[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hbahba::cam_sports

Title:Sports 93-96 Archive. No new notes allowed
Notice:Chainsaw's last standSPORTS_97
Moderator:HBAHBA::HAAS
Created:Mon Jan 11 1993
Last Modified:Tue Apr 15 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:302
Total number of notes:117855

110.0. "Official Boston Celtics Note" by MSBCS::BRYDIE (The Peter Principle in action) Fri Apr 30 1993 13:09

    
     This is the "official" Boston Celtics note.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
110.1WRITE LOCKEDCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeFri Apr 30 1993 13:191
    
110.2ROYALT::ASHEOwner 92-93 DEChoop & FBA champsFri Apr 30 1993 14:343
    I miss Hank Finkel.
    
    What's the scoop on Reggie...
110.3MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Peter Principle in actionFri Apr 30 1993 14:428
      Kev, what with the Big Apple not having an NBA champion
     in 20 years I would think that you x-planted New Yorkers 
     would be the most appreciative of the success and class of 
     the NBA's most storied team not to mention their fans. You 
     know a, "that's what I want to be when I grow up" type of 
     thing. 
    
110.4MKFSA::LONGIf you get there before I doFri Apr 30 1993 14:435
	Heard on the new this a.m. that Reggie is undergoing extensive tests
	at a Boston hospital.  MacDaniel certainly was a force last night.


	billl
110.5Retire Hank FInkel's number...TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is crawling!!!Fri Apr 30 1993 14:4415
110.6MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Peter Principle in actionFri Apr 30 1993 14:459
    
    >> I miss Hank Finkel.
    
       I miss Terry Duerod.
    
    >> What's the scoop on Reggie...
    
       Word on the radio this morning was that he was suffering from a 
       "glucose deficiency" and he could/should be back for Game 2.
110.7ROYALT::ASHEOwner 92-93 DEChoop & FBA champsFri Apr 30 1993 15:362
    Duerod's best days were with the Pistons...
    
110.8the Boston Suns, er CelticsFRETZ::HEISERdebt freeFri Apr 30 1993 17:266
    Glad to hear Reggie is okay.  I loved X's comment: "My eyes lit up when
    I saw they were playing me one-on-one."  Why can't Phoenix get guys
    like X?
    
    I wish Ed Pinckney could return.  I think they'll go farther with him
    in the lineup.  Why can't Phoenix get guys like Ed? 
110.9AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Apr 30 1993 17:304
    	Real smart move by the Celtics putting Reggie back in the game
    when they didn't even know what the heck was wrong with him.
    
    				/Don
110.10CTHQ::LEARYI don't do ND spandexFri Apr 30 1993 19:0432
    Gawd I hope Reggie Ok. The hail with Bball, every time I've seen the
    man on TV opr heard him interviewed, he exudes class. And what you said
    /er.
    
    I miss Hambone Williams and Rich Johnson.
    
    Why Hambone?? Loved them muttonchops and he helped the Celts to the
    champenship in Russell's last year.
    
    Why Johnson? Wail Rich was the backup to the backup C if'n ya catch my
    drift in the early 70's ( 69 or 70). Twas the crowd fav.. even tho he
    couldn't do much, he gave it his all. This was back in them days of the
    doubleheader at the Garden where a kid could spend a coupla clams
    and sneak into the great seats. Wail, me and me HS buddies went to
    a Celt game in '70 I believe, paid the standing room price ( mebbe $2)
    and snuck down somewhere behind the C's bench as they musta had a
    whopping crowd of 2G.
    
    Well about this time, po' Rich had been picked up by Boston's finest
    for suspected passing of counterfeit bills. Case was still under
    investigation and po' Rich was still carryin' the label. Well during
    A C's timeout, Rich was whar a backup to a backup should be... way in
    the back of the huddle, looking up at the crowd and paying no mind to
    the coach's instructions. Well we were purty close, and all of a
    sudden, we hear this booming voice a section behind us.. "HEY RICH!"
    Ol' Rich looks up in the general vicinty of the shout. The main
    continues, " GOT CHANGE FOR A TEN?". Well if looks could kill man Rich
    woulda vaporized this guy on the spot. We was howlin'. And from that
    moment on, I always wonder what happened to Rich Johnson.
    
