[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hbahba::cam_sports

Title:Sports 93-96 Archive. No new notes allowed
Notice:Chainsaw's last standSPORTS_97
Moderator:HBAHBA::HAAS
Created:Mon Jan 11 1993
Last Modified:Tue Apr 15 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:302
Total number of notes:117855

63.0. "CLEVELAND INDIANS" by LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR (CaVs will win it all!) Thu Jan 14 1993 12:22

    
    	The Cleveland Indians are now on the way up.  No longer the
    cellar dwellers.  Look for a much improved team this year with
    them fighting for 1st the entire season.  Predicted to win in
    all in two years when they move into their new stadium.
    
    
    	WaHooooo!
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
63.1New stadium guarantees champeenship? Is this baseball fixed?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 14 1993 13:248
    
    > Predicted to win in
    > all in two years when they move into their new stadium.
      
    By whom (besides you, Hal?)?  Long way to go before that...
    
    glenn
                                            
63.2CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 14 1993 13:277
Good report on Charles Nagy on the news last night.  He was back home
to see the recent UCONN game.

Sportscaster figures he might win 20 this year.....


'Saw
63.3MKFSA::LONG"just keep it between the lines"Thu Jan 14 1993 15:108
	re: winning it all in two years...

	Hal,

	Just for future reference, and I think you'll need it, the Crow Cafe
	is now note 50.

	Bill
63.4WOOF!AXIS::ROBICHAUD1-900-822-NOTYThu Jan 14 1993 15:201
    
63.5Turned it around!LUDWIG::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Thu Jan 14 1993 16:517
    
    	The Indians were 2nd only to the World champs in wins durring the 
    second half of last season.  Things are looking up for the tribe!
    
    
    
    	Chief - WaHooooo!
63.6(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBSqueelers = Loser Girly Mons Thu Jan 14 1993 19:0111
    HAL,
    
    glad to see you're blind optimism extends past the Brown(spot)s(tm) and
    to the other losers in Clevescum.
    
    The Indiand win it all in two years, yeah right, and I'm Mork and
    you're Mindy.
    
    
    JaKe
    
63.7two years is all it takesSTRATA::WHITEHAIRCaVs will win it all!Fri Jan 15 1993 13:066
    
    You wish Jake!
    
    
    	WaHoooo!
    
63.8let's see where they are in '95ANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Fri Jan 15 1993 20:1313
    I think a lot of people would like to see the Indians do well.  It'd be
    fun to see what Cleveland Stadium would be like with 60,000 to 70,000
    crazy people for baseball.  After all it's been years, nay decades
    since they've fielded a contending team.  While they have several fine
    young players who may form the nucleus of a decent team, it remains to
    be seen if 1) they stay together long enough to have that chance 2)
    these players do eventually develop.
    
    Right now their biggest question mark has to be the pitching staff. 
    They aren't going anywhere in the next two years with this group.
    
    
    Spud
63.9CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsFri Jan 15 1993 20:2719
>    I think a lot of people would like to see the Indians do well.  It'd be
>    fun to see what Cleveland Stadium would be like with 60,000 to 70,000
>    crazy people for baseball.  

See the movie "Major League"   8^)


>    Right now their biggest question mark has to be the pitching staff. 
>    They aren't going anywhere in the next two years with this group.

Well, Nagy is good.  
    
    
And he's from UCONN too!


8^)

'Saw
63.10SALEM::DODABill's Pork Parade Rolls onTue Mar 23 1993 11:347
Steve Olin, Tim Crews and Bob Ojeda were involved in a boating 
accident yesterday. Olin died instantly. Crews reportedly died 
this morning. Ojeda is listed in critical condition. The boat 
they were in slammed into a dock which extended out into the 
lake.

daryll
63.11Bad news for Tribe fans!ROULET::WHITEHAIRMark Price = 3 pt ace!Tue Mar 23 1993 12:010
63.12TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie has a tooth!!!Tue Mar 23 1993 12:060
63.13SALEM::DODABill's Pork Parade Rolls onTue Mar 23 1993 13:4210
Just got off the phone with a friend in FLA...

He's staying with his uncle in Port Charlotte. He manages the 
condo complex that the Rangers stay at. He's close friends with 
John Barfield. Barfield is with the Indians this year. 

Barfield says that they hit the dock at full speed, CHEST high. 
There were no lights on the dock, so they never saw it coming. 

daryll
63.14Big surprise.SALEM::DODABill's Pork Parade Rolls onTue Mar 23 1993 13:423
Oh, and all the Rangers think Canseco is a stuck up jerk....

dd
63.15CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Mar 23 1993 16:331
    huh?
63.16METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Mar 23 1993 16:433
.14 was a continuation of .13

The Crazy Met
63.17CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Mar 23 1993 17:007
    Olin had twin boys last August, and a three year old girl...
    
    Really sad.  
    
    Nobody said it has to be "fair"...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
63.18will we some trading ?ROULET::WHITEHAIRMark Price = 3 pt ace!Tue Mar 23 1993 17:3510
    
    	This is a devistating blow to the Tribe.  A questionable staff
    at best is now placed in a dark hole and no one knows what kind of
    mental effect this will have on the rest of the club.  Hopefully 
    they will use this to bring this team closer together.  The Tribe
    was ready to turn the corner, and now, it seems that another road
    block has been placed in their way.  I hope they can pull together!
    
    
    .........
63.19TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie has a tooth!!!Tue Mar 23 1993 18:123
re: .18

Who cares about baseball at a time like this?
63.20LJOHUB::CRITZTue Mar 23 1993 18:184
    	Any mention of alcohol? I didn't hear anything last night
    	about alcohol on ESPN.
    
    	Scott
63.21CAMONE::WAYShore,Brimsek,Orr,BourqueTue Mar 23 1993 18:2015
>
>    	Any mention of alcohol? I didn't hear anything last night
>    	about alcohol on ESPN.
    
I haven't heard any, but hey, even if they had had a few beers, I'd
think that something as long as that pier should have been lighted.
From what I heard it wasn't.

But again, I'm sure I don't have all the details.....

What a tragedy.....



'Saw
63.22LJOHUB::CRITZTue Mar 23 1993 18:315
    	Definitely shoulda been lights. I was just wondering
    	if alcohol or drugs had added to the problem of seeing
    	the pier.
    
    	Scott
63.23how tragicFRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyTue Mar 23 1993 18:351
    They never should've left Tucson.
63.24ROYALT::ASHEArsenio spotted with golf pants...Tue Mar 23 1993 19:412
    Sounds like alcohol was involved.  The pier should have been lit,
    obviously.  Sounds like it was around dusk.  
63.25Lots of supportSTRATA::WHITEHAIRMark Price = 3 pt ace!Wed Mar 24 1993 11:2126
    
    	Heard a few different things last night.....true, they did find 6
    full beer cans, 1 empty beer can and 1 nearly full bottle of Vodca.
    This does not substantiate saying that alcohol was involved nor does
    it convict these players of being drunk.  Also last night, it was said
    that this pier was just extended resently.  The pier was only 198 ft
    long instead of the reported 250 ft long.  
    	Other reports are that Tim Crews drove the boat at full power into
    the dock...why, they say that the throtle was wide open....now, here I
    say that the inpact could have caused the throtle to go forward...No
    conclusive evidence here.  Now, this is the biggie, the word is that
    the boat took out two pylons and landed 100 ft further down the lake.
    Well, if the throttle got stuck in the forward direction...it would 
    seem likely that the boat would continue on it way...  Nothing
    conclusive here either.
    	Also saw on TV last night the Indians VP and Coach Hargrove.  Both
    were visibly shaken and said that the Tribe would take care of both
    players families as they should.  Sort of proud to be a Indians fan!
    Good guys!
    
    	Bottom line is that the Indians will take care of the surviors and
    be OK themselves.
    
    
    
    		:-(
63.26CAMONE::WAYShore,Brimsek,Orr,BourqueWed Mar 24 1993 11:3735
>    	Heard a few different things last night.....true, they did find 6
>    full beer cans, 1 empty beer can and 1 nearly full bottle of Vodca.
>    This does not substantiate saying that alcohol was involved nor does
>    it convict these players of being drunk.  Also last night, it was said
>    that this pier was just extended resently.  The pier was only 198 ft
>    long instead of the reported 250 ft long.  

Heard this morning that one of them had a blood alcohol level of .17, but
they didn't say who.


>    	Other reports are that Tim Crews drove the boat at full power into
>    the dock...why, they say that the throtle was wide open....now, here I
>    say that the inpact could have caused the throtle to go forward...No
>    conclusive evidence here.  Now, this is the biggie, the word is that
>    the boat took out two pylons and landed 100 ft further down the lake.
>    Well, if the throttle got stuck in the forward direction...it would 
>    seem likely that the boat would continue on it way...  Nothing
>    conclusive here either.

From being on a rescue squad for a couple of years, one thing I learned
was that what you normally expect any type of vehicle to do in any
kind of accident is highly unpredictable.  That's why the folks who
unravel what happened get paid big bucks...


>    	Bottom line is that the Indians will take care of the surviors and
>    be OK themselves.
    
    
Still a tragedy of epic proportions.......


'Saw    

63.27There must be a reason....for all the misfortuneJUNCO::WHITEHAIRMark Price = 3 pt ace!Sat Mar 27 1993 13:4443
    
    	To update this file on the boat accident.....the accident has
    shocked baseball and brought up many bad memories for the Indians
    from years past.  This club has certainly gone through alot.  
    	Reports are that a club that was close already has gotten 
    lots closer.  This is a team with the right motivation can be a
    contender.
    	The team will do right by the families of the two dead.  This
    is a determined bunch.
    	Ojeda was released from the hospital Thursday and the Cleveland
    Plain Dealer reported that no alcohol was found in his blood.  Ojeda
    was sitting in the back of the boat as it hit the dock which explains
    why he only received head injuries (sort of a scalp job).  He stated
    that before hitting the dock, he did not see it and also said that
    he could not remember anything afterward.  Blood tests from Olin and 
    Crews have yet to be released.
    	Its been reported that the three were heading across the lake to
    pick up a friend.
    	The Indians have played 2 games since the accident and came away
    with a 2-2 tie in 11 innings and a 6-5 win yesterday.  The clubhouse
    is still very quiet but things are getting back to normal thanks to 
    practices.
    	No word on if the team will try and pickup more piching help.
    	It will be interesting to see what the team and league will do to
    recignize this fatal accident.  The Tribe has already said that they
    will wear arm bands and place a plaqe in the bullpens.  To designate
    the season to the pitchers is probibly another thing that will be done.
    I can also see the league do something in memory of the two fallen
    pitchers on opening day across the league.
    	Most people I talk to want to see the Tribe come out of this and
    rip the league apart.  What a movie this will make someday.  The
    whole senario reminds me of "Major League" already.  What a great
    mixture of players on this team.  All the ups and downs from Joey Belle
    to Wicklander to Olin, Crews and Ojeda.  Can't wait to see Ojeda back
    on the field!
    
    
    
    	Go Tribe!
    		We're all with you!
    
    		May your pitches sizzel and your bats thunder!
    
63.28(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBCuster/Evinrude WhoKiltMoreIndians?Sun Mar 28 1993 00:255
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
63.29FDCV06::KINGOH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Sun Mar 28 1993 00:423
    Very poor taste Jake... A new low for you...
    
    REK
63.30PFSVAX::JACOBCuster/Evinrude WhoKiltMoreIndians?Mon Mar 29 1993 15:536
    Thanks.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
63.31GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementMon Mar 29 1993 16:239
    
    .28 and .30 don't surprise me.
    
    Jake, you'd be singin' a different tune if people were cracking Mario
    cancer jokes.  Like REK said, a new low for even you.
    
    :^(
    
    Mark.
63.32PFSVAX::JACOBCensored fer poor tasteMon Mar 29 1993 17:2421
    
    >>Jake, you'd be singin' a different tune if people were cracking Mario
    >>cancer jokes.  Like REK said, a new low for even you.
    
    Wrongo, Oh Marky-Mark, wrongo.
    
    I think that anybody that knows me knows that I'm AWFUL thick
    skinned(and younzes all thought I was fat  (8^)*) and cain take a joke
    about as good as any.  If I would have heard Mario jokes, I woulda been
    the one to put them in here, regardless of the situation he's in.
    Maybe it is tasteless, or for that matter, the word maybe doesn't
    apply, it is tasteless, but, it's a dirty job, and somebody's got to do
    it.
    
    The problem with the world today is ALMOST EVERYBODY has some little
    ship on there shoulder, very precariously balanced, just waiting fer
    the lightest tap to knock it off.  What happened to being able to laugh
    at a situation to remove some of the hurt and help lighten the mood????
    
    JaKe
    
63.33it's taking advantage of other people's tragediesFRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyMon Mar 29 1993 17:281
    Nobody was ever called to uphold tasteless "jokes."
63.34HOw's about jokes about the WTC bomb, r they funnyPFSVAX::JACOBThe King of Poor TasteMon Mar 29 1993 17:394
    Hence the name, Evin RUDE!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
63.35A VOTE FOR JAKEWMOIS::FASSETT_ETue Mar 30 1993 14:427
    Hey Jake I share your feelings, I came up with a joke about the
    situation the day after it happened. Some people thought it was funny
    and others were horrified. I will not put it in here, but for all those
    people who thought my joke was tasteless, my reply was the same as
    yours was- Somebody had to do it.
    p.s. anybody that wants to here my joke send me mail offline.
    WMOIS::FASSETT_E
63.36ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Tue Mar 30 1993 15:2412
    What's Evinrude....is that the brand name of the vodka or something????
    
    As far as a new low goes...I tend to dis-agree...it's just more of the
    same stuff we've come to expect from JaKe...ala the Iraq thing, the
    Jeffrey Dahmer thing, etc...etc...and I don't think it's meant to cause
    pain as much as making light of a rough situation....also it kinda
    lends itself to that electronic tavern atmosphere we all love so
    much...just wouldn't be the same without Jakey's jokes! (however poor
    in taste they might be)   :-)
    
    Carlitos
    
63.37GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementTue Mar 30 1993 16:186
    Sorry, Carlos, that doesn't cut it.
    
    It's more like the type of humor you'd expect out of an giggling,
    pimpled-face 8th grader.  
    
    Mark.
63.39FDCV07::KINGOH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Tue Mar 30 1993 19:465
    Hey Bill, instead of telling others to get a sense of humor why don't
    jake and you try and get one. Some comments are not funny or called
    for. This was one of them.
    
    REK
63.40I got one, how 'bout you?MKFSA::LONGI got friends in low placesTue Mar 30 1993 19:544
	Besides, JaKe dun gradjeated da eighth grade.


	billl
63.41C'mon, laugh at ALL of life, DammitPFSVAX::JACOBThe Charley Tuna of SPROTSTue Mar 30 1993 20:0029
    >><<< Note 63.39 by FDCV07::KING "OH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" >>>

    >>Hey Bill, instead of telling others to get a sense of humor why don't
    >>jake and you try and get one. 
    
      Personally, I cain find the humor in just about any situation that's
    thrown my way.  I don't dwell on the morbidity of the situation and
    treat EVERY FREAKIN' THING AS HANDS OFF.  Too many people do.  Too many
    people have forgotten how to laugh.  That's why the world's going to
    hell in a handbasket, and of all the shortages we have, we have no
    shortage of handbasket to go to hell in.
    
    
    >>					Some comments are not funny or called
    >>for. This was one of them.
    
    Purely YOUR opinion.  What's funny to some, ain't funny to others. 
    Plus, we know ALL about "opinions".
    
    
    Leaving all the judgemental BS behind, on wif the subject of the
    Cleveland Indians.
    
    I read this morning where the people investigating the accident called
    a press conference fer sometime today to announce the results of their
    investigation, anybody heard what they said?????
    
    JaKe
    
63.42PFSVAX::JACOBThe Charley Tuna of SPROTSTue Mar 30 1993 20:038
    
    >>	Besides, JaKe dun gradjeated da eighth grade.
    
    Pssssssssssssst, Bill, don't tell anybody that eight grade was the best
    four years of my life, though.
    
    JaKe
    
63.43smileCTHQ::LEARYWACO: WeAin'tComin'OutTue Mar 30 1993 20:077
    -1, JaKe
    Ah, was that when they voted you most likely to recede(hairline dat
    is)?
    
    8^),
    MikeL
    
63.44FDCV07::KINGOH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Tue Mar 30 1993 20:085
    Why would you care about the results Jake, running out of
    things to make jokes out of? Maybe you should sent a joke card to
    Olin's and Crew's families.. 
    
    REK
63.45(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBThe Charley Tuna of SPROTSTue Mar 30 1993 20:096
    MikeL,
                                             
    Nah, that was on the third pass thru 11th grade.
    
    JaKe
    
63.46fwiwFRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyTue Mar 30 1993 20:171
    The news just said one of them (forget which) was intoxicated.
63.47PFSVAX::JACOBThe Charley Tuna of SPROTSTue Mar 30 1993 20:1716
    
    >>Why would you care about the results Jake, running out of
    >>things to make jokes out of?
    
    Do me, REK!!
    
    As stated, I didn't make the damned thing up.  Secondly, I thought it
    was sick when I heard it, but ALSO funny.  I cain see yer bitchin if I
    was trying to intentionally hurt someone thru the joke, but it was just
    a freakin' joke, not a message to any one person with any intent to
    hurt them.  I cain take a joke, and give it out.  Live a little, why
    not laugh at something sometime off the straight and narrow.  
    
    JaKe
    
    
63.48FDCV07::KINGOH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Tue Mar 30 1993 20:214
    It was Crews..... He was over the legal limit for Florida....
    
    
    REK
63.49FDCV07::KINGOH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Tue Mar 30 1993 20:254
    Jake, KMA You thought it was funny and sick? apparently you
    have never lost anyone to DWI.......
    
    REK
63.50METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Mar 30 1993 20:275
And Crews was the one piloting the boat. sigh you would think
people would learn that consuming liquor and driving,etc just
don't mix.

The Crazy Met
63.51real sadFRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyTue Mar 30 1993 20:341
    yeah Crews was the one, and I agree TCM (there ya go again!).
63.52PFSVAX::JACOBTo Be, or What????Tue Mar 30 1993 20:4421
    
    >><<< Note 63.49 by FDCV07::KING "OH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" >>>

    >>Jake, KMA You thought it was funny and sick? apparently you
    >>have never lost anyone to DWI.......
    
    REK, KYOA, yes I thought it was sick, while still being funny.  DWI was
    no part whatsoever of the joke at the time it was put in, either.  The
    DWI part was just announced today, right???????????????
    
    To say now that I'm making fun of DWI is utter bull$hit.  Get a freakin
    life and take it fer what it was, a joke.  Not an attack on anyone or
    thing.  What's next, if I put in a joke about an animal do I get nailed
    from the "Animal Friends" side, or if I put a joke in about an oil
    spill, do I get nailed from the Greenpeace side??????

    Lose the damned chip, OK??
    
    JaKe
    
    Pure and simple
63.53At least Raditz is better looking than Jake...TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie has a tooth!!!Tue Mar 30 1993 20:462
Hey, if youse guys think Jake is rude, you should meet Dick Raditz.  As the 
evening roled on, he got even more rude.
63.54METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Mar 30 1993 21:013
oh goodie a brawl in the tavern; haven't seen one of those in a while.

The Crazy Met
63.55PFSVAX::JACOBTo Be, or What????Wed Mar 31 1993 03:426
    Crews' blood-alcohol was .14%, Olins was .02(or thereabouts) and
    Ojeda's was .006.  The limit fer driving a car, or a boat in Fla is
    .10%.
    
    JaKe
    
63.57KALI::MORGANWed Mar 31 1993 11:349
    We've got one guy in here who just lost a son in an accident and I'm
    sure there are others who have lost children (myself included) of their
    own.  I'm sure there are a whole lot of us that have known someone
    who's died as a result of someone driving drunk.  And we've got a couple 
    of f'in p-brains who get woodies making jokes of tragic accidents. 
    
    Now you tell ME who should go get a life.
    
    					Steve
63.58FDCV06::KINGOH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Wed Mar 31 1993 11:573
    Thanks Steve, you said what I was feeling...
    
    REK
63.59CAMONE::WAYShane, The Wonder DogWed Mar 31 1993 12:2715
Okay, folks.

I think we've just about beat this horse to death.   Let's just let
it suffice that some of you feel one way, some of you feel another way,
and that we're all different in the way we deal with things.

Okay?  Okay.


Get the hint?

Good.


'Saw
63.60ROYALT::ASHENot by the hair of my chinny chin chinWed Mar 31 1993 14:4515
    Thanks Saw...
    
    If you want to make this a DWI discussion, move it to another note.
    If it's still an Indians discussion, fine.
    
    As much as I feel for the Indians, it seems to me I can only feel so
    bad for Olin and Ojeda if the person the most wasted of the 3 is the
    one doing the driving.  I don't care if it's his lake and boat.  Anyone
    who lets a guy that tanked get behind the wheel takes his/her own
    chances.  
    
    I don't think a joke card is in order, and it's a tragic case, but it
    seems to me that they had the opportunity to prevent this from
    happening to some degree.
    
63.62PFSVAX::JACOBTo Be, or What????Wed Mar 31 1993 19:476
    re.59,
    
    Waht are you REALLY trying to say, Saw???
    
    JaKe
    
63.63PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Apr 02 1993 16:071
    FWIW, .1% is the legal limit for most states, not just Florida.
63.64CAMONE::WAYRIP #7Fri Apr 02 1993 16:1812
>    FWIW, .1% is the legal limit for most states, not just Florida.


In addition, a lot of states are putting in a .07% limit, where you can
be charged for something like driving impaired, which is less serious
than DWI.

Bottom line, it's getting to the point where if you have a couple of
beers, it's best not to drive....


'Saw
63.65some notesSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Wed May 26 1993 17:2613
    
    	Albert Bell hit the National League Leading 15th home run the other
    day....on the down side...he is protesting a 3 day suspension for going
    after the pitcher after he was hit.  Didn't see this so....your guess
    is as good as mine.
    
    	Tommy Kramer pitched a one hitter the other day also....the one
    hit came in the 4th and it was a home run.  This is only Tommy's 2nd
    start of his carrier.
    
    
    
    	WaHooooo!
63.66PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 26 1993 18:584
63.677-6 over TexasROULET::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Thu May 27 1993 15:3213
    
    	Funny.....sorry...its Albert Belle
    
    	And he did it again....Albert Belle collected his 43rd League
    leading RBI yesterday.....as the Tribe beat Texas.....part in thanks
    to mr. Canseco who used his head to put the tribe on top.  From what
    I read...Carlos Bierga hit a fly ball to center...it hit Canseco on
    the head and bounced over the fence for a hommer.....
    
    
    
    	WaHOOOOOOOOOO!
    
63.68CNTROL::HUBERFile and ForgetThu May 27 1993 16:079
    
    Re .67
    
    Wrong Carlos (it was Martinez).
    
    BTW - You have to see it.  Has to be the funniest baseball play I've
    ever seen.
    
    Joe
63.69Albert Belle does it again....Its out-a-here!ESKIMO::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Thu Jun 03 1993 12:2513
    
    	Albert Belle got his major league leading 16th, 17th and 18th
    home run over the last couple of games against the New York Yankees.
    He also collected his major league leading 48th RBI yesterday.
    	The Indians have made resent trades to obtain some pitching.
    One starter and one reliever.  Matt Young still hasn't won a game.
    Seems to only be able to go 4 or 5 innings before getting into
    trouble.
    
    
    	WAAHOOOOO!
    
    
63.70suspension upheldESKIMO::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Fri Jun 04 1993 12:1213
    
    	The suspension of Albert Belle was upheld yesterday.  He will miss
    3 games, starting Today.  
    
    	A mistake was made in the reporting of RBI's for Albert yesterday.
    After Wednesday's game, Belle actually has a major league leading 51
    RBI's instead of the reported 48...
    
    	Too bad he is suspended right now with him hitting the ball so well
    lately.
    
    	
    	WaHoooooo!
63.71only 9 games outSTRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Jul 06 1993 12:0033
    
    	Wanted to stay out of here the last few week because I didn't want
    to jinks the team.  The Indians have been playing some good ball lately
    and after a 9 game winning streak, are only 9 games off the pace.  Good
    pitching and great hitting has been the key.  
    	Albert Belle hit two home runs in the late game yesterday to bring 
    his total up to 22 which ties him for the lead in the Americal League.
    	Kenny Loften got hit in the head after a bunt as the pitcher makes
    the throw to first base.  He shook off the hit.
    	Lots of talk about the Indians and their logo lately.  Now some
    group will try to block the building of the new stadium because of it.
    Team officials say they will stay with the Chief as their logo when
    they move next year.  I read that they are looking for someone to take
    the huge Chief Wahoo sign at the ballpark because they do not plan on
    moving it to the new park.  The baseball hall of fame said that it was
    just too big for them to take.  I hope they don't change the logo.  I
    honestly don't think it is a logo that demishes Indians at all.  In
    fact I don't understand why the Indians don't support the Team in a
    more positive way.  Man, if they were to come up with a team called
    the Hungarians or Hunks, I'd support them.  :-)
    
    	At any rate, with all the pitching problems in Cleveland, they are
    still finding ways to win.  Think about it, Nagy is out for the season
    and practically all the starters that were on the team at the beginning
    of the season are now on the disabled list.  I look for this team to
    play well after the all-star break and surprise many people.  
    
    	Strange how this season has gone so far...lots of streaks...good
    ones and bad ones.
    
    
    	The Chief
    
63.72CAMONE::WAYWashin' the dog, washin' the dogTue Jul 06 1993 12:015
Not including yesterday's results, the Indians and Red Sox are the two
hottest teams in the AL East.  Both were at 5-2 in their last 7 games.


'Saw
63.73Will it last???STRATA::WHITEHAIRThe more I get...the more I want!Tue Jul 06 1993 12:068
    
    	Not including the Indians last two losses, the Tribe actually
    gained 1 game on the Red Sox.  So, with the Sox winning the last
    12 of 13, the Indians only lost 1.5 games in the standings against
    them.
    
    	
    	The Chief
63.74Maybe they don't like baseball, much less ClevelandNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jul 06 1993 13:1211
    
    > In fact I don't understand why the Indians don't support the Team in a
    > more positive way.  Man, if they were to come up with a team called
    > the Hungarians or Hunks, I'd support them.  :-)                  
    
    Yeah, it must be those damn *real* Indians that have made the Cleveland
    bunch stink for so long.  And I'm still blaming the Red Sox' misfortunes
    over the years on the Pilgrims...
    
    glenn
     
63.75LAGUNA::MAY_BRIntel Inside, again!Tue Jul 06 1993 16:239
    
    I've got a great idea for the Cleveland Hungarians new logo.  We could
    get this gypsy, sorta a Zsa-Zsa look alike with the bandana over the
    head, big earrings, and ripped up clothes, etc. have her hand in
    someone elses pocket, like she's stealing, and in the background have
    six or seven kidsa that are obviously kidnapped.  I don't think the
    Hungarians would mind, they'd have to support the team.
    
    brews
63.76WREATH::DEVLINAgassi - the Hairless wonder...Tue Jul 06 1993 17:119
Brews -

Yeah!  Great logo.  If the hungarians did mind, I'm sure another ethnic
stereotype would love to become the symbol of Cleveland's baseball team.

Perhaps a Stephan Fetchit character, or a negro holding a lantern and
call them the Cleveland Negroes.  They'd love it!

JD
63.77Only one Hungarian for Chief WahooAKOCOA::BREENBill Breen dtn: 244-7984Wed Jul 07 1993 15:104
    If you wish to replace Chief Wahoo with a Hungarian why not that 90s
    corporate hero 
    
    		Attila the Hun(garian)
63.78CAMONE::WAYWe pruned the house tooWed Jul 07 1993 15:498
>
>    If you wish to replace Chief Wahoo with a Hungarian why not that 90s
>    corporate hero 
>    
>    		Attila the Hun(garian)


Oh, if only Hawk were still around.......
63.79SadCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Nov 05 1993 17:369
    Just heard the news on the radio coming back to the office..
    
    Indians' pitcher Cliff Young was killed in a car accident last night
    in his hometown in Texas. No other details.
    
    Tragedy continues for the Tribe.
    
    MikeL
    
63.80going for the divisionSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Wed Feb 09 1994 13:0314
    
    	Well, the Indians continue to make moves.  They pick up Tony Pena
    for a minor league contract.  He may be in as a backup.  
    
    	So, who is in the Indians division this year.  Do the Indians have
    a real chance at winning something here???  Looks like the Tribe has
    made some moves and picked up some new pitchers.  I don't remember if
    they signed the one pitcher with the scalp or not...don't think they
    did.  Will they???  I would think they want to get that memory out of
    the clubhouse.
    
    
    	WaHooooooo!
    
63.81RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetWed Feb 09 1994 15:5053
    
  >  Well, the Indians continue to make moves.  They pick up Tony Pena
  >  for a minor league contract.  He may be in as a backup.  
    
    I hope not... he'd be about my third choice among the players the
    Indians actually have signed, and about my 79th pick among the
    catchers who could be had cheaply...
    
  >  So, who is in the Indians division this year.
    
    Assuming the 3-division system goes through, Chicago, Minnesota,
    Milwaukee, and Kansas City.
    
  >  Do the Indians have a real chance at winning something here???
    
    Sure.  They are significantly better than MIN, MIL, and KC.  They
    are likely not to be as good as Chicago.  Any of the following
    could be enough to give the Indians a shot; enough of them, and
    the Indians should win the division...
    
    1) Two of the high level pitching prospects (Ogea, Lopez, Tavarez,
       Carter, Embree, Mlicki, Byrd) have significant major league
       success.
    
    2) Mark Clark pitches as well as he did at the end of 1993, Nagy
       pitches as well as he did in 1992, and Martinez pitches at near
       his peak levels.
    
    3) Jose Mesa heads off into the sunset in March.
    
    4) Frank Thomas misses significant time in 1994.
    
    5) Michael Jordan starts the year in RF for the Sox.
    
    6) Manny Ramirez starts the year in RF for the Tribe.
    
  >  Looks like the Tribe has made some moves and picked up some new
  >  pitchers.  I don't remember if they signed the one pitcher with
  >  the scalp or not...don't think they did.  Will they???  I would
  >  think they want to get that memory out of the clubhouse.
    
    They signed Martinez; he at least has been a good pitcher, whether
    or not he's got anything left.  I assume you're talking about
    Ojeda, here; he was signed to a minor league deal elsewhere (NYY?).
    
    1994 should be a good season for the Tribe.  Their offense should
    be better than in 1993, particularly when Ramirez makes the team;
    the defense should be better, too, even with Ramirez in the OF.
    The starting pitching should be better; hopefully, the youngsters
    will be ready to fill the existing holes.  If the relief pitching
    doesn't come apart, the Tribe should be well-poised for ~84 wins.
    
    Joe
63.82MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Wed Feb 09 1994 16:005
    The 3 division /new playoff format did go through a couple
    of weeks ago when the players and owners agreed on how to 
    split the gate from the extra round of playoffs.
    
    Mike
63.83Now that they're in the Central I'd like to see them win...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 09 1994 16:5317
>    Sure.  They are significantly better than MIN, MIL, and KC.  They
>    are likely not to be as good as Chicago.  Any of the following
>    could be enough to give the Indians a shot; enough of them, and
>    the Indians should win the division...
    
    Good list, Joe.  One additional thing that concerns me a bit with the
    Indians this year is the fact that the Big 3 of Baerga, Belle, and
    Lofton all pretty much had monster years (especially Belle) and the team
    still won only 76 games.  I don't know if these three cumulatively can
    be counted on to be so productive this year (I think Baerga can be even
    better; not sure about the other two).  That leaves Ramirez, Thome,
    Murray, etc. to take up some slack.  Obviously the pitching is the
    longterm need...
    
    glenn
    
63.84METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Wed Feb 09 1994 17:055
correct, Ojeda was signed by the Yankees.

How many people does the new stadium seat?

The Crazy Met
63.85Call Bob, from Account Temps.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Wed Feb 09 1994 18:3712
    
    	from what I remember...the new Cleveland Statium will seat
    somewhere around 35-40 grand.  
    
    	I figured about the same as Joe...Chicago was going to be the one
    to beat to get to the next level.......hmmmmmmm, seems like I heard
    this before.......
    
    
    	WaHoooooooo!
    
    		Go Tribe!
63.86RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetWed Feb 09 1994 20:2842
    
    Re .83
    
>    One additional thing that concerns me a bit with the
>    Indians this year is the fact that the Big 3 of Baerga, Belle, and
>    Lofton all pretty much had monster years (especially Belle) and the team
>    still won only 76 games.  I don't know if these three cumulatively can
>    be counted on to be so productive this year (I think Baerga can be even
>    better; not sure about the other two).
    
    I don't see any good reason to expect _less_ from the three
    cumulatively; Baerga will be 25 this year, Lofton 26, and Belle 27.
    While all three had their best seasons to date last year, none was
    really out of range;  Lofton's was the biggest jump, but with his
    background, he's an unusual case.  Baerga's been constantly improving
    for about 6 years now, and Belle's 1993 wasn't out of line with his
    1991.
    
>    That leaves Ramirez, Thome, Murray, etc. to take up some slack.
    
    True; OTOH, they are _much_ better than the players they are
    replacing.  Vizquel/Fermin is a wash offensively; any additional
    at bats from Alomar will improve the offense output from the
    catchers.  If Hargrove plays his cards right (platooning Vizquel
    and Espinoza, starting Ramirez in Cleveland, pushing Alomar to
    keep true to his statement that he'll try to be more selective
    at the plate, and so on), the Tribe should be able to improve on last
    year's 790 runs scored; I personally wouldn't be too surprised if
    Cleveland is near the league lead in runs scored this year.
    
>    Obviously the pitching is the longterm need...
    
    Seen the latest Baseball America?  The Tribe has continued to
    develop a _lot_ of pitching prospects.  The big four from last
    year are still around; Ogea's the only one still on track, though
    Embree could always come back.  In their place, though, are Lopez,
    and Tavarez, and Carter, and Kirkreit, and Whitten.  I know I'm
    happy with the development so far, even if it hasn't paid off yet.
    I would like to see more position prospects somewhere in the
    system, though...
    
    Joe
63.87They're getting there, but need SP and reliable RPANGLIN::WIERSBECKGolden Gopher hoops!Thu Feb 10 1994 11:478
    I'm glad to see Cleveland finally moving in the right direction.  They
    have several good young players and the potential is definately there. 
    But until that pitching comes around, I have to disagree that their
    chances are "significantly" better than a Minnesota, Milwaukee or KC. 
    It's Chicago's division to lose right now.
    
    
    Spud
63.88NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 10 1994 12:4511
    
>    But until that pitching comes around, I have to disagree that their
>    chances are "significantly" better than a Minnesota, Milwaukee or KC. 
>    It's Chicago's division to lose right now.
    
    I'd have to agree.  I think that Joe is right if you're predicting what
    will happen over the next five years, but right at this moment
    Cleveland is in that pack and not indisputably above it...
    
    glenn
    
63.89RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetThu Feb 10 1994 18:1030
       
    Re .87, .88
    
>    I'd have to agree.  I think that Joe is right if you're predicting what
>    will happen over the next five years, but right at this moment
>    Cleveland is in that pack and not indisputably above it...
    
    I'd have to disagree.  Cleveland's clearly superior to Minnesota;
    Cleveland scored 100 more runs while allowing fewer _last_ year, and
    should be better this year.  Milwaukee's closer, with only 50 fewer
    runs scored and a slightly better ERA, but for Milwaukee's an older
    team - Vaughn's 28, Surhoff and Hamilton are 29, and Yount's in his
    late thirties.  There are some players who might improve - Nilsson,
    Jaha, and Listach should be better in 1994 - but the pitching staff
    is no better off and one year older.  Given that Cleveland should
    show marked improvement, they should have no problem staying ahead of
    Milwaukee.  Kansas City was the closest to equal with the Tribe in
    1994 - 115 fewer runs scored, ~80 more earned runs allowed, plus
    some number of unearned runs.  But Kansas City is the most likely
    to fall apart.  Jose should be better, but Brett's gone, McRae
    overperformed in 1993, and the rest of the team is getting along
    in years.  Lind & Macfarlane are 29, Joyner is 31, Gagne and Coleman
    are 32, and Gaetti is 35.
    
    Sure, one of these teams _could_ be better than Cleveland in 1994.
    And yes, Cleveland's chance in 2-or-3 years are better than next
    year.  But Cleveland is (IMHO) clearly above Minnesota, Milwaukee, and
    KC heading into 1994.
    
    Joe
63.90Pitching, especially young pitching, is too hard to predictNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 10 1994 20:4625
>>    I'd have to agree.  I think that Joe is right if you're predicting what
>>    will happen over the next five years, but right at this moment
>>    Cleveland is in that pack and not indisputably above it...
>    
>    I'd have to disagree.  Cleveland's clearly superior to Minnesota;
>    Cleveland scored 100 more runs while allowing fewer _last_ year, and
>    should be better this year.  Milwaukee's closer, with only 50 fewer
    
    The analysis is generally sound, Joe, but perhaps as with Spud, I only
    object to the terms like "significantly better" and "clearly superior",
    etc.  We're talking about a group of teams all of which won around 70-75
    games last season, except for KC, which played over its head a bit and 
    won 84.  In Minnesota, you're talking about a team that was World
    Champion in 1991, won 90 games in 1992, and then suffered a train-wreck
    disaster of a season in 1993.  They are on the decline (probably not
    for long), but there's a basis for believing that they're not near as
    bad as they looked last season.  Cleveland has hopes, too, but it still 
    comes down to that shaky pitching staff, where there's a question mark
    next to each and every starter's name (including Martinez, based on his 
    second half).  It could be good enough to win at least a wild card, it 
    could be terrible and result in a 3rd or 4th place finish.  
    
    glenn
    
63.91HANNAH::ASHEDon't ask me, I'm just the adviserThu Feb 10 1994 21:552
    They're in the right direction?  They signed Tony Pena and Jack
    Morris...
63.92we have the want to winSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Fri Feb 11 1994 10:5211
    
    	The Tribe signs.......
    
    
    			J A C K   M O R R I S 
    
    
    			to a one year contract.
    
    
    		WaHooooooo!
63.93Jack Morris? Indians have filled their quota on aging stiffsNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Feb 11 1994 12:198
    Wahoo is right, Hal.  Jack Morris was only *the* worst pitcher in the
    league last year, and the second place finisher wasn't close.  If the
    Indians give Morris 10-15 starts to "work it out" like the Jays did
    last year, I'd downgrade expectations accordingly...
    
    glenn
     
63.94I'm sure you're glad about that GlennCNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopFri Feb 11 1994 12:509
>>                      <<< Note 63.93 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
>>     -< Jack Morris? Indians have filled their quota on aging stiffs >-


	How'd he get by the Red Soxs? Oh Yeah that's right they moved
        buffet table Lou upstairs. Otherwise, Jack would have been in
        finishing out his career in Fenway....

 mike
63.95RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetFri Feb 11 1994 13:1437
    
    Re .93
    
>    Wahoo is right, Hal.  Jack Morris was only *the* worst pitcher in the
>    league last year, and the second place finisher wasn't close.  If the
>    Indians give Morris 10-15 starts to "work it out" like the Jays did
>    last year, I'd downgrade expectations accordingly...
    
    But doesn't he make a lovely battery mate for Tony Pena?  B^)
    
    Fortunately, none of his contract is guarenteed.  The really sad
    thing about it is that Morris & Pena could have massive comebacks
    and still stink.
    
    On a less negative note, the Tribe signed Steve Farr.  Farr did
    have a poor year in '93, and is at an age where that could be a
    sign of things to come, but had pitched well for a number of
    years beforehand and came cheaply.  Signing Farr is much like
    signing Martinez or Murray - they probably won't really hurt the
    Tribe.  All I can hope is that Pena was signed to help Levis with
    his defense and Morris was signed to keep Martinez happy (he's
    complained about the lack of other signing) until Dennis actually
    _sees_ how good the kids are.  OK, I guess there's the possibility
    that he's learned to throw a monster knuckle ball and still has
    three years left in him... B^)
    
    Morris - a worse pitcher than Jose Mesa!
    Pena - a worse hitter than Jose Mesa!
    
    Re superiority
    
    Hey, I'm a fan of the Tribe - do you expect me to be completely
    objective?  B^)  (I do believe that the expectations for the Tribe
    should logically be much better than for the Twins/Brewers/Royals,
    but also might admit that my bias plays into that belief...)
    
    Joe
63.9638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 11 1994 13:569
63.97Maybe the Sox have changedAD::HEATHHave pitchers and catchers reported yet?Fri Feb 11 1994 14:514
    
    
      Did the Indians GM sit to close to Lou Gorman during the winter
    Meetings? :*)
63.9838346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 11 1994 15:048
63.99Lou's Rule: when in doubt, sign the guy who's older...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Feb 11 1994 16:1612
                                  
>    How soon they forget.  Lou passed on Morris before and signed Viola
>    instead. 
    
    Uh, not quite Mac.  Lou had a very clearly stated preference for
    Morris, but the Blue Jays outbid the field.  Viola was signed after
    Morris, late in the signing period.  If Lou later claimed that he 
    somehow made the right choice while the Jays made the mistake then 
    it's just one more example of Lourevisionism at its finest...
    
    glenn
    
63.100When's the first broadcast?ANGLIN::WIERSBECKGolden Gopher hoops!Fri Feb 11 1994 18:5616
    Joe, it's great to see Indians fans sticking up for their team.  I
    think a lot of baseball fans wouldn't mind seeing them do well this
    year and you know once that pitching comes around they will be tough.
    As Glenn says, it could go either way for them this year.  I think the
    signing of Eddie Murray will help, but didn't they also pick up
    Martinez from Montreal?  If not, who was the pitcher they signed awhile
    back?  I also don't think much of picking up Morris and Pena, but
    you've got nothing to lose really.
    
    Hang with them, they should reward you down the road.
    
    Now for my train-wreck Twins...  :*)  Ahhh, that's another note, but
    hey, if the pitching comes around???
    
    
    Spud
63.101RICKS::HUBERFile and ForgetSat Feb 12 1994 12:2742
    
    Re .100
    
    Spud,
    
>    Joe, it's great to see Indians fans sticking up for their team.  I
>    think a lot of baseball fans wouldn't mind seeing them do well this
>    year and you know once that pitching comes around they will be tough.
>    As Glenn says, it could go either way for them this year.
    
    That's what I don't agree with.  The Indians should be better
    everywhere but the bullpen; even that could be more productive this
    year if Steve Farr pitches like he did 2 years ago.  I don't
    believe they will necessarily be in contention this year - _that_
    will take some doing - but without anything out of the ordinary
    (such as an Aaron Sele-like preformance by one of the young pitchers)
    85 wins is IMHO a reasonable estimate.  If everything breaks right,
    they win 95 and the central.
    
>    I think the
>    signing of Eddie Murray will help, but didn't they also pick up
>    Martinez from Montreal?  If not, who was the pitcher they signed awhile
>    back?  I also don't think much of picking up Morris and Pena, but
>    you've got nothing to lose really.
    
    Yup, it was Martinez.  And w/ Morris & Pena, my only worry is that they
    will take away playing time from better, but "less proven" players.
    Hopefully they'll either flop in Spring training or come back
    
>    Hang with them, they should reward you down the road.
    
    Hey, I'm a Cleveland fan - I've never seen a championship in any sport
    during my lifetime, and only a couple of runner-up finishes (by the
    Force).  Think I'd give them up just because they don't improve
    fast enough?  B^)
    
>    Now for my train-wreck Twins...  :*)  Ahhh, that's another note, but
>    hey, if the pitching comes around???
    
    Actually, I like the Twins' chances better than Milwaukee or KC.
    
    Joe
63.102Could this be the year???SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Mar 09 1994 10:417
    
    	Jack Morris pitched for the first time in an Indians uniform
    the other day.  The old man pitched two hitless innings and only
    threw 17 pitches.  The Tribe is now 4 - 2 in exibition.
    
    
    	WaHooooo!
63.103WHY NOT?SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Mar 28 1994 11:4613
    
    	I also predict that the CLEVELAND INDIANS will win the Central this
    	year.
    
    
    	Gotta see the movie.....MAJOR LEAGUE II
    
    	My only question is...when did MAJOR LEAGUE come out?  I was
    thinking that I came out the year Synider was on the cover of Sports
    Illustrated.  Does anyone know?
    
    
    	Wa HOOOOOOOOOOO!
63.104TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHGotta go running - April's comingMon Mar 28 1994 19:073
63.105CAMONE::WAYValorMon Mar 28 1994 19:358
Major League -- it came out after Sheen was in Platoon.  Platoon was 
in 1986, so I'd be ML came out in 1987 at least.  I don't believe it
came out before Platoon....


'Saw


63.106HANNAH::ASHElike sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his livesMon Mar 28 1994 20:252
    It was before Wesley Snipes became big...  I'd say ML was more like
    90 or so... Post LA Law (Bernsen)
63.107Nino Brown rules the World!!!1CNTROL::CHILDSDean's gone fishin'Tue Mar 29 1994 12:155
 too bad Wesley now feels too big to do the Sequel. He's a great actor
 and will be sorely missed imo........

 mike
63.108Pre-season ends.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Apr 01 1994 11:397
    
    	Looks like the Indians are ready to go.  Jack Morris is pitching 
    strong and the Tribe is getting the runs.  
    	Today, the Indians play the Reds in Columbus in the Annual Ohio Cup
    game.  I have no idea of the Annual record.  Anyone???
    
    	WaHooooooo!
63.109"Major League II"SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Apr 04 1994 10:439
    
    	Well, I had to see the movie "Major League II" yesterday.  Before 
    seeing it I went out and rented "Major League" again.  I won't say 
    much about this movie because I know all of you will be going down to
    see it.  I will say that if "Major League" was a 5 tear jerker and 2
    hankies, "Major League II" is a 3 tear jerker and 1 hanky.  My bet...
    there will be a "Major League III" comming soon...the Big one.
    
    	hw 
63.110don't do it againCSTEAM::FARLEYTue Apr 05 1994 13:1414
    
    
    	Yabbut Hal,
    
    Just a nit 'cause you probably forgot but in da ::Sportsbar, we
    describe moovies as "Cindy" movies.  Hankies are used to describe dat
    moovie star, Tom Hankies, son of Mr. and Ms. Kleenex!
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    honking in hankies!
    Kev
    
63.111not bad for a Cindy movieFRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantTue Apr 05 1994 16:111
    I saw the "Joy Luck Club" over the weekend.  
63.112CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Tue Apr 05 1994 16:2410
How's the new park?

I saw bits and pieces of it on the Sunday night ESPN telecast, and
it looks fascinating.

I'm really thrilled with this tendency to be building parks more like
the olds ones (ie Camden Yards and now Cleveland and Arlington)....


'saw
63.113Indians win another on the road!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Apr 13 1994 12:1413
    
    	The Tribe has finally started the season on the right foot.  Now 
    	5-1 and going strong.  Good pitching from Clark, Martinez, Morris
    	and Naggy.  The rookie Danny R. is ripping the ball.  
    
    
    	Go Tribe!
    
    
    	WaHooooo!
    
    		The Chief...
    
63.1146-5 winSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Apr 14 1994 11:309
    
    	The Tribe wins again and has the best record in the American
    League!  
    
    	Go Indians!
    
    		WaHooooo!
    
    			The Chief...
63.115PTOVAX::JACOBDamn, that toe hurts!!!!!Thu Apr 14 1994 19:376
    Hey Hal,
    
    ya happen to see that there's still 150+ games left on the schedule????
    
    JaKe
    
63.116Best start that I can ever remember!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Apr 15 1994 15:476
    
    	Ya-but, when the tribes best record at the start of season since
    1966 was 10-9....you have to be just a little excited.
    
    	Wa Hoooo!
    		The Chief...
63.117CNTROL::CHILDSBrillant, Charming and NastyFri Apr 15 1994 16:524
 but when was the last time you were just a little excited, Hal?

 mike
63.118now 7-4 and still in first.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Apr 20 1994 11:4013
    
    	Well, it didn't last for long......the Indians lost three in a row,
    in Cleveland against the Royals over the weekend.  But, they are back
    on their winning ways winning last night 7-6 against Minn..
    	I really don't like how these games have gone since the start of
    the season.  Seems like they have been winning in the late innings and
    haven't been getting strong relief work from the bullpin.  
    	
    	Go Tribe!
    
    		WaHooooooo
    
    			The Chief...
63.119ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetWed Apr 20 1994 16:1531
    
    Re .118
    
>    	I really don't like how these games have gone since the start of
>    the season.  Seems like they have been winning in the late innings and
>    haven't been getting strong relief work from the bullpin.  
    
    The bullpen will be fine; or at least, Plunk, Lilliquist, and Farr
    (if he stays healthy) will be, and likely Turner as well.  Mesa still
    can't pitch, though.
    
    Actually, now that the season's underway, I like the Tribe's chances
    a bit more:
    
    1) Ramirez is the right fielder.
    2) Nagy is pitching well.
    3) Clark is pitching well.
    4) Most of the AAA staff is pitching well.
    5) Morris is pitching close to 1992 levels, which isn't good, but
       is potentially useful.
    
    OTOH:
    
    1) Vizquel is hitting second.
    2) Hargrove is using the sacrifice _far_ too much.
    
    On the balance, it looks like the Tribe should be able to stay in
    the race, which it wasn't clear they would manage going into the
    season.
    
    Joe
63.120still in the hunt!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue May 17 1994 11:5236
    
    	The Tribe has been haveing their trouble as of late but after
    	sweeping the Tigers they are only 1.5 games back of that other
    	Chicago team.
    
    	As mentioned in the Browns note, the Indians went on a big loosing
    	streak, someing like 1-7 on the road.  From what I
        read/heard/watched, most of the problem has been with the fielding
    	and pitching.  You can't win games when you give up 6 and 7 runs
    	a game.  Things seem to be comming around now though with the 
    	Indians scoring something like 26 runs in three games.  Also lets
    	give Jack Morris some credit, his last game, 9 K's in 6 innings.
    	Something like 16 K's for the game with this new guy getting 4 K's
    	in the 9th.  
    
    	Hopefully the Tribe can keep things together.  Again, as with the 
    	Browns, the Indians will have to win the division to make it to the
    	playoffs.  I just can't see them getting the wildcard spot this
    	year. 
    
    	The rookie Manny Ram...is kicking some but.  Look down the Leader
    	stats and all you see in Cleve, Cleve, Cleve.....
    
    	Average: Loften & Bell....something like 385.
    	Runs:  Loften over 50
    	Triples:  Bell tops in the league.
    	Doubles:  Bell and Bearga are right there.
    	HR's:  Bell and Rameriz (sp) at 10.
    	Stolen Bases:  Loften leads the league.
    	Pitching.....this is the problem!!!
    
    
    	Go Tribe!
    
    
    		WaHooooooo! 
63.121winning despite bad pitchingANGLIN::WIERSBECKTwins ERA=Enormous Runs AllowedTue May 17 1994 13:216
    As for not being able to win by giving up six or seven runs, yes that's
    true over the long haul.  But the Twins have found a way, going 18-19
    so far with a league worst 6.71 ERA.
    
    
    Spud
63.122MKFSA::LONGDancin' INSIDE the fireThu Jun 02 1994 19:118
	I just found out that the name of the baseball stadium in Cleveland
	is "Jacobs Field".

	JaKe, would you care to fill us in on your Cleveland lineage?



	billl
63.123just look at how green the grass isFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaThu Jun 02 1994 19:201
    Jake's ancestors used the sight for their outhouses.
63.124PTOVAX::JACOBThu Jun 02 1994 19:4912
    
    >>Jake's ancestors used the sight for their outhouses.
    
    How'd ya know that Mike????
    
    Actually, Clevescum's new park is "Jacobs" not"Jacob" like my lasted
    name.  It scared me in the beginning that some of my family might
    actually live there, but then I came to my senses and realized that we
    don't have any sh_t shovellers in our fambily.
    
    JaKe
    
63.125Indians in "94" World Series!!!BSS::J_VANMETERFri Jun 03 1994 16:3316
    re: 124
    
    I just can't resist this one.
    
    Jake;
    
    No sh*t shovelers eh?
    
    Just sh*theads!
    
    I personally think that Jacobs field is a class ball park, looking
    forward to attending a Indians game there in August.
    
    jeff
    
    
63.126ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetFri Jun 03 1994 17:0613
    
    Re .125
    
    > Indians in "94" World Series!!!
    
    Now that's something I can see happening.  (OK, it will take a _lot_
    of things breaking the right way, but it's not out of the range of
    possibility.)
    
    Good luck to you Jeff; sorry to see a vocal Cleveland fan go even if
    I think you're deluding yourself w.r.t. the Browns.
    
    Joe
63.127ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetTue Jun 14 1994 15:569
    
    Worth noting:
    
    1) If the baseball season ended today, the Indians would be in the
       playoffs.
    
    2) The Indians have the best home record in baseball.
    
    Joe
63.128CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Jun 14 1994 16:206
    If "If and But's" were "candy and nuts", what a fine Christmas we
    all would have...
    
    A favorite from second grade...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
63.129ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetTue Jun 14 1994 17:454
    
    Hey, for an Indians fan "Ifs" are a big step forward.  B^)
    
    Joe
63.130TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue Jun 14 1994 18:002
Yabut if the pitching (read Jack Morris) holds up, I think the Indians have a
legit chance to get into the 'offs.
63.131WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Jun 14 1994 18:004
    
    
        Could be worse Joe, Your team might be 75 years w/o a WS
    Championship.
63.132METSNY::francuscould be heaven or this could be hellTue Jun 14 1994 18:0915
1. Indians getting into the playoffs as a wild-card is one more reason why
the realignment is bogus. If they were finally gonna get into the playoffs
they should have to win the division.

re: .131

2. Indians last won the WS in 1948, pennant in 1954. Fortunately for
their fans since 1954 the Indians have never contended; heartbreaks
happen when a team is soooo close and just can't win. Consider if
the Red Sox had not had any real contenders for 75 years or the Rangers in
54 years the frustration wouldn't be quite the same as it is; probably
not even close.

The Crazy Met
63.133CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Jun 14 1994 18:295
    Try being a Cub fan...
    
    1908 and counting...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
63.134CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunTue Jun 14 1994 18:535
 po' po' TCS, still trying to convince somebody that his suffering is
 the greatest....

 ;^)
63.135MSBCS::BRYDIETCM - World's Greatest SandbaggerTue Jun 14 1994 18:597
  > po' po' TCS, still trying to convince somebody that his suffering is
  > the greatest....
    
    Kind of tough to argue with him. The poor SOB has to be around himself
    24 hours a day. If that ain't suffering...
    
63.136now what was that Tommy said about getting personal?METSNY::francuscould be heaven or this could be hellTue Jun 14 1994 19:006
nah, Red Sox fans have suffered longer and have had worst nightmares - Rangers
have been frustrating but so far nothing quite like 1986; after tonight that
may no longer be the case.

The Crazy Met

63.137PTOVAX::JACOBTue Jun 14 1994 19:3916
    
    >>Hey, for an Indians fan "Ifs" are a big step forward.  B^)
    
    
    "If" yer uncle had t_ts, you'd call him aunt!!
    
    "If" a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass every time he jumps!!!
    
    
    "If" a Clevescum fan had brains, he'd root fer a real team from
    Pittsburgh.
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
63.138Best in the CentralSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Jun 15 1994 11:2811
    
    	Indians on the war path!  Takes game two from Toronto.  Mesa gets
    the win and the Tribe is on a 4 game roll.  First place all by
    ourselves.  What a deal!
    
    	Go Tribe!
    
    		WaHooooooooo!
    
    	The Chief
    
63.139another sweep!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jun 16 1994 11:1813
    
    	The beat goes on in the Rock n Roll capital.  The Tribe sweeps the
    Blue Jays winning the final game in 13 innings, 4-3.  This makes 6 in
    a row and something like 15 straight at Jacobs field.  The 14 or 15
    straight is the best ever for the Indians since 1957.
    
    	WaHooooooo!
    
    	Looks like another sweep may just happen this weekend with the Red
    Sox comming to town.  And with the way their playing, it looks like the
    streak may go on.....and on.......and on.......and on.
    
    	The Chief
63.140Just curious why your in here only when things are goin wellAD::HEATHThis is it.. the end of the curse. Sox '94 champsThu Jun 16 1994 12:3510
    
    
    
    
       Yo Chief.....
    
       About the Red Sox comming to town and the possibility of a sweep. 
    Would you care to back that statement up?????
    
    Jerry
63.141why ask whyMETSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsThu Jun 16 1994 13:556
re: .140

that is the Hal we all know, never here when the going gets tough.

The Crazy Met

63.142Clemens is going Saturday, I'm holding out for one ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 16 1994 14:1310
    
> that is the Hal we all know, never here when the going gets tough.
                                                    
    Well, even as bad as the Sox are playing right now, if he has the
    cajones to make such a blatant KOD prediction as a four-game Indians' 
    sweep, he better have his butt back in here Monday if it doesn't
    happen... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
63.143What are you willing to do if they do???SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jun 16 1994 14:1814
    
    	Clemens is washed up!  It will not be him that beats the Tribe if
    they lose.....one game.  The way the Indians have been playing at home
    (best in the majors), the possibility is certainly there.  You can bet
    the park will be sold out each and every game!
    
    	WaHoooooooo!
    
    	The rookie goes tonight and this will be the sox only chance for a
    win in Cleveland!  Lets ROCK!
    
    	GO TRIBE!
    
    		The Chief
63.144CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Thu Jun 16 1994 14:325
>    	Clemens is washed up!  


Yes, folks, there you have it.  Objective Baseball Analysis according
to Hal.....
63.145And since when is Jason Grimsley a rookie?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 16 1994 15:0213
>                 -< What are you willing to do if they do??? >-
    
    Are we talking my one Boston win to your Cleveland sweep?  How about a
    week of "Morris/Clemens can't sniff Clemens'/Morris' jock?"  (They're
    not going head-to-head, alas, but it'll do).  Granted, the risk on my
    part isn't that great, but those who know me will vouch that the 
    chance would be the most personally distressing result possible, so 
    the payoff's big.  And since you're the one flapping your gums about 
    a sweep...
    
    glenn
    
63.146DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameThu Jun 16 1994 16:027
63.147WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Thu Jun 16 1994 16:058
    
    
          Hal you can't really believe Clemens is wahed up do you? He's
    better than any tribe pitcher including Mr Clark. It's his team that
    sips not him.
    
    
    Chap
63.148ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetThu Jun 16 1994 17:2721
    
    Re .147
    
>    Hal you can't really believe Clemens is wahed up do you? He's better
>    than any tribe pitcher including Mr Clark. It's his team that sips
>    not him.
    
    Including Mr. Clark?  Clark's the third best pitcher on the Tribe
    right now, _maybe_ second best, and that's only if we don't include
    the prospects.
    
    And while Clemens is doing better than Nagy this season, I wouldn't
    be terribly surprised if Nagy has a better career from this point on
    (though, career-wise, he's obviously not going to catch Clemens).
    
    Risking the wrath of the Baseball Gods, I'll join Hal in his
    prediction for a Tribe sweep.  Knowing how poorly my predictions
    come out, this is almost certainly a KoD, but what the heck...
    
    Joe
    
63.149It's a long season - or is it?ANGLIN::WIERSBECKTwins ERA=Enormous Runs AllowedThu Jun 16 1994 17:3610
    Maybe I'm bold or maybe not, but it seems to me this would be the time
    for Boston to rebound a little.  They've gone through a bad stretch
    (especially at home) and it will do them a world of good to get away
    from Fenway now.
    
    I look for Boston to at least split.  Then my Twinners can take over
    first!  That's if we continue our winning ways.  :*O
    
    
    Spud
63.150Just say the wordAD::HEATHThis is it.. the end of the curse. Sox '94 champsThu Jun 16 1994 17:5112
    
    
    
       OK Chief and Joe.....
    
      I am willing to make any type of non-monitary wager ie pname bet with
    either or both of you.  Cleveland will not sweep and my guess is a
    split.  Please let me know if either of you are interested I would be 
    glad to take you up on it.  And as far as Clemens and being washed up
    I will say that game will be won by the sox.
    
    Jerry
63.151Swindell > ClemensSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jun 16 1994 18:3118
    
    	I think I would rather play this series for a buck a run........
    
    	and I still don't think the sox will turn it around in Cleveland.
    	The Tribe is ROCK'EN right now.  Murphy is killing the ball.
    
    	Did anyone see Suwey (SP) pitch the other night??  What a wild man.
    	But he can surely throw one hell of a fast ball!  No control
    	though.  At the end of the game with guys on 2nd and 3rd, 1 run
    	lead and its..........STRIKE THREE!  You see him comming off the
    	mound with this wild look in his eyes...F__K YEA! he says....if you
    	read lips.....
    
    	Ok, which games are on the tube this series???
    
    		WaHoooooo!
    
    	The Chief
63.152CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Thu Jun 16 1994 18:361
Okay, who slipped the LSD into Hal's coke again?
63.153Is SUWEY an Arkansas boy? ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 16 1994 18:4211
>                   -< Swindell > Clemens >-
    
    The correct spelling and case for this comparison is SWIDELL > CLEMONS.
    As expressed above, it just doesn't make any sense.
    
    Funny, I didn't see any response to Jerry's or my p-name bait...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.154METSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsThu Jun 16 1994 18:436
Folks this may be the only time you ever see Glenn offer a p_name
bet - I know I can't remember another time that he has done that. Take
him up on it, don't lose out on this unique opportunity.

The Crazy Met

63.155That's right, my p-name space is virginal...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 16 1994 18:451
    
63.156too good of an opportunity to pass up...CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunThu Jun 16 1994 18:524
 can I take you up on it?????????

 ;^)
63.157ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetThu Jun 16 1994 19:226
    
    Re .153
    
    I took Jerry up on his offer via email.
    
    Joe
63.158CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunThu Jun 16 1994 19:494
 It's Glenn or nothing for me.........

;^)
63.159I'm waiting for Hal...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 16 1994 20:298
> It's Glenn or nothing for me.........
    
    For you MikeC, substitute Maddux' name for Morris' and you've got a
    deal.  You really think that the Indians are going to sweep?
    
    glenn
    
63.160Lets R O C KSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jun 17 1994 11:2432
    
    	AAAAAAHHHAAHHAAHAHA!  I was laughing my butt off last night and
    almost woke up the whole family when the game ended.  Why should I
    expect less???  Not this year, the Indians have gotten where they are
    right now because of the late inning heroics just like yesterdays game.
    With the Tribe playing this well, this early in the season...anything
    is possible.  Cleveland, for the last several years always seemed to
    start the season bad but end playing some of the best ball in the
    league.  I hope the trend continues this year.
    	I thought it was great watching that game.  How many people were
    there?  At many parks, going into the ninth down two runs, the stadium
    would be half empty.  Oh NO!  Not in Cleveland!  I don't think one fan
    left the game.  Here we were, bottom of the ninth, two outs, down by
    one run, winning run on 2nd, the best hitter on the Tribe at the plate,
    1st base open,..........the crowd is standing and going crazy, the song
    "WE WILL, WE WILL, ROCK YOU" is playing in the background.........the
    pitch.........the swing..........SMACK!!!  Albert Belle lines a single
    to left center......one run scores......Carlos Bearga turns third base
    and slides head first to home plate......the throw is wide and the 
    place goes wild!!!!  Man, it was like we just won the world series.  I
    really wonder how we will handle the playoffs this year.....Its going
    to be one hell of a ride!  YeeeeeHa!
    	Looks like I'll be taken out the broom this weekend.......
    
    
    	WaHooooooooooo!
    
    Did ya see the resturant out in the left field corner?  Looked nice!
    
    
    		The Chief
    
63.161damn ear wax, I thought I heard you say...AKOCOA::BREENFri Jun 17 1994 12:134
    did you really say, first base was open, winning run on second and he
    pitched to albert belle?!!!!  Two outs???
    
    I was gonna let butch break .500...
63.162Show some JewelsAD::HEATHThis is it.. the end of the curse. Sox '94 champsFri Jun 17 1994 12:3810
    
    
     Hey yo Chief.....
    
       I still see your talking trash why not show a little guts like Joe
    and back that prediction of a sweep up.  I quess what Jake says is true
    about people from Clevescum.
    
    Jerry
    
63.1631 down, 3 to go...ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetFri Jun 17 1994 12:4019
    
    Re .161
    
    Can't really blame Hobson too much for that one.  If you pitch around
    Belle, it's only to get to Murray, who still eats up righties.  And
    Belle _hasn't_ hit Russell historically.
    
    I was impressed with Grimsley's outing.  He was striking batters out,
    not walking batters, and not giving up many hits.  Sure, you don't
    want to see the home runs, but I can live with that from a fifth
    starter.
    
    Meanwhile, Sele was living on the edge; if it weren't for his control, 
    the game would have been a blowout.  Perhaps he's coming back from
    his overuse.
    
    That had to have been the most enjoyable game I've seen in a while...
    
    Joe
63.164worth the try, seeing my pname like a cathouseCNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunFri Jun 17 1994 12:4010
 Glenn, I'd root for just about anybody to hang a pname on ya, but I do
 like the Indians. Simply because they've been so inept for years and
 I like Joey Belle......

 anyways if you still want to bet let me know today before 11:00 as I'm out
 here around then...but I get choose the pname you wear if by some miracle
 they do sweep........

 mike
63.165NAC::G_WAUGAMANRussell must die!Fri Jun 17 1994 13:1014
    
    Testing, testing...
    
> anyways if you still want to bet let me know today before 11:00 as I'm out
> here around then...but I get choose the pname you wear if by some miracle
> they do sweep........
    
    What the heck, you're on, if you don't mind waiting behind Joe Huber if
    the Indians do sweep (geez, still nothing from Hal).  I have it on good 
    authority that Roger's grandmama is going to be at the game Saturday,
    which gives me renewed confidence... ;-)
    
    glenn
     
63.166CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Fri Jun 17 1994 13:3718
>    the Indians do sweep (geez, still nothing from Hal).  I have it on good 


C'mon Glenn.

You've been in this file for years.  You KNOW Hal.

He talks trash when the team is winning, disappears for weeks when they
finally turn belly-up and glassy-eyed, and then comes back crowing for the
start of the next Cleveland season.

Would Hal EVER back up his predicitons with a p-name bet?  Not on yer
life.  Take it to the bank.....


'Saw


63.167He is a *fan*NAC::G_WAUGAMANYou promised to retire,right Jeff?Fri Jun 17 1994 13:4210
    
> He talks trash when the team is winning, disappears for weeks when they
> finally turn belly-up and glassy-eyed, and then comes back crowing for the
> start of the next Cleveland season.
    
    ...but you gotta love him...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.168CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Fri Jun 17 1994 13:449
>                               -< He is a *fan* >-

A fan sits here and takes it when his team takes the gaspipe.

    
>    ...but you gotta love him...

Wouldn't be SPORTS without him!    

63.169 I'm going to the closet.......SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jun 17 1994 15:0911
    
    	WAAAAHOOOOOOOOOO!
    
    	GAME 1:  TRIBE 7 - 6
    	GAME 2:  TRIBE (FILL IN ANY NUMBER YOU WISH)
    	GAME 3:  TRIBE   "          "           "
    	GAME 4:  TRIBE   "          "           "
    
    
    		The Chief
    
63.170DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameFri Jun 17 1994 15:406
    	At least Hal is main enough to give the points when his team
    is favored, unlike another one who talked trash about how his team
    was going to crush and demolish the Pats then refused to give a
    lousy 10 points...  8^)
    
    				   /Don
63.171ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetSat Jun 18 1994 03:588
    
    In case anyone misses it in light of the (at this time) ongoing
    OJ saga...
    
    The Tribe won 8-1 tonight.  Halfway to a sweep - the toughest one
    comes tomorrow...
    
    Joe
63.172I'm really enjoying this... B^)ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetSat Jun 18 1994 21:3711
    
    3/4 of the way home.  Wasn't so tough after all, I guess; unfortunately
    I missed the game but I do understand there was some controversy about
    something.
    
    Nagy vs. Finvold tomorrow.  My personal name is now safe; the same
    can't be said for Jerry and Glenn.
    
    Joe
    
    P.S. Now with no "if"s - the Indians _have_ the best record in the AL.
63.173MSE1::FRANCUSNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsSun Jun 19 1994 20:084
    I can't wait to see the p_name's that some folks will be wearing.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
63.174B^)ROCK::HUBERFile and ForgetSun Jun 19 1994 22:4623
    
    Re .173
    
    Any and all suggestions may be mailed to TRIBE::HUBER.  B^)
    
    It was Morris rather than Nagy today; which, now, I'm glad for, since
    Nagy will pitch the next game.
    
    I think Hobson could get fired as a result of this series; from what
    I saw and listened to of the games, that's not really fair, but that's
    baseball.  And I do like Wathan as a manager.
    
    Hargrove really seems to have the Tribe together now; while I'm
    not convinced that he's the best manager in the world, he seems to
    do a number of things well - use the running game, manage personalities
    and egos, get _everyone_ work (though he does have a doghouse for the
    bullpen), and other than Baerga he seems to be getting the young
    hitters to walk.
    
    9 in a row overall; 18 in a row at home.  I don't remember the Indians
    ever being in such a good position in June.
    
    Joe
63.175Excuse me....what did you say??SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Jun 20 1994 11:0215
    
    	As I said.....
    
    
    		SHOOSH		SHOOSH		SHOOSH
    
    
    
    	Next.....Detroit
    
    
    	WaHooooooooo
    
    
    		The Chief
63.176Waitin for Joe to show to be humiliatedAD::HEATHThis is it.. the end of the curse. Sox '94 champsMon Jun 20 1994 11:247
    
    
    Go away Cheif....If you had any faith whatsoever in your team you'd a
    steped up to the plate and took the pname bet.  Crawl back under the
    rock or better yet take a swim in that river that catches on fire....
    
    Jerry
63.177The streak continues...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Jun 20 1994 11:4012
    
    	Funny how you want to give me crap but where were you when I
    offered the buck a run deal???  Don't feel bad bud, the Tribe is
    the best in the American League!  Why would you expect to do any
    better than just making a few games close?  Get a new team!  Join
    the waggon, jump on board for the ride of a lifetime.
    
    	WaHoooooooooooooo
    
    			SHOOSH	SHOOSH	SHOOSH	SHOOSH
    
    		The Chief
63.178NAC::G_WAUGAMANClemens can't carry Morris' jockMon Jun 20 1994 12:3420
    
    As I can't yet get into my mail account on another node to receive my
    punishment from Joe, the above is a preview for Childsey...
    
>    3/4 of the way home.  Wasn't so tough after all, I guess; unfortunately
>    I missed the game but I do understand there was some controversy about
>    something.
    
    Well, it was 1-1 with two outs in the sixth before Belle hit that 
    two-run HR.  As is often the case with this sorry-assed bunch, the
    first mistake Clemens makes will often be enough to cost him 
    the ballgame.  The controversy came an inning later when Baerga 
    hooked one foul past the RF foul pole, which was ruled fair by Greg
    Kosc (not that it mattered by that point).  Apparently Kosc's 
    blindness continued into Sunday on a play at the plate, but I didn't
    personally see it as, fortunately, I was not able to torture myself 
    watching any of these games (just heard some of Saturday's)... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
63.179CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Mon Jun 20 1994 12:466
>    	Funny how you want to give me crap but where were you when I
>    offered the buck a run deal???  


Where he should have been.  You know the rules about monetary wagering 
in here....
63.180CHIEFF::CHILDSTemptation is a GunMon Jun 20 1994 12:564
 I sent you mail Glenn hopefully you'll get it soon and wear it proudly...

 ;^)
63.181ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Jun 20 1994 12:5717
    
    Jerry & Glenn,
    
    After going over various ideas (Clemens put downs, Hobson & Russell
    deification, and so on), I've decided instead to go with the above.
    Short, sweet, and to the point, if not as nasty as some would prefer.
    
    Hal,
    
    Try the above pname for a week.  If we've got 4 people - just 4 people
    - using this personal name, they'll think it's a movement.
    
    And that's what it is.  The End of the Curse of Colavito Movement.
    
    Anyone else is welcome to join in... B^)
    
    Joe
63.182NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Mon Jun 20 1994 13:2615
                                                              
    You're a class act, Joe.  While vultures like TCM interrupt their
    Simpson suicide watches to revel in another's personal misfortune,
    we still have such stand-up guys as yourself and Mike Childs (I 
    think; I'm awaiting that mail message-- I thought we had a deal on 
    that grotesque "jock" thing) to whom I don't mind losing a p-name bet.
    Fortunately, my fortunes weren't left in the hands of Hal, the Great 
    Stoneless One... ;-)
    
    Of course, there's always the risk that once you've got Red Sox fans
    doing this, a massive August/September choke and collapse are sure to
    follow.  But I'm not complaining!
    
    glenn
      
63.183still can't believe they swept em'CHIEFF::CHILDSTemptation is a GunMon Jun 20 1994 13:327
 well Glenn, I did ask to pick the pname of my choice but if it's too much
 for you when you see it you're welcome to use the 'jock' think except
 replace Morris with Maddux naturally.......

 ;^)      

63.184CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Mon Jun 20 1994 14:015
                                                              
|    You're a class act, Joe.  While vultures like TCM interrupt their
|    Simpson suicide watches to revel in another's personal misfortune,

I told you Huber was OK!
63.185Cleveland the Regurlar Season Superstars.. THEN GONEMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Jun 20 1994 14:308
    I dont think it matter's that much this year what the Indians do in
    the regular season.. If you look at cleveland as a whole you have the
    Cavs that cant get by Detroit, The Browns that cant be by Denver and
    now the Indians... Whats Clevelands tallies for Championships in the 
    last 25years (2 and 1/2 Decades, lets not drudge up things from before
    I was born :-)...)
    
    								MairB
63.186ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Jun 20 1994 14:3618
    
    Re .185
    
    Cleveland itself has one championship in the past 25 years - the
    '93-'94 Cleveland Crunch.
    
    NE Ohio has a few more - the Canton Invaders dominated the NPSL for
    the first 7 or so years of its existance.
    
    It should be pointed out that (1) the Indians have never lost a
    non WS playoff game, and (2) the Indians have a winning record in
    the WS (both in individual games and in series).  B^)
    
    It also should be pointed out that the Indians have won not one,
    but two World Series since the last time either Chicago team won
    one.  B^)
    
    Joe
63.187Regular Season has less importance this year in BaseballMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Jun 20 1994 14:4832
    NO Offense but who the hell cares about the Cleveland Cruch or the
    Canton Invaders or for that matter what they hell are they a Tittly
    Winks and Chess Team :-)
    
    I was only talking about the 4 real sports, you know the big leagues
    I dont care how many little league titles theyve won.
    
    Just seems to me (Of course I only watch Basketball/Football) that
    Cleveland seems to be better at choking in the big games then winning
    them... Since Im a youngin and have only watch Football/Basketball
    since the late 70's I cant recall a dominating team in either Football
    or basketball (Of course Im not one of those guys that reads/buys the
    Football/Basketball Digest/record books each year either).
    
    This year in baseball you need to go thru a few rounds of playoffs
    before the world series (YES ???) so the regular season has lost a
    little bit, this was the one thing that made the WS so exciting only
    2 of the best 4 teams had a shot at it... Hockey I consider the reg
    season as pre season, although with expansion I dont know the exact
    % of teams that make the playoffs but at one time it was 72+%....
    
    Not That Im a Bears fan but they won it all less then a decade ago,
    and we know what the bulls have done in the past decade.  Did the
    Indians win the WS in the past 25 years (Shows what I know :-)..) ?
    I watch baseball when Im at my Inlaws House (they dont miss a sox's
    game)... other then that I'll watch the world series...
    
    I just dont think you should be calling the Indians the best based on
    what they do in the regular season.. Look at Seattle in basketabll alot
    of good being the best in the regular season did for them :-)
    
    								MairB
63.188MSE1::FRANCUSNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsMon Jun 20 1994 15:494
    More like Joe is a wimp
    
    The Crazy Met
    
63.189DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameMon Jun 20 1994 16:305
    	Glenn, Glenn, Glenn...  You should know better than to bet anything
    on the Red Sox!  It would've been better to take the PawSox against
    the Charlotte Knights.
    
    				  /Don
63.190ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Jun 20 1994 16:3116
    
>    NO Offense but who the hell cares about the Cleveland Cruch or the
>    Canton Invaders or for that matter what they hell are they a Tittly
>    Winks and Chess Team :-)
    
    Soccer.
    
>    I just dont think you should be calling the Indians the best based on
>    what they do in the regular season...
    
    But I didn't; I just noted that they have the best record in the AL.
    In fact, I'm not at all convinced that they are the best team in the
    AL; I'd have to pick the White Sox, to be honest.  Baltimore's up
    there as well; the Indians, Yankees, and Blue Jays are a step behind...
    
    Joe
63.191Don't worry Joe, it's going back pronto...NAC::G_WAUGAMANClemens' Stats = Huge StrikezoneMon Jun 20 1994 16:5419
    
>    Glenn, Glenn, Glenn...  You should know better than to bet anything
>    on the Red Sox!  It would've been better to take the PawSox against
>    the Charlotte Knights.
    
    At this point, 11 in a row, only one loss away from the franchise
    record for a losing streak (it'd be a real shame if they won tonight
    and Butch didn't have his name and his name alone associated with 
    that record for posterity), I deserve... no, I *want* to suffer.  
    It's only right...
    
    And MikeC, as for your p-name above, it's so preposterous on the face
    of it that I'll proudly wear it as a paean to His Greatness.  One
    cannot help but read that p-name without applying the heaviest of
    sarcasm.  I'd stick a haughty "Ha!" at the end of it but I wouldn't
    want to violate the letter nor the spirit of the bet... ;-)
    
    glenn
     
63.192ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Mon Jun 20 1994 18:003
63.193but it looks so good...CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunMon Jun 20 1994 18:564
 that maybe Glenn but Mike JN and few others agree with me.......

 ;^)
63.194I'm goen to the closet......SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jun 21 1994 11:3421
    
    	The Tribe once again dominated the game from start to finish and
    beat the slumping Detroit Tigers in Detroit by a score of 7-1.  This
    makes 10 straight wins as the Indians remain the hotest baseball team
    in the Major Leagues.  
    	In last nights game, the Indians stold 6 bases.  Charles Nagy got
    the win.  Yes this team is hot and now hold a 4.5 game lead in the
    Central with the best record in the American League.  
    	What a deal, I really don't think I was ever this much into 
    baseball this late in the season.  Usually the season is already over
    by now.  The people back home are going crazy.  From what I heard the
    other day, the stadium is now sold out for their next home stand of
    11 games which is to start after this series.  If the Tribe sweeps
    Detroit....watch out....the city will be going crazy with the Indian
    fever.
    	
    	WaHoooooooooo!
    
    	The rookie Grimsley goes tonight.  
    
    		The Chief
63.195ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Jun 21 1994 12:3111
    
    Re .194
    
    Hal,
    
    Grimsley's not a rookie - he's young, but he first came up with the
    Phillies, walked as many as he struck out, and pitched just as poorly
    for the Indians last year.  He did pitch very well in AAA this year,
    though, and looks to have turned the corner.
    
    Joe
63.196CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 13:051
Hal, you better get a roll of Bounty, else you're gonna make a mess.....
63.197NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Tue Jun 21 1994 13:488
    
> Hal, you better get a roll of Bounty, else you're gonna make a mess.....
    
    At least he has the decency to keep going to the closet... ;-)
    
    
    glenn
    
63.198CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Jun 21 1994 14:035
    They better slow that bandwagon down some before it passes my house,
    an out of shape ex-soccer player could get hurt when trying to jump
    on that puppy...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
63.199Who says baseball's not exciting?NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Tue Jun 21 1994 14:146
    So, are the Indians going to break the Red Sox' 1988 record of 24
    straight wins at home?  P-name bet, Hal?  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
63.200;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jun 21 1994 15:271
    
63.201Did Heiser quit?HBAHBA::HAASAte a hot dog, made me feel goodTue Jun 21 1994 15:280
63.202Would like a piece of the action if Hal is willingAD::HEATHIndians in '94Tue Jun 21 1994 16:107
    
    
      Glen.....
    
       Hal aint got no guts to make a pname bet like that.
    
    Jerry
63.203On the war path...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jun 21 1994 17:3219
    
    	HaaaHaaa,
    		I'd really have to be a fool to accept a bet like that. 
    The possibility is there for sure and they will surely get the support
    from the fans but to win 6 more games straight is going to be tough to
    accomplish.  If any team can do it, it will be these up and comming
    Indians.
    		BTW, in my closet....I keep the broom!  One down and two
    to go....
    
    		SWOOSH.....
    
    
    		WaHoooooooo!
    
    	I wana go home!
    
    			The Chief
    
63.204CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 17:3815
>    	HaaaHaaa,
>    		I'd really have to be a fool to accept a bet like that. 
>    The possibility is there for sure and they will surely get the support
>    from the fans but to win 6 more games straight is going to be tough to
>    accomplish.  If any team can do it, it will be these up and comming
>    Indians.


HAHAHAHA yerself Hal.

You'll crow about your team in here, but when the hottest team in the
majors is on the line for something important, you start sandbaggin'
just like TCM.

I'm thinking that Hal is out-sandbagging TCM here.....
63.205ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Jun 21 1994 18:1913
    
    Saw,
    
> You'll crow about your team in here, but when the hottest team in the
> majors is on the line for something important, you start sandbaggin'
> just like TCM.
    
    Something important?  I didn't realize the record longest home
    winning streak was important.  A nice accomplishment, certainly,
    but how is one loss followed by 25 wins followed by one loss any
    better than one loss followed by 13 wins, 1 loss, and 12 more wins?
    
    Joe
63.206CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 18:2917
>    
>    Something important?  I didn't realize the record longest home
>    winning streak was important.  A nice accomplishment, certainly,
>    but how is one loss followed by 25 wins followed by one loss any
>    better than one loss followed by 13 wins, 1 loss, and 12 more wins?
>   


More sandbaggin.....


It goes to all the crowing about how great the Tribe is.  If they're
so great, they should easily be able to run that little streak out and
set the record.  


'Saw
63.207Let's see if the Indians, and Hal, are up to the taskNAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Tue Jun 21 1994 18:3712
> A nice accomplishment, certainly,
> but how is one loss followed by 25 wins followed by one loss any
> better than one loss followed by 13 wins, 1 loss, and 12 more wins?
  
    Okay, if the Tribe wins the 25 out of 26, Hal wins the bet.  The 1988
    Red Sox under General Joe Morgan were men enough to win 24 out of 25 
    (Clemens lost the game before the streak of 24 started, and lost the 
    game to end it, believe it or not...)
    
    glenn
    
63.208Give the Indians a breakBSS::MENDEZTue Jun 21 1994 18:447
    Isn't it interesting that the sox fans have to drag up an old
    meaningless record to try and hide the pitiful performance of the
    current red sox.  Its nice to see the Indians finally have a reason
    to be interested in baseball this late in June.  Whether the Indians
    swoon or not they did sweep the Sox over the weekend.
    
    BTW I am a fan of the "pitiful" A's.
63.209Now don't go spoiling our fun, Mr. Mendez... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Tue Jun 21 1994 18:481
    
63.210ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Jun 21 1994 18:5635
>>    Something important?  I didn't realize the record longest home
>>    winning streak was important.  A nice accomplishment, certainly,
>>    but how is one loss followed by 25 wins followed by one loss any
>>    better than one loss followed by 13 wins, 1 loss, and 12 more wins?

> More sandbaggin.....

    How in the world was I sandbagging?  I didn't voice _any_ opinion as
    to whether or not they can do it; I just questioned the importance
    of whether or not they do so.  To be honest, I think they _can_
    do it; they are on a great roll right now.  But if I was given the
    choice of a win to give them the streak and 2 losses later or a loss
    to end the streak and 2 wins later, I'd take the 2 wins.
    
> It goes to all the crowing about how great the Tribe is.  If they're
> so great, they should easily be able to run that little streak out and
> set the record.  
    
    Easily?  Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the '94 Indians
    are the best team ever.  (I'm not claiming this, and never have, BTW.)
    To be the best team ever, they'd have to win games at a something
    approaching a .750 clip; let's farther assume that this requires 
    winning 90% of their home games.  (I'm fairly certain no team has
    ever won 90% of its home games in MLB, or anywhere near that.)
    
    A team that wins 90% of its home games (going 73-8 at home) has a
    7.2% chance of managing a 25 game home winning streak.
    
    A team that wins 90% of its home games has a 48% chance of extending
    an 18 game home winning streak to 25 games.
    
    So even for a better team than baseball has ever seen, taking an
    18 game streak to 25 isn't easy.
    
    Joe
63.211CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 19:0444
Boy, you Tribe fans sure are a TESTY bunch!  Someone piss in yer cornflakes
this morning?


>    How in the world was I sandbagging?  

How about humor?  How 'bout "I was kidding you?"



|> It goes to all the crowing about how great the Tribe is.  If they're
|> so great, they should easily be able to run that little streak out and
|> set the record.  
|    
|    Easily?  Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the '94 Indians
|    are the best team ever.  (I'm not claiming this, and never have, BTW.)
|    To be the best team ever, they'd have to win games at a something
|    approaching a .750 clip; let's farther assume that this requires 
|    winning 90% of their home games.  (I'm fairly certain no team has
|    ever won 90% of its home games in MLB, or anywhere near that.)
|    
|    A team that wins 90% of its home games (going 73-8 at home) has a
|    7.2% chance of managing a 25 game home winning streak.
|    
|    A team that wins 90% of its home games has a 48% chance of extending
|    an 18 game home winning streak to 25 games.
|    
|    So even for a better team than baseball has ever seen, taking an
|    18 game streak to 25 isn't easy.
    



JEEZ, Joe, do you have to take the FUN out of EVERYTHING?  I was just
joshin' around (no offense Josh from Vancouver_eh) and you're throwin
all of these here dastisticks at me.....

I'm going to go get a soda because my mind is all boggled now......



[8^) in case you missed it!]

'Saw
63.212ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Jun 21 1994 19:1013
    
    Saw,
    
> Boy, you Tribe fans sure are a TESTY bunch!  Someone piss in yer cornflakes
> this morning?

    That's what happens when your team stays in the basement for 34
    straight years and then starts winning... B^)

    Sorry about the statistics; your note made me curious just how easy
    it might be, so I had to figure it through...
    
    Joe
63.213CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 19:1613
>
>    That's what happens when your team stays in the basement for 34
>    straight years and then starts winning... B^)

heh heh heh


>    Sorry about the statistics; your note made me curious just how easy
>    it might be, so I had to figure it through...
    
Well, I was fascinated by it all, but I didn't want to give you the
satisfaction after the spanking your bad boys gave the Red Sox this
past weekend....8^)
63.214Surprise they aren't celebrating their 75th AnniveWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Jun 21 1994 19:5412
    
    
       Joe.    Get a life!
    
    
          Joe get used to them Sox fans wanting to make bets and calling
    you a Sandbagger and all, they did the same thing to TCW when he was
    just rooting on his team. When you haven't won something for 76 years
    you gots to make up things to hide your own teams inadequacies.
    
    
    Chap
63.215btw, after further review, the Sox won 26 of 27 in 1988NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Tue Jun 21 1994 19:558
    In case anyone couldn't tell from my p-name, I am a bored-again Indians
    fan, and I hope they take the AL pennant after the Yankees suffer the
    embarrassment of losing to the wildcard team, or better yet the AL West
    champions...
    
    glenn
    
63.216WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Jun 21 1994 19:593
    
    
    Bandwagon Jumper!!!
63.217SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Jun 22 1994 11:2712
    
    	The winning streak ends at 10.  The Indians lost this game in the
    9th.  Up 5-1 going to the bottom of the 9th, the bullpen couldn't throw
    a strike.  Grimsley pitched a near perfect 8 innings but Shuey and
    Lindquist could hold the lead.  Another stolden base for Loften.  
    
    	Home streak still alive though.  Game today at 1pm.  Hopefully we
    can be updated in here...
    
    		WaHoooooooo!
    
    	The Chief
63.218CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunWed Jun 22 1994 12:5511
 I'm not surprised Glenn....

 ;^)


 Joe, the Celtics in the glory years of the 80 went 40-1 one year at home
 loosing only to Portland. That's ungodly .975 winning percentage. What's
 even more amazing is that they did it without any help from the refs....

 ;^)
63.219ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Wed Jun 22 1994 13:049
    
    Mike,
    
    Even a team that plays .975 at home would only have a 53% chance of
    putting together a 25 game streak.  Of course, no baseball team is
    going to play .975 at home (winning 79 games) unless the game of
    baseball goes through some terribly unlikely changes...
    
    Joe
63.220;^)CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunWed Jun 22 1994 13:146
 I just figured it was my duty to point out to you that some team somewhere
 had gone over 90% at home. Given it was the C's made it more enjoyable for
 sure. 

 mike
63.221CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunWed Jun 22 1994 13:144
 Did also mention how enjoayable it was to remind TCM about it?????

 ;^)
63.222CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 22 1994 13:2451
re Chappy:


	Man, you must've been beaten as a child. 8^)

	Red Sox fans don't look to hide the inadequacies of their team.
	We revel in it, we rejoice in it.  It's a given, like Tantalus
	reaching for the grapes which always receed from his touch, that
	the Championship will always be just out of reach.

	In that angst there is purity, a crucible as it were that burns
	away impurities of faux fans, and leaves behind a tempered, pure
	fan.

	It's easy to be a fan of a team that's won a lot of world series.
	It doesn't tax the mind, strain the heart, and raise a lot of
	questions in the Id.

	To be a fan of a truly bad team, like the Boston Braves, or the
	Washington Senators (first in the nation, last in the American
	League), is almost as easy, because oft times there's humor
	in the consecutive losses, the inept play, and the gimmicks
	they try to use to win.

	Ah, but to be a fan of a team that teases you, that beguiles
	you with its charm only to turn on you with the fangs of
	a Black Widow.....that takes a special breed.

	You know from the start the way it will go, you know from the
	moment the last note of the Star-Spangled Banner fades away
	on Opening Day that you'll be watching football in October
	and not the Red Sox sipping champagne.  Do we complain?
	Not so seriously.  Do we wail in ajbect misery?  No too much.

	The fact that it's been 76 years is not something we shrink
	from, that we hide or are ashamed of.  No, no, quite the
	opposite.   What you would so easily deride and make fun
	of we wear as a badge of honor...  What appears ignominious
	to you is glorious to us.

	For one day, perhaps when Glenn and I are old and grey, we
	will taste the nectar from the Promised Land.  We'll know
	the ultimate joy.   And that joy will be all the sweeter,
	and all the warmer for all the waiting....

	And in that moment, I'll actually feel sorry for the Yankee
	fans.  For no victory is so sweet as that tasted by one
	accustomed to defeat.........


'Saw
63.223WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Wed Jun 22 1994 15:193
    
    
       sniff sniff,
63.224CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 22 1994 15:367
>       sniff sniff,

Whatta you mean, sniff, sniff?   

I'm proud to be a Red Sox fan....  


63.225WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Wed Jun 22 1994 16:066
    
    
    You brought a tear to my eye.
    
    
    Chappy
63.226CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 22 1994 16:135
>    
>    You brought a tear to my eye.
>    
    
Oh, well, maybe Tito can get you a tissue.....8^)
63.227Wana play a HR game??? Lets do it!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jun 23 1994 11:2330
    
    	Another victory, another series win, another streak begins.  The
    Tribe beats Detroit with the long ball and takes the series 2-1 and
    begins another winning streak.  Dennis Martinez gets the win going
    6 1/3.  Thome hits two homers and Kenny Loften gets another stolden
    base.  
    	The Indians are off today and start a 11 game home stand playing
    New York on Friday.  With 19 straight home victorys, the Tribe needs
    to win its next 6 games to break the record.  Playing the second best
    team in the American League this weekend will be a good test for these
    hungry band of wild men.  
    	Loften and Belle are eating up the league this year.  They
    collected 5 hits in their win yesterday as they battle each other for
    the batting title.
    	Look for Cleveland to be Indian crazed for the next two weeks. 
    Fans will be comming out of the woodwork.  Just look around....the guy
    pumping gas...has an Indian hat on.  The guy at the bar with all those
    women on his arm....has an Indian hat on.  The boy playing catch with
    next door neighbor....both have signed Indian gloves.  The girl with
    the bikini over there.....has the Chief tatooed on her A$$.
    
    	Yes, this is a different team and a different city with people
    realizing the Indians with the Chief (Wahoo) is real and ready to
    contend....THIS YEAR!
    
    	Go Tribe!
    
    		WaHoooooooooooo!
    
    	The Chief
63.228We're not the Sox!!!!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Thu Jun 23 1994 12:2110
    
    
        Whatta ya say Hal or Joe. A little P-name bet that the Tribe Does
    not sweep? :-)
    
    
    Chappy
    
    
    
63.229ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Jun 23 1994 12:3810
    
    Chappy,
    
    I don't think the Tribe is likely to sweep; the Yankees are deep in
    lefthanders, who the Tribe has more trouble with.
    
    Watch out for Ramirez this weekend, though - he's eating lefties
    alive...
    
    Joe
63.230Streak will endOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Jun 23 1994 15:008
    Belle and Lofton battling each other for the batting title? They first
    have to catch Frank thomas and Paul O'Neill. I wouldn't be surprised
    if the Yankees came in and swept the series like they did in NY last
    month.
    
    Indians may miss facing Key. They should be able to light up
    Mulholland. Abbott is inconsistent.
    
63.231ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Jun 23 1994 16:4222
    
>    Belle and Lofton battling each other for the batting title? They first
>    have to catch Frank thomas and Paul O'Neill.
    
    Catching Paul O'Neill will take care of itself; he started the season
    playing way over his head, and is already coming back down to earth.
    
    Frank Thomas is another matter altogether; it's really scarry that,
    as incredible a year as Belle has had (if he stays on his current
    pace he'll have the best offensive year since a guy by the name of
    Ted Williams), Frank Thomas still has a .075 SLG lead and .046 OBP
    lead.
    
>    I wouldn't be surprised if the Yankees came in and swept the series
>    like they did in NY last month.
    
    I would be very surprised if they did; that's a pname bet I'd take
    any day.  The Indians have played much better at home, are hot, have
    a fifth starter now, and won't be playing against the park by having
    their righties in the lineup.
    
    Joe
63.232Of course it's Jeff "Big Loo" Bagwell in the NL...NAC::G_WAUGAMANValdera-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-haThu Jun 23 1994 18:1213
    
>    Frank Thomas is another matter altogether; it's really scarry that,
>    as incredible a year as Belle has had (if he stays on his current
>    pace he'll have the best offensive year since a guy by the name of
>    Ted Williams), Frank Thomas still has a .075 SLG lead and .046 OBP
>    lead.
    
    For as much attention (deserved) as Griffey's getting for the HRs,
    forget about him being the biggest offensive force in baseball, Frank
    Thomas is once again the man, and it's not even close...
    
    glenn
    
63.233ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Jun 23 1994 18:4216
    
    Re .232
    
>     <<< Note 63.232 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN "Valdera-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha" >>>
    
    Did the week end when I wasn't looking?  B^)
    
>    For as much attention (deserved) as Griffey's getting for the HRs,
>    forget about him being the biggest offensive force in baseball, Frank
>    Thomas is once again the man, and it's not even close...
    
    Of course, Griffey's season is _all_ the HRs.  Belle is only .047
    behind Griffey in SLG, and more than makes up for that by being
    .052 ahead in OBP.
    
    Joe
63.234Trader Lou RoooooooooooooolsAD::HEATHIndians in '94Thu Jun 23 1994 19:208
    
    
    Glen....
    
      Who is this Jeff Bagwell guy?  Sox fans keep bringing him up and a
    mistake was made by mangement.  This couldn't be true.  I refuse to
    believe that guy in Houston was ever in the Red Sox organization, 
    no way.  :*)
63.235ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Jun 27 1994 13:029
    
    Oh well...
    
    I saw nothing of the games this weekend, but 2 were played, and 2 were
    lost.  Had to happen sometime, I guess...
    
    Time to start a new winning streak, I guess... B^)
    
    Joe
63.236METSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsMon Jun 27 1994 14:504
yabbut where is Hal????

The Crazy Met

63.237Not hard to predictOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Mon Jun 27 1994 15:4418
    As expected.
    
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.230                     CLEVELAND INDIANS                     230 of 236
OPTION::LAZARUS "David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353"         8 lines  23-JUN-1994 11:00
                              -< Streak will end >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Belle and Lofton battling each other for the batting title? They first
    have to catch Frank thomas and Paul O'Neill. I wouldn't be surprised
    if the Yankees came in and swept the series like they did in NY last
    month.
    
    Indians may miss facing Key. They should be able to light up
    Mulholland. Abbott is inconsistent.
    
    
63.238ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Jun 27 1994 16:2412
    
    OK, so it was a good call (though only playing 2 games certainly made
    the task easier).  If they hadn't put Shuey out there in the 8th
    yesterday, the Tribe might have even won one.
    
    A disappointing weekend, yes.  The end for the Tribe, no (though
    probably the end for now for Shuey, and Morris seems to be back to
    throwing batting practive).
    
    Still enjoying this season,
    
    Joe
63.239Ball 4.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Jun 27 1994 16:4614
    
    	Both loses this weekend were caused by poor pitching.  Yesterday
    Morris had 6 walks and the Friday extended game I think we had another
    5 or 6 walks.....you can't win games by giving them runners that they
    don't deserve.  
    	Must have been a hell of a game yesterday though.....12-11.  Thats
    the way you like it....lots of runs....
    	Belle hit two homers over this last weekend with the one yesterday
    being a 3 run shot.
    	Baltimore tonight.....should be another tough series.
    
    	WaHoooooooo!
    
    		The Chief
63.240WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Jun 28 1994 13:0310
    
    
        :-)
    
           Indians can't play with the AL East.
    
    Yanks 6-0 against the Tribe this year!
    
    
    Chappy
63.241another lossSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jun 28 1994 15:4410
    
    	Hey, Hey, Hey...
    
    	None of this now.
    
    
    	WaHoooooo
    
    		The Chief
    
63.242ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Jun 28 1994 16:2015
    
    Re .240
    
    Chappy,
    
    Isn't that 4-0?  If I remember correctly, the Indians only played
    two in NY, and they just played two in Cleveland.
    
    And they can play with the AL East - they've done fine going up
    against Detroit, Boston, and Toronto, and haven't played Baltimore
    enough to matter yet.
    
    It's just the mighty Wade Boggs that gives 'em fits... B^)
    
    Joe
63.243WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Jun 28 1994 17:369
    
    
    
        Your probably right Joe, thats what I thought too but I could of
    swore I saw 6-0 on that screen???
    
    
    
    Chap
63.2446-0 it isOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Jun 30 1994 03:571
    Yanks swept 4 from Tribe in NY so they are 6-0.
63.245Another 1 run game...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jun 30 1994 11:1513
    
    	The tribe is on a bad streak....loosing in the last inning.  This
    makes two of three games lost in the last inning.  They did however 
    win game two in the last but it shouldn't have even gotten to that
    point.  The relief pitching may be in trouble...Shuey was just placed
    on the Dis list the other day.  Let hope the Indians can pull this 
    game out tonight and split the series with Baltimore.  The Twins come
    to town over the weekend and this will even be another good series.
    Nothing comes easy for the Tribe.
    
    		WaHooooooooooooo
    
    	The Chief
63.246No need for the pen...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jul 05 1994 11:1718
    
    	The Tribe is on the WAR path again...now winning 5 straight and 6
    of their last 7.  No need for the bull pin lately with the pitching
    staff starters completing 4 of the last 5 games.
    	The Indians picked up pitcher Jeff Russell from the Red Sox.  Can
    see nothing but good out of this trade.  Thanks very much!
    	Albert Belle is terring up the league the last week hitting 4 HR's
    and ready to take the batting title lead being just a few points off
    the pace.  Kenny Loften has moved into 3rd place just behind Belle.
    Hmmm, who was saying there was no way these two guys would challenge?
    	On the road to Texas today.....hope the good pitching and great
    hitting keeps up!
    
    
    		WaHooooooooooooo!
    		
    	The Chief
    
63.247CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jul 05 1994 13:096
>    	The Indians picked up pitcher Jeff Russell from the Red Sox.  Can
>    see nothing but good out of this trade.  Thanks very much!


Yeah, if you like cancer.....

63.248We'll take him.....]SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jul 05 1994 13:2225
    
    	The cancer was that known as the Red Sox Blues!!!  With the Tribe,
    	different chemistry, a real team and something more than hearing
    	everyone moan.....Russell will prove to be more of a gain than a
    	loss.  I don't think Russell has even pitched yet for the Indians.
    	The way I see it.....Russell will can only make this Indian team
    	better.  With Shuey out for 15 days DL, Russell will be this teams
    	closer for awhile.  Honestly, I hope he doesn't see much work.
    
    	Good job Cleveland front office! 
    
    	This trade will go down like the others....take a chance and give a
    	player a good team, good coaches and run potential....they will go
    	far....ie:  Morris.....Martinez.....Russell.....
    
    	With Albert, Kenny, Carlos, Eddie and the rest of the crew, you 
    	can't go wrong.
    
    	What did the tribe outscore the Twins by this weekend....something
    	like 32-12.
    
    		WaHooooooooo!
    
    	The Chief
     
63.249ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Jul 05 1994 13:2316
    
    You never know, Russell might pull a Jack Morris and (1) pitch well
    while (2) being positive.  At least that's what I'm hoping happens.
    
    Hal - the bad thing that can come out of the trade is Nabholz regaining
    his 91-93 form while Russell continues to blow up.  Farr's no loss
    even if he does come back, really, but Nabholz could be.
    
    Nice to see the Indians push the Twins farther back - it's worth
    noting that the Twins and Indians finish their season series this
    weekend.  Cleveland's won 7 of 9 so far.
    
    1st place on the 4th of July.  If the Tribe can stay ahead of just
    one of NY/Baltimore/Chicago, they should make the playoffs... B^)
    
    Joe
63.250CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jul 05 1994 13:3110
    
    
    	Yabbut on Saturday, double eue eee eee aye talk radion was doing a
    wonderful "glad yer outa here" thang on Russell.  So were the callers.
    The guy was a Class "A" malcontent (so they said).
    
    I remain,
    keeping my POPB outa thisted
    Kev
    
63.251HAL, wake up and smell Lake Erie...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue Jul 05 1994 13:389
|    	Yabbut on Saturday, double eue eee eee aye talk radion was doing |a
|    wonderful "glad yer outa here" thang on Russell.  So were the callers.
|    The guy was a Class "A" malcontent (so they said).

Yabut they've said that about him on every stop he's made in his career.  HAL,
just hope tha the can pitch, because it is almost guaranteed that he will be
a bad influence.

=Bob=
63.252CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Tue Jul 05 1994 14:1611
Russell was a classic case that was similar to a Project leader we had
in my group who fortunately is not with the company any longer.  (He knew
he was layoff meat).

His modus operandi was to blame everything that went wrong because of his
own ineptitude on everyone else.  It destroyed morale and basically sucked...

Russell was the same way.....


'Saw
63.253It really can't hurt.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jul 05 1994 17:0718
    
    	I really don't think the rest of the Tribe will let Russell do
    anything to upset the chemistry of this team.  It will be hard for him
    to do with him not knowing really anyone else on the team.  I think he
    will have to prove himself to the Indians first before he can do any
    damage.  Do you really think he will be there next year???  I don't. 
    He is here to do what he can untill Shuey comes back and to give Mesa
    some rest every now and again.
    
    	YES!  1st Place at the All Star break I can honestly say I've
    never seen before.  Ahhhhhhh, this is nice!
    
    
    	Go Tribe!
    
    		WaHooooooooooooooo!
    
    	The Chief
63.254Can't wait to see the Tribe in BostonAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneTue Jul 05 1994 17:2610
    
    
     
     Chief
    
      I'm sure all the A's thought the same thing.  You'd be surprised how
    fast a cancer can spread when you don't pitch when given the ball.  IE
    my tummy hurts, gotta hangnail, the moon is full......
    
    Jerry
63.255WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Jul 05 1994 17:429
    
    
           What does everyone who leaves Boston via trade or being released
    a trouble maker?
    
    
    
    
    Chap
63.256CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue Jul 05 1994 17:568
    
|           What does everyone who leaves Boston via trade or being released
|    a trouble maker?
 
Assuming you mean "Why..."

Uhh, other players have left Boston besides Russell and Boggs.

63.257MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jul 05 1994 17:592
    
      Bruce Hurst wasn't a "troublemaker". Quite the opposite.
63.258WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Jul 05 1994 18:419
    
    
    
       Boggs, Plantier, Fisk (The 1st year he left I heard this) Burks,
    (clemens mentioned it),now Russell?
    
    
    
    Chap
63.259CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue Jul 05 1994 18:441
Hurst, Boddiker, Anderson, Bagwell, Quantrill, Hatcher, Valle...
63.260CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jul 05 1994 18:492
    Perry, Casey, Wickford, Hamilton, Thornton, Howard......
    
63.261CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Tue Jul 05 1994 18:491
I don't remember Eckersley being tagged as a trouble maker either.....
63.262GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR..........WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Jul 05 1994 18:575
    
    
         O.K not everyone. :-)
    
     
63.263HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Tue Jul 05 1994 19:143
    Bagwell wasn't a RedSox yet.
    
    Add Oil Can Boyd to the list...
63.264Too bad, I liked Dennis.SALEM::DODAWorkin' on mysteries without any cluesTue Jul 05 1994 19:346
Can says he can still pitch, yet, even with the sad state of 
pitching in baseball today (Can you say Dave Righetti?), no one 
wants him. Either he's lyin' or the Sox just may have been right 
this one time.

daryll
63.265HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Tue Jul 05 1994 19:362
    Not when he was traded...
    
63.266SALEM::DODAWorkin' on mysteries without any cluesTue Jul 05 1994 19:411
True.
63.267Always playing it both ways, these NYers...NAC::G_WAUGAMANR-r-r-r-roberto Baggio!Wed Jul 06 1994 17:118
    
    Give it up, Chap.  Two weeks ago you yourself would have gladly labeled
    Russell the cancer of the century (as you did with Boggs when he was on
    the Sox).  The notes in here attesting to Russell's attitude were
    piling up at a record pace *before* the trade...
    
    glenn
    
63.268WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Wed Jul 06 1994 17:1810
    
    
        I loved Russell playing for the Sox? He was one of the opposing
    teams best players?
    
         And for the 93rd time "READ MY LIPS" I still hate Boggs and I
    always will!
    
    
    Chap
63.269Jacobs > FenwayTNPUBS::ALVEYDrive-by body-piercingWed Jul 06 1994 19:1922
    Madea road trip to Cleveland with my son coupla
    weeks ago to visit my Dad and check out Jacobs
    Field.  Nice park, clean, spacious, everything, in fact,
    that Fenway ain't.  Great sound system - the place rocks
    when Omar Vizguel comes to the plate.  They sell beer
    throughout the game (Sam Adams, even!) Easy downtown access,
    easy egress after the game to the east, south, and west.
    We has seats on third base line, so my son was excited about
    getting Sox autographs.  But the Tribe sit there, they make
    the visitors stare into the sun from the first base line.
    Worked out well, though, 'cuz none of the Sox even peeked
    out of the dugout, while Baerga, Lofton, Pena, and Eddie Murray
    were signing anything that was offered.  One exception -
    Kenny Lofton with wraparound shades and game face firmly
    in place stared down my son and his Red Sox regalia and skipped
    to the next kid.
    All in all, a fun place to go and a fun team to watch.
    I hope they can survive the addition of Russell.
    Then again Jack Morris isn't exactly Mr Chemistry either.
    
    dr.a
    
63.270CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Wed Jul 06 1994 19:448
>                              -< Jacobs > Fenway >-


Well, considering they had the best of the past 80 years to choose from.

I saw the park on TV the other night and it looks nice.   

But it doesn't have any ghosts yet.....
63.271lost 2 of 3 to TexasSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jul 08 1994 14:3621
    
    	Russell pitched 1 inning the other night.......
    
    
    		stats
    
    		INNINGS PITCHED: 1
    		HITS:  0
    		RUNS:  0
    		EARNED RUNS:  0
    		WALKS:  0
    		STRIKE OUTS:  2
    
    
    	Good Job Jeff!
    
    
    		WaHoooooooooo!
    
    	The Chief
    
63.272Russell may have the mental edge backAKOCOA::BREENFri Jul 08 1994 14:559
    Ironically form wise Russell seemed to have come around just before the
    trade.  I managed to catch him vs Toronto and he looked very sharp.
    
    Unfortunately pitching is very much a mental thing and there he had
    probably lost it with his approach to Duke's activities.  Some players
    let things like chemistry bother them, some don't.  It's the type of
    thing a millionaire athelete might have a problem with but a guy in
    1953 making 8700 and knowing there's a dozen guys who want his job
    doesn't necessarily care about.
63.273garbage time, he shines.SALEM::DODAWorkin' on mysteries without any cluesFri Jul 08 1994 15:383
Game wasn't on the line was it?

daryll
63.274still goodSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSFri Jul 08 1994 16:5911
    
    	No, the game wasn't on the line.  The Tribe was leading 13-4 in the
    	ninth.  Just a confidence builder.  But, since first writing today,
    	another guy just told me that he lost a game for the
    	tribe...when??  Last night?  The Indians lost 6-4 but I haven't
    	seen a box score yet....anyone???
    
    		WaHooooooooo!
    
    		The Chief
    
63.275CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 17:0714
>    
>    	No, the game wasn't on the line.  The Tribe was leading 13-4 in the
>    	ninth.  Just a confidence builder.  But, since first writing today,
>    	another guy just told me that he lost a game for the
>    	tribe...when??  Last night?  The Indians lost 6-4 but I haven't
>    	seen a box score yet....anyone???
>    

I don't know about him losing a game, but it is vintage Russell to
do it when there's nothing at stake.

Put him in a tight situation and he breaks down like an old car.....
    

63.276WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Fri Jul 08 1994 19:218
    
    
        Yeah and Ryan did a great job last night huh?
    
    
    
    
    Chap
63.277SALEM::DODAWorkin' on mysteries without any cluesFri Jul 08 1994 19:3912
Nope he got hammered, but you already know that.

Did Ryan chalk it up to "lack of chemistry" afterwards?

Geez, Quantrill must be walking around like he's the 2nd coming 
right now the way that Russell (Is that your ERA or area code?) 
makes him out to be the vital cog in the sox drive to 
contention. 

Puh-lease.

daryll
63.278Russell plays againSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Jul 11 1994 11:2644
    
    	Russell pitched in two games over the weekend.....
    
    	In a 4-3 victory on Saturday, Russell got his 12th or 13th save
    	by pitching the last inning.....
    
    		1 inning
    		0 hits
    		0 runs
    		0 earn runs
    		0 walks
    		0 strikeouts
    
    	In a 9-1 victory over the Twins on Sunday, Russell pitched the
    	last inning...
    
    		1 inning
    		0 hits
    		0 runs
    		0 earn runs
    		0 walks
    		0 strikeouts.
    
    	Total with the Indians, Russell has given up no hits!
    
    		3 innings
    		0 hits
    		0 runs
    		0 earn runs
    		0 walks
    		2 strikeouts
    		1 save
    		0 wins
    		0 loses
    
    	Great Job!
    		Keep up the good work and keep saving those games!
    
    
    		WaHooooooooooo!
    
    	The Chief
    
    
63.279TRIBE ON THE LOOSE SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Jul 11 1994 11:3964
    
    	At the All-star break....
    
    		THE CLEVELAND INDIANS ARE IN FIRST PLACE!
    
    		THE CLEVELAND INDIANS ARE THE BEST TEAM IN THE 
    			AMERICAN LEAGUE!
    
    		THE CLEVELAND INDIANS HAVE THE BEST HITTING CLUB 
    			IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE!
    
    		THE CLEVELAND INDIANS HAVE THE 5TH BEST PITCHING CLUB
    			IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE!
    
    		THE CLEVELAND INDIANS HAVE THE BEST HOME RECORD IN THE
    			MAJORS!
    
    		ALBERT BELLE AND KENNY LOFTEN ARE JUST PERCENTAGE POINTS
    			AWAY OF HAVING THE BEST BATTING AVERAGE IN THE
    			AMERICAN LEAGUE!
    	
    		KENNY LOFTEN HAS STOLDEN MORE BASES THAN ANYONE IN THE
    			MAJOR LEAGUE!
    
    		KENNY LOFTEN HAS THE MOST HITS IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE!
    
    		ALBERT BELLE HAS THE 3RD MOST HITS IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE!
    
    		ALBERT BELLE IS IN THE TOP 3 IN DOUBLES!
    
    		KENNY LOFTEN IS IN THE TOP 3 IN TRIPLES!
    
    		ALBERT BELLE IS IN THE TOP 3 IN HOMERUNS!
    
    		AND THE LIST COULD GO ON AND ON AND ON............
    
    
    	This is the best Indian team that I have ever seen in my short life
    	and boy is it nice seeing it happen.  The Tribe has just barely
    	held on to 1st place with the White Sox comming on strong.  
    
    	Going to the All-star game on Tuesday....
    
    			*ALBERT BELLE*
    			*KENNY LOFTEN*
    			*CARLOS BIERGA*
    			*SANDY ALOMAR JR.*
    			
    		Guys that should be on the list.....
    
    
    			*MARK CLARK*
    			*EDDIE MURRAY*
    			*VASQUELL*
    
    	Should be an interesting All-star game tomorrow.  I'll watch this
    	game only because of the amount of Indian stars on the team and...
    	I'd like to see Albert smack a HR, Kenny steal a base and to hear
    	what everyone has to say about the TRIBE!
    
    
    		WaHooooooooooo!
    
    		The Chief
63.280ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Mon Jul 11 1994 11:544
63.281Well, they should be there.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Jul 11 1994 13:098
    
    	Are you sure about that???  I thought they were alternates...
    
    
    	WaHooooooooooooo
    
    		The Chief
    
63.282CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Mon Jul 11 1994 13:113
When Russell is in a pressure situation, when the games really matter,
you'll see.  And then watch him spread the blame around like someone
spreading margerine on a TV commercial......
63.283And it's LoftOn...HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Mon Jul 11 1994 13:166
    >		ALBERT BELLE AND KENNY LOFTEN ARE JUST PERCENTAGE POINTS
    >			AWAY OF HAVING THE BEST BATTING AVERAGE IN THE
    >			AMERICAN LEAGUE!
    
    Who isn't?
    
63.284ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Jul 11 1994 14:2324
    
    Belle and Lofton are having truly had amazing seasons so far.  If it
    weren't for the superhuman year Thomas is having with the bat, Belle
    would be my pick for MVP (yes, over Griffey), and Lofton would be
    my fourth choice.
    
    7 of the Tribe's starting 9 are now in double digits in home runs -
    Lofton, Baerga, Belle, Murray, Thome, Alomar, and Ramirez.  Sorrento
    will make it also - somehow I don't think Vizquel will, though...
    
    The one player the Indians could most afford to lose to injury:
    Eddie Murray.
    
    The one player the Indians can least afford to lose to injury:
    Charles Nagy.
    
    Charlotte (AAA) is in first place; Canton-Akron (AA) is lagging
    behind though.
    
    And the Columbus and Kinston teams have some serious prospects.
    
    Wahoo indeed!
    
    Joe
63.285ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Jul 12 1994 12:1923
    
    Was listening to some random call-in sports show last night, when
    the topic of 1st half awards came up.  (My picks: MVP - Thomas,
    Cy Young - Cone, ROY - Ramirez, MOY - Hargrove.)  Their picks were
    largely the same, and mostly irrelevant, until they came to Hargrove.
    After praising him for the job he's done, the announcer said
    something to the effect of "of course, re-alignment has really
    helped Cleveland" to which the caller replied something to the effect
    of "yeah, if they were still in the AL East they'd probably be about
    4 games back."
    
    Huh?  Can someone explain this?  With the same schedule they would
    have had without realignment, Cleveland has a 1.5 game lead on NY.
    In either the East or central, the Tribe would have had teams
    breathing down its neck (NYY & BAL or CHW, KCR, and MIN).  How can
    it be said that realignment _has_ helped them?
    
    Of course, _will_ help them is another matter; instead of trying to
    stay ahead of NYY and BAL, they just need remain in front of 1 of the
    3 teams chasing them.  But why would anyone expect the Indians to be
    46-39 instead of 51-33 just because of realignment?
    
    Joe
63.286Doesn't make any senceSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jul 12 1994 19:009
    
    	Jake must have been on the other end of the phone call.......
    
    
    
    		WaHoooooooooooooo!
    
    	The Chief
    
63.287Lets see who's best now...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSThu Jul 14 1994 11:1612
    
    	Big series starts today and won't end untill next weekend is over.
    	In the next 11 games, the Tribe plays the White Sox 8 times. 
    	Should be very interesting.  Nagy goes tonight in Chicago.  4 games
    	in Chicago this weekend and 4 games in Cleveland next weekend.
    
    	Hope Albert gets back on track tonight...he has been in sort of a 
    	slump as of late.  Something like 2 or 3 games without a hit.
    
    		WaHooooooooooooo
    
    	The Chief
63.288MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jul 15 1994 21:086
    And here I thought Hal might have turned a page; Indians lose a big
    game after leading 3-0 nary a sign. Joe could be on vacation, yeah
    that's it.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
63.289Central Division LeadersSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Jul 18 1994 11:1421
    
    	The Indians split the series with the White Sox and remain in 1st.
    
    	On Friday, Jeff Russell picked up another save as the big closer.
    
    		2/3 Inning
    		1 Hit
    		O Runs
    		0 Earn Runs
    		0 Walks
    		0 Strike Outs
    
    		ERA with the Tribe = 0.00
    		2 saves
    
    	Keep it up!
    
    
    		WaHoooooooooooo!
    
    	The Chief
63.290TC* watch, Day 1SOLANA::MAY_BRone bourbon,one scotch, and one beerMon Jul 18 1994 16:032
    
    And where is TC*?
63.291MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Mon Jul 18 1994 16:475
    Huh, why in the world would I have to show up here? Enjoy Brews, I'm
    outta here for a week.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
63.292DZIGN::ROBICHAUDThe Wind Cries MaryMon Jul 18 1994 16:514
    	So what is Belle's average now that he's not using a corked
    bat?  Those Indian players aren't very good at B&E.
    
    				   /Don
63.293Albert Belle's bat...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Jul 18 1994 17:066
    
    	Yea, I heard something about his bat being conficated over the 
    	weekend.....
    
    	The Chief
    
63.294HANNAH::ASHEGonna bang some heads...Mon Jul 18 1994 20:242
    Confiscated and then switched a time or two...
    
63.29510 days out of workSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jul 19 1994 11:2524
    
    	From what I heard on the TV last night.....they took his bat over
    	the weekend and placed it in some umpires office.  Over night
    	someone broke in through the roof and stold it.  A different bat
    	at put in its place...the next night, the original bat (suposably)
    	was put back.  The bat was x-rayed and found to be loaded with
    	cork.
    
    	Question is:  How does this help his batting?  Does anyone know?
    
    	The Tribe lost last night 6-5 to Texas.  Don't know how the game
    	was lost seeing that the Indians were up 5-3 then tied 5-5 in the
    	seventh.
    
    	Farr, who was traded to the Red Sox said he could believe that the
    	bat of Belle's was corked.  He said that at one practice, someones
    	bat broke and the insides came out.  May not have been Belle's
    	though.  Who knows...  How many guys in the big leagues use corked
    	bats???
    
    		WaHoooooooooo
    
    	The Chief
    
63.296CAMONE::WAYCome to Butt-headTue Jul 19 1994 13:1420
Well, I don't know the physics of it all, but a corked bat will be lighter,
giving you more bat speed.   There's got to be a limit to how light a
big bat can be (ie, if it's 34", it cannot physically weigh under a certain
amount, because of the amount of wood it must contain).  If you cork it,
you get the same dimensions, with much less weight.

Frank Howard used to start out with a 34oz bat, go to a 33oz, and by
the end of the season was way down under 30oz.  The fatigue of a season
makes it harder to get around with a heavier bat.

Then too, I wonder if changing the structure of the bat from a solid to 
what is effectively a cylinder filled with a lighter material might give
more "pop" to the ball as it comes off the bat.


This is all speculation.  If I knew all about it, I wouldn't be sitting
here, I'd be one of baseball's best hitter (illegaly, like Belle)....


'Saw
63.297Wow, is this dumb...NAC::G_WAUGAMANIl Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo!Tue Jul 19 1994 13:3110
    Either Belle or whoever is responsible for this has to win baseball's
    Big Dummy of the Year Award (no mean feat there).  Albert Belle needs a
    corked bat like Nolan Ryan needed a knuckleball.  Seriously, there's a
    very marginal benefit to using one (physics-wise).  If the Indians
    slump over those 10 games, heads could roll.  As it is, for what is
    considered a major cheating offense, he got the minimum penalty...
    
    glenn
    
63.298just like the airportSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jul 19 1994 16:597
    
    	If this is as big a deal as its made out to be....why not have 
    	x-ray machines at every stadium and require all bats to go through
    	it prior to the game with an ump as witness?
    
    		The Chief
    
63.299;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jul 19 1994 17:1915
    
    
    	Yabbut doncha know that the x-ray rays cause a fracture in the
    chrystalline lattice structure and make several pockets of high
    dislocation densitty??????   Ya know what happens when a 90 mph
    fastball comes in contact with one of those sites???  Believe me, it's
    not a pretty sight.
    
    	Besides, isn't x-raying baseball bats without a warrent in
    violation of the 4th amendment or somthin??????
    
    
    I remain,
    Kev_for Perry_Mason_and_Fermi
    
63.300One of the most bizarre episodes I've ever heard of...NAC::G_WAUGAMANIl Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo!Tue Jul 19 1994 17:2210
>    	If this is as big a deal as its made out to be....why not have 
>    	x-ray machines at every stadium and require all bats to go through
>    	it prior to the game with an ump as witness?
    
    Because everyone's not a cheat, requiring hired moles to work the stadium 
    infrastructure on espionage duty...
    
    glenn
    
63.301rats! How'd I miss that????? :*(CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jul 19 1994 17:391
    
63.302Upset of the year in sprotsAKOCOA::BREENTue Jul 19 1994 18:114
                          <<< Note 63.301 by CSTEAM::FARLEY >>>
                        -< rats!  How'd I miss that?????  :*( >-
    
    
63.303WaHoooooooooooooooooo!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Jul 19 1994 19:416
    
    	If you think that ole Albert is the only one in the Majors that
    	use the cork.........I remain mistaken.
    
    	The Chief
    
63.304DZIGN::ROBICHAUDB.Arnold,R.Nixon,A.BelleTue Jul 19 1994 20:152
    
    
63.305Free Albert!NAC::G_WAUGAMANIl Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo!Tue Jul 19 1994 20:2111
>    	If you think that ole Albert is the only one in the Majors that
>    	use the cork.........I remain mistaken.
    
    Well, okay, Hal, everyone but Albert should be suspended, because he
    was the only one honest enough to admit to having sent the clubhouse 
    boy through the stadium duct work to break into the umpire's locker
    room...
    
    glenn
    
63.306HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jul 19 1994 20:309
  Just out of curiosity, what would you think would be the minimum number
of people both in and out of the Indian's organization that would have been
likely to know about Albert's bat being corked? 

  Somehow I doubt he did it himself in his basement.

  Do you suppose the umpire spotted it himself or was he tipped off?

  George
63.307PTOVAX::JACOBTue Jul 19 1994 20:384
    Twas "suggested" to the Umps by White Sox Mgr. Gene Lamont.
    
    JaKe
    
63.308Who's got the bat?SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSWed Jul 20 1994 11:3747
    
    	No doubt that durring the All-star game, someone asked him about it
    	and then it was brought to the attention of the White Sox.  Big
    	series between the teams and they thought they needed all the help
    	they could get.  Too bad they only won a split.  
    
    	Strange thing I heard on the radio on the way into work is that
    	after the bat was taken from the umps office.  An Indians official
    	returned it.  Now, how do we know this is the real bat?  Why even
    	return it at all?  I also read in the paper yesterday that Albert
    	said he is innocent of all charges and will prove it in his
    	hearing.  Also, the company that sells the bats said that they do
    	make these kinds of bats but do not sell them to the major
    	leaguers.
    
    	I think the team can still win without Albert for 10 games just
    	because of the great hitters on the team.  The Tribe will have no
    	trouble filling in for him in the field.
    
    	On a side note.....The Tribe beat the Texas Rangers yesterday 13-3.
    	Belle hit his 27th home run...was the bat corked???  Did see
    	several signs at the stadium...couldn't read them
    	though...something like 'Belle corked'.  Jeff Russell pitched the
    	last inning.....
    
    			1 Inning
    			2 Hits
    			0 Runs
    			0 Earn Runs
    			0 Walks
    			1 Strike out
    
    			No save....
    
    	What a job this Russell fellow has done for the Tribe.  Just don't
    	understand why the Red Sox let him go...must have something to do
    	with the team chemistry.  What do ya think?  
    
    	Indians still have something to play for in the middle of July.
    	Red Sox still looking forward to Patriot season.  8-)
    
    
    		WaHooooooooooooo
    
    	The Chief
    
    
63.309CAMONE::WAYCome to Butt-headWed Jul 20 1994 12:5019
>    
>    	What a job this Russell fellow has done for the Tribe.  Just don't
>    	understand why the Red Sox let him go...must have something to do
>    	with the team chemistry.  What do ya think?  
>    


Hal, 

You can print all the Russell stats you want, till you're blue in the
face, but why don't you just save it all up and wait until something
IMPORTANT comes along. 

Those are the ones that Russell blows.  He can close all he wants
in a situation where he won't get a save, and what does it matter?


'Saw

63.310Man, is he setting himself up...NAC::G_WAUGAMANIl Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo!Wed Jul 20 1994 13:3721
                                                       
>    	What a job this Russell fellow has done for the Tribe.  Just don't
>    	understand why the Red Sox let him go...must have something to do
>    	with the team chemistry.  What do ya think?  
    
    I think you're heading for a big and painful fall, pal.  Any reasonably
    sane Indians fan (like Joe Huber) should have a bit more trepidation
    and humility than to be pushing all his chips across the table on this
    turd.  After all his yapping about Red Sox "cancers", our friend Chappy 
    learned the hard way, and very quickly, about Russell's chemistry lab 
    partner in crime, Greg Harris.  Your turn awaits, my friend... ;-)
    
    Fact of it is, I'm quite happy to have gotten Chris Nabholz for
    Russell, as I've always liked Nabholz (commended the Indians for
    picking him up in the first place), and if he rebounds from some 
    elbow problems he can be a very nice young lefthanded starter.  
    Thanks for the Nabholz two-hitter the other night, Chief.  Lemme 
    know the next time Jack Morris throws one a those...
    
    glenn
    
63.311TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinWed Jul 20 1994 13:5525
    	Chainsaw sez:
    
>Well, I don't know the physics of it all, but a corked bat will be lighter,
>giving you more bat speed.   There's got to be a limit to how light a
>big bat can be (ie, if it's 34", it cannot physically weigh under a certain
>amount, because of the amount of wood it must contain).  If you cork it,
>you get the same dimensions, with much less weight.

>Then too, I wonder if changing the structure of the bat from a solid to 
>what is effectively a cylinder filled with a lighter material might give
>more "pop" to the ball as it comes off the bat.

    The was an article in today's Worcester T&G about the advantages of
    'corking' a bat. Including the points 'Saw makes above, after the
    cork is inserted into the bat it expands. The expanded cork exerts
    pressure on the surrounding wood, making the wood more dense and thus 
    giving the ball a little more pop off the bat.
    
    The expert in the article (from Louisville Slugger) said cork will give
    you about an extra 10 feet on a fly ball. The goal is to turn 370 foot
    fly-outs into 380 'cheap' homeruns. Its not going to make a weak hitter
    capable of 500+ foot shots....
    
    Jim
    
63.312CAMONE::WAYCome to Butt-headWed Jul 20 1994 13:5616
>    
>    I think you're heading for a big and painful fall, pal.  Any reasonably
>    sane Indians fan (like Joe Huber) should have a bit more trepidation
>    and humility than to be pushing all his chips across the table on this
>    turd.  After all his yapping about Red Sox "cancers", our friend Chappy 
>    learned the hard way, and very quickly, about Russell's chemistry lab 
>    partner in crime, Greg Harris.  Your turn awaits, my friend... ;-)
>    


IMO, this paragraph is one of the most outstanding paragraphs I've seen
since I've been reading SPORTS....


Just had to say it.

63.313Did I say I liked Harris Glen?????????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Wed Jul 20 1994 14:188
    
    
        Don't move to fast Glen. You don't want to break Saw's nose off in
    your Butt! :-)
    
    
    
    Chappy
63.314CAMONE::WAYCome to Butt-headWed Jul 20 1994 14:4814
>                  -< Did I say I liked Harris Glen????????? >-
>
>    
>    
>        Don't move to fast Glen. You don't want to break Saw's nose off in
>    your Butt! :-)
    
    
    
Hey, I can just appreciate a witty turn of phrase, and Glenn certainly
did that in that paragraph.

He's still on my sh*t list for his crack about my main Jurgen Klinsmann
though 8^)
63.315It was just your perfect timing, Chap...NAC::G_WAUGAMANIl Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo!Wed Jul 20 1994 14:5816
    
>            -< Did I say I liked Harris Glen????????? >-
    
    No, but it was absolutely beautiful how within a week of your "everyone 
    who leaves Boston is a cancer" speech, Harris flamed out in New York 
    under a hailstorm of dissension with his manager.  Harris came in 
    whining about misuse and Buck Showalter's response was "I don't want 
    to hear any of that crap".  Two shellackings later, Harris and his 
    'tude were gone.  How come everyone Buck doesn't like is branded a 
    cancer in New York? 
    
