[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hbahba::cam_sports

Title:Sports 93-96 Archive. No new notes allowed
Notice:Chainsaw's last standSPORTS_97
Moderator:HBAHBA::HAAS
Created:Mon Jan 11 1993
Last Modified:Tue Apr 15 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:302
Total number of notes:117855

9.0. "The National Football League (NFL)" by CAM3::WAY (Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions) Mon Jan 11 1993 12:48

This topic is reserved for discussions about the National Football League.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
9.1PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 11 1993 17:542
    Well, how about that AFC (L)East!  The AFC finals will feature two
    teams from that maligned division.
9.2all my favorites are outCNTROL::CHILDSLiz Smith wants Madonna's bodyMon Jan 11 1993 18:015
hopefully Buffalo survives. The thought of watching crybaby Dan and Shula
in the big one is very disturbing to me. Almost as disturbing as watching
Dallas make it.....

mike
9.3AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSMon Jan 11 1993 18:2417
    Dallas and SF for the NFC title !!!! One could not have asked for a
    better matchup.  
    
    I honestly feel that the 'Boys are a year away from the Super Bowl, but
    they have progressed quite nicely these past few years.  One wonders
    how the new NFL Agreement will affect this team, and whether we will be
    able to get Reggie White to come play DL for us next year.
    
    All in all an excellent year for the 'Boys.  My prediction for the
    games this weekend:
    
                      Buffalo @Miami:  24-20
                      Dallas @SF:      10-34
    
    Next year the SB will belong to Dallas, as this is SF last hurrah.
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
9.4AXIS::ROBICHAUDAnother NEW Boston Garden goneMon Jan 11 1993 18:407
    	Hey BigMac, the whole AFC stinks!  MikeC, I personally would
    love to see the Dolphins stomp the Bills next week and have that
    Miami drug money push the Super Bowl line to some small number,
    'cuz the NFC will dominate again.  Plus after watching the 'Phins
    yesterday a comeuppance for them would be fun to watch.
    
    				/Don
9.5CUPMK::DEVLINRAY What now? I'm Going to Disneyworld!Mon Jan 11 1993 18:5013
Well of the remaining teams, each has a chance of making Super Bowl 
History.

San Fran, of course, can be the firsted to 5 Super Bowls.

Dallas can become the third team to LOSE 4 Super Bowls.

Miami can also become the third team to Lose 4 Super Bowls.  Don the Genius
Shula has a chance for his 5th Super Bowl loss.

Buffalo can lose its 3rd straight Super Bowl.

JD
9.6Somebody, anybody, please beat Luckalo...BSS::JCOTANCHMon Jan 11 1993 19:209
    Well, out of the teams that were in the playoffs, the 2 I least wanted
    to win it are still in, and the the 2 I most wanted to see win it are
    still in.
    
    Sure was a satisfying win for Miami yesterday, after what seems like
    the whole country picked the Chargers.
    
    
    Joe
9.8CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Mon Jan 11 1993 19:5433
    
    Well I have to get this off my chest as I'm still a little peeved.
    
    I watched some of the Bills-Steelers game beginning with the fluff
    piece OJ Simpson did on the O'Donnell family. I'm not a big fan of
    OJ's reporting style, but thought he was doing a decent job painting
    the picture of Neil O'Donnell and his dedicating the season to his
    ill father.
    
    Well OJ is ending the piece talking about the time he spent with
    the two O'Donnell brothers who reside in New York when he IGNORANTLY
    states, and I paraphrase " I spent the evening with Tom and Peter
    O'Donnell, and they must have thought I was Irish because I still
    have a big headache to prove it."  What an ignorant ~/~! 
    Here's a man who's been in the public limelight for years, and
    as a African-American has probably seen more racism and stereotyping
    than I could ever imagine, and he's unbelievably making a statement
    reinforcing another negative stereotype!!!  I was absolutely livid
    and apoplectic!  Hell, I probably overreacted as OJ definitely meant
    no harm, but dammit, HE should know and be sensitive about these
    things. 
    Well I'm about to pen a letter to OJ and NBC protesting this type
    of statement. Dammit, OJ, THINK before you say something like that
    on national TV!  Damn, I can equate what he said to some of Al
    Campanis' ignorant statements. Hell, I'm no PC person, but in
    his position of influence, OJ oughta be more careful in the words
    he chooses.
    
    Flame off,
    MikeL
    
    
    
9.9MKFSA::LONG"just keep it between the lines"Mon Jan 11 1993 20:177
	Mike,  I heard the same thing and had the same reaction you did. 
	I turned to my wife and asked her if he will get the same treatment 
	Jimmy "the Greek" got.  

	I think not, although he deserves it.

	Bill
9.10ROYALT::ASHEBe a team player...Mon Jan 11 1993 20:522
    Didn't see it, but I can sympathize with you...
    
9.11hypotheticalACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Tue Jan 12 1993 03:295
    So how would theyhave scheduled the games on Sunday if SD had won? 2
    games on the West Coast, anyone know??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.12CUPMK::DEVLINRAY What now? I'm Going to Disneyworld!Tue Jan 12 1993 11:4617
TCM:

One game would have been a morning (PST) start.  

REgarding Sunday:

It sure was nice seeing the "Ultimate QB Weapon" do his bounce pass
routine.  Crandall Runningham, the most overrated QB in the league, and
approaching all-time overrated status.   He still can't read zone
defenses, and he's still enamoured with his own physical skills.   Then
again, I guess most folks would bounce passes trying to throw while
choking.

Oh, and before the season, I told Bob Hunt that Herschal would fumble
ina big game.  Nice cough up, Hershal.

JD
9.13PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 12 1993 14:093
9.14PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 12 1993 15:1829
    First Gastineau, now this.  Will the Sack Exchange become the Chain
    Gang?
    
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc,clari.sports.top

Subject: Former football pro pleads in fraud case
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 15:20:40 PST

	PHILADELPHIA (UPI) -- Former New York Jets All-Pro defensive lineman
Joe Klecko pleaded guilty Monday to lying to a grand jury investigating
auto insurance fraud.
	Klecko, of Malvern, faces sentencing April 8. The plea came shortly
before his trial in a federal courtroom was to begin.
	Klecko was caught up in a scheme which led to the arrest of 67 people
for allegedly trying to defraud Sun Oil. The scheme involved cars
allegedly damaged by emissions from Sun's Marcus Hook refinery.
	Klecko was apparently one of a number of auto and truck owners
recruited to lend their registrations so that false claims could be
submitted. When called to testify before a grand jury, Klecko lied about
the condition of his truck.
	Klecko's lawyer John Wing said the former football player knew
nothing of the scheme and was trying to protect friends. Wing said
Klecko appeared before the grand jury without a lawyer and was unaware
investigators knew his story was false.
	Klecko, who played collegiately at Temple, was a member of the Jets
from 1977-87. He was voted to the Pro Bowl after the 1981, 1983, 1984
and 1985 seasons and was a member of the defensive line known as the 
``New York Sack Exchange.''
9.15LAGUNA::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanTue Jan 12 1993 17:4713
    
    re Irish drinking:
    
    As some of you know, I've been working quite a bit with Irish people,
    as my customer is building a new factory in Ireland.  I've met 40-50 
    Irish people, either DEC employees or customers, and their family in
    the last 18 months.  To a person, they all backed up the reputation
    (and some of it I witnessed) of the Irish as drinkers, and didn't seem
    upset about it.  What DID bother them is when Americans of Irish
    descent pass themselves off as being Irish.  They can't understand that
    at all.
    
    Brews
9.16CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyTue Jan 12 1993 18:4319
    What's your point Brews?
    
    That I shouldn't be offended by OJ's ignorant statement?
    I'm an American who happens to have some Irish ancestors. 
    The negative stereotype perpetrated by Simpson referred to "Irish"
    as heavy drinkers. That insulted *me* as an American with some
    Irish background. I do not speak for anyone else, whether they be
    Irish or not. The fact is that his statement offended me by
    furthering a perceived stereotype. Just because your Irish
    cohorts laugh it off doesn't mean I or anyone else with an Irish
    background feels the same way. 
    
    And you can tell your Irish friends that this person regards himself
    as an American with Irish ancestors, not an Irishman, if that makes
    them feel any better.
    
    MikeL
      
    
9.17LAGUNA::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanTue Jan 12 1993 19:246
    
    My point is that you ain't Irish, and people whine about the littlest
    things.  There are few Irish people who would have a problem with what
    he said (maybe Sinead, but the Irish are embarassed about her anyway).
    
    Brews
9.18QUASER::JACKSONTAA2 brings out the hypocritesTue Jan 12 1993 20:205
      I have Irish background in me, and some native american indian, and
    It didn't offend me.  Course I like to drink when the occasion is
    right.
    
      Tim
9.19PARVAX::WARDLE_MTue Jan 12 1993 20:5910
    Hey, if the Americans who happen to be of Irish decent don't want to be
    associated with drinking, then why all the St. Patty's day hoopla? 
    
    Youze guys are too sensative...they've been stereotyping us
    Italian-Americans as good looking, stylish, and intelligent for years
    and it hasn't bothered me one bit.
    
    Get a life, will ya?
    
    JoJ_NOT
9.20QUASER::HUNTERIsn't That Right, AlTue Jan 12 1993 21:224
    
     I know...  I'm 50% IA and I get that stuff all the time, JoJ_Not !
    
    BG
9.21QUASER::JACKSONTAA2 brings out the hypocritesTue Jan 12 1993 23:099
      reply .19 sounds sooooo much like the Jo*,  don't ya agree?           
    
       The AFC will rool again.  Give it 2-3 years;^)
    
    
      Does anyone have the stats as to the afc vs nfc this year?
    
    
      Tim
9.22CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeWed Jan 13 1993 12:3811
    
    Yabbut
    
    Being 50% tall, I find myself offended, half the time, with jokes
    about the weather!
    
    I remain,
    "wardling" on the other half!
    ;^)
    Kev
    
9.23CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyWed Jan 13 1993 13:0020
    I'll put this to rest now.
    
    *I* was offended and it pissed me off. I'm not Irish and do you
    think OJ was referring to natives of Ireland only? I ain't asking for
    his job, an apology, nuttin, bros.  What pissed me off is that he
    made this ignorant statement in a national medium. He should know
    better and shut his big mouf! So y'all can go pound sand in telling me
    how I should react. I gots a pretty thick skin, mo buichailles ( dat's
    Irish ISFH), and I've heard much worse than that. And as far as gittin'
    a life, I gots one danke, and shall continue to have one and don't need
    advice. 
    Case closed, let's get back to football.
    
    SF over Dallas by 6
    Buffalo over Miami by 3.
    
    And my name ain't Jimbo. 8^)
    
    MikeL
    
9.24NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 13 1993 13:0013
    
    OJ's a dork.  His line may or may not have offended most Irish
    Americans but the fact that he apparently didn't even think twice about
    it just fits the general pattern he's demonstrated over the years as 
    one of the worst broadcasters/reporters to ever settle in behind a 
    microphone.  I mean, the guy has been *horrible* for years, but his
    name keeps him in a job.  Kinda like Joe Namath.
    
    However, MikeL, I think you might have a better case against Notre
    Dame... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
9.258^)CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyWed Jan 13 1993 13:5018
    Ah but glenn mon ami,
    
    The ND "Fighting Irish" is not purported to represent the popular
    notion of the "Irish" as internecine warriors. It was intended to
    represent the valor and courage of the "Irish-American" brigades
    of both the Union and Confederacy during the Civil War or War Between
    the States; thus no negative stereotyping yet a positive depiction.
    
    Mainfully the words "although the odds be great or small..." carries
    through this storied depiction into Four Horseman legend and deed.
    But I wax poetic in the wrong note... There I feel much better.
    Danke, mein freund, for the gentle prod.
    
    
    
    Ahhhhh,
    MikeL
     
9.26Total fiction?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 13 1993 14:5017
    
    > The ND "Fighting Irish" is not purported to represent the popular
    > notion of the "Irish" as internecine warriors. It was intended to
    > represent the valor and courage of the "Irish-American" brigades
    > of both the Union and Confederacy during the Civil War or War Between
    > the States; thus no negative stereotyping yet a positive depiction.
    
    This is getting off the beaten track, but is this actual origin of the
    nickname?  I had heard some hackeneyed tale of how the Indiana
    homesteaders oft made jest of the (French) Notre Dame fathers and
    followers, picking fights with them in town and usually getting the 
    desired results.  These ignorant Indianans thought that the French
    were Irish, and such was born the nickname.  At least this is how I
    heard the story from some ND alum somewhere down the line...
    
    glenn
    
9.27CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyWed Jan 13 1993 15:1813
    
    -1,
    Didn't hear that one glenn. But I do know that ND was known as the
    "Ramblers" until the early 20's ( Rockne era). 
    I heard and seen the story I narrated. 
    The one thing that *is* true is that the slogan has nothing to do with
    the battles in and amongst Eire. 
    
    Oh well, 
    Back to pro football??
    
    MikeL
    
9.28CUPMK::DEVLINJunk Note Free ZoneWed Jan 13 1993 17:5716
    
    Bruce -
    
    Um, are you of Irish descent?  I have mucho relatives in Ireland.
    There is a movement to stop the portrayal of the 'paddy'.
    
    In the states, theres a movement to stop it also.  Its stereotyping 
    Bruce - just like using the Uncle Tom figure, for instance, for 
    African AMericans, or a mafia hit man for all Italians, or
    soccer players for folks like you.
    
    Given that drunken portrayals of the Irish started with the British 
    as a form of comedy for the landed gentry (actors were British, of
    course), the stereotype is just that.
    
    JD
9.29(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBSqueelers = Loser Girly Mons Wed Jan 13 1993 19:0710
    
    >>Didn't hear that one glenn. But I do know that ND was known as the
    >>"Ramblers" until the early 20's ( Rockne era). 
       ^^^^^^^^
    What'd they have to do with AMC Motors????  Were they as horrible back
    then as Ramblers were????
    
    JaKe
    
    
9.30HEFTY::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Jan 13 1993 19:5528
    
    
    	The problem with this whole O.J. thing is that if the shoe were
    on the other foot, we'd be seeing Jesse, Rev. Al, and the ACLU asking
    for a retraction along with a resignation.
    
    	Seems to me that I recall Howard Cosell on a national TV broadcast
    calling a Redskin widereciver a 'little monkey' (not in a derrogatory
    way) and it was blown completely out of proportion.  Marg Schott makes
    some comments and again, she is completely raked through the media.
    
    	Now, OJ makes a derrogatory comment which just so happens to
    involve a ethnic white group.  Ahh, but this was 'funny'...no harm,
    no foul.  It was all in jest!  So they all say.  And then some even
    say, "well, isn't it true?"
    
    	This plainly stinks of bias in the media.  Again, Jesse can call
    NY 'hymietown' and it is brushed off.  OJ can call the Irish a bunch
    of drunkards and it is laughed off.  But, let anyone say that blacks
    are lazy and not as smart as white folks, and they are labeled with
    the KKK.
    
    	I for one do not brush this off so easily.  I'm not Irish, but
    I do see a double standard here and those that feel offended have
    a right to say so.  And OJ should be brought to task on the comment!
    
    bill..g.
    
9.31TORREY::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanWed Jan 13 1993 21:3811
    
    I don't know what my heritage has to do with this, but I do have some
    Irish blood in me, along with just about everything else.  OJ's remarks
    didn't bother me, because I'm not whiney and didn't let it.  Remarks
    about Scots, Germans, the English or American Indians don't bother me
    either.  Try being thick-skinned and having a sense of humor, it makes
    life more pleasant.
    
    Still haven't seen any Irish upset about the comments.
    
    Brews
9.32CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 14 1993 11:5320
>    either.  Try being thick-skinned and having a sense of humor, it makes
>    life more pleasant.
>    
>    Still haven't seen any Irish upset about the comments.
    
Hmmm.

In reading this note all at once (haven't been in the file in a couple
of days) I got the impression that the issue wasn't so much the comment,
as it was the insensitive and careless way it was made.

Not wanting to start a rathole, but billG had a point.  No one gets upset
when OJ makes a stereotypical comment about a group of white people, 
but if it were the other way around.....


Oh well.....


'Saw
9.33CUPMK::DEVLINJunk Note Free ZoneThu Jan 14 1993 12:4012
Bruce -

I too don't get all upset about it.  But to me, it seemed that you 
dismissed folks being angry cuz you've had drinks with some
Irishmen.   That's all.

JD

PS:  Jim Kelly, an obvious drunken Irish-American, will start vs. the
Dolphins this weekend.    

Signing off to get sloshed and eat some potato.
9.34CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyThu Jan 14 1993 12:4215
    Bruce you just don't get it.
    You state that you haven't heard any "Irish" upset about it.
    As JD pointed out, this stereotype began about the Irish in Ireland
    and continued to include any American ( or Canadian, Australian, etc)
    of Irish background. Can't you see that?
    The fact remains that OJ furthered a negative stereotype by his
    ignorant statement and I was offended. Period.
    
    And 'Saw, my beef is with the comment AND the careless and ignorant
    way that OJ presented it. But I ain't calling for his haid, just that
    he think before he says something like that.
    
    Latah,
    MikeL
    
9.35These examples are worlds apart...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 14 1993 13:1524
    > Seems to me that I recall Howard Cosell on a national TV broadcast
    > calling a Redskin widereciver a 'little monkey' (not in a derrogatory
    > way) and it was blown completely out of proportion.  Marg Schott makes
    > some comments and again, she is completely raked through the media.
    
    I wouldn't equate the comments that Marge Schott made with any of these
    other examples.  Her statements were clearly hateful and her front
    office hiring record suggests that she did more than just say things,
    but actually acted on them.  You make statements like "I'd rather have 
    a trained monkey working for me than a n&^$%$" and the record backs it
    up, you should be held accountable.  I don't think she's received
    excessively negative media attention.
    
    OJ was perhaps insensitive but it's fairly obvious that his comments
    were *not* derogatory (yes, same as Cosell).  In the context that he
    used he did not come close to calling the Irish "a bunch of drunkards". 
    After all, in the story *he* was the one slugging back the drinks to 
    the point where his head hurt the next day.  OJ tried to inject some 
    self-deprecation into a little joke but used bad judgment. 
    
    glenn
      
    
9.37CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 14 1993 13:3010
>    And 'Saw, my beef is with the comment AND the careless and ignorant
>    way that OJ presented it. But I ain't calling for his haid, just that
>    he think before he says something like that.
    
Okay.  I thought you had downplayed the comment a bit to highlight the
ignorance of OJ making it.   I get it now.


'Saw    

9.38fyiFRETZ::HEISERarms raised in a VThu Jan 14 1993 13:4211
    Hate to disrupt you sunburned lushes but there was an interesting
    report out of Mobile yesterday (site of the NFL Coach's Convention and
    Senior Bowl).  Many times, owners and potential coaches show up as well
    for filling openings and interviewing.
    
    - All NFL teams are represented there except for the 4 playoff teams and 
      the Phoenix Cardinals.  
    - Pat Bowlen is there
    - Ditka isn't there.
    
    Mike
9.39SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Thu Jan 14 1993 14:2814
    
    
    	The point is that I'm not offended either, but it just shows that
    there is an inbalance in how the media reacts.  I wasn't taken aback
    by any of it, but it is sad when one group or groups create a feeding
    frenzy over the same type of comment while the other goes ingnored.
    
    	Believe me, if had been Bradshaw making a comment that dealt with
    a minority race, folks would be calling for his head.  But I guess
    since it was OJ, and since no one got, nor should they have gotten
    offended by the comment, we'll just let it slide.
    
    bill..g.
    
9.41PARVAX::WARDLE_MThu Jan 14 1993 23:073
    More importantly, how many Irish QB's have ever won the Superbowl?
    
    JoJ_the_peacemaker
9.42CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyFri Jan 15 1993 14:168
    Why JoJ!
    You're favorite Jest!! Namath had to have some Irish in him, no?
    Didn't he win the Supe wif a massive hangover? ( or was that the
    champeenship game agin Oakland?)
    
    8^),
    MikeL
                          
9.45jury is out - business or pleasureFRETZ::HEISERarms raised in a VFri Jan 15 1993 16:382
    Hey Brews, we're gonna have to start a Cardinals topic if the clowns
    hire Dikka.
9.46CSC32::A_PARRACOStarless and Bible Black Sat Jan 16 1993 19:349
    
    Geez, just 1 week into the new conference, and the topic has been
    irrevoccably rat-holed ...
    
    "I jez thank that's SAAAAAD !"
    
    Carry on.
    
    - acp
9.47GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseSun Jan 17 1993 22:1014
    After watching the NFC championship game, I cannot believe that the
    network announcers (Madden & Summerall) wouldn't point out the "flow"
    of the game being affected by several well palced (and well thrown)
    penalty flags, taking scores and momentum from the 49ers. I am a fan of
    neither team (I'm an Eagles fan, for what that's worth) but the two
    holding calls were obscene and caused a 14 point swing in the final
    score. After the second "holding call" (Holding on an RB on a play
    fake... not likely), my wife and I turned it off, knowing that the NFL
    wanted the 'boys to win and that it would work out that way. I have
    zero interest in the Super Bowl and will watch it minimally. Is the
    mass public that big a sheep that they cannot see what's going on?!?!
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.48ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Jan 18 1993 02:438
    re: .47
    
    Heck of a charge. Guess I'm just one of the sheep who can't see whats
    going on.  Oh yeah, I loathe the Cowboys and was hoing they would lose.
    At least Miami lost.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.49NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 18 1993 12:1015
    
    > I am a fan of
    > neither team (I'm an Eagles fan, for what that's worth) but the two
    > holding calls were obscene and caused a 14 point swing in the final
    > score.
    
    Well, I was rooting for the 49ers (this Super Bowl is going to be hard
    to stomach, all the way around, but if I must-- Go Bills!), but the 
    first holding call was legit, on a pass rusher coming right up the
    middle to prevent a sack.  I won't comment on the second one, the
    defensive holding, except to say that it probably prevented an exciting
    finish for neutral onlookers.
    
    glenn
    
9.51CUPMK::DEVLINJunk Note Free ZoneMon Jan 18 1993 13:0817
The refs calls did affect the flow of the game.  McIntyre was holding,
sure nuf.   But on reply, on the last TD, the Boys tackle is clearly
holding.  Same on other plays.

Consistency was not their, IMO.   

Niners turnovers cost them dearly.

A nightmare SuperBowl.  The Cowboys, the team that CBS and the NFl
want back on top, the team with the most obnoxious fans of all 
time (and fairweather fans, to boot - witness the empty seats a 
few years back), coupled with the Bills, a team with a girly m on
offense.

Wow is me.

JD
9.52CUPMK::DEVLINJunk Note Free ZoneMon Jan 18 1993 13:095
Tommy B. -

Are you a Cowboy fan?

JD
9.53BSS::JCOTANCHMon Jan 18 1993 13:589
    Pretty ridiculous claim there, Dennis.  If anything, the league would
    want their precious Niners to stay at the top and go for their fifth
    ring with Montana playing in the Super Bowl in "heroic" fashion.  And
    in case you didn't notice, flags are thrown when the penalty occurs,
    not after the play is over.  It's not like the refs wait and see what 
    happens on the play and if it's bad for Dallas, decide to pull out a flag.
    
    
    Joe
9.54LAGUNA::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanMon Jan 18 1993 14:0926
    C'mon JD, 95% of the world is a Cowboy fan, now. Again.  I guess the
    loss so shook you up that your usually excellent spelling abilities got
    a case of Caso.  
    
    Penalties and turnovers did the 9ers in.  Without the 1st half
    turnovers, game would have been over at halftime.  Cowboys did very
    well in not committing either faux pas.  I was hoping JJ's screw up in
    going for it on 4th down was going to come back to haunt him, but no
    such luck.
    
    One thing people have never given the Reagan/Bush era credit for is for
    ending the Cowboys' era.  I think it is little more than coincidental
    that the 1st post Reagan/Bush Superbowl is going to feature the
    Cowboys.  I'm sure MrT would have had some sort of conspiracy theory
    for this.
    
    And one more thing, JR, Mr. Cowboys R Us, I'm doing a Sh$%load of
    International business, but I ain't gonna use your support!!  8^)
    
    Haven't cheered for the AFC team since '79
    
    Brews
    
    
    
      
9.55Got the B-day present I wanted mostPBST::BROWNAre you a Turtle?Mon Jan 18 1993 14:3913
	Here we go again blaming the ref with the loss. Both teams got penalized 
when they commited fouls. Like the previous note said the refs don't wait for
the play to complete before the throw the flag. 

       The Cowboys outplayed the 9 er's at the Stick and won. All the crying and 
whining in the world is not going to change the outcome. The BS that the
league wanted the 9er's to lose is just that, BS!! The 9 er's turned the ball
over to many times and it cost them at least ten points.  


 
	Cadzilla
9.57LAGUNA::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanMon Jan 18 1993 15:068
    geeez Tommy, you make it sound like I am calling you a Cowboys fan.  I
    wwould never denigrate your character (for Cowboysfans, that means "say
    bad things about") in such a manner.  No one has really blamed it on
    the refs, except for some deranged Eagles fan (oxymoron, I know), and
    who has ever paid attention to him before?
    
    8^)
    Brews
9.59Cowboys - Just say NO!METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Jan 18 1993 15:212
The Crazy Met
9.60PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 18 1993 15:522
    Who ever woulda thunk it, an Eagle fan and a Giant fan whining about a
    Cowboy victory.  Next thing you know, we'll see a Redskin fan in here.
9.62ROYALT::ASHEIt's big, heavy, it's wood...Mon Jan 18 1993 16:137
    I didn't see the McIntyre play, and I'm not even sure what the second
    call was. Niners defense cost them the game, plain and simple.
    
    FWIW, my roommates and friends were whining about the Bills game when
    they had a TD called back because of holding and how the refs were
    biased.  I don't know, I just watch the game, I ain't paid for reffing.
    
9.63METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Jan 18 1993 16:176
Karen,

I thought you were a native New Englander. How'd your brothers end up
as Cowboy fans??

The Crazy Met
9.64LAGUNA::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanMon Jan 18 1993 16:285
>              How'd your brothers end up
>as Cowboy fans??
    
Inbreeding

9.66LAGUNA::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanMon Jan 18 1993 16:537
    Ms. Derry,
    
    Please do not take my remark in .63 as a dispersion of your character,
    upbringing or parentage.  I was attempting to find the only plausible
    reason for such a tragedy to strike your family, and meant no offense.
    
    Brews
9.67METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Jan 18 1993 17:056
Brews,

Karen's p-name obviously refers to her brothers :-) Anyway her note
mentions mutant genes.

The Crazy Met
9.69LAGUNA::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanMon Jan 18 1993 17:246
    I realize that, TCC.  However, I wasn't sure what context my remarks
    would be taken in.  Generally, it's not nice to say that someone's
    siblings are the result of inbreeding, and I had some second thoughts
    about entering it.  Hopefully, she takes it in the spirit it was meant.
    
    Brews
9.70METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Jan 18 1993 17:497
>  I realize that, TCC.

One warning is all your gonna get Brews :-) We're back to TCM. Just
remember you may need infor from me again.

The Crazy Met
9.71GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseMon Jan 18 1993 18:0418
    set mode BAAAAAAA
    
    THE OFFICIALS WERE FINE
    THE OFFICIALS WERE FINE
    THE OFFICIALS WERE FINE
    
    Set mode normal
    
    I would like everyone in here who criticized my comments to tell me how
    many times they've seen a RB tackled on a play fake. Now tell me how
    many times they've seen a holding call on it. It just strikes me a bit
    "strange" that on a 3rd down pass, you would try to throw the ball to
    the guy you play faked to. 
    
    OK OK you win, (in drone like voice) the officials have no effect on
    the outcome of the game..... they simply call it even..... it's just a
    pod, it won't hurt you..... All cowboys fans are unbiased....
    
9.72Buffalo - 0 fer 3???CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is THREE years old!!!Mon Jan 18 1993 18:2016
Gee, TCC is sure sensitive... (I doubt I'll ever need information from him)

re: holding

Remember every 0-lineman holds on every play.  They get called when their 
hands get too far away from their body, which is what happened in the 
Dallas/SF game.   Very seldom does an o-lineman complain about a holding call.

re: Cowboys

I dunno, I found it much easier to hate the Landry/Staubach (sp?)/Bob Hayes 
teams than these teams.  Emmit Smith is a great back, and they really work 
hard in the trenches.  If it weren't for JJ I could possibly even (gulp) like 
them.

=Bob=
9.73METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Jan 18 1993 18:258
re: .71

Haven't you noticed that even the Cowboy haters don't agree that there was
a conspiracy?  Officials may not have been consistent but this is not the
first time or the last time that will happen.  But that is a pretty flimsy
argument for bias by the officials.

The Crazy Met
9.74GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseMon Jan 18 1993 18:3014
    re: .73
    
    If I was looking for consensus, I wouldn't have said anything. That
    others don't agree doesn't change the situation. IMO, the inconsistency
    of calls and outright awful calls had an adverse affect of the NFC
    championship game. It certainly had an affect on the momentum. As I
    said before, I wasn't routing for either team, I just wanted a decent
    game. I didn't get that, because of the guys in the striped shirts. I
    guess it isn't macho to talk about officials being a factor of the
    game, but they are, just like the condition of the field and both of
    the teams playing. To deny that if foolish and mistaken, IMO.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.75METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Jan 18 1993 18:4313
re: .74

Officiating definitely can affect a game, no argument there. Only argument
is with the claim that the refs were purposely making calls that favored the
Cowboys.

re: .72 - Bob "I'm a big Pat Riley fan" Mccullough

Nah, Cowboys are just as hateable now as they were in the Landry/Staubach
years.

The Crazy Met
9.77P&M, P&M, P&M , the dreaded Cowboys win their record 24 playoff gamePBST::BROWNAre you a Turtle?Mon Jan 18 1993 18:5419
	RE.74

   At what point did you see a outright awful call, when the LB blew his coverage
 and tackled the Smith after he broke through the line. Or was it the holding
 call that nullified the Rice TD in first half? Both were clearly visable via
 the replay given by CBS and the observation of the Madden and Summerall. 

  The 9er's lost the game on turnovers. Ask or listen to most any coach, annoucer,
  etc, that most of these big games are lost due to turnovers. The 9er's had 4,
  that led to 10 COWBOY points. The COWBOYS had one, and the 9er's didn't 
  capitalize on the COWBOY mistake.  The Bills beat the Dolphins on 5 turnovers
  which they turned into points that led to their win.

    Why is when the opposing team wins, its always because the ref's blew a 
 call  and not because they played a better game?

 Cadzilla
   
9.78AXIS::ROBICHAUDJimmyJohnsonHadAGoodHairDayMon Jan 18 1993 19:084
    	To paraphrase Denny...  I hate the Cowboys, but I love money.
    Lay the points.
    
    				/Don
9.79NO D no ring...BUMP::MMARLANDMon Jan 18 1993 19:268
    SF, lost the game on D. Basically Dallas let them beck in but going on
    4th . Following the 9er td, the D couldn't stop Dallas on the next
    posession. I  really wanted to see the 49er's win, but oh well. The 
    penalties had soemwhat of an impact, the call in the 4th, that was
    pivital. But good teams rebound. Look at last years SB, the Redskins
    had a TD called back, several penalties early but over came them.
    
    Plain and simple the D wins the big games for you. 
9.80GENRAL::WADEone step ahead of the jailer...Mon Jan 18 1993 21:2117
    
    	At the very end of the 1st half, Aikman was either sacked or
    	tackled for a 1-2 yard gain on 2cd down.  Whatever, he didn't
    	make a 1st down.  There was only like 10-15 seconds left and
    	they had no timeouts left.  The ref stopped the clock to spot
    	the ball allowing Dallas a little extra time to line up and 
    	spike the ball immediately after the ref started the clock	
    	back up.  They would have had a very hard time getting lined
    	up to spike the ball if the ref hadn't stopped the clock
    	because their receivers were downfield.  Dallas went on to
    	kick a field goal.
    
    	My question is, do the refs normally stop the clock to spot the
    	ball?  I couldn't ever remember seeing this before (except for
    	college when a 1st down is made to reset the chains).
    
    Claybroon 
9.81BSS::JCOTANCHMon Jan 18 1993 21:416
    RE: .80
    Clay, I wasn't watching real close near the end of the half so I can't
    comment on the clock stopping, but the Cowboys missed that field goal
    anyway.
    
    Joe
9.82LAGUNA::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanMon Jan 18 1993 22:585
    
    I was wondering why the clock was stopped, but also was relieved when
    the FG was missed.
    
    Brews
9.83PFSVAX::JACOBPgh. is no longer 'PAPERLESS'Mon Jan 18 1993 23:2416
    I was happy the Sowboys beat the 49ers.
    
    I'm sicka San Francisco.
    
    Back in the 60' when the STEELERS totally STUNK, I liked watching the
    Sowboys.
    
    Then, when the STEELERS was winning Super Bowls, I loved seeing the
    STEELERS beat the Sowboys.
    
    Then, both went into the toilet bowl about the same time, and now, both
    are re-emerging(although the sowboys are far superior to the STEELERS
    at this point) and will meet nexted year in the SB.
    
    JaKe
    
9.84The officials *WERE* fineELMAGO::BENBACAI've Got Three Knees!!Tue Jan 19 1993 00:1121
    RE- .71

    Dennis, How could you know what calls affected the outcome of the game
    when you said you turned it off and didn't watch the rest of the game. The
    second half was the telling story of the game.

    Of course after watching a full game of the Eagles getting soundly beat by
    the boys I guess I could understand why you would turn it off   :^)

    As far as the league and CBS wanting Dallas to win well that is BS.
    Dallas has been in 13 NFC title games and have lost 7 of them and won
    6. Hardly a preference by the league. And of the 6 appearances in the
    Superbowl they have won 2, lost 3, and have yet to play the 6th. They 
    have deserved every appearance and were competitive in all of them 
    including their losses.

    Do you honestly think the league had a preference when say  Pittsburgh
    and San Francisco went undefeated in the Superbowl? I don't. They never
    lost a Superbowl because they just flat outplayed the opposition. 

    
9.85CUPMK::DEVLINJunk Note Free ZoneTue Jan 19 1993 10:4512
re .58

In .52 I merely ask a question.  Is that okay?  I guess I could
have read yer intro to see who yer favorite teams were.

In .51, I don't blame the refs for the loss, turnovers and mistakes
kilt the Niners.   But the calls were inconsistant - and I hate
that.

Hope that clears up this bout of confustion.

JD
9.87CUPMK::DEVLINJunk Note Free ZoneTue Jan 19 1993 11:544
I don't do archives.   If you can't answer it, then that's life.


JD
9.88CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Jan 19 1993 11:5821
Well, maybe it's a rehash, but the first holding call in McIntyre was
definitely holding.  No gripe there.

The call that was highly unusual (at least to me) was the defensive holding
call against the 9ers, when Smith faked the run into the line.

99.9% of the time, the back is going to be tackled.  I mean, if you're
faking the defense out and they take the fake, what are they supposed to 
do?  San Fran bit hard on the fake and tackled him, then got called for
holding.

Markbreit, the ref, upheld the call, so I suppose that there is some
rule which covers it.  But if you never see that called, and all of a
sudden it gets called in the Championship game, it kinda stinks.


With that said, the Cowboys outplayed the 49ers and deserve to go to the
Super Bowl.....


'Saw
9.89NOVA::SWONGERRdb Software Quality EngineeringTue Jan 19 1993 12:488
	re: Stopping the clock to spot the ball

	Happens all the time. It just usually doesn't make that mcuh
	difference, since it's not usually the last few seconds of the half
	in a championship game. I've noticed it a lot, being a Bills fan,
	since the no huddle tends to point those things out a bit more.

	Roy
9.90NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 19 1993 12:5912
    
    You got it, 'Saw.  *One* marginal call.  Hardly evidence that a fix was
    in.  All this nonsense about "disrupting the flow of the game" is 
    exactly that, nonsense.  If a guy gets hauled down in front of the QB, 
    it should be called, whether it "disrupts the flow" or not.  Otherwise 
    there's no sense in making any penalty calls.  It's not the officials'
    job to turn the game into an artistic masterpiece.  Some games just
    aren't, and there's no sense in pretending all the "big" games should 
    be.
    
    glenn
    
9.91CUPMK::DEVLINJunk Note Free ZoneTue Jan 19 1993 13:068
Glenn

agreed.  And it should be called all the time, not just sometimes.

it should be called with equal vigor in the first quarter and the
forth quarter, in the first preseason game and in the SUPER BOWL.

JD
9.92CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Jan 19 1993 13:207
Well, I do not think that the defensive holding call on the fake should
have been called.  I think that it was a bad call.

I've got no gripe with the other calls.


And hell, what does it matter.... the Giants are sitting at home anyway ;^)
9.934 turnovers = no NFC crownPBST::BROWNAre you a Turtle?Tue Jan 19 1993 13:5519
	Why consider the call bad. Smith had broken through the line and
was in the defensive backfield when the LB/Spy that had responsibilty for 
Smith blew his coverage and grabbed him as he passed him going into an open
area. There wasn't another 9er within 10 yards when Smith broke through the
line. It looked to be a designed play and would have made the 1st down or more
if caught

	Who can say what might have happened if the LB had not held Smith. As
it was, Aikman had to throw to a secondary receiver of which all were covered
for an incomplete. 

   	I cannot see how one play out of 80 can make or break the entire game
for the 9er's. They got beat because they got outplayed and made to many 
mistakes. 

	Cadzilla

	
9.94CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Jan 19 1993 13:5917
>	Who can say what might have happened if the LB had not held Smith. As
>it was, Aikman had to throw to a secondary receiver of which all were covered
>for an incomplete. 

It kept the drive alive and allowed Dallas to score.  That might have 
happened anyway, but the penalty made sure it did.

Personally, I don't care one way or the other, cause as I've said the
Giants are sitting and we have a host of other problems to worry about,
but for an entire season you see teams running play action, and the
rb gets tackled at the line for no call.   All of a sudden in the
championship game it gets called.   That's inconsistent officiating,
and I'm surprised it came on Markbreit's crew -- he is usually one of the
best....


'Saw
9.95CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Jan 19 1993 14:006
Does anyone know who's officiating the Super Bowl?

If Red Cashion did a playoff game already, does that mean he won't do the
Bowl?

'Saw
9.96PBST::BROWNAre you a Turtle?Tue Jan 19 1993 14:397
	Sawman

  I would agree if he had been tackled at line of scrimage, but he had gone past
the line when Romanowski grabbed him. Thats Defensive holding!!

  Cadzilla
9.97CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Jan 19 1993 14:437
>  I would agree if he had been tackled at line of scrimage, but he had gone past
>the line when Romanowski grabbed him. Thats Defensive holding!!

I thought they called it on Pierce Holt.   I might be wrong.


'Saw
9.98officiating on the kickoffCSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketTue Jan 19 1993 14:4433
The only question I have about the officiating has to do with the
very first call of the game.  The kickoff.  Both teams were lined
up and ready, the Dallas kicker kicked the ball, the San Francisco
return man caught the ball, and then the whistle blew.  The Ref
made them replay because he said they had not yet given them
the ok to go ahead.

This isn't the first time I have seen this.  Seems like it's even
happened during a super bowl, and I think it happened the week
before when Dallas and Philly played.

So, is it likely that the officiating crew purposely waits a bit
to blow the start whistle just to let both teams know who's in
control?  In my opinion, this doesn't effect the outcome in any
possible way, but it does set the tone between the teams and
the officials.  

If it's not done on purpose, maybe it should be (being slow in
that start whistle, that is).  It probably serves to settle both
teams down a bit, and makes the game a bit easier to officiate.
I have seen games where the officials were very picky early in
the game and then got more lax as the game progressed.  And
these were often good games.  And I certainly can
understand an officiating crew wanting to let both teams know
early in the game just how calls will be made so that both
teams know what to expect.  It's kind of like strike zones in
baseball.  Give a big strike zone, or a small one, just keep it
consistent.

Jerry

P.S.  Before anyone misinterprets, I'm not claiming that the officials
gave the go ahead to kick off and then blew it dead.
9.99Buffalo Bills to Win the Super BowlBUCKS::DOWNINGTue Jan 19 1993 14:4412
    The Buffalo Bills will win the Super Bowl. You heard it here first!
    
    Dallas is a fast, young team with a lot of talent. Statistically,
    Dallas and Buffalo match up evenly in offense and defense. However,
    I beleive Buffalo's defense is on a roll. They are experienced, big,
    fast, and right now, playing at the peak of their game. Buffalo's
    defensive ends and linebackers won't give Emmet Smith much room to 
    run, and look for the same defense not to give the golden boy Aikman
    much time to pass. Kelly will undoubtedly be intercepted, but look for
    him to have one of his best passing games ever.
    
    -Jack the Hack 
9.100PBST::BROWNAre you a Turtle?Tue Jan 19 1993 14:477
Hell we both might be wrong, Romanowski was the Smith Spy for most of the game
 
Since the hole he went through was near the Center I expected ole 99 to be
the one they dropped the hanky on!

  Cadzilla
9.101NOVA::SWONGERRdb Software Quality EngineeringTue Jan 19 1993 14:5728
	I appreciate the enthusiasm for my favorite team, but I'd like to
	note that the Buffalo defense is by no means big and not
	particularly fast. 

	Big:

	Bruce Smith weighs about 276, Phil Hansen around 280, and Jeff
	Wright about 280 - not a particularly big defensive line. The LBs
	are about average (~240 lbs, I think), and the DBs are relatively
	short. 

	Fast: 

	Bruce Smith is certainly quick, and Phil Hansen has impressed the
	heck out of me in his pursuit, so I'd say that the DL is fast.
	Bennet, Talley, and Maddox are all fast LBs, but Conlan was
	relatively slow to start and a bit slower after about 47 knee
	surgeries. J.D. WIlliams is a fast DB, as is Henry Jones, but Odomes
	and Jackson are only average, and Kelso's play is all based on
	position, because he's slow.

	That said, the defense has been playing superbly, and I hope it
	continues. I think that the real key will be whether the Bills can
	move the ball against the league's #1 defense, especially on the
	ground.

	Roy
9.102AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSTue Jan 19 1993 14:5919
    Well, well, well, how times have changed.  It has been a painful trek
    up the NFL ladder and for the true Cowboy fans it is truly a fantastic
    feeling.  
    
    As far as fair-weather fans, you find them everywhere and in every
    sport.  Many people love to support winners more than they want to support
    teams.  I am sure than the Cowboy bandwagon will start to fill up with 
    fair-weather fans but it will also include those of us who have supported 
    the team through the lean years.  
   
    Consistency in officiating is an oxymoron.  Do Jordan, the Shaq, etc.
    get the same calls as a rookie ?  Why should the home team get certain
    calls just because they are the home team ?  Just because we see
    something on TV one way does not mean that the refs saw the exact same
    thing in the same manner.
    
    Mo' later,
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.  
9.104CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Jan 19 1993 15:2131
Re the last few:


On the kickoff thing, I've seen that a couple of times.  I don't know
why that happens.  Perhaps the crowd noise might have something to do
with it, or even the players being so keyed up they go.

I know in rugby the ref will say to each captain in a loud voice,
"are you ready?", and when he receives both answers, he blows the 
whistle.

I don't know why they have the problem in football......


re Romanowski:

I'm kinda partial to him, cause he's a home state boy (he's from a 
couple of towns over from my hometown) and I liked what he said about
them being outplayed -- he was honest about it.....



re Bruce Smith:

He's only 278 or so, but with him it's all muscle.  Compared to
some offensive linemen (and some d-linemen) he's light, but he doesn't
have anywhere near the body fat that the behemoths do.....


'Saw

9.105PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 19 1993 15:2417
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc,clari.sports.top
Subject: Sports Digest
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 93 16:07:23 PST

NFL:	Walter Payton, the NFL's all-time leading rusher, and Chuck Noll, who
	coached the Pittsburgh Steelers to four Super Bowl championships, are
	among the list of 15 finalists for election this year to the Pro
	Football Hall of Fame. 

	According to a business newspaper in Buffalo, the NFL's best fans are 
	in Denver. Business First ranked NFL fans recently using a formula that 
	accounted for average attendance over the past 10 years, stadium 	
	capacity, team record, difference in attendance between winning and 
	losing seasons, weather, local economic climate and
	cost of attending games. Fans of the Cleveland Browns finished second
	and the New York Giants were third. 
9.107hthACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Tue Jan 19 1993 17:3714
    re: .86, .87
    
    Don't want you to have to work too hard JD.
    
              <<< ALPHAX::PUB$:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 73.10009         Honorary Mike JN Junk Note Repository       10009 of 10090
MSBCS::BRYDIE "Nixon in '96!"                         3 lines   6-JAN-1993 15:21
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     It wasn't funny. Not even a little bit. Please don't direct any
    more notes to me. I don't want anything to do with you. Seriously.
    
9.108CUPMK::DEVLINJunk Note Free ZoneTue Jan 19 1993 17:5012
TCM -

I guess a thanks.  Is that what he's referring too.  I forgot all
about that.  I'll have to shed some crocodile tears.  Oh, my life
will be so vacant that the great and wonderful MSBCS::BRYDIE will
ignore me.  Oh woe is me.   How will I live?  I'll simply die,
without the wisdom that he spews forth washing over me.  Oh the
infamy.

boo-hoo

JD
9.109TV controls itMPO::MPO12::MCFALLThis is the end of the innocenceTue Jan 19 1993 18:436
	Re: Refs and the kickoff. It has to do with getting a signal from
the network that they are ready to cover it. If they don't get that signal,
then they are not supposed to kick off...

	Jim M.
9.110CNTROL::CHILDStake me to Roslyn CafeTue Jan 19 1993 18:4613
I believe that they stop the clock only if the team made a first down and they
have to move the chains. I concur with Saw that it was Pierce Holt and there's
no way Smith was in the defensive secondary, he was behind the line of scrimmage
making it an even worst call. Another bad call on the Johnston TD, I thought
if the defensive lineman made contact on offsides the play was blown dead?
Dallas still probably would have scored but it might explain why the niners
just stood around...

anyways I still hate Dallas and I can't admit that they won fair and square
and I hope the Bills kick the crap out of them.

 mike 
9.111Bush delivers KOD to CowboysHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortTue Jan 19 1993 19:0615
Don't worry about Dallas.

George Bush has delivered the Kiss O' Death and has jumped on the Cowboys
band wagon. Las Vegas will naturally adjust the line ;-).

On another front, Steve Young's agent is going to press San Fran into
trading Young so he can get out of the shadow of Joe Montana. It seems
that Young doesn't like the pressure like expectations of going to the
Super Bowl. It will be interesting to see what SF does for nexted year
because under the new agreement they can protect one franchise player and
match offers against 2 others. You know that Jerry Rice will be one of
these three, fer sure. They will probably only protect one of the QBs and
I can't see them risking getting nothing for EITHER Montana or Young.

TTom
9.112PBST::BROWNAre you a Turtle?Tue Jan 19 1993 19:0714
	Well Mike your allowed an opinion also. What I saw on replay had Smith 
past the line of scrimmage were the LB's hang out with a 9er grabbing him. Since
neither one of us can prove it and the ref called it it stands, so what. One
play does not make the whole game. Would you be making the same complaint
if it had been the other way, I doubt it so WTF does it matter anyway.

  Heres to hoping for a exciting stupid bowl no matter who wins.

  Cadzilla

   P.S.  Mike  Here's to your  long and continuous hate of the Cowboys  

        
9.113PFSVAX::JACOBPgh. is no longer 'PAPERLESS'Tue Jan 19 1993 19:598
    
>>I believe that they stop the clock only if the team made a first down and they
>>have to move the chains. I concur with Saw that it was Pierce Holt and there's
    
    The clock only stops for the chains being moved in college football.
    
    JaKe
    
9.114CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Jan 19 1993 20:045
If SF has to protect Rice and two others, I could see someone like the
Giants trying to grab John Taylor.  Now there is a good WR.  (And I think
he's eligible, right?)

'Saw
9.115METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Jan 19 1993 20:053
Is Rice's contract up at the end of the season??

The Crazy Met
9.116PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 19 1993 20:107
    I wouldn't be surprised that the clock is stopped if the refs have to
    take time to spot the ball.  How would you feel if your team couldn't
    get off the last play because the refs were trying to get back the
    football that had been rolled away by a defender or if there was some
    question as to the proper spot.  Moving the chains can be done while
    the play is in action, but you can't play until the ball is in
    position.
9.117GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseTue Jan 19 1993 21:079
    The clock stops if a defender touches the ball, but not for the
    placement from an offensive player. If the ball was rolled away or if
    it was "kicked" by a defensive player, then the clock stops. But, as a
    Cowboy fan would say, it doesn't matter because the Cowboys won.
    
    Many ;*)
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.119maybe next year 9'rs, HA!QUASER::JACKSONTAEveryone/thing needs a nameWed Jan 20 1993 01:5422
      I thought Rice signed a 4 year contract worth 8-11 mil? Rice is not a
    franchise player IMO.  He's great, but not the team.
    
      When I saw the clock being stopped,  it looked like the down marked
    was being moved, and once that was in place and the proper down was
    shown,  the ref started the clock.
    
      The defensive holding was questionable,  but Smith was past the line
    of scrimmage by 2-3 yards.
    
      I think if there was biasing going on,  you would think that it would
    happen in the SB especially.  The reason why I say that is the SB is
    americas largest watched single event.  Supposedly the SB is getting
    watched less and less do to the NFC always winning,  so if biasing was
    going to happen,  the AFC should win which will keep people atracted to
    the SB,  thus more TV and other $$$$.  Does that make sense?
    
      BTW,  I don't believe biasing is happening in footaball.
    
       Heres to a good SB!!!
    
      Tim
9.120CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Jan 20 1993 11:415
I've seen them stop the clock because the defense is taking its sweet
time getting back across the line.


'Saw
9.121CNTROL::CHILDStake me to Roslyn CafeThu Jan 21 1993 11:028
Yabbut I think when they went to running time until the last five minutes of
the half that they could stop it to move the chains? 

Tim, Rice not a franchise player? I strongly diagree with that one. This isn't
a team in the league that wouldn't bid on him. He's the best in the game and he's
not a franchise player???

mike
9.122PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 21 1993 13:421
    Under the new agreement, who defines "franchise player" anyway?
9.123CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 21 1993 14:0419
>    Under the new agreement, who defines "franchise player" anyway?

Each team can designate one player that they feel is their franchise
player.

His contract has to be within the top 5% (?) of the other players
at that position, or else be a 20% increase.

He is the franchise player for the length of his contract.


Basically that means each team's GM decides what franchise player is....


hth,
'Saw


PS  I probably messed up some of the details......
9.124GOMETS::mccarthyMike McCarthy MRO4-3/C19 297-4531Thu Jan 21 1993 14:224
I thought the frachise player had to be paid at least the average
of the top 5 at his position.

Mike
9.125CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Jan 21 1993 14:509
>I thought the frachise player had to be paid at least the average
>of the top 5 at his position.

Yeah, that's it.

I was working from an increasingly senile memory.....;^)


'Saw
9.126current contractsHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortFri Jan 22 1993 14:1215
The franchise player is like the protected player during expansion. The
other teams can't bid for his services.

What's unclear to me is how current contracts come into play. Someone
asked if'n Jerry Rice. For any player under current contract, all this
new stuff doesn't apply until the end of the contract term, at least as I
understand it. That's why a team gets the franchise player clause along
with the "restricted" free agents for the nexted 2 or 3 years.

One other aspect of the agreement is that it settles all current and
pending law suits and the players involved with those suits cannot be
protected either as a franchise player or a restricted free agent.
They're immediately free to negotiate with anyone for a new contract.

TTom
9.127CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsFri Jan 22 1993 14:1514
I believe I heard that a team does not need to name a franchise player
either.

Suppose Jerry Rice had a year to go on his contract, and San Fran wanted
to name him their fp.  If they name someone else, perhaps when Rice is
eligible to be fp, he can't be.

So they name no one until Rice is eligible....


Or that's how I figure it....


'aw
9.128Rice in Denver?QUASER::JACKSONTAEveryone/thing needs a nameFri Jan 22 1993 17:0316
      Under the franchise definition a few replies ago,  Rice would be a
    franchise player,  but my definition is a player that the team can't
    win without or close to it.
    
      I think that SF can still win without Rice.
    
    
      Don't get me wrong though,  Rice is great!  But not the TEAM.
    
      Elway is Denver.  Yes it still takes team effort,  but he proved he
    is Denver Broncos when he went out for 4 weeks this past year.  I'm
    sure I'm not the only one who will say this,  but maybe the only one
    that will state it here and will take the abuse that will come with
    it;^).....
    
      Tim
9.129but what about QB?HBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortFri Jan 22 1993 17:094
The problem that San Fran has is not with Rice but what they're going to
do about who's playing QB: Montanan or Young.

TTom
9.130ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Fri Jan 22 1993 17:575
    SF's QB is Young. I don't think that thre is much debate about that
    within the team - the fans might be another story.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.131Pro Bowl RostersPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 22 1993 18:1952
                               AFC
                             Offense
        Wide receivers -- Anthony Miller, San Diego; Haywood Jeffires,
Houston.
        Tackles -- Richmond Webb, Miami; Howard Ballard, Buffalo.
        Guards -- Mike Munchak, Houston; Carlton Haselrig, Pittsburgh.
        Centers -- Bruce Matthews, Houston.
        Tight ends -- Keith Jackson, Miami.
        Quarterbacks -- Dan Marino, Miami.
        Running backs -- Barry Foster, Pittsburgh; Thurman Thomas,
Buffalo.
                             Defense
        Ends -- Bruce Smith, Buffalo; Leslie O'Neal, San Diego.
        Tackle -- Cortez Kennedy, Seattle.
        Outside linebackers -- Derrick Thomas, Kansas City; Bryan Cox,
Miami.
        Inside linebackers -- Junior Seau, San Diego; Vince Brown,
New England.
        Cornerbacks -- Rod Woodson, Pittsburgh; Gill Byrd, San Diego.
        Safeties -- Henry Jones, Buffalo; Willie Oliver Miami.
                           Specialists
        Punter -- Montgomery, Houston.
        Kicker -- Stoyanovich, Miami.
        Kick returner -- Clarence Verdin, Indianapolis.
                               NFC
                             Offense
        Wide receiver -- Jerry Rice, San Francisco; Sterling Sharpe,
Green Bay.
        Tackles -- Gary Zimmerman, Minnesota; Rusty Wallace, San Francisco.
        Guards -- Guy McIntyre, San Francisco; Nate Newton, Dallas.
        Centers -- Mark Stepnoski, Dallas.
        Tight ends -- Jay Novacek, Dallas.
        Quarterbacks -- Steve Young, San Francisco.
        Running backs -- Emmitt Smith, Dallas; Barry Sanders, Detroit.
                             Defense
        Ends -- Reggie White, Philadelphia; Chris Doleman, Minnesota.
        Tackles -- Pierce Holt, San Francisco.
        Outside linebackers -- Rickey Jackson, New Orleans; Wilber
Marshall, Washington.
        Inside linebackers -- Sam Mills, New Orleans; Vaughan Johnson,
New Orleans.
        Cornerbacks -- Audray McMillan, Minnesota; Eric Allen, Philadelphia.
        Safeties -- Todd Scott, Minnesota; Brad Edwards, Washington.
                           Specialists
        Punter -- Rich Camarillo, Phoenix.
        Kicker -- Morten Andersen, New Orleans.
        Kick returner -- Johnny Bailey, Phoenix.


    
    
9.132PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 22 1993 18:191
    I'll bet alot of teams wish they had the QB problem SF has.
9.133QUASER::JACKSONTAEveryone/thing needs a nameFri Jan 22 1993 20:575
      Shannon Sharpe is replacing the injured Keith Jackson at Tight end. 
    I thought this was strange, 'cause he plays mostly H-back or Wideout.
    
       Ti
    
9.134PARVAX::WARDLE_MSat Jan 23 1993 11:023
    Gee, no Jets on the team. You must have made a mistake, Mac.
    
    JoJ_NOT
9.135Jackson?CSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketMon Jan 25 1993 15:128
>>      <<< Note 9.133 by QUASER::JACKSONTA "Everyone/thing needs a name" >>>

>>      Shannon Sharpe is replacing the injured Keith Jackson at Tight end. 
    
What happend to Jackson?  Did he get hurt in the AFC Championship
game, or is he just pulling a Fran Tarkenton?

Jerry
9.136BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingMon Jan 25 1993 15:135
    
    Hey guys, what time is the kickoff for the SuperBowl?  Not the pregame
    crap, just the kickoff.
    
    Thanks.......Glenn
9.137FDCV07::KINGThe Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!Mon Jan 25 1993 15:403
    6:18 EST...
    
    REK
9.138CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Jan 25 1993 15:491
I hope Carl Lewis doesn't sing the National Anthem!
9.140CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Jan 25 1993 16:4613
>    Nope. Garth Brooks is gonna follow in Whitney Houston's footsteps and
>    lip-sync it.


I can deal with Garth Brooks....


As to the lip-syncing, I these cases where they are playing in a 
large arena, I don't necessarily think it's bad.  Sometimes the echo
lag can be really difficult to deal with......


'Saw
9.141DEC sending students to Super BowlPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 25 1993 16:5734
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+TM                                                   ----------- 
|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|                     U.S. News                         LIVE WIRE
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                                                     ----------- 
                    Digital to host students at 1993 Super Bowl 

  When the Dallas Cowboys play the Buffalo Bills in Super Bowl XXVII next 
  Sunday, a special group of spectators will be cheering on the teams.  This 
  year, 50 outstanding students from the 95th Street Preparatory School in Los 
  Angeles will be Digital's guests at the game.

  Digital adopted the school as a community relations project several years 
  ago.  The ongoing relationship with the school involves a variety of mentor 
  programs focused on scholastic excellence. Digital's efforts have included 
  programs designed not only to help students stay in school, but to help them
  excel.

  As the vendor of choice for the NFL and the supplier of all the computer 
  equipment for the league, Digital was allocated 30 ticket packages to the 
  1993 Super Bowl.  After Digital advised the NFL that it would invite 
  students from the 95th Street Preparatory School, the NFL, impressed with 
  Digital's involvement with the school, offered an additional 20 tickets so 
  more could participate in the event. 

  In addition to being special guests of Digital at the Super Bowl, the 
  students will be provided with Digital logo hats and T-shirts, attend 
  several events, and will participate in the halftime show, which stars 
  Michael Jackson. 

  The 1993 Super Bowl will be broadcast on NBC.




                          (Courtesy of U.S. Communications)
9.142DEC/NFL to team on LA Kids programPLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Mon Jan 25 1993 17:0082
Juleigh Rawlings
(714) 261-4520
     								    
     


              DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION SELECTED BY
             NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE AS CHOICE COMPUTER
           PARTNER IN LOS ANGELES YOUTH EDUCATION PROJECT


LOS ANGELES, CA -- January 25, 1993 -- Digital Equipment Corporation 
today announced it has joined the National Football League (NFL) as 
a partner in its Youth Education Town project to be built in south 
central Los Angeles, CA. 
     The youth enrichment project will replace the Watts/Willowbrook 
Youth Education Training center, which was severely damaged during 
the 1992 Los Angeles riots. The goal of the NFL project is to 
provide a "safe haven" where the area's at risk youth can enjoy fun 
recreation and educational tools. 
     Digital, the fastest growing PC vendor in 1992, according to 
Computer Intelligence, a computer industry analyst firm, will 
provide the nonprofit community project with $100,000 in personal 
computers and maintenance. The Digital personal computers will be 
used in the computer classroom, computer library, education 
laboratory, administrative computing department and weight room.
     These personal computer systems will be used to develop basic 
computer skills and allow the students to use them as a learning 
tool. In addition, the computers will be used in the administrative 
areas of the center for inventory purposes and database management. 
A special use of the personal computers will be to track the 
students' physical development.


     In addition to providing personal computers for the center, 
members of Digital's Los Angeles Community Relations Committee will 
volunteer at the center as mentors to the students. 
     This effort by Digital reflects a long history of corporate 
involvement and service in the many communities across the world and 
a desire to improve the quality-of-life in those communities. 
     In the Los Angeles area, Digital continues to work with the 
community to assist students in many areas, including education. 
Digital adopted the Los Angeles 95th street preparatory school 
several years ago and has created a variety of mentor programs 
focused on scholastic excellence. Digital's efforts with the school 
have included programs designed not only to help students stay in 
school, but also to help students excel in school. 
     In the process of selecting Digital as a partner for the NFL 
Youth Education project, the NFL learned of Digital's personal 
involvement with the Los Angeles 95th Street preparatory school. 
Based on the effectiveness of the mentor programs, the NFL has asked 
Digital to host 50 top achievers from the Los Angeles 95th Street 
preparatory school at the 1993 SUPERBOWL. In addition, the students 
have been asked to participate in the Michael Jackson halftime show, 
entitled, "Heal the World."
     Reggie Williams, Director of the NFL Education Youth Town 
Project said, "Together with Digital Equipment Corporation, we are 
proud to be able to assist in these community programs and encourage 
other members of the business community to join Digital in selected 
initiatives through co-participation, collaboration and replication 
of community programs."						    


     Digital Equipment Corporation, headquartered in Maynard, 
Massachusetts, is the leading worldwide supplier of networked 
computer systems, software and services.  Digital pioneered and 
leads the industry in interactive, distributed and multivendor 
computing.  Digital and its business partners deliver the power to 
use the best integrated solutions - from desktop to data center - 
in open information environments.
                               ####

Note to Editors:  Digital is a trademark of Digital Equipment
     		  Corporation.

CORP/93/984



To Distribution List:

<sacrificed to the disk space god of CAM3>
9.143The Super BowlFRETZ::HEISERBillary takes U.S. hostageWed Jan 27 1993 18:5756
    {found this on the net...}
    
    Help convince NBC to put domestic violence awareness public service
    announcements on during the superbowl!  (talk about reaching a lot of
    your target audience...)
                             
    For political activists, or media watchdogs, or just concerned women,
    here's a quick something you can do to help prevent and stop domestic
    violence.

    Super Bowl Sunday - which this year is January 31, here in southern
    California at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena - is the single worst day for
    domestic violence in the USA.  There is an increase of as much as 40%
    in the volume handled by domestic violence shelters on this day.  

    To try to stem this tide of violence, the Women's Action Coalition
    (WAC) of Los Angeles is supporting the campaign by Fairness and
    Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) to convince NBC (the network carrying the
    game) to carry two Public Service Announcements on domestic violence
    during the Super Bowl this year.  Anna Quindlen of the New York Times
    wrote a fine editorial in the 1/17/93 edition of the Times supporting
    this effort as well.  

    What I am asking of you - and all your friends (please PLEASE
    cross-post this to _any_ lists you can think of) - is to help us with a
    FAX/LETTER blitz on NBC, asking for these PSA's.  Here is a sample
    letter:
    
Dick Ebersol
President, NBC Sports
NBC
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY  10112

Dear Mr. Ebersol:

We (I) support FAIR's request that you air two Public Service Announcements
on domestic violence during the Super Bowl game.  The Super Bowl is one of the
most widely viewed television events of the year; it is also the day, according
to women's shelters, when calls for help increase by as much as 40%.

Your broadcast of the Super Bowl will reach a huge audience.  By your airing
PSAs, NBC will be bringing to a national audience the critical and important
issue of domestic violence.

Sincerely,


To reach NBC by FAX:  212-664-5835.


    You can rephrase or rewrite this letter to your liking, but please FAX
    or write them immediately.

    Thanks for helping - you may save someone's life, or skeletal
    structure, or eyesight.
9.144PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 28 1993 16:086
    NBC will be airing domestic violence awareness public service
    announcements during he SuperBowl.  I think it will be aired during the
    pregame show.
    
    This issue had alot of media attention today.  There was a segment on
    Good Morning America, and WBCN quoted an article from the Herald.
9.145FDCV07::KINGThe Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!Thu Jan 28 1993 17:044
    Oh BOY!!!  WBCN and The Hearld.... A couple of reliable sources
    if I never heard of one....

    REK
9.146AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlewFri Jan 29 1993 12:474
    	Once again Lisa Simpson loves her daddy so the Cowboys will
    win and cover.
    
    				/Don
9.147It's official!JURAN::MCKAYFri Jan 29 1993 14:4423
    Well I'm a bit out of my element over here in the NFL topic but
    what the hey.
    
    I am an unDOCUMENTED 26-2 in my lifetime picking the Super Bowl.
    It all started at the Age of 1 when my father put two rattles
    in front of me, one for the AFC and one for the NFC.  I chose the 
    correct rattle and the old man had a new system for picking the game!  
    
    This years game is a gift.  The MEN in charge are begging you to jump
    on America's team the Cowpokes and they are going to make a killing.
    I LOVE the Bills and the 6.5-7.  My guess is it will stay at 6.5
    due to the no push rule on Super bowls.  As an added bonus also jump
    all over the UNDER 44.5-45.  Again the no push rule will be
    in effect.
    
    If your man has all the fun side action here's my GUESS
    
    Who wins the coin toss?  DALLAS
    First field goal? BILLS
    First TD? DALLAS
    Who will score the first TD? Novacek
    
    I.M. Jimbo
9.148Thanky Jimbo. That's all I wanted to hear...AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlewFri Jan 29 1993 15:151
    
9.149METSNY::francusMets in '93Fri Jan 29 1993 15:2318
/Don and TCM have agreed to the following:

If Dallas fails to cover the spread against the Bills in SB XXVII
/Don will use the following p-name for one week

"LA Lakers - The Best Team Ever"

On the off-chance that Dallas covers 
TCM will use the following p-name for one week

"Certified Member - Larry Bird Jihad"

Both /don and TCM wish to state that they believe the p-names they 
will need to use to be lies, but as honorable men will fulfill the
terms of this "contract".

The Crazy Met (for /Donn)

9.150GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPCG Product ManagementFri Jan 29 1993 15:2810
   <<< Note 9.145 by FDCV07::KING "The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!" >>>

>    Oh BOY!!!  WBCN and The Hearld.... A couple of reliable sources
>    if I never heard of one....
>
>    REK
    
    This from one who thinks Hillary is a babe.  
    
    Mark.
9.151Jimbo are you related to Stu Feiner ???LUDWIG::GARRYDALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACKFri Jan 29 1993 15:4313
    re .147 Jimbo
    
    Jimbo you are 26-2 in SB's this is #27 so you are beginning to sound
    more and more like Stu Feiner and the rest of the guys that suck fools
    in to pay for selections....whats your number I think I might subscribe
    to your service for college hoop,whatever you give I'll go the other
    way and have a nice hefty bank acct  :')  :')  :')
    
    How can you like the under ???  the over is the smart play here and
    then you don't care who wins because its gonna be a shootout.
    
    Tom
    
9.152Yup, I agree to these terms.AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Jan 29 1993 15:4525
                    <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 9.149             The National Football League (NFL)             149 of 151
METSNY::francus "Mets in '93"                        18 lines  29-JAN-1993 12:23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/Don and TCM have agreed to the following:

If Dallas fails to cover the spread against the Bills in SB XXVII
/Don will use the following p-name for one week

 LA Lakers - The Best Team Ever

On the off-chance that Dallas covers 
TCM will use the following p-name for one week

"Certified Member - Larry Bird Jihad"

Both /don and TCM wish to state that they believe the p-names they 
will need to use to be lies, but as honorable men will fulfill the
terms of this "contract".

The Crazy Met (for /Donn)

9.153wing/ding ride???JURAN::WESTFri Jan 29 1993 16:0310
    
    re -.147 Mr.Mckay
    
    OK Jimbo, You say Buffalo and I'm all over the COWBOYS....plus the
    0ver.  Want to try your luck on a bucket of wing/dings?? 
    I'll even give you the 7....
    
    The Giants won...Washington pi**ed on them now it Dallas' turn to
    make the final DUMP and Flush....Cowboys 34....Buffalo 14....westy
    
9.154I yawn at himJURAN::MCKAYFri Jan 29 1993 16:118
    Taking you on Mr. West is like taking a beer away from /Don or
    Mr. Garry.  Make that giving a beer to /Don or Tom 8*)
    
    Your on.
    
    tiebreaker will be total points I'll go with 38
    
    Jimbo
9.155LUDWIG::GARRYDALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACKFri Jan 29 1993 16:2511
    
    
    re. -1
    
    I think he yawns at you Jim...I believe westy was treated to wing/dings
    via your wallet after the bowl picks .....right?????
    
    
    And just remember Jim NOBODY takes a beer from me.  :')  :')
    
    Tom
9.156winging and dinging Dallas to victoryJURAN::WESTFri Jan 29 1993 16:308
    
    Jimbo I say its an over game, you like the under so you can have 44
    and under I'll take 45 and over for the tie-breaker....why do you
    always pick 38?? Is that so you don't forget your waist size?? o'
    excuse me thats 42....but still an under....
    
    We won't need it as Dallas will CRUSH.....Westy
    
9.157LUDWIG::GARRYDALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACKFri Jan 29 1993 16:3710
    
    
    Wow westy your being nice to Jim..........he hasn't seen a 42 waist
    since college he's closer to 46   :')
    
    I think you are right about the over it will probably be over by
    halftime,the way Kelly has been passing he'll probably have 4 tds
    by half but only one will be buffalo's.
    
    Tom
9.158Buffalo 24 Dallass 20CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyFri Jan 29 1993 16:401
    
9.160METSNY::francusMets in '93Fri Jan 29 1993 16:5211
Number I got in the grid are not real good

Dallas 4  Buffalo 2 

4 winners based on score at the end of each quarter. OT does not count.

The 4 for Dallas is easy, 2 is a tough number to hit since it
usually requires a safety, missed extra point, stuff like that.
4 field goals is the only sort of easy way.

The Crazy Met
9.161slim fast poster childJURAN::MCKAYFri Jan 29 1993 17:006
    Tom I think your confusing your own waist size 46 with mine.
    I've been a 32 since high school.......oh OK 34 tops, well
    if I'm feeling heavy 36. 8*)
    
    Jimbo
    
9.162Slim Jim.. No WaySTRATA::GARRYDALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACKFri Jan 29 1993 17:096
    No confusing that Jim, I am a solid 44 and carry it well,you however
    are a minimum of 40 and it shows  :')  :')  :')
    
    Enough of that lets get back to football.
    
    Tom
9.164AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Jan 29 1993 17:154
    	Karen, I thought they were the respective Zip Codes of the Super
    Bowl participants.
    
    				/Don
9.166JURAN::MCKAYFri Jan 29 1993 18:543
    See I told you Buffalo would win, even Tommy is on the right side.
    
    Jimbo
9.16744? down to 36 by now right tom???JURAN::WESTFri Jan 29 1993 19:005
    
    TOM Garry...a 44??? what, the only 44 you can carry well is the 2-cases
    from Rockys minus the 4 beers you drank on the way home....
    
    westy
9.168PFSVAX::JACOBFri Jan 29 1993 19:0611
    Seeing that Michael Jackson is doing the halftime show, they'll have
    arough time getting the players back on the field fer the second half
    and have to postpone the game cause everybody'll be wretching.
    
    Jackson's complexion is now more like that of someone who was
    pronounced dead, and expertly embalmed.
    
    21-21 tie, with no second half till the pro bowl.
    
    JaKe
    
9.169Guess I'll put in a prediction...BSS::JCOTANCHFri Jan 29 1993 19:106
    Luckalo (finally) comes back to reality.
    
    Cowboys 35, Bills 23
    
    
    Joe
9.170Dallas in a blowoutPULMAN::HEIERFri Jan 29 1993 19:205
    Everyone seems so hyped out on Buffalo....I am going to follow the
    trend of the past 8 years and say Dallas 41  Buffalo 13....I 
    just don't think the AFC can compare with the NFC.
    
    Larry
9.171DALLAS 31 - BUFFALO 17DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Fri Jan 29 1993 20:091
    
9.172DECWET::METZGERDoughnuts. Is there anything they can't do?Fri Jan 29 1993 21:5014
As much as I hate to see Dallas win I think their offensive line will dominate 
the buffalo defense. The game will appear close because Dallas will run over
the bills with several time consuming drives so that it won't appear to be
the blowout that it is. 

Dallas will totally dominate the 2nd half with Novacek catching 3rd down passes
any time he feels like it for first downs.


Dallas 24 buffalo 10


Metz who would much rather see buffalo win.
9.173FDCV06::KINGThe Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!Fri Jan 29 1993 23:344
    Buffy the Cowgirlymon killer 34
    Cowpokes                     20
    
    REK
9.174CSC32::M_MACGREGORFri Jan 29 1993 23:4115
    
    The ultimate football game.  I'd say that neither team will score
    and they have to go into the boring kick-off.  Where Dallas will win by
    a score of 5-4 with a trick kick into the upper left corner of the
    goal.  8^)
    
    I think it will be a one point game where the winning team in pinned at
    it's own 2 with 1:32 to go.  A fumble recovered by the left tackle, but 
    resulting in a safety to win the game.
    
    Who cares who wins the game, the Raiders would have kicked both their
    butts 8^)
    
    Marc
    
9.175PFSVAX::JACOBFri Jan 29 1993 23:5612
    
    >>Who cares who wins the game, the Raiders would have kicked both their
    >>butts 8^)
    
    >>Marc
    
    Uh, excuse me Marc, I think you need to move this to the Sports.Joke
    note, and the statement sure is funny.
    
    
    JaKe
    
9.176PREDICTING DALLAS, want Buffalo....CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeSat Jan 30 1993 13:4520
    
    I've been to Buffalo,  I've been to Dallas.
    
    Dallas has better wimmin.    :^)
    
    Noo Yawk has higher taxes and colder weather and they are near and dear
    to TcM's heart.
    
    I'm predicting Dallas.  !!!!
    
    Experts are saying ~44 points toital? (<-3 stooges vocabulary)
    
    No way!
    
    I say total points 17 +/-3
    
    I remain,
    soitnly low!
    Kev
    
9.177AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSMon Feb 01 1993 11:5212
    On behalf of the Cowboys, who are celebrating their victory, Iwill
    accept all the congratulatory messages from the SPORTS community.
    
    The rout was a marvel to watch, although I must admit, I did feel
    extremely sad for the Bills.  Out of the QB class of '83 I have always
    felt he was the best of the lot.
    
    More later,
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
    
    
9.178CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Feb 01 1993 12:0118
I think the thing that has to be said (as a Giants fan) is not congrats
to the Sowboys [isfh], but a big pat on the back to the NFC East.

Winning 3 of the last 5, and 5 of the last 7, you've got to look at that
division as the dominating division of the last few years.


Personally, I had hoped to see a better game.  I was not rooting for
anyone, not particularly caring for either team, but by midway into the
second quarter, instead of reading my book during the commercials, 
I was reading during the game, and waiting for the commercials.  8^)


Those Bills players must be TOTALLY dejected today.  Wonder what major
shakeups will take place in that organization....


'Saw
9.179CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Feb 01 1993 12:0219
Lost amidst the Super Bowl Shuffle:


	Five new folks were inducted to the Hall of Fame:

		Bill Walsh
		Dan Fouts
		Walter Payton
		Larry Little

	and one other coach whose name escapes me.


Jackie Smith (former Cardinal and Cowboy TE) was on the ballot but was
not elected....



'Saw
9.180ROYALT::ASHEIt's big, heavy, it's wood...Mon Feb 01 1993 12:212
    Hope JaKe doesn't come looking for you 'Saw...
    
9.181CAMONE::WAYShe left me a mule to rideMon Feb 01 1993 12:2210
>    Hope JaKe doesn't come looking for you 'Saw...


That's it, Chuck Noll....Sheesh, how could I have forgotten Chuck Noll?

Oh, I know, I was so busy remember what Jake owes me for beer 8^)


'Saw    

9.182ROYALT::ASHEIt's big, heavy, it's wood...Mon Feb 01 1993 12:297
    I thought Dallas would win, but wanted Buffalo.  
    
    Leon Lett's my new hero... nice TD run.. NOT...
    
    SB XXVIII:  Philly 76, Buffalo 3?
    SB XXXIX:   Phoenix 84, Buffalo 2?
    
9.183'specially on the 1 yard lineCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeMon Feb 01 1993 12:379
    
    Oh yeah, Dallas didn't do any face-mask grabbing either, right?
    
    NOT!
    
    I remain,
    seeing at leasst 3 without my spec's on!
    Kev
    
9.184GENRAL::WADEone step ahead of the jailer...Mon Feb 01 1993 12:427
    
    	Anybody want to try and explain to me how the coach/player
    	talent level is so totally lopsided in favor of the NFC?
    
    	This is getting ridiculous........
    
    Claybroon
9.185CAMONE::WAYShe left me a mule to rideMon Feb 01 1993 12:5115
>    	Anybody want to try and explain to me how the coach/player
>    	talent level is so totally lopsided in favor of the NFC?
>    
>    	This is getting ridiculous........
    
I may be WAY off base, but I seriously think it's the defenses.  I think
that the NFC defenses are better, and I do believe that defense wins
championships....


Plus, no matter how good your players are, if you turn it over NINE
times, you ain't gonna win.....


'Saw
9.186How 'bout those Cowboys!!!!BSS::JCOTANCHMon Feb 01 1993 13:0521
    Couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch - I'd give my right arm for a
    Buffalo newspaper this morning.  Heh, heh, heh...
    
    I absolutely LOVED this one.  The only bad part was that Dallas didn't
    get another score (or course, they *should* have) to break SF's record
    of 55 points.  
    
    After just about every Super Bowl, people start talking about a
    dynasty, but it's almost a certainty this time.  This team took two
    steps at a time in getting to the top, and IMO there will be at least 2
    more Vince Lombardi trophies in Dallas over the next 4 years.
    
    I couldn't be happier for JJ.
    
    The Jordan-Bird commercial was hilarious.
    
    
    
    Joe
    
    
9.188AFC = Almost Football ConferencePBST::BROWNAre you a Turtle?Mon Feb 01 1993 13:152
	
9.189Supe ramblings...TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is THREE years old!!!Mon Feb 01 1993 13:1822
Early on I actually thought that Buffalo was going to win.  They were working
their defensive scheme really well, and it was giving their linebackers some
really good shots at the QB and RBs.  The problem was that the offense didn't
control the ball.  The key to the defense was the linebackers getting openings
and using their speed to get to them.  With the D on the field so much, they 
couldn't keep the pace up, and were tired by the second quarter.

As for Dallas' part, their outside linebackers and defensive backs were reading
the plays really well, especially the runs.  Every  tackle on the running plays 
seemed to have an outside backer and d-back in on it.

And of course the biggest factor was turnovers.  How a team could make it to 
the Supe, and make so many mistakes, I'll never know.

That guy Lett is a jerk, and didn't deserve the TD.  You simply DON'T celebrate
until you are in the zone.

Po' po' Buffalo - three in a row.

=Bob=

BTW - does anyone have the score by quarter (for my block pool, ya know)
9.190Kelly really sipsCTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyMon Feb 01 1993 13:4211
    Kelly, Levy, Bruce Smith and Reich sip. Throw OJ in there.
    
    Dallas was great, but let's be careful about an annointment. 
    
    MikeL
    
    Oh did I say that Michael Jackson sips. Androgynous (sp) crotch grabber
    wannabee.
    
    Thermal Thomas sips too.
    
9.191AFC are losers because their whole approach is losing footballNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 01 1993 13:4231
    
    Troy Aikman is God!  Not that he had to be after halftime, but he was,
    both before and after.  After that it was time for Emmitt Smith to take 
    over in cleanup duty, making the Bills' defense with Will McDonough's
    "best linebacking crew ever" (ha!) look very bad indeed.  But agreed, 
    not as bad as Buffalo's offense looked.  I think it might be time for 
    Jim Kelly to move on.  He was intensely pressured but the guy just never 
    seems to be able to perform under that pressure, making bad decision 
    after bad decision under duress.
    
    I thought the momentum in the game totally shifted when the gutless
    Marv Levy basically threw his hands up on his second 4th-and-less-than-
    one-yard situation in two drives and said "you guys showed that you're
    too strong for us down here in the trenches, so I'm going to kick the
    field goal to save face" (not to mention that the Kelly rollout on the 
    previous drive's 4th down was a horrible call with even worse execution-- 
    is Buffalo so unconfident in their offensive line that a big guy like 
    Kelly can't stick his head in there to pick up six inches?).  Typical 
    playing not to lose and ending up the loser NFL coaching mentality,
    where the coach justifies the decision by spouting the old cliche "we 
    couldn't come away empty" (3 points, whoopee) and the players' spirits 
    flag accordingly (contrast that decision with Johnson's to go for it on
    4th-and-four from the Buffalo 40 with a *three TD lead* and almost 
    nothing to gain from the move except his players' self-confidence).  
    Before that series of downs it looked like the teams might go in at 
    halftime tied 14-14, but the Buffalo bubble quickly deflated under 
    Marv's coaching bravado and instead it ended up 28-10, game over, when 
    the gun sounded.
    
    glenn
    
9.192Pitchers and catchers report in < 4 weeksMETSNY::francusCertified Member-Larry Bird JihadMon Feb 01 1993 13:5310
re: 2nd 4th and 1, the second was more like 4th and 3.

re: .186 and dynasty

Well as a Mets fan I recommend that you not start shouting dynasty yet. 1986
Mets had a good very young team and never put it all together again. Sure Dallas
might, but strange things can happen, especially with free agency.

Mets in '93
The Crazy Met
9.193QUASER::JACKSONTAQuit dancin' on that table!Mon Feb 01 1993 13:581
      Is the crow cafe busy this morning?
9.194Bill's won't be baaaaack BUMP::MMARLANDMon Feb 01 1993 14:0814
    Hat's off to the Boys'. Great win, huge win, the Bill's will be a few
    years before they dare come back for more of this. Kind of ironic,
    though, in 2 Super Bowls that never happened, I think if the 49er's
    beat the Giants 2 years back, and Dallas this year the Bill's would be
    2-1. Anyways, I think Mike Ditka said it best, that this team has the
    potential for greatness IF they continue as a team. With the new free
    agency not sure what will happen. Dallas has a lot of big play big
    dollar players and not sure if the payroll can keep em all on the same 
    side of the field in years to come.
    
    Bud Bowl fun as always, should have ended with a call from the blimp
    saying "I'll be baaaack"
    
    Mike  
9.195NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 01 1993 14:1110
    
> re: 2nd 4th and 1, the second was more like 4th and 3.
    
    You sure about this, TCM?  The ball was at around the three but I 
    thought the Bills could pick up the first at around the two and didn't 
    have to score.  If it truly was 4th-and-3 then I was being too harsh 
    on Levy...
    
    glenn
    
9.196did anybody win one?GENRAL::WADEone step ahead of the jailer...Mon Feb 01 1993 14:156
    
    	Well, I count the QB class of '83 as 0-9 in the big game.  Is
    	that right?  I've got Elway 0-3, Kelly 0-3, Eason 0-1, Marino
    	0-1, and Boomer 0-1.....
    
    Claybroon
9.197CADSYS::CAVEMon Feb 01 1993 14:2830
    I totally agree with Glenn about Marv Levy's/Buffalo's poor 
play selection on the two series inside the 5 yard line.  The first fourth 
down call was a joke.  I also blame Kelley for not changing the play
when he noticed that Dallas brought in an extra DB.  I thought a QB
sneak should be able to gain 1 foot.  The 49ers had two successful
sneaks in the NFC championship game.  Both sneaks came with noone in
their backfield (it was ovbious Young was going to QB sneak).  I realize
Young is a great runner but Kelley is also a big guy and should be able
to pick up the yardage.  The other poor play selection came on the second
series when Buffalo again needed a yard and did a slow developing
misdirection play.  This gave the fast Cowboy D time to penetrate and
throw Buffalo for a loss to the 3 yard line.  Misidrection is fine
outside the 3 but within a yard you have to pound it in or play fake
if the defense is giving it to you.

    Everyone seems to be praising Norton for this excellent play.  Although,
Norton did have a great game and made THE stop on Davis, I thought Haley
was HUGE.  He was constantly in Kelley's face and made an equally large
play causing the fumble that Jones? caught for the TD that gave Dallas 
a 14-7 lead.  This play, IMO, had a major impact because the Bill players
must have felt "Here we go again".

    I didn't think Dallas could AGAIN play a "near-perfect" game but
I was definitely proven wrong.  Maybe this level of play is their norm.




    
9.198METSNY::francusCertified Member-Larry Bird JihadMon Feb 01 1993 14:3511
Glen,

The Bill's had a 3rd and 1 on the 3 after a off-sides call against Dallas.
They then lost about 2 yards.

On the first 4th and goal I was very surprised to see a pass. If the Bills 
run and score that is ideal, but even if they are stopped or even fumble Dallas
is in awful field position. That pass was a lousy, lousy call.

The Crazy Met
9.199CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Mon Feb 01 1993 14:414
    The only bright spot was the man who coached the "no name Defense" can
    fergit this silliness and start coaching a real football team!!!
    
    Bring dave to 'ole Chi-ca-go...
9.200BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingMon Feb 01 1993 14:436
    
    The AFC won't win another Super Bowl until the Chargers do it.
    In other words, next year!
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
    
9.201FRETZ::HEISERthis present darknessMon Feb 01 1993 14:511
    Was McMahon from the class of '83?
9.203QUASER::JACKSONTAQuit dancin' on that table!Mon Feb 01 1993 14:521
      Very bold aren't ya Glenn?
9.204CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Mon Feb 01 1993 14:536
    The Super Bowl Tourny needs to be an NCAA style seed system...  I don't
    think I really care about NFC/AFC as much as I care about the right
    super bowl.
    
    It might be different if they didn't play so much interconference ball
    as they do today, unlike baseball...
9.205PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 01 1993 15:057
9.206XCUSME::CREWSWhat we have here is failure to communicateMon Feb 01 1993 15:213
    Heee heeeee heeeee, guess America's Team is back, eh boys? :-)
    
    -- Jim Bob
9.207ROYALT::ASHEIt's big, heavy, it's wood...Mon Feb 01 1993 15:388
    How do you get "Kellly (tm) sips" from yesterday?  He missed most of the
    game.  The fumble for a touchdown wasn't completely his fault.  Smith
    fumbled too, just happened that Aikman was behind him.  I'll give the
    INT to Everett was a bad one, but I can't blame this one on Kellly (tm).
    
    Reich had no time to prepare, and the defensive backfield got burnt.
    Turnovers were a key, but they couldn't stop the Novacek or Irvin
    and that was all she wrote...
9.208Buddy Ball in HoustonPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 01 1993 15:472
    Buddy Ryan was named as the defensive coordinator for the Houston
    Oilers.
9.209SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Feb 01 1993 15:4838
    
    
    	what I saw.  In other words, MY OPINION!
    
    
    	- The commercials were better than the game!  I was actually
    waiting for the commercial breaks!
    
    		a. Bird/Jordan commercial was a classic
    		b. Shaq/Reebok I'd rate second.
    		c. Lee Jeans had two decent commercials.  Came in 3rd IMO.
    
    	- The game stunk.  The Bills are now up there with the Donks and 
    the Vikes as the biggest flops in the 'Bowl.  I actually turned the
    game off in the 4th to watch a tape a friend brought over about
    Bird's career.
    
    	- Biggest turnaround in the game to me was Beebe dropping that
    sure TD pass in the endzone.  Second biggest play was the really stupid
    play calling by Buffalo inside the 5 the first time.  And here all 
    along, I thought the Steelers has the worst play calling inside the
    5.  I guess they've now been replaced!
    
    	- I can't remember who, but a couple of guys who wrote _99 Ressons
    to Hate the Dallas Cowboys_ or some such, were praying for a Dallas
    win because in their opinion, "there's a whole generation out there
    that doesn't know why we hate the Cowboys!"  Secondly, a Dallas win
    also guaranteed them another best-seller!
    
    	- Although the AFC has had a tough time of it lately, it was 
    the same only for the NFC during the 70's when the AFC bagged 7 of
    the titles.  Actually, between Buffalo and Denver, they have accounted
    for 6 of the 9 losses!  The AFC shall return, and quite possibly it
    will turn in their favor for a couple of years.
    
    
    bill..g.
    
9.210TORREY::MAY_BRHoof heartedMon Feb 01 1993 16:0111
    re NFC vs. AFC
    
    I don't think the AFC ever dominated the way the NFC now does. 7 in the
    '70's (4 [5?], as you know by an original NFL team), is nothing like
    eight in a row.  Even weith the aging of some of the NFC traditional
    powerhouses, I still think it's a couple years before we can see an AFC
    team that is competitive with what the NFC is putting out on the field. 
    Most of the last few games have been blowouts, further highlighting the
    disparity.
    
    brews 
9.211ROYALT::ASHEIt's big, heavy, it's wood...Mon Feb 01 1993 16:133
    Plus you get the argument that part of that was the Steelers and Colts,
    teams from the old NFL...
    
9.212CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowMon Feb 01 1993 16:2815
There was a recent article in the Courant talking about the NFC-AFC thing.

Of the last 7 AFC opponents, all ranked fairly high in offense, but mediocre
to poor in defense.   The NFC opponents were just the opposite, ranking
higher in defense than in offense.

The basic premise of the article was that while the AFC could put points
on the board, they weren't very good at stopping others from putting
points on the board.

*IF* I haven't recycled it yet, I'll look for the article and try to
type it in.....


'Saw
9.213QUASER::JACKSONTAQuit dancin' on that table!Mon Feb 01 1993 16:545
    Reich didn't have time to prepare?  He had 2 weeks, not to mention half
    time.  DAllas just dominated,  so no greatest SB comeback for
    Reich.........
    
      Tim
9.214You won't see this team running out the clock...BSS::JCOTANCHMon Feb 01 1993 17:1333
    Count me in as one who thinks Levy's playcalling was crazy.  I thought
    it was a bad decision passing up the FG, forget the actual horrendous
    call.  I know that's easy to say now, but it was early in the game,
    they were only down by 7, and they had more to lose my not making it
    than to gain by getting the tying TD.  
    
    I'm really impressed by the confidence with which the Cowboys play and
    are coached, even though I think JJ can be a little *too* outgoing at 
    times.  The 4th and 4 gamble wasn't too outrageous - chances are a punt
    would've sailed into the end zone and the Bills would've started at the
    20 anyway, a mere 15-yard gain by Dallas.  But the one I question goes
    back to the SF game when he went for it on 4th down with an 11-point
    lead.  With a 10-point lead, it would've been a good gamble, but with a
    chance to almost definitely push the lead to 2 TD's, you can't pass up
    the FG.  Even so, JJ's willing to take the risks and if his team
    doesn't make it, he's confident his defense will stop you and even if
    they don't he's confident that his offense will come right back at ya
    and score again.  And that confidence obviously filters down to his
    players.
    
    I loved it at halftime when Todd Christensen talked about his interview
    with JJ and Todd asked JJ if he reminded his players about Buffalo's
    game with Houston, and JJ responded "We're no Houston."
    
    One of the big plays of the game was when Dallas had the ball and was 
    leading 31-17 and the game was still within reach for the Bills.  The
    Cowboys were around midfield and were starting to give heavy doses of
    Emmitt Smith, apparently just working the clock, but Aikman play-faked
    and threw a beautiful pass to a wide-open Harper that pretty much
    signaled the end for the Bills.  Great call at a perfect time.
    
    
    Joe
9.215CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowMon Feb 01 1993 17:2911
RE Reich and being unprepared:

	Reich only took three snaps with the first string squad, 
	and thus, was unprepared.

	Now, who is to BLAM for that I don't know...Levy perhaps....


All I know is that Jim Kellly(tm) and the Billls(tm) are ranking right
up there with the greatest chokers of all time:  Worn Moon(tm) and
Snuffy Smif'.....
9.216How do you figure?CSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketMon Feb 01 1993 17:3615
>>   <<< Note 9.215 by CAMONE::WAY "Ok off the expressway, thru the window" >>>

>>All I know is that Jim Kellly(tm) and the Billls(tm) are ranking right
>>up there with the greatest chokers of all time:  Worn Moon(tm) and
>>Snuffy Smif'.....

How do you figure that Warren Moon is one of the greatest chokers of
all time.  Sure, he took part in the game that saw Buffalo make up
a 32 point deficit, but he wasn't on the field when they scored
any of their points.  I think you have to give the Oiler defense
credit for that.  Also, he did get them into field goal range late
in the game for an attempt that would have been the difference.  You 
giving him credit for the blown field goal attempt, too?

Jerry
9.217SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Feb 01 1993 17:4036
    
    
    	Let's see, in the 70's, Miami won 2, Steelers won 4, and Oakland
    won 1.  Can't remember, but didn't the Colts win in '70?
    
    	Now, I'll agree that the Steelers came from the old NFL but really,
    they were losers big time.  They were the laughing stock for some 40
    years of the NFL.  Buy the time they won it all in '74, I don't think
    anyone was left from the team before Noll came on board in '69 except
    Andy Russell.  Maybe one or two others, but you really can't say that
    just because the Steelers were part of the old NFL that they weren't
    in some way an AFC team.  On the other hand, the same can't be said
    about the Colts.  Other than that, the AFC did dominate the 70's
    big time.  And as someone earlier pointed out, defense was a key in
    just about every win and for sure, all the AFC teams that won in the
    70's had great defenses.
    
    	As for the last 8 won by the NFC, the streak could actually have
    been only 2 since two years ago, the Giants narrowly escaped when
    Buffalo missed that last second field goal by a gnats eyelash.  So,
    that game was not dominated by the NFC.
    
    	I would say though that there have been more blowouts over those
    last 8 games though but it could also be due to the fact that both
    the Giants and the 49'ers were great teams that overmatched their
    opponents, namely the Donks.
    
    	Sports is funny.  I like the system the NFL has right now and I'm
    sure the AFC will return shortly.  Even next year.  To many times,
    folks start this dynasty stuff after a big win and then next year,
    do to overconfidence, injuries, or luck, another team rises above
    the favorite.  Dallas has a good team, but in sports, anything can
    happen.
    
    bill..g.
    
9.218CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowMon Feb 01 1993 17:4222
>How do you figure that Warren Moon is one of the greatest chokers of
>all time.  Sure, he took part in the game that saw Buffalo make up
>a 32 point deficit, but he wasn't on the field when they scored
>any of their points.  I think you have to give the Oiler defense
>credit for that.  Also, he did get them into field goal range late
>in the game for an attempt that would have been the difference.  You 
>giving him credit for the blown field goal attempt, too?

Jerry.  Take a trip back through some of the archived versions of SPORTS
for references to Worn Moon(tm) and his failure to get them to the Dance.
In addition check references for things like Inflated Stats from the
R&S vis-a-vis his not being that great a QB etc etc etc....


But, he did toss up the inty when everything was on the line.....


The blown FG was the punters fault -- he was the holder who made up the
most exquisite excuses after the game......


'Saw
9.219wouldn't that be something!FRETZ::HEISERthis present darknessMon Feb 01 1993 18:022
    Maybe Parcells will teach the AFC a thing or two about defense over the
    next few years.
9.220I saw it differentlyCSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketMon Feb 01 1993 18:2134
>>               <<< Note 9.205 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>

>>    Dallas may have controlled Smitha and Talley,but they didn't handle
>>    Buffalo's pass rush very well in the first half.  Blitzing linebackers
>>    kept Aikman under pressure for most of the first half.  

I've been waiting for someone to jump on this, but it looks like it's
going to have to be me.  As I recall, Aikman threw three TD passes in
the first half.  One to Novacek and two to Irvin.  All three were from
about 20 yards out.

I'll agree that Dallas did a better job of handling Buffalo's pass rush
in the second half than they did in the first half, but by midway
through the second quarter they pretty much had things under control.
I recall Troy being rushed into a couple of poor throws (one that almost
got picked off), but I can't remember him even taking a sack (but I
won't swear to it).

The point is that the only way the the Bills could get any kind of
pass rush was to blitz, and this usually left Novacek open.  When
Dallas showed that they could beat the blitz with their short passing
game to Novacek, Johnston and Smith, Buffalo backed off.  When they
did this, their pass rush wasn't a factor.

They also quit playing bump and run on the wide receivers in the latter
parts of the second quarter and in the second half.  Aikman said (in
an interview this morning) that it was because they were successfull
with their short passing game.  You do have to wonder, though, if
Buffalo had stayed with the blizting game and the bump and run, what
Dallas would have done.  

Just my opinion, of course.

Jerry
9.221What consitutes a choker?CSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketMon Feb 01 1993 18:2929
>>   <<< Note 9.218 by CAMONE::WAY "Ok off the expressway, thru the window" >>>

>>Jerry.  Take a trip back through some of the archived versions of SPORTS
>>for references to Worn Moon(tm) and his failure to get them to the Dance.
>>In addition check references for things like Inflated Stats from the
>>R&S vis-a-vis his not being that great a QB etc etc etc....


>>But, he did toss up the inty when everything was on the line.....

'Saw,

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on what consitutes a
choker.  I remember all of the old arguments about R&S, and inflated
stats, but I don't see how this can have any bearing on Moon being
a choker.  As for him never taking his team to the big game, I'll concede
a little on that.  But it takes more than one player to win it all.
And if you're going to use that as your criteria, there's a lot of good
QBs that you'll have to label as chokers.

As for the interception in overtime against the Bills, I'm still
wondering why pass interference or defensive holding wasn't called.
I didn't get the best view of it, but a Houston reciever was definitely
tackled while the ball was in the air.  I guess the refs just figured
it was uncatchable, or already past the reciever, although it sure
wasn't obvious to me.  Regardless, I figure that played a part in
the interception.

Jerry
9.222TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is THREE years old!!!Mon Feb 01 1993 18:3115
re: .220 (Jerry)

My point earlier ties into what you were saying.

The defensive schemes devised by Buffalo were based on the linebackers 
blitzing the passer (you'll find that most NFL defenses blitz someone one
every play).  The openings they were creating called for the linebackers 
to cover a lot of ground.  When the Buffalo offense made their mistakes, it
made the defense stay on the field a long time, and the linebackers got tired
very quickly (hell, most of them were injured coming in).

As far as the bump and run coverage, perhaps it was the short passes, or maybe
the lack of a rush made the d-backs afraid to take chances.

=Bob=
9.223NFC offenses > AFC offenses, too...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 01 1993 18:4032
    
    > Count me in as one who thinks Levy's playcalling was crazy.  I thought
    > it was a bad decision passing up the FG, forget the actual horrendous
    > call.  I know that's easy to say now, but it was early in the game,
    > they were only down by 7, and they had more to lose my not making it
    > than to gain by getting the tying TD.  
    
    With a foot to go, Joe?  This is what I mean about AFC football of
    recent years.  Everyone concentrates on the defenses but I think it's 
    at least as much that the AFC offenses are overrated as their defenses 
    are suspect.  If a team doesn't have the offensive line play to pick up
    a foot when they need to, they're not going to win many games when they
    have to go up against a tough defense that isn't going to allow the
    automatic 300+ passing yards per game.  The game must be won at the
    line of scrimmage.  And when you're dominated at the line of scrimmage
    you get debacles like yesterday's game.

    I don't understand what you mean by the Bills had more to lose than to 
    gain by going for it in that situation.  The Bills had 7 points to gain 
    and only 3 to lose, and after they missed they were able to stop the 
    Cowboys and get right back into scoring position.  If your chances 
    are only 50% the percentages say go for the touchdown, and your chances 
    *should be* (if you have intelligent play-calling) much better than 50% 
    from the one-foot line.  The idea is to try to score more points than 
    the other team, not just to stay close and hope you get more such 
    golden opportunities.  In any case, I don't think football players come 
    off the field pumped up when they're unable to convert on three plays 
    inside the five and have to settle for a field goal.  It's almost as
    demoralizing as being stopped.
    
    glenn
    
9.224PFSVAX::JACOBBuffalo :== Denver BOTH SUCK IN SBMon Feb 01 1993 18:4425
    re.181
    
    'Saw, How much is the tab????
    
    Re the game
    That moron who ran back the fumble fer an almost TD, only to have Beebe
    knock it away at the lasted moment is an a-hole.  Cain't wait til he
    crosses the line to celebrate, has to hot dog it afore he gits there.
    Hope JJ reamed him good fer it.  What if the game was 24-24 and he did
    that??
    
    Re the commercials
    
    Who won the Bird/Jordan shoot-a-thon??  Loved that one, specially when
    they was on top of the building saying something like, "Off the
    freeway, off the billboard, thru the window.....etc."
    
    MY fave was the Lee Jeans one where the guy sucks the bird outta the
    cage.
    
    Was Dan Reeves acting as honorary coach of the Bills or sumthin'
    yesterday???  They played like a team under his command.
    
    JaKe
    
9.225PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 01 1993 18:508
9.226PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 01 1993 18:534
9.227CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowMon Feb 01 1993 18:5828
In reading Glenn's note, I was reminded of something an analyst said
during a game -- "It's easier to pass block than to run block".

It struck me that even with a good running back like Thurman Thomas,
the Bills don't seem to be a very good running team...not at least like
we'd think of some of the powerhouse running of the NFC (Giants, Redskins,
Cowboys, Chicago w/ Payton).

The Bills can pass, as can a lot of the teams in the AFC, but there
aren't any real running powerhouses the caliber of the NFC.   (Well, 
I take that back -- perhaps Pittsburgh and maybe KC).  The rest I think
of as passing teams, or as just plain crappy teams.



re Jake:

	I dunno big guy, you got of lucky, because when I got home
	with all the beer, a big gust of wind came along (something
	the weatherman called a Pittsburgh Clipper) and blew the
	sales slip away out of sight.....8^)


	No one won the Jordan/Bird contest.  The one on top o' the
	building was the lasted one.....


'SAw
9.228PFSVAX::JACOBBuffalo :== Denver BOTH SUCK IN SBMon Feb 01 1993 19:0210
    Well 'Saw,
    
    I'd rather owe it too ya than cheat ya out of it.
    
    (good thing ya didn't see me there with the wind tunnel fan)
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
9.229CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowMon Feb 01 1993 19:034
>    (good thing ya didn't see me there with the wind tunnel fan)
    
Did you notice how the wind blew through my crew cut?      

9.230PFSVAX::JACOBBuffalo :== Denver BOTH SUCK IN SBMon Feb 01 1993 19:0510
    Twas too dark to see the hair.  (8^)*
    
    Shoulda just paid the beer bill.  The plane ticket and fan rental were
    killer expensive.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
    
9.231PBST::BROWNAre you a Turtle?Mon Feb 01 1993 19:086

	FWIW  Ditka was the only one of NBC's colormen to pick Dallas. Of course
with the three Ex-AFC'ers and Will MCDontknow what could you expect.

Cadzilla
9.232CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Mon Feb 01 1993 19:0918
    Mebbe they did some type of news on this in a playoff game, and I 
    missed it...
    
    What the heck type of Hel-mutt did the Buffalo safety wear for that
    game.  I seem to remember he hurt his head/neck some time ago, it
    that big thing in relation to an injury.
    
    It looked like it had 1 1/2 inches of foam covering around the entire
    hel-mutt area. 
    
    I thought for sure it would have been mentioned in the game (I left at
    38 - 17) and missed it.
    
    He looked like the SPACEBALLS-Darth-Vandar clone.  Huge hel-mutt.
    
    Wut was the deal?
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.233DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Mon Feb 01 1993 19:1910
    re .225
    
        >>And all three of them came as a result of fantastic field position.
        >>When Dallas had to have a long drive to score, they couldn't do it
        >>(until the second half).
    
    If I'm not mistaken, Dallas had an 80 yard drive to make it
    21-10.  Correct me if I'm wrong.
    
     - Bob
9.234CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowMon Feb 01 1993 19:2022
9.235(tm) that Will McDontknow Cadzilla!GENRAL::WADEone step ahead of the jailer...Mon Feb 01 1993 19:221
    
9.236BSS::JCOTANCHMon Feb 01 1993 21:2123
>    I don't understand what you mean by the Bills had more to lose than to 
>    gain by going for it in that situation.  The Bills had 7 points to gain 
>    and only 3 to lose, and after they missed they were able to stop the 
>    Cowboys and get right back into scoring position.  If your chances 
>    are only 50% the percentages say go for the touchdown, and your chances 
>    *should be* (if you have intelligent play-calling) much better than 50% 
>    from the one-foot line.  The idea is to try to score more points than 
>    the other team, not just to stay close and hope you get more such 
>    golden opportunities.  

I just think by getting down there and taking the chance of coming away with
nothing is too demoralizing.  You need to get points on the board when you have
the field position, even if it might only be 3.  

Alot also depends on the particular situation.  If Buffalo was down by 21, they
have to go for it.

It was really a tough call either way, I just would've taken the sure field
goal.  


Joe      
9.237ROYALT::ASHEIt's big, heavy, it's wood...Mon Feb 01 1993 21:486
    Kazoo (from the Jetsons) helmet, not Gonzo (from Sesame Street or
    Trapper John) helmet.
    
    FWIW, 3 of 4 guys on ESPN Gameday picked Buffalo too.  But then, 1
    was an AFC player.
    
9.238I doubt they'll be back for a 4th straight shot...DECWET::METZGERDoughnuts. Is there anything they can't do?Mon Feb 01 1993 21:5930
Buffalo could play that game 200 times and still come up on the short end.
There is no way they were gong to stop Dallas with their defense. Despite what
the experts have said about Buffalo their defense has been marginal (at best)
over the past 2 seasons. Dallas, with it's power running game, short passing
game and decent long ball threat will always beat buffalo. 

Personally I think that the Tight End is the most underrated position in the
game. With a good tight end you open up the offensive possibilities 
exponentially. Add in a running back that can catch as well as run, and an 
offensive line where your young tackle handles the self proclaimed best lineman
in the AFC 1-1 without any problems all game and you have a sure fire blowout.

Buffalo and Levy should have know that they had to do something different on 
offense this game. If I was Levy I would have come out with two situational
packages on offense (a running set and a 3 wideout & TE set) and ran the no
huddle at full speed (1 play every 13 seconds..buffalo usually runs one every 
20-25 seconds) with at least one reciever running a deep fly every play. Don't
give Dallas any chance to set up the situational substitutions on defense or
sub in a defensive back. It probably would have killed their o-linemen though..

Got to do something different than go down in flames for the 3rd straight bowl 
in a row though....

I still don't see any AFc team with a chance at defeating the NFC in the next
two years. San Diego seems to be an up and comer but we'll have to see how they 
do against a 1st place schedule this year. I still think they are 2 years away
from being an NFC style power team with a great defense..

Metz
9.239FDCV06::KINGThe Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!Tue Feb 02 1993 00:144
    Miami Dolphin Running back Bobby Humphreys (sp) was arrested for
    cocaine today....
    
    REK
9.240CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Feb 02 1993 00:263
    (I think Kazoo was on the Flintstones, not the Jetsons)
    
    Now back to you regularly scheduled program...
9.241ELMAGO::BENBACAoDoTretteBgnihtynAevaHuoYt'noDTue Feb 02 1993 05:0313
    How sweet it is! Ya know it kinda makes me want to gloat. But I won't.
    However it does bring to mind  negative thoughts and opinions put in
    SPORTS over the last few years about JJ and the Cowboys. I am only going 
    to mention one...

    I don't remember who it was that said it but it was basically this.

   >> Jimmy Johnson will never make it in the NFL. In fact I say by the end
   >> of 1992 he will be back in the college coaching ranks.

    	This is not quite a quote but basically this is what this person
    said. All I can say is "Head ye to thee Crow Note!"  iffin you know who
    you are! :^)      GIT!!
9.242CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowTue Feb 02 1993 11:5926
re the Helmet:
	
	Okay, I stand corrected.  I couldn't really remember and gave
	it my bested guess.


Now:


I think the question begging to be asked is what are the Bills to do?

Do you think there should be some shakeup in the team?  I mean, they
are playing well enough to win the AFC Championship, and according to
most commentary I've heard, chances are that they will do it again, as
no one else has a clear shot to beat them.

But they are not playing well enough to stack up against the NFC (well
the NFC East let's say).

Does the team get shaken up, perhaps a couple of trades are made?


Opinions?  Comments?


'Saw
9.243mechanics....CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Feb 02 1993 12:1820
    
    Question:
    
    "How many Buffalllo Billls does it take to change a flat tire?"
    
    Answer:
    
    
    
    
    One, unless of course it's a blow-out, then the whole team shows up!
    
    
    
    ta boom!
    
    I remain,
    ahead of da pack on BB jokes, no?
    Kev
    
9.244UPI report on Super BowlPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 02 1993 13:1183
	PASADENA, Calif. (UPI) -- What is it about Super Bowls that turn the
	Buffalo Bills from a proud group of perennial conference champions into
	a band of bumblers?
	The Bills did it again Sunday, losing 52-17 to the Dallas Cowboys and
	setting NFL Super Bowl records for futility. The biggest one, of course,
	was losing their third straight. The other embarrassment was a Super
	Bowl-record nine turnovers.
	``We knew we were going to make history one way or another,'' Buffalo
	defense end Bruce Smith said. ``We just didn't want it to hapen this
	way. This is something we'll have to live with one day from now, in the
	offseason and the rest of our lives.''
	From now on, no one will think of the Bills as being named after
	those big, furry animals with the horns. BILLS has become an acronym for
	Boy, I Love Losing Super Bowls.
	The losses keep getting worse, going from a 1-point loss from the New
	York Giants to a 13-point drubbing by the Washington Redskins to
	Sunday's humiliation.
	``You always ask, 'Why, why do we deserve to lose the way we did
	today,''' Bills quarterback Jim Kelly asked.
	Why? Because they turned in one of the most sloppiest performances in
	Super Bowl history.
	``We're kind of a give-and-take offense,'' Cowboys tight end Jay
	Novacek said. ``If they're going to give it, we'll take it. Without the
	turnovers, it would've been a different story.''
	``You can't count on them,'' Dallas defensive coordinator Dave
	Wannstedt said of the Buffalo turnovers. ``We got them and took
	advantage.''
	How does a veteran team playing its third straight Super Bowl play so
	badly? This was a team that set an NFL record by overcoming a 32-point
	deficit to defeat Houston in the playoffs and had 10 players selected
	for the Pro Bowl. 
	The Bills tried to convince themselves the third time was a charm,
	but it became a streak.
	``Destiny, that word kind of floated around,'' Bills wide receiver
	Don Beebe said. ``I kind of thought we were going to win this game. The
	way we lost was very disheartening.''
	You can say the Super Bowl showed once again the disparity between
	the NFC and AFC, but the Bills were 4-0 against the NFC this season,
	including victories in San Francisco and New Orleans. That means they
	should have at least given the Cowboys a game on a neutral Rose Bowl
	turf.
	Except for Andre Reed, Buffalo's stars did not come through. Reed
	caught 8 passes for 152 yards, but he was abandoned by his teammates.
	Thurman Thomas, who has led the NFL in total yards a record-four
	straight seasons, was held to 19 yards rushing and 10 receiving. Wide
	receiver James Lofton, heading for the Hall of Fame, was shut out. Bruce
	Smith had one sack and Cornelius Bennett none.
	Kelly, a Pro Bowl quarterback, coughed up three turnovers in a
	quarter and a half.
	``We should've had 47 guys on this football team making plays,''
	Smith said. ``It just didn't happen. Each and every person on our team,
	and I'll start with myself, has to get better. Each and every one of us
	could've played better.''
	Kelly left with a knee injury in the second quarter, but that should
	not have have mattered so much. Backup Frank Reich engineered the
	Houston comeback and led the Bills past Pittsburgh in the second round
	of the playoffs. Reich looked briefly like he would rally Buffalo again,
	driving the Bills to a 21-yard Steve Christie field goal that made it
	14-10 on his first drive. He also found Beebe for a 40-yard TD at the
	end of the third quarter to make it 31-17.
	But even Reich ran out of miracles. He committed three fourth-quarter
	turnovers, including a Thomas Everett interception that set up a Dallas
	touchdown and a fumble Ken Norton returned for a score.
	Kelly wasn't much better. He threw two interceptions and had a fumble
	returned by Jimmie Jones for a touchdown.
	``It was a big disappointment,'' Kelly said, ``especially the way we
	lost.''
	After a rocky start, the Cowboys made few mistakes. Their first punt
	was blocked, putting them behind 7-0, but the Cowboys did not commit a
	turnover until the fourth quarter. Their stars like quarterback Troy
	Aikman, wide receiver Michael Irvin and running back Emmitt Smith,
	sparkled and their role players made impacts.
	As the youngest team in the league, Dallas appears poised to dominate
	the 1990s, like the San Francisco did the 1980s and the Pittsburgh
	Steelers the 1970s.
	As for the Bills, they go down as the kings of Super Bowl futitily,
	surpassing Minnesota and Denver.
	``To be classified as a great team,'' Lofton said, ``you really need
	to win the Super Bowl. I guess we're a real, real good team.''
	And they are filled with real, real broken hearts.


    
9.245more on Buffalo's pass rushCSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketTue Feb 02 1993 13:1419
A little extra information regarding Dallas not handling Buffalo's
pass rush in the first half.

The stats I just read (posted in the American_Football notes conference)
credits Buffalo with 1 sack, by Bruce Smith, for a 2 yard loss.  I remember
Bruce hitting Emmitt in the backfield in the 3rd quarter, and forcing
a fumble (recovered by Troy), but don't know if that's the sack.  Perhaps
someone can fill in the blanks.

Also, does anyone have the figures on hurries and knockdowns?  I can
recall at least one hurry, early in the game, on which Aikman threw
a bad pass, intended for Novacek.  I'm sure that there were others,
but just don't remember.  I also remember Buffalo almost getting an
INT, but it appeared to be a bad throw on Aikman's part rather than
the pressure forcing a bad throw.

Jerry

P.S.  Dallas is credited with 4 sacks, by 4 different players.
9.247GENRAL::WADEone step ahead of the jailer...Tue Feb 02 1993 15:006
    
    	What's the scoop on the relationship between Ken Norton and
    	Jr.?  He completely sidestepped a question concerning their
    	relationship.........
    
    Claybroon
9.249AXIS::ROBICHAUDTue Feb 02 1993 19:095
    	That pre-touchdown hotdog move by Lett cost Steve Kenney and
    I over a grand.  All the more reason to hate the Cowboys now that
    I'm through using them to make a little extra cabbage.
    
    				/Don
9.250Enough on Leon LettCSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketTue Feb 02 1993 21:0317
You guys ought to get off of Lett's back.  He played a good game with
the exception of 2 bonehead plays.  In my opinion, the roughing the
passing call on him early in the game was a lot more important, as
it was anybody's game at that point, and it kept a Buffalo drive
going.  All the blown TD did was effect some bets, and there's probably
as many folks who benefitted from it as not.

The guy is just 2nd or 3rd year, already had a sack, and was making
the play of his career.  The outcome of the game wasn't in doubt, so why 
not celebrate?  It was a stupid thing to do, but given the circumstance,
I can understand why he did it.  I lay odds that JJ didn't come down on him 
too hard, and now he has some training film material.  I'll also lay you odds
that Lett will never hot dog like that again.  Basically, it was a stupid way to
end a good play, and it didn't have any impact on the outcome of the
game.  Why don't you just leave it at that.

Jerry
9.251what a chump...DECWET::METZGERDoughnuts. Is there anything they can't do?Tue Feb 02 1993 21:185
Because he cost me $45? I had 9 and 7 for a square and he hotdogs food outta
the mouth of my family...

Metz
9.252Bett Lett don't do it again :^)ELMAGO::BENBACAoDoTretteBgnihtynAevaHuoYt'noDTue Feb 02 1993 22:329
    Iffin you want to blame somebody why don't you blame bb for being a
    hero and saving that touchdown from becoming a reality. Lett was only
    doing what a hell of a lot of other folks do when they think they are
    all alone going into the endzone. Yes it was a bone haided thing to do
    though. These line folks really don't know how to act when they score a
    touch down and he was just counting his chickens before they hatched is
    all :^)

    Ben 
9.253PFSVAX::JACOBM. Jackson=$39 Earl Scheib PaintJobTue Feb 02 1993 22:5614
    The guy moves with the blinding speed of grass growing, so why would he
    assume he was "all alone going into the end zone"????
    
    My grandmother coulda spotted that guy 45 yards and caught him in a
    hunnerd yard dash, and she's been daid for 16 years.
    
    If'n a guy wants to hot dog, that's fine, just get into the end zone
    before starting.  It was showbaoting, pure showboating.  He made
    himself look like the southerly facing end of a northbound horse.
    
    JMHO
    
    JaKe
    
9.254:*)(*:ELMAGO::BENBACAoDoTretteBgnihtynAevaHuoYt'noDTue Feb 02 1993 23:4410
    re -1
    
    I agree on your first point.
    I agree on your second point.
    However, he still could out run you :)
    
    In fact, you belong in the Crow Note for making that rediculus
    prediction a few years back that JJ would be back coaching the college
    ranks by the end of 1992. And for all your notes saying the cowboys
    would never make the super bowl while JJ was coaching. GIT!! 
9.255KevCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeWed Feb 03 1993 01:0413
    
    As a fan of track and field and a lover of races, I LOVED the way bb
    closed up the gap!
    
    The faux celebration was just to add drama - "izzy gonna make it before
    lett makes it?  C'mon dude, move!!!!!"
    
    Slasher, sorry for the misfortune - really.
    
    I remain,
    make no predictions, bet no money!
    Kev
    
9.256CELTIK::JACOBWed Feb 03 1993 01:2317
    
    >>In fact, you belong in the Crow Note for making that rediculus
    >>prediction a few years back that JJ would be back coaching the college
    >>ranks by the end of 1992. And for all your notes saying the cowboys
    >>would never make the super bowl while JJ was coaching. GIT!! 
    
    I truthfully don't remember making that prediction, and I couldn't find
    anything of the sort in the lasted incarnation of ::SPORTS, but If you
    cain PROVE I made those comments, I'll happily take the trip to the
    crow cafe fer a dose of UNCOOKED crow, with no ketchup OR hot sauce.
                    
    As far as the GIT comment, insert it where the sun don't shine!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
9.257ELMAGO::BENBACAoDoTretteBgnihtynAevaHuoYt'noDWed Feb 03 1993 01:237
     Yea it was interesting to see. Intrestingly enough though right behind
    Lett was another Cowboy who could have blocked bb or at least slowed
    him up a bit but he was looking the wrong way! BB went right on past
    him along the sideline whilst this particular Cowboy stayed gawking
    toward the center of the field.
    
    Ben
9.258ELMAGO::BENBACAoDoTretteBgnihtynAevaHuoYt'noDWed Feb 03 1993 01:3411
    
     This was back in 1989 when they appointed JJ as coach. Maybe it wasn't
    you but I think it was :^)   Anyway, at the time I sort of agreed with
    you seeing as they had just fired TL "the only haid coach the Cowboys have
    ever had" and I didn't know how JJ would be able to turnaround a team
    that was really going down hill at the time. They actually hit bottom
    his first year and I had no real hopes of a SB anytime soon. But look
    what happened.   GIT! :^)    

    I may have seen this reply in the old sports topic "why I hate the
    Cowboys" or something like that. Not sure.
9.259CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowWed Feb 03 1993 11:4918
As a man of some size, I can honestly say that smartest thing Lett could
have done was to have gotten his carcass into the end zone before celebrating.

On the other hand, I can imagine where the immaturity of youth might have
caused that "check out what I just did" shuffle from around the 5.


Hats off to Beebe for NOT quitting -- you know he had to be WAY upfield.


Finally, Lett was moving so slow that even *I* could have caught him,
moving at around 2 MisterPotatoHeads.....


8^)


'Saw
9.260AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSWed Feb 03 1993 12:463
    FWIW, Leon Lett is a rookie and not a veteran.
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
9.261CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowWed Feb 03 1993 12:565
>    FWIW, Leon Lett is a rookie and not a veteran.
    
Yep, and it was definitely a rookie mistake. 8^)


9.262PFSVAX::JACOBM. Jackson=$39 Earl Scheib PaintJobWed Feb 03 1993 13:219
>>Finally, Lett was moving so slow that even *I* could have caught him,
>>moving at around 2 MisterPotatoHeads.....
    
    'Saw, my daid Grandmother could have caught him, but by accounts I've
    gotten of your "speed", you'd never have caught him.
    
    
    JaKe
    
9.263PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 03 1993 13:4127
Subject: Sports Digest
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 93 14:54:42 PST

	Fred Barnett of the Philadelphia Eagles was added to the NFC Pro Bowl
roster as a fifth wide receiver. The addition became necessary when the
AFC could not settle a deadlock between Curtis Duncan and Ernest Givins
of the Houston Oilers for the fourth wide receiver spot. When it was
decided to keep both Duncan and Givins, the NFC squad was allowed to
select another receiver.

----------------------
Subject: Dallas plans welcome home parade after Pro Bowl
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 93 14:33:31 PST

	DALLAS (UPI) -- Hometown fans will have to wait until after the Pro
Bowl to give the world champion Dallas Cowboys a proper welcome home.
	Most of the Cowboys returned late Monday aboard two American Airlines
charter flights, but airport officials closed their arrival to the
public because of security concerns at Dallas-Fort Worth International
Airport.
	City officials, however, plan a ticker-tape parade through downtown
Dallas after Sunday's Pro Bowl game. Several Cowboys stars are going
directly to Hawaii for that game and organizers want them to be part of
the celebration.
	``We'll have confetti all over the place,'' promised Mayor Steve
Bartlett. ``It will look like a blizzard in downtown Dallas.''
    
9.265AXIS::ROBICHAUDVideo Poker - Parimutuel's PanaceaWed Feb 03 1993 14:234
    	Anvilhaid had Lett on his show yesterday.  Seems like a nice
    guy, but I still hate the Cowboys.
    
    				/Don
9.266TORREY::MAY_BRHoof heartedWed Feb 03 1993 15:047
    
    It is celebrations like that which make it so easy to hate the Cowboys. 
    I mean, the bad haircuts, being from Texas, America's team, and JJ are
    reason enough, but hte celebrations are sort of an extra little bonus.
    
    brews, who thought they should have outlawed td dancing when Elmo
    Wright retired.
9.267PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 03 1993 15:102
    I don't think JJ will mind Lett's hotdogging.  Afterall, JJ coached at
    Miami.
9.268Mets in '93METSNY::francusCertified Member-Larry Bird JihadWed Feb 03 1993 15:204
Wasn't it JJ's Miami team that all dressed fatigues and walked out of
a bbq with Penn State before the Fiesta Bowl of 1987 - for the 1986 season??

The Crazy Met
9.270CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowWed Feb 03 1993 18:1610
>     JJ's comment on Lett's faux-pas was, "celebrate AFTER you score
>    not before."


The Amazing thing was how far Beebe had to go to get him, and how short
let had to go to get in.


'Saw

9.271Another guy who's surprised me...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 03 1993 18:3513
    
> Wasn't it JJ's Miami team that all dressed fatigues and walked out of
> a bbq with Penn State before the Fiesta Bowl of 1987 - for the 1986 season??
    
    Yup.  And Michael Irvin was one of the ringleaders.  The funny thing
    about that game with Penn State is that a couple of no-name, diminutive
    DBs named Ray Isom and Duffy Cobbs knocked the crap out of Irvin to the
    point where he developed the alligator arms and started dropping passes
    in the second half.  Now in the NFL and up against the very best he's
    fearless in his routes across the middle...
    
    glenn
    
9.272CAMONE::WAYOk off the expressway, thru the windowThu Feb 04 1993 11:459
In answer to Lee's questions about where Night Train Lane went to school,
he went to

		Western Nebraska C.C.

according to my sources.....


'SAw
9.273SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Fri Feb 05 1993 09:463
    Thanks, 'SAw.
    
    Lee
9.274PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 05 1993 11:231
    The Bills fired their GM.
9.275AXIS::ROBICHAUDVideo Poker - Parimutuel's PanaceaFri Feb 05 1993 15:408
	NAZZ, I thought of you last night while going through this week's 
TSN.  Their guest columnist was Dick Steinberg and he went on and on about 
how you can't just judge a prospect by his showing at the combine because 
that doesn't measure his *football* ability.  He closed out the column by 
saying how the draft is such an inexact science and he hopes circumstances 
will not cause him to pick a *wrong* player with this year's pick (#3).

				/Don
9.278NEXT AFC SUPER CHAMPCOMET::DAVIDSONMon Feb 08 1993 02:378
         The Raiders were the last AFC team to win the Big One, and Imo
    if the Donkeys or Bills represent ( both losers) the AFC, the next team
    to win it will be the last AFC that won it. ( LA RAIDERS)
    
    
      Regards,
    
      MAGNUM
9.276ACESMK::FRANCUSBird retires-good riddanceMon Feb 08 1993 03:3611
    AFC 23 NFC 20 in OT in the Pro Bowl. AFC scored on a blocked field
    goal to take a 20-13 lead, NFC scored with less than a minute to play
    to tie the game at 20. Didn't see anymore so someone else can fill in
    other details.
    
    Pitchers and catchers report in less than 2 weeks and real sports can
    finally begin again.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
    
9.277sufficient? ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeMon Feb 08 1993 11:4711
    
    Yabbut, I'd say that if'n it was tied @ 20 and then the AFC won by
    three,  my guess is (filling in the details as requested) that somebody
    on the AFC kicked a field goal!
    
    They are still worth 3 points. No?
    
    I remain,
    good at 'rithmetic and specualtions.....
    Kev
    
9.279Does anyone really watch the Semi-Pro Bowl?AXIS::ROBICHAUDVideo Poker - Parimutuel's PanaceaMon Feb 08 1993 13:191
    
9.280CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeMon Feb 08 1993 13:242
    not me, I just jumped to conclusions!
    
9.281ok, I'll biteQUASER::JACKSONTAQuit dancin' on that table!Mon Feb 08 1993 13:404
      I watched most of the 2nd half.  Nothing else worth watching was on. 
    It actually wasn't as bad/boring as most pro-blows.
    
      Tim
9.282METSNY::francusBird retires-good riddanceMon Feb 08 1993 13:427
re:.281

Yup, after 10:30 there was nothing else worth watching and the Pro-Bowl
provided the right amount of background noise. That it wasn't a bad game
helped.

The Crazy Met
9.283Way to go BobbyOURGNG::RIGGENWill Note for foodMon Feb 08 1993 22:404
Well Bobby Humphrey was shot in the leg this morning. I sure he was on his way
to the crack dealer to return his bad coke that he didn't use. 

Jeff
9.284CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyTue Feb 09 1993 11:058
    Yea,
    Was shot just above the knee in Alabaster, Alabama. Allegedly he was
    having an argument in his car. Here's a hoot; relatives say that the
    shooting was not serious and would not threaten his career. Jezz, ya
    thionk something else might threaten his career??
    
    MikeL
    
9.285Rich mans asprin will do that!QUASER::JACKSONTAQuit dancin' on that table!Tue Feb 09 1993 13:588
      What a waste!  I was imppressed with is straight forward running, and
    then he held out and got traded and turned into the dolphins #
    reciever, and now the last 2 instances.
    
      Go dry up Bobby,  you can still be a superstar!
    
    
      Tim
9.286Watta loser!TNPUBS::NAZZAROCrusades, Sp. Inquisition, WatergateTue Feb 09 1993 16:278
    Dick Steinberg = my hero!
    
    Cain't wait until the Jests fire him, so he cain go ruin a third team.
    
    The man lies, lies, lies, but he's a good interview - always has time
    for the press.  
    
    NAZZ
9.287CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Feb 09 1993 18:487
    From the "Things I never thought I'd ever say dept.":
    
    The pro-bowl was kinda interesting.
    
    Bye Iron_Mike, O.T. took away your interview, and your team still lost...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.288AXIS::ROBICHAUDVideo Poker - Parimutuel's PanaceaTue Feb 09 1993 18:574
    	Chip, the Semi-Pro Bowl game is on a par with the National Hokey
    League Some Star game...
    
    				/Don
9.289DEC & NFL Help LA YouthPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 12 1993 19:1643
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+TM                                                   ----------- 
|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|                     U.S. News                         LIVE WIRE
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                                                     ----------- 

            Digital joins NFL in Los Angeles youth education project  

  Digital has joined the National Football League (NFL) as a partner in its 
  Youth Education Town project to be built in south central Los Angeles. 
  The youth enrichment project will replace the Watts/Willowbrook Youth 
  Education Training center, which was severely damaged during the 1992 Los
  Angeles riots.  The goal of the NFL project is to provide a "safe haven" where
  the area's at-risk youth can enjoy fun recreation and educational tools. 

  Digital will provide the nonprofit community project with $100,000 in personal
  computers and maintenance.  The Digital personal computers will be used in the
  computer classroom, computer library, education laboratory, administrative 
  computing department, and weight room.  These personal computer systems will 
  be used to develop basic computer skills and allow the students to use them as
  a learning tool.  In addition, the computers will be used in the 
  administrative areas of the center for inventory purposes and database 
  management. 

  In addition to providing personal computers for the center, members of 
  Digital's Los Angeles Community Relations Committee will volunteer at the 
  center as mentors to the students.  This effort by Digital reflects a long 
  history of corporate involvement and service in the many communities around 
  the world and a desire to improve the quality of life in those communities. 

  In the Los Angeles area, Digital continues to work with the community to 
  assist students in many areas, including education.  Digital adopted the Los
  Angeles 95th street preparatory school several years ago and has created a 
  variety of mentor programs focused on scholastic excellence.  The company's 
  efforts with the school have included programs designed not only to help 
  students stay in school, but also to help students excel in school. 

  In the process of selecting Digital as a partner for the NFL Youth Education 
  project, the NFL learned of Digital's personal involvement with the Los 
  Angeles 95th Street preparatory school.  Reggie Williams, director of the NFL
  Education Youth Town Project says, "Together with Digital Equipment 
  Corporation, we are proud to be able to assist in these community programs 
  and encourage other members of the business community to join Digital in 
  selected initiatives through co-participation, collaboration, and replication
  of community programs." 
9.290Old NewsPFSVAX::JACOBBreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F UFri Feb 12 1993 19:181
    
9.291PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 12 1993 19:291
    Not that old, Jake.  It was posted in Livewire on Feb. 9.
9.292QUASER::JACKSONTAQuit dancin' on that table!Fri Feb 12 1993 21:501
      I saw that message over a month ago.
9.293like I said, Old NewsPFSVAX::JACOBBreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F USat Feb 13 1993 01:145
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
9.294Its either "Olds" or its "News"ELMAGO::BENBACAWho, Me?Sat Feb 13 1993 01:213
     Then we should call it  "Olds"    No such thing as Old News :^)
    
    Just like saying Yes no. Either one or the other but not both.
9.295It MUST be Friday, right???PFSVAX::JACOBBreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F USat Feb 13 1993 01:245
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
9.296But not for longELMAGO::BENBACAWho, Me?Sat Feb 13 1993 03:476
    Thank GAWD it's Friday 
    
    
    
    
    Ben       
9.297See note 9.142...PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Sat Feb 13 1993 18:220
9.298it's almost <heart> day! Kiss'rrCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeSun Feb 14 1993 03:341
    
9.299PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 15 1993 13:366
9.300Ah, the hell wif itPFSVAX::JACOBBreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F UMon Feb 15 1993 19:064
    I dunno MAC, .142 looks just shy of IDENTICAL with .289.  
    
    JaKe
    
9.301PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 15 1993 19:163
    OK, I give.  I didn't check .142 until now.  I thought you guys were
    referring to the first Livewire article I posted about DEC giving their
    SuperBowl tickets to LA kids.  Apparently Needle scooped Livewire.
9.302PFSVAX::JACOBBreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F UMon Feb 15 1993 19:218
    Well, hey Mac, I think the only thing you cain do now about the
    sitchy-achion, is set yerself hidden in .289!!!!
    
    
    Many (8^)*'s
    
    JaKe
    
9.303ROYALT::ASHECome on Eileen, ta-loorayah..Fri Mar 05 1993 15:171
    I heard Joe Gibbs has resigned.  (as in quit, not a contract extension)
9.304ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Fri Mar 05 1993 15:325
    
    Radio reports in NY are that he resigned for health related reasons.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.305ROYALT::ASHECome on Eileen, ta-loorayah..Fri Mar 05 1993 15:513
    Figured it was that or he was making too much money owning Dale
    Jarrett's car... I guess Pettibon will take over?
    
9.306CAMONE::WAYAre you ready for the real McCoy?Fri Mar 05 1993 18:488
>    Figured it was that or he was making too much money owning Dale
>    Jarrett's car... I guess Pettibon will take over?

Heard the news conference -- he said itwasn't racing related....


'Saw    

9.307QUASER::JACKSONTAC'mon baby finish what you started!Fri Mar 05 1993 21:314
      Hum,  sounds like he will be back in 2-3 years!?  Maybe he just
    wanted to go to a different team;^)  Wouldn't be suprised!
    
      Tim
9.308of course Tom G. thinks he's scared of JJ's boysCNTROL::CHILDSMike Monroe is as good as dead!!!Mon Mar 08 1993 11:242
He's just pullin' a Parcells....
9.309CAMONE::WAYAre you ready for the real McCoy?Mon Mar 08 1993 11:4423
>He's just pullin' a Parcells....

My cut at it is this.  

The guy is 62.  He was tired at the end of the season, and not feeling 100%.

I never realized how much work it was to be a head coach until I read some
stuff on Lombardi, and some stuff on Parcells.  That kind of stress and
long hours has got to take its toll on you.

Now, I remember the interview with Gibbs just after the 500, and he said
that he enjoyed just watching....


Personally, I think that Gibbs has accomplished everything he wanted
to in the NFL (I mean, three Bowls ain't bad) and now wants to relax,
spend time with the family, and have fun with his new, less stressful,
venture, NASCAR.


JMHO,
'Saw

9.310PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Mar 08 1993 12:395
    I saw an interview of Gibbs from the Pits yesterday.  He said it was
    time to retire and spend time with his family.  He has a son playing
    football and wants to see him play.  He didn't rule out the possibility
    of coming back to coaching, but said he wants to spend a couple of
    years away from it.
9.311correctionUNYEM::JAMESSMon Mar 08 1993 14:025
    re -.2
    
    Gibbs is only 52.
    
                                     Steve J.
9.312Another cheap shot from the grandstand...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Mar 08 1993 14:459
    
    > Gibbs is only 52.
    
    'Saw was giving his age in Saban-years.  Human years + 20%.
    
    Jes' teasin', 'Saw...
    
    glenn
    
9.313CNTROL::CHILDSMARCHMadness aka Fall ofthe UNC EmpireMon Mar 08 1993 15:327
You, really can't expect to come right and say the team is old and on it's
way out. The owner sucks, I don't want to deal with a QB controversy etc..
He 's getting out before he looses any tarnish on that "Gene-yus" tag he
wears.

maybe Gary Clark threaten to kick his ass if he came back....
9.314CAMONE::WAYAre you ready for the real McCoy?Mon Mar 08 1993 15:4212
|    
|    > Gibbs is only 52.
|    
|    'Saw was giving his age in Saban-years.  Human years + 20%.
|    
|    Jes' teasin', 'Saw...
    
Only tellin' ya what I saw in the paper.  Musta been a typo.....


8^)    

9.315LAGUNA::MAY_BRFirst weekend of sunburn seasonMon Mar 08 1993 15:544
    Musta been the paper's fault.  We all know that 'saw wouldn't
    misinterpret something he read in the paper.  8^)
    
    brews
9.316AXIS::ROBICHAUDNotEconomicallyViableMon Mar 08 1993 16:038
    	If Gibbs gets a job at NBC we know it's only a matter of time
    before he's coaching again.  Like MikeH said Gibbs could see the
    decline of the 'Skins.  They're paying tons of money to Rypien and
    a few others meaning the salary cap will deplete this team of most of
    their young talent.  Like Parcells the smart coaches know when to
    get out.
    
    				/Don
9.317CAMONE::WAYAre you ready for the real McCoy?Mon Mar 08 1993 16:5117
>    Musta been the paper's fault.  We all know that 'saw wouldn't
>    misinterpret something he read in the paper.  8^)
    
Gee Brews, the only way I could misinterpret 62 or 52 was if I 

	a) didn't have my glasses on

or
	b) was watching your bodacious neighbor while trying
	   to read the paper



8^) 8^) 8^)


'Saw
9.318Free Agent news from WFANGOMETS::mccarthyMike McCarthy MRO4-3/C19 297-4531Mon Mar 08 1993 17:194
The Jets signed Ronnie Lott today, and are rumored to be on the
verge of signing Leonard Marshall.

Mike
9.319FDCV07::KINGThe Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!Mon Mar 08 1993 17:213
    'Saw is beginning to report like Tank on WBCN....
    
    REK
9.320CAMONE::WAYAre you ready for the real McCoy?Mon Mar 08 1993 17:389
>    'Saw is beginning to report like Tank on WBCN....
    
Hey, I can't help it if my sources are not any good.  8^)

But seriously, my paper had him listed as 62.  There was probably a
correction the day after, but I never read that little 1" of column
space where they post that stuff -- too boring.

What can I say!  8^)
9.321LAGUNA::MAY_BRFirst weekend of sunburn seasonMon Mar 08 1993 20:129
    >The Jets signed Ronnie Lott today, and are rumored to be on theverge of
    >signing Leonard Marshall.
    
Why?  Do they think they are that close to a championship that they can 
    couple of has-beens that can win it for them this year?
    
    brewss
    
                                                                      
9.322AXIS::ROBICHAUDD-FENSTue Mar 09 1993 14:255
    	You got to admit Brews that it would be thighshudderin' to see
    the J-E-S-T-S go over the salary cap by signing a couple of washed
    ups and miss out on some real talent nexted year because of it.
    
    				/Don
9.323PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 09 1993 15:061
    Clarinews is reporting that the Jets did indeed sign Leonard Marshall.
9.324CAMONE::WAYAre you ready for the real McCoy?Tue Mar 09 1993 15:377
>    Clarinews is reporting that the Jets did indeed sign Leonard Marshall.


Yep, they're having a 1pm News Conference today to announce it....


'Saw
9.325Great news! It's a two Bounty announcement!AXIS::ROBICHAUDD-FENSTue Mar 09 1993 15:581
    
9.326CAMONE::WAYAre you ready for the real McCoy?Tue Mar 09 1993 16:076
>               -< Great news!  It's a two Bounty announcement! >-


Bounty!  The Quicker Picker Upper.....
    

9.327ROYALT::ASHEArsenio spotted with golf pants...Mon Mar 22 1993 21:255
    Pats signed Scott Secules..
    Phoenix signed Gary Clark...
    Bears signed Jim Harbaugh
    Phoenix gets da Supa Bowl in '96...
    
9.328Super Bowl XXXFRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyTue Mar 23 1993 00:523
>    Phoenix gets da Supa Bowl in '96...
    
    The triple X!
9.329hmm...ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Tue Mar 23 1993 04:015
    ESPN reported that Reggie White would announce on Thursday that he
    was signing with the Jets. Both the Jets and White denied the report.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.330ROYALT::ASHEArsenio spotted with golf pants...Tue Mar 23 1993 12:282
    Is the climate in Phoenix ready to accept anything rated XXX?
    
9.331AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingTue Mar 23 1993 14:035
    	Edlestein said on ESPN lasted night that the 49ers were letting
    Holt go to Atlanta and are going to make a bid on White.  Reggie
    will never see a Super Bowl if he signs with the Jesters.
    
    				/Don
9.332PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 23 1993 14:065
9.333AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingTue Mar 23 1993 14:2010
    	Will McDonough seems to think Millen will be traded and Secules
    will be used as cannon fodder until either Bledsoe or Mirer can
    play or the Pats get an offensive line (whichever comes first).
    Pats are getting a bunch of PlanB has beens and want to deal Fryar.
    If I were Parcells I would try to sell Irving on staying because
    he's the kind of guy a young team needs.  All he cares about is
    winning, all the other stuff is secondary to him.  If Millen goes
    it would be the death knell for the cheerleaders.  8^(
    
    				/Don
9.334CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyTue Mar 23 1993 15:457
    Po' Slash,
    No Mrs. Millen to gawk at. 8^). As was stated, mebbe the Pats will need
    5 QB's if the "O" line continues to play like Mike "The Matador"
    Hawkins.
    
    MikeL
    
9.335AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingTue Mar 23 1993 15:506
    	Pats are cheap MikeL, they'll never pay five QBs unless three
    are making minimum wage.  The irony is that excluding a potential
    quarterback draftee, Millen is still the best of the bunch.  Maybe
    Parcells is intimidated by his intelligence.  
    
    				/Don
9.336we'll see how bad Bidwill wants to winFRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyTue Mar 23 1993 18:323
    Cards need to re-sign Tim McDonald or the Clark signing won't bring
    them much.  Rumor has it that Phoenix and San Francisco have offers on
    the table to Tim.
9.337CSC32::M_MACGREGORWed Mar 24 1993 12:489
    
    The Patriots have a master plan.  The reason for so many quarterbacks
    is they are planning to trade straight up two quarterbacks for a
    halfback or perhaps four quarterbacks for a full back.
    
    HTH
    
    Marc
    
9.338CNTROL::CHILDSdarn, better cancel my bikini waxThu Mar 25 1993 13:507
You're joking right Slasher? Fryar only cares about winning? Why the heck
can't he catch consistantly then? Fryar cares about Fryar period! Always
has, always will....

mike    

9.340METSNY::francusMets in '93Thu Mar 25 1993 14:025
>> Look no further than his dropped pass in the Orange Bowl

What/when was that play??

The Crazy Met
9.341PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 25 1993 14:431
    I hear Jim McMahon was signed by the Vikings.
9.342KALI::MORGANThu Mar 25 1993 16:057
    Re: .339
    
    Fryar dropped a perfectly thrown touchdown pass in the 82? Orange Bowl
    that would have given an awesome Nebraska team the national
    championship.
    
    					Steve
9.343more for your moneyCSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketThu Mar 25 1993 16:4710
>>                    <<< Note 9.337 by CSC32::M_MACGREGOR >>>
>>
>>    
>>    The Patriots have a master plan.  The reason for so many quarterbacks
>>    is they are planning to trade straight up two quarterbacks for a
>>    halfback or perhaps four quarterbacks for a full back.
    
If it wuz me, I would trade one quarterback for five nickel backs!

Jerry
9.344ROYALT::ASHENot that there's anything wrong w/ thatThu Mar 25 1993 17:133
    I heard Jim McMahon is a Viking... Green hopes to get 11 games out
    of him...
    
9.345CAMONE::WAYShore,Brimsek,Orr,BourqueThu Mar 25 1993 17:306
>    I heard Jim McMahon is a Viking... Green hopes to get 11 games out
>    of him...

Did anyone tell Hawk?
    

9.346AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingFri Mar 26 1993 14:358
    	Fryar gets a bad rap in this town.  His only problem the last
    few years is that the other Patriot wide receivers would have a
    hard time making a TopTen college team.  Anybody see the new Pats
    logo?  It sips!  Looks like the "Old Man In the Mountain" on LSD.
    Makes the old logo with the guy squattin' over the football look
    good.  8^(
    
    				/Don
9.347Yeah, it's RoboPatsyCTHQ::LEARYWACO: WeAin'tComin'OutFri Mar 26 1993 14:491
    
9.348AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingFri Mar 26 1993 14:594
    	Yeah what a sissy logo.  So much for the Parcells image of mainly
    football.  8^(
    
    				/Don
9.349CAMONE::WAYShane, The Wonder DogFri Mar 26 1993 15:027
>    	Yeah what a sissy logo.  So much for the Parcells image of mainly
>    football.  8^(
    
Another GREAT logo bites the dust.


'Saw
9.350CNTROL::CHILDSdarn, better cancel my bikini waxFri Mar 26 1993 15:334
Yeah Slash and Fryar never did anything to deserve that "bum rap"???

;^)
9.351LAGUNA::MAY_BRInside IntelFri Mar 26 1993 18:231
    McMahon was traded!!!
9.352True?ELMAGO::BENBACALike a Fresh of Breath air!Sat Mar 27 1993 01:071
     To who? For what? Why? When? How? Where?
9.353SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Mon Mar 29 1993 10:518
    You got it right, MikeC.  Fryar went out and earned any bum rap he
    carries.  He had the physical tools; speed, great moves, good hands. 
    Unfortunately, to me, he lacked the one essential thing that is need in
    all sports: concentration.  He'd work at getting open, then turn on a
    burst of speed, only to DROP the damn ball.  Far too many of those type
    of plays in his early years.  
    
    lEe
9.354No discussion about Reggie being a PackerOURGNG::RIGGENWill Note for foodWed Apr 07 1993 18:562
Reggie "minister of DEFense" White is now a very rich Green bay Packer. 

9.355AXIS::ROBICHAUDComeToMiami-AndGiveUsYourMoney!Wed Apr 07 1993 21:044
    	I'm glad God told Reggie what I would have.  Money talks and
    BS walks.
    
    				/Don
9.356Super Joe makes another visitFRETZ::HEISERSpam &amp; Eggs, Spam, SpamFri Apr 16 1993 02:359
    "If Joe Montana comes here, him and Sir Charles are gonna rule
    Phoenix." - Cardinal receiver Gary Clark
    
    Joe paid another surprise visit this afternoon and worked out with the
    Cards.  People around here are getting excited since Phoenix is
    definitely in Joe's top 2 (Kansas City the other).  I might even have
    to start a Cards topic ;-)
    
    MoS(C)
9.357PFSVAX::JACOBGO PENS!!!!!!Fri Apr 16 1993 03:017
    Joe M. is a has been, and anybody who signs him fer any sizable amount
    of cash is going to be pumping good money down the ol toilet.
    
    Ya heerd it here first
    
    JaKe
    
9.358QUASER::JACKSONTAIf you see KayFri Apr 16 1993 14:0412
      Yes and no.  I take it the Cards are scrapping Timm Rosenbah (sp?)?  
    He is injury prone.  Chris Chandler is a back-up.
    
      Look at KC,  they've been looking for a good QB since Len Dawson;^)
    
      Minny, TB, Pats, Seattle, faids, & jets are other teams that need a
    QB, and Joe appearently can still throw.
    
      I agree that the $$$$ may be steep.
    
    
      Tim
9.359A community service message!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Fri Apr 16 1993 14:51320
    PLAYERS SIGNED OR LOST DUE TO FREE AGENCY - AND LIST OF TRADES (As of
    4/14):
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
                        space = unrestricted free agent
                        r = restricted free agent
                        x = resigned with old team
                        m = matched
                        t = transitional player
                        T = trade
                        L = player lost due to FA
    
    ATLANTA FALCONS
    ---------------
    x- Mike Gann, dl, Atlanta
    t- Pierce Holt, de, San Francisco
       James Geathers, dl, Washington
       Melvin Jenkins, cb, Detroit
    T- DB Vince Clark from Green Bay for 4th round pick in 1993.
    T- S Alton Montgomery from Denver for 1993 3rd & 7th round picks
    
    L- Houston Hoover, ol (Cleveland)
    L- Bill Fralic, ot (Detroit)
    L- John Washington, de (New England)
    L- Wade Wilson, qb (New Orleans)
    
    BUFFALO BILLS
    -------------
    x- Adam Lingner, c, Buffalo
    m- Jeff Wright, dt, Buffalo (San Francisco)
    r- Glen Parker, og, Buffalo
       Billy Brooks, wr, Indianapolis
    
    L- Will Woolford, ot (Indianapolis)
    L- Shane Conlan, lb (LA Rams)
    L- Carlton Bailey, lb (NY Giants)
    
    CHICAGO BEARS
    -------------
    r- Joe Cain, lb, Seattle
    x- Jim Harbough, qb, Chicago
    x- Trace Armstrong, de, Chicago
    x- Steve McMichael, dt, Chicago
    x- Glen Kozlowski, wr, Chicago
       Craig Heyward, fb, New Orleans
    
    L- James Thornton, te (NY Jets)
    
    CINCINNATI BENGALS
    -------------------
       Sheldon White, db, Detroit
    T- 1993 3rd round pick from NY Jets for QB Boomer Esiason
    
    L- Rodney Holman, te (Detroit)
    L- Eric Thomas, cb (NY Jets)
    L- Tim McGee, wr (Washington)
    
    CLEVELAND BROWNS
    ----------------
       Houston Hoover, og, Atlanta
       Reggie Rutland, cb, Minnesota
       Vinny Testaverde, qb, Tampa Bay
       Mark Carrier, wr, Tampa Bay
    
    L- Mark Bavaro, te (Philadelphia)
    L- Mike Tomczak, qb (Pittsburgh)
    
    DALLAS COWBOYS
    --------------
    x- Charles Haley, de, Dallas
    
    L- Kelvin Martin, wr (Seattle)
    
    DENVER BRONCOS
    --------------
       Rod Bernstine, rb, San Diego
       Don Maggs, ot, Houston
       Brian Habib, og, Minnesota
       Robert Delpino, rb, LA Rams
    T- 1993 3rd & 7th round picks from Atlanta for S Alton Montgomery
    T- 1993 3rd round pick from LA Raiders for RB Gaston Green
    
    L- Mark Jackson, wr (NY Giants)
    
    DETROIT LIONS
    -------------
    x- William White, db, Detroit
       Rodney Holman, te, Cincinnati
       David Lutz, og, Kansas City
       Bill Fralic, ot, Atlanta
       Dave Richards, ol, San Diego
    
    L- Melvin Jenkins, cb (Atlanta)
    L- Sheldon White, db (Cincinnati)
    
    GREEN BAY PACKERS
    -----------------
    x- Roland Mitchell, db, Green Bay
    x- James Campen, c, Green Bay
       Reggie White, de, Philadelphia
       Bill Maas, nt, Kansas City
       Harry Galbreath, og, Miami
       Tunch Ilkin, ol, Pittsburgh
       Ervin Randle, lb, Kansas City
       Robert Wilson, fb, Tampa Bay
       Jesse Anderson, te, Tampa Bay
    T- 1993 4th round pick from Atlanta for DB Vince Clark
    T- RB John Stephens from New Engand for 1993 4th round pick
    T- QB Ken O'Brien from NY Jets for 1993 5th round pick
    
    L- Chuck Cecil, s (Phoenix)
    L- Don Majkowski, qb
    
    HOUSTON OILERS
    -------------
    x- Eugene Seale, lb, Houston
    x- Cody Carlson qb, Houston
    
    L- Don Maggs, ot (Denver)
    
    INDIANAPOLIS COLTS
    ------------------
    x- Jessie Hester, wr, Indianapolis
    x- Clarence Verdin, wr, Indianapolis
       Kirk Lowdermilk, c, Minnesota
    t- Will Wolford, ot, Buffalo
    
    L- Billy Brooks, wr (Buffalo)
    
    KANSAS CITY CHIEFS
    ------------------
    r- David Szott, og, Kansas City
    r- JJ Birden, wr, Kansas City
    r- eonard Griffin, de, Kansas City
    
    L- Bill Maas, dt (Geen Bay)
    L- David Lutz, og (Detroit)
    L- Ervin Randle lb (Green Bay)
    
    LOS ANGELES RAIDERS
    -------------------
    x- Vince Evans, qb, LA Raiders
    x- Jeff Gossett, p, LA Raiders
       Jeff Hostetler, qb, NY Giants
       Gerald Perry, ot, LA Rams
    T- RB Gaston Green from Denver for 1993 3rd rond pick
    
    L- Ronnie Lott, s (NY Jets)
    
    LOS ANGELES RAMS
    ----------------
    x- Gerald Robinson, dl, LA Rams
       Irv Eatman, ot, NY Jets
       Fred Stokes, de, Washington
       Shane Conlan, lb, Buffalo
       Henry Rolling, lb, San Dieg
    
    L- Robert Delpino, rb (Denver)
    L- Gerald Perry, ot(LA Rams)
    L- Kevin Greene, lb (Pittsburgh)
    L- Joe Millinichik, og (Seattle)
    
    MIAMI DOLPHINS
    --------------
       Mark Ingram, wr, NY Giants
    T- WR Irving Fryar from New England for 1993 2nd & 1994 3rd round pick
    
    L- Mark Clayton, wr
    L- Harry Galbreath, og (Green Bay)
    L- Scott Secules, qb (New England)
    L- Ferrell Edmunds, te (Seattle)
    
    MINNESOTA VIKINGS
    -----------------
    x- Sean Salisbury, qb, Minnesota
       Jim McMahon, qb, Philadelphia
    
    L- Al Noga, de
    L- Kirk Lowdermik, c (Indianapolis)
    L- Reggie Rutland, cb (Cleveland
    L- Brian Habib, ot (Denver)
    
    NEW ENGLAND PATROITS
    -------------------
       John Washington, de, Atlanta
       Steve Trapilo, ol, New Orleans
       Leon Seals, de, Philadelphia
       Aaron Jones, de, Pittsburgh
       Scott Secules, qb, Miami
    T- 1993 4th round pick from Green Bay for RB John Stephens
    T- 1993 2nd & 1994 3rd round pick from Miami for WR Irving Fyar
    
    L- No one as of 4/14
    
    NEW ORLEANS SAINTS
    ------------------
    x- Les Miller, nt, New Orleans
       Wade Wilson, qb, Atlanta
    
    L- Bobby Hebert, qb
    L- Crig Heyward, fb (Chicago)
    L- Steve Trapilo, ol (New Egland)
    
    NEW YORK GIANTS
    ---------------
    x- Phil Simms, qb, NY Giants
    x- Sean Landeta, p, NY Giants
    x- Lawrence Taylor, lb, NY Giants
       Carlton Bailey, lb, Buffalo
       Mark Jackson, wr, Denver
       Mike Sherrard, wr, San Francisco
    
    L- Jeff Hostetler, qb (LA Raiders)
    L- Mark Ingram, wr (Miami)
    L- Leonard Marshall, dl (NY Jets)
    
    NEW YORK JETS
    -------------
    x- Chris Burkett, wr, NY Jets
    x- Scott Mersereau, dl, NY Jets
    x- Paul Frase, dl, NY Jets
       Ronnie Lott, s, LA Raiders
       Leonard Marshall,dl, NY Giants
       Eric Thomas, db, Cincinnati
       Jame Thornton, te, Chicago
    T- QB Boomer Esiason from Cincinnati for 1993 3rd round pick
    T- 1993 5th round pck from Green Bay for QB Ken O'Brien
    
    L- Irv Eatman, ot (LA Rams)
    
    PHILADELPHIA EAGLES
    -------------------
       Mark Bavaro, te, Cleveland
    
    L- Reggie White, de (Green Bay)
    L- Jim McMahon, qb (Minnesota)
    L- Leon Seals, de (New England)
    L- John Booty, db (Phoenix)
    L- David Archer, qb (CFL)
    
    PHOENIX CARDINALS
    -----------------
    x- Tyrone Stowe, lb, Phoenix
       John Booty, db, Philadelphia
       Gary Clark, wr, Washington
       Chuck Cecl, s, Green Bay
    T- 1993 undisclosed draft pick from ansas City for DB Jay Taylor
    
    L- Tim McDonald, s (San Francisco)
    
    PITTSBURGH STEELERS
    -------------------
       Greg Clark, lb, Seattle
       Kevin Greene, lb, LA Rams
       Mike Tomczak, qb, Cleveland
    m- Neil O'Donnell, qb, Pittsburgh (Tampa Bay)
    
    L- Tunch Ilkin, ot (Green Bay)
    L- Hardy Nickerson, lb (Tampa Bay)
    L- Aaron Jones, de (New England)
    
    SAN DIEGO CHARGERS
    ------------------
       Joe Millinichik, og, LA Rams
       Brian Davis, b, Seattle
    r- Jerrol Williams, lb, Pittsburgh
    
    L- Ro Bernstine, rb (Denver)
    L- David Richards, ol (Detrot)
    L- Henry Rolling, lb (LA Rams)
    
    SAN FRANCISCO 49ers
    -------------------
    x- Bill Romanowski, lb, San Francisco
    x- Steve Bono, qb, San Francisco
       Tim McDonald, s, Phoenix
    
    L- Pierce Holt, dl (Atlanta)
    L- Mike Sherrard, wr (NY Giants)
    
    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
    ----------------
       Ferrell Edmunds, te, Miami
       Kelvin Martin, wr, Dallas
    x- Trey Junkin, te, Seattle
    
    L- Joe Cain, lb (Chicago)
    L- Greg Clark, lb (Pittsburgh)
    L- rian Davis, db (SaBn Diego)
    
    TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS
    --------------------
       Hardy Nickerson, lb, Pittsburgh   Martin Mayhew, cb, Washington
    m- Tony Mayberry, c, Tampa Bay (New England)
    
    L- Vinny Testaverde, qb (Cleveland)
    L- Mark Carrier, wr (Cleveland)
    L- Robert Wilson, fb (Green Bay)
    L- Jesse Anderson, te (Green Bay)
    
    WASHINGTON REDSKINS
    -------------------
    x- Brad Edwards, db, Washington
    x- Kurt Gouveia, lb, Washington
    x- Danny Copeland, db, Washington
    x- Tim Johnson, dt, Washington
       Tim McGee, wr, Cincinnati
    
    L- Gary Clark, wr (Phoenix)
    L- Martin Mayhew, cb (Tampa Bay)
    L- James Geathers, dl (Atlanta)
    L- Fred Stokes, de (LA Rams)
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    		       	          THE END
    
    Carlitos
    
9.360METSNY::francusABPFri Apr 16 1993 17:006
re: .358

Jets just got Esiason who will cost them 2.3 million so I doubt
they would have any interest in Montana.

The Crazy Met
9.361PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Apr 16 1993 19:286
9.362QUASER::JACKSONTAIf you see KayFri Apr 16 1993 21:471
      Good point Mac
9.363FRETZ::HEISERSpam &amp; Eggs, Spam, SpamSat Apr 17 1993 00:1511
    Super Joe may not be washed up.  In his workout here yesterday, he
    overthrew Randall "Thrill" Hill on a bomb pattern.  Hill is one of the
    fastest receivers around the league.
    
    The Cards have offered their 20th pick of the 1st round (they have
    another earlier).  S.F. seems to be agreeable with that, especially
    when K.C. is trying to get him for nothing.
    
    Timm Rosenbach, besides being injury-prone, hasn't decided if he wants 
    to continue playing football for a living.  Phoenix also has Tony Sacca
    (Penn St.) has their current #3 QB.
9.364PFSVAX::JACOBPens Go Fer 3 in '93!!Sat Apr 17 1993 01:3321
    
    >>      <<< Note 9.363 by FRETZ::HEISER "Spam & Eggs, Spam, Spam" >>>

    >>Super Joe may not be washed up.  In his workout here yesterday, he
    >>overthrew Randall "Thrill" Hill on a bomb pattern.  Hill is one of the
    >>fastest receivers around the league.
    
    OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoohhhhhhhh, Super Joe cain "overthrow" a receiver. 
    Guess whoever he plays fer goes to the Bowl and Disneyworld nexted
    year, huh???
    
    
    C'mon, Brister has overthrown Lipps and Stallworth and many others in
    his career and he ain't doin crap now.  Probably be out of a job come
    summer.
    
    Overthrowing is just missed timing, nothing more nothing less.  If ya
    ain't got decent timing, ya ain't goin' no freakin' place.
    
    JaKe
    
9.365Super Joe wif da Cards huh?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Sat Apr 17 1993 13:285
    Well Jakey, I think we all know that Joe's got timing...the thing about
    Joe that was questionable was how good that arm is...and overthrowing
    speedy receivers is a good thing. HtH
    
    Carlitos 
9.366it's in Debartolo's court nowFRETZ::HEISERSpam &amp; Eggs, Spam, SpamSat Apr 17 1993 17:219
    Agreed Carlos.  Timing improves the more he plays.  The strength of his
    arm was the question mark.  Although, his career could be over the next
    time he gets hit.
    
    It's pretty much over now though.  He's picked K.C., being a contender,
    and working with his old coaches helped.  They also upgraded their
    offer from a 3rd round to their 18th pick.  
    
    Mike
9.367ACESMK::FRANCUSABPSun Apr 18 1993 01:416
    And SF wants "other considerations" whatever the heck that means. So
    far
    no deal.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.368GENRAL::WADEyippy-I-yo-mama!Mon Apr 19 1993 13:199
    
    	I think SF is crazy if they let Joe go.  I didn't see ole Steve
    	Young take 'em to the promised land last year.  Young is good
    	but it seems, to me anyway, that he gets flustered if it's a
    	tight game.  
    
    	Joe's a winner.........
    
    Claybroon
9.369Phoenix is back on the tableFRETZ::HEISERSpam &amp; Eggs, Spam, SpamMon Apr 19 1993 16:354
    Now Debartolo is saying if he goes anywhere, he's going to Phoenix. 
    Should be interesting how this pans out...
    
    Mike
9.370Oh where O where does little Joe go ?OURGNG::RIGGENWill Note for foodMon Apr 19 1993 22:034
DeBartelo has matched the KC offer sheet and named Montana the starting QB.
What is the deal today I heard he is going to make a decision today ?

Jeff
9.371ACESMK::FRANCUSABPTue Apr 20 1993 04:177
    Montana decided to go to KC. KC now needs to make an acceptable offer
    to SF. SF is now saying that because of the "special relationship" with
    Montana they will try to accede to his wishes; but they need to do what
    is best for SF in terms of making a deal.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.372ROYALT::ASHEWill u b there when I feed the tree...Tue Apr 20 1993 13:287
    McDonough was on EeeeeeeeeeEeeeeeeeeeIiiiiiiiii thised morning.
    
    Guess SF wants to trade him to Phoenix for the #20 pick.
    
    They then want to package the #20, their 1st number pick, a 2nd and
    a 3rd to NE for NE's number 1.  Could be interesting...
    
9.373QUASER::JACKSONTAIf you see KayTue Apr 20 1993 14:481
      This saga is getting as ridiculous as the Reggie ordeal.
9.374METSNY::francusABPTue Apr 20 1993 14:486
Would NE go for a deal like that?? by the time they get to pick the
top QB, RB, LB, DE will be gone. Now with free agency these kind of deals
will probably become less and less common.

The Crazy Met
9.375ROYALT::ASHEWill u b there when I feed the tree...Tue Apr 20 1993 18:297
    They need more than a single player... they need depth...
    
    Dale Arnold was blasting Montana for being selfish about this.  Wanting
    to pick a team and not looking out for the best interest of the 49ers.
    Gee, if I were getting traded, I wouldn't exactly be concerned about
    that.  Was he saying the same thing when Irving headed to Miami?
    
9.376Didn't he give Irving's move an SO?CNTROL::CHILDSU think u're something special? Think Again!Tue Apr 20 1993 18:330
9.377Montana's act has become boring; move him out...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Apr 20 1993 18:4816
    
    > Dale Arnold was blasting Montana for being selfish about this.  Wanting
    > to pick a team and not looking out for the best interest of the 49ers.
    > Gee, if I were getting traded, I wouldn't exactly be concerned about
    > that.  Was he saying the same thing when Irving headed to Miami?
    
    Sure, but Irving Fryar wasn't saying that $3M/year, the starter's
    job and godlike status within the community was "too little too late",
    coming off two years of inactivity where your replacement just won
    the MVP award.  Basically, Kansas City's putting up bigger bucks so 
    Joe's throwing up a smokescreen about his treatment.  I think Joe's act
    with regard to Steve Young all along has been worthy of the Wade Boggs
    Team Play Award.  Amazing what kind of forgiveness winning will bring...   
    
    glenn
    
9.379PFSVAX::JACOBTwas a HUGE Texas BarbecueWed Apr 21 1993 03:134
    Joe Montana was traded to the KC Chiefs tonite.
    
    JaKe
    
9.380USA Today - Tuesday on Montana-49ersAKOCOA::BREENIn the land of the blind the one-eyed reignWed Apr 21 1993 13:4715
    USA Today had an article basically stating that Joe saved 49ers
    embarassment by taking KC job.  Essentially, 49ers were having PR
    problems in their shabby treatment of Joe but Joe behaved with class by
    solving the dilemma and saving face for De B etal.
    
    I essentially agreed with the article.
    
    My opine is that athletes should be able to compete fairly for a job. 
    I cannot fathom the EEI position on this (along with many, many
    others).  If players must have some restrictions on free movement for
    the good of a sport then owners have an ethical responsibility to the
    individual players to not hinder the players career as major league
    baseball did for so many years.
    
    Bill
9.381AXIS::ROBICHAUDComeToMiami-AndGiveUsYourMoney!Wed Apr 21 1993 16:316
    	Pats need an impact player on either side of the ball.  They
    should go get one now.  Trading down will only be more evidence
    that they're fixing up the balance sheet to either sell or move
    the team.
    
    				/Don
9.382QUASER::JACKSONTAIf you see KayWed Apr 21 1993 21:2415
      So do you think Steve Young will be happy with 9'rs?   He was
    back-up, then starter, then back-up as of last sunday, and now he is
    the starter again.  That was 1 class act of
    ownership/managment/coaching that happened out in Frisco this past week.   
    
      Montana will help the Chiefs,  but not to the extent of what he did
    in 49'r land.  He will not have the offensive line that he did,  and
    one more somewhat of a major injury will do him in,  and the chiefs
    aren't the best pass blockers around,  and I think they lost 1-2
    starting OL to FA.
    
      Montana will probably be a thorn in Denvers side depending on Denvers
    DL.
    
      Tim
9.383FRETZ::HEISERbreak this ball and chainMon Apr 26 1993 17:127
    The Cards were rated to have had an uncharacteristically good draft
    day.  I think getting rid of that headcase JJ was a plus.  He only
    plays when he feels like it.
    
    On the other hand, signing Beurlein for megabucks when they could've
    had him for a song (2nd round pick) last summer just leaves you shaking 
    your head.
9.384SOLANA::MAY_BRInside Intel, but no Intel insideTue Apr 27 1993 18:3218
    
    I also think dealing JJ for the pick was a good idea.  If Hearst is the
    franchise player everyone seems to think he is, JJ would have no PT
    anyway, and would be gone at the end of the year (he'll be a FA).  They
    also made to very good pickups on the OL, that should help them down
    the line.
    
    Waiting for Beurlein is OK.  They got him for nothing but $.  Had they
    made the deal last year, they would have lost a draft pick AND he still
    would have been a FA this year.
    
    If they only had kept MacDonald, I'd be very excited.  I think they'll
    make  a couple more FA moves for DB's.  RB is probably the biggest
    impact position for a rookie to come in and do well, and it seems that
    the Cards may have gotten one of the top RB's out of college in the
    last 5-6 years.  Hopefully he can help turn things around.
    
    brews 
9.385Brews is seeing RedFRETZ::HEISERthe sun was setting in AvalonTue Apr 27 1993 19:549
    Brews, thanks for the info.  You obviously were aware of some things I
    wasn't.  You must be excited since you're a fan, are you going to start
    a Cards topic?  
    
    If they only kept McDonald, we'd be looking at some exciting potential. 
    Just when I thought they should sell Colangelo the team, they go and
    pull some decent moves.
    
    Mike
9.386SOLANA::MAY_BRInside Intel, but no Intel insideTue Apr 27 1993 20:2713
    
    A Cards fan, hmmmm, not sure.  Especially since they beat the Sox in
    '67.  OH, those Cards.  Actually, I'm pleased to see them make some
    smart moves, starting by getting rid of George Boone, who was head of
    personel.  Ackels seems to be making some good moves so far (except for
    MacDonald).
    
    I'll still be a Giants fan first, though.  I still cheered for them
    over the niners, who won 3 sb's in the 7 years I lived there, so I
    don't see that changing.  I like to see the local team do well, as it
    makes going to the games more fun.  
    
    brews
9.387ok Doc, er BrewsFRETZ::HEISERthe sun was setting in AvalonTue Apr 27 1993 21:230
9.388SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindFri Apr 30 1993 10:5910
    I guess the NFL will soon announce that New Hampshire will not be
    eligible for any future Super Bowls, as it's legislature rejected a
    bill which would have changed the name of the state's Civil Rights Day
    to MLK Day.
    
    No such announcement is expected from ML Baseball, nor the NBA or NHL,
    but don't plan on seeing any of these leagues put their championship
    games in the Granite State in the near future, either.
    
    Lee
9.389MKFSA::LONGIf you get there before I doFri Apr 30 1993 13:234
	Ah, there goes our chances for an NFL team!


	billl
9.390SALEM::DODASniff, fish for dinner last night?Fri Apr 30 1993 13:493
Any word on when professional fottball will be coming to Mass?

daryll
9.391SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindMon May 03 1993 10:554
    Daryll, is fottball anything like football?  Sounds like a German sport
    to me.
    
    Lee
9.392SALEM::DODASniff, fish for dinner last night?Tue May 04 1993 18:037
Lee,

My mistake, what I really meant to say is "You're a weenie".

Hope this clears this up for ewe.

daryll
9.393SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindThu May 06 1993 11:053
    Hey Daryll, what do you do with a weenie?  :*)
    
    Lee
9.394strange situationFRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyFri May 07 1993 20:525
    Timm Rosenbach failed to show for mini-camp and hasn't been heard from
    since the end of last season.  The Cards may announce he has retired.
    
    He changed his unlisted number, hasn't returned letters from the team,
    and his agent doesn't seem to know much either.  
9.395DECWET::METZGERImagine your logo here.Fri May 07 1993 20:545
What was his injury last year? Did he hurt a hip or something?


Metz
9.396Cards may make some noise with their solid draftFRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyFri May 07 1993 20:599
    No, he separated his shoulder and missed 4 games.  Chris Chandler did
    so well, Timm couldn't win his starting job back.  Now they signed
    Beurlein and still have Tony Sacca (Penn St.) on the bench.  They don't
    really need Timm anymore.
    
    Interestingly enough, both Chandler and Beurlein have stated they will
    be the #1 QB in the fall.  Should provide an interesting training camp.
    
    Mike
9.397SOLANA::MAY_BRInside Intel, but no Intel insideMon May 10 1993 15:486
    
    Timm got hit in the head and lost his cajones.  He announced his
    retirement, giving up 2 yrs of guaranteed salary ($2mil, but whose
    counting?).
    
    brews
9.398Eagles scheduleAIMHI::CORRIGANMon Jun 07 1993 16:046
    
    Is there a note for the 1993-94 NFL schedule? Specifically the Eagles.
    
    Thanks
    
    Joe
9.399RUGBY1::wayThe sloop is pointing northMon Jun 07 1993 16:375
No.  Usually, when someone finds it, they post it in this topic, so this
is the one to watch.


'Saw
9.400AIMHI::CORRIGANMon Jun 07 1993 16:402
    
    Thanx
9.401PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jun 07 1993 16:431
    You can also check the AMERICAN_FOOTBALL conference.
9.402crazy place to look!!AIMHI::CORRIGANMon Jun 07 1993 17:138
    
    re. -1
    
    Found it. Perfect.
    
    Thanx
    
    Joe
9.403Banks signs with Redskins....CAMONE::WAYYe can nae dispute tha'Tue Jun 15 1993 13:3569
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.virginia+dc,clari.local.new_jersey,clari.sports.top
Subject: Banks signs with Redskins
Keywords: football, men's professional
Message-ID: <fbn-banksU3uE825pe@clarinet.com>
References: <fbn-banksU3uE515pe@clarinet.com>
X-Supersedes: <fbn-banksU3uE515pe@clarinet.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 93 17:32:09 PDT
Location: district of columbia, virginia, new jersey
ACategory: sports
Slugword: fbn-banks
Priority: major
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 534/545; Id: z6264; Sel: xxsfp; Adate: 6-14-825ped; Ver: 0/1; V: sked
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
Codes: ysfprxx., &sfprdc., &sfprva., &sfprnj.
Lines: 51
 
	ASHBURN, Va. (UPI) -- The Washington Redskins, delivering a blow to
their NFC East rival New York Giants, have signed free agent outside
linebacker Carl Banks, Redskins General Manager Charley Casserly
announced Monday.
	``In Carl Banks, we think we have acquired one of the premier outside
linebackers in the National Football League,'' Casserly said. ``Carl has
always presented us problems since he joined the Giants, and we're glad
to have him on our side with the Redskins.''
	Giants Coach Dan Reeves admitted that if he had to watch Banks leave
the division if he had to leave the Giants after nine years, he would
have rather seen him leave the division.
	``Selfishly, I would have liked to have seen him explore 27 other
teams and not leave the New York Giants,'' Reeves said. ``Realistically,
with talent like that, there was a chance someone would make an offer
like that. I'm happy for Carl and sad that he won't finish his career
with the New York Giants.''
	Casserly has to be relieved that he has some insurance in the event
Wilbur Marshall leaves the Redskins. Disgruntled from the start at the
new free agency system, Marshall objected to being Washington's
franchise player which keeps him from becoming an unrestricted free
agent. The Redskins tried to deal him to Houston but the Oilers' balked
at Washington's demands. Should a trade still go through, Banks provides
a replacement.
	Banks, 31, had been named as a transition player by the Giants,
reserving their right to match any offer he received but the club
recently dropped that designation and signed inside linebacker Michael
Brooks from the Denver Broncos. Banks became an unrestricted free agent
as a result of the Giants' move.
	Reeves said the addition of Brooks did not make Banks expendable.
	``I don't think you take a Pro Bowl inside linebacker and put him
outside, especially having had Michael earlier in his career and putting
him inside,'' said the former Denver coach who moved Brooks as a Bronco
from the outside.
	``We had to make the decision if we were going to keep Carl as a
transition player,'' Reeves put the decision in terms of dollars. ``Now
we've got to find somebody who's going to replace Carl Banks.''
	Corey Miller and Kanavis McGhee are the likely candidates among the
returning Giants but Reeves said he won't look for an answer until
training camp. The Giants currently are holding a mini-camp. Reeves did
not rule out another inside linebacker moving outside.
	New York also had signed free agent Carlton Bailey, who was an inside
linebacker with Buffalo. Giants star outside linebacker Lawrence Taylor
recently re-signed with the club.
	Banks, 6-foot-4 and 235 pounds, was selected by the Giants with the
third overall pick of the 1984 draft out of Michigan State. He played on
two Super Bowl championship teams in New York and earned a Pro Bowl
berth following the 1987 season. In 1987, he recorded a career-high nine
sacks. He has recorded 36 sacks in his 10-year career.
	Banks is the Redskins' fifth free agent signing, joining wide
receiver Tim McGee, defensive lineman Al Noga, linebacker Rick Graf and
tight end Jim Riggs.
9.404CAMONE::WAYI got a stiffieWed Jun 30 1993 13:3317
There is supposed to be a news conference this morning in Hartford.

Lowell Weicker is supposed to announce plans to build a domed stadium
somewhere in Central Ct (either Hartford's South Meadows, or east of the
river) and to actively pursue getting the Patriots here.

The one thing I know about Weicker is that he wouldn't announce this
unless lots of groundwork had been covered.

If I hear anything more I'll let you know....


'Saw


PS  they also plan on having UCONN play there, moving up to Div I and into
    the Big East football conference....
9.405topic missed by downtime or everybody goo gaa over Baseball?CNTROL::CHILDSthey ought to let em wear dressesTue Jul 13 1993 15:039
 What's next in football? You think they'll just let the QB raise their
 hands next to avoid a sack????

 dam owners are ruining the game to protect their investments...

 IMO the new grounding rule SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

 mike
9.406bad ruleHBAHBA::HAASLower MelvinTue Jul 13 1993 15:089
I'm witcha on the new grounding rule. It blows.

In terms of helping the refs, it makes it a little easier. There's less
of a judgement now so long as the ball goes past the line of scrimmage,
as I understand it. 

Hail, they might as well do away with the whole thang.

TTom
9.407MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR1-4/E13 237-2468Tue Jul 13 1993 15:095
    Ok, I'll bite.  
    
    What's the new grounding rule?
    
    Mike
9.408WREATH::DEVLINIt's just time to say hor d'oevre...Tue Jul 13 1993 15:2021
Mike -

I don't have it all, but the new Quarterback rules are such:

1.)  To avoid a sack, a quarterback can:

	a.  Throw the ball away at any time.  Defender caint hit him or they
	get penalized.

	b.  QB can yell "Ollie,Ollie, Ollie-in-free" and can't be touched.

	c.  Defender can only hit the QB after asking "May I"

	d.  QB's can wear red 'magic' slippers, and when rushed, can click
	them three times and chant "There's no place like home".  When they
	do this, they are transported out of harms way, and a little dog
	bites the defenders kneecaps

	

JD
9.409as I read itCNTROL::CHILDSthey ought to let em wear dressesTue Jul 13 1993 15:246
The rule is: That if the QB is out of the pocket, he may at anytime throw
the ball past the line of scrimmage to avoid a sack.......I'm sure though 
that pocket passer will be allowed the sam latitude as the scramblers...

mike
9.410VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDImus is coming to BostonTue Jul 13 1993 15:504
    	Gee, if they had this rule years ago Eason would still be in the
    league.
    
    				/Don
9.411SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindTue Jul 13 1993 16:223
    So would Johnny Unitas, and probably Otto Graham.
    
    Lee
9.412ROYALT::ASHEAllison: The Kennedy of racing?Tue Jul 13 1993 16:452
    If we had that rule, Doc might, nah, he'd still be the same QB...
    
9.413Add Joe "Willie" Namath too!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Jul 13 1993 17:021
    
9.414WREATH::DEVLINIt's just time to say hor d'oevre...Tue Jul 13 1993 17:073
Joe Willie Namath?  Most overratedQB ever!!!

JD
9.415ROYALT::ASHEAllison: The Kennedys of racing?Tue Jul 13 1993 17:152
    No, that's Bubby Brister...
    
9.416They never called it same way twice anywayAKOCOA::BREENRedsox fever? Take 2 aspirinTue Jul 13 1993 17:2818
    It seems that rule (Int. grounding) was the most difficult to call with
    the most different interpretations depending on ref, qb, teams,
    cities...  Even instant replay didn't seem to help because rule was
    simple but called for a judgement which was colored by precedent in the
    eyes of the ref or announcer, whatever.
    
    This is similar to the legalization of holding a few years back.
    
    And thru it all the defenses manage to prevail.
    
    Joe Willie doesn't come to mind as overrated.  I would look at qbs on
    excellent teams such as 60s balt.,gb;pitt,dallas.  Jim Kelley strikes
    me as most overrated right now.
    
    but then again I was always a Grogan fan and have the poetry to prove
    it
    
    Bill
9.417USCTR1::KINGKey West, where the fun begins.......Tue Jul 13 1993 17:315
    Bradshaw was the most overated, no brainer position... And he proved it.
    If he didn't have stalworth and Swan making he wild throws into
    completions then we would have never heard of him...
    
    REK
9.418a vote for FranHBAHBA::HAASLower MelvinTue Jul 13 1993 17:368
Bradshaw, along with the others mentioned, cain't hold a candle to Fran
Tarkenton. Never has someone done less with more than his efforts with
the Vikings teams. One thing you could count on was that his stats would
be good regardless of outcome.

Kelly has to be way up there on the list of actives, however.

TTom
9.419Remember Tark with NY (football) Giants?AKOCOA::BREENContre nous Toronto et les YankeesTue Jul 13 1993 17:4810
    I remember seeing Tarkenton in Yankee Stadium with the pitiful remnants
    of the Giants in '67 courtesy of my cousin Joe Gergen, then with UPI.
    
    I had migrated south to Jersey prior to service and walked into work
    one monday morning into a giants discussion only to blurt
    
    "Gee, didn't know you folks liked football.  Was looking for someone to
    sit with me on 50 yesterday and had to take my little sister"
    
    Those were hot tickets in those days and tark was amazing
9.420never said that word in my note fella!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Jul 13 1993 18:0718
    
    Joe Willie OVERRATED?????
    
    Overrated????  *I* didn't mention anything at all about his rating, I
    was simply commenting that with this new girly-mon rule, IMO he would
    have been able to play a little bit longer.  You JD, sir, are once
    again demonstrating your uncanny propensity for reading into things
    which don't exist!
    
    You probably still think that Lazzie (sp) Viren was a honest - above
    board runner too!
    
    [isfh]
    
    I remain,
    wondering why anybody would migrate *TO* noo Joisey too!
    Kev
    
9.421Bottom line... Bradshaw wonCTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyTue Jul 13 1993 18:0910
    C'mon REK, git a grip willya!
    
    So the Steelers basically won 4 Supes despite Bradshaw. Tho not the
    mosted gifted and sometimes he looked awful, the man came through in
    the clutch more often than not. He was a winner plain and simple.
    How 'bout dat pass in the Supe agin the 'Boys when he got knocked out.
    The main was a winner.
    
    MikeL
                                  
9.422METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Jul 13 1993 18:124
MikeL from your defense we could have mistaken Bradshaw as an ND
alum.

The Crazy Met
9.423as usual the ND hype machine came through...CNTROL::CHILDSthey ought to let em wear dressesTue Jul 13 1993 18:197
Considering that Bradshaw knocked ND alumi Terry Hanratty to the bench I think
that was awfully generous of Mike.....

of course if Hanratty had gone to Pookepsie U. he'd have never been drafted...

;^)
9.424DECWET::METZGERHiking in Glacier National Park.Tue Jul 13 1993 18:1917
Overrated are 1 year wonders like Doug Williams, Timmy Smith and Jay schroeder.
Overrated are Qb's like Bubby Brister who perform well in 1 playoff game.
Overrated are players like Willie Gault who have speed but can never seem to
catch the ball.
Overrated are college players who've never shown anything in the pros like the
Rocket and still get big press and big money.

Overrated are players like Brian Bozworth and that goof from the packers that
use publicity and steroids in college and don't amount to squat in the pros.

Overrated players choke in the big game more than once(john elway, Jim Kelley,
Fran Tarkenton) 


Overrated players don't set new league records (Joe Namath) or  Win 4 super
bowls (terry bradshaw). 
9.425CTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyTue Jul 13 1993 18:2816
    
    Hanratty was a damn good college QB period. However I do remember him
    spelling Bradshaw on occasion and playing well. Twas a good relief
    pitcher. 
    
    Now the Rocket was/is and always shall be a dynamite returner and
    mediocre receiver. To tell you da troof, I always thought Rocket
    served ND best as a TB in the full house backfield. He could
    hit the holes and was hard to bring down He could handle the short
    swing pass easily. I dunno, I thought he was most dangerous in that
    position. On occasion he could break ya playing flanker, but the man
    could not run a decent pass pattern besides the fly. 
    Has anyone seen any Argo games where the Rocket played TB??
    
    MikeL
    
9.426NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jul 13 1993 18:3610
    > Hanratty was a damn good college QB period. However I do remember him
    > spelling Bradshaw on occasion and playing well. Twas a good relief
    > pitcher. 
    
    Terry Hanratty was/is a Pittsburgh legend.  You won't hear real
    Pittsburghers speaking poorly of ol' Terry Hanratty, nosirree...
    
    glenn
    
9.427Argo Games? When they being held? ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Jul 13 1993 18:5317
    
    >>Has anyone seen any Argo games........
    
    I thought Argo was a cornstarch used to thicken gravy.  Is the Argo
    Games some sort of food fight, complete with clouds of cornstarch
    smoke?
    
    Can you make a rocket out of cornstarch?  Will it fly?  I know you can
    fill a rocket with water, pump it up and it will fly but cornstarch is
    a new one to me.
    
    Wow!  The things you learn about here in sprots....
    
    I remain,
    familiar in the ways of the chef's
    Kev
    
9.428;^)CNTROL::CHILDSthey ought to let em wear dressesTue Jul 13 1993 18:576
ain't from Pittsburg and I agree that he was a good relief pitcher but a
chance to slam ND mustn't be overlooked....

mike    

9.429PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Jul 13 1993 19:136
  I take issue with all of those who said that Bubby Brister was overrated.

  Bubbles was so bad that he never even showed up on any rated list, let alone
  close to the top.

		Keith
9.430GENRAL::WADEI just wanna bang on these drums all dayTue Jul 13 1993 19:265
    
    	Yes he did.  He was ranked #1 in number of times a player's
    	parents were shown to the TV audience.
    
    Claybone
9.431ROYALT::ASHEAllison: The Kennedys of racing?Wed Jul 14 1993 02:243
    Williams played well in more than one year.  He played really well for
    years in TB...
    
9.432HBAHBA::HAASLower MelvinWed Jul 14 1993 13:472
The transition or lack therein from college to pro really isn't much of
a_indicator of overratism. 
9.433And Joe gets all the creditPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 15 1993 13:402
    A point often overlooked in the Jets' improbable Super Bowl victory is
    that one of their backs rushed for 125 yards in that game.
9.434WREATH::DEVLINIt's just time to say hor d'oevre...Thu Jul 15 1993 14:0611
Mac -

That Super Bowl belongs to Matt Snell (the REAL MVP), Jim "3 FG's" Turner, and
the defense, which shut down the Colts offense.  Namath was a sidelight during
the game - his best play being handing the ball off.   Hype, big hype, abouit
Joe's "prediction" makes folks think he was the star of the game.

His prediction is overrated also.  What was he going to say "Yeah, we are going
to get killed by the Colts, I predict they will blow us out..."

JD
9.435Byars a DolphinCSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketThu Jul 15 1993 14:071
Keith Byars is now a Miami Dolphin.
9.436Snell + o-line > JoeTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey and Melanie have a new house...Thu Jul 15 1993 14:217
re: Jets in SB III

Couldn't agree with you guys more.  Matt Snell was clearly the MVP, but Joe 
Willie got it for the hype.  Snell was unstoppable in that game, and was 
playign against one of the best d-lines in football at the time.

=Bob=
9.437Joe Willie had a spell on 'emCTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyThu Jul 15 1993 14:5315
    HAHAHAHA
    
    c'mon boyos, Broadway HypeJoe was the MVP hainds-down. The main
    blabbermoufed the Colts into sneering overconfidence and they
    was beaten before the match. Supa smart outpsyching by Joe Willie.
    Hail, Matt Snell?? Coulda been any one_a_the full backs in them days
    that coulda run through and around that comatose Colts D. HAHAHA.
    Insert Nance, Gilchrist, Hewritt Dixon, even ol' Bob Cappadonna
    into that FB slot and they woulda had a field day...
    
    Open yo' eyes boys!
    
    MikeL
    
    
9.438OL as MVP?METSNY::francusMets in '93Thu Jul 15 1993 15:315
The Offensive Line probably had a little something to do with Snell
getting all those yards.

The Crazy Met
9.439Tagliabue comments on realignmentPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 16 1993 15:0956
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Jul 15, 1993:

--------
Subject: Cowboys open camp as Tagliabue talks on expansion, realignment
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 93 15:57:08 PDT
 
	AUSTIN, Texas (UPI) -- NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue, on hand for
the opening of the Super Bowl champion Dallas Cowboys' training camp,
said Thursday the establishment of free agency clears the path for the
league to focus on expansion and realignment.
	``I think expansion will be the first step,'' he said, adding that
the league has only begun to ``scratch the surface of our discussion and
evaluation'' on realignment. ``It's going to be a second step sometime
down the road.''
	The NFL will make a decision on two new NFL franchises in October.
When and if there is realignment, Tagliabue said the league would not
want to ``destroy what works. Obviously the Cowboys in the NFC East
works. The entire NFC East works.''
	He said the NFC East -- which consists of Dallas, Washington,
Philadelphia, the New York Giants and Phoenix -- is one of the two most
competitive divisions in the league.
	``So if we're looking around to tinker, we're not going to tinker
with the NFC East,'' with the possible exception of Phoenix.
	Tagliabue discussed the possiblity of a Gulf Coast division,
including Houston, New Orleans, Tampa Bay and Miami, and other
realignments that would create strong regional rivalries.
	He said realignment would focus on divisions that came into being 
``by accident,'' such as the AFC Central, which consists of Houston,
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and Cleveland.
	Tagliabue said the league will get into ``pretty intensive
discussions'' on realignment this fall and may make some decisions at
its annual meeting next March.
	Appearing at a news conference with Cowboys' owner Jerry Jones,
Tagliabue said he came to training camp to help the Super Bowl champions
celebrate last year's achievement.
	``It was one of the most extraordinary turnarounds, one of the most
extraordinary achievements in the history of league sports and sports
generally to have come from were they were four years ago to last year's
extraordinary season,'' he said. ``I'm here to celebrate, have some fun,
share some of the excitment with the entire organization.''
	Quarterback Troy Aikman, the Super Bowl MVP, showed up for camp
despite a back injury he suffered while lifting weights in the off
season.
	``Rehab has gone well for me, and I haven't experienced a lot of
setbacks like some people with back injuries do,'' said Aikman. ``I'm
pushing it as much as I can and trying to do as much as I can in such a
short period of time, yet at the same time trying to be careful and
watch for any signs that I may be doing to much.
	Coach Jimmy Johnson said he was not concerned that his team is coming
into camp with too much confidence following last's year success.
	``If they prepare themselves the way we want them prepared and if
they do the things we ask of them, I'm never concerned about a team
being over-confident,'' he said.
	The Cowboys' first practice session is scheduled for 9:45 a.m.
Friday, and Texas Gov. Ann Richards said she planned to attend.

9.440LAGUNA::MAY_BRIntel Inside, again!Fri Jul 16 1993 16:516
    
    Why tinker wif the NFC East at all?  Does anyone care that Phoenix
    isn't geographically in the east?  Leave well enough alone.
    
    brews, who has absolutely no ulterior motives for not wanting
    realignment
9.441METSNY::francusMets in '93Fri Jul 16 1993 16:544
Also the teams in the AFC Central have a healthy loathing for each other.
The rivalries there are great, why spoil it??

The Crazy Met
9.442But Phoenix has nothing to do with itAKOCOA::BREENStill Sox Bandwagon ticks availableFri Jul 16 1993 17:071
    
9.443And....AKOCOA::BREENStill Sox Bandwagon ticks availableFri Jul 16 1993 17:102
    And how about trading Phoenix to the AFC West for Pitt who can return
    to the NFC Beast.
9.444WREATH::DEVLINIt's just time to say hor d'oevre...Fri Jul 16 1993 17:146
How bout having a girly-mon wuss division and put in all them
dumb run and lose teams like Houston, Deeetroit, etc..

And of course, keep the manly NFC East alone.  

JD
9.445LAGUNA::MAY_BRIntel Inside, again!Fri Jul 16 1993 17:155
    
    Keep Phoenix in the East.  I want to be able to go to at least one
    Giants game a year. 
    
    brews 
9.446MKFSB::LONGLife's a dance, you learn as you goFri Jul 16 1993 17:215
	I'd really hate to see the Steelers not given the opportunity to
	put a woopin' on the two teams from Ohio each year.


	billl
9.447METSNY::francusMets in '93Fri Jul 16 1993 17:263
yabbut, Bill, sometimes it works the other way.

The Crazy Met
9.448PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 16 1993 17:261
    But I thought you didn't have any ulterior motives, brews.
9.449WREATH::DEVLINIt's just time to say hor d'oevre...Fri Jul 16 1993 17:2710
Houston is the odd duck in the AFC Central.  Plays in a dome.  Does the Run and
Lose.  Is in Texas.

Cleveland and Pitt are good old rust belt teams.  Cincy is a 'tweener. Caint 
decide if it wants to be a full fledged RunandShootyerselfindafoot or a
manly rust belt type team.  Personally, I'd like to see Pitt and Cleveland
in with da Bears and Green Bay.   Minny and Detroit play in the wuss dome
division withe seachicks, the Oilers, etc...

Jd
9.450LAGUNA::MAY_BRIntel Inside, again!Fri Jul 16 1993 17:408
   > But I thought you didn't have any ulterior motives, brews.
    
    Mac, as a member of the highly esteemed salesscum fraternity, I take
    acceptance, er, exception to your comment that my motives are nothing
    less than pure as the driven snow (at least as pure as the snow driven
    over by Jake after a couple six-packs, anyway).
    
    brews
9.451METSNY::francusMets in '93Fri Jul 16 1993 17:454
Brews, you're a wimp. You start raggin' on JaKe when he's away, lets
see you do it when JaKe is on-line.

The Crazy Met
9.452LAGUNA::MAY_BRIntel Inside, again!Fri Jul 16 1993 18:149
    
    Where have I ragged on Jake?  By calling him the bastion of taste in
    this notesfile, by saying snow is pure after he has pa[i]ssed over it? 
    I have nothing but the utmost respect for Jake, and am quite sure that
    if he thought if he needed womeone to stick up for him, you are the
    last person he'd want to do it.
    
    8^)
    brews  
9.453MKFSB::LONGLife's a dance, you learn as you goFri Jul 16 1993 18:554
	brews gets a 10 on the applause meter!


	billl
9.454QUASER::JACKSONTAYes,Calgon took her away!Fri Jul 16 1993 19:217
      Domes are for sissies!  Artificial turf is for girls that don't want
    to get mud on their joosies!   Put them all in the artificial
    division!!
    
      HTH,
    
      Tim
9.455PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 16 1993 19:263
    Turf is for real men.  Only wimps play on that nice soft natural stuff
    where the worse thing that can happen is a grass stain.  Real men play
    on stuff as hard as blacktop and that can rip flesh off the bone.
9.456VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDRealStoriesOfTheAnimalRescueLeagueFri Jul 16 1993 19:275
    	Hey leave my buddy Brews alone!  Him and I are the only two in here
    that are main enough to stand fast against soccer and all the limp 
    wristed qualities that it stands for!
    
    				/Don
9.457GOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLCTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyFri Jul 16 1993 19:3711
    Aw pshaw dere Slashere,
    
    May Pele kick you upside the haid!
    
    MikeL
    
    PS.
    Ever hit the old Garage (Boston Club) in da early 70's after a Pats 
    game at the Stadium(Harvard)?.
    
    
9.458ROYALT::ASHEI like mine with french fried potatoesFri Jul 16 1993 19:393
    That's the old NFC Central. The new one is leaner and meaner.  We'll
    see at LionsManis...  JD talks about the NFC East, but the Giants are
    in the girly rebuilding stage too...
9.459Perhaps a clarification is in order... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jul 16 1993 19:406
    I'm pretty sure I heard JD say in another note that if they built one a
    them domes for indoor sporting events near him he'd flock to it...
    
    glenn
    
9.460ROYALT::ASHEI like mine with french fried potatoesFri Jul 16 1993 19:423
    NFL is girly compared to the real game anyway.  Arena FB - the 50
    yard indoor war... turf, and tackling into boards...
    
9.461Finally!! A year in the 'burgh wifout "Bubby Ball"!MKFSB::LONGLife's a dance, you learn as you goFri Jul 16 1993 19:485
	I like this!  Camp has just opened, or is gettin' ready to open for 
	most teams, and the NFL note is jumpin' wif activity.


	billl
9.462maybe they don't know how to grow grass?QUASER::JACKSONTAYes,Calgon took her away!Fri Jul 16 1993 20:527
      Yeh and ARTIFICIAL turf ends careers sooner than REAL grass.
    
      For re-alignment,  Dallas should be in the west or south division
    seeing how they aren't even close to being an east team.  Same with
    Atlanta being in the west.
    
      Tim
9.463ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Fri Jul 16 1993 21:588
    Brews, I would never even think of trying and defend Jake, he has a way
    with words that I would not even try to emulate. But 'ya really should
    wait with thos statements until he gets back; but then again you
    yourself mention that you are sales-scum, so I shouldn't be too
    surprised.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.464WREATH::DEVLINIt's just time to say hor d'oevre...Mon Jul 19 1993 13:4210
No Glenn - 

Don't go a twisting - I said that if Bahstan built a dome like toronto, that for
every die hard Sox fan that said they'd never go to a game in it, that 10
wannabe's would flock to the stadium.

I'd only go if they had a hotel and they let guests put on adult shows for 
the fains!  ;-)

JD
9.465This changes more then Tony Kukoc's Height and Weight :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Jul 19 1993 17:427
    I thought they were going to 4 4team division's (in 3 years from now)
    so why do all this re alligning now ?  Are they still planning on
    expanding to 32 teams in like 96 ?  If so they should just add 1 exp
    team to each of the 4 team divisions and then wait for the next
    expansion before realigning...
    
    								MaB
9.466Only 64 teams would make the playoffsTNPUBS::NAZZAROTake me for a little whileMon Jul 19 1993 18:235
    Actually, they plan on having 96 teams by 2032.
    
    Hope this helps,
    
    NAZZ
9.467what about Title IX?HBAHBA::HAASLower MelvinMon Jul 19 1993 18:390
9.468PFSVAX::JACOBMon Jul 19 1993 23:249
    
    >>And how about trading Phoenix to the AFC West for Pitt who can return
    >>to the NFC Beast.
    
    The ol' rumor mill here in the 'Burgh is that when the NFL expands, and
    re-aligns, the STEELERS WILL return to the NFC.
    
    JaKe
    
9.469PFSVAX::JACOBMon Jul 19 1993 23:2718
    
    >>I have nothing but the utmost respect for Jake, and am quite sure that
    
    
    Sheeeeeeeeeit.  <sniff>  If someone has "respect" fer me, I must be
    slipping these days.
    (8^)
    
    
    >>if he thought if he needed womeone to stick up for him, you are the
                                 ^^^^^^^
    
    The question I got, what's a "womeone"????  I had a snappy response fer
    it, but it'd set MtM's "set hidden" finger on fire he'd have to use it
    so freakin' fast.
    
    JaKe
    
9.470WREATH::DEVLINIt's just time to say hor d'oevre...Tue Jul 20 1993 13:195
Its news like the following that makes me miss Bob Hunt:

The Philadelphia Eagles signed QB Bubby Brister...

JD
9.471MKFSB::LONGLife's a dance, you learn as you goTue Jul 20 1993 13:307
	Yeah that sure was music to my ears to hear that!  No place I'd
	rather see that shmuck go than to one of the "Greater New Yuck
	City Area" teams.  The press will chew him up and spit him out,
	much to the chagrin of "dear old ma".


	billl
9.472WREATH::DEVLINIt's just time to say hor d'oevre...Tue Jul 20 1993 13:476
Bill -

Phillyis a greater New York team?  The Eagles are HATED, LOATHED, DISPISED,
and did I say HATED, in New York!

JD
9.473MKFSB::LONGLife's a dance, you learn as you goTue Jul 20 1993 13:556
	From the point of view of a western PA bigot, Philly nothing more
	than a suburb of the "Big Rotten Apple" just like all of New Joisy.


	hth
	billl
9.474those be fightin' words - folks have died for less METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Jul 20 1993 14:115
Bill,

The only good thing about New Jersey is that it separates NY from Philadelphia.

The Crazy Met
9.475Colts sign MajkowskiHBAHBA::HAASLower MelvinTue Jul 20 1993 17:209
Indianopolis has signed Don Majkowski to a 1 year deal worth around $1
mil, plus or minus incentives.

The Colts sign Majkowski as insurance while Jeff George holds out. George
apparently wants out of Indianapolis and has refused to show up at camp.
The Colts have fined George $24K (@$4K per day). Jack Trudeau is
currently listed as the starting QB.

TTom
9.476QUASER::JACKSONTAYes,Calgon took her away!Tue Jul 20 1993 23:285
      I thought George had a $2-3 mil/year contract already.  He hasn't
    proven his worth yet.  Plus, wasn't his contract for something like 11
    years?
    
      Tim
9.477Help neededSNOFS2::THURGARPassion is no ordinary wordThu Jul 22 1993 00:0510
    Quick question.
    
    I need documented proof that Ed "Too Tall" Jones played on the
    defensive line for the Cowboys. This is to settle a bet.
    
    Please send any photocopies to Adam Thurgar. Mail Stop SNO1-1/A2.
    
    Many Thanks
    
    Madge
9.478ROYALT::ASHEI like mine with french fried potatoesThu Jul 22 1993 02:132
    Picture of a football card good enough?
    
9.479overrated over payed, egomaniacsCNTROL::CHILDSthey ought to let em wear dressesTue Jul 27 1993 17:434
 Seems to me Jeff George and Smellway have alot in common....

mike
9.480PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jul 27 1993 17:523
9.481JD woulda loved thisPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 28 1993 15:0029
Article 6586 of clari.sports.football:
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.pennsylvania
Subject: McMahon says Eagles owner kept Randall playing
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 93 7:34:07 EDT
Location: pennsylvania
Lines: 18

	PHILADELPHIA (UPI) -- Former Philadelphia Eagle Jim McMahon says it
was team owner Norman Braman's decision to keep starting Randall
Cunningham as quarterback, a published report said Wednesday.
	McMahon, who was traded to Minnesota last March after three seasons
in Philadelphia, told the Philadelphia Daily News that Braman and
Cunningham were ``tight'' and that worked in Cunningham's favor.
	``It was tough because I didn't feel I should be behind him,''
McMahon said. ``But when you and the owner are tight, you're going to
play.''
	McMahon told the Daily News that he was frustrated by the
organization's refusal to give him a fair shot at becoming the starting
quarterback.
	``I don't have anything against (coach) Rich Kotite. He treated me
real well,'' McMahon said. ``But I knew he was not calling the shots.''
	McMahon, a Super Bowl winner, said the Eagles can and will win games
but will never win the ``Big One'' as long as Cunningham is quarterback.
He said Cunningham is not smart enough in crucial situations to win the
Super Bowl.


    
9.482 :^) GENRAL::WADEMyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWentWed Jul 28 1993 15:418
    
    	I can't wait go read MikeC and Mac's replies about how
    	McMahon is just whining like BBJ.  
    
    	Wait a minute.  Do you think they were just chain yanking?
    	Nah.....
    
    Claybone
9.483PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 28 1993 15:481
    Nobody whines like BBJ.
9.484SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindWed Jul 28 1993 17:006
Funny how some things, and some people, never change.


Wonder if and when McMahon will ever grow up?

Lee
9.485AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSThu Jul 29 1993 13:403
who'se BBJ ?

John "D Cowboys" R.
9.486CNTROL::CHILDSthey ought to let em wear dressesThu Jul 29 1993 13:4714
two interpations:

 Big Bad John Elway as in awful bad, or terrible player, all time intercetion
 leader..

 or

 Big Baby John Elway who want play for Colts and BLAMS(tm) DannyBoy the
 collie lover Reeves for all his problems whine whine whine...

 so glad I could help

 mike
9.487;^)CNTROL::CHILDSthey ought to let em wear dressesThu Jul 29 1993 13:482
sorry folks out of decoders today, you're on your own with the last one....
9.488PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 29 1993 13:541
    What's really scary was this time I understood you.
9.489SI lands in the toiletNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 29 1993 14:0711
    What's the deal with Sports Illustrated wasting precious cover space on
    those two crybaby losers?  SI had feature articles inside on both Mo 
    Vaughn and the resurgent Red Sox and Bill Parcells and the emerging
    Patriots, and either story along with about 100 other possibilities
    would have been preferable to BBJ calling Collie another Hitler and
    Collie telling BBJ to grow up.  What a waste over a complete
    non-story...
    
    glenn
    
9.490PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFThu Jul 29 1993 15:1611
>    What's the deal with Sports Illustrated wasting precious cover space on
>    those two crybaby losers?  

  if (SI == National_Inquirer_of_sports)
	{
	sell_more_magazines;
	make_more_money;
	}
 

		Keith
9.491talk about your losers.....GENRAL::WADEMyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWentThu Jul 29 1993 15:4410
    
    Yo glenn,
    
    	You don't want to read stories about a couple of losers?  Why
    	did you enjoy the stories about the Red Sox and the Pathetriots
    	then? :*)
    
    	East coast bias!  East coast bias!
    
    Claybone
9.492PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 29 1993 15:473
9.493Phoenix has high hopes for the Cards this yearFRETZ::HEISERchase the kangarooThu Jul 29 1993 16:066
    Gary Clark has predicted the Cardinals will go 10-6 this year.  He
    cites their quality defense and improving offense as the main reasons. 
    Youth could be a problem since the team's average age is 25.
    
    I think they won't go anywhere unless they sign Garrison Hearst
    immediately.
9.495I doubt it, you dweebFRETZ::HEISERprime moverThu Jul 29 1993 16:281
    
9.496USCTR1::KINGKey West, where the fun begins.......Thu Jul 29 1993 16:345
    Look out!!! The Phoenix fans are at it again... Howse come the
    Phoenix fans soubd justed liked N_Dume and NS fans?
    Maybe I should kased Jaked?
    
    REKED
9.497PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 29 1993 16:375
9.498SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindThu Jul 29 1993 16:371
Damn, just when I put away my RCASO decoder ring, too!
9.499USCTR1::KINGKey West, where the fun begins.......Thu Jul 29 1993 16:385
    Thats what I get for not using decspell.....
    
    REK
    
    
9.500GENRAL::WADEMyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWentThu Jul 29 1993 16:4910
9.501CAM3::WAYThe thrill of the grass...Thu Jul 29 1993 16:5314
9.502PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 29 1993 16:543
9.503ROYALT::ASHESometimes love just ain't enoughThu Jul 29 1993 17:001
    How many Super Bowls, I mean World Series have they won since 19**?
9.504Just another line on Elway's impressive resume, I suppooseNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 29 1993 17:0613
>>    The Patriots have as many Super Bowl wins as the Broncos.
 >
 >	So why does glenn wanna read about them instead of
 >	the other losers?
    
    Because what they put on the cover was hardly even sports-related.  It
    was a couple of supposed grown men, fitted with bibs and bonnets, 
    slinging applesauce and strained apricots at each other from their 
    highchairs...
    
    glenn
     
9.505Yes, its getting closer to opening day!QUASER::JACKSONTAYes,Calgon took her away!Thu Jul 29 1993 17:1618
      The emerging Patriothetics?  I guess that means they are going for
    2 wins this year!?!?!?!?
    
      The Donks own the lowsy pats team.  Have the pats beat them in the
    last decade?
    
      I  agree making cover on SI says SI wants more $$$ 'cause people will
    read soap opera sports before other stuff.
    
      MikeC,  you act like Elway is the only/biggest whiner.  Jeff George
    Barry Foster, Pepper Johnson, & etc...  Pepper is afraid of moving so
    he sits.  Barry wants Thurmal $$$ that he hasn't proven he deserves. 
    Same goes for George.  If he played good this season then maybe.  Isn't
    George already making around $2.5mil/year?  Elway has never held out of
    camp.  He sticks to his contract.  That does show more class than these
    others!
    
      Tim
9.506PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 29 1993 17:4712
9.507QUASER::JACKSONTAYes,Calgon took her away!Thu Jul 29 1993 17:5211
      re-1
    
      Don't know if he was traded before camp.  I was living is Phoenix at
    the time,  so good sports reporting wasn't there;-)
    
      As to home field,  agreed with the exception of 2 years ago.  Even
    road games says odds are the pats should eventually win.
    
      The donks play the browns on the road again,  but they win there.
    
      Tim
9.508I won't forgit!! 8^)CTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyThu Jul 29 1993 18:056
    Yo,
    I hope I can quote .489 and .490 when SI publishes "Under the tarnished
    Dome" Quel garbage
    
    MikeL
    
9.509GENRAL::WADEMyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWentThu Jul 29 1993 19:298
    
    Mac,
    
    	In this file, loser is anybody who hasn't won the whole enchilada
    	in the last decade.  I don't agree with that.  What do I know.
    	I'm a Bronco fan.  :*)
    
    Claybone 
9.510FRETZ::HEISERprime moverThu Jul 29 1993 19:372
    The decoder rings are safe.  Last I checked, there were no Cardinal
    fans in here.
9.512My Wife loves there logo ????MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Jul 29 1993 19:564
    Well next to the boys there my favorite team in that division :-)
    If Garrison Hurst can do 1/2 of what they want, phoenix could be
    an exciting team to watch....
    								mab
9.513already have tickets for the Pats visitFRETZ::HEISERprime moverFri Jul 30 1993 01:552
    I said last year they were an improving team.  They had some tough
    losses.  I think they'll win 8 or 9 if Hearst is in the backfield.
9.514Bear_down_Chicago_Bears_da_da...CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Fri Jul 30 1993 16:293
    Looks like I got two more years till I'm at loser status...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.515should've gave him 15 for UnsportsmanlikeCNTROL::CHILDSHow'd you get so Rude and Reckless?Fri Jul 30 1993 19:1517
What's to holdout for Tim when Blowland throws money at Elway like
he was some kind of Gawd. I recall Blowland ripping up Smellway's
contract and paying him 2 million a year which he hasn't come
close to earning over his entire career never mind just a year....

With the limited amount of years most RB's play I can't blam Foster
for going for it all now. He was the Franchise last year....

Sure Tim others whine and pout but nobody does it better than BBJ....

My fondest memory of the looser will be getting sacked in the endzone
against the Giants in the Superbowl or watching him spike a ball and
whine cause a ref spoted the ball on the 1/2 yard line insteading
of giving the baby a TD...

mike 
9.516how the mighty have fallenFRETZ::HEISERbeat them until morale improvesTue Aug 10 1993 15:541
    I can't believe the Bengals waived Fulcher.
9.517CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Aug 10 1993 19:193
    I hope the Bears are all over the guy...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.518FRETZ::HEISERbeat them until morale improvesTue Aug 10 1993 22:036
    The Bears (along with many other teams) have had some great ex-Sun
    Devil defensive players.  Fulcher would fit right in.
    
    BTW - for you rotis players keeping score:  As of right now, it appears
    Steve Beurlein will be the new starting QB for Phoenix.  Hearst still
    isn't signed.  Neither is Massey and Eric Hill.
9.519LAGUNA::MAY_BRsquished tomatoesFri Aug 13 1993 00:466
    
    Hearst may sign with the Cards this weekend, they are getting close. 
    Fulcher will be in Phoenix on Monday.  Given that Massey iss still not
    in camp, I'd expect the Cards to sign him.
    
    brews
9.520FRETZ::HEISERbeat them until morale improvesMon Aug 16 1993 16:352
    I still haven't heard anything about them signing Hearst.  They PO'd
    Hill and Massey though.
9.521LAGUNA::MAY_BRsquished tomatoesTue Aug 17 1993 21:165
    Saw that Michael Carter has told the Iggles that he is going to
    retire, which was a surprise to them.  With the loss of White, they
    could be in big trouble onm the front line.
    
    brews
9.522PFSVAX::JACOBFri Aug 20 1993 16:285
    The Redskins have made a trade wif the VIkings, getting QB Rich Gannon
    fer a song...er I mean a draft pick.
    
    JaKe
    
9.523CAM3::WAYSex On The Pool Table with HeatherTue Aug 24 1993 13:1016
Giants cut Stephan "The French Fry Maker" Baker yesterday.


(NOTE:  I cannot take credit for the nickname -- a guy in GIANTS coined
that one)



Who won the Bears-Saints game last night.   Like Dan Dierdork(tm) I too
had trouble getting used to Heyword wearing a Bears uni and Muster wearing
a Saints uni....

But I got bored and watched a re-run of "Northern Exposure".....


'Saw
9.525CAM3::WAYSex On The Pool Table with HeatherTue Aug 24 1993 14:0810
>    Saints 20  Bears 14

Thanks, Karen....


Now I'm glad I watched "Northern Exposure"....


'Saw

9.526ROYALT::ASHEHey... what's going on?Tue Aug 24 1993 15:191
    Bears throw a hail mary on the last play and get tackled at the 4...
9.527Mary was tackled on the 4?OUTSRC::HEISERslow burnTue Aug 24 1993 17:041
9.52838728::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Mon Aug 30 1993 15:539
 If I was Emitt, I'd holdout. Here's the top 4 salaries in the league..

 1. Steve Young     5.35 mil
 2. Smellway        4.775 mil    Blowlin(tm) is certifiable nuts...
 3. Reggie White    4.25 mil
 4. Dan Marino      4.20 mil

 Yup if I was Emitt I'd take the year off.....
9.529$$$???MSBCS::COULOMBEMon Aug 30 1993 16:026
     
     How much is Emitt asking for , And What do the Cowboys think he worth.
    
     I say he might just be worth the Cowboys Whole team.
    
    BC.
9.530I hope he signs soonMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Aug 30 1993 16:5930
    I think the biggest contracts were all written before the Salary Cap
    with the exception of RW ? his might have been when the Cap was already
    known.  But GB needed someone on Defense to stop
    Chicago/Detroit/TB/Minn Running Games...Altought Chicago and Minn's
    Running games are a little less talented this year they still needed
    someone and thats the only reason I can figure that RW got the amount
    he did.
    
    Dallas has to think about the Whole team... who's worth more Rison or
    Irvin ??? Is Irvin going to expect as much or more the Rison, if Emmitt
    gets 4M a year you bet your but.  And what About Aikman, is he wort
    more then a QB who cant win the big one (Elway/Kelly) and is he as good
    as Young ???? If you give Emmitt, Aikman and Irvin what they all want
    and are worth in comparison to the top people in there positions that
    could be 1/3 of your overall Cap to 3 Players...
    
    GB will more then likely be in trouble, with Sterling Sharpe, Brett
    Farve and if they get a top name RB what are they going to want for
    money seeing that RW gets 4+ mil a year...
    
    I think teams have to think about the cap NOW and Dallas is doing that.
    Emmitt might be bringing on more trouble then good... If all teams have
    to worry about the cap for next season, if emmitt holds out how many
    teams will have the 4+ Mil a year free under the cap to pay him and
    will want to spend that much on 1 player ????
    
    Well have to wait and see, I hope they can come to a compromise but I
    think 4+ mil for any one player is a little steep (In any sport).
    
    								MaB
9.531PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Aug 30 1993 17:111
    I thought there was only a salary cap for rookies.
9.532O'Brien and Pinkett cut by PackersCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Aug 30 1993 17:1711
The Green Bay Packers cut Ken O'Brien and Alan Pinkett Saturday.

This leaves a starting job clearly in John Stephens' hands, and leaves them
with only one experienced QB, Brett Farve.  He will be backed up by Ty Detmer 
and {mumble-mumble}, a rookie.

Unless they do the re-sign thing with O'Brien (who is no bargain), I think this 
is a mistake.  Detmer is the main reason the Pack lost to the Patriots a 
couple of weeks ago.  He looked terrible.  Lousy arm and happy feet.

=Bob=
9.533let him sit I say....38728::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Mon Aug 30 1993 17:2616
 Rookies have a salry cap this year. I believe it's 3.1 million per team
 to sign as many rookies as they see fit. 
  
 Next year a team wide cap goes into effect and it's believed the cap will
 be about 31 million. 

 Dallas has the 3 rd lowest payroll in the league and has the room. It does
 have many free agents coming up next year and after that and claims that to
 give Smith what he wants would jepodarize signing these guys. It's all BS
 they can backload contracts etc...

 the bottom line is they hope playing hardball with Emitt will send a message
 to the rest of the boys....

 mike
9.534AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSMon Aug 30 1993 18:036
    I agree with MAB that Dallas is taking this tough stand because of next
    year's salary cap.  In my mind they are doing the right thing if they
    want to build a yearly contender.  While Emmitt may not like it he can
    always go back to school and finish his basketweaving degree.  
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
9.535SALEM::DODAGrip it, zip it and go find itMon Aug 30 1993 18:535
According to Usenet, Barry Word a Viking.

Undisclosed draft choice, probably one of the Donks.

daryll
9.536DECWET::METZGERCome and play, everything's A OK.Mon Aug 30 1993 20:0912
With Okoye on the Dl this means Marty must be expecting a big season from
Harvey Williams and Marcus Allen...

I can't figure this deal out...

Mark Brunell is the 3rd string for Green Bay. While He never showed me much in
his junior season he improved a lot last year (must have been from sitting on
the bench watching Billy-Joe Hobert.) He's looked good in pre-season and will
probably surpass Detmer soon on the depth chart...

Metz
9.537Po' Hugh, first Lisa, now his job, manCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Aug 30 1993 20:137
    
    Dallas cuts Hugh Millen
    
    Can they re-sign him fer lower dinero if he clears waivers?
    
    MikeL
    
9.538DECWET::METZGERCome and play, everything's A OK.Mon Aug 30 1993 20:1615
he's already promised to re-sign with the Cowboys...

I doubt they'll be much claiming off of waivers because if you claim somebody
then they have to be on your 40 man roster and that means you have to cut
another player. 

After the 40 man is determined players can be resigned to fill out the 53 man
roster...

Personally I think it's stupid and confusing but this is the NFL....

What happened to Lisa?

Metz
9.539CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Aug 30 1993 20:2714
    
    Thanks Metz,
    
    Lisa is on the Pats PR staff I believe and is gonna be co-hosting
    a show on SC called "Sports Gals" or whatever. Methinks tis the
    NE variety of SC.
    
    Now I don't know about the Hugh-Lisa relationship, twas just trying
    to git vda Slash going. Ya never know, Hugh goes to Dallas, Lisa
    stays here, outta sight outta mind. Mebbe da Slash has a chance!!
    8^)
    
    MikeL
    
9.540PFSVAX::JACOBAnother day in the VolcamoMon Aug 30 1993 20:307
    re .538
    
    Slight nit, if you claim somebody on waivers, they have to be put on
    your 47 man roster, not 40 man as stated in .538.
    
    JaKe
    
9.541No Pats rejects please!!SPECXN::BROWNReal Men only need 12 bitsMon Aug 30 1993 21:166
	Ugh! Hugh Millan  one the few stupid trades JJ and Co. have made. My
Grandmother could read defense better that this clod. And I know she could
hit the out-n-up better .

  Cadzilla2
9.542Couldda sworn she said it...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Aug 31 1993 13:382
Hey, didn't Karen Derry say she wanted to run the King of the Hill contest 
thised year?
9.544ROYALT::ASHEHey... what's going on?Wed Sep 01 1993 18:232
    Start setting them up Bob...
    
9.545VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady Steady Go!Tue Sep 07 1993 17:236
	First we have Clinton the ultimate wishy-washy, AlanAlda, "Feel 
your pain" type asking "Are you ready for some football", then we get Bon 
Jovi doing the intro song for Monday Night Football!  Somewhere Howard 
Cosell was filling up a puke bucket.  UGH!

				/Don
9.546PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 07 1993 17:345
    So whaddya think of the change to the offsides rule where the D is
    given a warning and then subsequently penalized for going through the
    line when someone from the offense moves.  
    
    My only question is, Why?
9.547CAM3::WAYThe Last in LineTue Sep 07 1993 17:4615
>    
>    My only question is, Why?
>

Because it's the No Fun League.

We don't want anyone getting hurt.  Pretty soon the QBs can wear 
dresses and heels, and the O-line will be able to play in curlers....

And to be quite honest, I watched a lot of games this weekend, and this
has to be the worst opening day for the Refs that I've seen in years.
They were HORRID.


'Saw
9.548downright uglyFRETZ::HEISERnotes from a lost civilizationTue Sep 07 1993 20:577
>And to be quite honest, I watched a lot of games this weekend, and this
>has to be the worst opening day for the Refs that I've seen in years.
>They were HORRID.
    
    The local paper quoted the head of officials calling the Cards-Iggles
    head linesman a "rookie head linesman" after missing the Herschel
    fumble.
9.549CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Fri Sep 10 1993 13:1413
I promised TCM that I'd do some research on how many time the two
teams from the Super Bowl have met in the following regular season.

I did the research last night but forgot to bring the paper with me.


I'll give you a teaser to hold you over till Monday:  It's only happened
3 or 4 times, and mostly, the Super Bowl champ wins the game.


I'll post the results on Monday....

'Saw
9.550One I can rememberOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Fri Sep 10 1993 14:192
    In 1970 the Vikings crushed the Chiefs in a reversal of the previous
    years' Super Bowl.
9.551CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Fri Sep 10 1993 14:2813
>
>    In 1970 the Vikings crushed the Chiefs in a reversal of the previous
>    years' Super Bowl.

Yes, that's one that comes to mind.  


I'll post the list on Monday, or even over the weekend if I can get my
modem working again.....


'Saw

9.552MKFSA::LONGAll gave some, some gave allFri Sep 10 1993 15:324
	I seem to recall the Steelers playing the Rams after beating them
	in '79.

	billl
9.553CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Mon Sep 13 1993 12:467
I still forgot to bring in the paper where I wrote down the stuff,
but after yesterday's game, it's happened four times all told.  Twice
(Minnesota and Buffalo) the losers of the Bowl won the rematch.

I'll remember it tomorrow, I promise....

'Saw
9.554CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Mon Sep 13 1993 12:5024
A few ramblings:


	o Watched the Raiders and Seattle last night.   Jeff Hostetler
	  is doing things he never did for the Giants.  He's scanning
	  both halves of the field and he's not pulling it down to run
	  right away.  In fact, last night I saw him scramble to get
	  more room to run.

	
	o The Patriots' new uniforms and logo sucks.  The blue shirts
	  have got to go.  Drew Bledsoe is going to be good.


	o Dallas looked lost yesterday.


	o Helluva tackle by one of the Buffalo running backs on an
	  interception by Dallas.  The RB pulled the guy down, but he
	  wasn't to the ground so he reached up with his legs, and 
	  scissored him down -- it looked like a WWF move.


'Saw
9.555ROYALT::ASHEWE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R.Mon Sep 13 1993 13:423
    No,  The new logo BLOWS... remember, as A&W said, there's a big
    difference between the two...
    
9.556QUASER::JACKSONTAReal mans sport is starting!Mon Sep 13 1993 13:425
      The Patriots unis are ugly!!  I thought the Broncos orange was
    "loud" and is questionable, but blue, silver and red?  They don't even
    match!
    
      Tim
9.557CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Mon Sep 13 1993 13:5020
>      The Patriots unis are ugly!!  I thought the Broncos orange was
>    "loud" and is questionable, but blue, silver and red?  They don't even
>    match!
    
Some fan or group of fans, paid for one of those "flying signs" that gets
trailed behind an airplane.

It said

	"Bring back red jersies.  The new logo blows"


I couldn't agree more.


I wonder if we had a plane fly around Maynard it'd help to fix our "new
logo"...


'Saw
9.558surprised he got upFRETZ::HEISERnotes from the lost civilizationMon Sep 13 1993 16:394
    Did anyone catch the thigh-shuddering hit Chuck "Heat-Sinking-Missile"
    Cecil laid on Middleton in the Cards-Skins game?  Woah, looked like the
    second coming of Dick Butkus out there.  Helmet was flying and
    everything.  
9.559ROYALT::ASHEWE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R.Mon Sep 13 1993 16:463
    It was a spear... should have been 15 yards... you don't hit a guy in
    the chest with the top of your helmet...
    
9.560eliminatedHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyMon Sep 13 1993 16:5212
It was definitely a_illegal hit with the helmet. It was aggressive but it
shoulda been flagged.

Meanwhile, the following teams have been eliminated from the Super Bowl
Derby. No one has won it having lost its first 2 games: 

New England, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Seattle, Chicago, Tampa Bay,
Atlanta, and

			DALLAS.

TTom
9.561SALEM::DODAGrip it, zip it and go find itMon Sep 13 1993 18:594
Marino joined the 40K passing club yesterday. He's 4th on the 
list with Sir Francis being #1 with 47K. Who are #2 and #3?

daryll
9.563Unitas, FoutsHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyMon Sep 13 1993 19:046
1 Fran Tarkenton
2 Johnny Unitas (or 3)
3 Dan Fouts (or 2)
4 Dan Marino

Montana should join the 40K group later this year.
9.564Marino's number's look very impressive...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Sep 13 1993 19:2012
    1) Fran Tarkenton	47,003
    2) Dan Fouts	43,040
    3) John Unitas	40,239
    4) Dan Marino	40,024
    
    Looking at these number's Marino should pass Unitas in 2 weeks, only
    because he has next week off :-) and if he can average 216yrds per
    game for the season he'll pass Fouts this season as well.  He doesnt
    look that old, how old is marino ?  I wonder if Montana will play the
    next 3 season (Signed a 3 year deal) and how productive he will be in
    those years.  
    								MaB
9.565MSE1::FRANCUSNY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTYMon Sep 13 1993 19:284
    Marino's first season was 1983. So he is probably 33 or 34.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.566Didnt NE pass him up for Eason ..?? :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Sep 13 1993 20:043
    WOW, thats 4K per year ???? A couple more season like that and he
    has the new record and counting...
    							Mike
9.567PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 13 1993 20:123
9.568ahh yes the famed 1983 QB's (0 SB wins!)MSE1::FRANCUSNY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTYMon Sep 13 1993 20:3114
    In the first round that year:
    
    Baltimore (remember them :-) picked Elway
    NE picked Eason
    Jets picked O'Brien
    Buffalo took Kelly (signed with USFL, then ended up in Buffalo)
    Miami took Marino (All AFL East teams - amazing!)
    
    Kelly and Elway (apologies to MikeC) have been as effective as Marino
    in helping their team. Eason and O'Brien each had some good years, but
    nothing close to Marino.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.569LAGUNA::MAY_BRMEts in (last in) 94Mon Sep 13 1993 22:217
  >  list with Sir Francis being #1 with 47K. Who are #2 and #3?
    
  >  daryll
    
    _SIR_ Francis?  Musta been a typo.  Shoulda been Sorry Frances.
    
    brews
9.570PARVAX::WARDLE_MTue Sep 14 1993 00:533
    Didn't O'Brien make the yardage list?
    
    JoJ_NOT
9.571PFSVAX::JACOBOh DOUBLE Woe is Me!!!Tue Sep 14 1993 02:365
    At the Half, the clevescum Skidmarks are beating the 49ers, 20-13n the
    sludgepond.
    
    JaKe
    
9.573PFSVAX::JACOBOh DOUBLE Woe is Me!!!Tue Sep 14 1993 04:079
    
    Couple of minutes left, Skidmarks are going to beat the 49ers, er,
    should I say that the 49ers beat themselves in this one.  Too many
    mistakes to beat even the Wissohiccon Boys Club 9 year old team.
    
    The HALisms and Groanerisms will be unbearable in here tomorrow.
    
    JaKe
    
9.574Thanks in advanceMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 14 1993 12:532
    Anybody have the final, and a scoring breakdown if possible (FFL).
    								MaB
9.575CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 14 1993 13:1825
Okay, here's the information I promised TCM:

(Note:  years listed are associated with the SEASON, not the date of
the Bowl)


In the season following the 1969 Super Bowl, Minnesota beat KC 27-10.

In the season following the 1976 Super Bowl, Oakland beat Minnesota 35-13.

In the season following the 1978 Super Bowl, Pittsburgh beat Dallas 14-3

In the season following the 1992 Super Bowl, Buffalo beat Dallas 13-10.


Of the four games, two champions beat the challengers in the rematch
and two challengers beat the reigning champs.


Sometime, if I'm feeling bored, I'll go back and research those regular
season games before the Bowl that previewed the Bowl (like Giants-Denver
regular season in 1986).


'Saw
9.576QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Tue Sep 14 1993 13:379
      Todd Blackledge came out of that class of 83.  Of course he only
    lasted 5 years or so.  He played for KC.
    
      Last nights 9'r loss was 23-13.  Don't have the breakdown.
    
      Bernie will be on IR if his OL doesn't learn to block.  Vinnie won't
    get them very far after that!
    
      Tim
9.577Six quarterbacks were taken in first round in 1983TNPUBS::NAZZAROReggie Lewis - R.I.P.Tue Sep 14 1993 13:3810
    Re. 9.568:  TCM, you missed one:
    
    1) Baltimore chose Elway with the #1 pick
    2) Kansas City took Todd Blackledge with the #7 pick
    3) Buffalo took Kelly with the #12 pick (around there)
    4) New England took Eason with the #15 pick
    5) Jets took O'Brien with the #23 (or so) pick
    6) Miami took Marino with the #26 pick
    
    NAZZ
9.578scoringHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyTue Sep 14 1993 14:5021
re: .574

MaB,

It went like this:

	Cleveland	a defensive linemand, Jones, ran in a TD
			Michael Jackson caught a TD pass from Kosar
			Stover kicked 3 FGs and had 2 PATs
	San Fran	Marc Logan ran in a TD
			Cofer kicked 2 FGs and had 1 PAT

All in all, very impressive win for Cleveland. You gotta love the defense
that they've built. Having both Jerry Ball and Michael Dean Perry makes
for a long night for the offensive line. Pepper Johnson and Clay Matthews
played well also.

On Offense, I thought the Player O' the Game was Metcalf who constantly
kept SF's defense outta sync.

TTom
9.579Thanks in advanceMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 14 1993 16:261
    anyone have Metcalf's stats ???
9.580he didn't scoreHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyTue Sep 14 1993 17:010
9.581CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 14 1993 17:1317
There was an "illegal hands to the face" call on Sunday in Foxboro.

I couldn't help what some of the old-timers must think of these sissy
penalties these days.

I can remember when the first thing a defensive lineman would do would
be to give his offensive counterpart a big old headslap.  The guard or
tackle would return the favor by sliding his forearm hard up under the
DL's chin.

Now, you can't touch each other hardly.


Is this becoming the sissy, girly-mon, nancy-boy league or what?


'Saw
9.582QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Tue Sep 14 1993 17:204
      Of course it is 'Saw.  They have domes don't they?  They have fake
    grass!
    
      Tim
9.583CAM3::WAYHers for the taking....Tue Sep 14 1993 17:214
>      Of course it is 'Saw.  They have domes don't they?  They have fake
>    grass!
    
It's a damn shame, isn't it?
9.584yupQUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Tue Sep 14 1993 20:021
    
9.585Elliot goneHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyTue Sep 14 1993 20:3017
Article: 6851
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.texas
Subject: Cowboys release Elliott
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 93 12:29:34 PDT
 
	IRVING, Texas (UPI) -- The Dallas Cowboys Tuesday released kicker Lin
Elliott, two days after he missed two field goal attempts in Dallas' 13-
10 loss to the Buffalo Bills.
	The Cowboys were working out numerous kickers Tuesday and were
expected to announce Elliott's replacement by Wednesday.
	Elliott kicked a 43-yard field goal in the second quarter of Sunday's
loss, but missed attempts of 30 and 49 yards. Elliott also missed an
extra point in Dallas' season-opening 35-16 loss to Washington.
	Elliott was in his second year with the Cowboys. He converted 24-of-
35 field goal attempts and 47-of-48 extra points for 119 points last
season.
9.586DECWET::METZGERGood mornin' america, how are ya'?Tue Sep 14 1993 20:3612
Why doesn't san fran have the guts to do the same to Cofer?

Both the x-tra point and field goal he had blocked last night were low kicks
that were marginal at best. Plus he's been erratic for the past 2 years. 

Siefert was stupid to go for the 3 last night when they had 4th and 1 deep
inside cleveland territory. I just knew that the kick would get screwed up some
how. (for those that didn;t watch the holder dropped the snap while trying to
set it up...this was 9:30 PDT so I imagine not many of you were up for it)

Metz
9.587MSE1::FRANCUSNY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTYTue Sep 14 1993 20:444
    Yup I saw that play. 49'ers must have been tired by 12:30AM.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.588Lin "Scapegoat" ElliotTNPUBS::NAZZAROReggie Lewis - R.I.P.Wed Sep 15 1993 14:045
    Lessee if I got this right:
    
    Jones won't pay Smith, so they fire the kicker.
    
    Yup, makes sense to me.
9.589in the worksHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyWed Sep 15 1993 15:0118
ESPN is reporting rumors that Johnson is having a hard time with all this
Emmitt and JJ stuff. Johnson showed his stress when h freaked out in the
press conference.

Supposedly, Johnson has been telling Jones that he should bring Emmitt
back and Jones told Johnson to but out, it wasn't his problem.

This morning they're reporting that Emmitt has dropped his dollar figure
a bit and Jones supposedly said that he now understands that the team
needs Emmitt and that he'll have to come up with a much better offer, one
that is consistent with the other top runners.

Speaking of top runners, meanwhile, the Lions are telling Barry Sanders
that they'll restructure his contract to look more like Thurman Thomas'.
Add that to the Steelers doing the same for Barry Foster and you get the
drift that Jones better up the ante or Emmitt will most likely sit.

TTom
9.591LAGUNA::MAY_BRMEts in (last in) 94Wed Sep 15 1993 17:152
    
    The early open date (week after next) helps the Cowboys,
9.592DECWET::METZGERGood mornin' america, how are ya'?Wed Sep 15 1993 17:3513
I read today the Detriot is gong to restructure Barry sanders contract to give
him Thurman Thomas like money. It's another arrow in Emmitt's negotiating
quiver.

I still think JJ is being stupid about not giving him a decent offer and
worrying about the rest of the team later. Remember football contracts (for the
most part) aren't guarenteed so they can always ax players to get below the cap
next season.


Metz

9.593SALEM::DODAGrip it, zip it and go find itWed Sep 15 1993 17:533
CNN is reporting he signed.


9.594is he eligible for Sunday?FRETZ::HEISERnotes from the lost civilizationWed Sep 15 1993 18:367
    Not surprising.  Was he a holdout or will he be playing Sunday night?
    
    This morning's news reported that Emmitt would accept a pay cut and JJ
    offered to pay him Thurman Thomas-like money.  A compromise was all it
    took, plus Dallas being 0-2.
    
    Mike
9.595AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSWed Sep 15 1993 19:245
    Nazz, Lin Elliott missed a key extra point during the Washington game
    and missed two FG vs the Buffalo Chips.  This on top of all his misses
    during the preseason.  This man could not make a FG to save his life.
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
9.596missing tooHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyWed Sep 15 1993 19:344
Based on the preceding criteria, it shouldn't be too long afore Mike
Cofer gets the boot by San Fran.

TTom
9.597PFSVAX::JACOBNo, I wanna be Frank this time!Wed Sep 15 1993 19:5511
    The saga continues here in the 'Burgh.  Foster's agent and the STEELERS
    are reportedly VEWWY, VEWWY close, but no cigar yet.  Rumor has it that
    they're ironing out the fine print that'll go into the contract.
    
    After Foster signs, the STEELERS are set to make Rod Woodson the
    highest paid defensive back in the NFL, reportedly having a deal worth
    over $3 mil/yr.  They won't finalize that until they're done with
    Foster, though.
    
    JaKe
    
9.598PFSVAX::JACOBTue Sep 21 1993 02:4017
    At the half on MNF, Chiefs 12   Donks 0.
    
    donks are giving a clinic in how NOT to play football.  12 Penalties in
    the first half alone.
    
    BTW, isn't it sorta stupid fer the refs to call a false start:
    
    "False start before the snap"
    
    I mean, how the hell can there be a false start AFTER the snap???  SO
    why say, "before the snap"????
    
    Sounds sorta dumb to me, but then, it's the NFL officials, so that
    explains the dumb part.
    
    JaKe
    
9.599Worthless on the roadELMAGO::BENBACAPut jam in my pockets, I'm toast!Tue Sep 21 1993 03:042
     I figured as much. I mean the Donks can't play football on someone elses
    field. Too bad, for them, all their games aren't at home in Pile it high.
9.600ELMAGO::BENBACAPut jam in my pockets, I'm toast!Tue Sep 21 1993 03:053
    Let us know who finally wins this.
    
    
9.601PFSVAX::JACOBTue Sep 21 1993 03:596
    Late in the fourth, 15-0 Chiefs, Lowery 5 FG's.
    
    I'm outta here
    
    JaKe
    
9.602The denver skunks?ELMAGO::BENBACAPut jam in my pockets, I'm toast!Tue Sep 21 1993 04:391
     Sounds, smells like a skunk to me :-)
9.603MSE1::FRANCUSNY YANKMEES: A SPROTS DYNASTYTue Sep 21 1993 04:477
    15-7 final.
    
    Joe Montana has now beaten ever NFL team except Miami. Of course he did
    beat Denver and Miami in the SB.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.604ELMAGO::BENBACAPut jam in my pockets, I'm toast!Tue Sep 21 1993 05:511
     He has never beaten the niners :-)
9.606What is the network address for CAFEIN?38400::ERICKSONPlease walk under my tree stand....Tue Sep 21 1993 14:336
Hello,

	Can someone post the network address for CAFEIN? I can't access it anymore I get remote node
is unknown.

Ron
9.607smell the COFFEEHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyTue Sep 21 1993 14:457
If'n you're looking for the ::POOL, it's on COFFEE.

	COFFEE::POOL_93

COFFEE is 32.63

TTom
9.608Mack re-signedHBAHBA::HAASPrimus Caverns GuyTue Sep 21 1993 21:4617
Article:   6903
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.ohio
Subject: Browns re-sign Mack
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 93 14:13:43 PDT

        CLEVELAND (UPI) -- Cleveland Browns running back Kevin Mack, who had
announced his retirement during training camp, Tuesday re-signed with
the club. The Browns announced earlier this month that the 31-year-old
Mack reached an understanding to return to the 53-man roster before the
end of September.
        Mack had announced his retirement in July but changed his mind after
discussing it with Coach Bill Belichick. Mack, a 6-foot, 225-pounder, is
entering his ninth season out of Clemson.
        He has spent his entire career in Cleveland and ran for 1,104 yards
in 1985, his rookie season. Mack gained 543 yards last season and has 5,
090 yards in his career.
9.609USCTR1::KINGLook, I can hear what you are thinking.....Wed Sep 22 1993 15:173
    Speaking of Clemson, what NFL team does Rudy Harris play for?
    
    REK
9.610CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Wed Sep 29 1993 14:263
    Rumor mill has Ditka in Atlanta nexted year...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.611LAGUNA::MAY_BRMEts in (last in) 94Wed Sep 29 1993 15:295
    
    There's also a rumor that he'd be here next year if Bugel gets canned. 
    I hope Atlanta wins out...
    
    brews
9.612The man in black in doneOURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen 592-5249Wed Sep 29 1993 15:306
>>    Rumor mill has Ditka in Atlanta nexted year...
    
>>    Chip_GSH_Bach


Why wait... that falcon is basting on the rotisserrie now. 
9.613Pardee shakyHBAHBA::HAASBroons roolzWed Sep 29 1993 15:3411
Glanville isn't the only one on the hot seat.

Supposedly, the only reason Jack Pardee is still the coach at Houston is
that no one else is going for it. At least this is what that guy on ESPN,
Edleman (sp?) is saying. And having Buddy Ryan run his mouth and then
fielding a substandard defense ain't helping much either.

But the season is young and maybe around Thanksgiving time there be a
complete list of who's on the way out.

TTom
9.614kill 2 birds with 1 coachFRETZ::HEISERAWANAWed Sep 29 1993 15:432
    Brews I'd rather have Ditka here.  He'd build a winner for sure and put
    Bidwill in his place in the process.
9.615LAGUNA::MAY_BRMEts in (last in) 94Wed Sep 29 1993 16:128
    
    Ditka won _once_ with a defense built by Buddy Ryan (look what the
    Bears did after Buddy left) and over the coarse of the seven years
    following the championship managed to alienate everyone else on the
    team.  People were expecting great things from the Bears after '85, and
    what happened? One (maybe, I'm not sure) NFC Championship appearance.
    
    boC    
9.616exitCNTROL::CHILDSERS, cause everybody can't play U2Wed Sep 29 1993 16:134
 Ditka's more over-rated than Dan Reeves or any other cowpoke to come out
 of Dallas for that matter. If ever a team won a superbowl inspite of their
 coach the Bears were it. The man makes for great copy but that's it.
9.617Yea rightELMAGO::BENBACAI don't need no stinking Package!Thu Sep 30 1993 02:161
     Typical Anti Dallas crap. 
9.618truth hurts don't it...CNTROL::CHILDSThat SIR is an Unmitigated FabricationThu Sep 30 1993 12:460
9.619CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Thu Sep 30 1993 14:444
    Ditka took a terrible team and left with a great record, considering he
    had a few 6 (or less) win seasons...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach 
9.620PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 04 1993 15:225
    The winningest franchises since the merger of the AFL and NFL:
    
    Dolphins
    Redskins
    Raiders
9.621\QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Mon Oct 04 1993 15:271
      So the faids aren't the winningest.
9.622PFSVAX::JACOBUmgwana Cik BuudieMon Oct 04 1993 19:2611
    Geeeeeeeez, the Bubster does a relief appearance fer Cunningham and
    pulls a game out of his big butt fer the Eagles.
    
    Jsut wait'll nexted week when, being that Bubby will be starting, he'll
    send mommy some tickets and they'll be showing her every emotion
    between plays.
    
    Brister has had his obligatory 1 good game per season, so the Iggles
    are headed down the chute.
    
    JaKe
9.623DECWET::METZGEROwner of the scorpion petting zoo.Mon Oct 04 1993 20:099
Philly will be scrambling for some serious Qb blood after watching bubble play
1 full game....They might even be wishing for Kemp...Ho-Ho....

Are their any decent QB's available from other teams? Will the eagles beg
Flutie to come back from the CFL to lead them to the promised land?

Metz
 
9.624PFSVAX::JACOBUmgwana Cik BuudieTue Oct 05 1993 03:104
    Fish clip Skins, 17-10.
    
    JaKe
    
9.625USCTR1::KINGLook, I can hear what you are thinking.....Tue Oct 05 1993 11:354
    The Eagles signed Ken Obien as a back-up QB......
    
    
    REK
9.626"In Bubby we trust"CNTROL::CHILDSThat SIR is an Unmitigated FabricationTue Oct 05 1993 12:2010
>>    The Eagles signed Ken Obien as a back-up QB......
    
    
    The only guy in the league that can make Bubby look good......

  ;^)

 mike

9.627QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Tue Oct 05 1993 13:566
      Flutie, NFL & promised land should not be mentioned in the same note!
    
      Maybe the Vikes will let McMahon go back to Philly?  I know he and
    Crandol will get along well!
    
      Tim
9.628(tm)16421::HEISERAWANATue Oct 05 1993 15:382
    Football: the sport where strange men fight over the chance to play QB. 
    Losers settle for playing pattabutt.
9.629PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 05 1993 17:031
    Who is Ken Obien?
9.630Kenon?HBAHBA::HAASOver the wallTue Oct 05 1993 17:074
Didn't he used to write some of the Simpson's shows? He's rumored to be a
late night talk show host but that can't be confirmed.

TTom
9.631AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSTue Oct 05 1993 18:564
    Where's Chappy been ?  Every time the Faiders lose he seems to
    disappear.  How about dem Raiders ?
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
9.632CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Oct 05 1993 18:586
    How 'bout them overrated ex-Irish there mikey??
    
    Brown, Rocket, Montana...
    
    MikeL
    
9.633PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 05 1993 19:042
    Chappy's busy over in the Yankee note trying to defend a Donnie "A
    shadow of his former baseball self".
9.634ROYALT::ASHECenter wanted: Inquire with Don ChaneyTue Oct 05 1993 20:551
    K-K-K-Kenny at the Vets?
9.635QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Wed Oct 06 1993 00:091
      I see Hieser geering up for more crow...
9.636PFSVAX::JACOBTue Oct 12 1993 02:068
    At the half, Buffalo is turing out the lights on the Moon, leading 28-7
    with the Oilscum giving up the ball 3 times on turnovers in the first
    half.
    
    Ain't it a shame Doc Midnight ain't here to take the heat????
    
    JaKe
    
9.637PFSVAX::JACOBTue Oct 12 1993 03:0914
    Couple of minutes left, 35-7 Buffalo.
    
    Houston had 6 turnovers in the game.  Got flagged on two consecutive
    plays for the defense having too many men(men used loosely) on the
    field, then had to call a timeout so they could get the defense right
    or they would have been flagged for too many on the field on THREE
    consecutive plays.
    
    Warren Moon's best days of his career are behind him.
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
    
    JaKe
    
9.638exitMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Oct 12 1993 12:005
    anyone have the box scores, my ffl league give's bonus pts on
    things like over 100yrd's rush, rec, and QB pasing over 300yrds
    The usa today only has who scored... Thanks in advance.
    
    								Mike
9.639ROYALT::ASHEDon't play dat song, dat Achybreaky songTue Oct 12 1993 12:442
    Called Doc lasted night at halftime... no answer...
    
9.640LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesTue Oct 12 1993 15:162
    
    It's days like today that I really miss the Doc.  sniff
9.641PFSVAX::JACOBTue Oct 12 1993 19:1310
    
>>  <<< Note 9.639 by ROYALT::ASHE "Don't play dat song, dat Achybreaky song" >>>

>>    Called Doc lasted night at halftime... no answer...
    
    Ya might want to pay him a visit and make sure he ain't standing on a
    chair with the rope around his neck.
    
    JaKe
    
9.642ROYALT::ASHEDon't play dat song, dat Achybreaky songTue Oct 12 1993 20:022
    He'd have to stand on a chair to approach eye level..
    
9.643METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Oct 12 1993 20:073
you guys are vicious!

The Crazy Met
9.644PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 13 1993 13:013
    The Falcons and the Packers have swapped running backs.  The Packers
    get Eric "Oops" Dickerson in exchange for John "I haven't been the same
    since I put that guy in the hospital" Stephens.
9.645but wait, there's more.....CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesWed Oct 13 1993 13:038
    
    	Yabbut plus, the Falcons also got 1-2 other players and (I think)
    a draft pick.
    
    I remain,
    amazed anybody thinks Stephens can be any good!
    Kev
    
9.646PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 13 1993 13:077
    Stephens was showing flashes of his former self last year for New
    England.  He was also becoming a force to be reckoned with as a
    receiver out of the backfield.  I think he could have helped the Pats
    this year, especially in that capacity.
    
    Interesting rumor going through the mill -- Moon to Miami to replace
    injured Marino.
9.647ROYALT::ASHEDon't play dat song, dat Achybreaky songWed Oct 13 1993 14:172
    Green Bay got Pickens, the Falcons got a conditional draft pick.
    
9.648The show should be Moonlighting MiamiROYALT::ASHEDon't play dat song, dat Achybreaky songWed Oct 13 1993 14:181
    Moon over(to) Miami?  Sounds like the makings for a song or TV show.
9.649QUASER::JACKSONTAReal man's sport has started!Wed Oct 13 1993 16:034
      Man them oilers are looking for any 'scape goat they can find.  How
    about a new owner?
    
      Tj
9.650METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 13 1993 16:235
> I think he could have helped the Pats this year

ain't nothin' that can help the POats this year.

The Crazy Met
9.651LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesWed Oct 13 1993 16:476
    
>    ain't nothin' that can help the POats this year.
    
    A few more games against the Cards certainly wouldn't hurt!
    
    brews
9.652METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 13 1993 17:376
re: .651

And from the man who predicted a Super Bowl victory for the Cards, no less.
Brews, you ready to put in a reply in topic 50??

The Crazy Met
9.653LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesWed Oct 13 1993 17:436
    
    boC made the prediction, note 132.11, I believe.  boC is a different
    personality than me, if'n you catch my drift.  And he is no welcher on
    p_name bets or crow notes, as some people might accuse TC*.
    
    brews, or boC_not
9.654go figure16421::HEISERvisualize whirled peasWed Oct 13 1993 20:052
    The Pats want to play the Cards 16 times, and the Cards want the 'Skins
    16 times.
9.655PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 14 1993 14:322
    Warren Moon has been benched in favor of Cody Carlson for this week's
    game against the Pats.
9.656John StephensPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 15 1993 19:0524
    Kev was wonderin' about John Stephens a few days ago.  Here's some
    interesting info on him.  (BTW, Dickerson flunked Green Bay's physical
    -- something about a bulged disk).
    

   clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Oct 12-13, 93:

--------
Subject: Falcons trade Dickerson to Packers
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 93 13:35:32 PDT
 
	ATLANTA (UPI) -- 
    
    ...
    
	Stephens was a first round draft pick of New England in 1988 after
starring at Northwestern State in Louisiana and was the NFL Rookie of
the Year.
    ...
	The 27-year-old Stephens led the Patriots in rushing for three
consecutive seasons before being traded to Green Bay in the off-season.
Stephens had seven 100-yard games with the Patriots and was leading the
Packers in rushing this season with 173 yards in five games.

9.657A Minny Soap OperaMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 15 1993 19:5914
    I beleive Bennett is seeing all the action in GB these days, it looks
    like bennett gets more carries every week and as of this week has
    passed stephans in carries, but not yards.  Bennett is the #2 receiver
    on GB with 19 rec for 132 yrds stephans only has 5 catches all season.
    Neither of them seems to have any fumbles ?   For you FFL's stephans
    just got his first TD, while bennett has 4, neither has seen a 100yrd
    games yet this season.
    
    Now Im a bit confused, the USA today says the Trade was voided, yet
    Stephans was in a Falcons Uniform last night ? Is stephans a Falcon
    or a packer ???  And for that matter where is Eric now, someone said
    GB Waived him ????
    
    								MaB
9.658PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 15 1993 20:034
    Reports I've read (in the American Football Conference I think), say
    that the deal was consummated (i.e. Stephens stays put), but the
    Falcons and Green Bay are working something out (maybe the draft pick
    isn't included) to compensate GB for Dickerson failing the physical.
9.659ouch!HBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutTue Oct 19 1993 15:456
Transaction of the year:

Cowboy LB John Roper fell asleep during a team meeting. Jimmy Johnson cut
him.

TTom
9.660PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 22 1993 14:349
    Good Morning America had a couple of guys on this morning to talk about
    the Houston player who had his paycheck witheld for staying home with
    his wife and newborn.  They had a former MLB pitcher who retired from
    baseball in order to spend more time with his family and one of the
    guys who covers the NFL for SI.  Both seemed to think the actions of
    the Oilers was appropriate.  They also said they respect the guy for
    establishing his priorities and sticking to them.
    
    Both of my kids were born in the off season.
9.661Millen now the 3rd string QbSPECXN::BROWNReal Men only need 12 bitsFri Oct 22 1993 14:468
	re.658


   It could have been worse. Jimmy could have traded him to the Pat's for 
another useless QB.

  Cadzilla2
9.662How much would you have been fined?16421::HEISERvisualize whirled peasFri Oct 22 1993 16:061
>    Both of my kids were born in the off season.
9.663Sullivan wins round 1 vs. NFLPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 25 1993 16:4112
    The NFL lost another court battle.  Billy Sullivan, former owner of the
    New England Patriots, successfully sued the NFL.  His suit claimed that
    the NFL forced him to sell the New England Patriots to Victor Kiam
    below market value.  A Boston jury agreed and awarded Sullivan $38
    million which was trebled under the antitrust laws.  The NFL is
    naturally trying to appeal.
    
    With his winnings, Billy can almost buy himself back into NFL.  He said
    he wouldn't consider it as long as Tagliabue is still commissioner,
    though.  Billy's lawyer thinks this case will set a precedent whereby
    the cities who don't get awarded expansion franchises can sue the NFL
    for turning them down.
9.664VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDFrog Baseball Rooolz!!!!Mon Oct 25 1993 16:545
    	If I were old Billy I wouldn't be spending the money just yet,
    because the NFL has a good chance of winning on appeal where a dummy
    dozen isn't involved.
    
    				/Don
9.665METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Oct 25 1993 17:115
yeah, real tough for Sullivan to win with a Boston jury. Anyway aren't the
Sullivan's still in a pile of debt - money would need to be used for that
first.

The Crazy Met
9.666VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDFrog Baseball Rooolz!!!!Mon Oct 25 1993 17:227
    	Craze, as long as Alioto is the lawyer he could win in any town. 
    He's famous for packing juries with ninnies who'll believe his "David
    versus Goliath" yarns that he spins in trials against the NFL.  As I
    said in a previous note the appeal will be heard by someone with a
    semblance of a clue.
    
    				/Don
9.667METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Oct 25 1993 17:316
who was the players lawyer in the McNeil case??

I assume an appeal goes before a 3 judge panel - or something like that -
and not a jury. right??

The Crazy Met
9.668PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 25 1993 17:353
    Sullivan's case basically came down to him selling the Pats for $80
    million while the NFL put a price tag of $140 million on an expansion
    franchise.  It wouldn't be too tough to sell that to any jury.
9.669The Will McDonough watch day 4AKOCOA::BREENMon Oct 25 1993 17:364
    I'm anxiously awaiting his version of this think which should explain
    the nfl strategy in trying to overcome this verdict.  I think the
    amount being reduced is the likely outcome.  Billy will net 10 - 20
    when done.
9.670paid for itselfHBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutMon Oct 25 1993 17:388
Actually, in the league's previous "success" on appeal, it's only been
the money that was changed. In the monopoly case where millions were
awarded, the appeal did not overturn the guilty result it just changed it
to a dollar which trebled gave the new award of 3 bucks.

Of course the money is the whole issue, ain't it.

TTom
9.671METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Oct 25 1993 17:455
actually the judgment that cost them $3 was not on appeal. This was the 
USFL suit against the NFL and the original jury awarded the USFL $1 which
was tripled to $3.

The Crazy Met
9.672NFL vs. the Sullivans: too bad someone had to win...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 25 1993 17:5725
    >                  -< The Will McDonough watch day 4 >-
    
    Yup, on these matters official NFL (NBA, NHL, MLB) house man Shill 
    McDonough manages to come in about 95% wrong.  It's his function in 
    life to pass on such utter propagandist nonsense as his latest and
    greatest effort of "the Celtics would have lost $3M last year had 
    Larry Bird played and collected his salary so there's no way that they 
    can afford to win a lottery pick and pay him..."
    
    The fact is that despite some irrelevant local media bleatings on the
    subject of Billy Sullivan as bumbling businessman, it really doesn't 
    matter how stupid he had been in the past or how many times he changed 
    his mind on the issue of public ownership, as long as it can be proved 
    that he was financially damaged by an NFL action in violation of 
    antitrust law.  Because Sullivan had to sell at $80M and the Patriots' 
    franchise value is now in excess of $125M (probably closer to $150M) any 
    last-gasp, desperate attempt he made to keep himself afloat that was 
    subsequently shot down by the NFL must be taken seriously.  The NFL's 
    double standard with regard to the 49ers' ownership (and others) is 
    well-documented, and no matter how much a hypocrite Sullivan is about
    his motives, it looks like he had a pretty good case after all...
    
    glenn
    
9.673METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Oct 25 1993 18:025
The question also is did his last-gasp effort have a prayer of working?
Doesn't sound like anyone believes he really could have sold shares in
the Pats even in 1986.

