[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference lgp30::christian-perspective

Title:Discussions from a Christian Perspective
Notice:Prostitutes and tax collectors welcome!
Moderator:CSC32::J_CHRISTIE
Created:Mon Sep 17 1990
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1362
Total number of notes:61362

634.0. "Vigilante justice in California" by JURAN::VALENZA (I'm notes about you.) Tue Apr 06 1993 15:19

Article: 5881
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.news.trouble,clari.news.law.crime.violent,clari.news.law.crime.trial,clari.local.california
Subject: Mother who shot accused molester arraigned
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 93 18:02:10 PDT
 
	SONORA, Calif. (UPI) -- A mother who shot and killed her son's alleged
molester in a Northern California courtroom was arraigned under heavy
security Monday on a charge of murder as townspeople rallied outside in
support of the vigilante, chanting ``set her free.''
	Relatives told reporters Ellena Nesler took justice into her own
hands and shot the accused child molester, Daniel Driver, because she
feared he would escape punishment in the court system.
	Nesler, 40, did not enter a plea in Tuolumne County Central Justice
Court to a charge of murder and use of a firearm. The hearing was
continued at her request to give Nesler time to find a lawyer.
	Nesler, appearing calm and confident, frequently turned her head back
to look at family and friends who crowded the courtroom in the Sierra
foothills, at one point mouthing ``I love you.''
	Authorities beefed up security in the courthouse to prevent
retaliation against Nesler by members of Driver's family.
	Driver, 35, was shot five times with a .25-caliber pistol last Friday
during a recess in his preliminary hearing in the Gold Rush town of
Jamestown. He was accused of molesting Nesler's son and three other
boys, ages 6 to 8, at a church camp between 1986 and 1989.
	Nesler's family told reporters the mother snapped when Driver smirked
at her and her son when they arrived to testify.
	Her sister, Jan Martinez, said Nesler told her after the shooting: 
``I know I'm not God. I know I'm not the jury. But at that instant, I
didn't feel justice was going to get done.''
	Investigators said Nesler walked up behind Driver and shot him in the
back of the head. The mother dropped her gun and surrendered when
deputies drew their guns.
	Nesler spent the weekend in jail but was freed late Monday on $500,
000 bail.
	Driver had been charged with seven counts of child molestation
against four young boys while working as a handyman at a church camp in
Pinecrest.
	Marretta Adams, another sister of Nesler, said Driver had threatened
to kill the boy and his mother if he ever told anyone about the alleged
molestations. She said the boy lived in terror for the last five years.
	``He couldn't go into his backyard in the dark thinking he might get
kidnapped by Dan and driven away and killed so he wouldn't open his
mouth,'' she said.
	Neighbors in the historic town about 70 miles southeast of Sacramento
expressed support for the mother, saying the suspected child molester
deserved to die. Some said they want to serve on her jury so they could
acquit the mother.
	``I think she's great. All the times that I was going through the
court hearings, if I had a gun, I probably would have done the same
thing. She did what I thought of doing,'' said Janet Bingham, mother of
another alleged victim.
	Supporters rallied outside the courthouse, chanting, ``Set her free!
Let her go!,'' as motorists driving by the demonstration honked their
horns in support, and a legal defense fund was established.
	Authorities, however, said there was no justification for the
frontier-style vigilante justice meted out to Driver.
	``This lady has been charged with murder. She has done something
which is reprehensible. It is wrong,'' District Attorney Michael Knowles
said Monday. ``There is a procedure. There is a process. People can say
the system does not work, but that is not true.''
	The state Attorney General's Office will prosecute the case because
local court officials observed the shooting and are considered
witnesses.
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
634.1JURAN::VALENZAI'm notes about you.Tue Apr 06 1993 15:3032
>	``I think she's great. All the times that I was going through the
>court hearings, if I had a gun, I probably would have done the same
>thing. She did what I thought of doing,'' said Janet Bingham, mother of
>another alleged victim.
>	Supporters rallied outside the courthouse, chanting, ``Set her free!
>Let her go!,'' as motorists driving by the demonstration honked their
>horns in support, and a legal defense fund was established.

    It is really scary to see Americans supporting a cold blooded vigilante
    murder of someone who was being charged with a crime.

    I am reminded of an episode of one of those tabloid television shows
    ("Hard Copy", "Inside Edition"--I don't know which, I was just channel
    surfing at the time.)  I forget the details now, but it involved a
    teenaged passenger dying in a car accident in which the driver, a
    fellow teen, had been drinking.  As I recall, the mother of the
    deceased teenager had reconciled herself with the girl who had done the
    driving, and had reached out to her in forgiveness, and as a result she
    was reviled by some of the other teenagers of the community.  "How can
    you do that when she killed your child?" they screamed at her.

    Hatred, and the mentality of revenge, even to the point of violence as
    occured in California, seems to be taking hold in ever greater numbers
    in our society, even celebrated as a virtue.  It certainly stands in
    such stark contrast to the values that Jesus espoused.  I fear that
    things are getting worse.  Now that our society has commemorated the
    twenty fifth anniversary of the Martin Luther King assassination, the
    contrast between the values of loving your enemy, nonviolence, and
    reconciliation that Jesus taught and that King put into practice, seem
    so much at odds with the direction that our nation is taking.