    If the Red Sox can just continue to strategically place these Trojan 
    Horses around the league, they just may get somewhere...
    
    glenn
    
63.316We don't need no stinkin Butt Monkeys......WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Wed Jul 20 1994 15:008
    
    
    
          Oh Thanks for clarifying that for me Glen.
    
    
    
    Chap
63.317CAMONE::WAYCome to Butt-headWed Jul 20 1994 15:106
>                -< We don't need no stinkin Butt Monkeys...... >-

Interesting choice of words considering all the problems the Yanks are
having referencing primates these days.....


63.318Nominate Chappy for Yankee Director of Media Relations!NAC::G_WAUGAMANIl Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo!Wed Jul 20 1994 15:161
    
63.319Bagwell???BSS::MENDEZWed Jul 20 1994 16:005
    refresh my memory Sox fans
    
    Didn't Bagwell use to play for Boston??  
    
    
63.320Are you trying to be funny?????????AD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneWed Jul 20 1994 16:055
    
    
     No Jeff Bagwell NEVER played for the Boston Red Sox.
    
    Jerry
63.321ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Wed Jul 20 1994 16:1640
    
    A few quick back-from-brief-vacation thoughts...
    
    1) Assuming it really was Belle's bat, or Belle knew it was corked,
       this has to rate (as Glenn noted) as one of the stupidest stunts
       of the year.  Thankfully, the loss of Belle for 10 games shouldn't
       make a huge difference (a game or less).
    
    2) It now seems certain that Baerga will reach double digits in
       walks.  If he could make that _triple_ digits, he'd be an MVP
       candidate; OTOH, he's doing wonders for his eventual HOF
       chances by getting every hit possible...
    
    3) Other than Baerga and Alomar, the batters are slumping (or at
       least were until last night).  I think it's mainly Chicago
       pitching that's the problem...
    
    4) Hargrove's clearly worried about a strike; otherwise, Ramirez
       wouldn't be sitting down so often for the immortal Wayne Kirby.
    
    5) I'm not going to argue too much with Russell if he can at least
       act like a closer for now.  The downside to the trade (losing
       Nabholz) wasn't huge, though it seems most Indians fans totally
       dismiss Nabholz, who I think can pitch.
    
    6) There is no #6.
    
    7) If Hargrove allows Grimsley to throw 130 pitches again this year
       he should be shot.  OK, maybe just winged with a boomerang, but
       hopefully he's learned his lesson.
    
    8) Eddie Murray is now 6 for 8 in stolen base attempts.
    
    9) If Alomar can finish the season healthy, it will be a great
       season for him, even given the general offensive increase
       around the league.  I'm really curious, though, why he's
       hitting over 100 points better (.306 vs. .175) versus
       _righties_.
    
    Joe 
63.322ah yes, the box score we've been waiting for...SALEM::DODAWorkin' on mysteries without any cluesThu Jul 21 1994 03:404
I damn near wet my pants watching Jeff do it to someone else for 
a change.

daryll
63.323Or maybe it was Hargroves terrible use of the 'penAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneThu Jul 21 1994 11:179
    
    
     Hal/Chief.....
    
      How'bout that Jeff Russell game on the line pressure situation whoa
    whata pick up.  Headline in the Plain Dealer (I think thats the one)
    will read "Russell not able to concentrate cat has flu".
    
    Jerry
63.324ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Jul 21 1994 12:3325
    
>           -< Or maybe it was Hargroves terrible use of the 'pen >-
    
    Huh?  I can argue with some moves, but the use of the pen wasn't
    bad (if, as Hargrove has to, you assume Russell is a real closer).
    
    BTW, wasn't Russell's demise supposed to be a bit farther off?  B^(
    
    The one move I really have trouble with was _not_ having Murray
    sac bunt in the 11th.
    
    Now, I hate the sac bunt 99% of the time - it's a one run strategy,
    and one run strategies invariably decrease the number of total
    expected runs by giving up outs.  But in the 11th inning of a tie
    game at home, with the leadoff runner on base and two very hot
    players following... doesn't this scream sac bunt?
    
    Highlight for the Indians: Derek Lilliquist remembers how to pitch.
    
    Lowlight: Mark Clark out 4-6.
    
    Hopefully one of (Ogea, Tavarez, Lopez) will finally be given a real
    shot, rather than sending out Mesa or something...
    
    Joe
63.325left off the :*)AD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneThu Jul 21 1994 12:588
    
    
    Joe...
    
     I was just making excuses that Russell will use for his shortcommings.
    No dig at Hargrove intended.
    
    Jerry
63.326CAMONE::WAYCome to Butt-headThu Jul 21 1994 13:058
Russell's demise comes anytime there's a pressure save situation, whether
it's opening day or what.

All of the little stats that Hal has been posting go right out the window,
mainly because of Russell blowing it last night.....


'Saw
63.327HalWatch, Day 1NAC::G_WAUGAMANIl Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo!Thu Jul 21 1994 13:2111
    
    A very low-pressure _easy_ save situation too, I might add.  I also
    flipped the game over at 11 PM just in time to catch the main event.  
    Russell was fortunate not to have given up 6 runs, much less 3, but 
    he still got the job done as far as the Rangers were concerned.  It's
    the same Jeff Russell I saw with the Sox:  wild, no control of his
    breaking pitches, forced to bring in the meat.  Gawd, that didn't take
    long at all, did it?
    
    glenn
    
63.328ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Jul 21 1994 13:374
    
    No, not nearly as long as I'd hoped... B^(
    
    Joe
63.329Normally sequels aren't as good as the original, but...NAC::G_WAUGAMANIl Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo!Thu Jul 21 1994 13:429
    
>    No, not nearly as long as I'd hoped... B^(
    
    Better now than in the World Series, as happened with Trojan Horse I, 
    Jeff Reardon.  The Yankees got rid of Trojan Horse II a bit too quickly
    for my tastes and now we're down to everyone's favorite human being...
    
    glenn
    
63.330Look for Indians' bubble to burstOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Jul 21 1994 13:515
    Matt Clark(11-3) suffered a broken wrist and is out 4-6 weeks. The
    Indians,last night,again proved that no lead is safe with their bullpen
    and blew several big leads on the was to a 13-11 11 inning loss.
    
    The White Sox are poised to blow things open this weekend.
63.331Sorry Saps!!!!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Thu Jul 21 1994 14:108
    
    
         Seeing you Sox fans are so quickly to mention Jeff Russell's night
    last night. How did your saviour Nabholz due last night Huh?
    
    
    
    Chappy
63.332ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Jul 21 1994 14:1328
    
>                     -< Look for Indians' bubble to burst >-

    How so?  There's nothing, save Clark's injury which _might_ be
    offset by the callup of one of the kids, that indicates that
    the Tribe is anything other than what they appear to be - one of
    the top four teams in the AL this year, though not quite as good
    as Chicago.
    
>    Indians,last night,again proved that no lead is safe with their bullpen
>    and blew several big leads on the was to a 13-11 11 inning loss.
    
    Actually, the bullpen took one big step _forward_ last night,
    as Lilliquist was in '92-'93 form.  Mesa and Plunk were fair at
    best.  Only Russell was truly bad; Casian only threw two really
    bad pitches (the HR by Gonzalez and FO by Palmer).  Overall, I
    was somewhat encouraged by the performance of the non-Russell
    bullpen.
    
>    The White Sox are poised to blow things open this weekend.
    
    Could happen.  I think a split is most likely, but that hurts the
    Tribe.  If they can win 3 of 4, they're tied; a sweep and they're
    in good shape.
    
    Go Tribe!
    
    Joe
63.333He got hammered I quess but would rather have him than RussellAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneThu Jul 21 1994 15:518
    
    
    Hey Chappy...
    
     No Red Sox fan I know of called Nabholtz a savoir.  A 5th starter
    yes, savior hardly.
    
    Jerry
63.334Russells 94 problems mostly mentalAKOCOA::BREENThu Jul 21 1994 16:2013
    Unlike say Lee Smith who is consistent but never exceptional, Russell
    can be both very good and very bad.  He had an excellent season for sox
    last year until arm injuries cut the season short.  He also had an
    incentive contract.
    
    This year he's been very insonsistent until just before being traded
    when it looked like he finally came around.  He voiced frustrations
    which I'm inclined to believe are more prevalent on sox (vs duquette) 
    than some want to believe (non whitefield clique of globe sports fe.)
    
    Considering the market the indians made an excellent deal and I wish
    them well in there attempts to beat out Orioles for the wildcard spot
    (but don't count the jays out completely).
63.335DZIGN::ROBICHAUDRock LobsterThu Jul 21 1994 16:304
    	So has Russell instructed the Cleveland front office to take
    chemistry lessons yet?
    
    				   /Don
63.336USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jul 21 1994 18:157
>                     -< Look for Indians' bubble to burst >-

About a month ago I mentioned that the Indians pitching staff looks like
one that will have a hard time maintaining a good level of performance
through 162 games.  I think they will have to out-score people (it may
be happening already) to keep winning, and the bullpen may get burned
out.  They look like a late-80s Yankees team.
63.337Hargrove retainedFXTROT::ALLEMANGMon Jul 25 1994 17:194
The Indians will hold a press conference this afternoon to announce a 
contract extension for Mr. Hargrove.  No surprise here...  I didn't
hear any details as to bucks or duration. 
63.338ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Jul 26 1994 13:3629
    
    Hargrove's been signed through '96.
    
    On the Cleveland Sports Mailing List, I did a quick little review
    of Hargrove as a manager, focusing on what I consider to be the
    most important aspects of managing - player development and team
    building.  (As a game day manager, I'm mixed on Hargrove - he was
    smart enough to have Plunk pitch to Frank Thomas in a critical
    situation this weekend (Thomas is 0-for-13 lifetime vs. Plunk),
    and doesn't give up intentional walks or overuse one run strategies,
    but some of his handling of pitchers really irritates me.)
    
    It's hard to judge the team building front impartiality, but to my
    eyes it looks like Hargrove has done a wonderful job - there is
    a sense of being a team in player quotes that I've never seen among
    the Indians before, despite the adversities the team has faced.
    
    As far as player development goes though - wow.  Since Hargrove
    took over, he's turned the following players into regulars:
    Alomar, Belle, Baerga, Thome, Ramirez, Kirby, Sorrento, Whiten.
    About the only talented player he hasn't managed to make a regular
    is Mark Lewis.
    
    The pitchers are much the same case - Nagy, Clark, Lilliquist, Plunk,
    Olin, Mesa, and Grimsley have all become regulars under Hargrove.
    
    I'm really glad to see that his contract's been extended.
    
    Joe
63.339ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Fri Jul 29 1994 13:4420
    
    Re .330
    
>    The White Sox are poised to blow things open this weekend.
    
    They didn't, and now the Indians have moved back in front, even
    with Baerga & Clark out...
    
    I just realized this morning that the Indians have, realistically,
    6 potential future HOF in their lineup - Murray's a lock; Belle,
    Baerga, and Lofton all have nice starts, and Thome and Ramirez
    have the potential (the Brock2 projection of Thome, for anyone
    who's read Bill James, show him retiring with over 500 HR).
    
    It's been an incredible season so far.  The Tribe needs a good
    series in NY - they really could use 2 wins - but the White Sox
    have cooled off (finally) and the Tribe has a 4.5 game lead on
    the Orioles now.
    
    Joe
63.340USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jul 29 1994 14:2816
>    the Tribe has a 4.5 game lead on the Orioles now.

This is the one to focus on (IMO) more than the White Sox.  The way
I see it, winning the division isn't that important.  The 1st-round
playoff format gives the division winner 3 home games in the 5-game
series.  BUT, they're the last 3 games !  The baseball rulers claim
this is the home-field advantage.  Tell that to the division winner(s)
who drops one or both of the first 2 games at the other team's park,
and goes back home needing to win 2 of 3, or sweep all 3.

The pennant race is happening now (through 8/12).  If they come
back in Sept, anyone more then 5 games back is probably cooked,
especially if they don't play the team they're chasing.  Hopefully
the whole season doesn't get thrown out.  It's nice to see Cleveland
in the hunt.  Although I hope they continue to have problems with
the Yanks.
63.341WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Mon Aug 01 1994 11:507
    
    
    
         Yanks own the tribe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    Chap
63.342bums!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSMon Aug 01 1994 14:277
    
    	for now..........
    
    		WaHooooooo!
    
    	the Chief
    
63.343ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Aug 01 1994 15:1010
    
    ...and for no particularly good reason.  B^(
    
    Very disappointing series; the pitching was OK, but the hitting went
    South.  1 run?  Exceedingly impressive performance by Key.
    
    Thankfully, the Indians only face the Yankees 3 or 4 more times this
    year, and in Cleveland at that.
    
    Joe  
63.344METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Aug 01 1994 15:105
That is you hope the Yankees and Indians meet again this season.

The Crazy Met

63.345PTOVAX::SCHRAMMMon Aug 01 1994 16:275
    
    You really think Eddie Murray's a lock HOF?  He has been a good player
    for many years but I'm not sure as a HOF (especially a lock). I put
    Murray in a class of great players (but not HOF) such as Garvey,
    Parker, Rice, ....
63.346The scooter was a verry good SS but no AD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneMon Aug 01 1994 16:4421
    
    
    I have to agree.  But with the water'd down HOF now does it really
    matter?  Murray, Rice, Evans (both Dwight and Darrell) all had very
    solid and in some cases Rice in '78, outstanding career's, but HOF
    I wouldn't vote them in.  They have let some below HOF'ers in but
    its not like it has just started to happen it has been that way all
    along.  6 years after Ripken retires he will most certianly go to 
    Cooperstown but really, does his numbers warrant it?  The streak
    included.  Yea it is remarkable and truely a (in todays world of
    sissy athletes) a superhuman feat but does that make him HOF material?
    I don't think so and I'm sure I'm not alone.  I stongly feel that
    the streak should be in Cooperstown as in a special wing like the
    no-no's perfect games, 20 K's ect but not with the Williams, Mantles
    ect.  If someone was a solid .250 hitter should they be in the Hall?
    I say no but what it someone went 162 for 648 in one season.  Not
    a great year by anyone's standards but....what if they went 1 for 4
    in every game.  Breaking Joe D's hit streak does that make one
    a Hall of Famer?
    
    Jerry
63.347Ripken and Murray yes,Phil(?)OPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Mon Aug 01 1994 16:5522
    You've got to be kidding about Ripken's HOF credentials. Even without
    the streak,he's been the dominant shortstop in the AL the past 13
    years. He's won 2 MVP's and has solid career stats.
    
    Murray has a long career of consistency that has built into numbers far
    superior to Rice and the Evans'. He's up around 460 HRs,2900 hits, and
    1700 RBI's. Nobody with those numbers has ever not been in the HOF.
    
    The HOF'er I may question,and this is unspoken around NY(pure heresy)
    is Phil Rizzuto. We have been bombarded with two straight weeks of 
    "Don't look at his numbers,he was the glue on great Yankees team
    etc",but what gets me is that he was eligible for 15 years and then has
    been on the veterans committee for so many years.
    
    Only when the Veterans Committee stacked the deck with good friends like 
    Yogi Berra,Bill White and Pee Wee Reese did he make it. I think one of
    the big reasons he made it was his announcing career which kep his
    "injustice" firmly in the public eye.
    
    I guarantee if you called up a sports talk show with this viewpoint you
    would get hung up on pretty quick. If I was in the NY media,I wouldn't
    dare mention it either.
63.348ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Aug 01 1994 19:0815
    
>    You really think Eddie Murray's a lock HOF?  He has been a good player
>    for many years but I'm not sure as a HOF (especially a lock). I put
>    Murray in a class of great players (but not HOF) such as Garvey,
>    Parker, Rice, ....
    
    Garvey in the same class as Murray?  Only if you ignore the little things,
    like walks and home runs...
    
    Murray strikes me as easily the strongest candidate among (Murray,
    Garvey, Parker, Rice), and I do think he'll go in without a problem
    (the HR and RBI will look really nice, and the decent walk total won't
    hurt).
    
    Joe
63.349METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Aug 01 1994 20:028
Murray could probalby DH another year or 2 - yuck (about the DH part) - and
get to 3000 hits and incerdibly close to or past 500 HR. Those are automatic
qualifiers for HoF unless the criteria that seem to be used are radically
changed.

The Crazy Met

63.350USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Aug 03 1994 20:3418
>    Only when the Veterans Committee stacked the deck with good friends like 
>    Yogi Berra,Bill White and Pee Wee Reese did he make it. I think one of
>    the big reasons he made it was his announcing career which kep his
>    "injustice" firmly in the public eye.

The biggest reason for Phil Rizzuto being in the HoF is Pee Wee Reese.
Once he got in, Rizzuto had to be elected.  Former players say they
were the best SS's in MLB at that time (defense is part of the game, a
part nearly everyone forgets).  Ted Williams says Rizzuto was the best
SS he ever saw.

I never saw the guy play, but he played with a team full of HoFs
and STILL won the AL MVP award.  That alone tells me he wasn't some
average player.

Being a Yankee fan I've always taken Rizzuto-bashers as really doing
Yankee-bashing more than anything else.  Maybe that's why it took so
long for him to get his just reward.
63.351HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Aug 03 1994 20:5214
RE                    <<< Note 63.350 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>Being a Yankee fan I've always taken Rizzuto-bashers as really doing
>Yankee-bashing more than anything else.  Maybe that's why it took so
>long for him to get his just reward.

  It's also announcer bashing. In basketball Bob Cosy had a lot more respect
before he started announcing games. 

  Also, wasn't Rizzuto the one who did some really obnoxious and sleazy
commercials for some sort of furniture company? That sort of thing wouldn't
help.

  George
63.352CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is two years old!!Wed Aug 03 1994 21:155
Yea, the only bashing of the Scooter from this corner is as an announcer.  The 
few clips I saw of him as a ballplayer, he was pretty slick.  As an announcer,
he's the worst I've heard since Johnny Most.

=Bob=
63.353Cheapening the HallOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Fri Aug 05 1994 03:4015
    =Bob=:
    
    Rizzuto has definitely regressed in recent years. He's a pain to listen
    to even if you live near him and know what he's talking about. From
    1956 to about the early 80's he was a decent announcer.
    
    Joe:
    
    I don't deny that he was probably deserving compared to many they have
    let in in recent years. It just leaves a bad taste in my mouth to see 
    someone get so many chances and only when the deck is totally stacked 
    does he get in. 
    
    Now Scotter is trying to get Richie Ashburn,Nellie Fox and some other
    contemporaries in. Cheapens the Hall of Fame,IMO.
63.354STRATA::RPETERSONFri Aug 05 1994 19:006
      I guess you'd have to see those guys play to appretiate them being in
    the HOF. As far as the gripes against the Scooter I think that if guys
    like Ted Williams say he's the best SS he's ever seen then you can be
    pretty sure he deserves to be there. It's the Hall of Fame and the
    scooter is famous for being a great SS.
    
63.355What about Marty Marion?MUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRSun Aug 07 1994 11:507
On this subject, check out Bill James' recent book, _The_Politics_of_Glory_.
In addition to a history of the Hall and its selection processes (and the
repeated cheapening of membership by the Veterans' Committee), he attempts
to analyze the de facto criteria for membership and to rate current and
potential future members according to those criteria.  Highly recommended.

Steve
63.356Active Hall of FamersOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Mon Aug 08 1994 13:0726
    IMO the active eligible (> 10 years) most likely HOF'ers:
    
    1) Cal Ripken- Even without the streak,two MVP's and great numbers for 
    a shortstop. The streak makes him one-of-a-kind.
    2) Dave Winfield - 3000 hits and almost 500 HR's
    3) Dennis Eckersley- the best releiver in last 10 years and a fine
    starter for first 10 years.
    4) Tony Gwynn-The best hitter in the last 20 years
    5) Wade Boggs-The second best hitter in the last 20 years
    6) Ricky Henderson-Best base stealer and leadoff hitter ever.
    7) Ozzie Smith-maybe the best at his position ever
    8) Roger Clemens-The best pitcher of the last 10 years
    9) Eddie Murray-never great,but he's going to wind up in the top 15 for
    almost every major category.
    10)Paul Molitor-His last few years nail down the HOF.
    Borderliners: Don Mattingly,Joe Carter,Andre Dawson,Tim Raines,Jack
    Morris,Kirby Puckett,Lou Whitaker,
    
    Might have beens: Darryl Strawberry,Doc Gooden,Eric Davis
    As long as they get 10 years they're in:
    Barry Bonds,Frank Thomas,Ken Griffey jr,Greg Maddux,Jose Canseco
    
    I'm certain I've missed some names but this was done quickly.
    Glenn,fill in the errors.
    
    
63.357ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Aug 08 1994 14:2711
    
    Getting back to the Indians (and off the HoF rathole I started)...
    
    Disappointing series against the Sox this weekend.  I was at the
    2nd game on Saturday, which was fun, though I would have liked to have
    seen Thome.  Ramirez's shot was beautiful to watch.
    
    Down 1 game for the division, up 2 & 2.5 (KC and Baltimore,
    respectively) for the wild card - it's been a great season so far...
    
    Joe
63.358CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is two years old!!Mon Aug 08 1994 14:306
Yabut

I guess the Indians were glad to get Albert "Corky" Belle back.  Dinger in 
his firsted at-bat after his suspension - how about that!

=Bob=
63.359ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Aug 08 1994 14:398
    
    Re .358
    
    Decidely.  Even a team w/ as much offensive power as the Indians
    is going to be better when the 2nd best offensive player in the 
    league (3rd best overall) is back...
    
    Joe
63.360Jeff Russell....an Indian SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Aug 09 1994 11:466
    
    	Ya gotta love Belle when he took those two foul balls and threw
    	them over the fence.  HaHaHa.  
    
    	WaHooooooo!
    
63.361CAMONE::WAYTry 664/668, Neighborhood of The BeastTue Aug 09 1994 12:519
>    
>    	Ya gotta love Belle when he took those two foul balls and threw
>    	them over the fence.  HaHaHa.  
>    
>    	WaHooooooo!
>

Yeah, I know.  It gave me a stiffie......    

63.362ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Aug 09 1994 14:267
    
    I _believe_ that the Indians have now clenched the if_the_players_and_
    owners_refuse_to_move_an_inch_until_October wild card, and remain just
    1 game behind Chicago.  When Ruben Amaro is producing runs (but not
    generally starting), you know the team's doing OK... B^)
    
    Joe
63.3631ST IN MY LIFETIMESUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Aug 09 1994 18:4218
    
    	Lets......
    
    		Celebrate
    			Celabrate
    				Selabrate
    					selebrate
    		Sellebrate
    			Sellabrate
    				Cellabrate
    					
    
    		Ahhhh forget it.   Lets have a beer!  or two  or three...
    
    
    		WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
    
    
63.364HANNAH::ASHEConjunction jct, what's yo function?Tue Aug 09 1994 19:512
    Keep beating that drum...
    
63.365ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Wed Aug 10 1994 12:4018
    
    Good news first:
    
    The Indians released Jack Morris yesterday.  I have to say, he had more
    left than I thought.  He still stunk 75% of the time, though, and
    given his recent habit of heading to Montana between starts, the
    move makes a lot of sense.  This provides another opportunity for a
    young starter (probably Ogea) to gain a foothold in the majors.
    
    Also, Chicago lost.
    
    And the bad news:
    
    The Tribe was trounced by the Blue Jays last night.  DiPoto and
    Casian were awful; Stottlemyre wasn't much better, but _was_
    better.
    
    Joe
63.366CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is two years old!!Wed Aug 10 1994 13:2813
Timing seems funny on the Morris release, but I guess there are several factors:

1. He is approaching a_innings pitched bonus in his contract. 

2. He apparently was spending more effort on his farm in {mumble-mumble} than
   on the ballclub.  Of course this may have been on of those sour-grapes
   things that ball clubs sometimes do.  Kinda a_"addition by subtraction" 
   thing.

I suspect that at 39, and with a big contract, Morris will now have plenty of
time to spend on the farm.

=Bob=
63.367Bye JackOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Wed Aug 10 1994 13:5310
    Jack Morris was one of baseball's best pitchers in the 80's. He had a
    fabulous world series for Minnesota in 1991. His game 7 performance
    clinched his place in baseball lore.
    
    His behavior since then could be used as an exhibit in the public's
    case against spoiled baseball players. Remember how emotional he was
    after the 1991 WS? "All I ever wanted to do was play for Minnesota.
    This is my home" ... And then two months later,taking Toronto's money..
    
    Unfortunately,there are a lot of Jack Morris types running around.
63.368ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Wed Aug 10 1994 13:5814
    
>   Of course this may have been on of those sour-grapes things that ball
>   clubs sometimes do.  Kinda a_"addition by subtraction" thing.
    
    "Sour-grapes"?  If he was pitching in his '91 form, or even '92 form,
    I don't think the question of realeasing him would have ever come up.
    But he wasn't; with the exception of a half dozen starts, he's
    been horrendous this season, and the Indians have a _lot_ of pitchers
    who they're going to have to give a chance to sink-or-swim in the
    majors in the next year and a half.  (Certainly Ogea, Tavarez, Mlicki,
    and Lopez; possibly Kirkreit, Carter, Lynch, Crawford, Byrd, and
    others....)
    
    Joe
63.369HANNAH::ASHEHookin' up words &amp; phrases &amp; clausesWed Aug 10 1994 14:013
    Morris was like that before he left Detroit.  That's why they didn't
    make an effort to resign him before he went to Minnesota...
    
63.370CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is two years old!!Wed Aug 10 1994 14:159
Yabut you have to at least consider that the Indian's major decision point here
was not his attitude, but the combination of that an the money he was about to 
get.  I wouldn't be surprised if they had planned this all along - unless he
was doing remarkably well, they would release him once he approached his 
"innings bonus".  This is what the Red Sox did with Greg Harris.

Also, what David said...

=Bob=
63.371sounds like Indians did Jack a favorAKOCOA::BREENWed Aug 10 1994 14:1910
    Doesn't this pay Morris regardless of strike wheras he would not be
    paid during strike.
    
    He not only carried Detroit and won a world series for Minny but he was
    invaluable to Toronto.  He was perfect example of a guy who returned on
    the investment.
    
    And Indians are doing pretty well with Jack, wonder how they'd have
    done without him.  Pena was a great move for the tribe and a very
    stupid release by the sox.
63.372HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Aug 10 1994 14:2416
RE      <<< Note 63.367 by OPTION::LAZARUS "David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353" >>>

>    His behavior since then could be used as an exhibit in the public's
>    case against spoiled baseball players. Remember how emotional he was
>    after the 1991 WS? "All I ever wanted to do was play for Minnesota.
>    This is my home" ... And then two months later,taking Toronto's money..
    
  Well I wouldn't say it's the "public's case" against the players, more like
the radio call in crowd's case against the players. I'm part of the public
and I have no gripe against the players at all.

  As a Red Sox fan I'd love to see a guy win game 7 of a World Series for the
Sox. From that point I wouldn't care where he went. At least we'd have a
championship. 

  George (1918 and waiting)
63.373ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Wed Aug 10 1994 16:3848
    
    Re .370
    
    If money was the main concern, why not just wait until after the
    seemingly unavoidable strike?  Morris already passed at least one
    innings bonus - I believe the first one was at 90 innings - and
    wasn't pitching all too well up to that point.  I honestly don't
    believe, if he were just showing 1992 form (which was below average,
    but not unredeemable), they would have kept him on.  He wasn't.
    
    Re .371
    
    Morris contract is not guarentee; the Indians will owe him no more
    or less than they would if they'd kept him until the end of the
    first game after Aug. 11.
    
    And yes, the Indians were doing pretty well with Jack.  They're
    also doing pretty well with Alvaro Espinoza, but that doesn't mean
    Espinoza's any good either.
    
    The fact is, Morris is through.  It appeared that way before the
    year started; it seems quite clear now.  He had a few good outings
    this year, scattered among hoards of bad ones.  The Indians have
    a lot of young pitchers who, after working through their initial
    adjustments to the major leagues, should be miles better than the
    1994 Jack Morris.
    
    And Pena was _not_ (IMHO) a stupid release by the Sox.  The Sox aren't
    going anywhere this year; they might as well play guys who will be
    around when the team does have a chance to go somewhere.  The
    Indians have a chance to win this year; signed to a bargain contract,
    it was felt that Pena could help more than Levis or Merullo (a bad
    assumption, in my opinion, but one that had provided decent
    results).
    
    Morris' stats:
    
    141.1 innings
    163 hits (35 doubles, 4 triples, 14 HR)
    67 walks
    100 strikeouts
    OBA against - .369
    SLG against - .444
    ERA against - 5.60
    
    His numbers last year were even worse...
    
    Joe
63.374As long as he wonOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Wed Aug 10 1994 17:456
63.375I know these ideas are not "current"AKOCOA::BREENWed Aug 10 1994 17:5619
    joe,
    	I never see it reported and it appears not to be accepted by
    current gms today like it was 'in my day' but I still observe that
    successful teams start with the catcher, then a dependable 2nd baseman
    and finally a centerfielder with range.
    
    	I would add "lefthanded defensively skilled first baseman". Exhibit
    A: Don Mattingly the mvp on American League in terms value to
    team/league standing.  I cannot watch 10 minutes of yankee play without
    him doing something that 90% of the rest cannot do.
    
    	But to the point:  Indians seem to have the three prime ingredients
    and the results show it.  Pena is part of the catching team.
    
    	Marty Barrett was the single most critical factor to redsox success 
    from 86-90 and his loss is biggest factor to decline and Pena kept sox
    in contention for two more years.
    
    billthe
63.376USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Aug 10 1994 18:108
>    2) Dave Winfield - 3000 hits and almost 500 HR's
>    9) Eddie Murray-never great,but he's going to wind up in the top 15 for
>    almost every major category.

How do people feel about longevity as a significant factor in HoF
membership ?  And the reverse side of that:  players not getting
in because they didn't play long enough, but were clearly among
the best when they played ?  (eg:  our beloved Thurman Munson)
63.377HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Aug 10 1994 18:1218
  I don't know if I can go along with the idea that teams rise and fall based
on their catcher, 2nd baseman and center fielder. Sure those are important
positions but they are not everything. Pitching is at least half the game. 

  I like the Bill James school of thought which bases everything on runs
created and runs prevented. To be successful a team has to win games which can
be predicted based on the runs they score and the runs they allow. 

  When you start looking at how runs are scored, power seems high in the list.
Total bases and on base precentage are important factors. When it comes to
preventing runs, hard throwing pitchers kill rallies with strikeouts more often
than you get saved by a double play. 

  Yes it's important to have strong defense up the middle but Marty Barret did
not make the Red Sox into a pennant winning team. Good pitching and lots of
offense by Boggs, Barret, Rice, and others resulted in all those wins. 

  George 
63.378c in there someplaceAKOCOA::BREENWed Aug 10 1994 18:1710
    three that made it without longevity were dizzy dean,koufax and joltin
    Joe DiMaggio, the latter missing three war years.  George Sisler had a
    shortened career also.
    
    I'd prefer judging by best 10-12 years and I'd consider the factor of
    how many years the player was in the top 5-7 of his peers such as
    Orlando Cepeda.
    
    I'm surprised more writers just don't simple consider "Fame" as a prime
    requisite and vote im Mazeroski(sic).
63.379CNTROL::CHILDSBack Where it All BeganWed Aug 10 1994 18:327
    
>    Well said,I agree with you. As a Ranger fan,I feel the same way about 
>    Keenan. He brought a title and now he can do as he pleases.
                ^^^^^^^ 
                       spelling? shouldn't it be bought?

 ;^)
63.380METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Aug 10 1994 18:585
MikeC, if anything it is Neil Smith who bought the title - and thanks,
we'll take it.

The Crazy Met

63.381HANNAH::ASHEHookin' up words &amp; phrases &amp; clausesWed Aug 10 1994 19:002
    tcm, I can't send you mail... got an alternate node?
    
63.382Molitor in the HoF ?USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Aug 11 1994 17:386
>    10)Paul Molitor-His last few years nail down the HOF.

Dave,

A lot of people say this, but I'm not convinced.  He has been hurt
so much in his career.  Can you post his #s that put him in the HoF ?
63.383ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Aug 11 1994 17:428
    
    Re Paul Molitor
    
    I don't have the numbers handy, but Molitor is on pace for 3000 hits
    now; he wasn't terribly close a few years back.  Given his other
    plusses, I think he's a decent bet.
    
    Joe
63.384Why can't sox get players like that! (they don't want them)AKOCOA::BREENThu Aug 11 1994 17:441
    His run from second to home on a missed double play clinched it for me
63.385CAMONE::WAYHueys are way cool...SirMon Aug 15 1994 13:0111
>Yabut you have to at least consider that the Indian's major decision point here

=Bob=,

Am I to assume, for the record, that you've taken over proprietary use 
of "Yabut" from Kev, now that he is gone?

Just curious,
'Saw


63.386CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Aug 15 1994 13:047
Yabut in this age of "open" systems, I suspect that Kev would want his "yabut" 
to become public domain, open to anyone who would like to use it.

I remain,
Keeping the spirit alive,

=Bob=
63.387ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Aug 23 1994 20:4921
    
    There's an interesting discussion going on on USENET suggesting
    (and, for the record, the suggestion was not made by and Indians
    fan, and is primarily being supported by an A's fan) that Lofton
    should be the MVP this year, or if not loses to Thomas by an
    eyelash.
    
    The thrust of the argument is that while Thomas is 33 runs better
    offensively, Lofton's defense, based on previous performance (the
    numbers for this year won't be out until after the season), can
    be expected to be 28 runs better defensively, and given (1) that
    Lofton plays CF, a more important defensive position than 1B, and
    (2) that Lofton is almost certainly better in all the things that
    aren't measured in the 33 run offensive difference above (scoring
    from 2nd on a single, and the like), Lofton is probably the
    better overall player this year.
    
    I wouldn't have thought so, really, but the argument (in full) is
    fairly convincing...
    
    Joe
63.388MSE1::FRANCUSBaseball in 94? 95? :-(Tue Aug 23 1994 20:548
    1. Runs preserved is a statisitcal category that is not accepted by
    everyone and different people calculate it differently.
    
    2. The better player (whatever that means) in a given season does not
    always win the MVP. See NL MVP 1988 as one example.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
63.389CNTROL::CHILDSMember of the Sloan Peterson FanClubWed Aug 24 1994 12:319
 with the Skanmees in first you expect someone outside of NY to win it?
 hahahaa.....

 While I think an everyday player should win it, my opinion means squat..

 Jimmy Keys all the way..........

 mike 
63.390SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Wed Aug 24 1994 13:166
    
    	Sunday's paper mentioned that Lofton was in the top 10 in 10
    seperate categorys. He was second in total bases, which is
    outstanding for a CF.
    
    Ron
63.391ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Wed Aug 24 1994 13:3328
    
>    1. Runs preserved is a statisitcal category that is not accepted by
>    everyone and different people calculate it differently.
    
    Absolutely.  The exact number doesn't really matter, though, so
    long as it's agreed that (1) Lofton's defense, relative to a league
    average CF, is better than Thomas's, relative to a league average
    1B, and (2) CF defense is more important/more difficult than 1B
    defense.
    
>    2. The better player (whatever that means) in a given season does not
>    always win the MVP. See NL MVP 1988 as one example.
    
    No doubt about that.  Of course, arguing who _will_ win the MVP
    is never as interesting as who _should_ win the MVP.  B^)  Take
    the RBI leader, and you'll have the MVP 2/3 of the time...
    
    As I said, it wasn't an argument I was expecting from a non-Indians
    fan.  Not having really spent time thinking about it, I was happy
    w/ the idea of Belle as the Indian's MVP - after all, he's got a
    higher OBP, and a ridiculously high SLG.
    
    That the Indians would have two such fantastic players on the same
    team in the same year is incredible; that they'd have three other
    players performing at star levels as well...
    
    Joe
    
63.392The real MVP, Jeff BagwellBIGQ::WESTWed Aug 24 1994 13:3512
    
    reply .389
    
    Mr C, little bitter about the Yankees, Jimmy Key should win the Cy, but
    the Yanks play as a team so the MVP should go to the team if possible 
    no one there really stands alone like Lofton, Thomas, Griffey, etc...
    
    But what do you know, Your a Red Sox fan........keep praying that the 
    strike continues, thats the only way they won't end up in the cellar..
    
    /kevin *)
    
63.393Cone is teh Cy winnerSTRATA::GARRYDallas Cowboys shooting for 3-peatWed Aug 24 1994 13:385
    Mr W lets not forget David Cone..as of right now he's the front runner
    for Cy Young.......he's got Ke yuin every category...IP,K's,ERA,SO
    
    Roger
    
63.394WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Wed Aug 24 1994 17:147
    
    
        How about wins and where his team will finish?????????
    
    
    
    Chap
63.395ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Wed Aug 24 1994 17:4721
    
    Re .394
    
    Pitcher's wins are essentially a worthless category for comparing
    pithcers, because they are heavily dependent upon how well the
    team a pitcher throws for hits when he pitches.  Jack Morris won
    10 games for the Indians this year; however, that doesn't mean he
    pitched well - he didn't, by a long shot - it means that the Indians
    scored so many runs for him (an average of over 6.5 a game) that
    the team won those 10 games he got credit for, often in spite of
    his pitching performance.
    
    And where Key's team will finish is largely irrelevant to whether
    I'd vote for him for the Cy Young award.  If I had two equal
    pitchers, it might be the deciding factor, but that's about it.
    
    Would you vote for Hill over Maddux?  I mean, Hill is on the best
    team in baseball currently, while Maddux is on a team fighting to
    make the playoffs...
    
    Joe  
63.396ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Wed Aug 24 1994 19:5114
    
    One more "more interesting than the strike" thought...
    
    Cleveland's outfield this year had to be one of the best ever
    offensively in a single season...
    
    Belle - .437 OBP, .714 SLG
    Lofton - .415 OBP, .536 SLG
    Ramirez - .361 OBP, .521 SLG
    
    Given their ages, they certainly have a chance to earn the distinction
    of being the best outfield ever over the next few years.
    
    Joe
63.397ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Aug 25 1994 14:0718
    
    Great to see a team do something nice for a player...
    
    The Indians released Matt Turner yesterday.  Turner had been
    diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease early in the season, and was
    still undergoing chemo when the strike began.  On top of that,
    his wife is pregnant.  But since the players are on strike,
    he wasn't being paid.
    
    By releasing him, the Indians are now obligated to pay his
    salary through the end of the season.  When the strike ends,
    the club will resign him to a 1995 contract (he wouldn't have
    pitched again this year anyway).
    
    Really nice to see - the only possible benefit for the Indians
    is PR, whereas for Turner this has to be a big lift.
    
    Joe
63.398GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Thu Aug 25 1994 14:329
    My daughters met Matt last year when he pitched for the marlins and
    they both became Matt Turner fans (as did I). I hopr he's doing better
    with his treatment. He was a class act to my kids, which is something I
    haven't seen a whole lot of in big league players. Do you think it
    would be possible to get a letter or card through to Turner by way of
    the Indians?
    
    Dennis Faust
     
63.399ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Aug 25 1994 14:579
    
>    Do you think it would be possible to get a letter or card through
>    to Turner by way of the Indians?
    
    I strongly suspect so.  Everything I've heard says that they do
    intend to resign him as soon as they can do so and still pay him,
    so they undoubtedly have kept some way to contact him.
    
    Joe
63.400USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Aug 25 1994 16:128
>    Belle - .437 OBP, .714 SLG
>    Lofton - .415 OBP, .536 SLG
>    Ramirez - .361 OBP, .521 SLG
>    
>    Given their ages, they certainly have a chance to earn the distinction
>    of being the best outfield ever over the next few years.

Joe, please.... best OF ever ?
63.401USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Aug 25 1994 16:135
>                           -< Cone is teh Cy winner >-

Sorry, given the Cy Young IS the pitchers' MVP award, W-L and where
his team finishes DOES mean something.  Key is presently the favorite
for the award.
63.402ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Aug 25 1994 16:3720
    
>>    Belle - .437 OBP, .714 SLG
>>    Lofton - .415 OBP, .536 SLG
>>    Ramirez - .361 OBP, .521 SLG
>>    
>>    Given their ages, they certainly have a chance to earn the distinction
>>    of being the best outfield ever over the next few years.

>Joe, please.... best OF ever ?
    
    Yes, best OF ever.  They aren't _now_, but with typical development
    Ramirez will be pushing .400 OBP, .600 SLG in a less offensively
    based year - and that plus Lofton & Belle means _no_ holes - and
    the problem with finding the best OF is often finding a good-or-
    better third outfielder.
    
    How many OF can you name where the low OBP was .361, and the low
    SLG was .521?
    
    Joe
63.403ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Aug 25 1994 17:0872
    
> Sorry, given the Cy Young IS the pitchers' MVP award, W-L and where
> his team finishes DOES mean something.  Key is presently the favorite
> for the award.
    
    No, W-L record is fairly meaningless.  Unless you believe that a
    pitcher can make his teammates score more runs...
    
    Good clue that W-L is meaningless - nearly every statistic in baseball
    for a given year is most closely related to the previous year's
    performance.  For example, to predict a player's batting average, the
    best piece of data was his batting average the previous year.  However,
    for W-L records, that's not the case.  The best predictor for W-L
    record is the previous year's ERA.
    
    I'm willing to accept team W-L record as a differentiator, as I
    said.
    
    I guess the problem here is that I believe that the Cy Young should
    go to the _best_ pitcher, as determined by matters for which the
    pitcher has control (ERA, SLG allowed, OBP allowed, and so on); you
    apparently don't.  Key's a fine pitcher, and worthy of consideration;
    Cone, on the Yankees (and with Key's run support) would have a better
    record - why penalize him for pitching on a less good team?
    
    Stats...
    
    Key - 17-3, 3.19 ERA, 161 IP, .370 SLG vs., .326 OBA vs.
    
    That's great - a wonderful season, by any measure.  But good enough
    for a 17-3 record?  Only when you see...
    
    Run Support - 6.92 runs/game.
    
    Wow.  With 7 runs of support per game, and only 3.5 allowed - no
    wonder he's won 17.
    
    Now to...
    
    Cone - 16-5, 2.94 ERA, .332 SLG vs. .277 OBA vs.
    
    That's incredible.  He's one win short of Key - despite only 
    receiving 4.91 runs of support per game.  Two whole runs/game
    less than Key.
    
    Another comparison...
    
    The average hitter facing Key has a .370 SLG, and .326 OBA.  What
    kind of hitter is that?
    
    Tim Hulett - Wes Chaberlain - Jim Edmonds - Ozzie Guillen - Lance
    Johnson - Chris Gomez - Greg Gagne - John Jaha - Jeff Reboulet -
    Pat Kelly - Rich Amaral - Felix Fermin - Dick Schofield
    
    An OK mix of players.  Essentially the whole group should be back
    to play again next year, except maybe Hulett & Amaral.  No stars,
    but you wouldn't mind filling a hole with a Johnson or Edmonds.
    
    The average hitter facing Cone has a .332 SLG, .277 OBA.  What
    kind of hitter is that?
    
    Mike Devereaux - Scott Fletcher - JT Snow - Damion Easley - Gary
    DiSarcina - Vince Coleman - Doug Strange - Ed Sprague Jr.
    
    Other than Snow (who might still be young enough to snap out of
    it) and Easley (who did put up better numbers last year), this
    group is in trouble.  Devereaux's fallen apart this year, and
    Coleman's average is quickly approaching the Mendoza line.
    Other than possibly Sprague, none of these guys hold a sure job
    for next year.
    
    Joe
63.404MSE1::FRANCUSBaseball in 94? 95? :-( Thu Aug 25 1994 17:296
    Joe, a better example of how misleading W-L is would be a comparison
    between Jack McDowell and David Cone for 1993. I don't have the
    stats but if you do take a look at them.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
63.405ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Aug 25 1994 17:4222
    
>    Joe, a better example of how misleading W-L is would be a comparison
>    between Jack McDowell and David Cone for 1993. I don't have the
>    stats but if you do take a look at them.
    
    Here goes...
    
    Cone - 11-14, 3.33 ERA, .343 SLG vs., .312 OBA vs.
    
    McDowell - 22-10, 3.37 ERA, .379 SLG vs. .314 OBA vs.
    
    In this case, however, I would have voted for McDowell.  Why?
    Because they're very similar in the most important category (ERA),
    and McDowell pitched for a team that won the AL West.  A
    good example of a case where team's performance would make a
    difference for me.
    
    Of course, it wouldn't have mattered, since I would have voted
    for Key (18-6, 3.00 ERA, .382 SLG vs., .279 OBA vs.) over either
    of them...
    
    Joe
63.406MSE1::FRANCUSBaseball in 94? 95? :-( Thu Aug 25 1994 19:144
    what was the run support per game for those 3??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
63.407how 'bout Bonds, Bonilla and Van SlykePTOVAX::SCHRAMMThu Aug 25 1994 20:106
>>    How many OF can you name where the low OBP was .361, and the low
>>    SLG was .521?
    
    
    I'm not sure but check out the OBP and SLG of the 1990 and
    1991 Pirates with Bonds, Bonilla and Van Slyke 
63.408ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Aug 25 1994 20:2213
    
    Re '93 run support...
    
    Cone - 2.97
    Key - 5.79
    McDowell - 4.88
    
    Re '90-'91 Pirate outfield
    
    I could be wrong, but I don't believe Van Slyke has ever had a SLG
    over .500.
    
    Joe
63.409Rice,Lynn, Evans 1975-198025022::BREENWhen are ya com'n back?...can't cha hear meThu Aug 25 1994 20:381
    
63.410ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Aug 25 1994 20:5311
    
    Yes, Rice, Lynn, and Evans comprise an outfield to shoot for to be
    considered the best ever.  The Yankee outfield of the late 20's is
    another one of particular note.
    
    As I said, though, the Cleveland outfield has a _chance_ to be the
    best ever.  They aren't there yet, and lots of things would have to
    go right for them to earn that distinction, but they certainly
    have the possibility...
    
    Joe
63.411USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Aug 25 1994 21:186
The subject was CY YOUNG winners !!!!!!  W-L and where your team finishes
ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY makes a difference in who is selected for the
Cy Young award.  YOU can look it up.

I'm not arguing about the merits of W-L as a general indicator of pitching
performance.
63.412MSE1::FRANCUSBaseball in 94? 95? :-( Fri Aug 26 1994 01:0910
    re: .411
    
    where the team finishes does make a difference, no question about it.
    it is not the determining factor but could tip the balance if it is a
    close call. Carlton '72, Seaver '75, Jones '76, Jenkins in ??,
    Gooden '85 all won Cy Young and were not on 1st place teams. There are
    others as well.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
63.413Likely winner != deserving winnerMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Aug 26 1994 12:5510
Unfortunately, the Cy Young voters almost always overrate the W-L
numbers in making their decision, just as the MVP voters overrate
RBI.  I have to agree with Joe:  at this moment, David Cone is a
clear winner on my ballot; last year, I too would have voted for
Jimmy Key.  I'm resigned to Key winning this year.

I suppose it's unrealistic to look for any sort of mathematical or
statistical literacy in a sportswriter.

Steve
63.414ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Mon Aug 29 1994 14:0719
    
    Re .411
    
> The subject was CY YOUNG winners !!!!!!  W-L and where your team finishes
> ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY makes a difference in who is selected for the
> Cy Young award.  YOU can look it up.

    And I wasn't arguing that it doesn't make a difference as to who wins
    the award - I agree with you completely on that front, it does.  All
    I was arguing was that, if I were voting, I wouldn't look at it. 
    
> I'm not arguing about the merits of W-L as a general indicator of pitching
> performance.
    
    And I'm not arguing about the fact the W-L tends to be the most
    significant factor in detemining the Cy Young award.
    
    So I guess we'll just have to agree to agree on that... B^)
    
63.415MSE1::FRANCUSBaseball in 94? 95? :-( Thu Sep 01 1994 19:406
    Indians must still think that the baseball season will eventually
    continue. They traded with Minnesota for Dave Winfield in exchange for
    a PTBNL.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
63.416ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Oct 04 1994 11:5915
    
    Well, the Stats, Inc. simulated season ended with the Indians
    finishing 94-68, and making the playoffs as the wild card.
    Belle ends up three HR short of the triple crown, and the
    Indians hit 247 HR - a new major league record (and one you
    heard very little about them aiming at, when there wasn't any
    reason to simulate the season).  Belle's simulated season
    looks incredible - .372 BA, .451 OBP, 52 HR, 153 RBI and .743 SLG.
    Baerga hit 30 HR, Ramirez 26 (with a .275 average - I like it),
    Thome 29, Murray 23 (with a .246 average - I don't like it).
    Nagy finishes 16-9, with a 3.37 ERA; Ogea is the only youngster to
    come through (4-3, 4.80 ERA).  The Tribe scores 927 runs, second
    only to the Yankees (w/ over 1000).
    
    Joe
63.417Didn't Yanks get over 300 HR's in '27SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Tue Oct 04 1994 13:427
    
    	Are you sure 247 HR's would have been a new record? I thought
    the '27 Yankee's had over 300 HR's?
    
    Thanks,
    
    Ron
63.418ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Oct 04 1994 13:585
    
    No, I'm not sure, but it sounds right - the current record was given
    as 240 by the 60 or 61 Yankees, and that sounds right.
    
    Joe
63.419METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 04 1994 14:115
yup 1961 Yankees have the record at 240. One of the Reds teams also had
something close to that back in the 1960's.

The Crazy Met

63.42024661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingTue Oct 04 1994 15:203
    Only in Cleveland can someone get excited by a simulated season.
    
    Mark.
63.421ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Oct 04 1994 16:007
    
    Excited?  Nah...
    
    What the Indians, and Albert Belle, were doing was exciting.
    The simulated season is mildly interesting.
    
    Joe
63.422Just like the moviesSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Oct 04 1994 16:526
    
    	I'm excited!!!  Can't wait for the simulated playoff.
    
    	The Chief...
    
    		WAHOOOOOOO
63.423ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 04 1994 16:593
63.424SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Oct 04 1994 17:054
|    Contest - name your favorite invention since the Red Sox last won
|    the world series.

the .357 Magnum
63.425HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 04 1994 17:095
  This from the team that hasn't won since the year Truman beat Dewey. 

  Now there's a recent memory. 

  George 
63.426METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 04 1994 17:118
yabbut, HAL before anyone finalizes a p_name bet with you they better make
sure that you agree to note at least once a day during the week that
you are paying up. You do have a notorious habit of ducking out of ::sprots
when the going gets tough.

The Crazy Met

63.428HANNAH::ASHEI feeel so good...Tue Oct 04 1994 17:312
    favorite invention... television, flourescent light?  The 440 cubic
    inch engine...
63.429CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Oct 04 1994 17:314
Cleveland -- City of Champions


NOT
63.430HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 04 1994 17:417
  Actually the tribe has won twice since 1918. Of course they may have still
been the "Blues" when they won it back in 1920. 

  Oh well, Boston won the 1st one and they don't have the World Series any more
so what difference does it make anyway. 

  George 
63.431ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Tue Oct 04 1994 18:096
    
    Ro .430
    
    No, in 1920 they were the Indians.
    
    Joe
63.432The next unseen key comes to mind25022::BREENTue Oct 04 1994 18:261
    
63.433Evan Goolagan (sp?) was the TEAMPTOS02::SCHRAMMEThe STONES are in town, the STONES are in town!!Tue Oct 04 1994 19:2220
    
>>> This from the team that hasn't won since the year Truman beat Dewey. 

>>> Now there's a recent memory. 

>    Now now, George. The glory days of the mid '80s Celtics, the
>    scintillating World Series of the '67 and '75 Red Sox, the
>    Super Bowl appearance of the Pats and the continuous solid
>    play of the Bruins all pale in comparison to the Cleveland
>    Whogivesadamns winning the NASL championship. Yep, that'd
>    be a real source of pride for any major league city but 
>    especially one with Cleveland's record for churning out
>    winners year after year.
    
   Same here in Pittsburgh. Of all the World Series, Stanley Cups and Super
    Bowls Pittsburgh won during my lifetime (31 years), only the
    championship of the Pittsburgh Golden Triangles (indoor tennis leauge
    in the 70's) can be compared to the might achievmant Cleveland has made
    winning the NASL.     
    
63.434HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 05 1994 12:3113
RE NASL.
    
  Less'e

  National Athletic Scholastic League    no
  National Autdoor ...
  National All Size Llll ...
  National Aviation Sky Llll ...
  Naval Aviation S... Lake ...

  I give up.

  George
63.435ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 05 1994 16:1524
63.436HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 05 1994 16:2618
  The reason I jumped back on the Patriots band wagon had more to do with the
owners than the players or the fact that they were winning. 

  I couldn't stand Pat Sullivan and Victor Kiam was even worse. Every time I
tried being a fan the owners would do something so sleazy I couldn't stand it.
They were always being sued by some employee, front office people fighting with
line backers, firing coaches during the playoffs, yuck!!! And then along came
Kiam and the Lisa Olson thing. 

  The new ownership is a breath of fresh air. I can be a fan of this team
regardless if they are winning or not. Of course if they are winning, so much
the better.

  As for the Sox, I was born a Red Sox fan, I've lived all my life a Red Sox
fan, and I'll probably remain a Red Sox fan for life. That is, if they ever
play again.

  George
63.437HTHWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Wed Oct 05 1994 16:555
    
    
    
    
          Face it both cities Sip!
63.438ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 05 1994 19:183
63.439ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Oct 06 1994 11:216
    
    Actually, I'm rather fond of Boston...
    
    NY city, however, I could live quite well without...
    
    Joe
63.440ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Tue Nov 01 1994 16:4915
    
    Rumors from Cleveland:
    
    Vizquel might not be resigned...
    
    Lopez & Tavarez for Randy Johnson...
    
    Larry Walker signed 1 day after strike ends...
    
    Felix Fermin to be signed to fill in until Jackson's ready...
    
    (OK, I made the bit about Walker up.  The rest really have been
     rumored.)
    
    Joe
63.441ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the DawgsWed Nov 02 1994 10:439
63.442Where would they play him over Ramiez???AD::HEATHNo please not Kevin KennedyWed Nov 02 1994 13:095
    
    
      Joe give it up Walker is commin to Boston.
    
    Jerry
63.443ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Wed Nov 02 1994 15:3412
>                -< Where would they play him over Ramiez??? >-
    
    Let one of (Walker, Belle, Ramirez) DH.  OK, if Walker's healthy,
    Ramirez has to DH usually (Belle does not like to DH, and doesn't
    play very well when asked to DH).
    
    It's a problem I wouldn't mind having...
    
    Though keeping everyone happy, given the contract Walker would
    require - that's a job I'd just as soon pass on.
    
    Joe
63.444Da big Unit?DECWET::BAKER&quot;Like a Rock.&quot;Fri Nov 04 1994 13:529
    hmmmmm??
    
    Re> Randy Johnson to Cleveland rumour.
    
    In the Seattle area there is no word of this
    
    But then again in Seattle, The M's treat us like mushrooms....
    
    Keep us in the dark and sh*t all over us ;*)
63.445ROCK::HUBERThe Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL!Sat Nov 26 1994 00:1511
    
    The Indians have acquired Burnitz & Roa from the Mets for three
    pitching prospects (Mlicki, Byrd, and DiPoto) plus the infamous
    PTBNL.  I like the deal - Burnitz is a useful player in spite of his
    low BA (which will undoubtedly be less low in Cleveland), and Roa is
    younger than any of the trio of Tribe pitchers, with a similar
    record of success.
    
    Any thoughts TCM?
    
    Joe
63.446ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsMon Dec 05 1994 18:2611
    
    Peter Gammons must really enjoy driving Indians fans up the wall...
    
    First, there's the Randy Johnson -for- Manny Ramirez and Julian
    Tavarez rumor.
    
    Now, there's the "Indians very interested in Andre Dawson" rumor...
    
    Yuck.
    
    Joe
63.447Maybe Willie Mays would be interestedMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Dec 09 1994 11:327
Just now saw .446 and I have to say the Andre Dawson part of it is
at least plausible.  They went for Dave Winfield, didn't they?

On the other rumor:  Joe, wouldn't you do Johnson for Ramirez and
Tavarez?  If I were the Injuns, I sure would.

Steve
63.448ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 09 1994 14:016
63.449I see your point, GroanerMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Dec 09 1994 14:4911
I guess I'm having trouble adjusting to the 90s.  All I was thinking about
were the 20 ballgames the big unit was going to win.

Offhand I don't know the state of Johnson's contract.  I can't remember
having read about him signing recently, so maybe he'll be available on
the open market (whatever its nature turns out to be).

In any case, he can pitch for me any time.  As long as I live, I will not
forget John Kruk batting against him in the 1993 All Star Game.

Steve
63.450ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Dec 09 1994 16:266
63.451ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsMon Dec 12 1994 11:288
    
>On the other rumor:  Joe, wouldn't you do Johnson for Ramirez and
>Tavarez?  If I were the Injuns, I sure would.
    
    Not a chance.  I'd love to have Johnson, sure, but not for Ramirez.
    Maybe for Tavarez.
    
    Joe
63.452ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 15 1994 11:1313
63.453ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 11:4111
63.454HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 13:388
RE    <<< Note 63.453 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "STEELERS Best in the AFC Central" >>>

>    Indians > Red Sox

  Not very likely. As it now sits, John Harrington is the lead negotiator
for the owners and Clemens seems to be one of the key players for the Union. 

  George
63.455"get a clue"AIMHI::KCUMMINGSTue Jan 03 1995 13:4220
    
    
    Re> Must be the officiating...naw, there wasn't any missed grabbing the
    face mask calls....
    
    The Browns were the better team on Sunday..NO doubt!
    
    BUT....
    
    Cavs> Celtics?   Take a look up at the ceiling in the Gahden next time
    your there!
    
    Indians>  There as pathetic as the Red Sox...no advantage
    there....Atleast we make it to the World Series...When's the last time
    the Clevescum Indians did?
    
    Browns?  Advantage here this year....but that is going to slip away
    fast!!
    
    No bandwagon jumper here!
63.456HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 13:475
  Problem is that the Indians are peaking right now while the Sox are an
up and coming team. By the time the regular players get back on the field,
the Indians may no longer be better than the Sox.

  George
63.457ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 14:0314
63.458ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsTue Jan 03 1995 14:098
>  Problem is that the Indians are peaking right now while the Sox are an
>up and coming team. By the time the regular players get back on the field,
>the Indians may no longer be better than the Sox.
    
    Interesting idea - why do you believe this?   The core of the Tribe
    is still mostly pre- or early- prime...
    
    Joe
63.459You forgot the institutionMSBCS::GALVINR.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625Tue Jan 03 1995 14:3711
    
>    When you look real close, the Boston area has had the Celtics and
>    that's about it... and now that the dynasty is over, they have nada.
 
    The Bruin's have made the post season play EVERY YEAR since 1967. 
    During that time they have won 2 Stanley Cups, and have made it to the
    finals on at least 3 other occasions.  How's Clevescums hockey team
    been doing???
    
    RTG   
    
63.460HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 15:1919
RE    <<< Note 63.457 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "STEELERS Best in the AFC Central" >>>
    
>    Are we talking about ancient history or present.  I'm talking about
>    present.  RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW THIS SEASON OR THE RECENTLY COMPLETED
>    SEASON...

  What recently completed season? No one completes seasons any more. Some
times they don't even start seasons.
    
>    When you look real close, the Boston area has had the Celtics and
>    that's about it... and now that the dynasty is over, they have nada.
    
  By the time the real players return to the field, the Indians will have
peaked and the Red Sox will roll over them easily.

  As for the Browns, they just managed to get away with their hide this time
but next year the Pats will grind them to a pulp.

  George
63.461HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 15:2012
RE<<< Note 63.458 by ROCK::HUBER "Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions" >>>

>    Interesting idea - why do you believe this?   The core of the Tribe
>    is still mostly pre- or early- prime...
    
  You're taking my comments out of context. This isn't a rational debate, it's
a rabid fan debate.

  GO PATS!!!!
  GO SOX!!!!!!!

  George
63.462Admittedly, .461 puts it in perspectiveMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRTue Jan 03 1995 15:5214
.460:
    
>  By the time the real players return to the field, the Indians will have
> peaked and the Red Sox will roll over them easily.

In other words, George, you don't figure the strike will be settled until
Belle and Lofton have retired.

Of course, that would mean that the Red Sox have somehow built up a farm
system in the interim.

Sounds pretty unlikely to me.

Steve
63.463ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 15:5918
63.464"huh"AIMHI::KCUMMINGSTue Jan 03 1995 16:0314
    
    
    Past Present ...whatever..
    
    Let's say "overall" the past upteen years...
    
    What's Cleveland WON?  
    
    How many Championships compared to Boston?  Don't blow your horn about 
    Clevescum unless you got solid facts. One season into the playoffs in
    F-ball and One uncompleted season in baseball does hold water!
    
    Again, the Celts aren't gonna win it this year on next or etc but, I'LL
    still be a fan....NOT a wagon jumper!   
63.465HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 16:078
RE          <<< Note 63.462 by MUNDIS::SSHERMAN "Steve Sherman @MFR" >>>

>In other words, George, you don't figure the strike will be settled until
>Belle and Lofton have retired.

  I don't think you are following the spirit of this discussion.

  George
63.466Let's put this in perspective.....USCTR1::BARRYTue Jan 03 1995 16:134
    
    I don't care if the Browns win the Superbowl; Cavs win the NBA; and the
    Indians win the pennant, I'd rather sleep on a sidewalk in Chelsea than
    live for a day in Cleveland.
63.467ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 16:1610
63.468HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 16:1910
RE    <<< Note 63.467 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "STEELERS Best in the AFC Central" >>>

>    The only good thing that ever came out of Boston was an EMPTY BUS!
    
  I've seen this before and it looks like it's suppose to be funny but I don't
understand the joke.

  What's the significance of an Empty Bus?

  George
63.469ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 16:284
63.470"Squat"AIMHI::KCUMMINGSTue Jan 03 1995 16:456
    
    
    
    Who cares about buses....back to the point....
    
    Cleveland hasn't won S***!  
63.471HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 17:039
  If I were a Cleveland fan I'd keep rubbing Bostonians nose in 1948 when they
ended up tied with the Red Sox and beat them in the playoff game then went on
to beat the Boston Braves in the World in 6. 

  That was probably Cleveland's proudest moment. For Boston I don't know. You
could point to the start of the Revolutionary War and the birth of our nation
but then that's not really anything to do with sports.

  George 
63.472Boston has had proud moments in baseballMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRTue Jan 03 1995 17:086
There were all those World Series wins in the teens.

BTW, today is the 75th anniversary of the sale of Babe Ruth to
the Yankees.

Steve
63.473ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsTue Jan 03 1995 17:3714
>> Interesting idea - why do you believe this?   The core of the Tribe
>> is still mostly pre- or early- prime...
    
> You're taking my comments out of context. This isn't a rational debate, it's
> a rabid fan debate.
    
    OK, I see now...
    
    (Though, I must admit, I originally misread your note as touting the
     superiority of the _White_ Sox.  Had I realized quickly enough that
     you were referring to the _Red_ Sox, I wouldn't have found the idea
     quite so interesting, save from a psychological perspective... B^)
    
    Joe
63.474ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS Best in the AFC CentralTue Jan 03 1995 18:3118
63.475MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 03 1995 18:3813
    
       Over the past five years neither city has won a title in football, 
      basketball or baseball. If you want to hang your hat on divsion or
      conference championships then go ahead. You really have to because
      it's all you have. If you want to talk world championships then
      throw your hat on that chair over there because you haven't won any.
      I'd venture to guess that you weren't even alive when the Browns 
      won those titles in the '50s. I however can remember vividly the great
      Bruins teams ofthe early '70s, the three Red Sox trips to the WS in
      the last three decades, the great Bird-led 'Tics teams and some very
      good and yes, some very bad) Patriots teams. Cleveland hasn't even
      gotten to the Big Dance in the last 30 years much less taken home
      the blue ribbon. 
63.476"yeah"AIMHI::KCUMMINGSTue Jan 03 1995 18:526
    
    
    Re:63.475
    
    
    What he said.....
63.477"careful"AIMHI::KCUMMINGSTue Jan 03 1995 18:533
    
    
    I guess I should have said what that note said..
63.478HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 19:0210
  Boston's biggest sports accomplishment in the last few years is the silver
medal that Kerrigan won during the Olympics. 

  Boston's only national level win in the last couple years was Kerrigan's 1st
place at the Nationals year before last. 

  Better rethink this "figure skating is not a sport" stuff. 

  :*)}
  George 
63.479How quickly they come...and go.SALEM::DODAGo Speed Racer, GO!Tue Jan 03 1995 19:133
Ah, memories of Swindell vs Clemens....

daryll
63.480Tommy, don't begrudge these Cleveland fans their memories...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 03 1995 19:167
    
    I was both alive and clearly and vividly remember The Drive, The Fumble,
    and the Good-Old-Fashioned-S^&%-Kicking-Behind-the-Woodshed ...
    
    glenn
    
    
63.481ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Feb 13 1995 17:278
    
    Rumors are that the Indians are close to signing Tom Gordon &
    Kent Mercker.
    
    Great moves - much better way to spend $ than taking a chance that
    Swift will be healthy, IMHO.
    
    Joe
63.482ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Feb 13 1995 18:478
63.483ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Feb 14 1995 11:0814
    
    It all depends upon how the bullpen comes together...
    
    The offense isn't going to get any better, but with luck shouldn't
    be any worse.
    
    The starting pitching has a chance, with the possible signings,
    to improve significantly.
    
    The bullpen does to, _but_ will Grover go w/ the young (and very
    good, IMHO) arms of Ogea & Lopez over half-baked vets?  Wettleland
    sure would look nice in the Tribe's bullpen...
    
    Joe
63.484Sox will rule the East Yanks will slip big timeAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Tue Feb 14 1995 11:365
    
    
     Nice try Joe but Wettleland is going to be a Sox.
    
    Jerry
63.485ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Feb 14 1995 17:484
    
    Possibly.  He'd still look great in the Tribe's bullpen, though... B^)
    
    Joe
63.486ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Mar 16 1995 12:3318
    
    Indians made a nice pick up yesterday, signing Gregg Olson (the
    one who pitches, not the one who catches) to a minor league
    contract yesterday.  Olson has a higher upside than most, if
    not all, of the other names that the Cleveland papers have named.
    Certainly Beck or Wetteland would be better, but at least Olson
    has been excellent when healthy, and isn't old enough to make that
    case too unlikely in the future.
    
    The Indians are also said to have Kent Mercker and Tom Gordon
    locked up.
    
    As much as I'm looking forward to replacement-ball, the Indians
    should have a really good team when the regulars return...
    
    And the replacements aren't doing too bad in their absence (9-6)...
    
    Joe
63.487HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Mar 16 1995 12:566
  Atlanta didn't have all that much luck with Gregg Olson last year. He had
an ERA around 9.5 and walked 13 guys in 12 innings.

  Any reason to believe that he's going to turn back into the old Gregg Olson?

  George
63.488ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Mar 16 1995 13:297
    
>  Any reason to believe that he's going to turn back into the old Gregg Olson?
    
    Not particularly, but given his age a recovery isn't out of the
    question.  And the Tribe's not out much if he doesn't...
    
    Joe
63.489ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu May 11 1995 11:3021
63.490only morons dump on a city they've never been toROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu May 11 1995 11:325
63.491MR1PST::THEKGB::MBROOKSThu May 11 1995 13:159
    Personally I would never Raise my Family in any city, and I hope to
    never have to work directly in one either (That major city's I dont
    consider a city Like MARLBORO as a major city, although I don't 
    think I'd want to Live there either).
    
    -1, been there seen it and really its not better or worse then boston
    just doenst have the history of boston... but then again no city does
    
    								mab
63.492Just curiousAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Wed May 17 1995 16:516
    
    
      Any Clevescum fans interested in a PNAME wager for this weekend
    series?
    
    Jerry
63.493CNTROL::CHILDSHarry Browne in 96Wed May 17 1995 17:002
    
    sure.............
63.494All the tribe has to do is splitAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Wed May 17 1995 18:197
    
    
    
       Seeing it is a 4 game series Sox have to win 3 for a week anything
    less than that and its a week.  If either team sweeps its two weeks.
    
    Jerry
63.495HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed May 17 1995 18:426
  I've tried parsing Note 63.494 in everything from English to FORTRAN but I
keep coming up empty. 

  What are you talking about?

  George
63.496CNTROL::CHILDSJJS the BucketsMasterWed May 17 1995 19:225
    
    what's left to say but you're on....but I'm generous 2-2 is a tie and
    no one wears a p-name of the other's choice............
    
    mike
63.497ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed May 17 1995 20:5812
63.498ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed May 17 1995 23:5310
    
    Just how many weeks do want to sign up for, Jerry?
    
    Count me in...
    
    And Paul, who's to say that working in Hudson with such a plethora
    of Indians fans hasn't rubbed off on Mike?  Maybe he'll even be
    rooting for the Cavs soon...
    
    Joe
63.499Sox should win 3AD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Thu May 18 1995 10:3810
    
    
    re George...
    
      Seems everyone got it but you.
    
      Two weeks for a sweep is fine Joe, Paul, Mike.  Is Paul the only one
    taking the odds thing.  Mike sees a split as split.
    
    jerry
63.500ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu May 18 1995 11:276
63.501CNTROL::CHILDSJJS the BucketsMasterThu May 18 1995 11:486
    
    Paul, I have rooted for the Indians for as long as I've been in the
    file. No bandwagon jumping for me. I blew off the soxs in the
    seventies when I became old enough to make my own choices.
    
    ;^)
63.502HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu May 18 1995 13:567
RE     <<< Note 63.499 by AD::HEATH "Pitchers and catchers report when???" >>>

>      Seems everyone got it but you.
    
  Everyone?

  George
63.503here we go againAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Thu May 18 1995 15:569
    
    
      Paul...
    
      I was refering to Mike taking a split as being even.  What I meant by
    odds was the 3 games to 1 for me to pin a pname on you.  If you want a
    month for a sweep so be it.
    
    Jerry
63.504btw, I'm reading The Great Crusade or Ike's favorite liesAKOCOA::BREENThu May 18 1995 16:076
    You know Eisenhower had the DDay invasion plan settled faster than you
    guys are getting this bet beteen division runner-ups down.
    
    But I'll tell you one thing, if there's a sweep it's the tribe being
    swept and you can pin "Rosemary Clooney sips" on me for a month if the
    opposite happens
63.505ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu May 18 1995 18:0113
    
>    You know Eisenhower had the DDay invasion plan settled faster than you
>    guys are getting this bet beteen division runner-ups down.
    
    OK, the Sox are more likely than not not going to finish above the
    Yankees this year.
    
    But just whom, pray tell, do you expect the Indians to finish behind?
    And will you back it up with the pname bet I offered?  The only team
    taken so far is the Yankees; if the Indians don't finish first in the
    Central someone else is going to have a better record...
    
    Joe
63.506ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu May 18 1995 18:2625
63.507AKOCOA::BREENThu May 18 1995 18:489
    well does that mean your taking my pname bet on the indians not
    sweeping?  I'm putting a lot up on that one cause ol' rc is one great
    babe.
    
    As an opinion I'd think you're dismissing the White Sox awful early
    what with some pure hitting out there to be bought if Reinsdorf
    chooses.  And Cleveland vs Redsox straight up for season record is a
    stretch with all the ifn maybes still connected to our pointed toward
    97 redsox.  See me for an ALC bet when they go head to head.
63.508ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu May 18 1995 19:4121
63.509ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu May 18 1995 19:4925
63.510CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westThu May 18 1995 19:516
63.511And Sele won't be in the weekend rotation but I'm a sportAKOCOA::BREENThu May 18 1995 19:584
    Okay, add me in opposite Joe Huber to make this even, since you're not
    going to make me mess with Rosemary
    
    Didn't Jim Thorpe play for Cleveland?
63.512ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu May 18 1995 20:014
63.513CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westThu May 18 1995 20:496
    
    Correct, but in your original statement you said that "either" team
    would sweep.  Whereas it is a 6.3% chance for each team.
    
    Marc
    
63.514ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu May 18 1995 20:584
63.515(8^)*PTOSS1::JACOBRPlaying with box the kids came in!Thu May 18 1995 23:269
    
    >>    my mistake... when my brain is going 90 mph
    
    Groaner, something that small definitely isn't safe at that speed, in
    fact, like the Corvair, it's UNSAFE AT ANY SPEED.  Please belt it in
    before it falls out your ear and blows away in the breeze.
    
    JaKe
    
63.516good one JaKeSUBPAC::SKALSKIFri May 19 1995 02:519
    
    
      re -1		Dooooooooooooooooooogh!
    
    
    		My icecream sangwich almost came outta my nose after
    	that one.
    
           					Shark
63.517ROCK::GRONOWSKISox rule, tribe sucks!Fri May 19 1995 10:5010
63.518ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri May 19 1995 11:1210
63.519ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri May 19 1995 11:133
63.520Still I wonder if Eshelman is for realAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Fri May 19 1995 12:0510
    
    
    
      Sox take game 1 on an 8th inning blast from Mcfarlane.  Didn't 
    have to good of a feeling about this game when Pierce game in
    followed by Lilliquist.  But Belinda got it done and Mcfarlane
    added his 2 game winning HR of the year.  Clark and Smith tonight
    should be a good match up.
    
    Jerry
63.521ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri May 19 1995 12:174
63.522RE: .518IMBETR::DUPREZFri May 19 1995 12:3714
Don't feel too bad about trading Mlicki - the guy never really did much.
Two wins does not a career make.

Now trading him and someone else for an *outfielder* - that's another matter.
The Tribe are *loaded* in the outfield - if they wanted a little depth, they
could have signed any of a number of free agents on the cheap.  And depth is
what Burnitz is - he won't be pushing Belle, Lofton, or Ramirez out of a job
anytime soon.  (Although I haven't seen much of Ramirez's fielding - I hear
it's not Gold Glove caliber...)

You're right, though - Lewis for Costo was totally useless.

Roland
63.523SALEM::DODAKids, don't try this at home...Fri May 19 1995 13:229
My b-i-l lives in Baltimore and the papers down there are 
blasting the Orioles for letting a prospect like Eshelman go.
The team response is that they have plenty of prospects and 
couldn't keep all of em. Problem is, he's a lefty and even they 
admit they're lefty prospects are thin.

Nice move DQ.

daryll
63.524ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri May 19 1995 13:556
63.525ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sat May 20 1995 02:3110
63.526that one hurtAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Sat May 20 1995 13:563
    
    
    Ryan sucks.  Will never amount to a reliable closer.
63.527ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sat May 20 1995 22:278
63.528ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun May 21 1995 22:516
63.529ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon May 22 1995 13:046
    
    Expecting something of a White Sox surge...
    
    September 22nd, clinch w/ a Tribe win.
    
    Joe
63.530HELIX::MAIEWSKITue May 23 1995 14:183
  Can we have a look at their schedule for the last 2 weeks?

  George
63.531ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue May 23 1995 20:5648
63.532HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed May 24 1995 13:144
  Ok, Sep 26 -- at Minnesota, the Indians will beat the "Twinkies" to win the
division. 

  George
63.533ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue May 30 1995 12:0811
63.534It will cost them but how much?AD::HEATHRed Sox suck Tribe roooooolsTue May 30 1995 13:077
    
    
       Paul...
    
      How many times can the Tribe come back in the late innings?
    
    Jerry
63.535Changes for Tribe?CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Tue May 30 1995 13:117
    Paul,
    Gammons wrote Sunday that the Tribe is seriously thinking of starting
    Tavarez and another kid and kicking Clark and Black out of the
    rotation. 
    Your wish may come true.
    
    Mike
63.536ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue May 30 1995 13:1318
    
    While Ogea or Tavarez are better than Grimsley, Grimsley's no stiff.
    He does need to be used w/ care - he can't go over 100 pitches and
    come back strong - but he can pitch.  The real problem is that Hargrove
    seems to think a lefty starter is necessary, rather than just nice to
    have if you've got one.  A starting staff of Nagy, Martinez, Hershiser,
    Tavarez, and Ogea, with Clark coming back once he's regained his 
    effectiveness in Buffalo, would be fine.  Assenmacher, Poole, and Plunk
    provide nice support for Mesa (who's really surprised me - as a starter
    he was a stiff, as a reliever he's been quite good) in the bullpen...
    
    Meanwhile Ramirez is the MVP-to-this-point, and with help from Thome &
    Sorrento & Baerga has made the relatively poor starts by Belle & Lofton
    hurt less.
    
    It's going to be a fun season...
    
    Joe
63.537ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue May 30 1995 13:166
    
    ] How many times can the Tribe come back in the late innings?
    
    Probably about as many as they can build an early lead.
    
    Joe
63.538ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue May 30 1995 15:1611
63.539ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue May 30 1995 15:173
63.540HELIX::MAIEWSKITue May 30 1995 15:173
  Isn't that because Cleveland has more seats than the Red Sox?

  George
63.541ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue May 30 1995 15:206
63.542Are they calling it spirit of '54 or '48?AKOCOA::BREENIndians rule,sox sip; Phillip is sixTue May 30 1995 15:5710
    When's the last time the Indians outdrew the redsox - 59?, 66?  Last
    year doesn't count.
    
    I was interested in the tribe but they're about 3 years behind
    schedule.  I still question the pitching but perhaps there's no one to
    challenge them except KC if they get going.  I don't know what's going
    on with chi-sox, you tell me.
    
    Good luck Indians, you'll have to do it without me but it's a long way
    to tipperary.
63.543SALEM::DODAChairman of the BoredTue May 30 1995 16:071
Benes has been getting pounded regularly hasn't he?
63.544HELIX::MAIEWSKITue May 30 1995 16:448
           <<< Note 63.543 by SALEM::DODA "Chairman of the Bored" >>>

>Benes has been getting pounded regularly hasn't he?

   Name      ERA   W L  SV   IP    H  BB SO  ER  HR  G  GS  CG  GF   SH
Andy Benes  5.625  0 4  0   32.0  40  12 30  20   5  6   6   0   0    0 

  George
63.545AKEEM::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue May 30 1995 16:519
    
    >When's the last time the Indians outdrew the redsox - 59?, 66?  Last
    >year doesn't count.
    
    What a joke!
    
    When is the last time the Red Sox won the World Series, none of the
    championships prior to 1919 count.
    
63.546HELIX::MAIEWSKITue May 30 1995 16:529
Re    <<< Note 63.545 by AKEEM::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>

>    When is the last time the Red Sox won the World Series, none of the
>    championships prior to 1919 count.
    
  When was the last time the Indians won the Series? Championships prior to
1949 don't count.

  George
63.547AKEEM::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue May 30 1995 16:534
    
    George, have a clue pal.  Cleveland's going all the way this year and
    Boston AIN'T!  Bottom line, the Sox will not win a WS championship
    before the Indians!
63.548PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneTue May 30 1995 17:0012
    >>Boston AIN'T!  Bottom line, the Sox will not win a WS championship
    >>before the Indians!
    
    
    Hey Groaner, you should find someone to bet on that lasted line, there.
    Only problem is, neither of ya would be alive to see who wins!!!!
    
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    
    JaKe
    
63.549HELIX::MAIEWSKITue May 30 1995 17:0514
RE    <<< Note 63.547 by AKEEM::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>

>    George, have a clue pal.  Cleveland's going all the way this year and
>    Boston AIN'T!  Bottom line, the Sox will not win a WS championship
>    before the Indians!

  Maybe and maybe not. Just about everyone was saying back around 1991 that
Atlanta was going all the way but Braves fans are still holding their breath.
They came real close staying alive past game 6 against the Twins then staying
alive past 9 innings of game 7, about as close as you can get but no cigar. 

  Baseball's a funny game. As Yogi says ... 

  George 
63.550heard this about Benes recently...USCTR1::GARBARINOTue May 30 1995 17:323
Some scout was quoted recently as saying that SD's front office is
convinced that Benes is no more than a #3, and an innings horse...gives
up lots of hits.
63.551ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue May 30 1995 17:3911
63.552USCTR1::GARBARINOTue May 30 1995 18:077
>    there as the #4 or Bud Black?

I can't believe Black is on any ML roster.

Has Cleveland had any serious injuries yet ?  Given the way they're
dropping around MLB, it's bound to get them sooner or later.  Tough
to get too excited when we're not even 20% into the season yet....
63.553"No More Dead Last!!!..."HELIX::MAIEWSKITue May 30 1995 18:2710
RE                    <<< Note 63.552 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>Has Cleveland had any serious injuries yet ?  Given the way they're
>dropping around MLB, it's bound to get them sooner or later.  Tough
>to get too excited when we're not even 20% into the season yet....

  Indian fans get excited at the prospect of winning over 60 games per year
which looks pretty good at this point. 

  George
63.554ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue May 30 1995 18:395
63.555HELIX::MAIEWSKITue May 30 1995 18:5020
  I agree that on paper the Indians are the best team in the A.L. but it's
a long road from being the best team going in to June and winning the World
Series. To get into the playoffs they have to:

   - avoid injuries through June, July, Aug, Sept.
   - avoid protracted hitting slumps.
   - not get overtaken by some hot team in their division with a knack for
       winning 1 run games down the stretch.

  Once in the playoffs, they have to have some luck to avoid getting knocked
off by one of the other division winners or the wild card. If they accomplish
all that, then they have to go head to head against the N.L. champion who
unlike the other A.L. teams may well be as good as them on paper. 

  It's not like basketball or hockey where the stronger team almost always wins
a 7 game series. Two or three untimely slumps and/or sore elbows and a ball
that just won't drop on the right side of the foul line and suddenly the best
team loses a playoff in 5 or 6 games. 

  George 
63.556WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!!Tue May 30 1995 18:5620
    
    
        Don't know why I'm doing this but!!!
    
              Groaner if the Yanks are healthy, they are the best team in
    the AL! Cleveland might have the best hitting team in baseball but
    after Nagy Cleveland's pitchers don't scare anyone! Jose Mesa is a 
    Ken Ryan Closer clone! 
    
         In a 7 game series I'd bet the farm on the Yanks with a healthy
    Key, Mcdowell, Perez, Kam, Hitchcock, Wetteland, Howe and Wickman over
    Nagy, Martinez (40) Hershiser (?) Black, Tavarez, Assenmacher and Mesa.
    
         With that Pitching staff of yours I wouldn't get fitted for the
    ring yet!
    
         Remember it's only May and Pennants are not won in May!
    
    
    Chap
63.557SALEM::DODAChairman of the BoredTue May 30 1995 19:013
Oh for the glory years of Greg Swindell.....

daryll
63.558USCTR1::GARBARINOTue May 30 1995 19:101
and just last year Cleveland was 0-9 vs. NY
63.559WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!!Tue May 30 1995 19:153
    
    
    0-13 before they beat us 1 game so far this year???
63.560ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue May 30 1995 20:069
63.561ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed May 31 1995 11:3010
63.562WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!!Wed May 31 1995 12:2910
    
    
         And I told you I'd bet on who goes to the series not on regular
    season records! Unlike Cleveland the Yankees have won a few
    championships (22) and regular season champs don't mean as much. 
    
    
         So put your P'name where your mouth is!
    
    chap
63.563ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed May 31 1995 13:517
    
    OK, Chappy, how about this...
    
    I'll bet you one week of pname for who has the better regular
    season record & one week for who goes further in the post season.
    
    Joe
63.564USCTR1::GARBARINOWed May 31 1995 14:025
>    I'll bet you one week of pname for who has the better regular
>    season record & one week for who goes further in the post season.

don't bite Chap...hold out for the AL pennant winner...with Cleveland
the odds are in your favor....
63.565WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!!Wed May 31 1995 14:2110
    
    
       Another Front runner heard from?
    
    
       Nope it's the pennant or nuttin! whatsamatta Indian fans no
    confidence in your rattlesnake bitten team?
    
    
    chap
63.566Definate favoritesCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Wed May 31 1995 14:438
    The Yankees led by Donny Baseball, Wade Boggs and Jack MacDowell are so
    far superior to any other AL team that it's sickening. Red Sox and all
    other AL teams fans should be content right now if there team comes in
    second to the mighty Bronx Bombers. All Hail King George.
    
    :^)
    
    Mike
63.567Must be all THOSE YANKEE PLAYERS ON YOUR ROTIS TEAMWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!!Wed May 31 1995 14:505
    
    
        Mike,
    
          I knew you'd come around!!
63.568ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed May 31 1995 14:5616
    
>    Another Front runner heard from?
    
    Yup, that's right, I certainly have _never_ rooted for the Tribe before
    this year... B^)
    
>    Nope it's the pennant or nuttin! whatsamatta Indian fans no
>    confidence in your rattlesnake bitten team?
    
    Sorry, I thought who went farther in the post season was what you
    wanted.
    
    OK, then, a week for regular season record & one week for the pennant,
    then.
    
    Joe
63.569WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!!Wed May 31 1995 14:587
    
    
        I don't want anything to do with a regular season bet. It's like
    getting your second choice to go to the prom with you!
    
    
    chap
63.570HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed May 31 1995 15:098
  Well actually, 2nd choice for the prom is probably someone pretty good.
Regular season is more like getting stuck taking someone assigned to you by the
Guidance Counselor. 

  Although I will say that I was grateful for the efforts of Mrs. Bottlefry on
my behalf.

  George
63.571WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!!Wed May 31 1995 15:128
    
    
        BTW Joe I know you are an Indian fan but I was corresponding with
    mr groaner and thats why I called you another front runner. I know you
    wouldn't have took this bet last year?
    
    
    chap
63.572It is Prom SeasonCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Wed May 31 1995 15:1512
     >>  I don't want anything to do with a regular season bet. It's like
     >>  getting your second choice to go to the prom with you!
    
    
     >> chap
    
    Chap,
    Any personal stories you'd like to share with us? I heard your second
    choice was one of your cousins? Not that I'd believe that.
    
    :^)
    Mike
63.573Indian fans, whewAKOCOA::BREENWed May 31 1995 15:177
    How come you make attendance statements and when someone compares the
    last 25 years you then retreat to 1948, the great Cleveland lighthouse
    in the sea of futility (with a few buoys called All America conference
    championships).
    
    And I suppose if the Indians fold you'll trot down the freeway to
    neighboring Kansas City to root for the Royals.
63.574ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed May 31 1995 15:3417
    
    Chappy,
    
    OK; I was willing to take your bet if you were willing to take mine,
    but if you'd prefer neither...
    
>    BTW Joe I know you are an Indian fan but I was corresponding with
>    mr groaner and thats why I called you another front runner. I know you
>    wouldn't have took this bet last year?
    
    It would have depended upon what mood you caught me in last year.
    Last year, the Tribe had significantly worse pitching, and was less
    willing to go with young pitchers.  They've improved this year, and
    are (along w/ the Yankees) one of the best teams in baseball this 
    year.
    
    Joe
63.575WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!!Wed May 31 1995 15:455
    
    
    
         I agree the Tribe is very strong. Just with groaner making them
    out to be the 27 Yanks someone had to try and shut him up!
63.576all they have to do is win 110 gmsOLD1S::CADZILLA2fifty lashes with a gui iconWed May 31 1995 15:502
    
    
63.577ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed May 31 1995 17:286
    
    In 144 games?
    
    I'll be quite happy w/ 100...
    
    Joe
63.578ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed May 31 1995 19:286
63.579ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed May 31 1995 19:294
63.580HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed May 31 1995 19:374
  No I don't think so. As I recall the Cincinnati Redstockings were undefeated
back around 1869.

  George
63.581ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 01 1995 11:0316
63.582SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Thu Jun 01 1995 13:185
    
    	Which team has the biggest division lead in all of baseball? 
    :^)
    
    Ron
63.583ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 01 1995 13:4026
63.584IMBETR::DUPREZThu Jun 01 1995 13:5116
    
>    AL Central Race:
    
>                 W   L   GB
>    Cleveland   21   9   --
>    Chicago     11  19   10
>    Eliminated:
>    Milwaukee
>    Minnesota
>    Kansas City

I have no doubt that Cleveland will take the division, but how
did KC get eliminated while Chicago is still alive?  Is this the
advent of GroanerMath?  :-)

Roland
63.585HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 01 1995 13:5110
RE    <<< Note 63.583 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>

>    Exactly, anything less than a WS ring for the sox is a choke.  
    
  Which Sox are you talking about? I don't think either the Red Sox or White
Sox are in a position where losing would be a choke. Both have some fine
players and could make the playoffs if they got/stayed healthy but neither
is a lock.

  George
63.586USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jun 01 1995 14:097
>RE    <<< Note 63.583 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>

>    Exactly, anything less than a WS ring for the sox is a choke.  


By the chest-thumping going on in here, I think the same HAS TO BE said
for the Indians...
63.587Kinda like saying Ken Ryan had a helluva save yesterdayAD::HEATHBill Buckner my heroThu Jun 01 1995 14:144
    
    
     Yup gotta agree with ya Paul.... 3 come from behind victories
    is without a doubt a sound thrashing.
63.588MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Jun 01 1995 14:2710
     Po' po' Groaner. On that vicious cycle again. You could tell
    the seasons by him. If he's celebrating about the Indians then
    it must be Spring. If he's quiet or dejected about the Indians 
    then it is surely early Fall. If he's happy about the Browns then
    it's still Fall but if he's bummed then Winter has set in. The
    Cavs take over after the Browns and carry Groaner through the 
    Winter only to bum him out in the Spring when the Indians take
    over and start the whole vicious cycle all over again. 
    
63.589SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Thu Jun 01 1995 14:472
    
    	Anything less then the Tribe winning the WS is a choke job...
63.590HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 01 1995 15:039
  I don't really agree with that either. I'd say they are favored to win
the American League but in baseball the margin between teams is very small
so a bit of bad luck can take any time out of a 7 game series.

  And if they do win the American League their chances of winning the series
will probably be about even. There are teams in the N.L. that are easily as
good as the Indians.

  George
63.591ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 01 1995 15:045
63.592ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 01 1995 15:044
63.593HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 01 1995 15:108
  I'd say that the Indians versus the Braves would be an even series. In post
season experience seems to count and the Braves have several players who come
alive in the fall. 

  Beyond that I'd say the Expos, or Reds would give them an even fight. I'm not
sure yet that the Phillies, or Cubs are for real. 

  George
63.594MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Jun 01 1995 15:147
    
  >> p.s. nice pname, 

     Yes, Groaner. And for you the dream is always the same - a Cleveland 
     team has won a title. Unfortunately for you, the reality is always
     the same, too. The forty year losing streak continues.
    
63.595ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 01 1995 15:373
63.596The first pennant race of their livesAKOCOA::BREENThu Jun 01 1995 15:5114
    Tommy,
    	According to Groaner it's only 30 years since he counts the '64
    Browns nfl victory which was pre-super bowl.
    
    	The current wagon he's hitched to is very familiar to redsox fans
    as it shows good hitting but questionable pitching.  The other unknown
    is how the indians can do under pressure since none of the 59 team is
    still around except Herb Score in the announcer's booth.
    
    	Now the tribe fans can take a hit on the sox fans by pointing out
    that 2 of the 3 division winners in the last 10 years didn't make the
    world series.  We can't critize them back, no material.
    
    billte
63.597ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 01 1995 16:517
63.598ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 01 1995 16:567
63.599PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneThu Jun 01 1995 16:5734
    
    >><<< Note 63.592 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>

    
    >>Which teams in the NL are easily as good as the Indians.  Several of
    >>the players in preseason on the top NL teams were in awe of the talent
    >>on the Indians - including players from Montreal and Atlanta.

    Ooooooooohhh!!!  By Clevescum logic, as we see from HAL every year,
    this means that they're  lock to win it all, then, right??
    
    Who gives two good sh_ts if someone was in awe of them, especially
    Montreal.  Lasted time I checked, Montreal held a garage sale over the
    winter and is slightly above a AAA team right now(although the Pirates
    are a AA team right now).
    
    Ya know Groaner, it musta been something in the air that fouled up the
    miniscule brains younzes got and made ya count yer chickens early in
    the season and then head for a bridge late in the season.  A 4-1/2 game
    lead in yer division(or whatever it is today) in late May or early June
    don'/t mean skwat when it comes to who's still around in the end of
    September.
    
    the only way to increase the IQ of a Clevescumite is to remove their
    complete brain(a delicate procedure knowing how small it is in a head
    filled with cow manure).
    
    JMHO
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
    
63.600HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 01 1995 17:259
RE                      <<< Note 63.596 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    	According to Groaner it's only 30 years since he counts the '64
>    Browns nfl victory which was pre-super bowl.

  Wasn't that the game where Lou Groza kicked the phantom field goal in the
blizzard which everyone but the ref said was wide?
    
  George
63.601USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jun 01 1995 17:505
>    	According to Groaner it's only 30 years since he counts the '64
>    Browns nfl victory which was pre-super bowl.

Hey, those titles count !  The Pack leads with 11 NFL titles, and 9 of 'em
came pre-SB...spread out throughout the league's history.
63.602HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 01 1995 18:096
  I'm with the Indian fans on this. Those old NFL titles are legitimate. 

  Of course if you count NBA and NHL titles, Boston pulls way ahead of
Cleveland. 

  George
63.603IMBETR::DUPREZThu Jun 01 1995 18:255
>    p.s. Its pretty sad when I can safely declare that I've been to more
>    Indians games in person over the past 10 years that probably 75% of
>    the so called Red Sox fans in this notesfile.

If they're Red Sox fans, why would they want to go to Indians games?  :-)
63.604Mo, go ahead and do those charity events, you've earned itAKOCOA::BREENThu Jun 01 1995 20:4416
    By the way I picked up the book "Cobb" by Al Stump and it's great.It
    mentions Cleaveland winning a pennant with Tris Speaker managing.  I
    don't know how they did in the series (1920?) but youse tribe fanatics
    may as well jump on it.
    
    I went to a sox game in '93 with my cousin who picked up cheap rf
    grandstand family day seats and saw Ripken and the Orioles.  There must
    have been another visit from '85 on but I can't recall it.
    
    But then again I find I can manage the sox perfectly well from the
    occasional box score and the odd inning or two on channel 38.  I can
    tell you that Alicia is the key to 20-10 and Vaughn has his head back
    on straight in the field and I take back all the nasty things I posted
    during the long cold winter about good ol' Mo.
    
    billtg
63.605HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 01 1995 21:1514
RE                      <<< Note 63.604 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    By the way I picked up the book "Cobb" by Al Stump and it's great.It
>    mentions Cleaveland winning a pennant with Tris Speaker managing.  I
>    don't know how they did in the series (1920?) but youse tribe fanatics
>    may as well jump on it.
    
  Well I'm hardly a tribe fanatic but according to my baseball wall chart, the
Indians won in 1920 defeating the Dodgers. That season Star SS Ray Chapman was
killed by a ball pitched by Carl Mays. Bill Wambsganss recorded an unassisted
triple play during the World Series. That Dodger team was the one that was
involved the 26 inning game earlier that year. 

  George 
63.606ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 11:3633
63.607I'd still take Vaughn for the ave/ob %AD::HEATHBill Buckner my heroFri Jun 02 1995 12:133
    
    
      Valentin over Vizquel in a NY minute.
63.608ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 12:356
63.609ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 02 1995 12:358
    
>      Valentin over Vizquel in a NY minute.
    
    And Vaughn over Sorrento, and McFarlane over Pena.
    
    Looking at the other six positions, though...
    
    Joe
63.610ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 12:364
63.611ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 02 1995 12:3710
    
>    I'm talking overall here Jerry, Omar is the #1 defensive shortstop
>    in the AL and probably in baseball.  With this line-up, I'll take
>    his lower SLG% and more SBs and better D over Valentin.  Omar can
>    bunt and move runners over too, JV just goes for the jack.
    
    Jerry probably is too; Valentin's defense is on par with Vizquel's,
    even if it doesn't look as flashy...
    
    Joe
63.612ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 12:392
63.613ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 02 1995 12:556
    
    OK, then, can you explain why, consistently over his career, Valentin 
    has turned a higher percentage of balls hit into his area into
    outs than Vizquel?
    
    Joe
63.614Valentin's the real V-man...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Jun 02 1995 13:3714
>    I'm talking overall here Jerry, Omar is the #1 defensive shortstop
>    in the AL and probably in baseball.  With this line-up, I'll take
>    his lower SLG% and more SBs and better D over Valentin.  Omar can
>    bunt and move runners over too, JV just goes for the jack.
    
    ...and gets it (all or The Wall) often enough.  But why take two 
    bases or more when you can bunt?
    
    Tribe fans arguing amongst each other... the Apocalypse is near...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.615HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 02 1995 13:5218
  Valentin v. Vizquel is no contest. Take a look at their numbers as of Week 4.

                      G  AB   R   H  TB  D  T HR RBI  BB  SO  SB CS  E
John Valentin        28 106  25  32  60  8  1  6  20  24  18   4  1  2
Omar Vizquel         27 114  20  26  38  3  0  3  13  11  13   4  1  2

  For Valentin that works out to 26.45 Runs Created using the Bill James
Runs Created formula against 11.85 for Vizquel and 9.52 Runs Created per
game for Valentin versus 3.594 for Vizquel. As for defense, the addition runs
allowed by Valentin, if any, would be far fewer than the extra runs he
generates. 

  Valentin is unchallenged as the best short stop in the American League. He's
solid on defense and no one else comes close to his offensive stats. The only
short stop in the majors who comes out better in generating offense is Barry
Larkin.

  George
63.616ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 14:1513
63.617THE FUTURE IS HERE!!!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!!Fri Jun 02 1995 14:203
    
    
    DEREK JETER > JOHN VALENTIN > OMAR VIZQUEL
63.618greenwell is heading for japan, somewhere he can put up decent numbersROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 14:2712
63.619The old Groaner double standardMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jun 02 1995 14:286
    
  >> Okay George, so you're rating players based on 28 games...  
 
      This from the guy who has teams conceding the race to Cleveland
      already. 
    
63.620HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 02 1995 14:4014
RE    <<< Note 63.616 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>

>    Okay George, so you're rating players based on 28 games...  Why not
>    trade me Kirby Puckett .241 for Matt Mieske .294 in BNBAL.

  Ok, how about last year.

       Name            Rc      Rcg   gms   avr    Ab   Ht   Hr   
    John Valentin    61.011   7.958   84  0.316  301   95    9
    Omar Vizquel     31.898   4.062   69  0.273  286   78    1

  Did Vizquel really save 4 runs a game more than Valentin on defense?

  George
63.621ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 02 1995 14:4610
    
>  Did Vizquel really save 4 runs a game more than Valentin on defense?
    
    Actually, FWIW, he wouldn't have had to - the 4 run/game difference
    is for teams made up completely of Valentins or Vizquels.  The
    actual difference, offerensively, was 4/9.  Vizquel would have
    had to save 4/9 of a run a game more than Valentin on average
    to be equal.
    
    Joe
63.622ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 15:064
63.623HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 02 1995 15:1316
       <<< Note 63.621 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>Vizquel would have
>    had to save 4/9 of a run a game more than Valentin on average
>    to be equal.

  That comes to one run every other game. Is there really that big a difference
on defense? 

  Looking at their Runs Created numbers of 61 and 32 respectively which is not
based on a team of one guy but is an estimate of the number of runs they add to
the team. Valintin would have had to have been responsible for allowing 29 more
runs than Vizquel over the season for defense to have made a difference. Is
Vizquel that much better than Valintin on defense?

  George
63.624ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 02 1995 15:2133
    
>>    Vizquel would have
>>    had to save 4/9 of a run a game more than Valentin on average
>>    to be equal.

>That comes to one run every other game. Is there really that big a difference
>on defense? 

    Can there be?  Yes.  See Ozzie Smith.
    
    Is there?  I _really_ _really_ doubt it.
    
    That said, a 1/2 a game saved _is_ worth more to the Indians than
    1/2 a game scored, so Vizquel's defense wouldn't even have to be
    that much better.
    
    Of course, IMHO Vizquel's defense isn't better, so it's irrelevant.
    
>Looking at their Runs Created numbers of 61 and 32 respectively which is not
>based on a team of one guy but is an estimate of the number of runs they add to
>the team. Valintin would have had to have been responsible for allowing 29 more
>runs than Vizquel over the season for defense to have made a difference. Is
>Vizquel that much better than Valintin on defense?
    
    OK, that's the same thing as the 4/9 of a run/game.
    
    And the best answer I can see is that, Vizquel isn't that much better
    than John Valentin defensively.  Statistically, Valentin's actually
    superior (using Defensive Average); even given the flaws of that
    statistic, I doubt Vizquel comes out _better_.
    
    
    Joe
63.625Vizquel == MOP == Massively Overrated PlayerEDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Jun 02 1995 17:001
    
63.626Mo Vaughn == MOP == Massively Overrated PlayerROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 17:251
63.627Roger Clemens = = MOP == Massively Overrated PlayerROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 17:251
63.628ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 17:265
63.629He's right...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Jun 02 1995 17:3310
                                            
>    Clemens claimed in an in parts of an interview shown on ESPN last night
>    that if the Sox win it all this year, he'll retire.  He also claims 
>    that he's a guarentee for the HOF even if he retires after this year.
>    He's dreaming.
    
    That's one dream that is already certain to come true...
    
    glenn
    
63.630BIGQ::MCKAYFri Jun 02 1995 17:363
    Clemens is an absolute lock for the HOF.  Wake up Iceman your dreaming
    
    Jimbo
63.631SALEM::DODAChairman of the BoredFri Jun 02 1995 17:583
Clemens is in. You're thinking of Joe Charboneau....

daryll
63.632Groaner==MON==Massively Obnoxious NoterPTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneFri Jun 02 1995 18:223
    
    JaKe
    
63.633Tribe==MOT==Massively Overrated TeamSNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Fri Jun 02 1995 19:043
    
    	Cleveland Indians === MOT === Massively Overrated Team
    
63.634ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 19:504
63.635He's a blow hard he won't retire. Unless Omar stops making uni's big enufAD::HEATHBill Buckner my heroFri Jun 02 1995 20:034
    
    
      Paul take a look at his winning percentage.  It is up there with
    Kofax and Drysdale.
63.636ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 20:053
63.637ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 02 1995 22:124
63.638ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Jun 04 1995 21:0112
63.639ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Jun 04 1995 21:028
63.641ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Jun 05 1995 10:528
63.642ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Jun 05 1995 10:5722
63.643todd van poppel up to 94 mph on the gunROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Jun 05 1995 10:584
63.644ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Jun 05 1995 11:3316
63.645rogers only way in is having known Oil CanROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Jun 05 1995 11:346
63.646ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 05 1995 12:447
    
    Well, I still think Grimsley _isn't_ a stiff, though right now he
    belongs in Buffalo w/ Mark Clark.  When they start throwing strikes
    consistently, bring 'em back, but until then they don't belong in
    the majors.
    
    Joe
63.647HTHEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jun 05 1995 13:4314
>    Attention Mike Hargrove, if you read this, have a clue.
    
    Butch Hobson is available...
    
>    I think Roger's post season record will guarentee him a spot
>    in the HoF.  Highest winning percentage pitcher to have no
>    wins in post season.
 
    Obviously this statement took a trip through the HeiserFactFilter (tm).
    You must have Roger confused with Bob Feller...   
    
    glenn
    
63.648burnitz is a stiff, so is grimsleyROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Jun 05 1995 18:358
63.649Of cours I have '78 and '74 to look back onAKOCOA::BREENThere are 7 conspiracies, the 1st of which is realityMon Jun 05 1995 19:389
    I have to agree with Groaner on Clemens needing more wins and even post
    season accomplishment to get in the hof.
    
    Unfortunately on the other side, euphoria for the home team is nice but
    nowadays noone considers any success short of world series victory and
    even after a pennant that's still a long road to climb.
    
    And finally why are you shorting Kansas City?  I'd be confident in your
    shoes but no where near certain.
63.650ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Jun 05 1995 20:146
63.651ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 05 1995 20:1927
    
>    I have to agree with Groaner on Clemens needing more wins and even post
>    season accomplishment to get in the hof.
    
    I disagree - when a pitcher is marginal, such as Nolan Ryan, career
    length matters.  For a pitcher like Clemens or a hitter like Bonds,
    a shorter career shouldn't be a deterent.
    
>    And finally why are you shorting Kansas City?  I'd be confident in your
>    shoes but no where near certain.
    
    Why?  In order:
    
    Coleman
    Goodwin
    Joyner
    Gaetti
    Gagne
    Mayne/Borders
    Hiatt
    Nunnally
    Lind/Randa/Stynes
    Hamelin
    
    As good as Appier is, there's no way he makes up for these guys...
    
    Joe
63.652SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Mon Jun 05 1995 21:1816
    
    	When looking at who should or shouldn't be in the HOF. You should
    look at a players stats for his era. From 1984 (?) until Roger retires.
    During that time span who was better? I don't think a pitcher should
    need 300 wins to get into the HOF. If a pitcher pitches 22 years and
    gets 300 wins (300/22=13.6 wins per year). Its the same as a pitcher
    deciding to only play for 15 years (15*14=210 wins) and getting 210
    wins.
    	Todays players make so much more money then previous players. A
    Roger Clemens doesn't need the money, so why play the extra 7-10 years?
    Roger also attended college and didn't make it to the Majors until he
    was 22/23 years old. So 15 year career would make him 38 years old. He
    can retire and watch his kids entire high school careers. If they
    choose to participate in sports.
    
    Ron
63.653ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 06 1995 11:238
63.654ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 06 1995 11:234
63.655SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Tue Jun 06 1995 12:5721
    
    	Yes, Roger is only around 175 wins at the moment. He has only
    played 11/12 seasons. IF he plays another 3/4 years and gets another
    50 wins giving him about 225 wins. That would be an average of 15 wins
    a season over a 15 year career. Which would then be legitimate HOF
    numbers.
    	I'm not saying that Roger is playing just for the money. You have
    to look at the economic era's. Players in the '40s, '50's, and 60's
    got jobs in the off season and made well under 100k. Todays players
    average over 1 million a season. With a player like Roger getting
    4/5 million a season. Roger probably made less then 1 million a season
    his first 3 years in the Majors. I'd say over Rogers career he has
    probably made about 25/30 million in salary alone. Never mind
    endorsements. So I believe that today's high salaries. Will contribute
    to shorter careers. Players aren't going to give it that extra 3 years
    anymore.
    	If Roger gave it an extra 3 years past say 15 years to give him
    18 seasons. He would then be close to 300 wins. Once you get close to
    300 wins. Players tend to hold on to try and get the 300.
    
    Ron
63.656USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jun 06 1995 13:5111
>    KC has a solid team, Cleveland is a lock for the playoffs, and I doubt
>    KC has enough to catch them for the division.

This is crazy.  Each team has 109 games to play, and only 5 games separating
them.  In baseball, 2-8 and 9-1 over their last 10 is VERY common.  I don't
think KC is a real good team, but injuries and hitting and pitching slumps
are waiting for Cleveland.  Anything can happen, and usually does.

I know Cleveland has hardly ever had a contender, and you're a little
excited, but I'd think your experiences over the years would have you
a little more humble and cautious.
63.657CNTROL::CHILDSJJS the BucketsMasterTue Jun 06 1995 14:028
    
    I'm with Paul, Cleveland's a lock. They were right there last year
    only to have the rug pulled out from under them. They're hungry and
    their pitching has improved. 
    
    NY on the other hand seems to be suffering from high expectations.
    
    mike
63.658ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 06 1995 14:1610
63.659Cleveland in great shape; 1994-vintage Yankees aging fastEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jun 06 1995 14:2119
>    I'm with Paul, Cleveland's a lock. They were right there last year
>    only to have the rug pulled out from under them. They're hungry and
>    their pitching has improved. 
    
    Yes, Cleveland has the talent and the great start; they look like a
    lock.  The gap between Cleveland and KC will only widen over 110+
    games.  Paul is right that the only serious potential challenger is 
    Chicago, if and when they get their act together.
    
>    NY on the other hand seems to be suffering from high expectations.
    
    Who knows; the shortterm window of opportunity may have closed on the 
    Yankees.  Wouldn't that be a shame.  There is some advancing age 
    and/or terminal injury problems on this team with key players like Key,
    Tartabull, Boggs, Mattingly and a bunch of good role players in the
    31-32 range.  There's talent in the system but maybe based around the 
    current core of players, last year was the peak.  Still a long way to 
    go, though.  
63.660ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 06 1995 14:2321
63.661Contrast and compare with the greats already in...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jun 06 1995 14:3215
           
> I stated, that in my opinion, the Hall of Fame statement was
> false.  If Clemens plays enough games to get 225 wins, then he has
> a reasonable shot at the HoF, but would not be a lock.
    
    Grab some clue, Paul.  The only way that a pitcher like Clemens who
    already has roughly 175 wins, a .650 lifetime winning percentage, and 
    a 2.90 career ERA _doesn't_ get into the Hall of Fame with 225 wins
    is if he somehow manages to lose another 100 games while compiling 
    those 50 wins.  If Clemens finishes up 50-50 he'd still have a lifetime
    winning percentage of over .600.  That aren't many of those at over 200
    wins...
    
    glenn
    
63.662Oh, I guess there was one year they made JulyAKOCOA::BREENTue Jun 06 1995 14:427
    Joe,
    	Indian fans don't have any experience to make them humble; they've
    been out of the races by memorial day since 1960.  I wouldn't wish a
    good ol' fashioned "Boston" collapse on anyone but it sure teaches you
    the virtue of skepticism.
    
    	Groaner certainly isn't sandbagg'n.
63.663ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 06 1995 14:4910
    
>    	Indian fans don't have any experience to make them humble; they've
>    been out of the races by memorial day since 1960.  I wouldn't wish a
>    good ol' fashioned "Boston" collapse on anyone but it sure teaches you
>    the virtue of skepticism.
    
    Well, that all depends - if they are Browns fans & Cavs fans as well,
    they've got plenty built up...
    
    Joe
63.664HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 06 1995 14:5340
RE    <<< Note 63.653 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>

>well, Jack Morris put
>    up some good numbers and won the World Series, Dave Stewart put
>    up some good numbers and won the World Series... yet none of those
>    3 including Roger deserve the hall of fame at this point.

  Clemens did what he had to do to win a World Series. With his team up 3
games to 2 with one of those wins belonging to him he pitched 7 innings of
game 6 and only allowed 2 runs.

  - It's not his fault that the Red Sox couldn't get more than 2 runs.

  - It's not his fault that Calvin Sharaldi couldn't prevent the Mets from
    scoring a 3rd run to match the Sox run that took them into extra innings.

  - It's not his fault that with 2 out in the 10th and a 2 run lead Sharaldi
    allowed Garry Frigg'en Carter to get a hit.

  - It's not his fault that with 2 out in the 10th and a 2 run lead Sharaldi
    allowed Kevin Frigg'en Mitchel to get another a hit.

  - It's not HIS fault that with 2 out in the 10th and a 1 run lead Sharaldi
    allowed RAY Frigg'en KNIGHT to get ANOTHER a hit!

  - It's NOT HIS fault that with TWO OUT IN THE 10TH and a ONE RUN LEAD that
    BOB FRIGG'EN STANLEY got crossed up and allowed THE TIE'EN FRIGG'EN RUN!!!

  - IT'S NOT HIS FRIGG'EN FAULT THAT *** MOOKIE FRIGG'EN WILSON *** hit a
    FIRGG'EN GROUNDER THROUGH BILL FRIGG'EN BUCKNER'S WICKETS!!!!!!!!!

  ...

  ...

  What were we talking about? ... Oh yeah, Clemens. ...

  It wasn't his fault, he did what he had to do to win a World Series.

  George
63.665CAMONE::WAYUSS Herring, SS-283, In MemoriamTue Jun 06 1995 14:565
If 200+ wins w/no WS or 175 wins and a WS were valid criteria, then
there's a lot of pitchers who are in the HoF who wouldn't be there.


'Saw
63.666ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 06 1995 14:587
    
    Um...
    
    Who?
    
    Joe (not remembering many HoF w/ < 200 wins, other than relievers...)
    
63.667Wake up Groaner!!SHRMSG::GALVINknockemdownspinemrounheygobowlingTue Jun 06 1995 15:0115
    re;  Groaner
    
ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..."     4 lines   6-JUN-1995 07:23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Tribe wins again, what else is new. [[[[ This is getting boring.]]]]
    Hersheiser with the shut out.  The big three on the pitching staff
    should be able to carry them to WS victory.
    
    
    And you call yourself a FAN????  If it's getting too boring, jump on
    the Yankees wagon.  BTW, the Sox also won last night, and it ain't
    BORING!!!!!
    
    RTG
63.668CAMONE::WAYUSS Herring, SS-283, In MemoriamTue Jun 06 1995 18:0317
>    Um...
>    
>    Who?
>    
>    Joe (not remembering many HoF w/ < 200 wins, other than relievers...)

I dunno.  I'd have to look it up.  I'm betting that some of the early pitchers
who are in there don't have that criteria.

If I get a chance tonight (which is iffy since I have a ton of other things 
to do) I'll browse through Total Baseball and see what I can come
up with......


'Saw
    

63.669So, how's that KoD thing work, anywaysPTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneTue Jun 06 1995 18:116
    The Clevescum Injuns, my favorite A(lmost) (L)eague team.
    
    Go tribe
    
    JaKe
    
63.670USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jun 06 1995 18:1422
>>    NY on the other hand seems to be suffering from high expectations.
    
>    Who knows; the shortterm window of opportunity may have closed on the 
>    Yankees.  Wouldn't that be a shame.  There is some advancing age 
>    and/or terminal injury problems on this team with key players like Key,
>    Tartabull, Boggs, Mattingly and a bunch of good role players in the
>    31-32 range.

The Yanks aren't suffering from "high expectations" or "advancing age".
They're suffering from not having their ace pitching every 5th day,
and having an awful early-season slump, which won't end with guys
like Eenhoorn, Silvestri, and Jeter in the everyday lineup, or 3/5s
of the rotation being made up of Hitchcock-Pettite-Rivera.

One part of the team that has not met expectations is the bullpen,
where Ausanio has proven to be a one-year wonder, and Wickman (5.+),
Howe (9.+) and Wetteland (4.+?) haven't been able to keep runs off
the board.

As a Yankee fan I'm more concerned about not being able to play 3
consecutive very good years (with nothing to show from the previous
2) than I am about them heading toward some kind of rebuilding program.
63.671ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 06 1995 18:1713
    
    HoF prediction for the day...
    
    Of the current Indians, only the following will eventually make the HoF:
    
    Carlos Baerga
    Manny Ramirez
    Dennis Martinez
    Eddie Murray
    Dave Winfield
    Julian Tavarez
    
    Joe
63.672ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 06 1995 18:229
    
> The Yanks aren't suffering from "high expectations" or "advancing age".
    
    Yes, they are.  Well, advancing age at least; nearly all of the
    Yankee's talent is past their prime, which hurts in two ways:
    they're more prone to injury, and they're in a general pattern of
    decline (at least for the hitters).
    
    Joe
63.673HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 06 1995 18:4722
RE                    <<< Note 63.670 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>The Yanks aren't suffering from "high expectations" or "advancing age".
>They're suffering from not having their ace pitching every 5th day,
>and having an awful early-season slump, which won't end with guys
>like Eenhoorn, Silvestri, and Jeter in the everyday lineup, or 3/5s
>of the rotation being made up of Hitchcock-Pettite-Rivera.

  I'm not sure it's that simple. The Red Sox have managed to both get into and
hold onto 1st place without their Ace pitcher and with a bunch of guys on the
DL. 

  My girlfriend's son works in New York and this past weekend he told me that
the New York press is starting to get on the Yankees for not living up to their
preseason expectations.

  If those guys don't start playing up to spec it's going to be a long hot
summer of merciless bashing from both their owner and the press. The last
place I'd want to be these days is the Yankees locker room. That's going to
become one tense place, with or without George Castanzia.

  George
63.674CAMONE::WAYUSS Herring, SS-283, In MemoriamTue Jun 06 1995 18:5514
>
>  My girlfriend's son works in New York and this past weekend he told me that
>the New York press is starting to get on the Yankees for not living up to their
>preseason expectations.
>


You should hear the Yankees fans on WFAN of late.  It's a pleasure to listen
to them whine and whine and whine.

Almost as bad as Mets fans.....


8^)
63.675Yes, one of life's pleasures; Yanks in the cellar...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jun 06 1995 19:0110
> You should hear the Yankees fans on WFAN of late.  It's a pleasure to listen
> to them whine and whine and whine.
    
    As one of Imus' stooges might put it in his parody of sportstalk
    radio:  "Yo Mad Dog what up wit dat bum Maddinglee?"
    
    
    glenn
    
63.676ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 06 1995 19:0530
63.677ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 06 1995 19:072
63.678ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 06 1995 19:086
63.679WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MBob Backlund for President?Tue Jun 06 1995 19:113
    
    
    Excuse alert  #984...
63.680IMBETR::DUPREZTue Jun 06 1995 19:1217
I agree with .676.  Hershiser's 67 scoreless innings is
the flashy stat to get him over the hump - I'm not sure
the total wins and W/L % would do it.   And I *really*
like the way Dennis Martinez put it back together after
his alcohol problems.  I really like watching him pitch.
HoF?  Maybe, maybe not, but he'd have my vote.  (I like
guys who aren't afraid to pitch inside.)

RE: .675
	Julian Tavarez?????????

	I suppose we should just induct every guy who
	went 15-6 or better in AAA.

	He looks like a whip when he's pitching, though.
	And he *should* be in the rotation.
63.681ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 06 1995 19:1934
    
> I agree with .676.  Hershiser's 67 scoreless innings is
> the flashy stat to get him over the hump - I'm not sure
> the total wins and W/L % would do it.
    
    I'm sure his W/L and win% won't be enough; in fact, I'm reasonably
    sure that even with the flashy stat he won't make it without a
    nice close to his career.
    
> And I *really* like the way Dennis Martinez put it back together after
> his alcohol problems.  I really like watching him pitch.  HoF?  Maybe, 
> maybe not, but he'd have my vote.  (I like guys who aren't afraid to 
> pitch inside.)
    
    I think the fact that he's finishing his career so strong will be
    the edge that gets him in.  It does two things: it gives his career
    numbers a nice boost, and it leaves a positive image on the voters.
    
> RE: .675
>	Julian Tavarez?????????

    Yeah...
    
>	I suppose we should just induct every guy who
>	went 15-6 or better in AAA.

    Not at all; I wasn't arguing that these guys _should_ go into the
    HoF (I think, eventually, Thome will have a _great_ argument, but
    still won't make it), just predicting that they _will_.  Yes,
    Tavarez is a long shot, and is nowhere close at this point (and
    won't be worth arguing about for 10 years or so), but he's as good
    a bet as any other 22 year old pitcher right now...
    
    Joe
63.683ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 06 1995 19:205
63.684HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 06 1995 19:2115
  Remember once again that it's the "Hall of Fame", not the "Hall of Really
Great Baseball Players".

  Roger Clemens has been a major star throughout the 80's and 90's starting
several all-star games and playing the role of the franchise player around
which the team is built. He's been the go to guy that's pulled them out of
losing streaks during pennant and division championship years and he's had
extended periods in which he's overpowered American League hitters.

  And! He holds the all time record for strikeouts in a game at 20.

  He's a lock. If he walked away today he'd be a shoe in for the Hall of
Fame.

  George
63.685ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 06 1995 19:234
63.686HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 06 1995 19:254
  I agree, Oral's scoreless string and that World Series he won practically
single handed make him about as sure a bet as you'll ever see.

  George
63.687Roger is far from a sure thingTNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics coach? I'm available!Tue Jun 06 1995 19:406
    Roger's 179 wins make him far from a lock.  His mediocre postseason
    record and relative lack of success since 1992 put him in a tenuous
    position re. the Hall.  I think he needs at least two more solid years
    before he can receive serious consideration.
    
    NAZZ
63.688PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneTue Jun 06 1995 19:4110
    
    >>   <<< Note 63.681 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Is that along the same lines as "From Zanzibar to Barkley Square"????
    
    Inquiring mindless and all that SLOF
    
    JaKe
    
63.689HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 06 1995 19:428
  Well as I understand it, the only way he'll retire is if the Red Sox win the
World Series. I assume that means if they win and he's part of it. So if that
happens, there's his World Series success. If not, then he's get a few more
years.

  Either way, he'll probably get in the hall.

  George
63.690300+ win pitchers Niekro, Sutton not even in yet...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jun 06 1995 19:5211
    I suspect that the only way that Dennis Martinez will be getting into
    the HOF is with a full-admission ticket.  There's just not enough there 
    beyond the longevity.  No 20-win seasons, marginal career ERA, winning
    percentage (wasted many seasons with very good Baltimore teams).  He'll
    need a few more very strong seasons at minimum.  Does have the perfect 
    game to push him over the top if he can get into the 275-win range,
    though.
    
    glenn
    
63.691IMBETR::DUPREZTue Jun 06 1995 19:533
>From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls

Hey, ho, where'd you go, Ohio?
63.692CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westTue Jun 06 1995 19:567
    
    Maybe I have the wrong Martinez, but I thought he had a number of 2.xx
    era years.  Regardless of win %, if you have an era like that, you
    deserve to be in the HOF.
    
    Marc
    
63.693ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 06 1995 20:0713
    
>>From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls

>Hey, ho, where'd you go, Ohio?
    
    Quite right.  (From a Pretenders song, for those who (a) don't
    know, and (b) care.)  One of the few times you'll hear my
    hometown mentioned.
    
    Joe (Proud (mostly) to be from Cuyahoga Falls, OH, where men are
         men, women are women, pop is pop, tennis shoes aren't Tennis
         shoes, and the piece of grass between the sidewalk and the
         street is the devil strip.)
63.694PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneTue Jun 06 1995 20:1210
    
    >>Joe (Proud (mostly) to be from Cuyahoga Falls, OH, where men are
    >>men, 
    
    And sheep are scared.
    
    (8^)*
    
    Jake
    
63.695ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 06 1995 20:225
    
    You're most welcome for the setup line, Jake.
    
    Joe (Who could point out that there aren't any sheep in CFO, but
         wouldn't want to see the reply after that.)
63.696PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneTue Jun 06 1995 20:296
    Scared em all away, eh??
    
    thanks fer the setup
    
    JaKe
    
63.697ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 07 1995 10:584
63.698CAMONE::WAYUSS Herring, SS-283, In MemoriamWed Jun 07 1995 12:187
What we used to say about Hebron where I lived was:

		Hebron, where men are men, sheep are scared and
		women pee standing up......


'Saw
63.699ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 07 1995 12:337
>    Same old story, Tribe wins again, now 26-10.  Best record in 
>    baseball.  Question now is, will they win 100 games in the
>    strike shortened season?
    
    I'd guess they will, yes.
    
    Joe
63.700So, is Albert still corking his bat or what?SALEM::DODAChairman of the BoredWed Jun 07 1995 13:370
63.701Team of the 1990'sCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Wed Jun 07 1995 13:556
    re.697
    
    Anything less then 100 wins by the most powerful lineup since the 1927
    Yankees would be a major disappointment. Plus with the top farm system
    anything less then 3 World Series championships before 2000 would be a 
    choke job.
63.702USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jun 07 1995 13:5817
>    I suspect that the only way that Dennis Martinez will be getting into
>    the HOF is with a full-admission ticket.

>    (wasted many seasons with very good Baltimore teams).


He was the weakest pitcher on the Orioles' staff.  As Glenn points out,
Martinez has done nothing to distinguish himself.  He's a good pitcher,
period.

As for Clemens, does anyone have his year-to-year numbers ?  The 3 Cy's
are big, but I think he dropped to "above average" pretty quickly.  I
don't think he's a lock.  Whenever I think about pitchers and the HoF
I start by comparing them to Ron Guidry.  Gator ain't gonna get in,
and most cite his lack of "aggregate" numbers as the reason...he simply
didn't have a long enough career.  But the 1.28 ERA, the 25-3, the Cy,
and those WS wins are all notable.
63.703< 200 pitchersAKOCOA::BREENWed Jun 07 1995 14:068
    Two pitchers with less than 200 wins are Dizzy Dean and Sandy Koufax,
    both with less than Clemens.  But Roger doesn't quite stack up with
    these two, a pair (at prime) for many an all time all-star team.
    
    Clemens matches up well with Catfish Hunter but he had a pretty good
    post-season record, a big plus to today's minds.  I think Nazz had it
    right on the button which shows his baseball knowledge well ahead of
    his basketball malpredictions.
63.704ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 07 1995 14:1410
    
>    Plus with the top farm system
    
    I hate to say it (actually, I _really_ _really_ hate to say it), but
    the Indians no longer have the top fram system, or anything close to
    it.  They have some decent players in the minors - even a few posible
    stars such as Enrique Wilson & David Bell - but the number of position
    player prospects has dropped off significantly.
    
    Joe
63.705Clemens' ERA, winning pct. superlative...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jun 07 1995 14:3334
    
>> As for Clemens, does anyone have his year-to-year numbers ?  The 3 Cy's
>> are big, but I think he dropped to "above average" pretty quickly.
    
> Clemens matches up well with Catfish Hunter but he had a pretty good
> post-season record, a big plus to today's minds.  I think Nazz had it
> right on the button which shows his baseball knowledge well ahead of
> his basketball malpredictions.
    
    Nope, and uh-uh.  You're all selling Clemens short to this point in
    his career.  There's been only _one_ full season that wasn't "well 
    above average".  Clemens isn't done yet and he's got only 326 starts 
    under his belt so it's not like he "should" have 250 wins or something
    by now.  But in getting to the ~175-W number he's done as well as just 
    about anyone ever has, with a lifetime winning percentage right there 
    with Koufax and Dean (who played for better teams overall):
    
    Year    Team     W    L   PCT     ERA     G       SV      IP     BB     SO
     
    1984 Boston-AL   9    4  .692    4.32    21      0      133.1    29    126
    1985 Boston-AL   7    5  .583    3.29    15      0       98.1    37     74
    1986 Boston-AL  24    4  .857    2.48    33      0      254.0    67    238
    1987 Boston-AL  20    9  .690    2.97    36      0      281.2    83    256
    1988 Boston-AL  18   12  .600    2.93    35      0      264.0    62    291
    1989 Boston-AL  17   11  .607    3.13    35      0      253.1    93    230
    1990 Boston-AL  21    6  .778    1.93    31      0      228.1    54    209
    1991 Boston-AL  18   10  .643    2.62    35      0      271.1    65    241
    1992 Boston-AL  18   11  .621    2.41    32      0      246.2    62    208
    1993 Boston-AL  11   14  .440    4.46    29      0      191.2    67    160
    1994 Boston-AL   9    7  .563    2.85    24      0      170.2    71    168
    
    Career Totals: 172   93  .649    2.93   326      0     2393.1   690   2201
    
    
63.706Go Indians, Go YankeesCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Wed Jun 07 1995 14:426
    Joe,
    With all of these great young pitchers and OF's they have more talent
    then everyone else. They are the #1 Franchise in baseball. Only the
    Yankees are close.
    
    Mike
63.707WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MGet Well MickeyWed Jun 07 1995 15:019
    
    
        Clemens is the best pitcher I have seen in my lifetime. Better
    than Seaver, better than Ryan, better than Sutton. I think he should
    go into the HOF. The only thing that may deter this is a few 6-14 years
    but I don't think he'll do that.
    
    
    Chap
63.708Other pitchers have much better stats and are not in the HallTNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics coach? I'm available!Wed Jun 07 1995 15:1417
    Clemens has played 11 years in the bigs.  He's had seven excellent
    years and four mediocre ones, including his last two.  He has not
    performed well in post season.  He will not get into the Hall unless he
    has at least two more excellent seasons.
    
    Compare Clemens' stats with these, a pitcher who has not gotten
    anywhere near the Hall of Fame consideration he deserves:
    
    YRS	 W    L   PCT   ERA   G    GS   CG   IP    H    BB    SO   Shutouts 
    19  229  172 .571  3.30  573  484  187  3485 3075  1104  2416    49
    
    That pitcher is the great
    
    	
    LUIS TIANT!
    
    NAZZ
63.709Unlike RogerTNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics coach? I'm available!Wed Jun 07 1995 15:153
    And Tiant is 3-0 in postseason, including a shutout.
    
    NAZZ
63.710EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jun 07 1995 15:199
    Nazz, how was Clemens' 1994 "mediocre" (or his 1985 for that matter)?
    Because all the players went on strike?  Because the Sox were once
    again pathetic?  The fact is that Clemens was just nipped at the wire 
    for the ERA title by a guy who just put in the minimum innings over a 
    partial, partial season.  That ain't "mediocre".
    
    glenn
    
63.711HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jun 07 1995 15:219
  I think you might want to look again at Clemens post season record. 

  At least in '86 he had a critical win game 6 of the ALCS then he won game 2
of the World Series and left game 6 a 2-2 tie (at least he did his job). 

  And he did all that with a blister that made it almost impossible for him
to throw a curve.

  George
63.712No comparisonTNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics coach? I'm available!Wed Jun 07 1995 15:3219
    What's your definition of 9-7 Glenn?  It certainly isn't excellent!
    
    In 1986, Clemens was 1-1 with a 4.37 ERA in the LCS, and 0-0 with a
    3.18 in the WS.  That was after going 24-4 with a 2.48 ERA in the
    regular season.
    
    Tiant, on the other hand, pitched one game in the 1975 LCS, went the
    route, and gave up only 3 hits and no earned runs, getting the 7-1 win.
    In the WS, he started three games.  In game 1, he pitched a complete
    game, 5 hit shutout against the Big Red Machine.  He even singled and
    scored the first run!  In game four, he again went the distance,
    despite not having his best stuff.  He gutted out a 5-4 win, throwing
    an amazing 163 pitches!  In game six, he went seven innings and was
    not involved in the decision.
    
    In sum, Tiant pitched a complete game in all but one of his post-season
    appearances, and the Sox won every game.  Not too shabby.
    
    NAZZ
63.713Let's be consistent...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jun 07 1995 15:378
>    What's your definition of 9-7 Glenn?  It certainly isn't excellent!
    