The Crazy Met
9.674VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDFrog Baseball Rooolz!!!!Mon Oct 25 1993 18:588
    	Let's not forget that Billy was trying to sell stock for a team
    that was 100 million dollars in debt.  The league bent over backwards by
    letting him "borrow" from the player's deferred payment cache.  The NFL
    needs some kind of rules to prevent bankruptcy court judges from taking
    over and running an NFL franchise when it gets too far into debt (like
    the Patsies were).
    
    				/Don
9.676Charlotte, St. Louis HBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutTue Oct 26 1993 14:2319
Today's the day the NFL decides who gets to pay them a couple hunder mil
for he right to join the club.

Baltimore has 2 different owner groups and is expected to compete with
St. Louis for a_old NFL city. For some reason the league seems to be
leaning strong toward St. Louis which finalized its money situation
yesterday. A little late seems early enough. Give the nod to St. Louis
who has already started building the stadium.

Charlotte is the front runner for a new NFL city. Memphis has attracted a
lot of attention with their team name, The Hound Dogs, showing the Elvis
connection. Dallas owner Jerry Jones has endorsed their efforts which
isn't news considering a business associate is part of the group.
Jacksonville started and stopped a couple of times with their drive and
suffer from being in the smallest TV market of the 5 teams and from the
fact that neither the Dolphins nor the Bucs sell out. Give the nod to
Charlotte who has already billed this noter for a Personal Seat License.

TTom
9.677METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Oct 26 1993 14:265
Well, it could take the owners a while. Seems that a city needs 21 of 28
votes, and they are not eliminating the city with the lowest number
of votes after each round.

The Crazy Met
9.678done deal16421::HEISERvisualize whirled peasTue Oct 26 1993 14:441
    My money is on Charlotte and St. Louis.
9.679UPI on Owners MeetingPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 26 1993 15:4857
   clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Mon, 25 Oct 1993:

--------
Subject: NFL owners to meet in Chicago to select two expansion clubs
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 16:10:05 EDT
 
	CHICAGO (UPI) -- The National Football League's two expansion
franchises will be determined this week when club owners meet starting
Tuesday in Chicago.
	Owners will select two clubs from the five finalists--Baltimore, Md.,
Charlotte, N.C., Jacksonville, Fla., Memphis, Tenn., and St. Louis, Mo.
The two new clubs will pay close to $150 million each to join the NFL
for the 1995 season and expand the league to 30 teams.
	The Baltimore team would be known as either the Bombers or the
Cobras, depending on which of the two groups bidding for the expansion
franchise is selected. One of the groups is headed by billionaire
investor Malcolm Glazer. Plans are for a new 70,000-seat stadium next to
the Baltimore Orioles' hugely successful Oriole Park at Camden Yards.
	The St. Louis team probably would be called the Stallions. Investors
are building a 70,000-seat domed stadium. James Orthwein, who owns the
New England Patriots, had been a partner in the bidding group but
recently reduced his role to limited partner. The head of the investment
group had been Jerry Clinton, but Clinton withdrew Monday and Greg
Kroenke has taken over the leadership of the St. Louis entry.
	St. Louis is the largest television market in the United States
without an NFL team and is the home of Anheuser-Busch, a prime
advertiser for the league. There are questions, however, regarding fan
support in view of the Cardinals' move out of the city to Phoenix.
	Memphis lists the estate of late rock legend Elvis Presley among its
investors and as a tribute will be called the Hound Dogs if chosen. In
addition to the Presley Estate, the investment team includes financial
heavyweights William Dunavant and Paul Tudor Jones. The main drawback
the Memphis investors need to overcome is a less-than-attractive playing
facility in the Liberty Bowl.
	Jacksonville's team probably would be called the Jaguars. The
investment group is headed by J. Wayne Weaver. The group pulled out of
the running for a franchise this year and then announced that it was
back.
	Jacksonville has a good facility in the 70,000-plus Gator Bowl but is
the smallest television market of the five candidates.
	Charlotte's team has been called the Panthers. The chief investor is
former NFL player Jerry Richardson, who heads the highly successful
Flagstar Companies food service chain. Charlotte investors plan a 72,
000-seat stadium.
	A number of NFL owners have expressed a keen interest in getting the
league into the fertile Carolinas area market and create regional
rivalries with Atlanta, the Florida clubs and Washington.
	Also on the owners' agenda this week is the selection of Super Bowl
sites for the January, 1997, and January, 1998, championship games. New
Orleans, San Diego and Tampa Bay are in the running for the 1997 game
and San Diego, Tampa Bay and Los Angeles are bidding for the 1998 title
game. The four cities competing to host the Super Bowls have been the
site for 17 of the 27 Super Bowls.
	The 1994 Super Bowl will be held in the Georgia Dome in Atlanta. Joe
Robbie Stadium in Miami will be the site for the 1995 game and Sun Devil
Stadium in Phoenix will host the 1996 game, Super Bowl 30.
9.680UPI on Sullivan Lawsuit vs NFLPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 26 1993 15:5746
   clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Oct 20-25, 1993:


Subject: Sullivan wins $114M from NFL and club owners
	BOSTON (UPI) -- The National Football League and 21 team owners were
ordered by a federal jury to pay former New England Patriots owner
William Sullivan $114 million in damages Friday for barring him from
selling stock in the club in the 1980s.
	``Thank God. Justice was done,'' said a beaming Sullivan outside the
U.S. District courtroom where the verdict was handed down.
	The league immediately announced it would appeal, but Sullivan's
chief attorney, former San Francisco Mayor Joseph Alioto, predicted the
award would stand.
	``Jackie Gleason said it best, 'How sweet it is!''' said Aliotto. He
said he would seek $25 million in attorneys fees for Sullivan's legal
team, in addition to the award.
	Alioto also predicted the verdict would have far-reaching effects on
the league, including the granting of new franchises and salary caps on
rookie players.
	``The significance of the case is that the NFL walls of monopoly will
come tumbling down,'' he said.
	Sullivan claimed the league's refusal to let him sell 49 percent of
the Patriots to the public in a stock offering in 1987 forced him to
sell the team to Victor Kiam, owner of the Remington electric shaver
company, in 1988.
	At the time, Sullivan was in deep financial trouble, in part because
of a failed $20 million investment by his son, Chuck, in a world concert
tour by singer Michael Jackson.
	The sale would have required an exemption from league rules, but
then-Commissioner Pete Rozelle recommended against it, and a majority of
owners supported his decision.
	Sullivan, who bought the team in 1959 for $25,000, sued the league
and club owners for $116 million, triple the amount he claims he lost
because of the league's action.
	In addition to the Patriots, the suit exempted six teams -- the
Raiders, 49ers, Eagles, Dolphins, Giants, Chiefs -- because, Alioto said,
their owners had sued or ``stood up to'' the NFL in various ways over
the years.
	``The independent owners were left out (of the suit) and the stooges
were left in,'' he said.
	Alioto, who is Sullivan's son-in-law, said virtually every ruling
from the bench during the trial went in favor of the league, and said, 
``There's really nothing left to appeal, believe me.''

    
9.6812 new cities?AIMHI::SMILLERTue Oct 26 1993 18:015
    
    Has anyone heard what two cities will get the new expansion teams.
    
    
    steve
9.682later today, possibly17318::DABLERIs it 1996 yet?Tue Oct 26 1993 18:2816
RE :   <<< Note 9.681 by AIMHI::SMILLER >>>
>>     -< 2 new cities? >-

    
>>    Has anyone heard what two cities will get the new expansion teams.
    
    steve,

	This will be decided later today.  It's only 2:30 here in the MidWest 
	and the group from St. Louis isn't scheduled to present to the NFL 
	owners until 3:00 CDT.  

hope this helps...

Jim()

9.683QUASER::HUNTERHow Do You Spell Win... G L Y NTue Oct 26 1993 18:463
    Waiting with baited breath in colorado !!
    
    BG
9.684PFSVAX::JACOBWolf, Wolf, Wolf...Tue Oct 26 1993 19:126
    re.683
    
    Want me to fax ya some Listerine?????
    
    JaKe
    
9.685QUASER::HUNTERHow Do You Spell Win... G L Y NTue Oct 26 1993 19:156
    Jake...
    
    How ya doing...  Pretty disgusted after that poor ST performance on the
    part of your squeelers, aye !?!
    
    BG
9.686PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 26 1993 20:024
9.687MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Wed Oct 27 1993 00:587
    
    Charlotte got one of the expansion teams: Carolina Panthers.
    
    Other one will be decided on, on November 30th.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.688PFSVAX::JACOBWolf, Wolf, Wolf...Wed Oct 27 1993 02:524
    --dan'l be a happy man tonight.  Probably gone swimming to celebrate.
    
    JaKe
    
9.689GENRAL::WADEPull!Wed Oct 27 1993 12:455
    
    	Now that Charlotte has a football team, when will New England
    	get one?
    
    Claybone
9.690Go Panthers! Watta team!HBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutWed Oct 27 1993 13:4013
Both Dan'l and BobHunt have bought season tickets. Actually, they bought
a Personal Seat License which gives them the right to buy season tickets.
It's with no small irony that BobHunt will get to start his fandom in
Clemson's Death Valley, the scene of near continuous carnage of his
'Hoos.

The city of Charlotte has already got it's money worth outta all this.
The party down town started with indoor fireworks, then outdoor
fireworks, then the whole party moved outside into the streets. A good
time was had by all, especially those of us who had a basketball game to
warm up with.

TTom
9.691I'm jealous16421::HEISERvisualize whirled peasWed Oct 27 1993 14:121
    Phoenix deserves one before New England does.
9.692Generated a lot of up-front capital...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 27 1993 14:3512
> Both Dan'l and BobHunt have bought season tickets. Actually, they bought
> a Personal Seat License which gives them the right to buy season tickets.
    
    Yeah, I read where those babes went for $600-$2500 just get your foot
    in the door with an option.  The Charlotte group certainly capitalized 
    on the fanatical desire to bring the NFL there-- I don't think there's 
    much doubt but that the Carolina fans were the most desirous and ambitious
    of all the candidates...
    
    glenn
     
9.693METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 27 1993 14:383
Glenn, actually $5,000.

The Crazy Met
9.694up to >$5K and risingHBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutWed Oct 27 1993 14:5916
There was a pretty wide range of PSL prices. The one that I'm in on costs
$2700 and that'll give me a right to buy a $600 season ticket. We're in a
fair to middlin section. 

BobHunt, being the elitist that he is, and Dan'l, being the urban swimmer
that he is, bought the next range up and paid $3600 for their PSL.

Downstairs, mid field PSL went for $5400.

Now the kick in the pants will be for anyone who wants to buy a remaining
PSL. In the effort to sell the place out, the Richardsons said in no
uncertain terms that these PSL prices were like pre-construction. Those
who didn't buy them then and want them now will be paying more than those
of us who more or less bought these thangs on faith.

TTom
9.695Expand by 4 and make everybody happySNAX::ERICKSONPlease walk under my tree stand....Wed Oct 27 1993 15:008
    
    	The problem is that some of the owners want Baltimore as the
    other franchise. If they do that Ortwein will move the Pats to St.
    Louis. They should just make it easy and add 4 teams. We'll be stuck
    with the Pats, St. Louis gets a team. Then you make Jacksonville or
    Memphis happy also.
    
    Ron
9.696fixed for St. LouisHBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutWed Oct 27 1993 15:0817
Memphis is talking like what everyone seems to suspect: the deck is
rigged for a team to go to St. Louis. 

Evidently, or at least so the rumors go, the league wanted to be able to
award St. Louis the franchise yesterday along with Charlotte. But
apparently there's a little trouble in paradise between 2 different
groups who want to own the team. Evidently, at or about the time when the
city was to be making its presentation, all manner of jurisprudence
started to come outta the wood work between the factions. For this or
other reasons the league opted to give the city a couple of weeks to make
a better case.

The Memphis owner was quoted as saying that if'n the franchise is awarded
to St. Louis he would take that as "... we have not prbably been dealt a
straight deck". Comments which will no doubt not improve his standings.

TTom
9.697MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Wed Oct 27 1993 15:1716
    According to the Globe and a writer from St. Louis interviewed 
    on WEEI, the NFL owners are a little law suit leary at this point.

    Fran Murray, of carpet bagger and bad hair fame, is the head of
    what is left of the original St. Louis group.  He claims that he
    has the right to the team.  His money man is none other than
    Leonard "Hit me, and Get me another drink" Tose.  Not the most
    desirable ownership group, huh?

    The writer from St. Louis thinks the delay is to allow the new
    group to get it's act together, and resolve any potential law
    suits from Murray.  If the situation is cleaned up by the next
    meeting, Baltimore might just get the team to avoid a legal 
    battle.  Even the Pats have a better record than the NFL lawyers.

    Mike
9.698VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDFrog Baseball Rooolz!!!!Wed Oct 27 1993 15:305
    	TTom, on this "Personal Seat License" deal, had Charlotte not been
    awarded a team would you have gotten your money back?  And how far in
    advance did you have to fork over the dough?
    
    				/Don
9.699METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 27 1993 15:333
/er see 142.19

The Crazy Met
9.700Beer makes the NFL go16421::HEISERvisualize whirled peasWed Oct 27 1993 15:502
    Busch Beer says the next team goes to St. Louis.  It's a matter of $
    and sponsorship, not fan support or investment support.
9.701a little bitHBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutWed Oct 27 1993 15:5415
Busch has to walk a bit of a line on this.

First of all, what's the threat? No more Bud commercials for NFL? No way.
They don't advertise on the NFL cause they lose money on these ads and
they don't do it to help out the NFL or anyone else but themselves.

Now, there is certainly a financial basis for the league to listen to
them. They're a major contributor to the success of the TV package. And
like other companies at other cities, they play a major financial role in
St. Louis.

But all of this seems to be irrelevant cause it sure looks like the fix
is in and St. Louis will be the 30th franchise.

TTom
9.702PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 27 1993 15:5417
9.70317318::DABLERIs it 1996 yet?Wed Oct 27 1993 16:2027
RE :                <<< Note 9.702 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>

>>	St. Louis is the largest television market in the United States
>>without an NFL team and is the home of Anheuser-Busch, a prime
>>advertiser for the league. There are questions, however, regarding fan
>>support in view of the Cardinals' move out of the city to Phoenix.

One of the biggest reasons that the Cardinals moved out of St. Louis is that 
Bidwell could not get the city and county here in St. Louis to build him a great
big domed stadium so the Cardinals could lose in a climate controlled atmosphere
rather than in Busch Stadium.  Fan support was relatively constant, drawing 
about 30k to 35k on average, with the occasional sell out with division rivals.

The fan support started dwindling when Bidwell started threatening to move the 
'Birds out of the area unless he got what he wanted.

That, and his reputation for not going after quality players and not giving his
coaches enough latitude to make decisions concerning recruiting.  Phoenix is 
getting a taste of Billy-boy now.  How do the folks in Phoenix feel about him?

The general feeling here is that St. Louis wants a football team.  I could care 
less, because I am simply tired of all the hoopla surrounding the expansion.  
But, if we get one here, the fans will turn out and support the team, so long as
the owners don't try to blackmail the city.

Jim()

9.704Pats are gone + next Farley AKOCOA::BREENWed Oct 27 1993 16:5024
    Looks like the ideal solution is 
    
    	Award #2 to Baltimore
    
    	Let Orthwein move pats to st loo
    
    	Boston will be told - build megaplex and you can have team upon
    completion
    
    	Owners of foxboro statium needing tennants will offer a great deal
    to BC thus solving eagles need for larger park
    
    One flaw is that there is a current patriot lease to 2000+ with foxboro
    stadium but I'm not sure how it can be enforced other than some
    arbitrator fixing a buyout sum.  But, of orthwein fled in the dark of
    night and then tried to play a game in (megaplex) massachusetts later
    there could be a problem if lease wasn't satisfactorily resolved.
    
    I say pats are gone and why am I not crying.
    
    ps - my 4yr old is Phillip Charles and royal flair seems popular. 
    Therefore, Kev, How about Fergie Farley
    
    mr helpful
9.705all a matter of moneyMETSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 27 1993 16:569
Orthwein could simply fulfill the terms of the lease and pay what the
stadium would take in from parking/concessions/etc. on game days. Add a clause
that if the stadium is rented out for something else on those days then
Orthwein, etc. would have to pay a smaller sum for that day.

I assume the Pats game is not sold out for this week; right? If thats the
case then do we get Jets-Giants up here?

The Crazy Met
9.70616421::HEISERvisualize whirled peasWed Oct 27 1993 17:2410
>That, and his reputation for not going after quality players and not giving his
>coaches enough latitude to make decisions concerning recruiting.  Phoenix is 
>getting a taste of Billy-boy now.  How do the folks in Phoenix feel about him?

    Jim, as far as I'm concerned, Bidwill is the only constant in the
    Cardinals pathetic history.  He's a loser and always will be.
    
>The general feeling here is that St. Louis wants a football team.  
    
    What a coincidence!  That's how Phoenicians feel too!
9.707MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Wed Oct 27 1993 17:516
    TCM,
    
    The Pats are on the road this weekend, so no Jets-Giants game
    on the tube in Boston.  
    
    Mike
9.708PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 27 1993 18:006
9.709NY Jets at NY Giants, 1 pmHBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutWed Oct 27 1993 18:060
9.710can't loose those Star Search rating pointsCNTROL::CHILDSthems that die are the lucky onesWed Oct 27 1993 18:2910
    
>    Who is the home team, Jets or Giants?  If it's the Jets, the game may
>    very well be broadcast on Boston's CBS affiliate, Channel 7.  The Pats
>    game will be carried on the NBC affiliate, Channel 4.


 better chance of seeing pigs fly. Channel 7 will not broadcast a game 
 against a showing of the patriots on channel 4. 

 mike
9.711PFSVAX::JACOBWolf, Wolf, Wolf...Wed Oct 27 1993 18:578
    Hey, when the Jests play the Giants at the Meadowlands, who gets to use
    the seats, the Giants season ticket holders?????
    
    Do the Jests fans get shut out, even though their team is playing in
    their home stadium, but as the away team???
    
    JaKe
    
9.712Giants home team=Jints season tix holdaCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Oct 27 1993 18:598
    Hey JaKe,
    
    Take it to the Just ask JaKe note, whar you cain answer yo' own
    question..
    
    MikeL
    
    
9.713PFSVAX::JACOBWolf, Wolf, Wolf...Wed Oct 27 1993 19:046
    MikeL
    
    Go do yerself!!
    
    JaKe
    
9.714PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 27 1993 19:086
9.715METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 27 1993 19:306
Since the Jets are the road team, game would have been on NBC. SInce
the Pats are on the road (against whom) they automatically get shown
in their home market. I also seem to recall that the NFL rules prevent
a competing game when the home team is on.

The Crazy Met
9.716BTW, Pats play ColtsPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 27 1993 19:504
9.717Baltimore might sueHBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutThu Oct 28 1993 12:3224
Turns out the threatened lawsuits between the 2 parties trying to land
the NFL franchise for St. Louis aren't the only ones looking at possible
legal action.

The word we're getting here is that when the presentations were made to
the owners, one requirement for consideration is that the groups had to
show letters of credit for $20 mil. 2 franchise hopefuls actually brought
money: Charlotte and one of the Baltimore groups. I couldn't catch the
guys full name but they kept refering to him as "Boogie". Well ol'
Boogie, like Jerry Richardson, showed up with his money and he feels like
the NFL changed the rules then and there cause they had already decided
to award the franchise to St. Louis, whichever group. So Boogie claims
that they couldn't since niether group brought the necessary money with
them.

So far we have St. Louis threatening to sue St. Louis and Memphis and
at least one of the Baltimores looking into suing the NFL.

This morning, Tagliabue (sp?) defended the league saying no decision has
been made on which group or city will get the franchise. Like what else
is he gonna say. In any case, Charlotte has a_NFL franchise and, for the
rest of the participants, it might be time to call in the lawyers.

TTom
9.718More on the expansionPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 28 1993 12:5384
   clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Oct 26/27, 1993:

--------
Subject: NFL adds Charlotte, holds off on naming other franchise
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 93 21:56:44 PDT
 
	ROSEMONT, Ill. (UPI) -- NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue announced
Tuesday that Charlotte, N.C., would receive one of the two new NFL
franchises, but delayed until Nov. 30 the naming of the second team to
join the league.
	Tagliabue said that the franchise from North Carolina had been
selected unanimously by owners, but that the league would wait until an
owners' meeting on Nov. 30 to name the NFL's 30th team.
	``The meeting is not to be delayed beyond that date and not to be
adjourned until the franchise is selected,'' Taglibue said.
	The commissioner said there will be no further presentations by the
cities of Baltimore, St. Louis, Jacksonvile, Fla., and Memphis, Tenn.,
when the owners meet. He also said the reason for the delay in naming
the second franchise was because owners were unable to reach a consensus
at over seven hours of meetings Tuesday.
	Charlotte's team will be called the Panthers and will begin play
along with the other expansion club in the 1995. The chief investor is
former NFL player Jerry Richardson, who heads the highly successful
Flagstar Companies food service chain that includes Denny's restaraunts.
Charlotte investors plan a 72,000-seat stadium.
	``This is a dream come true for me and my partners and especially a
dream come true for 10 million people in the Carolinas who have been
with us every step of the way,'' Richardson told Tagliabue. 
	Richardson said he thought his bid was successful because he and his
investors ``met every challenge the NFL put before us.'' 
	The announcement was greeted by fireworks and celebration at a rally
in downtown Charlotte. A parade will be held Friday to celebrate
Tuesday's decision. 
	Richardson unveiled the Panthers' new helmet and jersey, featuring
the team's black, blue and silver color scheme. The team will play the
1995 season at Clemson University's Memorial Stadium in Clemson, South
Carolina, before moving into its own facility in 1996. 
	A number of NFL owners had expressed an interest in getting the
league into the fertile Carolinas market and create regional rivalries
with Atlanta, the Florida clubs and Washington.
	Many have intimated that without the success of Charlotte's National
Basketball Association team, the Hornets, the NFL probably would not
have come to North Carolina.
	The Hornets proved a medium-sized market can have a major impact in
professional sports by leading the NBA in attendance four of it's five-
year history.
	``Obviously, we were a big factor in them getting an NFL franchise,''
Hornet's owner George Shinn said of the group headed by former Baltimore
Colts receiver Jerry Richardson.
	``But I don't think the Hornets can take any credit, the ones who
take the credit are the fans,'' Shinn added. ``What they did in buying
the tickets for the Hornets was terrific and what they did in buying
them for the NFL franchise is terrific. As a result, the rest of this
country will realize what a great market we have.''
	According to sports agent David Falk, who has represented among
others Michael Jordan of the Chicago Bulls, the economic impact
Charlotte will enjoy with an NFL team is enormous.
	``If Michael Jordan is worth $1 billion to the city of Chicago, then
the NFL should be worth hundreds of millions to Charlotte,'' Falk said.
``Half a billion dollars would be a conservative estimate to what an NFL
team is worth to this community.''
	Owners began meeting at 2 p.m. EDT and listened to six 15-minute
presentations from the five finalist cities. 
	An announcement had been expected at around 6 p.m., but three hours
after that deadline had passed one had not been made.
	Early in the evening, the expansion committee made up of NFL owners
emerged from its own meeting and presented suggestions to the remaining
owners. The owners held futher discussions and then voted to make
Chalotte the 29th franchise to join the 71-year old league.
	The committee reportedly suggested the owners gather more information
on the potential owner partnerships of the expansion franchises,
specifically St. Louis'. The bid by the group from St. Louis was sent
into disarray Monday when general partner Jerry Clinton pulled out and
real estate tycoon Stan Kroenke assumed responsibilities as the main
owner.
	The two new clubs will pay close to $150 million each to join the NFL
for the 1995 season and expand the NFL to 30 teams.
	Also on the owners' agenda this week is the selection of Super Bowl
sites for the January, 1997, and January, 1998. New Orleans, San Diego
and Tampa Bay are in the running for the 1997 game and San Diego, Tampa
Bay and Los Angeles are bidding for the 1998 title game. The four cities
competing to host the Super Bowls have been the site for 17 of the 27
championship games. 
9.719VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWe Want Zolak!Thu Oct 28 1993 14:1014
	Kraft and Karp hold a lease to Foxboro Stadium that says that the 
Patriots will play their home games there until sometime early in the next 
century.  The case will not be solved by an arbitrator (unless you mean a 
judge) and when Kraft and Karp get their settlement they can book anything 
they want for any day of the week, including Sundays when the Patriots play 
in their "new" home stadium.  There could be an out of court settlement, 
but the NFL will not "arbitrate" in this case because it's cut and dry, 
Kraft and Karp have a legal document.  My personal feeling is that if the 
only way the Pats will stay in New England, is if they get a tax funded 
SissyPlex somewhere in traffic infested Boston, located smack dab in the 
middle of a shopping mall so no tailgating will be allowed, then meet me in 
St. Louis (or Baltimore, or Jacksonville or Memphis...).

				/Don       
9.720The scenario goes on ...AKOCOA::BREENThu Oct 28 1993 14:4616
    My main point was that other than the nfl the only thing holding pats
    to boston area was that lease.  I am curious as to how strong a hold
    that is.
    
    I would guess that it's not so strong after all and my scenario is
    about to enfold
    
    and don, perhaps tailgating can be done at city point with a shuttle
    back and force to the south sta. 'plex
    
    and we'll have the memphis pats and the ny gints to choose from on tv
    
    unless flutie buys a cfl team and moves it here to play last 3-5 years
    of his career in boston to fill the gap while no nfl team is in boston.
    
    Hartford is the big loser in his scenario
9.721VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWe Want Zolak!Thu Oct 28 1993 15:037
    	As long as Kraft and Karp get their dough they could care less if
    New England has a team.  Just the thought of tailgating with the
    baseball/soccer types who would populate the SissyPlex is enough to
    make me turn in my season tickets and take up a new more exciting fall
    hobby, like leaf peeping.
    
    				/Don
9.722DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Thu Oct 28 1993 15:575
    	J'ville folks on CNN last night saying, "We want to know now,
    	we want to get on with our lives, etc." I agree. Why the wait,
    	for crying out loud?
    
    	Scott
9.723PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 28 1993 16:1311
9.724METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Oct 28 1993 17:583
but nonetheless it is only money,

The Crazy Met
9.726VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWe Want Zolak!Thu Oct 28 1993 19:156
    	I would think that the sweetheart stadium deal that the new St.
    Louis Pats would have could ease the pain of paying Kraft and Karp and
    that after a couple of "tough" years they would be rolling in the dough 
    (providing the good people of Missouri would support *this* team).
    
    				/Don
9.727Who sez we didn't support the Cards?17318::DABLERIs it 1996 yet?Thu Oct 28 1993 19:339
RE : <<< Note 9.726 by VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD "We Want Zolak!" >>
>>    (providing the good people of Missouri would support *this* team).
				    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>    				/Don

And who sez we didn't support the old one?  WE supported the team; it was the
owner we didn't care for.

Jim()
9.728METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Oct 28 1993 19:383
30-35K fans a game is hardly support.

The Crazy Met
9.729VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWe Want Zolak!Thu Oct 28 1993 19:393
    	I guess I misinterpret support to mean a full stadium.
    
    				/Don
9.730So what's 20K betwixt friends?17318::DABLERIs it 1996 yet?Thu Oct 28 1993 20:2118
RE : <<< Note 9.729 by VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD "We Want Zolak!" >>>

>>    	I guess I misinterpret support to mean a full stadium.
    
    				/Don


Yer prolly right.  I ain't much of a football fan and I really could care less
if'n StL gets a team or not.  I'm tired of the hoopla.  

Besides, this is primarily a baseball town.  Who needs football? :-)

Jim()

ps - When yer stadium only holds just upwards of 53K, 35K looks pretty good - 
if'n ya don't look at the empty seats...


9.731CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childFri Oct 29 1993 11:5110
 Cmon /er you ain't that young that you can't remember full house back when
 Hart and co. had them battling for the division. They're in the best division
 in football for rivalries. I don't know of any other division in any sport
 where the fans and teams of the division depise one another. You  know
 "my favorite team is the Giants and anyone who's playing dallas,washington,
 philly, or cards and if they're playing one another let it be called cause
 they don't have enough players to finish the game.......


9.732And I love you too Chappy... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 29 1993 12:1814
    
> I don't know of any other division in any sport
> where the fans and teams of the division depise one another.
    
    Try the AL East, where the mother of all pro sports rivalries in
    Yankees-Red Sox still lives on.  Fortunately, one thing that was
    preserved in baseball's realignment was this one remaining monster
    division (in terms of traditional rivalries).  There is no love lost 
    between Red Sox fans and the Yankees, Blue Jays, Orioles, and even 
    Indians as this file itself has demonstrated many times.
    
    glenn
    
                                              
9.733CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childFri Oct 29 1993 12:2918
    
>    Try the AL East, where the mother of all pro sports rivalries in
>    Yankees-Red Sox still lives on.  Fortunately, one thing that was
>    preserved in baseball's realignment was this one remaining monster
>    division (in terms of traditional rivalries).  There is no love lost 
>    between Red Sox fans and the Yankees, Blue Jays, Orioles, and even 
>    Indians as this file itself has demonstrated many times.
    
 
 Does anyone else believe this? I'll give you the Soxs/Yankee or in
 fact Anybody/Yanks but Soxs fans generally like the Birds and certainly
 have more feelings of compansion that hatred for the Indians.....

 mike
    
                                              


9.734A lot of it is cyclical based on success, but it's there...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 29 1993 12:4618
    
> Does anyone else believe this? I'll give you the Soxs/Yankee or in
> fact Anybody/Yanks but Soxs fans generally like the Birds and certainly
> have more feelings of compansion that hatred for the Indians.....
    
    Yeah, I'll give you the Orioles who are just too lovable these days
    (but not when Earl Weaver was in charge and kept racing past the
    collapsing Bosox every September), but then again I don't think there 
    was any great hatred for the St. Louis Cardinals even in the Jim Hart 
    days.  I lived near DC in those days and with the Redskins fans it was 
    all Cowboys, Cowboys, Cowboys.  No one gave a damn about the Cards 
    even when they were winning (including the one year they edged the 
    Skins for the playoffs on the phantom endzone reception the hatred was 
    reserved for da refs), or the pathetic Jints or Iggles for that matter 
    at that time...
    
    glenn
    
9.735More on the owners meetingPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 29 1993 12:5142
   clarinews@clarinet.com articles by 27 Oct 93:

Subject: CHICAGO (UI) -- National Football League owners will meet again Nov. 30 to award a second expansion franchise.
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 93 11:41:14 PDT
 
	Charlotte, N.C., was awarded an expansion team Tuesday night by a
unanimous vote of NFL owners in Rosemont, Ill. However, NFL Commissioner
Paul Tagliabue said neither the 12-member joint expansion and finance
committee or the owners could agree on a second expansion city.
	Tagliabue said the next meeting ``will not be adjourned until the
second franchise is selected.''
	The four remaining cities under consideration are St. Louis,
Baltimore, Jacksonville and Memphis.
	Charlotte's team will be called the Carolina Panthers. The chief
investor is former NFL player Jerry Richardson, who heads the highly
successful Flagstar Companies food service chain. Charlotte investors
plan to build a 72,000-seat stadium.
	Tagliabue said the decision to award a franchise to Charlotte was
based on the market, fan support, the proposed stadium and the quality
of the ownership group. The NFL's expansion committee unanimously
recommended Charlotte to the full ownership and the owners unanimously
ratified that recommendation.
	The announcement was greeted by fireworks and celebration at a rally
in downtown Charlotte. A parade will be held Friday to celebrate the
city's expansion franchise.
	Richardson unveiled the Panthers' new helmet and jersey, featuring
the team's black, blue and silver color scheme. The team will play the
1995 season at Clemson University's Memorial Stadium in Clemson, S.C.,
before moving into its own facility in 1996.
	The St. Louis bid was complicated by the emergence of a second
ownership group headed by Fran Murray.
	James Orthwein, who owns the New England Patriots, had been a partner
in the first ownership group but recently reduced his role to limited
partner. The head of the investment group had been Jerry Clinton, but
Monday withdrew Monday and Stanley Kroenke has taken over the leadership
of the St. Louis entry. 
	Also on the owners' agenda this week is the selection of Super Bowl
sites for the January 1997, and January 1998 championship games. New
Orleans, San Diego and Tampa Bay are in the running for the 1997 game,
while San Diego, Tampa Bay and Los Angeles are bidding for the 1998
title game.
9.736VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDAu revoir NAFTAFri Oct 29 1993 12:5712
    	You're right MikeC, I ain't that young.  But saying that St. Louis
    supported the Cardinals because *when* then were division contenders
    they filled the stadium is like saying New England supports the Pats
    because for a couple of years after the Super Bowl ride they filled 
    Shaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium.  Neither washes when compared to the
    Midgets or 'Skins, but they really pale in comparison to Seattle, who
    for the first time since 1977 didn't sell out their stadium 72 hours in
    advance of the game last Sunday.  Given the lack of competitive teams
    Seattle has had that's damn good fan support.  If New England loses the
    Patriots the real reason will be lack of fan support.
    
    				/Don
9.737PTOVAX::JACOBLet mine be a voice for peaceFri Oct 29 1993 13:3429
    
> I don't know of any other division in any sport
> where the fans and teams of the division depise one another.
    
    WEll, in the AFC CEntral, the two annual meeting between the STEELERS
    and the scum from Clevescum are referred to as the "Back Yard Brawls",
    the people of Pittsburgh DESPISE the Clevescum fans, and visa versa.
    
    It's gone as far as if the STEELERS are playing in Clevescum, ya don't
    get a motel room anywhere within 50 miles of Clevescum cause the Pa.
    plates give ya away and yer tires usually end up slashed or yer
    windshield broke or something like that.  Plus, the teams have never
    been fond of each other, either.
    
    Now, Houscum, with their wussy Baby Blue colors, we fans here in
    Pittsburgh hate them too, just they ain't geographically close enuf to
    inflict anything on.
    
    The Bungholes, on the other hand,are so pathetic in recent years, I may
    just feel some pity for them
    
    
    NOT!!!!!!
    
    And these views are just about standard among STEELER fans.
    
    JaKe
    
    
9.738NBC may not show NFL nexted yearHBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutFri Oct 29 1993 14:0613
Just as the NFL is actually starting its expansion, NBC is threatening to
quit showing it on TV.

NBC pres Dick Ebersol claims the network is going to lose over 80 mil
this year which is the final year of their contract. Ebersol says that
the NFL demands are excessive in terms of revenue requests and unless the
league changes its tune, NBC is outta here.

Ebersol goes on further to claim that the future of NFL on TV is with
cable. ESPN and TNT already show some games and he expects someone on
cable to pick up the games if'n NBC bows out.

TTom
9.739METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Oct 29 1993 14:275
US Congress will get into the act very quickly if all those games 
are moved to cable. with TNT and ESPN there is a free channel in
the home markets that also shows those games.

The Crazy Met
9.740PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 29 1993 14:495
9.741headed for troubleHBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutFri Oct 29 1993 14:5316
Crazy,

Among the issues involved is that the local stations are being kept from
broadcasting local sports if'n they're also a superstation. WGH is suing
the NBA right now over a decision to limit the number of Bulls games that
WGN can show. 

For NFL, it's even more restrictive than that. The games can only be
shown on the major networks, ESPN, and TNT. No body else can broadcast
the games at all.

The other wrinkle for the NFL is that the revenue is shared between the
various teams across a wide variety of markets. Seattle gets the same
share as Philadelphia.

TTom
9.742METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Oct 29 1993 15:068
Congress could take away the NFL's limited anti-trust exemption to
negotiate a TV contract and cause it a lot of trouble. Congress could also
try to do things based on the Commerce clause of the constitution - interstate
commerce is governed by the feds; NFL could be construed as interstate
commerce. In other words Congress has many ways that they could make
life miserable for the NFL if they chose to.

The Crazy Met
9.743TV is the issueHBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutFri Oct 29 1993 15:1814
The problem with the anti-trust issues is that one must prove that the
feds have the final say or else it defaults to the states (locals).

As for cable, I know that the local college sports would love to see NFL
leave the networks. In the case of the Panthers, the ACC is already
singing the blues about how they're gonna lose exposure to the NFL. A
college conference can sign a_individual pact with any TV entity. It
doesn't even have to be a TV station or network as in the case with
Raycom Sports, who deals with individual stations for air time.

This whole issue should be turned over to free enterprise and let the
market rule. Where's Rush when you need him?

TTom
9.744METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Oct 29 1993 15:2916
TTom,

A number of years ago College Football was sold to TV as a package 
deal. Some schools sued claiming that not being able to sell their games
because the NCAA wanted to sell as a package was a violation of anti-trust
rules. The courts agreed and now there is lots of college football broadcast
each weekend. This leads me to believe that if the NFL lost the limited
anti-trust exemption that it has been given by Congress to negotiate a
league-wide TV contract, teams could then sell their games to local
stations. Feds likely have the final say on this kind of anti-trust
because it clearly crosses state lines - if not why would the NFL need
congress to give it a limited anti-trust exemption??

btw: this is not a note on pro/con of allowing PPV/cable.

The Crazy Met
9.745broadcast the fallHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Oct 29 1993 15:3516
>btw: this is not a note on pro/con of allowing PPV/cable.

Ditto.

One of the problems with sports in general is the proliferation of the
games on TV. NBA viewing on a per game basis is down significantly. Sure
everyone watched the marquee games but when Michael and Charles aren't on
the viewing population dwindles rapidly. And now there aint no Michael.

The CFA was formed in a large part to let the schools handle the TV
situation themselves. Not only did they not want TV or the Feds to
control what they wanted, they were even unwillling to leave it to the
NCAA. Like a lot of business decisions being made now, the CFA didn't
want the overhead of the NCAA.

TTom
9.746METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Oct 29 1993 15:419
MLB is also complaining about so many games available. On given nights I can
switch between 4 baseball games on at the same time (WWOR, TBS, WSBK, ESPN).

re: CFA

The irony of this was that the ratings went down because so many games
were now available and the revenue per school went down.

The Crazy Met
9.747NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 29 1993 15:5610
    Plenty okay with me if we continue to see TV revenues crash into the
    basement for all sports.  With growing technology the games will still 
    be on in some form or another for those that must see them on the tube 
    (even if at a price), and some perspective can then be returned to 
    these events.  TV influences sporting events far too much already at 
    the expense of the in-person paying spectator...
    
    glenn
        
9.748QUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Fri Oct 29 1993 16:244
      I haven't seen the Panthers uni's.  Are they black jerseys with
    outlines of teal & silver?
    
      Tim
9.749ain't no tealHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Oct 29 1993 16:2915
Firsted of all, let's put that "teal" stuff to rest. The blue is
a_electric royal very different from Hornets teyp teal, Carolina type
baby blue, or Duke type reg'lar blue.

The pants are black with curved, not straight, said same blue and silver
stripes with a little peedee panther. At home the jersey's are Panther
Blue (I guess) with black, white and silver trim. For away, switch white
and blue. Jersey's also have a peedee panther. The helmet is silver with
the black panther.

Evidently the league really liked the idea of black pants. I mean if'n
the fix was in for Charlotte it's nice the league has something
substantial to base it on like color of pants.

TTom
9.750PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 29 1993 17:301
    What's a "peedee panther"?
9.751diminutiveHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Oct 29 1993 17:413
You know like little peedee wheatstraw?\

TTom
9.752PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 29 1993 17:494
9.753bothHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Oct 29 1993 17:5910
Actually, it's both a local thang and a_ethnic thing.

There's a comic that I've seen on the cables who's Italian and talks
about his family in such terms: Joey bag of doughnuts, Little Peedee
wheatstraw, etc.; He goes on but those are 2 that I remember.

Then there's the Peedee Rivers, Great and Little. In the movie "Wild at
Heart" Nicholas Cage pulls time at the Peedee River "facility".

TTom
9.754Anybody wanna take Murray off'n our hands?17318::DABLERIs it 1996 yet?Wed Nov 03 1993 13:5613
Latest word I heard on the last expansion team was that the owners may be moving
the Nov. 30 meeting up to the 18th and that if Fran Murray was still in the 
picture, St. Louis was NOT going to get the team.  Here's a guy who spends 
zillions of hours and dollars working to get a team brought to this city and now
is going to screw it all up by being a dork!

I don't  get it.  and neither will St. Louis.  But, I really don't care, 'cause
it's only 5 and a half months 'til spring training...

Jim()

ps - I also heard that Murray is gonna try to get control of the Blues... Geez,
I hope this guy moves....
9.755BarfQUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Wed Nov 03 1993 13:581
      Just what the NFL needs,  more black and silver.......
9.756AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSWed Nov 03 1993 14:338
    Does anyone know if the Patriots-Bills game will be televised in the
    Worcester area ?  Sure hope not.  
    
    The Cowboys-Giants game will be on CBS at the same time but will not be 
    shown if the Patriots' game is on the tube. Something to do with NFL
    rules...
    
    John "D Cowboys" r.
9.757PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Nov 03 1993 14:4713
9.758AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSWed Nov 03 1993 14:579
    Keith, it seems that if the home team is on TV the competing channel
    can not televise another game.  I sure hope I'm wrong on this because
    the Cowboys-Giants game looks to be a good one.
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
    
    P.S.  Anyone know what the call letters are for Channel 7 out of 
    Boston ?  I think I might give them a call to see what they will
    show this Sunday. 
9.759METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Nov 03 1993 14:593
7 in Boston: WHDH

The Crazy Met
9.760USCTR1::KINGLook, I can hear what you are thinking.....Wed Nov 03 1993 15:054
    Re: Murray He has stated that if ST Louis gets the nod from the NFL and
    he is not a part of the ownership then he will sue the NFL...
    
    REK
9.762AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSWed Nov 03 1993 15:127
    #$%^$%#$$#%#%$##% !!!!!
    
    I hate this place !!!  Channel 7 will not show the Cowboys-Giants game
    at 1:00 since the Patriots-Bills game will be shown.  Great, now we get
    to watch a wannabe-football team get plastered by the Bills.
    
    John "D Cowboys" r.
9.763METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Nov 03 1993 15:375
re: .762

join the crowd.

The Crazy Met
9.764Saw change the name to Zambo and port it over please ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childWed Nov 03 1993 15:5914
John, in the worcester area if you can put rabbit ears or connect an antenna
to your TV, you should be able to pick up CBS Station channel 6 out of
Providence which will have the Giants/Sowboys on. I live in worcester
and have done this on numerous occassions. The Giants vs Sowboys game
is a joke with a 10 point line. Unfortunately the Cowgirls will expose
the Giants's inflated record against bad teams and the supposed "genuis"
of GT Danny Reeves.....

 Dallas 35
 NYG    10

mike

9.765USCTR1::KINGLook, I can hear what you are thinking.....Wed Nov 03 1993 16:034
    Yep, thats me on top. I call it skill.... My friends (all 2 of them)
    call it sh*t luck.... :-}
    
    REK
9.766METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Nov 03 1993 16:045
> My friends (all 2 of them)

and one of 'em is REK's pet dog.

The Crazy Met
9.767I believe someone mentioned a solution to this problem, TCMNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Nov 03 1993 16:068
    
> join the crowd.
    
    Yeah, only a city as provincial as Boston would actually follow NFL
    rules and put on the games that feature their own team...
    
    glenn
    
9.769METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Nov 03 1993 16:135
Clearly for NBC to have the Pats on in Boston is goodness so the following
question is really hypothetical in nature. If a game is sold out does the local
affiliate HAVE to carry that game or is it simply allowed to carry the game??

The Crazy Met
9.770Go Pats!16421::HEISERvisualize whirled peasWed Nov 03 1993 16:141
    We have the same problem: a job with no team.
9.771DECWET::METZGERAsk me if I care.Wed Nov 03 1993 16:1710
Call around to a few bars. There's got to be enough of America's team fans out
there to convince some bar to pick it up on a dish instead of showing the
patsies...

Or listen to the game on the radio freeing up your body to do more interesting
things....

Metz

9.772Let the market talkAKOCOA::BREENWed Nov 03 1993 16:4213
    I suppose the networks or affiliates do have to follow the rules but I
    recall a few years back when cable systems chose not to but now there
    are watchdogs and fines 
    
    And I suppose there have to be rules but I'd like to see cable/nfl tv
    rules headcount chopping - perhaps some ex deccie would volunteer to
    reduce all tv rules by 1/2
    
    But finally, who in blazes makes these rules and why; simply put the
    games on and let the market prevail.  Red Auerbach used to have rules
    that said "don't give away the product, make em pay" and everyone
    bewailed poor celtic attendance and then nba hired professionals to
    market the product via tv of all things and ... there I go again
9.773Keep it in the Family....CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Nov 03 1993 16:466
>    
>    And I suppose there have to be rules but I'd like to see cable/nfl tv
>    rules headcount chopping - perhaps some ex deccie would volunteer to
>    reduce all tv rules by 1/2
    
Maybe Don Palmer could appoint a new Capo to do that......
9.774METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Nov 03 1993 17:289
re: .772

At least in this case allowing the market to rule  would not have "helped" 
in getting the NY-Dallas game on the tube.
Ratings for sports in Boston is generally good when a local team is playing;
when there in no local team the Boston market tends to be the lowest rated
major TV market for that event.

Tha Crazy Met
9.775PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Nov 03 1993 17:409
9.776sheesh!METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Nov 03 1993 17:454
Mac, you didn't answer the question. Sure the local team is likely to garner
higher ratings; the question was on the rule not the business decision.

The Crazy Met
9.777PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Nov 03 1993 18:056
9.778Reading Comprehension 101 should helpMETSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Nov 03 1993 18:199
> Clearly for NBC to have the Pats on in Boston is goodness so the following
> question is really hypothetical in nature.

we agree on this point Mac. 

That is why the question is hypothetical. I'm wondering what the NFL rules
are on something like this.

The Crazy Met
9.779Waisted disk spaceQUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Wed Nov 03 1993 21:105
      All this talk concerning a game that the score should be mailed in? 
    I would love to see the Pats beat 'em,  but I guess I will have to wait
    until next year...
    
      Tim
9.780duh?CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childThu Nov 04 1993 10:576
 Well with all the revenue sharing the NFL and networks do it makes alot of
 sense to have the rule. That way you can insure local advertiser to buy
 buy buy commerical time....

 mike
9.781METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 04 1993 13:123
last I heard there was no revenue sharing between the NFL and the networks.

The Crazy Met
9.782TV and propertiesHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 04 1993 13:369
The current TV money is shared as is NFL properties. Any and all local
money is kept by the franchise.

As a sidelight to this issue, the league made the new franchises agree to
not getting into this money for the first couple of years. No TV money
and no paraphenalia money. The Carolina Panthers don't get a dime for all
them T-Shirts being sold.

TTom
9.783TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Thu Nov 04 1993 13:419
9.784PSLs the issueHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 04 1993 13:5318
Actually, there is a minor issue with the Panthers making money. They've
pretty much signed away everything for the first couple of years. Then
they went and upped the ante for how much they pay the visiting team.
They're now gonna be paying more than any othre franchise. And the lasted
straw is the the players union, who have to agree on everything, is
making noises about not liking the way PSLs work. The Personal Seat
Licenses were pulled out of the shared kitty during the negotiations with
the league and the players union is talking like they wanna get in on the
$100+ mil that's being raised.

The PSL money is really not anything net, except the interest they get
between now and when they actually have to shell out some bucks to start
the stadium construction. 

And we settled the issue of these "expensive" season tickets which they
aint.

TTom
9.785PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 04 1993 14:147
9.786don't need a lifetimeHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 04 1993 14:2111
>    Only if you're either buying the line about the PSL being an investment

There's no belief system required. I'm paying 2700 bucks for my PSL. It
will never be worth less that 2700 bucks. In fact, in January its value
increases because the price of the remaining PSLs increases by 10%.
Shortly thereafter, there will be no PSLs available. At that time, I'll
be able to sell my PSL for a 10% profit.

No tell me again how this isn't a_investment?

TTom
9.787The team won't be able to perpetually flounder; big $ at stake...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Nov 04 1993 18:5331
    
> No tell me again how this isn't a_investment?
    
    I have my doubts that a PSL that costs 5+ years worth of season
    tickets will steadily appreciate in value over the long term.  Maybe it
    will, and maybe it won't, but undoubtedly it'll depend on the quality
    of the team on the playing field.  The franchise *is* taking some risk 
    in guaranteeing the initial purchase price of these things.  Look at 
    what's happened with other unsuccessful franchises like Tampa Bay, 
    Indianapolis, Phoenix and New England.  What do you think would happen 
    if the regular season-ticket holders of these teams were right now given 
    the choice between the right to renew for the next year or $2700 cash put
    back in their hands?  There'd be a run on the bank, and the teams would
    have to start from scratch in re-selling their season tickets without
    the initial investment in a license.  In fact, in these cities you
    literally couldn't pay enough people to take such a license that 
    obligates them to by a season's pass...
    
    It's a unique and interesting approach that Carolina has taken.  It
    gives them a very real incentive to be successful, and the specter of
    60,000+ PSLs hanging over the team's head might also serve to keep the 
    season ticket prices at a below-market level if the team still struggles
    after the first few years.  Then again, perhaps I've underestimated how 
    well the Carolinas would support this team if it's not successful (as so 
    many expansion franchises have not been).  I suspect that aside from the
    great season here or there that the team will never generally be as
    immensely popular as it is right now.  That's just the way it is with
    new things...
    
    glenn
    
9.788METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 04 1993 19:044
Any accountant types out there? Would PSL's go on the books as Liabilities -
similar to the way airlines need to account for frequent flier miles??

The Crazy Met
9.789Hope this helps!BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredThu Nov 04 1993 19:097
               <<< Note 9.788 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94" >>>

>Any accountant types out there? 

	Yes

	Kevin
9.790we shall seeHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 04 1993 19:1226
Right now, the PSL investor is assured of not losing any money. 

As for your question, most of us who are looking for any immediate return
would want to wait until the last of the PSLs go on sale in January at
which time you're likely to get $2970 (2700 + 270).

Certainly, if the Panthers do their best imitation of the current Rams or
Pats it might change the nature of this investment. There is no guarantee
that the PSL price support subsidy will be in place forever although we
have it in writing at this time.

Now to totally lose the investment, there has to be no demand whatsoever
for tickets. As long as there are people interested in season tickets, at
all, it won't become worthless. The Panthers are making it very clear
that you gotta have a PSL to get season tickets.

So any way you slice and dice it, it's a_investment even though it
certainly could be argued that it might, under the wrong circumstances,
not be that smart or profitable.

The one who's kicking himself right now about PSLs is George Shinn, the
Hornets owner. If'n he had thought of this, there's no way he
wouldn't've done it. As it is, I have Hornets season tickets rights
without any PSL - no investment - and that's worth 2-3K right now.

TTom
9.791PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 04 1993 19:397
    Bottom line is cost.  You can get a season ticket to the Patriots at
    $28/seat/game.  To get a Panther season ticket you have to shell out
    $2700 plus a per seat, per game price.  Whose tickets are more
    expensive?
    
    Are most Caroliners buying PSLs as investments or as a way to buy
    season tickets?
9.792METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 04 1993 19:439
Bottom line is Return on Investment. You could argue that the investment 
would appreciate better elsewhere, on the other hand you are guaranteed not
to lose the principal.

Doesn't matter why they are buying the PSL; it is the underlying structure
that counts. I suspect PSL's in some form or other will appear on the Panthers
balance sheet.

The Crazy Met
9.793AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSThu Nov 04 1993 19:449
    OK !!!  I've got it all worked out.  There is a bar/restaurant in
    Sturbridge called "The Connection" that has promised to show the
    Cowboys-Giants game.
    
    This is not illegal as they catch the CBS station out of Conn.  I
    will be there if anyone is interested.
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
    
9.794S T H MtMPFSVAX::JACOBThe King returns!Thu Nov 04 1993 19:4510
    MAC,
    
    there's one difference,
    
    The Panthers will win a Super Bowl before the Patriot's do.
    
    (8^)
    
    JaKe
    
9.795METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 04 1993 19:465
re: .793

too far to get to.

The Crazy Met
9.796good old irish Folk MuisicCNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childThu Nov 04 1993 19:4720
 Maybe they folks in Carolina got extra moola for PSL cause they ain't got
 no form of regressive tax (lottery) to toss their money at....who cares
 TTom doesn't feel ripped off why should you guys????

 Speaking of Tossin'

 I heard this song this morning an Irish ballard about "Look what we've done
 to the mother-tougue" it was absolutely hilarious...

 it picked up certain slang terms and explain how that wasn't the way they
 were meant...

 "remember when a joint was a part of you body"
 "when smack was a thing you got form mommsy wommsy when you were badcee 
 wasdcee"

 "when Tossing off was thing Scot did with a Caber"...

 countless more I missed half cause I was laugh so hard....
9.797DECWET::METZGERAsk me if I care.Thu Nov 04 1993 19:5619
Actually it's more of a bond or a license than a pure investment. The team is
licensing the ticket buying rights to individuals.

My guess is that the PSL money will be seen as an escrow type money on the book
because they are guarenteeing a return of the $$ if you return your PSL. 

EIther way it's a Michael Milken wet dream because the franschise could go
belly up at any time and the PSL owners would be last in the line of creditors
to get the money back....essentially it's an interest free loan to the owners 
that they use to secure the franchise and stadium rights...

For PSL owners it's a deal if you intend to keep getting tickets in perpetuity
and they remain scarce (like Redskin or Giants tickets scarce) IF the team
flounders and the demand for tickets drops lower than capacity you aren;t 
going to make any money unloading your PSL and the club might pull some
shenanigans around their "guarentee" of refunding it.

Metz
9.798now down the road it could go sourHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 04 1993 19:5818
> TTom doesn't feel ripped off why should you guys????

That pretty much sums it up. 

Most people are buying PSLs cause it'll be the only way to get Panthers
tickets. Some are buying them as investments but they are in the distinct
minority.

I'll conceed the math that right now my "costs" are more than they would
be for say the Pats. But as soon as I sell, then my "costs" become less
cause for the PSL will increase in value in January.

The whole issue is that right now sports has a special place in
Charlotte. With the continued influx of people and money to this area
it's hard to imagine the PSL becoming worthless. The Hornets were pretty
bad for 3 or 4 years but you didn't notice it at the box office. 

TTom
9.799METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 04 1993 19:596
Making anything out of support for an expansion team is at best dubious. The
real test will be if the Hornets are very good for a number of years and
then are dismal for 3-4 years what happens in those 3-4 years.

The Crazy Met
9.800not a fixed pieHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 04 1993 20:0415
Add this to the mix, Crazy:

What if the Hornets go south and the Panthers really take off. The
Hornets tickets might not be worth anything which is what I spent to get
the rights to buy season tickets.

There is some concern around here for the Hornets who will no longer be
the only game in town. The local colleges are expressing concern about
their ability to stay in the limelight. The best thing going right now
for these concerns is the local economy which is expanding. Charlotte was
listed in either Fortune or Money as having the fastest growing economy
the last 10 years when measured in terms of new job growth. Some 200,000
new jobs have been added in Charlotte the last 10 years.

TTom
9.801CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childThu Nov 04 1993 20:097
Forget it TCM, as long as Zo' stays in Charlotte the team will be more
than just competitive......

if only they had gotten Rodman....

mike
9.802METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 04 1993 20:116
re: .801

true; forget about the specific numbers I used, it is the theory
that is interesting.

The Crazy Met
9.803a long time, hopefullyHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 04 1993 20:1310
Everyone should get used to Zo and LJ playing for Charlotte. The entire
fortunes of the team have come about cause of them two. LJ is signed for
approximately forever and nexted year the Hornets will provide Zo with
similar status.

Nexted year, they'll have about 3 mil per year to sign a free agent and
with the exemption given for signing the top pick the Hornets should
continue to improve.

TTom
9.804Nfl rejects Childress contract - more suits?AKOCOA::BREENThu Nov 04 1993 20:198
    Childress apparently has a "right of first refusal" clause in the new
    contract.
    
    I have to admire the nfl and its lawyers who are consistently ignoring
    the courtroom verdicts which deny them the monopoly status they covet.
    
    Childress can eventually sue just like silky sullivan for the differ on
    this and his eventual contract
9.805legal lovefestHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 04 1993 20:224
Hail, all of this is just warmup. Wait until nexted year when there's a
real cap. Then you'll see some serious litigations going on.

TTom
9.806LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesThu Nov 04 1993 20:4313
>                   <<< Note 9.792 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94"
>    >>>Bottom line is Return on Investment. You could argue that the
>    investment would appreciate better elsewhere, on the other hand you are
>    guaranteed notto lose the principal.
    
    There is no guarantee that you won't lose the principal.  What happens
    if after 3-4 years, they stop selling out?  The owners could either
    stop charging the PSL (that'd go over real well with the people who
    paid it), sell the team to another group who doesn't charge the PSL, or
    go bankrupt.  At that time, the PSL is worthless.  As long as you don't
    look at this thing as an investment, you're OK.
    
    brews
9.807MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Nov 04 1993 22:168
    
    It all depends on if the guarantee is part of a contract or verbla.
    
    I agree that folks don't think of it as an investment, but it IS more
    than an addition to the ticket price.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.808MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Nov 04 1993 22:166
    re: Childress
    
    what was the quirk in his contract?
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.809AKOCOA::BREENFri Nov 05 1993 12:394
    It wasn't completely explained something to do with right of first
    refusal.  I am guessing he signed somethinga akin to the nba dudley
    contract in which current or in childress case future cap
    considerations are being bypassed.
9.810Proud PSL ProprietorHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Nov 05 1993 13:0411
I don't look at my PSL as a_investment. I bought it cause it's the
onliest way to assure oneself of Panther tickets. They are going to sell
out.

However, I don't understand why one shouldn't look at it that way. Just
because the whole thing can go sour doesn't change anything. I invest in
one of them high growth funds and it's involved in oversea firms, highly
speculative, etc. It could go into the toilet but it's still
a_investment.

TTom
9.811LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesFri Nov 05 1993 13:3110
  >  It all depends on if the guarantee is part of a contract or verbla.    
    
    This has nothing to do with the security of the funds should the
    Panthers file chapter 11.
    
    Heard today that the NFL is not happy that the Panthers are trying to
    claim that some of their seats are luxury boxes when they really are
    not.  
    
    brews 
9.812club seatsHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Nov 05 1993 13:3715
Right you are Brews.

What the Panthers did was to invest a thing they called a club seat.
They made tickets available to the company that bought the luxury boxes.
These tickets surround the boxes. They're trying to say that this is part
of the box sales because that money is allowed to be kept by the home
team.

It's not just the NFL but this is also part of the concerns raised by the
players union.

This won't, however, be any type of roadblock to the team. It is, how you
say, merely a matter of money.

TTom
9.813Just another reason to beware; they may come for you next...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Nov 05 1993 14:1640
    
    I don't really care if a PSL is an investment or not nor whether
    individuals feel they are getting their money's worth, but I do hope
    that this concept of a "license that allows you to buy a license (your 
    ticket)" is one that doesn't spread.  Sure, instead of pocketing the
    longterm interest on some $100+M in up front capital, Carolina could 
    have just as easily calculated the price of the tickets alone on market 
    demand and started at $100/pop and have sold the place out without any 
    trouble.  It still doesn't make me feel any better that if a person has 
    any intention of going to a game or two with his spouse or kid (much 
    less a family) that he better have $5000 in cash up front or be forced 
    to deal with the hackers in the scalping aftermarket at hundreds per game.
    
    None of the shenanigans that have gone on with this latest NFL expansion 
    has changed my low opinion of monopolistic pro sports franchises
    and the king's ransoms they demand from a community to operate at their
    obscene profit levels.  If the Patriots continue to make related demands 
    with this ludicrous Mondo-plex proposal (not that the Patriots are in as
    strong a bargaining position as Carolina, but they still are the only
    game in town), I say let them go to St. Louis, Hartford, Memphis or
    wherever else the people are willing to put up with these absurdities.
    At some point even NFL football is just not worth the price.  
    
    With the kind of stadium subsidies, licenses, fees and whatnot that 
    we're talking about that now extend into the hundreds of millions of 
    dollars (all in order to cater to the affluent sports consumer), once
    again, I can't see where it wouldn't be more cost-effective to tell the 
    monopolistic franchises to stick their bribes and to have the state or
    local public groups buy the teams outright (now that the NFL has lost the
    Sullivan case the self-protection against this kind of ownership should 
    be removed).  The teams might not be well run but at least if you have 
    some small stake in the operation there's a possibility to get into a 
    game at a regular price in a regular seat at a regular stadium.  Do you 
    think the Packers would still be in that pocket of wealth known as Green 
    Bay WI if the team weren't community-owned?  The average Green Bay sports 
    fan saw the writing on the wall about 25 years ago and made a very 
    intelligent decision...  
    
    glenn
    
9.814money talksHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Nov 05 1993 14:2412
Glenn,

There's been a lot of complaints about the prices.

If you look at what is required for the seats that I have, I will have
spent 4500 bucks the first 3 seasons, which given that they make you buy
10 tickets - 2 preseason, 8 regular - that works out to a cool $150 just
to get into the place. There's a lot of folks who aren't going to be
either able or willing to do that. The math for the first season's 10
tickets is even worse.

TTom
9.815MKFSA::LONGa foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mindFri Nov 05 1993 14:2816
	Whoaa there Glenn!  Wait one socialistic minute!  Do the words
	"free enterprise" mean anything to you?  If enough people stop
	purchasing an item the seller will either adjust his price or
	go out of business.

	"Have the state purchase the team" - Are you nuts?  Name one thing 
	that any government agency has taken over and not caused to turn
	into crapola.

	Remember, if you don't like a product don't buy it.  Don't ask the 
	government to regulate the price so "everyone will have an equal
	chance to buy it."

	Phew, I feel better now.

	billl
9.816LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesFri Nov 05 1993 14:423
    
    And look how well the Packers have done since they were purchased by
    "the state."  8^)
9.817Free? Since when? (No, I'm not nuts...)NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Nov 05 1993 14:4324
    >	Whoaa there Glenn!  Wait one socialistic minute!  Do the words
    >	"free enterprise" mean anything to you?  If enough people stop
    >	purchasing an item the seller will either adjust his price or
    >	go out of business.
    >
    >	"Have the state purchase the team" - Are you nuts?  Name one thing 
    >	that any government agency has taken over and not caused to turn
    >	into crapola.
    
    Fine, then no tax money for a Megaplex.  No more rent-free deals.  No
    more gifts of land.  The state can't be trusted in their negotiations 
    of these matters (besides, who do *you* really think is benefiting from 
    these deals?).  Let the market sort it out.  *That's* free enterprise.
    
    Besides, one of the solutions I gave was local public ownership.  Sale 
    of shares of stock.  Far as I know, that concept also falls under free 
    enterprise.  Whoops, prohibited by NFL rules.  Whoops, implemented 
    once already by the Patriots before the NFL/Sullivan team changed the
    rules and colluded to rip off the stockholders (proved in court).  Hey, 
    that NFL is just one great shining example of free enterprise in action...
    
    glenn
    
9.818Free Enterprise vs Socialism not simple arg.AKOCOA::BREENFri Nov 05 1993 14:5317
    But there are laws and one is in regard to indenture which was
    practiced by major league baseball until 1976.  when the celtics
    drafted danny ainge and planned to have him play basketball when his
    baseball contract (short term in those days) expired the blue jays
    essentially said he was indentured to them.
    
    Under total "free enterprise" some would say Danny signed for life but
    society has outlawed serfdom.
    
    similarly society will put certain restrictions on free enterpriese run
    riot and vversa.
    
    The charlotte thing I am not against as it seems to be acting in favor
    of the market but wherever certain govt protections are asked for
    "enforce a contract" the enterprise has to expect some overseeing.
    
    In a nutshell it isn't that simple anymore
9.819MKFSA::LONGa foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mindFri Nov 05 1993 15:0915
>>    Fine, then no tax money for a Megaplex.  No more rent-free deals.  No
>>    more gifts of land.  The state can't be trusted in their negotiations 
>>    of these matters (besides, who do *you* really think is benefiting from 
>>    these deals?).  Let the market sort it out.  *That's* free enterprise.

	Abso-frggin-lootly!  On this we agree.

	In no way was I trying to put the NFL up on some pedastal as a
	shining example of how free enterprise works.  All the professional
	sports are the closest thing to serfdom we have.  I just feel that
	having a state-run NFL team is not what I would want my tax dollars
	spent on.


	billl
9.820MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Nov 05 1993 15:306
    re: first season tix
    
    TTom, didn't tix for the first season come as part of the PSL?
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.821PSL does not include any ticketsHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Nov 05 1993 15:358
Noop. You have to buy the PSL and then you have to each and every season
ticket thereafter.

The only catch about the first season is that if'n you don't want no part
of Clemson, you don't have to buy the first season tickets. But after
that, you gotta buy or sell the PSL, one way or the other.

TTom
9.822just when I thought I had it figured out...MKFSA::LONGa foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mindFri Nov 05 1993 15:4810
	I reread .821 several times and it sounds like you are saying that
	the PSL must be re-purchased every year along with the season tickets.
	Is that what you meant?  Or is the PSL a one-timer and the season
	tickets re-purchased every year?

	I thought the PSL was a one-timer that guarenteed you a season ticket,
	if you choose to purchase it, for as long as you hold that PSL.


	billl
9.823PSL once, tickets every yearHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Nov 05 1993 15:529
The PSL is a one-time thang. With it you get the rights to buy season
tickets but you do not get the tickets. You have to separetly purchase
the season tickets each year.

If, after the second season, you don't buy the season tickets, you
forfeit the PSL at which time you must sell it, either to another
individual or to the Panthers for resell and a markup, one would presume.

TTom
9.824MKFSA::LONGa foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mindFri Nov 05 1993 16:006
re .823

	Thanks TTom, that's what I thought.


	billl
9.825this sentence no verbHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Nov 05 1993 16:053
Yeah, somewhere in .821, something was missing.

TTom
9.827PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Nov 05 1993 17:171
    All I said is that Carolina Panther season tickets are very expensive.
9.828PSL + tickets = expensiveHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Nov 05 1993 17:354
Actually, the case you were making was that you lump the PSL with the
season tickets to arrive at the conclusion that this total is expensive.

TTom
9.830a rangeHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Nov 05 1993 18:323
Prices are fro 190 to 600 bucks for the season. Its a 10 ticket packet.

TTom
9.831PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Nov 05 1993 18:379
9.833CSC32::GAULKETue Nov 09 1993 14:016
    
    
    
     So, uhh, how long has Ned Beatty been coach of the Packers?
    
    
9.834PFSVAX::JACOBSo close to zero groundTue Nov 09 1993 18:527
    re-.1
    
    SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEL!!!!!!
    
    
    JaKe
    
9.835Inquiring mindlessPFSVAX::JACOBSo close to zero groundTue Nov 09 1993 19:299
    Anybody see the "celebration" the one KC guy did lasted night??
    
    He runs over towards the sidelines and gets down on 3 legs, with the
    other one lifted up like a dog at a hydrant???  What's he trying to
    prove with that, that he's a useless animal that needs kicked around a
    little??
    
    JaKe
    
9.836METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Nov 09 1993 19:323
I was gonna put that in the Ask JaKe note

The Crazy Met
9.837goneHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Tue Nov 09 1993 19:543
While you're at it, ask JaKe how come da Bears just cut da Fridge?

TTom
9.838couldn't spit too, but wouldn't be as effective16421::HEISERthe NBA: it's pretty darn goodTue Nov 09 1993 20:103
    Re: Tripod
    
    He's making a visual statement to the opposition's competentcy.
9.839CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Nov 10 1993 12:0810
>While you're at it, ask JaKe how come da Bears just cut da Fridge?

He ate himself outta the uniform.


I'm trying to figure out why Danny Boy Reeves cut Landetta in favor
of Horan.   The Denver kicking squad ain't THAT good......


'saw
9.840PFSVAX::JACOBSo close to zero groundWed Nov 10 1993 13:219
    
>>While you're at it, ask JaKe how come da Bears just cut da Fridge?
    
    Probably something to do with it costing the Bears too much to feed him
    at the training table, plus the fact that he has a whopping 8 tackles
    in 8 games, and his knees are buckling under his tonnage.
    
    JaKe
    
9.841QUASER::JACKSONTANeed a nap? Watch tv baseball!Wed Nov 10 1993 14:0311
      Horan is a great punter.  He can put it consistantly inside the 
    20 better than anyone.  His long punts, or lack of, is what got him
    canned.  After his knee tore up last year, he just didn't seem to kick
    the 55-60 yarders anymore.
    
      I thought Landetta was a pro-bowler a few times?
    
      This is just the start.  Wait 3 years.  The good OL the jints have
    now will most likely not be upgraded as they get older/injured.
    
      Tim
9.842CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childWed Nov 10 1993 15:5812
 Landetta was a probowler and also was the only guy in the league to average
 over 40 net yards per kick over the last 5 years. Horan is excellent at the
 pooch as you say Tim. 

 Landetta also tore up a knee last year and may not be totally healed. He
 is also like Pepper Johnson a free spirit who didn't quite see eye to eye
 with Good Time Danny....

 oh well atleast I don't have to worry about GTD bring Elway with him...

 mike
9.843officially a 'BoyHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Wed Nov 10 1993 18:2610
I guess it's official. Bernie has been signed by Dallas.

He steps in as #3 but Johnson is talking like he actually could start. I
guess this means that Hugh Millen is history and Bernie might actually
get a super bowl ring outta this.

The extra special bonus part of this is that Cleveland gets to pay him
the rest of the 5 mil they owe him.

TTom
9.844CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Wed Nov 10 1993 19:248
    Good fer Bernie!
    
    I guess he'll get his chance to show how good he can be with a real
    team behind him!
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
    
    (Closet Browns Fan, closet Kosar fan)
9.845PFSVAX::JACOBGonna show her my ding-dongWed Nov 10 1993 19:255
    What kind of dresses and pumps is he going to wear for Sunday's
    game????
    
    JaKe
    
9.846DECWET::METZGERAmerica's most beloved game show hostWed Nov 10 1993 19:286
I thought he was going to wear one of them Dallas Cowboy Cheerleader outfits...

ugh,,,what a mental image...

Metz
9.847DYPSS1::ROPERMAC IS BACK!Wed Nov 10 1993 19:3811
    I'm a bit surprised that Bernie is going to Dallas.  He's got to be
    thinking that this is only a temporary situation.  Will he be happy
    riding the bench?  Of course for Dallas, this is a fantastic move. 
    Bernie is still quite capable of leading a team.  He won't know what to
    think playing behind the line in Dallas, along with Smith, Irvin,
    Harper, et al.
    
    Aikman will most certainly be rested now I'd think.  If he needs even
    more time, so be it.  They play the lowly Falcons after this weekend.
    
     - Bob
9.848still can startHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Wed Nov 10 1993 19:4718
Bernie is obviously a hedge on whether or not Garrett can actually
perform as a starter.

So many times when the backup has to come in, he shines in that game only
to look like the scrub he is the nexted game when he starts. One need
look no further to the Salisbury situation in Minnesota where they were
drubbed by San Diego to celebrate his first start.

There are exceptions, most notable this year being Scott Mitchell but
even he came back to earth against the Jets.

I'd think that the Cowboys are just making sure that they have a Plan B
if'n Garrett caint get it done. I agree with Bernie's assessment of his
abilities and that is he's still able to start in the NFL. I'm a little
suprised that given the QB woes in Philly he didn't get a_offer there. I
mean, who wouldn't take Bernie over either O'Brien or Bubby?

TTom
9.849METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Nov 10 1993 19:494
Since Bernie can't move he needs a team with the type of OL that the
Cowboys have.

The Crazy Met
9.850good line, good team, good scheduleHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Wed Nov 10 1993 19:529
Totally agree, Crazy.

And it don't hurt to have Emmett Smith in the backfield witcha and having
Michael Irvin, Alvin Harper, and Jay Novacek as targets.

And the nexted 2 games against Phoenix and Atlanta won't hurt his cause,
neither.

TTom
9.851PFSVAX::JACOBGonna show her my ding-dongWed Nov 10 1993 19:536
    He just gotta hope he don't break a heel in the middle of the game. 
    AND, he better remember not to wear his girdle.
    
    
    JaKe
    
9.852CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Nov 10 1993 20:344
And I KNEW I was right -- Deberg went to MIAMI to back up
Mitchell...

The Jests indeed.....hmpphh....8^)
9.853I made a mistake, so shoot me!BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Nov 10 1993 21:2015
!           <<< Note 9.852 by CAMONE::WAY "You can't polish a turd" >>>
!
!And I KNEW I was right -- Deberg went to MIAMI to back up
!Mitchell...
!
!The Jests indeed.....hmpphh....8^)


	'Sas,

	Hey, I admitted I made a mistake, a rarity in SPROTS, you must admit.

	:-)

	Kevin
9.854Just don't do it on the day of my daughter's weddingCAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Nov 10 1993 22:159
Okay, we'll let if go this time.

I gave you a smilie over in the other topic.

But, if you REALLY wanna get shot, I got a few buddies
who could take care of da job, if you know what I mean....;^) ;^)


Don 'Saw
9.855USCTR1::KINGBe a MAN, low maintenance!!!Thu Nov 11 1993 00:306
    With Kosar and Deberg signings two former 1992 Pats QB got the axe... 
    Millen and Hobson....
    
    REK
    
    Can Zolak be far behind....
9.85616421::HEISERthe NBA: it's pretty darn goodThu Nov 11 1993 01:011
    It's only a natural a cross-dressing QB play for the Cowgirls.
9.857Trade you Aikman for ProelCNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childThu Nov 11 1993 10:518
 Dallas picked him for two reasons IMO, for a later trade and leverage
 against Aikman come contract time. We all saw how underhanded Jerry
 can get with Emitt, he's on record as stating that the way the Sowboys
 are playing that "They're playing is going to make Aikman the highest
 paid player in the league". He didn't say he was going to pay him.
 
 mike
9.858AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSThu Nov 11 1993 11:565
    Jake, now that Kosar has left the Almost Football Conference Central
    Division you can cut the skirt-wearing stuff.  He is now a member of
    the manly Cowboys and no longer a Brown. :)
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
9.859CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdThu Nov 11 1993 12:031
Yeah, now he's gonna wear cute little blue shorts and a white halter top....8^)
9.860Help be shopping the Galleria in no timeSPECXN::BROWNReal Men only need 12 bitsThu Nov 11 1993 13:198


	Bernie will fit right in in Big "D" it being the fashion capitol
of the southwest. I can't beleive JJ picked up this clown other than he has
to be better than Hugh Millen the pats reject. 

  Cadzilla2   
9.861some newsHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 11 1993 13:5915
more news:

Joe aint gonna start for KC. Krieg gets another start.

Sean Salisbury starts again for the Vikings. McMahon is still
recuperating from a separated shoulder.

Eric Swann had surgery on his knee and will be out for the season. The
Cards are claiming he was injured by a crackback block in the Eagles
game.

The proposed sale of the Dolphins fell through. The heirs of Joe Robbie
are trying to sell the team to pay off taxes.

TTom
9.862first half bestestHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 11 1993 14:5117
USA Today, in a_obvious ploy to promote professional sports at the
expense of the college games, has chosen their first half Whatevers of
the Year (WOYs).

Offensive MVP		Troy Aikman, QB, Dallas
Defensive MBP		Rod Woodson, CB, Pittsburgh
Top Coach		Dan Reeves, Giants
Special Team		Eric Metcalf, Cleveland
Offensive Rookie	Rick Mirer, QB, Seattle
Defensive Rookie	Eric Curry, DL, Tampa Bay
Kicker			John Carney, San Diego
Punter			Reggie Roby, Washington
Most Likely to be Fired	Joe Bugel, Phoenix
Biggest Surprise	Bernie Kosar's release by Cleveland
Biggest Flop		Richie Petitbon, Washington

TTom
9.863GWEN::ASHEDo you have to let it linger?Thu Nov 11 1993 15:402
    Carney over Jason Hanson?
    
9.864gets the nodHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 11 1993 15:589
They gave Carney the nod because of his record streak, 29 FGs without a
miss, and the fact that the Chargers have won 2 games without a
touchdown. Carney had 6 FGs in each of these games.

But, it's only USA Today and it's only for the first half. It looks like
the Chargers have turned it around and won't have to rely so heavily on
Carney.

TTom
9.865I like Bettis over Mirer too...CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childThu Nov 11 1993 16:0510
 I'd love to hear the reasoning for Aikman... "Cause John Madden said so",
 probably.....

 Certainly Barry Foster or Emitt deserve it more than the Boytoy of Sowland..

 Reeves? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa


9.866PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 11 1993 16:184
9.867GWEN::ASHEDo you have to let it linger?Thu Nov 11 1993 16:573
    I would too.... and maybe Sanders over either one... but I admit my
    bias there...
    
9.868Sanders walks?HBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 11 1993 17:036
Walt,

Speaking of Sanders, is he gonna walk out this week or not? The rumor is
that he'll pull a no show at the practice as Detroit has a bye this week.

TTom
9.869GWEN::ASHEDo you have to let it linger?Thu Nov 11 1993 17:072
    Don't know, haven't heard...
    
9.870Haw Haw!CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Nov 11 1993 17:3515
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 9.865             The National Football League (NFL)             865 of 869
CNTROL::CHILDS "I am airless, a vacuum child"        10 lines  11-NOV-1993 13:05
                      -< I like Bettis over Mirer too... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    
    Betchya scraped some enamel off yo' teeth typin' this in, eh wot?


MikeL
    
9.871Aikman's DeservingDYPSS1::ROPERMAC IS BACK!Thu Nov 11 1993 17:4213
    Aikman is an obvious choice at this juncture for MVP IMO.  True, Dallas
    didn't win a game until Smith came back, but that was more due to the
    emotional turmoil caused by his holdout than anything else.
    
    All one has to do is examine Aikman's numbers for the first half of the
    season.  He's on an awesome pace so far.  I read or heard from some
    reporter last week that over the last 25 or so games Aikman's put
    together a streak that's hard to match by any QB in NFL history.  Face
    it, the man's hot.  Certainly not to downplay Smith's contribution to
    the Cowboys, or Sander's to the Lions.  BTW, Aikman's QB rating is over
    100 thus far in the year.
    
    - Bob
9.872METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 11 1993 17:546
>  True, Dallas didn't win a game until Smith came back, but that
> was more due to the emotional turmoil caused by his holdout 

got any more of thjat stuff you must be smoking????

The Crazy Met
9.873DYPSS1::ROPERMAC IS BACK!Thu Nov 11 1993 18:0013
    re .872
    
    TCM, did you watch the Buffalo game?  That was a pitifully played game
    by Dallas.  One that they easily could've won without Emmit.  The
    players said so afterwards.  Most players felt Smith's physical
    absence didn't affect the team as much as the bickering, constant media
    attention focused on Smith, etc.
    
    HTH's,
    
    Bob
    
    
9.874CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childThu Nov 11 1993 18:232
naw...I always liked Bettis just hated that he did it for ND......
9.875PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 11 1993 18:306
9.876DYPSS1::ROPERMAC IS BACK!Thu Nov 11 1993 18:384
    Hey!  You guys are starting to make me feel silly over my "emotional
    turmoil" remark.  I resemble that!
    
    - Bob
9.877CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdThu Nov 11 1993 18:4212
>
>    Hey!  You guys are starting to make me feel silly over my "emotional
>    turmoil" remark.  I resemble that!
>    


I'd be careful about feeling silly too, there Bob.  Some of the folks
on the "Jerky Boys" CD are "silly", and I wouldn't wanna be like them.
Folks might start calling you "sizzle-chest".....8^)


'Saw
9.878PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 11 1993 18:512
    Sorry, Bob, but I've never bought the argument that peace & happiness
    can replace 100 yards/game or 30HR/100RBI, etc.
9.879and I think Emmitt's awsome...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Nov 11 1993 18:538
    He no one can say that Dallas would be dallas without emmitt, but look
    at the numbers, Emmitt isnt even the highest rating RB at this point.
    He doesnt lead in yrds, td, or avg so why would he be MVP to this point
    in the season.  Aikman gets my nod over Emmitt, not that dallas will go
    to far without either of them, but Emmitt can be replaced more readily
    then Aikman...(IMHO).
    
    									Mab
9.880METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 11 1993 18:547
not into that touchy feely stuff,huh Mac :-)

actually all you need to do is look at the 1972-1974 Oakland A's. They
fought with each other, some of 'em hated each other and they still
won 3 consecutive WS titles.

The Crazy Met
9.881(8^)PFSVAX::JACOBGonna show her my ding-dongThu Nov 11 1993 18:5411
    
    >>Jake, now that Kosar has left the Almost Football Conference Central
    >>Division you can cut the skirt-wearing stuff.  He is now a member of
    >>the manly Cowboys and no longer a Brown. :)
    
    He's got a whole line of blue-whiteand silver dresses, hot pants, and
    strapless gowns lined up for his Dall-Ass debut.  Plus, he'll be the
    boy toy in the locker room.
    
    JaKe
    
9.882METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 11 1993 18:566
re: .879

Pro-rate his yards and TD by how many games he has played. You'll get
a different, more realistic ranting that way.

The Crazy Met
9.883PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 11 1993 18:579
9.884PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 11 1993 18:582
    First Bonds, now Kosar.  You Pittsburghers really do need to learn how
    to let go.
9.885Emmitt has done a GREAT job, no questionMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Nov 11 1993 19:0114
    There not looking at 4 games, there looking at the first 1/2 of the
    season.  I agree Emmitt's #'s considering that he missed 2 games are
    pretty darn GREAT.  But hey its not the league or teams fault that he
    missed those 2 games so why whould they be over looked, the league is
    1/2 way thru the season and emmitt has x, yrds, y tds on z carries.
    Thats it, no well he missed this or that, just the raw #'s and W/L.
    Emmitt hasnt lost a game yet this season, but no one's going to call
    it a perfect season ....
    
    Funny thing is that the first game VS washington, emmitt may not have
    made a difference in the W/L but the 2nd game would have been alot
    different with emmitt in there....Oh well...
    
    								MaB
9.886MKFSA::LONGHelp! I've lost my OBL and can't get up!Thu Nov 11 1993 19:021
	Hey Mac, Do Bonds, Kosar, then yourself!
9.887METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 11 1993 19:035
> Hey Mac, Do Bonds, Kosar, then yourself!

billl, you should be ashamed of yourself for stealing JaKe's response :-)

The Crazy Met
9.888Most Vaulable, not 2nd or 3rd most valuable...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Nov 11 1993 19:059
    Plus who's more valuable for the 1st 8 games, a QB who was there
    for training camp and played all 8 games or a RB who sat out the
    first 2 games for more $$$ causing a lesser team to be feilded and
    causing off field controversy and diversion for the team.
    
    If you said right now, your a Franchise owner and you can have either
    Troy Aikman for the whole season or Emmitt for 14 games who would you
    chose....
    								mab
9.889My take on the Cowboys and EmmittCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Thu Nov 11 1993 19:0635
>>               <<< Note 9.875 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>

>>    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  Just like all those shining happy people in the

Regarding Dallas' loss to Buffalo.

As I recall, Lin Elliott missed two field goals in that game.  Do you
think he would have made them if Smith had been playing?  And had
he made just one of them, Dallas would have probably went for the
game winning field goal in the closing minutes of the game rather
than trying for a TD.  

The way I see it, Dallas would have probably won that game if they
had picked up Eddie Murray one week earlier.  I'm not saying that
Murray has had the impact on the 'boys that Smith has, but look
at the first few games they won this year.  Murray was kicking
3 or 4 field goals a game.  Even against Philadelphia his kicking
made a big difference.

Against Washington, I don't think anybody could have made a difference
there.  The Cowboys just plain old got their butts whipped.  In
particular, their defense stunk up the joint.

Having Emmitt in the line up has made a hell of a difference, but other parts 
of the team was breaking down that had nothing to do with Emmit.  He
doesn't return punts, kick field goals or play defense.  It seems that
all of those factions have improved since he returned.  To say that
Emmitt's late signing didn't have an negative impact on team morale and 
generate a lot of distraction is to ignore the facts.  The Cowboys
are back on track now partly because Smith is back and playing great,
and partly because morale is up and distraction is down.

Just my humble opinion, of course.

Jerry
9.890LDUC alertMETSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 11 1993 19:063

The Crazy Met
9.891not actingHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Thu Nov 11 1993 19:0814
Emmit is leading the league in most categories if'n you look at it as
production per game.

He's averaging 110+ yards a game, 1 TD a game and a league leading 5.2
yards per rush attempt. As comparison, Barry Sanders is averaging
slightly less per game, a half a TD a game and a rushing average of 4.7
yards per attempt.

The kick in the pants for Dallas is that if Jones hadn't a been such a
butthead about this, the Cowboys may have gone undefeated for the year.
By all accounts, Jones aint learned his lesson yet. He's still acting
stupid about re-signing Aikman.

TTom
9.892PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 11 1993 19:1014
9.893METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Nov 11 1993 19:115
undefeated?? long shot, especially in that division.
When Dallas went 1-15 a few years back, remember the one game they won?
They beat Washington in Washington.

The Crazy Met
9.894PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 11 1993 19:1416
9.895Aikman has move weapons and options with the ball them emmittMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Nov 11 1993 19:1717
    Geezz.. He's not the 2nd coming...  Look Emmitt is awsome Im just
    saying without Aikman throwing arm and without Harper and Irvin 
    catching the ball emmitt gets less wholes less yardage and less
    TD's.  But the same goes the other way too, without Emmitt's excellent
    running abililty Aikman would have less time to pass and the receivers
    would not be open as much, this doesnt even take into account one of
    the best TE's in the league as well.  They all help each other, but
    bottom line no Aikman, then Harper, Irvin and Novecek become less
    valuable and emmitt gets more attention paid to him....
    			
    								Mab
    
    Plus they played washington and buffalo, granted washington has 
    since takin the big plunge but after week 1 many felt washington
    was going to make a comeback, obviously week 1's performance was
    a fluke (in a good way for washington) and a fluke (In a bad way
    for dallas).
9.896(8^)PFSVAX::JACOBGonna show her my ding-dongThu Nov 11 1993 19:1818
    Hey MtM,
    
    Go take a rugby ball(do they call it a ball in rugby??  ya know, they
    call the field the "pitch" when nobody at all pitches in the game, )
    stick it where the sun don't shine......
    
    I cain dislike whatever freakin' player I want to dislike, and that's
    the prerogative of any fan in any sport.  That's what makes following
    sports fun, deciding who to hate and who to love and who not to give
    two good sh_ts about, ain't it.
    
    SO what if'n I hate the biggest example of brain death in baseball, and
    the best cross-dressed player in football?????
    
    (8^0
    
    JaKe
    
9.897DYPSS1::ROPERMAC IS BACK!Thu Nov 11 1993 20:2110
    re .895
    
    Mab, I believe you hit the nail on the proverbial head!  It's definetly
    a team game.  Emmit Smith would be nowhere good as he is IMO, if Aikman
    weren't back there pitching the ball.  Defenses could key on the
    running game.  Same goes for Troy.  Without Emmit, the defense doubles
    up on the receivers, etc.  The thing that makes the Cowboys offense the
    best in the NFL is their diversity.
    
    - Bob
9.898Beef Jerky?DYPSS1::ROPERMAC IS BACK!Thu Nov 11 1993 20:2516
    re .877
    
>>I'd be careful about feeling silly too, there Bob.  Some of the folks
>>on the "Jerky Boys" CD are "silly", and I wouldn't wanna be like them.
>>Folks might start calling you "sizzle-chest".....8^)


>>'Saw
    
    Huh?  Color me lost.  'Saw, you're gonna have to explain to me the
    "Jerky Boys", "Silliness", and while your at it the "sizzle-chest" part
    too!  I must be living in a cave.  I've never heard of the "Jerky
    Boys".
    
     - Bob
    
9.899CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childFri Nov 12 1993 10:5811
  
 Sure blame Elliot because the Dallas Boytoy couldn't get it in the endzone
 without Emitt. Aikman's stats are built on big yardage #'s and completions
 not TD's. Sure seems to me the Sowboys are getting alot more 6's now that
 Emitt's back....

 Now if you want to consider Boytoy and Emitt make one another look good
 than make the sam comparision between Barry Foster and Neil ODonnell?
 9 td's almost 890 yards of total offense? Foster's my MVP......

 mike 
9.900CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Nov 12 1993 12:2013
>    Huh?  Color me lost.  'Saw, you're gonna have to explain to me the
>    "Jerky Boys", "Silliness", and while your at it the "sizzle-chest" part
>    too!  I must be living in a cave.  I've never heard of the "Jerky
>    Boys".
    
Jerky Boys are a comedy "act", that have a CD out.  They answer want ads
and such over the phone, and record the calls.  The stuff is hysterical.
Look for the CD in the comedy section of any record store....

You have to hear it....

'Saw    

9.901AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSFri Nov 12 1993 14:127
    Guys, we're back to Russell-Chamberlain, Hakeem-Ewing rathole.  Both
    Emmitt and Aikman play vital roles and can not be compared since they
    play different positions.  
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
    
    BTW, I'd take Hakeem over Ewing.
9.902PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Nov 12 1993 14:354
    With Smith 6-0
    Without Smith 0-2
    With Aikman 5-2
    Without Aikman 1-0
9.903GWEN::ASHELes Nessman Live, from the mall...Fri Nov 12 1993 15:421
   When were they without Aikman?  He threw for 2 TD's before he got hurt.
9.904RatholeMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Nov 12 1993 16:015
    YEs but what's Dallas record with smith playing when aikman does not
    play at all :-).  Emmitt is 6-0 with Aikman/Irvin/Harper/Novecek all
    playing...
    
    								MaB
9.905PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Nov 12 1993 16:199
9.906GWEN::ASHELes Nessman Live, from the mall...Fri Nov 12 1993 16:412
    Because they cruised with a lead he gave them... right?  That 50 yarder
    to Harper took a lot of wind out of their sails...
9.907Dallas needs all there players to be greatMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Nov 12 1993 16:5423
    The game was won when Aikman went out.. the Giants scored 9pts, Aikman
    throw 2 TD's so if anything it made no difference on the outcome,
    except they fed Emmitt the rest of the game to run the clock down.  And
    this just add's to why emmitt has such great #'s.  If Aikman hadnt
    thrown the 2 TD's to give Dallas the Lead they wouldnt have been
    running the ball so much at the end of the game.  And if Dallas Defense
    doesnt stop the opponents it would force Dallas to go to the air more
    thus taking away from Emmitt's #'s.  So yes emmitt is a big part of
    there team but take away the OL and Emmitt goes Nowhere (NO hole's no
    protection) Take away the Defense and Dallas plays catchup therefore
    going to the air more.  take away the QB or WR's and the Defense's all
    focus on Emmitt.....
    
    Emmitt is the Man (at the RB spot), Id say he's the #1 or #2, with the
    question still out on weather Barry Sandars is the best pure RB in the
    League.  Thurman still appears to be the best all around back...
    
    Thurman has 5 100yrd games out of 8 with 780+yrds (Im missing week9
    but know he went over 100) plus he has 22+receptions for 182+yrds.
    This is a slow year by Thurman's standards but he's still all around
    great.  Im not sure what the 3 have done on turnovers to date...
    
    								MaB
9.908VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNewJoisey-WeMindVeryMuchIfYouVote...Fri Nov 12 1993 17:025
    	The "real" MVP is the entire Dallas offensive line.  They have more
    pancakes than an IHOP on a busy morning.  Course giving due to fat guys
    like Newton and Gogan is marketing suicide.
    
    				/Don
9.909sorting it outHBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Fri Nov 12 1993 17:055
re: Newton and Gogan.

Was it ever decided if'n either of these could box 2 rounds?

TTom
9.910PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Nov 12 1993 18:132
    So, if the offensive line is that good, why couldn't Emmitt's backup do
    the job for the first two weeks?
9.911PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 15 1993 13:199
    So Bernie Kosar led the Cowboys to victory.  I guess that cog Emmit
    Smith had nothing to do with it.  It musta been one of them great team
    victories.
    
    MaB has made me see the light.  There is no such thing as a Most
    Valuable Player in a team sport.  I think Michael Jordan should give
    all of those MVPs back to the NBA and acknowledge the fact that if it
    weren't for guys like James Edwards and BJ Armstrong he wouldn't be
    where he is today.
9.912KEEP ON ROLLING...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 15 1993 18:1918
    -1, please be realistic.  Emmitt has not proven that the team cannot
    win without him (sorry). Chicago did prove they couldnt win without
    Michael and there's only 4 other guys in BBall to pick up the slack.
    
    And honestly without Kosar I think the Boys would have lost this game.
    But more importantly if the Defense Didnt Shutdown Phoenix dallas would
    have lost this game.
    
    I guess those 4 receptions for 102 yrds could have come from any QB
    in the leauge ????  Granted the 63yrd reception was awsome tackle
    breaking by Emmitt and nothing to do with the QB.....
    
    I guess Buffalo would have definatly beat the NYG in there first
    SB if Thomas had not lost his helmet, seeing that Buffalo with Thurman
    beat the giants :-) :-) :-) (this is using Emmitt=WIN for Dallas
    theory)
    
    								mab
9.913PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 15 1993 19:1828
9.914Anyone got a rule book handy?MKFSA::LONGHelp! I've lost my OBL and can't get up!Sat Nov 27 1993 22:4321
    I've got a question for all you knowledgeable fans regarding the fiasco
    in the Miami-Dallas game.  
    
    If Lett had not touched to ball and a Miami player dived on the ball
    would it not have been first down Miami anyway?  I'm pretty sure that
    it had crossed the first down marker after it was blocked.
    
    Here's the way I recall the rules.  If a field goal attempt is blocked
    either team can recover the ball.  That is the offense can recover (but
    not advance) the ball.  If the attempt was tried on fourth down and the
    ball does not cross the point which the kicking team need to get to in
    order to get a first down, when recovered by the kicking team, it is 
    first and ten for the non-kicking team.  If the defense recovers then
    it is first and ten regardless of where it is.
    
    If the above is true then Miami could have jumped on the ball even if
    Lett does not touch it.  Therefore Lett made a "heads-up" play, but
    just didn't execute it very well.
    
    
    billl
9.915METSNY::francusMets in '94Sun Nov 28 1993 00:069
Slightly off there billl.

If the kicking team gets to the ball first then the team on defense gets the
ball - not sure where but no worse than their own 20 yard line. 
If the defense recovers the ball they can advance it, however once the defense
touches it BOTH teams can advance the ball which is what happened in the
Miam-Dallas game on TG.

The Crazy Met
9.916FGROCK::MURPHYThe two LousMon Nov 29 1993 04:1118
    If the ball is "recovered" by the kicking team after a block -
    BEHIND the line of scrimmage, the kicking team can try to advance
    it. If they touch it past the line of scrimmage, the ball is spotted
    at the 20 or original line of scrimmage, whichever is better for
    the defending team.
    
    Once Lett touched the ball before it was blown dead (by stopping
    or downed by Miami) it became a live ball.
    
    Another scenario - FG blocked, recovered by kicking team, kicking
    team tries, to advance ball, runner is subjected to a face mask.
    15 yd. penalty against the defense, automatic first down - possession
    had never changed yet. Happened this weekend to BU's benefit - if UNI
    had just tackled the man with no foul, they get the ball back.
    BU scored the winner two plays later.
    
    Murph
    
9.9177806::ASHEWhat happened to Oran Juice Jones?Mon Nov 29 1993 12:273
    Right... after the ball goes past the line of scrimmage, the kicking
    team can't get possession or advance it unless the receiving team
    touches it.  Like a tipped punt, same thing...
9.918MKFSA::LONGHelp! I've lost my OBL and can't get up!Mon Nov 29 1993 13:0511
	Okay...there was no way I was going to believe TC*, but if Sir Walter
	says so, it must be so.

	I guess I was just hoping that Lett was the only one thinking straight.

	It does make sense, though, that if it is blocked/touched by the 
	defense at the line, then it would be recoverable by the offense.
	But when did obscure rules like this ever make sense?

	
	billl
9.919QUASER::JACKSONTAElway for MVP?Mon Nov 29 1993 15:131
      It's the same rules as for punting...
9.920Lett the rule be understoodOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Mon Nov 29 1993 18:349
    Several years ago the Eagles won a game in OT vs Giants when they ran
    in a FG attempt that the Giants had blocked behind the line of
    scrimmage.
    
    The rule makes sense..otherwise you would invite scenarios of kickers
    belting the ball at defensive players in the hope that the kicing team
    can recover further downfield.
    
    Didn't Oakland beat San Diego in the early 80' that way?
9.921CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 29 1993 19:169
>    
>    Didn't Oakland beat San Diego in the early 80' that way?
>


No, that was Stabler's famous "Forward Fumble"


'Saw
9.922what time they gonna do it?CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesTue Nov 30 1993 13:3112
    
    
    	Yabbut just to keep ya appraised of what's happening,  today's the
    day that the NFL announces who gets the expansion team.  I think St.
    Loooee, Baltimore and someplace in Florida are the main contendah's.
    
    hth
    
    I remain,
    <witty remark goes here>
    Kev
    
9.923QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyTue Nov 30 1993 13:526
      Just whats needed,  another florida team.  Baltimore don't need one
    either.  There are enough teams in the north-east area.  Memphis is
    better geographically,  but market wise is questionable, and St. louuy
    will get the hapless Pats....
    
      Tim
9.924Headline said that JacksonvilleCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Nov 30 1993 13:570
9.925PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 14:324
    that Jacksonville what, bob?
    
    Baltimore is also trying for a CFL franchise.  Someone in that city
    wants some kind of football bad.
9.926Baltimore Rams?HBAHBA::HAASSchlegelian DialecticTue Nov 30 1993 14:343
The latest rumor on Baltimore is that the LA Rams are gonna move there.

TTom
9.927PTOVAX::JACOBJohn Elway is so YUMMY!!!Tue Nov 30 1993 15:298
    
    >>Baltimore is also trying for a CFL franchise.  Someone in that city
    >>wants some kind of football bad.
    
    OR, some kind of BAD football.
    
    JaKe
    
9.928The paper said that Jacksonville is now the frontrunnerCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Nov 30 1993 17:081
&%&&^( new PC...
9.9297806::ASHEWhat happened to Oran Juice Jones?Tue Nov 30 1993 17:532
    No annoucement yet...
    
9.930Jville announcedHBAHBA::HAASSchlegelian DialecticTue Nov 30 1993 19:204
Some guy from Jacksonville is up at the podium and thanking everyone,
looking like he done won something.

TTom
9.931confirmed - JacksonvilleCSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesTue Nov 30 1993 19:248
    
    Yabbut my SKYPager news report just came in - indeed, Jacksonville
    got the franchise.
    
    I remain,
    wondering about the Pats now....
    Kev
    
9.932PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 19:275
9.933fishy?HBAHBA::HAASSchlegelian DialecticTue Nov 30 1993 19:5011
Just like the lasted announcement stunk of a fix for St. Louis, this
announcement has its own odor.

Could this be the setup for:

	o the Pats, lease and landlord notwithstanding, could be headed
	  to St. Louis?

	o the Rams headed to Baltimore?

TTom
9.934CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Nov 30 1993 19:555
9.936DECWET::METZGERAmerica's most beloved game show hostTue Nov 30 1993 20:0130
As stated before the NFL will not let one of their largest media market go
without a team....

I'm suprised. I thought St Louis was a total lock. The team they have in place
must really be a bunch of bufoons to blow this opportunity.

The only great conspiracy scenario I see now is Pat to St Louis, Rams to
Baltimore and then immediate expansion of the league to include a new New
England and LA franchise (with the pats getting a new stadium as part of the
admission fee)

BTW - the CFL grey cup was played this past weekend and it was a more exciting
game than anything put on by the NFL. The semifinals were even better,  played
in below zero temps with several running backs getting frostbite and telling
the coach not to hand the ball off to them because they couldn't feel it...

I think the NFl should adopt 2 CFL rules. Lengthen the end zone by 10  more
yards so it would be 20 yards deep preventing defenses from playing a 7 man
zone inside the 10 and  using the back of the end zone to defense the pass. It
would boost the scoring troubles teams are having inside hte 20  and lenghten
field goals by 10 yards to boot....

With that...make all kickoffs and punts mandatorily returned. If the kick
return team doesn't get out of the end zone give the kickers 1 point. There is
nothing more boring than seeing all the downed in the end  zone kick returns
this year....


Metz
9.937PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 20:161
    Hey =bob, that wasn't a wet blanket one-liner back there, was it?
9.938I'm convinced; I think they're gone...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Nov 30 1993 20:1731
> I'm suprised. I thought St Louis was a total lock. The team they have in place
> must really be a bunch of bufoons to blow this opportunity.
    
    It all boils down to Orthwein being the money guy behind the St. Louis
    bid at the same time that he was the owner of the Patriots.  If he 
    doesn't like the terms of the expansion deal, then he walks, which he 
    did.  I think all this business of a falling-out between Orthwein and 
    the rest of the St. Louis management team a couple of months ago was a 
    big smokescreen around the real issue which is the fact that Orthwein 
    didn't like the deal, both on the St. Louis end and on the sale of the
    Patriots.  Orthwein had the money which meant he had the power behind 
    the St. Louis team, which means that even if there were disagreements 
    with the lesser parties he was the guy in charge.  Instead, he just 
    packed up and left. 
    
> As stated before the NFL will not let one of their largest media market go
> without a team....
    
    I really am afraid that the Pats are history in New England.  Look for
    expansion in the next go-round but only if Massachusetts bends over
    with the Megaplex (it's not going to happen in the time it takes to
    pack up a couple of Mayflowers).  Fact is, we can talk all we want about 
    the size of the market, but with the current situation with the lousy 
    stadium deal and the lousy team and the lousy ratings (when the team 
    isn't blacked out altogether), the Pats aren't making big money for the 
    NFL and haven't for years.  There's always that "potential", but perhaps 
    the other owners just got sick of it all...
    
    glenn
    
9.939PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 30 1993 20:205
9.940VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesTue Nov 30 1993 20:215
    	I'm not the bitter sort.  I wish the good folks of St. Louis the
    same luck this storied franchise has had since its inception.  And I
    sincerely mean that!
    
    				/Don
9.941QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyTue Nov 30 1993 21:328
      In the "American Football Conference" somone said that the new
    florida team colors are dark blue and gold.  Just what we need, more
    dark colored unis.  At least it taint black,  but dark blue like
    michigan is close enough.
    
      Need other colors...Howwa bout some pastels (-)
    
      Tim
9.942good one16421::HEISERbut I *like* it!!!Wed Dec 01 1993 02:011
    /Slasher, that one was a piece of work!
9.944CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 01 1993 12:0613
The chances of Connecticut getting the Patriots are about the same as me
winning the Olympic 100 meters in the nexted Olympics -- slim and none, and
slim just walked out the door.

Since Day 1 I thought the idea totally ludicrous, and if it happens I'll
dump a steamy one in a corner and eat it.


The big thing is that that Pats NEED a NEW stadium.  It's the laughing stock
of the league,....


'Saw
9.945CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Wed Dec 01 1993 12:3617
The Conn. deal for the Pats was based on the ultimate "Conn" man Fran Murray 
buying the team.  Murray has proven that without big bucks behind him, he has 
a hard timing buying a Dove bar at the local Cumberland Farms.

As far as the stadium is concerned, while the cement structure in Foxboro may 
not be the best, it is far from the dump it is portrayed to be.  The problem is 
that the Pats don't own it, and in fact have a standard business deal type 
contract on it.  The various owners ahve whined ever since this happened that
the state and city of Boston should drop it's draws and grap its collective 
ankles for them, and build a megaplex.  As any of us who know Massachusetts 
politics knows, this will happen about the time that Saw dines on that steamy
pile.

Of course Slasher, you know that the cheerleaders will still perform every other
Sunday, even if the Pats move...

=Bob=
9.9467806::ASHEWhat happened to Oran Juice Jones?Wed Dec 01 1993 12:502
    Yeah, more like the Oakland Invaders or UCLA type jerseys...
    
9.947PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 01 1993 14:463
    This morning I heard another rumor of a team moving.  The Cincinnati
    Bengals have now joined the list of teams that could move to one of the
    losers of the expansion sweepstakes.
9.949CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Wed Dec 01 1993 15:1511
    RE: Cincinnati
    
    Yup Mike Brown tried to scare the folks here, in Cincy, but threatening 
    a move.  They have recently decided to refurb Riverfront and the
    Bengals have signed a contract to stay until 2000.
    
    I think you must have heard an old rumor.
    
    Live from the '93 most live-able city in North America...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.950Perhaps the NFL will fight again...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 01 1993 15:2433
    
  >> There's always that "potential", but perhaps the other owners 
  >> just got sick of it all...
  >  
  >   I honestly don't see what the Pats record or tv ratings have to do with
  >   who gets a new franchise. What's more is that I think the Pats have only
  >   failed to sell out one game this year. And that one was close to a sell 
  >   out. There is support for the team up here although I agree, they look
  >   like they're gone.
    
    It's not the biggest consideration, but I think the owners had to be
    aware of the consequences of their decision, and the fate of the NE 
    franchise ranks right up there.  That much was evident when the topic
    came up at the press conference and Tagliabue made his official
    proclamation.  It's obvious that the NFL really did want to put that 
    expansion team in St. Louis to clear up a lot of problems, and gave 
    them all sorts of preferential treatment to get it done, but St. Louis
    couldn't come through.  
    
    All things considered, the strength of that statement that the Patriots 
    would not be going anywhere per the NFL's agreement with Orthwein is
    encouraging.  At least the NFL *might* be willing to fight.  But there 
    are still unanswered questions: why did Orthwein pull out of the St. 
    Louis team when he stood to be a hero in his hometown and according to 
    most reports all along acquire a license to print money with a sweetheart 
    stadium deal that would be there, if he did not have an even better deal 
    available to him?  And why is Orthwein's "financial adviser" continuing
    to publicly say, almost in bold defiance to questions demanding whether
    bids from other cities would be considered, that any and all offers will
    be looked at?  This matter isn't closed...
    
    glenn
       
9.951New team and possible re-alignmentPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 01 1993 15:39132
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Nov 29-30, 1993:

--------
Subject: Jacksonville awarded expansion team
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 18:21:33 PST
 
	ROSEMONT, Ill. (UPI) -- The National Football League Tuesday bypassed
the chance to re-link itself with the past and moved again into the
expanding markets of the New South by awarding a franchise to the city
of Jacksonville, Fla.
	Jacksonville was seemingly only an afterthought a month ago, but
emerged as the overwhelming choice to receive the NFL's 30th team.
League owners approved the new franchise by a 26-2 vote.
	St. Louis, which lost an NFL team when the Cardinals moved to Phoenix
in 1988, had been a heavy favorite to win a new franchise last month.
But squabbling among would-be ownership groups and the possibility of
future lawsuits caused the NFL to look elsewhere.
	The NFL owners chose Jacksonville despite its proximity to the
league's other new team -- the Carolina Cougars.
	``There's a very strong feeling that Jacksonville is a hotbed of
football interest,'' NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue said in announcing
the decision.
	``It's in a part of the country that has a tremendous interest in
football and in the NFL. Even with the fact that the other franchise
went to Charlotte, there was a feeling that the NFL was under-
represented in the southeast part of the country. Jacksonville provides
a very strong base for the National Football League in that area.''
	The Carolina Cougars and Jacksonville Jaguars will both begin play in
1995, with an expansion draft and possible re-alignment facing the
league during the next two years.
	In addition to St. Louis, the cities of Baltimore and Memphis had
made bids for a new team. But the Jacksonville ownership group headed by
J. Wayne Weaver prevailed, thanks in part to a large season-ticket
commitment already made by football fans in his town.
	``The decision that the NFL made here today will make you proud,''
Weaver told Tagliabue. ``We will be a great new partner for the NFL.''
	The announcement touched off waves of celebration in Jacksonville and
came as a shock to those who had supported the St. Louis effort.
	``We've lived this dream for 15 years,'' said former Jacksonville
mayor Jake Godbolt, who started his city's bid for a team. ``I feel so
elated, I feel so warm, I feel so good. This is a wonderful moment.
	``We're not talking about crime, we're not talking about kids getting
in trouble, we're talking about something really happy, and God knows,
Jacksonville deserves this moment of happiness.''
	Jacksonville has an existing facility in the 70,000-plus Gator Bowl,
but is the smallest television market of the five candidates, ranking
56th in the nation. The new group plans to invest $120 million to
renovate the stadium and Tagliabue said the Jacksonville television
market, though small, is one of the fastest growing in the country.
	Weaver's partners Jeb Bush, son of former President George Bush;
Jacksonville business executive Thomas Petway III; and former NFL
defensive back Deron Cherry.
	``It's the beginning of a new era,'' Weaver said. ``This takes a
middle market city and takes it to a new level. We're going to have the
biggest celebration you have ever seen, beginning tonight.''
	A new ownership application for a potential Baltimore franchise was
submitted by Al Lerner during the past month. Lerner joined two other
groups vying for a franchise in Baltimore. One group was headed by
billionaire investor Malcolm Glazer and the other by Leonard ``Boogie''
Weinglass.
	``We worked for this for two solid years,'' Glazer lamented. ``We did
everything we had to do....I'm just practically ready to start crying.''
	The St. Louis group, which was headed by Stanley Kroenke, also
submitted new documentation during the past month. The investment group
had been headed by Jerry Clinton, but he withdrew and Kroenke took over
the leadership of the St. Louis entry. Former Chicago Bears star Walter
Payton, the all-time leading rusher in NFL history, was also a member of
the St. Louis group.
	``It's shocking, to say the least, that Jacksonville was selected
over St. Louis,'' Clinton said. ``I know that our market demographics
are much better than Jacksonville's. I'm at a loss for words.''
	``It's sort of like you've been knocked out and people are talking to
you...(but) you don't comprehend,'' Payton said.
	The new clubs will pay approximately $140 million to join the NFL for
the 1995 season.
	Jacksonville previously fielded franchises in the World Football
League and the United States Football League. The city nearly had NFL
football four times in the past.
	Robert Irsay considered moving the Colts from Baltimore before
relocating in Indianapolis, the New Orleans Saints came close to moving
to Jacksonville before the team was sold to local investor Tom Benson,
and both the Houston Oilers and Atlanta Falcons have made overtures to
Jacksonville.
	Charlotte's team will be called the Carolina Panthers. The chief
investor is former NFL player Jerry Richardson, who heads the highly
successful Flagstar Companies food service chain. Charlotte investors
plan to build a 72,000-seat stadium.

--------
Subject: NFL re-alignment on the horizon
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 18:21:33 PST
 
	The awarding of NFL franchises to Charlotte, N.C., and Jacksonville,
Fla., almost automatically means at least moderate re-alignment within
pro football.
	And, as it has in the past, the moving of teams from one division to
another could mean as much debate as there was over the selecting of the
new franchises.
	With 30 teams, the NFL becomes perfectly balanced with six divisions
of five teams each. But there is little chance the new teams will be
neatly fitted into the existing four-team divisions -- the AFC Central
and NFC West.
	To do so would mean putting one of the new teams in a division with
Pittsburgh, Houston, Cincinnati and Cleveland and the other in a
division with Atlanta, New Orleans, the Los Angeles Rams and San
Francisco.
	But there will be howls of protests from some owners if massive re-
alignment is attempted along strict geographical logic.
	Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones has let it be known he will fight
any move to take his team out of a division that includes the high-
profile markets of New York, Philadelphia and Washington.
	``I think it is generally understood within the league,'' Jones said,
``that no team will be forced to move if that team does not want to.''
	Jones also said he rejects the argument that aligning teams
geographically mean large savings.
	``The only difference in traveling to New York instead of Houston is
the jet fuel in the airplane,'' Jones said. ``And that is less than we
spend trying to sign one player on the practice squad.''
	The biggest problem facing the league involves the NFC West. The
Atlanta Falcons would be a natural rival for the new teams and would be
a likely candidate to move from its present home. So would New Orleans.
But which teams take their place?
	The Phoenix Cardinals would be one choice, but that still leaves two
other teams to go into the NFC West and one to take the place of Phoenix
in the NFC East.
	It would be natural to have Charlotte, Jacksonville, Atlanta, Miami
and Tampa Bay in one division, but once that happens, large scale
juggling must take place elsewhere.
	That will be the main trouble with re-alignment. Each change means
another change somewhere else. In the long run, the squabbles may be
more entertaining that the games themselves.
9.952St.Louis ReactionPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 01 1993 15:4072
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Subject: St. Louis shocked by NFL snub
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 16:27:07 PST

	ST. LOUIS (UPI) -- Plans for a celebration on the St. Louis riverfront
were shattered when National Football League Commissioner Paul Tagliabue
announced Tuesday that Jacksonville had been awarded an expansion
franchise.
	The announcement stunned many St. Louis residents, who had considered
their city was the leading contender for the NFL's 30th team.
	One of the strongest reactions came from Jerry Clinton, who had
headed the St. Louis NFL Partnership, a group that worked for some five
years to bring an expansion franchise to the city. Clinton's group
pulled out of the effort last month after being unable to put together
sufficient financial backing.
	``It's shocking, to say the least, that Jacksonville was selected
over St. Louis,'' Clinton said in an interview with KMOX Radio. ``I know
that our market demographics are much better than Jacksonville's. I'm at
a loss for words.''
	Also expressing disappointment was E. Stanley Kroenke, a shopping-
center developer from Columbia with marital ties to the Walton family of
Wal-Mart fame. Kroenke headed the Gateway NFL Partnership, the group
that took over the city's effort to win a franchise last month after the
St. Louis NFL Partnership pulled out.
	``I'm a little surprised,'' Kroenke said in an interview with KMOX. 
``I really thought we had an excellent chance. I just think that there
were some things that had to be overcome, and (Tagliabue) pointed out
that if we hadn't stepped in in those difficult circumstances five weeks
ago, St. Louis would have been gone then.''
	Confusion over the city's attempts to win the franchise apparently
played a part in the NFL's decision. Along with the sometimes
conflicting efforts between the two ownership groups, league officials
may have been wary of possible litigation from entrepreneur Fran Murray.
	Murray, formerly part-owner of the NFL's New England Patriots, was a
part of the St. Louis NFL Partnership. Some city and league officials
had expressed concerns that Murray might file suit if he was shut out of
the ownership group awarded a St. Louis franchise.
	Also seen as hurting the city's chances were confusion over the lease
for a football team to play in the new domed stadium under construction
as an expansion of the Cervantes Convention Center downtown. The $260
million stadium is being built to hold 70,000 spectators for football
games. The lease still is held by the St. Louis NFL Partnership, which
reportedly had been unable to reach an agreement on the matter with the
Gateway NFL Partnership.
	Plans for an evening celebration and fireworks on Laclede's Landing,
the city's historic entertainment district along the Mississippi River,
were scuttled by the announcement.
	At sports bars throughout the city and surrounding areas, customers
were disappointed as Tagliabue's announcement was broadcast and owners
were disheartened as their plans for parties went down the drain.
	``It's very depressing,'' said Bob Raaf, 47, owner of Schmiezing's in
midtown St. Louis. The bar is near the Arena, where the St. Louis Blues
of the National Hockey League play, and is a popular gathering place for
hockey and other sports fans.
	``We stocked up with an extra load of beer today,'' Raaf said. He
said what he hoped would be a euphoric atmosphere in his bar fizzled
when the news was heard.
	Customers at Schmiezing's also bemoaned the city's lost opportunity
to get a new franchise. St. Louis has been without professional football
since the Cardinals moved to Phoenix following the 1987 season.
	``Personally, I wasn't surprised at all,'' said Bruce Heintz, 57, of
St. Louis. ``As a businessman in St. Louis, I realized we had blown an
opportunity with all of the screwing around.''
	Like many other football fans in the city, Heintz said he was turning
his hopes to luring an existing NFL franchise to St. Louis. Most such
rumors have concerned the Patriots, which are owned by St. Louisan James
Busch Orthwein, who has family ties to the city's famous Anheuser-Busch
brewery.


    
    
9.953Jaksonville ReactionPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 01 1993 15:4059
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Subject: Former mayor: ``I feel so warm. I feel so good''
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 16:27:07 PST

	JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (UPI) -- The darkhorse city of Jacksonville, once
an outsider in the race for an expansion NFL franchise, rejoiced Tuesday
when the northeast Florida city was awarded a team.
	A pep rally and celebration was scheduled for the Gator Bowl at 4 p.
m. Wednesday and was planned to last well into the evening.
	When customers were advised they would not be able to buy
commemorative T-shirts until they reached the stores Wednesday, hundreds
of them lined up at the manufacturer, Sportswear Express. They were
turned away because of contractual agreements.
	``We've lived this dream for 15 years,'' rejoiced former Mayor Jake
Godbolt, who started the drive for the franchise. ``I feel so elated, I
feel so warm, I feel so good. This is a wonderful moment.
	``We're not talking about crime, we're not talking about kids getting
in trouble, we're talking about something really happy, and God knows,
Jacksonville deserves this moment of happiness.''
	Jacksonville and Charlotte, N.C., awarded a team last month, will
join the NFL in 1995 to form a 30-team league.
	NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue announced the selection of
Jacksonville, which will be known as the Jaguars, after a meeting in
Rosemont, Ill. The investment group is headed by J. Wayne Weaver. The
group pulled out of the running for a franchise this year and then
announced it was back.
	Jacksonville has an existing facility in the 70,000-plus Gator Bowl,
but is the smallest television market of the five candidates that had
been seeking a team. It ranks 54th in the nation in that department. The
new group plans to invest $120 million to renovate the stadium.
	Weaver's partners include Jeb Bush, son of former President George
Bush; Jacksonville business executive Thomas Petway III; and former NFL
defensive back Deron Cherry.
	Former Baseball Commissioner Bowie Kuhn, who lives in Jacksonville,
said he thinks the arrival of an NFL team will change the complexion of
the city.
	``I think you can't say you're going to put Jacksonville on the map,
because it's been on the map in a big way,'' Kuhn said. ``But in a
major, major way, Jacksonville becomes a center that it has never been
before of national attention. It's going to mean a lot to business and
trade in this town.''
	Lindy Infante, a former Green Bay Packers' coach, said he wasn't
surprised.
	``Everybody said that this is an upset, but I really think the best
team won,'' he said. ``I never thought that Jacksonville would lose this
thing. A lot of people don't realize what a big shot in the arm for
Jacksonville this will be.''
	Season tickets will go on sale Wednesday morning and range from $150
to $700. In an effort earlier this year to show the area would support
the team, the would-be franchise owners sold 10,000 club seats at $1,500
each in eight days.
	``One of the reasons why we have this is because we sent a message to
the NFL that we would support the NFL,'' said Al Latimer, executive
director of the Jacksonville Sports Authority. ``It's time now to start
reaching for your wallet because we are going to count on that support.''


    
    
9.955PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 01 1993 16:127
9.956LAGUNA::MAY_BRAll products 100% buzzword compliantWed Dec 01 1993 16:175
    
    How about it the Rams moved to NE.  That would solve all the ownership
    problems.
    
    brews 
9.957even better idea16421::HEISERbut I *like* it!!!Wed Dec 01 1993 16:381
    How about they move the Cards there and give us the Pats?
9.959I'm not sure the NFL still won't get the pants sued off itNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 01 1993 17:0622
    
>   Mac, this way the NFL won't be the plaintiff in any lawsuits. 
    
    This may indeed be the case, I just don't know the details, but why?
    Okay, you've reportedly got some threats from a real small-time
    operator like Fran Murray, but what about the bigger picture with the
    cities themselves?  A month ago Jacksonville was voluntarily pulling 
    out of the expansion running.  If anything, it appears that they had 
    the least to lose by not getting a franchise.  St. Louis has already 
    nearly completed a stadium and has a bundle at stake.  Baltimore had 
    the plans and funding together to do so immediately as well as a 
    generally strong bid per the NFL requirements (they just weren't that 
    attractive as a city and media market in general, something the 
    expansion group had no control over).  Both of these cities have lost 
    NFL franchises and were counting on getting one back.  How does the 
    selection of Jacksonville leave the NFL with the best protection 
    against lawsuits from these cities as well as Memphis (another strong 
    bid and the favorite as replacement for St. Louis a month ago), the 
    potentially disastrous Patriots situation notwithstanding? 
    
    glenn
    
9.960PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 01 1993 17:444
9.962VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesWed Dec 01 1993 19:205
    	I like the Fran Murray approach.  I have no credibility, no money,
    but if somebody doesn't make me a millionaire real fast, litigation
    will follow.  He's the embodiment of the "American Dream" 90's style.
    
    				/Don
9.963NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 01 1993 19:5728
    Tommy, you may be right about that.  The selection of St. Louis could
    definitely give rise to the contention that the entire process was
    rigged.  Then again, it's my personal belief that Baltimore can make
    the same claim, that they were led on but were never really in
    contention.  I kept reading stuff about Baltimore like "they have 
    the money, they have the new stadium funding secured, they have the
    most impressive and most stable proposal, but the NFL doesn't want 
    football back in that market so close to Washington and Philadelphia".  
    I suspect this was the reason that Jacksonville was "encouraged" to 
    hang in there when they were willingly tossing in their hand-- the NFL 
    needed that safety valve to the St. Louis proposal.  I don't know if 
    these are justifiable grounds for a lawsuit or not, but then again the
    "justifiable" part never seems to have much to do with it.
    
    > I like the Fran Murray approach.  I have no credibility, no money,
    > but if somebody doesn't make me a millionaire real fast, litigation
    > will follow.  He's the embodiment of the "American Dream" 90's style.
     
    Yeah, I know.  This is the same guy who had half of Connecticut
    woodward to starboard side and then upon the mere scent of sham 
    somewhere else, promptly declared that "Hartford is dead.  St. Louis is 
    the deal".  Why does anyone ever allow the bastard to put his signature 
    on anything resembling a legal document?  Because he's some kind of 
    self-proclaimed "sports management expert"?
    
    glenn
    
9.964Lasted one out of the NorthEastCorridor turn off the lights.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 01 1993 19:589
    Awarding the franchise to yet another southern team is further evidence
    of demographic trends and the migration to the south that's taking
    place in the USA.  Currently the SouthEast is the strongest region
    economically, leading the country out of the recession.  Trends point
    to the population of Florida to continue to outpace the country, with
    expected growth rates of around 36% over a 10 year period.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.965Yeah, but Jax is still a dump... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 01 1993 19:591
    
9.966PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 01 1993 20:2018
9.968Go ahead, Chris, igKnorr the trend, stick your head in the sandNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 01 1993 20:2928
    
>    Mac, the next time I miss a point will be the first.  I'm legitimately
>    concerned about demographic trends and aim interested in how Waugamain 
>    can claim that the NFL is on a downward spiral despite sitting atop the 
>    polls as the number 1 SPORT in America.
>    
>    Sounds to me like he's spouting at the mouth with no supporting
>    evidence.
    
    No, it's a fack: NFL TV ratings are again on the decline for something 
    like the 5th year in a row.  You've got NBC making threats that they'll
    pull out unless they get a whole lot better deal than this one, and 
    ABC is also hurting with the dreadful MNF as of late (CBS with the 
    better-quality, larger-market NFC games is doing better).  You're
    talking about the lifeblood of the enterprise here.  Don't matter what 
    some cheap TV Guide poll says; the networks aren't happy with the 
    ratings, and the networks run the league.  You can remain at #1 on 
    paper and at the same time be on the decline.  It's just like with 
    baseball when they took their beating from TV at the same time they 
    were still #1 (and still are, I believe) in total revenues.
    
    Of course none of this has anything to do with the original point that 
    the games have become boring recently regardless of whatever fan bases 
    may have been built up over the years, the exact same point that ACChris 
    has never failed to make in favor of college hoops (#16) over the NBA (#2).
    
    glenn
    
9.967CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Wed Dec 01 1993 20:299
Okay, say that there are lawsuits against Orthwhine (or whomever) about moving
a franchise to St. Louis (or wherever).  Do you really think a judge could 
prevent them from moving?  If the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the 
best that the judge would do is award them a huge cash settlement.  To any group
with the Busch fortune in the background, money is no object.

This is what happens in American justice today.

And yes, Jax is a dump...
9.969GENRAL::WADEPull!Wed Dec 01 1993 20:538
    
    glenn,
    
    	"Jax" is not a dump.  "Jax" is the nastiest beer ever made!
    	It's made with the use of a flat rock and a few bovines somewhere
    	down south.
    
    Claybone
9.970QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyWed Dec 01 1993 21:197
      Yeh,  theres a real market down in Florida for the NFL.  Just look at
    how many games tampa sells out.  It won't be different with 'ville
    since they will be losers for the 1st 3-4 years or maybe like tampa,
    the last 16 years..........    The fish don't even have the satdium
    full that often...
    
      Tim
9.971PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 02 1993 12:5454
    Well, Tim, sounds like the Jaguars aren't having any trouble selling
    tickets so far:
    

    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by 1 Dec 93:
    
--------
Subject: Jaguars ticket sales overwhelm phones
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 93 16:20:02 PST
 
	JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (UPI) -- The new Jacksonville Jaguars were forced
to add telephones in their ticket office Wednesday because of thousands
of season ticket requests that started coming in when the switchboard
opened at 7:30 a.m.
	``We're very pleased and embarrassed and apologetic that our phone
lines are so difficult to get through on,'' said Jaguar President David
Seldin. ``That'a as a result of overwhelming demand. We're told that at
any one time, we have 2,000 to 3,000 people trying the line.''
	Seldin said they have sold so many tickets for the $100 deposit, they
haven't had a chance to count them.
	Callers have also asked about becoming team mascots and trying out as
players. One woman offered to run a contest to select the team's
cheerleaders.
	There was speculation that Florida Gator Coach Steve Spurrier will be
considered to lead Jaguars, but Spurrier said he is happy coaching at
the University of Florida and plans to stay. His contract runs to the
year 2000.
	Spurrier also has been mentioned as a candidate for the Charlotte
Panthers, the other expansion franchise which will begin play in 1995.
	During the drive to get the expansion franchise, the city promised
$121 million renovation of the Gator Bowl.
	During the construction, the annual Florida-Georgia game played in
the Gator Bowl will be played home and home.
	The 1994 game will be played in Gainesville, the first time the
series has been played at Florida Field since 1931. It is possible early
1995 Jacksonville Jaguars' games will be played in Gainesville if the
Gator Bowl is still unfinished.
	Team owners and officials, who were awarded the NFL expansion
franchise Tuesday, also spent the day planning for Wednesday night's
celebration in the Gator Bowl.
	Tailgate parties began at 4 p.m. and the Gator Bowl stadium was to
open at 5:30 p.m., complete with a Jaguar logo in the end zone. Owner J.
Wayne Weaver and other officials were to arrive an hour later as
thousands packed the bowl.
	Both Florida senators, Bob Graham and Connie Mack, also attended.
	Weaver received an enthusiastic welcome from fans when he arrived at
Jacksonville International Airport Wednesday night after NFL
Commissioner Paul Tagliabue announced the team's selection.
	About 200 fans were lined up outside one J.C. Penney store Wednesday
morning in search of Jaguars T-shirts.
	Store manager Craig Carr said they had sold 2,000 shirts at that
store Tuesday night and expected to sell 10,000 more by Thursday. Sales
have been limited to two shirts per customer.
    
9.972No, here's the difference, about $40M worth...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Dec 02 1993 13:419
    I think the Chicago Bulls are the biggest "Bought Team" of all time.
    Look at all the money that ingrate Michael Jordan made after the team
    became successful.  Now if the Bulls had won some championships 
    with Matt Wenstrom in their starting lineup in place of Jordan, now 
    *that* would have been a "Championship Team".
    
    glenn
    
9.973Bulls won with a team not with $$$$MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Dec 02 1993 14:0441
    But Michael Jordan was no where near the highest paid player in the
    NBA.  These young "SO called studs" Are coming in making more then
    jordan was ever paid by the NBA (or the bulls).
    
    Hey everyone can think what they want but I have no respect for any
    bought championship team.  Dallas won it all with a middle to low
    payroll.  They built a championship team with talant, great coaching
    and a great game plan.  Once the cap kicks in and teams can no longer
    buy a team and are forced to build them then theyll impress me.  This
    is just my opinion which shouldnt matter much.  -1 where on earth do
    you come up with 40M, take jordan's NBA salary for his whole carear and
    you might come up with 40M...
    
    Its hard to compare NBA with Football or baseball they can basically go
    out and play for the highest bidders.  Imagine what a jordan would be
    worth with full free agency and no cap in basketball.  There's
    proberbly 5-10 teams in the NBA right now that if you add jordan there
    an instant championship team.  You cant really do that in Football or
    Baseball.  You have to go out and sign multiple free agents for big
    bucks.  SO without out a cap the teams in the bigger markets will win
    a huge percentage of the time leaving the smaller market teams as
    basement dwellers.  Of course you can be in a big market and have a 
    stupid cheap front office for 20years and have as much success as the
    pats :-).  I cant wait to see some of these teams in 3 years or so
    when they cant just go out and steal or resign 10 pro bowlers and
    stay under the cap....
    
    If money was no object I could build the pats in a year or too no
    problem...  you could even buy away some talant thats already under
    contract if money was no issue.  This will never impress me.  Now if
    Pittsburg goes all the way this year, It would be very impressive,
    dont have have like one of the lowest payrolls :-).  
    
    Hey everyone has there own values, and anyone can jump on any bandwagon
    they want.  But the highest bidder wont earn my respect, a few
    individuals on those teams deserve respect but the organization as
    a whole.. Im not so sure...  This is just my opinion and I like to
    root for the underdog, hey Michael JOrdan retiring is great I can keep
    rooting for the bulls but there instant underdogs and I no longer have
    to worry about people thinking Im a band wagon jumper....
    								MairB
9.974TNPUBS::ALVEYDead Runners Society - Carpe ViamThu Dec 02 1993 14:181
they're their, Mair'
9.975CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdThu Dec 02 1993 14:2518
The best players are going to command the best bucks.   Once a player
or team has proven it is championship caliber, the salaries are going to
go up.

It's just like anything else.  If I produce the best chili, I can charge
more for it because people are willing to pay more for it.   Just because
it costs more doesn't make it any less good.

Same thing with a championship team.  

As for Jordan, he didn't need any more money from basketball anyway.
He was making more money than any human could reasonably need from his
other ventures.  Hell, for all his money, he could have paid the Bulls
to let him play -- but I guess ol' Mikey didn't love the game enough to
do that.....


'Saw
9.976Wake up, M Air! Sell the shoes, win the champeenships...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Dec 02 1993 14:2610
    
    Yeah, so Jordan got paid right from the top by Nike et. al. instead 
    of on the books of that Nike subsidiary, the NBA.  He still was 
    bought and paid for at $40M to continue to keep the Bulls afloat.  
    Real championships are won without the need for big-advertising-market 
    sneaker money!  Now if the Milwaukee Bucks win the championship, my
    values permit me to respect that...
    
    glenn
    
9.978Wasted too much time on this topic already...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Dec 02 1993 15:4640
    Im glad people keep bringing up MJ.  The Bulls went no where when
    it was just MJ.  And if MJ had demanded what he was worth they would
    have never built the team they did.  But Basketball has a cap and for
    the most part you cant just go out and pay anyone anything to sign
    them.  Jordan even renegotiated for a lesser contract so they could
    use that money to sign some other players (I beleive pippen).  And I
    cant get mad over a guy who signs for less money but then markets
    himself get a good agent, marketing rep and money manager.  Im shocked
    when I see these ex sports people going bankrupt.  1 Million would set
    me for life (If invested properly) I have no idea what these idiots
    do with there money.  
    
    Im just glad there finally going to have a cap.  I know some teams in
    the NBA are finding ways around the cap but it does seem like it keeps
    things down to earth.  I think the cap is too high, but then again they
    do play 82 games so if you pay them per game 4m in basketball is only
    48Kper game where as 4M in football is 250K per game.  Dallas will have
    a hard time because player will compare themselves to other at there
    position makeing x$ and want that much money.  But with the cap you
    cant pay emmitt, troy, Irvin and Norton a combined 10+mil and only have
    20 mil for the rest of the team.  It will be a rough process at start
    but when agents, owner and players realize they cant have the huge
    contract and success they'll start coming down to earth.
    
    I think all sports players are over paid, its not all there faults the
    owner were and are too greedy.  Why should they make Millions and the
    players get squat but I think its getting out of hand.  50players on
    each team with a cap of 25M would be more then enough thats an avg of
    31+K per game, pay the better players a little more and other's a
    little less and put more money into pensions etc so they can live after
    football.... But why cant a RB who gets bad knees after 5 years never
    have to work a real job ?  People always say oh they need more $$$
    Because there carear's are so short.  Lets see the average HARD working
    man makes 35K a year times 40Years of work so roughly 1.5 M, and these
    guys want twice that per year ? on average... Too much.  Put caps on
    all sports and keep the avg team salary at 500K to 1M per year per
    player, anything more is too much... Oh well enough, Ive wasted enough
    time on this topic... Bottom Line, you buy the best players and have
    the #1 Payroll in any sport, you better win it all, otherwise your 
    wasting your money...
9.979CSC32::GAULKEThu Dec 02 1993 15:538
    
    
     I've got a few caps, baseball and hub.. Find 'em everywhere...
    
     Had a few close calls gettin 'em too, stopping on the highway
    like that....
    
    
9.980PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 02 1993 15:5917
9.981Sheesh...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Dec 02 1993 16:0822
    Your right maybe 1.5M per year is way too high.  And maybe I dont know
    my math but you say the following 
    
        Jordan did not get less money.  He renegotiated his contract to get
        less per year, but he still ended up with the same amount of money
        if not more.
    Im confused here if he was going to get 4 or 5M for 3 years and then
    got 3 mil during that same time frame how did he make more ????? Are
    you saying like your boss comes up to you and gives you a 25% cut in
    pay but will let you work 30% longer you made out on the deal ???????
    Boy That makes sense...  And dont get stupid on me, many people slack
    there way thru school and never make anything of themselves and if they
    can only warrent minimum wage that's there choice.  But to demand more
    money in a year then most people make in a lifetime is greedy.  I
    really thought barry sandars would end up being the RB with the most
    class but looks like the ol might $$$ has crept into his bed as well.
    
    You know the market has a demand for more Drug Dealers, the money's
    pretty good as weel (I was trying to top your mcdonalds statement
    did I do good).
    
    							MairB
9.982Good stuffCSC32::GAULKEThu Dec 02 1993 16:2612
    
    
    re .980
    >>                                              .....Maybe we
    >>    should make sports stars earn minimum wage and let the people at
    >>    McDonald's make the millions.
    
    
     Kinda like Letterman last Friday? (day after Thanksgiving)
    That was the one with Ewing as one of the guests.
    
    
9.983PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 02 1993 16:5117
9.984Is this JD :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Dec 02 1993 17:4724
    Yes but He could have went else were and got the money up front and
    defered payments later.  If he was about money he could have demanded
    almost anything he wanted, especialy after Championship #1.  Chicago
    (the team, the city) made Alot more money off jordan then they could
    ever pay him so he would have been worth more then any current contract
    in the nba today.  He could have easily had 3-5 more years at this
    level (of course all players are 1 injury away from retiring).  He gave
    back money becasue the money wasnt important.  He invested and marketed
    himself to the best of his ability and many judged him becuase of it.
    He didnt take money out of his teamates pockets to put in his own, he
    did the opposite.  Emmitt, Barry Foster and soon Barry Sandars, Michael
    Irvin, Troy Aikman etc, etc, etc will demand huge contracts and with
    the cap where does the money come from there teamates pockets.  There
    all very marketable and if they played there cards right could easily
    make 5+M a year without taking from there teamates.  Does Emmitt,
    Aikman or Irvin work any harder in the Gym and on there game then some
    Special Teams Player, I doubt it.  Yet when they demand the big money
    the player's playing a less glorious position will lose money.  Very
    opposite to what Jordan did.  I bet there's not 1 bull player that
    would prefer a primadona (like shaq) over jordan.  
    
    And if you look back not once was I confused.... :-)
    
    							mairb
9.985PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 02 1993 18:1621
9.986CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdThu Dec 02 1993 18:2020
>    opposite to what Jordan did.  I bet there's not 1 bull player that
>    would prefer a primadona (like shaq) over jordan.  
    
You ought to hear what the Chicago beat reporters had to say about Jordan
and his relationship with some of the other players, and the folks in the
front office, and their opinions of him.

About a year ago there was a lot of controversy surrounding Jordan and
his relationships with other guys on the team and folks in the organization.
It got pretty decent airplay on WFAN, although you probably can't pull that
station in up there in Mass, as I have a hard time getting it sometimes
down here.


Your argument is down by the bow, listing heavily to starboard.  If I
were the Captain, I'd be seriously thinking about ordering "Abandon Ship"
at this point......


'Saw
9.987PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 02 1993 18:293
    Mike, if you really don't like sports that pay people to play them you
    really should start following other sports.  You can't possibly derive
    any pleasure from watching the NBA or the NFL.
9.988PTOVAX::JACOBThis space being disinfected!!!Thu Dec 02 1993 18:485
    Anobody know if ANthony Carter will play this weekend fer the Vikings
    er not??????????
    
    JaKe
    
9.989For how longQUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyThu Dec 02 1993 23:106
      Well me oh my Mac,  yeh they sell  now,  but when they start off
    losing games,  will the interest keep up?
    
      So I was wrong about the initial market, my only mistake (-)..
    
      Tim
9.990MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Dec 03 1993 01:099
    What was SF payroll when they one their first SB? Probably in
    the middle of the league. But once they gpot rewarded for
    winning they are no longer a championship team? I guess if
    the Cowboys win after the pay hikles they also won'tbe a championship
    team anymore??
    what a crock of ....
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.991NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Dec 03 1993 12:3422
    
    Can we get the official Chris igKnorr spin to SI's "spouting at the
    mouth" with their latest cover story, "Can the NFL Be Saved?".  Seems
    that every time Chris opens his mouth to slam someone, his very next
    step lands him in a huge pile of it.  Maybe we could harness this
    incredible talent Chris has to make a short-term killing in the stock
    market or something...
    
    FWIW, of the steps that were outlined in the article, the one to do
    away with completely free substitution is absolutely the most critical, 
    in my opinion.  All of the benefits to doing this were dead on, without 
    the cost of distasteful special rules to baby the QB or other gimmicks 
    to explicitly favor the offense over the defense: less specialization 
    requiring more endurance which would result in more "natural"
    breakdowns and hence more big plays and more offense, smaller but 
    better-conditioned all-around athletes, less injury, better recognition 
    of individual players.  Even strictly in principle, there's something 
    gone wrong in a sport where many of the key athletes are only 
    participating in a very small percentage of the game... 
    
    glenn
    
9.992PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Dec 03 1993 12:571
    How will less substitution lead to less injury?
9.993NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Dec 03 1993 13:1311
                     
>    How will less substitution lead to less injury?
    
    By placing the emphasis on better conditioned players, more well-rounded 
    players that are generally smaller in the trenches and maybe slightly 
    larger but slower outside of the trenches.  This argument is unproven 
    and I'd expect that it'd be the smallest benefit to disallowing free
    substitution, and the other reasons are better ones...
    
    glenn
    
9.994As usual, I'm right on the money.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Dec 03 1993 13:3416
    re: glenn
    
    Obviously your reading comprehension skills need improving, cause my
    note(s) regarding the NFL were supposed to drip with sarcasm.  The fact
    that a SPORT as dull and predictable as NFL football maintains the #1
    spot in the "polls" of popularity (while college hoops languishes at
    #16) amazes me, but then again, I remember being amazed that 'Three's
    Company' was the most popular TV show in America.
    
    For the record, I'll watch Get Smart re-runs before I'll watch Monday 
    Night Football, and I'd much prefer a rouzing game of 'Break The Ice'
    with my daughter before even thinking about turning on a Sunday NFL
    game.  Saturday afternoons can be a different story though ....
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.995PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Dec 03 1993 13:3711
9.996NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Dec 03 1993 13:396
    
    Now, now, Mac, in fairness I did ask for the "official spin", and Chris
    did not disappoint.  I'm happy...
    
    glenn
    
9.997MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Mon Dec 06 1993 00:366
    ouch 9-6 loss to the Colts. Jets seem to have real problems with the
    Colts. Steelers win when Parcells goes for a TD with 17 seconds left in
    the 4th instead of kicking a FG and going to OT.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.998CSC32::M_MACGREGORMon Dec 06 1993 18:2913
    
    The god *()&^ &*( tv stations in this (*&^ state all do the same @!@#
    stupid thing.  Three minutes left in the Raiders-Bills game, a game
    that is obviously going down to the wire in a close hard fought battle
    and they preempt it to show the ^&%$# Broncos game in its entirety. 
    "We will keep you posted on the score"  10 minutes later I found out
    the final score was 25-24 while NOTHING happened in the Broncos game
    except a nearly meaningless first few plays of the opening drive.
    
    At least my VAX books aren't orange.
    
    Marc
    
9.999CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 06 1993 18:3617
>    
>    The god *()&^ &*( tv stations in this (*&^ state all do the same @!@#
>    stupid thing.  Three minutes left in the Raiders-Bills game, a game
>    that is obviously going down to the wire in a close hard fought battle
>    and they preempt it to show the ^&%$# Broncos game in its entirety. 
>    "We will keep you posted on the score"  10 minutes later I found out
>    the final score was 25-24 while NOTHING happened in the Broncos game
>    except a nearly meaningless first few plays of the opening drive.
    
Wow, that's really strange.

Out here, they won't cut to the Giants at 4pm no matter WHO or what is
going on in the early game.  The never do that, and they could, easily
enough......

'Saw    

9.1000MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Mon Dec 06 1993 18:395
    I think it is part of the contract.  The primary market must see
    the entire game.  Hartford is a secondary market for the Giants.  
    The New York stations would cut in as the Denver station did.
    
    Mike
9.1001Home Team gets TV coverage no matter whatPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 06 1993 19:126
9.1002CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 07 1993 12:2921
>    
>    That's because you are in New England, not in New York, no matter how
>    much you wanna be.
>

Do me, Mac.

The only New York team I root for is the Giants.

Actually, I like it just fine where I am.  I get to see the Giants when
I want.  Our TV stations don't jerk us around like the ones up there
do when it comes to the Giants.

I can see the Celtics or the Knicks, and the Rangers, or the Whalers or
the Bruins on any given night (although my cable company tends to black out
MSG quite a bit).

All in all, I'm quite satisfied....


'Saw
9.1003{Still the team to beat}COMET::DUNCANSFri Dec 10 1993 21:3610
    
    
    To all those Cowboy fans out there, what happened in the second half 
    Monday night?   
    All so how about Emmit Smiths 172 yards rushing?
    
    
    
    Duncan
    
9.1004I wish the pats were on at 4 instead of 1...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Dec 15 1993 18:2511
    Last week 12 of the 14 games in the NFL were decided by a TD or less.
    This week there are 8 games that involve teams with playoff
    implications, going down the Home Stretch :-)
    
    BIG GAMES:
    	Buffalo AT Miami
    	Houston AT Pittsburg
    		And the pats will be on TV at 1pm which is when both of
    		these games will be played.  So Pats on NBC and CBS Cant
    		broadcast a game at 1pm....
    								Mab
9.1005PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 20 1993 13:0311
    Big news for the NFL this weekend.  FOX outbid CBS for the rights to
    broadcast the NFC on TV.  CBS is now scrambling to compete with NBC for
    the rights to the AFC.  Maybe SI's prediction of the demise of the NFL
    were premature.  CBS certainly has had a poor track record dealing with
    major sports over the years.  They passed on the NBA just before the
    league took off.  They overpaid and undercovered MLB.  Now they lost
    the NFL after 30 years.
    
    I hope NBC keeps the AFC.  My cable company only carries 1 CBS
    affiliate and they are subject to the blackout rules.  I get 3 NBC
    affiliates, one of which is outside of the blackout range.
9.1006LAGUNA::MAY_BRAll products 100% buzzword compliantMon Dec 20 1993 14:226
    
    I'm really surprised the league went with Fox.  I don't think they
    cover near as much of the US as CBS.  What will happen in the areas
    with no Fox networks?
    
    brews
9.1007PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 20 1993 14:337
9.1008CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 20 1993 14:4512
FOX will no doubt suck.

For my money, the CBS pairings, for the top games, were damned good.  
Now Fox will have a bunch of unknown wannabes, and we'll end up with stuff like
that team that was doing the TNT Sunday night broadcasts (pardon me
whilst I hurl).

Also, talk of CBS going after Monday night football.  Now THAT'd be
interesting....


Saw
9.1009They paid big for the privilege...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 20 1993 14:4912
>    I'm really surprised the league went with Fox.
    
    A 50% increase over the current rights fees and $100M/year more than
    the CBS bid ($395M to $295M) carries a lot of clout.  Since CBS and
    NBC were saying all along that they were not going to significantly
    increase their bids over the existing fees and were not bluffing, I 
    think it's obvious that Fox paid a bonus premium to pry the NFC away.  
    No one miscalculates that bad...
    
    glenn
    
9.1010WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNumber 3 Looms over FenwayMon Dec 20 1993 14:498
    
    
        ABC just signed a 4 year deal so I guess MNF stays on ABC.
    
    I'll bet that some of the CBS announcers go over to Fox.
    
    
    Chappy
9.1011PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 20 1993 14:5517
9.1012MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Mon Dec 20 1993 15:136
    The only question left is who gets the AFC - CBS or NBC.  I think
    the decision will be announced today.
    
    The season also goes back to 17 weeks - only one bye week per team.
    
    Mike
9.1013CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Dec 20 1993 15:155
>    
>    The season also goes back to 17 weeks - only one bye week per team.
>    

Great.  Now if we can only get it back to 16 weeks......8^)
9.1014VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDDrew &gt; Vinny &gt; BernieMon Dec 20 1993 15:216
    	Denny said that this FOX deal will mean that the channel will have
    a monopoly on all the Simpsons.  Bart, Homer, Lisa, Maggie, Marge and
    O.J.  Does this mean that "In Living Color" will now be the official NFL
    Super Bowl halftime show?
    
    				/Don                    
9.1015GWEN::ASHEI've got the kevorkaMon Dec 20 1993 15:372
    OJ's on NBC though...
    
9.1016SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesMon Dec 20 1993 17:468
	FOX won't have any problems with announcers/analysts. Either NBC or
CBS will be without football. Thus, won't need the announcers. Big problem
for FOX could be no Pat Summerall. Summerall, does tennis, golf, and other
things for CBS. While Madden does just football, will Madden go without
Summerall? Who knows maybe CBS will outbid NBC and it will be a mute point.

Ron
9.1017I know Murdoch's got $$$ to burn, but this is ridiculousTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Dec 20 1993 17:585
    Somebody's got to explain to me how a product that lost a company
    over $80 million this year is worth $100 million MORE to a competitor
    the following year!?!?!
    
    NAZZ
9.1018QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Dec 20 1993 17:597
      No Summerall will be fine.  Madden is ok,  but Summerall is suffering
    from age.  He forgets what he's talking about, and makes "bad calls".
    
      Did anyone catch the announcer for the Bear/Bronco game get on Ditkas
    case?  I was laughing.
    
      Tim
9.1019METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Dec 20 1993 18:4211
re: .1017

Fairly easy to explain. FOX is thought of as a weak-sister network; in addition
2 other companies (Paramount and Warner Brothers) have announced that they
want to start a network. By getting the NFC FOX has pulled themselves into
the big leagues and possibly pre-empted a 5th network. CBS wanted the NFL to
make money, FOX wants the exposure and is willing to pay a premium for it.

Think of it as going after market share first and profits later.

The Crazy Met
9.1020No more CBS?BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredMon Dec 20 1993 22:126

	NBC got the AFC contract.  I guess that this means that CBS is
	outta the NFL?

	Kevin
9.1021NBC ... what a bummerSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRDrew &gt; Vinny &gt; BernieTue Dec 21 1993 10:538
    
    	Not good.  I would have been happier if NBC didn't get the
    contract.  Only being able to pick up the C band with my dish means
    I will have to watch most games over the next 4 years in inverted
    video.  What a bummer.  Looks like I may be investing in a new horn
    to pick up K band.
    
    		Hal
9.1022The more game the merrierMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Dec 21 1993 11:257
    Im happy, my cable gets to NBC Stations (SpringField and Boston) and
    Im not positive but I beleive I get 2 Fox Affiliates as well.  I could
    have big time choices on which games to watch.  As it is a couple times
    this years I had an NBC and CBS game on and the pats on NBC springfiled
    all at the same time :-)  I need to buy/setup a few more TV's :-)
    
    								mab
9.1023CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 21 1993 12:4729
This was a BIG discussion on the FAN yesterday.

CBS is out in the cold.  Recently, they have lost MLB, NBA and now the
NFL.  As Mike Francesa said, "it's going to be a ghost town over there".

Basically CBS will be on in March for the NCAAs, and April for the Masters.
After that there will be a big drought until the US Open Tennis, then
they'll be back on around Christmas time.   Oh yeah, they'll do golf.


On the other hand, Fox is highly suspect in terms of doing a good job
covering football.  They've never done it before.  Chances are we'll end
up with something of the caliber of the TNT Sunday Night games.

Francesa postulated that the show the world they are serious, they have to
sign Madden.  


I'm pretty confident, that with a Fox affiliate in Hartford, we should
be seeing all the Giants games.  I can't believe that we wouldn't.


The ONLY good thing about CBS losing the contract is that we do NOT have
to see that big fat asshole ( and now his wife) who proclaims "I'm a BIG
fan"....



'Saw
9.1025SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesTue Dec 21 1993 13:2019
	What is even more shocking is that CBS bid higher than NBC for
the AFC. There is no stipulation in the contract that the Patriots have
to stay in New England. This was a clause in the last contract. So now the
NFL won't be violating the TV contract when the Pats move. When negotiating
with NBC about this claus. Tagliabue called up Weld to talk to him about
the Megaplex. Apparently if a Megaplex was going to be built. The claus
stating that the Pats have to stay in the New England TV market would have
been in the new contract. Weld couldn't guarantee the Megaplex so the
claus was taken out of the TV contract.
	Back to the CBS out bidding NBC. CBS did not make there bid until
Friday. NBC's deal was finalized on Thursday. I guess all bids had to be
in by Thursday. So even though CBS bid higher, they were pass the deadline.
FOX tv got caught on this dealine issue when bidding for MNF a few years
back. They missed the deadline, so they didn't get MNF. This year FOX
made bids for the NFC and the AFC. So they wouldn't miss the deadline. They
were granted the NFC, so they were ineligible for the AFC.

Ron
9.1026NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Dec 21 1993 13:2618
                                                 
> CBS is out in the cold.  Recently, they have lost MLB, NBA and now the
> NFL.  As Mike Francesa said, "it's going to be a ghost town over there".
    
    And maybe if they instead devote their energies to developing some 
    decent programming as opposed to the other networks they might even 
    make some real money for a change.  The only thing better than winning
    these contracts might be losing them...
    
    I'm skeptical of Fox, too.  We'll see, but I can foresee all sorts of
    possibilities around tacky promotional ideas (even by network sports
    standards) with the NFL.  At the risk of being called an old fuddydud, I
    still think most of Fox' programming is low-grade crap (revolutionary or 
    not) and the NFL will just be used as a major vehicle to peddle it...
    
    glenn
      
                                                                  
9.1027CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 21 1993 13:4017
>    
>    I'm skeptical of Fox, too.  We'll see, but I can foresee all sorts of
>    possibilities around tacky promotional ideas (even by network sports
>    standards) with the NFL.  At the risk of being called an old fuddydud, I
>    still think most of Fox' programming is low-grade crap (revolutionary or 
>    not) and the NFL will just be used as a major vehicle to peddle it...
    
I agree.

On WFAN yesterday, Francesa was laughing, saying that Fox's halftime
and pregame shows would probably give "A Current Affair" a run for its
money....


'Saw      
                                                                  

9.1028METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Dec 21 1993 13:418
Bart Simpson promoting the NFL games would be a much better idea than
the "I'm a big fan" dud.

FOX could hire lots of the CBS people. Many of the football-only types have
a clause in their CBS contracts that allows them to go elsewhere if
CBS is not broadcasting the NFL.

The Crazy Met
9.1029They're already at it....TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Tue Dec 21 1993 13:517
I've already got a T-shirt with Bart in a Browns uniform,
frantically waving his arms saying, "I'm open, Man!"
The legend beneath says "One Offensive Dude."

Preferable to the "Big Fan" IMO.

dr.a
9.1030GWEN::ASHEI've got the kevorkaTue Dec 21 1993 13:563
    USA Today article titled "CBS to 'downsize' after losing NFL.
    
    THey're left with golf, tennis, college hoop and the 94 Olympics.
9.1031Another Friday night flashback; Saw did a good impersonationNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Dec 21 1993 14:016
    
    The Simpsons are okay; I'm more worried about the Sawmain's favorite
    nose-picking guy though... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
9.1032CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdTue Dec 21 1993 14:0811
>    
>    The Simpsons are okay; I'm more worried about the Sawmain's favorite
>    nose-picking guy though... ;-)
>    

Huh-huh, huh-huh-huh.....

Butt-munch....
    
Huh-huh, huh-huh-huh.....

9.1033METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Dec 21 1993 14:543
wrong network, Glenn.

The Crazy Met
9.1034NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Dec 21 1993 15:0610
    
> wrong network, Glenn.
    
    That wasn't the guy(s) I was referring to.  If 'Sawmain could 
    ever get that hangover haze burned off it might yet come to him...
    
    ;-)
    
    glenn
    
9.1035'Sawmain here's a hint-well least I think soMETSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Dec 21 1993 15:083
Love and marriage, love and marriage, etc. ??

The Crazy Met
9.1036PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 21 1993 16:196
    Tagliabue was interviewed on Good Morning America this morning.  He
    said that the league went for FOX, not only for the money but because
    they feel that Fox can expand the league's fan base among women and
    young people.  They've allegedly done some football broadcasts for the
    WFL in Europe and the NFL liked their style.  They think Fox can do for
    the NFL what ABC did when they first started MNF.
9.1037PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 21 1993 16:596
    The owner of the Eagles has announced he is going to build a new
    stadium for his football franchise.  What makes this announcement so
    different from all those other owners announcing new stadia you ask? 
    The Iggles owner is not asking the politicians and citizens of
    Philadelphia to foot the bill.  The new stadium is going to be
    privately financed.  Orthwein and Tagliabue, please take note.
9.1038METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Dec 21 1993 17:123
Wasn't Joe Robbie Stadium privately financed??

The Crazy Met
9.1039GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Tue Dec 21 1993 18:3417
    If you think Braman is doing this for altruistic reasons, I have some
    swampland to sell you!
    
    The Eagles lease with the city (negotiated by Tose when he threatened
    to move the Eagles to Phoenix) gives the team the revenue from the
    luxury boxes until the year 2001. Bottom Line Braman sees that cash cow
    going away and wants to get major concessions from the city of
    Philadelphia, in the way of tax releif and free land, and he will build
    a stadium near the sports complex in south Philadelphia. This would
    give Norman more parjing $$, more concession stand $$, no rent and all
    of the luxury box $$. If norman didn't have the lease deal with
    Philadelphia, he's have already moved the team to Baltimore for the
    nicer stadium and sweetheart deal they would give him there. Make no
    mistake, Braman is not a saint by and stretch.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.1040GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Tue Dec 21 1993 18:357
    Also.....
    
    
    Don't believe it until it happens!!!!
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.1041METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Dec 21 1993 18:415
re: Eagles and stadium

didn't another Philly team, the 76ers, announce a plan to play in New Jersey?

The Crazy Met
9.1042GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Tue Dec 21 1993 18:4823
    re: the Sixers
    
    They announced that they plan to try to negotiate a deal for a new
    arena in Camden. NJ Gov. Jim Florio, with about 2 weeks left in his
    term, is doing the deal for NJ, but Gov-elect Christine Whitman will
    also need to approve any deal. Whitman doesn't seem to be leaning
    toward approving the deal. 
    
    Sixer owner Harold Katz had been working with Flyers owner Ed Snyder
    (owner of Spectacor, the largest arena management firm in the US) to
    build Spectrum II, a 20,000+ seat arena in S. Philadelphia, with a
    mall, hotel and connecting ramps into the existing Spectrum. That kind
    of facility would give Pgiladelphia a real shot at hosting some very
    large conventions and would be a big boost to the city. fFrom what I've
    read, Snyder's deal to Katz wasn't good enough for Harold, so he
    started looking elsewhere.
    
    I'm not convinced any of the local teams will have a new facility until
    they start digging a hole in the ground. The deal for Spectrum II was
    announced about 1 1/2 years ago.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.1043METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Dec 21 1993 18:503
Does Philly have enough hotel rooms to host a really large convention??

The Crazy Met
9.1044CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Tue Dec 21 1993 18:5911
re: 1042

So it sounds like Braman is using the NJ scheme as a bargaining chip with 
Snyder.  He's hoping the threat of lost rent by the Sixers will prompt his 
sweeten the deal, and the Sixers can stay in Philly.

Philly is a decent city, with historical aspects similar to Boston, but I still
don't see that there are enough conventions/trade shows/etc. to support what
all these major cities are doing in an attempt to bring them in.

=Bob=
9.1045PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 21 1993 20:104
    But Dennis, at least the Eagles' owner isn't trying to get the money to
    build his new stadium from the taxpayers like the Patriots and the NFL
    are trying to do with this Megaplex thing.  And, he's not threatening
    to move the Eagles out of Philly.  
9.1046GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Tue Dec 21 1993 21:5218
    re: -1
    
    Just wait.... Norman is the lowest of the low.
    
    re: Hotel Rooms
    
    The Spectrum II project had a hotel as part of it, and the complex is
    only about 10 minutes from the airport, with tons of rooms down there.
    When the Spectrum II was originally anounced, there was some talk of
    Philadelphia trying to host an Olympics and trying to get the political
    conventions. 
    
    BTW - Spectrum II would be built without public monies (except for the
    free land and tax concessions from the city, plus the loss of revenue
    from the exiting facility).
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.1047USCTR1::KINGWed Dec 22 1993 11:275
    J. Jacobs, owner of the Boston Bruins and Boston Garden, has ordered
    his people to get Patriots facts and figures from Goldman-Sachs to
    make a bid for the Football team...
    
    REK
9.1048METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Dec 22 1993 14:083
and if youze thought the Sullivan's were cheapos ....

The Crazy Met
9.1049VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolWed Dec 22 1993 15:428
    	For once I have to agree with Craze.  If Jacobs owns the team we
    can look forward to yearly ticket price increases, yearly salary
    battles with the players, and you'll never get your seat fixed if it's
    broken.  I assume Jeremy wants to buy the team with the understanding
    that the state of Massachusetts will give him the 700 million handout
    in the form of a SissyPlex.
    
    				/Don
9.1050guide to playoffsHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropTue Dec 28 1993 18:0857
NFL Playoff possibilities (from USA Today):

AFC EAST
	Buffalo at Indianapolis:
		clinched division; tied with Houston for homefield
		advantage throughout AFC playoffs; has edge based on 
		win over Oilers.
	Miami at New England:
		can clinch playoff berth with a victory.
	NY Jets at Houston:
		can clinch playoff berth with a victory plus a Raiders
		loss and a Pittsburgh victory OR loss by Miami.

AFC CENTRAL
	Houston vs NY Jets:
		clinched division; tied with Buffalo for homefield
		advantage throughout AFC playoffs.
	Pittsburgh vs Cleveland:
		can clinch playoff berth with a victory plus a Raider
		loss and Jets loss OR if Miami and Jets lose.

AFC WEST
	Kansas City vs Seatlle:
		clinced division.
	Denver at Raiders:
		clinched playoff berth.
	LA Raiders vs Denver:
		can clinch playoff berth with victory OR a loss plus
		a loss by Pittsburgh.

NFC EAST
	NY Giants vs Dallas:
		clinched playoff berth; can clinch division and home
		field advantage throughout NFC playoff with a victory. 
	Dallas at Giants:
		clinched playoff berth; can clinch division and home
		field advantage throughout NFC playoff with a victory.
	Philadelphia at San Francisco:
		can clinch playoff berth with victory plus losses by
		Minnesota and New Orleans.

NFC CENTRAL
	Detroit vs Green Bay:
		clinched playoff berth; can clinch division with a
		victory; division winner will host wild card playoff game. 
	Green Bay at Detroit:
		clinched playoff berth; can clinch division with a
		victory; division winner will host wild card playoff game.
	Minnesota at Washington:
		can clinch playoff berth with victory.

NFC WEST
	San Francisco vs Philadelphia:
		clinched division; will host divisional playoff game.
	New Orleans vs Cincinnati:
		can clinch playoff berth with a victory plus losses by
		Minnesota and Philadelphia.
9.1051MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Dec 28 1993 18:1211
>	Philadelphia at San Francisco:
>		can clinch playoff berth with victory plus losses by
>		Minnesota and New Orleans.

>	New Orleans vs Cincinnati:
>		can clinch playoff berth with a victory plus losses by
>		Minnesota and Philadelphia.


        What happens if Minnesota loses, and both New Orleans and Philadelphia
        win (highly unlikely scenario, I admit) ?
9.1052METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Dec 28 1993 18:204
Also, Miami can also get into the playoffs if they lose. What
scenario would that be?

The Crazy Met
9.1053CNTROL::CHILDSDan Reeves mental midgetTue Dec 28 1993 18:206
 given they just played one another wouldn't thay use head to head as the
 tiebreaker giving the nod to Philly......

 mike
 
9.1054I thinkHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropTue Dec 28 1993 19:4414
Re: New Orleans, Philadelphia, Minnesota

The wording of the description for the Saints implies that the only way
in for them is with losses by both the Vikings and the Eagles. Same goes
for the Eagles needing losses by both the Vikings and the Saints.

Minnesota could lose and still get in if'n Philadelphia and New Orleans
both also lose.

Re: Miami

They're in if'n the lose if the Jets and the Steelers also lose.

TTom
9.1055They wearin' bags in N'Awlins yet?CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 29 1993 00:006
    Be a damned crime if the 'Aints get in... What a choke job.
    
    Mora oughta be jettisoned.
    
    MikeL
    
9.1056Go Pack...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI still hate Barbie dolls!!!!Wed Dec 29 1993 13:310
9.1057GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Wed Dec 29 1993 14:049
    re: Minn., NO and Phila. tie
    
    It then goes to total point differential in conference games. The long
    and short is that the Eagles would need to beat the 49ers by alot of
    points to come up the wildcard. That would be only the 2nd time point
    differential will have been used to determine who goes to the playoffs.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.1058Pro Bowlers - No Jets,Pats,Colts,BengalsMIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Dec 29 1993 14:0651
NFC                                     AFC
---                                     ---
QB  Troy Aikman, Dallas                 QB  John Elway, Denver
    Steve Young, San Fransisco              Joe Montana, Kansas City
    Phil Simms, N.Y.Giants                  Warren Moon, Houston
RB  Emmitt Smith, Dallas                RB  Marcus Allen, Kansas City
    Barry Sanders, Detroit                  Thurman Thomas, Buffalo
    Jerome Bettis, L.A.Rams                 Keith Byars, Miami
    Daryl Johnston, Dallas                  
WR  Jerry Rice, San Fransisco           WR  Tim Brown, L.A.Raiders
    Michael Irvin, Dallas                   Anthony Miller, San Diego
    Sterling Sharpe, Green Bay              Irving Fryar, Miami
    Andre Rison, Atlanta                    Andre Reed, Buffalo
TE  Jay Novacek, Dallas                 TE  Shannon Sharpe, Denver
    Brent Jones, San Fransisco              Keith Jackson, Miami
T   Harris Barton, San Fransisco        T   Richmond Webb, Miami
    Erik Williams, Dallas                   Howard Ballard, Buffalo
    Jumbo Elliott, N.Y.Giants               John Alt, Kansas City
G   Nate Newton, Dallas                 G   Mike Munchak, Houston
    Randall McDaniel, Minnesota             Steve Wisniewski, L.A.Raiders
    Guy McIntyre, San Fransisco             Keith Sims, Miami
C   Jesse Sapolu, San Fransisco         C   Bruce Matthews, Houston
    Bart Oates, N.Y.Giants                  Dermontti Dawson, Pittsburgh

DE  Richard Dent, Chicago               DE  Bruce Smith, Buffalo
    Reggie White, Green Bay                 Neil Smith, Kansas City
    Chris Doleman, Minnesota                Leslie O'Neal, San Diego
DT  Sean Gilbert, L.A.Rams              DT  Cortez Kennedy, Seattle
    John Randle, Minnesota                  Ray Childress, Houston
    Russell Maryland, Dallas                Michael Dean Perry, Cleveland
OLB Rickey Jackson, New Orleans         OLB Derrick Thomas, Kansas City
    Renaldo Turnbull, New Orleans           Greg Lloyd, Pittsburgh
    Pat Swilling, Detroit                   Cornelius Bennett, Buffalo
ILB Hardy Nickerson, Tampa Bay          ILB Junior Seau, San Diego
    Ken Norton, Dallas                      Karl Mecklenberg, Denver
CB  Deion Sanders, Atlanta              CB  Ron Woodson, Pittsburgh
    Eric Allen, Philadelphia                Nate Odomes, Buffalo
    Donnell Woolford, Chicago               Terry McDaniel, L.A.Raiders
S   Mark Carrier, Chicago               S   Steve Atwater, Denver
    Tim McDonald, San Fransisco             Dennis Smith, Denver
    Thomas Everett, Dallas                  Eugene Robinson, Seattle

K   Norm Johnson, Atlanta               K   Gary Anderson, Pittsburgh
Pt  Rich Camarillo, Phoenix             Pt  Greg Montgomery, Houston
Ret Tyrone Hughes, New Orleans          Ret Eric Metcalf, Cleveland
ST  Elbert Shelley, Atlanta             ST  John Tasker, Buffalo

INJURED
-------
C   Mark Stepnoski, Dallas              RB  Barry Foster, Pittsburgh
                                        WR  Webster Slaughter, Houston
9.1059CNTROL::CHILDSDan Reeves mental midgetWed Dec 29 1993 14:217
 Fryar has about as much business being in the probowl as I do....Byars before
 Russell or Warren or Johnny Johnson is pretty lame too.

 I see Mark Collins got screwed again........

 mike
9.1060MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Dec 29 1993 14:258
> Fryar has about as much business being in the probowl as I do....Byars before
> Russell or Warren or Johnny Johnson is pretty lame too.
>
> I see Mark Collins got screwed again........

  Don't forget that for the first time, the fans had a voice in the selections,
  so you might see a few more less-achievers on the squad in the future than we
  have seen in the past.
9.1061Fryar deserves it based on performance alone...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Dec 29 1993 14:3317
    Ok all knowing one, who in the AFC deserve's to be in the pro bowl
    more then Fryar ?  A few notables would be Brian Blades SEA, then
    either Jeffries of Givins but neither had better season's then Fryar
    and they had moon healthy all year.  Jeffries and Givins combined for
    7TD's and 2 100yrd games (I dont have MNF box scores so they may have
    scored on a MNF game somewhere in there, same with Fryar and Miami).
    But Fryar had 6TD's and 2 100yrd games... So id say he had a better
    year then either of them (maybe both).  Blades had 3TD's and 2100yrd
    games....
    
    I know Pickens had a good year, but face it he plays for Cinncy...
    
    I just dont see any other WR's getting the nod hands down or any nod
    from anyone over Fryar.. (Unless your a fryar basher/hater then I guess
    crittendon should go over fryar)
    
    								mab
9.1062SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesWed Dec 29 1993 14:426
    
    	The fan ballots only counted as 1/3 of the total vote. Coaches were
    1/3 and the players were the other 1/3. So Fryar didn't get in just
    because of the fans.
    
    Ron
9.1063METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Dec 29 1993 15:224
a tie which included the Raiders and Miami could also be decided by
point differential.

The Crazy Met
9.1064VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolWed Dec 29 1993 15:316
    	The Pro Bowl vote goes to the players who get the most commercial
    endorsements (hence the plethora of Cowboys).  IRVING FRYAR is one of
    the very few deserving players and he's only going because Webster
    Slaughter got hurt.
    
    				/Don
9.1065MKFSA::LONGI know a survivor!Wed Dec 29 1993 17:155
	I'm more suprised at Marcus Allen's selection than Fryar's.



	billl
9.1066DECWET::METZGERAmerica's most beloved game show hostWed Dec 29 1993 17:4721
Why? He leads the AFC in touchdowns and is a fan and media favorite (Thanks to
every announcer mentioning what a year he is having after sitting on his butt
for the last 2 waiting for Uncle Al to stop burying the hatchet in his back).

The reason Byars is in thier is that they instituted a new position called
fullback so that their weren't 4  tailbacks selected and nobody to block for
them during the game (that nobody wants to play anyway)

Speaking of which...are they every going to do away with the game and just have
the teams selected and send them all to Hawaii to frolic on the beach and play 
that most demanding sport of volleyball? It seems like less  and less of the
players show up every year and opt instead for their annual post season surgery
appointments....

Mebbe they should just go straight into the superstars, battle of the network
stars or circus of the stars competition...

Metz

Michael Bates over Steve Tasker for special teams player any day....
9.1067METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Dec 29 1993 17:515
> I'm more suprised at Marcus Allen's selection than Fryar's.

Allen's still playing?? :-)

The Crazy Met
9.1068VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolWed Dec 29 1993 18:3210
    	Marcus Allen also appeared on HBO's First & Ten.  Serious
    qualifications.  Now with FOX in the picture you can expect the Pro
    Bowl selection to be more surreal with the football players who appear
    on Beverly Hills/Melrose Place/90210 to get serious consideration
    regardless of football abilities.  Looks like "The Boz" started in the
    league too early.  Gee, all we need to do now is get rid of those nasty
    outdoor stadiums and the soccerization of the sport will be complete. 
    8^(
    
    				/Don
9.1069MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Wed Dec 29 1993 22:2215
    Here are the AFC wild card possibilities if the Jets win on Sunday.
    
    Jets	Dolphins	Steelers	Raiders		Who gets in
    
    W		L		W		W		J,R
    W		L		L 		W		J,R
    W		L		W		L		J,R
    W		L		L		L		J,S
    W		W		L		L		D,R
    W		W		W		L		J,D
    W		W		W		W		D,R
    W		W		L		W		D,R
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1070MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Dec 30 1993 11:3819
>               <<< Note 9.1069 by MSE1::FRANCUS "Mets in '94" >>>
>
>    Here are the AFC wild card possibilities if the Jets win on Sunday.
>    
>    Jets	Dolphins	Steelers	Raiders		Who gets in
>    
>    W		L		W		W		J,R
>    W		L		L 		W		J,R
>    W		L		W		L		J,R
>    W		L		L		L		J,S
     The Steelers can't get in if they lose.

>    W		W		L		L		D,R
>    W		W		W		L		J,D
>    W		W		W		W		D,R
>    W		W		L		W		D,R
>    
>    The Crazy Met
    
9.1071HTHWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNumber 3 Looms over FenwayThu Dec 30 1993 11:508
    
    
    
        If the Stellers lose the Raiders are in!\
    :-)
    
    
    Chap
9.1072MKFSA::LONGI know a survivor!Thu Dec 30 1993 11:598
>> >    W		L		L		L		J,S
>>      The Steelers can't get in if they lose.


	I think this only works out if the Steelers win.


	billl
9.1073MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Dec 30 1993 14:214
    yeah thats right, my typo.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1074NFL ruling on union duesHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropThu Dec 30 1993 15:0885
Article: 7281
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.virginia+dc
Subject: Arbitrator rules for NFLPA against Redskins
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 93 17:39:36 PST
 
	NEW YORK (UPI) -- An arbitrator ruled Wednesday in favor of the
National Football League Players Association in its dispute with 35
members of the Washington Redskins who have failed to pay their union
dues.
	Labor arbitrator Herb Fishgold ruled that since the Redskins play
their games in RFK Stadium, they are subject to Washington, D.C., labor
laws.
	Members of the Redskins face suspension for their final game of the
regular season for not paying their annual union dues of $5,000 to the
NFLPA. The Redskins host the Minnesota Vikings on Friday.
	Players who have not paid their dues could be suspended by their
respective teams, who are not obligated to take action but face a
grievance from the NFLPA.
	However, Redskins tight end Terry Orr filed a lawsuit against the
NFLPA that since the Redskins practice and have their headquarters in
Virginia they should be subject to that state's right-to-work labor
laws. The suit will be heard Thursday in a circuit county court in
Virginia.
	``Labor arbitrator Herb Fishgold has issued a premature factual
finding,'' a statement released by the Redskins said. ``It is
inappropriate to do so at this time in our opinion because a hearing is
scheduled for Thursday, Dec. 30 in a circuit court in Loudoun County,
Va., before Judge Horn. The Washington Redskins are subject to the laws
of Virginia -- a right to work state.''
	If a player chooses not to join a union, the collective bargaining
agreement stipulates he must still pay a $5,000 service fee, except in
states with right-to-work labor laws. The laws affect eight NFL teams --
the Dallas Cowboys, Houston Oilers, Phoenix Cardinals, Tampa Bay
Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins, Denver Broncos, Atlanta Falcons and New
Orleans Saints.

Article: 7285
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football
Subject: Arbitrator's ruling may force some Redskins to sit out
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 93 8:10:45 PST
 
	WASHINGTON, D.C. (UPI) -- Several members of the Washington Redskins
may miss Friday's regular season finale against the Minnesota Vikings as
the result of an arbitration ruling for failing to pay union dues.
	An arbitrator ruled Wednesday in favor of the National Football
League Players Association in a dispute against 35 Redskins players for
not paying their annual union dues of $5,000.
	Thirty-five members of the Redskins have refused to pay the dues in
protest of the labor contract between the union and the owners. Several
of the 35 members are willing to forfeit a game's pay and not suit up
for Friday's game against the Vikings at RFK Stadium.
	If a player chooses not to join a union, the collective bargaining
agreement stipulates he still must pay a $5,000 service fee, except in
states with right-to-work labor laws. The laws affect eight NFL teams --
the Dallas Cowboys, Houston Oilers, Phoenix Cardinals, Tampa Bay
Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins, Denver Broncos, Atlanta Falcons and New
Orleans Saints.
	Labor arbitrator Herb Fishgold ruled that since the Redskins play
their games in RFK Stadium, they are subject to Washington, D.C., labor
laws.
	However, Redskins tight end Terry Orr filed a lawsuit against the
NFLPA claiming that since the Redskins practice and are headquartered in
Ashburn, Va., they are subject to Virginia's right-to-work labor laws.
The suit was to be heard Thursday in a circuit county court in Leesburg,
Va.
	Orr was joined by receiver Art Monk, defensive ends Charles Mann and
Al Noga and linebacker Carl Banks in choosing to forfeit a game's
paycheck rather than pay the union dues.
	Fishgold said he would not order the Redskins to suspend the players
until after the court hearing.
	If the ruling supports the arbitrator's decision and several members
of the Redskins refuse to play, it would provide a huge advantage for
Minnesota, which needs a win Friday to clinch an NFC playoff berth. If
the Vikings lose Friday, the Philadelphia Eagles and New Orleans Saints
would still be alive for a playoff berth.
	The union says players on the other 27 teams have paid their annual
dues.
	The Redskins issued the following statement on Wednesday's ruling:
	``Labor arbitrator Herb Fishgold has issued a premature factual
finding. It is inappropriate to do so at this time in our opinion
because a hearing is scheduled for Thursday, December 30th in a circuit
court in Loudoun County, Virginia before Judge Horn. The Washington
Redskins are subject to the laws of Virginia -- a right to work state.''
9.1075Praying fer a miraclePTOVAX::JACOBBearded once againSun Jan 02 1994 15:514
    The way it is in my paper, if the STEELERS win and any two of the Jets
    Raiders and Fish lose, the STEELERS are in.
    
    JaKe
9.1076MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Sun Jan 02 1994 22:5611
    Miami lost, Steelers won. Broncos had a 30-10 lead over the Raiders.
    Raiders scored a TD with no time left to tie. Broncos missed a FG in
    OT. Raiders kicked an FG to win.
    
    Jets-Oilers in  few minutes. Jets win they are in the playoffs. Oilers
    win, Steelers make the playoffs. Buffalo won to clinch home field for
    the playoffs; tonights game means nothing to Houston since they beat KC
    in a tie-breaker to get the bye. Interesting to see if Moon will play.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1077SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesMon Jan 03 1994 13:243
	The Patriots gave Jake 2 free gifts this year. They blew the
game againsts the steelers. Then beat the fish yesterday in OT.
9.1078MKFSA::LONGI know a survivor!Mon Jan 03 1994 13:278
	Yeah where is TCM with that spiffy new p-name JaKe got him for the
	New Year?

	I guess that makes TC* the "Sports All Time P-name Bet Looser".



	billl
9.1079METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Jan 03 1994 13:483
JaKe hasn't sent me the p_name yet.

The Crazy Met
9.1080:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNumber 3 Looms over FenwayMon Jan 03 1994 14:0913
    
    
       Likely story!!!!!!
    
    
           He told me too tell you to put
    
    
               " Jets, Mets, SUCK!!!"
    
    
    
    Chappy
9.1081CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Jan 03 1994 14:368
Did anyone catch the Letterman that had the top 10 drinks of 1993?

One of them was

		Seagrams 7, Mets 0


I was rolling.....
9.1082PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 03 1994 15:3016
9.1083PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 03 1994 15:376
9.1084Irving's return... unimpressive...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 03 1994 15:588
    
    Yes, how can the great IRVING FRYAR not be going to the playoffs again
    this year?  Nice hands on that big, wide-open 25-yarder when the chips
    were down in yesterday's game.  At least the Patriots have their draft
    picks to use in the long lonely offseason...
    
    glenn
      
9.1085QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Jan 03 1994 15:581
      Who is Ben Coates and Vincent Brown?
9.1086PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 03 1994 16:119
9.1087Okay, he's good, but let's cease with the moaning...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 03 1994 16:309
>    Yabbut, Glenn, you seem to forget the key catch Irving made (which put
>    him over the 1000 yard mark) in another Miami drive.
    
    Yeah, big deal, 3 catches, 41 yards, including the wide-open
    catch-and-run you mention.  Quick, somebody call Canton... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
9.1088Loved to see Shula sulk offCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Jan 03 1994 17:4912
    Keith Jackson, TE. World's biggest frontrunner.
    
    I was at yesterday's "happening" in Foxboro and he did his obnoxious
    celebrating after catching a 5 yd pass in the third quarter which
    got the 'Phins a first down near midfield (way to go Keith).
    
    A_course, he got injured later on and lied there on the field while
    some neighbors of mine in the stands urged Keith to get up and start
    celebratin'. Not too classy but considering it was Jackson... 8^)
    
    MikeL
    
9.1089QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Jan 03 1994 20:0811
      Wrongo Mac,  I know plenty about many players on other rosters.  I
    haven't seen 1 Patsies game this year, so didn't get to see any of that
    pro-bowl shoulda been talent.
    
      Look at Simon Fletcher.  He was snubbed again.  The only AFC player
    with more sacks than him over the past 3-4 years is Neil Smith, or so I
    saw in local rag (which isn't much to talk about)..
    
      Maybe next year....
    
      Tim
9.1090WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly CSG/AVS DTN:293-5983Mon Jan 03 1994 21:323
    
    AFC beats NFC in interconference play this year!
    
9.1091VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNoTeam-NoBudTue Jan 04 1994 15:183
    	But the NFC is going to win the Super Bowl, again.
    
    				/Don
9.1092METSNY::francusNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Tue Jan 04 1994 15:425
re: .1091

Don't be so sure about that /er.

The Crazy Met
9.1093VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNoTeam-NoBudTue Jan 04 1994 16:153
    	Want another week of an embarassing P-Name?
    
    				/Don
9.1094METSNY::francusNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Tue Jan 04 1994 16:174
How about we wait and see who actually is in the SB and what the spread is.
I seems to recall that you're real big about using the spread.

The Crazy Met
9.1095Jack Kent Cooke is hiring ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jan 04 1994 16:4810
    
    
    
    	Yabbut anybody wanna apply fore the head coach position of the
    Redskins?  I understand it's vacant.......
    
    I remain,
    foist with da nooz?
    Kev
    
9.1096FRETZ::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyTue Jan 04 1994 16:492
    Rumors around here are if Bugel gets axed, JKC will fire/demote Pettibone
    and hire him.
9.1097Norv TurnerCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Tue Jan 04 1994 16:535
I keep hearing rumors that Norv Turner, the Cowboys' O-coordinator,
is high on the list of candidates.  I sure hate to see him go, but
wish him well if he does (except when they play the Cowboys, of course).

Jerry
9.1098Pettibone firedHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropTue Jan 04 1994 18:2518
Article: 7331
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.virginia+dc,clari.sports.top
Subject: Petitbon fired as Redskins' coach
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 94 10:12:38 PST
 
	WASHINGTON (UPI) -- Richie Petitbon was fired Tuesday as coach of the
Washington Redskins.
	The Redskins said that Petitbon was dismissed Tuesday morning after a
meeting with club owner Jack Kent Cooke.
	Petitbon took over as coach of the Redskins this season following the
retirement of Joe Gibbs. Washington finished last in the National
Conference East with a 4-12 record, the club's worst finish since 1963.
	Washington had problems on offense all season and scored only 230
points, the second lowest total in the league behind the Los Angeles
Rams.
	Washington failed to score touchdowns in six games this season.
 ccccqqe
9.1100Snowed in herePTOVAX::JACOBBearded once againTue Jan 04 1994 19:057
    I say the Oilscum will advance to the SB fer the firsted tinme in their
    history, and will beat the 49ers, and Butthaid Ryan will win the fight that
    will be at halftime.
    
    JaKe
    
    
9.1101Glanville firedHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropTue Jan 04 1994 19:243
Jerry Glanville has been fired in Atlanta.

TTom
9.1102METSNY::francusNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Tue Jan 04 1994 19:4110
So was anyone else looney enough to watch the end of last nights
Eagles-49'ers game?

Would have been the first game in 4 years to end in a tie. 49'ers missed a
FG; Eagles missed a FG as time ran out; 49'ers were called for a roughing
the kicker penalty - which btw was after the kick was made. Eagles got one more
play and made the FG. Last thing either team wanted was OT, especially one that
lasted 15 minutes. wierd! at least in SF it was only 9:45 when the game ended.

The Crazy Met
9.1103Buddy Ryan speaksAKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 04 1994 19:518
    Ryan was quoted today on the "fracas"
    
    "I said my part about it last night and that's all I have to say"
    
    "Actions speak louder than words" (As to what he thought of Gilbride's
    play calling)
    
    
9.1104CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Jan 04 1994 20:379
    Didn't see the end Craze, but the Niners SwissChees "D" will
    be their undoing.. that and Steve Young's "chicken-bonin" it.
    
    And Buddy Ryan is a flaming idjit even if he can coach. Love to see
    him and Ditka go one round (dat's all it would take Iron Mike to put
    Buddy on queerstreet).
    
    MikeL
    
9.1105Ryan should pull his lower lip up over his haid and swallowELMAGO::BENBACANO more raises and a 30% paycutTue Jan 04 1994 20:432
    Gilbride, had he not been stopped, woulda ripped off Ryan's haid and
    S@%& down his neck.
9.1106Gilbreath a jerkCNTROL::CHILDSDan Reeves mental midgetWed Jan 05 1994 12:554
They ought to send Buddy to Canton.....

mikey
9.1107TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Wed Jan 05 1994 12:584
Why?
Is there a federal prison there?

dr.a
9.110849ers not so hot with watters on the bench...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Jan 05 1994 13:025
    The 49ers lost 3 of there last 4 games, not the way you want
    to head into the playoffs.  They Need Watters, maybe as much as
    dallas needs Emmitt.  How did SF do without watters this year
    records wise....
    							Mab
9.1109Native of OHIODELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Wed Jan 05 1994 14:293
    	No, the prison is in Mansfield, OH.
    
    	Scott
9.1110but then Reeves would blow the SBCNTROL::CHILDSDan Reeves mental midgetWed Jan 05 1994 14:457
 Watters is back, he scored a TD the other night. Seifert just needs to get
 his head out of his butt. He's been playing soft to protect his players.
 He better hope it doesn't backfire. Niners are scared to death of the Sowboys.
 Only team with a chance to flatten the tires on JJ's caddy is the Giants....

 mikey
9.1111GWEN::ASHEDetriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. ChampsWed Jan 05 1994 16:344
    Lions win their last 2.
    Niners lose 3 of 4.
    Giants lose their last 2...
    
9.1112DYPSS1::ROPERMAC IS BACK!Wed Jan 05 1994 16:386
 >>>Only team with a chance to flatten the tires on JJ's caddy is the Giants....
    
    That's a great commercial.  
    
    - Rope
    
9.1113CNTROL::CHILDSDan Reeves mental midgetWed Jan 05 1994 17:0610
 >>>Only team with a chance to flatten the tires on JJ's caddy is the Giants....
    
>>>    That's a great commercial.  
    
   just wish they'd throw JJ out of the driver's seat and let leon Lett
   drive....

 then we'd be in business    

9.1114PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 05 1994 18:204
9.1115DECWET::METZGERSleep deprivation is a good thing...Wed Jan 05 1994 22:1916
9ers defense couldn't stop a local high school team...Just like last year
they've outscored their opposition...Just like last yar the cowboys balanced
offense and defense will take them apart, if they play..

Rookie of the year was Jerome Bettis by a wide margin...I, for the life of me,
can't  see why he got the nod over Rick Mirer of the Chickenhawks. Mirereonly
missed 30 or  so snaps all season, learned a complex offense from square one,
improved the team dramatically and contributed more to his team in a position
that is much more  difficult than Bettis.

The differnce in mental ability required for QB and Rb are so vast in the NFL
that I can't see why Bettis won over Mirer...

Metz

9.1116CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Jan 05 1994 22:4110
    Geez, Bettis ROY, Mirer 2nd, Reggie Brooks 3rd??
    
    Ah, where's Holtz, ah want to talk with that main....   8^)
    
    BTW, Niners defense is averaging well over 4+ yards per carry
    agin the rush, one of the highest (if not the highest) in the NFL.
    Combine that with Young's flinchin', see ya early.
    
    MikeL
    
9.1117MSE1::FRANCUSNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Thu Jan 06 1994 02:405
    Thanks MikeL I was wondering what was taking you so long to comment on
    ROY.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1118Metz, you're just a big fat HOMER!!!!!!! ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Jan 06 1994 12:521
    
9.1119Playoff scheduleLUNER::GROVESThu Jan 06 1994 16:495
    
    Can someone enter the playoff schedule for this weekend up to Super
    Bowl.
    
      Jim
9.1120CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdThu Jan 06 1994 16:5322
>    
>    Can someone enter the playoff schedule for this weekend up to Super
>    Bowl.
    
I think that the weeks after this are somewhat determined by who wins
this week.


	This weekend I know


		Saturday 1pm	Detroit v Green Bay
		Saturday 4pm	Denver v LA Raiders

		Sunday   1pm	Minnesota v NY Giants
		Sunday   4pm	Pittsburgh v KC


Course I could be all wet....8^)


'Saw
9.1121LUNER::GROVESThu Jan 06 1994 17:069
    
    'Saw,
    
       Thanks for this weeks schedule, but I was looking for the entire
    schedule. I know it depends upon who wins, but I was lokking for that
    type of schedule. Ex: If G.B. wins, it plays Dallas and if Detroit wins
    it plays S.F......
    
    
9.1122CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdThu Jan 06 1994 17:1738
		Saturday 1pm	Detroit v Green Bay
		Saturday 4pm	Denver v LA Raiders

		Sunday   1pm	Minnesota v NY Giants
		Sunday   4pm	Pittsburgh v KC


Okay.  

Next week

	If Detroit wins:	{NY Giants or Minn} v Dallas
				Detroit   v San Fran

	If Green Bay wins
	and NY wins	:	Green bay v Dallas
				NY Giants v San Fran

	
	If Green Bay wins
	and Minn Wins   :	Minn v Dallas
				Green Bay v San Fran


	
	If KC wins		{Denver or LA} v Buffalo
				KC v. Houston


Don't know the seedings to figure the rest of it...


This is just a best guess....


'saw	

9.1123GWEN::ASHEDetriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. ChampsThu Jan 06 1994 18:422
    Det-GB is Sat. at 4...
    
9.1124PTOVAX::JACOBBearded once againThu Jan 06 1994 18:456
    The STEELERS .vs. KC is Saturday at 12:30.
    
    Schnorttt Schittt SChleppps
    
    JaKe
    
9.1125CAMONE::WAYYou can't polish a turdThu Jan 06 1994 18:543
Okay, so I made a mistake.  Sue me.

8^)
9.1126PTOVAX::JACOBBearded once againThu Jan 06 1994 18:547
    I'll have my attorney contact yer attorney.  Ya gots good insurance???? 
    We can split the proceeds if'n ya want!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
9.1127FRETZ::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyThu Jan 06 1994 19:001
9.1128PTOVAX::JACOBBearded once againThu Jan 06 1994 19:028
9.1129HTH :*)ANGLIN::WIERSBECKGolden Gopher hoops!Thu Jan 06 1994 19:037
    The Vikes-Giants game is 12:30 eastern on Sunday as well.
    
    Not looking to sue you Frank, just don't want anyone to miss the first
    quarter.
    
    
    Spud
9.1130VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNoTeam-NoBudThu Jan 06 1994 20:066
9.1131METSNY::francusNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Thu Jan 06 1994 20:158
I would go with

Detroit +1.5 over GB
Pittsburgh +8.5 over KC (but KC wins the game)
Denver +2 over LA
Minnesota +6.5 over NY (NY wins the game)

The Crazy Met
9.1132KC,GB,NYG,LA - using those spreadsAKOCOA::BREENThu Jan 06 1994 20:241
    
9.1134METSNY::francusNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Mon Jan 10 1994 12:544
Cowboys luck out with GB win. Now they only need to play NY or SF
and not both.

The Crazy Met
9.1136USCTR1::KINGMon Jan 10 1994 14:558
    2 things I would like to see changed in the NFL....
    
    1. Bring back the 2 point conversion...
    2. Move the yard markers back out ( I think that is what you call
    them), this will bring back the short side of the field and help stop
    so many field goals...
    
    REK
9.1137you forgot oneSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Mon Jan 10 1994 15:054
    
    	3....bring back instant replay!
    
    	hw
9.1138LAGUNA::MAY_BRMon Jan 10 1994 15:069
   >    So much for all of the brilliant ideas on how to improve pro
   > football.  Two weeks of truly exceptional games in a row and we still
   > have a bunch  more football to play. Obviously, all that was needed to
   > add excitement   was games with something big on the line which, of
   > course, will be the   case for the next three weeks. 
    
    I was thinking it was just another case of the SI cover jinx.  
    
    brews
9.1139CSC32::GAULKEMon Jan 10 1994 15:1038
    
    
     I don't the game needs to be changed.
    
     My opinion is the folks responsible are really looking
    for a way to prostitute the NFL to be more palatable for
    a TV presentation.
    
     It used to be teams had 3 timeouts per half, and that's when
    the networks went to commercials.
    
     Then, it was one TV timeout each half.
    
     I believe we now get 3 or 4 TV timeouts per half, along with 
    the teams timeouts.  Monday Night Football is atrocious about
    this. After a score of any kind, they go to commercials, come
    back to show the ensuing kickoff, only to go to back to a TV timeout.
    
     What we have now is a loss of continuation in the game, which
    is what most of us consider boring. It's start.stop.start.stop.start
    etc... 
    
      The only times we don't get the constant stoppage of play is when the
    game is a total blowout, and going to a commercial will cause viewers
    to say "might as well turn it off."
    
      Look for those in charge to add another TV timeout per half to 
    college hoops, perhaps more timeouts to college football 
    as well, and then complain that these games are boring as well.
    
      In addition to those problems, saturation of the market is 
    responsible as well. We now have NFL football all day and night on
    Sunday, and a game on Monday night. Saturdays and Thursday night
    we have college ball. That leaves us with Tuesdays, Wednesdays
    and Fridays with no football. Won't be long till we
    have some kind of games on Friday nite also.
    
      STeve 
9.1140CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 10 1994 15:1111
I think that they should go back to the 45 second play clock.  

Of any change they made that probably adversely affected the game more than
any other....


As the 2 point conversion, I don't believe that there ever was a 2point
conversion in the pros (perhaps in the old AFL) but not in the NFL....


'Saw
9.1141CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 10 1994 15:167
Anyone see the SNL skit on FOX doing football?  It was funny.

(That was only thing REMOTELY funny on this past episode.  It was the
lamest episode of SNL I've ever seen.  Even the Coffee Talk sketch sucked.


'Saw
9.1142PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 10 1994 15:364
9.1143PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 10 1994 15:493
    Anyone else see Offsides on the Comedy Central last night?  It's a
    collaboration between NFL Films and Comedy Central.  It wasn't
    outrageously funny, but it did show some great highlights.
9.1144SNL did suckOURGNG::RIGGENSales gets commisions we get &quot;JACK&quot;Mon Jan 10 1994 16:394
Like perry and John Madden doing a halftime show. "You just do understand me
old man". Richard Lewis and Don Rickles covering a game was funny as well. 

Jeff
9.1145QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Jan 10 1994 18:378
      Why bring back the 45 second clock?  It used to be 30 before 45. 
    Christensen kept bellyachen about it yesterday.  He played when it was
    30 seconds.
    
      Teams did ok with 30sec.  They just want 45 so they can bring in 8
    different people for 1 play....
    
      Tim
9.1146LAGUNA::MAY_BRMon Jan 10 1994 20:047
    
    Yabbut, I think they started the 30 second clock at a different time. 
    Didn't they wait until the ref spotted the ball before it began,
    whereas with the 40/45 second clock it is started when the previous
    play is whistled dead.
    
    brews
9.1147LAGUNA::MAY_BRMon Jan 10 1994 21:487
    
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't this year's playoffs have/had all of
    the teams who have lost the most SBs: Denver, Minny, Buffalo, Cowboys,
    Raiders?  Only other team that I can think of with multiple losses is
    Miami and Cinci.
    
    brews 
9.1148QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyTue Jan 11 1994 00:523
      re-2
    
      Your right, it was started when the ball is spotted...
9.1149Open up the darn game wiya...SALEM::STIGTue Jan 11 1994 11:546
    re .1136.  I agree Rick. I also think they should allow the one foot in
    bounds rule on the receiving end. This would open up the game more. I'm
    just sick of the low scoring (boring) games. The game NEEDS to be more
    exciting!!!
    
                    stig
9.1150Emmitt Smith named MVPPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 15:364
    Well, Emmit Smith may not have been named the MVP for the first half of
    the season (and I recall at least one person who said he didn't deserve
    it anyway), but Emmit came up with the one that counts -- the one
    awarded at the end of the season.
9.1152Teams have won without great RB too; maybe no such thingNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 11 1994 16:1817
    In Thurman Thomas the Bills were also supposedly bringing the best
    all-around back over the past three years, with the possible 
    exception of last year with Emmitt.  The Redskins and Giants certainly 
    didn't have anyone who was close to his equal.  You can't generalize
    and claim that a single player at either (or any) position is the one 
    most likely to be a "franchise player", if there even is such a thing
    (can a team have two "franchise" players"?-- this may be a semantical
    argument).  Obviously balance wins out.  But as opposed to other
    positions, I think you have to have a high-quality player at at least
    one of the positions of QB or RB.  No great statement here, otherwise
    you don't have an offense; but can you make this claim with any other
    two single positions on the field, like saying that you have to have a 
    left tackle and a middle linebacker?  I don't think so...

    glenn
     
9.1154Absolutely... it's only one player out of 22 positions...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 11 1994 17:0423
>     They may not have had any one person who was Thurman Thomas' equal but 
>     they accomplished the same thing with three players instead of one. The
>     Redskin's won it with a decnt Mark Rypien, a solid running game and
>     a great defense. Is there a pattern here? (HINT: running game and great
>     defense). Quarterback is an overrated position. 
    
    I agree with everything you've said but don't come to the same final
    conclusion on QBs (for the same reason that I thought that the Pats
    should draft Drew Bledsoe-- there were no great running backs
    available to them-- with the *one* very high pick they owned).  When 
    you establish this pattern by looking at one player, quarterback (it
    could be running back, for that matter) versus a defense and a running 
    game, you're comparing one position on the field against perhaps a dozen 
    standout players at various positions.  There may be some that believe 
    that a QB can win out against those odds but I'm not one of them.  Like
    I said, it may be semantics (overrated is relative to the level that
    you think QBs are rated), but QB is still a very important position in
    the NFL.  You don't have to have a great one but you have to have
    solid, consistent play at the position, the more productive the better...
    
    glenn
    
9.1155MKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursTue Jan 11 1994 18:598
	I get your point, Tommy, and I couldn't agree more.  Given the 
	choice, with all other things equal, of the best quarterback in 
	the league or the best running back in the league, I'll take 
	the RB anytime.  The solid defense is a must no matter which of 
	these two you have.


	billl
9.1157PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 19:145
  >> In Thurman Thomas the Bills were also supposedly bringing the best
  >> all-around back over the past three years, 
    
    And add in highly rated QB Jim Kelly and it makes you wonder why the
    Bills are 0-3 in the big one.
9.1158DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Tue Jan 11 1994 19:1515
and the 49ers won a myriad of super bowls with a great QB, great WR's and a
respectable defense...BFD....

The best team wins...and running backs are only as good as their offensive
line.  Do ya think Emmitt  Smith would be the MVP of the league if he was
running behind the line of the Colts or the Bengals? Is it coincidence that
Barry Foster's or Barry sanders backups can step in and have a couple of 100
yards games when the starters get hurt? 

Speaking of MVPs Did anybody catch Brews Smith mouthing off that he should have
been the defensive players of the year? What a pompous ass.....I'd like to see
a Buffalo - Dallas rematch this year with the same results...

Metz
9.1160NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 11 1994 20:0525
                                  
  >> (overrated is relative to the level that you think QBs are rated), 
  >
  >   One need only look at what players at various positions are paid 
  >   to see where QBs are rated. Smith had to scrape to get close to
  >   what he's worth. Jones is already bending over backwards for Aikman.
  >   QBs have always been the highest paid players on the field.
    
    Yeah, this much is very true, and if you go by salary it's unfair.  
    Emmitt Smith got screwed over good by Jerry Jones, and I don't 
    believe for a minute that this $40M lifetime contract that Aikman 
    signed was entirely the result of the new TV deal.
    
    I wasn't thinking of this strictly in terms of Smith vs. Aikman, but I
    do think you have to give Aikman his due.  They're both great players
    and I don't think the Cowboys win it all without either.  I can't go
    along with the generalization that it's been the AFC teams with the
    superior QBs in recent Super Bowls, though, not even with Aikman vs. 
    Kelly and certainly not all those years of Montana vs. anybody.  When
    you look at what he's had to work with and what he's produced when the
    pressure has fallen on him, Jim Kelly, sure, he's overrated (at least 
    Elway has some right to the excuse that he's had to do it all).
    
    glenn
    
9.1161DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Tue Jan 11 1994 20:0619
respectable, adequate, whatever...The point still remains that the best team
wins....

The reasons QB's get so much more $$$ than running backs is because they are
required to think. The Qb is in charge of the team, has to read the defense,
decide what reciever to throw the ball to and avoid mistakes. It's a hell of a
lot more responsibility than getting the ball  handed to you and then trying to
avoid being tackled...

A Qb that avoids mistakes is almost as valuable as one that makes great plays.
One that can execute mentally as well as athletically is worth every penney
they get payed in inflated NFL sports dollars...

With added responsibility comes added bonus ($$$$$$)....Uor paper had a good
article a few weeks ago on the number of decisions an NFL QB has to make each
play (esp passing situations)...It's pretty staggering and I'm amazed that more
passes don't get picked off due to a miscommunication between receiver and QB.

Metz
9.1162Eligible UnderclassmenPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 12 1994 13:3946
       <<< LMOADM::LP$DISK:[NOTES$LIBRARY]NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                      -< New England Patriots (volume V) >-
================================================================================
Note 54.416                         NFL Draft                         416 of 416
ONE800::AREANO                                       38 lines  12-JAN-1994 08:59
                   -< final list of eligible underclassmen >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full list of underclassmen:

Clingler, Jimmy		QB	Houston
Dilfer, Trent		QB	Fresno State
Shuler, Heath		QB	Tennessee

Bates, Mario		RB	Arizona State
Bennett, Donnell	RB	Miami
Bostic, James		RB	Auburn
Faulk, Marshall		RB	S.D. State
Floyd, William		FB	Florida State
Hill, Greg		RB	Texas A&M
Jones, Calvin		RB	Nebraska
Levy, Charles		RB	Arizona
McFadden, Dwight	RB	USC
Morris, Byron		RB	Texas Tech
Warren, Lamont		RB	Colorado
Woodard, Rodney		RB	West Virginia

Lewis, Thomas		WR	Indiana
Palmer, David		WR	Alabama
Scott, Darnay		WR	S.D. State

Ofodile, A.J.		TE	Missouri

Hegamin, George		OT	N.C. State

Adams, Sam		DE	Texas A&M
Bowens, Tim		DT	Mississippi
Walker, Bruce		DT	UCLA
Johnson, Joe		DE	Louisville
Wilkinson, Dan		DE	Ohio State

Miller, Jamir		LB	UCLA

Harrison, Rodney	DB	Western Illinois
Goodwin, Marvin		S	UCLA
Sawyer, Corey		CB	Florida State
    
9.1164Misc.STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Jan 12 1994 14:5519
      So Stokes at UCLA is staying???  Too bad for New England.  If
      I was them, I'd have nabbed him in a second.
    
      Tom, I think you underestimate what a QB needs to know (at least
      in some systems).
    
      I know that Brett Favre said he has something like 136 pass
      plays to know and he sometimes feels like its overwhelming.  I
      know that the 49'er offense takes years to learn and a watered
      down version is used at first because its simply too much to
      take in in one year.
    
      While I appreciate that its a gift to be able to see laterally
      and choose the right hole, I'd still say that it is quite demanding
      to have to read a defense and sometimes check a first, second, and
      third potential receiver - all in ~2.7 seconds.  Its a kind of
      skill some qb's never master.
    
                                              Tony
9.1165Give Steve Young his just dueTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthWed Jan 12 1994 15:438
    Tommy, I also agree with your basic premise, but I see no reason for
    you to denigrate Steve Young's accomplishments by calling him a
    journeyman quarterback.  He was, after all, the NFL's VMP in 1992 and
    had another outstanding season this year.  Babe Laufenberg is a
    journeyman quarterback, as is Hugh Millen, but certainly not Steve
    Young.
    
    NAZZ
9.1166VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWhitewater/WhitewashWed Jan 12 1994 15:443
    	Steve Young was in his element in the USFL.
    
    				/Don
9.1168QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyWed Jan 12 1994 16:006
      Young played only at Tampa Bay in the NFL, before he got splinter
    butt at San Fran.
    
      Hth
    
      Tim
9.1169PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 12 1994 16:039
9.1170crybabie extrordinaireMKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursWed Jan 12 1994 16:0710
>>      So Stokes at UCLA is staying???  Too bad for New England.  If
>>      I was them, I'd have nabbed him in a second.

	Tony, is Stokes #18 (or was it #19)?  I was really getting fed
	up with his CONSTANT moaning and groaning after every dropped
	pass in the Rose Bowl.  I kinda wished that his coach would grab 
	ahold of his face mask and give him the old "Woody Hayes" treatment.


	billl
9.1171A Great QB/RB combo seems to be the trick :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Jan 12 1994 16:0928
    Both the RB and QB are important but I still cant say that Dallas
    would be better off with Emmitt over Aikman.  Look at some of the
    other top RB's in the league, Thomas, he has kelly and its been
    enough to get to the big dance but not win.  Of course Emmitt/aikman
    are a little better then Thomas/Kelly.  Then The Barry's both play
    on teams that have had QB problems and neither has got anywere in
    the playoffs.  The Giants are doing it with Hampton/Simms.  The Best
    Teams seem to have a great QB/RB Combination.  If you had to rate the
    top 5 or 6 teams would they be
    
    		Aikman/Emmitt
    		Young/Watters
    		Simms/Hampton
    		Kelly/Thomas
    		Moon/Brown (was white)
    		Montana/Allen
    
    GB doesnt have the RB to go with the QB neither does the Raiders, does
    anyone feel that either RB or the Raiders have a legit shot at going
    all the way.  Actually of you look at the above list every team also
    has 1 or 2 great WR's, and some pretty decent TE's as well.... You need
    the all around package.  4 or 5 of the abover teams have a great shot
    at making it too and winning the SB and they all have good all around
    teams....
    
    WIll be intresting to see who (and how) teams go down this weekend...
    
    								MaB
9.1172Got one on my deskCSC32::GAULKEWed Jan 12 1994 16:0918
9.1173There may be other options at WR...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 12 1994 16:2225
>	Tony, is Stokes #18 (or was it #19)?  I was really getting fed
>	up with his CONSTANT moaning and groaning after every dropped
>	pass in the Rose Bowl.  I kinda wished that his coach would grab 
>	ahold of his face mask and give him the old "Woody Hayes" treatment.

    He took a stupid penalty on UCLA's first drive, too, perhaps costing 
    them a chance at a TD by taking a swipe at a guy.  You never know; maybe
    staying another year isn't a bad idea for Stokes.  I read a feature on
    Stokes earlier this year where it was mentioned that he barely has one
    year's experience (didn't even play much last year) and one of the
    reasons the coaches gave for that was his immaturity.  He really has
    been a surprise, not playing much in high school and not being highly
    recruited, and almost came out of nowhere this season.  I would have 
    guessed that with Stokes' kind of demonstrated immense talent, college 
    experience would be a very secondary consideration and that he'd have 
    come out, but then again sometimes talent alone doesn't make it, either.
    
    Another guy worth watching is USC's WR Johnny Morton, who outgained 
    Stokes by almost 300 yards in the Pac-10 this year.  He's not as big 
    as Stokes (who is?) but he's faster.  Not sure that he's worth a #4 
    pick, though...
    
    glenn
    
9.1174Sanders and His Incredible SkillSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Jan 12 1994 16:2534
      Billl,
    
        #18.  Yeah, he whined like mad.  The first time was his first 
        reception, but I'm not sure his complaining was excessive as
        it almost looked to me like the Wisconsin defensive back tried
        to wrench his leg after pulling Stokes by it out of bounds.
    
        But, yes, he did whine quite a bit.  
    
        Stokes has it all though.  The only question mark might be
        durability.  He looks pretty wiry.
    
      Tom,
    
        I don't know what it is that enables one to be able to do what
        Sanders can do.  I would call it genius of some nature.  He's
        the only guy that I've seen save perhaps Eric Metcalfe (though
        much less strong) who has moves like my favorite running back
        of all time - Gayle Sayers.  Man, can Sanders move!
    
        I could literally puke (well, I'm exagerrating) that the Pack
        lost him in the draft.  Its old news, but they HAD to win their
        last game and lose their rights to Aikmen.  They went on to draft
        Mandarich and we know the rest; Lions - Sanders, Chiefs - Derrick
        Thomas.
    
        To be fair, George Young said that any GM that says they would
        not have drafted Mandarich when Green Bay did would be lying 
        through their teeth.
    
        But...the Pack could have had Sanders and instead they have someone
        who ain't around anymore.
    
                                                       Tony
9.1176What does Brown think he is?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 12 1994 16:5313
    
    > They'll either take one later in the draft or go the free agent 
    > route (Tim Brown, please!).
    
    Al Davis says that he doesn't understand all the talk around Tim Brown
    because he's been designated as a transition player, is only a
    restricted free agent and that they'll match any offers.  I don't
    understand the system well enough to know why there's confusion here.
    Maybe Davis is playing fast and loose with the rules again?
    
    glenn
     
                            
9.1177Machete my patootieAKOCOA::BREENWed Jan 12 1994 16:554
    Did Marshall Faulk officially declare.  I saw one item which said he
    hadn't made it official and I never caught, from the various list,
    exactly when he did officially send the letter.
    
9.1178CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Jan 12 1994 18:0911
I had this scary thought.....

There's a bunch of commercials out there, for some product that hasn't
mananged to catch my attention, featuring Downtown Julie Brown and
different football players.

Whenever I see those commercials, I get this fear that I'm seeing a 
preview of Fox's NFC coverage.....


'Saw
9.1179It's already here, Saw... Fox will have to top it...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 12 1994 19:1417
    
> I had this scary thought.....
>
> There's a bunch of commercials out there, for some product that hasn't
> mananged to catch my attention, featuring Downtown Julie Brown and
> different football players.
>
> Whenever I see those commercials, I get this fear that I'm seeing a 
> preview of Fox's NFC coverage.....
    
    Unfortunately, it seems as if she's under contract with ABC/ESPN and 
    is already doing taped halftime interviews for Sunday and Monday
    nights.  "Weww, Seth, evewyone says that you're a tough guy... but is
    there a sensitive side to Seth Joyner underneath?"  Nauseating...
    
    glenn
    
9.1180PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 12 1994 19:584
9.1181PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 12 1994 20:137
9.1182LAGUNA::MAY_BRJWBobbit&amp;DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShortFri Jan 14 1994 13:354
    Anyone know what time the SB starts?  I gotta go to LA that Sunday and
    need to make plane reservations.
    
    brews
9.1183CSTEAM::FARLEYFri Jan 14 1994 13:387
    
    
    Yabbut isn't the kick-off historically either ~6:00PM EST or ~8:00EST?
    
    does that help?
    
    
9.1184CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 13:4112
>    Yabbut isn't the kick-off historically either ~6:00PM EST or ~8:00EST?
>    
>    does that help?
    

Kev, you can't use the term "historically" or "history" in this conference
without your opinion being called into serious question.....

hth,
'Saw
    

9.1185What are you? Playing StFM????? Who says I can't? ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYFri Jan 14 1994 13:431
    
9.1186CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 13:486
>          -< What are you? Playing StFM????? Who says I can't?  ;^) >-

I'm just looking out for your best interests......8^)

    

9.1187This is good a place as any for picks (pool???)AKOCOA::BREENFri Jan 14 1994 13:5319
    Well here are my four picks - I can't find where last weeks were
    entered; probably in the softball note
    
    Buff giving 6.5
    Giants with 8
    Green bay w 14
    KC  with    7
    
    It's going to be Colllllllllllld in buff; I was there 12/26 (not at
    jets game, just drove by)(*)
    
    Houston seems to have a problem with receivers.
    
    49ers defense is suspect - can they keep g'nts off the field?
    
    14 is high, depends on gb mistakes or lack thereof
    
    (*)  Has it ever been noted that province of Ontario has a sports
    lottery?
9.1189MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 14 1994 15:074
    Super Bowl starts at 6PM EST
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1190CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 15:123
>    Super Bowl starts at 6PM EST
    
But the pre-game festivities probably start around noon.....8^)
9.1191LAGUNA::MAY_BRJWBobbit&amp;DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShortFri Jan 14 1994 15:155
    
    Thanks guys.  Guess I'm spending the SB in a hotel with a bunch of DEC
    employees.  Oh boy.
    
    brews
9.1192SKEWED::MCKAYFri Jan 14 1994 15:185
    correction:
    	I guess you'll be spending the super bowl in the hotel LOUNGE
    with a bunch of DEc employees!!!!
    
    Jimbo
9.1193CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 15:2012
>    	I guess you'll be spending the super bowl in the hotel LOUNGE
>    with a bunch of DEc employees!!!!
>    
>    Jimbo

If I know Brews, what will happen is that Hooters will be having a convention
in that hotel, that week.  He'll be in the hotel Lounge with
Hooters Girls and DEC Employees.....


'Saw

9.1194MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 14 1994 15:594
    Does Brews next door neighbor work at Hooters? :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1195More predictionsCADSYS::CAVEFri Jan 14 1994 16:0629
	Houston (-7)

		The Oilers are playing excellent ball and their pressure D
	will knock Montana out before halftime.

	Giants (+7)

		I can invision a straightout Giant victory with their offensive
	line dominating the game and keeping the 49ers offense off the field.
	Although, the injury to the Giants CB (forgot his name) could be a
	big factor.

	Bill (+10)

		I would normally take the Raiders with their strong D and speedy
	receivers but it will be FRIGID this week-end.  Do they play Sat or
	Sun.  I know on Sunday the temps in Boston will be 0-10 with wind chill
	of below 40.  The cold and wind will eliminate the passing game and
	the Raiders Ofensive will stall.

	Packers (+14)

		Only because the Cowboys are banged up and 14 is a lot of
	points.



Alan
9.1196VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDPatriot Games?Fri Jan 14 1994 16:086
    	I like all the favorites this weekend with one exception.  Eight
    points is way to much to be giving DAN REEVES and the Giants.  By the
    way Brews, glad to see you shed that baby blue image and pay off your
    P-Name bet.  Congrats!
    
    				/Don
9.1197LAGUNA::MAY_BRJWBobbit&amp;DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShortFri Jan 14 1994 16:3710
 >    By the way Brews, glad to see you shed that baby blue image and pay
 >   off your P-Name bet.  Congrats!
    
    I've been busy this week, and haven't been able to note as often as
    usual, so I may have to keep the pname for a bit longer than a week, if
    that's OK with you.
    
    brews
    
    
9.1198No problem B.O.S.S.VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDPatriot Games?Fri Jan 14 1994 16:571
    
9.1199LAGUNA::MAY_BRJWBobbit&amp;DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShortFri Jan 14 1994 17:054
    
    Thanks, I'm just trying to shed my UNC ways.
    
    brews
9.1200MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 14 1994 17:405
    Imus' brother Fred made football picks this morning. Only memorable one
    was Oilers over KC. "Montana is missing his 2 weapons, Rice and Tayolr"
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1201Even at his age, Dean still gits up for big games.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 14 1994 17:458
    How are Bobbit & Deano coming up "short" brews?  Dean just won his 2nd
    Title and, as far as we know, Bobbit is functioning normally again and
    will in all likelihood git to see his wife sent to the Big House.
    
    Haw!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.1202I would think Dean & Friends would be lying low this weekAKOCOA::BREENFri Jan 14 1994 18:261
    
9.1203VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDPatriot Games?Fri Jan 14 1994 18:334
    	Hey ACC is right.  Deano did display a Bobbit like response the
    other night.
    
    				/Don
9.1204you'll be sued fer slander!!CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 14 1994 18:405
    Ya mean he went out with the Marines and drank B52's and came home
    to Mrs Dean and.....tsk tsk. Sacrilege Slash!!
    
    MikeL
    
9.1205not that I've ever had any...MKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursFri Jan 14 1994 19:0912
>>  Ya mean he went out with the Marines and drank B52's and came home

	Now that's one mean thing to spend the night slamming down....
	(the B52's not the Marines)

	Kahlua, Baileys & 151 Rum all layered in a shot glass, put the
	whole mess in your mouth.  Don't forget to swish before swallowing!

	Yahooo!


	billl
9.1206GWEN::ASHENo one here 'cept us chickens...Fri Jan 14 1994 19:452
    I may be out in California SB Sunday too..
    
9.1207LAGUNA::MAY_BRJWBobbit&amp;DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShortFri Jan 14 1994 22:206
    
    Northern or Southern?
    
    You're younger than me?  sheeesh, I'd never guess.
    
    brews
9.1208SALEM::DODAOk, jokes over, bring back BushSun Jan 16 1994 22:433
Has a Run N' Shoot team ever won a playoff game?

daryll
9.1209Thoughts on the week-endCADSYS::CAVESun Jan 16 1994 23:2321
	I would have laid a goose egg on my picks if not for the useless
last minute TD by the Packers.  I was very surprised by the 49ers.  They
were the best team by far this week-end and looked like the old 49er teams
with great balance on both sides of the ball.  It will be a very interesting
game next week in Dallas.

	The KC game was another big surprise for me.  Although I'm a big
Montana fan, I hope we all realize KC won because of their defense.  In fact,
I feel Montana did NOT play well regardless of his reasonable numbers.  He
threw two bad interceptions and underthrew open receivers on the bomb three
times.  He also underthrew Birden? on third TD but the receiver turned back to
make an excellent catch.  The final big play was the reception by the tight
end and a critical 3rd and 1 (KC had a 1 point lead with 2 1/2 minutes left)
where Montana was hit as he threw it and put it up for grabs.  To his
credit he did have a perfectly thrown bomb dropped that would have been a
sure TD.  I was suprised they didn't use Allen more (15 carries/75 yards but
only 1 or 2 receptions).  He seemed to be effective when they gave him a
chance and that final TD was beautiful.


9.1210MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Mon Jan 17 1994 03:5711
    I'm pretty sure Detroit won a game with the Run 'n shoot.
    
    Both the Packers and KC had chances in the 1st half of their games. KC
    was good enought to make up for it in the 2nd half. GB wasn't quite
    good enough, though take away that incerdible mistake just before the
    half and that game could have gone down to the wire.
    
    The same 2 teams could both be in consecutive SB's for the first time.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1211MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Mon Jan 17 1994 03:586
    Now we know that Doc Midnight won't be totally insufferable for the
    next year. All that has to happen to make it a decent ending for the
    season is for Dallas to lose.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1212KALI::MORGANMon Jan 17 1994 11:474
    Biggest laugh I had all weekend was when #89 for KC gunned a bullet
    into Buddy's mug after scoring a touchdown.
    
    					Steve
9.1213CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 17 1994 11:499
I was rollward after the game.  Worn Moon looked pathetic, choking again
in the clutch.

Joe Montana ripped apart the vaunted Buddy Ryan defense with impunity.

Great game....


'Saw
9.1214Giants looked sickCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Jan 17 1994 11:5414
    
    Great weekend of football. I guess Buddy gets shaddaped by his
    own defense. HAHAHA. I agree that Montana did not look all that
    great but the Chiefs did win. Doesn't look as like Joe can throw
    the long one anymore. He was woefully short on several tosses.
    
    Anyone see the inflammation in Montana's right elbow? Damn that bursa
    sac problem he has looked sickening. Damn that protuberance was so
    big it reminded me of Buddy Ryan's bony ridge whar his forehaid should
    be..
    
    8^)
    MikeL
    
9.1215CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 17 1994 12:0011
>   <<< Note 9.1214 by CTHQ::LEARY "Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions" >>>
>                            -< Giants looked sick >-


Pretty indicative of a team running out of gas a couple of weeks too
early...8^)


'Saw
    

9.1217CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Jan 17 1994 12:227
    Yabbut Tommy,
    You know Buddy will be blaming the run and shoot for putting his
    blessed "d" in precarious field position. How many times did
    Moon fumble?
    
    MikeL
    
9.1219GWEN::ASHEThank you Dr. King.Mon Jan 17 1994 12:4311
    Dr. said it was expected... pulled defeat out of the jaws of victory.
    Also told me some "rest of the story" stuff on Mr. Alm.  He and the guy
    (according to Doc's sources in Houston) were REAL close and at the time
    of the accident were a) drunk and b) finding some intimate ways of
    distracting Alm while he was driving which led to the car going out of 
    control.  Knowing what happened to his buddy and what the traces of
    either fluids or worse were on him... Mr. Alm didn't want to deal with
    the NFL and the good ol' boy attitude in Houston, Mr. Alm didn't want
    to deal with the scandals and ended it.  This is all alleged and came
    from Doc's friends in Houston.
    
9.1220Get ready for Buffalo (fine with me)NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 17 1994 12:4729
> 	The KC game was another big surprise for me.  Although I'm a big
> Montana fan, I hope we all realize KC won because of their defense.  In fact,
> I feel Montana did NOT play well regardless of his reasonable numbers.
    
    I agree.  The Montana deification continues, but I don't think I've
    ever seen so much good come out of so many badly underthrown balls. 
    Houston's defenders couldn't cover and then after they got burned and
    Joe gave them reprieves they couldn't find the ball.  I think Jack 
    Pardee may have earned the right from this one to take a swing at both 
    Buddy and Gilbrade, 'cept for the fact that Pardee doesn't seem to have 
    a clue himself what it is that a head coach is supposed to do.  Just 
    another in a long line of heartaches for the Oilers.  Couldn't have 
    happened to a nicer bunch of guys.
    
    Looks like Buffalo's going back to the Super Bowl to me (KC's defense
    was incredible this week but that hasn't been the norm, and Buffalo is
    just stronger all the way around).  If they do there'll be a lot more 
    of this moaning and groaning from the sarcastic media types but the 
    fact is that Buffalo still has the best shot from the AFC to win it all, 
    and are always capable of beating anyone.  As long as it's a reasonably
    decent game, I think Buffalo coming off the deck to finally win it all
    *or* dropping a 4th straight Super Bowl is a good story either way.  I
    don't know who'll win the NFC but I don't see Kansas City putting up 
    enough of a battle either way.  Beating Houston was heroic enough but
    Dallas and San Fran are another level up...
    
    glenn
     
9.1221PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 17 1994 13:064
9.1222Good AFC games the last 2 days. NFC was boringQUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Jan 17 1994 13:0922
      I think both games next weekend will be great to watch.  PLEASE NO
    BUFFALO IN SB!!!
    
      I did get tired of the spewing over Montana yesterday.  Yes he threw
    some good balls that were dropped (the wide open TD), but in the 4th,
    it was the recievers that did the work, not Joe.  That elbow is naurly
    lookin'.
    
      I feel KC stands a good chance to beat anyone as long as their
    defense plays like they did yesterday.
    
      The DAN REEVES coached team looked like the donks of old, ie getting
    blown out.  Of course it would have been great to see the jints get
    beat in the SB.
    
      This could be #5 for 9'rs.  I want to see AFC win,  but inconsistent
    offense by both Bills and Chiefs (whomever goes) will be the demize. 
    Niether team seem to get motivated until 3rd qtr, and usually in the
    SB, its over by then....
    
    
      Tim
9.1223No D in 2nd halfBUMP::MMARLANDMon Jan 17 1994 13:2214
Wow , what are the 2ns half stats for the Oilers in their last two games.
Scored what 10 points and given up 62. Yikes....

I jave a feeling the Bills are going to win it all. They are bigger up front
than the Chiefs and Kelly is a little bit more mobil than Moon. The R&G just
doesn't hold up under a strong pass rush. I like the 9'ers over the Boys in a
close game. The Niner D will decide this game. They were porous the last 3/4 
games but played big on Sat.


Joe v Steve would be classic though.


Mike 
9.1224METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Jan 17 1994 13:4417
re: .1222

The pot calling the kettle black! Would you say the same thing about the
Broncos and the SB??



Some real good SB storylines:

Buffalo vs. Dallas - again
Buffalo vs. SF -- a team tha can't win the big one against a team that is 4-4
KC vs anyone  - Montana back again, against SF Montana vs. Young, against
                Dallas - the old warrior vs. the young turk.

NBC can't lose on the hype.

The Crazy Met
9.1226METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Jan 17 1994 13:573
what are the point spreads for next Sunday's games??

The Crazy Met
9.1228quite ironicFRETZ::HEISERRUN! Lorena has the gavel!Mon Jan 17 1994 14:051
    I'd love to see Super Joe face his old team.
9.1229MKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursMon Jan 17 1994 14:0813
	Wow!  I can't believe KC pulled it out again!  After putting in a
	12 hour day on Saturday I just couldn't stay awake past halftime.
	
	Ryan's defense looked totally in control.  They realy clobbered 
	Montana several times.  I figured there was no way he would 
	finish the game.

	There were a couple passes in the first quarter, I think, where
	the KC receivers got a case of "Bledsoe Arms".  If he would have
	only extended them he was off to races.


	billl
9.1230PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 17 1994 14:117
9.1231PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 17 1994 14:155
9.1233CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 17 1994 14:305
>    I didn't see the game, but according to the AP writeup, Joe wasn't that
>    impressive.

No, but his receivers were.....

9.1234CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 17 1994 14:319
>    Nexted thing you know, 'Saw's going to be telling us something about
>    exams, hot teams, and freak injuries.


Gee, if that's the case then those Patsies with the lousy uniforms and dump
of a stadium must've had some awfully tough exams and lots of freak
injuries this year.  

Where were they Saturday?  Packing for St. Louis?
9.1235FRETZ::HEISERRUN! Lorena has the gavel!Mon Jan 17 1994 14:362
    It could've been worse if Davis didn't drop that sure TD in the 2nd
    quarter.
9.1236NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 17 1994 14:4117
                              
    >                Dallas    even
    >                San Fran  9:5
    >                KC        3:1
    >                Buffalo   4:1
    
    Those odds add up to 130% but I get your message on where they rank;
    perhaps the odds on the AFC teams should be even longer.  We'll 
    probably be seeing the "real" ones soon enough courtesy of Sheridan or
    whomever, and the even on Dallas and the ~2:1 on San Fran are probably
    pretty close, giving the NFC over a 80% shot (1:4) on the whole thing.
    It does look like the same old story with the NFC but 1:4 odds are just
    too unappealing; the AFC teams aren't that strong but then again
    they're not the Broncos...  
    
    glenn
    
9.1237Cheap ShotCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Mon Jan 17 1994 14:4923
>>             <<< Note 9.1219 by GWEN::ASHE "Thank you Dr. King." >>>

>>    Also told me some "rest of the story" stuff on Mr. Alm.  He and the guy
>>    (according to Doc's sources in Houston) were REAL close and at the time
>>    of the accident were a) drunk and b) finding some intimate ways of
>>    distracting Alm while he was driving which led to the car going out of 
>>    control.  Knowing what happened to his buddy and what the traces of
>>    either fluids or worse were on him... Mr. Alm didn't want to deal with
>>    the NFL and the good ol' boy attitude in Houston, Mr. Alm didn't want
>>    to deal with the scandals and ended it.  This is all alleged and came
>>    from Doc's friends in Houston.
  
  
I've read this reply two or three times and debated whether or not to
reply.  Discretion lost.

This is cheap.  Maybe it's true, and maybe it's not, but at this point
it's nothing more than an allegation that besmirches the characters
of two men who are way beyond defending themselves.  If you're going
to post something like this, at least report facts, and not just
suspicions.

Jerry
9.1238GWEN::ASHEThank you Dr. King.Mon Jan 17 1994 14:573
    Facts are that he was drunk.  I can't say anything about the others.
    I've only said they were rumors and not fact.
    
9.1239You didn't see excuses coming from Pats' fansPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 17 1994 15:045
9.1240PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 17 1994 15:0915
9.1241LAGUNA::MAY_BRJWBobbit&amp;DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShortMon Jan 17 1994 15:155
 >...allegation that besmirches the characters of two men...
    
What part of their *character* is besmirched?
    
    brews
9.1242not what, but howCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Mon Jan 17 1994 16:0013
>> <<< Note 9.1241 by LAGUNA::MAY_BR "JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort" >>>

>> >...allegation that besmirches the characters of two men...
    
>>What part of their *character* is besmirched?
    
I knew that someone was going to ask this.

In my opinion, the allegation itself was not so damaging, but the
way in which it was stated.  Go back and re-read the original post
and see if you don't agree.

Jerry
9.1243GWEN::ASHEThank you Dr. King.Mon Jan 17 1994 16:053
    I don't have a problem with it.  Actually, what I heard was worse but
    didn't think should be put in here. (hint: something along the lines
    of Bruce's pname). If this is what happened, fine.  If not, fine.  
9.1244CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Mon Jan 17 1994 17:0216
Back to football:

I got to see some of the SF/NY, Dallas/GB and KC/Houston games, and all of them
were prime examples of how football games are decided in the trenches.  

San Fran's line was blowing holes in the Giants' defenseive front that allowed 
Rickey Watters to have a great game.  

Green Bay decided to rely upon Reggie White for a pass rush, and rushed only 
three people on most pass plays.  The Cowboys were able to contain White, thus
were succesful on offense.

Houston was pushing KC around early in the game, but KC adjusted their play 
slection and blocking schemes, and outsmarted the Houston defensive game plan.

=Bob=
9.1245CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 17 1994 17:2413
>San Fran's line was blowing holes in the Giants' defenseive front that allowed 
>Rickey Watters to have a great game.  

I think that the DL of the Giants needs shoring up -- either that, or the
guys who are playing there need to get a bit better.

One of the Giants strengths this year was getting Brooks and Bailey freed
up to do their thing.  The line couldn't keep the OL of SF from tying
up Brooks and Bailey, thus all the problems...  (You noticed that Mark Collins
was making a lot of tackles -- that's badness 8^))


'Saw
9.1246Dave Barry's "Football Fever"PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 17 1994 19:1794
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 94 16:08:02 EST
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Dave Barry)
Subject: Football Fever

	It is the time of year when we put the holiday season
behind us; a time when we suck in our stomachs, leave the cozy
confines of our homes, go back out into the working world,
purchase some beer, return to our homes, lie down in front of our
TVs and let our stomachs protrude back out.
	It's time for the pro football playoffs.
	I love to watch football on TV, and I will tell you
exactly why: I have no idea. Perhaps the appeal of this violent
game stems from some basic biological urge that guys have, dating
back millions of years to when primitive spear-carrying men would
go into the forest to hunt game for their families, and their very
survival depended on their ability to operate a remote control.
	Whatever the attraction is, a lot of women seem to be
immune to it. I have seen women walk right past a TV set with a
football game on -- and this always amazes me -- not stop to
watch, even if the TV is showing replays of what we call a "good
hit," which is a tackle that causes at least one major internal
organ to actually fly out of a player's body. The average guy
cannot ignore something of this importance. He is going to stop
and watch, even if he's supposed to be doing something else, such
as reporting that his house is on fire. The average guy might not
be able to name the secretary of state, but he can tell you who
made the hit that turned Joe Theisman into a human Gumby -- an
injury so horrible to watch that the TV people basically canceled
the rest of the season so they could show close-up replays of it
in slow motion.
	(Just for the record: The player who made this hit is
Lawrence Taylor. The secretary of state is a dweeb.)
	Every Thanksgiving, my family attends a gathering at the
home of our friends Gene Weingarten and Arlene Reidy. The women
all gather in one room and talk about careers, relationships,
world events, etc., while the guys, most of whom see each other
only once a year, all gather in front of the TV and stare,
cowlike, at the football game. We even watch the pickup-truck
commercials, despite the fact that most of us are journalists who
rarely haul any payload larger than, say, a bagel. We do not talk,
except to analyze the fine points of the game.
	FIRST GUY: Whoa! Look at that! What IS that?
	SECOND GUY: I think that's his spleen.
	THIRD GUY: No, a spleen that travels that far is going to
rupture. That has to be a kidney.
	I don't want you to think that all we guys do at this
gathering is watch football. We also PLAY football, in the back
yard. It's a demanding game. For one thing, each player has
recently consumed his weight in onion dip. For another thing, the
Weingarten-Reidy yard is not a regulation football field: It is a
small hillside covered with thousands of regulation dog doots,
provided courtesy of two large, high-output, retriever-style dogs,
Harry Truman and Clementine, who add to the complexity of the game
by racing around in frantic circles at high speeds, like subatomic
particles in the Superconducting Super Collider, but not as
intelligent.
	We play Standard Back-Yard Touch Football Rules, which
require that, on each down, the offensive players must spend a
minimum of five minutes in the huddle, devising a pass play more
complex than the Clinton health plan, calling for curls, hooks,
slants, feints, cutbacks, laterals, running all the way around the
house, diving into the hammock, giving the ball to a small child
and instructing the child to cry if an opposing player comes near,
etc. Once we designed a play that involved spitting on the
defensive backs.
	When the ball is snapped, everybody forgets about the play
and concentrates on (a) not falling down, and (b) avoiding the
pass rush, which is a threat to players on both sides inasmuch as
it is provided by Harry Truman, a relentless competitor who will
definitely bite your leg.
	The main difference between our games and pro football is
that sometimes we score a touchdown. This virtually never happens
in the NFL. The referees won't allow it. They're jealous of the
players, because the players get to wear sleek athletic uniforms,
whereas the referees have to wear dorky little hats and pants that
make them appear to have enormous butts. They look like they're
smuggling mattresses back there. So if a player scores a
touchdown, the referees immediately call it back and make a
complex announcement over the loudspeakers ("OK, WE HAVE HOLDING
ON NUMBER 84, WHICH IS OFFSET BY AN ILLEGAL PARAMETER ON NUMBER
73, WHICH IS FURTHER COMPOUNDED BY A FAILURE TO DECLARE NON-
ACCRUABLE DIVIDEND INCOME ON THE PART OF NUMBER 143, ALTHOUGH THIS
IS SOMEWHAT MITIGATED BY ...").
	My suggestions for making the NFL more exciting are:
	1. Allow the refs to wear cool uniforms and participate in
end-zone dances, or
	2. Allow the players to tackle the referees.  ("OK, WE
HAVE -- WHAM.")
	Speaking on behalf of a lot of guys, I urge the owners to
consider these sensible changes. Also, while they're up, they
should get me a beer.

(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
9.1247DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Mon Jan 17 1994 19:5921
I was very suprised with the defensive line play of KC. They couldn't get any
pressure on O'Donnell the previous week and I expected more of the same this
week.

As far as Dallas - GB. I guess that franchise QB Aikman should go hide his head
after only piling up huge offensive numbers and leading his team to victory on
a day when the running game was non-existant  for the first 3/4th of the
contest.
I'm sure any podunk QB could have done the same thing...

I think Dallas will do the same thing to San Fran they did last year. Eat them
up with a balanced offensive game plan. It's easy to stop a 1   dimensional
team (giants) It's tougher to stop a multi talented team....San Fran doesn't
have the D-backs to cover Irvin/Harper and stop the run....Their only chance is
to outscore the CowBoys...

Unfortunately I think we'll have a rematch of last year...At least we only have
1 week of hype in between..

Metz
9.1248incredible pressure...SALEM::STIGTue Jan 18 1994 12:274
    the reason that KC had so much pressure was the stunts and blitzes that
    they were using...
    
    stig
9.1250ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Tue Jan 18 1994 14:084
   >> I'm sure any podunk QB could have done the same thing...

     There is 24 of em sitting at home crying in their pretzels wishing
    they had the chance
9.1251C'mon, the guy can play...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 18 1994 14:359
    
    I didn't think Aikman was that spectacular last Sunday, but it seems
    like once a week now I pick up the paper and some rival GM is claiming 
    that he's the best QB in the NFC, his team support notwithstanding
    (doubtless the best).  At the very least he's got a lot of experts
    snookered...
    
    glenn
    
9.1252CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Jan 18 1994 14:469
>    I didn't think Aikman was that spectacular last Sunday, but it seems
>    like once a week now I pick up the paper and some rival GM is claiming 
>    that he's the best QB in the NFC, his team support notwithstanding
>    (doubtless the best).  At the very least he's got a lot of experts
>    snookered...
    
Hey, I guess somedays, when the rest of your team is clicking, all you
have to be is solid....8^)    

9.1253PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 18 1994 15:214
9.1254CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Jan 18 1994 15:2612
>    
>    See Phil Simms...
>

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

There's also been a lot of games where Simms carried the team.  And when
it comes to leadership on the field, I'll take Simms any day.




9.1255DYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverTue Jan 18 1994 15:3110
    There's a simple reason why most experts consider Aikman to be the best
    in the game.  I mean, look at the mans stats.  He finished second in
    the entire NFL in QB ratings (Young 101.5 - Aikman 99).  He led the
    league with a greater than 68% completion mark.  
    
    Aikman is uncanny with his accuracy.  Don't forget also that he has one
    of the strongest arms in the league.  Just my opinions of course;  all
    standard disclaimers apply!
    
    - Rope
9.1256PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 18 1994 15:314
9.1257CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Jan 18 1994 16:228
>    
>    I wouldn't expect any less from such a die hard Giants fan.
>

Oh, I get it.  When I'm right, it's attributed to me being a die-hard
Giants fan.....

'Saw
9.1258Subpar Aikmen PerformanceLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Jan 18 1994 16:269
      It would have to be considered a subpar Aikmen day.  He threw
      6 int's all year, threw two last Sunday, and had one pass go 
      right through Holland's hands which could have been a third
      int.  He sure is accurate though.
    
      Wish the Pack had lost that game a few years ago and drafted
      Aikmen instead of Mandarich.  Oh well...
    
                                                    Tony
9.1259You want facts?CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Tue Jan 18 1994 16:4612
>>        <<< Note 9.1249 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>


>>    close. Aikman notched 284 yards and threw 2 INTs. Not really *HUGE* 

The stats I saw were 27-38 for 302 yards, 3 TDs and 2 picks.  If that's
not *HUGE*, I guess it'll just have to do.  I also recall him getting
sacked at least twice.

>> But don't let facts get in your way, Metz.
   
Jerry
9.1261PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 18 1994 18:594
9.1262ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Tue Jan 18 1994 19:181
    :-)
9.1263CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Jan 18 1994 20:0922
I did.

I've watched Simms since 1979, I've watched him develop from a rookie to
where he is today.

He's not Joe Montana, he has his moments when he's brilliant and he has
moments (the 1989 playoffs against the Rams comes to mind) when he's
atrocious.

He has everything I'd want in a QB -- he's a ferocious competitor and
he's a leader on the field.   He passes well, he runs the offense well,
and he is, along with LT, responsible for pulling the Giants out of 
the quagmire of the 1970s into one of the perennial contenders of
the 80's and now 90s.


With the exception of Bledsoe, who's unproven, I'd match Simms stat for
stat, and intangible against intangible, for any of the so called
'quarterbacks' the Patriots have had since 1979.


'Saw
9.1264Simms has my respectDYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverTue Jan 18 1994 20:146
    'Saw, as a Cowboys fan I ALWAYS feared Phil Simms.  Simms may not have
    been spectacular looking, but he could pick a defense to pieces.  He
    had a couple of real good games against Dallas.  It'd be nice to see
    his career stats against the Cowboys.
    
    - Rope
9.1265METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 18 1994 20:159
> With the exception of Bledsoe, who's unproven, I'd match Simms stat for
> stat, and intangible against intangible, for any of the so called
>'quarterbacks' the Patriots have had since 1979.

So you would prove that Sims was better than bad or mediocre QBs. Not exactly
proof of his greatness.

The Crazy Met
 
9.1266Thank youCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Tue Jan 18 1994 20:2032
>>        <<< Note 9.1260 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
                                    -< ex >-

>>     Yes, facts and not your vague memory.
    
    
>>        Dal -- Harper 25 pass from Aikman (Murray kick), 5:53

	That's 1

>>        Dal -- Novacek 6 pass from Aikman (Murray kick), 14:55

	That's 2

>>        Dal -- Irvin 19 pass from Aikman (Murray kick), 9:05

	That's 3

>>                          GB         Dal
>>Net Yards Passing        327         284

>>        PASSING--Green Bay-Brett Favre 28-45-2- 331. Dallas-Troy Aikman
>>28-37-2-302.

All things considered, I'll take my "vague memory" over your "facts".  
Your reply verifies what I said, which is that Aikman went 28-37-2 
(actually, I may have said 27-38-2, so sue me) for 302 yards and 3 TDs.

The 284 Net Yards Passing reflects losses due to sacks, or didn't anybody
ever explain that to you?

Jerry
9.1267PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 18 1994 20:218
9.1268METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 18 1994 20:224
Yeah, well give Favre those receivers and I'm not sure he wouldn;t
do as well.

The Crazy Met
9.1269Eric will be the next Joe WolfFRETZ::HEISERMatthew 5:18Tue Jan 18 1994 20:231
    Hey, Joe Kleine has a decent shot at a ring this year, does Eric?
9.1270QB is the most important position on the field....DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Tue Jan 18 1994 21:0814
Favre has an equal (if not better) reciever to Irvin in Sharpe and Brooks is an
adequate reciever but less than Harper...try again...

I don't need the stats to tell me that Aikman led the team to victory over the
Packers. I watched the game and it was pretty evident. Emmit was non-existant
(due to injury) and Aikman led the team to a comfortable lead and then the
coaches decided to sit on it....It's not that tough to see why the cowboys are
defending champs and the teams that sign the Wade Wilsons, Boomer Esiasons and
Jim Harbaughs of the world sit and watch from their living rooms....

Young, Aikman, Kelly and Montana in the final four...coincidence? I think not..

Metz
9.1271So & so's better than....blah blahKIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutWed Jan 19 1994 04:2120
    QB's are only as good as the following:
    
    1) Offensive line
    2) Coaching/franchise
    3) Skill
    4) Receiver corps
    
    In that order.
    
    For those of you who watch the Bills or the Niners - how often have you
    seen Bono (OK he comes on when it's all over usually) come on and be
    inept. How 'bout Reich ?? He consistently comes on for Kelly when his
    glass body can't take a couple of sacks or he goes in the huff & he
    seems to me to do an excelent job. His stats are as good as Kelly's.
    
    My justification for the list.
    What do I know, I played soccer @ school :-)
    
    Davie.
     
9.1273stats sucksHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropWed Jan 19 1994 13:048
Nowhere is it written that a good/great QB has to put up good/huge
numbers to earn the G rating. And on the flip side, putting up the
numbers don't necessarily make the grade, either.

There are a couple of attributes that the great QB share. These include
doing what they have to do to win and winning big games. 

TTom
9.1274METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 13:324
Look at Bob Griese's stats for the 1972 and 1973 seasons. I think he averaged
about 20 throws a game.

The Crazy Met
9.1276relative talentHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropWed Jan 19 1994 14:2010
San Francisco didn't have the talent that the 70 Steelers did. Just look
at the Hall of Fame and about every other starter for Pittsburgh has made
it.

So I guess this means that Joe Montana > Terry Bradshaw?

And yes, Earl completed the regular season for Griese and started the
first playoff game in 72.

TTom
9.1278NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 19 1994 14:4314
    
    What's being proved again by all these examples over the years is that
    there's no such thing as a "franchise player" in football, if your
    definition is one of a player who can lead a team to great success by
    himself or with minimal help.  It's just not possible in a game with 22
    starting players.  It doesn't matter in what order the great players 
    come to the team (Bradshaw was one of the first in Pittsburgh), it 
    doesn't matter if you build defense first and then go for offense or 
    vice versa, it only matters where you eventually end up.  You're not 
    going to find any significant common element to the great teams other
    than the obvious fact that they all had great players...
    
    glenn
    
9.1279VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady,Steady,Go!Wed Jan 19 1994 14:518
9.1280PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 19 1994 15:103
9.1281METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 15:145
But look at KC with Montana, but without Marcus Allen and/or Derrick Thomas.
Montana pushes 'em over the edge, but he could not carry the team in
his own.

The Crazy Met
9.1282LAGUNA::MAY_BRJWBobbit&amp;DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShortWed Jan 19 1994 15:2013
    > Bill Walsh will be in the Hall. Ronnie Lott will be in the Hall.     
    >Bubba Paris probably deserves to be
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Nice of you to try to help the people of California in this time of
    misery with a good joke, Tommy.  Bubba PAris?? The guy was vilified and
    singularly responsible for many of Montana's injuries.  If you wanted
    another OL. try Jessie Sapolo[sp], and possibly HArris Barton, but not
    Blubber Paris. Eric Wright was as good a CB as there was for a few
    years until his hammies went on him.  And while I like Taylor, I don't
    think we'll see JT in the Hall.
    
    brews
9.1283CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Jan 19 1994 15:2129
9.1285VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady,Steady,Go!Wed Jan 19 1994 15:3319
9.1286METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 15:473
Wasn't Simms injured during the 49'ers game then Hoss took over?

The Crazy Met
9.1287Dennis Hopper commercials are in trouble ?OURGNG::RIGGENSales gets commisions we get &quot;JACK&quot;Wed Jan 19 1994 16:096
I read in the paper that a group claims that Dennis Hopper's Nike commercials
are making parody of the mentally ill people of the world and has asked Nike to 
voluntarily remove them from the air. 

Does anybody think we live in a free country anymore.

9.1288DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 19 1994 16:259
Tommy,

First you say that Aikman isn't the franchise player for the Cowboys, Emmitt
is. Then you state that their is no such thing as a franchise player.

Which is it bud?

  Metz
9.1290Metz, 'ya gotta work on name recognitionMETSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 17:456
.1278 said there was no such thing as a franchise player  in football. that was
glenn not tommy.

HtH

The Crazy Met
9.1291I've got verbal scoots.KIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutWed Jan 19 1994 18:1223
    I can't fail to notice a constant belittling of the Patriots in here.
    Take the 'discussion' about Pat QB's. Surely this goes to enforce what
    I was trying to put across in my earlier post. Doesn't matter how good
    your QB is whether you're rebuilding or not. You need to have a HC like
    Bill P who has balls & winning experience (to a degree :-). But even
    before all that you need a well structured franchise & an owner who
    will back the team to the HILT. Not soft stroke them around and try
    to 'do your best with the money/resources available.
    							Orthwein (sp) is
    like many others in the League. The teams with owners like these will
    NEVER make it big time. Over here we see the same in soccer. All the
    teams who seem to be on a lower level than the others still bring
    through classy players but they never stay that way because the owner
    doesn't fully back the squad & you end up asking him to do more than
    he has natural talent to cope with. Result - complete cack Pat QB.
    
    Dallas made it work but we all know how that was achieved. Painful at
    the time but an absolute must. JJ would be dung if it wasn't for his
    rich busom bud in the big chair.
    
    Franchise is king.
    
    Davie.
9.1293Skunk squadKIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutWed Jan 19 1994 18:479
    I guessed some of you fans were doing it. I suppose if my team couldn't
    kick sh*t off a one legged dog's ass i'd be a wee bit peeved as well.
    I like what meat Parcel has done at the Pats. They look as though they
    mean business in the nest coupla years - all depends on the club sale
    though.
           I just wish they hadn't shafted my beloved fish on the last game
    of the season. Who the hell is Ben Coates apart from TE of the year ??
    
    Davie.
9.1294DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 19 1994 18:5214
Just to get away with the franchise player talk..

What player on the team deserves the most money?

I say it's the QB. he's the cornerstone of the whole team (I'm talking about
players not fat dudes that stand around yelling all day), he makes the on field
decisions and his skill set is more valuable than anybody else out there. I
don;t think you win the big one without a very-good to excellent QB. There are
a lot of mediocre QB's playing in the NFL and I think that the drop off in the
level of team play gets effected more by the QB than any other position, The Qb
can't win the game and the super bowl by himself but I can't think of an
example of a team winning the whole enchilada with even a mediocre Qb.

Metz
9.1295VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady,Steady,Go!Wed Jan 19 1994 18:5310
9.1296METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 18:587
Metz, do you mean over a career or over a season?

Rypien was not exactly a great QB; he had a phenomenal year.

Dallas in 1971? Who was the QB, Morton?

The Crazy Met
9.1297Here's mudKIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutWed Jan 19 1994 19:009
    He's got the highest profile & the most pressure. I agree to an extent
    to what you say but also think they are far to overrated. A QB usually
    gets taught the schemes & runs of the club. Whether or not he calls
    them on his own still doesn't get away from the fact that the coaches
    are crucial.
    
    I just want an argument anyway :-)
    
    Davie.
9.1298DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 19 1994 19:049
even if he's calling a play sent in by the  coach he has to make the read on
the safeties, figure out what route the WR's are running (most routes are site
reads  these days based on the coverage)...that's the mental part..then he has
to deliver the baall to the right spot at the right time over the linemen and
usually gets cracked 2 times out of 3 on passing downs while fully exposed 
with his hand over his head... (that's the physical part)

Metz
9.1299Captain AmericaDYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverWed Jan 19 1994 19:0915
>>              <<< Note 9.1296 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94" >>>

>>Metz, do you mean over a career or over a season?

>>Rypien was not exactly a great QB; he had a phenomenal year.

>>Dallas in 1971? Who was the QB, Morton?

>>The Crazy Met
    
    The only Super Bowl Morton ever won for Dallas was 1977 - Dallas vs.
    Denver!  QB in 1971 was the incomparable Roger Staubach.
    
    - Rope
    
9.1300METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 19:103
Ok, wasn't sure when Staubach joined the Cowboys.

The Crazy Met
9.1301VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady,Steady,Go!Wed Jan 19 1994 19:126
    	No, I believe Morton was the quarterback for the '71 Dallas team
    that lost to Baltimore.  Staubach was the quarterback in '72 and '77,
    but Morton was the quarterback for the '77 Donkey team.  Give me Joe
    Montana anyday.  Heck he's even making Schottenheimer look good.
    
    				/Don
9.1302METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 19:194
/er I was talking about the 1971 season. Dallas beat Miami after the 1971 
season, that was the 1972 SB.

Morton 
9.1304QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyWed Jan 19 1994 19:374
      I say a QB can be a franchise player.  Look at Elway over the past
    years.  He did most everything to get them there.
    
      Tim
9.1305METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 19:395
re: .1304

yabbut we're talking about winning the whole enchilada.

The Crazy Met
9.1306CSC32::GAULKEWed Jan 19 1994 19:429
    
    
    >> yabbut we're talking about winning the whole enchilada.
    
    
     Elway doesn't like Mexican food.
    
    
    
9.1307DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 19 1994 19:4416
Taylor would have commanded more than Simms or Hoss on the open market because
a team that already had a good starting QB would have eagerly gone after a
great LB. However would a team like Tampa Bay be better off signing LT or Joe
Montana if both were available as free agents?

If you were starting a football team from scratch and could pick any player
where would you start?

I agree with your Giant example of the best player on the team not always the
QB. However I'd say that 75% of the time it is the QB that's the best player on
the team and in the cases that it's not it because the QB isn't good or the
team has a "best player on the planet" at another position.


Metz
9.1308QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyWed Jan 19 1994 19:529
      You don't have to win a SB to be a frachise player.
    
      Marino is another case.  
    
       Rypein isn't even close to a franchise player, but he did win
    a SB. He isn't much (except a whiner) without that good OL. Case in
    point the last 2 years.
    
      Tim
9.13092 to chewKIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutWed Jan 19 1994 20:295
    A couple of other 'dimming lights':
    
    					Doug (who ?) Williams
    					Boomer Esiason
    Davie.
9.1310NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 19 1994 20:5235
>     The most valuable player on the team. Contentiousness aside, I agree 
>     with you, Metz that the QB position does require the most mental agility 
>     but I still think that your QB needn't be your best player and often isn't.
>     Case in point: Lawrence Taylor in his prime. LT was, imo, the best player
>     in football nevermind just on the Giants, the very definition of a "fran-
>     chise player".  We know what he did to offenses and you don't win those 
>     two SBs without him. No way you should pay Hostedler or Simms more than 
>     you pay Taylor just because they play QB. If they would have had free
>     agency much earlier in their career's who would have commanded more? 
 
    A couple of nights ago while sitting in another snowstorm-induced
    traffic jam I heard a very similar discussion come up on WFAN, where
    Franscesa and Russo were asked to reflect on LT's career.  One caller
    asked which they'd take if they had the choice between LT's or Joe 
    Montana's career and both without hesitation reponded "Montana; he's a
    QB" (I was kind of surprised; these guys are Giants' fans and both have 
    followed LT's career very closely).  Granted, this is not any kind of
    definitive answer to the specific question and I'm not sure I even 
    agree with it, but I do think that the fact that it is a tough choice 
    points out that it's kind of silly to say that a player like LT can 
    be the definition of a "franchise player" but a QB like Montana can't.  
    Any argument in favor of one can be used for the other.
    
    In the case of Montana specifically, Tommy, I'm kind of confused how
    you can say that you like Kansas City to go to the Super Bowl in
    large part due to the "Montana Factor" at the same time that you
    concede that he's no longer much more than an average QB.  If that's 
    not the kind of respect normally associated with this nebulous concept 
    of a "franchise player", I don't know what is.  It doesn't sound like
    the kind of thing that would be said about Steve Bono (or even Steve
    Young, both of whom haven't won a thing, system or no system).
    
    glenn
    
9.1311CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Jan 20 1994 11:3820
>   How do you match "intangible for intangible"? Aren't intangibles by
>   definition immeasurable?

Technically yes, but I remember in the pick 'em segments on CBS a few
years back they used to compare "intangibles" and that'w what I was
thinking of.


>  Obviously, you didn't watch any Pats games this year and are just taking an
>  unnecessary swipe at all Pats fans. It ain't our fault that film Simms was
>  a mediocre QB that happened to be in the right place at the right time.

Tommy, I know you're sharper than that.  If you read back a few notes,
you'll know that I disqualified this season since Bledsoe is a rookie
and didn't have a chance to really prove himself.


'Saw
    

9.1312CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Jan 20 1994 11:3912
>	Simms was the quarterback when the Giants lost to the 49ers on a 
>Monday night game during the regular season.  Hoss was the quarterback when 
>the Giants won the NFC Championship game that same season against the 49ers.

Yeah, so?

Eason was the quarterback when that Pats beat the Dolphins to go to the
Super Bowl, Eason was the quarterback in that marvelous Patriots effort
against the Bears.

What's it prove?

9.1313eason,flutie and grogs...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedThu Jan 20 1994 11:593
    and flutie was doing his thang two...
    
                stiggy
9.1315PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 20 1994 12:537
9.1316METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 20 1994 13:024
But look what it took to get Plunkett those SB rings; Marcus Allen, raiders
WR and TE; defense.

The Crazy Met
9.1317Skills plus leadership... what more is there?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 20 1994 13:1734
    
>     His skills have definitely eroded but he's 
>     got a team behind him now that has complete confidence in him and thinks 
>     that they'll never be out of a game. I think Saw would call that an in-
>     tangible. Is that any clearer?
    