    MikeL
    
110.11APPLE::FRANCUSABPSun May 02 1993 00:526
    re: .9
    
    And this complaint from a guy who believes in blood and guts hockey :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.12SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindMon May 03 1993 10:5415
    Today's news on Reggie Lewis is NOT good.  He has a heart condition,
    and will not play any more this year.  No word yet on if this is a
    career-ending condition, or life-threatening.  As NBA basketball is
    such a strenuous endeavor, it could well turn out that his career is
    over, but that he could lead an active and productive life.
    
    Reggie has NEVER shown signs of being a fathead.  Whatever he's like in
    private isn't known to me, but publicly he certainly is a class act. 
    For a guy to go from a non-basketball factory University to the NBA
    isn't what you'd call expected.  To then become one of the better
    players and end up as team captain is quite an accomplishment.
    
    I'm pulling for him, and am hoping that it is a temporary situation.
    
    Lee
110.13ROYALT::ASHEOwner 92-93 DEChoop & FBA champsMon May 03 1993 13:387
    Sounds like it's probably not a temporary condition, but not
    life-threatening.  He's in for second opinions.  Write him
    off for the rest of the playoffs though.  Hope he gets well
    soon.
    
    Also hope that IF the Hornets beat the Celtics, that this isn't
    used as an excuse. 
110.14Other than McHale's exit, what are they playing for anyway?NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon May 03 1993 13:4713
    > Also hope that IF the Hornets beat the Celtics, that this isn't
    > used as an excuse. 
     
    Who cares?
    
    I thought the Hornets would beat the Celts going in, straight up, but 
    it's not as if losing your best player isn't going to matter.  Not to 
    mention losing him in this fashion, where basketball becomes secondary 
    in everyone's minds...
    
    glenn
    
110.15ROYALT::ASHEOwner 92-93 DEChoop & FBA champsMon May 03 1993 15:121
    Because the Hornets will have deserved it, that's all.
110.16Here's hoping Reggie is going to be okayAXIS::ROBICHAUDMon May 03 1993 15:151
    
110.17VIA::COHENMon May 03 1993 15:506
    
    Fortunately they caught it in time.  As far as the Celtics go, a very
    gutsy performance, too bad they lost.  It marred Kevin's stellar 
    performance.  I would have said this was the best series of the first
    round, but I'm afraid the Lakers are doing that.  Boy, could THAT be
    a gag of monumental proportions!!!
110.18TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is crawling!!!Tue May 04 1993 14:2815
Hearing all about Reggie Lewis, his condition, etc, these days.

Seems Reggie apparently was unhapy with the treatment he was receiving at New 
England Baptist Hospital, under the auspeces of the Celtics.  He checked himself 
out, went to Brigham and Womens (across the street), and checked in there for
another evaluation.  Anyone have any more info on this?  If he plays again, or
doesn't play again, it cast a bitter shadow on the whole affair.

The front page story in the Boston Globe today indicates that Lewis will likely
not play again, while the team physician backed off from that in other forums.

As for on the court, the Celtics looked very very slow, and made many too many 
mistakes lasted night.  It would take 180 degree turn around for them not to
be eliminated tomorrow night.

110.19Completely overmatched on the roadNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue May 04 1993 14:4114
    
    For several years now, no matter who they've been playing, Indiana,
    Atlanta, Cleveland, whoever, the Celtics have been bigtime dogs on the
    road in the playoffs.  They barely hang in there at home in the close
    games, then get annihilated on the road.  This is not a good formula.
    I keep hearing and seeing on the radio and in the papers predictions
    that the Celtics should be able to win one of these two games in
    Charlotte to force Game 5.  Even if they'd had Reggie Lewis, I'd say 
    forget it, not gonna happen (of course they'd probably have been able 
    to squeak out Game 2, and then been able to play another tight one in
    Game 5).
    
    glenn 
    
110.20disappointingFRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyTue May 04 1993 16:477
    This is really sad.  Does anyone know why stuff like this didn't show
    up until after he's been playing hoops 12+ years?  
    