    It's within .010 of the Great Luis Tiant's _lifetime_ winning
    percentage, pitching for a bad team...
    
    glenn
      
63.714he'll get in, but he can't be considered a "lock"USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jun 07 1995 15:467
>    Career Totals: 172   93  .649    2.93   326      0     2393.1   690   2201
                                      ^^^^

That ERA is his best argument, so far.  3 20-win seasons isn't superlative,
and you can't convince me that he's been playing for lousy teams.  Boston
won the AL East 3 times between '86-90.  Mel Stottlemeyer won 20/season
with much worse teams than any Clemens has pitched for.
63.715SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Wed Jun 07 1995 16:3026
    
    	In Rogers 4 so called mediocre years he didn't have complete
    seasons. In '84 I believe he started in the minor leagues. In '85
    didn't he have shoulder surgery? I'd call '93 a bad year, he did
    finish the season on the DL. In '94 is ERA was below 3.00 and he
    averaged 7 innings pitched per start. The '94 gave him no run support
    and the bullpen blew 8 Wins for Roger. Clemens easily could have been
    17-7 last year, but ended up at 9-7.
    	Roger needs another two or three 15 win seasons. Plus keep his
    career ERA under 3.00. Another plus for Roger is that over his entire
    career he has averaged (2393/326) = 7.3 innings per start, with good
    strikeout to walk ratio's. The guy has been a work horse .
    	I doubt you will ever see a pitcher pitch for 20 years as a 
    starting pitcher ever again. The so called rules for getting into
    the HOF have to change some time. You can't compare the '80s and '90's
    with the '40s and '50s.
    	In fact I believe if Babe Ruth was playing today. He would only
    be an average player or a failure. Why do I think that? I don't believe
    the pitchers in Ruth's era threw the ball faster then 85 M.P.H. With
    most thorowing in the high '70s. Or threw more then 2 pitches 
    (Fastball/Curve). Babe Ruth supposedly swung a bat that weighed 60
    oz's. He swings that bat against a Roger Clemens and he strikes out
    9 outta 10 times. I don't think anybody in major league baseball uses
    a bat. That weighs more then 40 oz today.
    
    Ron
63.716ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 07 1995 16:387
63.717ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 07 1995 16:405
63.718:-)ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 07 1995 16:413
63.719ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 07 1995 16:4424
63.720.650 W-L is the goods...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jun 07 1995 16:4618
                      
>>    Career Totals: 172   93  .649    2.93   326      0     2393.1   690   2201
>                                      ^^^^
>
> That ERA is his best argument, so far. 
    
    I like the winning percentage even more.  Granted, a 2.93 ERA pitching 
    half his games in Fenway is incredible, but the winning percentage 
    always has its built-in point of reference: .500, where one team always
    wins, and one loses.  Playing conditions, pitching rotation theories 
    change, but the W-L outcome remains the same.  Sure, there are 
    extenuating circumstances such as quality of team, quality of bullpen 
    (as Billte pointed out to me Clemens generally hasn't had a good one 
    behind him), but over the long haul a .650 winning percentage (even on 
    a slightly above-average Red Sox over 1984-94) is top of the line...
    
    glenn
    
63.721Team of the late 90'sCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Wed Jun 07 1995 16:5413
    RE .716
    Paul,
    Where did I say that you said it? Are you telling me that they don't?
    With all of the young pitching talent in the farm they have enough arms
    there for almost 2 ML teams. And with some of the other talent they
    have only the Yankees right now are close to having the young talent all
    through their organization. Like I said anything less the 3 WS rings in
    the next 5 years would be a huge disappointment. They are in the same
    category now that the Braves were in 3 years ago.
    
    Mike
    
    
63.722ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 07 1995 16:588
63.723The most talented team since the 1978 Red SoxCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Wed Jun 07 1995 17:2611
    Oh come on Paul, your selling this organization short. They have more
    good arms in their system then anyone. Why else would people keep
    coming to them looking for young pitching. They have an abundance of
    young arms and even have Greg Olson down on the farm almost ready to 
    to come back and be a 30-35 saves/season closer.
    And although the Thome's, Ramirez's etc are now superstars ( or close
    to it) they still have more coming thru the system but not quite in the
    numbers they once did. All of yous Indian fans should sit back, relax
    and enjoy the great times ahead. They have the most talent around.
    
    Mike
63.724ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 07 1995 17:3419
    
    OK, Mike...
    
    Just _who_ do the Indians have?  You mentioned OF and P as the
    positions the Indians are strong in through the system - so just 
    who are you talking about?  Legitimate prospects, now, not 25 year
    olds tearing up AA in their third try...
    
    RE: Clemens, and wins...
    
    1) Over the course of a season, a pitchers won/loss record is almost
       completely independent of how well he pitched.  
    
    2) Over the course of a career, won/loss record _is_ meaningful;
       Clemens wins, w/l %, and ERA are an excellent argument for the
       HoF right now; Tiant's aren't as good, but have made him a
       marginal candidate, so shouldn't _better_ numbers be a HoFer?
    
    Joe
63.725ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 07 1995 19:0415
63.726HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jun 07 1995 19:095
  Ferguson Genkins (how ever that's spelled), now there was a pitcher.

  What ever wins he got, look what he had to work with.

  George
63.727ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 08 1995 11:035
63.728many :*))AD::HEATHDon't get to excited yetThu Jun 08 1995 11:196
    
    
      All they could manage off that pathetic Tiger staff is 3 runs.
    What a joke of an offense.
    
    Jerry
63.729ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 08 1995 11:278
63.730CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Thu Jun 08 1995 11:5615
    Joe,
    What I based my statements on are reports from Baseball America and
    Baseball Weekly last winter that had the Indians farm system rated very
    highly. Pitching was listed as the deepest part of the organization.
    Omar Ramirez and David Bell were listed as up and coming hitters that
    could soon be in Cleveland. Most of the young pitching that has come up
    thru the system still bounce back and forth between Charlotte and
    Cleveland which is why I think of some of them still in the minors and
    developing. 
    I think that right now the Indians have more young developing players
    in the Majors and Minors then anyone. The way they have constructed this 
    team should be a model to all of MLB. They should be in contention and
    fighting for the World Series for the rest of the decade. 
    
    Mike
63.7316214::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 08 1995 12:105
    
    Someone said it last year so it must be true.  Yes, maybe last year
    but not this year.  Bell is  definitely a prospect, Omar Ramirez is
    not.  BA regularly lists the minor league ratings and I don't think
    Cleveland is in the top 5 any more.
63.7326214::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 08 1995 12:3158
    
    Mike,
    
>    What I based my statements on are reports from Baseball America and
>    Baseball Weekly last winter that had the Indians farm system rated very
>    highly.
    
    Unfortunately, BA & BW are a little behind, just as they were behind
    when the system was on the upswing.  It's not empty, but it's no
    longer among the best.
    
>    Pitching was listed as the deepest part of the organization.
    
    That's certainly true.
    
>    Omar Ramirez and David Bell were listed as up and coming hitters that
>    could soon be in Cleveland.
    
    Omar Ramirez is on the border between being a career minor leaguer
    and a 4th/5th outfielder in the majors for a few years.  Bell will
    be a major league player.
    
>    Most of the young pitching that has come up
>    thru the system still bounce back and forth between Charlotte and
>    Cleveland which is why I think of some of them still in the minors and
>    developing. 
    
    Actually, about the only guys bouncing right now are Ogea and Shuey
    (well, I suppose you could note Clark, though I think of that more
    as rehab than anything else).
    
>    I think that right now the Indians have more young developing players
>    in the Majors and Minors then anyone.
    
    Ah - I see some of the source of confusion now.  The Tribe does have
    at least three players in the majors who haven't hit their peak yet -
    Baerga, Thome, and Ramirez.  If you look at them as prospects (which
    isn't really a bad thing to do, I suppose) then the system looks much
    better, since all three have legitimate shots at HoF careers right
    now.
    
>    The way they have constructed this team should be a model to all of 
>    MLB. They should be in contention and fighting for the World Series 
>    for the rest of the decade. 
    
    So long as they don't start trading off the _real_ prospects, I agree.
    I don't mind when we send a DiPoto or Mlicki off (well, at least when
    we get someone good like Burnitz in return), but if the Indians start
    considering dealing guys like Thome, Bell, and Ramirez, the good
    times could end very quickly.
    
    The Tribe brass has yet to show how well they can sustain success.
    The Indians are going to have some real financial questions soon -
    while 5 superstars can be payed for when some are years away from
    free agency, it's not going to be that long before the Indians are
    going to have to decide who they can afford to keep.
    
    Joe
63.733CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Thu Jun 08 1995 13:0321
    
    
    
    
    >Ah - I see some of the source of confusion now.  The Tribe does have
    >at least three players in the majors who haven't hit their peak yet-
    >Baerga, Thome, and Ramirez.  If you look at them as prospects
    >(which isn't really a bad thing to do, I suppose) then the system looks
    >much better, since all three have legitimate shots at HoF careers right
    >now.
    
    Which is my point. And throw in Belle and Lofton. If Bell comes along
    (I didn't realize that O Ramirez had fallen from grace) and Sandy
    Alomar ever stays healthy there won't be a better regular lineup
    anywhere. Also isn't Burnitz tearing up AAA pitching and hitting over
    .300? If the pitching continues to develop your solid for the rest of
    the decade. 
    
    
    
    
63.734USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jun 08 1995 13:114
>    Baerga, Thome, and Ramirez.  If you look at them as prospects

Baerga has been playing too long in the majors to be considered a prospect.
He's in his peak years now, age-wise.
63.735ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 08 1995 13:3322
    
>>    Baerga, Thome, and Ramirez.  If you look at them as prospects

> Baerga has been playing too long in the majors to be considered a prospect.
> He's in his peak years now, age-wise.
    
    Well, that all depends, and that's where Mike & I were out of sync.
    Even given how long Baerga has been in the major leagues (he was a
    semi-regular in 1990), he still hasn't seen the age of 27 that tends
    to mark the peak of hitters careers, so there still is some small hope
    of continued improvement.  Belle and Lofton are different matters
    altogether, though.
    
    w.r.t Burnitz
    
    While he is doing well at AAA, I don't think of him as a prospect
    either.  He's 26; he's not likely to show any real improvement
    from this point on.
    
    Which is fine; he'll make a nice addition, particularly at DH.
    
    Joe
63.736ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 08 1995 13:466
63.737Another one bites the dust!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERThu Jun 08 1995 20:3533
    
    	Hi Guys,
    		I'm Baaack!  I know I've been gone for too long but will
    try as hard as possible to enter something in here at least weekly.
    This new scheduel I'm on really sucks!  Not much time for much.  At
    any rate, I see the ICEMAN has been keeping things going though.
    
    		How about the Tribe!  Best record in the Majors.  I really
    don't think I've ever seen this before in my short life.  Kind of
    strange......but, I'll get used to it real quick!
    
    		This has got to be the best lineup ever.  No lead is safe
    against the Indians!  I've got to get my dish hooked up again.  I can't
    stand that dam CNN crap, wait and wait and wait for an update.  I swear
    the game stood still in the bottom of the 9th for over 45 minutes
    before going into the 10 inning.  I figured for sure the tribe was
    going to win the game in the 9th....then, the Final came up.  
    
    		CLEVELAND 3 - DETROIT 2
    
    	TAKE OUT THE BROOMS...SWEEP, SWEEP, SWEEP
    
    		Get out of here!  Will ya....
    
    	On to Millwalkee now.....keep up the hard work!  
    
    
    	The Chief...
    			WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
    
    	
    My Indian flag should be here by the middle of next week.....GO TRIBE!
    
63.738ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 08 1995 21:595
63.739JUST KEEP ON WINNINGSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERThu Jun 08 1995 22:4413
    
    
    	W A H O O     GO TRIBE!
    
    
    		I WANA GO HOME!
    
    	ICEMAN, be sure and let me know when you go on your next excursion
    	back to O-H-I-O, I wana see the INDIANS at home!
    
    	The Chief
    
    		W A H O O !
63.740PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneThu Jun 08 1995 23:216
    Oh cripes sake, HAL's back.
    
    No NOTE is safe, now,.
    
    JaKe
    
63.741ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 09 1995 01:554
63.742PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneFri Jun 09 1995 03:435
    I cain only wish somebody forcefully gives you a battery-acid enema in
    repayment for waking up HAL, Groaner.
    
    JaKe
    
63.743these 9th inning wins are really getting boringROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 09 1995 11:3823
63.744ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 09 1995 11:385
63.745ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 09 1995 12:2710
63.746IMBETR::DUPREZFri Jun 09 1995 12:5014
>    If its not bad enough that the tribe is 28-10, i'm in here pumping them
>    up every day and now I got Hal back in here...

No problem with you pumping them up every day, but it's sad that they have
to go 28-10 to get Hal out of the woodwork...

>    but Grimsley has been
>    dropped from the rotation and Ogea is starting tonight.  Heck, they
>    could go undefeated from here on out.

Doubtful, but it's a step in the right direction towards that goal.  :-)

Grimsley is one of those guys who looks good during warmups, *then* gets
shelled...
63.747ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 09 1995 12:579
    
    You know, I'm starting to have nightmares about the Indians running
    away with the Central by continuing their streak of late inning
    comebacks, facing the wild card Oakland team in the playoffs,
    Dennis Martinez being told not to pitch to Mark McGwire, throwing the
    ball into Lake Erie if he has to, and one of his pitches getting
    intercepted by McGwire's bat...
    
    Joe
63.748ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 09 1995 13:028
63.749exitSNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Fri Jun 09 1995 13:4414
    
    	Who plays who in the playoffs isn't decided until the season
    officially ends. The Division winner with the best record plays the
    Wildcard team. With the other two divison winners playing each other.
    The teams with the best records are the home teams. Except in the
    League championship, where a Wildcard team can't be the home team. The
    Division winner is always the home team against the Wildcard team.
    	I believe they scrapped the alternating years for the World Series
    also. Whoever has the best record is the home team. Which is the
    way it should be. Now that the rules used (DH/NO DH) are designated by
    which league they are in. 
    
    
    Ron
63.750or maybe you'll be spared by Fehr and Orza !USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jun 09 1995 14:014
>... and anyone who doesn't realize that its destiny for the Indians this
>year, check out inning #9.

We all know Cleveland's destiny.  I hope for your sake it happens swiftly...
63.751HO HUMSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERFri Jun 09 1995 15:0015
    
    
    		W A H O O O ! ! !
    
    
    	Top of the ninth.......Indians down by 2 runs.......Visquell up to
    bat.....single.....Carlos up.....single.....men on 1st and second, no
    outs......ALBERT BELL at the plate.....smack.....double...two runs
    score...tie game....one batter later, HOME RUN!!!!!  GAME OVER.....
    
    
    	TRIBE WINS AGAIN AT THEIR LAST AT BAT!
    
    	
    		WAHOOOOOOOOO!
63.752IMBETR::DUPREZFri Jun 09 1995 15:047
<sigh>

At least Joe H. and Groaner contribute some reasonable analysis and don't
enter monotonous ranting...

Is your right-hand ring finger crazy-glued to the "." key?
63.753PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneFri Jun 09 1995 15:1216
    
    >>p.p.s. JaKe, how bout those pirates
    
    They're right where they're supposed to be, in the dumper.
    
    When your pitching staff is a cross between AA and AAA, and the defense
    sucks, and ya cain't hit the ball hard, and you have no speed on the
    basepaths, and, well, I could go on and on forever on the weaknesses
    the Pirates have brought on by the current owners consortium's
    continued lack of infusing money into the team and paying REAL players
    to play here, but I won't.
    
    they suck, that says it all.
    
    JaKe
    
63.754HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 09 1995 15:168
  Actually seeing the excitement from Cleveland fans is part of the fun. I
remember reading last summer about how people in Cleveland were really psyched
about the team and people started comparing it to 1954. Back then everyone was
talking about the Tribe, schools let kids out for the World Series and everyone
went bananas. 

  Can't really hate a town that loves baseball,
  George
63.755PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneFri Jun 09 1995 15:1812
    
 >> Can't really hate a town that loves baseball,
    
    I see you've never spent any time in Clevescum, right George.  What
    with it's burning rivers, and it being the world's only inhabited raw
    sewage dump, with the painted sh_t they call a field in the old
    stadium....
    
    Place is the dump of the world.
    
    JaKe
    
63.756CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Fri Jun 09 1995 16:1612
    >If its not bad enough that the tribe is 28-10, i'm in here pumping
    >them up every day and now I got Hal back in here... but Grimsley has
    >been dropped from the rotation and Ogea is starting tonight.  Heck, they
    >could go undefeated from here on out.
    
    Paul,
    Does that mean that anything less then a perfect record by th Indians
    for the rest of the year would be a CHOKE?
    
    
    
     End of note
63.757CAMONE::WAYUSS Herring, SS-283, In MemoriamFri Jun 09 1995 16:1915
I was in Cleveland once and found it be a very nice city.

Never actually been IN Pittsburgh, but that part of Pennsylvania is 
nice too.


I've never really understood the big LDUC between Cleveland and Pittsburgh
people.

YOU guys wanna see a dump of a city, take a look at Bridgeport Ct.  It's the
armpit of the world.....



'Saw
63.758ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 09 1995 17:054
63.759ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 09 1995 17:2828
    
    JaKe,
    
>    When your pitching staff is a cross between AA and AAA,
    
    Oh, come on - the Pirates have a reasonably good staff, they're
    just young.
    
>    and the defense sucks,
    
    I'll take your word for it.
    
>    and ya cain't hit the ball hard,
    
    Aude can.  Bell certainly has before.  Cummings can hit.  Garcia's
    OK.  King's hitting well.  Al Martin's a fine player with some power.
    Merced might not hit HR, but he's got some pop.  Parent has hit well
    this year.  It's not great, but they aren't completely without
    hitters.
    
>    and you have no speed on the basepaths, 
    
    No speedsters, maybe, but stolen bases aren't worth much anyway...
    
    The Pirates, for all their problems, aren't _that_ bad.  It wouldn't
    take _that_ much for the team to improve dramatically next year.
    
    Joe
63.760PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneFri Jun 09 1995 19:0829
    
    >>Oh, come on - the Pirates have a reasonably good staff, they're
    >>just young.
    
    Well, for all they have, potential wise, they suck.  Paul Wagner is
    1-8, with an ERA in the stratosphere, and the guy gives up first inning
    runs by the handful.  The rest of the staff, short of Denny Neagle, has
    been between mediocre and abysmal, too.
    
    
    >>Aude can.  Bell certainly has before.  Cummings can hit.  Garcia's
    >>OK.  King's hitting well.  Al Martin's a fine player with some power.
    >>Merced might not hit HR, but he's got some pop.  Parent has hit well
    >>this year.  It's not great, but they aren't completely without
    >>hitters.
    
    King is the only one who's been hitting with any consistency this
    season, so far, and he's been driving in runs but nobody else has been
    hitting, other than the spotty game or two.
    
    
    >>The Pirates, for all their problems, aren't _that_ bad.  It wouldn't
    >>take _that_ much for the team to improve dramatically next year.
    
    It wouldn't take that much for them to go into the dumper further,
    either nexted year.  BUT, this year, the team, as a whole sucks.
    
    JaKe
    
63.761ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 09 1995 19:315
63.762ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 09 1995 19:429
63.763ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sat Jun 10 1995 11:1910
63.764Greg Gagne :== Bucky &*%%^ DentAD::HEATHDon't get to excited yetSat Jun 10 1995 11:324
    
    
    
      I remember saying the same thing in 1978
63.765ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sat Jun 10 1995 19:053
63.766ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Jun 11 1995 13:053
63.767ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Jun 11 1995 13:0911
63.768SNAW - situation normal, another winROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Jun 11 1995 22:492
63.769ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 12 1995 02:5513
    
    You know, if the Indains manage to get Drabek & Hudek for some small
    price, they really will be bigtime favorites, and anything less than a
    WS appearance _will_ be a choke.  (I'm not convinced that a WS loss
    to the Braves would be a choke; Maddux & company are just too good
    to _expect_ to win against, no matter how good a lineup you have.)
    
    BTW, the Indians now have the longest streak this season of not losing
    two consecutive games, taking over from the Phillies (whose streak
    _is_ more noteworthy, though, having started with the first day of the
    season).
    
    Joe
63.770lets see if Belle is man enough to get 400 tb's Rice wasAD::HEATHDon't get to excited yetMon Jun 12 1995 10:395
    
    
     Paul....
    
     I'd take the '78 sox.  Or a better offensive team the '77 sox
63.771ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Jun 12 1995 11:467
63.772Wrong teamCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Mon Jun 12 1995 12:298
    >Rumors still around Cleveland getting Hudek and or Drabek from
    >Pittsburgh.  I'd gladly take Drabek, depending on what they have
    >to give up in return
    
     Man Houston is going to be Po'd about this since both play with the
    Astros. Rumor is that anyone who takes Drabek's or Swindell's contracts
    can get Hudek as well. Boston is also interested.
    
63.773Ken Ryan blowing one by Joey Belle to end it...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jun 12 1995 16:4910
    
>    You know, I'm starting to have nightmares about the Indians running
>    away with the Central by continuing their streak of late inning
>    comebacks, facing the wild card Oakland team in the playoffs,
    
    That was my thought, except replace Oakland with Boston doing the
    upsetting in those cheesy 5-game sub-playoff series...
    
    glenn
    
63.774ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Jun 12 1995 20:592
63.775ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 13 1995 11:0612
63.776ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 13 1995 11:1414
63.777Both should be on the team periodAD::HEATHDon't get to excited yetTue Jun 13 1995 11:278
    
    
     Paul don't get worked up about the some-star game.  Cleveland is a
    small market and like Boston problably hasn't even turned in any
    ballots yet.  When Thome and Vaughn both don't make the team we can
    whine about it together.
    
    Jerry
63.778ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 13 1995 11:535
63.779ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 13 1995 12:2010
    
    As ridiculous as the situation is for the Indians hitters, I saw
    one thing that really surprised me - Valentin wasn't even on the list
    at SS.  You know, between Boston and Cleveland you could very easily
    come up with a lineup that would beat the top vote getters more often
    than not... an infield of Vaughn, Baerga, Valentin, and Thome; Belle,
    Lofton, and Ramirez in the OF; MacFarlane behind the plate & Murray
    DHing.
    
    Joe
63.780HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 13 1995 13:2814
  Remember, it's an all STAR game, not a best player game.

  The fans vote for who they want to see in the all-star game and that may
or may not be the guy who's having the hot year or the prospect that we've
all been watching who's finally living up to potential.

  If the Indians make the World Series, then next year their guys will have
the name recognition to be stars.

  To add to the list, Ken Griffey is leading his category again even though
he's out for 3 months. I wouldn't be surprised to see Matt Williams drawing
votes as well even though he's got a broken foot.

  George
63.781ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 13 1995 14:145
    
    Yeah, I know, but still - that doesn't keep me from wanting to
    see the best players start...
    
    Joe
63.782HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 13 1995 14:268
  You know who I voted for this year? On my NL ballot I voted for Rey Sanchez
at 2nd base.

  Maybe there are guys more deserving but considering the job he had stepping
into the shoes of a living legend and considering that both Delino DeShields
and Carlos Garcia are having off years I figured he deserved a vote. 

  George
63.783SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERTue Jun 13 1995 22:5312
    
    	Well,
    		I recieved the flag from good ole Mom the other day and
    as usual, she over did it again.  Here I'm expected and normal size
    flag with Chief Wahoo on it and what do I get.......a flag thats 5
    times the size of a normal one.  Looks like I'm going to send it back
    and get a regular one cus, where in the hell would I put it anyway.
    
    
    	Wahoo!
    
    
63.784ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 14 1995 11:3811
63.785SMART2::CHILDSJJS the BucketsMasterWed Jun 14 1995 11:501
 drapped it around your body Hal...........
63.786IMBETR::DUPREZWed Jun 14 1995 12:307
Hal, if you were that big a fan you'd be *pleased* to have a 
huge flag!

Sounds like you could sell it to Paul.

Roland
63.787CLEVELAND INDIANS 11 - BALTIMORE OREOS 0SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERWed Jun 14 1995 13:0728
    
    	AAALLLLBBBEEERRRTTT BBBEEELLLLLLEEE
    
    	JJJIIIMMM TTTHHHOOOMMMEEE
    
    
    		HOOOOOOOMME RUN!
    
    	Another complete game for Dennis!
    
    	I can only imagine playing on this team.  What a feeling it must be
    	to win...win...win!
    
    	The flag cost her a good chunk of change....$65.00.  any offers
    before it goes back so I can get one of normal size?  
    
    	Manny comes back and gets a couple of hits...I think he went 2-3.
    
    	Loften has gotten real hot with the bat lately.
    
    	Winfield is on the DL.
    
    	Another double for Albert Belle.
    
    
    	The Chief,
    		
    		WAHOOOOOOO!
63.788ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 14 1995 13:135
    
    So, any non-Tribe fans think the Indians can break the Yankee's
    HR record in just 144 games?
    
    Joe
63.789IMBETR::DUPREZWed Jun 14 1995 13:2619
What's the record, and what year was it set in?

At first blush, I wouldn't put it past them.  They only lose
11% of the schedule, and their home run power is quite diversified
(so half of it doesn't leave if a key player is injured or sits out
a game).

But to do it, I think Albert Belle has to get a little hotter.



For Hal:
	Lofton's been hot with the bat for over 2 years now- the guy hit
	.325 and what, .349?  Where have you been?  And what kind of son
	are you - you're going to break your mother's heart if you return 
	that flag!

Roland
63.790It's a_conspiracyEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jun 14 1995 13:3115
>    So, any non-Tribe fans think the Indians can break the Yankee's
>    HR record in just 144 games?
    
    Sure.  Don't forget, though, that the last two seasons have
    demonstrated that ML pitching is at an absurd post-WWII low, 
    and this record could easily be shattered next year, by 
    Cleveland again, even.
    
    The current doubly-juiced rabbitball conditions are why I'm 
    not sure I'd make straight-up comparisons with teams like the
    1978 Red Sox (offensively, I mean).
    
    glenn
    
63.791ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 14 1995 13:408
    
    The record, for the record, is 240 HR in a season.
    
    And Glenn, if the proposed strike zone & mound height changes go
    through, I don't think anyone's going to be breaking HR records
    next year...
    
    Joe
63.792ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 14 1995 13:4632
63.793PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneWed Jun 14 1995 18:3411
    Ain't it funny how when the Tribe has finally shown that they just
    might be for real, HAL show up, just as looney as he is during football
    season.  When the Tribe was losing, he was virtually nowhere to be
    seen.  Sorta like a few years ago, when he was all hopped on on
    Browndirt from Clevescum, and rooting up one side and down the other
    fer the 'spots, and then they went into the tank(by the 4th game of the
    season), ended up something like 2-14 or 3-13, and the HAL didn't show
    up til training camp the nexted year.
    
    JaKe
    
63.794OLD1S::CADZILLA2In search of the ever Illusive T-birdWed Jun 14 1995 18:478
    
    Jake,
    
    
    If Hal did not show at times like these, we'd never know if he was
    still around. How would we survive without he and Groaner to keep
    us up to date on the current clevescum team. The indians are winning 
    for the first time since 47 and they have to let us know about it.
63.795ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 14 1995 18:565
    
    Well, they did fine in 94, and before than it was 59, not 47,
    actually, unless you want to count things like 86...
    
    Joe
63.796ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 14 1995 21:588
63.797Bring on those Yanks!!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERWed Jun 14 1995 22:5115
    
    	Break out the brooms......I smell a 
    
    
    
    
    		S W E E P ! ! !
    
    	Let me be an INDIAN for a day!  
    
    
    	The Chief,
    
    		WAHOOOOOOO!!!
    
63.798ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 15 1995 11:2614
63.799chicago won't even make the wildcard at this paceROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 15 1995 11:2812
63.800Sweep, Sweep,SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERThu Jun 15 1995 11:3312
    
    	YES,
    
    			A L B E R T   B E L L E
    
    
    				Home Run!
    
    
    The chief,
    		Wahoo!
    
63.801ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 15 1995 11:4312
63.802MKOTS3::LONGNaw Leens is one partying town!Thu Jun 15 1995 12:028
    Is Doug Drabek considering a move to the Indians?  Or is this just
    more "smoke and mirrors"?
    
    Hal, nice to see you come crawling out from under that rock...AGAIN!
    
    
    
    billl
63.803CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Thu Jun 15 1995 12:406
    Re -1
    Wow Note number .802 at 8.02. Is that a first?
    
    I have my number for today
    
    Mike
63.804ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 15 1995 12:4624
    
>    Is Doug Drabek considering a move to the Indians?  Or is this just
>    more "smoke and mirrors"?
    
    The rumor, as reported by Peter Gammons, is that:
    
    1) The Astros will give Hudek to anyone who will take Swindell.
    
    2) If the Astros fall farther behind Cincy, they'll substitute
       Drabek for Swindell.
    
    3) The Yankees & Indians are interested if Drabek is included.
    
    I'll say this - if the Indians manage to get Drabek & Hudek,
    the pitching staff will be the deepest I've ever seen.  Get rid
    of the stiffs, and you have...
    
    
    Martinez - Nagy - Hershiser - Ogea - Drabek - Black - Olson - Mesa -
    Hudek - Poole - Assenmacher - Plunk - Tavarez
    
    Wow.
    
    Joe
63.805ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 15 1995 12:4720
63.806since we're comparing 54 indiansAKOCOA::BREENTurn out the lights, the party's overThu Jun 15 1995 13:117
    That's not exactly Wynn,Lemon,Garcia and Feller with Narleski and Mossi
    in the pen.  It's a long way to Tipperary even in this shortened season
    - don't forget some of this is spring training type results (as the
    redsox know only too well).
    
    Winning begets winning but so does losing beget losing.
    
63.807ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 15 1995 13:1711
63.808MKOTS3::LONGNaw Leens is one partying town!Thu Jun 15 1995 14:167
    re 802:
    
    Put a buck on it for me.
    
    
    
    billl
63.809PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneThu Jun 15 1995 14:4915
    
    >><<< Note 63.807 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>

    
    
    >>This is off the subject, and I'm not known for that... but...
                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Damn, groaner, why don't you warn us before you put something
    ouiitrageously funny in here, I woulda wore some Depends, cause after 3
    cups o coffee, I got to laughing so hard I wish I woulda been wearing
    some...
    
    JaKe
    
63.810ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 15 1995 14:502
63.811Groaner, you're a true wizardPTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneThu Jun 15 1995 14:594
    Gosh, even someone from Clevescum figgered it out, I'm impressed.
    
    JaKe
    
63.812ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 15 1995 19:595
63.813HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 15 1995 20:2016
  I'm not sure you can ever have a choke in baseball since the probability of
any one team winning is so small. It's even smaller with the expanded playoff.
But the Indians emerged as a favorite last year and were right up there with
the Yankees as co-favorites for the A.L. Pennant in the eyes of many. 

  Were I a fan the one thing that would trouble me about the Indians is that
they are peaking awfully early. It's still only June and the pace they are
on will be difficult to maintain. I've seen many teams build up big leads
only to lose them in late summer.

  Of course the Red Sox come to mind but also the '84 Cubs who JUST hung on
then lost the NLCS to the Padres and that Phillies team from back in the 60's
that was something like 6 games up with 10 to go and didn't even make a
playoff. Others as well. 

  George 
63.814Don't put that broom away.....SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERThu Jun 15 1995 22:1518
    
    	Time for all the other teams to make up some room on the Tribe....
    The Indians don't play today.....
    
    	I'll be out in CA for the next two weeks then on vacation to the 
    cape.  So, don't expect notes from me till I get back.  
    
    	Here's to hopping that they continue on their winning ways.  I was
    really hopping they would be playing the A's while I was there but,
    both the Giants and A's are out of town for the two weeks.....what a 
    bummer.
    
    		Go Indians!
    
    	The Chief,
    		WAHOOOOOO!
    
    
63.815when the Bucketeeers look up they see PINKSMART2::CHILDSJJS the BucketsMasterFri Jun 16 1995 11:566
 That's the Soxs who peak early and then can't finish the job not the Indians.
 Didn't the Tigers start out with like 34-9 record one year to put it away
 before June?

 mike
63.816ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 16 1995 12:147
63.817ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 16 1995 12:184
63.818IMBETR::DUPREZFri Jun 16 1995 12:5820
Yeah, the '84 Tigers started 35-5.  I was reading a collection of
Tom Boswell columns about Sparky.  To paraphrase Sparky's quote at
that time, "if we don't win it all after this kind of start, I ought
to be hung..."

One thing about Sparky - he rarely leaves any room for interpretation...

Paul has a good point about teams having to play really stellar ball to
catch the Indians, although there's still a ton of time left.  Basically
the Royals are the only ones with a chance.  I wouldn't want to play the
Royals in a short series - you'd see Appier in your sleep.  And at this
rate, they have a good shot at being the wild-card team.  (Brrrr - I cringe
at even using that term in conjunction with baseball...)

Such a shame that you'll be gone for such a long time, Hal.  We'll all
really miss your insightful notes.  At least you're using the CAPS LOCK
key a little less.

Roland
63.819jays - indians final will test tribeAKOCOA::BREENTurn out the lights, the party's overFri Jun 16 1995 13:307
    Well the royals are stubbornly dogging the indians except with the
    detestable wildcard there may not be a race and no situation for the
    indians to choke (or not - I'm a fair man).
    
    if the jays get pitching straightned out they'll probalby win the east.
    Gaston is their biggest problem, I remember him leaving Stewart in to
    pitch to dyksta and almost blowing the series.
63.820ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jun 16 1995 13:5021
63.821USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jun 16 1995 14:517
>    Did I mention I thought the tribe has a good shot at winning it all
>    this year?  Good thing the Yanks and ChiSox were favored, now if the
>    indians lose, it can't be considered a choke.

If your Indians play .650 ball all the way, win their division by 10+
and have the best record in the AL and then lose in the playoffs, they'll
have choked.
63.822ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Jun 18 1995 11:4417
63.823ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Jun 18 1995 13:2817
63.824Yawn!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MGet Well MickeyMon Jun 19 1995 12:1015
    
          Well,
    
          You know this is getting boring! I mean has any team mastered a
    team like the Yankees have mastered the tribe in the past year and a
    half? What is that like 14 of the last 16 games won by the Yanks?
    
           What pitching staff? Hershiser Bahhhhhhh Grimsley Bahhhhhh
    Plunk Bahhhhhhhhhh Nagy (little Bahhh). 
    
         Don't worry Sox fans you won't be losing any P_name bets to
    Groaner this week. You see I own his space till nexted Monday!! :-)
    
    
    Boring I tell ya Boring!!!
63.825CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Mon Jun 19 1995 12:454
    Yankees ROOOL. Parade in October in the Bronx! (or is it November now?)
    Mattingly and Boggs are co-gawds.
    
    Mike
63.826ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 19 1995 12:5210
    
    Impressive series by the Yankees.  Nagy was clearly off last night,
    but the Yankees did an excellent job of capitalizing on it.
    
    And the series _did_ make an excellent case for Bud Black remaining
    with the Tribe.
    
    Congrats, Chappy
    
    Joe
63.827WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MD. A. R. R. Y. L. Mon Jun 19 1995 13:077
    
    
       Thanks Joe,
    
         Haven't seen your Buddy Paul around have ya?
    
    Chap
63.828BIGQ::MCKAYMon Jun 19 1995 16:194
    Paul was last seen running around HLO-2 beating his chest yelling
    "Pavin is god Pavin is god, how many US Opens has Norman won pal"
    
    Jimbo
63.829WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MD. A. R. R. Y. L. Mon Jun 19 1995 16:563
    
    
    :-)
63.830ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Mon Jun 19 1995 18:082
63.831HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jun 19 1995 18:229
  Not only is golf a sport, it's probably the only major sport left from the
time when the concept of sport  was was invented 4 or 5 centuries ago.

  Most kings from that period felt that sports like golf were a useless waste
of time for a young gentleman and as such were a diversion from activities they
should be practicing such as archery and sword fighting. 

  But I do agree that the Yanks suck. That goes without saying,
  George
63.832wCAMONE::WAYUSS Bonefish, SS-223, In MemoriamMon Jun 19 1995 18:5013
Golf has a longer history than any of our major sports.  In the golden age of 
sports reporting (ie early 20th century) it was one of the majors that was
always reported on.

Grantland Rice was quite the golf reporter.....


If I had a son, and could choose his talent, and could ensure that he'd be good
enough to be at the top levels of the competition, I'd pick golf in an instant.
Lots better for him, and more money, than playing d-line in football....


'Sa
63.833MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jun 19 1995 19:538
    >> Not only is golf a sport, it's probably the only major sport left 
    >> from the time when the concept of sport  was was invented 4 or 5 
    >> centuries ago.
    
       The concept of sport goes back further than 400 or 500 years. Back
       in African, Greek, Roman history thousands of years and just as far
       or further in Asian and in the histories of indigenous peoples the
       world over.
63.834ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Mon Jun 19 1995 21:344
63.835CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westMon Jun 19 1995 21:5811
    
    >The concept of sport goes back further than 400 or 500 years.
    
    For that matter, most sports do.  Basketball was played by the
    mumble-mumble indians in what is now the Southern United States well
    over 300 years ago.  However, back then it was a life and death game. 
    Thus the expression "No blood, no foul" took a whole new meaning 8^)
    
    Marc
    
    
63.836ONOFRE::MAY_BRMich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &amp;1beerTue Jun 20 1995 00:577
    
    I'd venture to say that I've spent more time on a golf course than
    anyone else in here (I am in sales, you know), however, I don't think
    golf is nearly as ol as horseracing, wrestling, or many track and field
    events.
    
    Brews
63.837CAMONE::WAYUSS Bonefish, SS-223, In MemoriamTue Jun 20 1995 14:538
I'm sorry.  I didn't mean to give the impression that I was proposing that
golf was the oldest sport.  I just wanted to say that it's pretty damned old.

Hell, the first "sport" was probably running -- away from some animal that
wanted to eat you!


'Saw
63.838Betty Ford satellite clinic under CF stands?SALEM::DODABob Kraft, man of beneficenceTue Jun 20 1995 15:5513
         <<< Note 63.827 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "D. A. R. R. Y. L. " >>>

Chap, let me guess:

D  A  R  R  Y  L
r  d  e  e  a  o
u  d  c  c  n  s
g  i  e  r  k  e
   c  n  u  e  r
   t  t  i  e
   e  l  t
   d  y  e
         d
63.839ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 20 1995 17:2924
    
    The two most important statistics for any hitter are SLG and OBP
    
    The following are the SLG and OBA for the Indians top hitters:
    
    Manny Ramirez - .675 SLG, .447 OBP
    Kenny Lofton - .482 SLG, .373 OBP
    Carlos Baerga - .502 SLG, .373 OBP
    Albert Belle - .644 SLG, .398 OBP
    Jim Thome - .677 SLG, .435 OBP
    Eddie Murray - .489 SLG, .358 OBP
    Paul Sorrento - .644 SLG, .351 OBP
    
    Anyone want to jump on the Jim Thome for MVP campaign?
    
    BTW, the stats for some other notable AL 3B:
    
    Robin Ventura - .555 SLG, .407 OBP
    Wade Boggs - .353 SLG, .376 OBP
    Gary Gaetti - .531 SLG, .325 OBP
    
    Want to bet Thome doesn't make the All-* team anyway?
    
    Joe
63.840CAMONE::WAYUSS Bonefish, SS-223, In MemoriamTue Jun 20 1995 17:3113
>    Want to bet Thome doesn't make the All-* team anyway?
>    
>    Joe


Joe, it's like George always says -- it's note the all-best-player team.

It's the all-most-popular team.....


;^)


63.841ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 20 1995 17:496
    
    Yeah, I know it.
    
    Doesn't make me happy about it...
    
    Joe
63.842CAMONE::WAYUSS Bonefish, SS-223, In MemoriamTue Jun 20 1995 17:559
>    
>    Doesn't make me happy about it...
>    

Agreed.

I never liked it when it became a fan vote-a-thon.  The sportswriters might
not ALWAYS hit the nail on the head, but I'd bet they do it a helluva lot
more than the fans.
63.843I'll make a plug for JVEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jun 20 1995 18:1718
    
>    BTW, the stats for some other notable AL 3B:
>    
>    Robin Ventura - .555 SLG, .407 OBP
>    Wade Boggs - .353 SLG, .376 OBP
>    Gary Gaetti - .531 SLG, .325 OBP
    
    What about Timmy Naehring?  ;-)

>    Anyone want to jump on the Jim Thome for MVP campaign?
    
    In seriousness, adjusting for position and as a decent-fielding SS, 
    John Valentin's offensive numbers are very nice, too.  He's the Sox' 
    MVP to date, no question.  And I don't want to hear about Fenway park
    effects, either; that JaKe Field is a bandbox...
    
    glenn
    
63.844IMBETR::DUPREZTue Jun 20 1995 18:2812
>    Anyone want to jump on the Jim Thome for MVP campaign?

Not me.

The best player on the Indians is Kenny Lofton.  Excellent defense
at an important defensive position, best leadoff man in the game,
and has surprising power.

So if you go by the "best player on the best team" rule for MVP, I think it
should be Lofton.

But Thome and Naehring should be the All-Star 3rd basemen...
63.845Thome and Sprauge for the All-Star game if I'm votinAD::HEATHDon't get to excited yetTue Jun 20 1995 18:557
    
    
      Naerhing is no all-star, some-star, no-star maybe.  Dude's a stiff.
    Those where some pretty interesting numbers Joe.  Hey Chappy what kind
    of wussy has a OB percentage higher than his SLG percentage. :*)
    
    Jerry 
63.846ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 20 1995 18:5639
    
>>    BTW, the stats for some other notable AL 3B:
>>    
>>    Robin Ventura - .555 SLG, .407 OBP
>>    Wade Boggs - .353 SLG, .376 OBP
>>    Gary Gaetti - .531 SLG, .325 OBP
    
>    What about Timmy Naehring?  ;-)

    Sorry, I forgot about him...
    
    Tim Naehring - .503 SLG, .444 OBP
    
>>    Anyone want to jump on the Jim Thome for MVP campaign?
    
>    In seriousness, adjusting for position and as a decent-fielding SS, 
>    John Valentin's offensive numbers are very nice, too.  He's the Sox' 
>    MVP to date, no question.
    
    OK, let's see - Valentin's got a .620 SLG, .431 OBP.
    
    Neither's quite as good as Thome, but as you say we're comparing
    a _very_ good fielding SS to an above average fielding 3B.  Sounds
    like the makings of a good race to me, even though neither is going
    to get many votes...
    
>    And I don't want to hear about Fenway park effects, either; that JaKe 
>    Field is a bandbox...
    
    Eh - from what I've seen of last year's numbers, while it is a hitters
    park, it's not _particularly_ so; not as much so as Fenway, at least.
    
    BTW - w.r.t. Lofton for MVP - not this year, _unless_ he starts to
    walk more often and stops the CS.  Up to this point, his offense hasn't
    been adequate for a reasonable argument to be made in his favor.
    Last year and the year before are other matters altogether, though...
    
    Joe
    
63.847WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MD. A. R. R. Y. L. Tue Jun 20 1995 19:017
    
    
        Never liked Boggs! Thank you
    
    
    
    chap
63.848Indians' candidates might self-cancel...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jun 20 1995 19:3915
>    OK, let's see - Valentin's got a .620 SLG, .431 OBP.
>    
>    Neither's quite as good as Thome, but as you say we're comparing
>    a _very_ good fielding SS to an above average fielding 3B.  Sounds
>    like the makings of a good race to me, even though neither is going
>    to get many votes...
    
    Since we're just talking the numbers to this point in time, _if_ Valentin
    were to continue on that pace, and the Red Sox on their pace (shaddup
    Chap ;-), I think JV would collect quite a few votes.  Thome, on the other 
    hand, would just get lost in a sea of Wahoo...
    
    glenn
    
63.849ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 20 1995 19:5211
    
>                 -< Indians' candidates might self-cancel... >-
    
    I'll be more surprised if it _doesn't_ happen than if it does.
    
    I'm not sure JV is well enough recognized to get MVP votes,
    at least this year.  When I suggested on the Cleveland Sports
    Mailing List that he was the clear All-* choice at SS, the
    reaction ranged from "Who?" to "Yeah, right, Cal's the man."
    
    Joe
63.850HTHMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jun 20 1995 20:006
    
      
        Clevelanders might get to see some of their guys in the
       all-star game if the PA announcer would remind the fans at
       Jacob's Field to punch the hole next to the names on the ballot 
       instead of marking x next to 'em.
63.851;-)OUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Jun 20 1995 20:010
63.852ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 20 1995 20:108
    
    I just tried that at the ESPN WWW site, and now my monitor doesn't
    seem to work...
    
    Joe
    
    (P.S. As of the latest release, Belle, Lofton, and Alomar would
     start at the all star game...)
63.853no one reads my notes anyways...ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Tue Jun 20 1995 20:124
63.854ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Tue Jun 20 1995 20:455
63.855ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Tue Jun 20 1995 20:453
63.856ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Wed Jun 21 1995 11:413
63.857MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jun 21 1995 14:244
    
       It's getting harder and harder to deny that if this Cleveland
      team doesn't at least *make* it to the World Series, it will
      have been a major choke job.
63.858OUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Wed Jun 21 1995 16:122
63.859Not only ClevelandODIXIE::ZOGRANReasonable summer ratesWed Jun 21 1995 16:344
    re .858 - Funny, that's what they are saying here in Atlanta, too.
    
    UMDan
    
63.860Holy crap! Sox win!FABSIX::E_MAXWELLKeep your SOX onThu Jun 22 1995 05:544
        Red Sox 3  cleveland 1    Gee, I guess everybody can lose.
    Even the all powerful tribe of ohio.
    
                                              Lil Ed
63.861tribe loses on purpose per orders of commishROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Thu Jun 22 1995 11:024
63.862IMBETR::DUPREZThu Jun 22 1995 12:147
RE: .861

>"Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!"

>    The CLEVELAND INDIANS ARE THE MOST POWERFUL TEAM IN THE UNIVERSE.

Are you on medication for this?  :-)
63.863Ohio TourismSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOThu Jun 22 1995 12:446
The State of Ohio is apparently trying to increase their tourism this year
by infusing funds into their new slogan:

"If you forget Cleveland, it's a nice state!"

zamboni
63.864PTOSS1::JACOBRWaiting for it in the mail!!Thu Jun 22 1995 13:536
    re.863
    
    finally, the rest of Ohio wises up.
    
    JaKe
    
63.865Have you been fibbin to us Paul????AD::HEATHTribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way)Thu Jun 22 1995 15:0415
    
    
      That reminds me......On Monday I was listening to the Gary Taungay
    show on WWTM out of Wooostah and he had as a guest the baseball writer
    from the Cleveland Plain Dealer on.  He was a very knowledgeable guy
    and for a beat writer very honest about the team chances (with the
    Indians saying they'll win it is being honest) and the discussion got
    around to Jacobs Field.  He was discribing how much of a beautiful
    park it is and all its super gadgets like the huge weightroom, pool
    ect. and this is as close to a direct quote as I can remember....
    "When you walk into Jacobs field it is not at all like Cleveland,
    it is beautiful"  does this mean the rest of Cleveland is a total
    dump?  Could some of you Clevelanders' help me out?
    
    Jerry
63.866ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Thu Jun 22 1995 19:286
63.867MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Jun 22 1995 19:445
    
       Mass./Boston folks don't mind you making fun of our home state
      half as much as you mind us making fun of Cleveland. Of course,
      that could be because you chose to live here in Mass. whereas folks
      like myself wouldn't move to Cleveland for any reason.
63.868Nice try AlvinROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Thu Jun 22 1995 20:326
63.869ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Thu Jun 22 1995 20:333
63.870Been there?AKOCOA::BREENThu Jun 22 1995 21:087
    Been there?
    
    	we've got three divisions and a alc in 8 prior, in till 9/20 in '91
    and at least some action into the all star game in other years.
    
    	Even in our last full season - awful by our standards we were as
    good as cleveland, or only as bad.
63.871ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Thu Jun 22 1995 21:314
63.872MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jun 23 1995 13:023
    
       Po' po' Groaner. Driven to defend a city that he chooses not
     to live in. 
63.873ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 23 1995 13:2413
    
    Chooses not to live in?
    
    As if there's much of a choice in the matter.
    
    Given the choice between doing the job I have now in MA and the
    job I have now in Cleveland, I'd take Cleveland every time.
    
    Of course, the job I have now doesn't _exist_ in Cleveland (trust
    me, I looked), so it's not really a relevant question.
    
    Joe (who'd still much rather live in MA then CA or AZ or someplace
         like that...)
63.874CAMONE::WAYUSS Bonefish, SS-223, In MemoriamFri Jun 23 1995 13:4026
I like living where I live.

It's expensive sometimes (like when I pull up to the gas pump) but there's a
sense of family roots here that is strong, and a sense of history that I feel
and I haven't begun to explore it yet.

Some folks yearn to go someplace else.  I've never felt that way.  My brother
does -- he'd love to move south.  But I never have felt that.

My family has been here since 1630, which is a long time.  I like the feeling
that gives me.

I've seen lots of changes just in the short time I've lived.  There's lots more
yuppies and "plastic folks" around now than ever before, as if they'd been
drawn here by the magnetic pull of big money in Hartford and New Haven and
Stamford and Greenwich, and you have to look harder and harder to find the real
people of the state.   The plain folks who don't wear tennis clothes around the 
center of downtown just to look fashionable.   The plain folks who don't drive
Volvo's and Saabs.

I like it here, and I think I'll stay here, and I can only hope that the
plastic people don't completely overrun those of us who were here long before
they came.....


'Saw
63.875MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jun 23 1995 14:4813
    
    
         Of course, Joe the difference between you and Paul is that
        *you* aren't constantly ragging on Mass./Boston. That in and
         of itself is no big deal because this sure ain't no Utopia
         and most of us can take it as well as dish it (unlike Paul)
         but it seems kind of foolish for someone who isn't being
         forced to live here. If I had as big a problem with this 
         area as Paul pretends to, I sure as hell wouldn't live here.
    
         No sense in wasting any more space in this here note on this
         subject seeing as how the Indians are the hottest thing going 
         right now. Off to the junk note with it.
63.876PTOSS1::JACOBROfficial 'Yanni' Survivor!!!Fri Jun 23 1995 15:047
    Won't it be nice when September comes and Groaner will have to return
    to third grade and won't be able to obnoxiously note so damned
    much!!!!!
    
    
    JaKe
    
63.877don't knock it unless you've tried itOUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Fri Jun 23 1995 15:484
63.878OUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Fri Jun 23 1995 15:494
63.879ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 23 1995 16:0811
    
>                   -< don't knock it unless you've tried it >-

>>    Joe (who'd still much rather live in MA then CA or AZ or someplace
>>         like that...)
    
    Unless AZ has suddenly (a) started getting at least 2' of snow
    a year and (b) started staying under 100 for most of the summer,
    and I haven't heard about it, I'll continue knocking it...
    
    Joe
63.880OUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Fri Jun 23 1995 17:3610
63.881ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 23 1995 18:0814
    
    Mike,
    
    I like my ignorance - keeps me from getting arrogant... B^)
    
    I _have_ been to AZ, actually, but only to the areas where 7' of
    snow would be a good hint of an ongoing major ice age.
    
    Let me restate - at least 2' of snow a year reasonably close to
    sea level.
    
    Can't stand skiing, personally...
    
    Joe 
63.882OUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Fri Jun 23 1995 18:375
63.883the losers pname says it all -> full of angerROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Fri Jun 23 1995 18:4837
63.884I was .45 min away from snow in the winter by the wayAD::HEATHTribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way)Fri Jun 23 1995 19:117
    
    
      Well Mike.....I have lived in Tucson and Boston.  I would choose New
    England over that oven in a second.  I don't want to hear about dry 
    heat either.  I didn't believe it then and won't now. 
    
    Jerry
63.885The Crazy Sandbagger, Jr.MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jun 23 1995 19:3213
    
      re. 883
    
      Groaner, take away the indoor soccer title that you were puffing 
      your chest about and your Cleveland teams have a total of zero
      titles in your lifetime. That's zero. Zip. Zilch. None. Nada.
      Nein. Not one. Not any. The big donut. The goose egg. An airball.
      Batting .000. Stuck at the starting gate. Rowing with one oar. 
      We're on the road to nowhere...Your so used to losing that you 
      don't have the stones to step forward and admit that the Indians 
      are the odds-on to take it all and if they don't it'll be a choke 
      job.
    
63.886is he dumb or stupid?ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Fri Jun 23 1995 19:3821
63.887PTOSS1::JACOBRWaiting fer the mailFri Jun 23 1995 19:4510
    
    
    >>		 But what else is new... you never met a fact that you
    >>didn't manipulate or create.
    
    Sheesh, Groaner, sounds like a truly accurate description of you, more
    than a description of tommy.
    
    JaKe
    
63.888CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westFri Jun 23 1995 19:5326
    
    People should feel free to modify this, but certainly it should provide
    us with at least another 100 replies 8^)
    
    I choose to define "recent past" as the last 10 years, and Ancient past
    as older than that time period.
    
    			Today	Recent Past	Ancient Past	Total
    			-----	-----------	------------	-----
    Basketball		Cavs	Cavs		Celtics		 2C - 1B
    Baseball            Indians	Red sox		Red Sox		 1C - 2B
    Football            even	Cleveland	Cleveland	 2C - 0B
    Hockey              HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA	 0C - 3B
    College Sports      Boston	Boston		Boston		 0C - 3B
    Other               Clev.	even		Boston		 1C - 1B
    
    		So my totals come out to:
    
    		 6 points for Cleveland
    		10 points for Boston 
    		 2 even points
    
    Have fun 8^)
    
    Marc
    
63.889WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MD. A. R. R. Y. L. Fri Jun 23 1995 19:568
    
    
       BTW
    
    Nashua NH = ARM PIT OF New England
    
    
    Chap
63.890PTOSS1::JACOBRWaiting fer the mailFri Jun 23 1995 19:594
    Northeast Ohio==butthole of the world....Clevescum way up that butthole
    
    JaKe
    
63.891OUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Fri Jun 23 1995 20:074
63.892ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Fri Jun 23 1995 20:187
63.893MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jun 23 1995 20:243
    
      In the past ten years Boston has had a team in the NBA championship
     (and won), the SB and the WS. Cleveland has not. Nuff said.
63.894ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Fri Jun 23 1995 20:327
63.895IMBETR::DUPREZFri Jun 23 1995 20:4912
>    Nashua NH = ARM PIT OF New England
 
I suppose greater metro Westminster was better?

Stay out of French Hill and the tree streets and the rest of Nashua
is great.  Same can be said of most cities - there are one or two bad
spots.

I hate to digress, but let's talk about the Indians.  What is the rotation
now?  Last I heard, Clark went to the minors, and Ogea went into the rotation.
What has happened to that stiff Grimsley?
63.896CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westFri Jun 23 1995 20:599
    >What did you have to eat for dinner on June 22nd, 1987... ten years
    >recents past...
    
    Lasagne, chips, diet pepsi, cake and a lot of good friends over for
    dinner.  That was the day I graduated high school.  Would you like to
    know the weather and/or the movie that played on TV that night too?
    
    Marc
    
63.897MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Fri Jun 23 1995 21:467
	re -1:

	You've obviously never been to Lowell, Ma and New Haven, Ct



	billl
63.898ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Sat Jun 24 1995 12:3819
63.899ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Sun Jun 25 1995 21:354
63.900ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Jun 26 1995 11:086
63.901News at 11!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Mon Jun 26 1995 12:363
    
    
    Indians are Reeling...
63.902ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 26 1995 12:5714
    
    Reeling?  No.
    
    Slumping?  Decidely.
    
    The injury bug seems to have hit; Hershiser's on the DL, and Nagy's
    pitching like he should be.  Combine this with Black returning to early
    season form, and it meant trouble.
    
    Also, this weekend demonstrated nicely the reason why it's still
    Chicago that worries me, and not KC.  Chicago has the arms, and more
    offense.
    
    Joe
63.903ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jun 26 1995 19:166
63.904WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Mon Jun 26 1995 19:3912
             ,,=============.. 
             ||             ||
        =====||             ||
        =====||   White     ||
        =====||    Sox      ||
             ||             ||
             ``============='' 
    
    
                         
    	Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear!
63.905WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Mon Jun 26 1995 19:449
    
    
          BTW Groaner, if you wan't to lose another P_name bet I told you
    what the conditions were I'd accept? Whoever made it farther in the
    playoffs? Now the Yanks are just a third place team? You can't lose
    not with that LEAGUE LEADING PITCHING STAFF that Cleveland possesses.
    
    
       What's it gonna be boy!!
63.906ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jun 26 1995 19:498
63.907MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jun 26 1995 19:558
        
    >> Sure, I'll accept the pname wager.  Team with better record at the
    >> end of the regular season - 1 week of pname.  Cool.  You're on.
    
       I haven't seen anyone with thus little faith in a very good team     
       since TCM tried to tell us that he was still nervous when the
       Rangers were up 3-1 in the CUP finals against Vancouver. I guess
       a 4 game losing streak will do that to you, eh, Groaner?
63.908USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jun 26 1995 20:329
>    Summary - starting staff is strong now and should only get better.
>    Good news for the rest of the AL.

Same was said about the ChiSox a couple of years ago.  McDowell is gone,
and Fernandez (4.87), Bere (5.48) and Alvarez (5.78) aren't currently
what everyone thought they'd be, are they ?

If I were a GM I'd be very reluctant to bank on long-term consistency
from pitchers.  Very few provide it.
63.909ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jun 26 1995 20:348
63.910ONOFRE::MAY_BRMich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &amp;1beerMon Jun 26 1995 22:5015
    
      <<< Note 63.883 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!" >>>
    
   >   People who do have a clue, have consistently ranked Cleveland in the   
   > top 10 most liveable cities in the country.  Yes, Boston has also be   
   > listed in the top 10, but Boston is Boston and I doubt very much that
    
    Every night I go home to "the most liveable city in the World," it must
    be true because Scottsdale was voted that  by this group, and it says
    it on the sign on the way into town.  On the other hand, some people
    say it's too hot, like Joe, and don't want to live here.  I figure
    anyone who doesn't ski but till lives where they have shovel snow don't
    belong in my town anyway.  8^)
    
    brew   
63.911ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameTue Jun 27 1995 11:1014
63.912ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 27 1995 12:3414
    
>    Now I can see why Hargrove wouldn't take my advice and put Ogea
>    in the rotation to start the season
    
    Oh, come on.  Hargrove rightly gets blasted for some things (hitting
    Vizquel 2nd being #1 among them), but his record of player development
    _is_ impressive.  Since he's managed the Indians, Lofton, Baerga,
    Belle, Thome, Ramirez, Sorrento, and Kirby have become starters
    for the Indians, and he's now showing some ability to develop pitchers.
    He might not develop them quite as quickly as we might hope, but
    making an overnight success of a control pitcher in the majors _isn't_
    easy.
    
    Joe
63.913ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameTue Jun 27 1995 12:575
63.914Buck Buck ByuuuckkWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Tue Jun 27 1995 12:5811
    
    
         Groaner I understand your afraid of the Yankees sweeping the Tribe
    in the playoffs as you know we own the tribe. So I'll stop asking you
    about the P_name bet I'll let you off the hook.
    
       Noone but Groaner read after this Form Feed please?
    
           And I won't tell your Sports Brethren Your a COWARD!!!
    
    Chap
63.915Hamstring?VERBOS::NAZZAROBring ALexi Lalas to Boston!Tue Jun 27 1995 13:263
    How bad was Lofton hurt?
    
    NAZZ
63.916ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 27 1995 13:372
    
    Haven't heard.
63.917ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameTue Jun 27 1995 18:145
63.918Joe help him will ya....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Tue Jun 27 1995 18:2016
    
    
        Read my lips....
    
       IF Cleveland makes the playoffs and the Yankees don't you win.
         Vica Versa I win. (yeah right with that loaded Cleveland
    powerhouse)
    
        If we both make the playoffs, (this is where it may get difficult
    for a country boy like you) WHOEVER GETS FARTHER IN THE PLAYOFFS WINS
    the bet.
    
         Hopefully we'll meet head to head in the ALCS Part Duex!!
    
    
    Chap
63.919ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 27 1995 19:576
    
    I'll take that pname bet, Chappy.
    
    Also, w.r.t. Lofton - he's day to day.
    
    Joe
63.920'95 Tribe = '78 Red SoxUSCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jun 27 1995 20:054
>    Also, w.r.t. Lofton - he's day to day.

Hershiser, now Lofton....  You knew the joy ride would end sooner or
later.
63.921ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 27 1995 20:1112
    
>>    Also, w.r.t. Lofton - he's day to day.

>Hershiser, now Lofton....  You knew the joy ride would end sooner or
>later.
    
    Oh, come on.  Neither's a terribly significant injury; Hershiser's
    injury is likely to do more to _help_ the team, long term, than
    hurt it (in that it provides opportunities for young pitchers to
    develop).
    
    Joe
63.922ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameTue Jun 27 1995 21:163
63.923ONOFRE::MAY_BRMich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &amp;1beerWed Jun 28 1995 01:234
    
    Like a tue Clevelander, Groaner bows to the pressure...
    
    brews
63.924WS losses DON'T COUNT!ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jun 28 1995 02:257
63.925ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jun 28 1995 11:1526
63.926WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Wed Jun 28 1995 13:0211
    
    
        Joe, sorry this is personal.
    
          Just the P_name bet with Groaner will be sufficient.
    
    
     I'll have a real good one for ya Groanie!!! :-)
    
    
    Chap
63.927ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jun 28 1995 13:113
63.928go figure...MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Jun 28 1995 14:139
	Another interesting tidbit from Jimbo lasted night...

	Groaner actually has a mother...

	And she LIKES him!



	billl
63.929BIGQ::MCKAYWed Jun 28 1995 15:073
    guilty as charged!
    
    Jimbo
63.930USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jun 28 1995 15:426
>>Hershiser, now Lofton....  You knew the joy ride would end sooner or
>>later.
    
>    Oh, come on.  Neither's a terribly significant injury

Maybe.  But more will follow....
63.931Where did this HALogic come from? ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jun 28 1995 16:4610
    
>    Its not like Ogea throws in the 70s you know... he does have an 85-88
>    mph heater... just like Greg Maddux.
    
    Thousands upon thousands of young men across this country have 85-88
    MPH heaters... NOT just like Greg Maddux.
    
    
    glenn
    
63.932ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 28 1995 18:0812
    
> Maybe.  But more will follow....
    
    Yes, I expect they will.  Your point being?
    
    Other than Carlos Baerga, there's no player they can't replace
    with a major league level player on offense (well, catcher, but
    they've been living with that all year and Alomar's almost back),
    and the Indians have lots of reasonable choices among pitcher,
    even without resorting to a trade.
    
    Joe
63.933ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jun 28 1995 19:403
63.934ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jun 28 1995 19:418
63.935IMBETR::DUPREZWed Jun 28 1995 19:4711
>    If Lofton goes on the DL, big
>    deal... Kirby can fill in for a while and I'm sure Burnitz would get 
>    called up.

Isn't Burnitz the same guy you thought was dead weight a bunch of replies
back?  I agreed at the time, and my opinion hasn't changed.

Kirby's a good player, but he's not Kenny Lofton.  With Lofton only having
a sore hamstring, he doesn't have to be.

Just hope Lofton doesn't turn into Jeffrey Hamstring(tm) of the Orioles.
63.936you can wish them away all you want, its a LOCKROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jun 28 1995 19:5311
63.937USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jun 28 1995 19:559
>    Yes, I expect they will.  Your point being?

That they've marched through the first 1/3 of the year unscathed.
The Yanks had a very good year last year and only DL'd players
10 times.  This year they're already at 6.  It's no coincidence that
the Indians have had a good start while none of their key players
have been hurt.  Injuries happen.  Let's see how well they play
when they're missing a good player for a while.  If all this
"no-name" depth produces, I'll tip my hat to them.
63.938Indians won't go from .700 to .300EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jun 28 1995 20:008
    Sure, the Indians may slide a bit, but it's all over in the AL Central.  
    They can coast home rather easily.  As far as any injuries are concerned, 
    the only ones that matter are the ones still present in late September,
    heading into October...
    
    glenn
    
63.939MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jun 28 1995 20:066
      
    >> -< you can wish them away all you want, its a LOCK >-
    
       There you have it! Vegas said so and now Groaner backs it up.
       If the Indians don't win, it will have been a major choke job.    
    
63.940ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jun 28 1995 20:0610
63.941ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jun 28 1995 20:075
63.942ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 28 1995 20:096
    
    Any anyway, Joe, the Tribe doesn't get most of its production from
    players who are past their prime, and therefore more likely to
    be injured... B^)
    
    Joe
63.943MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jun 28 1995 20:179
    
      >> Are you a choke expert or something?
    
         Don't hafta be no expert. Vegas has made the Indians the
         the odds on favorite, they've got the best record in base-
         ball and you've said yourself that "it's a lock". The only
         thing holding this admittedly excellent ball club back is
         the old chicken bone.
    
63.944EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jun 28 1995 20:2011
                    
>    Sure, this might not compare to the injuries of other teams,
>    but this is still not ZERO.  The starting catcher, and all star,
>    the #3 starter and top starter from last year.
    
    But Sandy Alomar's always injured, and perpetually a (disabled) 
    All-Star because ignorant voters confuse him with his brother, so 
    you can't count his injury as working against the status quo...
    
    glenn
    
63.945HahahahaMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jun 28 1995 20:2810
    
  >> But Sandy Alomar's always injured, and perpetually a (disabled) 
  >> All-Star because ignorant voters confuse him with his brother, so 
  >> you can't count his injury as working against the status quo...
    
     A more skeptical person might dismiss Groaner's reasoning as the
     excuse-making of a fan conditioned to defeat and despair. But not 
     me, I know his reasonings are based on sound statistical analysis 
     and historic precedent. 
    
63.946IMBETR::DUPREZWed Jun 28 1995 20:3050
>    Comparing Lofton who is day-to-day with a hamstring pull to Hammonds
>    is ridiculous.  Gee, I hope Aaron Sele doesn't turn into a guy who
>    is always on the DL with shoulder problems.  What is the basis for the
>    comment comparing Hammonds and Lofton?

I suggest a reading comprehension course.

I said:
	Just hope Lofton doesn't turn into Jeffrey Hamstring(tm) of the Orioles.

I didn't say he was Hammonds.  I said to hope he didn't turn into him.
Hammonds is a guy who has all the potential in the world, but constantly
has nagging injuries that don't end his career, but keep him from using his
talents to the Orioles advantage.  Some guys, for whatever reason, seem to
be tightly wound (for lack of a better phrase), and end up with a lot of these
type of injuries.  Lofton hasn't been like that so far, but I'm saying to
hope it doesn't happen.  I think sustained absences on his part would hurt
the Indians offense more than the loss of *any* other player on that team.
He's the best leadoff hitter in baseball - his OBP and speed make a lot of
things possible for the 3-4-5 hitters.

And, in keeping with the style of some of your notes...

FLAME ON

Lighten up.  I've been trying to add some objective comments about the Indians
all along the way this year.  I haven't been overly critical, and I haven't
been bandwagon jumping.  This obviously doesn't sit well with you.

>    The more garbage like this that pops up, the more garbage this
>    notesfile is going to receive when the Indians take it all this year.

It's a comment.  "Garbage" is a false list of "eliminated teams" every couple
of days.  You want to chest-thump because the Indians are doing well?  Great -
as a long-time Tribe fan you deserve to.  You want to encourage HAL and his
caps lock spasms?  Fine - when your team is doing great you want to share the
joy with other fans.  But after some of the replies you've put in here,
misreading someone else's comment (either intentionally or not) and calling it
"garbage" is an extreme case of the pot calling the kettle black.

I didn't "wish them away".  I made a statement.  Please try to check your
paranoia at the door.

FLAME OFF

RE: Sele.  He *is* turning into a guy with shoulder problems.  He was having
some troubles last year, and he's been out a good portion of this year.  If
I were a GM right now, I'm not sure I'd want any part of him in a deal.

Roland
63.947ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 28 1995 20:3411
    
    w.r.t. Alomar
    
    Well, yes and no.  It all depends upon the rest of the season;
    while he hasn't remained healthy for a full season, he hasn't
    miss a full season either.
    
    And anyway, just because an injury is expected doesn't mean that
    it doesn't hurt the team.
    
    Joe
63.948ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jun 28 1995 20:355
63.949ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jun 28 1995 20:3825
63.950HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jun 28 1995 21:003
  What's the story with Nagy? He seems to be off a bit lately.

  George
63.951ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 28 1995 21:086
    
    He has been; I haven't heard _anything_ though, so I suspect he
    was simply overused sometime a month back, and is suffering from
    that.
    
    Joe
63.952they only way they don't win it all is the umps...ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jun 29 1995 00:032
63.953NL sips... (minor leagues)ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jun 29 1995 00:046
63.954PTOSS1::JACOBRNOTFabio,&amp; I don't play him on TVThu Jun 29 1995 02:2510
    re-1
    
    waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, waaaaaaaaaaah
    
    AL stands fer "Almost League". so whaddya expect ya freakin' crybaby.
    
    they play tainted baseball, what with the designated pansy.
    
    JaKe
    
63.955ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jun 29 1995 11:072
63.956ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jun 29 1995 11:075
63.957CAMONE::WAYUSS Bonefish, SS-223, In MemoriamThu Jun 29 1995 12:335
I like watching the Red Sox play in Fenway, but on any given night I'd rather
see an NL game.....


'Saw
63.958WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Thu Jun 29 1995 12:417
    
    
        Funny that worst team in baseball your talking about went into the
    Jake by the lake and kicked some Native American Butt!!
    
    
    Chap
63.959ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jun 29 1995 13:293
63.960EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Jun 29 1995 13:2913
           
> I like watching the Red Sox play in Fenway, but on any given night I'd rather
> see an NL game.....
    
    Any game in Fenway or Wrigley is better than any game anywhere else...
    
    Reportedly the AL owners are considering dumping the Designated Geek.
    Here's hoping they do.  That would leave the NL as superior only in 
    Total Artificiality...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.961HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 29 1995 14:188
  I heard they were thinking of dumping the DH as well but that they felt
they might get flack from the players union since a number of veterans depend
on the DH for their livelihood.

  If I were MLB, I'd get a contract inked before picking another fight with
the union.

  George
63.962USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jun 29 1995 14:515
>  If I were MLB, I'd get a contract inked before picking another fight with
>the union.

This is far from over.  When the players finally accept the realities of
the market, a deal will get done.
63.963HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 29 1995 18:508
RE                    <<< Note 63.962 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>This is far from over.  When the players finally accept the realities of
>the market, a deal will get done.

  ... when the owners accept the reality of the market a deal will get done.

  George
63.964Owners fought a fairly good fight, just simply lostAKOCOA::BREENThu Jun 29 1995 19:359
    When the owners accept the fact that they lost that will be a start. 
    Actually I'm reading the thing that's holding up a deal is internal
    fighting amongst the owners.
    
    I'm thinking to myself that putting the "tax" money into the
    championship pool and then dividing it by salary (ratios) may be an
    idea worth thinking about.  Problem is it goes against the network
    thinking which is based on mediocrity which has been the credo of tv
    for 35 years now.
63.965EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Jun 29 1995 19:3811
    
> This is far from over.  When the players finally accept the realities of
> the market, a deal will get done.
    
    Yeah, that's pretty much a direct contradiction, Joe; "the realities
    of the market" is exactly what the players are demanding.  And, yes,
    it could be one of those beware-of-what-you-ask-for situations, but
    nonetheless, the market is what they want...
    
    glenn
    
63.966you know it's coming...USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jun 29 1995 20:0614
>> This is far from over.  When the players finally accept the realities of
>> the market, a deal will get done.
    
>    Yeah, that's pretty much a direct contradiction, Joe; "the realities
>    of the market" is exactly what the players are demanding.

Yeah, and when they returned to the market in April, they immediately
started crying "collusion" 'cause they weren't getting their automatic
hikes based on comparisons of their stats with others of like ability.

"realities of the market" indeed....

Wait 'til they claim this off-season that the owners somehow master-minded
the low fan turnout to undermine the business and further restrict salaries...
63.967HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 29 1995 20:359
  Clearly it's the owners who don't want to go along with the realities of the
market. They are the ones asking for a cap and they are the ones trying to
expand when the bottom layer of the teams they have are not making money. 

  All the players are asking is that there be no cap and that they can
negotiate with teams on a player by player basis. They are totally in favor of
a free market system. 

  George
63.968Just stop Selig is the answerAKOCOA::BREENThu Jun 29 1995 21:0517
    George,
    	Apparently everyone including a majority of owners now know they
    can't force their castor oil down the players throat and in addition
    when the fans blame the players they show there anger by not buying the
    tickets and watching the games which the owners need to pay said-same
    players strategy.
    
    	The big problem still remains that a minority coalition of small
    market owners is now holding us all hostage and are willing to destroy
    "big" league baseball as we know and make it a minor league sport since
    Selig and the others are in minor leagues location-wise themselves.
    
    	As you know all of their problems could be solved in one fell swoop
    by engendering free market competition and allowing the pittsburghs and
    milwaukees to move where the action is (Atlanticcoast/ Buffalo-Hamilton, 
    Florida; even Central Michigan) and put Triple-A+ independent minor
    league teams in those towns.
63.969HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 29 1995 21:1523
RE                      <<< Note 63.968 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    	Apparently everyone including a majority of owners now know they
>    can't force their castor oil down the players throat and in addition
>    when the fans blame the players they show there anger by not buying the
>    tickets and watching the games which the owners need to pay said-same
>    players strategy.
    
  I think it's a bit of a leap to say that the fans are blaming the players.
Some fans blame the players, certainly the more vocal fans. Other fans blame
the owners, and some blame both. 

  Other fans, especially those that were marginal to begin with, are not really
blaming either side, they just lost interest and wandered off because there was
no World Series. 

  In any case, it's the owners, in the long run, who are going to lose and it's
those minority owners who stand to lose the most. The Yankees and Dodgers will
survive no matter what happens, they have the money and fan base to ride out
the storm, but if teams like Pittsburgh and Milwaukee don't straighten out and
cut a deal with the players, they risk serious financial problems. 

  George 
63.970Can you imagine playing World Series for money?AKOCOA::BREENThu Jun 29 1995 21:227
    My point is no matter who they're blaming the result is less revenue
    which = less profits to the owners.  The trickle down to < $ for
    players comes later.
    
    NO, Milburgh just can't compete in the open market.  I suggested
    elsewhere that throwing the "tax" into the winners pool might be a
    solution but unfortunately corporate minds no longer think that way.
63.971ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jun 30 1995 11:308
63.972Indians clinch WS title... film at 11ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jun 30 1995 11:354
63.973ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 30 1995 12:306
    
    Paul,
    
    Omar Vizquel is still a hole in the lineup.
    
    Joe
63.974ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jun 30 1995 12:373
63.975ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 30 1995 12:427
    
    OBA - .322
    SLG - .321
    
    If that's not a hole in the lineup, I don't know what is.
    
    Joe
63.976USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jun 30 1995 14:2315
>  In any case, it's the owners, in the long run, who are going to lose and it's
>those minority owners who stand to lose the most.

No matter what happens each ONE of these owners will still be wealthy.
And all of the superstars will be wealthy.  BUT, the middle-piddle and
young not-yet-proven players are the ones who will get hurt.

Much has been made of the split between small- and big-market owners,
but there may surface a split between the few elite big-money players
and the masses.  No matter how this is settled (yes, even in a completely
free system), the gulf between superstar and everyone else will be huge.

The owners will have lost a lot of money, and the majority of players
will have lost a lot of money (some their jobs), and they'll all look
back and wonder why they pushed the sport over the cliff.
63.977USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jun 30 1995 14:255
>    Bad news for the rest of the AL, Sandy Alomar was activated last night. 
>    With him batting 9th (yes 9th) there are NO holes in the Indians
>    line-up.  

Anyone got career numbers on this hole-plugger ?
63.978MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jun 30 1995 14:3010
  >> No matter what happens each ONE of these owners will still be wealthy.
  >> And all of the superstars will be wealthy.  BUT, the middle-piddle and 
  >> young not-yet-proven players are the ones who will get hurt.
    
     All you ever heard from the folks that sympathize for the owners was
     that mediocre ball players were vastly overpaid. Now that those sal-
     aries are being adjusted, it's those self-same owner-sympathizers that
     want to point to that fact as eveidence that the players are hurting
     the game/themselves/western civilization. Go figure.
63.979ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 30 1995 14:389
    
    Don't have the exact numbers, but they're ~.270 BA, ~.400 SLG
    Take out a disasterous, injury ridden 1991, and they're even better
    than that.
    
    Alomar's not a big offensive plus at catcher (though he _is_ a small
    one), but he certainly does fill a hole.
    
    Joe
63.980Clemens as player-rep vs Joe Kliene in nba\AKOCOA::BREENFri Jun 30 1995 16:2311
    Joe, we're now seeing the split between mega-star - 8-12 in the nba
    with the latter trying to ram an agreement thru and missing.  The
    acrimony in the mlb has masked a potential split amongst the players.
    The differnece as I mentioned elsewhere is that in the mlb it is the
    high priced players doing the negotiating (ironically because of the
    negative action by owners against labor reps - how sweet it is).
    
    Interesting subject for an article comparing labor success to how
    ownership treats the player-reps: I'd guess some of the nba reps were
    taken care of to encourage the middle players to take the job over the
    stars.
63.981USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jun 30 1995 18:0021
>     All you ever heard from the folks that sympathize for the owners was
>     that mediocre ball players were vastly overpaid.

They are, and this is where the adjustments must be made... (so...)


>Now that those sal-
>     aries are being adjusted, it's those self-same owner-sympathizers that
>     want to point to that fact as eveidence that the players are hurting
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>     the game/themselves/western civilization. Go figure.


Is that what I was saying ???  Classic example of reading what you want
to hear.   Take note people !!

In .976 all I was responding to was George's claim that "it's the owners,
in the long run...who stand to lose the most."  How is it that these
millionaires are going to be hurt "most" ?  Most, if not all, have their
fortunes outside of baseball.  Quite the opposite for the players, except
for the superstars (as I stated).
63.982HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 30 1995 18:1618
RE                    <<< Note 63.981 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>In .976 all I was responding to was George's claim that "it's the owners,
>in the long run...who stand to lose the most."  How is it that these
>millionaires are going to be hurt "most" ?  Most, if not all, have their
>fortunes outside of baseball.  Quite the opposite for the players, except
>for the superstars (as I stated).

  Well I suppose if you feel money is everything you have a point but from a
baseball point of view the owners on the bottom rung, those making the most
noise and causing the most trouble, are likely to end up losing their teams
because of the mess they have created.

  Most likely they will sell them for $200 million each and walk away with
money falling out of their pockets unless they have other bills to pay, but
they will no longer be baseball owners. 

  George
63.983I'd play Pena..........reallyAD::HEATHTribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way)Fri Jun 30 1995 19:1711
    
    
    
      Paul....
    
      You mean Sandy Alomar is going to fill a hole.  He is the most
    over-rated pro athlete in sports today.  The only reason he makes
    the mid season classic is because the casual/voting fan gets him
    confused with his brother.
    
    Jerry
63.984USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jun 30 1995 20:544
>  Well I suppose if you feel money is everything you have a point

That's what this labor problem is all about.  It's certainly not about
the length of games or the height of the pitcher's mound.
63.985HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 30 1995 21:2815
RE                    <<< Note 63.984 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>That's what this labor problem is all about.  It's certainly not about
>the length of games or the height of the pitcher's mound.

  No, this labor problem is not about money itself. It's about the right of
the players to negotiate with teams about their salary.

  And the low end owners are not just complaining about money, they are
complaining about having the ability to own and operate their teams. They
claim they can not survive as baseball teams without a cap. With this strike
they have put owning their teams at far greater risk than if they had cut
a deal with the players and avoided the strike.

  George
63.986Money is what matters for both sidesBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredFri Jun 30 1995 22:2812
                     <<< Note 63.985 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>

>  No, this labor problem is not about money itself. It's about the right of
>the players to negotiate with teams about their salary.
> .....
>  George

	George, this whole thing is about money.  Do you think the players are
	demanding to be able to negotiate with other teams in the hopes of
	getting a pay cut?  No matter what business it is, it's business.

	Kevin
63.987ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jun 30 1995 22:535
63.988ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jun 30 1995 22:544
63.989ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsSat Jul 01 1995 11:1420
    
>    You mean Sandy Alomar is going to fill a hole.  He is the most
>    over-rated pro athlete in sports today.  The only reason he makes
>    the mid season classic is because the casual/voting fan gets him
>    confused with his brother.
    
    Overrated?  Well, maybe by all-star voters, but in general he's
    been a very good catcher -when he's been healthy-.  He's an above
    average hitter for a catcher, and above average defensively.  As
    to the idea of starting Pena, I wouldn't in a million years - I'd
    have started Levis over Pena, but for some reason Hargrove doesn't 
    like Levis.  Pena's still an effective backup, but has nothing
    left to offer as a starter.
    
    Joe
    
    w.r.t. 3000 hits; how many current Indians will finish their careers
    with 3000 hits?  I'd guess four - Winfield & Murray, of course, plus
    Baerga & Ramirez.
    
63.990ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSat Jul 01 1995 11:447
63.991ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSun Jul 02 1995 12:183
63.992ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jul 03 1995 11:5214
63.993You all really care about this, right?MUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Mon Jul 03 1995 15:2017
This is an entertaining thread.  It fascinates me how Groaner drags the
rest of you down to his argumentation level.

My pal Jeff and I dropped the White Sox as our AL team after the first three
weeks, because we got sick of watching them kick the ball around, and went
with the Indians.  Been a lot of fun, and I've always loved watching Orel
Hershiser pitch.  Looks funny in that Indian uniform, though.

In the NL, which has lesser players but better ball, we went with Atlanta,
except while I was in the States, figuring I could watch the Braves on TBS.
For those  4 weeks we took the Giants, whose defense is a pure joy to watch.

Our guiding principle in each league is:  the best team playing on grass.

And we hope they can the DH, too.

Steve
63.994ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameTue Jul 04 1995 21:065
63.995ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 06 1995 11:218
63.1000heiser is a clown!ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 06 1995 11:234
63.1001I'd hardley call 7-2 a stiff with a better era than MartinezAD::HEATHTribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way)Thu Jul 06 1995 12:298
    
    
    
      I thought Martinez did make the team?  If he didn't he got stiffed
    but don't be callin Hanson a stiff.  I know what you really said about
    him.
    
    Jerry
63.1002Open mouth insert (stinky)FootWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Thu Jul 06 1995 12:357
    
    
        Martinez is on the team. Groaner you are the biggest fountain of
    misinformation I have ever seen.!
    
    
    Chap
63.1003AKOCOA::BREENThu Jul 06 1995 17:467
    Steve do you get a choice of teams to pick up on cable?  I agree, nl
    more entertaining even with a lesser talent base.  Ironically the
    stupid dh rule leads to tougher pitching in the al.  Emphasis on
    fastball in nl sometimes distorts player averages.
    
    Now the Indians will have to decide which players to keep in the next
    few years.
63.1004ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 06 1995 21:087
63.1005Frankie and trash for Aggie may not be a panic move but maybeAD::HEATHTribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way)Fri Jul 07 1995 11:254
    
    
    
      Thats why I was asking why you callled him a stiff.
63.1006ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 07 1995 11:3518
63.1007ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 07 1995 11:354
63.1008One giant leap for mankindMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Fri Jul 07 1995 11:5520
Billte, we subscribe to baseball on videotape, that's how we get a choice
of teams.

BUT for the last few weeks, NBC Super Channel has been showing a full length
game every Friday (actually Saturday in the wee smalls), on a half hour
tape delay.  So far, every game has been American League (damn), using the
feed of one of the teams:  twice the Red Sox, once the Orioles, twice the
Blue Jays, all of whom do a pretty good job.  Of course NBC SC doesn't sell
anywhere near as much commercial time as a US station, especially at three
AM, so they fill up the space between innings praising the rest of their
catastrophic offering.  The fast forward button gets even more of a
workout than next unseen.

I prefer NL ball for a number of reasons, of which only one is the DH.
I think umpiring is significantly better in the NL, for example, and by
and large so is managing (possibly a consequence of the DH).  And I can't
prove this, but I have a powerful impression that National League pitchers
on average work faster.

Steve
63.1009Minnesota makes outCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Fri Jul 07 1995 12:279
    
    >>    re: .1005
    
    >>    The trash is Trot Nixon pal.
    
    The Trash is Glenn Murry or Jose Malave. 
    
    
    
63.1010IMBETR::DUPREZFri Jul 07 1995 12:4223
If the "trash" is Trot Nixon, it hurts a lot less.  Trot's full name
has become Trot Oh My Achin' Back Nixon.

If it's Malave, that hurts.  But it's past July 4th, the Sox are in 1st -
you've got to live for today.

Enough about the Sox - this is the Indians note.

Ogea probably would have gotten an All-Star nod if he had been up in the
bigs and in the rotation all year to this point.  (I believe he spent some
time in the minors - correct me if I'm wrong.)

So far, I've been very impressed with Ogea and Tavarez, but I have yet to
see what the big deal is with Albie Lopez.

Groaner, if you're a true Indians fan, you should be shot for mentioning
Martinez and Black in the same sentence.  Bud can't hold Dennis' jock.
The only exception to the rule is if someone asks you to name the Indians'
rotation and Hargrove continues with the mental lapses that allow Black to
make starts for the Tribe.

Roland
63.1011ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 07 1995 13:2014
    
    While I'd agree that Black clearly isn't one of the Tribe's five
    best starters (I'd pick Nagy, Martinez, Ogea, Tavarez, and Clark
    among those who are healthy right now), it just doesn't matter much.
    Black's been OK every other time out, awful the other, and that's
    fine for now.  For Hershiser comes back, Black probably goes
    anyway (unless Clark relapses).
    
    Given the lead & the lineup, I don't mind the don't-worry-be-happy
    attitude.  I'd start thinking about bringing up Bell, though, to
    prepare him for the postseason (he seems the most likely candidate
    for an extra backup infielder).
    
    Joe
63.1012IMBETR::DUPREZFri Jul 07 1995 13:285
 >   Black's been OK every other time out, awful the other, and that's
 >   fine for now.  For Hershiser comes back, Black probably goes
 >   anyway (unless Clark relapses).

True enough.  It's hard to lose when you get 8 runs a game... :-)
63.1013ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 07 1995 13:4539
    
    Yes, but Black's wins _haven't_ been the result of run support
    (well, OK, certainly they have to some extent, but not in the
    usual sense).
    
    When Black hasn't had it, he's been _shelled_.  4+ runs in 3-
    innings shelled.  Hasn't even been close.
    
    When Black has had it, he's been OK; with the Indians offense,
    that's been plenty.
    
    Black's lines:
    
     Cleveland                IP     H   R  ER  BB  SO
A    Black (L, 0-1)            2.2   7   5   3   1   1
B    Black                     2     9   6   6   1   0
C    Black                     6     2   0   0   1   7
D    Black (W 1-1)             5     4   2   2   1   1
E    Black                     6     3   3   3   4   5
F    BLACK (W, 2-1)            5.2   7   4   3   1   7
G    Black (W, 3-1)            6     6   4   4   1   2
H    Black (L 3-2)             2.1   7   7   3   3   1
I    Black (W 4-2)             6     8   3   3   1   6
J    Black                     3.2   7   4   4   1   2
    
    In starts A, B, H, and J, Black's got the following total line:
    
    Cleveland                IP     H   R  ER  BB  SO
    Black (0-2)              10.2   30  22 16  6   4   ERA - 13.5
    
    In his other starts, Black's been much, much better:
    
    Cleveland                IP     H   R  ER  BB  SO
    Black (4-0)              34.2   30  16 15  9   28  ERA - 3.89
    
    The second line is adequate reason to leave him in the rotation
    for now, IMHO.
    
    Joe
63.1014ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 07 1995 13:488
    
    BTW, w.r.t. Black's run support:
    
    In his good games - 6.5 runs/game.
    
    In his bad games - 5.75 runs/game.
    
    Joe
63.1015Indians will need lefties for postseasonAKOCOA::BREENFri Jul 07 1995 14:1910
    Black = Left hander	- All those nice stats and double digit leads are
    nice but even granted Cleveland may be lucky enough to see the Redsox
    in the playoffs they still have to worry about the Yankees and still
    possibly the Blue Jays in the postseason (if Jays could just get rid of
    Gaston).
    
    They better have two lefthanders ready to go in those series and at
    least the option of a lefty for Boston.
    
    Of course Kansas City and Baltimore have ideas of their own.
63.1016have a clue!ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 07 1995 14:257
63.1017AKOCOA::BREENFri Jul 07 1995 14:261
    no I mean vs Yankees - what do you have from the portside, Paul?
63.1018ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 07 1995 14:2816
63.1019WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Fri Jul 07 1995 14:479
    
    
          The Yankees are the only team Paul and the other Indian fans
    should worry about.
    
        BECAUSE WE OWN THE TRIBE. Right Paul?
    
    
    Chap
63.1020ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 07 1995 14:536
    
    Actually, the Yankees no longer worry me.
    
    The Braves, however, do.
    
    Joe
63.1021It's a long time til OctoberMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Fri Jul 07 1995 15:0211
Given that the Indians have been having a bit of trouble with lefthanded
pitching, I'd worry about the Angels.

Funny things happen in the postseason because an apparently superior team
(which Cleveland surely is) runs into an opponent that can exploit an
Achilles' heel.  And in the postseason, a five-deep starting rotation
is not a necessity.

But of course, that assumes the Angels make it to the postseason.

Steve
63.1022ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 07 1995 16:2818
63.1023dudes a stiffAD::HEATHTribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way)Fri Jul 07 1995 17:078
    
    
    
     Paul....
    
       Why did you put Alomar in there?  He'll be hurt come 'off time.
    
    Jerry
63.1024ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 07 1995 17:144
63.1025Sure you're praying you'll face Boston,not NYAKOCOA::BREENFri Jul 07 1995 18:119
    Groaner,
    	So you are only worried about the Redsox?  Naturally I root for the
    old home town team but objectively the Yankees are the first big threat
    to the Indians and then the Blue Jays (end repetition).
    
    	So who does Cleveland have as serious left-handed stoppers?
    
    And is this a problem with reading comprehension or a problem that
    Indians lovers don't want to deal with.
63.1026ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 07 1995 18:5913
    
    Just to be certain we're clear on things...
    
>   So who does Cleveland have as serious left-handed stoppers?
    
    Are you asking who the Indians have to _hit_ lefthanders, or
    who the Indians have to _pitch_ _to_ lefthanders?
    
    I'll assume the latter; Martinez, Ogea, Poole, Assenmacher, Plunk,
    and Tavarez are all shutting lefties down; Hershiser might be, but
    I don't have his stats.
    
    Joe
63.1027Actually I think Bud Black is better than you thinkAKOCOA::BREENFri Jul 07 1995 20:5710
    No, I don't subscribe to that righty shutting lefty down, new age crap.
    I want to know who the lefties are on Cleveland's staff that they can
    use to shut down New York or even possibly Toronto.
    
    Now there was some team that went all the way with all right-handers to
    win world series etal but I can't think of it - perhaps Cleveland
    itself had Feller,Wynn,Lemon,Garcia all righties and beat Yanks in '54.
    
    But playing championship baseball without lefthanded starters is so
    rare that it actually is trivia question material.
63.1028ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 07 1995 21:587
63.1029ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsSun Jul 09 1995 00:5717
    Re .1027
    
    Righthanders shutting lefties down is new-age?
    
    I think your significantly overestimating platoon differential.
    It certainly does exist, for most players, but in general it's
    a relatively small effect.  Platoons are used, when they are,
    because either (a) you have two players for whom having the
    platoon advantage pushes them from "poor" to "acceptable", or
    (b) one or both of the players have extreme platoon differentials.
    
    The Braves scare me more than any other team because they have
    Maddux, Avery, and Smoltz.  I don't care if they're righty, lefty,
    ambidexrious, or throw with their feet - they can pitch, and good
    pitching _can_ turn a short series.
    
    JOe
63.1030ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSun Jul 09 1995 11:126
63.1031ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSun Jul 09 1995 11:135
63.1032ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSun Jul 09 1995 21:415
63.1033ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jul 10 1995 11:4469
63.1034SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Mon Jul 10 1995 12:227
    
    	Chad Ogea was sent to the minors. So that he would stay on his 5
    day rotation and pitch. With the All-Star break and resetting of the
    starting rotation. He would have had about a 10 day layoff. Chad will
    be brought back up later this week.
    
    Ron
63.1035IMBETR::DUPREZNever ruin good vodka with a dairy product...Mon Jul 10 1995 12:379
    
>    Gee, now I see why they sent down Ogea and kept Bud Black in the
>    rotation.  I'm sorry, with the Indians offense you still need a
>    guy that has decent stuff left.  Bud Black is done.  His > 6.00
>    ERA proves the point.

Well, Joe H., I'm not alone...

Roland
63.1036ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 10 1995 12:4114
    
    Was just about to point out the same thing - Ogea wasn't demoted, so
    much as kept busy.
    
    Of course, there's a reasonable argument that he should be pitching
    in the all-star game, but that's another matter.
    
    btw, anyone else read how Showalter really wanted Naehring for the
    all-star team?  Thome gets far too little respect from lots of people, 
    it seems - his numbers would be the very _best_ among outfielders,
    and he's playing a more difficult defensive position (well, maybe CF
    is more difficult).
    
    Joe
63.1037ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 10 1995 12:439
    
    I never said Black was _good_, just that he's more useful than his
    numbers would suggest.
    
    The rotation after the break will include Martinez, Ogea, Nagy,
    and Hershiser; the #5 spot will apparently be either Clark or
    Black.
    
    Joe
63.1038ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Jul 10 1995 12:4513
RE     <<< Note 63.1031 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same" >>>

>    How good can the NL hitters be when guys like Jamie Navarro go
>    for dirt in the AL to 7-2 in the NL.  Sure, there's no DH, but
>    I've got to believe that the hitting in the NL is significantly
>    lower in quality than in the AL.

  Well, that's a pretty small sample size. Castillo seems to be having a
winning year and Bullinger is 5-1 so it appears that at least for a while the
Cubs had something going. They've already dropped out of 1st and I suspect that
the league will figure out Navarro soon enough. 

  George
63.1039thome > Naehring ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jul 10 1995 13:059
63.1040ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jul 10 1995 13:114
63.1041What would we do with Sandy KoufaxAKOCOA::BREENMon Jul 10 1995 13:284
    Well, the answer to my question, couched in wierd requests for stats on
    one hand and more new-age baseball philosophy on the other hand is "No,
    serious lefties, we can do without them - Stengel and the rest were
    doing it with mirrors".
63.1042Lefties, righties, knuckleballers...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jul 10 1995 13:367
    If the Sox face Cleveland in the first round, I'd just pitch Tim
    Wakefield all 5 games if necessary.  The power is negated, and 
    guys like Vizquel become the best hitters...
    
    glenn
    
63.1043ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 10 1995 14:334
    
    You know, Glenn, I think you just might have something.
    
    Joe             
63.1044IMBETR::DUPREZNever ruin good vodka with a dairy product...Mon Jul 10 1995 14:547
Now that McGwire is out, I hear they might bring in Cecil Fielder to replace
him.  Now there's an *excellent* reason to be p.o.'ed about Thome not going.
AL All-Stars already have Thomas and Vaughn at 1B - might as well send the
most deserving cornerman.  I'm a Red Sox fan, but I'd send Thome over Naehring.
Of course I think they should both be going, and Wade should be watching the
game during a barbecue in Tampa or something...
63.1045ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 10 1995 15:167
    
    Cecil Fielder?
    
    I'd rather have Valentin at bat for my team than Fielder, and I bet
    Valentin would play a much better 1B to boot...
    
    Joe
63.1046ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jul 10 1995 15:364
63.1047ValentinIMBETR::DUPREZNever ruin good vodka with a dairy product...Mon Jul 10 1995 15:485
...he hit his 14th HR last night.

Joe's right - he probably *would* play a better 1B than Cecil.  So would
Thome.  I'm hoping the Cecil thing is just rumor...
63.1048SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Mon Jul 10 1995 17:5219
    
    	Saying what has Valentin done lately is like saying what has
    Cleveland done lately? Oh, they lost yesterday. Which must mean
    that the slide has started. They are going to choke an 11 game
    lead and not make the playoffs.
    
    
    	Both Thome and Valentin didn't make the All-Star team for the
    same reasons Mo Vaughn didn't in previous years. Start putting up
    the numbers year after year after year. Then you will go to the
    All-Star game. With every team needing to be represented. Unless
    the fans give you a lot of votes. It takes 3 quality years in a row
    to make the All-Star team.
    	The only way to reduce the 3 years. Is to eliminate the fan
    ballotting and let the players vote. Wade Boggs doesn't make it,
    except for the fans. Which took a spot away from Thome/Naehring.
    Stupid fan balloting is always taking spots aways from players.
    
    Ron
63.1049ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 10 1995 18:3622
    
    Ron,
    
    Nice theory, but...
    
    1) Valentin _has_ put up three straight good years - he's been the
       best offensive shortstop in the AL the past for a while now.
    
    2) Thome's been putting up all-star type numbers for a third baseman
       since the second half of 93 (he was in the minors in the first
       half).
    
    3) Ramirez made the all-star team this year, with less impressive
       performances previously than either of them _and_ no more
       impressive a performance this year, at a deeper offensive
       position, no less.
    
    4) Gary DiSarcina was named to the all-star team this year with
       no positive offensive background; unlike Valentin, his numbers
       appear completely out of whack with his career.
    
    Joe
63.1050USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jul 10 1995 18:575
>    1) Valentin _has_ put up three straight good years - he's been the
>       best offensive shortstop in the AL the past for a while now.

JoeH, can you post these "good" numbers that Valentin has put up
for 3 straight years ?  Ditto Thome....
63.1051ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Jul 10 1995 18:5912
  You guys keep forgetting, this is not a best-player game, it's an all-star
game. Some times the best players are also stars but other times they are not.
The idea is to get popular big name players together so both fans and semi-fans
will tune in to watch the comercials. 

  They know that the real fans who are up on who's having a hot 1st half and
who is not will tune in so why go out of the way to try to attract those guys?
They want to make sure the big name players from years past get selected so the
semi-fans who just got done watching hockey and basketball will tune in to
watch the game and to develope some interest for baseball's 2nd half.

  George
63.1052IMBETR::DUPREZNever ruin good vodka with a dairy product...Mon Jul 10 1995 19:134
>  You guys keep forgetting, this is not a best-player game, it's an all-star
>game.

I don't think it's forgetting as much as lamenting...
63.1053tribe wins again... what else is newROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jul 10 1995 19:145
63.1054ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 10 1995 19:1725
    
    No, George, we aren't (or at least I'm not - I suppose I shouldn't
    speak for others).  While the idea of MLB might be as you say, what
    _I_ want the game to be is a display of baseball's best players of
    the moment (based, perhaps, 2/3 upon the first half of the current
    season, 1/3 upon second half of the previous season).
    
    w.r.t. Valentin & Thome:
    
    Sure thing:
    
    1993
    
    Thome - .385 OBP, .474 SLG (154 AB)
    Valentin - .346 OBP, .447 SLG
    
    No regular SS (arbitrary minimum of 90 games at SS) had a higher
    OBP or SLG than Valentin.
    
    1994
    
    Thome - .354 OBP, .516 SLG
    Valentin - .405 OBP, .514 SLG
    
    Joe
63.1055How about Murray then at 1bAKOCOA::BREENMon Jul 10 1995 20:0411
    
    I lean more to George's view - let the up and comers establish
    themselves for a year or two unless the player is a Fred Lynn.
    One Cleveland player who would qualify and be a great substitute for
    McGuire would be Murray.
    
    The other thing is the one player from each team goal vs trying to win
    the game - Showalter has a clear idea in his mind of the type of player
    he wants out there and from reading Gammons, DiScarcina is that type.
    
    Now in Fenway, Naehring and Valentin are definitely the types.
63.1056ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 10 1995 20:085
    
    Murray's injured, so it doesn't matter anyway, but he'd be an
    even worse choice than Cecil.
    
    Joe
63.1057ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 14 1995 12:1537
63.1058ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 14 1995 12:3810
63.1059IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Jul 14 1995 12:445
Where is Jaret Wright pitching?  I've heard of the other two, but not him.

Having seen Albie Lopez, I think I could part with him for the right deal.
I have no idea about Wright and Colon.
63.1060ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 14 1995 12:543
63.1061CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Fri Jul 14 1995 14:219
    Wright I believe was the Indians #1 pick in the amatuer draft last
    year. His father I believe used to pitch for tha Angels. Indians gave
    him some big bucks to sign. I don't think the Indians need another
    pitcher. Why trade 3 of their pitching prospects when they have
    Martinez and Hersheiser getting up in years. While both of them are
    very good pitchers when Wright and Colon are ready both of these should
    be done.
    
    Mike
63.1062IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Jul 14 1995 14:356
>    Wright I believe was the Indians #1 pick in the amatuer draft last
>    year. His father I believe used to pitch for tha Angels.

I remember him.  Clyde Wright.  I used to have his baseball card.

I hope the son is a better pitcher... :-)
63.1063Feel free not to accept conventional wisdomMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Fri Jul 14 1995 15:1611
The conventional wisdom in baseball says:

	If you have a chance to win it all now, and you have a chance
	to get one player who can put you over the top by sacrificing
	the future, do it.  That future may never come, so if you can
	see the brass ring, grab for it.

No doubt David Cone would make the Indians (even) stronger.  My question
is:  aren't they already strong enough?

Steve
63.1064WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Fri Jul 14 1995 15:4911
    
    
         No the Indians are not strong enough. The best thing they could do
    is get Cone so noone else can pick him up. The Yankees have beaten the
    Snot out of Cleveland for the past 1.5 - 2 years. They are the only AL
    Team that Cleveland Dreads seeing come playoff time. Thats why Groaner
    hates the Sox cuz he know Cleveland will roll over Boston but get
    rolled by NY!!!
    
    
    Chap
63.1065ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 14 1995 16:5433
    
    Chappy,
    
>    No the Indians are not strong enough. The best thing they could do
>    is get Cone so noone else can pick him up.
    
    The best thing if you don't want to see a dynasty in Cleveland, of
    course.
    
>    The Yankees have beaten the
>    Snot out of Cleveland for the past 1.5 - 2 years.
    
    Chappy, since when did 16 games become a significant sample size?
    Yes, NY swept Cleveland last year.  NY was a much better team
    last year, and Cleveland was somewhat weaker.  This year, Cleveland
    has won 2 of 4 and NY has won 2 of 4.
    
>    They are the only AL Team that Cleveland Dreads seeing come playoff 
>    time.
    
    Oh, yeah, the Braves don't scare me at all.
    
    Tell you what, Chappy - I'll bet you a months worth of Personal
    Names that, should by some miracle the Yankees actually make the
    playoffs, and should the Yankees & Indians meet in the playoffs,
    the Indians will win.
    
    If the teams don't meet in the playoffs, no one loses.
    
    Heck, if you want, I'll _also_ bet a weeks worth of PNames on
    the season series record between the teams.
    
    Joe
63.1066ERICF::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 14 1995 17:1615
  One reason to get Cone is that while it takes a lot of good pitchers to get
to the playoffs, it takes a few great pitchers to win them. This is due to the
extra days of rest for travel and due to the fact that there are no weak teams
that allow those 4.500 - 6.00 type pitchers to pick up a few wins.

  If you look at the Indians pitching staff everyone is pretty good but after
Martinez with his 2.36 ERA and Nagy with his 3.62 ERA the starters get a little
thin. Good but not great, especially if they end up playing against Maddux,
Smoltz, Glavine, Avery in the World Series. 

  Throwing Cone in there would give them a championship playoff rotation of
Martinez, Cone, Nagy, whoever which could compete with anyone over a short
series.

  George
63.1067history repeatsOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jul 14 1995 17:215
63.1068ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 14 1995 17:2312
    
> If you look at the Indians pitching staff everyone is pretty good but after
> Martinez with his 2.36 ERA and Nagy with his 3.62 ERA the starters get a 
> little thin.
    
    Well, there is always Ogea with his 2.19 ERA...
    
    I'd like to have Cone.  I would trade Embree to get Cone.  I
    might consider trading Wright to get Cone.  I would not trade
    Colon to get Cone, and probably not Ogea...
    
    Joe
63.1070mike still sore because one of his many favs choked!ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 14 1995 17:257
63.1071ERICF::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 14 1995 17:2610
RE          <<< Note 63.1067 by OUTSRC::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>

>    What year was it that the Clevescum Indians were the "best team in
>    baseball" and were swept in the Word Series?  '54?
    
  Yes, in '54 they were swept in 4 by the Giants. That was Willie Mays' rookie
year. In '48 they beat the Braves in 6 after beating the Red Sox in a playoff
spoiling the all Boston World Series. 

  George
63.1072ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 14 1995 17:2915
63.1073Las Vegas thinks the Tribe can win now...SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Fri Jul 14 1995 17:3921
    
    	Well it looks like Las Vegas thinks the Tribe. Can win without
    adding anybody to the roster.
    
    			Odds on winning pennant	   Odds on winning W.S.
    
    Indians                    Even                      2-1
    Braves                     2-1                       4-1
    Reds                       5-2                       5-2
    Red Sox                    4-1                       7-1
    Rockies                    5-1                      12-1
    Phillies                   6-1                      12-1
    Orioles                    7-1                      15-1
    Astros                     7-1                      15-1
    Angels                     8-1                      15-1
    Rangers                    8-1                      15-1
    Yankees                    8-1                      15-1
    
    
    
    Ron
63.1074IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Jul 14 1995 18:364
Orioles 7-1 and Tigers not mentioned?

Oops, I forgot.  This is the line - it's meant to drum up interest...
63.1075ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 14 1995 19:328
    
    Why would the Tigers be mentioned?
    
    The only one that really stands out to me in Colorado; the Rockies
    offense is pretty bad, and the pitching doesn't seem quite good
    enough to make up for the (though it is pretty good)...
    
    Joe
63.1076leading the divison by 5 gamesOLD1S::CADZILLA2Cooties, no cooties on me!!Fri Jul 14 1995 19:525
    
    Yea their offense is terrible. Three in top 5 for homers. More than
    half the starting 9 hitting over 300. The best pinch hitter in MLB
    17-36, that some terrible offense all right.
    
63.1077IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Jul 14 1995 19:5312
>    Why would the Tigers be mentioned?
 
They're ahead of the Orioles in the standings (2nd place vs. 3rd).

>    The only one that really stands out to me in Colorado; the Rockies
>    offense is pretty bad, and the pitching doesn't seem quite good
>    enough to make up for the (though it is pretty good)...

Are you sure you didn't reverse the words "offense" and "pitching" in
this paragraph?  Galarraga, Bichette, Walker, Hayes, and Castilla is a
decent start to an offense.
 
63.1078CADZILLA COLLISION!IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Jul 14 1995 19:540
63.10791954 was a year of justiceOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jul 14 1995 20:082
63.1080no more CharlieLOCK::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Fri Jul 14 1995 20:224
    
    	Hayes went to Philly.....
    
    Claybone
63.1081ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 14 1995 20:3161
    
>>    Why would the Tigers be mentioned?
 
>They're ahead of the Orioles in the standings (2nd place vs. 3rd).

>>    The only one that really stands out to me in Colorado; the Rockies
>>    offense is pretty bad, and the pitching doesn't seem quite good
>>    enough to make up for the (though it is pretty good)...

>Are you sure you didn't reverse the words "offense" and "pitching" in
>this paragraph?  Galarraga, Bichette, Walker, Hayes, and Castilla is a
>decent start to an offense.
    
    No, I didn't.
    
    Colorado's record, to this point, can be best attributed to their
    strong pitching.
    
    Their offense is among the _worst_ in the NL.
    
    You see, Colorado does things to offense not seen in years - it has
    a _huge_ effect upon offense, a far larger positive effect than
    the Astrodome's negative effect.
    
    At home, Colorado scores ~7 runs a game, and gives up ~6.
    
    On the road, Colorado scores ~3 runs a game, and gives up ~4.
    
    3 runs a game is _pathetic_.
    
    Home vs. Road stats for the Rockies:
    
    Walker: Home - .419 OBP, .776 SLG
            Away - .350 OBP, .472 SLG
    
    Gallaraga: Home - .378 OBP, .586 SLG
               Away - .323 OBP, .521 SLG
    
    Bichette: Home - .410 OBP, .732 SLG
              Away - .318 OBP, .366 SLG
    
    Unfortunately, I don't have OBP & SLG split home and road for the
    others, but even just batting average:
    
    Bates - .344 home, .194 road
    Castilla - .371 home, .264 road
    Weiss - .277 home, .223 road
    Kingery - .243 home, .317 road (yes, he's backwards)
    Girardi - .324 home, .245 road
    
    Meanwhile, a pitching staff that gives up 4 runs a game in a neutral
    park is pretty good; a staff that gives up 6 runs a game in Colorado
    is also pretty good.
    
    An offense that scores 3 runs/game on the road, and 7 a game in Denver
    is, on the whole, below average - 7 runs a game in Denver is an
    average figure, 3 runs/game on the road well below average, so what
    else, on the whole, can a combination of the two be besides below
    average?
    
    Joe
63.1082ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSat Jul 15 1995 12:0313
63.10831-0 must a been a great game to watch. AD::HEATHTribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way)Sat Jul 15 1995 12:439
    
    
     Lopez pitched 2/3 of an inning in the second game.  I wouldn't make
    any assumptions yet.
    
    Jerry
    
    but I could have read the line wrong this morning it twas early
    
63.1084I mean bottleRocketROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSat Jul 15 1995 14:034
63.1085startin to think rog is cookedAD::HEATHTribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way)Sat Jul 15 1995 14:303
    
    
    nope a little better than that.
63.1086.700 is okay, but not greatROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSun Jul 16 1995 22:297
63.1087.750 maybe not .800AD::HEATHTribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way)Mon Jul 17 1995 11:097
    
    
      Paul if the Tribe crashes and burns (I personally don't think it will
    happen but one can hope) you are going to be taking monumental portions
    of crow.
    
    Jerry
63.1088ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jul 17 1995 11:428
63.1089Lefty - lefty not working these daysAKOCOA::BREENMon Jul 17 1995 13:2215
    I have to second guess myself and wonder if Joe Huber is right about
    the current effectiveness of lefthanded pitching, especially against
    lefthanded batters.  KK had despaired of ever seeing Lilliquist do the
    job, ESPN nightly shows lefties shelled by lefties.
    
    Part of the problem may be lefties developing pitches specifically for
    righthanded batters and possibly just assuming their normal stuff will
    get out righties.  Also lefthanded batters may be more determined to
    hit lefties in order to stay in the lineup at the salaries a full time
    player earns.
    
    I don't know the answer but Hargrove can't be faulted for staying with
    the best pitchers regardeless of the side their slinging from.
    
    billte
63.1090Been studied many timesMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Mon Jul 17 1995 14:537
Bill, I'll bet that, when the season is over and the sabermetric books
hit the stands, you'll see that the platoon still holds up overall.
Every year there are a few anomalies, but most of them revert to pattern
the following season.  Historically, there are very, very few exceptions
to the old "right vs. left" saw.

Steve
63.1091It's a righthanded thinking world todayAKOCOA::BREENMon Jul 17 1995 18:1719
    Well here would be some thoughts as to how the basic assumptions around
    right vs left could be affected:
    
    	1.  Fewer if any out and out beanballs.  Even the message pitches
    		are thrown over the head.  Both lefties and righties are 
    		staying in more and more (except when Randy Johnson is
    		pitching.
    
    	2.  Umpiring.  Not sure why but I believe the national league
    		method of looking over the should instead of straight down
    		is in use in both leagues.
    
    	3.  Types of pitches.  Lefties used to use the big sweeping curve
    		to great advantage.  Most lefties today seem to use some
    		kind of screwball to be effective with righties.
    
    Different managers, catchers, different mindset.
    
    
63.1092Just a touch of humor by S.I.FABSIX::E_MAXWELLOh flight attendent!Tue Jul 18 1995 08:014
      Sports Illusrated July 10, 1995. Hideo Nomo is on the cover.
    Open to pages 24-25, Notice scoreboard in background.
    
                                                     Lil Ed
63.1093ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jul 19 1995 11:218
63.1094IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Wed Jul 19 1995 12:486
>    Soon Cleveland will have to spot teams 10 runs to make it close.

Then the Angels would have beat them 17 or 18 to 3 the night before last...

It's all still foolishness at this point, but what does Cleveland's record
project to over the "full" schedule?
63.1095ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jul 19 1995 12:5011
    
    Well, they've got a .699 winning percentage as of this morning,
    so...
    
    In 144 games, they'd win 101.
    
    In 154 games, they'd win 108.
    
    In 162 games, they'd win 113.
    
    Joe
63.1096IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Wed Jul 19 1995 13:013
>    In 144 games, they'd win 101.

Winning over 100 games in a shorter schedule *would* be pretty impressive.
63.1097SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERWed Jul 19 1995 17:3221
    
    
    
    		C L E V E L A N D   I N D I A N S   
    
    
    	Once again.......bottom of the ninth......ITS OUT OF HERE!
    
    		THE CLEVELAND INDIANS WIN THE GAME!!!
    		THE CLEVELAND INDIANS WIN THE GAME!!!
    
    
    	I watched "Major League" again yesterday....the boy just
    	can't get enough.
    
    	Does anyone not cry at the end of the game???
    
    
    		The Chief,
    			WAHOOOOOOOO!
    
63.1098RE: .1097IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Wed Jul 19 1995 17:567

Congratulations, Groaner.  You now look like a model of impartiality and
restraint.

Question of the Day:  Does Hal know that Charlie Sheen is not in the Indians
		      rotation?
63.1099CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westWed Jul 19 1995 19:308
    
    >Question of the Day:  Does Hal know that Charlie Sheen is not in the
                           Indians rotation?
    
    Of course he does, he's in the bullpen 8^)
    
    Marc
    
63.1100Hal's Back SnarfSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOThu Jul 20 1995 12:473
I guess the summer just wouldn't have been complete without the man.

zamboni
63.1101now back to the regularly scheduled junkROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 20 1995 13:066
63.1102Donks == BurrosSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOThu Jul 20 1995 18:4716
>    donks sip.

You think they'll be that good this year iceMan?

I haven't seen anything to make me jump up and down about them this season.
All we can pray for is Johnny Boy has a mirculous year as a drop back passer.

FWIW.  Paul has been a red, white and blue Indians fan forever.  Browns too, but
Brown and Orange there.  Definitely no bandwagoning on his part for those two
teams.

Personally I'm looking forward to 8/1 when my personal baseball strike ends and
I can check out what's what with these Indians.  Ain't jumping on their wagon, 
just want to size them up for the Sox/Indiams playoff clash!

zamboni
63.110314-3 VICTORY OVER TEXAS ON THE ROAD...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERThu Jul 20 1995 19:2326
    
    
    			W A H O O O O O O O O O
    
    	The Tribe does it again....but last night was a "team" thing...
    
    	Love watching ESPN in the morning.  #1 batter for the Indians
    	2 hits, 2 runs, 2 RBI'S, #2 batter for the Indians: 3 hits, 2
    RBI's, etc, etc.....#6 batter for the Indians: 1 HR, 3 hits, 4 RBI's,
    #7 batter for the Indians: 4 hits, 5 RBI's, and the list went on...and
    on....  God I wish I lived in or near Cleveland for the rest of this
    season just to experience what is happening to the team/city right now.
    I wana go home!  
    
    	Talked to dear ole Mom the other day and thanked her for the flag.
    and, wouldn't you know it, it looks F___ing good in my front yard!
    I have been taking it everywhere...the beach...camping...everywhere!
    I even tied it to my Jeep when I go to parties.  I love it!  Cleveland
    Indians!!!
    
    	Later...
    
    		The Chief,
    			   WAHOOOOOOOO!
    
    
63.1104IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Thu Jul 20 1995 19:5015
>    I wana go home!  

If you ask nicely, we might take up a collection, as long as there are no
places to log in from there...

>   	Talked to dear ole Mom the other day and thanked her for the flag.
>    and, wouldn't you know it, it looks F___ing good in my front yard!

Is this the same flag you were complaining about as too big?  Shame on you,
you should have known that Mom knows best...

Hal, people would treat you with more respect if you at least named the #2, #6,
and #7 hitters for the Indians before crowing about them.

Are they Vizquel (#2), Ramirez (#6), and Thome (#7)?
63.1105ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 20 1995 20:102
63.1106only boston loses to texasROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 20 1995 20:103
63.1107ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 20 1995 20:393
63.1108ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 20 1995 20:393
63.1109another one bites the dust...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERThu Jul 20 1995 21:186
    
    	So, did they win......again?
    
    	the Chief,
    			WaHooooooooo!
    
63.1110To Oakland for a couple....SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERFri Jul 21 1995 11:3813
    
    	What a stupid question Aeeeeeee.......
    
    	The Tribe takes Texas in over 100 degree temps 6-3.
    
    	Batter #9     Sandy Alomar hist 2 home runs and is todays
    	
    			player of the game.....
    
    	Batter #2     Omar Visquell (SP) was runner up.
    
    The Chief
    			Wahoooooooo!
63.1111PSDVAX::ROBICHAUDDon'tTakeComedyFromStrangersFri Jul 21 1995 11:584
    	Man this Indians team looks unstoppable.  Should be an easy romp to
    a world title.
    
    				   /Don
63.1112CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianFri Jul 21 1995 12:166
>    	Man this Indians team looks unstoppable.  Should be an easy romp to
>    a world title.
    


Anything less would be a major choke job.
63.1113ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 21 1995 13:115
63.1114ODIXIE::ZOGRANReasonable summer ratesFri Jul 21 1995 13:134
    re .1113 - So I guess I'll have more than just one p-name bet on the WS
    when the Sox meet the Braves?
    
    UMDan
63.1115post-season blunders await...USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jul 21 1995 13:5811
>    Sox favored to win the WS, if the Indians beat Boston it would be a
>    miracle.

Red Sox or Indians are destined to be the answer to a trivia question:

	"Which division winner was the first to lose to a wildcard team ?"


Hopefully it will be Boston.  Cleveland will go further down the Hall of
Futility when "the greatest hitting lineup of all-time" doesn't win the
AL pennant and get to the WS.
63.1116CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Fri Jul 21 1995 14:5836
       Who knows what team Paul will be picking for the WS in 2 Weeks?
    Could he be losing faith in his team?
    
    
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.1053                    CLEVELAND INDIANS                   1053 of 1115
ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same"        5 lines  10-JUL-1995 15:14
                   -< tribe wins again... what else is new >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    What else is there to talk about in the Indians note, the question is
    who will cleveland beat in round 1, in the ALCS and in the WS.  Other
    than that, the rest is boring.
    
    
    
    
    
    ==========================================================================
    Note 63.1113                    CLEVELAND INDIANS                  1113 of 1115
    ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same"        5 lines 21-JUL-1995 09:11
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Sox favored to win the WS, if the Indians beat Boston it would be a
        miracle.  Clemens - future hall of famer, Hanson, Wakefield, Aggie,
        Canseco, Greenwell - these guys are all -world.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
63.1117How's your 'robe' fit?MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Fri Jul 21 1995 15:4913
	Hal,

	I'm suprized that a "die-hard" Cleveland fan like yourself
	wouldn't have been flying that Indians flag even through
	the lean years.

	It's not at all like you, or your clone, Groaner, to woop
	it up only when the CLeveland team of the moment does well.
	many ;^)



	billl
63.1118May well decide who I'm rooting for in OctoberMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Fri Jul 21 1995 16:3114
I can't figure out which will be more obnoxious:

	Hal and Paul if the Indians win everything

			or

	The rest of you feeding them crow if they don't.

But then there's Joe H, living and dying with his Indians and actually
knowing what he's talking about.

Hmmmm.  It's going to be a tough call.

Steve
63.1119ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 21 1995 16:563
63.1120CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianFri Jul 21 1995 17:2916
>    
>    Trust me, this conference will get closed down if the Indians win.
>    I'm already working on the batch noting procedure.
>

I beg your pardon.


I didn't close it down when the Rockets won the NBA championship, nor when the
Devils won the Stanley Cup.

I'm not planning on shutting it down should the Indians win the series....


'Saw

63.1121:^oUSCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jul 21 1995 17:334
>    Trust me, this conference will get closed down if the Indians win.
>    I'm already working on the batch noting procedure.

Another Digital "application" that will never get used.
63.1122OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jul 21 1995 20:382
63.11232 MORE DINGERSSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERSat Jul 22 1995 14:1642
    
    	The Tribe does it again.......6-1 over Oakland. 
    
    	Martinezz gets the win for his 9th.  Now 9 and 0 for the season
    he remains in the running for the cy-young award.
    
    	Player of the game...tough one here today but have to give it
    to Albert Belle who smacked another HR and went 2 for 4 on the day.
    
    	2nd place player of the game is Manny who also hit another HR
    which ups his home run total to 22.  Also, 2nd place play of the game
    is Tomme who when 2 for 4 and had 3 RBI's for the day.
    
    	The team has gone 8 for 9 since the all star break and is now again
    the hottest team in the major leagues!
    
    	There is no stopping this team.  The city goes crazy!  No
    murchandise to be had ... anywhere!
    
    
    	Tickets wanted......any Cleveland Indian home game...
    
    	Reports from Cleveland is that there are only 40,000 tickets
    remaining for the rest of the season.  Thats right...only 40,000
    tickets for the remaining home games.  Scalping is at an all time
    high.  People are paying outragous prices for Cleveland home tickets.
    
    	The only ballpark to sellout every game!  There is no comparison!
    
    	The bandwaggon is full but here comes the bus.  Don't worry, we'll
    make room in this notes file.  Has to be a record...what note is this??
    2000....COME ONE, COME ALL....
    
    
    		W E L C O M E   T O   T H E   S H O W 
    
    
    
    	WAAAHOOOOOOO!!
    
    		THE CHIEF
    
63.1124ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSat Jul 22 1995 14:234
63.1125cleveland has won 13 straight v.s. oaklandROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSun Jul 23 1995 00:295
63.1126ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSun Jul 23 1995 13:5610
63.1127ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 24 1995 11:515
    
    Agreed.  I might see trading Perry & Jackson for a pitcher, but not
    for Ken Hill, and certainly not those two _and_ Bell...
    
    Joe
63.1128SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Mon Jul 24 1995 15:3828
    
    	If I can remember what I read in the Globe yesterday. Here
    is how the playoffs will work in baseball this year.
    	The easy part is that the 3 division winners make the players. With
    the wild-card team being the team with the best record. As of today it
    would be California, Cleveland, Boston, and Texas.
    	The wild-card team can not face a division opponent in the 1st
    round. A wild-card team can not have home field advantage in the 1st
    round, even if they have a better record then a division winner. In
    a 5 games series (1st round), The East and West division's will have
    home field advantage.
    	Which currently leaves us with the following. Texas can not face
    California in the 1st round (same division). Texas can not face Cleveland
    in the 1st round (Wild card can't be home team, Cleveland is not in the
    East or  West, so they can't be home team.)
    	Since Texas can't face California or Cleveland, they would face
    the Red Sox in the 1st round. Cleveland would face California, with
    California being the home team.
    	The home teams play the first 2 games on the road, with games 3,
    4, and 5 at home. So if the playoffs started today. Cleveland would
    face California, with games 1 and 2 in Cleveland. With games 3, 4, and
    5 in California if necessary. Boston would face Texas, with games 1
    and 2 in Texas. With gams 3, 4, and 5 in Boston if necessary.
    	So there is a real possibility that Cleveland. Could finish the
    regular season with the best record in baseball. Yet, still not have
    home field advantage during the 1st round of the playoffs.
    
    Ron
63.1129IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Mon Jul 24 1995 15:5816
>    In
>    a 5 games series (1st round), The East and West division's will have
>    home field advantage.

This, to me, is positively bizarre.  Why are these arbitrarily defined?

The most reasonable thing, to me, is:

	o  wild card can't have home field
	o  wild card has to play division winner with best record
	o  division winner with 2nd best record (of division winners) has
	     HFA against remaining division winner

and that's it.  None of this "so-and-so division winner gets HFA in 199x..."

Roland
63.1130ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Jul 24 1995 17:037
  Baseball has never given home field advantage to the team with the better
record. In the past they have always alternated between the two divisions.

  That's not to say it's right or wrong but that probably factored into the
current system that makes it depend on the division instead of the record.

  George
63.1131ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameMon Jul 24 1995 17:0834
63.1132SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Mon Jul 24 1995 17:4813
    
    .1131,
    
    	>>> This statement is wrong "So there is a real possibility that
        >>> Cleveland. Could finish the regular season with the best
        >>> record in baseball. Yet, still not have home field advantage
        >>> during the 1st round of the playoffs."
    
    	How can that statement be wrong? The rest of your note prooves
    that the statement is correct.  Did you miss the "still NOT have"
    part of my note?
    
    Ron
63.1133USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jul 24 1995 19:389
    	>>> This statement is wrong "So there is a real possibility that
        >>> Cleveland. Could finish the regular season with the best
        >>> record in baseball. Yet, still not have home field advantage
        >>> during the 1st round of the playoffs."
    
>    	How can that statement be wrong? The rest of your note prooves

Ron, your statement uses "possibility".  It is not a possibility.
It WILL happen.
63.1134ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 24 1995 19:419
    
    I think the "possible" in Ron's "possibility" refers to the Indians
    having the best record in baseball, not the Indians playing on the
    road in the playoffs.
    
    The Indians haven't clinched the best record in baseball quite yet...
    B^)
    
    Joe 
63.1135CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Mon Jul 24 1995 19:463
    I disagree. It's possible that Cleveland might not have the best record
    come playoff time. (possible not probable)So Ron's statement is correct!
                                                  
63.1136But they won't win the pennant anyway !!!USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jul 24 1995 19:492
didn't see the "best record" part...or maybe even I have accepted it as
a foregone conclusion.
63.1137ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameTue Jul 25 1995 14:575
63.1138IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Jul 25 1995 15:446
>    Gregg Olson sold to Omaha (KC - AA affiliate).

I saw this.  What do you Tribe fans think of this?  I don't think he's any
great shakes anymore, but at least he was some form of insurance if something
happened to Mesa.  Have the Indians publicized what their backup plan would
be if Mesa gets hurt?
63.1139ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 25 1995 17:549
    
    Personally, it's no big deal.  There just wasn't room for Olson
    on the major league roster given Mesa's success.
    
    The Indians haven't publicized a backup plan, but Plunk or Tavarez
    would seem the most likely candidates; Shuey might get consideration,
    too, I suppose.
    
    Joe
63.1140asking the top baseball mind I knowAKOCOA::BREENTue Jul 25 1995 18:043
    It would seem that if they need Olsen they just retrieve him from the
    minors.  To have sent him down he has to be available to any other
    club, right Groaner?
63.1141IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Jul 25 1995 18:376
No, Bill, he's with Omaha now - the *Royals* farm club.  He's not Indians'
property anymore...

What surprised me was that I saw "sold" somewhere in the transaction.  Why
not at least get a body (a middling prospect?) for him?
63.1142ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameTue Jul 25 1995 21:4313
63.1143ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jul 26 1995 11:154
63.1144just for reference billl... you'll be visiting note 50 soonROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jul 26 1995 12:0214
63.1145ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jul 26 1995 12:035
63.1146ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jul 26 1995 12:366
    
    Now aren't _those_ statistically significant statistics...
    
    How about SLG & OBP numbers?
    
    Joe
63.1147IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Wed Jul 26 1995 13:2113
>    Over the past 5 weeks:
>    
>    Omar Vizquel hitting  .277
>    John Valentin hitting .209

Groaner, do you have any other amusing "random time slices"?  For all the
things you say about Heiser, you'd do him proud...

When it's all over and done, we can list all of the numbers, offensive and
defensive, and compare.

I still have no idea *what* you have against John Valentin.  Did he rob you
of a base hit in grade school or something?
63.1148MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Jul 26 1995 13:225
One thing's fer sure, Groaner, one of us will be dining on some crow
in October.


billl
63.1149Go Yanks? Did I say that?AKOCOA::BREENWed Jul 26 1995 15:5413
    Well those Indians certainly are an exciting team with those comebacks.
    They couldn't get by ol' Lee Smith last night - this guy ironically is
    looking like a surer bet for the hof than his old teammate Clemens.
    
    Watch out for the Yankees they are becoming one driven team thanks to
    the ultimate idiot George S. who's forced his team to circle the
    wagons.  The things Steinbrainless says "Buck needs to tell the press
    what he tells the team in closed meetings" - if George wanted to hire
    an idiot to manage his team he should have searched the Boston
    organization.
    
    But Donny is hot, the Yanks are driven - Chappy forward me a yankee
    bandwagon application will ya.
63.1150Going, going, GONE!SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOWed Jul 26 1995 16:359
>I still have no idea *what* you have against John Valentin.  Did he rob you
>of a base hit in grade school or something?

Nah,

	More likely Valentin hit an IceMan offering DEEP and OUTTA the ball 
yard to win the game in grade school.

	zamboni
63.1151OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Jul 26 1995 16:491
63.1152ONOFRE::MAY_BRMich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &amp;1beerWed Jul 26 1995 16:5415
    >KFSA::LONG ""just keep it between the lines""        8 lines 14-JAN-1993
    >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------       
    >re: winning it all in two years...   
    
    >     Hal,        
    
    >Just for future reference, and I think you'll need it, 
    >the Crow Cafe is now note 50.
    
    
    Lemme help you with the math here, Groaner.  It's more than two years,
    and Hal ought trot over to #50.  Where do you get the time to go back
    two+ years and dig these things up anyway?
    
    brews
63.1153ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jul 26 1995 17:2210
63.1154ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Jul 26 1995 17:2512
63.1155ONOFRE::MAY_BRMich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &amp;1beerWed Jul 26 1995 17:365
    
    Sorry Groaner, I only read what was posted.  I don't have time to go
    back through notes that are over 2 1/2 years old.
    
    brews 
63.1156OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Jul 26 1995 23:243
63.1157ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 27 1995 00:4213
63.1158ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 27 1995 13:3123
63.1159Let the sandbaggin' begin!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Thu Jul 27 1995 14:056
	Looks to me like the Tribe is a LOCK for a WS appearance!




	billl
63.1160USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jul 27 1995 15:0914
>    Cleveland's record this year v.s. other playoff potentials
    
                       TOTAL   HOME    ROAD     Remaining
>    New York            2-2     0-0     2-2     3H,4R

>    Nice scheduling 11 games v.s. NYY - 8 in NY.