    How does any of this differ from what can be said about *any* player 
    who attains the reputation of "franchise player" (over the course of 
    career; obviously Montana has slipped some)?  Being the team leader in
    addition to one of its best players is what it's all about, and that
    quality can come from anywhere, QB certainly not excluded.  I didn't 
    say you said that Montana was the whole team, I said you claimed that 
    he is a *large part* of why they'll be AFC champs.  And that's exactly 
    what you said.
    
  >> It doesn't sound like the kind of thing that would be said about Steve 
  >> Bono (or even Steve Young, both of whom haven't won a thing, system or 
  >> no system).
    
>     If there's any one difference between these Niners and the championship
>     era Niners, it's the defense, especially the run defense. The offense
>     hasn't slipped at all.    
    
    As I recall, the 49ers won a championship as an NFC Championship Game
    and Super Bowl underdog, with a team that was much more offense than 
    defense at the time, with Dwight Clark and Freddie Solomon as receivers, 
    and with Earl Cooper as the primary rushing threat.  I mean, the guy 
    has spanned the eras, done it all, and he may do so again (I don't
    think he will even get to the Super Bowl; the odds are too great, but
    that's besides the point).  All that but still not a "franchise player"
    (if you accept that there is such a thing)?  Really?
    
    glenn
    
9.1318More crow potential...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 21 1994 13:2114
    Feeling the urge to go out on a limb on at least one of these games
    this weekend, I like San Fran to upset Dallas (and at the very least
    cover).  San Fran's defense has taken some raps but they really have
    not given up a lot of points at all this year, especially considering
    the wide-open game they play on offense that leaves the opponents with
    more possessions than a ball-control team like the Giants (or even the
    Cowboys).  Their offense is still the best.  I'd be very wary of going 
    against Dallas at home but I just can't get past this Emmitt Smith 
    injury thing.  If he can't play at at least 90% I don't think they have
    enough.  So make it San Fran-Buffalo for next weekend...
    
    glenn
    
9.1319JMHOAD::HEATHHave pitchers and catchers reported yet?Fri Jan 21 1994 13:329
    
    
      Glen...
    
      I don't think that you've gone to far out on a limb in picking the '9ers to
    beat Dallas.  In fact I don't think you've left the trunk.  I think the
    49'ers will beat Dallas outright.  
    
    Jerry 
9.1320one moreHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropFri Jan 21 1994 14:075
Just like certain parts o' the anatomy...

It looks like KC and Dallas to me.

TTom
9.1321VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady,Steady,Go!Fri Jan 21 1994 14:184
    	I like (not really) Dallas giving the points and Kansas City
    getting the points.
    
    				/Don
9.1322Johnson does NamathHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropFri Jan 21 1994 14:1917
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups:
clari.sports.football,clari.local.texas,clari.local.california
Subject: No question about it -- Dallas will win, insists Johnson
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 94 20:41:16 PST

        DALLAS (UPI) -- A confident and candid Jimmy Johnson told a Dallas
radio station Thursday that his Dallas Cowboys would definitely beat the
San Francisco 49ers Sunday in the National Football Conference
championship game in Irving, Texas.
        ``We are going to beat their rear ends,'' said Johnson, now in his
fifth year as the Cowboys head coach. ``We will win. And you can print
that in three-inch headlines.''
        The defending Super Bowl champion Cowboys are 3 1-2-point favorites
over San Francisco. The game will be a rematch of last year's NFC
championship game, in which Dallas held off the 49ers, 30-20, at Candle
Stick Park in San Francisco.
9.1323what an idjitFRETZ::HEISERMatthew 5:18Fri Jan 21 1994 14:211
    
9.1324MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 14:236
    One more reason to hope the 49ers kick Dallas' butt on Sunday.
    
    49ers and Bills to win. Both in close (< TD margin) games.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1325PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 21 1994 14:402
    It's about time someone spoke his mind rather than do the "any given
    Sunday, they've got a good team, we're just glad to be here" BS.
9.1326how many Namath's are there?MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 14:4414
    Fine, now his team better back it up.
    
    Some stupid statements from the past:
    
    Denver braggin about the Orang Crush defense and then getting crushed
    by Dallas.
    David Cone and that stupid column he ghosted for the Daily News(?) at
    the start of the 1988 playoffs.
    There are others.
    
    More often than not those statements come back to haunt you.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1327GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Fri Jan 21 1994 14:487
    re: .1325
    
    Gee, Mac, what would you have said if Buddy Ryan had said that? Nice
    double standard there.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.1328Cowboys Rule Sunday!DYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverFri Jan 21 1994 14:4818
              <<< Note 9.1325 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>

>>    It's about time someone spoke his mind rather than do the "any given
>>    Sunday, they've got a good team, we're just glad to be here" BS.
    
    Amen to that Mac!  Johnson's an excellent motivator.  Obviously he
    knows just what buttons to push.  Dallas has the best team in the
    league.  Unfortunately injuries have taken their toil the last few
    weeks.  What many don't realize is the HUGE problem caused by All-Pro
    center Mark Stepnoski being out.  I look for San Fran to try to exploit
    Gesek in the middle.
    
    I'm still picking the 'Boys injuries and all.  If you thought the NY
    Giant performance by Emmitt was something, you ain't seen nothing yet!
    
    - Rope

    
9.132949ers, chiefs for AtlantaAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billFri Jan 21 1994 14:4910
    I will take 49ers and KC.
    
    I think KC can beat Bills in temp's of 25 degrees but not in conditions
    like last week.
    
    Dallas is not team they were last year but I would not be going against
    them counting on Emmitt "not to show up".
    
    And one way or t'other I don't want to see bills-'boys again though I
    doubt even that would be a runaway.
9.1330PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 21 1994 14:494
9.1331MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 14:584
    Dennis in all fairness, Mac is right on the money in .1330
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1332ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Fri Jan 21 1994 15:045
     If he didn't think his team could do it he wouldn't be saying it.
    
     If this doesn't motivate the niners even more than they are now then
    nothing will. Johnson wants the niners to be at their best so that if
    Dallas does indeed win he can say he beat the best.
9.1333LAGUNA::MAY_BRJWBobbit&amp;DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShortFri Jan 21 1994 15:2110
 >    If this doesn't motivate the niners even more than they are now then   
 >   nothing will
    
    If the niners weren't already motivated, nothing anyone says can make
    much of a difference.
    
    One good thing about the injuries to Maryland and Smith is that if the
    niners do win, I can say that the Giants helped put the Cowboys out.
    
    brews
9.1334could make it tuff...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedFri Jan 21 1994 15:278
    re .1328.   Dallas might have the best team in the league but they
    aren't unbeatable. The old saying goes, "anyone can beat anyone in any
    giving day". The statement from Johnson is only going to fire up the
    9ers and it shows them "no respect" as far as Dallas is concerned. They
    already are going to have a hard enuff time beating the 9ers as is, why
    make it worse.
    
                  stig
9.1335CSC32::M_MACGREGORFri Jan 21 1994 15:3110
    
    Human nature.  When you are told you can't do something you try to
    prove them wrong.  Some people rise to the occasion, while others make
    mental mistakes because they are trying to make the big play.  Maybe
    Johnson has made an assessment based over time about the 49er players
    and thinks that such a remark will benifit more than hurt.  Before you
    go saying it was a good/bad statement to make, let's see what the
    results are first.
    
    Marc
9.1336Just makes it sweeter for the rest of us if Dallas loses...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 21 1994 15:3312
    
    I don't think a statement like Johnson's makes a bit of difference
    on the game either way; he just looks like a bigger jerk than he 
    already is if Dallas loses.  If they win, hey, Jimmy was right, but 
    they've still got another game to play.  The statement doesn't reflect 
    the reality of Dallas' situation (they are far from a guaranteed
    rock-solid lock) so it doesn't appear to be a real smart gamble.  But
    that's JJ.  He's been burned by similar statements before, like when he
    was at Miami, but obviously doesn't give a damn.
    
    glenn
     
9.1337CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 21 1994 17:0210
Meanwhile in Atlanta...

It seems that the head coaching job is down to three candidates: 
defensive coordinator June Jones, Joe Gibb, and Boston College coach Tom 
Coughlin.

I wonder if now tha tGlanville is gone, they'll get rid of those dumb 
black-on-black uniforms.

=Bob=
9.1338TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Fri Jan 21 1994 17:156
..it's Gibbs, =Bob=
He ain't a Bee Gee
;-)
dr.a

and I think Coughlin said no, didn't he?
9.1339CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 21 1994 17:2510
9.1340FRETZ::HEISERMatthew 5:18Fri Jan 21 1994 17:374
    >                            -< Johnson does Namath >-
    
    now it don't count in a non-championship game, at least that's what they 
    told me last year when Westphal successfully did it.
9.1342Feel better now, Tommy? Sheesh...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 21 1994 17:5210
    
    The game is being played in Dallas, and not a neutral field, right?
    It's "Dallas and everyone else", right?  And I had thought the spread 
    was 6 points.  Whatever.  San Fran over Dallas, no upset.  In this 
    place it doesn't matter if you say that you like the 100-to-1 shot to 
    give it a game until haltime; if you're wrong you'll be raked over the
    coals just the same...
    
    glenn
    
9.1343chance for a middle, especiall if it fell to 2.5MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 18:076
    Glenn,
    
    spread started at 6 and is now 3.5
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1344QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyFri Jan 21 1994 18:0818
      I would like to see a SF vs KC SB just for different teams (plus I
    dislike the sowboys and the bills will roll over for a nap), but I
    don't think I will be able to keep food down when having to listen to
    the Montana vs Young spew.  It would be hyped as the SB of all time
    blah blah blah...
    
      I like 9'rs over girls and KC (defense) over the stills....
    
      Then again, my team choked so it doesn't matter that much as long as
    a good SB is shown, and with 1 week off, that might happen.
    
      I don't know if anyone posted this elsewhere yet, but I heard that
    Madden and is drawing board are going to FOX for 4 years at $30
    million.  Is this baseball or what?  Thats alot of $$$$ for a fat man
    that needs to wear a bib when commentating (-)
    
    
      Tim
9.1345DYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverFri Jan 21 1994 18:1139
                     <<< Note 9.1336 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
>>    He's been burned by similar statements before, like when he
>>    was at Miami, but obviously doesn't give a damn.
    
>>    glenn
    
    glenn, obviously Johnson hasn't been burned too much or often.  He's a
    proven winner no matter what level he's coached.  I'd imagine there's
    an awful lot of pro and college coaches that would take his record in a
    second.  He is one of the brightest football coaches I've ever seen. 
    The man doesn't leave anything to chance.  Having a degree in
    Industrial Physcology, I'd imagine his statement was meant also to fire
    up the Cowboys.
    
    Here's a bit of that physcology in action from last season.  This was
    printed in today's USA TODAY.  To put the quote in proper context,
    Johnson was talking to the team after the media had been saying they
    would struggle with all of the media focus, etc., during the two week
    period.
    
    Reprinted W/O Permission
    
    "And I told our players, 'Understand this.  If we were playing Buffalo
    out here on the practice field with nobody watching, we'd kick the hell
    out of them.  Now, all of a sudden we're going to go halfway across the
    country to another location, and a lot of people are going to be
    interviewing you and talking to you, and you're going to let that seed
    go into your mind and because of a distraction you're going to play
    differently?'
         "I said, "We're going to go to Pasadena, we're going to deal with
    the media, go through the functions and do our deal.  We're going to
    practice hard and be prepared.  But when the game starts, in our mind,
    we're going to be on the practice field.  And because we're the best
    team, we'll win.'  That's the seed that I planted."
     
    The man's a motivator, and does whatever it takes to win.  No way, I'd
    bet against him or Dallas this weekend.
    
    - Rope
9.1346But take the over!!!!!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MMark Matthew Jr. 6lbs 6 ounces.Fri Jan 21 1994 18:149
    
    
        Tommy,
    
    
          Glen just likes the 9ers cuz they got some red in there uni's.
    
    
    Chappy
9.1347Great coach; just don't like him...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 21 1994 18:3238
>    glenn, obviously Johnson hasn't been burned too much or often.  He's a
>    proven winner no matter what level he's coached.  I'd imagine there's
>    an awful lot of pro and college coaches that would take his record in a
>    second.  He is one of the brightest football coaches I've ever seen. 
>    The man doesn't leave anything to chance.  Having a degree in
>    Industrial Physcology, I'd imagine his statement was meant also to fire
>    up the Cowboys.
    
    Ropes, I have no argument with the stuff about JJ's coaching ability. 
    I'm not buying into the psychobabble, though.  For starters, the guy
    "motivated" a couple of championship-favorite Miami Hurricane teams into 
    major upsets in the bowls after the 1985 and 1986 seasons.  The 1987
    Fiesta Bowl in particular was one of the alltime greatest comeuppances
    in college football history, and JJ was right at the forefront in 
    guaranteeing victory, keeping his team out of serious practice 
    sessions and claiming that they didn't need the work and play better 
    that way, etc.  Granted, he has gotten tough in the pros, real tough,
    but I'm still not so sure that he's that well-connected with his players'
    mental states.  
    
    On a more serious note, didn't I hear JJ in an interview admitting to 
    suffering from manic depression or something (I'd have a hard time 
    believing he could function as an NFL head coach with legitimate 
    clinical manic depression, though), where he said among other things 
    he won't be in this business for much longer?  I don't think this stuff
    is some great psychological calculation; I think it's the real JJ and 
    that he's something of a kook.  That's not why I don't like him, though;
    that's where the arrogance comes in. 
    
    > The man's a motivator, and does whatever it takes to win.  No way, I'd
    > bet against him or Dallas this weekend.
    
    I'm hearing that it's really not that big a deal to do so, depending on
    the day of the week, that is... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
9.1348CSC32::M_MACGREGORFri Jan 21 1994 18:3416
    
    After a 20 all tie in regulation they will play some sudden-death
    overtime which will get a whole new meaning when some older player has
    a heart attack from the stress.  An hour later (after two overtimes) we
    will see several mistakes and noone will be able to move the ball. 
    Somewhere around the 9th overtime the 49er punter will catch the ball
    and collapse (along with everyone else) from exaustion.  Of course,
    this will seem strange that a kicker will be exausted, but we all know
    they aren't atheletes anyways.  10 minutes later the gatorade guy will
    see a ball lying in the end zone (noone has picked it up yet) and go to
    retreive it.  The officials will be so exausted that they won't
    realize that he is the 12 player on the field and Dallas will will
    26-20.
    
    Marc
    
9.1349top 'o his gameCSC32::GAULKEFri Jan 21 1994 18:3613
    
    
    >> JJ not a motivator.
    
    
      The guy has got a degree in Industrial Psychology, fer crissakes!
    
     
     If he can make a John Deere lawnmower feel good about itself, imagine
    what he's doing for his players.
    
    
       
9.1350DYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverFri Jan 21 1994 18:389
    glenn,
    
    Haven't heard anything about depression w/ Johnson.  I'd agree that it
    doesn't seem he would be performing at this level if that were the
    case.  He defintetly is arrogant and cocky.  If he coaches your
    favorite team, you love it.  I personally believe he's got some
    misplaced priorities, but he didn't ask me!
    
    - Rope
9.1351assh*les uniteKIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutFri Jan 21 1994 18:526
    re last few.
    
    All it goes to show is that he's got a big mouth & he's cheapening
    a good game. Whether the Cowboys win or not I for one will not think
    as much of JJ 'cause of his mouf.
    				     Davie.
9.1352PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 21 1994 18:553
    Cheapening a good game?  That's what the Super Bowl and everything
    leading up to it is all about -- HYPE.  He's helping the network out. 
    More people will be tuning to see if JJ backs his comments up.
9.1353KIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutFri Jan 21 1994 19:106
    Well if what you say is true they must leave their minds at home in the
    refrigerator. Me ? Hell i'm weird - I watch it because it's a GAME.
    Two teams of top athletes pitted against one another. I don't think the
    wind & piss that gets gassed around does much for the game, just more
    for the individual's inflated ego.
    					Davie.
9.1355ex ex vee eye eye eyeTNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Fri Jan 21 1994 19:256
January 30 will bring us history's first-ever
six-digit Super Bowl.

Here's hoping it's NOT the two what went at it lasted year!

dr.a
9.1356CSC32::GAULKEFri Jan 21 1994 19:3012
    
    
    >>January 30 will bring us history's first-ever
    >>six-digit Super Bowl.
    
    
     Upon further review, that indicates "nobody under the age of 18 
    will be admitted to SuperBowl 30."
    
    
      
      
9.1357PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 21 1994 20:087
9.1358Is it worth a tenner ?KIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutFri Jan 21 1994 20:538
    -1 ; Very true but it always makes me shed a little more skin with each
    little stunt they pull.
    
    On another note; does anyone have any info on old swollen elbow v
    cold ground with HFA (not necessarily in the playoffs). Off the top
    of your head would do.
    
    Davie.
9.1359MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Sat Jan 22 1994 23:167
    re: hype
    
    at least there is only one week between the Championship games and the
    SB this year.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1360Get Your Ego HerePAKORA::KMILNENo sleep till BedtimeSun Jan 23 1994 11:1116
    Maybe a little late in the day foor this and probably repeating what a
    few others have said--but JJ is a great coach who just happens to have
    a giant ego  with a large enough mouth to let that ego spew forth every
    now and then. Now I don't like the Cowboys very much, not even a little
    bit if I'm honest but JJ has earned my resect the he's turned them
    around. He's hardly the only person in the game who has overfuelled
    ego. It's probably one of the things that raises the great from the
    ordinary in this game. Supreme self belief is a must for competing at
    the very top in any sport and about the only one that didn't ever let
    everybody know how great he was, was Payton. 
    
    Oh yeah Dallas and Kansas in the SB, with KC winning it hopefully
    
    					Kenny
    
    				
9.1361MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Sun Jan 23 1994 23:387
    Play it again Sam. Dallas and Buffalo in the SB. Neither game was
    particularly close.
    
    Dallas is listed as a 10 point favorite.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1362Class of the NFL - Ain't Even CloseDYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverMon Jan 24 1994 01:0418
    Dallas crushes San Francisco 38-21.  The game was more lop-sided than
    the score indicates!  Total domination on both sides of the ball.  This
    team has shown the last two seasons that when it's focused, it's lights
    out for the opposition.  Before Aikman left with the concussion, I
    counted one time that he was hit by a 49er lineman.  Most of the time,
    he had no one within 6 feet of him when he released the ball.
    
    Defensively, Dallas played great.  Ricky Watters and the 49ers learned
    something today that frankly they should've known alot earlier through
    watching film.  NOBODY runs a sweep on the Cowboys.  The Dallas
    linebackers and lineman are too quick.  Nice to see the hotdog Watters
    thoroughly silenced.
    
    HOW 'BOUT THEM COWBOYS!!!
    
    2 straight Super Bowl victories.
    
    - Rope
9.1363Same ole' guy.SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Mon Jan 24 1994 10:2811
    BERNIE	BERNIE	BERNIE	BERNIE	BERNIE	BERNIE	BERNIE	BERNIE
    
    
    		Leads Dallas to the game breaker.....45 yrd TD to Harper!
    	Then leads Dallas to another fieldgoal.
    
    
    	Go Bernie!
    
    		WOOF!
    
9.1364METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Jan 24 1994 12:435
> 2 straight Super Bowl victories.

don't count your chickens before they're hatched.

The Crazy Met
9.1365Bye Bye CBSOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Mon Jan 24 1994 13:483
    Who watched till CBS went off the air and saw that final retrospective
    with Summerall and Madden? That was pretty good,but the Gumbell /Terry 
    shtick was embarrassing.
9.1366Since "no one got hurt" ;-) I loved it...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 24 1994 14:0419
>    Who watched till CBS went off the air and saw that final retrospective
>    with Summerall and Madden? That was pretty good,but the Gumbell /Terry 
>    shtick was embarrassing.
    
    Best entertainment of the day was Coach Dikka being pelted by
    snowballs in Buffalo and getting all worked up about it, responding 
    to his partner's postgame reconciliatory garbage of "well, Mike, it 
    wasn't really your intent to show disrespect to this great Buffalo 
    team, right?" with some comment about the taunters being the lousiest 
    fans he'd ever seen.  Dikka was *hot*.  Personally, given his own 
    underachieving track record with da Bearz and his role as a supposed
    professional commentator, I thought his original remarks about the 
    Bills ("boring") were pretty stupid.  But that's Dikka, thinking with
    his spleen instead of his head, always embroiled in some kind of
    controversy...
    
    glenn
     
9.1367MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Mon Jan 24 1994 14:055
    Madden and Summerall was fine.  The only thing worse than the thought
    of Terry giving Greg some sugar was the Big Fan doing the same with
    his wife.
    
    Mike
9.136838242::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 24 1994 14:076
    Looks like JJ was right.
    
    2 anticlimatic conference championships = climatic Super Bowl?  I hope
    so.
    
    Any word on Aikman?
9.1369hoping for a good gameFRETZ::HEISERMatthew 5:18Mon Jan 24 1994 14:257
    Gumbel looked like he was gonna breakdown and cry.
    
    The loser of this year's Super Bowl will have 4 losses in the Big Game.
    
    Not only were the conference championships anticlimatic, but the past
    SB's with only 1 week off beforehand have been very competitive (last
    one was Bills-Giants and Norwood's wide right).
9.1370METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Jan 24 1994 14:574
yup, stuck around to see what Madden and Summerall would say at the end.
I would bet that they will both be on FOX next season.

The Crazy Met
9.137138346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 24 1994 15:063
    Former Jets coach Bruce Coslet has picked up by the Bengals to be their
    offensive co-ordinator.  Kind of ironic seeing how an ex-Bengal QB
    helped get Coslet fired from the Jets.
9.1372NFL/CBS/FOX38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 24 1994 15:1764
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Jan 20 to 23, 1994:

--------
Subject: Madden and Summerall reportedly sign with Fox
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 94 20:31:23 PST
 
	LOS ANGELES (UPI) -- The Fox Network reportedly made another valuable
acquisition Thursday, signing not only veteran National Football League
commentator John Madden but his broadcast partner for the last 13 years,
Pat Summerall, as well.
	USA Today reported Friday that Madden and Summerall, CBS' number one
team for NFL telecasts, will be moving to the rival network. Fox outbid
CBS for the National Football Conference portion of the NFL television
package last month with an offer of $1.58 billion over four years.
	USA Today reported that Madden was lured away from CBS with a four-
year deal worth more than $30 million. However, Madden said Friday that
he hadn't agreed anything or signed anything with Fox. But if the
reports are accurate, Madden will get a huge yearly increase in his
salary, going from $2.5 million a year with CBS to $7.5 million with
Fox. Madden was reportedly offered $4 million per year from NBC.
	Madden's departure from CBS had been expected since Fox gained the
contract and he had been rumored heading to ABC and NBC as well in
recent weeks.
	Figures for Summerall, who was earning $1.5 million per year at CBS,
were not available. Summerall's complete departure from CBS was not
expected. He has been the network's primary tennis and golf commentator.
CBS will use Jim Nantz on its golf coverage.
	Madden and Summerall will work CBS' final NFL game for at least four
years Sunday when the Dallas Cowboys host the San Francisco 49ers in the
NFC title game. CBS has been broadcasting the NFL for 38 years. 

--------
Subject: CBS bids farewell to NFL
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 94 17:20:40 PST
 
	DALLAS (UPI) -- CBS bade an emotional farewell to pro football Sunday
night after 38 years of broadcasting National Football League games.
	``It's a sad day,'' commentator Terry Bradshaw said during the
network's post-game show following the Dallas Cowboys' 38-21 victory
over the San Francscicso 49ers in the NFC Championship Game. ``My mike
is shaking. I'm nervous.''
	Bradshaw then turned to the post-game show's co-host, Greg Gumbel,
and jokingly said he felt like kissing him. ``If you were a little
better looking, I'd give you some sugar,'' Bradshaw said with a broad
smile.
	Starting next season, the Fox Network will broadcast NFC games, while
NBC continues to broadcast the AFC.
	CBS lost out to Fox in its effort to keep the NFC broadcast rights.
	``We don't have football at CBS any more, but we have the memories,''
a somber-faced John Madden said in a post-game farewell with play-by-
play man Pat Summerall.
	Madden also thanked Summerall ``for 13 great years.''
	The team had worked together for CBS for 13 years. Rumors are
circulating that they will be reunited on Fox next season, but that's
not certain. Summerall has said he has signed with Fox, but Madden has
been non-committal.
	``I'm very proud to have watched the NFL grow on CBS,'' said
Summerall, who has worked with the network for 32 of the 38 years it
covered pro football.
	Summerall then turned to Madden and said with a combination of humor
and sadness, ``I'm not going to tell you I love you, but I do like you a
lot.''
    
9.1373CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 24 1994 15:1914
>    Former Jets coach Bruce Coslet has picked up by the Bengals to be their
>    offensive co-ordinator.  Kind of ironic seeing how an ex-Bengal QB
>    helped get Coslet fired from the Jets.

FWIW, Boomer said on WFAN that he felt Coslett should not be fired.  He
was very pro Coslett in an interview with Mike and The Mad Dog, when
Mike and Dog were coming down very hard on Coslett.

Coslett got himself fired when he refused to get an o-coordinator....


'Saw


9.1374GWEN::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatMon Jan 24 1994 16:013
    WHat did Terry and Greg do?  I watched Pat and John and then switched
    to Primetime...
    
9.1375MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Mon Jan 24 1994 16:129
    Well, Greg kept biting his microphone to stop from crying.  Terry,
    obviously suffering from a concussion flashback brought on by Aikman's
    injury, rambled for a bit and then told Greg if he was any cuter
    (I think) he would give him some "sugar."  
    
    Greg was able to keep it together long enough to thank all the little
    people.  They then cut away before the group hug.
    
    Mike
9.1376GWEN::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatMon Jan 24 1994 16:292
    I wonder what Bryant would have said...
    
9.1377ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Mon Jan 24 1994 17:393
     Or Mussbuger, or Jimmy the Greek, or whats her face and even Irv
    Cross.
    
9.1378CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 24 1994 17:5613
I listened to Mike and the Mad Dog on the FAN today, from Atlanta while
I was out running errands at lunch.

Evidently Terry and Greg are pretty close friends, and that had something
to do with yesterday's sign-off.  Least that was M&MD's cut at it.

A guy I work with lives next door to Gumbel, and he's a really geniunely
sensitive guy, who's down to earth and quite caring.  (I don't want to
print a lot of Gumbel stories, since it would betray a confidence).

So, I'm not surprised that Greg was a bit sensitive yesterday.

'Saw
9.1379GWEN::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatMon Jan 24 1994 18:064
    I know they were buddies... but so are Pat and John and they handled it
    better.
    
    
9.1380FRETZ::HEISERshadowlandsMon Jan 24 1994 18:061
    Pat & John aren't men of the '90's though [sic].
9.1381GWEN::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatMon Jan 24 1994 18:103
    I thought Terry was the QB of the 70's though... around the time Madden
    was coaching...
    
9.1382FRETZ::HEISERshadowlandsMon Jan 24 1994 18:111
    but he was a real main when he wore the uniform.
9.1383CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 24 1994 18:164
Yabbut, you almost expect the weird and unexpected from Gumbel and Bradshaw
since they've been so silly ever since I can remember....

8^)
9.1384GWEN::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatMon Jan 24 1994 18:192
    Which is why I watch Gameday from 12-1... or Costas on NFL Live before
    he left.  Never really got into Greg and Terry.
9.1385METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Jan 24 1994 18:284
/er is being a weasly wimp. he won't give 10 points for someone taking Buffalo
in the SB.

The Crazy Met
9.1386QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Jan 24 1994 21:2513
      I never liked Bradshame, and I'm glad I missed his pass.  I would
    of laughed and hurled at the same time.  Hopefully FOX won't pick him
    up.
    
      I picked 'em wrong thised weekend.  Both home teams completely
    dominated the line of scrimmage.  I hope Buffalo wins it just because I
    dislike the cowpokes more (and the AFC is past due).  Then again, seeing
    Buffalo being losers of 4 staright SB's is appealing.
    
      I just hope its a good game.  I have a bottle of Champagne left over
    from the Holidays and was looking for a good excuse to pop it open.
    
      Tim
9.1387DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Mon Jan 24 1994 21:487
I'm pretty sure I read today that Bradshaw will sign with FOX.

It looks like Madden will profit nicely with FOx taking over the NFC. Rumors
are of a tripling in Salary for big john...

Metz
9.1388QUASER::JACKSONTABabe HockeyMon Jan 24 1994 22:0510
      re-Madden
    
      I liked how he & Summerall were spewing out how Leon Lett got his
    hand in to deflect a pass from Young and on and on,  then on replay it
    showed it was Haley, then all of a sudden its Haley spew and how he
    makes something happen every play and on...
    
     Don't most players make something happen every play?
    
     It made me laugh anyway......
9.1389DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Tue Jan 25 1994 11:115
    	So, how long is Montana's contract for? After the way he's
    	been in and out this year, I'd think that KC would be much
    	better off working with a good, young QB.
    
    	Scott
9.1390Madden signs with Fox38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 25 1994 14:2041
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Mon, 24 Jan 94:

--------
Subject: Fox signs Madden to four-year deal
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 94 10:03:31 PST
 
	NEW YORK (UPI) -- Ending weeks of speculation, 15-year CBS football
announcer John Madden signed a four-year contract with Fox Sports
Monday, according to David Hill, president of the network's sports
division.
	Madden, a nine-time Emmy Award winner and one of the most popular of
pro football's broadcast voices, will be the lead analyst for Fox's
coverage of the National Football League's NFC games.
	``I am happy to be with the Fox Network, and I look forward to
working with them,'' said Madden. ``I've spent 15 years covering NFL
football, mainly the NFC, and that is what I enjoy and want to be doing.
I met with (Fox chairman and chief executive officer) Rupert Murdoch and
was very impressed with his ideas and vision of television and football.
''
	From Dec. 18, when Fox officially announced its purchase of the
rights to televise NFC games for an unprecedented $1.58 billion, Madden
has been rumored to join Fox. In doing such, he will be part of the
network's new division that was created primarily to accommodate its NFC
coverage, said Jeff DeRome, Fox executive director for publicity.
	``John Madden is the heartbeat of football,'' said Hill. ``Fox Sports
is absolutely thrilled to know that our coverage of the game will be
brought to the American public by the best in the world.''
	In outbidding CBS for the rights to televise NFC games, Fox ended
CBS' 32-year hold on NFL television coverage. CBS' final game was its
broadcast Sunday of Dallas' 38-21 win over San Francisco in the NFC
Championship game.
	After coaching the former Oakland Raiders to seven AFC Western
Division titles and a Super Bowl victory over Minnesota, Madden joined
CBS in 1979. He excelled in broadcasting and was named ``Sports
Personality of the Year'' by the American Sportscasters Association in
1985 and 1992. Also in 1982, he became the first expert analyst to be
honored with the prestigious ``Golden Mike'' Award by the Touchdown Club
of America.

--------
9.1391The swami sez...ROCK::MURPHYIllini = overratedTue Jan 25 1994 14:2346
    Super Bowl Prediction:
    
    Dallas 147, Buffalo 10.   Buffalo scores the first field goal of the
    game after an impressive 98-yard drive, then scores on a last-minute TD
    using a Frank Reich-led hurry-up offense.  
    
    Dallas scores on each of its 21 possessions without ever attaining a
    first down, bringing up many comparisons to Georgia Tech's thrashing of
    Cumberland 222-0 in the 1930s.  This, despite the fact that every single Cowboy
    begins the game with at least one separated shoulder.  
    
    Emmitt Smith gains 683 yards, a Super Bowl and John Madden '93 Sega
    record, with 335 of those yards gained while still playing after suffering a 
    painfully broken pelvis early in the 2nd quarter.  Troy Aikman throws
    for 585 yards, eclipsing Norm Van Brocklin's record, but unfortunately is
    knocked out late in the 3rd quarter by a blitzing Daryl Talley.  Because of severe 
    concussion Troy is unable to participate in the postgame press
    conference because his speech center is destroyed, leaving him only with the
    ability to hum the UCLA fight song ad nauseum.  
    
    Jimmy Johnson later claims he wasn't trying to run up the score,
    although he is criticized by the media for leaving Emmitt in until the 3:14 mark of
    the 4th quarter.  The game is delayed for 45 minutes in the 3rd quarter,
    due to a freak accident.  A large buildup of static electricity is generated
    when the Goodyear blimp collides in midair with the guy who parachuted in at the 
    Holyfield-Bowe fight and the airship rubs against the Georgia Dome roof 
    fabric, with the effect being frighteningly similar to that achieved
    when rubbing a balloon on one's head.  This blimp-induced static discharge
    is of such enormous magnitude that Jimmy Johnson's hair actually is lifted
    off of its moorings.  Were the Goodyear blimp filled with hydrogen instead of 
    helium, the incident could have been much worse.
    
    Leon Lett misses the game, driving hopelessly around I-285 in search of
    the Georgia Dome.
    
    Highlight of the game:  After a rousing halftime celebration done up
    Dixie-style, complete with a star-studded ensemble of country musicians, the 
    Hooters women, and a Haiku reading by Minnie Pearl, John Wayne Bobbitt
    is given an Espy at midfield for Most SportsManlike Conduct after
    mentioning that despite Lorena's acquittal, John still has no hard feelings.  
    
                                         
    Well, that's my prediction.
    
    Murph
    
9.1393METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 25 1994 15:503
yo /er you're losing ground. spread is now 10.5

The Crazy Met
9.1394SPEED KILLS!35223::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverTue Jan 25 1994 15:519
    I think the Cowboys will cover the spread and much more.  IMO, after
    this game, people will be comparing this Cowboy club to some of the
    great teams in NFL history.
    
    Watch closely, I you won't see Bruce (I'm the Greatest) Smith lineup
    one time on the left side of the line.  Eric Williams will absolutely
    dominate any man one-on-one.  Ask Reggie White!
    
    - Rope
9.1395DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Tue Jan 25 1994 17:0112
Buffalos only chance is running the ball up the gut the same way they did
against KC. Sweeps will get them nothing. Dallas will score at least 24 points
against the bills and the Bills will need to match score for score against the
Boys.

Buffaloes defensive line will not be a match for the Cowboys o-line. For all
his ranting and raving about how he should be the NFL's defensive player of the
year it's put up or shut up time for Bruce Smith. I fully expect him to be
neutralized and the Cowboys to have an easy 24-10 victory.....

Metz
9.1396QUASER::JACKSONTAPay me $30mil to spewTue Jan 25 1994 17:0211
      re-1
    
      I thought this cowgirl team was already being compared/labeled one of
    the greatest ever, and they have only won 1 SB.  Of course most people
    are saying the Bills should just mail it in.
    
      If the Dall-ass defense stops Thurmal, then they stop the Bills!  No
    running game = SB loser.  The more you throw, typically the more
    tunrovers = SB loser.
    
      Tim
9.1397PTOVAX::JACOBprisoners here of our own deviceTue Jan 25 1994 19:1312
    What's this about Clinton nominating William Perry fer Secretary fo
    Defense????
    
    I mean, the Fridge may have been good in his day, but I don't think
    that he was GREAt and should therefore preside over the Nation's
    defense.
    
    Sheez is Clinton a jerk er what...he could have at least nominated Joe
    Greene ahead of Perry.....
    
    JaKe
    
9.1398only if Clarke and Thomas stayed out foul troubleCNTROL::CHILDSBetcha A$$ I hate DallA$$Tue Jan 25 1994 19:1613
best comment sunday was Summerall's after Dixon Edwards hit Waters....

 "Ricky better go back for another load of wood" hahahaa

 dallas in a romp like Rope said...

 pname bets taken


 Murph classic especially the crack about JJ.....

 mikey
9.1400Excellent Holtzian reply Tommy, kudos!CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Jan 25 1994 19:501
    
9.1402METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 25 1994 20:058
In the Giants-Bills SB the Bills were the better team. The Giants executed
their game plan almost perfectly - and that was to control the ball on the
ground. If Buffalo can do that - Thurman Thomas certainly is a great ball
carrier - they should keep it close and with a break could even win the
game. Dallas is a better team, but a well executed game plan could beat
them.

The Crazy Met
9.1403Another New Yuck team will bite the dust SundayPTOVAX::JACOBprisoners here of our own deviceTue Jan 25 1994 20:1211
    TCM,
    
    Ya fergot one factor in yer note -.1.  The Bills, even though Baffalo
    is far away from New Yuck City, are a "New Yuck" team, so the ol' bone
    in the throat is signed sealed and will be delivered on Sunday before
    84 zillion drunk and disorderly TV watchers, who will turn it off about
    halfway thru the 2nd qtr cause th Bills will be so far behind an act of
    God couldn't help em.  
    
    JaKe
    
9.1404METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 25 1994 20:146
uh Jakester, Giants didn't choke in their SB appearances. Now of course
there was this team that had a punt blocked late in the 4th quarter in
this years playoffs. Can you name that team????


The Crazy Met
9.1405PTOVAX::JACOBprisoners here of our own deviceTue Jan 25 1994 20:2023
    
>>there was this team that had a punt blocked late in the 4th quarter in
>>this years playoffs. Can you name that team????
    
    Lessee, was it the Giants...er no...the Oilers...er no...the 49ers...er
    no...uhm, err, the Vikings...er no, the Lions.....nope again....I
    dunno, sorta slips my mind at this time.
    
>>uh Jakester, Giants didn't choke in their SB appearances. Now of course
    
    I'm talking RECENT, like the year long bone-in-the-throat the Mucking
    Fets had....the Jets wonderful upswing at the end of the season....the
    Rangers-need I say more??....the Giants "close game" against the
    49ers...
    
    AND now the BIlls upcoming embarrassment in Atlanta on Sunday.
    
    4 Super Bowls in a row, 3 losses and the fourth coming fer Baffalo
    
    hahahahahahahaha
    
    JaKe
    
9.1406PTOVAX::JACOBprisoners here of our own deviceTue Jan 25 1994 20:205
    BTW, I'm talking the Rangers in the playoffs lasted year...not the
    current season.
    
    JaKe
    
9.1407METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 25 1994 20:2612
uh JaKe, you really are trying to forget. See the Rangers didn't even make 
the playoffs last year. It was the Penguins that choked lasted year
when they lost to the Islanders in 7 games.

Mets were plain bad last year - sort of like saying the 1985 and 1986 Pirates
choked. Now the 1992 Pirates in game 7 of the NLCS ...

The Crazy Met

btw somehow the Rangers will probably find a way to lose this year :-(
Messier, Graves, Leetch, or Richter will get injured in late March or
early April :-(
9.1408Sheesh, I though it was BARFalllo!CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Jan 26 1994 01:501
    
9.1409CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementWed Jan 26 1994 07:395
    My wife is staying in Atlanta this week and called me this morning to
    say that the Cowboys are staying in her hotel.  Said she saw Troy
    Aikman getting in a limo last night.  Sez he's GAWD!
    
    Mark_in_Taiwan. 
9.1410CNTROL::CHILDSBetcha A$$ I hate DallA$$Wed Jan 26 1994 11:406
 2 hits into the game and ole Thurmal Nukedout Thomas will be wavin' to the
 sidelines for K. Davis. Aikman is the real deal Tommy and with an ace in the
 hole like Emitt, the Bills don't stand a chance.....

 mikey
9.1411Thurman is a real deal too...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedWed Jan 26 1994 12:216
    I really think that its gonna be a better game than most think. When
    everyones thinking on the high and mighty cowboys to win don't be
    surprized. I mean this is Buffalos 4th SB appearance. There due to win
    or atleast make a game of it...
    
                     stig
9.141238346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 26 1994 12:215
9.1413JJ & Levy -- different approaches to the same goal38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 26 1994 13:1280
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (MIKE RABUN, UPI Sports Writer)
Subject: Super Bowl mind games begin
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 94 12:51:41 PST
	ATLANTA (UPI) -- Long before the real game starts, the mind games
begin at the Super Bowl. This year, they began on a Tuesday.
	``They have to have some frustration with the Super Bowl,'' Dallas
Coach Jimmy Johnson said, easing a subtle elbow into the ribs of the
Buffalo Bills. ``After all, they have lost three Super Bowls in a row.''
	``I tell the players I don't think of them in those terms,'' retorted
Buffalo Coach Marv Levy. ``And they shouldn't think that way, either. I
tell them I think they are one of the toughest-minded bunch of
individuals I've ever seen. Be proud of it.''
	Super Bowl XXVIII, the first ever to be played by two teams that met
the previous year, will present the same off-the-field contrast it did a
year ago. Johnson, the master motivator, will coach against Levy, the
professorial wordsmith who leaves it up to his own players to get
excited about the task at hand.
	``I think Marv has done a heck of job,'' Johnson said in assessing
his rival for next Sunday's game. ``To be able to get his team back to
this game year after year means he has done a great job.''
	``I don't study Jimmy Johnson,'' Levy said in return. ``I may study
Abraham Lincoln, but I don't study Jimmy Johnson.''
	The two coaches will not cross paths until they arrive at the Georgia
Dome Sunday for the climax of the professional football season. But the
marks they leave on their individual teams this week will go a long way
to deciding the outcome.
	Johnson and Levy both discussed a little of their coaching philosophy
Tuesday on what the National Football League calls Picture Day. All the
participants in next Sunday's game showed up at the Georgia Dome Tuesday
-- first the Cowboys and then the Bills -- to pose for photos and to
discuss whatever was on the collective mind of hundreds of writers and
broadcasters.
	Neither team conducted workouts Tuesday, but both will begin their
full-scale preparations Wednesday. Buffalo's practice sessions will be
held at Georgia Tech in midtown and the Cowboys will work at the
practice facility 30 miles to the northeast normally used by the Atlanta
Falcons.
	As the week before any game progresses, Johnson will do whatever he
can to not only boost the morale of his players but to deflate the
opposition. He freely admits it and that practice only intensifies for
the big games.
	His pre-game prediction of a win prior to last Sunday's meeting with
the San Francisco 49ers was an obvious example.
	``But I do believe every single game demands different approaches,''
Johnson said Tuesday. ``You have a different feel about what you have to
do to be successful.
	``I try never to have a negative approach. If I plant seeds, the ones
I want to plant are positive. The seeds I want to plant in the
opponent's minds are negative.
	``I want our guys to be totally focused. Work, plus attitude,
determines performance. You really can't do anything about how talented
you are. On a daily basis, we all have certain skills and talents. Over
a long period of time, we can improve those skills. But for today and
this week, our team has just so much talent.
	``Now, the two things that will cause your performance to vary are
your attitude and your work. I will make sure they work. But if they can
program themselves to be as positive as they can be, that will
significantly improve their performance.
	``So don't get too concerned about how talented you are. You focus in
on what your attitude is on a daily basis.''
	Levy, meanwhile, said he likes to stay away from any attempt to 
``psyche,'' his players.
	``I rarely use a psychological ploy,'' he said. ``We may show them a
very meaningful tape the night before the game or something provocative,
but we don't go around looking for it.
	``If somebody said something provocative about our team on television
or something, we might show it, but I've maybe done it three times in
seven years since I've been here.
	``What I think our approach this week has to be is to concentrate on
the game. All of the other things are the foam. The game is the beer. So
we're going to concentrate on our preparation and seeking to play at our
best and what we have to do against our opponent.
	``It doesn't make any difference if we practice in the morning or the
afternoon. It doesn't make any difference if we practice at Georgia Tech
or someplace else. What makes a difference is what we do when they tee
the ball up and it's kicked off.''


    
    
9.1414GWEN::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatWed Jan 26 1994 13:164
    Mark's in Taiwan, Vivian's in Atlanta during Super Bowl Week... Is
    there something wrong with this picture?  Mark, think your wife would
    switch places with you?
    
9.1416ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Wed Jan 26 1994 15:5413
     I'm a Dallas fan and if the Bills won I wouldn't be anymore surprised
    than you. But to say Aikman would fold with Bruce Smith or Cornelius
    Bennett breathing down his neck is not far off the mark. But ANY QB who
    was in this same situation would stand a good chance of folding. Most
    would throw intercepts, or fumble when hit. A young or a Randell would
    try and run but most would either eat the ball, force the ball or get
    hit and fumble.
    
    JJ knows this and got the players to protect Aikman and Aikman takes
    full advantage of this. Is this a sin? There are lesser qb's who even 
    with the time Aikman has wouldn't be as effective as he.
    Jim Kelly supposedly has a decent line protecting him but he threw 18
    intercepts, Aikman had 6. 
9.1417My mother could complete passesd with a great line in front of herOLD1S::SYSTEMWed Jan 26 1994 16:0310
	Name one great QB that didnt have a great line in front of him!!
None of them become great by themselves. Look at Montana this year. Not
having that great 9er line he had in the 80's has given him a year long
headache among other injuries. 

    Aikman has a great line and good receivers to throw, but it also
helps to have a great arm to go with it. 

Keith
9.1418Right Up The Gut...LUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Jan 26 1994 17:1227
      As someone said earlier, I think the key is for the Bills
      offensive line to physically push the Cowboys defense.  They
      MUST succeed at very quick runs right up the middle.  It is
      obvious that you have to have some success running and that
      running east to west is not how its gonna happen against Dallas.
    
      So run in such a way that defensive speed is minimized so much as
      possible.  Push the line back and hit the line of scrimmage FAST.
    
      I know it goes back a lot of years, but in 1967, the Pack played 
      the LA Rams in the playoffs (game before famous ice bowl).  The
      Rams were 11-1-2 having just come off an impressive anihilation
      of the then 10-0-2 Colts 34-7.  They had something like 9 sacks.
      The Pack were heavy underdogs against the Rams and their vaunted
      fearsome foursome (Deacon Jones, Merlin Olsen, Roosevelt Grier, and
      Lamar Lundy).  
    
      Well, the Pack hit the line of scrimmage before the Rams line was
      barely able to set up.  They sent Travis Williams up the gut in
      an instant.  The game was no contest - 28-7 Green Bay.
    
      I really think the Bills must succeed by having some push by their
      offensive line and gaining yardage right up the gut.
                  
      If they can't do that, its all over.  If they can, just maybe...
    
                                                     Tony
9.1419DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 26 1994 17:359
Tommy "the predictor" Brydie....

Let's hope your prognosticating skills are a little better than the guarentee
of UCLA's vistory over Wisconsin.....

Bills to cover...what a charlie brown prediction....

Metz
9.1420METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 26 1994 17:4414
>  Bills to cover...what a charlie brown prediction....

It can't be that easy of prediction. The spread keeps inching up. So 
at the very least most folks think the spread is too low. I happen to
agree that the Bills will cover. 

Key for me is will the Bills have lost the game before it ever begins.
In Denver's last SB appearance it seemed like the Broncos already knew
the game was lost before they took the field. If the Bills still believe
on Sunday that they can win then they need to hold on to the ball. Both
against GB and SF the big turning point came when Dallas scored after
a turnover to take a commanding lead.

The Crazy Met
9.1422DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 26 1994 19:0320
ah, the old pick on the spelling skills. A classic last resort when you have no
more ammo in the old six gun.

I meant it's a girly-mon prediction...Either pick the Bills to win or don't
bother making a prediction....A prediction to cover when there is nothing on
the line ($$$$$) isn't worth the time spent typing it in.

TCM...they only reason the line keeps moving up is because the public sees the
relative ability between the teams and knows a good thing when they see it. The
line would be moving down or staying the same if the public thought predicting
the winner was such a tough decision.

Metz

I'd like to see the bills win but it's not going to happen. Dallas in a big
way. The spread is insignificant in a super bowl game...



9.1424both only 1 week layoff before the SBFRETZ::HEISERshadowlandsWed Jan 26 1994 19:394
>    Giants 20 Bills 19. Tell the people who bet that game that the spread is
>    insignigicant.
    
    ...and the 49er-Bengals game too.
9.1425METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 26 1994 19:434
49er's covered in their first SB meeting with the Bengals (81 season?).
What was the spread in 1988 season?

The Crazy Met
9.1426FRETZ::HEISERshadowlandsWed Jan 26 1994 19:522
    I don't know, but wasn't the final 20-16?  That's the one I'm referring
    to.
9.1427METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 26 1994 19:563
They were both close games. I think 20-16 was the 1988 season's SB.

The Crazy Met
9.1429although Tommy manged to sweep the NOTY PITA awards...DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 26 1994 20:167
It doesn't matter how much you win by...what matters is that you win....


His pain in the assness,

 Metz
9.1430METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 26 1994 20:183
not always. just ask ND about that 7 point win against FSU.

The Crazy Met
9.1431FRETZ::HEISERshadowlandsWed Jan 26 1994 20:454
    I think there's a few errors in Tommy's last reply.  Houston isn't the
    only team to have not played in the Super Bowl.  You can add Cleveland,
    Seattle, San Diego, Phoenix, Detroit, Tampa Bay, New Orleans, and
    Atlanta.
9.1432DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 26 1994 20:545
Must have gotten the information from the Arizona media guide :-)


Metz
9.1433reading comprehension 101METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 26 1994 21:0910
MikeH no mistakes in what Tommy posted:

"We only have 1 team left in the playoffs that's never been to the
 big game...Houston."

The key here is the part - 1 team left in the playoffs - that statement
was certainly true.

The Crazy Met

9.1434PTOVAX::JACOBprisoners here of our own deviceThu Jan 27 1994 02:129
    Yeah, what TC(whatever) said, and look at the date of the reply Tommy
    posted, it's Jan 11th.
    
    Tweren't talking about
    all-time-never-made-it-to-the-Super-Bowl-whining-sore-losers, just
    about the teams that was left in the playoffs.
    
    JaKe
    
9.1436I said also...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedThu Jan 27 1994 12:123
    re -1. read note .1411.
    
              stig
9.1437not a factor this year...TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Thu Jan 27 1994 12:226
Little-known fack:
No team that won in their first Super Bowl appearance
has ever been beaten in a subsequent appearance.

dr.a
9.1438Dallas 30 Buffalo 13 CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Jan 27 1994 12:341
    
9.1439FRETZ::HEISERshadowlandsThu Jan 27 1994 12:577
>     just about everyone else does. Other than TCM and Tony Barbieri, I have 
>     yet to hear from a single person who doesn't expect Dallas to blow Buffalo
    
    I guess it was previously missed, but I may as well stand and be counted.  
    I expect Buffalo to cover and have a very good chance at winning it
    outright.  There's a local guy that says, "No want no steenkin points,
    don't need no steenkin points.  Bills are gonna win."
9.1440I like the matchups...TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Thu Jan 27 1994 13:1918
On paper, it's a close game.
At QB, both have two solid performers.
If a big edge exists anywhere, it's on the offensive line for the
'Boys.  Newton and Williams outweigh the Bills' line on their own.
But take your pick from the lists below:

QB	Kelly/Reich	Aikman/Kosar
RB	Thomas/Davis	Smith/Geisic(sp?)
TE	McClelland	Novacek
WR	Reed/Brooks	Harper/Irvin
	Beebe
DL	Smith		Jeffcoat/Haley
LB	Talley/Bennett	Norton
ST	Tasker		Gant

Considering Aikman and Smith are likely dinged, I like the Bills' chances.

dr.a
9.1441JJ's Top 5 reasons why he said the Cowboys would beat SF38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 27 1994 15:4228
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Wed, 26 Jan 94:

--------
Subject: Johnson reveals reasons for forecast
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 94 15:38:51 PST
 
	ATLANTA (UPI) -- When Dallas Coach Jimmy Johnson said last week prior
to the NFC Championship game that, ``we will win the ballgame,'' he said
there were various reasons he chose to make the prediction.
	After Dallas did beat San Francisco, Johnson said he did it chiefly
to ease the tensions he thought were building up in his own team. But
there was more to it than that.
	Johnson gave the Dallas Cowboys' public relations director a note
before the San Francisco game, listing the reasons for his actions. He
asked the PR man to make the list public if the Cowboys lost because
Johnson did not plan to stay in Dallas long enough to explain.
	That list was made public Wednesday. His reasons, listed in order,
were:
	1 -- I believe it.
	2 -- Game is at home.
	3 -- Takes pressure off players.
	4 -- Gives players bottom-line, no-excuses attitude.
	5 -- May fertilize seeds of doubt in 49ers.
	And then Johnson added a note.
	``If we win, maybe it gives us an edge,'' he wrote. ``If not, I can't
get any lower so I don't give a damn what people think.''

9.1442Bradshaw going to Fox38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 27 1994 15:4223
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Wed, 26 Jan 94:

Subject: Bradshaw reportedly also moving to Fox
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 8:56:25 PST
 
	NEW YORK (UPI) -- Terry Bradshaw reportedly is the latest broadcaster
ready to move to the Fox Network.
	New York Newsday reported Tuesday that Bradshaw has agreed to join
Fox as co-host of its National Football League pre-game show and an
announcement could come as early as Thursday.
	Bradshaw reportedly will receive $650,000 annually in a four-year
deal.
	Fox announced the signing of veteran commentator John Madden Monday
to a four-year deal worth a reported $30 million. Reports also indicate
that Madden's longtime partner, Pat Summerall, also will be moving from
CBS to Fox with a four-year deal worth $1.5 million annually.
	Bradshaw, the former Pittsburgh Steelers star quarterback and a
member of four Super Bowl champions, has been a co-host on CBS' ``The
NFL Today'' pre-game show for three years.
	Fox, which secured the National Football Conference package with a
bid of $1.58 billion over four years, also reportedly is close to deals
with veteran CBS producers Bob Stenner, Sandy Grossman and Ed Goren.
9.1443METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 16:293
hmm, report I saw had Bradshaw doubling the 650K he was getting at CBS.

The Crazy Met
9.1444too funnyMETSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 16:307
Anyone else see Shaughnessy's article about Atlanta's sports venues
in Tuesday's(?) globe. In it he basically says Boston is way behind and
does a pretty good bash job. This from the guy who wrote that article
glorifying Boston and denigrating St. Louis a while back. Would
be nice if he made up his mind.

The Crazy Met
9.144538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 27 1994 16:352
    TCM, I'm surprised at you (well, not really).  How does Shaughnessy
    saying that Boston > St.Louis invalidate him saying Atlanta > Boston?
9.1446LAGUNA::MAY_BRPhoenix Open HostageThu Jan 27 1994 16:367
    
    Not having read the article, I'd say comparing a city that is preparing
    for the Olympics and the SB, to a team isn't going to get either in the
    near future, is an unfair comparison.  Compare Atlanta's facilities 3-4
    years ago, beffore Atlanta built up for the Olympics.
    
    brews
9.1447megabucks for everyoneFRETZ::HEISERshadowlandsThu Jan 27 1994 16:372
    makes you wonder where Fox is getting all this $$ that they're throwing
    at everyone.
9.1448the tone of the article as much as anything elseMETSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 16:414
nah, its just in that original article Shaughnessy was extolling Boston's
virtues as being one of a few world class cities.

The Crazy Met
9.1449METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 16:4313
re: .1446

Brews,

Sure the comparison in that sense is not fair. One of the major points
in the article was that Atlanta has a Business-Government Sports Committee
which encouraged things like the Georgia Dome and raising funds for the Olympic
bid, etc. Ittook a very short time for them to go ahead and sign-off on these
things. On the other hand he was complaining that in Boston it is likely to
take years and years to even agree on projects like these, much less build
them.

The Crazy Met
9.145038346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 27 1994 16:466
9.1451Haven't you caught on to the guy yet, TCM?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 27 1994 16:577
              
    What's really surprising is that, like those rubes from Saint Lou that 
    wrote nasty, bigoted letters back to the Globe, TCM actually took that 
    exaggerated tongue-in-cheek (albeit lame) Shaughnessy column seriously...
    
    glenn
    
9.1453METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 17:195
Mac, the guy should make up his mind - if he really has one.

Tommy pretty much got the point. You didn't.

The Crazy Met
9.1454Desperately wanting Buffalo; low expectations...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 27 1994 17:2329
>     All I'm telling you is that I expect this game to be a lot closer than
>     just about everyone else does. Other than TCM and Tony Barbieri, I have 
>     yet to hear from a single person who doesn't expect Dallas to blow Buffalo
>     away. Myself, I expect Buffalo to cover and possibly win.
    
    Tommy, I have no desire to get into a another LDUC, as anyone is
    entitled to change his/her mind (as I have on the Cowboys' prowess
    with an obviously near-100% healthy Emmitt Smith), but I am legitimately
    interested as to why you now think that Buffalo's defense will provide 
    any match at all for the Dallas' O, when a week ago you thought that 
    after the way the Cowboys manhandled Reggie White and Co. that the 
    Bills wouldn't see a much better fate.  Kansas City was your #2 team 
    in the NFL, or at least the best shot to beat Dallas, no?
    
    I don't think that Buffalo can't cover; hey, that's a coin flip and as
    Green Bay proved can easily happen even in a blowout with a couple 
    backdoor scores, but as far as being able to win, I think you had it 
    right the first time.  A lot of this stuff about Troy Aikman being 
    vulnerable if pressured sounds identical to what I heard last 
    year.  What's really changed, personnel-wise?  Jim Kelly still stands 
    to be the guy under the heavy pressure and making the critical mistakes.  
    The Bills surely won't commit even half the number of last year's 9 
    turnovers, but I still don't see it being enough.  As much as I'll be
    rooting for Buffalo to win, I just can't see it even if they play
    almost out of their heads...
    
    glenn
    
9.1455DECWET::METZGERTo sleep, perchance to dream...Thu Jan 27 1994 17:4021
>  I don't think that Buffalo can't cover; hey, that's a coin flip and as
>    Green Bay proved can easily happen even in a blowout with a couple 
>    backdoor scores

which is why I got on Tommy's case with his meaningless Charlie Brown
prediction of the Bills to cover. He has since clarified that he thinks the
game will be a close one and they might even win which says a heck of a lot
more than "I think they'll cover."

I don't see the difference between last year. Bruce Smith didn't do squat and I
don't see anything different this year. Dallas ran right at him last year and
they'll do it again. Third and long will equate to 3rd and 2 this game because
the Cowboys will be ripping off huge chunks of yardage on 1st and 2nd downs...


Metz




 
9.1457DECWET::METZGERTo sleep, perchance to dream...Thu Jan 27 1994 17:5215
not to mention a lack of  kids activity days and a nice tourist waterfront area
(esp for a city made out of beach front fill).

The aquarium is great, Science museum adequate, good public transportation, the
parks (the few their are) are good (during the daytime).

Throw in a woeful lack of parking, poor direct driving access to most
everyplace,  lack of a real city central place  and not very clean.

I guess for an old US city it has it's charm (mostly due to history) but the
political hackery will always prevent it from the revamping it needs to be
first class and attract the major events (superbowl, national political
conventions, Olympics, major presidential conferences...etc)

Metz
9.1458METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 17:5823
Bills will try a different game plan than last year. This is basically the same
Dallas team as last year and Buffalo should have a good idea what won't work;
they also played earlier this season, Emmit Smith did not play. The Bills
O line should be able to puncture some holes for Thomas to run through. Kelly
will need to concentrate on short passes (ala the 49ers in the past). As long
as the Dallas offense does not have the ball they can't score. Bills need to
play the kind of game that the Giants played against them in the 1990 SB.
As long as Buffalo can keep it close into the 4th they have a chance. 

I also think the Bills D will play better than last year - heck how could 
they play worse? They should be fast enough to string out the pursuit, 
absolutely mandatory they get this done in the 1st quarter. After that Dallas
may be forced to change their game plan and then Buffalo throws the blits into
the equation.

No turnovers! If Buffalo turns the ball over 2-3 times they are cooked. Bills
have to claw at the ball when Dallas is on offense; they need to make the 
receivers and the running back(s) "feel some pain".

Rooting for Buffalo, but they need to play a perfect game (see Villanova
against Georgetwon in 1985)

The Crazy Met
9.1461It's a done deal. Go with Dallas!KALI::MORGANThu Jan 27 1994 18:155
    Until reading all this fawning over the Bills prospects, I thought 
    Buffalo and the points might be a risk worth taking!  Thanks for giving
    me a slap upside the head and the sense to go with Dallas guys!
    
    					Steve
9.1462OLD1S::SYSTEMThu Jan 27 1994 18:176
	RE. 1460

  Is that a P-name bet or for something more lucrative?

 Cadzilla2
9.1463DECWET::METZGERTo sleep, perchance to dream...Thu Jan 27 1994 18:2016
You don't get it do you Tommy?

Even the statement "Buffalo will cover" by itself is about as meaningless as it
gets....

suppose the cowboys are up by 17 points..buffalo goes down the field and score
with 2 seconds left on the clock...Yippeee...buffalo covers. It doesn't mean
the game was good or exciting or close. It just means buffalo covered the point
spread and tommy's prediction was right...

Saying you expect a good close game that goes down to the wire with buffalo
having a chance to win it is expressing a meaningful opinion. Stating buffalo
will cover is not.


Metz
9.1464METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 18:285
> Stating buffalo will cover is not.

Unless you're betting.

The Crazy Met
9.1465DECWET::METZGERTo sleep, perchance to dream...Thu Jan 27 1994 18:315
as I mentioned earlier...


Metz
9.146638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 27 1994 18:337
9.1467WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MMark Matthew Jr. 6lbs 6 ounces.Thu Jan 27 1994 18:3310
    
    
    
         I'm gonna go out on a limb here.... :-)
    
    Dallas  51
    Buffalo 13
    
    
    Chap
9.1469Good point about that mindset differAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billThu Jan 27 1994 18:348
    Tommy that last note of yours has started to convince me to perhaps
    take a chance on he afc for the 10th time in a row.
    
    That neighbor of mine that owes me a sawski from the series will be
    anxious to go with dallas but will hate giving points.
    
    I'll have to call him - got nothing to lose haven't seen the $10 since
    oct. anyway
9.1470METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 18:376
Bill the Elder,

hold off until tomorrow or Saturday, spread could keep going up and it is 
very unlikely that it will come down.

The Crazy Met
9.1471DECWET::METZGERTo sleep, perchance to dream...Thu Jan 27 1994 18:379
well...why the hell didn't you say so instead of just sprouting off...


you're betting that the bills will cover...not stating that the bills will
cover...

Metz
 
9.1472METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 18:394
Metz, stating/betting sort of the same thing. Betting is a stronger
statement than just saying it.

The Crazy Met
9.1473DECWET::METZGERTo sleep, perchance to dream...Thu Jan 27 1994 18:4611
Not in my mind..betting means you're rooting for a team to score some
meaningless points at the end of the game so that you can win some cash.

Stating something means that you have an emotional investment instead of
financial and you be happier if the bills put forth a good effort and keep the
game close and aren;t worried about meaningless points scored in the final
minute...


Metz
9.1474DYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverThu Jan 27 1994 18:4611
        <<< Note 9.1460 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

    >> The 'Boys think that they just have to show up. Buffalo is coming
    >> to play. 
    
    Tommy, you should've added a big IMO after those statements!  To the
    contrary, JJ will have this bunch wired by game time.  Mark my words.
    
    - Rope

    
9.1475Ba-doom!@@CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Jan 27 1994 18:486
    Tommy,
    How much money did ya lay on the Celtics to win the NBA title.
    I wanna get in on this action...
    
    MikeL
    
9.1476ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Thu Jan 27 1994 18:524
    >> If you keep the ball away from the Dallas offense they won't score.
    
         They didn't have any problem getting around that last year. The
    way to get around it is for your defense to score.  :-) 
9.1477METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 18:545
see comment about turnovers.

HtH

The Crazy Met
9.1479CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Jan 27 1994 18:557
>
>     Suppose we all sprout antlers and start rooting around in the snow for 
>     food.
>


huh-huh, huh-huh-huh, that would be COOL.....
9.1478METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 27 1994 18:566
worst scenario:

Dallas wins and Kosarends up playing a big part in it. Besides eating Crow,
we get to hear from all the Dallas fans and Hal!

The Crazy Met
9.1480ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Thu Jan 27 1994 18:571
     Only the MOOSE can do that effectively
9.1481Got nothing to say reallyKIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutFri Jan 28 1994 12:0013
    Well it's 2 days to go and a faraway fan like myself is usually
    psyching myself up for SBS but I can't seem to get up for it. I think
    of the Bills players & feel they must be the same. Hope they stuff 
    Emmitt up Aikman's ass & they both get carried off. Can't stand all
    the 'greatest (insert player position) ever to pull on a jersey.'
    
    Better be entertaining or i'll have to stop despising the Bills &
    feel sorry for them instead..........NOT !
    
    Now if only the Bills players were as masculine as British football
    players :^)
    
    Davie.
9.1482CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 28 1994 12:1411
Davie,

Even a nearby fan like myself can't get up for it either.  I'm py
for all the Dallas and Buffalo fans, but to me it's "same old same old".

I'll watch the game and do what I do a lot of times in games where I
don't have a big interest -- I'll pick a position and watch it for a
few plays.  That's kind of fun, especially the interior linemen....


'Saw
9.148338346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 28 1994 12:265
    'Saw is just experiencing the clinical depression brought on amongst
    Giant fans who consider the Cowboys to be their biggest rival, coupled
    with the anxiety of a New-Yorker wannabe seeing a real New York team
    (as opposed to one those faux NY teams from Jersey) making it to the
    big dance.
9.1484yawnCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 28 1994 12:302
Nah, I agree, this one is nothing to get too hot about.  It's gottne to the point 
that I almost expect Supe blow outs...
9.1485Brewers droop- Nah; Superbowl droop.KIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutFri Jan 28 1994 12:4611
    On the subject of fans:
    			   I don't accuse Cowboy fans of jumping the
    bandwagon but can't fail to see that during JJ's early days he was
    considered to be a bit of a tit. Now he's a genious. How's that ???
    Secondly, during those times the NFL notes file on the 'boys had
    about 11 entries in total. After they post a SB win there's over
    500? notes. My dictionary must have another meaning for 'fan'. I don't
    post many notes in the Dolphin file 'cause no-one gives a toss (sniff!)
    The Cowboy fan factor is making me dislike a good football team.
    
    Davie the whiner.       
9.1486CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 28 1994 12:5019
No, I'm not bummed that the Giants are not there.  I really didn't
expect them to be there.

I'm just not super up for the game, because neither of the teams
is a team I really like. 

It wouldn't matter to me if it were Dallas Houston, or Dallas KC
or San Fran Buffalo...  I'm just not heavily hanging on every
word coming out of Atlanta or really paying all that much
attention.

I enjoyed the season, I enjoyed most of the playoffs and I'll
watch the Super Bowl (and probably the left tackle most of the
day).


Baseball starts soon!

'Saw
9.1487SI Jinx - I hopeMETSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jan 28 1994 12:537
Emmet Smith is on the SI cover. Here is hoping that the SI jinx strikes
again.

fwiw Zimmerman predicts 24-17 Dallas.

The Crazy Met
9.1488they were saying the same stuff 3 weeks agoFRETZ::HEISERmy kid beat up your honor studentFri Jan 28 1994 12:572
    This has all the makings of a big upset or highly competitive contest. 
    Just look at this year's Orange Bowl.
9.1489This from a 9 straight afl pickerAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billFri Jan 28 1994 13:0613
    Well, I'm going out on a limb and picking the Bills outright.  At
    first, I thought it was hopeless simply because of the quality of the
    'boys play Sunday.
    
    But, with previous victory at Dallas and short week, health of bills
    and overconfidence of Dallas I'm getting more and more confidence in
    bills.  I'm looking for bills to go out with 2 td lead and cowboys to
    make a late run and game to be decided by fg.
    
    curious to see what London spread is as well as Ontario Lottery line
    is.
    
    billte
9.1490Buffalo 38 Dallas 35FRETZ::HEISERmy kid beat up your honor studentFri Jan 28 1994 13:061
    
9.1491METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jan 28 1994 13:085
Agree on the FG spread. But, 38-35? Dallas offense will have the ball
too many times. Bills need to use a grind it out offense and use up the
clock. 27-24 Bills

The Crazy Met
9.149238346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 28 1994 13:297
9.149338346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 28 1994 13:353
9.1494My daughter's 1st grade teacher's in the halftime show!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 28 1994 14:1211
    > This has all the makings of a big upset or highly competitive
    > contest.
    
    No, this has all the makings of yet another extremely dull and
    one-sided game.  If past Super Bowls have taught us anything it's that
    teams that have lost Super Bowl games tend to continue to lose Super
    Bowl games.  More recent history also shows a clear NFC dominance, and
    quite frankly I see no evidence to prove that trend is reversing.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.1495I got spare cash to invest - if the odds are right! ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYFri Jan 28 1994 15:209
    
    
    	Yabbut does anybody have the odds that the announcers will use the
    word "Outstanding" more than 20 times in the first quarter?  That's
    where the real action's gonna be!
    
    I remain,
    carnac_for_Kev
    
9.1496They're also the team people love to hateCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Fri Jan 28 1994 15:2413
>>         <<< Note 9.1485 by KIRKTN::DWALLACE "The Lure 'O the trout" >>>
>>                   -< Brewers droop- Nah; Superbowl droop. >-

>>    Secondly, during those times the NFL notes file on the 'boys had
>>    about 11 entries in total. After they post a SB win there's over
>>    500? notes. My dictionary must have another meaning for 'fan'. I don't
    
Davie,

I agree with some of what you say, but not every note in the Cowboys
topic is entered by a fan.

Jerry
9.1497man those super superalivesAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billFri Jan 28 1994 15:316
    Kev,
    	Last year with Enbert and Trumpe (I hope I have that right) the
    cliches were flying fast and furious.  I think some producer had a
    script for em to follow
    
    Who is it this year announcing?
9.1498CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopFri Jan 28 1994 15:342
 Al, Dan and Frank, if I'm not mistaken....
9.1499ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Fri Jan 28 1994 15:511
    I don't watch much AFC contests so who the hail are Dan and Frank?
9.1500Maybe he was hit in the chookiesKIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutFri Jan 28 1994 15:599
    Jerry,
          I know this but still thought i'd bitch about it a little :-)
    I'd love to give you a description of how i think the game will go
    but there doesn't seem to be any point this year somehow. I meant
    to ask someone this; whilst watching my first SF game of the season
    (SF v NYG) I realised that Rickey Watters was not only a loud mouth
    pain in the arse but he was almost cross-eyed ! Any info.......
    
    Davie
9.1501And Frank Gifford has me beat by a decade or twoAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billFri Jan 28 1994 16:2110
    .1499
    	I assume that is Frank Gifford and crew, Michaels and Dierdorf are
    the others.
    
    	Not exactly Dandy Don and the (insert favorite adjective here)
    Howard Cossell (I liked him in the 60s on radio then he became a
    caricature of himself)
    
    For me though this crew beats nbc and cbs crews (not being a fan of
    madden at all)
9.1502ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Fri Jan 28 1994 17:091
     Frank G. doesn"t work for NBC he works for ABC. 
9.1503METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jan 28 1994 17:124
Last year was Madden and Sumerall.
This year is Enberg and ?? on NBC

The Crazy Met
9.1504NBC last yearCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Fri Jan 28 1994 17:156
NBC carried the Super Bowl last year.  Who can forget an almost-in-tears
O.J. trying to interveiw Jim Kelly.

I'm not sure about it this year.

Jerry
9.1505NBC.....Again!ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Fri Jan 28 1994 17:162
     Oh No, not again! Probably Trumpe, Enberg.
     Last year was also Trumpe, Enberg, not Madden and Summerall.
9.1506METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jan 28 1994 17:184
Thats right. In the last TV contract the NFL gave out 3 of th4 SB's. NBC
then got the 4th one - some bidding process.

The Crazy Met
9.1507FRETZ::HEISERmy kid beat up your honor studentFri Jan 28 1994 18:011
    Anyone know the last SB underdog to beat the spread?
9.1508TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Fri Jan 28 1994 18:062
gotta be the '91 Bils (only one l back then)
dr.a
9.1509Giants-Bills?MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Fri Jan 28 1994 18:075
    I would think whoever was the underdog in the Giants-Bills game. 
    I don't remember who was favored, but if it was the Giants, they
    didn't cover.
    
    Mike
9.1510ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Fri Jan 28 1994 18:141
     I believe the Billls were favored but I don't remember how much
9.1511pas yearsJURAN::WESTFri Jan 28 1994 18:427
    
    note 1509  Giants were 7 point underdog vs bills in 91...
    in 89 Cincinnati were 6 point dogs vs San Fran and covered 20-16
    
    how far shall we go back....I think before that all were blow out
    to 82....where San Fran was a dog to Cinn and won outright.
    
9.1512MKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursFri Jan 28 1994 18:555
	I have inside info that says TCM is praying for a 35-9 Buffalo win.
	(Or even a 29-25 Dallas win)


	billl
9.1513same score, twice, haunt them foreverFRETZ::HEISERmy kid beat up your honor studentFri Jan 28 1994 19:292
    I changed my mind on the last score.  Dallas will lose this one the way
    they lost their last one: 35-31.
9.1514cast in stoneFRETZ::HEISERmy kid beat up your honor studentFri Jan 28 1994 19:331
    ...and Da 'Boys are on SI this week.
9.1515'Da BoysSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Jan 28 1994 19:535
Yuck,

	I hate saying this, but Da Boys in a romp.  31-7.

	Flying Zamboni
9.1516ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Fri Jan 28 1994 20:567
     They were on SI a few times last year.....didn't work. 
    
     	This Dallas team has to practically give the game away(read
    at least 5 turnovers) in order for the Billlls to win. This is
    certainly possible since we saw 9 last year but I don't think this
    senario will happen again this year. I look for this game to be simular
    to when Washington whipped the billlls a couple years back.  
9.1517MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Sun Jan 30 1994 02:006
    billl,
    
    yabbut, switch those scores in favor of Buffalo.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1518MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Mon Jan 31 1994 00:597
    30-13 Dallas win. Darn turnovers, and a few more yards on the final
    drive to cover the spread :-(.
    
    Great second half by Dallas.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1519is buffalo gonna make it 5 in a row next year???SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedMon Jan 31 1994 01:176
    the turnovers by buffalo turned into 17 pts. for dallas which was the
    difference in the score...but there was a turnover by dallas which
    buffalo scored too... a team like dallas scares me because they are so
    young. looks like another dynasty...
    
               stig
9.1520Thurman sticks his head in the sand.CADSYS::CAVEMon Jan 31 1994 01:4115
	I have to comment on Thermal's poor performance and I'm not
talking about the fumbles.  That 2nd fumble was huge and totally changed
the game.  However, it was only a few minutes into the second half and
the game was TIED!!!  So Thermal goes to the sidelines and puts his head in
the sand.  That is totally unacceptable.  He barely played after that due to
cramps? (more likely attitude).  He should have sucked it up and tried to
make up for it.  The Bill's were outplaying the Cowboys to that point and
Thermal had already conceeded.  It has to hurt the team when your main
offensive weapon gives up even though the score it tied and there is
plenty of time left.

Alan


9.1521MKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursMon Jan 31 1994 11:026
	I was wondering how many times Buffallllo was going to try that
	little shovel pass play.  I recall them doing it about 5 times, 
	with a net gain of about 1 yard.  Duhhh!


	billl (not a fan of the Billlls)
9.1522CSTEAM::FARLEYMon Jan 31 1994 11:2612
    
    
    	Yabbut the phone company's changed the area code for Bufallllo.
    
    
    
    Oh four four
    
    
    ;^)
    
    
9.1523CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 31 1994 11:5218
I couldn't help but wonder, if the Bills hadn't have lost three previous
Super Bowls, if those turnovers would have hurt as much.

They were playing well in the first half, taking advantage of little
Dallas mistakes, and then in the second half, Thurmon fumbles and next
thing you know, they go to pieces.

How much of it could have been the "Oh no, here we go again" feeling?


First half was a good game, second half was pretty boring.


Oh, and btw, I thought that 90% of the ads were excellent, especially
the Wavy Lays one.....


'Saw
9.1524DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Jan 31 1994 12:019
    	I know one thing, if I were coach of the Bills, Thermal would
    	be in my dog house. So, the guy goes out and fumbles. I can
    	live with that. But, then, he spends the rest of the game
    	sitting on the bench (more or less), holding his head, feeling
    	sorry for himself.
    
    	Gimme someone with less talent and more guts and I'd be happy.
    
    	Scott
9.1525SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesMon Jan 31 1994 12:1617
	I think Levy saw how Thurman reacted after the second fumble.
He didn't agree with it and sat him down. Then the use the old
suffering from leg cramps routine. Give me a break, just say Thurman's
he the dog house and was benched.
	Anyone else agree with me that Marv Levy and his entire staff
should be fired this morning? Buffalo might make it to a fifth straight
SB, but they are not going to win with Levy as the coach. That shuffle
pass play was useless all day, so they kept using it. The other play
I hate of Buffalo's is that delayed handoff to Thurman. Any idiot can
see it doesn't work against Dallas. Thurman is practically standing still
when he gets the ball and he has no momentum when he starts running.
So Dallas was stuffing it most of the day. Buffallllo should have
run more run plays with Thurman 5 yrds deep. Hand him the ball in a full
run and let him find the holes. It seems to work with Dallas and Emmitt.

Ron
9.1526CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopMon Jan 31 1994 12:276
IMO the Woodstock Pepsi Ad was the best of the day........

BudBowl sucked as usual except for the Basher getting thrown out....

mikey
9.1527Marv Levy... da man's a jeenyus...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 31 1994 12:2920
    
>	I was wondering how many times Buffallllo was going to try that
>	little shovel pass play.  I recall them doing it about 5 times, 
>	with a net gain of about 1 yard.  Duhhh!
    
    Through the drunkenness we spent much of the second-half trying to
    devise still more innovative ways for Marv Levy to pick up one yard 
    with the highest complexity possible (hey, the game degraded so 
    quickly-- I thought that this time by making it to halftime we might 
    finally be home free, but Buffalo just postponed it a quarter).  
    Stuff like direct snap to the halfback, flea-flicker to Kelly, shovel
    pass to the tackle eligible.  The football was spending way too much
    time in Buffalo's backfield, both on that shovel pass trap play and
    the usual running plays out of the shotgun, where it looks like the
    back has to run into the QB and change directions before he even gets
    started upfield.  At some point when you're getting your head kicked in
    you do have to throw the ball upfield and risk the turnover...
    
    glenn
     
9.1528And the Sabres also lost yestiddayCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Jan 31 1994 12:3213
    I agree that Buffallllo's coaching staff should be gonzo. Hell,
    once Dallas adjusted (took 'em long enough) and stopped the
    short pass, the billlls had no alternatives. Once the game
    was tied at 13, the billlls went into panic mode and fell
    apart. Thurnover comes up big in the Supe again.
    
    MikeL
    
    P.S.
    What prize do ah get for correctly predictin the actual score(30-13)??
    
    
    
9.1529MKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursMon Jan 31 1994 12:377
>>  What prize do ah get for correctly predictin the actual score(30-13)??

	You get to keep the one that you keep saying you are going to send me.



	billl
9.1530CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 31 1994 12:3815
Buffalo didn't go long often enough to open up the Dallas D.  So the Dallas
D closed down.

I also think that when you are playing against speed like the Boys you have
to turn that into their disadvantage, but devising and running plays that
make them commit heavily to one action -- ie getting them to overrun the
play etc etc.  Not easy, but it can be done.


I still wonder, if this were there first meeting, if it were Buffalos first
time in the Bowl, if they would have folded so quickly in the second
half.  It's like they just said "oh well, here we go again".....


'Saw
9.1531METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballMon Jan 31 1994 12:517
Bufallo started losing it at the end of the first half. Driving with
the ball with a little time left and not throwing it to the end zone trying
for a TD. Instead they run the ball and kick a field goal. 17-6 looks
a lot different than 13-6. Then they get the ball to start the 2nd half and
who knows what could happen. bah humbug!

The Crazy Met
9.1532CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Jan 31 1994 12:569
    Nah billl,
    I'll send you da one you deserved. Since I don't trust Decsnail
    since losing mah first prize I sent ya, send me your home address
    via mail(if you're inclined) or ah'll arrange to meet ya and
    give it ya in person..
    
    OK?
    MikeL
    
9.1533KALI::MORGANMon Jan 31 1994 12:573
    What do John Bobbit and the Bills have in common?
    
    They both lost the last four.
9.1534CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Mon Jan 31 1994 14:3525
Thoughts on the game - I can't beleive I actually watched the whole thing:

o Put me on the Thermal is an a$$ bandwagon.  He quit after his fumble.
  If I were a Bill, particularly a defensive player, I would have puched
  him in the face after the game.  No excuse for that.  I'd trade his a$$, I
  don't care how good he is.

o Buffalo started strong on D.  Their strength is their speed, but Dallas
  likes to run tackle-to-tackle.  To counteract this, they put enormous
  pressure on the center of the Dallas o-line.  They crowded two linemen
  in the middle - virtually on the center, and relied on linebackers to 
  stop anything outside.  Worked like a charm, so of course they got away from
  it.  Actully, Dallas adjusted well, and eventually wore the Buffalo D out.

o Football in a dome still sips.

o My favorite commercial was the one where Cindy Crawford was transformed to
  Rodney Dangerfield, from a lack of Pepsi.  Melanie liked the one were the 
  monkey was driving the car.

o Is there a female performer anywhere uglier than Winnona Judd?

more later

=Bob=
9.1535took the wind out of their sailsFRETZ::HEISERlittle bit of compassion isn't enough to heal my painMon Jan 31 1994 14:522
    The Bills looked liked they quit after the 2nd Thomas fumble.  It was a
    decent game up til then.
9.1536BUNCH OF GIVE-UPS - BILLSSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Mon Jan 31 1994 15:4421
    
    	Thomas should be traded!  Another Byner deal???  could be but I'd
    	let him go anyway.
    
    	Give Kelly some credit.  It looked like he was the only one trying
    	to play the game with less than 2 minutes left.  Poor guy must have
    	been hit over a dozen times.  I'd almost think of letting the whole
    	offensive line go just for not trying!
    
    	Troy Aikman looked like crap.  I would have pulled him after the 
    	first half and put a real QB in there.
    
    	No way Bills can make it back next year!
    
    	Don't think the Boys will make it back next year either.  I look
    for a GB vs Browns SB next year.
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
    
9.1537CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 31 1994 15:5246
>    	Thomas should be traded!  Another Byner deal???  could be but I'd
>    	let him go anyway.

For me, it's not so much that he fumbled twice, although you do have to
look at his abyssmal SB record, but that he caved and gave up immediately.

There is no glory is giving up.  None whatsoever.  I could have respected
him if he'd sucked it up and gone back out there to TRY.  There is a 
certain angst and a certain glory is perservering against all odds even
if you lose.   But to just QUIT.....



>    	Give Kelly some credit.  It looked like he was the only one trying
>    	to play the game with less than 2 minutes left.  Poor guy must have
>    	been hit over a dozen times.  I'd almost think of letting the whole
>    	offensive line go just for not trying!

I give Kelly a lot of credit.  He never quit.

    
>    	Troy Aikman looked like crap.  I would have pulled him after the 
>    	first half and put a real QB in there.

Then it probably would have been Buffalo's first SB win.....8^)

    
>    	No way Bills can make it back next year!

That's what everyone said last year.  But you might have a point.
If Houston hadn't taken the gas pipe (or make that Warren Moon taking the
gas pipe) against the Chiefs, who knows if Buffalo would have made it...
    

>    	Don't think the Boys will make it back next year either.  I look
>    for a GB vs Browns SB next year.

Dallas has plenty of talent, but it's like a new pitcher coming into the
league -- after a while folks develop ways to defend against you....

They stand a good chance, but they're not a lock.....


'Saw    
    

9.153838346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 31 1994 15:567
9.1539MKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursMon Jan 31 1994 15:566
	Did you happen to notice they put Bernie in to take the last 
	"kneel-down" of the game.  He'll probably get some big bonus 
	for "taking a snap" in the SB.


	billl
9.1540DECWET::METZGERTo sleep, perchance to dream...Mon Jan 31 1994 16:0424
That's cause Troy already had his helmet off and was sporting the Champions
baseball cap. Plus he was probably trying to  find the cameras to say I'm going
to Disneyworld to.


I didn;t get to see a whole lot of the game (chatting, trying to  keep the kids
entertained in the middle of a party) but it was pretty obviuos that the Cowboy
offensive line was the  dominant force in the 2nd half. They ran the play where
the left side pulls and emmitt follows them 5 times in a row  at one point and
buffalo  couldn't do anything to stop them....it was typical NFC East power
football.

I predicted 24-10 so I wasn't far off. I was amazed that buffalo couldn't
adjust to deeper routes after  Dallas took away the short game. Emmitt is a
great back  but a  lot of other  backs  could be great running behind that
line.Nice moves by both Thomas and Smith and the touchdown runs.

Tommy must still be nursing his hangover :-)


Metz


9.154138346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 31 1994 16:105
9.1542re. I'm going to DisneyAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billMon Jan 31 1994 16:367
    I noticed that jimmie told Bill Clinton that he would be fishing for a
    few days then jjones said "He's speaking for himself, I'd love to go to
    the White House".
    
    Though johnson wasn't actually declining a visit
    
    
9.1543FRETZ::HEISERlittle bit of compassion isn't enough to heal my painMon Jan 31 1994 16:409
    I don't see how you can blame everything on Thomas.  The game was still
    *tied* after his 2nd miscue.  The problem with the Bills is that they
    let Thurman's Self-Pity Party affect the whole team.  Levy should've
    only sat him out 1 series and made him go back in there.  Thurman's
    biggest mistake was quitting when they still had a chance.
    
    You have to guess that the Bills were carrying so much emotional
    "SB-loser" baggage that they fell apart with 1 blunder.  You would
    think professionals would have more determination than that.
9.1544CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Mon Jan 31 1994 17:349
    What a suck game.  Beebe running out of bounds when he could have
    reached the 1st down marker.  He obviously didn't know the spread.
    
    Wotta rat.  They coulda covered.
    
    It woulda served the Dallas fans (at the party I went to, anyway)
    right, they were unbearable.  I hate the Cowboys...
    
    _GSH_
9.1545ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Mon Jan 31 1994 17:394
    >> I hate the Cowboys...
    
    Why? When the niners were winning their fans were just as "unbearable",
    same with the Steeler fans.
9.1546METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballMon Jan 31 1994 17:415
I agree with .1544 there is just something about the Cowboys and the
America's Team crap thing that makes them particularly loathsome.

The Crazy Met
 
9.1547even after he tells them, they still don't knowFRETZ::HEISERlittle bit of compassion isn't enough to heal my painMon Jan 31 1994 17:464
    The Phoenix-equivalent of Mike & the Mad Dog just loves to rank on
    Cowgirl fans, especially since he was on the air for a year in Big D.
    His favorite thing to do is ask them all who their all-time leading
    scorer is.  It's amazing how few of them know.
9.1548ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Mon Jan 31 1994 17:504
    Actually it has to do more with winning than anything else. If they
    were perennial losers nobody would give a @h%$ about America's team
    crap. If it is just that label that bothers so many folks then that is
    more a personal problem then anything else. I love it!  :-) 
9.1549CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 31 1994 17:5521
>    Actually it has to do more with winning than anything else. If they
>    were perennial losers nobody would give a @h%$ about America's team
>    crap. If it is just that label that bothers so many folks then that is
>    more a personal problem then anything else. I love it!  :-) 

No.  I think it's the Bandwagon thing.  It's like all the Cowboys 
paraphernalia you see on folks who obviously don't know the first thing 
about football.

That's part of it.  

I've never know anyone who was ambivalent about the boys.  They either
liked them (mainly because they won a lot) or else they hated them.

The true Cowboy fans still wore the stuff when they were having those
atrocious seasons late in the Landry years.  Those are the folks I
respect, not the new faux fans....


'Saw

9.1550METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballMon Jan 31 1994 17:568
> Actually it has to do more with winning than anything else

nope. Look at the 49'ers from 1981 through today. One heck of a run yet
folks do not have the kind of passionate dislike for them as they do for
the Cowboys. It is more than just winning. Probably has something to
do with the Cowboy fans being particularly obnoxious.

The Crazy Met
9.1551FRETZ::HEISERlittle bit of compassion isn't enough to heal my painMon Jan 31 1994 18:113
    Bandwagoners are everywhere, but for some strange reason they seem to
    flock to the Cowboys.  Most Cowboy fans I know today were MIA or AWOL when
    they were 1-15.
9.155238346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 31 1994 18:156
9.1553Another hated Cowboy fanOLD1S::SYSTEMMon Jan 31 1994 18:1826
	Your darn right America's team crap. How many times does it have to be
stated that the DALLAS COWBOYS had nothing to do with creating that label. NFL
Properties, in their infinite wishdom placed that label on the team after it
outsold all other teams in sports items licensed by the NFL. Is it the Cowboys
fault that people like to buy items with the Cowboy name on it? 


	I don't doubt that many of you can't stand Cowboy fans.  I've run into
several I can't stand my self. Some people can tend to go overboard when their
team happens to be kicking the tail of the rest of the league. As stated earlier
the fans of team that happen to be hot at the time tend to rub it in. I can
give you many examples from this notefile if necessary aka Browns/Steelers
,Raider/Broncos and many more. 

	I always tend to think what goes around comes around to haunt you like
going 1-15 etc. But what the heck you guy's are going to go on hating them , so
what the heck. Heres to a long and continuous hate and a threepeat to boot. Go
Buffalo make it five in a row!!!


 Cheers!!!

 Cadzilla2

	
9.15543 Straight in Miami DYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverMon Jan 31 1994 18:2318
>>nope. Look at the 49'ers from 1981 through today. One heck of a run yet
>>folks do not have the kind of passionate dislike for them as they do for
>>the Cowboys. It is more than just winning. Probably has something to
>>do with the Cowboy fans being particularly obnoxious.
    
    Face it, it has more to do with Dallas winning and winning consistently
    but for a 5 year period in the 80's.  The Cowboys have a tradition of
    winning that's been going on for nearly 30 years now.  7 Super Bowls, 4
    Wins.  They're cocky and know they are the best team in football right
    now.  If free agency doesn't dismantle this club, the sports world
    better get used to the sight of Jones and Johnson accepting the
    Lombardi award for the next few seasons.  This team is young, hungry,
    and scary.
    
    DEAL WITH IT AMERICA: COWBOYS ARE CHAMPS!!!
    
    - Rope
    
9.1555METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballMon Jan 31 1994 18:333
no it has more to do with notes like .1554 than almost anything else.

The Crazy Met
9.1556Who says dynasties have to be likable?NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 31 1994 18:3838
    WARNING-- the following is not an indictment of our true-blue in-house 
    Cowboys' fans, or anyone else who by any reasonable standard can be
    considered a "real" fan:
    
    I heard an interview with a reporter from Dallas a couple of weeks ago
    and he claimed that even in the Cowboys' heyday in the 1970s it was 
    common knowledge that many of their fans in attendance just didn't have 
    much of an idea of what the hell was going on in the games.  The "least 
    knowledgeable fans in all of football" was the specific term he used.  
    Basically at that time Texas Stadium was a playground for the oil-rich 
    and famous during the boom years in Texas, with the see-and-be-seen 
    philosophy firmly entrenched, and it showed.  The fans just knew that 
    the 'Boys were kicking most of the league's butt, and even if they 
    didn't have much interest in the nuts and bolts of the game they too 
    projected that arrogance.  Then when the team started to fall apart, 
    suddenly plenty of tickets became available to see this "greatest 
    franchise in football", to the point where the Cowboys were no longer 
    selling out their games, something you'd never see happen to teams 
    like the Steelers, Bears, Redskins, Eagles, Giants, etc.  
    
    Frankly, this was the very impression that I always drew of the Cowboys'
    fans when I was at a more impressionable age.  Obviously it didn't
    speak for all of their millions of fans nationwide, but this flashiness
    and extravagance was certainly what one saw on the tube every other
    Sunday when the Cowboys were featured.  That made them and their fans 
    hateable.  Let's face it, the Cowboys themselves played up all of this 
    to the hilt.  It was a hell of a marketing approach.  TV can be a very 
    dangerous influence on our nation's youth... ;-)
    
    In Jerry Jones the tradition lives on.  I'll immediately gain respect
    for Jimmy Johnson (and that takes some nose-holding) if he dumps this
    pretentious SOB and leaves him high and dry without a coach.  It
    probably won't make much difference in the Cowboys' immediate fortunes,
    but it'd be nice to see nonetheless.
    
    glenn
    
9.1557AMERICA'S TEAM (does have a nice ring to it, no?)DYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverMon Jan 31 1994 18:4420
  <<< Note 9.1555 by METSNY::francus "Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football" >>>

>> no it has more to do with notes like .1554 than almost anything else.

>> The Crazy Met
    
    What?  Celebrating a win?  Cheering a team on?  Being a bit rowdy
    after your team (BTW, I was  FAN during the 3-13, 1-15 years) wins
    their 2nd WORLDS CHAMPIONSHIP???
    
    GIMME A BREAK.  Take it to the Whining Sore Losers Note.  Alot of
    people I'm sure started to like Dallas in the 70's because they were on
    TV nearly every Sunday at 4:00 PM.  They've got the sharpest uniforms
    in the league and just look crisp.  Add the fact that they win often
    and you're going to have your share of people that jump on the
    bandwagon.  Nothing wrong with that.  I'll dance with 'em even if they
    weren't around 5 years ago.
    
    - Rope
    
9.1558Tough to hate this bunch...DECWET::METZGERTo sleep, perchance to dream...Mon Jan 31 1994 18:5419
I  disliked the cowboys of the 70's and early 80's. I was exstatic when Joe
threw the pass to dwight Clark that knocked the boys out.

that being saaid...

I sort of like this group. Aikman and smith look like they are having alot of 
fun. I know Irvin certainly is. The o-line just runs over people and the
players aren't afraid to speak out. The defense is a bunch of interchangeable
parts with nobody claiming to be the best player in football on it (Mr Bruce
Smith he of the 4 tackles yesterday) and everybody knows their role on the team.

The coach is funny and a great motivator and can take a joke and the players
love him. 

The only boob is the owner....


Metz
9.1559CSOA1::JACOBThurman Thomas=NFL's Barry Bonds!!!Mon Jan 31 1994 19:005
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
9.156038346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 31 1994 19:423
    A New York Mets fan complaining about obnoxious fans.  Being from New
    York, I guess he knows obnoxiousness when he sees it.  In my mind there
    is noting more obnoxious than a Yankees/Mets/Giants fan.
9.1561different mindset Mac when you ARE the Capital of the WorldMETSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballMon Jan 31 1994 19:586
When everyone roots against the NY teams their fans don't
take umberance at it, rather they GLORY in it. NY'ers have always believed 
that the rest of the country wants to stick to 'em so they might as well
be obnoxious - makes no real difference.

The Crazy Met
9.1562typecast?HBAHBA::HAASI Shun You, Version 3 for WindowsMon Jan 31 1994 19:597
>    ... In my mind there
>    is noting more obnoxious than a Yankees/Mets/Giants fan.
        ^^^^^^

A little moderator type freudian slip there, Mac?

TTom
9.156338346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 31 1994 20:152
    Ya caught me TTom, there are few noters more obnoxious than Chappy,
    TCM, and Mike Childs ;^)
9.1564METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballMon Jan 31 1994 20:174
But then we have to toss in one Pittsburgh fan and one Boston fan into
the mix. And that doesn't even include our esteemed MtM.

The Crazy Met
9.1565From the West Coast...GWEN::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatMon Jan 31 1994 20:275
    Not reading through all these... nice call Mike...
    
>   <<< Note 9.1438 by CTHQ::LEARY "Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions" >>>
>                          -< Dallas 30  Buffalo 13   >-
    
9.1566DYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverMon Jan 31 1994 20:3125
    More game analysis.
    
    How 'bout that "roughing?" the kicker call that went against Dallas in
    the 2nd quarter that gave Buffalo the first down!  That was so lame it
    was pathetic.  The Dallas defender barely touched the guys leg (rolled
    into it) and the punter went down in a heap.  That surprised me that
    the officials were that nit-picky in such a big game.
    
    Bruce Smith stated that if Dallas went one-on-one with him that it
    would be a long day for Dallas.  You have to give him credit, he got
    the long day part correct - wrong team however.  Smith was a non-factor
    being held to 4 tackles, 1 assist, and no sacks.  To his credit, he
    helped cause the 2nd quarter INT by grabbing Aikman's shoulder as he
    was throwing the ball.
    
    Bennet had an excellent day for the Bills.  Jeff Wright on DL also
    played great.
    
    For Dallas you have to give credit to the entire defense.  They all
    looked sharp.  I was concerned in the 1st half at the lack of pressure
    they were getting on Kelly.  In the 2nd half, they made an adjustment
    and decided to take away the underneath stuff.  Buffalo never
    countered.
    
    - Rope
9.1567AKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billMon Jan 31 1994 20:4612
    I had this brilliant idea that I should find someone to take Dallas +10
    and GIVE ME 10:1 odds.  Thought that sounded good for awhile.  Glad I
    stayed totally financially independent of this game.
    
    Was it confirmed that Thomas just quit or was he benched just so Levy
    and the boys would have a chance without too many giveaways?
    
    Dallas is more rootable than the old Landry teams; very professional
    outfit.  Can't compliment a team any more than comare em  to 60s
    Celtics.
    
    Bill
9.1568FRETZ::HEISERlittle bit of compassion isn't enough to heal my painMon Jan 31 1994 20:519
>    and decided to take away the underneath stuff.  Buffalo never
>    countered.
    
    The last sentence speaks volumes.  They didn't respond when Dallas tied
    the game, they started playing not to lose.  They didn't respond to
    Dallas' adjustments.  They didn't even stick with much of what was
    successful in the first half.  Shuttle pass?  gimme a break.  It was
    like, "We're gonna use this until it works!"  that's for practice, not
    the Super Bowl.
9.1570PTOVAX::JACOBThurman Thomas= NFL's Barry Bonds!!!Mon Jan 31 1994 22:559
    
    >>						In my mind there
    >>is noting more obnoxious than a Yankees/Mets/Giants fan.
    
    Only thing I cain think of that's MORE obnoxious is dem Rugby
    fans/players!!!
    
    JaKe
    
9.1571PTOVAX::JACOBThurman Thomas= NFL's Barry Bonds!!!Tue Feb 01 1994 00:317
    what's the similarity between the Buffalo Bills and hashish?????
    
    
    Both get smoked in a Bowl!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
9.1572PTOVAX::JACOBThurman Thomas= NFL's Barry Bonds!!!Tue Feb 01 1994 03:068
    BILLS:==Boy I Love Losing Super_Bowls
            -   - -    -      -
    
    
    Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
    
    JaKe
    
9.1573Everybody's a winner now...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedTue Feb 01 1994 03:545
    The Cowboys will have to dismantlewith free agency knocking at there
    door. There won't be dynasty's like there used to be. What is Dallas'
    cap at now???Way over I would imagine.
    
                 stig
9.1574MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Feb 01 1994 11:3535
	Regarding the roughing the kicker call:  it was a correct call.
	It certainly appeared to me that, while not a big hit, there was
	enough of an impact that it would have caused the kicker to lose
	his balance.  It wasn't a bad call by the officials.

	Regarding Bruce Smith:  remember that he had to come out of the
	game for about 2 series early in the second half.  At that point,
	the Dallas offense moved completely away from his side of the field
	in the second half.  The way they dominated was to RUN, away from
	Smith, after a cut block on Cornelius Bennett.  Smart strategy,
	excellent halftime adjustment, but in my mind wasn't something you
	can complain about Bruce Smith.  It's like saying Deion only had
	1-2 passes per game defended.  Well, most teams just don't throw
	in that direction.  In the first half, when Dallas directed more
	of their attack in that direction, Smith had good success against
	Tuinei.

	Regarding the shuffle pass:  it certainly didn't gain any yardage,
	but was helpful, especially in the first half.  Remember that a lot
	of Dallas' advantage comes from its team speed.  This is a play
	very similar to a screen pass to keep the Dallas defensive line
	honest.  It was obvious that the screen was even less effective vs.
	the Cowboys line than this play was.  Moreover, Kelly was 13-16 in
	the first half, as I recall, and (I believe) this play may have been
	a factor in keeping a big pass russ off him.

	Having said all that, I think Dallas won because they have a much
	bigger offensive line that wears down and punishes opposing defenses;
	because the Buffalo secondary is too slow too cover when the LB's
	are forced to blitz situations; and because the Dallas defense is
	just too fast for most teams.  The type of offense that will beat
	Dallas is one like the Giants in the late 80's or the Raiders of the
	late 70's -- grind out the yardage in small chunks with a big line
	and hard hitting, up-the-middle type running backs.  Dallas' defense
	could be worn down by this type of offense (IMO).
9.1575CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopTue Feb 01 1994 11:438
 Dallas was under what the cap was being proposed to be before signing
 Aikman, now I'm not sure. I thought that their payroll was around 27 million
 and the cap was expected to be 31 or 32 million. Now they say the cap maybe
 higher. Remeber most of these guys are young so they really don't have any
 big time contracts other than Aikman, Smith and probably Haley....

 mikey
9.1576CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 01 1994 11:4816
>    is noting more obnoxious than a Yankees/Mets/Giants fan.
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This clearly shows a lack of general knowledge about fans of New York
teams.

I think TCM would back me up when I say that these are quite different
species, and to lump them all together would be like saying that
all Dogder, Giants and Yankees fans were the same, back in the days
when NY city had three baseball teams.   NY fans would definitely
take umbrage at that.....


'Saw


9.1577NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 01 1994 12:2115
> I think TCM would back me up when I say that these are quite different
> species, and to lump them all together would be like saying that
> all Dogder, Giants and Yankees fans were the same, back in the days
> when NY city had three baseball teams.   NY fans would definitely
> take umbrage at that.....
    
    Yes, believe it or not, I think that when they're winning (which
    thankfully has been less often than not), the Mets/Jets breed tends 
    to be more obnoxious than the Yanks/Giants.  Possibly because they're 
    still upstarts, in need of constant attention when those teams do 
    something right... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
9.1578CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 01 1994 12:2922
>    Yes, believe it or not, I think that when they're winning (which
>    thankfully has been less often than not), the Mets/Jets breed tends 
>    to be more obnoxious than the Yanks/Giants.  Possibly because they're 
>    still upstarts, in need of constant attention when those teams do 
>    something right... ;-)
    
Well, yeah, that's kind of the way I've felt.

Plus, what I've noticed is that, obviously, in this area, there are
a lot of fans who root for the Red Sox in Baseball, and the NY Giants
in football.  Those folks don't tend to be too obnoxious at all, because
of the dual nature of their fandom.

It always has seemed to me that most Giants fans from the NY area are
also Yankee fans, whereas Jets fans tend to be Mets fans, but I could
be wrong....

Just an observation though.....


'Saw    

9.1579METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballTue Feb 01 1994 14:107
Back to the NFL. 4 of 5 of the Cowboys O-line are free agents. Cap will
probably be around 34 mil. Dallas will probably have a hard time signing
all of them; under the NFL cap a team cannot spend anything they want to
resign their own players. Also Michael Irvin has one year left on his contract
and he wants mucho bucks.

The Crazy Met
9.1580METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballTue Feb 01 1994 14:173
Tommy watch Day 2. I don't remember him mentioning any vacation.

The Crazy Met
9.1581FRETZ::HEISERMost Objective Analyst(tm)Tue Feb 01 1994 14:432
    What's even funnier is that Hal and Tommy are never out at the same
    time.
9.1582CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 01 1994 14:457
>    What's even funnier is that Hal and Tommy are never out at the same
>    time.

Yabbut, I've met both Hal and Tommy, and if they're the same person, you'd
better believe it'd be worth a Lifetime Achievement Academy Award for Makeup 
if they were really the same person......

9.158338346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 01 1994 14:546
9.158438346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 01 1994 14:585
9.158538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 01 1994 15:065
9.1586FRETZ::HEISERMost Objective Analyst(tm)Tue Feb 01 1994 15:222
    Well 'Saw, Eddie Murphy pulled it off in one of his movies ("Coming to
    America", I think).
9.1587NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 01 1994 15:5010
    
> Dallas will probably have a hard time signing
> all of them; under the NFL cap a team cannot spend anything they want to
> resign their own players. Also Michael Irvin has one year left on his contract
> and he wants mucho bucks.  
    
    I thought Michael Irvin also signed a big contract earlier this year?
    
    glenn
    
9.1588METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballTue Feb 01 1994 15:533
nope, Irvin finished the second year in a 3 year deal.

The Crazy Met
9.1589CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 01 1994 16:046
>
>    Well 'Saw, Eddie Murphy pulled it off in one of his movies ("Coming to
>    America", I think).
>

Good point there Mike.  I remember that now.....
9.1590DYPSS1::ROPERCan't Buy Me LoveTue Feb 01 1994 16:069
    Both Jones and Johnson believe they can sign everyone and still be
    under the cap.  I believe as a team they are around 31 million right
    now.  The new cap is expected to be around 38-39 million I believe. 
    Johnson was also quoted in todays paper as saying Dallas would
    concentrate on proven free agents more so than the draft this year. 
    His thinking was that a rookie wasn't going to do much for this team at
    this juncture.
    
    - Rope
9.1591CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 01 1994 16:0727
9.1592not too much...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedWed Feb 02 1994 03:013
    the salary cap i believe is 34mil...
    
                stig
9.1593CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 12:3210
The Pro Bowl is turning into the No Show Bowl.

A couple of the Bills and a few of the Cowboys backed out.  Phil Simms
backed out yesterday, as it looks like he's going to need some shoulder
surgery.

Rodney Hampton was added to replace Emmitt Smith.


'Saw
9.1594They're expressing political feelings and fears! ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Feb 02 1994 12:4916
    
    
    	Yabbut it's all because of those girly-mon's are skeered just
    because there was a little rock 'n roll in Hawaii yesterday!
    
    	They're also boycotting because Hawaii's state song is by Carly
    Simon , "I feel the earth move under my feet" and it discriminates
    against the pedantilly_challenged! (is that the right word?)
    
    	Apparently, the student body @UMass Amherst is coordinating
    the boycott!
    
    I remain,
    wondering how the surf's performing there
    Kev
    
9.1595CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 12:528
re .-1:


	Need I make a stronger case for the need to be ever
	vigilant for Space Aliens taking over regular people?


8^)
9.159638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 02 1994 13:081
    Who ever said Kev was regular people?
9.1597Is Kev related to Princess Numa? 8^)CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Feb 02 1994 13:131
    
9.1598When are we going? REAL SOON!!TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Wed Feb 02 1994 13:4310
My desk calandar says that on Feb 1 1968, Vince Lombardi resigned
as Coach of the Packers.
I was far too young to have followed the story ;-)
so could somebody fill me in?
Why?
Did he go directly to the 'Skins?
Who took over the Pack?  D.Devine or someone else?

dr.a
9.1599CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 14:0735
>                     -< When are we going?   REAL SOON!! >-

Classic stuff....


	John Gant fell on his head.  He's dead.



>so could somebody fill me in?

I'll try.

>Why?

Not positive, but my guess was that he figured that the talent at Green
Bay was aging, he probably also felt that he had done what he set out to
accomplish, and that new challenges awaited elsewhere.

>Did he go directly to the 'Skins?

Sort of.  If memory serves me correct he "retired", then went to the
Skins, but I believe it was the next season.   He died sometime in 1970.


>Who took over the Pack?  D.Devine or someone else?

I believe it was Dan Devine, yes.


Sorry if it is sketchy, but it's been a while and my NFL Encyclopedia is
at home....


'Saw
9.1600NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 02 1994 14:148
        
> Who took over the Pack?  D.Devine or someone else?
    
    Actually I think it was Phil "I knew Lloyd and you're no Lloyd"
    Bengsten..
    
    glenn
    
9.1601anyone have the list of free agents?FRETZ::HEISERgimme a dollar or gimme 50 centsWed Feb 02 1994 14:151
    
9.1602Tommy watchMETSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballWed Feb 02 1994 14:193
Day 3.

The Crazy Met
9.1603CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 14:3014
>> Who took over the Pack?  D.Devine or someone else?
>    
>    Actually I think it was Phil "I knew Lloyd and you're no Lloyd"
>    Bengsten..
    
Bingo.  Yes, you are CORRECT sir.....

It was Bengsten for a few years and then Devine I believe....

I'd have to look stuff up at home to be sure.....


'Saw    

9.1605METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballWed Feb 02 1994 14:513
yabbut, the Bills didn't lose until Sunday.

The Crazy Met
9.1606But it was Mazur who almost got cooked by the mikeAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billWed Feb 02 1994 15:195
    Glenn that makes two today for you, did the mirth muse visit you?
    
    The Bengtsen also coached our Pat's nestcepas?
    
    
9.1608METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballWed Feb 02 1994 16:337
wooooaaa there.

> I realize that it is exceedlingly rare that I am ever wrong about

hahahahahhahahahaha

The Crazy Met
9.1609PTOVAX::JACOBWed Feb 02 1994 19:0417
    
    >>	They're also boycotting because Hawaii's state song is by Carly
    >>Simon , "I feel the earth move under my feet" and it discriminates
    
    Twas Carole King, not Carly Simon who did that song.
    
    Re Pro Bowl--who cares about it anyways, it's only a way fer football
    haids to slide into withdrawal fer the rest of winter and the spring.
    
    The possibility of getting hurt and missing time becuase of the pro
    bowl is higher than any other sport.  Unless yer talking Pete Rose
    slamming into home.  Even Hokey uses no checking during their all-star
    game.  What, maybe they should make the pro bowl 2 hand touch, played
    on the beach, to avoid any possibility of major injury.
    
    JaKe
    
9.1610Lombardi StuffSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Feb 03 1994 11:5324
      Yes, it was Phil Benston who was the defensive coordinator.
    
      Lombardi moved up to the front office.  He remained in Green
      Bay that year and then went on to coach the Redskins.  Having
      come from New York, he did like the east coast.  Also, his
      wife Marie really wanted to go back east.
    
      I believe Lombardi led Washington to a 7-6-1 record or maybe
      7-5-2 and thus held onto never having coached a losing season.
      He had cancer just before the start of the next season and that
      was that.
      
      Jerry Kramer wrote a book on Lombardi (after his death) and one
      thing that really struck me was how denied the Redskins players
      felt.  They had just wished they could have had Lombardi for
      many more years as the Packers had.  Sonny Jurgensen for example,
      really took losing Lombardi hard.  He finally felt he had the
      chance to play for a championship caliber team.
    
      I'm not sure how long Bengston lasted, but Devine came after,
      followed by Bart Starr, Forrest Gregg, Lindy Infante, and now
      Mike Holmgrem.
    
                                                  Tony
9.1611CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 03 1994 11:5612
One thing that is impressive about Lombardi, at least from my point
of view, is how the tenets that he coached applied so well to life.

All but one of the championship Packers have gone on to become
VERY successful in later life....


If you ever want to read an inspirational book, with some good rules
to live by, pick up _Run_To_Daylight_ and give it a read....


'Saw
9.1612CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Thu Feb 03 1994 12:3711
I remember a story about Lombardi told by Sonny Jerguson.  It recounted
an incident that occurred while Lombardi was coaching Washington.

I some game, Jerguson threw an interception.  The interceptor had
a clear shot to the goal line with the exception of Sonny.  Sonny,
who was never known for his mobility, ran him down and prevented the
touchdown.  When asked about it later, he said something to the effect
that "The other guy was just running for a touchdown, I was running
for my life."

Jerry
9.1613Bills were robbed!FRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Fri Feb 04 1994 14:494
    A controversy has surfaced over Buffalo's final series in the SB. 
    Those that have reviewed the tapes say the Bills didn't get a 3rd down. 
    While it wouldn't change the game, gamblers that picked the Bills to
    cover are irate.
9.1614CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Feb 04 1994 14:5415
>    A controversy has surfaced over Buffalo's final series in the SB. 
>    Those that have reviewed the tapes say the Bills didn't get a 3rd down. 
>    While it wouldn't change the game, gamblers that picked the Bills to
>    cover are irate.

That might explain why Beebe ran out of bounds.  If he thought it was
second down, he wanted to stop the clock.

I wasn't watching closely, but I do remember it seemed out of character
for Beebe to do something like that on 3rd down -- he's usually a heads-up
player....


'Saw

9.1615I'm officially retracting my Crow cuz I said they would coverFRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Fri Feb 04 1994 15:021
    
9.161618889::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Fri Feb 04 1994 16:005
    Jim Kelly spiked the ball on third down.  It wasn't on the tapes 
    because NBC was showing Jimmy Johnson's hair winning the Gatorade
    battle.
    
    Mike
9.1617CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Feb 04 1994 16:145
>    Jim Kelly spiked the ball on third down.  It wasn't on the tapes 
>    because NBC was showing Jimmy Johnson's hair winning the Gatorade
>    battle.
    
OH.......
9.1618PTOVAX::JACOBFri Feb 04 1994 19:1110
    
>>for Beebe to do something like that on 3rd down -- he's usually a heads-up
>>player....
    
    I remember his "heads up" play in the Monday night game .vs. the
    STEELERS, when Gary Brown whacked him into another astral plane fer a
    while.  Loved that hit!!!
    
    JaKe
    
9.1619Where's SnideAir?CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Feb 17 1994 14:376
    Heard a snipet on ESPN this AM that the Jacksonville Jags are
    talking with Lou Holtz about the haid coaching job..
    Anyone hear anymore?
    
    MikeL
    
9.1620Now appearing for Snide...the other MikeCNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 17 1994 15:555
 I heard the same rumor.....Wouldn't be surprised to see ole Lou jump
 ship again. Again when the heat of investigation looming....

 mike
9.1621There was a UPI articleCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Thu Feb 17 1994 16:098
I just read a UPI article that said the Jags were considering Holtz.
Holtz was unavailable for comment.

Didn't Holtz coach the Jets for a year or so, and absolutely flop?
Seems like he didn't like coaching the pros nearly as much as he
likes college.

Jerry
9.1623couldn't happen to a better programFRETZ::HEISERask me about my vow of silenceThu Feb 17 1994 16:291
    Yeah Holtz seems to leave when he hears the footsteps coming.
9.1624CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Feb 17 1994 16:4913
    What investigation?
    
    There's none planned that I know of.. All the merde in the book has
    died a just death. If there was anything going on, we'd have heard
    about it. Holtz' contract is up after '95 so who knows what his
    immediate plans are. 
    
    Holtz coached the Jests in '76. That's a long time ago and maybe he
    changed his mind. 
    
    MikeL
    
    
9.1625DZIGN::ROBICHAUDTonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkankThu Feb 17 1994 17:077
	Holtz has a hard enough time winning with what is without a doubt, 
year after year, the most talent laden squad in division IA football.  Put 
him in the NFL where the balance of talent is more equitable and he will 
not last a full season.  HUGE mistake by Jacksonville if they hire this 
charlatan.

				/Don
9.1626And Holtz may not be NFL haidcoach materialCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Feb 17 1994 17:218
    HAHAHAHAHA with the stock anti retort.
    
    How come Michigan and FSU had overall, the top rated talent-laden
    classes over the last 15 years?
    One team has no banners, the other got a late XMas gift...
    
    MikeL
    
9.1627CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 17 1994 17:515
the book has only been pushed aside cause it's good ole ND...the flagship
of all that's supposedly good with the NCAA......

mike
9.1628Holtz happy in South Bend38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 18 1994 17:1962
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Thu, 17 Feb 94:

--------
Subject: Holtz: I'm Happy With Irish
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 94 17:21:05 PST
 
	INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- The NFL expansion Jacksonville Jaguars, who
reportedly caught the interest of Dallas Cowboys coach Jimmy
Johnson several weeks ago, lost another possible candidate Thursday
when Notre Dame's Lou Holtz squelched a Florida newspaper story.
	``I spoke with Lou Holtz this afternoon, and he indicated to me
he's very happy in his role as head coach at Notre Dame,'' athletic
director Dick Rosenthal said. ``He fully intends to continue
coaching here for years to come.''
	The Florida Times-Union, citing unidentified team sources, said
Jaguars president David Seldin flew to White Plains, N.Y., on
Wednesday to meet with Holtz, who has been traveling for several
weeks.
	The Times-Union last week said the Jaguars met with Johnson in
Miami, but Jaguars owner Wayne Weaver denied a meeting took place.
	``We've had absolutely no contact with Jimmy Johnson --
personally, by phone or by contacts,'' Weaver said. ``There is no
validity to any of it.''
	Dallas owner Jerry Jones said the Jaguars could be severely
penalized if they try to hire Johnson, who led Dallas to two
straight Super Bowl championships and has five years left on his
contract.
	After the Cowboys' Super Bowl victory over Buffalo, Johnson said
he was asked by reporters about taking the Jacksonville job, ``and
what I said instead of the standard line was that anytime you have
a job, you're willing to listen to other opportunities.''
	Despite the rumors, he said, ``I don't have any thoughts right
now that I'll be anywhere else.''
	Meanwhile, former Washington Redskins coach Joe Gibbs told the
Times-Union he would like to meet with the Jaguars when his
contract status is made clear. He left the Redskins in 1992 but his
contract expires next February.
	``As soon as the league gets this contract worked out, then I'd
like to talk,'' said Gibbs, a NASCAR owner, who was at the Daytona
International Speedway on Wednesday.
	Gibbs has expressed interest in both the Jaguars and the
Carolina Panthers. Both teams have sought clarification on Gibbs'
availability.
	Holtz's son, Skip, a former Irish assistant who was named head
coach at the University of Connecticut in December, said he had not
seen his father in about two weeks and had heard nothing about the
Jacksonville rumor.
	``I wish I knew something about it,'' the younger Holtz said.
``I was doing a speech this morning and came into my office and had
six messages from the media.''
	Holtz, who coached the New York Jets in 1976, came to Notre Dame
from the University of Minnesota a decade later but was said to be
returning to the NFL in 1991 when Jerry Burns left the Vikings.
Holtz then signed a five-year contract that squelched those rumors
and said unequivocally that he intended to remain at Notre Dame as
long as the school wanted him.
	His contract with the Irish runs through the 1995 season.
	``I love Notre Dame,'' Holtz said in 1991. ``I want to finish
out my coaching career here, whether that's a year or two years or
five years. I don't plan on coaching anyplace else -- and you can
put that sucker in granite.''
9.1629PTOVAX::JACOBI lift, you grab. ...Tue Mar 01 1994 19:4712
    Ha Ha Ha...Just heard a report that Bubby Brister is shooting off his
    mouth, in New Orleans this time.  Says money is not the issue and will
    work for $500k less than the average of what starting QB's get
    nowadays, as long as he starts in NO.  Says he can outthrow all three
    of the present N.O. qb's, Wade Wilson, Steve Walsh, and Mike Buck. 
    Maybe he cain outthrow them, but he cain't outthink them, the guy has a
    pea fer a brain.  
    
    Brister, a Starting Qb, hell, he ain't nothing but a backup qb at best.
    
    JaKe
    
9.1630GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Fri Mar 04 1994 12:269
    The Philadelphia Eagles are reportedly being sold by Norman Braman. The
    buyer is reported to be Jeffrey Lurie (sp), who is a movie producer.
    The price is reported to be $196 million.
    
    Unless the new owner cleans house in the front office, it won't really
    matter who owns the team, esp. with the salary cap in place.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.1631LAGUNA::MAY_BRBuffalo's new area code = 044Fri Mar 04 1994 14:067
    
    It might help some just to sell the team, Dennis.  Braman has such a
    bad rep around the league (must be some sort of Philly pwners thing), 
    that in this new FA era, players seem to just want out of the Eagles. 
    A new owner might change things around.
    
    brews  
9.1632FRETZ::HEISERthe rock cries out!Fri Mar 04 1994 15:112
    With Barkley and Buddy here, and now others soon to follow, lots of
    Philly fans are now Phoenix fans.
9.1634FRETZ::HEISERthe rock cries out!Fri Mar 04 1994 15:405
    >     Says who? Eagles fans are Eagles fans and Sixers fans are Sixers
    
    Says all the majority of the Philadelphia media, that's who.  Not to
    mention all the Philly transplants out here that are coming out of the
    woodwork to change allegiances.
9.1635METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Mar 04 1994 15:573
MikeH finally has company??? :-)

The Crazy Met
9.1636that's richFRETZ::HEISERthe rock cries out!Fri Mar 04 1994 16:032
    Yeah look who's talking about company.  The one that had to feed his
    dog filet mignon so it would play with him.
9.1637METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Mar 04 1994 16:054
I'm with REK when it comes to dogs; don't like 'em. Never had any pets.
Try again Mikey.

The Crazy Met
9.1638what a sad boyFRETZ::HEISERthe rock cries out!Fri Mar 04 1994 16:071
    see, they couldn't even pay the dogs to play with you.
9.1639GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Fri Mar 04 1994 16:3110
    Well, I'm a Philadelphia fan who is also a fan of Barkley and Ryan. I
    don't know that I can pull for Phoenix when they play Philadelphia, but
    I'll be cherring for them on the other games. 
    
    While neither Ryan or Barkley won a championship in Philadelphia, they
    made the games fun and interesting and , IMO as a fan, that's all you
    can ask for. Both teams have become pretty boring since they left.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.1640MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Sat Mar 05 1994 23:115
    weak Mike, real weak. See MikeH, to really insult it usually helps to
    have a little wit and originality to it. You fail on all counts.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1641nice comeback you have there, TCMFRETZ::HEISERthe rock cries out!Mon Mar 07 1994 15:251
    
9.1642MacMahon's been traded!!!TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHWhitewater&lt;&lt;&lt;Contra (Bush knew)Tue Mar 15 1994 12:414
Seriously, the Vikes cut the stiff yesterday.  Something about being overpaid,
overrated and failing to deliver.

=Bob=
9.1643Buddy trying to save money to get the defensive studsFRETZ::HEISERimpeach the President and her husbandTue Mar 15 1994 14:161
    Rumor has it that Buddy may sign him.
9.1644QUASER::JACKSONTALong lost recipeTue Mar 15 1994 21:494
    ]  JimmyMac is a backup.  I wonder what Salisbury is doing.  Didn't he
    want starting QB wages?  He's also a good backup.
    
      Tim
9.16452 Point conversion may be coming to the NFLPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Mar 18 1994 15:0860
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Wed, 16 Mar 94:

--------
Subject: NFL Ready To Adopt 2-Point PAT
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 94 19:00:10 PST
 
	NEW YORK (AP) -- Thirty-six years after it became a fixture in
college football, the NFL seems ready to adopt the two-point
conversion.
	Joe Browne, the NFL's vice-president for communications, said
Wednesday the league's rule-making competition committee will urge
the owners to adopt the two-point rule at their meetings next week
in Orlando.
	``If I were going to give you an overall theme of the
meetings,'' Browne said during a conference call, ``it would be to
re-emphasize touchdowns and de-emphasize field goals.''
	Last year, 24 percent of the NFL's points came on field goals,
the most in league history. There also were three field goals for
every four touchdowns compared to a 1-2 ratio a decade ago.
	Colleges adopted the two-point conversion in 1958 and it was
used in the old American Football League before it merged with the
NFL. It also was used in the United States Football League.
	But the NFL has always resisted the change for several reasons --
in part because it has overtime; in part because it was a rule in
rival leagues, and in large measure because coaches didn't want to
be faced with additional decisions.
	The attitude among coaches, however, has changed, and Browne
said that the change is backed strongly by such former college
coaches as Dennis Green of Minnesota, Jimmy Johnson of Dallas and
Bobby Ross of San Diego.
	``I didn't like the idea at first,'' says Miami's Don Shula,
co-chairman of the competition committee.
	``But the more I looked at it, the more I realized how it could
help our league. I think it's a way not only to bring excitement to
the game, it's also a way to maker scoring touchdowns a premium. It
can make things look very differently to a team that gets down
early in a game.''
	The NFL proposal, which must be approved by 21 of the 28 active
teams, will put the ball at the 2-yard-line rather than the
3-yard-line, where it is placed in college. Browne said the 2-yard
line is preferred because that's where the ball is put for kicks
and it will encourage use of the new play.
	If approved, the new rule would take effect this season.
	Unlike colleges, however, the defensive team will not be able to
score on a botched conversion attempt. Under a rule adopted by the
colleges in 1988, the defense can get two points by returning an
interception or a fumble for a score.
	In addition to the two-point rule, the competition committee
will try to get more kickoff returns into the game by recommending
that kickoffs be moved back to the 30-yard line from the 35. Last
year, only 68.5 percent of kickoffs were returned compared to 87
percent in 1978.
	The last time the kickoff line was moved was in 1974, when it
went to the 35 from the 40. That season, returns were up from 74.4
percent to 92.1 percent.
	``It's a credit to the kickers,'' Browne said. ``But the biggest
problem we wanted to address was getting more touchdowns into the
game.''

9.1646Realignment on the horizon?PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Mar 18 1994 15:1332
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Thu, 17 Mar 94:

--------
Subject: Rooney Seeks NFL Realignment
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 94 12:20:26 PST
 
	PITTSBURGH (AP) -- Pittsburgh Steelers president Dan Rooney said
he'll lobby for broad realignment at the NFL owners meetings this
weekend in Orlando, Fla.
	With expansion adding two teams, it's now or never, said Rooney,
who is pessimistic about his chances.
	``I think realignment would do so much for the league from an
interest standpoint,'' Rooney said. ``And I think it's going to be
a missed opportunity.''
	The NFL will expand to 30 teams in 1995, when the Carolina
Panthers and Jacksonville Jaguars begin play.
	Rooney wants to preserve rivalries like the 49ers-Rams and
Steelers-Browns, but he wants to see new ones like Dallas-Houston
and Miami-Tampa Bay.
	Pittsburgh could join Buffalo, Indianapolis or Charlotte in a
regional central division, Rooney said.
	The Steelers have competed in the AFC Central since the NFL-AFL
merger in 1970 and have played in the same division with Cleveland
since 1950.
	Rooney needs a two-thirds majority of 21 teams to pass any
realignment plan. It takes only eight teams to kill any plan.
	Joe Browne, NFL vice president of communication and development,
said there are seven realignment plans under consideration. Most
plans divide the league evenly into six divisions of five teams
each.

9.1647HANNAH::ASHElike sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his livesTue Mar 22 1994 19:192
    The NFL approved the 2 point conversion for their league.
    
9.1648SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dTue Mar 22 1994 20:221
    from the 2 or the 3?
9.1649CSC32::M_MACGREGORWed Mar 23 1994 11:264
    
    Pretty sureit isfrom the 2.  They also moved kickoffs to the 30.
    
    Marc
9.1650Push 'em backSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOWed Mar 23 1994 11:528
Missed field goal spots too.

	If a team misses the field goal, the defending team gets the ball
at the spot of the kick, not the line of scrimmage.

	This will probably cut down on 50+ yard field goal attempts....

	Zamboni
9.1651FRETZ::HEISERMr.Clinton, Linda Thompson is rightWed Mar 23 1994 14:072
    If you grab a turnover during a PAT or 2-pt attempt and score at the
    other end zone, do you get the PAT value or 6 points?
9.1652HANNAH::ASHElike sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his livesWed Mar 23 1994 14:091
    Where does a PAT get lined up?  Can you fake the PAT and go for 2?
9.1653now he has to get a real field goal kickerCNTROL::CHILDSDean's gone fishin'Wed Mar 23 1994 14:4610
you can't score defensively on PAT atleast that's what they were saying
last week. I don't think they changed their minds yesterday.

biggest crybaby over the new rules: Dan Reeves..........

 why am I not surprised?????


 mike
9.1654PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 23 1994 14:494
9.1655SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dWed Mar 23 1994 21:278
 >     <<< Note 9.1653 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Dean's gone fishin'" >>>               
 >   -< now he has to get a real field goal kicker >-
    
    With the salary cap, I'm gonna bet htat there will be a bunch of decent
    FG kickers around.  With the kickiffs moved back to the 30, Treadwell
    SHOULD be gone.
    
    brews
9.1656FRETZ::HEISERMember:RoyalCanadianKiltedYaksmenThu Mar 24 1994 15:024
    Re: salary cap
    
    wait until all the final cuts are made.  Should be some good talent on
    the waiver wire this season.
9.1657George to the FalconsMPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Thu Mar 24 1994 16:135
    The Colts traded Jeff George to the Falcons for a 1st and a 3rd round
    draft pick in this year's draft and 2nd round in 96 - which could be
    upgraded to a 1st based on performance.
    
    Mike
9.1658Wilkinson would have been nice, but Pats had to go and win ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Mar 24 1994 16:5516
>    The Colts traded Jeff George to the Falcons for a 1st and a 3rd round
>    draft pick in this year's draft and 2nd round in 96 - which could be
>    upgraded to a 1st based on performance.
    
    Nobody's come out and reported any of the NE braintrust's thoughts on it, 
    but I'm starting to see the scenario where my man Field Marshall Faulk 
    comes to the Patriots, whether he was their first priority or not-- it 
    looks like Wilkinson to Cincinnati, Shuler/Dilfer to Indianapolis, 
    Dilfer/Shuler to Washington, and then Faulk looks like at least the
    biggest name from the remaining proverbial "best available athletes"
    (then again, Wheatley's up there too, I guess).  Anyone heard anything
    else; any other possibilities?
    
    glenn
      
9.1660HANNAH::ASHElike sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his livesThu Mar 24 1994 17:072
    You mean Antonio Langham?  DB - 'bama?
    
9.1662wheatly?BSS::MENDEZThu Mar 24 1994 17:474
    I thought that Wheatly from Michigan was going to continue in college?
    
    Frank
    
9.1663HANNAH::ASHElike sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his livesFri Mar 25 1994 12:242
    Yup, he stayed in school..
    
9.1664Of course nobody will touch Hebert at his price...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHWhitewater&lt;&lt;&lt;Contra (Bush knew)Fri Mar 25 1994 13:0214
OK, another trade that looks stoopid to me...

The Falcons gave three draft choices - #1(!) and #3 this year, and #2 nexted
year, for that chicken-butt stiff Jeff George.  The GM was quoted as saying
that George could "take them to the next level".  The talk was that tihs move 
allows them to dump Bobby Hebert's salary, as well as escaping paying two
draft choices thised year.  

It seems to me that a) George will take them nowhere, is a stiff, and certainly
no improvement over Hebert, b) draft choices are how you build your club,
and that they should dump veterans instead, and c) they were totally rooked in
the deal.

=Bob=
9.1665MKFSA::LONGThat's my story and I'm stickin' to it!Fri Mar 25 1994 13:045
	=Bob=, does that mean you won't vote for Jeff George for the HOF?
	Just want to be clear...


	billl
9.1666CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Fri Mar 25 1994 16:094
>	=Bob=, does that mean you won't vote for Jeff George for the HOF?
>	Just want to be clear...

Well I like him beter than Pat Riley...
9.1667ANd to make a bad trade worse ...TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Fri Mar 25 1994 16:323
    If the Falcons win seven games nexted season, the #2 pick becomes a #1!
    
    NAZZ
9.1668PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Mar 28 1994 18:534
  The Atlanta/Jeff George trade sounds almost as stupid as the 
  Minnesota/Herchel Walker trade. Indy come out the big winner.

	Keith
9.1669just reported...USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Mar 29 1994 18:551
Jimmy Johnson just resigned.
9.1670Realignment scenariosPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 29 1994 19:0073
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (AP)
Subject: NFL Weighs Realignment Ideas
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 15:40:25 PST

	ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) -- The NFL unveiled four possible scenarios
for realignment Wednesday, with traditional have-not teams doing
most of the shifting.
	The four plans are designed to absorb the expansion Carolina
Panthers and Jacksonville Jaguars beginning in 1995. If the owners
can't agree on what to do, commissioner Paul Tagliabue has the
authority to insert Carolina and Jacksonville into the two
divisions that now have four teams each.
	``These are just a few of the ideas we've had,'' said Wellington
Mara, co-chairman of the expansion committee. ``There probably are
as many ideas as there are teams.''
	Most of the proposals shift teams that are traditionally toward
the bottom of the standings or less attractive on television while
leaving the more attractive and successful teams where they are.
	For example, all four plans keep Dallas with the New York
Giants, Washington and Philadelphia in the NFC East but ship out
the newly renamed Arizona Cardinals in three of them. Indianapolis
and Tampa Bay are moved elsewhere in all four.
	Of the ``have'' teams, only Minnesota and Houston are moved in
more than one.
	The owners also:
	--approved for at least two years the sale of the Miami Dolphins
to Wayne Huizenga, contingent on a change in the league's policy of
prohibiting ownership of teams in more than one sport. Huizenga,
who also owns baseball's Florida Marlins and hockey's Florida
Panthers, will have full authority to run the team, although it
technically will be held in trust until June 1, 1996.
	--approved use of a radio that would allow coaches to send plays
to quarterbacks. It cuts off with 15 seconds left on the game clock
and will be used at least for this season on an experimental basis.
	--watched as one of their number, Dallas' Jerry Jones, emphasized
that Jimmy Johnson was still his coach despite their latest rift --
the result of an early-morning barroom conversation in which Jones
suggested he might replace the coach of his two-time Super Bowl
champions with former Oklahoma coach Barry Switzer.
	Of most interest for the long-term were the realignment
proposals.
	The first is the least radical.
	It leaves the NFC East and AFC West intact; inserts Jacksonville
into the NFC West and Carolina into the AFC Central, and switches
only two existing teams -- Indianapolis from the AFC East to the NFC
Central and Tampa Bay the other way, from the NFC Central to the
AFC East.
	The second puts Carolina in the NFC Central and Jacksonville in
the AFC East; transfers Arizona to the AFC West, replacing the
Cardinals in the East with Tampa Bay and moves Indianapolis to the
AFC Central.
	The third concept moves eight teams and the fourth concept nine.
	In the third, Jacksonville is placed in the AFC East and
Carolina in the NFC Central.
	But the NFC West is radically altered, retaining only the Los
Angeles Rams and San Francisco and adding the Cardinals, Vikings
and Seattle Seahawks. Atlanta and New Orleans, currently in the NFC
West, end up in the AFC Central, Houston is shifted to the AFC West
and Tampa Bay replaces Arizona in the NFC East.
	The fourth is a variation of that with New Orleans in the NFC
Central; Atlanta in the AFC East, and Buffalo and Indianapolis in
the AFC Central. Minnesota, Arizona and Seattle are again in the
NFC West; Tampa Bay in the NFC East, and Houston in the AFC West.
	Along with that, the NFL is exploring a scheduling change that
would allow regular rivalries to be played annually or every two
years.
	That would include games between Jets-Giants, Rams-Raiders,
Pittsburgh-Philadelphia, Dallas-Houston, Miami-Tampa Bay and the
two expansion teams across conference lines. It might also include
intra-conference rivalries like Buffalo-Pittsburgh.


    
9.1671OLD1S::SYSTEMWed Mar 30 1994 14:2814
	The Cowboys can kiss their  three-peat chance good bye. What could have
been another dynasty will disintegrate within the next year. The new coach will
have to rebuild with cheaper players much the same way Johnson started out five
years ago. Johnson may be leaving because he does not wish to have to go through
the same challenge again. What does he have to prove? 

IMOH the new salary cap is going to see many of the older veterans cut and
replaced by the cheaper young guys. The biggest impact will be in lineman. 
QB's and nack will still continue to get all the money. 



 Cadzilla2
9.1672METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Mar 30 1994 14:386
re: .1671

sweet words; I hope you are right.

The Crazy Met

9.1673CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Thu Mar 31 1994 13:143
    The Colts sign (or are going to soon sign) Jimmah Harbough...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.1674QUASER::JACKSONTALong lost recipeFri Apr 01 1994 00:503
    re-1
    
      The colts won't go far again
9.1675MKFSA::LONGThat's my story and I'm stickin' to it!Fri Apr 01 1994 12:437
>>QUASER::JACKSONTA "Long lost recipe"
		     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	I did not!  Hail, I'd be the laughin' stock of Walton's Mountain
	if'n I did that.


	billl
9.1676ELMAGO::BENBACAA thing is a terrible mind to waste!Fri Apr 01 1994 14:029
    re 9.1671
    
    Last time I checked they were still undefeated :-)
    
    Last time I checked they were still the SB Champs.
    
    They haven't lost any player of great signifance as of yet.
    
    Doom and Gloom is a bit premature.
9.1677Norton will leaveFRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantFri Apr 01 1994 14:072
    If you were a bigtime FA on Dallas now, what would motivate you to
    stay?
9.1678ELMAGO::BENBACAA thing is a terrible mind to waste!Fri Apr 01 1994 14:157
     Norton was more a team player than an individual great. He will be
    missed but it won't be as bad a folks think without him. 
    
    Robert Jones played middle the year before and the defense was actually
    better than this past year(statistically).
    
    Let him go
9.1679DYPSS1::ROPERTake a Sad Song and Make it BetterFri Apr 01 1994 14:1814
    >> If you were a bigtime FA on Dallas now, what would motivate you to
    >> stay?
    
    Are you serious Mike?  How 'bout the ability to continue playing on the
    BEST team in the NFL.  Ain't even close.  Barry Switzer is a proven 
    winner and motivator.  Aikman was quoted as saying Switzer was the best
    motivational coach that he'd ever played for!  Outside of financial 
    aspects, most players want to have the chance to play on a championship 
    caliber team.  
    
    Dallas thus far has lost nobody that would impact their chances of a
    3-peat next season.  Time will tell.
    
    - Rope
9.1680ELMAGO::BENBACAA thing is a terrible mind to waste!Fri Apr 01 1994 14:236
     Berry recruited Aikman and must have been a pretty good coach because
    Aikman has nothing but good things to say about Berry.
    
    Unfortunatly Aikman got hurt and when Aikman saw that he would not fit
    in the scheme of things at Oklahoma it was Berry who help himin seeking
    and transfering to UCLA.
9.1681ELMAGO::BENBACAA thing is a terrible mind to waste!Fri Apr 01 1994 14:252
    Actually the only player they have lost that has some signifance is Ed
    Murry. He did a great job this past season and he will be missed.
9.1682FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantFri Apr 01 1994 14:355
>    BEST team in the NFL.  Ain't even close.  Barry Switzer is a proven 
>    winner and motivator.  Aikman was quoted as saying Switzer was the best
    
    Barry's accomplishments don't count because he's a cheater running a
    dirty program and the NCAA didn't have a salary cap.
9.1683ELMAGO::BENBACAA thing is a terrible mind to waste!Fri Apr 01 1994 20:313
     How did he cheat? The players still play the game. Not the coach.
    
     
9.1684HANNAH::ASHElike sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his livesFri Apr 01 1994 21:442
    GO WISHBONE!!!
    
9.1685Walton's Mountain? Push him off (-)QUASER::JACKSONTALong lost recipeSat Apr 02 1994 16:466
    re .1675
    
      That's part of a line from Van Halen's Poundcake tune off of the
    Unlawful Carnal knowledge CD.
    
      Tim
9.1686Moon to the Vikes? What does Doc have to say?PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Apr 07 1994 15:4131
    clarinews@clarinet.com articles by Tue, 5 Apr 94:

--------
Subject: Report: Moon May Be Dealt
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 94 6:50:11 PDT
 
	HOUSTON (AP) -- Cody Carlson could get a restructured contract
with the Houston Oilers as early as Tuesday, paving the way for
Warren Moon to be dealt to the Minnesota Vikings, sources told the
Houston Chronicle.
	The Oilers and Vikings have been talking for some time, and deal
reportedly is in the works for Houston to get a fourth-round draft
choice this year and a third-round pick in 1995 for Moon, the
Chronicle reported in Tuesday's editions.
	A deal to unload a quarterback seems inevitable because Houston
will have trouble fitting both quarterbacks' salaries under the
$34.2 million cap. Each has a contract for at least $3 million for
1994.
	Carlson is under a two-year, $8.85 million deal he signed last
year. The team is trying to restructure it by shaving about $1
million from his 1994 salary and adding a year.
	Carlson's agent, Vic Vines, resumed negotiations Monday for a
three-year deal with general manager Floyd Reese and general
counsel Steve Underwood. Carlson is vacationing in Africa.
	``We made progress, but the deal wasn't finalized,'' Vines said.
``We're hoping to resolve this matter within the next couple of
days.''
	Moon is to make $3.25 million this year and $3 million next
year.

9.1687Looks like arough season nexted year for the PackTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu Apr 07 1994 17:321
Moon will be HUGE improvement over Jim "da Stiff" McMahon...
9.1688FRETZ::HEISERClinton Impeachment: 14.2M+ signaturesThu Apr 07 1994 18:151
    McMahon said he wants to finish his career in Phoenix.
9.1689METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Apr 07 1994 18:184
joy in mudville.

The Crazy Met

9.1690raisinHBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaThu Apr 07 1994 18:195
>    McMahon said he wants to finish his career in Phoenix.

I thought it was Arizona now.

TTom
9.1691MrT Geography 101FRETZ::HEISERClinton Impeachment: 14.2M+ signaturesThu Apr 07 1994 18:271
    Phoenix is in Arizona.
9.1692NFL 101HBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaThu Apr 07 1994 18:281
So he wants to live in Phoenix? Play for Arizona?
9.1693TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu Apr 07 1994 18:293
re: McMahon

He was finished after the 1985 Super Bowl, it's just that nobody told him.
9.1694CAMONE::WAYThe Old Man and the PCThu Apr 07 1994 18:3010
Jim McMahon is dried up, like a raisin in the sun......


'Saw


PS  If you're "local", and you can tell me the correct answer as to where
    the line "raisin in the sun" comes from, I'll buy you a beer sometime
    at a get together.....
    
9.1695SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dMon Apr 11 1994 18:1617
    >PS  If you're "local", and you can tell me the correct answer as to
    >where    the line "raisin in the sun" comes from, I'll buy you a beer
    >sometime 
    
    That's easy 'saw.   It's from that smarmy pop song of the '70's.  It
    goes like this:
    
    We had joy, we had fun,
    We had raisins in the sun.
    
    One of my favorites, right after Honey.
    
    
    I remain (sorry Kev), working on how to get local, so's I can have that
    beer.
    
    brews
9.1696CAMONE::WAYSmells like dead teen spiritMon Apr 11 1994 18:214
Nah, it came from a poem by Langston Hughes, about Harlem.


'Saw
9.1697SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dMon Apr 11 1994 18:245
    
    Hughes stole it from that song, 'saw.  Don't you remember that big
    legal battle?
    
    brews
9.1698CAMONE::WAYSmells like dead teen spiritMon Apr 11 1994 18:305
>    
>    Hughes stole it from that song, 'saw.  Don't you remember that big
>    legal battle?
    
Oh, I thought that was The Rascals that had that problem.....8^)
9.1699METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Apr 11 1994 20:168
anyways it was

 seasons in the sun

but what do those desert dwellers know anyway! :-)

The Crazy Met

9.1700SNARF - Brews' heroFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixMon Apr 11 1994 20:351
    "Seasons in the Sun" - Terry Jack
9.1701HANNAH::ASHEBurn the Tiger road pajamas!Mon Apr 11 1994 20:522
    That's Terry Jacks...
    
9.1702SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dTue Apr 12 1994 16:437
    >anyways it was 
    >seasons in the sun
    >but what do those desert dwellers know anyway! :-)
    
    >The Crazy Met
    
    Gee, TC*, you are sew smart.
9.1703HANNAH::ASHEWhaddya want for nuttin'?Wed Apr 13 1994 15:2154
Answer to Mac's question about Doc and Moon and the Vikes...
    
Well, like I told ya, Moon was a Vike ... thoughts :

1. I figured Moon was gone after the Chiefs' loss. Despite the fact that that 
was one of the worst displays of pass protection in NFL history (Theismann 
summed it up by saying "Offensive Line Incompentence"), when I was in Houston 
in Feburary, the press savaged Moon. And I'm sorry to say, call-in shows were 
divided along some obvious lines (not offensive/defensive either). The skids 
have been greased for a while.

2. I didn't think even Bud Adams would be as stupid to trade Moon within the 
AFC. That left Washington, Phoenix, Minnesota, and Atlanta in the NFC. I don't 
think that Detroit or LA was even really in the running. I heard LA made a 
MAJOR run at Moon (who is from LA), but they are IMO, at least three years away 
(when Moon is 40). The Lions have more holes than they think, and I believe 
that the coaching was a much larger headache than the QB situation. If nothing 
else changes, I pity Scott Mitchell. (He ain't 'The Answer', IMO. And the fans 
will eat him alive.) Buddy Ryan in Phoenix ended that idea, and Washington is 
seriously rebuliding. That leaves Atlanta (my fav), and Minnesota. Of course, 
Atlanta traded for Boy George ....

3. Originally, the asking price was two number 2 picks (one conditional).That 
got lowered, as this utterly screwed up free agency system has made it a 
buyer's market for GM's. (Aside - Gene Upshaw, one of my all-time favorite 
players, has got to be Dunce Of The Decade. Hands down. Micheal Irvin should 
become his successor, and fast.)

4. If the deal goes through, it's hard to say who will win. Moon *definitely* 
upgrades the QB position for Minnesota (McMahon had to be the most overrated QB 
in recent memory), and they have a good coach in Green, deep at RB (*if* Robert 
Smith and Terry Allen return to pre-injury form), and they signed Chris Hinton. 
But Chris Doleman may be as good as gone, and the Vikes need a top-shelf WR as 
bad as the Pats do (AC is fried - stick a fork in him). But Moon is the best QB 
the Vikes have had since Tarkenton (hero of my youth :-), and the healthiest. 
Plus this is the NFC Central, so even with stronger clubs in Chicago and Green 
Bay, that can only help.

On the other hand, I think the Oilers are in deep kaka. Carlson is a good QB. 
Moon was a great QB, and it may show as soon as next year. Morale is not good, 
and the team will almost certainly lose Sean Jones, along with William Fuller. 
Throw in possible defections by Haywood Jeffries, Greg Montgomery, Al Smith, 
and a few others, and we are talking about a *volaitle* mix. Plus the team is 
switching to a multiple offense (some R&S, but a little Buffalo 1-back, and 
conventional 2-back sets) - more adjustments. And then the Oilers are losing 
team leaders in Moon and Jones. The Oilers are a team that can go 11-5 next 
year, or 8-8 just as easily. 

But I guess it's funny how things run in circles. The Vikes were my first team 
until the Les(s) Steckel Reign of Err. I might have to check on purple number 1 
jerseys after all.

Doc  
                                               
9.1704FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixWed Apr 13 1994 16:131
    I noticed Doc said Atlanta is his fave now.  Is he living there?
9.1705"Rap Rap Rap they call him the Rapper"CNTROL::CHILDSBrillant, Charming and NastyWed Apr 13 1994 16:2214
>>    I noticed Doc said Atlanta is his fave now.  Is he living there?

	I think Doctor manymanyzeros was refering to Hot'Lanta as his
  fave place for Moon to go. I could be wrong and I'm sure that those
  wicked black jerseys have nothing to do with Doc's choice....

 ;^)

 one thing Walt ask him for me please whose better Mourning or "Do you
 want see me Pass? NO! Do you want see me shoot? No! Do you want to see
 me Dunk it? Yes!"

 mike
9.1706HANNAH::ASHEWhaddya want for nuttin'?Wed Apr 13 1994 16:285
    Yeah, he meant for where Moon should have wound up.  But he may change
    affiliations to the Vikes now.  Although, he did switch 2 years ago on
    the X-Men from #1 to #21 (Deion)...  He's working up here still.  He'll be
    at the get together Friday and the game Monday...
    
9.1707HANNAH::ASHEWhaddya want for nuttin'?Wed Apr 13 1994 17:3738
     Don't get Doc started.... from him....
    
    Yeah, I would have rather seen Moon in Atlanta - the offense is more
    compatible, speed receivers, and plenty of talent on both sides of the
    ball.
    
    And yes, they have the best jerseys in the NFL. I'm not sure Minnesota
    is a Super Bowl contender even with Moon, unless/until they sign and keep
    Doleman, and pick up a quality deep threat.
    
    Shaq v. Zo
    
    What cracks me up is all of the people taking the pro-Zo side who hated
    his guts at Georgetown. (too dirty, too mean, attitude, etc ...) Why don't
    they find a bandwagon and stay on it ?
    
    I think both guys are a couple of years away - 'Zo needs to stay healthy, 
    and the Hornets may need a better coach. Shaq needs to expand his shot 
    selection, and the Magic need to find him some help at PF.
    
    In any case, this is too beautiful - the Celtic Jihad Faithful, with no
    one to root for in green, have sunken to proxy masterbation (or is it 
    massa-bation) of the Russell era. I LOVE IT !
    
    BTW, Hakeem is near-deity anyhow, Shaq, Zo and the other guys will have
    to wait their turn.
    
    Doc
    
    p.s. Did you hear how somebody on Imus said that Ewing got b-slapped by
    Shaq ? Roolwaard.
    
    p.p.s. Wilt > Russell. Just remember who was the doorman in the
    original Reebok
    commericial while Wilt was sipping his morning coffee .... (admittedly it
    should have been Walton doing the toilets ...)
    
                                           
9.1708METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Apr 13 1994 17:457
> Why don't they find a bandwagon and stay on it ?
    
coming from Doc, that line is areal hoot.

The Crazy Met

9.1709CAMONE::WAYSmells like dead teen spiritWed Apr 13 1994 17:471
Russell > Wilt....
9.1710METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Apr 13 1994 17:548
so what does Russell and Wilt have to do with the NFL??


For MtM :-)

The Crazy Met

9.1711CNTROL::CHILDSBrillant, Charming and NastyWed Apr 13 1994 18:3310
 You got love that Doc he can still "reach out and taunt someone"....

 For the record please remind him that I was Zo's biggest fan while at
 Georgetown and now. It was me who first drew the Zo > Shaq comparision
 to the Russell > Wilted at which everyone laughed but Hawk......

 thanks Walt....good to see the Doc hasn't changed.....

 mike
9.1712METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Apr 13 1994 18:344
yabbut, all Hawk wanted to do was party.

The Crazy Met

9.1713HANNAH::ASHEWhaddya want for nuttin'?Wed Apr 13 1994 18:352
    For Doc... it started talking about Moon and the Falcon jerseys...
    
9.1714Vikes need MoonANGLIN::WIERSBECKGolden Gopher hoops!Wed Apr 13 1994 20:157
    Hey Walt,
    
    Ask Doc what Cris Carter is, if he isn't a top notch WR.  After CC,
    they could use some help.
    
    
    Spud
9.1715HANNAH::ASHEWhaddya want for nuttin'?Thu Apr 14 1994 13:3742
 From Doc: The Vikes fan who doesn't know how to spell Cris Carter's name.
    
    
Ask Bob Hunt. Chris is tremendous inside the 20. And a hell of a leaper. But he 
is so-so over the middle, and had a brutal game vs the Jints in the wild-card 
game. And has only good speed. In this league, you need a burner. I mean a guy 
who can flat out haul ass, because NOTHING can screw up a sophisticated 
coverage like sheer speed. You have to respect it and/or get some speed to 
cover speed. (There is a reason why I didn't mention free agent Haywood 
Jeffries, although CC can fill that role.)

The Vikes need at least one, and probably two real threats on the outside - and 
I have a question : How much does Steve Jordan have left ?

Question 2 : Will Robert Smith get moved to WR ? There was talk of that last 
year ....

Aside : There is a possible (and tenuous) analogy to Montana going to KC. 
Big-time QB to new team, with a supporting cast that isn't as good as the 
former team. However, 1) Moon is a lot healthier, but 2) KC fixed their offense 
to accomodate Joe (unpreceedented as far as I know), Moon may not get that 
luxury, IMO - although the story goes that Green would much rather use a 
controlled passing game al la SF/Wash, rather than the attack of the past few 
years. Hence the reason for the firing of OC Jack Burns last year. Trouble was, 
it was only then that Green realized that McMahon was more of the problem than 
the offense (notice that Sailsbury threw for more yardage per game (+50 yds) 
than McMahon).

In any case, next season will be an odd one. I wonder if the Player's 
Association Contract will be voided by 1996 ? 

Idea : Say I am a member of the NFLPA. I'm in line for a salary increase from 
say $400,000 to $1,200,000 as a transistion player or such. But the cap gets me 
cut, and I am forced to sign a 1 year deal at $650,000. Okay then, I stop 
paying my dues, and resign from the NFLPA. I get 20 of my teammates to do so as 
well. Now since I'm not a member, I am not bound by the agreement, hence my 
salary doesn't affect the cap. Suspend me for not being a member, and you lose 
half of the team, including at least 5-6 starters. Say I am the Cowboys, Bills, 
Niners, or Oilers. Ouch.

What do you think ? Do I ultimately get my 1.2 M ???
9.1716Cris CarterANGLIN::WIERSBECKGolden Gopher hoops!Thu Apr 14 1994 16:0728
    Hey Walt, tell Doc to stuff it!  :*)
    
    Actually I think his name is spelled Cris.  There is a Cris out there
    somewhere, anyway.
    
    I dunno, most of the games I watched, he was always making a big play. 
    Part of the problem with the Giants game was the wind, Giants D and
    MacMahon.  I would have to disagree and I know a lot of Vikes fans seem
    to believe Cris is Pro Bowl caliber.
    
    Anyway, it's sounds like a done deal with Moon now, so I'd have to say
    for this year anyway, the Vikes have the best QB in the Central going
    into the season.  (aFvre :*) is getting there, but still makes too many
    mistakes.  With a healthy Terry Allan coming back, the offense
    might finally click like we've hoped it would consistantly.  Jordan
    should be around at least another year too.
    
    Smith is still rehabbing from his injury and probably won't be 100% to
    start the season.  I don't know of any plans to move him to WR right
    now.
    
    Tell Doc to come back to the Vikes for unlike Herschel, this was a
    great move.  The Vikes have some additional early rounds picks in the
    draft too, so the future is looking good.
    
    
    Spud
    
9.1717CAMONE::WAYSmells like dead teen spiritThu Apr 14 1994 16:114
When the Vikings are in a big game, in a tight spot, Warren Moon will
choke just as badly as he did the past two seasons with the Oilers.

It's a given.....
9.1718HANNAH::ASHEWhaddya want for nuttin'?Thu Apr 14 1994 17:102
    Vikes-Bills Super Bowl?
    
9.1719but who would choke hardest?FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu Apr 14 1994 18:041
    
9.1720QUASER::JACKSONTALong lost recipeThu Apr 14 1994 20:052
    re-1
      Not Linda Lovlace (-)
9.1721METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Apr 14 1994 20:097
re: .1720

yo' man you gonna come on over and clean up the coffee that
is all over my screen??

The Crazy Met

9.1722Buddy's gonna kidnap ReggieFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu Apr 14 1994 20:152
    The Pack is out here holding a mini-camp and it's free and open to the
    public.  Sounds like we're gonna start a Cactus league for the NFL too.
9.1723First 2 rounds o' draftHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderMon Apr 25 1994 14:4891
Article: 18180
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (AP)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football.games,clari.sports.top
Subject: NFL Draft List - Rounds 1-2
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 94 21:10:07 PDT
 
	NEW YORK (AP) -- Selections Sunday in the 1994 NFL draft with
team, player, projected position and college (x-compensatory
selection):
First Round
	1, Cincinnati, Dan Wilkinson, dt, Ohio State.
	2, Indianapolis, Marshall Faulk, rb, San Diego State.
	3, Washington, Heath Shuler, qb, Tennessee.
	4, New England, Willie McGinest, de, Southern Cal.
	5, Indianapolis (from Los Angeles Rams), Trev Alberts, lb,
Nebraska.
	6, Tampa Bay, Trent Dilfer, qb, Fresno State.
	7, San Francisco (from Atlanta through Indianapolis and Los
Angeles Rams), Bryant Young, dt, Notre Dame.
	8, Seattle, Sam Adams, de, Texas A&M.
	9, Cleveland, Antonio Langham, db, Alabama.
	10, Arizona, Jamir Miller, lb, UCLA.
	11, Chicago, John Thierry, lb, Alcorn State.
	12, New York Jets (from New Orleans), Aaron Glenn, db, Texas
A&M.
	13, New Orleans (from New York Jets), Joe Johnson, de,
Louisville.
	14, Philadelphia, Bernard Williams, ot, Georgia.
	15, Los Angeles Rams (from San Diego through San Francisco),
Wayne Gandy, ot, Auburn.
	16, Green Bay (from Miami), Aaron Taylor, ot, Notre Dame.
	17, Pittsburgh, Charles Johnson, wr, Colorado.
	18, Minnesota (from Denver), DeWayne Washington, cb, North
Carolina State.
	19, Minnesota, Todd Steussie, ot, California.
	20, Miami (from Green Bay), Tim Bowens, dt, Mississippi.
	21, Detroit, Johnnie Morton, wr, Southern Cal.
	22, Los Angeles Raiders, Rob Fredrickson, lb, Michigan State.
	23, Dallas (from San Francisco), Shante Carver, de, Arizona
State.
	24, New York Giants, Thomas Lewis, wr, Indiana.
	25. Kansas City, Greg Hill, rb, Texas A&M.
	26, Houston, Henry Ford, de, Arkansas.
	27, Buffalo, Jeff Burris, db, Notre Dame.
	28, San Francisco (from Dallas), William Floyd, rb, Florida
State
	29, x-Cleveland (from Philadelphia), Derrick Alexander, wr,
Michigan
	
                           Second Round
	30, Cincinnati, Darnay Scott, wr, San Diego State.
	31, Washington, Tre Johnson, g, Temple.
	32, Indianapolis, Eric Mahlum, g, California.
	33, Los Angeles Rams, Isaac Bruce, wr, Memphis State.
	34, Tampa Bay, Errict Rhett, rb, Florida.
	35, New England, Kevin Lee, wr, Alabama.
	36, Seattle, Kevin Mawae, c, Louisiana State.
	37, Philadelphia (from Atlanta), Bruce Walker, dt, UCLA.
	38, Arizona, Chuck Levy, rb, Arizona.
	39, Chicago, Marcus Spears, ot, NW Louisiana.
	40, Minnesota (from Cleveland through Philadelphia and Atlanta),
David Palmer, wr, Alabama.
	41, New York Jets, Ryan Yarborough, wr, Wyoming.
	42, Philadelphia, Charlie Garner, rb, Tennessee.
	43, San Diego, Isaac Davis, g, Arkansas.
	44, New Orleans, Mario Bates, rb, Arizona State.
	45, x-Atlanta (from Minnesota), Bert Emanuel, wr, Rice.
	46, x-Dallas, Larry Allen, g, Sonoma State.
	47, x-New York Giants, Thomas Randolph, db, Kansas State.
	48, x-Buffalo, Bucky Brooks, wr, North Carolina.
	49, x-Los Angeles Rams, Toby Wright, db, Nebraska.
	50, Pittsburgh, Brentson Buckner, de, Clemson.
	51, Denver, Allen Aldridge, lb, Houston.
	52, Los Angeles Raiders (from Minnesota), James Folston, lb, NE
Louisiana.
	53, San Francisco (from Green Bay), Kevin Mitchell, lb,
Syracuse.
	54, Miami, Aubrey Beavers, lb, Oklahoma.
	55, Los Angeles Raiders, Fernando Smith, de, Jackson State.
	56, Los Angeles Rams (from San Francisco), Brad Ottis, dt, Wayne
State, Neb.
	57, Detroit, Van Malone, db, Texas.
	58, Kansas City, Donnell Bennett, rb, Miami.
	59, New York Giants, Jason Sehorn, db, Southern Cal.
	60, Houston, Jeremy Nunley, de, Alabama.
	61, Buffalo, Lonnie Johnson, te, Florida State.
	62, San Francisco (from Dallas), Tyronne Drakeford, db, Virginia
Tech.
	63, x-San Diego, Vaughn Parker, g, UCLA.
	64, x-Buffalo, Sam Rogers, lb, Colorado.
	65, x-Miami (from Arizona), Tim Ruddy, c, Notre Dame.
9.1724CAMONE::WAYSnake and NapeMon Apr 25 1994 15:124
       <<< Note 9.1723 by HBAHBA::HAAS "Maybe too much Goody's Powder" >>>
                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Been listening to King Richard advertise it too much, eh?
9.1725do you like good music?HBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderMon Apr 25 1994 15:257
Run C&W:
	Spotlight on Ralph Emory
	Ol' Ralph has lost his memory
	Maybe too much Goody's Powder
	Oh yeah, Oh Yeah.

TTom
9.1726CAMONE::WAYSnake and NapeMon Apr 25 1994 15:3515
>Run C&W:
>	Spotlight on Ralph Emory
>	Ol' Ralph has lost his memory
>	Maybe too much Goody's Powder
>	Oh yeah, Oh Yeah.
>


Cool.

I picked up a free sample of Goody's powder at Pocono last year but haven't
ever used it....


'Saw
9.1727Tobin and KuiperCSC32::J_HENSONand it's still too short!Mon Apr 25 1994 16:3010
Did anyone catch the Colt's GM Tobin rip Mel Kuiper?  Can't say
that I blame him, even though I think that Kuiper is probably right
about the Colts' draft.

Anyway, it was kind of refereshing to hear someone put the so-called
experts in their place.  And just what is Mel Kuiper's claim to fame,
anyway?  I know he is regarded by the media as the guru of the NFL
draft, but I don't really know why.

Jerry
9.1728even MikeH has a life, relatively speaking :-)METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Apr 25 1994 16:445
Well outside of the NFL Draft, Mel Kiper has no life, I mean that is
all the guy does day in and day out.

The Crazy Met

9.1729had a pointHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderMon Apr 25 1994 16:588
I like Kiper's response. Something to the effect that if'n the Colts' guy's
worried about what Kiper said, it's no wonder that the Colts are drafting
second everyone year.

Kiper had a point in that Dilfer was up for grabs and the Colts are
looking at starting Jim Harbaugh.

TTom
9.1730CAMONE::WAYSnake and NapeMon Apr 25 1994 16:581
Yeah, I thought that was pretty cool......
9.1731the draft continuesHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderMon Apr 25 1994 17:04123
Article: 8442
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (AP)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football
Subject: Day 2 Of NFL Draft Starts Up
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 7:40:12 PDT
 
	NEW YORK (AP) -- In the new era of free agency, teams want
players who can play now, not take four years to develop and then
leave. So that's the way the first couple of rounds of the NFL
draft went.
	So ...
	The Cincinnati Bengals hope Dan Wilkinson will jump right in on
the defensive line. Jim Mora expects Joe Johnson to start for New
Orleans. Mike Holmgren wants Aaron Taylor to do the same for the
Green Bay Packers. Ditto for receiver Charles Johnson in
Pittsburgh.
	The search for instant contributors was the theme of Sunday's
NFL draft, the first of the free agent salary cap era. As
high-priced veterans are phased out under the cap, low-priced
rookies are brought in.
	The draft resumed Monday with a minor bang when the San Diego
Chargers traded fullback Marion Butts to New England in return for
the Patriots' third and fifth-round choices. The Chargers used the
third-rounder to select wide receiver Andre Coleman of Kansas
State.
	Cincinnati started the third round with another Ohio State
player to join Wilkinson, running back Jeff Cothran. Then
Indianapolis took tackle Jason Matthews of Texas A&M as the draft
began its long trek through the day.
	But few of these players will come close to big money right
away.
	One of the wrinkles of free agency is a separate rookie salary
cap that will hold down the payroll for first-year players.
	That's part of the contentious goings-on surrounding ``Big
Daddy'' Wilkinson, the 315-pound defensive tackle who was the top
pick overall by Cincinnati.
	Wilkinson's agent is Leigh Steinberg, one of the more
highly-regarded player representatives in football. He is dealing
with a team that is traditionally tight-fisted. The polarity of the
two sides could mean a long wait before Wilkinson shows up in
training camp.
	But Steinberg, who before the draft asked the Bengals to trade
the choice, was suggesting afterward that there's room for
agreement with general manager Mike Brown.
	``Look, our differences are philosophical,'' Steinberg said
after Wilkinson was drafted. ``It doesn't matter whether Mike is
negotiating with Henry Kissinger or Cindy Crawford -- he has a
strong philosophy and he expresses it. We also have a strong
philosophy. We're looking forward to what we hope is a smooth and
harmonious negotiation. I'm sure Dan will be signed and ready well
before training camp.''
	Wilkinson was a sophomore at Ohio State, and he led a crop of
underclassmen who were picked early.
	Eleven non-seniors were taken with the 29 picks of the first
round. It was also a draft for defense -- 10 of the first 13 picks
were for defenders.
	But most of all, it was a draft for players who can produce
immediately.
	``They've told me they want me to contribute right away,'' said
Charles Johnson, a receiver from Colorado who slipped down to the
17th spot largely because of the rush to draft defenders. Taylor,
an offensive lineman, was left at 16th for the same reason.
	In fact, the only offensive players taken early were running
back Marshall Faulk of San Diego State, by Indianapolis with the
second pick of the draft, and quarterbacks Heath Shuler of
Tennessee (third by Washington) and Trent Dilfer of Fresno State
(sixth by Tampa Bay).
	The fourth pick was defensive end Willie McGinest of Southern
Cal, a pass rusher who people in New England will expect Bill
Parcells to turn into Lawrence Taylor. Parcells was more inclined
to compare him to Chris Doleman, who was traded from Minnesota to
Atlana for the Falcons' top draft pick next year and a second-round
pick this year.
	``I think, at worst, that's what you've got,'' Parcells said.
``At worst, he's a good pass rushing defensive end and, at best,
he's a guy that can also drop into pass coverage.''
	McGinest was the man the Dallas Cowboys wanted but failed to
trade up for.
	When New England chose him, owner Jerry Jones, taking over for
departed coach Jimmy Johnson as the Cowboys' chief selector,
slumped over in his chair and slammed his forehead in frustration.
	The Cowboys ended up by moving up from 28th to 23rd and taking
Shante Carver, a hybrid like McGinest who is considered more a
long-term project.
	After McGinest, Indianapolis moved up to take Nebraska
linebacker Trev Alberts; the Bucs took Dilfer and San Francisco
moved up to take defensive tackle Bryant Young of Notre Dame to
plug the gaps in their defensive line. Then Seattle took another
defensive lineman, Sam Adams of Texas A&M.
	Cleveland took Alabama cornerback Antonio Langham with the ninth
pick; Arizona took linebacker Jamir Miller; Chicago took Alcorn
State linebacker John Thierry; the New York Jets got cornerback
Aaron Glenn of Texas A&M; and New Orleans took defensive end Joe
Johnson of Louisville.
	Then came three straight offensive linemen and staring with
Bernard Williams of Georgia to the Eagles. The Rams took Wayne
Gandy of Auburn and the Packers took Taylor. Then after the
Steelers took Johnson, the Vikings had two picks, taking cornerback
Dewayne Washington of North Carolina State and tackle Todd Steussie
of Cal.
	Miami went for defensive tackle Tim Bowens of Mississippi;
Detroit took wide receiver Johnnie Morton of Southern Cal, and then
came three surprises.
	First the Los Angeles Raiders took linebacker Rob Fredrickson of
Michigan State; the Cowboys took Carver, and the New York Giants
took wide receiver Thomas Lewis of Indiana. Lewis was so surprised
that he was asleep when the pick was made.
	For Fredrickson, it was a dream come true -- he wore No. 83 at
Michigan State because of his favorite, ex-Raider Ted Hendricks.
	``They always had a great winning tradition,'' he said. ``I just
became an instant fan. I couldn't be happier.''
	The first round concluded with Texas A&M running back Greg Hill
going to Kansas City; Houston taking defensive end Henry Ford of
Arkansas; Buffalo taking safety Jeff Burris of Notre Dame; San
Francisco taking fullback William Floyd of Florida, and Cleveland
taking wide receiver Derrick Alexander of Michigan.
	In the second round, the biggest moves were the products of
trades. The Vikings used Atlanta's second round pick to take David
Palmer, the all-purpose wide receiver-kick returner from Alabama
who can also play quarterback.
	Atlanta got a 1995 No. 1 pick back by trading wide receiver Mike
Pritchard to Denver, which already had signed another wide
receiver, Anthony Miller from San Diego.
9.1733PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Apr 25 1994 18:148
  The thing is, Kiper isn't held accountable if his choices are complete
  busts. But the Colts GM, coaches and scouts all have to deal with the 
  wrath of the fans and they have their jobs on the line.

  As far as I can tell, you can toss a coin to determine who is the better
  draft pick between Faulk, Alberts and Dilfer. They're all studs.

	Keith
9.1735should know his stuffFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixMon Apr 25 1994 18:361
    Tobin worked with Buddy Ryan to build the '86 Bears.
9.1736Mel's rightCNTROL::CHILDSBrillant, Charming and NastyMon Apr 25 1994 18:397
 he also said that because while Tobin was with the Bears they never
 drafted a small college player and they did waste a first on Harbaugh...

 ;^)


9.1737Rounds 3-4HBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderMon Apr 25 1994 20:5973
Article: 8445
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (AP)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football
Subject: NFL Draft List -- Rds. 3-4
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 10:40:25 PDT
 
	NEW YORK (AP) -- Selections Monday in the 1994 NFL draft with
team, player, projected position and college (x-compensatory
selection):
                            Third Round
	66, Cincinnati, Jeff Cothran, rb, Ohio State. 67, Indianapolis,
Jason Mathews, ot, Texas A&M. 68, Washington, Tydus Winans, wr,
Fresno State. 69, Tampa Bay, Harold Bishop, te, Louisiana State.
70, San Diego (from New England), Andre Coleman, wr, Kansas State.
71, Los Angeles Rams, Keith Lyle, db, Virginia. 72, Atlanta,
Anthony Phillips, db, Texas A&M-Kingsville. 73, Seattle, Lamar
Smith, rb, Houston. 74, Chicago, Jim Flanigan, dt, Notre Dame.
	75, Cleveland, Romeo Bandison, dt, Oregon. 76, Arizona, Rich
Braham, g, West Virginia. 77, Philadelphia, Joe Panos, g,
Wisconsin. 78, New England (from San Diego), Ervin Collier, dt,
Florida A&M. 79, New Orleans, Winfred Tubbs, lb, Texas. 80, Los
Angeles Raiders (from New York Jets), Calvin Jones, rb, Nebraska.
81, x-Buffalo, Marlo Perry, lb, Jackson State. 82, x-San Diego,
Willie Clark, db, Notre Dame. 83, x-Los Angeles Rams (from Atlanta
through Indianapolis), James Bostic, rb, Auburn.
	84, x-Green Bay (from San Francisco), LeShon Johnson, rb,
Northern Illinois. 85, x-San Francisco, Doug Brien, k, California.
86, x-Cincinnati, Steve Shine, lb, Northwestern. 87, San Francisco
(from Denver), Cory Fleming, wr, Tennessee. 88, Pittsburgh (from
Minnesota), Jason Gildon, de, Oklahoma State. 89, Arizona (from
Green Bay through Miami), Eric England, de, Texas A&M. 90, New
England (from Miami), Joe Burch, c, Texas Southern. 91, Pittsburgh,
Byron Morris, rb, Texas Tech. 92, Kansas City (from San Francisco),
Lake Dawson, wr, Notre Dame.
	93, Detroit, Shane Bonham, dt, Tennessee. 94, New York Jets
(from Los Angeles Raiders), Lou Benfatti, dt, Penn State. 95, New
York Giants, Gary Downs, rb, North Carolina State. 96, Kansas City,
Chris Penn, wr, Tulsa. 97, Washington (from Houston), Joe Patton,
g, Alabama A&M. 98, Buffalo, Corey Loucheiy, ot, South Carolina.
99, Atlanta (from Dallas through San Francisco and Denver), Alai
Kalaniuvalu, g, Oregon State. 100, x-Los Angeles Rams (from
Philadelphia through San Francisco), Ernest Jones, lb, Oregon. 101,
x-Houston, Malcolm Seabron, wr, Fresno State. 102, x-Dallas, George
Hegamin, ot, North Carolina State. 103, x-Philadelphia, Eric
Zomalt, db, California.
	------
                           Fourth Round
	104, Cincinnati, Corey Sawyer, db, Florida State. 105,
Washington, Kurt Haws, te, Utah. 106, Indianapolis, Brad Banta, te,
Southern Cal. 107, New England, Perry Carter, db, Southern
Mississippi. 108, Los Angeles Rams, Chris Brantley, wr, Rutgers.
109, Dallas (from Tampa Bay), Willie Jackson, wr, Florida. 110,
Seattle, Larry Whigham, db, NE Louisiana.
	111, Atlanta, Perry Klein, qb, C.W. Post. 112, Miami (from
Cleveland), Ronnie Woolfork, lb, Colorado. 113, Arizona, John
Reece, db, Nebraska. 114, Chicago, Raymont Harris, rb, Ohio State.
115, Arizona (from San Diego through Miami), John Reece, db,
Nebraska. 116, New Orleans, Doug Nussmeier, qb, Idaho. 117, New
York Jets, Orlando parker, wr, Auburn.
	118, Atlanta (from Philadelphia), Micth Davis, lb, Georgia. 119,
Houston (from Minnesota), Michael Davis, db, Cincinnati. 120, Los
Angeles Raiders (from Green Bay), Austin Robbins, dt, North
Carolina. 121, New England (from Miami through Arizona), John
Burke, te, Virginia Tech. 122, Pittsburgh, Taase Faumui, de,
Hawaii. 123, Denver, Randy Fuller, db, Tennessee State. 124,
Detroit, Vaughn Bryant, db, Stanford.
	125, Minnesota (from Los Angeles Raiders), Mike Wells, dt, Iowa.
126, Green Bay (from San Francisco through Los Angeles Raiders),
Gabe Wilkins, de, Gardner-Webb. 127, Kansas City, Bracey Walker,
db, North Carolina. 128, New York Giants, Chris Maumalanga, dt,
Kansas. 129, Houston, Sean Jackson, rb, Florida State. 130,
Buffalo, Sean Crocker, db, North Carolina. 131, Dallas, DeWayne
Dotson, lb, Mississippi.
9.1738HANNAH::ASHEThanks Zeke...Tue Apr 26 1994 23:535
    Kiper's a weasel... I thought Tobin was right...  I mean, if Kiper
    calls everyone's coach, mother, etc. and says the guys an easy 3rd
    rounder and he never gets drafted or signed, why build the kid up
    for that?
    
9.1739Leshon Johnson A Third Rounder???STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Apr 29 1994 20:255
      Why did Leshon Johnson drop so far?  Sport Magazine had him
      going like in the top FIVE overall picks!
    
      Being a Packer fan, I'm glad they got him, but does anyone
      know what's up???
9.1740CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Thu May 05 1994 18:245
    My BEAR_REPORT had him as a possible #1 for Da_Bearz, too.  When the
    Bears looked the other way in round three, I had to wonder what every
    one now knows...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.1741Big Daddy Signs TodayUSCTR1::GARBARINOThu May 05 1994 20:541
Dan "Big Daddy" Wilkinson signed with Cincinnati today ($16M ?).
9.1742big guy get big dollarsHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 05 1994 20:5664
Article: 8542
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (AP)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.ohio
Subject: Bengals Ink Big Daddy
Date: Thu, 5 May 94 11:10:22 PDT
 
	CINCINNATI (AP) -- Dan Wilkinson, the No. 1 pick in last month's
NFL draft, signed a six-year, $14.4 million contract Thursday,
ending one of the quickest negotiations with a top pick in
Cincinnati Bengals history.
	The signing came just 11 days after the draft and two weeks
after the sides appeared to be at a philosophical impasse.
	Wilkinson, a defensive lineman from Ohio State, will receive a
$5 million signing bonus. The Bengals had been opposed to large
signing bonuses.
	The contract also contains two ``voidable years,'' one of the
main areas of contention between the Bengals and agent Leigh
Steinberg. The last two years of the contract will be voided if
Wilkinson is on the field for an undisclosed number of plays this
season.
	``We hope this sends a message as to the sort of commitment we
have to bring our team back to the top,'' Bengals general manager
Mike Brown said.
	The Bengals wanted to break with their history of trouble
signing first-round picks so Wilkinson could be counted upon as a
starter. Wilkinson wanted to avoid a holdout.
	``Both parties agreed up front we'd try to set an all-time speed
record if possible,'' Steinberg said. ``Obviously, you have the
history. But it was really important to all the parties to have
this done quickly and expeditiously.''
	Steinberg has been involved in two lengthy holdouts by Bengals
first-round picks. Defensive lineman Jason Buck (1987) and
quarterback David Klingler (1992) missed training camp and
preseason before signing.
	It looked like another impasse developing when Brown offered
Wilkinson a contract a few days before the April 24 draft. That
offer included an average salary that was $500,000 less than
Indianapolis gave defensive lineman Steve Emtman two years ago.
Brown also rejected ``voidable years.''
	The contract Thursday adds up to $14.4 if Wilkinson plays all
six years, an average of $2.4 million a year -- slightly more than
Emtman got.
	In addition to the $5 million signing bonus, Wilkinson gets base
salaries of $965,000 this season; $1,206,000 in 1995; $1,447,000 in
1996; $1,688,000 in 1997; $1,930,000 in 1998; and $2,171,000 in
1999.
	By comparison, defensive lineman John Copeland -- the team's top
draft pick in 1993 -- signed a five-year contract for $5.8 million
in mid-August last year.
	Many draft analysts expected the Bengals to trade the top pick
in part because of their history of contract squabbles. Brown said
he never came close to making a deal with any of the 21 teams that
inquired.
	Wilkinson's contract eats up 55.3 percent of the team's money
for signing rookies.
	Steinberg said the NFL's current salary-pool arrangement will
encourage others to sign before a big chunk of a team's rookie
money is committed.
	``I believe this will be the fastest signing season in history
for NFL rookies because of the year's experience in how the rookie
salary cap operates,'' Steinberg said. ``Instead of players
competing against an owner's pocketbook and willingness to pay, now
it's seven draft picks competing with each other for a share of the
pie. Once the money is gone, it's gone.''
9.1743PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri May 06 1994 15:247
    Now that Rodney Peete is a Cowboy, will Doc root for the other Texas
    team?
    
    Now that the Jets have picked up Trudeau they will probably dump Nagle. 
    I suspect we'll see JoJ in here soon turning on Nagle they way he
    turned on Thomas and start singing the praises of this fine
    Indianapolis castoff.
9.1744HANNAH::ASHEHome of the driveby noter...Fri May 06 1994 18:201
    Already jumped to the Viking bandwagon
9.1745MKFSA::LONGTwo score ain't so badFri May 06 1994 19:407
>>    Already jumped to the Viking bandwagon

	Dr 00:00 won't let anyone else on.  Not that anyone wants on.



	billl
9.1746You cain thank me laterTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Mon May 09 1994 12:566
    Saw Dr. 00:00 this weekend.  He almost ran into me and my daughter
    after her softball game (she had two hits, her team won 20-4!).  The
    Doc was his usual self.  I made sure I didn't say hi to him from anyone
    in here.
    
    NAZZ
9.1747NFL scheduleHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 12 1994 15:10331
Article: 8577
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (The Associated Press)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football
Subject: NFL Weekly Schedule
Date: Tue, 10 May 94 16:10:20 PDT
 
                         All Times Eastern
                             Week One
                          Sunday, Sept. 4
	Atlanta at Detroit, 1 p.m.
	Cleveland at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	Houston at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	Kansas City at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
	Minnesota at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Philadelphia at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
	Seattle at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	Arizona at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
	Dallas at Pittsburgh, 4 p.m. (FOX)
	New England at Miami, 4 p.m.
	New York Jets at Buffalo, 4 p.m.
	San Diego at Denver, 8 p.m. (TNT)
                          Monday, Sept. 5
	Los Angeles Raiders at San Francisco, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                             Week Two
                          Sunday, Sept. 11
	Buffalo at New England, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
	Indianapolis at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles Rams at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	Miami vs. Green Bay at Milwaukee, 1 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	San Francisco at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
	Cincinnati at San Diego, 4 p.m.
	Denver at New York Jets, 4 p.m.
	Houston at Dallas, 4 p.m. (NBC)
	Seattle at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m.
	Washington at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
	New York Giants at Arizona, 8 p.m. (TNT)
                          Monday, Sept. 12
	Chicago at Philadelphia, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                            Week Three
                          Sunday, Sept. 18
	Arizona at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	Buffalo at Houston, 1 p.m.
	Green Bay at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
	Indianapolis at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
	Minnesota at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	New England at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	New Orleans at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	New York Jets at Miami, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles Raiders at Denver, 4 p.m.
	San Diego at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	San Francisco at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m. (FOX)
	Washington at New York Giants, 4 p.m.
	Kansas City at Atlanta, 8 p.m. (TNT)
                          Monday, Sept. 19
	Detroit at Dallas, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                             Week Four
	(Open Date: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia)
                          Sunday, Sept. 25
	Atlanta at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Cleveland at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles Rams at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
	Miami at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Houston, 4 p.m.
	New England at Detroit, 4 p.m.
	New Orleans at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	San Diego at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m. (NBC)
	Chicago at New York Jets, 8 p.m. (TNT)
                          Monday, Sept. 26
	Denver at Buffalo, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                             Week Five
	(Open Date: Denver, Kansas City, Los Angeles Raiders, San
Diego)
                           Sunday, Oct. 2
	Dallas at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	Green Bay at New England, 1 p.m.
	New York Jets at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	Seattle at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	Atlanta at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
	Buffalo at Chicago, 4 p.m.
	Minnesota at Arizona, 4 p.m.
	New York Giants at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
	Philadelphia at San Francisco, 4 p.m. (FOX)
	Miami at Cincinnati, 8 p.m. (TNT)
                           Monday, Oct. 3
	Houston at Pittsburgh, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                             Week Six
	(Open Date: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Pittsburgh)
                           Sunday, Oct. 9
	Indianapolis at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles Rams at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Miami at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	New Orleans at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	San Francisco at Detroit, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	Arizona at Dallas, 4 p.m.
	Denver at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	Kansas City at San Diego, 4 p.m. (NBC)
	Los Angeles Raiders at New England, 4 p.m.
	Washington at Philadelphia, 8 p.m. (TNT)
                          Monday, Oct. 10
	Minnesota at New York Giants, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                            Week Seven
	(Open Date: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota, Seattle,
Tampa Bay)
                         Thursday, Oct. 13
	Cleveland at Houston, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                          Sunday, Oct. 16
	Arizona at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
	Indianapolis at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles Raiders at Miami, 1 p.m.
	New England at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
	San Francisco at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	New York Giants at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Dallas, 4 p.m. (FOX)
	San Diego at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
                          Monday, Oct. 17
	Kansas City at Denver, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                            Week Eight
	(Open Date: Buffalo, Miami, New England, New York Jets)
                         Thursday, Oct. 20
	Green Bay at Minnesota, 8 p.m. (TNT)
                          Sunday, Oct. 23
	Chicago at Detroit, 1 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles Rams at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
	Seattle at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
	Washington at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	Atlanta at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m.
	Dallas at Arizona, 4 p.m. (FOX)
	Denver at San Diego, 4 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
                          Monday, Oct. 24
	Houston at Philadelphia, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                             Week Nine
	(Open Date: Atlanta, Los Angeles Rams, New Orleans, San
Francisco)
                          Sunday, Oct. 30
	Dallas at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
	Kansas City at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	Miami at New England, 1 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Cleveland at Denver, 4 p.m.
	Houston at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m. (NBC)
	Minnesota at Tampa Bay, 4 p.m.
	New York Jets at Indianapolis, 4 p.m.
	Seattle at San Diego, 4 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Arizona, 8 p.m. (TNT)
                          Monday, Oct. 31
	Green Bay at Chicago, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                              Week 10
                           Sunday, Nov. 6
	Chicago at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	Detroit vs. Green Bay at Milwaukee, 1 p.m.
	Indianapolis at Miami, 1 p.m.
	New England at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	New Orleans at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Houston, 1 p.m. (NBC)
	San Diego at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	San Francisco at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Arizona at Philadelphia, 4 p.m.
	Buffalo at New York Jets, 4 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	Denver at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
	Los Angeles Raiders at Kansas City, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
                           Monday, Nov. 7
	New York Giants at Dallas, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                              Week 11
	(Open Date: Indianapolis, Washington)
                          Sunday, Nov. 13
	Arizona at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
	Atlanta at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
	Chicago at Miami, 1 p.m.
	Cleveland at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
	Houston at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	Minnesota at New England, 1 p.m.
	San Diego at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
	Dallas at San Francisco, 4 p.m. (FOX)
	Los Angeles Raiders at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
	New York Jets at Green Bay, 4 p.m.
	Seattle at Denver, 4 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Detroit, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
                          Monday, Nov. 14
	Buffalo at Pittsburgh, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                              Week 12
                          Sunday, Nov. 20
	Cleveland at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	Green Bay at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	Indianapolis at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	Miami at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
	San Diego at New England, 1 p.m.
	Washington at Dallas, 1 p.m.
	Atlanta at Denver, 4 p.m.
	New Orleans at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m. (FOX)
	New York Jets at Minnesota, 4 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Arizona, 4 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	Los Angeles Rams at San Francisco, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
                          Monday, Nov. 21
	New York Giants at Houston, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                              Week 13
                         Thursday, Nov. 24
	Buffalo at Detroit, 12:30 p.m. (NBC)
	Green Bay at Dallas, 4 p.m. (FOX)
                          Sunday, Nov. 27
	Houston at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	Miami ay New York Jets, 1 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
	Chicago at Arizona, 4 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Denver, 4 p.m.
	Kansas City at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	Los Angeles Rams at San Diego, 4 p.m.
	New York Giants at Washington, 4 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m. (NBC)
	New England at Indianapolis, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
                          Monday, Nov. 28
	San Francisco at New Orleans, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                              Week 14
                          Thursday, Dec. 1
	Chicago at Minnesota, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                           Sunday, Dec. 4
	Dallas at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
	Green Bay at Detroit, 1 p.m.
	New York Jets at New England, 1 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	Washington at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	Arizona at Houston, 4 p.m. (FOX)
	Atlanta at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
	Denver at Kansas City, 4 p.m.
	Indianapolis at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	New Orleans at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
	New York Giants at Cleveland, 4 p.m.
	Buffalo at Miami, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
                           Monday, Dec. 5
	Los Angeles Raiders at San Diego, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                              Week 15
                         Saturday, Dec. 10
	Detroit at New York Jets, 12:30 p.m. (FOX)
	Cleveland at Dallas, 4 p.m. (NBC)
                          Sunday, Dec. 11
	Chicago at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Cincinnati at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
	Indianapolis at New England, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles Rams at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	Minnesota at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
	Denver at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m.
	San Francisco at San Diego, 4 p.m. (FOX)
	Seattle at Houston, 4 p.m.
	Washington at Arizona, 4 p.m.
	New Orleans at Atlanta, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
                          Monday, Dec. 12
	Kansas City at Miami, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                              Week 16
                         Saturday, Dec. 17
	Minnesota at Detroit, 12:30 p.m. (FOX)
	Denver at San Francisco, 4 p.m. (NBC)
                          Sunday, Dec. 18
	Atlanta vs. Green Bay at Milwaukee, 1 p.m.
	Cleveland at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles Rams at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	Miami at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	New England at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	San Diego at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Arizona, 4 p.m.
	Houston at Kansas City, 4 p.m. (NBC)
	New York Giants at Philadelphia, 4 p.m.
	Los Angeles Raiders at Seattle, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
                          Monday, Dec. 19
	Dallas at New Orleans, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                              Week 17
                         Saturday, Dec. 24
	Arizona at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	Buffalo at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	Dallas at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
	Green Bay at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	New England at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	Seattle at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	Kansas City at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m. (NBC)
	New Orleans at Denver, 4 p.m.
	New York Jets at Houston, 4 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at San Diego, 4 p.m.
	Washington at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
                          Sunday, Dec. 25
	Detroit at Miami, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
                          Monday, Dec. 26
	San Francisco at Minnesota, 9 p.m. (ABC)
                             	------
                             Playoffs
                         Saturday, Dec. 31
	AFC and NFC Wild Card (ABC)
                           Sunday, Jan. 1
	AFC and NFC Wild Card (NBC and FOX)
                          Saturday, Jan. 7
	AFC and NFC Divisional (NBC and FOX)
                           Sunday, Jan. 8
	AFC and NFC Divisional (NBC and FOX)
                          Sunday, Jan. 15
	AFC and NFC Championship (NBC and FOX)
                          Sunday, Jan. 29
	Super Bowl at Miami (ABC)
                           Sunday, Feb. 5
	Pro Bowl at Honolulu (ABC)
9.1748NFL NewsDELNI::FORGETTue May 17 1994 15:3711
    
    
     I read Sunday Globe and they said, the Raiders might move back to
    Oakland, depending on with or not the LA Coliseum is ready
    after the earthquake.  Al Davis is be doing a tour of it in the
    coming weeks.
    
    Also yesterday on ESPN, the Jaguars are being sued by the Car company
    on trademark rights.
    
    Mike
9.1749CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeTue May 17 1994 15:458
>    Also yesterday on ESPN, the Jaguars are being sued by the Car company
>    on trademark rights.
    
That would basically be Ford, because they own Jaguar now.  I'm surprised
that they can trademark something so common.....


'Saw
9.1750BROWNS to take it all!!!!BSS::J_VANMETERWed May 18 1994 14:408
    no no no.....   BROWNS & GIANTS in Super Bowl Next season!!!!!!!
    
    BROWNS winning in a blow out......
    
    its a given, bet the ranch........!
    
    jeff
    
9.1751CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeWed May 18 1994 15:0214
>
>    no no no.....   BROWNS & GIANTS in Super Bowl Next season!!!!!!!
>    
>    BROWNS winning in a blow out......
>    
>    its a given, bet the ranch........!
>    
>    jeff


I see that Robbie Bob's program to pass out daily rations of Prozac
has already hit Colorado Springs....
    

9.1752CSTEAM::FARLEYWed May 18 1994 15:2214
    
    
    	Yabbut is there anyway to close down the hailing frequencies
    coming from da Springs??????
    
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    thinkin jeff should have a p-name that says, "Dammit Jim, I'm a
    comedian, NOT a_intellectual!!!!"
    ;^)
    Kev
    
9.1753PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu May 19 1994 15:003
    Another reason for Doc to jump on the Vikes bandwagon:  According to a
    posting in the American Football notesfile, Minnesota has signed Andre
    Ware.
9.1754HANNAH::ASHEHome of the driveby noter...Thu May 19 1994 15:012
    Yup... he's looking to replace his Chuck Foreman jersey...
    
9.1755CTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Thu May 19 1994 15:253
    Now they git two Heisman winner QB's festering on the bench.
    
    
9.1756Inside Sports Top Twenty List?STRATA::BARBIERIWed Jun 01 1994 21:074
      Does anybody have the recent IS top twenty list for football
      players?  I'd love to see it.
    
                                                 Tony
9.1757CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricThu Jun 02 1994 12:478
Anyone seen the lame commercials on FOX for football yet?

I'm wondering just how lame this season is going to be -- the image over
substance approach of FOX will probably mean that I'm doing less watching
and enjoying more of the Sunday afternoons this fall....


'Saw
9.1758CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunThu Jun 02 1994 13:2116
> I'm wondering just how lame this season is going to be -- the image over
> substance approach of FOX will probably mean that I'm doing less watching
> and enjoying more of the Sunday afternoons this fall....


 That's certainly not what Beevis and Butthead think........

 ;^)

 Actually I'm looking forward to it. CBS' approached sucked imo. Bradshaw,
 Madden and Lundquist were their saving graces........

 mike


9.1759CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricThu Jun 02 1994 13:3521
>
> Actually I'm looking forward to it. CBS' approached sucked imo. Bradshaw,
> Madden and Lundquist were their saving graces........
>

This is true, but I'm not quite sure the circus that is Fox Broadcasting's
typical approach is going to do much for me, or a lot of other viewers.

I don't want flash, I don't want music video, I don't need to see
Martin Lawrence on the sidelines, or Sinbad in the lockerroom -- I just
want some football with some intelligent commentary.

If I want all that other stuff, there's other cable channels I can 
find it on....


'Saw




9.1761fox nfl telecasts for nh audience questionAKOCOA::BREENTurn down the lights, the parties overThu Jun 02 1994 13:546
    anyone from nh know if fox can pick up the occassional nfc patriots
    game without being blacked out?  What town in nh has a fox outlet?
    
    perhaps this will be moot if pats sell out
    
    
9.1762CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricThu Jun 02 1994 14:1328
>     Er, Saw? Don't you watch Melrose Place on that same Fox network?

Once in a while.

I also watch "The X Files" and "Star Trek: The Next Generation"


Why would I think they'd have their comedy stars there?  Well, perhaps
it's all those Sunday night lineups hosted by sports stars.   


>    there. No matter what, it still is only football and as long as 
>    they show video of the complete game what's the big deal if they
>    put a couple of sparklers on it? 

I think they'll at least have to show the complete game, or else folks
would be up in arms.

As to the sparklers, as long as it's in a commercial time period, when I
can go pee, no problem.  But if they've got the Fly Girls boppin' around
while John Madden is trying to telestrate, then I might get annoyed.


And, just for the record, this is all POPB(tm),

'Saw


9.1763METSNY::francusRangers,Knicks,Mets in '94Thu Jun 02 1994 14:378
Only time the Pats would be on FOX is a home game against an NFC opponent.
That probably doesn't occur very often. In any case I would guess that
the Pats will probably sell out most, if not all, their home games. Or
they will be close enough that WBZ will buy the remaining tickets.

The Crazy Met

9.1764MKFSA::LONGDancin' INSIDE the fireThu Jun 02 1994 14:4612
>>    anyone from nh know if fox can pick up the occassional nfc patriots
>>    game without being blacked out?  What town in nh has a fox outlet?

	In Merrimack, the local cable company carries Boston's FOX channel.
	(25, I think)

	As far as the Pats playing NFC team at home it happens four times
	this season.  Twice during preseason, New Orleans and Washington,
	and twince during the regular season, Green Bay and Minnesota.


	billl
9.1765METSNY::francusRangers,Knicks,Mets in '94Thu Jun 02 1994 14:557
re: .1764

Pre-season is not usually on the networks but on channels like 56, if
it is televised at all.

The Crazy Met

9.1766QUASER::JACKSONTABig Brown+lots of KokaneeThu Jun 02 1994 15:126
      I wouldn't think FOX will interupt $33mil dollar Madden.  I'm sure
    there 1st pre-game & post-game shows will have sirens and whistles.
    
      Please tell me Bradshaw didn't go to FOX!
    
      Tim
9.1767cable does me no goodAKOCOA::BREENTurn down the lights, the parties overThu Jun 02 1994 16:0012
    the cable wouldn't do me any good because warner will black out nashua
    if a boston station is involved.
    
    I was hoping for a direct uhf antenna pickup.  Possibly with a boston
    blackout (25) one of the small southern nh uhf outlets might buy the
    telelcast.
    
    nh stations like 9 (abc) are good at carrying sports events as a
    service to customers (who can always watch "the cat from outer space")
    another time unlike boston station managers who I have conlcuded just
    don't like sports and like to screw those who do whenever they have the
    slightest ratings justification for doing so.
9.1768Waste of moneyOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Jun 02 1994 16:014
    What still confuses me about Fox: Why did they have to pay such
    outlandish sums to Madden and Summerall? Didn't those guys need Fox
    more than vice-versa? Fox should realize NFC games will get big ratings
    no matter who aannounces.
9.1770CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunThu Jun 02 1994 16:156
 Besides what Tommy said, NBC was also courting Madden that's why FOX
 put up the bucks. Somerall I'm sure got a good offer to stay at CBS
 and do golf etc but I assume football's his number 1 love so he jumped.

mike
9.1771METSNY::francusRangers,Knicks,Mets in '94Thu Jun 02 1994 16:189
ABC apparently also was in the hunt for Madden. For him to go to an
"upstart" FOX had to make it very much worth his while.

Summerall did a lot of things at CBS and was a well known broadcaster.
But he really hit the bigtime over the last few years when paired up
with Madden.

The Crazy Met

9.1772PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jun 02 1994 16:345
9.1773CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricThu Jun 02 1994 17:379
>     (and I think ridiculous) belief that Fox' broadcasts will be some
>     sort of sideshow. 


What has Fox ever shown that was substantive?   Considering the rest 
of their broadcasting has a sort of sideshow flair, why not make the
logical leap of faith that their football broadcasts would cater to the
same image over substance crowd that most of the rest of their programming
caters to?
9.1774CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricThu Jun 02 1994 17:3815
9.1775Nobody watches announcersOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Jun 02 1994 17:449
    re: Fox and money.
    
    Credibility was obtained by buying the dominant football conference in
    the most popular sport while also getting the big marquee teams and
    cities(SF,Dallas,Giants,Chicago etc).
    
    What you guys are saying is that Madden is bigger than the game. I
    think Fox would have gotten top ratings no matter who announced.
    
9.1777CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricThu Jun 02 1994 19:1247
>       You said that you watch a handful of their shows. 

Right.  I watch a handful of their shows.  That doesn't mean that I 
haven't checked out a lot of their shows, and found them lacking.  Which
is ultimately why I watch just a handful.


>	Are you lumping
>       yourself in that "image over substance crowd"? 

I don't mind image if it accents something substantive.  A symphony
conductor who is all flash, but doesn't have the fundamentals down and
doesn't get the sound out of all those musicians is worthless.  However,
if the ear and musicianship are there, I can almost appreciate some of
the expressive flash.



>      And how much substance
>       do you expect from a football game? It's a friggin' game! It ain't

Fine, then give me THE GAME.  I don't wanna see Howie Long, no matter how
much I like him, running down the hall like some fake-ass-cop-wannabe
on speed and steroids, doing his best COPS imitation to help the guy
outta football withdrawal.

I had to put of with TWO years of that I'm a big (insert your favorite
insult here) FAN crapoloa from CBS, and was hoping for something a bit
better.


>       Upstairs Downstairs. The local Fox network here in Boston broadcasts 
>       Celtics games, I've yet to see any major differences between the way 
>       that they do the games and the way TV38, an independent station, used 
>       to do them other than better camera work. They certainly don't have 
>       bikini clad tootsies do half-time interviews.

Okay, I've never seen a Fox affiliate do sport.  They don't do that down
here.

Hopefully the main network will follow suit...


'Saw

    

9.1778So who does have better camera work?AKOCOA::BREENTurn down the lights, the parties overThu Jun 02 1994 19:524
    Tommy I didn't catch which of the stations (38 or 25) had the better
    camera work?  38 always seemed to have good skills except for an
    annoying habit in baseball games of always switching from the action to
    show the actual touching of homeplate (even when the play was at 3rd).
9.1779CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricThu Jun 02 1994 20:0412
>    annoying habit in baseball games of always switching from the action to
>    show the actual touching of homeplate (even when the play was at 3rd).

ESPN has a similar annoying habit in hockey.

If the puck goes into the corner they cut there, even though a hit has
already been made, perhaps, or the puck is on its way away....


'Saw


9.1780HANNAH::ASHELet me see shake yo tailfeather...Thu Jun 02 1994 20:1830
    From Doc...
1. Jim Brown - Led league in rushing 8 out of 9 seasons ...
2. LT - Redefined his position, and transformed the game ...
3. Jerry Rice - Will obliterate all receiving records by the time he's through.
4. Don Hutson - Staticstically dominated an era moe than anyone else has.
5. Joe Montana - Most accurate passer in history and ice in the big game.
6. Johnny Unitas - Like Montana ...
7. Otto Graham - 10 straight title games, 7 wins ...
8. Dick Butkus - Probably most intimdating player ever ...
9. Sammy Baugh - The best all-around player ever.
10. Walter Payon - Best all-around back.
11. O.J. - Most exciting back.
12. Joe Greene - Scared foes .. spit in face of Butkus, and he backed down ... 
led Steelers D.
13. Dan Marino - On pace to shatter all passing records.
14. Bob Lily - Leader of Doomsday D.
15. Chuck Bednarik - Last of the great 60-minute players.
16. Gino Marcheti - Would be far and away all-time sack leader if stat was kept 
...
17. Red Grange - Great runner, helped establish NFL.
18. Jim Parker - Best offensive lineman ever.
19. Mel Blount - Best pure CB, so good,he changed the rules.
20. Reggie White - Best DL since Joe Greene.

HONORABLE MENTIONS : Nagurski, Lambert, Mitschke, bradshaw, Munoz, Night Train 
Lane, Staubach, Gregg, Lott, Page, Deacon Jones, Motely, Dickerson, Dorsett, 
Groza, Thorpe, Sayers, and McElhenny.

Enjoy ...

9.1781MKFSA::LONGDancin' INSIDE the fireThu Jun 02 1994 20:267
	Am I the only one who is flabergasted that Warren M-O-O-N 
	(that spells chokster) is not anywhere to be found on Dr 00:00's
	list?



	billl
9.1783MKFSA::LONGDancin' INSIDE the fireThu Jun 02 1994 20:315
	With both Campbell and Moon missing this has got to be a fluke.



	billl
9.1784Where's Mr Ed Elway ??PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFThu Jun 02 1994 20:426
>	With both Campbell and Moon missing this has got to be a fluke.

  yea, well, without Bernadette Kosar on the list, Hal n Jeff are sure to be
  upset.

	Keith
9.1785QUASER::JACKSONTABig Brown+lots of KokaneeFri Jun 03 1994 02:063
    brashaw was spelled like that
    
     Tim
9.1786PTOVAX::JACOBThey're handing out buckets, start bailingFri Jun 03 1994 02:547
    M-O-o_n, that spells "over-rated", laws yes.
    
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
9.1787PTOVAX::JACOBHere's yer bucket, start bailing!!Fri Jun 03 1994 03:008
    
    M-O-O-N, that spells "over-rated", laws yes.
    
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
9.1788CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricFri Jun 03 1994 12:451
I'm surprised Sam Huff wasn't an honorable mention.....
9.1789DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameFri Jun 03 1994 12:483
    	Sam Huff was overrated.  Probably because he played in New York.
    
    				  /Don
9.1790CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricFri Jun 03 1994 12:526
>    	Sam Huff was overrated.  Probably because he played in New York.
    

He played in Washington too.

And more than anyone else, he had Big Jim Brown's numbah.....
9.1791Thoughts On Top 20STRATA::BARBIERIFri Jun 03 1994 12:5828
      I thought Deacon Jones should have cracked the top 20.
      How many sacks did he have?  I thought he was the most
      feared defensive lineman of them all.
    
      I had always heard of Bob Lilly and watched plenty of
      football when he played, but was a kid and didn't really
      study it.  I wish I had really watched him play.  Too bad.
    
      Jerry Rice at #3.  Quite an accolade and I fully support
      it.  By his second (or maybe it was his third) year in the
      NFL, I truly thought he was the greatest end ever.
    
      As a Packer fan, good to see Hutson so high.  I read that
      people who recently saw old films of him have stated that
      he would have been murder to cover today.
    
      I think Jim Brown's the best, but Sayer's yard/carry average
      before his injury might even have been higher than Brown's
      remarkable career 5.1.   And Brown had a much better supporting
      cast with his o-line, Frank Ryan at QB and Collins at end.  I 
      believe Sayer's had a year at something like 5.6 or 5.8!  Simply
      amazing.  I just liked Sayers the best.  If I could only have film 
      clips of one football player, there would be absolutely no hesitation 
      on who it would be - Gayle Sayers.   Without his injury, I might 
      have him cracking the top three even.
    
                                                    Tony
      
9.1792WHAT?!!STRATA::BARBIERIFri Jun 03 1994 13:002
      I reread the list and I cannot believe Sayers did not make
      the top twenty.
9.1793TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Fri Jun 03 1994 13:1011
Interesting discussion.

For the brief period he played, I've never seen another football player like 
Sayers.  He was the focal point of every play that he was on the field.  The 
closest I've seen is OJ.

From my o-lineman and Packer-centric point of view, I would think that Jerry 
Kramer should be mentioned, as well as John Hannah.  I also think that Dick 
Butkis was the greatest defensive player ever.

=Bob=
9.1794MKFSA::LONGDancin' INSIDE the fireFri Jun 03 1994 13:1410
	Yunz have to consider the source of this "list".  Dr 00:00 has
	been known to say things like, "Earl Campbell was the best in his day"
	and "Moon is easily the best qb to play the game."

	Why he then chooses to leave his #1 and #2 idols out of his "list"
	is still a mystery.



	billl
9.1795Are we sure that's Doc's list, and not Sport mag's again?NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jun 03 1994 13:231
    
9.1796MKFSA::LONGDancin' INSIDE the fireFri Jun 03 1994 13:368
>> Title:  Are we sure that's Doc's list, and not Sport mag's again?

	Considering the first line of .1780 says "from Doc".  And each
	of the tidbits following the names sound like his justification
	of why they are rated where they are, I'd say it's his.


	billl
9.1797HANNAH::ASHELet me see shake yo tailfeather...Fri Jun 03 1994 13:373
    It's Inside Sport's list, not Doc's...
    
    
9.1798Doc's too predictable for that... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jun 03 1994 13:4210
    
>    It's Inside Sport's list, not Doc's...
    
    That's what I thought, since that's where Doc's hoops list came from.  
    I had a hard time believing that a couple of old Baltimore Colts' 
    legends like Gino Marchetti and Jim Parker would be making any list 
    of Doc's...
    
    glenn
    
9.1799Another Packer-centricSTRATA::BARBIERIFri Jun 03 1994 16:0612
      re: .1795
    
      I'm a Packer fan too.  Correct me if I am wrong, but Kramer did
      not even make the Hall of Fame, did he?  Maybe he did..I'm not
      sure.  Notice the mention of Forrest Greg whom Lombardi called
      the closest thing to a perfect football player he had ever seen.
    
      The one other name that I came up with that didn't crack the
      top 20 (besides Deacon Jones and Gayle Sayers) was John Hannah.
      But, I honestly just don't know enough about offensive line.
    
                                               Tony                   
9.1800Just KiddingSTRATA::BARBIERIFri Jun 03 1994 16:092
      WHERE'S NORM BULAICH?!!!  You mean Norm Bulaich didn't crack 
      the top 20???    :-)
9.1802Jim Brown was gawdCTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Fri Jun 03 1994 16:1814
    Yeah,
    Sam Huff had Jim Brown's number all right....the one on the
    back of Brown's jersey that Huff's facemask was up agin
    10 yards downfield..
    
    But Huff had this to say about Brown.. When asked why Brown always
    made it look like it was so tough for him to get back up and back
    into the huddle, Huff retorted "Well if you think he had a tough time
    gettin' up, you shoulda seen how tough it was takin' him down."
    
    My money? Jim Brown and Gale Sayers above all.. Payton a little behind.
    
    MikeL
     
9.1803CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricFri Jun 03 1994 18:333
Whatever....

I ain't in the mood to argue it today.  
9.1804More BearzCSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Fri Jun 03 1994 20:013
    Red Grange shoulda made da' list...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.1806CAMONE::WAYAlas poor baldricMon Jun 06 1994 13:066
>    
>     There's really nothing to argue about. Huff himself said that no
>     one man could bring Jim Brown down just slow him up.
>

Whatever you say.....
9.1807IMOKIRKTN::DWALLACENymphing maniacMon Jun 06 1994 16:546
    Can't believe you didn't list/mention two of the 80's best WR's :
    
    Steve Largent   -   skillful & the most intelligent reciever i've seen.
    Mark Clayton    -   smooth professional
    
    Davie.
9.1808So Many Other Receivers ThoughSTRATA::BARBIERIMon Jun 06 1994 20:0916
      re -1
    
      I can see an argument for Largent, but Clayton's a reach.
      I'd place the following above him (all receivers)
    
      Paul Warfield
      Bobbie Mitchell
      Charley Taylor
      James Lofton
      Lynn Swann
      Ahmad Rashad
      Raymond Berry
          
      There are just too many receivers I'd place over Clayton.
    
                                              Tony
9.1809Huff meets Brown ...TAV02::CHAIMSemper ubi Sub ubi .....Wed Jun 08 1994 13:2221
I remember that when I was a kid many many moons ago, Sam Huff was invited to
speak at our local youth center. 

I recall the following story that he told us:

The Giants were playing the Browns. On the first play Jim Brown tries to come
through the middle and Sam Huff lays him flat. As Sam is getting up off of
Brown, he says "Brown, you stink!"

The next play is Brown again trying to break over left tackle. Again, Huff is
there and floors Brown. As he gets up he says, "Brown, you stink".

The next time Brown gets the ball, he heads straight for Huff and breaks the
tackle. As Huff is laying empty handed on the ground, Jim Brown, on his way to
the goal line, turns around and yells. "Huff, how do I smell from here?"

Great story!!!

Thanks,

Cb.
9.1810No Campbell, Moon, or Pastorini! ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jun 10 1994 16:5849
    
    Oh yeah, I almost forgot; Doc was so flattered the other night that 
    everyone could be so interested in his personal all-time NFL team he
    sent this along: 
    
    
From:	US1RMC::"George_Brooks.LOTUS@CRD.lotus.com"  8-JUN-1994 14:05:07.73

p.p.s. Doc's All-Time Team (1960-present)

Post if ya want to :

WR - Rice,Maynard
TE -  Winslow
T   -  Shell, B. Matthews
G   - Upshaw, Hannah
C    - Stephenson
QB  - Staubach
RB    - Brown, Simpson
3WR - Stallworth
3RB  - Payton
2TE  - Mackey
K      - M. Anderson

Apologies : M. Webster, D. Casper, S. Jurgenson, J. Parker, J. Montana, A. 
Monk, F. Bilentnkoff, E. Dickerson,
Ron Mix ..

Defense

DE - Reggie White, M. Olson
DT - J. Greene, A. Page
NT - C. Culp
MLB - Buktus
ILB   - H. Carson
OLB  - J. Ham
OLB  - L. Taylor
CB    - M. Blount, Night Train Lane
S      - R. Lott, K. Houston
XDB  - L. Barney (got to keep Walt quiet :-)
XDB  - Jimmy Johnson
P      - Ray Guy

Kick Returners - White Shoes Johnson and Rick Upchurch (I want to keep Sayers 
healthy)
Special Teams - Jack Tatum

Let the arguments begin, heh heh heh ...

9.1811MKFSA::LONGJumpin' gee hoser fats!Fri Jun 10 1994 18:378
	I guess he really has disowned the Oilers.  Only one I spotted in
	there was "white shoes"Johnson.

	A real closet Steeler fan, though.



	billl
9.1812HANNAH::ASHEI'm digging your sceneSun Jun 12 1994 14:522
    Matthews and Culp were Oilers at some point.
    
9.1813CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Mon Jun 13 1994 16:143
    Nagurski and Grange...  Forgotten ghosts...  sigh...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.1814MSE1::FRANCUSNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsWed Jun 15 1994 03:545
    LA Times reports that Simpson is the prime suspect in the death if his
    wife.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1815(8^0*PTOVAX::JACOBWed Jun 15 1994 05:1911
    I just saw the new Hertz commercial, it features OJ running thru an
    airport, with police in chase, and the Juice is carrying a knife...
    
    Actually, maybe that was one of Michael Jackson's gloves that they
    found at OJ's house, and he and OJ was "experimenting", thus the blood
    on the glove.
    
    Nah
    
    JaKe
    
9.1816HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Wed Jun 15 1994 15:295
    Frank Drubbin may have done it in an attempt to get OJ to switch from
    Hertz to Dollar rent-a-car.
    
    Sounds like OJ's in a heap o' trouble...
    
9.1817SOLANA::MAY_BRYankees are an embarassment-GeorgeKWed Jun 15 1994 15:294
    Police say they will be charging someone in the next day or two.  Does
    not look too good for OJ.
    
    brews
9.1818CAMONE::WAYThe last full measure of devotionWed Jun 15 1994 15:3011
>    Police say they will be charging someone in the next day or two.  Does
>    not look too good for OJ.
>    
>    brews

I'm no expert, but man, all the evidence is pointing one way......


8^(


9.1819METSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsWed Jun 15 1994 16:077
they need to get the results from tests they are doing on the bloodstained
glove. If it is the right blood type OJ is in real trouble.
But, from all the stuff I have heard all the evidence appears to 
be circumstantial.

The Crazy Met

9.1820CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Jun 15 1994 16:0910
    
    
    	Yabbut my money says it's a Bill Clinton conspiracy!
    While Mrs. President was meeting with the heads of Europe, Bill was
    chasin the ex-Mrs. OJ's skirt!
    
    I remain,
    thinkin OJ is being framed pretty well
    Kev
    
9.1821FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 15 1994 16:555
    It's obvious that if this was Joe Q. Public, there would be no question
    about his guilt.  Only the fact that he's an NFL HoF'er makes us hope.
    
    Supposedly there are scratches on his body too from the struggle.  I
    saw some film clips of his wife last night - she was a knockout.
9.1822CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Wed Jun 15 1994 17:064
|   It's obvious that if this was Joe Q. Public, there would be no question
|   about his guilt.  Only the fact that he's an NFL HoF'er makes us hope.
 
I've always admired your open-mindedness Mike... 
9.1823well at least 1 of themFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 15 1994 17:081
    Thanks Bob, it's what I do best.
9.1824CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Jun 15 1994 17:468
    Bullshit, Mike.
    
    Our whole legal process is predicated on the fact that one is innocent
    until proven guilty.  Sheesh, the guy hasn't even been arrested,
    indicted nor convicted, and you already have him going to the chair.
    
    
    Mark.
9.1825FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 15 1994 18:0413
>    Our whole legal process is predicated on the fact that one is innocent
>    until proven guilty.  Sheesh, the guy hasn't even been arrested,
    
    Why did the police have him in handcuffs if he was just being
    questioned?  Why was the matching blood-stained glove at his home?  Why
    is there blood on his driveway?  Why is there blood in his car?  Why
    are there scratches on his body?  If he didn't do it, he's the victim
    of one helluva frame job!
    
>    indicted nor convicted, and you already have him going to the chair.
    
    No I don't.  I'm just saying that appearances thus far don't look good
    for him.  The information thus far, if all true, says he's guilty. 
9.1826CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Jun 15 1994 18:1814
    No, "the information thus far" says there's blood on his driveway, blood
    in his car, scratches on his body, etc.  Nothing more, nothing less.
    
    Even if there was *overwhelming* evidence against him, the state of CA
    would still have to provide enough proof to get a jury to convict him.
    I'm glad you're not on the jury.
    
    Circumstantial does not mean overwhelming.  People can go to great
    lengths to stage "the perfect crime".  Hell, Chuck Stuart even shot
    himself.
    
    Things are not necessarily as they appear.
    
    Mark.
9.1827Funny Buisness going on ...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Jun 15 1994 18:4812
    So lets say Mr X killed OJ's wife... How hard would it be to drive
    accross town to OJ's home put some blood in his car/driveway leave
    a glove hidden somewhere (Not hidden very well) and then leave town ?
    
    The only thing that has potential is his scratches ? IF he has recent
    scratches and she has skin samples under her fingernails he could be
    in serious trouble.. The rest is circumstansial...
    
    Of course I dont by this waiter to the home at midnight to deleiver a
    pair of glasses :-)
    
    							mab
9.1828I hope it's not true butPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFWed Jun 15 1994 19:049
  And in addition to everything said in the previous notes, OJ pleaded
  "No Contest" in charges of beating his ex-wife a few months ago. Also, a 
  therapist of OJ's ex has said that she told him that OJ had threatened to 
  kill her on more than one occasion.

  Ya gotta sit back and let the police do their job but if everything we hear
  on the news media is true, it don't look too good fer the Juice.

	Keith
9.1829CAMONE::WAYThe last full measure of devotionWed Jun 15 1994 19:1514
Handcuffs are standard procedure when the police are doing the type
of investigation they did at his house the other day.

While it is humiliating to the handcuffee, the police won't take chances,
no matter who it is.   The most unassuming, innocent looking people have
pulled knives, guns etc at moments when you'd never expect it.

So, they handcuff the people for everyone's safety.


Oh, by the way, I heard today there was no glove, just bloodstains.....


'Saw
9.1830MKFSA::LONGI was country when country wasn't coolWed Jun 15 1994 19:197
>>  but if everything we hear on the news media is true,

	Quite the lead in!



	billl
9.1831HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Wed Jun 15 1994 20:105
    Did the determine a time of death?  Could he have enough time to do
    this, drive home, drop the blood, change, and make a plan at LAX
    in 45 minutes?  They were guessing 11:00 and he had an 11:45 flight,
    right?
    
9.1832Might have link to scene of the crimeSNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Thu Jun 16 1994 12:3613
    
    	Some of the evidence is very circumstantial and so obvious. You
    see blood here, blood there, and you wonder could anybody be so
    stupid?  If you look at it from a "frame job" point of view. A question
    you have to ask is. How did they bypass the security system at OJ's
    house?
    	As I'm typing this the radio just reported.  There were 3 types of
    blood found at the scene of the crime. Two match the murder victims,
    the 3rd is the same type as OJ's. They are running DNA tests on the
    blood against that taken from OJ. If it matches they can place him at
    the scene of the crime.
    
    Ron
9.1834MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Jun 16 1994 12:523
	If it took a legal conviction to say anything in public about
	the likelihhood of guilt, then no one would have anything against
	Richard Nixon.
9.1835Get facts straightTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Jun 16 1994 13:2613
    OJ did NOT plead no contest to beating his wife a few months ago.
    That took place in 1989, when theyt were still married.
    
    The time of death has been placed at about 11:00 PM.  Goldman left the
    restaurant after 9:30 to bring the glasses to OJ's ex.  OJ took a limo
    to the airport and took an 11:45 flight.  It may be tight, but there's
    enough time in there to do the deed, drive home, and jump in the limo.
    
    Still, it sounds like a frame-up to me.  Why would he leave that glove
    around?  It's way too obvious.
    
    NAZZ
    
9.1836BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredThu Jun 16 1994 13:436

	Didn't read the article, but the headline said that OJ has an alibi.
	Said he was at his home.

	Kevin
9.1837HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Thu Jun 16 1994 13:454
    One theory is the killing happened at OJ's place, he dropped the bodies
    off outside the condo, and came back or took the limo.  Her place was
    on the way to the airport.  That would also explain the blood in the
    driveway and in the car...
9.1838CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Thu Jun 16 1994 13:4522
>    The time of death has been placed at about 11:00 PM.  Goldman left the
>    restaurant after 9:30 to bring the glasses to OJ's ex.  OJ took a limo
>    to the airport and took an 11:45 flight.  It may be tight, but there's
>    enough time in there to do the deed, drive home, and jump in the limo.

Yeah, that's true, but man, he'd have had to be pretty cool.  They said
that he was very relaxed when he got into the limo.

Assuming, for a second, that he just snapped and wipe the two of them
out, he'd still have had to be kind of pumped up and I'm sure that would
have been noticeable.   He'd have to be one cool customer to be that
relaxed.

The last time I beat someone within an inch of their life it took me
a long time to calm down afterwards...

    
>    Still, it sounds like a frame-up to me.  Why would he leave that glove
>    around?  It's way too obvious.
    
I'm hearing reports now that there was no glove.    

9.1839CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Thu Jun 16 1994 13:5324
>    One theory is the killing happened at OJ's place, he dropped the bodies
>    off outside the condo, and came back or took the limo.  Her place was
>    on the way to the airport.  That would also explain the blood in the
>    driveway and in the car...

That one would be tough.

From what I've heard reported, Goldman or whatever his name was put up
one hell of a struggle.  I saw the area at her house where the bodies
were found on a clip on TV last night -- I've seen pigs slaughtered and
flopping around that have left less blood than there was on that walkway.

His driveway was relatively clean compared to that, from all reports that
I've heard.


I discount the killed them at home and dropping them off.  Besides, what
would Goldman or whatever his name was be doing at OJ's place...  I don't
get it....


'Saw


9.1841HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Thu Jun 16 1994 13:583
    Don't know.  This came as a theory from someone I know at the Long
    Beach Police Dept...
    
9.1842METSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsThu Jun 16 1994 13:594
how is Sherri doing??

The Crazy Met

9.1843Wanna buy a bridge in Brooklyn?CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Thu Jun 16 1994 13:5920
|>    The last time I beat someone within an inch of their life it took me
|>    a long time to calm down afterwards...
|
|    Huh?  I actually laughed when I read this...  didn't you say you were
|    the most non-violent person you know?



 
	a)  I know some pretty violent people

	b)  I haven't always been non-violent

	c)  The a__hole deserved it

	d)  The therapy has worked wonders..... I'm good enough,
	    I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people are afraid
	    of me.

	e)  Never, NEVER, **EVER** take my beer from me....
9.1844CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Thu Jun 16 1994 14:018
>    Don't know.  This came as a theory from someone I know at the Long
>    Beach Police Dept...

Obviously she didn't check out the crime scene.

Tell her I said she should be ashamed of herself....8^)
    

9.1845CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu Jun 16 1994 14:0311
The latest I heard (this morning) on OJ, based on media reports:

	o There was no glove found.
	o His new lawyer released a chronology of OJ's actions for the night, 
	  which places him waiting for his limo to the airport when the crime
	  was committed.
	o Results of the DNA test won't be available for a couple months.
	o It is expected that an indicment will happen in the next couple of 
	  days.

=Bob=
9.1846METSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsThu Jun 16 1994 14:057
News report as I was driving in said that there was a glove; lawyer
for OJ denied it.

Also OJ's new lawyer will be using his old lawyer as a consultant.

The Crazy Met

9.1847FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaThu Jun 16 1994 17:0814
    Careful Tommy, Lufay will get upset at you too for sending OJ to the
    chair already.
    
    One clarification: the blood at the scene of the crime is OJ's *TYPE*. 
    There are probably millions with the same type as him, including his
    kids who lived in the house.  DNA testing will take 2 months to
    determine if it's actually his blood.
    
    Here's a couple tough things to consider:
    
    - California has the death penalty (done by lethal injection).  If
      convicted, OJ may be facing this.
    
    - If convicted, do you think he should remain in the HoF?
9.1848METSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsThu Jun 16 1994 17:1410
> If convicted, do you think he should remain in the HoF?

absolutely! I also happen to believe that Pete Rose and Shoeless Joe
Jackson should be in the HoF.

Players should get into the HoF based on what they did on the field.

The Crazy Met

9.1849CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu Jun 16 1994 17:569
|> If convicted, do you think he should remain in the HoF?

|absolutely! I also happen to believe that Pete Rose and Shoeless Joe
|Jackson should be in the HoF.

|Players should get into the HoF based on what they did on the field.

I actually agree with TCM here...
9.1850same for Rose and JacksonFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaThu Jun 16 1994 18:001
    I agree too, just wanted to see what others thought.
9.1851DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameThu Jun 16 1994 18:018
9.1852HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Thu Jun 16 1994 18:094
    She's in a class this week so she hasn't been able to do the
    investigating....  she's fine... she's talking about swinging east
    in August...
    
9.1853What do the experts think...KALVIN::MORGANThu Jun 16 1994 18:253
    Should OJ's number still be proudly displayed at Rich Stadium?
    
    					Steve
9.1854CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Thu Jun 16 1994 18:283
Hey, if it was A Pos blood, I could have done it....

/Don, it wasn't a girl scout, it was an ex-con who took my beer one night ;^)
9.1855SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindThu Jun 16 1994 18:363
    Steve, should his number be taken down until he's had a trial first?
    
    
9.1856DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameThu Jun 16 1994 18:525
9.1858was in Soapbox tooFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaThu Jun 16 1994 19:311
    I've heard the same, Tommy.
9.1859$$$ doesn't buy happiness eh?QUASER::JACKSONTAWelcome to the MachineFri Jun 17 1994 12:0712
      I heard the limo driver said O.J. was late and when he did show up
    that he was sweating.
    
      The media has him convicted already and he hasn't even been arrested
    yet.
    
      From all this flaky evidence leaked thru the media, it sounds like a
    frame.  If not, then the old saying that maybe he took one too many
    hits to the head.  Your average person isn't as stupid enough to "set
    himself up" unless thats what he wanted.
    
      Tim
9.1860PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jun 17 1994 16:177
  On the radio this morning, I heard that the limo driver told the police that
  he waited a half hour at OJ's house with no indication that anyone was home.
  Also, the police think they have the murder weapon which was found in OJ's 
  house. They also said something about a mask being recovered. An arrest 
  or an indictment by a grand jury is imminent.

	Keith
9.1861RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jun 17 1994 16:238
    Too many hits to the head?  Yup, but not the kind you get on the
    football field.
    
    Rumors are circulating fast-and-furious that O.J. had some big-time
    substance abuse problems, which would easily explain away his "stupidity".
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.1862FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaFri Jun 17 1994 16:466
    He was framed so good, the framer put scratches on the framee.
    
    Police are saying they have enough to bust him now, just giving him a
    day to confess.
    
    Supposedly the weapon has been found.
9.1863PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jun 17 1994 16:523
  Younze guys who think he's being framed have been watching too much TeeVee.

	Keith
9.1864CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Fri Jun 17 1994 17:4212
Dr. Henry Lee, the State of Connecticut Medical Examiner (and a world
reknowned forensics expert) has been retained by OJ's attorney.

Lee will be working on the case using his vacation time, and any profit
he makes will be donated to the Ct State Dept of Public Safety and
a scholarship fund at UConn.

If OJ *is* being framed, Lee is the guy who can find that out.  He's 
an amazing man.....


'Saw
9.1865BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredFri Jun 17 1994 17:505

	OJ has been charged.

	Kevin
9.1866FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaFri Jun 17 1994 17:583
    Yup, it's official - charged on 2 counts of murder.  CNN is now reporting 
    a second suspect.  OJ is scheduled to make a statement within the next 2 
    hours.
9.1867CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Fri Jun 17 1994 17:586
>
>	OJ has been charged.
>


Yes.  Our radio reports that there are TWO suspects!   Go figure.....
9.1868more on OJ's chargesHBAHBA::HAASAte a hot dog, made me feel goodFri Jun 17 1994 18:1714
Latest, as it happens:

The LAPD have confirmed the CNN report that OJ has been charged with the
2 murders. They are denying the part about the second suspect and are
saying that there are no other suspects, at least not now. CNN continues
to talk about a second suspect, nonetheless.

OJ will be arraigned at 5pm today and he is either in custody or on his
way to surrendering with his lawyer.

And now, CNN is working the angle that he's black and she's white, like
this aint screwed up enough already.

TTom
9.1869no bail for OJ; possible deathHBAHBA::HAASAte a hot dog, made me feel goodFri Jun 17 1994 18:266
Another update.

The charges against OJ qualify for consideration of the death penalty.
And, meanwhile, OJ is being held *WITHOUT* bail.

TTom
9.1870CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Fri Jun 17 1994 19:385
    I wonder what Swonger has to say 'bout this...
    
    I think he's in AMERICAN_FOOTBALL at times...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.1871HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 17 1994 20:1012
  From watching the Menendez Brothers trial on TV I remember hearing that in
California if a jury finds that a murder is premeditated they can find that
it was murder in the 1st degree. If a jury finds that a 1st degree murder was
committed with "special circumstances", then the judge can order the death
penalty. 

  One of the criteria for "special circumstances" is a multiple murder. 

  The Juice is in trouble.

  :*({
  George
9.1872the Juice is Loose!FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaFri Jun 17 1994 21:111
    OJ hasn't shown up!  He's probably in Mozambique by now.  
9.1873Maybe he will bleach like MJ?QUASER::JACKSONTAWelcome to the MachineFri Jun 17 1994 22:456
      Since the charges have been filed, I am assuming that the DNA results
    showed that it twas the juice man...That to me would be the evidence
    to actually arrest him.  Typically the fuzz won't file charges unless
    they have some concrete evidence to try and convict a person.
    
      Tim
9.1874PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jun 17 1994 22:5715
>    to actually arrest him.  Typically the fuzz won't file charges unless
>    they have some concrete evidence to try and convict a person.
    
   ABC had some retired NYC homicide detective on the air. He said that
   since the Juice is/was a celebrity and since he's got a lot of high priced
   lawyers, they would be extra careful before issuing an arrest warrant.
   If this wus an average guy, he wouldda been in the slammer a lot sooner.

   And now, they finally issue the warrant and since he's a celebrity,  they
   call him up and ask him to turn himself in. He says sure, I'll be there
   in half an hour and then skips town. If they really think he wus the guy
   who brutally sliced those two people up, they shouldda gone to his house
   with their guns drawn and then dragged him out in chains. 

	Keith	
9.1875QUASER::JACKSONTAWelcome to the MachineSat Jun 18 1994 12:2813
       What a joke last night.  The media circus covering the OJ ford
    Bronco through the city and waisting air time covering a suicidal man
    just sitting in the Bronco.
    
       I walked in after he was already sitting in his driveway for an
    hour, and the wife says this has been on a while, then she wouldn't let
    me turn the channel (wanted to watch the end of the BBall game).  I
    watched for ~ 30 mins and fell asleep on the Lazy boy.
    
       Then there were all those people crowding outside his home.  Those
    people need to get a life!!
    
       Tim
9.1876WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Sat Jun 18 1994 13:198
    
    
    
        Plus there were thousands of people on the freeways, waving and
    cheering? Hard to believe people would be cheering?
    
    
    Chap
9.1877For O.J.WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Sat Jun 18 1994 15:3510
    
    
       Song of the day.
    
    
        "Highway to Hell"
    
    
    
    Chap
9.1878SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindMon Jun 20 1994 11:533
    Seems to me that I heard that DNA testing takes weeks, not days.
    
    Lee
9.1879CAMONE::WAYFarewell #11Mon Jun 20 1994 12:458
>    Seems to me that I heard that DNA testing takes weeks, not days.

Yes, DNA testing takes several weeks.

They're going, among other things, on the basis of matching blood types....


'Saw
9.1880A dream shatteredPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Jun 20 1994 15:0837
  For me, the biggest tragedy in sports was when Roberto Clemente's
  plane crashed in the Caribean. But what I witnessed Friday night on TV
  was much, much worse. I was totally appalled watching people shout "Go 
  Juice Go". What if you were a friend or relative of the 2 people who were
  butchered and happened to watch what was going on ? I could understand 
  people being curious and stopping to watch but the circus atmosphere was
  sickening.

  I have a great deal of compassion for the freinds and relatives of the 2 
  people slain and for the whole Simpson family for they are all truely
  innocent and victims of a horrible crime. But if OJ is guilty, I have no
  compassion in my heart.

  I'm about the same age as OJ. I remember watching him at USC and knew he was
  something very special. All through his college and pro career, he always
  played with dignity and style. You never saw him showboating after a TD or
  taunting another player or fighting or any of the other things I find so
  repulsive with many modern athletes. I remember when he gained over 250
  yards against my beloved Steel Curtain Defense. I didn't hate or dislike
  him, I could only marvel at the artistry of a great, great football player. 
  For almost 3 decades, the Juice has been on TV and after a while, you almost
  felt like you knew him. With this whole thing coming down, I feel like
  it's happening to friend or a cousin or somebody I knew at work. Whenever
  I see the Trojan ride his horse into the stadium, I'll never feel the same.

  My God, what has our Sports world and society come to ? Did anyone else watch
  NBC's split screen broadcast. On one side you could watch the Knicks and
  Rockets mug each other while on the other screen you could watch the cops
  following OJ's Bronco while he had a loaded gun to his head.

  If I could say something to OJ, I would say this. "If you're not guilty,
  then fight the charges with everything you've got. If you're guilty, tell
  the truth and you'll gain a small amount of respect and you'll be able to 
  sleep better. But you should also realize that you can never walk to streets
  of America as a free man".

	Keith
9.1881CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsMon Jun 20 1994 15:3475
>  For me, the biggest tragedy in sports was when Roberto Clemente's
>  plane crashed in the Caribean. But what I witnessed Friday night on TV
>  was much, much worse. I was totally appalled watching people shout "Go 
>  Juice Go". What if you were a friend or relative of the 2 people who were
>  butchered and happened to watch what was going on ? I could understand 
>  people being curious and stopping to watch but the circus atmosphere was
>  sickening.

I've seen a lot of tragedy in sports in my lifetime (and I'm only 35),
from the massacre at Munich, the terrible spectator deaths at Wembley,
car crashes in auto racing, Thurmon Munson, the aforementioned Clemente....

Friday night, I was watching the basketball game, one of the few times
I've watched hoops all year, when my Mom called and said "turn on
channel 3".

For the next bunch of hours I watched the pursuit.


>  I have a great deal of compassion for the freinds and relatives of the 2 
>  people slain and for the whole Simpson family for they are all truely
>  innocent and victims of a horrible crime. But if OJ is guilty, I have no
>  compassion in my heart.

All I could feel was sad.

Sad for OJ, sad for his family and the families of the deceased.  Sad for
everyone.

Even if OJ is guilty, I still feel compassion.  I don't know why, but I
do.   


>  My God, what has our Sports world and society come to ? Did anyone else watch
>  NBC's split screen broadcast. On one side you could watch the Knicks and
>  Rockets mug each other while on the other screen you could watch the cops
>  following OJ's Bronco while he had a loaded gun to his head.

Our society is one really f___ed up place.  Everyone has an axe to grind,
everyone feels they have the right to impose their will on everyone else,
personal freedoms are shrinking.

The high-technology of the media have made any "celebrity's" life hell.
In the old days, the days of newsreels and print media, sports writers would
temper their pieces with compassion -- right or wrong it was what was done
I think.  

The media reminds me of that song by Don Henley -- Dirty Laundry.

I watched Dan and Connie -- I have never seen two more stupid individuals.
I'm surprised Dan Rather ever made it through the Marine Corps, because
anyone with two eyes and half a brain could have seen the person in 
the white t-shirt ran through the gate just behind the Bronco.

Just an example of how dumb folks in the media have become....



>  If I could say something to OJ, I would say this. "If you're not guilty,
>  then fight the charges with everything you've got. If you're guilty, tell
>  the truth and you'll gain a small amount of respect and you'll be able to 
>  sleep better. But you should also realize that you can never walk to streets
>  of America as a free man".

If OJ did it, he deserves to get what any other regular Joe would get
under the circumstances....


All I can say is that this is really sad......


'Saw



9.1882ANGLIN::WIERSBECKOJ tackled on highway of realityMon Jun 20 1994 15:562
    
    
9.1883CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Jun 20 1994 15:573
    Wasn't Barbara Walters a piece of work?
    
    Mark.
9.1885ABC OPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Mon Jun 20 1994 16:033
    Did anyone hear that Howard Stern caller on ABC's feed? During these
    live broadcasts,you really find out which commentators have anything
    upstairs.
9.1887Go Juice, Go. (Go Directly to Jail, Do Not Pass Go.)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Jun 20 1994 16:139
    Yea, I heard the ABC feed.  With a choper hovering directly overhaid, I
    wonder exactly what kind of "insight" they were expecting from a
    neighbor who was supposedly looking out his window?
    
    That Barbara Walters, .... what a piece of work.  (Al Michaels has
    class and perspective though, IMO.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.1888CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsMon Jun 20 1994 16:1721
>    That Barbara Walters, .... what a piece of work.  (Al Michaels has
>    class and perspective though, IMO.)
    
I didn't watch the ABC feed.

Al Michaels however, never fails to impress.  Ever since his coverage of the
earthquake during the WS, I've never thought of his as just a sportscaster...


Dan and Connie took the cake however.  While their local (LA) affiliate
was running audio from scanners picking up police broadcasts and there
was excellent commentary from local reporter Bob Tur in the chopper, Dan
and Connie kept running the most insipid dialog, interspersed with
Cardashian reading OJ's letter....

CNN (which my mom was watching) had them scooped on EVERYTHING that took
place in the yard, up until just before the cops said everything was
all clear.....


Dan and Connie suck......
9.1889I don't understandVAOP28::RiceIt can't happen hereMon Jun 20 1994 16:2320
I think I've been out of the States too long - I'm missing
something here....

Why is this so important? Why would anybody want to watch a
car driving down the freeway? There are manhunts and fugitives
being chased every day by the hundreds - what's the big deal?
NBC will televise the arraignment LIVE! Why would anybody
want to watch? From a Canadian perspective this whole thing
is totally insane. Innocent or guilty, OJ has some problems.
Let the man be.....this is not like the Cuban Missile Crisis....

My feeling was that the media was *praying* for OJ to blow
his brains out on national TV. How sick is that? Why else would
they cut away from the 4th quarter of the championships to focus
on a van hidden by a tree? This is too weird for words.

josh


9.1890CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsMon Jun 20 1994 16:2820
>
>My feeling was that the media was *praying* for OJ to blow
>his brains out on national TV. How sick is that? Why else would
>they cut away from the 4th quarter of the championships to focus
>on a van hidden by a tree? This is too weird for words.


Oh, no doubt.  Ratings would have SOARED if OJ had pulled the
trigger on that gun and splattered his frontal lobe all over the
windows of that Bronco.

The media today is rife with the Image over Substance thing.
While the networks are not to the level of Weekly World News and the
National Enquirer, but it is quickly moving in the direction of
Hard Copy and Inside Edition.....

JMHO,
'Saw


9.1891Forget the facts, it's now important what media celebs *feel*NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Mon Jun 20 1994 16:3424
> My feeling was that the media was *praying* for OJ to blow
> his brains out on national TV. How sick is that? Why else would
> they cut away from the 4th quarter of the championships to focus
> on a van hidden by a tree?
    
    This was *real* weak.  As the Boston Globe described it, NBC
    nonetheless came out of the whole affair as the big winner because 
    they got to show some basketball game, the more compelling parts of 
    the OJ drama, and a whole bunch of commercials in between.  In the 
    interests of hard "journalism", the other networks didn't have this
    luxury.
    
    I guess Al Michaels got knocked around pretty good for some heavy OJ
    apologism in his interviews on Saturday, in spite of his performance 
    on Friday night.  I find it hard to believe that he could have outdone 
    Will McDonough, though, who yesterday made a very damning insinuation 
    that (as OJ had personally told him) there are two sides to this 
    continued history of wife abuse, but then refused to elaborate, just 
    leaving the matter hanging.  Again, more high-caliber journalism at 
    work...
    
    glenn
    
9.1892CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsMon Jun 20 1994 16:3932
>    that (as OJ had personally told him) there are two sides to this 
>    continued history of wife abuse, but then refused to elaborate, just 

Well, I can't speak to the OJ incident, but I have some friends who work
in this area as social workers or counselors or whatever you want to call
them.

There usually are two sides to a story, and while there ARE a lot (most
perhaps) cases where it's just a case of a guy who thinks it's okay to
beat up on a woman (with the classic line "Don't make me hit you"), there
are cases of woman instigating it and hitting first or precipitating the
incident.  

I know it's probably not politically correct to mention that these days,
because on the PC scale men (all men) are pretty far down at the
bottom of the food chain, but it is true.

Perhaps that is what Will was referring to in his interview, which
I haven't seen.



And hey, let's not forget the fact that America has always had this
perverse little love affair with the criminal, the "underdog" as it were,
the bad boy, that you want to see escape the web.   Bonnie and Clyde,
Dillinger, the James Gang....  I mean, there's  always been a fascination
and a "rooting for" the bad guys in our society....


'Saw


9.1893DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Jun 20 1994 16:4810
    	What bothers me about this whole thing (beyond the obvious)
    	is that the LAPD had OJ and let him go. Now, if it had been
    	any normal human, LAPD would have had them in a cell faster
    	than a New York minute.
    
    	If OJ had killed himself (and/or someone else), I would expect
    	a huge hue and cry about the way the LAPD folks handled this
    	fiasco.
    
    	Scott
9.1894Burn down his house & hit him 50 times - then charge Andre!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Jun 20 1994 16:499
    re: two sides to a story ....
    
    Shortly after Andre Rison's house got burned down buy his "girl friend"
    (some friend) she laid claim that Andre had "beaten" her.  When axed
    about this Andre, in a moment of dispirited candor, said that yes, he
    did slap her once - after she'd slapped him "about 50 times".  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.1895Way Cool\AD::HEATHIndians in '94Mon Jun 20 1994 16:5411
    
    
    
      re about the James Gang....
    
    
    
    Saw what does Rock and Roll have anything to do with the rest of those
    criminals. :*)
    
    Jerry
9.1896HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Mon Jun 20 1994 16:553
    I was watching the procedeedings sans sounds at Matthews.  Most of
    the sports bar was looking for the game and got sucked in.  I wound
    up watching most of the time with Terri, Ms. Southern California '93.
9.1897NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Mon Jun 20 1994 16:598
    All of those anecdotes are well and good, boys, but my problem with
    McDonough's article was not that he raised the insinuation but that he
    didn't have the guts to fill in the blanks.  He just wafted it out
    there for the public imagination to run wild with...
    
    glenn
     
9.1898DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameMon Jun 20 1994 17:035
    	I figure McDonough's article was no worse than some "expert"
    psychologist telling us that O.J.'s farewell letter exhibited all the
    classic signs of a wife beater.
    
    				  /Don
9.1899NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Mon Jun 20 1994 17:0814
    
>    I figure McDonough's article was no worse than some "expert"
>    psychologist telling us that O.J.'s farewell letter exhibited all the
>    classic signs of a wife beater.
    
    No worse, and no better.  All of the armchair psychoanalysis is
    sickening.  But it's still a fact that O.J. is a convicted wife
    abuser, and all of the rationalization in the world doesn't change 
    that.  Considering the criminal record and the ultimate result, I find
    it pretty hard to swallow that there could be some kind of sufficient
    mitigating explanation for it all... 
    
    glenn
    
9.1900CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Jun 20 1994 17:094
    I thought Mike Barnicle's column was quite good (and I'm no big fan of
    his).
    
    Mark.
9.1901PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Jun 20 1994 17:1414
  I also wasn't too happy about the fact that the LAPD didn't take precautions
  for an escape. But this is the same LA justice system which brought 
  us the first Rodney King verdict, a police chief who pretended there was no 
  police brutality, the Reginal Denny verdict and the Menedez verdict.
  This is a city where justice has been turned upside down and inside out.
  Now we're faced with another high profile trial and a media feeding
  frenzy.

  I really hope this doesn't go to trial. If the Juice is guilty, I hope he
  does the right thing and says so. LA and the whole country does not
  need another high profile agonizing trial where the only ones who make
  out are the lawyers and the media sharks.

	Keith
9.1902FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaMon Jun 20 1994 17:159
    I pretty much agree with what's been said.  The media is disgusting,
    regardless of his guilt or innocence.  
    
    Spousal abuse is pretty much irrelevant here since they divorced in
    1991.  The only way it could possibly play a part depends on what plan the
    defense has (probably temporary insanity).
    
    It was truly sad to see, and I still hope he's innocent, but I severely
    doubt it.
9.1903DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameMon Jun 20 1994 17:166
9.1904MKFSA::LONGand the thunder roooooooolllls....Mon Jun 20 1994 17:3820
	I found the whole fiasco Friday night disgusting!  I was at a 
	graduation party and happened into the living room where everyone 
	was entranced by the TV.  All I saw was this white Ford Bronco 
	going down the road, followed by a line of black&whites.

	I asked the closest person what the parade was for.  He said it
	was the LAPD 'escorting' OJ home.  I was then told it had been 
	going on for quite some time.

	I was appauled that the American news media would waste airtime
	on this crap.  I was even further appauled that people I knew
	would stand there staring at this for over an hour.  Maybe I'm 
	in the minority, but I don't care.  This is pure crap and anyone
	who finds this mildly entertaining, enough to watch it, needs to
	do a serious self exam of their idea of what they find newsworthy.


	I feel much better now,

	billl
9.1905there are 2 sides to every storyFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaMon Jun 20 1994 17:449
    Did I mention that Al Michaels went to ASU?
    
    Something VERY interesting that everyone seems to be ignoring:
    
    Yesterday's paper stated that the States' primary witness is pleading
    the 5th Amendment unless he/she's granted immunity.  
    
    This sort of confirms the rumors last week about a 2nd suspect and
    certainly thickens the plot.
9.1906Entertainment? hardly...VAOP28::RiceIt can't happen hereMon Jun 20 1994 17:5210
  >     I was appauled that the American news media would waste airtime
  >     on this crap.  I was even further appauled that people I knew
  >     would stand there staring at this for over an hour.  Maybe I'm 

The second point is what puzzles me. The media will play anything that
sells, pure and simple. They have negative ethics (like the Knicks;).
But why does this sell?!?!?!? The American public is *supporting* this
coverage, big time, or they wouldn't be televising the arraignment.

josh
9.1907HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Mon Jun 20 1994 18:065
    Made for tv movie mentality for you... And tell me if this was made
    for one and the cop says "He went in, called his mom, went to the
    rest room and drank some ORANGE JUICE" you'd think that was the greatest
    twist in cinema and worthy of an Emmy...
    
9.1908It was very ridiculous...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Jun 20 1994 18:1328
    I could not BELEIVE they interupted the game to watch a bronco driving
    down the Highway, I spent most of the time Channel Surfing for anything
    to watch, About 30 seconds into the Bronco Chase you knew everything
    and they should have switched back to the game...
    
    CHASE, MANHUNT, What chase, what manhunt, did I miss something, he
    never left the city and the chase was at a whopping 30-45mph... ???
    
    And isnt LA a High Crime Rate city ??? Whey do they need 30 Cars and
    3-5 HeliCoptors to catch one ACCUSED Criminal driving at 40MPH ??? Id
    hate to know how many other crimes occured during that same time frame
    when who knows how many police personal were wasted on this.. If 2 Cars
    couldnt have followed him and kept up at 45MPH they need to retrain
    them all...????
    
    I couldnt beleive all the hoopla.. Poeple sorrounded his house for HRS
    just waiting, I think people in here are right the Media and the people
    all waiting around outside were proberbly there to witness his suicide
    WHAT A COUNTRY... Id love to say Only in LA but Ive seen the same thing
    at car accidents and House fire's people all blocking the
    roads/sidewalks trying to get a glimps of someone else's misfortune ?
    
    2 people died, one may have been a complete innocent bystander and of
    course neither deserved it...  OJ will try to plead Insanity, or plea
    barging down the charges to not get juiced.... Or well have a 2 year
    trial and 4 made for TV movies (ABC, NBC, CBS and now FOX)...!!!!
    
    								MaB
9.1909bank on itFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaMon Jun 20 1994 18:193
    Re: Brooks
    
    If it comes to that, OJ simply will not get capital punishment.  
9.1910HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Mon Jun 20 1994 18:193
    Then we can start picking out roles... Levar Burton... Bernie Casey,
    Kim Basinger (just finished watching "The Natural" again...) the Federal 
    Express guy or Jon Lovitz as the police chief.   
9.1911HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Mon Jun 20 1994 18:202
    Any update on the arraignment?
    
9.1912hasn't happened yetFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaMon Jun 20 1994 18:221
    Not for another 10 minutes.
9.1913CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsMon Jun 20 1994 18:3937
re the chase:

	If you knew anything at all about police work, you'd have realized
	that what was happening was that most of the cars (save for the
	half-dozen that started trailing him) had been closing down
	exit ramps and then rejoining after the "parade" passed by.

	Why so many?  Why couldn't two have handled it?  

	Well, let's see.  Perhaps the police didn't know that OJ was
	going home.  He might have said he was, but they didn't know
	that.    What else...hmmm, they could have possibly made a
	break for it.  Two cars don't handle that, not the way they
	do it in California.

	Two cars?  Suppose OJ makes Al stop the Bronco, jumps out and is
	starts waving the gun around, or starts shooting bystanders, or
	even Al himself?   


	Bottom line, LA is understaffed with police anyway, so even
	if they called OJ on his cellular phone and said "Okay, Juice,
	we're giving you the benefit of the doubt, we'll meet you at
	your house, and oh, btw, could you stop and pick us up some
	chicken wings on the way", crimes still would have been
	committed.

	But, bottom line, OJ had an arrest warrant for a double murder
	charge.  Probably the only thing that will get a PD more 
	mobilized would have been if OJ was accused of killing a cop.
	That simple.    The police HAVE to make the assumption, based
	on the charges, that he may have killed, and may kill again,
	therefore, all pressure available is brought to bear.


Just a few tidbits to help your understanding,
'Saw
9.1914A circus, yes. High quality entertainment? Definitely.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Jun 20 1994 19:0611
    Say what you will about the absurdity of it all, but there can be no
    doubt that the OJ chase was big-time high drama.  We're talkin' 'bout
    one of the greatest American athletes EVER caught up in the midst of an
    almost unbelievable murder investigation who *escapes* and is being
    tracked down on live TV!
    
    The thought of someone being more interested in the Knicks/Rockets
    fiasco boggles my mind.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.1915Definate OverkillMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Jun 20 1994 19:075
    They Had a few Helicoptors in pursuit as well, I just think it was
    too over hyped, too many cops, too much media, too many bystanders.
    They should have cleared out the whole area, and most of the media.
    
    								MaB
9.1916not guiltyFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaMon Jun 20 1994 19:1012
    OJ pleaded NOT GUILTY.  He looked very somber and like he had't slept
    since Friday - basically looked like hell.  More conferences should be
    expected later by both the prosecution and defense.
    
    BTW - Shapiro was pretty sharp and kept the prosecutor on the run
    during the whole time.  For instance, he stated how disappointed he was
    in the police report for only being 25 pages long.  The state's excuse
    was that things happened so fast that they're still compiling it.  It
    was pretty much like this in several areas, all of which Shapiro
    highlighted.
    
    Mike
9.1917yawnVAOP28::RiceIt can't happen hereMon Jun 20 1994 19:197
> Big-time high drama.

Really? Like I said, I must be too long gone from
the States, cuz I don't get it. It's a modern tragedy
and all, but live TV? Wow. I'd rather watch curling.

josh
9.1918In the year 2020 we'll ask "Where were you win OJ ran?"RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Jun 20 1994 19:3410
    > I'd rather watch curling.
    
    Yea, that's why all three (3) networks, plus CNN, plus Headline NEWS,
    plus ESPN, .... all joined in on the live coverage.  
    
    This story might not have played outside the U.S., but here in "the
    States" it was about as big as it gets.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.1919CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsMon Jun 20 1994 20:1318
>
>    They Had a few Helicoptors in pursuit as well, I just think it was
>    too over hyped, too many cops, too much media, too many bystanders.
>    They should have cleared out the whole area, and most of the media.
>    

Most of the helicopters were media.

The ones doing the over hyping were the media, I'll give you that.

But let me ask you this -- there's a fugitive from justice loose in your
neighborhood, which puts you, your wife, and your kids at peril.  How
many cops is too many?


'Saw


9.1920HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Mon Jun 20 1994 20:142
    Should OJ get his own topic at this point?
    
9.1921From the Mickster....CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsMon Jun 20 1994 20:2135
>
>    Should OJ get his own topic at this point?
>    


Nah, there's not that much other football going on.


From MIke Leary:


	a) Orange Juice?  Orange Juice?  Hell, they should call him
	   tomato juice based on all the blood he left behind.

	b) Bet he wishes he was Irish now, he'd have been so drunk
	   that he couldn't have beaten anyone up, let alone kill 'em

	c) St. Patrick got him back.


	On a SERIOUS note from Mike:

		He feels sad about the Juice and the whole tragedy
		with the kids and everything, and wanted to express
		that here in notes...


'Saw


PS  He told me he was really at Yellowstone last week -- really, he said
    he was.....8^)

PPS  He said if anyone dislikes his comments, they can call him 
     at 617-662-2639
9.1922MKFSA::LONGand the thunder roooooooolllls....Mon Jun 20 1994 20:418
>>    This story might not have played outside the U.S., but here in "the
>>    States" it was about as big as it gets.


	This, my friend, is the absurdity of it all.


	billl
9.1923CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Mon Jun 20 1994 21:0122
    No offense guys, but you sound Digital Marketing folks.  ;-)

    EVERYONE, (including myself) that I knew, be they at work or at home,
    was glued to their sets watching the Bronco roll down the highway.

    Any station not smart enough to have picked that up ain't a sound
    business.

    The fact is, most of us are to blame for the fact that the media hyped
    it up.  I'll bet if one station carried the event, it would have killed
    (including the ball game) everyone else for ratings.  We all tuned in,
    we all stayed up until mid-night waiting to see if O.J. was going to
    blow his brains out, or get shot by a cop.  (Not that anyone WANTED to
    see that, I certainly agonized, as I really like the teevee persona
    that we knew as O.J. Simpson)

    We watched intently, and then blame the media for bringing it to us.

    I wanted to cry for the Simpson kids.  What a terrible week for a
    child...

    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.1924HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Mon Jun 20 1994 21:092
    Assuming no bail allowed?  Any trial date set?
    
9.1925VAOP28::RiceIt can't happen hereMon Jun 20 1994 21:1111
   > EVERYONE, (including myself) that I knew, be they at work or at home,
   > was glued to their sets watching the Bronco roll down the highway.

I must admit that is fascinating. No one here watched it - people turned
off their sets. And we're 20 minutes from the border, and we all know OJ.
It was *disgusting* to watch the feeding frenzy over a man's personal
tragedy. The frenzy over MJackson's sex life is trivial in comparison.

The saddest part is that, once again, the kids pay the highest price.

josh
9.1926FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaMon Jun 20 1994 21:111
    There's another hearing on Wednesday.
9.1927Humankind has *always* had a fascination for this kinda thingRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Jun 20 1994 21:229
    I don't see our fascination with watching the OJ saga play out any
    different than, say, a big crowd on hand in France a few hundred years
    ago to watch somebody get the guillotine.
    
    Course the OJ drama was better cause nobody knew how it was gonna turn
    out.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.1928The Murder Trial of O.J. SimpsonHELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 21 1994 07:4721
  Yesterday, Hall of Fame football star O.J. Simpson was arraigned in Los
Angles Municipal Court on two counts of murder in the 1st degree with special
circumstances for the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Deputy
District Attorney Marcia Clark will represent the people of California and
Attorney Robert Shapiro will represent the Juice. Clark was assigned to the
case by L.A. County District Attorney Gil Garcetti. 

