| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 845.1 | misplaced priority is a common problem | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (DTN 223-8576, MSO2-2/A2, IM&T) | Mon Feb 07 1994 17:16 | 9 |
| re Note 845.0 by CSC32::J_CHRISTIE:
And then there is the following, in Luke:
"6:41 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy
brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine
own eye?"
Bob
|
| 845.2 | | PACKED::COLLIS::JACKSON | DCU fees? NO!!! | Mon Feb 07 1994 19:28 | 11 |
| >Ironically, the people most often accused of consuming camels here are the
>ones who are least into the letter of the Law, but who instead wrestle with
>the weightier matters of the Law.
Indeed, it is ironic.
However, since I believe that that those wrestling with some of the
weightier matters have missed some of the critical essentials, I
think it applies either way.
Collis
|
| 845.3 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | | Tue Feb 08 1994 12:42 | 9 |
| Richard:
It has been openly proclaimed by fundamentalists in this conference
that as the Bible states, the just shall live by faith. Faith alone
saves based upon God's mercy and love for us.
My question to you is, who here is consuming camels and who isn't?
-Jack
|
| 845.4 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Honorary Lesbian | Tue Feb 08 1994 14:58 | 5 |
| You, I suspect, believe I am one who swallows the spitting
beast of the desert. Am I correct?
Richard
|
| 845.5 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | | Tue Feb 08 1994 18:35 | 22 |
| 845.6 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Honorary Lesbian | Tue Feb 08 1994 19:18 | 11 |
| .5
If I made an implication, it was about who was being accused of swallowing
camels, not about who was swallowing camels.
Thank you for quoting me exactly. It does say what I said it says and
nothing else.
Shalom,
Richard
|
| 845.7 | | AIMHI::JMARTIN | | Wed Feb 09 1994 13:09 | 3 |
| Thanks and sorry, I think I have it straight now!
-Jack
|