Groaner, you shock me.  The Cle is 1-0 at Yankee Stadium and 1-2 in Cle.
And they have 8 remaining, 5 in NY !


BTW, no way Calif gets to the ALCS.  Lee Smith will cough-up a couple
of playoff games.  And kids don't usually hit when they get to post-season.
63.1161ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 27 1995 17:428
63.1162ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Jul 27 1995 17:436
63.1163USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jul 27 1995 18:374
>    but, according to ESPN
>    web page, they have 7 games remaining.

They don't have the re-scheduled rain-out of 5/17 in their schedule.
63.1164ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 28 1995 00:5514
63.1165ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 28 1995 02:4112
63.1166PUSH::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 28 1995 12:222
    
    Tribe blows 5-0 lead and loses 11-5.
63.1167IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Jul 28 1995 12:5412
>    The Angels also made a deal sending 4 minor leaguers including
>    Andrew Lorraine to Chicago for Rick Fortugno and Jim Abbott.

This trade will haunt them down the line.  Abbott has been pretty mediocre
the last couple of years (although I confess I don't know how he's doing this
year).  Fortugno was a career minor leaguer who finally made it to the bigs
in his early 30's.  Andrew Lorraine is going to be a really good pitcher.

(Yes, Paul, you can point to this two years from now and point me in the
direction of the Crow Cafe...)

Roland
63.1168OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jul 28 1995 19:191
63.1169ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameFri Jul 28 1995 20:363
63.11703 is enoughSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERFri Jul 28 1995 20:578
    
    	I hate it when the Tribe loses!!!
    
    
    	The Chief.....
    
    	WaBooooooobooooooooboooooooo
    
63.1171OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jul 28 1995 21:172
63.1172SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Fri Jul 28 1995 22:539
    
    	David Cone has been traded to?
    
    
    
    	The New York Yankees for 3 minor league pitchers.
    
    
    Ron
63.1173ABTS-BTC!ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameSat Jul 29 1995 00:032
63.1174ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 31 1995 13:3610
    
    My thoughts on the Hill deal...
    
    It could have been worse.
    
    If Hill regains his form, it's an OK deal.
    
    If he continues to pitch like he has this year, though...
    
    Joe
63.1175Might not have been his problemMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Mon Jul 31 1995 15:036
I suspect Hill's numbers were inflated by the Cardinals' uncharacteristically
terrible defense.

We'll find out soon enough.

Steve
63.1176ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 31 1995 15:159
    
    Hmmm...
    
    Error-prone defense will lower ERAs; only low-range defense really 
    raises ERAs (though that might be what the Cards have).
    
    Of course, playing in Busch _will_ lower ERAs, too...
    
    Joe
63.1177Watch Joey Belle corkscrew himself into the ground...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Aug 07 1995 17:299
    
    Anyone going down to Fenway tomorrow night to see The Amazing Tim 
    Wakefield go against that much-feared Tribe lineup?  I don't have
    tix but I think this is a matchup that I just can't miss.  An early
    test of my theory that the Sox should send Wakefield out there for
    Games 1-3-5 of any first-round wildcard series...
    
    glenn
    
63.1178IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Mon Aug 07 1995 17:3413
>Watch Joey Belle corkscrew himself into the ground...

Yeah, Glenn, but what if he connects on the way down?

BTW - his name is Albert, has been for a couple of years.  We're sending
him over to your house to explain it to you... :-)

I don't know if it's a test of 1-3-5, more a test of 1.  I keep thinking
Wakefield is going to come back to earth, and he keeps hanging up these
amazing pitching lines...


Roland
63.1179He may smash some windows if that knuckler ain't its best..EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Aug 07 1995 17:4513
> BTW - his name is Albert, has been for a couple of years.  We're sending
> him over to your house to explain it to you... :-)
    
    Yeah, I know.  "Keg party at my house after the game, Joey!"-- one of
    the all-time great lines uttered by a classy *Cleveland* sports fan... ;-)
    
    Actually, I've only reverted to calling him Joey after he inexplicably 
    started lobbing baseballs (with his arm, not his bat) over the Green 
    Monster during a game late last season.  Most bizarre...
    
    glenn
    
63.1180Sox win 1st of 2 game seriesFABSIX::E_MAXWELLOh flight attendent!Wed Aug 09 1995 05:445
      Tribe sure does look unbeatable. Just ask Tim Wakefield and
    the rest of the Red Sox. Boy do I feel like the groaner.
    
                                                     Lil Ed
    
63.1181Here's hopin they prove me wrongAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsWed Aug 09 1995 10:5712
    
    
    
    Don't be going and get to excited yet.  Wakefield pitched a great game
    but the Sox (- Tinsley and O'Leary) didn't hit very well.  I'm will not
    get down on them they played some pretty good D but Clark has an ERA in
    the Kevin Gross range and to muster only three runs off him will not
    win many games against the Indians.  We got Hanson going tonight and I'm
    not sure who goes for the Indians but I'll say this 5 runs will not be
    enough to win if your a Sox fan.
    
    Jerry
63.1182ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Aug 09 1995 12:114
63.1183SALEM::DODANo Alibis:Don'tGoThruLifeTryingToJustifyWed Aug 09 1995 12:527
Great game last night. I've been to about 20 games this year and 
somehow kept missing Wakefield's turn. Couple things I've noticed 
so far is that while the typical NY fan seems to have multiple 
pierced body parts, the typical Cleveland fan loves those plastic 
pocket protectors and doing the damn wave. 

daryll
63.1184RollwardWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mthe Halfway House Ruth Built...Wed Aug 09 1995 12:553
    
    
       Pocket Protectors.    :-)
63.1185ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameWed Aug 09 1995 16:103
63.1186Plastic Dolls >>>>pocket protectorsAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsWed Aug 09 1995 16:455
    
    
    C'mon Paul...they haven't had those out there in a few years. :*)
    
    Jerry
63.1187SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Aug 09 1995 17:106
  Yeah, I agree with Jerry. Mine's long since worn out and I can't find a
replacement anywhere.

  At least my inflatable alligator still works.

  George
63.1188ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the sameThu Aug 10 1995 02:387
63.1189Sox sweep indians in mini-seriesFABSIX::E_MAXWELLOh flight attendent!Thu Aug 10 1995 04:567
     Sox send tribe packing. groner, who cares about the season record.
    All that matters is the stretch run and post season. cleveland,
    W.S. chumps, er champs, anything less is a choke. Put your seatbelts
    on ladies, it's going to be a fun ride! Just remember, this isn't
    the movie major league, this is real life.
    
                                                          Lil Ed
63.1190Paul watch the game last night?AD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsThu Aug 10 1995 11:238
    
    
    
    re 63.1188
    
      I got the web-foot frog.  
    
    
63.1191Tribe goes ker-Plunk...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Aug 10 1995 13:139
    
    I think some of these Indians' relievers like Assenmacher, Plunk, Mesa
    must have sold their souls to the debil to be putting up the pitching
    numbers they have so far.  Hopefully they negotiated for a postseason 
    extension.  Last night's Eric Plunk is the one I remember-- under
    pressure, can't make a pitch to save his life...
    
    glenn
    
63.1192ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Aug 10 1995 13:385
    
    Nah, they're just tired (well, Plunk & Tavarez, at least).  Mesa,
    I might agree with you on...
    
    Joe
63.1194tribe series loss equals another go yanks pname - yek!ROCK::GRONOWSKISox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant!Thu Aug 10 1995 15:448
63.1195Just got my tickets!SALEM::DODANo Alibis:Don'tGoThruLifeTryingToJustifyThu Aug 10 1995 16:443
They're in Baltimore on Monday.

daryll
63.1196If'n you can call the inhabitants of the Bronx Zoo "people"EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Aug 10 1995 16:509
    
>    I'm gonna jump on this bandwagon.  There's only 3 good things about
>    the Yanks - Scooter, Donnie and the park.   
    
    Make that one good thing-- and only if you ignore most of the people
    that are in it...
    
    glenn
    
63.1197Thanks, Injuns!PCBUOA::MORGANFri Aug 11 1995 10:264
    GO TRIBE!  Stomp dem Yanks...You gotta like the double dunk of the
    Yankees yesterday.  Indians score 5 in the top of the ninth to win it.
    
    					Steve
63.1198ROCK::GRONOWSKISox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant!Fri Aug 11 1995 10:569
63.1199What led me to the teepeePCBUOA::MORGANFri Aug 11 1995 11:279
    It may sound wierd but I began to take a liking to the Indians once I
    became manager of the Indians Little League team in my town.  It wasn't
    so painful this year wearing an Indians hat around town.  If it means
    anything, the Indians of the Assabet Valley Little League were champs!
    
    I also helped coach my daughter's t-ball team, who were unfortunately
    called the Yankees.  I hope she isn't scarred for life because of it.
    
    					Steve
63.12008 back and fading fastAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsFri Aug 11 1995 12:199
    
    
    
    
      Its always a good day/night when someone anyone beats the Yankmees. 
    When they get swept in a DH and the Sox win it is even better.  Heres
    hopin the Tribe keeps up the good work.
    
    Jerry
63.1201ROCK::GRONOWSKISox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant!Fri Aug 11 1995 12:244
63.120210-6 would be a disappointmentAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsFri Aug 11 1995 15:254
    
    
    
      Wanna bet
63.1203 ~/~ SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIFri Aug 11 1995 15:304
  ... but the real question is, will the Browns ever be able to beat the
Steelers again?

  George
63.1204ROCK::GRONOWSKISox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant!Fri Aug 11 1995 19:066
63.1205Game one win and the Pats are on their wayAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsFri Aug 11 1995 19:499
    
    
    
    
    See ya in a couple a weeks Paul.
    
    Pats will cruise over the 'Spots
    
    Jerry
63.1206ROCK::GRONOWSKISox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant!Sat Aug 12 1995 11:207
63.1207WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MYanks are ascared to play injuns in the playoffsexMon Aug 14 1995 13:123
    
    
        I believe in the Indians.
63.1208IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Mon Aug 14 1995 13:187
>>"Yanks are ascared to play injuns in the playoffsex"

Chappy,

What's "playoffsex"?

Roland
63.1209WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MYanks are ascared to play injuns in the playoffsMon Aug 14 1995 13:213
    
    
    Woops that better????
63.1210IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Mon Aug 14 1995 13:413
I didn't want a correction, I wanted an entertaining explanation...
:-) :-) :-)
63.1211IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Mon Aug 14 1995 13:437
Possible definitions of "playoffsex":

o  First one to score wins?

o  It's only good for one of the teams?

o  When the series is over, everyone smokes a cigarette?
63.1212'course '78 was the best that it could beAKOCOA::BREENMon Aug 14 1995 19:452
    I know that prior to division playoffsex the American could only manage
    a single while the national went for 2 out of 3
63.1213wins another series...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERThu Aug 17 1995 18:2230
    
    	The Indians take the last of a 3 game series in Baltimore....8-5.
    
    	Jose Mesa gets his 34th straight save.
    
    	Kenny Loften and Manny Ramerez are named the player of the game.
    
    	Kenny Loften scores 3 runs, get 3 RBI's and hits 2 triples...one
    should have been a home run when it hit the hot dog in right field.
    
    	Manny Ramerez hits his 27th home run with two on to put the lid
    on the game.
    
    	Great game to watch on ESPN....I love it when they get those
    closeup shots with the sweat dripping off their faces.
    
    	One other thing to note...there must have 6 or 7 hits that went
    right up to the fence...a couple of feet more and THEIR OUT OF HERE!
    
    	Big park in Baltimore...that right field corner is the death trap.
    
    The Tribe comes home now to take on the Brewers....
    
    
    	Go CLEVELAND!
    
    
    		W A H O O  ......... T H E   C H I E F
    
    
63.1214USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Aug 17 1995 18:278
>    	Jose Mesa gets his 34th straight save.

Are you guys hoping he blows a save BEFORE the playoffs ?


>    	Big park in Baltimore...that right field corner is the death trap.

You're kidding, right ?  Even the Yanks hit a lot of HRs in Baltimore.
63.1215ERICF::MAIEWSKIThu Aug 17 1995 18:426
  I understand Mesa is closing in on the record for consecutive saves for
either the major leagues or the American League, I forget which.

  The Eck has the current record about 1 save ahead of Mesa.

  George
63.1216ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planThu Aug 17 1995 20:384
63.1217First Puckett now Bonilla?AKOCOA::BREENThu Aug 17 1995 20:472
    Regarding the hotdog in right field, they shouldn't put Bonilla out
    there anyway
63.1218ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Aug 18 1995 12:3712
    
>    Sure, but people still don't believe Mesa is as solid as Aggie, but
>    I won't mention your name Joe.
    
    Eh.  Right now, I'd still rather have Aggie.  If Mesa keeps it up
    all this year, and Aggie doesn't perform at least as well, then I'll
    probably switch my preference to Mesa after his first few performances
    next year.  But you have to admit - there was a lot of evidence that
    he _couldn't_ pitch effectively before he began demonstrating that
    he _could_ be an effective reliever.
    
    Joe
63.1219What's their problem with Milw ?USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Aug 18 1995 13:599
>    Sure, but people still don't believe Mesa is as solid as Aggie, but
>    I won't mention your name Joe.

Gee Groaner, you're doing the Waugaman thing...putting words in my mouth.
I've never said anything about Mesa-Aguillera.  All I'm saying is that
the chances of a pitcher converting every save opportunity through the
regular and postseason are probably very, very small.  Therefore, if I
were a Cle fan, I'd want him to get a blown save out of the way before
the postseason.
63.1220IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Aug 18 1995 14:015
Joe, do you walk down the street constantly looking over your shoulder?
:-) :-) :-)

There are multiple Joes in this conference...
63.1221SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERFri Aug 18 1995 14:0319
    
    	Well, the Indians loose the first game to the Brewers.....poor
    starting piching....Can't remember who started but the score was
    something like 7-zip after 6.
    
    	Indians seem to be taking things pretty lightly and not giving it
    their all since about two weeks after the all star break.  I would
    rather see them win every game.  I hate waking up in the morning and
    seeing they lost. 
    
    		COME ON NOW.....LET GET IT TOGETHER.  I DON'T WANT TO
    		SEE ANOTHER LOSS!  and I certainly don't want to see
    		the Red Sox get close to winning more game than the Tribe.
    
    	I'm actually still waiting for the Sox to run into their big 
    loosing streak that they have the pattent on.
    
    	The Chief,
    			WaHooooo
63.1222USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Aug 18 1995 14:053
Cruising the last half of the season is always a concern.  Teams surging
at the end always seem to carry the W's into the playoffs.  (see 1983
and Balt vs. Chi)
63.1223Trouble in Cleveland?TNPUBS::NAZZAROHow can people live in Florida?Mon Aug 21 1995 13:557
    Indians starting pitching is a real concern.  Martinez hasn't won in a
    month, Hill has been a disappointment, Nagy has had a couple of rough
    starts in a row.  They'd better start to straighten out soon.  Going
    into the playoffs playing .500 ball for the last two months of the
    season would be a bad omen.
    
    NAZZ
63.1224SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Mon Aug 21 1995 14:096
    
    	Now that Mesa has the record with 37 straight saves. Its time for
    him to blow one. Either that or wait until the Tribe face the Sox
    in the playoffs.
    
    Ron
63.1225ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planTue Aug 22 1995 10:585
63.1226Offense will only carry you so farAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsTue Aug 22 1995 11:106
    
    
    
    
      Shouldn't that read "Just imagine if the starting staff turns in
    around again."
63.1227ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Aug 22 1995 12:389
    
>      Shouldn't that read "Just imagine if the starting staff turns in
>    around again."
    
    Well, it could be that, but Paul's statement makes more sense.  There
    is no particular reason to believe, based upon past history, pitch
    counts this season, and so on that they _won't_.
    
    Joe
63.1228USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Aug 22 1995 18:197
*IF* pitching staffs start to slide LATE in the year, there usually isn't
a "turning around".  It usually has to do with tired arms, injuries, etc.

Despite all the good hitting, there is reason to be concerned if their
pitching *IS* sliding.  In the playoffs, good pitching beats good hitting...
especially in a best-of-5, where you'll likely see the other team's best
2 for four games.
63.1229Clemens beats angels, 6-4 finalFABSIX::E_MAXWELLOh flight attendent!Wed Aug 23 1995 07:2921
     Re -1 > IF* pitching staffs start to slide LATE in the year, there
    usually isn't
    a "turning around".  It usually has to do with tired arms, injuries,
    etc.
     
       I must agree totally with this one, the injuns are looking mighty
    tired walking thru the west. 
    
    btw I watched Major League 2 again yesterday. Damn if the character
        played by Randy Quaid isn't the Groaner! You know the guy, Tells
        his buddies at beginning of spring training how the indians are going
        all the way. At end of spring training when indians only went 3-27 how
        they will come around. When they are stinkin' up the joint he's
        all over the tribe screamin' at them how they all suck. At the end
        when the make it to the World Series he tell's them, " I told you
        at spring training they were going all the way!" But hey, maybe
        it's just me who thinks this.
    
           
     
                                                                 Lil Ed
63.1230ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planWed Aug 23 1995 11:2010
63.1231PCBUOA::MORGANWed Aug 23 1995 12:1012
    At least you could come up with some original material once in a while
    Groaner!  We've been hearing the same tired lines since April now, and
    they weren't even funny then!  We hear this shit all the time about the
    Sox futility.  Do you REALLY think YOUR comments bother us?  All you're
    doing is making an idiot of yourself.
    
    Now to the topic at hand.  Do you Indian fans have any concern at the
    way the team is playing right now?
    
    					Steve
    
    
63.1232SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Wed Aug 23 1995 13:0613
    
    	Speaking as a non-indian fan. The Tribe are do for a little let
    down. They have something like a ~17 game lead, and are making the
    playoffs. It don't matter how many games they win. They won't have
    home field advantage for the 1st round of the playoffs. Besides it
    seems every East Coast team. Either does rather well or pitiful on
    the second West Coast swing.
    	The Sox did the same thing. Started out hot then cooled off. Now
    they are hot again. I expect the Sox to cool off for a week or two.
    Then start picking it up again. Every team will have hot and cold
    spells. Its called who is going to be hot during the playoffs.
    
    Ron
63.1233ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Aug 23 1995 13:357
    
>    Now to the topic at hand.  Do you Indian fans have any concern at the
>    way the team is playing right now?
    
    Not really, no.
    
    Joe
63.1234The Cleveland slumpAKOCOA::BREENWed Aug 23 1995 14:3813
    What's the Indian's record during this "slump".   > .500 I'm guessing.
    
    It also seems like they're getting the clutch hitting they've always
    got and good all around, solid effort play.  None of the pitching in
    general throughout both leagues seems to be doing the job, not unusual
    for the dog days of summer.
    
    But I for one never was completely convinced that Cleveland pitching
    was overwhelming; I think it'll be satisfactory and the rest makes them
    a tough opponent - I'd like to see a Redsox - Cleveland ACLS finale.
    
    As a matter of courtesy it's okay for you to eliminate California while
    we beat that tough Texas club, Joe.
63.1235now doesn't that sound familiar!OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Aug 23 1995 16:404
63.1236ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planWed Aug 23 1995 19:565
63.1237CAMONE::WAYPick 'em up and strutWed Aug 23 1995 21:2711
>    re: .1231
>    
>    Do you think your comments bother me?  All you're doing is making an
>    idiot of yourself.


That sounds like the pot calling the kettle black.....


;^)

63.1238Time warpMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Mon Aug 28 1995 14:3326
This is old news to you folks, but Jeff and I watched two games from July
between the Indians and the Angels recently.  In the one, played in Cleveland,
the home team won in the 9th when Albert Belle hit a slam off of Lee Smith.
In the other, played in Anaheim, the home team won when Lee Smith shut down
the Indians in the 9th.  Hershiser (returning to Southern California for
the first time) and Finley were the starters, neither had much, and both
teams went to their very deep bull pens to keep the game close.

What a marvelous matchup of two superb young teams.  If you had told someone
two or three years ago that Cleveland and California were going to be the
two best teams in the AL, you'd have been locked up.  But both franchises
have that excellent blend of young talent and veteran experience, both
have deep pitching staffs, both can score in bunches.  The Indians have
more team speed, the Angels have better defense.

I find myself hoping (sorry, Red Sox fans) for a chance to watch a seven
game series between these two teams when I'm in LA in October.  Who knows,
it might even be possible to get into the ballpark.  Or have the folks in
Orange County finally figured out what's going on in the Big A, now that
the Rams are no longer soiling the grass?

If the absurd wildcard system results in Cleveland and California meeting
in the first round, it will be a travesty.  Who should I be rooting for as
the wild card, to prevent it?

Steve
63.1239ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Aug 28 1995 14:4810
    
> If the absurd wildcard system results in Cleveland and California meeting
> in the first round, it will be a travesty.  Who should I be rooting for as
> the wild card, to prevent it?
    
    Anyone _but_ Texas, Seattle, or Oakland.
    
    What great choices - the Seligs or the Steinbreners...
    
    Joe
63.1240SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Mon Aug 28 1995 15:005
    
    	California no longer has the 2nd best record in the A.L. The
    travesty will be the Red Sox and Cleveland playing in the 1st round.
    
    Ron
63.1241Time warp, as I saidMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944Mon Aug 28 1995 15:2013
Wow, Ron, that's news to me.  I didn't realize the Red Sox had been that
hot (or has the loss of DiSarcina so weakened the Angels).

But in a sense that's also good news.  As Joe indicated:  I will NOT root
for Steinbrenner or Selig, even if the alternative is a World Series
between the Cardinals and the White Sox.

Strictly speaking, it's not a matter of best records to me, it's just
that Cal-Cle is such a delicious matchup.  After watching two games of
it, I still hadn't figured out who I was rooting for; on a couple of
occasions, I shifted in midplay.

Steve
63.1242ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planMon Aug 28 1995 16:495
63.1243first time I heard it, I thought it was April 1st...IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 29 1995 12:5314
I keep hearing these rumors about the Tribe trying to pick up
Rickey Henderson.  And my question is:

			*** WHY? ***

Why deliberately bring a cancer into your clubhouse?  Especially when it's
the Rickey of 1995, as opposed to the Rickey of 1990 or 1991.  Gammons said
something about boosting the Indians hitting against righties(?), but added
that Rickey was only hitting .250 against them this year.

Leave him with Danny Tartabull where he belongs...

This would make *no* sense to me whatsoever - they've already got a carload of
cannons.
63.1244CAMONE::WAYPick 'em up and strutTue Aug 29 1995 13:0618
>			*** WHY? ***
>
>Why deliberately bring a cancer into your clubhouse?  Especially when it's
>the Rickey of 1995, as opposed to the Rickey of 1990 or 1991.  Gammons said
>something about boosting the Indians hitting against righties(?), but added
>that Rickey was only hitting .250 against them this year.


Kinda like the Yankee's getting Strawberry.


I hope the Indians DO get Rickey "I have the biggest ego in the world"
Henderson.....


'Saw


63.1245ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Aug 29 1995 14:237
    
    I hope so too, _if_ he comes cheap.
    
    I'd certainly trade a marginal prospect for Henderson, just to get 
    the draft picks...
    
    Joe
63.1246IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 29 1995 14:267
>    I'd certainly trade a marginal prospect for Henderson, just to get 
>    the draft picks...

Ahhh, the part I hadn't thought about.  *That* makes sense.

I wouldn't let him in the clubhouse, though.  I'd have him dress at home and
sit in the stands...
63.1247ROCK::GRONOWSKIThis is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding planTue Aug 29 1995 15:007
63.1248IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 29 1995 15:0614
>    What good are stats when people routinely make them up on the fly?!

A wonderful question - I wouldn't know since I got the stat from watching
an ESPN program.

If you saw the original entry, I also wasn't sure about the lefthanded/
righthandedness of the stat (hence the ?).

If you're accusing *me* of making up the stat, I don't appreciate it.  I make
it a point to put question marks when I'm not sure of something.

Even if Henderson is hitting over .300 on the side in question, I'm still not
sure I'd make such a trade - are the draft picks worth the pain in the butt of
having the guy?
63.1249OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Aug 29 1995 16:271
63.1250IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 29 1995 17:144
>    Unfortunately, you can't always trust stats from the media.

Get out of town! :-)
63.1251ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats rule Browns!Thu Sep 07 1995 11:064
63.1252CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MThu Sep 07 1995 12:204
>    Have the Sox ever won 100 games in a season?

Three times.

63.1253CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MThu Sep 07 1995 12:228
|>    Have the Sox ever won 100 games in a season?
|
|Three times.


Let me CLARIFY that.  Three times when they won the pennant.  It's possible,
though improbable that they did it in a year when they didn't win the pennant.

63.1254CSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Thu Sep 07 1995 13:183
    Was it 99 in 1978 or 100?
    
    
63.1255CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MThu Sep 07 1995 13:2513
>    Was it 99 in 1978 or 100?

I couldn't tell you right now.  If I remember tonight, I can find out.

I THINK it was 99, because the Yanks were 100/63, and they beat the Sox by
a game.  That would lead me to believe that the Sox were 99/63, missing the
Century by one game.


'Saw
    
    

63.1256ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats trounce Browns in high school stadiumThu Sep 07 1995 13:366
63.1257CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MThu Sep 07 1995 13:3911
>    
>    It was 99.  I do not think the Sox have ever won 100 games in a regular
>    season, and if they did, it was so long ago it don't count... heck,
>    i'm told the 1964 Browns championship is too long ago, so you can't
>    count anything in like 1918, when no one even owned a car.
>    

Careful Paul, if you spin much more you'll drill yourself right into the
ground.


63.1258CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MThu Sep 07 1995 13:436
Checking the stats, it was 1912, 1915, and 1946.

Those were all regular seasons.  The 1918 season was shortened, but I can't
remember why, perhaps because of the war.

You did say "ever"....
63.1259SNAX::ERICKSONGehring &lt;===&gt; RipkenThu Sep 07 1995 13:525
    
    	If I'm not mistaken. There was a season in which the Yankees won
    like 108 games. While the Sox won like a 102 and finished 6 back.
    
    Ron
63.1260WMGEN1::abs006p6.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYThu Sep 07 1995 15:204
The there was the season in which the Indians won more games than any team 
has ever one in the regular season.  How's they do the in that World Series, 
Paul?
63.1261USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Sep 07 1995 15:322
I was actually surprised to see in today's USA Today that the Indians
hadn't clinched yet...
63.1262EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Sep 07 1995 15:3413
    This may be "unofficial", but I remember reading once that the all-time 
    record for one particular team finishing ahead of another particular
    team in the standings is the Boston Red Sox over the Cleveland Indians,
    25 straight seasons, 1967-1991.  What we're being treated to here are
    the lingering aftereffects of 25 years of pent-up frustration.
    
    Now that the worm has turned, however briefly in relative terms,
    the pressure is definitely on the Indians to make something of their
    "success"...
    
    glenn
    
63.1263ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats trounce Browns in high school stadiumThu Sep 07 1995 16:5614
63.1264SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Sep 07 1995 17:1028
RE<<< Note 63.1263 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "Pats trounce Browns in high school stadium" >>>

>    What constitutes recent past?  1 year, 3 years, 5 years, certainly
>    not 77 years.
    
  Well it depends. My U.S. history teacher seemed to think that 200 years
was too recent and most important U.S. history happened between 1622 and
1700.

  Then again in England "the Bard" is considered modern and Jeffery Chaucer 
is fairly recent. I asked a monk in West Minster Abby where Chaucer was buried
and he said "Oh we buried Jeffery over where that pole stands just before
we put on the new wing". The new wing is at least 500 years old.

  Of course the Roman occupation of England was recent compared to the time
the Celts build Stone Henge but then some people say the ice age is fairly
recent when you consider how long the Dinosaurs have been dead.

  In fact all multi-cell life forms are fairly recent compared to the billion
or so years that the one celled ameba ruled the earth. And as for our solar
system? Why the sun is a 2nd generation star, there was probably a giant
blue star here before the sun that went super-nova 7-8 billion years ago.

  So no, 1918 isn't that far back. Like last year, it's history but recent
history. If the Indians want bragging rights, they've got to win the playoffs
like anyone else or people will be asking "what have you done for us lately"?

  George
63.1265and do it in this note ok?SALEM::DODAAsk me about my vow of silenceThu Sep 07 1995 17:405
Please George, tell us more....

Don't hold back. More, more, more.....

daryll
63.1266ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats trounce Browns in high school stadiumSun Sep 10 1995 14:0215
63.1267YEPFABSIX::K_JOHNSONMon Sep 11 1995 04:388
         Hey Groaner!!!
    
         Alright I have to say I agree with you on the matchups.
    Sheeeeesh!!! I agreed with you on something,I think i'm 
    breaking out in a rash.
      Alrighty Groaner,if the Indians were to make it to the
    WS,Do you think they could beat Atlanta,or Cinn?I know 
    the sox could.
63.1268ROCK::GRONOWSKISox swept by Yankees again!Mon Sep 11 1995 10:579
63.1269ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Sep 11 1995 12:035
  The last year the A's won the Pennant they got Swept by the Sox at Fenway
about a month before the Season ended. Big deal. As for Roger, he didn't pitch
in this series.

  George
63.1270ROCK::GRONOWSKIPats trounce Browns in high school stadiumMon Sep 11 1995 13:012
63.1271ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Sep 11 1995 13:113
  You brought up Clemens, I didn't bring up McDowell.

  George
63.1272GOT MINE...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERFri Sep 22 1995 14:2915
    
    	Well, I have my playoff tickets...4ea.  My Mom and brother was on
    the phone last Sat hitting redial for 1.75 hrs and finally got threw.
    
    	My tickets are for the 1st game on Oct 3.  
    
    	They said that because of the trouble with the phone company, they
    will not sell the remaining playoff tickets over the phone but now on
    a lottery.  So, I sent 25 bucks home so that my mom can buy $25.00
    worth of stamps and put my name in, what...83 times.  The lottery
    closes next Tuesday.
    
    	The Chief,
    		WAHOOOOOOOO!
    
63.1273IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Sep 22 1995 16:114
>    My Mom and brother was on
>    the phone last Sat hitting redial for 1.75 hrs and finally got threw.

They must be pretty light...
63.1274SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Sep 29 1995 19:457
    
    	Bean Ball game last night......
    
    	How dare they try and hit this years MVP....ALBERT BELLE.
    
    
    	WAHOO!
63.1275the tribe is not stopping until after they win the WS!ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allSun Oct 01 1995 23:357
63.1276Sox win series 3-1FABSIX::K_JOHNSONMon Oct 02 1995 06:1811
       
    
            I think Belle Should win it,but he won't.they will judge
    the vote on who is means more to there teams sucsess.Without Belle
    the Indians win by 20 games instead of 30.without Mo the sox are
    not even .500.On top of it all Belle is the biggest sh*thead.It's
    like a beauty contest and Belle ain't no Mr.Congenality.His personality
    or lack their of,is gonna cost him an MVP award that he deserves.
    Then ole Albert and the rest of the Tribe can cry all the way to 
    the golf course,beacause they will have plenty of time to think
    about how they choked in a measly 5 game set to the sox.
63.1277Belle had a monster year best since 78 and RiceAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsMon Oct 02 1995 11:1010
    
    
    
      Belle is lock for MVP.  Be serious 50 dingers in 144 games.  The man
    was on fire in Sept.  Ties Ruths record of 17 HR's in the month.  Belle
    has grown up since his Joey days and that will not have any effect in
    the balloting.  Johnson is a lock for the Cy with Wakefield as comeback
    player.
    
    Jerry
63.1278SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 02 1995 11:227
  Why should personality have anything to do with the vote? This is an MVP
award, not Miss Congeniality.

  I agree it could have an effect but that would only emphasize how nuts it
is to take seriously any vote by members of the sports press.

  George
63.1279SNAX::ERICKSONRed Sox - 1995 AL East ChampsMon Oct 02 1995 12:2211
    
    	There is only 1 possible reason why Albert Belle. Won't win the
    MVP award. Its if the writers look at this last month. As if Belle
    was padding his stats and swinging for the fences. Sort of like
    Cleveland already has clinched the division. What else is there to play
    for? I don't think they will and Belle will win.
    	Also want to say Congrats to the Indians and there fans. To win
    100 games in a shortened 144 game season. It speaks for itself. What
    a great season.
    
    Ron
63.1280ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allMon Oct 02 1995 19:0617
63.1281SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 02 1995 19:1211
  So he does win Miss Congeniality, give him some flowers. 

  I still don't understand why any of this should have an impact on the MVP.
Seems the most valuable player is the most valuable player regardless if he's
Joe Jerk or Charity Charlie. 

  Of course we all know that considering who's doing the voting, it's the guy
who gives the best interviews that will win hands down. On that score Mike
Greenwell is probably a top contender.

  George
63.1282sox win series 3-1FABSIX::K_JOHNSONMon Oct 02 1995 23:5810
      
          Hey Groaner,don't get your dress in a knot.I stated that
    Belle should win the MVP,but the way these sportswriters are 
    he probaly won't.NOBODY has had a year like Belle,padding his
    stats or not it really don't matter.I like to watch him play
    and my hats off to him and the rest of the Indians on an
    outstanding year.(to bad its gonna end so soon)
    
    
      
63.1283ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allTue Oct 03 1995 00:445
63.1284sox win series 3-1FABSIX::K_JOHNSONTue Oct 03 1995 05:287
            
    
            I don't really think you can say pad his stats.You
    just can't think that he is going to roll over and play dead
    because his team is 30 games up in the division.I think it probably
    a little easier to relax at the plate and swing away knowing that 
    fact.I'll give em credit he had a helluva year.
63.1285Simple mathTNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasTue Oct 03 1995 12:313
    As much as I like Mo, I gotta admit 50 doubles + 50 homers = MVP.
    
    NAZZ
63.1286ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Oct 03 1995 13:0623
    
>            I think Belle Should win it,but he won't.they will judge
>    the vote on who is means more to there teams sucsess.Without Belle
>    the Indians win by 20 games instead of 30.without Mo the sox are
>    not even .500.On top of it all Belle is the biggest sh*thead.It's
>    like a beauty contest and Belle ain't no Mr.Congenality.His personality
>    or lack their of,is gonna cost him an MVP award that he deserves.
>    Then ole Albert and the rest of the Tribe can cry all the way to 
>    the golf course,beacause they will have plenty of time to think
>    about how they choked in a measly 5 game set to the sox.
    
    Say we have two people, one a millionare and one a beggar.
    
    The millionare finds a dirty, rumpled $100 bill in the street.
    
    The beggar finds a crisp, new $5 bill in the street.
    
    The fiver is clearly of more importance to the beggar than the $100
    bill is to the millionare.
    
    But is $5 more valuable than $100?
    
    Joe
63.1287The Busting has begun...SNAX::ERICKSONRed Sox - 1995 AL East ChampsTue Oct 03 1995 13:129
    
    	A game hasn't been played. Yet, the mud slinging has already
    started. He who left me a note in my office this morning. Knows
    what I'm talking about. Have to admit I got a good laugh this
    morning, out of it. :^)
    
    Ron
    
    P.S. Karen wants a Indian napkin too.
63.1288ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allTue Oct 03 1995 13:158
63.1289SNAX::ERICKSONRed Sox - 1995 AL East ChampsTue Oct 03 1995 14:005
    
    	I'm game for P-name wagering. Sox win I pick a P-name for you.
    Tribe wins you pick a P-name for me. P-name to last for 1 week.
    
    Ron
63.1291...this is not an admission that I sent the stuff...ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allWed Oct 04 1995 17:065
63.1292CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Oct 04 1995 17:084
It's un-American NOT to draw a moustache on any Indians logo you see!


8^)
63.1293OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Oct 04 1995 18:221
63.1294Go Braves :*)AD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsWed Oct 04 1995 19:156
    
    
    
     Great Logo Karen.  Where can I get one?
    
    Jerry
63.1295SNAX::ERICKSONRed Sox - 1995 AL East ChampsWed Oct 04 1995 19:346
    
    	Has everyone in HLO. Seen what Karen did to Chief Wahoo? I'm
    waiting for just the right moment. To release my version of Chief
    Wahoo. :^)
    
    Ron
63.1296SNAX::ERICKSONRed Sox - 1995 AL East ChampsWed Oct 04 1995 19:364
    
    	I see that all the Cleveland fans ignored .1289.  :^)
    
    Ron
63.1298ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allThu Oct 05 1995 11:053
63.1299SWEEP?????SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Oct 06 1995 14:0222
    
    	Believeland.......you just got to!
    
    	What a game Tuesday!  I never had so much fun!  What a great place!
    
    
    	If I had gone to any other game there would be no way it could have
    	beaten this one.  This game was like the whole season rapped up in
    	one.
    
    	Who would have believed I had gotten tickets to that game.  So, I
    	turn around and drive back the same morning...3.5 hrs later.  I get
    	home and Mom is on the phone....she asks me if I feel like driving 
    	back.....WHAT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN...I say....Yep believe it or not,
    	she got 4 tickets to the ALCS.  She was picked in the lottery.
    	
    	I'll see if Dec will give me the time off....
    
    
    		WAHOOOOOOO!
    
    
63.1300Here's your cork baby!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Oct 06 1995 20:1913
    
    	One issue I haven't seen raised yet is the Jerk Kennedy's yanking 
    of Albert's Bat.  Cleveland people are so upset that they expect an
    appology from him.  You should have heard the radio stations talk.
    What was once just a game between the two clubs has now turned into
    a hate type of thing.  They just can't believe Kennedy would do such
    a thing.  To me, it just seems like they have stooped very low and it
    just doesn't make Boston look good.  How could you do that to the MVP?
    If someone thought Belle had a corked bat, don't you think it would
    have been checked long ago?  It just makes you look bad.  
    
    	Wahoo!
    
63.1301GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Fri Oct 06 1995 20:275
    
    	Question for you Hal.  Has Belle ever been busted for using
    	a corked bat before?
    
    Claybone
63.1302ERICF::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 06 1995 20:3113
  During the game they were talking about "the incident last year". I seem
to remember some story from last year about the umpire confiscating his bat,
some bat boy climbing over a partition and lifting it from the umpire's room,
and a big controversy that followed.

  Were those two incidents the same? If so, what was the outcome, was the bat
corked?

  If he's been caught before then it would seem that they were justified. If
he's never been caught before and if no former Cleveland player now on another
team offered "probable cause", then it would seem to be a cheap shot. 

  George
63.1303ROCK THE HOUSE!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Oct 06 1995 22:1321
    
    Yes, it was the same incident.  But, if you remember, Albert said that
    it was someone elses bat he had picked up....not his.  That was last 
    year....not this year.  And to beat all, his bat was sawed off and not
    usable.  Here you take the hottest hitter in the league and you take
    his bat and cut it up.  What kind of crap is that.  It just makes
    Boston look bad.  
    
    Clevelanders are really pumping up the rivalry thing between Hargrove
    and Kennedy which goes all the way back to when the two managed some
    AAA club in a playoff game years ago.  
    
    Like they say in Cleveland, don't piss Albert off.  This incident will
    put Albert to another level.  Weather you know it or not, Albert gets
    HOT when he is pissed.  A statement in the T&G this morning states that
    Albert said he gets more harrassment from Boston fans than any other.
    He said he is looking forward to it.   PUMP IT UP ALBERT!
    
    	The Chief,
    		Wahooo!
    
63.1304WELCOME TO THE SHOW!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Oct 06 1995 22:2128
    
    	While in Cleveland for the game, I picked up the WAHOO video. 
    Great thing it is.  12 of the best last at bat games at the JAKE.
    
    	Boston game at the Jake is #9.  #2 is the game Ek goes WOW when
    Manny hits the big one.  Game #1 is the very next night when Albert
    hits his grandslam to win the game in the last inning.  GREAT VIDEO!
    Another of my favorates is the game Cleveland is 8 runs behind after
    two innings and wins in their last at bat.  Video has many interviews 
    and tells why the team slaps the HR man that hits the game winner.
    
    	Another thing about going to the game...the 1st anouncement goes...
    
    
    	begin a low buzzing sound.........
    
    
    	LADIES AND GENTELMEN, NOW FOR THE MAIN EVENT.....I can't remember
    it all but the buzzing sound gets louder and louder until they anounce
    YOUR CLEVELAND INDIANS....this is the beginning of the end for the Red
    Sox!  
    
    	The Chief,
    		Wahoo!
    
    
    
    	
63.1305OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Oct 06 1995 22:391
63.1306Juuust abit outside....FABSIX::J_PAGEFri Oct 06 1995 22:455
    
     I'm glad Clevland put out a "Best of" tape.....a person can only watch
    "Major League I & II" so many times........ :-)))
    
    john
63.1307IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Sat Oct 07 1995 10:2639
>    	One issue I haven't seen raised yet is the Jerk Kennedy's yanking 
>    of Albert's Bat.  Cleveland people are so upset that they expect an
>    appology from him.

They've got a long wait.  And I would hope that "Cleveland people" in general
would have better things to worry about.

>   You should have heard the radio stations talk.
>    What was once just a game between the two clubs has now turned into
>    a hate type of thing.  

It seems to be just one-way, then.

>    They just can't believe Kennedy would do such
    a thing.  To me, it just seems like they have stooped very low and it
    just doesn't make Boston look good.  

>How could you do that to the MVP?

Last time I checked, Albert had never won the MVP award, and this year's hasn't
been announced yet. 

>    If someone thought Belle had a corked bat, don't you think it would
>    have been checked long ago?  

It was, a year or so ago.  And he was bagged.

>It just makes you look bad.  

I could say that about most of your notes... :-) 

>But, if you remember, Albert said that
>it was someone elses bat he had picked up....not his.

"If it does not fit, you must acquit!"

OK, Hal.  You're a cop.  You see a guy weaving in the road.  You check and find
out that the guy has a past DWI conviction.  You mean to tell me you're not a
little more likely to check and see if he's drunk?
63.1308The Show continues.....SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansSat Oct 07 1995 11:2914
    
    	Turn out the lights.......give me a broom......we'll see ya in
    	Cincinatti......
    
    	The Tribe takes care of Boston on a huge mid inning blast with
    	5 big runs.  
    
    	mOfer and jOfer go 0 fer 27 in the series.  
    
    	Bring on the Yanks!
    
    
    	WAHOOOOO!O!!O!O!O!O!
    
63.1309ROCK::GRONOWSKIYear 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996Sun Oct 08 1995 16:255
63.1310CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Oct 09 1995 12:2515
I don't know what the big deal about the bat is.  To me it's not all that much
different than a hockey manager questioning someone's stick, or the goalies
pads.

I guess in professional sports you try to get the edge anyway you can. 
Yesterday they were talking about Rodney Hampton's busted hand during the 
Giants game saying how it was a target for the Arizona defense.  If you know
it's hurt you go after it.

It's not all that different than the pine tar incident.....


If Albert has a problem because his bat got sawed open, and it'll affect his
hitting, you'd have to put for the premise that the power is in the bat and
not in Albert.  Personally, I just don't think that's the case.
63.1311MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 09 1995 12:3410
	Moreover, the Sox can't be blamed because the bat was sawed open
	rather than X-rayed; that was the A.L. office that was responsible.
	Moreover, Belle deserves the reputation - he was caught once, no
	matter what the excuse he gave was.

	Cleveland was just a much better team, and will be for the next 
	couple of years.  Still, anything can happen.

	Looks to me like an Atlanta-Cleveland world series.  I'd pick the
	Braves at this point.
63.1312SNAX::ERICKSONRed Sox - 1995 AL East ChampsMon Oct 09 1995 12:3519
    
    	Albert Belle might say he picked the wrong bat. Which is crap IMO.
    He used a corked bat last year. Remember someone broke into the
    umpires rooms and swapped bats. They used video replay of the previous
    2 games, plus the video from the bat being confiscated. To determine
    which was the correct bat. So Albert was using the wrong bat for 3
    games? Anyways that was last year, who cares.
    	The Red Sox scouts felt that a couple of Belle's homers in 
    September were suspect. Bad swings/contact and the ball still went
    out of the park.  I'm sure they had more information. What a better
    time to find out?
    	Also the Red Sox DID NOT saw the bat in half. It was ? Brown
    who was acting as the AL commissioner. Since he is/was a doctor.
    He felt is would be a waste of hospital resources to x-ray the bat.
    So he cut it in half. He later appolgized saying that if he knew. It
    was the bat Albert used to hit #50. He would not have cut the bat
    in half. So who in Cleveland didn't tell him?
    
    Ron
63.1313ROCK::GRONOWSKIYear 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996Mon Oct 09 1995 17:0943
63.1314Bush-league maneuver...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 09 1995 17:1113
>    They just can't believe Kennedy would do such
>    a thing.  To me, it just seems like they have stooped very low and it
>    just doesn't make Boston look good.  How could you do that to the MVP?
>    If someone thought Belle had a corked bat, don't you think it would
>    have been checked long ago?  It just makes you look bad.  
 
    Damndest thing; Hal's making a lot of sense here...
    
    
    glenn
    
                              
63.1315Gammons can and will be full of it, just like Indians' batboyEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 09 1995 17:1512
>    Read the Globe and Peter Gammons.  According to Cleveland sources,
>    they have a signed Jim Rice bat given to an Indians bat boy - ITS
>    CORKED!
    
    According to Peter Gammons, Bucky Dent's HR in 1978 was hit with
    Mickey Rivers' corked bat... by extension, maybe the entire 1978
    playoff was played with corked bats.  I think the game should be
    pulled, sawed open and re-played.
    
    glenn
    
63.1316GO M's!OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Oct 09 1995 18:161
63.1317EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 09 1995 18:2212
                                  
>    Anyone hear the radio call for last night's M's gamewinner?  Unbelievable!
    
    Yes, this morning.  I think that was Dave Niehaus from Seattle...
    
    Contrast that with Brent Mooseburger, whose obnoxious HR call (put
    it on the scoreboard! waitaminute folks, old Brent made a mistake,
    that was only a double) is starting to make Hawk Harrelson's sound 
    good...
    
    glenn
    
63.1318IMBETR::DUPREZCleveland Indians are king, Eddie Murray is gawd...Mon Oct 09 1995 18:339
>    Contrast that with Brent Mooseburger, whose obnoxious HR call (put
>    it on the scoreboard! waitaminute folks, old Brent made a mistake,
>    that was only a double) is starting to make Hawk Harrelson's sound 
>    good...

When he was no longer with CBS and was doing the World Lumberjack Finals
or some such nonsense, I was *so* happy.  Then he started doing more work
on ESPN, more on ABC.  And the idiot is back.  I hate him more than just
about anything sports-related...
63.1319OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Oct 09 1995 19:072
63.1320ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 10 1995 11:2414
63.1321IMBETR::DUPREZCleveland Indians are king, Eddie Murray is gawd...Tue Oct 10 1995 11:3315
If Seattle can get to game 6, this could get *very* interesting.

The Big Unit is really something to watch, now that he's learned to pitch
as opposed to just throwing.

Prediction:
	Game 1:		CLE
	Game 2:		CLE
	Game 3:		SEA
	Game 4:		SEA  (if Hill goes instead of Martinez)
	Game 5:		CLE
	Game 6:		SEA
	Game 7:		CLE

63.1322Is it one of those "hurt his feelings things"?PCBUOA::MORGANTue Oct 10 1995 11:405
    With the way Hershiser has been pitching, why wouldn't Hargrove swap he
    and Martinez?  Hershiser seems to have been the more effective pitcher 
    over the past month or so.
    
    					Steve
63.1323SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Oct 10 1995 11:5012
  If they use a 4 man rotation it doesn't matter, they each pitch once in the
1st 4 games and only the 4th guy doesn't get an "if needed" start. 

  And while other teams seem to be shifting to 3 starters, it's not clear the
Indians will go that way. 

  Speaking of which, it's funny that in the 1st year of extended playoffs so
many teams are going to a 3 man rotation. You'd think with the extra games it
would be more difficult for a pitcher to keep coming back one day short on
rest. A 3 man rotation makes more sense with a short playoff schedule.

  George
63.1324SNAX::ERICKSONParcells must go...Tue Oct 10 1995 12:0912
    
    	Remember Seattle is the home team, Don't ask why. I look for
    a split in Seattle the first two games. Seattle winning two out
    of three in Cleveland. Then Randy Johnson closing out Cleveland
    @Seattle in game 6.
    	During the regular season Ken Griffey. Was only available for
    1 of the 9 games played. In which Cleveland won five. Everybody on
    both sides. Did not play well against the other. Except for Jay Bunher
    who had 5 Hrs and 16(?) rbi's against Cleveland. Cleveland doesn't
    have a lefty starter. That can give Griffey trouble.
    
    Ron 
63.1325ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 10 1995 12:1313
63.1326IMBETR::DUPREZCleveland Indians are king, Eddie Murray is gawd...Tue Oct 10 1995 12:233
>    You can wish all you want, Cleveland will not lose this series.

Paul, can we count on you visiting Crow Cafe if they do?
63.1327ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 10 1995 12:274
63.1328IMBETR::DUPREZCleveland Indians are king, Eddie Murray is gawd...Tue Oct 10 1995 13:525
>    Reality is they will not lose, so I guess I don't have to worry about
>    it.

You don't have to worry about it - all you have to do is answer a direct
question.
63.1329MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Oct 10 1995 16:3812
    re: .1325
    
    Offense - even
    Starting pitching - advantage Cleveland
    Relief pitching - advantage Cleveland
    Defense - even
    Home Field - Seattle
    
    = Cleveland in 5 or 7 (Cleveland won't win game 6 in Seattle vs Johnson
      if it goes that far, Hershiser or no)
    

63.1330ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 10 1995 18:423
63.1331ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Oct 10 1995 19:329
    
    Adjusted to a neutral park, Cleveland scored the equivalent of 862
    runs, Seattle 792.
    
    Cleveland allowed 622 runs, Seattle 705.
    
    FWIW,
    
    Joe
63.1332SNAX::ERICKSONParcells must go...Tue Oct 10 1995 20:249
    
    	As always numbers can be mis-leading. Ken Griffey missed 6 weeks
    of the season. Would the Mariners have scored more? Would the Mariners
    given up fewer runs?
    	I'm not saying that Griffey would produce .48 runs a game more. To
    entirely make up the difference. He would have produced more, then
    whoever the M's had in center field.
    
    Ron
63.1333ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Oct 10 1995 20:308
    
    I'd agree; he most likely would.  I doubt he would have _saved_ any runs
    defensively (and would be surprised if he wouldn't have _cost_ runs;
    for all Griffey _looks_ good defensively, he covers far less ground
    than most any other CF around these days).  Overall, I'm certain
    the effect would be positive.
    
    Joe
63.1334Refreshing to see a couple superstars rise to the occasion...EDWIN::WAUGAMANStill just a rat in a cageTue Oct 10 1995 20:558
    
    Interesting how bigtime clutch Junior and Edgar Martinez were in that 
    Yankee series, as neither had ever played an "important" game in 
    their relatively long careers before the stretch run this season.
    Contrast Junior/Edgar with Mo/Jose, for example...
    
    glenn
    
63.1335ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 11 1995 02:194
63.1336MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 11:1510
>    Seattle wins game 1, 3-2.  Indians chance of winning the series drops
>    from 98% to 95%.
    

     Sorry, I think it drops their chances to about 50%.  Randy Johnson is
     probably a very good bet to win both his games, which would leave
     Cleveland needing a sweep of the other 4, 2 of which are at Cleveland,
     and 2 at Seattle.  Nice try at false bravado, however.  Cleveland in as
     close to a must-win situation tonight as you can get without facing
     elimination.
63.1337SALEM::DODAAsk me about my vow of silenceWed Oct 11 1995 13:044
The notion that Lou Pinella is the best manager in baseball gains 
momentum.

daryll
63.1338not sayin it won't happen AD::HEATHTribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sportsWed Oct 11 1995 14:509
    
    
       I wouldn't count on two wins from the Big Unit just yet.  Yea he has
    been impressive down the stretch, playoff game against Cal and the
    Stankees but this be the Indians.  The are two tiers above either one 
    of those aforementioned clubs toss in the Sox too.  You can count on
    a split for sure but not a sweep for Johnson.
    
    Jerry
63.1339MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 15:4413
>       I wouldn't count on two wins from the Big Unit just yet.  Yea he has
>    been impressive down the stretch, playoff game against Cal and the
>    Stankees but this be the Indians.  The are two tiers above either one 
>    of those aforementioned clubs toss in the Sox too.  You can count on
>    a split for sure but not a sweep for Johnson.
>    
>    Jerry

     Yeah, we could se how well they did against the Seattle ace, Bob Wolcott.
     No doubt Cleveland will just score in bunches against Randy Johnson.

     It's true that Johnson might not win one, but I sure wouldn't
     want to be down 0-2 and NEED a victory against him, either, would you ?
63.1340OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Oct 11 1995 16:235
63.1341MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 17:2410
>    Big Unit should take care of Cleveland.  the Indians aren't a very good
>    hitting team against lefties, never mind the best lefty in the game. 
>    They were only 8 games above .500 against lefties this year.

     8-0 against lefties would be a pretty good record.  What was the winning
     percentage (forget the 8 games over .500 bit).

     Still, I agree Johnson should be able to handle Cleveland, unless the
     Indians can get a 1-0, 2-1, or 3-2 type game out of Nagy.  I don't think
     they will.
63.1343MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 18:257
>      In typical Groiner fashion, he logs in at 23:19 last night
>     with the game results and then doesn't show his face here all
>     day.


      Yes, but no doubt he will do the exact same thing should Cleveland win
      a game in this series.
63.1344I don't even like the Indians but they will win this seriesAD::HEATHTribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sportsWed Oct 11 1995 18:2910
    
    
    <<< Note 63.1339 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
    
      Yup one game makes the Indians a bad team.  You bet.  Wolcott stepped
    in Leprauchan sh*t on the way to the dome.  The Indians swung at some
    bad pitches and it cost them.  i will bet you a pname they score more
    than 2 runs off of Big Unit.  And it will be enough to win.
    
    Jerry
63.1345MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 18:308
>    Offense EVEN?  Please explain how you came up with this?  Batting
>    Average?  Runs per game?  How?

     By comparing the batting orders.  Cleveland has an advantage at the top
     of the order (setting the table), and at the very bottom of the order,
     where Seattle is relatively weak.  However, the power spots in the order
     (positions 3 through 7) give an edge to Seattle, even with Belle having
     such a great year.
63.1346sox done - 'nuff said - tribe will win - bank on itROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 11 1995 18:387
63.1347MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 18:4025
>                                   i will bet you a pname they score more
>    than 2 runs off of Big Unit.  And it will be enough to win.
>    
>    Jerry


     Nah, I don't note enough in most weeks to make this any sort of a bet,
     and I'm really not against either Seattle or Cleveland.  On the other hand,
     Cleveland isn't really that much better than Seattle anywhere except in
     their starting pitching, and in that regard Seattle's win last night was
     a VERY big victory.

     Still, I don't think Cleveland will beat Johnson.  The M's may lose a game
     he starts by yielding runs late, but I'll show up in the crow note if the
     Indians belt him around.  At one point when Johnson was something like
     13-1, the Mariners had won all seven of the other games he had started and
     not finished (might have been six, but I think seven).  He wins ball games
     and keeps them in the others as well.  I don't think Nagy can beat 
     Johnson in game 3, and if Cleveland is down, they probably won't sned Hill
     in game 4, so it would be Nagy and Johnson again in game 6, this time in
     Seattle.

     Because of their pitching, Cleveland is overall a better team; BUT, this
     series looks to go 7 games at this point, and anything can happen in a
     winner-take-all game.
63.1348WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityWed Oct 11 1995 18:415
    
    
    
         Groan, Give these Sox fans a break. Can't you see they aint got
    a clue!!
63.1349MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 18:5115
>    Jerry, what do you expect from MIMS::ROLLINS_R.  In RED_SOX he's trying
>    to say that the HR that Belle hit was meaningless.  I thought the Sox
>    fans were supposed to be knowledgeable - but this guy calls a game
>    tying HR meaningless.  I guess he was looking for a Mo-FER type plate
>    appearance.

     In actuality, it was meaningless, because Cleveland lost, while a hit in
     the clutch would have given them a win.  Belle didn't come through when he
     could have won the game for them, and he didn't.  He didn't produce, he
     didn't do his job, he failed, and it cost Cleveland game 1.

     Other than inflate his stats, that home run did Cleveland absolutely no
     good.  None.  Nada.  Zilch.  And I'm sure if he were asked, Belle would
     admit he would have traded in that HR for a single in the earlier
     situation.
63.1350Asleep at the wheel...EDWIN::WAUGAMANStill just a rat in a cageWed Oct 11 1995 18:549
    
>    Groan, Give these Sox fans a break. Can't you see they aint got
>    a clue!!
    
    Just like Buck Showalter...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.1351Seattle in 4 FABSIX::J_PAGEWed Oct 11 1995 18:556
     How come Chappy and Groaner never face the fact that there teams lose?? 
    They both go by the same motto....."When in doubt insult the Red Sox"
    Can't you both admit you like the Sox?? You both seem to know more
    about them that the rest of us :-))
    
     john
63.1352WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityWed Oct 11 1995 18:573
    
    
    KK couldn't sniff Buck's Jock.
63.1353WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityWed Oct 11 1995 18:594
    
    
         All I know about the sox is that they are the classic example
    of FUTILITY year in and year out!
63.1354ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 11 1995 19:035
63.1355Just awesome!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityWed Oct 11 1995 19:044
    
    
         Not too mention there MVP candidate goin Mo fer 14 in the biggest
    games of his life.
63.1356nag,nag,nagFABSIX::J_PAGEWed Oct 11 1995 19:117
    
    Don't use that word choke to much...the Yankee's already did it and
    last time I looked Clevland was not winning there series. I am glad the
    Yankees spent all there money to get Wetteland,Mcdowell,Fernandez and
    rent the services of Cone.....They Really came throught in the clutch!
    
      john           
63.1357ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 11 1995 19:136
63.1358Sorry, couldn't resistMSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Oct 11 1995 19:226
    >> Probably the only thing that Boston has > Cleveland is 
    >> auto thefts and % of dunces in population.
    
       Of course, you moving from Cleveland to Boston didn't help
       us at all on that second thing.
    
63.1359MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 19:2321
>    Last I checked, Cleveland sent the Sox packing in three making them
>    look like a AAA team.  

     Absolutely right.  Cleveland is far superior in 1995, and those fans
     who are over 50 years old may remember Cleveland's most recent W.S.title,
     while you'd have to be as old as some of our distinguished noters in here
     to remeber a Sox W.S. title.

>    Of course, the Browns sent the Pats packing last year as well.  

     Possibly Cleveland is better than the Pats this year as well, but the Pats
     sent the Browns packing, and the Browns wins over relatively pathetic teams
     like Houston won't be too impressive when playoff time comes (if they
     should make the playoffs).  Someone has to make the playoffs from the
     only division that doesn't have a team with a winning record.

>    Cleveland Orchestra > Boston Pops.  Jacobs Field > Fenway.  

     Groaner, you ought to stop your notes earlier, while you can still focus
     enough to distinguish fact from fantasy.

63.1360seattle in 4FABSIX::J_PAGEWed Oct 11 1995 19:278
      
     That's it now you've really p!ssed me off! NOBODY...I mean NOBODY 
    insults the Boston Pops!!! I hope your cable goes out @7:55 tonight!
    
    BTW: Our % of dunces in population just went up....another boat load of
    cleveland refuges just arrived.
    
     john
63.1361MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 19:3122
>    Chappy, you've got to admit the Sox were awesome this year, with
>    choking in the playoffs and flying that 1918 banner in Fenway. 
>    A team to be feared!  A perfect example of how *NOT* to win
>    championships.

     In this regard, the Sox were not awesome, they were overachievers,
     without a heck of a lot of talent.  They had a great season, considering
     the talent level on the team.  Meanwhile, the Yanks seriously underachieved
     while Cleveland will also have to be considered underachievers if they
     fail to win the Series.  1954 may not be the only time a supposedly
     great Cleveland team came up short in a big way.

     Given the paucity of talent on the Sox team last year, I think they came
     as close as they could to winning a title in 1995.  However, I will give
     a big advantage to Cleveland in an example of how to win championships:
     not in what they've done on the field, but in the front office.
     The Indians' brass made the decision a couple of years ago to ink their
     fledgling stars (guys like Baerga) to longer-term contracts, and it's
     surely going to pay off for them.  The Braves' did the same with their
     young pitching staff several years ago, and it's a big plus to Atlanta
     fans to recognize that the Maddux-Glavine-Smoltz-Avery combo still has
     more time to spend in the south.
63.1362ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 11 1995 19:373
63.1363FABSIX::J_PAGEWed Oct 11 1995 19:401
    <---and Biggio will be in boston....
63.1364ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 11 1995 19:443
63.1365correctionFABSIX::J_PAGEWed Oct 11 1995 19:465
    
     When did the Sox come in second??? Last time I looked they came in
    first....the yankees came in second.
    
     john
63.1366ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Oct 11 1995 19:598
    
>     That's it now you've really p!ssed me off! NOBODY...I mean NOBODY 
>    insults the Boston Pops!!! I hope your cable goes out @7:55 tonight!
    
    I don't think Paul was - the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra _is_ a world
    class Orchestra with an international reputation.
    
    Joe
63.1367MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 19:594
>    Avery will be pitching for the Indians next year.

     Dream on.    

63.1368MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 11 1995 20:027
>    I don't think Paul was - the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra _is_ a world
>    class Orchestra with an international reputation.
    
     No one said they weren't.  However, they generally don't play the same
     kind of music and give the same kind of concerts.  It's like comparing
     the music at the Met with the Grand Ole Opry.  I wouldn't say one was
     greater than the other (Groaner might).
63.1369Now back to BaseballFABSIX::J_PAGEWed Oct 11 1995 20:067
>    I don't think Paul was - the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra _is_ a world
>    class Orchestra with an international reputation.
    
     All I know is that the Pops did the theme to Star Wars....now that is 
    world class!
    
     john
63.1370ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 11 1995 20:263
63.1371GLRMAI::FINIZIOWed Oct 11 1995 20:307
    
    Paul & Chappy ignore it......If the Yankees didn't loose and if the
    tribe didn't loose game one last night the attention would have to
    still be focused on the sox pitifull playoff performance....by talking
    about the Yankees so-called choking the tribe loss last night the
    attention is drawn away from MVP Vaughn and Madona's Boyfriend...
    
63.1372hello...hello...helloFABSIX::J_PAGEWed Oct 11 1995 20:301
    is there an echo in here??
63.1373talk about tiebreakersOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Oct 11 1995 21:032
63.1374SALEM::DODAAsk me about my vow of silenceWed Oct 11 1995 21:0713
                     <<< Note 63.1371 by GLRMAI::FINIZIO >>>

    
    >by talking
    >about the Yankees so-called choking 

    Up 2 games to none and needing only 1 win in the last 3 games to 
    clinch it. Holding leads in two of those games, one as large as 5 
    runs and still losing. Exactly what do you call that Bob?

    And he should've sent Leyritz up there the first time shouldn't he?

    daryll
63.1375ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Oct 11 1995 22:5111
    
>>    Avery will be pitching for the Indians next year.

>     Dream on.    
    
    Not my idea of a dream, that's for certain.  I'm not at all
    convinced that Avery will, from this point forward, be a very
    effective pitcher.  There are a _lot_ of other pitchers I'd
    rather take a chance on...
    
    Joe
63.1376ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 00:023
63.1377WMGEN1::abs002p3.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYThu Oct 12 1995 01:431
Is that a 95 or 98 % thing?
63.1378ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 02:285
63.1379Game 3 shocker in the makingFABSIX::E_MAXWELLN.E. Patriots...Bound to win one.Thu Oct 12 1995 06:0813
    Cleveland at               5        Final
    Seattle                    2
    
      The tribe takes game 2 tying up the series 1-1. Hargrove comes
    out with a stunner....A little known player who has been overlooked
    on the roster will start game 3........Paul Gronowski!!! He has 
    proven what he has time and time again, Big head, Big mouth, and no
    clue.8-))
    
                                      C'mon Seattle!
    
                                                       Lil Ed
    
63.1380ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 10:293
63.1381MMMMMWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityThu Oct 12 1995 11:1111
    
    
        Yeah the Yanks really hurt themselves spending all that money for
    Cone/McDowell/Sierra/etc...
    
    
          Good thing we didn't trade our best pitching prospect for a
    reliever that is going back to Minnesota. But he helped someone in the
    playoffs vs Cleveland!!!
    
    Chap
63.1382or artiste if you are frenchROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 11:163
63.1383ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 11:163
63.1384SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 11:308
RE    <<< Note 63.1380 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

>    No clue?  This from Lil Ed who predicted a sweep in the Division Series
>    - BY BOSTON!  Ha ha ha... fool.

  He was close, the Braves only lost one game.

  George
63.1385ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 11:444
63.1386SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 11:517
RE    <<< Note 63.1385 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
    
>    Check the map out pal, Atlanta ain't Boston.  The Braves left ...
    
  GET OUT!!!

  George
63.1387SNAX::ERICKSONParcells must go...Thu Oct 12 1995 12:0611
    
    Paul,
    
    	Who has more wins in the postseason, Dennis Martinez or Roger
    Clemens?
    
    
    
    	Roger Clemens has one and Martinez has zip.
    
    Ron
63.1388SNAX::ERICKSONParcells must go...Thu Oct 12 1995 12:087
    
    	Great pitching by Hershisher last night. Didn't see all of the
    game. However, ESPN was saying that between innings 2-8. Hershisher
    didn't throw more then 10 pitches in an inning. Which is remarkable
    in any game, never mind postseason.
    
    Ron
63.1389ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 12:2411
63.1390just curious...FABSIX::J_PAGEThu Oct 12 1995 12:4012
>     Who has more post season wins - Orel Hershiser or the entire Red Sox
>     pitching staff?
    
>      'nuff said
    
 
      How many wins does Hershiser have???  And how many does Z.Smith, 
    Aggy, Wakefield, Clemens, Stanton, Belinda have??? I know Aggy was the
    winner of the infamous game 6 in '86 while with the mets, and Wakefield 
    won a couple for pitt.....
    
     john
63.1391Cleveland == fairweather fansMSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Oct 12 1995 12:4611
    
    
       When Brent Musberger committed that minor faux pas by
      calling the Mariners fans "frontrunners" and saying for 
      "the last 19 years you couldn't give tickets away here",
      he could just have easily been talking about Cleveland
      as well. Spout all the nonsense you want, Groiner but
      inspite of the years of futility Boston is still one
      of the best baseball towns in America. Cleveland, on 
      the other hand, is one down year from turning Jacobs
      Field into a mausoleum.
63.1392Shut up Brent, just please shut up...EDWIN::WAUGAMANStill just a rat in a cageThu Oct 12 1995 12:499
    
>      When Brent Musberger committed that minor faux pas by
>      calling the Mariners fans "frontrunners" and saying for 
>      "the last 19 years you couldn't give tickets away here",
>      he could just have easily been talking about Cleveland
>      as well.
    
    Oh, baby!
    
63.1393SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 12:517
  At one point in the middle of the game last night there seemed to be some
sort of chant going on. It was right when Musburger was doing his living eulogy
to Jim Kaat. Anyone know what the fans were saying? I couldn't make it out.

  It wasn't the Edgar chant, I think Vizquel was up but I'm not sure.

  George
63.1394ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 12:579
63.1395SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 13:015
  Hey, Boston won the 1st World Series back in 1903, why do we need another?
As the saying goes, "Been there, done that". 

  On to something else,
  George
63.1396SNAX::ERICKSONParcells must go...Thu Oct 12 1995 13:1019
    
    Paul,
    
    	I'm not whining or being a cry baby. The Sox lost to a better
    team, 'nuff said.
    	However you continue to single out INDIVIDUAL players. In
    particular you keep bashing Roger Clemens post season record. You
    bash his 1-2 record in post season play. Which is comprised from
    11 post season starts. What happend in the eight no decisions? Is
    it Rogers fault, That Stanley, Shiraldy (?), and Buckner screwed
    up game 6 in '86?
    	Name ONE Cleveland pitcher. Who has pitched in more post-season
    games for Cleveland. Then Roger Clemens has for the Red Sox. Answer:
    You can't find one. Did the Sox win the World Series in '86, '88, or
    '90. NO, Did they have a better chance then Cleveland in those years?
    YES.
    
    
    Ron
63.1397ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 13:2115
63.1398Clevelanders == fairweather fansMSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Oct 12 1995 13:3715
    
  >> If you remove Fenway and put a 70,000+ stadium in Boston that was built
  >> in 1932, does Red Sox attendance increase or decrease?   

     Kill the weak excuses. It ain't like you *had* to sit in nosebleed 
     seats. For the last twenty years or more, you could go to Municipal 
     Stadium and get great seats on either baseline at gametime. That's 
     how pathetic the fan support was. And we're not talking about New York, 
     LA, Chicago or San Francisco where there are a mulitude of entertain-
     ment options. We're talking about a town, where until they built the 
     rock and roll hall of fame, the main form of entertainment was going 
     down to the highway and cheering for the out of state trucks. 
    
    
    
63.1399So I took her to ClevelandSALEM::DODAAsk me about my vow of silenceThu Oct 12 1995 13:443
The punchline.

I'm sure you know the joke.
63.1400In reality, removing great team/stadium factors...EDWIN::WAUGAMANStill just a rat in a cageThu Oct 12 1995 13:488
>                     -< Clevelanders == fairweather fans >-

    Cleveland == football town, minus the football team...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.1401SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 13:5721
RE    <<< Note 63.1397 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

>    Name one AL team that has won less WS titles than the Red Sox in the
>    last 75 years.

  Name one AL team that has won less WS titles than the Indians in the last
46 years. Big deal.

  There is an AL team that has gone longer than the Red Sox. The White Sox
have not won since 1917.
    
>    Indians will rule.  You baby sox fans who can't take the sweep will
>    soon be on Atlanta's bandwagon.  Sox fans are proving why bandwagon
>    jumping is synonymous with Boston Sports fans.

  I've been a Braves fan since I moved to Boston 5 years ago. And I've got
the proof. I selected the Braves as the basis for my SNAL Rotisserie team
back around 1990 before anyone knew they were any good.
    
  GO BRAVES!!!!
  George
63.1402OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Oct 12 1995 14:564
63.1403this one got me rolling! ;-)OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Oct 12 1995 14:572
63.1404MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 12 1995 15:2410
>    Will the Indians sweep in Cleveland?  Johnson *MUST* win tonight or
>    its over - Bosio and Benes are done.  Hershiser will win the series
>    on Sunday night for the tribe.  Yahoo!

     Sort of agree with Paul on this one, except the game is tomorrow instead
     of today, but Seattle must win game three, just as Cleveland had to win
     last night.  Seattle is 28-3 in games Johnson has started this year, so 
     there is an excellent chance he will.  That would return HFA to the
     Mariners, and would probably send Martinez against the M's in game 4
     instead of Hill.
63.1405SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 15:2513
RE          <<< Note 63.1402 by OUTSRC::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>

>>    Check the map out pal, Atlanta ain't Boston.  The Braves left because
>>    they were tired of playing in the "City of Losers"!
>    
>    they've really done a lot since then too.

  The Braves won it all in 1957 while they were in Milwaukee.

  That was the team with Hank Aaron, Lou Burdette, Warren Spahn, Eddie Mathews,
Del Crandal, etc.

  George
63.1406OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Oct 12 1995 15:261
63.1407ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 15:485
63.1408SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 15:529
  When you children leave home are they no longer your kids?

  The Braves played in Boston for 76 years. They were only IN Milwaukee for 12
and Atlanta for about 30. 

  Home plate is still in place at Braves Stadium in Boston.

  GO BRAVES!!!
  George
63.1409i rest my caseROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 16:022
63.1410ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 16:174
63.1411SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 16:1811
RE    <<< Note 63.1409 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
>                              -< i rest my case >-
>
>    So George, how many Boston Braves did you go to?

  I'm trying really hard to parse this question. Are you sure you want to rest
your case this early? If you do I'll probably win on a summary judgment.

  How does one go to a Boston Brave?

  George
63.1412Oh, thanks for the swell nappyAKOCOA::BREENOnions, Tortellini and ThouThu Oct 12 1995 16:1910
    I went to Braves field and saw Sam Jethroe play, he had been rookie of
                     ^^^^^^
    the year in 1950.  And I had Torgeson and Logan and Spahn and others in
    their glorious Boston braves attire, still my favorite rags.
    
    But I was born into the Redsox side of a multi-baseball family, my
    aunts were Braves fans and like many stayed Braves fans during the
    hiatus - yes, some still expect them back.
    
    bte
63.1413Friend and I concluded this the other night...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 12 1995 16:287
> At one point in the middle of the game last night there seemed to be some
> sort of chant going on. It was right when Musburger was doing his living eulogy
> to Jim Kaat. Anyone know what the fans were saying? I couldn't make it out.
    
    Cooo-bain!  Cooo-bain!
    
63.1414SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 16:3116
RE    <<< Note 63.1410 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

>    Well, answer the question.  Have you ever been to a *BOSTON* Braves
>    game, or are you using the history of the team as an excuse to jump
>    on the Atlanta Braves bandwagon - either way, its a bandwagon jump.

  Well I guess it depends on how you define a bandwagon jump. I've always been
a BoSox fan but I've been a Braves fan since I moved to Boston about 10 years
ago. When I was living in Western Mass I was a BoSox fan first and a Giants fan
2nd because the New York Giants use to have a minor league team in Springfield
Mass. 

  How long have you been an Indian's fan? When did you jump on the Indian's
bandwagon?

  George
63.1415SNAX::ERICKSONParcells must go...Thu Oct 12 1995 16:345
    re .1414,
    
    	Better yet, Has the Tribe won a Championship in your lifetime Paul?
    
    Ron
63.1416ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Oct 12 1995 16:364
    
    FWIW, I'm convinced that the Indians will win Friday, Johnson or no.
    
    JOe
63.1417ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 16:5110
63.1418ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 16:524
63.1419MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Oct 12 1995 17:4314
    
      >> I've been an Indians fan all my life.
    
         Sure you have. Just like all those folks packing Jacobs
         Field these days. You guys just didn't go to games before
         because:
    
          a) Municipal was a big old park. 
          b) the sun was in your eyes.
          c) the baseball schedule often conflicted with
             Gilligan's Island reruns.
          d) your dog ate your homework
          e) all of the above
    
63.1420whatever you say OJ...ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 18:224
63.1421;-)OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Oct 12 1995 18:231
63.1422And I have to say I'm thoroughly enjoying it!!!PCBUOA::MORGANThu Oct 12 1995 18:413
    Groaner, give it up man!  You're getting torched!
    
    					Steve
63.1423Sox fans wear diapers!ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 18:5018
63.1424SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 19:0714
RE    <<< Note 63.1417 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

>    I've been an Indians fan all my life.
>    
>    Bandwagon jumping - having a lame excuse to root for a team.  Example -
>    I moved to Boston 10 years ago, and that's when I became a Braves fan.

  So what's your reason for being an Indians fan? If moving to an area is a
lame excuse then living in that area from the start must be almost as lame.

  If you can't come up with a good excuse for why you have been an Indian's
fan all your life then you must be an Indians Band Wagon jumper.

  George
63.1425ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 12 1995 19:117
63.1426PCBUOA::MORGANThu Oct 12 1995 19:219
    RE: .1423
    
    Excellent response, Paul!  Perfect example of GroNOlogic! 
    
    GroNOlogic :== Distort principles of logic to promote own message of
    		   illogic.  Typically practiced by mentally constipated
    		   Clevelanders. 
    
    					Steve
63.1427SNAX::ERICKSONParcells must go...Thu Oct 12 1995 19:2212
    
    	Paul,
    
    		You keep leaving out that I said "The Sox lost to a better
    team". I'm not disapointed that the Sox lost. The Indians earned the
    sweep and I congradulated them on it.
    	Actually I have seen MY TEAM win the World Series in my lifetime.
    Do I dare say I was born and raised on Long Island NY. Was a Mets fan
    until I moved to Mass. at a young age of 7. Became a Red Sox fan, but
    still follow the Mets.
    
    Ron 
63.1428SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 12 1995 19:2437
RE    <<< Note 63.1425 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

>    Which excuse is more lame?
>    
>    1)  I was born in the city and followed the team since childhood.
>    
>    2)  I moved to the city where the team was founded, of course the
>        team had been gone for some 30 years by the time I moved there.

  Well, considering that there is only one reason for sports and that reason is
entertainment, I'd say that you can be a fan for any reason that moves you. 

  Think about it. Why should anyone be a fan of any team? Most people don't
know the owners, they don't know the players, most of the players come from
somewhere else, why should anyone care how a bunch of guy's from somewhere else
that they've never met win or lose? And to top it off, it's only a game with no
real meaning what ever. Why care who wins at all? 

  The answer is, you care because you want to care. You identify with the team
for what ever reason you feel like identifying with the team. 

  While I was in Western Mass I was a Giants fan in part because I hung around
with older kids that had stories about how they use to go to minor league
Giants games before the big league club moved out west and their minor league
team left Springfield. And part of it was because I liked Willie Mays. 

  Now I'm a Braves fan because some of the older people in town talk about how
the team was once here and because I go by their old park all the time. I've
read about the old Braves teams and what it was like when they were in Boston.
It's a connection with Boston's history. I also like them because they are on
TBS and they are the National League team we get to see and I like them because
I feel like it.

  Is that lame? Of course it's lame. Liking any team is lame. Your "I've been
a fan all my life" is lame. But so what, it's fun. 

  George 
63.1429MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Oct 12 1995 19:3140
   
    >> Anyone who knows me personally 
  
       Has my sympathy.

    >> They just can't accept that the Sox lost to the Indians so
    >> they question all Indians fans, 

       I questioned Indians fans before it was even determined that
       they'd even be playing the Sox in the playoffs. Baseball in
       Cleveland for years was the very definition of apathy. Then all 
       of a sudden management puts together an admittedly great team
       and the 'lifelong fans' come crawling out of the woodwork. I
       ain't buying. I'm sure Glen hit the nail on the head when he
       said that Cleveland is a football town. A losing baseball team
       in Don King's hometown, new stadium or no, would draw just like
       Cleveland always had for years and years and years. Poorly.
       Beyond poorly. Like second helpings on the punch at Jonestown.
       But enjoy it while it last because in this era of big money and
       free agency it probably won't last all that long and then you'll
       see Jacobs Field do a slow metamorphosis into the same empty
       no man's land that was Municipal Stadium.
    
    
       BTW - this new influx of New England Patriots fans is no 
             different. BBT (Before Big Tuna) there'd often be
             as many fans from the opposing team at Foxboro as
             there were Pats fans. Especially if the Bill, Jets
             or Giants were in town. And the lame ass stadium 
             excuse that Clevelanders like to use wasn't the 
             reason why because they still play in the same place 
             and yet ABT (After Big Tuna) there's real hope and 
             the parking lot at Foxboro on select Sundays is full
             and alive with the sounds of the Village People and 
             the smell of overcooked chateau briande. But all it
             will take is two or three losing seasons and Kraft
             and company will find out that Boston belongs to
             the Sox and the Bruins.     
    
    
63.1430show some mercyAKOCOA::BREENOnions, Tortellini and ThouThu Oct 12 1995 19:435
    Tommy,
    	Don't tell them those are reruns, you have a truly cruel streak,
    young fella.
    
    bte
63.1431Tommy - Captain AnalogyMYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Thu Oct 12 1995 20:006
>>Like second helpings on the punch at Jonestown.

Where do you come up with these gems?

Thanks for the laugh,
Mike
63.1432MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 12 1995 20:0917
>       But enjoy it while it last because in this era of big money and
>       free agency it probably won't last all that long and then you'll
>       see Jacobs Field do a slow metamorphosis into the same empty
>       no man's land that was Municipal Stadium.

        Cleveland has done a good job a tying up some of its younger players
        to longer term contracts, so it may be a while before these Indians
        become as pathetic as the teams Groaner is used to rooting for.  I
 	do agree that if the front office doesn't stay on top of things,
	Cleveland is probably not a franchise that will attract the types of
	players on the free agent market to enable them to compete.

	Just like anywhere, fans in Cleveland are not going to attend lower
	division baseball year after year.  Boston fans didn't prior to '67,
	and wouldn't if the Sox sank to the depths the Indians had played at
	prior to the last couple of seasons.
	
63.1433paul, remember when.... FABSIX::E_MAXWELLN.E. Patriots...Bound to win one.Fri Oct 13 1995 02:136
     All this talk about bandwagon jumping from paul makes me chuckle.
    Does anybody recall the string of "my favorite hockey team has always
    been..." from paul last season? That favorite team being the one
    winning the series at that time.
    
        					Lil Ed
63.1434I'm pissed now.....CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Oct 13 1995 12:1248


	I've been out sick a few days this week, and in between that
	I'm working on the project from hell.

	I get some mail this morning from a RON who's a little put off
	by the "really bad LDUC" going on in Sports.

	I come in here and take a look, and then decided I must be
	in the Kindergarten conference.


	I'm getting a little bit tired of all of the insults and personal
	attacks and stuff like that.  If you're happy your team won,
	fine, great, good I'm glad for you.  That doesn't give you the
	right to disparage anyone else, their team, their fans, and make
	sniping remarks about it.  We are SUPPOSEDLY adults.

	If your team didn't win, it's great to be happy that someone else's
	team didn't win, but you don't have to throw insults and personal
	remarks around.  You don't have to snipe either.  Again, we
	are SUPPOSEDLY adults.

	This is not the Cleveland is or isn't better than Boston note.
	This is not the my team is great your team wears diapers note.
	This is the Cleveland Indians note, and last time I looked, 
	Cleveland was playing in the ALCS.   Would any of you fine noters
	have something CONSTRUCTIVE to say about that by any chance??????
	

	You wanna do that insult stuff, get a newsreader, surf the Usenet 
	newsgroups with all the 12 years old from America On-Line that are 
	so upset that 	they can't find the dirty pictures on the net that 
	they resort to 	telling you that <insert team name> fans are 
	homosexuals.  I mean, that's where I'm thinking some of this 
	bullshit I've been reading belongs.


	Clean it up people. I don't know if it's something in the water,
	or something in the air, but this stuff stops and it stops here.
	And it stops NOW.


'Saw


	
63.1435'nuff said!ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 13 1995 12:269
63.1436ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsSat Oct 14 1995 01:3813
    
    Well, I was wrong about Johnson - I expected his heavy workload
    of late to hurt him, and it hasn't noticably...
    
    OTOH, as of ten minutes ago at least (I hereby note that I _hate_
    following Tribe playoff games on WWW, though it's better than
    nothing...), the game's tied.  Nagy was every bit as good as
    Johnson.
    
    I really hope they pull out the win...
    
    Joe (just in the mood to talk to myself, and _not_ work for a
         minute...)
63.1437ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsSat Oct 14 1995 02:202
    
    Bleck.
63.1438You are what you useFABSIX::E_MAXWELLN.E. Patriots...Bound to win one.Sat Oct 14 1995 07:2825
     In response to note .1434,
    
    
        Note 245.6                     Colorado Avalanche                       
    6 of 14
    CAM::WAY "Nine to the front, six to the rear"         6 lines 
    13-OCT-1995 09:18
    
    The Queebs by any other name are still the Queebs....
    
    
    Bruins sucked pond water against these guys.  One "LUCKY" goal.
    
    Kasper the Friendly Coach sucks.
    
    
    
    Do you remember this note?!?!?!  Practice what you preach!;^)
    
    
    
                                                        Lil Ed
    
                          
                                                    
63.1439Be nice or the principle will yell again...FABSIX::J_PAGESat Oct 14 1995 11:547
     Jay Buhner, goes from hero to goat to hero in the same game......
    M's take a 2-1 lead in the series........tonights(sat) game is a must
    win for the tribe or they are in serious trouble.......Hill goes for
    the Tribe, Benes for the M's....Is this Hill's first ever post season
    start?????
    
      john
63.1440ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sat Oct 14 1995 12:062
63.1441ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsSun Oct 15 1995 01:5511
    
    Re .1440
    
    Good call...
    
    Thankfully, it didn't matter.
    
    It would take a lot for this _not_ to be a great series, when all's
    said and done...
    
    Joe
63.1442ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Oct 15 1995 15:0110
63.1443SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 16 1995 11:558
  Nope, another squeaker. And it may be Wolcott in game 7. 

  Meanwhile the only stress on the arms of Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, and Avery
is an occasional heft to their beer mug as they sit in front of the TV watching
to see which of these teams will emerge bloody and tired to face them in the
Fall Classic. 

  George 
63.1444MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 16 1995 12:0213
	Cleveland should lose game 6, and win game 7.  However, the
	Indians offense has given no real indication they are going to hit
	Johnson or Wolcott hard, and I would expect a tight game in both
	outings.

	Things are looking pretty good for Atlanta.  The Indians
	"high-powered" offense has taking a nose-dive against generally
	mediocre Seattle pitching.  What will it do against a team with
	the major league's best pitching staff ?  The Indians better hope
	that their pitching staff can continue what it is doing to a Seattle
	offense that is much better than the Braves have to offer.  On the
	other hand, Atlanta can hope Eric Plunk continues to shine, should
	Cleveland make it to the W.S.
63.1445MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 16 1995 12:1418
	ALCS:

	Contributors:

	Cleveland:  Orel Hershiser (+++), Ken Hill (++), Kenny Lofton (++),
	Jim Thome (++), Manny Ramirez (+), Paul Assenmacher (+), Jose Mesa (+).

	Seattle:  Bob Wolcott (++), Randy Johnson (++), Norm Charlton (++),
	Jay Buhner (+).

	Detractors:

	Cleveland:  Eric Plunk (--), Dennis Martinez (-), Omar Vizquel (-),
	Paul Sorrento (-), Albert Belle (-).

	Seattle:  Andy Benes (---), Edgar Martinez (---), Tino Martinez (--),
	Ken Griffey (-), Tim Belcher (-), Chris Bosio (-1/2).
		
63.1446ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 16 1995 12:159
63.1447ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 16 1995 12:179
63.1448MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 16 1995 12:2117
	Should be a good game Tuesday, with Johnson again shutting down
	the slumbering Indian bats.  Look for another close game, unless
	the Martinez boys come to life.  I look for a Seattle 3-1 or 3-2
	victory, as the Mariners go to 5-0 in games this year when they face
	elimination.  Game 7 should be great; Nagy pitched much better than I
	had expected he would, as did Wolcott.  I would expect Belcher would
	get the game 7 start, however, giving the Indians the edge they need
	to move on to the W.S.  Any thing less would be a major league choke
	job, and the Indians have responded adequately, thus far, to the first
	real pressure they have faced this year.

	On the other hand, you'd really have to say both sides have played
	rather sloppy baseball in this series, both on defense and offense
	(not advancing runners many times, leaving many, many runners on base).
	Atlanta would have to be considered slight favorites against either
	team when the W.S. begins.
	
63.1449SNAX::ERICKSONAnybody but Cleveland...Mon Oct 16 1995 12:277
    
    	I see Groaner has stopped his BS in here. Just brought it over
    to the Red_Sox conference. Red_Sox conference has a nice TPU file.
    It allows you to extract out all of the notes. Then ignore all of
    Paul's, gotta love it. Groaner_free.tpu. 
    
    Ron
63.1450SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 16 1995 12:338
  I missed the beginning, why didn't Martinez pitch last night? Seems it was
his turn.

  Everyone's expecting low scoring games but with the pitching getting more
and more tired it seems we are about due for a slugfest. It would be fun of
one of these games ends up something like 12-10.

  George
63.1451SNAX::ERICKSONAnybody but Cleveland...Mon Oct 16 1995 12:3422
    
    	On a more serious note. Great weekend of baseball. Good pitching
    duel between Johnson/Nagy on Friday night. With Bunher making up
    for the error. With an 11th inning homerun.
    	Cleveland gets great pitching from Ken Hill on Saturday. To
    shutout Seattle 7-0. Albert Belle didn't play in the game. Sprained
    ankle from a HBP, Friday night. Cleveland HAD to win on Saturday and
    they did just that.
    	Last night in what I would consider another must win game for
    Cleveland.  The game was a little sloppy with 6 errors being
    committed. Jim Thome's clutch 2 run homer in the 6th put Cleveland
    ahead 3-2. The key to the game was the top of the 7th inning.
    Paul Sorento committs 2 errors. I personally thought the 2nd error
    was bogus. Visquel's foot didn't come off the bag, until after he
    had the ball. Anyways, first and third 1 out. With Griffey coming to
    the plate. Paul Assenmacher strikes him out on 4 pitches. He then
    gets Buhner to strike out also. Griffey just needed to get the ball
    in play, to tie the game.
    	The eight inning was just as exciting. Could Sojo have hit the
    ball any harder? Oh, well on to Seattle Tuesday night.
    
    Ron
63.1452ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 16 1995 12:384
63.1453SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 16 1995 12:433
  Martinez, why didn't he pitch?

  George
63.1454\MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 16 1995 12:4425
>    	Last night in what I would consider another must win game for
>    Cleveland.  The game was a little sloppy with 6 errors being
>    committed. Jim Thome's clutch 2 run homer in the 6th put Cleveland
>    ahead 3-2. The key to the game was the top of the 7th inning.
>    Paul Sorento committs 2 errors. I personally thought the 2nd error
>    was bogus. Visquel's foot didn't come off the bag, until after he
>    had the ball. Anyways, first and third 1 out. With Griffey coming to
>    the plate. Paul Assenmacher strikes him out on 4 pitches. He then
>    gets Buhner to strike out also. Griffey just needed to get the ball
>    in play, to tie the game.

     I agree completely.  This was a must game for Cleveland, a loss would
     have left them facing Seattle with a well-rested Johnson on Wednesday,
     if needed, and a 4-3 series loss.  Their defense was poor last night
     (although I agree Vizquel was not pulled off the bag), but Assenmacher
     did the job.  In fact, the seventh inning of game 5 will turn out to be
     the most important inning of the series.  I expected a fly ball by
     Griffey to get the run in, but he chased a bad ball for strike three.
     
     Neither side is hitting in the clutch in this series.  Cleveland is 1 for
     13 in this series with the bases loaded.  Seattle isn't driving in runners
     in scoring position, either.  Both bullpens are pitching well in the
     clutch situations, not surprising for Cleveland, but a little surprising
     Seattle is doing such a fine job.  Eric Plunk is the only guy I would
     look at in either bullpen as not performing as he should in this series.
63.1455MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 16 1995 12:4915
>  Martinez, why didn't he pitch?
>
>  George

   It was a must game for Cleveland, and Hershiser seems to be much more
   of a sure victory at this point than Martinez.  Bosio-Martinez could be a
   Seattle victory (especially the way it went last night), then Hershiser
   would be wasted in Tuesday's loss to Randy Johnson.  I'm sure Cleveland was
   thinking, if we can get a split of the next two, we'll take our chances in
   game 7 against Wolcott or Belcher.  They know they probably won't beat the
   Big Unit, no matter who pitches, so why not do all they can to win game 5 ?

   Good strategy by Hargrove, in my opinion.  OTOH, why they let Plunk pitch
   to Sojo last night is beyond me.  A bit of luck by the Indians let Hargrove
   get by with that mistake.
63.1456CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Oct 16 1995 12:549
    
    Why didn't they atleast try to pitch to Martinez on friday? I mean
    the minute they walked him I knew it was over. You had figure Buher
    was angry over the misplay not to mention he almost took off Mesa
    head in the 9th. Also if lefties can't hit lefties why isn't righties
    can't hit righties? I've never figured this one out. You're either a
    hitter or you're not.............
    
    mike 
63.1457MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 16 1995 13:024
	I'm not sure I remember this inning correctly, but didn't they
	pitch to Martinez until they got to a 3-ball count, then (with
	first base opne) they walked him ?  Maybe I'm thinking about a
	different inning.
63.1458ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 16 1995 13:0715
63.1459CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Oct 16 1995 13:155
    
     Yeah Rich, that was the situation it's was 3-1 to Martinez with 1st
     open and they just gave it to him. I realize the prevailing wisdom is
     to set up the double play but emotions do come into play also. I'd
     have tried to get Martinez and then walked Buhner........ 
63.1460MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 16 1995 13:158
	Regarding Randy Johnson:

	Seattle is 30-3 in games he has started this year, 1-0 in games
	he has relieved.

	Against left-handers, he is almost invincible:  Left-handed hitters
	have hit only .188 against him since 1988.  No left-hander has hit a
	home run off Johnson since 1992.  
63.1461CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Oct 16 1995 13:205
    
     but why is that? I'm left-handed I can't remeber having any more
     problems hitting or k'ing aginst lefties than I did righties...
     
     mike
63.1462MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 16 1995 13:212
	One other statistic:  Hershiser's victory in game 2 gave the Indians
	a 7-20 record in their last 27 games in Seattle (about 4 years).
63.1463SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 16 1995 13:3024
RE            <<< Note 63.1461 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Washing Machine" >>>

>     but why is that? I'm left-handed I can't remeber having any more
>     problems hitting or k'ing aginst lefties than I did righties...
     
  Maybe this is because you only made it to AAA and didn't make the majors.

  In general the difference between a AAA pitcher and a decent big league
pitcher is that a big league pitcher can throw the curve for a strike pretty
much when ever needed. The AAA pitcher can't depend on throwing breaking stuff
for a strike and has to rely on the fast ball once they get behind in the count.

  That's why Mo struggled so much his 1st full season. In the minors if he got
behind they had to throw him a fast ball but once the big league pitchers
figured out he couldn't hit the breaking stuff that's all he saw. Once he
learned to at least fight off the curve he developed into a 1st class power
hitter. 

  Since the curve breaks away from a hitter hitting from the same side as the
pitcher it's that much harder for the batter to hit. Hence the edge. Curves
that break down and in are not as much trouble because the batter can reach
them easily and foul them off.

  George
63.1464USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Oct 16 1995 13:4515
Cleveland better win this thing.  Hey Groaner and Joe, I thought the Yanks
had Seattle "in the bag" by only having to win one of the last 3... :^(

At least there's no way you'll see Johnson in both games.

I think Hargrove has made some bad decisions in this series.  Plunk has
ALWAYS been a pitcher who CANNOT pitch under pressure.  Hargrove did his
lefty-righty relief substitution until he put himself in a position of
having to pitch Plunk with the game on the line in both Games 3 & 5.
He lucked-out last night.

And Groaner, can you explain why Vizquel is trying to BUNT in the 8th
in Game 3 with the winning run on 2B ????????????????  Since LL most
hitters are drilled with the thought -> "bring him in !....don't leave
it up to the next guy !!".   Very weak.
63.1465OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Oct 16 1995 14:294
63.1466MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Oct 16 1995 16:357
    
      Forget about the pitching rotations, the real question is
     will Albert Belle fake another injury for game 6 thereby
     ensuring the Indians another easy victory like game 4 or 
     will he embarass himself again both in the field and at the  
     plate and make a close game of it like he did in game 5?
    
63.1467ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Oct 17 1995 11:308
    
    Will Johnson have enough left to do what it takes tonight?
    
    I don't think so, though I was wrong about that on Friday...
    
    I still believe the Tribe will win tonight...
    
    Joe
63.1468bank on itROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 17 1995 11:573
63.1469SNAX::ERICKSONAnybody but Cleveland...Tue Oct 17 1995 12:3714
    
    	I think the series is going 7 games. Randy Johnson is 31-5 since
    May 1994. Seattle is 30-3 this year when Johnson starts. The odds are
    with Johnson and Seattle. Randy has learned how to pitch. Even if
    he is tired and can't throw a 96MPH heater by somebody. He still finds
    a way to get them out.
    	On the other side of the fence. The Indians starting pitching
    has been tremendous the entire playoffs. All of there starters have
    gone into the 7th inning. Plus, have only allowed 6 earned runs in 
    the 5 games. With only 27 hits in 35.1 innings pitched.
    	All in all should be a great game tonight. With Seattle winning
    the game 3-2.
    
    Ron
63.1470SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Oct 17 1995 12:545
  I wonder what happens to "Mr. Snappy" when Randy Johnson gets tired?

  I wonder if the Indians really want to know?

  George
63.1471ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Oct 17 1995 13:133
    
    Actually, if Johnson's tired, I'd be just as scarred of Mr. Snappy
    in the dugout as at the plate...
63.1473ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Oct 17 1995 14:132
    
    A fastball Johnson throws from the back of his hand...
63.1474MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Oct 17 1995 14:168
    
   >> Who is Mr. Snappy?
      
      It's from a commercial, Karen. Johnson shows a number
      of contrived grips and then they cut to a piece of game 
      footage and show the effect. Mr Snappy is supposedly thrown 
      with the ball resting on the back of the hand. The effect 
      is that he hits batters with it.
63.1475normally enough for johnson, but not nowROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 17 1995 15:434
63.1476SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Oct 17 1995 15:4814
  Depends on whether the Twin Martinez wake up or not. If Edgar starts hitting
the way he did on that last swing in game 5 the Indians could be in trouble. 

  Of course the odds are with the Indians. They are the better team and they
are up by a game but being better in baseball means having a .550 to .600
chance of winning which is not all that great. And with Mr Snappy on the mound
it's more like 50-50. 

  Everyone keeps predicting a continuation of the pitcher duels that have been
common for both championship series but you never know. If it ends up a
slugfest that wouldn't be the 1st time a predicted pitchers duel went by the
boards. 

  George 
63.1477SNAX::ERICKSONAnybody but Cleveland...Tue Oct 17 1995 17:048
    
    	An interesting stat that Costas brought up the other night. The
    Indians had a .694 winning percentage during the regular season. While
    the Mariners had a .545 winning percentage during the regular season.
    In the history of MLB. No teams with that big a discrepency. Have ever
    faced each other during the post season.
    
    Ron
63.1478USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Oct 17 1995 19:361
How many teams have ever finished with something close to a .694 winning % ?
63.1479not manyAKOCOA::BREENTue Oct 17 1995 20:286
    Well 107 wins is the 154 game equivelant and there you have the Chicago
    team with 116,'54 indians with 111, and maybe '27 yanks, 29-32 A's
    
    Not many.  '61 yanks had 110 in a 162 game season (.6%%?)
    
    
63.1480ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 18 1995 01:493
63.1481ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Oct 18 1995 03:0533
    
    Wow.
    
    Some thoughts:
    
    1) Seattle played an excellent series.  They have nothing to
       be ashamed of.
    
    2) Pinella should have pulled Johnson earlier.  It was clear to
       _me_ he was through.
    
    3) Johnson gave a _great_ effort.  His performance from the
       Seattle/California playoff game through tonight was
       exempliary.
    
    4) I don't for the life of me know how to react to the victory
       tonight.  In all my life as a Cleveland sports fan, I've
       never seen a team achieve this level of success, and have
       developed a feeling of dread, as I _know_ something's
       going to go wrong whenever my team comes close.  This time
       it didn't happen, and I'm still not sure I believe it.  It's
       going to take a while for this to sink in.
    
    5) I'll be _amazed_ if Wilson recovers from this.  He's never
       been anything resembling a great player, and this year
       represents his peak.  I guess amazed is a bit strong, but
       surprised fits...
    
    6) There is no #6.
    
    7) Go Tribe! 1-0 in World Series vs. the Braves... B^)
    
    Joe
63.1482IMBETR::DUPREZCleveland Indians are king, Eddie Murray is gawd...Wed Oct 18 1995 11:046
Well, I'll definitely be rooting for the Tribe vs the Bills - I mean, Braves...

I spent a lot of last night taking care of my kids - what happened?  I got to
watch about 5 minutes in the 3rd inning.  Johnson looked pretty good, but he
was relying on his breaking ball a lot more than usual...
63.1483PCBUOA::MORGANWed Oct 18 1995 11:1325
    Roland,
    
    Sometime around the 5th inning, there was a ground ball hit to Joey
    Cora, who after making a nice play on the previous batter,
    unnecessarily gunned a throw to first with Johnson covering and it got 
    by him (another play I felt Wilson the catcher screwed up on), allowing 
    the batter to reach second.  Kenny Lofton drove him in with a single to 
    left.  Later this inning, Coleman led off with a single, stole 2nd and 
    Cora popped up a sacrifice bunt attempt.  Griffey flied out to the 
    warning track which would have brought in a run had Cora gotten the bunt 
    down.
    
    In the 8th Pena led off with a double to right center. Lofton dropped a
    nice bunt and stole 2nd. Still nobody out.  Johnson threw a fastball
    about 6 inches high and outside the strike zone and it got by Wilson. 
    The ball rolled to the Indians dugout scoring the guy on 3rd.  As Wilson 
    and Johnson nonchalantly played the passed ball, Lofton rounded 3rd and
    also scored easily.  Carlos Baerga (a guy that I've definitely grown to
    admire this series) followed that up with a homer to center.  4 to zip
    just like that.  Seattle couldn't do anything and that's the way the
    game ended.
    
    Excellent performance by Cleveland and Seattle's well finally dried up.
    
    					Steve
63.1484ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Oct 18 1995 11:3124
    
    More thoughts...
    
    1) I've still got butterflies.  In my lifetime, the only time time
       I've rooted for _my_ team in a championship series is the
       1994 Crunch, and they were never _my_ team to the extent that
       the Tribe, Browns, Cavs, or even Force were...
    
    2) I can't wait to see the Tribe pitchers hit.
    
    3) I hope Seattle fans get to keep their team.
    
    4) The most dramatic shot after the game had to be Cora, crying
       in the dugout, and Alex Rodriguez comforting him.  One couldn't
       help but feel bad for Cora - he gave the series everything he
       had.
    
    5) I still don't understand why Pinella (who, IMHO, is _not_ good
       at at least one important piece of managing - player development)
       didn't use Rodriguez more.  This was true all season; just when
       I thought Pinella had woken up and given Rodriguez the job,
       Sojo or Fermin or whoever was back at SS.
    
    Joe
63.1485Now beat those NL bumsCSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Wed Oct 18 1995 11:349
    To Paul G and Joe H congrats on your team making it to the World
    Series. They were the dominant team in the AL this year and earned the
    crown. This might be the first WS since 1986 that I'll watch. And for
    all of the people who say Small markets cann't compete today with the
    New York's,LA and Chicago markets I give you 2 prime reasons on how to
    build a baseball organization in "Small Markets" The Braves and the
    Indians. America's first Politically Incorrect World Series.
    
    Mike
63.1486ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Oct 18 1995 11:4411
    
>    The Braves and the
>    Indians. America's first Politically Incorrect World Series.
    
    You mean Bill Maher is announcing?  Cool - a big improvement over
    Mussburger & Uecker...
    
    Joe
    
    P.S. Wouldn't the '48 series have been retrospectively politcally
         incorrect?
63.1487IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Wed Oct 18 1995 11:465
>    P.S. Wouldn't the '48 series have been retrospectively politcally
>         incorrect?

Well, so would the concept of Manifest Destiny, but who's really keeping
track?
63.1488ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 18 1995 12:084
63.1489CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Oct 18 1995 12:135
    
    While Orel was a decent choice, I can't help but feel that Kenny Lofton
    got screwed out of the MVP. He was fantastic the whole series. 
    
    mike
63.1490USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Oct 18 1995 12:1612
I'm glad to see Seattle gone.  Johnson couldn't pitch every game and
that's the only way they could advance.  He was pitching curveballs
'cause his arm was shot.  There were plenty of Cleveland hitters
pulling his pitches last night.  He should be glad they're done
'cause Lou would have blown his arm had they gone to the WS.

I'm also glad we don't have to watch Dome_Ball anymore.  Sorry Spud,
but it just ain't my cup-of-tea.  No astroturf, or stupid "speaker"
rules, or measuring indoor decibel levels.  It's bad enough we'll
have to watch that chop-chop crap.

I hope Cleveland wins, but my head says Atlanta in 5 or 6.
63.1491Wahoo...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 18 1995 12:2836
    Congrats to the Tribe.  I'll be rooting for the Indians all the 
    way now, not because they're the AL rep but because I can't stand
    the Braves.  When much of the country fell in for the Braves due
    to TBS, I went for the anti-Ted.
    
>    4) The most dramatic shot after the game had to be Cora, crying
>       in the dugout, and Alex Rodriguez comforting him.  One couldn't
>       help but feel bad for Cora - he gave the series everything he
>       had.
    
    Cora's one of my favorite players in baseball.  The little-guy
    thing taken to the extreme.  Too bad that the decisive game was
    a rough one for him...
    
>    5) I still don't understand why Pinella (who, IMHO, is _not_ good
>       at at least one important piece of managing - player development)
>       didn't use Rodriguez more.  This was true all season; just when
>       I thought Pinella had woken up and given Rodriguez the job,
>       Sojo or Fermin or whoever was back at SS.
    
    Good point.  Piniella doesn't trust youth, period.  But I'd been 
    repeating it all series long-- Luis Sojo is not a SS.  He has no
    range, trouble in the pivot and isn't a good enough hitter to 
    justify being there.  There were two plays just in last night's
    game that Sojo made the valiant dives for but any self-respecting
    SS would have gobbled up.
    
    Billte's (and mine) other pet peeve: what's with the barehand crap
    from Omar Vizquel?  He's now making the ordinary play with the
    barehand.  I guess now that they're off the artificial stuff it'll
    stop, but if doesn't eventually he _will_ be burned.
    
    
    glenn
    
63.1492SNAX::ERICKSONAnybody but Cleveland...Wed Oct 18 1995 12:4412
    
    	What a great series. Congradulations to the Indians. The
    Mariners scored 6 earned runs in 6 games, enough said. Good
    pitching will beat good hitting 90% of the time.
    	On to Atlanta for the World Series. Both teams will be rested.
    Watch out for Hershisher he is on a roll. Also remember he was the
    best hitting pitcher in the NL. If Clevland keeps pitching the
    way they are. Atlanta won't have a chance to beat them. Atlanta is
    one of the worst hitting teams in the league. Should be a couple
    2-1, 3-2 ball games.
    
    Ron
63.1493PCBUOA::MORGANWed Oct 18 1995 12:5010
    Agreed on the Vizquel barehand move, Glenn.  I recall once all series
    where it was probably necessary, but for him to continue doing it is
    only going to result in a ball spinning out of his hand eventually.
    
    I also thought Lofton should have been the MVP.
    
    One last request for TBN.  Please keep the camera shots of Mike
    "Blinky" Hargrove and Bob "Scratchy" Cox to a minimum!
    
    					Steve
63.1494AKOCOA::BREENWed Oct 18 1995 12:599
    I go with the Lofton for mvp
    
    Also agree, Johnson should have been pulled after Pena's double - why
    do these managers freeze like that (Gaston with Stewart in '93)
    
    Wilson made one nice play - I suppose noone could hear anything
    
    Probably only around Boston would anyone think of this series as a
    rematch - '48 series was very close with pitching duels the rule.
63.1495MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 18 1995 13:1198
	Congrats to the Indians faithful, it's been a long time.

	I disagree with Joe Huber on one thing:  Seattle did not play
	a good series at all.  Their defense was below average, their
	hitters went 3-for-39 with runners in scoring position, and they
	didn't play good fundamental baseball - look at all the opportunities
	waisted because they failed to advance runners.  Nor was Cleveland
	playing that well either; they often failed in clutch situations
	at the plate (1-for-12 with bases loaded, entering last night's
	game), with the defense (save for Lofton and Vizquel) really looking
	rather dull as well.  All in all, this was a rather sloppy, though
	entertaining (because of its closeness), series.  Cleveland had the
	huge edge in pitching entering the series, and when all was said and
	done, it was the Indians' great pitching, rather than the supposed
	dominant offensive machinery (which didn't do that well against a
	rather mediocre Seattle pitching staff), that won the series.

	If it was any other team in the National League, I'd pick the Indians
	to win due to that great pitching staff.  Unfortunately for them,
	they are going to meet MLB's best pitching staff, and I'm going to
	go for the Braves (big surprise, considering where I've been living).

	OTOH, while the Braves pitchers turned in outstanding performances in
	the playoffs, the team showed some distinct weaknesses that the
	Indians could capitalize on:

	(1)  While the Braves held the Reds scoring down, their pitchers were
	constantly under pressure, because almost all the Reds have enough
	speed to cause havoc, and the Braves were not generating much offense at
	all.  For the Braves to win, they are going to have to score at least
	3 runs a game off the Indians.  It might be easier against the Indians
	right-handed staff, rather than the left-handers the Reds threw, but
	it might not.  You can't count on game-winning home runs from O'Brien
	and Deveraux very often; but, the Braves big guns will be facing a
	group of right-handed starters this time, and the Jones-McGriff-Justice-
	Klesko power numbers are A LOT higher vs right handers than lefties.

	(2)  The Braves pitchers were in trouble a lot, but pitched out of it.
	The Braves two best starters, Maddux and Glavine, are great not because
	they have overpowering stuff, but because they know the N.L. hitters
	and their weaknesses as well as anyone in the league, and they have the
	greatness to hit the exact spots when needed.  This implies two things:
	a) they better have extremely accurate scouting reports; and b) they
	had better adjust when the A.L. umpires are at home plate.  The Reds,
	though they were 2nd in the NL in scoring this year, don't have the
	power that Cleveland will bring to the park, and any mistakes by the
	Braves' staff could be hit pretty hard.  Moreover, if they can't adjust
	to an AL umpire's strike zone, they could have problems; particularly
	Smoltz, who flusters fairly easily (IMO).

	(3)  Save for Marquis Grissom, this group of Braves is slow.  They rely
	way to much on the HR to score.  I would expect this to give advantage
	to Orel Hershiser, particularly.  Moreover, Dennis Martinez has had
	(in the past) some of his best games against the Braves; the Braves
	nemesis in recent years has been Montreal, and Martinez was a key
	reason why.

	Then why would the Braves have a chance ?

	(1)  The Braves pitchers, as a group, are superior to any Cleveland
	has faced all year.  No other team in the AL has a threesome like
	Maddux-Glavine-Smoltz, and Avery's six-inning two-hitter in game 4
	vs the Reds was typical of his pitching down the stretch (he couldn't
	buy a win in July or August, but finished up strong).  While the
	Indians faced relatively weak staffs in Boston and Seattle during the
	post-season, they meet the only club in baseball with better starters
	than theirs, and a team with a bullpen as good as theirs, with W.S.
	experience to boot.  How many times did Cleveland meet a closer who
	usually throws in the 97-100 mph range (Wohlers), a set-up man who
	allows a .134 average when runners are in scoring position (McMichael),
	another set-up man who throws in the 93-95 mph range (Pena), with a
	veteran lefty (Mercker) in the bullpen?  (Avery will pitch from there as
	well, though he is MUCH more effective as a starter.) 

	(2)  The Braves have a good defense, save for the LF position when
	Klesko plays.  While Boston defense is not very good, and Seattle played
	a rather poor defensive series, the Braves players have rarely made
	fundamental mistakes this year.  McGriff is a good first baseman,
	Lemke and Blauser/Belliard are very good-to-outstanding at the DP,
	Grissom has been a gold glove CF, Justice has improved is thinking in
	the field and has a great arm, and Lopez has one of the best arms
	behind the plate in the NL (Santiago the best in that regard), while
	performing very well at blocking balls in the dirt.  Jones is no more
	than adequate at third, but doesn't botch plays either; only Klesko is
	questionable, largely because of his speed (or lack thereof).  Also,
	Braves pitchers field their positions better than any staff in the NL;
	nor do they walk many nor hit many batters, though none are really
	great at holding runners on at first.  Cleveland hitters are going
	to have to earn any runs they get against a group of pitchers very
	tough to hit.

	(3)  The Braves have experience, and HFA.  These two advantages could
	play a factor in this series.

	(4)  While Bobby Cox can be questioned regarding his strategy, I can't
	see much talent at all in Mike Hargrove's managing ability.  In this
	battle of negatives (from my perspective), the Braves get away with
	having the "less worse" manager leading the team.
63.1496This is a hell of a matchup...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 18 1995 13:2117
    While I'm rooting for the Indians, I think the Braves are going to
    win.  I think it's time for Greg Maddux to rise to the fore in the
    postseason.  The Indians' "great" pitching is not really great:
    Dennis Martinez, Orel Hershiser, Chris Nagy are pitching well, but
    they are hittable and beatable.  There's only one _great_ pitcher
    in this series: Maddux.  It says here that he'll put his postseason
    problems behind him and be the difference.
    
    Obviously, the Indians' bats have to heat up.  They've been quiet 
    even by postseason (re: good pitching) standards.  They didn't hit
    the Red Sox (they walked them in the Wakefield start), much less
    the Mariners.  And now they're going to be looking at pitching 
    that's on another plane...
    
    glenn
     
63.1497MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 18 1995 13:4228
>    postseason.  The Indians' "great" pitching is not really great:
>    Dennis Martinez, Orel Hershiser, Chris Nagy are pitching well, but
>    they are hittable and beatable.  There's only one _great_ pitcher
>    in this series: Maddux.  It says here that he'll put his postseason
>    problems behind him and be the difference.

     Frankly, I can't agree.  The Indians starters may not be great in
     comparison to the Orioles startes of the early 1970's, and they don't
     have a Koufax-Drysdale combo that will just shut you down (although
     DD wasn't that great in the big games), but they pitch well, under control,
     and you have to be patient and be willing to go the other way A LOT in
     order to be effective (especially with Hershiser and Martinez).  This
     seems to me to be CLEARLY the second best group of starters in baseball.
     In addition, their pitching style is perfectly adapted to the Braves
     hitting style, at least from Cleveland's stand-point; the Braves are NOT
     effective at generating runs, they go for the long-ball to win games.
      
     OTOH, I would rate Tom Glavine as a great pitcher.  He has only 1 less
     win than Maddux over the last 5 years, a period in which Maddux has won
     4 Cy Young awards and Glavine 1 (assuming he wins this year).  In past
     seasons he was used in a way such that he was very tired in September and
     October, but not this year; the Braves had a big lead and a much stronger
     bullpen this year than in the past, and Glavine has been very effective
     down the stretch and in the post-season, in fact has outpitched Maddux for
     the last 4 weeks when it has been on the line.  His control is second in
     the NL only to Maddux (as far as exact location of pitches), and he is the
     least likely pitcher in this series to get rattled under pressure.  I look
     as Glavine over Martinez as much more likely than Maddux over Hershiser.
63.1498We'll see; that's what makes this game great...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 18 1995 14:0415
>     Frankly, I can't agree.  The Indians starters may not be great in
>     comparison to the Orioles startes of the early 1970's, and they don't
>     have a Koufax-Drysdale combo that will just shut you down (although
>     DD wasn't that great in the big games), but they pitch well, under control,
>     and you have to be patient and be willing to go the other way A LOT in
>     order to be effective (especially with Hershiser and Martinez).  This
>     seems to me to be CLEARLY the second best group of starters in baseball.
    
    No disagreement.  It's just the use of that word "great" that I've
    qualified.  And I think that both Martinez and Hershiser will get
    roughed up in at least one start each...
    
    glenn
    
63.1499CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Oct 18 1995 14:107
    
    Well after watching the Indians' pitchers control the middle of the
    order of both the Soxs and Mariners, I would think their scouting
    staff is excellent and will again help their pitchers to control
    the Braves' biggest guns and in turn win the series.....
    
    mike
63.1500MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 18 1995 14:1414
>    Well after watching the Indians' pitchers control the middle of the
>    order of both the Soxs and Mariners, I would think their scouting
>    staff is excellent and will again help their pitchers to control
>    the Braves' biggest guns and in turn win the series.....

     You wouldn't have to have quite the same level of scouting to know
     the tendancies of teams you play 12-13 times a year, including in
     the last 6 weeks of the season.

     I do think the Indians' #1 and #2 starters will have good games against
     Atlanta, but that won't necessarily be enough to win, because the Indians
     will hit even less against the Braves than they did against a mediocre
     Seattle pitching staff.
    
63.1501SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 18 1995 14:2218
  I don't agree about Johnson getting pulled.

  First of all, the runs were caused by throwing errors (or at least throwing
mental lapses). Yes Johnson was the one trying to catch the throws and he
hesitated before trying to throw Lofton out but those were not really pitching
problems. I doubt a relief pitcher would have played better defense.

  Second, the Mariners bull pen really stinks. On other occasions Lou stayed
with Walcott and members of the 3 B's (Benes, Bosio, and Belcher) and it worked
out. 

  Johnson got them there and it was Johnson's game to win or lose. As it was
the home run was the only real run he gave up and the reason that was important
was only because Griffey, Martinez, Martinez, and Buhner went 1 for 13. If
they had been hitting the way they had against the Yankees Johnson would have
looked like Al Spalding.

  George
63.1502MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 18 1995 14:2718
>  Johnson got them there and it was Johnson's game to win or lose. As it was
>the home run was the only real run he gave up and the reason that was important
>was only because Griffey, Martinez, Martinez, and Buhner went 1 for 13. If
>they had been hitting the way they had against the Yankees Johnson would have
>looked like Al Spalding.


 Johnson had lost it beginning in the seventh; his pitches didn't have the same
 degree of heat, and he was getting his pitches up.  Pena doubles on a high
 pitch.  Lofton beats out a bunt to third.  Even if Wilson doesn't give up
 the passed ball, Amaro (pinch running) scores on Vizquel's fly to let on a 
 pitch up high, and Baerga's HR on another high pitch scores Lofton as well.

 Randy Johnson pitched a great game, but had run out of gas by the eighth
 inning from overuse (I would guess).  He was ready to be removed in favor of
 Charlton at that point.  Had Seattle been tied or ahead at that point, I
 think we would have seen Charlton in after the Lofton bunt, but I'm not sure
 of that.
63.1503GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Wed Oct 18 1995 14:404
    
    	Another vote for Loftin as MVP......
    
    Claybone
63.1504SNAX::ERICKSONAnybody but Cleveland...Wed Oct 18 1995 14:437
    
    	Randy Johnson was pitching fine. Up until the pass ball. Once
    that happened and Lofton scored from 2nd. Johnson lost his emotion
    and mental edge. If there were no pass ball. I think Johnson pitches
    better to Baerga and there would be no home run.
    
    Ron
63.1505SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 18 1995 15:018
  Yeah, if the Mariners had any kind of set up man no question, the plan would
be to pull Johnson but down one to three runs in the 7th inning how are you
going to win bringing in your closer? 

  As it turned out he could have pitched three perfect innings in the 7th, 8th,
and 9th and they still would have lost.

  George
63.1506CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Oct 18 1995 15:026
    
    So I guess what you're saying Rich, is that the Indians' pitchers and
    Scouts are way way better than the Yankees' cause they couldn't control
    the middle of the Seattle lineup?
    
    mike
63.1507MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 18 1995 18:237
>    So I guess what you're saying Rich, is that the Indians' pitchers and
>    Scouts are way way better than the Yankees' cause they couldn't control
>    the middle of the Seattle lineup?

     I don't think scouts had anything to do with it, but I do think Cleveland's
     pitchers are way, way better than the Yankees (no matter how you want to
     measure it).
63.1508ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 18 1995 19:2328
63.1509IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Wed Oct 18 1995 19:273
>    	Murray ***WIFF***

Murray will only whiff if there aren't runners in scoring position...
63.1510SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 18 1995 19:3921
RE    <<< Note 63.1508 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

>    Greg Maddux who?  First inning game 1 - 
>    
>    	Lofton single
>    	Vizquel walk
>    	Baerga single
>    	Belle BA BOOM - HR
>    	Murray ***WIFF***
>    	Thome BA BOOM - HR
>    	Ramirez BA BOOM - HR
>    	Sorrento double
>    	Alomar single

  That's quite a prediction. 

  One question, is someone here pinch hitting or is one of these guys going to
be listed as the pitcher when the Indians hand their starting roster to the
umpire?

  George
63.1511MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 18 1995 19:5710
>  One question, is someone here pinch hitting or is one of these guys going to
>be listed as the pitcher when the Indians hand their starting roster to the
>umpire?
>
>  George

 Whichever one it is will have to pitch to Grissom, at the least.

 BTW, is anyone else wondering if the Cleveland BA BOOMs are gas noises, and
 if so, what is this WIFF by Murray ?
63.1512SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 18 1995 20:0210
RE                     <<< Note 63.1511 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

> Whichever one it is will have to pitch to Grissom, at the least.

  Well not really. The Indians will be up 1st so I suppose they could hand
the ump a lineup with all hitters designating one of those guys as a pitcher.
Of course in the bottom of the 1st they would have to substitute a real
pitcher unless Eddie Maurry is prepared to take the mound.

  George
63.1513MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 18 1995 20:5510
>  Well not really. The Indians will be up 1st so I suppose they could hand
>the ump a lineup with all hitters designating one of those guys as a pitcher.
>Of course in the bottom of the 1st they would have to substitute a real
>pitcher unless Eddie Maurry is prepared to take the mound.
>
>  George

 But they would have to have the pitcher on the line-up card pitch to at least
 one batter; that's the rule.  So Grissom gets his hacks against Murray, or
 maybe Sorrento.
63.1514SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 19 1995 11:094
  Good point. Yeah, I don't know. But then this is Groner's idea so I suppose
he'll be along to set us straight any time now.

  George
63.1515ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 19 1995 11:152
63.1516SNAX::ERICKSONMay the best team win...Fri Oct 20 1995 15:158
    
    	Just letting Paul no that I am on Vacation next week. Be
    in PA doing a little deer hunting. So I won't have access to a
    terminal. Won't be back until Sunday Oct. 29th. What is the
    schedule for the World Series? Is it Saturday, Sunday, Tuesday,
    Wednesday, Thursday, Saturday, Sunday?
    
    Ron
63.1517SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 20 1995 15:163
  Yes, you'll be back in time for game 7 if needed.

  George
63.1518MIMS::ROLLINS_RFri Oct 20 1995 15:506
>    terminal. Won't be back until Sunday Oct. 29th. What is the
>    schedule for the World Series? Is it Saturday, Sunday, Tuesday,
>    Wednesday, Thursday, Saturday, Sunday?
    
     I think the Braves will only need Saturday, Sunday, Tuesday,
     Wednesday, with a possible Thursday in case of rain.
63.1519ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 20 1995 17:292
63.1520Have to like the Indians in 7AKOCOA::BREENFri Oct 20 1995 17:3213
    Note that the networks are flipp'n the coverage back and forth.
    
    ABC, 1; nbc,nbc;abc,abc;nbc,abc
    
    Looks like a seven gamer.  Don't know if Braves can make the big plays
    in the clutch and avoid the big mistakes.
    
    Justice and McGriff are much better hitters than their average
    dictates.  Indians don't lose as much as some A.L. teams in the past
    when playing in n.l. park as Murray if necessary can still play first.
    
    Lofton-Grissom may be decisive - there's none better than Lofton right
    now.
63.1521SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 20 1995 17:5119
  The Indians shouldn't have that much trouble because of no DH. If they go

  in Atlanta    Hershire, Martinez,                       Martinez, Nagy
  in Cleveland                      Nagy, Hill, Hershire, 

the way they seemed headed in the A.L.C.S. then game 7 will be the only one
where they don't have a pitcher with national league experience on the mound.

  A couple reasons the announcers gave for Martinez pitching games 1 and 6
against Seattle was that being older he needed the extra time to rest and
they were afraid his old body would stiffen up in the cold air in Cleveland.

  If that's true then the same reasoning could work here except that he has
only the 4 days rest between A.L.C.S. game 6 and W.S. game 2.

  Should be an even matchup. This could be a great series unless one of the two
teams gets lucky and runs off a few wins in a row. 

  George
63.1522ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Oct 20 1995 19:1917
    
    As anyone who (for reasons unknown) went through my POOL picks,
    or my often notoriously bad postseason picks, knows, I never pick
    against my team, even if I don't think they're going to win.
    
    Therefore, it shouldn't surprise anyone (or at least the anyone
    silly enough to analyze my picks) that I predict the Tribe will
    win it all.
    
    However, at least on this ocassion, I really mean it.  I honestly
    believe that Cleveland _will_ win, in (give or take a game) five
    games.
    
    And I'm 100% certain I'm going to enjoy this Series, like no other 
    I've seen before.
    
    Joe
63.1523SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 20 1995 20:0114
  The one thing that makes me thing the Indians might struggle a bit is the
trouble they had hitting against the Red Sox and Mariners. Neither has what
you would call a great pitching staff but the Indians really didn't have many
8 or 9 run games.

  The Braves, by contrast, can pitch and in spite of the fact that Hershiser
and Martinez come from the NL, they will have one less hitter in the lineup. 

  The Indians will have to hit better than they did during the playoffs to win
but then those guys are capable of cranking it up. 

  I really believe the Braves have the edge but not by much. 

  George 
63.1524ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Oct 20 1995 20:1937
    
>  The Braves, by contrast, can pitch and in spite of the fact that Hershiser
>and Martinez come from the NL, they will have one less hitter in the lineup. 
    
    Yes, they can pitch, but the Tribe has a _far_ superior offense;
    subtract 1/9 of Cleveland's offense, and they still (taking park
    effects into account) put up 125 more runs.
    
    Using equivalent averages, which normalize to a neutral park...
    
    Belle - .350
    Thome - .337
    Klesko - .325
    Ramirez - .322
    Murray - .310
    Lofton - .295
    Sorrento - .287
    Baerga - .286
    Justice - .285
    Lopez - .285
    McGriff - .284
    Alomar - .279
    Jones - .275
    Vizquel - .252
    O'Brien - .246
    Grissom - .245
    Lemke - .237
    Blauser - .222
    
    Even _if_ we assume Atlanta's pitching to be far superior (IMHO, a
    clearly wrong assumption), there's a _lot_ of difference to be
    made up...
    
    Of course, in a short series, anything can happen.  But I'm
    certain the Tribe has a better chance than the Braves...
    
    Joe
63.1525ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Oct 22 1995 14:105
63.1526ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 23 1995 10:175
63.1527ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 23 1995 10:172
63.1528STAR::ALLISONMon Oct 23 1995 10:365
    Keep the faith, Groaner... 
    
    Heard a comment last night.. Ever since the Sox had Belle's bat sawn in
    half, he's hit something like .200... At least the Sox did something
    positive in that series.. ;)
63.1529tribe will win!ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 23 1995 10:502
63.1530MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 23 1995 11:4419
>    Heard a comment last night.. Ever since the Sox had Belle's bat sawn in
>    half, he's hit something like .200... At least the Sox did something
>    positive in that series.. ;)


     I heard an interesting comment over the weekend as well.  It appears that
     of Belle's 50 HR's, only 12 came in the first few months of the season,
     while the Tribe was building a 17.5 game lead.  31 came in August and
     September, after Cleveland had basically clinched the division title.

     Then they pointed out how many chances Belle has had in the post-season
     to come through in the crunch, and except for the game-tying HR against
     Boston in game 1, Belle has failed rather miserably in post-season RBI
     situations.  [Case in point was last night, with the foul pop to Lopez
     with a runner on third late in the game.]

     There was some speculation as to whether Belle performs less well when
     the pressure is on.  While it may not be true, statistics seem to bear
     out that he hits better when there is no pressure.
63.1531ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Oct 23 1995 12:2215
    
>     There was some speculation as to whether Belle performs less well when
>     the pressure is on.  While it may not be true, statistics seem to bear
>     out that he hits better when there is no pressure.
    
    It depends upon how much context you take, though - while Belle
    _wasn't_ hitting many HR early in the season, he was hitting a _ton_
    of doubles, and was helping the team.  He also was a very good 
    "clutch" hitter in 1994, when the Tribe was truly in a race.  I
    don't see any concrete evidence over any significant period of
    time that Belle is not a "clutch" player.
    
    He certainly hasn't been up to par in the postseason, though...
    
    Joe
63.1532MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 23 1995 12:3111
>    It depends upon how much context you take, though - while Belle
>    _wasn't_ hitting many HR early in the season, he was hitting a _ton_
>    of doubles, and was helping the team.  He also was a very good 
>    "clutch" hitter in 1994, when the Tribe was truly in a race.  I
>    don't see any concrete evidence over any significant period of
>    time that Belle is not a "clutch" player.


     Well, actually neither what I saw or what you state is evidence that he
     is or isn't.  Certainly he could end up wearing a Ron Gant-type label
     if he continues to fail to come through.
63.1533SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 23 1995 13:0130
  The Indians have now lost 6 World Series games in a row. Anyone know if they
are coming up on a record? 

  Must win for Nagy Tuesday. No World Series team has ever come back from down
3 zip and the Indians will have to beat John Smoltz, the Braves best post
season pitcher, to avoid falling into that hole. 

  Teams have come back recently from being down two zip. This is the list
as I remember it:

  As I recall the Yankees came back in '78 and took 4 straight after dropping
the 1st two games to the Dodgers. That was the Series in which Greg Nettels
turned those spectacular game saving plays at 3rd and Reggie hit 3 dingers
in one game. Garvey was in a slump throughout the series.

  In '81 (the other big strike year) Garvey was pounding the ball and the
Dodgers returned the favor coming back to take 4 straight after dropping the
1st two in Yankee Stadium. 

  Then of course there was '86 when the Red Sox blew their 2-zip lead over the
Mets.

  In '87 and '91 the Twins blew 2 games to zip leads to go down 2 games to 3
against the Cardinals and Braves but came back to take both series in 7. 

  By contrast, teams losing the 3rd game to go down 3 zip have not fared as
well. Not only has no team won from that position in World History, it seems
that they almost never avoid the sweep once in that hole.

  George 
63.1534Sorry Groan... WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityMon Oct 23 1995 13:034
    
    
    
        Stick a fork in em. They are done!!
63.1535WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityMon Oct 23 1995 13:044
    
    
        Last team to blow a 2-0 lead in the WS. 1986 Red Sox. Maybe there
    is hope for the tribe.
63.1536ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 23 1995 14:084
63.1537SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 23 1995 14:194
  If Avery pitches Game 4 Maddux will be pitching Game 5 on 4 days rest. In
either case, if they continue to alternate it will be a NL ump.

  George
63.1538MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Oct 23 1995 14:205
>    Tribe will even the series at 2-2.  Game 5 will be pivotal.  Will the
>    home plate umpire be AL or NL for that game?

     Will be an NL ump in game 5.  But, if Cleveland wins game 3 (certainly
     not a certainty), it might very well be Maddux vs Hill in game 4.
63.1539Cleveland needs to get back to fundamentals, and fastEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 23 1995 14:2118
    Omar Vizquel... none better defensively, until the 1995 World Series...
    