  At the arrangement, O.J. Simpson was officially informed of the charges
against him and asked if he understood the charges. He replied that he did
understand the charges and entered a plea of Not Guilty. 

  Robert Shapiro then filed a formal motion for Discovery by which all evidence
collected by the state will be made available to the defense. Marcia Clark had
no objection to making the evidence available but requested that state
procedures be followed so as not to damage the evidence. A compliance hearing
was scheduled for Wed June 21 to discuss the discovery motion. 

  Shapiro also requested a Preliminary Hearing which was scheduled for June
30th. 

  George 
9.1929HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 21 1994 07:5136
RE     <<< Note 9.1924 by HANNAH::ASHE "Movin' on up, to the east side..." >>>

>    Assuming no bail allowed?  
    
  There is no bail. O.J. has been charged with 2 counts of 1st degree murder
with "special circumstances". Under California law, that means that there is
no bail allowed and he is eligible for the death penalty. It's the same charge
that is pending against the Menendez brothers.

  L.A. District Attorney Gil Garcetti. has said that they will wait until after
the indictment to decide if they will ask for the death penalty. At that time
they will be able to review the testimony of witnesses who testify before the
grand jury. 

  If the D.A. asks for the death penalty then under California Law the jury
will be asked to decide several things. First they have to decide if the
killing was a Homicide. If it was, they have to decide if it was 1st degree
murder or some lesser crime (2nd degree or manslaughter). If they decide it was
1st degree then they have to decide if there were "special circumstances".

  If they convict O.J of 1st degree Murder with special circumstances, then
there would be a 2nd trial before that same jury to decide if he should receive
the death penalty or life without parole.

>Any trial date set?

  Most likely they will have O.J. wave his 6th amendment right to a speedy
trial so that they can have time to prepare his defense. If it follows the
normal schedule, he should come to trial some time between spring and late
summer of '95. If his attorney decides to conduct a more complicated defense it
could take longer. 

  In any case, unless he pleads out, gets exonerated, or dies, the various
legal maneuvering should go on for at least 15 years.

  George 
9.1930MKFSA::LONGand the thunder roooooooolllls....Tue Jun 21 1994 12:584
	Thank you, Doug Lewellen!


	billl
9.1931CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 13:042
Boy, like I didn't already know all that from the news that's been on
all over the place.....
9.1932HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Tue Jun 21 1994 13:337
    I guess his housekeeper is the witness that won't testify without
    immunity.... that according to "A Current Affair" lasted night.
    Also, I guess OJ had planned to go to his wife's grave site and
    pull the trigger before AC talked him out of it.  That according
    to "A Current Affair" too...  Did you know Ronald Goldman was on
    "Studs" once?
    
9.1933MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Tue Jun 21 1994 14:034
    A Current Affair?  Studs?  Better snap out of it before you
    start quoting prices on the Home Shopping Channel.
    
    Mike
9.1934CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Jun 21 1994 14:097
    One could see how watching a beautiful ex-wife who broke up your first
    marriage, spends all your dough, while letting a young guy who was
    on "Studs" drive his Lambourginni after boinking her, could irritate 
    a guy.

    (Not that I am suggesting that justifies murder, mind you, but it
    *might* be the cause of a good arse kicking that got outta hand...)
9.1935HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 21 1994 14:1831
RE football

  New York is on a roll. They made the finals in Hockey and Basketball and the
Yankees look like they are making a run at the A.L. Pennant. If the Bronks
Bombers do make the fall classic, what are the chances that New York can make
it a grand slam and get one of their football teams into the Superbowl? 

  Since both teams play in New Jersey, will the New York fans consider them
New York teams if one of them makes it?

RE O.J.

  Right now O.J. is charged with 2 counts of 1st degree Murder. Even if they
can prove the charge against his wife I think they might have a hard time with
the 2nd count, the one against Goldman.

  In California, 2nd degree murder is defined as a homicide committed with
malice aforethought without premeditation. Since Goldman was sent to the house
by the restaurant to return a pair of glasses, it's going to be hard for the
state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that O.J. knew he was going to be
there so it will be hard for them to prove premeditation on that count. 

  The "special circumstances" depend on the state proving that there was a
double murder but I don't think it's clear whether or not they need two
1st degree murders or if one 1st and one 2nd will suffice.

  The murder charges each carry a maximum sentence of 25 to life. Without
the "special circumstances" charge they don't have the death penalty and
they might not have life without parole.

  George
9.1936CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 14:2010
>  Since both teams play in New Jersey, will the New York fans consider them
>New York teams if one of them makes it?

New York fans have always considered the Giant and the Jets to be New York
teams.

However, the chances of the Giants or Jets winning the Bowl this year
are pretty slim....


9.1938HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 21 1994 14:3115
  Considering that there are now 3 wild cards in each conference, any chance of
either team making the playoffs? In football, if a team can squeak into one of
those wild card slots they can go quite far. A good example would be the
Patriots who won a couple upsets to get to the Superbowl.

  It's weird, I normally hate New York teams living in Boston but now I find
myself pulling for them to repeat in basketball, "three-peat" in baseball,
and go for the Grand Slam in football.

  GO NEW YORK!!!

  Good grief, what am I saying?

  :*)}
  George
9.1939CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 14:4214
Yeah, but I think there's only been one WC in history that won the Bowl.

I don't know about the Jets, but the Giants could make the playoffs.  Maybe.

Most Giant fans I know are not optimistic about this year's team.  They've
lost too many good lineman, they're suspect at QB now with two young
QBs who ain't that good.  George Young has his head up his ample wazoo,
Dan Reeves has no 'nads, and I'm predicting like an 8-8 season.

They made the 'offs last year at 11-5 and were spanked by the Niners.  If they
make the 'offs again this year look for the same thing....


'Saw
9.1940MSE1::FRANCUSNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsTue Jun 21 1994 14:436
    One of the NY teams might make the playoffs but I just
    don't see either of them , Jets or Giants, even making it to
    the Super Bowl.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1941CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 14:4913
>    
>    The Crazy Met
>    

You're a Jets fan, right TCM?  

I mean, I have hard time seeing the Giants making the 'offs, personally.
But if they do, I agree with you.....


'Saw

9.1942SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Tue Jun 21 1994 16:115
    
    You guys are all forgetting the only team that PLAYS in New York. The
    Bills could make it to the bowl again and actually win.
    
    Ron
9.1943DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameTue Jun 21 1994 16:224
    	O.J. has a better chance of getting an award from N.O.W. than
    the Bills do of *winning* a Super Bowl...
    
    				  /Don
9.1944Strike while it's hot..HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Tue Jun 21 1994 16:385
    They should the "Studs" clip on "A Current Affair".  I was waiting
    for a commercial to end on either Letterman or Baseball Tonight...
    besides, my roommates are from Buffalo... he found his Al Cowlings
    rookie card through his collection over the weekend...
    
9.1945FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaTue Jun 21 1994 16:4621
    OJ will get off with manslaughter.  Bank on it.  Like stated by our
    Figure Skating Analyst, this trial will be very complicated and drawn out 
    over a year.
    
    It's pretty eerie to see when Goldman was on STUDS, especially since
    Nicole was with him then too.  What was eerie is his response when
    asked if that was OJ's wife he was with.
    
    Interesting info about the housekeeper, I hadn't heard that.  What does
    she need immunity from?  I noticed the "Paula - you're special" from
    the letter was identified as model Paula Barbieri.
    
    From the common sense school:
    
    Nicole received $38K in alimony per month and $14K in child support per
    month.  OJ bought her the $90K Ferrari and also her $700K condo. 
    Yet she was so worried about a $50 pair of sunglasses left at the
    restaurant.  Doesn't take much to figure out that Goldman was in OJ's
    way of reconciling with Nicole.
    
    Mike
9.1946HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 21 1994 17:4014
  There have been several reports that O.J. collectibles have increased
dramatically in price. On the radio this morning I heard a dealer say that
another dealer was trying to sell him a football autographed by the Juice for
$499. It had been around $100 last week. 

  Another dealer said he hadn't sold an O.J. card in months but now they are
going as fast as he can find them.

  I wonder if there will be a new set with a white Bronco card. Or perhaps
one for each lawyer involved.

  Oops, the macabre humor creeps in ...

  George
9.1947DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameTue Jun 21 1994 17:405
    	From what I saw of the show STUDS, and admittedly is wasn't
    much, anybody with an IQ of over 75 was disqualified from being
    a contestant.
    
    				  /Don
9.1948What % of teams make it in baseball nowMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Jun 21 1994 19:0311
    For both NY teams to make the playoffs in football would be a HUGE
    feat (Or all 3 for that matter).  Even with the 3 WC teasm only 20%
    of the teams in the NFL make the playoffs.  I dont what the exact
    % is now in hockey (With expansion) but it use to be 72% and the NBA
    is like 62% and who know what it is in baseball... but if the new
    Baseball format has 20% making the playoffs Football could be the
    NEW Toughest sport to make the playoffs...
    
    TIME to go to a 8 Divisions with 16 teams making the offs :-)
    
    								MaB
9.1949Won't post them in this forum...ROCK::MURPHYGood News for Mets - Can't finish 7th!Tue Jun 21 1994 19:114
    Anyone wanting the Complete Box Set of OJ jokes can e-mail me.
    
    Murph
    
9.1950CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 19:197
>                     -< Won't post them in this forum... >-
>
>    Anyone wanting the Complete Box Set of OJ jokes can e-mail me.
    

Aw c'mon, take a stab at it.....    

9.1951SOLANA::MAY_BRYankees are an embarassment-GeorgeKTue Jun 21 1994 19:202
    
    Mac is really gone, huh?
9.1952CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsTue Jun 21 1994 19:2716
>    Mac is really gone, huh?


Yes, Mac has been gone for several weeks now.


re the OJ joke list.

	Actually, it's a good idea NOT to post it, simply because it
	has come off the internet, and the internet is a wild, no-rules
	kind of place, and the list contains at least one joke that
	I know would be found offensive in the protected little
	"valuing differences" world of DEC....


'Saw
9.1953a clean oneFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaTue Jun 21 1994 20:022
    If it took OJ 4 hours to drive down the Santa Ana Freeway, how long
    would it take Jim Brown and Walter Payton?
9.1954fyi - police tapes are being releasedFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaTue Jun 21 1994 21:2220
    KGME had a major news scoop today.  They played the tape of OJ speaking
    to the cops while in the Bronco after AC brought him a new cell phone
    from the police.
    
    The police spokesperson was encouraging OJ by telling him about the
    concern for him from his family, mother, children, and all the fans
    around the property.  He's trying to get him to come out of the vehicle
    and come in the house.  OJ responds with "Let me get to Nicole,
    please."  The negotiator tries to blow it off and says he doesn't want
    anyone else hurt.  OJ responds again, "I know they think I'm a fugitive 
    and a murderer and I'm going to go to jail."  He reminds OJ of his 
    responsibility to his Momma and continues to encourage him to come into
    the house.  OJ keeps responding, "I'll try.  I'll try."  They leave the
    cell phones on, the cop comes to the door to greet him and OJ exits the
    truck.
    
    OJ's voice sounds like he hasn't slept in days, is totally confused, or
    is on something.  He sounds very disjointed.
    
    Mike
9.1955CSC32::GAULKETue Jun 21 1994 21:278
    
    
     >> He sounds very disjointed.
    
    
     Maybe he had a bad day at the office. 
    
      
9.1956HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Tue Jun 21 1994 21:286
    they release the tapes and yet say they don't want a media circus...
    incredible..
    
    OJ was under heavy sedation, doesn't surprise me if he sounds half
    sleep...
    
9.1957CorrectionOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Tue Jun 21 1994 21:484
9.1958MSE1::FRANCUSNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsWed Jun 22 1994 00:025
    30 teams? NFL only has 28 at the moment. When do Charlotte and
    Jacksonville join? 1994 or 1995??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.1959HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jun 22 1994 14:2229
  Court TV covered the "secret" grand jury hearing and had reports on things
leaked by a juror to the press. The evidence seems to include a house keeper
who said O.J. was not home waiting for the limo and some new blood tests. 

  What amazed the Court TV reporters was the amount of information that is
being leaked by the prosecution and other officials. It is clearly an organized
attempt to sway public opinion. As one Court TV reporter said, the prosecution
is already making it's opening statement to the jury pool. 

  Meanwhile, the defense is not exactly cooling it's heals. They have caught on
and are responding to the charges as they come out calling the blood test
flawed and inconclusive and reaffirming O.J.'s claim of innocence. 

  Also, an all-star defense team is being assembled to defend the Juice. Robert
Shapiro has contacted his old DWI client F. Lee Bailey who now seems to be
involved in the case on a consultant basis. He is also talking to other top
defense attorneys around the country. 

  Under California law, a defendant is entitled to at least 2 attorneys in a
capital case and Shapiro has said that there will probably be at least 3
working on the case full time. Shapiro claims that he will stay on as lead
attorney although he is best known for making deals, not going to trial.

  When it was obvious that his last famous client, Eric Menendez, was going to
trial, he stepped aside for trial lawyer Leslie Abramson who is considered the
top capital defense attorney in California and who masterminded the Menendez
defense.

  George
9.1960FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 22 1994 16:565
    Local news said this morning that the police report is no big
    revelation.  The "evidence" they have is pretty much everything we've
    already heard.  It seems it will really hang on the DNA test, and even
    that can be questioned if not done properly.  If it's done right,
    proving it wrong faces 1,000,000:1 odds.
9.1961CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 22 1994 16:5918
While this is in the realm of totally unsubstantiated rumor, I heard this
morning that she was almost decapitated in the attack, and that Goldman
was cut from the tailbone almost to the neck.

One thing that comes to mind when hearing that is that it's a military,
commando style of killing.  Especially Goldman's wounds...they would be
very difficult for an ordinary individual to make, no matter how strong.
(At least that's what some of my special forces friends have said).


If that is the case, then perhaps there WAS an accomplice, or another
suspect or whatever.


Again, this is all just RAW speculation......


'Saw
9.1962what's been confirmed so far - cops say attacker was VERY angryFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 22 1994 17:3217
    The wounds have been confirmed and are not speculation.  The weapon is
    a 15" *serrated* knife.  Nicole's neck was sliced down to the backbone
    (top vertebrae).  Her wounds were "clean" so she didn't put up much of
    a struggle.
    
    I haven't heard anything about Goldman's wound the length of his back,
    but they said his wounds weren't "clean."  There were lots of tears so
    this translates to quite a struggle.  
    
    Both victims were knifed to the back of the head first.  Goldman was the 
    first victim.  Nicole had 12 wounds around her upper body.  
    
    One thing you can say is that wounds like this create LOTS of blood
    loss and there's no way the attacker wouldn't get any on him.  The
    crime scene is evidence of the blood loss - lots of it.
    
    Mike
9.1963mask doesn't existFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 22 1994 17:425
    Shapiro just publicly called out Marcia Clark on the carpet during the
    hearing.  He initiated it by claiming he didn't have all the evidence
    and wanted the rest of it.  Clark said Shapiro has everything the
    police do.  Shapiro counters with questions regarding the mask.  After
    some hemming and hawing, Clark admits that there is no mask.
9.1964CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 22 1994 17:4812
>
>    Shapiro just publicly called out Marcia Clark on the carpet during the
>    hearing.  He initiated it by claiming he didn't have all the evidence
>    and wanted the rest of it.  Clark said Shapiro has everything the
>    police do.  Shapiro counters with questions regarding the mask.  After
>    some hemming and hawing, Clark admits that there is no mask.
>


Well, I'll make a prediction.  This fight is gonna be far better than
Duran-Pazienza --- and it's all for free too.....

9.1965FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 22 1994 18:018
    My observation of Shapiro so far is that the guy is brilliant, and his
    supporting cast is shaping up the same way.  The more I see from this
    guy, the more I think OJ's got a chance to beat this.  Like I've said
    before, it's not a matter of guilt, it's a matter of whose lawyer is
    the best.
    
    Some of the locals so far have likened the prosecution's performance
    thus far to the Broncos in the Super Bowl.
9.1966::SOAPBOX might be more appropriateMKFSA::LONGand the thunder roooooooolllls....Wed Jun 22 1994 18:065
	I thought there was a note created for this tripe.  Heaven forbid
	someone might want to enter something related to the NFL in here.


	billl
9.1967CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 22 1994 18:2321
>
>	I thought there was a note created for this tripe.  Heaven forbid
>	someone might want to enter something related to the NFL in here.
>

Nope, I moved it here.

There's nothing going on in the NFL right now, and it's easier for me
to keep track of all of the stuff in one place.


Shapiro is a smart guy.   The prosecution is just concerned with getting
re-elected.  I have to laugh when they get up on their soapbox about
spousal abuse (which is a legit problem, no doubt, but Garcetti seems
to be campaigning already).

Of course I might be wrong in assuming that Garcetti's position is
politically appointed like it is in a lot of places......


'Saw
9.1968FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 22 1994 18:251
    The DA is an elected position in LA.
9.1969HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Wed Jun 22 1994 18:273
    So who plays the waiter?  Rob Lowe or in his first actign role, Tony
    Meola?
    
9.1970CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 22 1994 18:2712
>
>    The DA is an elected position in LA.
>

Then Garcetti must have wood all the time these days.  He couldn't have
been more blatant during the news conference last week, and even one of
my buds who's not very quick on the uptake noticed the blatant stumping
that Garcetti was doing.....


'Saw

9.1971CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 22 1994 18:2810
>    So who plays the waiter?  Rob Lowe or in his first actign role, Tony
>    Meola?
    
Someone who swishes just a bit more.  Bronson Pinchot using just a little
of the flair he used for Serge(?) in Beverly Hills Cop.....


'Saw


9.1972CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 22 1994 18:292
Tony Meola gets the bit part as the Police Commander who has to announce
that OJ is now running.....
9.1973CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunWed Jun 22 1994 19:455
wouldn't the waiter part go to William Baldwin? He just won MTV's most
desirable male at their awards..........


9.1974damn, I just missed againFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 22 1994 19:511
    
9.1976CSC32::GAULKEWed Jun 22 1994 20:125
    
    
     200 year anniversary.
    
    
9.1977FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 22 1994 20:151
    well it's an honor just to get nominated.
9.1978back to nflBSS::MENDEZWed Jun 22 1994 23:055
    Don't mean to change the subject but I have a NFl question.  Did the
    49ers sign Richard Dent?  I thought I read that somewhere....
    
    Frank
    
9.1979MKFSA::LONGand the thunder roooooooolllls....Thu Jun 23 1994 12:1814
>>    Don't mean to change the subject but I have a NFl question.  Did the
>>    49ers sign Richard Dent?  I thought I read that somewhere....
    
	Sheesh, Frank, that was pretty slick there sneaking that NFL
	related reply into here.  

	To answer your question, I had not heard anything about the 
	49ers signing Dent.

	It's probably somewhere in the New York Rangers note.



	billl
9.1980CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu Jun 23 1994 13:135
|>>    Don't mean to change the subject but I have a NFl question.  Did the
|>>    49ers sign Richard Dent?  I thought I read that somewhere....

Pretty sure I heard that they reached an agreement, and the signign was 
immenant.
9.1981CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Thu Jun 23 1994 15:556
    According the my last Bear_Report Dent was signed.  (For less money
    than he wa offered by Da'Bears)
    
    Sounds like his agent really over guessed Ricards value...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.1982Dent is a good additionBSS::MENDEZThu Jun 23 1994 17:596
    Well being a 9er fan I was hoping the 9ers signed Dent.  He can only
    help their defensive line.  He is still a good pass rusher.  How old
    is Dent?
    
    Frank
    
9.1983CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsThu Jun 23 1994 18:291
I think Dent is early 30s, but I could be wrong....
9.1984CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu Jun 23 1994 19:073
|I think Dent is early 30s, but I could be wrong....

That sounds about right.  That is downright ancient for a lineman...
9.1986SOLANA::MAY_BRYankees are an embarassment-GeorgeKThu Jun 23 1994 20:254
    
    Makes sense.  Cook is a local boy who played at Stanford.  
    
    brews
9.1987NYOSS1::BACHA New York node?Thu Jun 23 1994 20:3911
    Dent played great last year, like a man giving everything he has 
    to give for the promise of his impending free agency.
    
    The fact he was going FA may have been what put him on top.  He was
    drafted in the 8th round of the 1982 (mebbe '83) draft, he will have
    posted 12 years as a pro, including super bowl XX MVP.
    
    I hope he plays well, but losing him wasn't high on my list of guys
    to keep.  (Especially for what he wanted to be paid 4M/2years)
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.1989CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Fri Jun 24 1994 14:5414
re: .1988

I find it particularly distasteful the way the LA County DA, and Police are 
playing this thing.  It is abundantly clear that Gil Garcetti has high political
aspirations, and is siezing the moment to launch them.

It also troubles me that, since this case has gotten so much publicity, the case
against OJ needs to totally air-tight.  I'm no lawyer (not do I play one in a 
notes file), but is seems to me that if OJ were a regular guy, he wouldn't
stand a chance in court.  

Too bad justice and determinng if he is guilty isn't the thing here.

=Bob=
9.1990Show Biz > JusticePEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jun 24 1994 14:5919
  I agree that they have tried to prosecute this case in the media and I don't
  like it. But, Shapiro and the defense has also been guilty of similar 
  actions. Every chance he gets, he's trying to make everybody feel sorry for 
  poor old OJ. I'll bet one of his next steps is to try to assasinate the 
  reputations of the 2 people who were slaughtered. That's easy to do since 
  they're dead and can't defend themselves. Even with all of the leaks and 
  rumors, I don't think we've heard all the evidence. There's no way that a 
  DA will bring charges against a celebrity/national hero if he didn't have 
  sufficient evidence. Remember, the DA is an elected official and OJ was/is 
  very well liked in Southern California. But then again, maybe the DA is
  dumbed than I thought. 

  I think that the best thing at this time, for the press and everybody else,
  is to sit back and let the Justice system do it's thing. The only thing is,
  the terms "Justice" and "LA" in the same sentence seem to be a contradiction
  in terms considering some recent verdicts. Kind of like a double negative.

	Keith
9.1991exitPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jun 24 1994 15:038
>Where were all
>  of these people in 1989 when OJ was arrested for beating his wife?

  A agree. But I'd like to add something. Where was the judge when he handed
  down the "slap on the wrist" sentence ? Evidently, Nicole was not a pretty 
  sight after he got done mauling her.

	Keith
9.1993METSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsFri Jun 24 1994 15:2415
There have been other trials (ie Rodney King) that everyone assumed
would result in a guilty verdict and did not. From the evidence that
has so far come out about OJ, et.al. a good lawyer (and Shapiro appears
to be one) is very likely going to be able to put "reasonable doubt"
in a juries (or at least some juror(s)) mind(s). The burden of proof
in criminal cases is very much on the prosecution; defense just had to
provide reasonable doubt they do not have to prove innocence since 
the presumption is innocent until proven guilty.

Manslaughter as opposed to 1st or 2nd degree murder, either in a plea
bargain or trial verdict, would not surprise me.

The Crazy Met

9.1994MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jun 24 1994 15:3012
    
    >> Manslaughter as opposed to 1st or 2nd degree murder, either 
    >> in a plea bargain or trial verdict, would not surprise me.

        He may plead down to manslaughter but he won't get it in
        a trial verdict. If the definition in California is the
        same here and manslaughter is causing death by reckless-
        ness the I doubt that slitting two people's throat and 
        stabbing them repeatedly quite qualifies. OJ's got a 
        great lawyer though and right now the odds are against him
        getting murder one.
    
9.1995Must be an election year 8^)CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsFri Jun 24 1994 15:4819
Despit the fact that it's not high quality literature, I can't help be
see paralllels between "A Time To Kill" and what's happening in LA with
OJ.

Not in terms of the case, but in terms of the publicity seeking attornies
who live to be on the evening news.


Gil Garcetti is scarier than Ollie North -- and folks here's a wakeup call,
that is pretty scary.   Mr Crusade Against Violence Against Women is so
fake on that score that he could probably substitute the words
"Legalize Marijuana" if he thought it would get him more votes....

Shapiro is manipulating public sentiment as best he can to help his client,
but is increasing his fame at the same time....


I can't help but wonder if our founding fathers ever thought of little
wrinkles like this when they set it all up....
9.1996CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingFri Jun 24 1994 16:0913
    Great note, Tommy.
    
    Keep in mind that the release of the 911 tapes was forced by the LA
    Media under the Freedom of Infrormation Act.  These weren't volunteered
    over by the DA.
    
    One thing certain in mind is that the DA will not try for the death
    penalty.  The DA wants, make that NEEDS, a conviction more than
    anything else.  Convincing a jury the OJ is guilty will be tough
    enough.  Convincing them to put him to death would be another matter
    all together.
    
    Mark.
9.1997FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaFri Jun 24 1994 16:373
    Considering that region's recent performance in high-profile cases,
    they NEED this one badly.  I only perceive Shapiro playing the media
    game as a counter to what the DA's office is doing.
9.1998DZIGN::ROBICHAUDLike A Moth To A FlameFri Jun 24 1994 16:379
    	Much like in the Reginald Denny beating the DA may have overcharged
    OJ.  Without the bloody ski mask or bloody glove (neither yet exist,
    despite the press "leaks" to the contrary), it's goin to be hard to
    make the murder one charge stick.  If acquitted the femminist hue
    and cry will be heard from Bangor to Baja.  But don't blame the
    system on this one, blame a prosecutor trying to make points instead
    of getting a conviction.
    
    				   /Don  
9.1999DNA Aspect of ItSTRATA::BARBIERIFri Jun 24 1994 16:3921
      Man, I want to believe he's innocent!
    
      I wonder about the DNA testing.  Is it the type of thing that
      it always identifies with incredible statistical confidence
      one way or the other?  In other words, is it possible that if
      the DNA fingerprints OJ, he has no chance and if it does not
      fingerprint OJ, he's basically unconvictable?
    
      Or is it possible that sometimes the testing finds that its too
      hard with some blood samples to make anything out of it?
    
      Besides the DNA thing, one thing blows my mind assuming he did
      it.  I figure to murder someone as hideously as he did, he would
      have to be so drugged out of his mind, but if so that would be
      very evident by people seeing him on his flight.  But, if it wasn't
      drug induced, how can a guy do that?  That is evil to one mighty
      high degree.
    
                                                     Tony
    
                                                    Tony
9.2000say NOOOOOOO to KevMETSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsFri Jun 24 1994 16:403
The Crazy Met

9.2001Pretty basic CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingFri Jun 24 1994 16:446
    I'll wait for the jury verdict, but my gut says he did it.
    
    If someone killed my wife, rather than cruising I-405 with a gun to my
    own head, I'd be out looking for the person that actually did it. 
    
    Mark.
9.2002SHARE::DERRYColor me impressed...Fri Jun 24 1994 16:4614
>    enough.  Convincing them to put him to death would be another matter
>    all together.
 
    Not to jump into a rathole with this *but* ...

    If this weren't OJ Simpson, people would be calling for his head.  Granted
    it wouldn't have the media's drool all over it but if found guilty, he'd
    be gased.  

    The majority of this country is in favor of the death penalty - as long
    as it's committed against some Joe Blow slob and not against someone
    they feel connected to.  And everyone feels that they "know" OJ.

    Nice double standard.
9.2004I can't yet see the basis for some of these early conclusionsNAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Fri Jun 24 1994 16:5430
    >> Manslaughter as opposed to 1st or 2nd degree murder, either 
    >> in a plea bargain or trial verdict, would not surprise me.
    >
    >    He may plead down to manslaughter but he won't get it in
    >    a trial verdict.
    
    If this is the case I would say there would be no chance of a 
    manslaughter charge, then.  I can't see the DA agreeing to such a 
    plea bargain, unless there's some kind of absolutely stunning evidence 
    that we don't yet know about (like that OJ was involved but wasn't 
    the main perpetrator-- and I just don't see that right now).  They're 
    at murder one with special circumstances now, and it's a long way down 
    to manslaughter.  If the evidence is there, the public would rightly be 
    outraged if this didn't go to trial on murder.
    
    > OJ's got a great lawyer though and right now the odds are against him
    > getting murder one.
      
    This seems to be the majority opinion, and in general (not necessarily
    here) a very cynical one.  Regardless of the quality of his lawyer, why
    are the odds so great against murder one?  I understand that anything's
    possible, but it's still very early, and if the experts line up one
    after one in court with overwhelming direct evidence including DNA
    tests and other physical evidence, why should a murder one conviction
    be so improbable?   Having a great lawyer and lots of money is an edge,
    but it's not going to undo mounds of evidence...
    
    glenn
    
9.2005How bad does it have to be?NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Fri Jun 24 1994 16:5911
                 
>    But don't blame the
>    system on this one, blame a prosecutor trying to make points instead
>    of getting a conviction.                    
    
    Well, /Don, assuming that OJ actually did kill these two people, and 
    you believe that he is being overcharged, what exactly do you consider 
    a legitimate murder one charge?!
    
    glenn
     
9.2006"Hard/soft on crime" fast being demonstrated a huge joke...NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Fri Jun 24 1994 17:0513
>    The majority of this country is in favor of the death penalty - as long
>    as it's committed against some Joe Blow slob and not against someone
>    they feel connected to.  And everyone feels that they "know" OJ.
    
    Bingo!  And if some other kind of violent offender (which is exactly
    what Simpson was convicted of, a violent offense) had been treated as
    Simpson was and allowed an early parole or a work release or some other
    such treatment perceived as lenient, the DA would be getting skewered
    from the other end...
    
    glenn
    
9.2007Sounds Like SpenceSTRATA::BARBIERIFri Jun 24 1994 17:158
      re: .2003
    
        I didn't see the shows you referred to Tommy, but the lawyer
        I think must be Richard Spence (sp?).  He is considered one
        of the very best lawyers.  The guy is incredible.  If I was OJ
        and I could have any lawyer, he'd be the guy I'd want.
    
                                                    Tony
9.2008FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaFri Jun 24 1994 17:1611
    Re: DNA
    
    Now they can only question *how* the tests are done.  If done properly,
    they are extremely trustworthy.  They're even opening old unsolved cases 
    and solving them today because of DNA testing.
    
    It's also interesting how everyone is focused on abuse now.  What's
    even more interesting is news reports and statistics stating that men
    experience incidences of abuse (by women) as much as women (by men). 
    Most people tend to focus only on police data, where charges are filed,
    and wrongly believe it's only a "man-thing."
9.2010CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunFri Jun 24 1994 17:305
 I think men experience abuse more. I consider abuse everytime wife says
 NO! I have headache......

 ;^)
9.2011CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Fri Jun 24 1994 17:329
|    The majority of this country is in favor of the death penalty - as long
|    as it's committed against some Joe Blow slob and not against someone
|    they feel connected to.  And everyone feels that they "know" OJ.

I also agree with Karen on this one.  In fact I would fear that invoking the 
death penalty in this case could be the catalyst for a new round of riots in
LA.  Evidence the "supporters" lining the road during the car chase.

=Bob=
9.2012CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingFri Jun 24 1994 17:446
    FWIW, I agree with Karen's point, but that wasn't why I made my point
    about the DA not going for the death penalty.  My point is that the
    state of CA *badly* needs this conviction and doesn't need/want the
    extra pressure (death penalty) put on the jury to convict OJ
    
    Mark.
9.2013MKFSA::LONGand the thunder roooooooolllls....Fri Jun 24 1994 17:5310
	Here's the biggest problem I have with this case (and I think it was 
	what several other have eluded to):

	Had the tables been turned and Joe Blow had hacked up Simpson and
	his lovely ex-wife you would never have all this BS being played
	out in the media.  And no one would blink an eye at giving the
	'perp' the 'juice' (pun intended).


	billl
9.2015"Studies show..." Please...NAC::G_WAUGAMANIndians in '94Fri Jun 24 1994 18:0415
>    It's also interesting how everyone is focused on abuse now.  What's
>    even more interesting is news reports and statistics stating that men
>    experience incidences of abuse (by women) as much as women (by men). 
>    Most people tend to focus only on police data, where charges are filed,
>    and wrongly believe it's only a "man-thing."
    
    And the statistics on the big enchilada, spousal homicide, are what, 
    10 to 1 or higher in favor of men?  Any sensible person can see this.
    If anything merits that ridiculous "PC" label, it's the attempt to 
    pass battery off as an equal opportunity crime in the real world.  
    Let's be serious...
    
    glenn
    
9.2016HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 24 1994 18:0565
RE Could the death penalty scare off the jury, and did overcharging take
  away the chance of manslaughter?

  The answer to both is no. The jury will most likely get to chose between
several different charges. If they don't buy the death penalty or murder 1 then
they will probably have the choice to go for murder 2 or manslaughter. They are
normally given a list from which to pick and under California law could get to
these different verdicts if they believe the following: 

  Murder 1 with special circumstances

    The Jury believed that O.J. premeditated the murder of both of the
    individuals then carried out those murders.

    The Jury believed that O.J. premeditated the murder of one of the two
    individual, carried out that murder (Murder 1), then murdered the other
    individual without premeditation (i.e. Murder 2).

    There are some other "special circumstances" but so far they have not been
    mentioned by the D.A. If they find special circumstances and if the D.A.
    asked for the death penalty then there would be a 2nd trial before the
    same jury to decide between death and life without parole.

  Murder 1 without special circumstances

    The Jury believed that O.J. premeditated the murder of one of the two
    individual, carried out that murder (Murder 1), then killed the other
    individual without malice aforethought (i.e. manslaughter), in self
    defense, or not at all (i.e. someone else killed the other individual
    and O.J was not involved).

  Murder 2

    The Jury believed that O.J. did not premeditate the murder but on the
    spur of the moment without provocation decided to kill one or both
    individuals with malice aforethought. This definition is obscure and
    more often than not the only way a jury finds Murder 2 is if it's the
    maximum charge or if they are compromising with each other.

  Voluntary Manslaughter

    The Jury believed that O.J. did not premeditate the murder but on the
    spur of the moment with provocation or passion killed one or both of
    the individuals.

    The Jury believed that O.J. killed the individuals because he had an
    UN-reasonable but immediate fear for his life. 

  Involuntary Manslaughter

    The Jury believed that O.J. did not premeditate the murder but on the
    spur of the moment with provocation or passion lost control, and
    attacked the individuals which resulted in them being killed.

  Not Guilty

    The Jury believed that O.J. did not do it, killed because of a reasonable
    and immediate fear for his life, or was insane.

  There are other variations and that's somewhat of an oversimplification but
that's pretty much the way the law was described at the end of the Menendez
trial.

  George
9.2017CSC32::GAULKEFri Jun 24 1994 18:1532
9.2018HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 24 1994 18:344
  Exactly.

  George
9.2019CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsFri Jun 24 1994 18:5240
Of Course on the opposite end of the California spectrum is Connecticut.

Thanks to the Tracy Thurman (might have the name wrong) case, in Connecticut,
if the police are called to your abode for any kind of domestic case,
they routinely give a summons.

They are not required by law to cite individuals, but rather the law in
CT states that the Police Officers are held liable should they not cite someone
and are subject to a fine should further domestic violence occurs 
and someone gets harmed.

That's great in some cases.


But what REALLY happens is that two people are arguing (no physical stuff
just the typical argument you'd have with a spouse sometime -- f you, no
f you, no f YOU, no F YOU) and the neighbor calls the cops.  The cops come
and by that time everything is all over.   A simple shouting match that
ran its course.   Now the cops know that if they don't issue a summons
if anything happens later they're liable and subject to a fine, so they
do their damndest to get the folks all riled up again, at which point
they issue  a summons to everybody, even when both parties swear neither
touched the other.

That has happened to at least three married couples I know.

What happens after that?   Well, when all these laws got passed, they set up
all these mandatory counseling programs run by state counselors.   So these
folks who are normal people end up taking up some state employees time.

One friend of mine told me that counselor said "Look, I figure you guys
just had an argument, but I've got to go through all this stuff with you"


Now you know why Ct has the highest taxes in the nation.  Talk about
overkill.


But hey, we won't have another domestic violence murder with all these
laws......  or will we?
9.2021Sheer LunacySTRATA::BARBIERIFri Jun 24 1994 20:469
      re: -1
    
      If we had a law for every circumstance that could save a single
      life, we would bankrupt this nation what with the attendant costs
      of 'following the law' as in the CT case.
    
      That argument that if it saves one life is just not practical.
    
                                                   Tony
9.2022CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsFri Jun 24 1994 20:5076
>     This is a big old rathole but why was the law enacted? Let me
>    guess, a woman was killed. And maybe her name was Tracy Thurman?

Basically, her boyfriend was beating up on her.  Cops were called, did
nothing.  Boyfriend came back later and slashed her up.  

Ironically, if she had been killed, we probably wouldn't have the law.



>    Seems like a small price to pay if even a single life is saved
>    or someone is spared a small amount of time living in misery.

Yes and no.

Actually what it is is a case of pass the buck.  The cops feel they have
to cite

>    I doubt many neighbors call the cops because of one argument. 

Depends on how your neighbors feel about you.  Had one friend who
had problems with the neighbors.  I don't know what caused it all
but the neighbors were constantly complaining about this or
that or the next thing -- it seemed more ornery than anything real legit
to me.

Last summer they had an argument, windows open, basically a big
"f you" shouting match and the neighbors called.    By the time the cops
got there all was forgotten and the couple was actually getting ready to
leave go shopping.  By the time the cops left, they'd been cited for
disorderly, I believe, and the day was ruined.  They both had to go through
this mandatory "counseling" which consisted of telling the story
(seperately of course) to the poor bastard who works for the state, then
commiserating about how messed up the system is.   They talked to the
prosecutor who nollied the case.  It worked out okay, but didn't have
to happen -- if the cops had been more judicious.



>If
>    you and your spouse are constantly raising hell then you *need*
>    counseling. There was a time a few months ago when damn near every
>    day some guy went off the deep end and killed his wife or girlfriend
>    here in Mass. It usually made the paper then was forgotten.
>    

Ah, musta been the water...8^)

Seriously, there are periods like that -- it's weird.  I used to notice
it when I was on the ambulance.  Folks laugh about the full moon, but
man, that is one time when incidents of this stuff goes up, but there are
other times too we just couldn't explain.

Agreed about the counseling comment too, but there's a difference between
the constant arguing and normal differences of opinion I think....



>      As for Connecticut having the highest taxes in the country, you're 
>    also the wealthiest state in the country - you get no sympathy here.

Demographics fool you.  All the rich folk Noo-Yawk wannabes down in the
Gold Coast sway the mean.  Go out in the east part of the state and you'll
find some dirt poor folks....

It's easier for them rich folks to pay the taxes than most of the rest
of us 8^)   

But I live here because I like it here.  It's where I was born and grew
up, and I like it, asinine governor, high taxes, or not....


'Saw



9.2024HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 24 1994 20:5926
RE                     <<< Note 9.2021 by STRATA::BARBIERI >>>

>      That argument that if it saves one life is just not practical.
    
  I agree, but in this case we're not talking about one life. The problem of
women getting beaten and murdered by husbands and boyfriends has reached
epidemic proportions. It's the leading cause of violent death among women and
one of the hardest crimes to control. 

  For example, if a bank robber cons a parole board into letting him out, it's
not often that he goes out the 1st day, grabs the closest thing to a weapon,
makes a bee-line to the last bank he robbed, kicks the door down tries to hold
up the place while screaming at the top of his lungs, then shoots himself after
killing the teller and taking the money. 

  But that flavor of thing happens all the time with these domestic violence
cases. These guys are just plane nuts. Kamikaze pilots had more regard for life
and exercised more common sense and restraint than some of these kooks. And
to top it off, 9 out of 10 think that what ever happened is all the woman's
fault.

  Heck, if a couple screaming idiots who keep the neighbors up at night have
to do a couple counseling sessions to help get this problem under control that's
a small price to pay.

  George
9.2026HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jun 24 1994 21:035
  Uh-oh, now we've gone and done it.

  George

9.2027big newsFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaFri Jun 24 1994 22:112
    The judge just disbanded the grand jury due to the media influence. 
    Shapiro moved for this and was granted it.
9.2028HELIX::MAIEWSKISat Jun 25 1994 01:5319
  Well he didn't disbanded the grand jury he recused them from continuing
with this case. They still continue with other work they may have.

  Court TV says that both Shapiro and Gil Garcetti in separate actions asked
the judge to take the grand jury off the case due to the publicity including
the 911 tape. The court then determined that members of the Grand Jury had
heard evidence not presented by the prosecutor and pulled them off the case. 

  The matter will now go to a preliminary hearing this coming Thursday in which
the state must lay out their case in public. The defense will now have the
opportunity to cross examine witnesses and challenge evidence which they can
not do during a Grand Jury hearing. 

  This is a really big win for the defense but the prosecution may have avoided
problems as well. Had the Grand Jury decided not to indict O.J. for murder but
to indict for a lesser charge like Manslaughter then that would have limited
the trial to manslaughter and O.J. would have been eligible for bail. 

  George
9.2029Too many problems need to be fixed, to fix this oneMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Jun 27 1994 14:4716
    A few Back - Damn Im glad I dont live in CONN... My wife is mostly
    Itailian and when she's mad she can yell.. but in 7 years of marriage
    neither won of us has ever resorted to Physical Violence, but If we
    got wrote up every time we yelled at each other Id have a few too many
    tickets :-)  Id call that overkill, of course I dont know of anyone
    every being killed in any of the towns Ive lived in by there husband or
    boyfriend. Is there a demographic region or Income Level HIGH RISK area
    where this happens, like Poor and Live in City = High Risk ?
    
    The Time/Money/Effort should be spent on Why some area's are more
    common then others and doing something about that...  And if we get
    into that we could fill up this notesfile with One Huge RatHole...
    Too many reasons, too many fixes and without Major Chances to the
    entire system it wont change... (Welfare/Taxes/Police/Housing etc).
    
    								mab
9.2031Ive never known a case up close !!!MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Jun 27 1994 15:186
    I asked if... IF IF IF IF IF it seemed more common ??????
    I didnt suggest anything !!! Also (A 2nd ?'s) Do the Killers seem
    to have Criminal Records, that seems to be a very common factor as
    well... Maybe were parolling some of these folks too early ? (Again
    a ?'s)
    							mab
9.2032HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jun 27 1994 18:0232
RE                 <<< Note 9.2031 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>

>    I asked if... IF IF IF IF IF it seemed more common ??????
>    I didnt suggest anything !!! Also (A 2nd ?'s) Do the Killers seem
>    to have Criminal Records, that seems to be a very common factor as
>    well... Maybe were parolling some of these folks too early ? (Again
>    a ?'s)

  The guys doing the serious domestic violence are often a different group than
the career criminals. Typically they have had minor brushes with the law but
nothing big like bank robbery or murder. 

  This problem seems to cut across race, religion, and economic status. More
often than not the guys dealing out the abuse were abused themselves as kids
as apposed to growing up in an economically deprived area.

  By the way, since my last note, two more women were shot in the greater
Boston area, one dead, one critical. Both boy friends are in police custody. 

RE O.J.'s case

  F. Lee Bailey, one of O.J.'s lawyers, has been making statements lately
challenging much of the evidence that was leaked to the press. He now says
that not only is there no ski mask, there is no stewardess who will testify
that O.J. was bleeding on the plane, there is no woman who saw O.J. near
the scene, and there is no body tissue from O.J. at the scene. He also claims
that O.J. has an alibi.

  We'll see Thursday when the prosecution presents it's case at the preliminary
hearing.

  George
9.2033FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaMon Jun 27 1994 18:042
    Bailey also ruled out a temporary insanity defense and stated he will
    challenge the evidence.
9.2034They may end up with Just Circumstancial EvidenceMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Jun 27 1994 18:1212
    Man LA might get hammered again ? have to wait and see just what
    eveidence they really have and what holds water, could we all have
    misjudge'd OJ based on what the Media Over Hyped ?  My Inlaws have
    him all but DEAD, saying he should get the death penalty and the
    case hasnt even gone to court yet, Im sure there's many poeple out
    there with the same Opinion, thats too bad... But I too felt when
    he dissapeard and was no where to be found that he was guiley and
    trying to find a way out....????
    
    Man what the Media can do to ya....
    
    								>mab
9.2035USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jun 27 1994 21:187
Imagine if he is *proven* innocent (ironic, isn't it ?...he's supposed
to be proven guilty !) ?  I wouldn't want to be part of the LA prosecution
staff (read: kiss your career good-bye)...and what a statement about the
power of the media...and our society's adherence to the judicial process.

So far the biggest thing (IMO) that makes him look guilty is his running.
The Prosecution better hope that DNA test ID's him.
9.2036HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jun 28 1994 14:1318
  The dueling media lawyers of the O.J. Simpson case have now turned their
attention to a phone call. Yesterday the coroners report for Nicole Simpson
reported that she had talked with her mother on the phone at 11PM the night of
the murder. F. Lee Bailey, attorney for O.J. Simpson, says that Simpson was at
home at 11PM waiting for his limo to take him to the airport. 

  Since then, Nicole's parents have been reported to have said that the call
was really at 10PM and that they are waiting for the phone bill to confirm the
time. 

  Meanwhile the prosecution may have suffered a major setback. Their witness
that placed O.J. hurrying away from the scene of the murder is reported to have
collected $100,000 from the TV program "Hard Copy" for giving them her story.
If this is true it could be used by defense lawyers on cross examination to
destroy her credibility. This was done to one of the most important prosecution
witnesses by Defense lawyer Roy Black in the William Kennedy Smith trial.

  George
9.2037Hearing is going on now...FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaTue Jun 28 1994 16:221
    
9.2038HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Tue Jun 28 1994 16:502
    Any update?
    
9.2039FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaTue Jun 28 1994 17:333
    Not much new, they haggled over testing samples of evidence.  The
    prosecution won a movement to take hair samples of OJ to test against
    hair in a cap found at the scene.
9.2040PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Jun 28 1994 23:078
  Well, it's been reported that Rosie Greer, who's an ordained minister, has
  been visiting the Juice in jail. Billy Graham has also been talking to the
  Juice on the phone.

  However, there are no reports of any TeeVee preachers consoling the families
  of the 2 people who were butchered.

	Keith
9.2041(8^)*PTOVAX::JACOBFresh from a week of I &amp; IWed Jun 29 1994 01:315
    Well, Michael Jackson has visited O.J. and offered to look after his
    kids while he's in jail.
    
    JaKe
    
9.2042HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jun 29 1994 13:3628
  At the hearing yesterday the Robert Shapiro, lawyer for O.J. Simpson stated
that the defense would turn over hair samples as reported in an earlier note. 

  There was also a debate between Shapiro and lead prosecutor Marcia Clark
over how the defense would be given access to evidence currently held by the
state. The defense wanted samples of all evidence turned over immediately to
allow for 4 days of analysis. That would have made the results available by
Monday which would be only two court days into the preliminary hearing. 

  The prosecution replied that it would take until Thursday morning to have a
complete list of what was available. They also said that while some evidence
like blood samples could be split, other evidence like hair strands and hair
follicles might not be abundant enough to be supplied to the defense. They
offered as an alternative allowing the defense to be present when the tests
were done. 

  The defense agreed to come to the tests but still insisted that they be given
samples to run their own tests. The prosecutor reminded the court that she was
not obliged to allow the defense to view their tests but was doing it as a
favor. She then asked that her expert be allowed to view the defense tests. The
defense objected saying that since the burden of proof was on the state not the
defendant that their tests were not required so that there was no reason for
the prosecution to be present. 

  The prosecution promised to have the list of what could be split and what
could not be split available Thursday morning. 

  George 
9.2043DZIGN::ROBICHAUDThe Wind Cries MaryWed Jun 29 1994 15:468
9.2044FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 29 1994 16:192
    Ex-Oiler, Mike Barber, has an FCA prison ministry too and have paid OJ
    a few visits.
9.2045CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Wed Jun 29 1994 18:2515
    Has any mention of the "real killers" been mentioned yet by the defense
    team or OJ?

    I would be mighty p*said at who ever killed someone I loved, and was
    the cause of my imprisonment (as well as possibly setting me up for the
    fall...).

    You'd think someone would have said "I wish the police would start
    working to catch the real killers instead of trying to make me
    guilty!!!"
                                                  
    I think at this late date someone would make a reference to the real
    killers...

    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.2046The REAL storyCAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 29 1994 18:4429
>    I think at this late date someone would make a reference to the real
>    killers...

Okay, I'm not supposed to say anything Chip, but if you promise not to tell
I'll fill you in on the real secret.

You see, it wasn't OJ that killed his wife and her friend, it was Space
Aliens.

It's a little known fact that Goldman was actually taken over four years
ago by a Space Alien intelligence.  He was one of their operatives here
on Earth.   Then, over time, he began to 'go rogue' and act more and
more human.

My sources say he was just on the verge of spilling his guts about the
whole Space Alien/Greys thing when they decided to kill him.

The hit was not supposed to take place at Nicole's house, and it was
an unfortunate circumstance that they had to carry out the hit in front
of her.  

After they did Goldman, she had seen too much and had to be eliminated.


I could get in a lot of trouble for telling you this, so don't spread
it around, and don't mention my name.....


'Saw
9.2047ratings schmatingsMASALA::DWALLACENurses ? I love 'emWed Jun 29 1994 19:064
    Reason the Grays were here was to secure a network deal for soccer
    next year after seeing hoops & baisbawl were cack :-)
    
    Davie.
9.2048HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jun 29 1994 19:1015
  No one in O.J.'s camp has come up with a theory of who really did it. Several
who have been asked including his girl friend Paula have brushed off the
question or they have said that they just don't know. 

  The defense will take the position that it doesn't matter who really did it.
They will say that the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove that O.J.
was the one who did it, not their burden to prove that he didn't by coming up
with another suspect. 

  If nothing else, the fact that there is no other suspect is a major factor
lighting a fire under the prosecution, but they have to find some other means
to prove their case. An argument for process of elimination may not even be
admissible in court.

  George
9.2049CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Wed Jun 29 1994 19:2511
    I know the defense doesn't have to find someone else guilty to make OJ
    innocent...  I just think its weird that OJ hasn't expressed a desire
    to see these people be brought to justice.  Not on tv before the
    arrest, not in the letters, not during the car chase, not after.

    If OJ didn't do it, the person who did has made his life a living hell,
    one would think he would have some hard feelings toward these folks.

    Datsall.

    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.2050CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 29 1994 19:3213
I'm still with you Chip.

I cannot believe that he has not come out and said "I didn't do it and 
I want to find the bastards that did..."

I'd be going nuts if I was in jail for something I didn't do......


Course, I'm nuts to begin with so what can I say.....


'Saw

9.2052HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jun 29 1994 19:475
  It's a major point. The fact that no other suspect seems likely and there
seems to be no scenario pointing to the likelihood of another suspect will be a
major driving force behind what goes on if not in court itself. 

  George
9.2053Those pesky So. Cal. space aliens...HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Wed Jun 29 1994 19:492
    I didn't meet those aliens, not that I can remember...
    
9.2054CAMONE::WAYReal men use iron sightsWed Jun 29 1994 19:598
>                   -< Those pesky So. Cal. space aliens... >-
>
>    I didn't meet those aliens, not that I can remember...

These guys are the equivalent of the Space Alien Mafia....  The ones you
met were kinda like the equivalent of the Space Alien Keystone Kops....8^)
    

9.2055CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunWed Jun 29 1994 21:055
 F. Lee Bailey did ask Shapiro why he wasn't ask the police to find the other
 killers and Shapiro said his job is to prove OJ innocent and nothing else.

 mike
9.2056PTOVAX::JACOBFresh from a week of I &amp; IWed Jun 29 1994 23:494
    Shapiro, IMHO, is a bungling fool.
    
    JaKe
    
9.2057a joke for yaCNTROL::CHILDSLet Love Have It's WayThu Jun 30 1994 01:1310
so anyways this is about a week old or so but just in case you missed it:

 Did you hear OJ's innocent?



 He played for the Bills, they choke, they don't stab........

 mike
9.2058HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 30 1994 13:408
RE        <<< Note 9.2056 by PTOVAX::JACOB "Fresh from a week of I & I" >>>

>    Shapiro, IMHO, is a bungling fool.
    
  How so? So far it appears that he's doing a 1st rate job. Have you caught
him in an error?

  George
9.2059MSE1::FRANCUSNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsThu Jun 30 1994 14:157
    what a zoo. all the networks are planning on showing todays proceedings
    live. they're gonna make all those Soaps fans real happy. maybe there
    will be a major assasination or somethin' that will force 'em all to 
    cover something else.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2060HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 30 1994 14:3918
  The hearing could last anywhere from several days to a week. The circus will
all die down. The 1st day or so it will be: 

    ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Court TV

  By next week it will be down to:

    CNN, Court TV

  By late in the week it will be only:

    Court TV

  A couple good 2 hour battles between Robert Shapiro and Marcia Clark over the
timing in which a folder of copies of DNA reports is to be delivered will shake
off the big three pretty quick. 

  George
9.2061PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFThu Jun 30 1994 16:0428
>  How so? So far it appears that he's doing a 1st rate job. Have you caught
>him in an error?

  Well, I don't think the prosecution or the defense is doing a first rate
  job. They all seem to be more concerned about their TV image than justice.
  I doubt that either performance to this date will appear in any law
  school textbooks. For Shapiro, here's a couple of things that I think he
  bungled:

	1. When asked how he will defend his client, he answered that all 
	   possible defenses will be explored. A lot of people would take 
	   that to mean he could get his client to plea bargain, plead innocent
	   by reason of insanity or plead innocent. He would have been much
	   better off just telling the press that he would defend his client
	   with "the truth" and then waiting to evaluate the evidence before
	   giving any details about the defense tactics. For many people,
	   the way Shapiro answered that question, implied that the Juice 
	   really did it.

	2. How about his tall tale about how the Juice escaped. According to
	   him, there were a couple of doctors, Al Collings and himself
	   all present. He was due in the police station shortly and everybody
	   was concerned about the Juice offing himself. Meanwhile the Juice
	   is wailing and everybody conveniently finds themselves in another 
	   room while the Juice escapes. But nobody notices that the wailing
	   stopped and the Juice escapes. His yarn sounds really fishy to me.

		Keith 
9.2062uh, yer honor????CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Jun 30 1994 16:3011
    
    
    	Yabbut where's Hawk just when ya need a bailiff to whack his
    pee-pee?
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    proud of serving in da_jury during Da_Trial!
    Kev
    
9.2063MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Jun 30 1994 16:327
    re: .2061
    
    On the other hand law textbooks and the actual practice of law more
    often than not have nothing to do with one another.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2064HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jun 30 1994 17:0047
                    <<< Note 9.2061 by PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF >>>

>  Well, I don't think the prosecution or the defense is doing a first rate
>  job. They all seem to be more concerned about their TV image than justice.

  As the Court TV reporter said, both sides are giving their opening statements
to the jury pool. As for justice, both Clark and Shapiro are court officers and
have to follow the law and rules of ethics, but within that they both have a
fiduciary responsibility to zealously represent their clients, in this case the
state and O.J. respectively. 

  In other words, they are doing the Leo Derocer thing of reading the rules to
see what they can do, not what they can't do. 

>	1. When asked how he will defend his client, he answered that all 
>	   possible defenses will be explored. ... For many people,
>	   the way Shapiro answered that question, implied that the Juice 
>	   really did it.

  Well maybe. Other's will just think he's doing what he has to do to defend
his client. Also that hasn't been given much press.

>	2. How about his tall tale about how the Juice escaped. ... But nobody
>          notices that the wailing
>	   stopped and the Juice escapes. His yarn sounds really fishy to me.

  Most people who are wailing stop after a bit, especially if their best friend
is talking to them. It was a surprise to everyone that he took off. And it's
not at all clear that he was escaping, many people believe he was trying to get
to the cemetery to commit suicide. 

  On the plus side, Shapiro has done a ton of other things that are pretty good
including: 

  1. Getting the Grand Jury recused and getting a preliminary hearing.

  2. Getting the media spin against his client started by the D.A. under
     control.

  3. Forcing Marcia Clark to stand up and say "there is no ski mask".

  4. Conducting a full court press on discovery.

  5. Putting together an all-star defense team and getting them to work
     together.

  George
9.2065CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Thu Jun 30 1994 18:067
    There is (according to a CNN/USA Today survey) also much sympathy for
    OJ.  If Shapario had anything to do with the letter read by whathisname
    and the escape, etc. one would think getting any sympathy for a 
    guy who was on the 911 call, them accused of a double slasher murder
    is doing pretty well...

    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.2066METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jun 30 1994 18:267
Heard on WEEI on the way back to the office:

Shapiro cross-examining the expert witness re: evidence and supposedly
has damaged the expert's credibility.

The Crazy Met

9.2067;-)FRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Thu Jun 30 1994 18:311
    yes and he did a fine job.  
9.2068Mel Ott never killed anyoneAKOCOA::BREENCome to DaddyThu Jun 30 1994 18:3210
    >Leo Derocer
    
    George, phoenetically I can't fault you but that's Durocher, a not so
    nice guy who also made headlines and spent some time in front of
    judges.
    
    Leo coldcocked a teen outside the ballpark but was never put on trial
    but later was suspended for telling the truth about George MacPhail.
    
    buillthe
9.2069CSC32::GAULKEThu Jun 30 1994 19:498
    
    
    Caught this from Paul Harvey this a.m....
    
    
     Anybody know from where the word  'testimony' is derived?
    
    
9.2070Picture that today...CSC32::GAULKEThu Jun 30 1994 20:0113
    
    
     According to Paul, the Romans did not have any books to swear on,
    as we do today when we use the Bible.
    
     Sooooo, what they did was grab their testicular appendages and
    swear on their manhood.
    
      And now you know the 'left' of the story.
    
    
    
     
9.2071CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Jun 30 1994 20:0210
    
    
    Yup!
    
    Should we spill the beans now or wait a bit?
    
    I remain,
    heard it also
    Kev
    
9.2072testis: witnessHBAHBA::HAASAte a hot dog, made me feel goodThu Jun 30 1994 20:044
It's a_early ancient portmanteau for the state men get in when they get
hit in the groinal region and start to cry.

TTom
9.2073DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Fri Jul 01 1994 12:2710
    	I was feeling sick yesterday, so went home about 11 AM.
    
    	Watched some of the OJ court thing. Shapiro was questioning
    	everything about the criminalist who ran the lab that was in
    	charge of all the samples, etc. Also, Shapiro asked for her
    	vitae and time to look over it before continuing.
    
    	This think is gonna last a long time.
    
    	scott
9.2074HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 01 1994 13:3739
  It should go a couple or three weeks.

  In what could be the 2nd most important decision in this case after the jury
verdict, the defense in the O.J. Simpson case has asked that all of the
evidence taken from O.J.'s house be suppressed. It seems that police detectives
who arrived at O.J.'s house on the morning after the murder with no warrant
scaled the fence and let themselves in when no one answered and opened the
gate. 

  Once inside they found O.J.'s White Ford Bronco with what appeared to be
blood stains and a trail of blood leading from the car to the house and up to a
bedroom and bathroom. They also found a "bloody glove" and a cap with both
short dark and long blond hair. If this gets thrown out it could be a major
blow to the prosecution. 

  The police claim that they were allowed to enter the grounds because they
were able to observe what appeared to be blood from outside the property. Under
California law, if evidence is in plain view, police may make a search without
a warrant. But if the court determines that the evidence was not in view, all
evidence taken from O.J.'s house could become inadmissible. 

  If the evidence is admitted and O.J. is found guilty, this would no doubt be
grounds for appeal. 

  At the hearing a store clerk and the owner of the store testified that they
sold O.J. an expensive "collector's" knife that is about 15 inches long when
opened including the handle. The blade is thin with one edge and the handle was
carved from the antlers of some animal.

  The clerk testified that after his grand jury testimony, he made arrangements
with "Hard Copy" to sell his story for $12,000. The owner testified that the
money would be split 3 ways between the clerk, himself, and his brother who is
a co-owner of the store. The clerk testified that someone named "Patty" who
worked for the D.A. told him that it was ok to talk to the press. 

  Most of the rest of the hearing consisted of haggling over the defense being
allowed to either test or view testing of the material evidence. 

  George 
9.2075CNTROL::CHILDSLet Love Have It's WayFri Jul 01 1994 13:412
 OJ's gonna walk..........
9.2076what will it come to?HBAHBA::HAASAte a hot dog, made me feel goodFri Jul 01 1994 13:424
I guess the nexted step in this sordid mess will be p-name wagers about
the outcome of OJ's case.

TTom
9.2077MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jul 01 1994 15:327
    re: .2074
    
    There was also something about the police coming to tell OJ's kids what
    had happened which is why they got onto the property another time.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2078just on the news wireMSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jul 01 1994 16:336
    Well I mentioned a few back that another major event could get rid of
    the Simpson story. Almsot happened. Arafat is making his first visit to
    the Gaza strip today and there was an assasination attempt on him. 
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2079CSC32::GAULKEFri Jul 01 1994 16:359
    
    
    >> Arafat is making his first visit to the Gaza strip today and there
    >> was an assasination attempt on him.
    
    
     What a surprise!
    
    
9.2080HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 01 1994 16:4820
RE               <<< Note 9.2077 by MSE1::FRANCUS "Mets in '94" >>>

>    There was also something about the police coming to tell OJ's kids what
>    had happened which is why they got onto the property another time.
    
  If that's their excuse for going on to the property then the evidence is
toast. 

  They claim there was blood on the curb and that they could see blood from
outside the gate. If that's true then they would be allowed to go in uninvited
and secure the evidence. 

  If they just broke in to tell the relatives the sad news and didn't see the
blood until they got inside, then that would be an illegal search. All evidence
they found would be out and anything that they discovered elsewhere because of
leads provided by that evidence would be "fruit of the poisoned tree" and
would be excluded. 

  Big decision coming down,
  George 
9.2081MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jul 01 1994 16:505
    Well I admit it I'm home and have the TV on to the pretrial hearing.
    Not all that much like Perry Mason, but then he only had an hour.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2082DZIGN::ROBICHAUDThe Wind Cries MaryFri Jul 01 1994 16:524
    	I bet Theodoric Of York, Medieval Lawyer could figure out of
    OJ was guilty or not...
    
    				  /Don
9.2083HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 01 1994 17:033
  Met, can you give us an update.

  George
9.2084MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jul 01 1994 17:1110
    Testimony by the floor manager at the restaurant weere Nicole Brown had
    dinner that night - re returning the glasses. Terstimony by a co-worker
    of Ron Goldman. Testimony by a neighbor os Nicole about a dog
    incessantly barking at Nicole's home starting abotu 10:15PM. Defense
    pointed out some contradictions with statements the police took. Not
    all that much happening, no new revelations.
    
    In recess until 1:15 Eastern
    The Crazy met
    
9.2085FRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Fri Jul 01 1994 17:181
    Like I said weeks ago, he'll get off on manslaughter.
9.2086CSC32::GAULKEFri Jul 01 1994 17:2113
    
    
      I heard this morning something about finding pieces of a knife
    in one the wastewater treatment tank at an airport. This processing
    tank would be one that processes that nice blue_water used in airlines,
    then recycled to be used as 'Blue_ice' by Rubber-Maid.
    
      If so, I'm glad I'm not in OJ's shoes.
    
      He can get in a lot of trouble for putting a foreign object in 
    an airplane toilet. 
    
      
9.2087HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Fri Jul 01 1994 17:482
    Could Brother Theodore convict him?
    
9.2088MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jul 01 1994 18:016
    Some evidence in an envelope that is suspected to be the knife. May be
    revealed later today. Handed in by - I think I got this right - the
    defense. This is the knife that OJ purchased.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2089clearer muddleMSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jul 01 1994 18:2414
    The defense submitted an envelope as evidence. A retired superior court
    judge acting as a special master ruled that it should remain closed.
    One other superior court judge suggested it should be opened. Presiding
    judge is reserving judgement on this. If the defense wants to submit
    the contents as evidence they have to show the contents to the
    prosecution first - something called reciprocal discovery.
    
    Law analysts are saying that if the defense does not plan on entering
    the contents as evidence they have no idea what the defense is
    thinking. Unusual for the defense to submit evidence in a pre-trial
    hearing.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2090MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jul 01 1994 18:559
    Lunch recess.
    
    More on reciprocal discovery. Prosecution must show the defense
    everything they find, whether or not they plan on using it in court.
    Defense only needs to show the prosecution items it will use as part of
    the defense.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2091HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 01 1994 19:0918
  If it is a knife, there is a reason that was mentioned last night as to why
the defense would be presenting it as evidence. 

  The prosecution doesn't have the murder weapon, only a coroners report saying
that the victims were murdered with a knife. 

  The prosecution called a witness to say that O.J. bought a knife. 

  If O.J. can't produce the knife, then the prosecution can imply that he
murdered the victims with that knife then threw it away. If he provides the
knife, and tests show it was not consistent with the wounds, then the
prosecution is back to square one on the murder weapon. 

  If O.J. did not use this particular knife for the murder (either because
he didn't do it or because he used a different knife), then he might have
had someone bring the knife in to Shapiro.

  George
9.2092CSTEAM::FARLEYFri Jul 01 1994 19:1713
    
    
    	Yabbut how's this for a whacked-out idea?
    
    When they have the actual trial, how's about them holding it in da Rose
    Bowl and charge admission?????
    
    Certainly could help Calif's budgetary problems, eh?
    
    I remain,
    thinking it would be fitting the circus atmosphere too
    Kev
    
9.2093HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 01 1994 19:216
  Don't laugh, they could probably fill it with little effort at $20 a throw.

  Actually, wouldn't the Coliseum be more appropriate? I believe that's where
U.S.C. plays.

  George 
9.2094AKOCOA::BREENFri Jul 01 1994 19:355
    they could have cheerleaders for defense and prosecution and announce
    the jury.
    
    And they could have some idjit running around in a scales costume as
    mascot
9.2095CSTEAM::FARLEYFri Jul 01 1994 19:396
    
    
    	Yabbut I think we're onto something here!
    
    Tickets would be good for one day only
    
9.2096CSC32::GAULKEFri Jul 01 1994 20:0110
    
     
    
      Every time the prosecution calls a new witness, the chariot
    can come out and circle the field, and the band can play 
    that obnoxious tune that seems to get played every time
    Charlton Heston dons a tunic.
    
      
      
9.2097HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 01 1994 20:0222
  I got a report from home. This is 2nd hand so it may be off a bit. 

  The neighbor that discovered the bodies testified. From what I heard, he
testified that he heard the dog barking and basically going nuts at around
10:15PM. He went out some time later when the dog wouldn't stop barking and
noticed blood on it's paws. 

  There was something about him trying to take the dog somewhere but I'm not
sure about that. At some point after 11, he decided to take the dog for a walk
to try to calm it down and came across the bodies. The dog belonged to Nicole. 

  At one point O.J. gave some sort of emotional response over pictures of the
bodies. From what I heard the pictures were placed up on some sort of board but
covered out of respect for family members in the audience. The prosecutor would
uncover them as she wanted to show them to the witnesses. 

  The pundits at Court TV, including Roy Black, said that what she was doing
was classic grandstanding and had nothing to do with sensitivity towards family
members. 

  Hollywood,
  George
9.2098FRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Fri Jul 01 1994 20:172
    OJ got a little squeamish too when they talked of the "river of blood"
    coming from Nicole and flowing down the walkway.
9.2099CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Fri Jul 01 1994 21:0031
    RE: 2097
    
    Well, being a short timer, home office guy, the testimony wasn't quite
    like that...

    The dog guy heard the animal start at 10:15 and heard it continue until
    he went to bed.  A husband and wife found the bodies during their walk
    and only saw Nicole Brown on the ground.  The wife only saw the body
    for a second.

    They all turned green at looking at the pictures, although it seemed 
    that showing them the pictures were consistent with everything else
    the prosecution has done.

    The defense provided two surprises.  The tapes, which the prosecutor 
    mentioned held the date 6/14 and wasn't brought forward to discovery
    until a few moments ago, couldn't listen to the mini-cassette tape
    and they are now listening to them.   No one knows what is in the
    sealed envelop although Shapiro looks pretty smug about it.

    If they had definitive proof the OJ is innocent, and held it until
    now (from the 14th) he should be ran up a rail.  I'm guessing that
    it ain't proof positive of innocence.  

    I had to talk to someone for about 45 minutes during this, so I might 
    have missed something, but that is what I've seen so far...

    I can't help but think my man did this, but if he didn't this must be
    a pretty good form of hell for a guy...

    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.2100Dog's Impact On Time of Phone CallSTRATA::BARBIERIFri Jul 01 1994 22:129
      Testimony of dogs barking at 10:15 sure makes the uncertainty
      of the phone call of Nicole Simpson's mother with Nicole a
      lot less so.  In other words, they probably did talk before
      the dogs barked and thus not at 11:00.
    
      Obviously, an 11:00 phone call verified by the phone company
      would have been O.J.'s best defense.
    
                                                    Tony
9.2101HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Sat Jul 02 1994 14:303
    Anyone hear a rumor that OJ's son is in on it and OJ's protecting him?
    (The one that came up to the Bronco after the chase...)
    
9.2102CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Mon Jul 04 1994 15:1310
    It looks to me like someone else must be in on it (if the Juice is
    guilty), even if it was an after the fact clean-up role.  OJ simply
    did not have enough time to clean and fly unless he had from 10:15
    and mebbe some help.

    If he had until 10:15p, he could have dumped that knife anywhere.  If 
    he had someone dump the knife for him, it could be at the bottom of
    the Atlantic by now.

    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.2103Happy 4th to anyone else in here 2dayPTOVAX::JACOBMon Jul 04 1994 17:443
    Somebody'll find the knife in a can of Tropicana someday.
    
    JaKe
9.2104MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Tue Jul 05 1994 00:344
    Hi JaKe.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2105Fresh Squeezed!SAHQ::ZOGRANTue Jul 05 1994 17:245
    ANybody out there have any updates on the OJ hearings?  Gee, maybe
    they'll open up the envelope and find that free Ginsu knife OJ sent
    for!
    
    UMDan
9.2106CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jul 05 1994 17:2516
    
    
    	Yabbut I still say the dawg did it!
    
    Also, inside the envelope is
    
    
    
    
    
    
    		a new HavaHeart flea collar!
    
    
    ta boom!
    
9.2107stick a fork in himCSTEAM::FARLEYThu Jul 07 1994 16:247
    
    
    	The judge in the OJ spectacle has just ruled that the evidence that
    the cops found *before* getting the search warrent is admissible in
    court.
    
    
9.2108CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Thu Jul 07 1994 16:286
Yabbut, one guy said on Imus this morning that the reason the defense
made all those motions was to set up an appeal....


I don't really have an opinion one way or the other in this, but if
those LA Cops had "exigent circumstances" I'm the Queen of England....
9.2109METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jul 07 1994 16:566
All in one voice while looking at 'Saw:

God save my country god save my liberty god save the Queen

The Crazy Met

9.2110HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jul 07 1994 17:0225
  The judge took the safe course. By admitting the evidence, they can to go
ahead with the trial and if he's found guilty a higher court can sort it all
out afterwards by either changing the law to say that it was ok or by ordering
another trial without the evidence. Had she thrown it out, the prosecution
would not have had the right to appeal after an acquittal. 

  The prosecution may have another problem though. The cops obviously lied
about the reason they went to O.J.'s house. The other family members were
notified over the phone or by a single "uniform" which is department policy. By
contrast, the 4 lead detectives were sent to O.J.'s house, 2 claiming that they
were there only to keep the other 2 from getting lost. 

  At a real trial, the defense will be able to grill them on this during cross,
bring in witnesses to say this is not normal procedure, then suggest to the
jury "if the cops lied about this, what else did they lie about". 

  The fact that the prosecution had the cops give that type of testimony shows
how much they were worried about the defense motion. 

  Next big thing is the blood. If the DNA test shows that O.J.'s blood was at
the scene, he's toast. Even if he gets off, no one would give him a job
anywhere. He'll be doing radio talk shows in Portland with Tonya. If the blood
is inclusive, then the case will turn on the evidence found at O.J.'s house. 

  George 
9.2111CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Thu Jul 07 1994 17:338
>  Next big thing is the blood. If the DNA test shows that O.J.'s blood was at
>the scene, he's toast. Even if he gets off, no one would give him a job
>anywhere. He'll be doing radio talk shows in Portland with Tonya. If the blood
>is inclusive, then the case will turn on the evidence found at O.J.'s house. 

The guy on Imus the other morning said that it was going to be a blood
case.  I forget his name, but he's the guy that's always wearing the
buckskin jacket.....
9.2112CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Thu Jul 07 1994 17:333
re TCM:

	We are not amused.....
9.2114CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Jul 07 1994 17:439
    
    
    	Yabbut 'saw, what kind of radion do you have?  I ain't never
    heard of a radion with a video screen.......
    
    buckskin jacket?????????
    
    ;^)
    
9.2115USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jul 07 1994 17:463
To me, it seems very probable that the defense is working for a plea (despite
statements to the contrary)....jail time with a chance of parole vs. the
death penalty.
9.2116Which is it?CSC32::J_HENSONand it's still too short!Thu Jul 07 1994 17:483
I'm confused.  Did he say "the Queen", or "a queen"? ;-)

Jerry
9.2117in the year 2025 if oj is still alive...AKOCOA::BREENThu Jul 07 1994 17:4911
    George you understated a bit about re-trial but methings you also agree
    that there is a very good likelihood that this ruling will in fact be
    reversed and a new trial ordered which brings us to 1997,98 and oj is
    still out there.
    
    George, at one point if any can oj be remanded to somekind of
    non-prison type incarceration in all this trial / appeal (I didn't even
    mention the possibility of first trial prior to appeal going to hung
    jury).  It looks like he is facing up to four years in jail of some
    sort before final verdict is handed down (and second trial can generate
    new appeals, no?).
9.2118CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Thu Jul 07 1994 17:5017
>I'm confused.  Did he say "the Queen", or "a queen"? ;-)

The Queen.....

(Off with that bugger's head!)



Kev, let me explain.....

	When Imus got this guy on, he mentioned that he had appeared
	on {CBS This Morning, Good Morning America, Today} pick one, and
	always wore a buckskin jacket.   He's like from Montana or someplace
	like that.

	I wanna say his name is Jim Spence, but I'm probably on hallgueons
	with that....
9.2119Imus guestOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Jul 07 1994 18:001
    Jerry Spence from Wyoming.
9.2120But for now we'll ignore his 4rth Amm rightsMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Jul 07 1994 18:0210
    I think its obvious that his 4rth ammendment rights were stepped on
    and if this were a regular Joe he may have already walked, but being
    a high profile, public type trial the judge didnt have the gonands to
    admit the should be rent a cop wannabess F'd Up and sent a potential
    guilty man back out as a free man...
    
    These rules are in place to protect the guilty, and in his appeal it
    may just happen ...
    
    								MaB
9.2121BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredThu Jul 07 1994 18:0920
|                 <<< Note 9.2120 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
|               -< But for now we'll ignore his 4rth Amm rights >-
|
|    I think its obvious that his 4rth ammendment rights were stepped on
|    and if this were a regular Joe he may have already walked, but being
|    a high profile, public type trial the judge didnt have the gonands to
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^      
|    admit the should be rent a cop wannabess F'd Up and sent a potential
|    guilty man back out as a free man...
|    
|    These rules are in place to protect the guilty, and in his appeal it
|    may just happen ...
|    
|    								MaB
|


	Of course not, the judge is a female.

	Kevin
9.2122HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jul 07 1994 18:1121
RE                 <<< Note 9.2120 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>

>    These rules are in place to protect the guilty, and in his appeal it
>    may just happen ...
    
  No, these rules are in place to protect everyone and the guilty sometimes
take advantage of them.

  The last time you put a sign on your lawn saying "Elect Herbert", where
"Herbert" was running against the Mayor or Sheriff, the 4th amendment was the
reason that the cops didn't bust into your house, tear it apart, and throw you
in jail because of some speck of contraband you may have had lying around from
the mid '70s. 

  The problem here is that this was not a clear 4th amendment violation. It was
in the gray area between "reasonable" and "unreasonable" in a state where the
higher courts are moving in a conservative direction. Under those conditions
it makes sense for a lower court judge to let the upper court figure it all
out. 

  George
9.2123CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Thu Jul 07 1994 18:1232
>    admit the should be rent a cop wannabess F'd Up and sent a potential
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I don't fault the cops for pushing the limit, if they thought they could
get away with it.  If I were a  betting man, I'd be betting that they
figured that OJ did it and wanted to nab him.  They pushed the limit on what
they could do.


>    These rules are in place to protect the guilty, and in his appeal it
>    may just happen ...
    
I disagree totally.  The 4th Ammendment was not put in place to protect
the guilty.  It was put into place because the British at the time could
just walk into anyone's home and search it.  The founding fathers didn't
want that to be able to happen.

The 4th Ammendment protects you from what typcially happens in a police
state (you can read that Nazi Germany if you like), where they just crash
into your house in the middle of the night, looking for whatever they want
to look for without telling you why.

So, bottom line, you have to have a warrant to search someone's home,
unless there are exigent circumstances.  

Personally, I don't feel the police had exigent circumstances in this
case, and their interpretation was mighty, mighty close to the line on
what exigent circumstances are.




9.2124HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jul 07 1994 18:2027
                      <<< Note 9.2117 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    George, at one point if any can oj be remanded to somekind of
>    non-prison type incarceration in all this trial / appeal (I didn't even
>    mention the possibility of first trial prior to appeal going to hung
>    jury).  

  Only if he's acquitted or if the charge of Murder 1 with Special Circumstances
is dropped.

  Consider the case of Eric and Lyle Menendez, the 2 kids in California who
shotguned their parents then got hung juries after saying they were abused
and claiming self defense.

  The shooting took place in August of 1989. They were arrested in Spring of
1990 and finally came to trial last summer. The trial lasted 6 months and ended
in 2 hung juries. Both of them lived in the L.A. County Jail from the time they
were arrested until O.J. was arrested. At that point Eric Menendez was moved
somewhere else because the jail couldn't handle the additional pressure from
the press but they are both still being held awaiting retrial because there is
no bail in a capital case. 

  If he get's indicted for murder 1, O.J.'s going to have very cool heals
before he moves to another residence. And if he is moved before trial, it will
be into another jail.

  George
9.2125Miscellaneous OJ and (former) USSR thoughts ...RHETT::KNORRUNIX Applications SupportThu Jul 07 1994 18:4630
    re: George
    
    Awesome analogy regarding posting an anti-incumbent political sign in
    yer yard.  I suspect it would be tempting for 4th Amendment bashers to
    minimize its significance by using the Nazi Germany (i.e. worst case)
    comparison, when in actuality it protects us from everyday (potential)
    abuses of power.
    
    A few miscellaneous ramblings:
    
    * The OJ Judge is a former prosecutor who is getting kudo's because she
      did a slew of research and uncovered a fairly recent case that 
      supports her decision.  (i.e. admitting the evidence)  Neither the 
      defense nor prosecution uncovered the case.
    
    * A CNN/USAToday poll shows that the vast majority of white Americans
      think OJ is guilty; a significant majority of Afro-Americans (> 60%)
      think he's innocent.  My first reaction was how the race issue hadn't
      really entered my mind.  My 2nd reaction is that that's probably
      becaues I'm a member of the majority race.  My 3rd reaction was that
      I really question the positive value of a poll like this.  My 4th
      (and final) thought is that I can't help but feel much of the Afro-
      American sentiment is the result of big-time distrust of the LAPD.
    
    * Any liberal who criticized Ronald Reagan for calling the Soviet
      Empire "evil" never read Gulag Archipelago.  I'm reading it now,
      and it truly is amazing what human beings will do to one another.
      
    
    - ACC Chris
9.2126CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Thu Jul 07 1994 19:0925
>    Awesome analogy regarding posting an anti-incumbent political sign in
>    yer yard.  I suspect it would be tempting for 4th Amendment bashers to
>    minimize its significance by using the Nazi Germany (i.e. worst case)
>    comparison, when in actuality it protects us from everyday (potential)
>    abuses of power.
>    


You've got me confused with your logic here Chris....

Why would a 4th ammendment basher use Nazi Germany as an example?

I used that example as a prime reason why you WOULD need the 4th, not as
a reason to get rid of it.....



>    * The OJ Judge is a former prosecutor who is getting kudo's because she
>      did a slew of research and uncovered a fairly recent case that 
>      supports her decision.  (i.e. admitting the evidence)  Neither the 
>      defense nor prosecution uncovered the case.

She probably just has good clerks. 8^)


9.2127Perhaps "bash" is not the right verb. "Weaken" is better.RHETT::KNORRUNIX Applications SupportThu Jul 07 1994 19:3121
    re: bad logic by ACC Chris [me]
    
    Ha!  If I were to use bad logic my mind would likely blow up like one
    of those faulty computers on the 60's edition of Star Trek.
    
    No, it makes perfect sense.  Someone bashing the 4th Amendment (i.e.
    trying to lesson its import) would make it appear necessary only in
    "extreme" cases like the Nazi's or (much underpublicized but more
    deadly by orders of magnitude) Communists, particularly (but not
    limited to) Stalin.
    
    Hence the 4th Amendment could be weakened to the point where George's
    analogy could become reality.
    
    Bottom Line: Our forefathers were an amazing collection of folks.
    When you consider some of the things they put into the Constitution
    it's almost like they were Harry Seldon (i.e. Psychohistorians) from 
    Asimov's Foundation.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.2128MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Jul 07 1994 19:378
    Seems to me like far too often an apparent guilty person walks on
    a tech, let alone the obviously guilty one's that get out early.
    
    HUGE PROBLEM IN THIS COUNTRY, lets not even get into million doller
    Gym's, cable TV, swinning etc, etc, etc......  My sister actually new
    a guy who was BE into houses and couldnt wait to get caught...
    
    								MaB
9.2129USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jul 07 1994 19:4926
>Why would a 4th ammendment basher use Nazi Germany as an example?

Maybe he means this isn't Nazi Germany...???


re:  the Judge's reference to another precedent

I heard only pieces of her statement, but she said the precedent case
involved police entering an apartment adjacent to a rape victim's apartment
and finding an unconcious man and evidence that led to his conviction as
the rapist.  The judge said the police could enter the apartment without
a warrant because they heard music, saw lights on, there was no answer
to a knock on the door, and they had reason to believe that the person(s)
in that apartment may have been victimized as well.  This Judge went on
to say that in the Simpson case, the police had a right to go to OJ's
residence because they had 2 small children at the police station, and
should be looking for their father.  They then saw evidence that was
consistent with what they witnessed at the crime scene (blood drops,
the glove, blood on the bronco) and had the right to enter the residence.

...something like that


To me, the biggest problem the police and prosecution have is one mentioned
earlier:  how is that 4 detectives (not street cops) go to OJ's house to
get him (to take care of the kids) ?
9.2130CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu Jul 07 1994 20:0013
re: .2125

I would say the mistrust in the African-American 
community is for the American criminal justice system
in general.  It surely pre-dates Rodney King.  While 
there are many factors involved, there is no denying 
that for a very long time, African-Americans did not
get a fair shake.

I read "Gulag" many years ago.  It does amaze you that
people were treated like that, but remember that it was
a novel.  I suspect that it was not a totally accurate
picture.
9.2131CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Thu Jul 07 1994 20:0120
>    re: bad logic by ACC Chris [me]
>    
>    Ha!  If I were to use bad logic my mind would likely blow up like one
>    of those faulty computers on the 60's edition of Star Trek.

No, I didn't say you were using bad logic.  I just meant that I didn't
understand your logic.  Now that you've clarified it, it makes perfect
sense to me.

    
 >    Bottom Line: Our forefathers were an amazing collection of folks.
 >   When you consider some of the things they put into the Constitution
 >   it's almost like they were Harry Seldon (i.e. Psychohistorians) from 
 >   Asimov's Foundation.
    
    
They were at that.   The insight and foresight they displayed is truly
staggering.   Sometimes I wish we had just one or two like them around
today.....

9.2132Whoa NellieCAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingThu Jul 07 1994 20:1032
                 <<< Note 9.2128 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>

>                 <<< Note 9.2128 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
>
>    Seems to me like far too often an apparent guilty person walks on
>    a tech, let alone the obviously guilty one's that get out early.
    
    Would you rather an innocent person get convicted because he/she is
    "apparently guilty"?  
    
    I never fully appreciated the implications of "presumption of
    innocence" and the need for the system to err on the side of innocence
    until I sat in on jury duty last summer for a rape case.
    
    Whether you care to admit it or not, when you sit through the
    declaration of charges and look at the defendant standing to the
    charges, you believe that person probably committed the crime,
    otherwise it never would have come to a trial.  It is nearly impossible
    to believe otherwise and it's a subconscious prejudice all jurors must
    overcome when listening to the evidence AS PRESENTED BY THE PROSECUTION
    AND THE DEFENSE.
    
    The system works primarily because it minimizes as much as possible, the 
    chances of an innocent person being wrongly convicted.  It isn't
    perfect, but the price is that occasionally an apparently guilty person
    walks.  That's a price I am willing to pay.
    
    Remember, the jury is not convicting a person because they think he or
    she is guilty.  A person is found guilty *only* if the jury believes the
    prosecution presented enough evidence to remove *all* reasonable doubt.
    
    Mark.
9.2133CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Thu Jul 07 1994 20:2112
Well put Mark.

I've never sat on a jury, but I think you hit the nail right on the head.


It's an ethical question -- do you set up your system to minimize the
chances of an innocent person going to jail, or to maximize the chances
that all guilty are punished even if it means an innocent man does time....

Personally, I'd rather see ten guilty men walk than suffer one innocent
man imprisioned, and I think that's what the founding fathers thought too....

9.2134METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jul 07 1994 20:236
=Bob=

"Gulag" was very much based on fact; not just a novel.

The Crazy Met

9.2135Just cause he's a great writer doesn't mean it ain't true.RHETT::KNORRUNIX Applications SupportThu Jul 07 1994 20:316
    Correct, TCM.  Alexander S includes boo-koo references to support
    virtually all of his assertions, to say nothing of his personal
    experiences.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.2136Menedez is a little different, they admitted killingMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Jul 07 1994 20:3223
    Im only thinking of cases were hard evidence was obtained and later
    thown out on a tech.
    
    EXM: Serial Killer, 5 Youths over 6month period killed, on a routine
         traffic violation a car is illegaly searched producine evidence
         that this is the killer, evidence tossed Killer walks moves to
         another state, starts over...
    
    I know this is extreme, and beleive me I know innocent poeple are 
    accused all the time (I was once for a small crime), but 4 of my 
    friends were arrested on Rape Charges, never went to court but just
    what happend at the time of there arrest and in jail prior to the girl
    admitting she lied and them getting out was something I would never
    want to go thru...
    
    I just dont like when HARD EVIDENCE is tossed on a Tech.  If they found
    the murder weapon, glove, and Mrs Simpson Blood at OJ's house and Mrs
    Simpson's blood on OJ's clothes only too have all that evidence tossed
    on a tech then the system didnt work, reasonable doubt is just that but
    to lose on a tech is a whole new ball game...
    
    This case will last a few years thats for sure...
    								mab
9.2137HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jul 07 1994 20:5418
RE                 <<< Note 9.2128 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>

>    Seems to me like far too often an apparent guilty person walks on
>    a tech, let alone the obviously guilty one's that get out early.
    
  Never in the history of our country has any guilty person ever walked on a
technicality. 

  What has happened is that defendants have walked because the government
committed an act that violated their constitutional rights and if allowed to
stand would set a precedent that would endanger the constitutional rights of
every citizen in the nation. 

  They were not "guilty" because by definition they were never convicted in a
fair trial and I don't know about you but I don't consider my rights to be a
technicality. 

  George 
9.2138Couldn't have put it any simplerCAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingThu Jul 07 1994 20:573
    Never thought I'd say this to George, but BRAVO.
    
    Mark.
9.2139CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Thu Jul 07 1994 21:039
Yeah, George -- it's rare that we agree but this time we do.

Consider the fact that for a time in France (it may still be so, I don't know)
their system of justice considered you GUILTY until you proved yourself
innocent.   Imagine what that would be like trying to defend yourself.


Thank God, here in this country, the burden of proof is on the accusor, 
the prosecution.....
9.2140Ideology is wonderful, but not relevant to "gray area" cases...NAC::G_WAUGAMANInside de net! Inside de net!Thu Jul 07 1994 21:1623
    
    I don't have such a problem with the original statement and the 
    semantic use of the word "technicality".  George himself brought 
    up the key word "reasonable" that the Founding Fathers used in the 
    Fourth Amendment definition.  That means that the definition of the
    word "reasonable" has always been subject to interpretation and
    constitutional debate.  It's nearly impossible to disagree with the 
    position that our constitutional rights are sacred, but the statement 
    is so simplistic when applied to a specific case (including this one) 
    as to be almost meaningless.
    
    Yes, I think use of that word "technicality" is accurate in some cases,
    if not in a strict legal sense then in a practical one, concerning
    justice.  Especially when you consider that laws may vary from state 
    to state (until challenged) where defendants in identical circumstances 
    may meet completely opposite fates, and that courts have been known to 
    make mistakes.  (I know, I know, "never in the history of our country 
    has a court made a mistake, at the time the decision was initially 
    rendered...").
    
    
    glenn
    
9.2141CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Thu Jul 07 1994 21:2514
>    justice.  Especially when you consider that laws may vary from state 
>    to state (until challenged) where defendants in identical circumstances 
>    may meet completely opposite fates, 


Now, if we start talking about State's rights, we'll be treading on 
ground that was pretty well traversed from 1861-1865....8^)


Just kidding!

'Saw
    

9.2142It's not a dream world...NAC::G_WAUGAMANInside de net! Inside de net!Thu Jul 07 1994 21:4711
    
> Now, if we start talking about State's rights, we'll be treading on 
> ground that was pretty well traversed from 1861-1865....8^)
    
    True enough... and along those lines, was it a "technicality" that our
    brilliant Founding Fathers in their own world in their own time didn't 
    see fit to make the logical extension to women, slaves, non-property 
    owners... or does that fall under the category of "minor oversight"?  ;-)
    
    glenn
     
9.2143HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jul 07 1994 22:0925
  Remember, under common law what ever applies to the process of convicting
"criminals" sets a precedent that can be used anywhere. Your "technicality" to
get a murderer behind bars becomes the license for the Sheriff to bust in and
break up your political rally. I don't know about you but I can live without
that.

  As for States rights, if O.J. is convicted the decision will have to survive
in both state and federal appeals court. With 4th amendment protection, states
can make the standard more strict but they can not make it less strict. 

  Even if California manages to install conservative judges who allow the
conviction to stand through both the state appeals and state supreme court, the
defense will be able to apply for a writ of habius corpus in Federal District
court and have the federal judiciary test the evidence. 

  Recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings have been leaning toward the police on
this issue, but remember Byron White who was just replaced with Ruth Ginsburg
was usually on the conservative side and many of those cases were 5-4
decisions. 

  This issue should be close throughout the entire appeal process. At the very
least, it will cost both O.J. and the tax payers of California a bundle and
take a decade or more before this issue is resolved.

  George
9.2144METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jul 07 1994 22:138
First, excellent way of putting it George - back a few.

re: .2143

appeals: only if OJ is found guilty; a jury could find him not guilty.

The Crazy Met

9.2145CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 12:4817
>    True enough... and along those lines, was it a "technicality" that our
>    brilliant Founding Fathers in their own world in their own time didn't 
>    see fit to make the logical extension to women, slaves, non-property 
>    owners... or does that fall under the category of "minor oversight"?  ;-)
    
No.

For them, in that time period, and coming from where they came from,
making that logical extension (that seems so normal to us) would have been
the equivalent of what Galileo did by asserting that the Sun was the
center of the Solar System....

That they came up with what they did, to me, is still amazing -- far-sighted,
brilliant men.


8^)
9.2146METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jul 08 1994 13:1714
> slaves

They did have a time limit on slavery; certainly not the right thing to do but
they did deal with the issue to some degree. Again not defending this decision
but nonetheless further than many other countries were willing to go at
that time.

> non-property owners

I'm missing this point. non-property owners could vote, be elected to office,
sit on juries, etc.

The Crazy Met

9.2147If we're weighing in, I think the judge made the right callNAC::G_WAUGAMANInside de net! Inside de net!Fri Jul 08 1994 13:2232
> For them, in that time period, and coming from where they came from,
> making that logical extension (that seems so normal to us) would have been
> the equivalent of what Galileo did by asserting that the Sun was the
> center of the Solar System....
    
    I generally disagree with this, but that's not really my point. 
    [The fathers were certainly not of one mind on these issues, and 
    many argued vehemently against a nation that would selectively 
    permit slavery, with the very same moral arguments that we would use 
    today and have been used since the dawn of written history-- the 
    study of ethics has generally not progressed over modern history.]  
    The point is that what they came up with was a compromise, that
    included a deliberate concession of principle in some cases, which 
    is what common men (and not gods, circa 1787) are restricted to in 
    a real world.  Nothing wrong with that, but they were not so 
    prescient (as in ACChris' Asimov novel) that major, fundamental 
    amendments would never be necessary.  Brilliant, maybe, but certainly 
    not perfect.
    
    George, I still don't think that citing a "technicality"-- and by 
    technicality I'm not talking about a blatant trampling of 4th 
    Amendment rights, but rather a mistake by the courts, or a bad law 
    that is subsequently changed-- sets a precedent for my home to be 
    invaded because of my political beliefs.  And if you're applying that
    opinion to the O.J. Simpson case in particular (I don't know that you
    are); no, I don't see it there with yesterday's ruling, either.  But
    that's just my opinion...
    
    
    glenn
    
9.2148Getting off the track, but...NAC::G_WAUGAMANInside de net! Inside de net!Fri Jul 08 1994 13:2722
    
>> slaves
>
> They did have a time limit on slavery; certainly not the right thing to do but
> they did deal with the issue to some degree. Again not defending this decision
> but nonetheless further than many other countries were willing to go at
> that time.
    
    Time limit only on importation, right?
    
>> non-property owners
>
> I'm missing this point. non-property owners could vote, be elected to office,
> sit on juries, etc.
    
    That's not ny understanding.  Non-property owners may have been
    protected by The Bill of Rights, but it's my understanding that at 
    the time the Constitution was written and for many years after that 
    in some states they did not have the right to vote, etc.
    
    glenn
    
9.2149CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 13:3558
>    I generally disagree with this, but that's not really my point. 
>    [The fathers were certainly not of one mind on these issues, and 
>    many argued vehemently against a nation that would selectively 
>    permit slavery, with the very same moral arguments that we would use 
>    today and have been used since the dawn of written history-- the 
>    study of ethics has generally not progressed over modern history.]  
>    The point is that what they came up with was a compromise, that
>    included a deliberate concession of principle in some cases, which 
>    is what common men (and not gods, circa 1787) are restricted to in 
>    a real world.  Nothing wrong with that, but they were not so 
>    prescient (as in ACChris' Asimov novel) that major, fundamental 
>    amendments would never be necessary.  Brilliant, maybe, but certainly 
>    not perfect.
    
I don't disagree with you.  I guess my point was that for them all
to agree to go that far would have been such a leap for some of them.

And perhaps situational ethics is not a cool thing, but I've always been
of the mind that on MOST issues, you always have to look at it in the
time period in which any situation existed.   Nowadays, slavery 
is abhorent, but back then, to some, it wasn't.  You have to look at things
in that light, IMO.  Somethings, some fundamental truths, shine bright
in any time period, but others don't always seem to....

And I agree with you -- they weren't perfect by any means.  But they 
stood up for what they believed in, and in my book, that's an okay thing.



re Yesterday's Ruling:


	I didn't expect her to do anything less.  I'm no great student
	of the law, and until I write a novel about lawyers (which 
	I probably won't as there's too many out there now) and have to
	do research I probably won't be.   But to me it seemed like she
	did the safe thing, erring perhaps on the side of caution, if
	indeed she erred.

	She's only in the municipal court, and if I've been properly
	informed, the case (ie real trial) will be heard in superior
	court.   So she said, I'll let it in, and let them overturn
	it on appeal if they like.


I'll tell you this, though.   I'm getting sick of all this OJ Simpson
shit -- not in here, where you can still feel free to talk amongst yourselves
as I get verklempt, but on TV.

I'm about OJ Simpson-ed out.  Maybe he killed her, maybe he didn't, but
somehow I can't fathom the Hartford Police Department following ME down
the highway at 45 mph and not blowing me away if I'm a suspect and running.  
In fact, I can't picture the Hartford PD not busting into my house, shooting me
with pepper spray, and handcuffing me, and instead letting me surrender,
if I'm suspected of a double homicide.

So my feeling is getting to be let them decide whatever they want to
decide, I'm starting not to care...
9.2150CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 13:3615
>    That's not ny understanding.  Non-property owners may have been
>    protected by The Bill of Rights, but it's my understanding that at 
>    the time the Constitution was written and for many years after that 
>    in some states they did not have the right to vote, etc.
    
I'd have to do some research, but you may be right.

Wasn't it sometime later that the "free, white and 21" thing came into
play regarding voting?


I remain, to borrow Kev's phrase,
Wondering if I have my college US History notes anywhere,
'Saw    

9.2151Id hate to get murder by someone with $$$, Im Dead They WalkMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Jul 08 1994 13:3830
    Id like to know how VICTIMS of GUILTY MEN WHO WALKED ON TECH's Feel
    on this matter.  Yes, I agree that police personal should not be able
    to trash our rights, I was brought in for questioning once and kept
    for about 6hrs (Never Arrested, they just drilled me and my friend for
    6 hrs hoping they could get something on us..). 
    
    But Id prefer that the officer get brought up on charges for trashing
    someone's rights then the GUILTY person walking on a tech.
    
    I know awile back we talked about DRUG DEALERS/COLUMBIA/JUDGES getting
    murder, well if it wasnt so EASY for drug dealers to walk on tech's
    they wouldnt need to threating/kill judges.  Guilty people should go
    to Jail, if evidence is obtained Illegally then the Guily Officer(s)
    should be punished not the Victims by allowing the Guilty person to
    walk....
    
    I know this would require a rewrite of the constitution, and I agree
    that 10Guilty poeple on the street is better then 1 innocent man in
    jail, but this has nothing to do with Guilty people getting out on a
    tech.
    
    I was real close to some kids that were hurt by a deal.  3 kids charged
    with beating another kid, the kid who did the most damage was smart
    enough to turn himself in and ple a deal, he walked on probation the
    others went to jail.  1 was killed in jail, the other who was convicted
    of attempted murder (Knew Karate ?) served 11 years. This is how are
    justic system (Sometime) works, and how deals/tech let far too many
    GUILTY people walk....
    
    								mab
9.2153CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 13:548
I'd put forth the premise that most technicality's are caused by
someone's screwup, more than likely a cop.   Train the cops better
and the screwups go down.  No screwups, no technicality.....

Good point Tommy, about being just as dead....


'Saw
9.2154METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jul 08 1994 15:4219
I went to the source, and here is the scoop.
The constitution (original + Bill of Rights) did not make any distinction
between property owners and non-property owners. It does leave it up 
to the states to decide who votes for House and Senate. So back then the
STATES could (and some might have) have limited voting rights to property 
owners. 

The 14th amendment allowed all males over 21 to vote. It also states that
the number of representatives a state gets in the house depends on its
population of voters relative to the rest of the US. That means that if a
state limited who could vote they also got a smaller number of representatives.
This effectively made the states give the vote to all males over 21. Some
states then instituted things like exams and poll taxes to prevent blacks
from being able to vote, but not losing representation in the House. The
24th amendment got rid of those barriers.

The Crazy Met

9.2155CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 15:465
re .2154


	Well, Met, if you lose your job here I see some legal clerking
	in your future......8^)
9.2156CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingFri Jul 08 1994 16:4110
9.2157CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 16:469
9.2158MKFSA::LONGand the thunder roooooooolllls....Fri Jul 08 1994 16:4711
9.2159I'm still bitter about it...NAC::G_WAUGAMANInside de net! Inside de net!Fri Jul 08 1994 17:0112
> So back then the
> STATES could (and some might have) have limited voting rights to property 
> owners.                                                 
    
    That's basically what I said, Met, that the Founding Fathers had little
    regard for peon immigrant stock like the Waugamains, Philadelphia 1725, 
    who had no representation but could be and were clubbed over the head 
    and dragged off to jail with (almost) no justification...
    
    glenn
    
9.2160CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 17:0812
>    
>    That's basically what I said, Met, that the Founding Fathers had little
>    regard for peon immigrant stock like the Waugamains, Philadelphia 1725, 
>    who had no representation but could be and were clubbed over the head 
>    and dragged off to jail with (almost) no justification...
>    

Hey, just because them Philadelphians didn't like your great-great-great-great-
great grandfather's trick of resting a beer on your great-great-grea-great
grandfather's head doesn't mean you should be bitter....8^)
    

9.2161CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingFri Jul 08 1994 17:106
    Billl, my mistake.... 0.43 it is.
    
    Multiply .0043 x the population of the greater LA area and you know how
    many people *could* have a match.  
    
    Mark.
9.2162HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 08 1994 17:1129
RE                 <<< Note 9.2151 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>

>    Id like to know how VICTIMS of GUILTY MEN WHO WALKED ON TECH's Feel
>    on this matter.  

  There are none, it never happens. These men (and women) walked because the
police screwed up the evidence by violating the perpetrators constitutional
rights. How can you call your constitutional rights a technicality? 

>  ...This is how are
>    justice system (Sometime) works, and how deals/tech let far too many
>    GUILTY people walk....
    
  This is another myth. 

  In spite of the tough rules on evidence the number of people incarcerated is
increasing dramatically at a time when every jurisdiction in the country is
struggling to balance their budget. 

  In 1980 there were something like 350,000 people sitting in jails, prisons,
and houses of correction around the country. By 1990 that number was up to
600,000. It's pushing 1 million now and with all the truth in sentencing
regulations coming along it will not doubt go much higher. 

  It's the tax payers who pick up the bill for housing all of those people. We
do NOT need a system where still more people get put into prison. We just plain
can't afford it. 

  George
9.2163CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 17:177
It's too bad we can't make the prisoners who are there actually earn
their keep.  But if we did that, they'd complain that their rights are
being violated.....

If it were up to me, I'd just bring back the chain gangs.....8^)


9.2164HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 08 1994 17:2413
  It wouldn't be cost justified. Remember, most of them are unskilled labor and
difficult to control in a cell, never mind in a large work environment with
tools. 

  Add to that the fact that you'd be taking a job from the private sector and
giving it to someone who is state help. As with any state job the bureaucracy
needed to control these workers would go out of sight.

  No, it's cheaper to have them just sit there and do nothing.

  It's cheaper still to figure out a way to release the less violent offenders.

  George
9.2165CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 17:373
>  It's cheaper still to figure out a way to release the less violent offenders.

Ammunition is cheap....8^)
9.2166You did say *almost* nothing .... Haw!RHETT::KNORRUNIX Applications SupportFri Jul 08 1994 17:406
    So what crimes were your relatives Guilty of, Waugamain?
    
    Inquiring minds and all ....
    
    
    - ACC Chris
9.2167CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 17:4123
>  Add to that the fact that you'd be taking a job from the private sector and
>giving it to someone who is state help. As with any state job the bureaucracy
>needed to control these workers would go out of sight.

Well, yes and no, I think.

I look at things like patching holes on highways.  Around here, there's not
enough town money in most of the towns to get all the patching done in 
anything resembling a timely manner.  In fact, a couple of towns just
throw up "road under construction" signs on all the roads leading into
town to limit their liability, and leave the holes till they can get to 
them.

It don't take a lot of skill to do that (I know, cause I've done it), and
there aren't any openings anyway.  So let the guys doing time come
out on a chain gang and patch 'em up.  

They actually had a program going like that in a town in Western Mass I think
and while it was controversial, it was working.   Granted, that was at
a town level, but it could work....


'Saw
9.2168Ever hear of Shay's rebellion, Crisp? ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANInside de net! Inside de net!Fri Jul 08 1994 17:521
    
9.2169DZIGN::ROBICHAUDThe Wind Cries MaryFri Jul 08 1994 17:543
    	At least they fought for something worthwhile Glenn (i.e. whiskey).
    
    				  /Don
9.2170HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 08 1994 18:0135
RE                <<< Note 9.2167 by CAMONE::WAY "Pop quiz..." >>>

>I look at things like patching holes on highways.  Around here, there's not
>enough town money in most of the towns to get all the patching done in 
>anything resembling a timely manner.  

  It wouldn't work. Think of the costs involved.

  To patch holes in a highway you probably need 4 guys, an engineer or foreman
who can figure out how to do it, a couple guys to drive the truck and work the
shovels and a cop to direct traffic. 

  Now how many guys would it take to get violent prisoners armed with shovels
to fill in the holes?

  You still need the guy who knows how it's done. He probably needs a non
prison assistant to help him prepare the stuff and drive the truck and you
still need a cop to direct traffic. Ok, you've saved one guy. 

  Now because the prisoners are outside (2 per crew?) you probably need at
least two guards with them full time. That's a 1:1 ratio of guards to
prisoners. Then there's a prison van and someone to drive it, staff workers at
the town and at the prisons to figure out where to send the prisoners, someone
to bring them food, an extra cop to keep the civilians away from the prisoners
and possibly medical personal because of restrictions on men in captivity
being in a non-controled location.

  And we haven't even started adding the lawyers involved when the teamsters
union get's wind of the fact that prisoners are taking away someone's job.

  Let's see, instead of 4 guys to fill holes and not counting the prisoners
themselves I count 10-12 people including lawyers and paramedics to fill your
potholes. 

  George
9.2171mes apologies, Kinky Friedman made me do itAKOCOA::BREENFri Jul 08 1994 18:066
    Since it's going to go on for years how about an OJ Simpson Trial note?
    
    btw  If only OJ had the lawyer who saved the guy on the sodomy charge
    
    
    got it reduced to following to closely
9.2172They di in GASAHQ::ZOGRANFri Jul 08 1994 18:068
    Here in beautiful Georgia they use prisoners to clean up trash on the
    roadways and do some light construction.  Ususally 8 -10 guys, a prison
    bus and a shotgun totin' guard.
    
    FWIW
    
    UMDan
    
9.2173CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingFri Jul 08 1994 18:1112
    Pretty graphic testimony in progress from the medical examiner who
    conducted the autopsy.  Camera pans of OJ show a man not having a good
    day.
    
    FF warning for the squeamish...
    
    The infamous neck wound on Nicole Simpson was 8.5" long and 2.5" wide,
    from the base of the neck in the front to the tip of the right ear
    lobe.  Her neck was severed clean through to the spinal column.
    
    Mark.
    
9.2174Back to the normally scheduled programOLD1S::SYSTEMFri Jul 08 1994 18:279
	In Texas they make most work on farms growing the food they eat,along
with making license plates. Prison farms dot the counties in around the Max
in Huntsville. I lived near a farm in Sugarland outside of Houston. They
also raise the beef ,pork and poultry they eat.  The farm guards set on horses
with 30-30's and six shooters on the hip, some carry a sawed off 20 gauge for
persuader. 

 Cadzilla2
9.2175CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 18:3221
Okay, a few things.

Let's try to move the OJ stuff to the jurisprudence note.   Just post
your replies there instead of here...


re chain gangs and stuff, just a couple of points ---
		

		o down here, municipal work like that in most
		  towns is not union

		o they did it in Mass, they do it in Ga.

		o I'd settle for the "prison farm" concept.



NFL related:

	Giants are gonna suck this year.....8^)
9.2176Just don't let Simms sign with the 'SkinsSAHQ::ZOGRANFri Jul 08 1994 18:474
    Why is this year any different than any other year for the NJ Giants?
    :-)
    
    UMDan
9.2177CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 18:5317
>                 -< Just don't let Simms sign with the 'Skins >-
>
>    Why is this year any different than any other year for the NJ Giants?
>    :-)

Do me, you TWERP.

    
The Foreskins haven't had a decent QB since Sonny Jurgenson, and even
he sucked.   Rypien couldn't carry Simms jock on a good day, and 
I'll never ever forget that wonderful feeling as Jay Schroeder swooned
after the Giants defense kicked the sh*t outta him in 86 in the 
championship game.....


Actually, the problem with the Giants this season is their coach.....
The Field Goal Coach (TFGC) Dan Reeves....
9.2178CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 18:547
Sorry, UMDan, I forgot to put the 8^)'s in my note.  They were most
definitely implied, even if I don't always use them...(like Tommy)


8^)

'Saw
9.2179CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Fri Jul 08 1994 19:008
    
|The Foreskins haven't had a decent QB since Sonny Jurgenson, and even
|he sucked.   Rypien couldn't carry Simms jock on a good day, and 

Sonny was a good QB.  He had a great arm, but was definitly on the 
MisterPotatoHaid scale for speed/quickness.

Billy Kilmer, on the other hand, sipped.
9.2180Jack Kent Cooke will get you!SAHQ::ZOGRANFri Jul 08 1994 19:038
    Sort of figured that you either forgot em (8^)), or you were just
    having a bad day, or that you realize that the 'Skins will rise from
    the ashes and smoke de Giants this season!:-)
    
    Wait til 9/18 @4:00pm
    
    UMDan
    
9.2182CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Fri Jul 08 1994 19:124
Nit:

If memory serves me, Kilmer played QB on the George Allen teams.  He stepped in
when Sonny got too old and fat.  Theisman came after Kilmer, I beleive.
9.2183MKFSA::LONGand the thunder roooooooolllls....Fri Jul 08 1994 19:199
	Well, shiver me timbers!  There's actually NFL talk goin' on here!

	I don't see anyone being heads and shoulders above any other team
	this year.  Specially since the Cowboys have scattered in the wind.

	Should see lots of .500 teams in the 'offs.


	billl
9.2184CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 19:2415
UMDan (I'm so tempted to use the TWERP comment!)  8^)

Yeah, I forgot them.  It usually takes a lot to get me all in a huff, and
it's been rare in SPORTS that that happens, although Tommy does tempt me
sometimes....


Theismann was pretty good....


Simms, if anything, is underrated, because he's never been overrated
inthe press.....


'saw
9.2185Simms is okaySAHQ::ZOGRANFri Jul 08 1994 19:3413
    My note regarding Simms was partly in jest.  I realyy wouldn't mind
    seeing him on the 'Skins.  God knows he beat us enough.
    
    Regarding .500 teams in the playoffs -
    
    At least Football will have a playoff (Baseball probably won't, but
    thats another topic no doubt)
    
    I wonder how long it will take for people (Owners in particluar) to
    realize that the cap ain't all thats it was cracked up to be.  IMO.
    
    UMDan
    
9.2186HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jul 08 1994 19:517
  Which teams should improve?

  Which teams should get worse?

  Who are the rookies to watch?

  George
9.2187"Why I Prefer Soccer", by Matt Bahr (hey, Mac's not here) ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANInside de net! Inside de net!Fri Jul 08 1994 19:5411
    
> Actually, the problem with the Giants this season is their coach.....
> The Field Goal Coach (TFGC) Dan Reeves....
    
    How does that differ from Bill Parcells, whose idea of the perfect game
    is 250 yards on the ground and a perfect FG conversion rate inside the
    40?  Who can ever forget Parcells' finest effort: Matt Bahr 15, San 
    Francisco 49ers 13.
    
    glenn
    
9.2188MKFSA::LONGand the thunder roooooooolllls....Fri Jul 08 1994 19:5810
>>    How does that differ from Bill Parcells, whose idea of the perfect game
>>    is 250 yards on the ground and a perfect FG conversion rate inside the
>>    40?  Who can ever forget Parcells' finest effort: Matt Bahr 15, San 
>>    Francisco 49ers 13.

	End result is the key, Glenn.  Parcell's team gets the 'W', and
	the 49ers get the 'L'.


	billl
9.2190SOLANA::MAY_BRone bourbon,one scotch, and one beerFri Jul 08 1994 20:095
    
    Theisman is one of the most overated QB's of all time.  LT is my
    favorite player just because of that one play on Monday night.
    
    brews
9.2191NAC::G_WAUGAMANInside de net! Inside de net!Fri Jul 08 1994 20:1317
    
    The point is, though, that Reeves did very well last year, far better
    than he had any business doing.  I never thought much of him when he
    was with the Broncos, but last year made me give pause.  We'll see how
    it goes in the future...
    
    However, in total seriousness, the NFL as a whole does need to address 
    the "field goal problem".  Looking at an individual team, you're only
    concerned about wins and losses, but overall as a sport you don't want 
    the game to continue to devolve into one of field goals just because
    that might have been a successful formula for a few teams.  I've heard 
    soccer supporters claim that if you just counted up the TDs on each 
    side, the game scores in the NFL are no higher than in soccer, and at
    least with last year's NFL that is absolutely correct...
    
    glenn
     
9.2193CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Fri Jul 08 1994 20:1311
Parcells beat Reeves, that's why.

Parcells offense FIT the conditions that he played in.  December in Giants
Stadium isn't time to be hanging out the pigskin.

But, to me the difference is that Parcells did whatever it took to win, 
whatever it took, and would go for it in big places.   Reeves doesn't strike
me that way at all.....


'Saw
9.2194No (8^)*'s here!!!!!PTOVAX::JACOBFri Jul 08 1994 20:1830
    
>>                <<< Note 9.2163 by CAMONE::WAY "Pop quiz..." >>>

>>It's too bad we can't make the prisoners who are there actually earn
>>their keep.  But if we did that, they'd complain that their rights are
>>being violated.....

>>If it were up to me, I'd just bring back the chain gangs.....8^)

    IMHO, we need to go back to when peoples loathed the thought of prison. 
    Back when the prison was not a freakin' hotel where some a$$hole could
    go after committing a heinous crime, get college educated at the
    taspayers expense, live in an air conditioned cell, watch CABLE tv, and
    eat our money for his f_ck up.
    
    Give em bread and water, make em smash rocks, only let them watch
    Richard Simmons reruns on the tube, turn on the heat in the summer, and
    the AC in the winter.  Remove the carpeting from their cells.
    
    MAke prison a deterrent.  If they riot fer better conditions, nuke
    them.
    
    Commit a crime, PAY for it with some ROUGH time.  And a big guy named
    BUBBA taking you fer his love slave.
    
    JaKe
    


    
9.2195:-)SAHQ::ZOGRANFri Jul 08 1994 20:194
    re .2190 - You are indeed a cold person, Brews.  Do you watch NASCAR
    events for the crashes?
    
    UMDan
9.2196right MikeyH?MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jul 08 1994 20:204
    yo JaKe, you forgot about making 'em only listen to Air Supply :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2198PTOVAX::JACOBFri Jul 08 1994 20:244
    Thanks fer reminding me, TCsomething.
    
    JaKe
    
9.2199Chip-shot field goal: most boring play in football4156::G_WAUGAMANInside de net! Inside de net!Fri Jul 08 1994 21:1531
>      As for the NFL, soccer people are really reaching with 
>      that one.
    
    This wasn't in some kind of a comparison of the games, just in response
    to the criticisms that there's too little scoring in soccer.  On that
    very narrow (and narrow-minded) criticism at least, the point is correct.
    There isn't that much scoring in the NFL, either.
    
    I'm not convinced that scoring in the NFL will continue to be as bad as
    last year, but there's no denying that the accuracy of FG kickers and
    the number of points they score has steadily risen in the last 20 years
    without relapse.  Factors that have contributed like artificial turf 
    and domed stadiums are not a phase.  I know I'm not pleased and I
    believe that this trend is for the worst.  I'd rather see teams play
    aggressively (and make defenses respond aggressively) and have to punt
    than see field goals.
    
    I favor a very simple, fundamental change to make a field goal
    worth 2 points as opposed to some contrivance that messes with the
    essence of play on the field.  However, this would be considered too
    radical to the league powers, who would rather tinker with the rules
    as they have over the years (just the thought of messing with the 
    scoring system would send Don Shula into apoplexy!).  But if you look 
    at what the TD-to-FG ratio has dwindled to, a FG just does not merit 
    3 points any longer (even the 2 points is conservative).  Currently, 
    it's so much easier to pick up two FGs to approximately offset a TD 
    than to take risks...
    
    glenn
    
9.2200On No, Not Richard Simmons againPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jul 08 1994 21:336
   re: .2194

   As usual, JaKe, you've got a way with words. Well said.

    Keith    

9.2201SOLANA::MAY_BRone bourbon,one scotch, and one beerFri Jul 08 1994 22:129
   >    If he's so overrated then why did they name the Theisman Trophy    
   > after him ?!!?!?
    
    Actually, Tommy, and I expect that you may know this, he named himself
    after the trophy.  He changed the pronounciation of his name in college
    from ThEEsman while at ND.  Two more reasons not to like him in that one
    sentence.
    
    brews
9.2202No more OJ, PLEASE!!!QUASER::JACKSONTAWelcome to the MachineSat Jul 09 1994 12:2015
      Reeves only did good last year because he walked into a run oriented
    offense that can run block.  He never had that in Denver and never did
    anything to improve that.
    
      Watch him over the next few years and see if he screws up the jints
    OL.  I'm not sure what control he has over the draft and FA, but if he
    has most of the say so, then he will find a way to mess thing up.
    
      Camps open up over the next 2 weeks!!!
    
      I'm looking forward to my beloved Donks to score some big points this
    year.  I'm not looking forward to watching them give up big points this
    year.
    
      Tim
9.2203Camp OpensDELNI::FORGETMon Jul 11 1994 12:5215
    
    
    
    Back to our regularly scheduled Conference on the NFL
    
    
    LA Raiders & Rams open Rookie Camp yesterday.
    
    Jimmy Jonhson turned down Buddy Ryan offer as a defense coach
    
    Phil Simms is supposed to announce his retirement this week
    
    O.J. Simspon deserves his own topic, he's no longer part of the NFL
    
    Mike
9.2204CAMONE::WAYPop quiz...Mon Jul 11 1994 13:0934
re the last few:


	Glenn, I know what you mean about the FG.  It can make for
	some exciting finishes sometimes (like the Daluiso shot against
	the Cards last year) but too often it's the safe way out
	for coaches like Reeves.

	In rugby a couple of years ago, they changed the scoring because
	with a converted try being worth 6 points and a penalty kick
	(sort of a FG) being worth 3, it was too easy for teams to 
	play it safe and go for the tie, instead of attempting to work
	hard to score the try.   They changed a converted try to 7 points
	and it made some incentive.  I don't know what they can do
	similarly in the NFL with scoring.


regarding Reeves:

	No, Tommy, you're wrong.  I never liked Reeves when he was with
	the Broncos and I didn't like it when they brought him in.
	Thank George Young for that fiasco.  Reeves is pretty ineffective
	in situations where you need him to be -- ie playoffs last year.

	Last year he brought a highly undisciplined team into order
	and they performed, but not well.  There were flashes of
	ineptitude all over the place.

	Personally, I think George Young is more of a detriment to
	the Giants than Reeves, since George outlived his usefulness
	long ago......


'Saw
9.2205HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Mon Jul 11 1994 13:132
    Giant-Jets game is 20-AUG...
    
9.2206METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Jul 11 1994 14:407
> LA Raiders & Rams open Rookie Camp yesterday.

gag! we're not even half way through July. truly sick.

The Crazy Met

9.2207HANNAH::ASHEGonna bang some heads...Mon Jul 11 1994 15:202
    Exhibition games start end of the month, right?
    
9.220920 more days till footballOURGNG::RIGGENBP says wampum from quantum good dealMon Jul 11 1994 16:057
July 31, 1994 in Barcelona Spain 


Denver Bronco's          Against            Los Angeles Raiders


Jeff
9.2210HANNAH::ASHEGonna bang some heads...Mon Jul 11 1994 16:492
    What was the score in that Fog game last year?  Wasn't that 6-0 or 6-3?
    
9.2211MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Jul 11 1994 17:2011
9.2212when my next vacation?CNTROL::CHILDSLet Love Have It's WayTue Jul 12 1994 17:5115
 Tommy and Glenn, please check last year's Giants' schedule before tooting
 Reeves' horn. Toss in the fact that traditional tough divisional rivals
 Redskins and Eagles were abysmal and I think you'll find that dannyboy
 was less than brillant.

 While I was never a big Parcells' booster as Saw said atleast the man had
 the 'nads to gamble and play to his strength (ie: Between the tackles).

 I'll bet my last buck that the first play from scrimmage this year will
 be an endsweep.......

 Also Parcells had a sense of humor. Reeves doesn't have one and is whinner.

 mike
9.2213Reeves is a GENIUS!DZIGN::ROBICHAUDThe Wind Cries MaryWed Jul 13 1994 15:261
    
9.2214PackersBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredThu Jul 14 1994 19:396

	Brett Favre re-signed with the Pack for $19M over 5 years.
	I thought this guy was just a flash in the pan?

	Kevin
9.2215METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jul 14 1994 19:404
any of that money guaranteed??

The Crazy Met

9.2216MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Thu Jul 14 1994 19:476
    I doubt it.  The NFL isn't into guaranteed money like baseball.

    Farve had a good season 2 years ago, but slipped last year.  That's
    a pretty big contract for someone with questionable consistency.

    Mike
9.2217METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jul 14 1994 19:509
> The NFL isn't into guaranteed money like baseball.

agreed.

Now that there is free agency I wonder if this will start to change.

The Crazy Met

9.2218CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Thu Jul 14 1994 20:083
    Ala Scott Mitchell...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
9.2219CNTROL::CHILDSLet Love Have It's WayFri Jul 15 1994 12:285
 Bret slipped last year because he made dumb mistakes not because he lacked
 talent. As Chip said as a starting qb he got the going rate.........

 mike
9.2220Donks will lose to faids again\QUASER::JACKSONTAWelcome to the MachineFri Jul 15 1994 23:136
    re-1 MikeC
      
     Reeves was running end around onj 1st and 10?  In Denver it was always
    up the middle.  How about that shovel pass?
    
      Tim
9.2221CNTROL::CHILDSLet Love Have It's WayMon Jul 18 1994 12:475
 yeah Tim, the sweep was his favorite play. A few shovel passes but not as
 many as in Denver.

 mike
9.2222Curtis DuncanSTRATA::BARBIERIMon Jul 25 1994 16:077
      The Packers signed Curtis Duncan, WR out of Houston over the
      weekend.  How good is he.  Is he an adequate complement to
      Sharpe?  I really don't know a lot about him.
    
      The Pack is looking really good to me though!
    
                                                   Tony
9.2223CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Mon Jul 25 1994 17:2612
|      The Pack is looking really good to me though!

I dunno.  I'd love to see them in the 'offs again, but I have concerns about 
the offense.  The lack of a running game will expose Brett Farve's weakness
(his decisions in passign situations).

Meanwhile, Minnesota got a real QB, and Detroit looks better, if for no other 
reason than they will have only one first string QB.

But I'll be optimistic too.

=Bob=
9.2224Should be a deffinate PLUSMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Jul 25 1994 19:347
    Curtis Duncan was coming along AWSOMELY with Houston a few years back.
    He was coming along great, then got injured, when they wernt sure about
    him coming back they grabbed slaughter.  So with
    Givins/Jeffreis/Slaughter they didnt start/play duncan too much.  But
    he should be able to help GB alot...
    
    								MaB
9.2225Running Game Looks Better On PaperSTRATA::BARBIERITue Jul 26 1994 17:0612
      re: .2223
    
      I think the running game will be improved.  The Pack was
      ravaged at O-line last year.  This year, they have acquired
      Guy McIntyre and a couple others.  Of course, it would be
      nice if Aaron Taylor hadn't got injured (the 1st round draft
      choice).  Also, the Pack acquired Reggie Cobb from Tampa
      Bay and LeShon Johnson in the draft.
    
      I think the running game will be noticeably improved.
    
                                                   Tony
9.2226MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Jul 26 1994 17:2215
    man TB is in trouble, they lose cobb, Dilfer may go back to college
    and Ericc Rhett is a holdout (Still)... Chock up a couple easy wins
    for the NFC Central Teams.
    
    The Central will be a very intresting division.  Theyve had 3
    competative (Playoff Race) teams in Detroit/Minny/GB all 3 teams
    seemed to have improved. Detroit added a QB, they have solid WR's and
    an awsome RB.  Minny Added Moon, cant get a much better QB then that
    although the WR's are suspect (and the running game).  And GB appears
    to have improved the most.  Chicago and TB could be in trouble this
    season.  The NFC West would appear to have steeped down a notch, maybe
    You have NYG, DAL and Wash losing key players and phoenix/philly could
    be the new teams in the east...Hey maybe the AFC will win one..
    
    								MaB
9.2227USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jul 26 1994 19:1032
re:  NFC West

I think Atlanta has made some improvements during the off-season, so they
have the potential for contending for a wildcard spot.  But they also have
a new coach, new QB, and only 1 returning WR in a 4-WR offense.

The NFC playoff contenders are probably:

	East:		Dallas,  Phoenix,  Philly (because of Kotite)

	Central:	GB,  Detroit,  Minnesota

	West:		SF,  Atlanta

I think Dallas and SF will win their divisions, and Phoenix will be the
best 2nd-place team.  That leaves a real dog-fight for the Central crown,
and the other 2 wildcard spots.


The AFC power appears to be in the West, with KC, Denver and the Raiders
all legitimate Super Bowl teams.  I think Buffalo will make the playoffs,
but if Marino is healthy, Miami could unseat them at the top of the East.
Throw out Cincinati, and the Central is a 'pick-em'.  Who knows what to
expect out of Houston, with a new QB and new offense.

In the AFC:

	East:		Miami,  Buffalo,  Jets,  Pats ?

	Central:	Pitts,  Houston,  Cleveland

	West:		Denver,  Raiders,  KC
9.2228PTOVAX::SCHRAMMWed Jul 27 1994 15:597
    
    FWIW (and this is probably the kiss of death) Pittsburgh was predicted
    second (behind KC) as the AFC team most likely to go to the Super Bowl.
    Even without that prediction (and depending on injuries), the AFC
    Central is a fight between Pittsburgh and Cleveland.  Free agency,
    trades and coaching changes makes Houston questionable and Cincinnatti
    - give them 2 years. 
9.2229PTOVAX::JACOBThu Jul 28 1994 19:4514
    
    >>Central is a fight between Pittsburgh and Cleveland.  Free agency,
    
    This may come backl to haunt me, but, barring the STEELERS getting
    riddled with injuries, I don't see Clevescum giving the STEELERS much
    fight this year fer the AFC Central.  The Brown(spot)s(tm) are a 8-8
    team or worse.  The STEELERS should finish at 10-6 or better.
    
    I'll eat my crow if I have to(and I'm still here) in January.
    
    But, I don't think I'll have to.
    
    JaKe
    
9.2230ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Jul 28 1994 19:5117
    
    (Note: spellings corrected.  B^)
    
>    This may come back to haunt me, but, barring the Steelers getting
>    riddled with injuries, I don't see Cleveland giving the Steelers much
>    fight this year for the AFC Central.  The Browns are an 8-8
>    team or worse.  The Steelers should finish at 10-6 or better.
    
    I hate to say, but I agree with you w.r.t. the Browns - IMHO they
    are going _nowhere_ while Belichek's still there.  I hope I'm
    wrong, or at least that Belichek leaves quickly...
    
    I'm not so certain the Steelers are a lock to get 10 wins, either,
    though.
    
    Joe
    
9.2231AFC Central...Very Weak!!STRATA::BARBIERIFri Jul 29 1994 12:503
      Come to think of it, has any division EVER been as weak as
      the AFC Central in terms of how good the quarterbacks are?
      In fact, who are the running backs?  What a weak division!!
9.2232MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jul 29 1994 14:395
    Well, not in football, but the AL West this year sure ranks right up
    there.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2233Worst of the worstOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Fri Jul 29 1994 14:492
    The National League Worst is almost as bad as the AL Worst. Each have
    four losing teams. The AL "wins" because of California and Seattle.
9.2234MKFSA::LONGgot some ocean front property in ArizonaFri Jul 29 1994 15:164
	AL West, NFC West, what's the difference, they both sip.


	billl
9.2235BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Aug 09 1994 13:166

	Deon Sanders spent the night in the pokie after allegedly dragging
	a cop 20 feet on his mototcycle.

	Kevin
9.2236it was his 27th birthday tooFRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Aug 09 1994 16:251
    
9.2237Time for colleges to quit being pushed around by prosAKOCOA::BREENWed Aug 10 1994 20:0016
    I'm surprised the colleges don't simply take the bull by the horns and
    sign players to four year contracts which can then be resold at a
    profit to the nfl, somewhat similar to what minor league teams did
    before the reserve clause and depression allowed major leagues to put
    independent minor league owners out of business.
    
    But colleges are to big to be pushed around and could justify signings
    as being best for all around (the money out of drew bledsoes pocket
    would go to a 5th or 6th (equivelent, there'd be no such thing as a
    draft, rather the other way around) round player.
    
    And the profits would go into music, arts, women's sports and signings
    could pay tuitions/scholarships.
    
    George will obviously agree with this, what's wrong other than the
    obvious puncturing of some prides and putting agents out of business.
9.2239HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Aug 10 1994 20:233
  What's the advantage to the player?

  George
9.2240Big question is will college fans support non-amateur statusAKOCOA::BREENWed Aug 10 1994 21:1535
    As you say Tommy there's enough corruption in college today to risk
    more or less but this (new) "corruption" would be above the table.
    
    The player would get whatever amount of college he wanted free while
    matriculating; he would have to attend 10-15 hours of class per week
    but could audit.  He would receive a combination of base and merit pay
    the latter rewarded on performance and output.
    
    The players advantage would be he would be paid honestly while
    attending college "free".
    
    He would have true leverage in terms of a percentage of the amount of
    his contract bought by the professional club.  HE WOULD BE A FREE AGENT
    at the end of the contract unless the contract was bought out by the
    pro club.
    
    Length of contract: 5 years from date of hs grad./18th birthday
    
    Again: the agents would be locked out until the point of contract
    expiration/contract buyout.
    
    The complicated part is the method by which players select
    colleges/vv(?) and colleges deal with pro teams.
    
    Players benefit because they are now represented in any player-owner
    contracts by default by the colleges who have an incentive (or at least
    an interest).
    
    The Drew Bledsoes might have to wait until they have proven themselves
    before reaping big bucks but since they are free-agents (> 5 yrs totally )
    they'll reap even bigger bucksj.
    
    Most hurt will be the Eugene Chungs whose overpricing at draft time
    forces their teams to do on the job training to get their money back at
    the expense of better players.
9.2241HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Aug 11 1994 14:2226
RE                      <<< Note 9.2240 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    The players advantage would be he would be paid honestly while
>    attending college "free".

  About the only thing different is the "honestly". They are already "paid" and
receive a free education. And if they get caught it's the school that pays any
penalties (suspension what ever) not the player.
    
>    Players benefit because they are now represented in any player-owner
>    contracts by default by the colleges who have an incentive (or at least
>    an interest).
    
  They are better off with an agent. The agent profits by acting on behalf of
the player and if they don't do that the player can fire the agent and hire a
different one. The player is worse off if they are represented by a college that
will be acting on their own behalf. 

  The big problem here is that the pro-college crowd will hate the idea since
it takes away the "purity" of college sports (what ever that means) and the
athletes won't like it because they don't really benefit. 

  On the plus side, this idea is bound to be so unpopular that it can't be
all bad. :*)}

  George
9.2243HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Aug 11 1994 15:1520
  Ok Tommy, you're right. Since I don't have the numbers handy that proves
that in the "pure" world of college sports, football players never get perks
that the average EE major doesn't get. Life on campus for the Quarterback
is no different from some kid working his way through trying to get a degree
in Business Administration or Math.

  It's all just those fine young men playing for honor, for their country,
and for their school ... wait, I'm choking up ... I'm misting ... 

 "Bright College years we sing to thee,
  Those golden years that quickly flee,
  Bright shinning moments of our youth,
  Were we can seek, the truth.

  May what we learned through toil and strife
  Direct our foot steps and our life
  No man can ask for more than this
  We sing to thee, Ol' Miss..."

  George
9.2245the plan (continued)AKOCOA::BREENThu Aug 11 1994 16:0138
    Tommy,
    	Wherever you get a situation where an athlete is worth thousands of
    dollars to play for an institution and is supposed to be getting nada
    then the chances are some money is going to change hands.  I would
    agree that Foley and even Flutie who was worth millions to BC received
    nothing illegal.
    
    	Anecdotal evidence of payouts such as the Dave Megyesey (sic) book
    don't seem to be as prevalent today as yesteryear.  Does that mean the
    money isn't there - I sincerely doubt it.
    
    	But one thing is certain. It would be very difficult for college
    institutions to come out of the closet and become full fledged
    professional sports businesses (de jure as opposed to de facto).
    
    	But players do sign contracts today (letter of intent, ncaa
    agreement to abide by rules), colleges act as minor league for
    basketball and baseball for nada (except for pros allowing colleges to
    do the initial freshman signings), players have no input on where they
    will work after college if they choose to continue with there sport as a
    professional, cream of the crop gets most of the draft money; lower
    rounds basically get screwed...(and on and on)
    
    	My basic point was that a college would own a signed contract to
    play football for a salary which would have to be bought out while in
    force by the professional team(s) selected by the player to participate
    in the AUCTION of the contract.  The buyout price goes mainly to the
    player with a cut to the college but for seniors it would be a one year
    contract.  Unless renogotiated that buyout price would cover the
    players pro salary (the "cream" would all renegotiate thru agents with
    essentially the same rights they have today (play or sit at home - how
    did Buddy Ryan put it to Miller the other day?)
    
    	If the nfl still chose to draft contracted players the college
    would simply ignore it and if owners colluded against the system the
    ncaa would blow their doors off in court.
    
    billthe
9.2246HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Aug 11 1994 16:4633
RE        <<< Note 9.2244 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>    Go back and read the testimony, George. Nobody said that the world of 
>    college sport was "pure". 

  I've heard many people talk about how college and amateur sport was better
than professional sport because it was "somehow more pure". No one could ever
define "somehow". 

>However, you did say (again) that all college 
>    athletes are paid. Of course, you have no proof. 
    
    No, I said that college football players are paid. I never suggested that
the guys that play the less popular sports are paid. And they are paid, what do
you think a sports scholarship is? If you agree to go play football for a
school with an aggressive football program you don't pay to go to school, they
pay all your bills and give you a free ride.

>Your dislike for college 
>    athletics is enough for you to make such blanket statements.

  I don't dislike college sports, they are fine. I dislike hypocrisy. College
basketball and college football is minor league basketball and football for the
NBA and NFL respectively. It is not something that is just there for the
enjoyment of the kids on campus and it's not a typical college activity who's
purpose is to build character.

  It's purpose is to make money and feed players into the pros and that's fine.
That being the case, many of the rules are outdated. Why penalize teams for
acting like professional teams that have little to do with the average kid
on campus when that's clearly what they are?

  George
9.2248Only 1 night of baseball left :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Aug 11 1994 17:0525
    A FULL FOOTBALL SCHOLERSHIP CAN BE Tuition, Housing, Books, Food etc
    
    IF you add that all up Im sure 30-50K per year is quite possible
    Id say thats getting paid, and this is just the Legal part of it
    there's alot of Illegal funds/favors that switch hands and if you
    think otherwise were talking BIG TIME lack of common sense.
    
    Lets take this one step further, someone brought up Doug Flutie.
    BC made Upteen Millions off of flutie from football revenues, but what
    did Doug Make off of BC... EVERYTHING HE HAS.  Let's say Doug doesnt
    get a Football Scholership and plays QB for some jr college, does he
    get drafted in the NFL, maybe but not that high, therefore without the
    big name/contract he proberbly doesnt make the team (This statement of
    course based on his accomplishment in the NFL).
    
    So without BC more the likly no NFL, no CFL, no $$$$.  He's made more
    off BC then BC made off him... Plus he got an education (I hope) for
    free, whats the current price tag for 4 years at BC (everything
    included tuition/housing/books/food etc) ???
    
    Id have to agree with George, they get paid, ask any father trying to
    send his non athletic child to a big time school and they will surely
    agree...
    
    								mab
9.2249HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Aug 11 1994 17:1025
RE        <<< Note 9.2247 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>       They are already paid *AND* receive a free education. Note the "and".
>       "And" meaning "in addition to".

  This reminds me of a story I heard about when the army 1st started trying to
communicate with computers. A general had his flunky type in a question asking

  >Are they coming by land or sea.

The response of course was

  :YES
  
  >Yes what?

  :YES SIR.

>       You say this quite often completely ignoring that 98% of all college
>       athletes go on to careers other than pro sports. 

  So big deal, most guys playing A ball go on to careers other than the Major
Leagues. That's the nature of any minor league including college sports.

  George
9.2251HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Aug 11 1994 20:4210
RE        <<< Note 9.2250 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>    It's also BC and UConn and California and Stan-
>    ford and some other very fine institutions that don't "pay" their athletes
>    anything. Unless you have proof that they do. I'm sure you don't just your
>    own little agenda.
    
  These colleges have no sports scholorships?

  George
9.2253lookin goodHBAHBA::HAASSorry, wrong species.Mon Aug 22 1994 15:1012
Lasted night Dallas looked like it was telling the rest of the league
that they're looking for the three pete (with no royalties to no one).

Basically, the bludgeoned Denver into submission with their opening
possessions: 2 drives, 14 points and kept the ball for about a full
quarter.

Denver showed off its new highlight, Anthony Miller, who scored on a
blown assignment. Other than that it was a total bust for the Broncos.
The defense looked helpless againt Aikman, Smith, Novacek, Irvin, etc.

TTom
9.2254CAMONE::WAYTell my friend boy, Willie BrownMon Aug 22 1994 17:198
>The defense looked helpless againt Aikman, Smith, Novacek, Irvin, etc.


That must be Collie-Lover Dan Reeves' legacy.  The Giant defense looked like
a sieve on Saturday night.


'Saw
9.2256good and badHBAHBA::HAASSorry, wrong species.Mon Aug 22 1994 17:2512
So far, Denver and Atlanta look like they have exceptionally bad
defenses when you consider what they're giving up in terms of points.

Other teams that seem to be stinkin up the place are Cincinnati,
Washington, and the LA Rams, all of whom are winless so far. San Diego is
giving up 25+ points per game.

I think we got a trend here in the NFL: a couple of good teams - Dallas,
San Francisco (any body else?) - and the rest of the league trying to get
into a good draft pick position.

TTom
9.2257SOLANA::MAY_BRQUIET--case study in progressMon Aug 22 1994 17:349
     
    << Note 9.2255 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
    
   > ...That whole Harding-Kerrigan fiasco was Dan's doing. It's not the 
    
    
    NO Tommy, that was Ray Handley's fault.
    
    brews
9.2258why they suckHBAHBA::HAASSorry, wrong species.Mon Aug 22 1994 17:4113
Top 10 reasons for why Denver's D sucks:

10. Dan Reeves
 9. Big Bad John Elway
 8. Mr T
 7. Rush Limbaugh
 6. Bill Clinton
 5. Dikembe Mutombo
 4. Automated baggage handling system
 3. Charley Waters
 2. Aerosmith

 1. Joey Buttafuco
9.2259ELMAGO::BENBACANo QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque!Mon Aug 22 1994 18:531
    Another reason, cain't  play below 5000 ft
9.2260CAMONE::WAYTell my friend boy, Willie BrownMon Aug 22 1994 19:1513
>      Of course it's Reeves' fault. The rampant inflation in Brazil is
>      Reeves' fault, too. That whole Harding-Kerrigan fiasco was Dan's
>      doing. It's not the defensive coordinator's fault or the defensive
>      players themselves that are to blame for a poor effort, it's big Dan. 
>      Especially in Denver when he hasn't coached them in three years.
>      It must be nice to have an all-occasion whipping boy.


Sorry Tommy.

I didn't want to have to tell you this, but I just usually blame you
for those things you mentioned.....

9.2261Question ?WMOIS::BALL_KThu Aug 25 1994 12:3812
     Is there a Football or Patriot notes file some where ?                                  
    
    
 >>  .Case in point, our beloved UMass, a national power for the
 >>   last half dozen or so years that hasn't produced one NBA player
    
    Not to nit-pick but UMASS has only been a "national power" for 3 years
    (4 if you really wanna stretch and include the year we made to
    the NIT). We'll probably start producing them next year when Loe Roe 
    graduates  
    
    
9.2263PTOVAX::JACOBThu Aug 25 1994 19:185
    there also is a football conference at STKCSC::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL
    
    
    JaKe
    
9.2264thanks for the infoWMOIS::BALL_KFri Aug 26 1994 12:0610
    
    
   >    I like Lou but he's going to catch hell trying to make it
   >    in the NBA. He does a lot of things well but no one part-
   >    icular thing exceptionally much like Harper Williams. I
   
    
    You may be right, but I think that Roe is built better to make the
    transition. He seems to have a small forward's body (even if he hasn't
    spent any time there), whereas Harper was built like a short center/PF. 
9.2265No baseball = so what!QUASER::JACKSONTAChapter 11?Mon Aug 29 1994 19:184
      Finally, another real man's sport starts this coming labor day
    weekend!!!
    
      Tim
9.226630008::ROBICHAUDFootball &gt; BaseballMon Aug 29 1994 19:254
    Super Bowl will be either the Cowboys or 49ers from the NFC and
    either the Bills or Steelers from the AFC.
    
    				   /Don
9.2267MKFSA::LONGIt ain't over til it's over, maybeMon Aug 29 1994 19:504
	Thanks for the pre-emptive KOD, Flusher!


	billl
9.2268Entire Schedule ?LUNER::GROVESTue Aug 30 1994 12:424
    
    Is there an entire NFL schedule in this Notes File ?
    
       Jim
9.2269PTOVAX::JACOBTue Aug 30 1994 19:455
    You cain find a complete schedule in SWECSC::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL in note
    # 464.*, each week is a reply in that note.
    
    JaKE
    
9.2270MKFSA::LONGIt ain't over til it's over, maybeWed Aug 31 1994 16:374
	So I guess we just send our KOH picks to Chappy?


	billl
9.2271YANKEES 1994 COULD HAVE BEENSWMOIS::FASSETT_ENothing beats a Bud MAN!!!Wed Aug 31 1994 19:385
    I second that motion, Chappy deserves to run the KOH, to keep his mind
    off of the fact that his Yankees are not going to the playoffs, and
    they won't be playing any World Series games,(not that I think they
    would have made it to the series anyway).
    FAST EDDIE
9.2272METSNY::francusBaseball in 94? 95? :-( Wed Aug 31 1994 19:447
au contraire. we wouldn't want to do anything which would keep Chappy's
mind off the fact that his Yankees are not going to the playoffs. Heck
that is the only silver (well maybe bronze) lining that the baseball
strike has.

The Crazy Met

9.2273USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Aug 31 1994 20:165
re:   last couple

You guys better keep praying.  No way this season (and all that TV money)
are going down the toilet.  You'll have to sweat-out the Yankees' post-season
appearance, for sure...
9.2274INFO PLEASELUDWIG::GARRYDallas Cowboys shooting for 3-peatThu Sep 01 1994 18:346
    Does anyone have any info on an injury to Brian Blades of the Seahawks
    someone told me he is injured but I haven't seen or heard about it.
    Will he be playing sunday ??
    
    Thanks,
    Tom
9.2275AMERICAN_FOOTBALL Notes FileAYOV10::CAIRNSRadio Ass Kiss !! - On the Air !!Tue Sep 06 1994 14:082
Anybody know what;s happend to AMERICAN_FOOTBALL 

9.2276up and runningOLD1S::CADZILLA2I will make it workTue Sep 06 1994 14:472
    
    Still on-line I just finished reading it.
9.2277football conference?CSC32::J_HENSONand it's still too short!Tue Sep 06 1994 16:327
I can't get into american_football either.  When I try to open it,
the get an error telling me something like inappropriate device for
operation.  I use the file name STKCSC::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL.

Anyone else?

Jerry
9.2278CAM3::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 06 1994 16:3412
>Anyone else?
>
>Jerry


I just added the conference and tried opening it and got the same error.

That error would indicate a propblem on that system I think.....


'Saw

9.2279the node has changedSTRATA::GARRYDallas Cowboys shooting for 3-peatTue Sep 06 1994 16:553
    The Football note is now on SWECSC::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL
    
    Tom
9.2280ELMAGO::BENBACANo QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque!Tue Sep 06 1994 17:033
    Gee, I just added a reply there and didn't get an error and I haven't
    changed to the new node as of yet. I'll wait till  I get the error and
    then change.
9.228130008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Sep 06 1994 17:144
    	Looks like Dallas and San Francisco are the class of the league.
    Bet the NFC and over in the Super Bowl.
    
    				  /Don
9.2282HANNAH::ASHEBow down before the one you serve...Tue Sep 06 1994 18:445
    Whumph....
    
    That's the sound of someone we know officially falling off the Erler
    bandwagon so he can jump precariously onto the Viking one...
    
9.2283CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 06 1994 18:519
I just heard an updated report on Napolean McCallum (he went to Annapolis
right?)

He did severely dislocate his knee and he also damaged an artery.  They
are waiting for the swelling (pretty bad) to go down so that they can
do an MRI....


'Saw
9.2284MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Tue Sep 06 1994 18:589
>>    Whumph....
    
>>    That's the sound of someone we know officially falling off the Erler
>>    bandwagon so he can jump precariously onto the Viking one...

	I sure hope Dr 00:00 didn't McCallumize himself on that leap.


	billl
9.2285Turn Back The Clock GamesPENUTS::JST_ONGEJohn St.Onge USDSL DTN: 297-9527Tue Sep 13 1994 23:445
    Not sure if anyone's mentioned this, but I guess this coming weekend
    teams will be wearing uniforms from their past years.  The Cardinals
    will be using uniforms from when they were in Chicago etc.
    
    John
9.2286TNT Football SpecialODIXIE::ZOGRANWed Sep 14 1994 03:1211
    Just got through watching the TNT special on the 75 years of pro
    football.  Catch it if you can.  It was done by NFL Films, and has some
    great footage - Immaculate reception, Stablers 20 yard "fumble", the
    catch (SF vs 'Boys).  Interviews with old players (Sammy Baugh - "Been
    throwin forever.  How can you play an a go**amn team with somone who
    never threw a ball.  WHat the hell are they goin to teach me about
    throwin!"), Jim Brown running.  
    
    Not bad Tee Vee, all in all.
    
    UMDan
9.2287Fold up helmetsCSLALL::BRULEWho needs baseball? It's football timeWed Sep 14 1994 11:553
    RE.2285
    Will they be wearing the leather helmets too. That would be great!!!
    :^)
9.2288CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Wed Sep 14 1994 12:4413
Caught the show last night.

There is some EXCELLENT footage of early football, and lots of footage
through the years.  There are some things that come out that you might
not have heard before and stuff like that.  I enjoyed it.

Probably the most touching moment, for me, was when they had the guy from
the Canton Bulldogs at the Tampa Bay game, and all the players from the
Bucs were filing by him, introducing themselves...  Kind of like a
50 years later type thing.....


'Saw
9.2289Will it ever end???BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Sep 14 1994 14:516

	Geez, now the NFL refs are talking about strinking.  They want more $$$.


	Kevin
9.2290PTOVAX::JACOBWed Sep 14 1994 14:5310
    re.22889
    
    What is "strinking"???
    
    IS that a strike that they spend all their time drinking??
    
    What's they're major gripe, those funny looking uniforms????
    
    JaKe
    
9.2291BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Sep 14 1994 15:007

	Sure, JaKE, like you've never had a typo, you jerk!

	:-)

	Kevin
9.2292PTOVAX::JACOBWed Sep 14 1994 15:058
    
    >>	Sure, JaKE, like you've never had a typo, you jerk!
    
    That's "Mr. jerk", to you.
    
    JaKe
    (8^)*
    
9.2293PENUTS::JST_ONGEJohn St.Onge USDSL DTN: 297-9527Wed Sep 14 1994 15:176
    Re: .2288
    
    Was that the guy who played four different games, all sixty minutes of
    each game, in four straight days under different names ?
    
    John
9.2294George Gipp, one of which was for Notre Dame?25022::BREENIt IS necessarily soWed Sep 14 1994 15:251
    
9.22951 year, $1.3MFRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Wed Sep 14 1994 17:211
    Neon Deon signs with the '49ers.
9.2296neon no showHBAHBA::HAASSorry, wrong species.Thu Sep 15 1994 13:0610
I heard Neon was a no-show at the press conference called to announce his
signing.

Supposedly, the 49ers did the ol' restructure others' contracts games,
including Ken Norton who, I'm sure wouldn't mind another ring.

Also, in keeping with the nostalgic spirit of thised weekend, the Cards
are going to start Jim McMahon, a relic in his own right.

TTom
9.2297At least I'll have one right...SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Thu Sep 15 1994 14:364
|Also, in keeping with the nostalgic spirit of thised weekend, the Cards
|are going to start Jim McMahon, a relic in his own right.

Sho' glad I took Cleveland in the KOH contest.
9.2298QUASER::JACKSONTANo more notes;-(Thu Sep 15 1994 15:448
      Deion wants to play for 9'rs because he's tired of Rice beating
    him...
    
      I thought he wanted like $2.5mil for this year?  I guess he wants a
    championchip in the NFL since he hasn't gotten one in the MLB.
    
      Tim
    
9.2299SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Thu Sep 15 1994 17:066
    
    	Plain and simple he might have wanted 2.5 million. None of the
    contenders he wants to play for has 2.5 under the cap. So if Deion
    wants to play, he'll have to settle for the 1.3.
    
    
9.2300snarfFRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Thu Sep 15 1994 17:251
    
9.2301unless he satisified with NFC West Champs RingCNTROL::CHILDSEverybody knows this is NowhereThu Sep 15 1994 20:582
 he signed with the wrong team if expects a ring........
9.2302MSE1::FRANCUSBaseball in 94? 95? :-( Fri Sep 16 1994 03:304
    He signed for 1.1 million
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2303WMOIS::COOK_TWhat ever happened to...Fri Sep 16 1994 13:296
    Re. last few...
    
    He also has ~750k in incentives in the contract.
    
    TC
    
9.2304CNTROL::CHILDSEverybody knows this is NowhereFri Sep 16 1994 13:346
 Sanders can't stop Emitt so I don't see where he's the difference. Stopping
 Irvin or Harper isn't the way to beat the boys. Madden didn't call him
 the best player in the game for nothin'......

 mike
9.2305go ninersCOMET::MARLANDFri Sep 16 1994 14:012
    Just because the 9ers lost 1 game doesn't mean they won't go to the 
    big game. It's no shame to lose in KC, lots of teams do.
9.2306CNTROL::CHILDSEverybody knows this is NowhereFri Sep 16 1994 14:079
>    Just because the 9ers lost 1 game doesn't mean they won't go to the 
>    big game. It's no shame to lose in KC, lots of teams do.

 true enough but if they have to face Dallas they won't go imo. I'd love
 to see them go if it came down to them or Dallas but they don't have
 the right temperment to beat the stinkyass cowboys.........

 mike
9.2307SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Sep 16 1994 17:307
Dion signed a 1 year contract with the Niners.  His thinking seems to be
that after a year (and possibly a ring), there will be a team that will 
make room under the cap to meet his price.  

The Niners are playing rent-a-db for the year.

=Bob=
9.230830008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaFri Sep 16 1994 19:453
    	It would be a riot if Deion went to the Cowboys next year.
    
    				   /Don
9.2309CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Mon Sep 19 1994 13:0510
Loved the old uniforms yesterday.

I especially liked the Giants 1956 version.  I like it better than today.

What year was the 'Skins jersey from?

And how bout the Pats in their old (better) unis!


'Saw
9.2310WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Mon Sep 19 1994 13:086
    
    
    Them Packer and Steeler Uni's were very ugly!!!
    
    
    Chap
9.2311HANNAH::ASHEGoofy's going to collegeMon Sep 19 1994 13:524
    I thought the Redskins were the best ones by far.  The Steelers were
    the worst, with the Bears not far behind.  Worst helmets - Bills and
    Jets who refused to go back to the white ones.... then the Broncos.
    
9.2312PTOS01::JACOBRFollically Challenged!!Mon Sep 19 1994 14:465
    Actually, I thought the STEELER uniforms were horrible, but the Packers
    were the worst.
    
    JaKe
    
9.2313SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Mon Sep 19 1994 14:5111
re: old unis

Missed "Sports Center" so I didn't see too many. Were 
the Broncos really wearing those ugly brown things with
the socks with verticle stripes?

Pack, Steelers and Bears were all pretty ugly.  I was 
bummed that the Dolphins didn't go back to the orange 
and white they wore their first year.

=Bob=
9.2314HANNAH::ASHEGoofy's going to collegeMon Sep 19 1994 15:115
    As Berman said, the Dolphins are now 18-0 in those '72 uniforms...
    
    The Broncos had the same basic color scheme, but the helmet was this
    blob resembling a bucking bronco.
    
9.2315ELMAGO::BENBACANo QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque!Mon Sep 19 1994 15:525
    From what I heard the Broncos didn't wear their inaugural uniforms with
    the vertical strips because they were to hard to make so they used a
    more recent rendition uniform.
    
     
9.2316FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Sep 19 1994 16:281
    Those USC Trojans played a great game against the Giants yesterday.
9.2317Keep the hatsVAOP28::RicetataMon Sep 19 1994 18:185
> Loved the old uniforms yesterday.

How about the refs hats? Cute. I think they should stay.

josh
9.2318MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Mon Sep 19 1994 18:347
    re ref's hats:
    
    Kinda looked like they arrived at the game in MGBs.  Very sporty!
    
    
    billl
    p.s.  Nice bowties, too!
9.2319Anybody see a Titelist-2? Is that stadium security???TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Sep 19 1994 18:5712
    
    
    
    >Kinda looked like they arrived at the game in MGBs.  Very sporty!
    
    
    	At first I thought they were a four-some, and one of them hooked
    his tee-shot over the stadium wall!
    
    JimH
    
    
9.2320CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Mon Sep 19 1994 19:172
I'm surprised they didn't make the refs in the AFC games wear the old
red/white stripes......8^)
9.2321QUASER::JACKSONTANo more notes;-(Mon Sep 19 1994 22:5910
      Did they use an old ball?
    
      Didn't the old balls (footballs) used to be brown & white?
    
      To bad they didn't go back to the old rules too.
    
      Offcourse that would mean they would be playing football.  Of course
    they woulda had to teardown the sissy domes...
    
      Tim
9.2322CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 20 1994 13:0612
Detroit beats Dallas last night in OT.

The uniforms were unbelievable -- the old Detroit ones, with the high
sox were kind of cool.  The Dallas ones were different, that's for sure.

Did Dallas use their modern helmets?


Walt, what year were the Detroit unis from?


'Saw
9.2323PTOS01::JACOBRFollically Challenged!!Tue Sep 20 1994 13:1315
>>          <<< Note 9.2322 by CAMONE::WAY "Pony Boy take me home..." >>>

>>Detroit beats Dallas last night in OT.

    LOVED IT!!!  JAson Hanson made it nail biting time for every Detroit
    fan lasted night every time he stepped on the field.
    
>>The uniforms were unbelievable -- the old Detroit ones, with the high
>>sox were kind of cool.  The Dallas ones were different, that's for sure.
    
    I thought both teams unis was just butt ugly. Not as ugly as the ones
    the STEELERS and the Packers wore Sunday, but ugly nevertheless.
    
    JaKe
    
9.2324CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 20 1994 13:4419
>    
>    I thought both teams unis was just butt ugly. Not as ugly as the ones
>    the STEELERS and the Packers wore Sunday, but ugly nevertheless.
>    


The interesting thing, to me, was that back then they didn't have the
choice of material, or the ability to use some of the colors that they
have today.

That "metallic blue" that the Lions normally wear either a) wasn't popular
back in the 50s or just wasn't possible.  

When we look back at the old colors, they don't seem good, but back then
it was probably all they had....


'Saw    

9.2325SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Sep 20 1994 14:5213
The Cowboys went half-assed on the old unis.  The fisted Cowboy uniforms were
great, they had the stars on the shoulders of the blue and white jersey, like 
they were wearing lasted night, but the helmets were white, with several blue 
stars on each side.

re: ugly unis

Yes, many of the old unis look ugly to us, but remember that at the time
they were probably thought to look fine.  Remember when everyone thought that
the beltless, softball style unis that MLB teams were wearing looked good?
In retrospect, they look horrible, and now the style is much different.

=Bob=
9.2326HANNAH::ASHEGoofy's going to collegeTue Sep 20 1994 14:552
    GO Lions!!!
    
9.2327Who knows his taste?HANNAH::ASHEGoofy's going to collegeTue Sep 20 1994 14:5959
From:	"George Brooks" 19-SEP-1994 20:05:14.32
To:	ashe <hannah::ashe>
CC:	
Subj:	Pass it on ...

Which "Turn Back The Clock" uniform looked best ?

Awards:

Best Uniforms:

1. Chicago Bears (1930-something)
    Steelers (1934) - Keith Olberman was a trip ...
2. Washington - Simple is cool.
3. Giants - Bring back the "ny" !!!!!
4. Rams - All we needed was Crazy Legs Hirsch.
5. San Diego
    Raiders - Those silver numbers ...

Honorable mention - Niners (should have worn the helmets), Oilers, and Broncos

Best two teams in a game with throwbacks:

1. Denver-Oakland : Hands down. All that was missing was Blanda, Warren Wells, 
Lamonica, et al ...
2. Green Bay-Philly
3. Giants-Washington

Worst Compromise:

1. Buffalo - No blue pants, no white helmets ... what in the *@#^ was that 
helmet!!?
2. Jests - Green helmets with old logo? Cheap!

 Worst throwbacks: 
(Miami,Tampa and Seattle are exempt)

1. Kansas City - Who in the hell are they fooling? 
2. Packers - If my nose was for viewing - I'd hold it.
3. Browns - See K.C. - they should have worn those unis from pre '53 (white 
helmets)
 
(Note: Miami should have just said - "Hey, we haven't changed, so don't get 
excited." Instead they said they wore their 1972 uniforms. Ooooohhhh ...)

Most disappointing:

1. Vikings - Should have worn the purple pants.
2. Pats - Elvis stinks, but Pat Patriot - was he a bit overrated?
3. KC - Dallas Texans ring a bell?
4. Denver - I wanted the vertical-striped socks. damn ...
Teams that ought to take a hint and go back to the old style:

1. San Diego
2. Giants
3. Bears
4. Rams
5. Washington
                
9.232830008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaTue Sep 20 1994 16:217
	The Dolphins should've put that tank with Flipper in it behind the 
goal post like they did in the 60's.  After every PAT or field goal Flipper 
would bat the football around in the tank. I remember one Patriot/Dolphin game 
that was 40 something to 30 something where the A.S.P.C.A could've brought 
charges against Miami for working that dolphin to exhaustion.

				   /Don
9.2329CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 20 1994 16:2418
>goal post like they did in the 60's.  After every PAT or field goal Flipper 
>would bat the football around in the tank. I remember one Patriot/Dolphin game 
>that was 40 something to 30 something where the A.S.P.C.A could've brought 
>charges against Miami for working that dolphin to exhaustion.

Kind of like the Notre Dame leprechaun who does a push-up for every point
after every score....

So in a 40 point game, that leprechaun does a load of pushups....



I wish the Giants would go back to the old helmet.  I always loved that
one, and it looked so cool on Sunday.....



'Saw
9.2330Way KoolVAOP28::RicetataTue Sep 20 1994 16:326
Lions unis were from 1936. 

What a performance by Sanders! Yow! Dallas sips thisted year, no
way they get near the SB (thank you, lord).

josh
9.233124661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingTue Sep 20 1994 17:084
    The Penn State Nittany Lion mascott does one-armed pushups for every
    point, after every score.
    
    Mark.
9.2332CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 20 1994 17:1612
>
>    The Penn State Nittany Lion mascott does one-armed pushups for every
>    point, after every score.
>    


Now THAT'S cool.

I yield to your story of the more manly mascot!


'Saw
9.2333SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Sep 20 1994 17:196
|I wish the Giants would go back to the old helmet.  I always loved that|
|one, and it looked so cool on Sunday.....

Yabbut they dropped the "ny" when they moved to Jersey.  It would drive their fans 
wild if they switched back.
9.2334CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 20 1994 17:215
>Yabbut they dropped the "ny" when they moved to Jersey.  It would drive their fans 
>wild if they switched back.

Some of their fans.....8^)

9.2335I certainly hope that the tradition was not broken...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Sep 20 1994 17:4220
>>    The Penn State Nittany Lion mascott does one-armed pushups for every
>>    point, after every score.
>    
> Now THAT'S cool.

    MikeL, Dave McNeil and I personally witnessed Notre Dame and their
    leprechaun give the lion one hell of a workout a few years back... ;-)
    
    But not like the last three games:
    
    Minnesota 56 ->  7 + 14 + 21 + 28 + 35 + 42 + 49 + 56           =  252
    USC       35 ->  7 + 14 + 21 + 28 + 35                          =  105
    Iowa      61 ->  7 + 14 + 21 + 28 + 35 + 42 + 45 + 52 + 55 + 61 =  360
                                              ^
                                              |  147 in first 15 minutes!
    
    
    glenn
    
9.2336CAMONE::WAYPony Boy take me home...Tue Sep 20 1994 18:019
Can he/she (the Lion mascot) switch arms?  Can he/she switch arms
DURING a stint of one-armed pushups?  Or is he/she allowed to use
a different arm after every score, but stick with that arm throuhout the
"set"?

These are important aspects of this feat which must be ascertained!


'Saw
9.2338some like itHBAHBA::HAASaustralopithecus westvirginiusMon Sep 26 1994 15:1912
>       Show of hands - how many people aren't at all impressed with
>      Marion Butts? I don't see where our short yardage rushing game
>      has improved appreciably.

The major beneficiary of this has been Natrone Means who has become the
Main Main for the Chargers. And of course, the Fantasy Football players
like Butts 'cause he scores.

Meanwhile Leonard Russell seems to be doing OK for Denver, if'n you can
say anything is going OK for the Donks.

TTom
9.233924661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Sep 26 1994 15:195
    Barry Sanders is gawd!
    
    What a move he put on the Pats secondary on his second touchdown.
    
    Mark.
9.2340DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Sep 26 1994 15:534
    	Yeah, I liked watching the waterboy pick up all the jocks that
    	Barry faked the Pats out of.
    
    	Scott 8-)>
9.2341Most teams could live with "failure" like this...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 26 1994 16:4812
    
>      Marshall Faulk has rushed for 61 yards in each of his last 
>      two games. Good thing we had that statue in Canton on hold.
    
    So playing for a lousy team that's been in catch-up mode the last two
    weeks, Faulk has 122 yards (which comes pretty close to a 1000-yard 
    season projected from his *worst* games, and drops him to what, second 
    in the league in rushing?).  Are you sincerely the last football fan 
    in America to fail to recognize this guy's talent?
    
    glenn
    
9.2342CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sMon Sep 26 1994 16:546
I kind of enjoyed watching Chicago beat the Jets last night.

It was UGLY football, but it was fun-to-watch ugly football.....


'Saw
9.2343MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Sep 27 1994 12:0316
    
  >> So playing for a lousy team that's been in catch-up mode the last two
  >> weeks, Faulk has 122 yards (which comes pretty close to a 1000-yard 
  >> season projected from his *worst* games, and drops him to what, second 
  >> in the league in rushing?).  Are you sincerely the last football fan 
  >> in America to fail to recognize this guy's talent?

     I assume yoyu mean, am I the last football fan to hail Marshall Faulk
     as the second coming of Barry Sanders? I guess I am. I'd just like to
     reserve judgement until after the kid does more than have a great college
     career and one great pro game. Especially, given that his numbers are 
     steadily deceasing unlike Jerome Bettis who last year also toiled for
     a truly stanky team but managed to finish second in rushing and shows 
     no sign of letting up. 
    
    
9.2344Yes, he had to come down from the 2000-yard pace...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Sep 27 1994 13:2313
> Especially, given that his numbers are 
> steadily deceasing
    
    Yes, down to that atrocious _conference-leading_ 4.7 yards/carry (even
    against the Steelers' fine defense he was over 4.0; he was at 5.5
    through the first three games).  I'm not comparing him to Sanders
    and yes we'll have to wait and see _exactly_ how good he is but this
    "steady decrease" amounts to one game which wasn't even that bad.  
    The original disparaging comment was ridiculously misleading...
    
    glenn
     
9.2345Got to love all the great RB's out there todayMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 27 1994 13:3912
    Garrison Hurst is a disapearing act, if Faulk stays healthy he will
    join the elite group of 3, he may even replace one.  Thomas is not
    getting any younger and may take one too many beatings this season.
    
    Emmitt/Barry/Marshall... Id bet on it (Hope Thurman continues to stay
    a part of this group)..
    
    This is not taking anything away from the next tier of good backs
    Hampton/Foster/Means/Watters/Bettis I just think the above 4 are 1
    notch up...
    
    								mab
9.2346A little premature, maybe?MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Tue Sep 27 1994 13:5111
    I find it interesting that Faulk is grouped in with the other three.
    If memory serves me, which it usually doesn't, he only had one big game
    out of 4 so far this year.  Even the seemingly suspect run defense of
    the Steelers held him in check for the most part.
    
    Granted he is a just a rookie, and I fully expect him to improve to be
    a leading ground gainer, but I don't think he deserves to be grouped in
    with the likes of Sanders and Smith.  (At least not yet.)
    
    
    billl
9.2347FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Sep 27 1994 14:535
    I wouldn't totally give up on Hearst yet.  He hasn't really had a
    chance to prove himself and will not have a line to run behind when he
    comes back.
    
    Mike
9.2348MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Sep 27 1994 15:2217
    
  >> Yes, down to that atrocious _conference-leading_ 4.7 yards/carry (even
  >> against the Steelers' fine defense he was over 4.0; he was at 5.5
  >> through the first three games).  I'm not comparing him to Sanders
  >> and yes we'll have to wait and see _exactly_ how good he is but this
  >> "steady decrease" amounts to one game which wasn't even that bad.  
  >> The original disparaging comment was ridiculously misleading...
    
     That "fine" Steelers' defense gave up over 4 yards per carry to
     the "fine" Seattle running game. I wonder where exactly that "fine"
     Steelers run defense ranks. And the one game that "wasn't that bad"
     was 61 yards on 22 carries for a 3.14 yards per carry average.
     For Kevin Turner that wouldn't be bad but for a guy who you were
     touting as a the next Emmitt, it ain't at all impressive. Subtract 
     Faulk's performance against the pathetic Oilers and his whole season 
     isn't very impressive thus far.
    
9.2349PTOS01::SCHRAMMETue Sep 27 1994 15:454
    
    re -1
    
      I dont know - I think Warren gives Seattle a nice running attack. 
9.2350Of course maybe Emmitt should stand alone, 2+ RingsMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 27 1994 18:0815
    My note says if Faulk stays healthy, but ok, if he stays healthy and
    the team continues to improve.  Weve seen what GREAT RB on Horrible
    teams can do (not Much).  Even Detroit had some good/great OL some of
    there years Barry's been there... Indy is a very low team, barry/emmitt
    and thurman all play for middle to top level teams...
    
    Seattle RB Warren is an excellant RB, big strong fast, but I dont think
    he'll win many Rushing Title's..... Faulk on the other hand (Bettis)
    will be right in there with the big 3....(I wish they included return
    yards in total yards from scrimmage, someone said they dont, can
    someone verify that).  Metcalf would proberbly rank right up there in
    total yards from scrimmage if Where a return man cought the ball was
    considered the line of scrimmage (Should be total yards gained)
    
    								mab
9.2351MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Tue Sep 27 1994 18:245
    I'm pretty sure that rushing titles are just total yards rushing from
    scrimmage, return yards and receiving yards are not counted.
    
    
    billl
9.2352oh noCOMET::MARLANDTue Sep 27 1994 18:292
    speaking of Bettis, there's 8 teams out there who wish theyed have 
    taken him (he was picked 9th).
9.2353Thats a tough way to make a living...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Sep 27 1994 18:2912
    Rushing title's are just total yards from scrimmage (Rushing).  I
    think more credit should be givin to the total yards gained type
    back.  Total yards should be Rushing+receiving+Return yrds, they
    do a total yard from scrimmage catagory that doesnt includ return
    yards... A back like Metcalf (run/catch/return) may be more valuable
    then a back that can only run...
    
    Man Metcalf was be one durable man.... He must take alot of hits a
    game... I dont have his exact stats but he must take 10+ good hits
    a game (Special teams always seem to hit HARD on every tackle).
    
    							mab
9.2354Wonder if Seattle is bummin thoughAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneWed Sep 28 1994 10:266
    
    
    No maybe 7 As a Patriot fan most would agree that Bledsoe was the best
    choice.
    
    Jerry
9.2355DDrrreeeewwwwwwwMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Sep 29 1994 19:1522
    has anyone been able to get into the RTFM1::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL notesfile
    today ?  I keep getting kicked out with Exceeded Enqueue Quota ?  Whos
    in charge over thre :-)
    
    Bledsoe VS Mirer.  Intresting you cant argue with success and seattle
    does have a 3-1 record to the pats 2-2.  But I dont think too many
    would aruge that seattle has the better Defense, WR's and RB's.  I 
    think Bledsoe is a better QB.  They both completed 61.9% of there
    passes so far this season.  But Bledsoe has almost twice as many Yards
    and TD's as mirer, but Mirer has only thrown 2 INT (To Bledsoe's 6).
    Bledsoe has a 90.1 rating to Mirer's 88.9 Pretty close, but bledsoe
    seems to be the better of the 2 at the QB spot.
    
    Had Seattle landed Bledsoe they would be a very scary team, Warren is
    becoming one of the top RB's, there WR (Blades/Martin) are both very
    good, and there defense is one of the top defense's in the league. I
    bet Parcells would like to trade some of NEW Englands players with
    seattle :-)
    
    But not Bledsoe he is the best QB to come into the league since Aikman
    
    								MaB
9.2357METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Sep 29 1994 19:286
> Has Mirer called a timeout at the very beginning of the 4th quarter? 

Lots of QB's have at some point or another; how is this relevant?

The Crazy Met

9.2358Obvious ChoiceMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Sep 29 1994 19:4011
    With all that seattle has to offer Mirer he should be cleaning
    house up there.  The Defense is a FEW notches higher then the
    pats defense.  And I feel blades/Martin are better WR's then the
    pats have.  Plus there opponents defense's have to respect Chris
    Warren more then Butts/Thompson (At this point in the season).
    
    So The pats are always in a Throw situation and bledsoe is handling
    it just fine.... Bledsoe is #1 over Mirer, Bledsoe is ranked 6th in
    the league (Mirer 10th).
    
    								mab
9.2361METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Sep 29 1994 19:506
fair enough; but having something like that happens hardly indicates
which QB is better. fwiw I follow neither team so this is an academic
discussion from my point of view.

The Crazy Met

9.2362Brown>Bledsoe/MirerWLW::TURCOTTEWell...I got my manThu Sep 29 1994 20:194
	I think its obvious that Dave Brown is Better than both of them, and 
	he was drafted higher...;-)

	Turk
9.2363tough dBSS::MARLANDThu Sep 29 1994 21:051
    Seattle's defense is a LOT better than New England's.
9.2364not sayin' much.....AIMHI::CORRIGANThu Sep 29 1994 21:155
    
    
    [insert here]'s defense in a LOT better than New England's
    
    
9.2365You've got to be kidding, right?EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Sep 29 1994 21:2225
    Bledsoe's head is probably at about the same place most 21-year-old's
    are at that age.  The point has been made many times over that Bledsoe
    is still a year younger than many senior college QBs, having graduated
    high school somewhere outside of the state of Texas, not redshirting, 
    and then leaving college a year early.  He's something like a year-plus 
    older than Ron Powlus, for crying out loud.  In light of the remarkable
    accomplishment so far for someone of his limited experience (especially
    since the Pats' passing offense with their 3.0 yards/carry on the
    ground has been no surprise to anyone), I don't understand the
    criticism of the occasional timeout when faced with a confusing
    defense, whether it comes at the beginning of a quarter or at the end
    (that's something that comes with experience and longterm preparation, 
    not during a commercial break).  Steve Grogan at 35 could have used 
    such judgment.  Bledsoe's only gotten off to about as good a start as
    anyone not named Dan Marino ever has.
    
    I think Tommy's just befuddled that that ridiculous scouting report 
    that he endorsed from the "unnamed AFC East GM" (no doubt Jests' 
    jeenyus Dick Steinberg) passed through Will McDonough that painted
    Bledsoe as "the next Marc Wilson, product of the system" proved to be
    so wrong.  Let's face it, the kid is an unqualified smashing success... 
    
    glenn
    
9.2366Boston Fans!! Always overrating there players!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Fri Sep 30 1994 10:229
    
    
        Lets not forget that Mike Greenwell was heavily regarded when he
    first came in the league too? Lets let Drew do something before we give
    him his one way ticket to Canton!
    
    
    
    chap
9.2367Back at ya...56821::MORGANFri Sep 30 1994 11:144
    No Chappy, it was Lou Piniella, not Nick Cafardo, who claimed Mike 
    Greenwell to be one of the top 5 hitters in the game.
    
    					Steve
9.2368WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Fri Sep 30 1994 11:438
    
    
       No it was some idiots in the Red Sox file that got my attention. I'm
    not saying Drew won't be a great player SOMEDAY. But Right now he's
    not!
    
    
    Chap
9.2369No one mentioned Canton (or Cooperstown), try and keep up ChapEDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Sep 30 1994 12:5316
    
>    No it was some idiots in the Red Sox file that got my attention. I'm
>    not saying Drew won't be a great player SOMEDAY. But Right now he's
>    not!
    
    I have great appreciation for the fact that a 20-21 year old kid has
    thrown for almost 4000 yards over his first 16 NFL starts.  No more, 
    no less.  I don't have a problem recognizing talent in its own 
    time, as opposed to waiting until the player is retired, or dead.  
    It's completely reasonable to watch the games with a proper 
    perspective on history and it makes them a heck of a lot more fun.  
    And I'm certainly not going to go the other way, look at that level 
    of performance from a player so young and run him down for it...
    
    glenn
    
9.2371Johnny U > Roger Staubach > Marino >...... >DrewWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Fri Sep 30 1994 13:387
    
    
       Bob Lobel has already put him on the Patriots 50 yr AllTeam? Not
    saying the guy is bad but lets wait before we call him Drew U.
    
    
    Chappy
9.2372CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sFri Sep 30 1994 13:4322
9.2373"Great" supporting cast? By what standard?EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Sep 30 1994 13:5529
    
> I'm not denying the kid has a
> great arm (and a great supporting cast, too!).
    
    I have to disagree with this part about a "great supporting cast". 
    I still believe that the one element that the Patriots lack even
    considering their relative youth is the overall talent base.  In the
    off-season we heard about how wonderful the O-line promised to be and
    yet the running game is nearly non-existent, and that is a large
    disadvantage from which Bledsoe must work, regardless of what he has 
    for pass-catchers (and we haven't even gotten to the pressure that the 
    poor defense has created).  The wide receivers may be better than 
    expected but there's certainly no consistent greatness there.  Coates 
    is awesome, no question.  So in the formula that says that you win 
    Super Bowls with 4-5 top-caliber players on each side of the ball, 30 
    other players of established competence, and strong coaching, what do 
    the Patriots have in the first category?  Bledsoe, Coates, Armstrong, 
    and Vincent Brown, at the present time, maybe?   
    
    From your comments I'm coming to the conclusion that you believe with 
    an experienced QB in lieu of the young Bledsoe, with this "great" 
    supporting cast the Pats would be much better off.  I just don't see 
    that at all.  I think he's more than holding up his end of the bargain, 
    and compared to the sorry cast of characters, including veterans, that 
    shuttled through here after Grogan he's a huge improvement, even with
    the mistakes.
    
    glenn
    
9.2374Even for Bledsoe, this was minor...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Sep 30 1994 14:1820
> I would expect Bledsoe to make some dumb mistakes (running on 4th and 1)
    
    By the way, this "mistake" by Bledsoe has been largely exaggerated 
    all around.  In an absolute desperation situation, the Pats barely 
    failed to pick up the first down on the play before.  That was the
    critical play.  There were under 10 seconds to go before even the
    coaching staff knew what was going on.  While some very heady play by
    Bledsoe might have saved a few seconds and picked up a 1st down, we're 
    talking about hoping for a miracle produced out of nothing.  This 
    situation was nothing like the one where "cagey veteran" Hugh Millen 
    decided to run for daylight and glory with no timeouts in that game 
    against the Broncos two years ago, as I heard this play compared to.
    That one was a conscious decision in a well-defined game situation
    from a play called in the huddle, where the tying FG was in the bag,
    by way of comparison...
    
    glenn
    
    
9.2375SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Fri Sep 30 1994 14:2110
    
    	In regards to Bledsoe calling timout at the beginning of the 4th
    quarter.  I think it was because the coaching staff messed up. What
    is Bledsoe suppose to do if they call a play called 44 right on 2.
    Meaning, hand the ball off to Butts to run right and Butts isn't even
    in the game? I think the play at the start of the 4th quarter was going
    to be a pass to Coates. Coates wasn't even in the game, so Drew called
    the Timeout.
    
    Ron
9.2376Bledsoe VS Favre...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Sep 30 1994 14:5930
    Name 1 QB to come after Aikman thats better then Bledsoe.  If I was
    starting a new young team (say one of the expansion teams). Bledsoe
    would be my first choice at QB (To build around).  The top QB's in
    the league today are mostly at the end of there careers (Marino, Kelly
    Montana, Elway, (Any Pho QB :-)), Cunningham, Moon, Young etc).
    
    Id say the above 7 are arguably 7 of the top 10 in the league today
    the other 3 IMHO would be Favre, Bledsoe, George.
    
    And Yes they have one of the Best Young TE's in the league (Maybe the
    best) but would any of the WR's in NE take the #1 (or #2) spot on any
    teams around the league ?  Id say Blades would be a #1/#2 WR on most
    of the teams in the league, Im not so sure about any of the NE WR's.
    
    So Mirer has better WR's, Better Defense, Better RB, Bledsoe has Coates
    (and a better coach).  Mirer should have better #'s, but he's not as
    good a QB as Bledsoe.  Bledsoe's only problem at this point is youth,
    he thinks he can do it all, and once he gets over that (Parcells should
    cure that quickly) he will make less mistakes, calling a timeout at any
    point of a game that may help lead to a score is better then throwing a
    play away (Or an INT).
    
    If I was an expansion team, My #1 pick (If I could chose) would be
    Bledsoe at QB.  Could he flop, of course, But Id take a young talanted
    QB over most of the aging QB's.  Parcells is building a winning team
    and has the biggest/best piece all set...
    
    GO PATS BEAT GB....
    
    							mab
9.2377CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sFri Sep 30 1994 15:058
I've got to agree with someone who said earlier that Dave Brown is damn 
good....

I was not high on him at all to start with, but he's proven himself to
be tough, and he does a good job under pressure....  His stock has 
risen in my opinion.

'Sawe
9.2378Coupla VikesANGLIN::WIERSBECKFri Sep 30 1994 15:0611
    We interrupt this Boston-based chest-thumping/bashing rathole to bring
    the other following NFL news:
    
    Warren Moon has been name NFC Offensive Player of the Week 
    
    Jack Del Rio has been named NFC Defensive Player of the Month.
    
    Thank you and bash away,
    
    
    Spud
9.2380Who Let this Kramer guy get away :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Sep 30 1994 16:4010
    Dave brown is averaging 170yrds per game, had 4TD's on the year and
    2INT's.  511yrds for the season, didnt bledsoe throw that many in 1
    game :-) Brown is 35 for 56 on the SEASON, 35 RECEPTIONS ??? in 3 games
    12 per game ?  Those arent GREAT #'s... But he's 3-0,... and he's
    ranked 5th in the league (Ahead of YOUNG ?).
    
    Of course this ranking qb's is strange, even if the #'s pan out how
    can Kramer be listed as the Top Ranked QB in the NFL 107.5 rating...
    
    								mab
9.2381CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sMon Oct 03 1994 12:1314
>    Dave brown is averaging 170yrds per game, had 4TD's on the year and
>    2INT's.  511yrds for the season, didnt bledsoe throw that many in 1
>    game :-) Brown is 35 for 56 on the SEASON, 35 RECEPTIONS ??? in 3 games
>    12 per game ?  Those arent GREAT #'s... But he's 3-0,... and he's
>    ranked 5th in the league (Ahead of YOUNG ?).

Okay, don't forget, the Giants have a running game -- quite a good one.

What I was talking about was mainly poise and leadership ability, which
doesn't always show in the stats.



'Saw
9.2382Brown hasnt had a GREAT game yet ?MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Oct 03 1994 18:3511
    Back to earth for Giants Fans.. .This is one of those HOW CAN IT BE
    
    Well Brown had another Brown type day 20-35-2-152, didnt even reach 
    his 170yrd average, 663yrds for the season, 2 TD's and 2 INT's.  I
    will say one thing, no QB can have a decent game getting sacked 7
    times, plus I think he had over 10 Hurries, and qutie a few KnockDowns
    as well....Big game for NY next Week VS Minny, both teams fighting to
    stay on top in there division, Phoenix Travels to Dallas... Should be
    intresting :-)
    
    								mab
9.2383CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Oct 04 1994 12:1950
>                    -< Brown hasnt had a GREAT game yet ? >-

If you measure GREAT games by statistics, no, he hasn't.  But then again,
as I've said before, O Dense One, the Giants have a running game, and use
it quite frequently.


>    Back to earth for Giants Fans.. .This is one of those HOW CAN IT BE

If you knew anything at all about the Giants, you'd know HOW CAN IT BE.

The Giants historically SUCK in the game after a bye.  Why you might ask?
Well, beating Mike Childs to the punch, I'll tell you about Coach Good Time
Dan, who always gives his guys the week of the bye off.

Every time he's done that (which is every time period) they've lost the
following game.

A tap-dancing Chris Calloway stated on WFAN that he felt the team was
ready physically, but that they might have lost some of it mentally, which
I think it is the case.


    
>I will say one thing, no QB can have a decent game getting sacked 7
>    times, plus I think he had over 10 Hurries, and qutie a few KnockDowns
>    as well....

Yeah, the o-line SUCKED yesterday.  There were some injuries and I knew
going into the season that there is no depth in the o-line, not at least
like there was in the old days.


What I think Brown brings to the club is poise and leadership ability.
The players respect him, he's man enough to admit his mistakes (especially
on the INT for a TD) and he seems durable.

Given the choice between a QB who puts up great stats (Dan Marino) and
a QB who can lead you to the Super Bowl, I'll take the latter every time....




The Minny game will tell alot.  I think the Giants will lose it.


'Saw



9.2384Randall's my main man on my FFL roster ...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Oct 04 1994 12:3822
    Well just who IS the cream of the Crop in the NFL...
    
    The 49ers went out and got everything they needed, well instead of
    Dion :-) they should have grabbed some debth at OL.  The 49ers with
    a fairly easy schedule (I thin the 2nd or 3rd easiest in the NFL) is
    now at 3-2.  If you made a list of WHO looks like Playoff teams in the
    NFL the 49ers have played 2 Playoff teasm in KC and Phillya and lost
    both ?  I still think SF has the most talant and gained the most in the
    offseason but something is not quite right down there in SF land.
    
    Will be very intresting to see who rises to the top, Philly will have
    to beat Dallas to be considered a threat in the NFC east, but Randall
    does look like the randall of old.... With a Running Game and Barnett
    back in the picture there defense may be more then adequte to get the
    job done.
    
    Id say Randall and Barnett are close to being fully recoverd, if
    barnett can get his timing back LOOKOUT they could be contenders.
    
    Philly could be that underdog team to push past Dallas/SF in the NFC
    
    								mab
9.2385Vikes/Jersey Giants next Monday nightANGLIN::WIERSBECKTue Oct 04 1994 13:4911
    Let's hope 'saw is right and the Vikes do take the Gnats.  :*)  The
    Vikes O looked sickly vs. AZ and they blew a chance to really open up
    on the division.  A win here and they should be on their way to the NFC
    Central title, a loss and it'll be a struggle the rest of the way.
    
    Go VIKES!!!
    
    
    Spud
    
    PS, who is Dave Brown and where did he come from?  I'm serious...
9.2386MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Tue Oct 04 1994 13:557
    Dave Brown is from Duke.  The Giants drafted him in the supplemental
    draft 3 years ago.
    
    The Giants lost a game they shouldn't have this week.  Hopefully, they
    can make up for it against the Vikes.
    
    Mike
9.238724661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingTue Oct 04 1994 15:225
    Can someone please decode .2384 for me?
    
    Thanks in advance.
    
    Mark.
9.2389Gee, John, how are you handling your newfound freedom?EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 04 1994 15:419
    Fact is, Dan Reeves is looking like a better all-around football coach 
    by the minute.  He may not be the world's most innovative coach, but 
    somehow he gets guys ready to play and then they go out and do so.  
    It's looking more and more like the wrong guy won the ongoing 
    Reeves/Elway battle...
    
    glenn
    
9.2390SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Oct 04 1994 16:147
|    Can someone please decode .2384 for me?

Careful Mark, MairB is very sensitive about this stuff.  He's a high 
school grad, you know, and was at the top of his college class.  He
also has a wildly successfull career here at Digital.

=Bob=
9.239124661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingTue Oct 04 1994 16:164
    Thanks, equalBobequal.  For a minute, I thought REK had access to the
    net.
    
    Mark.
9.2392CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Oct 04 1994 16:2638
>
>    Thanks, equalBobequal.  For a minute, I thought REK had access to the
>    net.
>    

Yeah, I thought RCASO was back.  But you have to be vewy, vewy qwiet talking
about spelling and gwammer wif dese wascally wabbits on the net.....



re Tommy:

	Yeah, ALWAYS in the two years he's been there.  What's so
	hard to figure about that.   I don't know the bye records
	under Handley, but nothing was good under him.

	
	Lauding Dave Brown as a good QB is not mutually exclusive of
	being pissed at letting Simms go.  Dave Brown is a good QB
	and he's picked up some things very quickly.  I still would
	have liked to have seen Simms there this season as Brown's
	mentor, but I'm not displeased with what Dave Brown has shown.


re Glenn:

	Reeves has a way of getting his teams (or at least this Giants
	team -- last year, this year) to overachieve.

	He has a similar fault to Snuffy though, and that is when it's
	on the line, he cannot or will not "improvise, overcome and adapt"
	his game plan to try and beat the opposition.   That was 
	supremely evident his his Super Bowl appearances and last season
	against San Fran.....


'Saw

9.2393I hate those stupid bye weeks...SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Oct 04 1994 16:365
|	hard to figure about that.   I don't know the bye records
|	under Handley, but nothing was good under him.


Isn't lasted year the firsted year with bye weeks?
9.2395CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Oct 04 1994 16:4527
>    "Always" meaning twice. I suppose you could have just said
>    "twice" but that wouldn't have had the same effect. And with

Always as in EVERY time Reeves has faced a bye with the Giants, which
I believe totals three times.  I'd have to go back and check, but
I think they had two byes last year also.


As to Reeves, I've watched him in the SB and I watched him all last
season with the Giants.   If his game plan (including all his gadget plays)
don't work, he keeps pounding it against the wall hoping that it will.



re =Bob= and byes:

	I don't have the records, but they had byes last year, and
	for at least one season before that, but there was one year
	(two years ago?) where they didn't...or something like that.

	I didn't realize it, but back in 1960 the NFL had bye weeks because
	they had an odd number of teams.


'Saw


9.2396LOCK::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsTue Oct 04 1994 17:208
    
    	Waugamain is correct, the wrong guy won that urination contest
    	in Denver.  However, 'Saw mentioned something about no depth
    	on the OL.  Get used to it!  That was my only gripe with Reeves
    	while he was with Denver....he'd just stock the line with whatever
    	castoffs he could find.
    
    Claybone
9.2397the way of the NFL worldSCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Oct 04 1994 17:266
|    	while he was with Denver....he'd just stock the line with whatever
|    	castoffs he could find.

Unfortunatly, there aren't too many teams with first-rate starters
on their o-line these days...

9.2398fickle fansCNTROL::CHILDSShe was a TWO-BaggerTue Oct 04 1994 17:278
 but last year when Elway was running up the big numbers you guys were
 happy to be rid if Reeves and BLAM(tm) him. Now that Elway has come
 back to earth he's the bum and Reeves was gawd? Make up your mind.

 imo they both suck. but you already knew that..........

 mike
9.2400LOCK::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsTue Oct 04 1994 17:358
    
    MikeyC.,
    
    	I defy you to find any note of mine in this conference which
    	supported Reeves being fired.  I was one of the few that
    	thought it was a stupid move.  Too bad owners can't be fired...
    
    Claybone
9.2401CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Oct 04 1994 17:3820
Agreed Mikey....


The Giants had some solid o-line starters -- but no depth, and there
have been a couple of injuries.

We must be going through an OL drought.  Let's face it.  Kids don't wanna
play line.  If you play o-line, you can't shuck and jive and wiggle your
ass on the camera whilst you wave a finger in someone's face.

How many folks know that the oldest active player in the NFL, with the most
years in, is a lineman.....

You have to have a certain kind of mindset to play o-line -- one where you
are satisfied to be part of the team, and don't mind not having the 
limelight on you.   Throwing the perfect block in an anonymous situation
isn't for everyone... and hey, these days, kids don't want that....


'Saw
9.2402CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sTue Oct 04 1994 17:4314
Tommy,

I'm not BLAMing(tm) Reeves for others mistakes, but what I can blame old
Good Time Dan for is his vacation week on the bye week.  

The players lose focus, and in his tenure, it's an assured thing that they'll
lose on the bye week.


However, I will give the man this much credit.  He's already said "no time
off on the bye week next year"


'Saw
9.2403HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 04 1994 17:5112
  Something else needs to be thrown into the mix before we conclude that Reeves
is losing due to his week off. Who did the Giants lose to those weeks after the
bye? 

  If they lost to teams with mediocre or bad records, then that might be a
problem but if a couple or three of those loses were close ones to teams that
ended up around 13-3 then I don't know if that proves all that much. 

  True practice is important but recovering from the beating you take as a
player is important also.

  George 
9.2404EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 04 1994 17:5810
> True practice is important but recovering from the beating you take as a
> player is important also.
    
    Which is why Bill "Hard Guy, Jints-fans' endorsed" Parcells just let
    the Pats off till Wednesday as a reward for winning two straight tough
    games.  Some of this stuff is pure coincidence...
    
    glenn
    
9.2405The SPEED NOTERMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Oct 04 1994 18:547
    Ya, Ya Ya I know Im the only one in here that doenst have time to 
    PROOF READ ALL MY NOTES... Sorry, 2 people out today, covering for
    both...
    
    That one even made me ask, what the he'll was I trying to type...
    				
    								mab
9.2406this just in.....MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Wed Oct 05 1994 13:2410
    Just heard an interesting development on the news regarding the
    Simpson trial.  Judge Lance Ito has decided....
    
    to move the trial to Cincinati(sp?) where nobody knows anything
    about football.
    
    
    nyuk, nyuk,
    
    billl
9.2407CloseSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOWed Oct 05 1994 14:2311
re: billl

>    to move the trial to Cincinati(sp?) where nobody knows anything
>    about football.

	billl,

	you heard wrong, but you were close.  They're moving it to 
Cleveland, not Cincinnati.  Same reason though!

	zamboni
9.2408FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Oct 05 1994 15:273
    >    Can someone please decode .2384 for me?
    
    I would've but I lost my RCASO decoder ring.
9.2409ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 05 1994 16:178
9.2410nyuk, nyukMKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Wed Oct 05 1994 17:157
    >>Oh great knowledgeable New England sports fans, I am not worthy to
    >>post here...
      
    You finally figured that out!  Who says Cleveland folks are slow?!
    
    
    billl  
9.2411CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sThu Oct 06 1994 13:1915
>    Ya, Ya Ya I know Im the only one in here that doenst have time to 
>    PROOF READ ALL MY NOTES... Sorry, 2 people out today, covering for
>    both...
>    

I proof read mine while I do them....8^)


>    That one even made me ask, what the he'll was I trying to type...
    				
That's a good thing to know. 8^) 8^) 8^)


'Saw

9.2412SOLANA::MAY_BRQUIET--case study in progressFri Oct 07 1994 15:506
>        I proof read mine while I do them....8^) 
    
    Yah, butt, caw if ewe tiped wif yore tows like MerrorB duz, u'd half a
    hared thyme pruf riting az u dew dem.
    
    brews
9.2413CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sFri Oct 07 1994 16:554
Rollward Brews....rollward.....


Seen any more snakes lately btw?
9.2414SOLANA::MAY_BRQUIET--case study in progressMon Oct 10 1994 14:4920
   > Seen any more snakes lately btw?
    
    Well, since you axed, Sept-early Oct. is prime snake season.  My dog
    got bit in the stomach by one about 3 weeks ago.  I noticed a bit of
    blood dripping from her, and  after an inspection, figured I'd better
    take her in to the vet.  Sure enough, whe'd been bit, right in our
    backyard.  
    
    The stomach is an unusual place for a dog to get bit, she must have
    walked right over a hole the thing was in.  Usually they get bit on the
    snout or neck.  
    
    SHe's OK now though.  I guess I caught her early enough.  THe vet told
    me of another dog that got it in the stomach and the venom got into the
    dog's organs (didn't happen in my case, just a surface bite).  THe dog
    needed 14 doses of anti-venom.  Anti-venom goes for $250 a pop, so you
    figure that plus the hospitalization, the dog probably cost them over
    $5000.
    
    brews 
9.2415CAMONE::WAYModels caskets for D'Esopo'sMon Oct 10 1994 14:5819
Wow.

Our snake season here is a little different -- obviously the hot summer
months (June, July, August) are prime for rattlers.   August is a bit tough
because they shed and are blind and ornery.

I never worried when I was in Hebron, because I'd see black snakes from
time to time on the property and they're natural enemies of the Easter
Timber Rattler -- at least that's what all the old timers (including
my Dad) tell me.

Where I am now in Glastonbury, I still keep an eye open when I leave the 
house.....  But with the cooler nights now, the snakes have pretty much
headed back into their dens.....


Hope your dog will be okay!

'Saw
9.2416poor man's anti-venomFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 10 1994 15:206
    up in Northern AZ where you have to drive many miles to get to a vet,
    people just give their animals Benadryl capsules as an anti-venom. 
    Works pretty good too!  Some say they've even see their pets make a
    comeback even after the head starts swelling from the venom.
    
    Mike
9.2417SOLANA::MAY_BRQUIET--case study in progressMon Oct 10 1994 15:3211
    
    Benadryl works more as an antihistamine, to keep the swelling down. 
    Anti-venom actually fights the poison.
    
    THe dog is fine now.  Wouldn't even know that she was bitten.  It'll be
    interesting to see what she does next time she sees a rattler, though. 
    She always wanted to play with them before.  I never did find the snake
    that got her either, which didn't make the wifey too happy.  
    
    brews 
         
9.2419Okay, I get it: if young, thou shalt not make mistakesNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 10 1994 19:5920
    
>      Marshall Faulk's woes continue as he fumbled twice 
>      during Indy's loss to the Jets. Two fumbles and coach 
>      Bill Parcells would bench his butt if he played for the 
>      Pats.
    
    Somehow I doubt this, unless Parcells is now prepared to bench Kevin
    Turner, just as he was prepared to bench Fumblin' Leonard Russell
    early last year until he figured out there was no one else who could 
    carry the ball.  To an even greater extent, for good or bad Faulk is 
    practically Indy's entire offense.  Again, to describe Faulk's 550 
    yards rushing, 4.5 yards/carry output for the season as woeful 
    because of a couple fumbles in one otherwise typically strong game is 
    like blaming the Pats' loss to Miami on Ben Coates because he finally 
    coughed up the ball on his 11th or 12th catch-and-run of the day.  In 
    other words, he's carrying most of the load, and doing it rather 
    nicely, so the Colts will gladly go back to the well.
    
    glenn
    
9.2420Why don't the Pats get guys like this?!MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Tue Oct 11 1994 10:5210
    Heard on the radio this morning....
    
    Doug <too small for the NFL> Flutie lead his CFL team to a record 22nd
    straight win last night with 3 TD passes.
    
    (Figured I would stir up some old football ratholes and take the heat
    off the hunting note.)
    
    
    billl
9.2421some food for thoughtMKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Tue Oct 11 1994 11:3634
    NFL Power Rating    Week    6
    2 points for each win and 1 point for each defeated opponents win
 
              Team Opp.
         Team Wins Wins Pts. Opponents Defeated
       1 Min     4   13   21 Chi  Det  Mia  NYG
       2 Phi     4   12   20 Chi  GB   SF   Was
       3 SD      5    9   19 Cin  Den  Rai  Sea  KC
       4 Chi     4   11   19 NYJ  TB   Buf  NO
       5 Buf     4    9   17 Den  Hou  NE   Mia
       6 Mia     4    9   17 GB   NE   NYJ  Cin
       7 KC      3   10   16 Atl  NO   SF
       8 SF      4    8   16 Rai  Ram  NO   Det
       9 Atl     4    7   15 Ram  Was  Ram  TB
      10 Dal     4    6   14 Hou  Pit  Was  Ari
      11 Cle     4    6   14 Ari  Cin  Ind  NYJ
      12 GB      3    8   14 Min  TB   Ram
      13 NYJ     3    7   13 Buf  Den  Ind
      14 Pit     3    7   13 Cle  Ind  Hou
      15 Det     2    8   12 Atl  Dal
      16 NYG     3    6   12 Ari  Phi  Was
      17 Sea     3    6   12 Rai  Pit  Was
      18 NE      3    5   11 Cin  Det  GB
      19 TB      2    6   10 Ind  Atl
      20 NO      2    5    9 TB   NYG
      21 Ram     2    4    8 Ari  KC
      22 Ind     2    4    8 Hou  Sea
      23 Rai     2    4    8 Den  NE
      24 Ari     1    4    6 Min
      25 Den     1    3    5 Sea
      26 Was     1    2    4 NO
      27 Hou     1    0    2 Cin
      28 Cin     0    0    0
 
9.2423Not hyped-filled quotes; *facts*EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 11 1994 17:0419
>       so Marshall Faulk has shown with his two 60 yard performances and 
>       a two fumble performance that he's not nearly ready to join Barry 
>       and Emmitt, if he ever will be. Yes, let's appreciate these guys
>       while they're playing and striding toward greatness but let's not
>       get so wrapped up in the hype that we read way too much into simple
>       quotes and are ready to can(t)onize these guys before they've hardly
>       tasted NFL action.
    
    Save it for someone who cares.  The only thing I've objected to is the
    ridiculous notion that a rookie who is leading the AFC in rushing 
    yardage, yards per carry average, and rushing touchdowns has done 
    "nothing" yet, has experienced continuing "woes", etc.  All for a 
    lousy team that has one of the lowest passing outputs in the league 
    and has few other options.  The spin placed on the occasional failure
    with no credit given to successes is just dishonest; nothing less.
    
    glenn
    
9.2424Like who cares...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Oct 11 1994 18:314
    Id like to see Flutie and his team take on the marlboro shamrocks,
    out wait the shamrocks are in a tougher league....
    
    								mab
9.2426Nope, that was also a straight-up, completely innocent summationEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 11 1994 19:4231
      
>     The leading the AFC in various categories is deceiving (not that 
>     you would be *purposely* decpetive. ha!). Faulk has played one more 
>     game than Barry Foster and Natrone Means who both haven't gone three 
>     straight weeks without a hundred yard game as Faulk has. That's a fact.
    
    No matter how you attempt to slice it, it's still pretty darned good. 
    Which is the only thing I've ever said.  I have never claimed that
    Faulk is better than Smith, Sanders, Foster, or Bettis.  Just that 
    he's played well; very well in fact.  It's up to you to explain how 
    leading the league in all those categories under _any_ circumstances 
    (gaining 90 and 93 yards instead of the magical 100, etc.) is somehow 
    substandard.  Perspective.  I believe your idea of that was "so far
    he's done nothing".
    
>    And turning "I'd like to think we'll see some improvement" into
>    "if he doesn;t improve one iota..." is what. Something Honest George
>    Washington would be proud of? Please.
    
    I believe the correct comparison would be to "I'd like to think we'll
    see some improvement but if there is no room for improvement..."
    ("no", as in none, as in not at all).  "If there is no room for
    improvement", "if he doesn't improve one iota".  Hmmm, I'm busted.
    Go back to what I wrote in 56.1222 and then read Ryan's interpretation 
    in 56.1243.  There is absolutely no difference in meaning with my 
    paraphrase.  Now if you're also in disagreement with how others also 
    took the comment, that's fine, but I did not misrepresent the article
    in any way.    
    
    glenn
    
9.2427MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Oct 11 1994 20:0928
     re .2426
   
     This is what you originally wrote:
    
      "Yesterday I read a quote from the great Bill Parcells where he 
       said that even if Bledsoe were not to improve one iota further, 
       his progress to quality finished product is still the fastest that 
       he's ever seen."
    
     Sound like Bill is fairly gushing. But wait! Here's what Bill really
     said:
    
      "I would like to think we'll see some improvement," says Parcells. 
      "But if there is no room for improvement then this is the fastest 
       acceleration to completion I've ever seen."
    
     "If he doesn't improve" not "even if he doesn't improve one iota". If
      he doesn't improve one iota of course it would be the fastest accel-
      eration that Bill has only seen - the kid has only played eighteen
      games! No one is a complete quarterback after just eighteen games not 
      even Drew. Not even Marino. Bill said "I would like to think we'll see 
      some improvement" because there's plenty of room for it but your mangling
      of the quote leaves that completely out. There's no mention of "quality
      finished product" either. That was another one of your addendums. And 
      today Bob Ryan fesses up that he fawns over Drew. Pile your gushing on 
      top of Bob's gushing and it amounts to SPORTS' version of start a rumor 
      at one end of a room and see what it is transformed into at the other 
      end. "Coach Bill said Drew is better than Unitas already!"
9.2428In certain rare instances, I have no problem with "fawning"EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 11 1994 20:5138
                                       
>     "If he doesn't improve" not "even if he doesn't improve one iota". If
>      he doesn't improve one iota of course it would be the fastest accel-
>      eration that Bill has only seen - the kid has only played eighteen
>      games! No one is a complete quarterback after just eighteen games not 
>      even Drew. Not even Marino. Bill said "I would like to think we'll see 
>      some improvement" because there's plenty of room for it but your mangling
>      of the quote leaves that completely out. There's no mention of "quality
>      finished product" either.
    
    I thought it was obvious that "quality finished product", "acceleration
    to completion", whatever, still falls well short of "greatness;
    Unitas-like in stature".  Hence my use of the conditional, "even if", 
    as in this probably isn't all there is.  Seriously, when I entered that 
    I didn't think it would be so wildly controversial, and as far as I
    know Bob Ryan hasn't been deluged with angry letters either. ;-) 
    
    As for the accusation of fawning, guilty as charged!  Consider it to
    be nothing more than an early prediction (same for Faulk), if you
    must.  When Roger Clemens struck out 20 batters early in 1986 and then
    went on to win 24 games in his first full season, you didn't need the
    complete encyclopedic career record of a polished pitcher in front of
    you to know that you were witnessing greatness, even if there is
    always the possibility that something can go horribly wrong.  If you
    missed that magic because Clemens wasn't established enough it's too 
    bad because team circumstances dictated that it was never quite as 
    good again.  Same thing with Bledsoe.  I'm saying straight up that 
    we're seeing the same thing here, appreciating it in the present, well 
    in advance of the phony post-facto "you could see it from the very 
    start".  And why not?  If you believe that, then say it.  Bob Ryan once
    again deserves credit for that, instead of churning out the formulaic 
    "let's wait and see" stuff of boredom.  It's a major part of the fun 
    of sports.  To me, as usual, it's the thousands of kids descending on 
    Foxborough in their Bledsoe jerseys that are the ones not over-analyzing 
    this kind of a rarity and properly seeing it for what it is.
    
    glenn
    
9.2429ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 11 1994 23:256
9.2430O8SIS::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindWed Oct 12 1994 10:006
    Saw something in the Globe whereby the writer (Ryan, I think) asked
    the question of what the reaction would be if if had been Flutie last
    Sunday for the Pats who had so many passes batted-down/tipped. 
    Interesting, to say the least.
    
    Lee
9.2431HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 12 1994 12:459
  Flutie had some decent games for the Pats. In fact I believe that in one
season their record with Flutie playing was better than their record without
him playing.

  One thing for sure, the only time that I was able to stomach watching the
Patriots between their AFL days and now was when Flutie was playing. He was
fun to watch. I like QBs who scramble. Sort of like Fran Tarkinton.

  George
9.2432Flutie's record speaks for itself25022::BREENWed Oct 12 1994 13:3813
    Flutie was forced upon the Patriots by Pat Sullivan, in part as a
    strike breaker - Flutie had one choice, play in the strike game or get
    out of nfl.
    
    His was the most obvious case of a "scab" being forced out of the
    league by teammates not putting forth the effort (when he qb'ed).  What
    evidence do I have?  Just my observation and a lot of between the lines
    talk, specifically a Nick Cafardo reference I talked about before.
    
    His CFL performances though have vindicated his ability.  Warren Moon
    and Joe Theisman had similar CFL records and went on the NFL.
    
    Also, while with the Patriots his record was far superior to Eason's.
9.2433MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Oct 12 1994 13:5921
   >> Seriously, when I entered that I didn't think it would be so wildly 
   >> controversial, and as far as I know Bob Ryan hasn't been deluged with 
   >> angry letters either. ;-) 
    
      That's because anyone who reads Ryan knows he tends to go overboard
      when he becomes enamoured of a Boston sports figure. Witness his
      article earlier this year on the genius of Bill Parcells and of how
      every press conference is a cathartic learning experience. You, on
      the other hand, were known as an incurable gusher but this twisting
      of stats and quotes is something new. What's more is, it all would have
      gone unnoticed or at least unmentioned if when I said that I didn't 
      interpret the Parcells quote the same way you did, you didn't come back 
      with "I guess the fact that it came at the end of a Bob-Ryan-gushes-over
      latest-Boston-hero column as a kicker of "and if you don't believe  
      me, this quote from the Big Tuna himself pretty much says it all" 
      didn't tip you off." Stupid me! I guess I just are dum. Of course, you 
      made up all of that "Big Tuna" stuff just like you made up the "if he 
      doesn't improve one iota" stuff. Very disturbing. Appreciating Drew
      (and I do) is one thing but fabricating quotes to elevate him even
      further is quite another.
    
9.243424661::LEFEBVREHave U hugged Jerry Garcia today?Wed Oct 12 1994 14:373
    Bob Ryan is a wannabee.
    
    Mark.
9.2436GAG!FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Oct 12 1994 16:181
    ...and he lost it in a big way too!
9.2437ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 12 1994 18:253
9.2438FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Oct 12 1994 18:441
    It was a bet on Browns' fans being smarter than dawgs.  
9.2439ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 13 1994 00:363
9.2440HANNAH::ASHEWhat's the frequency, Robert?Thu Oct 13 1994 13:463
    Anyone know who starts at QB for the Rams this week?  Chandler? 
    Miller?
    
9.24416-3?AIMHI::KCUMMINGSThu Oct 13 1994 14:386
    
    
    Flutie was 6-3 I believe when he last q-b'd for the Pats.
    
    Saw him live against the Bengals ( Pats won) he really floats the 
    ball...
9.2442Miller injured, surely you jest!ODIXIE::ZOGRANAntelope Freeway, One MileThu Oct 13 1994 14:489
    re .2440 - Atlanta paper says Miller is still the starting QB, so
    unless he's hurt (he's never hurt, is he? :-)), he be startin'.
    
    The paper also said that LA's starting center and tackle will be out
    (Injured).  Looks like ol' Chrissy may get to taste the turf this weekend.
    
    UMDan
    
    
9.2443FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Oct 13 1994 14:544
    I heard Miller was starting too.
    
    Groaner, why don't you do the right thing and take Drexler off my
    hands.
9.2444OLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindThu Oct 13 1994 15:123
    
    
    Chandler is listed as probable
9.2445ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 13 1994 15:345
9.2446FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Oct 13 1994 15:472
    Miner's not even on your roster, you wanker.  If you were really nice,
    you'd give me Jackson.
9.2447ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 13 1994 16:118
9.2448FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Oct 13 1994 16:411
    Miner is on there now since the corrected version was just posted. ;-)
9.2449HANNAH::ASHEWhat's the frequency, Robert?Thu Oct 13 1994 16:564
    Is this an NFL discussion...
    
    I'd give you Hardaway Heiser, but I don't own the team anymore...
    
9.2450FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Oct 13 1994 19:291
    Well you should've thought about that last week, you turkey!
9.2451HANNAH::ASHEand I'm feeeeelin' strong...Thu Oct 13 1994 19:302
    Well, I didn't want to be accused of dumping... I thought about it
    and nixed the deal...
9.2452whole new twist to PennyFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Oct 13 1994 19:334
    I would've given you Drexler for him!  That's an even trade if there
    ever was one.  Especially since the $134M man may not play.
    
    Mike
9.2453ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Thu Oct 13 1994 19:395
    
    So, Mike, if you think Drexler for Penny is an even deal, I'm sure
    you'd be happy to trade Mourning for Daugherty - right?
    
    Joe
9.2454FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Oct 13 1994 22:351
    Only if Brad's back gets better.
9.2455PTOS02::JACOBRIt's nobody's fault but mine....Fri Oct 14 1994 01:564
    Any updates on the Brown(spot)s(tm) and the Oilscum????
    
    JaKe
    
9.2456WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Fri Oct 14 1994 11:333
    
    
    Brownies 11  Hou 8
9.245724661::LEFEBVRETerrapin Station &gt;&gt; Sgt. PepperFri Oct 14 1994 11:413
    Browns covered.
    
    Mark.
9.2458underHBAHBA::HAASaustralopithecus westvirginiusFri Oct 14 1994 12:150
9.2459HANNAH::ASHEand I'm feeeeelin' strong...Fri Oct 14 1994 12:553
    He was going to give me Drexler and Thorpe.  I wanted something with
    draft picks...
    
9.2460PTOS02::JACOBRIt's nobody's fault but mine....Fri Oct 14 1994 18:426
    11-8, what were they playing, baseball?????
    
    What a wimpy score.
    
    JaKe
    
9.2461PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Oct 14 1994 18:475
>    11-8, what were they playing, baseball?????
    
  Nope, worse than that,...soccer.    

	Keith
9.2462ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sun Oct 16 1994 19:253
9.2463HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 17 1994 17:5218
  Just going by records, the A.F.C. east seems to be the strongest division
in the NFL with one game left to go in week 7.

  I added up the wins and losses this morning and as a division the A.F.C. East
is something like 19-16 which comes to 3 more wins than losses against teams
from other divisions. The A.F.C. West is up 2 games while the A.F.C. Central is
down 4. 

  Over in the N.F.C., one division is down 1 game (the East I think) while the
other two are even with the same number of wins and losses. 

  Adding up the wins and losses by conference the A.F.C. is +1 in the win
column and the N.F.C. is -1 in the win column. 

  Of course the teams don't play balanced schedules and this is only 7 weeks
into the season so take the numbers for what they are worth. 

  George 
9.2464He almost keelt Denver single-handed way backPTOS01::JACOBRIt's nobody's fault but mine....Mon Oct 17 1994 21:5314
    Former STEELER and current(until today, that is) Bears running back
    Merril Hoge retired from football today.
    
    Hoge had suffered 2 concussions this season(and one last year) and is
    still having dizzy spells and experiencing memory loss from the one he
    suffered 2 weeks ago.  Hoge had seen specialists here in Pittsburgh
    earlier this week, and after performing numerous tests on him they told
    him that he could suffer a very serious injury if he were to play again
    and recieve another concussion.  Hoge also, reportedly, talked with
    other former NFL players who had had their careers cut short by
    concussions.
    
    JaKe
    
9.2465CNTROL::CHILDSDwayne Barry KNOWS!Tue Oct 18 1994 11:404
 dam those Patriots they cost me a perfect week in the Pool.........

 mike
9.2467CAMONE::WAYCharge men, for God's sake, Charge!Tue Oct 18 1994 11:4726
I have a question:


	Why is the taunting/celebration rule not more consistently applied?

	This was a topic of discussion on the FAN last night, but I 
	arrived at my destination before it was discussed, but I thought it
	was a good one.

	The basis of discussion was that two weeks ago, a long reception
	by Chris Calloway was called back to the line of scrimmage and
	then some, after he spiked the ball and trash-talked a little to
	a New Orleans DB.

	Sunday, Neon Deion picks off a pass, takes it 93 yards for the
	score, and the last 20 yards he's strutting and taunting the Falcon's
	bench.

Is there a double standard?


Kind of going along with all of that, in the games I've seen so far this
year, the officiating seems really inconsistent from game to game.


Any comments?
9.2468GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Tue Oct 18 1994 11:578
    I cannot understand why stuff like dunking the ball over the goalposts
    or a prearranged sack dance isn't considered taunting. If I was a
    defensive player and some WR that just scored on me would jump up to
    dunk the ball over the goal post, I'd HAVE to low bridge him and drop
    him on his haid, just for GPs. 
    
    Dennis Faust
     
9.2469some refs have low tolerence pointsCNTROL::CHILDSDwayne Barry KNOWS!Tue Oct 18 1994 11:578
 of course there's a double standard. Depends upon your star quality. Also
 if you're coach is a whiner (Reeves most definately is) the refs like to
 get even with you the coach when they can. They also like to see the veins 
 in the coach's neck buldge.  ;^) 

 No way Dieon should have made that inty. He and Rison should have been
 tossed for that sissyass fight.
9.2470cliches 'r usMKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Tue Oct 18 1994 12:3215
    'No-taunting' rules are ridiculous IMHO.  Hell, if the guy can 
    'walk his walk' then he deserves to 'talk his talk'.  If he can't
    then he only succeeds in making a fool of himself.  
    
    Let a defensive end do his little dance after making a huge sack, but
    he damn well better be ready to watch the offensive lineman do the same
    when he makes a good block on the same DE that springs a running back.
    What comes around goes around.
    
    Don't try and tell me that if they didn't try and do away with the
    taunting then the game would get more volitile.  This ain't no 
    game of tidly winks!  
    
    
    billl
9.2471HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 12:5623
  The no celebrating rule is one of the most blatant examples of racisism in
sports. Face it, players have been celebrating touchdowns ever since football
began and they still do. Homecoming is one giant celebration which is mostly
football oriented and it's a time honored tradition. None of these activities
has ever been called into question. 

  What happened was that a couple decades ago black athletes started doing
celebrations that were not lily white in nature and steeped in college
tradition and the NFL, aware that the TV audience was mostly white and a good
part racist, decided to put a stop to it with the no celebration rule. 

  Do you think that Major League baseball considered a no celebration rule when
Yogi Bera ran out and jumped on Don Larson after his perfect game? Heck no, but
one or two Mosy Shuffles in the end zone was all it took to get the good ol'
boys who run the NFL to come up with this ridiculous rule. 

  All teams celebrate after touchdowns and the rule is clear, if it's a
traditional white type of celebration it's fine but if it hints at the afro
American culture, it's off limits.

  The no celebration rule is a disgrace to football and should be abolished. 

  George 
9.2472"Couple decades ago", "put a stop to it"... pure fiction...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 18 1994 13:1819
> What happened was that a couple decades ago black athletes started doing
> celebrations that were not lily white in nature and steeped in college
> tradition and the NFL, aware that the TV audience was mostly white and a good
> part racist, decided to put a stop to it with the no celebration rule. 
    
    You're entitled to your opinions, but you severely undermine them with
    something as innacurate as the above.  There is not a blanket 
    no-celebration rule in the NFL.  There is a no-taunting rule, however, 
    and I think that rule was stiffened, but only in the last few years.  
    Apparently the NFL hasn't done a very good job in applying that rule 
    liberally as part of its racial conspiracy because on any given 
    Sunday all manner of such celebrations are evident, go unpenalized 
    and have so for years (even the no-taunting penalty is rarely called).  
    In fact the NFL separated itself from the college game a long time 
    ago on what it permits in its endzones.
    
    glenn
    
9.2473HANNAH::ASHEand now... the end is near...Tue Oct 18 1994 13:212
    Uh, I thought the taunting rule came from guys like Mark Gastineau
    first.
9.2474CAMONE::WAYCharge men, for God's sake, Charge!Tue Oct 18 1994 13:447
Yeah, I was just going to say that.

Gastineau's "Sack Dance" was instrumental in the no taunting rule.  Last time
I checked, Mark was white....


'Saw
9.2475HANNAH::ASHEand now... the end is near...Tue Oct 18 1994 13:513
    ... I guess only Brigitte Nielsen and his ex-wife would know for
    sure...
    
9.2476HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 13:5221
  I'm just going by what I see and as you say where it is applied.

  People have been arguing and fighting in sports for many years and no one
ever made a rule to stop it if it didn't come to actual blows. It was about the
time that athletes started personalizing end zone celebrations and adding dance
type steps that suddenly for the 1st time rules started appearing limiting what
someone could do in the end zone after scoring a touch down.

  It seems to me that if someone scores a touchdown they should be able to jump
around in any manner that they feel so moved to do. What's wrong with spiking
the ball over the cross bar, on the ground, dancing around or anything else? 

  Now if they haul off and slug a guy from the other team, sure throw them out
of the game, but as long as no one gets punched, why limit celebrations in any
way at all?

  Say what you like, I'm skeptical about the motivation behind this rule. No
other sport limits celebration and certainly no one limits traditional types
of celebration like jumping up and down, piling on team mates that score, etc.

  George
9.2478SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Oct 18 1994 14:168
|  is one thing but pre-planned MC Hammer imitations are another.

Many of these guys are mugging it up for the cameras, not 
celebrating.  It is their continued shot at fame.  Notice
how many guys are ripping their helmets off after a TD 
these days?

=Bob=
9.2479ODIXIE::ZOGRANThese boys need a house!Tue Oct 18 1994 14:1612
    -.1 I agree.  Every highlight film that you see has someone in the
    endzone holding their hands up, asking the crowd to look at them, as
    if they were the first person on the face of the earth to score a TD. 
    Even the high school kids are doing it!  A game winning TD maybe
    deserves a celebration, but not every TD, tackle, interception or 15+
    yard run.  Give the ref the ball and get back to the d*** huddle.
    
    My .02.
    
    UMDan
    
    
9.2480Are you intentionally starting trouble???AD::HEATHNo please not Kevin KennedyTue Oct 18 1994 14:1712
      
    
    George so if what you are saying is true there should have been a flag
    on Joe Carter's series ending homerun in 93 and they should've brough it
    back and replayed the pitch????  Get real Billy "Whiteshoes" Johnson
    was one of the first real dancers that I remember and he was long
    retired before the no taunting rule came into effect.  Prime Slime was
    really goin at it after his int return for a TD and the only penalty he
    got was a strained groin.  Looks to me like your trying to start
    something that isn't there.
    
    Jerry
9.2481Is Tim McCarver in the building? (that's a taunt, George ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 18 1994 14:208
                 
    I still can't believe that Deion Sanders didn't get bounced for that
    actual _fight_, though.  They can pretty much toss out any no-fighting, 
    no-taunting-before-there's-a-fight and any other rule if they're not
    going to enforce that.
    
    glenn
     
9.2482HANNAH::ASHEand now... the end is near...Tue Oct 18 1994 14:2514
>  Say what you like, I'm skeptical about the motivation behind this rule. No
>other sport limits celebration and certainly no one limits traditional types
>of celebration like jumping up and down, piling on team mates that score, etc.
    
    Baseball has it by the next pitch being chin music...
    
    Basketball does it (in theory) by giving T's for taunting and hanging
    on the rim...
    
    Hockey would do it by cold cocking the guy up side the haid...
    
    Wrasslin' does it by the puny runt manager hitting the guy from
    behind...
    
9.2483HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 14:2535
  So when Yogie Berra ran out and jumped in Don Larson's arms after the last
pitch of his perfect game was that tacky? Should Berra have just rolled the
ball back toward the mound and headed off toward the shower? 

  American football is always being compared to soccer, is it tacky when the
guy who just scored a goal sprints in front of the goalie with both arms in the
air while the announcers yells "gooooooooooalllllll"? Should he just trot back
to his position after the ball goes in the net? 

  What about when Elway was celebrating last night after he scored? What about
when Marino sprints down the field after a touchdown pass and piles on the guy
who caught the ball? 

  Celebrating in sports happens all the time. Every touchdown, field goal,
soccer goal, run in a close world series game etc, etc, results in players
jumping around, piling on each other, waving their arms in the air, jumping up
and down, etc, etc, etc. 

  The only rule I've ever seen limiting any of this is the "Hammer" style end
zone celebration in football.

  The idea that celebration incites fights is ridiculous. If someone is stupid
enough to let the other team score they deserve to have someone get in their
face. If the other team doesn't do it the coach sure will when the player
gets back to the bench.

  Celebrating scores in sports is fundamental to a game. The whole point of
having sports is to have fun and celebrate when you win. Why not let a player
who just caught a 50 yard pass slam dunk it over the cross bar?

  If America is suppose to be the land of freedom, why should there be more
restrictions on American football celebrations than there are on European
football celebrations?

  George
9.2484put an end to this nonsense57042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 18 1994 14:338
So George you are compaining that the call is not made consistently? well
welcome to the REAL world! Remember you started by claiming the rule 
was put in because of racism; now you're slowly but surely backing off
another far-fetched idea (which we all assume by now is just to stir things
up) and going back to the age old complaint of ITS NOT FAIR.

The Crazy Met

9.2485CAMONE::WAYCharge men, for God's sake, Charge!Tue Oct 18 1994 14:4311
One of the points brought up on FAN last night was that Gastineau would
do his sack dance even if the Jets were down 35-7.

I guess the concept of TEAM has weakened over the years, and the concept
of I-I-me-me has grown.

Berra running to congratulate Larsen was just that.  Yogi wasn't over in
front of the Dodgers bench wagging a finger at them......  Big difference.


'Saw
9.2487SOLANA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesTue Oct 18 1994 14:592
    
    Bring back Elmo Wright!
9.2488FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Oct 18 1994 15:196
    It amazes me how people take so many trivial things and attempt to tie
    them into racism.  Like the thought of an emotional athlete expressing
    themselves in an emotional game never occurred.
    
    get a grip,
    Mike
9.2489You've made the point why there's some place for sportsmanshipEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Oct 18 1994 15:2614
    >> If someone is stupid enough to let the other team score they deserve 
    >> to have someone get in their face. If the other team doesn't do it 
    >> the coach sure will when the player gets back to the bench.
    >
    >   That's the first time that I've seen scoring directly and completely
    >   equated to mental acuity.
    
    That bizarre statement stood out for me, too.  So much for "the whole
    point of having sports is to have fun".  "Fun" if you're not the 
    "stupid" one "deserving" to have someone in your face...
    
    glenn
    
9.2490Just an opinionELMAGO::BENBACAAtDEC18Years.ItAllEndsNovember18th.Tue Oct 18 1994 15:319
    Hey, what ever happened to the real "touchdowns"? The  word itself
    implies scoring and touching the ball down on the turf on one knee 
    like in the olden days. :-)
    
    Seriously though,
    
    I think spiking the ball is good enough. The dancing and showing off 
    should be limited to doing it on your teams side of  the field, not 
    the endzone or the  field of play.
9.2491HANNAH::ASHEand now... the end is near...Tue Oct 18 1994 15:344
    There's a big difference between something choreographed and something
    spontaneous.  If Berra runs to the mound and he and Larson do the World
    Series Shuffle on the mound, that's bad. 
    
9.2492HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 15:4518
  Geez, talk about hitting the hot button. 

  Who cares if someone celebration appears to be choreographed?

  This is America. We are suppose to be setting the standard of freedom of
expression for the world. This is suppose to be the place where people say
what they think or feel and others deal with it rather than suppressing
expression to keep things neat and pretty.

  And the NFL exists so that 1100 guys can get exercise? Winning means nothing?
I like that. 

  Do away with all celebration rules and let people celebrate the way they
want. If someone starts a fight because they let someone score then didn't like
their celebration, that's the guy who should get tossed. Rather than starting a
fight he should score then do his own celebration. 

  George
9.2493Taunting & celebration are differentPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Oct 18 1994 15:5419
  I don't think taunting has any place in sports. What Deon Sanders did and
  said a couple of days ago was very distasteful to me. Actions like his,
  really turn me off to the NFL. That's just part of the reason why I seem to
  watch more and more college football and less and less pro football every
  year. He shouldda been tossed when he started the fight and he shouldda
  been tossed as he taunted the whole Atlanta team.

  Excessive celebration is another thing all together and id quite different 
  from taunting. I thing it's a horrible rule. If a celebration interferes 
  with the game, they can call delay of the game but 15 yards is too much. 
  I'm not aware of any excessive celebrations calls in pro football but 
  college ball had 2 mind boggling calls this year. One was when Syracuse came 
  back from a 28 point deficit and took the lead in the final minute. The 15 
  yard penaly allowed Oklahoma to kick the winning field goal on the last play. 
  The other came after the Colorado Hail Mary in Michigan. At least that one 
  had no affect on the game. What do they expect the players to do after 
  making an amazing comeback or winning the game on the last play ?

	Keith
9.2494HANNAH::ASHEand now... the end is near...Tue Oct 18 1994 16:2616
    There was a play in a Giants game this year where Cris Calloway caught
    a ball around the opponent's 10 yard line.  He got up and spiked the
    ball near a defender.  He got hit with an unsportsmanlike conduct call
    and instead of 1st and goal at the 10, it was at the 25... they didn't
    score and it cost them the game.  It must have been against NO.  Was
    it taunting?  Was it a celebration?  It was pale to what Deion did
    over the weekend.
    
    Letting them settle it on their own leads to what Dale Hunter did to
    Pierre Turgeon in the '93 playoffs.  He gave him a cheap shot, Turgeon
    misses the rest of the playoffs and the Islanders get eliminated in the
    next round.  Someone needs to take the reins of the game and keep it
    under control.
    
    If you want to go to Berra's time, didn't they shut down Jimmy Piersall
    after he ran the bases backwards after a HR?
9.249557042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Oct 18 1994 16:286
Walt, that case was even worse. The penalty, if I recall negated
the entire play and the yards were marked off from where the play
began.

The Crazy Met

9.2496HANNAH::ASHEand now... the end is near...Tue Oct 18 1994 16:291
    That's right... I forgot...
9.2497HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 16:3820
RE       <<< Note 9.2494 by HANNAH::ASHE "and now... the end is near..." >>>

>    If you want to go to Berra's time, didn't they shut down Jimmy Piersall
>    after he ran the bases backwards after a HR?

  As I recall Piersall was committed to a mental institution during his 1st
season after losing his grip on reality and freaking out during or after one of
the games. It wasn't really a celebration, more a case of cracking due to the
pressure. 

  It seems to me that if you punch, kick or otherwise attack a player then
sure, bounce him from the game. If a player throws the ball or anything else
at a player then fine I have no problem with cracking down on that.

  What I don't like the rule that seems to limit the celebration in the end
zone when no opponent is really involved. So what if someone wants to take
off their helmet, dance around, and spike the ball over the cross bar? Where's
the harm?

  George
9.2498CNTROL::CHILDSDwayne Barry KNOWS!Tue Oct 18 1994 16:4411
>  What I don't like the rule that seems to limit the celebration in the end
> zone when no opponent is really involved. So what if someone wants to take
> off their helmet, dance around, and spike the ball over the cross bar? Where's
> the harm?

  sets a bad example for young impressionable minds. I for one think this is a
  bad thing.

 mike

9.2499HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 16:547
  Yea, we can't have our young people going around taking off their hats,
dancing, and doing make believe slam dunks when ever they get happy. 

  That's what the NFL is, it's an organization dedicated to keeping hats
on kids during times of random celebration.

  George
9.2501CNTROL::CHILDSDwayne Barry KNOWS!Tue Oct 18 1994 17:108
 there used to be a thing called sportsmanship. Obviously you don't think that
 counts for anything. it's cool to celebrate and kick a man when he's down is
 your opinion. Sad very sad. I'm not against the kids or the pros celebrating
 but do it together with your teammates on the sideline where you're not trying
 to show someone up. 

 mike
9.2502HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 17:1326
RE        <<< Note 9.2500 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>      George, I think I'm safe in saying that you're the only person 
>      on the entire planet that feels just a smidge freer because
>      Deion can strut and cut after a touchdown.

  Ok, so I'm waiting but I'm not hearing an answer. Where's the harm? So what
if someone celebrates after scoring? Who gets harmed? How is anyone's life
worse after a celebration?

  Say that you were giving the closing argument in a civil case and you were
trying to convince a jury to award money damages to your client to harm
inflicted because Dion Sanders showed off after a touch down. What's the tragic
story you would tell about your client that would bring tears to the eyes of
the jury and compel them to award your client the fortune of which you would
get your 1/3rd? 
  
>      Sports, George, sports. That was the original statement, you're 
>      stated belief that sports exist for the purpose of winning then
>      celebrating. 

  This note is the NFL note and the topic is restrictions on celebrations after
scoring touchdowns. Scoring leads to winning and "in this league, winning is
everything". Not my words. 

  George
9.2503HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 17:1517
RE           <<< Note 9.2501 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Dwayne Barry KNOWS!" >>>

> there used to be a thing called sportsmanship. Obviously you don't think that
> counts for anything. it's cool to celebrate and kick a man when he's down is
> your opinion. Sad very sad. I'm not against the kids or the pros celebrating
> but do it together with your teammates on the sideline where you're not trying
> to show someone up. 

  When did I ever say I was in favor of kicking someone? In fact I stated a
few notes earlier that I am all in favor of tossing someone from the game if
they strike, kick, or throw something at another player.

  What I'm talking about is end zone celebrations which seem to be restricted
by the NFL even when they don't involve players from the other team. What's
wrong with that?

  George
9.2504CNTROL::CHILDSDwayne Barry KNOWS!Tue Oct 18 1994 17:2211
 please George don't tell me that you didn't realize that kick a man while
 he's down is just an expression and not the actual act. Also when did the
 NFL restrick them from celebrating? I see guys dancing all the time so where's
 the restriction? Sure they might have a rule but they certainly don't enforce
 it. 

 some guys will do anything to read themselves in print......


 mike 
9.2505FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Oct 18 1994 17:245
   >> This is America. We are suppose to be setting the standard of 
   >> freedom of expression for the world. This is suppose to be the 
    
    such a freedom is no longer a freedom when it infringes on someone
    else's freedom.  This is probably the intent of the NFL taunting rule.
9.2506GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsTue Oct 18 1994 17:277
    
    George,
    
    	Do you mind if I hum "America the Beautiful" whilst I read
    	some of your notes?
    
    Claybone
9.2507Flag on the ployBSS::MENDEZTue Oct 18 1994 17:349
    Psssst, hey sprotsters....
    
    It seems perfectly clear that George is "taunting" you and should be
    given a fifteen yard penalty.  Of course the other alternative is to
    just IGNORE him and eventually he'll stop.  The first assertion of
    "racism" in sports is laughable at best.
    
    Frank "field judge" Mendez
    
9.2508The Piersall saga25022::BREENTue Oct 18 1994 17:3629
    Piersall was committed to the mental institution early in his career
    after suffering depression and acting very strangely culiminating in a
    famous fistfight under the stands with Billy Martin; I'd guess this was
    1952 (early, possibly 1951).
    
    He then came back and had a great 5 or so years with the RedSox moving
    from RightField to Centerfield after the Umphlett experiment ended and
    same was traded for Jensen of the Senators (Cronin's greatest move).
    
    Piersall engaged in many manic but entertaining incidents with the
    Redsox AFTER the institutionalization but was never considered insane
    but merely comically crazy and was immensely popular with Redsox fans.
    As another noter mentioned the Sox outfield of him,Jensen and Williams
    was one of the 10 best all time with jp and jj being tremendous and
    great and Ted being the one and only.  Piersall had an outstanding arm
    before foolishly indulding in a throwing contest with Willie Mays and
    hurting it.
    
    Piersall was traded to the Indians (Vic Wertz?) and later played in the
    National League where I believe the reverse trip occurred.  I would
    guess he was never "crazy" but merely had a severe depression and then
    a career marked by a love of fun.
    
    Goldenbrok's "FENWAY", (available as a loaner since I'm currently very
    space conscious) talks in some detail about Piersall.  There is no
    overstating his defensive skills even with the subsequent average arm
    and personally his year(s) in right were even more spectacular.
    
    Billte
9.2509HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 17:3718
Re         <<< Note 9.2505 by FRETZ::HEISER "Grace changes everything" >>>

>    such a freedom is no longer a freedom when it infringes on someone
>    else's freedom.  This is probably the intent of the NFL taunting rule.

  How so?

  I remember a few years back when guys would score a touchdown and start a
celebration that looked something like a dance. It was obviously practiced,
guys would jump up hit the other guy's hand, cross hands, etc. The NFL put
a stop to that by passing the end zone celebration rule.

  What I'm wondering and what I've always wondered is who was harmed by this
activity and why should it not be allowed? What's wrong with things like
"slam dunking" the ball over the cross bar? Why not just let the players
celebrate?

  George
9.2510FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Oct 18 1994 17:4310
9.2511HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 17:499
  But some of this dancing was actually quite good. Far more thought went into
those end zone dances than Dan Marino running down the field and falling on
the receiver that caught his pass.

  At any rate, there was obviously no harm in that type of celebration so
why make a rule against that when no other sport has rules against celebrations
after a score?

  George
9.2512CNTROL::CHILDSDwayne Barry KNOWS!Tue Oct 18 1994 17:527
 sure frank we realize this but if we don't play along, george might end up
 on the top of the Prudential with a 30 odd 6 pluggin' innocent predestrians
 or worst yet letting the air out of illegal psrked cars at the next football
 game..........

 ;^)
9.2513FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Oct 18 1994 17:5515
    It's like the most recent trend of players praying after scoring.  Some
    might have been offended by the sight.  I notice now that professing
    Christians from both teams meet on the field *after* the game is over
    to pray.  At least some of them are trying to be considerate.
    
    In similar manner, some (yeah they do still exist) might actually be 
    offended by certain pelvic gyrations.  Some might be offended of seeing
    someone flip the bird to the opponents after scoring.  Some might be
    offended when they read lips.  And if you can't dance your way out of a
    wet paper bag, you shouldn't subject others to such a display.
    
    These are freedoms of expression, but they aren't really free if they
    offend others.
    
    Mike
9.2514HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 18:0014
  How can someone be offended by dancing and not be offended by Dan Marino
running down the field and jumping up and down with his receiver.

  It seems that the only difference is the thought that went into the form
of the celebration.

  Now if they said no celebration at all was allowed and that after you score
there is no jumping, no back patting, just walk back to the bench then even
though it was stupid it would be fair but why not allow someone to dance?

  Here again, we're not talking about screaming in someone's face, only about
guys dancing in the endzone. Who's offended?

  George
9.2515FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Oct 18 1994 18:032
    I don't know who.  Some people are.  I *LIKED* Billy White Shoes
    Johnson's celebrations.
9.2516HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 18:079
  I liked those celebrations as well. I thought they added a lot to the game
and I was really pissed off when they made the rule stopping them.

  As I remember, the Mosey Shuffle was an attempt to get around the rule. As
I recall the rule said you couldn't jump but shuffling got you around the rule.

  Anyway, that rule is nuts, bring back the celebration dance!

  George
9.2517Mosey????BSS::MENDEZTue Oct 18 1994 18:255
    I've been watchin football for some time and have never heard of the
    "mosey shuffle".  I have heard of the "Ickey shuffle".  Who is this 
    "Mosey" guy anyway????
    
    
9.2518HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 18:285
  Ickey sounds right. It's been a while.

  What was the rest of his name, I forget.

  George
9.2519PTOS01::JACOBRIt's nobody's fault but mine....Tue Oct 18 1994 18:298
    Wasn't the original "taunting" rule put in after, I think it was the
    foreski....er...Redskins "Fun Bunch" would do their "dance", all what 6
    or 7 guys in a circle, and the Cowboys and other team took exception to
    it and started breaking it up themselves and starting fights by doind
    so????
    
    JaKe
    
9.252024661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingTue Oct 18 1994 18:294
    George do you own options on our hard disk drive suppliers?  You argue
    for argument's sake and add zero value to the discussion.
    
    Mark.
9.2521btw - maybe the "mosey" was Tatupu25022::BREENTue Oct 18 1994 18:415
    mark,
    	a friend of mine works for one of them dd suppliers.  I need a
    little fuel for some serious taunting next time I see him.
    
    bb
9.2522HTH'sWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Tue Oct 18 1994 18:443
    
    
    ICKEY Woods
9.2524HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 19:0418
RE      <<< Note 9.2520 by 24661::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing" >>>

>    George do you own options on our hard disk drive suppliers?  You argue
>    for argument's sake and add zero value to the discussion.
    
  Coming from you mark that's quite a criticism. The only time I ever see you
involved in a discussion it never has anything to do with sports. At least
I said something about a rule in a game that has to do with this note. Notice
that your comment above says nothing about that rule, nothing about football,
but as usual is no more than a complaint someone's notes.

  Give a little effort Mark. Say something, anything about football, the rules
of football, the people who play football, anything that doesn't involve me
or some other noter.

  You can't do it.

  George
9.2525HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 18 1994 19:0612
RE        <<< Note 9.2523 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>As for the
>     celebrations, it's about sportsmanship. Plain and simple.

  So if two guys score touchdowns, both celebrate in the endzone, both jump
around, but one had previously planned his moves, one is being a sportsmen
and the other is not?

  You are right, I will never understand the logic behind that.

  George
9.2526GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsTue Oct 18 1994 19:086
    
    	I motion that we replace the TM'd "@brokenrecord.com" with
    	a more suitable name..... "@maiewski.com".  Do I hear a
    	second?
    
    Claybone
9.2528TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinTue Oct 18 1994 19:1727
    
    
    
    	It must just be me, but I haven't noticed the NFL cracking down on
    endzone celebrations too much lately. On CNN Sports last night they
    showed about 4 or 5 crossbar 'dunks' from sunday's games. Or how about
    the Jets' Hasty running down to the endzone stands in Giants Stadium
    after the last Bledsoe sack on Sunday?
    
    	I seem to remember the goals of the anti-celebration/taunting rules
    were:
    
    	1) Put an end to the sack dances.
    
    	2) Players from the bench run into the endzone, and do a rehearsed
           dance number after a TD.
    
    	3) Stop players from spiking the ball between downs on big plays,
           as in the long reception that isn't a TD. (Isn't that an
           automatic unsportsman-like or delay-of-game penalty?)
    
    These rules stopped the celebrations from getting completely out of
    hand. But the TD celebrations haven't gone away. They are just quick
    spontaneous acts (for the most part) by the players involved.
    
    JimH
    
9.2529HANNAH::ASHEand now... the end is near...Tue Oct 18 1994 20:216
>  So if two guys score touchdowns, both celebrate in the endzone, both jump
>around, but one had previously planned his moves, one is being a sportsmen
>and the other is not?
    
    if it's directly in front of the other team and an "in your face" is
    attached, I'd say yeah...
9.2530SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Wed Oct 19 1994 11:0517
    
    	The comparison to Joe Carter hitting a world series winning home
    run is totally bogus. The rules are simple enough if they are just
    enforced. If you sack a guy, the guy should get back to his own huddle
    and smack heads with his own teammates to celebrate. There is no need
    for a Mark Gastineau sack dance.
    	Any spiking of the ball or mouthing off on a play that is not
    a TD, Should be a penalty. Again if you get back to the huddle and
    someone high fives you fine.
    	On TD's you should be able to spike the ball and celebrate with
    your teammates. No doing a dance in front of the crowd to get them
    wound up. No mouthing off to the other team.
    	When a WR catches a TD and then tosses the ball to the DB. It
    should be a taunting penalty. You know the WR is giving the DB %^&*,
    and mouthing off. We just can't hear it on TV.
    
    Ron
9.2531CAMONE::WAYCharge men, for God's sake, Charge!Wed Oct 19 1994 12:043
Claybone, my main!

I second it.....
9.2532HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 19 1994 13:1523
RE       <<< Note 9.2529 by HANNAH::ASHE "and now... the end is near..." >>>

>    if it's directly in front of the other team and an "in your face" is
>    attached, I'd say yeah...

  But what if it's not?

  What I remember and what really ticked me off was when restrictions were put
on guys doing end zone celebrations that didn't even involve players from other
teams. Sounds to me like a violation of their 1st amendment right to freedom
of expression. Hardly the "American" thing to do. Talk about setting a bad
example.

  As for the "in your face" stuff, if players don't want to see those things,
then all they have to do is prevent the other team from scoring touchdowns or
make big plays. Then the other team won't have anything to celebrate. 

  I can't stand the idea of rules who's sole purpose is to protect the feelings
of players who screw up and let the other team make a big play. I agree that
there are places where all the new touchie-feely protect the victim stuff makes
sense, but the grid iron is not one of them.

  George
9.253357042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Oct 19 1994 13:3410
>  Sounds to me like a violation of their 1st amendment right 

this coming from the person who argued (correctly I might add) that baseball
had the right to prevent or censure Marge Schott from saying racist things;
that the 1st amendment applies to the government making rules against
free speech and expression, and not private corporations.

The Crazy Met

9.2534HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 19 1994 14:0417
  No one is saying that the NFL doesn't have the right to suppress free speech
and free expression on the field. The question is, should they?

  People are always talking about how football and other sports should set
an example for kids. Well what worse example can you set then to send a message
to kids saying that organizations should control the right of the individual
to express themselves even when no harm is involved?

  Also, what kind of message is it to say to kids that if you fail to reach
your goal, don't try harder, just break up the other guy's celebration and
nag the authorities into making rules to protect your feelings from getting
hurt?

  I realize that we are currently living out the decade of the victim but do
we need that on the football field as well?

  George
9.2536GENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsWed Oct 19 1994 14:402
    
    	"from sea to shining seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeea! "
9.2537MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 19 1994 14:5513
>  No one is saying that the NFL doesn't have the right to suppress free speech
>and free expression on the field. The question is, should they?
>
   Yes, they should.

>  People are always talking about how football and other sports should set
>an example for kids. 
   Exactly the point.  Kids are using athletes as role models (they shouldn't,
 I agree), and it's appropriate for the powers that be in football legislating
 the type of behavior that is appropriate for anyone in public.

   I suppose George thinks it's OK for the guy who cuts me off on the freeway
 to stop and taunt me about it.
9.253857042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Oct 19 1994 15:228
> I suppose George thinks it's OK for the guy who cuts me off on the freeway
> to stop and taunt me about it.

yabbut, ANY Boston driver would view that as their god given right.

The Crazy Met

9.2539HANNAH::ASHEand now... the end is near...Wed Oct 19 1994 15:523
    So this is now an NFL debate, not one based on the fact that the rule
    was racist, right?
    
9.2540TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinWed Oct 19 1994 15:5515
    
    
>> I suppose George thinks it's OK for the guy who cuts me off on the freeway
>> to stop and taunt me about it.
>
>yabbut, ANY Boston driver would view that as their god given right.
    
    
    	No Boston driver worth his/her salt would "stop" and taunt. We do
    our taunting on the move. Lest we give back the positional advantage
    just gained by cutting somebody off!!!
    
    JimH :-)
    
    
9.2541HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 19 1994 15:5624
RE                     <<< Note 9.2537 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

>   I suppose George thinks it's OK for the guy who cuts me off on the freeway
> to stop and taunt me about it.

  Cutting someone off on the free way is against the law. Scoring a touchdown
is not only following the rules, it's the goal of what the offense is trying
to accomplish during a game.

  So what I'm hearing is that rules should be made against organized attempts
at celebration to protect the feelings of football players.

  Ok, so how about cheerleaders? After a touchdown they often do organized
cheers. Should the poor sensitive visiting players be protected from having
their feelings crushed by those wicked women after the home team scores 6
points? 

  And what about all those impressionable kids who see the cheer leaders
celebrating after a touchdown with their callous displays of rah-rah-rah,
taunting players by waving pom-poms in the air? How can we survive as a nation
with our youth feeling it's OK to be so cavalier throwing victory celebrations
on a moments notice?

  George
9.2542HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 19 1994 15:5913
RE       <<< Note 9.2539 by HANNAH::ASHE "and now... the end is near..." >>>

>    So this is now an NFL debate, not one based on the fact that the rule
>    was racist, right?
    
  Yes, I'm convinced that I was wrong when I suggested that the rule was
racist. 

  I now realize that the problem is that fans are concerned about the feelings
of football players being crushed by the callous celebration of players who
benefit from other players mistakes.

  George
9.2543CAMONE::WAYCharge men, for God's sake, Charge!Wed Oct 19 1994 16:087

	See George.

	See George debate.

	See George flagilate the expired equine.
9.2544... by the way it's "flagellate"HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 19 1994 16:2512
Re    <<< Note 9.2543 by CAMONE::WAY "Charge men, for God's sake, Charge!" >>>

>	See George.
>	See George debate.
>	See George flagilate the expired equine.

  DUCK!!

  Whooo, another flying towel from someone who realizes that they were wrong
but can't quite come out and say it in so many words.

  George
9.2545SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Oct 19 1994 16:305
| Title:  ... by the way it's "flagellate"
 
Personally, I prefer to flatulate...

=Bob= for JaKe 
9.2546HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 19 1994 16:343
  Or perhaps just flatten.

  George
9.2547CAMONE::WAYCharge men, for God's sake, Charge!Wed Oct 19 1994 17:3421
>  Whooo, another flying towel from someone who realizes that they were wrong
>but can't quite come out and say it in so many words.

Hey, George, pull your head outta there and tell me where I stated anything
that said anything about this debate?   I put in the original question
about the consistency of the rules, but have said nothing since.  I've
just sat back and watched.

I could see *possibly* being wrong if I'd engaged in the debate.  But
I didn't.....


And I know I misspelled that word but didn't bother to look it up.  If I
wasn't sure, I would have put (sp?) after it, but I figured it wasn't worth
the time since I figured it was wrong anyway.






9.2548HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 19 1994 17:353
  Gripe gripe gripe, complain complain complain.

  George
9.2549MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 19 1994 17:367
>   So what I'm hearing is that rules should be made against organized attempts
> at celebration to protect the feelings of football players.

    We don't really know what you are hearing, but that isn't what is being
  said.  Can you find an instance where someone said these rules should be
  passed to protect the feelings of football players, or is that a straw man
  you've invented to shore up a weak argument ?
9.2550HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Oct 19 1994 18:3052
RE                     <<< Note 9.2549 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

>  Can you find an instance where someone said these rules should be
>  passed to protect the feelings of football players, or is that a straw man
>  you've invented to shore up a weak argument ?

  How about the two listed below? 

  What I'm trying to understand is just why there is a rule against players
celebrating after a score. I understand that my 1st impression was wrong and
that it's not racial bias against the players. 

  Now I seem to hear that people are concerned players taunting other players.
What harm does a taunt cause other than hurting someone's feelings. Remember
"sticks and stones ..."?

  If that's not right then why is there rule against celebrations? What
possible harm could they cause? If they cause no harm, why have a rule against
them? 

  George

Two Examples of people complaining about taunts by football players.

                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 9.2530            The National Football League (NFL)           2530 of 2549
SNAX::ERICKSON "Yes I Am !!!"                        17 lines  19-OCT-1994 08:05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>    	On TD's you should be able to spike the ball and celebrate with
>    your teammates. No doing a dance in front of the crowd to get them
>    wound up. No mouthing off to the other team.
>    	When a WR catches a TD and then tosses the ball to the DB. It
>    should be a taunting penalty. You know the WR is giving the DB %^&*,
>    and mouthing off. We just can't hear it on TV.

and
    
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 9.2535            The National Football League (NFL)           2535 of 2549
MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!"            10 lines  19-OCT-1994 11:38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
>     Why are you people debating with someone who lumped Yogi 
>    Berra jumping for joy after the last pitch of Don Larsen's 
>    perfect game in with Deion dancing and prancing after a touch-
>    down in a rout in a mid-season game? 
9.2551MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 20 1994 11:4733
>>  Can you find an instance where someone said these rules should be
>>  passed to protect the feelings of football players, or is that a straw man
>>  you've invented to shore up a weak argument ?
>
>  How about the two listed below? 

   Wrong !  Try again !  Neither of these two said anything about the reason
   behind the rule.  In the former case, if one reads the whole note, rather
   than the extract, it appears the author is only explaining how the current
   rule, as written, should be enforced, if abided strictly to its written
   description; it says nothing at all about the author's opinion on whether
   it's a good or bad rule.  The second says nothing about his opinion of the
   rule, either; he's only trying to razz you a little.

>  If that's not right then why is there rule against celebrations? What
>possible harm could they cause? If they cause no harm, why have a rule against
>them? 

   Let me try to explain it again, perhaps more simply so it sinks in.
   The NFL does not create these rules to protect the feelings of players on
   the other side; they do it to create an image in the minds of the public,
   an image of good sportsmanship, rather than bad.  Whether you agree with
   it or not, that is what the motivation is.

   What harm could it cause ?  If enough kids used the super-jerks as role
   models, as well as the attitudes displayed in other settings (movies, TV,
   as well as sports), it could contribute to a decline in societal values
   among the youth of today.  Or, it could contribute to a loss of supplemental
   income if parents stopped buying NFL apparel, etc., deciding that the
   prime role models therein are classless jerks.  In any case, this is about
   image, money, and ratings, not about any feelings of players on the field,
   I can assure you of that; NFL management isn't that interested in players'
   feelings.
9.2552HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 20 1994 12:3629
RE                     <<< Note 9.2551 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

>   The NFL does not create these rules to protect the feelings of players on
>   the other side; they do it to create an image in the minds of the public,
>   an image of good sportsmanship, rather than bad.  

  In what way is doing an organized dance in the end zone bad sportsmanship? 

  Two guys catch footballs, break tackles and run into the endzone. On both
cases their team mates run into the endzone and they celebrate. The only
difference is that the 1st group is doing random high fives and bashing helmets
while the 2nd group does a preplaned dance of sorts. In both cases the
cheerleaders do an organized dance type celebration. 

  In what way is that good sportsmanship by one team and bad sportsmanship by
the other? So a couple guys jump up in the air twice, cross their hands and
clap in some weird way, so what? Why should that sort of thing be banned? 

>   What harm could it cause ?  If enough kids used the super-jerks as role
>   models, as well as the attitudes displayed in other settings (movies, TV,
>   as well as sports), it could contribute to a decline in societal values
>   among the youth of today.  

  I think this is reaching a bit. The harm done by sending the message that
freedom of expression should not be allowed far outweighs any harm that could
be caused by kids dancing instead of doing random high fives as a form of
celebration.

  George
9.2553"break dance somewhere else !AIMHI::KCUMMINGSThu Oct 20 1994 12:445
    
    
    High fives, pat on the back, hand shake etc is fine.
    
    Leave the MTV look at me one two three for the Bahama beach club.
9.2554MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 20 1994 13:036
	Nothing's wrong with it.  I'm not arguing for the ban on celebrations.
	I'm just explaining to you that the rule has nothing to do with the
	feelings of players on the other side.  It's about image.  I don't
	have to agree that what the NFL is doing actually does promote the
	image they want, but I can still recognize that your arguments were
	bogus.
9.2556HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 20 1994 14:1711
  Well fine. My point is that I don't like the restrictions on celebrations as
long as they don't involve attacking the other team's players so if we agree on
that then I don't care about their reasoning. 

  I was of the impression that some felt that those preplaned types of
celebrations taunted other players. Someone mentioned Dallas breaking up one of
those celebrations and the rule being put in place to prevent fights. Seems
that the rule should be don't fight with players who are celebrating. Players
should go figure out what they did wrong and prevent them score next time. 

  George 
9.2557"enought already"AIMHI::KCUMMINGSThu Oct 20 1994 14:4011
    
    
    I guess my point is, it's ok to celebrate but there's a fine line...
    
    I mean high fives hand shakes, number one held in the air etc...
    
    However, when it get to the point of naming dances (ickey shuffle, and 
    carrying on as such....There's just no place for it....I put it in the hot
    doggin category.  Let's keep it a sporting event, not a dance show.
    
    jmho
9.2558DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Thu Oct 20 1994 15:389
    	
    
    
    
    
    
    			LDUC alert!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
    
    
9.255924661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingThu Oct 20 1994 16:027
                     <<< Note 9.2556 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>

>  Well fine. My point is that I don't like the restrictions on celebrations as
>long as they don't involve attacking the other team's players so if we agree on
>that then I don't care about their reasoning. 
    
    Triple negative....YES!
9.2560HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 20 1994 16:1413
  By god you did it again. Another note that has nothing what ever to do with
sports.

  Come on Mark, 'fess up. You have a bet that you can put note after note into
this file without ever saying anything about sports, leagues, rules, equipment,
or anything else related to Sports, right?

  Prove me wrong, say anything at all about football, the rules of football,
stadiums, players, games past or present, teams, anything.

  You can't do it, you'll lose your bet.

  George
9.2562The small short dances are fine, but the 2 min productions arntMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Oct 20 1994 16:2619
    Mark Gastaneua(SP) and the Fun Bunch were some of the earlier one's
    that started all this... Face it, there's no need to celebrate every
    sack, TD etc.. I mean TD's happen all the time, its the once a game
    type things that the celbrating doesnt bother me (Even the Dion Dance)
    
    The planned and practiced type dances in the endzone should get a FINE
    as well as a flag... Didnt they Allow Ickey to do his dance on the
    SideLine :-) (Kind of loses a little...).
    