    -- Mike
634.2CVG::THOMPSONRadical CentralistTue Apr 06 1993 15:575
    So I wonder if this will set back the anti child abuse efforts? Sure
    does reflect badly on the people who are fighting child abuse doesn't
    it.
    
    			Alfred
634.3TLE::COLLIS::JACKSONRoll away with a half sashayTue Apr 06 1993 17:095
Re:  .2

A consciousness-raising thought. Thank you, Alfred

Collis
634.4TLE::COLLIS::JACKSONRoll away with a half sashayTue Apr 06 1993 17:117
Re:  .0

I definately have sympathy for the mother.  However, it is
quite wrong for an individual to usurp the authority of
government and make herself judge, jury and executioner.

Collis
634.5I fear for myself?MORO::BEELER_JEWe'll always have ParisTue Apr 06 1993 17:1710
    I wish I knew the answer to this.  There's a side of me which says that
    violence, in any shape, manner, form .. has never solved any problems. 
    I would hope that as a human race we could some day rise above violence
    as a perceived solution to any problem.

    Then, where children are concerned I readily and freely admit to the
    simple fact that were I faced with an individual who had done harm to a
    child .. I fear for what I would do.

    Bubba
634.6MSBCS::JMARTINTue Apr 06 1993 17:2712
    Re: .5
    
    I hear ya Bubba.  There would certainly be a battle within; trying to 
    restrain myself from what I feel would be righteous indignation.
    
    As heartless as our legal system appears (and I believe some lawyers
    with wrong motives contribute to this), the procedures of legal
    jurisprudence must be uniform in all cases.  We must not lose the
    notion of innocent until proven guilty.  Vigilantes can potentially
    cause the wrong person to be executed before her trial.
    
    -Jack  
634.7JUPITR::HILDEBRANTI'm the NRATue Apr 06 1993 17:428
    I sure can understand the mother's actions. I really don't know
    how I would have reacted.
    
    I know that its wrong....but...so many times the innocent suffer,
    while criminals have a reduced/light sentence for the most hineous
    of crimes.
    
    Marc H.
634.8MSBCS::JMARTINTue Apr 06 1993 19:587
    Hi Marc:
    
    This is why capital punishment is not a deterant.  I guarentee that if
    people were sentenced and executed within months of the conviction,
    people would think twice before committing capital crimes!
    
    -Jack
634.9non sequiturCSC32::J_CHRISTIERise Again!Tue Apr 06 1993 20:065
    .8
    
    Do you mean *is* a deterrent?
    
    Richard 
634.10JURAN::VALENZAI'm notes about you.Tue Apr 06 1993 20:068
    I think he was suggesting that it is not a deterrent now, but could be
    if the system of justice were swifter and more certain.
    
    In any case, capital punishment has generally not been shown to be a
    deterrent.  Of course, the fact that it is barbaric and immoral is
    another factor that we might want to consider.  :-)
    
    -- Mike
634.11MSBCS::JMARTINTue Apr 06 1993 20:2715
    Mike:
    
    Just out of curiosity, what is your feelings of capital punishment
    under the Mosaic law?  This may lead to the old argument of, God's
    standards in the bible are God's unless capital punishment is involved.
    It is then added to the bible but not inspired by God since a loving
    God wouldn't command it.  
    
    I was reading in Numbers I believe where a man was stoned to death for
    chopping firewood on the Sabbath.  Evidentally, he was doing this in
    defiance toward God, i.e. shaking his fist at God!
    
    By my standard this is harsh but what about under God's standard?
    
    -Jack
634.12CSC32::J_CHRISTIERise Again!Tue Apr 06 1993 20:428
    .11
    
    This is yet another problem with taking the Bible at face value.
    Billy Graham, in an interview with David Frost I saw on PBS last
    Sunday, said that he saw a growing problem with people "worshiping
    the Bible."
    
    Richard
634.13TLE::COLLIS::JACKSONRoll away with a half sashayTue Apr 06 1993 21:0918
Re:  .11

   >This is yet another problem with taking the Bible at face value.
   >Billy Graham, in an interview with David Frost I saw on PBS last
   >Sunday, said that he saw a growing problem with people "worshiping
   >the Bible."
    
I hardly think that Billy Graham equated taking the Bible at face
value (it means what it says) with "worshipping the Bible"
especially since Billy Graham takes the Bible at "face value".

Which does not mean that "worshipping the Bible" is not a problem.
Anything that takes our eyes off Jesus can be a problem.  Fortunately,
those who read and believe the Bible tend to focus their eyes on
Jesus, not off of Him.

Collis
  
634.14SDSVAX::SWEENEYPatrick Sweeney in New YorkTue Apr 06 1993 21:144
    Do you and Billy Graham agree on what the Bible is?
    
    What do you (or Billy Graham) mean by "face value" or by "worshipping
    the Bible"?
634.16CSC32::J_CHRISTIERise Again!Tue Apr 06 1993 21:466
    .14
    
    See 613.84 for my answer.  See Billy for his.
    
    Peace,
    Richard
634.17Justice? Is that what you call it?CSC32::KINSELLAEternity...smoking or non-smoking?Mon Apr 12 1993 23:158
    
    Perhaps if justice was truly just, there wouldn't be these 
    activities in our country.  I think that our judicial system
    is a failure.  Crimes go free and the innocent suffer.  Not 
    that there are some parts worth keeping, but I'd say it needs 
    revamping.  
    
    Jill