    Orel Hershiser... never lost a postseason game, until the 1995 WS... 
    
    Albert Belle... no better power/average combination hitter, until 
       the 1995 WS...
    
    Dennis Martinez... all the advantages of savvy and experience, until
       the 1995 WS...
    
    Manny Ramirez... all the advantages of talented, enthusiastic youth, 
       until the 1995 WS...
    
    
    
    glenn
    
63.1540ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 23 1995 14:512
63.1541Sorry PaulWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityMon Oct 23 1995 14:553
    
    
       Don't believe that was a World Series.
63.1542SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 23 1995 15:1619
  Sure, teams come back from being down 2 zip all the time and the Indians are
certainly capable of doing it if they start playing like the Indians that won
the American League Central during the regular season.

  Problem is the Indian hitters have gone cold. Several announcers have pointed
out, and rightly so, that it was the Indian pitching that beat the Red Sox and
the Mariners. Not only are the Indians not hitting, now they are up against the
best starting rotation in baseball. 

  Which brings up another point. I don't remember much about the Reds Dodgers
series, but since the BoSox were eliminated I don't think there has been a
single blow out. The pitching in general has pretty much kept the hitting
in general under control for most of this post season. True you expect low
scoring games against playoff quality pitching staffs but you'd think there
would be a slugfest once in a while.

  We've been seeing some pretty amazing pitching from all these teams.

  George
63.1543Overhead cam shots agree...umps are blind!BRAT::LEARYCardassians,Klingons and Dominion,OH MY!Tue Oct 24 1995 12:5415
        RE: .1536
        Who cares which league the plate umpire is from!  Somebody
        feewing that the Twibe isn't getting the corner calls?
    
        Blaming the umpiring...sounds like you're resorting to 
        hypocritical thinking once again Groanie.  
        
        Hello kettle?!  This is Paul.  You're black.
        
        Confused?  See notes regarding Roger Clemens getting squeezed for
        a little enlightenment.
        
        Let's see some scoring tonight!  
    
    	ML
63.1544CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Oct 24 1995 13:1614
> <<< Note 63.1543 by BRAT::LEARY "Cardassians,Klingons and Dominion,OH MY!" >>>
>
>    	ML


I took a look at the name, and then at the initials, and thought for half a
second....

Then I realized I didn't see a note crowing in the Notre Dame topic, and
thought,  nope, it can't be.....


'Saw

63.1545ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 24 1995 14:575
63.1546NQOS01::16.135.176.142::may_brBRUCE MAYTue Oct 24 1995 15:145
You've gotten burned on it enough in the past, that you haven't come right 
out and said it, but you have certainly been setting it up.  It took a 
newcomer to fall for the trap, that everyone else easily avoided.

brews
63.1547SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Oct 24 1995 15:2412
  Funny, when I looked at that note I felt there was some implication about
the umpiring as well but perhaps not. Let's give Groner the benefit of the
doubt and say:

>RE    <<< Note 63.1536 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
>    
>    Tribe will even the series at 2-2.  Game 5 will be pivotal.  Will the
>    home plate umpire be AL or NL for that game?

  If they alternate, NL, if they go by home park AL, but why do you ask?

  George
63.1548ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 24 1995 16:533
63.1549ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 24 1995 16:533
63.1550SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Oct 24 1995 17:2212
RE    <<< Note 63.1548 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

>    "Will the home plate umpire be AL or NL for that game" really means
>    the umps are to blame?

  I don't know. I'm not making any claim at all as to what it means.

  All I said is "why do you ask"? Just curious that's all. Do you have any
insight as to what that would mean if it were NL v. AL? And why did you ask
about game 5 as opposed to game 3 or 4?

  George 
63.1551if you don't believe look it upAD::HEATHTribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sportsTue Oct 24 1995 17:5210
    
    
    
    Paul...
    
       Don't touch that.  We can get an expert in here and dust for prints
    and maybe get some DNA.  Writing "Sox sucks" is still punishable by
    being burned at the stake in this state.
    
    Jerry
63.1552ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 24 1995 18:0313
63.1553CSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Tue Oct 24 1995 18:168
     >>NOT WANT YOU TO RUSH TO JUDGEMENT BUT...clearly the glove indicates it
     >>   was either Ron or Karen!"
    
     >> Yes ladies and gentlemen, the perpetrator dropped one of his gloves.
                                                                 ---
        
    Now I'm no F. lee  but I think we have a winner
    
63.1554ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 24 1995 18:262
63.1555IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Oct 24 1995 18:452
Is it true that the culprit was seen cruising slowly in a Geo Tracker?
63.1556MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Oct 24 1995 19:077
	Yunz'll never guess who asked me to post this....

	"Has anyone ever seen Albert Bell and Barry Bonds at the 
	same time?"


	billl
63.1557IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Tue Oct 24 1995 19:126
>	Yunz'll never guess who asked me to post this....
>
>	"Has anyone ever seen Albert Bell and Barry Bonds at the 
>	same time?"

Was it Fabio?
63.1558MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Oct 24 1995 19:209
>Was it Fabio?

	nope, but I'll give you a hint....

	=bob= has his baseball card.



	billl
63.1559NooooooWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCleveland Indians a great team from a great cityTue Oct 24 1995 19:213
    
    
       Dick Raditz???
63.1560MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Oct 24 1995 19:234
	re .1559


	WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!
63.1561ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 25 1995 03:455
63.1563ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 25 1995 10:312
63.1564Is it definitely Avery vs. Hill tonight?PCBUOA::MORGANWed Oct 25 1995 10:5522
    Excellent game to say the least.  Do the Braves miss Jeff Blauser or
    what?  His being out has left a massive hole in the Braves lineup.
    I also wonder what Javy Lopez had in mind when Wohlers shook him off
    from going out to talk to him before Alomar's at-bat in the 9th.
    
    Smolz sucked.  Alejandro Pena sucked.  Nagy pitched well until he tired.  
    Lofton is once again the Cleveland MVP.
    
    "Good aggressive baserunning" got Grissom picked off second/third for the
    3rd out in the 6th inning or so.  A good throw by Grissom could very
    well have cut down that run at the plate in the 11th as well.  This guy
    is supposed to be one of the top center fielders in the game?  He
    almost screwed himself into the ground on another medium-deep fly to
    left center that I don't remember who hit.  He eventually caught it but
    looked lost in doing so.
      
    Lemke came about 2 feet from winning the game with a line shot off Mesa 
    in the 9th.
    
    For the most part, I'd say Cleveland deserved that win.
    
    					Steve
63.1565IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Wed Oct 25 1995 11:483
>    Do deer kill people?

Yeah, if they don't look out while they're driving...
63.1566MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 25 1995 13:1572
>    3rd out in the 6th inning or so.  A good throw by Grissom could very
>    well have cut down that run at the plate in the 11th as well.  This guy
>    is supposed to be one of the top center fielders in the game?  

     The problem with Grissom's plays in the 11th had nothing to do with
     Grissom himself (IMO) but with his positioning.  Look at the replay and
     you will notice that on both Baerga's double and Murray's single, he was
     positioned well to the left side of center field, and the expectation
     was that Pena should be pitching away to induce fly balls into those
     areas.  The pitch to Baerga was down and over the plate, and the pitch
     to Murray was up and in.  Both were pulled.  I daresay that had Murray's
     hit been over the shortstop's head, Grissom would have had Espinosa at
     home; he does have a good arm, and Espinosa doesn't appear to be any
     speedster.  

     From a Braves' fan standpoint:

     The bad from last night:

     Braves lost a game they led 6-5 in the eighth, a game which could have
     just about clinched the Series for them.  It doesn't get any worse than
     that.
     
     Smoltz.  He was terrible from the start, and unfortunately we have him to
     look forward to as the starter in game 7, if the Series goes the distance.
     More than any other pitcher on the Braves staff, he can come unglued.
     Even worse, he was largely responsible for waking up the Cleveland bats
     that had been dormant in this series.

     Pena.  While he wasn't walking people (did intentionally walk Belle),
     his control wasn't sharp.  Neither the 1-2 or 2-2 curves to Baerga were
     close enough to tempt, and his location on the hits by Baerga and Murray
     was bad enough that the Braves were out of position.

     Walks.  After the Braves closed to 4-3, Mercker allowed a leadoff walk
     in the 7th, which runner scored to make it 5-3.  After the Braves took a
     6-5 lead, McMichael walks the leadoff runner in the 8th, and that runner
     scores to tie the game.  Why pitch around guys when no one is on base ?  
     Make them put the ball in play.

     Wohlers had to pitch 2 2/3 innings last night, and probably is not going
     to be available for 1, maybe 2 games.

     The good from last night:

     The Braves bullpen generally did a good job.  Forgetting Pena's terrible
     performance, the rest of the bull pen allowed 2 runs on 4 or 5 hits in
     7 2/3 innings, against arguably the best offensive team in the A.L.  Save
     for two costly walks leading off innings, they could have goose-egged the
     Indians.  The bullpen was a major factor the Braves got back into the
     game.

     Braves continue to perform well offensively in the late innings, and
     don't seem at all fazed by W.S. pressure, nor by the supposedly best
     bullpen in baseball.  Assenmacher was not sharp, Tavarez gave up an
     RBI single out of two batters, and while Mesa was tough in three scoreless
     innings, the Braves got some good swings off him from their left handed
     bats.  Lemke got two hits off him, including one that was two feet from a
     game-winning HR in the ninth.  McGriff got a hit, Polonia hung in tough
     against Mesa's best pitches (eventually earning a walk after being down
     0-2 in the count), and Jones hit a shot that Perry turned into an
     inning ender (I also doubt Sorrento makes that play).  We don't Devereaux
     batting against him, however.  Atlanta bats seem to be doing quite well
     against "baseball's best bullpen."

     Mesa had to work three innings last night to keep Cleveland in the series.
     He certainly won't be available to pitch both of the next two nights.

     Apparently, Bobby Cox has it all over Mike Hargrove in the managing
     department.  I bet Hargrove will cost the Indians this series if he makes
     decisions like the Nagy decision last night.
     
63.1567Cox may make biggest blunder of all with Maddux, thoughEDWIN::WAUGAMANWhat's the story morning glory?Wed Oct 25 1995 14:1032
> Smoltz.  He was terrible from the start, and unfortunately we have him to
> look forward to as the starter in game 7, if the Series goes the distance.
    
    I can't believe that Maddux is not going tonight.  Is there any 
    controversy over this in Atlanta?  Is there some specific rationale
    beyond the "don't mess with success" party line?  Didn't Maddux go
    on 3 in the LDS?  Why not now?
    
>     Pena.  While he wasn't walking people (did intentionally walk Belle),
>     his control wasn't sharp.  Neither the 1-2 or 2-2 curves to Baerga were
>     close enough to tempt, and his location on the hits by Baerga and Murray
>     was bad enough that the Braves were out of position.
    
    Alejandro Pena was horrible in about a half-dozen innings this year
    with the Red Sox, then recently BLAMMED it on "misuse".  From the 
    point I heard that, I figured the guy was still the walking time
    bomb he's most always been.
    
    
    As you more or less said, the Indians still seem to be having problems
    executing _consistently_ (they dodged a huge bullet with that DP to 
    keep it at 6-5 after the Baerga error-- was that the same inning or
    am I confused?) and with Hargrove's handling of pitching (I think some
    of those earlier criticisms like not making the pitchout in Game 1
    were nit-picking, but last night was a disaster).  It was a huge win
    for the Indians, but a game that for a while looked like they were
    determined to give away.  Fortunately, we've still got a Series.
      
    
    glenn
    
63.1568SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 25 1995 14:167
  Cox said he was going to decide about Maddux Monday when Maddux worked.
Maybe they didn't like something they saw.

  Seems Maddux did pitch in 3 days rest against Colorado, but didn't they
get to him at one point for some runs?

  George
63.1569ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 25 1995 14:374
63.1570ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 25 1995 14:386
63.1571I fell asleep in 10thAKOCOA::BREENWed Oct 25 1995 14:5424
    Well I was in favor of Avery pitching game 4 all along and even more so
    since Smoltz was ineffective.  I expect Avery to pitch well and be the
    choice for game 7.  Of course if he does pitch well there probably
    won't be a game 7.  Then again I'm not so sure of Maddox and Glavine at
    the Jake.
    
    Pena had some good outings with the Redsox then some bad and he was
    gone quick, DD was pretty testy early on.  The guy is just inconsistent.
    
    The hit that knocked Nagy out was a routine ground ball that found a
    slit in the right side of the infield (off the bat of the much maligned
    Polonia btw).  I do agree that letting Assenmacher start the inning
    would have been better since he always seems to walk the first batter
    he faces.  Hargrove seemed to be avoiding Devereaux and wanting to
    pitch to Polonia with his righty.
    
    Ironically the arm chair fan when objective often makes better choices
    than the field general who is too into details like "how's his stuff?,
    what was the jugs read on that last fastball...).
    
    Cleveland has to find a way to survive in a low scoring game tonight
    (for 6-7 innings) with the burned out pens deciding the outcome later.
    
    Oh, the dp followed the Baerga error.
63.1572GREAT GAME!!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Oct 25 1995 16:089
    
    
    		THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE HOME!!
    
    
    
    	THE CHIEF,
    		WAHOOOOO!
    
63.1573MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Oct 25 1995 16:188
	What a shock...

	Indians win...Hal returns...is this just some
	mysterious co-inky-dink?  I think not.



	billl
63.1574another extra inning win!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Oct 25 1995 16:2827
    
    	Sorry Bill,  I've just been very busy....hehehehehe....driving back
    and forth to Cleveland...that is.  Lets see, I was at game 1 of the 
    division series in Cleveland.  Then got tickets for game 1 of the ALCS
    which was a good game but not as good at the game 1 of the division
    series.  Couldn't get tickets to the World Series though.
    
    	Never been to better, more excieting games in my life.  Wish I
    could have been there last night for that one!  To me, the games in
    Atlanta just wasn't very excieting at all.  The fans there just didn't
    seem to be into the game.  Now, back in Cleveland.....ITS THE WORLD
    SERIES!!  
    
    	YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE!!!!
    
    	When I got depressed after game 2 in Atlanta, all I had to do was
    put in the video......WAHOO, WHAT A FINISH!  and everything was just
    fine.
    
    	Not worried about the Browns yet....injuries are killing them right
    now.
    
    
    	Go Tribe!!
    
    		WAHOOOOO!
    
63.1575Stiff confessesSALEM::DODAThe halfway house that Ruth builtWed Oct 25 1995 17:259
In case anyone missed it, Jason Grimsley admitted last week that 
he was the person that broke into the umpires room in Chicago 
and stole Belle's corked bat. He crawled through some heating duct 
to get in there. He said he had to substitute Sorrent's bat 
because, "Belle didn't own a bat that wasn't corked."

Fyi, and all that.

daryll
63.1576ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 26 1995 02:382
63.1577Maddox will get lit up 2nightAD::HEATHTribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sportsThu Oct 26 1995 09:416
    
    
    
        All last night meant was Avery will pitch game 7.
    
    Jerry
63.1578PCBUOA::MORGANThu Oct 26 1995 11:0113
    Very wishful thinking I'd say.  Cleveland can't hit the soft serve
    stuff that Maddux will dazzle 'em with tonight.  They've actually
    proven this series that they can't hit much of anything when facing
    baseball's top pitching staff.    What'd they have, 4 hits last night?  
    
    The struttin' and trash talking will soon come to an end (or has it
    already?) and when it's finally over, the Indians will be grouped with 
    the Rangers, Royals, Blue Jays, Mets and yes, the Red Sox as having 
    put up meaningless numbers, because they didn't win it all according to
    Paul Gronowski.  Isn't that right Paul?   ;-)
    
    					Steve
                                                        
63.1579ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 26 1995 11:155
63.1581IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Thu Oct 26 1995 11:286
I hate to say it because I was rooting for the Tribe, but...

	"Stick a fork in 'em..."

There are more enviable tasks than being down 1-3 and facing a rested
Greg Maddux in your next game.
63.1582its not over yet!ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 26 1995 11:293
63.1583Ah never mindCSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Thu Oct 26 1995 11:347
    >>Who's crying... Indians fans are still watching baseball, Boston fans
    >>have resorted to viewing big time wrestling and hockey.
    
      Hey we can watch the Celtics too!  :^) And boy do they suck.
    
    Mike
    
63.1584SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsThu Oct 26 1995 11:3612
RE    <<< Note 63.1582 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>

>    Who's crying... Indians fans are still watching baseball, Boston fans
>    have resorted to viewing big time wrestling and hockey.

  No, the real Boston fans are watching their Braves try to get even for the
beating they took back in 1948.

  Over all the Braves and Indians are now 5-5 in World Series play.

  GO BRAVES!!!!
  George
63.1585ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Oct 26 1995 11:375
    
    Well, I'm not giving up hope.  Last night's game was disappointing,
    but if any team has a chance to come back, it's the Tribe.
    
    Joe
63.1586Just a matter of time know!!!FABSIX::J_PAGEThu Oct 26 1995 11:3915
    
    Great game last night....Avery looked very sharp, Hill was lucky, he
    could have easily been blown out of the game by the 5th inning but
    Justice could come up with the clutch hit. But, he did however get the
    game winner in the seventh, and a spectacular catch to end the game and
    the indians dream of a comeback......Pedro Bourbon jr looked great
    lastnight, coming in in the ninth up by 3 with a man on 2nd. Thome
    watchs strike 3 go right by him, Alomar fans for the 2nd out and Lofton
    hits a drive to right in which justice made a great over the shoulder
    catch..........Oh ya..Belle hit a HR in the 7th, he also made a
    pathetic play trying to get a bloop hit...he had not chance too catch
    it but as he came in on it he went into a slide and went slide right
    past it.......some MVP.
    
      john
63.1587CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearThu Oct 26 1995 11:569
Well, my Dad's happy.

He's the only person I know who actually has been to Braves Field in Boston to
see the Braves play, and of course caught the All-Star game there too.

He doesn't like the Indians (and he doesn't even know Paul or Hal!) and he's
kind of charged up about this recent turn of events.   

I'm rooting for the Braves because of my Dad I guess....
63.1588They were in trouble all night...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Oct 26 1995 12:2812
    
    	As far as Belle's try at the pop behind third...I think you are way
    out of line by saying that.  Albert ran his butt off trying to get to
    the ball.  I was really surprised he made the play that close.  I will
    give Albert some credit in the game last night.  He was really
    husseling on all plays.  Then he hits the HR to the right field on an
    outside pitch.
    	Worst part of the game...was when Travariz threw that 1-2 pitch
    right down the middle of the plate to Justice.  game over...
    	Doesn't look good for the Tribe but I know they can come back.
    
    WAHOOOOO!
63.1589PCBUOA::MORGANThu Oct 26 1995 12:384
    I think you've got your righties and lefties mixed up, Hal.  It wasn't
    Tavarez, it was Assenmacher that Justice drilled back up the middle.
    
    					Steve
63.1590goodbye 50 goodbye 50 goodbye 50 boo hooCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Oct 26 1995 12:551
    
63.1591CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearThu Oct 26 1995 12:5712
>    Tavarez, 
    

The man with a face only a mother could love....


>it was Assenmacher 

This guy reminds me of that Russian guy who plays the Russian immigrant in all
the TV shows.  Can't remember his name -- it might be Yakov Smirnov but I'm not
sure....

63.1592IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Thu Oct 26 1995 13:116
>    	As far as Belle's try at the pop behind third...I think you are way
>    out of line by saying that.

Fancy this coming from the same guy who thought it was out of line to check
the bat of a guy who has been caught corking his bat before.  Hal, you make
Groaner look like an ObjectiveAnalyst...
63.1593fresh off the pressMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Thu Oct 26 1995 13:1711
	"Anything short of a WS win by the Indians would
	HAVE to be considered one of the biggest chokes in
	history!"

	"The small package that arrived at Jacobs Field before
	yesterday's game was opened and found to contain the
	bronzed chicken bone that had been removed from Berice's
	throat when he was cut by the Brown(spot)s(tm)."


	"JaKe"
63.1594USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Oct 26 1995 13:1815
I haven't watched much of this series (I fall into the "general public"
category with MLB if the Yanks aren't involved), but from what little
I've seen tells me that Cle hitters _DON'T_ in the clutch.  Their BA
is pathetic overall, but they might as well pass when it comes to
runners-in-scoring-position-late-in-the-game.

Seattle's lineup (with Griffey, Edgar and Buhner) puts more late-game
fear in the opposition than this Cle lineup (during this post-season).

Sorry Groaner, you had a nice season, but it's over.  Like I said before
it began:  Atlanta in 5 or 6.


And one more thing:  Let's never again hear any reference to the '61 or
'27 Yankees when talking about this Cleveland team (for obvious reasons).
63.1595No baseball this weekend?EDWIN::WAUGAMANWhat's the story morning glory?Thu Oct 26 1995 13:2929
> And one more thing:  Let's never again hear any reference to the '61 or
> '27 Yankees when talking about this Cleveland team (for obvious reasons).
    
    Yeah, let's make it the 1960 Yankees. 
    
    I must offer my sincerest apologies to Bobby Cox and his mentor 
    Bill Breen for my criticisms of the decision to start Steve Avery
    last night.  That worked out in a big way.  I now have a strong 
    feeling that Greg Maddux is going to do something (unusually)
    historic tonight, like maybe throw a no-hitter, or at least a 
    shutout to pull down the MVP honors.
    
    We're not seeing too much of Paul Assenmacher's wife anymore. 
    I think the most overrated part of this Indians' team is their
    bullpen: not including Mesa, there are some real stiffs out 
    there who had career or unexpectedly above-average seasons, but
    have turned back into pumpkins...
    
    I too still am pulling for the Tribe but Paul's groaning does make
    this somewhat palatable.  I feel for you though, Joe H, and in a 
    weaker moment maybe even Hal... ;-)  'Course a ground ball hasn't
    gone through anybody's legs yet or anything like that (we made it
    all the way through yesterday, October 25, without anyone making
    mention of The Anniversary-- there is an upside to no longer having
    TCM around after all).
    
    glenn
    
63.1596SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsThu Oct 26 1995 13:3219
RE                    <<< Note 63.1594 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>I haven't watched much of this series (I fall into the "general public"
>category with MLB if the Yanks aren't involved), but from what little
>I've seen tells me that Cle hitters _DON'T_ in the clutch.  

  I don't agree. As Joe Morgan said, those stats are averages and teams
fluxuate from week to week. The Indians are great hitters but they are up
against great pitchers so they don't look nearly as good. They were hitting
Glavine pretty hard in game 2 but they were hitting right at people. With a
little different luck in that game this series would be all tied up at 2 each. 

  Also, plenty of teams have come back from being down 3-1. In fact this team,
the Braves, blew the 3-1 lead against the Yankees back in '57. 

  The Braves have the edge, no doubt about it but it's a thin edge. If the
Indians win tonight I'd have to say the edge goes back to them in game 6.

  George
63.1597STRATA::GARRYThu Oct 26 1995 14:2413
    re.1596 sleepr::maiewski
    
    I disagree with your statement that this same team the 57 braves blew
    it.
    
    Hell the people on the 95 braves weren't even born yet.......
    
    I am a fan of neither team but past history means ZILCH.
    This Braves team has much better pitching and as the old adage goes 
    good pitching will beat good hitting 95% of the time.
    
    
    Tom
63.1598OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Oct 26 1995 14:264
63.1599SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsThu Oct 26 1995 15:0220
RE                      <<< Note 63.1597 by STRATA::GARRY >>>

>    I disagree with your statement that this same team the 57 braves blew
>    it.
>    
>    Hell the people on the 95 braves weren't even born yet.......
    
  Sorry for the confusion, I'm using the word "team" there to mean franchise.

  It's like when the announcers constantly say "Indians fans are worried
because their team got swept in '54, now they are losing again". Obviously
the '54 Indian team has nothing to do with the '95 Indian team but most
people who follow baseball know that when you say "This team 30-40 years ago"
that is an idiom for "this franchise 30-40 years ago".

  To say that properly, this Braves franchise blew a 3-1 World Series lead
to the Yankees back in 1958 so Braves fans are a bit nervous hoping it
doesn't happen again to this franchise.

  George
63.1600MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 26 1995 15:1313
>   To say that properly, this Braves franchise blew a 3-1 World Series lead
> to the Yankees back in 1958 so Braves fans are a bit nervous hoping it
> doesn't happen again to this franchise.
>
>  George


  Except for one thing, George.  Your selection of the work "so" implies cause
  and effect, and that isn't the case here.  Braves fans are not nervous because
  the Milwaukee Braves blew a 3-1 lead in the 1958 World Series; perhaps most
  are not even aware of this fact.  What people are aware of is the fact that
  the team with arguably the best rotation in each of the last 5 years has
  failed to win even one title.  That makes people nervous.
63.1601SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsThu Oct 26 1995 16:1211
  Well yes and no, Maddux has not been on the Braves all that much time. Those
earlier attempts were with Glavine, Smoltz, Avery, Charlie Leibrandt. I've got
to believe they are stronger now with Maddux.

  Also I don't recall them having anyone down 3 games to 1 during that time.
In 1958 the Braves had the Yankees down 3 games to 1 with Lew Berdette and
Warren Spahn ready to go which is not much different than what you've got
now considering how well Berdette had pitched against the Yankees in 1957 and
and game 1 in 1958.

  George
63.1602"get real"USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Oct 26 1995 16:2713
>  Well yes and no, Maddux has not been on the Braves all that much time. Those
>earlier attempts were with Glavine, Smoltz, Avery, Charlie Leibrandt. I've got
>to believe they are stronger now with Maddux.

Didn't the Braves lose the NLCS in Maddux' 1st year ?


re:  George's "slim edge to Atlanta"

The old adage, "anything can happen", and Yogi's "it ain't over 'til it's
over" apply to a very small percentage of situations.  I think Atlanta
has a HUGE edge with 4-time Cy Young-er Maddux going tonight, and if
needed, the last 2 games in Atlanta.
63.1603If Avery, Braves in 7 else Indians take 7thAKOCOA::BREENThu Oct 26 1995 16:4119
    Frank Way, quit next-unseening'n my notes.
    
    For the third or fourth time, I attended a Braves game in 1952 at old
    Braves field.  My main thought at the time was "for this I missed going
    to Fenway?"
    
    Jerry Heath is right.  Maddox is still vulnerable tonight and Glavine
    too back in Atlanta.  The ultimate choice for Cox will be whether to
    start Smoltz or Avery in game 7.  We now see that using Avery was never
    a sentimental gesture but the professional move of a hard-bitten
    baseball manager who knew he needed the lefthander and may well need
    him again.
    
    I don't think this Indians team will quit and I think Maddox is still
    very good but not dominating.  After tonight it's two more southpaws
    and Hargrove better just live or die with Thome.  He might also think
    of starting Tony Pena a game early.
    
    Billte
63.1604SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsThu Oct 26 1995 16:5022
Re                    <<< Note 63.1602 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>Didn't the Braves lose the NLCS in Maddux' 1st year ?

  What's your point? We're talking about the World Series here and a situation
where the Braves are up 3 games to 1 with Maddux going tonight. In that series
the Brave never had that kind of edge, they lost to the Phillies in 6.

>The old adage, "anything can happen", and Yogi's "it ain't over 'til it's
>over" apply to a very small percentage of situations.  I think Atlanta
>has a HUGE edge with 4-time Cy Young-er Maddux going tonight, and if
>needed, the last 2 games in Atlanta.

  Yes but he's going against another Cy Young-er who holds the current record
for consecutive scoreless innings. And the way Hershirser has been playing
lately the edge is not all that Huge.

  One 19-2 Cy Young-er playing about the same as he's played all year going
against another 16-2 Cy Young-er with a stronger offense playing better than he
played most of the year sounds like a fairly even match up to me. Edge Braves.

  George
63.1605MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 26 1995 17:1415
>  One 19-2 Cy Young-er playing about the same as he's played all year going
>against another 16-2 Cy Young-er with a stronger offense playing better than he
>played most of the year sounds like a fairly even match up to me. Edge Braves.

 16-2 ?  Excuse me ?  Was this 16-6 pitcher ever once mentioned all year
 as a Cy Young candidate ?  What's the difference in their ERA's ?  Oh, well
 over a run a game (close to two runs a game), is it ?  Hmm... 

 Stronger offense ?  You mean the offense hitting in approximately .190 in the 
 World Series ?  You mean the offense being out homered in this series ?  Hmm...

 Atlanta has a HUGE edge.  Hershiser may be equal to the task, no question --
 but this is not a molehill the Indians have to surmount, make no mistake
 about it.  Their best hope is a line drive off Maddox's leg (just as against
 Philadelphia two years ago).
63.1606CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Oct 26 1995 17:238
    
    didn't Maddux come into the Series with the Highest ERA of any of the
    pitchers in post season play? Didn't the Rockies rough him up a bit.
    Indians aren't out of this one yet.
    
    I also agree with Billte, if this one goes to 7, Cox is crazy not to
    pitch Avery who has always pitched circles around Smoltz in the post
    season..........
63.1607SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsThu Oct 26 1995 17:4733
RE                     <<< Note 63.1605 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

> 16-2 ?  Excuse me ?  Was this 16-6 pitcher ever once mentioned all year
> as a Cy Young candidate ?  

  No, of course not. But as Hershiser once said, in this game the only thing
anyone is interested in was "what have you done for me lately". And lately
Hershiser has been pitching much better than he did during the year when he
racked up most of those 16 wins.

> Stronger offense ?  You mean the offense hitting in approximately .190 in the 
> World Series ?  You mean the offense being out homered in this series ?  Hmm...

  During the 1958 Series the Yankees couldn't touch Lew Berdette in game 1
just like they couldn't touch him in 3 games in 1957. Using the exact same
logic you are giving above, which seems to be "if a strong team can't hit a guy
they will never be able to hit a guy", what happened in game 5 didn't happen,
but it did. Moose Skowran suddenly figured out what Berdette was all about and
the pummeling began.

> Atlanta has a HUGE edge.  

  There's no such thing in baseball as a HUGE edge when you have two teams of
this quality. If their edge was so huge, why was game 1 so close? Why has every
game been so close?

  From what you say these games should have been very one sided.

  At any rate, you feel confident if you want, I'm nervous and will be until
the final out and it's because I've seen teams come back from being down 3-1
just like what happened to the Braves in '58.

  George
63.1608SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsThu Oct 26 1995 17:4916
RE            <<< Note 63.1606 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Washing Machine" >>>

>    didn't Maddux come into the Series with the Highest ERA of any of the
>    pitchers in post season play? Didn't the Rockies rough him up a bit.
>    Indians aren't out of this one yet.
    
  Agreed.

>    I also agree with Billte, if this one goes to 7, Cox is crazy not to
>    pitch Avery who has always pitched circles around Smoltz in the post
>    season..........

  Disagreed. In '91 and '92 Smoltz and Avery both did rather well, Glavine and
Lebrandt had problems.

  George
63.1609Cuyahoga River will be overflowing tonight...PCBUOA::MORGANThu Oct 26 1995 18:2514
    Well, Billte, you can't get much more dominant than someone like Maddux
    is these days.  His ERA the past 4 years dwarfs anyone else's in the
    NL.  It's not even close.  I don't even think it's a longshot to say
    that this guy could be the most dominant pitcher I'll get to see in my
    lifetime.  So, I'm going to just sit back and enjoy every minute of
    tonight's game.
    
    I think the key to success for Cleveland's pitching staff prior to this
    series was that they could get batters to hack at balls out of the
    strike zone.  For the most part, Atlanta's batting order has been much
    more patient, and there's no reason to believe that they're going to
    suddenly become impatient at this point.  The series is over tonight.
    
    					Steve
63.1610We'll see; I'm feeling like Indians will find a wayAKOCOA::BREENThu Oct 26 1995 18:327
    Agreed the results show dominance in the National league regular season
    over the last several years.  A good but not great playoff pitcher.  An
    excellent performance in game 1.
    
    Dominance in my mind is Koufax or Gibson or perhaps the 1988/89
    Hershiser.  He certainly has the chance to move into the exclusive club
    of World Series dominating pitchers tonight.
63.1611MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 26 1995 20:2618
>    over the last several years.  A good but not great playoff pitcher.  An
>    excellent performance in game 1.

     He had one terrible outing with the Cubs, allowing 11 runs in one game
     against the Giants.  Against Philly, he was outstanding in winng his
     first appearance of the series, then lost game 6 after getting hit on
     the leg with a line drive.  He gave up 3 runs against Colorado at
     Coors Field, 3 more against them in Fulton County Stadium.  While he 
     wasn't outstanding against Colorado, he pitched fairly well.

     One note on a member of the Braves' staff who isn't mentioned too often:
     Leo Mazzone.  He is one of the best pitching coaches in baseball.
     Tom Glavine has given a lot of credit to Leo for transforming him from
     1990's 9-16 (9-17?) record, to a Cy Young award candidate yearly.
     After his two so-so performances against Colorado in the DS, Leo went
     to Greg Maddux and pointed out a slight flaw in his mechanics.  Maddux
     has since corrected it, and had two outstanding games against Cincinnati
     and Cleveland.  
63.1612Atlanta/Boston - born choke artists - see you monday!ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 27 1995 01:527
63.1613MIMS::MITCHAM_A-Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta)Fri Oct 27 1995 10:3513
    >i'm going to use the same logic to say Greg Maddux is no Cy Young
    >pitcher.  He goes 19-2 against the NL and goes 1-1 against the
    >Indians.  One word - MEDIOCRE!
    
    I'd put our "mediocre" Greg Maddux against any of your little indian
    pitchers any day!
    
    >           -< Atlanta/Boston - born choke artists - see you monday! >-
    
    Yeah, let's see what you have to say Monday (not that I don't know
    already <barf!>)
    
    -Andy
63.1614SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsFri Oct 27 1995 11:1321
  Well so much for the HUGE edge that the untouchable Maddux had over the
anemic .180 hitting creampuffs in the Indian's linup. 

  Albert Bell is coming out of his slumber and becoming ... becoming ... well
he's becoming Albert Bell and last night the Indians hitters looked more like
they did all year than they have for the past couple weeks. This series is as
close as it can be after 5 games and once again the Braves find themselves with
a slight edge being up 3-2. 

  These teams are about as evenly matched as any two teams that have made it to
the fall classic. This is one awsome World Series.

  I like the Braves chances in game 6 but again they only have a slight edge.
Glavine should improve and the Braves should be able to hit Martinez but with
the Indians hitters coming alive Glavine will have his hands full.

  It may well come down to Smoltz v. Nagy in game 7. If it does, I hope Smoltz
brings his stuff to the ballpark.

  GO BRAVES!!!
  George
63.1615NQOS01::16.135.176.215::may_brBRUCE MAYFri Oct 27 1995 13:081
I think they need to check Albert's bat again.  8^)
63.1616ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 27 1995 13:3615
63.1617SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsFri Oct 27 1995 13:489
  Well I wouldn't say the Braves had no chance in game 7, if Smoltz's slider
starts to work he'll be a whole new pitcher. And he's not tired, Nagy should
be feeling his start just a bit.

  But the Braves did have the Indians down on the mat and let'em get back up on
one knee. If they let them off the hook completely in game 6 then we'll have
no fingernails left at all.

  George
63.1618Nice phone message JERKules(tm)!ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 27 1995 16:468
63.1619ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sun Oct 29 1995 01:325
63.1620MIMS::ROLLINS_RCleve.Magic # Still 1948Sun Oct 29 1995 02:462
	Great game by Tom Glavine.  Has their ever been a better pitched game
	in a World Series clincher ?
63.1621SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsSun Oct 29 1995 03:013
  1957, Lew Burdette for the Braves shut out the Yankees in game 7.

  George
63.1622ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsSun Oct 29 1995 22:4922
    
    Jack Morris, '91 was in the same class...
    
    I still think, given 1000 games, the Tribe would win 550-600.
    
    But that simply doesn't matter, because in the games that
    were played and did matter, the Braves won 4 of 6.  That's
    quite an accomplishment, and they deserve all the credit they
    will get for it.  The Tribe didn't _lose_ this Series; they put
    up a noble effort.  The Braves simply _won_ it, with excellent
    pitching and just enough hitting against tough Tribe pitchers.
    
    While I can't say I was happy with the final result, I can say
    that I enjoyed watching the series tremendously, and am proud
    of the job the Tribe did.  Just as the Braves deserve credit
    for defeating the Indians, the Indians deserve credit for putting
    up a good fight against the Braves.
    
    Congrats to the Braves fans, and enjoy - I wouldn't be at all surprised
    if the Tribe has a chance at revenge next year...
    
    Joe
63.1623SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBoston Braves, 1914 ChampsMon Oct 30 1995 12:1314
  Game 2 was probably what did the Indians in. There's an old saying that you
should win at home and split on the road and the Tribe did win at home
including a tough win against the best pitcher in baseball but in Game 2 with
Glavine off his game they failed to capitalize and that came back to haunt
them. 

  Also, luck was against the Tribe. I can't think how many times in this series
players from both teams hit the ball hard with runners on base but hit it right
at someone. 

  Great season for the Tribe, a great showing in the World Series, and a
pennant well deserved. They'll be back next year. 

  George 
63.1624Great SeriesCSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Mon Oct 30 1995 12:316
    Well both teams deserve credit. 5 one run games in a 6 game series must
    be close to a record. The ending of the season was a hell of a lot
    better then the end. Maybe both sides will wake up and realize how
    great this game is and come to an agreement for the next 5-7 years. 
    
    Mike
63.1625ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 30 1995 12:315
63.1626Game 3, Braves led 6-5 in 8thMIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonMon Oct 30 1995 12:375
    Game 3 *WAS* the key game in the series... it kept Cleveland
    from being swept, and allowed Cleveland fans to think they are
    still a better team than Atlanta.  If they played 162 games
    against each other, the Braves would end up with a winning record,
    the Indians a losing record (just because of that pitching).
63.1627IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Mon Oct 30 1995 11:479
>	Great game by Tom Glavine.  Has their ever been a better pitched game
>	in a World Series clincher ?

I don't think so.  A one-hitter, with the only three walks given out to the
guys that could hurt you most.

Best part about it was that it was pitching, not throwing.  Glavine had good
stuff, but (at least from watching on TV) it didn't seem eye-popping.  The
Braves had an *excellent* scouting report for this series...
63.1628Congrats 1995 AL Champs!BRAT::LEARYIndians'95-Biggest choke in MLB historyMon Oct 30 1995 12:4317
    Congratulations to both clubs for outstanding seasons and all the
    tremendous personal performances : regular and post-seasonal.
    
    Other than having to listen to Costas whine, it was a tremendously
    entertaining series.  Great pitching/scouting beat the best bats
    in baseball.  Although according to Bobby Cox the Reds were as loaded 
    with bats as the Tribe?  
    
    Watch out for recurring rematches in the next few years.  The Braves 
    have now wonthe big one in 3 different cities.  Boston, Milwaukee 
    and Atlanta.
    
    Note for next years postseason games in Jacobs Field:
    
    Ditch Chrissie Hynde...
    
    Billerica MA home of the World Series MVP.
63.1629Congrats to BravesAKOCOA::BREENMon Oct 30 1995 13:0813
    Sandy Koufax had a big game 7 in 1965 vs Minnesota and Johnny Podres
    2-0 shutout of the Yankees in 1955 is one of the great ones since it
    was Brooklyn's first and the first Yankee world series defeat since the
    30s.
    
    Lolich in 1968 and that Pirate pitcher in 1971 over the O's (?).  Ah,
    Blass, didn't do much after that.
    
    Would Braves have won it with Blauser and not Belliard?  The latter
    seems to give the pitchers a lot of confidence at ss.
    
    DH factor?  Seems to be a problem for the A.L.  Maybe more
    psychological.
63.1630There is always next year...SNAX::ERICKSONTom Glavine '95 WS MVPMon Oct 30 1995 13:3121
    
    	I believe about 200 replys ago. I stated that I wouldn't be here
    last week. For the record, I have not put anything in Pauls office. Or
    called and left Paul a voice mail.
    
    	I only got to see parts of the games. All I can say is what a
    great series. Five out of six games decided by 1 run. You can't want
    anything more. Can't remember if it was Bobby Cox, or Mike Hargrove.
    Who gave that flip of the coin phrase. That just about sums it up.
    Either team could have won this series. I think Atlanta's WS experience
    was the difference. Atlanta seemed a little more relaxed at the plate.
    While the Indians were pressing a little bit.
    
    	As for next year, I wouldn't be surprised to see Cleveland return
    to the WS. They have a good young team. Another starting pitcher
    should put them over the top. Reason I say another starter. Is because
    Martinez is 40/41, and Hershisher is 38/39 years old. As great as they
    pitched in this years playoffs. You can't realisticly expect two
    40 year old pitchers. To be your #1 and #2 starters in the playoffs.
    
    Ron 
63.1631USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Oct 30 1995 19:0519
>>Didn't the Braves lose the NLCS in Maddux' 1st year ?

>  What's your point?

You said the Braves' earlier attempts to win it all were without Maddux,
which isn't true.  He's been there 3 years.


>>I think Atlanta
>>has a HUGE edge with 4-time Cy Young-er Maddux going tonight, and if
>>needed, the last 2 games in Atlanta.

>  Yes but he's going against another Cy Young-er
>  ....the edge is not all that Huge.

George, you're the king of taking things out of context, or misreading
things.  I said the Braves had a HUGE edge in the Series up 3-1 with Maddux
on the hill in Game 5, and Games 6 & 7 in Atlanta (if needed).  The
combination of the 3 gave Atlanta a HUGE edge.
63.1632another country heard from...MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Oct 31 1995 12:4615
And now for your listening pleasure the Hallelujah Chorus from Handel's
Messiah. A pity that Cleveland still has not championship (yeah, right
soccer, hah!) in many many many moons.

Best part for all you DEC loonies is that Groaner and Hal won't be
totally insufferable for the next year or so. Actually the real
fascinating part is how long it will take them to show up and eat CROW;
and I mean real honest to goodness CROW! not like the mush that Brydie
and company eat :-)

Sorry I won't be able to make it on the 17th. bummer!

The Crazy Met


63.1633MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Oct 31 1995 16:175
    
       So if your team has the highest winning percentage since
      Bill Breen was in grade school and they end up losing to
      the Buffalo Bills of baseball, what does that make them? 
      Baseball's answer to Peter McNeeley?
63.1634MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonTue Oct 31 1995 16:2529
Saw this on the internet as "Top 10 Cleveland Indians Excuses"
Not sure if this was from Letterman, although I think not.  In any case,
I enjoyed #7 the best:


10.  Thought it was best of *17* -- planned on a stunning 7-game comeback win.

9.   Too worried about budget crisis to concentrate on game.

8.   A very lucrative offer from Pete Rose.

7.   Hard-of-hearing equipment manager filled bats with *pork*.

6.   Afraid winners would be kissed by Jane Fonda.

5.   Team really tired from trying to talk Sinead O'Connor into singing
     national anthem.

4.   Braves shouted "swing" when we got bad pitches.

3.   Too tired from shouting match with Hannah Storm.

2.   At the last minute, Belle wanted his soul back.

1.   Too busy choreographing nude locker room dance number for female reporters.
 
-- 
David Schmitt
Kellogg Graduate School of Management '96
63.1635Re: 63.1634MIMS::MITCHAM_A-Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta)Wed Nov 01 1995 10:335
I *love* it.  Just one thing:  Leave out the <FF> between lines next time.
You don't see 'em with the DECwindows Notes interface, and it wastes alot
of paper when you print it...

-Andy
63.1636ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 01 1995 10:507
63.1637Using Paul's logic...PCBUOA::MORGANWed Nov 01 1995 10:5812
    Groaner, I thought it didn't matter what happened 5, 10 or 20 years
    ago?  That's what you always told Celtics fans when they'd bring up the
    fact that they are the most successful basketball franchise in history.
    What matters is now, and the facts are that the Indians were no more
    successful than the Red Sox or any other team outside of the Atlanta
    Braves, for that matter.  Not only didn't the Indians win the
    championship, but the CHOKED in not doing so!!
    
    Your lame barbs at the Red Sox hold no water.
    
    					Steve
                                             
63.1638MIMS::MITCHAM_A-Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta)Wed Nov 01 1995 11:008
>    I thought the "Top 10 Reasons why the Red Sox Can't win the world
>    series" was better...

Yeah, but I could care less about the Red Sox  (and besides, this is 
the Cleveland Indians note, and they were actually there this year and
lost! ;-)

-Andy
63.1639ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 01 1995 11:109
63.1640Do yourself a favor, don't get into attendance figuresPCBUOA::MORGANWed Nov 01 1995 11:444
    Are you comparing that to the 1,800 fans that showed up regularly at 
    Cleveland's Municipal Stadium up until about 3 years ago?
    
    					Steve
63.1641ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Nov 01 1995 11:497
    
    OK, serious question...
    
    Does anyone seriously believe the Indians "choked" by not winning
    the World Series?
    
    Joe
63.1642SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos / Mil / Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 11:567
RE did the Indians choke

  If Groner's ask'en, yes.

  If Joe's ask'en, no.

  George
63.1643BIGQ::MCKAYWed Nov 01 1995 12:014
    I think they choked.  Going in they were the best team in baseball.
    They didn't win.  It's a choke.
    
    Jimbo
63.1644definite gag jobSTRATA::GARRYWed Nov 01 1995 12:047
    I agree they choked.Where were those awesome batting stats when it
    counted ??? Regular season stats don't win world series.
    
    Biggest choke in the last 20 or so years.
    
    
    Tom
63.1645MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonWed Nov 01 1995 12:066
	They didn't choke away a likely win, no.

	They performed rather miserably in the clutch throughout the last
	12 games of the post-season, however.  I would say that there appeared
	to be additional pressure around the throat once the games were on
	the line.
63.1646MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 01 1995 12:0919
    >> Prior to Bird, a person could walk up to the ticket office the 
    >> day of a playoff game and get seats!  That shows what fan support 
    >> was like in Boston.  Enter Bird - Enter "I've been a fan for 20 years.  
    >> I love this sport!"
    
       Wrong again, Groiner. Unlike yourself and your extremely lame
       excuses for the poor support that the Indians received prior
       to this season, we offer no excuses beyond Boston really isn't
       a basketball town. No, we won't blame it on the Garden being a
       dump. Though it was. And no we won't blame it on the teams being 
       lousy. We can't do that because we have the greatest franchise in 
       the history of the sport. It's really only as simple the town
       belonging to the Red Sox and the Bruins and the 'Tics only managed
       to make inroads due to one of the greatest players and one of the
       greatest rivalry in the history of the game. The real question for
       you Clevelanders is how long will you be able to sustain this fan
       support if your team continues to choke in the big one.
    
    
63.1647SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos / Mil / Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 12:1420
  Don't anyone tell Groner I said this but no, I don't think they choked.

  I think the whole purpose of settling the strike and running Major League
baseball this year was to come up with sacrificial offerings to be mowed down
by the Atlanta Braves pitching staff. They were genuine, they were awsome, they
were for real.

  They were solid all year and during the playoffs they faced three of the best
hitting teams in baseball, the Rockies, the Reds, and the Indians and shut them
all down without a single slugfest. The best any team could do against them was
a pitching duel. 

  As someone in the Globe said, the last game was a 1-0 blow out. Once Justice
hit the home run it was over. They were that good.

  The Indians had a fine season and Indians fans should be proud but they got
beat by a better team with one of the best starting rotations of all time. It
finally rained for the Braves and it rained pitchers.

  George
63.1648the Tribe choked!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Nov 01 1995 12:2012
  > the last game was a 1-0 blow out.

	Me thinks "someone" should stick to commentating
	on figure skating and "mega-media" trials if'n he
	thinks 1-0 in baseball is a "blow out".


	
	JMHO
	billl

63.1649SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Wed Nov 01 1995 12:2210
    
    	Yes, Cleveland CHOKED. The had the best record in baseball. A
    team BA of .295 for the season. Led the league in Homeruns and many
    other categorys. When the playoffs started, the players choked and
    didn't hit very well. I believe Cleveland got out homered in all
    three playoff series. What was there team BA for the entire playoffs?
    It was probably right around .200. Which is a dramtic drop in
    production.
    
    Ron
63.1650ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Nov 01 1995 12:2525
    
    The reason I ask...
    
    IMHO, there are three ways a team can choke:
    
    1) Against a roughly equal opponent, have the game/series in hand,
       and then lose it.
    
    2) Lose against a notably inferior opponent.
    
    3) Against a roughly equal opponent, get blown out.
    
    Which means, as I see it, the only team to choke in the 1995
    baseball playoffs was the Yankees, on the basis of #1.
    
    But the only argument I see for the Indians choking is #2, and I
    don't buy that.  Even though I did believe the Tribe to be the 
    superior team, I was never convinced that the gap was huge; add
    in the homefield advantage for Atlanta, and while I would not
    _predict_ an Atlanta victory, it's hardly _choking_ on the part
    of the Indians not to win.
    
    JMHO,
    
    Joe
63.1651SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos / Mil / Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 12:2514
RE   <<< Note 63.1648 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Some gave all..." >>>

>	Me thinks "someone" should stick to commentating
>	on figure skating and "mega-media" trials if'n he
>	thinks 1-0 in baseball is a "blow out".

  Me thinks you weren't watching the game or if you were you didn't understand
what you were seeing.

  The phrase is in reference to the fact that Tommy Glavine and Mark Wohlers
were practically unhittable and a 1 run lead against the best hitting team in
baseball was as good as a blowout.

  George
63.1652IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Wed Nov 01 1995 12:2813
I would say it was a minor choke.  Atlanta is, and has been, a very good team.
No shame in losing to them.  It by no means should be mentioned in the same
breath as the Buckner collapse in 1986.

It wasn't so much that Cleveland lost as the way that they lost.  We were
treated to "Cleveland Indians == BATTING POWER" p-names, and the Tribe had the
most ballyhooed offense in recent years, then basically didn't hit much in the
playoffs.  A 100-44 record indicates that they did a pretty good job of 
beating up on *everybody* during the regular season, which would make you
expect more of the same in the World Series.

Speaking of all of this, where's Hal?
63.1653ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 01 1995 12:339
63.1654SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos / Mil / Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 12:3418
RE       <<< Note 63.1650 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>    Even though I did believe the Tribe to be the 
>    superior team, I was never convinced that the gap was huge; 

  The Tribe wasn't the superior team. They had superior hitting and good
pitching but the Braves had superior pitching and good hitting.

  If the Tribe made a mistake I think it was in not adjusting their rotation so
that Nagy pitched more. Martinez and Hershire were outstanding in the playoffs
but they are getting old and that Mariners series left them drained. If Nagy
had pitched 2 games in each series the older guys would have had more stuff for
the World Series and the odds are the outcome would have been different. 

  As it was Nagy only pitched once per series. His younger age and stamina were
wasted. 

  George
63.1655ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 01 1995 12:356
63.1656Get rid of the swagger, until you've won somethingEDWIN::WAUGAMANIf you're traveling back to GeorgiaWed Nov 01 1995 12:3812
>    Does anyone seriously believe the Indians "choked" by not winning
>    the World Series?
    
    I think they underachieved, which can be upgraded to "choke" when
    you consider how arrogant so many of the Indians' players seem
    to be.  I didn't really see it until they were on the national stage
    (the Braves sure saw it), but these Indians really could become 
    dislikable over the years for reasons other than the Groaner... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
63.1657BIGQ::MCKAYWed Nov 01 1995 12:458
    Red Sox were supposed to lose to the Indians = no choke
    Indians should have won it all IMO, they didn't = choke
    
    Choke means a thousand different things to a thousand different
    people, it's useless to try and define it, but in the 96 Websters
    edition they'll be a team picture of the Indians next to CHOKE.
    
    Jimbo
63.1658I haven't had time to check "The Line" yet...IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Wed Nov 01 1995 12:4627
>    A team can only choke if:
>    
>    a) they are favored
>    b) if they have home field advantage 
>    
>    The Indians didn't choke v.s. Atlanta because they had neither.

Pardon me?  They had a).  And to boot...

from 63.1508 (authored by ROCK::GRONOWSKI)
>    The Indians will win the World Series this year because it is DESTINY!
>    
>    They have never lost a playoff series to the Red Sox and they destroyed
>    them.
>    
>    They have never lost a playoff series to the Mariners and they busted
>    them up!
>    
>    They have never lost a playoff series to the Braves and they will eat
>    them up and spit them out.

from 63.1519
>    I agree, Braves will three-peat-choke in 4 or 5.



Who is the world to argue with such genius and certitude?
63.1659MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Nov 01 1995 13:079
	Hard to believe Groaner forgot to delete those.

	The lack of clutch hitting (ala 1980's Pgh Pirates)
	when it was most needed is why I consider this a 
	choke.



	billl
63.1660choke/no choke?SUBPAC::SKALSKIWed Nov 01 1995 13:1918
    
    
    		No choke here.
    
    
    	The tribe lost against a superior pitching staff.  Where'd they
    	get the monster averages from?  Against the rest of the AL pitching
    	staffs.  Had the tribe played in the NL would their averages been
    	as high.  Cleveland needs to look at why they lost and fix IT.
    	IT being a better starting rotation than this years team.  Had
    	Cleveland played anyone other than the Braves I think the outcome
    	would have been different.  As it was the best 2 teams from both 
    	leagues showed up and the better team won.
    
    						JMHO	Shark
    
    
    
63.1661CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Nov 01 1995 13:204
    
    Lakers were loaded and still need the refs to get by the Pistons. I
    would call Chicago's threepeat more specatcular......and neither is
    greater than 8 straight.....
63.16625 1 run gamesCSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Wed Nov 01 1995 13:234
    Indians didn't choke.
    Good pitching beats good hitting most of the time.
    
    JMHO
63.1663MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonWed Nov 01 1995 13:3512
>    1) Against a roughly equal opponent, have the game/series in hand,
>       and then lose it.
>    
>    2) Lose against a notably inferior opponent.
>    
>    3) Against a roughly equal opponent, get blown out.

     Well, I would add a fourth way:

     4) Have numerous opportunities to win games, and thereby the series,
        against a team that is equal (or inferior) and continually waste
        those opportunities.
63.1664nothing but a chokeOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Nov 01 1995 13:564
63.1665SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 01 1995 13:588
  Of course one factor in baseball is that since there are never any real
inter-league games until the World Series we don't really know what those 100
A.L. wins really mean. 

  Also, against the Braves the Indians were 2-1 with the DH and 0-3 without the
DH. That continues to be a factor. 

  George
63.1666RE: -2 Huh?CNTROL::SALMONWed Nov 01 1995 14:015
    re: -1663
             But the team that continualy left men on base (in scoring
    position) did NOT lose! The Braves continualy left men in scoring
    prosition and WON the series. They won it on superior pitching! Nobody
    every claimed they were a GREAT hitting team.
63.1667No shame on Indians hereAKOCOA::BREENWed Nov 01 1995 14:057
    I couldn't call the Indians effort a choke by any means, especially
    when they won game 5 against Maddox.  Their hitting which GM Hart
    described as "feasting against teams 3,4,5 pitchers" was overrated for
    a short series condition.
    
    Look at Cinci and some good Dodger teams in the 70s vs As and later the
    Yankees.  Not to speak of 1970 Reds vs Orioles.
63.1668MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonWed Nov 01 1995 14:063
	He said that he considered there were 3 ways to choke; I pointed
        out that I thought there was a 4th way.  I didn't say I thought it
        necessarily applied to the Indians.
63.1669Misunderstood!CNTROL::SALMONWed Nov 01 1995 14:105
    Re: -1
          Oh, OK. I thought you were implying it to the Indians.
    
          GREAT series though, neither team or it's fans should be
          dissapointed!
63.1670SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Wed Nov 01 1995 14:277
    
    	Needless to say everybody will change there tune. When Groaner
    says that the Red Sox didn't choke against Cleveland. They just lost
    to a better team. Since Paul still feels that the Sox choked against
    Cleveland. Then Cleveland DEFINITELY CHOKED against Atlanta.
    
    Ron   :^)
63.1671ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 01 1995 14:354
63.1672SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Wed Nov 01 1995 14:429
    
    	re .1671,
    
    		Its called rooting for your team. Even though realisticly
    they don't have a chance. You could also call it NON-Bandwagon
    jumping. You stick with your team until the end. Did I root for the
    Sox to beat Cleveland? YES.  Did I honestly think they would win? NO
    
    Ron
63.1673ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 01 1995 14:477
63.1674MIMS::MITCHAM_A-Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta)Wed Nov 01 1995 15:0429
RE: Note 63.1671 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI:

>    Red Sox had home field advantage against the Indians and everyone in
>    RED_SOX told me how the Indians would lose.  If that's not a choke,
>    what is?

What's this infatuation you have with the Red Sox?  The Indians beat them
in the playoffs -- isn't that enough?  No wonder they call you "Groaner"...

RE: Note 63.1673 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI:

>    I get it, so if you say the "Sox are going to beat the Indians in the
>    playoffs" in the notesfile, and the Sox lose, you really didn't mean
>    they would win, you just wanted them to win.  Of course, if the Sox
>    did win, then we'd be hearing, "I predicted the Sox would beat the 
>    Indians."

Well, let's see...I've taken the liberty to change a few words in the above
paragraph, a sorta litmus test if you will, to see if you've got it:

>    I get it, so if I say the "Indians are going to beat the Braves in the
>    World Series" in the notesfile, and the Indians lose, I really didn't
>    mean they would win, I just wanted them to win.  Of course, if the
>    Indians did win, then you'd be hearing, "I predicted the Indians would beat
>    the Braves."

Yep, I think you've got it.

-Andy
63.1675Congrats to AtlantaSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Nov 02 1995 20:5735
    
    	Have to give Atlanta some credit for the big win on Saturday.
    10 more feet on two of those balls hit in the 9th could have tied it.
    Feel sorry for ole Carlos though.....ends 3 games with him at bat.
    Smart job of not pitching to Albert.  Hard to believe the Indians 
    couldn't score 1 run in the final game.  This will be riding hard on
    the Tribe throughout the winter.
    
    	I will have to say one thing about the umps......I really thought
    they called a very bad series.  Didn't like that last ump at all!!!
    I really can't believe they call those balls that are 6-8 inches
    outside, strikes.  It had to make the Indians feel they had to swing at
    anything close...not their style.  
    
    	Only problem I saw with the Indians was Manny.....you just got to 
    run alittle bit.  In both games 1 and 2, I felt he could have made a 
    couple of those plays out there....instead, he took the sure approach
    instead of the ... give an extra 50% and if the ball gets by, Lofton
    will get it.
    
    	At any rate, many of those games could have gone the other way if
    a timely hit was made.  Many opertunities were not taken advantage of.
    Greatest Series I've ever seen!  I just feel lucky I was able to see
    game 1 of the divisional series and game 3 of the ALCS.  I'll never
    forget it!!!  Made me feel like a 12 yr old....  
    
    	Ladies and Gentelman......welcome to the main event.......I loved
    game 3!  Mom said she was getting season tickets for next year....good
    deal!  
    
    	Long live the Chief.....
    
    		WAHOOOOO!
    
    
63.1676I don't think so!ACISS1::WIERSBECKI sweat Mickey MouseFri Nov 03 1995 12:008
    Maybe this has been discussed, but that PA announcer prior to Game 3
    made the introductions sound like you were at a WWF Main Event.  I'll
    bet a lot of purists were rolling over on that one.
    
    Could you see that at Fenway or Yankee Stadium?
    
    
    Spud
63.1677MIMS::MITCHAM_A-Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta)Mon Nov 06 1995 14:3111
>    Maybe this has been discussed, but that PA announcer prior to Game 3
>    made the introductions sound like you were at a WWF Main Event.  I'll
>    bet a lot of purists were rolling over on that one.

The start of game 3 had me *rolling* (ha ha ha).  First they start out
with some drab (dark?) background music and announce the names of the
Braves team while the fans boo (yes, boo).  Then, when the Indians team
gets announced, the whole production changes like they are the saviors of
the world!  Tee hee, really had me reeling... :-)

-Andy
63.1678ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Tue Dec 12 1995 00:2411
63.1679PCBUOA::MORGANTue Dec 12 1995 10:565
    Re:  The best get better.
    
    I wasn't aware that Atlanta had made any moves to improve their team.
    
    					Steve
63.1680IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Tue Dec 12 1995 11:353
>    The Indians are on the move...

Whew!  For a second I thought you meant the vans were lined up... :-)
63.1681IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Tue Dec 12 1995 11:365
>    Re:  The best get better.
>    
>    I wasn't aware that Atlanta had made any moves to improve their team.

Cut him a *little* slack.  At least they were the best AL team...
63.1682ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Dec 12 1995 11:569
    
>    Meanwhile, Aggie headed back to Minnesota.  You got to love those
>    trades.
    
    Hmmm... if you _don't_ believe Frankie R. is going to be a decent
    major league pitcher, wouldn't _you_ rather have the two extra
    draft picks?
    
    Joe
63.1683USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Dec 12 1995 12:285
>    Hmmm... if you _don't_ believe Frankie R. is going to be a decent
>    major league pitcher, wouldn't _you_ rather have the two extra
>    draft picks?

I don't believe Boston gets draft picks, since they didn't offer arbitration.
63.1684CSLALL::BRULEcountry in need of a leaderTue Dec 12 1995 12:3910
    Boston has nothing but the memory of Aggie serving up the gopher ball
    to Belle to show for the trade. But I think that they still needed to
    make the deal. If DD hadn't the starting pitchers probably would have
    revolted because of all of the blown saves. The interesting thing about
    Aggie is that they are making him a starter. A lot of his incentives
    are related to stats that starting pitchers get. Boston is banking on
    picking up a reliever cheaply in the Free Agent market. Aggie lost
    about 1-2 mill per year by the Red Sox not picking up his contract.
    
    Mike
63.1685SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Dec 12 1995 12:469
  I agree with Mike, Aggie was a gamble that didn't pay off. Had he gotten
Bell out the Indians would have come to fenway tied 1 game each and who knows
what would have happened? Obviously the odds would still have been with the
Indians but the Sox would have been alive.

  When ever a team makes a trade of a prospect for a guy who can help right
now that always looks bad if they don't win.

  George
63.1686ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Dec 12 1995 12:484
    
    My error - I thought he'd been offered arbitration.
    
    Joe
63.1687CSLALL::BRULEcountry in need of a leaderTue Dec 12 1995 12:5912
    Joe,
    I think that's where the Sox blew it. If they offer arbitration then
    they would have gotten draft picks if someone signs him. If nooone
    signs him then the Sox can still negotiate with him. If Aggie gets what
    he wants from the arbitrator it's still only a one year deal. If the
    Sox were to win the arbitration they have a proven relief pitcher.
    
    The Indians have done a nice job with their contracts this year. I
    think they made a good deal with Nagy. Gammons said that they've sold
    out the park for next year. Maybe they'll take that money and get one
    more hitter like McGriff or a pitcher. They have to start to think
    about what it will take to beat the Braves in the WS
63.1688Albert needs someLUDWIG::BTOWERTue Dec 12 1995 13:041
    Maybe they'll use some of the money to send Albert to Charm School*(((
63.1689ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsTue Dec 12 1995 13:068
    Braves already re-signed McGriff, as well as Grissom.  Only folks they
    didn't offer contracts to were O'Brien, Pena (got a minor league
    contract with the Marlins) and I think Deveraux.  Could be others but
    it looks like the lineup will stay the same.  Merker could be gone
    too.
    
    
    UMDan
63.1690ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Dec 12 1995 13:1311
    
>    Maybe they'll use some of the money to send Albert to Charm School*(((
    
    Do you subscribe to BA?
    
    Albert's problem _isn't_ that he needs charm school.  Under the right
    circumstances he can be a very pleasant person.  His problem is that
    he has both a temper _and_ a short fuse.  A stress management course
    might be more useful...
    
    Joe
63.1691IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Tue Dec 12 1995 13:311
...or lithium
63.1692EDWIN::WAUGAMANNever make it up to Coeur D'AleneTue Dec 12 1995 14:0713
    I don't think the Sox were permitted to offer Aguilera arbitration.
    He had the one-year option, so it was pick that up or nothing.  And
    at $4.5M, it wasn't worth it.
    
>    Albert's problem _isn't_ that he needs charm school.  Under the right
>    circumstances he can be a very pleasant person.
    
    Couldn't you say that about just about anyone?  Under controlled 
    laboratory conditions, the Groaner can actually be a nice guy... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
63.1693MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonTue Dec 12 1995 14:097
>    Couldn't you say that about just about anyone?  Under controlled 
>    laboratory conditions, the Groaner can actually be a nice guy... ;-)

     I suspect I could get a $10-15 million grant from the federal govt
     to test this theory.  I would suspect my research would not bear this
     supposition out.    

63.1694btw, too bad about the big guy; but keep him out of animationAKOCOA::BREENTue Dec 12 1995 14:285
    But Glenn,  a frosty in the tummy, another ice cole one on the table, a
    choice fenway ducat in the pocket and a short walk across the street
    for nine innings of his favorite pastime is hardly "laboratory
    conditions".  Even the late lamented Godzilla could produce a smiley
    here.
63.1695USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Dec 12 1995 16:357
re:  Cleveland's signings

6 years for Omar Vizquel ???  6 years is a gamble on anyone.

And 4 for Ramirez ?  He's had one good year.  I know Joe H's formulas
have him breaking the career HR record, but c'mon.  But hey, there's
no salary cap in MLB, so who cares...
63.1696ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Dec 12 1995 17:1934
    
    JoeG,
    
>re:  Cleveland's signings
>
>6 years for Omar Vizquel ???  6 years is a gamble on anyone.

    OK, I 99% agree with you here.  Giving a 6 year contract to
    Vizquel probably will prove to be a bad move (particularly
    with Wilson on the way), and 6 years is a gamble on anyone.
    In a few cases, it's a very _reasonable_ gamble (never with
    pitchers, and only rarely with hitters), but it's still a
    gamble. 
    
>And 4 for Ramirez ?  He's had one good year.  I know Joe H's formulas
>have him breaking the career HR record, but c'mon.  But hey, there's
>no salary cap in MLB, so who cares...
    
    Joe, whether or not Ramirez breaks the HR record or even comes
    close, this was an _incredibly_ good move; rather the opposite of
    what the Yankees have been doing lately, so I can understand if you're
    jealous... B^)
    
    Ramirez has had two good years in the majors, and three good years in
    the minors before that.  He's the kind of player you _always_ want
    to lock up - barring injury (which the Indians probably bought
    insurance in case of), he should only improve over the course of the
    contract.  It's not a mega-bucks contract; compare it to what other
    great young hitters (Thomas, Griffey) will end up grossing in the
    3rd through 6th years of their careers, and it's a bargain.  It's
    just the kind of contract the Yankees should be getting ready for
    Jeter in another year.
    
    Joe
63.1697USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Dec 12 1995 19:104
Joe H,

How did Cleveland get Ramirez from the Mets ?  Did some in NY miss
the ball on this kid, or could he be a one-year wonder ?
63.1698ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Dec 12 1995 19:2318
    
    Joe,
    
>How did Cleveland get Ramirez from the Mets ?  Did some in NY miss
>the ball on this kid, or could he be a one-year wonder ?
    
    You're getting players confused - the Tribe got Jeromy Burnitz
    from the Mets; he's a very useful player, but very unlikely at
    this point to ever see stardom, and has only about a 50-50 shot
    at ever being a regular (though he would be better than a number
    of regulars right now).  Burnitz was acquired along with Roe (P)
    from the Mets for Mlicki (P), Byrd (P), and DiPoto (P).
    
    Ramirez was originally drafted by the Tribe, and came up through
    the system.  He's the real deal, and has not one, but two very good
    ML seasons already under his belt.  He's also only 23 (24?).
    
    Joe
63.1699ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 00:4117
63.1700Take two of these and call me in the mornin.LUDWIG::BTOWERWed Dec 13 1995 10:1518
Re .1690
        
>    Maybe they'll use some of the money to send Albert to Charm School*(((
    
    Do you subscribe to BA?
    
    ** No, Do you subscribe to the New England Journal of Medicine
    
    Albert's problem _isn't_ that he needs charm school.  Under the right
    circumstances he can be a very pleasant person.  His problem is that
    he has both a temper _and_ a short fuse.  A stress management course
    might be more useful...
    
    Joe
    
    ** I'll take your word for it. Take a chill pill ok Doc. I could care
       less about what's wrong with Albert Belle. Obviously your a little
       sensitive about it though.
63.1701ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 10:584
63.1702IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Wed Dec 13 1995 11:524
>    Hey pal, watch it or i'll send some slimy guys over there to rough you
>    up!

Keep your family out of it!  :-)
63.1703WWF HLO Cage MatchLUDWIG::BTOWERWed Dec 13 1995 12:108
    Whoa, Grono off the bench for a third man in.  
    
    Looks like it's gonna be the first floor against the third floor. Two
    outta three falls. I'll take IMJIMBO as a tag team partner*((((
    
    PS. Iceman, Did the Cleveland Barons ever win a Stanley Cup?   
    
                                                       Bruce
63.1704USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Dec 13 1995 13:2713
>    Ramirez is not a one year wonder, and if you believe that, well,
>    I'll put less weight on your comments in the future.  As Joe H
>    said, Manny has had two solid seasons and is still *VERY* young.

What were Ramirez' '94 #s (please) ?


Hey Groaner, at the top for the next 3-5 years ???  Those young pitchers
(Tavarez, Ogea, and whoever is in the minors) better develop into big-time
starters for that to come true, 'cause Martinez and Hershiser *might* have
one more good year left in 'em (as #1 and #2 in the rotation).  Despite
all their hitting abilities, if not for Orel, they either wouldn't have
been in the Series, or would have been skunked.
63.1705ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 14:0415
63.1706Ramirez much more than a one-year wonder...IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Wed Dec 13 1995 14:1317
>    Ramirez played in 91 games in 1994.  He hit .269 with 17 HRs and 60
>    RBI.  Projected to 162 games that's 30 Hrs, and 107 RBI.

Just some further info.  Stats, Inc. projected players out, keeping in mind
percentage of games they'd played to that point, who was left on the schedule,
etc., etc. (This is regarding 1994.)

Ramirez projected to 26 HR, 79 RBI for the year - not quite as impressive as a
162-games played projection, but still nothing to sneeze at.  I believe the
games played estimate for him was somewhere in the 130s - I hope to check it
tonight.  (I also think his BA projection was somewhere around .275 or so.)

Not that I'm inclined to jump to the defense of the Indian faithful, but in
this case I think calling Ramirez a "one-year wonder" is too harsh.

I agree with Groaner about the Listach/Lofton travesty.  Lofton helped carry my
Rotisserie team to the pennant that year... :-)
63.1707ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 14:256
63.1708USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Dec 13 1995 14:354
Hey Groaner, I merely asked if giving Ramirez a 4-year contract after one
big year is a risk.  Your pointing out Listash and Hamelin are PERFECT
examples of kids who blew their wad upon arrival, and have done nothing
since.
63.1710SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Dec 13 1995 15:3316
RE                    <<< Note 63.1708 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>Hey Groaner, I merely asked if giving Ramirez a 4-year contract after one
>big year is a risk.  Your pointing out Listash and Hamelin are PERFECT
>examples of kids who blew their wad upon arrival, and have done nothing
>since.

  Giving anyone a 4 year contract is a risk but Ramirez is a better bet than
Listash. Listash never really had much in the way of power, Ramirez does. He
also seems to have good bat control for a power hitter. He's a bit of a hot
head but that usually gets better not worse.

  Earlier someone mentioned his coming from New York. Actually he grew up in
New York which may have caused the confusion.

  George
63.1711ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Dec 13 1995 16:0216
    
>    Do you subscribe to BA?
    
>    ** No, Do you subscribe to the New England Journal of Medicine
    
    I only asked because the cartoon in the most recent Baseball America
    suggests that Belle's off season training consists of going to charm
    school...
    
>    ** I'll take your word for it. Take a chill pill ok Doc. I could care
>       less about what's wrong with Albert Belle. Obviously your a little
>       sensitive about it though.
    
    Not particularly, to be honest; just offering my perspective.
    
    Joe
63.1712As Rosanne Rosanna danna Said "Never Mind"LUDWIG::BTOWERWed Dec 13 1995 16:433
    Oh,   Insert embarrassed Face here.
    
    Me and Jimbo stll want Grono in the cage though*(((
63.1713ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 17:044
63.1714ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 17:0617
63.1715USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Dec 13 1995 17:103
>    I could get the Naughty NoTY award this year

What about the "Obnoxious NotY" ?
63.1717ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 17:193
63.1718ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 17:202
63.1719ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 17:203
63.1720ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 17:213
63.1722ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 13 1995 17:353
63.1723USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Dec 14 1995 16:352
WFAN is reporting that Cleveland is holding a press conference today
to announce they've signed McDowell.
63.1724Parade in October! PCBUOA::MORGANThu Dec 14 1995 17:331
    
63.1725Good moveCSLALL::BRULEcountry in need of a leaderThu Dec 14 1995 17:457
    This puts Cleveland way above all other AL teams. They should be the
    favorites to win the AL. So the starters should be Martinez,
    Orel,MacDowell,Ogea and Nagy? Does this give them enough to get by
    Atlanta? Now will someone please tell me that nothing is more importent
    then a smart front office.  
    
    Mike
63.1726USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Dec 14 1995 17:503
>    This puts Cleveland way above all other AL teams.

And in the spot to be the '96 "disappointment of the year".
63.1727SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Dec 14 1995 17:5910
  Well it puts them ahead on paper. But then that assumes that no one gets
hurt, no one has a bad year, no one gets old and looses it, the team continues
to be well coached, etc.

  In baseball the difference between the best team and the next few is never
so great that these types of problems can't reel that team back in. The Indians
have been the best team in the league two years in a row now. It's difficult
to keep dodging bullets and keep that kind of string going.

  George
63.1728Injuries are keyODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsThu Dec 14 1995 18:1310
    re. -1 - You got that right, George.  Atlanta's success can be tied to
    the fact that their starting pitchers have by and large been injury
    free.  The other injuries on the team have been minor, and the subs
    have performed when called on.  Have Justice, Maddux and a Lopez go
    down at once and your talking a whole different game then.         

    As long as Cleveland and Atlanta stay healthy, look for a repeat
    appearance by both in the WS.

    UMDan
63.1729GLRMAI::FINIZIOThu Dec 14 1995 18:225
    
    
    	CNN also reported that the indians are making an offer to 
    	Kevin Brown.......
    
63.1730ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Thu Dec 14 1995 18:515
63.1731They are the favoritesCSLALL::BRULEcountry in need of a leaderThu Dec 14 1995 18:543
    That's right Paul, Anything less then a World Series win for the
    Indians would be a big Choke. The Sox are still 2-3 years away.
    
63.1732GLRMAI::FINIZIOThu Dec 14 1995 19:266
    
    
    	McDowell is a good pitcher but not a great pitcher IMO...however
    	it is a good move by the tribe....anyone hear how many Years
    	he's getting?
    
63.1733Nothing but the Championship is a choke: BACK-2-BACKOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Dec 14 1995 20:075
63.1734ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Thu Dec 14 1995 21:269
63.1735McDowell needs offensive 'cause he ain't that goodAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherFri Dec 15 1995 10:219
    
    
      McDowell will win about 25 games or so for the Indians, for the
    reason Paul stated.  He puts in alot of innings and is around for
    most of his decisions.  Point is though Cleveland is the only team
    that can afford to let a starting pitcher give up 4 runs a game and
    still win.
    
    Jerry
63.1736USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Dec 15 1995 13:058
Cleveland gets into the post-season with or without McDowell, and
he's not that good that he's going to win big games in the post-season
(ala Hershiser).  So it's like, "why bother" ?  But, the way I see it,
McDowell gives them insurance in case one of their OLD GUYS (ie: Martinez,
Hershiser) breaks down.  It's going to happen eventually...'96, '97...

And yes, McDowell is a good fit for Cleveland 'cause he's a work horse,
and that offense can support a 4-5 ERA.
63.1737ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Dec 15 1995 13:1137
    
>            -< McDowell needs offensive 'cause he ain't that good >-
    
    You know, for a while I got annoyed at how the general opinion of
    McDowell was that he was the best pitcher (or very close to it)
    in baseball; he wasn't, he was merely a good, consistent pitcher.
    Now that's been turned around - when people discovered that he wasn't
    great, they decided he wasn't good, but he is - he's the 90's version
    of Jack Morris.
    
    At this point, I expect the Indians to do approximately as well as they
    did last year.  The pitching should be roughly equal or a little
    better - we can't expect as good performances from Mesa, Tavarez,
    Hershiser, and Martinez, but could see better performances from Nagy,
    Ogea, and Poole, and McDowell is better than the Black/Grimsley/Hill
    combo.
    
    Offensively, Belle and Murray are likely to be down, we still can't
    anticipate any particular contribution from the catcher slot, and
    Vizquel's still Vizquel, but a year older; Thome, Ramirez, and Baerga
    should be able to put up roughly the same performance as last year;
    Lofton should be healthy, and therefore better, and Franco will take
    at bats away from Sorrento (who won't be around) and Murray.  Also,
    Giles & Burnitz will replace Kirby and Winfield, which can't hurt.
    
    There's no reason to expect the team to be _better_ than last year,
    really, but good reason to expect them to be _as good_, which is
    a major accomplishment.
    
    And yes, JoeG, I agree - if the Tribe _doesn't_ make it to the World
    Series again next year, they will be a significant disappointment.
    But they certainly seem to be doing something towards that end, and
    I wouldn't anticipate a collapse.  They're in a better position to
    survive injuries, though of course a rash of injuries would still
    hurt.
    
    Joe
63.1738SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Fri Dec 15 1995 13:2212
    
    	Sox fans have to come to the conclusion that Fenway park must go.
    The Sox will not win a WS playing in Fenway. The economics of baseball
    have changed and the Sox can't compete anymore. The Tribe has sold
    out Jacobs field for '96. Which has enabled them to increase there
    payroll to 43 million and still make money. DD worked miracles in 
    Montreal with a small payroll. He should be able to put together a
    competitive team in Boston with a 34-36 million payroll. Without the
    added revenue of a 55-60K stadium. The Sox will always be one or two
    players short.
    
    Ron
63.1739ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Fri Dec 15 1995 13:3615
63.1740Just a couple more reasons to dislike the Tribe...EDWIN::WAUGAMANNever make it up to Coeur D'AleneFri Dec 15 1995 14:168
    McDowell will win 24-25 games in his dreams.  I'll take the under on
    that one.  If the Tribe is picking up both McDowell and Kevin Brown, 
    they've obviously decided that one Albert Belle-sized attitude is not 
    enough.  
    
    glenn
    
63.1741Jack McDowell: Public Enemy #1EDWIN::WAUGAMANNever make it up to Coeur D'AleneFri Dec 15 1995 14:1812
> Cleveland gets into the post-season with or without McDowell, and
> he's not that good that he's going to win big games in the post-season
> (ala Hershiser).  So it's like, "why bother" ? 
    
    Gotta admit that this is quite a reversal, Joe.  I'd been singing this
    tune but a couple of short months ago it was supposedly McDowell and
    Cone that were going to propel the Yankees to a pennant, those
    "big game" pitchers in a short series...
    
    glenn
    
63.1742CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Dec 15 1995 14:498
    
    MCdowell's a stiff. I wish the Indians had passed on the bum. He had a
    few good years when the Soxs where scoring 8 9 runs a ballgame for him.
    Teams have figured him out and he's been on the decline the last few
    years and imo will continue to decline. Bad move should have let the
    Yankees keep the bum........
    
    mike
63.1743IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Fri Dec 15 1995 15:176
>If the Tribe is picking up both McDowell and Kevin Brown, 
>    they've obviously decided that one Albert Belle-sized attitude is not 
>    enough.  

I'd say that about Kevin Brown, but not necessarily McDowell.  McDowell is
an outspoken guy, so he catches more flak from the media than most folks.
63.1744GLRMAI::FINIZIOFri Dec 15 1995 16:114
    
    
    yeah and he knows how to flip the bird!
    
63.1745ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Fri Dec 15 1995 16:225
63.1746EDWIN::WAUGAMANNever make it up to Coeur D'AleneFri Dec 15 1995 16:2511
>    So he flipped the fans the bird... so Belle lost his cool and drilled
>    an alcoholic in the chest with a ball for being taunted... you people
>    are hypocrites...  I'm sure every single person in here has done
>    something like this in their life at least once.
    
    Never flipped anyone the bird (that would be hypocritical for a 
    non-Mass driver), but I have drilled a few alcoholics in my day...
    
    glenn
    
63.1747Indians are so much better than the rest of the ALTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Fri Dec 15 1995 17:037
    McDowell is a good innings man who will be a nice addition to the
    Indians rotation, but he is an above average pitcher, not a great one. 
    I think he'll go something like 18-7 with at 3.75 or so ERA, as the
    Indians set a major league record for winning percentage in a season at
    .770 in 1996.
    
    NAZZ
63.1748a great signingIMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Fri Dec 15 1995 17:2722
basically a rehash of other comments:

	o  Indians have tons of offense, so they need nothing more than
	   a solid innings guy.

	o  McDowell is a great innings guy - doesn't put up the *monster*
	   ERA numbers, but he's very consistent

	o  He also has quite a few years left in him

	o  He also comes cheaper than Cone will, with Cone not providing
	   measurably more upside in this context.  (How many 1-0 and 2-1
	   games will the Indians need to win?)

The only drawback I see for the Indians is the need to obtain/develop a
"Mr. Clutch" for when Martinez and Hershiser are gone.  McDowell may or may
not be it.  Hershiser has that certain something - a couple of years ago,
the guy was ready for the scrap heap, and late last year, he was *incredibly*
tough.

They're in great shape if Ogea or Tavarez develops into that kind of pitcher -
but I'll tell you right now, Albie Lopez won't...
63.1749ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Fri Dec 15 1995 17:294
63.1750USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Dec 15 1995 18:2623
>    Can any one of the clowns who claim McDowell's a 4-5 ERA pitcher,
>    supply the statistical proof for this?
    
>    1990  3.82  14- 9
>    1991  3.41  17-10
>    1992  3.18  20-10  
>    1993  3.37  22-10
>    1994  3.73  10- 9
>    1995  3.93  15-10
    
>    Can someone show me where Jack McDowell has *EVER* had an ERA over
>    4.00 ERA for a season, let alone the 5.00 number one genius is
>    reporting.  Must just be sour grapes.


Sour grapes ?  You obviously didn't read my note in its entirety, did you.
I said he's a perfect fit for Cleveland, but that they'd get in the playoffs
without him, and that he's not a Hershiser-type in the big game.

As for the 4-5 ERA, that means "between 4 and 5".  Check the pattern
of your own stats above.  He finished below 4.00 this year, but that
was with the help of a great finish.  He was well above 4 most of the
year.  He'll be above 4 this year, but it won't matter with that offense.
63.1751USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Dec 15 1995 18:3119
>> Cleveland gets into the post-season with or without McDowell, and
>> he's not that good that he's going to win big games in the post-season
>> (ala Hershiser).  So it's like, "why bother" ? 
    
>    Gotta admit that this is quite a reversal, Joe.  I'd been singing this
>    tune but a couple of short months ago it was supposedly McDowell and
>    Cone that were going to propel the Yankees to a pennant, those
>    "big game" pitchers in a short series...

Selective memory Glenn ?  You said he wasn't that great when we got him,
then when he finished strong you wrote a retraction yourself.

Based on his Aug-Sep finish, I believe I was justified in thinking he
and Cone would give the Yanks a strong 1-2 in the playoffs.  Now, after
seeing him get hammered by Seattle, it would be foolish of me to think of
him as a "big game" pitcher, wouldn't it.

Of course, he had some injury problems at the end, so maybe that affected
his performance.
63.1752USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Dec 15 1995 18:347
>    The best of the lot of Indians pitchers will be Jaret Wright or Bartolo
>    Colon.  Ogea and Tavarez can fight it out for the #3, #4 slot.  Of
>    course, Ogea would be the #1 guy on the Sox.

Grono, explain to me how these guys are going to develop into ANY KIND OF
ML pitcher when Martinez, Hershiser, McDowell and Nagy occupy 4/5's of the
rotation.  It ain't gonna happen in the 'pen.
63.1753ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Dec 15 1995 18:436
    
    Actually, JoeG, in the pen is just where Earl Weaver believed young
    pitchers _should_ be developing - and I don't see any particular
    reason to dispute that...
    
    Joe
63.1754USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Dec 15 1995 18:4611
>    Actually, JoeG, in the pen is just where Earl Weaver believed young
>    pitchers _should_ be developing - and I don't see any particular
>    reason to dispute that...

Being a "fact guy", I find it amusing that you believe something
just because Earl Weaver believed it.

It would seem to me that a young pitcher needs to throw as many
innings as he can, using all his "stuff".  Relief appearances
are so situational and restricting that I can't see how a young
kid could "develop".
63.17553-ring materialOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Dec 15 1995 18:526
63.1756ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Dec 15 1995 19:1042
    
>>    Actually, JoeG, in the pen is just where Earl Weaver believed young
>>    pitchers _should_ be developing - and I don't see any particular
>>    reason to dispute that...

>Being a "fact guy", I find it amusing that you believe something
>just because Earl Weaver believed it.

    I don't believe it because Earl Weaver believed it.  I consider it
    worth considering because Weaver has a sharp understanding of baseball
    (eschewing such strategies as the sac bunt in favor of the "three run
     home run" - that is, walks and power).  And the data I've seen
    suggests that pitchers who pitch too much when young burn out early.
    Given that, and given the success Weaver had with his strategy, it's
    one I'd probably try if I was a manager.  But, as I said, it's just
    a strategy I haven't seen any particular reason _not_ to use, not
    one I'd actively champion.
    
>It would seem to me that a young pitcher needs to throw as many
>innings as he can, using all his "stuff".
    
    It's the "as many innings as he can" that causes problems.  Look
    at most top notch pitchers - with rare exception, they weren't
    forced to pitch too much (particularly when tired) at a young
    age.
    
    It's the reason, btw, that I wouldn't bet on great things from
    Isringhausen and Pulsipher on the Mets - Green was doing his
    _best_ to cause their arms to fall off.  It's something we won't
    know for certain about for 5 years or so - but I bet that by that
    time, they'll both be looked at as major disappointments _unless_
    they stop getting overused very soon.
    
>Relief appearances
>are so situational and restricting that I can't see how a young
>kid could "develop".
    
    Not knowing how pitchers "develop", I can't answer this - but it
    seems to me that facing major league batters is the primary element
    needed, and I'm not certain beyond that that it matters a whole lot.
    
    Joe
63.1757SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Dec 15 1995 19:3623
RE                    <<< Note 63.1752 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>Grono, explain to me how these guys are going to develop into ANY KIND OF
>ML pitcher when Martinez, Hershiser, McDowell and Nagy occupy 4/5's of the
>rotation.  It ain't gonna happen in the 'pen.

  Right now the Indians are not in building mode they are in trying to win it
all mode. The value of their players is not measured in how well they may be
some day, it's measured in what they can contribute right now. For young guys
that means working out of the bull pen keeping them in games and to heck with
how they develop in the future. Also with 3 of the 4 top starters being
somewhat long of tooth the young guys provide backup to hold the Indians over
in the event of an injury until the older guys get back or a free agent can be
brought in. 

  This is a good move by the Indians, just what they need to keep their chances
alive. If there is one place that rust is beginning to show in this team it's
with that old starting rotation. Adding McDowell increases their chances of
having quality starters available throughout the year. As for playoffs, it
gives them a solid starting point going in to mid summer. They can add the
necessary hired guns in late August if needed. 

  George 
63.1758CSLALL::BRULEcountry in need of a leaderMon Dec 18 1995 12:3815
    
   > Actually, JoeG, in the pen is just where Earl Weaver believed young
   > pitchers _should_ be developing - and I don't see any particular
   > reason to dispute that...
    
   >Joe
    Joe I couldn't agree more with this. The Indians will probably be in
    the playoffs for the next 3-5 years. Why put a young pitcher in the
    rotation and have them exposed to the pressures of having to win every
    5 days? Let them do some middle relief and pitch when their teams are
    either way ahead or behind. Then when a spot starter is needed they can
    start. I can remember Flanagan and other O's would get their feet wet
    for a year and then they get put in.
    
    Mike
63.1759USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Dec 18 1995 16:2912
You guys are something...My comment was made after Groaner said that
Cleveland had a number of young pitchers (on the ML roster or at AAA)
that could develop into *TOP* ML starters.  We're not talking about
the average Joe-shmo pitcher.  If these guys are that good, they
shouldn't be wasted as mop-up men, or situational guys out of the
'pen.  Maddux and Clemens didn't start that way...and I don't think
a lot of early-career innings has hurt them.  Even guys like Langston
are still chugging along as effective starters.

There a lot to be said for experience as a starter, and I'm just questioning
(Groaner) how these Cle kids are going to get this experience over (at
least) the next 2 years.
63.1760ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Dec 18 1995 16:5041
    
>If these guys are that good, they
>shouldn't be wasted as mop-up men, or situational guys out of the 'pen.
    
    And that's what we're disagreing with.
    
>Maddux and Clemens didn't start that way...
    
    That's correct.  I don't think anyone claimed that starting in relief
    is _necessary_ for success.
    
>and I don't think a lot of early-career innings has hurt them.
    
    Actually, I don't think either _threw_ a lot of early-career innings,
    though I could be wrong.  I'm fairly certain that Clemens was 21 when
    signed, and 25 or nearly so when he started piling on innings.  I'm
    not sure, but I don't remember Maddux putting up lots of innings
    before 1990 (age 24).
    
    In any case, heavy early workloads doesn't _necessarily_ lead to
    later problems.  However, it _usually_ does.  Look at other pitchers
    who had heavy workloads regularly before age 25 - Gooden and Saberhagen
    come to mind; both had very heavy workloads, with great success, before
    they turned 25.  Now, they're average pitchers, with Saberhagen having
    a significant injury history.
    
>Even guys like Langston are still chugging along as effective starters. 
    
    It can happen.  I personally have no problem with _starting_ a young
    pitcher, so long as the pitch count and his endurance are very
    carefully monitored and acted upon.  Relieving tends to have this
    tendency naturally built in, while providing more opportunity for
    success than for failure.
    
    I guess the most important question, though, is: can a pitcher build
    a successful career as a starter when initially working out of the
    bullpen?  And, can starting in the bullpen hinder a pitcher's
    development?  I believe the answers are "Yes" and "Not often", so
    I have no problem with the Indians doing it...
    
    Joe
63.1761SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Dec 18 1995 17:129
  Maddux and Clemens are bad examples. Both started on teams who were not one
of the top 2 or 3 teams to beat at the time. Both were needed as starters when
they came up. 

  Here the situation is different. Teams like the Indians and Braves have all
the horses they need so any new guys will have to wait their turn. Their
development is a low priority compared to winning with what they've got.

  George
63.1762what bandwagon is george on for the super bowl?ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Jan 03 1996 18:182
63.1763IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Jan 03 1996 18:293
Welcome back, Groaner.  I miss your carefully constructed questions.  You
are a true artiste.  :-)
63.1764USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jan 03 1996 18:491
Sorrento signed with Seattle today.
63.1765GLRMAI::FINIZIOWed Jan 03 1996 19:295
    
    
    	Good Pickup for seattle....they basically traded Martinez, Nelson,
    	and Blowers for Sorento, Davis, and Hitchcock....
    
63.1766sox 75 years of futility!ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Thu Jan 04 1996 02:034
63.1767Clev. and Atla the Dallas-SF of baseball?AKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustThu Jan 04 1996 13:195
    Groaner, has it come down to Cleveland adding players to beat Atlanta
    similar to Dallas and San Fran in football?  They could have used
    Franco against Glavine and Avery big time if he has his '94 form.
    
    Now what do they do in the games with no dh?  Franco at third?
63.1768ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jan 04 1996 14:1218
    
>    Now what do they do in the games with no dh?  Franco at third?
    
    Why in the world would you sub for the best 3B in the game?
    
    Franco will be playing 1B part time anyway; with no DH, if will
    be:
    
    1B: Franco
    2B: Baerga
    SS: Vizquel
    3B: Thome
    LF: Belle
    CF: Lofton
    RF: Ramirez
    C: Alomar (when he's healthy)
    
    Joe
63.1769AKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustThu Jan 04 1996 14:3214
    Sorry I assummed Franco was brought in at DH with Murray primary at 1b.
    
    Joe, I'm talking about world series only and what to do about Glavine
    and Avery who beat you three times last fall.  If you're not doing
    something about that then you better hope that Hargrove is.
    
    Those stats of yours and George's and Mr Elias etal aren't going to be
    much help although if Thome plays all 162 including Petitte,Key,Johnson
    and the California crew and can hit lefties then that stat will help.
    
    The thought just came to me.  Are you in fact criticizing Hargrove for
    benching Thome in the first two losses vd the l'handers?  I hadn't
    heard it before and don't recall anyone else pushing for Thome to be
    there in game 6.  Perhaps you did make that call.
63.1770ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Thu Jan 04 1996 14:385
63.1771SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Thu Jan 04 1996 17:4915
    
    re .1770,
    
    	Thats assumming that Cleveland even makes it to the world series.
    
    :^)
    
    
    
    
    	They will be the pre-season favorites to win the American league.
    So the pressure is on they are SUPPOSE to win. Anything less then a
    WS victory is a CHOKE job.  :^)
    
    Ron
63.1772ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jan 04 1996 17:5425
    
>    The thought just came to me.  Are you in fact criticizing Hargrove for
>    benching Thome in the first two losses vd the l'handers?
    
    Yes.  Not specifically, I guess - my criticism of Hargrove benching
    Thome is more general than that.  IMHO, Thome should only be sit when
    he's being given a day off - Hargrove can confine that to lefthanders
    if he wants, but there's no reason to sit Thome for Espinoza save to
    give him a day's rest.  Thome is so much better a hitter _vs lefties_
    than Espinoza as to make a platoon ludicrous.
    
>    I hadn't
>    heard it before and don't recall anyone else pushing for Thome to be
>    there in game 6.  Perhaps you did make that call.
    
    I might not have said it in here - I have been against Thome's
    benchings all along, though.
    
    Hargrove has some good characteristics as a manager - he doesn't bunt
    or use the intentional walk much, and he's got an excellent record
    developing young players.  He even seems to be making in-roads in
    developing young pitchers.  But he also makes some really dumb
    decisions.
    
    Joe
63.1773ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerMon Feb 19 1996 13:506
63.1774USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 19 1996 16:403
>    Good move by the Indians in picking up Brian Anderson.

He'll probably be their ACE by mid-season.
63.1775ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Feb 19 1996 17:1327
    
>>    Good move by the Indians in picking up Brian Anderson.

>He'll probably be their ACE by mid-season.
    
    Um, how do you figure that, Joe?
    
    For Anderson to be the best starter on the Tribe by mid-season,
    he'd have to pass up:
    
    Hershiser
    Martinez
    Nagy
    Ogea
    McDowell
    Lopez
    Tavarez
    maybe Clark (Anderson might already be ahead in that comparison)
    
    I just don't see it.  I wouldn't rule out the possibility, but Anderson
    would have to take a big leap forward, and I don't expect that this
    year.  Despite your dire predictions, I don't think the Tribe's in
    particularly bad shape pitching-wise this year.  Hart _knows_ that
    Hershiser and Martinez are on their last legs; I would be very
    surprised if he lets more than one top notch prospect go...
    
    Joe
63.1776USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 19 1996 18:2116
>    Um, how do you figure that, Joe?

>    Hershiser
>    Martinez
>    Nagy
>    Ogea
>    McDowell


It's a joke JoeH...a follow-up to a prediction I made a week or so ago
that the Indians' starting rotation may have problems through the 1st
half of the season.  I've never thought much of Nagy (OK, nothing great),
and McDowell would have been crowned Ed Whitson II based on his pre-All
Star Break performance.  Who knows if Ogea repeats.  Martinez...how far
can guts alone carry him ?  That leaves Hershiser to carry them (just like
in last year's post-season !!)
63.1777ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Feb 19 1996 18:5831
    
> I've never thought much of Nagy (OK, nothing great),
    
    OK, I'll buy that.  Before his injury he did appear to be a step
    better than that, but I wouldn't argue that he's been anything
    better than good since then.

>and McDowell would have been crowned Ed Whitson II based on his pre-All
>Star Break performance.  
    
    You're underrating McDowell; not surprising, considering how
    overrated he was, but still not equitable.  McDowell's still a
    very good pitcher; he just never was a truly great one.
    
>    Who knows if Ogea repeats.  
    
    My guess is that he will; he's _never_ failed in pro ball.  He's
    had varying degrees of success, true - but I don't see any reason
    to believe he'll be worse than Anderson in '96.
    
>    Martinez...how far can guts alone carry him ?  
    
    My guess is that Martinez will be a half-time pitcher this year.
    Anything more than that's gravy.
    
>    That leaves Hershiser to carry them (just like in last year's 
>    post-season !!)
    
    Could happen; I doubt it will, though.
    
    Joe
63.1778IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Feb 20 1996 11:4111
>    Good move by the Indians in picking up Brian Anderson.  Anderson is a
>    lefty, he was the third pick in the draft and was probably rushed by 
>    the Angels.  He'll probably get sent to AAA to start the season. 
>    Cleveland basically gave up ZERO to get him.  Anderson forced the
>    Angels to make a move.

Groaner, I thought of you when I saw this in the transaction column.  A
*great* pickup by the Indians.  You can get rid of the "probably" in
"probably rushed" - the Angels were desperate and didn't give him time to
develop.  This was one of the moves necessary to plug the holes caused by
the eventual departure of Martinez and Hershiser.
63.1779ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerWed Feb 28 1996 12:193
63.1780August 23, 1996CNTROL::CHILDSHarry Browne for President!Wed Feb 28 1996 12:231
63.1781Another Contest?ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsWed Feb 28 1996 12:344
    October 28, 1996 - Indians lose to the Braves in Game 5 of the WS. 
    Braves win WS AGAIN.
    
    UMDan
63.1782OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Feb 28 1996 13:211
63.1783neverOLD1S::CADZILLA2Field Service Tool PusherWed Feb 28 1996 13:361
    
63.1784ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Feb 28 1996 13:514
    
    August 22nd.
    
    Joe
63.1785IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Feb 29 1996 11:453
September 10th.  Chicago rebounds and KC is surprisingly tough.  Indians
still smoke them both - they're too deep.
63.1786ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Feb 29 1996 12:4612
    
> Chicago rebounds 
    
    How?  With Phillips, I _might_ be able to buy the Sox as at least vague
    contenders, but now?  They've got Thomas, Ventura, a few pitchers who
    need to bounce back and/or step forward, and little else.
    
> and KC is surprisingly tough.
    
    This I can buy.
    
    Joe
63.1787June-something...USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 29 1996 12:551
What day will the Indians trade a super prospect to get starting pitching ?
63.1788MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Feb 29 1996 12:559
>> Chicago rebounds 
>    
>    How?  With Phillips, I _might_ be able to buy the Sox as at least vague
>    contenders, but now?  They've got Thomas, Ventura, a few pitchers who
>    need to bounce back and/or step forward, and little else.


   As you mentioned, the pitching will rebound.  I don't expect Jason Bere to
   have the kind of season he had last year, do you ?  That's one example.
63.1789IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Feb 29 1996 13:135
I didn't mean to start a discussion - it was just a short justification
for why my guess was later than the other guys'.

Rich basically summed up my take on it.  And you forget about Lance Johnson
like he's a spare part - he's a nice player.
63.1790ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Feb 29 1996 14:1323
    
>I didn't mean to start a discussion - it was just a short justification
>for why my guess was later than the other guys'.
    
    It just struck me as an odd idea.
    
>Rich basically summed up my take on it.  And you forget about Lance Johnson
>like he's a spare part - he's a nice player.
    
    Assuming Lance Johnson is a nice player (I disagree; IMHO, while he's
    not useless, he doesn't walk enough to really contribute offensively),
    what good does it do the Sox?  Johnson's on the Mets.
    
    And Raines is with the Yankees.
    
    I see the pitching for the Sox improving (while I'm unconvinced about
    Bere, I expect some 2 or 3 of the Sox starters to be better this year),
    but the offense slipping (unless, maybe, Snopek starts and Guillen
    sits, which I don't think will happen), for an overall slightly
    positive effect upon their record - which isn't nearly enough to keep
    them close.
    
    Joe
63.1791IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Feb 29 1996 14:165
>    Assuming Lance Johnson is a nice player (I disagree; IMHO, while he's
>    not useless, he doesn't walk enough to really contribute offensively),
>    what good does it do the Sox?  Johnson's on the Mets.

DOH!
63.1792Death, taxes, and Big Frank...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelThu Feb 29 1996 14:187
    White Sox are indeed on the slide... but baseball being baseball,
    pitching being pitching, Frank Thomas being Frank Thomas; as 
    Joaquin Andujar would summarize in just one word, youneverknow...
    
    glenn
    
63.1793ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerThu Feb 29 1996 15:2015
63.1794CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Feb 29 1996 15:216
  Rumor I heard was that Jason Bere would get a look in spring training but
there's a good chance he'll start the season in AAA.

  Alverez looked better 2nd half than 1st so maybe he's coming around.

  George
63.1795ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerThu Feb 29 1996 15:224
63.1796CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Feb 29 1996 15:376
  Question is, are they a future champion or a future Vikings/Broncos/Bills?

  "" #2 "" 

  George
63.1797A's and Detroit come ot mindCSLALL::BRULESNOW SUCKSThu Feb 29 1996 16:245
    Cleveland's second 5 starting pitchers are better then a couple of
    teams first 5. When Martinez, Hersheiser and McDowell are gone in 2
    years they shouldn't miss a beat.
    
    mike 
63.1798That's whoAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Feb 29 1996 17:482
    Cleveland traded our local kid they played at first last year, name
    escapes me.  Who's on first this year for the tribe other than Murray?
63.1799ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Feb 29 1996 18:074
    
    Franco and Perry.
    
    Joe
63.1800IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Feb 29 1996 18:261
local kid == Sorrento
63.1801ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerThu Feb 29 1996 18:574
63.1802AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Feb 29 1996 19:027
    Well Groaner since you're not a stat man that has to be observation. 
    Is this range or propensity for errors.  Generally, lefties are good
    fielders at first base, generalization fer sure but I've rarely seen an
    exception.
    
    Franco as a former ss, 2b should I grant be able to play and is that
    the Perry that played for Atlanta circa 1991,1992?
63.1803USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 29 1996 19:103
Why is that people expect Franco to be a good ML hitter at his age ?
Didn't he pretty-much suck in his last stint, before going to Japan ?
JoeH, you must have some stats that identify a trend here....
63.1804ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerThu Feb 29 1996 19:1111
63.1805ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerThu Feb 29 1996 19:133
63.1806MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Feb 29 1996 19:205
	Franco will be better offensively than Sorrento, but he won't be
	any better defensively.

	In any rate, look for Herbert Perry to win the first base job
	by the end of the year (no more platooning).
63.1807Cleveland clinches 9/19 BTWMIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Feb 29 1996 19:2311
>    <<< Note 63.1794 by CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" >>>
>
>  Rumor I heard was that Jason Bere would get a look in spring training but
>there's a good chance he'll start the season in AAA.

 Why would a guy on the all-star team two years ago get only a "look" in
 spring training ?  He was bad last year, but he still has a live aram (IMO),
 and is unlikely to be at AAA when the season starts.

 If someone like Bere is sent to the AAA level, then Chicago may not have a
 realistic wild-card chance.
63.1808AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Feb 29 1996 19:2613
    I was hoping to find a chink in the armor.  Franco was very good at
    Chicago and was a key to freeing up the Big Hurt for a big year.  Alas,
    you have indeed gotten better except for (where's that straw when I
    need it) the lefty / righty thing.
    
    Well if you don't shore up the pitching I definitely see 50 losses this
    year.  Actually a short series vs rested pitching and your own staff
    overworked especially against two top of the line lefthanders is about
    the only gambit that could or did stop Cleveland.  Hart has now gone a
    long way with Franco in repairing that "chink".
    
    Did I read the Braves thinking about messing around with Avery? 
    Without Avery they probably would have lost the series.
63.1809IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Feb 29 1996 19:3312
>    Franco >> Sorrento both offensively and defensively.

I know Sorrento is no Mattingly at 1B, but is he that bad/Franco that good?
Logic says that a former middle infielder *should* be good around the first
base bag, but I don't know that for a fact.

He'll hit for a much better average than Sorrento, with less home run punch.
But on the Tribe, that shouldn't be an issue.

From what little I saw, Perry seems to be the same sort of hitter as Franco -
plenty of extra base power, excellent average, but not really big home run
numbers.  He's a good looking player...
63.1810ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsThu Feb 29 1996 19:424
    re. Avery - The Braves aren't doing anything that I'm aware of,
    although he did win his arbitration case this year.  
    
    UMDan
63.1811ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Feb 29 1996 19:4210
    
>Why is that people expect Franco to be a good ML hitter at his age ?
>Didn't he pretty-much suck in his last stint, before going to Japan ?
>JoeH, you must have some stats that identify a trend here....
    
    Actually, if you throw out 1992 (when he was injured, and only
    managed 107 at bats), Franco's been fairly consistent, and always
    very good.
    
    Joe
63.1812ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Feb 29 1996 19:459
    
    Re: Franco's defense
    
    About the only evidence we have in either direction is the fact
    that Franco won a Gold Glove in Japan last year.
    
    Which probably indicates that he's not _bad_, at a minimum.
    
    Joe
63.1813JO-EEEEEEEE-YYBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredThu Feb 29 1996 21:116

	Joey Belle fined $50K for cussin' at Hannah Storm.  Biggest fine ever
	in MLB.  The guy was a jerk in Colorado Springs and still is.

	Kevin
63.1814ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerThu Feb 29 1996 22:416
63.1815AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherFri Mar 01 1996 09:545
    
    
     He has already appealed the fine and I guess is waitin for it to be
    settled.  Paul is right Belle is a complete ASS but without a doubt
    I'd want him on my team as opposed to pitch to him.
63.1816CSLALL::BRULESNOW SUCKSFri Mar 01 1996 11:284
    Paul your half right. Belle isn't appealing but the Indians are going
    to pay the fine.
    
    mike
63.1817ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerFri Mar 01 1996 11:403
63.1818USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Mar 01 1996 12:575
>	Joey Belle fined $50K for cussin' at Hannah Storm.

As I remember it, he cussed at ALL reporters in the dugout.  Why is
that Hannah (ie: female) is the only one to bring these charges ?
Why weren't the male reporters offended ?
63.1819"They all look alike"-- great line on WEEI yesterdayEDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelFri Mar 01 1996 14:0510
    
> As I remember it, he cussed at ALL reporters in the dugout.
    
    No, by the accounts I've seen, Belle directed profane, female-specific
    slurs at Storm.  Only problem was that Belle "thought" that Storm
    was Lesley Visser in disguise.  Sorry Joey, you don't get points
    for delusional perception problems...
    
    glenn
     
63.1820IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Mar 01 1996 15:012
If it were the insipid Lesley Visser, it would be almost forgivable.
Not the female-specific slurs, just the general ones.
63.1821Ever in the right shall [BC's] sons (and daughters) be foundAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellFri Mar 01 1996 15:244
    There you go panning BC again Roland: first me, then the Glove now the
    lovely and talent Leslie Visser Stockton.
    
    One word about Charlie O'Rourke and I'm coming over there ^
63.1822ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Mar 14 1996 12:2515
    
    It appears that Hargrove has settled upon the following batting
    order...
    
    Lofton - Vizquel - Baerga - Belle - Murray - Franco - Thome - Ramirez -
    Alomar.
    
    Perhaps the most interesting thing about this lineup (as pointed out
    on rec.sport.baseball) is that the Indians could expect to score (a
    few) more runs by running this order _backwards_.
    
    I really like Grover, but I also really wish he'd put together a
    reasonable order...
    
    Joe
63.1823CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Mar 14 1996 12:324
  They could run those guys inside out and they'd still lead the league.

  George
63.1824ROCK::GRONOWSKISPORTS 1995 NOTY &amp; RED_SOX Most Knowledgeable Noter Award!Thu Mar 14 1996 16:094
63.1825'Course it won't matter all that much, but...PCBUOA::MORGANThu Mar 14 1996 19:195
    I would agree with what's been said so far.  Wouldn't you want to get
    Thome and Ramirez more AB's than Vizquel, or even Murray?  This would
    be a foolish batting order if it is, in fact, what will be used.
    
    					Steve
63.1826MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Mar 14 1996 19:2710
>    Lofton - Vizquel - Baerga - Belle - Murray - Franco - Thome - Ramirez -
>    Alomar.

     This lineup was so poor last year for Cleveland.

     It seems to be a classic lineup.  Good speed leading off.  Good bat control
     (bunt, hit-and-run) hitting second, to move the lead-off man over.
     Good RBI man with good average hitting 3rd.  Two big sluggers 4th and 5th.
     Good power with somewhat less predictability in the 6th and 7th (and here
     in the 8th as well).  Worst hitter hitting 9th.
63.1827IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Mar 14 1996 19:3413
It's the happy dilemma of too much hitting talent.

The probable reason(s) for Vizquel in the #2 slot are his ability to move
the runner over, and the ability to run Lofton without taking the bat out
of the hands of a slugger.

Sure, you'd like to move Thome and Ramirez up, but what do you do with
Eddie "I had 2 RBI before breakfast" Murray?

You could try moving Vizquel to #9 and slide everyone up a notch.  Problem
is that hitting is a Baerga strength, but plate discipline isn't.  But having
Valentin hit #2 works OK for the Red Sox, maybe the same applies to Baerga and
the Tribe.
63.1828ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Mar 14 1996 19:3931
    
>>    Lofton - Vizquel - Baerga - Belle - Murray - Franco - Thome - Ramirez -
>>    Alomar.

>     This lineup was so poor last year for Cleveland.

    Thankfully, batting order makes relatively little difference.
    
>     It seems to be a classic lineup.  Good speed leading off.  Good bat 
>    control (bunt, hit-and-run) hitting second, to move the lead-off man over.
    
    Of course, you score more runs if you have the high-OBP lead off...
    
>     Good RBI man with good average hitting 3rd.  Two big sluggers 4th and 5th.
>     Good power with somewhat less predictability in the 6th and 7th (and here
>     in the 8th as well).  Worst hitter hitting 9th.
    
    ???
    
    The worst hitter is clearly Vizquel; Alomar's 2nd worst.
    
    The guys who get on base the most often, and who therefore should
    be coming up _before_ guys like Eddie Murray who knock 'em in, but
    don't leave themselves on, and Thome and Ramirez, who are hitting
    7th and 8th.
    
    Over the course of the season, Vizquel will get ~50 more at bats
    than Ramirez.  Why in the _world_ would you want to take 50 at
    bats away from Ramirez or Thome and give them to Vizquel?
    
    Joe
63.1829IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Mar 14 1996 19:454
>Why in the _world_ would you want to take 50 at
>    bats away from Ramirez or Thome and give them to Vizquel?

As a reward for making the pitchers look better?  :-)
63.1830Swindelled?TNPUBS::ALVEYmy head won't leave my head aloneMon Apr 01 1996 19:106
    Tribe moved Mark Clark to da Mets yesterday
    for RHP Reid Cornelius and OF Ryan Thompson.
    Anybody got the poop on these guys?
    
    dr.a
    
63.1831CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Apr 01 1996 19:1612
    

  CLE Indians Pitchers W  L   G GS CG GF SH SV   IP    H   R  ER HR  BB  SO
  Mark Clark           9  7  22 21  2  0  0  0 124.2 143   0  73 13  42  68

  NYM Mets Batters      G  AB   R   H  TB  D  T HR RBI  BB  SO  SB CS  E
  Ryan Thompson        75 267  39  67 101 13  0  7  31  19  77   3  1  3

  NORFOLK TIDES (AAA)  W  L    ERA   G SV  IP     H   R  ER  BB  SO
  Cornelius, Reid      8  1   1.67  14  0  81.0  73  22  15  24  50

  George
63.1832MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Mon Apr 01 1996 19:2210
Ryan Thompson came to the Mets with Jeff Kent from Toronto
in the David Cone trade.  He has shown some pop with the bat,
but is prone to strikeouts.  He was squeezed out of the Mets
outfield plans, both short and long term.

Cornelius is a minor leaguer that just got sent down.  I think
the Mets may have gotten him from the Braves at some point, but
I'm not sure about that.

Mike
63.1833IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Apr 01 1996 19:238
Clark took a big step forward two years ago, and a small one backward
last year.

Thompson is a superstar in his own mind - although I'd be worried if I were
Jeromy Burnitz...

Cornelius was nothing spectacular in the little I saw of him with the Mets
last year.
63.1834MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Mon Apr 01 1996 19:264
A search of Alta Vista shows that Cornelius came from
the Expo organization in the David Sequi trade.

Mike
63.1835damn...there goes undefeated seasonTNPUBS::ALVEYmy head won't leave my head aloneWed Apr 03 1996 11:452
    Tribe loses opener 7-1 to Cone/Yankees
    
63.1837USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Apr 03 1996 19:027
>    Get your digs in now, when Cleveland's winning at a .700 clip, the
>    jokes will stop.

.700 was a very rare feat.  Pulling it off back-to-back is doubtful.
I keep saying it, watch your pitching staff.  MLB pitching is so
fragile these days, and your mainstays are old.  One of two injuries
and you're Boston Red Sox-Central.
63.1839Flash Gordan = fireCSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastThu Apr 04 1996 12:225
    I'm sure the Red sox wouldn't mind some of Cleveland's second 5 not to 
    mention Colon and Wright. Although hopefully Suppan, Orellano, Murray
    and Eshelman will help them.
    
    Mike
63.1840ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RThu Apr 04 1996 13:4712
>    chance.  Cleveland could have two of their starters go down and not
>    lose anything.  Remember, McDowell is an addition to the staff this 
>    year.

     McDowell stinks.

     If Cleveland could replace their #1 and #2 pitchers with pitchers 
     currently in the minors, and not lose anything, that means that either
     (a) those two replacement pitchers really should be in the majors as the
     #3 and #4 starters in the rotation, or (b) Cleveland's top 7 starters
     are absolutely equal and it's just a coin flip to determine who stays
     and who goes.
63.1842It's a shared opinionXTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 04 1996 14:174
MCdowell does suck. He has a lousy ERA he was just lucky enough to be on a team
that score 6+ runs a game for him when he posted his high winning %%%%......

When the Yanks need him the most he choked! Case closed......
63.1843SNAX::ERICKSONThu Apr 04 1996 14:576
    
    	McDowell is a definite step down from Ken Hill but I wouldn't
    put him in the suck category yet. He is an above average pitcher on
    the down side of his career.
    
    Ron
63.1844No he's notXTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 04 1996 15:050
63.1845BIGQ::MCKAYThu Apr 04 1996 15:074
    Ron I guess you don't get it.  If Mikey says the guy sips he's
    probably the MVP of the staff..... 8*)
    
    Jimbo
63.1846That's why I've never said you sip Jimbo ;^)XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 04 1996 15:080
63.1848He's on my team so now I love himSTRATA::BTOWERThu Apr 04 1996 15:182
    Grono, If Mcdowell had not joined the Tribe, would you still want to
    sleep with him? 8>). Or maybe it's because he's a stiff..............
63.1849ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Apr 04 1996 15:285
    
    Actually, Paul's been a fan of McDowell's for years; I'll vouch
    for that.
    
    Joe
63.1850ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RThu Apr 04 1996 15:3718
63.1852Last years startersCSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastThu Apr 04 1996 16:5799
I'll take McDowell on my team anyday. Here's last years ML pitchers with
    more then 20 starts sorted by ERA
    
    
                      W  ERA   Ratio  W  L  G   GS  CG
Greg Maddux          19  1.63   0.81 19  2  28  28 10
Randy Johnson        18  2.48   1.05 18  2  30  30  6
Hideo Nomo           13  2.54   1.06 13  6  28  28  4
Butch Henry           7  2.85   1.28  7  9  21  21  1
Andy Ashby           12  2.95   1.26 12 10  31  31  2
Tim Wakefield        16  2.95   1.18 16  8  27  27  6
Ismael Valdes        13  3.06   1.11 13 11  33  27  6
Dennis Martinez      12  3.08   1.18 12  5  28  28  3
Joey Hamilton         6  3.09   1.20  6  9  31  30  2
Tom Glavine          16  3.09   1.25 16  7  29  29  3
John Smoltz          12  3.18   1.24 12  7  29  29  2
Frank Castillo       11  3.21   1.23 11 10  29  29  2
Pete Schourek        18  3.22   1.07 18  7  29  29  2
David Wells          16  3.24   1.22 16  8  29  29  6
Jaime Navarro        14  3.28   1.25 14  6  29  29  1
Mike Mussina         19  3.30   1.07 19  9  32  32  7
Mike Hampton          9  3.36   1.26  9  8  24  24  0
Ken Rogers           17  3.38   1.29 17  7  31  31  3
Denny Neagle         13  3.44   1.27 13  8  31  31  5
Pat Rapp             14  3.45   1.40 14  7  28  28  3
John Smiley          12  3.47   1.20 12  5  28  27  1
Shane Reynolds       10  3.47   1.23 10 11  30  30  3
Pedro Martinez M     14  3.48   1.15 14 10  30  30  2
Tom Candiotti         7  3.50   1.29  7 14  30  30  1
Mike Morgan           7  3.57   1.27  7  7  21  21  1
David Cone           18  3.57   1.24 18  8  30  30  6
Kevin Brown          10  3.61   1.18 10  9  26  26  3
Al Leiter            11  3.64   1.48 11 11  28  28  2
Ramon Martinez       17  3.67   1.25 17  7  30  30  4
Carlos Perez         10  3.70   1.20 10  8  28  23  2
Jim Abbott           11  3.70   1.39 11  8  30  30  4
Mark Gubicza         12  3.76   1.33 12 14  33  33  3
Chris Hammond         9  3.80   1.27  9  6  25  24  3
Alex Fernandez       12  3.81   1.30 12  8  30  30  5
Mark Leiter          10  3.83   1.23 10 12  30  29  7
Orel Hershiser       16  3.88   1.21 16  6  26  26  1
Kevin Appier         15  3.89   1.21 15 10  31  31  4
Jack McDowell        15  3.94   1.33 15 10  30  30  8
Mark Petkovsek        6  4.00   1.25  6  6  26  21  1
Mark Portugal        11  4.02   1.33 11 10  31  31  1
Bobby Witt            5  4.13   1.47  5 11  29  29  2
Jim Bullinger        12  4.14   1.45 12  8  24  24  1
Kent Mercker          7  4.15   1.41  7  8  29  26  0
Andy Pettitte        12  4.17   1.41 12  9  31  26  3
Bret Saberhagen       7  4.18   1.29  7  6  25  25  3
Roger Clemens        10  4.18   1.44 10  5  23  23  0
Bobby Jones          10  4.20   1.34 10 10  30  30  3
Kevin Ritz           11  4.21   1.36 11 11  31  28  0
Chuck Finley         15  4.21   1.40 15 12  32  32  2
Erik Hanson          15  4.25   1.32 15  5  29  29  1
Dave Mlicki           9  4.27   1.34  9  7  29  25  0
John Burkett         14  4.31   1.41 14 14  30  30  4
Felipe Lira           9  4.31   1.42  9 13  37  22  0
Wilson Alvarez        8  4.32   1.51  8 11  29  29  3
Jeff Fassero         13  4.33   1.49 13 14  30  30  1
Roger Pavlik         10  4.38   1.38 10 10  31  31  2
Steve Ontiveros       9  4.39   1.41  9  6  22  22  2
Tom Gordon           12  4.43   1.55 12 12  31  31  2
Greg Swindell        10  4.47   1.43 10  9  33  26  1
Kevin Foster         12  4.52   1.28 12 11  30  28  0
Tim Belcher          10  4.52   1.54 10 12  28  28  1
Charles Nagy         16  4.55   1.43 16  6  29  29  2
Todd Stottlemyre     14  4.56   1.47 14  7  31  31  2
Bob Tewksbury         8  4.60   1.46  8  7  21  21  4
Ken Hill AL          10  4.62   1.51 10  8  30  29  1
Mark Langston        15  4.63   1.38 15  7  31  31  2
Ricky Bones          10  4.63   1.50 10 12  32  31  3
Steve Sparks          9  4.63   1.47  9 11  33  27  3
Paul Quantrill       11  4.67   1.43 11 12  33  29  0
Steve Avery           7  4.68   1.25  7 13  29  29  3
Sterling Hitchco     11  4.71   1.33 11 10  27  27  4
Doug Drabek          10  4.77   1.40 10  9  31  31  2
Andy Benes           11  4.77   1.50 11  9  31  31  1
Paul Wagner           5  4.80   1.49  5 16  33  25  3
Scott Erickson       13  4.82   1.43 13 10  32  31  7
Chris Bosio          10  4.92   1.65 10  8  31  31  0
Darryl Kile           4  4.96   1.47  4 12  25  21  0
Kevin Tapani         10  4.97   1.45 10 13  33  31  3
Pat Hentgen          10  5.12   1.63 10 14  30  30  2
Sean Bergman          7  5.13   1.75  7 10  28  28  1
Steve Trachsel        7  5.17   1.56  7 13  30  29  2
Esteban Loaiza        8  5.17   1.51  8  9  32  31  1
Mark Clark            9  5.29   1.49  9  7  22  21  2
Brad Radke           11  5.32   1.34 11 14  29  28  2
Tyler Green           8  5.33   1.59  8  9  26  25  4
Mike Harkey           8  5.45   1.59  8  9  26  20  1
Kevin Gross           9  5.55   1.58  9 15  31  30  4
Zane Smith            8  5.64   1.52  8  8  24  21  0
Shawn Boskie          7  5.67   1.37  7  7  20  20  1
Terry Mulholland      5  5.80   1.53  5 13  29  24  2
Ron Darling           4  6.23   1.63  4  7  21  21  1
Juan Guzman           4  6.33   1.66  4 14  24  24  3
Jason Bere            8  7.22   1.87  8 15  27  27  1
Mike Moore            5  7.56   1.87  5 15  25  25  1
63.1854Just like my wife, Wants more then I can giveCSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastThu Apr 04 1996 17:139
    Dear Paul,
    I'm just putting the stats out there. If I had the stats for the last 5
    years I'd have put it there. I don't have to adjust NOTHING. To me the
    list shows Black Jack in the top 40% of the ML starting pitchers. To
    say he sucks is B.S. and shows that someone isn't following the game
    very well. 
    
    Hope you have a good day,
    Mike
63.1855CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westThu Apr 04 1996 19:1015
    
    Just Jacks numbers
    
    Year  Team  W   ERA  IP    H  BB  Ratio  SO
    1993  CHI  22  3.37 256.2 261 69  1.286 158
    1994  CHI  10  3.73 181.0 186 42  1.260 127
    1995  NYY  15  3.93 217.2 211 78  1.328 157
    
    Three year trend has him slipping, but still pitching reasonably well. 
    I'd make him the #3 starter for his ability, but move him up to #2 for
    his durability.  Any team in the league would be happy to have him for
    the right price.
    
    Marc
    
63.1856ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Apr 04 1996 20:0013
    
>    Just Jacks numbers
 
    Expanded...
       
    Year  Team  W   ERA  IP    H  BB  Ratio  SO
    1991  CHI  17  3.41 253.2 212 82  1.159 191
    1992  CHI  20  3.18 260.2 247 75  1.235 178
    1993  CHI  22  3.37 256.2 261 69  1.286 158
    1994  CHI  10  3.73 181.0 186 42  1.260 127
    1995  NYY  15  3.93 217.2 211 78  1.328 157
    
    Joe
63.1858Black Jack the Stiff!!XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 04 1996 20:171
It's about time you realized the obvious...........
63.1862ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RFri Apr 05 1996 17:2217
    I haven't replied because I haven't been in here.  Moreover, It'll take
    a couple of days for me to get the info - I do have other things to do.
 
    I still think he stinks (that's the adjective I chose, BTW).
    
>   The other thing that sucks about Black Jack is that he just doesn't
>   pitch enough innings.  He burns out the bullpen.
 
    The guy IS an innings horse - I'll give you that.  Kinda like Tim Wakefield
    in a lot of ways.  He has days where he is sharp, but a lot of days where
    he is awful.  Extremely inconsistent.  Not a guy you want as a #2 starter
    when you are in a pennant race.

    I'd be very happy to see McDowell pitch 3 times in a 7 game post season
    series against a team I was rooting for.
    

63.1863ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RFri Apr 05 1996 17:318
>    All I have to say is... when the season is over and Black Jack
>    is sporting his 23-6 record and in the running for the Cy Young...
>    three words... "told you so!"


     If this happens, I'll be in the crow note.  OTOH, If (as is more likely)
     he is 13 or 14 wins and 11 defeats, I'm sure you'll have made yourself
     scarce.
63.1864You are nuts...WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Apr 05 1996 18:204
    
    
    
         Black Jack is twice the pitcher Wakefield is!
63.1865TNPUBS::ALVEYmy head won't leave my head aloneFri Apr 05 1996 18:473
    yabbut Chappy,
    twice nuthin is still nuthin
    
63.1867CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsSun Apr 07 1996 22:493
  Down to the minors or down with an injury?

  George
63.1868HTHAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Apr 08 1996 10:283
    
    
    George he said done as in cooked.
63.1871CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westMon Apr 08 1996 19:4419
    
    Well I don't actually remember who were pitchers for the Yanks last
    year, but here is some more fun information concerning some pitchers.
    
    Player		W   L   SV  ERA   Ratio  IP
    ------		--  --  --  ---   -----  --
    Jack McDowell	15  10   0  3.93  1.33  217.2
    David Cone    	18   8   0  3.57  1.24  229.1
    Sterling Hitchcock  11  10   0  4.70  1.33  168.1
    Scott Kamieniecki    7   6   0  4.01  1.48   89.2
    Andy Pettitte	12   9   0  4.17  1.41  175.0
    Rick Honeycutt       5   1   2  2.96  1.08   45.2
    John Wetteland       1   5  31  2.93  0.88   61.1
    
    In my eyes, the question now becomes, are we talking just starters or
    any pitcher?  Jack, IMHO, was the #2 starter.
    
    Marc
    
63.1877USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Apr 11 1996 13:1910
>    Can someone post the list of AL pitchers who have won more games in the
>    90's than number 3/4 starter Jack McDowell?

Who gives a ***t Groaner ?  Any moron can talk using historical data.
I'm predicting that he's going to be a 4.+ ERA, barely over .500 pitcher
for the Indians.  He's had better than average defense behind him in at
Chi and NY.  That ain't the case here.  He's been bothered by nagging
injuries over the last couple of years.  At his age, that should continue.
He gives up runs, we know that.  If Cleveland's offense doesn't produce
like it did last year, his numbers will drop.
63.1879He doesn't "suck", but is massively overrated...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelThu Apr 11 1996 15:0115
    Cleveland's offense should support Black Jerk better than either 
    Chicago's or New York's did.  As such, anything short of a 20-win
    season is a "choke".
    
    My main gripe with McDowell is that he's always been very hittable,
    can't blow away the good-hitting teams and isn't particularly good 
    at fooling them, either.  Hence, in the playoffs and big games, 
    teams like Toronto and Seattle have shellacked him.  I challenge 
    the Groaner to produce the names of playoff starters in the last 
    5 years with worse records in championship play, 3 or more starts... 
    Groaner Watch, Day 1...
    
    glenn
     
63.1880He did look good last.STRATA::BTOWERThu Apr 11 1996 15:264
    Only one game, but Black Jack did pitch very well last night. Who won?
    I crashed as the 10th innning started.
    
                                                          Bruce
63.1883Facetiousness will get you nowhere...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelThu Apr 11 1996 15:318
    
>    Glenn's a bonehead, day 1.
    
    I challenge you to prove it, with supporting data!  ;-)
    
    
    glenn
    
63.1884But Jack's not the answer to AtlantaAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Apr 11 1996 15:348
    Baltimore won it in the 10th on a Palmeiro hit 3-2.  I thought Jack
    looked good and had a good fastball.  I don't think anyone believes
    he's a top pitcher like Cone fe but he should deliver just what
    Cleveland wanted for him - a bunch of innings.
    
    But I'd trade McDowell and Ogea straight up for Petitte in a heartbeat,
    numbers to hades.  Cleveland needs that true Lefty stopper to go all
    the way.  But I know, lefty - righty bias is 50s thinking, save it.
63.1885IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Apr 11 1996 16:123
>   But I'd trade McDowell and Ogea straight up for Petitte in a heartbeat,
 
As a GM, you're a hell of a golfer...
63.1886BahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Apr 11 1996 16:153
    
    
       Glen I gotta side with Groaner on this one!! :-)
63.1888Petitte is highly regarded by Las Vegas at any rateAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Apr 11 1996 17:532
    Don't worry Roland the Yanks would never take that trade.  Ramirez and
    Ogea, maybe.  The main point is you can't get that kind of horse cheap.
63.1889IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Apr 11 1996 17:542
Yes, but Vegas is a minor league town...
63.1890WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Apr 11 1996 17:563
    
    
         Not when the A's are in town!!
63.1892Didn't Sox turn down GlavineAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Apr 11 1996 19:468
    the gm that turned that down should be shot not fired.  That's
    information that Hart had better hope get's forgotten.  You are correct
    about the Indians leverage to come - their timing was impeccable in
    having the waggon in place to ensure sellouts to ensure the money to
    keep buy the key fa's.
    
    I know you don't think they need them but who, if any, are the lefty
    starters this year?
63.1893ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Apr 11 1996 19:5517
    
    The Tribe's starters this year are Martinez, McDowell, Hershiser,
    Nagy, and Ogea, all righties.  In the system, Anderson and Whitten
    are the top lefty prospects; Lopez, Wright, and Colon the top
    righty prospects.
    
    Thoughts:
    
    1) When picking starters, I'd take a better righty over a lesser
       lefty every time, even if it means all the starters are right
       handed.  I'd prefer a balance, though, when deciding between
       equals.
    
    2) I like Pettite; I might trade Ogea for him, and I really like 
       Ogea.  But there's no way I'd even consider trading Ramirez for him.
    