    The Rule Is to STOP FIGHTS, you cant defeine each type of incident so
    you have one blanket rule, I think they Under Enforce it... OF course
    what does it matter if your going to allow a star (Dion) to throw
    punches and not get tossed...
    
    Oh and man I wish someone had told me sooner that I could just put an
    (sp) or how about a (gr) when I have grammer errors :-)
    From this point on (sp) and (gr) are assumed on all mab notes :-)
    
    								MaB
9.2563moderatorsBSS::MENDEZThu Oct 20 1994 16:361
    Is it possible to put this discussion in the junk note?
9.2564HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 20 1994 16:399
RE                       <<< Note 9.2563 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>
                                -< moderators >-

>    Is it possible to put this discussion in the junk note?

  Are you referring to the talk about the no celebration rule or Tommy and
Mark's constant complaining about my noting style?

  George
9.2565why caint we just ...HBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsThu Oct 20 1994 16:547
Hey, there's too few of us still noting at all to worry about junk. :-(.

That there Frank Mendez has way too much time on his hands in Colorado
Springs. Skiing and basketball seasons are not quite underway and the
Donks are dropping like the thermometer. 8=).

TTom
9.2566so what else is new?FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Oct 20 1994 16:554
    >    From this point on (sp) and (gr) are assumed on all mab notes :-)
    
    our decoder rings handle these with ease.  The problem is that we
    sometimes forget them at home.
9.2567HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 20 1994 17:0318
Re                 <<< Note 9.2562 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>

>    The Rule Is to STOP FIGHTS, you cant defeine each type of incident so
>    you have one blanket rule, I think they Under Enforce it... OF course
>    what does it matter if your going to allow a star (Dion) to throw
>    punches and not get tossed...
    
  This is exactly right.

  Rather than making rules about dancing all they have to do is crack down on
anyone who throws a punch the way they did in the past. You throw a punch, you
take a shower. Do it again, you sit out 3 games. Next time it's a season,
even if it's a big ticket name like Dion Sanders.

  There will always be fights, but that type of structure seems to keep it
to a minimum.

  George
9.2568What Dion hit some, $25 fine and No free Donuts for a weekMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Oct 20 1994 17:1512
    Question is do these guys still get paid if there Kicked out of a game?
    And if there tossed for 3 games do they lose there pay for all 3 games?
    
    If they get paid on a 17 or 20 Week schedule (so 1.7mil a year is 100K)
    and they get tossed for 3 games could they lose 300K...
    
    They need to fine the players more, and you cant fine them 1K,5K 10K
    becuase the RICHER guys wont care as much.  But fine them 5% of there
    overall contract for there first offense and another 10% for there
    second and these guys wont be throwing any punches...
    
    								mab
9.2569HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 20 1994 17:248
  Yeah, if it becomes a problem.

  Right now there don't seem to be many fights in football. Baseball has brawls
and bean ball problems, hockey still has fights, but football has been pretty
tame lately.

  "Ain't broke" and all that,
  George
9.2570TTom how's networks sales goin???BSS::MENDEZThu Oct 20 1994 17:3710
    Hey TTOM
    
    Whats up, The hornets ain't even gonna get out of the gate.  Your
    Beloved NCState basketball team sips discretely,  The UNC soccer team
    just lost their winning streak,  Knorr isn't around to bust on, and
    you pick on the DONKS?  It must be pretty sad when you have to start
    cheering on the Panthers.  Anyway TTOM thanks for reminding me that
    this is the "Sprots Bar" and youse cain discuss anythin you want any
    where.
    
9.2571oh and ughHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsThu Oct 20 1994 18:2110
Hey Farnk I aint in Sales ;-)

You overplayed it a bit with that UNC Soccer thang, though. Re-read ACC
and I think you'll know where I stand on any misfortune concerning Chapel
Hill.

The real sad thing, however, about rootin for the Panthers is having to
go to Clemson to see the  games the firsted year.

TTom
9.2572SOLANA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesThu Oct 20 1994 19:419
    
                <<< Note 9.2562 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
    
    >    Oh and man I wish someone had told me sooner that I could just put an   
    >   (sp) or how about a (gr) when I have grammer errors :-)
    
    Not really.  You are assuming you know when you make an error.
    
    brews
9.2573;-)FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Oct 20 1994 19:441
    
9.2574SOMEONE WILL KNOCK THE NEON OUT OF DEION!!!WMOIS::FASSETT_ENothing beats a Bud MAN!!!Thu Oct 20 1994 20:4811
    I think that what pisses me most off is not the fact that Neon Deon 
    celebrates in the endzone after a touchtown, but the fact thta he does
    the highstepping/dancing/taunting way before he gets there. If I was
    one of the Falcons on the sidelines as he was doing his dance down the
    sidelines last Sunday, I would have risked the fine and or suspension
    and come off the sidelines and blasted Neon Deion and then beat the
    living sh!t out of him. If you score a touchdown then go ahead and
    celebrate all you want, but wait until you are in the endzone before
    your celebration starts- 	or just ask LEON LETT BOUT THAT!!!!!
    FAST EDDIE
    
9.2575HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 21 1994 12:394
  The drum major runs onto the field like that during half time, should he
be taken out back and beaten as well?

  George
9.2576ODIXIE::ZOGRANHappy Happy, Joy JoyFri Oct 21 1994 12:434
    Yes. Soundly.
    
    UMDan
    
9.2577ELMAGO::BENBACAAtDEC18Years.ItAllEndsNovember18th.Fri Oct 21 1994 12:516
    Beat the drum major with the baton!

    Seriously though, Lett wasn't celebrating, he didn't get the  chance
    to. However he was showing off and paid the ultimate price by being
    denied the TD and instead he got embarrassed world wide. He has since
    more that made up for it.
9.2578HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 24 1994 15:3016
  I added up the wins and losses by division again (dull paper this morning
I guess)

  Subtracting total losses from total wins it went something like:

      A.F.C.    N.F.C.
East     +2        -1
Cent     -3        -1
West     +3         0
       ------    -----
         +2        -2

  Again, factoring in the unbalanced schedules detracts from much of the
significance but it keeps me amused while Patty is reading her horoscope. 

  George
9.2579HANNAH::ASHEAll I wanna do, is chew some gumMon Oct 24 1994 15:575
    Ok, can someone explain the rule to me on the  100+punt return
    yesterday in the Ram game?  I thought if the ball bounced in the end
    zone on a punt, it was an automatic touchback.  I guess the Saints did
    too.  What happened there?
    
9.2580MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Oct 24 1994 16:015
    
        It's not an automatic touchback. It's only down if it is
       downed by either team or a fair catch is called and the
       receiver elects to let the ball pass into the end zone.
       It is perfectly legal to field the ball in the end zone.
9.2581OK but too many RamsHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsMon Oct 24 1994 16:0313
The ruling, which may or may not be the rule, is that the ball is in play
until it is either downed or goes outta bounds.

Since neither occurred, it was fair game for whoever picked it up. The
whistle hadn't blown.

The real error with the run back was not that it was illegal for the Rams
to pick up but the fack that most of the Rams' special teams was leaving
the field while the D was walking on. There's no way that only 11 Rams
were on the field. ESPN had a shot showing 2 or 3 players already coming
on the field.

TTom
9.2582BIGQ::MCKAYMon Oct 24 1994 16:034
    Why wouldn't you be able to run back a punt in the end zone?  Same
    as a kick off, at your own risk.  
    
    jimbo
9.2583HANNAH::ASHEAll I wanna do, is chew some gumMon Oct 24 1994 16:235
    I've never seen it done, that's all.  I've seen balls fumbled into it
    and brought out, but never seen it picked and run out on a punt.
    First time it's been done in the NFL.  Longest punt return before that
    was 98 yds...
    
9.2584DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Oct 24 1994 16:308
    	Similar thing happened back when I was in college. Kicking
    	team kicked the ball to Cle Montgomery (Wilbert's brother
    	and almost as good). Ball rolled to about the one yard
    	line. Kicking team pulled up when they saw Cle wasn't going
    	to run with it (they must have thought the ball went out
    	of bounds). Anyway, he ran it back for a 99-yard TD.
    
    	Scott
9.2585FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 24 1994 16:383
    Same thing happened in the Redskin-Dallas game a couple weeks ago.  One
    of the Skins ran it back 50+ yards to midfield.  Nobody on Dallas
    downed it.
9.2586I love itANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersMon Oct 24 1994 18:105
    I heard last night that it's the third time it's happened this year. 
    Seems so simple, how can professional players not know the rule?
    
    
    Spud
9.2587EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 24 1994 18:5114
    
>    I heard last night that it's the third time it's happened this year. 
>    Seems so simple, how can professional players not know the rule?
    
    That's the worst part.  Then a couple times a year you also see guys 
    running away from live, hard-to-handle kickoffs as if they were punts, 
    as well not knowing what to do with blocked kicks as in the Leon Lett 
    fiasco last year.  These are fairly fundamental things, but it goes 
    to show that given the nature of the game of football with its specific 
    individual assignments, players may know that playbook inside and out
    but many don't know even the basic rules...
    
    glenn
       
9.258857042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Oct 24 1994 19:254
maybe it has to do with all thos concussions going around.

The Crazy Met

9.2589FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Oct 24 1994 19:261
    ...or not all coaches stress fundamentals.
9.2590CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeTue Oct 25 1994 11:582
Hey, leave those return men alone.  They might not know the rules, but they
sure can strut and dance and celebrate......
9.2591HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Oct 25 1994 12:515
  It appears that the return men are the ones who know the rules but the guys
on special teams who's job is to stop them are a bit fuzzy on when the ball is
down. 

  George
9.2592they should be taught that in college25022::BREENTue Oct 25 1994 12:596
    Why not a 3 credit course in the rules of sport(s) to replace some of
    those other guts.
    
    Of course the "gut" quotient of any course depends on the grader.
    
    bte
9.2593Anyone got a score from Monday Night Football25022::BREENTue Oct 25 1994 13:021
    
9.2594Eagles, by a large handful24661::EHSTue Oct 25 1994 13:126
    
    I believe the Eagles won 21 to 6
    
    	Poor Jack P. for the Oilers, I believe he is outa-there!
    
                        Ed
9.259521-6HBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsTue Oct 25 1994 13:179
Philly 21, Houston 6

Garner ran one in. Cunningham passed to Barnett and Joseph. 2 Houston
TDs.

Coulda been worse. Philly was stopped once at the 1 and Cunningham threw
a_interception in the end zone.

TTom
9.2596SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Oct 25 1994 13:268
|Coulda been worse. Philly was stopped once at the 1 and Cunningham threw
|a_interception in the end zone.

Yabbut when the score was 14-6 Houston funbled on successive
plays on the Philly 5 yard line.  They lost it the second 
time.

=Bob=
9.2597HANNAH::ASHEAll I wanna do, is chew some gumTue Oct 25 1994 13:275
    2 Houston FG's...
    
    How many white returners are there?  Tasker doesn't do it anymore.
    Is that why there's so many celebrations? (smiley goes here)
    
9.2598CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeTue Oct 25 1994 13:309
George, you're sorta right.

When I wrote the note I was actually thinking of some of the instance
on kickoffs, where the return man forgets the ball is live and the kicking
team gets the TD.  That's kind of the "companion" situation to the
punt returns we'd been talking about.....


'Saw
9.2600dittoHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsTue Oct 25 1994 13:4517
That steal by Dishman was a real factor in the game.

It looked like Houston came into the game with a plan to tackle the ball.
On the play Tommy mentioned, it was successful. Later on the score by
Barnett, Dishman again went for the ball, missed and Fred was in.

BTW, one of the thing Philly has going for it is Fred Barnett. His return
to form has really helped. Also, the Eagles running game is coming into
its own. Charlie Garner is going to get some votes for ROY. Herschel
Walker is doing everything and anything Kotite is asking him, including
some excellent blocking. James Joseph gives Cunningham another option
outta the backfield.

Bob Hunt has to be smiling this morning. His Cavs drub the Heels and the
Eagles won at the Vet.

TTom
9.2601Cunningham still has a great arm!SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Oct 25 1994 13:4912
| of danger. The receiving corps is solid although the o-line has
| a couple of rough spots. The defense and special teams are quite
 
Seems that o-line comment can be attributed to a lot of
NFL teams these days.  They looked to be similar to the 
Patriots, in that they totally missed some blocking 
coverages when the defense did something tricky.

Cunningham did look good, I think he has learned a lot
from his early years.

=Bob=
9.2602updatesHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsTue Oct 25 1994 15:4025
Some comings and goings:

Erik Williams, Cowboy lineman, wrecked his Mercedes Monday and could miss
the rest of the season. Williams tore ligaments in his thumb and knee,
broke a couple of ribs and had severe facial cuts. Williams was
travelling a_estimated 75 mph.

Norv Turner says that Gus Frerotte has earned another start so
multi-millionaire Heath Shuler takes another seat as the Redskins host
the Eagles.

Chicago has lost Chris Gedney for the season with a broken leg.

Art Shell is denying a_ESPN report that he made a racial slur to
Hostetler during their "discussion". Shell's anger was further fueled
when ESPN aired it withoug even checking with him.

The Colts have a mini-controversy. Jim Harbaugh was benched for Don
Majkowski in the loss to the 'Skins. Marchibroda says he'll decide by
tomorrow who'll play.

David Klingler is out for the week. Backup Don Holas will miss the nexted
2 weeks. [somedangfirstedname] Blake will make the start.

TTom
9.2603puts teams with liek records in perspectiveMKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Tue Oct 25 1994 16:1820
    
    
    
    Not that it really means anything , but it is kinda interesting....
    
    NFL Power Rating    Week    8
    
              Team Opp.
         Team Wins Wins Pts. Opponents Defeated
       1 SF      6   18   30 Rai  Ram  NO   Det  Atl  TB
       2 Dal     6   17   29 Pit  Hou  Was  Ari  Phi  Ari
       3 SD      6   16   28 Den  Cin  Sea  Rai  KC   NO
       4 Min     5   18   28 Det  Chi  Mia  NYG  GB
       5 KC      5   18   28 NO   SF   Atl  Den  Sea
       6 Phi     5   16   26 Chi  GB   SF   Was  Hou
       7 Pit     5   13   23 Cle  Ind  Hou  Cin  NYG
       8 Mia     5   13   23 GB   NE   NYJ  Cin  Rai
       9 Cle     6   10   22 Cin  Ari  Ind  NYJ  Hou  Cin
      10 Chi     4   13   21 TB   NYJ  Buf  NO
    
9.2604Eagles and MajkowskiLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Tue Oct 25 1994 17:4318
      re: .2599
    
      Yup, you gotta like those Eagles.  They've lost Jerome Brown,
      Reggie White, Simmons, Joyner, Keith Jackson, Byars, and they
      are doing just fine thank you.   I don't know...I kind of think
      with that flux in players and how they are doing, Kotite should
      be strongly considered for coach of the year.
    
      re: Majkowski
    
      How did Majkowski do?  I always hoped the best for him when he
      left Green Bay.  I thought he was a hard luck guy.  I heard that
      his arm strength was marginally to begin with for an NFL QB and
      with his shoulder injury, he was basically through.  I still remember
      the injury.  I think it was Ken Harvey of the Cardinals.  He
      HAMMERED Majkowski.  I hope he does real well.
    
                                                   Tony
9.2605?Barry Sanders number?PROXY::OPPWed Oct 26 1994 00:495
    	Anyone know Barry Sanders of the Detroit Lions number?
    My eight-year-old son ask me this and I can't recall it.
    Thanks,
    
    Greg
9.260620WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Wed Oct 26 1994 11:051
    
9.2607HANNAH::ASHEAll I wanna do, is chew some gumWed Oct 26 1994 12:552
    Same as Billy Sims and Lem Barney...
    
9.2608ex-Heel goes goodHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsWed Oct 26 1994 13:053
And my main main, Natrone Means.

TTom
9.2609A proxy thank you.PROXY::OPPWed Oct 26 1994 13:162
      Thank you, all.
    
9.2610HANNAH::ASHEAll I wanna do, is chew some gumWed Oct 26 1994 13:184
    >                   <<< Note 9.2609 by PROXY::OPP >>>
    
    Wow, how appropriate is that address after last night?
    
9.2611Da good old OPPSCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Oct 26 1994 13:235
|    >                   <<< Note 9.2609 by PROXY::OPP >>>
    
|    Wow, how appropriate is that address after last night?
 
Yea, some of us are working by proxy today.   
9.2612'never happened'HBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsWed Oct 26 1994 13:4418
The controversy concerning Art Shell's alleged use of a racial slur in
his argument with Jeff Hostetler has now been denied by both of the
parties involved.

ESPN's Chris Mortensen reported that he talked to "sources" that said
that Shell refered to Hostetler as another white qb like Jay Schroeder.
Supposely a great number of expletives were included.

Shell immediately denied and challenged ESPN to come forward with the
"sources". They declined.

Now Hostetler is saying it aint true. Hoss call a press conference to eny
that Shell made the racial remark to him and said that he had never heard
Shell speak that way.

ESPN is sticking with it's version and refusing to cite their "sources".

TTom
9.2613Immortal Detroit Lion question25022::BREENGet these mutts away from meWed Oct 26 1994 14:2913
    What was Doak Walker's number?  I assume his number was retired.  This
    should be an easy question for any true Detroit Lion fan since for
    example any Boston fan knows Teddy Ballgame was number 9.
    
    Frank Way could give you Gifford's number and Huff's.
    
    All Cleveland fans know Lou "the Toe" Groza's number better than their
    own phone number.
    
    And of course Jake could tell you Bobby Layne's number but we'll wait
    till tomorrow for that one.  Ernie Stautner can be substituted.
    
    billte
9.2614moreHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsWed Oct 26 1994 14:3513
more tidbits:

Tim Worley was placed on the reserve non-injury list. Worley missed a
team meeting and the plane to the lasted game. In a_interview, Coach
Wannstedt made it clear that there was more to this than missing a couple
of events. Worley sat out a couple of years ago after testing positive.

It's Jeff Blake who'll start for Cincy. Jeff played at East Carolina.

Craig Erickson will start for TB. Multimillionaire rookie Trent Dilfer
rides the pine.

TTOm
9.2615CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeWed Oct 26 1994 14:5315
>    
>    Frank Way could give you Gifford's number and Huff's.
>    

Both numbers, btw, are NOT retired by the Giants...

Gifford was #16, and Sam Huff was #70....


The league has approached the Packers and the Giants in the past
and asked them not to retire too many more numbers.   I'm not sure
if that's the case with Detroit and Chicago also.....


'Saw
9.2616Other teams practice sacrilegious paganism...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 26 1994 15:0420
> The league has approached the Packers and the Giants in the past
> and asked them not to retire too many more numbers.   I'm not sure
> if that's the case with Detroit and Chicago also.....
    
    As far as I know Chicago has retired _no_ numbers, until this week,
    that is.  I think it's at this week's game that they're finally going
    to give Sayers' 40 and Butkus' 51 the honors (I'd guess that Payton's
    will follow at some point).  Now why they've let mere mortals run 
    around on the field with these numbers all these years is anybody's 
    guess.
    
    As I understand it the Steelers do not offically retire numbers,
    either.  I think they've held some of them back from use (12, 58, 59,
    75) but others have re-circulated (82, 88).  Who was it that refused to
    wear Harris' 32 which was finally offered up?  It was Bam Morris just 
    this year, right?  
    
    glenn
    
9.2617othersHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsWed Oct 26 1994 15:1113
Glenn,

I think that Chicago has a bunch of other numbers retired. ESPN had a
chart with the pro teams with the most retired numbers and Chicago had
more retired than any one else in the NFL.

Sorry, but I don't know who they are, except, as you mentioned, for
Sayers and Butkus. For 51, Chicago had been playing/using it but stopped.

FWIW, Boston Celtics had more retired numbers than any other pro
franchise.

TTom
9.2619ANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersWed Oct 26 1994 17:1610
    If I can round up this morning's Chicago Sun-Times, I'll list all the
    previous Bears jersey's retired.  There had to be about ten that have
    been done already.  I'll have to double-check, but I thought it also
    mentioned that Chicago has had the most retired overall.
    
    Ditka hasn't yet.  The sportsnut next to me was just saying yesterday
    that he wished they would retire his as well.
    
    
    Spud
9.2620updateANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersWed Oct 26 1994 17:185
    It was in yesterday's paper.  TSN (the sports nut) was telling me
    they've retired 13 Bear jerseys and it is the most in the NFL.
    
    
    Spud
9.2622HANNAH::ASHEAll I wanna do, is chew some gumWed Oct 26 1994 17:321
    Payton... 
9.2623Spudster, can you get the answer?SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Oct 26 1994 17:3323
    
|        OK, so Ditka, Butkus and Sayers haven't had their numbers retired.
|       Anyone care to hazard a guess on who has?

That's a tough one.  Truely a guess:

1.   Bronko Nagurski (sp?)
2.   Red Grange
3.   Sid Luckman
4.   Bill George
5.   George Halas (yes, he played)
6.   Abe Gibron (sp?)
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.  Doug Flutie (that one's for JD)

That's all I can think of.

=Bob=
9.2624FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Oct 26 1994 17:341
    Brian Piccolo
9.2625Williams drunk, Majik Man startsHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsWed Oct 26 1994 17:548
and some more...

Erik Williams was indeed under the influence prior to his wreck.

And the Colts are gonna start the Majik Man, sitting Harbaugh on the
pine.

TTom
9.2626CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeWed Oct 26 1994 18:151
Giant have retired ten.
9.2627no #'s leftGENRAL::WADEFearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGunsWed Oct 26 1994 18:175
    
    	I think retiring jersies is silly.  Cut to the year 2050.  You'll
    	have a bunch of guys running around with jersey 1A, 1B, 1C, etc...
    
    Claybone
9.2628CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeWed Oct 26 1994 18:227
I think it's cool if done appropriately....  I can see the Red Sox
retiring Ted Williams number, because who else could wear #9?

Course with the Sox you have to be in the HoF to have your number retired...


'saw
9.2629ROCK::HUBERIndians in '94Wed Oct 26 1994 18:289
    
>    	I think retiring jersies is silly.  Cut to the year 2050.  You'll
>    	have a bunch of guys running around with jersey 1A, 1B, 1C, etc...
    
    The NFL agrees with you; the Browns would love to retire Ozzie
    Newsome's number, and probably Clay Matthew's as well, but the NFL
    is strongly discouraging the retirement of any numbers.
    
    Joe
9.263033,2,1 next?HBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsWed Oct 26 1994 18:313
I guess the Hornets will join the Celtics in retiring 00.

TTom
9.263113 totalANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersWed Oct 26 1994 18:4324
    Okay.  Here they are:
    
    Bronko Nagurski  3
    George MacAfee   5
    George Halas     7
           Gilmore  28
    Walter Payton   34
    Brian Piccolo   41
    Sid Luckman     42
    Bill Ewitt      56
    Bill George     61
    Bill Turner     66
    Red Grange      77
    
    and Monday night:
    
    Gayle Sayers    40
    Dick Butkess    51
    
    
    HTH,
    
    
    Spud
9.2632oopsANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersWed Oct 26 1994 18:444
    That should be "Bulldog" Turner.
    
    
    Spud
9.2634big todo about what?25022::BREENGet these mutts away from meWed Oct 26 1994 18:556
    well a lot of those guys were from the monsters of the midway but I
    only count two championships in 40 years.
    
    And if you do Hampton don't you have to do Dent?
    
    I will agree that Jim McMahon number can be reused indefinitely.
9.2636Hampton does deserve it25022::BREENGet these mutts away from meWed Oct 26 1994 19:374
    Well it seemed like they were to together for the "glory" years.
    
    but considering the condition of Hampton's knees and body I'd go with
    the retirement to reward his sacrifice.
9.2637Da Bears (got carried away)EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 26 1994 19:3820
                        
    I think that uniform number retirement should be reserved for those
    covered by the loosely-defined term "immortal".  That would include
    Butkus, but not someone like Hampton.  Now that I've seen the way the
    Bears have thrown around the retired numbers, I now recall something
    about Butkus being held off due to some kind of a long-running feud
    with Halas and the Bears, which is a pretty stupid reason on the 
    Bears' part (they needn't have even held a ceremony to reserve the 
    number, if the dispute was that important).  With all due respect, 
    someone got a bit carried away after the Brian Piccolo tragedy.  They 
    could probably could have cut that list in half by leaving it at 
    Nagurski, Luckman, Butkus, Payton, and maybe Sayers, Bill George and 
    Bulldog Turner (I'll defer to Billte on those last two ;-).  Red 
    Grange didn't even play that long in the NFL-- that must have been a 
    concession to the Illini contingent.  Willie Galimore?  I don't think 
    so.  Retire an old houndstooth cap-- not The Bear's, though-- or 
    something like that for Halas.
    
    glenn
    
9.2638I'd have eightSCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Oct 26 1994 20:0520
If I were choosing from that list:

    
    Bronko Nagurski  Yup
    George MacAfee   Nope
    George Halas     Yup
    Willie Gilamore  Nope (but he IS in the HOF, I think)
    Walter Payton    Yup
    Brian Piccolo    Nope
    Sid Luckman      Yup
    Bill Ewitt       Nope
    Bill George      Nope
    Clyde Turner     Yup
    Red Grange       Yup (contribution to the game)
    
    and Monday night:
    
    Gayle Sayers     Yup
    Dick Butkess     Yup
  
9.2639When men were men25022::BREENGet these mutts away from meWed Oct 26 1994 20:0615
    Bulldog is before my time.  Bill George was one of three nfc-west
    middle linebackers who had their adherents as nfl best (most serious
    observers didn't rank Huff at the top, skill wise).
    
    I'm trying to recall the Defensive End on that squad who I believe just
    made hof.  The Bears defense from 55-70 was considered nfl's best.
    
    One thing that Bears lacked was a quarterback and the best of the lot
    during the 60s was probably BC's Jack Concannon who had injury
    problems.
    
    Grange was to the nfl as Joe Willie Namath was to AFL; the guy who gave
    it credibility.  In those days the top college teams were considered
    superior to the pro teams, an opinion that Army's Red Blaik held right
    up to 1960.
9.2640HANNAH::ASHEAll I wanna do, is chew some gumWed Oct 26 1994 20:182
    I could see Piccolo... that was a very emotional time for them...
    
9.2641Got the same problem, billte...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 26 1994 20:369
                                
>    I'm trying to recall the Defensive End on that squad who I believe just
>    made hof.  The Bears defense from 55-70 was considered nfl's best.
    
    I think this is the guy who very recently was defensive line 
    coach for the Patriots... now what the hell was his name?
    
    glenn
    
9.2642Giants retired numbersCAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeThu Oct 27 1994 12:0226
The Giants have retired the following numbers:


 1 - Ray Flaherty
 7 - Mel Hein
14 - YA Tittle
32 - Al Blozis (killed in WWII) 
40 - Joe Morrison
42 - Charlie Conerly
50 - Ken Strong
56 - Lawrence Taylor



11 will be retired soon.

Al Blozis got retired after playing two seasons.  They said he was one of
the greatest linemen they'd ever seen.  He was huge (like 6'6") and had
a problem getting into the service, but finally got into the Army.

He went out one day to find a missing patrol and never came back.  


There was another Giant player (forget what his name was) who was killed
in Okinawa.  I don't know all the details but he was awarded the Congressional
Medal of Honor for his actions.
9.2643SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Thu Oct 27 1994 12:199
|14 - YA Tittle

This probably a question for Billte, since I know 
'Saw is my age, so doesn't really remember:

How many years did Tittle play in NY, and how many in 
SF?  Where did he have his best years?

=Bob=
9.2644CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeThu Oct 27 1994 12:2114
>This probably a question for Billte, since I know 
>'Saw is my age, so doesn't really remember:
>
>How many years did Tittle play in NY, and how many in 
>SF?  Where did he have his best years?

Actually, that subject was broached on WFAN at one point.

I don't have my football encyclopedia here, but I know that YA had
a couple of good years in NY, and I know he took them to the championship
game at least once.


'Saw
9.264625151::BREENThu Oct 27 1994 14:1211
Tittle came to the Giants late in his career and I'd bet in his mid 30s. 
I believe he played in both the Green Bay title games but was ineffective 
in both; Connerly relieved him in the second one.  He was outstanding during the
regular season and I'd guess his years were 60-65.

He was part of a three quarterback experiment with 49ers and never was recognized 
there as a great quarterback though I'm sure he had the skills but not the team
that the Giants had.  John Brodie made him expendable.

Myself, I was always a Connerly man, just as I was a Grogan man with Pat's and 
never saw the need for Eason.
9.2647EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 27 1994 14:3513
>>    I'm trying to recall the Defensive End on that squad who I believe just
>>    made hof.  The Bears defense from 55-70 was considered nfl's best.
>    
>    I think this is the guy who very recently was defensive line 
>    coach for the Patriots... now what the hell was his name?
    
    Okay, the guy I was thinking of is Stan Jones, but maybe the guy you
    were thinking of is Doug Atkins.  Both were HOF DEs for the Bears in
    that time period.  Atkins was the better player of the two, certainly...
    
    glenn
    
9.2648WB RatingsHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsThu Oct 27 1994 14:3544
The following are the USA Today/Gordon Forbes ratings for NFL QBs.

The ranges are
	90-100	franchise
	80-89	solid, productive starters
	70-79	starters lacking consistency or experience
	60-69	need work

Rank			Rating
 1. Troy Aikman		98.0
 2. Steve Young		96.0
 3. Dan Marino		95.0
 4. John Elway		92.5
 5. Joe Montana		91.0
 6. Drew Bledsoe	90.0
 7. Jim E.Kelly		89.0
 8. Randall Cunningham	87.0
 9. Warren Moon		86.5
10. Jeff George		86.0
11. Stan Humphries	85.5
12. Rick Mirer		84.0
13. Jeff Hostetler	83.5
14. Erik Kramer		83.0
15. Brett Favre		82.0
16. Jim Everett		81.5
17. Boomer Esiason	81.0
18. Neil O'Donnell	80.5
19. Craig Erickson	80.0
20. Scott Mitchell	78.0
21. Jim Harbaugh	77.0
22. Chris Miller	74.0
23. John Friesz		71.5
24. Vinny Testaverde	71.0
25. Cody Carlson	70.5
26. Steve Walsh		68.0
27. Dave Brown		66.5
28. Steve Beuerlein	65.0
29. David Klingler	64.0
30. Heath Shuler	62.0
31. Bucky Richardson	61.5

The rest are unrated.

TTom
9.2649yep, Doug Atkins, a brute of a man25151::BREENThu Oct 27 1994 14:390
9.2650WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Thu Oct 27 1994 14:436
    
    
       Aikman #1??? Give me freakin break. Emmitt carries that man!!!!
    
    
    Chap
9.2651where's that Chap's roster?HBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsThu Oct 27 1994 14:489
Let's see, now...

The Chap's have #5 Montana and #7 Kelly.

The Doovers have #2 Young and #3 Marino.

I can see why you're crying ;-).

TTom
9.2652WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Thu Oct 27 1994 14:526
    
    
       2 words for ya Ttom..
    
    
    Steve                                         Christie
9.26536-2 vs 4-4HBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsThu Oct 27 1994 14:530
9.2654Lucky vs UnluckyAllen's 2 pt conversion crushed meWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Thu Oct 27 1994 15:041
    
9.2655it had to be saidCNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthThu Oct 27 1994 15:345
 all you got to do is look at ole Inties Elway at #4 to know this rating 
 system is significantly FLAWED!!!!!!!!

 mike
9.2656CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeThu Oct 27 1994 15:361
Doug Atkins was a STUD.
9.2657go broncosBSS::MARLANDThu Oct 27 1994 15:492
    all you people like to knock Elway but every team in the league
    sure is afraid of him.
9.2658That QB rating was a JOKEMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Oct 27 1994 15:5514
    Saying Cunningham and Moon are not FRANCHISE QB's is a joke...
    
    Look at Houston without him, and look at minny with him, what else
    is needed to prove that one.
    
    Same with Cunningham, how does his team fare without him compared to
    when he's in there.
    
    Funny in the NFC which is the superior league Moon and Cunningham are
    leading the #3 and #4 teams in the NFC... Without these 2 QB's neither
    of those teams are legitimate contenders (I still feel both of those
    teams are capable of upsetting Dallas or San Fran, more so at home).
    
    									mab
9.2659maybe years ago but not any moreCNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthThu Oct 27 1994 15:5911
>    all you people like to knock Elway but every team in the league
>    sure is afraid of him.


    why?

 He's got more weapons than maybe 2 or 3 other QB's in the league and what
 has done with them? Won a whole 2 games. WHOOPIE!!!!!!!!

  mike
9.2661MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Thu Oct 27 1994 16:049
    >Look at Houston without him, and look at minny with him, what else
    >is needed to prove that one.
    
    
    Who let Dr 00:00 into mab's account?    
    
    
    
    billl
9.2662WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Thu Oct 27 1994 16:506
    
    
         Raiders Aren't afraid of BuckY  :-)
    
    
    Chap
9.2663lost a bitHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsThu Oct 27 1994 16:575
I, for one, feel that Elway has lost a little this year.

It may be a bad offensive line but he really hasn't looked all that good.

TTom
9.2664CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeThu Oct 27 1994 17:203
Moon and Cunningham could be franchise QBs under some definitions, but
I can tell you one thing -- when it comes to the playoffs, watch
them gag on the ol' Chicken Bone!
9.2665Moon/Cunningham are as good or better then ALL of these QB'sMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Oct 27 1994 17:254
    That can be said for Young, ALL/ANY NFC Central QB's, Elway, Kelly,
    Marino etc, etc, etc...
    
    								MaB
9.2667CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeThu Oct 27 1994 18:2823
>       Yeah. It's Warren's fault that the Oilers took a 30+ 
>       point lead into halftime against the Bills and managed
>       to lose. Or was that Reeves' fault I'm not sure. And
>       exactly which game did Randall choke during? The fog 
>       game?

Hey, facks is facks.

Worn Moon has never lead an NFL team anywhere but home early.
And Randall is the same way.  

If you don't believe me, listen to all the analysts who talk about
Randall and Worn not being able to win the big one.


If I remember right, Reeves was still in Denver when Worn's 'mates
blew that game (was it two years ago or three, I can't remember, but I'm
thinking three) in which case we had Ray Handley.

If it was Ray Handley, you can be damn sure it was his fault -- EVERYTHING
was his fault 8^)


9.2669Kelly was outHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsThu Oct 27 1994 18:526
Concerning the Buffalo-Houston playoff game, one point not being made is
that Buffalo came back with Kelly outta the game.

Hail, if'n Kelly plays the Oilers may have won the game.

TTom
9.2670MKFSA::LONGStrive for five!Thu Oct 27 1994 18:568
    I get Tommy's point about Worn (I like that) not being responible for 
    the D's short comings in the second half.  However, you also have to 
    wonder about a team who can put 30+ points on the board in the first 
    half then zip in the second.  Especially when the other team starts 
    closing the gap.
    
    
    billl
9.2671Just passing through, causing some trouble...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 27 1994 19:2610
>        I'd like to hear some specifics on exactly when Randall "choked"
>        in a playoff game. He wasn't that polished a qb until the last
>        three years or so but "choked"?
    
    Maybe this is sort of like how Yaz always used to "choke"... ;-)
    
    
    glenn
    
9.2673EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 27 1994 19:428
    
>      You mean with a weak pop up to end the series?
    
    Yup, kinda like that brutal INT Moon tossed up at the end of the
    Buffalo game...
    
    glenn
    
9.2675Now that you've come full circle on the matter of putting up 35...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 27 1994 20:0818
    
>        Meanwhile yesterday's Globe contained a quote by coach Bill 
>        about how badly turnovers particularly those caused by the in-
>        experience at quarterback have hurt the team. Apparently, Bill 
>        has reversed position on his 'complete qb' stance. Ha!
    
    Don't obfuscate, Tommy.  Seems to me that a very few mistakes made 
    by a certain QB set you off pretty good after a couple games where 
    "you score 35 points you ought to win" wasn't cutting any mustard 
    at all with you...  Not that there's anything particularly funny 
    about it, seeing that no one expected there would be no rough spots
    along the way (there's hardly a contradiction).  I suspect that
    Parcells knows full well the downside to having absolutely no 
    running game, but as a coach it's still his job to seek perfection 
    from everyone, every week, regardless.
    
    glenn
     
9.2676I'll split the difference on this one...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Oct 27 1994 20:1910
    
    BTW, I don't think Warren Moon is a "choker".  On the contrary, he's 
    a damn good QB who could very well be the last-chance savior of the
    Minnesota regime.  Cunningham, on the other hand, has more to prove.
    For all his talents, I think he has had struggles in the playoffs where
    he did have control over the outcome of the game and didn't get it
    done.
    
    glenn
    
9.2677TORREY::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesThu Oct 27 1994 23:587
>                 <<< Note 9.2657 by BSS::MARLAND >>>                               
>                          -< go broncos >-    
    
>    all you people like to knock Elway but every team in the league    
>    sure is afraid of him.
    
    You mean afraid to let him play on their team, right?
9.2678#'s dont lie, there Individual contrabutions are HUGEMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 28 1994 12:0112
    SO Moon and Cunningham are both chokers becuase they couldnt lead
    there teams thru the BIG GAMES.
    
    So by just using that criteria every starting QB in the league today
    is a choker except who... Hoss, Montana and Aikman.  I think Im missing
    one more but arnt these the only 3 starting QB's in the league that
    were able to lead there team thru the BIG GAMES.  SO the rest are
    all chockers...
    
    Ya Id take Hoss and Montana over Moon, Randall, Elway etc... 
    
    								MaB
9.2679CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeFri Oct 28 1994 12:0220
I never said that Worn was TOO BLAM for the Buffalo loss.

First off, Worn wasn't playing both ways.  But neither was he helping the
cause by putting more points on the board.

Secondly, Buffalo is but one game, and I'm not talking about just one game.
Worn was in Houston for a long time, and never brought them to the promised
land.


Crandall Runningham on the other hand, as Glenn says, has a lot to prove.
He's always been a little too quick to run, never really totally "fitted"
into the system, and, on the whole, doesn't have what it takes IMO to
lead the Eagles anywhere....

To me, Crandall is kind of like Farve, but at a higher level -- lots o'
press, but damn little results....


'Saw
9.2680CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeFri Oct 28 1994 12:1243
>           -< #'s dont lie, there Individual contrabutions are HUGE >-

What would you rather have on the Pats, Mab?  Someone who has HUGE
individual numbers, or someone who can win you a championship?

How would you have liked it if Mikey "I Still Think I Can Play Baseball"
Jordan had HUGE individual stats, but no champeenship rings?




>
>    SO Moon and Cunningham are both chokers becuase they couldnt lead
>    there teams thru the BIG GAMES.
>    

No, I didn't say that.  Read my lips.

Moon and Cunningham have not lead their teams to the promised land.
According to most analysts, they're still lacking something.

Moon has choked in some important games over the years, and Randall
seems to disappear in the playoffs.   That's a fact, go back and
review the tapes.


>    So by just using that criteria every starting QB in the league today
>    is a choker except who... Hoss, Montana and Aikman.  I think Im missing
>    one more but arnt these the only 3 starting QB's in the league that
>    were able to lead there team thru the BIG GAMES.  SO the rest are
>    all chockers...
>    

And you write software?  Man, with logic like that it's a wonder anything
you write works......8^)


Oh yeah, what's a chocker?  Is that the guy who puts the chock under the
wheel of the airliner?  8^)


'Saw

9.2681Vikes should win 5 of their next 6 gamesANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersFri Oct 28 1994 12:359
    Hey 'Saw!
    
    One thing to consider, tho, is that Moon never had the defense in
    Houston he now has in Minnesota.  I really feel he was the missing
    piece in the Vikings plan.  We'll see, but I like our chances to go a
    long way this year.
    
    
    Spud
9.2682Moon and Randall are 2 of the top 5 in the game todayMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 28 1994 12:5532
    Well CAM you cant compare Basketball to Football, the same 5 guys have
    to play offense and defense so they control there own fate regardless.
    Also no special teams :-)
    
    What Im trying to point out is that Moon and Randall are both great
    QB's.  THATS QB's there not great coaches, Running Backs, WR's, Def
    or Kickers.  Steve Young would be in the same catagory as the previous
    2 QB's (Moon/Randall) but SF had the team that could go to and win the
    superbowl and changed young for Montana and couldnt get the job done.
    
    So give Moon/Randall SF's Defense, Rice, Watters, Jones etc and see if
    they could get to the BIG DANCE....  What stopped Houston and Philly
    from getting to the Superbowl was not there QB's, they didnt have the
    rest of what was needed.  In SF on the other hand, they WENT to and ONE
    the SB then improved the team but went with Young Over Montana....and
    havnt gone anywhere since...
    
    Plus look at Houston/Philly without Moon/Randall the team goes down
    think back to what SF was with Montana over Young...
    
    Young has had all the pieces and still couldnt get the job done, Moon
    and Randall have come just as close without the comparable teams around
    them....
    
    Will be intresting to see the playoffs in the NFC, Aikman, Moon,
    Randall and Young should all be there, obviosly SF and DALLAS have
    the better all around teams but I think Moon or Randall will help
    drive there team past one of SF or DALLAS... Hopefully both.
    
    I dont Philly's D can win it for them but Minny's D could...
    
    								mab
9.2685ELMAGO::BENBACAAtDEC18Years.ItAllEndsNovember18th.Fri Oct 28 1994 16:271
     What defense?
9.2686CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeFri Oct 28 1994 16:4832
|
| >> Moon and Cunningham have not lead their teams to the promised land.
| >> According to most analysts, they're still lacking something.
|
| >> Moon has choked in some important games over the years, and Randall
| >> seems to disappear in the playoffs.   That's a fact, go back and
| >> review the tapes.
|    
|    I love these vague assertions that aren't backed up by any factual
|    data whatsoever. "According to most analysts". What analysts? Names
|    please. "Lacking something"? Couldn't be more vague. "Moon has 
|    choked in some important games" and "Randall seems to disappear in
|    the playoffs". Which games? 


Do me.

Watch ESPN, watch Fox.  Listen to the radio shows.  Watch TNT, 

I don't have to back up anything with times and dates and references.  I'm
not writing a research paper or a newspaper article here.  I'm stating
opinions, based on what I've heard by watching football over the past
few years.

If you need answers to your questions, and it doesn't really matter what
I say because you're just being contrary as usual,  you can read
Randall's playoff games as "all of them" and Worn's important games as
"anyone which would advance Houston in the playoffs".


Next time clue me in if you want references and I'll start watching
the games with a pad, a pencil and a chronometer.....
9.2688SF/DAL/PHI/MIN should not lose this weekend :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 28 1994 18:3522
    **********************
    I don't have to back up anything with times and dates and references. 
    I'm
    not writing a research paper or a newspaper article here.  I'm stating
    opinions, based on what I've heard by watching football over the past
    few years.
    ***********
    
    Oh ya Saw you can type anything and dont need proof to back it up but
    you want me to submit all my notes LOOKING like  research papers or
    newspaper articles... :-)
    
    Any QB that does not LEAD his team to a SUPERBOWL WIN will always be
    questioned regardless of his stats or accomplishments.  Also MOST OR
    ALL NFL FOOTBALL fans will never recognize any accomplishments in
    the Pop-Warner Level of CFL, USFL or WORLD LEAGUE....
    
    These are the FACTS and if Michael Jordan never won a championship
    people would have always question his talant, and weather he was a 
    team player or just padding his stats night in and night out...
    
    								mab
9.2689I'm just going on what I'm told...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Oct 28 1994 18:4644
                                              
   >> Don't obfuscate, Tommy. 
   >
   >   Please. Are you going to tell me that you threw Carl Yazstremski
   >   into the discussion in order to clarify things?
    
    Actually, yes.  It was at least related to the topic at hand, "winning 
    da big one" (as opposed to the merits of a second-year QB), and was as 
    much for 'Saw's benefit as yours, because I know 'Saw's position on 
    Yaz, and it ain't the totally irrelevant "which would you rather have, 
    stats or a championship" (because that choice is never available) or 
    "never led them to the promised land", nothing like that.  But as for 
    Moon, yes, he has made come crucial mistakes in big games, including 
    a whopper at the end of the Buffalo game.  And he was even a veteran
    at the time.  No huge deal, as I agree that he's not a "choker", but 
    it's still a fact.
    
> It was even pointed out that we had a winning record! Of course we were a
> whopping 3-2 (ticker tape parade!)
    
    But it should have been 5-0 (now 5-2), mostly on Bledsoe's arm.  
    I'm going by an authority even higher than Parcells', that of 
    Tommy Brydie.  "You score 35 points, you should win.  And if you 
    don't it ain't the quarterback's fault."-- Tommy Brydie.  It 
    don't get much more authoritative than that.
    
>      Nice try but no cigar. Drew's turnovers have been very costly and the 
>      coach flat out said so. The lack of a running game can't be blamed
>      for everything especially the inabality to handle the snap from center,
>      throwing the ball into traffic and the inability to recognize the
>      blitz.
 
    I agree with the first one; the last two are related to the lack of a
    running game.  But it could just as easily be said (by Parcells, by 
    anyone) that Drew's touchdowns have been very valuable, because there 
    hasn't been any other offense than the passing game.  All depends on 
    your expectations.  Like I said, for a coach it's healthy to strive for
    perfection.  As a supposed Pats' fan I seriously wonder about your 
    negativity around Bledsoe, though.  It's one thing to point out
    mistakes but you seem to take great glee in them, especially when to
    date they've been outnumbered by the positives...
    
    glenn
    
9.2690and that from now on you'll spell it talent--thanksCNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthFri Oct 28 1994 18:558
 Mab, please help me out here. I'm the last one to point out spelling errors,
 grammar, fat finger typing etc but you continually use the word the talent
 and spell it as talant. Please tell me you really know that talent is
 spelled talent and not talant and that you're just trying to bust the
 spelling and grammar police's balls...........

 mike
9.2692Back to the original; I still don't understand the fuss...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Oct 28 1994 19:2819
>     Drew Bledose in his second year, playing for a losing team is 
>     a franchise QB and Jim Kelly, Warren Moon and Randall Cunningham
>     aren't. These QB ratings and Jeff Sagarin's power ratings are 
>     all the proof you need that you can use stats to backup any argu-
>     ment that you choose.
    
    By the way, getting back to the comment that started this, what's so
    outrageous about this comparison (especially when you consider the four
    QBs are separated by a grand total of 3.5 "points", whatever those
    are)?  I question the use of the word "franchise" in a single-season
    rating system, but ranking system aside is there any doubt but that 
    Drew Bledsoe is almost the definition of a "franchise QB" and that each
    of the teams employing the other QBs above wouldn't hesitate one minute
    in swapping each straight up for Bledsoe, showing what he already has
    at 22 years of age?
    
    glenn
       
9.2693Drew is da manMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 28 1994 19:3829
    -1..
    
    Id have a hard time beleiving that 90% of the teams in the league
    would trade straight up for bledsoe with there starting QB ?
    
    The only teams that may not consider it (THIS YEAR) would be the
    one's that feel thay have a legit shot at winning the SB this year.
    (DAL, Philly, Minny, SF, KC, MIA, BUF, SD).
    
    But a few of those teams (Minny, KC, MIA, BUF, SD) Would be stupid
    not too.  Aikman is still young, randall has a few good years but the
    other teams all have old QB's (minny, KC, mia, buf) or avg qb's (SD)
    or just CHOKE ARTIST (SF).
    
    Bledsoe is the BEST YOUNG QB in the game today and at this point or
    the season and his career looks to be the best QB in the game.  Id say
    every team in the league would benefit by having drew bledsoe on there
    team over the next 2-5 seasons (He would need a year to grow into any
    teams systems).
    
    Bledsoe leads the league in attempts, completions, yards, and is 2nd in
    TD's to Marino.  This is not 1 game but go back to the later half of
    last season and the 1st half of this season and he may just be the top
    QB in the game.  Yes he still makes alot of 22 year old 2nd year qb 
    mistakes (INT's etc) but thats youth and inexperience...
    
    over 2300 yrds and 14tds in 7 games (Avg of 310yrds and 2 tds per game)
    not too shabbby......
    								mab
9.2694a team to wreckon with ;*)ANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersFri Oct 28 1994 19:3921
    I think the Vikes have what they need to get it done this year.  In the
    recent past, they've had bukoo Pro Bowlers and died early in the
    playoffs.  Now they have a few name players and a solid team.  Moon is
    the type of QB they've been missing since two-minute Tommy Kramer. 
    When they've made the playoffs over the last ten years or so, they've
    upset a few people, but were never regarded as legitimate to reach the
    Overhyped Bowl.  This year I would think they have a solid shot at
    getting a first round bye and home field for one or two games through
    the NFC Championship.  Whether this happens and they get it done
    remains to be seen, but at least the attitude with us (Vikes fans) is
    that this isn't a 9 or 10 win barely-make-it-into-the-playoffs team.
    This team should win 11 and possibly 12 games and reach the next level.
    
    There's a whole new attitude in watching games that they're never out
    of it with Moon.  It's also nice to see them not sitting on leads and
    playing too conservatively.  They have more of the killer instinct.
    
    They'd better blow Tampa Bay away too... or else.  :*O
    
    
    Spud
9.2695Go Vikes.. But let Rhett have a big game :-)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 28 1994 19:4310
    11 or 12 wins are very reachable for minny, but there HFA may ride
    on the last game of the season.  San Fransisco, at Minny in week17.
    
    All minny has to do is win the games they should win
    (TB, NO, Pats, NYJ, TB) Then Maybe Split the game they can win
    (Chi, Det, Buf, SF) and they win 12 :-)
    
    Im hoping Minny or Philly can someone get the #1 seed in the NFC
    
    								mab
9.2697Not better than dozen other QBs + Moon/Cunn? Name 'em...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Oct 28 1994 20:4027
>     I doubt that that rating takes into account upside potential. At this
>     point in his career Drew is *not* a better QB than Randall or Warren
>     and anyone of a dozen QBs could have this team at 3-4. Plug Drew into
>     Philly or Minny and those teams probably aren't 5-2.
    
    I respectfully have to ask what this superhuman QB looks like 
    who is able to overcome no running game all season long, spotty
    wide receivers and two horrendous defensive efforts to have the 
    Patriots at 4-3 or better.  I'd also strongly disagree that 
    Bledsoe is only in the middle of the pack behind or even with 
    half the league's QBs, and say that it's far more credible that 
    there are a dozen or more starting QBs out there who'd have this 
    team and its problems at 2-5, or worse.
    
    As I said before, I'll grant you Moon's credentials, but over his
    career (if not through the first part of this season), Cunningham has
    far too often been the victim of exactly the kind of mistakes that you
    criticize Bledsoe for.  In the later years (before the injuries) he 
    didn't have inexperience as an excuse, either.  Maybe he has turned it 
    around this year, but the "guile and leadership" part has not been 
    previously evident, at least not consistently and definitely not in 
    the three playoff starts (three lackluster performances, three losses) 
    in his career.
    
    glenn
    
9.2698CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeMon Oct 31 1994 11:5317
I've watched a lot of football too, and football shows on ESPN (Schaap Talk,
stuff like that).

The subject of Randall's inability to win the big games has come up many times.
I can't give you exact dates and times or channels and on-air personalities,
but I know what I've heard.  If that's not good enough for you Tommy, I'm
sorry.  Randall's been in more playoff games than just the fog game...

I know one thing -- Randall Cunningham has ALWAYS been a Giant killer when
he's been healthy.


Mab, I don't object to what you say so much.  It's just that I like to
try and read your notes without a decoder ring.....


'Saw
9.2700Shut it down, get back to basics, if it fails or not...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 31 1994 13:5933
    
>    Its too bad that you can't point out that Drew has flaws without
>    having your credentials as a Patriots fan questioned. I've been
>    a Pats fan all my life. I've even become a Drew fan even though
>    he wasn't the guy I wanted them to draft. He's obviously a budding
>    superstar and his talent and attitude have won me over much as Marshall
>    Faulk is doing. 
    
    This is all very reasonable, and I don't disagree with it even
    slightly.  You got the (desired, I expect) reaction out of me with
    the stuff about wondering if Bledsoe has a ten-cent head, etc., which
    I still don't think is the case.  Currently, for a second-year QB,
    there could not be a more perfect recipe for failure than the situation
    that exists with the Pats' running game, where Bledsoe must throw 2 of
    every 3 downs.  I still think that Parcells should return some to what
    I believe he was up to in the Jets' game, where at least for a while he 
    was trying to run the ball more with Blair Thomas even if it wasn't
    very efficient and might have increased his chances of losing that 
    particular game.  Basically, any realistic playoff chances are over.  
    Take some of the pressure off, concentrate on the running game during 
    the week and insist on using it on the weekend, even if it takes a 
    few weeks to see progress.  There may even be an immediate upside in 
    that that'll keep Bledsoe from being killed (that wasn't a real 
    problem yesterday, though).  There _has_ to be a running game for 
    any longterm upside.
    
    Glad to hear you're finally coming around on Faulk, though.  That
    winning TD run of his yesterday was sheer beauty.  I look forward to
    seeing him against the Pats twice in the upcoming months...
    
    
    glenn
    
9.270230008::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaMon Oct 31 1994 15:054
    	I think Bledsoe is the perfect extension of his coach.  They're
    both bonehaids!
    
    				   /Don
9.2703No letdown, looking for HFA come playoff timeANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersMon Oct 31 1994 16:0112
    Gotta like the way the Vikes put Tampa Bay away early yesterday.  Much
    like the Bear game, they could've named their score from halftime on.
    
    All four RB's got some PT, with Allen coming back with another long run
    and 100+ yards.
    
    Vikes D continues to be an offensive weapon.  Anthony Parker picked
    another one off for a TD and has scored in three straight games now. 
    Anyone know the record for a defensive player?  
    
    
    Spud
9.2704Minnesota/Green BayLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Oct 31 1994 16:0215
      re: .2694
    
      I have to ask...what do you think of the Pack?  The Packer's 
      defense has held Minnesota's offense to 9 points in TWO games!!
      The loss at Minnesota was a real backbreaker.
    
      By the way, Moon executed a really nice drive at the end of
      regulation.  Beautiful drive.  I was really impressed with him.
    
      I would trade Favre for Bledsoe in a heartbeat.
    
      If Green Bay loses to the Bears, they will be the best team to not
      make the playoffs!
     
                                                      Tony
9.2705ANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersMon Oct 31 1994 16:036
    I meant to mention that the Vikes D has now scored 5 TD's this year and
    17 since Denny has taken over in '92.  Far and away ahead of the second
    best since that time.
    
    
    Spud
9.2706What's the deal here?EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 31 1994 16:1116
>      I like the way that you gloss over the fact that you took my earlier
>      statements about a dozen other quarterbacks completely out of context.
    
    I don't know why you're always complaining about being taken out of
    context.  You said "at this point in his career Drew is *not* a better 
    QB than Randall or Warren and anyone of a dozen QBs could have this 
    team at 3-4".  Since there are 28 teams in the league, not being any
    better than about 14 starting QBs sounds like middle of the pack to me. 
    You've made a reasonable argument and you may very well be right (I
    think he's a little bit better than that, and would be having more
    success if allowed to pick his spots) but I fail to see how I
    misconstrued your point.
    
    glenn
    
9.2707NFC CentralANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersMon Oct 31 1994 16:2025
    Re:  Tony
    
    The Pack is definately underachieving to this point.  I'm not sure what
    it is they're missing, but it might be the QB.  As I mentioned with the 
    Vikes, I think Moon has made a big difference with the teams
    performance and attitude.  Last year I don't see this team winning
    either the Miami game or last GB game that Warren pulled out with
    clutch performances.  
    
    The Pack always seems to play the Vikes tough no matter what the
    records are.  A lot of that has to do with the rivalry over the years. 
    But our thinking was, "leave Favre in there, because sooner or later he
    will screw up and throw that INT or make some other bonehead play."  I
    don't know if he's just not progressing or whether he just won't get
    much better to lead them anywhere of significance.
    
    I like the Pack's chances tonight.  I keep telling these Bears fans
    that they aren't going anywhere with Kramer either.  Much of his stats
    are fluff, but the 1-3 record speaks volumes.  I wouldn't be surprised
    to see Walsh in the second half if things don't go well against a
    pretty good Pack D.  Plus it's been raining here all night and morning
    and that sorry field is going to be a quagmire tonight.
    
    
    Spud
9.2709CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeMon Oct 31 1994 18:236
>     You just tend to run hog wild with the
>     most innocuous quotes.

Wow, who does THIS remind me of......
    

9.2710MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Oct 31 1994 19:449
  >> Wow, who does THIS remind me of......
    
     I suppose I could (should?) have left that last line off and still
     made my point. And I can only assume that you're referring to how I 
     bust your stones when you say things like, "Sam Huff had Jim Brown's 
     number" when in reality Sam has missing teeth, an 'S' shaped nose and 
     the painful memory of gaining consciousness on a training table after 
     having Brown's number tattooed on his forehead. 
9.2711CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeTue Nov 01 1994 11:4413
>     made my point. And I can only assume that you're referring to how I 
>     bust your stones when you say things like, "Sam Huff had Jim Brown's 
>     number" when in reality Sam has missing teeth, an 'S' shaped nose and 
>     the painful memory of gaining consciousness on a training table after 
>     having Brown's number tattooed on his forehead. 

Nah, you just don't do it to me, you do it to everybody....

As to Huff and Brown, so you saw a highlight where Brown creamed him.
I saw a highlight where he creamed Brown....

Big whoop.

9.2712OLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindTue Nov 01 1994 13:013
    
    
    Who won last night?
9.2713GB, 33-6HBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsTue Nov 01 1994 13:1315
Green Bay, 33-6.

Major rain storm. With winds around 20-30 mph the rain was a major
factor. 

Green Bay got a couple of break early went up 14 points and then put
Edgar Bennett to work. 

Meanwhile, Chicago was pitiful with Kramer, switched to Walsh with the
same results and was lucky to score at all.

Most of the crowd left after the retirement of Sayers' and Butkus'
jersies.

TTom
9.2714Chicago to be lucky to finish .500ANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersTue Nov 01 1994 14:067
    The Vikes were outbid for Mitchell by Detroit and Kramer elects 
    Chicago.  The Vikings then "settle" for a trade with Houston to get Moon.
    
    Talk about breaks...
    
    
    Spud                                                               
9.2715no good OHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsTue Nov 01 1994 14:1813
Chicago is in complete disarray now.

Kramer was the man but starts slow. When he went down, Walsh took over
and won. Kramer comes back and gets his job back. Same results as before,
losing.

This brings us to the Storm Bowl lasted night. Kramer looks bad, the
Bears bring in Walsh and now he looks bad, too.

Wannstedt says he'll announce his starter tomorrow but it looks like it
doesn't matter. Chicago is not dang good on offense.

TTom
9.2717Why did their fans expect so much?ANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersTue Nov 01 1994 15:169
    Re:  .2715
    
    Actually, Chicago isn't very good all around.  I really thought they
    were doing it with mirrors during the little surgence when Walsh filled
    in.  This just isn't that good a team.  I'd be surprised if they finish
    above fourth in the division.
    
    
    Spud
9.2718CAMONE::WAYA beach, a book, and a babeTue Nov 01 1994 15:2116
>
>     Actually, I read it in SI's 40 For The Ages issue. They rated Brown
>     4th, Huff didn't make the list. I'd guess that if Huff had Brown's 
>     number, he wouldn't have been the one with the busted nose, the broken 
>     teeth and the concussion.
>    

I dunno, that's kind of a stretch, I think.

I wasn't all that impressed with SI's 40th list -- some spots on that
list were dubious at best.


As I said, I've seen Giants highlight films were Huff was all over Brown.
But, I'll admit that it could have been as isolated an incident as the SI list.

9.2719Sam Huff-- choker? ;-) ;-) ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Nov 01 1994 15:4311
                        
    I believe that it was Huff himself who recounted in that issue the 
    beatings he regularly took from Jim Brown.  SI didn't make it up; Huff
    volunteered the information.  This Legend of Sam Huff just won't die 
    in New York.  He's probably something like the 30th all-time best 
    linebacker, and the record suggests that the Colts and Packers teams 
    of the day didn't have that much trouble scoring on these Giant 
    defenses in the big championship games.
    
    glenn
    
9.2720CAMONE::WAYDeath where is thy sting?Tue Nov 01 1994 16:0225
>                        
>    I believe that it was Huff himself who recounted in that issue the 
>    beatings he regularly took from Jim Brown.  SI didn't make it up; Huff
>    volunteered the information.  This Legend of Sam Huff just won't die 
>    in New York.  He's probably something like the 30th all-time best 
>    linebacker, and the record suggests that the Colts and Packers teams 
>    of the day didn't have that much trouble scoring on these Giant 
>    defenses in the big championship games.
    
Well, okay.  I didn't see the issue, I saw the list.

As I've said, I've seen some highlights films where Huff mauled Brown.


As for the record, the Giants were blown out once by the Packers (37-0 I think)
and once by the Colts.  The other games with the Packers and Colts (one
a piece) were very close affairs -- the Colts game was the famous
Sudden Death game.

Their 1963 game against the Bears was a 14-10 loss, in which Mike Ditka
played a big role for the Bears if I remember right.....


'Saw    

9.2721Just ask the analysts... ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Nov 01 1994 16:0712
> As for the record, the Giants were blown out once by the Packers (37-0 I 
> think) and once by the Colts.  The other games with the Packers and Colts 
> (one a piece) were very close affairs -- the Colts game was the famous
> Sudden Death game.
    
    Yup, but if Huff had been man enough to step up to the table and haul
    down Alan Ameche like a real linebacker in Chuck Bednarik did to Jimmy
    Taylor, who knows what might have happened... aw, I'm just bustin' you...
    
    glenn
    
9.2722Jimmy Brown/The Pack/Barry SandersSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Tue Nov 01 1994 16:0715
      I gotta jump in on this one!
    
      I find it inconceivable that Huff could have the number of
      probably the finest running back the game has ever known.
      No one player could possibly have his number.
    
      Great Packer win!
    
      Finally, I'd like to start a mini-controversy...
    
      Who's the best running back right now?  I say its Barry Sanders,
      but it seems a lot of people like Emmit Smith.  What do you
      think?
    
                                                Tony
9.2723Main Main MeansHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsTue Nov 01 1994 16:1217
The FFLers like Emmett a whole lot better'n Barry.

Barry seems to be putting up the biggest numbers thised year but he
continues to not score. Of particular note, he was caught from behind in
one of his breakaways during the Gints game.

Emmett seems to be the better big game player. Of course, Barry really
hasn't had too many big games - have to win to make playoffs, any playoff
game, etc.

Kinda lost in the shuffle in Thurman Thomas who had a big game against
the Chiefs.

And then there's my main main, Natrone Means, who looks like he's
starting to come into his own.

TTom
9.2724Marshall FaulkCNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthTue Nov 01 1994 16:142
 
9.2725SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Nov 01 1994 16:2512
|    Great Packer win!
 
Hardly an estetic masterpeice by my "other" favorite team.  
I still beleive that Farve is not an NFL starting QB, and
in fact don't beleive they will go anywhere with him at
the helm.

On the other side of the ball, is there a better defensive
player right now than Reggie White?  That guy is just 
manhandling the opposing o-linemen.

=Bob=
9.2727Paup looked goodHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsTue Nov 01 1994 16:3412
re: White.

I haven't seen that much of Green Bay but it looks like the guy who plays
on the other side of the field, Bryce Paup, really helps White out.

Lasted night, against the Bears, it seemed like ever time they tried to
double White, Paup made the play. He had one sack and a couple of
interceptions. All in all, the Packer D forced 2 other fumbles.

I'm keeping my eye on 92 and 95.

TTom
9.2730SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Nov 01 1994 16:4110
re: White and Paup

Paup's game seems to be quickness.  He gets angles, and
gets to the play quickly.  You're right, the threat of him
from the other side probably makes White more threatening.

White is just tossing people aside as if they were Kevin 
Farley.

=Bob=
9.2731Color me bitter... ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Nov 01 1994 16:4314
>       I think 90% of this Sam Huff stuff and guff was made up
>       by the New York media.
    
    Yeah, it's kind of ludicrous that in the present-day recounting of
    those glorious days, the Packers and Giants dominate the spotlight.
    The Packers deserve it.  Meanwhile the images of legitimately great 
    players and teams like the '58-'59 Baltimore Colts fade from memory.  
    Ain't no one from any of those Giant defenses that was as good as 
    Gino Marchetti, not one.  Frank Gifford couldn't carry Lenny Moore's
    jock, etc., etc.  It goes on and on... ;-)
    
    glenn
     
9.2732Where is....?ODIXIE::ZOGRANHear me now, believe me laterTue Nov 01 1994 16:485
    Just a quick question - Whatever happened to Christian Okoye(sp), the
    KC running back?
    
    UMDan
    
9.2733just ask CarterHBAHBA::HAASbeen to the mountain topsTue Nov 01 1994 16:529
>White is just tossing people aside as if they were Kevin 
>Farley.

Just talk to Chris Carter who made the big mistake of trying to block
Reggie lasted week. Reggie threw Carter back so far and hard that he
almost tackled Moon. Reggie, not through on the play, gave Moon a
standing 8-count for a sack.

TTom
9.2734CC, don't mess with them big boysANGLIN::WIERSBECKChicago has wimpy wintersTue Nov 01 1994 17:014
    That was one of the funniest looking plays of the year.
    
    
    Spud
9.2735CAMONE::WAYDeath where is thy sting?Tue Nov 01 1994 17:0415
re Barry getting caught from behind:

	It took one of, if not THE, fastest guy on the Jints to catch him.



re "old" Giants teams:

	Yabbut, I'll bet you'd bet hard pressed to find better coaching
	than they had -- Lombardi and Landry arguably were two of the
	best to ever become head coaches.....



'Saw
9.2736Ki-Jana Carter is the next Marshall Faulk...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Nov 01 1994 17:341
    
9.2737I had to askCSC32::J_HENSONand it's still too short!Tue Nov 01 1994 20:386
>>                     <<< Note 9.2731 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>
>>                          -< Color me bitter... ;-) >-

>>   Frank Gifford couldn't carry Lenny Moore's jock, etc., etc.

Why would he want to?
9.2738Come on WaugamainBSS::MENDEZTue Nov 01 1994 22:275
    reply .2736
    
    Ki Jana Carter isn't even as good as Rashan Salaam! ;-
    
    Frank 
9.2740What's best back in the country Errict Rhett up to? ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Nov 02 1994 12:3619
     >> -< Ki-Jana Carter is the next Marshall Faulk... >-
     >
     >   Marshall Faulk is barely the next Marshall Faulk yet. I'd
     >   like to think that we learned something from the premature
     >   coronation of Drew Bledsoe as the next Dan Marino.    
    
    I'm just offering my opinion of which players teams should be looking 
    at in next season's draft, as potential impact-type players.  Two years 
    ago I liked Bledsoe, last year it was Faulk, this year I'm very much
    impressed with the speed and power combination of Ki-Jana Carter, who
    is better than any other running back I've seen this year, including
    Salaam and Tyrone Wheatley.  But you're absolutely correct in your
    brilliant deduction that come draft time, as in the past none of these 
    players will have established NFL careers as a basis for the talent 
    evaluators to go on.  I'm impressed Tommy...
    
    glenn
     
9.2742No opinion, however simple, safe if Tommy's in town...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Nov 02 1994 13:2023
                                                               
>      Yup, you really went way out on a limb with those two. Gutsy
>      move. Drew was only everyone's pick to be either number one or
>      two and Faulk was the consensus pick as the best back in the draft.

    Well, I admit that the opinions were innocent enough, but damned if
    you didn't vehemently disagree on each one and give me piles of grief 
    just the same...  ;-)
    
>      My point is 
>      simply that you rushed to crown Drew after two whole games. The sad 
>      fact *now* is that he's had two games in a row that were as bad as the 
>      first two were good and now we have Cleveland, Minnesota and Junior 
>      Say-oww! coming to town and we could be 3-8 afterward (remember when 
>      you pointed out that Drew had us "with a winning record" when we were 
>      3-2? Please contain yourself.) and Drew could be in a wheelchair.
                                                                
    My opinion on Bledsoe hasn't changed one bit (go ahead and find the
    most supposedly outrageous statement I ever made), but try not to 
    sound so happy about the prospects of the next few weeks...
    
    glenn
    
9.2744It's vantage point: I'm looking up from college, from youthEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Nov 02 1994 15:0943
    
>     But honestly, the kid has played
>     nine whole games as a pro and his career could end next game with-
>     out him having played a whole season and some college kid is "the next
>     Marshall Faulk"?                  
    
    Also seriously, I didn't mean anything more by that than "next
    rookie-of-the-year candidate to burst on the scene", or similar.  You 
    take it one step at a time, because I agree that anything can happen, 
    most of which are out of the player's control.  The talent is there in 
    the here and now, that's all I'm saying.
    
>     I'm sure at least your opinion that he's a complete qb has changed.
>     I'd be shocked if it hadn't.
    
    I don't believe he's a complete QB, in the sense where "complete" means
    great, or near-great.  I said that before.  I told you that I likely 
    misread the meaning of that particular quote from Parcells, as Bob Ryan 
    did.  I was wrong on that point.  However, I do still agree with the 
    sentiment (not necessarily Parcells') that if this is all there is (and
    it's kind of a dumb "what if", because it just doesn't work that way;
    players get better or they regress), it still ain't bad at all, and 
    overall is comparable to what many teams only have with more 
    experienced QBs (I'd use the mediocre Neil O'Donnell as an example 
    from another team I follow-- I believe that if a team like the 
    Steelers had a Drew Bledsoe, they'd be a real threat in the very near 
    term, if not this season).  Whether that means "complete" or not 
    doesn't really matter.   
    
    The "euphoria" part of it doesn't much enter into it with me.  I'm not 
    even that big a Pats' fan.  I guess I just have a different way of 
    looking at it.  First and foremost, I'm a college football fan above 
    an NFL one, and part of that is showing some interest and excitement in 
    these young players as they hit the big time, regardless of where.  I'll 
    root for Ki-Jana Carter if he becomes a New York Giant, even (I draw the
    line at the Cowboys).  The Pats piling up some losses as Bledsoe takes 
    his lumps and makes mistakes doesn't bother me, not even a little bit
    (unless he gets hurt), because I can maintain interest in even 
    inconsistent game-to-game individual efforts on a team that at this 
    time is still expected to lose.
    
    glenn
    
9.274525022::BREENGet these mutts away from meWed Nov 02 1994 17:1112
    I missed Sunday and the Jets game but prior to that I thought that
    Bledsoe's arm looked tired.  This 55 per game plus all the throws in
    practice may have taken it's toll.
    
    It finally seems like the media and some fans have taken the gloves off
    with Parcells.  His golden persona seems to be tarnished a bit.  I've
    never seen anyone given the slack he's had in this town.
    
    I do admit that his teams have generally executed better than before. 
    I'd even say that if he'd just kept Russell he'd be two games better.
    
    billte
9.2747PushedSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOThu Nov 03 1994 13:503
The Patsies were pushed out to 4:00 again this week.

t
9.2749Consider the Other Ten Men On The FieldSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Nov 03 1994 16:3120
      Back to Barry Sanders...
    
      Just to include the simply notion that it is a team game and what
      might Sanders do as a Cowboy and what might Smith do as a Lion?
    
      I read in the previous Sunday Boston Globe where they discussed
      Erik Williams and how his loss will hurt.  They mentioned the
      Cowboy drive in the 2nd half that came after the Buffalo 3 and out
      after their turnover.  It was all Emmit behind Williams.
    
      And believe me...I watched the Pack play Detroit then Dallas in the
      playoffs.  I was a LOT more worried about Aikmen than Kramer.  Much
      more worried about their o-line.  More concerned with Ervin than
      Moore, etc., etc.
    
      I'm only one opinion, but if someone backs me against the wall and
      tells me my football team can have Sanders or Smith, I would reply
      (in a heartbeat) SANDERS!!!!
    
                                                    Tony
9.2750ELMAGO::BENBACAAtDEC18Years.ItAllEndsNovember18th.Thu Nov 03 1994 16:451
     He's yours! Take him.
9.2751My .02SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Nov 04 1994 11:0916
'tween Sanders and Smith,

	I'd take one over the other based on my O-line.  Sanders seems to 
create things, and gets yardage despite the offensive line.  But he's likely
to be run down after a few yards and doesn't (in my mind) really spring big
gains that often.

	Smith on the other hand, needs a big line to open the initial seam.
He really needs to get up to speed, and that takes opening a spot for him.  Once
going, Emmit is incredibly tough to stop, and if difficult to run down.  Once
he's gotten past the first 5 yards, watch out.

	Both are a joy to watch though.  Sanders in my mind is pure finesse,
while Smith is a power back IMO.  

	zamboni
9.2752He Springs The Big OnesSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Nov 04 1994 11:2722
      re: zamboni
    
        I agreed with much of your note save the part about Sander's
        not making many big gains.  Actually, he springs the big gain
        more than anyone in the NFL for at least the last 10 years!!
        Just check game stats on longest runs from scrimmage.
    
        Also, he is pretty fast.  When the Lions played the Pack in
        the playoffs last year, Sanders had a couple wide runs where
        he just blew by people.
    
        I don't know about that Giants play mentioned a few back, but
        one person said the guy that caught up to him just happened
        to be the fastest guy on the Giant's roster.
    
        The only edge I might give Smith is durability and how good
        a straight north-south runner he is.  Smith makes good subtle
        cuts where he basically is still going north-south and yet the
        tackler often doesn't have a solid enough hold of him to get
        him down.                     
    
                                                       Tony
9.2753He does?SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Nov 04 1994 19:5317
>        I agreed with much of your note save the part about Sander's
>        not making many big gains.  Actually, he springs the big gain
>        more than anyone in the NFL for at least the last 10 years!!
>        Just check game stats on longest runs from scrimmage.

	Really?  I've never compared the stats of the two of them, and am
basing my opinions on having watched the two of them on the tube.  Granted it's
slightly slanted and Smith is on in New England much more than Sanders is.

	Plus every Lions game I catch Sanders seems to have a mellow day.  Sure
he gets 100+ yards, but all in little 3 and 4 yard gains mostly.  No big rips.
Maybe I just catch him on bad days?

	Does anyone have stats on the number of 10+ yard gains these two backs
have had?

	zamboni
9.2754All Purpose Running BAckjFABBIT::S_NACCACHIANMon Nov 07 1994 14:2910
    
    	
    	  What about playing when they are not 100%. Smith always does the
    job, even without being 100%. Sanders gets injured easier probably due
    to his running style. I had to agree that Sanders is a better runner than
    Smith. But Smith is a better running back than Sanders. Smith is more 
    dangerous due to his receiving as well as running. I think he's a
    better blocker too.
    
    								Serge 
9.2756CAMONE::WAYTake me, subcreature!Mon Nov 07 1994 15:121
I think Emmitt is a better runner, but I'll bet Barry is the better driver 8^)
9.2757Means is having probs in the red zone latelyMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 07 1994 17:4218
    Marshall is doomed, its tough to be a great Running back when your
    picked and predicted to be a great one :-)
    
    Although wasnt sanders drafted very HIGH, I know emmitt was a middle
    to late pick, Bettis a late round, Means 2nd round, not sure on Thomas
    either....
    
    Value is looked at in soo many different ways... emmitt/marshall lead
    in TD's, Sanders in Yards, but in my FFL League Means is the leading
    scorer as you get bonus pts for going over 100 yrds :-).  So who is
    the best, tough to say but being lumped together with any of these
    guys means your successful
    
    Top 5: Emmitt, Sanders, Means, Thomas, Faulk
    
    What order, would be very hard to say, but Id list Faulk at #5
    
    							mab
9.2758BSS::MARLANDMon Nov 07 1994 17:502
    if I remember right Sanders was the number one pick in 1989 and Bettis
    was number 9 in 1993.
9.2759thomas second round because of his kneesCNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthMon Nov 07 1994 17:575
 thomas was picked in the second round and Emitt was I think either the 3rd
 or 4th pick in the draft his year. 

 mike
9.2760OLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindMon Nov 07 1994 18:124
    
    
    I think Emmitt went a little later in the first round and was a steal
    for Dallas at the time, but who can remember what happened 5 years ago. 
9.2762CNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthMon Nov 07 1994 18:285
 with all the early draft picks Dallas had I seriously doubt that Emitt
 went that late........

 mike
9.2763CNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthMon Nov 07 1994 18:332
 I stand corrected pulled out a magazine Emitt was the 17th pick that year.....
9.2764opinions on RB'sBSS::MENDEZMon Nov 07 1994 18:3415
    I would certainly take Bettis over Faulk.  I think that also Watters
    is a more established back as well as Foster.  Faulk has a great deal
    of potential but I think he has some work to do to be in the top five
    among running backs.  The Fantasy Football Leagues cannot take into
    consideration what a back really means to a team.  For example:  There
    have been years that Leroy Hoard, Reggie Cobb, Vince Workman, Brad
    Baxter, etc were leading ffl statistics.  How many of those would you
    take over Foster, Allen, Sanders, Smith, Means, Thomas, Watters,
    Hampton, Bettis, and others???  It is when a RB gains yards that
    determine how good a back is..  ESmith has a great line but he gets
    alot of yards in the second half and especially the 4th quarter.  Same
    with Sanders, Thomas, Bettis, Foster, Hampton.  Those guys get the
    tough yards even when the opposing defense knows they have to be
    stopped.  To me it is between smith and sanders.
    
9.2765Faulk's a game-breaker, durability will be only questionEDWIN::WAUGAMANBrowns rule, Pats SIP!Mon Nov 07 1994 19:1031
    
> It is when a RB gains yards that determine how good a back is.
    
    I don't know anything about FFL stats, but going into the weekend's
    games, Faulk was still 2nd in the entire NFL in rushing yards, with a 
    good average.  He can't be considered "established" but only because he's 
    a rookie; it goes without saying that even the best have to start from
    that position.  I'd take him over Watters right now, though, definitely.
    I think he can do more things than Bettis, too, and should surpass him
    if he doesn't get hurt (Bettis is a horse; he's just going to pound it
    out 30 times a game, 3.5 a pop).  Foster's continued injury history 
    already limits his practical worth.
    
    As for this weekend, Faulk simply didn't get the ball.  I turned the game
    on in the 2nd quarter and the Colts continued to try and pass with an
    injured and ineffective Majkowski; I wondered if Faulk was hurting or 
    something.  I don't know why the Colts played it this way, even after
    they took the lead.  But still, I thought he showed good hands and
    skills as a pass receiver (he got wide open deep a couple of times only
    to have the ball overthrown), and the moves and speed on the cutback
    run were unmistakable.  5 yards a carry on the ground, 5 catches, 
    43 yards, that's not a bad day at all.  What does he mean to his team?
    Well, as usual, his 110 total yards were over half the Colts' offense;
    Faulk continues to lead the league in percentage of his team's offense, 
    by far, because the team offense is so lousy and he's the only real
    weapon.  I think he's a hell of an all-around back.  The only thing I'm 
    not sold on yet is his ability to take it 25 times a game, every game, 
    like Sanders and Smith can do. 
    
    glenn
    
9.2766Yes Id take faulk over bettis/watters etcMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 07 1994 19:476
    I dont have the exact stats but Means is #1 in the AFC.  I beleive he
    is up approx 20yrds on Faulk and has already has his bye week (Faulk
    is on a bye this week).  So Id say Means will be up around 100+Yrds
    on faulk after this weekend...
    
    								mab
9.2767Always liked himBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Nov 09 1994 13:367

	I know we like to keep politics out of this file, but on a related
	sprots note, Steve Largent has been elected as a congressman from
	Oklahoma.

	Kevin
9.2768Bozworth can't be far behind :*)AD::HEATHDawgs rule Pats sipWed Nov 09 1994 14:478
    
    
    
    
      I was wondering if he got that house seat.  No mention of him on the
    idiot box last night. (I did turn in at 10:00 though).
    
    Jerry
9.2769Why Me??!STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Wed Nov 09 1994 15:0534
      As a Packer fan, it is time for a little 'Barry Sanders' 
      draft recap and as I dwell upon it, I can have a real nice
      puk!!!
    
      Going into the last game of the season, Green Bay played 
      against the Cardinals and were something like 8 point under-
      dogs.  Lose and they have the top pick in the draft which
      everyone knew would be Aikman.
    
      Of course they win.
    
      Every GM today would acknowledge that their #2 choice in the
      draft would have been 
    
      TONY MANDARICH
    
      The following is the draft order...
    
      1) Dallas - Troy Aikmen
    
      2) Green Bay - Tony Mandarich
    
      3) Detroit - Barry Sanders
    
      4) Kansas City - Derrick Thomas
    
      So the Pack is sandwiched between perhaps the finest quarterback
      and running back in the  NFL.  A spot later is one of the finer
      LB's.
    
      Needless to say, its not one of those things I like to dwell
      on!!!
    
                                                 Tony
9.2770CSC32::J_HENSONand it's still too short!Wed Nov 09 1994 15:2612
>>              <<< Note 9.2769 by STRATA::BARBIERI "God cares." >>>
>>                                 -< Why Me??! >-

>>      1) Dallas - Troy Aikmen
>>    
>>      2) Green Bay - Tony Mandarich

What's even weirder is that Tom Landry, who was still with the Cowboys
at the time, wanted to draft Mandarich over Aikman.  He was basically
forced to take Aikman.

Jerry
9.2771;-)FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Nov 09 1994 16:281
    Who's Mandarich?
9.277257045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Nov 09 1994 21:236
    re: a few back
    
    Jim(?) Watts a former OU player was elected to the House from Oklahoma.
    
    The Cray Met
    
9.2773J.C.BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Nov 09 1994 21:4113
>       <<< Note 9.2772 by 57045::FRANCUS "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>
>
>    re: a few back
>    
>    Jim(?) Watts a former OU player was elected to the House from Oklahoma.
>    
>    The Cray Met


    Rush said it was J.C. "Julias Caesar" Watts, Republican.

    Kevin    

9.277457045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Nov 10 1994 03:024
    oh no you listen to Rush; sigh :-(
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2775CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Thu Nov 10 1994 11:322
Largent, Watts, and Jim Bunning (re-elected) were the "Sports Ticket" last
night, as reported on the news.....
9.2776Old St. Louis southpaw25022::BREENThu Nov 10 1994 13:591
    Is Vinegar Bend Mizell still in Congress?
9.2777Big DaddyHBAHBA::HAASAnd this am the way it goes.Thu Nov 10 1994 14:116
Big Daddy Don Garlitz also won a seat in Florida.

Richard Petty was running for a state post but I haven't heard if'n he
won.

TTom
9.2778CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Thu Nov 10 1994 14:134
>Big Daddy Don Garlitz also won a seat in Florida.

Cool....

9.2779Boomer Sooner...EDWIN::WAUGAMANBrowns rule, Pats SIP!Thu Nov 10 1994 14:3514
    
>    Rush said it was J.C. "Julias Caesar" Watts, Republican.
    
    Yep, Husker-killer Watts becomes only the second black Republican in
    the House.  Sumpin' must have happened to J.C. since the time he sang
    "What the World Needs Now is Love Sweet Love" to a national TV audience
    before going out and beating the Seminoles in the Orange Bowl. ;-) Rush
    sucking up to Julius Caesar Watts; I think I'm going to be ill...
    
    My boyhood hero and former NE Patriot Jack Mildren, being a Dem, of
    course lost in the governor's race.
    
    glenn
     
9.2780ODIXIE::ZOGRANwhatchyalookinat?Thu Nov 10 1994 15:113
    I believe that Garlits lost (at least that's what my paper says).
    
    UMDan
9.2781could beHBAHBA::HAASAnd this am the way it goes.Thu Nov 10 1994 15:147
ESPN said he won but I don't know fer sure.

They had a little blurb about ex-sportsters and they showed Largent,
Bunning, and some other guy winning and Mario Cuomo losing. Did Cuomo
play sports or is he headed to some commish job?

TTom
9.2782PTOS01::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm DTN: 422-7253Thu Nov 10 1994 15:191
    I think Cuomo played college baseball.
9.2783at least North lost57045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Nov 10 1994 15:365
    Cuomo played minor league baseball
    Bush played in college.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2784just in case you were wonderingMKFSA::LONGLike your freedom? Thank a Vet!Thu Nov 10 1994 15:398
      >>                    -< Old St. Louis southpaw >-

      >>Is Vinegar Bend Mizell still in Congress?
    
    He played for the Bucs on the 1960 World Series team, too.
    
    
    billl
9.2785TOOK::HALPINThe BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIPThu Nov 10 1994 16:046
    
    
    	Cuomo's name is being mentioned as a possible Baseball Commish
    now....
    
    
9.2786Slip out the back JackBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredMon Nov 14 1994 16:076

	Report out of Houston says that Pardee has been canned after yerterday's
	loss to the Bengals.

	Kevin
9.2787itemsHBAHBA::HAASAnd this am the way it goes.Mon Nov 14 1994 16:0827
Wild weekend in the NFL.

Chicago faked a FG at Miami that looked like it was choreographed by the
Three Stooges.  Da Bears snapped the ball to the up man Curtis Conway
who shoulda been tackled a couple of times behind the line but somehow
got away. He threw a dead duck that Billy Kilmer woulda been proud of,
bounced off of a Bear and 2 Dolphins and into the hands of Keith Jennings
who scored.

In another sign that the Apocalypse is nigh, Jim Everett is now tied with
Hall of Famer Roger Staubach at 156 career TDs.

Jeff Blake, the newly installed Bengal QB Jeff Blake, of semi-local East
Carolina fame, was carted off the field but came back to lead Cincy over
hapless Houston. Attention Fantasy Footballers: Blake finished with 4
TDs.

Barry Sanders ran for 237 yards and no scores. Emmitt Smith lost ground
in his quest for a 4th rushing title, finishing with a mere 78 yards. But
Smith scored twice.

Cleveland still hasn't allowed anyone to rush for 100 yards and this
streak shouldn't be threatened at KC.

Dan Marino has now thrown for 20 TDs for 11 straight years, a_NFL record.

TTom
9.2788pointsHBAHBA::HAASAnd this am the way it goes.Tue Nov 15 1994 17:0468
Some numbers:

Here's the points for, points against and difference. Then it's sorted by
points scored, then points against, and then difference.

Enjoy,

TTom

Team       G    PF    PA  Diff      Team       G    PF    PA  Diff
MIA       10   239   187    52      SF        10   295   186   109
BUF       10   205   198     7      DAL       10   262   141   121
NYJ       10   173   184   -11      SD        10   243   164    79
IND       10   216   233   -17      MIA       10   239   187    52
NE        10   210   239   -29      MIN       10   224   164    60
CLE       10   219   118   101      WAS       10   220   279   -59
PIT       10   176   156    20      DEN       10   220   243   -23
CIN       10   175   251   -76      CLE       10   219   118   101
HOU       10   147   218   -71      IND       10   216   233   -17
SD        10   243   164    79      PHI       10   216   174    42
KC        10   195   192     3      NE        10   210   239   -29
LRD       10   203   222   -19      NO        10   209   261   -52
DEN       10   220   243   -23      GB        10   205   143    62
SEA       10   195   196    -1      BUF       10   205   198    20
DAL       10   262   141   121      LRD       10   203   222   -19
PHI       10   216   174    42      ATL       10   200   226   -26
ARI       10   126   198   -72      DET       10   199   217   -18
NYG       10   171   220   -49      SEA       10   195   196    -1
WAS       10   220   279   -59      KC        10   195   192     3
MIN       10   224   164    60      LRM       10   179   197   -18
CHI       10   172   182   -10      PIT       10   176   156     7
GB        10   205   143    62      CIN       10   175   251   -76
DET       10   199   217   -18      NYJ       10   173   184   -11
TB        10   124   229  -105      CHI       10   172   182   -10
SF        10   295   186   109      NYG       10   171   220   -49
ATL       10   200   226   -26      HOU       10   147   218   -71
LRM       10   179   197   -18      ARI       10   126   198   -72
NO        10   209   261   -52      TB        10   124   229  -105

Team       G    PF    PA  Diff      Team       G    PF    PA  Diff
CLE       10   219   118   101      DAL       10   262   141   121
DAL       10   262   141   121      SF        10   295   186   109
GB        10   205   143    62      CLE       10   219   118   101
PIT       10   176   156    20      SD        10   243   164    79
MIN       10   224   164    60      GB        10   205   143    62
SD        10   243   164    79      MIN       10   224   164    60
PHI       10   216   174    42      MIA       10   239   187    52
CHI       10   172   182   -10      PHI       10   216   174    42
NYJ       10   173   184   -11      PIT       10   176   156    20
SF        10   295   186   109      BUF       10   205   198     7
MIA       10   239   187    52      KC        10   195   192     3
KC        10   195   192     3      SEA       10   195   196    -1
SEA       10   195   196    -1      CHI       10   172   182   -10
LRM       10   179   197   -18      NYJ       10   173   184   -11
BUF       10   205   198     7      IND       10   216   233   -17
ARI       10   126   198   -72      DET       10   199   217   -18
DET       10   199   217   -18      LRM       10   179   197   -18
HOU       10   147   218   -71      LRD       10   203   222   -19
NYG       10   171   220   -49      DEN       10   220   243   -23
LRD       10   203   222   -19      ATL       10   200   226   -26
ATL       10   200   226   -26      NE        10   210   239   -29
TB        10   124   229  -105      NYG       10   171   220   -49
IND       10   216   233   -17      NO        10   209   261   -52
NE        10   210   239   -29      WAS       10   220   279   -59
DEN       10   220   243   -23      HOU       10   147   218   -71
CIN       10   175   251   -76      ARI       10   126   198   -72
NO        10   209   261   -52      CIN       10   175   251   -76
WAS       10   220   279   -59      TB        10   124   229  -105
9.2789Rison suspendedODIXIE::ZOGRANOne hand clappingWed Nov 16 1994 18:156
    Falcons suspended Andre (I smell smoke) Rison for 1 game (vs Denver)
    for breaking team rules.  Coach Jones said that he had warned Andre last
    week about this.  Details as they become available.
     
    UMDan
    
9.2790Dave Brown back at Giants helmHBAHBA::HAASAnd this am the way it goes.Thu Nov 17 1994 16:136
Dan Reeves flipped another coin and it came up Dave Brown.

Graham goes to the bench. I guess ol' Dan dint like the way he looked
agin the Cards.

TTom
9.2791FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Nov 17 1994 17:292
    Just when Collie Boy said a QB needs more than 1 week to show his
    wares.
9.2792CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Nov 21 1994 12:1312
I saw a GREAT TD last night in the Rams-49ers game, but I only saw
the tail end of it.

I was kind of busy at the time, had the TV on and was keeping one eye on
it, and I saw #81 on the Rams doing he best scramble and dash through
the 49er defense.

With his number, I thought it might have been a pass or it could have
been an end-around or something.  Even with all the replays I never saw
the first part of the play.

Can someone fill me in?
9.2793HTHWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MLets Go HoyasMon Nov 21 1994 12:259
    
    
    
         It was a reverse.
    
      I think his name was Kinchen?
    
    
    Chap
9.2794CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Nov 21 1994 12:288
>         It was a reverse.

Cool.
    
>      I think his name was Kinchen?
    
I didn't catch his name, but I thought the run was great -- lots of
second effort.....
9.2795CSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Mon Nov 21 1994 13:3112
>>            <<< Note 9.2794 by CAMONE::WAY "The Devil's to pay!" >>>

>>I didn't catch his name, but I thought the run was great -- lots of
>>second effort.....

The guy's name is Kinchon.  He's a 3rd year man out of LSU.  And, San
Francisco only had 10 men on the field.  Deion had left the field as it
was a short yardage situation, and no one else came in.  The play broke
the line of scrimmage at the place where Deion (or whomever) should
have been.  Regardless, though, it was a great run.

Jerry
9.2796Todd KinchenHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Nov 21 1994 13:5111
The guy's name is Todd Kinchen. He's from LSU and the play in question
was a_end around. Overall, Kinchen looked good enough to play for the
Niners.

Several other higlights included a Jerry Rice TD where he carried a
linebacker into the end zone and a Flipper Anderson TD beating Neon
completely for a_uncontested TD. Chris Miller played the best game I ever
seen him but San Fran continued there dominance over the Rams to win
31-27.

TTom
9.2798CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Mon Nov 21 1994 15:1710
Quick question:

	
	How many wildcard teams and what's the playoff format.

	I can't remember if there are three WC teams, and two of them
	play each other to eliminate one, or what.....


	I guess the mind is the first thing to go.....
9.2799OLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindMon Nov 21 1994 15:219
    
    
    Three wildcard and worst Div. winner play Dec 31/Jan 1
    
    Winners play the other two Div. champs Jan7/8
    
    Winners play for Conf Champ Jan 15
    
    SB Jan 29
9.2800collisionHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Nov 21 1994 15:238
Saw, you got 3 divisional winners and 3 wild cards in each confernce.

The opening round of playoffs has the worst divisional winner against the
worst wild card. The 2 other wild cards play each other, hosted by the
better of 'em.  Winners advance to the nexted round and take on the 2
best best divisional winners.

TTom
9.2801Exciting but not very efficient or productive on the day...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Nov 21 1994 15:2617
    
>     Did anyone watch Philly-Arizona yesterday? The play, where
>     Randall escaped the grasp of a Philly defender, pitched the 
>     ball to Herschel and then took out two Cardinal defenders with
>     a picture perfect block, was exhibit A on why Randall is one of
>     only a handful of players in the NFL who are themselves worth 
>     the price of admission.
    
    Terrible clock and play management on the last two possessions, though.  
    Arizona came up with a good pass rush but Cunningham wasted far too 
    much time scrambling around and eventually either getting sacked or 
    having to throw off-balance, instead of just standing in there, getting 
    rid of the ball and taking his chances (even if he were to be
    intercepted).  I wasn't terribly impressed, and Philly may be fizzling.
    
    glenn
    
9.2803SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensMon Nov 21 1994 15:466
    
    That's at least the 3rd game this year the Cards have screwed up clock
    management, and gotten away with it.  It's gotta catch up to them
    sooner or later.
    
    brews 
9.2804PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeTue Nov 22 1994 04:0414
    Houscum again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory, blowing a 14-7
    lead in the fourth to lose on a FG on the nexted to last play of the
    game.
    
    Final
    
    Hapless Giants	17
    More Hapless Oilers 14
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    
    JaKe
    
    
9.2805More like 13-10CSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Tue Nov 22 1994 11:4618
>>          <<< Note 9.2804 by PTOS02::JACOBR "snoring thru my life" >>>

>>    Final
    
>>    Hapless Giants	17
>>    More Hapless Oilers 14
    
    JaKe,

	I don't know what game you were watching, but the score on
	the one that I watched was 13-10, Giants.  Other than this
	slight discrepency, though, I agree with you assessment
	of the game.

   Jerry
    
    

9.2806CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Tue Nov 22 1994 12:021
Even Dan Reeves gets lucky once in a while.....
9.2807PTOS01::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeTue Nov 22 1994 12:078
    RE wrong score, ya, I noticed that this am.  Nathan(5 yr old) was
    barfing his guts out lasted night(musta been a bad jar of Cheez-Whiz)
    and I got a little corn-fused.
    
    Sorry
    
    JaKe
    
9.2808SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensTue Nov 22 1994 16:0011
    
    Did anyone else think that Graham, the Giants QB looked familiar on
    the lasted play of the 1sted half?  I mean after he smartly ran out the
    clock so the Giants couldn't kick a FG and he had a bewildered look on
    his face.  He looked just like Woody HArrelson.  No, not the Woody
    Harrelson who was a bon vivant and man-about-town in Natural Born
    Killers, or even the Woody Harrelson who was the paragon of virtue in
    White Man Cain't Jump, but the Woody Harrelson who didn't know his ass
    from a time out in Cheers.  Sheeit, he was a dead ringer for the guy.
    
    brews 
9.2809CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Tue Nov 22 1994 16:304
Kent Graham has always had that "My momma was a moron, my daddy was
an idjit" look......

I'd have that look all the time if I played for Dan Reeves too....8^)
9.2810Results??25022::BREENAnd what of the shaftMon Nov 28 1994 13:173
    Anyone got full thur-sun nite results.
    
    Can't find the 49ers score and thurs results are from memory
9.2811NETCAD::NISKALAMoisten needle before inserting.Mon Nov 28 1994 13:212
    Niners play tonite and in the AMERICAN_FOOTBALL conference, the
    Thursday stats/results are posted...
9.2812]OLD1S::CADZILLA2How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blindMon Nov 28 1994 13:212
    
    The 9er's play tonight
9.2813thanks - don't know how I forgot25022::BREENAnd what of the shaftMon Nov 28 1994 14:231
    Thanks, the game I missed was Minn-Tampa bay.  Another dog winner.
9.2814one matteredHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Nov 28 1994 14:416
A grand total of one spread mattered, the Denver-Cincy game where the
Donks won but dint cover. 

For the rest, whoever won the game won that other thing.

TTom
9.2815SF, maybe Dallas, SD, and some othersHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Nov 30 1994 15:0819
Update on playoffs:

San Francisco (10-2) has clinched the NFC West. If'n they win the rest of
their games, they will clinch the home field until the Super Bowl. 

Here's what others can clinch thised weekend.

Dallas (10-2) can clinch the NFC East if'n they beat or tie the 
Philadelphia. Even if'n they lose, they can clinch a wild card with a 
Minnesota loss, Detroit tie or loss, or a_Atlanta tie of loss.

San Diego (9-3) can clinch the AFC West with a victory against the 
Raiders and a KC loss to Denver.


Miami (8-4), Pittsburgh (9-3), and Cleveland (9-3) can clinch wild cards 
with the right combinations of winning while others lose.

TTom
9.2817teammates not that happyHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Dec 01 1994 19:237
Evidently, not everyone is that big on Marshall, including some of his
teammates. As Faulk gets closer to the rookie team record for running
yardage, the complaints are starting to be heard that he's getting the
ball so often that the other team can focus on him and has been slowing
his running and hence the overall offense has suffered.

TTom
9.2818Blake not eligible for RoYTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 Baby - unbelievable!!!Thu Dec 01 1994 19:244
    Jeff Blake's not a rookie, Tommy.  Was with the Jets lasted year.  They
    cut him this summer to protect Glenn Foley!
    
    NAZZ
9.2819Are these 2-month-old complaints? Faulk's carries fallen off...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Dec 01 1994 20:2417
    
> Evidently, not everyone is that big on Marshall, including some of his
> teammates. As Faulk gets closer to the rookie team record for running
> yardage, the complaints are starting to be heard that he's getting the
> ball so often that the other team can focus on him and has been slowing
> his running and hence the overall offense has suffered.
    
    You wouldn't know it from this past game against the Pats and the couple
    previous.  Faulk wasn't handed the ball much at all (he did get some
    action as a receiver).  I agreed with the ESPN announcers; the time
    comes when you forget about the decoy and go with your strengths. The
    Colts went too much with the pass; it's not a team strength and not
    only wasn't it productive, its (Majkowski's) mistakes cost them the 
    game in the second half.
    
    glenn
    
9.2820Bad news from SeattleWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MSTEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAMFri Dec 02 1994 10:499
    
    
         Chris Warren and 2 other teammates were in a car accident last
    Night. Warren has 2 broken ribs and is in jail for Vehicular assault.
    
        On of the other guys is in critical condition with a neck injury?
    
    
    Chap
9.2821ESPN Gameday interviewODIXIE::ZOGRANOne hand clappingFri Dec 02 1994 12:3211
    Saw a quick clip on ESPN Halftime last night for an interview that will
    appear on ESPN Gameday this Sunday.  It was with Stanley Wilson, RB
    with Cincy on their Superbowl team.  He apparently disappeared the
    night before the big game.  On the clip last night, Wilson admits to
    being holed up in a hotel room with a bag of coke, snorting and smoking
    away.  I don't seem to remeber much about the game except that Montana
    led the 'Niners to a victory with a last minute drive.
    
    May be interesting viewing.
    
    UMDan  
9.2822CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Fri Dec 02 1994 12:351
Who won last night, anyway?
9.2823WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MSTEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAMFri Dec 02 1994 12:395
    
    
       Minny 33 -27 in OT
    
       K. Butler missed a 40 yd FG in OT and it cost them big!!!!!!!!!
9.28243 Seahawks injured in a car accident.TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Dec 02 1994 13:2524
    
    
    
    	Three Seahawks injuried in a car accident last night:
    
    	Chris Warren - two fractured ribs on the right side, treated and
    		       released.
    
    	Lamar Smith -  chip fracture in his spine and left ankle. He is
    		       listed in satisfactory condition and is being held
    		       for observation.
    
    	 Mike Frier -  is listed is serious condition with a severe neck injury. 
    
    
    	Warren's black Chevy Blazer collided with the power pole at 8:41 P.M.
    PST and knocked out electricity to several thousand residents in the
    area.
    
    
    JimH
     
    
    
9.2825oopsHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 02 1994 13:3316
re: lasted night.

Butler missing the FG cost who bigtime? ;-)

re: Stanley Wilson

The guy was such a_addict he couldn't do without one night before the big
game. He reacted to this like he missed the bus or something. Then he
says that if'n he had played, the Bengals woulda won. I'm not too sure
about the part where Joe loses the super bowl but, in any case, it's just
more shame on hisself. 

I'm gonna try to catch the interview - it'll be hard to miss even if'n
all you watch is Sprotscenter.

TTom
9.2826As usual Boston tops Ohio25022::BREENBut in the land of the One-eyed MenFri Dec 02 1994 15:0910
    didn't half the Patriots team pull the same cocaine snorting, partying
    stunt before the '86 superbowl.
    
    Pat Sullivan tried to hide it, Ron Borges uncovered it and reported it,
    Everyone connected to the Pats blamed Ron and boycotted him to the
    extent that he started reporting boxing full time and other
    non-football stuff.
    
    But now he's back to #1 Globe Pats coverage with boxing coverage of big
    matches.
9.2827WMOIS::BALL_KMon Dec 05 1994 11:562
    Does anybody know who the reporter was that Parcells chewed out in the
    post game press conference yesterday? ...funny stuff
9.2829Only read the quote wish I could have seen itAD::HEATHCan the Pats duplilcate it???Mon Dec 05 1994 14:425
    
    
    No name given the paper but it did say he was from the Pawtucket Times.
    
    Jerry
9.2830HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Dec 05 1994 15:593
  What did the reporter ask?

  George
9.2832no sympathy for WilsonHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Dec 05 1994 17:5619
re: Stanley Wilson.

I had a chance, thanks to ESPN, to see most of thised interview.

What you have here is the basic bleeding heart liberal type of angle on
how wo is Stanley and what a shame and he couldn't control hisself. A
real boo-hoo kinda tear-jerker.

What I noticed mostly was the complete lack of any type of contrition for
letting down his family, friends and teammates. And the fack that he
seemed to take no responsibility for what he did. Mostly it was a lot of
Stanley talking about Stanley and how the Bengasl woulda won with him,
etc. It seems his big embarrasment in the matter was his worry over what
his son thinks of him.

The final topping on the cake: he wants a chance to comeback and play
in the NFL. After he gets outta jail, that is.

TTom
9.2833Lighten up BillSLICK1::MAILLOUXMon Dec 05 1994 18:0811
    
    
    	I was watching the 5th quarter as well, and I think Mr. Bill
        was totally out of line. A simple no would have sufficed. Also
        he berated Mike Dowling again for asking if he thought Bledsoe
        lost his composer after the interception just be half time. I
        wonder what his wife thought of his statement, that he only
        listenes to his wife sometimes....
    
    
        RM
9.2834HE'S A MEGALOMANIAC!!!STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Tue Dec 06 1994 11:399
      re: last few
    
      I think Bill Parcells sometimes displays megalomaniacal
      tendencies!!  I really do!
    
      He really comes off as pompous.  In his own eyes, a king
      or maybe a god.
    
      Good coach tho.
9.2835bruins and Sox are steadfast; Pats and C's frontrunnersAKOCOA::BREENBut in the land of the One-eyed MenTue Dec 06 1994 20:3710
    The difference between the baseball fans and football fans is that the
    former are there in the good and the bad times.
    
    The Patriots were very hot in the mid-late 70s with the Hannah,Morgan,
    Grogan teams with lots of popular players and sellouts.  Then a
    combination of boring teams (Berry) and losing teams sent 60% off the
    golf courses and ski chalets or wherever.
    
    Meanwhile the Redsox are near capacity despite Hobson, Gorman and
    Haywood.  But the strike may kill that goose.
9.2836PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceTue Dec 06 1994 21:166
    Sorta helps that Fenway's capacity is only 47 people.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
9.2837ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 07 1994 02:412
9.2838yea its a bandboxAD::HEATHCan the Pats duplilcate it???Wed Dec 07 1994 10:225
    
    
    it is actually closer to 33K.
    
    j/
9.2839WMOIS::BALL_KWed Dec 07 1994 11:191
    At 33,000, is it the smallest park in the league ?
9.2840CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Wed Dec 07 1994 11:494
>    At 33,000, is it the smallest park in the league ?

I think it's approximately 34.5K.....

9.2841HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 07 1994 12:3625
RE   <<< Note 9.2835 by AKOCOA::BREEN "But in the land of the One-eyed Men" >>>

>    The difference between the baseball fans and football fans is that the
>    former are there in the good and the bad times.
>    
>    The Patriots were very hot in the mid-late 70s with the Hannah,Morgan,
>    Grogan teams with lots of popular players and sellouts.  Then a
>    combination of boring teams (Berry) and losing teams sent 60% off the
>    golf courses and ski chalets or wherever.
    
  Well it depends, is this just a Boston area phenomena or have you seen it
elsewhere? 

  In Boston I don't believe that the Patriots are a good example of a team
with fair weather fan support. In the past, many fans in the New England area
hated the Patriots even when they were winning.

  The problem in the past was the management and their stile of conducting
business. Both the Sullivans and Victor Kiam were egotistical scum that were
always out to screw someone, hardly anyone who's team you could love.

  This new owner, coach, and team are something else entirely. I can be a fan
of this team regardless if they win or lose.

  George
9.2842Kind of an incentive program to interst you in the productTNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Wed Dec 07 1994 12:563
    Which local bordello is offering the free samples?
    
    NAZZ
9.2844CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendWed Dec 07 1994 13:156
>     playing in Fenway in August is much easier to bear than a stanky Patriots
>     team in Foxboro in December.

Especially with those metal seats!
    

9.2845Yes, Pittsburgh is a good example of the other kindAKOCOA::BREENBut in the land of the One-eyed MenWed Dec 07 1994 18:266
    George, I think you're referring to the malaise of the 80s.  In the 70s
    the Pats were very popular and the crowds were similar in volume and
    enthusiasm to today.
    
    And yes in some towns the football team gets the all-weather fans.  I
    was referring to the situation in Boston up to last year.
9.2846HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 07 1994 18:3522
RE   <<< Note 9.2845 by AKOCOA::BREEN "But in the land of the One-eyed Men" >>>

>    George, I think you're referring to the malaise of the 80s.  In the 70s
>    the Pats were very popular and the crowds were similar in volume and
>    enthusiasm to today.
    
  Maybe they drew good crowds but I remember there being a lot of people back
in the '70s that hated the Pats, particularly out in the western part of
Massachusetts where I was living at the time. 

  It wasn't because of winning or losing, it was just that the Sullivans
somehow managed to piss people off so much that they couldn't identify with the
team. 

  A bunch of us took to liking Miami instead and became fans just before they
got really good. It was fun being a Dolphins fan during their undefeated
season. 

  As for the Red Sox, they went through some pretty lean years when they were
losing. Back in the late 50's and early 60's there were plenty of empty seats. 

  George
9.2847TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinWed Dec 07 1994 19:5923
    
    
>  Maybe they drew good crowds but I remember there being a lot of people back
>in the '70s that hated the Pats, particularly out in the western part of
>Massachusetts where I was living at the time. 
    
    
    	Western Mass is not a very good place to benchmark enthusiasm for
    any Boston sports teams (or for the city of Boston in general). I have
    friends who live in Pittsfield, and find that they are so far and
    isolated from Boston, that they'ld just as soon become part of Vermont
    or NY.
    
    	Many of the people I've met out there are fans of the NYC based
    franchises, regardless of how the Boston teams are faring...
    
    	The Pats of the late 70's were a big deal in the eastern 2/3rds of
    the state...
    
    JimH
    
    
    
9.2848otherwise known as the Jay Mollo factorCNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldWed Dec 07 1994 20:085
 I remember going to a Celtics/Lakers game out at the Springfield Civic 
 Center years ago and there were as many Laker fans as C's....

 mike
9.2849Hicksville MassCSLALL::BRULEgo ahead with your own life leave me aloneThu Dec 08 1994 12:4910
    I'm from Western Mass (North Adams to be exact) and the people out
    there have quite a few options. Most people get TV stations from
    Hartford, Boston, Albany and some NYC. I remember in my neighborhood
    some kids rooted for the Red Sox, some the Yankees, some the Mets and
    quite a few were O's fans. (Mark Belanger was a big reason for that)
    Giants and Pats were the big football teams. The loyalty to the local
    (Boston) teams was not nearly as strong as it is in Eastern Mass.
    
    Mike
    
9.2850SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensThu Dec 08 1994 14:136
    
    I, too, grew up in Wesatern Mass.  I don't think the Pats were that
    popular because there were still a lot of old time Giants fans around,
    and the PAts never gave anyone a reason to jump ship.
    
    brews 
9.2851HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Dec 08 1994 14:2410
  That may well be. We were big Giants fans back in the Y.A. Tittle and Frank
Gifford day. 

  But with regard to baseball, we were solid Red Sox fans. There were a very
few Yankee fans around but they were generally outnumbered 10-1. 

  This was the Northampton/Amherst area in the Connecticut River valley north of
Springfield. 

  George 
9.2852WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountThu Dec 08 1994 15:129
    
    
    
        Well I grew up in Western Mass and I realized that the Sox had 
    dumbfu#2ed ownership and dumbfu#4ed players so I went to a Yankee game
    once and the rest as they say is HIStoryyyyyyyy....
    
    
    Chap
9.2853DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaThu Dec 08 1994 15:396
    	Back in the early to mid 70's going to Foxboro was not just
    a football game, it was an adventure.  The crowds made the Thunderdome
    folks look tame by comparison.  Sigh, I miss those good old days,
    especially now when the Foxboro parking lots look like a BMW dealer.
    
    				  /Don
9.2854hide the wimmin and childrenFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Dec 08 1994 17:032
    yeah, that is the reason why Monday Night Football banned them and Dad
    would never take me to a game there.
9.2855MSBCS::GALVINR.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625Fri Dec 09 1994 11:117
    Mike,
    
    I think it was the town of Foxboro that banned the Pat's from monday
    night games, not Monday Night Football themselves.  I was at a MNF game
    in 1976, vs the Jesters.  Barely escaped with all limbs intact.
    
    RTG
9.2858USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Dec 12 1994 16:152
Anyone know what's going on with the AMERICAN_FOOTBALL conference ?
Haven't been able to get in all day.
9.2859Just the SKILL POSITIONSWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountTue Dec 13 1994 15:0018
    
    
    
        They are picking the Pro_bowl squad Tursday I believe.
    
    
      Heres Mine   AFC
    
         QB  Marino         
         QB  Kelly
         RB  Faulk
         RB  Means
         RB  Thomas
         WR  T Brown
         WR  I Fryar
         WR  A Reed
         TE  Coates
         TE  Glover
9.2860NO WAY!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Dec 13 1994 15:046
    
    	Can't see how you can put Thomas in there...my pick would have to
    be Hoard of the CLEVELAND BROWNS!!!
    
    
    	WOOF!
9.2861Leroy Hoard!HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 13 1994 15:080
9.2863PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Dec 13 1994 15:213
  The defensive side is easy, just pick the starters that wear Black n Gold.

	Keith
9.2864SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Dec 13 1994 15:237
    
    	Come on man.......not giving much credit to the DAWGS....Got to
    put Langham in there....Rookie of the Year!
    
    	Warren should also be there.  Faulk should not go at all!
    
    	WOOF!
9.2865PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Dec 13 1994 15:307
>    	Come on man.......not giving much credit to the DAWGS....Got to
>    put Langham in there....Rookie of the Year!
    
  OK, your howling makes some sense here. The All-Pro defensive team should be
  made up of 10 Steelers and 1 token Dawg. I'll admit, Langham looks great.

	Keith
9.2866SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Dec 13 1994 15:348
    
    	and your going to have to put Turner on there too.  Just for the 
    great stop in Dallas but he's done lots more than that for the DAWGS.
    Could be the best tandem in the league.  Brings back memories of the 
    mid 80's.......
    
    
    	WOOF!
9.28672 WORDS FOR YAWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountTue Dec 13 1994 16:203
    
    
      TERRY MCDANIEL
9.2868GO PACK!!STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Tue Dec 13 1994 16:393
      Joe, I just got in American Football five minutes ago.
    
      Made my Packer entry!!
9.2869PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceTue Dec 13 1994 18:369
    Hey HAL, what "great stop in Dallas" are you talking about, the lasted
    play of the game????
    
    If so, get yer haid out of yer a$$ and watch the tapes of the game, if
    Novacek doesn't S L I P and fall, the 'Spots would be 9-5 right now. 
    All Turner had to do was touch Novacek.
    
    JaKe
    
9.2870ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 19:5612
9.2871SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRINDIANS CAVS BROWNSTue Dec 13 1994 21:0517
    
    Yea.....what he said..........!!!!!
    
    
    	CLEVELAND
    		CLEVELAND
    			CLEVELAND
    				CLEVELAND
    		BROWNS	
    			BROWNS	
    				BROWNS
    
    		
    
    
    WOOF!
    
9.2872ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 21:094
9.2873ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 21:104
9.2874ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 21:104
9.2875ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Dec 13 1994 21:104
9.2876FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 13 1994 21:212
    If Clevelanders had brains, the city wouldn't be the excrement capital
    of the world.
9.2877FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 13 1994 21:212
    If Clevelanders had eyes that worked, they would marry women from out
    of town.
9.2878PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceWed Dec 14 1994 00:2411
    If a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass every time he jumped.
    
    If yer uncle had t_ts, you'd call him "Aunt", or Bernice.
    
    If a plane full of Dr. Scholl's Odor Eaters crashed in Clevescum, the
    city would almost dissappear.
    
    STEELERS will prevail Sunday
    
    JaKe
    
9.2879Quit spreading misinfo, Groaner! ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 14 1994 12:289
    
>    If each opponents TD were worth 50, the Steelers would be 0-14.
    
    The opponents haven't scored a TD on the Steelers in four games this
    year...
    
    
    glenn
    
9.2880Good 'Ol Gary, IndianaSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Wed Dec 14 1994 15:055
      Whoever thinks Cleveland is the pits has not been to 
      Gary, Indiana!!  You can drive for what seems like hours
      through Chicago and suddenly shriek, "WHAT'S THAT SMELL??!"
    
      Answer: We just crossed into Gary!
9.2881MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 14 1994 15:216
    re: .2880
    
    talk about a left-handed compliment. ha!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2882Just humming an old tuneAKOCOA::BREENCome Monday...Wed Dec 14 1994 15:233
    I take it's not the place I want to be.
    
    And Met, left-handed compliments are compliments indeed;
9.2883CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendWed Dec 14 1994 15:411
Gary, Indiana, Gary Indiana, Gary Indiana.....
9.2884ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 15:5113
9.2885MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 14 1994 15:567
    re: .2884
    
    which is why when people from Cleveland drive anywhere else they are a
    road hazard.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2886ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 15:584
9.2887ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsWed Dec 14 1994 16:0815
    
>    See, in Cleveland people understand and obey the rules of the road.
>    In Mass, people have no clue.  Ever drive through the rotary in Hudson,
>    MA.  People in the rotary have the right of way.  Signs are posted.
>    People still have no clue.  Maybe the problem is, people in the state
>    of Mass can't read. 
    
    You know, the scary thing is that I've regularly seen cops there
    _ignoring_ the idiots who plow into the rotary as if they have the
    right of way.
    
    Now, there are certainly some things I like about Massachusetts, but
    give me Ohio drivers any day...
    
    Joe
9.2888ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 16:2026
9.2890ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 16:412
9.2891self-incriminatingSALEM::DODAStop global whiningWed Dec 14 1994 16:433
Yeah, but what state are you sittin' in right now?

daryll
9.2892ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 16:512
9.2893Since when?SALEM::DODAStop global whiningWed Dec 14 1994 16:581
9.2894ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 17:025
9.2896ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 17:104
9.2897PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceWed Dec 14 1994 17:1623
    
    >> Perhaps you should move back to Cleveland and get a job with 
    >> the company that manufactures those lovely dog masks that you
    >> folks wear so as not to make the female Clevelanders quite so 
    >> aware of your unattractiveness.
    
    Tommy, Tommy,Tommy,
    How many times do I have to say it....THEM ARE NOT MASKS!!!!!!!!
    
    Them are the mutant results of years of breeding between the people
    that live in the area of Ohio called Cleveland, and the intake of the
    large toxic levels in that area, which is also the world's largest
    inhabited raw sewage adn toxic waste dump.
    
    Groaner, I've been to Clevescum, and once in a lifetime is one too many
    times.
    
    I used to service some machines in the Post Office
    warehouse(whorehouse??) that was a stone er two's throw from Lake Erie
    and the sludgepound that younzes call a stadium.  Unless they nuked the
    place and started over, it has no hope of ever being decent.  
    
    JaKe
9.2898BIGQ::MCKAYWed Dec 14 1994 17:379
    Just in case you missed it.
    
    Deion intercepts a pass and runs one back 90 yards for a TD Sunday
    and then goes into his little dance.  One announcer says "this guy
    should play offense, be a return man anything to get the ball because
    every time he touches it he's scores"  The other announcer agrees
    and says "I bet Deion has never been IT his whole life".........
    
    Jimbo
9.2899FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Dec 14 1994 17:381
    do you mean IT like in tag or hide&seek?
9.2900NFL SNARFFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Dec 14 1994 17:381
    
9.2901BIGQ::MCKAYWed Dec 14 1994 17:551
    yes
9.2902OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATWed Dec 14 1994 18:017
    
    I myself would like to see someone clean his clock after that little dance
    he does. That crap has no place in the game. I think they should a
    outlaw all that BS. everything from  "In your face to Goal post dunks"
    should draw unsportsmanlike conduct flag along with a nice fat fine.
    
     
9.2903MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 14 1994 18:034
    why give a hoot about a dance or dunk?
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2904It has no place in the gameOLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATWed Dec 14 1994 18:081
    
9.2905OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATWed Dec 14 1994 18:092
    
    It's all so some jive a*8 mf can show off. okay!!
9.2906ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Dec 14 1994 18:104
9.2907I think I did!!OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATWed Dec 14 1994 18:111
    
9.2908GENRAL::WADEWed Dec 14 1994 18:135
    
    	Cadzilla is just jealous cause he can't dance like Deion.
    	I think it's called strut envy.
    
    Claybone
9.2909OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATWed Dec 14 1994 18:196
    
    
    Clayboy,
    
      I don't care if you call it wahtusi, boogaloo, or a fox trot it still
    bs
9.2910FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Dec 14 1994 18:201
    wait til he does that against the 'Girls, then he'll really get mad!
9.2911CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Dec 14 1994 18:2112
I agree with Cad in that I find the "in your face" stuff
annoying.  I disagree that it should be outlawed, however.
Instead, they should not call penalties when players 
retaliate.

Cain't you just see it now - Dion goes into his dance, 
and some big-butt lineman walks up and "boff", decks 
Dion with a forearm shiver.

What fun.

=Bob=
9.2912PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceWed Dec 14 1994 18:254
    It only shows that Deion is a egotistical, no-brained show-off.
    
    JaKe
    
9.2913CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldWed Dec 14 1994 18:306
 I agree with Cad. Someone should clean his clock but good. Not because of
 his dance routine but becuase he picks a fight with Andre Rison who's 
 about a half foot and 40 pounds smaller. Real tough guy that Dieon.

 mike
9.2914HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 14 1994 18:349
  There's already a system in place for stopping post touchdown dances. It's
called the tackle.

  When a team stops Dion from going into the endzone, he doesn't have anything
to dance about. If they are sloppy and let him in the endzone then they deserve
what they get.

  George
9.2915I objected to "Goldie" Richards but where'd it ever get me?EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 14 1994 18:366
    Yeah, what's a Cowboys' fan doing complaining about flash and dash?
    It's the very tenet that that pretty-boy franchise was founded on...
    
    glenn
    
9.2916OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATWed Dec 14 1994 18:424
    
    Glenn the mans name was Golden not Goldie. Blame his parents not Tom
    Landry.  Blame a guy name Taylor ( Otis?) of the AFL Chiefs for starting 
    all this jive bs.
9.2917SALEM::DODAStop global whiningWed Dec 14 1994 19:014
Puh-lease. Yeah Deion is a jerk, unless he's in the uniform of 
{insert your favorite team here}.

daryll
9.2918These guys are humans not machinesBSS::MENDEZWed Dec 14 1994 19:028
    Being a 9er fan; I wish that Deion would tone it down some. But every
    team in the NFL has somebody doing a similar routine.  How about the
    semi sack celebration by Greene of Pittsburgh.  I believe that Gant
    has a little celebration that happens on special teams tackles.  I
    know that Shannon Sharpe does a flex routine when he scores on a
    touchdown pass.  The celebration may bite the 9ers in the butt some
    day.  You never know when it will fire up an opponent.
    
9.2919Keep The Refs Outta ItSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Wed Dec 14 1994 19:1513
      I personally wouldn't dance around if I was fortunate enough
      to be in a position like Deion.
    
      My feeling though is that its wimpy to want the refs to suppress
      Deion's antics.  Let the team do it by preventing him from getting
      into the endzone and by completing passes in his coverage, etc.
    
      What a wimpout to cry to the refs!!!
    
      Just play the game and make your own statements on the field without
      reliance on the refs.
    
                                                  Tony
9.2920OLD1S::CADZILLA2We be the Tools BATWed Dec 14 1994 19:305
    
    I agree it's not up to the ref's, it should be the league that puts a
    stop to the nonsense. I don't mean just Deion's but all of it. What
    started with the spike has turned into a "oh look at me I made a play"
    The players are paid to make the plays, not to dance on the gridiron.
9.2921HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 14 1994 19:3621
RE              <<< Note 9.2919 by STRATA::BARBIERI "God cares." >>>

>      My feeling though is that its wimpy to want the refs to suppress
>      Deion's antics.  Let the team do it by preventing him from getting
>      into the endzone and by completing passes in his coverage, etc.
    
  Exactly! Well said.

  Same for guys who dance after decking the quarterback. There's a method for
stopping that as well called blocking. 

  It's all a matter of basic fundamentals. "If you block and tackle you will
win and in this league winning is everything" -V.L. 

  I suppose the modern corollary is "we don't want to get our uniforms dirty by
blocking and tackling, please make a rule to stop the other team from
celebrating when we screw up". 

  And you guys laugh at me because I like figure skating.

  George
9.2922PTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceWed Dec 14 1994 22:5115
    
    
    >>								What
    >>started with the spike has turned into a "oh look at me I made a play"
    >>The players are paid to make the plays, not to dance on the gridiron.
      
    Actually, all the dorky dancing around started with Elmo Wright's TD
    celebration 20 or so years ago.
    
    I never could stand any of the stupid "dancing" around after
    TD's/sacks/tackles/flatulence.
    
    JaKe
    
    
9.2923NFL NOTESWMOIS::BUCKLEY_MThu Dec 15 1994 13:398
    	ESPN reported last night that Deion "Prime-Time" Sanders is
    	trying to recruit former teammate & sparing partner Andre 
    	Rison to the 49ers next year!  
    
    	New England will be sending the following players to the Pro-Bowl:
    			TE   Ben Coates
    			OT   Bruce Armstrong
    			QB   Drew Bledsoe 
9.2924ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 15 1994 14:153
9.2925BIGQ::MCKAYThu Dec 15 1994 14:193
    voted by the players and coaches!
    
    Jimbo
9.2926The "Undertaker" deserves Pro-Bowl HonorsWMOIS::BUCKLEY_MThu Dec 15 1994 14:243
    	Once again Linebacker & defensive captain Vincent Brown
    	was left off the team.  I can't wait to see who plays 
    	the inside for the AFC!
9.2927EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Dec 15 1994 14:2910
                                  
>    	Once again Linebacker & defensive captain Vincent Brown
>    	was left off the team.  I can't wait to see who plays 
>    	the inside for the AFC!
    
    I dunno.  I've heard murmurings that Vincent Brown is not having even 
    a Vincent Brown-caliber season...
    
    glenn
    
9.2928Not to speak of Maurice HurstAKOCOA::BREENCome Monday...Thu Dec 15 1994 14:301
    
9.2929CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Thu Dec 15 1994 14:3215
| Once again Linebacker & defensive captain Vincent Brown
| was left off the team.  I can't wait to see who plays 
| the inside for the AFC!

It is curious that a team whose defense has played better than
its offense (IMO) is sending only offensive players to the 
Pro Bowl.

I think Brown's problem is that he plays at a position that
is "deep" in talent.  Kinda like Mo Vaughn with the Red
Sox - he may be the best player on the team, but there are
people at the same position in the league who are ahead
of him.

=Bob=
9.2931IF someone can't go he'll be there/ I haven't seen the teamAD::HEATHCan the Pats duplilcate it???Thu Dec 15 1994 14:377
    
    
      Have to agree about Brown.  If Seau's injuries where serious he'd
    have been there.  With Cox moving from outside to inside down in Miami
    it was purely a numbers game.
    
    Jerry
9.2932ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 15 1994 14:413
9.2933ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 15 1994 14:4138
9.2934ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 15 1994 14:4322
9.2935CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendThu Dec 15 1994 14:4612
I'm not surprised that the QBs lead the fumble leaders.  They handle
the ball more than anyone else.

I'll bet a lot of those are of the fumbled snap variety.


With the prevalence of the d-line using that chop that LT used so successfully
to try and strip the ball on the pass play, it'd be interesting to see
stats from say, 15 or 20 years ago, to see how they compare today....


'Saw
9.2936ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 15 1994 14:5172
9.2937MKFSA::LONGI miss Billy the kidThu Dec 15 1994 17:104
    Could someone please post all of the Pro Bowl selections.
    
    
    billl
9.2938ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Dec 15 1994 17:114
9.2940careful, your maturity is showingFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Dec 15 1994 17:381
    
9.2942yPTOS02::JACOBRRed Dust and Spanish LaceThu Dec 15 1994 22:0733
    
                           -- Offense --            -- Defense --
                       Total  Rushing  Passing  Total  Rushing  Passing
    
    Arizona             27      20       23       3       7        6
    Atlanta              8      28        4      28      16       27
    Buffalo              9       7       12      16       8       24
    Chicago             23      16       20      13      27        4
    Cincinnati          18      19       14      12      22        7
    Cleveland           21      11       21       8      12        8
    Dallas               6       5       10       2      11        3
    Denver               7      21        7      27      20       26
    Detroit             13       2       22      22      23       13
    Green Bay           11      22        9       6       4       14
    Houston             26      15       25      10      28        2
    Indianapolis        25       4       28      23      15       22
    Kansas City          5      14        6      14      18       11
    LA Raiders          19      18       19       7       5       15
    LA Rams             22      24       15      18      13       20
    Miami                1      12        1      24       6       28
    Minnesota            3      17        3       5       1       23
    NY Giants           28      10       26      15      21       12
    NY Jets             16      13       18      17      14       17
    New England          4      27        2      19      17       18
    New Orleans         12      26        8      26      19       25
    Philadelphia        10       8       13       4      10        5
    Pittsburgh          15       1       24       1       9        1
    San Diego           14       9       16      11       3       21
    San Francisco        2       6        5       9       2       16
    Seattle             24       3       27      21      24       10
    Tampa Bay           20      23       17      20      25        9
    Washington          17      25       11      25      26       19
    
9.2943BIGQ::MCKAYFri Dec 16 1994 09:417
    Arguments on pro bowl skill players
    
    Mathis should be on instead of Irvin.
    Watters instead of Bettis.
    Jeff George instead of Aikman.
    
    Jimbo
9.2944A Case for Brett FavreLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Dec 16 1994 11:1913
      re: -1
    
      Check out Brett Favre's numbers.  #2 ranked QB in entire NFL
      on a team with little or no running game.  Last six games 18 
      TD's verses (I think) 5 int's.  Against top defense and top 
      passing defense at the time (Dallas), throws 4 TD's while team
      manages ~30 yards rushing all game.
    
      BUT, in clutch situations, hasn't always come through.
    
      There is a case for him though.
    
                                                  Tony
9.2945Farve and George, two faux starsCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Dec 16 1994 12:4217
|    BUT, in clutch situations, hasn't always come through.
 
Now THERE'S an understatement.  

Even as a Packers fan, I can say this.

I agree that the Packers' running game is nothing to 
speak of, but Brett Farve being rated as the #2 QB is
clearly a statistical aboration.  Farve is better than
he was lasted year, but he still makes among the worst
decisions in the league.

The other anomily is Jeff George.  He is getting good 
protection thised year, but he still makes Tony Eason
look like Joe Kapp (toughness wise that is).

=Bob=
9.2946a jokeUSCTR1::GARBARINOFri Dec 16 1994 13:266
>    	New England will be sending the following players to the Pro-Bowl:
>    			QB   Drew Bledsoe 

Amazing.  Just goes to show you that YARDS has a stronger influence than
the other QB categories.  Bledsoe has a 57% completion ratio, and is -5
in td/int, contributing to his 70.3 QB rating (near the bottom of the AFC).
9.2947CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldFri Dec 16 1994 13:326
 actually Joe, I think it has to with who sells the most merchandise. Judging
 by the number of #11 Patriots Jerseys you see around the area, Bledsoe is a
 pro-bowl caliber merchandiser.......

 mike
9.2948Plus he's already doing McDonalds' commercialsCNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldFri Dec 16 1994 13:330
9.2949MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Dec 16 1994 13:3314
 >> Amazing.  Just goes to show you that YARDS has a stronger influence 
 >> than the other QB categories.  Bledsoe has a 57% completion ratio, 
 >> and is -5 in td/int, contributing to his 70.3 QB rating (near the 
 >> bottom of the AFC).

    I think you have to take into account his supporting cast or lack 
    thereof, the fact that he's had to throw so much and that there just 
    aren't that many great QBS in the AFC. Players were saying as early as
    the first two games this year that Bledsoe was special and they ob-
    viously voted that way. It would have been a huge joke if he had been
    voted the starter but third string? That's about right. Who would
    you have voted ahead of him? 
    
9.2950USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Dec 16 1994 13:403
>    Who would you have voted ahead of him? 

Jim Kelly (63.6%, 3100+ yds, +5).
9.2951MIMS::ROLLINS_RFri Dec 16 1994 13:401
	But Kelly's out for the season.
9.2952MIMS::ROLLINS_RFri Dec 16 1994 13:411
	Does anyone have the full listing of Pro Bowl selections ?
9.2953TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Dec 16 1994 13:53120
    
    
    >	Does anyone have the full listing of Pro Bowl selections ?
    
    x == Starter...
    
    National Football Conference
    ============================
    Offense
    -------
    Wide Receivers -- x-Jerry Rice, San Francisco; x-Cris Carter,
    Minnesota; Sterling Sharpe, Green Bay; Michael Irvin, Dallas.
    
    Tackles -- x-William Roaf, New Orleans; x-Lomas Brown, Detroit; Mark
    Tuinei, Dallas.
    
    Guards -- x-Nate Newton, Dallas; x-Randall McDaniel, Minnesota; Jesse
    Sapolu, San Francisco.
    
    Centers -- x-Mark Stepnoski, Dallas; Bart Oates, San Francisco.
    
    Tight Ends -- x-Brent Jones, San Francisco; Jay Novacek, Dallas.
    
    Quarterbacks -- x-Steve Young, San Francisco; Troy Aikman, Dallas,
    Warren Moon, Minnesota.
    
    Running Backs -- x-Emmitt Smith, Dallas; x-Barry Sanders, Detroit;
    Jerome Bettis, Los Angeles Rams.
    
    Fullback -- Daryl Johnston, Dallas.
    
    Defense
    -------
    
    Ends -- x-Reggie White, Green Bay; x-Charles Haley, Dallas; William
    Fuller, Philadelphia.
    
    Interior Linemen -- x-John Randle, Minnesota; x-Leon Lett, Dallas; Dana
    Stubblefield, San Francisco.
    
    Outside Linebackers -- x-Ken Harvey, Washington; x-Bryce Paup, Green
    Bay; Seth Joyner, Arizona.
    
    Inside Linebackers -- x-Chris Spielman, Detroit; Jessie Tuggle,
    Atlanta.
    
    Cornerbacks -- x-Deion Sanders, San Francisco; x-Aeneas Williams,
    Arizona; Eric Allen, Philadelphia.
    
    Safeties -- x-Darren Woodson, Dallas; x-Merton Hanks, San Francisco;
    Tim McDonald, San Francisco.
    
    Specialists
    
    Punter -- Reggie Roby, Washington.
    
    Kicker -- Fuad Reveiz, Minnesota.
    
    Kick Return Specialist -- Mel Gray, Detroit.
    
    Special Teamer -- Elbert Shelley, Atlanta.
    
    American Football Conference
    ============================
    Offense
    -------
    
    Wide Receivers -- x-Tim Brown, Los Angeles Raiders; x-Andre Reed,
    Buffalo; Irving Fryar, Miami; Rob Moore, New York Jets.
    
    Tackles -- x-Richmond Webb, Miami; x-Bruce Armstrong, New England; Gary
    Zimmerman, Denver.
    
    Guards -- x-Keith Sims, Miami; x-Steve Wisniewski, Los Angeles Raiders;
    Duval Love, Pittsburgh.
    
    Centers -- x-Dermontti Dawson, Pittsburgh; Bruce Matthews, Houston.
    
    Tight Ends -- x-Ben Coates, New England; Shannon Sharpe, Denver.
    
    Quarterbacks -- x-Dan Marino, Miami; John Elway, Denver; Drew Bledsoe,
    New England.
    
    Running Backs -- x-Marshall Faulk, Indianapolis; x-Natrone Means, San
    Diego; Chris Warren, Seattle.
    
    Fullback -- Leroy Hoard, Cleveland.
    
    Defense
    -------
    
    Ends -- x-Bruce Smith, Buffalo; x-Leslie O'Neal, San Diego; Neil Smith,
    Kansas City.
    
    Interior Linemen -- x-Michael Dean Perry, Cleveland; x-Cortez Kennedy,
    Seattle; Chester McGlockton, Los Angeles Raiders.
    
    Outside Linebackers -- x-Derrick Thomas, Kansas City; x-Greg Lloyd,
    Pittsburgh; Kevin Greene, Pittsburgh.
    
    Inside Linebackers -- x-Junior Seau, San Diego; Bryan Cox, Miami.
    
    Cornerbacks -- x-Rod Woodson, Pittsburgh; x-Terry McDaniel, Los Angeles
    Raiders; Dale Carter, Kansas City.
    
    Strong Safety -- x-Carnell Lake, Pittsburgh; Steve Atwater, Denver.
    
    Free Safety -- x-Eric Turner, Cleveland.
    
    Specialists
    
    Punter -- Rick Tuten, Seattle.
    
    Kicker -- John Carney, San Diego.
    
    Kick Return Specialist -- Eric Metcalf, Cleveland.
    
    Special Teamer -- Steve Tasker, Buffalo.
    
    
9.2954HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Dec 16 1994 13:5912
  If this was a vote then I'm surprised Jim Kelly didn't get selected despite
his injury. 

  In baseball people vote for who they like then the coach of the all-star team
makes the necessary replacements. 

  Despite being a Bledsoe fan, I feel that Kelly deserves the honor of the
vote. Bledsoe is fine as a replacement. 

  Of course Bledsoe did have the record breaking game ...

  George 
9.2955SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Fri Dec 16 1994 14:398
    
    	Does the QB rating system calculate the following. Something
    in the effect of Pass attempts/Interception ratio? If player X
    throws the ball 250 times and threw 13 interceptions. Then you have
    a Bledsoe who threw 500 times and 26 interceptions. If you calculate
    player X out to 500 attempts you would also get 26 INT's.
    
    Ron
9.2956lies, damn lies, statisticsHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 16 1994 14:4414
From what I understand, a lot of the stats behind the QB rating are based
on what happens in terms of number of attempts: TDs, interceptions,
average yardage, etc.

The highest rated QB may or may not be the best. In some years, it looks
like it follows, like this year where Steve Young seems to be leading at
least the NFC. However, some stats like how many games won, are not part
of this.

I guess when you caint prove your case about who's best, you can bring
out a bunch of statistics to confuse the issue. QB ratings cerainly fall
into this category.

TTom
9.2957NFL QB rating system may be worse than Heiser's PG rating...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Dec 16 1994 14:5318
    
    Bledsoe's QB rating is much more bogus than his Pro Bowl selection for 
    the following reasons: a) the formula overrates completion percentage by
    effectively double-counting it by also using yards per attempt instead 
    of yards per completion, b) the formula strictly measures overall
    "efficiency" without regard to number of attempts.  It stands to reason 
    that a QB will be more efficient the _less_ he has to throw if he can
    pick his spots behind a good running game.  Without a doubt Bledsoe is 
    in the worst situation possible in the entire NFL as far as "efficiency"
    goes.
    
    Somehow someway Marshall Faulk was given a starting RB spot.  Maybe has
    something to do with the fact that he leads the AFC in total offense...
     ;-)
    
    glenn
     
        
9.2958OLD1S::CADZILLA2IDRINKALONEWITHMYBUDDYJACKDANIELSFri Dec 16 1994 14:5616
    
    Qb's are rated on the following stat's
    
    
    Attempts
    Compeltions
    Pct Comp
    Total Yards
    Ave yards 
    Td's
    Longest pass comp
    Int's
    
    example
              att  com  %com tot  ave  td long  int  rate
    S. Young  419  292  69.7 3525 8.41 31  69   9    110.9
9.2959MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Dec 16 1994 15:1315
    
    
  >> Somehow someway Marshall Faulk was given a starting RB spot.  Maybe has
  >> something to do with the fact that he leads the AFC in total offense...
     
     Faulk benefitted just as Bledsoe did from injuries to better players
     and a dearth of good players at his position. Contrast and compare
     Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith and Jerome Bettis to Natrone Means, Marshall 
     Faulk and Chris Warren. After all of the hype about Marshall from folks
     who really hadn't seen enough of him to form and opinion, the actual
     product has produced a meager three 100+ yard rushing games behind a
     very good offensive line. We didn't here the kind of remarks posted 
     above after Marshall appeared on tv here in New England because he
     was decidedly mediocre. My man Erric Rhett is looking at like a much
     better value draft-wise.
9.2960another vote for RhettHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 16 1994 15:1813
I've only seen Faulk on clips except for the Pats game. Saying he was
mediocre is being charitable. Mostly, when he was needed to gain some key
yardage he dint.

Faulk also benefitted greatly from some long runs. His average run is
just that, average. And fer sure his team doesn't help his cause.

You gotta like Rhett. Like Faulk, he became the real go to guy. Unlike
Faulk, he delivers consistently. I think Tampa Bay may have found a
formula with Erickson at QB, Dilfer on the Pine and a whole lot of Eric
Rhett.

TTom
9.2961FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Dec 16 1994 15:231
    Too bad I don't have NFL stats online.  I'd settle this debate too.
9.2962Give it up Tommy; he's a player...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Dec 16 1994 15:2520
    
>  My man Erric Rhett is looking at like a much better value draft-wise.
    
    Better value, maybe, to the extent that something like that can be
    qualified.  Better player, no (when it was all said and done Rhett 
    did get his carries, and a 3.6 average to Faulk's 4.0 -- but Faulk 
    just might become the best pass-catching back in the league if he's 
    not already).
    
    The Patriots shut Faulk down, no question about it.  They've been
    shutting everyone down lately, including the other AFC starter Natrone
    Means.  No, neither is in the class of Sanders or Smith (Bettis isn't
    having too good a season though).  The question still remains how a
    player can lead the AFC in offense based on hype, or how that
    performance can be nullified by the performance in two games seen in
    New England (I didn't say a thing when the guy was running roughshod
    over Seattle or Cincinnati in recent weeks, either).
    
    glenn
    
9.2963exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Dec 16 1994 15:4519
      Marshall is a nice back with flashes of speed and he'll
     occasionally break a long one. Worth the number two pick
     in the draft? Maybe in this past one which might go down
     as one of the weakest (if not THE weakest) ever but I see
     exactly what Parcells meant when he was asked if he'd draft
     Faulk at the number 5 spot if Marshall was still there. Bill
     said that the RB spot was always one of the strongest in the
     draft. Someone (you) once said that Drew and Marshall could 
     be the next Troy and Emmitt. Rhett resembles Emmitt more than
     Marshall does. He's a Florida back who was relatively unher-
     alded. He's durable, he follows his blocks well and he *can*
     catch quite well. Why he hasn't been thrown the ball more, I 
     don't know. I haven't been able to see Tampa play this year.
     When all is said and done, he'll match up quite favorably with
     Marshall. He's already matched him in 100+ yard games and his
     192 yard game is the Tampa Bay record and in the top five all 
     time for rookies.
    
9.2964SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensFri Dec 16 1994 15:477
    We had the QB rating formula in some version of Sprots, a while back. 
    It's one man's guess at a way to rate qb's, and the formula has changed
    over the years.  It is not the be all, end all, which was my point in
    regard to Aikman.  Not that Aikman has fallen behind Favre, I assume
    Cad will agree.
    
    brews
9.2965MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Dec 16 1994 15:488
    >> (I didn't say a thing when the guy was running roughshod over 
    >> Seattle or Cincinnati in recent weeks, either).
    
       Why would you? They're the number 24 and 22 defenses against the
       run. His other big game came against Houston who is number 28 -
       dead last. To paraphrase TTom, his average performance is pretty
       average.    
    
9.2966OLD1S::CADZILLA2IDRINKALONEWITHMYBUDDYJACKDANIELSFri Dec 16 1994 15:5117
    
    
    
    
    These are the AP stats.
    
    Warren of Seattle leads the AFC in total yards from scrimage with
    1668  1362 rush 306 recieve.
    
    Faulk is second 1623  1136 487 
    
    Means is third  1427  1192 235
    
    Sander is first in NFC with 1919 total  1721 rush 198 recieving
    
    Smith #2 1730  1410  320
    Rhett is 16th in the NFC
9.2967OLD1S::CADZILLA2IDRINKALONEWITHMYBUDDYJACKDANIELSFri Dec 16 1994 15:589
    
    Re Aikman vs Farve.
    
     Until a few weeks ago Troy made very few mistakes. I can't say that
    about Farve yet. He is getting better about not throwing in double and
    triple coverage just to complete a pass to Sharpe. 
    
      I do agree the rating system has it's flaws, but what else dow you
    use. Win/loss record? or the Pro Bowl selection? 
9.2968Jerome Bettis #36WMOIS::BUCKLEY_MFri Dec 16 1994 16:048
    	How many more years does Jerome Bettis have left on his contract
    	in L.A./St.Louis?  Bettis was awesome as a rookie and he chased
    	Emmitt for the rushing title last year and he didn't have the line
    	in front of him like Smith did in Dallas.  I hope for Jerome's
    	sake the Ram's invest some money into there offensive line or he
    	will be lucky to withstand 5 years in the league, even though
    	he has a 5'11 243 lb. frame.   Wouldn't he look nice in a Pat's
    	uniform!
9.2969MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Dec 16 1994 16:073
    
     Bettis who "isn't having to good of a season" has 970 yards
    rushing for a truly stanky team.
9.2970Too few 100-yard games + averageness = 1600+ yards offense?EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Dec 16 1994 16:1744
    Okay, Chris Warren passed Faulk up in total offense last week.  I'd have 
    no problem with him as the AFC starter over Faulk, with Faulk as the
    backup...
    
    Bettis has 900+ yards with a meager 3.3 average.  Faulk has 1100+, a
    4.0 average and catches the ball, yet you're not impressed.  Both play
    for stanky teams, with the Rams being worse but no more dependent on
    offense than the Colts are with Faulk (less actually).  Try and be 
    a little consistent.
    
>     Someone (you) once said that Drew and Marshall could 
>     be the next Troy and Emmitt.
    
    In reference to powerful QB-RB tandems, not based on style.  None of 
    players resemble the other.  Of course the Pats would still need 
    another 6-8 players get anywhere near as much out of their QB-RB as the
    Cowboys do.  And while Parcells may be right about RB depth, he still 
    doesn't have a good one.  Maybe he'll get one in the next RB-deep
    draft, maybe he won't.  Right now it's a major team weakness.  I
    certainly think a Willie McGinest will be more replaceable than a Faulk
    (or probablty even a Rhett for that matter).
    
>       Why would you? They're the number 24 and 22 defenses against the
>       run. His other big game came against Houston who is number 28 -
>       dead last. To paraphrase TTom, his average performance is pretty
>       average.    
    
    Contradictions abound.  You don't like the low number of 100+ yard plus
    games, yet when you add up the total numbers (and the 4.0 rushing average) 
    they're near the top of the league.  That's consistency, not the lack
    of.  Take out the three games (even though plenty of other backs have
    gotten to play these teams), and you're still talking about 1100+
    yards of total offense in the other 11 games.  You don't add up these
    "average" performances and come up with a guy at the top.  That makes 
    no sense.  Pick one or the other (spectacular games or consistency),
    not both.
    
    And, regardless of what I've seen or said, I still didn't have a thing 
    to do with putting the guy in as the Pro Bowl starter in his rookie 
    season...
    
    glenn
    
9.2971He's only a kidSLICK1::MAILLOUXFri Dec 16 1994 16:2316
    
    
    
    	I don't think injuries had anything to do with Bledsoe being
        choosen to the Pro Bowl. The kid deserved it just looked at
        the stats he's produced. Granted the interception's are high,
        but they don't take into consideration the tip balls nor the
        blow pass routes that resulted in the pick-offs. The guy has
        thrown for more yardage then the vaunted Marino, he set an
        NFL record for attempts in a game and he's about to break the
        overall pass attempts for a season, possibly Sunday. Take this
        all into consideration plus the fact he should be playing in
        some college bowl game, the choice was well deserved...
    
    
    	RM
9.2972TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Dec 16 1994 16:2327
    
    
    > Bettis who "isn't having to good of a season" has 970 yards
    >rushing for a truly stanky team.
    
    
    	I'm a little confused about how you determine which running backs
    you like.
    
    	I take it you think Bettis is doing pretty with 970 yards so far,
    on a poor team. But you less than enamoured with Faulk at 1136 yards on
    a team which, IMHO, is in the same category as the Rams? 
    
    	And before anybody compares team records, please be advised that the
    Colts must of had the easiest schedule in the NFL this year. Their
    non-division schedule was Seattle (twice), The NFC Central
    (Houston & Cincy being the easy game of course), Washington, and
    Tampa Bay. The best team Indy has beaten so far this year is
    Buffalo (7-7). Everybody else has a losing record (Seattle-twice,
    Houston, Cincy, and the Jets).
    
    	So why do you (apparently) like Bettis while not liking Faulk. Or
    have a misunderstood your posts?
    
    JimH
    
    
9.2973CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Dec 16 1994 16:2410
    
|    Bettis who "isn't having to good of a season" has 970 yards
|    rushing for a truly stanky team.

I saw the Rams-Chargers game at the Murph in November, and I agree 
that the Rams are pretty poor on the front lines.  Given that, and 
that it was the only time thised season that I've seen him, Bettis 
looked entirely ordinary against a Charger team on a losing streak.

=Bob=
9.2974I think it's an NFL Marketing Move.USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Dec 16 1994 17:3716
I'm not basing my opinion on the QB rating alone...I just grabbed whatever
evidence was easily available.  To me Bledsoe is a promising QB with a
great future ahead of him, but he wasn't one of the top-3 QBs in the AFC
this year...based on any statistics.

As someone pointed out, his biggest statistical achievement is # of attempts,
and total yards passing.  Why should a QB be chosen just because he has to
throw so much ?  It's what he does with the ball that's most important,
and his completion % and # of interceptions is among the poorest in the AFC.
At first glance, relating # of INTs to pass attempts looks reasonable, but
then you have to acknowledge that he's thrown 26 INTs in 15 games, thereby
giving the ball to the oppostion more times than any other QB in the
conference, and more times than he's put it in the endzone.

Don't get me wrong, he's going to be king-QB in the NFL in the next couple
of years, but IMO he doesn't belong in the Pro Bowl this year.
9.2976MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Dec 16 1994 17:4714
    
    >> So why do you (apparently) like Bettis while not liking Faulk. Or
    >> have a misunderstood your posts?
    
       Jim, I like Faulk. He's a better than average back. But back before
       the draft Glenn professed his undying love for Marshall after a 
       glowing article in the Globe and gave at least me the impression that 
       this guy was the next Barry. My position was that I wouldn't take him 
       especially not that high. My guy was Errict Rhett who was taken 34th. 
       I don't see Marshall being *that* much better than Rhett, if at all.    
       Flashier? Yes and more likely to break off the big one. But the trade-
       off is durability and the ability to break tackles. I'm not convinced
       that Marshall is a better pass catcher than Errict. I saw Rhett play
       in college. The kid has very good hands.
9.2977Like I said, then and now, he's a player...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Dec 16 1994 18:0918
  >> And, regardless of what I've seen or said,
  >
  >   This sounds to me like an admission that what you've seen (three games on
  >   local tv not just the two) has been unimpressive. You're right it has been.
  >   Silly me, I just go by what I see.    
    
    Will all due respect, that's a very limited and very poor method for
    making such a judgment.  There's a wealth of information and analysis
    out there by people (including the Pro Bowl voters) who know a hell of 
    lot more about football than either of us.  The best you can hope for
    is to watch some games and keep up with the rest of it and try to draw
    conclusions.  To just say "nope, I'll go only by what I've personally 
    seen, locally" is shortsighted.  Otherwise, we'd be forever obliged to 
    rely on the Sawmain's personal observations of Big Dan Reeves... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
9.2978Thinking futures...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Dec 16 1994 18:1314
    
>    Our problem isn't the running backs. It's the run blocking. 
    
    I'd say it's both, with there being more room for improvement over this
    season on the O-line with the current personnel.  I think some of the
    more inexperienced players like Todd Rucci are coming around.  On the
    other hand, I don't see either Leroy Thompson or what's left of Marion
    Butts ever being enough to allow this team to be a championship
    contender, unless there's huge improvement in other areas to compensate.
    That's not to say that such a player can't be found, just that he's
    not here now.
    
    glenn
    
9.2979CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendFri Dec 16 1994 18:405
>    seen, locally" is shortsighted.  Otherwise, we'd be forever obliged to 
>    rely on the Sawmain's personal observations of Big Dan Reeves... ;-)
    
But I'm tellin' ya, the guy cain't coach!!!!!!    

9.2980MIMS::ROLLINS_RFri Dec 16 1994 19:0214
>     I merely pointed out that your "not too good of a season" is 970 yards 
>     on a truly bad 4-10 team. Meanwile Faulk has 160 more yards on a 7-7 
>     team with a pretty good offensive line. If there's any inconsistency,
>     it's on your part.

      I've read this twice, and still can't figure out what's so "pretty
      good" about the Colts offensive line.  From what I've seen (admittedly
      bit a great deal), I wouldn't rate this offensive line highly.
      Definately not in the top half of the league; at best only 4th in their
      division.

      Moreover, the Rams haven't been that bad.  They have an awful record,
      but nearly beat Atlanta twice, and have beaten a couple of pretty good
      teams.  Would a 6-8 record make them that much different ?
9.2981Is this right ? Is NO eliminated ?MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Dec 19 1994 12:59138
Here we go.  Minnesota and Detroit have playoff spots all but wrapped up
(they miss out in 1 of 64 cases each.)  Chicago is close (missing out in 2
of 64 cases.)  Green Bay is in control of its own destiny, and could even
go in with a loss.  New York needs help.  Arizona needs serious help.
 
Okay, let's get the easy part out of the way!
 
 
San Francisco
-------------
D1.
 
 
Dallas
------
D2.
 
 
Everybody else:
 
Comments:
 
Ties are officially omitted from the NFC Playoff Picture.  They would blow
my mind even further.
 
New York and Arizona cannot both go to the NFC playoffs.
 
Arizona can possibly get W1; New York can do no better than W3.
 
Minnesota clinches NFC Central with a win; Detroit clinches at least W1 with a
win; Chicago clinches at least W2 with a win; GB clinches at least W3 with a win
 
Minnesota, Detroit, Chicago, and Green Bay all have a chance to win the NFC
Central.
 
Minnesota could host any of Detroit, Chicago, Green Bay, New York, or
Arizona in the first round of the playoffs.
 
Detroit could host any of Minnesota, Chicago, Green Bay, New York, or
Arizona in the first round of the playoffs.
 
Chicago could host any of Minnesota, Detroit, Green Bay, New York, or
Arizona in the first round of the playoffs.
 
Green Bay could host any of Minnesota, Detroit, Chicago, or
Arizona in the first round of the playoffs (but cannot host New York).
 
 
NEW YORK IS IN if they beat Dallas and Green Bay loses to Tampa Bay.
Otherwise, NEW YORK IS OUT.
 
ARIZONA IS IN if they beat Atlanta, New York loses to Dallas, and (Green
bay loses to Tampa Bay or Minnesota loses to San Francisco).  Otherwise,
ARIZONA IS OUT.
 
GREEN BAY IS IN if they beat Tampa Bay, or if (New York loses to Dallas and
Arizona loses to Atlanta.)  Otherwise, GREEN BAY IS OUT.
 
CHICAGO IS OUT if they lose to New England, Minnesota loses to San
Francisco, Green Bay beats Tampa Bay, New York loses to Dallas, and Arizona
beats Atlanta.  Otherwise, CHICAGO IS IN.
 
DETROIT IS OUT if they lose to Miami, Minnesota loses to San Francisco,
Chicago beats New England, Green Bay beats Tampa Bay, New York loses to
Dallas, and Arizona beats Atlanta.  Otherwise, DETROIT IS IN.
 
MINNESOTA IS OUT if they lose to San Francisco, Detroit beats Miami,
Chicago beats New England, Green Bay beats Tampa Bay, New York loses to
Dallas, and Arizona beats Atlanta.  Otherwise, MINNESOTA IS IN.
 
 
Tiebreaker situation:
 
New York beats Arizona (division).
 
Green Bay beats Minnesota beats Detroit beats Chicago (division, essentially).
 
Any NFC Central team beats any NFC East team EXCEPT: Arizona beats Minnesota
on the basis of Arizona's 17-7 victory over Minnesota in week 5.
 
 
First six columns are results of:
San Francisco at Minnesota
Detroit at Miami
New England at Chicago
Green Bay at Tampa Bay
Dallas at New York
Arizona at Atlanta
 
W is a win for the team at the top of the column, L is a loss, * is any
result.
 
Last four columns are:
NFC Central champion (D3)
Wildcards 1-3 (W1, W2, W3)
 
 
Mi De Ch GB NY Ar  D3 W1 W2 W3
 W  W  W  W  *  *  Mi De Ch GB
 W  W  W  L  W  *  Mi De Ch NY
 W  W  W  L  L  W  Mi De Ch Ar
 W  W  W  L  L  L  Mi De Ch GB
 W  W  L  W  *  *  Mi De GB Ch
 W  W  L  L  W  *  Mi De Ch NY
 W  W  L  L  L  W  Mi De Ch Ar
 W  W  L  L  L  L  Mi De Ch GB
 W  L  W  W  *  *  Mi Ch GB De
 W  L  W  L  W  *  Mi Ch De NY
 W  L  W  L  L  W  Mi Ch De Ar
 W  L  W  L  L  L  Mi Ch De GB
 W  L  L  W  *  *  Mi GB De Ch
 W  L  L  L  W  *  Mi De Ch NY
 W  L  L  L  L  W  Mi De Ch Ar
 W  L  L  L  L  L  Mi De Ch GB
 L  W  W  W  W  *  De Ch GB Mi
 L  W  W  W  L  W  De Ch GB Ar
 L  W  W  W  L  L  De Ch GB Mi
 L  W  W  L  W  *  De Ch Mi NY
 L  W  W  L  L  W  De Ch Ar Mi
 L  W  W  L  L  L  De Ch Mi GB
 L  W  L  W  W  *  De GB Mi Ch
 L  W  L  W  L  W  De GB Ar Mi
 L  W  L  W  L  L  De GB Mi Ch
 L  W  L  L  W  *  De Mi Ch NY
 L  W  L  L  L  W  De Ar Mi Ch
 L  W  L  L  L  L  De Mi Ch GB
 L  L  W  W  W  *  Ch GB Mi De
 L  L  W  W  L  W  Ch GB Ar Mi
 L  L  W  W  L  L  Ch GB Mi De
 L  L  W  L  W  *  Ch Mi De NY
 L  L  W  L  L  W  Ch Ar Mi De
 L  L  W  L  L  L  Ch Mi De GB
 L  L  L  W  W  *  GB Mi De Ch
 L  L  L  W  L  W  GB Ar Mi De
 L  L  L  W  L  L  GB Mi De Ch
 L  L  L  L  W  *  Mi De Ch NY
 L  L  L  L  L  W  Mi De Ch Ar
 L  L  L  L  L  L  Mi De Ch GB
9.2982NFC situation simplified a bit (maybe)NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 19 1994 13:4023
    
> Here we go.  Minnesota and Detroit have playoff spots all but wrapped up
> (they miss out in 1 of 64 cases each.)  Chicago is close (missing out in 2
> of 64 cases.) 
    
    The number of combinations doesn't reflect the odds, though.  _If_
    Minnesota loses to SF, any one of Minnesota, Detroit, and Chicago 
    could be out at 9-7 (all play tough games) if Green Bay beats Tampa Bay, 
    New York loses to Dallas, and Phoenix beats Atlanta.  These are all
    reasonable results.  Phoenix would be the team that slips in ahead of 
    an NFC Central team, holding a head-to-head tie-breaker with Minnesota.  
    The Central team that would be out at 9-7 comes from the bottom of the 
    NFC Central tie-breaker stack which at 9-7 would be ordered (from the 
    top) as Green Bay, Minnesota, Detroit, and Chicago.  All of these teams 
    better be thinking about deciding their own fate, especially the Bears.

    The Giants' chances are not looking good at the moment.  If they beat
    Dallas, they need Green Bay to lose to Tampa.  That one "choke" that I
    was predicting nearly came about when Atlanta had Green Bay on the
    ropes, but allowed them to slip free in the final seconds.
    
    glenn
    
9.2983choke of the day: DolphinsHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Dec 19 1994 13:457
The one choke job par excellence yesterday was the Miami Dolphins who
failed to score a TD at the Colts. Highlights of that lack of effort
included a sequence wherein Dan Marino and the Fish had 7 plays inside
the Colts 10 and couldn't put it in the end zone. Indianapolis wins,
10-6!

TTom
9.2984disgustedSALEM::DODAStop global whiningMon Dec 19 1994 15:3811
After that disgusting performance on Saturday, the Vikings do 
not belong in the playoffs, period. They have no running game, 
an average defense and QB who should be thinking about retirement. 

The play calling SUCKS. I doubt they'll beat the Niners even if 
Seifert pulls the starters at halftime.

There is no excuse for losing to a team coached by Fontes and 
QB'd by Dave "You pick the comeback, I'll throw the INT" Krieg.

daryll
9.2985FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Dec 19 1994 16:364
    From the local news, I can tell you that AZ goes if:
    
    - they beat Atlanta
    - both Dallas and San Francisco win
9.2986EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Dec 19 1994 20:249
    
>                    -< Is this right ?  Is NO eliminated ? >-
    
    I don't think they are yet.  They can still win the tie-breaker with
    Green Bay at 8-8.  I'm sure we'll hear about it tonight when Dallas
    stomps them.
    
    glenn

9.2987HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Dec 19 1994 20:265
  Don't forget, this coming weekend most of the NFL games are on Saturday.

  The only game on Sunday (X-mass day) will be the Miami/Detroit game.

  George
9.2988CSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Mon Dec 19 1994 20:457
Chances are good that this year's Super Bowl winner will be the first
5 time champ.  The three top contenders, San Francisco, Dallas and
Pittsburgh all have 4 previous wins.

Just thought I'd mention it.

Jerry
9.2989WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Dec 19 1994 22:4211
    
> Chances are good that this year's Super Bowl winner will be the first
> 5 time champ.  The three top contenders, San Francisco, Dallas and
> Pittsburgh all have 4 previous wins.
    
    But aren't only Pitt and SF undefeated in the Super Bowl?
    
    I always wanted a Pitt/SF Super Bowl ("The Super Bowl King") at 4-0
    each or Denver/Minny ("Somebody Has To Win!") Super Bowl at 0-4 each.
    
    - Sean
9.2990MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Dec 20 1994 02:448
    How about Buffalo/Minny??
    
    There are other teams that are undefeated in ths SB.
    
    Jets,Giants,Green Bay, not sure about others.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.2991CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldTue Dec 20 1994 10:564
 Da Bears......also undefeated....

 other non-winners:  bengals 0-2   eagles 0-1  patriots 0-1   rams 0-1
9.2992MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 20 1994 13:3310
    
    
      BTW - did anyone see the Neon Peon's torreador act when he waved
            the Broncos RB (the smallest RB in the league) into the end 
            zone? It was about a fourth and goal from the five and the
            Bronc's hand off to Iforgethisname and there's Deion between
            him and the end zone. Instead of going for the stop, Deion
            makes a half-hearted grab at the ball and steps out of the 
            way. Touchdown Denver. Deion's hitting ain't going to remind
            anyone in SF of Ronnie Lott.
9.2993CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 20 1994 13:384
re: .2992

Saw that - outrageous.  Sanders can cover anyone in the league, but 
when it comes to hitting, he is the Jeff George of defensive backs.
9.2994CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendTue Dec 20 1994 13:505
>Saw that - outrageous.  Sanders can cover anyone in the league, but 
>when it comes to hitting, he is the Jeff George of defensive backs.


As Hans and Franz would say "he's a little girly-mon!"
9.2995"Best cover man", no doubt, but...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 20 1994 14:107
    
    Deion's shortcomings in the area of tackling was the primary reason 
    cited by more than one analyst when the NFL put Rod Woodson and not 
    him on the all-time team at CB...
    
    glenn
    
9.2996FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingTue Dec 20 1994 14:341
    Nothing like the Bo Jackson - Brian Bosworth collision.
9.3000ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Tue Dec 20 1994 14:592
9.3001playoffs games and possibilitiesHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 20 1994 16:3764
9.3002MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Dec 20 1994 17:1782
9.3003moreHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 20 1994 17:2936
Not sure about the Chiefs part but the other stuff looks about right.

In any case, here's the records in the divisions, the conferences and
overall.

 
MIA    9   6   0  0.0    PIT   12   3   0  0.0    SF    13   2   0  0.0
NE     9   6   0  0.0    CLE   10   5   0  2.0    DAL   12   3   0  1.0
BUF    7   8   0  2.0    SD    10   5   0  2.0    PIT   12   3   0  1.0
IND    7   8   0  2.0    MIA    9   6   0  3.0    SD    10   5   0  3.0
NYJ    6   9   0  3.0    NE     9   6   0  3.0    CLE   10   5   0  3.0
PIT   12   3   0  0.0    LRD    9   6   0  3.0    DET    9   6   0  4.0
CLE   10   5   0  2.0    KC     8   7   0  4.0    CHI    9   6   0  4.0
CIN    2  13   0 10.0    DEN    7   8   0  5.0    LRD    9   6   0  4.0
HOU    1  14   0 11.0    IND    7   8   0  5.0    MIN    9   6   0  4.0
SD    10   5   0  0.0    BUF    7   8   0  5.0    NE     9   6   0  4.0
LRD    9   6   0  1.0    SEA    6   9   0  6.0    MIA    9   6   0  4.0
KC     8   7   0  2.0    NYJ    6   9   0  6.0    NYG    8   7   0  5.0
DEN    7   8   0  3.0    CIN    2  13   0 10.0    ARI    8   7   0  5.0
SEA    6   9   0  4.0    HOU    1  14   0 11.0    GB     8   7   0  5.0
DAL   12   3   0  0.0    SF    13   2   0  0.0    KC     8   7   0  5.0
NYG    8   7   0  4.0    DAL   12   3   0  1.0    PHI    7   8   0  6.0
ARI    8   7   0  4.0    MIN    9   6   0  4.0    BUF    7   8   0  6.0
PHI    7   8   0  5.0    DET    9   6   0  4.0    IND    7   8   0  6.0
WAS    2  13   0 10.0    CHI    9   6   0  4.0    DEN    7   8   0  6.0
MIN    9   6   0  0.0    GB     8   7   0  5.0    NO     6   9   0  7.0
DET    9   6   0  0.0    NYG    8   7   0  5.0    ATL    6   9   0  7.0
CHI    9   6   0  0.0    ARI    8   7   0  5.0    TB     6   9   0  7.0
GB     8   7   0  1.0    PHI    7   8   0  6.0    SEA    6   9   0  7.0
TB     6   9   0  3.0    ATL    6   9   0  7.0    NYJ    6   9   0  7.0
SF    13   2   0  0.0    NO     6   9   0  7.0    LRM    4  11   0  9.0
NO     6   9   0  7.0    TB     6   9   0  7.0    WAS    2  13   0 11.0
ATL    6   9   0  7.0    LRM    4  11   0  9.0    CIN    2  13   0 11.0
LRM    4  11   0  9.0    WAS    2  13   0 11.0    HOU    1  14   0 12.0

TTom
9.3004WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Dec 20 1994 18:387
    
    >     There are other teams that are undefeated in ths SB.
    
    I know that......  I meant only Pitt and SF are undefeated in the
    3 .2988 brought up as possible 5-time champs.
    
    - Sean who replies in context
9.3005and moreHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 20 1994 18:4922
                 W-L-T    Home    Away     AFC     NFC     Div  Next
                -------------------------------------------------------
y-MIAMI          9-6-0   5-2-0   4-4-0   8-4-0   1-2-0   5-3-0  Detroit
NEW ENGLAND      9-6-0   5-3-0   4-3-0   6-6-0   3-0-0   4-4-0  @Chicago

x-PITTSBURGH    12-3-0   7-1-0   5-2-0  10-1-0   2-2-0   6-0-0  @San Diego
y-CLEVELAND     10-5-0   5-2-0   5-3-0   7-4-0   3-1-0   4-2-0  Seattle

x-SAN DIEGO     10-5-0   4-3-0   6-2-0   8-3-0   2-2-0   6-2-0  Pittsburgh
LA RAIDERS       9-6-0   4-3-0   5-3-0   6-5-0   3-1-0   4-3-0  Kansas City
KANSAS CITY      8-7-0   5-3-0   3-4-0   5-6-0   3-1-0   3-4-0  @LA Raiders

x-DALLAS        12-3-0   6-2-0   6-1-0   3-1-0   9-2-0   7-0-0  @NY Giants
NY GIANTS        8-7-0   3-4-0   5-3-0   3-1-0   5-6-0   5-2-0  Dallas
ARIZONA          8-7-0   5-3-0   3-4-0   3-1-0   5-6-0   4-4-0  @Atlanta

MINNESOTA        9-6-0   5-2-0   4-4-0   2-2-0   7-4-0   5-3-0  San Francisco
DETROIT          9-6-0   6-2-0   3-4-0   2-1-0   7-5-0   4-4-0  @Miami
CHICAGO          9-6-0   5-2-0   4-4-0   3-0-0   6-6-0   3-5-0  New England
GREEN BAY        8-7-0   7-1-0   1-6-0   1-3-0   7-4-0   5-2-0  @Tampa Bay

x-SAN FRANCISCO 13-2-0   7-1-0   6-1-0   3-1-0  10-1-0   6-0-0  @Minnesota
9.3007Shula and his golf cart weren't happy...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 21 1994 14:4112
>    Marshall Faulk fails to impress in yet another locally televised game.
>    Four strikes and you're out Marshall.
    
    Didn't see much of this game, but I did see Faulk put one heck of a move
    on a Dolphins' defender to pick up the 1st down to keep the clock
    running and the ball out of Dan Marino's hands at the end of the game,
    thereby sending Don Shula into a bout of apoplexy directed at his D- 
    coordinator Tom Olivadotti.  Worked for me...
    
    glenn
    
9.3009So he's not "great" yet... BFD...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 21 1994 15:0821
    
   >>  Didn't see much of this game, 
   > 
   >    I'm sure you didn't or else you'd have to concur that in four
   >    local appearances including this last one Marshall has been quite 
   >    unimpressive.
    
    Hard to say.  I'd seen the other games and didn't completely agree with
    your cynical assessments then, either.  I did see that Faulk once again
    picked up his 4.0 yards a pop.  I don't know much but I do know that
    that's the magic number for an efficient running game.  Furthermore the
    Colts controlled the ball well with the running game, won it (!) and 
    Faulk made a key play to seal that victory.  And it's not like I'm in here 
    every week pumping Faulk as you say (he's exceeded my expectations; the
    Colts and any other reasonable parties are very happy with him) or
    giving weekly status/agitatus like "meanwhile, in a game Tommy Brydie 
    didn't see, Errict Rhett fell for 2.9 yards/carry against a pathetic 
    Redskins' defense".  Because I don't care.  It's gotten old.
    
    glenn
    
9.3010PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Dec 21 1994 15:356
    Anyone else gain more appreciation this season for Barry Sanders now
    that we've seen him play on local TV several times this season?
    
    I have.
    
    Mark.
9.3011yepHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 21 1994 15:4211
What impresses me most about Sanders is apparent disregard for personal
achievement. He doesn't seem to care if he scores, gains yards or
otherwise plays. How many other backs would agree to come out of the game
immediately after they just advanced the ball to the 2.

Now compare Sanders to Emmitt. Emmitt is hurting but he wants back in the
game. Why? He wants the record. Who cares if'n he does further injury to
his hamstrings hampering his teams chances in the playoffs. He's playing
for the record. Move him down the respect ladder.

TTom
9.3013CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Dec 21 1994 16:027
|   Anyone else gain more appreciation this season for Barry Sanders now
|   that we've seen him play on local TV several times this season?
 
I have too.  I've never seen a back who is so good at making a good run 
when there is no hole.  This includes Payton, Sayers, and Campbell.

=Bob=
9.3014PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Dec 21 1994 16:163
    See the spin he put on the DL from Minnie this past Saturday?
    
    Mark.
9.3015HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 21 1994 16:2012
  I'm confused about Emmitt Smith.

  How do you know it's a matter of him being selfish and wanting the record?

  Some guys just like to play and when a game starts they are like a Dalmatian
hearing a fire bell. Suddenly the pain is gone and they want to go into the
game just because there's people playing football and their not on the field.

  Could Emmitt be one of those or is there other evidence that he only cares
about #1?

  George
9.3016SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensWed Dec 21 1994 16:223
    
    Emmitt said he just wants to get in for one play to keep the record
    going.  nuff said.
9.3017HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 21 1994 16:273
  What record are we talking about here?

  George
9.3019HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 21 1994 16:337
RE        <<< Note 9.3018 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>      Do your homework, George. Emmit has an 82 game streak going.
    
  So is this already a record or is he trying to break one?

  George
9.3020he/they said itHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 21 1994 17:0016
I cait figger how he thinks he got a streak. What about them games lasted
year when he sat out while his team played. How can they not count
against the streak.

The record that I was talking about was the TD record fo 24 in a season.
He's got 22.

As for evidence of selfishness, it's about the onliest thing the 'Boys
are talking about: put him in for 1 play to keep the "streak" alive; put
him in at the 2 a couple of times to get the TD mark.

It shore sounds like he's thinking a lot about records and precious
little about his team's chances in the playoffs. This game with the
Giants means diddly squat for the Cowboys.

TTom
9.3021Where sports is coming toAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Dec 21 1994 17:1710
    sometimes there's direct money written in the contract or these kind of
    worthless stats come up in bargaining both in the works of agents and
    similarly lame-brained general managers.
    
    I have read in baseball strike discussions that "stats" will have an
    increasing importance in relation to salaries.
    
    Also I heard on the radio something about a silver lining in baseball
    strike discussion (feel free to answer this in the baseball or baseball
    strike note).
9.3022PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Wed Dec 21 1994 18:3710
    What day is Super Bowl Sunday, or "One for the Thumb for the STEELERS
    DAY!!!"?????
    
    Is is Jan 29th???
    
    If so, I'm going to be one highly ticked off individual, as I just got
    word I'm on call that day!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
9.3023METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 21 1994 18:396
I'm pretty sure that there are 2 weeks between the Championship games
and the SB which would put the SB on Jan 29th. But 'ya know it may turn out
for the best that you are on call if the Steelers don't make it that
far.

The Crazy Met
9.3024Sorry JaKe...but if Stillers are in work should be quiet, no?EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 21 1994 18:429
> I'm pretty sure that there are 2 weeks between the Championship games
> and the SB which would put the SB on Jan 29th.
    
    You are correct, sir...
    
    
    glenn
    
9.3025SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Wed Dec 21 1994 18:4616
    
    Jake,
    
    	Start moaning and groaning now. The SB is always the last Sunday
    in January. Which is the 29th.
    
    Wild Card games will be December 31st a Saturday. They won't play them
    on Sunday because the TV networks are obligated to do the bowl games on
    the 1st.
    
    Division games will be on January 7/8.
    
    Conference Championship's on January 15th.
    
    	I thought they eliminated 2 weeks before the SB. So maybe the Bowl
    is January 22nd.
9.3026But trust me, you've got nothing to worry aboutAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Dec 21 1994 18:465
    but the game don't start until 6:30 at the earliest and by the time
    they've got bud bowl going, and all the rest of the garbage the "day"
    is over and you're into night time, 7pm on.
    
    And if you've got a 2nd shift I'd bet you'll get the last 30 minutes.
9.3027HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Dec 21 1994 18:4813
RE          <<< Note 9.3025 by SNAX::ERICKSON "Time for Vacation..." >>>

>    Wild Card games will be December 31st a Saturday. They won't play them
>    on Sunday because the TV networks are obligated to do the bowl games on
>    the 1st.
    
  Since they went with a 3rd wild card they have been playing the #3 division
winner v. the #3 wild card games on Saturday and the two regular wild card
games on Sunday.

  I believe a number of the college bowl games have been moved to the 2nd.

  George
9.3028PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Wed Dec 21 1994 18:5810
    WEll. on weekends, there's two peoples to cover standby fer the orifice
    I work out of.
    
    I'll be 50% of the crew fer that weekend.  Lessee, shut the beeper off
    2 minutes before gametime, chew lots of gum to hide the beer breath,
    and turn the beeper on again minutes after the STEELERS beat the
    sacrificial lamb from the NFC.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3029MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Wed Dec 21 1994 19:025
    I was under the impression that they did away with the two week
    delay between conference championship games and the SB.  No??
    
    
    billl
9.3030no, yes, hope notHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 21 1994 19:0611
Lasted year they did away with this break but they also had 2 buy weeks
for each team. The season took 18 weeks so there wasn't any time to have
this break in the playoffs.

Thised year, the season is 17 weeks so they put that week break back in
between the conference championships and the super bowl.

Personally, I like to see the byes and this week break go the way of the
instant replay.

TTom
9.3031Suck it up JaKe! ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 21 1994 19:0612
          
>    I was under the impression that they did away with the two week
>    delay between conference championship games and the SB.  No??
    
    That lasted for one year, after which the NFL abandoned its 18-week,
    2-bye regular season that still placed the Super Bowl on the last 
    weekend in January even with the one-week wait, because the playoffs 
    started a week later too.  It's back to the usual now, with the 2-week
    layoff...
    
    glenn
    
9.3032METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 21 1994 19:098
Some years (Bills-Giants) there has been only one week between the conference
championship and the SB; also happened with the 18 week season, I think.

re: playoffs - most of the major bowl games are on Jan. 2. Orange Bowl
is on Jan 1 because it is an 8PM start which is after the NFL playoffs 
are over. NFL wildcard will have 2 games on Sat. 12/31 and 2 on Sunday 1/1.

The Crazy Met
9.3033maybe?FXTROT::ALLEMANGWed Dec 21 1994 19:107
Re: .-1

That makes sense with a casino advertisement I got in the mail the
other day.  It made it sound like the Conference Champeenships were
on the 22nd.  At the time I was wondering if the SB was gonna be in
February for the first time that I could ever remember... but I hadn't
heard about losing the 2 week break then.
9.3034METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 21 1994 19:206
There were other years that had one week between the champ. and the SB that
were regular 14 and 16 week years; not sure why they only had the one
week break but it did happen in the 70's and 80's a few timtes.

The Crazy Met
9.3035Its a blessing jake...BSS::MENDEZWed Dec 21 1994 19:246
    Don't worry Jake....
    It may be a blessing that you don't see the Stillers' on Superbowl
    Sunday.  The 9ers are going to thrash em.
    
    Frank
    
9.3036PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Wed Dec 21 1994 19:338
    re.3035
    
    Nah, when the STEELERS play in the Super Bowl this year, it will bring
    ol' Vince's trophy back to the AFC fe rthe firsted time in many many
    years!!
    
    JaKe
    
9.3037MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 21 1994 20:046
    
        The Steelers vs. The Niners would have people fondly remembering 
       the Bills in the Super Bowl. It might be blessing in disguise be-
       cause it'd be over by the end of the first quarter and we could all
       concentrate on partying. Fortunately, the Steelers will have their 
       hands full just getting there and probably won't. 
9.3038PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Dec 21 1994 20:041
    Fish/Niners part deux.
9.3039PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Wed Dec 21 1994 20:0511
    
    >>    The Steelers vs. The Niners would have people fondly remembering 
    >>   the Bills in the Super Bowl. It might be blessing in disguise be-
    >>   cause it'd be over by the end of the first quarter and we could all
    >>   concentrate on partying. Fortunately, the Steelers will have their 
    >>   hands full just getting there and probably won't. 
    
    And it would suprize many that the 49ers lost so bad, too.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3040METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 21 1994 20:055
Niners vs. anyone would have people fondly remembering Buffalo the last 3
times.

The Crazy Met
9.3041MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 21 1994 20:107
    >> And it would suprize many that the 49ers lost so bad, too.
    
       Keep telling yoursef that long enough and maybe you'll eventually
       believe it. The reality is that Deion could probably outscore
       Pittsburg all by himself. Like I say though, Pittsburg has to
       get there first and with their offense that's no certainty.
    
9.3042What are the alternatives here?EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 21 1994 20:1515
>       The Steelers vs. The Niners would have people fondly remembering 
>       the Bills in the Super Bowl. 
    
    Who else has even a remote chance of slowing down the 49ers' offense?
    There certainly aren't any teams in the AFC with offenses good enough
    to attempt to get into a scoring duel with the 49ers, so the AFC might
    as well send a team that'll try to bludgeon them to death with the
    conference's best defense and best rushing attack, catch a few breaks 
    and maybe steal one.  The Steelers are well-coached and disciplined, 
    too.  I guarantee that no Steeler will forget where his helmet is 
    before the game even starts... 
    
    glenn
    
9.3043Offense sells Tickets, Defense wins ChampionshipsPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFWed Dec 21 1994 20:3220
>       The Steelers vs. The Niners would have people fondly remembering 
>       the Bills in the Super Bowl. 
    
  The following list is endless but here's a good start:
	1. In '69 the Colts were supposed to slaughter the 18 1/2 point underdog
	   Jets. Now, everybody knows who Joe Namath is but nobody seems to
	   remember Earl Morral. 
	2. In '74, the Raiders n the Dolphins were clearly the best teams in the
	   NFL. The winner of their playoff game was expected to cruise to
	   a SuperBowl win. The Steeler's ended up winning the SuperBowl 4 
	   outta 6 years starting that year.
	3. Florida State was already ordained as the "team of the century" and
	   an 18 point favorite in last year's Orange Bowl. But it took every
	   bad call in the book to squeek out a win against Nebraska.

  I agree, if it's a 49'er/Steeler Superbowl, the 49'ers should be favored.
  But never ever underestimate the ability of a defensive power to
  find a way to win.

	Keith
9.3044here we Steelers, here we go.PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFWed Dec 21 1994 20:4315
> The reality is that Deion could probably outscore
> Pittsburg all by himself. 

  yea, yea, Deion is good at covering receivers and taunting his opponents
  after he makes an interception. But if he ends up playing the Steeler's
  in the SuperBowl, he'll have to try tackling a couple of runaway freight
  trains like Foster and Morris. The SF fans may wish they had Ronnie Lott
  back there who could hit instead of a guy who doesn't like to get dirty.
  
  If you compare Woodsen and Sanders, Woodsen clearly stands out as the
  best player. Woodsen gives you the whole package of someone who can cover,
  be a team player, return kicks, make the INT, sack the QB and knock a 
  running back flat on his back. 

	Keith
9.3045MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 21 1994 20:4417
    
    >> I guarantee that no Steeler will forget where his helmet is 
    >> before the game even starts... 
    
       That would be about the only plus for Steelers' fans. No one in
       the AFC is going to beat San Francisco and certainly not a team
       with the one dimensional offense of the Steelers. It wouldn't
       be Vinny Testaverde and his bumbling friends that the Steelers
       beat by a whopping 17-7. It's the most efficient QB ever leading
       one of the most potent offenses ever with a very good defense to
       boot. I'd rather see Miami or New England or the Raiders who can
       at least provide some excitement on the other side of the ball than
       the Steelers three and outing it to the Niners as the Niners run
       hog wild. The Steelers ain't seen nothing like what the Niners can
       throw at 'em. The Bills had the best defense in the AFC once upon a
       nightmare, too.
    
9.3046I'll fax to any of you diehardsAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Dec 21 1994 21:129
    I see that another one of our free wsj's had an article on
    Steelers-Browns.  Jake, Groaner; got a fax #?
    
    Article indicated that browns got the best of it on the field but
    miscues and penalties made the difference.  Also, comments on city as
    well as team rivalry.
    
    Congrats to both of you for making the national finance daily's "sprot
    page"
9.3047MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 21 1994 23:505
    But Dallas might beat SF. In which case I think the AFC has a better
    chance to finally win a SB.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.3048ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Thu Dec 22 1994 00:467
9.3049MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Dec 22 1994 11:1420
>  If you compare Woodsen and Sanders, Woodsen clearly stands out as the
>  best player. Woodsen gives you the whole package of someone who can cover,
>  be a team player, return kicks, make the INT, sack the QB and knock a 
>  running back flat on his back. 
>
>	Keith

   Woodson isn't a great cover man, and isn't anywhere near Sanders in that
   category; Deion is probably the best cover CB in the history of the NFL,
   and makes Woodson look very average in comparison (Woodson, as a cover CB,
   really isn't much better than average).  Woodson doesn't intercept the ball
   any better, and in fact less often, then Deion.  Clearly Deion is at least
   a little, if not quite a bit better, at returning kicks.  Woodson is a
   far superior tackler and hitter, much more feared in other aspects of the
   defensive game, and is also a far superior team player (although his
   teammates have historically denounced claims that Deion is anything but
   a good person to have in the clubhouse).  Clearly Woodson is a great CB,
   but especially so in the Pittsburgh scheme of defense.  In a defense where
   the primary responsibility of the CB is to defend the WR, Sanders is a
   better choice.
9.3050MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Dec 22 1994 11:1914
>        <<< Note 9.3045 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
>    
>       That would be about the only plus for Steelers' fans. No one in
>       the AFC is going to beat San Francisco and certainly not a team
>       with the one dimensional offense of the Steelers.

        I think both Dallas and Detroit might have something to say about SF
        going to the Super Bowl.  Moreover, I think that a power running team
        like Pittsburgh stands a much better chance than Miami or New England.
	Deion is just going to shut down the best passing option the opposing
	team will have.  Pittsburgh would have the best chance of just 
	plowing through the middle, and employing the basic style of offense
	the Giants used in beating a very high powered Bills offense in the
	Super Bowl.
9.3051BIGQ::MCKAYThu Dec 22 1994 11:334
    Jake I find it hard to believe ANYONE who knows you, would dare call
    you in IF the Steelers are in the super bowl.  8*)
    
    Jimbo
9.3052Call me 'doubting Thomas'MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Thu Dec 22 1994 11:446
    Is this 49er team that everyone seems ready to crown as SB champs
    the same one that looked like this year's University of Pittsburgh
    squad a few weeks ago?  I think they were playing the Falcons.
    
    
    billl
9.3053Huh?CSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Thu Dec 22 1994 12:0411
>>         <<< Note 9.3052 by MKFSA::LONG "Steelers...strivin' fer 5!" >>>
>>                         -< Call me 'doubting Thomas' >-

>>    Is this 49er team that everyone seems ready to crown as SB champs
>>    the same one that looked like this year's University of Pittsburgh
>>    squad a few weeks ago?  I think they were playing the Falcons.
    
Didn't the beat the Falcons something like 51-17? 


Jerry
9.3054PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Thu Dec 22 1994 12:415
    The niners last loss was in their 4th game, to the Iggles, by a score
    of 40-8.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3055HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Dec 22 1994 12:4511
RE                    <<< Note 9.3043 by PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF >>>

>	1. In '69 the Colts were supposed to slaughter the 18 1/2 point underdog
>	   Jets. Now, everybody knows who Joe Namath is but nobody seems to
>	   remember Earl Morral. 

  Wasn't Johnny Unitis the QB for Baltimore back then? I seem to remember a lot
of talk from Namath about how Unitis was his hero and that made the game all
that much more important.

  George
9.3056MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Thu Dec 22 1994 13:0418
    re 49ers:
    
    Okay, so my memory isn't what it used to be...that doesn't make
    me a bad person, does it?
    
    It was actually the 49er-Rams game I was referring to.  Sure the 
    49ers won 31-27, but if they sure didn't look like the 'all-powerful,
    all-world, soon to be SB champs' to me.
    
    That's not to say that every team doesn't have its bad games, but every
    team is not be dubbed SB champs by nearly everyone before the playoffs
    have even begun.
    
    My point is that the 49ers are just as beatable as the Steelers,
    Cowboys, Patriots, Dolphins, etc.
    
    
    billl
9.3057Hell, these guys haven't even been tested recentlySALEM::DODAWorking on mysteries without any cluesThu Dec 22 1994 13:0412
Billlll,

The Niners make a habit of scoring 50 points a game. When was the 
last time the Steelers put up 50 in ONE game. Fact is, that's a 
months worth of scoring for Pitt. The Steelers are good, but the 
Niners are too much for any team. Cover all of Young's options 
and he goes off for a 20 yd jaunt down the field. Leave one of 
the options uncovered, he finds it. Stop Watters or Rice or 
Taylor, or Jones, but you can't stop them all at the same time.
Not these days....

daryll
9.3058MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Thu Dec 22 1994 13:085
    Daryll, last I checked a WIN by one point looks the same in the books 
    as a win by 50+.  
    
    
    billl
9.3059CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Thu Dec 22 1994 13:0810
|  Wasn't Johnny Unitis the QB for Baltimore back then? I seem to remember a lot
|of talk from Namath about how Unitis was his hero and that made the game all
|that much more important.

My recallection was that Unitas was injured in mid-season, and that Earl
Morril (sp?) took over.  He led the Colts to the NFC champeenship, and 
into the Supe.  Late in the Supe, when the Colt offense was floundering, 
Unitas was put in, but was ineffective.

=Bob=
9.3060MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Thu Dec 22 1994 13:138
    re 49ers:
    
    Just so no one gets the wrong impression...I think the 49ers are a
    good team with their share of offensive weapons, but I also happen to
    think they can (and will) be beaten.
    
    
    billl
9.3061METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Dec 22 1994 13:208
and in this case billl is most definitely an ObjectiveSportsAnalyst.


Best scenario is Dallas, NE, Pigsturd, Clevescum, Dolphins, Faiders being
eliminated as early as possible. There could then be sane discussion about
the playoffs for the first time in years.

The Crazy Met
9.3062some double resultsHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Dec 22 1994 13:3215
>  The following list is endless but here's a good start:

Namath in 69: Unitas played in the second half of this loss and guided
the Colts to their onliest score.

FWIW, here's the results of dougle digit spreads:

        I--Green Bay, favored by 14, def. Kansas City, 35-10
        II--Green Bay, favored by 13, def. Oakland Raiders, 33-14
        III--New York Jets, underdog by 19, def. Baltimore, 16-7
        IV--Kansas City, underdog by 13 1/2, def. Minnesota, 23-7
        XIV--Pittsburgh, favored by 10, def. Los Angeles Rams, 31-19
        XX--Chicago, favored by 10, def. New England, 46-10
        XXIV--San Francisco, favored by 12, def. Denver, 55-10
        XXVIII--Dallas, favored by 10 1/2, def. Buffalo, 30-13
9.3063MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Thu Dec 22 1994 13:465
    TC*, the discussion is already sane, your Jesters are history.
    
    
    hth,
    billl
9.3064HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Dec 22 1994 13:4715
RE  <<< Note 9.3059 by CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH "Hakuna Matata - means no worries..." >>>

>My recallection was that Unitas was injured in mid-season, and that Earl
>Morril (sp?) took over.  He led the Colts to the NFC champeenship, and 
>into the Supe.  Late in the Supe, when the Colt offense was floundering, 
>Unitas was put in, but was ineffective.

  That sounds familiar. One nit, the Colts had to win not only their conference
championship but they also had to win the NFL championship to get into that
game which they lost to the AFL champion Jets.

  The merger which resulted in the NFC champion playing the AFC champion in
the superbowl didn't happen until after that season.

  George
9.3065KC lasted of the AFL?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Dec 22 1994 13:519
I think Kansas City beat Minnesota the lasted year of the AFL-NFL. 

Also, in another little quirk, KC became the firsted Super Bowl winner
who didn't win their division. They finished second, won the western
playoff, won the AFL playoff and won the whole thang.

But of course, not all of them brain cells work like they used to.

TTom
9.3066ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Thu Dec 22 1994 14:222
9.3067ramblin' superbowl thoughtsBSS::MENDEZThu Dec 22 1994 14:2310
    I thought that when the Raiders beat the Iggles in the superbowl,
    they became the first team to win the whole thing as a wildcard entry?
    
    Were the Chiefs a wildcard entry?
    
    
    BTW,  I've been a 9er fan for 30 years and while they should win the
    whole thang this year...The Cowboys and Steelers do pose significant
    problems.  Especially on defense!!!
    
9.3068METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Dec 22 1994 14:252
I'm pretty sure the score of KC-Minn was 23-7. Only the Broncos have managed
only a FG in the SB - (1977 season, 1978 SB ?) against Dallas 
9.3069not wildHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Dec 22 1994 14:299
KC won despite not winning the division but they weren't called a "wild
card".

The Raiders won it as a real wild card and Buffalo got there but lost as
another wild card.

Also, Miami mustered a mere FG in their loss to Dallas.

TTom
9.3070OLD1S::CADZILLA2IDRINKALONEWITHMYBUDDYJACKDANIELSThu Dec 22 1994 14:4632
    
    
    SCORES FOR ALL GAMES
    
    SB I      GREEN BAY  35  KC         10 
       II     GREEN BAY  33  OAKLAND    14
       III    NY JETS    16  BALTIMAORE 7
       IIII   KC         23  MINNESOTA  7
       V      BALTIMORE  16  DALLAS     13
       VI     DALLAS     24  MIAMI      3
       VII    MIAMI      14  WASHINGTON 7
       VIII   MIAMI      24  MINNESOTA  7
       IX     PITTSBURG  16  MINNESOTA  6
       X      PITTSBURG  21  DALLAS     17
       XI     OAKLAND    32  MINNESOTA  14
       XII    DALLAS     27  DENVER     10
       XIII   PITTSBURG  35  DALLAS     31
       XIV    PITTSBURG  31  LA RAMS    19
       XV     OAKLAND    27  PHILLY     10
       XVI    SAN FRAN   26  CINCINN    19
       XVII   WASHINGTON 27  MIAMI      17
       XVIII  LA RAID    38  WASHINGTON 9
       XIX    SAN FRAN   38  MIAMI      16
       XX     CHICAGO    46  NEW ENG    10
       XXI    NY GIANTS  39  DENVER     20
       XXII   WASHINGTON 42  DENVER     10
       XXIII  SAN FRAN   20  CINCINN    16
       XXIV   SAN FRAN   55  DENVER     10
       XXV    NY GIANTS  20  BUFFALO    19
       XXVI   WASHINGTON 37  BUFFALO    24
       XXVII  DALLAS     52  BUFFALO    17
       XXVIII DALLAS     30  BUFFALO    13
9.3071SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensThu Dec 22 1994 14:4917
         >      <<< Note 9.3067 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>    
         >               -<ramblin' superbowl thoughts >-
    
    
    Frank, tell those DECSALE people to get that KennyG crap off of the
    music on hold.  It's bad enough that you guys are all sitting on your
    collective asses doing nothing while we wait on hold, but to play that
    junk in hopes that we'll hang up rather than have to listen to it for
    45 minutes straight is downright inhumane.
    
    BTW, while no one was looking, or those who bought it up earlier were
    ignoring it, the NFC now has a better record than the AFC, they passed
    them by a few weeks ago, and have steadily built up a bigger edge as
    the games got more important.  Little doubt again as to which
    conference is stronger.
    
    brews
9.3072ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Thu Dec 22 1994 14:554
9.3073GENRAL::WADEThu Dec 22 1994 15:274
    
    	Yer wrong on that Donk score TCM....
    
    Claybone
9.3074METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Dec 22 1994 15:375
yeah, I knew it was against Dallas, got the opponent wrong. Figured with
Denver I would have one of the best shots.

The Crazy Met
9.3075AFC has much more depthTNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're 4th and movin' up!Thu Dec 22 1994 16:4020
    Brews, you are so wrong it ain't funny.  Seven of the top ten teams in
    the NFL are in the AFC.  Unfortunately the two strongest teams by far
    are in the NFC.  So while the AFC has lots of very good teams, they
    will not win a Super Bowl until one of those very good teams can step
    up to the next level.
    
    IMO, here are the top ten teams in the NFL:
    
    	1. San Francisco
    	2. Dallas
    	3. Pittsburgh
    	4. Miami
    	5. Cleveland
    	6. New England
    	7. LA Raiders
    	8. Kansas City
    	9. Detroit
    	10. San Diego
    
    NAZZ
9.3076This one is for BrewsBSS::MENDEZThu Dec 22 1994 16:449
    Brews...
    
    Listen here,  that music is supposed to tranquilize you sales types.
    Everyone knows that you have personalities of sandpaper.  On a serious
    side...My christmas wish for you is for "Big" Dan to win just enough
    games to keep him permanently the coach of the Gints.
    
    Frank "hold please" Mendez
    
9.3077Head to Head dontcha know!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDA BEARS!!!!Thu Dec 22 1994 16:506
    
    
        Small nit Nazz
    
      Make Raiders #6
           Pats    #7
9.3078ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Thu Dec 22 1994 17:342
9.3079But We'll seeWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDA BEARS!!!!Thu Dec 22 1994 17:353
    
    
      RECORD WISE  Right now!!!
9.3080dance to the musicHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Dec 22 1994 17:4811
Hey Frank, 

I don't mind that music. I just make sure I have a window open for
::SPROTS so I have something to do while I wait. ;-)

BTW, did I tell you that someone in your group called me to see if'n I
liked the support I was getting. In true suck-up fashion I said you was
all good, especially that Mendez fella and that there Riggens guy. Y'all
can thank me for that big raise you got.

TTom
9.3081RamblingsLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Dec 22 1994 18:3124
      Patriots were a wild card as well.  Won at Jets, won at Raiders,
      won at Dolphins.
    
      Nazz, I agree there is more depth, BUT the degree to which the
      49'ers and the Cowboys are superior carries the NFC over the AFC
      imo.  And to have the Dolphins 4th in the entire NFL!!!  Man, they
      just recently lost to the Bills who are what 7-8?  They just lost
      to the Colts 10-6!!  Come on, if that's the 4th best team in the
      NFL!!
    
      At this point, I would have put the Lions higher and included the
      Vikings (who beat the Bills recently).  I'm biased, but I'd throw
      the Packers in there too!!
    
      The AFC teams are so one dimensional.  It is scary for the best teams
      to perhaps be Steelers, Browns.  Their QB's and offenses are very
      unimpressive.
    
      But, I think the AFC's best chance are the Steelers or the Patriots.
      The Steelers can maybe get lucky with that big play defense.  And
      maybe hold the clock.  Liek one guy said, the AFC's best chance is
      for the Steelers to pull a Giants type game (over Bills).
    
                                                        Tony
9.3082AKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberThu Dec 22 1994 18:4010
    With the Pats 3-0 over nfc and Bears 3-0 over AFC and similar records,
    perhaps this game can be used to measure league strengths.
    
    There is a scary nonchalance around Boston around this game which going
    in seems very difficult, especially after the emotional victory last
    week where breaks made it seem easier than it was.
    
    Hopefully Bears are simply like Giants - able thru excellent coaching
    to beat teams in their class but easy to beat for another well coached
    team with talent - eg Dallas, eg Pats.
9.3083PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!!Thu Dec 22 1994 18:549
    
>>The Niners make a habit of scoring 50 points a game. When was the 
>>last time the Steelers put up 50 in ONE game. Fact is, that's a 
    
    Lasted time the STEELERS put up 50+ points in a game was against the
    Brown(spot)s(tm) a coupla years ago.  beat them 50-3, or 51-3.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3084MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleSun Dec 25 1994 03:2023
    Lets see if I have this right. Chargers beat the Steelers, clinching
    the first week bye. 
    Pats beat the Bears 
    Chiefs beat the Raiders
    Cleveland beat Seattle.
    
    If Miami wins they win the East and host KC, Cleveland hosts the Pats.
    If Miami loses, Pats win the east and host KC, Cleveland hosts Miami.
    
    First a q. about the NFC. In the case of Minnesota, Detroit, and
    Chicago they could each lose and make the playoffs if the Giants won,
    why? Is it because the Giants would win the tie break against the
    Cardinals and then lost to each of the NFC Central teams?
    
    In the NFC, Chicago, Green Bay, Detroit, Minnesota are all in the
    playoffs. Chicago can no longer win the division. These 4 teams will
    all be playing next weekend. Who plays where will not be finalized
    until after the SF/Minnesota game on Monday since Minnesota wins the
    division with a win. Minnesota cannot win the division with a loss
    since GB or Detroit(if they win) would beat them out.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.3085MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Dec 26 1994 14:1220
    For a disinterested observer (as far as the teams go) the AFC playoffs
    wildcard week has the dream matchup - Pats at Browns; the joy of seeing
    all you Pats and Browns fans at each others throats for a week. I
    expect to see some serious zingers, and p_name bets on this one
    folks!!! Don't let down a fine ::sprots tradition.
    
    KC at Miami is the other game.
    
    Week 2 will have 
           If KC wins, KC at Pigsturd, winner of Pats-Browns at SD.
           If Miami wins, Miami at SD, winner of Pats-Browns at Pigsturd.
    
    In the NFC, if Minnesota wins tonight, Chicago at Minnesota, Detroit at
    Green Bat. If Minnesota loses, Chicago at GB(div winner), Detroit at
    Minnesota. You have to believe that both Detroit and Chicago hope
    Minnesota loses; they both play on the road either way and this way
    Detroit stays in the dome and Chicago stays outdoors.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.3086MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Dec 26 1994 18:429
>    In the NFC, if Minnesota wins tonight, Chicago at Minnesota, Detroit at
>    Green Bat. If Minnesota loses, Chicago at GB(div winner), Detroit at
>    Minnesota. You have to believe that both Detroit and Chicago hope
>    Minnesota loses; they both play on the road either way and this way
>    Detroit stays in the dome and Chicago stays outdoors.

     Green Bay just destroyed Chicago both times; Green Bay is hot, while
     both Minnesota and Chicago are fairly cold.  I can't believe there is
     any way Chicago hopes to play at Green Bay rather than at Minnesota.
9.3087MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Dec 26 1994 23:065
    Of course if Minnesota wins tonight that means they will have beaten SF
    and I doubt Chicago would be thrilled about that.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.3088Could they really be human????MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Tue Dec 27 1994 11:4211
    I know all those who were trying last week to convince me that the
    49ers were the elite of the NFL, will say that the 49ers had all of
    their third stingers playing last night, but I don't buy it.  If this
    team is really as deep as everyone likes to believe, the 'superior'
    talent of this 'depth' should have crushed the sporatic Vikes.
    
    Didn't quite happen, did it?  In fact wasn't the score 9-7 Vikes at
    the half with all the starters playing?
    
    
    billl
9.3089Detroit can beat 'em, thoughMIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Dec 27 1994 12:0111
	I hate to say this, but I still think SF is a far superior
	team.  I'd rather see Green Bay or Detroit come out of the NFC than
	anyone else (SF/Dallas are my bottom choices of the 12 playoff teams),
	but I believe the 49'ers have shown all year long that they
	dominate in the second half.  Mostly, I look at the detailed results
	against the local team (the Falcons), where Atlanta was able to stay
	close in the first half, only to get kicked silly in the second half.

	I suspect that had the 49'er starting offense had played the whole
	game rather than 17-18 minutes, the result would have been a lot
	different.
9.3090CSLALL::BRULEgo ahead with your own life leave me aloneTue Dec 27 1994 12:245
    tcm,
    I think Paul and Joe H are out for the week. So I don't know who's left
    for the Browns?
    
    Mike
9.3091SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Tue Dec 27 1994 12:2425
    
    	Well no team went 16-0 so they are all can be beat. Granted SF
    is the favorite to win at this point. If you play a perfect game you
    can  beat them. Here would be my 4 keys to beating SF.
    
    1) Ball control, you must have the ball 35-38 minutes. Keeping the SF
       offense off of the field. Giving them the ball only 22-25 minutes.
    
    2) The defense has to be patient and don't tip off the blitz to Young.
       When Steve Young picks up the blitz and audibles. He audibles to
       a play that will kill you. Most notable when you blitz a safety/
       corner. They will put Watters in motion towards the side the blitz
       is coming from. So they other corner/safety has to pick him up out
       of the back field. Leaving the deep middle uncovered. Jerry Rice
       then knows he has single coverage with no help in the middle. So
       he runs a slant across the middle.
    
    3) Turnovers, you have to force SF to cough up the ball. You have to
       hold onto it.
    
    4) DOUBLE COVERAGE on Jerry Rice on EVERY play. He kills you one on
       one. Make Watters, Taylor, or Jones beat you, but not Jerry Rice.
    
    
    Ron
9.3092CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 27 1994 12:5626
re: Niners

I haven't made a study of their roster, but my buddy in the Bay Area 
explained to me the Niners' strategy:

They have loaded their front line with solid-to-spectacular players, 
goign otu and getting Norton, Sanders, etc., but then signed basically
NFL: minimum guys as their second stringers.  As a result, they are
cominant as along as the first unuit is together, and ordinary when 
they play their backups.  Lasted night proves that theory.

re: NFC 'offs

The Packers are hot right now.  They have probably played the best ball 
in the NFC outside the Niners for the past month.  The Bears look 
ordinary, as do the Vikes, at least without Moon.  I was thinking that 
the Lions were playing well, until Miami dumped all over them thised 
weekend.

re: AFC 'offs

Go Pats.  Boy would it be sweet to beat the Woofers.  I've said before
that I think the Browns are the second best team in the AFC, but the 
Pats are the hottest team in football right now, so it may happen.

=Bob=
9.3093METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Dec 27 1994 13:036
Is Hal around??

btw did Young eclipse Montana's record QB rating for a year??

The Crazy Met
9.3094CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 27 1994 13:053
| btw did Young eclipse Montana's record QB rating for a year??

Yes, and then was promptly pulled from the game.
9.3095BIGQ::MCKAYTue Dec 27 1994 13:506
    I doubt Hal is around this week as Fab 6 is closed for the week.
    Iceman may be in he's in the other building.
    
    Pat's in a laugher!!!!!
    
    Jimbo
9.3096just wonderin'MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Tue Dec 27 1994 13:558
    Does anyone have the seeding 1-6 in both AFC and NFC?
    
    I thought I saw somwhere that if the Pats didn't win the division
    they would go from ranked #2, with a bye, to #6.  That would mean 
    after they beat the Browns they would play the Steelers, the #1 seed.
    
    
    billl
9.3097MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 27 1994 13:576
    
       If I could have chosen the first round opponent for the Pats, I would
      have chosen the Browns or the Chargers. In fact, I'd rather be playing
      the Browns in Cleveland than the Chiefs here. We're hot. They're not.
      Our defense is playing the best it has all year. They've got Vinny
      Testaverde. Nuff said.
9.3098seedsHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 27 1994 13:597
	   NFC:                 AFC:
	1. San Francisco        Pittsburgh
	2. Dallas               San Diego
	3. Minnesota            Miami
	4. Green Bay            Cleveland
	5. Detroit              New England
	6. Chicago              Kansas City
9.3099so many questions, so little time...MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Tue Dec 27 1994 14:1714
    re .3098:
    
    Thanks, TTom.  That explains some things that were about as clear
    as mud before.
    
    If the Pats and the Dolphins both win, it does look like the Pats
    would go to the 'burgh and the Chargers would host the Fish.
    
    Does anyone know for certian whether the Browns would be going to
    the 'burgh if'n them and the Fish win?  Or is there some rule about
    interdivisional play before the conference finals?
    
    
    billl
9.3100awaitingHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 27 1994 14:183
Should be some good games, especially the Pats at the Browns.

TTom
9.3101MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Dec 27 1994 14:1912
>    Does anyone know for certian whether the Browns would be going to
>    the 'burgh if'n them and the Fish win?  Or is there some rule about
>    interdivisional play before the conference finals?

     There's no such rule any more.  If Miami and Cleveland win, the Browns
     travel to Pittsburgh for round 2.

     When they moved to 3 wild card teams, they removed that restriction.
     Suppose Minnesota had won the #2 spot and Dallas won the #3 spot.
     Chicago defeats Dallas in the first round, and GB-Detroit winner also
     goes on to the next round.  There would be no way to avoid an NFC Central
     2nd-round matchup, so the league decided to drop it.
9.3102notes collisionMETSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Dec 27 1994 14:216
The interdivisional rule was eliminated when they added a 3rd wild card team.

If the Browns and Dolphins win then the Browns go to Pittsburgh
and the Dolphins go to SD.

The Crazy Met
9.3103figurin' all the angles...MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Tue Dec 27 1994 14:478
    re last 2:
    
    Thanks.  I thought that was the case.  Looks like the only way the
    Steelers could play the Pats, before the AFC championship game,  is 
    if'n the Fish and the Pats both win this weekend.
    
    
    billl
9.3104SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensTue Dec 27 1994 16:2815
    >TNPUBS::NAZZARO "We're 4th and movin' up!"          
    >
    >-< AFC has much more depth>-
    >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------   
    
    >Brews, you are so wrong it ain't funny.  Seven of the top ten teams in   
    >the NFL are in the AFC.  Unfortunately the two strongest teams by far   
    >are in the NFC. 
    
    Excuse me for basing my arguement on something as slippery as facts,
    Nazz, but look at the interConference records.  But once again, the NFC
    won more games than the AFC.   Add this to the almost certain SuperBowl
    victory, and I can't see how you can object.
    
    brews
9.3105NFL ALl ProHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 27 1994 17:0130
All-NFL:

	1st Team Offense	2nd Team Offense
WR	Jerry Rice, SF		Terance Mathis, ATL
	Cris Carter, MIN	Irving Fryar, MIA
TE	Ben Coates, NE		Brent Jones, SF
TKL	Willaim Roaf, NO	Lomas Brown, DET
	Richmond Webb, MIA	Tony Jones, CLE
GRD	Nate Newton, DAL	Keith Sims, MIA
	Randall McDaniel, MIN	Steve Wisniewski, Raiders
C	Dermontti Dawson, PIT	Mark Stepnoski, DAL
QB	Steve Young, SF		Dan Marino, MIA
RB	Barry Sanders, DET	Marshall Faulk, IND
	Emmitt Smith, DAL	Chris Warren, SEA
PK	John Carney, SD		Faud Reveiz, MIN
KR	Mel Gray, DET		Brian Mitchell, WAS

	1st Team Defense	2nd Team Defense
E	Charles Haley, DAL	Reggie White, GB
	Bruce Smith, BUF	Leslie O'Neal, SD
TKL	John Randle, MIN	Chester McClockton, Raiders
	Cortez Kennedy, SEA	Dean Perry, CLE
OLB	Greg Lloyd, PIT		Ken Harvey, WAS
	Kevin Greene, PIT	Derrick Thomas, KC
MLB	Junior Seau, SD		Chris Spielman, DET
CB	Deion Sanders, SF	Terry McDaniel, Raiders
	Rod Woodson, PIT	Aeneas Williams, ARIZ
S	Eric Turner, CLE	Merton Hanks, SF
	Darren Woodson, DAL	Carnell Lake, PIT
P	Reggie Roby, MIA	Rick Tuten, SEA
9.3106SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensTue Dec 27 1994 17:017
    
    Oh, and thanks to Frank and Jeff for that wonderful recording left on
    my voicemail.  Hopefully you've got that crap off your music on hold
    (or at least you are answering the phone promptly, for once).
    
    
    brews
9.3107Who chose these guys, anyway?CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 27 1994 17:059
|	1st Team Defense	2nd Team Defense
|E	Charles Haley, DAL	Reggie White, GB
|	Bruce Smith, BUF	Leslie O'Neal, SD

I don't get this one.  In the games that I saw, nobody played better 
defensive tackle thised year than Reggie White.  All I can think of 
is that it is because he missed a couple of games.

=Bob=
9.3108APHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 27 1994 17:079
This is the AP team so you can blame them.

The one for Green Bay that got jobbed was Bryce Paup.

Also, Barry Sanders was the onliest unanimous selection, getting a vote
on all 98 ballots. Steve Young was nexted with 96 votes with Marino
getting the other 2. Didn't anyone happen to notice Drew Bledsoe?

TTom
9.3109CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldTue Dec 27 1994 18:108
 If we're talking GB players that got jobbed, I'd say Farve has a beef
 being passed by for fancy pants Dan and certainly the joke of the whole
 mess, Fryar before Sharpe? Fryar before Reed? Fryar before etc etc....

 haha

 mike
9.3110popularityHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Dec 27 1994 18:1810
I heard over the weekend that Sterling Sharpe is gonna boycott the Pro
Bowl cause Favre dint get selected.

All of these votings are pretty much just popularity contests. It rewards
people for past performances and people like Marino are gonna get voted
cause most of these lame brains hardly heard of most of the other
starting QBs. It's a minor wonder that they're not all still voting for
Joe Montana.

TTom
9.3111Sean Jones had a quiet good year also...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 27 1994 18:2517
re: All-Pro Packers 

White -	As I said, there was no more dominant player in defense that I saw.

Paup - 	I agree that he was at least one of the top two at his position 
	thised year.

Sharpe -Maybe the thinking was "awe, he always makes it, let's give 
	someone else a shot". He wasn't as good as lasted year, but 
	lasted year he was close to perfect.

Farve - Perhaps I'm a bit like 'Saw with Dan Reeves here, but I refuse
	to beleive that Brett Farve is one of the two bested QBs in 
	football.  Granted, he is improved from lasted year, but he still
	makes too many mistakes.

=Bob=
9.3112SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensTue Dec 27 1994 18:314
    
    The other question is, how many All Pros can a 9-7 team have?
    
    brews
9.3113SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Tue Dec 27 1994 18:3522
    
    	The AFC versus NFC was actually close this year. The NFC won by
    essentially 1 game. It was something like 37-35 NFC over the AFC.
    I think what NAZZ was referring to was the records of the 12 playoff
    teams.  There is a bigger margin between the top 2 and the other 4
    playoff teams in the NFC. Then there is in the AFC. Also each
    conference has 2 powder puffs (Houston, Cincinatti, Washington, Rams).
    It should be an interesting playoffs. With SF the favorite and
    Pittsburgh/Dallas right behind them.
    
    1.  San Franciso 13 - 3 NFC
    2.  Pittsburgh   12 - 4 AFC
    3.  Dallas       12 - 4 NFC
    4.  Cleveland    11 - 5 AFC
    5.  San Diego    11 - 5 AFC
    6.  Miami        10 - 6 AFC
    7.  New England  10 - 6 AFC
    8.  Green Bay     9 - 7 NFC
    9.  Kansas City   9 - 7 AFC
    10. Minnesota     9 - 7 NFC
    11. Detroit       9 - 7 NFC
    12. Chicago       9 - 7 NFC
9.3114CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Tue Dec 27 1994 18:433
|MLB	Junior Seau, SD		Chris Spielman, DET

Y'know, the one SD game I saw, Seau was lined up as an outside LB...
9.3115MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Dec 27 1994 18:459
    
        Bryce Paup is a pretty good player who is made a lot better
       because he plays on the same line as Reggie White and Sean Jones.
       If Bryce got the same attention as Reggie, he'd be pretty middlin'.
       The one guy that I'd have to find a place for on my team is Tim
       Brown. Certainly ahead of Irving Fryar and Terance Mathis if not
       Cris Carter.
    
    
9.3116MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Tue Dec 27 1994 19:066
    While I agree with you rating of Tim Brown ahead of Fryar and Mathias,
    Tommy, I have been impressed with the play of Cris Carter everytime
    I see him play.  Last night was no exception.
    
    
    billl
9.3117Blowout is boring...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 28 1994 13:5830
    
>       I'd rather see Miami or New England or the Raiders who can
>       at least provide some excitement on the other side of the ball than
>       the Steelers three and outing it to the Niners as the Niners run
>       hog wild.
    
    We've heard this theme from the AFC for the last 10 years now, and have 
    had only two good Super Bowls to show for it, one of those from a team 
    in Cincinnati that inspired no one with any aerial brilliance but with
    just a good old-fashioned running game behind a power back and general
    all around competence.  In their respective heydays Denver and Buffalo 
    (and also Miami in their 1980s appearances) were long on "excitement" 
    and short on ball control, with or without respectable defenses.  It 
    may be boring but the best chance to beat the 49ers is to run the ball 
    on them.  That might not be easy and it might be a longshot, but it's 
    still the only way.
    
    The Raiders are already gone, thankfully.  They're pathetic and would
    have stood no chance if by some miracle they'd gotten there (Pittsburgh
    kicked the crap out of the Raiders on their home field).  It'll be fun 
    to follow the Patriots as they go as far as they can, but can anyone 
    seriously envision anything but absolute carnage if they were to take
    the field against the 49ers, having to throw on almost every down in
    order to move the ball?  Miami is slightly more solid but not by much.
    To me a reasonably close game for the longest possible time (like at
    least until halftime) is more entertaining than any romp, no matter 
    how close to the vest the game is played.
    
    glenn
    
9.3118SALEM::DODAGo Speed Racer, GO!Wed Dec 28 1994 14:0210
Right-o Billll,

Who knew that Grebac and Singleton would have an off night.

Of course, Pitt lost to the misChargers. What's the spin on that 
one?

Puh-lease.

daryll
9.3119MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 28 1994 14:2215
    
  >> We've heard this theme from the AFC for the last 10 years now,

     Not really. Generally, what we've heard is that SB will be a blowout
     and they have with one exception and that was Buffalo with it's gimmicky
     no-huddle offense. What we've seen is an NFC with a dominating defense
     and a balanced offense whup up on inferior AFC teams. For my money, I
     don't even expect the Steelers to make it to the SB. Give Dan Marino
     a second crack at that Blitzburg defense and it won't be pretty. Joe
     Montna or Drew Bledsoe could probably put enough points (won't have to
     be many) to beat the Steelers. But if they did make it, (God forbid)
     and Seiffert and Young had two weeks to prep for the Steelers, it'd be 
     just another boring blowout.  SF would have no problem playing man cov-
     erage , overplaying the run and daring Pittsburg to throw.
    
9.3120must be those awsome Vikes!MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Wed Dec 28 1994 14:3415
    re .3118
    
    Try to keep up, please.  I never came in here and spewed mounds
    of "Steelers are the prima donna team in the NFL" like others
    have done with the 49ers.  
    
    The Steelers lost for the same reason the 49ers did.  The other
    team had more to gain by winning than the team that already was
    a lock for the HFA throughout.  
    
    Guess it only shows that the 49ers put their pants on one leg at
    a time, too.  Go figure!
    
    
    billl
9.3121CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldWed Dec 28 1994 14:567
 well Tommy when the Steelers get there we'll have to have a p-name bet.
 The only team in the AFC with a chance at them is the Pats. Marino
 isn't even Jesus let alone God anymore and after a few hits on Fryar
 and Ingram and co. his receivers will shortarm the ball.......

 mike
9.3122SALEM::DODAGo Speed Racer, GO!Wed Dec 28 1994 15:2923
Come on Billll,

The Niners pulled most of the starters in the 2nd qtr right 
after the Young to Rice TD tied the game. They brought in Grebac 
and the rest of backups and the offense went south. Coincidence?
Nope.

While the Vikes may have won the game anyway (but I doubt it), 
the starters surely would've done played a better game that what 
they had out there for close to 3 qtrs.

The Vikings had lost 9 of the last 10 to the Niners. Those 9 
losses were to a team that was inferior to the team that the 
NIners had on the field at kickoff on Monday night.

To take that performance and surmise that the Niners gave it 
their best and lost anyway is a reach.

The Niners could still lose in the playoffs, but using the Monday 
night game as an example doesn't scan.

daryll

9.3123DZIGN::ROBICHAUDOne More One...Wed Dec 28 1994 15:327
9.3124MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 28 1994 15:338
    >> well Tommy when the Steelers get there we'll have to have a 
    >> p-name bet.
    
       I generally don't do p-name bets but this is like stealing.
       I'll bet you on Pittsburg's first playoff game because I won't
       be at all surprised to see them lose that unless something
       fluky happens and they end up playing Cleveland.
9.3125CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldWed Dec 28 1994 15:3412
        <<< Note 9.3124 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>


    >> well Tommy when the Steelers get there we'll have to have a 
    >> p-name bet.
    
>       I generally don't do p-name bets but this is like stealing.
>       I'll bet you on Pittsburg's first playoff game because I won't
>       be at all surprised to see them lose that unless something
>       fluky happens and they end up playing Cleveland.

  that's fine with me........
9.3126MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Wed Dec 28 1994 15:3510
    Wasn't the 49ers' starting secondary playing deep into the third
    quarter?
    
    It was never my intention to use Monday night's game as proof that
    the 49ers would not win the SB.  It was merely to point out to 
    some that the team is not as deep in talent as some in here would
    like us to believe.
    
    
    billl
9.3128SALEM::DODAGo Speed Racer, GO!Wed Dec 28 1994 15:484
With the salary cap and free agency, no team carries the depth 
they used to. Stan Gelbaugh played last weekend!

daryll
9.3129MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Wed Dec 28 1994 15:4913
    >>   I'll bet you on Pittsburg's first playoff game because I won't
    >>   be at all surprised to see them lose that unless something
    >>   fluky happens and they end up playing Cleveland.
    
    By "fluky" do you mean like the favorites winning this weekend?
    Unless I've got it screwed up again (I know it's entirely
    possible) if Cleveland (#4 seed) beats the Pats, and the 
    'fins (#3 seed) beat the Chiefs, that's exactly what will
    happen.  Browns go to the 'burgh and the fish goe to SD.
    
    
    hth
    billl
9.3130MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Wed Dec 28 1994 15:518
    >>  when Montana was there. What's been said here is that Pittsburg 
    >>  couldn't give the Niners a game.
    
    	I, for one, hope that PittsburgH gets the opportunity to 
    	serve you up some delicious crow.
    
    
    	billl
9.3131SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Wed Dec 28 1994 15:555
    
    	Don't know about the rest of SF defense. I do no that
    Deion played only the 1st quarter if that.
    
    Ron
9.3132MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Wed Dec 28 1994 15:5910
    >> Deion played only the 1st quarter if that.
    
    	I think you better check your tape.  I didn't tune in until 
    just before the end of the first half and I was suprised to
    see him still in there.  In fact, the Wit-trips (Nit, Half and Dim)
    on MNF even commented that Salisbury was trowing away from Sanders
    aside from a few exceptions.  That was in the second half.
    
    
    billl
9.3133One or more of those teams will likely get their chanceEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 28 1994 17:0913
    If I had to make a call one way or the other, I'd probably have to
    agree; Pittsburgh most likely won't give San Fran a game, at least 
    not a great one.  The odds aren't too good.  The question is which 
    team(s) from the AFC are capable of such.  So Tommy, I understand your
    position to be that not only are New England, Miami, and Kansas City
    more capable of matching up with San Fran, but any of those teams also
    match up well enough with Pittsburgh that they will beat them in Three 
    Rivers Stadium in the upcoming playoff games?  If so, I'll take a piece 
    of that action...
    
    glenn
     
9.3134Bleak in January tooAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Dec 28 1994 17:2110
    As Foster goes so goes Pittsburgh.
    
    Homefield will be big come January weather.  Teams like San Diego and
    Miami (and K.C.) would appear to be at a disadvantage, though the
    coldest weather I've seen was San Diego - Cinci and the Chargers played
    tough though losing.  Patriots and Browns can play in that weather
    though the Pats haven't seen much of it this year.
    
    Butts would be a big key for Pats at 3rivers and if it ever comes to
    that it says here he comes up big time for them.
9.3135Pats are a very good team (considering there youth)MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Dec 28 1994 17:2432
    Hey be carefull how you talk about those pats.  There not as bad as
    some may think... Like many have stated time and time again, Defense
    win's championships.  Parcells put together a very good defense who
    in the first half of the season gave up alot of points and Bledsoe
    threw A TON OF INT's.  But in the 2nd half they went 7-1 and held there
    opponents to low scoring in most outings.
    
    Slowly they came up with more TAKEAWAYS then any other team in the
    league, and there running game is still (Even after 16 games) UNKNOWN
    butts doesnt seem to have it, but Leroy THompson, Sam Gash, Corie Croom
    etc are all capable of having BIG DAYS, and lastly you got BLEDSOE, ya
    he threw too many INTs but he also threw plenty of TD's and for MUCHO
    Yardage...
    
    The pats are one of the most exciting teams in the league
    
    BLEDSOE 691att, 400cmp 57.9% with 25TD's (27int) and 4555yrds
    Pats had 39 Sacks on the year, not sure where that ranks, 22 INT's.
    
    Will be a very intresting Playoffs, I think there will be a few upsets
    I hope Minny and Green Bay win this weekend, a Dallas VS Minnny and a
    GB VS SF will make for some intresting matchups, in the afc Im not
    going to say who I want, dont want to jinx anyone :-) but here's the
    more then likely winners
    
    PATS VS CLEVELAND	CLEV
    			S.D.    S.D.
    KC   VS MIA		MIA         	PITT
    			PITT	PITT
    
    Hope Im wrong :-)
    							mab
9.3136CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Dec 28 1994 17:255
|    Butts would be a big key for Pats at 3rivers and if it ever comes to
|    that it says here he comes up big time for them.

Butts cain't get out of the backfield on a clear day, what makes you 
think he'd be able to on slippery, frozen turf?
9.3137Got's no good feelings 'bout Ohio;wish it was elsewhereAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Dec 28 1994 17:3716
    Those earlier games where he was tackled in the backfield he didn't
    even have a chance to move before being hit.  This was a combination of
    inexperienced (run-wise) line and qb (Bledsoe is very young, never
    really played in a running offense).
    
    In my observation Butt's strength is hitting the line quickly.  He is
    not "great" in terms of plowing thru hits but that is rare today.  He
    is tough, doesn't fumble and plays 60 minutes.
    
    Now, Russell game them a lot more last year but depending on him was
    always questionable.  I am on record for criticing bill for not
    resigning him; but that was never the criticism of Butts that I see not
    only here but elsewhere.
    
    Just trust me Bob, I pulled tcm's Ranger bacon out and I can do the
    same for Pat's at Pitt.  I just can't do anything about Sunday.
9.3138Sharpe outHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 28 1994 17:3813
Just heard that Sterling Sharpe will miss all of the playoffs and that
his career is in jeopardy.

Turns out Sharpe has some serious neck injury that could lead to
paralysis or worse if'n it's reinjured. He'll take the rest of the year
off, be evaluated in the off season and then make a decision. 

There's been a couple of these things going around, one of which was the
injury to the Hornets' Kenny Gattison who is not expected to play again.

Also, Marshall Faulk was selected the Offensive ROY.

TTom
9.3139METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Dec 28 1994 17:407
>  Just trust me Bob, I pulled tcm's Ranger bacon out

Rght on with the  sereis against NJ. But ......
well let's just say that you were a tad off about the Vancouver series.

The Crazy Met
9.3140ODIXIE::ZOGRANTestudo is still grounded!Wed Dec 28 1994 17:505
    re -.2 -If SHarpe is out GB is going to have a tough time going
    anywhere in the playoffs.  The physcological (and physical) loss of the
    man is going to be tough to overcome, IMHO.
    
    UMDan
9.3141mightHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 28 1994 17:5914
That could happend, UMDan, or it could wake up the rest of the team.

Sharpe has been intermittent this year. I know how good he is and all but
he'd have all world games with 3 TDs, 100+ yds, 10+ catches, etc., and
then the nexted game would be a real no show.

Favre has to understand that he's the man. He has to be the one to get it
done. He'll try to run with Bennett but if'n that doesn't work out, he'll
have to carry the team with his playmaking.

And, of course, the D better understand that they caint count on the  O
to score 30+ points.

TTom
9.3142MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 28 1994 18:2315
    >> So Tommy, I understand your position to be that not only are New 
    >> England, Miami, and Kansas City more capable of matching up with San 
    >> Fran,
    
       My position is ANYBODY BUT PITTSBURG. Plain and simple. They're
       boring, they'll get stomped and the Super Bowl will be anti-climatic
       yet again.
    
    >> but any of those teams also match up well enough with Pittsburgh that 
    >> they will beat them in Three Rivers Stadium in the upcoming playoff 
    >> games?  If so, I'll take a piece of that action...
    
       One lollipop sporting the p-name of my choosing is enough. Of
       course, other arrangements could be made.
    
9.3143MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Wed Dec 28 1994 18:296
    >>My position is ANYBODY BUT PITTSBURG. Plain and simple. They're
    
    	Hey Tommy, buy an H would ya.
    
    
    billl
9.3144CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldWed Dec 28 1994 18:3513
 lollipop huh??? haha  we'll see........

  Sure seems to me that Bam Morris did just fine in Foster's absence. I
  agree as Pitt's running game goes so goes Pitt but I feel that's more
  of a reflection of the offensive line than the back as they've been
  able to effectively run the ball no matter who the back was.

  TTom, Sharpe had most of his bad games early in the year when for some
  reason they were trying to diversify the offense. Once they realized
  that Sharpe was the man and they had to use him they took off.....    

 mike
9.3145we shall seeHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Dec 28 1994 18:436
Yeah, Mike, there's no discounting the value of Sharpe.

I was just profering the idea that the team might just step up in his
absence.

TTom
9.3146MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Dec 29 1994 17:418
    Hope you folks enjoy the playofss and the bowl games this weekend. Just
    realized that I may have a chance to wtch a few minutes here or there
    but that until Monday late afternoon all 3 days are solidly booked.
    
    Have a safe and enjoyable New Year.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.3147Lacquer or Cheese-Whiz???????CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldThu Dec 29 1994 17:450
9.3148SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Thu Dec 29 1994 18:0445
    
    
    
	Not that these numbers mean anything, but here is the final
    strength of schedule results. I find it interested that you have
    4 AFC East teams in the top 10, with the 5th team being #28.
    	Its also interesting to look at where the Playoff teams are
    listed. There are 4 teams in the top 10, 3 in the middle 8, and 5
    in the bottom 10.
    
	Here is the final strength of schedule.

		Opponets
		Records.
		--------

Detroit		142-114
NY Jets		138-118
Cincinnati	138-118
Minnesota	136-120
Buffalo		135-121
Rams		134-122
Patriots	133-123
Houston         133-123
New Orleans	133-123
Miami		132-124
Raiders		131-125
Green Bay	131-125
Philadelphia	130-126
Washington	129-127
Denver		128-128
Chicago		127-129
Kansas City	127-129
Atlanta		126-130
Seattle		125-131
Tampa Bay	125-131
San Diego	124-132
Arizona		120-136
Dallas		120-136
Pittsburgh	119-137
San Francisco	119-137
NY Giants	118-138
Cleveland	116-140
Indianapolis	115-141
9.3149DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake!Thu Dec 29 1994 18:354
    	Waddle would probably say that's why the Jesters lost so many
    games this year, too tough a schedule...
    
    				   /Don
9.3150infoHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Dec 29 1994 19:359
some comings and goings:

 o Bill Parcell - Coach of the Year
 o Tim Bowman - Defensive ROY
 o Flores - sh*t.canned
 o Wade Phillips - gone
 o Warren Moon - getting better

TTom
9.3151Vikes should win their firsted 'off game, beyond that ??CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Thu Dec 29 1994 19:486
| o Warren Moon - getting better

They said lasted week on the pre-game that Moon was almost certain for
the 'offs (as far as the Vikes go, of course).

=Bob=
9.3152MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Fri Dec 30 1994 11:3014
	Coach of the Year:
        
    		1.  BILL PARCELLS, New England     29 votes
    		2.  Bill Cowher, Pittsburgh        25   "
    		3.  Dave Wannstedt, Chicago        22   "
    		4.  George Seifert, San Fran       14   "
    		5.  Bill Belichick, Cleveland       4   "
    		6.  Barry Switzer, Dallas           3   "
    	*	7.  Dan Reeves, NY Giants           1 vote
    
    	* I didn't know 'Saw could cast a vote!
    
    
    	billl
9.3153?WMOIS::BUCKLEY_MFri Dec 30 1994 12:223
    
    	Is SUPERBOWL XXIX being played at Joe Robbie Stadium in 
    	Miami this year?
9.3154MIMS::ROLLINS_RFri Dec 30 1994 14:174
>    	Is SUPERBOWL XXIX being played at Joe Robbie Stadium in 
>    	Miami this year?

	NO, it will be played next year, in January of 1995.
9.3155ideallyHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 30 1994 14:3011
this year vs this season vs nexted year:

Football is confusing about what it calls a year. In January of 95 they
settle the 94 season.

I think someone is trying to tell us that football should be finished by
the end of the real year. With baseball and hockey folding, maybe we can
move football to July and give it through December. Then let basketball
start after the 1st and last through June.

TTom
9.3156MIMS::ROLLINS_RSun Jan 01 1995 00:3612
	My predictions for Saturday's games:

	Green Bay will hold Barry Sanders to negative yards rushing, and
	will hold off Detroit with a first-and-goal with under 2 minutes
	to play to go to 8-0 in the history of the franchise in playoff
	games at Lambeau Field.

	Kansas City and Miami will each score on their first three possessions,
	using all but 22 seconds of the first half in doing so.  Miami
	will score on its next two possessions, and Kansas City's three
	veterans (Montana, Allen, and Thomas) will make colossal mistakes
	in the fourth quarter to seal the Miami victory.
9.3157ROCK::GRONOWSKII JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!Sun Jan 01 1995 01:105
9.3158Sometimes Hindsight Not 20/20!STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Jan 02 1995 15:204
      The past wasn't perfectly predicted!
    
      It was Detroit 1st and 10 at the Green Bay 14 yard line with 
      less than 2 minutes to play.  It was never 1st and goal.
9.3159DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake!Tue Jan 03 1995 15:094
    	Other than the Bears/49ers the other three games should be close
    and entertaining this weekend.
    
    				   /Don
9.3160who's gonna show upHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 03 1995 15:1810
>    	Other than the Bears/49ers the other three games should be close
>    and entertaining this weekend.

So Slasher, you're saying that da Bears will kick 49er butt like they did
up MrT way? I don't know, unlike the gimpy offense o' the Vikings, Young,
Rice, et.al., might be able to score. ;-)

Another possible question: which Cowboys team gonna show up in Dallas?

TTom
9.3161Go Pack! Quick AnalysisSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Tue Jan 03 1995 15:2520
      re: .3159
    
      What with Sharpe out, that is quite a salute to my beloved
      Pack!  I think the spread (10 pts.) is where it belongs,
      but when you're a fan you always have hope.
    
      Smith had 133 yards rushing and 95 receiving in the Thanks-
      giving matchup.  I am hopeful that the Pack can hold him to
      an offensive total of 60 to 70 yards.  That'll be tough with
      the Cowboys o-line.  Also, Dallas will try to do a job on the
      Pack's 'smurf' corners.  Not sure how the Pack can counter that.
      Harper can probably get 2 feet above Buckley.  Thats tough.
    
      One of the more pessimistic outlooks is a Packer defense that
      is just plain too tired in the 4th quarter and begins to just
      get pushed around.  Especially with the high possibility of
      the Pack's offense not having a lot of time of possession, i.e.
      22 rushing yards in the Thanksgiving encounter.
    
                                                    Tony
9.3162HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 15:3010
  Well it appears that once again both #3 wild cards have gone out in the 1st
round.

  Anyone got the stats on the best finish for a #3 wild card? Seems a couple
or few years back the Falcons won the 1st round then lost in Washington the
next week.

  They seem to lose the 1st game most the time.

  George
9.3163TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Tue Jan 03 1995 16:1615
    
    
    
    
>  Well it appears that once again both #3 wild cards have gone out in the 1st
>round.
    
    	The Chicago Bears (#3 Wildcard Team in the NFC) beat the Vikings,
    the last time I checked....
    
    
    JimH
    
    
    
9.3164HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 16:2313
RE<<< Note 9.3163 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

>    	The Chicago Bears (#3 Wildcard Team in the NFC) beat the Vikings,
>    the last time I checked....
    
  Wasn't that a wild card game?

  I thought the #3 division winners hosted the #3 wild cards on Saturday and
the regular wild card games were on Sunday.

  At least that's the way they did it in the past.

  George
9.3165But "mediocre" Bryce Paup had a pretty good game Saturday...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Tue Jan 03 1995 16:3511
re: Pack

Their rushing game looked better against the Lions.  Bennett
is doing OK, but Cobb is still nothing.  

As a Packer fan, I was hoping that the next matchup would
be with just about anyone except Dallas.  No matter who 
they put on the field, the Cowboys seem to have the Pack's
number.

=Bob=
9.3166TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Tue Jan 03 1995 16:4313
    
    
  >Wasn't that a wild card game?
  >
  >I thought the #3 division winners hosted the #3 wild cards on Saturday and
  >the regular wild card games were on Sunday.
    
    	Nope. Viks were the NFC Central Champs, the Bears the #3 wildcard
    team.
    
    JimH
    
    
9.3167HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 16:5711
RE<<< Note 9.3166 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

>    	Nope. Viks were the NFC Central Champs, the Bears the #3 wildcard
>    team.
    
  Ok, so the Bears are still alive and I believe Atlanta managed a 2nd round
loss to the Redskins a few years back.

  Any better finishes for a #3 wild card team?

  George
9.3168SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Tue Jan 03 1995 18:087
    
    	The year the Patriots went to the Super Bowl. I believe they were
    the lowest seed in the playoffs. They won games @Jets, @Raiders, @Miami
    to advance to the Super Bowl. I believe there were only 2 wildcard
    teams instead of 3.
    
    Ron
9.3169HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 18:3412
  Yes I realize that. They were the #2 wild card. 

  I'm particularly interested in the #3 wild card. I've noticed that since it
was instituted a few years ago, #3 wild cards have done very poorly, usually
losing in the 1st round. 

  Funny thing is that I wouldn't have expected that. With the unbalanced
schedules and weak divisions it seems that very weak #3 division winners would
be fairly common and that #3 wild cards should be up around .500 in the 1st
round but it doesn't seem to be the case. 

  George
9.3170DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake!Tue Jan 03 1995 18:555
    	The #3 wild card team was added so the NFL could siphon more
    money from the networks by offering them two more "playoff" games.
    Not surprising they've done so poorly.
    
    				  /Don
9.3171< .500 makes senseMETSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Jan 03 1995 19:086
Even if the #3 wildcard plays a weak division winner, the odds are fairly
good that they at best are about even with the division winner. Home field
would then give the division winner the extra edge they need to win the game.

The Crazy Met
9.3172Current system could be improvedAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Jan 04 1995 15:1929
    Tcm is right.  There was very little difference in #3 wildcard vs #2,#3
    nor between wildcard and Division champ (Miami and Pats had same
    record).
    
    The difference often comes with home-field and in many cases with
    top-heavy dominance.  Given some very good Patriot teams in late 70s
    and only two appearances in playoffs I like to see more teams in the
    dance.
    
    K.C. was #3 and even without home-field needed bad luck and
    questionable officiating to lose.
    
    But I'd stay with the 6 teams but possibly consider a playoff scenario
    instead of the wierd tie breaker rules.  Of if 8 teams qualify pre-tb
    then go with 8 instead of 6.
    
    Also, four central teams shouldn't have qualified, only three + the
    Giants.  An elimination of divisional ties should have preceded the
    final tie-breaker.
    
    And finally, Conference record merely is the reverse of non-conference
    which says wins vs AFC (by nfc and vv) count less.  Since the idea is
    to beat the other conference these perhaps should count more or at
    least the same.  Beating the Browns and losing to Detroit cost the
    Giants the playoffs which is ironic (vv and they get in, Right?).
    
    b
    
    
9.3173SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensWed Jan 04 1995 18:313
    Is this the first time the NFC East hasn't had a wildcard?
    
    brews
9.3174WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCanes and Hoyas,Canes and HoyasWed Jan 04 1995 18:438
    
    
    WCs started in 78.
    
    In 87 they had no WC as Minny and NO were the 2!
       88                   Minny and the Rams.
    
    I believe thats it!!
9.3175METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Jan 04 1995 18:4610
Are you sure about 1978?? There were WC before that but only 1. East
could likely not have had one each year that the 1 WC system was
in place.
Dallas in the mid 1970's got to the SB as a WC before losing to 
the Steelers. They beat Minnesota on a Hail Mary pass - Pearson should
have been called for interference - and then won the NFC Championship
game the following week against ????

The Crazy Met
9.3176WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCanes and Hoyas,Canes and HoyasThu Jan 05 1995 11:307
    
    
    
       Woops your right welcher I just was looking at the WC game itself!
    
    
    Chap
9.3177MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Jan 05 1995 12:3710
>    WCs started in 78.
>    
>    In 87 they had no WC as Minny and NO were the 2!
>       88                   Minny and the Rams.
>    
>    I believe thats it!!

     As mentioned, in the pre-wild card game days, Detroit (1970) and
     Chicago (1977) made the playoffs as the only wild card team.  Note that
     in no year did the NFC West send the sole wild card team.
9.3178Carroll fired by Jets?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Jan 05 1995 13:516
Heard on the radio coming to work that they done put Pete Carroll outta
his and the Jets fans' misery. Fired is what I heard.

Any confirmations? Baptisms?

TTom
9.3179METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Jan 05 1995 15:423
1PM news conference. Supposed to name Kotite as the new head coach.

The Crazy Met
9.3180Kotite for Carroll? Who won?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Jan 05 1995 15:475
Dumping Carroll and signing Kotite?

This is indeed something for the die hard fans to celebrate.

TTom
9.3181GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Thu Jan 05 1995 16:184
    I feel bad for all of the Jets fans.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.3182THE END IS NEAR!HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Jan 05 1995 16:2513
Just when you thought it mighta bottomed out...

The National Enquirer, yessir that specious rag, is negotiating with the
Tampa Bay Buccaneers about buying the team. The magazine owners and
executives are said to be meeting the the Bucs trustees.

In other signs that may portend the Apocolypse now:

   o	A girl is in the finals of the Punt, Pass & Kick contest

   o	Wayne Fontes was given a 2 year extension.

TTom
9.3183A marriage made in hellMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRThu Jan 05 1995 16:465
The National Enquirer and the NFL.  Maybe it'll be renamed the NEFL.

And you thought the NFL couldn't get sleazier if it tried.

Steve
9.3184what a dunceUSCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jan 05 1995 17:217
>   o	Wayne Fontes was given a 2 year extension.

I think I speak for all Packer fans when I say:



		Y-I-P-P-E-E !!
9.3185more and othersHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Jan 05 1995 17:2310
What I don't understand was all this talk about not being satisfied with
just making the playoffs but actually wanting to win one of 'em.

So what happens? The Lions lose and give Fontes a contract extension.

Also, in case it hasn't been pointed out somewhere, Jerry Jones has given
Barry Switzer a_extension. This before Switzer coaches his firsted NFL
playoff game, much less win one.

TTom
9.3186CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldThu Jan 05 1995 17:244
 good YESMEN are hard to find TTom.........

 ;^)
9.3187or is it pawn to king-4?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Jan 05 1995 17:255
re: YESMEN.

Didn't they do the original version of Louiee Louiee?

TTom
9.3188USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jan 05 1995 17:269
>Dumping Carroll and signing Kotite?

Kotite is a former Jets assistant coach.  He's well liked in NY, and is
a native NY'er/Brooklynite.

I'll put it in here now:  The Jets will be 8-8, MINIMUM.  That's an
immediate +2 before he makes any personnel changes.  And even with
an aging Esiason, he'll be much happier to not have to deal with
that jerk in Philly.
9.3189PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingThu Jan 05 1995 17:428
                    <<< Note 9.3188 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>I'll put it in here now:  The Jets will be 8-8, MINIMUM.  That's an
    
    I'll counter that by saying the Jets will be fighting the Bills for the
    AFC East cellar next season.
    
    Mark.
9.3190SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensThu Jan 05 1995 18:013
    where'd JoJ-not when you really want to hear from him?
    
    brews
9.3191DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake!Thu Jan 05 1995 18:064
    Hey Brews, JoJ is now JoS(teelers).  No flies on him.  Two games
    I like a lot this weekend are Green Bay and Miami with the points.
    
    				  /Don
9.3192Mediocre coaches are easy to find...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Thu Jan 05 1995 18:102
I thought Kotite and Carroll were the same pserson.  Has
anyone seen them together?
9.3193SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensThu Jan 05 1995 18:244
    
    I forgot that Jo* was the original Wardlevane, even before TC*.
    
    brews
9.3194Coaches/Sander-SmithLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Jan 05 1995 18:3819
      I'm shocked by the Fontes signing.  I thought he'd be gone.
      I don't know what to make of Kotite.  Seemed like he over-
      achieved like crazy for awhile there.
    
      I've heard some "Smith is better than Sanders" remarks lately
      following his -1 yard.  How pathetic!  I talked to Mike Childs
      about it.  He mentioned seeing comparative films of the two backs
      and the times Smith wouldn't even see contact until ~8 yards
      downfield.  What Sanders would do under such circumstances is too
      scary to even think about!  
    
      I saw the Packer game.  He was typically met by 3 to 5 Packers
      behind the line of scrimmage coming from all directions save behind
      him.  He never had a chance except one time, following a reception,
      Wayne Simmons held on to him for dear life and managed to get him
      out of bounds.  I almost had a heart attack as only one Packer had
      hands on him.
    
                                                        Tony
9.3195another winnerHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Jan 05 1995 19:2414
one more for the you aint make it up any screwier.

Jeff Fisher, interim coach of the Hapless Oilers, who directed said same
Oilers to a grand total of 1 win, has been given a 3 year contract
rumored to be worth around a mil. Exact terms were not released,
presumably to protect the not guilty due to insanity. Bud Adams has found
his man, for now at least.

I was thinking about Kotite and the Panthers' penalties. I think the
league should fine anyone talking to Kotite about coaching and severely
fine anyone who actually hires him. Tell that Hess fella to fork over
some big bucks. 

TTom
9.3196Feeling daring.WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Jan 05 1995 21:584
    
    I predict an all-NFC Central NFC Championship game.
    
    - Sean
9.3197GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Thu Jan 05 1995 22:488
    I would be amazed if Kotite sniffed at a .500 record with the Jets. He
    will also not be so popular in NYC after he pulls some of the bonehead
    stuff he did in Philadelphia, with personnel, playcalling and clock
    management. Mr. Hess will be dead before Kotite does anything with that
    team.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
9.3198good luckHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 06 1995 13:3411
>                              -< Feeling daring. >-
>    
>    I predict an all-NFC Central NFC Championship game.
>    
>    - Sean

Hop a flight to Vegas. Play the odds on this one for 20 bucks and
if'n it hits, you could pay for the trip. San Fran is 11:1 and rising.
Dallas is 5: or 6:1. Go to Harrah's and they'll have odds on this parlay.

TTom
9.3199GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Fri Jan 06 1995 13:425
    Great headline in the NY Post today, regading the Kotite hiring.
    
    DUMB AND DUMBER
    Jets fire one loser, hire another
    
9.3200Boomer part of problem not solutionAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberFri Jan 06 1995 14:406
    re. Esiason,
    	Kotite has to move him to backup at best.  He fades badly during
    the season and I'd guess has too many non football things on his mind
    (in his case healthy concern for his son).
    
    billte
9.3201HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 09 1995 12:238
  By Saturday night, 5 of the 6 teams remaining were division winners.

  Had the 49'ers not pulled their 1st team in the last regular game on Monday
night then Green Bay would have won the N.F.C. Central and all 6 teams would
have been division winners. 

  Not a banner year for the wild cards,
  George
9.3202MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Mon Jan 09 1995 13:0110
    Now that the Final Four have been decided, I find it interesting that
    they were the two best teams from each division (first week bye).
    Kinda shows how meaningless it can be to make the NFL playoffs as a
    wildcard team.
    
    I'm sure someone out there has the stats that show how often this 
    has happened.
    
    
    billl
9.3203DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Jan 09 1995 13:0411
    	I thought the officiating (sic) during the Miami-SD game was
    	terrible.
    
    	If I were commissioner, I would do a couple of things to change
    	NFL football:
    
    		1. Instant replay (handled like timeouts)
    
    		2. Get rid of the face masks and hard sided helmets
    
    	Scott
9.3204MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Mon Jan 09 1995 13:198
    It sounds like I'm in the minority here, but I think better trained
    officials are the answer, not instant replay.
    
    Wasn't Shula one of the ones on the Rules Committee who was very
    much against IR?  I wonder how he feels now.
    
    
    billl
9.3205and full timeHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 13:2211
How about full-time and trained.

One of the problems that officials have in both footballa and basketball
is that the players are so fast that a_outta position ref is doing
everything he can to just get to the play. They don't have time to
actually watch what the hail is going on.

The worsted calls were the SD-Miami game. The Jackson "forward pass" and
the Means TD that shouldn't have been are notable examples.

TTom
9.3206PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS-1994 AFC Central ChampsMon Jan 09 1995 13:2817
    I'll tell ya how to make the officials better.
    
    Make them subject ot a review after the game by the league.  Then, when
    found to be wrong, they'd suffer a severe penalty.
    
    Like say, the guy who blew the call on the TD late in the game, he
    loses his little finger.  No questions asked, just the guilty verdict,
    then the "executioner", say the league hires Jack Lambert fer the job,
    comes out wif his TV knife and carves away the extremity.  Then, when
    the official no longer has enough fingers left to yank the ol yellow
    flag out, they make em umpires fer baseball, wherein they start to lose
    toes fer bad calls.
    
    JMHO
    
    JaKe
    
9.3207Poor callsBUMP::MMARLANDMon Jan 09 1995 13:3627
One of the factors not considered yet for the poor officiating is the new rules
It seems the NFl has a new penalty each year. A few years back it was "in the
grasp". I remember every little contact on the QB led to In the grasp. Then
I rememebr it was holding o nthe TE down fields. This year it was pass 
interference. The rules are so complex yet at the same time leave no room for
judement calls. It's now very black and white, there little room for officials
to make a judement call.

As for the SD-Miami game, it was horrendous. Means was OB on one score, yet it 
looked like he got the ball to the cone on the 4th down play.

The Jackson play boggles my mind, how to you get 2nd and 5, it's like giving 
them 5 on 1st down, it should have been 1st and 15.


Perhaps the most boneheaded play I've seen in sometime.

Well if Pittsburg wins, then history will be made for one team will get the 
ring for the Thumb.


mm




 
9.3208just grade 'emHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 13:387
You don't have to resort to severe penalties.

They should have full-time, professional refs that are graded at the end
of the game. If'n a ref caint make or keep the grade sufficient for the
NFL, then send him down to that arena stuff.

TTom
9.3209CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 09 1995 13:3927
>    Make them subject ot a review after the game by the league.  Then, when
>    found to be wrong, they'd suffer a severe penalty.
    
They are, every week of the season, plus they take a big rules test every
Thursday.

Problem is, you've got good ol' boy Jerry Seeman (head of officials) backing
up his guys despite their shortcomings.   After the Detroit-Giants game
were a couple of blown calls sealed Detroit's victory, calls which were
at best, controversial, he comes out and says it was one of the best
officiated games all season.  Of course he wouldn't address the utterly
blown Herman Moore knee DOWN call that set up Detroits winning score in OT.

So, a review is no good if the reviewer sucks.


Also, whoever made the point about the players getting faster and faster
is right.   Over the last twenty-thirty years, players abilities and
speed have improved (this is consistent with all of athletics really)
but the officials have not.  You're not telling me a 45 year old
man is gonna be quick enough to get in position to see what needs to be
seen when two 25 year old STUDS are sweating off testosterone faster
than the ref can pee.....


'Saw    

9.3210WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCanes and Hoyas,Canes and HoyasMon Jan 09 1995 14:3510
    
    
    
         Also on the 4th down play where he fumbled onto the pylon and
    Miami was given the ball at the 1? That should have been a touchback
    and Miami's ball at the 20? The rule states if the Offens fumbles the
    ball and it goes out of the endzone it is a touchback!!!
    
    
    Chap
9.3211Happens in every sportAYOV27::FW_TEMP01John Hussey - Exiled in jocko landMon Jan 09 1995 14:3910
This happens in every sport.  Basically the ref has to make a decision instantly
and may or may not be in the right position.

The commentator has 20,000 different camera angles and 60 hours in which to
replay it in one frame at a time.  It generally evens itself out in the long
run (even Giants fans might admit this).  Its a game - if the players were
perfect think how boring it would.

Give these guys credit for the 95+ out of 100 they get it right and the
commentator is wrong.
9.3212what network does the SB?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 14:4612
And speaking of commentators, even with the 20,000 (sic) camera angles,
it's amazing how bad they blow it, too.

Sometimes, it sounds like they're killing time 'cause they haven't a clue
as to what is happening. We're talking basics here, like down and
distance.

Who has the Super Bowl thised year, NBC? Does that mean we have to suffer
through Enberg and Trumpy? And how 'bout them studio shows they do with
Ditka and Gibbs. Can anyone make it more boring?

TTom
9.3213CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 09 1995 14:4821
>         Also on the 4th down play where he fumbled onto the pylon and
>    Miami was given the ball at the 1? That should have been a touchback
>    and Miami's ball at the 20? The rule states if the Offens fumbles the
>    ball and it goes out of the endzone it is a touchback!!!
    
Pylon is out of bounds and I believe the ball is NOT considered to have
been IN the end zone.   When a RB is running, dives, touches the pylon
with the ball and maintains possession, his team gets the ball at the
one.

If the pylon was considered to be "in the end zone", the ball breaking
the plane would give priority to the TD.

But the pylon is out of bounds....

I heard it discussed on the radio, and they said it was the correct call....


'Saw


9.3214CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 09 1995 14:495
I wish ABC and NBC would take a cue from FOX and ESPN and put the score up
in the corner......


'Saw
9.3215not perfectHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 14:514
Fox had a bit of a glitch in the Cowboys game. Green Bay kicked a FG to
make it 7-3 but Fox kept it at 7-0.

TTom
9.3216WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCanes and Hoyas,Canes and HoyasMon Jan 09 1995 14:5210
    
    
       I believe the SB is on ABC this year!
    
        I think your wrong on that Saw if a player touches the pylon while
    in possession of the ball it is a TD. I've seen it ruled that way many
    times?.
    
    
    Chap
9.3217outta boundsHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 14:556
The pylon is outta bounds.

That doesn't mean that the refs might call it differently. But bad calls
don't change the fack that the pylon anything but outta bounds.

TTom
9.3218CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Jan 09 1995 14:578
 I second the ABC superbowl coverage. of course with my record for facts 
 I wouldn't exactly take it to the bank.........

 abc and nbc are probably afraid to admit that fox has come up with a great
 inovation and that's why they don't post the score and clock like fox.

 mike
9.3219MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Mon Jan 09 1995 15:0111
    I think ABC has the SB.  That'll mean the MNF jamokes.  I can hardly
    wait!
    
    re score/time display:
    
    I couldn't agree more.  I find it irratating to tune into a game and
    have to sit and wait for the announcers to get around to mentioning
    the score and time left.
    
    
    billl
9.3220Correct callILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersMon Jan 09 1995 15:0612
	Re: Means fourth down fumble ..

	The reason it was NOT a touchback was because it was a FOURTH down
	play. You are not allowed to fumble FORWARD on a fourth down play, 
	the ball is marked at the spot of the fumble. If it had been a 
	second or thrid down play, then it would have been a touchback, Miami 
	ball at the 20 yard line instead of the 1 yard line.

	Ironically, it was the famous Raider fumble in Jack Murphy Stadium that
	caused the introduction of this rule.