    Losing Bias and Larry was bad enough.  The C's are in trouble with no
    all-star caliber go-to guy.
    
    Mike
110.21AXIS::ROBICHAUDTue May 04 1993 16:529
    	Glenn, the Celtics will have to bet worse before they get better.
    With Reggie's career in jeapordy it could happen real soon.  It'll
    be kind of hard to justify $50.00 seats if the team wins 20 games.
    With regards to Reggie checking into Brigham and Womens it's only
    natural to want a second opinion on a life threatening disease.
    But it's certainly sad to see the front office finger pointing with
    regards to why they let Reggie play after collapsing on the court.
    
    				/Don
110.22MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Peter Principle in actionTue May 04 1993 16:565
    
      /Don, I think you were absolutely right when you said it was
     stupid of the Celtics to put Reggie back in the game when they
     weren't sure of what was wrong with him. Reggie apparently thought
     so too because that was a factor in his seeking a second opinion.
110.23CAMONE::WAYAre you Master of your domain?Tue May 04 1993 17:057
Well, look at the late Pistol Pete.   His condition never showed itself
until he dropped dead.

Good for Reggie that at least they found it....


'Saw
110.24SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindTue May 04 1993 17:1718
    I'm not a doctor, but I played one when I was 4...
    
    In an interview with one of the doctors who had examined him, it seems
    his condition is one which may be congenital, or picked up from a
    virus, or possibly from a deficiency of vitamins.  The true of the
    matter is, they don't really know why Reggie has it.
    
    Beyond that, this condition causes a thickening of the heart tissue,
    which in turn reduces the amount of blood pumped per cycle.  Therefore,
    when exercising, the heart must complete more pumping cycles to provide
    the same amout of blood it would have if the condition didn't exist.
    
    Now, I heard a radio report this AM that one of the doctors of the new
    team stated that Reggie MAY be able to return next year, depending on
    the success of the treatment.  I didn't see or hear of any mention of
    treatment, prior to hearing that.
    
    Lee
110.25I'm an engineer. Get me inside and I'll tell you the problem.DECWET::METZGERImagine your logo here.Tue May 04 1993 20:4415
Thanks for the info Lee. I was wondering about potential treatment and if the
doctors can be positive about anything unless they go for a look.

There is much about the human body that is unknown and too many doctors making
100% diagnoses with minimul information. 

I'd want a second and third and fourth opinion on a diagnosis like this. 

However if there was any doubt about being able to play, I'd sit if I was reggie.


Life is too short to play russian roulette,

Metz
110.26CAMONE::WAYGlamour!?!?!?Wed May 05 1993 13:5715
>There is much about the human body that is unknown and too many doctors making
>100% diagnoses with minimul information. 

There's a lot of good docs out there, but as my brother said, there's also
a lot who only got C's in medical school.....


>Life is too short to play russian roulette,

Quite a philosophical question though -- die young doing what you wanna
do, or live a long life having to give up your dream.   'Tis a choice
I'd not want to make.....


'Saw
110.27TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is crawling!!!Wed May 05 1993 14:096
110.28CAMONE::WAYGlamour!?!?!?Wed May 05 1993 14:194
>Easy choice when you have a family (Reggie Lewis does).


Oh, I wasn't aware of that.   That does make it tougher, I guess....
110.29TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is crawling!!!Wed May 05 1993 15:0710
110.30Reggie Lewis: excellent bball player, better personTNPUBS::NAZZAROBoston Shootout - June 18,19,20!Wed May 05 1993 15:1920
    He has a young son, just over a year old.
    
    I've known Reggie Lewis since his freshman year at Northeastern, and
    he is one of the nicest, most unassuming, non-egotistical people I've
    ever met in sports.  He is shy, but always friendly, and does more
    work in the community than any other person on any pro sports team 
    in Boston, almost all of it unpublicized.
    