    Joe
63.1895CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Apr 12 1996 12:136
  So what's going on with Eric Plunk?

  The paper had his ERA around 27.0. Granted it's early in the year but he
seems to be having problems every time out. Is he fighting an injury?

  George
63.1897SNAX::ERICKSONFri Apr 12 1996 14:224
    
    	Albert Belle turns down a 5 yr, 38 million dollar contract.
    
    Ron
63.1898AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellFri Apr 12 1996 18:527
    It has been pretty much a rule among GMs not to trade Field for
    pitchers dating back to Broglio - Brock and Pappas Robinson.  Of course
    Sox fans rebut with Lyle for Cater, Wilson for Demeter.
    
    Funny that there was a willingness on the Yanks part, seemingly, to
    trade Petitte at one time.  Perhaps Ramirez will be the keeper and
    Belle will go to free agency.
63.1899ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Apr 12 1996 19:454
    
    I'd rather keep Ramirez, if forced to choose.
    
    Joe
63.1901indians vs redsox.....1-0SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansSat Apr 13 1996 20:055
    
    	Can we get a score of the game please???
    
    
    		
63.1902??FABSIX::J_PAGESat Apr 13 1996 20:212
    
      Last i heard it was 9-2 in the 8th.......indians.
63.1903IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Apr 15 1996 13:013
>SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR

It lives!
63.1906SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Apr 16 1996 14:496
    
    
    	WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
    
    		GO TRIBE!
    
63.1908CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Apr 16 1996 15:531
Gawd Paul, I hope yer not holding yer breath or anything....
63.1909MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsTue Apr 16 1996 19:086
	What a shock!  The Indians thump the Red Sox and the trolls
	all come crawling out from under their bridges.



	billl
63.1911IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Apr 22 1996 13:151
George, do you have that "dead horse" sound effect ready?
63.1912CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Apr 22 1996 13:3210
  I've always liked Jack McDowell so somehow my heart isn't in cranking up the
horse sound. Maybe I just like pitchers who play guitar or maybe it is because
he was good to one of my Rotisserie teams for a few years.

  One thing for sure, when he left Chicago the rest of the White Sox pitching
staff seemed to lose track of the strike zone completely. No one has been able
to step up as staff Ace since McDowell left.

  George
63.1913IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Apr 22 1996 13:588
>  I've always liked Jack McDowell so somehow my heart isn't in cranking up the
>horse sound.

Jack McDowell isn't the problem... :-)

Got to give him credit - I don't believe I've *ever* seen him have a start
like this.  You knew he'd pick up a bunch of wins, but the low ERA really
surprises me - he's always been a mid- to high-threes kind of guy.
63.1914ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Apr 22 1996 14:425
    
    He probably still _is_ a mid-threes ERA guy, just off to a good start.
    I'll be extremely impressed if his ERA ends up below 3.00...
    
    Joe
63.1916WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 23 1996 16:112
    
    It was....
63.1917WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 23 1996 16:124
    
    
    A Terrible...
    
63.19181918 Snarf!!!! 78 years and countingWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 23 1996 16:138
    
    
    
    YEAR!!!!!!
    
    
    
    
63.1920AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Apr 23 1996 18:503
    
    
     Why don't you guys get a room to swap spit and talk bad about my Sox.
63.1921WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 23 1996 19:066
    
    
        We don't need to thats why we use this forum!! :-)
    
    
    Chap
63.1925WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Apr 25 1996 15:4312
    
    
    GROAn a couple questions for ya. Can you answer them??
    
    1. Who the only team in the AL with a winning record over Cleveland for
    the past two years?
    
    2. Other than Atlanta Who has the best winning percentage at the
    mistake called the Jake?
    
    
    Chap
63.1926XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 25 1996 16:468
man the depths that Yankeeme fans will stoop too to gloss over the abmysal
failures of the Yankees over the last decade and half are amazing.......

Does anyone have Edgar Martinez's playoff stats against the Yanks last year
handy???????

 ;^)
63.1929WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Apr 25 1996 17:2912
    
                Yo Groan.
       I don't wager cash. It's against Digital Policy. Right 'Saw.
    
         Yeah Mike what has your team done in the past 15 years? 78 years?
    
        I asked you about the same wager as last year. Who gets farther but
    you ascared!!
    
    
    
    Chap
63.1930XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 25 1996 17:595
Chappy you have me confused with a Soxs' fan. I root for the Indians although
not with the feverish pitch of Joe, Paul or Hal. Checkout my note in the
introduction note for reference. 

mike
63.1931Mike=RocketmanBIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOThu Apr 25 1996 18:278
    
    The only person Mike Cheers for is his idol...Roger "Rocket" Clemens...
    
    He used to cheer for Wade Boggs till he found out he was a sexaholic
    and left the Beantown Bums for the Yanks.....
    
    **^)  /westy
    
63.1932WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Apr 25 1996 19:0213
    
    
      Ok Mike I'll ask again.
    
    
       What has your team done in the past 15 years. Lots of rings on them
    fingers huh?
    
          I've been civil with you tribe fans (Groaner excluded) so why you
    attack me bro???
    
    
    Chap
63.1933XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 25 1996 19:341
cause I hate the Yankees...........nothing more nothing less
63.1935Alzeimers???? (sp)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Apr 25 1996 20:019
    
    
       Depends how I feel at that precise moment?
    
       What monetary amount did I mention last year? 
    
    
    
    Chap
63.1937GO TRIBE!!!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Apr 26 1996 14:5512
    
    
    	Can someone tell me who won the game between the Tribe and the 
    	Yank'ems???  Some detail would be nice.  Anyone hit a homer?
    	Who got the win?  Who got the loss?  The box score would be
    	nice also.
    
    		Thanks much in advance!
    
    
    
    			W A H O O O O O O O O O O O 
63.1938MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsFri Apr 26 1996 15:156
	Looks like the latest rains have turned over some
	old moldy rocks.



	billl
63.1939SNAX::ERICKSONFri Apr 26 1996 15:235
    
    	Only saw highlights, the Tribe won 4-3 on a Albert Belle solo
    HR in the 8th.
    
    Ron
63.1940CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Apr 26 1996 16:069
Had to love the way that Warner Wolf referred to Albert Belle this morning on 
Imus.  Something like:


	The Indians beat the Yankees on a home run by "The Last Angry
	Man" Albert Belle.


Made me smile, even though I was only half awake....
63.1941not for long!!!BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOFri Apr 26 1996 16:136
    
    Welcome back Hal,  it took a victory over the Yankees to get you back??
    what are they 1-3 vs them this year??  You'll go back in hiding when
    the knicks beat your caviar team???
    
    /westy 
63.1942Pseudo fan extaordinaire!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Apr 26 1996 16:353
    
    
        Climb back under the Rock Hal!!
63.1943SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Apr 26 1996 17:1716
    
    	Boy, look what happens when someone asks a simple question....all
    	the Yank'em lovers come out of the closet.  You can't hold the 
    	Tribe back this year...its only a matter of time.  The hitting
    	is getting better every game.  Looks like Eddie M. has broken out
    	of his slump.  Everyone in the lineup is smacking the ball around.
    	The ump the night before pissed Albert off and he popped it out
    	last night.  The guy is awsome!  Too bad he gets such a bad rap!
    	He just does what each one of us wish we could really do.  Ya know.
    	Someone pisses you off.....throw a ball at em and see if he leaves
    	you alone.  Funny guy!  
    
    	Go Tribe!!!
    
    
    			W A H O O 
63.1944CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Apr 26 1996 17:2911
  Well, the Yankees/Indians battle doesn't really matter at this point. The
Indians should win their division easily and the Yankees are probably the 2nd
most likely team to make the playoffs with either the Eastern division or the
Wild Card. 

  Once they are in the playoffs who knows? That's a relatively short series
a relatively long way away. Maybe even the A.L.C.S. if it works out that way.

  It will be chilly again by the time this battle matters.

  George
63.1945IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Apr 26 1996 17:459
>    	He just does what each one of us wish we could really do.  Ya know.
>    	Someone pisses you off.....throw a ball at em and see if he leaves
>    	you alone.  

I think I'm safe in saying that this is not what "each one of us" wishes we
could really do.

No doubt that the guy is an awesome ballplayer.  But he really needs help
in dealing with all the baggage that comes along with it.
63.1946WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Apr 26 1996 17:557
    
    
       Ya some twelve year old pisses ya off run em down with your car.
    what a humanitarian.
    
    
    Chap
63.1948XTATIC::CHILDSFri Apr 26 1996 18:325
Given his exploits in the field I'd hardly call Albert Belle an awesome
baseball player. Awesome hitter yes, ballplayer no.......

mike
63.19496 - 3 TRIBE OVER THE JAYSSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansSat Apr 27 1996 13:0324
    
    
    	The Tribe wins again........
    
    
    	Oral gets the win in a great effort...something like 8 K's and no
    	walks in 7 innings.
    
    	Jose Mesa gets another save...#8 in 8 tries.
    
    	Everyone is hitting!!!
    
    	Kenny Loften steals another base....something like 16 now.
    
    		Could he steal one a game...
    
    	Franco is going crazy........the hits keep comming!!!
    
    
    	This team will go all the way this year!  There is no stopping
    	the Indians when they are on the war path!
    
    
    		W A H O O 
63.1950IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Apr 29 1996 12:456
>    	Oral gets the win in a great effort...

Hal, are you giving out hidden messages?

Hershiser is amazing - three years ago I thought it was time to stick a
fork in him...
63.1951Petitte could mean championship for tribeAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellMon Apr 29 1996 13:0612
    I see Ogea is back to the bullpen.  Some knucklehead awhile back was
    comparing him to Petitte.  The latter did get taken south by Albert but
    is one of the best in the game.
    
    Given the real knucklehead in charge of the Yankees I'd think the
    Indians would make a run for Petitte since winning the World Series is
    now the major goal and the Tribe has some excellent prospects to offer.
    
    Groaner, make the Yankees an offer they can't refuse - what would you
    trade (for a world series in 1996).
    
    Or do you want to wait another 25 years
63.1952IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Apr 29 1996 13:401
I'm the knucklehead who said he's better than Pettitte.
63.1954IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Apr 29 1996 14:054
Well, you are a knucklehead, but in this particular case, I am the 
knucklehead in question.

Does that clear it up?  :-)
63.1955Always a Yankees fan!!BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOMon Apr 29 1996 14:3711
    
    Groaner, me a Red Sox fan, I'd rather be castrated....I hate the SOX
    When Buckner made the error to blow the game in the series I bought
    drinks for everyone.....I'm offered Sox tickets all the time and refuse
    them, the last 3 times I went to Fenway it was to see the YANKEES and 
    ouch I did go to see CLevescum last year cause the seats were great.
    And they were "FREE".....I even changed my Little League team from the
    White Sox to the Yankees............Yanks fan forever and always....
    
    /westy
    
63.1957CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Apr 29 1996 14:576
FWIW, Knucklehead was a puppet who hung out with Jerry Mahoney.

Paul Winchell was his creator....


That's your trivia tidbit for today....
63.1958I'd have to see it, to believe it!CNTROL::SALMONMon Apr 29 1996 15:405
    re: -1955
    
    Kevin, you bbought drinks?
    
    C'mon!
63.1959IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Apr 29 1996 15:423
>That's your trivia tidbit for today....

"Trivia" is a very appropriate term for it.
63.1960 STRATA::GARRYDallas Cowboys Champs AgainMon Apr 29 1996 16:497
    re.1958
    
    John I'd have to see it to believe it too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    Tom
63.1961JJ & Tom, always order doublesBIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOMon Apr 29 1996 17:0410
    
    Yes..I bought drinks,  Wow you know if you guys didn't order a pitcher
    and drank just a bottle I'd probably buy more.....but you guys would
    cost me a bundle to drink with......
    
    O'groaner, be nice I'm from that wonderful town of CLINTON also and
    proud of it.......
    
    /westy
    
63.1963love it or leave it and you didBIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOMon Apr 29 1996 20:169
    
    But it was full when it went in,  they loved the town so much everyone
    stayed......more than I can say for Cleveland.....you'd probably get
    mugged, robbed or shot if you were in that city.....
    
    No wonder you left, just like the Browns, must be a scumtown.
    
    /westy
    
63.1965love it or leave and you didBIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOTue Apr 30 1996 11:507
    
    First of all, who would want to be there,  the only thing good to come
    from there has been Hal!!!  
    
    He's the true Cleveland fan.......
    
    
63.1967IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue Apr 30 1996 12:2312
Hey!  "Knucklehead" is not a term that should be thrown around lightly...

I hate to get back to the subject, but:

	WHAT HAPPENED TO CHAD OGEA?

The guy is still young and has gone from being a solid pitcher to a guy who
can't get anyone out.  It's not as if he's a junk-baller.  Anyone have a clue?
The only time I've seen him pitch this year is against the Red Sox.

It's not as if he's killing my Rotisserie team because my pitching sips with
or without him...
63.1968Love your stats!!!BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOTue Apr 30 1996 12:267
    
    27 times more friendly,  thats a lie, just ask Albert Belle!!!
    
    He's really friendly......I know must be the eastern shore fans that
    piss him off??
    
    *^/Westy
63.1969WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 30 1996 12:349
    
    
    
       27 times more friendly?
    
        Is that because most of them are related?
    
    
    Chap
63.1970ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Apr 30 1996 12:5013
    
    Re: Ogea
    
    Injured - he went on the DL Sunday.  Given that he wasn't overused
    last year (or this year), I'm not terribly worried about it at
    present.
    
    Re: Belle
    
    Belle is from Louisiana (or Alabama, I'm not sure which), not 
    Cleveland.
    
    Joe
63.1971CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Apr 30 1996 13:4214
I've been to Cleveland.

I wasn't in town long, but while I was it seemed like a nice enough place.

Paul is right, most folks outside of New England area are a little more
friendly (I wouldn't necessarily say 27 times, because every area has its share
of assholes.)

But I've met some awfully friendly folks in New England too.

People are people, no matter where you're from....


'Saw
63.1972EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Apr 30 1996 13:469
> Only problem is, the people in the midwest are about 27
> times more friendly than the people in the East.
    
    Are you our official "midwest" representative?
    
    
    glenn
    
63.1974CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westTue Apr 30 1996 17:5711
    
    Obviously all of our statements are just opinions, but speaking as
    someone who talks to customer from all over the US, Mexico and Canada,
    my opinion is that New York is the worst (we call it 212 tude here at
    the CSC) with both coasts not being overly friendly.  
    
    The middle and south easily have the friendliest people I hear each
    day.
    
    Marc
    
63.1975WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 30 1996 18:1713
    
    
    
        Well I've lived in Mass 25 years (ok) Chicago 8 months (unfriendly)
      Mississippi/Alabama 5 months (very unfriendly especially to Mass accents 
      and other races) Virginia 2 years (Very friendly) New York off and on
      (very friendly).
    
           So I guess it all counts on your personality and disposition.
    
    
    
    Chappy
63.1978!978WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 30 1996 19:503
    
    
    It was a very good year!
63.1981BIGQ::MCKAYWed May 01 1996 11:043
    OK who saved the deleted notes, and who was involved?????
    
    Jimbo
63.1982WHO WON THE GAME?????DAAAAAAAAA!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu May 02 1996 13:398
    
    	Anyone have the stats for last nights game???  Who was the winning
    	pitcher?  Anyone hit any home runs???  
    
    	Thanks so much in advance....
    
    		The Chief,
    			W A H O O !
63.1983ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 02 1996 14:065
    
    McDowell, the stiff won.  He's 3-1 now.
    
    Look for the tribe to finish off the sweep tonight.  After starting off
    slow at 4-5, they are now nearing .700 ball for the season.
63.1984A L B E R T B E L L E 10 HOME RUNS!!!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu May 02 1996 15:0613
    
    	What about those batting averages.....there are 5 guys with over
    	.300!!!!
    
    
    	No question who is the best in the Central!!!
    
    
    	The Tribe!
    
    
    		The Chief,
    			W A H O O ! ! ! 
63.1985C L E V E L A N D R O C K S SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri May 03 1996 12:518
    
    
    
    			CLEVELAND ROCKS SEATTLE
    
    
    
    Game suspended....
63.1986PHHSS1::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Fri May 03 1996 21:163
    Maybe Ken Behring was right about earthquakes in seattle.
    
    
63.1987ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 09 1996 18:106
    
    Looks like the Yankmees season is over with Cone gone for the season. 
    Sure, they may win the AL lEAST, but they will have no chance to beat
    Cleveland in the playoffs.  It'll be ironic when Cleveland beats the
    Yankmees in the playoffs with a Black Jack clinching victory (and yes,
    it'll probably be a sweep or 4-1 at worst!)
63.1988MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu May 09 1996 18:376
 re .1987:

	Another gem that would look good on a fried crow sammich.


	billl
63.1989AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. BSThu May 09 1996 18:491
    What's the status of Key.  I'd trade a healthy Key for a lost Cone.
63.1990CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 09 1996 19:015
  Key is struggling along at 1-3 with a 6.578 ERA. There have been reports that
he's been tired and at one point they delayed one of his starts a couple days
to see if the extra rest would help.

  George
63.1991XTATIC::CHILDSThu May 09 1996 19:122
Yeah but Bill the price of serving that Crow is much too high!!!!!!!
63.1992WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu May 09 1996 19:307
    
    
       Key actually has been pitching better of late. Groaner put a P_name
    bet on that. If they both get there. Read my Lips!
    
    
           THE YANKEES OWN THE INDIANS!!!!!!!
63.1993ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 09 1996 21:326
    
    I offered you the better record bet - you declined.
    I offered you the who would go further - you declined.
    
    What wager are you proposing now?
    
63.1994WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri May 10 1996 11:486
    
    
       Never mind.
    
       I was reminded yesterday by a couple of people about your welching
    last year. So I'll pass!
63.1995ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri May 10 1996 12:512
    
    I welched last year?
63.1996Not to meWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri May 10 1996 13:027
    
    
       Glad to see you admitted it.
    
    
    
    >  I welched last year.
63.1997HehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehSUBPAC::SKALSKIFri May 10 1996 13:556
    
    
    
    
    
    		Hehehehehehehehehehheheheheheheheheheheheheh!
63.1998AND HE EXPLODES FOR ANOTHER ONE...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri May 10 1996 14:0211
    
    
    	Albert hit his 13th of the season the other day!!!  A 3 run shot!
    
    
    	Anyone see the article in SI on Albert???
    
    
    
    
    		TICK....TICK.....TICK.......T I C K ! ! ! !
63.1999IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri May 10 1996 14:095
>AND HE EXPLODES FOR ANOTHER ONE...

Another temper tantrum?

I do see an endorsement opportunity for Albert - the US Postal Service...
63.2000Indian snarf...IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri May 10 1996 14:090
63.2001TICK....TICK....TICK....T I C K ! ! ! SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri May 10 1996 14:2010
    
    
    	If you read the article about Albert, you may think differntly
    about him.  This could have all started from an incident many years
    ago in college days.  I honestly can't blame him for not trusting
    anyone....
    
    
    	WAHOO!
    
63.2002IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri May 10 1996 14:2919
>    	If you read the article about Albert, you may think differntly
>    about him.

Hal, I've read *many* articles about him, many in national publications,
some as wire feeds to the Globe (i.e. not written here), others by the
Globe writers.

Granted, the guy does a lot of good things for charity.  He also has a
right to a certain amount of privacy.  I'd probably love to sit down, have
a couple of beers with him, and listen to him talk baseball (and hitting in
particular).  But he has to learn that violence is not an appropriate
reaction to situations that are not to his liking.  He's not the only player 
who needs to learn the lesson, but he's at the top of the list.

I don't care what happened in college - you don't try and run kids down with
a car.  You don't scream epithets at a reporter doing their job in the dugout,
and you don't drill a photographer for taking pictures. 

Your "TICK...TICK...TICK..." title is extremely appropriate.
63.2003What will John Hart do?MUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldFri May 10 1996 14:478
Now that Belle's negotiations for a long term contract seem to have broken
down for good, I'm reading in a number of places that Indians' management is
starting to wonder if $7+ million a year isn't better invested in a left fielder
AND a pitcher, especially since Albert seems to want to test the market.

Belle's PR problems are said to have something to do with this attitude.

Steve
63.2004Read the article then come back in here...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri May 10 1996 14:499
    
    	Ok, you may say that what happened many years ago doesn't matter
    anymore but.....lets look at what happened.
    
    	Joey was in the dugout and some fan screems that he is a niger...
    He expects something to be done about it.  He actually tried looking
    fan up but had no luck.  From what was said, nothing was ever done
    about it.  To Albert, it was not right!  There's lots more to the story
    but how would you feel?????  It started there.  
63.2005Give him time!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri May 10 1996 14:506
    
    	Albert wants to be the highest paid player in the league...the 
    numbers say he should be...He'll sign with the Tribe.  Cleveland
    won't let him go!
    
    	wahooooo
63.2006ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri May 10 1996 15:1214
>    Albert wants to be the highest paid player in the league...
    
    Yes...
    
>    the numbers say he should be...
    
    No, they don't.  _Maybe_ in a one or two year contract.  But to
    sign Belle to a long-term, $8 million a year deal at age 30 is
    extremely risky; I wouldn't do it.  I'd rather see Giles or Burnitz
    out there next year, more money available for other areas, and a couple
    of extra draft picks (Belle _is_ a good player to sign up for
    arbitration with; no matter what happens, you win).
    
    Joe
63.2007PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Fri May 10 1996 16:475
    The tribe would be better off getting Barry Bonds to play LF (he
    should be cheaper than Belle).  Minus
    his attitude, I still think he is of the best players in the game
    (better than Belle). He can field well, hits for average, has speed and
    power. Not too much of a clutch hitter in the playoffs though 8^(.
63.2008IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri May 10 1996 16:504
Speaking of which, Mr. Bonds shoved Rod Beaton of USA Today in the 
clubhouse the other day while Beaton was there to interview someone else.

Barry was probably upset it wasn't him being interviewed...
63.2009sorry but...POWDML::GARBARINOFri May 10 1996 17:095
>Speaking of which, Mr. Bonds shoved Rod Beaton of USA Today in the 
>clubhouse the other day while Beaton was there to interview someone else.

Rod Beaton probably deserved it.  Just based on the tone of his writing
he seems like someone who would get on a player's nerves.
63.2010BSS::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Mon May 13 1996 21:354
      Nah, he pushed him that day 'cause he had to mail another alimony
    check that probably about drained his account(-)
    
     Tim
63.20115-1 right now...ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri May 17 1996 11:555
    
    Which clown was telling me that Black Jack was a 13-11 pitcher on the
    Indians this year?
    
    
63.2012CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri May 17 1996 12:3912
>                             -< 5-1 right now... >-
>
>    
>    Which clown was telling me that Black Jack was a 13-11 pitcher on the
>    Indians this year?


Well, it wasn't me, but I'd assume there's still enough time for him to
go 8-10 the rest of the way?
    
    

63.2013ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri May 17 1996 15:464
    
    
    The only way Black Jack goes 8-10 the rest of the way is if he gets
    traded to the Tigers and pitches all 18 games v.s. the Indians!
63.2014ANOTHER SWEEP! THIS MAKES WHAT? 4 SWEEPS?SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri May 17 1996 16:5119
    
    	Big night for Albert yesterday....2 shots and he takes the HR lead!
    
    	Terible thing the commish did to him though.  I really don't think
    	its very fair at all!  Lets see what the commish does to that 
    	Phillips guy from the White Sox...
    
    	Eddie smacked a dinger yesterday too.  Good to see!
    
    	Carlos Bierga appears to still be having trouble behind the
    plate...watch out when he pulls out though....this lineup is 
    awsome!  
    
    	Not too sure that Black Jack could go 8-10 against the tribe 
    though...The Indians only need 1 or 2 shots against a new guy 
    before the scalping begins!
    
    	The Chief,
    		WAHOO!
63.2015POWDML::GARBARINOFri May 17 1996 16:583
Black Jack was great during Aug and Sep last year.  He sucked from
Apr-Jul (remember "Jack The Flipper" ?).  And we all know how well
he pitched in the playoffs.... :^(
63.2016IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri May 17 1996 17:3114
>    	Terible thing the commish did to him though.  I really don't think
>    	its very fair at all!  Lets see what the commish does to that 
>    	Phillips guy from the White Sox...

The commissioner may not need to do anything.  Phillips may be brought up
on assault charges.  Of course, he didn't do anything to Belle, either - the
AL president did.

I think that it was pretty appropriate.  Supposedly, one of the conditions
coming out of his last run-in was that he seek counseling, and it appears he
hasn't been following up on this.

The stuff about community service was grandstanding, though - I've heard that
Belle already does a substantial amount of that to begin with.
63.2017ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri May 17 1996 18:084
    
    I'm really crushed that Justice is probably lost for the season.  I
    guess that will be one of the many excuses used when the Braves fail
    to repeat this year.
63.2018Can't hit good pitching?ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsFri May 17 1996 18:185
    And what excuse will the Tribe trot out? One of the ones they used in
    1995, no doubt?
    
    UMDan
    
63.2019ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri May 17 1996 20:587
    
    No excuses will be needed, Tribe will win it all easily.  Atlanta's
    excuse will also include that their hitting sucked so bad that their
    self-proclaimed all world pitching couldn't bail them out.
    
    What really makes me sad is that the Indians won't even get to beat
    the Braves in the WS - Atlanta will be watching from home.
63.2020some folks just never learnMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsFri May 17 1996 21:467
	Is it me or did we hear this same foul stench spewing 
	forth regarding the Browns/Ravens and the Steelers last
	fall?



	billl
63.2021ROCK::GRONOWSKISat May 18 1996 02:573
    
    Yes, you were the one talking about how the Steelers were going all
    the way.  We all know what happened.
63.20221996 projected standings - based on Home and Road W/L percentagesROCK::GRONOWSKITue May 21 1996 17:1920
            -ACTUAL-  ---Home-- ---Road--  ===PROJECTED===
             W    L    W    L    W    L         W    L
            ===  ===  ===  ===  ===  ===       ===  ===
New York     24   16   16    7    8    9      94.5 67.5
Baltimore    24   18   15    9    9    9      91.1 70.9
Toronto      20   23    9   10   11   13      75.5 86.5
Boston       17   24   12   10    5   14      65.5 96.5
Detroit      12   33    6   12    6   21        45  117

Cleveland    28   13   14    4   14    9      112. 49.7
Chicago      24   18   11    5   13   13      96.2 65.8
Milwaukee    21   20   10   10   11   10      82.9 79.1
Minnesota    18   24   11   12    7   12      68.6 93.4
Kansas Cit   19   26    8   13   11   13      68.0 94.0

Texas        27   16   18    7    9    9      98.8 63.2
Seattle      22   20   13   11    9    9      84.4 77.6
Oakland      20   22   10   12   10   10      77.3 84.7
California   20   23   13    8    7   15      75.9 86.1

63.2023PCBUOA::MORGANTue May 21 1996 17:281
    Busy day huh, Groaner?
63.2024CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue May 21 1996 17:394
  Hey, for all his faults, at least he ran the BNBAL stats on time.

  George
63.2025WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue May 21 1996 18:588
    
    
    
       Groan figure out how with that record the tribe loses to the Yanks
    in 5 games???
    
    
    Chap
63.2026ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 22 1996 15:3910
    
    Chappy, always willing to flap the lip, but never willing to wager.  
    Problem is, Chappy wouldn't make the wager last year either, because
    his offer last year only took effect if Cleveland and NY played in
    the playoffs.  This is the polite way of saying that his team -
    the Yanks suck, and won't even make it that far.  What is the Yanks
    record v.s. the Indians this year, and where were the games played?
    
    
    
63.2027WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed May 22 1996 15:4711
    
    
          I  lost a wager to you last year it was for who went
    farther....Hello???
    
    
        I offered you the  same this year but you want the better record
    stipulation instead???
    
    
         Whats wrong with your memory Groan?
63.2028ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 22 1996 15:545
    
    No, I wanted who went further, you said you'd only wager on who won
    if they met in the playoffs.  If the Yankees are better, explain to
    me why they wouldn't have a better record at the end of the season?
    
63.2029WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed May 22 1996 15:5810
    
    
        You see the Yankees have a thing called rivalries in the AL east.
    When we play Boston/Baltimore/Toronto its very hard to sweep these
    teams because we all get way up for these games. Cleveland on the other
    hand don't have any rivalries to speak of. Minnesota? Milwaukee?
    Puuleeeaasse.
    
        Like you've said whenever it benefits you. "lokk at the head to
    head record baby"
63.2030WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed May 22 1996 16:0220
    
    
    
    
    Why would I have this P_name last year Groaner?? I tell you these
    dellusions you have are clouding your memory???
    
    
                    <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
    
    
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 45.1196                  New York Yankee Note                  1196 of 1544
WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Cleveland Indians a great team " 4 lines  20-OCT-1995 15:32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
       Well with friends like that.....
63.2031CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 22 1996 16:5612
  Don't all the teams play the same number of games against teams inside and
outside their division? Seems Cleveland should be playing Baltimore and Toronto
just as many times as the Yanks play them. 

  Of course when interleague play comes along that will impact the teams in
different divisions. Imagine if one AL division had to play games against the
Expos, Braves, and other NL East teams while another division got to play the
Astros, Cubs and other NL Central teams. 

  Interleague play, shake and blend.

  George
63.2032ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 22 1996 16:573
    
    Actually, Cleveland will play more games v.s. AL East teams than the
    Yankees this year... 
63.2033CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 22 1996 17:004
  Is that just because the Yankees don't have to play themselves or do the
Indians play more games against the other A.L. East teams than the Yankees?

  George
63.2034READ MY LIPS RIVALRIES!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed May 22 1996 17:017
    
    
       Do you think the Red sox will be up for Cleveland come september
    when they are 18 out? NO! Will they get up for the Yanks? Yes! Same
    for Toronto etc...
    
    Chap
63.2035:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed May 22 1996 17:033
    
    
        The Red Sox play against themselves every night!
63.2036ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 22 1996 17:035
    
    DA FACTS!
    
    Chappy says - "Rivalries, that's why NY won't have a better record"
    Reality - CLEVELAND HAS A BETTER TEAM.
63.2037EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed May 22 1996 17:288
    
>        The Red Sox play against themselves every night!
    
    Better than playing with themselves, a la David Cone...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2038CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 22 1996 17:4430
  Right now it appears the Indians do have the better team. New York looked
good on paper but to get back to the Indian's level their pitchers ERAs have to
come down from the stratosphere.

  Doc Gooden is doing a good one man job of making that happen but somehow
despite the warms feelings these days toward Doc I'm sure there are plenty of
New Yorkers dreading the sound of the clock striking 12 when ever Doc takes
the mound.

  Meanwhile, however, the Braves are on a roll. They are now in 1st place in
the NL East and According to USA Today they are 4-0 without Justice in right
field. When Justice went on the DL the Braves called up Jermaine Dye from
AAA Richmond and he became the 71st player in the history of major league
ball to hit a home run his 1st at bat. I saw him pinch hit Monday and he flew
out to center but it was a screaming line drive. They are saying he will
platoon in right with Dwight Smith until Jerome Walton is healthy. 

  The Indians still know who they have to beat to take home the World Series
Trophy.

  PUM ...     PUM 
          PUM     PUM

                      PUM ... PUM
                                  PUM

                                      PUM

  GO BRAVES !!!
  George
63.2039WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed May 22 1996 17:517
    
    
        C'mon Glenn you mean to tell me you've never whacked off?
    
    
    
    Get serious
63.2040Woops forgot theWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed May 22 1996 17:523
    
    
      :-)
63.2041Next time could we have a euphemism?EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed May 22 1996 18:0412
    
>        C'mon Glenn you mean to tell me you've never whacked off?
    
    Not in the bullpen... gawd man, take it to the clubhouse at least...
    
    You're just so suave sometimes, Chappy.  Too much time in those Yankee 
    Stadium bleachers (that's near the bullpens for those not familar) has 
    left you with the most refined social graces.

    
    glenn
    
63.2042:-0WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed May 22 1996 18:1813
    
    
        Whacking/Playing its all the same.
    
       No one was suppose to be there man. He thought he had privacy. I
    mean how much more private can you get than a 56,000 seat stadium that
    was suppose to be empty.
    
       Besides he may have just been adjusting his "ATHLETIC SUPPORTER"  jock
    
    
    Suave does what theres does for alot less.
    
63.2043ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 22 1996 18:186
    
    Atlanta is also in first place with a schedule that has been heavy on
    home games - and Atlanta is a .500 team on the road.
    
    I will no longer address Indians comments made by bandwagon jumping
    fans. 
63.2044For you bandwagon jumpersWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed May 22 1996 18:193
    
    
      Atlanta up 5-0 Tommy G on the mound. 
63.2045EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed May 22 1996 18:2724
    Will Joey hit 61 this year?
    
    
    I read the SI article on Belle, and in this article's assessment, 
    Belle's irrational behavior stems from his mother's very strong 
    influences and likewise angry outlook on life, more than anything.  
    It's a bit too convenient to believe that all of Belle's misdirected 
    anger is derived from a single racial epithet he heard after 
    striking out once in college.  No one including his college coach 
    believes that this is the reason he must berate Hannah Storm, fire 
    baseballs at an innocent photographer, etc.  Nor his friends, and 
    teammates...
    
    As for Tony Phillips, sure, he may be suspended (personally I don't
    think he should be), but at least he exacted his revenge upon the 
    source of the problem.  I don't know the details but if Phillips 
    at least afforded the guy the opportunity to defend himself, then 
    the jerk got what he was asking for.  Phillips left the game, took 
    off the uniform and reverted to civilian status, which is where 
    the matter should be handled. 
    
    glenn
    
63.2046ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 22 1996 18:564
    
    Phillips shouldn't be suspended, yet you advocated suspension for
    Belle as a result of the Halloween incident, didn't you?
    
63.2047I think that is what pissed him off..forever!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed May 22 1996 19:365
    
    	Yea.....what Paul said!
    
    
    	WaHooooo!
63.2048EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed May 22 1996 19:5618
    
>    Phillips shouldn't be suspended, yet you advocated suspension for
>    Belle as a result of the Halloween incident, didn't you?
    
    No... I merely suggested a trick-or-treat party at my house, in lieu
    of jailtime.  It _is_ pretty sad that a $6M/year athlete is too big
    to put out candy for the neighborhood kids, however.  Most of us,
    having once been adolescents ourselves, understand the consequences,
    which usually do not involve being run down by a car.
    
    No matter.  In due time, if Belle's bizarre behavior continues, it 
    won't be the Indians or baseball that pays the price, but Belle 
    himself.  Someday someone will decide that it's not just wahoo funny 
    and that person will _own_ Albert Belle and his next $35M.
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2049ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 22 1996 20:1312
    
    No... what you've done is taken the media's account of the Belle
    incident and formed an opinion.  You have no idea what really 
    happened yet you make judgements based on your perception of
    reality.   
    
    Did Belle refuse to give candy?  Maybe he ran out.  Even if he
    did refused to give out candy, does that give the people the right
    to vandalize his property?   
    
    It _is_ pretty sad that an adult can be controlled so completely
    by today's media. 
63.2050No doubt Albert was manipulated into tirade...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed May 22 1996 20:209
>    It _is_ pretty sad that an adult can be controlled so completely
>    by today's media. 
    
    Hannah Storm thinks so...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2051ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 22 1996 20:255
    
    Nice try Glenn, when you don't have an answer for the question at hand,
    change the subject.  
    
    
63.2052EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed May 22 1996 20:3513
    
    What "question at hand"?  This one?
    
>    Phillips shouldn't be suspended, yet you advocated suspension for
>    Belle as a result of the Halloween incident, didn't you?
    
    I gave you the answer.  No, you were wrong; I didn't advocate a 
    suspension, but I reserve the right to think that Albert Belle is 
    a first-class jerk.  If you want to believe that this is a result
    of media mind control, so be it.
    
    glenn
    
63.2053ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 22 1996 20:388
    
    The question at hand was related to whether you were knew the
    exact details of the Halloween incident, or if you were basing
    you accusations on partial data.
    
    God help us if you read the National Enquirer and have as
    much faith in that newspaper as you appear to have in other
    media sources.
63.2055CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 22 1996 20:519
RE                     <<< Note 63.2043 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

>    I will no longer address Indians comments made by bandwagon jumping
>    fans. 

  Well since you have everyone over the age of 6 labeled as a bandwagon jumping
fan I guess we won't be hearing from you much any more. 

  George
63.2056EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed May 22 1996 21:1219
    
>    The question at hand was related to whether you were knew the
>    exact details of the Halloween incident, or if you were basing
>    you accusations on partial data.
    
    "As is my custom, I refused to give out candy on Halloween.  When
    called on the practice by some fun-loving teenagers bearing eggs, 
    I dialed 9-1-1 in an obvious emergency and informed the police 
    that they'd better get someone over here, lest I were to 'kill' 
    somebody.  When they delayed, I hopped into my late-model 
    Mercedes and proceeded to patrol the area, looking to strike the 
    first available urchin before the authorities arrived.  I was 
    successful; unfortunately the injuries were only minor.  On my 
    way home, I fueled up; only later did I realize that in my anger
    I had paid credit-card prices at the cash pump.  Next year, 
    beware of razor blades..."
    
    			-- Joey Belle, as told to The Enquirer
    
63.2057IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu May 23 1996 12:473
Well, Black Jack's ERA went through a minor adjustment last night.

He'll still win 17 or 18...
63.2058ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 23 1996 16:528
    
    Black Jack got slapped silly!  Wonder where Clemens will be put in the
    rotation when he gets traded to Cleveland later in the year.  
    
    I guess the best part about that prediction is, when someone heard
    it they claimed Clemens would refuse to go.  RIGHT!  No thanks,
    I'd rather stay here in losersville, USA than win a WS ring.  I don't
    think so... but I won't mention Jerry's name.
63.2059CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 23 1996 17:137
  Actually trading Clemens to the tribe would make some sense depending on who
they got in return. The Sox should be able to clean out the middle levels of
the Tribe's farm system and maybe get someone from AAA.

  Who do you think the Tribe would offer?

  George
63.2060ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 23 1996 17:2131
    
    George, I think you're dreaming here if you think Clemens will bring
    enough to "clean out the middle levels of the Tribe's farm system."
    Clemens is a free agent at the end of the season and could return to
    Boston, stay with the team he gets traded to or go to another team.
    This is *NOT* the Roger Clemens of the mid-80s.  Clemens would bring
    2 good prospects - not the 6 that someone else suggested in private.
    
    The Sox need a closer, I would think the Indians would offer one
    of their three young closers in waiting Alan Embree, Paul Shuey
    or Danny Graves.  Shuey and Graves are both pitching very well in
    AAA, and Embree has pitched well in the majors this year (excluding
    his last outing).  Atlanta claimed he was the toughest lefty they
    faced last year.
    
    So it would be one of those three plus one other pitcher or position
    player - but it would *NOT* be any of Bartolo Colon, Jaret Wright
    or Casey Whitten.  It could possibly be Albie Lopez or Chad Ogea.
    
    Most of the position players are in the bigs...  Herbert Perry plays
    1b, so the sox would not want him.  The Indians have to highly
    rated SS prospects, but Boston doesn't need a SS.  They do not have
    what I consider to be a prime OF prospect at AAA or AA (although
    Joe might disagree - Giles).  Rich Sexson may be their best hitting
    prospect now, but he's at AA, plays 1B and I doubt the Indians would
    deal him.
    
    
    The trade makes too much sense to me... believe me, Clemens *WILL*
    get traded this year.  Cleveland will land either Clemens, Appier
    or the next pitcher down.
63.2061CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 23 1996 17:3111
  I agree Clemens is not worth what he once was but he might be worth a lot to
the Indians this year because he could mean turning a good chance of winning
the Pennant and a so-so chance of beating the Braves into a solid chance of
winning the Pennant and good chance of beating the Braves.

  Most likely you are right and he wouldn't clean out the Tribe's farm system
but I'd expect him to bring more than a couple prospects. Considering that many
prospects don't pan out, trading Clemens for 2 minor leaguers would really be
trading him for one good rookie. He'd be worth more than that to the Tribe.

  George
63.2062IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu May 23 1996 17:3112
>    They do not have
>    what I consider to be a prime OF prospect at AAA or AA (although
>    Joe might disagree - Giles).

Brian Giles?  I'm surprised he's not collecting Social Security.

I don't think the Sox trade Clemens to Cleveland *unless* they can get one
of the highly rated guys you've said the Tribe won't part with.  I think
Cleveland is more likely to get Appier.

I think Black Jack getting rocked last night is like those corrections
you hear about on the stock market.
63.2063ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu May 23 1996 17:3434
    
>    Most of the position players are in the bigs...  Herbert Perry plays
>    1b, so the sox would not want him.
    
    He's also not a prospect, but a plyaer at this point (albeit a decent
    one).
    
>    The Indians have to (sic) highly
>    rated SS prospects, but Boston doesn't need a SS.
    
    No, Boston needs catchers (I wouldn't mind trading them Diaz, except
    he's the only thing resembling a catching prospect in the Tribe's
    system), and OF.  The Indians likely won't trade Wilson, but proably
    would trade Jackson.
    
>    They do not have
>    what I consider to be a prime OF prospect at AAA or AA (although
>    Joe might disagree - Giles).
    
    He's not a _prime_ prospect - he's a bit too old for that - but
    IMHO he'd make a _fine_ player.  Hits for average, some power, some
    speed, and he walks a ton.  DD would like him, I think.
    
>    Rich Sexson may be their best hitting
>    prospect now, but he's at AA, plays 1B and I doubt the Indians would
>    deal him.
    
    Not likely.  The Sox might be interested in Russell Branyan, or maybe
    David Miller or Sean Casey.
    
    I can certainly see a Embree/Graves/Shuey (pick one) plus Giles and
    an A-ball pitcher for Clemens deal...
    
    Joe
63.2064ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu May 23 1996 17:367
    
>Brian Giles?  I'm surprised he's not collecting Social Security.
    
    He's only 25, and posted a .500 SLG and nearly a .400 OBP in Buffalo
    last year.  Looks like a decent player to me...
    
    Joe
63.2065Indian's Minor League StatsCLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 23 1996 17:4465
  Indians AAA as of last week (USA Today WWW):

                                BUFFALO BISONS
                                      AVG  AB   R   H 2B 3B HR RBI  BB  SO  SB
   #Candaele, Casey, 2B          ... .310 145  22  45  8  1  1  10   8  12   2
    Costo, Tim, DH               ... .206  34   4   7  1  0  2   5   2  11   0
   *Dunn, Steve, 1B              ... .244  86   9  21  4  1  2  15   4  18   1
   *Giles, Brian, OF             ... .275 120  21  33  5  0  7  20  14   9   0
   *Helfand, Eric, C             ... .250  64   9  16  2  0  1   5  11  12   0
    Jackson, Damian, SS          ... .252 111  15  28  2  0  0  10   8  15   3
    Lis, Joe, 2B                 ... .169  77  12  13  4  0  3   9   9  10   0
    Marsh, Tom, OF               ... .252 119  17  30  6  0  5  12   3  22   4
    Perry, Herbert, 1B           ... .368  87  10  32  6  0  2  16   3  11   2
    Sparks, Don, 3B              ... .292 130  16  38  5  1  2  15  22  27   1
    Thompson, Ryan, OF           ... .204 142  17  29  5  0  4  16   5  33   4
   *Wilson, Nigel, DH            ... .313 112  24  35  6  0  9  29  12  23   0
    Wilson, Tom, C               ... .278  54   8  15  6  0  2   7   8  17   0

                                  W  L    ERA   G SV  IP     H   R  ER  BB  SO
   *Cadaret, Greg            .... 0  1   5.40   1  0   1.2   0   1   1   3   0
    Cornelius, Reid          .... 1  0   4.35   7  0  31.0  38  17  15  15  18
    Graves, Dan              .... 2  0   0.76  18 11  35.1  23   3   3   7  19
    Lewis, James             .... 3  1   5.06   7  0  37.1  42  24  21  16  28
    Lopez, Albie             .... 2  0   1.61   4  0  22.1  12   6   4  15  23
    Ogea, Chad               .... 0  0   3.00   1  0   3.0   3   1   1   0   3
    Scott, Darryl            .... 0  1   1.99  11  0  22.2  16   5   5   6  19
    Shuey, Paul              .... 2  2   1.31  12  3  20.2  11   3   3   8  29
    Wertz, Bill              .... 1  1   5.14  11  0  21.0  26  13  12  12  15
   *Whitten, Casey           .... 1  0   3.86   2  0   9.1   6   6   4   4   9
   *Williams, Jimmy          .... 5  3   4.39  11  0  26.2  28  17  13  17  25

  Indians AA as of last week (USA Today WWW):
                                CANTON-AKRON INDIANS
                                      AVG  AB   R   H 2B 3B HR RBI  BB  SO  SB
    Aven, Bruce, OF              ... .248 141  23  35  6  1  6  19  18  41   7
   *Betts, Todd, 3B              ... .221 113  15  25  5  0  1  12  21  27   0
    Betzsold, James, OF          ... .167  42   3   7  1  0  0   4   5  17   1
    Bryant, Pat, OF              ... .189  90  13  17  1  1  3  16  17  19   6
    Diaz, Einar, C               ... .319 119  15  38 14  0  1  11   1   6   1
    Gutierrez, Ricky, 2B         ... .232 151  24  35  2  0  3  14  13  14  12
   *McCall, Rod, DH              ... .324  74  13  24  3  0  4  12   9  19   1
    Neal, Mike, 3B               ... .189  53   5  10  1  0  0   9  10  10   0
    Ramirez, Alex, OF            ... .289 128  16  37  7  3  1  17   6  19   7
    Sexson, Richie, 1B           ... .294 160  26  47  9  2  5  27  14  40   0
    Soliz, Steve, C              ... .243  37   4   9  3  1  0   2   2   8   1
   *Thomas, Greg, DH             ... .225  89  10  20  4  0  4  12   7  19   0
   #Wilson, Enrique, SS          ... .329 167  18  55  5  2  0  22  13  19  10
                                       CANTON-AKRON INDIANS
                                  W  L    ERA   G SV  IP     H   R  ER  BB  SO
    Brown, Dickie            .... 0  2   8.03   6  0  12.1  13  12  11   9  11
    Colon, Bartolo           .... 2  0   1.15   7  0  39.0  26   7   5  16  45
    DeLaMaza, Roland         .... 3  1   4.67  14  0  34.2  29  19  18  12  41
    DeLaRosa, Maximo         .... 2  3   5.03  14  3  19.2  17  12  11  17  21
    Driskill, Travis         .... 2  2   6.06   9  0  35.2  42  31  24  18  34
   *Kline, Steven            .... 1  0   2.35   5  0  30.2  29   9   8   9  25
    Martinez, Johnny         .... 0  1   5.40   5  0   8.1   9   6   5   4   3
   *Matthews, Mike           .... 0  6   6.21   8  0  42.0  47  31  29  17  34
   *McCormack, Andy          .... 0  1  27.00   1  0   0.1   0   1   1   1   0
    Montoya, Wilmer          .... 0  0   3.00   3  2   3.0   3   1   1   3   2
   *Plantenberg, Erik        .... 0  0   4.05   5  0   6.2   8   3   3   0   9
    Sexton, Jeff             .... 2  3   4.98   8  0  47.0  40  26  26  21  34
   *Tolar, Kevin             .... 1  2   2.40  15  1  15.0  14   9   4   3  14
    Vaught, Jay              .... 1  2   3.14  15  1  28.2  28  13  10   8  20

  George
63.2066Don't kid yourself, Groaner...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu May 23 1996 17:4722
                          
>    George, I think you're dreaming here if you think Clemens will bring
>    enough to "clean out the middle levels of the Tribe's farm system."
    
    Cleveland's farm system is not that incredibly deep any more.  That's
    not a problem, because the great talent is in the bigs, but I don't 
    think George's statement is way off base.
    
>    So it would be one of those three plus one other pitcher or position
>    player - but it would *NOT* be any of Bartolo Colon, Jaret Wright
>    or Casey Whitten.  It could possibly be Albie Lopez or Chad Ogea.
    
    Why wouldn't it be one of those big three?  If Clemens is pitching
    as he is right now, the price would be steep, you can be sure of it.
    The compensation draft picks make that a reality; the Sox don't 
    _have_ to rid themselves of Clemens.  He won't just be had for a 
    borderline chump like Paul Shuey.  So it'll likely include one of 
    three mentioned above, or a deal with multiple players, including 
    2 or 3 players of the likes of Embree, Lopez, Ogea.
    
    glenn
    
63.2067ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 23 1996 18:316
    
    Cone was traded for 3 single A prospects.  Clemens for 2 AA/AAA
    prospects is reasonable.  I'd think Boston would jump at an
    Ogea or Lopez + Embree or Shuey for Clemens deal.  Heck, if 
    Boston really wants Clemens, he could resign after the end
    of the season and return with his WS ring.
63.2068AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. BSThu May 23 1996 18:354
    I would go after Smiley if the Reds continue to stall in the central
    but that's not a given.  Cleveland has to be looking South(paw)
    although perhaps Justice not be available for the series would alter
    that a little.  Still there's McGriff.
63.2069ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 23 1996 18:3724
    
    Its a complement hearing Shuey called a borderline chump from a fan of
    a team who hasn't produced anything resembling a major league pitcher
    since Roger Clemens.  Shuey is still learning how to pitch, and with 
    his numbers in AAA this year, I'd guess he's pretty close to being
    ready.
    
    PLAYER        W  L  S  ERA   G GS CG SHO    IP   H   R  ER
    Shuey         2  2  3  1.19 13  0  0   0  22.2  11   3   3
    
                HR  BB  SO  HB  WP   BK
                1   8  34   0   1    0
    
    That's 34 Ks in 22 1/3 ip...
    
    ... and if Boston is really stupid, they'll hold onto Clemens and watch
    him walk at the end of the year... sure they'll get the draft picks and
    that's it - so in 5 years they might have something to show for it.
    Clemens claims he likes it in Boston, but is he willing to stay here 
    knowing the odds of him winning a WS is ZILCH.  I don't think so...
    every blown save in one of his outings pushes him closer and closer to
    leaving at the end of the season.
    
    p.s. I'd rather have Appier anyways.
63.2070ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 23 1996 18:382
    
    I'd take Schourek over Smiley.
63.2071IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu May 23 1996 18:386
>>Brian Giles?  I'm surprised he's not collecting Social Security.
>    
>    He's only 25, and posted a .500 SLG and nearly a .400 OBP in Buffalo
>    last year.  Looks like a decent player to me...

Is this the same Brian Giles who was with the Mets forever ago?
63.2072:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu May 23 1996 18:388
    
    
    Groan Do you want Kamienicki?
    
      Joe. He's 25? He better do something soon or by yours and your hero
    Bill James he'll be over the hill.
    
           Chap
63.2073ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 23 1996 18:442
    
    Kam is a stiff.
63.2074AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. BSThu May 23 1996 18:561
    Shourek - perhaps you're right.  But Smiley would be the one available.
63.2075ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu May 23 1996 19:4420
    
>      Joe. He's 25? He better do something soon or by yours and your hero
>    Bill James he'll be over the hill.
    
    Besides the fact that Bill James is not my hero (I enjoy his writings,
    and he contributed a lot to the study of baseball, but he made a lot
    of mistakes as well), Giles _is_ doing something.  He's putting
    together a second straight good year at Buffalo.  There's every
    indication that he's a major league player right now, but he doesn't
    have the opportunity behind Belle, Lofton, Ramirez, and Burnitz,
    and Kirby's roster spot is safe so long as Belle's with the Tribe.
    I believe he'd hit .280-.290 in the majors right now, with 15-25 HR,
    a good OBP, and 10 SB or so.
    
    BTW, Chappy - on average, players peak at age 27; Giles should have his
    best season in 1998, or thereabouts, and should be an above average
    player through 2001 or so - not an unreasonable pick up at this
    point.
    
    Joe
63.2076AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. BSThu May 23 1996 20:159
    But Joe don't you think he'll atrophy badly if kept in the minors. 
    Players like Selby indicate to me that there is a serious gulf between
    AAA and the majors right now.  Suppan and his major league pitching
    record and minor league record is a reverse indication.
    
    I'd say those teams able to move prospects up and let them learn
    against major leaguers, like Cleveland from 1990-1993, have a big
    advantage vs clubs like the RedSox who attempt to contend every year
    (since 1967).
63.2077CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 23 1996 20:3417
RE <<< Note 63.2076 by AKOCOA::BREEN "Better days are coming bye and bye. BS" >>>

>    Players like Selby indicate to me that there is a serious gulf between
>    AAA and the majors right now.  

  I don't think the gulf is that serious. Last year Selby hit .286 with 13 home
runs in Double A. He hit .236 for the Sox in the majors. That's not bad for
your 1st few weeks after jumping up 2 levels. He certainly wasn't up long
enough to say it means all that much. If 2 more of his 46 at bats had found
legs and gone for hits he would have been around .270. 

  As for Suppan, again you are making the mistake of trying to say something
meaningful out of a small sample size. Last year he only had 3 starts in the
majors. We don't really have any indication about how well he would do if
he were to spend several months in the big leagues.

  George
63.2078ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu May 23 1996 20:3631
    
>    But Joe don't you think he'll atrophy badly if kept in the minors. 
    
    If he's still in the minors for another couple of years, then sure,
    it's a possibility.
    
>    Players like Selby indicate to me that there is a serious gulf between
>    AAA and the majors right now.
    
    I disagree.
    
>    Suppan and his major league pitching
>    record and minor league record is a reverse indication.
    
    You're looking at cases with small sample sizes, wherein anything's
    possibile.
    
    Minor league stats have, in almost every case, proven a reasonable
    prediction for major league success in the past; there's no reason
    to believe this is no longer the case.  It _is_ possible that the
    gap is somewhat larger, but this can be reasonably accounted for.
    
>    I'd say those teams able to move prospects up and let them learn
>    against major leaguers, like Cleveland from 1990-1993, have a big
>    advantage vs clubs like the RedSox who attempt to contend every year
>    (since 1967).
    
    It's certainly possible, particularly where position players are
    concerned.
    
    Joe
63.2079AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. BSThu May 23 1996 20:5610
    Well there's one enormous indication of the disparity between major and
    minor:  The horrific pitching at the major league level and teams not
    diving down the the minors to attempt to correct the problem.
    
    One point that some have inferred is that AA and AAA is not that much
    different.  But Joe and Paul and others, including yourself if you
    approach this question objectively, could probably make a more
    expansive attempt to answer the question "How large is the disparity
    between major and minor leagues and is it so large that good prospects
    may be hurt by spending too much time on the farm?".
63.2080CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 23 1996 21:0723
RE <<< Note 63.2079 by AKOCOA::BREEN "Better days are coming bye and bye. BS" >>>

>    Well there's one enormous indication of the disparity between major and
>    minor:  The horrific pitching at the major league level and teams not
>    diving down the the minors to attempt to correct the problem.
    
  First of all, what numbers are you comparing? Are you looking at average
ERA in the majors v. average ERA in the minors? If so, for what years? This
season is still pretty young to be making that type of comparison.

  Even if there is a big difference with major league ERAs being much higher
that would suggest that yes the split between major league and minor league
hitters was great but it would also suggest that the split between major and
minor league pitchers was small. Either that or there is some other difference
like different size strike zones, hotter major league balls, or something. 

  In any case, it's not clear that rushing a guy into the majors will make
him a better player. In some cases maybe that works. Guys like Griffey,
Willie Mays, Eddie Mathews, and Jimmy Fox seemed to do well as youngsters
but others might be so overpowered they wouldn't get a chance to learn how
to play the game.

  George
63.2081Duquette should play hardball on this oneEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri May 24 1996 14:0429
                        
>    Its a complement hearing Shuey called a borderline chump from a fan of
>    a team who hasn't produced anything resembling a major league pitcher
>    since Roger Clemens.
    
    So maybe Shuey has grown some and can no longer be considered a 
    1st-round bust.  Still, I would want more than a reliever as the 
    #1 player in a deal for Clemens.
    
    As for developing ML pitching, the Indians are still heavily reliant 
    on non-homegrown pitchers (Martinez, Hershiser, McDowell, Mesa) to
    get much of the job done.  And, imo, with the Indians Clemens would
    nonetheless become the #1 starter.
    
    Baseball America rates Indians' prospects Colon, Wright, and Whitten
    at #15, #34, and previously unranked, respectively.  For the services
    of a Roger Clemens (or Kevin Appier) in a World Series championship
    drive, I don't see that anyone with the possible exception of Colon
    as "untouchable".  For a team such as the Indians, I see such a 
    trade as totally defensible.  This is quite a bit different than if
    a much weaker team such as the Yankees had to give up the store for
    David Cone last year (which they didn't).
    
    Come money time, I'd rather have Clemens than Appier.  Even in last
    year's playoffs, in that game the Sox' bullpen/defense blew, Clemens 
    did a nice job in checking that mighty Indians' lineup.
    
    glenn
    
63.2082ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri May 24 1996 14:548
    
    w.r.t. Mesa
    
    I don't know - I have to consider him primarily a product of Cleveland;
    he showed no particular inclination towards being a pitcher before he
    came to the Tribe, where he developed significantly.
    
    Joe
63.2083EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri May 24 1996 15:1414
    
>    I don't know - I have to consider him primarily a product of Cleveland;
>    he showed no particular inclination towards being a pitcher before he
>    came to the Tribe, where he developed significantly.
    
    They had the wisdom to move him into fulltime short relief.  But I 
    doubt seriously they did anything especial to "develop" him, fix
    his mechanics, etc.  Nonetheless, for the record there's no way that 
    he's a product of the Cleveland minor-league system, like a guy who 
    may have been drafted elsewhere but spent the bulk of his minor-league
    career with another organization.
    
    glenn
    
63.2084ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri May 24 1996 15:3528
    
    Yes, clearly he's not a product of Cleveland's minor league system.
    
>    They had the wisdom to move him into fulltime short relief.  But I 
>    doubt seriously they did anything especial to "develop" him, fix
>    his mechanics, etc.
    
    I don't know - it appears to _me_ there was some development:
    
    1991 - 124 innings, 151 hits, 62 walks, 64 strikeouts, 5.97 ERA
    1992 - 161 innings, 169 hits, 70 walks, 62 strikeouts, 4.59 ERA
    1993 - 209 innings, 232 hits, 62 walks, 118 strikeouts, 4.92 ERA
    1994 - 73 innings, 71 hits, 26 walks, 63 strikeouts, 3.82 ERA
    1995 - 64 innings, 49 hits, 17 walks, 58 strikeouts, 1.13 ERA
    1996 - 22 innings, 15 hits, 6 walks, 19 strikeouts, 2.05 ERA
    
    W/inning ratios: 0.50, 0.43, 0.30, 0.36, 0.27, 0.27
    K/inning ratios: 0.52, 0.39, 0.56, 0.86, 0.91, 0.86
    H/inning ratios: 1.22, 1.05, 1.11, 0.99, 0.77, 0.68
    
    Hmmm - maybe it _was_ more the switch to relief than I thought.
    I had expected to see less of a divide between 1993 and 1994 than
    there was.  There certainly _was_ a big cut in his walk rate in 1993,
    but the other numbers really took off when he switched jobs.
    
    OK, I'll buy your argument.
    
    Joe
63.2085SNAX::ERICKSONFri May 24 1996 16:317
    
    	Jeff Suppan is only 21 years old, if the Sox don't have a chance
    at anything they will leave him at AAA all season long. The last
    pitcher under 21 who accomplished something was Dwight Gooden. Roger
    Clemens was 22 when he first started for the Red Sox.
    
    Ron
63.2086CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri May 24 1996 16:4015
  That's looking more and more likely. There was talk at 1st when he got
sent down that he was tuning up to take over Wakefield's spot but Wakefield
has turned around somewhat and while he still isn't that great he's been
doing ok. Or perhaps to put it another way, he's no longer doing bad enough
for the team to justify dumping him and eating his salary.

  So with 4 guys ahead of him the problem with bringing Suppan up now would be
that he'd be the 5th starter and wouldn't get the work he'll get in Pawtucket.

  If any of the top four were to go down with an injury I bet he would get the
call to fill that slot. If not then we may not see him around Boston until they
go to the 40 man rosters in September. 

  George
63.2087AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. BSTue May 28 1996 14:4716
    Gammons btw devoted his column Sunday to the subject of bringing
    players up from the minors.  He considered it a given that there IS a
    major disparity at this time between the majors and minors.  I had
    observed a few years ago that the National League was serving as a 4A
    between the top minors and the A.L.  Not so at any rate any more.
    
    The question now is Should pitchers (especially) and position players
    serve out lengthy internships at a level two clicks below Major league
    or learn at the big league level.  A good argument for the second
    choice is both Cleveland and Atlanta who developed its current teams at
    the top level moving the Smoltzs and Glavines and Joey Belles up early
    because of weak teams.
    
    The Redsox had a great prospect in the 60s (Stevenson who now scouts)
    and lost him when they sent him down to the minors and he injured his
    arm on a poorly groomed mound.
63.2088Kevin Kennedy too BLAM for "rushing" Suppan-- notEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue May 28 1996 15:0634
                            
>    Gammons btw devoted his column Sunday to the subject of bringing
>    players up from the minors.  He considered it a given that there IS a
>    major disparity at this time between the majors and minors. 
    
    Yes, I think the hitters in MLB are so damned good at present that 
    for the pitchers, there's a huge difference.  Now, if you're a good
    hitter, you're probably not going to be too intimidated by the jump
    to MLB.  It may only be cyclical, but pitching is way way down, imo.
    Umpires, expansion, and new ballparks can't entirely explain the 
    offensive explosion of the last 3-4 seasons.  Hitters are flatout
    dominating.  Hopefully, for the good of the sport, there will be a
    correction over the next 5 years.
    
>    The question now is Should pitchers (especially) and position players
>    serve out lengthy internships at a level two clicks below Major league
>    or learn at the big league level.  A good argument for the second
>    choice is both Cleveland and Atlanta who developed its current teams at
>    the top level moving the Smoltzs and Glavines and Joey Belles up early
>    because of weak teams.
    
    The part of Gammons' case for _not_ bringing up a Jeff Suppan now, 
    that I don't agree with, is the claim that unlike with Cleveland 
    and Atlanta, Boston is in a "win now" situation.  Who says?  This
    is once again an example of the hypocritical Boston sports media 
    which is exceedingly critical and cynical when the Sox are losing.  
    The media more than any other factor would be responsible for 
    placing pressure on Suppan were he to be recalled (I can see the 
    Herald headlines already-- "Sup-panned!").  Most fans I know would
    rather see Suppan, through all his struggles, than endure one more
    start from the likes of Jamie Moyer.
    
    glenn
    
63.2089ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue May 28 1996 15:1238
    
>    Gammons btw devoted his column Sunday to the subject of bringing
>    players up from the minors.  He considered it a given that there IS a
>    major disparity at this time between the majors and minors.  I had
>    observed a few years ago that the National League was serving as a 4A
>    between the top minors and the A.L.  Not so at any rate any more.
    
    I read it, and I still think it's a bunch of malarky.  Pitchers have
    _always_ taken longer to adjust to the majors, for any number of
    reasons.  There are rare exceptions, but the difficulty in adjusting
    to _any_ new level of competition is one of the reasons I believe
    Earl Weaver was dead-on with his use of rookie pitchers in the
    bullpen.
    
    Two of his three examples, btw (Wilson and Benes; I can't remember
    who else he cited) pitched less than 120 innings _combined_ in AAA
    last year.
    
>    The question now is Should pitchers (especially) and position players
>    serve out lengthy internships at a level two clicks below Major league
>    or learn at the big league level.  A good argument for the second
>    choice is both Cleveland and Atlanta who developed its current teams at
>    the top level moving the Smoltzs and Glavines and Joey Belles up early
>    because of weak teams.
    
    My opinion is that hitters should _always_ be moved along as fast as
    their bats warrant; pitchers should be held to a somewhat tighter
    standard.
    
    BTW, Alex Rodriguez did _not_ fail in his first two major league 
    attempts, as Gammons likes to claim; all indications last year were 
    that Rodriguez was a major league baseball player.
    
    I also quite enjoyed how Gammons talked about the difference between
    AAA and the majors in one section, and then in the very next section
    talked about the success of a rookie pitcher (whose name escapes me).
    
    Joe
63.2090SNAX::ERICKSONTue May 28 1996 15:2916
    re .2088,
    
    	Glen, I interpreted the "Win Now" completely different then you
    did. Gammons was referring to "Win Now", as do the Sox have a
    legitimate chance at winning the division or a wildcard? If Yes, then 
    bring up Suppan, if no then leave him in AAA for the season. There is
    no reason to bring him up if your going to finish in 3rd place. Gammons
    doesn't think the Sox have a chance, so he prefers leaving Suppan at
    AAA. KK wants to bring Suppan up now, but the Sox don't want him to
    lose his confidence if he doesn't have success, plus the Sox need a
    long relief man more than a starting pitcher.
    	If Jeff went to UCLA instead of signing with the Sox, he would most
    likely have been a top 10 pick in this years June 10th draft.
    
    
    Ron
63.2091CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue May 28 1996 15:479
  One problem with bringing Suppan up right now is that Kennedy might use him
in long relief. That might fit into Kennedy's short term plans for trying to
get the team to win but might not fit the clubs long term plans for Suppan.

  Somewhere it was mentioned that the next time they bring Suppan up they
would like him to stay. That would probably be best if there was a spot for
him in the starting rotation.

  George
63.2092There's always a break-in period in the majors-- make it nowEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue May 28 1996 15:5026
                     
>    Glen, I interpreted the "Win Now" completely different then you
>    did. Gammons was referring to "Win Now", as do the Sox have a
>    legitimate chance at winning the division or a wildcard? If Yes, then 
>    bring up Suppan, if no then leave him in AAA for the season. There is
>    no reason to bring him up if your going to finish in 3rd place. Gammons
>    doesn't think the Sox have a chance, so he prefers leaving Suppan at
>    AAA.
    
    I don't think that was Gammons' point, because he raised the "win now"
    exception in the context of what the Cubs did with Greg Maddux, and the 
    Braves with their entire staff, which was to allow them to develop,
    successfully, in the big leagues with weak teams.
    
    I don't see any point to leaving Suppan in AAA.  AAA ain't MLB, and 
    Suppan is fairly dominating the International League.
    
    And yes, the Sox need relief pitching, but they only "don't need"
    starting pitching relative to the poor relief work.  In their own
    right, Wakefield, Sele, Gordon and Moyer (and now Eshelman, who is
    _not_ a prospect just because he throws with his left arm; I don't
    care what these writers think) have been stinking the joint out 
    on a regular basis.
    
    glenn
    
63.2093ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue May 28 1996 17:0911
    
>  One problem with bringing Suppan up right now is that Kennedy might use him
>in long relief. That might fit into Kennedy's short term plans for trying to
>get the team to win but might not fit the clubs long term plans for Suppan.
    
    If I were primarily a Red Sox fan, I'd hope like anything that's
    exactly what he does.  Suppan's young enough that pitch counts are
    very important, and Kennedy's shown no particular realization of
    this in the past (for a great example, look at Rick Helling).
    
    JOe
63.2094ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 29 1996 12:3111
    
    Is it true that Roger Clemens got slapped silly last night and lost
    to a rookie pitcher from Oakland.  Heck, Boston would be lucky to
    get a guy like Wayne Kirby from Cleveland for Clemens...!
    
    Mo's getting good press on his so called impressive season, problem is,
    does he lead Belle in any category?  HRs?  AVE? SLG?  2B?  RBI?  R?
    
    Answer - NO?
    
    
63.2095Cannot tell a psycho from a normal human being...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed May 29 1996 13:429
    
>    problem is,
>    does he lead Belle in any category?
    
    Just one, MVP awards.  Mo 1, Joey 0.
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2096That should do it I think.STRATA::BTOWERWed May 29 1996 14:484
    Any other questions grono?
    
    Re-1: Beautiful.........
    
63.2097POWDML::GARBARINOWed May 29 1996 16:0519
Haven't been in here in awhile, but I believe Albert "Joey" Belle has
serious personal problems.  It won't surprise me one bit to see his
name in a headline in the future (even when he's out of baseball)
regarding *serious* criminal violence of some sort.

And Tony Phillips ain't far behind.  This guy has a HUGE ego and
attitude problem (which seems to have surfaced since he left Detroit
and became a starter...under LaRussa, I might add).  I'd like to see
someone on an opposing team clean his clock.


re:  Clemens to Cleveland

Cleveland will pay *more* for any decent pitcher now that they've
surfaced as a winning team...unless there are no other bidders,
which is impossible in today's MLB.  So SHU-U-U-U-EY won't be
the *significant* part of any Clemens deal.  He assed was kicked
so badly at the ML level that he'd have to remedy that to be
regarded so highly.
63.2098But Jimmy decided to be the peaceful enforcerEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed May 29 1996 16:2413
                                                              
> And Tony Phillips ain't far behind.  This guy has a HUGE ego and
> attitude problem (which seems to have surfaced since he left Detroit
> and became a starter...under LaRussa, I might add).  I'd like to see
> someone on an opposing team clean his clock.
    
    Phillips has a bit of a temper, and has been invloved in a couple 
    of scrapes in games against the Sox in recent years.  Jim Rice had
    to take him task on one occasion when Phillips was foolhardy enough
    to want to mess with Jim Ed...
    
    glenn
    
63.2099PECAD8::CHILDSWed May 29 1996 16:594
what was so beautiful about it Bruce? Bottom line is the fools that vote let
their prejudices against Belle cloud their judgement. Stats favor Belle, final
team standings favor Belle, and historical significance of stats (50 HR's and 50
Dbl's) favor Belle. Truth be told Belle was ROBBED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
63.2100AlSpurt has an MVP Goose Egg! HahahahahahaSTRATA::BTOWERWed May 29 1996 17:109
    What I thought was beautiful was the the MO 1 Joey 0 comment. I didn't
    say the writers were beautiful with their pick.  
    
    Grono jumped in for his daily stirring of the pot and in my view
    slammed for it 8>). 
    
    Bottom line MO 1 Alspurt 0  Nuf Ced!
    
    PS: Nuf Ced. Is that the right pronunciation George?
63.2101ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed May 29 1996 17:249
>what was so beautiful about it Bruce? Bottom line is the fools that vote let
>their prejudices against Belle cloud their judgement. Stats favor Belle, final
>team standings favor Belle, and historical significance of stats (50 HR's and
>50 Dbl's) favor Belle. Truth be told Belle was ROBBED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    No more so than Salmon (my pick), Valentin, Thomas, Thome, and a few
    others...
    
    Joe
63.2102POWDML::GARBARINOWed May 29 1996 17:594
>Truth be told Belle was ROBBED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

One of the more *pleasant* injustices, which, we can only hope, will
continue to happen as long as he's in baseball.
63.2103ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 29 1996 18:0924
    
    Using the "ass kicked" in the majors logic, I guess all the
    talk about Suppan is just hot air.  Heck, the guy must be a
    stiff, look at his major league stats from last year.
    
    1-2 record, 5.96 ERA, 1.50 ratio
    
    Clearly he's a stiff who shouldn't be given a shot at the major
    league level.
    
    My comment was that a package of two pitching prospects from the
    Indians organization (plus possibly fringe minor leaguers) could
    get Clemens... maybe its three prospects, but one will not be
    Colon or Wright - PERIOD!
    
    The package could include one of: Shuey or Graves - both have
    been highly impressive in AAA and Boston has no closer.  One
    of: Lopez, Ogea, Roa, Embree and possibly Kirkreit.
    
    This is the 90's... there's no such thing as an untouchable,
    Boston can belly up to the table and admit their team sucks and
    get something for Clemens or they can take their chances with
    the draft picks... and if the past is any indication of the 
    future, they won't do too well with the draft picks.
63.2104ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 29 1996 18:104
    
    Belle has hit 65 HRs in his last 150 games... put that in your pipe and
    smoke it.  Anyone who thinks Vaughn is a better offensive player than 
    Belle is simply biased.
63.2105rorrimSTRATA::BTOWERWed May 29 1996 18:121
    Biased? Did you say Biased? Quick, find a mirror.
63.2106CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 29 1996 18:2117
RE                     <<< Note 63.2104 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

>    Belle has hit 65 HRs in his last 150 games... put that in your pipe and
>    smoke it.  Anyone who thinks Vaughn is a better offensive player than 
>    Belle is simply biased.

  I'm not sure anyone is making that claim. I believe that just about everyone
agrees that Bell has the better stats and if MVP was based on stats alone he'd
be a lock to get it. 

  However when you consider things like leadership, positive influence in the
club house, etc then Vaughn moves up on the list and Bell falls off sharply. 

  Remember, this is the "Most Valuable" player award, not the "Best offense"
player award or the Golden Glove.

  George 
63.2107CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 29 1996 18:2311
RE                     <<< Note 63.2100 by STRATA::BTOWER >>>
    
>    PS: Nuf Ced. Is that the right pronunciation George?

  Yes, that's exactly how it sounds.

  Speaking of pitchers, Hershiser, who's now ripping along at 4-4 with a 6.17
ERA really got pounded by the Rangers last night. He went 1 2/3 innings giving
up 8 hits and 6 runs.

  George
63.2108Two pitchers past their primesTNPUBS::NAZZAROBest of luck, Marcus!Wed May 29 1996 18:263
    Speaking of getting pounded, what was Roger's line lasted night?
    
    NAZZ
63.2109ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed May 29 1996 18:3911
    
    George,
    
>  However when you consider things like leadership, positive influence in the
>club house, etc then Vaughn moves up on the list and Bell falls off sharply. 
    
    Why do you claim this?  I've _never_ heard Belle criticized by his
    teammates or Grover for his leadership or clubhouse influence; quite
    the opposite, I've heard him praised for it.
    
    Joe
63.2110ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 29 1996 18:413
    
    Joe, the reason he's claiming that is because he's making wild
    assumptions based on the limited data that he has.
63.2111ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 29 1996 18:4323
You are a sportswriter and you just received your MVP ballot for 1998.  The 
following two player are the top two contenders. 

              AB  R   H   TB  D   T   HR RBI  BB  SO SB CS AVE  
             === === === === === === === === === === == == ===== 
Vo Maughn    550  98 165 316  28   3  39 126  68 150 11  4 0.300 
Bruce Tower  548  79 157 280  15   9  30 126  63 200 24  8 0.286 
     

Vo Maughn is a malcontent off the field.  Bruce Tower is active in the
community - he does Pepsi commercials, works with children, helps out
at church bake sales, and helps elderly people cross the road - you
know what it's like in this state with the drivers!

Neither player plays a key defensive position, and neither is exactly
a gold glove player.

Vo Maughn plays on Buggs Moran, a team that ran away with their division, 
clinching it in early June.  Bruce Tower played on a team that exceeded
expectations and won their division despite preseason predictions of a
3rd place finish.

Which player would you vote for MVP?
63.2112No BrainerSTRATA::BTOWERWed May 29 1996 18:541
    I'd vote for me but I'd be biased 8>).
63.2113ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 29 1996 18:563
    
    Any similarities to person living or dead, or actual events is purely
    intentional, er I mean coincidental.
63.2114the next George FosterCONSLT::MOYNIHANWed May 29 1996 19:018
    
    >    Belle has hit 65 HRs in his last 150 games... put that in your
    pipe and smoke it.  Anyone who thinks Vaughn is a better offensive
    player than Belle is simply biased
    
     I heard/read it was 65 HR's in his last 162 games. Keeping in mind that 
    the last 20 Homers were in April and May and not August and September.
    
63.2115PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Wed May 29 1996 19:1812
    
    
    not a big mystery. When a player has a "reputation" tagged on him that
    is not favorable in the eyes of the media, he will not win the MVP.
    
    The samething happened to Strawberry in '89. The guy had a great year
    but the Mets lost in NLCS to the Dodgers. The MVP went to Kirk Gibson.
    Gibson had a nice year but not as nice as Strawberry.  Gibson won
    because he was labled as a hard-worker, huslter who was the media's
    little darling. Samething happened to Barry Bonds as well. Belle is no
    different and until he cleans up his image with the media, he will
    probably never win it.
63.2116PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Wed May 29 1996 19:183
    
    
    oops I meant 1988, not 1989.
63.2117BIGQ::MCKAYWed May 29 1996 19:316
    TAP TAP Tower hits 30 home runs.......What did you pull out his 1982 
    stats when he still had home run power!!!!!
    
    8*)
    
    Jimbo
63.2118The Gym ain't helpin.STRATA::BTOWERWed May 29 1996 19:371
    I keep tellin ya, It's the restricted flight balls!!!
63.2119WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed May 29 1996 19:384
    
    
    
    MMMMMMMM Super Red Dots.....
63.2120Amswer me this one.STRATA::BTOWERWed May 29 1996 19:442
    OK. You have just received your sports noter MVP Ballot. Would anyone
    besides a name that rhymes with BONO vote for themselves.
63.2121ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed May 29 1996 21:0628
    
    So what if he hit 20 in April and May...?  The guy can't win.  Last
    year the pundits are all saying - well he hit all those HRs late in
    the season in Cleveland when they already had the division wrapped up,
    including a ton in August and September.  This year we hear, well 
    he hit a load in April and May and not August and September... maybe
    you should go back and look at last years numbers.  *AND* if you
    followed the Indians, you'd know that many of this 21 HRs this year
    were great winners or game breakers.
    
    
    
    
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.2114                    CLEVELAND INDIANS                   2114 of 2120
CONSLT::MOYNIHAN                                      8 lines  29-MAY-1996 15:01
                          -< the next George Foster >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    >    Belle has hit 65 HRs in his last 150 games... put that in your
    pipe and smoke it.  Anyone who thinks Vaughn is a better offensive
    player than Belle is simply biased
    
     I heard/read it was 65 HR's in his last 162 games. Keeping in mind that 
    the last 20 Homers were in April and May and not August and September.
    
63.2122CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 29 1996 21:3219
RE       <<< Note 63.2109 by ROCK::HUBER "From Sinker to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>    Why do you claim this?  I've _never_ heard Belle criticized by his
>    teammates or Grover for his leadership or clubhouse influence; quite
>    the opposite, I've heard him praised for it.
    
  His team mates are not the ones doing the voting. The impression that the
press seems to have, true or not, is that Bell is not a leadership kind of
guy.

  Now maybe he's the picture of inspiration inside the club house and
only reverts to being nasty when the press is around but the simple fact
is that the MVP is the guy who the PRESS thinks is the best player and
all around wonderfull guy.

  You can't deny that Bell has not exactly done a great job of campaigning
for MVP among those who cast the votes.

  George
63.2123SNAX::ERICKSONWed May 29 1996 22:2110
    
    	Interesting stat that ESPN had the other day, Which pitcher has
    been given the most run support per game, since 1994?
    
    
    
    	Answer: Charles Nagy at 7.21 runs per game
    
    
    Ron
63.2124ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 30 1996 00:1911
    
    re: .2122
    
    Interesting point by George...forget if Belle actually *IS* a team leader
    and there is no proof that he isn't... in fact, you always see Belle
    as one of the first players out of the dugout when a teammate hits an
    HR or does something good at the plate... lets trust the press and
    their impression of the situation.
    
    Is this the same George that said "ignore the press impression of OJs
    guilt"?
63.2125CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 30 1996 12:1014
  I didn't say we should trust the press. What I'm saying is that it is the
press that votes for these awards and it is their impression, right or wrong,
that determines who will win.

  Regardless of what Bell is really like behind closed doors, he's done quite
a bit to alienate the press. I'm not saying that's bad, I'm not saying that
means that he doesn't deserve an award, all I'm saying is that if you bite
the hand that feeds you you are not likely to get fed.

  Bell, for what ever reason, treats the press like krap and they return the
favor when it comes time to vote for MVP.

  George
63.2126Once moreILBBAK::SILVESTRISoar with the Eagles!Thu May 30 1996 12:4018
	Sorry that this report is not first hand, I wasn't there,
	just relaying what was reported in the media ... :-)

	But Big Bad Albert is at it again ... seems that after one of
	his homeruns in Texas that Albert wanted the ball ... so security
	goes into the stands, finds the fan that caught the homerun,
	and escort him down to the clubhouse ... Albert says he wants 
	the ball, the fan says "Sure" just give me an autographed ball in
	return ... Albert Says "No", claims the fans in left field were
	harrassing him, and swears at the fan ... the fan tells Albert
	to pound sand ...

	The Indians have apologized to the fan and promised him a ball
	signed by all the Indians (except Albert) ...

	Will this guy ever grow up??

	Vinny
63.2127POWDML::GARBARINOThu May 30 1996 13:1016
>	Albert Says "No", claims the fans in left field were
>	harrassing him, and swears at the fan ... the fan tells Albert
>	to pound sand ...

>	The Indians have apologized to the fan and promised him a ball
>	signed by all the Indians (except Albert) ...

>	Will this guy ever grow up??


It ain't a matter of growing up, he's just a mean, nasty S-O-B Vinny.

I hope he pulls a hammy and stays out a few weeks, thereby messin' up
his season totals so the MVP argument becomes mute.

Hey Groaner, will Cleveland even attempt to re-sign this headache ?
63.2128ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu May 30 1996 13:147
    
    Cleveland _has_ attempted to resign Belle.  They've offered him
    a very generous contract.
    
    Personally, I'd offer arbitration, and let him go if he insists.
    
    Joe
63.2129PECAD8::CHILDSThu May 30 1996 14:357
Well Albert just did that fan a big favor. That ball will be worth twice as
much now. Why did the fan need to hold Albert hostage? Why did he have to have
something to give something up? Me me Me of the seventies........I'd like to
believe that had he given the ball to Albert without asking for anything in
return Albert would have then turned around and given him something as a sign
of appreciation. Given his charity work that wouldn't have been out of the
relm of propability.......
63.2130I think Belle's "leadership" is tolerated because he producesEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu May 30 1996 14:4411
>    Why do you claim this?  I've _never_ heard Belle criticized by his
>    teammates or Grover for his leadership or clubhouse influence; quite
>    the opposite, I've heard him praised for it.
    
    That depends.  That depends on whether you take a comment like "you 
    don't understand.  He's not like us; he's crazy" as a compliment.  
    Personally, I'd be flattered...
    
    glenn
    
63.2131Albert a shining example to us all...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu May 30 1996 14:5213
>	the fan says "Sure" just give me an autographed ball in
>	return ... Albert Says "No", claims the fans in left field were
>	harrassing him, and swears at the fan ... the fan tells Albert
>	to pound sand ...

    The fan should just tell Albert what Albert told SI, that Albert 
    can "kiss my <black/white/Hispanic/Asian/Eskimo/other> ass".  
    That way, the fan can claim that he's "misunderstood", and be 
    lauded for his great leadership and civic-minded spirit...
    
    glenn
    
63.2132POWDML::GARBARINOThu May 30 1996 15:284
>    Cleveland _has_ attempted to resign Belle.  They've offered him
>    a very generous contract.

I thought they pulles their last offer off the table.  ???
63.2133PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Thu May 30 1996 16:442
    Isnt Bonds nearing the end of his contract? Perhaps Cleveland could
    sign him and leave Belle go.
63.2134CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 30 1996 17:197
  If you were the Cleveland GM, why would you necessarily want to let Bell go? 

  The guy is probably most powerful offensive threat in baseball. You can
hardly take as a given that you will land Bonds.

  George
63.2135POWDML::GARBARINOThu May 30 1996 19:565
>  If you were the Cleveland GM, why would you necessarily want to let Bell go? 

Does Cleveland have enough financial resources to pay him what he wants,
*AND* satisfy their future free agents ?  Do they consider him a *problem* ?
Do they have enough talent on the team to win without him ?
63.2136PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Thu May 30 1996 19:577
>>   The guy is probably most powerful offensive threat in baseball. You can
>> hardly take as a given that you will land Bonds.
    
    Cleveland has the cash and the team to land someone like Bonds. Though
    Belle is a powerful offensive threat, Bonds is a more "complete"
    player. If Bonds is a lesser "powerful offensive threat" he will more
    than make up for it with his fielding.
63.2137ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu May 30 1996 20:3115
    
>Does Cleveland have enough financial resources to pay him what he wants,
>*AND* satisfy their future free agents ?  
    
    All of them?  No.
    
    The key ones?  Possibly.
    
>Do they consider him a *problem* ?
    
    Yes.
    
>Do they have enough talent on the team to win without him ?
    
    Yes.
63.2138CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 30 1996 20:3528
RE                    <<< Note 63.2135 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>

>Does Cleveland have enough financial resources to pay him what he wants,
>*AND* satisfy their future free agents ?  Do they consider him a *problem* ?
>Do they have enough talent on the team to win without him ?

  For Cleveland the future is now. Sure those pitching prospects look great and
maybe they will come around but that's something of a question mark which will
get answered soon enough considering the geriatric starting rotation they are
now using. 

  If there is money to be spent, now's the time to use it to take two or three
really good shots at the World Series from now through '98.

RE      <<< Note 63.2136 by PTOSS1::SCHRAMME "Eric Schramm (412)829-0710" >>>

>    Cleveland has the cash and the team to land someone like Bonds. Though
>    Belle is a powerful offensive threat, Bonds is a more "complete"
>    player. If Bonds is a lesser "powerful offensive threat" he will more
>    than make up for it with his fielding.

  Unless they have some reason to believe Bonds would play in Cleveland that's
one gigantic *IF*. Even if they do believe they could snag Bonds it might make
more sense to break the piggy bank, take Bonds and put Bell at DH. 

  Again, if there is money in Cleveland, now's the time to spend it.

  George
63.2139ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 30 1996 21:259
    
    George, I hate to tell you this, but winning is contagious.  Take two
    examples - Cleveland and Boston.
    
    Who would have ever believed Dennis Martinez, Orel Hershiser or Jack 
    McDowell would have signed as free agents with Cleveland?  It doesn't
    take a genius to figure out that players want to play for winners.
    What great free agents did the Red Sox attract this season?  It will
    only get worse for the Sox if they continue to lose.  
63.2140MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu May 30 1996 22:0411
>    Cleveland has the cash and the team to land someone like Bonds. 
>    Though Belle is a powerful offensive threat, Bonds is a more 
>    "complete" player. If Bonds is a lesser "powerful offensive threat" 
>    he will more than make up for it with his fielding.

	Eric, are you trying to bait me into making a "Mr October_NOT"
	comment?  I refuse to be dragged into making any such comment.



	billl
63.2141EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri May 31 1996 00:4016
    
>	Eric, are you trying to bait me into making a "Mr October_NOT"
>	comment?  I refuse to be dragged into making any such comment.

    Don't expect it to continue if/when the Giants break through again,
    though.  Ironically enough, Bonds was selected in some kind of poll
    of GMs earlier this year as the "most clutch hitter" in the game, and 
    he always has been good for those 9th-inning heroics, in the regular 
    season, at least...
    
    glenn
    
    


   
63.2142SNAX::ERICKSONFri May 31 1996 13:1810
    
    	Its standard practice that if a player wants a ball returned he
    negociates with the fan, giving the guy a signed ball in return is
    a small price to pay.
    	Ex. Ken Griffey hit his 200th HR at Fenway and wanted the ball
    back. Griffey offered the kid a signed bat, signed ball, plus promised
    him 4 box seat tickets to a game, when Seattle returns to Boston in
    August.
    
    Ron
63.2143ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri May 31 1996 14:005
    
    Its a capitalistic system.  I have something you want, you must pay the
    asking price.  If you don't want to pay, then so be it.  Albert wanted
    the ball but didn't want to give him an autographed ball in return, so
    what's the big deal.
63.2144CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri May 31 1996 14:1113
RE                     <<< Note 63.2139 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

>    George, I hate to tell you this, but winning is contagious.  Take two
>    examples - Cleveland and Boston.
    
  I'm not sure which of the points I made contradicts this.

  I believe I said the Indians should sign Bell and if they have a shot at
Bonds, sigh him as well and move Bell to DH rather than letting Bell go.

  Do you disagree with that? If so, what does it have to do with Boston?

  George
63.2145Indian Assault and battery's STRATA::BTOWERMon Jun 03 1996 13:3121
    Re .2094
    
           Hey Grono, What a difference a weekend makes huh. Since you
    waited till Alspurt caught MO in RBI's last week to make your "so
    called impressive season' remark I figured I'd jump in right now
    since Alspurt didn't hold the lead for very long. Looks like their
    both just having "so called impressive seasons". 
    
           Why don't we just wait till the end of the year and see who
    ends up with the best "so called impressive numbers". Cuz if MO at 
    least stays close, Alspurt has already done enough to blow his second
    consecutive MVP award already. I know the Cleveland people love him.
    I would love to have him on my team, but the majority of the rest of
    the baseball public can't stand the guy. Too bad he just can't seem to
    play the fame game as well as he hits balls around baseball parks, or
    throws them at players, or reporters with camera's. 
    
           Nice take out of the Milwaukee second baseman. What was he half
    alspurts(cheapshot) size. And hey let's not forget Tavarez body slammin
    that real mean umpire. Yeah Cleveland showed a lot of class this 
    past weekend that's for sure.  
63.2146ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 03 1996 14:1720
    
>           Nice take out of the Milwaukee second baseman. What was he half
>    alspurts(cheapshot) size.
    
    And he was in the basepath, and the double play was in order.
    Sorry, but Belle did nothing wrong - not the greatest display of
    sportsmanship, perhaps, but he _did_ succeed in breaking up the
    double play.
    
>     And hey let's not forget Tavarez body slammin
>    that real mean umpire.
    
    After the umpire came up from behind and grabbed Tavarez.  Tavarez
    didn't know _who_ he was body slamming; the umpire said afterwards
    he would report as much.
    
    (Not to defend Tavarez's other actions; he and Matheny both deserve
     fines and/or suspensions.)
    
    Joe
63.2147ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jun 03 1996 14:224
    
    If all players put up comparable numbers this year as last and Mo wins
    the MVP, it will be a slap in Belle's face, as well as Salmon, Edgar
    Martinez and Frank Thomas just to mention a few.
63.2148ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 03 1996 14:3114
    
    Thought:
    
    Is Thome the best unrecognized player in the game today?
    
    Last year he put up a season that would fit beautifully into
    Schmidt's career, except that his batting average was higher.
    
    This year, he's doing the the same thing again.
    
    He didn't get named to the all-star game last year, or get even a
    single mvp vote (while Wade Boggs did).
    
    Joe
63.2149huh?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jun 03 1996 14:383
>    Is Thome the best unrecognized player in the game today?

Who?
63.2150ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 03 1996 14:392
    
    B^)
63.2151POWDML::GARBARINOMon Jun 03 1996 14:4219
>    And he was in the basepath, and the double play was in order.
>    Sorry, but Belle did nothing wrong

Most of the country doesn't agree with you Joe.  Listening to talk-radio
shows, network sports reports and reading various newspaper articles,
N-O-N-E focused on Belle's break-up of the double-play.  The *news*
from this incident was "further proof that this guy is a BAD ASS".
What he did, in my mind, is worse than a pitcher admitting to throwing
at a guy's head.  I hope he gets suspended for at least a week...ditto
Tavarez.


The Cleveland front office can't be enjoying the press the team's been
getting lately.  Hopefully, merchandise revenue will start to fall.
And maybe most fans will be rooting for the Yankees when the two teams
meet in the playoffs !!


Imagine that...
63.2152POWDML::GARBARINOMon Jun 03 1996 14:433
>    Is Thome the best unrecognized player in the game today?

No, Paul Sorrento is !
63.2153ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jun 03 1996 14:528
    
    Paul Sorrento couldn't even carry Thome's jock.  He was easily replaced
    in Cleveland by Franco, while Thome is clearly the best offensive 3B in
    the American League.
    
    As far as the Belle incident goes, who cares what the press focused on?
    Belle made a good clean play at 2B.  I bet the 2B gets out of the way 
    next time and eats the ball.
63.2154SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jun 03 1996 15:0214
    
    	I don't think Belle should be fined or suspended for what he did,
    the 2nd baseman was in the basepath and deserved to get run over. Did he
    deserve to get a broken jaw, NO, but Albert's intent was to jar the
    ball loose not break his jaw. If he was coming in to homeplate and
    ran over the catcher, breaking the cathers jaw, nothing would be
    said.
    	The pitchers who threw at Cleveland players in retaliation should
    be suspended, as well as Tavarez for throwing behind the batter, which
    caused the brawl in the first place. Tavarez has to get suspended just
    because he threw an umpire to the ground, it doesn't matter that he
    didn't know it was an umpire..
    
    Ron
63.2155Deliberate attempt to injureTNPUBS::NAZZAROBest of luck, Marcus!Mon Jun 03 1996 15:139
    Give me a break, PUH-LEEEEEZE!  Albert's intent was to jar the ball
    loose?  Sure it was - and Santa will be very good to you this
    Christmas.  His intent was to smah that little guy into next week, and
    that's nearly what he did.  I only wish Vina had whipped the ball at
    his head as Belle was walking off the field.  In my 43 years of
    watching baseball, I have NEVER seem anyone hit a second baseman
    anywhere near as hard as that.
    
    NAZZ
63.2156ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jun 03 1996 15:154
    
    Nice to see that NAZZ is a mind reader and knows what thought's are in
    Albert's mind.  PUH-LEEEEEZE!  GIVE ME A BREAK, its people like you
    that are part of the problem.  
63.2157The brewers get involved in a lot of em'CNTROL::SALMONMon Jun 03 1996 15:263
    I saw a player (don't remember who) interviewed on ESPN this morning
    who had a great quote. He said the 98% of all fights in the American
    League involve the Brewers! Got me thinking!
63.2158what I heardHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jun 03 1996 15:344
I think that's supposed to read, " 98% of all fights in the American
League involve the Brew!~"...

TTom
63.2159ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 03 1996 15:3535
    
>    Give me a break, PUH-LEEEEEZE!  Albert's intent was to jar the ball
>    loose?
    
    That's what he's said; he _did_ bring his arm to the level Vina
    had his glove.
    
>    And he was in the basepath, and the double play was in order.
>    Sorry, but Belle did nothing wrong
    
>    Most of the country doesn't agree with you Joe.  Listening to talk-radio
>    shows, network sports reports and reading various newspaper articles,
>    N-O-N-E focused on Belle's break-up of the double-play.  The *news*
>    from this incident was "further proof that this guy is a BAD ASS".
    
    Yeah, I know that, and I'm not surprised.  Belle _is_ a jerk sometimes
    (and frequently at times), and so has developed a bad reputation with
    the media.  And so you hear _nothing_ about the fact that Matheny
    did something _clearly_ illegal within the rules, tidbits about
    Tavarez's actions, and the focus is on a _legal_ play by Belle.
    The 2nd base umpire was quoted as saying it was a legal play; Belle
    was not ejected, and did not do anything when the predictable hbp
    followed.
    
>    What he did, in my mind, is worse than a pitcher admitting to throwing
>    at a guy's
    
    OK - why?
    
    It happens to catchers every day, and you hear _nothing_.  Other
    infielders routinely stay out of the path of baserunners.  If Vina's
    stupid enough to stand right in front of Belle with a double play in
    order, he's going to be run over.
    
    Joe
63.2160ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 03 1996 15:379
    
    RE: 98%...
    
    Jack McDowell's the one who said it; he's clearly exaggerating, but
    he does have something of a point.
    
    All the more reason baseball needs a commissioner asap.
    
    Joe 
63.2161IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jun 03 1996 15:4012
Look at the videotape again and try to claim that Albert was trying to jar
the ball loose.  Do it without smirking.

You don't go up that high with a forearm in order to do that.

It'll be really interesting to see if he gets drilled flush in the face
with a throw anytime soon.

On the other hand, I can buy Tavarez's action of flipping the ump - the guy
did come at him from behind in the middle of a fight.  But as someone stated
earlier, he *will* be sanctioned, since it was done to an umpire.
63.2162AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Jun 03 1996 16:0016
    
    
     What Belle did was not against the rules plain and simple.  Stupid
    incredibly, but not against the rules.  The reason why Belle didn't
    get tossed is only a manager can get tossed for having a pitcher
    throw at an opponent not another player having a pitcher throw at one.
    If anyone thinks what Belle did was just clean hard nose baseball I
    think you should think again.  He was quoted saying if someone throws
    at him the other team will pay.  The count was 3-2 and he got plunked
    on the shoulder.  You don't hit someone with a full count.  He better
    learn the game of baseball.  Belle is the biggest jerk around and I
    think baseball would be better off without dopes like that.  Granted
    he is a very talented dope but a dope none the less.  Belle will get
    his its just a matter of time.  One of these days he'll be on first
    with a bullet hit to 2nd and the SS will make an errant throw right
    into his chest.  One way or another he'll get whats comming to him.  
63.2163CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 03 1996 16:1913
RE       <<< Note 63.2148 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>    Is Thome the best unrecognized player in the game today?
    
  I guess it depends on which fans you are talking about. Someone on TV
the other day said they saw some study that selected Tim Salmon as the best
unrecognized player in the game today.

  I was somewhat surprised, I thought everyone recognized Tim Salmon as one
of the best outfielders in the game today but I guess he slipped by the
people being surveyed in said study.

  George
63.2164PECAD8::CHILDSMon Jun 03 1996 17:054
hey Jerry if some SS takes your advice, he'd better go for his head cause if
if he hits him  in the chest the ball just going to bounce off and make Albert
angry.
63.2165ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 03 1996 17:4511
    
    Another thought for the day:
    
    Albert Belle - the Dick Allen of the 90s?
    
    Re: Salmon.
    
    Hmmm... I think Salmon's underrecognized (realize, I'd have given
    him the MVP last year), but not to the extent of Thome...
    
    Joe
63.2166ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jun 03 1996 18:275
    
    Can you name the stiff (non-prospect) with the following AAA numbers:
    
    2-2, 4 Saves, 17 games, 0.91 ERA, 29 2/3 IP (12 hits, 9 bbs), *51*
    STRIKEOUTS.
63.2167CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 03 1996 18:386
  As of Friday:

                                  W  L    ERA   G SV  IP     H   R  ER  BB  SO
    Shuey, Paul              .... 2  2   0.94  16  3  28.2  11   3   3   9  48

  George
63.2168ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jun 03 1996 18:502
    
    George, clearly the guy is a stiff.
63.2169CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 03 1996 18:524
  Hope not, I just picked him up on my SNAL team.

  George
63.2170POWDML::GARBARINOMon Jun 03 1996 20:2314
>>    What he did, in my mind, is worse than a pitcher admitting to throwing
>>    at a guy's
    
>    OK - why?

Belle (IMO) deliberately hit the 2B in the face with his forearm...he wasn't
trying to jar the ball loose from him (unless he thought by knocking him
out cold he'd drop the ball).  A pitcher will throw at a guy's head, but
Belle's forearm will be more accurate than a pitched ball, and the guy
has less time (NO TIME !) to avoid it.  It was a deliberate attempt to
injure...no far from a knuckle-sandwich.

This ain't the end of it for Albert Belle.  The road is going to be a
very trying time for him this year.
63.2171POWDML::GARBARINOMon Jun 03 1996 20:4611
Belle, Tavarez and Matheny all got 5-game suspensions.

Budig said this regarding Belle's action:

	"The AL will not tolerate an act that put in serious jeopardy
	 the safety of a player...Albert Belle is being suspended for
	 five games beginning Tuesday, June 4th, since his action not
	 only threatened injury to an individual but also led to the
	 later disruption of the game."

Guess Budig didn't see Belle's forearm as good, clean baseball.
63.2172ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jun 03 1996 21:213
    
    I wonder if Selig has any vested interest in the matter - like is he
    affiliated with any of the teams?
63.2173NQOS01::nqsrv133.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYMon Jun 03 1996 22:243
no, he's with the Brewers

brews (no relation) 
63.2174ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 04 1996 00:444
    
    I rest my case.  The umpires says the play at 2B was clean.  Selig
    who's with the Brewers (the opponents) suspends Belle anyways.  What a
    joke.
63.2175Albert in Denial...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 04 1996 00:469
    
>    Albert's mind.  PUH-LEEEEEZE!  GIVE ME A BREAK, its people like you
>    that are part of the problem.  
    
    What problem?  I was under the impression that there was no problem...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2176Grono steps in another pile...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 04 1996 00:589
    
>    I rest my case.  The umpires says the play at 2B was clean.  Selig
>    who's with the Brewers (the opponents) suspends Belle anyways.  What a
>    joke.
    
    That's Budig, not Selig, you big dummy... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
63.2177ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 04 1996 01:044
    
    Glenn <pause>, is it true <pause>, you can not <pause> throw the long
    ball any more?
    
63.2178EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 04 1996 01:066
    
    Very true... but I can still hit a little bit...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2179ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 04 1996 01:073
    
    Glenn, is it true, you can not hit the long ball any more?
    
63.2180ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 04 1996 10:513
    
    Selig - Budig, what's the difference?  Has anyone ever seen Bud Selig
    and Budig in a room at the same time?
63.2181CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jun 04 1996 12:2112
  I saw the tape on the news last night and this morning and I agree with the 5
game suspension. Clearly Bell was out to deck the guy and the for arm he gave
him was not necessary to break up the play. If the Ump didn't call it then
it was a bad call.

  That being said, while Bell deserves the 5 game suspension, that's all he
deserves. In addition to the suspension he's been thrown at and no doubt this
will cost him what little chance he may have had of getting MVP. That should
be more than enough, I see no reason anyone should cause Bell any further
aggravation for this incident. Once he sits out the 5 games it should be over.

  George
63.2182WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Jun 04 1996 13:0920
    
    
         AND NOW A PO----EM
    
         Ode to Joey
    
      Joey, Joey,where you been.
      Serving your suspension in the state Pen?
      Running over kids,Hitting people with balls.
      Breaking peoples noses and putting up walls.
    
      Albert than Joey, Joey than AL.
      Corkin your bat, don't have any pals?
      MVP yes? MVP no!
      Don't clear the mantle they gave it to MO.
    
    
    
    Chap
      
63.2183...and there will be more.POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 04 1996 13:233
>Once he sits out the 5 games it should be over.

Until the next incident.
63.2184Tick... tick... tick...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 04 1996 13:291
    
63.2185SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jun 04 1996 13:3016
    
    	All I know is that money has ruined all professional sports. As
    much as I hate Cleveland and Albert BellE, these millionaire primadonas
    have to stop whining and complaining. As I said in a earlier note, if
    it happened at home plate, NOTHING would have been done. I saw the
    replay about 10 times yesterday, Vina had his glove up around his
    face. Albert tried knocking the ball out of his glove and pushed Vina's
    own arm/glove into his own face.
    	I'd rather watch Albert BellE bowl someone over playing aggressive
    baseball, then a lazy bum like Jose Canseco. Canseco probably would
    have been taking his helmet off and walking off the field when he got
    tagged.
       I can see Tavarez getting 5 games because there is no excuse for
    touching an umpire/ref in any sport.
    
    Ron
63.2186ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 04 1996 13:3525
    
>	"The AL will not tolerate an act that put in serious jeopardy
>	 the safety of a player...Albert Belle is being suspended for
>	 five games beginning Tuesday, June 4th, since his action not
>	 only threatened injury to an individual but also led to the
>	 later disruption of the game."

    If he truly believes this, then there should be suspensions handed out
    whenever a player slides hard into second base, or runs over a
    catcher.
    
    I still think this is ridiculous.  I've seen the replay five or so
    times now, and do _not_ believe that it's clear that Belle's intent
    was to do bodily harm, rather than to break up the double play.
    
>Guess Budig didn't see Belle's forearm as good, clean baseball.
    
    I'm not sure it _is_ clean baseball.  But it is legal baseball, and
    therefore should _not_ result in a suspension.  To read into Belle's
    action an intent to hurt Vina is unreasonable.
    
    FWIW, I was happy to see the other suspensions; if anything, I
    think Tavarez's was a bit light, but I'm not going to complain.
    
    Joe                                                            
63.2187ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 04 1996 13:379
    
>       I can see Tavarez getting 5 games because there is no excuse for
>    touching an umpire/ref in any sport.
    
    Right; and given the unintentional nature of the incident, a light
    penalty was in order.  Given that he's a pitcher, I expected about 7
    games.
    
    Joe
63.2188Albert's rep cost him 5STRATA::BTOWERTue Jun 04 1996 13:4919
    re: .2185
    
           Mike Lynch said much the same thing on the Channel 5 sports
    last night. He said for years Pete Rose was commended for such plays.
    He also pointed out that earlier in the game Albert was tagged out and
    the double play completed. He made sure that it didn't happen a second
    time. His opinion was it was a very hard hit but CLEAN and the only
    reason he got a 5 game suspension was because of all his past
    indiscretions. 
    
            Bob Lobel on channel 4 was on the other side of the fence and
    felt Belle deserved even more of a suspension. Said if the Milwaukee
    guy who charged the mound got 5 then Albert deserved at least double.
    
            The more I watch the play Albert certainly had every right to
    the basepath and wiped the guy completely out. I feel he was definitely
    trying to hurt the guy not just jar the ball loose. Although, I also agree
    that nobody else in baseball would have gotten a five game suspension 
    for it. Maybe 1 but not 5.                    
63.2189CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jun 04 1996 13:5217
RE                     <<< Note 63.2185 by SNAX::ERICKSON >>>

>    	All I know is that money has ruined all professional sports. As
>    much as I hate Cleveland and Albert BellE, these millionaire primadonas
>    have to stop whining and complaining. 

  Where is the relationship between money and the forarm that Bell gave the
infielder? I just don't see it. Was it money that made Ty Cobb slide into 2nd
with his spikes up? And if money does this why don't all the players play this
way?

  Baseball players have been getting paid to play baseball since 1869 and in
that time I've seen no evidence that it makes guys play dirty baseball. If
anything baseball is much cleaner now than it was in the 19th century when
the players were making little more than a middle class wage.

  George
63.2190POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 04 1996 14:039
I don't recall Rose going DIRECTLY to someone's face with a forearm
while trying to breakup a doubleplay or a play at the plate.  From
the very first instant I saw the replay it was clear to me that
Belle threw his forearm at Vina's face and there was intent to
inflict pain.  You can watch it 100 times, but if you believe that's
clean play you're going to see it that way.

I have no problem with spikes up or burying your shoulder into a
guy.  But what Belle did ain't part of the game...rules or no rules.
63.2191it must be the haidHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 04 1996 14:1512
No I don't believe it's a clean play. Only that it's within the MLB 
rules to allow this. I also think it was a real cheap shot.

I have no doubt that the forearm was intended both for the face and to
inflict bodily harm. I have no idea what Rose's motivation was in taking
out Fosse but like I said, he crushed him worse than Joey did his man and
we called it hussle.

And it's interesting to read that you think spiking is a part of the game
while forearms to the haid aint. How 'bout spiking to the head?

TTom
63.2192CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westTue Jun 04 1996 14:1512
    
    I watch about 30 games a year and catch highlights of the games almost
    every night (what would I do without ESPN 8^)  Albert Belle did not
    deserve 5 games for the incident.  He did deserve a leave without pay
    though.
    
    The question becomes "did he get 5 games because of his past?"  The
    answer IMO is definately yes and rightfully so.  If 1 and 2 game
    suspensions don't "fix" the behavior, then make it longer.
    
    Marc
    
63.2193Charlie Hussle....that's the differenceCNTROL::SALMONTue Jun 04 1996 14:2513
    There is a difference between Pete Rose and Albert Belle. When Rose hit
    somebody, it was "always" a clean hit. I believe Rose ran into Ray
    Fosse on that play at the plate during the All star game. The guy was
    never the same after that, but Rose came into him head first. He didn't
    throw any forarms.
    
    I never liked the guy myself. I always thought of him as somewhat of
    a phony (RUNNING to 1st base every time he walked), but I think the game
    could use guys like him today. Sad to see guys like this commanding
    multi millions of dollars. It was a legal take out, but it was cheap!
    I also believe that Belle was given a 5 game suspension due to the fact
    that he (allegedly) told his pitcher to throw at an opposing player.
    In the good old days he wouldn't have had to!!!!!!  
63.2194No question that the rules are open to brutal basepath playEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 04 1996 14:3020
    
    I'm trying to find a rule in the book that prohibits, say, a runner
    (or any player) from hauling back and punching a fielder in the face, 
    but I can't find it.  There's some general language around a "flagrant
    offense" in Section 9, The Umpire (I think Belle's play qualifies, 
    that was a football play, almost never seen in baseball to such a 
    gross extent) but nothing in the way of specifics (such as, is the 
    umpire allowed to award the DP, etc.).  It's possible that the umpire 
    could award the DP based on an interpretation of the general 
    interference rules, but these rules are more concerned with allowing 
    the fielder room to catch the ball and make a play, and say nothing 
    specific about the fielder's recourse against an armed assault.  
    Perhaps the "baseball is boring" crowd has an opening to spice up 
    the game, without changing the rules.
    
    Any additional help?
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2195POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 04 1996 15:146
>And it's interesting to read that you think spiking is a part of the game
>while forearms to the haid aint. How 'bout spiking to the head?

Vina had no chance to avoid that blow to the head.  Spikes-up sliding
is far less threatening to the health of the fielder and usually can
be avoided.
63.2196Are you shaking your bleeping head at me?EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 04 1996 15:1710
    
>    Glenn <pause>, is it true <pause>, you can not <pause> throw the long
>    ball any more?
    
    BTW, WTF were you talking about here?  I'm struggling to remember the
    last time I was required to throw the bomb...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2197OK if avoidable?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 04 1996 15:1911
Wail, based on what I saw, Vina coulda avoided the forearm and the whole
incident.

Firsted of all he knows Joey is a complete jerk who wouldn't think twice
about taking someone out. He was involved in a similar play previously in
the game and thirdly, after Joey was hit, he shoulda knowed something was
going to happen.

Maybe he shoulda jumped up and spiked ol' Al...

TTom
63.2198I go with the suspension off one quick lookMKOTS3::BREENTue Jun 04 1996 15:237
    Another opinion.  Belle's shot was not part of the game and the
    suspension was correct.  There is a section appended to the rulebook
    (casebook) which provides furthur information but I don't have it.
    
    Essentially the problem was the way Belle did it and it is an opinion
    case and I hope Budig sought the opinion of former players with
    objective judgement - say Bill Lee, Gorman Thomas :)
63.2199AWECIM::RUSSOclaimin!Tue Jun 04 1996 15:327
    
    Actually, Glenn makes the long throw quite well, from deep SS on a
    full-sized baseball field.  You can find out for yourself, Paul, join
    the Cubs!  As treasurer of the team, I know that the price of admission
    is going down with every minute.....
    
    Dave
63.2200"Led to later disruption"-- what the hell is that?EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 04 1996 15:369
    I will say this though-- that Gene Budig's comment that Belle's
    suspension is in at least part due to the "later disruption of the
    game" is farcical and clearly in error.  Belle should not be held
    responsible for later carnage escalated by other hotheads in
    the time-honored tradition of baseball...
    
    glenn
    
63.2201exSALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Tue Jun 04 1996 16:1416
>>    Albert Belle - the Dick Allen of the 90s?
    
    Joe, I was thinking that just the other day.  Richie "call me Dick"
    Allen was another player long on talent and short on etiquette.
    
    I'm probably the only person in the notesfile that didn't see the play
    where Belle ran into the infielder.  There is a difference between
    being competitive and poor sportsmanship.
    
    I agree with the comment that Belle is in for a long season on the
    road.  If he wants to carry the burden of being a martyr to justify the
    'world against Belle' attitude he maintains, he will continue on the
    path he's currently on.  Too bad for baseball...and too bad for Belle.
    Cleveland could very quickly become the team America loves to hate.
    
    		Ted
63.2202ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 04 1996 17:4216
    
>Vina had no chance to avoid that blow to the head.  Spikes-up sliding
>is far less threatening to the health of the fielder and usually can
>be avoided.
    
    Sure he did.  The _standard_ play in that situation is a slap tag,
    not standing dead still in the basepath.  If Belle _still_ goes
    after him, then there's no argument - Belle's out of line, gets
    tossed, and suspended, and clearly deserves it.
    
    But any number of people have watched the replay, and there's no
    clear consensus as to whether Belle raised his arms to be at the
    level of Vina's glove, or whether he raised his arms to maximize
    the impact of his blow.
    
    Joe
63.2203POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 04 1996 17:489
Belle, Tavarez and Matheny all have appealed their suspensions.  Usually
these appeals are heard the next time the player's team visits NY.
This could work out well for the Yanks, as Cleveland comes to Yankee
Stadium next week for 4 games and, given these appeals never succeed,
Bad-Albert and Tavarez might appeal themselves out of the Yanks series.

What a shame.  I want to see what happens when Bad-Albert takes his
position in LF.  I don't think these bleacher-bums will be deterred by
a baseball. :^)
63.2204ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 04 1996 20:0410
    
    re: .2188 
    
    Bruce was Bob Lobel the biggest freaking alcoholic on TV sober or
    tanked when he said Belle deserved a big suspension.  If you want to
    dump on Belle, dump on Lobel!  The guy is supposed to be a role model
    as a newscaster, but he's a freaking disgrace.  I went to one Red Sox
    game and he had some kids thrown out of the near front row seats in
    front of him when they moved down late in the game.  Loser!
    
63.2205ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 04 1996 20:069
    
    re: .2195
    
    >Vina had no chance to avoid that blow to the head.  Spikes-up sliding
    >is far less threatening to the health of the fielder and usually can
    >be avoided.
    
    False.  Vina could have gotten out of the way resulting in no out.
    
63.2206SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jun 04 1996 20:2510
    
    	All I keep remember is when Marty Barret of the Red Sox was put
    into the same exact predicament as Vina. Barret use to always make
    sure he could slap tag the runner and get out of the way, if not
    he threw the ball to second base.
    	Its also Vina's responsibility to either charge the ball or play
    back a little bit, so that he is not fielding the grounder while
    in the basepath.
    
    Ron
63.2207EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 04 1996 20:5620
    The "Vina could have gotten out of the way" argument is a ruse.
    Debate the play on its own merits.  Just because a quick defender 
    might be able to get out of the way of a Muhammed Ali jab, does 
    not make the jab legal (in baseball).  Just because Vina could
    have been smarter up against an opponent like Ali, does not make 
    the play legal (in baseball).
    
    There's no comparison with a player getting spiked.  As long as
    the runner is in the basepath, there has never been any question
    about the legality of going shoe-to-shoe, shoe-to-leg with a 
    fielder.  It's universally accepted as part of the game.  The 
    elbow-to-head, forearm-to-head, is at the very least subject to
    the umpire's judgment (umpire's judgment is where Budig has 
    something of a credibility problem-- but the umpire doesn't always 
    get it right, either, and the league does have the power of review
    in meting out suspensions).
    
    glenn
    
63.2208ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 04 1996 20:574
    
    Debate the play on its own merits?  Okay, it was a legal play, no
    suspension.  To suspend Belle for what happened later in the game is
    ridiculous.
63.2209EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 04 1996 21:0014
    
> Okay, it was a legal play, no suspension.
    
    Not in the opinion of Emperor Gene Budig, at least (or in mine, FWIW).
    
> To suspend Belle for what happened later in the game is ridiculous.
                                          
    Agreed.  Belle'd be smart to appeal entirely on these grounds, for
    whatever part of the suspension the later results were responsible
    for.
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2210ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jun 05 1996 00:117
    
    This discussion is ridiculous.  Vina clearly could have gotten out of
    the way - he chose not to.  He clearly had the glove around his face
    and Belle's.  If I'm going to collide into someone with a glove up near
    my face or throat, i'm not going to let him just slap me in the head. 
    I'm bringing my arms up to knock out the ball and protect myself.  The
    play was legal, period.
63.2211POWDML::GARBARINOWed Jun 05 1996 13:593
>    This discussion is ridiculous.

Yeah, let's save time, energy and disk space for Belle's next *crime*.
63.2212Vina vicious in his glovework in area of face/throat...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Jun 05 1996 14:1213
>    This discussion is ridiculous.  Vina clearly could have gotten out of
>    the way - he chose not to.  He clearly had the glove around his face
>    and Belle's.  If I'm going to collide into someone with a glove up near
>    my face or throat, i'm not going to let him just slap me in the head. 
>    I'm bringing my arms up to knock out the ball and protect myself. 
    
    Hahahahahaha... Albert was acting in "self-defense".  "Are you 
    threatening me?" with that 2B's mitt, he said to little Vina...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2213CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westWed Jun 05 1996 14:1314
    
    I realize that one side is not going to convince the other side, but
    what the hell...
    
    The glove WAS NOT near anyones face, it was chest high.  Watch the
    replay on your "Cleveland Indian Excuse VCR" and you'll see that
    Belle's arms were a full foot above the glove.  If Belle was truely
    trying to hit the ball out of the glove, how come he couldn't get
    within a foot of the glove but can hit a 3 inch baseball right in the
    middle with a large stick?  Maybe he should just carry the bat around
    the basepads.
    
    Marc
    
63.2214MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 05 1996 15:0015
    Ron, are you sure about the position of the second baseman vis a vis
    collisions.  I believe there are a number of casebook interpretations
    and they are essentially taught in the minor leagues as conventions of
    baseball or "how it's done".
    
    It is my belief that the second baseman, if fielding a batted ball,
    when he establishes a position, even if on the line, can not be
    interfered with by the runner.  In this case Belle arrived right about
    the time Vina fielded the ball and would probably have been okay if he
    just kept running into Vina.  What was not okay was the obvious forearm
    shiver and the ump who okayed the play was wrong.  He should have
    called it a double play for illegal interference.
    
    But that one play shouldn't merit more than a small fine except
    possibly for any injury - and Vina was out there the next day.
63.2216ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 05 1996 17:1424
    
>    I realize that one side is not going to convince the other side, but
>    what the hell...
>    
>    The glove WAS NOT near anyones face, it was chest high.  Watch the
>    replay on your "Cleveland Indian Excuse VCR" and you'll see that
>    Belle's arms were a full foot above the glove.
    
    I don't have the incident taped, making it rather difficult to view
    again, but that was _not_ what I saw; OTOH, my memory's rather
    faulty.
    
    And, personally, I'm not trying to make excuses for Belle.  He's
    done a lot of stupid things in the past; I've never denied that.
    And while I may be a fan of the Tribe, I don't think that blinds me
    to their faults.  But -based upon what I have seen and heard of this
    incident- I do not believe Belle was in any way deserving of a
    suspension.
    
    As an aside - looking up the hitting and pitching stats for the
    Yankees yesterday, I noticed something rather scary - Chicago's
    got the best offense _and_ pitching in the league right now.
    
    Joe
63.2217From the ashes...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Jun 05 1996 17:3415
>    As an aside - looking up the hitting and pitching stats for the
>    Yankees yesterday, I noticed something rather scary - Chicago's
>    got the best offense _and_ pitching in the league right now.
    
    And you said it couldn't be done.  But, the point was made, on 
    the offensive side, for any team that has Frank Thomas on its 
    roster, build a lineup, and runs will come.
    
    But let's face it, baseball is just too unpredictable for even
    the stat analysts to prognosticate, at least not with near the 
    reliability they like to assert.
    
    glenn
    
63.2218Umps Lost Control !POWDML::DFARRELLDennis Farrell -- MSO2-3/G2Wed Jun 05 1996 18:1062
    Well, after seeing the replay of the incident about 3 times and after
    reading ALL the replies in this note, here is my opinion on the whole
    mess:
    
    1. Vina made a dumb play (twice).  Both times he should have either
       slapped a tag on Belle or thrown the ball to second to get [at
       least] the force out and a possible DP (with Murray running your
       chances are pretty good).
    
    2. This is the biggie in my mind --- the umpires (especially Brinkman
       the home plate umpire) totally lost control of the game and let the
       incidents escalate on their own.  I say this because:
    
       - After the Milwaukee pitcher threw 2 pitches over/behind Belle 
         then plunked him with another one, Brinkman should have given
         the Milwaukee pitcher, catcher and the Manager the heave-ho.
         There is no excuse for not taking action on what was clearly
         (in my mind) an intentional HBP.  If the ump took control and
         ejected the right individuals, MAYBE Joey/Albert would not have
         tried to remove Vina's body from his head.  (That's a big MAYBE,
         given the history of the walking time bomb himself !!)
    
       - If Albert/Joey still did what he did to Vina, he also should have
         been run from the game -- right away with no hesitation (rules or
         no rules).  The biggest reason Belle did what he did was to "get
         even" for being hit with a pitch.  Sure, he plays the game hard
         and some say he's "too focused" on baseball but what he did was
         malicious and uncalled for (even though Vina made the above
         mentioned dumb play).
    
    - Tavares showed no remorse after wrestling Brinkman to the ground.
      Sure, the ump came up from behind him but if you watch the tape,
      Tavares was in Brinkman's face arguing even after he knew it was
      an umpire he had thrown to the ground.  Suspension justified in this
      case --- should have been more than 5 games.
    
    Summary:
    
    - The umps blew it.  If they took control when they should have, this
      incident may have never happened.
    
    - Belle is an idiot.  An excellent player yes, but a moron who is BAD
      for the game.  Unfortunately (as someone said earlier) I'm afraid
      this isn't the last incident Belle will be involved in which will
      place another black mark on him and on the game.  
    
    - Cleveland management has to be worried about the state
      of affairs on their team.  It's too bad this talented team has
      managed to find ways to make it the most hated team (by fans) in
      baseball.  
    
    - John Hart has done an outstanding job building a winner
      and I'm sure he doesn't want to see it all go up in smoke.  Hart
      and Hargrove have a responsibility to "put a lid" on their team's
      behavior and talk to them about class, dignity and professionalism.
      A lot of bad actors (Murray, Lofton, Ramirez et al) on that club.
      Maybe it would be best if they just let Albert and some of his
      cronies take a walk at the end of the year.  There is still enough
      talent there to win a lot of ballgames.
    
    DF
      
63.2219raiders of baseball?THEMAX::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Wed Jun 05 1996 19:153
      All the tribe needs is Marge....
    
      Tim
63.2220a team that doesn't know how to act like a winnerPOWDML::GARBARINOWed Jun 05 1996 19:2213
>    - John Hart has done an outstanding job building a winner
>      and I'm sure he doesn't want to see it all go up in smoke.

>      Maybe it would be best if they just let Albert and some of his
>      cronies take a walk at the end of the year.  There is still enough
>      talent there to win a lot of ballgames.


My point all along.  For an organization with such a long history of
failure and little-to-no fan support, having this emergence to the AL's
top position tainted by some bad asses must be pissin' the front office
off.  This is NOT the type of work John Hart wants to be dealing with,
I'm sure.
63.2221Sound familiarSTRATA::BTOWERWed Jun 05 1996 19:341
    Cleveland = Loserville USA.
63.2222ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jun 05 1996 19:534
    
>      All the tribe needs is Marge....
    
    Thank you, no.
63.2223Buckeye HOF: Groaner, Marge, Sam Shepard, Woody Hayes...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Jun 05 1996 20:0910
>>      All the tribe needs is Marge....
>    
>    Thank you, no.
    
    Marge is another one of those "friendly" Midwesterners...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2224MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 05 1996 21:147
    How about Art Schlichter for Sam Shepard - jury reversed verdict in
    second trial right?
    
    The famous fixed game involving Cobb,Speaker, Wood and the famous
    Leonard letter involved Cleveland.
    
    All in all not all that much one way or the other.
63.2225... and the Sox ain't winnning anything anytime soon!ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 00:329
    
    .2218
    
    Complete and utter non-sense.  How do you figure Manny Ramirez, Eddie
    Murray and Kenny Lofton to be bad actors.  I guess their bad actors
    because they're good and they're on a good team - and they know it.  If
    that's the case, Clemens is a bad actor... except, Clemens also has the
    fact that he's a baby going for him as well - since he always blames
    the umps.
63.2226Belle's just another bullyFABSIX::R_LUCHTNo sleep till.......Thu Jun 06 1996 04:225
	All Belle does is pick on guys too small to protect themselves. He
doesn't have the b*lls to do something like that against the Red Sox because
Jose Canseco is twice his size and would bench press Belle if he tried it. Also
Cleveland fans, check the stats, Mo's numbers are better.
	Belle deserved the five games, end of story.
63.2227Belle's 95 numbers were 5X betterROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 10:115
    
    Also Boston fans, the seasons not over.  I guess when your team is
    helplessly and forever a loser, its good to compare individual stats.
    
    p.s. Belle has more HRs.
63.2228ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 10:204
    
    Indians re-sign Swindell.  While he's not the pitcher he used to be,
    maybe all he needed was a change of scenery.  Its a no lose situation
    for the tribe.
63.2229He's still just a bullyFABSIX::R_LUCHTNo sleep till.......Thu Jun 06 1996 10:328



		Let him try to run over Jose.


				
63.2230ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 06 1996 12:3920
    
>    Also Cleveland fans, check the stats, Mo's numbers are better.
    
    OK, here you go:
    
    Mo Vaughn: .703 SLG, .459 OBP
    
    Albert Belle: .722 SLG, .424 OBP
    
    Belle has 3 SB (0 CS), Vaughn 0/0.
    
    Vaughn's numbers, this year _are_ clearly better, since a point of
    OBP is worth more than a point of SLG.
    
    McGwire's numbers are better than Vaughn's, but in fewer at bats.
    
    Hmmm... if the season ended today, Vaughn would be a deserving MVP,
    unlike last year.
    
    Joe
63.2231CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 12:5012
RE       <<< Note 63.2230 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>    Hmmm... if the season ended today, Vaughn would be a deserving MVP,
>    unlike last year.
    
  ... that is if MVP were based on offensive stats.

  But since MVP is based on who the sports press thinks is the greatest star
and greatest all around guy, Bell doesn't stand a lobster's chance at a New
England clam bake. 

  George
63.2232ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 13:463
    
    Well, since George Bell retired about 5 years ago, its irrelevant. 
    Lets try to stick with the Vaughn - Belle discussion please.
63.2233and the winner is?SUBPAC::SKALSKIThu Jun 06 1996 13:4712
    
    
    		Time to change the subject.  I see Chicago is only 1 game 
    	back of the tribe.  Have they played each other this'd year yet.
    	What the head to head record.  Is Chicago playing over thier heads?
    	Looks like a good race shaping up.
    
    
    						Shark
    
    
    
63.2234ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 13:492
    
    Chicago is probably the second best team in the AL this year.
63.2235ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 13:5111
    
    Is it true that other than the AAA Tigers, the Sox have the worst
    record in the AL.  Pretty pathetic for a team that made it to the
    playoff last year (granted the Indians slapped the crap out of them
    as usual - Sox have never beated the Indians in the playoffs).
    
    My guess is that all the talk we'll hear from this point on is how
    Mo's numbers are better than Albert's... and when Albert passes him up
    like we know he will, they'll be some other lame story - like Clemens
    is better than the Indians #5 starter or something like that.
    
63.2236Why Can't They See How Lucky They Are ??POWDML::DFARRELLDennis Farrell -- MSO2-3/G2Thu Jun 06 1996 13:5135
    re .2225
    
    Paul,
    
    I didn't say they (Murray, Lofton, Ramirez) weren't good players but
    you hit the nail on the head by saying "they're good and they're on a
    good team - AND THEY KNOW IT."
    
    I'm not naive enough to believe everything I read in the print media
    or believe everything I hear in the electronic media but over the past
    2-3 months I have been hearing a consistent message from Peter Gammons
    and other "credible" media types and the message is this --- the
    personalities and attitudes on the Indians have managed to turn them
    into one of the most hated teams in baseball (by non-Cleveland fans and
    most all of the media).  Last year, they were somewhat of a Cinderella 
    story because they rose to the top after so many years of being on the 
    bottom. 
    
    Now, perhaps we can argue that success and media scrutiny/pressure has
    created this monster.  That doesn't excuse the fact that Eddie ("the
    whole world is against me") Murray and whiners like Lofton and Ramirez 
    behave the way they do to the press.
    
    My comment about Hart and Hargrove taking some responsibility and
    talking to these guys about being professional and humble is
    appropriate.  I'm getting real tired of hearing people like Joe Morgan
    (not the Walpole Joe) and other morons defending the behavior of Belle
    and the boys.
    
    Is there any humility and class left in professional sports ?  Sadly,
    I'm beginning to think the answer is "No" !
    
    DF 
    
                                        
63.2237ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 13:533
    
    The fact is, plain and simple, the best team is always hated.  Do you
    think teams liked the Yankees when they were winning?  
63.2238ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 13:567
    
    Okay Dennis, you don't believe everything you read.  I'll take that as
    a given.  Now tell me about all of the incidents that support this
    claim -
    
    "That doesn't excuse... [why or how] whiners like Lofton and Ramirez 
    behave the way they do to the press"
63.2239ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 06 1996 13:5638
    
>>    Hmmm... if the season ended today, Vaughn would be a deserving MVP,
>>    unlike last year.
    
>  ... that is if MVP were based on offensive stats.
    
    Ummm - why do you say this?  My choices for "deserving MVPs" are
    based upon offensive and defensive stats, plus such things as
    leadership and team perfromance where there's a close case.
    
    Vaughn's a deserving MVP so far this year, period.  He was _not_
    a deserving MVP last year, period (IMHO, of course).
    
>  But since MVP is based on who the sports press thinks is the greatest star
>and greatest all around guy, Bell doesn't stand a lobster's chance at a New
>England clam bake. 
    
    Well, Jay Bell doesn't really stand a chance anyway.
    
    BTW, though, the MVP is officially based on:
    
    1. Actual value of a player to his team, that is, strength of
    offense and defense.
    2. Number of games played.
    3. General character, disposition, loyalty and effort.
    4. Former winners are eligible.
    5. Members of the committee may vote for more than one
    member of a team.
    
    You are also urged to give serious consideration to all your
    selections, from 1 to 10. A 10th-place vote can influence the
    outcome of an election. You must fill in all 10 places on
    your ballot.
    
    Keep in mind that all players are eligible for the MVP, and
    that includes pitchers and designated hitters.
    
    Joe
63.2240Tribe behaved as if they were too big for the World SeriesEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 06 1996 14:0610
>    The fact is, plain and simple, the best team is always hated.  Do you
>    think teams liked the Yankees when they were winning?  
    