	Vinny
9.3221just say NO to Deon!MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Mon Jan 09 1995 15:2215
    I now hope that both the Steelers and the 9ers advance to the SB.
    Also on my wish list is that Deon "the dancing fool" Saunders 
    intercepts O'Donnell and Dermonti Dawson makes the bone crushing 
    tackle.  Then the only dancing will be the stars circling that
    dweeb's head.
    
    I rarely wish others ill health (my MIL is an exception), but I
    am so sick of seeing Saunders' antics when he does what he is 
    being paid to do, make tackles and intercept passes.  You'd think
    that each occurence was the winning tackle/interception in the SB.
    
    Better yet, maybe the Cowboys will say the Steelers the trouble.
    
    
    billl
9.3222HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 09 1995 15:3617
  There was an interesting piece about Deon Sanders on one of the games. One of
the 49'er line backers was saying that he didn't like the idea that Sanders was
coming to the team because of his attitude, gold chains, etc but once he got
there he found out that Sanders was a decent guy. Now they get along great. 

  Sanders gets bad press but I see no evidence that he slacks off or doesn't
give 100% and I've never heard his team mates complain about him being on
their team in either baseball or football. And quarterbacks don't seem to go
anywhere near him if they can avoid it. He's a true NFL all-star who deserves
to be in the pro-bowl.

  And as for this candy-ass nonsense about him acting up when he scores,
there's a way teams can stop that which works every time. Just tackle him
before he gets into the endzone. If they don't, then they deserve what they
get. 

  George 
9.3223SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Mon Jan 09 1995 15:407
    
    	The Keith Jackson illegal forward pass now makes sense to me. It
    was 1st and 20 from the 15. Jackson was at the 35 when he "passed"
    the ball. So a 5 yrd penalty from the spot (35), put the ball on
    the 30. Which made it 2nd and 5 because of the lose of down.
    
    Ron
9.3224CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Jan 09 1995 15:5512
Hey George what game are you watching? Sanders doesn't give 100% when 
tackling or when the Niners are in zone. I don't care if his teammates
like him or not. I don't and sure seems like better than 1/2 of the
Western civilation doesn't either. He wants to celebrate and make an
ass out himself that's fine with me. I just feel the man is extremely
over-rated and the most undeseving choice of Defensive Player of the Year
in a long time.

If I had a vote it would have been Haley, Lloyd or White........

mike
9.3225MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jan 09 1995 16:048
    
       The next bone-crunching hit that Deion makes will be his 
      first. He's the best cover man in the league - maybe ever.
      But after watching him this season I can understand why he 
      used to throw forearms to the head when trying to tackle.
      It's because he can't tackle. I'd like to see Dallas throw
      the buttonhook to Irvin and let Deion try and take him down.
      
9.3226Don't need to sacrifice an INT to accomplish this, thoughEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jan 09 1995 16:0810
> And as for this candy-ass nonsense about him acting up when he scores,
> there's a way teams can stop that which works every time. Just tackle him
> before he gets into the endzone.
    
    I believe that was Billl's suggestion.  Clean, hard and devastatingly 
    effective...
    
    glenn
    
9.3227HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 09 1995 16:386
  Deon's a defensive back, not a linebacker. He's rated on coverage, not on
bone breaking tackles.

  The 49'ers have others guys that seem to handle that end of the game.

  George
9.3228one fanHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 16:409
Say what you want about Deon but he obviously has the respect of the
players.

Anyone notice how many time the Bears threw his way? How 'bout 0!

Deon profiles but with few exceptions, he's not taunting anyone. The
worst thing you could say about him is that he's having a good time.

TTom
9.3229CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 09 1995 16:4612
>  Deon's a defensive back, not a linebacker. He's rated on coverage, not on
>bone breaking tackles.
>
>  The 49'ers have others guys that seem to handle that end of the game.

Except for sweeps and running plays to the perimeter of the defense.

One of the coolest plays in football is seeing a cornerback play matador
against a sweeping guard.....


'Saw
9.3230Great cover guy granted but CB have to hit tooAD::HEATHDawgs Rule Pats SipMon Jan 09 1995 17:5611
    
    
    re about Deion and defensive player of the year...
    
      I was wathcing Sports Reporters yesterday and as much as
    I hate Mike Lupica he had a great line...
    
      How can Deion Sanders win Defensive player of the Year?  He
    didn't tackle anybody.
    
    Jerry
9.3231Sanders the reason?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 18:0317
Someone has to get the credit for the defensive improvement for the best
team in football.

Sanders seems to be getting this nod from players, fans and those that
vote for such awards.

Mike Lupica is a_idiot. I'm a fairly faithful viewer of ESPN but when he
comes on, I go to another station.

Also, 

>             <<< Note 9.3230 by AD::HEATH "Dawgs Rule Pats Sip" >>>
                                            ^^^^^^^^^^

This may need some minor modification ;-).

TTom
9.3232MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jan 09 1995 18:185
      I agree that Lupica is preening little self-important idiot
     but I've heard as many people credit rookie Bryant Taylor from
     ND as Deion for the improvement in SF's defense. I'd say that
     some combination of the two is what's done it. Somehow, I don't
     think it'll be enough to stop Dallas from three-peating.
9.3233HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 09 1995 18:459
  Well the Dion / Irving matchup may not be the thing that swings this contest.
The question is, can the Cowboys beat the 49'ers without Emmit Smith?

  To their credit losing Smith didn't slow them up this weekend but then the
Packers seemed to mail in their performance. Playing the 49'ers in Candlestick
will be a whole different thing.

  49'ers by a touchdown,
  George
9.3234MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jan 09 1995 19:017
    
    >> The question is, can the Cowboys beat the 49'ers without 
    >> Emmit Smith?
    
       The answer of course is "No!". But Dallas won't even try it 
       without Smith. The real question is can Dallas beat the Niners 
       with Smith being less than 100%?
9.3235MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Jan 09 1995 19:028
>       The answer of course is "No!". But Dallas won't even try it 
>       without Smith. The real question is can Dallas beat the Niners 
>       with Smith being less than 100%?

        Another big question, will the supposedly muddy field (rain all week?)
        affect Emmitt Smith ?  How will it affect SF coverage of the Dallas
	receivers, and vice-versa ?  Will Troy get hurt planting his weak
	wheels on bad turf ?  Will Steve Young be a threat to run ?
9.3236Bryant Young?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 19:1710
Tommy,

Do you mean Bryant Young? Goodun, there. I agree that he has really helped. 

It's almost amazing that a team as good as San Francisco has several
rookies that start and contribute. William Floyd is approaching Moose
Johnston type performance at fullback. Doug Brien had no problem helping
Mike Cofer move on to his nexted career.

TTom
9.3237BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredMon Jan 09 1995 19:385

	Chuck Knox canned as coach of the Rams.

	Kevin
9.3238HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 09 1995 19:4210
  So what's the story on the Rams?

  Seems I heard a week or so ago that an announcement for them moving to
St Louis was due any minute but I haven't heard anything since.

  Since the Pats are playing the NFC West next year, who knows, they may be
going to St Louis after all, even if it's only for one game. 

  :*)}
  George
9.3239supposedly a done dealHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 09 1995 19:456
They're tlkaing like it's a done deal.

Even though they're headed to St. Louis, they'll still be in the NFC
West. A fack not missed by the Panthers and their fans.

TTom
9.3240HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 09 1995 20:029
  So this means that the 49'ers will be the only team in the NFC West that
are actually in the western part of the country, right?

  You know rather than jumbling up divisions and schedules, maybe they should
just change the name of the NFC West to the NFC South. The teams are not
really west of much in the NFL sense but they are all south of the 40th
parallel.

  George
9.3241SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Mon Jan 09 1995 20:037
    
    	Well if Chuck Knox was fired as head coach of the Rams today. Then
    it is a done deal and the Rams are going to St. Louis. The owner
    Georgia F. (?) said that Knox would coach the Rams if they stayed in
    LA.
    
    Ron
9.3242(8^)*PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS-1994 AFC Central ChampsMon Jan 09 1995 22:305
    The Rams are too cheap to pay Knox's moving expenses to St. Louis,
    that's why he was canned.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3243METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Jan 10 1995 14:113
Isn't SF just on the 40th parallel??

The Crazy Met
9.3244BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Jan 10 1995 14:1912
>      <<< Note 9.3243 by METSNY::francus "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>
>
>Isn't SF just on the 40th parallel??
>
>The Crazy Met


	Hey TCM, according to my map, SF is just south of the 38th parallel,
	so it's definately south of the 40th.

	Kevin

9.3245METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Jan 10 1995 14:323
Thanks! What about NYC?

The Crazy Met
9.3246BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Jan 10 1995 14:4011
>      <<< Note 9.3245 by METSNY::francus "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>
>
>Thanks! What about NYC?
>
>The Crazy Met

	Looks like it is just south of the 41st parallel.  BTW, I've got maps
	of the world, the US, and Colorado hanging on my wall.  I don't know 
	this stuff off the toppa my haid.

	Kevin
9.3247philly is right on 40thAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeTue Jan 10 1995 14:541
    
9.3248more underclassmenHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 10 1995 15:0112
The lists of underclassmen turning pro is growing. They have until
tomorrow to declare for the draft. So far:

Ty Law, DB, Michigan
Curtis Johnson, RB, No Carolina
Greg Black, DB, No Carolina
Bobby Taylor, DB, Notre Dame
Ki-Jana Carter, RB, Penn St

And of course, Salaam already previously declared.

TTom
9.3249WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCanes and Hoyas,Canes and HoyasTue Jan 10 1995 15:034
    
    
    
       No Warren Sapp yet??
9.3250him too and moreHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 10 1995 15:081
9.3251It won't even be as close as the final scoreSTRATA::GARRYDallas Cowboys shooting for 3-peatThu Jan 12 1995 23:5114
    Well the big game is almost here so I'll put my prediction in for the 
    SF-Dallas game..........
    Dallas 27  SF 14..............
    
    SF can thank the books in Vegas for the number Dallas is gonna do on
    them............slapping them in the face by making them such big dogs
    theres no way that line should be more than 3 for home field
    advantage.....even Jimmy Johnson couldn't get them more motivated with
    his words of wisdom and we know how good he was............
    
    3 in a row and the first to win 5....................
    
    
    Tom
9.3252ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS, best in the AFCFri Jan 13 1995 10:594
9.3253PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingFri Jan 13 1995 12:003
    Pittsburg(h) will cover.  SF will win, but won't cover.
    
    Mark.
9.32552 good games, both games go over with the dogs'BIGQ::WESTFri Jan 13 1995 12:1512
    
    the DOGS look real good on Sunday.....thats underdogs not the Dawgs
    from Cleveland....hoping for 2 good games....
    
    SF 27  Dallas 27  its into the second OT period.....close game!!
    Emmitt is really healthy, Switzer pulled a fake injury vs GB..
    
    Pittsburg  20  San Diego  17  Pitts "D" holds off the final drive.
    Bam Morris has 2 TDs as they run Morris and Foster in the same
    backfield to stun SD game plan.....John L plays tight end after
    Eric Green goes down again.....
                       
9.3256CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldFri Jan 13 1995 12:156
Karen,  quit talking about Hal's heroes like that!!!!!!!! 

love that p-name. who had the pleasure of hanging that on him???

mike
9.3257Two close gamesTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Fri Jan 13 1995 13:005
    San Diego 16, Pittsburgh 13 - Carney wins it in OT.
    
    San Fran 31, Dallas 27 - 'Boys don't go down without a fight.
    
    NAZZ
9.3258dog-over; favHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 13 1995 13:0913
Nazz,

Is that your real pick or is it a reverse negative mojo type pick where
you think the Steelers will win and then you think that if'n you think
that it aint gonna happen?

In any case, I like the San Diego-Pitt game to be close and surpisingly
high scoring. Not like the pseudo lasted game they played but it'll be
a_over. San Francisco will cover easy if'n they win the game. A close
game probably favors Dallas. Who knows it may come down to Brien and
Boniol. But I don't think so.

TTom 
9.3259HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jan 13 1995 13:256
    Pittsburgh 31, San Diego 10, - Humphries spends afternoon sitting in mud.
    
    San Fran 27, Dallas 17 - Bump in road to 49'er superbowl rings.
    
    George
9.3260could happenHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 13 1995 13:286
>    Pittsburgh 31, San Diego 10, - Humphries spends afternoon sitting in mud.

George that's gonna be a bit hard, what with Three Rivers having a carpet
and all. 

TTom
9.3261HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jan 13 1995 13:294
  Through the carpet, through the concrete, through any rock, down to mud.

  It won't be pretty,
  George
9.3262been there?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 13 1995 13:465
I hear you.

In fack, dint a Brownie try to do this using Terry Bradshaw's haid, once?

TTom
9.3263ROCK::GRONOWSKISTEELERS, best in the AFCFri Jan 13 1995 13:512
9.3264carpets are fer sissiesHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 13 1995 13:580
9.3265Does Quebec have the sports lottery too?AKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeFri Jan 13 1995 14:169
    As I recall the Ontario Lottery requires a minimum of 3 teams parlayed
    and in football they have to win by 3 (even the dog).  I kind of like
    the dogs here as a parlay but I'd still need a 3rd team.
    
    Now in cases like this on the Ontario system you would find the best
    favorite in the world to win by 3.  The only other sport going is
    baskets (also need win by 3 I think).
    
    But I'm not going all the way to Canada to get this down anyway...
9.3266Underclassmen in the draftILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersFri Jan 13 1995 15:2537
NFL Draft Early Entries
The players who have been granted special eligibility to enter the 
1995 NFL draft on April 22-23 with position and school:

   Derrick Alexander, de, Florida State
   Toney Bates, de, Iowa
   Greg Black, dt, North Carolina
   Blake Brockermeyer, ot, Texas
   Devin Bush, db, Florida State
   Ki-Jana Carter, rb, Penn State
   Shannon Clavelle, dt, Colorado
   Lee DeRamus, wr, Wisconsin
   Brian Easter, lb, Arizona State
   Brian Fitzgerald, rb, North Carolina State
   Elliott Fortune, dt, Georgia Tech
   Che Foster, rb, Michigan
   Profail Grier, rb, Utah State
   Brandell Jackson, rb, Baylor
   Jack Jackson, wr, Florida
   Trezelle Jenkins, ot, Michigan
   Curtis Johnson, rb, North Carolina
   Greg Landry, g, Boston College
   Ty Law, db, Michigan
   Mike Mamula, de, Boston College
   Curtis Martin, rb, Pittsburgh
   Lovell Pinkney, wr, Texas
   Craig Powell, lb, Ohio State
   Brian Robinson, db, Auburn
   Rashaan Salaam, rb, Colorado
   Warren Sapp, dt, Miami
   James Stewart, rb, Miami
   Korey Stringer, ot, Ohio State
   Lorenzo Styles, lb, Ohio State
   Bobby Taylor, db, Notre Dame
   Johnny Thomas, wr, Arizona State
   Tamarick Vanover, wr, Florida State
   John Walsh, qb, Brigham Young
9.3267some gooduns thereHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 13 1995 15:3110
Perhaps the big news is that Simeon Rice is *NOT* going pro. He's decided
to stay at Illinois. Rice had been projected in about everyone's top 5
and Mel Kiper had him as the overall #1 pick going to the Panthers.

Right now, I would think that there's several of these that either
J'ville or Charlotte would want. Sapp has been mentioned often. So has
Walsh. Either Ki-Jana or RushOn would be nice to see, too.

TTom
9.3268SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Fri Jan 13 1995 15:5916
    
    	They should trade the picks for players and picks. ONE player
    isn't going to make these teams. They can build a nucleaus this
    year. Then chances are both teams will be battling for the #1 for
    the next couple of years anyways. Once you have the nucleaus
    draft the QB, DL, RB with the #1/#2 pick in a year or two.
    	For football I would build the team by getting players and
    draft picks. For the sole reason that football is a team of 22
    players. This is why I say ONE player won't make a difference. If
    it was basketball or some other sport. With only 5 or 6 players playing
    at any given time. Then YES take the best player and don't trade
    the pick.
    
    Ron
    
    Ron
9.3269Different playing fieldILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersFri Jan 13 1995 16:1423
	I agree with Ron that ONE player will not make the difference
	for the expansion teams, it takes 20+ players to make a good team.

	But I think that with the new rules in place (all the extra draft
	picks the expansion teams get), the salary cap (over payed players
	being exposed/waived/traded) and free agency that an expansion team 
	can contend for the playoffs in as little as three years.

	Why do I beleive this? Look at Dallas under Jimmy Johnson. They
	went from laughing stock (1-15) to the top of the heap in the
	same time frame. How did they do it? By stockpiling HIGH draft 
	choices and making smart player personell moves.

	The expansion teams already have a stockpile of draft choices,
	they will be able to pick up some decent players through the
	expansion draft, and they may be able to grab a few quality
	players through free agency.

	I can't speak for Carolina, (since they don't have a coach in place yet)
	but I would not be surprised to see Tom Coughlin have Jacksonville 
	in the playoffs before 1999.

	Vinny
9.3270how bout this???BSS::MENDEZFri Jan 13 1995 16:225
    Think maybe either Carolina or Jacksonville would be interested
    in Ricky Watters and SF's 1st round pick for their 1st round pick?
    
    Frank 49er Mendez
    
9.3271They won't spend if they don't have toAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeFri Jan 13 1995 16:368
    Both expansion franchises will play it smart by postioning themselves
    to grab the low picks in the drafts the first few years while keeping a
    low payroll and profiting from their expansion status to draw the first
    few years.
    
    Then about year three when the novelty wears off they spend the money
    and go for the playoffs.  This will tie in with the expiration of
    Coughlin's contract.
9.32722 and outHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 13 1995 16:5511
Don't look for either of the firsted coaches for J'ville and Charlotte to
be around when any success happens.

With the pressures that will be on them, plus the continuing
merry-go-round of the NFL hirings and firings of coaches, both teams will
be ever vigilant for a new and better coach.

Besides, firing these guys will make everyone think they're making
progress.

TTom
9.3273PATRIOTS IN 1995/96WMOIS::BUCKLEY_MFri Jan 13 1995 17:3412
     
    	Blitzburgh   17                  San Fran 49ers    24
                          F                                    F
    	Boltergeist  10                  Dallas Cowboys    13
                           
    
                  **********  SUPERBOWL ***********
    		  *	San Fran 49ers    31      *
                  *                             F *
    		  *	Blitzburgh        13      *
                  *********************************
    
9.3274Panthers might trade #1HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 13 1995 18:1616
>    Think maybe either Carolina or Jacksonville would be interested
>    in Ricky Watters and SF's 1st round pick for their 1st round pick?

Funny you should mention this, FFM.

Today on the local sprots talk show they claimed that the Panthers are
not going to use their overall #1 but instead are shopping it around for
a player and a_other #1.

Haven't heard this exact scenario but a bunch of deals for RBs are being
mentioned.

The feeling is that this draft doesn't have a franchise player.
Specifically, no one is being projected like Bledsoe or Faulk.

TTom
9.3275Oh wellAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Fri Jan 13 1995 18:256
    
    
     Butts and our #1 to get Sapp.  Nah sounds to good?
    
    
    Jerry
9.3276USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jan 13 1995 19:184
>     Butts and our #1 to get Sapp.  Nah sounds to good?

Butts will hit the waiver wire if he isn't scooped during the expansion
draft.
9.3277PredictionsSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Jan 13 1995 19:258
      I think Dallas and Pittsburgh are gonna win, but I want
      Dallas to lose!  Dallas' o-line wins it.  Aikmen at least
      as sharp as Young.
    
    
      Steelers 20      Chargers 6
    
      Cowboys 24       49'ers  20
9.3278Just hope both games are exciting!ODIXIE::ZOGRANTestudo is still grounded!Fri Jan 13 1995 21:007
    I really can't stand Deon, so..
    
    Dallas 27     Frisco 24
    
    Pitts  24     Chargers 17
    
    UMDan                  
9.3279PTOS02::JACOBRSTEELERS-1994 AFC Central ChampsFri Jan 13 1995 21:1010
    re.3278
    
    The best part of Dall-Ass beating San ButtCrisco'd would be the fact
    that we wouldn't have to put up with two weeks of Deion Sanders
    interviews/segments.
    
    JMHO
    
    JaKe
    
9.3280SUBPAC::SKALSKIFri Jan 13 1995 23:5315
    
    
    	Fairywhiners-cowgirls    Tough choice, girls or fairies?
    
    
    	Steelers-Bolts		 Steelers
    
    
    	This read only GIANTS fan must root for a manly man kind of 
    	Steeler team.  I always root NFC except this year when the
    	two teams I hate most are battling for the Big Dance.
    
    				Shark
    
    
9.3281MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Jan 16 1995 00:2813
    Well as I wrote last week ideal SB matchup as far as I was concerned
    would be SF vs. SD. A nice quiet two weeks in ::sprots leading to the
    SB - well after the Cowpoke fans bit*h and moan about a call here and a
    call there. btw what angle showed the Cowboy getting both feet in the
    endzone on their 4th TD? And Jakester & co. will just be in mourning
    for a while. A peace and quiet for a change.
    
    SF is put as a 17.5 favorite. That is the highest starting spread in SB
    I believe that Colts ended as 18 point favorites over the Jets and
    Vikings might have been at 17.5 against KC on game day.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.3282(8^)*CSOA1::JACOBMon Jan 16 1995 03:3110
    
    
    
    >>				And Jakester & co. will just be in mourning
    >>for a while. A peace and quiet for a change.
    
    Kiss my a$$, shorty.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3283No 3 peat this yearSTRATA::GARRYDallas Cowboys shooting for 3-peatMon Jan 16 1995 10:415
    No excuses from this Cowboy fan......congrats to the niners and
    hopefully they will continue the NFC domination of the SB.
    
    
    Tom
9.3284MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Mon Jan 16 1995 11:285
    You gotta figure that the Chargers will continue to 'doormat'
    trend of the AFC in the SB.
    
    
    billl
9.3285The kings are DEAD!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MGarrett &gt; Aikman Mon Jan 16 1995 11:3228
    
    
       Well there is one w/o an excuse than!!!
    
            Last night on talk Radio it was rediculous!! Heres a few
    comments from both Cowgirl players and fans!!
    
      "If we had a 21 pt lead in the first 5 minutes we woulda beat them
    by a hundred" (player)
    
       " Well the NFC is not being represented by the best team this year"
    (player)
    
         Deion gets away with more shoving than anyone in the NFL (player)
    he musta missed irvins pushoff on his 2nd TD??
    
             Referees didn't want Dallas in the Bowl (idiot fan)
            We still outplayed them even though half our team was decimated
    by injuries. (idiot fan)
            
             As far as I'm concerned we are going to the SB (idiot fan) you
    better by tickets than)
    
          I hadn't seen as much crying since 8 last night when my wife was
    watching the All My Children reunion show!!! :-)
    
    
    Chap
9.3286CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 16 1995 12:2519
Well, regardless of what Jerry Jones says, or any of the players, it's my
opinion that if Jimmy Johnson was still the coach, the Cowboys would have
made a game of it.

Switzer made some odious mistakes -- his clock management at the end of the
first half was horrid.

Supposedly Larry Allen's backup couldn't play -- he was healthy, but 
doesn't have the skills.  Then why is he the backup?  What's with that?

I can't imagine a 300 pounder moving on a gimpy ankle, let alone playing
football.


I'm glad San Fran won (some former Giants on the team), but I will give
the Dallas players this:  They Never Quit!


'Saw
9.3287bad line = lossHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 12:3418
I'm not sure what effect Jimmy Johnson woulda had.

What kilt the Cowboys was the overall physical status of the offense,
especially the line and Emmitt.

The point where the Boys started their slide was the car wreck that ended
Williams' season. Throw in a couple of bad wheels for Nate Newton and
Allen and you've got Troy Aikman getting knocked down and/or sacked about
a dozen times.

Emmitt was obviously gimp. Shore he scored a couple of times but that
finished drives others had set up.

The biggest blunder by Switzer was bumping the ref on the no call by Neon
against Michael Irvin. Barry did his best Lou Holtz but the refs were
non-plusssed and added a 15 yard penalty.

TTom
9.3288HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 16 1995 12:4413
RE               <<< Note 9.3287 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>

>What kilt the Cowboys was the overall physical status of the offense,
>especially the line and Emmitt.

  I don't think it's that complex. What killed the Cowboys was 3 turnovers that
lead to 21 quick points. From that point on they actually outplayed the 49'ers
28-17. 

  It's one game, anything can happen. Doesn't prove much except who gets
to play the next game and who goes home.

  George
9.3289CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 16 1995 13:0326
Still, you have to question some of Switzer's coaching decisions.

I mean, we can play what if forever.  What if Pickett's Charge had
been successful, what if Robert E. Lee had pulled out to the southeast
and gotten between the Federals and Washington.....

So, what if:


	- they don't call the draw on 3rd down in the red zone,
	  and end up going for the field goal that gets shanked?

	  (I'd have tried a pass to Novacheck....)


	- they execute some proper clock management late in the first
	  half.

If either of those goes the other way, the game is a LOT closer.


Neon Deion, as much as I don't like his on-field personna, DID take
Harper, the Niner Killer, out of the game....


'Saw
9.3290IMBETR::DUPREZMon Jan 16 1995 13:1019
RE: a few back

Yes, Prime Time got away with one against Irvin (left arm into his chest
on the deep pass.  But I had a hard time feeling sorry for Michael.
Why?

No one, repeat, *no one*, pushes off as much as Michael Irvin.  Yes,
the guy is a great receiver, but this is something that constantly
jumps out at me when you see replays.

I'm kind of inclined to put that one in the "what goes around, comes
around" category.  Refs have been ignoring contact when Irvin's 
involved all year, why stop now?

At least Irvin had the intelligence to not do anything stupid to draw
a penalty after the play.  He was able to leave that to the coach.

Roland
9.3291METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Jan 16 1995 13:3412
One of the constants about championship teams is that they have few injuries
during the season and certainly in the playoffs. Dallas had a remarkably
healthy team the last 2 years come playoff time and it showed. This year
they were not so lucky. Even so it was the first 4 minutes of the game
that killed 'em and it had nothing to do with injuries.

SF got its payback for signing Sanders yesterday. He was signed for this one
game to stop Harper and he did that. Dallas just refused to throw the ball
to Harper, who Deion covered.

The Crazy Met
9.3292Not enough octaneBUMP::MMARLANDMon Jan 16 1995 13:4214
Plain and simple the best team won. The 3 quick turnovers were the game. Had
nothing to do with coaching. Solid defensive plays on all 3 plays and SF took
advantage. Like the last to NFC championship games the D determined the outcome.
Remember the last 2 years SF 's D could come up with the big stop when needed.
Well the same happened to Dallas yesterday.

The only person on Dallas who forgot to show up was Switzer. Stupid play calling
and time mgmt.

Despite injuries, the Boys, show spirit and desire. Not enough this year. End of
discussion.


Mike 
9.3293CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 16 1995 13:467
While I don't think that Deion is "Defensive Player of the Year" he certainly
does excel at coverage.  It's hard to defense against raw speed, and when that
raw speed is on defense, your passing accuracy has to be dead bang on, and
you might need some deception.  Deion adds an extra element....


'Saw
9.3294game ball or 2 to Eric DavisHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 13:559
Ol' Neon was upstaged yesterday by Eric Davis. Davis had 2 interceptions,
including one on the firsted series that he ran back for a TD. This sorta
said how the day was gonna go for the Boys. On the second series, he
stripped Irvin of the ball - musta know Neon don't tackle ;-).

'Bout the onliest thing Davis didn't do was the Neon High Step as he went
into the end zone.

TTom
9.3295Looked MVP to meAYOV27::FW_TEMP01John Hussey - Exiled in jocko landMon Jan 16 1995 13:565
Deion had a hand in the 1st 2 turnovers just being on the field.  Dallas were
obsessed with avoiding him.

The difference in the pass interference calls looked like Jerry Rice had the
brains (slipped?) to fall over whereas Irvin stayed on his feet.
9.3296HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 16 1995 14:3329
  Well the only reason Eric Davis looked better than Sanders was that they
wouldn't go near Sanders all day. He effectively took who ever he was playing
out of the game. That doesn't look all that great on highlight films but it
probably does as much to win ball games as coming up with an interception. When
they did throw at Neon he left Irving babbling by the sidelines and walked away
with an easy interception. 

  Sanders is one outstanding player who has as much impact on defense as any
defensive back I've ever seen. He not only controls his guy, he influences the
entire game plan of the offense. 

  As for the Dallas coach and "what ifs", if they had made that field goal
that would have been a tying drive at the end of the game. If they had thrown
into the endzone maybe it would have been a touchdown but they still would have
had to score a touchdown on the final drive to win.

  I just don't see where it was that big a deal, most likely they would have
lost no matter what he had called on that play. But if he had been a really
bad coach and had failed to pull his team together at the beginning of the
season they would have finished 7-9 and would have been home for Christmas.

  At least he got his guys to the NFC Championship game and gave them a shot.
They threw that chance away with those 3 early turnovers and he did a fair
job of trying to get it back outscoring the 49'ers 28-17 from that point on.

  Everyone contributed to the loss but it seems that if you consider the
entire year and the entire game, the Dallas coaching staff came off ok.

  George
9.3297goodHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 14:389
Yeah, Neon literally took Alvin Harper outta the game. 

After Neon completely stopped Harper, he started to free lance and ended
up on Irvin a couple of notable times. Aikman, however, continued to
ignore Harper.

Ol' Alvin's probably still crying about the Boys not going to him.

TTom
9.3298Thought Cowboys the Better TeamLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Jan 16 1995 15:1334
      Being a Packer fan, the most important part for me was for
      the Cowboys to lose.  Why?  NO THREEPEAT.  The Pack won the
      NFL Championship in 65, 66, and 67, but the 65 one was before
      the 1st Super Bowl.  Thus, had the Cowboys won it this year,
      they would have done something more remarkable than what the
      Pack did.
    
      But, I feel the Cowboys are the better team even though I
      wanted them to lose.
    
      They have a rookie right tackle with a bum ankle playing instead
      of arguably the best offensive lineman in the game.   Smith plays
      on bad wheels and re-pulls a hamstring and misses the last quarter
      or so.  They spot the 49'ers 21-0 in their park and still are in
      the game till the end.
    
      The two biggest plays were the late 1st hald TD and the whole noncall
      Switzer penalty sequence.  The 10 yard draw didn't help either.
      Johnson must be in 7th heaven!  Switzer just really blew it, lacking
      the control so pivotal at that late stretch of the game.
    
      Man, if it was 3rd and 10 instead of 3rd and 25 OR if the penalty 
      was called, who knows what would have happened?
    
      But, those Cowboys were real warriors.  What can you say about 
      Aikmen, Irvin, and Smith?
    
      And even though Sanders did interfere...what a game!  How many DB's
      can block a sideline pass thrown by Aikmen like he did?  Or how
      about outrunning Irvin and making that INT?   Amazing.
    
      Two awesome teams, but I think the Cowboys are the better team.
    
                                                      Tony
9.3299Whatta game!ONOFRE::MAY_BRNiners smoke, Cowboys chokeMon Jan 16 1995 15:1716
    
    I never liked Jimmy, but Barry has given me a greater appreciation for
    what he did.  First, he knew how to coack a team, and never cost them a
    big game by a series of stupid coaching mistakes and second, he would
    never whine about the field or the refs when he and his team were more
    responsible for the loss.
    
    The other thing that bugs me is the cowgirl fans saying that the 'girls
    would have won had they not gotten behind early, because the 'girls had
    better stats.  The early turnovers and a 21-0 lead halfway through the
    1st quarter completely changed the complexion of the game.  The niners
    and girls gameplans were different than what would have been.
    
    Boy was it fun to watch, though.
    
    brews
9.3300Expectations probably too high but this game was slop, in slopEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jan 16 1995 15:2914
    Anybody else think that for the Game of the Decade featuring the two
    best teams in the NFL, that SF-Dallas was very sloppily played, 
    even beyond what the field conditions could excuse?  I'm not talking
    just about the turnovers, but rather stuff like Dallas' easy TD to 
    Irvin when on the ropes down 21-0, SF's inexcusably easy TD to Rice 
    at the end of the half, etc.  These weren't coaching mistakes, but
    rather major breakdowns, even considering the great players involved.
    The best team probably won but the game was not played with at the
    mental or intensity level I expected coming off the flawless,
    destructive exhibitions by each team the week before...
    
    glenn
    
9.3301Steelers lack of DHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 15:345
The Major Breakdown Award o' the Day should go to the Steelers D on the
TD pass to Pupunu. Pupunu was beyond wide open as virtually no one was
around to defend or stop him.

TTom
9.3302Yup, it was Breakdown Sunday...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jan 16 1995 15:4218
   
> The Major Breakdown Award o' the Day should go to the Steelers D on the
> TD pass to Pupunu. Pupunu was beyond wide open as virtually no one was
> around to defend or stop him.
    
    I honestly think the winning TD was worse, from a strategic viewpoint.
    You kind of expect one of these things per game from a blitzing
    defense, if not to that extent.  Pretty sure the Pupunu play came on
    either 1st or 2nd down where the defenders were fooled and bit on the
    run.  Okay, you got burned once.  But absolutely no way should a 
    _primary_ receiver get that wide open on 3rd-and-15 protecting a 
    3-point lead in the final minutes.  That play falls into the miracle
    category (close to the Rice TD at the end of the first half, where most
    of the defense should have been playing on the goal line, conceding the
    FG if necessary).
    
    glenn
    
9.3303no respectHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 16:0820
Even Switzer was commenting on the D or rather lack of D on the Rice TD
right at the half. 

The long bomb that McKyer failed to cover was a case of bad execution
more than bad defense. McKyer got completely turned around and by the
time the ball got there he had no chance. 

BTW, McKyer had to be carried off the field at the end of the game. He
completely lost it after the game.

The comments in the paper that are most telling are by the Chargers that
to a man credit Pittsburgh attitude more than anything else. The Steelers
were reported already at work on Super Bowl videos. SD noticed the
complete lack of respect and used it as motivitation. The lack of respect
evidently continues with Woodson refusing to admit that the best team is
moving on and with Figures doint that you didnt win it we lost it thing.

Give it up. You lost.

TTom
9.3304Forrrre!MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Mon Jan 16 1995 16:1819
>The comments in the paper that are most telling are by the Chargers that
>to a man credit Pittsburgh attitude more than anything else. The Steelers
>were reported already at work on Super Bowl videos. SD noticed the
>complete lack of respect and used it as motivitation. The lack of respect
>evidently continues with Woodson refusing to admit that the best team is
>moving on and with Figures doint that you didnt win it we lost it thing.

    This isn't the first time it happened and probably won't be the last.
    Teams seem to get caught looking past supposedly inferior opponents
    only to find themselves booking early tee times and wondering what
    hit them.
    
>Give it up. You lost.
    
    That's true, but sure doesn't make it any easier for this Steeler
    fan to swallow.
    
    
    billl
9.3305CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 16 1995 16:3515
|>Give it up. You lost.
|    
|    That's true, but sure doesn't make it any easier for this Steeler
|    fan to swallow.
    

Well, it's a bitch now, but as I've said, many, many times a loss like
this is a catalyst to greater success in the next season.

Cowher is a damn good coach, he's young, his talent base is stable...  I think
that he'll bring them back.


'Saw

9.3306CNTROL::CHILDSPresident of Donny Osmond FanClubMon Jan 16 1995 16:477
 to his credit Cowher took it like a man. basically gave the Chargers'
 credit and said you don't loose on one play here or there you loose
 because of the whole game and the whole team not one player.......

 mike

9.3307not alwaysHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 16:508
>Well, it's a bitch now, but as I've said, many, many times a loss like
>this is a catalyst to greater success in the next season.

You mean like Buffalo did after the wide-right by Norwood? ;-)

Yeah, Cowher did show some class.

TTom
9.3308MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Mon Jan 16 1995 17:067
    >>Yeah, Cowher did show some class.
    
    What else would you expect from a native 'burgher?!
    
    
    
    billl
9.3309Steelers will have to live with it; ain't no morality play thoughEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Jan 16 1995 17:1616
                                     
    I don't see that the Steelers need to make any apologies.  For the most
    part they are a tough, dedicated and generally classy bunch.  It didn't 
    look to me like they were caught off guard, out-motivated or any 
    other such thing.  They didn't make the plays when it was critical, so 
    they were beaten fair and square by a deserving Chargers team.  They'll
    have to deal with that fact and will likely be kicking themselves over 
    a long, bitter off-season.  But the rest of the stuff, about the 
    talking and the supposed lack of respect, that sounds like post-facto
    media garbage as usual; to the victors go the spoils, from the 
    vanquished a pound of flesh.  Just one week ago it was the Steelers
    that weren't receiving the proper respect before the Browns game, and
    after the Super Bowl it'll be some other story, I'm sure.
    
    glenn
    
9.3310Go PackmanHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 17:1715
>    What else would you expect from a native 'burgher?!

Or a guy who went to NC State!

From USA Today, today:

NFL best postseason records:

	1. Green Bay		14-7	.667
	2. San Francisco	20-11	.645
	3. Dallas		28-18	.609
	4. Washington		21-14	.600
	5. PIttsburgh		17-12	.586

TTom
9.3311HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 16 1995 17:2823
RE                     <<< Note 9.3309 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>

>    I don't see that the Steelers need to make any apologies.  

  I agree with you here. In any sport winning a playoff doesn't mean you are
better, it just means you win and get to advance. Weak teams beat better teams
all the time.

  This goes double for football where you only get one shot. Anyone can win one
game. How often in other sports does some team get blown out in the 1st game
of a 7 game series then go on to win?

  At least Pittsburgh and Dallas made their opponents work for their victory
unlike the teams last week that just rolled over and let the teams walk over
them with 15+ margins of victory. 

  Still congradulations to the Padres and 49'ers. One TV station has already
started calling this the San Bowl.

  I hope the Padres come ready to play and surprise everyone like they did
yesterday. It would be great to see a close game.

  George
9.3312CNTROL::CHILDSPresident of Donny Osmond FanClubMon Jan 16 1995 17:339
  I agree with you here. In any sport winning a playoff doesn't mean you are
better, it just means you win and get to advance. Weak teams beat better teams
all the time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 is this excuse #1 or #2 in the UNC handbook?

 ;^)
9.3313CNTROL::CHILDSPresident of Donny Osmond FanClubMon Jan 16 1995 17:345
 Tommy, you'll be happy to know my notes friends over in ::Giants are enjoying
 my p-name as well. Just don't expect to see me in ::RAD_RAD this week.....

 ;^)
9.3314could use a couple of 'emHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 17:4215
>  Still congradulations to the Padres and 49'ers. One TV station has already
>started calling this the San Bowl.
>
>  I hope the Padres come ready to play and surprise everyone like they did
>yesterday. It would be great to see a close game.

Padres are going to the Super Bowl? One lasted chance for Tony Gwynn?

NFL playoffs are like College hoops playoffs in the sense of one and
you're out. That's really the basis of the Tar Heel Excuse Bible. 

Let's see, Dallas can invoke Excuse #1, injuries. The Steelers can use
#2, played a hot team.

TTom
9.3315DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFree Whitey Bulger!Mon Jan 16 1995 17:425
    	Hey Glenn, considering that the Steelers were taping their Super
    Bowl Rap song last week the "lack of respect" theme has some validity.
    At least the Bears backed up their "Super Bowl Shuffle" video...
    
    				   /Don
9.3316DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFree Whitey Bulger!Mon Jan 16 1995 17:431
    	If it really is the Padres versus the 49ers give the 18 points!
9.3317HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 16 1995 18:0210
RE               <<< Note 9.3314 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>

>Padres are going to the Super Bowl? One lasted chance for Tony Gwynn?

  Oops, got my SD teams mixed up.

  That's what I get for buying the 1995 Bill James player rating book before
the game yesterday.

  George
9.3318HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 16 1995 18:0316
RE    <<< Note 9.3312 by CNTROL::CHILDS "President of Donny Osmond FanClub" >>>

>  I agree with you here. In any sport winning a playoff doesn't mean you are
>better, it just means you win and get to advance. Weak teams beat better teams
>all the time.
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> is this excuse #1 or #2 in the UNC handbook?

  Well it's clearly not an excuse since I'm not a Steelers fan and have no
reason to make excuses for their team.

  It's just my belief that regardless of who wins, my team or anyone else's,
games don't show who is better, just who did better.

  George
9.3319real power ratings?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 18:053
Is Bill James the same James that rates war powers and weapons?

TTom
9.3320oopsAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Mon Jan 16 1995 18:075
    
    
     No thats Janes
    
    Jerry
9.3321OLD1S::CADZILLA2CanyourollmeanotherBullDurhampleaseMon Jan 16 1995 18:112
    
    Actually it's Jane's, a British arm's research group.
9.3322I figured you might for the Steelers though to see Tommy with that p-nameCNTROL::CHILDSPresident of Donny Osmond FanClubMon Jan 16 1995 18:126
 Touchy Touchy....I didn't say you were a fan, I didn't say you were making
 an excuse. What I was asking was which one of the UNC excuse that ACCHris
 used to exhaust us with was this one that's all.......

 mike
9.3323but why baseball?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 18:156
Janes Gang, that band that Joe Walsh used to play in afore he went to the
Eagles? ;-)

Jane's. I see. Thanks.

TTom
9.3324HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 16 1995 18:2212
RE    <<< Note 9.3322 by CNTROL::CHILDS "President of Donny Osmond FanClub" >>>

> Touchy Touchy....I didn't say you were a fan, I didn't say you were making
> an excuse. What I was asking was which one of the UNC excuse that ACCHris
> used to exhaust us with was this one that's all.......

  Well I'm not really sure what UNC means or who ACCHris is so I'm not sure
what you mean but I'm not making excuses for anyone. I just have a belief in
general, even if my team wins, that games don't show who is better, just who
did better.

  George
9.3325DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Jan 16 1995 18:254
    	News mentioned yesterday that he LA Rams were most likely on
    	there way to St Louis, MO.
    
    	Scot
9.3326angstHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 18:2717
>  Well I'm not really sure what UNC means or who ACCHris is so I'm not sure

This statement really astounds me. It makes me realize how much Digital
and SPROTS have lost the lasted couple of years or so.

Saw, we got us the makings of some type of eulogy, elegy or some dang
essay. This new Digital shore aint the old Digital.

George, none of this is directed towards you. Not Mike's comments about
Escuse Bibles and not mine about how things used to be. Read 21.*, about
any of 'em by Knorr and you'll encounter some reference to the Excuse
Bible.

TTom



9.3327I was a principalCNTROL::CHILDSPresident of Donny Osmond FanClubMon Jan 16 1995 18:2811
 UNC = University of North Carolina Tarheels

 ACChris = the most zealous UNC fan ever to note in ::Sports

 excuses he had so many every time UNC lost we started to number and
 document them.

 given your point of view I doubt you'd have qualified for weasel status...

 ;^)
9.3328enjoyHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 18:343
I salvaged the Weasels Org chart and posted it in 21.

TTom
9.3329DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFree Whitey Bulger!Mon Jan 16 1995 18:365
    	I would've loved to hear Cyst's description of the overachieving
    win by the "bench deprived" Star Heels over the star-studded Maryland
    team last week...  Hate to admit it, but I actually miss him.
    
    				   /Don
9.3330nostalgiaHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Jan 16 1995 18:558
Slasher, 

I just read some of the great works of 90 and 91 in the ACC topic.

Not only do I miss ACChris, but BobHunt and MrT shore left us a legacy,
too.

TTom
9.3331Devastating news for ::SPROTS received in the mailCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Mon Jan 16 1995 19:194
|Saw, we got us the makings of some type of eulogy, elegy or some dang
|essay. This new Digital shore aint the old Digital.

I'll say.  You know this is true when dan'l gets hitched.
9.3332Best I could do on short notice....CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Tue Jan 17 1995 13:19110
>|Saw, we got us the makings of some type of eulogy, elegy or some dang
>|essay. This new Digital shore aint the old Digital.
>
>I'll say.  You know this is true when dan'l gets hitched.


The Bible says "In the midst of life, we are in death."   Verily I say to
you this is true (can I get an amen?).

For an all too fleeting period of time, one bright and shining moment as
it were, SPORTS transcended mere notesfile-dom, and became more than the
sum of all its parts.  There was a synergy, yes, there was an 
electricity that flowed and coursed through its veins.

The Golden Age of SPORTS is no longer.  Gone are icons we grew to cherish,
gone are the familiar trappings of a comfortable old friend.

MrT.... who could ever forget the incredible, incredulous, incontrovertible
and sometimes incriminating diatribes by the one, the only, the man who
created a miniature funeral pyre for a mouse whilst standing in his bathrobe,
testicles freezing in the Minnesota winter air, Tom Shaugnessy.

Who could ever forget the description of the AIDS sore seeping through the
back of his suit jacket, or his story about Conan the Librarian?   Who 
indeed could forget his satirical parody of a paean to Dean Smith, with its
wonderful line "it's all thrust up and knobby"?   Who could forget the
personal name string  "Plato, Homer, Voltaire, BobKnight", or the annual
"Ayrton Senna must die".   My only regret was that when Ayrton Senna finally
did die, MrT wasn't around to write about it.  Who could forget his wonderful
monicker for /Don:  RoachyPoachy Main.....


Who can dare forget Bob Hunt, defender of the faith?  Bob, who coined the
term Hare Smithna.  Bob, the consumate Eagles and Phillies fan.  Bob, the
big man, with a big heart, and a familial unit called the HuntCluster, 
complete with Microhunts.   Bob Hunt, noter extraordinaire.

Lost in the dusty annals of SPORTS time are the wonderful, opinion-packed
plot synopses of LA Law, when it was good.  I'd miss a night, and come in
on a Friday, to find Bob's recap, and all was good with the world.

Bob Hunt went up against ACChris, sometimes in concert with MrT, but
more often, alone, by himself, hammering and chiseling away at the UNC
Excuse Bible.  Bob, who carried the mantle alone after MrT departed, was
a crafty veteran of the ACC debates.

Bob Hunt, who longed to be a sportswriter, and fulfilled that dream recently.


ACChris, aka ACCrisp, was a UNC/DeanSmith zealot.  More than a few of us got
a perverse, testicle-tingling, get me a roll of Bounty, pleasure when UNC
would lose and we'd know that ACChris would come in and start the excuses.

"We ran into a hot team", or "the players had exams" were among the almost
inumerable excuses he'd come up with.  He'd also engage in more than his
share of LouHoltz sandbagging, especially if UNC got ranked high in the
pre-season polls.

ACChris, possessed (sorta) by Da Debil, blind follower of Hare Smithna,
saw a conspiracy behind every locked hotel room door.....


They were the Triumverate, the Holy Trinity as it were, of the UNC/DeanSmif
hoops wars.  They are sorely missed, and to paraphrase my main main, old
Will, we shall not see their like again.


There are others on the roll of the SPORTS missing, others who added spice
and flavor, the Tabasco sauce if you will of the Sports Tavern.


	Hawk, who always wanted to party wif you.

	Mike Johnston, Junk Noter Extraordinaire -- that our Junk Note bears
	his memorial name is testament to the abilities of this fine man.

	The Bibe.  A moment of silence please, in all sincerity, for the
 	man who restored my faith in boxing.  With all due respect to
	Tommy Brydie, Sports has never seen a boxing expert like The Bibe.

	jIm DinSmORe.  The Dinz.  Dinsdale.  Who could ever forget his
	typing, or his wonderful malapropism, Hallugeons.

	Jim Wardle, aka Wardlevane.  Like a weathervane spinning in the
	wind, Jim's allegiances changed, and changed, and changed.

	John Devlin, JD, the LATmaster....

	Dan "Park Effects" Schneider.  Who could EVER forget his
	"Schneider stole the butt", or his diatribes which rivalled
	MrT.  Last seen in Harlem, in pursuit of his MBA....

	Hoot and Monty, Denny, Chap, REK, Kev.... the list goes ever on.


In the military, when you sit down to a meal, there is often a custom of
raising a glass and toasting "To absent comrades."

Here, I offer a toast, to Sports Golden Age, and those who took up the cause
and are no more:

		To absent comrades!



'Saw




9.3333Re-alignment needed!!!WMOIS::BUCKLEY_MTue Jan 17 1995 16:014
    	Pittsburgh should be able to repeat as Central Division Champs
    	next year with the addition of the Expansion team.  They will have
    	an easy 6 wins with Houston, Cincy, and Carolina in their division.
    	
9.3334SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Tue Jan 17 1995 16:045
    
    	Forget about Pittsburgh, can the '49ers schedule get any easier?
    Atlanta, Rams, Jacksonville, and New Orleans.
    
    Ron
9.3335ONOFRE::MAY_BRNiners smoke, Cowboys chokeTue Jan 17 1995 16:054
    The AFC Central was the weakest division in the NFL
    this season.  Adding Carolina will make it worse.
    
    brews
9.3336EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 17 1995 16:108
    
    All the existing teams in those divisions play the expansion teams 
    twice, too.  The division champs like the Steelers will have no added
    advantage in winning their division the next year.  It'll be the 
    runners-up that receive the advantage, in the run for wildcard spots.
    
    glenn
    
9.3337ONOFRE::MAY_BRNiners smoke, Cowboys chokeTue Jan 17 1995 16:244
    THeir advantage will be in fighting for HFA, not in fighting it out in
    their division.
    
    brews
9.3338Seems like the bye week is the big advantageAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeTue Jan 17 1995 16:271
    
9.3339HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 17 1995 16:317
  Well now wait a minute.

  Do all you Dawgs think that the Steelers will walk away with the AFC
Central?

  ~\~
  George
9.3340ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsTue Jan 17 1995 16:4817
>    	Pittsburgh should be able to repeat as Central Division Champs
>    	next year with the addition of the Expansion team.  They will have
>    	an easy 6 wins with Houston, Cincy, and Carolina in their division.
    
    Cleveland plays the same teams the same number of times...
    
    Cleveland - Pittsburgh should be just as good a matchup next year.
    While the Browns' braintrust (and I use that term with great
    reservations) doesn't seem to see the problem of having Vinny as 
    their #1 quarterback, it's still possible that the Browns will
    improve in that area by next year.
    
    I'll half-agree with you - _if_ Vinny is still the QB for the Browns
    for the majority of the '95 season, _then_ Pittsburgh _should_ win
    the AFC Central.
    
    Joe
9.3341TOOK::HALPINSteelers join the Browns in the Wait-til-next-year Club!!!Tue Jan 17 1995 17:3414
    
    
    	Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and the Niners  won't gain that much (if
    any) advantage from having the expansion teams in theri divisions.
    Under the old scheduling algorithm, all the team in the 4-team
    divisions (AFC-C & NFC-W) played each of the 5th place teams
    from the two other divisions in their conferences. So both
    Pittsburg and Cleveland played the Colts and Seattle this
    year. Next year they'll play two games against Carolina
    instead. Either way they get two games against last place
    teams that they should win.... No big deal....
    
    JimH
    
9.3342PTOSS1::JACOBRSTEELERS-1994 AFC Central ChampsTue Jan 17 1995 19:116
    Uh, excuuuuse me peoples, but Carolina is going into the NFC West and
    Jacksonville is going into the AFC CEntral, not visa versa as somma
    younzes has been putting in here.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3343Freakin Lunatics?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 17 1995 19:576
Nice effort, Saw.

One question: who started the Freakin Lunatics? I remember when you had
to try out to make the team and now it's down to a handful o' us.

TTom
9.3344CNTROL::CHILDSPresident of Donny Osmond FanClubTue Jan 17 1995 20:154
 I think it was Hawk......

 mike
9.3345Looking down from SPROTS heavenMSBCS::GALVINknockemdownspinemrounheygobowlingWed Jan 18 1995 11:4513
    Saw,
    
    I got's to add a name to your note in .3332
    
    
    Al (King of the one-liners) Cote.
    
    A former colleague of mine, and all around good Joe.  May he rest in
    peace.  A life cut too short.
    
    Thanks,
    
    RTG
9.3346hopefullyHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Jan 18 1995 13:306
I forgot about Al. 

Maybe him and Bibe are discussing the relative merits of Don King right
now. ;-)

TTom
9.3347BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Jan 18 1995 13:5411

	Looks like it's official, the Rams are going to St. Louis.  Are they
	going to change the name or will it still be the Rams?  Looks like
	the Rams really made out on this deal.

	On a Ram related note, Sonny Libbick of the Colorado St. Rams has
	decided that he will stay at CSU instead of taking the head coaching
	job at Miami.  that really surprised me.

	Kevin
9.3348DELNI::FORGETWed Jan 18 1995 14:4411
    
    
         Last night of ESPN, they said the St.Louis Rams, that no stores
    had the t-shirts printed up, cause they got burn when they had the
    St.Louis Stallions t-shirt printed when the NFL was expanding and
    St.Louis got shut out.
    
    Sonny Libbick of the Colorado St. Rams said his reason for not going to 
    Miami was that, the coaching is only good for 4/5 years.   That he
    wanted to stayed in Colorado for along time.  I understood his answer,
    i thought it was a good answer.
9.3349Sanctions?ODIXIE::ZOGRANTestudo is still grounded!Wed Jan 18 1995 15:265
    Minor rathole - Just wondering if the Pell Grant scandal and great
    condo-on-the-beach for low rent scam are scaring away potential coaches
    from the Miami job?
    
    UMDan 
9.3350that and moreHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Jan 18 1995 15:359
Lubick alluded to this and other continuing investigations in Coral
Gables.

I doubt that this is realy a reason, though. Miami is a high-pressured
football factory. Any coach coming in knows that he'll have to have the
Hurricanes way up there in the Top 10 to keep his job. That alone might
not help, what with the semi-tradition of winning the MNC at Miami.

TTom
9.3351TTom's rightBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Jan 18 1995 15:5128
>               <<< Note 9.3350 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>
>                               -< that and more >-
>
>Lubick alluded to this and other continuing investigations in Coral
>Gables.
>
>I doubt that this is realy a reason, though. Miami is a high-pressured
>football factory. Any coach coming in knows that he'll have to have the
>Hurricanes way up there in the Top 10 to keep his job. That alone might
>not help, what with the semi-tradition of winning the MNC at Miami.
>
>TTom

	TTom,

	Last night he was being interviewed on the Sports Zoo and he said
	basically what you said.

	1.  When he was an assistant down there, there was a scandal every
	year so it was no big deal.

	2.  He said that the pressure down there is tremendous, if you have
	one loss you're in big trouble.  He even mentioned that at some schools,
	ND for instance, you can lose 4-5 games per year and not have to worry
	about your job.

	Kevin
	Now, back to the NFL....
9.3352PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFWed Jan 18 1995 15:5920
  Let's see, a month ago, CSU goes all out to offer Lubick the best contract 
  it could possibly offer any coach. Lubick balks at signing because of
  rumors that the Miami job will be available soon. Lubick was the Miami
  defensive coordinator and is well known and liked in Coral Gables.
  Lubick interviews for the job and is told that he's their man and the
  other interviews will just be formalities. 2 days later, Lubick takes his
  name out of the Miami hat and signs the long term deal with CSU.  

  I have suspicions that there's more to this than we've heard. Most
  likely, Lubick is expecting Miami to be put on probation. There's little
  upside potential at Miami but lot's of downside potential. 

  Another thing to consider: at Miami, if ya lose 2 games you're considered
  a failure. After what Lubick did at CSU the last 2 years, he'll always
  be well liked in Colorado. CSU also has a lot of upside potential. Recently, 
  the newspapers were talking about how the Colorado universities will need 
  to grow because of the rapid increase in population. CSU is more easily 
  expandable than CU.

	Keith
9.3353dollarsHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Jan 18 1995 16:068
Lubick also mentioned that the "offer" from Miami was $200K less that
Fort Collins.

I got the impression from this far away that Lubick's decision was based
a lot no Miami indecision. Lubick was in a sorta limbo, not knowing about
Miami and not doing his job at CSU.

TTom
9.3354There's one very big upside: stepping stone to the NFLEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 18 1995 16:3922
    
>  I have suspicions that there's more to this than we've heard. Most
>  likely, Lubick is expecting Miami to be put on probation. There's little
>  upside potential at Miami but lot's of downside potential. 
    
    On the other hand, if you have really huge aspirations beyond mere
    security, you can follow the Dennis Erickson formula to the big haul: 
    achieve some moderate but legitimate success at a school where little
    is expected, build the reputation up further by getting out when the
    gettings' good by taking the Miami job where more success is all but 
    guaranteed, and become declared the kind of hot-property "jeenyus" in 
    your specific department that can demand a $5M+ NFL deal.
    
    In the specific case of Erickson, I don't know if he will or won't make 
    a good NFL coach, but how can anyone really know to justify that kind
    of upper-percentile contract?  Certainly the on-the-field tightness and 
    cohesiveness has not been there at Miami the last two years.  They've
    been as sloppy as any talented major-college team I've seen in that
    span...
    
    glenn
    
9.3355maybe it aint the coaching?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoWed Jan 18 1995 16:438
Miami looks liek it succeeds with the speed and other physical talents of
the athletes that get there.

Schellenburgerbergurburgher, Jimmy Johnson and now Erickson have all been
successful with very similar teams. There's no reason to doubt that the
nexted guy caint succeed.

TTom
9.3356Ooh - my arm hurts from patting myself on the back!TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Thu Jan 19 1995 17:148
    Sorry I haven't been in here this week, but I wanted to congratulate
    myself for my excellent predictions this past weekend.  To refresh your
    memories, I had these picks:
    
    	San Diego 16, Pittsburgh 13
    	San Francisco 31, Dallas 28
    
    NAZZ
9.3357more 'predictions'?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Jan 19 1995 17:155
Sorry Nazz but San Fran covered.

Have you picked the BC-Kansas St Bowl yet? ;-)

TTom
9.3358Vegas was fun, but my wife and I both lost bigTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Thu Jan 19 1995 17:274
    I must admit I dropped $20 at the futures book at Bally's when I took
    the Patriots to win the AFC title!
    
    NAZZ
9.3359early wageringHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Jan 19 1995 17:427
A friend of mine just got back from Vegas. 

Lasted Saturday, afore either conference championship was settled, he bet
the NFC minus 12 over the AFC. Now that the teams are known, the line's
near 20. Not a bad swing.

TTom
9.3360CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Fri Jan 20 1995 11:4615
>    Al (King of the one-liners) Cote.
>    
>    A former colleague of mine, and all around good Joe.  May he rest in
>    peace.  A life cut too short.
>    
>    Thanks,
>    
>    RTG

Sorry.  I remembered that someone else left us way too early, but I couldn't
remember who.

'Saw


9.3361I was movedMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Jan 20 1995 12:5210
I'm a latecomer in two senses: 1, I haven't been in here since Monday;
2, I didn't get into this notesfile until after all those noters had
left (except Kev; I was RONning then).

But I just have to thank you for .3332, 'Saw--a fine piece of writing.

Steve

P.S.:  this notesfile is *still* one of a kind, and I'm delighted to
have made the acquaintance of all you good folks in sprotsland.
9.3362 :^) GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Fri Jan 20 1995 13:294
    
    	Sucking up will get you nowhere.
    
    Claybone
9.3363NFL Players o' the YearHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 20 1995 15:4211
The NFL Players Association has voted on its awards for thised year.

			NFC			AFC
MVP			Barry Sanders		Dan Marino
Defensive Lineman	Reggie White		Bruce Smith
Offensive Lineman	William Roaf		Richmond Webb
Linebacker		Ken Harvey		Junior Seau, Kevin Greene
Defensive Back		Deion Sanders		Rod Woodson
Special Teams		Mel Gray		Eric Metcalf
Offensive Rookie	Erric Rhett		Marshall Faulk
Defensive Rookie	Bryant Young		Antonio Langham
9.3364MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jan 20 1995 16:003
    
      Is that number 34 pick in the draft, Errict Rhett, as the
     NFC offensive Rookie Of The Year? Who'd a thunk it?
9.3365Only You!!STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Jan 20 1995 17:232
      You would have Tommy!
    
9.3366Flutie to stay in CFLHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 20 1995 17:3511
Well one thing is almost certain.

Doug Flutie most likely will not be playing again in the NFL. He just
signed a 5-year deal, for a mil plus per year. Flutie says that this will
likely take him to the end of his football career.

For a while, there might have been a glimmer of hope for the teams that
need a winning QB, such as Cleveland, the Giants, etc. Now, that hope is
gone.

TTom
9.3367CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Fri Jan 20 1995 17:436
|For a while, there might have been a glimmer of hope for the teams that
|need a winning QB, such as Cleveland, the Giants, etc. Now, that hope is
|gone.

If Flutie had signed with the Giants, our pal JD would have
gone into cardiac arrest...
9.3368this too shall passHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 20 1995 17:476
And Saw woulda been drinkin heavily and beatin up on poor Kim even afore
she moved in ;-).

For a mil, the Panthers mighta been interested in him.

TTom
9.3369Good Luck Doug; AKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeFri Jan 20 1995 19:238
    So when do we go down to Baltimore to see Flutie - can we get an Os
    game in the same weekend?
    
    I guess that's where Doug was fated.  Apparently his strike appearance
    became the biggest factor in his leaving the nfl.  That's a good lesson
    for any baseball strike-breakers to keep in mind.
    
    
9.3370ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsFri Jan 20 1995 19:419
    
>    I guess that's where Doug was fated.  Apparently his strike appearance
>    became the biggest factor in his leaving the nfl.  That's a good lesson
>    for any baseball strike-breakers to keep in mind.
    
    Of course, Steve "Sonny" Bono broke in during the strike, if I remember
    correctly, and hasn't done too poorly...
    
    Joe
9.3371packscabHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 20 1995 19:488
Another scab who's made a pile of money is Eric Kramer. He played for the
Falcons and did quite well. Good enough to get about $8mil from Chicago. 

I was kinda surprised that Kramer wasn't on the dispersal draft list by
the Bears. I guess Wannstedt was afraid to lose him and the unsigned
Steve Walsh.

TTom
9.3372I guess Kramer played a little with VikesAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeFri Jan 20 1995 20:196
    Exactly what has either done aside from getting $money?
    
    Flutie's appearance was much heralded and drew a big crowd and may have
    been seen as a factor in ending strike.  Pat Sullivan used Doug badly
    and when players dropped balls and went offside to make Flutie look
    bad a fast firing would have helped.
9.3373some playoffs wins with DetroitHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 20 1995 20:244
Kramer's career peaked in Detroit the year they faced the Skins in the
NFC title game. Along the way they beat Dallas. 

TTom
9.3374ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Jan 20 1995 21:114
9.3375AKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeFri Jan 20 1995 21:266
    And the nfl will never prove to me that Flutie couldn't have played
    there.  I just see a lot of clowns and your Belichick is the mold who
    are set in there ways with the imagination of rocks.
    
    You dawgs should've been begging modell to sign flutie; talk about a
    team destined to be mired at .500-.550 seasons for years.
9.3376ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sat Jan 21 1995 11:529
9.3377PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Jan 23 1995 01:293
    Saw, were you thinking of The Bible of Boxing?
    
    Mark.
9.3378My point, no?AKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeMon Jan 23 1995 14:2114
    Groaner are you then in agreement that .550 seasons and wild card
    qualifying is all you can hope for.  Your 11-5 was indeed > than our
    10-6 and I don't blame you for being thrilled at the prospect of a
    similar year next year to this.
    
    And you should have been nicer to us objective Pat's fans since in my
    case I've rooted for the Browns for years but held back this year and
    as your buddy Tcm will be the first to attest I got his Rangers into
    the Cup final last year and could've got you past de Burgh.
    
    And I recall taking pride in bringing the Browns back from elimination
    against the Jets back about 89/90 but it was beyond my power to help
    them against the doncs.  I've never been able to anything for or
    against Denver, must be the altitude.
9.3379DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFree Whitey Bulger!Mon Jan 23 1995 15:5112
9.3380You would have to get me going on that oneAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeMon Jan 23 1995 16:4812
    Defenses adopted a very successful strategy against Doug, that of
    having the big defensive ends and tackles defer their rush and instead
    concentrate on knocking the ball down.  Ironically the Pats (current)
    used this same method quite abit this year.
    
    When a teams employs that type of defense the offensive coodinator has
    to adjust his strategy.  Flutie was forced to be a drop back pocket
    passer; 49er style moving pockets would have been much more his style.
    
    Count me in on the pro-Flutie, sorry I missed that Jihad as well as the
    Bird one where I would have been a staunch anti-Bird-as-God ally to
    that small but doughty crew.
9.3381WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Jan 23 1995 18:125
    
    > Defenses adopted a very successful strategy against Doug
    
    Yeah, let Ray Berry control Flutie's offense and don't worry about it
    after that!  :^)
9.3382questionBSS::MENDEZMon Jan 23 1995 19:012
    so who stopped flutie at chicago?
    
9.3383HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 23 1995 19:0911
  As I remember, Flutie didn't do all that bad in the NFL. People kept saying
he couldn't play but he did and when he played the Patriots did rather well. As
for the Bears, wasn't he playing behind McMann back then? 

  At any rate regardless if he failed in the NFL because he couldn't play or
because everyone refused to believe that he could play, he's done very well in
the CFL and it makes sense for him to finish his career up there.

  Then no doubt it will be off to one of the networks to cover the NFL.

  George
9.3384AKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeMon Jan 23 1995 19:1410
    Was he stopped?  He played some games for Ditka, Ditka liked him.  He
    was a rookie and second year player behind MacMahon whose main problem
    then was injury but otherwise highly rated.
    
    Flutie was waived to the Pats per Sullivan's request, partly to boost
    attendance.
    
    Ditka has never had much luck with quarterbacks other than the singular
    McMahon.  Harbaugh and others have crashed under Mike's impatient
    rejime.
9.3385Tobin thinks he's pretty though...SALEM::DODAStop Global WhiningMon Jan 23 1995 19:223
Harbaugh has crashed under every regime....

daryll
9.3386DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFree Whitey Bulger!Mon Jan 23 1995 19:257
    	Given the lack of quality NFL quarterbacks today I find it hard
    to believe that if someone thought Flutie could play in the NFL
    they wouldn't give him a chance.  When a coach's job is at stake
    he might ignore the double secret blackmail list that only Doug
    Flutie is on and live a little dangerously.
    
    				   /Don
9.3387HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 23 1995 19:349
  I'm sure the coaches believed that Flutie couldn't play and maybe he couldn't
but the one thing I never understood was if he couldn't play why was the
Patriots record so much better with him in the game than with him not in the
game? 

  Granted it was a short period of time, 4 or 5 games, and no doubt there were
other factors but he seemed to move the ball.

  George
9.3388SALEM::DODAStop Global WhiningMon Jan 23 1995 19:468
                     <<< Note 9.3387 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>

>  Granted it was a short period of time, 4 or 5 games, and no doubt there were
>other factors but he seemed to move the ball.

No one ever said he was unable to handoff well.

daryll
9.3389The big R word, or don't dare to be differentAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeMon Jan 23 1995 19:4612
    I don't find it hard to believe at all.  The coaching fraternity is
    very tight and cliquey (ask that RI reporter) and losing conventionally
    will always see a coach rehired in some capacity.  But to sign Flutie
    who's not 6'3 and up simply because he will probably win more games
    than anyone else and take you to the playoffs is still a big risk and
    the R word scares those guys.
    
    There's never been a coach's blacklist but why have a player,
    especially a qb who's labeled when you have excuses not to.  But the
    question really is the reverse of yours; Why not sign the guy who's had
    the success of Theisman and Moon?  It's not really for the Flutie
    supporters to answer.
9.3390HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 23 1995 19:474
  I remember him passing. Also, if he were just handing off, then why did the
team do better when he played then when he didn't play.

  George
9.3391DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFree Whitey Bulger!Mon Jan 23 1995 19:566
    	Gotcha, NFL coaches are toast if they're different.  You can
    punch out an offensive coordinator, publically trash your owner/boss
    walk away with burnout, sign million dollar bust quarterbacks, but
    if you give Doug Flutie a tryout, you're HISTORY!
    
    				   /Don
9.3392AKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeMon Jan 23 1995 20:198
    Ironically I gave some thought to your coach question and came up with
    Phoenix.  If Buddy knew Flutie he'd love to have him as Doug played
    very hard nosed and would be one of the few qbs who could play special
    teams (Yes, he threw his share of interceptions but one thing I liked
    was when he threw one he gleefully went after the culprit unlike the
    majority who wave the db into the endzone).
    
    Why weren't any of these bobosaurae interested in Charley Ward?
9.3393SALEM::DODAStop Global WhiningTue Jan 24 1995 11:236
My recollection is that Flutie put the ball up a dozen times per 
game at best. Those were John Stephens' career years, the few 
that he had. He had an above avg running game and the offense was 
geared to it. It was the '94 bears, with the strong D.

daryll
9.3394Come on....BSS::MENDEZTue Jan 24 1995 14:138
    You gotta be kidding...  Al Davis would sign flutie in a minute if
    he thouhgt he could play and win ball games.  DeBartalo would sign
    Flutie if he thought he could play.  Sheesh the bozo in Phoenix would
    sign him if he thought he could play.  That is not to belittle Doug,
    but the guy was not ready for the NFL.  Who knows he might be a good
    backup somewhere.  Don't  forget Flutie wans to start and that appears
    to be the CFL where he will start and be a star.
    
9.3395I HATE McMahon...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Tue Jan 24 1995 14:2114
|    was a rookie and second year player behind MacMahon whose main problem
|    then was injury but otherwise highly   rated.
                                          ^
You missed a word.                       OVER

Flutie has a perfect gig in Canada, and HE probably has
no interest in the NFL.

My favorite memory of his year as Pats QB:
Idiot McMahon made a comment during the week about 
Flutie being "America's Midget".  The Pats then go out
on Sunday, and kick da Bears' butts.

=Bob=
9.3396ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jan 24 1995 14:574
9.3397There's a logical fallacy there(begging the question?)AKOCOA::BREENI was all right for awhile..Tue Jan 24 1995 15:242
    If you think he "failed" and disagree with the rebuttal so far you're
    two cents is welcome
9.3398Part owner of his club?PCBUOA::EHSTue Jan 24 1995 15:438
    
    Speaking of Flutie, Is it true that he owns 8% of the ballclub he plays
    for in the CFL (Calgary??)? I also heard that he may own up to 15%
    after his 5 year contract exhausts.
    
    	IMO - He has definitely found "his place" in the CFL.
    
    	ED
9.3399HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 24 1995 15:519
  For what ever reason, Flutie would never be much more than a 2nd string QB in
the NFL or even a 3rd string holding for the kicker. But for some reason he's
got the right blend of talent to do really well in the CFL. It's not clear
that the other kick holders in the NFL would do as well as he's doing up there.

  At any rate, he'll be back in the NFL some day as an announcer. I wouldn't be
surprised to see him take over Monday Night football when Frank retires. 

  George 
9.3401WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Jan 24 1995 16:0929
    
    Everyon keeps saying "the reason he could never make it," or "he failed
    because..."  Grrrr.
    
    And you have to ask how so many coaches can collectively act so stodgy?  
    Same way so many fans can fans collectively refuse to see the facts...  
    
    I see people who will bare-faced tell me "How could 28 GM's all be wrong?"
    and then not answer when asked if they were all wrong about 1) using
    replacement players 2) not hiring black QB's earlier.

    Btw, Patriots 1988:

     o Steve Grogan starts sthe year with a win.  Then loses 3 straight.
     o Tom Ramsey comes in for week 5 against Indy.  He eventually gets 
       pulled and Doug replaces him to win the game with a 4th quarter rally.
     o Doug wins 6 of the next 8 games, despite Berry designing a game plan
       totally opposite to his strengths.
     o Berry switches to Eason.  Bizarre to pull a winning QB, but Berry 
       again re-iterates that he doesn't like being told what to do by 
       management (Flutie was brought in to get fans).  Berry proves this 
       point again by refusing to hire offensive and devensive coordinators.
     o We barely beat TB, and lose our playoff chances in the next loss to
       Denver.

    28 GM's were wrong.  Flutie could win in the NFL.  It's not a guess.
    It's a fact.
    
- Sean
9.3402ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsTue Jan 24 1995 16:1829
    
>    28 GM's were wrong.  Flutie could win in the NFL.  It's not a guess.
>    It's a fact.
    
    Hmmm... lots of different arguments posed here...
    
    1) Could Flutie win in the NFL?
    
    Well, yes.  He did win.
    
    2) Can Flutie win in the NFL now?
    
    Hard to say.  I suspect so, in the right situation.
    
    3) Was Flutie a good NFL quarterback?
    
    Also hard to say.  Winning isn't everything; if it was, we'd have to
    say Vinny Testaverde is the third best QB in the AFC.  I don't follow
    the Pats closely enough to know how the rest of the team looked at the
    time, but given that they'd been to the Super Bowl recently, it's at
    least possible that the supporting cast carried a mediorce-or-worse QB.
    
    4) Would Flutie be a good NFL QB now?
    
    Hmmm... I certainly wouldn't give up Young for him, but if my QB was
    someone like, say, Testaverde, I wouldn't mind Flutie as at least a
    short term QB.
    
    Joe
9.3403MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Tue Jan 24 1995 16:276
    >   He's got the looks but he also has the personality of a houseplant.
    
    	He should fit right in just fine with the current crew then.
    
    
    	billl
9.3404MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 24 1995 19:0014
    
      Certain Bostonians just won't let this Flutie thing go. They 
     like to forget when Flutie was in Chicago and Mike Ditka damn 
     near ripped his head off of his shoulders because Dougie would
     panic every time the defense even hinted at a blitz and Dougie
     would change the play. Fluite was much better off in New England 
     where his role was more limited and the Patsies had Jon Stephens
     running over people. The Pats won "despite Berry designing a game
     plan opposite" Doug's strenghts isn't quite right. If they had 
     played to Doug's strengths, they would have lost. Berry was no 
     genius but he was smart enough to know that he couldn't ride
     Flutie very far.
    
    
9.3405OLD1S::CADZILLA2CanyourollmeanotherBullDurhampleaseTue Jan 24 1995 19:133
    
    
    	Who's Doug Flutie?
9.3406MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 24 1995 19:245
    
    
    	>> Who's Doug Flutie?
    
           A shorter Steve Walsh.
9.3407Heisman envy?AKOCOA::BREENI was all right for awhile..Tue Jan 24 1995 20:036
    Ditka was ripping more than Flutie in those days including a certain
    mister Dent (not Bucky).  Mike in his calmer moments lauded Doug, at
    least effort-wise.
    
    My question is, other than mere height what is the big difference
    between Flutie's record CFL performances and say Moon's.
9.3408From GaulkeOURGNG::RIGGENNetworks Sales &amp; MarketingTue Jan 24 1995 20:0220
Date:	24-JAN-1995 13:44:06.01
From:	BSS::US3RMC::"0007115286@mcimail.com" "Steven Gaulke"
Subj:	hello
To:	jeff riggen <bss::riggen>

  Post it in sports.note:

     Chargers in a laugher.


% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: from inet-gw-3.pa.dec.com by us3rmc.pa.dec.com (5.65/rmc-22feb94) id AA02492; Tue, 24 Jan 95 12:46:45 -080
% Received: from gatekeeper.mcimail.com by inet-gw-3.pa.dec.com (5.65/10Aug94) id AA02894; Tue, 24 Jan 95 12:43:42 -080
% Received: by gatekeeper.mcimail.com (5.65/fma-120691); id AA16027; Tue, 24 Jan 95 20:47:19 GM
% Received: from mcimail.com by mailgate.mcimail.com id ba02732; 24 Jan 95 20:40 WE
% Date: Tue, 24 Jan 95 12:01 EST
% From: Steven Gaulke <0007115286@mcimail.com>
% To: jeff riggen <bss::riggen>
% Subject: hello
% Message-Id: <41950124170114/0007115286PJ2EM@MCIMAIL.COM>
9.3409ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jan 24 1995 20:417
9.3410ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysTue Jan 24 1995 21:136
    
    And judging by groaner's choice of NFL teams, he's a keen judge of CFL
    talent.  8^)
    
    
    brews
9.3411WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Jan 25 1995 00:3018
    
    >  Certain Bostonians just won't let this Flutie thing go. 
    
    Well, I don't let the Flutie thing go (when prompted), but I'm
    certainly not a Bostonian.  Hate the Celts and went to Syracuse when
    Flutie was on BC, so I was rooting consistently against Doug then.
    
    >   like to forget when Flutie was in Chicago and Mike Ditka damn 
    >   near ripped his head off of his shoulders because Dougie would
    >   panic every time the defense even hinted at a blitz and Dougie
    >   would change the play. Fluite was much better off in New England 
    
    Yeah, where he took revenge on said Ditka by throwing a TD bomb the
    first play of the game against Da Bears.  Revenge for the Super Bowl,
    Revenge for treating him like crap on Chitown, and best of all, Ditka
    went down for the count after that game.
    
    - Sean
9.3412talent wise Schlichter >> FlutieROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 02:2010
9.3413We got smoked but at least we dancedAD::HEATHPitchers and catchers report when???Wed Jan 25 1995 10:3212
    
    
      Paul...
    
      What does a second rate leauge have anything to do with New
    Englander's knowing anything about football?  I would venture
    to say we know as much/little as any other fan of any other NFL
    team.  What we New Englanders know and Clevelandites don't is
    the feeling of being in a Super Bowl.  I could describe it for
    you if you want.
    
    Jerry
9.3414ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 10:594
9.3415ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 11:027
9.3416What Do You Think?WMOIS::BUCKLEY_MWed Jan 25 1995 11:467
    		**********  Question of the Day **********
    
    	Can Alcorn States quarterback, Steve "Air" McNair be a 
    	franchise quarterback in the NFL?  ESPN's draft analyst
    	Mel Kiper feels "Air" McNair will be taken in by the 
    	Houston Oilers in the first round.  
    
9.3417CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnWed Jan 25 1995 11:519
 I doubt it. McNair may have the tools but them ole coaching woes about
 black QB's (on the same blacklist as Doug Flutie) the failure of Andre
 Ware and the lack 1-A experience has me thinking he's a 2 nd or 3 rd
 rounder. I don't agree with it but that's how I see it happening. If
 the Oilers are dead set on taking a QB I think they'll take Collins
 or Chad May.......

 mike
9.3418MEL KIPER IS O-U-TWMOIS::BUCKLEY_MWed Jan 25 1995 12:059
    	I agree with you 100%, I have seen McNair play once and maybe
    	I shouldn't make a judgement based on that but people are 
    	comparing him to Warren Moon and Randall Cunningham.  He does
    	have great arm strength and he hasn't seen defensive backs
    	like Deion, Woodson, Hurst, McDaniel, or Eric Allen.  In the game
    	I saw, he primarily passed out of the shotgun . . . on every down!
    	You won't see many QB's taken high in the draft this year, this
        will be a year for BIG lineman and RB's.
                                   
9.3419WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 12:187
    
    
    
           McNair = Andre Ware
    
    
          Good College QB, not a NFLer though
9.3420Let's keep away from racial comparisons, pleaseTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 12:419
    It's very interesting to me to see people comparing McNair to Warren
    Moon, Randall Cunningham, and in the last note, Andre Ware.  It
    couldn't be just because these four quarterbacks are black, is it?
    
    IMO, it's pretty tough to compare McNair to anybody, since most of us
    have only seen him play in at most one college game and one all-star
    game.  The little I've seen of him he reminds me of Dave Kreig.
    
    NAZZ
9.3421they didn't beat Da Bears in a preseason game 1st?SALEM::DODAStop Global WhiningWed Jan 25 1995 12:4718
    <<< Note 9.3411 by WONDER::REILLY "Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375" >>>

    
  >  Yeah, where he took revenge on said Ditka by throwing a TD bomb the
  >  first play of the game against Da Bears.  Revenge for the Super Bowl,
  >  Revenge for treating him like crap on Chitown, and best of all, Ditka
  >  went down for the count after that game.
   
   Whoa boy, I bet that really did. That Super Bowl title? 
   Forgotten. We've lost to Doug Flutie and the Patriots. That SB 
   title means nothing now, the Patriots have beaten us in a 
   regular season game a couple years later.

   Doug Flutie, redeemer of New England's pride.

   Get Real.

   daryll
9.3422Geeze, some guys have wicked short fuses...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 13:0320
9.3423SALEM::DODAStop Global WhiningWed Jan 25 1995 13:0921
Bob,

First off, I do not have a short fuse. Second, I wasn't replying to your note. 
Third read what was written below. It was a silly statement to 
make, wouldn't you agree?

Bowling night tonight, won't be there. Waiting for a sale on 
clues before I pick one up.

thanks
Daryll

    <<< Note 9.3411 by WONDER::REILLY "Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375" >>>
    
    Yeah, where he took revenge on said Ditka by throwing a TD bomb the
    first play of the game against Da Bears. ** Revenge for the Super Bowl,**
    Revenge for treating him like crap on Chitown, and best of all, Ditka
    went down for the count after that game.
    
    - Sean

9.3424Oh, in that case, I agree...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 13:128
Mea Culpa Daryll.

And I know you don't have a short fuse, I was kinda joking.

Let me know when that sale is, I'll go pick myself up a 
clue, I guess mine is worn out.

=Bob=
9.3425Sheesh, the guy's point was fairly clear...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 25 1995 13:2914
                         
    By the same token, someone should be able to use a little bit of
    artistic license with a simple phrase like "revenge for the Super Bowl" 
    without having his sanity questioned.  I knew what the guy meant, and
    it wasn't that the game would literally make people forget that game.
    I was at the game, and the fact is that it was a very big win in a
    very meaningful game for both teams.  For the Pats, the biggest win of 
    the 7 long seasons preceding this one.  That's not saying a whole lot 
    but 7 years between really big wins is still 7 years.  I'll never
    forget ol' Coach Dikka ranting and raving at his very worst on the 
    sideline in front of us...
    
    glenn
     
9.3426MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jan 25 1995 15:0212
    
  >> By the same token, someone should be able to use a little bit of
  >> artistic license 
    
     A little bit, yes. But stating that winning a regular season game,
     in any way, shape or form makes up for the disappointment and hum-
     liation of suffereing the worst SB defeat ever (at that time), is
     a whole lot of poetic license. In final analysis that win over the
     Bears meant nothing. The SB is however what they all play for.
     No comparison.
    
    
9.3427Go back to the papers of the time, "revenge" was big, in fun...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jan 25 1995 15:5025
    
  >> By the same token, someone should be able to use a little bit of
  >> artistic license 
  >  
  >   A little bit, yes. But stating that winning a regular season game,
  >   in any way, shape or form makes up for the disappointment and hum-
  >   liation of suffereing the worst SB defeat ever (at that time), is
  >   a whole lot of poetic license. In final analysis that win over the
  >   Bears meant nothing. The SB is however what they all play for.
  >   No comparison.
    
    In the final analysis it didn't mean much (I wouldn't say "nothing", 
    or you run the risk of saying the Pats' entire existence has meant
    nothing).  But at the time the game most certainly was built up as a 
    "let's show these Bears something" and it wasn't because the Bears 
    were just a great team.  There was a revenge factor.  When the original 
    author threw "revenge for the Super Bowl" into a list of factors 
    including Flutie's return engagement against the guy who cut him I 
    knew exactly what it meant because he didn't make it up; that's
    how it played here at the time.  Nothing terribly parochial about
    it either; you see this kind of harmless talk all the time, everywhere, 
    without anyone seriously believing that it equates to a Super Bowl win.
    
    glenn
    
9.3428WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Jan 25 1995 16:537
    
    Geez, some people sure take things over-literally when it suits their
    cause.  Anyway, thanks for noticing the exaggeration, glenn.  The
    rest...  lighten up.  I was just referencing the fact that the game
    got 3 bonuses for the price of one.
    
    
9.3429MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jan 25 1995 17:5010
    
      >> But at the time the game most certainly was built up as a 
      >> "let's show these Bears something" 

         Yup, we sure showed them. Maybe they'll think twice next time
         before they beat the living hell out of us in a SB. I'm sure
         that the Boston media might have played that angle up but it
         really is/was quite silly. 
    
    
9.3430SUPER BOWL XXIXWMOIS::BUCKLEY_MFri Jan 27 1995 09:4119
    	   NFC will make it 11 straight Super Bowl victories . . .
    
    		         San Diego Chargers       19
    	                                              F
    		         San Francisco 49ers      38
                               
    		            DECADE OF DOMINANCE       
            
                    1985  San Francisco 38, Miami 16
    		    1986  Chicago 46, NEW ENGLAND 10
                    1987  New York Giants 39, Denver 20
                    1988  Washington 42, Denver 10
                    1989  San Francisco 20, Cincinnati 16
                    1990  San Francisco 55, Denver 10
                    1991  New York Giants 20, Buffalo 19
                    1992  Washington 37, Buffalo 24
                    1993  Dallas 52, Buffalo 17
                    1994  Dallas 30, Buffalo 13
    
9.3431ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysFri Jan 27 1995 15:302
    Niners 46
    bolts  24
9.3432Game RECAP!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Mon Jan 30 1995 11:53169
9.3433METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Jan 30 1995 11:544
After all the predictions lasted week that SD would win this game I
expect to see note 50 get lots of replies today.

The Crazy Met
9.3434CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnMon Jan 30 1995 12:149
 dontcha just hate 2-point conversions????????

 ;^(

 I had Niners 9  Chargers 4  could won 1500 if they'd have kicked their extra
 points or San Fran had cared enough to stop one of them.........

 mike
9.3435BLOWN COVERAGEWMOIS::BUCKLEY_MMon Jan 30 1995 13:307
    I was 2 minutes and 25 seconds away from $5,000!!!!  What hurts is 
    the ABC camera crew was showing Coach Seifert getting the gatorade
    bath while San Diego scored there final TD so I didn't even know
    they scored until I heard the guy behind me going crazy because 
    he had that combination!   
    
    	Oh well it s*cks to be me   .   .   .
9.3436HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 30 1995 13:5460
  The ABC announcers were really funny last night during that last San Diego
drive when they were talking about how half of America was sitting on the front
of their couches. 

  Up by 23 points and well within a touchdown of not covering the spread the
49'ers had taken all the stars and 2nd string players out of the game and were
practically playing the cheer leaders on offense. If the Chargers had scored a
touchdown on their final drive, that would have cut the lead to 16 or 17 with
hardly any time left on the clock. 

  Somehow in the confusing and chaotic scramble the Chargers failed to score. 

  Everyone will have their favorites but for me the following was the number
one highlight of Super Bowl XXIX with little or no competition.



  BUD ...



  BUD ...



  BUD SER ...



  BUD SER ...



  BUD ...  WEI  ...



  BUD SER  ...  ... WEI 



  BUD SER  ...  WEI ...



  BUD ...  ...  WEI ... SER



  BUD WEI  ... SER



  BUD WEI  SER ... 



  BUD WEI  SER ... 

  George
9.3437CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 30 1995 14:0112
Yes, George, we do agree on that.  I loved that Budweiser frog commercial.

I also got a kick out of seeing the two McDonald's guys finally make it
there, with the little Larry/Michael flashback.

Thought the Coke and Pepsi driver commercial was cool too, and that clever
one with the kid sucking himself into the bottle....

Bud Bowl/Island guys was a let down......


'Saw
9.3438IMBETR::DUPREZMon Jan 30 1995 15:118
RE: .3435

Oh, you had SF 9/SD 8, too...

Glad I wasn't alone.

I also had SF 1/SD 0, with Doug Brien lining up for a FG before halftime.
I was cursing the holder for turning the laces the wrong way...
9.3439METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Jan 30 1995 15:246
I had SF 7 SD 9 in the 1st half and SF 8 SD 9 in the
2nd. 

oh well; next year.

The Crazy Met
9.3440ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysMon Jan 30 1995 15:315
    
    I was wondering how Brien must have felt after the game.  He really
    wasn't asked to do much, and what he did, he messed up.
    
    brews
9.3441IMBETR::DUPREZMon Jan 30 1995 15:566
I think the holder helped him mess up somewhat.  Laces were the wrong way -
on a long attempt a lot of things have to go perfectly.  (Well, more so than
on a short attempt...)

Roland
9.3442We Saw The BestSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Jan 30 1995 15:572
      Well, I suppose either this 49'er offense or the one that blew
      out Denver are the finest offenses the NFL has ever seen.
9.3443ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysMon Jan 30 1995 16:018
    
    
    One thing that amazed me was that as good as this offense was, it was
    still 100 yards shy of the 'skins record for most yards in a half, and
    the 'skins did most of that on the ground.  I had forgotten how that
    team had chewed up Denver.
    
    brews
9.3444METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Jan 30 1995 16:275
The 1983 Redskins were also an incredible machine on offense. Don't they still
hold the record for most points in an NFL season (not including playoffs)?

The Crazy Met
9.3445CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 30 1995 16:3210
I know that Young was dead-bang-on last night.  His reads seemed to be
perfect nearly every time.

He and Rice were almost sharing the same mind, it seemed, and he picked
the SD defense apart.

Unless I'm mistaken, they scored on 4 of their first five drives, yes?


'Saw
9.3446NFC>AFC againAWASH::MMARLANDMon Jan 30 1995 19:1715
The post game interview with the 9er's was very classy. I think it was Norton or
Rice who said he was more glad for Ricky Jackson hettting his first ring after
13 years, than getting a 3rd in a row or 4th ring.

Sanders getting popped was a highlight as well, even the announcers seemed to go
for it.

Now the million dollar question why is there such a discrepancy between the
AFC and NFC . They all draft form the same pool, play the same amount of games
and teams. What gives....





9.3447PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Jan 30 1995 19:247
    I don't think it's a case of the NFC>>AFC, but rather that there are 2
    teams that are far and away more committed to winning than the rest of
    the league - including the rest of the NFC.
    
    After Dallas and San Francisco, the talent drops dramatically.
    
    Mark.
9.3448HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 30 1995 19:2922
RE                     <<< Note 9.3446 by AWASH::MMARLAND >>>

>Now the million dollar question why is there such a discrepancy between the
>AFC and NFC . They all draft form the same pool, play the same amount of games
>and teams. What gives....

  As someone pointed out earlier there's not really all that much of a
difference between the AFC and the NFC. It's just that the NFC has these two
teams, the 49'ers and the Cowboys, who are better than anyone else. 

  Take a look at the other 4 teams that made the playoffs from the NFC, they
all got beaten by the Patriots this year. 

  Also I was keeping track for about 10 weeks and overall the AFC and NFC games
were pretty much even. I think the NFC was only leading by a couple games when
I stopped counting. 

  As for the 11 year streak, again over half of that is due to those two teams.
And even when the Giants and Skins won I don't think that overall the NFC was
all that much better than the AFC.

  George
9.3449HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 30 1995 19:315
  Whoooooo!!!! Notes collision and Mark and I agree!!!!!

  IT MUST BE TRUTH!!!!!!!

  George
9.3450ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysMon Jan 30 1995 22:0610
    It's not just the past 11 years, except for one year by the Raiders, you
    gotta go back to the 70's Steeler teams to find the last aFC team to
    win the championship.  Add that to the interconference winning record,
    and it's gotta be  more than coincidence.
    
    Kudos should also go to Bobby Ross for his comments after the game. 
    Barry Switzer shoulda had a notepad and pen, so he can learn what to
    say next time, and not blame it on the refs and the field.
    
    brews
9.3451MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Jan 30 1995 22:106
    Brews, that is true for the SB; but since 1970 the NFC has won 53% of
    the games against the AFC. Not exactly domination. It has been about
    that the last 11 years as well.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.3452ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysMon Jan 30 1995 22:127
    
    It may not be domination, but if you do whatever the test is for
    statistical significance, I'll bet that it is significant enough to
    prove who is better.  And I'll bet it gets  a little bit better when
    you factor out the great Steeler and Raider teams of the 70's.
    
    brews
9.3453USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jan 31 1995 14:158
The NFC produces teams that are champions...teams that have the players
and the type of game that obviously dominates in the Super Bowl.  Regular
season inter-conference play may be slightly more significant than pre-season
game results.

I heard it said yesterday that during this run of NFC domination, not only
did the NFC produce the best team, but the best two teams, each year (ie:
either NFC Championship game participant would have smoked the AFC rep).
9.3454MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Tue Jan 31 1995 14:2912
	>>Regular season inter-conference play may be slightly more 
	>>significant than pre-season game results

	Do the words over simplification mean anything to you?

	The Pre-season games mean absolutley squat and the regular 
	season games, be they inter-conference or intra-conference, are
	used to determine whether you are playing post season ball or
	calling for tee times.  I'd call that pretty significant.


	billl
9.3455IMOWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Tue Jan 31 1995 14:4112
    
    
       I disagree with the NFC runnerup smoking the AFC!!!
    
    1984  it woulda been the 16-2 dolphins vs the Bears
    85    Pats vs Rams (woulda been close
    87 Denver would have gave Minny a game. 
    88 Niners beat the Bengals 20-16 but they beat the bears 28-3 in the
    nfc championship.
    
    
       Chap
9.3456thanksHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 31 1995 15:068
>    87 Denver would have gave Minny a game. 

I think we should all give thanks that this never happened.

They'd probably still be playing since neither of them coulda actually
won the thang.

TTom
9.3457WLAF starts march hereMASALA::DWALLACETue Jan 31 1995 15:446
    I have a question one of you guys can check for me. 
    
    Can you post the scores for all the SF v Miami games from 1988-present
    please. Thanx in advance.
    
    Davie.
9.3458one gameHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 31 1995 15:536
The onlist one I could find in my semi-respectable stats is that San
Francisco beat Miami 27-3 in game 14 of the 92 season.

FWIW, the line was 8.

TTom
9.3459HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 31 1995 15:5424
  Yes the NFC is producing champions but it's not because of anything to do
with them being in the National Conference. It's nothing more than coincidence
that the best teams in the last decade all happen to be in the NFC just as it
was coincidence that the best teams in the '70s were in the AFC. 

  It's not like the American and National leagues in baseball where there are
different rules and different umpires, the Conferences in the NFL are just
arbitrary groupings of teams and by coincidence the good teams fell in one group
during the 70's and the other group ever since. 

  I guess the question is, should anything be done to help make the superbowl
more competitive. One suggestion that seems to be going around is to seed the
12 (or however many) teams that make the playoffs without regard to conferences
or divisions. Had that happened this time around, S.F. and Dallas would not
have met before the superbowl since they would have been the #1 and #2 seeds. 

  Considering how little the Conferences mean, maybe that's not a bad idea. Or
another idea would be to keep the 6 divisions and do away with the Conferences.
They could seed the division winners giving the top 4 of 6 bys for the 1st
round with the 1 and 4 seed on one side and the 2 and 3 seed on the other. 
Then they could pick 6 wildcards from the league rather than 3 from each
conference. 

  George
9.3460point is??????MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Tue Jan 31 1995 15:545
	Ok class, today's word is 'rhetorical'.



	billl
9.3461HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 31 1995 16:0212
Re            <<< Note 9.3460 by MKFSA::LONG "Close, but no cigar!" >>>

>                              -< point is?????? >-
>
>	Ok class, today's word is 'rhetorical'.

  You talk'en to me?

  This is just the NFC/AFC debate and a suggestion I heard for seeding the
playoffs, have I said something out of line?

  George
9.3462MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Tue Jan 31 1995 16:286
>>You talk'en to me?

	Nope.  Was a little slow responding to .3457.


	billl
9.3463how long should we wait for the current cycle to pass ?USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jan 31 1995 16:484
Eliminating Conferences, and seeding playoff teams would avoid 'cyclical'
conference domination which has led to boring NFL fans to tears on what
should be the ULTIMATE showdown in the biggest single game in American
sports.
9.3464a real long cycleHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoTue Jan 31 1995 16:543
How long did the American League go without winning a_All-Star game?

TTom 
9.3465ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysTue Jan 31 1995 17:0116
    <<< Note 9.3459 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>
    
   > ... It's nothing more than coincidencethat the best teams in the last
   > decade all happen to be in the NFC just as itwas coincidence that the
   > best teams in the '70s were in the AFC
    
    If it was 3-4 years, or maybe even 5-6 years I could see your point. 
    But it's been 11 years, and most of the games were a blowout of huge
    proportions.  Add to that the edge that the NFC has in interconference
    play over that same time frame, and it's not a coincidence.  As someone
    (Joe?) said earlier, almost always the 2nd best NFC team was better
    than what the AFC has had to offer as its champ.  It's just been too
    long to say that it was coincidence.
    
    
    brews  
9.3466DZIGN::ROBICHAUDSaveThePatriotsTue Jan 31 1995 17:127
    	Take away the "old" NFL teams that went over to the AFC and
    the AFC (old AFL) has won 7 Super Bowls since the first one.
    Raiders (3), Miami (2), New York (1) and Kansas City (1).  Good
    thing the merger brought NFL teams into the AFC or we would be talking
    total domination.
    
    				   /Don 
9.3467SB label is for show anyway...for games what would seeding add?EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 31 1995 17:4630
> Eliminating Conferences, and seeding playoff teams would avoid 'cyclical'
> conference domination which has led to boring NFL fans to tears on what
> should be the ULTIMATE showdown in the biggest single game in American
> sports.
    
    Substitute the words "NFC Championship" for "Super Bowl" and you still 
    get the same game.  As a fan, I don't mind seeing that game played one
    round earlier under conditions where much of the commercialism and 
    hype have been removed, better yet on somebody's home field with real
    home fans rather than in front of sterilized NFL-approved socialites
    and The World's Tackiest Halftime Performers.  The big losers are the 
    advertisers and the once-a-year Super Bowl party-goers, and if we're 
    going to get one inferior game either way, I almost take some perverse 
    pleasure in seeing these types pull their hair out after laying out the 
    thousands of dollars and thinking that in any way they're getting the 
    best of the great show that has been going on for the 20 weeks leading 
    up to the Bowl. 
    
    Besides, as long as the NFL plays imbalanced divisional and conference
    schedules that hide conference differentials, there's no guarantee that 
    the seeding system will make things any better.  This year the #2 seed
    might have been Pittsburgh.  It'd be interesting to see what seeding by
    record would have produced over the past 10 years and whether it'd have
    "worked".  Plus, aesthetically I think that throwing out the conference
    affiliations in the playoffs would give them that contrived NHL/NBA
    free-for-all feel...
    
    glenn
      
9.3468METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Jan 31 1995 17:514
There was at least 1 year where Buffalo would have gotten the #2 seed
but the NFC loser, SF, was better than them.

The Crazy Met
9.3469HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 31 1995 18:2226
RE     <<< Note 9.3465 by ONOFRE::MAY_BR "pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys" >>>

>    If it was 3-4 years, or maybe even 5-6 years I could see your point. 
>    But it's been 11 years, and most of the games were a blowout of huge
>    proportions.  

  No, it makes sense. It may sound less of a coincidence when you talk about 11
games but you are looking at the wrong number. Look at the number of teams that
we are talking about here. 

  There are two teams, the Cowboys and the 49'ers, that have become the two
dominant teams in the last 7-8 years who have accounted for most of the wins.
If you calculate the probability that if two teams emerge as super teams that
they will both be from the same conference I believe you will find that it is
50-50 (1 in 4 for the AFC, 1 in 4 for the NFC, 2 in 4 one of each). Even
throwing in the Redskins, the chances are still 1 in 4 that 3 super teams will
all be from the same conference. 

  As for the Giants, they played a really close game against the Bills so I'm
not sure they count. 

  And that's it, no other NFC team has been able to crack that group. So a 1 in
4 chance of 3 dominant teams being from the NFC is a bit of a long shot but not
that much. 

  George 
9.3470MSBCS::BRYDIEMike Lupica - Literary Giant!Tue Jan 31 1995 18:3414
    >> There are two teams, the Cowboys and the 49'ers, that have become 
    >> the two dominant teams in the last 7-8 years who have accounted for 
    >> most of the wins.
    
       Not really. The 'Boys have only won two in the stretch that you're
       talking about. So haven't the Skins and the Giants who pretty much
       personnified "NFC football". The other NFC team to have won it was 
       that incredibly dominant Bears team another stereotypical NFC team.
       Saying that SF and Dallas 'have accounted for most of the wins" is 
       correct on the surface but you could have said SF and the Giants or
       SF and the Redskins and still have been right. NFC dominance goes 
       deeper than just SF and Dallas.
    
9.3471Jones fe has shown sb#3 wasn't worth the money for himAKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 31 1995 18:4411
    Right the dominance as a league (nfc) was greater several years ago
    than now.  Free agency hit Dallas but strangely helped SanFran who took
    an agressive approach.
    
    The time to do the seeding plan was after the Patriots debacle(speaking
    of which this was the beginning of a long line of afc reps who probably
    weren't the most competive representative).  I'd guess that competition
    in the finale will begin again.
    
    Another cometition problem is in how much beyond the "glory" a
    superbowl is worth $$$ wise.
9.3472CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnTue Jan 31 1995 18:4716
 you tell em' Tommy.

 Joe, I think the biggest game of the year is the basketball championship
 game of the NCAA. Seems alot of people agree with me and for sure the 
 games are never boring. Only blowout in recent memory is UNLV pasting
 of Duke...........

 Unless my team is in it I have no interest in the Superbowl other than my
 pool numbers. For interest sunday could have been Denver vs. Minny and had
 no more interest to me than the matchup that was. The NCAA on the other
 hand is interesting and I can always get behind one of the teams and the
 fans are into reguardless of who the teams are.......

 mike
  
9.3473HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 31 1995 18:5722
RE      <<< Note 9.3470 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Mike Lupica - Literary Giant!" >>>

>       Saying that SF and Dallas 'have accounted for most of the wins" is 
>       correct on the surface but you could have said SF and the Giants or
>       SF and the Redskins and still have been right. NFC dominance goes 
>       deeper than just SF and Dallas.
    
  So fine Tommy, you caught me on yet another nit picking detail that doesn't
amount to a piss hole in the snow.

  Even if you have 4 teams taking turns at being a super team there is still a
1 in 8 chance of them all coming from the same conference. And I don't buy
the Giants as a super team, just as a good team who did well so that brings
us back to 1 in 4.

  That's well within the limits of this being a coincidence rather than
something fundamentally different about teams being in the NFC. 

  But I'm always open to different ideas. If there is something about the NFC
that makes it more likely to produce super teams, let's hear it?

  George
9.3474CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Tue Jan 31 1995 18:5824
Well, I'll probably piss everyone off, but I kind of like it the way
it is.  

Football is the only sport left, seemingly, where the doctors have pulled
out their scalpels and sterilized things into parity.   Four or five years
ago, the "dominant" division, with some of the best competition seemed to
be the NFC East, with the Giants, Washington, Philly, and Dallas, all
playing hardnosed, kickass football.

That seems to have shifted away now, as coaches have changed jobs, personnel
has rotated, and philosophies have changed.

One of the brightest hopes for the AFC is the combination of Parcells
in New England, and Bethard in SD.  They both espouse that NFC East
brand of football.

Sure, San Diego sucked in this years Super Bowl, but I don't think it will
be all that long again before the AFC wins another.

Also, don't forget, it's a one game championship game.  I did some checking
and of all the Super Bowls, only 5 were determined by 7 points or less....


'Saw
9.347511 in a row a coincidence?MSBCS::BRYDIEMike Lupica - Literary Giant!Tue Jan 31 1995 19:0921
  >> So fine Tommy, you caught me on yet another nit picking detail that 
  >> doesn't amount to a piss hole in the snow.

     These nitpicking details that you constantly refer to, George, are
     in reality errors in fact. I'd expect that George Maiewski, amateur
     solicitor, would be a little tighter with his facts than you often
     are. You're original statement was correct but misleading. 

  >> Even if you have 4 teams taking turns at being a super team there is 
  >> still a 1 in 8 chance of them all coming from the same conference. And 
  >> I don't buy the Giants as a super team, just as a good team who did well 

     They did well alright. They won the SB twice in the timespan being dis-
     cussed which is exactly how many Dallas won yet you choose to classify
     one as a 'super team' and not the other. 

  >> But I'm always open to different ideas. 

     No you're not. This will go round and round and not get anywhere. 
    
9.3476MSBCS::BRYDIEMike Lupica - Literary Giant!Tue Jan 31 1995 19:3818
  >> Football is the only sport left, seemingly, where the doctors have 
  >> pulled out their scalpels and sterilized things into parity.   Four 
  >> or five years ago, the "dominant" division...

  >> That seems to have shifted away now, as coaches have changed jobs, 
  >> personnel has rotated, and philosophies have changed.

     I don't think that's as a result of attempts to bring about parity. 
     Really it's a result of free agency and guys like Parcells and
     Bethard moving on to new challenges and more bucks. Certainly, there
     was no league mandate for them to move and bring up New England
     and SD from the dregs. Even with the new free agency and cap rules,
     it's the best run franchises that thrive. The attempts at parity 
     really succeed in creating mediocrity to the point where you have
     four teams from the NFC Central in the playoffs and none of them
     good enough to get to the NFC title game.
    
9.3477CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 01 1995 12:0726
>
>     I don't think that's as a result of attempts to bring about parity. 
>     Really it's a result of free agency and guys like Parcells and
>     Bethard moving on to new challenges and more bucks. Certainly, there
>     was no league mandate for them to move and bring up New England
>     and SD from the dregs. Even with the new free agency and cap rules,
>     it's the best run franchises that thrive. The attempts at parity 
>     really succeed in creating mediocrity to the point where you have
>     four teams from the NFC Central in the playoffs and none of them
>     good enough to get to the NFC title game.
>    

Right.  I didn't mean to convey the idea that Parcells and Bethard moved
out of a parity plan.

While it's true that four of the NFC Central teams made it to the dance
while being fairly mediocre, I'd think in the ideal parity situation
(which might be great for teams' bank accounts but sucks for fans) that
you wouldn't have two such dominant teams as Dallas and San Fran.

So, the NFL (thank Gawd) hasn't achieved total parity yet....I think.


'Saw


9.3478HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Feb 01 1995 12:1027
RE      <<< Note 9.3475 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Mike Lupica - Literary Giant!" >>>

>     These nitpicking details that you constantly refer to, George, are
>     in reality errors in fact. I'd expect that George Maiewski, amateur
>     solicitor, would be a little tighter with his facts than you often
>     are. You're original statement was correct but misleading. 

  No it was not misleading. My point is that from a statistical point of view
we should look at the number of winning teams, not the number of victories and
adding one more team didn't change things all that much. It's like making a
spelling error, yes it's an error but the point remains the same.

>     They [the Giants] alright. They won the SB twice in the timespan being dis-
>     cussed which is exactly how many Dallas won yet you choose to classify
>     one as a 'super team' and not the other. 

  So fine, they did alright. We have no argument there. But in my opinion they
didn't dominate teams the way Dallas did. Even still, within the guidelines of
this discussion having 4 teams rather than 3 doesn't make that much difference.

>     No you're not. This will go round and round and not get anywhere. 
    
  Look who's talk'en. Just yesterday I admitted I was wrong about the Celtics
because I didn't realize how the salary cap worked. When was the last time that
you admitted making a mistake in a SPORTS debate?

  George
9.3479PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Feb 01 1995 12:579
>  Look who's talk'en. Just yesterday I admitted I was wrong about the Celtics
>because I didn't realize how the salary cap worked. When was the last time that
>you admitted making a mistake in a SPORTS debate?
    
    How about Tuesday? (hint: see his p-name)
    
    Mark.
    
    
9.3480wCAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 01 1995 13:3651
>
>  So fine, they did alright. We have no argument there. But in my opinion they
>didn't dominate teams the way Dallas did. Even still, within the guidelines of
>this discussion having 4 teams rather than 3 doesn't make that much difference.
>

Well, dominate is relative.

In 1986, the Giants went 14-2 in the regular season.  They lost to Dallas
in a close one in Game 1.  They lost one that they SHOULD have won in Seattle
in Game 5.   The season's turning point, IMO, was on the 4 and 14 (or so)
in Minnesota.  They went for it, Simms hitting one of the wideouts on the
sideline, and won the game.

In the playoffs that year, they beat San Francisco 49-3, then, in a wind
blown game in the Meadowlands, chose to kick off to Washington, to get the
wind, and they beat the Jay Schroeder led Redskins 17-0.  So, heading into
the Super Bowl, they were beating their opponents 66-3.

In the Super Bowl, they were losing 10-9 at the half, but beat the Broncos
like a rented mule, 39-20.  The score was closer than it seemed, because
the Broncos got a late TD.


I guess our definition of domination is different, because to me, the 1986
Giants pretty much dominated things right up till the time they accepted
the Lombardi Trophy.


In 1990, the Giants got off to a 10-0 start, then promptly lost four games
in a row.  They won their last two, for a 12-4 finish, winning the NFC East.
They played Chicago in the Meadowlands, and beat them 31-3.  Then they
travelled to San Francisco, and the two teams slugged it out.  The Giants
didn't score a TD, but beat San Francisco 15-13 on the leg of Matt Bahr.

We all know they then played in the closest Super Bowl ever, beating
Buffalo 20-19.




Did they dominate like Dallas?  Looking purely at the football aspects, I'd
say yes, they did.  They don't get the press that Dallas gets, which is
surprising since New York is *THE* media center in the US, I'd say.


Granted, I'm a Jints fan, but I think the record speaks for itself....


'Sa

9.3481CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnWed Feb 01 1995 13:4114



>Did they dominate like Dallas?  Looking purely at the football aspects, I'd
>say yes, they did.  They don't get the press that Dallas gets, which is
>surprising since New York is *THE* media center in the US, I'd say.


 that's cause they don't have JJ and JJ owning and coaching them and promoting
 their supposed greatness. Or have mouths like Michael, Emitt and BoyToy.....

 mike

9.3482CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 01 1995 13:5122
> that's cause they don't have JJ and JJ owning and coaching them and promoting
> their supposed greatness. Or have mouths like Michael, Emitt and BoyToy.....

That's true.


I think part of that was due to Parcells.  I remember footage of him yelling
at the lineman late in a game, (late in the season or playoffs) for celebrating
early.  He hated that.

Another example is the story I love of Phil Simms taking a cab ride to the
Super Bowl, with a couple of the offensive lineman.  I think it was
Bart Oates (or maybe Brad Benson) who said later that Phil told them in the
cab that he felt like he was going to have a good game that day.  He had the
3rd best passing day in the history of the NFL.

I can't help but feel that some of the players in the 90s would have been
shouting that to any member of the press who'd listen.....


'Saw

9.3483MSBCS::BRYDIEMike Lupica - Literary Giant!Wed Feb 01 1995 13:5731
  >> My point is that from a statistical point of view we should look 
  >> at the number of winning teams, not the number of victories and
  >> adding one more team didn't change things all that much. 

     "From a statistical point of view" five different NFC teams have 
      won the SB in the last 11 years and zero AFC teams have. In those 11
      years, it could be argued that in at least 7 the second best team
      was also from the NFC. You're argument seems to be that you can't
      statistically prove NFC domination because X team from the NFC didn't 
      win the SB then immediately fade out of sight so that Y team from the
      NFC could step to the fore and win it and in the course of 11 years
      11 different teams would have won it. 

  >> So fine, they did alright. We have no argument there. But in my opinion 
  >> they didn't dominate teams the way Dallas did. 
 
     In 1986 the Giants lost two games all season and won the SB by 32 points.
     If that ain't dominating then what is?


   >> Even still, within the guidelines of this discussion having 4 teams 
   >> rather than 3 doesn't make that much difference.

      It's 5 teams not 4 or 3.

   >> Look who's talk'en. Just yesterday I admitted I was wrong about the 
   >> Celtics because I didn't realize how the salary cap worked. 

      It's "talkin'" not "talk'en".
  
    
9.3484dominating Giants !USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 01 1995 13:581
what they said....
9.3485HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Feb 01 1995 14:0715
RE      <<< Note 9.3483 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Mike Lupica - Literary Giant!" >>>

  Hey Tommy, I got some sun flower seeds in my office, how about munching a
few.

  You want 5 teams? Ok fine, given no advantage at all there is a 1 in 16
chance that 5 dominate teams will come from the same division. Still within
the range of possibility

  Don't like that, fine. Now it's your turn. If it's not coincidence that the
NFC has won 11 in a row then what is it? Rules that favor good teams? No, the
NFC uses the same rules. Officials? No, same organization controls the
officials. I give up, what? 

  George
9.3486More like 8 or 9 "teams", at 1 in 100 or more...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 01 1995 15:0048
                 
> You want 5 teams? Ok fine, given no advantage at all there is a 1 in 16
> chance that 5 dominate teams will come from the same division. Still within
> the range of possibility
    
    It's 1 in 16 but the number only gets larger when you consider that 
    three of those teams (San Fran, New York, and Washington) reloaded and
    won again years apart with significantly changed teams.  In San Fran's
    case they won it all four or more years apart with _three_ very 
    different squads (as did Washington if you consider their SB win that 
    came before the single AFC win over the last 14 seasons, plus add 
    another for San Fran under the same criteria).  Your position that this
    could be due to "random  chance" is simply not tenable, George.  The
    imbalance is due to stability and commitment by the front offices of
    this handful of franchises that was not matched by any franchise in
    the AFC and more pertinent to the argument has _still_ not been
    matched.  Of the big four (San Fran, Dallas, New York, and Washington)
    I would say that only Washington may have dropped out for good (for a
    long while) because they've lost both Gibbs and Beathard, and because 
    more so than the others they did win somewhat in spite of a
    psychopathic owner.
    
    From Mike C:
    
> that's cause they don't have JJ and JJ owning and coaching them and promoting
> their supposed greatness. Or have mouths like Michael, Emitt and BoyToy.....
    
    Since when have Emmitt and Troy had excessively big mouths?  Neither
    of these two could ever hope to match Lawrence Taylor's in a jawing
    session.  I've always hated the Cowboys and that hasn't changed because 
    of the JJs but the bashing of these two players has become tiresome.  
    Fact is, forget even about talent and publicity, like LT each of these 
    guys may be the _toughest_ (that quality we love in football players, 
    even if they happen to be Giants) in the NFL at his position and, as
    opposed to LT, both are consummate professionals far as I can see.
    
    By any objective standard the Cowboys are/were more dominant than the 
    Giants starting with the fact that they may not be done yet.  Even if
    they are, they truly dominated the past two years.  The Giants did not
    dominate for more than one year, and even though I was rooting for 
    them, the 1990 Giants definitely were not dominant and more precisely 
    were the luckiest and therefore least dominant champions over the 
    history of the Super Bowl years (not a slur; "lucky" defined as "closest 
    to elimination only to pull it out in improbable fashion"-- see NFC 
    Championship Game, not to mention the Super Bowl itself). 
    
    glenn
    
9.3487CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 01 1995 15:1326
>    history of the Super Bowl years (not a slur; "lucky" defined as "closest 
>    to elimination only to pull it out in improbable fashion"-- see NFC 
>    Championship Game, not to mention the Super Bowl itself). 
    
I don't think LUCK and improbability had anything to do with it.

In the NFC Championship game, they did what they needed to do to win
it -- force a turnover and move the ball into field goal range.

In the Super Bowl, they did what they needed to do to win -- stop Thurmon
Thomas short enough to force a FG that was beyond their range.
If the Giants don't stop Thurmon Thomas and he gains two more yards,
then what's-his-face makes that FG.  They did stop him, and the rest is
history.

Actually, to ME, THE play in that Super Bowl was the Giants wideout
"rumblin and stumblin, and ramblin and scramblin" on the 4th down play
to get the first down.


Did the Giants dominate over several years, as in repeat?  No.  But they
were always in the hunt.


'Saw

9.3488CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnWed Feb 01 1995 15:2114
 Ok Glenn maybe not mouths but ego-manics and self promoting bums comes to
 mind. Every time I turn around I see one of them in some commercial. 
 Emitt's playing at the detriment to the team when he's hurt to chase some
 records. BoyToy shuts out Irvin earlier in the year cause Irvin had the
 gonads to questions his decision making.

 I'll conceed that Emitt might be the toughest at his posistion but the
 Boytoy? Get Real! Let's talk Billy Joe Tolliver or some other poor slob
 that isn't afforded the protection that Troy has. Stan Humphries is also
 another fine canidate for the toughest....

 mike    

9.3489EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 01 1995 15:2833
    
>>    history of the Super Bowl years (not a slur; "lucky" defined as "closest 
>>    to elimination only to pull it out in improbable fashion"-- see NFC 
>>    Championship Game, not to mention the Super Bowl itself). 
>    
> I don't think LUCK and improbability had anything to do with it.
>
> In the NFC Championship game, they did what they needed to do to win
> it -- force a turnover and move the ball into field goal range.
    
    I think if you're completely objective about it, you'd agree that there
    was a whole lot of "luck" in that "force a turnover" part, when the
    opponent did so while in the process of running out the clock when the
    turnover was absolutely the only thing that could beat them at that
    point.  I still have no real explanation for it nor I suspect does
    Roger Craig.  This is as much luck as you're ever going to see at the 
    end of such a championship football game short of a ball bouncing off
    someone's head in crazy and unexpected fashion (see the Immaculate
    Reception).  Nothing wrong with it; it is occasionally a very big part
    of the game, in this case a huge part.
    
    But the main point is that I do not consider the 1990-vintage Giants 
    a dominant team, but I'd agree with you based on excellence over a
    number of years they had a dominant organization.  I wouldn't make
    this latter distinction based entirely on Super Bowl wins or even
    appearances because you have to consider the competition.  No question 
    that the Giants organization was stronger than any from the AFC 
    including teams like Denver and Buffalo that made it that far more
    times.
    
    glenn
     
                                            
9.3490Give the guy his due for once-- he is Oklahoma-boy TOUGHEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 01 1995 15:3213
    
> I'll conceed that Emitt might be the toughest at his posistion but the
> Boytoy? Get Real!
    
    Absolutely and I've heard the same assessment from more than one
    analyst.  I'm not talking about just being able to come back from
    severe beatings for coming back's sake, but to do so _and_ perform
    at a high level.  The NFC Championship Game was a perfect example.
    It's high pain tolerance and focus and concentration, not just high
    pain tolerance.
    
    glenn
    
9.3491HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Feb 01 1995 15:3624
RE                     <<< Note 9.3486 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>

>Your position that this
>    could be due to "random  chance" is simply not tenable, George.  The
>    imbalance is due to stability and commitment by the front offices of
>    this handful of franchises that was not matched by any franchise in
>    the AFC and more pertinent to the argument has _still_ not been
>    matched.  

  Actually this supports my argument, not the one I'm arguing against.

  The position that I am arguing against it that there is something about the
being in the NFC that makes teams more likely to win. My argument is that it is
coincidence that teams capable of winning are in the NFC and that the fact that
they are in the NFC has nothing to do their success.

  I agree with your point that the reason these teams keep coming back to win
has to do with their superior front office but again the fact that those front
offices all ended up in the NFC is coincidence.

  But I'm still waiting for someone to come up with something about the NFC
which would favor their teams over teams unlucky enough to be in the AFC.

  George
9.3492CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 01 1995 16:2057
>    I think if you're completely objective about it, you'd agree that there
>    was a whole lot of "luck" in that "force a turnover" part, when the
>    opponent did so while in the process of running out the clock when the
>    turnover was absolutely the only thing that could beat them at that
>    point.  I still have no real explanation for it nor I suspect does
>    Roger Craig.  This is as much luck as you're ever going to see at the 
>    end of such a championship football game short of a ball bouncing off
>    someone's head in crazy and unexpected fashion (see the Immaculate
>    Reception).  Nothing wrong with it; it is occasionally a very big part
>    of the game, in this case a huge part.

I don't have a highlight tape from 1990, so memory may be hazy here, but
didn't Craig take a helluva hit from LT?

I don't know about you, but I think I'd experience a week of barium 
enemas WHILE getting my teeth scraped than take a hit from LT.

And they weren't necessarily "running out the clock", not in what I'd
term running out the clock.  They still had to make yards and move the
ball.  I don't believe they were in a situation where they could afford
to punt and give the Giants back the ball.   I could be wrong.

Again, wish I had that highlight tape.

    
>    But the main point is that I do not consider the 1990-vintage Giants 
>    a dominant team, but I'd agree with you based on excellence over a
>    number of years they had a dominant organization.  I wouldn't make
>    this latter distinction based entirely on Super Bowl wins or even
>    appearances because you have to consider the competition.  No question 
>    that the Giants organization was stronger than any from the AFC 
>    including teams like Denver and Buffalo that made it that far more
>    times.
    
I'd agree on the 1990 team.  They started out great.  10-0 is nothing to
sneeze at.

I saw the 1990 team as a team in a rebuilding stage.  NOT the kind of
rebuilding after everyone leaves, but a team that was VERY good, but building
towards a team that could be GREAT.  They needed a litte more of this, and a
little more of that etc, but they weren't there yet.

Where they could have gone, had Parcells stayed is anyone's guess.  But
we know what did happen -- the won the Bowl, Parcells left on top, and
whatever good was left behind was destroyed by the Giants version of
Bob Palmer, Ray Handley.....



One thing I DO remember from the playoffs following the 1986 season was
the Niners passing to Jerry Rice on the opening drive, Rice splitting the
safeties much as he did last Sunday, and while running in the open field,
FUMBLING the ball, and the Giants recovered.   NEVER thought I'd see that!

'Saw
                                            

9.3493Follow the buckAKOCOA::BREENWed Feb 01 1995 16:3416
    I think George is saying why is this (eerie success) only happening to
    nfc clubs.  I've noticed one factor in the five clubs involved and that
    is our old friend mr. bucks.
    
    Dallas,N.Y,Chicago and Washington are perennial sell-outs, win or lose
    and are able to carry over profits.  Some of their competition like
    Buffalo,New England and Oakland/LA have to be much more budget
    conscious.
    
    Looking at N.E. we can certainly see where a tight-fisted organization
    sacfificed top tier status (attainable by resigning Haynes,Gray...)to
    retain a mere competitive status (not to speak of the Fairbanks saga).
    
    Sometimes the spending can be in the form of secondary things like
    quality of assistant coaches, specialists and special equipment,
    charter vs commercial air.
9.3494ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Feb 01 1995 16:364
9.3495GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Wed Feb 01 1995 16:374
    
    	The sellout arguement doesn't hold for Denver...
    
    Claybone
9.3496USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 01 1995 16:4316
>has to do with their superior front office but again the fact that those front
>offices all ended up in the NFC is coincidence.

Coincidence ?  These franchises weren't put in the NFC through some lottery.
The NFC has the original NFL franchises.  I think solid organizations are
grounded in historical foundation, which leads to a clear understanding
of expectations.  Three of the 4 (Dallas, the Giants, Wash) all have rich,
winning traditions which I believe drive all of the organization's decisions.
Any other NFC team has a very high standard to meet just to get out of the
NFC and get to the SB.  Debartolo has met the standard (after falling into
a championship run, courtesy of Walsh and Montana).  Chicago resurrected its
past glory, but the cast of characters (Ditka, Buddy, McMahon) were too
volatile to remain together.  GB is TRYING to get up there too.

The last 5-6 years the AFC's standard has been set by Buffalo.  And that
level of achievement has proven to be too low.
9.3497besides I hated Denver while most of you were in grammar schoolAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeWed Feb 01 1995 16:4710
    I agree Denver is unique.  For an excuse there I would offer their
    unique home-field advantage which may have helped them get furthur than
    their talent warranted.
    
    Cleveland, yes, has all the arguments of Dallas, N.Y - they were inches
    from the superbowl and I thought at the time would have been a much
    better candidate.  But, they didn't do it.
    
    Again when we talk the money we come into the Kraft thing where success
    = $loss or does it.
9.3498HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Feb 01 1995 16:4719
RE                    <<< Note 9.3496 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>Coincidence ?  These franchises weren't put in the NFC through some lottery.
>The NFC has the original NFL franchises.  I think solid organizations are
>grounded in historical foundation, which leads to a clear understanding
>of expectations.  

  Fine sound good. In fact that was the original reason for why the Suprebowl
would fail. That upstart AFL had no chance against the mighty teams from the
NFL.

  But that doesn't account for one minor detail. How do you explain the '70s
when the AFC dominated the superbowl. Not a streak but starting with Superbowl
III and going thorough the 70's they seem to have won more often than not.

  It's coincidence that has placed good management in the NFC and that is the
reason for the NFC streak.

  George
9.3499WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Wed Feb 01 1995 16:5912
    
    
    
             Another reason for The NFC's dominance in the past decade has
    got to be AL Davis's Scenility. The man has lost it and he doesn't
    realize it.
    
          With the talent that has gone in and out of LA in the past 7 or
    so years, and with him running things behind puppett coaches!!!
    
    
         The man needs to go out to pasture!
9.3500You're not aloneAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeWed Feb 01 1995 17:144
    Some say the same about Red with the Celtics.  Though in the Raiders
    case there's never any doubt about who's making final decisions whereas
    here it appears Red keeps quiet and then all of a sudden makes a
    decision which is final and perhaps undiscussed prior.
9.3501MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Wed Feb 01 1995 17:2219
	The Steelers have also sold out since the early '70s and have
	had some very lean years in the past 25.  So much for the 
	"constant sellout" theory.

	The Steelers were also one of the original NFL teams that 
	were put in the AFC when it originated.  So not all current
	AFC teams are from the AFL.

	I just have trouble following the Hal-logic that says since
	a NFC team has won the last 11 Super Bowls, then the NFC as
	a whole is a stronger conference than the AFC.  That's as silly 
	as saying that during the 70's when the AFC team dominated the
	Big Dance, the AFC, as a conference, was better than the NFC.

	Sorry, it just don't wash with me.



	billl
9.3502CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 01 1995 17:2517
>Coincidence ?  These franchises weren't put in the NFC through some lottery.
>The NFC has the original NFL franchises.  I think solid organizations are
>grounded in historical foundation, which leads to a clear understanding
>of expectations.  Three of the 4 (Dallas, the Giants, Wash) all have rich,
>winning traditions which I believe drive all of the organization's decisions.


There's got to be something to this.  If you look at some of the teams
in the NFC who came in via expansion, they've never really amounted to
much:  Tampa Bay (originally AFC for one year, then switched with Seattle),
Atlanta, New Orleans.

Minnesota was an expansion team, but they have done well, and of course
Dallas, but they had an exceptional coach in Tom Landry.


'Saw
9.3503USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 01 1995 17:557
>  But that doesn't account for one minor detail. How do you explain the '70s
>when the AFC dominated the superbowl.

Baltimore and Pittsburgh (both original NFL teams with either or both a
winning history or solid -Rooney- organization) accounted for 5 SB
championships during the stretch you're talking about.  Whenever Terry
Bradshaw talks about the Steelers' dynasty, he ALWAYS mentions Mr. Rooney.
9.3504CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 01 1995 18:2745
I got really curious, based on the discussion of blowouts in the Super Bowl,
so I decided to check and see how many of the NFL Championship Games
were decided by 7 points or less.  

Here's what I came up with:


1933		Chicago Bears 		23	NY Giants 	21	+2
1937		Washington Redskins     28	Chicago Bears	21	+7
1938		NY Giants		23	Green Bay	17	+6
1944		Green Bay 		14	New York	 7	+7
1945		Cleveland Rams		15	Washington      14	+1
1947		Chicago Cardinals	28	Philadelphia    21	+7
1948		Philadelphia		 7	Chicago Cards    0      +7
1950		Cleveland Browns	30	LA Rams		28 	+2
1951		LA Rams			24	Cleveland	17	+7
1953		Detroit			17	Cleveland	16 	+1
1958		Baltimore		23	NY Giants	17 (OT) +6
1960		Philadelphia		17	Green Bay	13	+4
1963		Chicago			14	NY Giants	10	+4
1966		Green Bay		34	Dallas		27	+7
1967		Green Bay		21	Dallas		17	+4
1969		Minnesota		23	LA Rams		20	+3

16 out of 37 "close" games....


There were also some bigger blowouts than any we've seen in the Super Bowl

1940		Chicago	Bears		83	Washington	 0	+73
1954		Cleveland		56	Detroit		10	+46
1956		NY Giants		47	Chicago		 7	+40
1957		Detroit			59	Cleveland	14	+45
1961		Green Bay		37	New York	 0	+37



No one in a Super Bowl has ever been shutout, but in the history of the
NFL Championship game, there were 6 shutouts.....



Just more grist for the mill....

'Saw
9.3505May have to drag out the old SI tonight...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 01 1995 19:5725
> I don't have a highlight tape from 1990, so memory may be hazy here, but
> didn't Craig take a helluva hit from LT?
    
    Not to belabor this trivial point but for historical purposes, as I
    remember it there was nothing very spectacular about the hit.  It 
    was a good hard tackle in heavy traffic inside the line of scrimmage,
    perhaps, but nothing devastating, and the fumble was a combination of 
    Craig getting a little careless and LT finding the right spot.  San
    Fran was definitely running out the clock as this occurred near
    midfield with ~2 minutes to play (pretty sure that one or at most two 
    more first downs and it was automatic kneeldown time), and the Giants 
    only had to move the ball 20-25 yards before Matt Bahr made the 
    winning FG on the _very last play_ of the game.  No fumble and just a 
    clean punt and it would have taken a minor miracle, 40 more yards of 
    field position in a minute or so with no timeouts to set up a long
    field goal.  Not impossible but I still think that this is the closest
    that an eventual SB champion has ever come to elimination before 
    averting it (not that this matters to anyone outside of San Fran; in
    fact it probably only makes it all the sweeter to Giants' fans-- it's
    still astonishing that a team could win a conference championship game
    without scoring a TD). 
    
    glenn
    
9.3506MSE1::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Feb 01 1995 21:564
    Wasn't SF going for a threepeat in 1990??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.3507CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnThu Feb 02 1995 12:5217
>>    Wasn't SF going for a threepeat in 1990??
    
   that's what they thought...hahahaaaa

   Giants we're definately lucky here but they do deserve credit for
   forcing the fumble. For making the play they absolutely had to make.
   I think you can make a good case for just how dominant they were in
   the fact that Simms went down, Hoss took over and they still won it
   all. Certainly don't think SF could have won without Young this year
   or Joe in the past. Dallas without the Boytoy? Maybe cause of Emitt
   but post-season has been Troy's time to shine so probably not. Skins
   won with Rypien and Williams so they probably could have won with
   anybody.........

   ;^)    

9.3508USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 02 1995 13:0110
>   I think you can make a good case for just how dominant they were in
>   the fact that Simms went down, Hoss took over and they still won it
>   all. Certainly don't think SF could have won without Young this year
>   or Joe in the past.

SF's offensive style depends on the QB more than any other.  The Giants
play on offense truly depends on all 11 guys to be successful.  Any one
player goes down, they aren't killed by it.  Jumbo missed most of last
year and they still had a great year.  Hampton was out for 3 or 4 games
this year, and I believe that was during their 5-0 start.
9.3509CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnThu Feb 02 1995 13:045
 actually Joe the Giants started out 3-0 this year dropped their next 7
 and won their last 6. Hampton was out mostly during the loosing streak.

 mike
9.3510MSBCS::BRYDIEMike Lupica - Literary Giant!Thu Feb 02 1995 13:1412
  >> SF's offensive style depends on the QB more than any other.  
    
     The multiple weapons that SF has and the quick short rhythm
     passes that they throw make it easy for just about any QB to 
     thrive. That's why Young, who was shipped from Tampa Bay when the
     Bucs drafted Testaverde, could step in and thrive in SF and Bono,
     who hasn't done anything since, could look like the second coming
     of Joe Willie. Similarly although he's a very good QB in his
     own right Troy has benefitted from being situated behind the
     best offensive line in the league, in front of two of the best 
     backs and between two of the best receivers.
9.3511The details...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Feb 02 1995 14:1324
    
    Just for the record... in the 1990 NFC Championship Erik Howard forced
    the fumble, not LT (LT recovered as the ball popped up right at him).
    The Giants took over at their own 43 with 2:35 remaining.  Before the
    fumble it was looking grim for the Giants, real grim.  The Giants had
    kicked a FG with about 5 minutes left but the get-3-and-hold-'em 
    strategy looked dead as the 49ers had already picked up a few first 
    downs and were looking at running even another play which at worst 
    would have resulted in another good minute gone before the punt (the 
    fumble stopped the clock on the change of possession two plays
    prematurely).  This is all pretty consistent with my recollection of an
    absolutely devastating and really inexcusable mistake on Craig's part
    and I'll bet that if Giants' fans scan the brain cells real hard 
    they'll remember that they had to have been thinking "well it's been 
    a good season" or some such by that point.
    
    Troy Aikman is one of the top 3-4 QBs in the NFL no matter how you
    slice it.  I don't go along with this "overrated" stuff and never 
    have.  I actually think more of him now after this season when he
    performed well under much more adversity than before when he was only
    damn near perfect under less trying circumstances.
    
    glenn
    
9.3512MSBCS::BRYDIEMike Lupica - Literary Giant!Thu Feb 02 1995 14:1910
    
    
      Lost in all of the talk about the SF-Giants NFC title game is
     that the Giants held the "best offense on the planet" (at that
     time) to 13 points.
    
      As far as Troy being overrated goes, I think calling him one
     of "the 3-4 best QBs in the league" pretty much says it all.
     One of the best, yes. "All World", no. Troy is still only the 
     3rd or 4th best player on his own team.
9.3513EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Feb 02 1995 14:3710
                                
>     As far as Troy being overrated goes, I think calling him one
>     of "the 3-4 best QBs in the league" pretty much says it all.
>     One of the best, yes. "All World", no. Troy is still only the 
>     3rd or 4th best player on his own team.
    
    One of the 3-4 best leaves it at Young, Marino, Aikman, maybe still
    Montana when he's 100%.  Choose whatever words you want but barring
    disastrous injury that kind of company gets you into the Hall of 
    Fame which Aikman will make and which he _will_ deserve.
9.3514Aikman = Greenwell ... The early years!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Thu Feb 02 1995 14:479
    
    
    
         After 4 seasons you already have Aikman in the Hall of Fame? Give
    me a break! Whats his record when Emmitt doesn't start? When some of
    his talent leaves this year ie.(either Irvin or Harper) we'll see how
    good he really is.
    
         Two more concussions and he'll be retiring!
9.3515MSBCS::BRYDIEMike Lupica - Literary Giant!Thu Feb 02 1995 14:493
    
      C'mon, Chappy. If Aikamn was on the Buccaneers, they'd be the
     ones with the two SB rings!
9.3516:^)USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 02 1995 14:524
>      C'mon, Chappy. If Aikamn was on the Buccaneers, they'd be the
>     ones with the two SB rings!

Let's not get carried away....
9.3517EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Feb 02 1995 14:5419
    
>               -< Aikman = Greenwell ... The early years!!!!!!! >-
    
    Yeah right, Chap.  This speaks for itself...
    
>   After 4 seasons you already have Aikman in the Hall of Fame?
    
    No I don't already have him in the HOF.  I said "barring disastrous
    injury" which in Aikman's case is a possibility.  What I'm saying is
    that Aikman's talent is obvious and undeniable just as was Montana's
    or Marino's after 4-5 years when it would have been completely
    reasonable to talk about either of those two as future HOFers.  

    The BoyToy Myth is SPROTSdelusion rooted in a hatred of the Cowboys
    that is not supported by 99% of what I've seen heard or read in the
    real world...
    
    glenn
    
9.3518WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Thu Feb 02 1995 15:096
    
    
    
            Glen what color is the sky in "your" real world?
    
    Chap
9.3519ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysThu Feb 02 1995 15:1411
    > I just have trouble following the Hal-logic that says since a
    >NFC team has won the last 11 Super Bowls, then the NFC as a
    >whole is a stronger conference than the AFC.  That's as silly        
    >as saying that during the 70's when the AFC team dominated the       
    >Big Dance, the AFC, as a conference, was better than the NFC.
    
    THe 11 consecutive Superbowl victories (with an *average* margin of
    victory greater than 20 points) AND a history of interconference
    W-L winning.
    
    brews 
9.3520still say he's top 5 to 10CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnThu Feb 02 1995 15:2514
dam straight the boytoy stuff is a ::sports delusion fueled by cowboy hatred.
thanks for noticing............

given the talent at his disposal he should have higher numbers but given that
he only throws 20 or so times a game when Emitt is healthy maybe not. His
playoff performances are his only real claim to fame but this year with a 
hurtin' Emitt he starts the game spotting the niners 14 with 2 interceptions.
Not exactly numbers to be proud of for a supposed great one.

I'd love to see what a guy like Humphries, Bledsoe, Mirer or even Erickson
would do with the weapons at his disposal that the Boytoy has........

mike

9.3521ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysThu Feb 02 1995 15:356
   > dam straight the boytoy stuff is a ::sports delusion fueled by cowboy
   > hatred.thanks for noticing............
    
    Yeah, there's Glen sounding like that's a bad thing.
    
    brews
9.3522I choose to see sunny, warm and pleasant...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Feb 02 1995 15:549
                                                          
>            Glen what color is the sky in "your" real world?
    
    Honolulu Blue which is also the color of the sky at that place where
    those big know-nothing dummies from the NFL are sending Troy yet _again_.
    
    
    glenn
    
9.3523MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Thu Feb 02 1995 16:2011
>    THe 11 consecutive Superbowl victories (with an *average* margin of
>    victory greater than 20 points) AND a history of interconference
>    W-L winning.

	Since the SB games are but ONE game per season between TWO teams
	you're gonna hafta come up with some factoids to back up the 
	"history of interconference W-L winning" afore yer gonna
	convince me.


	billl
9.3524ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysThu Feb 02 1995 16:377
    
    I was talking about the NFC vs. AFC record in that time period. 
    Someone mentioned a 53-47 margin since '70, and it would have to be
    better than that (since I'd agreed that the AFC was stronger in the
    70's) from '84 on.
    
    brews
9.3525MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Thu Feb 02 1995 16:5616
>>a 53-47 margin

	I guess that pretty much sums up my point regarding the "overwelming"
	superiority of one conference over the other.  It just isn't there.

	I'll root for my team and you root for yours, but don't try and
	force feed me that balonie about how the conference your team is
	in is 'far' superior to the one mine is in.  It doesn't wash.

	I prefer to think that it's like the pendulum theory where there
	are extremes to both ends but when all is said and done we find 
	ourselves pretty close to some middle ground.



	billl
9.3526USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 02 1995 17:458
>	I prefer to think that it's like the pendulum theory where there
>	are extremes to both ends but when all is said and done we find
>	ourselves pretty close to some middle ground.

Which is why a seeding system appeals to me.  No matter where the pendulum
is at one point in time, we have a greater chance of getting the top 2
teams in the entire NFL into the SB if we throw out conference affiliation
and seed according to strength based on regular season results.
9.3527CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Thu Feb 02 1995 18:115
re: Troy 

Aikman is a latter day Bart Starr.  A very good quarterback
with a great team.  He has a lot ok skills, and doesn't 
make a lot of mistakes.
9.3528HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Feb 02 1995 18:1518
  Seeding is a bad idea. At 1st I liked the idea but as someone said if the
best two teams end up in the AFC or NFC championship or even earlier then
that's the breaks. 

  The one thing that makes sports better than Hollywood is that you do not
always have a dramatic ending. Some times you do but sometimes you don't and
that makes the truly great games all that much better when they happen. 

  Things like the '12, '62 , or '75 World Series were great partly because they
were not planned. It just worked out that great teams ended up in the
championship and had a head to head contest going down to the wire. 

  If Super Sunday needs a boost because football only gives us one game in it's
championship then add a College superbowl. Rearrange the bowls as a tournament
so that they mean something then have the college teams go as the early game
and the pros as the late game on Super Sunday.

  George
9.3529SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Thu Feb 02 1995 18:3312
    
    	I don't see a reason for seeding the teams. In all other sports the
    seeding is still based on conference not the entire league. With
    schedules weighted towards a division/conference/league schedule.
    	If they seeded the teams, then they would have to change the
    scheduling. They would have to get rid of the 8 games in a division.
    Since teams in a weak division would make it to the playoffs easier.
    Which could potentially lead to the Patriots not playing Miami during
    the season, Or Cleveland not playing Pittsburgh. It will never happen
    because the NFL is all about rivalry's.
    
    Ron
9.3530EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Feb 02 1995 18:3412
> Seeding is a bad idea. At 1st I liked the idea but as someone said if the
> best two teams end up in the AFC or NFC championship or even earlier then
> that's the breaks. 
    
    I'm very much against it too.  I can see the NFL breaking down these
    latest down TV ratings, though, and going ahead with it in some form.
    I think it would leave a contrived feel to the playoffs and if it
    happens it'll be a total sellout...
    
    glenn
    
9.3531Ware to JagsODIXIE::ZOGRANTestudo is still grounded!Thu Feb 02 1995 18:344
    Just heard on the radio that Andre Ware has come to an agreement with
    the Jacksonville Jaguars.  No further details.
    
    UMDan
9.3532Wonder if he'll startCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Thu Feb 02 1995 18:564
|   Just heard on the radio that Andre Ware has come to an agreement with
|   the Jacksonville Jaguars.  No further details.
 
Parade in January, 1996.
9.3533Elway in the HOF???DNEAST::MARDEN_ROBERRangers, Broncos, Red SoxFri Feb 03 1995 02:5316
    Reply .3513
    
    What about Elway?  If anyone he deserves to be on that list.
    
    My top 5....
    1: Young
    2: Marino
    3: Elway
    4: Montana (3 years ago he would have been #1)
    5: Aikman
    
    After that......maybe throw Moon in there and Bledsoe is rising fast.
    
    JMHO
    Rob M.
    
9.3534PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingFri Feb 03 1995 11:443
    Jim Kelly would certainly be in the top 5-6.  Elway would not.
    
    Mark.
9.3535WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Fri Feb 03 1995 11:5612
    
    
    
        Mine would be.
    
    1 Young
      Marino
      Montana
      Kelly
      Smelway
    
    Moon Aikman and bledsoe in my bottom 5
9.3536wheres berniceSTRATA::GARRYFri Feb 03 1995 12:027
    What.......no one rates Kosar or Testaverde up there...I guess its
    just a matter of time before we all know who writes in with his
    usual trash........the same one that thought Swindell was better than
    Clemens even though its 3 Cy Youngs to ZERO
    
    
    Tom
9.3537CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Fri Feb 03 1995 12:2216
Glenn,

I wasn't saying "Well, it's been a great season"....  The previous four
years had conditioned me to expect the Giants to pull something out of the
hat in the closing seconds, as the previous twenty before that had conditioned
me to expect the Giants to always blow a late game lead.

They did force a turnover.  In football, I don't believe that's luck, really.
If it was luck, it's my contention that teams would all be about equal
in that department.

The bottom line is that when the game was over, the Giants had more points
than the Niners.


'Saw
9.3538ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Feb 03 1995 12:293
9.3539max_bench + iq < weightROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Feb 03 1995 12:336
9.3540EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Feb 03 1995 12:5029
> The bottom line is that when the game was over, the Giants had more points
> than the Niners.
    
    Hey, I wasn't knocking the Giants.  They actually did outplay the 49ers 
    in that game, overall (the 5 FGs alone suggests that they moved the
    ball but were just unable to put it away).  I was just going back to 
    the original point and stating that in no way was that team "dominant",
    and in fact they needed a few breaks to win it all (which happens
    fairly often, in any sport).  1990 was the exception, one of only two 
    years over the past 11 where the AFC needed to make no apologies 
    (Buffalo did go into the Super Bowl favored and in the way they played 
    they did not bring shame on themselves).
    
    As a fan based on past experience you may have sincerely believed the
    Giants absolutely were going to pull that game out and eventually the
    championship, but in that past experience obviously they didn't always 
    do so.  I even recall the Giants being eliminated from the playoffs on 
    their home field by the Rams.  The outcome was by no means never in 
    doubt as _has_ been the case on several occasions over the past 11 
    years with some truly dominant teams. 
    
    Back to the problem, though, unlike the situation in 1990, in the 
    present it does still look as if San Fran and Dallas are superior to 
    anyone in the AFC and it might be a couple more years before that'll 
    change.
    
    glenn
    
9.3541CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Fri Feb 03 1995 13:0237
>    Hey, I wasn't knocking the Giants.  

Well, I figured you owed me a few for all of my Cal comments 8^)


>    the original point and stating that in no way was that team "dominant",
>    and in fact they needed a few breaks to win it all (which happens
>    fairly often, in any sport).  1990 was the exception, one of only two 
>    years over the past 11 where the AFC needed to make no apologies 

I think that the Giants were dominant, but that they peaked early.  They
were undefeated through the first ten, then lost something in the next
four.  In the playoffs, the were good, but not dominant like in the
early games.  Plus, Simms went down with an injury too.  So, to me, it
really depends on what part of the season you look at.


    
>    As a fan based on past experience you may have sincerely believed the
>    Giants absolutely were going to pull that game out and eventually the
>    championship, but in that past experience obviously they didn't always 
>    do so.  I even recall the Giants being eliminated from the playoffs on 
>    their home field by the Rams.  The outcome was by no means never in 
>    doubt as _has_ been the case on several occasions over the past 11 
>    years with some truly dominant teams. 

No doubt.  I remember 1989 well, the Flipper Anderson catch for the TD
in OT, which followed the bogus (well, we Giants fans believe it was
bogus) pass interferance call.   That was truly a bad time.

But, I guess what I was trying to point out was the up until 1986, 
Giants fans routinely figured we'd lose the close games -- we always had
it seemed.  BUT, after 1986, our faith was strengthened...

    
'Saw    

9.3542USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Feb 03 1995 14:269
>    Back to the problem, though, unlike the situation in 1990, in the 
>    present it does still look as if San Fran and Dallas are superior to 
>    anyone in the AFC and it might be a couple more years before that'll 
>    change.

If Deion and Watters don't re-sign, there could be trouble in SF next
year.  Sanders makes EVERYONE on that defense better.  Watters emerged
as a big offensive threat, as he was among NFL leaders in total offensive
yards.
9.3543STRATA::GARRYFri Feb 03 1995 16:245
    re 9.3539
    I doubt your mom told you anything loser...after all the doctor slapped
    her pretty good,when he got a look at you.
    
    
9.3544ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Feb 03 1995 16:555
9.3545WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MJAN,279,270,267,264.230 OR BUSTFri Feb 03 1995 16:575
    
    
    
    
       So are you two friends?
9.3546I have the scorebook to prove itROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Feb 03 1995 17:085
9.3547groaner wwrong againSTRATA::GARRYFri Feb 03 1995 17:206
    Wrong again Mrs Mouth I never played in any DEC softball league........
    get a life ...you must be a real beauty if keep sh*t like that..a
    scorebook from 6-10 years ago......how old are you anyway 30 going
    onto teenage years,.............
    
    
9.3548ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Feb 03 1995 17:304
9.3549GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Fri Feb 03 1995 17:334
    
    	Take it to 7THGRADE::SPORTS!
    
    Claybone
9.3550ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Fri Feb 03 1995 17:363
9.3551MSE1::FRANCUSLast day as a free man 7/8Sun Feb 05 1995 03:534
    Nah more like the pre-natal stage. Wait a minute I thought
    ObnoxiousDawgs couldn't read or write!
    
    The Crazy Met
9.3552CSOA1::JACOBSun Feb 05 1995 11:1814
    
    
    >>								Mom told
    >>me not to pick on people smaller than me when I was young.  I'm sure 
    >>she meant mentally.                                         
    
    Groaner,
    being yer a Clevescumite, I cain't believe you'd publicly make the
    above statement, seeing it only allows you to pick on peoples with IQ's
    LOWER than their shoe size, or, to be exact, the average Cincinnati
    Bengals fan.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3553NOT!!!MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Mon Feb 06 1995 12:526
	Wow!  That overpowering, much more talented, NFC team sure
	looked good in Honolulu.



	billl
9.3554ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Mon Feb 06 1995 13:093
9.3555PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Feb 06 1995 15:014
    Groaner, *I* could have racked up 180 yards against that defense
    yesterday.
    
    Mark.
9.3556Do the mathMSBCS::BRYDIEMike Lupica - Literary Giant!Mon Feb 06 1995 15:062
    
      Tha AFC racked up 400 yards on 40 carries.
9.3557Another one bites the dustCSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Mon Feb 06 1995 15:114
It's truly a bad year for O.J.  Not only is he up to his ears in legal
battles, but his pro-bowl rushing record was smashed twice yesterday.

Jerry
9.3558DZIGN::ROBICHAUDHappy 100th BambinoMon Feb 06 1995 15:166
    	The NFL Pro Bowl is like the NHL Some Star Game, an exhibition,
    at best where hitting is kept to a minimum.  If the AFC backers
    want to use this pathetic display to claim conference superiority,
    they can, but it still will not win the conference a Super Bowl.
    
    				   /Don
9.3559Sanders Ain't Going AnywhereSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Feb 06 1995 16:064
      I heard something to the effect that Nike's (I think its Nike)
      offer to Deion Sanders is like 2 mil more if he stays in San Fran.
      Its a bummer, but San Fran has the luxury of people receiving 
      extra money outside of the team's own expense/the cap.
9.3560MSE1::FRANCUSLast day as a free man 7/8Mon Feb 06 1995 16:255
    Sega's offer to Sanders increases by a LOT if he stays in SF. I wonder
    if the NFL will find that to be an unfari competitive advantage.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
9.3561CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPottie training is hell!!!Mon Feb 06 1995 16:418
|   Sega's offer to Sanders increases by a LOT if he stays in SF. I wonder
|   if the NFL will find that to be an unfari competitive advantage.
 
Yea, it's Sega.  Dion gets $2.5 mil if he stays with SF,
but only $1.5 mil if he plays elsewhere.  Guess it must
be cheaper than a software upgrade project.

=Bob=
9.3562Speaking of wierd, how's OJ, Tanya and Mike these daysAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeMon Feb 06 1995 16:519
    I think the contract with NIke that Jordan had was worse since Nike put
    a lot of $bucks into NBA as advertiser.  This is awfully close to a
    conflict of interest.
    
    As some of you know my mind works a little differently but after seeing
    my pick of Orlando as '94 champ go down in round 1 I decided the reason 
    for that was that Shaq wasn't wearing Nikes (Reebok?).
    
    Okay, far-fetched?  Yes, but isn't this a far-fetched world.
9.3563ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysTue Feb 07 1995 15:0317
    
    
 >   <<< Note 9.3525 by MKFSA::LONG "Close, but no cigar!" >>>
    
 >   >>a 53-47 margin        
    
 >   I guess that pretty much sums up my point regarding the "overwelming"
 >   superiority of one conference over the other.  It just isn't there.
    
    
    Boy, guys gone for a few days and people start taking his notes
    completely out of context.  C'mon Bill, look at hte whole note.  that
    53-47 margin is since 1970, we've been talking in here since '84. 
    Everyone has pretty much agreed that the AFC owned the 70's so the
    margin has to be bigger since '84.
    
    brews
9.3564METSNY::francusLast day as a free man 7/8Tue Feb 07 1995 15:405
The NYT or Globe had the stats of NFC vs. AFC for the last 11 years,
It was something like 18?? - 17?? in favor of the NFC. Again not an
overwhelming margin.

The Crazy Met
9.3565CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Tue Feb 07 1995 17:4011
While, I'm probably stating the obvious {pause here for everyone to yell
at me about that}, but the crux of the matter isn't so much that one conference
has more talent than the other, or is overwhelmingly better, it's just that
the way the talent is pooled into teams has favored one conference for a while.

It just so happens that the two best collections of talent in the NFL right
now happen to reside in Dallas and San Francisco, as opposed to Buffalo
and San Diego....


'Saw
9.3566From my archives - straight winners by confAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeTue Feb 07 1995 20:2523
                                                                  NFC     AFC


Total for Year:                        88                           21      27
	(missing weeks 1,2)

Total for Year:                        89                           22      24
	Missiing weeks 1,2)

Total for Year:                        90                           26      26

	Missing week 1
Total for Year:                        91                           33      19

	Missing week 1
Total for Year:                        92                           31      21

	Missing week 1
Total for Year:                        94                           21      18

	Missing 1-5
Total for 88-95:                                                   154     135

9.356788-95 by the spread (via my 1/2 to home team)AKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeTue Feb 07 1995 20:2724
                                                                  NFC     AFC


Total for Year:                        88                           25      23


Total for Year:                        89                           25      21


Total for Year:                        90                           19      33


Total for Year:                        91                           31      21


Total for Year:                        92                           26      26


Total for Year:                        94                           24      15


Total for 88-95:                                                   150     139


9.3568CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 08 1995 11:417
Billte,

If'n I cain remember to do it, I can get figures for you for the missing
weeks.  I've got a football encyclopedia that would have them.....


'Saw
9.3569Is your source on-line?AKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeWed Feb 08 1995 13:137
    '93 should be right in here.  The first few weeks for '88-92 would fill
    it out.  Of course the lines used by me or anybody else don't
    necessarily represent what you can actually lay on the phone or
    otherwise.
    
    The wagering scene I'm most interested in the Ontario Lottery.  I'd
    love to here comments on people who play that.
9.3570CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 08 1995 14:244
No, it's not on-line.  It's hard copy, through '92 I think, of all the
scores and stats.

Wish it was on-line....8^)
9.3571Beuerlein goes firstedHBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 15:176
The firsted round is complete.

Jacksonville took Steve Beuerlein, QB Arizona
Charlotte took Rod Smith, DB, New England

TTom
9.3572firsted three roundsHBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 15:3311
Expansion Draft.

1. Jacksonville - Steve Beuerlein, QB, Arizona
   Charlotte - Rod Smith, DB, New England

2. Jacksonville - Corey Raymond, DB, Giants
   Charlotte - Harry Boatswain, OT, San Francisco

3. Jacksonville - Jeff Novak, G, Miami
   Charlotte - Kurt Haws, TE, Washington

9.3573Rounds 4 and 5HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 15:568
Expansion Draft:

4. Jacksonville - John Duff, TE, Raiders
   Charlotte - Tyrone Rodgers, DE, Seattle

5. Jacksonville - Keith Goganious, LB, Buffalo
   Charlotte - Mark Thomas, DE, San Francisco

9.3574Rounds 6 and 7HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 16:208
Expansion Draft:

6. Jacksonville - Mark Williams, LB, Green Bay
   Charlotte - Tim McKyer, DB, Pittsburgh

7. Jacksonville - Al Jackson, DB, Philadelphia
   Charlotte - Curtis Whitley, C, San Diego

9.3575CAMONE::WAYTime to align the data!Wed Feb 15 1995 16:268
Are they releasing the names that the other teams are pulling from their
eligibility lists as the players are chosen?

Raymond was chosen from the Giants.  Whose name did they remove?  Anyone
know?


'Saw
9.3576someHBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 16:339
They aren't doing a very good job of the pull backs.

After a pick, they're giving the team who loses the player 2 minutes to
pull back.

I've heard a couple. Ricky Proehl, after Beuerlein. Stan White was pulled
by the Giants after Raymond. Mike Gisler has been pulled. 

TTom
9.3577CAMONE::WAYTime to align the data!Wed Feb 15 1995 16:387
>I've heard a couple. Ricky Proehl, after Beuerlein. Stan White was pulled
>by the Giants after Raymond. Mike Gisler has been pulled. 
>
>TTom

Thanks TTom.....

9.3578Rounds 8 and 9HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 16:408
Expansion Draft:

8. Jacksonville - Mark Tucker, C, Arizona
   Charlotte - Howard Griffith, RB, Rams

9. Jacksonville - Paul Frase, DE, Jets
   Charlotte - Greg  Kragen, DT, Kansas City

9.3579MKFSA::LONGThe Igloo is rockin'!Wed Feb 15 1995 16:537
>>   Charlotte - Tim McKyer, DB, Pittsburgh

	Can I get an AMEN??!!!!



	billl
9.3580Full Name ProvidedUSCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 15 1995 16:584
>2. Jacksonville - Corey Raymond, DB, Giants
>   Charlotte - Harry Boatswain, OT, San Francisco

Harry 'Turnstile' Boatswain
9.3581Rounds 10 and 11HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 17:049
Expansion Draft:

10. Jacksonville - Tom Myslinski, G, Chicago
    Charlotte - Cary Brabham, DB, Raiders

11. Jacksonville - Willie Jackson, WR, Dallas
    Charlotte - Dave Garnett, LB, Minnesota

Couple of pullbacks: Tryone Montgomery, Raiders; Jason Garrett, Dallas
9.3582Rounds 12 and 13HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 17:248
Expansion Draft:

12. Jacksonville - Othello Henderson, DB, New Orleans
    Charlotte - Andre Powell, LB, Giants

13. Jacksonville - Santo Stephens, LB, Cincinnati
    Charlotte - Dewell Brewer, RB, Indianapolis

9.3583Rounds 14 and 15HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 17:437
Expansion Draft:

14. Jacksonville - Darren Carrington, DB, San Deigo
    Charlotte - Bob Christian, RB, Chicago

15. Jacksonville - Michael Davis, DB, Houston
    Charlotte - Fred Foggie, DB, Pittsburgh
9.3584Rounds 16-18HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 18:0911
Expansion Draft:

16. Jacksonville - Dave Thomas, DB, Dallas
    Charlotte - Mark Carrier, WR, Cleveland

17. Jacksonville - Mazio Royster, RB, Tampa Bay
    Charlotte - Mark Rodenhauser, C, Detroit

18. Jacksonville - Le'Shai Maston, RB, Houston
    Charlotte - Steve Hawkins, WR, New England

9.3585Rounds 19 and 20HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 18:258
Expansion Draft:

19. Jacksonville - Charles Davenport, WR, Pittsburgh
    Charlotte - Brian O'Neal, RB, Philadelphia

20. Jacksonville - Monty Grow, DB, Kansas City
    Charlotte - Derrick Lassic, RB, Dallas

9.3586METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Feb 15 1995 18:395
billl,

who do you think you are Reverend Billy Sol Harkness??

The Crazy Met
9.3587USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 15 1995 18:401
How many DBs has Jacksonville drafted ???
9.3588da rosters so far...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Wed Feb 15 1995 18:4222
	Jacksonville			    Charlotte

1.  Steve Beuerlein, QB, Arizona	Rod Smith, DB, New England
2.  Corey Raymond, DB, Giants		Harry Boatswain, OT, San Francisco
3.  Jeff Novak, G, Miami		Kurt Haws, TE, Washington
4.  John Duff, TE, Raiders		Tyrone Rodgers, DE, Seattle
5.  Keith Goganious, LB, Buffalo	Mark Thomas, DE, San Francisco
6.  Mark Williams, LB, Green Bay	Tim McKyer, DB, Pittsburgh
7.  Al Jackson, DB, Philadelphia	Curtis Whitley, C, San Diego
8.  Mark Tucker, C, Arizona		Howard Griffith, RB, Rams
9.  Paul Frase, DE, Jets		Greg  Kragen, DT, Kansas City
10. Tom Myslinski, G, Chicago		Cary Brabham, DB, Raiders
11. Willie Jackson, WR, Dallas		Dave Garnett, LB, Minnesota
12. Othello Henderson, DB, New Orleans	Andre Powell, LB, Giants
13. Santo Stephens, LB, Cincinnati	Dewell Brewer, RB, Indianapolis
14. Darren Carrington, DB, San Deigo	Bob Christian, RB, Chicago
15. Michael Davis, DB, Houston		Fred Foggie, DB, Pittsburgh
16. Dave Thomas, DB, Dallas		Mark Carrier, WR, Cleveland
17. Mazio Royster, RB, Tampa Bay	Mark Rodenhauser, C, Detroit
18. Le'Shai Maston, RB, Houston		Steve Hawkins, WR, New England
19. Charles Davenport, WR, Pittsburgh	Brian O'Neal, RB, Philadelphia
20. Monty Grow, DB, Kansas City		Derrick Lassic, RB, Dallas
9.3589Rounds 21 and 22HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 18:468
Expansion Draft:

21. Jacksonville - Marcus Wilson, RB, Green Bay
    Charlotte - Richard Buchanan, WR, LA Rams

22. Jacksonville - Brant Boyer, LB, Miami
    Charlotte - Doug Pederson, QB, Miami

9.3590Rounds 23 and 24HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 19:068
Expansion Draft:

23. Jacksonville - Harry Colon, DB, Detroit
    Charlotte - Vince Marrow, TE, Buffalo

24. Jacksonville - Derek Brown, TE, NY Giants
    Charlotte - Larry Ryans, WR, Detroit

9.3591Rounds 25 and 26HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 19:208
Expansion Draft:

25. Jacksonville - James Williams, LB, New Olreans
    Charlotte - Baron Rollins, G, New Orleans

26. Jacksonville - Eugene Chung, G, New England
    Charlotte - William Sims, LB, Minnesota

9.3592CAMONE::WAYTime to align the data!Wed Feb 15 1995 19:258
>24. Jacksonville - Derek Brown, TE, NY Giants



The Giants dump the loser!  The Giants dump the loser!  The Giants dump
the loser!  The Giants dump the loser!


9.3593CNTROL::CHILDSIf nothing's right, What's wrong?Wed Feb 15 1995 19:292
 still got Reeves though...........
9.3594rounds 27 and 28HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 19:348
Expansion Draft:

27. Jacksonville - Reggie Cobb, RB, Green Bay
    Charlotte - Paul Butcher, LB, Indianapolis

28. Jacksonville - Desmond Howard, WR, Washington
    Charlotte - Jack Trudeau, QB, NY Jets

9.3595CAMONE::WAYTime to align the data!Wed Feb 15 1995 19:3813
>    <<< Note 9.3593 by CNTROL::CHILDS "If nothing's right, What's wrong?" >>>
>
>
> still got Reeves though...........


Thanks Mike.  Thanks a lot. 

I was going to go home, have a nice meal, pack a few boxes, make a few
more moving arrangments, and enjoy the fact that we got rid of Brown.

You had to spoil it for me, didn't you!  8^)

9.3596Rounds 29 and 30HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 19:467
Expansion Draft:

29. Jacksonville - Kelvin Martin, WR, Seattle
    Charlotte - Charles Swann, WR, Denver

30. Jacksonville - Cedric Tillan, WR, Denver
    Charlotte - David Mims, WR, Atlanta
9.3597BSS::MENDEZWed Feb 15 1995 20:103
    How many rounds are there in the expansion draft???
    
    
9.3598Rounds 31-35 (lasted)HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 15 1995 20:1016
Expansion Draft:

31. Jacksonville - Rogerick Green, DB, Tampa Bay
    Charlotte - Shawn Price, DE, Tampa Bay

32. Jacksonville - pass
    Charlotte - Eric Guilford, WR, Minnesota

33. Jacksonville - pass
    Charlotte - Bill Goldberg, DT, Atlanta

34. Jacksonville - pass
    Charlotte - Eric Ball, RB, Cincinnati

35. Jacksonville - pass
    Charlotte - Mike Teeter, DT, Houston
9.3599Good riddance, Desmond!ODIXIE::ZOGRANTestudo is still grounded!Wed Feb 15 1995 20:407
    So Jacksonville gets ol' Desmond Howard from the 'Skins.  I think he
    was in the last (or next to last) year of his contract.  Wonder how
    much he is gonna cost Jax?  What a bust.  And to think they gave up
    another 1st round pick to get him (I think they bundled two first round
    pick together to move up in that years draft).
    
    UMDan 
9.3600SNARFOUTSRC::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Feb 15 1995 20:421
9.3601many $sHBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceThu Feb 16 1995 12:378
Ol' Desmond Tutu Moe Howard will cost the Jaguars $1.77 mil.

All in all, the Jaguars committed themselves to spend $15+ mil. 

The Panthers are on the hook for only $9+ mil. The local talk is that the
Panthers will get into the free agent market in a big way.

TTom
9.3602CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Thu Feb 16 1995 12:446
So how does this RFA thang work?  If the teams drafted RFAs, are the RFAs still
free to negotiate with other teams, with the expansions teams free to match?  Is
this just a ploy to keep payrolls down (ie the expansion teams will let many of
the RFAs go to other clubs, so they can concentrate on other FAs)?

=Bob=
9.3603woops! TTom answered me in 142.180CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Thu Feb 16 1995 12:450
9.3604maybeHBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceThu Feb 16 1995 12:467
You got the mechanics correct.

Don't know about the intentions. Locally, the Panthers are dismissing
this idea, that they just took some players and hope some go to other
clubs. Of course, that may just be a public posture.

TTom
9.3605Rison goneHBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceFri Feb 17 1995 20:244
I think I just heard that Andre Rison was cut, waived or otherwise
disowned by the Falcons.

TTom
9.3606WHY?! MKOTS3::TCC051::CORRIGANTue Apr 04 1995 14:104


	what's the "Y" in Y.A. Tittle or Tittel or Tiddle or Tiddel?!?!
9.3607yo mammy?HBAHBA::HAASrecurring recusancyTue Apr 04 1995 14:140
9.3608Yelverton (Abraham?) TittleAKOCOA::BREENTue Apr 04 1995 14:181
    
9.3609CAMONE::WAYUSS Pickerel SS-177, On Eternal PatrolTue Apr 04 1995 16:318
>                        -< Yelverton (Abraham?) Tittle >-

Close.

It's Yelberton Abraham Tittle......

    

9.3610no wonder he went by Y.A.!!!!!MKOTS3::TCC051::CORRIGANTue Apr 04 1995 16:434


	thanx
9.3611ODIXIE::ZOGRANIt's the Champale talking!Tue Apr 04 1995 18:044
    Packers traded Terrell Buckley to the Fins for past considerations. 
    What the **** are "past considerations"?
    
    UMDan
9.3612AGNT99::CHILDSEnd Corporate Welfare Instead!Tue Apr 04 1995 18:169
>    Packers traded Terrell Buckley to the Fins for past considerations. 
>    What the **** are "past considerations"?
    
 
 Keith Jackson? Lewis Oliver? Didn't the Packers give up a spot in the draft
 to the Dolphins so they could get Oliver??????? Mark Ingram? 

 mike
9.3613:^)USCTR1::GARBARINObumhiem, lappas...idiotsTue Apr 04 1995 18:205
> Keith Jackson? Lewis Oliver? Didn't the Packers give up a spot in the draft
> to the Dolphins so they could get Oliver??????? Mark Ingram? 

Jackson and Ingram.  Oliver is with Cincinnati now.  Maybe Jackson is
SO overweight that the Pack MADE Miami take Buckley to even things up.
9.3614not exactly sad to see him goPOBOX::WIERSBECKTue Apr 04 1995 20:175
    Packers move = addition by subtraction.  Buckley being gone has caused
    hysteria in cheeseland!  ;*)
    
    
    Spud
9.3615should have stayed home...results would have been the sameUSCTR1::GARBARINObumhiem, lappas...idiotsWed Apr 05 1995 15:387
>    Packers move = addition by subtraction.  Buckley being gone has caused
>    hysteria in cheeseland!  ;*)

That truly was a BAD day for Wolf (Packers GM).  If you remember, they
wanted Desmond Howard, and their attempts to move up to get him failed.
Washington moved ahead of GB and snagged him.  So the Pack ends up
taking Buckley.
9.3616Buckley and VincentSTRATA::BARBIERIWed Apr 05 1995 20:4412
      The Pack also drafted before Miami that year.  The top rated
      corners were Troy Vincent out of Wisconsin and Terrel Buckley
      out of Florida State.  So the Wisconsin team takes the Floridian
      and the Dolphins settle for the guy from Wisconsin.
    
      The Pack said they chose Buckley because of his other abilities
      (special teams).  Buckley proceeded to fumble so many punts that
      he asked to be relieved of those duties.  And as for pass coverage...
      well, he wasn't working out.
    
      The Pack has been abysmal so far as drafting defensive corners is
      concerned.
9.3617USCTR1::GARBARINObumhiem, lappas...idiotsWed Apr 05 1995 20:545
>      The Pack has been abysmal so far as drafting defensive corners is
>      concerned.

So true.  They should never DRAFT one again.  Instead, they should just
buy a proven veteran when they need one.
9.3618St. Louis RamsBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Apr 12 1995 22:025

	Looks like the Rams are moving after all.  Owners approved it today.

	Kevin
9.3619The St Louis Rams (Rams have sucked since Dickerson left)MR1PST::THEKGB::MBROOKSThu Apr 13 1995 12:003
    I Didnt see or hear anything on this  ???? It wouldnt happen until when
    ?????
    								mab
9.3620Pretty sure it's for this seasonODIXIE::ZOGRANIt's the Champale talking!Thu Apr 13 1995 12:5812
    Rams move happens in time for the upcoming season (pretty sure).  This
    leaves only one team in the NFC West that is West of the Mississippi -
    SF ( I know, St. Louis is a little west of the Mississippi, but why
    quibble with a couple of miles.  And that could change if they get
    another big flood!).
    
    Looks like the Owners would rather switch than fight this one out in
    court.
    
    Al Davis has gotta love this!
    
    UMDan
9.3621DELNI::FORGETThu Apr 13 1995 14:349
    
    
    
    
    
    
       yesterday on ESPN, they said the Rams are moving, then  Showed the
    Commish says that a NFC team in Los Angeles is a priority.  Second
    largest market in the U.S.
9.3622L.A. CardinalsOUTSRC::HEISERnext year in Jerusalem!Thu Apr 13 1995 15:461
9.3623exMKOTS3::LONGLife is better left to chance.Wed May 24 1995 22:5811
    got the following off the net this evening...
    
    "The Cleveland Browns and Cincinnati Bengals were mentioned as 
    possible teams to move to Los Angeles, which was left with only 
    one team with the departure of the Rams."
    
    I'm suprised neither Groaner nor Hal (who?) have mentioned this.
    
    
    billl
    
9.3624MKOTS3::LONGLife is better left to chance.Wed May 24 1995 23:219
    Also from this article (from starwave) was mention of the owners
    considering increasing the number of playoff teams from 12 to 16.
    Having teams bid to sponsor the divisional championship, ala
    Stupid Bowl, is being discussed, too.
    
    Both suck, IMHO
    
    
    billl
9.3625MKOTS3::LONGLife is better left to chance.Wed May 24 1995 23:2417
    The more I read of this the better it gets...
    
    "The owners established a fund to help the league's less profitable
    teams.
    
    Tagliabue said 15 teams are under the league average. Under the plan, a
    pool will be established so that teams suffering financial woes can 
    apply for money from a league committee.
    
    The pool will be established from the $20 million the Rams are paying
    to move to St. Louis and from permanent seat licenses sold in 
    Jacksonville, St. Louis and Carolina."
    
    I guess they owe a special thanks to TTom and his friends.
    
    
    billl
9.3626good riddanceOUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Thu May 25 1995 15:311
9.3627SALEM::DODAChairman of the BoredThu May 25 1995 15:5011
      <<< Note 9.3623 by MKOTS3::LONG "Life is better left to chance." >>>
                                    -< ex >-

   
  >  "The Cleveland Browns and Cincinnati Bengals were mentioned as 
  >  possible teams to move to Los Angeles, which was left with only 
  >  one team with the departure of the Rams."
   
   How long before the protests start? In LA, I mean....

   daryll
9.3628OLD1S::CADZILLA2Fifty lashes with a wet squirrelThu May 25 1995 15:553
    
    Moving the Browns to LA would be appropriate since the sky is always
    brown the name would have real meaning. 
9.3629I can't believe I'm defending ClevescumPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFThu May 25 1995 16:4817
  Ever since I wus rockin in a cradle, I have proudly worn the colors of 
  Black n Gold. So ya all know I'm no Clevescum fan. But I think it
  would be a huge injustice to move the 'Spots to LA. All of dem mutant
  people who look like they're wearing masks(but really aren't) have 
  supported the 'Spots with enthusiasm not seen in most major league cities.
  In LA, ya got the empty seats in the Coliseum and the people who do
  come seem more interested in catchin a sun tan or takin a nap. Contrast
  the atmosphere of the Coliseum with that in the Dawg pound of Clevescum
  Municicesspool stadium and you'll know where the hearts and minds are. 

  I wus once kidnapped at gunpoint and forced to spend some time in the 
  Mistake by the Lake. While there, I learned that the people of Clevescum 
  follow the Browns with a passion. Northwestern Ohio is real football
  country, 2nd only to Western Pa.

	Keith
9.3630PTOSS1::JACOBRCertified LooneyThu May 25 1995 17:045
    Keith, they follow the Browns cause "Browns" is the only six-letter
    word they cain spell.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3631PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFThu May 25 1995 17:175
  Jake, I dint know they could spell any 6 letter words. I thought
  they were named Browns cuz that's the only color they know in
  Clevescum.

	Keith
9.3632PTOSS1::JACOBRCertified LooneyThu May 25 1995 17:206
    Nah, they're named Browns cause they look like sh_t, smell like sh_t,
    and play like sh_t, and as aforementioned, it's the biggest word the
    mutants of the area cain spell.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3633Bengals to LA if you ask me...SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Thu May 25 1995 17:3710
    
    	I'd say the Bengals will be moving to LA. A lien was just put
    on the Bengals for ~34 million by the IRS. The Bengals family (Brown)
    is in the same predicament that the Robbie family was, down in Miami.
    Dad dies and the IRS wants the inheritence money. The only way the
    family can pay the IRS. Is to sell the team to get the money. So look
    for Tagliabue to help the Brown family sell the Bengals to an LA
    investor.
    
    Ron
9.3634Keep the Browns in Cleveland (Please).MR1PST::THEKGB::MBROOKSThu May 25 1995 17:529
    I have to agree with a noter back a few, moving the browns is stupid
    to even consider.  They have HUGE fan support (WHY I DONT UNDERSTAND).
    And HISTORY, I figure they'll just keep expanding until every city
    has a least 1 team, then a 20 game season and develope a HOCKEY type
    Playoff system so over 70% of the teams make the playoffs,  now if
    they could just have a bunch of 7 games playoff series too make the
    regular season POINTLESS they could be more like Hockey.
    
    								MaB
9.3635OUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Thu May 25 1995 17:571
9.3636Any News?KIRKTN::HBOGIETue Jun 13 1995 08:2612
    
        So what is happening with the Browns?
    
    	They may not be the best team in the NFL, but their fans are the
    most loyal in the league.  I know, as I've been in the Dawg pound a few
    times myself.
    
    "Worried" Dawg fan from Scotland!
    
    
    
    	
9.3637ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 13 1995 11:089
9.3638?KIRKTN::HBOGIETue Jun 13 1995 11:469
    
    
    	Where did Foster go to?
    
        Shug.
    
    
    
    
9.3639ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 13 1995 11:547
9.3640PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneTue Jun 13 1995 12:4614
    
    >>had a solid draft.  The Steelers have lost Green, Anderson and
    >>Foster with nothing to show for it.  JaKe *thinks* this is not a
    >>problem, but Pittsburgh didn't exactly score at will last year,
    
    Show me where I said that this is "not a problem".
    
    Anyways, the Brown(spot)s(tm) still have Vinny "Two good games a
    season" Testicleverde, who throws interceptions at the rate which
    McDonalds sells hamburgers, as their starting QB.  With that in mind,
    they surely ain't a lock to win the Central.
    
    JaKe
    
9.3641some losses, but ...HBAHBA::HAASCo-Captor of the Wind DemonTue Jun 13 1995 12:4613
Anderson has peaked and has declining skills.
Foster has a_attitude problem that continues to dog him with the Panthers
- he's had to sit out several mini-camp sessions because of "exhaustion".
Green has a_attitude problem but will be the one most missed.

So you could make the case that the Steelers have lost something in these
players getting gone.

However, it must be acknowledged that the Browns, desptie and signings,
still have Vinnie at the helm, who, no matter how far they go, will
eventually choke. There's no debate that Vinnie'll blow it. Only when.

TTom
9.3642PTOSS1::JACOBRCertifiably InsaneTue Jun 13 1995 12:504
    notes collision
    
    JaKe
    
9.3643great minds; same gutterHBAHBA::HAASCo-Captor of the Wind DemonTue Jun 13 1995 12:530
9.3644SALEM::DODABob Kraft, man of beneficenceTue Jun 13 1995 14:055
That's: 

Vinny "You pick the comeback, I'll throw the interception" Testeverde

daryll
9.3645Browns lucky enough last yearOURGNG::RIGGENNetworks Sales &amp; MarketingTue Jun 13 1995 20:244
    Defensively the Browns lost the NT Michael Dean Perry and some other 
    Linebacker to the Bronco's how did they fix that in the draft ?
    
    Jeff
9.3646ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 13 1995 20:278
9.3647Who's gonna fill the Hole ?OURGNG::RIGGENNetworks Sales &amp; MarketingTue Jun 13 1995 20:293
    He was only jumping off-sides cause of Elway's cadence. 
    
    
9.3648ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 13 1995 20:424
9.3649Big Bad John will returnHBAHBA::HAASimprobable causeFri Jul 14 1995 16:4013
Just when it looked like it'd be a long hot summer with nothin but NASCAR
to save me from MLB, Big Bad John comes along and reminds me that
football is just around the corner.

Seems like we're gonna have ol' Elway around for a few more years. He has
declared himself fit despite a deteriorating knee:

	"I don't think it's in any worse shape than it's been in
	for the last three or four years."

Well, he's aint looked all that great for these said same lasted years.

TTom
9.3650LOCK::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Fri Jul 14 1995 18:546
    
    	"deteriorating knee"?  He doesn't even have an ACL in one of
    	them!  That bulky brace is the only thing holding it together
    	when he plays.  Yup, ole John has lost what speed he had....
    
    Claybone
9.3651USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jul 19 1995 14:337
re:  Elway's knee problem

In Shanahan's offense he won't have to run.  In fact, they could put him
in the shotgun most of the time (ala Marino) and let him use that strong
arm to pick apart defenses with that short passing game.  I think Elway's
arm strength can give him at least a few more good years in the NFL, *IF*
he will convert himself to a pure drop-back, pocket passer.
9.3652Warrant for BladesHBAHBA::HAAStime compressedWed Jul 19 1995 15:1122
and meanwhile,

Brian Blades, Seattle receiver, has been charged with felonious
manslaughter in the death of his cousin, Charles Blades, on July 5.

Originally, Blades and others maintained that the death was accidental
even though 2 gun shots were heard. During the investigation, police
found forensic evidence that the gun was very close to the guys head when
fired.

Now, the police think they have it figgered out. Bennie Blades, Brian's
brother, and Brian were supposedly arguing. The cousin tried to
intervene. Brian went and got his gun and in a struggle with the cousin,
shot him.

The police claim there is no evidence to support the accidental shooting.
They also say there is no evidence of premeditation, hence the charge is
manslaughter, not murder.

Brian is headed back to Florida to answer the charges.

TTom
9.3653USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jul 19 1995 15:4915
>Brian Blades, Seattle receiver, has been charged with felonious
>manslaughter in the death of his cousin, Charles Blades, on July 5.

Couldn't see this one coming, could you ?  Not willing to give a
statement to the police...his agent (aka scum-sucking leach) saying
he was too upset to talk about it....

ESPNET has a very good article on the Blades brothers' backgrounds
and you can easily believe that this guy "lost it" for a brief moment...
that the gun didn't just accidentally fire.


Sports used to be fun.  Paraphrasing an old Stevie Wonder song:

	"sports in need of sports today..."
9.3654Maybe if he already had the gun on his person I could see itEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Jul 19 1995 16:2412
    
> They also say there is no evidence of premeditation, hence the charge is
> manslaughter, not murder.
    
    Pretty lenient, it seems.  Normally isn't premeditation the criterion 
    for 1st-degree murder?  I guess this is one of those Florida things, 
    where with the courts jam-packed, if'n it's part of an ongoing fight 
    you can go grab your gun and ring off a couple of shots, then claim
    it was unintentional...
    
    glenn
    
9.3655Ts & CsHBAHBA::HAAStime compressedWed Jul 19 1995 17:1712
Glenn,

I think it's a Florida definition.

Locally, all killings that are felonies are called some flavor of murder.
Manslaughter is a misdemeanor.

This is a felony manslaughter charge that carries up to 20 or 30 years.
That sounds like what NC calls 2nd degree or non-capital (caint get the
death sentence) murder.

TTom
9.3656ERICF::MAIEWSKIWed Jul 19 1995 20:3617
RE                     <<< Note 9.3654 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>

>    Pretty lenient, it seems.  Normally isn't premeditation the criterion 
>    for 1st-degree murder?  I guess this is one of those Florida things, 

  It varies from state to state. In California, premeditation is the difference
between 1st and 2nd degree murder and manslaughter is a crime of passion.

  In Massachusetts there is no definition, only penalties so they default to
the rules of Common Law. Under Common Law 2nd degree Murder is a crime of
passion or a murder with mitigating circumstances and Manslaughter is a
Homicide committed without malice aforethought. 

  Your mileage may vary in other states but most states consider manslaughter
to be a felony, not a misdemeanor.

  George
9.3657CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westWed Jul 19 1995 22:397
    
    ...and in Colorado there is the "make my day" law.  If someone is
    breaking into my house, I can shoot them dead.  No warning shots,
    nothing.
    
    Marc
    
9.3658COOL!OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jul 20 1995 01:581
9.3659IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Thu Jul 20 1995 12:4513
>    ...and in Colorado there is the "make my day" law.  If someone is
>    breaking into my house, I can shoot them dead.  No warning shots,
>    nothing.

This should be a federal law.  I'm sure there'd be a lot less breaking and
entering.

I'm curious as to how many shots you could fire before you become liable
for something.  If you hit the guy in the shoulder and disarm him, *then*
drill him between the eyes, are you liable for something like 2nd degree
murder?  The exact wording of the law really determines its effectiveness.

Roland
9.3660Ready, Aim, Fire....SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOThu Jul 20 1995 12:5316
>I'm curious as to how many shots you could fire before you become liable
>for something.  If you hit the guy in the shoulder and disarm him, *then*
>drill him between the eyes, are you liable for something like 2nd degree
>murder?  The exact wording of the law really determines its effectiveness.


It's been a while since I lived in CO, but if I recall correctly, as long as 
they was in your house and breathing, you had the ok to shoot 'em.  In fact, the
person didn't even have to be armed to begin with, just as long as they were
in your house.

There was (and I imagine still is) a lot of talk about the fairness of this and 
the possibility of an innocent getting plugged.  All I know is there were a lot
less house break ins that I heard about out there then around here in Mass.

zamboni
9.3661CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianThu Jul 20 1995 12:5730
>
>I'm curious as to how many shots you could fire before you become liable
>for something.  If you hit the guy in the shoulder and disarm him, *then*
>drill him between the eyes, are you liable for something like 2nd degree
>murder?  The exact wording of the law really determines its effectiveness.
>


Course, if it's you and him, just say that you pulled off two quick rounds.
Who's gonna prove which hit him first?  8^)


In CT, the law is a little weirder.  It depends on where you are in the house,
and where the breakin is occuring when it comes to determining the threat
level.

For example, if you're on the second floor, and the break-in is on the first
floor, the law deems that you could, without threat, call the police, lock your
bedroom door and wait.  If you go downstairs to shoot the guy, it's a horse of
a different color.

However, if you're on the first floor and the break-in is there, you can shoot
away.  

A cop told me once if the guy is climbing in a window, you shoot him and he
falls out, he said to bring the body INSIDE before calling the police 8^)


'Saw

9.3662AKOCOA::BREENThu Jul 20 1995 13:563
    
    I think mass was or is one of the worst places to shoot an intruder or
    anyone intent on committing a crime.  Has it gotten any better?
9.3663mileage variesHBAHBA::HAAStime compressedThu Jul 20 1995 14:0014
Once agin, West By Gawd Virginee is ahead of the curve...

There, the prevailing law is that once a person comes onto your fenced-in
property you have the right to shoot firsted and ask questions later.

In NC, the law is very dependent on interpretation and the situation.
Like Saw said, it's a better case if'n the guy ends up in your home when
you shoot a_intruder.

However, the law does not support the right to shoot someone who is
trying to steal your car. In a recent case, this was not considered
grounds for self defense. 

TTom
9.3664IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Thu Jul 20 1995 14:105
>However, the law does not support the right to shoot someone who is
>trying to steal your car. In a recent case, this was not considered
>grounds for self defense. 

Can you shoot someone who scraped your car and didn't leave a note?  :-) :-)
9.3665CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianThu Jul 20 1995 14:1330
>However, the law does not support the right to shoot someone who is
>trying to steal your car. In a recent case, this was not considered
>grounds for self defense. 

Depends on if they're armed up here.  If'n they pull a gun on you (like in
a carjacking let's say) then you can shoot if you dare.


You do have to be very careful though.

My brother worked with a guy who was home sleeping during the day (was working
the mid-shift) and he heard "something" at his front door.  

Went downstairs with his gun to see what it was, came around the corner just
as this intruder, with a partner following behind, burst through the front
door which he had pried with a crowbar.

The guy fired at the intruder, and killed him daid instantly.   The partner
started to take off down the walk (at which point, my brother's friend couldn't
have shot him) but the intruder-partner was stupid enough to stop, turn around,
draw his gun and aim back at my brother's friend.   

That, as they say, was that.  Scratch one intruder-partner.


It took the cops about eight hours to determine that the whole thing was
justified.


'Saw
9.3666semi beastly concealementHBAHBA::HAAStime compressedThu Jul 20 1995 14:2514
>Depends on if they're armed up here.  If'n they pull a gun on you (like in
>a carjacking let's say) then you can shoot if you dare.

The local case wasn't this situation but I would think that if'n someone
pulls a gun on you you should be able to resist if'n you so choose.

NC just passed a concealed weapon law but it won't start until December.
I'm gonna get me a permit, fer sure. Right now it's against the law to
keep a gun under the seat or unlocked in the glove box. It is legal to
have it in clear view on your dash but I've heard tell of hassles that
ensue when it's blatant, including being stopped by uniform personnel and
asked why you have a gun out.

TTom
9.3667CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianThu Jul 20 1995 14:2819
>NC just passed a concealed weapon law but it won't start until December.
>I'm gonna get me a permit, fer sure. Right now it's against the law to
>keep a gun under the seat or unlocked in the glove box. It is legal to
>have it in clear view on your dash but I've heard tell of hassles that
>ensue when it's blatant, including being stopped by uniform personnel and
>asked why you have a gun out.

Up here, to have a pistol outside of your home (and that means your yard
even) you have to have a permit to carry, and the gun MUST be concealed.

If you have a permit, it can be in your car, anywhere or anyhow you want,
but concealed.

In a practical sense, it is recommended that if the gun is in your car it is
either in a case/range-bag, or on your person.  The cops don't take too kindly
to finding them under the seat, even if you DO have a permit to carry.


'Saw
9.3668whattabout?HBAHBA::HAAStime compressedThu Jul 20 1995 14:358
Saw,

This leads to something that I've always been curious about.

Suppose I take one of my guns and lock it in my trunk. That's legal in
NC. Then I cruise up to CT, am I now breaking their state law?

TTom
9.3669AKOCOA::BREENThu Jul 20 1995 14:524
    And the minute you cross the Mass border you're in deep dodo.  Then
    again, I haven't kept up with any possible changes in Mass but at one
    time having a weapon in the car without all the pertinent documentation
    was an automatic jail sentence.
9.3670CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianThu Jul 20 1995 14:5527
>This leads to something that I've always been curious about.
>
>Suppose I take one of my guns and lock it in my trunk. That's legal in
>NC. Then I cruise up to CT, am I now breaking their state law?


First off, depends on if it's a long gun or a handgun.   In CT long guns may be
transported in your car, and no permit is necessary for owning/carrying.


Your best bet would be to contact all the States involved in your trip and find
out what the requirements are for each state.

If you were passing through CT, the law would be different than if you were
coming up to stay for a bit, and it would be a different thing if you were
bringing the gun to either hunt or shoot in a tournament, or if you were
carrying it for personal protection.

Be really careful of Massachusetts.  They have wicked strict gun laws and you
really do need to contact them.  I may be wrong, but if I'm going to NH with
a rifle to hunt, let's say, I need some sort of temporary permit or something
to pass through Mass.  Again, I could be misinformed however.


'Saw


9.3671will take heedHBAHBA::HAAStime compressedThu Jul 20 1995 15:0411
Thanks for the info on Mass and the tip to contact the states.

I'm talking about handguns, here. Unloaded rifles are legal about anyway
you do it, including the ol' pick up gun racks method of display.

It sounds like I just plain shouldn't take a hand gun into Mass.

Hey you 2nd amendementers, how did this abridgement happen? Where was/is
the NRA in Mass?

TTom
9.3672IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Thu Jul 20 1995 15:148
>Hey you 2nd amendementers, how did this abridgement happen? Where was/is
>the NRA in Mass?

They're all up at the NASCAR races in Loudon, NH.

HTH.  :-) :-) :-)

Roland
9.3673CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianThu Jul 20 1995 15:1833
>
>It sounds like I just plain shouldn't take a hand gun into Mass.
>

Unless you have a Mass permit.

I've been told by someone who has one (a CT resident) that once you get your 
permit for the state you live it, it is not that difficult to get a Mass
permit.

You apply, making sure to note your permit #, and you pay the fee.  I'm not
sure how much more difficult it is.   

The hardest permits to get are New York City (ferget it) and New York in
general.

And again, there are different rules if you're going to be shooting
competitively, I believe.

In fact, whilst I've been thinking about it, I seem to vaguely remember hearing
or reading somewhere that it is okay to transport a handgun through Mass if you
are going to a competition, IF it is unloaded and stored away from the ammo.

But I'd double check that if I were you.


We probably should move this disucssion string to the Hunting/Guns note....


'Saw



9.3674CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianThu Jul 20 1995 15:1812
>
>They're all up at the NASCAR races in Loudon, NH.
>

Been there, done that.

Actually, the crowd at the races that weekend isn't as "wild" as the crowd for
the motorcycle races on Father's Day....


'Saw

9.3675MTWAIN::BURROWSVolkl: Smoke'm if you got'm.Thu Jul 20 1995 15:4925
              <<< Note 9.3671 by HBAHBA::HAAS "time compressed" >>>
                              -< will take heed >-

>>>I'm talking about handguns, here. Unloaded rifles are legal about anyway
>>>you do it, including the ol' pick up gun racks method of display.

Bzzzzt.  Wrong for MA. Go directly to jail.

Here in good ole MA (you remember the Lexington & Concord) you need a 
Firearms Identification Card (FID) to have a rifle or handgun ANYWHERE, 
including your house.  You need a License to Carry (LTC), as well as the 
FID card to have a handgun anywhere outside your house. 

Penalty for posession of any firearm without an FID card is a "mandatory" one 
year jail sentence.  I don't know the penalty for having a handgun without the 
LTC, even though you may have an FID.

I don't know how this applies to non-resident travelers.

If you think this is complicated, you should see the &%$$##?!! you have to 
go through (includes classes, etc. and arbitrary approval of your local police 
chief) to get either of these.

CBB

9.3676exMSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Thu Jul 20 1995 15:513
    
      Don't look now but somebody substituted the 'Gun Nut" note for
     the NFL one.  
9.3677ONOFRE::MAY_BRMich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &amp;1beerThu Jul 20 1995 16:395
    
    Maybe we could talk about the Blades brothers and tie it all together. 
    8^)
    
    brews
9.3678CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianThu Jul 20 1995 16:5931
|                              -< will take heed >-
|
|>>>I'm talking about handguns, here. Unloaded rifles are legal about anyway
|>>>you do it, including the ol' pick up gun racks method of display.
|
|Bzzzzt.  Wrong for MA. Go directly to jail.
|
|Here in good ole MA (you remember the Lexington & Concord) you need a 
|Firearms Identification Card (FID) to have a rifle or handgun ANYWHERE, 
|including your house.  You need a License to Carry (LTC), as well as the 
|FID card to have a handgun anywhere outside your house. 
|
|Penalty for posession of any firearm without an FID card is a "mandatory" one 
|year jail sentence.  I don't know the penalty for having a handgun without the 
|LTC, even though you may have an FID.
|
|I don't know how this applies to non-resident travelers.
|
|If you think this is complicated, you should see the &%$$##?!! you have to 
|go through (includes classes, etc. and arbitrary approval of your local police 
|chief) to get either of these.
|
|CBB


Moving this over to the hunting note.  I'll reply there....


'Saw


9.3679CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianThu Jul 20 1995 17:228
Heard on the radio whilst I was out at lunch that the Jets signed that guy from
the Steelers, Carlton Hasslerig.

Wasn't he the one with all the problems who left camp last year and never came
back?


'Saw
9.3680PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm DTN: 422-7253Thu Jul 20 1995 17:257
>> Heard on the radio whilst I was out at lunch that the Jets signed that guy from
>> the Steelers, Carlton Hasslerig.

>> Wasn't he the one with all the problems who left camp last year and never came
>> back?
    
    He's the one.  
9.3681CAMONE::WAYSoftware MorticianThu Jul 20 1995 17:305
>    He's the one.  

Then we know the Jets aren't going to win the Super Bowl any time soon. 8^)


9.3682Andersen's in AtlantaODIXIE::ZOGRANReasonable summer ratesFri Jul 21 1995 12:5610
    Falcons pick up K Morten Anderson, who was waived Wednesday by the
    Saints.  He got a signing bonus of $750,00, and a three year contract
    with base salaries of $500K, $550K, and $600K.
    
    Morten has kicked 5 game winning field games against the Falcons.
    
    Maybe the Falcons will go 6 - 10 now.  Gotta love that chuck n duck
    offense.
    
    UMDan
9.3683 Is a bonus a bonus?AKOCOA::BREENFri Jul 21 1995 16:044
    Does the player have the bonus as his or can he be cut later and not
    get it all.  Can Morten spend the 750k on a home and miss the next 20
    and still keep it?  Likewise of course I'm curious about Bledsoe's
    10-11 million "bonus".
9.3684bonus = guarenteed moneyCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Fri Jul 21 1995 16:216
    95% of the time an NFL "bonus" is the only guarenteed money a player
    will get. So yes Morten can go blow the 750k -taxes even if he falls
    off a bridge tomorrow. NFL players get paid week to week so if they get
    cut after the 8th game there out half of their salary.
    
    Mike
9.3685CNTROL::CHILDSWatch out Big Brother's watching!Fri Jul 21 1995 16:468
    
    yup same with Bledsoe. Of course He'll probably cash in on it all but
    only the bonus is guarenteed.......Of the bonus he gave a million
    to the macaroni and cheese guy's foundation and is startin his own
    foundation with another million. At this rate he's going to be
    bigger than Bird around these parts.........
    
    mike
9.3686Bird has no equal in Boston sports.USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jul 21 1995 17:395
>    At this rate he's going to be
>    bigger than Bird around these parts.........

Careful there Mikey....he ain't won nothin' yet.  And if he does, he'll
have to do it a few times before we put him "up there".
9.3687CNTROL::CHILDSWatch out Big Brother's watching!Fri Jul 21 1995 19:165
    
    I doubt it Joe. I think the popularity of football and his charity
    work (of which Bird did little if any) will put him over the top......
    
      mike
9.3688better take SandersCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Aug 07 1995 17:385
    
    I see the Raiders punched out the Cowboys lights on and off the
    field this week. Cancel the party Tommy...........
    
    mike
9.36892 suspended for drugsHBAHBA::HAASwake &amp; bakeFri Aug 11 1995 17:5512
Sign of the times.

What do the Arizona Cardinals and Cleveland Browns have in common? No not
that 'has XXX won YYY' thang.

They both employ drug users!

The NFL has suspended LB Jamir Miller of the Cardinals and DE Larry
Webster of the Browns. Miller got a 4 week vacation while Webster gets to
sit out 6 weeks.

TTom
9.3690WMGEN1::16.135.176.77::may_brBRUCE MAYFri Aug 11 1995 18:189
Cards are waiting for the shoe to drop on Chuck Levy too.  He's suing the 
NFL, so they are taking their time before they announce anything, but he's as 
dirty as a Yankee.

It's a good thing butty traded the #1 this year, look at how well the 
geennius did last year, 1st and 2nd rounder both a couple of druggies.

boC
9.3691ERICF::MAIEWSKIFri Aug 11 1995 18:529
  Anyone else hear the report about how most NFL players are either hooked on
or at least using sodium chloride? From what I hear it's the new white powder
of choice for many athletes and is even found sitting out in the open in many
areas frequented by NFL players.

  Question is, what's going to happen to our youth once word of this gets out?
Is our civilization doomed?

  George
9.3692OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Aug 11 1995 18:562
9.3693ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsFri Aug 11 1995 18:564
    
    Could be; high blood pressure can be a real killer...
    
    Joe
9.3694nomo HHH in Metrodome; for saleHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyWed Aug 16 1995 17:1413
pouring salt on old wounds ...

I've found a possible MrT sighting!

Seems that everything up his way is going down the crapper. The Metrodome
is going broke so they're gonna take off Hubert H. Humphrey's name.
They're then gonna try to sell the name to a corporate sponsor, asking 
$1 million per year.

It's either MrT or some conspiracy by the lunatic rights to slur the name
of a venerable liberal.

TTom
9.3695My favorite HHH memoryTNPUBS::NAZZAROHow can people live in Florida?Wed Aug 16 1995 19:396
    I'll never forget the time we booed him off the stage at UMass in 1968
    when he refused to answer questions about how he would handle ending
    the war in Vietnam.  Didn't want to discuss Vietnam, so us students
    weren't interested in anything else he had to say.
    
    NAZZ
9.3696SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Aug 16 1995 20:393
  Of course no one else had an answer that anyone wanted to hear either.

  George
9.3697Carter outODIXIE::ZOGRANReasonable summer ratesFri Aug 18 1995 18:355
    Just heard on the news that Ki-Jana Carter tore his ACL in
    last nights game and is lost for the season.
    
    UMDan
    
9.3698SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWERFri Aug 18 1995 19:274
    
    	Try one or two weeks pal...
    
    	WOOF!
9.3699Better livin' through chemistryODIXIE::ZOGRANReasonable summer ratesFri Aug 18 1995 20:465
    Don't be so sure.  Another update says he has a torn ACL.  But since he
    signed a $27M dollar contract they can just shoot him up and he'll be
    back next week:-)
    
    UMDan
9.3700BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredFri Aug 18 1995 20:506

	Just heard on the radio that the team says he's probably out for the
	season.  Klingler broke his jaw too.

	Kevin
9.3701Anybody tune in to last nights game with the boysAKOCOA::BREENTue Aug 22 1995 17:001
    So how did Dallas - Denver make out last night?
9.3702According to SportscenterTNPUBS::NAZZAROHow can people live in Florida?Tue Aug 22 1995 17:403
    Denver wins 20-17.  Late field goal.
    
    NAZZ
9.3703some waivingsHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyWed Aug 23 1995 16:5319
More news from the Turk.

Amongst those waived:

  o  Chuck Cecil, resident kamikaze haid tackler; by Cleveburgh
  o  Bucky Brooks, ex-Tar Heel, of interest to Panthers; by Buffalo
  o  Kirby Dar Dar, one of the bestest lasted names ever; by Miami

Amonst those not waived:

  o  Derrike Kennard, who retired but Jones won't accept it; by Dallas

Meanwhile, it wasn't clear if'n Donks Dan Williams is coming of going. 
Willliams, DE, was arrested on domestic violence charges.

Similarly, the Oilers aren't talking whether they've waived the turf on 
their field, still a subject or review by the league.

TTom
9.3704CAMONE::WAYPick 'em up and strutWed Aug 23 1995 16:544
>  o  Bucky Brooks, ex-Tar Heel, of interest to Panthers; by Buffalo


Doc's brother?  Or Doc in disguise?
9.3705a real Tar HeelHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyWed Aug 23 1995 16:585
Naw, aint no Doc 00:00:00 and shore aint no Ack, neither, too.

Brooks showed some good promise and he could make the Panthers easy.

TTom
9.3706gee, I'm shockedOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Aug 23 1995 19:311
9.3707Entire schedule ?FRSBEE::GROVESFri Aug 25 1995 11:225
    
        Does anyone know where I can get the entire 95-96 NFL schedule from
    NOTES ?
    
       Jim 
9.3708something like thisHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyFri Aug 25 1995 14:19339
*All Times Eastern
*WEEK 1
*Sunday, Sept. 3
	Cincinnati at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	Cleveland at New England, 1 p.m.
	Houston at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
	Carolina at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	San Francisco at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
	St. Louis at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
	New York Jets at Miami, 4 p.m.
	San Diego at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
	Kansas City at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	Arizona at Washington, 4 p.m.
	Minnesota at Chicago, 4 p.m.
	Buffalo at Denver, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Sept. 4
	Dallas at New York Giants, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 2
*Sunday, Sept. 10
	Miami at New England, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Houston, 1 p.m.
	New Orleans at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
	Carolina at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	New York Giants at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	Denver at Dallas, 4 p.m.
	Indianapolis at New York Jets, 4 p.m.
	Seattle at San Diego, 4 p.m.
	Jacksonville at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
	Atlanta at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Arizona, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Sept. 11
	Green Bay at Chicago, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 3
*Sunday, Sept. 17
	San Diego at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
	Indianapolis at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
	Cleveland at Houston, 1 p.m.
	St. Louis at Carolina, 1 p.m.
	Atlanta at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
	Arizona at Detroit, 1 p.m.
	New York Giants at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	New England at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	Jacksonville at New York Jets, 4 p.m.
	Washington at Denver, 4 p.m.
	Chicago at Tampa Bay, 4 p.m.
	Dallas at Minnesota, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Sept. 18
	Pittsburgh at Miami, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 4
	Open date: Buffalo, Carolina, Indianapolis, Miami, New England, Seattle
*Sunday, Sept. 24
	Chicago at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
	New Orleans at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
	Washington at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	Minnesota at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
	New York Jets at Atlanta, 4 p.m.
	Denver at San Diego, 4 p.m.
	Houston at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
	Kansas City at Cleveland, 4 p.m.
	Arizona at Dallas, 4 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
	Green Bay at Jacksonville, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Sept. 25
	San Francisco at Detroit, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 5
	Open date: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota
*Sunday, Oct. 1
	New England at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	Miami at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Carolina, 1 p.m.
	Philadelphia at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
	Dallas at Washington, 1 p.m.
	St. Louis at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	Kansas City at Arizona, 4 p.m.
	Jacksonville at Houston, 4 p.m.
	Denver at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	San Diego at Pittsburgh, 4 p.m.
	New York Giants at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
	Los Angeles at New York Jets, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Oct. 2
	Buffalo at Cleveland, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 6
	Open date: Atlanta, New Orleans, St. Louis, San Francisco
*Sunday, Oct. 8
	Cincinnati at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	New York Jets at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
	Green Bay at Dallas, 1 p.m.
	Washington at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
	Carolina at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	Houston at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
	Cleveland at Detroit, 4 p.m.
	Indianapolis at Miami, 4 p.m.
	Seattle at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
	Arizona at New York Giants, 4 p.m.
	Denver at New England, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Oct. 9
	San Diego at Kansas City, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 7
	Open date: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Pittsburgh
*Thursday, Oct. 12
	Atlanta at St. Louis, 8 p.m.
*Sunday, Oct. 15
	Seattle at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	New England at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
	Philadelphia at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Minnesota at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	San Francisco at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	Chicago at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
	Miami at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
	New York Jets at Carolina, 4 p.m.
	Washington at Arizona, 4 p.m.
	Dallas at San Diego, 4 p.m.
*Monday, Oct. 16
	Los Angeles at Denver, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 8
	Open date: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia
*Thursday, Oct. 19
	Cincinnati at Pittsburgh, 8 p.m.
*Sunday, Oct. 22
	Houston at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	Miami at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
	Jacksonville at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	New Orleans at Carolina, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Minnesota at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Atlanta at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	Kansas City at Denver, 4 p.m.
	Indianapolis at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
	San Diego at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	San Francisco at St. Louis, 4 p.m.
*Monday, Oct. 23
	Buffalo at New England, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 9
	Open date: Denver, Kansas City, Los Angeles, San Diego
*Sunday, Oct. 29
	Jacksonville at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
	New York Jets at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	Cleveland at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	Dallas at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	St. Louis at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
	Green Bay at Detroit, 1 p.m.
	Carolina at New England, 1 p.m.
	Buffalo at Miami, 4 p.m.
	Seattle at Arizona, 4 p.m.
	New Orleans at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Houston, 4 p.m.
	New York Giants at Washington, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Oct. 30
	Chicago at Minnesota, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 10
	Open date: Jacksonville, Tampa Bay
*Sunday, Nov. 5
	Buffalo at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	New England at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
	Houston at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	St. Louis at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
	Green Bay at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
	Washington at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Chicago, 4 p.m.
	Los Angeles at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
	Carolina at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
	Arizona at Denver, 4 p.m.
	New York Giants at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	Miami at San Diego, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Nov. 6
	Philadelphia at Dallas, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 11
	Open date: New York Jets, Washington
*Sunday, Nov. 12
	Indianapolis at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
	Los Angeles at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
	Atlanta at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	New England at Miami, 1 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Houston, 1 p.m.
	Seattle at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
	Carolina at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Detroit, 1 p.m.
	Chicago at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Kansas City at San Diego, 4 p.m.
	San Francisco at Dallas, 4 p.m.
	Minnesota at Arizona, 4 p.m.
	Denver at Philadelphia, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Nov. 13
	Cleveland at Pittsburgh, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 12
*Sunday, Nov. 19
	Seattle at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Jacksonville at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
	Indianapolis at New England, 1 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	St. Louis at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	Arizona at Carolina, 1 p.m.
	New York Giants at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	Green Bay at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	San Diego at Denver, 4 p.m.
	Buffalo at New York Jets, 4 p.m.
	Dallas at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
	New Orleans at Minnesota, 4 p.m.
	Houston at Kansas City, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Nov. 20
	San Francisco at Miami, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 13
*Thursday, Nov. 23
	Minnesota at Detroit, 12:30 p.m.
	Kansas City at Dallas, 4 p.m.
*Sunday, Nov. 26
	Miami at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
	New England at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
	Chicago at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Washington, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Denver at Houston, 4 p.m.
	New York Jets at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Cleveland, 4 p.m.
	St. Louis at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
	Atlanta at Arizona, 4 p.m.
	Carolina at New Orleans, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Nov. 27
	Los Angeles at San Diego, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 14
*Thursday, Nov. 30
	New York Giants at Arizona, 8 p.m.
*Sunday, Dec. 3
	Indianapolis at Carolina, 1 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Houston at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
	Atlanta at Miami, 1 p.m.
	New Orleans at New England, 1 p.m.
	St. Louis at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
	Jacksonville at Denver, 4 p.m.
	Kansas City at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
	Cleveland at San Diego, 4 p.m.
	Washington at Dallas, 4 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Seattle, 4 p.m.
	Buffalo at San Francisco, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Dec. 4
	Chicago at Detroit, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 15
*Saturday, Dec. 9
	Cleveland at Minnesota, 12:30 p.m.
	Arizona at San Diego, 4 p.m.
*Sunday, Dec. 10
	Buffalo at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
	New York Jets at New England, 1 p.m.
	Indianapolis at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
	New Orleans at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	San Francisco at Carolina, 1 p.m.
	Dallas at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
	Chicago at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	Detroit at Houston, 1 p.m.
	Seattle at Denver, 4 p.m.
	Pittsburgh at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
	Washington at New York Giants, 4 p.m.
	Green Bay at Tampa Bay, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Dec. 11
	Kansas City at Miami, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 16
*Saturday, Dec. 16
	New England at Pittsburgh, 12:30 p.m.
	Green Bay at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
*Sunday, Dec. 17
	Jacksonville at Detroit, 1 p.m.
	Miami at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	Cincinnati at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
	New York Jets at Houston, 1 p.m.
	Atlanta at Carolina, 1 p.m.
	Arizona at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
	Tampa Bay at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	Washington at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
	Denver at Kansas City, 4 p.m.
	San Diego at Indianapolis, 4 p.m.
	New York Giants at Dallas, 4 p.m.
	Los Angeles at Seattle, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Dec. 18
	Minnesota at San Francisco, 9 p.m.
	------
*WEEK 17
*Saturday, Dec. 23
	San Diego at New York Giants, 12:30 p.m.
	Detroit at Tampa Bay, 4 p.m.
	New England at Indianapolis, 8 p.m.
*Sunday, Dec. 24
	Pittsburgh at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
	Houston at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
	Seattle at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
	Cleveland at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
	San Francisco at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
	Philadelphia at Chicago, 1 p.m.
	New Orleans at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
	Minnesota at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
	Carolina at Washington, 4 p.m.
	Denver at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
	Miami at St. Louis, 4 p.m.
*Monday, Dec. 25
	Dallas at Arizona, 9 p.m.
	------
*Playoffs
*Saturday, Dec. 30
	AFC and NFC Wild Cards
*Sunday, Dec. 31
	AFC and NFC Wild Cards
*Saturday, Jan. 6
	AFC and NFC Divisional Playoffs
*Sunday, Jan. 7
	AFC and NFC Divisional Playoffs
*Sunday, Jan. 14
	AFC and NFC Championships
*Sunday, Jan. 28
	Super Bowl at Tempe, Ariz.
*Sunday, Feb. 4
	Pro Bowl at Honolulu
9.3709Comments from AtlantaODIXIE::ZOGRANGive it to the kid!Mon Aug 28 1995 19:2120
    Couple of comments from Len Pasquarelli regarding teams this year -
    
    Patriots - "Chic pick by bandwagon-jumpers, but Bill Parcell's club
    still looks to be a year away"
    
    Cleveland - "Nasty team with an attitude, but is this a club with a
    Super bowl-caliber quaterback?"
    
    Pittsburgh - "Best defense in league by far. Will benefit from addition
    of former Falcons PK Norm Johnson."
    
    Giants - "Most important ex-Georgian in Big Apple isn't Herschel
    Walker, but Dan Reeves."
    
    Cardinals - "All Buddy Ryan needs is a little offense, and that's
    probably all he's got, too."
    
    UMDan
    Washington - "With Heath Shuler still clueless, patience of Jack Kent
    Cooke will be severely tested."
9.3710OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Aug 28 1995 19:537
9.3711CAMONE::WAYPick 'em up and strutTue Aug 29 1995 12:5611
Giants o-line is banged up, and they have no pass rush.  Other than that....

Actually, if the o-line was healthy, I'd feel more comfortable about the
upcoming season.  Dave Brown is improving, and his work with DeBerg is
definitely paying off.

But if we don't have a decent d-line, then the Giants will get manhandled.
I'm thinking the Cowboys will do just that next Monday night.


'Saw
9.3712Foster release confirmed?MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Aug 29 1995 13:488
	Any confirmation on the Panthers releasing Foster?

	He's one talented individual.  I'm sure he'll be picked up right away.




	billl
9.3713SNAX::ERICKSONWhere is the grass greener?Tue Aug 29 1995 14:0612
    
    	Yes, Barry Foster was released by the Panthers. The Panthers are
    concerned with his past injuries. Also his lack of production this
    pre-season. He only gained ~69 yrds. His left ankle and right knee
    are bothering him. This is surprising because the expansion teams can
    have 56 players on there rosters. Three more then the rest of the
    league.
    	Don't know how quick he will be picked up. Teams just cut down to
    53 players. If they claim him off of waivers. They have to honor his
    contract and fit him under the salary cap.
    
    Ron
9.3714Barry - agile but fragileDECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Tue Aug 29 1995 14:0812
    
	>> Any confirmation on the Panthers releasing Foster?
    
           Yup. It's in today's Globe. Barry hadn't put in a full week 
           of practice due to nagging injuries. I'm sure Jake is just
           crushed to hear that Barry's out of a job.
    
           
           PS - I'm sure Barry's release will hit the New Hampshire papers
                shortly after you guys get the news about the troubles in
                Bosnia.
       
9.3715IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 29 1995 14:2316
>           PS - I'm sure Barry's release will hit the New Hampshire papers
>                shortly after you guys get the news about the troubles in
>                Bosnia.

Let's see - you live in greater metro Clinton, don't you?  I'm sure the local
paper had a stringer at the Carolina Panther camp.  Up here (Nashua), the
Telegraph gets us more complete sports news than that day's Globe (though we
do miss out on the "brilliance" of Dan Shaughnessy).  So try to relax a little
on the cheap shots.

Given the state of the Pats running game, do they have enough under the salary
cap to try and get Foster?  We've already got Meggett for a 3rd-down back and
a rookie in Curtis Martin who can play on 1st down.  Barry would only have to
play on 2nd down... :-)

Roland
9.3716;^)MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Aug 29 1995 14:269
           
>           PS - I'm sure Barry's release will hit the New Hampshire papers
>                shortly after you guys get the news about the troubles in
>                Bosnia.

	Bonsia???  


	billl
9.3717IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 29 1995 14:303
>	Bonsia???  

Are those the little trees you're supposed to keep trimming down?
9.3718Foster outta hereHBAHBA::HAASlifepath perturbanceTue Aug 29 1995 14:3130
Foster be gone.

Officially, this move was made because of concern for his injuries and
his failure to produce. Unofficially, barely, Foster was waived because
of his his attitude and his work ethic, or more precisely, his lack
therein.

Capers after giving Foster every chance eventually got tired of his
crying and whining. Capers insulated Foster from every pressure. He
defended him in front of the press who were noting his lack of effort
in practice. The final straw was lasted game against the Giants. Foster
was medically clear to compete but refused to play.

The local rag's headline says it all:

	Foster just doesn't cut it

Capers stated that one of the problems that Foster was causing with his
high salary and no effort was that some of the other veterans, who are
being payed less that Fosters' 2.5+ mil, were really busting their ass to
both get in shape, learn the system and lend a helping hand to this young
and inexperienced team. 

So, it looks like running back by committee. Randy Baldwin is expected to
get more carries. Derek Moore has come over from Detroit and he'll
probably see some action, if'n the Panthers can get close to the goal
line. The right side of the line has 2 rookies and the mainstay of the
left has gonde down. This aint exactly the kinda help they need.

TTom
9.3719AKOCOA::BREENTue Aug 29 1995 14:326
    So what's happening in Bosnia?  Someone try to hit the ArchDuke again?
    
    Telegraph may have some west coast action when Glove doesn't but I like
    to read some writing once in awhile - btw like Ryans "Patriots A-Z" the
    other day but that's an easy one, Pats factual history is wierder than
    any fiction and apparently only half of it has ever been told.
9.3720IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 29 1995 14:378
>    Telegraph may have some west coast action when Glove doesn't but I like
>    to read some writing once in awhile

True, but I didn't go to BC, so there's usually not much for me to read in
the Globe other than Bob Ryan... :-)

Actually, I owe Tommy Brydie an apology for the knee-jerk reaction - I just
get sick and tired of New Hampshire getting dumped on.
9.3721From the White mtns to the cornfieldsAKOCOA::BREENTue Aug 29 1995 15:0116
    Roland you must be new to New Hampshire, nobody up here cares what
    Mass-folks think even though half are from there.  The natives who go
    back a few generations have never been there or have spent much more
    time in Canada than Mass.
    
    And for the Glove, just remember Shaugnassy(sic) is from HolyCross but
    a whole slew of them are from BC not to speak of a whole lot of other
    writers.  In fact I just saw in Zylers a history of the ncaa which tho
    interesting was way overpriced but I bought it anyway since it was
    written by another BC alum, Joe Gergen.
    
    Pretty interesting especially the '39-60 part and all the teams that
    have at least made the round of 16 (Brown?,Cornell).  Only team I can
    think of that's never gone that far is ...
    
    		N E B R A S K A
9.3722MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Aug 29 1995 15:028
	Mr Duprez,

	As long as it's coming from The Peoples Republic of Mass, who cares.




	billl
9.3723IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 29 1995 15:085
>	Mr Duprez,

Wow.  *No one* calls me Mr...

On the rare occasions when they do, I keep looking around for my dad.
9.3724IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 29 1995 15:094
>	As long as it's coming from The Peoples Republic of Mass, who cares.

I try and avoid the cheap shots in the other direction, too, hence my apology
for "greater metro Clinton"...
9.3725CAMONE::WAYPick 'em up and strutTue Aug 29 1995 15:214
If someone hit the Archduke again, then I'm in serious trouble.

I haven't qualified with the Springfield '03.  Isn't that the firearm that's
required when the Archduke gets hit?
9.3726a real sportHBAHBA::HAASlifepath perturbanceTue Aug 29 1995 15:238
So far we got politics, religion and guns.

Can twinkies and woodies be very far away...

And oh by the way, y'all can quit pretending you like baseball cause
football is here. MLB can go into hiding again.

TTom
9.3727CAMONE::WAYPick 'em up and strutTue Aug 29 1995 15:2512
>
>Can twinkies and woodies be very far away...
>


Well, twinkies are good when you're at the range trying to qualify with t
the '03.  To increase their ability to "stick to your ribs" smear a little
cheez-whiz on the twinkie...

'Saw


9.3728amateursHBAHBA::HAASlifepath perturbanceTue Aug 29 1995 15:569
I hear you can use a bit of the inside twinkie stuff to mark the end of
the barrell which helps ya aim and it's better'n spit a la Alvin York.

Dint he use a_'03?

And speaking of guns, this should be the lasted year in the NFL for the
run and shoot. Leave that to the college folks, dontcha know.

TTom
9.3729CAMONE::WAYPick 'em up and strutTue Aug 29 1995 16:067
>
>Dint he use a_'03?
>

Yep.

Alvin York, now there was a man's man.....
9.3730best oxymoron I've seen in yearsOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Aug 29 1995 16:351
9.3731CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Aug 30 1995 14:458
    
    Does anyone know what the job functions of either an Offensive or 
    Defensive Quality Control Coach are?????????
    
    Do they make sure there's plenty of gatorde? Or maybe take the 
    pictures of the opponent's sets????
    
    mike
9.3732CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MWed Aug 30 1995 14:526
>    
>    Does anyone know what the job functions of either an Offensive or 
>    Defensive Quality Control Coach are?????????
>    

That's a new one on me......
9.3733PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFWed Aug 30 1995 15:489
>    
>    Does anyone know what the job functions of either an Offensive or 
>    Defensive Quality Control Coach are?????????
>    

  Those are the guys who are in charge of implementing 6 Sigma for their
  respective teams.

	Keith
9.3734OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Aug 30 1995 16:031
9.3735Strength of Schedule ChartCAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MThu Aug 31 1995 12:3349
In case anyone is interested, here's a strength of schedule chart, 
provided to me from EPSNet via my good man Dave 'Pistol' Parker from 
Giants notes.


================================================================================
Note 264.5      The official 1995 season prognostication note!!!!        5 of 12
UNXA::PARKER "NJ Devils: 94-95 Stanley Cup champs!"  43 lines  29-AUG-1995 13:35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<snip>

For the record, it's the 7th.

From ESPNet:

TEAM            OPPONENTS' 1994        GAMES VS     GAMES VS
              WIN PCT. AND RECORD    +.500 TEAMS  PLAYOFF TEAMS
San Diego      .543      139-117        9              6
New England    .533      128-112        6              6
Green Bay      .525      126-114       10              9
Minnesota      .523      134-122       10             10
Cincinnati     .522      117-107        9              8
New Orleans    .522      117-107        7              6
NY Giants      .520      133-123        8              7
Atlanta        .518      116-108        6              6
Detroit        .517      124-116        9              9
Houston        .513      115-109        8              8
Kansas City    .512      131-125        9              6
Washington     .508      122-118        7              4
Arizona        .504      121-119        8              6
Dallas         .504      129-127        8              5
Indianapolis   .504      113-111        7              6
St. Louis      .504      113-111        5              5
Miami          .500      128-128        6              6
Denver         .496      119-121        8              6
San Francisco  .496      111-113        6              5
Buffalo        .492      118-122        6              6
Oakland        .492      126-130        7              6
Pittsburgh     .487      109-115       10              9
Philadelphia   .481      123-133        7              4
Seattle        .479      115-125        7              4
Chicago        .469      105-119        8              7
Cleveland      .469      105-119        8              8
NY Jets        .469      105-119        5              4
Carolina       .465      119-137        4              4
Tampa Bay      .457      107-117        9              9
Jacksonville   .453      116-140        7              7

9.3736SF isn't much betterOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Aug 31 1995 18:411
9.3737MNF has the ratings slot wrapped, so go new format....CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MTue Sep 05 1995 18:0443
I watched the Giants last night get demolished by the Cowboys, and I've
put my remarks in about that in here already.

But you know, as I was watching the game I couldn't help but think it's
time for a change on ABC's Monday Night Football.

Frank Gifford has been in the booth for 25 years, and last night he sounded
every bit like he definitely had.  As Imus would say, "pin his name and
address on his windbreaker and send him out to the dog track."

I was reminded slightly of President Reagan's later years when there would
be these almost imperceptible gaps, wherein you could hear the gears of his
brain grinding while it tried to find something, anything, to say.

Dan Dierdork, well, I mean, his little vignette on his former teammates who
write with large crayons was so enlightening, and even Al Michaels stumbled all
over the place last night.


Other highlights include them asking Frank to have Kathy Lee bring up the
Notre Dame loss to egRegis on their show, then inexplicably dropping this
little "she owes us one" and having about five seconds of dead air follow
that.  Like any of the us viewers knew what the hell they were talking about.


Or the wonderful englightening remarks about "Well, it's September, it must
be a 'possum huntin' moon," followed up by Frank witty rejoinder "in this area
they have a hard time crossing the street."


Fellows, it just ain't happening.....

I'm almost of the mind that they should can all three, and go to a two
man crew -- almost any two would be better than these three.  Hell, you
could put Dan Jiggets in there and he'd be more on the ball than Dan Dierdork.

Go to a two man crew.  Years ago folks might have tuned in now for the
witty repartee of Dan, Frank and Howard, but nowadays, there's not closely
resembling wit coming out of the booth.  What we're getting is more like
something that rhymes with "wit."


'Saw
9.3738SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Sep 05 1995 18:159
  How quickly they forget ... what it was like ... to listen to the ponderings
... of the announcer ... who worked ... with Frank Gifford ... so many years
ago. 

  One can only think back ... to the gaps ... between the words ... of which
there were so many ... so unrelated ... to the proceedings taking place ...
on the field.

  George
9.3739CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MTue Sep 05 1995 18:3017
|  How quickly they forget ... what it was like ... to listen to the ponderings
|... of the announcer ... who worked ... with Frank Gifford ... so many years
|ago. 
|
|  One can only think back ... to the gaps ... between the words ... of which
|there were so many ... so unrelated ... to the proceedings taking place ...
|on the field.

I'm not forgetting.  Listening to Howard fumble and stumble and ramble
was interesting, because he could really dig himself a hole, and every once
in a while he'd dig so deep he'd actually dig himself OUT of the hole.

And for all his foibles, he was an intelligent man.

This crew right now just doesn't get it done....

'Saw
9.3740Turn out the lightsOLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyologistTue Sep 05 1995 18:353
    
    Look on the bright side, It could be Brent Musberger, Dierdork, and
    Hank Stram!!
9.3741Whoa NellieAD::HEATHNew England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl ChampsTue Sep 05 1995 18:417
    
    
      Granted he only does college football now but the best football
    announcer I have ever heard still works for ABC.  I'd love to see
    him in the booth.
    
    Jerry
9.3742ODIXIE::ZOGRANGive it to the kid!Tue Sep 05 1995 18:4212
    I just tuned in for a couple of minutes (Novachek lost the ball at the
    goal line), and they were blathering on about what a great coach Reeves
    was - "He's right up there with the elite of coaching. What a genius,
    etc.".  Couldn't help but thinking "How many SB rings is he (Reeves)
    wearing? Huh- thought so.".
    
    Maybe one of the local radio stations carries the games so I won't have
    to listen to those guys.
    
    Are the Gnats that bad or the 'Boys that good?
    
    UMDan
9.3743give'm a chanceOLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyologistTue Sep 05 1995 19:038
    
    
    Youz still knocking Reeves. This man has taken some pretty poor talent
    and turned them into winners in a few years. First game  of the year
    and people are looking for new coach. They ran into a very hot Cowboy 
    team last night. Heck they havent beaten the Cowboys when it meant
    anything for a few years now. With the talent that he has to work with
    why does anyone expect him to do any better.
9.3744CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MWed Sep 06 1995 12:1935
>    Youz still knocking Reeves. This man has taken some pretty poor talent
>    and turned them into winners in a few years. First game  of the year
>    and people are looking for new coach. They ran into a very hot Cowboy 
>    team last night. Heck they havent beaten the Cowboys when it meant
>    anything for a few years now. With the talent that he has to work with
>    why does anyone expect him to do any better.


The Giants ARE that bad, and the Cowboys were that good.

Dan Reeves, in Denver, had a knack for taking poor talent teams, getting
them to over-achieve, mainly with not much defense and an offense that was
pretty decent, and a QB who could pull Dan's butt out of the fire late (a lot).

In New York, Dan Reeves has molded what was once a decent Giants team into
a likeness of the Broncos.  Yes, he's business-like and professional, but
so is Marv Levy.

Dan Reeves favors speed over size on defense.  Look where it got them Monday
night.  The Cowboys couldn't (too often) sweep the Giants, or pull, because
the lateral pursuit was there.  But the Cowboys have a brutish, stud line.
Just block straight ahead.   Emmitt had a 50 yard wide hole to run through
untouched to the goal line - shoot, he probably thought he was out there
running a wind sprint.


Dan Reeves is a good coach, not a great coach, and I have serious doubts about
his ability to EVER win a Super Bowl, with the Giants or anyone else.

And to be fair, the other half of the problem is George Young, but I don't
even wanna get going on him....


'Saw

9.3745IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Wed Sep 06 1995 12:485
> Yes, he's business-like and professional, but
> so is Marv Levy.

And Marv Levy has taken his team to four Super Bowls, which is a
pretty good coaching job in and of itself...
9.3746May the best team win [they don't always]SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 06 1995 12:5814
  I think you guys are rating going to a Super Bowl just a bit too high. Yes
it's an indication of how good a coach is but it's not everything. There have
been a number of times when the 2nd best team was beat by the best team in the
NFC or AFC Championship game but that doesn't mean that the coach of that team
was any worse than the team from who made it from the other Conference. 

  And then there are upsets. Some times a really well coached team just has a
bad day in the playoffs and gets eliminated. 

  Granted in football the better team is more likely to win a game than in
basketball or baseball but still any single game elimination format doesn't
prove who is the better team it only proves which team did better. 

  George 
9.3747CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MWed Sep 06 1995 13:2114
Second place is the first loser.  Don't ever forget that.

If you're a coach in the NFL you're not out there to "do a good coaching job"

You're selected as a coach because ultimately the ownership of the team
wants you to get them a championship.

Dan Reeves has gotten his teams to overachieve in a lot of instances.  That's
a great thing.  But there are also certain flaws in Dan Reeves.  One is his
philosophy of defense, at least as it applies to what's going on in the 
NFC East.


'Saw
9.3748IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Wed Sep 06 1995 13:363
>Second place is the first loser.  Don't ever forget that.

Stop stealing slogans from "No Fear" T-shirts!!!  :-)
9.3749I guess I'm in the wrong generation....CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MWed Sep 06 1995 13:549
|>Second place is the first loser.  Don't ever forget that.
|
|Stop stealing slogans from "No Fear" T-shirts!!!  :-)


Oh, is that on a t-shirt?  Didn't know that....

My brother has been saying that for about three years now.  Maybe that's
where he saw it....
9.3750SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 06 1995 14:0119
RE              <<< Note 9.3747 by CAMONE::WAY "We aim by P.F.M" >>>

>You're selected as a coach because ultimately the ownership of the team
>wants you to get them a championship.

  Sure, but just because you don't do that doesn't mean you are a lousy coach,
nor does it mean you can't do it in the future. It may just mean that you were
unlucky, especially with a 1 game elimination format. 

  Given a choice between a coach that steadily built a winning team over 2 or 3
years then lost a couple close playoff games versus a coach with a losing
record who got the 3rd Wild Card then got to the Super Bowl with a few
obviously lucky wins, I'd go with the 1st coach. His chances of winning in the
future would be much better than the guy who got lucky that one time. 

  Performance in the playoffs is something but it's not an iron clad indicator
of who's likely to be an effective coach in the future and who is not. 

  George
9.3751CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MWed Sep 06 1995 14:0216
|
|  Sure, but just because you don't do that doesn't mean you are a lousy coach,
|nor does it mean you can't do it in the future. It may just mean that you were
|unlucky, especially with a 1 game elimination format. 
|

I'm not basing my opinion solely on that.


>  Performance in the playoffs is something but it's not an iron clad indicator
>of who's likely to be an effective coach in the future and who is not. 


never said it was....

'Saw
9.3752MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Wed Sep 06 1995 14:2112
  >> Granted in football the better team is more likely to win a 
  >> game than in basketball or baseball but still any single game 
  >> elimination format doesn't prove who is the better team it only 
  >> proves which team did better. 

     Completely absurd. You're not talking about the NCAA basketball
     tourney where you may not know your next opponent until a day or
     two before the game and may not have seen any film of them. Given 
     the amount of preparation each team has in the NFL and the amount of
     film coaches watch - 99% of the time the best prepared team wins. Luck
     plays a very small part in it.
9.3753You too can get rich quick!!!TNPUBS::NAZZARONBA action - it's nonexistantWed Sep 06 1995 14:325
    Hey 'Saw - I'm thinkin' you outta put out a whole line of t-shirts,
    based on stuff people have said in ::SPROTS!!!!!  You'd be a
    gazillionaire in no time!!!!!
    
    NAZZ
9.3754IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Wed Sep 06 1995 14:382
Gotta be careful of all the trademarking, though!
9.3755CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MWed Sep 06 1995 14:5821
Nazz, it's a great idea, BUT....

	These folks in SPORTS whine about everything (myself included).

	Could you see it if I put out a shirt with a saying, and nexted
	thing you know, everybody and their brother would be saying

		"Saw, you got it wrong, I didn't say it like that"....


I'd never have a moment's peace!


But I'll tell you this -- one of these years I'm going to write a book based on
these past bunch o' years in SPROTS.  It'll definitely be some sort of satire,
and of course it will have the obligatory disclaimer on the copyright page
about it being a work of fiction and any resemblance to persons living or dead
etc etc etc, but oh what a fun time I'll have....


'aw
9.3756ODIXIE::ZOGRANGive it to the kid!Wed Sep 06 1995 14:596
    Yeah, we'll all be lining up for that fuscia T-Shirt that says
    
    "YABBUT WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME (enter non-Cleveland team name here)
    EVER WON A CHAMPIONSHIP!"
    
    UMDan
9.3757CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MWed Sep 06 1995 15:0217
|
|    Yeah, we'll all be lining up for that fuscia T-Shirt that says
|    
|    "YABBUT WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME (enter non-Cleveland team name here)
|    EVER WON A CHAMPIONSHIP!"
|    
|    UMDan


I made the mistake of taking a big drink of water, just before this
note popped up on the screen.   I now have enough water in my sinuses to
last a life time.....


8^)


9.3758CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Sep 06 1995 15:058
    
    Dan Reeves is an over-rated bum. Dan Reeves' record if broken down
    would show that he consistently beats up on lesser teams and lost more
    often than not to teams of equal talent or better talent. If Dan Reeves
    was a good coach he would beat teams better than his own atleast 50% of
    the time. Dan Reeves' motivalition skills rival Valium's........
    
     mike
9.3759USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Sep 06 1995 15:078
>                                -< Whoa Nellie >-
>      Granted he only does college football now but the best football
>    announcer I have ever heard still works for ABC.  I'd love to see
>    him in the booth.

He did MNF in the beginning and failed.  His "shtick" doesn't cut it on
NFL games.  MNF requires color from the announcing team.  It's more than
a game, and I agree with 'Saw, this crew has had it.
9.3760ERICF::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 06 1995 15:1126
RE    <<< Note 9.3752 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!" >>>

>     Completely absurd. You're not talking about the NCAA basketball
>     tourney where you may not know your next opponent until a day or
>     two before the game and may not have seen any film of them. Given 
>     the amount of preparation each team has in the NFL and the amount of
>     film coaches watch - 99% of the time the best prepared team wins. Luck
>     plays a very small part in it.

  Great Tommy, at least you are now admitting that the NCAA tourney is no
indicator of who's the best team. That's a big change from your claim a year
or so ago about how it was the greatest thing around.

  So if someone wins an AFC or NFC championship by 1 point because the 48 yard
field goal they kicked with 2 seconds remaining hooked but just squeaked inside
the goal post then there is no luck at all involved in that win? 

  I suppose they planned everything including the gust of wind that died just
before the ball crossed the bar that would have forced the ball to go wide if
they had kicked it 3 seconds earlier?

  Right, no luck at all. ATC systems struggle trying to figure out when wind
sheer will cause a 737 to crash but football coaches have every gust of wind
planed a week in advance. No luck involved at all.

  George
9.3761OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Sep 06 1995 15:514
9.3762MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Wed Sep 06 1995 16:2125
  >> Great Tommy, at least you are now admitting that the NCAA tourney
  >> is no indicator of who's the best team. That's a big change from your 
  >> claim a year or so ago about how it was the greatest thing around.

    It is still the best event in all of sports. The fact that a Cinderella
    team can knock off a national power (see UCSB vs. Arizona) is one of
    the things that make it great, George. Unpredictability. The NFL is
    anything but.


 >> Right, no luck at all. ATC systems struggle trying to figure out when 
 >> wind sheer will cause a 737 to crash but football coaches have every 
 >> gust of wind planed a week in advance. No luck involved at all.

    Get real, George. In the last twenty five years only one conference 
    championship game has been decided by a single point, SF over Dallas
    in 1981. And only one game has been decided by two points - Giants 
    over SF in 1990. There have been a handful of three point games but
    the vast majority have been four points or more. Note that in each 
    of the two closest games the two participants were powerhouses and
    the winner went on to take it all. You may consider that "luck" but
    I think it would be more accurate to say that they were the best
    teams in the league.
    
9.3763ERICF::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 06 1995 16:4217
  Was San Diego the best the AFC had to offer? Yeah they had the record but
were they really that much better than the Bucks or Dolphins or did they just
have a few more lucky wins? 

  I'll never forget that N.F.C Championship game between the Browns and Packers
that was won by a kick into the snow that to this day no one can agree if it
was really good or not. 

  Then there was B.C.'s Miracle win over N.D. on that long field goal. 

  Didn't the Giants win a Super Bowl over the Bills a few years back because
someone missed an easy kick? If so does that make Parcells a great coach? Would
he have been less of a coach if the guy hadn't hooked it (or what ever
happened) and the Bills had won? 

  George 
9.3764MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Wed Sep 06 1995 16:5625
  >> Then there was B.C.'s Miracle win over N.D. on that long field goal. 

     BC outplayed ND all day and really shouldn't have put themselves in
     the position to need the field goal. 

  >> Didn't the Giants win a Super Bowl over the Bills a few years 
  >> back because someone missed an easy kick? If so does that make 
  >> Parcells a great coach? 

     Scott Norwood didn't miss "an easy kick". He missed a 47 yarder.
     Those ain't automatic. As for Parcells, in the playoffs that year 
     the Bills had scored 44 points against Miami and 51 against the
     Raiders in the AFC title game (lucky, huh?), they only scored
     19 against the Giants.

    I'm not saying that upsets don't occur but to say that the NFL playoffs
    don't determine who the best team is because it's a single elimination
    format is ridiculous. The Bill Parcells and Bill Walshes and Jimmy
    Johnsons don't leave things to chance. That's why their teams are at
    or near the top year after year. It certainly isn't just because they're 
    lucky.
    
    
    BTW - the Bucs play in the NFC not the AFC, George.
9.3765WMGEN1::abs004p7.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYWed Sep 06 1995 17:066
Tommy, I was gonna forget about you calling Santa Clara UCSB and the '81 
49ers a powerhouse if you would overlook George calling the Pitts baseball 
team or the Milwaukee NBA team an AFc member.

Brews
9.3766SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 06 1995 17:2523
RE    <<< Note 9.3764 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!" >>>

>     BC outplayed ND all day and really shouldn't have put themselves in
>     the position to need the field goal. 

  They didn't exactly outplay ND during the 2nd half, ND was going through
the B.C. defense like it wasn't there. Still my point is that you can't say
either coach is or is not good just because of that one game. No one game
proves who is or is not a good coach.

>     Scott Norwood didn't miss "an easy kick". He missed a 47 yarder.
>     Those ain't automatic. As for Parcells, in the playoffs that year 
>     the Bills had scored 44 points against Miami and 51 against the
>     Raiders in the AFC title game (lucky, huh?), they only scored
>     19 against the Giants.

  ... and what if that kick had been good? Would that have meant that despite
those other games Parcells would have been a lousy coach? That's what I'm
arguing here, according to what I've been hearing if a coach doesn't win the
big one he's no good. Would Parcells have been a terrible coach if that kick 
had been good?

  George
9.3767MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Wed Sep 06 1995 18:5414
  >> according to what I've been hearing if a coach doesn't win the
  >> big one he's no good. 

    No, what you've been hearing is that if a coach doesn't win the big
    one he's not *great*. The league is full of good coaches. There are
    only a few *great* ones. I honestly didn't realize what a coach
    Parcells was before he got here. I always figured he'd had plenty
    to work with in NY. Then he gets here and turns around a pretty woeful
    franchise. And LT thanks Big Tuna during his HoF induction for "teaching
    him the game of football". And then Phil Simms says pretty much the 
    same thing during halftime of the Dallas-Giants game. All that is not
    the residue of luck.
    
9.3768the players carried him offCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Sep 06 1995 19:075
    
    everybody knows Buddy Ryan won that Superbowl not Ditka. Just ask
    Buddy!
    
    ;^)
9.3769Cowboys have loads of talents....BSS::MENDEZWed Sep 06 1995 19:138
    there is no way in hell that the giants have near as much talent as
    the cowboys.  The cowboys have arguably the most talent in the 
    league on both sides of the ball.  In fact with Williams back, the
    cowboys have to be looked at as the team to beat..  If they get Deion
    they won't miss K. Smith at all.  Dan Reeves may not be a great coach
    but, the Giants are not in the same class as the Cowboys with respect
    to talent.  What do you think Switzer would do with the Giants?????
    
9.3770SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 06 1995 19:1325
  Fine but what if that guy had hit that field goal and LT had gotten a season
ending injury in game 2 of the other year he won? Would that have meant that
Parcells was not a great coach because he hadn't won the big one? 

  No, he would have been just as great a coach only he would have had worse
luck. 

  And what about Shulla, is he a great coach or not? There have been times when
he's won, times when he's come close but lost, and times when he was not in
contention. Does he go back and forth between great, good, and lousy or does
his luck change from year to year? 

  In particular, what about the year he got to the Superbowl because Miami beat
K.C. in that double overtime Christmas day game? Remember Stenerew missing two
sudden death field goals then Yupremian hitting one for the win? Was that all
skill on Shulla's part or was he just lucky that the best kicker in the AFC
missed two field goals that he normally would have made? 

  Then take Ditka for another example. He won with McMann as QB and the next
year McMann got injured and that made the difference, the Bears couldn't win.
Was Ditka a great coach the year McMann was healthy and a good but not great
coach the year McMann was hurt or was he a great coach both years who was lucky
one year then unlucky the next year? 

  George 
9.3771IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Wed Sep 06 1995 19:163
George, I think I agreed with your original point, but you've *completely*
lost me...
9.3772MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Wed Sep 06 1995 19:3510
 
  >> In particular, what about the year he got to the Superbowl because 
  >> Miami beat K.C. in that double overtime Christmas day game?

     Miami has been to the SB four times. They did it in '72, '73, '74
     and '83. They only played KC in the playoffs on the way to the '73 
     SB and that was 27-24 in regulation, so I'm not sure what you're 
     talking about.

    
9.3773BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Sep 06 1995 20:536

	I think George got confused.  The double overtime game was against the
	Chargers, wasn't it?

	Kevin
9.3774SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 06 1995 21:0538
RE    <<< Note 9.3772 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!" >>>

>     Miami has been to the SB four times. They did it in '72, '73, '74
>     and '83. They only played KC in the playoffs on the way to the '73 
>     SB and that was 27-24 in regulation, so I'm not sure what you're 
>     talking about.

  Was that the AFC championship game in '73 that they played K.C.? If so
it was on Christmas Day and it was one of the greatest games in NFL history.

  K.C. coached by Hank Stram and Miami coached by Shula were the two best
teams in the AFC and they met in the playoffs on Christmas Day. They were
tied at the end of regulation and started playing overtime periods.

  K.C got into field goal range twice and Rod Stenerew (sp?) the best kicker
in the AFC missed on both attempts. Then somewhere in the 2nd overtime Miami
finally got into field goal range and ... how do you spell this? ... Gerro
Yepremmian? ... You know, the little kicker for Miami that tried to throw
a pass on that famous highlight clip? ... The "pass" that went about 3
feet and got picked off by a line backer?

  Well on this day he was the hero. He kicked the field goal and Miami won
the game by 3 points which would match up with your 27-24 score. It was the
longest playoff game in NFL history when it happened and may still be the
longest game but in my book it was one of the greatest games ever played.

  My point is that this game was obviously won mostly by luck. Three field
goals were kicked by the two best kickers in the AFC and as luck would have it
the 3rd one was good, Miami won the game, and went on to the Superbowl. This
did not mean that Shula was great and Stram was not, they were both great
despite the fact that Stram did not make it to the Super Bowl that year. 

  It is entirely possible for a team to not make it to the Superbowl even
if the coach is great. Or to put it another way, not making it to the
Superbowl does not prove that the coach is not great. It just proves that
his team got beat.

  George
9.3775CAMONE::WAYWe aim by P.F.MThu Sep 07 1995 12:1613
Frank Mendez, part of lack of talent problem on the Giants, is, IMO,
attributable to Dan Reeves.  The other part is attributable to George Young.



George, ask us if we really care about all of that.....

It doesn't really matter what WE think about any of this, and it doesn't
amount to much either.  Bottom line, an NFL owner is going to go out and
try and find the coach that will win him the Super Bowl.....  Nothing else
really matters.

'Saw
9.3776IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Thu Sep 07 1995 12:367
>Bottom line, an NFL owner is going to go out and
>try and find the coach that will win him the Super Bowl.....  Nothing else
>really matters.

Well, there's family, friends, and the love of a wonderful spouse.

Oh - you mean in relation to football...
9.3777SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Sep 07 1995 12:4628
RE              <<< Note 9.3775 by CAMONE::WAY "We aim by P.F.M" >>>

>It doesn't really matter what WE think about any of this, and it doesn't
>amount to much either.  Bottom line, an NFL owner is going to go out and
>try and find the coach that will win him the Super Bowl.....  Nothing else
>really matters.

  Yes we agree on that. But it's entirely possible that the coach who has
the best shot of winning you the Super Bowl is someone who's never won before.

  If you have a choice between

    1). A coach who's had about 5 winning seasons, a track record on building
        contenders out of average teams, and a few close losses in the playoffs
        to other great coaches

OR

    2). A coach who's had 4 miserable seasons even though he had good talent
        but got to the Super Bowl from the 3rd wild card spot his 5th year
        with a couple close upset victories

which one would you take? I know I'd want to go with number 1.

  Or to put it another way, just because you never got to a superbowl doesn't
mean you are not a great coach.

  George
9.3778WMGEN1::abs006p6.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYThu Sep 07 1995 15:251
George, you'rw saying you want Buddy Ryan as your coach???!!!
9.3779match made in hellOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Sep 07 1995 15:411
9.3780MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Thu Sep 07 1995 16:053
    
      George, according to my SI 1995 Sports Almanac the game that
     you describe so vividly never took place.
9.3781SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Sep 07 1995 16:525
  If it never took place, why did you mention it earlier in one of your notes?

  Looks like we both made it up in different places.

  George
9.3782MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Thu Sep 07 1995 17:186
  >> If it never took place, why did you mention it earlier in 
  >> one of your notes?

     I didn't mention it. I told you that I could find no record of it
     and still can't.
    
9.3783SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Sep 07 1995 17:2811
  I have no idea what your book includes and doesn't include but I know the
game was played, I watched it.

  I was a big Miami fan back then and I remember sitting in my inlaws living
room on Christmas day clinging on to my seat through a couple periods of
overtime until Yapremmian made the kick. 

  My inlaws were not exactly the type to put things into the eggnog to make
you dream up games like that.

  George 
9.3784everyone, singalong...SALEM::DODAAsk me about my vow of silenceThu Sep 07 1995 17:428
          <<< Note 9.3779 by OUTSRC::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>
                            -< match made in hell >-

  >  Butty the Hut and Billy Bidwill deserve each other.

  Been through the desert with an owner with no brain....

daryll
9.3785MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Sep 07 1995 20:086
	George is right, the game took place, it was on Christmas Day
	in 1971, Miami beat K.C. is double overtime.  Ed Podolak had the
	greatest day of his career, Jan Stenerud (the AFC pro-bowl kicker
	that year), missed two very makeable field goals, and Miami won
	on the way to its super bowl loss to Dallas.  In my mind one of the
	top three NFL games of all time.
9.3786The reson why KC was my favorite teamBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredThu Sep 07 1995 21:167

	Okay, here's a trivia question.  What college did Ed Podolak attend
	and what position did he play?

	Kevin

9.3787MIMS::ROLLINS_RFri Sep 08 1995 12:246
	Ed Podolak, I was going to mention him.  He probably had the
	greatest game of his life in that playoff game against Miami.

	He was the KC tailback/fullback.  I can't remember where he went 
	to college, though; Kearney State ?  or something along that size,
	as I vaguely recall, probably incorrectly.
9.3788IOWA!!BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredFri Sep 08 1995 14:187

	Ed Podolak played quarterback for the University of Iowa when I was
	a young'un.  He was one of the few bright spots while I was growing up
	in Iowa City.

	Kevin
9.3789need my fixSTRATA::GARRYTue Sep 12 1995 13:434
    Anyone know a web site which updates Sunday games as they are 
    happening?  
    
    Cowboy Tom
9.3790I'll update you, Tommy!CNTROL::SALMONTue Sep 12 1995 13:4911
    Tom:
           You have my home number. You know I'll have my a$$ on the sofa
    all afternoon, every Sunday! Updates become a little more
    unintelligible with the passing of each hour, however.
    
    
                               JS
    
    
    
                              
9.3791CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Sep 18 1995 14:4723
Well, when I went to watch the Pats game yesterday, after seeing the 
Giants stink up the place, I was treated to the KC-Oakland overtime.

Man, I can't believe the final play.  If you caught the replay from behind the
offense, you can see that Hostetler threw the pass on timing, as those passes
usually are).  Brown either ran a poor pattern, or somehow the umpire (I think
it's the umpire who stands in that area) got in the way, and he and Brown
effectively levelled each other.  

By that time the ball was in the air, and Hasty was hastening to the races.


Tough break.

BUT, one has to wonder about the decision NOT to kick the FG two plays before
(prior to the holding call).....


Must've been one of those old-time AFL rivalry type match ups though, from the
sounds of it....


'Saw
9.3792depends on who you talk toHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 18 1995 14:5820
Saw it, Saw.

Tim Brown and the Raiders maintained that the ref was outta position.
Hasty and the Chiefs said that the ref is parta the field and that Brown
was short on the route.

In any case, it's a timing play where Hoss has to put it in the air as
the play is developing. It's no small wonder that this doesn't happen
more often. Sorta reminds me of the real ol' days when they had the
stupid goal posts in the middle of the field and teams used them for
additional blockers.

Yesterday was kinda funny in that a couple of OTs were settle by a TD.
Besides the Chiefs, the Cowboys scored a TD in OT when Emmitt Smith
turned a routing run off tackle into a routine, for him, TD.

Then there was the Elway TD at the very end of the game against the
Redskins to win by 6.

TTom
9.3793CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Sep 18 1995 15:3733
>
>Saw it, Saw.
>
>Tim Brown and the Raiders maintained that the ref was outta position.
>Hasty and the Chiefs said that the ref is parta the field and that Brown
>was short on the route.
>

Yeah.  Someone (ie some talking head, either radio or TV) blamed Hostetler,
and I guess I maintain that he did what he was supposed to do -- dropped back
threw the pass....



>In any case, it's a timing play where Hoss has to put it in the air as
>the play is developing. It's no small wonder that this doesn't happen
>more often. Sorta reminds me of the real ol' days when they had the

Ayuh....



Again though, the Raiders had the chance to put it away and ended up 
tinkering just a bit too much.


And someone, please, tell Al Davis that the beaded glasses chain looks better
on a librarian than a football owner....


'Saw


9.3794CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westMon Sep 18 1995 15:4114
    
    Saw,
    
    While the outcome was unfortunate for this Raiders fan, the decision
    not to kick the field goal was the correct one.  If I recall correctly,
    the ball was on the 32, this is a 49 yard field goal attempt.  Not
    exactly a lock considering that it was 1st down.  Use a couple of
    downs, get 5 more yards and try a 44 yard field goal.  Instead, there
    is a holding penalty, a broken pattern and a returned INT for a TD.  Oh
    well.  At least the call showed me that the Raiders are legitimate this
    year.
    
    Marc
    
9.3795cool!HBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 18 1995 15:416
>And someone, please, tell Al Davis that the beaded glasses chain looks better
>on a librarian than a football owner....

I kinda like it. It adds to the Elvis pampadour do, too.

TTom
9.3796BIGQ::MCKAYMon Sep 18 1995 15:443
    And don't forget Jaeger the kicker is hurt........
    
    Jimbo
9.3797He was good at thatAKOCOA::BREENMon Sep 18 1995 17:142
    If Flutie was in there he would've made the tackle after the
    interception.
9.3798CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Sep 18 1995 17:2815
I thought the ball was closer for some reason.  Perhaps I was confusing it with
the result on the bogus play (holding call).

I wasn't aware that Jaeger was hurt -- I know that Jaecke is hurt in Green
Bay though 8^)


I thought Hoss did a good job getting over there -- and I don't know who it was
but someone almost saved the TD.


Has Brown or the official said anything?  


'Saw
9.3799some perfectionsHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 18 1995 17:3625
Hoss did almost tackle him but committed to a dive and missed the mark.

Rookie Napoleon Kaufman was the guy who almost caught him.

Meanwhile, there are now only a handful of perfect teams.

At 3-0 are Dallas, San Fran - no surprises there - but also Kansas City
led by Sonny Bono instead of Joe Montana and St Louis, as in the
erstwhile LA Rams. The Cowboys looked like they were sleep walking for
most of the game lasted night against the Vikings. The Niners looked to
be in top shape, with or without Neon, as they slapped Bledsoe and the
Pats around. The Chiefs as mentioned beat a good Raiders team, but they
almost always do winning something like 11 of the lasted 12. The Rams
creamed the Panthers.

At 0-3 are both expansion teams - no surpises there - but also NY Giants
whom Dan Reeves hyped as going to go 11-5 for the year and Detriot who
rewarded Wayne Fontes with a contract extension during the off season.
The Giants continued their downward slide by losing at Green Bay while
the Lions fumbled away any chance to beat the Cards.

FWIW, in the interest of entertainment and the like, the Rams are a
perfect 3-0 in the ::POOL while the Giants are a perfect 0-3.

TTom
9.3800Raiders lost because they DESERVED to... ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Sep 18 1995 18:149
    
> Tim Brown and the Raiders maintained that the ref was outta position.
    
    BLAMing an official for being out of position in football 
    has got to be one of the lamest, Hoot-and-Monty-concocted 
    excuses for losing a game ever devised... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
9.3801Monty and the Hootfish?HBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 18 1995 18:434
Just like a lot of close, good games, the team that made the lasted big
play won the game. 'Nuff said, as they say.

TTom
9.3802SNAX::ERICKSONTwo and counting...Mon Sep 18 1995 19:1911
    
    Yup,
    
    	Have to laugh at Tim Brown. Saying that the ref was out of
    position. So Tim does that mean that the play was designed, To pick
    off the DB instead of yourself? :^) It was Brown's responsibility
    to run in front of the ref 1st. Then look for the ball 2nd. Its usually
    a wide open play, because the DB has to go behind the ref of get picked
    like Tim Brown did.
    
    Ron
9.380315K clubHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 18 1995 19:2518
At least he coulda run over that ol' Clemson ref :^).

Also, in that game, Marcus Allen joined a_elite group of 5 who have
gained more than 15,000 all-purpose yards.

The list:

	1. Walter Payton	21,803
	2. Tony Dorsett		16,326
	3. Jim Brown		15,459
	4. Eric Dickerson	15,411
	5. Marcus Allen		15,064

I would think that Brown's per game totals would still be tops and that
no matter how good Dickerson's stats are/were he won't get in the Hall of
Fame.

TTom
9.3804DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Tue Sep 19 1995 15:568
    
     The NFL hs filed a $300 million suit against Jerry Jones for
    usurping the league's current marketing arrangement. Given the
    league's track record in court, I'd say Jerry doesn't have a 
    thing to worry about. The real question is, if and when he wins
    who will follow suit and seek similar marketing arrangements? 
    
    
9.3805MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Sep 19 1995 16:156
	Wonder how long them corporate 'wagon jumpers will be
	around WHEN the Cowboys go down the tubes...



	billl
9.3806SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Sep 19 1995 16:196
  What makes you think the Cowboys will go down the tubes? They went through
a losing period and retained their popularity and now they are winning.

  It would appear that right now things look good for the Cowboys.

  George
9.3807DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Tue Sep 19 1995 16:3813
    
   >> They went through a losing period and retained their popularity 
   
      No they didn't. 10 years ago this Nike deal never would have 
      happened. The Cowboys were so bad they couldn't even sell
      out in football crazy Texas and sales of Cowboys merchandise
      plummeted. And that's really the point. Jerry's just trying 
      to cash in on the turnaround that he and Jimmy Johnson en-
      gineered. If that team takes a downturn and his marketing
      arrangements do likewise then so be it. He's willing to
      succumb to market forces and for that he's a pariah. Go 
      figure.
    
9.3808SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Sep 19 1995 16:428
  Maybe he feels he can remain a contender at worse and a winner at best. He
does have a good track record so far. 

  And if he does fall on hard times he can always sell the team. I've got to
believe that of all the franchise in the 3 major sports the Cowboys would
go for one of the highest prices.