    The last noter was correct in stating that the main reason for
    switching hospitals was the exclusion of him and his wife from
    the discussions of his condition.  This attitude that Reggie is
    an employee and the Celtics will notify him when a dscision is
    made about his life is why Reggie left the Baptist Hospital to enroll
    at Brigham and Women's.  More than a second opinion, Reggie wanted
    to be the one in charge of his care.  Not that there was anything
    wrong with the care he was receiving at the first hospital.  Reggie
    stressed that was not the case; it was that he just felt he should 
    be the one calling the shots.
    
    NAZZ  
110.31TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is crawling!!!Wed May 05 1993 15:3811
110.32Was it Snuffy's curse last night?AKOCOA::BREENOr so the sages speakThu May 06 1993 18:1638
    
    Well, with the Celtics trailing in double figures thruout most of the
    game last night, which I was watching on espn - can't stand listening
    to Cousy - I barely heard mention that Dean "Snuffy" Smith was in
    attendance along with a brief reference to NC alum Rick Fox.
    
    And then came the rally and there was Fox in the back court smartly
    calling time - why couldn't I see that dagger poised in the hand of
    Snuffy's ghost.
    
    And then, 10 second violation - Rick Fox gags one for the Snuffer,
    highest tribute an ol Tarheel can give to his coach.
    
    So I had to look up Frank's tribute to Snuffy, untitled but could be
    "Snuffy takes the Pipe".  Here are a few stanzas
    
    <Because the crowd was cognizant, they knew one joyous fact,
    <They'd seen it time and time again, they'd seen old Snuffy's act.
    .
    <There was ease in UCONN's manner, as they returned from their time out
    <They knew the chances were so great that Snuffy would bow out.
    <For Jim Calhoun had told them, Snuffy's an ordinary bloke,
    <But here in this here "champeenship" we can count on him to choke.
    
    <Ten thousand eyes were on Snuff, as he double checked his System,
    <Rick Fox was two for twenty, but the Snuffer wouldn't yank 'im.
    .
    .
    <Rick Fox was the man said the System, and Snuffy's heart strings sang,
    <but then Fox put the ball up, and it rebounded with a mightly clang.
    
    Or
    
    When Ford asked the hapless Fox, why 
    the 10 second clock did you not heed?
    "I saw ol Snuf and just assummed,
    I'd get all the time I'd need."
    
110.33PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu May 06 1993 18:447
110.343335::francusABPThu May 06 1993 19:4312
Can someone post the last few possessions of yesterdays game?

Douglas steals the ball, scores, Celtics lead 103-102

Fill in the blanks


Mourning scores, Hornets lead 104-103
Browns tip is blocked - game over.

The Crazy Met
110.35PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu May 06 1993 20:019
    TCM, it went something like this.
    
    Hornets bring the ball back up court down by a point.  Hornets put up
    the shot, it hits the rim.  Parish gets the rebound, finally gets the
    ball to Fox who calls timeout.  Celts inbound the ball to Fox, but Fox
    can't get across halfcourt in time.  Turnover, Hornets get the ball,
    put up the shot.  Shot is rejected by McHale but ball is ruled OB, off
    the Celts.  Hornets inbound, get it to Mourning at the top of the key
    and SWISH.
110.36another great one will be missedFRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyThu May 06 1993 20:3853
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (BRUCE MARTIN)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.basketball
Subject: Celtics' McHale retires