    No, while the Indians were putting their arrogance on national public 
    display in last year's World Series, many were more than happy to see 
    the Braves assert themselves as the less-hated, best team...
    
    glenn
    
63.2241it's the fansHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 14:1112
I don't hate teams, just some of the fans.

The Braves were nothing for a long time. You could go to the game and be
sure of getting any kinda seat you cared to purchase. Then they started
winning and all of a sudden, ever body's a freakin Braves fan.

So naturally, I was rootin for the Indians. 

And I kinda like Albert Belle, too. Sure he's a_asshole but I like the
way he gets ever body all fired up.

TTom
63.2242CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 14:3012
        <<< Note 63.2241 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>

>The Braves were nothing for a long time. You could go to the game and be
>sure of getting any kinda seat you cared to purchase. Then they started
>winning and all of a sudden, ever body's a freakin Braves fan.

  That's for sure. Back in '91 we went to DECUS in Atlanta and we could hear
them singing the National Anthem when we bought our tickets but we got lower
deck just past 1st base anyway. The next year when they went and tried to get
tickets 2 days before the game they were already sold out. 

  George
63.2243WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Jun 06 1996 14:314
    
    
       Groaner, don't sell Cleveland short. They are still the second best
    team in the AL this year.
63.2244SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townThu Jun 06 1996 16:328
                     <<< Note 63.2228 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

    
   > Indians re-sign Swindell.  While he's not the pitcher he used to be,
   > maybe all he needed was a change of scenery.  Its a no lose situation
   > for the tribe.

    Chuckle....
63.2245ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 17:013
    
    The Braves weren't arrogant?  How about Javy Lopez's deep flyout that
    he was convinced was a HR, so he starts into his HR trot/celebration.
63.2246ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 17:034
    
    Leave it to George to bust right into the discussion on how all the
    Braves fans came out of the woodwork when they started to win.  What
    was that saying?  "That's like calling the kettle black"!
63.2247CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 17:138
  Paul, who lives in Lowell where the Indians never played,

  When I was at that game in late spring of 1991 someone asked me if I was
a Braves fan because I was from Atlanta. I told them no, I'm a Braves fan
because they are from Boston. Who ever it was said something like "Oh yeh,
I heard they were from there".

  George, who lives in Boston where the Braves once Played
63.2248EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 06 1996 17:149
    
>    The Braves weren't arrogant?  How about Javy Lopez's deep flyout that
>    he was convinced was a HR, so he starts into his HR trot/celebration.
    
    ...and then there was all that gratuitous celebratin' on the field 
    of play when the mighty Indians were sent packin'...
    
    glenn
    
63.2249ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 17:1910
    Yeah, real arrogance that Lopez has, the whole country turned on the
    Braves and now they are the second most hated team in Baseball.
    
    Must have been all the media in attendance that distracted him from
    seeing that the ball was caught.
    
    There is no comaprison between the two organizations in regards to
    "Class", so don't even try.
    
    UMDan
63.2250CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 17:2510
  The thing I remember about Lopez was that play where he signaled Pena to
pump up that high fastball so he could pick one of the Indians off 1st base.
For a 2nd year guy he did an outstanding job behind the plate in that series.

  But there is little doubt the "I can't stand any athlete that doesn't wear
sack cloth" crowd will find some excuse to be miserable about any athlete's
good fortune but so what? The real fans could care less. The Braves and Indians
are both great teams and they deserve to be where they are today. 

  George 
63.2251faint praiseHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 17:314
The Indians "deserve" to be in Cleveland? Main, what a slur.

TTom
63.2252CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 17:364
  What I had in mind was being A.L. Champs, not being in Cleveland.

  George
63.2253EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 06 1996 17:408
                             
>  What I had in mind was being A.L. Champs, not being in Cleveland.
    
    Yeah, that was a sentence too cruel even for the Browns...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2254CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 17:517
Re      <<< Note 63.2253 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN "Hardball, good ol' country" >>>

>    Yeah, that was a sentence too cruel even for the Browns...
    
  Never more,

  George
63.2255ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 19:057
    
    Better yet, you could be from Boston and have no hope of winning any
    championship for the next 75 years - and have your car stolen.  I
    mean this is the home of auto theft, and poor drivers capital of the
    USA...  not to mention the bad chowder... the only thing Boston has
    going for it is Cambridge, but since they stole the name from the UK,
    that doesn't really count as part of Boston.
63.2256CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 19:104
  Cambridge was never part of Boston.

  George
63.2257sox sip, mo does not hustle, clemens is doneROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 19:103
    
    p.s. only in Boston are the Indians a hated team because the Sox fans
    are jealous.  Indians merchandise sales is in the top 3 nationwide.
63.2258EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 06 1996 19:1211
>    Better yet, you could be from Boston and have no hope of winning any
>    championship for the next 75 years - and have your car stolen.  I
>    mean this is the home of auto theft, and poor drivers capital of the
>    USA...
    
    Or there's Cleveland, Halloween vandalism capital of the free world...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2259Wahoo...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 06 1996 19:1410
>    p.s. only in Boston are the Indians a hated team because the Sox fans
>    are jealous.  Indians merchandise sales is in the top 3 nationwide.
    
    Usually an indication of widespread appeal to juvenile deliquent 
    punk/gang contingents and/or a racist logo...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2260ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 19:152
    
    Euclid was never part of Cleveland.
63.2261wrong geometryHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 19:170
63.2262ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 19:173
    
    Cleveland never lived in Euclid.
    Euclid never lived in Cleveland.
63.2263ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 19:203
    
    O.J. never liked Clark.
    Clark never like o.j.
63.2264CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 19:226
  He's gone into a spin.

  This can't be good.

  George
63.2265probably also has other prejudices as wellROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 19:225
    
    re: .2259
    
    What we have here is an angry, judgemental person.  Next time look in
    the mirror before you point fingers.
63.2266very erieHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 19:230
63.2267ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 19:253
    
    Rumor has it that the terminal tower was named after Bruce Tower.  Is
    this true?
63.2268Open Circuit?STRATA::BTOWERThu Jun 06 1996 19:303
    Grono, Someone put somethin in your afternoon java? Mind clueing us in
    on what the ____ your blabbering about in the last few notes. Or take
    a powder or something, your latch has unlatched 8>).
63.2269MKOTS3::BREENThu Jun 06 1996 19:493
    "There is no royal road to Cleveland"
    
    Euclid  333 bc
63.2270sine of the timesHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 20:071
That Euclid guy was always looking for some angle...
63.2271CHEFS::7A1_GRNGo GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic teamFri Jun 07 1996 09:429
    .2255
    
    >but since they stole the name from the UK, that doesn't really count
    as part of Boston.
    
    So was Cleveland stolen, so that doesn't really count as part of the U.S.
    
    
    CHARLEY:^}
63.2272SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townFri Jun 07 1996 11:038
Cambridge is the only thing that Boston has going for it?

Now THAT is pathetic.

Put up a big fence around the PRC and let em rent control 
themselves etc to their hearts desire...

daryll
63.2273MKOTS3::BREENFri Jun 07 1996 13:155
    Didn't Cambridge vote out the rent control a few years back? 
    Brokers,Lawyer,Doctors etc were renting a lot of the units.
    
    If Cleveland is land of the Cleves just what's a cleve?  Is it like a
    Boer?
63.2274CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 07 1996 14:3911
RE                      <<< Note 63.2273 by MKOTS3::BREEN >>>

>    Didn't Cambridge vote out the rent control a few years back? 
>    Brokers,Lawyer,Doctors etc were renting a lot of the units.

  No, what happened was that we had a referendum on the Massachusetts State
ballot for a law that would prevent towns like Cambridge from being allowed
to decide for themselves if they wanted rent control. I believe it passed
but it's not clear if it's been implemented yet.
    
  George
63.2275ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 07 1996 14:512
    
    If Boston is really a ton of bos, what is "bos" anyways?
63.2276CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 07 1996 14:544
  da bos is da guy dat tell yah what tah do.

  George
63.2277Bruce is da BossHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 07 1996 14:541
63.2278follow the rules, huh!ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 07 1996 15:393
    
    "Boss" is not "Bos"... an extra letter was added... just like "Cleve"
    is not "Clever" or "Cleave"!
63.2279CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 07 1996 15:5310
  Boston was named after a town in England which got it's name centuries ago.

  Most likely you would have to look at Middle or Old English for the meanings
of "Bos" and "ton". I'd guess "Town" for "ton".

  Old English was prior to the Norman Invasion by William the Conqueror and
the Battle of Hastings in 1066 AD and Middle English would have been the
next few centuries after that.

  George
63.2280OK thenHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 07 1996 15:534
Blame in on the bossanova which has nothing to do with that school in
Philly, neither...

and how much is Brian Bos worth?
63.2281bicentennial?CHEFS::7A1_GRNGo GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic teamFri Jun 07 1996 16:227
    Cleveland was named after Moses Cleaveland who worked for the
    Connecticut Land Company. The town plans were completed in 1796.
    
    If you knew that already, tell me to shut up.
    
    
    CHARLEY
63.2282mistakeHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 07 1996 16:263
>                               -< bicentennial? >-

No, I think Cleveland passed one of them anti-gay ordinances...
63.2283CHEFS::7A1_GRNGo GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic teamFri Jun 07 1996 16:274
    Ha Ha!
    
    
    CHARLEY
63.2284and on this bandwagon, ...HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 07 1996 16:285
>    <<< Note 63.2283 by CHEFS::7A1_GRN "Go GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic team" >>>

BTW, Charley, great p-name. I just noticed it.

TTom
63.2285SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Fri Jun 07 1996 16:501
    Cleveland would/should never be confused with Cleverland.
63.2286what I heard, I thinkHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 07 1996 16:542
Wasn't it Eldridge Cleverland who said that if'n you're not part of the
solution you're part of the problem?
63.2287CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 07 1996 16:585
  No, I think it was Beaver Cleaver who said if you are not part of the
problem then you'd have no use for the solution.

  Or something like that,
  George
63.2288Leisure Suit Larry?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 07 1996 17:06279
maybe Leisure Suit Larry Cleveland

long after the <FF>

    Leisure Suit Larry VI
   
Shape Up or Slip Out

   
     _________________________________________________________________
   
     * What's the basic idea behind this game? How do I play? Help all
       the babes in the game. Find a babe. Talk to her. Find out what she
       needs, get it for her, and get ready for some gratitude. Not!
       Don't get frustrated. Helping one babe may allow you to eventually
       find the right babe for you.
     * How do I get started? If you're in the front lobby at the
       beginning of the game, try talking to the front desk clerk to get
       your room key. Go up the stairs to your room, unlock your door and
       go inside. Look at the table. Try calling all the phone numbers on
       the cards on the table. Go to the bathroom. Use the sink. Look at
       the brown water. Call maintenance to send a plumber up to fix it.
     * How do I use the elevator or the ice machine next to my room? Some
       things are not useful at the beginning of the game such as the
       elevator and ice machine. We're going to try hard to make you
       forget about certain things that you see early on, so keep your
       eyes peeled and remember to look at things later that you couldn't
       use at the start!
     * What does Gammie want? Gammie wants to use the Cellulite Machine.
       You'll have to fix it.
     * How do I repair the Cellulite machine's piston? Go to the dining
       room. Walk into the kitchen. Put your hand in the garbage to find
       a can of lard. Take the lard and use it to lubricate the large
       piston on the left.
     * How do I repair the Cellulite machine's ripped vacuum hose? Go to
       the Mud Bath and walk one screen to the right to reach the Weight
       Room. There is a wide rubber belt on the BunShaker machine. If the
       BunShaker machine is being used, talk to the body-builder,
       Thunderbird. Leave the room and return. The BunShaker should be
       vacant and you can take the belt. Use the belt on the hole in the
       vacuum hose of the Cellulite Machine.
     * How do I clean the Cellulite machine's filter? Use a wrench on the
       filter tank bolt. Open the filter lid. Take the clogged filter and
       use it on the sink in the Kitchen to clean it. Put the filter back
       in the filter tank. Close the lid and tighten the bolt with the
       wrench.
     * Where can I find a wrench? You can get a wrench from the plumber.
       Go to your bathroom and run the water in the sink. If you see
       brown water, call maintenance at extension 76 to report your
       plumbing problems. If the water is clear, stuff a roll of toilet
       paper down the toilet. You can get some toilet paper from the
       front of the maid's cart that appears every now and then outside
       your room. When the plumber arrives, click the pick-up icon next
       to the plumber to get the wrench. Use the pick-up icon, not the
       hand icon. Take his file too, you might need it.
     * I think the machine works, but I can't seem to tell Gammie. Why?
       Give the machine a test run. Turn it on. Wait for the message that
       everything is okay. Once you see the message, shut the machine
       down and go talk to Gammie.
     * Where can I get an orange? Go to the Dining Room. Click your hand
       on the salad bar to find an orange. Take the orange.
     * I need something to cool Gammie's forehead. What can I do? Get a
       washcloth from the front of the maid's cart that appears every now
       and then outside your room. Click the washcloth on the pool. Go to
       the Kitchen. Open the refrigerator door. Put the wet cloth inside
       and close the fridge door. Leave the Kitchen. Return to the
       Kitchen and open the fridge. Use the take icon to pick up the cool
       cloth.
     * Where can I get some mineral water? If Gammie asks for some
       mineral water, go to the hallway door east of the Blues Bar to
       find a room service tray. Take the mineral water off the tray.
     * After I helped Gammie, she took off! Why did I go through all
       this? Gammie left behind a lot of excess cellulite. This can be
       useful. Go to the beach and click your hand on the sand to find a
       whale oil lamp. Click the lamp on the drainage faucet in the
       center of the Cellulite Drainage room. Get a match in the Blues
       Bar and click your zipper on it to light it. Light the lamp, and
       you'll find you've created a Lamp of Knowledge. Pretty neat, huh?
     * Where is Rose? Walk one screen left of the Front Desk. Open the
       hallway door to enter the Health Spa. Rose is in the High Colonic
       Treatment room through the door on the left.
     * What does Rose want? Look around the High Colonic Treatment room.
       You'll see lots of flowers. Rose loves flowers. You need to get
       some more flowers for Rose. The only flowers you can take are in
       your room. If you don't have your room key, talk to the Front Desk
       girl to get it. Get the flowers from the vase in your room and
       give them to Rose. She'll give you an orchid for all your
       troubles.
     * Where is Burgundy? Burgundy sometimes sings at the bar. If you go
       to the bar and Burgundy isn't on stage, try walking out of the bar
       for a little while and come back later.
     * How can I talk to Burgundy? You need to unplug her microphone so
       she'll stop singing and listen to you. Put your hand on the
       microphone wire to unplug it.
     * Where can I find some beer? The Spa will not serve alcohol, but
       you can find a place that has beer. Go to the Mud Baths and walk
       right. Walk through the Weight Room to enter the Aerobics Room.
       Use the empty spot to dance and end the class. Talk to the
       aerobics instructor and get her employee badge. Go back to the
       hall and walk east until you reach the gate to the employee's
       campground. Use the employee badge to open the gate. Enter the
       tent and take some beer for Burgundy.
     * The beer didn't help. Burgundy is singing again. What now? She
       wants more beer! Go back to the employee's campground and get more
       for her. After she drinks the second six-pack, she'll meet you in
       the sauna.
     * Where can I get a towel to wear in the sauna? You can get a towel
       in two different places. You can take a towel from the maid's cart
       that appears every now and then outside your room. You can also
       get one from Gary the Towel Attendant in the Health Spa. To get
       the towel from Gary, click your hand on the desk to sign in.
     * How do I put the towel on? Go to the men's locker room. Open the
       last locker on the lower right. Click the towel on yourself to
       wear it. To change back into your leisure suit, open the locker
       and click the towel on yourself again.
     * Burgundy and Cav left without me. What do I do? Burgundy left her
       silver bracelet in the sauna. Take it.
     * Where can I find Shablee? Shablee is in the Make-Up Classroom. The
       classroom is two screens left from the Front Desk. Go down the
       ramp. Shablee is the girl in the lower right of the screen.
     * What does Shablee want? Shablee wants an evening gown.
     * Where can I find an evening gown? Burgundy, the Country Western
       Blues singer has a gown. If you've gone to the sauna with her, you
       can find the dress back-stage at the bar. Click your hand on the
       curtain to walk on stage. Walk south of the stage between the
       curtains to find the dress. Take the dress and give it to Shablee.
     * Shablee says she'll meet me later on the beach, but later never
       happens! You need to get a condom. Get your room key from the
       girl at the front desk and go upstairs to your room. Look at the
       cards on the table. Call the Turn Down service at 75 to order a
       surprise. Leave your room and go downstairs. When you return to
       your room, a condom will be left on your bed. Take the condom, and
       you'll meet Shablee on the beach.
     * I've met Shablee on the beach. What do I do now? Put your hand on
       her and talk to her several times. When the moment is right, click
       the condom on her. When you've returned to your room, go back to
       the beach and get the champagne.
     * What does Charlotte want? Charlotte wants some batteries.
     * How do I get batteries? Go to the Blues Bar and get a match from
       the bowl at the left end of the bar. Go to the hallway. Talk to
       Art the Tram Driver to ride the tram east until it stops outside
       the employee's campground. Give the match to Art so he'll go smoke
       a cigar. After Art leaves, click your hand on the tram to open the
       rear hood. Use the wrench on the tram motor to disconnect some
       cables. After you close the hood, Art returns and will open the
       hood. Talk to Art to get his flashlight. Before Art asks you to
       return his flashlight, click your hand on the flashlight to remove
       the batteries.
     * Where can I get a wrench? You can get a wrench from the plumber.
       Go to your bathroom and run the water in the sink. If you see
       brown water, call maintenance at extension 76 to report your
       plumbing problems. If the water is clear, stuff a roll of toilet
       paper down the toilet. You can get some toilet paper from the
       front of the maid's cart that appears every now and then outside
       your room. When the plumber arrives, click the pick-up icon next
       to the plumber to get the wrench. Use the pick-up icon, not the
       hand icon. Take his file too, you might need it.
     * How do I open the Electro-Shock door? Go to the Make-Up Classroom
       and take the unused electrical cord on the floor. Go to the Mud
       Baths. Stand near the Electro-Shock door and click your hand on
       the electrical cord to strip one end bare. Use the cord on the
       electrical outlet to plug it in. Use the electrical cord on the
       electronic lock to open the Electro-Shock door. After Charlotte
       zaps you, return to the Electro-Shock room and get the pearl
       earring that someone dropped.
     * Where is Thunderbird? Thunderbird is working out in the Weight
       Room. Go to the Mud Baths. Walk one more screen to the right.
     * What does Thunderbird want? Thunderbird wants a pair of handcuffs.
     * Where can I find a pair of handcuffs? Go to the Front Lobby. Walk
       one screen south to get an outside view of the Spa. Look at the
       gatehouse to get a close-up of Darryl the Gate Guard. He has a
       spare set of handcuffs on his belt.
     * How can I get the handcuffs? You need to distract Darryl the Gate
       Guard. Go to the Mud Baths. Click your hand on the plants below
       the video camera to move them out of the way. Use a wrench on the
       video camera to aim it through the vent into the women's shower
       room. Go back to the gatehouse. Use the pick-up icon to take the
       handcuffs from Darryl's belt. Give the handcuffs to Thunderbird.
     * Where can I find a wrench? You can get a wrench from the plumber.
       Go to your bathroom and run the water in the sink. If you see
       brown water, call maintenance at extension 76 to report your
       plumbing problems. If the water is clear, stuff a roll of toilet
       paper down the toilet. You can get some toilet paper from the
       front of the maid's cart that appears every now and then outside
       your room. When the plumber arrives, click the pick-up icon next
       to the plumber to get the wrench. Use the pick-up icon, not the
       hand icon. Take his file too, you might need it.
     * Which room is Thunderbird's? Go to the Front Desk and walk three
       screens to the left. Open the middle door to find Thunderbird's
       room. Thunderbird will give you a dog collar. Click your hand icon
       on it to get a diamond.
     * Where can I find Cav? Cav is the Aerobics Instructor in the
       Aerobics Classroom. Go to the Mud Baths. Walk to the right to
       enter the Weight Room. Open the door on the right to enter the
       Aerobics Classroom. You can also reach Aerobics Classroom from a
       door on the right leading from the Pool area.
     * How can I get a chance to talk to Cav? Click your hand on the
       empty step to start dancing and disrupt the class. Cav the
       Aerobics Instructor will dismiss the class. You can now talk to
       her.
     * How can Cav help me? Talk to her a few times, look at the employee
       badge on her shirt. Take the badge. The badge will allow you to
       get into the employee's campground.
     * I need a date so I can meet Cav in the Sauna. Who do I ask? Ask
       Burgundy.
     * Where can I find a towel for the Sauna? You can get a towel in two
       different places. You can take a towel from the maid's cart that
       appears every now and then outside your room. You can also get one
       from Gary the Towel Attendant in the Health Spa. To get the towel
       from Gary, click your hand on the desk to sign in.
     * How do I put the towel on? Go to the men's locker room. Open the
       last locker on the lower right. Click the towel on yourself to
       wear it. To change back into your leisure suit, open the locker
       and click the towel on yourself again.
     * Where is Merrily? Merrily is floating next to the floating bar in
       the pool. You can't talk to her until you get close to her.
     * What does Merrily want? Merrily wants unlimited access to the
       bungee/dive tower.
     * Where can I find a swimsuit for the pool? Take some dental floss
       from the back of the maid's cart that appears every now and then
       outside your room. Go to the pool and wait for the pool bar to
       float near the edge of the pool. Look at the floating bar and take
       the sunglasses' case from the bar. Open the sunglasses' case and
       remove the sunglasses. Click your hand on it again to get the
       cloth. Use the dental floss on the cloth to make a swimsuit.
     * How do I put on my swimsuit? Go to the pool. Click the swimsuit on
       yourself to wear it. You can't wear the swimsuit anywhere else. To
       put your clothes back on, click the swimsuit on yourself again.
     * Where do I get a flotation device? The flotation device is on the
       far side of the pool near the middle of the screen. It is a brown,
       deflated, beaver pool float.
     * How do I inflate my flotation device? Go to the kitchen. Click the
       beaver on the road coach's front tire to inflate it.
     * How do I use the flotation device? Click your hand on the pool to
       swim in it. Click the beaver on yourself to ride it. Float over to
       the bar and talk to Merrily.
     * How do I order a drink at the pool bar? Click your hand on the
       beaver's tail to slap it on the water. This will alert the
       underwater waitress that you want to order a drink.
     * Where can I get ID to order a drink? Show your room key to the
       waitress.
     * How can I get Merrily a tower key? Get some soap from the maid's
       cart that appears every now and then outside your room. Wear your
       swimsuit at the pool. Talk to the life guard to get the tower key.
       Use the tower key to climb the tower. Before you dive, click the
       tower key on the soap to make an impression. Dive into the pool,
       get out, put your clothes on and walk to the front desk. Take a
       room key from the Quicki Checkout bin. Use the file on the new
       room key to make a copy of the tower key. You can get the file
       from the plumber if you have bathroom plumbing problems. Give the
       duplicate tower key to Merrily.
     * Finally, I'm on tower with Merrily. What do I do? Click your hand
       and zipper icon several times on Merrily. Click your hand on
       yourself to remove your clothes, then click the zipper on her.
       You'll get Merrily's Words of Wisdom before you fall.
     * Where is Shamara? You can find Shamara in the Penthouse on the
       balcony.
     * How can I get to the Penthouse? Go through the Dining Room to get
       to the Kitchen. Click your hand on the controls next to the
       dumbwaiter to open and enter the dumbwaiter. Click your hand on
       the lower red push-button outside the dumbwaiter to reach the
       Penthouse. Walk to the balcony and talk to Shamara.
     * What does Shamara want? Shamara wants an orchid, a diamond, a
       pearl, a silver bracelet, a modern sculpture made from your melted
       gold medallion, some Words of Wisdom, a Burning Lamp of Knowledge,
       and some chilled champagne.
     * Where can I find all the stuff Shamara wants? You can get an
       orchid from Rose, a diamond from Thunderbird, a pearl from
       Charlotte, a silver bracelet from Burgundy, Words of Wisdom from
       Merrily, and some champagne from Shablee. The champagne can be
       chilled with ice from the ice machine next to your room. The
       burning Lamp of Knowledge can be found on the beach. To make the
       burning Lamp of Knowledge, fill it with cellulite after you help
       Gammie and light it with a match from the bar. Light the match by
       clicking your zipper on it. The modern sculpture created by your
       melted gold medallion can be found after your encounter with
       Charlotte in the Electro-Shock room.
       

63.2289CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Jun 07 1996 17:061
It was June Cleaver who said the Ward was too hard on the Beaver.
63.2290From ESPNETPOWDML::GARBARINOFri Jun 07 1996 17:3933
By Keith Olbermann
Special to ESPNET SportsZone
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Quarantine for Ohio baseball?
Ask not at whom Albert Belle boils... he boils at thee...

This man has become, in the span of eight big league seasons and two
different first names, the baseball superstar most frequently in hot water
since Ty Cobb -- and unfortunately for Albert, the America of 1996 will not
tolerate another Cobb.

You name it, Belle gets angry about it. And writes his own rules about it.
And then, typical to the genre, believes he's being persecuted.

Albert, it's very simple. You can't throw baseballs at fans or
photographers and you can't dress down women reporters with obscenities at
the World Series and you can't put a forearm shiver on the chin of a second
baseman you outweigh by 40 pounds (knock him into the left field corner
with a clean block, but don't stop and try a move that would get you 15
yards in the NFL). You can't, you can't, you can't.

And the irony, of course, is that many good folks in Cleveland can't or
won't see the simple truth here. The Indians have been down so long and
here is one man who as much as any other has brought them up. Trust me on
this: it's better to have a last place team in your town for 40 years than
another Cobb.

It's also possible for anybody -- even Albert -- to spend all his hometown
goodwill. Consider the cross-state saga of Marge Schott. The initial
defensive comments from Reds fans seem to have vanished and there is almost
no one trying to prevent baseball from sweeping her under the rug.
63.2291ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 07 1996 18:279
    
    Maybe Boston stands for "Bus" "town".  
    
    Busing was a overwhelming success in Boston because the people are
    open-minded and tolerant, and they realized that the color of a
    person's skin doesn't matter.  Or was it the other way around - that
    they were racist, bigots?
    
    Please refresh my memory. 
63.2292not completely black and whiteHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 07 1996 18:361
And then there's the EISA, PCMCI and PCI bus wars...
63.2293CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Jun 07 1996 19:025
You know sometimes you just let someone just spout off, because you figure
sooner or later they're going to run out of bile and venom.

Then again, there's always that one exception to what you would normally
expect......
63.2294ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 07 1996 19:133
    
    Don't worry Frank, I'll be out next week (but I can still note a
    little... :-))
63.2296just when you think you know someone...POWDML::GARBARINOFri Jun 07 1996 19:594
>is that we are all Democrats.
>we all hate the Republicans.

NO WAY !!!
63.2298MSBCS::BRYDIEwannabe figure skaterFri Jun 07 1996 21:3818
  >> Way. Boston always votes democratic.

     Not really. We wouldn't have a Republican governor if the largest
     city in commonwealth always voted Democrat. What's more take a good
     look at the makeup of the city govenment. Boston's democrats are
     largely Reagan democrats. It's a fairly conservative city with 
     pockets of liberalism here and there with larger ones in the 
     suburbs. Not that any of this has anything to do with sports.
    
    
      BTW - free speech obviously is not a tenet of this professed
            liberalism or there would not be the constant shouting 
            down of anyone with a dissenting opinion on a certain 
            "sport". Hypocrisy has no politcal stripe.
    

    
63.2300You guys kill meSALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townSat Jun 08 1996 13:5212
    <<< Note 63.2295 by CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" >>>

>  Regardless, the one thing that just about everyone in town seems to share
>in common, bigot or no, is that we are all Democrats. We may disagree on how
>we feel about race but to a person we all hate the Republicans. Unless they
>are the Rockerfeller blue blood type, then they are OK. 

Ah yes, those fond memories of the Dukaka era and the steady 
stream of refugees coming across the NH border to live in some sort 
of sanity...

daryll
63.2301MSBCS::BRYDIEwannabe figure skaterMon Jun 10 1996 12:4431
  >> jumping in late and taking a sliver of the thread out of context. 
  >> Had you seen my earlier note you would have seen where I said blue 
  >> blood Republicans were the exception.

     Methinks you doth protest too much. You said "Boston always
     votes Democrat" and you're wrong. Republican Bill Weld was
     swept into the governor's mansion on the strength of one of 
     the largest margins of vctory in state history and he took 
     the city of Boston by nearly a 3-1 margin. In citywide elections
     the largest vote getter is usually Dapper O'Neil who makes
     Pat Buchanan look like a commmie sympathiszing tree hugger.
     The city is not the liberal bastion that you're painting it.


  >> your side of the figure skating argument is "expressing opinion" 
  >> while any opposition is "goose stepping".

     Someone made the slightest reference to figure skating and you
     threaten them with the figure skating 'debate'. You wield that 
     thing like a cudgel and use it to threaten and harass anyone who
     would dare say anything that goes against your opinion of the
     'sport'. And if they don't toe the line you try and beat them
     into submission with it. That's not free speech. At the very 
     worst it's fascism and at the very least it's censorship and
     it doesn't square at all with your supposed leftist leanings.
     And, on the other hand, you have absolutely no compunction
     about keeping a running commentary on the inadequacies of 
     college basketball and the NCAA tournamanent. And that's
     hypocritical.
    
63.2302CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westMon Jun 10 1996 14:4124
    
    Tommy,
    
    Regardless of the affiliation that politians were voted into office
    under, the state of Massachusetts (and especially Boston) are
    definately democratic in concept.
    
    Can you even imagine an ammendment in Massachusetts proposing special
    rights or discrimination against people of non-heterosexual
    preferences?  Can you imagine a town of 10,000+ where less than 1% of
    the women over the age of 25 work?
    
    I can come up with countless examples of things such as the two above
    that would never occur in Massachusetts but ARE occuring in Colorado. 
    However, if you examine the people in office in Colorado you will find
    that there are quite a few republicans in office.
    
    The affiliation has little to do with the actual actions and behaviors
    of that individual.  For evidence of this, ask someone from France
    (where there are TRUE political parties) how many political parties
    exist in the US of A.  The answer will be 1.
    
    Marc
    
63.2303a real ralph of a nadirHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jun 10 1996 14:4615
>    The affiliation has little to do with the actual actions and behaviors
>    of that individual.  For evidence of this, ask someone from France
>    (where there are TRUE political parties) how many political parties
>    exist in the US of A.  The answer will be 1.

Main, are we in a bind when we're asking some french guys about our
political system!~

And of course, the French quite often give 1 as a standard answer. For
instance, this is their standard answer when asked how many drinks or how
many times they've cheated on their wives.

But ya better be careful or they'll taunt you...

TTom
63.2304LEXSS1::MURPHYMon Jun 10 1996 21:1425
RE: <<< Note 63.2295 by CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" >>>
    
>  Depends on where you are in Boston. There are parts of Boston that are not
> only racist,
    
    I grew up in Boston and take offense to this remark.  Care to back this
    up with some facts.  There are select people in Boston who are racist,
    not "parts of Boston".
    
>  When we 1st moved to the area Patty was going to Suffolk under grad and got a
>job in the personal office. Funny thing she found was that the 1st question
>other workers, who were mostly townies, would ask is where she lived. She came
>to find out that they were trying to get a quick fix on her ethnic background. 

    Funny, most "townies" I know that ask this question are just trying to 
    find out what part of the city you live in.  Can you tell me what the
    ethnic background is of someone that lives in West Roxbury, Dorchester,
    Hyde Park, etc.  
    
>  On the other hand, in some villages like Brighton where we live it's the
>opposite. The area is full of B.C. and B.U. students and middle class people of
    
     Meaning: Carpetbaggers
    
    Dan
63.2305EX tribe member comes back!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Jun 17 1996 18:1218
    
    	Just a few notes......
    
    
    	Greg Swindell is once again an Indian.  He pitched 3+ innings,
    	gave up 3 hits and K'ed 3.  No earn runs!
    
    	Quite the weekend in New York for the Tribe...a split.  Albert
    	gets bats thrown at him from those great NY fans.  
    
    	Report is that Albert's suspension will be reduced.
    
    	Report that Roger Clemens will be trying out for the Indians
    	this week while in town.
    
    	The Chief,
    		WAHOO!
    
63.2306IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jun 17 1996 18:183
>   	Report is that Albert's suspension will be reduced.

Did this come from the Plain Dealer?
63.2307YOU PAY THE MOST TO THE UNION AND YOU GET BETTER REPRESENTEDSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Jun 17 1996 18:2732
                    
    	No,
    
    		It was out of the Sunday or Saturday paper.  Suspension 
    	will go to 3 days at best.  Maybe even less or none at all.  The
    	Players Union put up a huge fight and even called the commiss
    	to the stand for 1.5 hrs.  
    
    
    		W A H O O ! ! !
    
    
    	BTW - Who has the best record in the Major Leagues???
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    			T H E 
    
    			   C L E V E L A N D 
    
    		
    	    	    I    N    D    I    A    N    S    
63.2308SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jun 17 1996 18:535
    
    	Albert's going to be suspended for the 3 games against the Red Sox,
    so the Tribe fans have an excuse for getting swept. :^)
    
    Ron
63.2309Baseballs, garbage, whatever they could get their hands onEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryMon Jun 17 1996 19:3310
>    	Quite the weekend in New York for the Tribe...a split.  Albert
>    	gets bats thrown at him from those great NY fans.  
    
    That was yet another completely disgraceful episode from the 
    partisans of Yankee Stadium...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2310MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Mon Jun 17 1996 19:514
    
      But make no mistake about it, those Yankee fans are just
     like fans every where. Or so I've been told by one or two 
     SPORTS noting Yankee fans. 
63.2311Though it never worked for me,THEMAX::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Mon Jun 17 1996 23:554
      Hey a few beers and a woody in hand and usually people forget about
    what is "really" going on (-)
    
      Tim
63.2312you tell me...POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 18 1996 17:106
>      But make no mistake about it, those Yankee fans are just
>     like fans every where. Or so I've been told by one or two 
>     SPORTS noting Yankee fans. 

Was Barry Bonds in Yankee Stadium last week when he was doused with
a full beer while making a catch in LF ???
63.2313IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue Jun 18 1996 17:432
I will grant that a Yankee fans would never waste a *full* beer by dumping
it on a player - only a partial beer!
63.2314Yankee Stadium - Land O' LosersMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Tue Jun 18 1996 17:4610
    
      I'd hardly equate a beer shower with pelting someone with 
     batteries, bats and baseballs and other items thrown with
     the expressed intent of doing physical damage but then I'm 
     not a Yankees 'fan' so such distinctions don't escape me. Joe, 
     at least three or four times a year you have to come in here 
     and make lame excuses for the neanderthal behavior of the losers 
     who populate the stands at Yankee Stadium. I'd think you'd have
     grown tired of it by now and would just fess up that they're
     scumbags.
63.2315WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Jun 18 1996 17:526
    
    
        No lesser Scum_bags than those who inhabit Fenway.
    
    
    Chap
63.2317Oh yeah, someone once spilt beer on po' Chappy...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 18 1996 18:1016
>        No lesser Scum_bags than those who inhabit Fenway.
    
    Let's review:
    
    
    Yankee Stadium-- batteries, baseballs, and bats...
    
    Fenway Park-- no batteries, no baseballs, no bats...
    
    
    Yep, seems pretty clear to me.
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2318MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Tue Jun 18 1996 18:4011
  >> Notes just wouldn't be the same if this 'discussion' didn't crop up
  >> every summer...
    
     I apologize, Karen if it seems that I'm doing anything but 
     mentioning how my delicate sensibilities are affronted year 
     in and year out by the boorish behavior exhibited by our
     less cultured cousins to the south. Perhaps we might educate 
     them via a film entitled "Proper Fan Behavior - The Fen Way"
     or some such because clearly they are in need of guidance.
    
63.2319everyone has their problems...POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 18 1996 18:546
>     mentioning how my delicate sensibilities are affronted year 
>     in and year out by the boorish behavior exhibited by our
>     less cultured cousins to the south. Perhaps we might educate 
>     them via a film entitled "Proper Fan Behavior - The Fen Way"

proof that pompous arrogance hath no bounds...
63.2320MKOTS3::BREENTue Jun 18 1996 19:039
    I think we have to wait for Albert's appearance at Fenway for the
    comparison.  Shaughnessy etal have made a determined effort to roust
    out Fenway's worst for an all-out assault on Belle although unlike the
    Post's Mathews, the suggestion to toss [baseball] at Belle wasn't
    explicitly made.
    
    Tommy make sure of the size of that crow.  Not that the base argument
    re. the boorishness of the two venues is in question.  The Stadium is
    the pits.
63.2321ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 18 1996 19:2015
    
    For all those who laughed about my comments regarding a possible deal
    between the Red Sox and Indians for Clemens:
    
    1.  Boston Globe speculates that the Sox at best could get one top
    prospect (like in the Cone deal).  I advocated trading two.
    
    2.  One of the players I mentioned was Paul Shuey.  In Shuey's last
    5 outings prior to being recalled his numbers were:
    
    	9 ip, 0 H (YES 0 HITS), 2 BB, 0 R, 15-18 Ks (I don't remember the
    	exact number)
    
    	Since being recalled, he has pitched very well.  He has a clue
    	and he is the real deal.
63.2322ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 18 1996 19:2711
    
    BTW, speaking of the Globe...
    
    Nick Cafardo became still the latest reporter to incorrectly state
    that Belle broke Vina's nose.  Whatever your feelings about the
    incident, it was quickly established that Vina did not suffer a
    broken nose (interviews after the game showing Vina with nary a
    bruise or swelling on his face probably should have been the first
    clue).
    
    Joe
63.2323THEMAX::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Tue Jun 18 1996 21:235
      Was that Hal complaining about fans throwing things at players?
    
      Does batteries and dog bones help with da memory?
    
      Tim
63.2324ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jun 19 1996 00:457
    
    Swindell reportedly had his choice to go to Cleveland or Boston.
    Like what a no-brainer decision.  He could go to Boston with its
    poor drivers, racist attitude, and bad chowder or to Cleveland.
    I wonder how long it took him to decide to take less money in Cleveland
    (hint - less than 15 seconds).
    
63.2325give it upNQOS01::nqsrv239.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYWed Jun 19 1996 03:343
Groaner, does it piss you off that no one ever takes your bad chowder bait?


63.2326bookbinders in Philly has real chowderROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jun 19 1996 03:473
    
    Kind of fitting to mention chowder and bait in the same sentance since
    that's what the chowder tastes like - worms and dirt.
63.2328That Blow was low enough for Westy to catch there KBD!!!!!!!PECAD8::CHILDSWed Jun 19 1996 11:450
63.2329Go Yanks.....BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOWed Jun 19 1996 11:577
    
    OK, Mike I'll bite, Whats KBD???
    
    Karen,  keeping it close,  can't wait for you to buy by a wonderful
    lunch.......
    
    /Westy
63.2330Reminds me of a game last year...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Jun 19 1996 12:0414
    
    	Swindell gets his first win as the Indians come from 6-0 to win
    	the game in Cleveland style 7-9.
    
    	Grand Slam by Omar!!!
    
    
    	Go Tribe!!!
    
    	Chicago now 3 back.....again!
    
    
    		W A H O O ! ! ! 
    
63.2331Yank!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jun 19 1996 13:0712
    
    
    
         Yeah sox fans don't throw batteries or coins. Ask Mickey Rivers
    about the darts and cherry bombs exploding near him after he but Bill
    Lee on the DL. Ask Jim Eisenreich about people out there laughing and
    throwing soda when he was having a convulsion.
    
          Face it Red Sox fans are losers just Yuppie losers.
    
    
    Chap
63.2332POWDML::GARBARINOWed Jun 19 1996 14:277
Does anyone know the "particulars" on the Tavares and Bad Albert
suspensions ?  One report I heard made it sound like Hargrove had
his choice of when they would miss their games.  He said he wanted
Tavares for the Yankees' series 'cause of the Friday doubleheader.

Did the AL say that they would serve their suspensions separately
and Cle had the choice of when on each ?
63.2333from SportszoneHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Jun 19 1996 14:31117
63.2334SNAX::ERICKSONWed Jun 19 1996 14:5714
    
    	It is standard practice that if 2 players get suspended, the
    suspensions don't occur simultaneously. The suspensions aren't geered
    toward putting a team at a disadvantage, but geered towards invidual
    players.
    	Since Cleveland has a double header on Friday, Tavarez will miss
    the Sox series. So Cleveland has enough pitchers for the double header.
    While Albert will miss the double header on Friday and Saturdays game, 
    then play on Sunday. Its a THREE GAME suspension not a three day
    suspension.
    	I'm not sure if Cleveland got to choose who would be suspended
    first.
    
    Ron
63.2335MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 19 1996 15:455
    I agree about with Joe Huber.  This "broken nose/jaw" story should have
    long since been corrected and it's inexcusable for Cafardo to
    reintroduce it - Cafardo should be suspended.
    
    Note in baseball suspensions do not cause loss of pay.
63.2336sox suck, nuff saidROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jun 19 1996 15:497
    
    Nice choke by the Sox last night.  Big Mo and John ValleyWimp came
    through big in the clutch why unhearlded Omar proved once again to 
    be the better SS with the grand slam and 6 RBI.
    
    Anyone get a look at Fernando Vina's 1995 baseball card where he's
    driving his forearm into a catchers face at a play at the plate?
63.2337POWDML::GARBARINOWed Jun 19 1996 16:128
>    Note in baseball suspensions do not cause loss of pay.

I thought I read that they do lose pay.



Thanks for clearing that up for me Ron.  The ESPNET article didn't
answer the questions.
63.2338MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 19 1996 18:023
    No I read where the existing labor agreement prohibits forfeiture of
    pay for that type of suspension.  Missing games while on a boat in
    Arizona, probably yes.
63.2339MuscleFABSIX::R_LUCHTTen Feet Tall and BulletproofThu Jun 20 1996 08:436
	Jose showed Belle who REALLY has the muscle last night, he was smashing
the ball. I've never seen nervous little Albert so well behaved, shows he can't
pick on anyone his own size. Jose is only three dingers back in a lot less at
bats. Maybe Belle can find his swing during his suspension.

						Rich............
63.2340all us injun fans will be crushedROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 20 1996 11:266
    
    Yeah, I wish Cleveland had Jose and the Sox team... because when the
    team sucks, people focus on individual statistics.  It'll be great
    when the Sox don't make the playoffs and you're in here telling us how
    Jose hit 8 less dingers than Belle in a lot less at bats (because he
    was hurt all the time).
63.2341ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 11:385
    
    Tribe sweeps hapless Red Sux again, what else is new.  Maybe Roger
    Dodger Rocket should start pointing fingers at himself and keep his
    mouth shut.  He's dumping on Sele yet he couldn't even hold a 3 run
    lead - he's a choke master.
63.2342ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 12:255
    
    re: .2308
    
    Any more greate predictions Ron?
    
63.2343CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 21 1996 12:3610
  Clemens was hardly dumping on Sele. It looked more like he was trying to
give him a pep talk about how his stuff was really good but he had to get more
aggressive and pitch with more confidence. 

  It's hard to tell exactly what they are saying considering the number of
filters this story is going through but the implication seems to be that they
want Sele to get tough by coming inside on hitters more often even if he risks
hitting a few and having guests visit the mound every now and then. 

  George
63.2344POWDML::GARBARINOFri Jun 21 1996 15:055
Any predictions on the 4-game set vs. NY, Groaner ?  (note, I'm not
asking JoeH 'cause statistically the Yanks don't belong on the same
field with Cle)  With the Yanks throwing 2 rookies in today's
separate-admission doubleheader, a split would be a major victory
for the Pinstripers.
63.2345TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 21 1996 15:2913
    
> (note, I'm not asking JoeH 'cause statistically the Yanks don't belong 
>  on the same field with Cle)
    
    Ummm... when did I say (or even imply) that?  The Yankees certainly
    _do_ belong on the same field with Cleveland; they're better at getting
    on base, and not giving up multi-base hits, worse at keeping runners
    off base, and much worse at hitting for power.  _Beyond_ the White Sox,
    I'm most worried about the Yankees and Rangers...
    
    Even though you didn't ask for it, my prediction - Tribe takes 3/4.
    
    Joe
63.2346Tryin to help....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jun 21 1996 15:418
    
    
        Better check with Bill James on that prediction Joe. By Statistical
    analysis .500 is a much better prediction.
    
    
    
    Chap
63.2347SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jun 21 1996 16:085
    re .2342,
    
    	Albert played.
    
    Ron
63.23489th inning win 5-4! Manny blasts one along with ThomeSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Jun 21 1996 16:5419
    
    	Albert's suspension is reduced to 2 games.....he will miss the
    	double header today.  What time does the game start???  
    
    	The Tribe is hot and it seems that Boston always puts them on
    	the HOT trail!
    
    	Word from Cleveland is that Hart is presenting Clemens with an
    	offer this morning.  Do not know the outcome yet though.  Will
    	post it as soon as work comes in.
    
    
    	The Chief,
    		W A H O O ! ! !
    
    
    
    		GO TRIBE!
    
63.2349ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 17:284
    
    Cleveland will do no better than 2-2, they should go 3-1.  Swindell
    will shut them down completely.
    
63.2350WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jun 21 1996 18:003
    
    
    1-0 Cle top 4.
63.2351ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 21 1996 18:099
    
>    	Word from Cleveland is that Hart is presenting Clemens with an
>    	offer this morning.  Do not know the outcome yet though.  Will
>    	post it as soon as work comes in.
    
    Ummm... hopefully he's presenting _Boston_ with an offer - otherwise
    the tampering police we be on him in a flash...
    
    Joe
63.2352ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 21 1996 18:262
    
    4-1 Cle bot 7.
63.2353ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 18:392
    
    5-1, top of 8th.  Excuses chappy?
63.2354:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jun 21 1996 18:394
    
    
    
       EXCUSE THIS!!
63.2355ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 18:4314
    
    Too bad the Sox can't get a guy like this, but gee, if the fans of the
    team think this guy is not a prospect, the management is probably the
    same - has no clue in judging talent.
    
    Paul Shuey -
    
    Last 7 *MAJOR LEAGUE* appearances.
    
	8 1/3 ip, 3 hits, 0 bb, 7 Ks,  1 save, 1 win.
    
    Looks to me like the guy has gotten it together.  This after this
    several appearances in the minors before being recalled yielded
    9 ip with 0 hits, 3 walks and about 15-18 Ks.
63.2356ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 18:4510
    
    AL       AT CLEVELAND  (1ST GAME) - MID INNING UPDATE 
             PLAY: Paul Assenmacher relieved Charles Nagy.
             SITUATION: 0 RUNS IN, PAUL ONEILL ON FIRST, WADE BOGGS ON 
             SECOND, 1 OUT
             CURRENT SCORE:  NEW YORK       1
                             CLEVELAND      5    TOP, 8TH
    
             DUE UP FOR NEW YORK: T MARTINEZ (.282, 0-FOR-3)
     
63.2357CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 21 1996 18:5611
RE                     <<< Note 63.2355 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

>    Paul Shuey -     Last 7 *MAJOR LEAGUE* appearances.
>    
>	8 1/3 ip, 3 hits, 0 bb, 7 Ks,  1 save, 1 win.
    
  Yeh, but is this clown going to get any Wins or Saves?

  Big deal if all he does is help you with ERA and RATIO.

  George
63.2358ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 19:137
    
    
    George, he has 1 win and 1 save in 9 overall Indians games... 
    that projects out to 18 wins and 18 saves pace...  When he
    takes over Tavarez's role and starts picking up wins left and
    right, then we'll talk again.
    
63.2359WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jun 21 1996 19:247
    
    
        Cle 5 NY 4 Bottom 8. Squirming yet Groaner????
    
    
    
    Chap
63.2360CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 21 1996 19:264
  Is Shuey the guy who's suppose to take over for Mesa one day?

  George
63.2361ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 21 1996 19:312
    
    Shuey or Embree or Graves...
63.2362eBIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOFri Jun 21 1996 19:324
    
    Tied up 6-6 after 8.5 innings
    
    
63.2363ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 19:402
    
    If the Yankmees lose now, its a choke.
63.2364ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 19:403
    
    As Joe said, one of Shuey, Graves or Embree, but my feeling is it will
    be in the order I listed in terms of who gets the shot first.
63.2365ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 19:414
    
    When GWilliams got his hit to lead off the 9th, I sent this to Joe...
    
    send huber gwilliams singles... i got a bad feeling... get SHuey up!
63.2366POWDML::GARBARINOFri Jun 21 1996 19:424
>    Shuey or Embree or Graves...

With so much talent depth, anything but many championship rings over
the next decade is a total organizational failure.
63.2367WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jun 21 1996 19:4911
    
    
    
       I knew you were gonna say that Groaner.
    
    
    Your so predictable!!
    
    
    
    chap
63.2368ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 19:5215
    
    
    I hate when this happens...
    
    AL       AT CLEVELAND  (1ST GAME) - MID INNING UPDATE 
             PLAY: Jeter singled to center, Girardi and Duncan scored,
    Boggs 
             to second.
             SITUATION: 2 RUNS IN, DEREK JETER ON FIRST, WADE BOGGS ON 
             SECOND, 2 OUT
             CURRENT SCORE:  NEW YORK       8
                             CLEVELAND      6    TOP, 10TH
    
             DUE UP FOR NEW YORK: ONEILL (.317, 1-FOR-3, RBI)
     
63.2369WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jun 21 1996 19:585
    
    
          What was that about excuses earlier Groan????
    
       You wanna dine on some crow or what???
63.2370BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOFri Jun 21 1996 19:594
    
    Its now 8-7  Burnitz just homered!!!
    
    
63.2371WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jun 21 1996 20:005
    
    
    
    
    Dooooooooooooooooooooooop
63.2372...and they've never lost a playoff game to the Yanks everROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 20:076
    
    
    Yankmees win 8-7.
    
    You heard it here first, the Indians will not lose a playoff series
    with the Yankmees for the rest of the decade.
63.2373ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 21 1996 20:082
    
    Tavarez is starting game 2 for Cleveland v.s. Ramiro Mendoza.
63.2374WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jun 21 1996 20:0914
    
    Another one going into "THE GROANER FILE!!!!"
    
    
    :-)
    
                    <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.2353                    CLEVELAND INDIANS                   2353 of 2373
ROCK::GRONOWSKI                                       2 lines  21-JUN-1996 14:39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    5-1, top of 8th.  Excuses chappy?
63.2375have a good weekend!BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOFri Jun 21 1996 20:108
    
    Lofton grounded out to end the game, sorry Hal its always nice to win
    that first one!!!!!!
    
    See ya Monday......../westy
    
    PS....whats this I hear about the 60 minute man???
    
63.2376THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE HOME!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Jun 21 1996 20:1415
    
    
    	Ahm....its the 90 minute man Kevin!  We make'em scream!!!
    
    	The Tribe will come back and win the last three!  Belle will
    	be back tomorrow!
    
    	So, who took the loss and the blown save?
    
    	Any of these games on the tube this weekend?
    
    
    		WAHOOOOO!!!
    
    
63.2377PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jun 21 1996 20:161
63.2378POWDML::GARBARINOFri Jun 21 1996 20:2615
>    	The Tribe will come back and win the last three!  Belle will
>    	be back tomorrow!

With the game Burnitz had, maybe you'd have been better off had Bad_Ass
missed the original 5 games.


>    	So, who took the loss and the blown save?

Mesa on both counts.



USAToday.com says Martinez is pitching the nightcap...and that's what
WFAN said yesterday.
63.2379First time I've ever rooted for a NY team...PCBUOA::MORGANSat Jun 22 1996 10:113
    Tribe gets slapped silly twice in one day at home to the Yanks.
    
    					Steve
63.23801918 seems like yesterdayROCK::GRONOWSKISat Jun 22 1996 16:152
    
    This coming from a dunce sox fan.
63.2381ROCK::GRONOWSKISat Jun 22 1996 16:163
    
    What kind of idiot roots for the leader in their teams division unless
    they've already thrown in the towel?
63.2382ROCK::GRONOWSKISun Jun 23 1996 13:163
    
    Tribe is really stinking up the joint... I see the score 5-0, go out,
    come back and find out they lose again.
63.2383problem is... tribe will dump the yanks in the playoffssROCK::GRONOWSKISun Jun 23 1996 22:485
    
    Good thing I'm out half a day on monday and tuesday, otherwise I'd have
    to listed to Chappy on how the Yanks dominated the Tribe at the Jake.
    Bottom line, Yanks now are favored to win it all, anything less is a
    choke... and since they have a higher payroll, it should be expected.
63.2384CHEFS::7A1_GRNGo GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic teamMon Jun 24 1996 09:496
    .2383
    
    Ha ha ha!
    
    
    CHARLEY$bandwagon_Yankees_fan
63.2385HAL watch day 1WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jun 24 1996 12:0426
    
    
    
    
    BAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
    
    
    
           Yanks own the Indians. OWN!!! You Understand OWN!!!
    
       12-2 lifetime at the Mistake called the Jake!
       Dennis Martinez hasn't beat the Yankees since Hinkley was aiming at
    Reagan. 
       Hal had better MOW on some crow today!!!
       
    
         Joe Are you in today Joe? Explain them losses away using one of
    your formulas Joe.
    
         Groaner,   This is too easy
    Bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.Your a riot. Half days my ass!
    
    Joey.....Joey......Joey.....
    
    
    Chap
63.2386ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jun 24 1996 12:1724
    
>         Joe Are you in today Joe?
    
    Yes I am.
    
>     Explain them losses away using one of your formulas Joe.
    
    There isn't a formula to determine who wins or loses a particular
    game.  There _can't_ be - the sample size is too small.  And moreso
    than in any other sport, any team can beat any other team.  Season
    shutouts in baseball are, while not unheard of, relatively rare 
    events.  There are innumerable ocassions when a good team (the
    Yankees) has swept a better team (the Indians).
    
    Obviously we don't need a formula anyway - with the exceptions of
    Swindell, Poole, Embree, and Ogea, Cleveland's pitching stunk.
    
    I will say this - the possibility that the White Sox threat was
    an illusion is becoming apparent; in two short weeks, they've gone
    from leading the league in hitting _and_ pitching (as measured by
    runs scored and runs allowed) to having middle of the pack hitting,
    and pulling back to the pack in pitching.
    
    Joe
63.2387SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jun 24 1996 13:2612
    
    re .2349
    
    Groaner, care to make any more predictions?
    
    >> Cleveland will do no better than 2-2, they should go 3-1. Swindell
    >> will shut them down completely.
    
    	Even the Red Sox don't BLOW 4 games in a row, when they have leads
    like the Tribe HAD.
    
    Ron :^)
63.2388ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jun 24 1996 15:333
    
    Maybe you better go back and check your records... did Cleveland lead
    all 4 games?  No.
63.2389MKOTS3::BREENMon Jun 24 1996 16:091
    So Swindell is now the version of the Indians Lefthanded stopper?
63.2390there must a statistical reason: 'yeah look at W-L since '94'POWDML::GARBARINOMon Jun 24 1996 17:2734
>    What kind of idiot roots for the leader in their teams division unless
>    they've already thrown in the towel?

Or there's something to what some writers have been saying:

	"The Cleveland Indians, the new team America loves to HATE !"

BTW, the Yanks radio crew called Lofton a BIG BABY during Saturday's
game when Thome didn't tag on Lofton's lineout to the outfield.  Lofton
walked back to the dugout at a snail's pace, cast a scowling look at
Thome and threw his helmet.  They quickly pointed out that Lofton must
be thinking only of his personal stats and not the game, as it was the
bottom of the 9th, the lineout was the 2nd out, and the Indians were down 2.
IE: Thome's run wasn't the important one, so why risk getting thrown out
to end the game ???


I don't like Yanks radio announcer John Sterling, but he was right
yesterday in saying that while this was a great accomplishment, over
the long haul it's just 4 of 162 games.  I do disagree with him when
he says it doesn't mean anything in the playoffs.  Sandy Alomar eluded
to the importance of this past weekend when he said, "this is a team
we're likely to face in the playoffs".

It'll be interesting to see if Hart panics into making some *questionable*
acquisitions.  (And Groaner, Clemens has had his own personal days of
hell against the Yanks, so he may not be the answer.)

Would Hargrove dare pitch Martinez against the Yanks in the playoffs ?


Cleveland is just 13-14 in their last 27 games.  I don't think Bad_Ass
has homered since the Vina incident.  Let's see where this team goes
from here.  The true test of a champion is how they handle adversity.
63.2391CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 24 1996 17:3615
RE                    <<< Note 63.2390 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>

>BTW, the Yanks radio crew called Lofton a BIG BABY during Saturday's
>game when Thome didn't tag on Lofton's lineout to the outfield.  Lofton
>walked back to the dugout at a snail's pace, cast a scowling look at
>Thome and threw his helmet.  

  Sounds like a lot of speculation there on the part of the Yankee announcers.
Maybe Lofton was mad at himself because he felt he had a pitch that he should
have hit better.

  Sounds like a typical press thing to do, make assumptions that some athlete
has a bad attitude then bad mouth him about your own speculation.

  George
63.2392PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Jun 24 1996 17:382
63.2393CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 24 1996 17:4612
  How do you know for sure that's who he was looking at?

  Maybe he was giving the 3rd base coach a glare for not sending him. Maybe
something fell out of the left field stands and he was looking to see what
happened. Maybe he was just staring off into space without thinking of who he
was looking at. 

  Sounds so typical for the media to assume that an athlete is doing the most
outrageous thing possible, decide their theory is correct, then comment on it as
if it were a proven fact.

  George
63.2394something familiarHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jun 24 1996 17:475
>  Sounds so typical for the media to assume that an athlete is doing the most
>outrageous thing possible, decide their theory is correct, then comment on it as
>if it were a proven fact.

Sounds like SPROTSters, too...
63.2395POWDML::GARBARINOMon Jun 24 1996 17:556
>  Sounds so typical for the media to assume that an athlete is doing the most
>outrageous thing possible,

Well George, these media guys could have been wrong, but they see 162 games
a year, and these guys have been covering baseball for over a decade, so
I'll trust their judgement.
63.2396a bigger fix is inHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jun 24 1996 17:576
and it's worser than that.

In MLB, the media is the judges, too. They vote on how many points
things like home runs count for.

TTom
63.2397CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 24 1996 18:0517
Re                    <<< Note 63.2395 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>

>Well George, these media guys could have been wrong, but they see 162 games
>a year, and these guys have been covering baseball for over a decade, so
>I'll trust their judgement.

  Remember this is a business. Guys covering sports for the media, the press
and even the team have their jobs because they know their fans and know how to
write copy that sells papers and improves ratings, not because they necessarily
understand the athletes or the sport. 

  Even if they do have the ability to make a good guess as to what some guy is
thinking, I wouldn't trust them as far as I could fling them to tell the truth
if it meant passing up an opportunity to pump up those fans who love to be
outraged at highly paid athlete's and their behavior. 

  George
63.2398George do you own Lofton in any league or something??????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jun 24 1996 18:067
    
    
        Yabbut (sorry Kev) George heard about it third hand from you Joe so
    he must be right.
    
    
    Chap
63.2399CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 24 1996 18:0911
RE  <<< Note 63.2398 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>

>        Yabbut (sorry Kev) George heard about it third hand from you Joe so
>    he must be right.
    
  I'm not the one making claims as to what Lofton was thinking.

  I'm not saying Lofton is innocent of glaring at Thome, I'm saying he is
not necessarily guilty.

  George
63.2400SNARFPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Jun 24 1996 18:141
63.2401CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 24 1996 18:216
  The world not only has shades of gray, it's got colors and waves of light you
don't even see. 

  Black and white went out in the 50's.

  George
63.2402MKOTS3::BREENMon Jun 24 1996 18:2617
    Speaking of media and the least "gray" media person I know, where is
    Will McDonough these days?
    
    Shaughnessy must have read my earlier note because today he's saying
    harass Albert to the max but don't throw anything at him or use racial
    epithets.  Is he clearing something up here?
    
    Cafardo finally, has decided that the Sox will pack it in and dump
    anyone they can to save cash and maybe scare up a prospect.  "It's
    unlikely Cordero will return to second base with the advent of Jeff
    Frye".  The preceding if it can be attributed to anyone in the RedSox
    organization is so far beyond stupidity to make one weep.
    
    Finally speaking of stupidity is the rebuttal of that accusation
    towards Duquette that he subtely moved to crash the Redsox this year in
    order to get rid of Kennedy and sundry other remnants and bring on his
    phenoms?
63.2403we need more black and white, and less blinded-by-the-light !POWDML::GARBARINOMon Jun 24 1996 18:424
>  The world not only has shades of gray, it's got colors and waves of light you
>don't even see. 

What they sellin' in Cambridge these days ???
63.2404PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Jun 24 1996 19:081
63.2405CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 24 1996 19:2222
Re                    <<< Note 63.2403 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>

>       -< we need more black and white, and less blinded-by-the-light ! >-

  Well so far you have neither.

  What you have are:
   - Yankee announcers who see Lofton a few times a year,
   - who are paid to pander to Yankee fans who love to hate Cleveland,
   - who like all sports media types are experts at pumping up envious type
     fans with stories about the outrageous behavior of rich athletes,
   - speculating about what Lofton is looking at then raking him over the
     coals over their own speculation.

  If there is anything close to black and white here it's that we have plenty
of evidence that these type of people lie about this sort of thing and very
little evidence as to what Lofton was actually thinking.

  That's about as black and white as you are going to get unless Lofton comes
clean and 'fesses up as to what he was thinking.

  George
63.2406CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 24 1996 19:267
RE          <<< Note 63.2404 by PHXSS1::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>

>    what color is the sky in the People's Republic of Cambridge?

  Just curious, what's any of this got to do with Cambridge?

  George
63.2407WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jun 24 1996 20:083
    
    
        There must be something in the water.
63.2408PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Jun 24 1996 20:211
63.2409CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jun 24 1996 20:445
  Dense population would be that part of the public which believes that
Yankee announcers can read Kenny Lofton's mind.

  George
63.2410ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jun 25 1996 01:083
    
    Where were all these Yankmee buddies last year when they choked the
    big one away against the wimpy Mariners?
63.2411SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townTue Jun 25 1996 10:516
Better yet, where were all these Indian fans 3 years ago when 
they couldn't fill a mens room forget a stadium.

The ultimate bandwagon jumpers.

daryll
63.2412Indians vs Red Sox for 2BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOTue Jun 25 1996 12:115
    
    Tonites match-ups are   Hershiser 7-4 at  Gordon 5-3,  7:05 start.
    
    Hal have fun......thanks for the coffee and donut......./westy
    
63.2413ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 25 1996 12:1416
    
>Better yet, where were all these Indian fans 3 years ago when 
>they couldn't fill a mens room forget a stadium.
    
    Baloney.
    
    While the Indians had some unimpressive attendence figures, they
    were never in as big an attendence rut as seen in other cities.
    And the current attendence trend dates back to _before_ the Indians
    started winning.
    
    Sure, some of the Indians fans of today are bandwagon jumpers - that's
    inevitable.  But there are also millions of people who rooted for the
    Tribe through 35 years of gloriously incompetent management.
    
    Joe
63.2414SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townTue Jun 25 1996 12:367
Right Joe. Millions who rooted, but preferred not to "root" with 
their wallet and go to the park.

I'd be real interested in seeing attendence figures over the past 
6-7 years and the team's record for those years as well....

daryll
63.2415TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 25 1996 13:2426
    
>Right Joe. Millions who rooted, but preferred not to "root" with 
>their wallet and go to the park.

    Most seasons, the Indians had attendence well over 1 million/year,
    in spite of having a regularly poor team.  When the team was exciting
    (not _winning_ - they really never came close from 1960-1993 - but
    just exciting), they'd pull 1.5-2.0 million.
    
    Am I a poor fan just because I don't attend many Indians games?  I
    lived in Ohio, as an adult, for a grand total of less than three
    months.  At that, I was an hour away from Cleveland Stadium.  My
    family went to a game or two a year.
    
    OTOH, I listened to Indians games whenever I could.  I listened to
    most of Len Barker's perfect game (the rest I watched on TV -
    including Rick Manning's catch to end it.  After hearing Toby Harrah's
    catch, I raced to the TV to catch the replay.).  I fell asleep on many
    occasions trying to catch all of the West Coast games.
    
>I'd be real interested in seeing attendence figures over the past 
>6-7 years and the team's record for those years as well....
    
    I'll try to see if I can dig them up...
    
    Joe
63.2416Yep, maybe something did fall out of the stands...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 25 1996 14:3210
    
    >  Maybe he was giving the 3rd base coach a glare for not sending him.
    
        This would be just as bad as staring down Thome, given the game
        situation.  So the real "maybe" here is, "maybe" George will come
        up with just about anything, even something illogical, to cover a
        player's ass...
    
        glenn
    
63.2417MKOTS3::BREENTue Jun 25 1996 14:395
    But Glenn his base point about not believing the media blindly, ever is
    sound.  This perhaps is a bad example but in general you can pretty
    well count on the media to get it wrong and be biased.  Kevin Mannix of
    the Herald is pretty good about not letting his bias too much into his
    reporting but that's one exception.
63.2418EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 25 1996 14:4415
    
>    Most seasons, the Indians had attendence well over 1 million/year,
>    in spite of having a regularly poor team.  When the team was exciting
>    (not _winning_ - they really never came close from 1960-1993 - but
>    just exciting), they'd pull 1.5-2.0 million.
    
    This is basically another way of saying that attendance was pathetic,
    for modern times.  The same claims can be made on behalf of the 
    Pittsburghs, etc.  And Cleveland is a bigger city/market...
    
    Attendances _under_ 1 million have been rare since about 1980 (1985?)
    or so...
    
    glenn
     
63.2419We're not talking Howard Cosell here-- considercontextEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 25 1996 14:5014
    > But Glenn his base point about not believing the media blindly,
    > ever is sound.  This perhaps is a bad example but in general you 
    > can pretty well count on the media to get it wrong and be biased. 
    
    "Ever"?  I'll leave that to the more cynical among us.  And I'll 
    trust a game broadcaster 100 times more than a sportswriter.  While
    there may be some small ulterior motives, there is no comparison
    with the writer who needs to drum up controversy to sell papers.
    John Sterling criticizing Kenny Lofton (in what sure sounded like a 
    pretty obvious tantrum) is not going to bring viewers flocking to
    the TV sets...
    
    glenn
    
63.2420PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Jun 25 1996 15:057
63.2421Let the fun begin!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Jun 25 1996 15:1212
    
    The Tribe is on the WAR PATH tonight!!!
    
    	I see them circleing.....
    
    
    	I'm still looking for tickets.....there's got to be someone
    out there who doesn't want to see the sox tonight...let me know!
    
    The Chief,
    		W A H O O ! ! ! 
    
63.2422MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Tue Jun 25 1996 15:556
  >> This is basically another way of saying that attendance was pathetic,
  >> for modern times.  The same claims can be made on behalf of the 
  >> Pittsburghs, etc.  
    
     The same claims were made on behalf of Pittsburg - by you.     
    
63.2423EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 25 1996 15:5912
    >> This is basically another way of saying that attendance was pathetic,
    >> for modern times.  The same claims can be made on behalf of the
    >> Pittsburghs, etc.
    >
    >     The same claims were made on behalf of Pittsburg - by you.
     
    That's right.  On behalf of Pittsburgh, the smallest market in 
    baseball.  Not Cleveland, the cultural capital of Ohio.  Not Atlanta,
    the capital of the New South...
    
    glenn
    
63.2424CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jun 25 1996 16:3631
RE      <<< Note 63.2416 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN "Hardball, good ol' country" >>>

>        This would be just as bad as staring down Thome, given the game
>        situation.  So the real "maybe" here is, "maybe" George will come
>        up with just about anything, even something illogical, to cover a
>        player's ass...
    
  Sure what I said is illogical if you clip off the front and back and take
the middle line out of context.

  Within the context what I was saying is that no one can read Lofton's mind.
I offered a list of alternatives not to suggest that one of them had to be
correct, only to illustrate that there were other possibilities.

  But just to use your method of arguing here's what you can do taking
something out of context. 

/Glenn mode on

RE      <<< Note 63.2416 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN "Hardball, good ol' country" >>>
>                                 ... staring down Thome, ...
>                                    ... here is ...
>                       ... an ...               ... illogical ...
>        player's ass...

  How do you know Thome's ass is illogical. Maybe it works just like everyone
else's ass. Glenn will say anything to win an argument. 

/Glenn mode off

  George
63.2425MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Tue Jun 25 1996 16:585
    >> How do you know Thome's ass is illogical. Maybe it works just 
    >> like everyone else's ass. Glenn will say anything to win an argument. 
    
       You have a lot of growing up to do.
63.2426CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jun 25 1996 17:0012
RE        <<< Note 63.2425 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need to talk figure skating." >>>

>    >> How do you know Thome's ass is illogical. Maybe it works just 
>    >> like everyone else's ass. Glenn will say anything to win an argument. 
>    
>       You have a lot of growing up to do.

  Thanks Tommy. I meant to include you when I talked about people who's only
prayer of winning an argument is to take something out of context. Thanks
for doing it in that note and saving me the trouble.

  George
63.2427ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 25 1996 17:157
    
>    Not Cleveland, the cultural capital of Ohio.
    
    Interesting statement.  Not one I'm sure I'd buy, though - 
    Cincinnati and Columbus certainly might dispute the claim.
    
    Joe
63.2428see what you meanHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 25 1996 17:162
Yeah, Cincinnati does have Marge Schott. And then there's that State Fair
thing in the capitol city...
63.2429CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jun 25 1996 17:164
  And what about Dayton?

  George
63.2430Holy Toledo!~HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 25 1996 17:160
63.2431NQOS01::nqsrv139.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYTue Jun 25 1996 17:234
You'd have to give it to Cleveland, just on the merits of the Orchestra.

brews
63.2432CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jun 25 1996 17:256
  Didn't Eliot Ness finish out his career as Cleveland's Police Commissioner?

  That should count for something.

  George
63.2433ta-dumHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 25 1996 17:271
Yeah, Elliot was reuinited with his older brother Loch.
63.2434ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 25 1996 17:4411
    
>You'd have to give it to Cleveland, just on the merits of the Orchestra.
    
    That's certainly one of the arguments for Cleveland.
    
    The Ohio Historical Center and COSI, plus the James Thurber house
    are all in Columbus.
    
    Cincinnati has the best zoo and art musuem in the state.
    
    Joe
63.2435decisions, decisionsPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Jun 25 1996 17:523
63.2436TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 25 1996 18:006
    
    Well, for that matter Cleveland's got a pair of WS rings.
    
    Cincy has Kings Island.
    
    Columbus has the first Wendy's...
63.2437may not have this right, but...POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 25 1996 18:062
Which Ohio city had the Ogelthorpe (?) exhibit ?...later to go to Maewski's
town of Cambridge...
63.2438EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 25 1996 18:076
    
    I thought the Columbus Zoo was the tops?  Been there, and thought
    it was first-rate...
    
    glenn
    
63.2439which oneHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 25 1996 18:118
You talking about them dirty photos or the thug in _Slap Shot_?

The photos were in Cincinnati, home of the KKK crosses.

The ice hokey guy played in Charleston, PA.

FWIW, there's a Cambridge, Ohio. I-70 and I-77 cross there. I've been
stuck there hitchhiking a time or 2.
63.2440MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Tue Jun 25 1996 18:222
    
      It was Mapplethorpe and it was in Cincinnatti.
63.2441Maybe this time ...CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jun 25 1996 18:2711
  And I think they showed it in Boston, not Cambridge.

  Never saw the pictures but they caused Dapper O'Neil popped one of the many
arteries that gives his neck such a deep red color. That alone made the exhibit
worth while.

  Speaking of Red, the Indians travel to Fenway for a couple games. Orel
Hershiser goes for the tribe.

  George
63.2442He played against emSALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townTue Jun 25 1996 18:373
Olgethorp didn't play for Charlestown btw...

daryll
63.2443shore didHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 25 1996 18:384
yeah, like Phog Allen using the 4 corners against Wilt, I got this one
all screwed up.

It's still one of the great sports movies, though...
63.2444SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townTue Jun 25 1996 18:475
I always liked the goalie when they announced his name, 

"Ogletorp?!"

Great movie.
63.2445TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jun 25 1996 19:168
    
>    I thought the Columbus Zoo was the tops?  Been there, and thought
>    it was first-rate...
    
    I haven't been to Columbus' Zoo, but Cincy's is quite good; Cleveland's
    isn't bad, but not in the same class.
    
    Joe
63.2446POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 25 1996 20:118
>    I thought the Columbus Zoo was the tops?  Been there, and thought
>    it was first-rate...
    
>    I haven't been to Columbus' Zoo, but Cincy's is quite good; Cleveland's
>    isn't bad, but not in the same class.


Hey Groaner and JoeH, that's where you beat Boston, in ZOOS !
63.24471 ringie dingie, 2 ringie dingie, 3 ringie dingieSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Jun 26 1996 17:4632
    
    	DING,
    		DING,
    			DING!!!
    
    
    	Can you spell....
    
    		H O M E R U N ! ! !
    
    	Great Game last night!!!!  Great pitching...Oral has a wicked
    curve!  
    
    	Was funny though...Albert had more boooo's than Mo had Raw's!
    
    	One thing that must be said though, in Albert's 2nd at bat,
    	while in the batters box, Carlos hits a foul and the batboy
    	gets the ball.  Albert motions to the batboy for the ball.
    	Albert takes the ball, walks over to the crowd and gives the
    	ball to this little kid sitting in the stands.  
    
    	Now did this get mentioned on TV or ESPN or the Newspaper today???
    	NO!  What a bunch of crap!  or is this just some PR work being
    	done by the best?
    
    	The Indians OWN the Red Sox.....OWN I said!  Do you need help is
    	its spelling.....how about this...15-0!  Great article in the 
    	telegram this morning.....
    
    
    	W A H O O ! ! !
    
63.2448CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Jun 26 1996 18:2110
> Oral has a wicked curve!  
    

I knew a girl like that once.

But what about OrEl Hersch-whatever-his-name-is?  Didn't HE pitch last night
8^)



63.2449CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jun 26 1996 18:234
  Orel Hershiser

  George
63.2450SNAX::ERICKSONWed Jun 26 1996 18:536
    
    	The Sox have NEVER lost an entire season series. Is tonight
    there last chance for this season? Or do they play another 3
    series in Cleveland?
    
    Ron
63.2451CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jun 26 1996 19:0313
  They were saying on the news this morning that the Red Sox could break a
record tonight that they wouldn't want to break but I didn't catch what it was.
Maybe that's it. 

  Funny the way the schedules have been done this year, the Sox are going to be
just about done if not all done with the Indians and they are just beginning
with the Yankees. 

  Same thing happened with the White Sox, Brewers, and Twins. Two of those
three were done with each other (I think the White Sox and Brewers) before
one of those teams had seen the Twins.

  George
63.2452Maris'/Ruth's Marks Appear Safe for Another YearPOWDML::GARBARINOWed Jun 26 1996 19:2310
>    	ball to this little kid sitting in the stands.  
    
>    	Now did this get mentioned on TV or ESPN or the Newspaper today???
>    	NO!  What a bunch of crap!  or is this just some PR work being
>    	done by the best?


He'll have to do a lot more than that to turn his image around.

BTW, when was his last HR ?  Can we start a "Day_x" watch for this ??
63.2453AWECIM::RUSSOclaimin!Wed Jun 26 1996 19:444
    
    The Red Sox play the Indians for the last time this season (that
    includes post-season!!) tonight.
    
63.2454TICK TICK TICKSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Jun 26 1996 19:479
    
    	The Red Sox wouldn't give him the change last night in the ninth.
    	Intentional walk!...
    
    	Go Albert!
    
    		He'll get #26 tonight!
    
    
63.2455CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jun 26 1996 19:5111
RE                    <<< Note 63.2452 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>

             -< Maris'/Ruth's Marks Appear Safe for Another Year >-

  Well last week he didn't hit a home run. He was 5 for 20 with a couple
doubles and a stolen base. Not exactly a slump.

  Remember, last year he got really hot the last couple months of the season.
It would take a charge at the end but I wouldn't call those records safe yet.

  George
63.2456MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 26 1996 20:032
    I think McGuire hit #24 last night.  If healthy he is a big, big threat
    to Maris record and Ruth's too since he'll be doing it in less games.
63.2457CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jun 26 1996 20:1012
  Of course McGuire was the guy who's name became a household word about a
decade ago because he hit 30 home runs the 1st half of the season. Then he
tailed off in the 2nd half and the threat was ended. 

  He gets injured too much to break that record, a problem Griffey seems to be
facing now as well. 

  As for Griffey, maybe it's time Lou had a talk with him to point out that the
few extra catches he makes crashing into the wall don't make up for the time he
loses with his wrist in a cast. 

  George
63.2458IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanWed Jun 26 1996 20:115
>  As for Griffey, maybe it's time Lou had a talk with him to point out that the
>few extra catches he makes crashing into the wall don't make up for the time he
>loses with his wrist in a cast. 

You own him in a Rotisserie league, don't you, George?
63.2459CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jun 26 1996 20:1610
RE  <<< Note 63.2458 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "It's Baseball And You're An American" >>>

>You own him in a Rotisserie league, don't you, George?

  Wish I did. Or Lofton, I'd take either one.

  I do have Bonds on one team, and I've got Ruben Rivera waiting in the wings
on another.

  George
63.2460MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 26 1996 20:197
    George, 
    	McGuire's already had his injury.  That guy really seems to be able
    to stack up the homeruns in a hurry and isn't walked around like
    Thomas.  
    
    	We must remember that Albert stacked 'em up pretty well last
    September.
63.2461CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jun 26 1996 21:087
  Yeh, maybe McGuire could do it but somehow I don't think having had an injury
precludes it happening again. Nor does it preclude a slump. 

  Sure, maybe he can do it but if I had to bet on someone breaking the record
any year soon it would be Belle 1st and Griffey 2nd.

  George 
63.2462AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherThu Jun 27 1996 10:2110
    
    
      The record the Sox broke (I'm assuming they finshed with a L) was it
    was the first time in Sox history the got SWEPT in a season series.
    It don't get any worse than this.  Roger pitches another solid game
    Stanton comes in gets the broken bat ground ball but it finds a hole.
    Whatever will go wrong will which is the total opposite of last year.
    
    
    
63.2463They actually pulled one out.LUDWIG::BTOWERThu Jun 27 1996 11:013
    No, the record is safe. They came back and won it last night. Don't
    know the details but they won it in extra innings. I think Naehring
    hit a 2 run dinger to win it. 
63.2464Hard to believeFABSIX::R_LUCHTTen Feet Tall and BulletproofThu Jun 27 1996 11:075
	Yeah, they scored 3 in the 9th to tie it, and then Naering hit a two run
dinger in the 15th to win it. Jose and Valentin also homered. A good win, it
showed a little character I really thought they were lacking.

							Rich.......
63.2465History on the line, and a miracle: Mesa gacks it upEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 27 1996 12:5610
    
    I didn't stay up for the 15th, but the 9th was batting practice 
    served up by Jose Mesa.
    
    I don't think the Indians are such a lock in the playoffs as their
    fans think they are.  Sure, they can bludgeon you to death, but I
    don't like their late-inning makeup with this bullpen.
    
    glenn
    
63.2466TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 27 1996 13:0310
    
    Actually, until this past weekend, the bullpen has been a clear
    _strength_, not a weekness.  If Mesa falters, there's plenty of
    candidates to take his job.
    
    I'm just bothered by the decision to go with only 11 healthy
    non-pitchers.  After Burnitz went in yesterday (was Lofton
    injured?), the only guy on the bench was Pena...
    
    Joe
63.2467In the postseason bullpen, I want talent, experienceEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 27 1996 13:1013
    
>    Actually, until this past weekend, the bullpen has been a clear
>    _strength_, not a weekness.  If Mesa falters, there's plenty of
>    candidates to take his job.
    
    That's on paper, statistically (so far).  But when the money's on the 
    line, I again would not trust Assenmacher, Plunk, Shuey et al if Mesa 
    falters (and I think Mesa's run may be winding down).  I think the
    Indians would want the proven stud out there.  In the playoffs a 
    Paul Shuey could be the next Calvin Schiraldi...
    
    glenn
    
63.2468EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 27 1996 13:147
    
    In a related topic, homeplate umpire Larry Young was found guilty of
    trying to read the temperamental Kenny Lofton's mind, but nonetheless
    tossed his sorry butt out of the park one out into the contest...
    
    glenn
    
63.2469IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Jun 27 1996 13:259
>    In a related topic, homeplate umpire Larry Young was found guilty of
>    trying to read the temperamental Kenny Lofton's mind, but nonetheless
>    tossed his sorry butt out of the park one out into the contest...


Well, this is a relief.

Signed,
Kenny Lofton's Rotisserie owner
63.2470CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 13:5017
RE      <<< Note 63.2467 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN "Hardball, good ol' country" >>>

>In the playoffs a 
>    Paul Shuey could be the next Calvin Schiraldi...
    
  That might not be bad. Calvin Schiraldi was an effective closer down the
stretch in a tight pennant race, helped the Sox through the A.L.C.S. and came
one lucky swing away from being a World Series hero. And that was back in the
day when being a closer meant you came in around the 7th inning and went the
distance.

  As for the impossible to control Lofton who's mind can be read by every
member of the press looking for a story, except for Seattle I can't think of a
single team that wouldn't be improved right now by swapping their center
fielder for Lofton. 

  George
63.2471Nice memory George...Schiraldi sucked in entire postseasonEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 27 1996 14:3317
    
> That might not be bad. Calvin Schiraldi was an effective closer down the
> stretch in a tight pennant race, helped the Sox through the A.L.C.S. and came
> one lucky swing away from being a World Series hero. 
    
    No.  Calvin Schiraldi was an effective closer down the stretch, 
    damned near singlehandedly drowned the Sox through the ALCS, and
    came one lucky swing away from being bailed out of a save 
    opportunity he'd already blown in the 8th, way way back in the 
    days when being a closer meant you could come in and get at least
    one out before self-destructing...
    
    Which was the point about Shuey; I don't care how good he's looked
    against the Sox, I wouldn't trust him in the playoffs.
    
    glenn
    
63.2472ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 27 1996 14:5413
    
>  As for the impossible to control Lofton who's mind can be read by every
>member of the press looking for a story, except for Seattle I can't think of a
>single team that wouldn't be improved right now by swapping their center
>fielder for Lofton. 
    
    Actually, right at the moment Lofton certainly _would_ improve
    Seattle... B^).
    
    I'm not convinced the Yankees or Angels (when Edmonds is there) would 
    be _improved_ w/ Lofton.
    
    Joe
63.2473WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Jun 27 1996 15:454
    
    
        I wouldn't trade Bernie or Ruben Rivera's future (CF) for Lofton,
    no way.
63.2474PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jun 27 1996 16:166
63.2475ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 27 1996 17:2413
    
>        I wouldn't trade Bernie or Ruben Rivera's future (CF) for Lofton,
>    no way.
    
    I'd be careful w.r.t. Rivera; I can see him having a career similar
    to another Ruben on the Yankees.
    
    Whether or not I'd trade Bernie for Lofton would depend entirely
    upon the situation of my team.  w/ the Indians, I want Lofton.  With
    the Yankees, Bernie's a better pick.  Therefore, at present a trade
    makes _no_ sense for either side.
    
    Joe
63.2476SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townThu Jun 27 1996 17:435
Is Rivera the latest "next Mickey Mantle"?

Where is Kevin Maas these days?

daryll
63.2477CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 17:5016
  For center field I'd take Lofton over Bernie Williams. His defense is
outstanding, he steals bases, his average is about the same and his runs
created per game is less than half a point behind Williams. 

  From last season:

    Name             Rc      Rcg   gms   avr   Ab  Ht   Hr   Tb  Sb  BB  So
 Bernie Williams   105.308  7.180  144 0.307  563 173.  18  274   8  75  98
 Kenny Lofton       86.283  6.714  118 0.310  481 149.   7  218  54  40  49

  Sure wouldn't mind having Lofton on the Red Sox instead of the rotating
wonders from Pawtucket we've seen thus far. It would be worth putting up
with all those negative telepathic images that he beams directly into the
minds of those in the press box.

  George
63.2478ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 27 1996 17:579
    
    So George,
    
    Even on a team _loaded_ with guys who get on base, and with almost
    _no_ power, you'd still take Lofton?
    
    Thank you, no.
    
    Joe
63.2479CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 17:5816
RE  <<< Note 63.2476 by SALEM::DODA "A little too smart for a big dumb town" >>>

>Is Rivera the latest "next Mickey Mantle"?

  Yes, he's suppose to be the next Yankee star outfielder.

  Up through last season he had great years working up to the AA level and
looked good in spring training this year. When the regular season started he
started out slowly at AAA Columbus. He got called up to the big league club 
when Raines went on the DL and looked good at 1st then faded a bit. Last week
he got sent back to AAA.

  Still Baseball America has him listed as #3 on their list of the top 100
prospects.

  George
63.2480WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Jun 27 1996 18:0113
    
    
     Joe, you really don't know what your talking about do you? Comparing
    Rivera to Sierra?
    
       Not a clue.
    
        Read the farm reports. Delve into Rivera's life. Find out about his
    personality. Christ I bet even your guru Bill James has good things to
    say about him.
    
    
    Chapo
63.2481WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Jun 27 1996 18:0510
    
    
    I think Maas plays at Triple A somwhere. There is no next Mickey
    Mantle! Where did you get that from? Mickey was one of a kind.
    
    
        Go back to making fun of your LFer Darryl.
    
    
    Chap
63.2482CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 18:069
RE       <<< Note 63.2478 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>    Even on a team _loaded_ with guys who get on base, and with almost
>    _no_ power, you'd still take Lofton?
    
  I think that Rivera will solve the no power problem. You could do worse than
an outfield of Gerald Williams, Kenny Lofton, Ruben Rivera with O'Neill at DH. 

  George
63.2483WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Jun 27 1996 18:074
    
    
    
    Yeah look at Boston for the past 15 years.
63.2484EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 27 1996 18:5119
    
>     Joe, you really don't know what your talking about do you? Comparing
>     Rivera to Sierra?
>    
>     Not a clue.
    
    Why not?  At the same age, Sierra was considered All-Tools, All-
    Universe too.  And I wouldn't be a bit surprised to learn that 
    Sierra's minor-league _performance_ was much better than Rivera's
    at this stage in his career (nothing too too spectacular so far--
    everyone is going on reputation and scouting reports at this point).
    
>    Delve into Rivera's life. 
    
    Not a chance.  Like Heiser, I have a life.
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2485SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townThu Jun 27 1996 18:5710
WAKE UP Chappy. That "next Mantle" tag has been pinned on no less 
than 3 NY rookies over the past few years with Buhner being the 
other one that immediately comes to mind.

Meanwhile, just how many things were tossed/beers poured over 
Joey in Fenway the past couple days?

Tell us again how fans are the same everywhere...

daryll
63.2486ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 27 1996 19:0344
    
>    Joe, you really don't know what your talking about do you?
    
    Only time will tell...
    
>    Comparing Rivera to Sierra?
    
    Why not?  Sierra came up at age 21 (or was it 20?), with lots of
    power, decent speed, and draw a few walks (though not an overwhelming
    number).
    
    That's about where Rivera is (actually, Rivera's a bit older, but
    is a better fielder).
    
>       Not a clue.
 
    We shall see...
       
>    Read the farm reports.
    
    Done that.
    
>    Delve into Rivera's life. Find out about his personality. 
    
    Personality has _some_ impact upon success, but I'll take talent
    nearly every time...
    
>    Christ I bet even your guru Bill James has good things to
>    say about him.
    
    Um - Chappy - I wasn't trying to say anything bad about him.
    Remember, Sierra came _very_ close to winning an MVP award; his
    career, while not HoF caliber, has been quite good overall.  I
    think Rivera will have a good career, and could well win an MVP
    award.  I just don't think he'll be a HoFer, or come particularly
    close to it.
    
    And for the last time, Bill James is _not_ my guru.  James, in
    his early years, did some groundbreaking work - much of which has
    since been surpassed by others.  He had a significant effect on the
    way baseball is watched.  And he made the usual boatload of errors
    in the process.
    
    Joe
63.2487ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 27 1996 19:056
    
    George, NY's power problem is _far_ too deep for one player to solve -
    _particularly_ when you talk about giving up their best slugging player
    in the process...
    
    Joe
63.2488CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 19:2214
RE       <<< Note 63.2487 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>    George, NY's power problem is _far_ too deep for one player to solve -
>    _particularly_ when you talk about giving up their best slugging player
>    in the process...
    
  Fine, but I'm only talking about giving up one player in B. Williams whom
I would replace with Rivera.

  Granted he's a prospect but I like prospects. Watching Ruben Rivera to see
how he handles the Mick's shoes sounds like a lot more fun than watching
Ruben Sierra.

  George
63.2489TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 27 1996 20:1825
    
>>    George, NY's power problem is _far_ too deep for one player to solve -
>>    _particularly_ when you talk about giving up their best slugging player
>>    in the process...
    
>  Fine, but I'm only talking about giving up one player in B. Williams whom
>I would replace with Rivera.

    I realize that.  My point is that the Yankees would be better off
    with Williams and Rivera than Williams and Lofton, given the rest
    of their cast.
    
>  Granted he's a prospect but I like prospects. Watching Ruben Rivera to see
>how he handles the Mick's shoes sounds like a lot more fun than watching
>Ruben Sierra.
    
    But will it be more fun that it was watching Ruben Sierra ten years
    back, when he was breaking in?
    
    I've never shied away from prospects, and for good reason - there
    exists the chance the Rivera will be phenominal; moreso than with
    most prospects.  But IMHO his career course will likely resemble that 
    of Sierra.
    
    Joe
63.2490ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 27 1996 20:2212
    
    
    Mesa stunk up the joint to prevent the sweep.  He said afterwards that
    he felt sorry for the Sox, so he let them catch up.
    
    In regards to Chappy's analysis of talent I only have to mention the
    following trade he made a couple of years back:
    
    		Chappy gets Dan Gladden
    		Gronowski gets Juan Gonzalez
    
    'nuff said
63.2491WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jun 28 1996 11:4514
    
    
       That was my first year in Rotis and Juan was just called up for the
    first time.
    
    
        How about this quote???
    
             I'd rather have Jeter than Albert Belle.  Remember who said
    this? Or do you want me to post it?
    
    
    
    Chap
63.2492ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 28 1996 12:0910
    
>    I'd rather have Jeter than Albert Belle.  Remember who said
>    this? Or do you want me to post it?
    
    What's wrong with that quote?  Short term, Belle's the better player.
    Jeter likely will never become as good a _hitter_ as Belle is now.
    But given his defensive contributions, he might become a better
    _player_; he's also likely to have a longer peak than Belle.
    
    Joe
63.2493All things consideredMUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldFri Jun 28 1996 12:407
>            I'd rather have Jeter than Albert Belle.  Remember who said
>   this? Or do you want me to post it?

Well, I didn't say it, but when I consider the pluses and minuses of both
players, I kind of wish I had.

Steve
63.2494ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 28 1996 13:384
    
    Chappy, how about we talk about the Jeter v.s. Belle comment at the end
    of the year when Albert is a free agent and the likelyhood of him
    winding up in Colorado is about 87.5443290%.
63.2495ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 28 1996 13:394
    
    
    Not only that... aren't you the guy who turned down the Rivera +
    O'Neill for Belle deal last year?
63.2496OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsFri Jun 28 1996 14:223
    
    We had Belle here in the Springs while playing as Joey for the SkySox, 
    you can keep him. 
63.2497ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 28 1996 15:263
    
    Belle would hit 70-80 HRs playing in that stadium.  He'd probably have
    45-50 at home!
63.2498OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsFri Jun 28 1996 15:474
    
    I do not recall him being that great here at 6035 ft while playing
    for the farm team. No PCL records for dingers etc; Every time he got
    called up, they sent him back down for a attitude adjustment.
63.2499CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 28 1996 15:519
  He's learned to hit the long ball since then with regularity.

  He'd go nuts in that stadium if he played there any time soon. The Rockies
would run up football totals every game.

  Well almost every game.

  George
63.2500SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jun 28 1996 15:5716
    
    
    	You put any one of the following players in Coors Field and
    your will see 65 HRs, Belle, Vaughn, Griffey, Bunher, Thomas, or
    maybe even Sammy Sosa. Sosa already plays in the NL, and wouldn't
    have to adjust to the pitchers. The players I mentioned except
    Bunher have consistently hit over .300, so the NL pitchers shouldn't
    effect them that much.
    	ESPN put up this years stats for Colorado based on home and
    away games. The trend of the last 2/3 years is continuing. Colorado
    is hitting TWICE as many HR's at home then away, plus all other
    stats including batting average was a lot higher at home.
    
    
    
    Ron
63.2501ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 28 1996 17:318
    
    So if you use the 2:1 ratio and assume Belle's HRs were split equally
    last year that would give him 25 on the road and 50 at home => 75
    total.  Trust me, some big power hitter is going to eventually make it
    to that banjobox and destroy the single season HR record.
    
    I'd knock Sosa off the list, no way would he hit 65, but I would add
    McGwire to the list.
63.2502TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jun 28 1996 17:479
    
>    Trust me, some big power hitter is going to eventually make it
>    to that banjobox and destroy the single season HR record.
    
             ^^^^^^^^
    
                "thin air" would work much better there...
    
    Joe
63.2503ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 01 1996 13:0328
    
    In his Sunday Column, Gammons indicated that he'd take Boggs for
    his all-* team, in a close race over Naehring, Sprague, and Ventura.
    
    			OBP		SLG
    Boggs		.406		.421
    Naehring		.409		.539
    Sprague		.365		.571
    Ventura		.371		.502
    
    Now, among those four, Boggs is not an unreasonable choice.  Wouldn't
    be _my_ choice (I'd have to go with Naehring among that group), but
    Boggs isn't unreasonable.
    
    However, there's another AL third baseman with the following stats:
    
    Player A		.457		.602
    
    Why, if Player A is a regular AL third baseman, would you even
    consider the four guys listed above?  He's far better at _both_
    getting on base _and_ hitting for power than any of them.  It can't
    be because of speed; Player A and Naehring are each at 1 SB, 1 CS:
    Boggs and Ventura at 0/2, and Sprague at 0/0.  Sprague's a bit ahead
    in the RBI race (the order being Sprague - Ventura - Player A -
    Naehring - big gap - Boggs), but Player A leads the pack in runs
    scored (followed by Sprague, Ventura & Boggs, and Naehring).
    
    Joe
63.2504IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jul 01 1996 13:102
Why not stop playing games and put Thome's name in there?
63.2505WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 01 1996 13:113
    
    
    Seitzer??
63.2506MKOTS3::BREENMon Jul 01 1996 13:171
    Did you also check Dean Palmer?
63.2507SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jul 01 1996 13:277
    
    	Naehring was making a case for himself this weekend. Detroit
    could not get a ball hit on the ground past him. I remember last
    year everybody was worried about Tim's defense at 3B. IMO he has
    been a better 3B, then he every was at SS or 2B.
    
    Ron
63.2508IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jul 01 1996 13:342
If it's not Thome, then what's it doing in the Indians' note?  :-)
63.2509CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 13:389
  It should be Boggs. Remember, this is not the "best player" game or the
"Hottest spring" game it's the "All Star" game.

  Boggs is a star. The rest of the guys are not stars.

  If he were having a bad year then fine, time for a new star but he's having
a really good year so he should get the nod.

  George
63.2510ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 01 1996 13:3819
    
> Why not stop playing games and put Thome's name in there?
    
    Sorry, I thought it was obvious.  My original intent was to post
    numbers, but no players, and I got off-track mid thought.
    
    For those interested, other AL third basemen:
    
    			OBP		SLG
    
    Surhoff		.341		.496
    Fryman		.322		.460
    Seitzer		.446		.517
    Cirillo		.398		.506
    Hollins		.367		.388
    Giambi		.370		.536
    Palmer		.364		.544
    
    Joe
63.2511ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 01 1996 13:4222
    
>  It should be Boggs. Remember, this is not the "best player" game or the
>"Hottest spring" game it's the "All Star" game.

    1) I agree that it should not be solely based upon who's having the
       best first half.  Thome was the best third baseman in the AL last
       year as well.
    
>  Boggs is a star. The rest of the guys are not stars.

    Ah - so then Sandy Alomar should be the starting catcher?
    
>If he were having a bad year then fine, time for a new star but he's having
>a really good year so he should get the nod.
    
    You can certainly vote that way; I have no particular problem if the
    fan vote goes to Boggs.
    
    But the remainder of the roster _has_ been a collection of the best
    players.
    
    JOe
63.2512CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 14:1418
RE       <<< Note 63.2511 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>    Ah - so then Sandy Alomar should be the starting catcher?

  Ivan Rodriguez is a star and should be the starting catcher. He's been on the
all-star team before, he's having a great 1st half and he's been a consistently
good catcher for years. 
    
>    You can certainly vote that way; I have no particular problem if the
>    fan vote goes to Boggs.

  Actually I voted for Tim Naehring. At the game I was at where they handed
out the ballots he hit a grand slam home run in the 1st inning then made
a great defensive play just before they handed out the ballots. After seeing
that I felt, what more can a guy do to get your vote? Since he was one of
the contenders anyway I punch in his name.
    
  George
63.2513SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townMon Jul 01 1996 14:244
I'd take Dan Wilson over Pudge this year. Wilson is having a 
career year and deserves the start.

daryll
63.2514ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 01 1996 14:394
    
    Joe, we both know Thome is the best offensive 3B in the AL bar none.
    Gammons is an idiot.  How many times do we have to say this?
    
63.2515George got it rightMUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldMon Jul 01 1996 14:4711
If you wanted an All Star Game played by the best in the game, you would
probably have it selected by experts (and it would still be controversial).
But as George pointed out, this is all about *stardom*, a quality that can
only be conferred by the public, that's why the fans vote for the teams.

In passing, I would add that even the experts might have a reason for
choosing someone other than Thome.  He's playing in a park that favors
offense, he is well protected in the Indians' terrifying batting order,
and he is not exactly Brooks Robinson on defense.

Steve
63.2516ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 01 1996 15:1725
    
>In passing, I would add that even the experts might have a reason for
>choosing someone other than Thome.  He's playing in a park that favors
>offense, 
    
    Not convincingly true.  Last year, Jacobs Field was a pitcher's
    park - both the Indians and their opponenets scored more runs
    elsewhere than at the Jake.
    
    At Jacobs: 400 Runs scored, 272 Runs allowed
    Elsewhere (equal # of games): 440 Runs scored, 335 Runs allowed
    
>    he is well protected in the Indians' terrifying batting order,
    
    ...and no study of the matter has shown any significant effect
    from protection (except that it reduces intentional walks)...
    
>and he is not exactly Brooks Robinson on defense.
    
    No, but he's got above average range, and makes an average number
    of errors.  Of the four Gammons mentioned, only Naehring has a clear
    defensive edge over Thome, and I'd take Thome's defense before 
    Sprague's.
    
    Joe
63.2517Check it outMUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldMon Jul 01 1996 15:3012
Well, I had occasion to look it up a couple of weeks ago, and my recollection
is that Jacobs Field is very much a home run park, which of course is a
significant portion of Thome's imposing slugging percentage.  The reliability
of my memory, however, has been called into question in this forum and
elsewhere (can't offhand think just where).

But the numbers aren't really the issue.  The perception is, and that's
what the fans are voting on.  It's interesting that Thome is being overlooked
*despite* postseason exposure, the lack of which is most commonly the reason
that an otherwise deserving player is slighted.

Steve
63.2518ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 01 1996 15:344
    
    Who said Thome is being overlooked.  Hargrove picks the reserves,
    doesn't he?
    
63.2519He should definitely goMUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldMon Jul 01 1996 15:409
Oh, I fully expect him to be there.  The point is that despite having played
and starred in the postseason last year and putting up stellar numbers this
year, he still doesn't have sufficient star quality to be voted in by the
fans.  Frankly, he'd have a good shot at my vote, if I were voting, though
it's not as clear cut as some positions.  But he doesn't seem to have been
able to capture the imagination or attention of the fan at large.  Why, I
wonder?

Steve
63.2520ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 01 1996 15:475
    
    I think Thome was second in balloting and with the Indians sold out
    for the entire year, he still might have a shot.  I haven't seen
    the latest all-star vote totals.
    
63.2521CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 15:549
  I don't think they are taking ballots any more. I was at Fenway Friday night
and we didn't get ballots.

  There's nothing wrong with Thome as a 2nd selection but I wouldn't say he
stands out ahead of Boggs, Naehring, Ventura and the others. In fact if given
my choice of A.L. 3rd basemen I'd take Jeff Cirillo from the Brewers. He's
starting to play like an all-star and he's got more of a future then the rest. 

  George
63.2522IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jul 01 1996 15:595
>Well, I had occasion to look it up a couple of weeks ago, and my recollection
>is that Jacobs Field is very much a home run park, which of course is a
>significant portion of Thome's imposing slugging percentage. 

For 1995, Jacobs Field was almost an *exactly* average home run park.
63.2523ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 01 1996 17:1211
    
>  There's nothing wrong with Thome as a 2nd selection but I wouldn't say he
>stands out ahead of Boggs, Naehring, Ventura and the others. In fact if given
>my choice of A.L. 3rd basemen I'd take Jeff Cirillo from the Brewers. He's
>starting to play like an all-star and he's got more of a future then the rest. 
    
    Cirillo's got more of a future than Thome, who's a year younger?
    
    Yeah, right.
    
    Joe
63.2524ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 01 1996 17:236
    
    Joe, I bet if we look at George's rotis roster he has Cirillo and not
    Thome...  I love this excuse anyways "He's starting to play like an
    all-star".  When did he start playing like one, last week?  last month?
    at the start of the season?
    
63.2525CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 17:484
  His numbers look pretty good to me. He seems to have the 3rd base job for
the Brewers pretty much locked up.

  George
63.2526ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 01 1996 17:493
    
    "He seems to have the 3rd base job for the Brewers pretty much locked
    up" *DOES NOT* mean he is an all-star. 
63.2527CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 17:594
  I have a good feeling about him and I think he's going to be an all-star.

  George
63.2528ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 01 1996 18:0413
    
    George, Cirillo's numbers _are_ pretty good.
    
    Thome's are significantly better.
    
    Their numbers (together, this time, so no one has to flip
    back and forth between notes):
    
    			OBP		SLG
    Cirillo		.398		.506
    Thome		.457		.602
    
    Joe
63.2529Spin Control????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 01 1996 18:073
    
    
        Looks Like Thome's are a little better George.
63.2530CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 19:0011
  I'd still take Jeff Cirillo as my 3B if given a choice of what's out there
today. When you throw in defense and the rate at which he's been improving
the last couple years I think he's going to be all-star caliber for some time
to come.

  Everyone on that list is a fine 3rd baseman but I just don't see where
Thome stands out above the rest. Fine, he's having a hot 1st half on a team
where he's surrounded by great hitters but over the next 5 years I still feel
Cirillo will be the better all around 3rd baseman.

  George
63.2531ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 01 1996 19:208
    
    Thome is younger, and better than Cirillo, and I think history will
    prove him to be a much better player when all is said and done.
    
    Now, using the "surrounded by hitters" arguement, I think that even
    makes a stronger case for Thome (if you believe this is valid - and
    I don't) - because Milwaukee leads the league in runs scored, so
    obviously Cirillo is benefitting from a better line-up.  
63.2532ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 01 1996 19:3441
    
>  Everyone on that list is a fine 3rd baseman but I just don't see where
>Thome stands out above the rest. Fine, he's having a hot 1st half on a team
>where he's surrounded by great hitters but over the next 5 years I still feel
>Cirillo will be the better all around 3rd baseman.
    
    George...
    
    OK, I'll present OBP and SLG numbers for _last_ year, for leading
    AL all-star candidates this year:
    
    				OBP		SLG
    Player A			.347		.409
    Player B			.412		.422
    Player C                    .384		.498
    Player D			.378		.492
    Player E			.415		.448
    Player F			.438		.558
    Player G			.371		.442
    Player H			.333		.407
    Player I			.395		.421
    
    The players whose stats are listed are Boggs, Cirillo, Fryman, Naehring, 
    Seitzer, Sprague, Surhoff, Thome, and Ventura - not in that order.
    (Palmer had only 119 at bats last year; all those listed above played
    essentially regularly.)
    
    Thome's just having a hot 1st half, or so you say.  Care to guess
    which of the above lines belongs to him?
    
    I rarely have any desire to bet any significant amount of money, but
    I would be more than happy to wager that Thome ends his career with
    a higher OBP _and_ SLG than Cirillo.  If injuries hit neither, Thome
    will also have a large advantage in any counting category you'd care
    to mention save speed categories.
    
    Don't get me wrong - I'm not putting down Cirillo.  I think he's a
    decent player, and will be a good regular for a few years.  But
    Thome is head and shoulders above him.
    
    Joe
63.2533WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 01 1996 19:428
    
    
    
         Let me guess. Is Thome an F'er???
    
    
    
    Chap
63.2534ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 01 1996 19:4320
    
    George, since you enjoy runs created...
    
    Park adjusted, runs created per 26 outs (as of 6/9 - sorry, I couldn't
    find anything more recent):
    
    Naehring: 9.47
    Giambi: 8.38
    Surhoff: 8.24
    Ventura: 8.07
    Cirillo: 7.78
    Palmer: 7.29
    Sprague: 6.75
    Boggs: 6.72
    
    And Thome: 11.11
    
    More up-to-date stuff when I see it...
    
    Joe
63.2535Cather: Rodrigues,PiazzaMKOTS3::BREENMon Jul 01 1996 19:5912
    Here are the starters for the all star game:
    
    	American			National
    1b	Thomas				McGriff
    2b	Alomar				Biggio
    ss	Ripken				Larkin
    3b	Boggs ("Legendary")		Williams
    of	Lofton				Gwynn
    of	Griffey				Bonds
    of	Belle				Bichette
    
    Those aren't my quotes
63.2536CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 20:0513
  I'm not sure why you are still talking about the All Star game, my comments
on Cirillo had to do with who I would like to have on my team. I'd go with
Cirillo because I think that despite Thome's hot bat right now, Cirillo is
almost as good offensively and much better defensively. 

  As for the all-star game, as I said before Boggs should be on the team
because this is not the "best hitter" game or the "hottest spring" game but the
"all star" game. 

  I defy you to show me numbers of any sort that show Thome as more of a
star than Boggs.

  George
63.2537IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jul 01 1996 20:094
>  I defy you to show me numbers of any sort that show Thome as more of a
>star than Boggs.

Very brave, George.  Stand behind an flexible definition...
63.2538Does that count???WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 01 1996 20:143
    
    
        I like Thome More!
63.2539Cirillo is okay, but Thome is clearly the best of the bunchROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 01 1996 20:182
    
    If Chappy likes Thome better, I do too!
63.2540CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 20:2419
RE  <<< Note 63.2537 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "It's Baseball And You're An American" >>>

>Very brave, George.  Stand behind an flexible definition...

  I have no choice, it's the only definition. As I said, they don't call it the
"Best Hitter Game" or the "Hot Spring Game", it's the "All Star Game". 

  Boggs is a star. Thome and Cirillo may be stars some day but they are not
there yet. Tim Naehring was a star and got my vote because he hit a grand slam
the day I voted and made a spectacular play the inning I voted. For that moment
he was even a bigger star than Boggs, at least in front of the 27,000 fans with
which I was sharing the stadium. 

  "All Star Game". Vote for the biggest star.

  Offensive numbers? That's for Rotisserie and that's where Thome looks the
best. As for betting my future on a real 3b? That's where I like Cirillo.

  George
63.2541ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 01 1996 20:268
    
    Tim Naehring was a star, but Thome may be a star some day?  This pretty
    much sums up the entire situation.  READ MY WORDS - Naehring has
    *NEVER* been a better player than Thome.  
    
    Fack(tm) - if George had Thome on his rotis team, he'd like Thome best
    of all!
    
63.2542CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 20:3115
RE                     <<< Note 63.2541 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

>    Tim Naehring was a star, but Thome may be a star some day?  This pretty
>    much sums up the entire situation.  READ MY WORDS - Naehring has
>    *NEVER* been a better player than Thome.  

  Well there we disagree. I think they are pretty close and the fact that
Naehring is improving at defense at a new position means he'll pass Thome on
defense soon enough if he hasn't already. 

  But both pale by comparison to Boggs when you are picking a star who is
currently having a good enough season to be a contender. The chicken man is a
living legend.

  George
63.2543ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 01 1996 20:3425
    
>  Offensive numbers? That's for Rotisserie and that's where Thome looks the
>best. As for betting my future on a real 3b? That's where I like Cirillo.
    
    HR and BA and SB and RBI are rotisserie numbers, sure.
    
    OBP and SLG are what win ball games.
    
    BTW, Thome's current RC/game, using your formula, stands at 10.4.
    
    On what do you base your belief that Cirillo will be a better 3b
    than Thome?
    
    Thome:
    
    1) Clearly performs at a higher offensive level currently.
    
    2) Is younger, and therefore likely to grow more and decline more
       slowly.
    
    3) Is an above average third baseman; while not the best in the
       league, what indication there is suggests that if anything,
       Thome's the better defensive player of the two.
    
    Joe
63.2544ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 01 1996 20:3612
    
>  Well there we disagree. I think they are pretty close and the fact that
>Naehring is improving at defense at a new position means he'll pass Thome on
>defense soon enough if he hasn't already. 
    
    George,
    
    I've already granted that Naehring's a better defensive 3rd baseman
    than Thome.  Naehring would even be my pick as a backup to Thome at
    the all-* game.  But there's no way he's a bigger star than Thome...
    
    Joe
63.2545ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 01 1996 20:474
    
    No Joe, he said Naehring *IS* a star and that Thome may someday be a
    star!
    
63.2546CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 20:5528
RE       <<< Note 63.2543 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>    1) Clearly performs at a higher offensive level currently.

  ... in a power packed lineup. And yes the Brewers are starting to put up
some decent offensive numbers but the Indians hitting around Thome already
have the reputation that intimidates A.L. Pitching. No one goes into County
Stadium intimidated.
    
>    2) Is younger, and therefore likely to grow more and decline more
>       slowly.

  They are less than a year apart.
    
>    3) Is an above average third baseman; while not the best in the
>       league, what indication there is suggests that if anything,
>       Thome's the better defensive player of the two.
    
  As you know defense is almost impossible to measure. I'm just going on what
I've seen.

RE Thome is already a star.

  Thome is not a star. A really fine player yes but he's got a long way to
go before you would call him a star. In spite of being in the World Series
he's still relatively unknown.

  George
63.2547CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 01 1996 20:5610
Re                     <<< Note 63.2545 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

>   No Joe, he said Naehring *IS* a star and that Thome may someday be a
>    star!
    
  No, I didn't say that. I said that Naehring was a star on that one day
in front of that one crowd. I never claimed that Naehring was a star the
way Boggs is a star.

  George
63.2548AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Jul 02 1996 11:0116
    
    
      When I heard the most_popular_player game starters anounced yesterday
    I knew Thome would be the guy to get boned.  He is at least 2 levels
    above any 3B'man in the AL.  Dean Palmer is the closest and he's quite
    a ways back.  Naerhing is a good player, nothing great, I certianly
    would not rank him with Thome, Palmer, Ventura and Fryman.  Thome got
    boned plain and simple.  Its not the first time a deserving starter has
    gotton bumped for a "name" and this won't be the last.  Vaughn should
    be the AL starter for 1B but Thomas and Vaughn are the two best in the
    leauge and if Hargrove dosen't name Vaughn it'll be sour grapes.  Mo is
    the only Red Sox player that should even be allowed to watch the game
    let alone play in it.  Well thats a bit harsh Clemens has pitched well
    with no support.
    
    Jerry
63.2549ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 02 1996 12:1922
    
    George,
    
    I know you've read Bill James.  And his study showed the same thing
    that every study has: protection doesn't exist.  Protection in the
    lineup cuts down on intentional walks, but has no significant effect
    upon non-IBB at bats.
    
    What prompted James, as you may recall, was the comments made by an
    announcer w.r.t. Bob Horner hitting behind Dale Murphy.  When Horner
    left Atlanta, it was predicted that Murphy's numbers would suffer.
    They didn't.
    
    The same type of event has happened many times in baseball, and the
    result has almost always been the same - no significant effect.
    
    The lineup around Thome _does_ have an effect upon his RS and RBI
    totals.  But OBP and SLG are mostly independent; there is no reason
    whatsoever to believe that if they switched places, Cirillo would
    suddenly look like the better hitter (or even come close).
    
    Joe
63.2550CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jul 02 1996 12:4220
  If Bill James has one weakness it is that he gets a little sloppy with
statistical analysis. His Runs Created really holds up well but if he really
drew that conclusion from the example you discussed then this analysis is
flawed. 

  First, just looking at one guy over 2 season is too small a sample size.
Beyond that this is a very hard thing to measure since there can be a number
of factors that cause someone's offensive stats to change from year to year.

  With Runs Created he's looking at hundreds of major league players per year
generating thousands of runs and the statistics he's looking at for performance
and runs are drawn from the same set of games. Looking at 1 guy over 2 seasons
with the two sets of numbers drawn from the 2 different seasons doesn't say
much of anything at all.

  For example, Kirby Pucket's numbers have dropped off dramatically this year.
Should we ignore his eye problems and use that to counter the arguments for a
juiced ball?

  George
63.2551ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 02 1996 13:056
    
    I get it George, you agree will Bill James when he supports your side,
    but you disagree when his analysis supports the other side.  
    
    Give it up, Cirillo is an *OKAY* 3b, Thome is by far the cream of the 
    crop.
63.2552ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 02 1996 13:2738
    
    Jerry,
    
>      When I heard the most_popular_player game starters anounced yesterday
>    I knew Thome would be the guy to get boned.
    
    No big deal.  Having the public choose the starters isn't a bad thing,
    so long as people keep in mind that they aren't necessarily the best
    players.
    
>   He is at least 2 levels above any 3B'man in the AL.  Dean Palmer is 
>   the closest and he's quite a ways back.
    
    I'm not absolutely certain Palmer's closest, though he may well be.
    
>    Naerhing is a good player, nothing great, I certianly
>    would not rank him with Thome, Palmer, Ventura and Fryman.  
    
    Um - while I wouldn't rank him with Thome, he certainly does rank
    with Palmer, Ventura, and Fryman.  He's clearly having the second
    best year of any AL third baseman.
    
>    Vaughn should
>    be the AL starter for 1B but Thomas and Vaughn are the two best in the
>    leauge and if Hargrove dosen't name Vaughn it'll be sour grapes.  
    
    True, though you _have_ to take McGwire as well - other than health,
    his numbers have been comparable, and in the toughest park to hit in
    in the AL...
    
>    Mo is
>    the only Red Sox player that should even be allowed to watch the game
>    let alone play in it.
    
    Naehring wouldn't be undeserving as the third third baseman, and
    Stanley would be an excellent choice.
    
    Joe
63.2553ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 02 1996 13:299
    
    George,
    
    James _didn't_ look at one guy over 2 seasons.  That was what _started_
    the whole thing, but it certainly didn't end there.
    
    James looked at _hundreds_ of players over two seasons.
    
    Joe
63.2554CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jul 02 1996 13:3013
RE                     <<< Note 63.2551 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

>    I get it George, you agree will Bill James when he supports your side,
>    but you disagree when his analysis supports the other side.  
    
  No, I agree with Bill James when he makes sense and I disagree with him
when he doesn't.

  Looking at what I actually said can you see any reason why I'm not correct
in saying that Runs Created holds up while the one time analysis of Dale
Murphy does not? Or are you just busting my chops?

  George
63.2555CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jul 02 1996 13:3414
RE       <<< Note 63.2553 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>    James looked at _hundreds_ of players over two seasons.
    
  Well that's better but I still don't like the idea that for each player he's
comparing stats from different seasons. As I said with Runs Created for each
case he's looking at the individual production numbers and runs scored from
the same season.

  What this relies on is that careers coming and going, medical problems,
fences moving in and out, new stadiums, other hot players replacing the guy
who left and all the other variables from season all have to average out.

  George
63.2556SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jul 02 1996 14:037
    
    	During last nights Sox/Yankees game they put up all the stats of
    the 6 top 3B in the AL, They only showed Average, Hr's, and RBI. Tim
    Naehring was 3rd in each category. Thome was 1st in Hr's and Rbi's and
    4th in average.
    
    Ron
63.2557MKOTS3::BREENTue Jul 02 1996 14:2513
    Horner absolutely "made" Murphy and it wasn't long after Horner's
    departure for various reasons that Murphy and the Braves went into
    their long decline.  Horner was a professional hitter totally dangerous
    but subject to injury and weight problems.
    
    I can't give dates specifically but Murphy did go into a decline after
    Horner left.  Stats are all you have if you can't get to the games or
    at least watch on tv; they even can help balance what you do see but
    baseball isn't really played that way.
    
    The nightmare is that Dan Duquette is paying attention to these modern
    stat-masters except according to Joe, Alicea and Tinsley showed up well
    in the stats.
63.2558ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 02 1996 14:5926
    
>    Horner absolutely "made" Murphy and it wasn't long after Horner's
>    departure for various reasons that Murphy and the Braves went into
>    their long decline.
    
    Murphy declined because he started to get _old_, not because Horner
    was gone.  His first year after Horner left was every bit as good
    at his last when Horner was there - and even while Horner was there,
    Murphy's performance was equally good with and without Horner in
    the lineup.
    
>    I can't give dates specifically but Murphy did go into a decline after
>    Horner left.  Stats are all you have if you can't get to the games or
>    at least watch on tv; they even can help balance what you do see but
>    baseball isn't really played that way.
    
    Stats give an excellent (albeit not complete) picture of offensive
    and pitching performances.  Statistics aren't how the game _is_
    played, but they give an excellent description of how a game _was_
    played.
    
    The same people who downplay the use of statistics in viewing
    baseball are usually those who will tell you Andre Dawson deserved
    the 1987 MVP because he hit 49 HR.
    
    Joe
63.2559ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 02 1996 15:047
    
    Reportedly, Grover is considering taking Vizquel over ARod for
    the all-star game.
    
    Yuck, yuck, yuck.  I most sincerely hope the rumor is false.
    
    Joe
63.2560:-)ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 02 1996 15:052
    
    Vizquel is better defensively!
63.2561ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 02 1996 15:064
    
    Maybe.  I'd still take Rodriguez in a heartbeat.
    
    Joe
63.2562MKOTS3::BREENTue Jul 02 1996 15:0610
    So Joe, did your stat allow you to predict the Redsox collapse with the
    replacement of the centerfielder and second baseman with two total
    stiffs?  Granted, Cordero being off the chart couldn't have a
    statistical base and perhaps Hosey's sample was small.
    
    But to have validity these stats have to allow you to make predictions
    and the above was a perfect opportunity.  I will make you a prediction:
    The Whitesox will beat out the Indians for first place in the Central.
    Lofton is the key and if comes back from the break playing the way he
    can perhaps I'll be wrong.  
63.2563ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 02 1996 15:092
    
    Vizquel has WS experience.
63.2564SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jul 02 1996 15:209
    
    	Hargrove would have to be an idiot to pick Vizquel. Omar has
    a problem with his throwing shoulder, he will probably have off
    season surgery, Give him the time off.
    	Either that or Hargrove will name all of his injured players to
    the team. So they can get there 50K bonuses, then have them decline
    because of injury.
    
    Ron
63.2565ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 02 1996 15:247
    
    Maybe Hargrove will name him, he'll get the 50K bonus and then replace
    him or not play him...  no too dumb, huh!  Same game all the other
    managers play.
    
    He better name Thome, and Nagy should be the starting pitcher.
    
63.2566ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 02 1996 15:3561
    
>    So Joe, did your stat allow you to predict the Redsox collapse with the
>    replacement of the centerfielder and second baseman with two total
>    stiffs?
    
    No; stats are _somewhat_ useful for predictions, but not when it
    comes to pitching - wherein lies the Sox collapse.
    
>    Granted, Cordero being off the chart couldn't have a
>    statistical base and perhaps Hosey's sample was small.
 
    Actually, Hosey's sample size wasn't _that_ small; however, his
    performance this year _is_ a small sample size.  The fact that
    Hosey, at his peak, was a borderline major league player should
    have been a hint - and _was_, as Duquette had back up plans in place.
       
>    But to have validity these stats have to allow you to make predictions
>    and the above was a perfect opportunity.
    
    That is absolutely _not_ the case.  Statistics can be valid independent
    of their ability to predict future events.
    
    Pitching statistics (particularly ERA, but also H/9, BB/9, K/9, extra
    base hits allowed, and so on) provide an excellent picture of what
    has happened.  But the standard deviation on pitching stats is very
    large (as long term statistical analysis has shown); therefore, they
    aren't terribly useful in predictions.
    
    Hitting stats have a much smaller standard deviation, and therefore
    are of much more use in making predictions.  There still is some
    variation, and the league-wide variables are hard to predict.  But
    you can, given a player's recent performances and age, make a
    reasonable guess as to what they will do.
    
>    I will make you a prediction:
>    The Whitesox will beat out the Indians for first place in the Central.
    
    It could happen - my concern about Chicago isn't a big secret...
    
>    Lofton is the key and if comes back from the break playing the way he
>    can perhaps I'll be wrong.  
    
    Actually, Lofton's not the major problem as I see it.  The major
    problems are:
    
    1) Baerga.  He's having a _really_ bad year; Grover got hit out of
       the three slot for a while, but needs to keep him out until he
       starts hitting.
    
    2) Franco.  His performance has been great; his health is a question.
    
    3) Murray.  He's been playing almost as poorly as Baerga.
    
    4) Martinez.  Again, health questions.
    
    5) McDowell.  And again.
    
    There are many possibly solutions for most of these problems - but
    _not_ for Baerga.
    
    Joe
63.2567ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jul 03 1996 12:3835
    
    _Now_ Thome's been robbed, and by his own manager, even.
    
    My all-star picks (w/ the same requirements Hargrove had to work
    with)
    
    Starters:
    
    C: Ivan Rodriguez
    1B: Frank Thomas
    2B: Roberto Alomar
    SS: Cal Ripken
    3B: Wade Boggs
    LF: Albert Belle
    CF: Kenny Lofton
    RF: Ken Griffey
    
    Reserves:
    
    C: Dan Wilson (if I really wanted a third catcher, Steinbach or Stanley
                   would be a better pick than Alomar)
    1B: Mo Vaughn, Mark McGwire (Palmiero, while a good player, is _not_
                                 an omission)
    2B: Chuck Knoblauch, Mark Lewis (a better pick from Detroit than
                                     Fryman)
    SS: Alex Rodriguez
    3B: Edgar Martinez, Jim Thome
    OF: Brady Anderson, Tim Salmon, Greg Vaughn (Bernie Williams as the
                                                 replacement for Griffey)
    
    SP: Charles Nagy (starter), Juan Guzman, Kevin Appier, Alex Fernandez,
        Andy Pettitte, Roger Clemens
    RP: John Wetteland, Roberto Hernandez, Troy Percival 
    
    Joe
63.2568:-(WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jul 03 1996 13:096
    
    
    
          Bernie was Robbed, Jobbed, and Knobbed!!
    
    Joe Carter...Jeez
63.2569ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jul 03 1996 13:144
    
    While Bernie has a case, he wasn't as badly robbed as Thome...
    
    Joe
63.2571bad boys?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Jul 03 1996 14:57120
   
   ESPNET SportsZone | Major League Baseball
   
                 BAD BOYS OF BASEBALL? INDIANS AMUSED BY LABEL
                                       
   From ESPN SportsCenter
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   Being very good, while being very bad.
   
   It's a delicate balance few franchises have ever pulled off: The
   Oakland Raiders ... The Detroit Pistons ... The Cleveland Indians?
   
   While the Indians don't yet have the championship rings to live up to
   this select company, they do have the headlines, suspensions and
   downright surliness to live down to it. However, unlike the Pistons
   or Raiders, it's a reputation that the team might not be so willing
   to embrace.
   
   Mike Hargrove Hargrove
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   "I think the perception of the majority of people that follow
   baseball, even the people that don't follow baseball, is that this
   ballclub has a bunch of bad actors and a bunch of bad guys," Cleveland
   manager Mike Hargrove said.
   
   Dan O'Dowd, Cleveland's director of baseball operations, said the
   Indians are caught trying to walk a very fine line. "We've got a lot
   of confidence. We've got a lot of swagger, and we play the game hard,
   and we play the game the right way," he said. "But unfortunately, I
   think we're hated, and we're feared at the same time."
   
   Cleveland center fielder [IMAGE] Kenny Lofton said the image is
   unwarranted.
   
   [IMAGE] Kenny Lofton says Cleveland's bad image is a bad rap.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   "They're calling the Indians 'the Bad Boys?' " he said with a hint of
   disdain. "I mean, you have one bad apple, and now your whole situation
   is going wrong? We have one incident here or there, and now our whole
   team and our whole situation is considered bad."
   
   In modern sports, it has become trendy to root for the renegade; none
   wore the black hat any prouder than the Raiders, and not so
   coincidentally, no team outsold them in terms of merchandising. And
   love them or hate them, the Indians have become the biggest attraction
   in baseball.
   
   You can't buy a ticket at Jacobs Field, where the Indians average
   almost 43,000 per game. Moreover, they are almost as big a draw on the
   road, where they are leading the American League in average road
   attendance.
   
   "Five years ago, it was the exact reverse of that," Hargrove said.
   "You know, you could get a ticket to an Indians game just about
   anytime or anywhere you wanted. And we've become a draw whether people
   want to come and boo us or come cheer for us."
   
   Carlos Baerga Baerga
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   Cleveland second baseman [IMAGE] Carlos Baerga welcomes the change. "I
   remember when we used to be in last place all the time. Every time
   we'd go to Toronto or to Oakland, it was nice to see their ballpark
   packed all the time, and the people would follow their team anywhere
   they'd go, and now it's the Cleveland Indians."
   
   While American League pitchers have been trying to figure out how to
   silence the big bats of the Indians, Cleveland's front office staff
   has been brainstorming almost as hard trying to figure out how to get
   some of the player who carry those big bats to speak up. [IMAGE]
   Albert Belle and [IMAGE] Eddie Murray, in particular, refuse to talk
   with the press.
   
   "Five minutes a day would cure a lot of ills, as far as talking with
   the media and probably deflecting a lot of the criticism that comes
   the Indians' way," Hargrove said.
   
   O'Dowd said club officials talked to the players, but he added that
   they don't want to press the issue too much.
   
   Added Hargrove, "Personally, I think (the players) should talk, but
   that really enters into the area of 'none of my business.' "
   
   Albert Belle Some say Albert Belle's bad-boy image is creating an
   unfair perception of all the Indians.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   If fans and reporters could make a movie about the Indians, fairly or
   unfairly, Belle would certainly be cast in the villain's role.
   
   "I don't know that I really understand Albert totally. I don't think
   anybody does," Hargrove said. "I think people understand as much about
   Albert as he'll allow them to understand."
   
   And apparently that doesn't work in Belle's favor.
   
   "They look at Albert as a bad guy, but he's not a bad guy," Lofton
   said. "He's a very intense guy that shows his emotions more than
   others, but you get other guys on other teams that show their emotions
   just as well as he does, and nothing happens to them."
   
   If Belle the individual is being singled out, could the Tribe as a
   team be targeted too?
   
   "Maybe it's because they know we're good," Baerga mused. "Every time
   we go on the field, we always think we're going to win. That's the
   feeling we have."
   
   And it's a feeling that gets stronger as the team gets better.
   
   "'Me against the world' and that's what we feel like, it's us against
   everyone else," Lofton said with more than a hint of pride. "And we
   feel like we're in that position right now (since) everyone's against
   us."
   
   
     _________________________________________________________________
63.2572AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherWed Jul 03 1996 17:147
    
    
       Glenn, when healthy Naerhing is a nice player.  Never said he wasn't.
    I just don't think he's the great all-star next comming of Mike Schmidt
    that most Red Sox fans seem to think he is.  
    
    Jerry
63.2573can't wait to hear this one...POWDML::GARBARINOWed Jul 03 1996 20:3215
>      I'd hardly equate a beer shower with pelting someone with 
>     batteries, bats and baseballs and other items thrown with
>     the expressed intent of doing physical damage but then I'm 
>     not a Yankees 'fan' so such distinctions don't escape me. Joe, 
>     at least three or four times a year you have to come in here 
>     and make lame excuses for the neanderthal behavior of the losers 
>     who populate the stands at Yankee Stadium. I'd think you'd have
>     grown tired of it by now and would just fess up that they're
>     scumbags.


Tommy, I'm dying to hear your spin on the woman just arrested in
Cincinnati for planning to bomb Barry Larkin with a Molotov cocktail ?

She's probably originally from NY, right ?
63.2574For the recordMUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldFri Jul 05 1996 13:3013
>> >Well, I had occasion to look it up a couple of weeks ago, and my recollection
>> >is that Jacobs Field is very much a home run park, which of course is a
>> >significant portion of Thome's imposing slugging percentage. 

>> For 1995, Jacobs Field was almost an *exactly* average home run park.

In fact, since it was opened it has been an almost perfectly neutral park.
I looked it up when I got home Monday night, saw that my memory had failed
me again, and shook a couple dozen dead brain cells out of my left ear.

I might have mixed it up with Camden Yard.

Steve
63.2575ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 08 1996 12:5138
    
    For George:
    
    RC totals, along with park adjusted totals.  I'm not really certain
    what the "value" field is, to be honest.  Totals through 7/3.
    