  George
9.3809NOT Jerry !USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Sep 19 1995 16:573
>He does have a good track record so far. 

Jimmy Johnson.
9.3810SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Sep 19 1995 17:1019
  Ok, fill me in on what it is you feel I'm missing here.

  It appears that one of the guys named Johnson bought the Cowboys. He's now
going off on his own with marketing his merchandise.

  It would also appear that

  - As long as he keeps winning he should make money because he doesn't have
    to share his merchandising with the league.

  - If he should forget how to win and tail off a bit he could probably sell
    the team for a profit since many rich people (particularly rich Texans)
    would see the Cowboy's as an attractive team to buy.

  Either way he comes out ahead regardless if his name is Jimmy, Johnny,
Fredrick, or Clarance.

  No?
  George
9.3811Answers to your questionsTNPUBS::NAZZAROI'll make a good Gordon, GordonTue Sep 19 1995 17:2533
    Here's what you are missing:
    
    1) Jerry Jones owns the Cowboys.  He hired Jimmy Johnson to be his
    coach.  Johnson turned around a 1-13 team to a multiple Super Bowl
    winner.  Jones didn't like Johnson getting credit for the Cowboys
    success, so he fired him.
    
    2) Johnson's first year, when the Cowboys only won one game, the
    Cowboys sold less than 3% of the total officially licensed NFL
    merchandise.  Last year, they were responsible for 22%.
    
    3) All NFL teams have signed agreements with NFL properties to share in
    the profits from items marketed by the NFL and sponsored by the NFL. 
    Included in these deals are Coca-Cola.
    
    4) Jones tried to skirt the licensing issue by saying he made a deal
    with Pepsi for Cowboys stadium, which he also owns.  The problem arises
    when he tries to tie in advertising and sales of Pepsi with the Cowboys
    team and not the stadium, since the NFL has an exclusive arrangement
    with Coke, for which Dallas receives its share as an NFL franchise.
    
    5) Jones is continuing to make his own deals in violation of the league
    by-laws, with Nike and soon American Express.  He is the sole recipient
    of the cash from these deals, not the rest of the league.
    
    6) Jones' actions will set up a haves vs have-nots scenario in the NFL
    quite similar to Major League Baseball, which football has tried to
    avoid for many years.
    
    Hope this helps.
    
    NAZZ
    
9.3812I'll bet that somehow Tim McCarver's got his hands in thisEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Sep 19 1995 17:436
    
    There's no right or wrong with this Jerry Jones situation; there 
    are only the lawyers...
    
    glenn
    
9.3813SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Sep 19 1995 17:5423
  NAZ, 

  Thanks for filling that in but I still don't see how all that means that the
Cowboy's are going down the tubes. 

  If I divide 1/30 I get 3.3333% which means that at 3% the Cowboy's were
getting only a fraction of a percentage point below their merchandising share
when they were at their lowest point. If he can keep them at all above that low
point it seems he'll make out better without the league than with them. 

  So it would appear that if he wins in court he'll be better off without the
league except for those times when the team is terrible in which case he'll be
about where he'd be with them, right around 3%. 

  And even if he gets himself into a position without Johnson where he's at that
low point all the time (not very likely) he can still probably sell the team
for a record amount of money. 

  So I still don't see how they are going down the tubes or what Jerry, Jimmy,
Mo, Larry or Curly have to do with anything. This guy Jones is going to make
out like a bandit no matter what he does.

  George
9.3814The myth goes on...AKOCOA::BREENTue Sep 19 1995 18:0428
    I continue to see the perpetuation of the myth that open / free market
    competition is the death nell of the small teams and will ensure that a
    small number of big money teams will dominate.
    
    In baseball prior to drafts, caps, regulation etc the national league
    which aggressively pursued the best baseball players regardless of
    color, had a multiplicity of winners throughout the 50s and 60s.  In
    non-cap free agency both leagues saw franchises rise and fall both big
    and small (put this to verse later) all the while everyone making
    money.
    
    In the nba no repeats until the cap is in place then moribund franchises
    locked in by caps and drafts.  Open market competition, what Jordan and
    Ewing want would be a boon to the league.
    
    In football again the 'Cap and restrictions have resulted in two
    totally dominant teams getting better every year with their success
    creating an environment which overcomes cap limits and furthur
    entrenches this new duopoly.
    
    Nazz, you and Dale Arnold need to get away from your corporate buddies
    and hang with the agents and independent thinking reporters (I'd try
    Bulpett, no I wouldn't sic Andleman on you).  Btw, Jackie McMullan had
    a tremendous interview/article with Patrick in today's Globe.  Must
    reading for any lingering mailman aficionados.
    
    
    
9.3815CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Sep 19 1995 18:126
    
    After watching sunday nite's game all I can say is the Niners can't
    be all that smart if they can let a talent like Charles Haley get
    away. Who did they get in that idiotic trade anyway????????????
    
    mike
9.3816CSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Tue Sep 19 1995 18:516
    Is just the NFL suing Jones or the NFL and the Player Union? According
    to the last CBA the players have the right to X percent of the leagues
    gross revenues including NFL Properties. Is Johnson trying to get around 
    this?
    
    Mike
9.3817sour grapesHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIITue Sep 19 1995 18:5915
Right now it's just the NFL that's suing Jones.

Who gets what outta the properties is a minor mystery in most sports. In
football, there's been several shakeups. A year or so ago, the league
signed some agreement with one of the companies while a handful of stars,
Aikman, Montana, etc., signed on with a comptetitor. Supposedly, the
lasted agreement dealt with this issue.

What is real apparent is that the other owners are just p*ssed off that
they couldn't and/or didn't work some of these deals theyselves. Like
Jones said, almost all the owners have more money than they know what to
do yet very few even owns their own stadium much less have their own
deals.

TTom
9.3818CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Sep 19 1995 19:024
    
    If Jonsesy wins do you think he'll pay Emitt what he deserves???
    If Deon's woth 5 mil a year and troyboy 6 mil then Emitt should
    get 8 or better..........
9.3819CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Sep 19 1995 19:033
    
    then again maybe they ought to give it to o-line who really deserve
    it..........
9.3820the $64M question: how to re-sign EmmittHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIITue Sep 19 1995 19:1332
>    If Jonsesy wins do you think he'll pay Emitt what he deserves???

This, not the NFL, lawsuits or deals, under the table or otherwise, will
be the demise of Jerry Jones and the Cowboys. Emmitt is doing a lot of
talking about how he expects Jones to renegotiate the contract that he
held out for so he could renegotiate.

Emmitt was asked if'n he thought Jones would really follow through and
Emmitt carefully said that this is what Jones said (implying that this is
not necessarily what Jones is going to do.) There's no love loss between
the two of 'em and Aikman can only restructure his contract so many
times.

Signing Emmitt will make the Pepsi deal look like child's play.

>    then again maybe they ought to give it to o-line who really deserve
>    it..........

And another major problem for them 'Boys. Erik Williams blew his knee
against Minnesota and the prognosis has him missing 2-3 weeks, at best.

Part time retiree Derek Kennard is supposedly returning to the team
thised week and there's some talk about maybe moving guard Larry Allen to
tackle. Allen and Kennard got a lot of the finger pointing lasted year on
why Dallas didn't return. Both have looked bad at times.

And of course, they're missing a couple of starters on D, as well. 

And then, ol' Dion will miss some games after baseball goes away for the
winter...

TTom
9.3821The Jones Football League has a nice ring to itTNPUBS::NAZZAROI'll make a good Gordon, GordonTue Sep 19 1995 19:1817
    Re a few back:  I especially liked Patrick's expression of support for
    the people that allow him to get paid $11 million:  "I don't care about
    the fans."  He simply doesn't get it.  There will soon come a point
    when other fans besides me will stop paying to see professional events,
    and the $11 million he receives to play basketball won't be there.  The
    bottom line is that Patrick Ewing is a typical greedy, selfish athlete
    who has been blinded by his own ego and his "advisers" to the truth
    that they are not bigger than the sport they play.
    
    As for Jones, he is clearly in violation of the NFL by-laws.  IMO, if
    he doesn't want to play by the rulews of his league, let him start his
    own league.  
    
    NAZZ
    
    PS - thanks for not making me listen to Mr. rightwing Eddie Anvilhead
    and his "free agency for everyone all the time" nonsense.
9.3822DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Tue Sep 19 1995 19:3317
    
   >> 6) Jones' actions will set up a haves vs have-nots scenario in the NFL
   >> quite similar to Major League Baseball, which football has tried to
   >> avoid for many years.
    
      In baseball in the last ten years, "small market teams" from 
      Minnesota (twice), Oakland, Cincinnatti and Kansas City have 
      managed to win the World Series. In foottball, it's been
      SF, Dallas, Washington, Chicago and New York. Show me where
      the current scheme enhances competition. It doesn't The myth of 
      the haves and have-nots is a big bright red herring. It just ain't
      so. Market size don't make champions, good front offices do.
      That's even more true when you have guaranteed revenue in
      the form of tv contracts and fixed expenses in the form of
      a salary cap. Jerry Jones isn't going to gain any competitive 
      advantage. There's none to be had. What he will gain is a
      big wad of dough.
9.3823CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Sep 19 1995 19:473
    
     I still think he should trade Emitt to the Giants......then we'll see
     if Emitt really is as good as barry Sanders............
9.3824SALEM::DODAAsk me about my vow of silenceTue Sep 19 1995 20:249
This goes even further. After the Nike deal was signed, Jones 
asked Smith, Aikman and a couple other to refrain from wearing 
their Cowboy ball caps on the sidelines because it caused a 
conflict with Nike. The players all have deals with the cap 
manufacturer. 

Guess how far he got with that?

daryll
9.3825DECEAT::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Tue Sep 19 1995 20:4917
   >> Re a few back:  I especially liked Patrick's expression of support for
   >> the people that allow him to get paid $11 million:  "I don't care about
   >> the fans."  

      Talk about your blatant misquotes. What Patrick said in response
      to being told his stance was very unpopular was, "I don't care what 
      the fans think. If I had to do it all over again, I'd do the same 
      thing." Where the hell would we be if folks took an opinion poll 
      before they decided which beliefs to stand up for. Also unmentioned 
      by Nazz is that in the article he also chastised several of the 
      veteran players for trying to deny the young players what they were 
      lucky enough to get. He also said that he'll take any booing he gets 
      in silence. "Too many people turned out to be cowards. You might not 
      have agreed with me, but I believed in something, and I stepped up. 
      There aren't many guys who can say the same thing."
    
9.3826BSS::MENDEZTue Sep 19 1995 20:5412
    I thought Emmitt had a Reebok contract?  It was reported that the
    deal with Nike and Pepsi allowed Jones to give Deion the 13 million
    dollar signing bonus.  On another note... The only way that Dallas
    will not go and win the superbowl is Switzer.  That guy sure seems
    to be without clue.  They have Minnesota down by 7 with 7 minutes to
    play and Dallas comes out throwing.  Here you have arguably the best
    oline, RB, and FB in the game and your throwing the ball???  Moose and
    Emmitt would have kept the ball away from Minnesota at the end...
    Then again maybe thats exactly why Jones hired Switzer... I mean if
    Dallas can win with Switzer then perhaps Jones is the brains behind
    the Cowboys???
    
9.3827help !USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Sep 20 1995 14:365
Last week I found an area on the Web that has a statistician's account
(ie: play-by-play) of each game.  All the stats are there along with
a record of each play run.  I can't remember where I saw it, and can't
find it this week.  Has anyone else seen this ?  I don't see it in
ESPNET of NANDO.
9.3828MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Wed Sep 20 1995 16:1229

      "This attack on NFL Properties is part of the pressure
       for teams to move because if they're going to do their 
       own marketing, then everyone is going to try and move to 
       the best market."

                      _NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue 



       Wake up and smell the Atomic Balm, Paul. The number two
       market in the country, LA, doesn't have an NFL franchise.
       Remember? The Rams bolted for St Louis. That's a better
       market? The Raiders left for Oakland. That's a better market?
       And what town gets mentioned most as a possible destination
       for a franchise on the move? Baltimore. There it sits out
       there on the wrong coast a big fat juicy megalopolis ready
       to be plundered and no one cares because being a big market
       means nothing. The real money is in moving. Ask Irsay. Ask 
       Frontiere. Ask Al Davis. And if that's not an option you
       can always pull the old stick 'em up for a stadium move . 
       Since you can't make any real money from marketing you may 
       as well be in Jacksonvile or Green Bay instead of Los Angeles 
       at least you're guaranteed the gate because there sure as hell
       ain't anything else to do in those burgs.
   

    
9.3829facts, rules, other sports?AKOCOA::BREENThu Sep 21 1995 14:427
    What are the rules for the other sports regarding marketing their own
    merchandise vis a vis nfl style sharing?  It would appear that the
    celtics fe. receive their own revenue not to speak of the Bulls.
    
    To paraphrase you Tommy, it would appear that the nfl is losing out on
    the merchanising pie by doing less marketing which is best done by the
    individual teams.
9.3830MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Thu Sep 21 1995 16:3726
    
  >> To paraphrase you Tommy, it would appear that the nfl is losing out on
  >> the merchanising pie by doing less marketing which is best done by the
  >> individual teams.

     Think of it this way, Wellington Mara chokes to death on his steak 
     tartare at Le Cirque. In order to settle his estate the family sells 
     the Giants. Now the Giants have a great fan base but the city of San 
     Antonio is offering the new owner a discount lease on the Alamo Dome and 
     a pile of tax incentives. Why not move? There's little advantage to 
     the owner to be in the largest market in the country. The only advantage
     that I can see is that the tv contract that everyone shares in will
     be bigger with teams in the largest markets than without but since you
     only get a 1/30th share so what? You may as well be somewhere where 
     the cows outnumber the people if the money is right. Which explains
     why the second biggest market in the country has no team. So when 
     Tagliabue says that letting each team do its own marketing will 
     encourage teams to move to the best markets he's all wet. First of all, 
     shouldn't that be the idea? To have teams in the best markets?  Secondly 
     what does he expect 8 teams in New York where we already have two? A 
     *single* team in Los Angeles where there is NONE? The only thing that 
     keeps teams where they are now is the whim of the owner and the cities'
     willingness to kowtow to those whims. If teams did their own marketing
     would anyone take Bob Kraft seriously if he threatened to move to
     Hartford, Connecticut? I doubt it. 
    
9.3831If we rake the pasture, will they come?AKOCOA::BREENThu Sep 21 1995 18:258
    Well in that case I think Jefferson NH is in line for a new franchise. 
    Last I looked (dusk is a good time) I counted 1300 cows and that's
    without counting the herds in Lancaster.  I'm darned sure there's more
    cows than people and if necessary I can throw in the pigs to make the
    count.
    	In fact we can move them one town over and call them the Lost
    Nation Patriots, a truly appropriate moniker even without Billy leading
    them.
9.3832What next? OJ for NFL CommishOLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyologistThu Sep 21 1995 18:456
    
    
    From the local rag: 
    
    The NFL canceled todays filing of their suit against Jerry Jones and the
    Cowboys. No reason was given.
9.3833SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIThu Sep 21 1995 18:463
  Sounds like a deal is in the making.

  George
9.3834MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Thu Sep 21 1995 19:3711
    
      The NFL didn't cancel the filing of their suit against Jones.
     A hearing to discuss the temporary restraint barring Jones from
     filing any lawsuits of own against the league outside of the
     New York Federal Court was canceled when Jones said he wouldn't
     file suit without advance notice.
    
     
     BTW _ Harvard Law professor Paul Weiler says that Jones wants to
           have his cake and eat it too. But adds that if Jones goes to
           court against the NFL, "He'll win."
9.3835up for suspension?HBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIFri Sep 22 1995 13:379
The potential problem that Jones will face is that if'n he presses the
league, the league has the authority to suspend him.

I know that this is unlikely but ya gotta remember this is a private
club. Baseball set a precedent when they suspended Steinbrenner and Marge
for seasons. I recollect that they couldn't have anything to do with the
club for a year.

TTom
9.3836MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Fri Sep 22 1995 14:1919
 >> The potential problem that Jones will face is that if'n he presses the
 >> league, the league has the authority to suspend him.

 >> I know that this is unlikely but ya gotta remember this is a private
 >> club. Baseball set a precedent when they suspended Steinbrenner and Marge
 >> for seasons. I recollect that they couldn't have anything to do with the
 >> club for a year.

    Not going to happen. Not with a lawsuit already in the works. If they
    tried it, they'd find themselves slapped with a court injunction and
    probably on the losing end of another lawsuit. Marge was suspended for 
    racist comments that were detrimental to the image of baseball. George 
    was suspended for hanging out with gamblers, also detrimental to the image 
    of baseball. Jerry is trying to subvert NFL properties. All he's doing 
    is being greedy. Kind of ironic that the owners, Gordon Gecko discpiples
    all, have no problem with holding up tax payers and entire cities but try 
    and cut their entitlements and they start crying for their rattle.
    
9.3837some good gamesHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 25 1995 14:0122
meanwhile, some good as in interesting games.

The Eagles score the firsted 17 and then watch as the Raiders score the
lasted 48.

Tampa Bay gave Washington about 6 plays from the 2 afore intercepting a
pass in the end zone to save a 14-6 victory.

Both Arizona and Jacksonville scored late TDs to lose by less then some
considered the margin to be. Cowboys beat the Cards 34-20 and the Packers
won 24-14. Close and a couple cigars for them dogs.

The Giants won a battle of oh-fers. The Saints are now ahead in the poll
for who's the worsted team in the league aside from the expansion teams.
Of course, Detroit is still winless going into tonight's game agin the
Niners.

Cleveland won a big conference handing the Chiefs their firsted loss and
San Diego both won pretty big division game ramming Natrone Means down
the Donks' throats.

TTom
9.3838MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Sep 25 1995 16:079
    
       Dragging out the dead horse again...
    
        The biggest 'plaint about Jerry Jones cash grab was that
       it would upset the competitive balance of the league. Has
       there been a week yet with more than one entertaining game
       on tv? Look at next week's schedule. Is there one decent
       game on it? 
       
9.3839some, some notHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 25 1995 16:3814
Entertaining is in the eyes of the beholder.

I make the distinction between good and entertaining so I think that the
the Tampa Bay-Washington game was entertaining. We had that one on at 1.

Then came the San Siego-Denver game and I thought it was good and
entertaining.

Then came the Green Bay-Jacksonville which was neither.

Tonight's not gonna be much to watch, neither. Unless Scott Mitchell
decides to ignore Wayne Fontes and Barry holds onto the ball, and ...

TTom
9.3840KSTREL::MAIEWSKIMon Sep 25 1995 16:5611
  If it's entertainment they want that would be easy. Just have the cheer
leaders on more. Heck, I watched the entire Cowboy game and the most famous
cheerleaders in the country were only on for two quick shots. And this was FOX. 
That seems to be a trend, it's almost as if they deliberately avoid cheer
leaders in NFL games. You see them quite a bit more in college games.

  Oh yeah, the cowboys were out on the field grinding the weekly sacrificial
offering into a gooey sort of mush that oozed off the field after the game. 
It wasn't pretty.

  George
9.3841good is badHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 25 1995 17:068
re; Cheerleaders

The NFL and NBA are trying to market themselves as wholesome, family
value type of entertainment so they've been downplaying cheer leaders
which apparently are a_integral part of what's good in college football
but are unwholesome in the professional game.

TTom
9.3842SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Sep 25 1995 20:357
  No that can't be it. If they were bothered by cheerleaders all they'd have
to do is not allow them on the field in the 1st place.

  But they do seem to go out of their way to avoid them, you see them a lot
more in College games. Maybe it's just coincidence.

  George
9.3843USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Sep 29 1995 16:082
Can someone with the Herald or the Globe post this Sunday's NFL TV
games for the Boston area (please include Providence and NH stations) ?
9.3844For Boston (from Globe)AKOCOA::BREENFri Sep 29 1995 17:425
    Patriots 1pm channel 7 which is nbc
    
    4pm giants - 49s on Fox
    
    8pm jets on tnt
9.3845Another 4pm gameAKOCOA::BREENFri Sep 29 1995 17:431
    Also 4pm 	nbc 	San diego - pitt
9.3846USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Sep 29 1995 18:341
Thanks.
9.3847collective yawnOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Oct 02 1995 18:551
9.3848the curse of KotiteCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Oct 03 1995 16:224
    
    How about those J-E-T-S!!!!!!!!!
    
    mike
9.3849CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Oct 03 1995 17:396
>                            -< the curse of Kotite >-
>
>    
>    How about those J-E-T-S!!!!!!!!!
    
He's almost as bad as Dan Reeves....8^)
9.3850shoulda seen itHBAHBA::HAASarpecay iemdayWed Oct 04 1995 13:029
>    How about those J-E-T-S!!!!!!!!!

All of us who din't pick the Raiders-Jets game as the lock of the week
should be ashamed.

Not quite as ashamed as a team that would pick up Kotite as a coach.
What, was Joe Walton unavailable?

TTom
9.3851OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Oct 04 1995 14:433
9.3852AC was a great one.SALEM::DODAAsk me about my vow of silenceFri Oct 06 1995 15:268
Anthony Carter has retired.

Being a Vikings fan, I can recall some unbelievable catches 
(remember the one when he was flat on his back?) including a 
playoff game against New Orleans a few years ago that 
was unbelievable.

daryll
9.3853WMGEN1::abs003p5.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYMon Oct 09 1995 22:383
He almost singlehandedly prevented the 9ers from winning the SB one year.

brews
9.3854He did it all that dayACIS02::WIERSBECKTue Oct 10 1995 14:044
    1988.  Vikes 36 San Fran 24 in the Stick.  
    
    
    Spud
9.3855What ever happened to this guy?CNTROL::SALMONTue Oct 10 1995 15:351
    Why did he retire? Did he really go downhill that bad? 
9.3856MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Oct 10 1995 16:4912
	If the playoffs began tomorrow, home field advantage in the
	two conferences would belong to:


	Kansas City and St.Louis !

	Playoffs would be Green Bay at Tampa Bay, Atlanta at San Fransisco,
	  with St.Louis, Dallas having byes;
	Indiananapolis at Cleveland, Oakland at Miami, with Kansas City,
	  Buffalo having byes.

	I wonder what people in Missouri are thinking right now ?
9.3857time to recycle the 30-year vetsOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Oct 10 1995 17:305
9.3858SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Oct 10 1995 17:473
  Bring back instant replay.

  George
9.3859MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Oct 10 1995 18:009
	I'd rather see better trained, more competent, officials
	before instant replay.

	Did anyone else ever wonder why if it was "instant" replay
	it always took them so damn long?



	billl
9.3860SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Oct 10 1995 18:057
  Instant replay was a reference to the fact that they don't have to develop a
film. 

  Now if they did that to correct calls you would really see some delays in the
game. 

  George
9.3861OLD1S::CADZILLA2Rocky Mountain IchthyologistTue Oct 10 1995 18:072
    
    The ref's involved in the 12 man screw up were suspended for one game.
9.3862time for a changeOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Oct 10 1995 19:031
9.3863CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Oct 11 1995 12:3111
>	I wonder what people in Missouri are thinking right now ?


My sister-in-law is from Missouri.  Based on that singular experience, how can
you put the words "think" and "Missouri" in the same sentence?


Just kidding folks!  JUST KIDDING.....


'Saw
9.3864Foster signs then quits?HBAHBA::HAASconched outThu Oct 26 1995 17:1517
Did I hear that Barry Foster who signed yesterday with the Cincinnati
Benglas has already quit?

I was travelling and listening to the Sports Babe and they have Geek of
the Week on Wednesday where you nominate notable sportsters for their
stupiditiy, inanity or actions that otherwise indicate what idiots they
are.

For instance, Andre Rison is getting a lot of votes for guaranteeing that
the Browns would beat the Jaguars. Firsted of all, they were favored by
13 so it weren't exactly Joe Willie and the Colts. Then they go out and
lose.

Wail, anyway, Foster got a couple of votes for already stiffing Cincy.
Did this happen?

TTom
9.3865MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 26 1995 17:202
	Supposedly Foster went back in to the Cinci front office, returned
	his signing bonus, and is looking for another job.
9.3866who needs 'imHBAHBA::HAASconched outThu Oct 26 1995 17:3510
Doin' what cause it shore don't look like he's a football player anymore.

As I understand it, they offered him a mil, true?

In any case, I think the Bengals are the better for it. They're starting
to come around and with the way Jeff Blake is throwing and Pickens, Scott
et.al. are catching, their running game is solid enough without bringing
in a bum like Foster.

TTom
9.3867MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonMon Oct 30 1995 11:466
	Right now, it's hard to imagine anyone except Dallas winning the
	Super Bowl.  

	Oakland may be the best contender, but I can't see any NFC team as
	a challenger, and perhaps only Oakland and Cincinnati can score enough
	to keep the Super Bowl interesting for a half.
9.3868MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 08 1995 17:2225
    
  >> Then again, that free market system works just great for the 
  >> players, it's those pesky owners getting all they can that you 
  >> seem to have a problem with.... 

  >> daryll
    
     Nope. I have no problem with a free market system for the owners.
     Quite the opposite. *I'm* all for Jerry Jones getting paid Nike bucks.
     My problem is with spending taxpayer dollars to support something
     as frivolous as the sport of football. Besides revenue sharing isn't
     a 'free market system'. And I would argue that revenue sharing is a 
     large part of what is wrong with the NFL. Personal Seat Licenses, 
     luxury boxes, franchise moves all have two things in common. They're 
     all revenue that the owners of the franchises don't have to share 
     with each other. The other thing they have in common is that in every 
     instance it's the average fan that gets screwed to the wall. There is 
     something seriously wrong with the picture when the second largest 
     market in the country (L.A.) can't support a team or when a city that 
     has provided 30 years of sellouts and unparalleled tv numbers loses 
     its team. Modify much of revenue sharing and the strong football cities 
     like Cleveland and Pittsburg thrive and the places that can't or won't 
     support a team are the ones who watch their teams leave and they prob-
     ably wouldn't care anyways. 
    
9.3869OLD1S::CADZILLA2I packed my John Lee HookerWed Nov 08 1995 17:293
    
    Tommy, I know of a few states were you would be shot at sunrise for
    saying fottball is a frivolous sport.
9.3870MIMS::ROLLINS_RNorthwestern Wildcats BandwagonWed Nov 08 1995 18:1027
>     Nope. I have no problem with a free market system for the owners.
>     Quite the opposite. *I'm* all for Jerry Jones getting paid Nike bucks.
>     My problem is with spending taxpayer dollars to support something
>     as frivolous as the sport of football. 

      Well, it certainly is part of the marketplace - free market economic
      theory certainly allows for local governments to act as an agent for
      the collective common good.  I suppose the question is whether or not
      the agent really is acting on behalf of the people; that needs to be
      decided at the ballot box.  I certainly don't see how one can argue
      that players and unions have the rights they have today, yet deny that
      owners should have the right to do anything they want to their franchises.

      If fans want to organize and have a greater say in things, that's fine,
      but it will never happen.  It's probably the only way to address this
      "problem" that's been described.  I beginning to think I don't see it
      as a real problem in any case.

      Of course, in a real free market, there wouldn't be any league that
      prevents franchises from being added to or removed from the league at
      will.  That could possibly keep the costs down, but would fans maintain
      interest in professional football ?

      Professional sports are oligopolies, and economic theory doesn't project
      any sort of "equitable" or "fair market pricing" results from such
      situations.  In other such types of economies, governments typically
      tend to regulate the industry to achieve such ends.
9.3871Ok who'll give me 50 mil for patriots, I see 50, now 55...AKOCOA::BREENWed Nov 08 1995 18:1610
    I doubt that Cleveland will be without a football team for long.  
    Baltimore showed the country a successful poaching strategy: vote in a
    hefty bounty and then put a time limit on spending it so the game will
    have to make a decision to take the pig on the table or hope the one in
    the poke will come out - yep, they'll take the the first.
    
    Whew, all those metaphors are making me hungry.
    
    Now instead of draft day for college seniors we can have draft day for
    cities and teams.  One big pig auction.
9.3872MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 08 1995 19:2620
    >> I certainly don't see how one can argue that players and unions 
    >> have the rights they have today, yet deny that owners should have 
    >> the right to do anything they want to their franchises.

       Neither do I and I'm not. My point is that there's something wrong
       when the number two market in the country doesn't have a team. And
       there's something wrong when a city that has supported its team the 
       way Cleveland has is about to lose that team. Clearly, something is 
       amiss when Modell even feels the need to move. If you can't make money 
       (and I doubt that he isn't) when you have 30 years of sellouts and 
       the number 1 local tv ratings in the league then something is broke 
       and it needs fixing fast. Either Modell is incompetent or the system 
       sucks or both. The NFL is going about things the wrong way, IMO, by 
       trying to fight these franchise moves. They can't legally do a thing 
       about them. What they need to do is look at the root cause of these 
       moves which, again IMO, is revenue sharing and the mthods used to
       subvert it lke PSLs, luxury boxes, stadium deals, etc. Maybve if 
       Modell was capitalizing off of that tremendous fan support like he
       should have been then the Browns wouldn't be moving.  
    
9.3873ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 08 1995 19:3328
  The problem is that the economics of professional sport is changing. Under
the old system teams went shopping for the biggest market available and moved
their teams to those areas. Moving happened slowly along with things like the
westward expansion of the nation and the industrialization of the South. 

  Now instead of looking for big markets like L.A. owners are looking for
cities where they can get public funding. And it could be anywhere. Maybe some
county in Texas consisting of one big ranch with 6000 permanent residents, five
of whom are a billionaires will cut a deal for a team. 

  Then instead of the Cleveland Browns and the L.A. Rams we'll have the Drydust
Clatons and the Prettygulch Monros. And as sponsors get more involved those
teams will find themselves playing the Rebock Pumps and the Nike Shoe Laces. 

  It should come as no surprise that this is happening now. This was caused by
the leagues over expanding as a result of TV over investing in the 80's. Then
when TV pulled back the TV money got spread so thin that teams just couldn't
make a go under the system that worked in the 60's and 70's with smaller
leagues and more of a TV share per team. (The ancient system under which even
smaller leagues of 12-16 existed without TV has long since been dead.)

  What ever, there's no question we are going through another period of
instability in professional sports as the market and the courts decide what the
new rules will be. Considering just how much money is available it will
eventually all shake out into some new form of stability but that could take a
decade or more before it finally happens. 

  George 
9.3874We may have something here...EDWIN::WAUGAMANIf you're traveling back to GeorgiaWed Nov 08 1995 19:589
>    Tommy, I know of a few states were you would be shot at sunrise for
>    saying fottball is a frivolous sport.
    
    But most of those states and their football could survive quite 
    nicely without the No Fun League.  Including Texas...
    
    glenn
    
9.3875These kind of pure bribes are indefensible...EDWIN::WAUGAMANIf you're traveling back to GeorgiaWed Nov 08 1995 20:0821
    
>      Well, it certainly is part of the marketplace - free market economic
>      theory certainly allows for local governments to act as an agent for
>      the collective common good.  
    
    It's espousing this kind of Keynesian fiscal policy that'll get you 
    kicked out of the Republican Party yet, Rollins-- oh yeah, I forgot, 
    pure capitalistic theory doesn't apply to [insert overdub of John 
    Facenda, voice of God]  THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE.
    
>      Professional sports are oligopolies, and economic theory doesn't project
>      any sort of "equitable" or "fair market pricing" results from such
>      situations.  In other such types of economies, governments typically
>      tend to regulate the industry to achieve such ends.
    
    Governments can and will be corrupted by reptilian creatures like
    Al Davis and Art Modell...
    
    
    glenn
    
9.3876ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 08 1995 20:3330
  Well it's easy to point the finger at the owners going for the big money but
the problem is that the old system just doesn't work any more. The flip side of
what I was saying about there being a new economic system is that the old one
no longer works. 

  When TV over invested the leagues expanded but when TV cut back and stopped
creating stability in these gigantic 30 team leagues everything started coming
apart at the seams. Teams that were more successful finding revenue from
things like merchandise, black mailing cities, etc were able to drive up player
salaries leaving the have nots hurting because the traditional form of revenue,
TV + Box office, was not enough to pay the bills. 

  When TV invests heavily in sports it creates one giant market in which 30
teams can be more or less equal. When TV cuts down and 30 teams all try to
compete at very different revenue levels the only result can be disaster. 

  I see two solutions. Either the NFL and MLB find another sugar daddy like TV
to chip in 10's of billions of dollars or they cut back to a level where the
difference between the haves and have nots is not that great. 

  In baseball it seems to be about 10 teams that can't make it. If they cut
back to 22 or 24 teams and only 2-3 teams were struggling a patch in the dike
like profit sharing would probably even things out. Most likely the NFL is at
about the same level with 10 or so teams asking for handouts when only 2-4
could be supported by league welfare. 

  It's sad but some unless a completely new source of revenue is found, some
teams are going to have to go. I don't see any alternative. 

  George 
9.3877It's getting sickeningCSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Thu Nov 09 1995 11:4713
    What kills me is the same major cities that are tripping over
    themselves to build stadiums, give sweetheart deals to successful
    business men, and generally prostituting themselves to have 10 pro
    football games in their cities with taxpayers money, have let their
    schools and athletic programs go down hill. Gee Baltimore invest 50
    million into your schools AND it's sports program and you'll receive a
    lot more then you'll get back from Modell. St Louis spends 200 million
    to build a Stadium for Ms. Frontiero (sp) and it's innercity is almost
    a war zone. Great. Boston will probably lose the Pats in the next 5
    years to one of these wannabe cities but if it's that the price we'll
    see you later Bob.
    
    Mike
9.3878MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Thu Nov 09 1995 12:088
	re .3877:

	I think that was Tommy's point.  As much as I enjoy 
	watching professional sports, I couldn't agree more.



	billl
9.3879If a business goes under in the real world, no one saves youTNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasThu Nov 09 1995 12:5916
    I am really tired of pro sports owners arguing that theirs is a
    business like any other, and that they are doing what they have to in
    order to survive.
    
    If Modell was really in a business and lost the $21 million over the
    last two seasons he claims to have lost, he would have been out of
    business, and rightfully so.  The Browns should have gone into Chapter
    11 or he would have had to sell the team before they wenty bankrupt. 
    The option to move the team would not exist.  When the local
    departement store in Lowell (Stuart's) lost money for two straight
    years, they went out of business.  It would be grat if sports ran like
    that, so that an incompetent owner like Modell couldn't be saved by a
    financial windfall from another city.  He was incompetent, so he gets
    rewarded with an inredicle sweetheart deal.  Only in America.
    
    NAZZ
9.3880Too lie is to own a football teamAKOCOA::BREENThu Nov 09 1995 13:5018
    Modell said part of the problem was that the Cap had gone up because of
    the luxury box (etc) revenue other teams were getting went into the
    pot.  
    	Has the cap level per team truly gone up that much?  Is the
    difference between his spending and revenues right now that much
    different than five years ago?
    
    	Modell also mentions that he didn't want to counter the Baltimore
    offer with a Cleveland matching offer for ethical reasons - more than
    likely is that the Baltimore deal he was offered would have been
    jeopardized if he had played Baltimore off vs Cleveland and vv. 
    Baltimore officials seem to have been very shrewd during these
    negotiations.
    
    	Finally this business about losing money.  Until the tax returns
    and all financial data connected with "Art Modell Enterprises" can be
    examined the particular cyclical ups and downs of the Cleveland Browns
    business can't be described by "lost 21 mil over two years".
9.3881ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 09 1995 15:2616
  I agree with the idea that it probably makes little sense for tax payers to
pay huge amounts of money for these teams but I disagree with the implication
that Cities like Baltimore are forcing tax payers to cough up this money. 

  Cities like Baltimore consist of tax payers. They are the same people. The
reason the city fathers of Baltimore have their jobs is because their tax
payers voted them in to office. If the tax payers want the money for something
else they should express that feeling on election day. 

  In effect, each group of tax payers, be it city or state, gets to decide for
themselves if they want to spend their money to support a team like the Browns
or put it to better use. We may not agree, but if that's what the people of
Baltimore want and they are willing to pay for it with their taxes then who are
we to say they are wrong? It's their money. 

  George 
9.3882CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Nov 09 1995 15:266
    
    The only reason Modell didn't play the Cleveland vs Baltimore ransom 
    game was because the Cardinals and some other team where lining up at
    the door ready to take Baltimore's money if he didn't move quickly.
    
    mike
9.3883stupid is as stupid doesHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 09 1995 15:5314
>    The only reason Modell didn't play the Cleveland vs Baltimore ransom 
>    game was because the Cardinals and some other team where lining up at
>    the door ready to take Baltimore's money if he didn't move quickly.

Supposedly this is the essence of the urgency that Modell is trying to
claim. But hey Art, wouldn't it be better to keep this little agreement
to yourself until the season is over. I guess, I'm gonna have a
semi-historical memento: a ticket indicating that I've thrown money away
on the Browns winning the Super Bowl thised year.

The nexted home game should be interesting for them Browns, too, also,
yet.

TTom
9.3884What Game Was It???LUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Nov 09 1995 15:5932
    re: .3763
    
    I just read this reply.
    
    George, you said you'd "never forget" the NFC championship game between
    the Browns and Packers in the snow and won by the Packers by a field 
    goal that to this day no one really knows if it was good.
    
    Being a Packer fan, I'm really interested in this.
    
    First of all, there was no NFC until the merger between the two leagues
    and since that time, the Packers and Browns never met in a playoff
    game.  Secondly, if they did, it could not be an NFC championship
    game as Cleveland is in the AFC.  They would have to meet in the 
    Super Bowl.
    
    Third, the Packers and Browns played in only one NFL championship
    game and the game was in 1965.  The Packers won handily and I am pretty
    sure there was no snow.
    
    I am curious...might it have been the 1965 playoff game between the
    Colts and the Packers?  They played because they had identical records.
    The game went into OT after Don Chandler made a game tying field goal.
    This field goal was highly questioned.  (My dad told me it was no
    good.)   The game winning FG was not in doubt, however, had Chandler
    missed the one before the end of regulation, I don't think the Packers
    had much if any chance to win.
    
    Anyway, were you referring to that game?
    
    							Tony
    
9.3885~/~HBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 09 1995 16:046
re: Browns vs Packers for NFC championship

Let's see, this is Cleveland so it's prolly more a case of a Groaner-fack
that a Heiser filter.

TTom
9.3886SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 09 1995 16:1929
  Are you sure there was no NFC before the merger? I thought that for a few
years before the merger the NFL was divided into 4 division, the NFC East,
NFC West, AFC East, and AFC West.

  As I recall when they did the merger the new division were more or less
made up from the old ones with a few teams moving around something like:

    Old Way               New Way
    -------               -------
   NFL NFC East          NFL NFC East
   NFL NFC West          NFL NFC East
   NFL AFC East          NFL AFC Central
   NFL AFC West          NFL NFC Central
   AFL East              NFL AFC East
   AFL West              NFL AFC West

  This could be off a bit it's been a long time but I think it went something
like that.

  Anyway the thing I was trying to say there is that I remember watching a game
around that time and either Chandler or Groza kicking it away into the snow and
a big controversy resulting because no one could agree if it should have been
good or not from watching the film. 

  The thing I'll "never forget" is that the game turned on a kick in bad
weather that was very close, hence in some cases luck does have a lot to do
with who wins a championship.

  George 
9.3887common groundHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboThu Nov 09 1995 16:2414
>  This could be off a bit it's been a long time but I think it went something
>like that.

I think we found something we can agree on ;-).

Like it's been said afore, there weren't no AFC/NFC afore the merger.
Just the AFL and NFL.

The most memorable Browns playoff game fer me was the ice bowl against
the Raiders where Brian Sipe[s] threw one too many passes and coughed up
a_interception when all they needed was a FG. The Raiders went on to win
it all, I believe.

TTom
9.3888ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 09 1995 16:4321
RE              <<< Note 9.3887 by HBAHBA::HAAS "graffiti limbo" >>>

>Like it's been said afore, there weren't no AFC/NFC afore the merger.
>Just the AFL and NFL.

  Do you disagree about the NFL being divided into 4 divisions before the
merger? If so, how were they organized?

  I seem to remember that before the early 60s they had two groups of teams
that were called either Eastern/Western Conference or National/American
conference.

  Then I think that around 1960 the National and American Conferences were
divided up into two divisions each with the NFL playoffs consisting of one
round of Conference championship games between the division winners and an NFL
championship game the next week. 

  Are you saying that is wrong? If so, then how was the NFL structured before
the merger and what did the playoffs look like?

  George
9.3889MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 09 1995 16:462
    
     It was Eastern and Western conferences.
9.3890My Best Guess...LUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Nov 09 1995 16:5922
      George,
    
        It was the NFL.
    
        Before 1967, there were the western and eastern divisions.
    
        In 1967, there was a further division.  The west split into
        the Coastal (Colts/Rams/Falcons/49'ers) and the Central (Packers/
        Vikings/Lions/Bears).
    
        The east split into the Century and the Capital.  I forget the
        makeup of these, but I know the Browns and Cowboys were in
        separate divisions as they often met each other for the eastern
        crown.  My guess is: Capital (Cowboys/Redskins/Eagles/Giants)
        and Century (Browns/Cardinals/Steelers/Saints).
    
        The eastern part is much guessing and I know the Saints had to
        be in there.  I'd be curious as to the actual makeup of the league
        (NFL) in '67.
    
    							Tony
                                                            
9.3891AKOCOA::BREENThu Nov 09 1995 17:0915
    George,
    	They put in this think in the 60s called the wild card bowl which
    was played between the runner-ups but had no particular meaning but the
    winner may have collected some change.  I'm sure the Browns must have
    made it and perhaps so did the Packers (Colts for sure because I
    remember Matte playing in one of them).  It only existed for a few
    years.
    
    	The Browns did have at least one Eastern division playoff with the
    Giants and maybe more (perhaps a final game of regular season with the
    two tied).  The Browns were also on tv in those days so neighborhoods
    were divided between Giant fans and Brown fans.
    
    	Who did the Colts beat from the East prior to losing to Joe Willie
    and the Jets in SuperBowl III?
9.3892ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 09 1995 17:1812
  Ok so we're all goofed up.

  Tommy says before the merger the NFL was divided into the Eastern and Western
Conference, Tony says Eastern and Western Division divided further into named
divisions. I remember Eastern and Western Conference up to a point, then
National and American Conference, then National and American conference each
divided into Eastern and Western divisions. 

  Maybe we should look it up then award a big bowl of spinach to the winner.
Not very glamorous but it would be healthy. 

  George 
9.3893More...STRATA::BARBIERIThu Nov 09 1995 17:4210
      re: -1
    
      George,
    
        It was eastern and western conferences and then divided into
        coastal and central divisions and capital and century divisions.
    
        The Colts blasted the Browns en route to SB III.
    
    							Tony
9.3894My cut at it....CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearThu Nov 09 1995 17:4386
At one point in time I had it all down.

I can verify this this evening, but here's the way I have it.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=
From 1950-1952, the league was aligned into 2 conferences, American
and ?????, when the AAFC merged with the NFL.

	In the American conference:
	GIANTS
	PITTSBURGH
	CLEVELAND
	WASHINGTON
	CHICAGO CARDINALS
	PHILADELPHIA

	In the "other" conference
	BALTIMORE
	NY YANKEES
	CHICAGO BEARS
	DALLAS
	GREEN BAY




In 1953 - re-alignment occured again:
	Eastern			Western
	GIANTS			BALTIMORE(FROM DALLAS)
	PITTSBURGH		LA RAMS
	WASHINGTON		DETROIT
	CHICAGO CARDINALS	GREEN BAY
	CLEVELAND		SAN FRANCISCO
	PHILADELPHIA		CHICAGO BEARS

1960 - Dallas joins the east, Minnesota joins the west
	East			West

	NY Giants		Green Bay Packers
	Pittsburgh		Baltimore
	Washington		Chicago
	Philly			LA Rams
	Dallas			San Fran
	Cleveland		Detroit
	St Louis		Minnesota

1961 - Schedule expand to 14 games

1967 - More Expansion - Atlanta and New Orleans

In 1967, they went to the four division format (Capitol, Century, Central,
Coastal)

    Century Division 	Capitol		Central		Coastal

	GIANTS		Baltimore	Green Bay	LA
	St. Louis	Philadelphia	Minnesota	San Francisco
	Cleveland	Washington	Chicago		Atlanta
	Pittsburgh	Dallas		Detroit		New Orleans

1968 - Dallas and St. Louis swap divisions

1970 - AFC/NFC merger Colts, Browns, and Steelers go to AFC

	NFC East	NFC Central	NFC West
			
	GIANTS		Green Bay	LA
	St. Louis	Minnesota	San Francisco
	Dallas		Chicago		Atlanta
	Philadelphia	Detroit		New Orleans
	Washington

	AFC East	AFC Central	AFC West

	Buffalo		Cleveland	Oakland
	New England	Pittsburgh	San Diego
	Miami		Cincinatti	Denver
	NY Jets		Houston		Kansas City
	Baltimore
	
1976 - Expansion - Seattle added to AFC West, Tampa Bay to NFC Central

1993 - Expansion added Charlotte (NC) Panthers and Jacksonville (FLA)
       Jaguars, to start play in 1995.  


9.38951965?ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsThu Nov 09 1995 17:4914
    From various searches off of the SI page on da net - 
    
    1965
    
    AFL Championship - Buffalo 20
                       SD       7
    
    NFL Western Conference Chanpionship Game - Green Bay 13
                                               Baltimore 10
    
    NFL Championship - Green Bay 23
                       Cleve     12
    
    UMDan
9.3896Correction: Colts in Coastal in 1967STRATA::BARBIERIThu Nov 09 1995 18:2033
    re: .3894
    
    Excellent memory, but I know of one correction...
    
    In 1967, the Colts were definitely in the Coastal.  I remember
    this vividly as the final Colt game was at the Coliseum against
    the Rams.  Colts came in at 11-0-2 and Rams were 10-1-2 (each
    team had two ties).   (I know my 9 year old memory serves me
    correct!  :-)
    
    Rams demolished the Colts 34-7 to win the Coastal division.
    
    They had to face the Pack in the playoffs and most 'experts'
    favored the Rams as they felt the Pack was too old and the Rams
    too awesome.
    
    Packers 28 Rams 7.  Good bye Rams!
    
    Then on to the famed Ice Bowl.
    
    Anyway, the Colts/Rams matchup was for the Coastal title.
    
    The thing that strikes me as very weird is that this all then
    requires that the Saints were in the eastern division for a
    time.  As I know the Central and Coastal makeups.
    
    I even checked to count up 16 NFL teams wondering if maybe the
    Saints weren't a team yet by '67.  Without them, you only had
    15 teams, so they were a team and they had to be in the eastern
    division.
    
    						Tony
                 
9.3897ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Nov 09 1995 18:2117
RE                      <<< Note 9.3891 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    	They put in this thing in the 60s called the wild card bowl which
>    was played between the runner-ups but had no particular meaning but the
>    winner may have collected some change.  

  I remember those games. There were two weeks of playoffs with the Conference
Championships one week and the NFL championship game and that consolation game
the next. 

  The announcers use to say that the consolation game was very unpopular with
the players because it didn't mean anything but the big advantage to the fans
was that there was a 2nd game to watch on the weekend they held the
championship game. A 2nd game is what is badly missing from Superbowl Sunday,
hence things like battling beer bottles. 

  George
9.3898I'll fix it on Monday...CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Nov 10 1995 11:3928
>    Packers 28 Rams 7.  Good bye Rams!
>    
>    Then on to the famed Ice Bowl.
>    
>    Anyway, the Colts/Rams matchup was for the Coastal title.
>    
>    The thing that strikes me as very weird is that this all then
>    requires that the Saints were in the eastern division for a
>    time.  As I know the Central and Coastal makeups.
>    
>    I even checked to count up 16 NFL teams wondering if maybe the
>    Saints weren't a team yet by '67.  Without them, you only had
>    15 teams, so they were a team and they had to be in the eastern
>    division.
    

Tony, I didn't get a chance to check last night but I will over the weekend.
The damn book was sitting right in the book case, but I had other things to
take care of 8^)


I know that in 1960, or 1961, teams had bye-weeks, because of an uneven number
of teams to play against.  I forgot to mention that....

Yes, Nawlins was a team in 1967....I'm pretty sure....


'Saw
9.3899ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Nov 10 1995 11:504
  Weren't the saints the one where the fans took to wearing the bags over their
heads?

  George
9.3900CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Nov 10 1995 11:567
>  Weren't the saints the one where the fans took to wearing the bags over their
>heads?
>
>  George

Yes, they ultimately did....

9.3901whither goeth the Browns?HBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboTue Nov 14 1995 13:3724
Wail, pretty much like their owner the Browns pretty much didn't show up.

Firsted of all, all the hoopla about protests and such went for nothin. I
wasn't at the game but what happened to the 30K orange ribbons and
banners? Or did Modell just put the fix in with ABC to not show any of
it?

In any case, the Browns started out seemingly slow. But they were saving
themselves for the second half wherein they gained a grand total of 10,
count 'em 10, total yards and no 1st downs. 

For their part the Steelers tried to keep 'em in the game scoring a
meager 7 points by half theyselves. Then the running by Peggram, the
passing to Thigpen and the overall effort of the defense stepped up and
totally stopped the Browns.

The hero of the night had to be Kordell Stewart who did about everything
to spark the team when they needed it. Although he threw a TD and gained
1st downs by running, thowing and optioning, the play that really made a
statement was going over the middle to catch a pass and taking a major
hit. Stewart popped up like nothing happened and headed back to the
huddle to see which of about 11 positions he'd play the nexted down.

TTom
9.3902gotta love that option play!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Nov 14 1995 14:0410
	I was disappointed when our local HS QB wasn't
	playing much when he went out to CU.  After seeing
	Stewart's abilities, I can see why.

	He's one heck of a 4th string QB.  Look for him to
	take over the reins in a year or two.



	billl
9.3903others wish they had injuriesHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboTue Nov 14 1995 15:4923
It's walkin wounded time again for NFL QBs.

Here's the current hit parade:

John Elway, Denver - concussion in Eagles game; listed as questionable; 
	Bill Musgrave listed ahead of Hugh Millen.

Chris Chandler, Houston - bruised nerve in leg from Bengals game;
	expected to start.

Jim Harbaugh, Indianapolis - groin (previous injury); expected to start.

Jeff Hostetler, Oakland - injured shoulder in Giants game; expected to 
	start.

Troy Aikman, Dallas - injured knee in Niners game; listsed as 
	questionable; Jason Garrett expected to start (backup Wade
	Wilson has a sprained right thumb and a cut left hand).

Steve Young, San Francisco - had shoulder scoped; listed as out for 3-4
	weeks; Elvis Grbac will start.

TTom
9.3904Would be a milestoneAKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 14 1995 16:447
    Ttom and I were arguing about whether Miami will be favored over San
    Fran sans Young.  We determined that since Dallas and San Fran became
    "the big 2" neither has been a dog to the afc.
    
    And I say even with Elvis that San Fran (and Dallas for that matter)
    will continue their string of not being an underdog to afc (since first
    Dallas Superbowl win)
9.3905never on mondayHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboTue Nov 14 1995 16:4810
And I say that a healthy Dan Marino will be favored at home against a guy
named Elvis even if'n it's the Niners. Pick 'em at the worsted.

In the lasted 4 years, San Fran has been the dog a grand total of 4
times. Once to the Giants, once to the Saints and recently twice to the
Cowboys. And as billte said, never to the AFC.

A friendly wager has ensued...

TTom
9.3906GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Tue Nov 14 1995 17:185
    
    	Elway is questionable due to an aching biceps tendon (throwing
    	wing).  
    
    Claybone
9.3907cookedHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboTue Nov 14 1995 17:2110
>    	Elway is questionable due to an aching biceps tendon (throwing
>    	wing).  

There's a joke in there somewhere right? ;-).

From what I saw of the replays, a couple of rather large Iggles
sandwiched him giving him that warm, glazed look that is popular at this
time of year.

TTom 
9.3908AKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 14 1995 17:432
    Did Mike Mamula play for Eagles - didn't hear his name prior Monday
    either
9.3909rumblin stumblinHBAHBA::HAASgraffiti limboTue Nov 14 1995 17:474
yeah, he played well, recovering a fumble in the 4th quarter to set up a
Ricky Watters TD.

TTom
9.3910CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Nov 14 1995 17:524
He...could...go...all....the....way.......NAH!


Nice pickup though...
9.3911Dude is a monstaAD::HEATHRelax its only October they got timeTue Nov 14 1995 18:045
    
    
    Mamula was one of the ones that clobbered Smellway if I remember right.
    
    Jerry
9.3912CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Nov 14 1995 18:485
    
    as usual when the Donks start to fold Elway takes a powder to avoid
    being blame............looks like he taught the move to Aikman...
    
    mike
9.3913GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Tue Nov 14 1995 19:016
    
    	Nice yank there MikeyC.  Elway bit it at the start of the 2cd qtr.
    	Mamula and somebody else sandwiched him thus allowing him a tour
    	of the stars.  On the same play, he injured his throwing arm.
    
    Claybone
9.3914Still WonderingLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Nov 17 1995 11:148
      I'm still curious about what the exact NFL alignment was in the
      late 60's/early 70's.
    
      Cam, did you find out?  I'm especially wondering where the Saints
      were and what the make-up of the Century and Capital divisions 
      were.
    
    						Ton
9.3915CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Nov 17 1995 11:4010
Oh yeah, that's right.  


THAT'S what I've been forgetting to do....  I'll try to remember to get the
book out over the weekend and write it down.

I've been doing research on other stuff and I'd forgotten about this one....


'Saw
9.3916ThanksLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Nov 17 1995 15:177
      'Saw,
    
         Thanks...and excuse me for calling you 'Cam'!!
    
         (some kind of a mental slip)
    
    					Tony
9.3917CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Nov 17 1995 15:3417
>
>      'Saw,
>    
>         Thanks...and excuse me for calling you 'Cam'!!
>    
>         (some kind of a mental slip)
>    
>    					Tony
>

Tony, 

Don't sweat it.  I've been called MUCH worse, and I don't mind being called 
Cam, at any rate.

I'll try to remind myself to look in the book tonight or over the weekend....

9.3918Here's the answers....CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Nov 20 1995 11:44165
You asked for it, here it is, from the Football Encyclopedia.


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Here's what I found.....  All divisions in alphabetical order.


1960

	Eastern Conference		Western Conference
	------------------		------------------

	Cleveland Browns		Baltimore Colts
	New York Giants			Chicago Bears
	Philadelphia Eagles		Dallas Cowboys   *
	Pittsburgh Steelers		Detroit Lions
	St. Louis Cardinals		Green Bay Packers
	Washington Redskins		Los Angeles Ram
					San Francisco 49ers
Note:

	Dallas Cowboys were an expansion team, first year in the league.
	St. Louis Cardinals had just moved from Chicago.
	Teams played 14 games, but had a bye week due to the unbalanced
	leagues


1961-1965

	Eastern Conference		Western Conference
	------------------		------------------

	Cleveland Browns		Baltimore Colts
	Dallas Cowboys			Chicago Bears
	New York Giants		       	Detroit Lions
	Philadelphia Eagles		Green Bay Packers
	Pittsburgh Steelers		Los Angeles Rams
	St. Louis Cardinals		Minnesota Vikings  *
	Washington Redskins		San Francisco 49ers

Note:

	Minnesota added in 1961, and Dallas moved to Eastern Conference.
	Bye week went away.


1966

	Eastern Conference		Western Conference
	------------------		------------------
	Atlanta Falcons   *		Baltimore Colts
	Cleveland Browns		Chicago Bears
	Dallas Cowboys                  Detroit Lions
	New York Giants			Green Bay Packers
	Philadelphia Eagles		Los Angeles Rams
        Pittsburgh Steelers		Minnesota Vikings
	St. Louis Cardinals		San Francisco 49ers
	Washington Redskins


Note:
	Atlanta Falcons were added.


1967

			Eastern Conference
	Capitol Division		Century Division
        ----------------		----------------

	Dallas Cowboys			Cleveland Browns
	New Orleans Saints *		New York Giants
	Philadelphia Eagles		Pittsburgh Steelers
	Washington Redskins		St. Louis Cardinals


			Western Conference
	Central Division		Coastal Division
        ----------------		----------------

	Chicago Bears			Atlanta Falcons
	Detroit Lions			Baltimore Colts
	Green Bay Packers		Los Angeles Rams
	Minnesota Vikings		San Francisco 49ers


Note:

	New Orleans Saints were added.  League broken into four divisions
	in two conferences.



1968

			Eastern Conference
	Capitol Division		Century Division
        ----------------		----------------

	Dallas Cowboys			Cleveland Browns
	New York Giants     		New Orleans Saints	
	Philadelphia Eagles		Pittsburgh Steelers
	Washington Redskins		St. Louis Cardinals


			Western Conference
	Central Division		Coastal Division
        ----------------		----------------

	Chicago Bears			Atlanta Falcons
	Detroit Lions			Baltimore Colts
	Green Bay Packers		Los Angeles Rams
	Minnesota Vikings		San Francisco 49ers


Note:

	New York Giants and New Orleans Saints switched divisions.



1969

			Eastern Conference
	Capitol Division		Century Division
        ----------------		----------------

	Dallas Cowboys			Cleveland Browns
	New Orleans Saints  		New York Giants
	Philadelphia Eagles		Pittsburgh Steelers
	Washington Redskins		St. Louis Cardinals


			Western Conference
	Central Division		Coastal Division
        ----------------		----------------

	Chicago Bears			Atlanta Falcons
	Detroit Lions			Baltimore Colts
	Green Bay Packers		Los Angeles Rams
	Minnesota Vikings		San Francisco 49ers


Note:

	New York Giants and New Orleans Saints switched divisions again.




In 1970, the leagues (NFL, AFL) merged, and formed the two conference, three
division format that exists today.

In 1971, the Boston Patriots (AFC East) became the New England Patriots.

In 1976, the Seattle Seahawks were added to the NFC West, and the Tampa Bay
Buccaneers to the AFC West.

In 1977, Seattle was moved to the AFC West and Tampa Bay to the NFC Central.



That brings us up to the lastest expansion.

9.3919NFL screws Mamula; will probably put hit on nfl filmsAKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 21 1995 17:0012
    I'm peeved about Mike Mamula getting that big fine last week and now
    injured (not related, just a double whammy).  I saw the film and it
    looked like he was coming in with his shoulder to Elway's body and
    Elway ducked and the hit was shoulder(Mamula) to helmet.
    
    I now have the impression that the NFL is using these fines as a form
    of advertisement for the product - where else can they make newspapers
    to market the violence of the game so cheaply.
    
    It's like McDonalds and that phony coffee spill case where they got all
    that free advertising for Mac's "steaming hot coffee" for what finally
    was reduced two a few hundred thou.
9.3920USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Nov 21 1995 18:4918
>    I'm peeved about Mike Mamula getting that big fine last week and now
>    injured (not related, just a double whammy).  I saw the film and it
>    looked like he was coming in with his shoulder to Elway's body and
>    Elway ducked and the hit was shoulder(Mamula) to helmet.

Every shot I saw of the hit (and I saw it live too), had Mamula's helmet
on Elway's helmet.  Whether Elway ducked into it isn't the point...it's
that Mamula was leading with his helmet.

I think it's great that they're nailing these guys.  The fines should be
even bigger, IMO.  And let's start with the, "why don't they put dresses
on these guys" comments now.  The big, brave DLs and LBs love to bring
that up, yet I haven't seen any standing there looking downfield while
250 lb guys are coming at 'em full-speed.

One analyst hit it on the head when he noted that Young, Aikman, Elway
and Favre were either out or went down on the same Sunday.  These are
the guys the fans want to see.
9.3921happy to obligeMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Tue Nov 21 1995 18:564
"why don't they put dresses on these guys"


billl
9.3922some ratingsCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Nov 21 1995 19:088
    
    Billte if you can get me Mamula's address I'll be happy to throw in
    a few bucks towards the fine.........
    
    Dresswearers: Elway, Aikman, Moon, Brown, Bledsoe, Marino, Hoss,
    Randall, George
    
    Hemen: Favre, Blake, Young, Kelly, Humphries, Brunell, O'Donnell  
9.3923Went for the body, but Elway duckedILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersTue Nov 21 1995 19:1014
	I don't think there was anything wrong with the hit Mamula
	put on Elway ... and neither did the refs, no penalty was
	called on the play ... Elway just had the misfortune of getting
	caught in a "lineman sandwhich" ... if Elway didn't leave 
	the game with an injury then the play would have been quickly 
	forgotten ... if anyone should be fined for that play it should
	be the offensive line for poor pass protection :-) ...

	On the other hand, I thought the hit that the Miami safety (not
	Oliver, the one who lost his starting job) laid on Brent Jones 
	in the Monday Night Football game bordered on cheap shot ... he 
	blindsided Jones and led with his helmet ...

	Vinny
9.3924Well it's 2 - 1 right now, anyone else?AKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 21 1995 19:1012
    Well I'm probably biased but the film I saw had Mamula coming in with
    his shoulder and Elway ducked down and in to him resulting in whatever
    helmet activity there was.  If Elway hadn't been moving out of the way
    of the guy coming from the right side then Mamula would have simply
    made a normal tackle - from what I've seen.
    
    Anybody as "suspicious" as I am about NFL true motives?  Since Joe sees
    the same film with a different conclusion perhaps the NFL wasn't trying
    to come up with their weekly quota of "hits".  To show its sincerity I
    expect NFL properties to immediately discontinue the sale of videos
    depicting major hits on qbs and deleting same from the weekly feeds to
    ESPN.
9.3925CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Nov 21 1995 19:2211
    
    let me see if I understand this right Billte, what you're saying is
    he'll get fined caused  he hit a prima donna but if he hit a bum
    like Dave Brown nothing would be said? Speaking of Miami, one of em
    layed a cheapshot Elvis too....
    
    does anyone know why Brian Cox was so hot at his teammates after
    getting burnt and who Merton Hanks wasd after?
    
    Do you think if Miami continues to slide Shula will be asked to step
    aside???????
9.3926AKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 21 1995 19:317
    No I'm just saying that if the NFL is going to fine someone it should
    be on a play with a lot less doubt than the Mamula one.  Definetly I'd
    say the "logic" was "Elway hurt, who can we fine?  Rookie involved?
    That's enough for me".
    
    Now Mamula is getting millions but what happens if a 175k player makes
    a hard, clean hit?
9.3927By your standards no conspiracy here, billte ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANNever make it up to Coeur D'AleneTue Nov 21 1995 19:3810
    
>        Anybody as "suspicious" as I am about NFL true motives?
    
    What suspicion?  The NFL featured Chuck Cecil on its "Quarterback
    Kills" video last year.  Hell yes, your Dave Browns are considered
    strictly stand-in material...
    
    
    glenn
     
9.3928SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Tue Nov 21 1995 19:477
    
    	Needless to say none of us know. If Mamula was warned earlier in
    the year for leading with his head. Most of the time players don't
    get fined. For an incendent in which there is no prior history.
    
    
    Ron
9.3929BIGQ::MCKAYWed Nov 22 1995 09:156
    Mamula's hit was fine.  Elway moved right into it.  Head is connected
    to the shoulder and will be part of every stick made.  Most
    spears are shoulder tackles where the ballcarrier moves right into
    the helmet path.
    
    Jimbo
9.3930GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Wed Nov 22 1995 09:199
    But Mamula DIDN'T lead with his head!!!!
    
    Like most of us, Mamula does have a head and it needs to be attached to
    his shoulders when he makes a tackle. He would have hit Elway in the
    ribs IF Fuller hadn't hit Elway a split second earlier and knocked him
    down a bit. The fine is garbage and is being appealled. Anyone who has
    seen the hit knows the fine is trash.
    
    
9.3931CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Nov 22 1995 11:5013
I've seen the film clip a couple of times.

Bullshit, pure and simple.

If it was Dave Brown, Tommy Maddox"Sux", Eric Kramer, Jim Everett or one of
those ilk, it would never have happened.   But because it's Mr. Ed, the pansy
league fines Mamula.

The league should put dresses on these guys.  (That's for whomever asked for it
to be said)


'Saw
9.3932OLD1S::CADZILLA2Running down a dreamWed Nov 22 1995 13:3516
    
    
    re 3922.
    
     I'd like to see you take a hit blindside from some 290 lb Def. End and 
    get up. They have made rule to protect the players. If a player leads with 
    this head (aka spearing) he should be fined no matter who the other player 
    happens to be.
    
    Lambert's dress wearing joke was funny at one time. I do not see the
    humor myself. Having played QB and gotten my bell rung a time or two
    it is not easy standing there trying to pass with all these apes
    zeroing in on you knowing your going to get creamed in two or three
    seconds. 
    
     
9.3933But then I like fights in hockey games too....CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Nov 22 1995 13:4523
>    
>    Lambert's dress wearing joke was funny at one time. I do not see the
>    humor myself. Having played QB and gotten my bell rung a time or two
>    it is not easy standing there trying to pass with all these apes
>    zeroing in on you knowing your going to get creamed in two or three
>    seconds. 
>    


If it was easy, we'd all be doing it, and these guys wouldn't be getting paid
mondo bucks to do it.

They know what they are getting into.  YA Tittle, Bart Starr, Sonny Jurgenson, 
Milt Plum, Sammy Baugh, et al, Fran Tarkenton, all were real men who played the
position -- hell, Fran scrambled to get away from it...


With that said, to me, a blatant intent to injure deserves a fine.  Mamula was
NOT blatantly attempting to injure....

JMHO,
'Saw     

9.3934They oughta just outlaw helmets!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Nov 22 1995 14:0513
>    I'd like to see you take a hit blindside from some 290 lb 
>    Def. End and get up. 

	'Saw kinda hit the ol' nail on the head (no pun intended).
	You give me a multi-million dollar contract and you'd be
	suprised what physical harm I'd subject myself to.

	We're not talking about over 40 computer geeks working
	for peanuts here, going up against the likes of LT.



	billl
9.3935OLD1S::CADZILLA2Running down a dreamWed Nov 22 1995 14:086
    
    There not being paid mondo bucks to be speared by a defensive player 
    out to put them out of the game. Don't give me that bs he was not out
    to hurt anyone either. Defensive players are paid to hurt the offense 
    and knock the offense's players out of the game.  How many players on
    offense are getting fined?
9.3936CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Nov 22 1995 14:1225
>    
>    There not being paid mondo bucks to be speared by a defensive player 
>    out to put them out of the game. Don't give me that bs he was not out
>    to hurt anyone either. Defensive players are paid to hurt the offense 
>    and knock the offense's players out of the game.  How many players on
>    offense are getting fined?
>

They being paid the big bucks to play football.  That includes all that is
inherent to the game.

The ONLY reason the NFL is protecting quarterbacks is because the QBs are a
draw, and if Aikman, Elway, Young and Farve aren't in the game, the ratings
will go down.

Before ratings became important they weren't protecting real men, like the
aformentioned QBs I listed....

Offense doens't get fined because they're not in the spotlight.  I saw just as
many incidents this past weekend of offensive intent to injure with chop blocks
and leg whips, but they don't fined because those offenses are not
perpetrated on spotlight players.....

'Saw

9.3937OLD1S::CADZILLA2Running down a dreamWed Nov 22 1995 14:234
    
    
    Spearing a player no matter what position he plays is not part of the
    game. 
9.3938put a dress on em'CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Nov 22 1995 16:466
    
    Sure could have fooled me the number of guys that do it. I also agree
    with Saw that the chop-blocking is alot worst, alot more prevalaint 
    but totally ignored cause the players aren't primma donnas......
    
    mike
9.3939MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Nov 22 1995 17:168
	Problem is that it seems to be just you, and whoever
	levied the fine, consider it an intentional spear.

	Everyone else appears to view it as a clean hit.



	billl
9.3940Browns=BengalsFABSIX::J_PAGEWed Nov 22 1995 17:408
    
      Listening to the radio at lunch today I heard a report saying that the 
    Bengals want to trade names with the Browns???? I guess so the Browns
    would remain in Ohio but in Cin, and the Begal name would go to
    Baltimore with the Clev. team. Making it the Cincinnati Browns and the
    Baltimore Bengals.....Has anyone else heard this Rumor/story??
    
     john
9.3941MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Nov 22 1995 18:108
	Nah, they don't want to do anything like that.

	Afterall that would ruin, Groaner's plans to evolve
	into a Steeler fan.



	billl
9.3942MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 22 1995 18:1410
    
       According to Chris Mortensen, Cleveland is waging a pretty
      strong (maybe even winnable) battle to keep the Browns. Un-
      like when the the Raiders moved to LA, there is now a league
      policy in place. Cleveland has done everything under the policy 
      to merit keeping the team and it's not likely that Tagliabue 
      will recommend for a move. Modell may not have the votes. Even
      if he does have the votes or doesn't and moves anyways, he may
      be opening a can of legal worms. Slim hopes for Clevelanders but
      hopes nonetheless.
9.3943OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Nov 22 1995 18:251
9.3944ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Nov 22 1995 18:2718
  Well, as far as I know the Federal Courts are not bound by the rules of the
NFL. Art Model was arguing in court the other day that being forced to stay in
Cleveland would be a financial hardship and he used for evidence the low fan
turnout last Sunday. 

  Now everyone will respond, "big deal it's your own fault" but it does suggest
that the City of Cleveland is claiming breach of contract to get the courts
to force the Browns to stay put. Problem is that the courts are reluctant to
enforce "specific performance" in the case of a breach which involves forcing
someone to live up to their end of the bargain. They are more likely to impose a
judgment against the defendant which in this case Baltimore will most likely
be happy to pay. 

  Davis set a precedent. Unless there is language in the opinion of that case
specifically geared toward NFL rules the precedent should apply and Cleveland
and the NFL will be stuck with nothing but legal bills trying to stop the move.

  George
9.3945CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Nov 27 1995 11:375
It was pretty cool seeing a Pittsburgh fan sitting next to a Cleveland fan,
both of whom were wearing orange arm-bands.


'Saw
9.3946USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Nov 27 1995 14:5111
>The ONLY reason the NFL is protecting quarterbacks is because the QBs are a
>draw, and if Aikman, Elway, Young and Farve aren't in the game, the ratings
>will go down.

Exactly right.  And if the ratings go down, revenues will follow...and
so will the salaries of these head-hunters.

And 'Saw, how many of those brave QBs of yesteryear faced the kind of
pass-rushers of today (ie: 250-300 lbs, 4.7 40's, bench-pressing who-know-
what) ?  I'm sure getting sacked by Alex Karras is a different experience
than being buried by Bruce Smith.
9.3947What Was The 49'ers Four Losses???LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Nov 27 1995 15:2914
      I am trying to figure out a potential tiebreaker between the 
      Packers and 9'ers.  Suppose (big if), they both end up at 
      12-4.  I suppose one of the 1st tiebreakers is record within 
      the conference.  The Pack would be at 12-4.  What would the
      49'ers be at?  They so far have lost to:
    
      Carolina
      Detroit
      New Orleans
    
      Who is the 4th team?  I hope its from the NFC!  But, I kind of
      think it might have been the Colts.
    
    							Tony
9.3948LUDWIG::GARRYMon Nov 27 1995 15:404
    the 49ers also lost to the Indy Colts....
    
    
    Tom
9.3949CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Nov 27 1995 16:2427
>
>And 'Saw, how many of those brave QBs of yesteryear faced the kind of
>pass-rushers of today (ie: 250-300 lbs, 4.7 40's, bench-pressing who-know-
>what) ?  I'm sure getting sacked by Alex Karras is a different experience
>than being buried by Bruce Smith.
>

Yes and no.  

As the lineman have evolved, so have the QBs.  How many QBs of yesteryear were
going 6'5" and 225?  How many QBs of yesteryear were as mobile as the guys
today?

There comes a point where getting hit by a Big Daddy Lipscomb and a Bruce
Smith has to equal out -- at the point of oblivion.  


I don't know who put the hit on YA Tittle that made him bleed, but you can bet
your bottom dollar that if Troy Boy bleeds today someone's going to get a
fine....


'Saw




9.3950Physics 101LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Nov 27 1995 16:3115
      Bummer that it was the Colts!  Green Bay would have to finish
      with a better recrord then!
    
      On rushers...
    
      Force = Mass * Acceleration
    
      I believe, on average, today's players are bigger than faster.
      Quarterbacks might be bigger, but are there bones any harder???
      On average, they must get hit with more force and its the force
      that probably dictates extent of injury.  (Either that or pressure
      which is force per unit area or in other words takes into account
      the amount of area that the force was applied to.)
    
    						Tony
9.3951Correction...LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Nov 27 1995 16:323
      meant to say bigger AND faster
    
      not bigger than faster...
9.3952Falcons sipODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsMon Nov 27 1995 16:3914
    Not to digress, but leave it up to the dumba** Falcons to make Butty
    look like an offensive genius.  Over 500 total yards offense from a
    team that only got 96 the week before against Carolina!

    That thud that was centered around Atlanta at 7:45 pm last night was
    the sound of everyone jumping off the bandwagon or changing their course
    in mid jump.

    Just think, Krieg passes for 413 yards, and the Falcons meet Marino
    next week.

    This team really sips.

    UMDan 
9.3953CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Nov 27 1995 17:035
Hits are harder, but padding is better, and more for the QBs.
Tittle, Starr and Jurgenson never wore flack-jackets...


'Saw
9.3954MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonMon Nov 27 1995 18:396
>      Bummer that it was the Colts!  Green Bay would have to finish
>     with a better recrord then!


       The first tie-breaker is record against common opponents, so the Pack
        might still have a chance.
9.3955Nah...Still Doesn't Look GoodLUDWIG::BARBIERITue Nov 28 1995 12:0713
      re: -1
    
      I don't think so...
    
      St Louis Rams:
    
      49'ers   2-0
    
      Packers  0-1
    
      That was their first game and one they should have won, imo.
    
    						Tony
9.3956MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Nov 28 1995 14:5410
    
      Even NPR did a piece today on the new fines being levied by
     the NFL. Included was an interview with Al Toon who retired due
     to a series of concussions and still gets them today if he so 
     much as bumps his head. Also interviewed was Greg Lloyd who
     pointed out the hypocrisy of the NFL fining players for vicious
     hits and then selling those same hits on 'greatest hits' videos.
     My take is that this is football. There's no room for dirty play
     but a clean hit is a clean hit and if you can't it take then play
     soccer or figure skate.
9.3957ERICF::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Nov 28 1995 15:364
  Or better yet, play college basketball where every time anyone brushes
anyone else they blow whistles and everyone starts crying "he touched me".

  George
9.3958MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Nov 28 1995 16:061
    See what I mean.
9.3959okay define strength - can't AKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 28 1995 16:2310
    There was a time when contact was minimal in college basketball and a
    high level of shooting and movement skills were a priority.  But
    contact gradually moved into the game to the point where, similar to
    football, only those athletes with a high strength level could compete
    in big time college baskets.
    
    Even the women's game is slowly going the same route towards more and
    more contact.  I think for high level basketball that strength is more
    a priority than even football although for simple bench pressing I
    might take the latter.
9.3960Did Butty win?ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsFri Dec 01 1995 14:124
    Who won last night?  I got in from Albuquerque at about 1:30 am last
    night and didn't even glance at the Sports page this morning.
    
    UMDan
9.3962CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Dec 01 1995 14:4011
Yes, and it was BOOOOOORRRRRRIIIIIINNNNNGGGGGG...

Giants looked like sh*t and so did the Cards.  The only reason the Giants won
was becuse they made less mistakes than the Cards -- and both teams made a lot
of mistakes.

Dave Brown looked like crap on all but one drive, and Krieg was impotent all
night....


'Saw
9.3963OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Dec 01 1995 14:551
9.3964Long seasonODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsFri Dec 01 1995 15:0512
    Yea, except that the Falcons made Butty and Kreig look like offensive
    geniuses last week.  And the 'Fins are up next.

    This season in pro football really sips (IMO).  I just can't seem to
    get excited about it at all, what with a pre-ordained big game (NFC
    Championship 49er-Cowboy), to be followed by the AFC sacrificial lamb
    debacle.

    Oh well, at least TDC and PBS still have on the cooking and home repair
    shows....

    UMDan
9.3965CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Dec 01 1995 15:1212
>    Oh well, at least TDC and PBS still have on the cooking and home repair
>    shows....

Catch Paul Prudhomme on PBS.  He's massive, and I guess they told him lose
weight or else.  So, he wrote this fat-free/reduced-fat cookbook of all these
typical Louisiana delicacies.  

He's doing a series on it now -- it's amazing, and I've learned a lot from it.
Things you'd never think....like low fat jumbalaya and stuff like that!


'Saw
9.3966IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Fri Dec 01 1995 15:214
>Catch Paul Prudhomme on PBS.  He's massive, and I guess they told him lose
>weight or else. 

That's such crap!  Never order food at a restaurant where the chef is thin!
9.3967CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Dec 01 1995 15:2811
|          <<< Note 9.3966 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "Will work for sleep.." >>>
|
|>Catch Paul Prudhomme on PBS.  He's massive, and I guess they told him lose
|>weight or else. 
|
|That's such crap!  Never order food at a restaurant where the chef is thin!


No, he was definitely in "I might not be able to get out my bedroom door"
mode.  I mean massive, as in needing a crane to get him off the toilet....

9.3969CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Dec 01 1995 15:4114
>      He does all of his cooking sitting down if you notice. 


Yes.  I had noticed that.  

Actually, from what I've gathered he's lost some weight, but he's still pretty
big.....


I've grown to like that show.


'Saw

9.3970thanks for the warningOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Dec 01 1995 15:433
9.3971CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Dec 01 1995 15:473
It's more interesting than the Dan Reeves-Butty Ryan show, that's for sure! 8^)


9.3972SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Fri Dec 01 1995 16:406
    
    	You know it was a boring game. When ESPN shows highlights of
    about 6 incomplete passes. Just to extend the highlight segment so
    it wasn't to short.
    
    Ron
9.3973AKOCOA::BREENFri Dec 01 1995 17:213
    Since he has two out of three, perhaps this Prudhomme could play Nero
    Wolfe in another go at the Rex Stout series.  They made such a hash of
    their attempt 15 years ago.  Has he ever mentioned orchids on the show?
9.3974CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Dec 01 1995 17:3621
>    their attempt 15 years ago.  Has he ever mentioned orchids on the show?

No.

But he has mentioned:

		
			crayfish pie
			gumbo
			jumbalaya
			tasso 
			rice
			seasonings

etc etc etc....


He'd be good, except he probably couldn't film ANY action scenes, unless they
had a stunt-double in a fat suit...8^)
			

9.3976O Sole MioCAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Dec 01 1995 17:518
>    And he uses apple juice to sweeten everything.  I'd rather watch
>    Maryanne Esposito cook italian.  

Si, butta have-a you watched-a datta nice-a show, Biba Cooks Italian?


8^)

9.3977More food chatterODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsFri Dec 01 1995 18:1112
    Biba's okay, The Frugal Gourmet is getting old but is still fun to
    watch, and Julia Child is, ah, lets just say, interesting in a strange
    sort of way (I still keep seeing in my mind a Julia Child take-off skit
    done on SNL by Dan Ackroyd).  Justin Wilson is hard to watch (IMO), and
    I am subjected to Martha Stewart a little bit more than I care to be
    'cause my wife likes to watch her.
    
    Still prefer TOH, Hometime and the Furniture Guys though.
    
    Great football talk, huh?
    
    UMDan 
9.3978try Too Many Cooks or Fer de LanceAKOCOA::BREENFri Dec 01 1995 18:149
    Nero never left the house, his exercise was darts and then later when
    he got into shape, billiards.  He had his gofer/agitator Archie do all
    the leg work.  His first dozen from '35-'50 were pretty good, later he
    became pretty ordinary but the humor always saved these works.
    
    It's amazing how television could take a work like that and simply
    massacre it in trying to make it fit what sells to the 11 year old
    audience that they write for.  Not that 11 year olds watch, it's just
    that whatever it is has to fit a 5th grade education.
9.3979CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Dec 01 1995 18:1851
>    Biba's okay, 

Yep.

>The Frugal Gourmet is getting old but is still fun to
>    watch, 

Except when he get to babbling.  He's started that lately (past 2-3 years)


>and Julia Child is, ah, lets just say, interesting in a strange
>    sort of way (I still keep seeing in my mind a Julia Child take-off skit
>    done on SNL by Dan Ackroyd).  

The Katherine Hepburn (and I love Kate dearly) of cooking -- she gots the voice
and the shakes....


>Justin Wilson is hard to watch (IMO), 

Yep.

>    I am subjected to Martha Stewart a little bit more than I care to be
>    'cause my wife likes to watch her.

Dan, that's grounds for divorce.  Martha Stewart is the most over-pretentious,
boring person on TV.  No one gives dinner parties and crap like that, you've
got to be kidding me...   

I almost laughed my ass off the day she was on Imus and Imus was asking her if
she was familiar with the Wilford Brimley Quaker Oatmeal method of stuffing a
turkey...


>    Still prefer TOH, Hometime and the Furniture Guys though.

Yep.  Furniture Guys ROOL....

Caught a re-run the other day were Ed says "Take a Mason jar" then he turns to
Joe L'Errerio and says "Joe, you have to take a Knights of Columbus jar".  I
was rolling...

    
>    Great football talk, huh?
    
Yeah, better than butty-ball....





9.3981Oh there are those M. Stewart types indeedAKOCOA::BREENFri Dec 01 1995 19:164
    I have a sister in law in East Grand Rapids who does everything exactly
    like Martha Stewart: house, food presentations, the whole nine yards.
    
    
9.3982Another attempt to close the culture gapMUNDIS::SSHERMANClean living and a fast outfieldMon Dec 04 1995 11:027
The name Paul Prudhomme rings a definite bell.  Where might I have seen
it or him?

Actually, a really strict moderator would have banned this to the Junk
Note.  Of course, it was the moderator who started it... ;*)

Steve
9.3983CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Dec 04 1995 11:5428
>
>The name Paul Prudhomme rings a definite bell.  Where might I have seen
>it or him?
>

He's a chef from Louisiana (prolly Nawlins) who does a lot of traditional
Louisiana cooking -- it might be cajun but I'm not really sure what all cajun
cookin' encompasses.

He's written cookbooks and done TV shows and stuff, and he was/is REALLY
HEAVY.


>Actually, a really strict moderator would have banned this to the Junk
>Note.  Of course, it was the moderator who started it... ;*)

This is true, but the junk note was being consumed by the "how many fans can
dance on the head of a pin" debate.....



Tommy, agreed about Ed's jokes -- it's like someone who uses TOO much pepper in
their cooking.  Past a certain amount, it just hides the rest of the flavors.


'Saw


9.3984CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Dec 04 1995 12:3525
Getting back on track:


	o Any day that Dallas loses is a good day.  Switzer doesn't have
	  the touch with the Cowboys that Johnson had, and I have a feeling
	  the Jerry Jones mistake is going to come to the fore over the
	  next couple of seasons.


	o The San Francisco-Buffalo game last night was very enjoyable.
	  I thought it was a pretty good slug-fest and the line matchups
	  were great.  Lots and lots and lots of battling going on in the
	  pit last night. My man Harris Barton just keeps getting it
	  done...


	o Green Bay is all alone atop the NFC Central, a spot that they've
	  not been in alone in December since 1972, my freshman year of
	  High School....

	
	o Oakland is not the same team when Hostetler is not at the helm....


'Saw
9.3985Falcons tailspinODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsMon Dec 04 1995 12:5014
    Well, that empty wagon circling the Perimeter here in Atlanta is the
    bandwagon that was formerly occupied by the folks who were rootin' for
    the Falcons (all 2 of them).  First Butty "The offensive genius" Ryan
    game, then the June "I suck as a coach" Jones game (he just about
    admitted as much in the post game press conference) against the Fins.  

    I really would like to try and root for this team, but they are making
    sure that I and any other hopeful fans abandon them in droves.  They play
    NO, then Carolina, then SF on Christmas Eve.  They could be 7-9 to end the
    season.  Man they sip.

    At least the 'Skins won.

    UMDan
9.39861972 PackersLUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Dec 04 1995 17:1410
      Green Bay in 1972 - John Brockington and MacArthur Lane (whose
      autograph I got that year).  Too bad they didn't have a QB.  They
      played the Redskins in the playoffs and I believe lost 16-3.
      The Redskins stacked something like 8 or 9 guys at the line the
      entire game.  The Pack was being forced to throw and thats something
      they really couldn't do!!!
    
      I was one year away from my freshman year.
    
    						Tony
9.3987ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 04 1995 17:173
9.3988OLD1S::CADZILLA2Ain't this boogie a messMon Dec 04 1995 17:512
    
    I did'nt know Brockington went to Oklahoma State.  /;^)>
9.3989AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Dec 04 1995 18:036
    
    
    Did he have the same type of brilliant NFL career that Archie Griffin
    had. 
    
    Jerry
9.3990CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearTue Dec 05 1995 12:005
I remember a Redskin player stripping the ball from one of the Packers.
It was the first time I'd ever seen that in an NFL game.

I remember the Pack's one FG -- I think it was Chester Marcol kicking, but I
could be wrong....  That's getting to be a long time ago now, I guess.
9.3991MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonTue Dec 05 1995 12:457
> I remember the Pack's one FG -- I think it was Chester Marcol kicking, but I
> could be wrong....  That's getting to be a long time ago now, I guess.

  Yup, it was Chester Marcol - he had a great season in 1972.  I thought
  the Packers would actually win that game (Washington had not played well in 
  the final 3 games of the regular season), but the Redksins stepped up a level
  against Green Bay and Dallas, plus Scott Hunter was a rather poor QB.
9.3992More Musings...STRATA::BARBIERIWed Dec 06 1995 14:5910
      One thing that made the Pack look ok was how good the Skins
      fared the rest of the way.  They slaughtered Dallas and lost
      a fairly close SB game to that undefeated Miami team.
    
      Boy, good memory on that strip (I have no memory of it).
    
      That was one heck of a pair of horses in the backfield at that
      time.  If Hunter was a good QB...
    
    						Tony
9.3993CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Dec 06 1995 15:034
>      That was one heck of a pair of horses in the backfield at that
>      time.  If Hunter was a good QB...
    
Ain't THAT the truth!
9.3994Watch Those Lions!!!LUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Dec 06 1995 16:3422
      Getting back to the present, would anyone want to play the
      Lions in the playoffs?  The paper credited their defensive
      effort against the Bears to their finally getting accustomed
      to the 4-3.  I guess Kramer was hit more so than in any other
      game.  They amassed less than 200 yards total offense and they
      are like 1st or 2nd in the league offensively.  Detroit got
      over 400 yards.
    
      Meanwhile, you've got a QB that can be hot, one of the best
      WR's in Herman Moore, a fine underrated Perriman, and of course
      Barry Sanders.
    
      The Lions started off 0-3.  They are now 7-6 meaning 7-3 in the
      last ten games as well as 4-0 for the last 4.
    
      If I was to be my most pessimistic self, I would predict Green
      Bay just missing out on a 1st round bye and having Detroit at
      GB for their first playoff game - and losing!
      
      I wouldn't want to face those Lions!
    
    						Tony
9.3995Officially only 3 teams in each Division are outMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Dec 06 1995 16:4510
    Detroit AT Green Bay is a no Brainer put your money on GB...
    Detroit is not the same on grass.  There 7-3 over there last
    10, I don't know which one's they won/lost but 7 or there last
    10 games were in DOMES.  3 of there last 4 were at home.
    
    The LAST team the Lions should want to face in rnd 1 would be
    the Packers.  I think Detroit will travel to Philly in the 1st
    round and either Minny or Atlanta in Green Bay.
    
    							MaB
9.3996USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Dec 06 1995 19:3615
>plus Scott Hunter was a rather poor QB.

Are you guys sure Hunter was the QB in that game ?


Re:  Brockington and Griffin

Brockington had a much better career.  He got 1,000 in each of his first
3 (or was it 4 ?) years, when they played just 14 games.  I believe only
Jim Brown had done that previously .


BTW, GB played Washington, at RFK, during the regular season and I believe
lost 16-13, or 16-10...I not have the score correct, but it was a close
game and the Pack did get a TD.
9.3997It Was HunterLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Dec 07 1995 11:186
      I know it was Scott Hunter.  I still remember the Monday night 
      24-23 thriller over the Lions that year.  The Pack was down
      something like 23-7 and came back.  Hunter never had a better
      game.
    
    						Tony
9.3998Green Bay is clearly the best in CentralACISS1::WIERSBECKI sweat Mickey MouseThu Dec 07 1995 11:469
    Actually, I wouldn't mind my Vikes taking on Detroit again.  We beat
    them the first time around, then lost a wild one on Thanksgiving. 
    Unfortunately, two Vikes TD's were called back, but they still nearly
    overcame that to win in Pontiac.
    
    Fontes will find a way to screw up.  
    
    
    Spud
9.3999CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearThu Dec 07 1995 12:006
Hey Spud,

How goes it?  Talk to MrT at all lately????


'Saw
9.4000snarf - this is my golf score :^)LANDO::FARLEYThu Dec 07 1995 12:531
    
9.4001Or putt-puttBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredThu Dec 07 1995 13:0211
>                      <<< Note 9.4000 by LANDO::FARLEY >>>
>                   -< snarf - this is my golf score    :^) >-
>
 

   Only for the front nine Kev.  :-)

   Welcome back!

   Kevin   

9.4002one less team to worry 'boutUSCTR1::GARBARINOThu Dec 07 1995 13:383
>    Fontes will find a way to screw up.  

Yeah, I'm hoping he saves his job.
9.4003USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Dec 11 1995 16:356
One boring weekend of televised NFL games in the greater-Boston area.
Min-Cle, Ari-SD, NE-Jets, Gia-Was and GB-TB.  YECH !  Can't do anything
about pre-season scheduling of the Saturday games, but I hate the NFL's
home-team protection rule which mandates that we see only the Patriots
in the 1pm slot (when they're home), AND blows away the NBC double-header,
forcing FOX' Gia-Was alternative at 4pm.
9.4004Playoff teams schedulesHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedMon Dec 11 1995 16:3924
Remaining schedule of probabl playoff teams.

Kansas City*	11- 2-0		vs Denver		vs Seattle	
Pittsburgh	10- 4-0		vs New England		at Green Bay
Buffalo		 9- 5-0		vs Miami		vs Buffalo
Indianapolis	 8- 6-0		vs San Diego		vs New England
Oakland		 8- 6-0		at Seattle		vs Denver
Miami*		 7- 6-0		at Buffalo		at St Louis
San Diego	 7- 7-0		vs Indianapolis		vs NY Giants
Seattle		 7- 7-0		vs Oakland		at Kansas City
Denver		 7- 7-0		at Kansas City		at Oakland

	*Kansas City plays at Miami tonight

San Francisco	10- 4-0		vs Minnesota		at Atlanta
Dallas		10- 4-0		vs NY Giants		at Arizona
Philadelphia	 9- 5-0		vs Arizona		at Chicago
Green Bay	 9- 5-0		at New Orleans		vs Pittsburgh
Detroit		 8- 6-0		vs Jacksonville		at Tampa Bay
Minnesota	 8- 6-0		at San Francisco	at Cincinnati
Atlanta		 8- 6-0		at Carolina		vs San Francisco
Chicago		 7- 7-0		vs Tampa Bay		vs Philadelphia
Tampa Bay	 7- 7-0		at Chicago		vs Detroit
St Louis	 7- 7-0		vs Washington		vs Miami
9.4005SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Mon Dec 11 1995 18:115
    
    	Who is Buffalo playing in the last week? They can't be playing
    themselves. :^)
    
    Ron
9.4006SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Mon Dec 11 1995 20:5021
    
    	In looking at the schedules and records. I see KC, Pittsburgh, and
    Buffalo winning the divisions. Miami must win tonight or I see an 8-8
    team making the playoffs in the AFC.
    	Oakland/KC combination will give Denver/Seattle an 8th loss.
    Possible the Raiders with 8 losses. Anyways only 1 team out of Denver/
    Seattle/Oakland will have 9 wins. So give a wildcard to the AFC West. Which
    leaves us 2 spots.
    	If Miami loses tonight. The Patriots still have a chance. It all
    depends on this week. With a Miami loss tonight, I only see two things
    needing to occur for the Patriots to make the playoffs. 1) They must
    win both games. 2) Buffalo beats Miami or St Louis beats Miami.
    	Reason being is with the Patriots winning out. Plus, Miami losing
    2 out of three.  There will be 2 teams with 9 wins or better. One in
    the AFC West. With the other being in the AFC East or West. Which
    leaves the last spot to an 8-8 team. Since there will be 3, 4, or 5
    teams tied at 8-8. The Patriots get the playoff spot. Based on the
    best conference record. The Patriots would be 8-4 in the AFC. With
    everybody else having at least 5 AFC loses.
    
    Ron
9.4007Ramblin'ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsTue Dec 12 1995 12:0214
    Sort of hard to figure out how the season will end up this year.  The
    two supposed dominant teams, SF and Dallas have looked mortal at times
    (Dallas recently, SF earlier), though 'Frisco looks like they are
    getting their act together in time for the playoffs.  Dallas could
    still be there despite Switzer.

    The AFC looks less defined, though the Steelers look tough of late, and
    the Raiders and KC have stumbled.  Can't believe that the Bills may
    actually make it to the big dance again!

    Maybe, just maybe the SB will actually be competitive and close this
    year.  Wonder how much attention a GB - Buffalo SB would attract?

    UMDan
9.4008neon in the nimbus nemesisAKOCOA::BREENTue Dec 12 1995 14:204
    The way the mind of these athletes work the Switzer blunder followed by
    his defense by the team followed by the universal attacks by the media
    should work to benefit of the cowboys as they now circle the wagons and
    Barry preaches them vs us one of the new coach's favorite techniques.
9.4009corrected rest o' scheduleHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Dec 12 1995 14:4724
Remaining schedule of probabl playoff teams.

Kansas City	11- 3-0		vs Denver		vs Seattle
Pittsburgh	10- 4-0		vs New England		at Green Bay
Buffalo		 9- 5-0		vs Miami		vs Houston
Indianapolis	 8- 6-0		vs San Diego		vs New England
Miami		 8- 6-0		at Buffalo		at St Louis
Oakland		 8- 6-0		at Seattle		vs Denver
San Diego	 7- 7-0		at Indianapolis		at NY Giants
Seattle		 7- 7-0		vs Oakland		at Kansas City
Denver		 7- 7-0		at Kansas City		at Oakland

San Francisco	10- 4-0		vs Minnesota		at Atlanta
Dallas		10- 4-0		vs NY Giants		at Arizona
Philadelphia	 9- 5-0		vs Arizona		at Chicago
Green Bay	 9- 5-0		at New Orleans		vs Pittsburgh
Detroit		 8- 6-0		vs Jacksonville		at Tampa Bay
Minnesota	 8- 6-0		at San Francisco	at Cincinnati
Atlanta		 8- 6-0		at Carolina		vs San Francisco
Chicago		 7- 7-0		vs Tampa Bay		vs Philadelphia
Tampa Bay	 7- 7-0		at Chicago		vs Detroit
St Louis	 7- 7-0		vs Washington		vs Miami

TTom
9.4010MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonTue Dec 12 1995 19:5322
San Francisco	10- 4-0		vs Minnesota		at Atlanta
Dallas		10- 4-0		vs NY Giants		at Arizona
Philadelphia	 9- 5-0		vs Arizona		at Chicago
Green Bay	 9- 5-0		at New Orleans		vs Pittsburgh
Detroit		 8- 6-0		vs Jacksonville		at Tampa Bay
Minnesota	 8- 6-0		at San Francisco	at Cincinnati
Atlanta		 8- 6-0		at Carolina		vs San Francisco
Chicago		 7- 7-0		vs Tampa Bay		vs Philadelphia
Tampa Bay	 7- 7-0		at Chicago		vs Detroit
St Louis	 7- 7-0		vs Washington		vs Miami

TTom

This week:  SF over Minny, Jax over Detroit, Carolina over Atlanta,
Chicago over Tampa Bay, Washington over St.Louis

Next Week:  TB over Detroit, Cinci over Minny, SF over Atlanta,
Philly over Chicago, TB over Detroit, Carolina over Washington.

My question, under this scenario, there is a 7-way-tie between Detroit,
Minnesota, Atlanta, Chicago, Tampa Bay, and Carolina, with St.Louis as
a possible 7th team in the tie.  Can Carolina make the playoffs ?
9.4011CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westWed Dec 13 1995 17:538
    
    I believe (not certain) that under your scenerio, Carolina will not go
    because of tie-breakers.  Of the seven teams, the two with the best
    Conference record will go to the playoffs.  I don't think Carolina
    would be that team.
    
    Marc
    
9.4012a great one goes downOLD1S::CADZILLA2My python boot is to tightWed Dec 13 1995 20:295
    
    Word from the football notesfile indicates that Green Bay's Reggie
    White is out for the season. He will go under the knife for a torn
    hamstring in the area of his right knee. His age will be a problem
    for his return next year. At 34 this will be a tough rehab.
9.4013not good enoughHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedThu Dec 14 1995 13:385
Carolina is elimintated by their conference record. They can finish 8-8
which is good enough for some teams but the Painters lose all the tie
breakers.

TTom
9.4014MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonMon Dec 18 1995 13:5121
	So, can anyone inform me as to who has what advantages in the
	wild card race ?

	Here's my understanding:

	First, divisions standings are set.  First tie-breaker is head-to-head,
	next division records, next common opponents, next conference records,
	and finally net points.

	Then, teams in different divisions with the same records and eligible
	for a wild card spot are compared.  That is, suppose Chicago, Minnesota,
	and Atlanta all end up 8-8 in the battle for WC spot #3.  Chicago
	and Minnesota are compared, and Chicago ends up with a better division
	record than Minnesota (I'm not sure that is the case; just an example).
	Then Chicago and Atlanta are compared, and Chicago wins based on
	records versus common opponents.

	So, with that in mind, how do the AFC and NFC races stack up ?

	[Having clinched playoff spots: SF, Dallas, GB, Philadelphia, Buffalo,
	Pittsburgh, KC]
9.4015SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Dec 18 1995 14:006
  Last I looked the tie breakers for division title and wild card spot were
a bit different. For example tie breakers for division title consider record in
the division fairly high up. Tie breakers for wild card do not consider
division record record at all and consider conference record fairly high up.

  George
9.4016MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonMon Dec 18 1995 14:0517
>  Last I looked the tie breakers for division title and wild card spot were
>a bit different. For example tie breakers for division title consider record in
>the division fairly high up. Tie breakers for wild card do not consider
>division record record at all and consider conference record fairly high up.

 The divisional and wild card tie-breaker rules were changed slightly last
 year.  Prior to last year, you could have had the following scenario:

 Teams tied for wild card spots 2+3, all with 9-7 records, 2 are in division A
 and 1 in division B:

 Team 1, Division A, division record 4-4, conference mark 7-5
 Team 2, Division A, division record 5-3, conference mark 6-6
 Team 3, Division B, division record 4-4, conference mark 7-5.

 Prior to last year, teams 1 and 3 would go to the playoffs.  Beginning
 with last year, teams 2 and 3 would go to the playoffs.
9.4017MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonTue Dec 19 1995 00:3980
The possibilities for the NFL playoffs through Sunday, Dec. 17, according to
the league: 

AFC EAST
Buffalo: Clinched division title and will host a wild-card round game.

Indianapolis: Can clinch a wild-card spot with a victory, or a Seattle loss
and either a Miami loss or an Oakland loss.

Miami: Can clinch a wild-card spot with a victory and one of the following:
An Indianapolis loss or tie; a San Diego loss or tie; an Oakland loss or tie; or
a Seattle victory; or three of the following: An Indianapolis loss; a San Diego
loss; an Oakland loss; and a Seattle loss.

AFC CENTRAL
Pittsburgh: Clinched division title and first-round bye. Can clinch
home-field advantage throughout the AFC playoffs with a victory and a
Kansas City loss.

AFC WEST
Kansas City: Clinched division title and first-round bye. Can clinch
home-field advantage throughout playoffs with a victory or tie or a
Pittsburgh loss or tie.

Oakland: Can clinch a wild-card spot with a victory and either a Seattle
loss or any two of the following: An Indianapolis loss, a Miami loss and a
San Diego loss.

San Diego: Can clinch wild-card spot with a victory or either an Oakland
loss and a Seattle loss or an Indianapolis loss and either a Miami loss or a
Seattle loss. 

Seattle: Can clinch wild-card spot with a victory and any of the following:
An Indianapolis loss or tie; a Miami loss or tie; or a San Diego loss or tie.

Denver: Can clinch wild-card spot with a victory and an Indianapolis loss
and a Seattle victory and either a Miami loss or a San Diego loss. 



NFC EAST
Dallas: Clinched playoff spot. Can clinch division title and first-round bye
with a victory or tie or a Philadelphia loss or tie. Can clinch home-field
advantage throughout the NFC playoffs with either a victory or tie and a San
Francisco loss in either of its final two games or with a Philadelphia loss or
tie and two San Francisco losses.

Philadelphia: Clinched playoff spot. Can clinch division title and
first-round bye with a victory and a Dallas loss. Can clinch home-field
advantage throughout the playoffs with a victory and a Dallas loss and a San
Francisco loss in either of its final two games.

NFC CENTRAL
Green Bay: Clinched playoff spot. Can clinch division title with victory or
tie or a Detroit loss or tie. Can clinch first-round bye with a victory and two
San Francisco losses.

Detroit: Can clinch playoff spot with a victory or tie or a Minnesota loss in
either of its last two games or an Atlanta loss or tie. Can clinch division 
title with a victory and a Green Bay loss. Can clinch a first-round bye with a
victory and two San Francisco losses and a Green Bay loss.

Minnesota: Can clinch a playoff spot with two victories or one victory and a
Chicago loss or tie and an Atlanta loss or tie.

Chicago: Can clinch a playoff spot with a victory and a Minnesota loss in
either of its last two games and an Atlanta loss or tie.

NFC WEST
San Francisco: Clinched division title. Can clinch first-round bye with one
victory or a Green Bay loss and a Detroit loss. Can clinch home-field
advantage throughout the NFC playoffs with two victories or one victory
and a Dallas loss and a Philadelphia loss or tie.

Atlanta: Can clinch a playoff spot with a victory and either a Minnesota loss
or a Detroit loss or two Minnesota losses and a Chicago loss and a St. Louis
loss.

St. Louis: Can clinch a playoff spot with a victory and two Minnesota losses
and a Chicago loss and an Atlanta loss. 
9.4018MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonTue Dec 19 1995 00:459
	Given the previous scenario, I would guess that the playoffs are
	likely to have:

	San Fransisco	12-4		Kansas City	13-3
	Dallas		12-4		Pittsburgh	11-5
	Green Bay	11-5		Buffalo		11-5
	Philadelphia	11-5		San Diego	 9-7
	Detroit		10-6		Indianapolis	 9-7
	Minnesota	 9-7		Oakland		 9-7
9.4019WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Dec 19 1995 11:2013
    
    I feel Seattle is more likely than Oakland.  Both Seattle 
    (at KC) and Oakland (Denver) need to win.
    
    Sure Seattle is away, but they only need one other loss
    by Miami, SD, or Indy.  Oakland (choooooke) needs 
    either Seattle to lose or 2 other losses.
    
    Is Mirer out for good this year?  I know he's injured now, but
    at least they benched him to straighten his head out when it was 
    warranted (unlike Drew who was left in to fester away)...
    
    - Sean
9.4020MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonTue Dec 19 1995 13:552
	But Seattle needs to win at K.C. (Chiefs are 7-0 in the AFC West),
	while Oakland plays Denver at home.
9.4021WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Dec 19 1995 15:253
    
    But it's that special time of the year for Marty :^)
    
9.4022CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westTue Dec 19 1995 15:257
    
    As a Raider fan, this weekend I was dreading the Seahawks.  They are a
    MUCH better team than the record indicates.  They got off to a slow
    start, but have steamrolled over teams lately.
    
    Marc
    
9.4023OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Dec 19 1995 15:371
9.4024MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allTue Dec 19 1995 16:528
	Hard to believe there's been no comment in here
	on the spittle-spewing Brian Cox's tirade after he
	was ejected.   This is the best the 'phins can come
	up with for a NFL Man of the Year nominee?



	billl
9.4025Rules for NFL TiebreakerAKOCOA::BREENTue Dec 19 1995 16:53185
Did they change the procedure from last year?   From this I gather that if
    multiple teams are tied that they first use the division tb rules and
    the survivor of that then compares with the "top seed" of the other
    divisions.  Once a team makes the tiebreaker then the whole thing
    starts again.  There are procedures prior to "seeding".  Last year I'd
    gather that four teams from nfl central wouldn't have made it to the
    wildcard/playoffs.
    
    Rules follow
    
      
  Tiebreaking procedures for NFL playoffs
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
  The following procedures will be used to break ties for playoff
  berths and to determine regular- season schedules for next season:
  
  To break a tie within a division
  If, at the end of the regular season, two or more clubs in the same
  division finish with identical won-lost-tied percentages, the
  following steps will be taken until a champion is determined.
  
  Two clubs
  1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the
  clubs).
  
  2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
  division.
  
  3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
  conference.
  
  4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, if applicable.
  
  5. Best net points in division games.
  
  6. Best net points in all games.
  
  7. Strength of schedule.
  
  8. Best net touchdowns in all games.
  
  9. Coin toss.
  
  Three or more clubs
  (Note: If two clubs remain tied after a third or other clubs are
  eliminated during any step, tiebreaker reverts to step 1 of the
  two-club format.)
  
  1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games among the
  clubs).
  
  2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
  division.
  
  3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
  conference.
  
  4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, if applicable.
  
  5. Best net points in division games.
  
  6. Best net points in all games.
  
  7. Strength of schedule.
  
  8. Best net touchdowns in all games.
  
  9. Coin toss.
  
  To break a tie for the wild-card team
  If it is necessary to break ties to determine the three wild-card
  clubs from each conference, the following steps will be taken.
  
  1. If the tied clubs are from the same division, apply division
  tiebreaker.
  
  2. If the tied clubs are from difference divisions, apply the
  following steps.
  
  Two clubs
  1. Head-to-head, if applicable.
  
  2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
  conference.
  
  3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
  
  4. Best average net points in conference games.
  
  5. Best net points in all games.
  
  6. Strength of schedule.
  
  7. Best net touchdowns in all games.
  
  8. Coin toss.
  
  Three or more clubs
  (Note: If two clubs remain tied after third or other clubs are
  eliminated, tiebreaker reverts to step 1 of applicable two-club
  format).
  
  1. Apply division tiebreaker to eliminate all but the highest-ranked
  club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original
  seeding within a division upon application of the division
  tiebreaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the
  procedure that are necessary to identify the three wild-card
  participants.
  
  2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated
  each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others).
  
  3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
  conference.
  
  4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
  
  5. Best average net points in conference games.
  
  6. Best net points in all games.
  
  7. Strength of schedule.
  
  8. Best net touchdowns in all games.
  
  9. Coin toss.
  
  When the first wild-card team has been identified, the procedure is
  repeated to name the second wild card, i.e., eliminate all but the
  highest-ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2,
  and repeated a third time, if necessary, to identify the third wild
  card. In situations where three or more teams from the same division
  are involved in the procedure, the original seeding of the teams
  remains the same for subsequent applications of the tiebreaker if
  the top-ranked team in that division qualifies for a wild-card
  berth.
  
  Other tie-breaking procedures
  Only one club advances to the playoffs in any tiebreaking step.
  Remaining tied clubs revert to the first step of the applicable
  division or wild-card tiebreakers. As an example, if two clubs
  remain tied in any tiebreaker step after all other clubs have been
  eliminated, the procedure reverts to step 1 or the two-club format
  to determine the winner. When one club wins the tie-breaker, all
  other clubs revert to step 1 of the applicable two-club or
  three-club format.
  
  2. In comparing division and conference records or records against
  common opponents among tied teams, the best won-lost-tied percentage
  is the deciding factor since teams might have played an unequal
  number of games.
  
  3. To determine home-field priority among division titlists, apply
  wild-card tiebreakers.
  
  4. To determine home-field priority for wild-card qualifiers, apply
  division tiebreakers (if teams are from the same division) or
  wild-card tiebreakers (if teams are from different divisions).
  
  Tiebreaking procedure for meeting selection
  If two or more clubs are tied in the selection order, the
  strength-of-schedule tiebreaker is applied, subject to the following
  exceptions for playoff clubs:
  
  1. The Super Bowl winner is last and the Super Bowl loser
  next-to-last.
  
  2. Any non-Super Bowl playoff club involved in a tie shall be
  assigned priority within its segment below that of non-playoff clubs
  and in the order that the playoff clubs exited from the playoffs.
  Thus, within a tied segment a playoff club that loses in the
  wild-card game will have priority over a playoff club that loses in
  the divisional playoff game, which in turn will have priority over a
  club that loses in the conference championship game. If two tied
  clubs exited the playoffs in the same round, the tie is broken by
  strength-of-schedule.
  
  If any ties cannot be broken by strength-of-schedule, the divisional
  or conference tie-breakers, whichever are applicable, are applied.
  Any ties that still exist are broken by a coin flip.




9.4026MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allTue Dec 19 1995 16:557
	re -.1:

	Not bad for right off the top of the noggin, Sen-sei.



	billl
9.4027truer words were never spokenMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allTue Dec 19 1995 17:4410
 favorite quote off the internet:

"In the second quarter of the Cowboys' 21-20 win, Brown 
 scrambled by the flailing Sanders, who gets about 35 cents 
 for his tackling and $34,999,999.65 for the rest of his game."


billl


9.4028SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Dec 19 1995 17:5111
  Well Sanders seems to be pretty effective even if he doesn't make tackles.
Football is a very specialized game and there are lots of players who have some
talents but not others. Kickers can't run that well, runners don't pass that
well QBs don't normally kick that well.

  The question is, do the guys he's covering gain more or less yardage when
being covered by Sanders than they do when being covered by someone else? I've
got to believe someone feels that they gain less or he wouldn't get paid the
money he gets.

  George
9.4029pay for performance is alive and wellMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allTue Dec 19 1995 17:567
...and everyone is paid ONLY according to their ability.

	right!



billl
9.4030Please no more LDUCAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Dec 19 1995 18:275
    
    
     re -.2 
    
     I would just like to ask all of sports not to respond to that.  
9.4031OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Dec 19 1995 18:351
9.4032ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsTue Dec 19 1995 18:486
    Go to 251.82 and run the program.  Or bang your head into a wall a
    couple hundred times.
    
    HTH
    
    UMDan
9.4033A Helluva PrognosticeerAKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustTue Dec 26 1995 18:267
    My congratulations to the heroic Ms Karen Derry for winning da pool-95,
    in a two-peat.  She was all but buried and the obits mentioned the C
    word and she came back with 12 out of 15 to bury, among others, Ttom.
    
    For those interested or perhaps having dropped out when the going got
    to tough, we now have the playoff pool.  
    Then we'll combine them all.
9.4034in case you were wonderingMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Dec 29 1995 14:4111
	I just scanned the "Season long over/under contest"
	in Pool_95.  Couldn't help but notice that the BIG
	disappointments for 1995 are New England, Cleveland,
	Arizona and the Jets, all tied at -5.

	The winner of the over-acheiver award goes to KC
	for finishing +5, with Carolina hot on their tail
	at +4.


	billl
9.4035pimento is betterHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Dec 29 1995 14:4839
Cleveland is going to make a lot of all-disappointing in 95 sprots lists.

Personally, I have a great memento of their demise, a ticket from Vegas
for them to win the whole thang. It woulda payed a lousy 7-1 anyway. I'll
prolly frame it.


Team              Line   Wins       O/U     by
-----------------------------------------------------
San Francisco     12.5     11     Under     -2
Dallas            11.5     12      Over      0
Miami             10.5      9     Under     -2
Pittsburgh        10.5     11      Over      0
New England       10.5      6     Under     -5
Cleveland          9.5      5     Under     -5
Oakland            9.5      8     Under     -2
San Diego          9.5      9     Under     -1
Denver             8.5      8     Under     -1
Chicago            8.5      9      Over      0
Detroit            8.5     10      Over      1
Buffalo            8.5     10      Over      1
Minnesota          8.5      8     Under     -1
Green Bay          8.5     11      Over      2
NY Giants          8.5      5     Under     -4
Arizona            8.5      4     Under     -5
Philadelphia       8.5     10      Over      1
Kansas City        7.5     13      Over      5
Indianapolis       7.5      9      Over      1
Seattle            7.5      8      Over      0
Atlanta            7.5      9      Over      1
NY Jets            7.5      3     Under     -5
New Orleans        7.5      7     Under     -1
Tampa Bay          6.5      7      Over      0
Washington         6.5      6     Under     -1
Cincinnati         5.5      7      Over      1
St Louis           5.5      7      Over      1
Houston            5.5      7      Over      1
Carolina           2.5      7      Over      4
Jacksonville       2.5      4      Over      1
9.4036did Karen win that too?MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Dec 29 1995 14:487
	Just to set the record straight I finished ABOVE the
	"UMDanbillline" in the aforementioned contest with 
	an amazing 16-14 in the O/U and a stellar 18-12 in the
	"will they make the 'offs" catagory.


	billl
9.4038way too goHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Dec 29 1995 15:008
>    Mikey won thised one.

So he says.

As the semi-proud sponsor of thised event, I'll defer to any and all
corrections ;-).

TTom
9.4039MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Dec 29 1995 15:205
	I'll probably regret this, but, is there any chance
	of getting the results of said contest poste?


	billl
9.4040da POOLHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Dec 29 1995 15:4410
Along the way today, we posted about ever thang we talked about like POOL
results, bowl results, etc.

And on about ever one of those thangs ol' billl's been a little outta
sync.

Mikey did the cyphering over in POOL for thised one. Ever thang else is
over there, too, either, both, yet.

TTom
9.4041MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Dec 29 1995 15:528
	Well, excuuuuuuse me!  Could someone maybe provide
	a pointer to the results of the nfl o/u contest 
	over in Pool_95?  This hapless fool can only seem
	to find the cumulative results of the pickees, but
	no mention of how the pickers did.


	billl
9.4042Nontechnoweenie needs helpTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is #1 - again!!!Fri Dec 29 1995 16:084
    Can someone give me a pointer to POOL itself?  Like, let me hit KP7 and
    have it magically appear or somethin'?
    
    NAZZ
9.4043and the results are...HBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Dec 29 1995 16:3958
billl,

here's about ever thang I could come up with. put it together with a
little smiley and you got yourself a real package...

My confusion comes from the fack that you replied to it but what the hey.

           <<< HBAHBA::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]POOL_95.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< POOL 95 >-
================================================================================
Note 7.39                    Miscellaneous Comments                     39 of 41
CNTROL::CHILDS "Washing Machine"                     27 lines  28-DEC-1995 12:46
                          -< over and under results >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    
    Well I couldn't post this in the season long over and under note
    but here's the unofficial results. A real runaway. Wish I went to
    Vegas..........
    
Player		over/under   		playoffs
-------------------------------------------------------
Childs		23	.766		9 	.750
Neuzil		19	.633		7	.583
Dudek		18	.600		8	.666
Breen		17	.566		8	.666
Huber		16	.533		8	.666
Derry		16	.533		8	.666
Garry		16	.533		7	.583
Brule		16	.533		6	.500
Haas		15	.500		8	.666
Nazz		15	.500		8	.666
Zogran		15	.500		6	.500
Long		15	.500		6	.500
Mendez		14	.466		7	.583
Heath		14	.466		6	.500
Chappy		13	.433		8	.666
Erickson	13	.433		7	.583
Cadzilla	13	.433		5	.416
Sedgwick	12	.400		6	.500
James		 9	.300		7	.583

           <<< HBAHBA::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]POOL_95.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< POOL 95 >-
================================================================================
Note 7.41                    Miscellaneous Comments                     41 of 41
MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Some gave all"     10 lines  29-DEC-1995 10:49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Zogran         15      .500            6       .500
>Long           15      .500            6       .500

>The new standard: UMDanbillllline

	It's always good to be remembered in some way.



	billl
9.4044done pointed, too, yet, bothHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Dec 29 1995 16:4235
and maybe:

Team              Line   Wins       O/U     by
-----------------------------------------------------
San Francisco     12.5     11     Under     -2
Dallas            11.5     12      Over      0
Miami             10.5      9     Under     -2
Pittsburgh        10.5     11      Over      0
New England       10.5      6     Under     -5
Cleveland          9.5      5     Under     -5
Oakland            9.5      8     Under     -2
San Diego          9.5      9     Under     -1
Denver             8.5      8     Under     -1
Chicago            8.5      9      Over      0
Detroit            8.5     10      Over      1
Buffalo            8.5     10      Over      1
Minnesota          8.5      8     Under     -1
Green Bay          8.5     11      Over      2
NY Giants          8.5      5     Under     -4
Arizona            8.5      4     Under     -5
Philadelphia       8.5     10      Over      1
Kansas City        7.5     13      Over      5
Indianapolis       7.5      9      Over      1
Seattle            7.5      8      Over      0
Atlanta            7.5      9      Over      1
NY Jets            7.5      3     Under     -5
New Orleans        7.5      7     Under     -1
Tampa Bay          6.5      7      Over      0
Washington         6.5      6     Under     -1
Cincinnati         5.5      7      Over      1
St Louis           5.5      7      Over      1
Houston            5.5      7      Over      1
Carolina           2.5      7      Over      4
Jacksonville       2.5      4      Over      1

9.4045go figureMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Dec 29 1995 16:5910
	Duh!

	I was replying to 7.40.  For some dopey reason I
	never saw 7.39.  I was wondering what 7.40 was from.

	Boy do I feel like a dummy.



	billl
9.4046diff'rent sprotHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Dec 29 1995 17:026
Hey, not to worry.

In bridge, the dummy is at least one of the 4 smartest people at the
table.

TTom
9.4047.500 is better than the Mendoza LineODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsTue Jan 02 1996 12:258
    Hmmm. some way to ne meorialized <UMDanbillline>.  The story of my
    life, and I didn't even hit .500 in the weekly pool pickin' contest. 
    Glad I don't try to live off of my "entertainment" winnings.
    
    Oh well, they just started a "Keno" type game here in GA.  Can't do
    much worse there!
    
    UM(.500)Dan
9.4048CAM::WAYRidi pagliacioTue Jan 02 1996 12:3612
Well, we recently got Powerball here in CT.  I tried playing it.  Didn't win
anything, but there are MORE ways to win than with the regular CT Lotto.

My luck on that stuff pretty much sucks, so I don't play often.  It's like with
that scam, uh, er, deal that Bill Long ran with the "raffle".

You spend $10 on a ticket, with drawings every day of December for varying
amounts to win -- I think there were 250 tickets all told.  I didn't win a damn
thing -- except the feeling that I had contributed to a good cause....


'Saw
9.4049Shula stepping down?ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsThu Jan 04 1996 20:236
    Rumors flying out of Miami that Shula has stepped down.  Spurrier has
    been granted a one week "window" to talk with whatever pro teams are
    interested, and JJ is tanned, rested and ready.  Gonna be interesting times
    for followers of the 'Fins.
    
    UMDan
9.4050IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Jan 05 1996 11:592
It'd be great if Spurrier went to the Dolphins.  Then they could *both*
fall flat on their faces...
9.4051waiting in the wingsHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Jan 05 1996 13:359
Ever one's reporting that ol' Don is hanging up the clibboard. He's
rumored to be going upstairs for the lasted year of his contract.

Candidates for this assumed opening range from Jimmy Johnson, who's
surprisingly silent and no likely to work for the Fish while Shula's
around, to Marty Schottenheimer if'n he wins it all thised year at KC,
to Steve Spurrier who looks like he needs a little coaching hisself, etc.

TTom
9.4052all JJ has to do is say YesCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Jan 05 1996 13:408
    
    the real question you have to ask is since the Tampa bay job opened up
    and is in FLA., where JJ says he wants to stay did Mr. Blockbuster ask
    Don to step down for fear of loosing JJ to Tampa? It's my belief that
    Wayne is just letting Don step down graciously without the pink slip
    that Jerry layed on Landry........
    
    mike
9.4053could beHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Jan 05 1996 13:5513
>    the real question you have to ask is since the Tampa bay job opened up
>    and is in FLA., where JJ says he wants to stay ...

Maybe ya oughta change that to "is currently in FLA." cause in all the
rumors they're the team most likely to relocate. Rumors are out where
they'll go to Cleveland and/or LA. I like the Cleveland one where the
Browns go to Baltimore, change their names to the Crabs or something in
that ilk and the Bucs move to Cleveland and become the Browns.

But the question about the timing of Shula's new assignment is something
that begs for a_answer.

TTom
9.4054OLD1S::CADZILLA2My python boot is to tightFri Jan 05 1996 14:076
    
    Given that both the Florida teams need a coach, I would expect JJ to
    take the Miami job if he's going to take one. Tampa has always sucked 
    and the owner won't put up the bucks to build a JJ type of team. Miami
    has some talent, but needs someone to fire them up.  Both would be a
    challenge, but Miami would be the smart choice. 
9.4055Why we hate the Cowboys part 934596798CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Jan 05 1996 14:109
    
    Just so I can say I told ya, Philly will crush Dallas this weekend.
    Ray Rhodes is a genuis. Philly's defense will eliminate Emitt early
    after that it's game set match to the Eagles............
    
    It'll be nice to see Troy boy eat some carpet this weekend and of
    course most all Michael Irvin humilated and crying.......
    
    mike
9.4056Don't count on it, MikeyAKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustFri Jan 05 1996 14:205
    Mikey, just when I thought you had joined the sports cognoscenti with
    your Camby statement you do this.  I did take the 14 points but I fear
    a massacre is in the making down in Dallas.
    
    Wonder what the Sports Babe and her babies are saying about this one.
9.4057CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Jan 05 1996 14:318
    
    not to worry Bill repeat after me "Barry" "Barry" "Barry"!!!!
    
    sure dallas has the athlete's but they don't have the heart or the
    desire. They've proven time and time again this year by thinking
    they can just show up and win. Ain't going to happen this sunday!
    
    mike
9.4058OLD1S::CADZILLA2My python boot is to tightFri Jan 05 1996 14:397
    
    MikeyC.
    
     The Boy's will win despite BS's mistakes. The 20-17 loss in Philly had
    no bearing on their future. They had lost HFA to the 9er's and had
    already made the playoff's. The desire to show the league the can win 
    with BS will come through on Sunday. 
9.4059WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Jan 05 1996 14:586
    
    The winners this weekend will be:
    
       Bills, Packers, Eagles, and Colts.
    
    - Sean
9.4060CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Jan 05 1996 14:5812
    
    That loss is exactly why they'll loose again or do you forget the
    Redskins' so soon? Barry will try to go macho macho after the loss
    for revenge and get nailed. Philly has the cofidence, has the coach
    and has a good core of experienced players who either been there
    before or are dam hungry to get there. 
    
    Your attitude about the loss Cad is the same kind of flippant 
    attitude that I expect those arrognant sob cowpokes to have and
    that my friend will be their downfall.......
    
    mike
9.4061FWIW, IMO, BTWHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Jan 05 1996 15:0217
>    The winners this weekend will be:
>    
>       Bills, Packers, Eagles, and Colts.

Exactly whatta ya mean by "winners"? Straight up? I think we got
ourselves a little teaser here ;=).

Straight up, I see ever one of these losing but the Packers winning
wouldn't surprise me. No way Dallas loses the game to da Iggles, Barry
Switzer notwithstanding.

KC will show their mainliness and whoops them Colts with their guy Zack,
who aint exactly shown that he can do it 2 games in a row.

Steelhaids win, pretty easy.

TTom
9.4062OLD1S::CADZILLA2My python boot is to tightFri Jan 05 1996 15:077
    
    
    They have that attitude because they know they are better than the
    Eagles. All that fire they had in Philly won't mean squat when they
    show up in Texas Stadium.  
    
    Is there interest in a one week p-name bet on this Mikey? 
9.4063CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Jan 05 1996 15:382
    
    maybe let me think about it....
9.4064WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Jan 05 1996 15:4713
    
> >    The winners this weekend will be:
> >    
> >       Bills, Packers, Eagles, and Colts.
> 
> Exactly whatta ya mean by "winners"? Straight up?
    
    Yeah, no spread crap.  The only one's I'm not highly confident
    about are the Packers and to a lesser extent, the Bills.  Indy/Philly 
    are locks, though.
    
    - Sean
    
9.4065OLD1S::CADZILLA2My python boot is to tightFri Jan 05 1996 15:496
    
    
    Mike,
    
     If I do not respond later it's because I'm off this after noon. I'll
    be outahere in 10 mins.
9.4066USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jan 05 1996 16:4217
>    Given that both the Florida teams need a coach, I would expect JJ to
>    take the Miami job if he's going to take one. Tampa has always sucked 
>    and the owner won't put up the bucks to build a JJ type of team. Miami
>    has some talent, but needs someone to fire them up.  Both would be a
>    challenge, but Miami would be the smart choice. 

Tampa's got a new owner, so we don't know if he's willing to spend
money.  That's immaterial, 'cause Johnson has said many times that
if he comes back he WON'T buy free agents...he'll build through the
draft.

I read just this week that JJ has been looking at TB more closely and
likes their young talent (ie: they're already headed in the direction
he would want to go), although he don't like that wuss Dilfer.  But,
I'm sure Ind will have to dump Erickson's salary now that Harbaugh
is the next Johnny U, so JJ can probably get Erickson back (and not
have to give the Colts their 1st-round pick back).
9.4067MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Jan 05 1996 16:536
	Yabbut, if'n the Bucs are rumored to be headed to
	Cleveland "The Land of Burning Rivers", do you really
	think JJ would be interested?


	billl
9.4068NQOS01::nqsrv406.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYFri Jan 05 1996 16:584
Hey Cad, can I make that pname bet wif ya?

brews
9.4069You've got to be kidding?FABSIX::D_HORTERTSat Jan 06 1996 02:2815
    re. 4059
    
    Bills, Packers, Eagles, and Colts as straight up winners?????!!!!
    
    Even with the spread you would be lucky to win 2 out of 4.  I do hope
    you are right about the Eagles and Packers though.  I would love to see
    all of the prognasticators eat crow over the fact that the NFC
    championship game includes neither Dallas nor San Francisco when
    according to all of them it was a foregone conclusion that the NFC
    championship game would be Dallas vs. San Francisco and the winner of
    that game would beat anyone the AFC could send to the Super Bowl.
    To honestly believe that is going to happen, however, would make me
    a dreamer beyond reality.
    
                                                        D.J. 
9.4070WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Jan 08 1996 00:3413
    
    > Bills, Packers, Eagles, and Colts as straight up winners?????!!!!
    > 
    > Even with the spread you would be lucky to win 2 out of 4. 
    
    Oh well, I only hit 2/4, but I still didn't need the spread.  The 
    Bills were a disappointment, but I was worried about that pick.  The
    Eagles I just blew.  Man, did they lay down and die - very sad.
    
    Go Colts!
    
    
    
9.4071din't matterHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedMon Jan 08 1996 14:264
In any case, the spread/line din't matter. 2 favorites covered and 2 dogs
won outright.

TTom
9.4072Can The Pack Do It???LUDWIG::BARBIERITue Jan 09 1996 14:396
      OK, so what do you guys think of the Packer/Cowboy matchup?
    
      The Packer/49'er game was perhaps my most satisfying sports
      watching moment in the last 26 years.
    
    						Tony
9.4073NQOS01::16.65.128.163::may_brBRUCE MAYTue Jan 09 1996 14:432
You've had a tough 26 years, Tony.  8^)
9.4074BIGQ::MCKAYTue Jan 09 1996 15:203
    Tony you have to get cable!
    
    Jimbo
9.4075bigHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 09 1996 15:347
>      OK, so what do you guys think of the Packer/Cowboy matchup?

Dallas, big.

FWIW, Pittsburgh, big, too, also, yet, again.

TTom
9.4076YupLUDWIG::BARBIERITue Jan 09 1996 16:235
    re: .4073
    
    Its been UGLY!!!    ;-)
    
    					Tony
9.4077CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Jan 09 1996 19:099
    
    I think if the Packers can keep it close they can win it in the 4th
    quarter. I hope they blow doors off of dallas. I hope that the Packers
    defense will attack Deon when he plays offense instead of standing
    there in awe of him like Maluala did when he had him dead to right.
    
    biggest obstacles I see are the homecooking, Aikman and Smith....
    
    mike
9.4078I have my WIFE's method of picking teams ??? ARGH !!!MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Jan 10 1996 18:127
    INDY OVER KC.. WHAT HAPPEND ???  If Indy beats Pittsburg it could
    be a very LONG day for the AFC in the BOWL (Why should this year
    be any different).  Worst thing is I have to listen to my wife, whe
    once again has OUTDONE me in the PREDICTIONS.. Of course she has
    Indy VS GB in the Superbowl I had KC vs Dallas in the Bowl...
    
    								MaB
9.4079SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jan 11 1996 13:1113
RE                 <<< Note 9.4078 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>

>    INDY OVER KC.. WHAT HAPPEND ???  

    The Indian war was a bloody dread
    No one thought the Colts would even cover the spread
    The Chiefs were to repeat Super Bowl III
    but their season found it's end at 14 and 3.

    Zack-ry, Zack-ry, Crocket
    King of the NFL

  George
9.4080MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonThu Jan 11 1996 15:147
.    The Indian war was a bloody dread
.    No one thought the Colts would even cover the spread
.    The Chiefs were to repeat Super Bowl III
.    but their season found it's end at 14 and 3.


     Except it was 13-4, George.
9.4081Poetic LicenseSLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jan 11 1996 15:203
  But III and 4 don't rhyme.

  George
9.4082MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonThu Jan 11 1996 15:223
	No fooling.  

	(BTW, George, KC won SB IV, the Jets SB III.  HTH.)
9.4083MSBCS::BRYDIEMy kingdom for K.Greene's locksThu Jan 11 1996 15:252
    
      Your poetic license is hereby revoked.
9.4084GO PACK!!LUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Jan 11 1996 16:395
    re: .4078
    
    I sure hope your wife is right!
    
    					Tony
9.4085WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Jan 11 1996 17:133
    
    Oh, don't worry.  Garonteed GB/Indy Super Bowl.  
    
9.4086OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jan 11 1996 17:242
9.4087OLD1S::CADZILLA2Jus scuttle buttin with StevieRayThu Jan 11 1996 17:264
    
    
    Todays local rag indicated that Jimmy Johnson will be named the
    Dolphins coach at a 2:00 edt press conference. 
9.4088SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jan 11 1996 17:4622
  This notes file is probably the only place where you can tell a joke and
someone complains that the punch line is technically incorrect. I can just
imagine what you guy were like watching Disney's Davy Crocket. 

    Born on a mountain top in Tennessee
    Green-ist state in the land of the free
    Raised in the woods sos he knew every tree
    Killed him a b'ar, when he was only three

/nasal tone on
  That's not right Tennessee is not as green as New York and there's no way a
  three year old kid could kill a bear and besiiiiiiids you said it wrong you
  said bar not bear ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha, you don't know what you are talking
  about.
/nasal tone off

  For you techno-wennie-nerds who need the joke explained, Superbowl III is
correct since a Chiefs win over the Cowboys or 49'ers in Superbowl XXX would
have been an upset like Joe Willie's upset over the Colts. The Chiefs win in
Superbowl IV was not as much of a surprise. 

  George
9.4089CAM::WAYRidi pagliaccioThu Jan 11 1996 17:511
No flies on you, George.
9.4090MSBCS::BRYDIEMy kingdom for K.Greene's locksThu Jan 11 1996 18:0910
    
    >> This notes file is probably the only place where you can tell 
    >> a joke and someone complains that the punch line is technically 
    >> incorrect. 
    
       How about if we just say that your poetry sucks. Really it does.
       Completely. Never mind that's technically incorrect. It's also
       arhythmic and puerile.
    
    
9.4091GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Thu Jan 11 1996 18:445
    
    	Hey!  No fair writing replies that contain words I gotta
    	look up in the dictionary....
    
    Claybone
9.4092Soooeee piiigggggOLD1S::CADZILLA2Jus scuttle buttin with StevieRayThu Jan 11 1996 18:501
    
9.4093SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jan 11 1996 18:5910
RE     <<< Note 9.4090 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "My kingdom for K.Greene's locks" >>>

>       How about if we just say that your poetry sucks. Really it does.
>       Completely. Never mind that's technically incorrect. It's also
>       arhythmic and puerile.
    
  Woooo Tommy, deep. Not the dog pissing on a tree type note you usually write,
this is Mr. Peabody pissing on the Way Back machine.

  George
9.4094Rules of doggerel?\AKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustThu Jan 11 1996 19:0416
    I think poetic license allows one to be generally inaccurate but not
    specifically inaccurate.  George you made a specific statement as with
    3 losses vs 4, sbIII vs sbIV.  Contrast this to the poetic license of
    55.175
    
    The system hardly ever failed the pretty boys in blue.
    Hell, hadn't Snuffy managed out of 30 tries to win a ring or two?
    
    or 
    
    And lo the general stole the ball and when he layed it in
    The Celts had slipped a point ahead, 40 seconds from the win.
    
    Smith has not quite had 30 seasons not in McHale's last game was it
    necessarily 40 seconds vs 45.  However Snuffy was at the game and the
    Celtics did have a 1 point lead under a minute to play.
9.4095You've got to be kidding???FABSIX::D_HORTERTFri Jan 12 1996 09:068
    re .4085
    
    I hope that when Pittsburgh and Dallas win this weekend, that you will
    apologize to all the noters in this conference for that outrageous
    "guarantee" that you so easily made.  Especially to all Pittsburgh
    fans since your picking an 11 pt. underdog, visiting, dome team.
    
                                                          D.J.
9.4096btw, spread has zero to do with who Vegas thinks is betterWONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Jan 12 1996 11:1911
    
    You want me to "apologize" to Steeler fans for disagreeing with Las 
    Vegas?  
    
    Hmmmm...  I'd say it's doubtful they'd apologize to me for being 
    right if'n the Steelers end up losing like I predicted.
    
    Tell you what, though, if I'm wrong, I'll promise to eat lots of 
    crow, and post a hearty "Congrats" to all you Steeler fans.
    
    - Sean
9.4097CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Jan 12 1996 13:125
    
    Well for those that might be in a cave somewhere, Jimmy Johnson has
    signed on as the new Dolphins' coach. 2 million a year for 4 years.
    
    mike
9.40984th down, O'Donnell throws, ball knocked down, Steelers lose !"USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jan 12 1996 13:5812
>    Well for those that might be in a cave somewhere, Jimmy Johnson has
>    signed on as the new Dolphins' coach. 2 million a year for 4 years.

Bill Parcells' job just got "|----------T H I S   M U C H----------|"
tougher !



re:  Pittsburgh fans

Is it me, or does anyone else think that Steelers fans are the most
SENSITIVE about anything even remotely negative about their team ???
9.4099MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Jan 12 1996 14:099
>Is it me, or does anyone else think that Steelers fans are the most
>SENSITIVE about anything even remotely negative about their team ???


	It's you.



	billl
9.4100Why just four years?MSBCS::BRYDIEMy kingdom for K.Greene's locksFri Jan 12 1996 14:1111
9.4101USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jan 12 1996 14:157
>     KC notched 13 wins this year and all it got 
>     them was a shorter ride home after they got knocked out of the playoffs.

KC proved what I (and most) thought all year long --> they weren't as
good as their record.  Too many "lucky", improbable wins.

The Shottenheimer Factor is another discussion.
9.4102MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonFri Jan 12 1996 14:222
	Kinda like the Browns proved they weren't as good as their
	record last year might have suggested for this year.
9.4103MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Jan 12 1996 14:2210
	I'm not convinved that "luck" and "ability to create
	situations" in the NFL is mutually exclusive.  By that
	I mean that if team A plays agressive defense causing
	team B to fumble/throw interceptions, I see that as 
	team B being "able to create situations".  It would
	appear that others in here would call team B "lucky".]


	
	billl
9.4104EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Jan 12 1996 14:2529
    
>     Pittsburg hasn't had the offense to be even an AFC champion and I ain't 
>     so sure they have it now regardless of some bogus stats. 
    
    So you like Indy to win outright?  Make the prediction.  Really, it
    doesn't take _that_ much to be an "AFC Champion" anyway; I recognize 
    that.  It's just Pittsburgh's turn, and one thing I do like is that 
    if it is their turn this season, it's a better year to have that 
    chance than when JJ was at the helm of the Cowboys, or when any 
    San Fran team has been in.  Not a lot better but a little.
    
    Honest question, Tommy: if the Steelers are in are you going to 
    convince yourself again that the AFC team has an honest chance and 
    take the points for the Nth straight year?  My guess is no.  But 
    I know that you even liked that joke of a Chargers team against 
    the 49ers last year.  So when I look at your assessment of a team
    like the Steelers which at the very least will show up with a solid 
    defense, against the backdrop of your recent faith in the AFC 
    champion, I just don't get it.  No offense, but I just don't.
    
    I'm not sensitive about the Steelers in general.  I have flat-out
    admitted that they have been Chokers with the capital C in recent
    playoffs (I'm not blaming the refs and whining about bad luck; it's
    been their own undoing).  Others have argued that they're just not 
    that good.  All are in full agreement that the final accomplishment 
    has not been enough; the "dispute" is over why.
    
    glenn
    
9.4105SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jan 12 1996 14:4420
RE                     <<< Note 9.4104 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>

>    So you like Indy to win outright?  Make the prediction.  

  I'll take you up on that. I really like this Zack Crocket kid so I'm going
to jump on the Colts band wagon and predict the Colts as AFC Champs.

  It will be fun and besides, if the Colts win then I can write more Davey
Crocket verses. It's destiny. Crocket, beating up Indians (Chiefs) thriving in
the East, and headed for his destiny with a team from Texas. 

    The Colts beat the Chiefs it was a major surprise
    Arrow Head stadium has no more dry eyes
    Now their off to Pittsburgh where the steal curtain lies
    to play the black and gold for the AFC prize.

    Zak-ry, Zak-ry Crocket
    Runn'en on borrowed time.

  George
9.4106MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonFri Jan 12 1996 15:035
	George, Crockett had one good game against San Diego.  He didn't
	have a good game against KC, and won't against Pittsburgh.

	Harbaugh might, however.  I think Indy will lose outright, but will
	cover the spread.  Same for GB, cover but lose.
9.4107MSBCS::BRYDIEMy kingdom for K.Greene's locksFri Jan 12 1996 15:1129
9.4108SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jan 12 1996 15:4812
RE    <<< Note 9.4106 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R "NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon" >>>

>	George, Crockett had one good game against San Diego.  He didn't
>	have a good game against KC, and won't against Pittsburgh.

  Well Davey Crockett didn't have that great a career either. He fought part
of a war against the Creek Indians, served a term as a back bencher in
Congress then showed up at the Alamo in time to get himself killed. But
reality is not what's important here. It's the legend which grows from the
songs that are written. By the time I'm finished, he'll be the NFL's MVP.

  George
9.4109Even Crockett, Davy, had to occasionally shoot a moving targetEDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Jan 12 1996 16:0014
    Notably unmentioned throughout the spread of this "Legend of Zack'ry 
    Crockett" the week after his big game against the Chargers was the
    fact that on those TD runs he was just pretty much motoring straight 
    ahead, maybe breaking one tackle at the line of scrimmage but
    otherwise totally unimpeded by any opposition other than his own
    fear of the goalline.  Now granted, that says something about the 
    Colts' O-line, and yes, Crockett deserves some credit for his speed 
    for a well-built back, but the conclusion here is not to expect it to 
    happen again.  As in ever, not just against the Steelers.  I think 
    we're talking Timmy Smith, 'cept Crockett has a better name.
    
    glenn
    
9.4110SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jan 12 1996 16:064
  I wonder if he'll put a tail on his helmet and start calling the football
Ol' Betsy.

  George
9.4111There's fluke, and then there's fluke...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Jan 12 1996 16:0920
    
>     That joke of a team went into Three Rivers last year and won the AFC
>     title game against the team that has "the most wins in the AFC in the 
>     last four years" trophy.
    
    So what.  The breakdowns Pittsburgh suffered are well-documented
    (from this past Monday's USA Today: "In the AFC title match, the
    Steelers outplayed and dominated the Chargers but lost 17-13 when
    they failed to come up with the knockout punch and allowed 
    backbreaking plays").  It's not a strong enough argument against 
    the Steelers, for the Chargers.  What you've said is that last 
    year the Chargers were legit because they did in fact win the AFC.  
    Therefore, if the Steelers do so this year they should be regarded
    in at least the same esteem (imo much more so though), but instead 
    you consider them to be a fraud.
    
    Ah, what the hell, let the games be played...
    
    glenn
    
9.4112MSBCS::BRYDIEMy kingdom for K.Greene's locksFri Jan 12 1996 18:5320
    
  >> So what.  The breakdowns Pittsburgh suffered are well-documented
    
     The Patsies suffered some of the same sort of breakdowns when they
     played the Steelers this year in a game that we had many an opport-
     unity to win and really should have. We didn't win and it wasn't 
     because Pittsburgh got lucky. It's as simple as talented well-coached 
     teams don't make the kind of errors that we did against Pittsburgh or 
     that Pittsburgh did against SD. If you were good enough to win you 
     would have. You didn't. Pittsburgh has been lucky this year in that 
     they faced Buffalo when Buffalo didn't have their best player and now 
     they face Indy when they don't have Faulk who is arguably their best
     player. No matter. Pittsburgh's overrated defense if vulnerable right
     up the gut and Marchibroda knows it. The Colts defense led by big
     Tony Siragusa isn't going to be pushed around like Buffalo was.
     The comparison between the Bucs and the Steelers not getting to the
     championship is a valid one. In each case there's been a better 
     team in front of you. This time for the Steelers it's Indy. Indy
     wins a grinding game 14-10.   
    
9.4113MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Jan 12 1996 19:177
> Indy wins a grinding game 14-10.   

	I suspect you'll be dining on some over-cooked, garbage-
	eatin' crow come Monday, Tommy.


	billl
9.4114CHEFS::7A1_GRNKeep the blue flag flyingMon Jan 15 1996 07:216
    20-16
    
    Any orders for humble pie lads?
    
    
    CHARLEY
9.4115SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jan 15 1996 11:2110
  Wow, what a finish. A Colt receiver had the winning hail Mary pass in his lap
and his hands almost on it but seemed to throw his hands away from the ball and
let it hit the ground before grabbing it. It was that close, one contracted arm
muscle and the Colts would be going to the superbowl. 

  What a game!

  No more Davy Crockett songs, Zack's demise had nothing to do with Texas.

  George
9.4116WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Jan 15 1996 11:275
    
    I don't think the missed Hail Mary was the end of the game.  Coryatt's 
    dropped interception sealed this one.  He keeps that in his hands, and
    the Colts are going to Tempe.
    
9.4117SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jan 15 1996 11:4115
  Actually I saw three potential game ending catches dropped. The Colts missed
an interception that could have ended it, then a few minutes later after
scoring the Steelers missed an interception that could have ended it, then the
dropped Hail Mary pass. 

  In a way it was like that Miami/K.C. Christmas game back in the early 70's
when Steneru for K.C. missed two chances to kick a game winning sudden death
field goal before Yapremmian finally made the kick.

  Great finish. Now if only they could figure out how to have Superbowls like
that. Maybe they do need to seed the Superbowl tourney without regard to
Conferences. There would still be the occasional blow out but it would probably
mean more close Superbowls.

  George
9.4118CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Jan 15 1996 11:469
    
    for starters they could start by not worrying about almighty
    merchandising buck and call a Dallas game fair and square. I
    was absolutely disgusted with the crap they let Dallas get away
    with yesterday. I watch golf instead because the outcome was
    inevivatable. Dallas fans remind of UConn fans, they get 75% of
    all the calls and still whine about the other 25%....
    
    mike
9.4119CAM::WAYA fig-bar of my imaginationMon Jan 15 1996 12:034
>    inevivatable. Dallas fans remind of UConn fans, they get 75% of
>    all the calls and still whine about the other 25%....
    
That's funny.  Dallas fans remind ME of GEORGETOWN fans.....8^)
9.4120HOW BOUT THEM COWBOYSSTRATA::GARRYMon Jan 15 1996 12:0612
    Mike I take it your grapes are tasting awful SOUR this morning. hahaha
    
    You need to take your ANTI Dallas glasses off....both teams were 
    getting away with murder.
    
    And another thing..stop acting like Magoo and give Barry Switzer his
    due...he proved to the whole world he knows his football...the guy
    is a genius..since he outcoached in your mind 2 genius's Rhodes and 
    Holmgren
    
    
    Tom
9.4121MIMS::ROLLINS_RNCAA Baseball in less 2 weeksMon Jan 15 1996 13:3218
>    And another thing..stop acting like Magoo and give Barry Switzer his
>    due...he proved to the whole world he knows his football...the guy
>    is a genius..since he outcoached in your mind 2 genius's Rhodes and 
>    Holmgren

     Dallas has a great collection of players, both on the line and at the
     skill positions.  They have much more talent than anyone in football.
     Interestingly enough, when the NFL listed how much each team spent on
     salaries and bonuses this past year, Dallas spent over $60 million,
     while the second place team spent $43 million.  (Remember, salary cap was
     $38 million this year.)

     Barry Switzer is not a football genius.  Geez, I am smart enough to
     tell the Cowboys to run Emmitt Smith behind that huge line.  The wonder
     is that Dallas can't beat San Fransisco, not that they always beat
     everyone else.

     
9.4122Switzer > JohnsonLUDWIG::GARRYMon Jan 15 1996 13:5512
    
    The point I am trying to make to Mike is...when Dallas loses its
    Switzers fault,when Dallas wins he has nothing to do with it,what 
    gives,when they lose why blame the coach ????? They won and beat 
    supposed superior head coaches....give Barry credit.
    
    Philly and GB have loads of talent too.......hell GB had the MVP
    but Barry is gonna get his players another SB ring...give the guy
    some credit.
    
    
    Tom
9.4123CAM::WAYA fig-bar of my imaginationMon Jan 15 1996 14:1420
>                             -< Switzer > Johnson >-


I'm no Cowboys fan but I'll tell you right now, this is baloney.

Dallas wins in spite of Switzer, mainly because of the talent that
Jimmy Johnson packed the team with.

Switzer walked into a dream -- a proven, talent-laden team, that knows
how to win.  The first year there, he couldn't get them to the Super Bowl.
This year they're going in spite of Switzer.

JMHO, but don't expect us to believe Switzer is better than Johnson.
Not by a long shot.

    
    



9.4124LUDWIG::GARRYMon Jan 15 1996 14:277
    
    Lets not forget last year Dallas was beat up real bad...Emmitt was 
    30 % and Williams was out with the car accident..yet Switzer still
    took Dallas to the NFC championship game last year and almost won,
    the guy knows the game of football.
    
    Tom
9.4125Switzer did it, Seiffort didn'tAKOCOA::BREENMon Jan 15 1996 14:3612
    Switzer seems to make up in motivational technique what he may lack in
    terms of Jimmy Johnson efficiency.  Keeping that collection of high
    priced talent motivated and focused is not easy and you could see
    yesterday the Cowboys had a big letdown from the Philly win.
    
    Dallas may have a big overconfidence problem with Pitt and the 17
    points (my guess) spread won't make it any easier.  Deion and his
    antics and the beating his internal people took the last two weeks add
    to his problems.
    
    And of course simply winning won't be enough, he has to win big to
    satisfy his critics.
9.4126GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Mon Jan 15 1996 15:2714
    Dallas once again got the advantage of every close call, and some that
    weren't very close. The crackback by Williams was a dirty play, even if
    it was legal (which is debatable). There were several pass interferance
    calls that were bogus. Williams and Newton were constantly (like almost
    every play) going to the facemask to keep out the Packers DL. All I can
    assume is that there are totally incompetent officials who cannot see a
    freaking thing on the interior line play. I'm not sure that the Packers
    would have won with a straight up game, but it would have been a hell
    of a lot closer. 
    
    I really like the fact that after the game, Reggie White said what
    needed to be said and blasted the refs big time. The Philadelphia Daily
    News has a piece today on his comments, basically saying that there is
    a pattern of illegal tactics by the Cowbou OL. 
9.4127GIVE THE MAN HIS DUELUDWIG::GARRYMon Jan 15 1996 15:5813
    
    Lets face it,All ref suc* in all sports....Lets stop crying and
    admit the best team in football WON again like they will in 2 weeks.
    I believe Michael IRVIN said it best"WE ARE GOING HOME GIVE THE MAN HIS DUE"
    He has taken enough Shi* from you guys(The Media).
    
                 How about them COWBOY'S  
                  Tom
    
    
     P.S. How many years to the NFC championship game????
    
          How maNy times in the last 4 years to the BIG SHOW???
9.4128CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downMon Jan 15 1996 16:179
Tom, you sound just like an old Soviet propaganda machine.

No one is denying that the Cowboys have talent.  Game 1 against my Giants
proved that, no sweat.

But the Cowboys have gotten just as much home cookin' from the refs this
season as the Bulls do.


9.4129Would you like some cheese with that whine?CSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Mon Jan 15 1996 16:2817
>>           <<< Note 9.4126 by GRANPA::DFAUST "Bad Things, man..." >>>
>>
>>    Dallas once again got the advantage of every close call, and some that

Quit whining.  I saw plays in which the Packer's O-line were going to
the face, too, and they didn't get called.  The refs were letting 'em
play, and the Cowboys just played better than the Packers.

As for pass interference calls, I only remember 2, and they both looked
legit to me.  Hell, one of them was more of a mugging than interference,
and it was declined because Irvin made a great catch.

According to Tom Jackson on ESPN, the hit that took Jurkovic out was
legal.  His words, not mine.  But I don't suppose that means anything
here.

Jerry
9.4130It's that time of year: sickened by winner's anticsEDWIN::WAUGAMANPittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl!Mon Jan 15 1996 17:0110
    
    Michael Irvin may be the biggest punk in football.  He's far more
    detestable than Deion.  Deion, I can actually get a chuckle from
    him.  Irvin's gone back to dancing fantastic after the successful
    6-yard square-out.  Here's hoping that it was something in the 
    water in Arizona and that the Steeler DBs can do unto Irvin as was 
    done unto Irvin by Penn State in the 1987 Fiesta Bowl.
    
    glenn
    
9.4131SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jan 15 1996 17:067
  Weird thing about Dieon is that one time during the game he started doing his
dance while he still had a defender between him and the goal. Now that's
confidence. Can't say I've ever seen that one before.

  Maybe he was trying to fake the guy out but the defender didn't go for it. 

  George
9.4132USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jan 15 1996 17:329
>As for pass interference calls, I only remember 2, and they both looked
>legit to me.  Hell, one of them was more of a mugging than interference,
>and it was declined because Irvin made a great catch.

Jerry, I hope you're not talking about the call on that last Dallas TD drive
after Favre threw the INT.  There's no way Teague interfered with Irvin.
The way I saw it Irvin had his arms around Teague's head (Teague didn't
know where the ball was) as he caught the ball.  No way that's defensive
interference.
9.4133That's the oneCSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Mon Jan 15 1996 17:4222
>>Jerry, I hope you're not talking about the call on that last Dallas TD drive
>>after Favre threw the INT.  There's no way Teague interfered with Irvin.
>>The way I saw it Irvin had his arms around Teague's head (Teague didn't
>>know where the ball was) as he caught the ball.  No way that's defensive
>>interference.

Yeah, Garb, that's one of them.  The way I saw it, Irvin was trying to
catch the ball, and Teague was interfering.  By your own admission,
Teague didn't know where the ball was, and he definitely had his
back to the ball.  And it sure looked like he was making contact.

No way that's NOT defensive interference.

I'll admit that Irvin has benefitted on some questionable inteference
calls, but that wasn't one of them.  If Teague had been turned around
and at least given the impression of going for the ball, I might agree
with you.

Do you consider it incidental contact and a non-foul, or offensive interference?
Just curious.

Jerry
9.4134CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downMon Jan 15 1996 17:5112
I didn't see the play in question.

Now, with that out of the way, even if it was defensive interference, the
non-call was owed to Teague.  Watch Irvin and 90 percent of the time he
pushes off.

Mr "Gotta Dance" pushes off more than any other WR in the league.  I've
heard Madden and other CCs comment on it quite often.


Just a_observation,
'Saw
9.4135MIMS::ROLLINS_RNCAA Baseball in less 2 weeksMon Jan 15 1996 17:517
> Yeah, Garb, that's one of them.  The way I saw it, Irvin was trying to
> catch the ball, and Teague was interfering.  By your own admission,
> Teague didn't know where the ball was, and he definitely had his
> back to the ball.  And it sure looked like he was making contact.

  Teague was looking right at the ball, as Irvin had his arms wrapped around
  his head.
9.4136CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downMon Jan 15 1996 17:526
>  Teague was looking right at the ball, as Irvin had his arms wrapped around
>  his head.


Maybe Irvin wanted to smooch him 8^)

9.4137right now I'd rather talk about flowersCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Jan 15 1996 17:549
    
    change the subject. The Cowboys won. THe Cowboys suck! They ruined
    yesterday for me, please stop them from ruining today for me.....
    
    thank you very little
    
    mike
    
    ;^)
9.4138MIMS::ROLLINS_RNCAA Baseball in less 2 weeksMon Jan 15 1996 17:5812
>             <<< Note 9.4137 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Washing Machine" >>>
>                  -< right now I'd rather talk about flowers >-
>
>    
>    change the subject. The Cowboys won. THe Cowboys suck! They ruined
>    yesterday for me, please stop them from ruining today for me.....


     Wasn't there a guy named Richmond Flowers you used to play for the
     Cowboys ?  Or am I thinking of someone else ?

     HTH :^)
9.4139yes he played for them in early 70'sOLD1S::CADZILLA2Field Service Tool PusherMon Jan 15 1996 18:012
    
    
9.4140SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jan 15 1996 18:029
  What the heck is the matter with Fox. I watched the entire game and only saw
1/2 of 1 Dallas Cowboy's Cheerleader. 

  I've got to say I'm really disappointed. When I heard Fox was going to take
over football I thought they'd lift the band but I guess it's not going to
happen. Maybe it's something to do with most of the crew coming over from CBS
and old habits dieing hard. 

  George
9.4141AKOCOA::BREENMon Jan 15 1996 18:203
    Flowers was the subject of a tv hbo style docu-drama.  His father was a
    Tennessee DA during the integration crises and Flowers was a star in
    high school not only in football but was a world class hurdler.
9.4142USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jan 15 1996 18:534
>Do you consider it incidental contact and a non-foul, or offensive interference?
>Just curious.

Jerry, given the situation, I expect a non-call at the very least.
9.4143CSLALL::BRULEcountry in need of a leaderMon Jan 15 1996 18:575
    Not to mention the non pick call when Novacek blocked the CB on the 3rd
    and 9 play and Sanders picked up the first down on Dallas' first TD
    drive. 
    
    Mike
9.4144Did someone ask? ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANPittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl!Mon Jan 15 1996 19:0217
>    Flowers was the subject of a tv hbo style docu-drama.  His father was a
>    Tennessee DA during the integration crises and Flowers was a star in
>    high school not only in football but was a world class hurdler.
    
    Pretty good movie, I thought.  All true too.  Flowers' father was
    actually the Alabama DA (wanna bet?) who tried a couple very hot
    civil rights movement murder cases, and became a hated man.  So
    Richmond Jr. basically said, bleep you, 'bama, I'm going to go play 
    my football for Tennessee and come back to beat you.  They did once, 
    too, in a big upset.  Flowers also overcame some kind of crippling 
    childhood disability that left him unable to walk on his own, 
    until after rehab (a la Gump, Glenn Cunningham, some others too 
    I suppose).
    
    glenn
    
9.4145GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Mon Jan 15 1996 19:0435
    I didn't see where anybody said the Cowboys weren't the better team
    yesterday. I have seen all of the Cowboy apologists say that the team
    from Dallas doesn't cheat, which is incorrect.
    
    OOn the drive that set up the first TD, an illegal pick was the big
    play on the scoring drive. This was (an is) cheating.
    
    All day, on virtually every play, Williams was going to the face of
    Reggie White. It was pointed out to the official responsible for making
    that call in the first quarter, who still did not call it, even though
    it was plainly visible the entire game. That official is either
    incompetent or corrupt, and I can't tell which is the case.
    
    I did not say that the crackback block was an illegal play, I said it
    was a dirty play. Anyone who has ever played on the OL will tell you
    that pplays like that have no place in football. It was the action of a
    dirty lowdown punk who shouldn't be playing, if those are the types of
    tactics he uses. Williams has, for the last two weeks, been using shots
    to the head and facemask as part of his normal blocking schemes. A
    fitting punishment might be for Mr. Lloyd and Mr. Greene from
    Pittsburgh to stand him up while another steeler comes in from the side
    and blow out his knee. From my understanding that would be perfectly
    within the rules, as well.
    
    The first pass interference call was bogus, as the Cowboy ran into the
    Packer defender who was standing on the field waiting for the receiver
    to cut. That also set up a TD, as I recall.
    
    The officiating gave Dallas a huge advantage in momentum and had a
    great deal to do with the way Dallas ran the ball, considering the
    illegal tactics that Williams and Newton employ. I still think that
    Dallas would have won, but it would be nice if they had to play ny NFL
    rules, not WWF rules as they used yesterday.
    
     
9.4146USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jan 15 1996 19:056
Hey, the established team gets the calls.  There's nothing new about that.

Green Bay needs a speedster out of the backfield to give defenses something
to watch for.  It's the only glaring weakness I see.  Next year they have
to care games they should win (St. Louis, Tampa Bay) and maybe they can
get Dallas up in GB in the playoffs.
9.4147OLD1S::CADZILLA2Field Service Tool PusherMon Jan 15 1996 19:075
    
    
    That Pick bs is a joke. The guy defending Novacheck ran him into the
    other guy. The did the same against the 9er's last week. I would guess
    the Cowboys saw that and made up a play to defeat the defensive ploy.
9.4148GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Mon Jan 15 1996 19:094
    How's that go? The defender sets the pattern? I don't think so. Try a
    different lie to cover up the cheating of the Dallas Cowboys.
    
    
9.4149OLD1S::CADZILLA2Field Service Tool PusherMon Jan 15 1996 19:123
    
    
    Take that lying shit and stuff it. 
9.4150Don't complain about morals in a morality play...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl!Mon Jan 15 1996 19:1310
    Dallas has always cheated and, quite likely, always will.  The 
    minute things got a bit clean, who enters the scene but Whitewater
    Jerry Jones.  I thought everyone knew that and that it was just an 
    accepted part of the game that just must be overcome.  Stop whining,
    Packers fans.  Like it oughta be, it's Steelers-Cowboys III in Super 
    Bowl XXX, Good versus Evil, with Good wearing black...
    
    glenn
    
9.4151GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Mon Jan 15 1996 19:166
    re: .9149
    
    I would if you Cowboy fans would come out of denial about the cheating
    Cowboys.... The entire country saw it pointed out to them consistantly
    yesterday and you folks cannot take the heat. Tough toenails!
    
9.4152MIMS::ROLLINS_RNCAA Baseball in less 2 weeksMon Jan 15 1996 19:226
	Well, I think the Cowboys won the way NFL games are always
	played.

	Having said so, that pick was so obviously illegal and deliberately
	done by Novocek, only a Cowboy fan could think it was a designed
	play by Green Bay.  What a ridiculous idea !
9.4153OLD1S::CADZILLA2Field Service Tool PusherMon Jan 15 1996 19:3120
    
    Heat has nothing to do with being called a liar. You ask any of these
    noters if I come across with the type of BS. 
    
    Everything you've been whinning about is practiced by every team in the 
    league. 
    
    Having played Tight end I know damn well if a lb gets his hands on you
    he can move most any place he wants. The Packers had moved Brent Jones
    all over the field or knocked him on his can most every time he came
    through their territory. Teams see that type of play and come up with
    a method of defeating that method of play.  
    
    If you can't come with any better excuse for the Pack not winning than
    this kind of nonsense you need some help. The Packer have lost six
    straight to the Cowboys. I suppose you'll tell they cheated to win
    everyone. 
    
    A team with talent and desire will not lose if they make fewer 
    mistakes than the challenger. 
9.4154Officiating Looked Biased, But Other Factors BiggerLUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Jan 15 1996 20:0633
      With as rough and physical as the game was, it was kind of odd 
      that after about half of the game called, the Cowboys had one
      penalty for 15 yards.
    
      It might be hard to figure the Cowboys could actually amass a
      penalty, but when the punter grabs the returner by the helmet
      and thats how he brings him down, I guess you just have to call 
      it, albeit begrudgingly.
    
      My main complaint is the block on Jurkovic and the pick by
      Novacek.  The Pack did do a similar pick (location-wise) in SF, 
      but it was MUCH more subtle.  Brooks barely made contact with 
      the defender.  This 'pick' looked like an open field block about 
      15 yards downfield!  It was blatant.
    
      I don't comprehend how an official can miss that unless he decides
      to.
    
      Losing Jurkovic played right into the Packers unfortunate abysmal
      time of possession problem and (of course) denied them a starting nose
      tackle to rotate with other DL's.  It was a huge loss as the line
      was obviously exhausted.   It seemed as though much of Emmit's 
      success was right around that spot Jurkovic could have helped with
      (the interior of the line).
    
      Still, the Packer's mainly lost because they needed an MVP per-
      formance from Favre and they got something less than that.  His
      shaky start destroyed the all-important time of possession stat and
      his second INT was just a bonehead decision.  
    
      The Cowboys had nothing to do with either of those.
    
    							Tony
9.4155GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Mon Jan 15 1996 20:2720
    re: 4153
    
    No one has said that the officials cost the Packers the game, but you
    continue to deny something that was never accused.
    
    The claim that the defender pushed Novace, creating the pick, is
    laughable, asinine and false. If that isn't a lie, you are extremely
    ignorant of what can happen in that situation.
    
    The fact is that the Cowboys cheated during the game and got caught. I
    havnt't seen you admit that the Cowboys cheated, but I have seen
    everyone else say that the Cowboys would have won anyway. A little
    truth from you would go a long way.
    
    Nobody is whining, they are mearly pointing out facts. You defend your
    Cowboys, after they were caught redhanded by Fox's replay cameras, by
    saying "everybody does it". Pretty weak.....   Overall, a pretty shabby
    way to win an NFC championship. Looked a little like a WWF
    championship.
    
9.4156Dirty rotten cheating sponsored by NFL under The White HatEDWIN::WAUGAMANPittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl!Mon Jan 15 1996 20:3615
>      It might be hard to figure the Cowboys could actually amass a
>      penalty, but when the punter grabs the returner by the helmet
>      and thats how he brings him down, I guess you just have to call 
>      it, albeit begrudgingly.
    
    You have to throw it, but it was such a blatant personal foul that 
    they could have tossed the punter out of the game for it.  The
    intentional facemask rule is not in the books to an allow an even 
    trade of 15-yards for the right to break someone's neck.  In this 
    case the cheating wasn't "planned" but was typical of Cowboy 
    football nonetheless.
    
    glenn
    
9.4157OLD1S::CADZILLA2Field Service Tool PusherMon Jan 15 1996 20:4717
    
    
    	Was a defender standing next to Novacek when he ran into the man
    coming across the middle with Sanders. So Novachek is suppose to have
    run over in front of one man and wait to pick off the other when he
    came by. Now that takes some doing. All that was shown is Novachek
    running into the defender. It did not show how it got put into that
    position.   
    
    Like I said I played that position, a pass catching tight
    end is much smaller than an inside Lb and can therefore be put into
    most any position the lb wants when within the five yard zone.  In a
    passing situation the tight end is one of the lb's responsibiliy.
    
    
    >Forget it  I'm lying and the Cowboys are the biggest and best cheaters
    in the league.     
9.4158CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downTue Jan 16 1996 11:069
Just a MINOR nit from your Moderator folks.

Debate all you want, I've got no problem with that, but please, let's try
to keep our tempers, and maintain SOME level of decorum.

Okay?

Thank you,
'Saw
9.4159Why Can't I Get In American_Football? HELP!LUDWIG::BARBIERITue Jan 16 1996 11:195
      I can't seem to get in the American_Football conference.  Wrong
      device or something like that.  Does anyone know why I can't get
      in?  What a time to not be able to get in!!
    
    						Tony
9.4160GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Tue Jan 16 1996 11:4214
    re: .4157
    
    At least the last lines of your reply were truthful!!    ;*)
    
    Switzer has brought the same outlaw outlook to the Dirty Dallaas
    Cowboys that he used during the bad old days at Oklahoma.
    
    I heard some halfwit on the radio yesterday spouting off about how you
    didn't have to like Dallas but you had to respect them. I think this is
    laughable. I respect programs that get it done the correct way, within
    the rules and no dirty play. I don't respect the win at any cost type
    of play that Dallas exhibits. The thing that galls the Cowboy fans is
    the focus their dirty and illegal plays has gotten. It was exposed for
    the entire country to see last Sunday.
9.4161undauntedHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 11:5322
Chiming in, a little late, but what the hey...

Earlier I predicted a couple of blowouts. Wail, not only was the
Indy-Pittsburgh game not a blowout but it was one of the better games
I've seen lately in terms of having the contest being contested up to the
end.

There were a couple of bad calls at or near the end zone but they sorta
neutralized each other. I guess you could say that the refs let 'em play.

The Green Bay-Dallas game weren't really a blowout, neither, too. The
Pack were in it up until the lasted quarter when it looked like they ran
outta gas. Too bad there were a couple of cheap shots by the Boys cause
they din't need it. 

So, without further ado, I declare, by no authority vested in me, that
we're gonna get another one of them yawners. I'm looking for about 40-14
where Pittsburgh scores early and late and it's all the Boys in between.

Of course, I could be totally wrong, ....

TTom
9.4162Roland was that Dallas game a conspiracyAKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 16 1996 12:073
    I was just wondering if there was a conspiracy among nfl officials to
    give the nfc title to Dallas.  I leave it to our noted expert on
    conspiracies, TEFKAR.
9.4163SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jan 16 1996 12:1414
  I don't think NFL officials are talented enough to give a game to a team. 

  This is nothing new, remember the AFC Championship game last year where the
final score had little if anything to do with what happened on the field? 

  Unlike baseball where the instant replay has shown how good officials can be
in football it shows how bad they can be. That's why during the sensible period
they actually used the replay to reverse the most horrendous calls. 

  Too bad they don't use that system now so the players can determine the
outcome of a game through what they do rather than what the officials think
they did. 

  George 
9.4164TV likes itHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 12:2212
Certainly, you caint just stop at the NFL.

I don't know who's carrying the supposedly Super Bowl but ya gotta
believe that of the choices they had, it'd be hard to beat Dallas and
Pittsburgh.

Sometime during the Indy game, I can see some deep dark secret in action
central making the call to be sure the Steelers won.

However, it din't look like the Cowboys needed no steenkin fix.

TTom
9.4165Lamenting The Cowboy BluesLUDWIG::BARBIERITue Jan 16 1996 12:2341
      From my perspective, the Cowboys are such an easy team to
      dislike.  Michael Irvin is positively nauseas.  His prancing
      is the essence of self-exaltation/love/worship whatever.  It
      is so pathetic that Sanders is lily white in comparison.  (As
      an aside, while Brooke's dance wasn't nearly as grotesque, I
      would that he dispensed with it altogether.)
    
      The owner wants his face on the screen every moment.  The team's
      'cap' seems to be several million dollars above the 2nd highest
      team (and by the way...here I fault the 49'ers as well), they give
      a guy a 35 mil dollar contract.  I have my own opinions on the
      style of play of the o-line.  Switzer has the class of - oh I 
      don't know.  Here's the guy who said, after whipping UCLA one year,
      and commenting on how much less bulky the Bruin players were, "I
      guess they never heard of steroids over there."  After beating the
      Eagles, he said, "We kicked their ass."  Sure, people might say such
      things behind closed doors, but at least not in public!  You would
      NEVER hear Landry say such a thing.
    
      They are the most talented team in the NFL, but a lot of people
      instinctively have a sort of 'ethical' perception.
    
      The ethical quotient of the Cowboys from the top down appears to
      be depressingly low.  This is honestly why I think people tend
      not to like them.  They project a morality that is baser than
      most other teams and people sense this.
    
      So Cowboy fans say, in effect, "Too bad."  Well, yes it is too
      bad.  I'd rather lose than pay a guy 35 mil.  I don't believe
      in win at all costs and if the game evolves to the point where
      if you play, thats what you gotta do...well, then if I was an
      owner, I'd choose not to play the game.  I'd sell the team.  I'd
      walk away from the sport - gladly.
    
      This has me feeling for the better guys.  Guys like Aikmen, Smith
      (although he can seem a little arrogant too), and others.
    
      They really are your figurative "guys with the black hats."
    
    						Tony
                                        
9.4166Replay - Good Riddance, don't want to see it againAKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 16 1996 12:2416
    The use of replay simply didn't work.  It delayed games, was used
    virtually all the time instead of just crucial plays and then some
    crucial plays which should have been reversed were never reviewed. 
    Then when reviews were done they still couldn't make decisions about
    reversing calls or not saying they needed to be sure before reversing
    and then reversing calls which were right in the first place.
    
    Finally the one that did it was the Bills - Giants Superbowl when the
    Bills were scrambling against the clock, one or no timeouts left and lo
    and behold here comes instant replay and a three minute timeout for the
    Bills to plot there next 5 plays.  If Norwood makes the kick then it
    wasn't the officials nor the players but instant replay which decided
    the game.
    
    Hockey has it right but they never figured out how to do it in the NFl
    to satisfy real fans.
9.4167No, it was not.IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Jan 16 1996 12:2621
Why?

1) From the portion of the game that I saw, Dallas would have won the game
   without any zebra help.

2) Many people feel the Cowboys have been getting the calls for years (for as
   long as I can remember watching football, which is since about 1970).
   Conspiracies typically can't hold together that long without unraveling -
   people typically open their mouths, get bribed to talk, or commit sloppy
   mistakes.  26 years is a long, long time.

I think I'm a quite believable source for this, given how much I hate them.
I don't think the Cowboys are wearing stars - I think they're pentagrams
covered with paint...

On a semi-unrelated point - someone was complaining about Jett's tackle on 
the long Packer punt return.  Give it up.  The guy was trying to prevent a
touchdown - I'm sure tackling isn't high on the list of things he works on
at practice.  I'd feel a little differently about it if it was done by someone
more experienced in such matters.
9.4168bestest, periodHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 12:4414
Back when the Steelers were beating the Cowboys - 70s - Dallas had every 
right in the book to complain about the officiating. They had plays to
complain about in about ever game including a couple of questionable
calls deep in the secondary, all of which seemed to go the Burghers way.

Right now, Dallas is the bestest team, period. Shore there a bunch of
arrogant bung holes but man for man they out talent any team out there,
including the Niners. Certainly, no one else has all the offensive
talent, not even close.

Now, where it gets pitiful is to compare the skill positions of the
Steelers to the Cowboys. No wonder we already got a double digit line.

TTom
9.4169MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Jan 16 1996 13:0311
    
    
     You Steelers fans can pull the horseshoes out of your butts now.
    They worked because you were lucky to win that game. Lucky that
    Kordell Stewart's bogus td wasn't called back like it should
    have been. Lucky that that Pittsburg db blew the play and was
    in the wrong place at the right time to make a critical 3rd down
    stoppage. Lucky that the Colts went brain dead on that 39 yard
    pass play to set up the game winning td. After of the whining about
    the tough luck you've had the last few years you made up for it
    all in one game. You were lucky.
9.4170IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Jan 16 1996 13:061
Tommy, what are you trying to say?
9.4171and moreHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 13:1316
Wail, Tommy this aint all that good a_example.

>    Kordell Stewart's bogus td wasn't called back like it should

Ol' Kordell got major league jobbed when the Colt DB crushed him afore
the ball got to him on the goal line. Not only was the DB early but he
was making no attempt at the ball but was clearly merely trying to unload
on Slash.

As for luck, you left out a minor piece of the puzzle: they was lucky to
play the Colts at the Burgh and not the Chiefs at Arrowhaid.

Nexted time, please try to be a little more thorough when bad mouthing a
team, please?

TTom
9.4172paranoid ramblingsWONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Jan 16 1996 13:5118
    
    Sometimes I think...  "There's so much money at stake, there has
    to be a subtle conspiracy to sway major games."
    
    That may be too harsh, since I don't think that there is an 
    an "explicit" plan.  There's no person or persons at the bottom 
    of it all, and no way to prove much of anything specific.
    
    But the way we expect calls to go the "media darlings" or the hometown
    team is all part of it.  I just can't believe that it is a mere coincidence 
    that the Steelers and the Cowboys are in the Super Bowl.  It's what NBC 
    and half the country wanted.  
    
    I honestly feel like the NFL has become entertainment more than sports.
    I half expect my Super Bowl telecast to suddenlt glitch out as
    the "Capricorn One"-like movie sattelite hits a snag.
    
    - Sean
9.4173seen itHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 14:1211
>    I honestly feel like the NFL has become entertainment more than sports.

You mean like NBA?

I think this is the natural progression of letting the networks, shoe
companies, etc., run the business side of things. It's about ruined
basketball and football seems to be nexted.

Who cares what happens to baseball...

TTom
9.4174ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Tue Jan 16 1996 14:154
9.4176GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Tue Jan 16 1996 14:234
    
    	Yes they did Karen.  Cowboys whupped 'em 27-10.
    
    Claybone
9.4177Until they publish these unwritten rulesAKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 16 1996 14:3221
    Well betting on nfl games and especially the playoffs and superbowl is
    of such volume that the nfl has to reckon with it and has.  The obvious
    ways has to do with consistent injury reports and trying to remove that
    angle from the big bettors.  I'm sure Las Vegas and the commissioners
    office have some kind of working relationship (to say the least).
    
    One other area that was a big problem had to do with offensive holding
    which could hardly be avoided and finally was virtually allowed with
    some loose conditions allowed.  So now we have Erik Williams vs Reggie
    White.  What's a ref to do :-)
    
    Now on the deliberate pick that allowed Deion's catch.  How is that
    "cheating"?  Isn't it only cheating when there are no refs?  Where do
    you draw the line?  We had this with Travis Ford (btw is he playing in
    nba? I saw a ford on a box score at guard is that him?) taking foul
    shots and getting skewered.  I say let the refs call it and the rest
    goes unless you have near unanimity that something shouldn't be done
    (eg biting).
    
    	In fact the use of replay to control violence I'm in favor of but
    to fine Novacek for the pick would begin the final ruination of sport.
9.4178MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Jan 16 1996 15:0313
  >> As for luck, you left out a minor piece of the puzzle: they was lucky to
  >> play the Colts at the Burgh and not the Chiefs at Arrowhaid.

    Wrong. The Colts shut the Chiefs down cold. We got to see the Colts
    alot up here and they're a very good football team. Yes, better than
    the Chiefs and they proved it. The Steelers were also lucky that they 
    faced a Faulk-less Colts. It doesn't matter now, though. The Steelers
    are in it and everbody else in the AFc will be watching it at home.
    I'd like to see the Steelers make a game of it but I tend to think
    that the 14 point spread will be the first 20 point spread for a SB
    come game time.
    
9.4179think againHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 15:116
Uh, not addressing the why and wherefor. Just saying that Pittsburgh was
fortunate to be playing at home.

I'll stand by that.

TTom
9.4180Superbowl futures?AKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 16 1996 15:1212
    Ttom this movement of the Steelers spread from 11 to 14 and on up
    brings up a question I've had before.  Is there a secondary market in
    Vegas for the chits you get when you make a bet since sports betting is
    at a locked in line unlike horse betting where you don't know your odds
    until after post time or at payoff time.
    
    So I bet the Cowboys at a mere 11, is there some Guido around I can
    sell my chit to when it hits 15 or 17 or 20?  If the line went the
    other way could I sell it for less somewhere?  Will Vegas buy it back.
    
    Sounds like another kind of gambling, more American like the futures
    market.
9.4181good ideaHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 15:149
Betting futures! I like the idea, billte.

I know some people in the business where they themselves play one line
while giving out another. Anything to add a little edge to the sugar.

FWIW, I don't think this will get past 14 but I could be totally wrong.
If'n it does, we'll know about it soon.

TTom
9.4182MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Jan 16 1996 15:269
 >> Uh, not addressing the why and wherefor. Just saying that Pittsburgh 
 >> was fortunate to be playing at home.

    You should have just said that. I don't see the advantage of playing a
    very good team at home versus playing a so-so team on the road. The
    home field advantage doesn't count for *that* much. It certainly
    didn't help KC themselves.
    
9.4183sureHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 15:3314
>    You should have just said that. 

I did just say that.

"As for luck, you left out a minor piece of the puzzle: they was lucky to
play the Colts at the Burgh and not the Chiefs at Arrowhaid."

Hey, if'n you don't wanna think that home field is a_advantage have it
but both home teams won. Maybe Dallas woulda been willing to play in
Green Bay cause, after all, it don't matter "*that* much" where you play.

Right. Whatever you say...

TTom
9.4184MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Jan 16 1996 15:5021
    
  >> I did just say that.

  >> "As for luck, you left out a minor piece of the puzzle: they was lucky to
  >> play the Colts at the Burgh and not the Chiefs at Arrowhaid."

  >> Hey, if'n you don't wanna think that home field is a_advantage have it
  >> but both home teams won. Maybe Dallas woulda been willing to play in
  >> Green Bay cause, after all, it don't matter "*that* much" where you play.

  >> Right. Whatever you say...

     You're still confused. What you're essentially saying is not that
     Dallas would rather play Green Bay at home than play Green Bay away 
     but that Dallas would rather play Green Bay at home than a lesser team
     away. All I'm saying is that playing at home isn't going to shorten
     the gap between playing a Indy and a KC or between playing a Green Bay
     and a Philly nearly enough. As we saw Indy played a very good game cert-
     ainly well enough to win. KC, on the other hand, played at home *against* 
     Indy and *LOST*. Home field will only get you so far.
    
9.4185MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allTue Jan 16 1996 15:528
	Nice Groaner-like "Spin Doctor" routine, Tommy.
	That horeshoe you were refering to is really the
	wishbone from the super serving of crow you
	devoured.



	billl
9.4186SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jan 16 1996 15:5916
  Regardless of how you feel about the calls, the Steelers are lucky to be
going to the superbowl. 

  On that last Hail Mary pass they had lost the game. The receiver had the ball
in his lap, out of reach of all the defenders, he had both hands around it and
all he had to do was grab toward his stomach where the ball was sitting and the
Colts would be heading to the superbowl. Instead for some reason he threw his
arms out, the ball rolled on the ground and the Steelers are going to the
superbowl. 

  If that's not luck from the Steelers point of view I don't know what is. The
colts quite literally had the Superbowl in their lap and let it just roll away.

  What a finish. That was one of the most exciting games I've ever seen. 

  George 
9.4187MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Jan 16 1996 16:0211
9.4188SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Tue Jan 16 1996 16:0417
    
    	Besides Stewart going out of bounds. Does anybody else think that
    an illegal motion/procedure penalty should have been called when
    Mills caught the ball on the 1 in the 4th quarter? The running back
    went in motion/shifted from the slot into the backfield beside
    O'Donnell. After the running back was set he lifted his left foot
    and started going forward again right before the ball was snapped.
    	Also when are coaches going to learn how to manage the clock
    correctly and play the odds? When Pittsburgh was on the 1 ft line, the
    odds are they are going to score a TD. If you let them score the TD on 1st
    down, it would have saved the Colts 12 seconds and a timeout. I know
    you can cause a fumble, stop them, or a penalty. There is only about a
    10% chance of that happening. Save the 12 seconds and the timeout and
    try and comeback with a winning TD. As it was they had one last chance.
    
    
    Ron
9.4189I AM A REAL FANHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 16:050
9.4190PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm DTN: 422-7253Tue Jan 16 1996 16:216
>> Back when the Steelers were beating the Cowboys - 70s - Dallas had every 
>> right in the book to complain about the officiating. They had plays to
>> complain about in about ever game including a couple of questionable
>> calls deep in the secondary, all of which seemed to go the Burghers way.

    Did the complain when Jackie Smith dropped the pass in the endzone?
9.4191PTOSS1::SCHRAMMEEric Schramm DTN: 422-7253Tue Jan 16 1996 16:228
>           Pittsburg is just the latest in a long line of med-
>           iocre AFC teams to got to and get trounced in the
>           SB. Yup, you just scraped by Indy but anyone who
>           really thinks that team has a chance against Dallas
>           needs to contact me offline. This one will be over 
>           before the first quarter ends.
    
    This from a guy who predicted great things from the Patriots.
9.4192no catch, no HallHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 16:2713
>    Did the complain when Jackie Smith dropped the pass in the endzone?

No, but ol' Jackie has never been the same. I saw a story where he went
down hill fast after that and he's still convinced that this is the play
that kept him outta the Hall.

The plays I was talking about are the plays involving Drew Pearson for
the Cowboys and Lynn Swann for the Steelers. 

Just so Tommy's clear, I'm not saying that they were in on the same play.
The calls were lucky, though...

TTom
9.4193WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Jan 16 1996 17:0522
    
    > 	Also when are coaches going to learn how to manage the clock
    > correctly and play the odds? When Pittsburgh was on the 1 ft line, the
    > odds are they are going to score a TD. If you let them score the TD on 1st
    > down, it would have saved the Colts 12 seconds and a timeout. I know
    > you can cause a fumble, stop them, or a penalty. There is only about a
    > 10% chance of that happening. Save the 12 seconds and the timeout and
    > try and comeback with a winning TD. 
    
    I'm glad someone else feels this way!
    
    I was arguing this with my brother during the game and have called for
    this *many* times during a Pats game.
    
    Onliest thing I can think of is that it is somehow not percieved as
    "clock management."  There seems to be some He Man Football Taboo
    about not allowing a TD, even if it's in your team's best interest.
    After the catch on the 1/2 yard line, I say, just give them the TD,
    and quickly get your offense back on the field.
    
    - Sean
    
9.4194Thought Of It TooSTRATA::BARBIERITue Jan 16 1996 18:356
      I have to admit that I thought the exact same thing.  For most
      teams, the probability of victory is much greater to allow the
      team to score and to need to score a TD with a lot more time
      on your hands.
    
    						Tony
9.4195SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jan 16 1996 18:4323
  There is one type of score I've seen teams allow.

  When teams are on their own 1 or 2 with their back to the endzone on 4th and
long I've seen the QB take the ball and run through his own endzone for a
safety so that the kicker wouldn't have to punt from inside his own endzone.

  Other than that I don't know of any time where anyone gives up points,
especially if it means giving up the lead.

  I guess the question is this:

    - What percentage of the time does a team on the 1 get into the endzone?

        Probably pretty good.

    - What percentage of the time does a team take a kickoff then go score
      in less than 1:30 (or what ever)

        Probably not as good.

  If that's so then the odds are with trying to stop the score.

  George
9.4196ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsTue Jan 16 1996 18:5240
    
>  I guess the question is this:
>
>    - What percentage of the time does a team on the 1 get into the endzone?
>
>        Probably pretty good.
>
>    - What percentage of the time does a team take a kickoff then go score
>      in less than 1:30 (or what ever)
>
>        Probably not as good.
>
>  If that's so then the odds are with trying to stop the score.
    
    Possibly the right conclusion; definitely the wrong reasons.
    
    Say that a team on the 1 scores a TD 90% of the time, and a FG
    8% of the time.
    
    Say that a team receiving a kickoff with 1:30 left scores a TD 25% of the
    time.
    
    Say that a team receiving a kickoff with 1:20 left scores a TD 20% of the
    time.
    
    Say you're down by 3, your opponent has the ball, 1st and 1, with 1:40
    left.
    
    If you try to stop them, you have a 8% chance of a tie, a 2% of a win
    with no further scoring, and a 18% chance of both teams scoring.
    
    Assuming ties break 50/50, your chance of winning is 24%.
    
    If you let them in, you have a 25% chance of both teams scoring.  Your
    chance of winning is 25%.
    
    I have no idea what the actual numbers are, but the above is a scenario
    where letting the other team score is the best possible choice.
    
    Joe
9.4197SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jan 16 1996 19:1611
  Well, 24% and 25% are pretty close, well within the margin of error for the
estimates you are using. I like the 90%, that sounds about right for scoring
from the 1 on 1st down but I'm not sure I like the 20% and 25% for teams
scoring a TD with 1:30, 1:40 on the clock. 

  Even without a time restriction when the defense knows you have to throw I'm
not sure a team scores a touchdown one out of 4 or 5 times they get the ball on
their own 20. Maybe they score something that many times but if they have to
get into the endzone it probably wouldn't be worth the gamble.

  George
9.4198Sure, Pittsburgh finally caught a break-- 'bout damned time!EDWIN::WAUGAMANPittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl!Tue Jan 16 1996 19:2526
    Indy needed a TD and not a FG.  With the 4-point spread, I think 
    they're better off trying to stuff that run three times (maybe 
    four, if the opponent gambles and goes for the TD).  It's been done.
    Many many times.  Each time you make a stop it eats time, but also
    increases the pressure on the opponent.  It's better to play it 
    out, I think.
    
    Dumber decisions were the two times that Harbaugh decided to run
    on that last drive.  He picked up good yardage but it wasn't worth
    it given the game situation.  A smart QB should run out of downs
    before he runs out of time when given 1:30 at the end of the game, 
    even with only one TO remaining.  The near-success of the miraculous
    Hail Mary notwithstanding...
    
    The Steelers were unlucky... then lucky... then unlucky... then lucky.
    So what.  It was an evenly-played game, and someone had to win.  If
    Indy had won, they'd also have been "lucky" (that's what the damned 
    thing came down to, luck), but we'd still have a Tommy in here 
    trying to tell us that no, the Colts demonstrated that they were 
    clearly the better team; the Steelers' lack of accomplishment 
    "exactly what their talent would merit".  I'm still looking for 
    a little consistency, year to year, day to day... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
9.4199MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allTue Jan 16 1996 19:444
	For a lttle refresher, Tommie, take a gander at .4113


	billl
9.4200Good ol' baseball and football... who cares about the rest...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl!Tue Jan 16 1996 21:3022
>    But the way we expect calls to go the "media darlings" or the hometown
>    team is all part of it.  I just can't believe that it is a mere coincidence 
>    that the Steelers and the Cowboys are in the Super Bowl.  It's what NBC 
>    and half the country wanted.  
    
    Except the AFC has sent some real "media dogs" to the Super Bowl
    over the past decade.  Teams that have sent TV ratings reeling,
    to plummet only further after the opening kickoff.  By these standards
    Buffalo would never have made it, for almost every reason imaginable.
    Now we finally have Pittsburgh-Dallas III with some sense of history
    there.  That's a _good_ thing, and high time, but not because someone
    fixed it.
    
    The NBA still has clear bragging rights over the NFL as far as the
    games being comic farce.  And the knock on MLB not even being 
    worthy of consideration in the equation is a compliment as far as
    baseball fans are concerned.  The more the game gets stripped down
    due to "poverty" the better.
    
    glenn
     
9.4201WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Jan 16 1996 23:1813
     
    >        -< Good ol' baseball and football... who cares about the rest... >-
    
    I only really follow Pro Football and College Basketball.  For me,
    the biggest factor is the % of a season each game is.  In both the
    above, every game means something.  In baseball, you can lose a sweep
    and basically who gives a crap, you can still do well in the standings.
    A interminally long sports season means a terminally bored Sean.
    
    The other thing is the effect of coaching.  Tell me, does anyone listen
    to NBA coaches (asking seriously, it just looks like not)?
    
    - Sean
9.4202MIMS::ROLLINS_RNCAA Baseball in less 2 weeksWed Jan 17 1996 11:3224
Sorry, I was out yesterday, so this is old:

>       <<< Note 9.4157 by OLD1S::CADZILLA2 "Field Service Tool Pusher" >>>
>    
>    	Was a defender standing next to Novacek when he ran into the man
>    coming across the middle with Sanders. So Novachek is suppose to have
>    run over in front of one man and wait to pick off the other when he
>    came by. Now that takes some doing. All that was shown is Novachek
>    running into the defender. It did not show how it got put into that
>    position.   
>    
>    Like I said I played that position, a pass catching tight
>    end is much smaller than an inside Lb and can therefore be put into
>    most any position the lb wants when within the five yard zone.  In a
>    passing situation the tight end is one of the lb's responsibiliy.

     First, the replay did show the entire play from the line of scrimmage.
     Novacek was not blocked into the defender covering Sanders.  It was
     OBVIOUSLY an illegal pick the officials did not call.  No question
     at all about it.  Having seen the replay, ONLY a biased individual
     could not see it should have been called.

     It didn't make any difference; Favre's play was the difference in this
     game.
9.4203MIMS::ROLLINS_RNCAA Baseball in less 2 weeksWed Jan 17 1996 11:3710
>                     <<< Note 9.4165 by LUDWIG::BARBIERI >>>
>                        -< Lamenting The Cowboy Blues >-

>      The owner wants his face on the screen every moment.  The team's
>      'cap' seems to be several million dollars above the 2nd highest
>      team (and by the way...here I fault the 49'ers as well), they give

	Why the 49'ers ?  Did you know that with salaries and bonuses combined,
	the amount they paid to their players was 24th out of 30 teams this
	past year ?
9.4204WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Jan 17 1996 11:5214
    
> 	Why the 49'ers ?  Did you know that with salaries and bonuses combined,
>	the amount they paid to their players was 24th out of 30 teams this
>	past year ?

    They just beat everybody to the punch.  When they were involved,
    salaries were just cheaper, and they got the longer term contracts
    for less money.
    
    Like the Pats with Drew.  Lotsa bucks now, but what will a 7 year
    contract for the #1 be in a few years.
    
    - Sean
    
9.420549'ers/Factoring In The Human ElementLUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Jan 17 1996 12:0231
      re: -1
    
      I thought Policy, while obeying the 'letter' of the law,
      conflicted with the 'spirit' of the law.  Didn't they
      pro-rate contracts up the ying-yang?  (is that a word?)
    
      Basically, what that does is the following.  The spirit 
      of the whole salary cap issue is that some teams cannot continue
      having these huge payrolls.  The letter of the law tries
      to meet the spirit of the law and it fails.  It does not
      foresee all the ways people can still shell out humongous
      bucks and yet stay within those guidelines.
    
      I elaborated, but I think they basically pro-rated those
      contracts so that a lot of money goes to players after the cap
      contract runs out.
    
      
      On letting people score...
    
      One other factor and that is the human element.  We can 
      use statistics all we want, but what does it mean to a
      team's (especially the defense) psyche when it is told
      to 'lay down' and let a team just score a TD on you?  How
      does one incorporate that into the mix?
    
      I wonder if you just have to try to stop them and maintain
      a certain mentality with your entire team and your defensive
      unit especially.
    
    						Tony
9.4206SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jan 17 1996 12:1324
  What do you bet if teams started letting other teams score then when the full
back or QB saw he was going to be allowed to walk into the endzone he'd just
stand around and let the clock run down anyway. 

  Of course at 1st there would be confusion, illegal receivers down field, etc
but eventually there would be set plays like the Kneel Down play where the
offense just stood in certain positions waiting for the defense to make a move
before running or throwing into the endzone. 

  My cats do that. When they fight there's usually this long period where they
just sit there looking at each other. It's this "who ever moves 1st gets
creamed" type of game. 

  I understand that when helicopters fight it's the same sort of thing. Some
people call helicopter fights "cat fights" rather than "dog fights" for just
that reason. They hover out of each other's range for a long period of time
edging around for position then all of a sudden one makes a quick move at the
other and it's all over one way or the other in a few seconds.

  Now that would add something to the game of football. If you think people
complain about the standing around that goes on for instant replay imagine
the noise we'd here over this type of play.

  George
9.4207CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downWed Jan 17 1996 13:4414
>  I understand that when helicopters fight it's the same sort of thing. Some
>people call helicopter fights "cat fights" rather than "dog fights" for just
>that reason. They hover out of each other's range for a long period of time
>edging around for position then all of a sudden one makes a quick move at the
>other and it's all over one way or the other in a few seconds.

It's even more advanced than that now.

With some of the "radar masts" that they have now on the attack choppers,
they can sit "below sight" with the mast popped up, then they pop up,
shoot and go....


'Saw
9.4208GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Wed Jan 17 1996 16:188
    re: betting on NFL exhibitions
    
    Anyone who bets on an NFL exhibition is a twit. Betting on an NFL game
    would be a different story, but they sadly are no longer games, they
    are now exhibitions. Games must have rules and standards of play, which
    the NFL no longer has. A person who bets on the NFL probably also bets
    on the WWF.
    
9.4209to twit or not to twitHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedWed Jan 17 1996 16:2620
>    Anyone who bets on an NFL exhibition is a twit.

Uh, just cause you don't like to do that, it don't make one who does a
twit. You might be able to make the case that anyone who bets on anything
is a twit.

There's a slew of reasons why someone might bet on anything, most of
which apply to exhibition games. As long as there's a final number
posted, it qualifies. Hail, some of the preseason games, for example, are
usually pretty easy to play. San Fran never cares if'n it wins a
preseason game. They're getting ready for the Super Bowl. They are also
considered solid favorites so usually they give up some good points.
That looks like a relatively easy bet to me.

FWIW, I don't know of a Vegas line on WWF.

Of course, all of this is theoretical cause it's all about entertainment
anyway.

TTom
9.4210rest on my couch and I'll tell you all about itAKOCOA::BREENWed Jan 17 1996 16:3611
    tom's right in terms of exhibitions, randomness is not the problem tho,
    I think Dennis is referring to the outcome being fixed.  I personnally
    am 99% sure that anyone involved in officiating or the nfl tried to
    influence the game the cowboys way their ability to control the line of
    scrimmage made them the favorites.
    
    But that was factored into the spread.  The final edge wasn't the
    Cowboy's dirty play itself, the Raiders don't exactly dominate, but the
    thought that White put into the teams mind that the Cowboys had an
    "edge".  Having now an excuse, even if subconscious, the Packers let up
    in the end and lost the game and the points.
9.42118^)CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downWed Jan 17 1996 16:559
I'd like to make one very small Moderator ruling here:


	The only individual, living or dead, who can be referred to
	in here as "a twit" is Steve Kasper, coach of the Bruins.


Thank you,
'Saw
9.4212y'all got a freakin p-name on this?HBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedWed Jan 17 1996 17:020
9.4213WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jan 17 1996 17:215
    
    
       Get off Steve Kasper!!
    
       I just did.
9.4214MIMS::ROLLINS_RNCAA Baseball in 2 DaysWed Jan 17 1996 17:3911
>             <<< Note 9.4209 by HBAHBA::HAAS "slightly related" >>>
>                          -< to twit or not to twit >-
>
>>    Anyone who bets on an NFL exhibition is a twit.
>
>Uh, just cause you don't like to do that, it don't make one who does a
>twit. You might be able to make the case that anyone who bets on anything
>is a twit.

 I'll go beyond that.  You might be able to make the case that anyone noting in
 ::SPROTS is ... uh, never mind.
9.4215GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Wed Jan 17 1996 19:588
    I'm not saying that the games are fixed, but I am saying that the way
    things have worked out the last few weeks, non calls have had
    influences on the games that have affected the point spread. Take away
    the pick play and there's a real good chance Dallas doesn't cover the 9
    1/2 points. The NFL is reaching the level of the NBA, where it is not
    longer a game, but an exhibition, where rules have no bearing on the
    play that is allowed. IMHO, it makes the stuff unwatchable.
    
9.4216MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allWed Jan 17 1996 20:046
	Well, you've got the same option as here...
	just hit <next unseen> otherwise known as
	<next channel>.


	billl
9.4217Much better game in 50s and 60s to watchAKOCOA::BREENWed Jan 17 1996 20:4225
    Well you had the following:
    
    Pick play	- Teams have done it for years except it's usually caught
    		or not so blatant.  I'd call it one of those things.  Also
    		it is the danger of straight man to man defenses.
    
    Erik Williams  Cut back block.  Problem is the use of helmet instead of
    		   body.  Clip has been legal with 3 yards since I played
    		   on the playground with my leather helmet.
    
    		   Use of hands to face.  Come on, Reggie stop your
    		   whining, Deacon Jones just threw up.
    
    I personally don't see the officials as being much of a factor in the
    nfl.  Allowing the holding took them out of a big impact area and most
    of the calls are pretty obvious.  Instant replay is really more of a
    problem than the officials since it show stuff that's always happened
    except now you notice it and a bored announcer makes it more important
    than it really is.
    
    TAKING the officials out of the game by allowing holding and throwing
    50 passes a game since the qb can sit behind the sumos so now there is
    virtually no guards and tackles athletic enough to pull out on sweeps -
     that has ruined pro football.
    
9.4218GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Thu Jan 18 1996 11:0215
    If they would just say holding is allowed and let them do what they
    want, I could understand it. To randomly call penalties, mostly on the
    underdog, is silly, and that is the current situation. 
    
    I don't understand why the NFL doesn't review the tape of the game and
    fine and/or suspend Williams for the REPEATED infractions, along with
    penalizing the official that was told of the infractions in the 1st
    quarter by did nothing about it the entire game. The NFL should have
    been alerted to the fact that Williams does this alot by watching the
    game films from the previous week, where he consistantly went to the
    face of WIlliam Fuller. If the NFL does t hat I'll believe that they're
    serious about making the NFL a sport. Until then, they might as well
    have Hulk Hogan and Jake the Snake Roberts playing in the Superbowl
    Exhibition.
    
9.42193-4 Killed SweepsLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Jan 18 1996 11:3417
      re: .4217
    
      Actually, the thing that almost drove the sweep extinct was much
      more the 3-4 defense.  This alignment created too much mobility
      at outside LB to make the sweep worth it.  There was a nationally
      televised Packer game where the Pack swept on a 4-3 a few times
      and Madden mentioned this.  Makes a lot of sense.
    
      Its kind of neat how the game evolves.  I think there is a lot to
      the idea that huge offensive lines were an response to the 3-4.
      Fine, you want to give us only three DL's and prevent much success
      with sweeps?  OK, we'll throw some humongous giants at you and
      just destroy your line.
    
      Now we're having more 4-3's and I think we'll see more sweeps.
    
    							Tony
9.4220This officiating BS has run its course...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThe Immaculate DeflectionThu Jan 18 1996 12:1618
    I wasn't happy with the officiating in the Dallas-GB game; in that 
    one particular game, in the final analysis the net result from the 
    officiating was one-sided, but in the Pittsburgh-Indy game I'm 
    convinced that the calls evened out (plus, that was a "clean", 
    hard-hitting, well-played contest in general).
    
    But, nor do have any doubt that the best two teams are in the 
    Super Bowl, and no rightfully deserving team was barred entry to
    the Super Bowl by the officiating.  We're getting carried away
    here, as Reggie White also did.
    
    I was talking Dallas-Pittsburgh weeks ago, after Dallas nailed down 
    homefield advantage, and any doubts were removed when Green Bay 
    took out San Fran.
    
    glenn
    
9.4221GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Thu Jan 18 1996 13:226
    
    	C'mon Bill.  Back in Deacon's day, the haidslap was legal.
    	I'd bet money ole Reggie woulda had a field day with Erik
    	if he were allowed to wallop him every pass play.
    
    Claybone
9.4222IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Jan 18 1996 13:322
You sure, Claybone?  I mean, Reggie's a Christian man... :-)
9.4223Didn't Think of ThatSTRATA::BARBIERIThu Jan 18 1996 14:053
      re: .4221
    
        Good point.
9.4224OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jan 18 1996 14:282
9.4225OLD1S::CADZILLA2Field Service Tool PusherThu Jan 18 1996 17:115
    
    
    	Green Bay assistant Gil Haskell condition has been upgraded and he
    has been moved from the Baylor Medical neurological intensive care unit 
    to a private room. His motor functions have returned.
9.4226IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Jan 18 1996 17:158
Yeah, Cadz, but if those dirty Cowboys hadn't tried to tackle Robert
Brooks, he'd be OK now...  :-) :-) :-)

That's the best news I've heard all week.  I mean, I know you assume a
certain risk with being on the sideline, but that was a hell of a thing
to happen to the guy.

To start a new rathole - it wouldn't have happened on a *grass* field.
9.4227OLD1S::CADZILLA2Field Service Tool PusherThu Jan 18 1996 17:415
    
    I can vouch for the Texas Stadium turf being hard. I was on the field 
    when the Russian Cosmos Soccer team played the Dallas Tornado back in
    72, working as a rent a pig for Wackenhut. As I've heard Madden say, 
    it's just carpet over concrete. 
9.4228CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downFri Jan 19 1996 10:5325
The rules have evolved, especially lately, to favor the offense.

You wanna read a good book about when REAL MEN played in the Pit, and linemen
would have nightmares about defensive linemen, read _Instant_Replay_.

Two moves that defenders used to be able to do were the forearm shiver, and the
head slap.  Both are now illegal.  

I have no problem with the redefinition of "holding", as it is written, but
it is rarely called that way.   Read the John Madden opus
_One_Knee_Equals_Two_Feet for an interesting anecdote about a rules committee
meeting with Vince Lombardi and Madden himself debating what holding really 
is and was.


The biggest killer for a defense is the new Pass Interference interpretation.
Personally, I'd like to see the PI call changed to be like college.  Ten yards,
never mind spot of the foul.  Not when things are so open to a ref having to
decide what it is.   

Look at Michael Irvin, the king of the push-off, and you'll see the opposite
side of the coin.  Interferes like hell, hardly ever gets caught.


'Saw
9.4229re: the Haskell injuryUSCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jan 19 1996 12:514
>    As I've heard Madden say, it's just carpet over concrete. 

Has George Young said the artificial turf had nothing to do with this
injury ???
9.4230MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allFri Jan 19 1996 12:556
	Did anyone else hear that Joe Green (of Mean Joe fame) was 
	fired yesterday by J.Johnson?



	billl
9.4232CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downFri Jan 19 1996 13:367
>
>Has George Young said the artificial turf had nothing to do with this
>injury ???
>


No, but you know that a____le is thinking it....
9.4233MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Jan 19 1996 14:543
    
      Sounds like Roland's trying to pave the way for a Conrad Dobler
     comeback.
9.4234IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Jan 19 1996 15:212
You always have me pegged, Tommy...
9.4235USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jan 19 1996 16:289
>No, but you know that a____le is thinking it....

Yup, damn tootin'.

I like the Giants, but I'm not a diehard fan.  I feel for you guys,
especially with Reeves coming back next year.  I *used to* respect
George Young, but he hasn't produced a good decision in so long, and
his smart-ass act on WFAN makes you want to reach through the radio
and smack him one.
9.4236CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downFri Jan 19 1996 16:3430
>
>I like the Giants, but I'm not a diehard fan.  I feel for you guys,
>especially with Reeves coming back next year.  I *used to* respect
>George Young, but he hasn't produced a good decision in so long, and
>his smart-ass act on WFAN makes you want to reach through the radio
>and smack him one.
>


Joe, you just hit the nail on the head.

There comes a time in life when your ability to remain a "player" in the
scheme of things passes you by, and it's time to take that trip to the dog
track.  Clearly George Young is in that mode.

Here's a tidbit that explains it in a nutshell:

 	But Young has lost more than 100 pounds and is healthy. He has a 
	better handle  on the cap and free agency (though, his critics say, 
	not nearly good enough).  He enjoys his job. As the Reeves affair 
	showed, Young remains the top football power in the organization. 
	And he is also one of the most influential figures in the NFL.

	Young decided it was too much to give up for retirement, so he stayed.


It's gonna be a tough couple of years.


'Saw
9.4237MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Jan 23 1996 14:5910
    
      Reason #437 to root for the Steelers
    
      'Brainless' Barry Switzer says that he contacted the Buffalo
      coaching staff about the Super Bowl because he wanted to know
      "how not to do it."
    
    
    
    
9.4238CNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Tue Jan 23 1996 15:1313
    
    finally after having missed on several other opportunities Tony Dungy
    has nailed down a head coaching job. Congrats to Tony who will be
    taking over as the head coach of the Tampa Bay/(city with the most
    outrageous offer) Bucaneers.
    
    Tampa looked like it was starting to turn the corner on respectability
    last year it'll be interesting to see if Tony can bring them there.
    If Dilfer can improve he's got a good chance. Rhett's a good back
    and the defense played well last year. Tough to win though when your
    offense can't score 20 consistently.
    
    mike
9.4239CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downWed Jan 24 1996 11:2110
Nice six year contract too.

Give the guy time to try and do something.

Dungy was one name that I kept hearing come up for a possible job with the
Giants, before George Young had a brain fart and kept the Collie Lover on
for another year.


'Saw
9.4240CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downWed Jan 24 1996 11:217
In other news, Bill Walsh signs on with San Fran as offensive coordinator.


Despite what he's saying, I'm wondering what Seiffert is really feeling?


'Saw
9.4241desperate measures....USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jan 24 1996 12:204
>In other news, Bill Walsh signs on with San Fran as offensive coordinator.

When your hands are tied up with players' salaries, change the coaching
staff....
9.4242Not the OCFABSIX::D_HORTERTThu Jan 25 1996 01:1910
    Bill Walsh was not named offensive coordinator.  He is an advisor to 
    the offensive coordinator and his title is Assistant Head Coach.  The
    49'ers have another Assistant Head Coach, who is only an advisor to the
    defensive coordinator, but I forget his name.  In an interview, Walsh
    stated that he will NOT be involved in any decision making processes.
    I'm not sure how true that will be, or if it is true, how long it will
    last.  I think Walsh needs to be involved in the decision making
    process.
    
                                                         D.J.
9.4243CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downThu Jan 25 1996 10:4110
Well, you have to forgive me.

When I hear the WFAN 20/20 sports just after the alarm goes off, sometimes I'm
still half out of it, so I just get the general gist of it.

You know those guys in the Coast commercials, who, to quote Chris Berman, are
"stumblin' and bumblin'" in the morning?  They're wide awake and ready to go
compared to me when I get out of the rack.

'Sa
9.4244MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Jan 30 1996 15:013
    
      If Dan Dierdorf doesn't do MNF, does he make it into the Hall Of
     Fame?
9.4245Can't figure out this Pro Football HOF business...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelTue Jan 30 1996 15:0719
           
>     If Dan Dierdorf doesn't do MNF, does he make it into the Hall Of
>     Fame?
    
    Billte and I were talking about this at lunch yesterday.  Probably
    not, but in fairness MNF only offsets the disadvantage of playing
    for the St Louis Cardinals all those years.  More than in any other
    sports HOF, championship rings count big with the NFL.
    
    More puzzling to me is the question of how/why two specific players
    named Mike Haynes and Mike Webster have to put up with the "wait your
    turn" selection process that NFL uses (both will eventually get in).
    The only thing that bars both from automatic first-year entry is the
    fact that neither is a huge household name.  But each is "only" one of 
    the very best to ever play his position, and to do so for many many 
    years on top of that.
    
    glenn
    
9.4246he were goodHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 30 1996 15:0815
In all fairness to Dierdorf, he was one of the better offensive lineman
to play the game. 

Way back in the days of billte, you barely knew the linemen, especially
on offense. Conrad Dobler got more ink that Dan but mostly cause he had
the image of being crazy and bad in the great tradition of Ray Nietske
and Dick Butkus. Problem was, ol' Conrad weren't that good otherwise. The
mainstay of the line for the Cards was Dierdorf.

I'm sure MNF helped his chances out.

However, just being on the broadcast side of things doesn't necessarily
get you into the hall. Just ask Lynn Swann who got jobbed again.

TTom
9.4247OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Jan 30 1996 15:131
9.4248When Giants (and Lions) ruled the land...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelTue Jan 30 1996 15:1410
> Way back in the days of billte, you barely knew the linemen, especially
> on offense.
    
    Billte insisted that he knew and thought highly of Lou Creekmur, but
    still couldn't remember anything particularly distinguishing about
    him... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
9.4249IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Jan 30 1996 15:274
>      If Dan Dierdorf doesn't do MNF, does he make it into the Hall Of
>     Fame?

If anything, I think his MNF stint would work against him... :-)
9.4250outta the main streamHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 30 1996 15:324
I would think so too, but remember, if'n it were up to us, Dierdorf
wouldn't be on the MNF team. Neither would them other 2 bimbos.

TTom
9.4251EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelTue Jan 30 1996 15:3912
    I've always argued in favor of Swann over Stallworth.  Because of
    his injuries (the concussions) Swann didn't get the longterm career
    benefit of playing many years in the NFL's Golden Offensive Era,
    but there weren't many better for the big plays, in the big games.
    Still, Swann doesn't stack up relative to the greats at his position 
    like Haynes and Webster do.  I can't figger it with those two.
    Wasn't Haynes even named to the 75-Year team?  How then can he not
    be in the HOF?
    
    glenn
    
9.4252MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Jan 30 1996 15:413
    
      Yup, Haynes was a corner on the NFL 75 year team. I think Woodson
     may have been the other. 
9.4253Haynes, Webster: good as everHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 30 1996 15:4414
Haynes and Webster are as good at their positions as anyone presently
enshrined in Canton.

Swann had a bad rep, not unlike Cris Carter of the Vikings. He was looked
upon as soft and unwilling to go over the middle and take a hit. The fack
of the matter is that he was a_unbelievable talent. Personally, however,
I liked Stallworth better. The best tribute to Stallworth was that he was
conistently named by his teammates as their MVP. 'Nuff said.

As for golden eras, this are them. About ever record of note for
receivers was broken thised year. Most yards, most catches, most over 100
catches, most over 1000 yards. They beat all them ol' AFL standards.

TTom
9.4254USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jan 30 1996 16:335
re: Lynn Swann

Pure talent should count for more than it appears to.  And numbers count
way too much.  Terrance Mathis is a perfect example of a WR being in the
right offense.  And injuries should be considered.
9.4255CNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Tue Jan 30 1996 18:215
    with Swann it's the Cowboys factor. He personally torched them bad in
    two Superbowl so all the Dallas lovers refuse to vote for him. Kinda
    like Albert Belle's antiblock that cost him the MVP this year.....
    
    mike
9.4256These are great...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelTue Jan 30 1996 18:3110
>    with Swann it's the Cowboys factor. He personally torched them bad in
>    two Superbowl so all the Dallas lovers refuse to vote for him. Kinda
>    like Albert Belle's antiblock that cost him the MVP this year.....
    
    Keep 'em coming, MikeC!  ;-)
    
    
    glenn
    
9.4257Next batter...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelThu Feb 01 1996 18:448
    Breaking news... ESPN is reporting that the Seattle Seahawks are
    headed to Los Angeles.  Seahawks are claiming that they've been
    violated (many times in recent years, matter of fact-- well,
    actually it's that their Kingdome lease has been violated...)
    
    glenn
    
9.4258OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Feb 01 1996 19:034
9.4259USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Feb 02 1996 15:437
>    Dallas papers are already reporting that Emmitt is going home to south
>    Florida to play for Jimmy if Jones doesn't pay him more than Peon.

Tough to pay that kind of money to an RB with all the miles this guy has
logged.  Will he be another Payton or Allen and defy aging ?  Or will
father time soon arrive, as it does with nearly all backs, after they've
gone beyond 5 years ?
9.4260dinged but still HoFHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Feb 02 1996 15:4512
At this point in his career, you'd have to say Emmitt is more dinged than
either Payton or Allen. Both had/have a_uncanny way of avoiding the big
hits. Emmitt has taken his share and it shows with his problems with his
wheels such as hamstrings, etc.

However, barring something more serious, Emmitt has at least a couple
more Hall of Fame years in him, not to mention a market appeal.

Besides, if Jimmy Johnson caint sign him, he'll just lower the price of
the tickets.

TTom
9.4261"What You Sow, So Shall Ye Reap"LUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Feb 02 1996 16:3513
      This shows what an absolute fool Jones was to sign Deion 
      to that kind of money.
    
      Look at it from Smith's perspective.  He knows about the
      RB's aging process better than we could.  He knows he can't
      last forever because of that.  He also sees Deion avoid hitting
      (as in Bam Morris' run up the left sideline) and sees this
      guy with this ridiculous contract who will probably be able
      to play well beyond his own years.
    
      This is beautiful!!!
    
    						Tony
9.4262firsted Stiller free agent lost...MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longstill a 'Stiller' fanTue Feb 06 1996 13:579
	Ron "I hate the air"-heardt was signed by the Jests
	along with the Steelers' tight end coach.

	Kotite was on Sportcenter lasted night sported a well
	polished woodie.



	billl
9.4263OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Feb 06 1996 14:041
9.4264CAM::WAYWhen can their glory fade?Wed Feb 07 1996 12:0813
The Jets had to do something.  

All that talk on WFAN is that the Jets are basically an expansion team. 
Basically, that means that their talent is so poor, their coaching is so poor
that they might as well consider themselves an expansion team and draft
accordingly.

What I heard reported was that Galley, the WR coach of the Steelers was the one
who lobbied hard to open up the offense after Pittsburgh's three losses.  The
formations, and use of Stewart was his idea, not Earhardt's.


'Saw
9.4265MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longstill a 'Stiller' fanWed Feb 07 1996 12:4512
>What I heard reported was that Galley, the WR coach of 
>the Steelers was the one who lobbied hard to open up the 
>offense after Pittsburgh's three losses.  The formations, 
>and use of Stewart was his idea, not Earhardt's.

	I had read the same thing.  This was what caused the 
	rift between Earhardt and Cowher.  Not only was it 
	not his idea, but he was dead set against it.



	billl
9.4266I'm anal about this, but to er is human...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelWed Feb 07 1996 16:307
    
    Why do we keep spelling Earhardt a la Amelia in here?  As has 
    been pointed out, just as there was no "O" in "J_e Walt_n", 
    there's no "Air" in Erhardt...
    
    glenn
    
9.4267close analysisHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Wed Feb 07 1996 16:335
You calling Dale Earnhardt Amelia? 

Just you wait until the incendiator hears about this...

TTom
9.4268CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Tue Feb 20 1996 16:347
Larry Brown of the Cowboys, Super Bowl MVP, is gonna play for the Raiders
nexted season.

Seems the Sowboys didn't have enough money....


'Saw
9.4269BSS::JACKSONPowder ShuffleTue Feb 20 1996 16:513
      He signed or just visited?  My donkos need a CB.
    
     Tim
9.4270CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Tue Feb 20 1996 16:544
Report on WFAN was that the Raiders have a press conference scheduled to
announce his signing....

'Saw
9.4271USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Feb 20 1996 16:564
>      He signed or just visited?  My donkos need a CB.

Pray for Aeneas Williams.  He's in a different league than Larry "I was
in the right place" Brown.
9.4272will doHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Tue Feb 20 1996 17:020
9.4273BSS::JACKSONPowder ShuffleTue Feb 20 1996 20:034
      I would like the Broncos to fly Aeneas(sp?) in, but he might cost too
    much if he ended up even being interested in Denver.
    
      Tim
9.4274OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Feb 20 1996 20:272
9.4275BSS::JACKSONPowder ShuffleWed Feb 21 1996 12:179
       Mike,
    
     How many "high $$$" players do the cards have?
    
     Swann, Simmons, Hearst....
    
     They still need a qb
    
      Tim
9.4276OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Feb 21 1996 13:568
9.4277OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Feb 22 1996 16:054
9.4278IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Feb 22 1996 16:251
Multi-time Pro Bowl offensive tackle for the Lions.
9.4279CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Thu Feb 29 1996 11:245
Press conference later today will announce that Neil O'Donnell has signed
a five year deal with the Jets.....


'Saw
9.4280Neil a JetHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Thu Feb 29 1996 13:025
I heard this on the way to work.

Something about 5 mil signing bonus.

TTom
9.4281OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Feb 29 1996 14:221
9.4282MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu Feb 29 1996 16:166
	Just got off the horn with the 'burgh.  Looks like it's
	a done deal.



	billl
9.4283CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Thu Feb 29 1996 16:285
>	Just got off the horn with the 'burgh.  Looks like it's
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Did it hurt?
9.4284MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu Feb 29 1996 16:597
>Did it hurt?

	Only when I smile.



	billl
9.4285OD sucksAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherThu Feb 29 1996 17:137
    
    
      This gotta make the Jets the most poorly run team in all of pro
    sports.  I thought Indy took the cake makin Hairbrain a franchise
    player.
    
    Jerry
9.4286MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu Feb 29 1996 17:529
just to make it official...


HEMPSTEAD, N.Y. (Feb 29, 1996 - 12:27 EST) -- Neil O'Donnell, who 
quarterbacked the Pittsburgh Steelers to the Super Bowl, has agreed 
to a five-year deal with the New York Jets worth nearly $25 million.


billl
9.4287I don't believe nothing from Hempstead ;+}HBAHBA::HAASleap jeerThu Feb 29 1996 17:580
9.4288BSS::JACKSONPowder ShuffleThu Feb 29 1996 19:231
      Surely this is a joke!
9.4289MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu Feb 29 1996 19:275
	Don't call me Shirley, and no it's no joke, Roger.



	billl
9.4290Bring on slash!!FABSIX::D_HORTERTFri Mar 01 1996 01:382
    O'Donnell is no 5 mil/yr QB.  The jests will find that out very early
    next season.  The poor fools.
9.4291IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Mar 01 1996 11:546
You're right about O'Donnell, DJ.  But...

>Bring on slash!!

...is foolishness.  He's not ready to be an NFL quarterback yet.  Hostetler
would be a *great* signing for the Steelers.
9.4292he's whining whimp...USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Mar 01 1996 12:595
>Hostetler would be a *great* signing for the Steelers.

Yeah, but I wanna see the first fight between him and Cower.  Hostetler
is one of the biggest babies in the NFL...frequently questioning coaches'
decisions.
9.4293No "foreign" QB's pleaseFABSIX::D_HORTERTFri Mar 01 1996 13:3512
    I honestly don't believe that "Slash" will or should start, although
    I wouldn't be surprised to see him take a lot more snaps this season
    than he took last season.  I'm not too thrilled with the idea of
    Hostetler.  I never thought of him as much of a QB even when he was
    playing for WVU.  None of the FA quarterback's look that impressive
    to me (certainly not worth the money they would have to pay to get 
    them).  I honestly believe that Pittsburgh should go with Jim
    Miller with "Slash" coming in a lot more often than he did last
    season.  It gives the offense the air of unpredictability which I
    think they will need without a solid starter at QB.
    
                                                             D. J.
9.4294one can only hopeMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsFri Mar 01 1996 15:015
	...as long as the Steelers dump Tomscak!



	billl
9.4295Nightmare is an understatement.....FABSIX::D_HORTERTFri Mar 01 1996 15:094
    If Tomczak is a Steeler next year, I think I'll be watching more
    of the Penguins.  That guy IS the worst QB in the league.
    
                                                           D. J.
9.4296Re-posted with total permission of the No Fun League...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelWed Mar 13 1996 20:48269
    
    What the hell; here's the 1996 schedule of opponents for all teams:
    
    
    1996 NFL OPPONENTS DETERMINED 
    
    
    The opponents for all 1996 regular season NFL games have
    been determined and a complete list of each team's matchups is
    detailed below. 
    
    The official schedule, with playing dates and times, will be
    announced next spring. 
    
    The 1996 regular season will begin on NFL Kickoff Weekend,
    September 1-2, and conclude on December 23. 
    
    Wild Card Playoff Games will be played on Saturday and
    Sunday, December 28-29; Divisional Playoff Games on the
    weekend of January 4-5, 1997; and the AFC and NFC
    Championship Games on Sunday, January 12. 
    
    Super Bowl XXXI at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans,
    Louisiana will be held on Sunday, January 26. 
    
    The annual AFC-NFC Pro Bowl Game will be in Honolulu,
    Hawaii on Sunday, February 2. 
    
    The annual preseason Pro Football Hall of Fame Game in
    Canton, Ohio, this year between the Indianapolis Colts (AFC)
    and New Orleans Saints (NFC), will be played on Saturday,
    July 27. 
    
    In 1996, all 30 NFL teams will play eight games within their
    division (home and away with four other divisional teams), four
    intraconference games (games within their conference out of
    the division), and four interconference games (games against
    teams in a division of the other conference). For interconference
    games, each team in a division will play four of the five teams
    in the division of the other conference on a rotating basis. 
    
    Interconference games next season will pit the AFC East against
    the NFC East, the AFC Central against the NFC West and the
    AFC West against the NFC Central. 
    
    1996 OPPONENTS 
    
    AFC EAST
    
    1. Buffalo 
    
    HOME: Indianapolis, Miami, New England, New York Jets,
    Cincinnati, Kansas City, Dallas, Washington
    AWAY: Indianapolis, Miami, New England, New York Jets,
    Pittsburgh, Seattle, New York Giants, Philadelphia 
    
    2. Indianapolis 
    
    HOME: Buffalo, Miami, New England, New York Jets,
    Cleveland, San Diego, Arizona, Philadelphia
    AWAY: Buffalo, Miami, New England, New York Jets,
    Cincinnati, Kansas City, Dallas, Washington 
    
    3. Miami 
    
    HOME: Buffalo, Indianapolis, New England, New York Jets,
    Pittsburgh, Seattle, Dallas, New York Giants
    AWAY: Buffalo, Indianapolis, New England, New York Jets,
    Houston, Oakland, Arizona, Philadelphia 
    
    4. New England 
    
    HOME: Buffalo, Indianapolis, Miami, New York Jets, Denver,
    Jacksonville, Arizona, Washington
    AWAY: Buffalo, Indianapolis, Miami, New York Jets,
    Cleveland, San Diego, Dallas, New York Giants 
    
    5. N.Y. Jets 
    
    HOME: Buffalo, Indianapolis, Miami, New England, Houston,
    Oakland, New York Giants, Philadelphia
    AWAY: Buffalo, Indianapolis, Miami, New England, Denver,
    Jacksonville, Arizona, Washington 
    
    AFC CENTRAL
    
    1. Pittsburgh 
    
    HOME: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Jacksonville, Buffalo,
    San Diego, St. Louis, San Francisco
    AWAY: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Jacksonville, Kansas
    City, Miami, Atlanta, Carolina 
    
    2. Cincinnati 
    
    HOME: Cleveland, Houston, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Denver,
    Indianapolis, Atlanta, New Orleans
    AWAY: Cleveland, Houston, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Buffalo,
    San Diego, St. Louis, San Francisco 
    
    3. Houston 
    
    HOME: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Kansas
    City, Miami, Carolina, San Francisco
    AWAY: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, New
    York Jets, Seattle, Atlanta, New Orleans 
    
    4. Cleveland 
    
    HOME: Cincinnati, Houston, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, New
    England, Oakland, New Orleans, St. Louis
    AWAY: Cincinnati, Houston, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Denver,
    Indianapolis, Carolina, San Francisco 
    
    5. Jacksonville 
    
    HOME: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Pittsburgh, New York
    Jets, Seattle, Atlanta, Carolina
    AWAY: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Pittsburgh, New
    England, Oakland, New Orleans, St. Louis 
    
    AFC WEST
    
    1. Kansas City 
    
    HOME: Denver, Oakland, San Diego, Seattle, Indianapolis,
    Pittsburgh, Chicago, Green Bay
    AWAY Denver, Oakland, San Diego, Seattle, Buffalo,
    Houston, Detroit, Minnesota 
    
    2. San Diego 
    
    HOME: Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, Seattle, Cincinnati,
    New England, Detroit, Tampa Bay
    AWAY: Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, Seattle, Indianapolis,
    Pittsburgh, Chicago, Green Bay 
    
    3. Seattle 
    
    HOME: Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego, Buffalo,
    Houston, Green Bay, Minnesota
    AWAY: Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego,
    Jacksonville, Miami, Detroit, Tampa Bay 
    
    4. Denver 
    
    HOME: Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego, Seattle, Cleveland,
    New York Jets, Chicago, Tampa Bay
    AWAY: Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego, Seattle, Cincinnati,
    New England, Green Bay, Minnesota 
    
    5. Oakland 
    
    HOME: Denver, Kansas City, San Diego, Seattle, Jacksonville,
    Miami, Detroit, Minnesota
    AWAY: Denver, Kansas City, San Diego, Seattle, Cleveland,
    New York Jets, Chicago, Tampa Bay 
    
    NFC EAST
    
    1. Dallas 
    
    HOME: Arizona, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Washington,
    Atlanta, Green Bay, Indianapolis, New England
    AWAY: Arizona, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Washington,
    Chicago, San Francisco, Buffalo, Miami 
    
    2. Philadelphia 
    
    HOME: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Washington,
    Carolina, Detroit, Buffalo, Miami
    AWAY: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Washington,
    Atlanta, Green Bay, Indianapolis, New York Jets 
    
    3. Washington 
    
    HOME: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia,
    Chicago, San Francisco, Indianapolis, New York Jets
    AWAY: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia, St.
    Louis, Tampa Bay, Buffalo, New England 
    
    4. New York Giants 
    
    HOME: Arizona, Dallas, Philadelphia, Washington, Minnesota,
    New Orleans, Buffalo, New England
    AWAY: Arizona, Dallas, Philadelphia, Washington, Carolina,
    Detroit, Miami, New York Jets 
    
    5. Arizona 
    
    HOME: Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Washington,
    St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Miami, New York Jets
    AWAY: Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Washington,
    Minnesota, New Orleans, Indianapolis, New England 
    
    NFC CENTRAL
    
    1. Green Bay 
    
    HOME: Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota, Tampa Bay,
    Philadelphia, San Francisco, Denver, San Diego
    AWAY: Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota, Tampa Bay, Dallas, St.
    Louis, Kansas City, Seattle 
    
    2. Detroit 
    
    HOME: Chicago, Green Bay, Minnesota, Tampa Bay, Atlanta,
    New York Giants, Kansas City, Seattle
    AWAY: Chicago, Green Bay, Minnesota, Tampa Bay,
    Philadelphia, San Francisco, Oakland, San Diego 
    
    3. Chicago 
    
    HOME: Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota, Tampa Bay, Dallas, St.
    Louis, Oakland, San Diego
    AWAY: Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota, Tampa Bay, New
    Orleans, Washington, Denver, Kansas City 
    
    4. Minnesota 
    
    HOME: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Tampa Bay, Arizona,
    Carolina, Denver, Kansas City
    AWAY: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Tampa Bay, Atlanta,
    New York Giants, Seattle, Oakland 
    
    5. Tampa Bay 
    
    HOME: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota, New Orleans,
    Washington, Oakland, Seattle
    AWAY: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota, Arizona,
    Carolina, Denver, San Diego 
    
    NFC WEST
    
    1. San Francisco 
    
    HOME: Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans, St. Louis, Dallas,
    Detroit, Cincinnati, Cleveland
    AWAY: Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans, St. Louis, Green Bay,
    Washington, Houston, Pittsburgh 
    
    2. Atlanta 
    
    HOME: Carolina, New Orleans, St. Louis, San Francisco,
    Minnesota, Philadelphia, Houston, Pittsburgh
    AWAY: Carolina, New Orleans, St. Louis, San Francisco,
    Dallas, Detroit, Cincinnati, Jacksonville 
    
    3. St. Louis 
    
    HOME: Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans, San Francisco, Green
    Bay, Washington, Cincinnati, Jacksonville
    AWAY: Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans, San Francisco,
    Arizona, Chicago, Cleveland, Pittsburgh 
    
    4. Carolina 
    
    HOME: Atlanta, New Orleans, St. Louis, San Francisco, New
    York Giants, Tampa Bay, Cleveland, Pittsburgh
    AWAY: Atlanta, New Orleans, St. Louis, San Francisco,
    Minnesota, Philadelphia, Houston, Jacksonville 
    
    5. New Orleans 
    
    HOME: Atlanta, Carolina, St. Louis, San Francisco, Arizona,
    Chicago, Houston, Jacksonville
    AWAY: Atlanta, Carolina, St. Louis, San Francisco, New York
    Giants, Tampa Bay, Cincinnati, Cleveland 
    
9.4297MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Apr 12 1996 20:2621
    
       If you ever had any doubts that money and power are no
      measure of intelligence and horse sense then consider that
      Warren Sapp had his draft stock drop because of *rumors*
      that he had tested postive for marijuana while at UMiami
      and Lawrence Philips, the woman beater and poster boy for 
      the "What's Wrong With College Athletics?" folks, is seeing 
      his stock rise despite being convicted of assaulting a female 
      student. The message from the NFL powers is obviously the same
      as the message from Philips' college coach Tom Osborne - violent 
      crime is acceptable because hey, it's a violent game but we don't 
      want none of them hippie pot smokers. In a perfect world, Warren 
      Sapp's pot smoking would have carried as much stigma as a college
      kid smoking pot ought to - none. And in a perfect world Lawrence 
      Philips would find him self getting used to the smell of gasoline ,
      the feeling of oil-stained clothes and the constant ringing of the
      bell signalling another customer at the gas station. Instead,
      Warren lost a ton of money and Philips will make a ton of money.
      Vincent Brown found out the hard way that players are nothing
      but commodities and now the coed that Philips assaulted is learn-
      ing the same thing.
9.4298what a dope...SALEM::DODAA common disasterFri Apr 12 1996 21:0610
In this week's TSN, it's been reported that sources in Dallas 
have stated that they had intended on letting Irvin walk (despite 
the evidence) thinking that he'd aid in the investigation. 
Instead, he came in to the grand jury dressed like Huggy Bear 
(the models came in dressed like choir girls and his buddy wore a
business suit), and made a mockery of the proceedings by signing 
autographs (Tommy, free), opening the door to the outer lobby to 
offer do-nuts to the reporters and calling for a pizza.

daryll
9.4299CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westFri Apr 12 1996 23:045
    
    Well said Tommy.  Can't agree more.
    
    Marc
    
9.4300WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Sat Apr 13 1996 00:143
    
    I agree with Tommy 100% on this topic, and the general state of 
    sports.  It's sad.
9.4301IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Apr 15 1996 13:014
I just want to thank Daryll for the "Huggy Bear" reference.  Talk about
your campy '70s characters - this really put a smile on my face.

And, oh, Michael Irvin?  He deserves whatever he gets...
9.4302just wonderinBSS::MENDEZTue Apr 16 1996 16:362
    wasn't that the guy on starsky and hutch???
    
9.4303SALEM::DODAA common disasterTue Apr 16 1996 16:411
yup.
9.4304CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Apr 16 1996 17:266
Daryll,

I've been laughing all day about that image you conjured up this morning of
"Huggy Bear."

That and Cornholio really made my week....
9.4305whattabout Mitchell and the Jets?HBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedWed Apr 24 1996 14:599
Could someone explain what the Jets just did?

Firsted of all, the put the franchise label on Johnny Mitchell,
malcontent extrodinaire. Then they waive him cause nobody made a serious
offer which is how it works when you "franchise" the guy.

Is this legal? Smart?

TTom
9.4306SNAX::ERICKSONWed Apr 24 1996 15:428
    
    	The Jets probably were going to release Johnny Mitchell anyways.
    So they label him the franchise player, so if somebody else actually
    did want him, they would be compensated in the '97 draft with extra
    draft picks. So it was a smart move in terms of trying to acquire
    something for nothing, only if they didn't intend to keep him anyways.
    
    Ron
9.4307nothing for somethingHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedWed Apr 24 1996 15:459
I can see that logic but as it is, they'll get nothing for him when it
might've been possible, without the franchise tag, to get something for
him.

In any case, Mitchell and the Jets are their own worsted enemies. Somehow
I see Mitchell moving over to the Raiders and the Jets staying in the
cellar no matter...

TTom
9.4308BSS::JACKSONDidn't know a shark could chokeWed Apr 24 1996 18:237
      I haven't seen but one Jets game in 2-3 years now, so I take it
    Mitchell was a bust?
    
      I know my beloved Donkies could use a good backup TE for when Sharpe
    goes down.
    
      Tim
9.4309coulda beenHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedWed Apr 24 1996 18:3011
Mitchell is a_All-Pro talent and a_All-Bum headcase.

Mostly, he seemed to worry about his stats. But then again, playing for
the Jets, ya have to concentrate on something aside winning, I would
guess.

It'll be interesting to see who picks him up. Whoever does, they should
be ready to start him and go to him often or else be able to listen to
the bellyaching. I don't think he'd settle for playing backup, anywhere.

TTom
9.4310Blades pleads 'No Contest'HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed May 01 1996 13:5114
Seattle Seahawks receiver Brian Blades pleaded no contest Tuesday to a
manslaughter charge stemming from the death of his cousin in a July 5
shooting. Charles Blades died of a gunshot to the head. The former
University of Miami player was charged with shooting his cousin with a
38-caliber semiautomatic handgun at the player's home. "I want to be able
to prevent any more suffering to Charles' family, my family, my
teammates, my friends and our children," Blades said in a statement to
Broward County Judge Susan Lebow. A sentencing hearing was set for May
28. The no contest plea comes after Blades had claimed his innocence for
months, saying the shooting was an accident. 

ripped from the net...

TTom
9.4311CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastFri May 03 1996 15:014
    Now that an Earthquake has rocked the Skydome was their any structural
    damage? Can the Seahawks owner say I told you that this place wasn't 
    safe for earthquakes? will we call them the LA Seahawks quicker then we
    thought?
9.4312IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri May 03 1996 15:392
I'd like to see the look on his face if they found out there was no
structural damage whatsoever...
9.4313SNAX::ERICKSONFri May 03 1996 16:105
    
    	If there was no structural damage, he will say it was only a
    5.4 on the richter scale and it could have been worse.
    
    Ron
9.4314ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri May 03 1996 18:022
    
    Boston does not have a football team.
9.4315PHHSS1::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Fri May 03 1996 21:184
    re: -1
    
    Groaner doesn't have a brain
    
9.4316ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri May 03 1996 22:195
    
    
    re: -1 
    
    Coming from a bonehead like you, I take that as a compliment.
9.4317PHHSS1::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Sun May 05 1996 12:114
    re: -1
    
    Direct evidence of the charges in .4315
    
9.4318I'll take cocaine for 200 AlexHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon May 06 1996 14:2417
I guess that cocaine is now the official drug of the NFL and ex-NFLers.


LT was busted over the weekend for attempting to buy 100 bucks of crack.
He was at some celebrity pro-am golfing event in Myrtle Beach and
apparently had forgotten to bring his stache. LT's main concern seemed to
be the bad publicity.

And the Main Zany of those Zany Cowboys, Michael Irvin not only bought
cocaine afore he got popped but also after, if'n you believe a Dallas TV
report that supposedly videotaped the early purchase thanks a supposed
buddy of Irvin's idenitified as 'Dennis'. Wail, ol' Dennis ratted Irvin
out and they hid a camera in his car as he drove Irvin to the purchase.

Who says the NFL is the No Fun League!~

TTom
9.4319ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon May 06 1996 14:544
    
    re: -1
    
    Direct evidence of the charges in .4316
9.4320AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. BSMon May 06 1996 14:555
    >I guess that cocaine is now the official drug of the NFL and ex-NFLers.
    
    You're telling us something new?  I have a problem with the ethnic
    makeup of the busts vs the reality.
    
9.4321arrogantPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon May 06 1996 16:185
9.4322SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townTue May 07 1996 17:085
Mike,

.4298

daryll
9.4323Michael IrvinSTRATA::BARBIERITue May 14 1996 15:204
      What is your guess...is Michael Irvin done???
    
      Can we put a fork in the Cowboys?  (Four defensive starters gone 
      plus possibly irvin.)
9.4324XTATIC::CHILDSTue May 14 1996 15:545
no he's not done but it'll be interesting to see if he draws a suspension. As 
for the courts I believe he'll buy his way into a drug rehabilitation program.

mike
9.4325PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue May 14 1996 16:402
9.4326Cowboys will win # 6 next year for sureSTRATA::GARRYDallas Cowboys Champs AgainTue May 14 1996 17:015
    Go ahead write the Cowboys off........hahaha.....they will be back in
    the big one again next year.......they reload.
    
    
    Tom
9.4327just kiddin.BSS::MENDEZTue May 14 1996 17:143
    -1
    looks like you slipped up and meant big house not big one!!!!
    
9.4328POWDML::GARBARINOTue May 14 1996 19:152
What is Irvin being charged with, and what would an average-Joe off the
street get for a penalty if convicted.
9.4329Obe YearSTRATA::BARBIERITue May 14 1996 19:292
      I just heard that in Texas its one year mandatory jail sentence.
      Lets see if justice is served.
9.4330POWDML::GARBARINOTue May 14 1996 19:339
>      I just heard that in Texas its one year mandatory jail sentence.
>      Lets see if justice is served.

Tony, if you drug enforcement in Texas, what is more important to you:

	1-  putting this guy in the slammer for one year;

	2-  using this guy to reach-out to youths through public-service
	    work aimed at drug prevention.
9.4331OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsTue May 14 1996 19:525
    
    
    He's lucky this isn't 1970, he would get 20 years minimum. 20 years for
    possession on one dobie. Now it's a mindeamnor for less than 4 oz's of
    weed, not sure about the charge for candy.
9.4332MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue May 14 1996 20:0019
 >> Tony, if you drug enforcement in Texas, what is more important to you:

 >>	1-  putting this guy in the slammer for one year;

 >>	2-  using this guy to reach-out to youths through public-service
 >>	    work aimed at drug prevention.


     It shouldn't even be an option. I don't believe in draconian drug laws
     but manadatory should mean mandatory whether he's a Dallas Cowboy or
     not. A recent Globe series showed that when it comes to manadatory drug
     sentences, smallfry get the max and big fish trade assets for reduced
     sentences. Just like the OJ trial showed, money buys a better brand 
     of justice. Irvin has showed no remorse (even feigned) whatsoever and
     kids are smart enough to see through the do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do crap. 
     Letting him off with public service would serve no purpose but to con-
     firm what most of us already suspect about the justice system.
    
9.4333EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue May 14 1996 20:0114
> Tony, if you drug enforcement in Texas, what is more important to you:
>
>	1-  putting this guy in the slammer for one year;
>
>	2-  using this guy to reach-out to youths through public-service
>	    work aimed at drug prevention.
    
    I vote for slammer.  That's the best "prevention education" there is.
    They've got this jerk on videotape clowning around with some 6-year-old
    kid while he's negotiating a coke deal, ferchrissakes...
    
    glenn
    
9.4334from da radioMFGFIN::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Tue May 14 1996 20:053
      Just heard Brett Farve is going into drug re-hab.
    
      Tim
9.4335ROCK::GRONOWSKITue May 14 1996 20:104
    
    How about 1 year in jail and 1 year on probation where he's required to
    spend every weekend telling kids the difference between being a
    superstar football player and a prisoner!
9.4336RE: .4333IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue May 14 1996 20:196
Dead solid perfect...

The best prevention occurs when there are *no* exceptions.

I like Groaner's idea, but it'll never happen.
9.4337PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue May 14 1996 21:328
9.4338Say It Isn't So!!!STRATA::BARBIERITue May 14 1996 22:075
      You got it Tommy!
    
      WHAT'S THIS ABOUT BRETT FAVRE!!!!!
    
    					Tony
9.4340DOEIT::CHILDSWed May 15 1996 12:225
 a lethal combination if ever there was one...............and that's the report
 I also read. 

 mike
9.4341CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed May 15 1996 13:0313
The report I heard said that Favre said "he thought he had developed a
dependency."

If that's the case, it would seem he's attained the first step of admitting
that he could have a problem.  Some folks never do that.

On the other hand, some of those "rules for being an alcoholic" are kind of
silly --- "Do you drink alone".

Of course I drink alone.  I live alone.  If I want a beer or a nice glass of
scotch when I'm home I'm drinking alone.  Does that make me an alcoholic?

Sheesh...8^)
9.4342Get another dog to defeat this one... ;-)EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed May 15 1996 13:289
> Of course I drink alone.  I live alone.  If I want a beer or a nice glass of
> scotch when I'm home I'm drinking alone.  Does that make me an alcoholic?
    
    Hardcore, baby.
    
    
    glenn
    
9.4343CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed May 15 1996 13:3611
>                 -< Get another dog to defeat this one... ;-) >-

I have fish.  Do they count?


>    Hardcore, baby.
    

Hi, my name's Frank, and I'm a_alcoholic...
    

9.4344They always forget to lose the typewriter.CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 15 1996 13:377
  Well, I don't know about being an alcoholic, but if you find yourself doing
lots of things alone and then you feel the urge to write a manifesto, just
be sure to dispose of the typewriter when you are done.

  Got your shack in the woods picked out?

  George
9.4345CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed May 15 1996 13:5418
>
>  Well, I don't know about being an alcoholic, but if you find yourself doing
>lots of things alone and then you feel the urge to write a manifesto, just
>be sure to dispose of the typewriter when you are done.
>
>  Got your shack in the woods picked out?
>
>  George

Gee, I already wrote my manifesto, but thanks for the information -- I forget
to get rid of the typewriter.  I'll have to do that tonight.

I don't have a shack, but there's a big old drain pipe near where I live where
I could hole up for a while.

I'd just have to come out to get beer and scotch.  8^)


9.4346I'm ansy!MFGFIN::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Wed May 15 1996 17:4011
      Well I know I'll be an alcoholic starting tonight.  4 days at Blue
    Mesa resevoir with just da men!  Wife and kids gotsta fend fur
    dem-selfs.
    
      Bought 3 cases and a bottle worth of nurishment, and some food too;-)
    
      I just don't want high winds.  Alot of suds and waves against da boat
    makes for a night in the camper of feeling like your still on the
    boat.
    
      Tim
9.4347POWDML::GARBARINOWed May 15 1996 17:4316
>     It shouldn't even be an option. I don't believe in draconian drug laws
>     but manadatory should mean mandatory whether he's a Dallas Cowboy or
>     not.

So he does the 1-year mandatory in jail.  What reason does he have to
do any public service work ?  I mean, if he's "just like everybody else",
he does his time and goes about his business when he's done.  Screw
telling the kids that he made a mistake.  He doesn't have to....

Too bad, 'cause some of the reports I read talked about how kids were
coming up to him and saying that they believed he was right and the
police were wrong.  Seems to be public admittance that he was wrong
and that kids should learn from it would be more valuable than not
doing the same.  Whether some of you guys want to accept it or not,
public figures CAN serve different *sentences* and the community
at-large will benefit.
9.4348POLICE are alllllways wrong...BSS::MENDEZWed May 15 1996 18:437
    What this world needs to understand is that there are ramifications
    for choices made.  If it means that a person does time for said choice
    then so be it.  The problem that I *perceive* exists is that there
    are very few consequences for our actions.  I don't understand why
    people think that the main reason for punishment is deterrence.
    It seems to me that main objective of punishment is punishment.  If
    deterrence happens because of punishment then GREAT...  
9.4349OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsWed May 15 1996 18:558
    
    Tim,
    
      A few guy's in the next group over went first of the month. No luck
    on lakers, but the Brown's were hitting pretty good. I expect the
    salmon may be ready to start hitting also. If you like the salmon take
    some white corn along. The locals say they go crazy over white corn.
    And there is  usually none to be found in the Gunnison stores
9.4350CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 15 1996 19:1239
RE                       <<< Note 9.4348 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>

>I don't understand why
>    people think that the main reason for punishment is deterrence.
>    It seems to me that main objective of punishment is punishment.  If
>    deterrence happens because of punishment then GREAT...  

  There are some who feel that government should do the minimum possible and
since deterrence is needed for the public safety, they should limit themselves
to that. There are others who feel government should run our lives and balance
out the wrongs of the world, which would seem to include the doling out
punishment. 

  Of course the people who talk most about limiting government seem most
interested in expanding the governments role in the area of punishment where
as the people most interested in big government talk about limiting government
to deterrence so go figure.

  From a practical point of view, we've gone from about 350,000 people
incarcerated in jails, prisons, and houses of correction around the nation
in 1980 to over a million today and with truth and sentencing laws now on
the book people are predicting that the number will more than double in the
next 10 years. This means that by 2010 we could have 1% of the population
locked up, another 1% watching over them and most likely as many involved
in the bureaucracy this creates.

  When that happens we will have 3% of the nation involved in prisons in
some fashion either as residents or workers which means the prison industry
will involve more people in the United States than there are farmers.

  And we haven't even started talking about the boom this creates for lawyers
as more judges, prosecutors, and defense lawyers fight out cases that would
have been plea-barganed were it not for the life sentence staring the
defendant in the face.

  What we need is a lot less people in prison, not more. This is the wrong
candidate for the fastest growing industry in the nation.

  George
9.4351if you do the crime, you do the timePHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed May 15 1996 19:594
9.4352CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 15 1996 20:3916
  Actually there are two ideas floating around that would work really well
together. One of the Republican candidates was pushing for a giant fence along
the boarder and a separate branch of the military to serve as boarder police
for the purpose of keeping out illegal aliens. 

  Why not kill two birds on one stone. Face the barbered wire at the top of
this fence in both directions, declare the entire nation a prison and we will
have the best of both worlds. No more aliens will get in and every single man,
woman, and child in the United States will be a prisoner. 

  Hey why not? After all we're all sinners. We could all take responsibility
for our crimes at once and think of the money we'd save if we didn't have to
build any more prisons.

  A politicians dream,
  George
9.4353MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsWed May 15 1996 22:055
	Take your fence and your soapbox to ::SOAPBOX where it belongs.



	billl
9.4354NQOS01::nqsrv443.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYWed May 15 1996 22:3816
>Of course I drink alone.  I live alone.  If I want a beer or a nice glass of
I drink alone. When I drink alone I prefer to be by myself....  

One of the many great lines from George T.  It's right up there with "If you 
don't start drinking I'm gonna leave"

RE Irvin:  The guy has not seemed one bit repentent.  Why the hell would you 
even want him near a kid, nevermind talking to them about drugs?  The guy 
would have skated had he not shown up in court in furs and copping an 
attitude.

Lock him up.

Bruce


9.4355Bon-voyageMFGFIN::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Wed May 15 1996 23:1315
      Cadz,
    
      I do take white corn, and use Dick Nites, Needlefish or Arnies with
    it.  I learned that a few years back when this guy pulled up to the
    Ponderosa dock with a medium sized cooler full of Salmon and he told us
    what he used, and he had only been out 2hrs.
    
      Sapaniro basin has always been the most productive for salmon and
    browns, elk creek area for salmon and 'bows, Iola basin for small
    lakers.
    
      Here's to catching that lunker this year!
    
    
      Tim
9.4356CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 15 1996 23:2317
RE     <<< Note 9.4353 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Beat em Bucs" >>>

>	Take your fence and your soapbox to ::SOAPBOX where it belongs.

  But this is a sports related suggestion that solves the problem of criminal
football players. 

  If the entire nation were declared a prison, and every man woman and child
were declared a prisoner then all institutions by definition would become
prison institutions. That means all NFL teams would become prison teams and all
these criminal football players would be able to play on these prison teams
with no problem. 

  Thing is you guys lack creativity. There's a simple solution to every
problem.

  George 
9.4357CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westWed May 15 1996 23:366
    
    Here is another simple solution:  Shoot anyone suspected of doing
    drugs.  Good idea huh?
    
    Marc
    
9.4358CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 15 1996 23:475
  But in some cases they've already shot up. If you shoot them again it would
be redundant. 

  George
9.4359CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastThu May 16 1996 13:255
     >Here is another simple solution:  Shoot anyone suspected of doing
     >drugs.  Good idea huh?
    
    That's about 30% of the kids in High School and probably 20% of the
    adults in this country
9.4360ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu May 16 1996 14:247
    
    Here is another simple solution:  Increase police visibility.  It has
    been shown that in areas where more traffic tickets are issued and
    police visibility is high, violent crimes are lower.
    
    If that doesn't work, I suggest monthly hangings at town hall of
    all drug dealers - dealer meaning "seller of any amount".
9.4361Arizona will soon join themPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu May 16 1996 15:332
9.4362MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu May 16 1996 15:556
    
      I knew this would rapidly degenerate into George Maiewski ragging
     on Republicans and Mike Heiser pushing the conservative line with
     both of them using half-truths and misinformation to push their
     points of view. The discussion was whether or not Irvin should go
     to the slammer.
9.4363MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu May 16 1996 16:0219
    
    >> So he does the 1-year mandatory in jail.  What reason does he have to
    >> do any public service work ? 
    
       Because it's part of his sentence?
    
    >> Screw telling the kids that he made a mistake.  He doesn't have to....

       "He doesn't have to...." He wouldn't if he didn't have to? I agree.
        He doesn't give a damn about telling kids that he made a mistake.
        He probably thinks his only mistake was getting caught. At least
        that's what his subsequent actions would seem to indicate. I give
        kids credit for being able to see through the phony remorse of
        guys like Michael Irvin who only speak out about drug abuse as 
        part of a sentence. "Hi, kids. I'm Michael Irvin and I'm here be-
        cause I have to be." Sorry, it doesn't work for me. Send his butt
        to jail and the clear message is that it doesn't matter who you
        are, if you screw up your butt is going to jail. No exceptions.
    
9.4364AKEEM::GRONOWSKIThu May 16 1996 17:002
    
    What's wrong with ragging on Republicans?
9.4365trolling...SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townFri May 17 1996 16:308
I hope he does time if/when he's convicted.

That said, too busy to even bother with Meowski's pointless 
tirade.

Have a nice day.

daryll
9.4366No more Big SombreroHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 11 1996 15:395
Wail, it turns out them new folks down in Tampa Bay are big fans of
M*A*S*H so they're gonna change the name of the stadium from The Big
Sombrero [which I liked] to Margaret Houlihan's Stadium.

No confirmation yet from Loretta Swit...
9.4367mostly legalHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jun 17 1996 16:0321
Some Football, mostly legal stuff:
	
   o	The wife of former Cowboy punter, Colin Ridgway is a suspect
	in his murder. Ridgway was shot in 1993. The guy she supposedly
	hired has confessed.

   
   o	Michael Irvin has been indicted again: misdemeanor for some
	reefer and felony for some coke.

   o	Brian Blades was convicted of manslaughter despite the fack
	that the prosecution demonstrated his side of the story, 
	accidental shooing. One of the jurors said she wanted to
	change her vote so the defense has filed a motion.
   
   o	Ol' Larry Phillips found out over the weekend that if'n he's
	convicted he'll get to do some time, at least of probation 
	violation. He could pull as much as a year.
   

TTom
9.4368MSBCS::BRYDIEwannabe figure skaterMon Jun 17 1996 16:486
    
       Too bad for Lawrence Philips that his crime occurred in
      California after he left the Cornhuskers. If he'd been in
      school and in state when it occured he could have plowed
      into a car full of nuns and they'd have been caned for 
      denting his Mercedes.
9.4369too funnyPECAD8::CHILDSTue Jun 18 1996 11:370
9.4370Giants to release Herschel Walker?HBAHBA::HAASjust kidding about that figger skating thingTue Jun 18 1996 17:346
Supposedly the Giants are gonna release Herschel Walker.

Something about too deep at RB. And prolly his 3-year 4.8 mil contract
was ripe for the dumping.

TTom
9.4371SUBPAC::SKALSKITue Jun 18 1996 17:5211
    
    
    
    		Last I heard Herschel was staying on by signing for the 
    	minimum salary.  This ultimatum from GY and Co.  Supposedly
    	Herschel took it.
    
    
    					Shark
    
    
9.4372SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townTue Jun 18 1996 19:141
Grab a ballcap and a seat Hersh.
9.4373CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Jun 19 1996 12:391
I believe I heard on the news last night that he was released.....
9.4374CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jun 19 1996 13:0713
From: http://web.usatoday.com/sports/st.htm

        :

  FOOTBALL

        :

        New York Giants -- Released running back Herschel Walker.

        :

  George
9.4375SUBPAC::SKALSKIThu Jun 20 1996 13:0814
    
    
    		Herschel is gone!  Not that It"ll matter, this team 
    	rots from the top down.  The G-men will sip maybe 4 wins,
    	Dan I'm bad for football will be caned then canned by the NY media.
    	Goerge 2 biscuits short of a metric butt ton will continue the
    	misery.  It's gonna be a looooong season at the Meadowlands.
    
    
    
    
    						Shark
    
    
9.4376what's wrong with GeorgeHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 20 1996 14:0811
>    	Goerge 2 biscuits short of a metric butt ton will continue the
>    	misery.  It's gonna be a looooong season at the Meadowlands.

Shark,

You seen ol' George lately? He's closer to emaciated than fat.

Looks like he open heart surgery, liposection and his lower intestine
removed.

What the hail happened to him?
9.4377Regardless, cain't be good for you...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 20 1996 14:1111
  
> Looks like he open heart surgery, liposection and his lower intestine
> removed.
> 
> What the hail happened to him?
    
    Prob'ly got aholt of a few cases of that SlimFat stuff that reduced
    Ground Chuck Knox to an unrecognizable shell of a main...
    
    glenn
    
9.4378CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jun 20 1996 14:2124
Actually what happened to George YOung is more or less this.  His doctor told
him that he had to lose a lot of weight.  Period.  George starting eating
mostly salads, from what I heard, and lost almost (if not a bit more) 100
pounds.

I heard him tell that to Chris Russo on WFAN.

Actually, his glasses used to be too small to fit on his haid.  Now his ears
are too big.


But regardless of George Young and his ineptitude in functioning in today's
NFL, the team is pretty poor IMO, and won't do much this year.  Dan Reeves is
hoping for that because he wants out.  NYG wouldn't let him go last year
because they'd have to pay him.

I was disappointed with the roster last year, and this year's roster is even
more disappointing.

But you know what -- they're all good citizens.  (A Dan Reeves pre-req).