	CHARLOTTE, N.C. (UPI) -- Ending a season of speculation, Kevin McHale
announced his retirement from the Boston Celtics Wednesday night
following his club's 104-103 playoff loss to the Charlotte Hornets.
	McHale, one of the Celtics all-time greats, ended a 13-year NBA
career by scoring 19 points off the bench. The Hornets eliminated the
Celtics, 3-1, in their first-round playoff series.
	``I made this decision earlier this season, when I had lost any kind
of mental edge throughout the regular season,'' he said. ``It was really
frustrating. You can be physically impaired a little bit, but you can be
mentally strong. You can go out there and compete. I really lost it
mentally.
	``There is always something that separates the really good players
from the average players, and I lost it. It took me until a couple of
weeks ago to find it again and I have to admit, I was very proud fo the
way I played in the playoffs.''
	McHale was the third pick in the 1980 NBA draft with a selection
acquired from Golden State, along with Robert Parish, in one of the most
lopsided trades ever made. The Celtics traded two first-round draft
picks, which turned out to be Joe Barry Carroll and Rickey Brown.
	McHale teamed up with Larry Bird and Parish to lead the Celtics to
NBA titles in 1981, '84 and '86.
	``I had come to this conclusion last fall,'' McHale said. ``I was
ready to quit. I told my wife and kids I was done playing. I was hurt at
the time, my ankle was bothering me. My two boys wanted me to play
because they wanted to be ballboys and they loved the guys on the team.
	``I geared it up one more time for Mike and Joe.''
	McHale said the future is open for his next career.
	``I have a lot of plans, but until anything is written in stone, I'm
not going to say anything,'' said the former University of Minnesota
star. ``It will keep me busy, but there will never, ever be anything
like playing basketball for the Boston Celtics -- that I can guarantee
you.
	``It was a once in a lifetime deal. I'm as proud of anything of
staying with that franchise for 13 years. The teammates I went through
and had fun with are special.''
	At the end of the game, which knocked the Celtics from the playoffs,
Hornets reserve center Mike Gminski came up to McHale and hugged him
while the veteran Boston forward fought back tears.
	``I've know Mike for a long time,'' McHale said. ``That was real
nice. Mike got me all choked up...It was really nice for Mike to come
over and take a minute to say, 'Nice, career.' It made me feel really
good.''
	When informed of McHale's announcement, Hornets star Larry Johnson
said: ``Let him retire, but tell him to give me the book with all his
moves and let me perfect all of those moves. Kevin had a great, great
career. He is one of the pioneers of this league and I think he went out
a champion.
	``I wish I knew he was going to retire because I would have gone up
and hugged him, too.''
110.37AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu May 06 1993 21:153
    	'Snuffy would've been proud of Brick's performance lasted night.
    
    				/Don
110.38PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri May 07 1993 18:282
    With Reggie's health in question, I'm surprised to hear that Dee is
    available.
110.39AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri May 07 1993 19:265
    	I wouldn't trade him.  He's coming off a bad year and he still
    has potential.  I would sign Chief and lay off this year's lousy
    free agent crop.  Next year some premier players could be available.
    
    				/Don
110.40real fans to reclaim garden next year...CNTROL::CHILDSThe idea that nothing matters...Fri May 07 1993 19:469
 I haven't seen too many weakness in Danny Manning's game other than his own
 mind.....Dee Brown I'm afraid Slasher will never be any more than potential
 untapped. Sort of the Irving Fryar of the Celtics. If Gamble could learn
 some defense and how to move without the ball better....

 alls I know is next year we get to take the LOGES and PROMENADES back!!!!

 mike
110.41And then there was FenwayNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri May 07 1993 20:019
    
 > alls I know is next year we get to take the LOGES and PROMENADES back!!!!
    
    Fear not, the Delaware North Inc. Sports Complex (i.e. the New Garden)
    is on its way, and win or lose it'll be jam-packed with FauxFans well
    into the next century.  Enjoy the reprieve while it lasts...
    
    glenn
    
110.42AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri May 07 1993 20:047
    	MikeC, Manning stinks as a defensive player and it's his feet
    not his mind that ain't quick enough.  At the prevailing prices
    we will not be able to take the Loges and Promenades back.  And
    if the fans do not want to pay $50.00 to see a 20-25 win team the
    owners will move the team to Tampa Bay.
    
    				/Don
110.43CNTROL::CHILDSThe idea that nothing matters...Fri May 07 1993 20:182
yeah but they won't be at the games so we'll be able to move down...
110.44;-)FRETZ::HEISERraise your voice in shouts of joyFri May 07 1993 20:443
    Phoenix already has Ainge.  Signing Parish (*UNRESTRICTED* free agent
    after June 1) would just be another building block in the conspiracy to
    lure Celtic magic here for the transplants to enjoy.
110.45Kevin Mchale should start his own big man camp...DECWET::METZGERImagine your logo here.Fri May 07 1993 20:5011
So the Celts are going to try and stave off lottery by going for quantity over
quality, eh? 