				RC/27	PRC/27	Value
Jim Thome, Cleveland		11.02	10.41	39.3	(big snub)
Jason Giambi, Oakland		8.05	8.30	31.9	(another one)
Matt Williams, San Francisco	7.57	7.92	29.7
Robin Ventura, Chicago-A	7.27	7.90	29.1
Tim Naehring, Boston		8.31	7.72	19.9
Dean Palmer, Texas		7.66	7.69	26.6
Jeff Cirillo, Milwaukee		7.58	7.55	22.2
Ed Sprague, Toronto		7.80	7.26	23.6
Wade Boggs, New York-A		7.04	7.17	20.2
Chipper Jones, Atlanta		7.36	7.03	22.5
B. J. Surhoff, Baltimore	6.48	6.73	16.7
Keith Lockhart, Kansas City	6.67	6.70	14.4
Ken Caminiti, San Diego		6.11	6.67	16.8
Leo Gomez, Chicago-N		6.62	6.31	11.7
AVERAGE REGULAR 3B		6.22
Shane Andrews, Montreal		6.27	5.79	8.2
Jeff Kent, New York-N		5.05	5.67	10.5
Sean Berry, Houston		5.44	5.62	9.1
Todd Zeile, Philadelphia	5.26	5.49	9.6
Mike Blowers, Los Angeles	4.94	5.35	7.6
Vinny Castilla, Colorado	7.17	5.34	8.1
Travis Fryman, Detroit		5.23	5.23	7.4	(VERY undeserving)
Dave Hollins, Minnesota		5.33	4.82	3.3
Russ Davis, Seattle		4.27	4.56	0.8
Tim Wallach, California		4.61	4.52	0.6
REPLACEMENT LEVEL?		4.40
Jeff Branson, Cincinnati	4.10	4.35	-0.2
Charlie Hayes, Pittsburgh	4.33	4.15	-2.1
Gary Gaetti, St. Louis		4.05	4.04	-2.6
Terry Pendleton, Florida	3.56	3.77	-5.3
                                                                 
63.2577ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 08 1996 13:0110
    
    As reported in the Cleveland Plain Dealer (Sunday, July 7th):
    
    "Roger Clemens told his agent that he wouldn't mind getting traded to
    the Indians in the second half."
    
    Looks like Clemens wants out of losersville, USA now... probably has
    nothing to do with the team though - he probably just doesn't like 
    the New England attitude, the drivers and the chowder, and he wants to
    move back to his birth state.
63.2578CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 08 1996 13:0225
RE       <<< Note 63.2575 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>

>    For George:
>    
>    RC totals, along with park adjusted totals.  I'm not really certain
>    what the "value" field is, to be honest.  Totals through 7/3.
>    

  For Joe:

  You keep making the assumption that "Given that the all-star team should be
the regular players who had the best offensive stats during the 1st half of the
season ..." 

  You are in good company, most baseball fans seem to feel that way but I
disagree. It's not the "Hot 1st half game", it's the "All-star game". Granted
who ever is elected should still be putting up decent numbers but having a
good 1st half doesn't make you a star since most people don't even start
thinking about baseball until after the all-star break. 

  Wade Boggs is a star who is still putting up decent numbers. The rest of the
A.L. guys on that list, while racking up some pretty impressive totals, are not
stars. They are not even close to being stars.

  George
63.2579CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 08 1996 13:0412
RE                     <<< Note 63.2577 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

    
>    As reported in the Cleveland Plain Dealer (Sunday, July 7th):
>
>    "Roger Clemens told his agent that he wouldn't mind getting traded to
>    the Indians in the second half."

  Now there's a source if I ever saw one. No question Roger Clemens would
confide in the Cleveland Plain Dealer before he talked to anyone else.

  George
63.2580ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 08 1996 13:3926
    
>  You keep making the assumption that "Given that the all-star team should be
>the regular players who had the best offensive stats during the 1st half of the
>season ..." 
    
    1) Where did I _ever_ mention the all star game?
    
    (Oops - I see the confusion.  The comments about the ASG were included
     in the original post - I neglected to clip them.  My intent was to
     post the data for the sake of comparing third basemen, _not_ for
     the sake of arguing about the ASG.)
    
    2) It is _not_ my contention, opinion, or belief that the ASG
       participants should be based upon 1st half performance only.
    
    How _I_ believe ASG participants should be chosen is as follows:
    
    Starters - by fan vote.  Give the fans who they want.
    
    Reserves - by performance.  1st half performance weighs most
               heavily, but should be closely followed by performance
               in the second half of the previous season.  Performances
               before that should be given some weight, decreasing
               with age.
    
    Joe
63.2581CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 08 1996 15:074
  Don't forget the part about how the coach is required to include at least
one player from each team.

  George
63.2582ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 08 1996 15:368
    
    Why?  I was saying how I feel it _should_ be done, not how it _is_
    done.
    
    I gave my all-* picks, using the same restrictions Hargrove had,
    previously in here...
    
    Joe
63.2583SNAX::ERICKSONWed Jul 10 1996 13:176
    
    	How did Albert "K" Belle do in the All-Star game last night?
    
    :^)
    
    Ron
63.2584POWDML::GARBARINOWed Jul 10 1996 13:214
>Is Rivera the latest "next Mickey Mantle"?

Jay Buhner was the "next _insert_Yankee_great_" awhile back, and it looks
like the hype was right.
63.2585except that he's not a Yankee you mean?SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townWed Jul 10 1996 13:251
63.2586ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jul 10 1996 14:044
    
    
    Can anyone tell me whether Rogers Clemens winning percentage this year
    is better or worse than the Red Sox's team winning percentage?
63.2587WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jul 10 1996 14:113
    
    
       I believe its a little worse.
63.2588SNAX::ERICKSONWed Jul 10 1996 14:3612
    
    	Clemens, winning % is lower then the Sox winning percentage. The
    Sox have scored 2 or fewer runs in 9 of Roger's 19 starts. Plus,
    the bullpen has blown 6 wins. If Roger were on the Indians and
    received the 5+ runs a game that Nagy gets, Roger would be the leading
    candidate for Cy Young.
    
    	Which player is currently batting under .300, Mo Vaughh or
    Albert "K" Belle?
    
    
    Ron
63.2589WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jul 10 1996 14:464
    
    
    
       Nice range my Mo last night on first.
63.2590MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Wed Jul 10 1996 14:4710
    
      Judging from Indians losing the World Series last year
     and stinking out the all-star game this year, one would
     have to conclude that years of playing in an essentially
     empty stadium have rendered the Indians incapable of playing
     in front of large crowds when the pressure is on. For the 
     good of the team come playoff time this year, Indians "fans 
     might want to consider doing what they did for years - ignore 
     the Indians and stay the hell away from the ballpark. It may
     be the only way they can win it all.
63.2591WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jul 10 1996 14:5012
    
    
    
    
       I wouldn't say the Indians stunk out the joint. Lofton had 2 Stolen
    bases. 1 hit and a walk. Albert made a nice stop on that ball to left
    center last night. Savinf an inside the park HR.
    
    
    
    
    Chap
63.2592IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanWed Jul 10 1996 15:1811
>       I wouldn't say the Indians stunk out the joint. Lofton had 2 Stolen
>    bases. 1 hit and a walk. Albert made a nice stop on that ball to left
>    center last night.

Agreed.  Albert didn't have a good night at the plate, but Kenny Lofton showed
why he's the *real* "Prime Time".

>Savinf an inside the park HR.

Maybe a bit of an overstatement.  The guy playing next to Albert in the 
outfield can run a little and has a good arm.
63.2593AWECIM::RUSSOclaimin!Wed Jul 10 1996 15:2810
    
    Belle seems to be in a slump, his offensive output has been down lately
    if I recall correctly.  He didn't look very comfortable or confident at
    the plate last night.
    
    Bob Costas is a boob.  I don't think there is any need for him plead
    with Albert Belle to "get help" while broadcasting the game.  As far as
    I'm concerned, Costas abused his position (again).
    
    Dave
63.2594AWECIM::RUSSOclaimin!Wed Jul 10 1996 15:295
    
    
    Oh, and Mo certainly typified the Red Sox defense last night.....
    
    
63.2595MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Wed Jul 10 1996 15:448
    
      >Savinf an inside the park HR.

       Albert made a decent play but it seemed like Costas & co.
       went out of their way to say something positive about him
       after basically branding him a nut case. It was little more 
       than a routine play.
    
63.2596nice job...NOT !POWDML::GARBARINOWed Jul 10 1996 16:534
How come Hargrove didn't get Greg Vaughn in the game last night ?
And did anyone else read Gammons' article claiming Bernie Williams
to be an MVP candidate and inexplicably being ignored by The_Human_
Rain_Delay for the A-S roster ?
63.2597POWDML::GARBARINOWed Jul 10 1996 16:5514
>WAKE UP Chappy. That "next Mantle" tag has been pinned on no less 
>than 3 NY rookies over the past few years with Buhner being the 
>other one that immediately comes to mind.

BZZZZZTTTTT !!!  Wrong.  Which rookies have been called such, and
by whom ?  And Buhner was being compared to Dimaggio, not Mantle.


>Meanwhile, just how many things were tossed/beers poured over 
>Joey in Fenway the past couple days?

>Tell us again how fans are the same everywhere...

Cincinnati woman makes bomb for Larkin ???
63.2598So says espn Radio last night.WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jul 10 1996 17:097
    
    
    
         Greg Vaughn had an upset stomach so he requested not to play.
    
    
    Chap
63.2599IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanWed Jul 10 1996 17:164
>         Greg Vaughn had an upset stomach so he requested not to play.

One of the disadvantages to having the All-Star game in Philadelphia
is the ready availability of cheesesteaks...
63.2600gotsta be a_excuseHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Jul 10 1996 17:211
... and the lack of availability of designated hitters
63.2601ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jul 10 1996 17:5332
    
>How come Hargrove didn't get Greg Vaughn in the game last night ?
>And did anyone else read Gammons' article claiming Bernie Williams
>to be an MVP candidate and inexplicably being ignored by The_Human_
>Rain_Delay for the A-S roster ?
    
    I disagreed with Grover's selections as well (you can see my picks
    earlier in this string), but his picks _were_ consistent with a
    (incorrect IMHO) belief - that wins are the mark of good pitching,
    not ERA.
    
    If you believe that, then Williams _can't_ be on the roster. 
    Since this theology devalues Guzman, Joe Carter become the best
    candidate for Toronto.  Vaughn is Milwaukee's representative.
    You can argue that (and I would argue that) Williams is more
    deserving than Buhner; so is Tim Salmon, however.
    
    But Williams still is not the most deserving AL player who didn't
    go; Grover let his own best player stay in Cleveland.
    
    As for MVP candidates, at this point my ballot would go:
    
    Mark McGwire
    Jim Thome
    Chuck Knoblauch
    Edgar Martinez
    Brady Anderson
    Mo Vaughn
    Frank Thomas
    Bernie Williams
    Tim Salmon
    Juan Gonzalez
63.2602ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Jul 10 1996 18:1815
    
    Oops - I missed somebody.
    
    Make that:
    
    Mark McGwire
    Jim Thome
    Chuck Knoblauch
    Edgar Martinez
    Brady Anderson
    Alex Rodriguez
    Mo Vaughn
    Frank Thomas
    Bernie Williams
    Tim Salmon
63.2603Belle saves his failures for the national stage...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Jul 10 1996 19:0111
                   
    As usual, Bob Uecker provided passable comic relief to an otherwise
    dreary affair... the AL was fast asleep for most of this one.  I 
    think it's clear that Albert's behavior just places additional 
    pressure on himself to "show everyone" when it might be easier to
    crack a smile once every other season or so.  But he'll do it his
    way, which only makes it tolerable to see him go down the crapper
    whenever the heat is on...
    
    glenn
    
63.2604IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanWed Jul 10 1996 19:239
>    As usual, Bob Uecker provided passable comic relief to an otherwise
>    dreary affair... 

(during a hitting streak discussion)

Costas:  "Bob, what was your longest streak?"

Uecker:  "Yellow."
 
63.2605PECAD8::CHILDSWed Jul 10 1996 19:267
And Costas intro was priceles "of the two gentlemen with me tonight one was
a 10 time all-star and 2 time mvp and the other is simply Mr. Baseball"

Major League > Bull Durham and CaddyShack > any other Sports' movie...

mike
63.2606MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Wed Jul 10 1996 19:424
    
      Uecker's self-deprecating brand of humor was old and tired about
     seven years ago. He should have been put out to pasture with the
     "Where's the beef?" lady a long time ago.
63.2607IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanWed Jul 10 1996 19:5628
>      Uecker's self-deprecating brand of humor was old and tired about
>     seven years ago. He should have been put out to pasture with the
>     "Where's the beef?" lady a long time ago.

Obviously, a lot of people disagree with you.  However, if this wasn't the
case, you'd be uncomfortable... :-)

I like listening to Uecker because he's very good at explaining baseball
through the eyes of the fringe player, who knew what it was like to have
to work at everything and exploit every advantage.  (He seemed to get a
special kick out of Ozzie Smith trying to keep a runner occupied just before
a pickoff move to second.)  I particularly like listening to him as he tries 
to describe what is going through a catcher's mind as a batter is being pitched
to.  I can see how the humor could wear thin, but that's not all of what he's
about.

I like listening to Morgan because:
	1) the guy has tremendous credentials ("Joe can't do Sunday Night
	     Baseball tonight because he's being inducted into the Hall of
	     Fame.")
	2) he's able to express his knowledge in a way that's clear to the
	     average fan
	3) unlike most of the talking heads that broadcast baseball, he's
	     actually not afraid to voice an opinion.  He also does so
	     without seeming condescending or confrontational.

Costas can be melodramatic at times, but I was pretty happy to hear that
Morgan and Uecker would be on the broadcast crew with him.  A nice mix.
63.2608MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Wed Jul 10 1996 20:4722
   >> I can see how the humor could wear thin, but that's not all 
   >> of what he's about.

      He'd be just fine without it but I think Costas gets a kick
      out of playing the straight man.

   >> I like listening to Morgan because:

      Next to Joe LaHoud, Morgan was my favorite player as a kid
      and I like him just as much as an announcer. He knows the game
      well and breaks it down so even casual fans like myself can
      understand the thought processes behind what's going on.

   >> Costas can be melodramatic at times, 

      Costas hasn't completely learned that dramatic moments require
      no embellishment. Between that and his aw shucks attitude, I'd
      rather shave my head with a belt sander then listen to him for
      nine whole innings.
  
    
63.2609POWDML::GARBARINOThu Jul 11 1996 13:032
I dislike Costas about as much as I dislike Scully.  Both think they're
as important as the game itself.
63.2610ya don't have to listen to 'emHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jul 11 1996 13:2712
I don't listen to 'em.

I don't know about y'all but my TV has this device where you can turn the
sound down and/or off.

Most contemporary announcers merit silence. In fack, you can actually
follow the sprots without 'em.

As for audio, I'll take a little John Hiatt, Green Day, Asleep at the
Wheel, or whatever.

TTom
63.2611Now fill out the rest of the teamMKOTS3::BREENThu Jul 11 1996 15:586
    >     Next to Joe LaHoud, Morgan was my favorite player as a kid
     
    Tommy, sometimes you absolutely leave me with aching ribs
    
    
    I kind of like Phil Plantier myself, tho
63.2612ROCK::GRONOWSKISun Jul 14 1996 02:376
    
    He's back... Albert rings the Belle for the third straight game.
    
    I hate to tell you front running White Sox fans this, but the 
    tribe is back into overdrive.  Heck, we're probably looking at
    a double digit lead by the end of the season.
63.2613:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 15 1996 13:147
    
    
    
        Double digit leads. Ah Yes.
    
    
    Chap
63.2614ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 15 1996 13:165
    
    If Thomas is out for any significant period of time, it's very
    possible.
    
    Joe
63.2615ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 15 1996 17:5513
    
    Especially now that Hargrove figured out what me and Joe have been
    saying for two years... THOME BATS THIRD, BELLE FOURTH AND RAMIREZ
    FIFTH.
    
    Other changes - Murray's PT is way done, Carreon and Burnitz are
    taking most of his PT.  BIG PLUS.
    
    Giles called up, a good bat off the bench - homered in his first
    at bat in the bigs - Can you name the last indian to do this?
    ANOTHER BIG PLUS.
    
    
63.2616ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 15 1996 18:336
    
    Chappy, since you're a Wins and Loss man... can you tell me who has a
    better winning percentage?
    
    Chad Ogea or Andy Pettitte?
    
63.2617WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 15 1996 18:398
    
    
       No I can't.  I try not to fantasize about players on inferior teams.
    All I know is that Pettitte is 14-4.
    
    
          But if your an expert on numbers. Who is the best team in the AL
    right now.
63.2618ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 15 1996 18:5914
    
    Pettitte is .778
    Ogea is .833
    
    Chappy is so confident that the Yankees will finish with a better
    record that he won't even make a wager.  Secondly, he was so convinced
    that Pettitte would be this good that:
    
    	a. He didn't draft him prior to the start of the season last
    	   year in the rotis league we are both in and 
    	b. He didn't pick him up with a replacement or free move for
    	   the first three weeks of the season when he was available
    
    (This is the same guy who traded Juan Gonzalez for Dan Gladden!)
63.2619WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 15 1996 19:2218
    
    
    
     Follow along this time Groaner.
    
       I am a gambler. Almost every weekend, Foxwoods or Poker or Hinsdale
    or Plainfield. But I like guys that I bet with to pay up on there bets.
    In other words I don't like welchers!
    
    
       On Pettitte..... I already had 5 Yankees on my team. I read a few
    places you should not have too many players from the same team on your
    roster.
    
       ON Gonzalez.... He was a rookie, I was a rookie et al.....
    
    
    Chap
63.2620You follow..WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 15 1996 19:247
    
    
    
    Welcher
    
    
    W   e    l    c      h    e        r???
63.2621ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 15 1996 19:255
    
    
    I paid up on our wager to the letter of the wager last year.  Just
    because you didn't clearly explain the wager is not my problem.
    
63.2622WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 15 1996 19:2711
    
    
    
    
    
       You can't even remember your own lies. It wasn't a wager with me. Care
    to try again.
                                       
    
    
        Chap
63.2623whatever it aint honorableHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jul 15 1996 19:2812
That's why the Las Vegas method of keeping track of bets is so worthwile.

They give you this little slip and it says exactly what the count and
amount is, which side you got and what the event is.

SPROTS betting has nothing to do with betting. Instead it's usually
a_exercise in deceit and chicanery. Hardly a tempting proposition, at
best.

Among the honorable, this rarely is a problem, however.

TTom
63.2624WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 15 1996 19:355
    
    
       Whenever I've lost. And I think I'm 3-3 in Sports. I have paid up to
    the letter of the law. Than again I'm an honorable person. Ask my
    bookie!
63.2625ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 15 1996 19:492
    
    I paid up to the letter of the law.
63.2626EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryMon Jul 15 1996 19:5415
    
> SPROTS betting has nothing to do with betting. Instead it's usually
> a_exercise in deceit and chicanery. Hardly a tempting proposition, at
> best.
> 
> Among the honorable, this rarely is a problem, however.
    
    And whither MrT?
    
    To his credit, on his deathbed, MrT did own up to damn near ever'
    bad thing he'd ever done, and even threw in the admission that 
    Big Bad John Elway is a stiff...
    
    glenn
    
63.2627WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 15 1996 19:588
    
    
    
       Groaner why do you delete all of your old replies in this topic?
    
    
    
    You are unbelievable.
63.2628ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 16 1996 03:095
    
    I think it was Barry Bonds who summed it up best to the press at the
    All-star festivities saying something like "you've got to congratulate
    Mo Vaughn for winning the MVP award in the AL last year, but everyone
    knows that Albert Belle was the MVP."       
63.2629remember 'em wellHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jul 16 1996 12:0714
>    And whither MrT?

Honorable, indeed.

It's my recollection that the initial perpetrator of the p-name waging
machinations was ol' BobHunt. He lost a bet that for the nexted couple of
weeks or so, all his notes from a given account would contain the p-name.

He merely noted from another account. For that and his unbelievable faux
pas calling Dean "G"reat and of course a body of work that still lives
on. I should check up on him and see if'n he went anywhere with that
sprots writing.

TTom
63.2630Does save time, of courseMUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldFri Jul 19 1996 13:139
.2627, Chap:
 
>       Groaner why do you delete all of your old replies in this topic?

You know, I wondered about that, too.  Reading in "catch-up mode", a week's
worth of notes at a sitting, it makes for peculiar continuity, like hearing
one side of a conversation.  Probably the better side.

Steve
63.2631ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 22 1996 02:133
    
    Tribe deals Murray to Baltimore for Mercker.  Good bye Eddie, don't let
    the door slap you in the behind on the way out.
63.2632with any luck Danny the Dunce will get a first rate prospectAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Jul 22 1996 10:066
    
    
      Guess this is the first of the left handed pitchers the tribe is
    gonna go get.  Moyer will be the next.
    
    Jerry
63.2633IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jul 22 1996 12:507
>    Tribe deals Murray to Baltimore for Mercker.  Good bye Eddie, don't let
>    the door slap you in the behind on the way out.

This doesn't do me a rat's behind worth of good - I own them both in my
Rotisserie league.

Luckily it's Ultra, and I have Mercker squirreled away on a reserve list...
63.2634TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jul 22 1996 13:3210
    
    Moyer's not worth a _third_ rate prospect, Jerry.
    
    And I must say - the only thing I was happy about when reading
    Gammon's column yesterday was the fact that he's usually wrong.
    The Indians do _not_ need a right handed third baseman - Thome's
    got a career .400 OBP vs. lefties (though his power _does_ go down -
    but still...).
    
    Joe
63.2635CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 22 1996 14:2014
  Mercker is really an enigma. After his no-hitter back in '94 there were
people seriously considering the possibility of him breaking into the Braves
starting rotation, probably the toughest place to land a pitching job in the
last few decades. However with Baltimore he's gone nowhere falling off last
year and racking up a 7+ ERA and giving up a home run every 5-6 innings so far
this season. 

  The question is, which Mercker will show up in Cleveland. He seems to be
on the decline and at best you'd have to say he's had little to no luck in
the American League.

  Maybe the tribe is looking to steal pitching signals during the World Series.

  George
63.2636WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 22 1996 14:3410
    
    
    Considering the possibility????
    
    
         Ah George. He was was your favorite teams 5th statrer last year.
    
    
    
    Chap
63.2638CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 22 1996 15:159
RE  <<< Note 63.2636 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>

>         Ah George. He was was your favorite teams 5th statrer last year.
    
  Yes, he was their 5th starter last year. In fact he had 26 starts compared
to 28 or 29 each for the top 4. His 7-8 was better than Avery's 7-13 which
got some people thinking that he might end up breaking into the top 4.

  George
63.2639Credit where dueMUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldMon Jul 22 1996 15:1612
Karen, for the benefit of those of us out of the reach of the Boston Globe,
could you be a little more specific?

Chap, I think what George meant is that the Braves were considering letting
Avery leave to free agency and handing the job to Mercker.  Only Avery's
late season resurgence and excellent postseason changed their minds.  Good
thing for them, too.

I expect Mercker to improve in Cleveland, if only because Camden Yard is
such a launching pad.

Steve
63.2640Probably see Moyer starting a post season game for somebodyMKOTS3::BREENMon Jul 22 1996 15:179
    Well what did it cost either team? I don't know whether Joe was
    stating an opinion or not but to get Moyer would cost the Indians
    something.  They may try Mercker a few times before the deadline and if he
    doesn't work out simply waive him.
    
    But to get Moyer will cost them a reasonable player or prospect since
    they'll have to bid against Texas.  Mercker may be able to pitch for
    the Indians there's something wrong in Baltimore, they haven't had a
    shutout all year. (?)
63.2641WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 22 1996 15:466
    
    
       Well Steve, what he said was starting rotation. I'm not Kenny Lofton
    you know I can't give or receive telepathic signals????
    
    Chap
63.2642AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Jul 22 1996 15:533
    
    
      I know that joe
63.2644KOD from a man who knows nuttin!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 22 1996 16:253
    
    
        Well There goes the season!!! :-(
63.2645CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 22 1996 16:2711
RE  <<< Note 63.2641 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>

>       Well Steve, what he said was starting rotation. I'm not Kenny Lofton
>    you know I can't give or receive telepathic signals????
    
  Ok, I see what you mean. Yes technically the 5th starter is part of the
starting rotation but when most people think of the Braves starters they think
of the 4 big names and for a while last year it looked as if a case could be
made for replacing Avery with Mercker.

  George
63.2646WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 22 1996 16:374
    
    
    
          Define Most People.
63.2647IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jul 22 1996 16:463
Oh no - the great "Most People" debate!

We're going to need a separate "definitions" note.
63.2648CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 22 1996 16:5725
RE  <<< Note 63.2646 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>

>          Define Most People.

  bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
 bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
    bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
   bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
  bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
 bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
    bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
   bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
  bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
 bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
    bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 
   bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ 

  *** SWAT ***

  ....

  George
63.2649Ok Then...WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 22 1996 17:003
    
    
    Define Most Bees??
63.2650CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 22 1996 18:108
RE  <<< Note 63.2649 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>

    
>    Define Most Bees??

  Well there's "B", "b", be, ... bee, ... Bea, ..., ... what else?

  George
63.2651WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 22 1996 18:288
    
    
    
    Thats you George. Change it to some useless mumbo Jumbo when your
    wrong.
    
    
    Chap
63.2652CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 22 1996 19:1025
  Right Chap. I should admit I'm wrong, sorry about that.

  As anyone can tell I was really off the mark. When ever anyone thinks of the
Braves Starting rotation the name of Kent Mercker jumps forth along with the
names of Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz and Avery. Why you hear about'em every day.
His name is burned into the memory of every kid south of the Mason Dixon line
and as we speak a bronze likeness of Mercker is being built to stand along side
the main entrance of the new Olympic Stadium. Ali himself imitated Mercker's
stance as he lit the Olympic torch and the key they gave Ali to the city is
only temporary, the real one being cast in gold to be presented to Kent Mercker
himself on the day inducted into the hall of fame.

  For centuries to come everyone who even thinks of baseball as it was at the
end of the 20th century will automatically mouth the sounds, Maddux, Glavine,
Smoltz, Avery and Mercker and never again will anyone refer to the Braves
"starting four" who dominated hitters at Fulton County Stadium. For ever more
it will be the Starting Five and Mercker's name will live in immortality along
with the other great athletes who visited Atlanta.

  Mathews ... Aaron ... Horner ... Murphy ... Maddux ... Kent Mercker ... 

                      the Pretzel Boy!!!!!

  George
63.2653IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jul 22 1996 19:439
>  As anyone can tell I was really off the mark. When ever anyone thinks of the
>Braves Starting rotation the name of Kent Mercker jumps forth along with the
>names of Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz and Avery.

Actually, George, when Mercker was pitching for the Braves, his name did
come to my mind when thinking about the Braves' rotation.

As for the wasted breath of the rest of your note, well, it's your air when
it's in your lungs - you can do what you want with it.
63.2654WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jul 22 1996 19:4817
    
    
       Who said he was great?
    
           You made the comment that he almost cracked Atlanta's staff.
    Anyone who follows baseball closely knows that every team has got 5
    starters. Last year for Atlanta they were Maddux,Glavine,Avery
    ,Smoltz and Mercker.
    
        This year it has been the aforementioned four and Jason Schmidt.
    Now especially if you like the team as much as you say you do, you
    would have known that.
    
        But then again with your knowledge of Baseball???
    
    
    Cha
63.2655ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 22 1996 19:5129
    
    
    Several points to make:
    
    1. Jamie Moyer is a stiff.  Read that word again - STIFF!  Boston will
    be lucky to dump his salary for a second rate STIFF or third rate
    prospect.  The Indians weren't built by an idiot, like the Sox fans 
    like to think.  Moyer is a stiff and he'll command stiff value in
    return.  If Cleveland trades for Moyer, who do they dump?  Bartolo 
    Colon will be brought up as soon as he is healthy, so exactly which
    pitcher does Cleveland drop?
    
    2. The comments made last week about Cleveland needing that left handed
    starter to get past the yankees are utter trash.  I checked the stats
    through last Wednesday, and while the yankees do have a better record
    v.s. starting RHP than starting LHP, it is not significant.
    
    3. Murray wore out his welcome in Cleveland when he was asked to play
    1B with Franco hurt and he said "Why didn't you ask me if I could play
    first before you signed Franco... BTW, my should hurts..."  Your should
    hurts this pal, go rot in Baltimore, they're done.
    
    4. Mercker may not be a top notch starter, but Cleveland has had 
    very good luck turning guys like this around.  Mercker is one of the
    two pitchers the Indians had signed last year (along with Gordon -
    thank god that didn't go through - Gordon is a bigger stiff than
    Moyer).
    
    
63.2656CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jul 22 1996 21:1110
RE  <<< Note 63.2654 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>

>           You made the comment that he almost cracked Atlanta's staff.
>    Anyone who follows baseball closely knows that every team has got 5
>    starters. Last year for Atlanta they were Maddux,Glavine,Avery
>    ,Smoltz and Mercker.
    
  Find anywhere where I said "he almost cracked Atlanta's staff". 

  George
63.2657SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jul 22 1996 21:165
    
    	Looks like the Tribe have determined that Julian Tavares is a
    stiff, they sent him to AA Buffalo and activated Greg Swindell.
    
    Ron
63.2658ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 23 1996 11:4311
    
    Ron, how are you?  How are the Dead Sox doing?  Oh, they suck... gee,
    you must be trying to stir up the pot.  Here's some food for thought
    for next time you try to report news.
    
    1. The Indians do not have anyone by the name of Julian Tavares on
    their roster.
    2. The Indians do not have a AA affiliate in Buffalo.
    3. The Indians are in first place.
    
    Hope this helps...
63.2659BREAKING/CRACKING.....ITS ALL EGGS TO MEWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Jul 23 1996 12:0520
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.2635                    CLEVELAND INDIANS                   2635 of 2654
CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs"    14 lines  22-JUL-1996 10:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mercker is really an enigma. After his no-hitter back in '94 there were
people seriously considering the possibility of him --->breaking into the Braves
starting rotation, probably the toughest place to land a pitching job in the
last few decades. However with Baltimore he's gone nowhere falling off last
year and racking up a 7+ ERA and giving up a home run every 5-6 innings so far
this season. 

  The question is, which Mercker will show up in Cleveland. He seems to be
on the decline and at best you'd have to say he's had little to no luck in
the American League.

  Maybe the tribe is looking to steal pitching signals during the World Series.

  George
63.2660ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 23 1996 12:062
    
    Indians lead over ChiSox up to 5 games...
63.2661ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 23 1996 12:062
    
    Yankmees choke away best record in AL.
63.2662SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jul 23 1996 13:4518
    
    re .2658,
    
    	So Groaner what your saying is that the Globe is wrong again?
    Yesterdays, baseball transactions.
    
    Cleveland (AL): Activated P Greg Swindell; optioned P Julian Tavarez
    to Buffalo (AA).  So I spelled Tavarez wrong, and Buffalo is AAA(?)
    BFD.
    	I'm not stirring the pot anymore then you do.  Yes, the Sox are
    having a bad year and Cleveland is right where they are suppose to be,
    in 1st place. The Sox are 10 games behind for the WC spot, which isn't
    bad considering the bullpen has 14 blown saves. Plus, the sox are
    something like 7-11 in extra inning games.
    
    Ron
    
    	I'm not stirring the pot anymore then you do. 
63.2663CSLALL::BRULEAlmost Pigskin time!!Tue Jul 23 1996 13:505
    Buffalo (AA)
    
    (AA) stands for American Association which is a AAA league
    
    Mike
63.2664Then again there's Texas to considerMKOTS3::BREENTue Jul 23 1996 14:1810
    Groaner I thought you were the one intelligent enough to throw Joe
    Huber's stats in the circular file.  Let's cut to the quick.  The third
    game vs the Yankees at New York, Hershiser and Nagy produced a split.
    
    Who pitches for Cleveland in game 3?  You better have that answer by
    7/31.  Maybe Moyer's not the guy, surely Mercker's not unless he turns
    around considerably.
    
    You'd better find a lefthander and don't lie to me.  I know, you know
    that you need a leftie at NY.  You simply are not that stupid.
63.2665ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 23 1996 14:4228
>    Groaner I thought you were the one intelligent enough to throw Joe
>    Huber's stats in the circular file.
    
    Gee, thanks.
    
>    Let's cut to the quick.  The third
>    game vs the Yankees at New York, Hershiser and Nagy produced a split.
>    Who pitches for Cleveland in game 3?  
    
    Dennis Martinez.
    
>    You better have that answer by
>    7/31.  Maybe Moyer's not the guy, surely Mercker's not unless he turns
>    around considerably.
 
    Um - there's precious little evidence which suggests Moyer would
    be a better choice than Mercker.  Sure, Mercker's had a worse season
    this year.  But he's certainly got the more impressive carreer, and
    it's not as if Moyer is even a former WS hero, or some such...
       
>    You'd better find a lefthander and don't lie to me.  I know, you know
>    that you need a leftie at NY.  You simply are not that stupid.
    
    It would be nice to have a lefty; I don't think anyone has argued that.
    But I'd far rather have a _good_ righty than some scrap heap lefty...
    Now, if the Mariners decide to trade RJ...
    
    Joe
63.2666WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Jul 23 1996 14:4611
    
    
        So Joe your giving up game 3? Dennis Martinez last beat the Yankees
    in 1982.
    
    
         Not that I'm saying either team is destined (sp) to get there. I
    think Texas/Seattle/Chicago could knock off Cleveland too. :-)
    
    
    chap
63.2667ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 23 1996 14:5014
    
>        So Joe your giving up game 3? Dennis Martinez last beat the Yankees
>    in 1982.
 
    Whoopie - he was in the NL most of that time.  I believe he can beat
    the Yankees.   
    
>         Not that I'm saying either team is destined (sp) to get there. I
>    think Texas/Seattle/Chicago could knock off Cleveland too. :-)
    
    I still see no reason to believe Cleveland won't most likely be in the
    WS.  However, given the nature of the playoffs, nothing's certain.
    
    Joe
63.2668ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 23 1996 15:0112
    
    Martinez is waiting to beat the Yankees in the playoffs to really rub
    it in.  Any win before then would just be a waste of time.
    
    Yes, I'd take a quality lefty starter.  I think Swindell or Mercker
    could possibly step forward and help.  I'd rather have a top notch
    lefty.  Does that mean Cleveland *must* have a lefty to beat the 
    Yankees - NO!
    
    NY will fade, trust me on this one.  They are over using their
    pitchers.
    
63.2669MKOTS3::BREENTue Jul 23 1996 16:047
    >   NY will fade, trust me on this one.  They are over using their
    >    pitchers.
      
    You may have something here.  Torre just may have a little Mauch in
    him.  Stubborn national league style manager who thinks pitchers always
    baby themselves anyway and besides there's always another ragarm down
    on the farm.  I'd be worried about Petitte, I agree.
63.2670ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 23 1996 16:123
    
    I'd worry about Gooden too.  How many innings did he pitch last year?
    
63.2671And Tavarez needs to get straighten outCSLALL::BRULEAlmost Pigskin time!!Tue Jul 23 1996 17:485
    Paul, Joe,
    How is Martinez coming along? When's he coming off the DL? If he
    doesn't come back fully, that would leave a hole in the rotation.
    
    Mike
63.2672PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Tue Jul 23 1996 18:374
    
    
    word from the 'burgh is that Denny Neagle may be available for trade.
    Im sure the Pirates would demand quite a bit for him though.
63.2673ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 23 1996 19:073
    
    When is he a free agent?
    
63.2674POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jul 23 1996 20:422
>    that would leave a    hole in the rotation.
		       ^_nother
63.2675TICK...TICK...TICK...TICK...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Jul 25 1996 16:378
    
    The Tribe take down Toronto last night 10-0!  Up to 6 games over the
    	White Sox!  Cleveland appears to be doing everything now since the
    	all-star break.  Nice to see!
    
    	The Presidente gets the win!
    
    	W A H O O !
63.2676IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Jul 25 1996 16:461
It must have rained outside last night...
63.2677could be 15 games with martinez back...ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jul 25 1996 17:584
    
    Hal, they laughed when I said Cleveland would build a 10 game lead...
    now those same people are in hiding... and they'll have excuses when
    it happens.
63.2678MKOTS3::BREENThu Jul 25 1996 18:312
    We do have an excuse.  Thomas got injured right about that time.  With
    the pressure off Cleveland as usual started beating up on the peons.
63.2679ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jul 25 1996 18:446
    
    Poor Frank Thomas, like Cleveland hasn't had injuries.  I think its
    safe to say that losing Julio Franco and Dennis Martinez for a month
    or more, more than outweighs the loss of Frank Thomas.
    
    Typical though, always an excuse...
63.2680MKOTS3::BREENThu Jul 25 1996 19:227
    >losing Julio Franco and Dennis Martinez for a month
    >    or more, more than outweighs the loss of Frank Thomas.
    
    
    Incredible.  Is this coming from some esoteric stat file or simple Cleveland
    fan bias.  Two anybodies vs an all-time HoFer.  Now if it had been
    Belle and Lofton injured..
63.2681ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jul 25 1996 19:267
    
    What else did I expect from Breen other than using some old adage.  Go
    look at the stats of thomas v.s. franco and throw in a #1 or #2 starter
    to boot.  The arguement is pointless, I knew you'd have an excuse and
    you did... because you ain't main enough to admit the tribe will build
    the 10 game lead.
    
63.2682ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jul 25 1996 19:2912
    
    At the point in the season prior to injury to either where they had
    both played the same number of games...
    
           Name          Team    BA     RP     HR     SB     G     AB   R   H    TB  2B  3B  HR  RBI   BB   SO  SB  CS   E
       ----------------- ----  -----  -----  -----  -----   ---   ---  --- ---  ---  --  --  --  ---   --   --  --  --  --
    1B Frank Thomas       CWS  0.343    111     21      1    73   280   57  96  177  18   0  21   75   61   45   1   1   4
    CI Julio Franco       CLE  0.328     95     10      5    73   290   52  95  143  16   1  10   53   49   58   5   7   6
    
    Martinez is 9-5.  Sure looks like they offset fairly well to me.  I
    didn't say I wouldn't rather have Thomas, I said this year the impact
    is the same.
63.2683SNAX::ERICKSONThu Jul 25 1996 19:335
    
    	Chicago better watch out for those Red Sox, only 9 games back for
    that Wild Card spot.  :^)
    
    Ron
63.2684Thomas is a dimension greater than likes of FrancoMKOTS3::BREENThu Jul 25 1996 20:4717
    You have just demonstrated as well as I've ever seen how stats, no
    matter how sophisticated they try to make them are totally misleading.
    I'll try to explain:
    	When playing Chicago any team instructs their pitcher "Do not throw
    such and such a pitch to Thomas ever, if behind in the count do not..,
    do not...
    
    	When playing Cleveland "For Franco keep it down..."
    
    Franco is a reasonably good hitter and will pick up stats because of
    Belle and the rest (even more with a lineup following Thomas like in
    '94) but there is only one Frank Thomas.
    
    If you don't have stats to prove my point then it is I saying don't
    waste my time unless you have proof.  Meaning you can't and I can't
    prove it but if you don't know it, see it or accept it then you're not
    dealing with reality just fantasy baseball.
63.2685ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jul 25 1996 20:554
    
    We're comparing Thomas v.s. Franco *AND* Martinez for this year,
    right now... not comparing Thomas v.s. Franco (ONLY, long term).
    
63.2686No comparisonEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jul 25 1996 21:2215
>    We're comparing Thomas v.s. Franco *AND* Martinez for this year,
>    right now... not comparing Thomas v.s. Franco (ONLY, long term).
    
    I'd still go with Thomas.  As Thomas goes, so go the White Sox.
    The Sox are hurting badly without him.
    
    Cleveland can do without Franco indefinitely (his _expected_ 
    performance over the time he missed is not that far above 
    replacement level), and while they need the Dennis Martinez 
    of last season, it's just not the same as losing an everyday 
    MVP-type like Frank Thomas.
    
    glenn
    
63.2687ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jul 26 1996 03:297
    
    Sorry Glenn, i disagree.  Put Martinez as the #5 starter in the White
    Sox rotation and they would not be hurting like they are.  Bottom line
    and key point, I said Cleveland would build the lead to 10 games and 
    some bozo indicated the ChiSox would pass Cleveland.  Said bozo is 
    now in hiding and others are making excuses for the slide.  Make any
    excuse you want, Cleveland will have this race wrapped up Sept 1.
63.2688K A B O O M ! ! ! !SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Jul 26 1996 12:356
    
    	Albert puts two out of the park last night and breaks up another 
    	double play after being hit.  Excelent play!  Nagy gets his 12th
    	win!  Not sure what Chicago did last night...
    
    	W A H O O !
63.2689ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jul 26 1996 13:224
    
    Hal, Chicago lost... Cleveland is now 7 games up... I'm expecting more
    excuses today on the predicted 10 game lead...  some people just don't
    learn, they don't want to admit that the Indians are awesome!
63.2690BSS::NEUZILFri Jul 26 1996 14:006

	After Belle's two homers last night, he became the all time Cleveland
	Indian home run hitter.  Anyone know (or care) who he passed?

	Kevin
63.2691Nobody really cares but.......LUDWIG::BTOWERFri Jul 26 1996 14:211
    I don't really care but I'd guess Rocky Colavito.
63.2692ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 26 1996 14:214
    
    Earl Averill.
    
    Joe
63.2693ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jul 26 1996 14:292
    
    I'd go with Averill or Boudreau
63.2694The Ohioans speakLUDWIG::BTOWERFri Jul 26 1996 14:341
    Yeah but do you guys really care?
63.2695A L B E R T B E L L E SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Jul 26 1996 14:448
    
    	TICK...
    		TICK...
    			TICK...
    
    
    
    		T I C K !!!
63.2696CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Jul 26 1996 14:5515
|                         -< A L B E R T   B E L L E  >-
|
|    
|    	TICK...
|    		TICK...
|    			TICK...
|    
|    
|    
|    		T I C K !!!


Yeah, we're all wondering when Joey is going to explode again in another
voilent outburst too....

63.2697IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Jul 26 1996 15:1613
|                         -< A L B E R T   B E L L E  >-
|
|    
|    	TICK...
|    		TICK...
|    			TICK...
|    
|    
|    
|    		T I C K !!!


He really shouldn't go out in the woods in short pants...
63.2698ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 26 1996 15:218
    
>    Yeah but do you guys really care?
    
    Yes.
    
    And, just to clarify, Averill was not a guess, but the correct answer.
    
    Joe
63.2699you guys are getting him mad nowPECAD8::CHILDSFri Jul 26 1996 17:126
>> And, just to clarify, Averill was not a guess, but the correct answer.
                ^^^^^^^              ^^^^^^^^^^^

 geez who wizzed in your wheaties?

 ;^)
63.2700ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Jul 26 1996 17:148
    
    ???
    
    What makes you think I was upset?  I was just clarifying (since
    guesses were made after I posted the answer) that my answer was
    not, in fact, a guess, but the correct answer...
    
    Joe
63.2701IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Jul 26 1996 17:204
It came off as a little self-righteous.

Of course, how that could happen in the context of this notes file is
totally beyond me... :-)
63.2702because they doubted you.....PECAD8::CHILDSFri Jul 26 1996 17:264
 Clarify's an awfully strong word for you to use.....

 ;^)
63.2703TICK...TICK...TICK...TICK...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Jul 26 1996 19:036
    
    	Albert Belle is just a good hard nosed baseball player!  I'd take
    	him on my team anyday!
    
    	The Chief,
    		WAHOO!
63.2704ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jul 26 1996 19:164
    
    Hal, he is on your team.  Doesn't Bruce Tower remind you of Albert a
    little, except Albert still has power, and other than his dominating
    days in B and C division, has Tower ever had power?
63.2705AWECIM::RUSSOclaimin!Fri Jul 26 1996 19:516
    
    Wow, ragging on teamates.....you'd never see me ragging on a teamate,
    like say Glenn "Out trying to stretch a cheap hit single into a double"
    Waugaman ;^)
    
    Dave
63.2706 "Ping"STRATA::BTOWERFri Jul 26 1996 19:574
    Yes, I am like Albert in that I could SNAP at any moment. I keep having
    these voice's tell me to implant TPS into the forehead of a blond
    headed clevelanite. 8>). But I am taking my medicine on a regular
    basis. (today anyway).  
63.2707ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jul 26 1996 21:023
    
    Don't bust up that TPS pal, that's my chance to go deep this year...
    that one at Stow should have been out!
63.2708I did this once and Glenn ragged me when I told himMKOTS3::BREENFri Jul 26 1996 21:2217
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Note 63.2705                    CLEVELAND INDIANS                  
    2705 of 2707
    AWECIM::RUSSO "claimin!"                              6 lines 
    26-JUL-1996 15:51
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        
        Wow, ragging on teamates.....you'd never see me ragging on a
    teamate,
        like say Glenn "Out trying to stretch a cheap hit single into a
    double"
        Waugaman ;^)
        
        Dave
     End of note 
    
    I didn't hear about this one.  Did he slide?
63.2709:-)ROCK::GRONOWSKISat Jul 27 1996 15:292
    
    Glenn's too short to play softball.
63.2710AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherSun Jul 28 1996 11:393
    
    
     Height means nothing.
63.2711PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Mon Jul 29 1996 16:244
    re a few back about Denny Neagle.
    
    
     Neagle is signed through next year. 
63.2712ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 29 1996 17:414
    
    
    Heath has zero jacks this year.
    Glenn is ascared to play in DMSL.
63.2713EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryMon Jul 29 1996 17:4910
>    Glenn is ascared to play in DMSL.
    
    My arm's dead, I'm too short, I'm ascared to play in the DMSL (even
    though I live in backwoods NH)... where you getting your scouting 
    reports Groaner?
    
    glenn
    
    
63.2714ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jul 29 1996 18:026
    
    I didn't say your arm was dead... all I know is, when I look at eye
    level parallel to the ground (seeing nothing below eye level), I 
    can't see you or George Brooks = too short.
    
    Maybe is was DrM who told me you were ascared to play in DMSL.
63.2715ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Jul 30 1996 11:225
    
    I'm completely baffled.  Hope Hart knows what the heck he's doing...
    trading talent for talent is one thing, but there are humans and
    individuals involved.  Baerga was a large part of the Tribe's heart.
    Cleveland better sign Knoblauch at the end of the year now.
63.2716ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 30 1996 12:2212
    
    Stupid.  Stupid.  Stupid.
    
    Even if you _want_ Kent (and having a good RH hitter isn't a bad
    thing - but there's _no_ reason to prefer a 3B - that's not the
    problem vs. lefties), there's no reason to give up Baerga to get
    him.  If the Indians put Kent at 2B and let Vizciano rot on the
    bench, they won't have hurt themselves _too_ badly talent-wise.
    Baerga is overrated (he never walks), but was still a major part
    of Cleveland's future.
    
    Joe
63.2717Personally, I'd BLAM the media...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jul 30 1996 13:3311
    Trading Baerga comes as a complete shock to me.  Did anyone see
    this coming?  I'm waiting for the for the other shoe to drop here.
    It has to be related to Baerga's bad-attitude rep, which by my
    guess means that Hargrove wanted Baerga out.
    
    The Red Sox need Knoblauch, bad.  For the money involved I'd rather
    have Knoblauch than Alomar...
    
    glenn
    
63.2718AKEEM::GRONOWSKITue Jul 30 1996 14:169
    
    
    F the Indians.
    
    Only way I feel any better is if Knoblauch shows up in Cleveland later
    this week.  Everyone knows Hart covets Knoblauch, and Chuck would fit
    perfectly into the line-up... wants to stay in Minnesota, but I'm
    sure would rather be in CLE for a winner than BOS with the other
    losers.
63.2719EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jul 30 1996 15:116
    
    The Indians don't need Knoblauch... they've got Vizcaino...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2720Hart PanickedPOWDML::GARBARINOTue Jul 30 1996 17:2022
The time to judge a GM is when everything isn't turning up roses (ie: last
year for Cle).  I think Hart is panicking.  There were rumors that Baerga
was going to Florida for Sheffield.  There were reports that Cleveland
thinks his hitting isn't the same this year.  But beware of momentary
changes in performance (eg: Wade Boggs' last year in Boston).  This kid
can hit, and he produces runs...and will continue to do both for a long
time.

Kent and Vizciano don't equal Carlos Baerga...and that's before you
consider the intangibles.  The Mets' asst GM was on WFAN last night
and after they calmed him down from his almost giddy jubilation, he
said that Kent wasn't hitting, especially not with runners in scoring
position.  He said he's never been the player they thought they were
getting.  He then said this was a "NO-BRAINER".  When GMs use this
term they're saying that they couldn't say "YES" fast enough, and
couldn't believe what they were being offered.

Cleveland isn't as dominant as last year, but they're going to be
in the post-season any way.  Do they honestly think that 1-HR Vizciano
and utilityman Kent are more important to their chances than Baerga ???
As Baerga put it, "it would be different if they had acquired a quality
pitcher, 'cause that's what we need".
63.2721SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townTue Jul 30 1996 17:267
                    <<< Note 63.2720 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>
                               -< Hart Panicked >-

>As Baerga put it, "it would be different if they had acquired a quality
>pitcher, 'cause that's what we need".

Like Mark Clark....
63.2722TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 30 1996 17:3020
    
    Joe,
    
>The time to judge a GM is when everything isn't turning up roses (ie: last
>year for Cle).  I think Hart is panicking.
    
    The odd thing is that there was no indication of panic before this.
    The Poole for Carreon move, followed by the release of Leius, was
    clearly positive.  Giving Murray's playing time to Burnitz and
    Giles was certainly a move in the right direction.  If the Indians
    trade for Knoblauch now, this move is only illogical; the only
    rational explanation I can think of is that:
    
    1) Hart's got a deal set for Knoblauch, and
    2) Hart didn't feel Baerga could be benched.
    
    Even so, Baerga's worth more than Kent and Vizcaino.  A trade for
    Kent and Alfonzo I could have lived with a bit easier...
    
    Joe
63.2723Yankee preperation?ILBBAK::SILVESTRISoar with the Eagles!Tue Jul 30 1996 19:0514
	The analysts on ESPN's Baseball Tonight claimed the Indians feel
	that Baerga has lost a lot of speed, both in the infield and
	at bat ... they claim he isn't getting to balls that he used to
	get to and that he has broken more than 90 bats this season
	(twice the number anyone else on the team has broken) which is
	a sign of poor bat speed ... they also claimed that the Indians
	were not happy with his reporting to training camp over weight ...

	Carlos on the other hand, vowed to return to Cleveland next year
	in a Mets uniform when the All-Star game is played there ...

	And he was right, the Indians need pitching, not offense ...

	Vinny
63.2724ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jul 30 1996 19:4514
    
    Vinny,
    
>	And he was right, the Indians need pitching, not offense ...
    
    The indians are third in the league in runs scored, and third in ERA.
    While a single, top-notch _pitcher_ would be the most valuable
    addition, _pitching_ in general is no more of a need than hitting.
    
    And there's no particular reason to believe that the Baerga trade
    will in any way improve the hitting vs. lefties; in 1995, Kent hit
    .248 vs. lefties (.306 OBP, .376 SLG).
    
    Joe
63.2725I don't see their logic.STRATA::BTOWERWed Jul 31 1996 11:227
    This kind of trade could do more damage to "team chemistry" more than 
    anything else. Baerga, as management said had been there from the
    beginning of the Indian transformation into a high quality team in the
    early 90's. They should have waited till the end of the year to dump
    Carlos if they were not happy with him. They have a big enough lead
    in the division, I don't understand needing these two guys instead
    of Baerga at all. I think it's gonna backfire on em bigtime.
63.2726tick tick tick TICK!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Aug 01 1996 14:4223
    
    	Bottom of the 9th....bases loaded....two out.....down 2-0.......
    
    	up comes Albert Belle......
    
    
    			TICK
    				TICK	
    					TICK
    						TICK
    
    
    
    
    
    			K A B O O M ! ! ! ! ! ! !
    
    
    	Grand Slam! Gave over!  Tribe wins...4-2!
    
    
    		W A H O O O O O O O O O O!
    
63.2727AKEEM::GRONOWSKIThu Aug 01 1996 15:432
    
    Baboom
63.2728One hell of a catch.STRATA::BTOWERMon Aug 05 1996 17:502
    "HOW ABOUT THAT" catch by Kenny Lofton yesterday. One of the best I've
    seen in a long long time.  
63.2729one question...IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue Aug 06 1996 12:366
...how come Hal doesn't enter a "TICK... TICK... TICK..." note when Greg
Swindell enters a ballgame?

It's readily apparent that he is not an answer to filling any kind of slot
in their pitching staff.
63.2730ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Aug 06 1996 13:445
    
    No doubt.  Hopefully John Hart hasn't gone completely daft, though,
    and will give Swindell the boot at the next convenient opportunity.
    
    Joe
63.2731Indians should have grabbed MoyerMKOTS3::BREENTue Aug 06 1996 14:046
    Joe, Roland, Paul...  didn't Cleveland have someone in the organization
    the equal or greater than Darren Bragg?  Or does Hart figure to do
    better than Jamie Moyer via a waiver deal.
    
    re. All these players currently clearing waivers.. when a deal is made
    can it still be blocked by a lower ranking club?
63.2732IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue Aug 06 1996 14:103
I thought that if a player cleared waivers, the deal couldn't be blocked.

But, as we know, I am occasionally wrong... :-)
63.2733ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Aug 06 1996 15:2011
    
    Sure, Cleveland has Brian Giles, who isn't terribly different from
    Darren Bragg, and Jeromy Burnitz, who is also roughly the same player.
    
    I'd rather have any of them than Moyer...
    
    w.r.t. waivers - once a player has _cleared_ waivers, deals can be
    made.  If a team trys to grab the player as part of a deal, a lower
    ranking club can block them.
    
    Joe
63.2734Come to think of it maybe it is #2MKOTS3::BREENWed Aug 07 1996 15:2119
    Bragg was obviously better for the Redsox than Moyer.  To win important
    games in the postseason (or in Cleveland's case, down the stretch I
    fear) Moyer might be the right guy.
    
    re.
    
    >    w.r.t. waivers - once a player has _cleared_ waivers, deals can be
    >    made.  If a team trys to grab the player as part of a deal, a lower
    >    ranking club can block them.
        
    Waiver clearing is in process right now I believe, Duquette says he put
    a bunch of sox on waivers, surely including Greenwell.  If the Whitesox
    wanted to block Cleveland from dealing for Greenwell do they have to do
    it now in anticipation of the deal or later.  I'm guessing they have to
    block before the waiver period is over without knowing about any deal.
    
    Or are you saying that if a deal is concluded after this waiver period
    a Cleveland puts a claim in for Greenwell then the pale hose can claim
    Greenie first?
63.2735ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Aug 07 1996 15:3022
    
>    Waiver clearing is in process right now I believe, Duquette says he put
>    a bunch of sox on waivers, surely including Greenwell.  If the Whitesox
>    wanted to block Cleveland from dealing for Greenwell do they have to do
>    it now in anticipation of the deal or later.  I'm guessing they have to
>    block before the waiver period is over without knowing about any deal.
>    
>    Or are you saying that if a deal is concluded after this waiver period
>    a Cleveland puts a claim in for Greenwell then the pale hose can claim
>    Greenie first?
    
    Not quite...
    
    Deals can be accomplished one of two ways:
    
    1) Player G is put on waivers.  If no one claims him, he can be traded
       without difficulty.
    
    2) Player G is put on waivers, and the team he's being traded to
       claims him.  A lower ranking team can then pull rank.
    
    Joe
63.2736POWDML::GARBARINOWed Aug 07 1996 15:416
Typically a team puts almost all of their players on waivers during this
period, then pulls back those that get claimed and they don't want to lose.
If someone clears waivers, they can be traded at anytime without having
to go thru the waiver process again.  If someone was claimed and pulled
back, I believe they have to go thru waivers again if the club wants to
trade that player later.  True ?
63.2737TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Aug 07 1996 15:462
    
    True.
63.2738EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Aug 08 1996 14:4114
>    No doubt.  Hopefully John Hart hasn't gone completely daft, though,
>    and will give Swindell the boot at the next convenient opportunity.
    
    Based on that ESPN report that aired yesterday, reading between
    the lines it seemed pretty clear that Hart and the Indians thought
    that Baerga was doing too much partying.  Of course at the surface
    both Hargrove and Hart claim that this was baseball-interests-only
    trade, but then they turn around and use loaded comments like
    misplaced priorities, not getting enough sleep, sending a wake-up
    call, etc.
    
    glenn
     
63.2739IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Aug 08 1996 15:024
>not getting enough sleep, sending a wake-up
>call, etc

yeah, these two don't really go together that well...
63.2740IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Aug 08 1996 15:0611
More on the "why not pick up Moyer instead of Swindell" front:

	Moyer pitched a nice game against the Tribe last night, gave up
	only two runs, I believe was positioned to pick up the win, but
	had the bullpen give up 3 in the ninth.

Jamie Moyer is not a savior, but he doesn't have nearly as many fork
marks as Swindell.

I think Hart is doing a good job, but finding that it's easier to make a bad
team good than to make a good team better.
63.2741Albert needs it!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Aug 12 1996 20:0516
    
    	TICK
    
    		TICK
    
    			TICK
    
    				TICK
    
    					TICK
    
    						TICK
    
    							TICK
    
    
63.2742AKEEM::GRONOWSKIMon Aug 12 1996 20:573
    
    KABOOM!
    
63.2743Lets try it again...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Aug 13 1996 19:3719
    
    	Well, Albert did it up yesterday...not the big one but a big
    	bases loaded single that put the Tribe up to stay!  Indians win
    	5-4 with Oral getting his 12th win of the season.
    
    
    
    	TICK	
    		T I C K
    
    			T  I  C  K
    
    				T   I   C   K
    
    					T     I     C     K
    
    
    	The Chief,
    		WAHOOOOOOOOOOO!
63.2744AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherWed Aug 14 1996 10:333
    
    
     Orel Hal Orel
63.2745TICK...TICK...TICK...TICK...TICK...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Aug 14 1996 15:1213
    
    
    
    		K   A   B   O   O   M   !   !   !
    
    
    
    
    	Albert hits his 39th homer of the season...a solo shot in a loosing
    	cause against the Angles....
    
    
    	WAHOOOOOOO!
63.2746Numbers hangerMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Wed Aug 14 1996 15:204
    
    	>> ...a solo shot in a loosing cause
    
           Standard Albert.
63.2747no clue, media opinion is his opinionLIFT::GRONOWSKIWed Aug 14 1996 15:424
    
    >> Standard Albert.
    
    Standard Brydie
63.2748But as Lofton goes, so goes...MKOTS3::BREENWed Aug 14 1996 17:2711
    You might have mentioned Albert's game-saving catch in the same game.
    
    That's a little above and beyond the standard Albert.
    
    I'll have to give a little grudging credit to Hargrove for keeping that
    bunch together this year.  Each has had his little slumps but
    rebounded.
    
    And since I've gone this far, a little credit to Joe Huber for pointing
    out Thome as being a lot better than anyone, including his own coaches,
    thinks.
63.2749ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Aug 14 1996 21:562
    
    Joe isn't the only one who's been pushing for Thome.
63.2750ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Aug 27 1996 14:163
    
    Lead now at 9 games, where are the bozos who said 10 games was out of
    the question?
63.2751MFGFIN::JACKSONProfit millions,lose jobWed Aug 28 1996 03:168
      Groaner,
    
      Where are all those predictions you made about Black Jack between
    .1800 and .1900?
    
      There sure are alot of deleted notes in that span...
    
      Tim
63.2752ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Aug 28 1996 13:512
    
    Tribe 10 games up, 'nuff said losers.
63.2753TICK, TICK, T I C K, T I C K, T I C K ! !SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Aug 28 1996 14:5511
    
    	Albert and Thome both smack big ones last night...#42 for Belle!!!
    
    	Dennis looks to be out for the season...only went 2/3 of an inning.
    
    	Bring on the Sox!!!
    
    
    		The Chief,
    			WAHOO!
    
63.2754get off the drugs, things may be clearerROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Aug 28 1996 15:0111
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.2677                    CLEVELAND INDIANS                   2677 of 2753
ROCK::GRONOWSKI                                       4 lines  25-JUL-1996 13:58
                  -< could be 15 games with martinez back... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Hal, they laughed when I said Cleveland would build a 10 game lead...
    now those same people are in hiding... and they'll have excuses when
    it happens.
63.275510 1/2 game leadROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Aug 28 1996 20:063
    
    Another HR and 4 more RBI for Belle today (and the game's not over
    yet).
63.2756KKKKAAAAABBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Aug 28 1996 20:265
    
    	and.....the score!!!!!
    
    
    W A H O O O O O O ! ! ! ! ! ! 
63.27579-3 finalROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Aug 28 1996 20:552
    
    It was like a hundred to nothing.
63.2758ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Aug 28 1996 20:577
    
    
    When is the last time a team had 3 guys with more than 100 RBI?
    
    Belle has 129 - Leads league (MO WHO?)
    Thome has 94
    Ramirez has 95
63.2759Try and keep up, Groaner...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Aug 28 1996 21:088
   
>    When is the last time a team had 3 guys with more than 100 RBI?
 
    Colorado Rockies, couple of weeks ago, now working on 4...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.2760SNAX::ERICKSONWed Aug 28 1996 21:133
    re .2755,
    
    	What do you expect when your playing Detroit?   :^)
63.2761PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Wed Aug 28 1996 22:582
    ...and the those who have kept up, the Rockies are working on the
    record of the 1929? Yankmes.
63.2762Fess upMFGFIN::JACKSONProfit millions,lose jobWed Aug 28 1996 23:196
      Whats a matter Groaner, embarresed to admit you made a wrong
    prediction about Black Jack?
    
      I knew I should have extracted those predicitons!
    
      Tim
63.2763WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Aug 29 1996 12:203
    
    
       Seattle Does have 3 guys over 100 RBI?
63.2764Thome gets another one too...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Aug 29 1996 16:3629
    
	Now, did I predict this one or what????
    
    
    		Mean Albert does it again.....43 and counting!
    
    	The Chief,
    		WAHOO!
    
    
    
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.2753                    CLEVELAND INDIANS                   2753 of 2763
SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR "Central Division Champs=Indians"  11 lines  28-AUG-1996 10:55
              -< TICK, TICK, T I C K, T I C K, T  I  C  K  !  ! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    	Albert and Thome both smack big ones last night...#42 for Belle!!!
    
    	Dennis looks to be out for the season...only went 2/3 of an inning.
    
    	Bring on the Sox!!!
    
    
    		The Chief,
    			WAHOO!
    
63.2765ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Aug 29 1996 16:553
    
    Baboom..
    
63.2766UNTOUCHABLEFABSIX::R_LUCHT&quot;Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof&quot;Fri Aug 30 1996 04:377
	Hate to tell you guys, but you're not going to be able to touch the 	
	Braves. With Neagle added to the already best pitching squad in 	
	baseball, and the emergence of their young outfielder, the only 	
	-TICK-TICK-TICK- is the countdown until the Indians are swept out of the
		World Series.

						Rich......
63.2767ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Aug 30 1996 13:504
    
    Oh, okay... Rich says the Braves are a lock.  Hey pal, why not sell
    your house and go to Vegas... put your money where your mouth is...
    probably just another frustrated Sox fan in high heels.
63.2768GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Fri Aug 30 1996 15:435
    
    Maybe he could make a p-name bet with you.  Oh wait, what am I talking
    about......you'd welch on it.
    
    Claybone
63.2769ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Aug 30 1996 16:492
    
    I followed the letter of the wager exactly.  
63.2770GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Fri Aug 30 1996 18:094
    
    	"I am not a crook."
    
    		- Richard Milhouse Gronowski
63.2771VMSNET::MCGONIGALSat Aug 31 1996 02:2613
>                     <<< Note 63.1863 by ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R >>>
> 
>>    All I have to say is... when the season is over and Black Jack
>>    is sporting his 23-6 record and in the running for the Cy Young...
>>    three words... "told you so!"
>
>
>     If this happens, I'll be in the crow note.  OTOH, If (as is more likely)
>     he is 13 or 14 wins and 11 defeats, I'm sure you'll have made yourself
>     scarce.


      Or maybe make his notes scarce.  Coward.
63.2772ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Sep 03 1996 02:092
    
    I love all these read-only ladies.
63.2773Talk about Lame promises?????????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Sep 03 1996 13:1711
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 7.1661              The American League (Baseball)             1661 of 1663
ROCK::GRONOWSKI                                       4 lines   3-MAY-1996 14:03
                        -< no team in the AL is close. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    If they Braves get to the WS this year, we'll see just how good or bad
    they'll do against the Tribe.  Cleveland is a lock for the WS again
    this year.
63.2774MFGFIN::JACKSONOnlysayingwhatsonmymindTue Sep 03 1996 22:248
      The name slinging is Pauls only out when you look at .2771.  It looks
    like someone has saved your predictions.
    
      Atlanta is the team to beat in the NL.  The tribe is arguably the
    team in the AL to beat.  Do you think if the said teams meet in the WS,
    the tribe will beat the braves?  Maybe, but a VERY slim chance of it.
    
      Tim
63.2775ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Sep 04 1996 18:113
    
    Both teams have to get there before we will find out.  Is Atlanta a
    better team?  Right now, probably so.  Will they repeat?  Unknown.
63.2776CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Sep 04 1996 18:2711
RE                     <<< Note 63.2775 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>

>    Both teams have to get there before we will find out.  Is Atlanta a
>    better team?  Right now, probably so.  Will they repeat?  Unknown.

  Well, not RIGHT now. The Braves have lost 7 of their last 10 including
several to the Cubies. They seem to be in a slump.

  Better to get it over with now and heat up in time for the playoffs.

  George
63.2777ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Sep 05 1996 16:4012
    
    Cleveland has not peaked yet this year.  The addition of Seitzer is
    huge.  Getting Franco back is huge.  Thome is having a great season and
    so is Belle.  They need the pitching to get rolling... but they only
    really need 3 starters in the playoffs and a spot 4th.  Nagy has been
    huge all year, Ogea is really coming on... Hershiser is there... so one
    of McDowell or Martinez need to get their act together and Mesa needs
    to peak.
    
    Cleveland will be tough to beat in the playoffs.  Despite what chappy
    thinks.  The Yackmees, if they make it, will have burnt out their
    rotation.
63.2778WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Sep 05 1996 19:213
    
    
        Yeah Cone will be real burnt out!!
63.2779MKOTS3::BREENThu Sep 05 1996 19:594
    You're going to elect to go the playoffs and world series without a
    left-handed starter again.  Oh well, good luck; last year you told me
    you knew what you were doing.  You do have Anderson, how's he look to
    face the Yankees,RedSox(In Dreams I Walk...),Seattle?
63.2780ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Sep 05 1996 21:2912
    
    No lefty starter is needed.  If they could have gotten one, that is
    great, but they don't need one. 
    
    As for Cone, lets see a couple of more games.  Gee would i be crushed
    if he went down again... but it doesn't matter.  With Wetteland out,
    Rivera is getting used up.  Gooden is done.
    
    Lots of shooting the mouth off from someone who is ascared to bet
    better record as season's end... and don't look in the rear view
    mirror, but you've choked away 8 games of a 12 game lead... with a
    big series against the O's and Sox coming up.
63.2781PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Fri Sep 06 1996 12:438
    >> No lefty starter is needed.  If they could have gotten one, that is
    >> great, but they don't need one. 
    
    I'm still surprised they did not get Neagle. Reports in Pittsburgh
    prior to his trade had him going to Cleveland for 2 highly rated
    prospects and an established (non-starter) player. He would of been a
    great boost for the Indian's pitching staff - now he is the 4th starter
    for the Braves pitching staff.
63.2782TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Sep 06 1996 12:495
    
    According to Hart, the Indians offer was Branyan, Graves, Wright,
    and Wilson, which is, IMHO, at least as good as the Braves offer...
    
    Joe
63.2783EDWIN::WAUGAMANThe Steelers really need Scott ZolakFri Sep 06 1996 12:5610
                                            
>    According to Hart, the Indians offer was Branyan, Graves, Wright,
>    and Wilson, which is, IMHO, at least as good as the Braves offer...
    
    So much for the theory that teams just will no longer trade topnotch 
    prospects for stretch-drive acquisitions.  As I recall, both Graves
    and Wright were "untouchable".
    
    glenn
    
63.2784WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Sep 06 1996 14:063
    
    
       Don't bet with welchers!!
63.2785ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Sep 06 1996 15:233
    
    Neagle isn't exactly Doyle Alexander.  If you're getting someone for
    the drive and the future, you can afford to give up top prospects.
63.2786IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Sep 06 1996 15:583
>   Neagle isn't exactly Doyle Alexander. 

For one thing, he's probably a nicer guy...
63.2787MKOTS3::BREENFri Sep 06 1996 17:368
    What is Cleveland going to do with Seitzer, switch him with Thome
    (3b<->dh)?  They should have grabbed Moyer but I'm glad the Sox got
    Bragg.  I'm beginning to become more of a Belle fan from at least a
    pure baseball point of view.  He got totally shafted in the Vina
    incident.  I wonder if he's learning not to be the outspoken guy about
    media outrageous, intrusive behavior.
    
    Baerga trade hasn't seemed to hurt them.  What's Kent doing?
63.2788Interesting reading......:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Sep 06 1996 19:28163
            <<< HUMANE::DISK$SCSI:[NOTES$LIBRARY]BASEBALL.NOTE;2 >>>
                                 -< Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 30.805                The Cleveland Indians Note                 805 of 805
ALFSS2::TAYLOR_D "and run those fat tackles 2 deat" 156 lines   6-SEP-1996 14:48
                               -< Hand-wringing >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Gleaned this from the Akron Beacon-Journal website.  For good daily
    Tribe coverage, this is the place to go on the 'net.
    
    http://www.ohio.com/bj/sports/indians/index.html
    
    
Beacon Journal Extra: Sports Story

Tribe poised for quick exit	

A plethera of problems surrounds the team as it approaches
post-season

BY SHELDON OCKER
Beacon Journal sports writer

September 6, 1996

The Indians' seven-game lead over the White Sox notwithstanding, a
Tribe return to the World Series looks iffy at best.

Moreover, there are substantive reasons to rate Cleveland's
chances as bleak for earning a rematch with the Braves, the likely
winners of the National League pennant.

The Indians' rotation is in disarray. They haven't been winning at
home. Probable playoff opponents Texas and New York have walked all
over them. The offense has a maddening tendency to hibernate with
runners in scoring position, and Cleveland's fundamentals are
fundamentally second rate.

Yet Manager Mike Hargrove said, "Since the All-Star break, I
think we've played pretty good baseball."

Keep in mind that part of Hargrove's job is to keep the
competitive fires burning within the hearts of his troops. The odds
that Hargrove will make negative projections about his team are the
same as the odds that Casey Candaele will lead the American League
in home runs. 

That's the way the manager is supposed to look at his world.
Nevertheless, within this context, Hargrove knows not all is rosy.

The facts are these. Since May 26, the Indians are 49-43. Since June
20, they are 14-17 at their beloved Jacobs Field. Since the All-Star
break, they are 30-22. Since Aug. 9, they are 5-12 against every
team except the Tigers.

In other words, it's difficult to conjure up a won-loss statistic
that makes the Tribe look good.

"We see our club every day, so things we don't like really look
ugly," Hargrove said. "But things are just as ugly on other teams."

In other words, the more powerful the magnifying glass, the more
flaws are likely to come into view.

But that wasn't true last year, and maybe that's part of the problem.
The public and the media probably were spoiled by the Indians' 1995
record of 100-44 and 30-game lead over second-place Kansas City.

"People compare last year to this year, and there is no
comparison," Hargrove said. "Everything that could go right did
go right. This year is more normal from that standpoint. We got
all the breaks last season."

That said, Hargrove isn't unaware of the team's problems,
especially the uncertainties surrounding the rotation.

Dennis Martinez is on the disabled list. Nobody knows if he can
pitch again this season, or ever.

And if he says he's ready, there is little time to put him to
the test before the final playoff roster is set.

Then there's Jack McDowell, who has made five consecutive subpar
starts. McDowell swears he isn't hurt, but neither he nor the
Tribe coaching staff has been able to isolate his problem.

"The rotation is the main concern right now," Hargrove said. "We
need to have Jack throwing the ball the way he can. And Albie Lopez
not lasting through the fifth inning the other day is a big concern.

"But Orel (Hershiser), Charlie (Nagy) and Chad (Ogea) are pitching
well, and we still have three weeks to settle in."

Lopez is the lesser issue unless both Martinez and McDowell remain
unproductive.

In his last start against the Brewers, Lopez was sailing along with
a lead until the fifth inning, when a bloop single and three walks
led to his departure.

McDowell's dilemma has evaded a solution so far.

"Jack is not a mechanics guy," Hargrove said. "He doesn't pay
too much attention to mechanics. He's been that way from Day 1.
But there are some things that we've picked up on."

One thing that stands in stark contrast to last year is
Cleveland's injury situation.

In 1995, the Tribe stayed exceptionally healthy. Hershiser
missed a couple of weeks early, and Eddie Murray missed a month.

Spring training 1996 had hardly begun when Omar Vizquel hurt his 
shoulder. Though he continues to play every day, there is no
question that the injury has contributed to his team-leading
error total of 18.

In addition, Julio Franco was plagued for two months by a
hamstring pull; Martinez is making his second appearance on the
disabled list with a sore elbow, and Mark Carreon has been
sidelined for more than a week with a deep bruise to his shin.

Cleveland's depth suffered when Herbert Perry underwent knee 
surgery more than two months ago. Though he was playing for
Triple-A Buffalo, Perry was the first option if the Indians
needed a first baseman. And they did when Franco went down.

It is difficult to measure the impact of the Tribe's inability
to execute basic plays on offense and defense. But anyone who
has watched the team knows it has made a significant difference.

"Any time you have a team with a lot of talented people, they have
the confidence to make things happen," Hargrove said. "They have a
tendency to do too much  --  to throw a runner out when common sense
tells them that they can't, or try to take an extra base when the
opportunity isn't there."

The Indians also have been victimized by poor play in the outfield.
Albert Belle, Kenny Lofton and Manny Ramirez have combined for 26
errors. All three are among the league's top six outfielders in
errors.

"I don't know what to attribute that to," Hargrove said. "Except
sometimes players try to do too much."

Hargrove also believes the Indians have had problems coping with
distractions that were absent a year ago.

Belle's run-ins with photographers, rival second basemen and
TV cameramen are the most obvious. Also, the trades of Eddie
Murray and Carlos Baerga seemed to have a disruptive effect, at
least in the short term.

"We've had a lot more distractions this year, both internally and
externally," Hargrove said.

Considering everything that might go wrong, Hargrove remains
optimistic. Yet even he concedes that a quick exit from the
playoffs is more than possible.

"That's in the back of every manager's mind," he said. "If an 
opposing team gets hot, bad things can happen."   
    
63.2789ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Sep 06 1996 20:0612
    
    Yeah, Sheldon Ocker is IMHO the best writer covering the Indians.
    I don't share all of Ocker's concerns, but do agree with some of them.
    
    IMHO, a playoff rotation of Nagy-Hershiser-Ogea will be fine.
    The hitting concerns me more; Vizciano stinks, and Alomar hasn't
    been nearly as good as he was last year.  OTOH, Vizquel's had a
    great year with the bat, Belle, Ramirez, Lofton, and particularly
    Thome are excellent hitters; the bench is _much_ stronger than last
    year, which will also help.
    
    Joe
63.2790WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Sep 06 1996 20:167
    
    
       Yabuut Cleveland will use Nagy/Hershiser/McDowell.
    
    
    
    Chap
63.2791NQOS01::nqsrv109.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchSat Sep 07 1996 04:045
    
 >   I love all these read-only ladies.

Almost as bad as low life scumbags who write something embarassing and then 
delete the note.
63.2792Is that a kaboom;-)MFGFIN::JACKSONThe time is nearSat Sep 07 1996 04:411
    
63.2793ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Sep 09 1996 12:566
    
    Not as bad as the people who note from annonymous accounts in direct
    violation of DEC policy because they are ascared to note from their own
    account.
    
    
63.2794SNAX::ERICKSONMon Sep 09 1996 13:512
    
    	What happened to that 10+ game lead?
63.2795PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Mon Sep 09 1996 15:121
    What anonymous account?  I know who that was.
63.2796NQOS01::nqsrv229.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchMon Sep 09 1996 16:397
It was me groaner.  Since I've moved to teamlinks/win95 I have no control over 
what goes into the author space.  I'll try to remember to sign my name nexted 
time.  Maybe Mike H. can give you some techweenie instructions though, he 
seemed to be able to figure it out.

brews
63.2797CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Sep 09 1996 16:441
I'm sure that if Brews was involved, it was just a_innocent college prank.
63.2798PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Mon Sep 09 1996 17:081
    You have to be smarter than a computer to figure it out.
63.2799ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Sep 09 1996 17:285
    
    Lets see... corporate noting policy broken... moderators reply 
    "it was just a_innocent college prank", got it.  Since I know
    everything is done consistently, that means anything goes.  Thanks
    for the blank check.
63.2800ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Sep 09 1996 17:295
    
    Ron the man is back out of his hole now that the Sox are making a run
    for the playoffs.  Too bad they'll choke and disappoint again. 
    Actually, i'm rooting for the Sox again, so I can get my freebie
    tickets to the playoffs.
63.2801CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Sep 09 1996 17:3333
>    
>    Lets see... corporate noting policy broken... moderators reply 
>    "it was just a_innocent college prank", got it.  Since I know
>    everything is done consistently, that means anything goes.  Thanks
>    for the blank check.
>

Wah....wah.....

Corporate noting policy was NOT broken.  It was not an anonymous account.  
Bruce gave what was, IMO, a legitimate reason for the authorship of his note.

It's a situation which I fear is going to get worse before it gets better.  It
would seem that accounts on VAXes and AXPs are going to be a thing of the past,
from the memos I've been getting.  

Now they're telling me that I'm going to have to use Microsoft Exchange, mainly
because I have a PC in my office.  The fact that I only use it for Word and for
testing some network PC software we write is falling on deaf ears.

So, I think there's going to be more of those way-out "node" strings.


As to the innocent college prank statement, it was a reference to the MrT-like
"I'm leaving" note Bruce put in some time ago....


Now that I've explained far more than I intended to, or even felt was
worthwhile, there you have it....


'Saw

63.2802LOOKING GOOD!!!!! JUST WHAT I WANTED TO SEESUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Sep 13 1996 13:4043
63.2803All the way baby!!!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Sep 17 1996 17:1021
63.2804ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Sep 17 1996 17:112
63.2805'nuf cedBSS::MENDEZTue Sep 17 1996 17:202
63.2806and they still sip!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsTue Sep 17 1996 17:487
63.2807both work for me......PECAD8::CHILDSTue Sep 17 1996 18:505
63.2808ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Sep 18 1996 12:574
63.2809LET THE PLAYOFFS BEGIN!!!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Sep 18 1996 15:217
63.2810TICK T I C K T I C K !SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Sep 24 1996 20:0525
63.2811CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westTue Sep 24 1996 22:5113
63.2812ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Sep 25 1996 00:362
63.2813What's the problem = Head caseSTRATA::BTOWERWed Sep 25 1996 10:562
63.2814SMART2::CHILDSWed Sep 25 1996 11:374
63.2815Indians fans???BSS::MENDEZWed Sep 25 1996 13:463
63.2816WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Sep 25 1996 14:123
63.2817TICK T I C K T I C K ! ! !SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansWed Sep 25 1996 14:156
63.2818ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Sep 25 1996 15:165
63.2819ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Sep 25 1996 15:348
63.2820Belle has reason to worryMKOTS3::BREENWed Sep 25 1996 16:0411
63.2821PECAD8::CHILDSWed Sep 25 1996 16:301
63.2822ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Sep 25 1996 17:178
63.28232543::MAIEWSKIAtlanta Braves, N.L. East ChampsWed Sep 25 1996 17:288
63.2824PECAD8::CHILDSWed Sep 25 1996 18:076
63.2825ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Sep 25 1996 18:505
63.2826SNAX::ERICKSONThu Sep 26 1996 13:476
63.28272nd year in a row!!! CHAMPIONS!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Sep 30 1996 16:4525
63.2828ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Sep 30 1996 17:113
63.2829ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Sep 30 1996 17:134
63.2830ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Sep 30 1996 17:362
63.2831ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Oct 01 1996 16:153
63.2832HOW ABOUT SOME SCORES AND UPDATES...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Oct 01 1996 18:1930
63.2833ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Oct 01 1996 18:194
63.2834Lovin' it...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 01 1996 18:369
63.2835WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Oct 01 1996 18:423
63.2836PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Tue Oct 01 1996 18:593
63.2837ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Oct 01 1996 19:038
63.2838score please...SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Oct 01 1996 19:1816
63.2839Down to the wire...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 01 1996 19:2031
63.2840tick, t i c k, TICK, T I C K, T I C K ! !SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Oct 01 1996 19:2820
63.2841TICK T I C K T I C K T I C KSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Oct 01 1996 19:446
63.28429-3 BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOTue Oct 01 1996 19:536
63.2843SALEM::DODAOut of my mind, back in 5 minutesTue Oct 01 1996 19:541
63.2844WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Oct 01 1996 19:543
63.2845SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansTue Oct 01 1996 20:017
63.2846BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOTue Oct 01 1996 20:024
63.2847ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RTue Oct 01 1996 20:164
63.2848After 7.5MOVMON::DAVISTue Oct 01 1996 20:2893
63.2849PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Tue Oct 01 1996 21:415
63.2850ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Oct 01 1996 23:392
63.2851Good timing GlennROCK::GRONOWSKITue Oct 01 1996 23:392
63.2852EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 01 1996 23:478
63.2853GO ORIOLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!STRATA::BTOWERWed Oct 02 1996 11:282
63.2854ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Oct 02 1996 12:078
63.2855ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 02 1996 12:3810
63.2856figured i'd enter chappy's reply for himROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 02 1996 12:423
63.2857NQOS01::nqsrv137.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchWed Oct 02 1996 12:583
63.2858I hope the Birds drop another one on em.STRATA::BTOWERWed Oct 02 1996 13:104
63.2859CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Oct 02 1996 13:1210
63.2860ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 02 1996 14:262
63.2861CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Oct 02 1996 14:558
63.2862Deer in the headlights...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 02 1996 15:099
63.2863ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 02 1996 15:563
63.2864PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Wed Oct 02 1996 16:141
63.2865CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Oct 02 1996 17:548
63.28661-0 after 1BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOWed Oct 02 1996 18:168
63.2867top of 3BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOWed Oct 02 1996 18:298
63.2868Brady goes yard, again...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 02 1996 19:0827
63.2869ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 02 1996 19:182
63.2870My hero Cal comes through again-- Indians sweating...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 02 1996 19:2129
63.2871Double, Indian-reject Murray, make it 4-0EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 02 1996 19:231
63.2872WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Oct 02 1996 19:243
63.2873MSBCS::BRYDIETastes like chickenWed Oct 02 1996 19:257
63.2874BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOWed Oct 02 1996 19:304
63.2875Not so fast-- Albert strikes! 4-3 O'sEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 02 1996 19:386
63.2876any more updates???BSS::MENDEZWed Oct 02 1996 20:271
63.2877ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Oct 02 1996 20:295
63.2878ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Oct 02 1996 20:342
63.2879ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Oct 02 1996 20:342
63.2880ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 02 1996 21:122
63.2881O's up 2-0CSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Wed Oct 02 1996 21:141
63.2882SUBPAC::SKALSKIA reclined state of mindWed Oct 02 1996 21:149
63.2883MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Wed Oct 02 1996 21:157
63.2884looks bleak...BSS::MENDEZWed Oct 02 1996 21:454
63.2885SNAX::ERICKSONWed Oct 02 1996 21:5023
63.2886Next 3 in the JakeFABSIX::J_PAGEWed Oct 02 1996 21:512
63.2887ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 02 1996 22:0131
63.2888ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 02 1996 23:533
63.2889PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Thu Oct 03 1996 02:1216
63.2890That #$%^!! fat lady can get lost ;-)IROCZ::BKWALThu Oct 03 1996 10:384
63.2891Could be the gag of the centuryLUDWIG::BTOWERThu Oct 03 1996 11:233
63.2892SWEEP SWEEP SWEEP now dump them in the trash can.LUDWIG::BTOWERThu Oct 03 1996 11:332
63.2893Not quite yet...FABSIX::J_PAGEThu Oct 03 1996 12:167
63.2894EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 03 1996 12:516
63.2895ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 03 1996 13:002
63.2896Parade in Baltimore by MondaySTRATA::BTOWERThu Oct 03 1996 13:112
63.2897fat lady is getting readyPHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Thu Oct 03 1996 14:371
63.2898we can do it!!!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Oct 03 1996 15:0726
63.2899Indians clutching at excuses now...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 03 1996 15:2116
63.2900PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Thu Oct 03 1996 15:2917
63.2901SNAX::ERICKSONThu Oct 03 1996 15:307
63.2902ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 03 1996 15:358
63.2903BIGQ::MCKAYThu Oct 03 1996 16:436
63.2904THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE HOME!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansThu Oct 03 1996 16:4727
63.2905why coitainlyBSS::MENDEZThu Oct 03 1996 17:343
63.2906Excuses starting already???BIGQ::WESTKevin 225-4528 HLOThu Oct 03 1996 18:0711
63.2907ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Oct 03 1996 22:222
63.2908Lots of funFABSIX::R_LUCHT&quot;Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof&quot;Fri Oct 04 1996 04:448
63.2909Life is sooo unfair, huh groaner?FABSIX::E_MAXWELLThe torture never stops...Fri Oct 04 1996 06:5811
63.2910Is that a street sweeper I hear or what?STRATA::BTOWERFri Oct 04 1996 13:172
63.2911EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Oct 04 1996 13:196
63.2912WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Oct 04 1996 14:033
63.2913SNAX::ERICKSONFri Oct 04 1996 14:092
63.2914CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIAtlanta Braves, N.L. East ChampsFri Oct 04 1996 14:215
63.2915Oriole or Crow?STRATA::BTOWERFri Oct 04 1996 14:3710
63.2916ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Oct 04 1996 14:375
63.2917ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Oct 04 1996 14:372
63.2918PECAD8::CHILDSFri Oct 04 1996 14:455
63.2919PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Fri Oct 04 1996 14:573
63.2920that's all you need to know MikeROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Oct 04 1996 14:592
63.2921PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Fri Oct 04 1996 15:001
63.2922Now how about apologizing to the leagueROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Oct 04 1996 15:092
63.2923WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Oct 04 1996 15:283
63.2924MSBCS::BRYDIETastes like chickenFri Oct 04 1996 16:0918
63.2925Sit on it, Potsie!SHARE::DERRYColor me impressed...Fri Oct 04 1996 16:351
63.2926ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Oct 04 1996 17:183
63.2927SALEM::DODAOut of my mind, back in 5 minutesFri Oct 04 1996 17:216
63.2928CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIAtlanta Braves, N.L. East ChampsFri Oct 04 1996 18:3412
63.2929Baltimore Nasty'sSTRATA::BTOWERFri Oct 04 1996 18:393
63.2930TICK T I C K T I C KSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Oct 04 1996 18:452
63.2931STRATA::BTOWERFri Oct 04 1996 18:481
63.2932zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzPUTSTRATA::BTOWERFri Oct 04 1996 18:502
63.2933ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Oct 04 1996 18:593
63.2934ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Oct 04 1996 19:004
63.2935BummerYIELD::BARBIERISun Oct 06 1996 13:5118
63.2936ROCK::GRONOWSKISun Oct 06 1996 15:472
63.2937tun-22.imc.das.dec.com::dfaustDennis FaustSun Oct 06 1996 22:018
63.2938BAhhhahhahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Oct 07 1996 13:0411
63.2939WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Oct 07 1996 13:1311
63.2940CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Oct 07 1996 13:166
63.2941Enjoy it while you can...it won't last long!CNTROL::SALMONMon Oct 07 1996 13:175
63.2942CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Oct 07 1996 13:2813
63.2943HTH'sWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Oct 07 1996 13:5213
63.2944Which way to the Crow???IROCZ::BKWALMon Oct 07 1996 13:5613
63.2945I'll enjoy it too...but the yankees....CNTROL::SALMONMon Oct 07 1996 14:184
63.2946don't forget to vote for meROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 14:209
63.2947SHARE::DERRYColor me impressed...Mon Oct 07 1996 14:221
63.2948something decent was onHBAHBA::HAASNot A Sane Chap Anywhere 'Round (Racing).Mon Oct 07 1996 14:246
63.2949ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 14:243
63.2950Get a clueCNTROL::SALMONMon Oct 07 1996 14:2511
63.2951"Hi Sid, I'm Bobby the new Poolboy, wanna rub suntan lotion on me?"SMART2::CHILDSMon Oct 07 1996 14:388
63.2952C H O K E . . . SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Oct 07 1996 15:0314
63.2954can you say playoff tickets...I won't!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Oct 07 1996 15:097
63.2955CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Oct 07 1996 15:1219
63.2956There Ought To Be A LawYIELD::BARBIERIMon Oct 07 1996 15:192
63.2957Biggest gag, hack, cough, choke of recent memoryLUDWIG::BTOWERMon Oct 07 1996 15:205
63.2959ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 15:336
63.2960ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 15:353
63.2961SNAX::ERICKSONMon Oct 07 1996 15:359
63.2962ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 15:3915
63.2964ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 16:5510
63.2965MIND BURP.....CHARLES NAGY....SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansMon Oct 07 1996 16:5835
63.2967reality hurtsROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 17:089
63.2972original on file for those who want to see the real senderROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 17:1510
63.2974NQOS01::nqsrv125.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchMon Oct 07 1996 17:215
63.2975ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 17:224
63.2977ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 17:275
63.2979Pardon me whilst I burp.....CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Oct 07 1996 17:3918
63.2980NQOS01::nqsrv125.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchMon Oct 07 1996 17:391
63.2982NQOS01::nqsrv125.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchMon Oct 07 1996 17:5011
63.2983ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Oct 07 1996 18:0018
63.2984ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Oct 07 1996 18:034
63.2985:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Oct 07 1996 18:053
63.2986BIGQ::MCKAYMon Oct 07 1996 18:095
63.2987SALEM::DODAOut of my mind, back in 5 minutesMon Oct 07 1996 18:151
63.2988ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Oct 07 1996 18:194
63.2989WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Oct 07 1996 18:463
63.2990Red I ain't. And BTW when are we getting going?CSLALL::BRULESmoke on the WaterTue Oct 08 1996 12:1611
63.2991the worm turns....MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsTue Oct 08 1996 13:2010
63.2992MSBCS::BRYDIEBen Coates the Princess of TE'sTue Oct 08 1996 16:0914
63.2993ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Oct 08 1996 20:148
63.2994GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Tue Oct 08 1996 21:135
63.2995enjoyROCK::GRONOWSKITue Oct 08 1996 23:562
63.2996MSBCS::BRYDIEBen Coates the Princess of TE'sWed Oct 09 1996 12:4711
63.2997GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Wed Oct 09 1996 13:425
63.2998ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 14:306
63.2999ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 15:003
63.3000PECAD8::CHILDSWed Oct 09 1996 15:106
63.3001MSBCS::BRYDIEBen Coates the Princess of TE'sWed Oct 09 1996 15:1112
63.3002MSBCS::BRYDIEBen Coates the Princess of TE'sWed Oct 09 1996 15:115
63.3003humane except...HBAHBA::HAASNot A Sane Chap Anywhere 'RoundWed Oct 09 1996 15:2112
63.3004ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 15:216
63.3005GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Wed Oct 09 1996 15:234
63.3006BIGQ::MCKAYWed Oct 09 1996 15:297
63.3007ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 15:362
63.3008VMSNET::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 09 1996 15:389
63.3009ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 15:394
63.3010GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Wed Oct 09 1996 16:306
63.3011huh???BSS::MENDEZWed Oct 09 1996 16:453
63.3012ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 17:472
63.3013SNAX::ERICKSONWed Oct 09 1996 17:477
63.3014ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 17:503
63.3015what a bonehead!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsWed Oct 09 1996 18:536
63.3016IMBETR::DUPREZI need a favor, Don Cornelius...Wed Oct 09 1996 19:237
63.3017Veg heads get a life!SALEM::DODAOut of my mind, back in 5 minutesWed Oct 09 1996 19:230
63.3018ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 19:332
63.3019MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsWed Oct 09 1996 20:0410
63.3020ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 20:393
63.3021ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 20:392
63.3022MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsWed Oct 09 1996 20:471
63.3023ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 20:544
63.3024SNAX::ERICKSONWed Oct 09 1996 21:0516
63.3025ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 09 1996 21:097
63.3026a couple of good places to startHBAHBA::HAASNot A Sane Chap Anywhere 'RoundWed Oct 09 1996 21:2912
63.3027CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Oct 10 1996 13:122
63.3028Maybe next year...FABSIX::J_PAGEWed Oct 16 1996 14:267
63.3029'nuff said - city of losersROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 16 1996 14:312
63.3030VMSNET::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 17 1996 17:226
63.3031ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Nov 13 1996 19:197
63.3032WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSWed Nov 13 1996 19:254
63.3033ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Nov 13 1996 19:263
63.3034ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 14 1996 11:0710
63.3035ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 14 1996 11:0810
63.3036ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 14 1996 11:2411
63.3037IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Thu Nov 14 1996 11:287
63.3038ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 14 1996 11:4210
63.3039IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Thu Nov 14 1996 12:0719
63.3040MKOTS3::BREENThu Nov 14 1996 13:096
63.3041IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Thu Nov 14 1996 13:283
63.3042ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 14 1996 13:3417
63.3043EDWIN::WAUGAMANPettitte wuz robbed!Thu Nov 14 1996 13:3415
63.3044ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 14 1996 13:364
63.3045ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Nov 14 1996 13:3712
63.3046ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Nov 14 1996 13:422
63.3047MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Thu Nov 14 1996 13:5513
63.3048Why are you grinning?EDWIN::WAUGAMANPettitte wuz robbed!Thu Nov 14 1996 14:069
63.3049ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 14 1996 14:119
63.3050CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Nov 14 1996 14:258
63.3051USA Today...SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Thu Nov 14 1996 14:5034
63.3052ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Nov 14 1996 17:114
63.3053IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Thu Nov 14 1996 17:232
63.3054Ah, the fantasies of the wannabees...POWDML::GARBARINOThu Nov 14 1996 18:5612
63.3055Indians are very potent even without BelleTNPUBS::NAZZAROWelcome back, NBA!Thu Nov 14 1996 19:0817
63.3056CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Nov 14 1996 19:5416
63.3057TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Nov 14 1996 20:0642
63.3058POWDML::GARBARINOFri Nov 15 1996 12:0510
63.3059ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Nov 15 1996 12:2329
63.3060ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Nov 15 1996 13:1410
63.3061MKOTS3::BREENFri Nov 15 1996 13:273
63.3062WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSFri Nov 15 1996 15:277
63.3063POWDML::GARBARINOFri Nov 15 1996 17:4810
63.3064have a clueROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Nov 15 1996 17:574
63.3065MSBCS::BRYDIETastes like chicken.Fri Nov 15 1996 18:106
63.3066Or Pinky Higgins his earlier personaMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Nov 15 1996 18:2811
63.3067ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Nov 15 1996 18:3413
63.3068MSBCS::BRYDIETastes like chicken.Fri Nov 15 1996 18:405
63.3069Sans Mentir, si votre plummageMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Nov 15 1996 18:488
63.3070ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Nov 15 1996 18:554
63.3071IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Fri Nov 15 1996 19:364
63.3072ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Nov 15 1996 19:3930
63.3073Let Belle Go And Buy A PitcherYIELD::BARBIERISun Nov 17 1996 19:339
63.3074CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Nov 18 1996 12:0222
63.3075Mais nonEDWIN::WAUGAMANPettitte wuz robbed!Mon Nov 18 1996 12:0611
63.3076ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Nov 18 1996 13:292
63.3077Big Frank and Fat Albert?EDWIN::WAUGAMANPettitte wuz robbed!Mon Nov 18 1996 16:1712
63.3078PCBUOA::MORGANMon Nov 18 1996 16:183
63.3079$50M, $60M, $70M...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPettitte wuz robbed!Mon Nov 18 1996 16:206
63.3080CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Nov 18 1996 19:3610
63.3081Belle Stays Close to ClevelandYIELD::BARBIERIMon Nov 18 1996 19:391
63.3082NQOS01::nqsrv145.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchTue Nov 19 1996 01:225
63.3083hmmmmm.....POWDML::GARBARINOTue Nov 19 1996 16:162
63.3084Cleveland still the favoriteTNPUBS::NAZZAROWelcome back, NBA!Tue Nov 19 1996 16:247
63.3085ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Nov 19 1996 16:276
63.3086He's thereEDWIN::WAUGAMANHappy b-day Kevin my mainTue Nov 19 1996 16:3310
63.3087Jerry "do as I say, not as I do" ReinsdorfTNPUBS::NAZZAROWelcome back, NBA!Tue Nov 19 1996 18:315
63.3088Still two msGIADEV::BREENTue Nov 19 1996 18:526
63.3089ROCK::GRONOWSKITue Nov 19 1996 19:472
63.3090BIG PAINCNTROL::KINGWed Nov 20 1996 10:582
63.3091TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Nov 20 1996 11:1823
63.3092A very rich manEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Nov 20 1996 12:1214
63.3093TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Nov 20 1996 12:3512
63.3094Owners at it againODIXIE::ZOGRANNo directions neededWed Nov 20 1996 12:4415
63.3095ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Nov 20 1996 13:202
63.3096ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Nov 20 1996 13:204
63.3097POWDML::GARBARINOWed Nov 20 1996 13:335
63.3098ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Nov 20 1996 13:495
63.3099SNAX::ERICKSONWed Nov 27 1996 16:426
63.3100EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Nov 27 1996 16:4811
63.3101hey, if Jeff Kent has played second...IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Wed Nov 27 1996 16:544
63.3102ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Nov 27 1996 17:3511
63.3103Jay Bell is a different storyPTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Wed Nov 27 1996 18:163
63.3104Bank thisMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Nov 27 1996 18:432
63.3105ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Nov 27 1996 19:0413
63.3106MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Nov 27 1996 19:138
63.3107EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Nov 27 1996 19:1812
63.3108ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Nov 27 1996 19:553
63.3109PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm (412)829-0710Mon Dec 02 1996 15:4015
63.3110ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Dec 02 1996 16:034
63.3111ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Dec 02 1996 16:3946
63.3112ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Dec 02 1996 18:526
63.3113Hopeful that Rocket Roger also staysSTRATA::GARRYDallas Cowboys Champs AgainFri Dec 13 1996 02:196
63.3114ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Dec 13 1996 11:138
63.3115CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Dec 13 1996 11:4814
63.3116speed killsROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Dec 19 1996 13:232
63.3117Indians' projected starters...SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Thu Dec 19 1996 14:2710
63.3118Valentin an Indian? Nah...SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Thu Dec 19 1996 14:3112
63.3119ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Dec 19 1996 14:5412
63.3120MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Dec 19 1996 17:464
63.3121ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Dec 30 1996 11:424
63.3122ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 06 1997 14:066
63.3123MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manMon Jan 06 1997 14:166
63.3124same old byrd shitROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 06 1997 16:554
63.3125YIELD::BARBIERIMon Jan 06 1997 18:142
63.3126MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manMon Jan 06 1997 18:528
63.3127PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Mon Jan 06 1997 19:561
63.3128from USA TodaySALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Thu Jan 30 1997 15:0118
    CLEVELAND - Albert Belle and Carlos Baerga are already members of the
    Cleveland Indians'
    alumni club. Will Kenny Lofton join them as ex-Indians? Cleveland
    general manager John Hart said
    that Lofton's agent has informed the team that baseball's top leadoff
    man will file for free agency
    when his contact expires after the coming season. "He said he still
    wanted to talk to us, but he also
    said he was going to test the free-agent waters," said Hart, who also
    noted that the Indians want to
    keep Lofton. Lofton will earn $4.75 million in 1997. Lofton has won
    five straight stolen base
    crowns, averaged 108 runs the last five seasons and captured four
    consecutive Gold Gloves.
    Former teammates Belle signed the richest contract in baseball history
    (five years, $55 million) with
    the White Sox this offseason and the Indians traded Baerga to the Mets
    last summer. 
63.3129PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Thu Jan 30 1997 15:323
    Rumor has it that Lofton and several others want to return to Arizona
    to play for the D'backs.  '97 is supposed to have a bumper crop of
    FA's.
63.3130Bye-bye KennyALFSS2::TAYLOR_DHang On, SloopyMon Feb 10 1997 15:25216
Hart's move has Lofton looking like the bad guy
    
GM turns tables by announcing center fielder's 
wish to become free agent
    
By Sheldon Ocker
Beacon Journal sports writer

February 2, 1997

John Hart believed he was asking a simple,
straightforward question that called for a
response in kind.
   
"What will it take to keep Kenny in
Cleveland?" the Indians' general manager
reportedly asked Steve Zucker, the agent for
center fielder Kenny Lofton.

How about $7 million a year? What about $8
million? More? Hart pressed the issue. Zucker
had no answer, but his lack of a reply spoke
volumes.

Zucker didn't want to talk about it, because
Lofton was looking forward to becoming a free
agent -- and probably walking away from the
Indians.

Hart took the hint. He is tired of being the
fall guy in this winter's Free Agent Follies.
He made an honest effort to land John Smoltz,
Alex Fernandez, Tim Naehring, Ryne Sandberg
and Roger Clemens, yet he came up empty.

Enough.

This was not a case of mismanaged
negotiations by Hart. He had offered millions
upon millions of dollars; he had taken
players on guided tours of Cleveland; he had
fed them at the best restaurants and checked
out school systems for their children.

And he had come oh so close. Fernandez even
said yes. But Hart's efforts were sabotaged
by the pitcher's wife and in-laws, who
persuaded him to return home to Miami.

The real problem: Hart was chasing players he
had no chance of signing and was taking the
heat because he had failed, a result that had
been inevitable.

Now came Lofton, whose silence was a portent
of more bad news. So before word spread that
Hart was being a cheapskate with Dick Jacobs'
money. ...

Before the talk show hosts could ask, "Is
Hart really trying?" ...

Before Hart was put on the defensive and
forced to justify his methods, he went on the
attack.

He let the cat out of the bag. He informed
the media that Lofton would opt for free
agency after the 1997 season. He indicated
that negotiations have been virtually
nonexistent, because Lofton declined to
delineate his objectives.

Hart didn't place blame, but he sure did
shift the burden of responsibility. Zucker
probably lost his lunch when he found out.
The last thing he needed was to have his
client transformed into Alger Hiss.

In an instant, Hart turned his center fielder
into just another greedy player looking for
the big score. So Cleveland wasn't good
enough for Lofton anymore. Many talk show
callers viewed him as nothing less than a
traitor.

During halftime of the Cavaliers-Knicks game
Wednesday night, Lofton's image was flashed
on the Gund Arena telescreen. Thousands
booed. To my knowledge, this has happened
only twice before, when the faces of Art
Modell and Bill Belichick appeared on the
giant television monitor.

Did Lofton belong in the company of these
local villains? Hart had put him there.

More than one kind of game is played at
Jacobs Field. If Lofton didn't know it
before, he will find out as the season wears
on. Fans still will cheer his doubles in the
gap and his spectacular leaping catches, but
he will be watched closely for signs of
creeping selfishness.

Conventional wisdom dictates that Lofton will
play his butt off in the hopes of breaking
the bank once free agency kicks in. But he
will not get a free ride from the fans.

Customers constantly will wonder if Lofton
refused to steal a base for fear of getting
hurt. They will test his congeniality with
endless questions about the future. He will
be viewed with the faintest hint of suspicion
by people who never before questioned his
motives.

This might not wear well with Lofton. He is
not a man given to perspective. As some
executives in the Indians' organization say,
"Kenny has his opinions."

If Lofton is challenged, he will snap back.
If he is doubted, he will defend himself.
From where he stands, he is doing nothing
wrong.

Every player has the right to explore free
agency when the time comes. If Lofton wants
to play for the expansion Diamondbacks or bat
leadoff for the Dodgers, why shouldn't he
pursue his dreams?

It's cold in Cleveland. Haven't you seen
Lofton's neck wrapped in wool, taking batting
practice in a ski cap before wintry night
games?

Every man has a right to be warm, doesn't he?
The rules say Lofton can deal with any team
that courts him when his contract expires in
the fall. True enough. He won't get an
argument from me.

But explain that to Cleveland fans who waited
nine hours in the dead of winter for bleacher
seats to a game against the Twins. No matter
what Lofton says -- if he says anything -- it
will sound like a lame excuse by a player
with a runaway ego.

Which brings up a more pressing issue. How
can a team that sells out the entire season
to its adoring fans and is located in a city
with a newly won upbeat reputation lose its
two best players to free agency?

Is this still about a Cleveland that once
went bankrupt and whose river caught on fire
20 years ago? Will the Indians ever reach a
point where the players they nurture to
superstardom elect to stick around?

Or is this solely about the personalities and
appetites of Albert Belle, who fled to
Chicago, and Lofton, who is more likely to go
than to stay?

Having known both players since they arrived
in Cleveland, I would have been surprised had
they elected to pass up free agency.

Belle never made a secret of the fact he is
motivated by money. Don't knock it. Belle's
burning quest for the matchless contract is
one factor in his incredible drive and focus.

It makes him a better player, if not a kinder
and gentler person. Not long before Belle
signed with the White Sox, a former player
who knows Belle said, "Albert will go with
the team that offers him 10 cents more."

If it's only a question of money, Lofton
still might end up in Cleveland. After all,
the game isn't over yet. But it's unlikely
that Northeast Ohio can satisfy Lofton's
long-term lifestyle goals.

Lofton likes warm weather. Though raised near
Chicago, he lives in Tucson. He also loves
the spotlight of celebrity. On occasions when
a film star or rock singer shows up in the
Tribe clubhouse, Lofton is the first to greet
him.

Two years ago, Kevin Costner attended a game
at Jacobs Field. Afterward, he visited the
clubhouse. When Lofton saw the actor, his mad
dash to welcome him almost knocked Costner to
the floor.

So unless global warming suddenly turns Lake
Erie into the Gulf of Mexico or the film
industry decides to relocate near Public
Square, the Indians will be at a distinct
disadvantage in trying to keep Lofton.

But take heart, Tribe fans. There probably
are superstars out there who love April
snowstorms and think Dick Goddard is every
bit as renowned as Sly Stallone.

All John Hart has to do is find them.
    
63.3131EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Feb 10 1997 15:546
    The Indians better win it all this year, or they're in danger of
    becoming the latest Dynasty that Never Was (Even Close)...
    
    glenn
    
63.313224 hours to acceptMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Feb 10 1997 18:112
    I hereby offer on behalf of Dan Duquette Cordero,Valentin and Wakefield
    for Kenny.
63.3133IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Feb 10 1997 18:324
    I could turn that deal down in 5 seconds if I were Cleveland.
    
    Actually, it only takes 1 second to hang up a phone...
    
63.3134MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Feb 10 1997 18:495
    Surprisingly I don't believe the Redsox would make the offer except for
    the money angle.  From a strict baseball point of view and including
    the view that Lofton is gone anyway I would think they'd look this
    offer over.  The problem in reality is the three salaries involved for
    the Sox trio, way too high (5-6 million).
63.3135EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Feb 10 1997 18:5312
    
>    From a strict baseball point of view and including
>    the view that Lofton is gone anyway I would think they'd look this
>    offer over.  The problem in reality is the three salaries involved for
>    the Sox trio, way too high (5-6 million).
    
    There's no "problem" in reality.  The Indians want to win this year.
    Acquiring a bum like Wakefield would work against that purpose (and 
    they don't need Cordero, nor Valentin for the most part).
    
    glenn
    
63.3136from SportslineSALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Tue Feb 11 1997 14:35157
    Cleveland Indians
    
    INSIDE PITCH: 
    
    What the Indians have now, officially, is an independent contractor in
    center field. 
    
    Oh sure, technically he's still a member of the team. But not really.
    Not now. He's no longer a
    member of the nucleus of the Cleveland Indians. He is now, by choice, a
    mercenary. 
    
    An independent contractor. 
    
    The roadrunner is a lame duck. 
    
    Kenny Lofton is no longer playing for the hearts and minds of Indians
    fans. Nor is he playing, in the
    strictest sense of the word, for the town or the team. In 1997, he's
    playing for himself, thank you.
    For Numero Uno. Kenny Lofton is playing for Kenny Lofton this year, and
    no one else. Then he's
    outta here. 
    
    For 162 games this season, Lofton will wear an Indians uniform and use
    all the Indians' facilities in
    order to market himself to the best of his ability to whichever team he
    intends to jump to in 1998. 
    
    The only question that remains is whether the opening day sellout at
    Jacobs Field will cheer him or
    boo him. 
    
    Unlike the Albert Belle tango of a year ago, where the "will they or
    won't they'' charade was at least
    carried on to opening day, Lofton has pulled the plug early on any
    hopes Indians officials had of
    employing him beyond 1997. 
    
    Lofton has told club officials that he does not want to negotiate a new
    contract, and that he intends
    to test the free agent waters following the 1997 season. By doing so,
    the most electrifying player
    perhaps in the history of the franchise is willingly evicting himself
    from what was supposed to be one
    of baseball's elite addresses. 
    
    But don't cry for him, Ashtabula. 
    
    And shed no tears for the Indians, either. Tribe officials are big
    boys, and they have already come to
    terms with the fact that, in consecutive years, they are likely going
    to lose the greatest left fielder and
    the greatest leadoff hitter in the history of the franchise. 
    
    "Welcome to baseball in the 90s,'' said Indians general manager John
    Hart. "We don't like it, but
    we've got to deal with it.'' 
    
    Hart admits he was left scratching his head when told by Steve Zucker,
    Lofton's agent, that No.7
    wants to cut bait with the Indians after this year. 
    
    "We knew this was going to be a bumpy ride with Kenny,'' Hart said. "So
    I'm disappointed, but not
    shocked.'' 
    
    The Indians never even got a chance to make an offer. 
    
    "We made some overtures on where we would like to take Kenny,'' Hart
    said. "But before we even
    got out of the gate, Zucker said that Kenny wants to test the market.
    That he doesn't want to
    negotiate.'' 
    
    What exactly is Lofton looking for? 
    
    Don't ask Hart. 
    
    "We've got a great ballpark, a full house every night, we win. We have
    all the criteria you'd like to
    have,'' Hart said. "We haven't gotten dumb overnight. What our fans
    have to understand is that in
    some cases like this, there isn't a lot a club can do.'' 
    
    If Lofton leaves, he would become the fifth starter from the 1995
    American League champions to
    disappear. The others: Belle, Carlos Baerga, Eddie Murray, and Paul
    Sorrento. What do the
    Indians have to show for the loss of those five players? 
    
    Matt Williams. 
    
    Hart now says he saw this day coming. 
    
    "We knew we had a lot of star players, and we signed them to multi-year
    contracts to bring stability
    to this franchise for the first time in 40 years,'' he said. "To keep
    those players, we felt the industry
    had to change. It hasn't. And we can't control that. Therefore, it's
    tougher to hang on to big-time
    star players, unless they have a degree of loyalty.'' 
    
    Belle had none. Lofton looks like he has none. Baerga, Murray, and
    Sorrento were let go willingly. 
    
    "In a way, we're the victims of our own success,'' Hart said. "We have
    not had any contract
    squabbles at all. Now, the 90s are catching up to us.'' 
    
    So what's Hart's next move? Trade Lofton? 
    
    Don't count on it. 
    
    Lofton has no greater incentive to produce a career year than the fact
    that he will become a free
    agent at the end of the season. If Lofton is going to use the Indians
    to market himself to one of their
    rivals, why shouldn't the Indians use him to make one more run at the
    World Series with this core
    group of players? 
    
    "I harbor no desire to trade Kenny,'' Hart said. "If we didn't already
    have a good club, I might look
    more closely at a trade. I will say I'm more inclined to look at it now
    than I was a week ago. But it's
    hard to trade a guy in his free agent year.'' 
    
    Call him an idealist, but as Rome crumbles around him -- he, of course,
    would dispute that -- Hart
    is waxing philosophical. 
    
    "This is a cyclical deal,'' he said. "You want to stay a contender
    every year. And we hope to. It just
    may not be with the same cast.'' 
    
    Translation: goodbye Lofton, hello Chad Curtis? 
    
    Ouch 
    
    NOTES, QUOTES, ANECDOTES: 
    
    If Lofton does leave, the Indians' cupboard is bare. 
    
    It's as simple as that. 
    
    While the Indians' farm system is well stocked with pitchers, first and
    third basemen, and left and
    right fielders, when it comes to center fielders, forget it. 
    
    "We're not going to kid ourselves. We have nobody in our system with
    the impact skills in center
    field of a Kenny Lofton,'' said Tribe farm director Mark Shapiro. "We
    have guys who can play
    center field, but none of them are projected to have the impact at the
    major league level of a
    Lofton.'' 
63.3137NQOS01::nqsrv418.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchInside IntelTue Feb 11 1997 15:302
Word here is that Lofton is looking at the D'backs.
63.3138EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Mar 25 1997 12:579
    Bombshell trade this morning (according to CNN): Dave Justice, Marquis
    Grissom to the Indians for Kenny Lofton, Alan Embree.
    
    Can't like this if I'm an Indians fan...
    
    
    glenn
    
63.3139CSLALL::BRULESpring Training is hereTue Mar 25 1997 13:025
    	Glenn Why?  Lofton and Grissom I think is a wash. Lofton was
    supposedly gone at the end of the year. If Justice is healthy this is a
    hell of an addition.
    
    Mike
63.3140Heard a different one this a.m.ODIXIE::ZOGRANregnaD kciN, my heroTue Mar 25 1997 13:046
    Was going to enter a Grissom and Lemke (Indians need a 2B?) for Lofton
    trade rumor in here earlier.  Don't know much about Embree except he's
    a lefty reliever?  If he's any good at all he will be a welcome addition to
    an anemic Braves bullpen. 
                                                  
    UMDan
63.3141ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Mar 25 1997 13:099
    
    He could be good, but it's not clear yet.
    
    I'm stunned.  I'm not fond of the idea of Grissom leading off - his
    assests are more in the way of power than OBP, though Lofton's been
    slipping in that department the past couple of years.  I like Justice,
    but he doesn't really help much - Giles can play.
    
    Joe
63.3142Can Marguis, Justice make it in the bigs?MKOTS3::BREENFrom Thurs to SundayTue Mar 25 1997 13:319
    Fantastic move for Atlanta.  Illustrates more than ever why they're at
    the top.  Lofton is a whole step above Grissom.  It'd be nice if they
    can sign him.
    
    As with most trades despite helping Atlanta immensely it's probably to
    the Indians benefit too.
    
    I'm wary of National League stats repeating in the A.L. - should I be
    Joe from what you can tell?
63.3143It's officialODIXIE::ZOGRANAny day now....Tue Mar 25 1997 13:3310
    Just heard on the radio that it's a done deal - Lofton and Embree for
    Grissom and Justice.
    
    3 free agents after this year - Glavine, Maddux and Lofton, can you say
    
    "Show me the money!"
    
    Hot dogs are gonna cost $15 next year if they re-sign all 3.
    
    UMDan
63.3144ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Mar 25 1997 13:4224
    
>    Fantastic move for Atlanta.  Illustrates more than ever why they're at
>    the top.  Lofton is a whole step above Grissom.  It'd be nice if they
>    can sign him.
 
    I'm not certain about the whole step - Lofton isn't taking walks like
    he used to.  It's not at all a bad move for Atlanta, though, _if_ they
    can keep Lofton.
       
>    As with most trades despite helping Atlanta immensely it's probably to
>    the Indians benefit too.
 
    I'm not certain of this - it only helps Cleveland if Justice is
    noticably better than Giles, and I'm not convinced he will be.
       
>    I'm wary of National League stats repeating in the A.L. - should I be
>    Joe from what you can tell?
    
    Not particularly - given the park effects involved, Lofton's stats
    might improve a bit (though his AB will likely go down), and Justice's
    and Grissom's slip a bit on a per-AB basis.
    
    Joe
    
63.3145Grat move for ClevelandTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass in 1998 - Final Four!Tue Mar 25 1997 14:237
    I think this is a great move for Cleveland.  They get one of the best
    CF in the game and a good RF for a guy who didn't want to be in
    Cleveland and a middle reliever.  Lofton surely was gonna leave at the
    end of the year and the Indians would have received nothing.  Seems to
    me like the Indians salvaged their season with this deal.
    
    NAZZ
63.3146Homer DomeBRLLNT::LONGTaxation without representationTue Mar 25 1997 14:275
    Since Lofton will now get to play at Coors "Park Effect" Park
    his numbers will most assuredly improve.  :^)
    
    
    billl
63.3147PECAD8::CHILDSTue Mar 25 1997 16:235
why would Atlanta do the deal if they didn't feel they could resign Lofton?
Unless they plan to cut him loose at the end of the year to free up money
for Glavine and Maddux........

mike
63.3148A one year and done acquisitionTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass in 1998 - Final Four!Tue Mar 25 1997 16:273
    Exactly.
    
    NAZZ
63.3149Fans give thumbs upODIXIE::ZOGRANAny day now....Tue Mar 25 1997 17:2512
    Listening to the radio at lunch all the talking heads seemed to be in
    favor of the trade, along with the fans calling in.  The big concern
    IS the fact that Lofton will be a FA after this year, and that a great
    year could get him what, $7 - 10 mil/per?  Along with Maddux, Glavine
    and Klesko the Braves will be looking at big bucks to keep these folks
    around.

    The sleeper seems to be Embree.  If he comes around he'll be a real
    asset to the Braves, who are bringing up 17 pitchers for the exhibition
    games this weekend against the Yankmee's.

    UMDan
63.3150SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Tue Mar 25 1997 17:349
    I think the Braves were quite happy to move Justice's salary elsewhere. 
    It may be a calculated risk with keeping Lofton.  Maybe they're only
    renting his services for a season.  So at the end of the season,
    depending on how the Braves do, he may well decide to opt the free
    agent route.  If the Braves win the World Series, I think he'll be gone
    for sure, taking the biggest offer a-la-Belle.  I'd be only slighlty
    surprised if he took something less to play for Phoenix.
    
    	Ted
63.3151OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportTue Mar 25 1997 17:563
    
    Altanta is the second launching pad of the National league. Lofton
    will benefit from playing half of his games in Atlanta also.
63.3152ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Mar 25 1997 18:414
    
    Yup - some raw stats will suffer from fewer AB, though.
    
    Joe
63.3153CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Mar 25 1997 18:4711
  This looks like a good deal for both sides. The Braves didn't need five
outfielders so trading one for a pitcher makes sense. As for the Indians, they
did need an extra outfielder to fill the hole left when Belle signed with
Chicago. 

  As for next year these teams shouldn't really give a rip. When you got teams
as good as those you should go for the win, do what ever it takes. There are
no guarantees and either team could fall apart next year with players
getting old, not signing, who knows what else.

  George
63.3154ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Mar 25 1997 18:507
>As for the Indians, they
>did need an extra outfielder to fill the hole left when Belle signed with
>Chicago. 
    
    No, they didn't - they already had one (Giles).
    
    Joe
63.3155MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Mar 25 1997 18:536
    
    >> The Braves didn't need five outfielders so trading one for a pitcher 
    >> makes sense.
    
       The Braves traded Justice and Grissom for Embree? What was Lofton?
       A throw-in? 
63.3156MKOTS3::BREENFrom Thurs to SundayTue Mar 25 1997 19:017
    He's subscribing to the afore mentioned view that Lofton for Grissom is
    a wash which simply isn't true.  I think it's precisely that upgrade
    that the Braves feel they need to win a World Series this year,
    something they won't accept anything less than.
    
    Plus the salaries of Grissom and Justice are probably greater than
    Lofton's.
63.3157CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Mar 25 1997 19:1723
RE            <<< Note 63.3155 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>    >> The Braves didn't need five outfielders so trading one for a pitcher 
>    >> makes sense.                                       ===
>    
>       The Braves traded Justice and Grissom for Embree? What was Lofton?
>       A throw-in? 

  Use all five fingers Tommy.

  The Braves had 5 outfielders. That's one extra if you figure Klesko will
platoon with either Andruw Jones or Dye.

  So they trade two outfielders for one outfielder and a pitcher

    5 - 2 = 3
    3 + 1 = 4

  As I said, they traded one outfielder for a pitcher. Trading the other
outfielder for another outfielder makes no change in the net number of
outfielders.

  George
63.3158Indians moving from greatness to goodness, imoEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Mar 25 1997 19:4118
                                              
>    Plus the salaries of Grissom and Justice are probably greater than
>    Lofton's.
    
    They are.  The Indians take on more payroll, but have Grissom and
    Justice for two more years instead of Lofton's one.  But for the 
    1997 season, I think they take a hit, as Lofton is better than 
    Grissom and the performance and/or need for Justice is more 
    questionable.
    
    All of this is just another step in the piecemeal demolition (by choice 
    or force) of that great Indians core trio of Baerga, Belle and Lofton.
    They're all gone now.  If Cleveland ever wins its championship it's 
    with a vastly different team than the one that lost the 1995 World 
    Series.  That's kind of a shame, in a way.
    
    glenn
    
63.3159Not over yet?ODIXIE::ZOGRANAny day now....Tue Mar 25 1997 19:597
    When's Groaner gonna weigh in with his enlightened opinion on this turn
    of events?
    
    More rumors down here that this is not the last trade to be made by the
    Braves (McGriff and Lemke?) before the season starts.
    
    UMDan
63.3160Here's an offerMKOTS3::BREENFrom Thurs to SundayTue Mar 25 1997 20:056
    Dan, I'll trade you Vaughn and Valentin for McGriff, Lemke and Glavine.
    I'll even throw in Cordero for similar riffraff on your team like an
    outfielder.
    
    Surprisingly I think the Braves would do that in a heartbeat but not
    the Redsox.
63.3161Wheelin' and Dealin'ODIXIE::ZOGRANAny day now....Tue Mar 25 1997 20:135
    Take Glavine out of the picture and I'll start drawing up the papers. 
    If you want Glavine give up Garciaparra (and I'll throw in Blauser 'cause
    I'm such a nice guy:-)                       
    
    UMDan
63.3162ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backWed Mar 26 1997 00:0822
    
    Lofton is much better than Grissom.  Defense may be a wash, but Lofton
    is a much better lead-off hitter and can he distrupt a team in a series
    - he stole a run in the pivotal Mariners game.  Grissom will hit and
    steal some bases, but this is a net loss for cleveland.  
    
    On the Justice front though, i disagree with Joe.  Justice is a better
    player than Giles, who has yet to prove anything.  He hit .355 last
    year in limited playing time - big deal.  Question is, now what does
    Cleveland do?  Another deal is likely.  They are loaded with offensive
    players and need more pitchers.  Mitchell, Giles and Curtis as the
    back-up outfielders (that outfield is as good as the starting trio on
    many teams) and Seitzer on the bench as well.
    
    A trade for pitching is on the way, i hope its not Justice though, and
    that is the rumor Joe heard.  
    
    Embree has the potential, but has not shown it... here's a guy who's a
    starter in the minors, throws 92-93, blows out his shoulder, has
    surgery and comes back throwing 96-97, but he's not put it together
    yet.
    
63.3163POWDML::GARBARINOWed Mar 26 1997 16:0224
>    All of this is just another step in the piecemeal demolition (by choice 
>    or force) of that great Indians core trio of Baerga, Belle and Lofton.
>    They're all gone now.  If Cleveland ever wins its championship it's 
>    with a vastly different team than the one that lost the 1995 World 
>    Series.  That's kind of a shame, in a way.

My thoughts exactly, Glenn.  And the chgs are much deeper than that.
Who else is gone ?  Murray, Martinez, Espinoza, Sorrento, some young
OFer, another young pitcher...

I think Cleveland gets the best of this deal.  I agree with Nazz: I can't
see this as anything other than a one-year use of Lofton.  Can they
really afford to re-sign Lofton, Maddux and Glavine ?  And of the 3
I'd take Lofton and Maddux if I can only have 2.  If they let Lofton
walk and keep the 2 pitchers, I think they're taking a big gamble.
Sure, pitching is 90% of the game.  But pitching is also a gamble,
especially with aging pitchers.  It's good these guys are finesse
guys and don't rely on their fastball.

Justice is clearly a salary dump.  If he's healthy I think he'll
enjoy success in the AL.

Cleveland definitely helped their offense.  But pitching is *still*
their problem.
63.3164ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe *PACK* is backWed Mar 26 1997 17:043
    
    Pitching is still their problem?  I think you better go look at the
    numbers again. 
63.3165SNAX::ERICKSONWed Mar 26 1997 20:275
    
    	Someone mentioned park effects and Atlanta. What is the concensus
    on the new ball park? Will it be a hitters park or a pitchers park?
    
    Ron
63.3166ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Mar 27 1997 11:265
    
    Given the elevation of Atlanta (highest park above sea level until
    the Rockies entered the league), it's likely to end up a hitter's park.
    
    Joe
63.3167ODIXIE::ZOGRANAny day now....Thu Mar 27 1997 12:124
    I'll let you know after this weekend when the first exhibition games
    (vs the Yankmees) are played.  Speculation is that its a hitter park.

    UMDan
63.3168Two best GMs in the gameRTOMS::SHERMANSThe former MUNDIS::SSHERMANThu Mar 27 1997 13:4141
What a perfect example of a trade that helps both teams.  Cleveland does
away with the uncertainty that will surround Lofton the entire season and
replaces him with the center fielder who most nearly approaches him in
value.  Justice should fit in as well, though I agree he was not a vital
element.  I think Giles is probably ready, and that means the Indians may
very well not be done dealing.

Atlanta is definitely a one-year stop for Lofton, who expect Andrew Jones
to be their regular center fielder starting in 1998.  At that time, not
burdened by the contracts of Lofton, Justice, or Grissom, there will be
enough money to pay both Maddux and Glavine what the market says they're
worth (hint: more than John Smoltz).  And they get the lefty they need
for the bullpen.  And just perhaps Andrew Jones (who last I looked was
not setting Florida on fire) gets a chance to mature for half a season
in Triple A.

John Hart and John Schuerholz are geniuses.

In .3163 yesterday Joe G. wrote:

>especially with aging pitchers.  It's good these guys are finesse
>guys and don't rely on their fastball.

Actually, numerous studies have shown that power pitchers last longer
than junkballers.  Presumably the breaking stuff puts more wear and
tear on the elbow and shoulder.

Maddux turns 31 next month, Glavine turned 31 two days ago.  These are
not yet "aging" pitchers.  And both of them are athletes and take care
of themselves.  If there are any two pitchers in the game I'd take a
chance on, it's these two.

And strictly speaking, Maddux at least *does* rely on his fastball.  It's
not one of those 97 MPH heaters that get all the attention, rather it
comes in at about 90, and he throws it (I would guess) at least 80% of
the time.  The thing is that he can put it on either edge of the plate
and he can make it tail in either direction.  When he's on, he is as
unhittable as any pitcher in the game, but since he's not blowing people
away, it's hard to figure how he does it.

Steve
63.3169bring back the "ol' loopty loo"BRLLNT::LONGTaxation without representationThu Mar 27 1997 14:3719
    >And strictly speaking, Maddux at least *does* rely on his fastball. 
    >It's not one of those 97 MPH heaters that get all the attention, 
    >rather it comes in at about 90, and he throws it (I would guess) 
    >at least 80% of the time.  The thing is that he can put it on 
    >either edge of the plate and he can make it tail in either direction.  
    
    Steve, this is one of the 90's nuances of baseball that really 
    makes little sense to me.  IMHO a "fastball" (aka heater) is a
    straight pitch with everything you can muster behind it.  Obviously
    a good pitcher can place the heater to cross the plate where ever
    he wants.  If the pitch "tails" then it should be called on a
    "curveball" (aka funny-one).
    
    All the latest names for pitches that break differently are 
    really variations of the curveball.  They only seem to confuse
    the likes of myself.
    
    
    billl
63.3170BIGQ::MCKAYThu Mar 27 1997 15:4210
    a fastball does not have to be straight.  5 people can grip the ball
    exactly the same and you could have 5 different movements on the ball.
    Many righthanded pitcher's "fastball" tails in and vice versa for
    lefty's.  If it's your hardest pitch, that's your fastball.
    
    BTW who would want to throw a straight pitch besides the batter....
    
    Jimbo
    
    
63.3171EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Mar 27 1997 16:2119
    
>    Steve, this is one of the 90's nuances of baseball that really 
>    makes little sense to me.  IMHO a "fastball" (aka heater) is a
>    straight pitch with everything you can muster behind it.
    
    Yeah, I have to disagree with this too.  The straight fastball with 
    little or no movement on it is an accident waiting to happen, always 
    has been, and always will be.  The difference in movement was the 
    difference between the 100+ mph fastballs of Goose Gossage and Rob 
    Dibble.  Gossage had it, Dibble didn't.
    
    And there's no mistaking any kind of fastball, or even slider, with the
    honest-to-goodness curveball.  'Course you don't see many of those 
    anymore either (between Gordon and Sele the Red Sox have almost
    cornered the market).
    
    glenn
    
       
63.3172CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Mar 27 1997 16:2530
  I agree with Jimbo. I've heard many people say that the movement on a
fastball is more important that the speed. 

  From what I've heard, the big difference between fastball movement and a
curve or slider is the direction of the spin. A curve or slider spins in a way
that causes a pitch from a rightie to break from right to left. Visa versa for
a leftie. A tailing fast ball usually goes the other way, left to right for a
rightie. 

  Also, fastball spin creates lift on the ball rather than forcing it to drop
hence the "rising fastball". It doesn't really rise it just drops slower than
the batter expects creating an "exploding" effect as it crosses the plate. 

  It seems that from a right handed pitchers point of view the spin would
push the ball in the following way:

                 __        
    /|\           /|          /
     |           /           /
     |          /          |/__

  "Rising"    Tailing    "Breaking"
  Fastball    Fastball    pitch

  "Explodes"  Drifts in   Down and
   on the     on a right  away from
   batter     handed btr  a rightie

  Reverse for lefties,
  George
63.3173How many can you name?BRLLNT::LONGTaxation without representationThu Mar 27 1997 17:139
    Glad to see I can actually find something a few of you 
    can agree on. ;^)
    
    I beef wasn't what the pitches did, it was with the myriad
    of names that seem to have litteraly poped up in the last
    ten years.
    
    
    billl