	The City of Cleveland has guarenteed them a team in 1999!!!
    
    	The City had to sell a certain percentage of preseason seats
    	by the end of January.  They did it by mid January.  The NFL
    	will now have to give Cleveland up to 48 mills to help build
    	the stadium which has been demolished.  There are still some
    	lodge and club seats available...not many...but a few are left.
    	
    
    
    	WOOF!
61.2253CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Feb 18 1997 14:063
  So where is the NFL going to come up with this team? Expansion?

  George
61.2254ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Feb 18 1997 14:082
    
    I hope so, but suspect not...
61.2255THE BROWNS STILL LIVE...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Feb 18 1997 14:1323
    
    	News from Cleveland is that they will get an expansion team but
    	be prepared....they more than likely won't get the same deal the
    	two previous expansion teams got when they came into the league.
    
    	In the Browns News there is this poster for sale...
    
    
    
    			On the top it says...
    
    
    
    			YOUR MINE
    
    			There is this Cleveland Brown guy 
    			choking this bird around the neck
    			in the middle...  and on the bottom
    	
    			IN 99.
    
    
    WOOF!
61.2256After you on this one, GroanerMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Feb 18 1997 14:155
    Groaner do you want to tell them where it might be coming from?
    
    I got Cleveland folk mad at me for pointing out the Browns basenote but
    what was said there by Modell is very similar to things said by Bob
    Kraft about a stadium in Boston.
61.2257ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backTue Feb 18 1997 14:284
    
    Most likely move would be Seattle, followed by Cincinnati, followed by
    a team that refuses to update their high school football stadium <---
    aluminum benches (GET REAL!)
61.2258PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Feb 18 1997 14:474
    The Cleveland Cardinals has a nice ring to it.
    
    I still don't see Cleveland getting a team before L.A.  The L.A.
    Cardinals sounds pretty good too.
61.2259MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Tue Feb 18 1997 15:3310
I read a report that Cincy was in the final stages of selecting
a site for a new stadium, so it looks like they're out of the 
running.

Seahawks, Cards, and Pats would be my order for an existing team.
I think the NFL is trying to avoid having an existing team move
into LA on its own, so expanding by two teams (LA/CLE) would make
some sense, though not from a product quality standpoint.

Mike
61.2260SALEM::DODASomeday, someway....Tue Feb 18 1997 15:496
  <<< Note 61.2259 by MYLIFE::mccarthy "Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468" >>>

>so expanding by two teams (LA/CLE) would make
>some sense, though not from a product quality standpoint.

That's ok. They're used to it.
61.2261MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Tue Feb 18 1997 16:036
>>so expanding by two teams (LA/CLE) would make
>>some sense, though not from a product quality standpoint.

>That's ok. They're used to it.

I get an assist, right?
61.2262SALEM::DODASomeday, someway....Tue Feb 18 1997 17:351
Yes you do.
61.2263CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Feb 18 1997 17:435
  So what's this deal about how the Browns would get a team in '99 if they sold
a certain a certain number of tickets? Exactly who is guaranteeing what to
whom?

  George
61.2264ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Feb 18 1997 18:194
    
    The NFL guarenteed the city of Cleveland a team.
    
    Joe
61.2265CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Feb 18 1997 18:349
  Since they can't force a team to stay or move that would mean they must
definitely be planing an expansion, right?

  I had heard rumors but I never heard an announcement that the NFL was ready
to expand again. Has that been decided or does Cleveland only get a team IF
they expand.

  George
61.2266don't matterHBAHBA::HAASnetwrok spatialistTue Feb 18 1997 18:377
With all the comings and goings in pro sports, you don't really need
a_expansion to find a team willing to move, even to Cleveland.

Beside, the NFL has nothing to lose. What can Cleveland do? Sue 'em?
Stand in line and good luck.

TTom
61.2267ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backTue Feb 18 1997 18:542
    
    move the Rams to Cleveland and call them... the Cleveland Rams
61.2268They Really Are!YIELD::BARBIERITue Feb 18 1997 19:471
      Groaner, I LOVE your set personal!
61.2269NQOS01::nqsrv141.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchInside IntelThu Feb 20 1997 19:135
Damn, with the ultimate demise of the Indians, I'd figured the days of 
Halbonics were over.

brews