They should face the music..No matter how many Alaas, Bricks, Shermans
and Kliens they throw at the opposition, talent is what wins in the NBA and to
get talent you've got to tank it for 2 years and get 2 lottery picks.

You can't rebuild in the NBA via free agency the way you can in MLB. 

Metz
110.46FDCV06::KINGJessinator attacks Disney, film @11Sun May 09 1993 01:115
    Parish would fit these teams nicly nexted year..
    
    Bulls, Suns, Warriors, Sonics, Heat, Hawks, Jazz...
    
    REK
110.47Bill Walton HOF induction?AKOCOA::BREENOr so the sages speakMon May 10 1993 20:353
    I saw where Bill Walton will be inducted into the Hall of Fame but
    missed the date.  Anybody know when that's supposed to happen or did it
    already happen?
110.48WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MMR INFORMER..LICKY LICKY BOOM BOOM DOWNMon May 10 1993 20:373
    
    
    Today.
110.49MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Peter Principle in actionTue May 11 1993 16:064
    
      Yesterday, at a press conference, Reggie Lewis, flanked by his
     doctors, announced that he expects to return to play next year.
     Why, if it weren't for a cruel twist of fate...
110.50MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jun 30 1993 13:285
    
       Tonight's the NBA draft and if the 'Tics come out of this thing with
      either George Lynch or even Corey Blount I'll be happy. If they bring
      Luther Wright or Malcolm Mackey back with 'em, they deserve a good
      cuffing.
110.51Brick Fox NOT! CNTROL::CHILDSDeceptively old, almost matureWed Jun 30 1993 15:159
Associated Press says Ervin Johnson is the Celtics' man...namewise that's
a kick in the teeth. Luther needs a serious slap and some tutoring but
as a porject he might be worth a gamble. No just cause to draft Mackey
unless you want a player who can fold up like a cheap suit at times.
I like Lynch's game and I'd also like to see him in Green despite his
heritage.....

mike
110.52MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jun 30 1993 15:558
     Luther doesn't plasy with enough motivation for my liking. He's got 
    the body but I don't think you can teach intensity. Mackey showed me
    what he was made of in the ACC tourney. Fluff. Lynch, however, despite 
    his negatives (size, perimeter shooting) is a guy I just love. He plays
    aggressively, he plays intelligently and he plays 40 minutes of the game.
    Corey Blount is probaly a bit of aproject but *I* think he's a better
    risk than Wright.
110.53VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDImus is coming to BostonWed Jun 30 1993 16:145
    	I agree about Wright but wouldn't mind the C's taking a chance on
    Earvin "The Other" Johnson.  Lynch would be a good pickup because the
    X-Main doesn't impress on the defensive side.
    
    				/Don
110.54he can pass too...CNTROL::CHILDSDeceptively old, almost matureWed Jun 30 1993 16:4111
 Plus Lynch will get his boards. Just cause he 6'7" ain't going to stop
 him. How was Luther supposed to get motivated when his coach sat him at
 crucial times, and never real featured him in the offense? With Dehere,
 Karnivous and Walker needing shots as well Luther was on the short end of
 it. He's got a soft touch around the hoop, he can hook, he can rebound and
 block shots. He can get lost though at time if they could cure it then it
 looks like a win-situation to me...then again maybe it's just my NECCJ'in
 POPB'in of the Big East talkin'....

 mike
110.55For once Childs has it right. Lynch cain rebound.RHETT::KNORRDean &gt; WoodenWed Jun 30 1993 18:168
    The rumor mill has Lynch gone long before the C's get their pick. 
    Seems the Lakers have had so much success wif Carolina forwards that
    they're gonna snatch up George.
    
    The Dean factor, dontcha know.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
110.56DECWET::METZGERThis is the song that never ends.Wed Jun 30 1993 18:237
I thought the lakers had thier hearts set on another guard? I fergit the name
but all indications were pointing toward him...

I'm hoping Rex Walters stays around long enough for the Sonics to pick him.