'Saw
9.4379Giants vs CelticsHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 20 1996 14:264
So Saw, just for comparisons, how do you rate the NY Football Giants with
the Boston Basketball Celtics, right now.

Who's gonna get a ring sooner?
9.4380CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 20 1996 14:339
RE         <<< Note 9.4379 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>

>So Saw, just for comparisons, how do you rate the NY Football Giants with
>the Boston Basketball Celtics, right now.

  I don't think interleague play gets started until next year but somehow I
think you'll gave to wait a bit longer to see that game.

  George
9.4381CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jun 20 1996 14:3432
>
>So Saw, just for comparisons, how do you rate the NY Football Giants with
>the Boston Basketball Celtics, right now.
>
>Who's gonna get a ring sooner?


That's a tough call.

I don't follow basketball all that much, but I don't really have a lot of
faith in ML Carr.  Comparing Carr to Young, Young was once great and the game
has passed him by.  Carr is unproven.

Both teams seems to be mired in mediocrity -- not poor enough to get a really
good draft pick to help jump start the franchise, and not good enough to do
anything more than tease the fans like Mary Jane with the tight sweater used to
do to the boys in high school when she'd go out with them on Friday nights.

Focusing more closely on the Giants, I believe that they have actually
regressed this year.  The line was poor last year, and this year, despite the
hype from Giants central, is poorer.  The QB is NOT imo, an NFL caliber QB and
I have my doubts whether or not Dave "Duck" Brown ever will be.

The defensive front seven is porous.  The secondary's best player last year was
just released.

I think it will be a long season, and despite Danny Boy being able to shine
by playing an easier schedule, I think he's gone at season's end anyway.


'Saw

9.4382MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 20 1996 14:3518

    >> But regardless of George Young and his ineptitude in functioning in 
    >> today's NFL, 
    
        Nobody has it easy anymore. If you're a great team like the 'Boys
        or the 49ers you not only have to fight to keep your stars but
        everyone tries to raid you for your backups too. If you're a 
        pretty good team like the Steelers you only have one or two years
        near the top before the same fate befalls you. If you're a wannabe
        like the Pats or the Giants you have to hope for a couple of 
        great drafts which requires not only that you draft well but also
        that you stink for a couple of years. You also have to play the free
        agent market well. As of late, neither the Pats nor the Giants
        have shown the ability to play the free agent market well. 
        The good news is that the league is watered down and it doesn't
        take much to make a contender. Look at last year's Steelers for
        evidence.
9.4383my thought on my favoritesPECAD8::CHILDSThu Jun 20 1996 14:395
 Celtics because the NBA is more water-down than the NFL. This of course is
 subject to change if the NFL expands by 3 or 4 teams.........

 mike
9.4384CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jun 20 1996 14:4229
>        Nobody has it easy anymore. If you're a great team like the 'Boys
>        or the 49ers you not only have to fight to keep your stars but
>        everyone tries to raid you for your backups too. If you're a 
>        pretty good team like the Steelers you only have one or two years
>        near the top before the same fate befalls you. If you're a wannabe
>        like the Pats or the Giants you have to hope for a couple of 
>        great drafts which requires not only that you draft well but also
>        that you stink for a couple of years. You also have to play the free
>        agent market well. As of late, neither the Pats nor the Giants
>        have shown the ability to play the free agent market well. 
>        The good news is that the league is watered down and it doesn't
>        take much to make a contender. Look at last year's Steelers for
>        evidence.

I agree.

Maybe it's because I'm a Giants fan and I'm so close to the situation, but
I really do feel as if George Young, at one time one of the BEST no doubt, is
now not capable of functioning in the "new" world of the NFL.

George believes in not favoring one over another, and in spreading the wealth
across the team (more or less).  That doesn't work these days.

That the talent is watered down as you say IS a blessing however.  Still, I
don't see the Giants contending THIS season.....


'Saw

9.4385They'll be back...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 20 1996 14:4710
>        The good news is that the league is watered down and it doesn't
>        take much to make a contender. Look at last year's Steelers for
>        evidence.
    
    Next time the Giants or Pats play the Cowboys in the playoffs as tough
    as the Steelers did, give us a ring...
    
    glenn
    
9.4386exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 20 1996 15:2515
    
  >> Next time the Giants or Pats play the Cowboys in the playoffs as tough
  >> as the Steelers did, give us a ring...
    
     I'm sure playing the Giants tough in the SB is still a big 
     consolation for Bills fans after all of these years. That and 
     $.95 will get you a cup of coffee at our cafeteria. The Steelers 
     were a decent team but they benefited greatly from the general
     mediocrity of the entire league. Still the team that "knows
     how to do it" will have to do it this year without Kevin Greene
     or last year's starting QB who they wouldn't pay but would pay
     his backup a fat incentive filled contract though he's started 
     all of two (?) games in his entire career. You're right to hold 
     on to last year because you won't be nearly as close this year.
    
9.4387IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Jun 20 1996 15:304
>    Next time the Giants or Pats play the Cowboys in the playoffs as tough
>    as the Steelers did, give us a ring...

It'd be the Steelers first in a while... :-) :-)
9.4388OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsThu Jun 20 1996 15:334
    
    I see from the 96 schedule that the Pats come to Big "D" in December. I
    can imagine the BS that will be flying around in here when that game
    comes around.
9.4389Was not quite the crapshoot you imply...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 20 1996 15:4819
>     I'm sure playing the Giants tough in the SB is still a big 
>     consolation for Bills fans after all of these years. That and 
>     $.95 will get you a cup of coffee at our cafeteria.
    
    Don't change the parameters of the discussion.  You're good at 
    that.  The issue was "anyone can contend for the Super Bowl". 
    That might be true in 1996, but the 1995 Steelers are a poor 
    example to cite, because they did better than that.  Sure, use 
    the 1994 Chargers.  And something like that may again occur in 
    1996.  But linking total mediocrities like the Jets, Giants, 
    Pats, etc. to the 1995 Steelers (or the 1990 Bills for that matter) 
    is shoddy analysis.  The Steelers built their team up, steadily 
    improving over the past 4-5 years before they broke in, and as 
    a result were somewhat prepared for the experience.  The teams
    you list are looking at major turnarounds to even get that far.
    
    glenn
    
9.4390MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 20 1996 16:0615
    
    >> The Steelers built their team up, steadily improving over 
    >> the past 4-5 years before they broke in, and as a result 
    >> were somewhat prepared for the experience.  
    
       The experience of what? Barely beating the Marshall Faulk-less
       Indianapolis Colts? Of losing (they did *lose* you know) to the
       Dallas Cowboys? The Steelers benefitted from playing in a mediocre
       league and *that* was what the discussion was about. No way a
       completely loaded Dallas team that's not led by Barry Switzer 
       does anything but beat the absolute dog snot out of a Neil O'Donnell
       and the Steelers. The Steelers haven't had to suffer from success
       but this year they will and it will be someone else from the
       AFC who gets to benefit from the current state of the NFL.
    
9.4391All depends on your definitions of "doesn't take much", etc.EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 20 1996 16:0724
    
>        The good news is that the league is watered down and it doesn't
>        take much to make a contender. Look at last year's Steelers for
>        evidence.
    
    What Vegas thinks of thised year (to win it all):
    
    
    NFL Super Bowl XXXI (updated May 6)
    
    
    49ers           3-1
    Cowboys         4-1
    Packers         8-1
    Dolphins       10-1
    Steelers       10-1

    Patriots       30-1
    Giants         50-1
    Jets           75-1
    
    
    glenn
    
9.4392There's still a gap...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 20 1996 16:1423
    
    >> The Steelers built their team up, steadily improving over 
    >> the past 4-5 years before they broke in, and as a result 
    >> were somewhat prepared for the experience.  
    >
    >   The experience of what? Barely beating the Marshall Faulk-less
    >   Indianapolis Colts? Of losing (they did *lose* you know) to the
    >   Dallas Cowboys?
    
    Somewhat (I did say somewhat you know ;-) prepared for the experience
    of showing up for a Super Bowl with the intention of giving the viewing 
    public more than approximately 3.5 game minutes of suspense over the 
    final outcome.
    
    The Jets, Pats, or Giants will not be duplicating this feat anytime
    soon, was my point.  Someone else, maybe, but these three teams are
    a few, to several, years away.  Free agency has brought on mediocrity
    (or even more mediocrity) but there _is_ still a rebuilding process,
    and you vastly underrate the existence and importance of this process
    (supported by Vegas' assessment of the "contenders").
    
    glenn
     
9.4393MKOTS3::BREENThu Jun 20 1996 16:226
    And the player who brought them that close, Neil O'Donnell, is gone
    with the usual nfl rag-tag there replacing him.  However, to dream that
    Switzer is the reason that it was close and it would have been a walk
    otherwise is wrong.  The coach to criticize is the overrated Cowher who
    put the entire load on O'Donnell's shoulders and then allowed the blame
    to fall on those same heroic limbs.
9.4394MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 20 1996 16:2722
    

   >> Somewhat (I did say somewhat you know ;-) prepared for the experience
   >> of showing up for a Super Bowl with the intention of giving the viewing 
   >> public more than approximately 3.5 game minutes of suspense over the 
   >> final outcome.
    
      Thank Barry Switzer for that. The 'Boys come out and blow Gregg
      LLoyd completely off the ball three straight plays and Switzer
      goes immediately away from it.

   >> (supported by Vegas' assessment of the "contenders").
    
      Which seems to be that it's a three way horse race between three 
      NFC teams and the Dolphins and Steelers benefit from not having to
      play any of them in the playoffs otherwise they'd each be much
      longer odds. The Lions, btw, are at 12-1 but if they were in the
      AFC they'd be shorter odds. These days half the battle is getting
      there and if you play in the AFC it's a much easier battle and has 
      been for a while. I said the Steelers are a pretty good team and they
      are. But not much more than that.
    
9.4395CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jun 20 1996 16:395
I'm surprised that the oddsmakers figure the Giants have a better chance to win
the Super Bowl than the Jets.

Last time I looked, on paper, the Jets have a better team.  Course, the Jets
never seem to play "on paper."
9.4396PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jun 20 1996 16:425
9.4397CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jun 20 1996 16:5214
>
>    Hey 'Saw (or any Giants fan), I met a guy Sunday night named Tim Watson
>    that said he played safety for the Giants last year.  Is he any good?
>    
>    thanks,
>    Mike

Never heard of him.

He might have been on the practice squad or whatever they call it...

He's probably better than I am at playing safety....8^)


9.4398PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jun 20 1996 17:061
9.4399Pittsburgh will contend again this yearFABSIX::D_HORTERTFri Jun 21 1996 06:1924
    To all of the "Pittsburgh Steeler doubters"......
    
    DEFENSE wins Super Bowls and Pittsburgh has (and has had for the past
    3 or 4 years) one of the top 3 defenses in the NFL.  Add to that a
    mediocre (at best) offense, like last year, and you have a Super Bowl
    contender.  Even when Pittsburgh won their 4 Super Bowls in the 70's
    the offense didn't show up until the 3rd trip (they scored 16, 21, 35
    and then 31).  Pittsburgh dominated an offense that was supposed to
    have blown them out by the end of the first half.  Yes, they blew
    Greg Lloyd and the rest of the defense off the line on the first series
    of downs, and then got stuffed for the rest of the game.  If not for 
    two "gift-wrapped" interceptions, Dallas might have been the team that
    was "blown out".  It was Pittsburgh's offensive line that was man-
    handling the Dallas defense in the 4th quarter, not the other way
    around.  It's amazing how fans of mediocre teams try to drag good teams
    down to the level of their pathetic teams (in their own little dream
    world), in order to make themselves feel better.  
        
    I wish all fans and their teams good luck this season.  Only two teams
    can get to the Super Bowl, and I'm betting on my Steelers to get there
    again, and win it this time.
    
    
                                                              D. J.
9.4400don't get itHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 21 1996 13:318
>    DEFENSE wins Super Bowls and Pittsburgh has (and has had for the past
>    3 or 4 years) one of the top 3 defenses in the NFL. 

Untrue on the face of it. You say DEFENSE wins Super Bowls and assert
that the Burgh's defense is top rated. Yet we know they din't win the
Super Bowl in any of them years.

TTom
9.4401MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Jun 21 1996 13:5420
        
  >> I wish all fans and their teams good luck this season.  Only two teams
  >> can get to the Super Bowl, and I'm betting on my Steelers to get there
  >> again, and win it this time.
    
     There's as much a chance of the Steelers winning the Super Bowl this
     year as there is of Michael Jackson, Jr. being born this year. You
     lost your QB and you lost Kevin Greene. You had your one shot against
     'Brainless' Barry Switzer and you choked it away. And if you want to 
     cry about gift interceptions, if Coryatt doesn't drop one the Steelers
     watch the SB on tv. You've got a decent defense and a decent offensive 
     line but your skill position players are decidedly unskilled and Cowher
     couldn't win a battle of wits against Darryll and his other brother 
     Darryll. The AFC Central still figures to be the weakest division in 
     football so you'll probably get to the playoffs again but the road to 
     the AFC title goes through Miami these days and the combo of Johnson
     and Marino figures to be just a tad tougher then the Faulk-less Colts
     that you struggled against last year. The Steelers will be right around
     .500 and then get bounced out of the playoffs early.
    
9.440210-1 is about right, and ain't bad...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri Jun 21 1996 14:0924
>     There's as much a chance of the Steelers winning the Super Bowl this
>     year as there is of Michael Jackson, Jr. being born this year.
    
    Record it...
    
>    The Steelers will be right around
>    .500 and then get bounced out of the playoffs early.
    
    Record it.  We heard exactly the same prediction last year, and the
    year before.
    
    BTW, the loss of Kevin Greene rates as about a Priority 10 event in 
    the entire scheme of league free agent movement, and I suspect you know
    that Tommy.  He'll be missed little, if at all.  Not nearly as much as 
    Rod Woodson was last year.
    
    Exactly how did 'Brainless' Barry attempt to give away last year's 
    Super Bowl?  I must have missed that.  (And at what point did 
    Marshall Faulk gain your undying respect?)  There's an excuse for
    everything, and most of these are secondary or inconsequential.
    
    glenn
    
9.4403OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsFri Jun 21 1996 14:515
    
    That mediocre team you speak of has won three of the last four SB's
    and beat the your Steelers doing it. The Almost Football Conference aka
    AFC still has a ways to go before they will win another SB. The 9er's
    Packers and Cowboys are still the best teams in the league.
9.4404MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Jun 21 1996 15:0416
  >> Exactly how did 'Brainless' Barry attempt to give away last year's 
  >> Super Bowl?  

     The 'Boys come out and blow the Steelers and particularly Gregg 
     LLoyd right off the ball on three straight plays. That, of course,
     was Barry's cue to go to the finesse game.

  >> (And at what point did Marshall Faulk gain your undying respect?)  

     He hasn't. He's the Colts best offensive player. By far. Take any-
     body's best offensive player out of the game and it'll make a dif-
     ference. That's not an excuse that's a fact.    
         
    
    
9.4405EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri Jun 21 1996 15:0711
>    That mediocre team you speak of has won three of the last four SB's
>    and beat the your Steelers doing it.
    
    Who is "you"?  Ain't no one called the Cowboys mediocre, and in 
    fact I've used the fact that they are (or at least were) most
    decidedly not mediocre to support the contention that the Steelers
    are (were) a pretty solid football team...
    
    glenn
    
9.4406EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri Jun 21 1996 15:1120
>     The 'Boys come out and blow the Steelers and particularly Gregg 
>     LLoyd right off the ball on three straight plays. That, of course,
>     was Barry's cue to go to the finesse game.
    
    Bottom line is that the Steelers _stopped_ (not just slowed down)
    Emmitt Smith.  You don't hear of that too often, and it has been
    conveniently ignored here.  And, at the very least, they played
    the 'boys even up on both sides of the line of scrimmage.  Again,
    not something under Barry's gameday control.
    
>     He hasn't. He's the Colts best offensive player. By far. Take any-
>     body's best offensive player out of the game and it'll make a dif-
>     ference. That's not an excuse that's a fact.    
    
    I'll take Harbaugh, practically the AFC MVP, and immense in the 
    playoffs...
    
    glenn
    
9.4407OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsFri Jun 21 1996 15:153
    re -1
    
      My mistake I misread .4399's line about a mediocre offense.
9.4408MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Jun 21 1996 16:3116
    
  >> Bottom line is that the Steelers _stopped_ (not just slowed down)
  >> Emmitt Smith.  
    
     The same way the '9ers stopped Alvin Harper the year before.
     If Barry was being attacked by a bike gang and he had a loaded
     shot gun, he'd start swinging it.
    
  >> I'll take Harbaugh, practically the AFC MVP, and immense in the 
  >> playoffs...
    
     Harbaugh did have a nice steady season but his picture doesn't
     conjure up the word "explosive" any more than Marge Schott's picture
     conjures up the words "sex kitten". 
        
    
9.4409IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Jun 21 1996 16:515
>     The same way the '9ers stopped Alvin Harper the year before.
>     If Barry was being attacked by a bike gang and he had a loaded
>     shot gun, he'd start swinging it.

This made me laugh more than the Marge comment... :-)
9.4410When in doubt, blam it all on SwitzerEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri Jun 21 1996 17:3914
    
>>     The same way the '9ers stopped Alvin Harper the year before.
>>     If Barry was being attacked by a bike gang and he had a loaded
>>     shot gun, he'd start swinging it.
>
> This made me laugh more than the Marge comment... :-)
    
    Funny, but if someone posts Emmitt's stats from the game (particularly
    those after that first drive), we'd see the fallacy of the statement.
    But of course there's bound to be some excuse, that Barry's shotgun
    swinging broke Emmitt's rhythm, etc., etc.
    
    glenn
    
9.4411MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Jun 21 1996 18:188
    
    >> but if someone posts Emmitt's stats from the game (particularly
    >> those after that first drive), 
    
       When Barry went immediately away from what was working just as I
       said. Thanks for reinforcing my point.
    
    
9.4412"What was working" == one playEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri Jun 21 1996 18:4818
    >> but if someone posts Emmitt's stats from the game (particularly
    >> those after that first drive), 
    >
    >   When Barry went immediately away from what was working just as I
    >   said. Thanks for reinforcing my point.
    
    So Barry quickly went away from "running plays which work for Emmitt"
    to "running plays which don't work for Emmitt".  All after two complete
    seasons coaching Emmitt and the 'boys running game and seeing no one
    stop it.  Very convenient...
    
    Emmitt's numbers, btw, were 18 carries for 49 yards, including one
    carry of 23 yards in which Emmitt was The Man, and another 17 carries
    for 26 yards on which Barry was calling the wrong plays.  Barry's a
    moron.
    
    glenn

9.4413PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jun 21 1996 20:121
9.4414MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Jun 21 1996 20:194
    
   >> I'm surprised we haven't seen the "Emmitt was injured" line yet.
    
      I was saving it.
9.4415;-)PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jun 21 1996 20:221
9.4416AgreeYIELD::BARBIERISun Jun 23 1996 15:1222
      re: .4389
    
      I agree 100%
    
      Yeah, the Steelers lost, but they outplayed the Cowboys at
      both sides of the line and almost completely shut down Smith
      in the 2nd half.
    
      They also played the other NFC champion, Packers, to a real
      close finish in GB on the last regular season game.
    
      Yes, they drop big at QB (unless Stewart can surprise and I
      think he's eventually going to) and will probably lose Morris,
      but still for a team to beat the Cowboys in the trenches like
      they did, its ridiculous to rate them as typifying league
      mediocrity.
    
      I usually like Brydie's comments, but I feel his assessment of
      the Steelers to be inaccurate.
    
    						Tony
                                                    
9.4417PECAD8::CHILDSMon Jun 24 1996 10:457
 If Tony's note upset you Tom, let me know. I know where he lives I can fix
 things up so the speak.......

 ;^)

 mike
9.4418More Support for SteelersYIELD::BARBIERIMon Jun 24 1996 12:2535
      re: -1
    
      Its over Mike...Tommy never forgave me for my valiant defense of
      Wisconsin after they 'routed' UCLA in the '94 Rose Bowl!!!!
    
      And another thing...I think we overhype the reality that good teams
      have close games against teams that may be considered not as good.
      Anyone can logically show that William and Mary is better than Notre
      Dame on the basis that they beat team 'a', team 'a' beat team 'b',
      team 'b' beat team 'c' and team 'c' beat Notre Dame.
    
      What a CROCK!!!  FORGET THE COLTS!!
    
      Look at UCLA Missouri.  Tyus Edney doesn't make that court long shot
      and UCLA are severe underachievers.  We see this sort of thing all
      the time and yes I appreciate that college age athletes ought be more
      unpredictable.
    
      The Steelers had a fine team.  They had the Pack on the ropes in GB
      and their receiver Thigpen dropped a sure winning TD in the endzone 
      (although they shouldn't have had the 1st down anyway cause O'Donnel's 
      4th down sneak was a bogus placemant, but I digress).
    
      Green Bay needed that game for the division title and it was in GB
      and the Steelers were playing for pride.
    
      So the NFC championship game featured two teams that the Steelers
      took to the ropes.
    
      Knocking the '95 Steelers is a complete crock, imo.   They do not
      correlate to a league of mediocrity though I agree this well
      describes the league.
    
                           
    							Tony
9.4419Go Claymores!~ Watta WLAF team!~HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jun 24 1996 17:5311
I know this aint NFl but the Scottish Claymores, led by Yo Murphy (caint
make this kinda thing up), beat the Frankfurt Galaxy in the WLAF World
Bowl.

Of course, it turns out that this was a lock, cause on this day in 1314,
the forces of Scotland's King Robert the First defeated the English in
the Battle of Bannockburn.

I just wished I'd known afore I went with Frankfurt. ;+}

TTom
9.4420CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jun 24 1996 18:0040
>
>I know this aint NFl but the Scottish Claymores, led by Yo Murphy (caint
>make this kinda thing up), beat the Frankfurt Galaxy in the WLAF World
>Bowl.
>
>Of course, it turns out that this was a lock, cause on this day in 1314,
>the forces of Scotland's King Robert the First defeated the English in
>the Battle of Bannockburn.
>
>I just wished I'd known afore I went with Frankfurt. ;+}
>
>TTom


I always called it the "Laugh" League adn was NOT disappointed yesterday.

Frankfurt had a couple of "iffy" calls go agin them in the last couple of
minutes.  

The first was an "illegal" defense call.  For a millisecond I thought I was
watching basketball, but then realized I was watching the Laugh League when
Ernie Stautner, the coach of the Galaxy, called the refs over, asked repeatedly
what the call was, and then when the ref said "I don't know, it was called
from the press box" I almost peed myself.


Nexted to the last play of the game, the Galaxy were 4th and something. 
Pelleur was under center, missed the snap, and the RB picked it up and ran with
it for a first down.  It was called back and downed -- seems the refs called it
a fumble and invoked the Raider Rule about advancing fumbles.

The color guy seemed to disagree that it was indeed a fumble, but I don't know
what else you'd rule a blown snap....


There were some babes in the stands also....


'Saw

9.4421a laugh and a jokeHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jun 24 1996 18:039
That ruling about the fumble was a joke. How can you fumble something
that you never had possession of. To say the snap was equivalent to a
fumble is ludicrous.

>There were some babes in the stands also....

And those guys in skirts kilt me...

TTom
9.4422EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryMon Jun 24 1996 20:4210
    
>>There were some babes in the stands also....
>
> And those guys in skirts kilt me...

    Well, there you go, it's worthy SPROT indeed...
    
    glenn
    
    
9.4423CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jun 25 1996 12:211
If iss no' Scot'ish it's crap!
9.4424get the pictureMKOTS3::BREENTue Jun 25 1996 13:4311
    Nae Frank, Nae as in
    
    If there's nae wind it's nae golf
    
    "  "       nae beanballs it's nae baseball
    
    "  "       nae whining   it's nae nba basketball
    
    "  "       nae fighting  it's nae nhl hockey
    
    "  "       nae gambling  it's nae nfl football
9.4425if there's nae wind it's nae budweiserHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 25 1996 14:030
9.4426CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jun 25 1996 14:5513
Yes, I'm fully aware of that.

However, the line I was posting was a sorta famous Mike Meyers line from SNL,
and he definitely did nae use nae...

About the best line he ever used (with the best Scottish accent too, laddie)
was


	Woon moor drink and I'll be choonderin' lak a snooo-blower.


8^)
9.4427just catchin' upMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsTue Jun 25 1996 21:4723
I really need to access this file more when I'm on vaca.
The damn near 1000 unread notes is taking WAY too much 
time to wade though.

Stepping gingerly around the feces that Tommy has left a
trail of in here is quite a feat.  My how time changes
one's memory!  If'n you promise to appoligize for your
unkind words about a real class NFL coach, Bill Cowher,
I could be persuaded to provide you with a copy of a
tape of SBXXX.

Me thinks that after reviewing the tape, making sure to
FF past the commercials and the halftime show, you will
be singing a different tune in regards to the 1995-96
Steelers.

I am of the opinion that Neil O'D, along with his foolish
SBXXX interceptions, will be missed in the 1996-97 Steelers
as much as Barry "I could star in any backfield" Foster was 
missed last season.


billl
9.4428MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 26 1996 15:463
    So you scapegoat O'Donnell and leave Cowher, who blew the SuperBowl
    unscathed.  You Steeler fans amaze me, you think Lambert and Ham are
    still playing.
9.4429;^)MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsWed Jun 26 1996 16:225
Being someone who thinks Grogan > Bradshaw your further
opinions on the NFL are pretty much placed in perspective.


billl
9.4430MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 26 1996 17:467
    70s Steelers with Grogan instead of Bradshaw, now there would have been
    a scary team, none of those close games, all 50-10 routs like Grogan
    used to serve up.
    
    I may be playing golf with Kevin Mannix in a few weeks I'm going to try
    for an opinion on this.  I can't remember if Mannix was a Grogan fan or
    not.
9.4431OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsWed Jun 26 1996 18:023
   Bill,
    
     Are you going to start that Grogan > Bradshaw BS again? 
9.4432PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Jun 26 1996 18:093
9.4433MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 26 1996 18:2413
    "I didn't start it"		from Sprots Handbook, ed. G.Maiewski
    
    "I didn't say that"		Ibid
    "You're out of contect"	Ibid
    
    I just said Rauf was the most talented guard offensively I'd ever seen
    next to Jordan.  Salary dumping isn't something I have to explain to
    Mike Heiser and neither is getting a guy out of Denver for a more
    liberal climate.
    
    On Rauf I'll acknowledge that he didn't get it done last year although
    he was injured and there were many factors.
    			
9.4434teams keep guys like that no matter what the cap isPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Jun 26 1996 18:304
9.4435Gutsy, heroic... stupid...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Jun 26 1996 19:0230
    
>    So you scapegoat O'Donnell and leave Cowher, who blew the SuperBowl
>    unscathed.  You Steeler fans amaze me, you think Lambert and Ham
>    are still playing.
    
    Cowher did not "blow" the Super Bowl, unless we are to believe that
    the Steelers' inspired second-half effort (including the brilliant
    onside kick call against the sleepy Dallas special team), a 
    combination of tough defense, strong running game, and yes, a
    temporary stretch of good passing by Neil O'Donnell, was entirely
    coordinated without Cowher's knowledge.
    
    O'Donnell's piss-poor reads on the fatal plays speak for themselves
    (see 32.2155 for a refresher).  As is well established, the turnover
    differential is one of if not the most important stats in football,
    and O'Donnell assumes a major responsibility in this department.
    Cowher assumes some responsibility for calling the plays in the first
    place, but distinguishing between uniform jerseys remains the job of
    the onfield QB.
    
    I think we're onto something here... Steve Grogan was also most famous
    (and you can run this one by Kevin Mannix billte) for his dunderheaded 
    tosses into coverage at crunch time.  Hence, the career stat of more
    INTs than TDs, in an offensive era.  Hence, the "great" individual 
    efforts more often than not ending up in frustrating losses
    nonetheless.
    
    glenn
     
                                                           
9.4436Cowher gutless not O'DonnellMKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 26 1996 20:087
    I thought I heard earlier how well Pittsburgh handled the Dallas
    defensive line.  Would Cowher allow his line to maintain that
    domination by running the ball?  No, he didn't have the guts.  So
    instead he forced O'Donnell to put it in the air continuously and then
    when the inevitable interception occurred left all the blame on
    O'Donnell's shoulders and the Smerlas' and Breens and Granvilles only
    to defend him.
9.4437OLD1S::CADZILLA2Loose with rhythmic syncopationsWed Jun 26 1996 20:244
    
    I thought you guys knew that JJ had paidoff both Cowher and O'Donnell 
    the night after they had beaten the Colts. Cowher was just making sure
    that O'D could keep his end of the bargin.
9.4438Run the ball? "The Drive" never even got started...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Jun 26 1996 20:2923
    
>    I thought I heard earlier how well Pittsburgh handled the Dallas
>    defensive line.  Would Cowher allow his line to maintain that
>    domination by running the ball?
    
    More accurately, a balanced offense behind an O-line that was
    handling Dallas' D can work, and was working...
    
>    So instead he forced O'Donnell to put it in the air continuously 
    
    Practically at gunpoint, even.  No, O'Donnell was not putting it
    up continuously; Bam Morris had good rushing yardage in the second
    half.  The final INT was only the second play of the possession
    (and yes, the second pass-- but that's a lame excuse for what 
    happened from any QB worth his salt, on that type of play, but
    Groganesque nonetheless).
    
    Some of us are still trying to figure out why Larry Brown's assignment
    had him covering that unmanned grassy knoll, and why O'Donnell felt
    compelled to lob it in there anyway...
    
    glenn
      
9.4439MKOTS3::BREENWed Jun 26 1996 20:3616
    >    More accurately, a balanced offense behind an O-line that was
    >    handling Dallas' D can work, and was working...
    
    So why did he stop?  He did stop.  I know why, it takes a lot of guts
    to go with the run because that would be Cowher's decision alone.  To
    pass on first down putting the pressure on the qb leads to that gray
    area.
    
    	"Forced".  Yeh, like as in O'Donnell runs what he's told to do.
    
    In the famous eastern division clinching game in December of '86 when
    Grogan came off the bench to beat Miami at Miami Steve used a mix of
    pass and run even though behind.  There I wouldn't doubt that Grogan
    did probably have some input to the play-calling having the ability to
    do it.
    
9.4440Well...CSC32::J_HENSONDon't get even, get ahead!Wed Jun 26 1996 21:218
>>   <<< Note 9.4437 by OLD1S::CADZILLA2 "Loose with rhythmic syncopations" >>>
>>
>>    
>>    I thought you guys knew that JJ had paidoff both Cowher and O'Donnell 
>>    the night after they had beaten the Colts. Cowher was just making sure
>>    that O'D could keep his end of the bargin.

Did it count against the salary cap?
9.4441Since when is it gutless to go for the "W"?EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 27 1996 12:5119
    
>    So why did he stop?  He did stop.  I know why, it takes a lot of guts
>    to go with the run because that would be Cowher's decision alone. To
>    pass on first down putting the pressure on the qb leads to that gray
>    area.
    
    Cowher went to the pass for all of two plays, and he's somehow 
    "gutless".  The first play was a wide open pass that would have
    went for 20 yards to midfield but the receiver dropped the ball.
    Poor play calling?  So it's 2nd-and-10, late in the game, and
    Cowher does the shocking thing and passes (where if O'D has any
    biggame QB presence, the play produces a TD).  I understand that
    maybe the Bill Parcells thing to do is to slam the ball into the
    line a couple times on 2nd-and-10 and punt, so that you can get 
    the ball back for last possession with 0:45 left, but I can't
    call the alternative "gutless".
    
    glenn
        
9.4442MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu Jun 27 1996 15:256
	> the Smerlas' and Breens and Granvilles only to defend him.

	Now that's some questionable company you hang with there billte.


	billl
9.4443MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 27 1996 15:303
    
      If Jimmy Johnson was on that Dallas sideline the game would 
     have been over after the first quarter.
9.4444MKOTS3::BREENThu Jun 27 1996 19:067
    Glenn, 
    	"Gutless" is your terminology.  First down run for four keeps the
    Dallas defense honest and they can't pull the stunts that mixed up the
    receivers.
    
    	I will admit that a Steve Grogan or possibly even a Bradshaw would
    have reacted correctly and thrown the homerun.
9.4445Two months until the much-awaited O'D-bashing season beginsEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 27 1996 19:1318
    
>    "Gutless" is your terminology.  First down run for four keeps the
>    Dallas defense honest and they can't pull the stunts that mixed up the
>    receivers.
    
    For O'D, yes.  I think O'Donnell, while this great percentage passer
    in the regular season, gets glassy-eyed and weak-kneed in the big
    game.  I've seen it too many times, like with that ball he threw
    in the AFC Championship Game right into Coryatt's stomach.  The
    great, or even very good ones, don't do that.  O'Donnell lacks that
    certain intestinal fortitude that even Grogan possessed in much
    greater quantity.
    
    Like Billll, I think that the Steelers will miss O'D in the regular
    season, especially at first, but over the long haul, not much at all.
    
    glenn
    
9.4446MKOTS3::BREENThu Jun 27 1996 20:329
    I agree, O'Donnell's no Grogan.
    
    I am just not completely convinced that these passes are entirely his
    fault or team/coaching mess ups.  Watching O'Donnell during the second
    half I thought he was completely intense and into it.  From some of the
    dropped balls I couldn't say that for his receivers.  In fact O'Donnell
    made several pin point passes into heavy traffic.
    
    Perhaps now that he's a Jet someone will get his side of the story.
9.4447Miami says bye-bye to GreenHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Jul 10 1996 17:439
Miami has terminated the contract of TE Eric Green.

Several issues were at dispute but mainly the Dolphins claimed he was fat
and outta shape and Green and his agent claim he's still recovering from
injuries.

Look for this one to at least go to arbitration if not the courts.

TTom
9.4448Committment to MediocrityODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsWed Jul 10 1996 18:0420
    In their commitment to Total Mediocrity, the Falcons have signed June
    Jones up for another three year stint.

    What does this mean?

    Three more years of - 

    Chuck and Duck ('nuff said)
    Making the playoffs as a wild card is the pinnacle of the franchises
    season.
    An exciting horizontal passing game.
    Tight End?  Only on the cheerleaders!
    Looking north up I-85 and seeing a franchise that does have a clue.
    Losing close games due to the lack of a clock eating offensive scheme.
    
    Any room left on the Painters bandwagon, TTom?

    UMDan 

                                                                          
9.4449come on upHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Jul 10 1996 18:069
>    Any room left on the Painters bandwagon, TTom?

Come on up, UMDan. The morer the merrier.

What's Jeff George's status? Has he re-signed, etc.?

And I heard that Andre Rison is available...

TTom
9.4450Make room on the wagon!ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsWed Jul 10 1996 18:3713
    Still no movement on the George front.  The paper says that after
    Monday "franchise" and "transition" players can only negotiate with
    their current team if they have not signed elsewhere (redundancy meter
    alert?).  They may sign him for the amount required by the
    "designation" (don't remember if it is "franchise" or "transition") and
    see what happens.  Without him the chuck and duck doesn't hold up.

    Rison was cut loose, but his $5M signing bonus still counts against the
    Ravens cap for this year and (I think) next's.  With his talent 
    he'll be with someone before too long.

    UMDan
    
9.4451EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Jul 10 1996 18:4916
     
> Miami has terminated the contract of TE Eric Green.
> 
> Several issues were at dispute but mainly the Dolphins claimed he was fat
> and outta shape and Green and his agent claim he's still recovering from
> injuries.
    
    Another player that the Stillers just "can't do without" bites the
    dust, forthwith.  Good thing that the Stillers have proved without
    a doubt that they don't know what they're doing in the free agent
    era (have lost all but one of 20+ eligible FAs since the system was 
    originated-- all but Carnell Lake-- which may be the key to longterm 
    viability).
    
    glenn
    
9.4452MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Wed Jul 10 1996 19:2518
    
     >> Good thing that the Stillers have proved without a doubt that 
     >> they don't know what they're doing in the free agent era 
 
        I don't know about 'without a doubt' (and yes, I can spot 
        sarcasm when I see it). Eric was a headache that any smart
        coach would be happy to see go. I think Bettis will help
        the Steelers be the kind of smashmouth team that can be
        a contender even without an experienced QB. The real test 
        of how good the Steelers front office is will come when other 
        teams come raiding in earnest. When your offensive line and 
        your defense have as much talent as the Steelers do, you can't 
        pay everybody what somebody else will and depth suffers. Ask 
        the guys who beat the Steelers for it all last year, the Cowboys, 
        who went from completely loaded and head s and shoulders above 
        everybody else to having to actually scrap for the title. The
        Steelers front office hasn't even gotten to the hard part yet.
    
9.4453extra salsa not allowedMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsWed Jul 10 1996 20:336
	Nice spin there, Tommy.  Me thinks you should
	be dining on some "crow nachos".



	billl
9.4454training camps previewHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jul 11 1996 13:57736
[www.usatoday.com]   
     _________________________________________________________________
   
  1996 TRAINING CAMP PREVIEW
  
  AFC
  
   
   
   BALTIMORE
   
   Camp: Western Maryland College, Westminster, July 15.
   
   1995 finish: 5-11, 4th in Central.
   
   New faces: For Baltimore fans, they're almost all new. But coach Ted
   Marchibroda, who once coached Baltimore Colts, is familiar. He's back
   after being forced out of Indianapolis. First Ravens draft pick,
   UCLA's Jonathan Ogden, will start at LG. Second No. 1 pick, MLB Ray
   Lewis, also figures to start. WR Floyd Turner comes from Indy to fill
   sudden need.
   
   Departed: WR Andre Rison ($17 million, $5 M bonus) cut in salary cap
   move along with aging MLB Pepper Johnson. WR Keenan McCardell, S Dana
   Hall, S Louis Riddick and FB Tommy Vardell moved as free agents.
   
   Outlook: Then-Browns fell apart last year, but many parts from 11-5
   squad in '94 return. However, much hinges on play of QB Vinny
   Testaverde.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   BUFFALO
   
   Camp: Fredonia (N.Y.) State University, July 18.
   
   1995 finish: 10-6, 1st in East, lost AFC divisional playoff.
   
   New faces: Ex-Detroit LB Chris Spielman signed for run-stuffing role.
   Ex-Saint WR Quinn Early and No. 1 pick Eric Moulds add speed to
   21st-ranked passing game. No. 2 DE Gabe Northern can learn pass-rush
   tricks from Bruce Smith.
   
   Departed: Longtime cog, LB Cornelius Bennett, fled to Atlanta. WR Bill
   Brooks, who filled in superbly for injured Andre Reed in '95, signed
   with Washington.
   
   Outlook: Should make run for division crown, with nucleus players in
   Smith, QB Jim Kelly, RB Thurman Thomas and LB Bryce Paup. Much depends
   on Kelly, who fought through shoulder, knee and assorted other bruises
   last season. Getting SS Henry Jones back to Pro Bowl form after knee
   surgery is key for secondary stung by injuries.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   CINCINNATI
   
   Camp: Wilmington (Ohio) College, July 15, 19.
   
   1995 finish: 7-9, 2nd in Central.
   
   New faces: No. 1 pick, OT Willie Anderson. Secondary overhauled with
   three new starters via free agency: CBs Ashley Ambrose from
   Indianapolis and Jimmy Spencer from New Orleans and ex-San Diego SS Bo
   Orlando. Despite established TE in Tony McGee, No. 2 pick Marco
   Battaglia will get work in 2-TE sets.
   
   Departed: FS Darryl Williams took free agency flight to Seattle.
   
   Outlook: With QB Jeff Blake leading AFC with 28 TD passes in '95,
   Bengals hope to supplement passing prowess with running of last year's
   No. 1 overall pick, RB Ki-Jana Carter, whose rookie season was wiped
   out with preseason knee surgery. Defense ranked dead-last in NFL in
   '95, needs dominant pass-rusher.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   DENVER
   
   Camp: Northern Colorado University, Greeley, July 19.
   
   1995 finish: 8-8, 4th in West.
   
   New faces: Ex-49ers pass-rushing DE Alfred Williams. LB John Mobley,
   the No. 1 pick. Ex-Eagles LB Bill Romanowski can help stuff run, and
   ex-49ers CB Toi Cook adds secondary depth. Ex-Giants WR Mike Sherrard
   shoulp help.
   
   Departed: RB-KR Glyn Milburn was traded to Detroit, DE Shane Dronett
   left for Atlanta and WR Mike Pritchard got released.
   
   Outlook: Broncos need defense to keep out of shootout games. The unit
   allowed at least 27 points in five games in '95, while the offense led
   AFC. Elway, 36, still formidable. RB Terrell Davis, Denver's first
   1,000-yard rusher in five years, is key for balance.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   HOUSTON
   
   Camp: Trinity University, San Antonio, July 19.
   
   1995 finish: 7-9, 3rd in Central.
   
   New faces: Backfield added power-RB Eddie George with No. 1 pick and
   San Diego's former ace receiving-RB, Ronnie Harmon. Ex-Chiefs WR
   Willie Davis brings speed. Ex-Seattle S Rafael Robinson adds depth. FB
   Frank Wycheck.
   
   Departed: DT Glenn Montgomery dealt to Seattle in draft-day
   manuevering, and defense also lost standout LB Eddie Robinson. FB Todd
   McNair had 60 catches in '95 but didn't fit into plans.
   
   Outlook: With move to Nashville imminent for 1998, not much expected
   in support department. But lame-duck franchise could still intrigue
   locals with second-year QB Steve McNair prepping to unseat veteran
   Chris Chandler. Rebuilding continues on DL, where No. 2 DT Bryant Mix
   could start as rookie. Solid defense much better with MLB Al Smith and
   FS Marcus Roberston return from injuries.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   INDIANAPOLIS
   
   Camp: Anderson (Ind.) University, rookies reported July 5; vets, July
   15.
   
   1995 finish: 9-7, 2nd in East, lost AFC championship game.
   
   New faces: Free agent arrivals in OT Troy Auzenne and Gs Jay
   Leeuwenburg and Doug Widell. G Tony Mandarich tries to revive career
   after three-year layoff. No. 1 pick Marvin Harrison is polished WR.
   
   Departed: Marchibroda forced out. Defensive coordinator Vince Tobin
   got chance to be head coach in Arizona. OT Will Wolford left as free
   agent, and C Kirk Lowdermilk mulls retirement. CB Ashley Ambrose left
   for Cincinnati.
   
   Outlook: Colts, with new coach Lindy Infante and defensive boss Jim
   Johnson, aim to prove that last year's emergence in playoffs wasn't
   fluke. Faulk has recovered from knee problem, but Colts still want to
   expand passing game.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   JACKSONVILLE
   
   Camp site: Jacksonville (Fla.) Municipal Stadium, July 18.
   
   1995 finish: 4-12, 5th in Central.
   
   New faces: OT Leon Searcy and No. 2 pick, C Michael Cheever, were
   added to promising young line. FB Natrone Means, claimed after cut by
   San Diego. Keenan McCardell is another WR target. Jags nabbed Kevin
   Hardy, top LB in draft, ex-Houston playmaking LB Eddie Robinson and
   solid ex-Green Bay NT John Jurkovic. No. 2 DE Tony Brackens could have
   impact.
   
   Departed: QB Steve Beuerlein, S Darren Carrington and G Eugene Chung.
   
   Outlook: Jaguars fared better than most expansion teams in first year.
   But like most teams starting from scratch, personnel shuffling
   resumes. Getting 28th-ranked offense to develop some consistency
   relies on big year from Means.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   KANSAS CITY
   
   Camp: University of Wisconsin-River Falls, July 25.
   
   1995 finish: 13-3, 1st in West, lost in divisional playoff.
   
   New faces: Chiefs drafted DBs Jerome Woods and Reggie Tongue with
   first two picks. Fast WR Joe Horn enters as ex-CFL standout, and
   Philadelphia-ex Reggie Johnson added to bolster TE spot.
   
   Departed: WR Willie Davis and DE Darren Mickel fled as free agents. K
   Lin Elliott, who missed three FGs in playoff loss.
   
   Outlook: Mission is to regroup after upset loss in playoffs.
   Exceptional run defense remains intact, with S Mark Collins' decision
   not to retire an added bonus. But QB Steve Bono is man on hot seat
   after miserable '95 finish. With several nucleus players (RB Marcus
   Allen, DE Neil Smith and OT John Alt) in 30s, Chiefs' window for Super
   Bowl berth is diminishing.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   MIAMI
   
   Camp site: Nova University, Davie, Fla., July 15, 18.
   
   1995 finish: 9-7, 3rd in East, lost wild-card playoff.
   
   New faces: After two-year hiatus, Jimmy Johnson is back.
   Ex-Philadelphia WR Fred Barnett was biggest free-agent signee. Drafted
   DE Daryl Gardener in first round and RB Karim Abdul-Jabbar in third.
   Other pickups: ex-Minnesota LB Jack Del Rio, ex-Philadelphia DE Daniel
   Stubbs, ex-Packer WR-KR Charles Jordan.
   
   Departed: Coach Don Shula. Key defensive starters MLB Bryan Cox, CB
   Troy Vincent and DE Marco Coleman took free-agency route, as did WR
   Irving Fryar. Defensive coordinator Tom Olivadotti fired. TE Eric
   Green cut.
   
   Outlook: It's left to Johnson and his motivational skills to bring out
   best in Dolphins. But rebuilding defense and solidifying running game
   are other priorities.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   NEW ENGLAND
   
   Camp site: Bryant College, Smithfield, R.I., July 19.
   
   1995 finish: 6-10, 4th in East.
   
   New faces: Patriots used No. 1 pick on big-play WR Terry Glenn and
   signed ex-Charger Shawn Jefferson to upgrade receiving corps.
   Free-agent signee Willie Clay and No. 2 pick Lawyer Milloy projected
   as S starters. CB Michael McGruder could help, too. DTs Pio
   Sagapolutele and Mark Wheeler to beef up front. OT Larry Tharpe, P-QB
   Tom Tupa provide depth. Signed ex-Browns coach Bill Belichick as
   defensive coordinator.
   
   Departed: Traded disappointing OT Pat Harlow to Raiders.
   
   Outlook: Is this coach Parcells' last hurrah? Speculation persists
   after Parcells clipped a year from contract. Getting QB Drew Bledsoe
   back on track after nightmarish ''sophomore'' season (13-16 TD-INT
   ratio, just 51% completion rate, shoulder injury) is key. Also,
   28th-ranked defense switches to 4-3.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   NEW YORK JETS
   
   Camp: Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., July 13, 19.
   
   1995 finish: 3-13, 5th in East.
   
   New faces: Overhaul of offense is prodded by two key members from
   Pittsburgh's Super Bowl XXX squad - QB Neil O'Donnell and coordinator
   Ron Erhardt. Used draft's No. 1 pick on Southern California WR
   Keyshawn Johnson. Other new targets: ex-Chicago Bear Jeff Graham and
   Nevada's Alex Van Dyke, second-round pick. Ex-Giants OT Jumbo Elliott
   and journeyman OT Harry Boatswain. QB Frank Reich is No. 2 arm.
   
   Departed: QB Boomer Esiason now in Arizona and C Cal Dixon in Miami.
   
   Outlook: Coach Rich Kotite tries again, backed by big money invested
   in offense. Although scat-RB Adrian Murrell was retained (4 years, $6
   million deal), consistent power RB is sorely needed for unit that
   scored just two rushing TDs in '95. Johnson provides big-play
   potential , but it remains to be proven how effective O'Donnell can be
   without stellar support.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   OAKLAND
   
   Camp site: Marriott Hotel and Conference Center, Napa, Calif., July
   12, 17.
   
   1995 finish: 8-8, 5th in West.
   
   New faces: Ex-Dallas defenders T Russell Maryland and CB Larry Brown.
   Drafted TE Rickey Dudley. OL adds bodies with three ex-No. 1 tackles
   seeking revivals - Pat Harlow, Lincoln Kennedy and Charles McRae. Ss
   Darren Carrington and Lorenzo Lynch add depth.
   
   Departed: G Greg Skrepenak moved to Carolina. S Patrick Bates
   unretired for trade to Atlanta.
   
   Outlook: Talented squad started 8-2, then collapsed in '95. Internal
   bickering and QB Jeff Hostetler's shoulder injury were contributing
   factors. Offense needs to make more strides in coach Mike White's
   short passing game and get another big year from RB Harvey Williams.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   PITTSBURGH
   
   Camp: St. Vincent College, Latrobe, Pa., July 15, 18.
   
   1995 finish: 11-5, 1st in Central, lost Super Bowl XXX to Dallas.
   
   New faces: Power RB Jerome Bettis tries to rebound after draft-day
   trade from St. Louis. Steelers' power scheme should suit him well.
   Physical OL adds ex-Indianapolis OT Will Wolford, who switches to G;
   ex-Vikings OT Bernard Dafney; and No. 1 OT Jamaine Stephens. Much is
   expected quickly from ex-Penn State FB Jon Wittman, No. 3 pick.
   
   Departed: QB Neil O'Donnell and fired offensive coordinator Ron
   Erhart. OLB Kevin Greene opted for Carolina Panthers as free agent.
   Leon Searcy moved to Jacksonville Jaguars. FB John L. Williams wasn't
   re-signed and drug-convicted RB Bam Morris was cut.
   
   Outlook: Despite losses, talented team will remain in title hunt.
   Battle at quarterback between Jim Miller and Kordell Stewart looms,
   but given inexperience, position could be unsettled well into season.
   New coordinator Chan Gailey, promoted from receivers coach, lends
   optimism for smooth transition. Losing Greene expected. Now Steelers
   hope replacement Jason Gildon is as good as they think.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   SAN DIEGO
   
   Camp: University of California-San Diego, LaJolla, July 11, 13.
   
   1995 finish: 9-7, 2nd in West, lost wild-card playoff.
   
   New faces: Defense that got pushed around in playoff loss netted DE
   Marco Coleman from Miami, LB Kurt Gouveia from Philadelphia and
   ex-Atlanta S Kevin Ross. Top pick, second-round WR Bryan Still, adds
   speed to receiver corps.
   
   Departed: GM Bobby Beathard and coach Bobby Ross, perturbed by eroding
   work ethic and spirit among some key players, cleaned house. RB
   Natrone Means was cut, and no effort was made to prevent free-agent
   moves by DE Leslie O'Neal and RB Ronnie Harmon. WRs Mark Seay and
   Shawn Jefferson and TE Duane Young also expendable. RB Rodney Culver
   died in ValuJet crash.
   
   Outlook: To return to Super Bowl form, Chargers need huge
   contributions from young players such as second-year RBs Aaron Hayden
   and Terrell Fletcher. QB Stan Humphries has plenty of speed with wide
   receivers, but group's reliability is unproven. LB Junior Seau remains
   centerpiece of defense, which needs DE Chris Mims and DT Reuben Davis
   to rebound from off-years.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   SEATTLE
   
   Camp site: Seahawks Headquarters, Kirkland, Wash., July 16, 21.
   
   1995 finish: 8-8, 3rd in West.
   
   New faces: Draft-day deal to land DT Glenn Montgomery from Houston
   underlines disappointment in ex-No. 1 pick Sam Adams. Ex-Bengals S
   Darryl Williams lured to cut down on excessive big plays allowed. No.
   1 pick, G Pete Kendall, starts ASAP. Seahawks spent No. 2 pick on
   speedy Fred Thomas. WR Mike Pritchard was late signee.
   
   Departed: FS Eugene Robinson, OT Ray Roberts and LB Duane Bickett.
   
   Outlook: They're still in the Pacific Northwest, after owner Ken
   Behring's offseason attempt to move to the Los Angeles area was
   thwarted by the NFL, and Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen got option to
   buy team. Seahawks will again rely on RB Chris Warren to power rushing
   game ranked third in '95. To be legitimate contender, QB Rick Mirer
   needs to reverse regression evident with 20 INTs in '95. And defense
   that posted third-fewest sacks in '95 must develop pass rush.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
  NFC
  
   
   
   ARIZONA
   
   Camp: Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, July 18.
   
   1995 finish: 4-12, 5th in East.
   
   New faces: Coach Vince Tobin, who replaces Buddy Ryan. Boomer Esiason
   replaces Dave Krieg at QB. In free-agent T Lomas Brown, signed from
   Detroit, Cardinals get anchor on left side. Top pick Simeon Rice could
   start at DE. No. 2 pick Leeland McElroy puts oomph in return game. No.
   3 pick TE Johnny McWilliams should help.
   
   Departed: Ryan, who led the team to 10 wins in two seasons. Krieg.
   Free-agent C Ed Cunningham. T Larry Tharpe to New England as a free
   agent. S Lorenzo Lynch was released.
   
   Outlook: Cardinals need to show sense of a team concept, get defense
   organized (last vs. the run in '95) and develop a fan base. They'll
   struggle with payroll in aftermath of some of Ryan's signings, but the
   Cardinals are not without talent.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   ATLANTA
   
   Camp: Falcons headquarters, Suwanee, Ga., July 19.
   
   1995 finish: 9-7, 2nd in West. Lost in first round of playoffs.
   
   New faces: Acquisition of LB Cornelius Bennett, DE Dan Owens, LB James
   Williams and S Patrick Bates indicate a trend toward improving NFL's
   worst pass defense (and second-worst overall defense). Falcons need
   more pass rush (30 sacks) and better coverage in a pass-oriented
   division.
   
   Departed: DE Chris Doleman and team-high 91/2 sacks. S Kevin Ross'
   disagreements with coaching staff led to his release. Falcons traded S
   Roger Harper (Dallas), T Lincoln Kennedy (Oakland).
   
   Outlook: Falcons' last five games were decided by total of 14 points
   (three losses). Better defense will help. They need to get squared
   away at QB, where Jeff George is unsigned, and find a way to get that
   Red Gun offense to control time of possession and help the defense.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   CAROLINA
   
   Camp: Wofford College, Spartanburg, S.C., July 18.
   
   1995 finish: 7-9, 4th in West.
   
   New faces: Free-agent pickups CB Eric Davis, TE Wesley Walls, OT Greg
   Skrepenak and LBs Kevin Greene and Duane Bickett. Used No. 1 pick on
   much-needed RB, Tim Biakabutuka. New backup QB is Steve Beuerlein.
   
   Departed: TE Pete Metzelaars, OT Derrick Graham, RB Derrick Moore,
   backup QB Frank Reich, CB Rod Smith.
   
   Outlook: Panthers surprised with 7-9 mark in inaugural season. Defense
   might have to carry the Panthers again, at least in early going.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   CHICAGO
   
   Camp: Univ. of Wisconsin-Platteville, July 15.
   
   1995 finish: 9-7, 3rd in Central.
   
   New faces: Fiery MLB Bryan Cox signed as a free agent. C Ed Cunningham
   might wind up a starter after major defections along OL. Top pick Walt
   Harris is expected to beat out Jeremy Lincoln and start at CB.
   
   Departed: C-G Jay Leeuwenberg and backup OT Troy Auzenne signed with
   Colts and OT Scott Adams with Tampa Bay. WR Jeff Graham (82 catches,
   1,301 yards) signed with New York Jets. Backup QB Steve Walsh now in
   St. Louis.
   
   Outlook: Had 9-7 record the last three years but absent from the
   playoffs in '95, the Bears want to break out in a division defined by
   the passing game by playing better defense (ranked 27th in NFL in '95)
   and running football. Second-year RB Rashaan Salaam has a lot to learn
   before Bears dominate on ground. OL in flux and DL has plenty to
   prove. DE Alonzo Spellman and Cox must justify the big dollars.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   DALLAS
   
   Camp: St. Edward's Univ., Austin, Texas, July 18.
   
   1995 finish: 12-4, won Super Bowl.
   
   New faces: Capped-out Cowboys for most part stayed away from
   free-agent bidding. Brought in LBs Broderick Thomas (Minnesota) and
   Fred Strickland (Green Bay) to replace vanished starters. Traded down
   in draft, so highest pick is DE Kavika Pittman, a No. 2 from McNeese
   State. Third-round WR Stepfret Williams could surprise.
   
   Departed: LBs Robert Jones and Dixon Edwards, DT Russell Maryland, CBs
   Larry Brown and Robert Bailey, backup OL Ron Stone. Also lost trainer
   Kevin O'Neill to Miami and defensive assistant coach Jim Eddy to
   Detroit.
   
   Outlook: Pressure of seeking a fourth Super Bowl win in five years
   enormous, even for a team comfortable in the spotlight. Success still
   hangs on The Triplets - troubled WR Michael Irvin, RB Emmitt Smith and
   QB Troy Aikman. A star corps and solid role players carried the club
   the last few years. Now there are questions on both fronts.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   DETROIT
   
   Camp: Pontiac, Mich., July 15, 18.
   
   1995 finish: 10-6, 2nd in Central. Lost in first round of playoffs.
   
   New faces: Michael Brooks (New York Giants) moves in at MLB. Ray
   Roberts (Seattle) steps in at OLT. First-round draft picks LB Reggie
   Brown and G Jeff Hartings could start as rookies. Rich Camarillo is
   the new punter. Cagey veteran TE Pete Metzelaars adds bulk.
   
   Departed: Longtime LOT Lomas Brown left for Arizona. FS Willie Clay (8
   INTs) went to New England. LB Chris Spielman went to Buffalo, while LB
   Mike Johnson was released. Defense also lost key backups in LB Tracy
   Hayworth and DE Dan Owens, both to Atlanta.
   
   Outlook: Lions need to build on last year's close (excluding blowout
   playoff loss to Eagles) when they won seven in a row and outscored
   opponents 132-34 in final four. They're best positioned to challenge
   Green Bay in NFC Central.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   GREEN BAY
   
   Camp: St. Norbert College, West DePere, Wis., July 15-18.
   
   1995 finish: 11-5, 1st in Central. NFC runner-up.
   
   New faces: DT Santana Dotson (Tampa Bay) adds depth. LB Ron Cox fits
   the mold. No. 2 pick Derrick Mayes can help at WR right away. No. 4
   choice Chris Darkins adds speed at RB.
   
   Departed: Key loss is backup Ty Detmer. With Brett Favre coming back,
   depth is most important. Lost LB Fred Strickland and DT John Jurkovic
   to free agency, WRs Charles Jordan and Mark Ingram from the offense.
   TE Keith Jackson close to contract deal.
   
   Outlook: So much hinges on Favre, 1995 MVP, staying clean and healthy.
   He has thrown 71 TD passes last two seasons. Running game lacks
   outside speed and cannot take a game over, which puts pressure on the
   defense.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   MINNESOTA
   
   Camp: Mankato (Minn.) State Univ., July 21.
   
   1995 finish: 8-8, 4th in Central.
   
   New faces: Avoided high-priced talent, with exception of LB Dixon
   Edwards. CB Rod Smith figures in nickel or dime package. No. 1 pick
   Duane Clemons played DE at Cal but gets a shot at rush linebacker. No.
   2 pick James Manley fills a need at NT. RB Moe Williams, picked No. 3,
   joins crowded backfield.
   
   Departed: DE Roy Barker, who teased with potential but had only three
   sacks last year. Cut LBs Broderick Thomas and Jack Del Rio. Defensive
   coordinator Tony Dungy to Tampa Bay as coach.
   
   Outlook: Vikings lost four games by a TD or less and saw four games go
   to OT. They have to find out if oft-injured Robert Smith can be their
   every-down RB and help dominate games with ball control. Defense must
   continue to make big plays.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   NEW ORLEANS
   
   Camp: Univ. of Wisconsin-La Crosse, July 13, 15.
   
   1995 finish: 7-9, 5th in West.
   
   New faces: Saints signed free agents S Greg Jackson and CB Mark
   McMillian, who join ex-Eagles teammate Eric Allen. Added DEs Darren
   Mickell and pass-rushing Fred Stokes. Made CB Alex Molden top pick.
   Jim Haslett replaces Monte Kiffin as defensive coordinator.
   
   Departed: WR Quinn Early (Buffalo), TE Wesley Walls (Carolina), OT
   Richard Cooper (Philadelphia). That's three offensive starters. CB
   Jimmy Spencer to Cincinnati.
   
   Outlook: Saints lost first five games last year, four by a combined 12
   points. Saints finished 28th in rushing last year. Better defense and
   running game always were Mora's ticket.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   N.Y. GIANTS
   
   Camp: SUNY-Albany, Albany, N.Y., July 18.
   
   1995 finish: 5-11, 4th in East.
   
   New faces: Giants won bidding war for ex-Dallas OL Ron Stone (five
   years, $10 millin). Solid draft produced potential pass rusher in
   first round in Cedric Jones, big WR in Amani Toomer (No. 2) and
   hulking OLT in Roman Oben (No. 3). Danny Kanell, picked No. 4, looks
   like the No. 3 QB but could unseat Tommy Maddox.
   
   Departed: WR Mike Sherrard, starting OTs (Jumbo Elliott and Doug
   Riesenberg) and ill-used LB Michael Brooks. Cut S Vencie Glenn and RB
   Herschel Walker. Giants spent money retaining core veterans (QB Dave
   Brown, DLs Mike Strahan and Stacy Dillard, RB Rodney Hampton, CB
   Phillippi Sparks).
   
   Outlook: Hampton can't carry this team anymore. The Giants need speedy
   Thomas Lewis, their No. 1 pick in '94, to be productive. Brown needs
   to play in real time. Only two teams had fewer than the Giants' 29
   sacks last year, so a big-time rush means a lot.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   PHILADELPHIA
   
   Camp: Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa., July 17, 19.
   
   1995 finish: 10-6, 2nd in East. Lost in divisional playoff.
   
   New faces: QB Ty Detmer, knowledgeable in West Coast offense, should
   challenge starter Rodney Peete. OTs Richard Cooper (ex-New Orleans)
   and Steve Wallace (ex-49ers) help a line in transition. WR Irving
   Fryar steps in for Fred Barnett, who replaces him in Miami; could team
   with Mark Seay (ex-Charger) in rebuilt WR corps. CB Troy Vincent
   (ex-Miami) helps.
   
   Departed: Eagles released WR Calvin Williams, let Barnett go as a free
   agent, have not re-signed OG Guy McIntyre. Defense lost LBs Kurt
   Gouveia to San Diego, Bill Romanowski to Denver, CB Mark McMillian and
   S Greg Jackson to New Orleans, DE Daniel Stubbs to Miami, backup LB
   Derrick Oden to Miami. OL took hits with departure of OT Antone Davis
   (Atlanta) and backup Harry Boatswain to Jets.
   
   Outlook: Second-year coach Ray Rhodes seemed to will his team to
   victory in '95. Eagles were one of two teams in '95 with winning
   record while being outscored (San Diego was other) and can't expect
   similar success with that ratio. Seven of 10 wins came in division
   games, a key to reaching playoffs.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   ST. LOUIS
   
   Camp: Western Illinois Univ., Macomb, July 14, 18.
   
   1995 finish: 7-9, 3rd in West.
   
   New faces: RB Lawrence Phillips, Rams' top pick, a gamble. DE Leslie
   O'Neal adds sack power. LB Robert Jones has good range. QB Steve
   Walsh, so effective for Chicago in '94, replaces Chris Miller. No. 1
   pick Eddie Kennison might return kicks and add balance to WR corps. CB
   Maurice Hurst (neck surgery) could start.
   
   Departed: DE Sean Gilbert traded to Washington. Miller cut after
   failing physical (concussions). RB Jerome Bettis dealt to Pittsburgh.
   DE Fred Stokes to New Orleans. LB Shane Conlan still unsigned.
   
   Outlook: Second-year coach Rich Brooks got club off to fast start
   (4-0) but couldn't prevent a weak finish (0-3). Rams seek first
   winning season since 1989 in a division with other improving clubs.
   Phillips looks like the make-or-break guy.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   SAN FRANCISCO
   
   Camp site: Sierra College, Rocklin, Calif., July 17, 20.
   
   1995 finish: 11-5, 1st in West. Lost in divisional playoff.
   
   New faces: DE Chris Doleman (ex-Atlanta) fills need for outside
   rusher. CB Eric Carter, a standout in Canada, should help replace Eric
   Davis. OG Ray Brown adds size and muscle. RBs Johnny Johnson and Tommy
   Vardell add backbone in ground game. Ex-coach Bill Walsh returns in
   administrative capacity to oversee offense.
   
   Departed: Pro Bowl C Bart Oates retired, as did DE Rickey Jackson. DE
   Alfred Williams signed with Denver. Davis signed with Carolina. DE
   Dennis Brown, OT Steve Wallace both cut.
   
   Outlook: 49ers reacted with horror after playoff loss to Green Bay.
   Offense can put up big numbers but now respects the concept of the
   ground game. When they won Super Bowl two years ago, starting CBs were
   Davis and Deion Sanders. Now? Marquez Pope and probably Tyronne
   Drakeford.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   TAMPA BAY
   
   Camp: Univ. of Tampa, July 21.
   
   1995 finish: 7-9, 5th in Central.
   
   New faces: Tony Dungy gets overdue shot as coach. First three draft
   choices (DE Regan Upshaw, DT Marcus Jones, FB Mike Alstott) could all
   start. Bucs weren't very active in chasing other teams' free agents,
   concentrated on re-signing their own, especially MLB Hardy Nickerson.
   
   Departed: OL Charles McRae, a busted No. 1, to Oakland. DTs Santana
   Dotson (Green Bay) and Mark Wheeler (New England). Ex-coach Sam Wyche
   to NBC. S Curtis Buckley to San Francisco.
   
   Outlook: Dungy's defenses create turnovers and make big plays. If RB
   Errict Rhett reaches contract accord, Bucs could combine better
   defense with pounding ground game and take pressure off QB Trent
   Dilfer. Ready to contend? Not yet. But don't bet against Dungy's
   understated style and motivational skills.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   
   WASHINGTON
   
   Camp site: Frostburg (Md.) State Univ., July 17.
   
   1995 finish: 6-10, 3rd in East.
   
   New faces: DT Sean Gilbert (trade with St. Louis for No. 1 pick) puts
   muscle and mass into middle of line. Bob Dahl (ex-Cleveland) starts at
   RG. Bill Brooks (ex-Buffalo) can be an effective third WR. RB Stephen
   Davis, a No. 4 pick, could get a long look if Terry Allen's contract
   impasse stretches.
   
   Departed: OT Jim Lachey (shoulder) failed a physical at minicamp and
   retired. G Ray Brown signed with San Francisco. Reserve OL Vernice
   Smith signed with Jets. DT Tim Johnson probably won't return.
   
   Outlook: Both lines look big and powerful, but OL needs time to shape
   up with Tre Johnson moving to LG and Cory Raymer battling John Gesek
   at C. Coach Norv Turner needs a QB to win the job decisively. Core of
   veterans (CB Darrell Green, RB Brian Mitchell, LB Ken Harvey) hunger.
   
9.4455MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jul 11 1996 14:4116
    
    
    
    
       re .4453
    
        You boys have to actually win something before I have
       to eat any crow. The Steelers have done a much better 
       job than the vast majority of AFC clubs but that hasn't 
       translated into any new SB rings. As it is, the 
       Steelers won't get back to the SB this year. No way. In 
       fact, they'll have their hands full trying to win the lowly 
       AFC Central. If the Steelers win the SB this year, I'll 
       show up at the first get together at the OPP afterwards 
       wearing a prom dress and sing 'Kumbaya'.     
    
9.4456YUCK!MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu Jul 11 1996 14:478
>If the Steelers win the SB this year, I'll show up at the first get 
>together at the OPP afterwards wearing a prom dress and sing 'Kumbaya'.   
  
    This looks to be my first year of rooting _against_ the
    Steelers.  Especially if this is their reward.


    billl
9.4457a real stretchHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jul 11 1996 14:539
Wow, a real stretch there, Tommy. The simple arithmetic odds are 29-1
against this proposition.

Considering that they've lost about ever one of their backfield and some
of their lines and defense, I'd say that getting to the SB should merit
some performance in drag. Getting to the AFC championship game oughta be
worth some lipstick and rouge.

TTom
9.4458MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jul 11 1996 15:156
    
      The Vegas odds are 10-1 and they are one of the co-favorites
     in the AFC (the Dolphins being the other). Yup, the Steelers
     suffered losses, O'Donnell being the only real big one, but
     losing him won't hurt all that much. They still play very good 
     smashmouth football in a weak division. 
9.4459could be interestingHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jul 11 1996 15:5315
re: favored for AFC

The whole conference is definitely up in the air. With the current
structure of free agency, it's impossible to keep a team intact.

Pittsburgh is not the onliest team to lose key players which partially
explains how anyone could possibly list 'em as a favorite. I can see
Miami if for no other reason than Jimmy Johnson. 

One up and comer that may be fun to watch is the second year Jaguars.
They've added Natone Means to add some punch to one of the worse
offensives and have strengthene their already good D with drafts and free
agency.

TTom
9.4460MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jul 11 1996 16:5129

   Pre-preseason predicitions:

      AFC East: Miami
      AFC Central: Cincinnati
      AFC West: Oakland
      Wildcards: Pittsburgh, New England
      On the come: Jets
      MVP: Dan Marino
      Defensive Player Of The Year: Hugh Douglas, NYJ
      Offensive Rookie Of The Year: Jonathan Ogden, Ravens 
      Defensive Rookie Of The Year: Darryl Gardener, Miami
      AFC Champ: Miami


      NFC East: Cowboys
      NFC Central: Detroit
      NFC West: San Fran
      Wildcards: GB, TB
      On the come: Jacksonville
      MVP:  Herman Moore, Detroit
      Defensive Player Of The Year: Eric Swann, Arizona
      Offensive Rookie Of The Year: Tim Biakabutuka, Carolina
      Defensive Rookie Of The Year: Cedric Jones, NYG
      NFC Champ: Detroit
   
      Super Bowl Champ: Miami
    
9.4461nice picksHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jul 11 1996 17:119
Miami to beat Detroit to win it all? Is this crow bait? :-]

One minor nit into a_otherwise fine effort or prognositicting:

>      Offensive Rookie Of The Year: Tim Biakabutuka, Carolina

That be his adopted name. He's gone back to the original Tshimanga.

TTom
9.4462MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jul 11 1996 18:0915
  >> Miami to beat Detroit to win it all? Is this crow bait? :-]

     I couldn't very well pick Miami vs. Dallas like I'm sure
     90% of the pundits will. Or Aikman, Young or Favre for
     NFC MVP.

  >> He's gone back to the original Tshimanga.

     He can call himself Ishmael but no matter, he's fine back
     without the excess baggage of Lawrence Philips. Another guy
     that I think will be a fine pro is OT Pete Kendall from Boston
     College. 
    
    
9.4463need some help on DHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jul 11 1996 18:1813
I withca Tommy.

Detroit aint a half bad option. I don't see Miami getting there unless
there's some miraculous transition on the defensive of things. The Fish
lost Bryan Cox, which may help with the head case but he's a helluva LB,
Marco Coleman, another LB and CB Troy Vincent.

It looks like Del Rio is pencilled in for the middle. BTW, lasted year as
a commentator, Johnson said that he was sorry when Del Rio left the
Cowboys cause he woulda been his starter at MLB, presumably instead of
Ken Norton.

TTom
9.4464even JJ can't make diamonds outa horse dungMKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu Jul 11 1996 19:437
> I can see Miami if for no other reason than Jimmy Johnson. 

	Didn't we hear the same about the Pats and Parcells
	in his "rookie" year?


	billl
9.4465MFGFIN::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Fri Jul 12 1996 00:1123
        The top 4/conference before preseason.   After preseason, I will
    make other predictions since preseason injuries usually takes out
    good players which will effect teams.
    
    AFC:
    
    Miami, KC, Pitt, Buff (ick)....My bronco's will be close, but still
                                   need defense, as does the fish, but
    				   their offense will be # 1-3.
    
    
    NFC:
    
    Dallas, GB, SF, Phil.     
    
    
    SB:  NFC just do to track record.
    
    
      I think/hope the AFC will win one in next 2 years since FA is
    balancing the conferences little by little.
    
    Tim
9.4466Let's just get it over with nowFABSIX::D_HORTERTFri Jul 12 1996 03:0217
    Tommy Brydie, I'm not going to argue with you this season about the
    Pittsburgh Steelers.  Instead we are going to make the first 3 p-name
    bets of the NFL season right now.
    
       1st:  Pittsburgh will win the AFC Central
    
       2nd:  Pittsburgh will win the AFC Championship game
    
       3rd:  Pittsburgh will win the Super Bowl (especially if they get to
             play Detroit.)
    
    P-names will last for 2 weeks with a minimum of 10 entries per week.
    I know you will accept these 3 wages since you will lose a lot of
    "face" and credibility in here if you don't.
    
    
                                                             D.J.
9.4467IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Jul 12 1996 12:453
  >> He's gone back to the original Tshimanga.

We'll see how long this lasts come endorsement time...
9.4468not fer sureHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jul 12 1996 13:538
A foreign/ethnic/doesn't-sound-merkin name ain't the barrier it used to
be. I think ever one should thank Kareem for being on forefront for that.

And Ahmad Rashad is doing pretty good after growing up as Bobby Moore.

And even close there's that Ki-Jana guy in Chicago.

TTom
9.4469SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townFri Jul 12 1996 13:586
         <<< Note 9.4468 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>
                               -< not fer sure >-

>And even close there's that Ki-Jana guy in Chicago.

Cincy.
9.4470there and anotherHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jul 12 1996 14:013
There too :-]

... and Rashann Salaam is in Chicago, yet.
9.4471some signingsHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jul 12 1996 17:2916
Meanwhile in the NFL a couple of transcations of note.

Herschel Walker has signed on with the Cowboys. He's gonna be a 3rd down
specialist who may play special teams. Rumor is that his job will be to
watch after Michael Irvin if'n Irvin gets out.

Keith Jackson re-signed with Green Bay for a couple of years.

And Big Bad John Elway says that he may retire in a couple of years and
not play the full 5 that he recently re-upped for. Of course, there's the
remote prospect that the Donk might win something.

The 49ers signed identical twin brothers Sean and Sam Manual to identical
contracts. Word is that they'll wear identical numbers.

TTom
9.4472PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jul 12 1996 17:321
9.4473maybeHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jul 12 1996 17:3617
... not yet.

He stayed outta jail but he has to do some community time and he's in
effect on probation for 6 years. I wonder what the odds are on whether or
not he can keep it together that long.

In a_interview, he made it out like Cowher was out to get him and just
waiting for something like cocaine distribution for a reason.

In any case, if'n Bam can toe the line, the charges will be dropped.

Maybe somebody will field a team with all these guys like Larry Phillips,
Eric Green, Barry Foster, etc.

Y'all sure Albert Belle aint a football players?

TTom
9.4474where he'll stop nobody knowsMFGFIN::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Fri Jul 12 1996 22:145
      Hershel is back in Dallas.  The full circle for his nfl career is
    complete.  The funny thing is, Emmitt was one of the #1 picks that the
    vikes gave for Hershel.
    
      Tim
9.4475NFL ScheduleYIELD::BARBIERIMon Jul 15 1996 12:263
      Is there a posting of the NFL schedule anywhere???
    
    					Tony
9.4476such as it isHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jul 15 1996 14:33363
 --------------------------------------------------------------------

                1996 NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE SCHEDULE
                           (ALL TIMES LOCAL)

                 SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 1 (FIRST WEEKEND)
                        NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  1. ARIZONA AT INDIANAPOLIS                             12:00
  2. ATLANTA AT CAROLINA                                 1:00
  3. CINCINNATI AT ST LOUIS                              12:00
  4. DETROIT AT MINNESOTA                                12:00
  5. GREEN BAY AT TAMPA BAY                              4:00
  6. KANSAS CITY AT HOUSTON                              12:00
  7. NEW ENGLAND AT MIAMI                                4:00
  8. NEW ORLEANS AT SAN FRANCISCO                        1:00
  9. NEW YORK JETS AT DENVER                             2:00
  10. OAKLAND AT BALTIMORE                               1:00
  11. PHILADELPHIA AT WASHINGTON                         1:00
  12. PITTSBURGH AT JACKSONVILLE                         1:00
  13. SEATTLE AT SAN DIEGO                               1:00
                      SUNDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 1
  14. BUFFALO AT NEW YORK GIANTS                         8:00
                          MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 2
  15. DALLAS AT CHICAGO                                  8:00

                 SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 8 (SECOND WEEKEND)
                        FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  16. BALTIMORE AT PITTSBURGH                              1:00
  17. CAROLINA AT NEW ORLEANS                              12:00
  18. CHICAGO AT WASHINGTON                                1:00
  19. CINCINNATI AT SAN DIEGO                              1:00
  20. DENVER AT SEATTLE                                    1:00
  21. HOUSTON AT JACKSONVILLE                              1:00
  22. INDIANAPOLIS AT NEW YORK JETS                        1:00
  23. MINNESOTA AT ATLANTA                                 1:00
  24. NEW ENGLAND AT BUFFALO                               1:00
  25. NEW YORK GIANTS AT DALLAS                            3:00
  26. OAKLAND AT KANSAS CITY                               12:00
  27. ST LOUIS  AT SAN FRANCISCO                           1:00
  28. TAMPA BAY AT DETROIT                                 1:00
                      SUNDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 8
  29. MIAMI AT ARIZONA                                     5:00
                          MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9
  30. PHILADELPHIA AT GREEN BAY                            8:00

                 SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 15 (THIRD WEEKEND)
      (OPEN DATES: ATLANTA, CAROLINA, ST LOUIS , SAN FRANCISCO)
                        NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  31. ARIZONA AT NEW ENGLAND                              1:00
  32. BALTIMORE AT HOUSTON                                12:00
  33. DETROIT AT PHILADELPHIA                             1:00
  34. INDIANAPOLIS AT DALLAS                              3:00
  35. JACKSONVILLE AT OAKLAND                             1:00
  36. KANSAS CITY AT SEATTLE                              1:00
  37. MINNESOTA AT CHICAGO                                12:00
  38. NEW ORLEANS AT CINCINNATI                           1:00
  39. NEW YORK JETS AT MIAMI                              1:00
  40. SAN DIEGO AT GREEN BAY                              12:00
  41. WASHINGTON AT NEW YORK GIANTS                       4:00
                      SUNDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 15
  42. TAMPA BAY AT DENVER                                 6:00
                         MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16
  43. BUFFALO AT PITTSBURGH                               9:00

                 SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 22 (FOURTH WEEKEND)
       (OPEN DATES: BALTIMORE, CINCINNATI, HOUSTON, PITTSBURGH)
                        FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  44. ARIZONA AT NEW ORLEANS                               12:00
  45. CHICAGO AT DETROIT                                   4:00
  46. DALLAS AT BUFFALO                                    4:00
  47. DENVER AT KANSAS CITY                                12:00
  48. GREEN BAY AT MINNESOTA                               12:00
  49. JACKSONVILLE AT NEW ENGLAND                          4:00
  50. NEW YORK GIANTS AT NEW YORK JETS                     1:00
  51. SAN DIEGO AT OAKLAND                                 1:00
  52. SAN FRANCISCO AT CAROLINA                            1:00
  53. SEATTLE AT TAMPA BAY                                 1:00
  54. WASHINGTON AT ST LOUIS                               12:00
                      SUNDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 22
  55. PHILADELPHIA AT ATLANTA                              8:00
                         MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 23
  56. MIAMI AT INDIANAPOLIS                                8:00

                 SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 29 (FIFTH WEEKEND)
       (OPEN DATES: BUFFALO, INDIANAPOLIS, MIAMI, NEW ENGLAND)
                        FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  57. ATLANTA AT SAN FRANCISCO                             1:00
  58. CAROLINA AT JACKSONVILLE                             1:00
  59. DENVER AT CINCINNATI                                 1:00
  60. DETROIT AT TAMPA BAY                                 1:00
  61. GREEN BAY AT SEATTLE                                 1:00
  62. HOUSTON AT PITTSBURGH                                1:00
  63. KANSAS CITY AT SAN DIEGO                             1:00
  64. MINNESOTA AT NEW YORK GIANTS                         1:00
  65. NEW ORLEANS AT BALTIMORE                             1:00
  66. OAKLAND AT CHICAGO                                   12:00
  67. ST LOUIS  AT ARIZONA                                 1:00
                      SUNDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 29
  68. NEW YORK JETS AT WASHINGTON                          8:00
                         MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 30
  69. DALLAS AT PHILADELPHIA                               9:00

                   SUNDAY, OCTOBER 6 (SIXTH WEEKEND)
   (OPEN DATES: ARIZONA, DALLAS, NY GIANTS, PHILADELPHIA, TAMPA BAY,
                             WASHINGTON)
                        NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  70. ATLANTA AT DETROIT                                 1:00
  71. CAROLINA AT MINNESOTA                              12:00
  72. GREEN BAY AT CHICAGO                               12:00
  73. INDIANAPOLIS AT BUFFALO                            4:00
  74. JACKSONVILLE AT NEW ORLEANS                        3:00
  75. NEW ENGLAND AT BALTIMORE                           1:00
  76. OAKLAND AT NEW YORK JETS                           1:00
  77. SAN DIEGO AT DENVER                                2:00
  78. SAN FRANCISCO AT ST LOUIS                          3:00
  79. SEATTLE AT MIAMI                                   1:00
                        SUNDAY NIGHT, OCTOBER 6
  80. HOUSTON AT CINCINNATI                              8:00
                           MONDAY, OCTOBER 7
  81. PITTSBURGH AT KANSAS CITY                          8:00

                 SUNDAY, OCTOBER 13 (SEVENTH WEEKEND)
        (OPEN DATES: DENVER, KANSAS CITY, SAN DIEGO, SEATTLE)
                        FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  82. ARIZONA AT DALLAS                                     12:00
  83. CHICAGO AT NEW ORLEANS                                12:00
  84. CINCINNATI AT PITTSBURGH                              1:00
  85. DETROIT AT OAKLAND                                    1:00
  86. HOUSTON AT ATLANTA                                    1:00
  87. MIAMI AT BUFFALO                                      1:00
  88. MINNESOTA AT TAMPA BAY                                1:00
  89. NEW YORK JETS AT JACKSONVILLE                         1:00
  90. PHILADELPHIA AT NEW YORK GIANTS                       4:00
  91. ST LOUIS  AT CAROLINA                                 1:00
  92. WASHINGTON AT NEW ENGLAND                             1:00
                       SUNDAY NIGHT, OCTOBER 13
  93. BALTIMORE AT INDIANAPOLIS                             7:00
                          MONDAY, OCTOBER 14
  94. SAN FRANCISCO AT GREEN BAY                            8:00

                 THURSDAY, OCTOBER 17 (EIGHTH WEEKEND)
         (OPEN DATES: CHICAGO, DETROIT, GREEN BAY, MINNESOTA)
                        NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  95. SEATTLE AT KANSAS CITY                              7:00
                          SUNDAY, OCTOBER 20
  96. ATLANTA AT DALLAS                                   12:00
  97. BALTIMORE AT DENVER                                 2:00
  98. BUFFALO AT NEW YORK JETS                            4:00
  99. CINCINNATI AT SAN FRANCISCO                         1:00
  100. JACKSONVILLE AT ST LOUIS                           3:00
  101. MIAMI AT PHILADELPHIA                              1:00
  102. NEW ENGLAND AT INDIANAPOLIS                        12:00
  103. NEW ORLEANS AT CAROLINA                            1:00
  104. NEW YORK GIANTS AT WASHINGTON                      1:00
  105. PITTSBURGH AT HOUSTON                              3:00
  106. TAMPA BAY AT ARIZONA                               1:00
                          MONDAY, OCTOBER 21
  107. OAKLAND AT SAN DIEGO                               6:00

                  SUNDAY, OCTOBER 27 (NINTH WEEKEND)
                  (OPEN DATES: NEW ORLEANS, OAKLAND)
                        FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  108. CAROLINA AT PHILADELPHIA                            1:00
  109. DALLAS AT MIAMI                                     4:00
  110. INDIANAPOLIS AT WASHINGTON                          1:00
  111. JACKSONVILLE AT CINCINNATI                          1:00
  112. KANSAS CITY AT DENVER                               2:00
  113. NEW YORK GIANTS AT DETROIT                          1:00
  114. NEW YORK JETS AT ARIZONA                            2:00
  115. PITTSBURGH AT ATLANTA                               1:00
  116. ST LOUIS  AT BALTIMORE                              1:00
  117. SAN DIEGO AT SEATTLE                                1:00
  118. SAN FRANCISCO AT HOUSTON                            12:00
  119. TAMPA BAY AT GREEN BAY                              12:00
                       SUNDAY NIGHT, OCTOBER 27
  120. BUFFALO AT NEW ENGLAND                              8:00
                          MONDAY, OCTOBER 28
  121. CHICAGO AT MINNESOTA                                8:00

                  SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 3 (TENTH WEEKEND)
                 (OPEN DATES: JACKSONVILLE, NY JETS)
                        NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  122. ARIZONA AT NEW YORK GIANTS                         1:00
  123. CAROLINA AT ATLANTA                                1:00
  124. CINCINNATI AT BALTIMORE                            1:00
  125. DETROIT AT GREEN BAY                               12:00
  126. HOUSTON AT SEATTLE                                 1:00
  127. KANSAS CITY AT MINNESOTA                           12:00
  128. MIAMI AT NEW ENGLAND                               4:00
  129. PHILADELPHIA AT DALLAS                             12:00
  130. ST LOUIS  AT PITTSBURGH                            1:00
  131. SAN DIEGO AT INDIANAPOLIS                          1:00
  132. TAMPA BAY AT CHICAGO                               12:00
  133. WASHINGTON AT BUFFALO                              4:00
                       SUNDAY NIGHT, NOVEMBER 3
  134. SAN FRANCISCO AT NEW ORLEANS                       7:00
                          MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4
  135. DENVER AT OAKLAND                                  6:00

                SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 10 (ELEVENTH WEEKEND)
                        FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  136. ARIZONA AT WASHINGTON                              1:00
  137. ATLANTA AT ST LOUIS                                12:00
  138. BALTIMORE AT JACKSONVILLE                          4:00
  139. BUFFALO AT PHILADELPHIA                            1:00
  140. CHICAGO AT DENVER                                  2:00
  141. DALLAS AT SAN FRANCISCO                            1:00
  142. GREEN BAY AT KANSAS CITY                           12:00
  143. HOUSTON AT NEW ORLEANS                             12:00
  144. INDIANAPOLIS AT MIAMI                              1:00
  145. MINNESOTA AT SEATTLE                               1:00
  146. NEW ENGLAND AT NEW YORK JETS                       1:00
  147. OAKLAND AT TAMPA BAY                               1:00
  148. PITTSBURGH AT CINCINNATI                           1:00
                       SUNDAY NIGHT, NOVEMBER 10
  149. NEW YORK GIANTS AT CAROLINA                        8:00
                          MONDAY, NOVEMBER 11
  150. DETROIT AT SAN DIEGO                               6:00

                SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 17 (TWELFTH WEEKEND)
                        NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  151. BALTIMORE AT SAN FRANCISCO                          1:00
  152. CAROLINA AT ST LOUIS                                12:00
  153. CHICAGO AT KANSAS CITY                              12:00
  154. CINCINNATI AT BUFFALO                               1:00
  155. DENVER AT NEW ENGLAND                               1:00
  156. JACKSONVILLE AT PITTSBURGH                          1:00
  157. MIAMI AT HOUSTON                                    3:00
  158. NEW ORLEANS AT ATLANTA                              1:00
  159. NEW YORK GIANTS AT ARIZONA                          2:00
  160. NEW YORK JETS AT INDIANAPOLIS                       1:00
  161. SEATTLE AT DETROIT                                  1:00
  162. TAMPA BAY AT SAN DIEGO                              1:00
  163. WASHINGTON AT PHILADELPHIA                          1:00
                       SUNDAY NIGHT, NOVEMBER 17
  164. MINNESOTA AT OAKLAND                                5:00
                          MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18
  165. GREEN BAY AT DALLAS                                 8:00

               SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 24 (THIRTEENTH WEEKEND)
                        FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  166. ATLANTA AT CINCINNATI                               1:00
  167. CAROLINA AT HOUSTON                                 12:00
  168. DALLAS AT NEW YORK GIANTS                           4:00
  169. DENVER AT MINNESOTA                                 12:00
  170. DETROIT AT CHICAGO                                  12:00
  171. INDIANAPOLIS AT NEW ENGLAND                         1:00
  172. JACKSONVILLE AT BALTIMORE                           1:00
  173. NEW ORLEANS AT TAMPA BAY                            1:00
  174. NEW YORK JETS AT BUFFALO                            1:00
  175. OAKLAND AT SEATTLE                                  1:00
  176. PHILADELPHIA AT ARIZONA                             2:00
  177. SAN DIEGO AT KANSAS CITY                            12:00
  178. SAN FRANCISCO AT WASHINGTON                         1:00
                       SUNDAY NIGHT, NOVEMBER 24
  179. GREEN BAY AT ST LOUIS                               7:00
                          MONDAY, NOVEMBER 25
  180. PITTSBURGH AT MIAMI                                 9:00

              THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 28 (FOURTEENTH WEEKEND)
                        NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  181. KANSAS CITY AT DETROIT                               12:30
  182. WASHINGTON AT DALLAS                                 3:00
                          SUNDAY, DECEMBER 1
  183. ARIZONA AT MINNESOTA                                 12:00
  184. BUFFALO AT INDIANAPOLIS                              1:00
  185. CHICAGO AT GREEN BAY                                 12:00
  186. CINCINNATI AT JACKSONVILLE                           1:00
  187. HOUSTON AT NEW YORK JETS                             4:00
  188. MIAMI AT OAKLAND                                     1:00
  189. NEW YORK GIANTS AT PHILADELPHIA                      1:00
  190. PITTSBURGH AT BALTIMORE                              1:00
  191. ST LOUIS  AT NEW ORLEANS                             3:00
  192. SEATTLE AT DENVER                                    2:00
  193. TAMPA BAY AT CAROLINA                                1:00
                       SUNDAY NIGHT, DECEMBER 1
  194. NEW ENGLAND AT SAN DIEGO                             5:00
                          MONDAY, DECEMBER 2
  195. SAN FRANCISCO AT ATLANTA                             9:00

               THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5 (FIFTEENTH WEEKEND)
                        FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  196. PHILADELPHIA AT INDIANAPOLIS                       8:00
                          SUNDAY, DECEMBER 8
  197. ATLANTA AT NEW ORLEANS                             12:00
  198. BALTIMORE AT CINCINNATI                            1:00
  199. BUFFALO AT SEATTLE                                 1:00
  200. CAROLINA AT SAN FRANCISCO                          1:00
  201. DALLAS AT ARIZONA                                  2:00
  202. DENVER AT GREEN BAY                                12:00
  203. JACKSONVILLE AT HOUSTON                            12:00
  204. NEW YORK GIANTS AT MIAMI                           1:00
  205. NEW YORK JETS AT NEW ENGLAND                       4:00
  206. ST LOUIS  AT CHICAGO                               12:00
  207. SAN DIEGO AT PITTSBURGH                            1:00
  208. WASHINGTON AT TAMPA BAY                            1:00
                       SUNDAY NIGHT, DECEMBER 8
  209. MINNESOTA AT DETROIT                               8:00
                          MONDAY, DECEMBER 9
  210. KANSAS CITY AT OAKLAND                             6:00

              SATURDAY, DECEMBER 14 (SIXTEENTH WEEKEND)
                        NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  211. PHILADELPHIA AT NEW YORK JETS                      12:30
  212. SAN DIEGO AT CHICAGO                               3:00
                          SUNDAY, DECEMBER 15
  213. BALTIMORE AT CAROLINA                              1:00
  214. CINCINNATI AT HOUSTON                              12:00
  215. GREEN BAY AT DETROIT                               1:00
  216. INDIANAPOLIS AT KANSAS CITY                        12:00
  217. NEW ENGLAND AT DALLAS                              12:00
  218. NEW ORLEANS AT NEW YORK GIANTS                     1:00
  219. OAKLAND AT DENVER                                  2:00
  220. ST LOUIS  AT ATLANTA                               1:00
  221. SAN FRANCISCO AT PITTSBURGH                        1:00
  222. TAMPA BAY AT MINNESOTA                             12:00
  223. WASHINGTON AT ARIZONA                              2:00
                       SUNDAY NIGHT, DECEMBER 15
  224. SEATTLE AT JACKSONVILLE                            8:00
                          MONDAY, DECEMBER 16
  225. BUFFALO AT MIAMI                                   9:00

             SATURDAY, DECEMBER 21 (SEVENTEENTH WEEKEND)
                        FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
  226. NEW ENGLAND AT NEW YORK GIANTS                       12:30
  227. NEW ORLEANS AT ST LOUIS                              3:00
                          SUNDAY, DECEMBER 22
  228. ARIZONA AT PHILADELPHIA                              1:00
  229. ATLANTA AT JACKSONVILLE                              1:00
  230. CHICAGO AT TAMPA BAY                                 1:00
  231. DALLAS AT WASHINGTON                                 4:00
  232. HOUSTON AT BALTIMORE                                 1:00
  233. INDIANAPOLIS AT CINCINNATI                           1:00
  234. KANSAS CITY AT BUFFALO                               1:00
  235. MIAMI AT NEW YORK JETS                               1:00
  236. MINNESOTA AT GREEN BAY                               12:00
  237. PITTSBURGH AT CAROLINA                               1:00
  238. SEATTLE AT OAKLAND                                   1:00
                       SUNDAY NIGHT, DECEMBER 22
  239. DENVER AT SAN DIEGO                                  5:00
                          MONDAY, DECEMBER 23
  240. DETROIT AT SAN FRANCISCO                             6:00

                              POSTSEASON

  Saturday, Dec. 28    AFC and NFC Wild Card Playoffs       (ABC)

  Sunday, Dec. 29      AFC and NFC Wild Card Playoffs     (NBC and
                                                            FOX)

  Saturday, Jan. 4    AFC and NFC Divisional Playoffs     (NBC and
                                                            FOX)

  Sunday, Jan. 5      AFC and NFC Divisional Playoffs     (NBC and
                                                            FOX)

  Sunday, Jan. 12      AFC and NFC Championship Games     (NBC and
                                                            FOX)

  Sunday, Jan. 26   Super Bowl XXXI at the Superdome in     (FOX)
                                New Orleans
  Sunday, Feb. 2    AFC-NFC Pro Bowl at Honolulu, Hawaii    (ABC)

9.4477Steinberg making some bucks, tooHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jul 15 1996 19:1112
re: all this talk about the NBA free agents...

Wail, it's free agent season in the NFL too and lest we think that Falk
is a point off the curve in terms of controlling a bunch of money, Lee
Steinberg, the premier NFL agent who manages, among others, Painters' QB
Kerry Collins, has already close deals in excess of 137 million. His cut,
a nifty 5+ mil and the count and amount continue to go up.

This all comes to a_end tomorrow when the Free Agency sweepstakes is
over.

TTom
9.4478PECAD8::CHILDSTue Jul 16 1996 11:158
Irvin cops a plea suprise suprise....Now he can go back to the White House for
a month party his ass off and get clean before october when he takes the field.
The NFL has to  give him the minimun 4 weeks off or loose all credibility with
fans and players a like. Missing 4 games ought to cost him first round status
in a few FFL leagues. 

mike
9.4479BIGQ::MCKAYTue Jul 16 1996 12:006
    he's never been a first rounder, at least not in an eight team league.
    Just another Cowboy FFL stiff like Troy boy.
    
    Emitt is THE FFL GOD
    
    Jimbo
9.4480one of my favsHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jul 16 1996 12:2611
Curb your tongue, knave.

I got Irvin in FFL_C and he's a main among receivers. Lasted year his TDs
dropped but I'd put him agin most of 'em over any period of time.

Emmitt and Rice are both already in the FFLHoF.

FWIW, my other wide out is footloose and fancy free Andre "I'd rather
make nothin than a lousy million" Rison.

TTom
9.4481TPSYS::BROOKSTue Jul 16 1996 14:489
    This was kind of a Joke from the get go, the drugs were found in the
    room but not on Michael so I had a feeling he would get off clean.  The
    plea bargin was to end it quickly if it went to trial he may have
    got an even smaller sentence...
    
    Now on the NFL rules, he did not fail a drug test and was not arrested
    with drugs on his possesion, does his plea bargin of pleading No
    Contest to a lesser charge carry an automatic 4 game suspension for
    1st offenders ?
9.4482SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townTue Jul 16 1996 14:558
Right. He pleaded it out to avoid a trial where he could have 
been found guilty and done some serious time. 

Tell you what, you get caught in a motel room with a couple 
hookers and some blow and tell the cops it's not yours and you're 
completely innocent. You really think you'd walk?

daryll
9.4483happensHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jul 16 1996 15:0610
If'n you're a firsted offender and not a celebrity and someone else
claims the stuff is theirs, there is a good chance that you could walk.

Once the stuff is claimed, there's only minor stuff they can get you on
anyway.

Laws vary from state to state but in NC most likely you'd walk, either
free or cheap.

TTom
9.4484TPSYS::BROOKSTue Jul 16 1996 15:5322
    A good friend of mine got busted in a sting attempting to buy Coke
    and got probation (1st offense).  And I know several other that were
    pulled over for speeding and then got charged with possesion of a
    class D (I beleive thats what they call coke) and both got just 
    probation (1st offense).
    
    I would guess that 99% of all offenders busted for there 1st offense
    on JUST POSSESION CHARGES (Not a large enough bust to tack on Dealing)
    get probation/fine and go home.  Read the police beat for the local
    towns and you see a string of arrests for possesion do you think they
    all go to jail ?  I dont condone drug usage but I do know a handful
    of people that smoke grass and/or do coke and even though I think there
    foolish I don't consider them HardCore criminals that should be locked
    up.... 
    
    Now what they should do is simple change the law and say OK if you
    arrested for possesion you simple go to jail until you give us the
    name and testify against the person you got it from.. So as you
    work you way up the ladder someone either keeps rolling over on the
    next step up or spends there life in Jail :-)
    
    								MaB
9.4485PECAD8::CHILDSTue Jul 16 1996 16:034
 What they should do is legalize the stuff. Why is ok to put alcohol in your
 system but not pot or heroin for that matter? Sure would save the taxpayers
 a hell of lot money. Less court cases, decrease the need to build more jails,
 the need to hire more cops etc etc wow..........
9.4486Or maybe that is a social issueEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jul 16 1996 16:069
    
> What they should do is legalize the stuff. Why is ok to put alcohol in your
> system but not pot or heroin for that matter? 
    
    I don't care about the social issues; I just wanted Michael Irvin
    out of my system...
    
    glenn
    
9.4487Legalizing it would be the easy way outTPSYS::BROOKSTue Jul 16 1996 16:1313
    -2, Ive tossed around the idea in my head and said similiar things
    but If you look at the death's caused/related to alcohol would you
    really want to increase that by having 3 to 5 times more people 
    behind the wheel of a car with no control....
    
    Ya legalizing drugs would possible cut down on drug related crimes
    /deaths but they would increase on the other end...
    
    But hey the kids today don't need these drugs when they can just
    Inhale glade.???????. I wonder who the first moroon was to inhale
    air freshner
    
    							mab
9.4488my viewHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jul 16 1996 16:1915
And don't fergit PAM, MairB.

Put me down as one favoring legalization. I think they oughta make
alcohol, reefer and tobacco all the same.

You oughta haveto sign heroin, cocaine and the like but otherwise they
should be legal.

All this stuff about more deaths, more accidents, etc. may be true but
right now, they're dropping like flies anyway and us innocents have lost
several significant consitututional rights becuase of it.

End of Soapbox.

TTom
9.4489PECAD8::CHILDSTue Jul 16 1996 16:2414
 I think you over estimate the increase there MAir. First off anybody who
 abuse drugs more than likely also abuse alcohol unless they have some medical
 condition that won't allow them to drink so no increase there. Second most
 stone cold junkies uses their car only to go cop then head home, fix themselves
 up and then nod off in their homes if they have one. Third anyone who is a
 social drug user is probably smart enough to use a designate driver much like
 good social drinker do..........

 and even if all that wasn't true wouldn't the decrease in drug-related crime
 deaths somewhat balance the scales?

 mike
 
9.4490I know that I'd be fired and Killed by my wifeBSS::RIGGENTue Jul 16 1996 16:2612
    First BAM Morris gets caught with a personal use of 6 lbs of marijuana. 
    Pittsburgh did right by telling him to find a job elsewhere. Paul
    Tagliblue(sp) then only gives the guy a 4 game sentence, Even Steve
    Howe gotta tougher sentence. 
    
    Now Mike Irvin Cops a plea and is expected to get the same slap on the
    wrist, without a single word from the Cowboys ??
    
    The guy shouldn't be allowed to spend an extra month training he should
    be asked to play NT against the Raiders for training camp. 
    
    Jeff
9.4491OLD1S::CADZILLA2Are you a Turtle?Tue Jul 16 1996 17:0114
    
    
    Jeff,
    
       What can the Cowboys say? The league imposed the weak suspension
    not the Cowboys. I'm suprised he did not get some community service
    time. He'll have to live with all of the bad press and what the fans
    will say and do for who knows how long. We still have the case were
    the man with money gets off with little if any jail time. 
    
      Some say the coke is God's way of telling you that you make too much
    money. If we bar every player that does some blow during the off season
    the NFL would not be worth watching. I do not condone the use, but it's
    going to happen in todays world.
9.44922 sides to this coinPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Jul 16 1996 17:064
9.4493whatever happened to improvement?PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Jul 16 1996 17:094
9.4494MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Tue Jul 16 1996 17:187
    
   >> Maybe they should make alcohol illegal too.  

      They did. They called it Prohibition and it was the
      single largest factor in the rise of organized crime
      in this country.
    
9.4495CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jul 16 1996 17:3719
I don't often jump into these debates, but the way I see it, bottom line,
people are responsible for their actions.

We don't all agree with the laws that are legislated in this land.  Some folks
don't agree with the illegality of drugs, some folks don't agree with the
current crop of firearm laws, other folks are peeved at the income tax laws
etc.

However you look at it, it's the hand we're dealt, and our actions are supposed
to conform to the laws.  If they don't, you get into trouble, and some sort of
penalty is obstensibly imposed.

Unfortunately today, there is rather large tendency to blame one's personal
screwups on someone else.  If you spill hot coffee on your lap because you were
too dumb to secure it before driving off, blame McDonald's.  If you get into
trouble, blame it on the system that created you.  

I don't know where it will all end, but I guarantee you, it sure is interesting
to watch.....
9.4496PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Jul 16 1996 19:583
9.4497A Different TuneYIELD::BARBIERITue Jul 16 1996 20:4511
      re: -2
    
      I don't think Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Paul Revere,
      Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, and others beat to that drum!
    
      We should be sovereign citizens of the united states of America
      not Citizens (subjects) of the Unites States (Federal govt.)
    
      Yah...it is interesting all right!!!!
    
    						Tony
9.4498PECAD8::CHILDSWed Jul 17 1996 11:255
All those who expect to see Michael Irvin on the side of the road picking
trash please raise your hand. Nice tough talk there Judge but if you were
really serious you could have enforced your own punishment..........

mike
9.4499TPSYS::BROOKSWed Jul 17 1996 12:057
    The paper says he got 800hrs of cummunity service, plus a 10K fine.
    I bet if you compared this charge to all the other 1st time offenders
    he got as much or more community service hrs and a bigger fine...
    
    Don't judge him on how much $ he has but by the law...
    
    								MaB
9.4500CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Jul 17 1996 12:4221
>      We should be sovereign citizens of the united states of America
>      not Citizens (subjects) of the Unites States (Federal govt.)
    

That's nice in theory.

I just read a recent article on this in the op-ed page of my local paper.
The upshot, with which I happen to agree, is that in order to form a nation, we
give up some measure of our theortically unlimited personal freedoms to enjoy
that nationhood.

Otherwise, we would be, in essence, a bunch of armed tribes constantly
defending ourselves.

I'm personally not in favor of a huge amount of federal government (guess that
puts me more in line with some of the founding fathers) but I don't mind giving
up a few rights "in order to form a more perfect union."

'Saw


9.4501PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Jul 17 1996 17:5912
9.4502CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Jul 17 1996 18:163
Good points, Mike.

The times they are a-changin'.....8^)
9.4503a themeHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Jul 17 1996 18:243
>The times they are a-changin'.....8^)

And it'll prolly continue long past we're all gone.
9.4504MFGFIN::JACKSONSet the drag just right!Wed Jul 17 1996 20:378
      Irvin got 800 hrs?  Thats more than I thought he would, but I'm with
    ya Mike, he won't be poking trash, or picking it up alongside the road
    either;-)
    
      He praised his wife for being there for him.  She could have dumped
    him and took him for lots o'$$$'s, but didn't, yet...
    
      Tim
9.4505WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jul 17 1996 20:4410
    
    
    
        I heard the first part of his 800 hours was to indeed pick up trash
    on the highway. The court decides your service not your agent. I also
    heard alot of the time will be spent with the DARE program and other
    kid related activities.
    
    
    Chap
9.4506OLD1S::CADZILLA2Are you a Turtle?Wed Jul 17 1996 20:536
    
    With any luck he'll do something worthwhile for the community. Many
    times someone will get into this type of mess and come out a better
    person. If that happens maybe he can relay his mistake to those in need
    and make a positive experience for everyone. I do not know if Irvin's
    the type. To much of a showboat, that needs better direction.
9.4507PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Jul 17 1996 21:283
9.4508waiting for an answerFABSIX::D_HORTERTThu Jul 18 1996 01:144
    Hey Tommy, are you ignoring my "p-name challenge" in note .4466 or
    didn't you see it yet??
    
                                                           D.J.
9.4509MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Jul 19 1996 13:224
    
    
       I ain't ignoring your challenge. In the interests of fairness
      I'll even give you 2:1 odds on the AFC title game and the SB.
9.4510OLD1S::CADZILLA2Are you a Turtle?Fri Jul 26 1996 16:5631
    
    
    Five players/coaches will be inducted to the NFL HoF tommorow.
    
    Lou Creekmur 
    1950-59 Detroit Lions. A second round draft choice from William and Mary. 
    Played Guard on offense and on short yardage defense. All NFL Guard in
    51 & 52 Tackle in 53, 54, 56, 57  
    
    Charlie Joiner
    
    Houston 69-72, Cincinnatti 72-75, San Diego 76-86 18 seasons. A fourth
    round pick in 69 by the Oilers. Had 750 catches for 12,146 yards and 65
    TD's. He played more seasons at receiver than anyone in NFL history.
    
    Mel Renfro
    
    Cornerback and Safety a second round pick of the Cowboys in 64. Played
    14 years with the Cowboys. All-NFL 65,69 All-Pro 71,72 All-NFC 70,71,73
    52 interception for 626 yards and 3 td's 
    
    Dan Dierdorf
    
    Tackle second round pick for the Cardinals in 71. Played 13 season
    All-Pro 75->78, 80  Our favorite MNF announcer!!
    
    Joe Gibbs
    
    Coach Washington Redskins 12 seasons 81-92 NFL Coy 82,83,91 
    124-60 regular season 16-50-0 postseason 3 WB wins(Miami,Denver,Buffalo) 
    1 defeat( Raiders last NFC loss in SB)
9.4511The Depressing State of the Packers Offensive LineYIELD::BARBIERITue Aug 13 1996 17:1332
      Any Green Bay Packer fans out there who can give me a player by
      player assessment of their offensive line?
    
      Worst case scenario is that the team is dead before the season
      even started.
    
      Starters:
      LT - Ruettgers - knee sore, not responding, may never play again.
      LG - Aaron Taylor.  Blew out his knee in playoffs against Falcons.
           Similar injury two years ago took a full year.
      RG - Harry Galbreath.  Jumped to another team.
    
      Others -
      Some guard moved to starting left tackle I heard suspected of drug
      abuse and may be out for the year.
    
      Rookie center (2nd string) broke ankle against Steelers.  Out for 
      the year.
    
      I thought I heard the Pack already had four injured offensive 
      tackles.
    
      This is very unsettling.  I honestly thought the Pack had a shot
      at the whole thing this year.  Now, it appears their offensive
      line will be total patchwork and I don't think any such offensive
      line can win a SB.
    
      Anyway, if anyone has any news on the Packers offensive line, I'd
      really appreciate it.
    
    							Tony
             
9.4513Who's He???YIELD::BARBIERITue Aug 13 1996 19:466
      Mike,
    
        Who is Eric Hill?  The names sounds familar, but I don't know
        him.  What position?
    
    							Tony
9.4514In related news, a good day for my hometown Ford City PAEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryMon Aug 19 1996 17:5715
    
    Gus Frerotte wins Redskins starting QB job from Shuler
    
    Monday, August 19 1:05pm ET
    
    In Gus they trust. 
    
    Gus Frerotte, who gets paid far less and was selected six rounds behind
    Heath Shuler in the 1994 draft, today was named the starting
    quarterback for the Washington Redskins. 
    
    The anticipated announcement was made by Washington head coach Norv
    Turner at a morning news conference at Redskin Park. The Redskins host
    the Philadelphia Eagles in their season opener on September 1st. 
    
9.4515Did Miami trade KirbySTRATA::GARRYDallas Cowboys Champs AgainMon Aug 19 1996 19:235
    Can anyone confirm for me that Miami traded Terry Kirby this weekend
    to SF ????
    
    Thanks,
    Tom
9.4516what they saidHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Aug 21 1996 16:538
Tom,

According to the transctions of USA Today:

   Miami Dolphins -- Traded running back Terry Kirby to the San Francisco
   49ers for a conditional 1997 draft pick.

TTom
9.4517NFL roster cutsHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Aug 21 1996 16:53185
NFL roster cuts

     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
  AFC
  
   Baltimore: RB Ricky Powers; DT Chad Eaton.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Buffalo: QB Mike Maxwell; WRs Demeris Johnson and Damon Thomas; S Greg
   Evans; TE Mike Titley; LBs Marc Lillibridge and Robert Deshote; DE
   Harry Van Hofwegen; NT Tim Colston; G Matt Meservey; OL Dave Hack and
   Mike Sheldon; LB Dan Brandenburg.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Cincinnati: DTs Keith Rucker and Todd Kelly; WRs Thomas Bailey and
   Tyree Davis; LB Shawn Banks; TE Demetrius Davis; QB Damon Huard.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Denver: OT Leslie Ratliffe; QB T.J. Rubley; WRs Sanjay Beach and Larry
   Wallace; FB Derrick Clark; CBs Toi Cook and Jamal Ellis; DE Larry
   Jackson and Ricky Sutton; G Alai Kalaniuvalu; RB Mike Pringle; DL
   Lance Teichelman; WR David Gamble; P Brian Gragert; C Keith Kartz; LBs
   Arnold Ale and Ken Brown; DL Ken Talanoa; placed running back L.T.
   Levine on the physically unable to perform list.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Jacksonville: WR Chris Doering and Tony Kimbrough; LB Mark Williams;
   DT Ray Hall; QB Steve Taneyhill; RB Chris Parker; TE Craig Thompson;
   OTs Jason Dukes and Patrick Walsh; DE Cornell Thomas; LBs Ed Brady,
   Cedric Thornton and Mark Williams; and CBs Tommy Johnson and Kelly
   Wiltshire. Also, placed LB Santo Stephens on injured reserve.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Kansas City: QB Bucky Richardson; K Roman Anderson; C Ben Lynch; DEs
   Jason Simmons and Troy Wilson; DT Robert Davis; FB Derrick Ned; LBs
   Alan Young, Nate Dingle and Don Davis; RBs Terry Richardson and Siran
   Stacy; S John Anderson, Brandon Sanders and Charles Swann; TE Willy
   Tate; WR Breyon Bradford, Michael Dritlein, Dietrich Jells and Sean
   LaChapelle.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Miami: CBs Kirk Pointer and Dorian Brew; QB Dan McGwire; OGs Kevin
   Brothen (knee) and Bert Weidner (ankle); OT Ethan Albright; WRs Kirby
   Dar Dar, A.C. Tellison and Sir Mawn Wilson; S Walter Smith; DT Lamar
   Mills; LB LaCurtis Jones; FB Lee McClinton; TE Dewayne Dotson; DT Ed
   Hawthorne; placed defensive end Jeff Cross on the physically unable to
   perform list; placed guards Kevin Brothen and Bert Weidner on injured
   reserve.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   New England: K Matt Bahr; OL John Elmore; TE Chris Griffin; DE Bryon
   Thompson; WR Kevin Lee; DE Rich McKenzie; placed linebacker Bobby
   Abrahms on injured reserve.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   New York: KP Pat O'Neill; WRs Alan Allen, Elbert Ellis, Wayne Morris
   and Darrick Owens; SS Brian Clarke and Chris Hayes; CB Melvin
   Crawford; RBs Lou D'Agostino and Terrell Willis; LB Johnny Frost; OT
   Melvin Hayes; DE Hugh Hunter; DT Eric Johnson; QB John Paci and Gs Tim
   Simpson and Vernice Smith. Also, DE Brent Williams was removed from
   the physically unable to perform list.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Oakland: WRs Philip Bobo and Kenyan Branscomb; QB Todd Studer; S Lamar
   Lyons; CB John Morton; LB Scott Radecic; DE Malcolm Showell. Also,
   placed on injured reserve G Rich Stephens (broken leg); LB Keith
   Franklin (back); WR A.C. Caswell (foot/ankle); RB Kendall Bussey
   (knee).
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Pittsburgh: QB Spence Fischer; RBs LaMonte Coleman, Jermaine Johnson
   and Jon Vaughn; WRs Chris George, Chris Jones, Jay Kearney and Damon
   Mays; TEs Tracy Greene and A.J. Ofodile; OL Greg Black and Emerson
   Martin; DL Lorenzo Green and Taase Faumui; DBs Barron Miles and
   Cornell Parker; P Shayne Edge; P Rohn Stark and PK Joe Wood. Also,
   signed OL Jim Sweeney; placed OL Lewis Tyre and DB Alvoid Mays on
   reserved/left camp list; placed LB Patrick Scott on reserve/injured
   list.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   San Diego: T Jason Bartlett; G Ben Cavil; LB James Gillyard; QB Robert
   Higgins; DT Steve Hoffmann; WR Dwight McKinzie; WR Ray Peterson; SS
   Shawn Gayle.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Seattle: QB Jon Kitna; WR Grayson Shillingford, Manley Woods and WR
   Larry Thompson; OT Mike Keim; SS Tony Covington; LB Willie Brown and
   Henry Newby; DE Johnie Church; CB Sean Crocker; RB Jimmy Gary; DT
   Kelvin Ingram; SS C.J. Richardson. Also, WR Eddie Goines was placed on
   injured reserve and is out for season.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
  NFC
  
   Arizona: RB Garrison Hearst; WR Fred Brock; QB Mark Butterfield; OL
   Joe Carolo; DTs Clyde Simmons, Tommy Jeter and Alton Jones; CB Cedric
   Davis; S Tony Jones; WR Kevin Knox; K Atle Larsen; G Ryan Leahy; RB
   Clarence Matthews; OT Brandon Moore; P Scott Player; LB Nick Smith and
   FB Willie Wright. DE Blaine Berger on injured reserve.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Atlanta: RB Lincoln Coleman; S George Teague; WRs Demetrius Allen,
   Tryone Johnson and Derrell Mitchell, QBs Jim Ballard and Dan White; DE
   Gary Bandy; G James Christiansen; T Robert Couch; DE Tommy Fagan; DTs
   Jim Hanna and Mike Schlegel; P Greg Ivy; CBs Eric Jack and Akili
   Johnson.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Carolina: WRs Ray Crittenden and Marcus Wall; LBs Jamal Fountaine,
   John Walters and Phil Yeboah-Kodie; C Paul Greeley; G Sean Love; Ts
   William Knight and Andrew Peterson; DBs Michael Senters and Butler
   By'Not'e; S Johnnie Williams; FB Scott Greene; DT Jeff Zgonina; DE
   Jeremy Nunley; TE Paul Burke; P Aaron Kanner; K David Lauder. Also,
   placed RB Tony Smith on injured reserve and QB Jim Kubiak on military
   reserve.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Chicago: CBs Jeremy Lincoln and Kenny Gales;; LBs Myron Baker and
   Ahmani Johnson; P Kent Sullivan; TE Andre President; RB Brandon
   Bennett; WRs Fabien Bownes, Don Blair and Shaston Coleman; FB Ed
   Hobbs; S Jeff Horton and Clarence Sutton; G Seth Littleton and OT
   Derrick Turner. Also, placed CB Dwayne Joseph on injured reserve and
   out for season.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Dallas: TE Rickey Brady, DBs Barry Dillard, Charles Franks and Buster
   Owens; FB Ryan Wood, LBs Errick Herrin and Kerry Mock; C Kevin Dogins;
   and DL Mike Harrison, Gabriel Oladipo and Haywood Simmons.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Green Bay: OT Joe Staysniak; DB Reggie Holt; placed offensive tackle
   Ken Ruettgers on the reserve/physically unable to perform list; placed
   running back James Bostic on injured reserve.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Minnesota: K Lin Elliott; LB Tuineau Alipate; RB Bobby Phillips; S
   Shelly Hammonds; LB Earl Mackey; WR Moses Ware; DT Jose White; WR Tony
   Bland and Cedric Tillman; G Orlando Bobo; OT Matt Reem and CBs Michael
   Robinson and Jamie Coleman.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   New York: QB Tommy Maddox; WRs Gary Harrell and Kevin Alexander; DTs
   Stacey Dillard and Todd Yeaman; P Daron Alcorn; OT Ken Dammann; G
   Chris Kennedy; C Jason Stinson; LB Jeff Rodgers; S Mark Washington; FB
   Geof Grenier; CB Tim Sensley; placed defensive lineman Ramon Okili on
   injured reserve with a wrist injury.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Philadelphia: TE Tony Johnson; DE Sebastian Barrie; FB Chris
   Buckhalter; LBs Joe Cummings and Steve White; CBs Frederick Ford,
   Jerome Henderson and Tristan Moss; Ts Steve Wallace and Chris
   Oltmanns; WRs Khevin Pratt, Phillip Riley and Cedric Zachery; OL Joe
   Rudolph.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   St. Louis: OL Lance Zeno, John Earle and Keith Loneker; DBs Demetrice
   Martin and John Reece; LBs Ashley Sheppard and Ed Stewart; RB Marcus
   Holliday; DL Andre Davis and Antonio Armstrong.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   San Francisco: QB Gino Torretta; RB Johnny Johnson; DEs Oliver
   Barnett, Herb Coleman and James Guarnera; CBs Eric Carter and Anthony
   Prior; LB Tom Cavallo; WRs Chris Thomas and Mark Harris; S Mike Salmon
   and Pat McGuirk; RBs Brian O'Neal, Stephen Pitts and Reynard
   Rutherford; DT Albert Reese; T Andrew Moore; TE Luther Morris; placed
   tight end Adrian Cooper and fullback William Floyd on the
   reserve/physically unable to perform list;
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Tampa Bay: LB Keith Goganious; P Robbie Colley; WRs Terrence Davis and
   Jermaine Holmes; DE Emil Ekiyor; RB Leonard Green; CBs George Harris
   and Reggie Rusk; QB Kelly Holcomb; TE Brian Jones; OTs Darryl Moore
   and Peter Pierson, FB Robert Staten and DT Ben Williams. Also, placed
   S John Booty, WR Horace Copeland and DE Keith Powe on injured reserve.
   They will miss the entire 1996 season; CB Jerry Wilson.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Washington: Veteran C John Gesek and Christopher Sedoris; RB Reggie
   Brooks; RB Larry Jones; WR Tydus Winans; DT Leonard Renfro; LB Jeremy
   Asher; WR Alfonzo Browning; DT Ervin Collier; CB Ramon George; QB Mark
   Hartsell; CB Allen Johnson; LB Jim Kitts; T Marc Lamb; DE Don
   Reynolds; TE Ca'Dell Seagraves; WR Charlie Simmons; T Matt Storm; T
   Keith Wagner; WR Michael Watkins.
9.4518STRATA::GARRYDallas Cowboys Champs AgainWed Aug 21 1996 19:011
    thanks........
9.4519Looking for SI Pro Football Edition to BorrowYIELD::BARBIERIWed Aug 28 1996 12:227
      Does anyone have the SI pro football edition?  I hear they had
      an article on the Packers that I'd love to have a chance to
      read.  Anyone in the Hudson facility have it that can lend it?
    
      Kevin, MikeC, Jimbo???
    
    						Tony
9.4520MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Wed Aug 28 1996 14:205
I haven't gotten it in the mail yet, but there is 
an "Why Everyone Should Root for the Packers" article
on the web - http://pathfinder.com - follow the SI links.

Mike
9.4521up and comingHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Aug 28 1996 14:2314
It seems like a lot of people are jumping on the Packer bandwagon.

This isn't directed to the fans in SPROTS as much as toward the sprots
talk shows and the like.

Green Bay seems to have become somewhat of the media darling. Maybe it
has something to do with a lot of people wanting someone aside from San
Fran or Dallas to win it.

In any case, you hear a lot of predictions of them in the SuperBowl
beating a variety of hopefuls from the AFC like Miami, New England,
and Kansas City.

TTom
9.4522MKOTS3::BREENWed Aug 28 1996 15:194
    Ttom, you should see the excitement around here because of the
    exhibition season and several rookies looking good.  Some Goldberg guy,
    though has the Pats at the bottom of this nfl predictions, one up from
    the Jets.
9.4523homer?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Aug 28 1996 15:528
re: Goldberg

Aint that the guy on ESPN who's almost a homer for the Fins?

All I can say is good luck to all, including myself, cause I'm gonna need
it the firsted couple of weeks.

TTom
9.4524Have ItYIELD::BARBIERIWed Aug 28 1996 19:387
      re: .4520
    
      Mike,
    
        Got it!  Thanks!  (great article)
    
    						Tony
9.4525Time for a real mans sport!!!MFGFIN::JACKSONOnlysayingwhatsonmymindFri Aug 30 1996 04:5535
      Well I guess it prediction time for the playoff race and SB, even
    though I won't be here went its all over;-(
    
      AFC:				NFC:
    
    east:  	Bills			east:  	    cowgirls
           	Colts (wildcard)	       	    Eagles (wildcard)
    
    
    central:   sqeelers			central:    Packers
    						    Lions  (wildcard)
    
    
    west:      Chiefs	 		west:	    49'rs
    	       Broncos  (wildcard)		    Falcons (wildcard)
    	       Chargers (wildcard)
    
    
    	AFC chump:	Bills (ouch)		NFC chump:   Packers
    
    				
    				SB champ:  Packers
    
    
      The AFC will play well again in the SB, but will still come up
    just short.  Next year the AFC will triumph in the SB, and it will be
    my mighty Broncos!   (stop laughing)  They are 1 excellent CB and DL
    away if they keep the nuclius that they have now.
    
      The recent dominant teams won't have the depth that they used to do
    to FA.  Thats evident this year, and will be more so next year.
    
      LET THE GAMES BEGIN!
    
      Tim
9.4526PECAD8::CHILDSFri Aug 30 1996 11:0615
AFC                                 NFC



Colts                              Cowboys
Steelers                           Packers
Seattle                            Niners    

Patsies                            Lions
Cinncy                             Falcons
KC                                 Bears


	Steelers slap Niners in bowl
9.4527SUBPAC::SKALSKIA reclined state of mindFri Aug 30 1996 13:008
    
    
    
    
    			To whom do we send the KOH picks for thised week?
    
    
    							Shark
9.4528SHARE::DERRYColor me impressed...Fri Aug 30 1996 13:211
9.4529take no chancesHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Aug 30 1996 13:3318
hey I aint never seen a prediction I aint liked:

AFC-East	Bills
AFC-Central	Steelhaids
AFC-West	Kansas City
AFC-WCs		New England, Miami, Seattle

NFC-East	Cowboys
NFC-Central	Packers
NFC-West	Niners
NFC-WCs		Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta

AFC-Champs	Chiefs
NFC-Champs	Boys

SB-Champs	Boys (again)

TTom
9.4530Don't have really strong feelings about any of these picksTNPUBS::NAZZAROZydeco!Fri Aug 30 1996 15:2622
    As always, off the top of my haid:
    
    AFC East - New England/Buffalo
    AFC Central - Houston
    AFC West - San Diego
    
    Wildcards - NE/Buf; Indy; Pittsburgh
    
    
    NFC East - Dallas
    NFC Central - Tampa Bay
    NFC West - San Francisco
    
    Wildcards - Atlanta, Green Bay, Minnesota
    
    
    AFC Champ - Buffalo
    NFC Champ - San Francisco
    
    SB Champs - San Francisco
    
    NAZZ
9.4531As I said, who has a real clueMKOTS3::BREENFri Aug 30 1996 15:308
    Pats			Dallas
    Houston			G.Bay
    KC				SF
    
    Seattle			Detroit
    Miami			Atlanta
    Jets			Carolina
    
9.4532Pack is BackPHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Fri Aug 30 1996 15:5114
AFC-East	Bills
AFC-Central	Steelers
AFC-West	Oakland
AFC-WCs		New England, Miami 

NFC-East	Philadelphia
NFC-Central	Packers
NFC-West	Niners
NFC-WCs		Dallas, Detroit

AFC-Champs	Steelers
NFC-Champs	Packers

SB-Champs	Packers
9.4533I'll get in this one!SMARTT::SALMONFri Aug 30 1996 16:2316
    AFC East        Indy
        Central     Steelers
        West        Denver
        WCs         New England, Chieffs
    
    NFC East        Dallas
        Central     Packers
        West        49'ers
        WCs         Detroit, Bears
    
     AFC Champs     Denver
     NFC Champs     49'ers
    
     SB-Champs      49'ers
    
                                  
9.4534Replay of Superbowl 1 would be coolMUTEX::LIUFri Aug 30 1996 19:0321
NFC East:      Dallas
NFC Central:   Green Bay
NFC West:      San Francisco
NFC Wildcards: Chicago, Philadelphia, Carolina

NFC Champ:     Green Bay

AFC East:      Buffalo
AFC Central:   Pittsburgh
AFC West:      Kansas City
AFC Wildcards: New England, Denver, Cincinnati

AFC Champ:     Kansas City

Super Bowl Champ:     Green Bay

S.F. goes down on injuries
G.B., K.C. home field advantage
Dallas can't hack Lambeau field in January
Parcells goes to TV booth after season
9.4535PITTSBURGH 31 GREEN BAY 17FABSIX::D_HORTERTSat Aug 31 1996 01:4732
    
    AFC CENTRAL:  PITTSBURGH
                   
       AFC EAST:  NEW ENGLAND
    
       AFC WEST:  SEATTLE
    
    AFC WILDCARDS:  CINCINATTI, MIAMI, & KANSAS CITY
    
    *AFC CHAMPION*:  PITTSBURGH
    
    
    NFC CENTRAL:  GREEN BAY
    
       NFC EAST:  DALLAS
    
       NFC WEST:  SAN FRANCISCO
    
    NFC WILDCARDS:  DETROIT, PHILADELPHIA, ATLANTA
    
    *NFC CHAMPION*:  GREEN BAY
    
    
              ***SUPER BOWL CHAMPION***
              *  -------------------  *
              *                       *
              *  PITTSBURGH STEELERS  *
              *                       *
              *************************
    
    
                                                          D.J.
9.4536Pack the Pick and Pick the PackYIELD::BARBIERISun Sep 01 1996 14:1543
				NFC

	East: 		Cowboys
	Central:  	Packers
	West:		49'ers

	Lions
	Redskins
	Falcons

	Redskins over Falcons
	Cowboys over Lions

	49'ers over Cowboys	(9'ers are now spent)
	Packers over Redskins

	Packers over 49'ers IN LAMBEAU FIELD


				AFC

	East:		Bills
	Central:	Steelers
	West:		Chiefs

	Patriots
	Bengals
	Broncos

	Patriots over Bengals
	Steelers over Broncos

	Chiefs over Steelers
	Patriots over Bills

	Chiefs over Patriots

				SUPER BOWL

	PACKERS OVER CHIEFS      (IN LAMBEAU FIELD!!!!!)


	All right, in New Orleans or wherever.
9.4537HmmmmmYIELD::BARBIERITue Sep 03 1996 12:541
      Redskins were a weird hunch!
9.4538PECAD8::CHILDSDan Reeves - one bad studTue Sep 03 1996 13:396
I noticed that more than one team has taken to the Jerry Jones style of
outfitting their teams. Raiders got the swoosh the Giants got whatever
that Rebook thing is supposed to be. Raiders I can understand cause Al's
always been a renegade but the Jints? Must be the Tesch influence......

mc
9.4539CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Sep 03 1996 13:5210
>
>I noticed that more than one team has taken to the Jerry Jones style of
>outfitting their teams. Raiders got the swoosh the Giants got whatever
>that Rebook thing is supposed to be. Raiders I can understand cause Al's
>always been a renegade but the Jints? Must be the Tesch influence......

Isn't that the manufacturer of the uniforms?  Or does Apex still make the
Giants unis?

Or am I totally misunderstanding what you're talking about?
9.4540TAYTER::BROOKSThu Sep 05 1996 11:344
    Anyone have a copy of this weeks injury report ? Or can someone point
    me in the direction of where I can pull one from on the WEB ? Thanks
    in advance...
    
9.4541not yetHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Sep 05 1996 13:429
MaB,

The IR doesn't come out til late tonight. It'll be on the USA Today web
or paper or the Sportcenter web tomorrow morning.

When there's a Thursday night game, those teams release there IR
Wedndesday night.

TTom
9.4542MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Thu Sep 05 1996 14:037
Check out the NFL site - www.nfl.com.

Looks like they have a report for week 2.

http://www.nfl.com/news/injury/index.html

Mike
9.4543Only an Italian can tell this jokeTNPUBS::NAZZAROZydeco!Thu Sep 05 1996 14:119
    My brother told me this joke he heard on WEEI:
    
    How do you pronounce Bledsoe in Italian??????
    
    
    
    	Testaverde!
    
    NAZZ
9.4544good pointerHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Sep 05 1996 14:128
Thanks for the pointer, Mike.

FWIW, this is the Wednesday report. IRs are updated Wednesday and Friday
according to this page. Some of these have already changed. For instance,
Emmitt Smith is listed at Doubtful while the team has upgraded him to
Questionable.

TTom
9.4545NFL power ratingsHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Sep 06 1996 18:5152
   
The mighty fall hard: Cowboys drop to No. 13

   By Herman Matthews
   Scripps Howard News Service
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   The Dallas Cowboys toppled from No. 1 to No. 13 in the Scripps Howard
   pro football computer power ratings on the heels of their 22-6 pasting
   Monday night in Chicago.
   
   The Green Bay Packers, who used four touchdown passes from '95 NFL MVP
   Brett Favre to rout the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 34-3 in their season
   open, have taken over the top spot.
   
   Here are the power rankings after Week 1. To determine the projected
   margin for Week 2 games, compare the ratings of the rival teams and
   allow four points for typical home-field advantage.
   
  Green Bay             60.6
  San Francisco         58.3
  Chicago               58.2
  San Diego             55.8
  Kansas City           54.9
  Carolina              54.2
  Denver                53.5
  Philadelphia          53.0
  Jacksonville          53.0
  Miami                 52.5
  Minnesota             51.8
  Houston               51.4
  Dallas                51.4
  Buffalo               51.3
  Indianapolis          50.9
  St. Louis             50.6
  Detroit               49.7
  Pittsburgh            49.0
  Baltimore             48.3
  Washington            48.2
  Oakland               47.3
  Seattle               45.8
  Cincinnati            45.6
  Arizona               45.3
  New Orleans           45.1
  N.Y. Giants           44.6
  Atlanta               44.5
  Tampa Bay             43.3
  New England           42.6
  N.Y. Jets             38.7

   Herman Matthews is chairman of the math and natural sciences
   department at Lincoln Memorial University in Harrogate, Tenn.
9.4546;^)MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsFri Sep 06 1996 20:118
>  N.Y. Jets             38.7

	Wow, that's pretty hard to believe for a team who has as
	qb a stud who single-handedly took the Steelers to SBXXX.
	(only to be forced by the head coach to through ints.)


	billl
9.4547Complete text of Grogan at the Helm avail. c authorMKOTS3::BREENFri Sep 06 1996 20:3926
    Never has one game played in the nfl been considered so definitive to a
    season as this year.  O'Donnell needs to be rated after 5-7 games not
    after 1.  
    
    Now many would still rate Cowher ahead of Raymond Berry but on December
    23rd, 1986 when the Patriots fell behind at the Orange Bowl,with not
    only the conference but their wildcard hopes pinned on the final game,
    
	In a bar in Cinninatti a smile graced Boomer's lip.
	"Playoffs here we come, K.C." he had the brass to quip.
    
    Berry didn't panic like Cowher.  He ran the ball despite his misgivings
    of the line.
    
	All depended upon the line, that much detested crew:
	Holloway, Wooten, Fairchild, Brock and Haley too.

    Berry allowed Grogan to bide his time unlike Cowher's force feeding pass,
    pass, pass to O'Donnell.
    
	And when the Dolphin Defense drew in to shut the door,
	Steve caught Thompson napping and Stanley had the score.

    Berry's problem was that even having the steely, ageless veteran Grogan
    he put Eason back in for the playoff game just like Cowher pushing
    O'Donnell into free agency to cover his ineptitude in the SuperBowl.
9.4548TAYTER::BROOKSMon Sep 09 1996 15:274
    Im not sure how that rating is created and why but in terms of betting
    the bottom 10 teams on that list all lost (Not sure if the all covered
    there spreads but they lost there games).
    
9.4549Go Pack!YIELD::BARBIERITue Sep 10 1996 16:414
      Packers looked awfully solid last night.
      They have a chance for all the marbles!
    
    					Tony
9.4550TAYTER::BROOKSTue Sep 10 1996 16:587
    Seen the Best NFL commercial in a long time...
    
    Basically has 2 Clevelander's sitting in Cleveland Stadium bragging
    about the 2 great 50yrd line tickets they got for the Browns Game :-)
    
    Commercials ends with one saying to the other... Must be a 4 oclock 
    game ..
9.4551CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Sep 10 1996 17:078
Went to bed when it was 37-7 last night.  Final score was 39-13.

Obviously the Pack registered a safety, but how'd Philly get their 6?

TD no conversion, or two FGs?


'Saw
9.4552safetyHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Sep 10 1996 17:087
Sack by Santana Dotson for the safety and 2 points. Saw that on
Sportcenter.

Have no clue about the other scoring. I was unconscious long afore this
one ended.

TTom
9.4553MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticTue Sep 10 1996 18:5910
    
      Early on it looked like it might be game when Philly
     held Green Bay to a fg after a tough turnover. But things
     started to snow ball on Philly and before you know it
     they were down 20-0 and I was shutting off the tv and 
     cracking open a book. Yeah, Green Bay looked good but
     not invincible. Favre was off early and as was mentioned 
     Philly shut 'em down early. Cut out the turnovers and it
     might have been a game though Peete looked fairly ineffect-
     ual. Looks like a wide open field for the title this year.
9.4554CommentsYIELD::BARBIERITue Sep 10 1996 19:2312
      Philly scored a TD with ~10 seconds left.  They went for 2.
    
      The Pack ran the ball extremely well in the 2nd half.  Several
      runs of 5 yards or more.  Bennett and Henderson looked good
      rushing.
    
      Announcers were saying it easily could have been low 50's
      had it not been for a couple drops and a botched snap from
      the 3 yard line for a FG.  (GB was just running the ball, not
      trying to strike the endzone.)
    
    						Tony
9.4555sagarin ratingsHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Sep 11 1996 16:12107
Jeff Sagarin's power ratings
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Through games of Monday, Sept. 9
HOME ADVANTAGE=  2.15               RATING    W   L   T  SCHEDULE 
   1  San Francisco 49ers         =  30.77    2   0   0   14.52
   2  Dallas Cowboys              =  29.71    1   1   0   20.22
   3  Green Bay Packers           =  28.38    2   0   0   17.49
   4  Kansas City Chiefs          =  25.46    2   0   0   19.38
   5  Miami Dolphins              =  23.92    2   0   0   15.06
   6  San Diego Chargers          =  23.26    2   0   0   12.97
   7  Minnesota Vikings           =  23.21    2   0   0   19.46
   8  Pittsburgh Steelers         =  22.96    1   1   0   16.02
   9  Denver Broncos              =  22.52    2   0   0   13.77
  10  Detroit Lions               =  22.36    1   1   0   18.45
  11  Chicago Bears               =  22.33    1   1   0   23.96
  12  Buffalo Bills               =  22.29    2   0   0   17.01
  13  Philadelphia Eagles         =  21.29    1   1   0   25.44
  14  Indianapolis Colts          =  20.08    2   0   0   12.82
  15  Oakland Raiders             =  19.72    0   2   0   23.99
  16  Houston Oilers              =  19.05    1   1   0   19.63
  17  Carolina Panthers           =  18.96    2   0   0   17.27
  18  Baltimore Ravens            =  18.23    1   1   0   21.34
  19  Washington Redskins         =  18.21    1   1   0   19.66
  20  New York Giants             =  18.11    0   2   0   26.00
  21  New Orleans Saints          =  17.99    0   2   0   24.87
  22  Atlanta Falcons             =  16.55    0   2   0   21.09
  23  Seattle Seahawks            =  16.08    0   2   0   22.89
  24  New England Patriots        =  15.92    0   2   0   25.25
  25  St. Louis Rams              =  15.35    1   1   0   22.46
  26  Arizona Cardinals           =  14.19    0   2   0   22.00
  27  Cincinnati Bengals          =  14.15    0   2   0   21.45
  28  Jacksonville Jaguars        =  13.81    1   1   0   18.86
  29  Tampa Bay Buccaneers        =  13.68    0   2   0   25.37
  30  New York Jets               =  11.45    0   2   0   21.30

  Divisional rankings
  
      DIVISION                      RATING   TEAMS 
   1  (NFC CENTRAL)               =  21.99       5
   2  (AFC WEST)                  =  21.41       5
   3  (NFC EAST)                  =  20.30       5
   4  (NFC WEST)                  =  19.93       5
   5  (AFC EAST)                  =  18.73       5
   6  (AFC CENTRAL)               =  17.64       5

  Rankings by division
  
  NFC East
  
   Rating: 20.30
HOME ADVANTAGE=  2.15               RATING    W   L   T  SCHEDULE 
   2  Dallas Cowboys              =  29.71    1   1   0   20.22
  13  Philadelphia Eagles         =  21.29    1   1   0   25.44
  19  Washington Redskins         =  18.21    1   1   0   19.66
  20  New York Giants             =  18.11    0   2   0   26.00
  26  Arizona Cardinals           =  14.19    0   2   0   22.00

  NFC Central
  
   Rating: 21.99
HOME ADVANTAGE=  2.15               RATING    W   L   T  SCHEDULE 
   3  Green Bay Packers           =  28.38    2   0   0   17.49
   7  Minnesota Vikings           =  23.21    2   0   0   19.46
  10  Detroit Lions               =  22.36    1   1   0   18.45
  11  Chicago Bears               =  22.33    1   1   0   23.96
  29  Tampa Bay Buccaneers        =  13.68    0   2   0   25.37

  NFC West
  
   Rating: 19.93
HOME ADVANTAGE=  2.15               RATING    W   L   T  SCHEDULE 
   1  San Francisco 49ers         =  30.77    2   0   0   14.52
  17  Carolina Panthers           =  18.96    2   0   0   17.27
  21  New Orleans Saints          =  17.99    0   2   0   24.87
  22  Atlanta Falcons             =  16.55    0   2   0   21.09
  25  St. Louis Rams              =  15.35    1   1   0   22.46

  AFC East
  
   Rating: 18.73
HOME ADVANTAGE=  2.15               RATING    W   L   T  SCHEDULE 
   5  Miami Dolphins              =  23.92    2   0   0   15.06
  12  Buffalo Bills               =  22.29    2   0   0   17.01
  14  Indianapolis Colts          =  20.08    2   0   0   12.82
  24  New England Patriots        =  15.92    0   2   0   25.25
  30  New York Jets               =  11.45    0   2   0   21.30

  AFC Central
  
   Rating: 17.64
HOME ADVANTAGE=  2.15               RATING    W   L   T  SCHEDULE 
   8  Pittsburgh Steelers         =  22.96    1   1   0   16.02
  16  Houston Oilers              =  19.05    1   1   0   19.63
  18  Baltimore Ravens            =  18.23    1   1   0   21.34
  27  Cincinnati Bengals          =  14.15    0   2   0   21.45
  28  Jacksonville Jaguars        =  13.81    1   1   0   18.86

  AFC West
  
   Rating: 21.41
HOME ADVANTAGE=  2.15               RATING    W   L   T  SCHEDULE 
   4  Kansas City Chiefs          =  25.46    2   0   0   19.38
   6  San Diego Chargers          =  23.26    2   0   0   12.97
   9  Denver Broncos              =  22.52    2   0   0   13.77
  15  Oakland Raiders             =  19.72    0   2   0   23.99
  23  Seattle Seahawks            =  16.08    0   2   0   22.89
9.4556and if'n you din't like those, ...HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Sep 11 1996 16:4851
   ESPNET SportsZone | NFL
   
The Zone's NFL power rankings

   ESPNET SportsZone power rankings are calculated using several factors,
   including points scored and allowed, yardage gained and allowed,
   turnovers, points scored per 100 yards gained, and winning percentage.
   
   An average team is rated at 100 points. The difference between any two
   power rankings corresponds to the expected point difference if the two
   teams were to play. The power value is based on all games played this
   season.
   
   Data compiled by Matt Lombardi at MicroBrothers Software. Lombardi
   will also be providing power rankings for college football and the
   NBA.
   
   For more information, see the MicroBrothers Software web site at
   www.microbro.com.
Rank Team                   Power
1.   Green Bay Packers      113.25
2.   San Francisco 49ers    112.68
3.   Miami Dolphins         110.90
4.   Denver Broncos         110.05
5.   San Diego Chargers     109.80
6.   Buffalo Bills          107.88
7.   Indianapolis Colts     107.28
8.   Carolina Panthers      106.65
9.   Kansas City Chiefs     106.53
10.  Minnesota Vikings      106.38
11.  Dallas Cowboys         104.80
12.  Houston Oilers         104.15
13.  Chicago Bears          103.93
14.  Jacksonville Jaguars   103.05
15.  Detroit Lions          102.98
16.  Pittsburgh Steelers    102.78
17.  Washington Redskins    101.03
18.  Baltimore Ravens       100.73
19.  Philadelphia Eagles     98.97
20.  St. Louis Rams          98.38
21.  New Orleans Saints      97.05
22.  Oakland Raiders         95.85
23.  New England Patriots    95.83
24.  Atlanta Falcons         95.38
25.  Cincinnati Bengals      95.22
26.  Arizona Cardinals       94.25
27.  Seattle Seahawks        93.68
28.  New York Jets           93.68
29.  New York Giants         93.10
30.  Tampa Bay Buccaneers    92.08

9.4557NQOS01::nqsrv240.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchWed Sep 11 1996 21:155
Damn, I keep hopin to see my two favorites, the Giants and Cards at the bottom 
of one of these lists so I'll get to see a game that means something when they 
meet here in Tempe.

brews
9.4558CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Sep 12 1996 11:572
Cards ain't going to be at the bottom of ANY list now that they have that
SUPERSTAR Kent Graham at the helm.....heheheheheheheheh
9.4559PECAD8::CHILDSThu Sep 12 1996 12:474
 Graham > Brown..........

;^(
9.4560CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Sep 12 1996 12:528
>
>
> Graham > Brown..........
>
>;^(

Oh, no doubt. *BUT* Graham still sucks.  8^)

9.4561TRIBE::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Sep 12 1996 13:199
    
> Graham > Brown..........
    
    Saw this; only thought was "Otto Graham better than Jim Brown? 
    Hmmm..."
    
    I miss football.
    
    Joe
9.4562PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Thu Sep 12 1996 14:396
|Cards ain't going to be at the bottom of ANY list now that they have that
|SUPERSTAR Kent Graham at the helm.....heheheheheheheheh
    
    the sad fact is he has outplayed Boomer thus far.  
    
    Mike (who got to meet Kent's family on Sunday night)
9.4563NQOS01::nqsrv142.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchThu Sep 12 1996 16:333
Yeah, but he's yet to play against any 1st team defense.

boC
9.4564must be trueHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Sep 12 1996 19:0416
Team denies report that Colts are headed to Cleveland

INDIANAPOLIS - A broadcast report that the Indianapolis Colts might be
considering a move to Cleveland was strongly denied Wednesday by Jim
Irsay, the son of owner Robert Irsay and the team's senior executive.
''It's not true. We're 2-0. We're trying to create something special
here in Indianapolis. It's just unnecessary,'' he said of the ESPN
report that said there was a possibility the Colts would move to
Cleveland and allow the Baltimore Ravens to reclaim the nickname
''Colts.'' Irsay said he had no idea where the report originated.
''We're working hard to get season tickets up. We have a great team
here, and I'm very happy to be in Indianapolis,'' he stressed. Season
ticket sales have dropped significantly since 1984, when the franchise
arrived from Baltimore. Indianapolis drew 481,305 fans to its eight
home games that year and have never matched the figure.

9.4565AlignmentMUTEX::LIUFaan-HoanThu Sep 12 1996 20:2112
What would be the effect of moving Indianapolis, not geographically but
divisionally, to the AFC Central (let 'em keep the horseshoe) and switching
Baltimore to the AFC East? Geographic alignment would be better.

And why is it called the NFC West if San Fran is the only team west of the
Mississippi? (vs. Atlanta, New Orleans, Carolina, St. Louis)

-fhl

P.S. I don't like the Raven name or logo, but I can hear sound bites:
Raven Mad, Raven Lunatic, Ravenous, etc.
9.4566Peering into the future ....TNPUBS::NAZZAROTwo months to Maui - Go UMass!Thu Sep 12 1996 20:354
    Great denial by young Irsay.  I can see those moving vans circling the
    Hoosier dome about midnight on March 24, 1997.
    
    NAZZ
9.4567ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Sep 12 1996 20:502
    
    they're not using vans this time, the stuff is going to be airlifted.
9.4568CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Sep 13 1996 12:469
9.4569maybeHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Sep 13 1996 13:4223
9.4570everything else is artificialSUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Sep 13 1996 13:548
9.4571SNAX::ERICKSONFri Sep 13 1996 14:029
9.4572Painters pay wellHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Sep 13 1996 14:037
9.4573Probably not the Bucs in ClevelandTNPUBS::NAZZAROTwo months to Maui - Go UMass!Fri Sep 13 1996 14:254
9.4574SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRCentral Division Champs=IndiansFri Sep 13 1996 14:323
9.4575NFL Conference history from 1960 on....CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Sep 13 1996 14:33187
9.4576switcherooneyHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Sep 13 1996 14:4714
9.4577NQOS01::nqsrv220.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchFri Sep 13 1996 16:1311
9.4578I say he doesn't make it to the end-of-seasonEDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Sep 13 1996 17:0013
9.457916.67.96.117::dfaustDennis FaustFri Sep 13 1996 17:037
9.4580Your team's gone, Hal...EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Sep 13 1996 17:039
9.4581Who'd A Thought?YIELD::BARBIERIMon Sep 23 1996 12:346
9.4582and tip their hand?PECAD8::CHILDSMon Sep 23 1996 12:580
9.4583Jeff georgeODIXIE::ZOGRANPost-Olympics bluesMon Sep 23 1996 20:5918
9.4584MKOTS3::BREENMon Sep 23 1996 21:099
9.4585OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D Tools SupportMon Sep 23 1996 21:532
9.4586SALEM::DODASearching for the next distractionTue Sep 24 1996 13:387
9.4587What of Jones???YIELD::BARBIERITue Sep 24 1996 14:229
9.4588Take June Jones, please!ODIXIE::ZOGRANPost-Olympics bluesTue Sep 24 1996 17:3613
9.4589parity?MUTEX::LIUFaan-HoanTue Sep 24 1996 19:086
9.4590GO PACK!!!YIELD::BARBIERITue Sep 24 1996 21:465
9.4591SeriouslyYIELD::BARBIERITue Sep 24 1996 21:477
9.4592tun-4.imc.das.dec.com::dfaustDennis FaustTue Sep 24 1996 22:4517
9.4593like I haven't had enough alreadySMART2::CHILDSWed Sep 25 1996 11:309
9.4594CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Sep 25 1996 13:2418
9.4595EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Sep 26 1996 12:3620
9.4596CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Sep 26 1996 14:4513
9.4597MKOTS3::BREENThu Sep 26 1996 16:0514
9.4598and on it goes...MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsThu Sep 26 1996 20:0813
9.4599I think I know the answerBSS::MENDEZFri Sep 27 1996 14:283
9.4600CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Sep 27 1996 14:281
9.4601CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Sep 27 1996 14:2812
9.4602Les SteckleSALEM::DODAOut of my mind, back in 5 minutesFri Sep 27 1996 14:390
9.4603MKOTS3::BREENFri Sep 27 1996 16:027
9.4604should read collie boyBSS::MENDEZFri Sep 27 1996 16:072
9.4605CSLALL::BRULESmoke on the WaterFri Sep 27 1996 16:131
9.4606One level up in Dante's Inferno....CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Sep 27 1996 16:2614
9.4607MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsFri Sep 27 1996 18:4015
9.4608EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Sep 27 1996 18:4713
9.4609MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsFri Sep 27 1996 18:461
9.4610EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Sep 27 1996 18:568
9.4611CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Sep 27 1996 19:0710
9.4612PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Fri Sep 27 1996 19:331
9.4613MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsFri Sep 27 1996 19:407
9.4614AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Sep 30 1996 10:433
9.4615GO PACK!!!YIELD::BARBIERIMon Sep 30 1996 12:313
9.4616CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Sep 30 1996 12:4110
9.4617'Course Moon choked, as usual-- we'll give him a bit partEDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Sep 30 1996 12:569
9.4618CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Sep 30 1996 13:3717
9.4619Falcons trade?ODIXIE::ZOGRANBravos all the way!Tue Oct 01 1996 15:588
9.4620SALEM::DODAOut of my mind, back in 5 minutesTue Oct 01 1996 16:086
9.4621Sheesh...ODIXIE::ZOGRANBravos all the way!Tue Oct 01 1996 17:257
9.4622maybe..maybe notBSS::MENDEZTue Oct 01 1996 18:467
9.4623OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D Tools SupportTue Oct 01 1996 18:534
9.4624PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Tue Oct 01 1996 18:576
9.4625SALEM::DODAOut of my mind, back in 5 minutesTue Oct 01 1996 19:112
9.4626MSBCS::BRYDIETastes like chickenTue Oct 01 1996 19:142
9.4627GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Tue Oct 01 1996 19:354
9.4628George says noHBAHBA::HAASNot A Sane Chap Anywhere 'RoundWed Oct 09 1996 15:2714
9.4629Good riddance, take June with you!ODIXIE::ZOGRANBravos all the way!Wed Oct 09 1996 16:4615
9.4630PECAD8::CHILDSWed Oct 09 1996 16:521
9.4631EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 09 1996 17:0212
9.4632NQOS01::nqsrv107.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchWed Oct 09 1996 17:508
9.4633SALEM::DODAFrustrated IncorporatedMon Oct 21 1996 15:055
9.4634ODIXIE::ZOGRANBravos all the way!Mon Oct 21 1996 15:283
9.4635IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Oct 21 1996 15:406
9.4636George WaivedHBAHBA::HAASNot A Sane Chap Anywhere 'RoundWed Oct 23 1996 18:0610
9.4637Sell the team, please!ODIXIE::ZOGRANBravos all the way!Wed Oct 23 1996 18:3916
9.4638moreHBAHBA::HAASNot A Sane Chap Anywhere 'RoundWed Oct 23 1996 18:525
9.4639ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Oct 23 1996 18:552
9.4640I'll bet no team bitesAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherWed Oct 23 1996 20:057
9.4641Possible ExplanationYIELD::BARBIERIWed Oct 23 1996 20:482
9.4642possibleHBAHBA::HAASNot A Sane Chap Anywhere 'RoundWed Oct 23 1996 20:5613
9.4643ODIXIE::ZOGRANBravos all the way!Wed Oct 23 1996 21:166
9.4644AWECIM::RUSSOclaimin!Wed Oct 23 1996 22:0027
9.4645PHXSS1::HEISERmaranatha!Wed Oct 23 1996 22:412
9.4646Raiders sip, Chappy...EDWIN::WAUGAMANBurn Tempe to the GroundTue Nov 05 1996 13:2012
9.4647CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westTue Nov 05 1996 14:4115
9.4648BSS::BRUNOIt's finally over!Tue Nov 05 1996 16:365
9.4649GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Tue Nov 05 1996 18:034
9.4650colorado native = non bronco fanCSC32::J_HILLTue Nov 05 1996 18:034
9.4651BSS::BRUNOIt's finally over!Tue Nov 05 1996 18:426
9.4652nyuk, nyukBRAT::taydhcp-23-144-238.tay.dec.com::LongWtaxation without representationTue Nov 05 1996 19:176
9.4653Can't lose with this strategy!BSS::BRUNOIt's finally over!Tue Nov 05 1996 23:387
9.4654CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Nov 06 1996 12:0413
9.4655BSS::BRUNOIt's finally over!Wed Nov 06 1996 12:142
9.4656MSBCS::BRYDIETastes like chicken.Wed Nov 06 1996 12:285
9.4657BSS::BRUNOIt's finally over!Wed Nov 06 1996 14:334
9.4658WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSTue Nov 12 1996 12:057
9.4659SALEM::DODAVisibly shaken, not stirredTue Nov 12 1996 12:201
9.4660ILBBAK::SILVESTRIPenuts Gang turns 10 in 1997!Tue Nov 12 1996 12:321
9.4661WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSTue Nov 12 1996 14:333
9.4662SALEM::DODAVisibly shaken, not stirredTue Nov 12 1996 14:431
9.4663ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RThu Nov 21 1996 14:486
9.4664BRAT::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::LongWtaxation without representationThu Nov 21 1996 16:147
9.4665wishinHBAHBA::HAASbut the reply came from AnchorageFri Nov 22 1996 12:222
9.4666Forbes rates QB: BBJ #1HBAHBA::HAASbut the reply came from AnchorageFri Nov 22 1996 16:18114
9.4667BRAT::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::LongWtaxation without representationFri Nov 22 1996 16:295
9.4668another look at the contendersHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 02 1996 15:1130
9.4669reverse KOD alert! ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSMon Dec 02 1996 16:070
9.4670Mort Report: Lett, Bettis, etc.HBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 02 1996 17:53172
9.4671OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportMon Dec 02 1996 18:165
9.4672weirdHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 02 1996 18:248
9.4673OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportMon Dec 02 1996 18:307
9.4674CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westMon Dec 02 1996 18:358
9.4675what he saidHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 03 1996 13:1310
9.4676power ratingHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Dec 06 1996 14:1358
9.4677ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RMon Dec 09 1996 15:0851
9.4678Sounds Good To MeYIELD::BARBIERITue Dec 10 1996 12:3510
9.4679CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Dec 10 1996 12:405
9.4680contendersHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 10 1996 14:0161
9.4681tiebreakersHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 10 1996 14:04170
9.4682MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Dec 10 1996 19:284
9.4683CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westTue Dec 10 1996 22:229
9.4684nfl power rankingsHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Wed Dec 11 1996 13:1751
9.4685PECAD8::CHILDSWed Dec 11 1996 15:223
9.4686And the beat goes on!!OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportWed Dec 11 1996 18:2211
9.4687IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Wed Dec 11 1996 19:002
9.4688:*)GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Wed Dec 11 1996 19:024
9.4689MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Dec 11 1996 19:223
9.4690and that Holtz talk is over...SALEM::DODARetired Gnip Gnop ChampionWed Dec 11 1996 19:434
9.4691I'm not edittingSNAX::ERICKSONThu Dec 12 1996 18:54103
9.4692ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RThu Dec 12 1996 19:076
9.4693SNAX::ERICKSONThu Dec 12 1996 19:166
9.4694exMSBCS::BRYDIEJust cover, baby!Thu Dec 12 1996 19:366
9.4695ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RThu Dec 12 1996 19:4255
9.4696Number of Pro Bowlers per teamALFSS2::ROLLINS_RThu Dec 12 1996 19:4938
9.4697RE: .4691IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Fri Dec 13 1996 11:384
9.4698ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RMon Dec 16 1996 12:0298
9.4699MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Longtaxation without representationMon Dec 16 1996 12:549
9.4700GO PATS!~HBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 16 1996 13:1613
9.4701PECAD8::CHILDSMon Dec 16 1996 13:183
9.4702ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RMon Dec 16 1996 13:248
9.47032975::WAUGAMANMon Dec 16 1996 14:0415
9.4704could happen, possiblyHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 16 1996 14:238
9.4705ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RTue Dec 17 1996 03:5710
9.4706wassup?MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Longtaxation without representationTue Dec 17 1996 11:2813
9.4707SNAX::ERICKSONTue Dec 17 1996 11:4612
9.4708Huh?YIELD::BARBIERITue Dec 17 1996 11:519
9.4709Good Front offices helpedCSLALL::BRULEScooter Macgruder rulesTue Dec 17 1996 12:007
9.4710EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 17 1996 12:1818
9.4711ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RTue Dec 17 1996 12:2819
9.4712all that and moreHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 17 1996 12:5719
9.4713MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Longtaxation without representationTue Dec 17 1996 13:119
9.4714salary cap effectHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 17 1996 13:2024
9.4715CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westTue Dec 17 1996 14:0413
9.4716They'll play to win, like menEDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 17 1996 14:128
9.4717CHEFS::7A1_GRNThe long sobs of Autumn violinsTue Dec 17 1996 14:326
9.4718ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RTue Dec 17 1996 17:455
9.4719Yes, this means I've given up on this season...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 17 1996 18:3510
9.4720MSBCS::BRYDIEJust cover, baby!Tue Dec 17 1996 19:294
9.4721EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Dec 17 1996 19:3411
9.4722PECAD8::CHILDSWed Dec 18 1996 12:599
9.4723MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Longtaxation without representationWed Dec 18 1996 13:137
9.4724another Boomer fanHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Wed Dec 18 1996 13:179
9.4725CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Dec 18 1996 13:3010
9.4726they sipSALEM::DODARetired Gnip Gnop ChampionWed Dec 18 1996 13:367
9.4727CSLALL::BRULEScooter Macgruder rulesWed Dec 18 1996 13:543
9.4728great adsHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Wed Dec 18 1996 13:588
9.4729CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Dec 18 1996 14:159
9.4730Berman once was God, not no moreEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 18 1996 14:1513
9.4731another bit o' luckHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Wed Dec 18 1996 14:186
9.4732CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Dec 18 1996 14:207
9.4733PECAD8::CHILDSWed Dec 18 1996 14:383
9.4734despondentHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Wed Dec 18 1996 14:437
9.4735CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Dec 18 1996 14:447
9.4736EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 18 1996 14:4520
9.4737but how 'bout Ronnie Lott?HBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Wed Dec 18 1996 14:528
9.4738And yes them Sportscenter commercials are great..WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSWed Dec 18 1996 15:045
9.4739not too bad, but ...HBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Wed Dec 18 1996 15:089
9.4740Poor Job With PatsYIELD::BARBIERIWed Dec 18 1996 15:3511
9.4741Power rankingsHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Wed Dec 18 1996 15:3949
9.4742I'd take Glanville in a second over him.SALEM::DODARetired Gnip Gnop ChampionWed Dec 18 1996 15:493
9.4743him tooHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Wed Dec 18 1996 15:537
9.4744CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Dec 18 1996 17:166
9.4745"Man! Did you see that snot fly?"EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Dec 18 1996 17:189
9.4746CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Dec 18 1996 17:2313
9.4747PECAD8::CHILDSThu Dec 19 1996 14:185
9.4748speaking of...SALEM::DODAI'm BATMAN!Thu Dec 19 1996 17:421
9.4749WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Thu Dec 19 1996 18:198
9.4750CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Dec 20 1996 11:547
9.4751WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Fri Dec 20 1996 12:122
9.4752PECAD8::CHILDSFri Dec 20 1996 12:413
9.4753EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Dec 20 1996 13:5013
9.4754New York New York what a wonderful townCSLALL::BRULEScooter Macgruder rulesFri Dec 20 1996 15:564
9.4755WGAF?ODIXIE::ZOGRANNo directions neededFri Dec 20 1996 16:548
9.4756NQOS01::nqsrv130.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchPee Wee Herman's bodydoubleFri Dec 20 1996 19:405
9.4757CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Dec 23 1996 12:019
9.4758Morty not welcomed in Kansas CityCSLALL::BRULEScooter Macgruder rulesMon Dec 23 1996 12:144
9.4759WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Mon Dec 23 1996 12:5011
9.4760MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Longtaxation without representationMon Dec 23 1996 13:016
9.4761BIGQ::MCKAYMon Dec 23 1996 14:044
9.4762only 1 favoriteWONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Tue Dec 24 1996 12:452
9.4763Even a blind squirrel finds a nutIMINMK::SILVESTRIPenuts Gang turns 10 in 1997!Tue Dec 24 1996 13:2712
9.4764Hope You're RightYIELD::BARBIERITue Dec 24 1996 16:567
9.4765why notHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Thu Dec 26 1996 14:2124
9.4766ALFSS2::ROLLINS_RSun Dec 29 1996 03:0113
9.4767PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Mon Dec 30 1996 12:116
9.4768ho humHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 30 1996 12:3320
9.4769Sagarin's opinionHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 30 1996 18:3736
9.4770IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Dec 30 1996 18:573
9.4771PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Tue Dec 31 1996 11:144
9.4772PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Tue Dec 31 1996 11:170
9.4773RE: .4772IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Tue Dec 31 1996 11:522
9.4774CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Dec 31 1996 12:085
9.4775what no smiley????PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Tue Dec 31 1996 12:345
9.4776EDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Tue Dec 31 1996 12:3713
9.4777sorryHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 31 1996 13:4020
9.4778MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Longtaxation without representationTue Dec 31 1996 14:069
9.4779IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Tue Dec 31 1996 14:182
9.4780playin golf with the Bills....PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Tue Dec 31 1996 14:223
9.4781forecastsHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 15:3420
9.4782EDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Fri Jan 03 1997 16:0810
9.4783MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Longtaxation without representationFri Jan 03 1997 16:217
9.4784EDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Fri Jan 03 1997 16:2611
9.4785BRAT::FORTIN_CWhere's the Spirit, Where's the GutsFri Jan 03 1997 16:307
9.4786keep it softHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 16:408
9.4787SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jan 03 1997 19:4910
9.4788GO PACK!!!YIELD::BARBIERISun Jan 05 1997 14:4112
9.4789ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsMon Jan 06 1997 11:328
9.4790Anybody but the Patriots!PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 06 1997 11:4810
9.4791still in recoveryMKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBMon Jan 06 1997 12:1718
9.4792CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jan 06 1997 12:1916
9.4794DELNI::FORGETMon Jan 06 1997 12:2310
9.4795MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manMon Jan 06 1997 12:3111
9.4796Great games this past weekendODIXIE::ZOGRANNo directions neededMon Jan 06 1997 12:3114
9.4797PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 06 1997 12:346
9.4798Pack StuffYIELD::BARBIERIMon Jan 06 1997 12:3733
9.4799SALEM::DODAHow could we know that promises end?Mon Jan 06 1997 12:444
9.4800MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manMon Jan 06 1997 12:4714
9.4801IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Jan 06 1997 12:524
9.4802MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manMon Jan 06 1997 12:5311
9.4803OuchEDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'D is GawdMon Jan 06 1997 12:5825
9.4804Clemson refs lose outODIXIE::ZOGRANNo directions neededMon Jan 06 1997 13:0813
9.4805Don't go abbreviatin' on me!IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Jan 06 1997 13:105
9.4806CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jan 06 1997 13:1422
9.4807unbelievableHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyMon Jan 06 1997 13:2115
9.4808A team in declineMSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manMon Jan 06 1997 13:4110
9.4809MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBMon Jan 06 1997 14:0610
9.4810looked like a fix, smelt like a fix, ...HBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyMon Jan 06 1997 14:0914
9.4811That's coaching and executionEDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'D is GawdMon Jan 06 1997 14:1517
9.4812PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingMon Jan 06 1997 15:207
9.4813Jax will be jacked gotta come out with the same fireAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Jan 06 1997 15:3815
9.4814MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manMon Jan 06 1997 15:588
9.4815Cowher blew it againMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Jan 06 1997 19:4115
9.4816I'm sure he just forgot....MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBMon Jan 06 1997 19:506
9.4817????YIELD::BARBIERIMon Jan 06 1997 19:575
9.4818That reporter got luckyMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Jan 06 1997 20:369
9.4819For The RecordYIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 07 1997 12:0852
9.4820EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdTue Jan 07 1997 13:1613
9.4821EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdTue Jan 07 1997 13:3413
9.4822MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manTue Jan 07 1997 14:1913
9.4823AgreeYIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 07 1997 14:4510
9.4824not as goodHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyTue Jan 07 1997 15:476
9.4825SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jan 07 1997 15:558
9.4826the more they expand the lower the levelMKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBTue Jan 07 1997 17:2613
9.4827sign me upHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyTue Jan 07 1997 17:317
9.4828Early Draft HBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyTue Jan 07 1997 17:3818
9.4829EVMS::MDNITE::RIVERSNo commentTue Jan 07 1997 17:538
9.4830Playoff rostersHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyTue Jan 07 1997 17:58276
9.4831Cowher simply blew itMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 07 1997 22:0914
9.4832PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 08 1997 11:264
9.4833MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBWed Jan 08 1997 11:286
9.4834must be just waking from his napMKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBWed Jan 08 1997 11:376
9.4835EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 12:1717
9.4836MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 08 1997 13:1122
9.4837EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 13:3113
9.4838MKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBWed Jan 08 1997 13:567
9.4839coulda beenHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyWed Jan 08 1997 13:561
9.4840MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 08 1997 14:2611
9.4841My eyes are open-- get your prescription fixed, wouldya?EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 14:4913
9.4842MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 08 1997 16:5913
9.4843EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 17:0720
9.4844MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 08 1997 17:1510
9.4845You're killing me billte...EDWIN::WAUGAMANSteelers are punks-- O'Donnell is GawdWed Jan 08 1997 17:2622
9.4846billte == comic extrordinaireMKOTS3::LONGBradshaw better commentator than QBWed Jan 08 1997 17:559
9.4847MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 08 1997 18:2426
9.4848Objectivity from a Steeler fanFABSIX::D_HORTERTFri Jan 10 1997 00:4211
9.4849KIND OF OBJECTIVEFABSIX::R_LUCHT&quot;Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof&quot;Fri Jan 10 1997 03:593
9.4850MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Jan 10 1997 13:298
9.4851I wish you were here, the weather is beautifulHBAHBA::HAASExpansion BoyFri Jan 10 1997 17:149
9.4852FYI - DEC and Jaguar connectionPHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Fri Jan 10 1997 19:4628
9.4853MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Jan 13 1997 18:5729
9.4854OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportMon Jan 13 1997 19:468
9.4855Seems ContradictoryYIELD::BARBIERIMon Jan 13 1997 19:5810
9.4856RTL::ROSESteve RoseMon Jan 13 1997 20:0713
9.4857MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Jan 13 1997 20:4012
9.4858bah!WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Mon Jan 13 1997 23:0018
9.4859Not Quite...YIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 14 1997 10:4913
9.4860OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportTue Jan 14 1997 13:364
9.4861PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Tue Jan 14 1997 13:411
9.4862WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Tue Jan 14 1997 13:542
9.4863OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportTue Jan 14 1997 14:313
9.4864WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Tue Jan 14 1997 18:023
9.4865CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Jan 15 1997 12:457
9.4866OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportMon Jan 20 1997 17:043
9.4867CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jan 20 1997 17:509
9.4868MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Jan 20 1997 18:146
9.4869IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Jan 20 1997 18:233
9.4870SALEM::DODAOne World within....Mon Jan 20 1997 18:319
9.4871MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Jan 20 1997 18:444
9.4872SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jan 20 1997 18:4733
9.4873SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jan 20 1997 18:486
9.4874PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Mon Jan 20 1997 19:592
9.4875ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 20 1997 20:123
9.4876WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Tue Jan 21 1997 11:4413
9.4877the guy can't stay calm in a broadcast booth...IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Tue Jan 21 1997 11:495
9.4878CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jan 21 1997 12:021
9.4879CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jan 21 1997 12:023
9.4880EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 21 1997 12:529
9.4881was unemployed all of 3 days - should do well there tooPHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Tue Jan 21 1997 13:401
9.4882CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jan 21 1997 14:1117
9.4883Scorecard pleaseMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 21 1997 15:136
9.4884I'll have to learn to spell itAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherTue Jan 21 1997 15:164
9.4885OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportTue Jan 21 1997 15:213
9.4886PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Tue Jan 21 1997 15:482
9.4887MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Tue Jan 21 1997 16:2714
9.4888Oops sorry for the missing wMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 21 1997 16:342
9.4889SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jan 21 1997 17:0112
9.4890PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingTue Jan 21 1997 17:042
9.4891NQOS01::nqsrv345.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchPee Wee Herman's bodydoubleWed Jan 22 1997 13:201
9.4892CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jan 27 1997 12:3744

Time passes with all the cruelty of a woman toying with your affections, and
the inexorable swiftness of a storm-driven tide wiping clean all that stands
before it on the shore.  Then, like accountants with our hands caught in the
till, we stutter and stammering trying to atone for the months and years that
have slipped through our fingers like water.

I was eight years old.  My life was no more complicated than it had ever been,
and no more simple than it ever would get.  All I had to worry about was the
occasional homework assignment from school, practicing for the music lessons I
had just started taking, playing ball with my brother and the neighborhood
kids, and watching ball on TV.

I rememeber distinctly kneeling in church, St. Paul's Roman Catholic in the
center of Glastonbury, that January morning, praying to the God I worshipped
with that innocent faith a child has.  "Please, God," I prayed, "Let the
Packers win."

I seriously doubt it was my prayer that helped them, because the Lombardi sweep
worked with or without Divine intervention, but it worked that day, along with
a second string wide receiver who'd worked a little too hard partying the night
before, a get-it-done quarterback who'd played for the Bear, a hard-nosed
middle linebacker, and the man who was the architect of their glory, the great
Vince Lombardi.

It wasn't even called the Super Bowl then, and it wasn't sold out.  It was
simply the NFL-AFL Championship Game, and Vince Lombardi's Packers beat up on
the Kansas City Chiefs.  My first and foremost memories are the game are not
the adult memories, voiced-over by the late John Facenda, but those of a child,
rooting hard for his favorites, and feeling so glad they won.

It felt strange then, to watch last night's game.  For the first time in almost
thirty years, the Packers were playing for the Super Bowl championship.  The
players names were all different, and there scarcely a two-bar facemask to be
seen in the building.  But the Packers carried with them the legacy of those
years under the man I feel was, arguably, the best coach in NFL history, a
legacy just as powerful now as the Lombardi sweep was back then.

So where, I wondered, have all the years gone?  It seemed like only yesterday
when it was Bart Starr, Max McGee, Jerry Kramer, and Ray Nitschke, and Lombardi
prowled the sidelines.  Am I really that old?  Has the time gone that quickly?

Yes, I'm afraid it has.....
9.4893CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Jan 27 1997 12:4411
  When I was down at the cape a couple years ago I ran into an older guy who
was running a B&B. Him and another guy from Jersey were talking about how in
their city the villages were known by the name of their Church. He said that
when he went to Highschool, Vince Lombardi was the football coach and the
chemistry teacher. 

  He went on to say that although no big talent player ever played on his
highschool team and hardly anyone went on to play in college, Lombardi's
highschool teams almost never lost. He was the greatest at every level.

  George
9.4894ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 27 1997 12:471
    CHOKE
9.4895CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jan 27 1997 12:5024
>their city the villages were known by the name of their Church. He said that
>when he went to Highschool, Vince Lombardi was the football coach and the
>chemistry teacher. 

One of Parcell's coaches was a student and player for Lombardi.


I think that Lombardi did so much more than coach.  He molded his players into
successful people.  If you've ever read _Run_To_Daylight_, the tenets and
precepts that come through regarding football, are equally applicable to life
in general.

My favorite is:

	The glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time you
	fall.



>  He went on to say that although no big talent player ever played on his
>highschool team and hardly anyone went on to play in college, Lombardi's
>highschool teams almost never lost. He was the greatest at every level.

Yeah, that's Lombardi....8^)
9.4896ROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Jan 27 1997 13:222
    
    TWO WORDS ---> CHOCK!
9.4897OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportMon Jan 27 1997 14:188
    
    
    Congratulations to the Packers, they played a good, mistake free game. The
    Patriots gave a good account of themselves, but made too many mistakes
    to win against a NFC team. 
    
    
    Will the afc ever win another SB?   
9.4898an outsiders viewMKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationTue Jan 28 1997 02:3832
    I know I've said it before (so I'm not getting that old),
    but I'll never understand if I live to be a hundred why
    in the region known as New England sports fans old and 
    young become ardent supporters of teams they have no
    regional connection to.  I can see 'Saw being a Giants
    fan given the area where he grew up being kinda midway
    between New Yuck City and Beantown.  But I know of no
    kid who grew up in Western PA who would ever admit to
    praying for a team that wasn't from that area.  I don't
    care if the Steelers were signed up for tee times, which
    when I was growing up the were, or not.  You might have
    a passing fancy for some other team, but you NEVER, and I
    do mean NEVER, would call yourself a fan of some other 
    team.  Most folks from other areas of the country seem
    to follow suit.  
    
    In these days of mega-marketing kids will wear the logo
    of their current superstar, or the team that just won the
    championship no matter where they live.  But that's not
    who I'm talking about.  I'm refering to the Baby Boomers
    who grew up thinking PF Flyers were without a doubt some
    miracle of modern science that really did improve your
    leaping ability.  Those sports fans were true blue to the
    hometown team no matter how bad they sucked.  That is,
    except in New England.
    
    Folks have tried to tell be about the Babe Ruth Jinx, but
    to me it just doesn't sink in.  Something tells me it
    never will.
    
    
    billl
9.4899IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Tue Jan 28 1997 11:294
    
    What was the diatribe in .4898 based on, Wile E.?  For a second I
    thought it had "MKOTS3::BREEN" in the header...
    
9.4900PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingTue Jan 28 1997 11:487
 It's called freedom of choice Bill. In New England we have so much more than
 just Sports, that we become more rounded in our choices..............

 ;^)

 skippy
9.4901CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Jan 28 1997 11:5217
  Well I guess the question on the other side of the coin is, why SHOULD you
be limited to a team in your geographical area?

   If teams were made up of players who were from your area and if coaches came
from your area then sure. For the most part it works that way in highschool,
the kids on the team are the same kids in your class. But pro sports are
different. Always have been. Players come from anywhere, coaches come from
anywhere, the GM comes from anywhere, some times even the owners are not local.

  If you see a team that has players you like better or a team philosophy you
like better why not be a fan? Conversely, if you are turned off by the players
or the philosophy of the local team why should you be restricted?

  It's a free country (or at least we like to think it is), why have rules
saying what team you can and what team you can't support?

  George
9.4902CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westTue Jan 28 1997 12:1510
    
    billl,
    
    If I was to guess, I'd probably say that the different behavior is a
    result of TV.  Before the ESPNs and game of the weeks... all people had
    were 4 minutes on the news and a newspaper that never covered, beyond
    the AP story, any other teams than a local one.
    
    Marc
    
9.4903exMSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Jan 28 1997 12:169
     Most of the people wearing gear of other teams
    are frontrunners. You never see anybody with a
    Tamp Bay Bucs or New Orleans Saints jersey up here.
    Mainly, it's the Cowboys, 9ers or the occasional
    Steelers or Dolphins. Nowadays alot of them are trying 
    to pass themselves off as Pats fans but give them
    two or three bad seasons and they'll move on to
    a new team. 
9.4904This could be good...EDWIN::WAUGAMANTue Jan 28 1997 12:218
>    What was the diatribe in .4898 based on, Wile E.?  For a second I
>    thought it had "MKOTS3::BREEN" in the header...
    
    Breen was a NY Giants fan... expect a diatribe in response...
    
    glenn
    
9.4905CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jan 28 1997 12:4528
The first team I ever rooted for was the Green Bay Packers.  Probably because
we saw them on TV a lot when I was young, along with the Giants.  Being a kid,
I knew nothing of some of the bitter games between the two, so I rooted for
both.  It made sense to me that one was in the Western Division, the other in
the Eastern Division.

I had two favorite Giants -- Homer Jones and Tucker Fredrickson.  I had a mess
of favorite Packers (and as a hint of my great respect later in life for
behemoth offensive linemen, one of them was Gerry Kramer).


I think if you live in a locality, you automatically root for that team.  But
with football, because of television and the old AFL-NFL split, you have some
different allegiances.

As a kid, I was an NFL bigot.  The sissy teams in the AFL sucked.  And yep, my
nose hurt just as bad as the other NFL bigot's noses the day Joe Willie came to 
town.  Kind of woke me up.


In Connecticut, you have a lot of folks who have split allegiance between NY
and Boston, but if you look at mine, the football allegiance to NY is based on
TV -- I never watched the Boston Patriots.  The rest of my alliances are pretty
much Boston based....  Tried the Whalers for a while (that "local" thing) but
came back to where I belonged eventually....


'Saw
9.4906CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Jan 28 1997 12:5020
RE                     <<< Note 9.4904 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>

>    Breen was a NY Giants fan... expect a diatribe in response...
    
  Back in Bill's day the Giants were New England's home team. For that matter
back when I was a kid the AFL was just starting up and not many people outside
of Boston gave it much thought. Most of Western Mass where I grew up were
Giants fans.

  Those were the Y.A. Tittle days when Frank Gifford was strictly a flanker
back. I bet Bill goes back to the Charlie Conley days when Gifford ran the
ball.

  Not sure of the spellen's but names that come to mind were Andi Robistelli,
Jim Katkavage, Dick Mozuleski, Jim Lutzkatof, Jimmy Patton, Sam Huff, Y.A.
Tittle, Phil King, Frank Gifford, Dale Shofner ... quite a team.

  Good point a few back about the influence of TV.

  George
9.4907CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jan 28 1997 12:538
George, you did massacre the spellings, but you hit a lot of the Giants
favorites.  Most of them were gone just before I started really watching them.

Andy Robustelli ran a travel agency in southern CT last I knew, but he's
probably retired now.


'Saw
9.4908PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Jan 28 1997 13:274
        |                             -< an outsiders view >-

    Bill, what's even more incomprehensible are all the youngsters today
    who root for a player rather than a team.
9.4909need more infoHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Tue Jan 28 1997 13:375
>    who root for a player rather than a team.

Ya mean like KJ and not the Suns :=]

TTom
9.4910PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Jan 28 1997 13:391
    Could be any player TTom.
9.4911MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 28 1997 13:4114
    I agree with Billl 100%.  As a 50s Giants fan (there were no Patriots)
    I couldn't understand the few, the hopeless, the deficient who rooted
    for the Cleveland Browns.  Personally that 56-63 Giants team was my
    favorite team of all time except for the one 1967 Redsox team.
    
    In 1964 Allie Sherman cleaned out all the old stars, traded Huff,
    Tittle and Gifford lost it over night, Grier gone etc and I made a
    clean switch to the Patriots who had Harry Crump and Art Graham and
    other locals (Bellino).
    
    George had it pretty well wrapped up except for the zeal that Giants
    fans had for those immortal teams.  Five tough nfl championship losses
    from 1958-63 but preceded by some tremendous victories, mainly over Jim
    and Paul Brown and the hated, detested Cleveland Browns.
9.4912NQOS01::nqsrv307.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchInside IntelTue Jan 28 1997 13:448
I thinky Marc-y Mac 8^) got it right a few back about TV.  In the 60's it 
was the Giants on TV all the time, and they became popular in NE.  Now 
it's the Cowboys&Niners on TV all the time.  

And, if you think you got lots of fans from different teams there, ya 
oughta come out here.

Brews
9.4913CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Jan 28 1997 13:4816
RE               <<< Note 9.4908 by PHXSS1::HEISER "Maranatha!" >>>

>    Bill, what's even more incomprehensible are all the youngsters today
>    who root for a player rather than a team.

  Well that's not particularly a young man's issue either. Unless of course
you consider those of us hovering around 50 as young. I remember back in
the early 60's there were a lot of Willie Mays fans that didn't know much or
care much about the rest of the S.F. Giants. And I'll bet that back in the 20's
and 30's there were a lot of Babe Ruth fans that were not necessarily New
York Yankee fans.

  As for the 19th Century, keep in mind the poem is "Casey at the Bat", not
"Sad day for Mudville".

  George
9.4914SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jan 28 1997 14:276
    
    	For me its following the teams my Father and Grandfather followed
    plus the local NE teams. Since I'm from New York, it was always the
    Giants in Football and the Mets in baseball.
    
    Ron
9.4915Nope, No sir. I don't like it a bit.SUBSYS::BAILLIEUltraSCSI, myth or factTue Jan 28 1997 14:536
re:             <<< Note 9.4905 by CAM::WAY "and keep me steadfast" >>>
	'Saw
		What no Henry Long or Spider Lockhart!!!


	jb , who use to love the Dallas/NYG matchups of that era
9.4916CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Jan 28 1997 15:3311
>		What no Henry Long or Spider Lockhart!!!

Spider I remember.  I was trying to list guys who left just before I started
watching.

Spider was always a favorite, and he died much too young.


Late 50s, early 60s the Giants had a powerful defense, that actually received
some recognition, which annoyed the offensive stars.  They had Landry and
Lombardi as assistant coaches -- what a tandem, eh?
9.4917AMERICA'S TEAMYIELD::BARBIERITue Jan 28 1997 15:424
      Well, I had yesterday off and am really busy right now, but
      just to let you know, I am a VERY happy camper!!!
    
    						Tony
9.4918MKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationWed Jan 29 1997 03:1113
    re .4911:
    
    >    I agree with Billl 100%. 
    
    Now I know I was way off base.  
    
    George, no one said it was "against the rules".  I was only
    trying to verbalize what to most other areas of the country
    is an "unwritten law".  Now that in no way means some
    legislator wrote a bill.  It's more an accepted way of life.
    
    
    billl
9.4919CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsWed Jan 29 1997 11:5015
  So fine, it's a tradition. Like any tradition it's followed some places and
not followed others. 

  I believe the tradition started because prior to TV the home team was the
one fans were able to follow week after week. Also the tradition gets a boost
from highschool, semi-pro and amateur where you actually know the players. 

  But other than momentum I see no reason why the tradition should be followed.
Times have "ah-changed" again and now Cable, ESPN, and superstations make it
much easier to follow teams in other locations. If supporting the geographically
local team is what floats your boat then fine. However if you choose to by pass
that particular tradition and support someone else then why not? After all
it's only entertainment.

  George
9.4920MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 29 1997 16:055
    
      If it's cool to follow teams from other parts of the country
     then why are you so worried about the patsies moving if you 
     don't actually go to games? You could always just follow them
     on tv like you've been doing since they started winning.
9.4921 Marvin + Nancy = Ralph MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 29 1997 16:4414
    Tommy, hold on there.  He's already attended several Redsox games in
    the last few years not to speak of an attendance at the Fleet Center
    for a Marvin Hammlisch at the piano, pretty maids a skating
    extravaganza.  And if the Patriots go indoors in Boston where he can
    take the T he vowed to make a game or two.  So what's a problem?  Not
    enough sports events.
    
    My wife loves figure skating and I swear I'm going to take her to one
    of those events if the pepcid research people can find something that
    would handle Ralph.
    
    Trivia for real sports fans.  What on the dial when surfing the tv
    makes you flip faster than FS ?  No, line dancing is only .0002
    millisecs.
9.4922CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsWed Jan 29 1997 16:466
  When did I ever say I was worried about the Pats leaving?

  In fact I do cheer for remote teams such as the Braves.

  George
9.4923boink-ka boink-ka boink ...CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsWed Jan 29 1997 16:489
RE                <<< Note 9.4921 by MKOTS3::BREEN "Sans Doute" >>>

>    Trivia for real sports fans.  What on the dial when surfing the tv
>    makes you flip faster than FS ?  No, line dancing is only .0002
>    millisecs.

  College Basketball.

  George
9.4924criminalHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Wed Jan 29 1997 16:5911
>  College Basketball.

My current pet peave is the TV listings which intermingle Men's college
hoops with women's. You scan the list and right after Georgia Southern
playing UT-Chattanooga, you see something like Wake vs Duke only to
discover that it aint Tim Duncan going up against Greg Newton but the
distaffs.

They oughta be listed under some other heading, at least.

TTom
9.4925PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 29 1997 17:062
 Syncronized Swimming.........
9.4926MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 29 1997 17:069
  >> When did I ever say I was worried about the Pats leaving?
    
     It was pretty much the basis of your whole let's build beggin'
     Bob a stdium spiel. That and the misguided notion that there's
     an economic benefit from an NFL stdium to anyone but the owner.
     I quote, "I want an NFL franchise in town and I'm willing to pay
     my fair share to see that happen." According to what you're saying 
     now your "fair share" is your cable bill.
9.4927MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 29 1997 17:076
>    Trivia for real sports fans.  What on the dial when surfing the tv
>    makes you flip faster than FS ?  No, line dancing is only .0002
>    millisecs.

     Feminine hygiene commercials but I guess that's the same thing.
9.4928CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed Jan 29 1997 17:0914
Quicker than FS?


For me that would be any of the following:


	o That Scottish boob with the non-stick cookware infomercial.

	o Any Richard Simmons infomercial

	o Tony "I'm John Elway's Twin Dental Brother" Robbins
	

	
9.4929some that botherHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Wed Jan 29 1997 17:1221
While nothing really comes close to the instantaneous flipping that
figger skating causes, there are some sprots that are close.

I really have a hard time with any kinda tennis. Put 'em on skates and
ice and you might have something.

MLB is a time honored sprot to avoid like the plague. I see no such easy
solution here.

After seeing _Kingpin_ I find myself watching a little bowling just to
see if'n the guys hand stays with the ball and lumbers down the lane with
it.

Women's hoops does nothing for me. I much prefer the shoe commercial
where all of 'em where high heels. I find myself fantasizing that they're
in prison and wearing nothing else. That'd make it something worth
watching.

And of course, if'n I never see another soccer match it'd be too soon.

TTom
9.4930CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsWed Jan 29 1997 17:1421
RE            <<< Note 9.4926 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>     It was pretty much the basis of your whole let's build beggin'
>     Bob a stdium spiel. That and the misguided notion that there's
>     an economic benefit from an NFL stdium to anyone but the owner.
>     I quote, "I want an NFL franchise in town and I'm willing to pay
>     my fair share to see that happen." According to what you're saying 
>     now your "fair share" is your cable bill.

  This is an entirely different argument than the one that we are having here.
Even if I personally support having a local team that does not mean I fell that
people should be bound by tradition to only cheer for local teams. 

  I would still like to see a new Stadium for the Patriots and I would still
like to see them stay in the Greater Boston area but I have no problem with
someone who wants to live in one part of the country and cheer for a team
that is located somewhere else.

  Really, I don't see any connection between the two issues.

  George
9.4931my tree of woe is the doughMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 29 1997 17:1911
    	Or the dandruff commercial with the "break a leg".  That was voted
    the worst commercial back about '92 and it's still airing, every day on
    a host of channels.
    
    	I do like them Dukes of Hazzard except when they do the cousins
    instead of Luke Duke etal.  And if Waylon is croon'n that's sure to be
    a good'n.
    
    	And speak'n of flipp'n thru the guide, I missed Conan the Barbarian
    last Saturday.  He'd just lit up his ex and it was CdaB not CdaD with
    Wilt.  CdaB is just about the best movie ever filmed.
9.4932another vote for ConanHBAHBA::HAASDorsey Levens Roolz!~Wed Jan 29 1997 17:285
>    CdaB is just about the best movie ever filmed.

It gets a top rating from this noter as well.

TTom
9.4933PHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Wed Jan 29 1997 17:314
    Re: bowling
    
    Anything where higher consumption of alcoholic beverages improve your
    score is not a sport.
9.4934MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 29 1997 18:2213

    >> I would still like to see a new Stadium for the Patriots and 
    >> I would still like to see them stay in the Greater Boston area 
    >> but I have no problem with someone who wants to live in one part 
    >> of the country and cheer for a team that is located somewhere else.
    
       I can understand why you wouldn't care who a given person cheers
       for regadless of where they live. What I don't get is how you 
       square that with wanting to build a stadium for to keep a team 
       that you won't go see anyways. That doesn't make any sense to me.
       Why not just call his bluff because if they move you can do what 
       you're doing anyways and watch 'em on tv when they're goin good.
9.4935CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsWed Jan 29 1997 18:4021
RE            <<< Note 9.4934 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>       I can understand why you wouldn't care who a given person cheers
>       for regadless of where they live. What I don't get is how you 
>       square that with wanting to build a stadium for to keep a team 
>       that you won't go see anyways. 

  While I defend the right to cheer for teams not in town and while I even do
it on occasion, there is still an advantage to having teams in town.

  Local teams create a lot of excitement. If you have a local team the papers
cater to fans who do restrict themselves to local clubs and print more
information about the team and the sports in general. More people take
interest and there is more discussion.

  In sort, it's fun to have a team in town, whether you are cheering for them
or not. Also, if they made it a dome instead of an open stadium then it might
make some sense to go to a winter game and they might even draw a Superbowl
or two. That would also be fun.

  George
9.4936Final score from the Dell: 2-2TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Wed Jan 29 1997 18:4014
    I stayed up and watched most of the Newcastle - Southampton match on
    ESPN2 the other night TTom - it was tremendous football.  Les Ferdinand
    scooped up a loose ball in the area and rammed it home for an early
    Newcastle lead, then ALan Shearer sent Rob Lee away with a gorgeous
    through ball, and Lee made no mistake, putting Newcastle up 2-nil with
    only seven minutes remaining.  But the weak Newcastle defense failed to
    clear a ball and left keeper Shaka Hislop defenseless in the 88th
    minute, bringing Southampton to 2-1.  Then, two minutes into injury
    time, Matthew LeTissier send the capacity crowd home happy with a rifle
    shot from 22 yards out that he tucked just inside the near corner,
    giving Southampton a point and spoiling Kenny Dalgleish's first game
    as Newcastle's new manager.
    
    NAZZ
9.4937MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 29 1997 19:2419
    >> If you have a local team the papers cater to fans who do restrict 
    >> themselves to local clubs and print more information about the team 
    >> and the sports in general. 

       How many of these Patriots articles do you read? I'm guessing not 
       many if at all.
    
    >> Also, if they made it a dome instead of an open stadium then it might
    >> make some sense to go to a winter game 
    
       You could always go in September, October or November.
    
    >> and they might even draw a Superbowl or two. 
    
       If the Patsies build a dome, they'll get the complimentary *one*
       SB like Detroit did. Boston is no party town especially in January.
       The corprate mucky-mucks and assorted highrollers that shell out the
       big bucks at the SB don't want to be here in January.
9.4938You sure we haven't had Dallas in town already?MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 29 1997 19:345
    Tommy your forgetting the big ice pageants: ice capades,ice follies,
    Disney on ice, Hamlisch on ice, legends of ice...
    
    The Cowboys would surely want to visit the Museums around town.  Come
    to think of it we are missing a few paintings...
9.4939OLD1S::CADZILLA2PM&amp;D PSE Tools SupportWed Jan 29 1997 19:413
    
    
    Has there been a shortage of Toot in beantown?
9.4940MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Jan 29 1997 19:5315
    
     The 'boys don't want to come Boston either. The infamous red 
    light district known as the Combat Zone is essentially gone. 
    The Naked I may still be there but the place is seedier than 
    the Burppee catalog and Princess Cheyenne if she's still working 
    has got to be pushing 60 and the sight of her may be enough to 
    put you off of women and booze. Fans of dance have to travel to 
    the hinterlands of the suburbs to see true arteests at work. And 
    for my money, a great red light district is more a delimeter of 
    a great city than a domed football stadium is. Last I checked Paris 
    didn't have a domed stadium but did have the dancing girlies down 
    at the Crazy Horse Saloon.  So if I have a vote let's spend our 
    tax money on some first class nudie bars and let the Indianpolises 
    of the world have the domed stadiums.
    
9.4941MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 29 1997 19:5612
    There's been no shortage of criticism of Parcells for his assumed
    departure.  By this time Tagliabue may have ruled but no one gives his
    staying much of a chance.  But if Tag ruled a high draft choice then
    Hess may want to just wait a year.
    
    Now does Parcells say, "Okay, for a lousy 1.2 mil I'll show up
    Sundays".  So Kraft says, take 800k and screw.  So Bill joins Howey and
    cro-magnon man and Ronnie and friends and prepares to coach the Jets in
    1998.
    
    Meanwhile who coaches the two teams in the meantime?  Wayne Fontes and
    Rich Kotite?
9.4942Can't Compare to the Frozen Tundra!!YIELD::BARBIERIWed Jan 29 1997 20:379
      Speaking of stadiums, I just have to reiterate what I have heard
      Madden say more than a couple times.
    
      "If there ever was a shrine for the NFL, it would be right here
      in LAMBEAU FIELD."
    
      The Pack is BY FAR the coolest team to root for!!!
    
    						Tony
9.4943one of God's gifts to MenPECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingThu Jan 30 1997 11:452
Geez Tommy don't be dissin' Princess Chey, she don't look a day over 45.
Cosmetic Surgey is wonderful thing.........
9.4944gotta love it....CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jan 30 1997 11:5911
>    last Saturday.  He'd just lit up his ex and it was CdaB not CdaD with
>    Wilt.  CdaB is just about the best movie ever filmed.


       
 "Conan, what is best in life?" 

 "To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the 
  lamentations of their women"   
                                                     - Conan the Barbarian

9.4945CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Jan 30 1997 12:0827
RE            <<< Note 9.4937 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>       How many of these Patriots articles do you read? I'm guessing not 
>       many if at all.
>    
>       You could always go in September, October or November.
>    
>       If the Patsies build a dome, they'll get the complimentary *one*
>       SB like Detroit did. Boston is no party town especially in January.
>       The corprate mucky-mucks and assorted highrollers that shell out the
>       big bucks at the SB don't want to be here in January.

  None of which has anything to do with the discussion at hand which is why
anyone would be a fan of a team that is not in town.

  Obviously if you like a team that's not in town you would probably be happier
if they lived closer but that may not be enough to make you stop being a fan.
For example, after the baseball Giants moved to San Francisco they still had a
lot of fans in Western Mass, some who like the team because they liked Willie
Mays and some who had gone to Springfield Giants AA games and knew the other
players on the team. 

  Now I'm sure they would have been happier if the Giants had come back to the
region and would have supported a stadium in the New York, Boston area but they
still liked the team anyway even though they were out in S.F. 

  George
9.4946beware of gift bearing geeksHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownThu Jan 30 1997 12:3415
Tony,

Careful about cozeying up to ol' Madden.

The onliest reason he's saying anything about the Pack is that his main
squeeze, the Cowboys, done got beat by the Painters, who he similarly
dissed. All Madden could get up for was Lambeau Field, Vince Lombardi and
the history of the team. He's still wishing it were Dallas winning the
big show.

But there are a lot of people who genuinely like them Pack. Bill Polian,
for example, is fixin to come calling for one of my main main on that
bandwagon, downtown Gilbert Brown. The Painters luv Gilbert Brown.

TTom
9.4947MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 30 1997 13:2821
  >> None of which has anything to do with the discussion at
  >> hand which is why anyone would be a fan of a team that is 
  >> not in town.

     This *is* the "discussion at hand". 

  >> Obviously if you like a team that's not in town you would 
  >> probably be happier if they lived closer but that may not 
  >> be enough to make you stop being a fan.

     I'd be happier if they lived closer so that I could actually
     go to games. But seeing as how you don't go to Pats games and
     you believe it's ok to be fans of remote teams. Why would you 
     care where they're located? You don't really follow them in the 
     paper and even if you did there's always the internet. And if you 
     really believe that the Braves are as much a Boston team as the 
     Red Sox as you stated before then why would the Pats should they 
     move be any less so when their departure would be more recent?
     Looking for a little consistency here.
    
9.4948tommy's hit on something hereTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Thu Jan 30 1997 13:489
    Re. 9.4940 - The first note I've read that has its priorities intact
    when it comes to what a first-class city really needs.  I say take that
    open space in South Boston and drop our own version of the French
    Quarter of New Orleans in there.  Bourbon Street north, as it were.
    That would do wonders for tourism, and bring people back into the city
    from the suburbs.  Would have to pass an ordinance allowing the selling
    of alcoholic beverages in paper cups, though.
    
    NAZZ
9.4949CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Jan 30 1997 14:0235
RE            <<< Note 9.4947 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>     I'd be happier if they lived closer so that I could actually
>     go to games. But seeing as how you don't go to Pats games and
>     you believe it's ok to be fans of remote teams. Why would you 
>     care where they're located? 

  First of all, your question only applies to me so regardless of the answer
it has little to do with whether other people should be allowed to support
teams out of town.

  But since you asked, I do support teams out of town however I would prefer
that they were near by and that their games were easy to attend. However that's
only one part of being a fan. While I would rather be able to attend Braves
games in person (which I did when I went to Atlanta Decus in '91) and I would
be happy if they came back to town (which they are in August) that does not
stop me from being a fan.

>You don't really follow them in the 
>     paper and even if you did there's always the internet. 

  I do read about them in the paper if it shows up before I leave in the
morning which is at best a 50-50 proposition. 

>And if you 
>     really believe that the Braves are as much a Boston team as the 
>     Red Sox as you stated before then why would the Pats should they 
>     move be any less so when their departure would be more recent?
>     Looking for a little consistency here.
    
  When did I ever say the Pats would be less a Boston team if they left? In
fact they did leave Boston just like the Braves but I didn't stop following
them just because they became the Providence Pats.

  George
9.4950MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 30 1997 14:4913
    >> But since you asked, I do support teams out of town however I 
    >> would prefer that they were near by and that their games were 
    >> easy to attend. 
     
       That's why I ask the question that you seem unwilling to answer
       which is, if you don't go to Pats games why do you care where 
       they're located to the point where you're even willing to spend
       good money to keep them? I can understand why a season ticketholder
       or even someone like myself who attends games when he can would
       want to keep them (though I won't give Kraft a dime more than
       the price of a ticket) but I don't get why folks who don't go
       to games want to throw money at Kraft.
9.4951Nothing like a $7 BudLEXSS1::MURPHYThu Jan 30 1997 15:058
    re: Princess Cheyenne
    
    Through a strange twist, I happen to know Cheyenne's whereabouts and
    real name.  Last place she worked was the Foxy Lady in Providence (she
    may still be there).  She married a Boston cop and live in the suburbs
    with a kid.
    
    Dan
9.4952PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingThu Jan 30 1997 15:446
yeah I saw here there about a year and half ago that's why I know she's not
a day over 45. Plus all that experience is a plus when perform a fine art like
dancing........

mc
9.4953CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Jan 30 1997 15:5716
RE            <<< Note 9.4950 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>       That's why I ask the question that you seem unwilling to answer
>       which is, if you don't go to Pats games why do you care where 
>       they're located to the point where you're even willing to spend
>       good money to keep them? 

  I've answered this several times. If they were in a dome down town which I
could get to by the T I'd go. I also said that I like having them around
because of the excitement created by having a local team. 

  And just to head you off before you take us around the loop again, no that
doesn't mean I don't believe you can support a team outside of town. It's just
more fun if your team is near by where you can go to the games.

  George
9.4954LEXSS1::MURPHYThu Jan 30 1997 16:585
    You can get to Foxboro Stadium via the T...
    
    Oops, there goes that excuse.
    
    Dan
9.4955CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Jan 30 1997 17:0913
  But there's still the thing about the dome.

  Also, commuting by Purple Line from Brighton involves 2 hours just coming
and going from home to South Station, never mind the train ride.

  Bus to Kenmore, Greenline to Park, Red Line to South Station, Train to
Foxboro then freeze your BE-hind on a metal bench.

  I'd rather take a shuttle from South Station to the Fan Pier area then
watch from a real seat under a dome at 68 degrees.

  George
9.4956just say no do domesHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownThu Jan 30 1997 17:1913
>  But there's still the thing about the dome.

Domes are great for basketball, baseball, figger skating and UFC bouts.

They oughta be outlawed for the manly sport of football. No dome and no
steenkin astroturf or other variants.

BTW, what you describe, George, sounds a whole lot like the Georgia Dome.
You get on MARTA and head on over right into it. And it has the added
feature that almost no one shows so a fan can walk right up and buy
hisself a ticket.

TTom
9.4957CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Jan 30 1997 17:288
  I agree games under a dome are not as much fun to watch as games in an
open stadium on grass, but it gets too dam cold in New England to sit outside
during a football game once winter roles around.

  Baseball, yes. Play it on grass but football on the carpet is no worse
than football on a frozen field while sitting in a frozen grandstand.

  George
9.4958MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 30 1997 17:309
    
      It's only a 30-40 minute ride to Foxboro from town if you 
     really wanted to see a game. My guess is that George wouldn't 
     go to a game even if they were downtown because of his previously
     stated fear of "drunken rowdies" which might be exacerbated 
     if they moved in-town. I tend to think the real reason he wants
     a football team in the region is simply to be able to vicariously
     share in the excitement that people who really support the team 
     feel.
9.4959MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 30 1997 17:355
    
    >> but it gets too dam cold in New England to sit outside
    >> during a football game once winter roles around.
    
       You don't go in September or October either.
9.4960bring on the coldHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownThu Jan 30 1997 17:3612
>  Baseball, yes. Play it on grass but football on the carpet is no worse
>than football on a frozen field while sitting in a frozen grandstand.

The same can be said of baseball when put this way.

For a minute, I thought that you might be getting ready to say that
football on carpet is no worse than on grass to which I vehemently
disagree.

As for the cold, I like it. Just drink some anti-freeze afore you go.

TTom
9.4961CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Jan 30 1997 17:4519
RE            <<< Note 9.4958 by MSBCS::BIRDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>      It's only a 30-40 minute ride to Foxboro from town if you 
>     really wanted to see a game. 

  That's a traffic jam I'd rather pass up.

>       You don't go in September or October either.

  If I have free time in September I go to Fenway and in October I'm watching
baseball playoffs. I like football but I like it next best after baseball. So
that leaves November and December. Figure one November home game you would have
to sit in pouring rain and by December it's pretty cold so that leaves maybe
one shot at a decent day to go to a game per year.

  A Dome down town would give you a choice of 7-8 games and if they have larger
seating capacity you might even be able to buy a ticket. 

  George
9.4962MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 30 1997 17:5611
  
    >> That's a traffic jam I'd rather pass up.

       The comfort of your own automobile will be preferrable to the
       cattle cars that you'd have to ride to a dome.
    
    >> If I have free time in September I go to Fenway and in October 
    >> I'm watching baseball playoffs. 
    
       In 30 years the Sox have never had an away game on a Sunday.
       Okey dokey. How much for that bridge you're selling? 
9.4963CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Jan 30 1997 18:2316
RE            <<< Note 9.4962 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>       In 30 years the Sox have never had an away game on a Sunday.
>       Okey dokey. How much for that bridge you're selling? 

  Turns out you can watch the Red Sox away games. They are on this new fangle
invention called the Tele-Vision or some such thing. If'en I were you I'd go
out and get me one of them things. And even if the Sox are not playing there
are usually other interesting baseball games involving various pennant races
during September.

  As for football I start watching as soon as the World Series ends. At that
point in time if I go I'd rather watch it in a Dome down town than in a cold
stadium out in the burbs. My preference. To which I have a right, I might add. 

  George 
9.4964PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingThu Jan 30 1997 18:261
Hey with a Domed stadium we could host the next Jackson 5 reunion tour...
9.4965MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 30 1997 18:5710
  >> Turns out you can watch the Red Sox away games. 
 
     And I'm sure you've never missed even one. Sure.
     And you're the type of pseudo-fan lobbying for a
     downtown dome because once the Sox have finished
     flopping for the 80th year in a row, you might
     want to take in a football game. *Might* but 
     probably not.
    
9.4966CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Jan 30 1997 19:0211
  Gripe, gripe, gripe, complain, complain, complain.

  Hey, this is entertainment. Everyone's entitled to express an opinion as
to what they would like to see.

  I'd rather have down town football in a dome. You'd rather have burb football
in a cow pasture. Everyone's got their preference.

  Geez, you'd think we were talking about something important here.

  George
9.4967BIGQ::MCKAYThu Jan 30 1997 19:116
    I don;t really care if they build a dome or an open air stadium, but
    to put it in Boston is a mistake.  Put it on the outskirts near
    some major highways.  Where they just put the Solomon pond mall would
    have been great. 
    
    Jimbo
9.4968CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westThu Jan 30 1997 19:5019
    
    >It's only a 30-40 minute ride to Foxboro from town
    
    Just here for a hit and run 8^)
    
    Let's see, it took me 45 minutes to go from Northeastern University
    (one of the Green Lines) to near the end of the Red Line (where one of
    the best bowling lanes was located).
    
    Are you trying to say that you can get from the Museum of science (on
    the Green Line) cross over to the Orange line using either the Red or
    Blue lines while waiting for trains, get over to South Station so you
    can catch a commuter train that runs once every two hours to catch a
    game in Foxboro in 30-40 minutes?  
    
    Maybe we should legalize whatever you are smoking.
    
    Marc
    
9.4969MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Jan 30 1997 19:594
    
      It's a 30-40 minute drive from Boston to Foxboro. George,
     who I was talking to, knew what I meant. You, who I wasn't,
     didn't.
9.4970Or a loaf, a jug and PattyMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Jan 30 1997 20:138
    From Kenmore you could take the greenline to Baystate station and pick
    up the train there.  Or drive to Dedham, about 20 minutes on a Sunday
    morning via J-way,vfw pkway.  If you drive just follow washington st.
    to the very end in So.Walpole and you're just about there.
    
    Pack the pate de foie gras, the mussels and that Chateau de ?, your
    Hamlisch records and have a little picnic prior to the game then slip
    over to the Lafayette House after for more of the same.
9.4971SALEM::LEVESQUE_TOh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!Fri Jan 31 1997 01:1811
    I don't like fake grass for any sport.  So if they build any stadium, I
    hope it's real grass.  For baseball, one of those retractable flip tops
    would be nice.  I don't know why Toronto put in fake when they had the
    opportunity to put in real grass.
    
    An article in SI several years ago made the point that maintenance
    costs for either were virtually equal.  The article did go on to say
    that many more, and more serious injuries occured on carpeted surfaces. 
    This more for football, of course.  Blown knees, turf toes, etc.
    
    	Ted
9.4972CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Jan 31 1997 12:5912
>    An article in SI several years ago made the point that maintenance
>    costs for either were virtually equal.  The article did go on to say
>    that many more, and more serious injuries occured on carpeted surfaces. 
>    This more for football, of course.  Blown knees, turf toes, etc.
    
Ted,

I'll have to put you in touch with that turf expert, George Young.  George
claims that fake turf causes no more injuries than real turf.  He's adamant
about that.

Then again, he's adamant that Dave Brown is an NFL caliber QB.....
9.4973keeping the faithHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownFri Jan 31 1997 13:035
>Then again, he's adamant that Dave Brown is an NFL caliber QB.....

So adamant he hires hisself a coach who swears by ol' Dave, too.

TTom
9.4974CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Jan 31 1997 13:057
|                             -< keeping the faith >-
|
|>Then again, he's adamant that Dave Brown is an NFL caliber QB.....
|
|So adamant he hires hisself a coach who swears by ol' Dave, too.

Oh yeah, you got dat right.
9.4975MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Fri Jan 31 1997 13:525
    
     It's a little ironic that Georgie wants to put the stadium
    in Southie which might be the NIMBY capital of the world when
    not all that long ago he himself was moaning about the impact
    that BC football games had on his neighborhood.
9.4976PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingFri Jan 31 1997 13:582
excuse my igonarance  NIMBY????????????
9.4977CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 31 1997 13:5822
RE            <<< Note 9.4975 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

    
>     It's a little ironic that Georgie wants to put the stadium
>    in Southie which might be the NIMBY capital of the world when
>    not all that long ago he himself was moaning about the impact
>    that BC football games had on his neighborhood.

  So Tommy, are you ready to admit yet that you essentially stuck your foot
in your mouth trying to make some sort of linkage between this debate and
the one which was going on? You know, the one having to do with whether or
not people should be prevented by tradition from rooting for teams not in
their geographical area.

  It was in the middle of that debate that you started whining and crying
about how I shouldn't be allowed an opinion as to where the Patriots new
Stadium should go. Are you going to try again to make a connection between
those two arguments or have you completely tossed in that towel?

  And if not, then just why did you bring all this up again?

  George
9.4978IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Fri Jan 31 1997 14:055
    .excuse my igonarance
    
    	Again?  :-)
    
    NIMBY == Not In My Back Yard
9.4979MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Fri Jan 31 1997 14:0611
    >> So Tommy, are you ready to admit yet that you essentially 
    >> stuck your foot in your mouth trying to make some sort of 
    >> linkage between this debate and the one which was going on? 
    >> You know, the one having to do with whether or not people 
    >> should be prevented by tradition from rooting for teams not in
    >> their geographical area.

       If you'll go back and check you'll see that I have no problem
       with folks cheering for a team not in their geographical area.
       None at all. Being a Florida State football fan myself. Now
       grab a towel and wipe that yoke off your puss.
9.4980PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingFri Jan 31 1997 14:131
thanks Roland.......
9.4981CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 31 1997 14:2717
RE            <<< Note 9.4979 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>       If you'll go back and check you'll see that I have no problem
>       with folks cheering for a team not in their geographical area.
>       None at all. Being a Florida State football fan myself. Now
>       grab a towel and wipe that yoke off your puss.

  You did argue at one point that there was some sort of relationship between
me cheering for teams that had left town and me wanting a stadium down town.
I answered that by saying that while I do cheer for teams out of town I'd
prefer they were local. Then you seemed to back off that argument.

  Now are you ready to agree that me cheering for teams like the Braves who
left the Boston area has nothing to do with me preferring to see my favorite
teams down town or do you still believe you have some sort of argument there?

  George
9.4982NIMBY = Not In My Back YardRTOMS::SHERMANSThe former MUNDIS::SSHERMANFri Jan 31 1997 14:409
Well, you guys did quite a job this week, trying to turn the NFL topic into
the Junk Note.  Tommy's .4940, about the relative merits of nudie bars and
domed stadiums on the cultural priority list, is already a leading candidate
for Note of the Year.

But this ongoing debate between George and Tommy is utterly pointless, as I
think George (at least) would agree.

Steve
9.4983MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Fri Jan 31 1997 14:4711
    >> I answered that by saying that while I do cheer for 
    >> teams out of town I'd prefer they were local. 
    
       So you could attend games. But you don't attend games now.
       You then came up with severeal excuses none of which seemed
       very valid. My only point is that you are the type of person
       we have voting for the in town dome. Someone with the most
       passing of interests in the Pats/Football who can't be bothered
       to travel 30-40 minutes to see a game but might attend a game 
       if the stadsium were brought to you. For my money, no, you
       should not have a vote.
9.4984SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jan 31 1997 14:498
    
    	Read in the paper yesterday that the Red Sox, were looking at the
    same exact site as the Patriots for a new baseball stadium. I wouldn't
    be surprised if they already have a back room deal with the Red Sox.
    Where they give the Red Sox the site, in return the Sox give the city.
    The land that Fenway Park is currently on.
    
    Ron
9.4985SALEM::DODAApparently a true story....Fri Jan 31 1997 15:046
Except that Mumbles says he wants the Sox to build where Fenway 
currently stands. No word from the genius on where they'd play 
during construction.

Quite a mayor you got there.

9.4986MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Fri Jan 31 1997 15:225
    
      I like it when Menino gets fiery (or passes for fiery from 
      him) about not building the stadium in South Boston as if 
      he's standing up for a principle (which he isn't) and not 
      cowing to political pressure (which he is).
9.4987CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 31 1997 15:4015
RE            <<< Note 9.4983 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

>       My only point is that you are the type of person
>       we have voting for the in town dome. Someone with the most
>       passing of interests in the Pats/Football who can't be bothered
>       to travel 30-40 minutes to see a game but might attend a game 
>       if the stadsium were brought to you. For my money, no, you
>       should not have a vote.

  ... and you made this "only point" in a debate about whether or not people
should be bound by tradition to support teams in their geographical area. 

  Logic has no place ...

  George
9.4988MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Fri Jan 31 1997 15:535
    >> ... and you made this "only point" in a debate about whether or 
    >> not people should be bound by tradition to support teams in their 
    >> geographical area. 
    
       There was no debate. 
9.4989CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 31 1997 15:554
  Fine, we all agree.

  George
9.4990there is some newsHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownFri Jan 31 1997 16:278
Meanwhile, Jim Kelly just announced his retirement.

And Joe Bugel is the new head main at the Raiders.

And the Pro Bowl is Sunday with the new guys, Capers and Coughlin,
at the helm.

TTom
9.4991Pro Bowl rostersHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownFri Jan 31 1997 16:5288
   
1997 Pro Bowl rosters
  __________________________________________________________________________
                                       
      (c) 1997 Copyright Nando.net
      (c) 1997 Associated Press
      
   (Jan 30, 1997 - 20:12 EST) -- The rosters for the 1997 NFL Pro Bowl,
   to be played Sunday, Feb. 2 at Aloha Stadium in Honolulu (x-starter,
   y-first-time Pro Bowl selection, z-injured, will not play; r-injury
   replacement):
   
  NFC
  
   Offense
   Wide Receivers: x-Jerry Rice, San Francisco; x-Herman Moore, Detroit;
   y-Isaac Bruce, St. Louis; Cris Carter, Minnesota.
   Tackles: x-Erik Williams, Dallas; x-William Roaf, New Orleans; Lomas
   Brown, Arizona.
   Guards: x-Larry Allen, Dallas; x-Randall McDaniel, Minnesota; Nate
   Newton, Dallas.
   Centers: x-Kevin Glover, Detroit; z-Ray Donaldson, Dallas; r-Frank
   Winters, Green Bay.
   Tight Ends: xy-Wesley Walls, Carolina; Keith Jackson, Green Bay.
   Quarterbacks: x-Brett Favre, Green Bay; z-Troy Aikman, Dallas; r-Gus
   Frerotte, Washington; z-Steve Young, San Francisco; r-Kerry Collins,
   Carolina.
   Running Backs: x-Barry Sanders, Detroit; xy-Terry Allen, Washington;
   Ricky Watters, Philadelphia.
   Fullback: Larry Centers, Arizona.
   
   Defense
   Ends: x-Reggie White, Green Bay; xy-Tony Tolbert, Dallas; William
   Fuller, Philadelphia.
   Interior Linemen: x-John Randle, Minnesota; xy-Bryant Young, San
   Francisco; Eric Swann, Arizona.
   Outside Linebackers: x-Kevin Greene, Carolina; xy-Lamar Lathon,
   Carolina; Ken Harvey, Washington.
   Inside Linebackers: x-Sam Mills, Carolina; Hardy Nickerson, Tampa Bay.
   Cornerbacks: xz-Deion Sanders, Dallas; x-Aeneas Williams, Arizona;
   Eric Davis, Carolina; Darrell Green, Washington.
   Safeties: x-LeRoy Butler, Green Bay; x-Merton Hanks, San Francisco;
   Darren Woodson, Dallas.
   
   Specialists
   Punter: y-Matt Turk, Washington.
   Placekicker: y-John Kasay, Carolina.
   Kick Return Specialist: y-Michael Bates, Carolina.
   Special Teamer: y-Jim Schwantz, Dallas.
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
  AFC
  
   Offense
   Wide Receivers: x-Carl Pickens, Cincinnati; xy-Tony Martin, San Diego;
   Tim Brown, Oakland; y-Keenan McCardell, Jacksonville.
   Tackles: xz-Gary Zimmerman, Denver; x-Bruce Armstrong, New England;
   Richmond Webb, Miami; Tony Boselli, Jacksonville.
   Guards: x-Bruce Matthews, Houston; x-Will Shields, Kansas City;
   y-Ruben Brown, Buffalo.
   Centers: x-Dermontti Dawson, Pittsburgh; Mark Stepnoski, Houston.
   Tight Ends: x-Shannon Sharpe, Denver; Ben Coates, New England.
   Quarterbacks: xz-John Elway, Denver; Drew Bledsoe, New England; r-Mark
   Brunell, Jacksonville; y-Vinny Testaverde, Baltimore.
   Running Backs: xy-Terrell Davis, Denver; x-Jerome Bettis, Pittsburgh;
   Curtis Martin, New England.
   Fullback: Kimble Anders, Kansas City.
   
   Defense
   Ends: x-Bruce Smith, Buffalo; xy-Alfred Williams; Denver; y-Michael
   Sinclair, Seattle.
   Interior Linemen: x-Cortez Kennedy, Seattle; x-Chester McGlockton,
   Oakland; Michael Dean Perry, Denver.
   Outside Linebackers: x-Derrick Thomas, Kansas City; xy-Chad Brown,
   Pittsburgh; Bryce Paup, Buffalo.
   Inside Linebackers: x-Junior Seau, San Diego; y-Levon Kirkland,
   Pittsburgh.
   Cornerbacks: xz-Dale Carter, Kansas City; xy-Ashley Ambrose,
   Cincinnati; Rod Woodson, Pittsburgh; Terry McDaniel, Oakland.
   Safeties: x-Carnell Lake, Pittsburgh; xz-Steve Atwater, Denver; Blaine
   Bishop, Houston; Eric Turner, Baltimore.
   
   Specialists
   Punter: y-Chris Gardocki, Indianapolis.
   Placekicker: y-Cary Blanchard, Indianapolis.
   Kick Return Specialist: David Meggett, New England.
   Special Teamer: y-John Henry Mills, Houston.
   
9.4992WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSFri Jan 31 1997 17:113
    
    
       Steve Wisniewski was Robbed!!!!
9.4993Gilbert BrownYIELD::BARBIERISun Feb 02 1997 13:436
      TTom,
    
        You can't have him!!  Actually, I have read that the Pack 
        considers him to be perhaps their #1 priority.
    
    						Tony
9.4994or dreamHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 13:256
It goes without saying that the Pack will do whatever it can to keep ol'
Gilbert. Caint blame 'em a bit.

But I can wish, hope, etc....

TTom
9.4995AFC Free AgentsHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 17:53430
   
   AFC free agents NFC free agents
   
   Updated Jan. 30
   
   The following lists were taken from SportsTicker. Official NFL
   free-agent designations will be released by the NFL on Feb. 15.
   
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Baltimore Ravens
   
   Unrestricted free agents (12)
   Randy Baldwin, RB
   Jeff Blackshear, OL
   Mike Caldwell, LB
   Mike Croel, LB
   Carwell Gardner, RB
   Keith Goganious, LB
   Eric Green, TE
   Stevon Moore, S
   Anthony Pleasant, DE
   Ed Sutter, LB
   Floyd Turner, WR
   Jerrol Williams, LB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (10)
   Vashone Adams, S
   Donny Brady, CB
   Dorian Brew, CB
   Sedric Clark, DE
   Dexter Daniels, LB
   Corey Dowden, CB
   Elliott Fortune, DT
   Sale Isaia, DT
   Quentin Neujahr, OL
   Scott Otis, QB
   
   Restricted free agents (2)
   Frank Hartley, TE
   Rick Lyle, DE
   
   Transition free agents (1)
   Steve Everitt, C
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Buffalo Bills
   
   Unrestricted free agents (4)
   Russell Copeland, WR
   Jim Kelly, QB
   Chris Mohr, P
   Steve Tasker, WR
   
   Restricted free agents (7)
   Rob Coons, TE
   Lonnie Johnson, TE
   Corbin Lacina, OL
   Corey Louchiey, OL
   Marlo Perry, LB
   Sam Rogers, LB
   David White, LB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (2)
   Jerry Ostroski, OL
   Tim Tindale, RB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Cincinnati Bengals
   
   Unrestricted free agents (7)
   Scott Brumfield, OL
   Andre Collins, LB
   Garrison Hearst, RB
   Rod Jones, CB
   Kevin Sargent, OL
   Brett Wallerstedt, LB
   Leonard Wheeler, S
   
   Restricted free agents (5)
   Jeff Cothran, RB
   Darnay Scott, WR
   Ramondo Stallings, DE
   Kimo Von Oelhoffen, DT
   Bracey Walker, S
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (1)
   Anthony Brown, OL
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Denver Broncos
   
   Unrestricted free agents (12)
   Aaron Craver, RB
   Tim Hauck, S
   Rondell Jones, S
   Mike Lodish, DT
   Reggie McElroy, OL
   Bill Musgrave, QB
   Reggie Rivers, RB
   Jeff Robinson, DE
   Tom Rouen, P
   T.J. Rubley, QB
   Ralph Tamm, OL
   Gary Zimmerman, OL
   
   Transition free agents (1)
   Shannon Sharpe, TE
   
   Restricted free agents (3)
   Allen Aldridge, LB
   Keith Burns, LB
   Maa Tanuvasa, DT
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (4)
   Dwayne Carswell, TE
   Byron Chamberlain, OL
   David Diaz-Infante, OL
   Ernest Jones, DE
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Houston Oilers
   
   Unrestricted free agents (6)
   Michael Barrow, LB
   Blaine Bishop, S
   Cris Dishman, CB
   Brad Hopkins, OL
   Steve Jackson, CB
   John Mills, LB
   
   Restricted free agents (3)
   Malcolm Floyd, WR
   Roderick Lewis, TE
   Barron Wortham, LB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (7)
   Lee Cole, CB
   Josh Evans, DT
   Lemanski Hall, LB
   Melvin Hayes, OL
   Lenoy Jones, LB
   James McKeehan, TE
   James Roberson, DE
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Indianapolis Colts
   
   Unrestricted free agents (6)
   Ray Buchanan, CB
   Eugene Daniel, CB
   Richard Dent, DE
   Kirk Lowdermilk, OL
   Tony Siragusa, DT
   Vince Workman, RB
   
   Restricted free agents (6)
   Aaron Bailey, WR
   Brad Banta, TE
   Jason Mathews, OL
   Brian Stablein, WR
   Damon Watts, CB
   Bernard Whittington, DT
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (6)
   Clif Groce, RB
   Paul Justin, QB
   Steve Morrison, LB
   Marcus Pollard, TE
   Kipp Vickers, OL
   Phil Yeboah-Kodie, OL
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Jacksonville Jaguars
   
   Unrestricted free agents (5)
   Derek Brown, TE
   Ben Coleman, OL
   Paul Frase, DE
   Ernie Logan, DE
   Dave Thomas, CB
   
   Restricted free agents (5)
   Richard Griffith, TE
   Ty Hallock, TE
   Greg Huntington, OL
   Willie Jackson, WR
   Randy Jordan, RB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (13)
   Brant Boyer, LB
   Bucky Brooks, WR
   Andre Davis, DT
   Travis Davis, S
   Nate Dingle, LB
   Chris Griffin, TE
   Mike Hollis, TE
   Jeff Kopp, LB
   Curtis Marsh, CB
   Tom McManus, LB
   Darren Studstill, S
   Rick Tylski, OL
   Jose White, LB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Kansas City Chiefs
   
   Unrestricted free agents (7)
   Louie Aguiar, P
   Keith Cash, TE
   Ricky Siglar, OL
   Neil Smith, DE
   Derrick Thomas, LB
   Keith Traylor, DT
   William White, S
   
   Restricted free agents (3)
   Donnell Bennett, RB
   Lake Dawson, WR
   Chris Penn, WR
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (3)
   Steve Matthews, QB
   Tony Richardson, RB
   J.J. Smith, RB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Miami Dolphins
   
   Unrestricted free agents (10)
   Randal Hill, WR
   Dwight Hollier, LB
   Tim Jacobs, CB
   Bernie Kosar, QB
   Louis Oliver, S
   Bernie Parmalee, RB
   Michael Stewart, S
   Danny Stubbs, DE
   Lamar Thomas, WR
   Frank Wainwright, TE
   
   Restricted free agents (2)
   Brett Carolan, TE
   Irving Spikes, RB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (1)
   O.J. Brigance, LB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   New England Patriots
   
   Unrestricted free agents (13)
   Troy Brown, WR
   Todd Collins, LB
   Mike Gisler, OL
   Jerome Henderson, CB
   Michael Jones, DE
   Vernon Lewis, CB
   Terry Ray, S
   Ricky Reynolds, CB
   David Richards, OL
   William Roberts, OL
   Dwayne Sabb, LB
   Chris Slade, LB
   Otis Smith, CB
   
   Restricted free agents (5)
   John Burke, TE
   Ferric Collons, DE
   Max Lane, OL
   Marty Moore, LB
   Larry Whigham, S
   
   Option Free Agents (2)
   Derrick Cullors, RB
   Josh Heinrich, DE
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (5)
   Chad Eaton, DT
   Hason Graham, WR
   Rupert Grant, RB
   Ray Lucas, CB
   Lovett Purnell, TE
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   New York Jets
   
   Unrestricted free agents (7)
   David Alexander, OL
   Harry Boatswain, OL
   Matt Brock, DT
   Mike Chalenski, DE
   Mark Gunn, DE
   Ron Moore, RB
   Webster Slaughter, WR
   
   Restricted free agents (3)
   Aubrey Beavers, LB
   Lou Benfatti, DT
   Eric Zomalt, S
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (9)
   Henry Bailey, WR
   Lance Brown, CB
   Chad Cascadden, LB
   Lou D'Agostino, DE
   Tyrone Davis, WR
   Bobby Hamilton, DE
   Eddie Mason, LB
   John Paci, QB
   Don Silvestri, P
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Oakland Raiders
   
   Unrestricted free agents (7)
   Paul Butcher, LB
   Darren Carrington, S
   Andrew Glover, TE
   Kevin Gogan, OL
   Michael Jones, LB
   Richard Stephens, OL
   Dan Turk, OL
   
   Transition free agents (1)
   Terry McDaniel, CB
   
   Restricted free agents (1)
   James Folston, LB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (3)
   Cole Ford, K
   Carl Kidd, CB
   Kenny Shedd, WR
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Pittsburgh Steelers
   
   Unrestricted free agents (11)
   Chad Brown, LB
   Deon Figures, CB
   Andre Hastings, WR
   Jonathan Hayes, TE
   Kevin Henry, DE
   Bill Johnson, DE
   Ernie Mills, WR
   Ray Seals, DE
   Mike Tomczak, QB
   Willie Williams, CB
   Rod Woodson, CB
   
   Restricted free agents (4)
   Myron Bell, S
   Randy Fuller, CB
   Jason Gildon, LB
   Eric Ravotti, LB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (2)
   Kirk Botkin, TE
   Corey Holliday, WR
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   San Diego Chargers
   
   Unrestricted free agents (11)
   Lewis Bush, LB
   Reuben Davis, DT
   Darrien Gordon, CB
   Dwayne Gordon, LB
   Dwayne Harper, CB
   Raylee Johnson, DE
   Tony Martin, WR
   Deems May, TE
   Walter Reeves, TE
   Leonard Russell, RB
   Harry Swayne, OL
   
   Restricted free agents (6)
   Willie Clark, CB
   Andre Coleman, WR
   Isaac Davis, OL
   Greg Engel, OL
   Shannon Mitchell, TE
   Vaughn Parker, OL
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (12)
   Arnold Ale, LB
   Tony Berti, OL
   Kevin Bouie, RB
   Joe Cummings, LB
   Vernon Edwards, DE
   Omar Ellison, WR
   Maurice Harrell, TE
   David Hendrix, S
   Mark Montreuil, CB
   Troy Sinkiewicz, OL
   Craig Whelihan, QB
   Glen Young, LB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Seattle Seahawks
   
   Unrestricted free agents (11)
   Robert Blackmon, S
   Ed Cunningham, OL
   Stan Gelbaugh, QB
   Carlton Gray, CB
   Michael McCrary, DE
   Glenn Montgomery, DT
   Joe Nash, DT
   Mike Pritchard, WR
   Tyronne Stowe, LB
   Ronnie Williams, TE
   Terry Wooden, LB
   
   Restricted free agents (3)
   Kevin Mawae, OL
   Lamar Smith, RB
   Gino Torretta, QB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (9)
   Mike Barber, OL
   Frank Beede, OL
   Coleman Bell, TE
   Eddie Goines, WR
   Oscar Gray, RB
   Dou Innocent, RB
   James Logan, RB
   Todd Peterson, P
   Patrick Riley, DE
9.4996NFC Free AgentsHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownMon Feb 03 1997 17:53540
   
  NFC free agents
  
   Updated Jan. 30
   
   The following lists were taken from SportsTicker. Official NFL
   free-agent designations will be released by the NFL on Feb. 15.
   
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Arizona Cardinals
   
   Unrestricted free agents (15)
   Michael Bankston, DE
   Ronnie Bradford, CB
   Kevin Butler, K
   Wendell Carter, TE
   Larry Centers, RB
   Matt Darby, S
   Mike Devlin, OL
   Ernest Dye, OL
   Anthony Edwards, WR
   David Johnson, CB
   Devon McDonald, LB
   Rob Selby, OL
   Joe Staysniak, OL
   Bernard Wilson, DT
   Joe Wolf, OL
   
   Restricted free agents (5)
   Marcus Dowdell, WR
   LeShon Johnson, RB
   J.J. McCleskey, CB
   Brad Ottis, DT
   Kendrick Redmon, OL
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (9)
   Tommy Bennett, S
   Blaine Berger, DT
   Ryan Christopherson, RB
   Jerry Drake, DE
   Kwamie Lassiter, S
   Chad May, QB
   Ronald McKinnon, LB
   Johnny McWilliams, TE
   Lance Scott, OL
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Atlanta Falcons
   
   Unrestricted free agents (22)
   Lester Archambeau, DE
   J.J. Birden, WR
   David Brandon, LB
   Brad Edwards, S
   Moe Gardner, DT
   Ron George, LB
   Bobby Hebert, QB
   Todd Kelly, DE
   Harper LeBel, TE
   Mitch Lyons, TE
   W. Matthews, LB
   Eric Metcalf, WR
   Browning Nagle, QB
   Nate Odomes, CB
   Jeff Pahukoa, OL
   Louis Riddick, S
   Elbert Shelley, CB
   Billy Joe Tolliver, QB
   Darnell Walker, CB
   Gene Williams, OL
   Mike Zandofsky, OL
   Jeff Zgonina, DT
   
   Restricted free agents (3)
   Bert Emanuel, WR
   Lenny McGill, CB
   Anthony Phillips, CB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (5)
   Sean Boyd, S
   Tyrone Brown, WR
   Scott Fields, LB
   Nate Miller, OL
   Freddie Scott, WR
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Carolina Panthers
   
   Unrestricted free agents (19)
   Carlton Bailey, LB
   Myron Baker, LB
   Duane Bickett, LB
   Mark Carrier, WR
   Bob Christian, RB
   Matt Elliott, OL
   Willie Green, WR
   Howard Griffith, RB
   Rocket Ismail, WR
   Anthony Johnson, RB
   Greg Kragen, DT
   Steve Lofton, CB
   Les Miller, DT
   Sam Mills, LB
   Mark Rodenhauser, OL
   Rod Smith, CB
   Rohn Stark, P
   Dwight Stone, WR
   Mark Thomas, DE
   
   Vested free agent (1)
   Chad Cota, S
   
   Restricted free agents (2)
   Ed Philion, DT
   Walter Rasby, TE
   
   Option Free Agents (2)
   Toi Cook, CB
   Brian Wiggins, WR
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (8)
   Jay Barker, QB
   Matt Campbell, OL
   Scott Greene, RB
   Brandon Hayes, OL
   Dino Philyaw, RB
   Damon Pieri, S
   Andre Royal, LB
   Syii Tucker, TE
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Chicago Bears
   
   Unrestricted free agents (11)
   Joe Cain, LB
   Kerry Cash, TE
   Albert Fontenot, DE
   Jerry Fontenot, OL
   Chris Gedney, TE
   Keith Jennings, TE
   Erik Kramer, QB
   Dave Krieg, QB
   Kevin Miniefield, CB
   Vinson Smith, LB
   Ryan Wetnight, TE
   
   Transition free agents (1)
   Donnell Woolford, CB
   
   Restricted free agents (7)
   Greg Briggs, S
   Todd Burger, OL
   Tony Carter, RB
   Jim Flanigan, DT
   Raymont Harris, RB
   Shane Matthews, QB
   Marcus Spears, OL
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (8)
   Clifton Abraham, CB
   Mark Butterfield, QB
   Rob Davis, DT
   Dana Howard, LB
   Dwayne Joseph, CB
   Anthony Marshall, S
   Bobby Neely, TE
   Carl Reeves, DE
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Dallas Cowboys
   
   Unrestricted free agents (17)
   Tyji Armstrong, TE
   William Bates, S
   Ray Childress, DT
   Derrick Frazier, CB
   Jason Garrett, QB
   John Jett, P
   Daryl Johnston, RB
   Derek Kennard, OL
   Brock Marion, S
   Kelvin Martin, WR
   Johnny Mitchell, TE
   Godfrey Myles, LB
   Darrin Smith, LB
   George Teague, S
   Broderick Thomas, DE
   Herschel Walker, RB
   Kevin Williams, WR
   
   Restricted free agents (3)
   Chris Boniol, K
   Hurvin McCormack, DT
   Jim Schwantz, LB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (4)
   Billy Davis, WR
   Wendell Davis, CB
   Tony Hutson, OL
   Dominique Ross, RB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Detroit Lions
   
   Unrestricted free agents (14)
   Bennie Blades, S
   Shane Dronett, DT
   Greg Jeffries, CB
   Thomas Johnson, LB
   Scott Kowalkowski, LB
   Don Majkowski, QB
   Aubrey Matthews, WR
   Ryan McNeil, CB
   Pete Metzelaars, TE
   Scott Mitchell, QB
   Zefross Moss, OL
   Brett Perriman, WR
   Robert Porcher, DE
   Mark Royals, P
   
   Restricted free agents (7)
   Thomas Beer, LB
   Shane Bonham, DT
   Jocelyn Borgella, CB
   Eric Lynch, RB
   Van Malone, S
   Tony Semple, OL
   Mike Wells, DT
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (10)
   Chris Harrison, OL
   Johnny Johnson, QB
   Jeff Jones, OL
   Miles Macik, WR
   Derek Price, TE
   Ronald Rice, S
   Ron Rivers, RB
   Eric Stocz, TE
   Keith Washington, DE
   Richard Woodley, CB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Green Bay Packers
   
   Unrestricted free agents (11)
   Don Beebe, WR
   Gilbert Brown, DT
   Rob Carpenter, WR
   Jeff Dellenbach, OL
   Desmond Howard, WR
   Chris Jacke, K
   Dwight Jones, DE
   Doug Pederson, QB
   Mike Prior, S
   Wayne Simmons, LB
   Frank Winters, OL
   
   Option Free Agents (2)
   Eric Matthews, WR
   Bill Schroeder, WR
   
   Restricted free agents (6)
   Gary Brown, OL
   Lamont Hollinquest, LB
   Calvin Jones, RB
   Dorsey Levens, RB
   Terry Mickens, WR
   Gabe Wilkins, DE
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (2)
   Matthew Dorsett, CB
   Robert Kuberski, DT
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Minnesota Vikings
   
   Unrestricted free agents (18)
   Jeff Brady, LB
   Richard Brown, LB
   Scott Dill, OL
   Charles Evans, RB
   David Frisch, TE
   John Gerak, OL
   Robert Goff, DE
   Scottie Graham, RB
   Martin Harrison, DE
   Leroy Hoard, RB
   Qadry Ismail, WR
   Alfred Jackson, CB
   Amp Lee, RB
   Randall McDaniel, OL
   Robert Smith, RB
   Ariel Solomon, OL
   Darryl Talley, LB
   Sean Vanhorse, CB
   
   Restricted free agents (6)
   David Dixon, OL
   Dave Garnett, LB
   Robert Griffith, S
   David Palmer, WR
   Anthony Prior, CB
   Fernando Smith, DE
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (8)
   Pete Bercich, LB
   Mitch Berger, P
   Greg DeLong, TE
   Ben Hanks, LB
   Chris Johnson, CB
   Scott Sisson, K
   James Stewart, RB
   Jay Walker, QB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   New Orleans Saints
   
   Unrestricted free agents (9)
   Derek Brown, RB
   Paul Green, TE
   Richard Harvey, LB
   Tyrone Hughes, CB
   Greg Jackson, S
   Ed King, OL
   Sean Lumpkin, S
   Lorenzo Neal, RB
   Klaus Wilmsmeyer, P
   
   Restricted free agents (9)
   Mario Bates, RB
   Doug Brien, K
   Ernest Dixon, LB
   Brian Jones, LB
   Craig Novitsky, OL
   Doug Nussmeier, QB
   Steve Rhem, WR
   Austin Robbins, DT
   Winfred Tubbs, LB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (6)
   Israel Byrd, CB
   Don Davis, LB
   Michael Davis, RB
   Lee Deramus, WR
   Tony Johnson, TE
   William Strong, CB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   New York Giants
   
   Unrestricted free agents (9)
   Willie Beamon, CB
   Scott Davis, OL
   Lawrence Dawsey, WR
   Maurice Douglass, S
   Keith Hamilton, DT
   Arthur Marshall, WR
   Coleman Rudolph, DE
   Adam Schreiber, OL
   Lance Smith, OL
   
   Restricted free agents (8)
   Omar Douglas, WR
   Gary Downs, RB
   Keith Elias, RB
   Brian Kozlowski, TE
   Jerry Reynolds, OL
   Jason Sehorn, CB
   Stan White, QB
   Tito Wooten, S
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (8)
   Kevin Alexander, WR
   Jamal Duff, DE
   Percy Ellsworth, S
   Darnell Gilliard, DT
   Bernard Holsey, DE
   Ramon Okoli, DT
   Brian Saxton, TE
   Robert Walker, RB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Philadelphia Eagles
   
   Unrestricted free agents (15)
   Deral Boykin, S
   Darion Conner, LB
   William Fuller, DE
   Lester Holmes, OL
   Mark Ingram, WR
   Jimmie Johnson, TE
   Joseph Kelly, LB
   Guy McIntyre, OL
   Raleigh McKenzie, OL
   Mark Rypien, QB
   Mark Seay, WR
   Johnny Thomas, CB
   Adam Walker, RB
   Ed West, TE
   Calvin Williams, WR
   
   Restricted free agents (6)
   Terry Crews, DE
   Ronnie Dixon, DT
   James Fuller, S
   Charlie Garner, RB
   Joe Panos, OL
   Marc Woodard, LB
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (6)
   Michael Samson, DT
   Freddie Solomon, WR
   Hollis Thomas, DT
   Morris Unutoa, OL
   Derrick Witherspoon, RB
   Sylvester Wright, DE
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   St. Louis Rams
   
   Unrestricted free agents (11)
   Chuck Belin, OL
   Torin Dorn, S
   Cedric Figaro, LB
   Leo Goeas, OL
   Antonio Goss, LB
   Harold Green, RB
   James Harris, DE
   Thomas Homco, LB
   Chip Lohmiller, K
   Greg Robinson, RB
   Steve Walsh, QB
   
   Restricted free agents (2)
   Keith Crawford, CB
   Keith Lyle, S
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (8)
   Paschall Davis, LB
   Mike Gruttadauria, OL
   Carlos Huerta, K
   Jon Kirksey, DT
   Herman O'Berry, CB
   Troy Ridgley, DT
   Jermaine Ross, WR
   Billy Williams, WR
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   San Francisco 49ers
   
   Unrestricted free agents (10)
   Dennis Brown, DE
   Chris Dalman, OL
   Derrick Deese, OL
   Elvis Grbac, QB
   Steve Israel, CB
   Rod Milstead, OL
   Frank Pollack, OL
   Nate Singleton, WR
   Frankie Smith, CB
   Steve Wallace, OL
   
   Restricted free agents (6)
   Tyronne Drakeford, CB
   Anthony Lynn, RB
   Kevin Mitchell, LB
   Tony Peterson, LB
   Ted Popson, TE
   Jeff Wilkins, K
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (6)
   Daved Benefield, LB
   Jeff Brohm, QB
   Junior Bryant, DT
   Mike Caldwell, WR
   Tim Hanshaw, OL
   Mike Salmon, S
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Tampa Bay Buccaneers
   
   Unrestricted free agents (9)
   Ian Beckles, OL
   Demetrius Dubose, LB
   Paul Gruber, OL
   Courtney Hawkins, WR
   Tyrone Legette, CB
   Lonnie Marts, LB
   Martin Mayhew, CB
   Dave Moore, RB
   Casey Weldon, QB
   
   Restricted free agents (1)
   Jim Pyne, OL
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (2)
   Tony Bouie, S
   Jerry Ellison, RB
   _________________________________________________________________
   
   Washington Redskins
   
   Unrestricted free agents (13)
   Terry Allen, RB
   Flipper Anderson, WR
   Darryl Ashmore, OL
   William Brooks, WR
   Darrick Brownlow, LB
   Sean Gilbert, DT
   Darrell Green, CB
   James Jenkins, TE
   Trevor Matich, OL
   Keith Taylor, S
   Jeff Uhlenhake, OL
   Matt Vanderbeek, LB
   Stanley Woods, DE
   
   Transition free agents (1)
   Tom Carter, CB
   
   Restricted free agents (7)
   Romeo Bandison, DT
   William Bell, RB
   Gus Frerotte, QB
   William Gaines, DT
   Trent Green, QB
   Darryl Morrison, S
   Joe Patton, OL
   
   Exclusive rights free agents (9)
   Patrise Alexander, LB
   Tomur Barnes, CB
   Troy Barnett, DE
   Scott Blanton, K
   Alcides Catanho, LB
   Ryan Kuehl, DT
   Shar Pourdanesh, OL
   Matt Reem, OL
   Matt Turk, P
9.4997cap going up 700KHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownWed Feb 12 1997 16:4418
  League reportedly to raise salary cap $700,000

   The NFL salary cap will increase $700,000 to $41.4 million per team
   when official figures are released by the league on Wednesday. An
   unidentified source close to the NFL said that the amount for 1997 has
   been computed. The increase is small but larger than the $200,000 per
   team reported last week. The salary cap is the amount each NFL team is
   permitted to spend on salaries and pro-rated bonuses for the entire
   season. Most NFL player contracts are not guaranteed but signing
   bonuses are included in the amount that counts against the cap. The
   NFL has a hard cap, which means teams cannot go over the amount to
   re-sign its own players or circumvent it with any sort of exceptions,
   such as those in the salary cap used by the NBA. The initial report of
   $200,000 was less than the minimum salary for free agents with five
   years experience ($275,000). With an increase of $700,000, teams would
   be able to sign two five-year free agents.
  
9.499897 NFL ScheduleHBAHBA::HAASangel trumpets and devil trombonesFri Mar 28 1997 16:08339
   
Complete 1997 NFL schedule (All times ET)

   Week 1
   Sunday, Aug. 31
   Arizona at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
   Atlanta at Detroit, 1 p.m.
   Dallas at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
   Indianapolis at Miami, 1 p.m.
   Minnesota at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
   New Orleans at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
   Oakland at Houston, 1 p.m.
   Philadelphia at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
   San Diego at New England, 1 p.m.
   Jacksonville at Baltimore, 4 p.m.
   Kansas City at Denver, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Jets at Seattle, 4 p.m.
   San Francisco at Tampa Bay, 4 p.m.
   Washington at Carolina, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Sept. 1 
   Chicago at Green Bay, 9 p.m.
   
   Week 2
   Sunday, Sept. 7
   Buffalo at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
   Carolina at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
   Cincinnati at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
   Houston at Miami, 1 p.m.
   Minnesota at Chicago, 1 p.m.
   New England at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
   San Diego at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
   San Francisco at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
   Tampa Bay at Detroit, 1 p.m.
   Washington at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
   Denver at Seattle, 4 p.m.
   Green Bay at Philadelphia, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Giants at Jacksonville, 4 p.m.
   Dallas at Arizona, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Sept. 8
   Kansas City at Oakland, 9 p.m.
   
   Week 3
   Sunday, Sept. 14 
   Arizona at Washington, 1 p.m.
   Baltimore at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
   Buffalo at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
   Detroit at Chicago, 1 p.m.
   Miami at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
   Oakland at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
   Tampa Bay at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
   Carolina at San Diego, 4 p.m.
   New Orleans at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
   St. Louis at Denver, 4 p.m.
   Seattle at Indianapolis, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Jets at New England, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Sept. 15
   Philadelphia at Dallas, 9 p.m.
   (Open dates: Cincinnati, Houston, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh)
   
   Week 4
   Sunday, Sept. 21
   Baltimore at Houston, 1 p.m.
   Chicago at New England, 1 p.m.
   Detroit at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
   Kansas City at Carolina, 1 p.m.
   Minnesota at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
   Oakland at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
   Atlanta at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
   Cincinnati at Denver, 4 p.m.
   Indianapolis at Buffalo, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Giants at St. Louis, 4 p.m.
   San Diego at Seattle, 4 p.m.
   Miami at Tampa Bay, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Sept. 22
   Pittsburgh at Jacksonville, 9 p.m.
   (Open dates: Arizona, Dallas, Philadelphia, Washington)
   
   Week 5
   Sunday, Sept. 28
   Arizona at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
   Denver at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
   Green Bay at Detroit, 1 p.m.
   Houston at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
   Jacksonville at Washington, 1 p.m.
   New Orleans at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
   Baltimore at San Diego, 4 p.m.
   Chicago at Dallas, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Jets at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
   St. Louis at Oakland, 4 p.m.
   Seattle at Kansas City, 4 p.m.
   Philadelphia at Minnesota, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Sept. 29 
   San Francisco at Carolina, 9 p.m.
   (Open dates: Buffalo, Indiananapolis, Miami, New England)
   
   Week 6
   Sunday, Oct. 5 
   Cincinnati at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
   Dallas at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
   Detroit at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
   Kansas City at Miami, 1 p.m.
   Pittsburgh at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
   Tampa Bay at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
   Washington at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
   Houston at Seattle, 4 p.m.
   Minnesota at Arizona, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Jets at Indianapolis, 4 p.m.
   San Diego at Oakland, 4 p.m.
   New Orleans at Chicago, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Oct. 6 
   New England at Denver, 9 p.m.
   (Open dates: Atlanta, Carolina, St. Louis, San Francisco)
   
   Week 7 
   Sunday, Oct. 12 
   Atlanta at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
   Buffalo at New England, 1 p.m.
   Cincinnati at Houston, 1 p.m.
   Detroit at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
   Green Bay at Chicago, 1 p.m.
   Miami at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
   Philadelphia at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
   Carolina at Minnesota, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Giants at Arizona, 4 p.m.
   St. Louis at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
   Indianapolis at Pittsburgh, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Oct. 13 
   Dallas at Washington, 9 p.m.
   (Open dates: Baltimore, Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego, Seattle)
   
   Week 8 
   Thursday, Oct. 16 
   San Diego at Kansas City, 8 p.m.
   Sunday, Oct. 19 
   Arizona at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
   Carolina at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
   Jacksonville at Dallas, 1 p.m.
   New England at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
   San Francisco at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
   Seattle at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
   Washington at Houston, 1 p.m.
   Denver at Oakland, 4 p.m.
   Miami at Baltimore, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Giants at Detroit, 4 p.m.
   Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
   Monday, Oct. 20 
   Buffalo at Indianapolis, 9 p.m.
   (Open dates: Chicago, Green Bay, Minnesota, Tampa Bay)
   
   Week 9 
   Sunday, Oct. 26 
   Baltimore at Washington, 1 p.m.
   Cincinnati at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
   Dallas at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
   Denver at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
   Kansas City at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
   Minnesota at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
   San Francisco at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
   Chicago at Miami, 4 p.m.
   Houston at Arizona, 4 p.m.
   Indianapolis at San Diego, 4 p.m.
   Jacksonville at Pittsburgh, 4 p.m.
   Oakland at Seattle, 4 p.m.
   Atlanta at Carolina, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Oct. 27 
   Green Bay at New England, 9 p.m.
   (Open dates: Detroit, N.Y. Jets)
   
   Week 10 
   Sunday, Nov. 2 
   Baltimore at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
   Miami at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
   New England at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
   Oakland at Carolina, 1 p.m.
   St. Louis at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
   San Diego at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
   Tampa Bay at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
   Washington at Chicago, 1 p.m.
   Dallas at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
   Jacksonville at Houston, 4 p.m.
   Philadelphia at Arizona, 4 p.m.
   Seattle at Denver, 4 p.m.
   Detroit at Green Bay, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Nov. 3 
   Pittsburgh at Kanasas City, 9 p.m.
   (Open dates: New Orleans, N.Y. Giants)
   
   Week 11 
   Sunday, Nov. 9 
   Arizona at Dallas, 1 p.m.
   Chicago at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
   Cincinnati at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
   Detroit at Washington, 1 p.m.
   Kansas City at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
   N.Y. Jets at Miami, 1 p.m.
   St. Louis at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
   Tampa Bay at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
   Carolina at Denver, 4 p.m.
   New England at Buffalo, 4 p.m.
   New Orleans at Oakland, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Giants at Houston, 4 p.m.
   Seattle at San Diego, 4 p.m.
   Baltimore at Pittsburgh, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Nov. 10 
   San Francisco at Philadelphia, 9 p.m.
   
   Week 12 
   Sunday, Nov. 16 
   Arizona at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
   Atlanta at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
   Cincinnati at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
   Denver at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
   Green Bay at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
   Houston at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
   Minnesota at Detroit, 1 p.m.
   New England at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
   Philadelphia at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
   Seattle at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
   Washington at Dallas, 1 p.m.
   Carolina at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Jets at Chicago, 4 p.m.
   Oakland at San Diego, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Nov. 17 
   Buffalo at Miami, 9 p.m.
   
   Week 13 
   Sunday, Nov. 23
   Arizona at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
   Buffalo at Houston, 1 p.m.
   Dallas at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
   Indianapolis at Detroit, 1 p.m.
   Miami at New England, 1 p.m.
   Minnesota at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
   New Orleans at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
   Pittsburgh at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
   Tampa Bay at Chicago, 1 p.m.
   Carolina at St. Louis, 4 p.m.
   Jacksonville at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
   Kansas City at Seattle, 4 p.m.
   San Diego at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Giants at Washington, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Nov. 24 
   Oakland at Denver, 9 p.m.
   
   Week 14 
   Thursday, Nov. 27 
   Chicago at Detroit, 12:30 p.m.
   Houston at Dallas, 4 p.m.
   Sunday, Nov. 30 
   Baltimore at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
   Cincinnati at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
   Indianapolis at New England, 1 p.m.
   New Orleans at Carolina, 1 p.m.
   N.Y. Jets at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
   St. Louis at Washington, 1 p.m.
   San Francisco at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
   Atlanta at Seattle, 4 p.m.
   Miami at Oakland, 4 p.m.
   Pittsburgh at Arizona, 4 p.m.
   Tampa Bay at N.Y. Giants, 4 p.m.
   Denver at San Diego, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Dec. 1 
   Green Bay at Minnesota, 9 p.m.
   
   Week 15 
   Thursday, Dec. 4 
   Houston at Cincinnati, 8 p.m.
   Sunday, Dec. 7 
   Buffalo at Chicago, 1 p.m.
   Denver at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
   Green Bay at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
   New England at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
   N.Y. Giants at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
   Oakland at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
   St. Louis at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
   Seattle at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
   Atlanta at San Diego, 4 p.m.
   Indianapolis at N.Y. Jets, 4 p.m.
   Minnesota at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
   Washington at Arizona, 4 p.m.
   Detroit at Miami, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Dec. 8 
   Carolina at Dallas, 9 p.m.
   
   Week 16 
   Saturday, Dec. 13 
   Washington at N.Y. Giants, 12:30 p.m.
   Pittsburgh at New England, 4 p.m.
   Sunday, Dec. 14 
   Dallas at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
   Detroit at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
   Houston at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
   Jacksonville at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
   Miami at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
   Philadelphia at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
   Tampa Bay at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
   Arizona at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
   Green Bay at Carolina, 4 p.m.
   Kansas City at San Diego, 4 p.m.
   Seattle at Oakland, 4 p.m.
   Chicago at St. Louis, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Dec. 15 
   Denver at San Francisco, 9 p.m.
   
   Week 17 
   Saturday, Dec. 20 
   Buffalo at Green Bay, 12:30 p.m.
   St. Louis at Carolina, 4 p.m.
   Sunday, Dec. 21 
   Baltimore at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
   Chicago at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
   Indianapolis at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
   New Orleans at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
   N.Y. Giants at Dallas, 1 p.m.
   Philadelphia at Washington, 1 p.m.
   Pittsburgh at Houston, 1 p.m.
   Atlanta at Arizona, 4 p.m.
   Jacksonville at Oakland, 4 p.m.
   N.Y. Jets at Detroit, 4 p.m.
   San Diego at Denver, 4 p.m.
   San Francisco at Seattle, 8 p.m.
   Monday, Dec. 22 
   New England at Miami, 9 p.m.

   Postseason
   Saturday, Sunday, Dec. 27-28
   Wild-card games

   Saturday, Sunday, Jan. 3-4
   Divisional playoffs

   Sunday, Jan. 11
   AFC and NFC championships

   Sunday, Jan. 25
   Super Bowl XXXII, Jack Murphy Stadium, San Diego

   Sunday, Feb. 1
   AFC-NFC Pro Bowl, Honolulu