Metz
110.57ROYALT::ASHESTOP! You're bendin' the shafts!!!Wed Jun 30 1993 18:261
    Lindsay Hunter?
110.58MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Jul 01 1993 13:125

   Well, the 'Tics drafted Acie Earl out of Iowa and I for one am ecstatic.
  With some work at Kevin McHale's big mans camp and under the tutelage of
  the Chief, old Acie could become a first class stiff. Yay.
110.59WREATH::DEVLINAgassi - the Hairless wonder...Thu Jul 01 1993 14:099
Not a Celts fain, but Acie Earl was one of my favorite college ball players.  I think
this is a great pick by the Celtics.  Boy, the East will be where the real men play
center over the next few years.  You still got Patrick, and the Shack, and Alonzo,
and now you got Bradley, Acie Earl, and the Bullets drafted a real project - a 7' 7"
guy from romania or somewhere....

Youwza!

JD
110.60:-)DUGROS::ROSSObjection orientedThu Jul 01 1993 14:421
Turn off the hype machine, JD.
110.61WREATH::DEVLINAgassi - the Hairless wonder...Thu Jul 01 1993 14:459
Sorry Doug, but spent the weekend in NY.  I'm just swimming in the type of
hype that Tommy and Glenn told me about.  Don't know if all the hype about
the Mets Tragic Number, the 1 sentence about the Knicks, or the 1/4 page
afforded the draft picks of the three NHL teams is what made me into a hype
machine...

;-)

JD
110.628^)CTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyThu Jul 01 1993 15:047
    Nuttin' to hype in NY either JD exceptin' the 17 pages dedicated to
    the Yanks in all papers.
    
    Wait till the Mutts win two in a row ( or have they?). 
    
    MikeL
    
110.63MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Jul 01 1993 15:073
 Hey JD, what the hell newspaper are you reading that only has a one page
 sports page?
110.64ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Thu Jul 01 1993 15:097
    re: .62
    
    Yup, last night the Mets won a 2nd game in a row. Of course
    they needed to play Florida to do it :-(
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.65WREATH::DEVLINAgassi - the Hairless wonder...Thu Jul 01 1993 15:198
Tommy -

Didn't have one page - just gave some examples of hype that I saw.  Read the
Daily News, the Post, the times and the Rocklan County Journal News...

Knicks did ask John Starks to bulk up in the off season.  What HYPE!

JD
110.66MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Jul 01 1993 15:273
   What do you expect them to hype? The last place Mets? The second place
   Yankees? All of the other teams that are off-season? Geesh!
110.67MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Jul 01 1993 15:526
  BTW - JD, if you read "Daily News, the Post, the times and the Rocklan 
        County Journal News" and all you got was "all the hype about the 
        Mets Tragic Number, the 1 sentence about the Knicks, or the 1/4 
        page afforded the draft picks of the three NHL teams" you might
        want to seriously consider picking up the Boston Globe next time
        you want to read a sports page while you're down there.
110.68If it's a no-go then it's on to Jersey to meet w/ The DonaldNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 01 1993 16:047
    
    So Steinbrenner waited till the week to sit down with Mario Cuomo and
    scheme about abandoning The House That Ruth Built.  In other words,
    The Idiot let you enjoy a peaceful weekend for a change...
    
    glenn
    
110.69Acie Earl is cool. He definitely doesn't suck.VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHappy 30th ZIPThu Jul 01 1993 16:261
    
110.70WREATH::DEVLINAgassi - the Hairless wonder...Thu Jul 01 1993 17:088
Tommy -

THere was lots of sports - but no hype.  I tried to find this awesome
N.Y. hype that folks from podunk towns keep telling me about, but that's
all I could find.  Oh yeah, they did hype Anthony Young's run at the 
loss record.

JD
110.71MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Jul 01 1993 17:152
  see .66
110.72The latest twist in the Reggie Lewis sagaTNPUBS::NAZZAROTake me for a little whileFri Jul 16 1993 13:1038
    Posted from the Celtics notesfile - thought people in here who don't
    have access to the Boston Globe would be interested in this.

    Amazing article in today's Globe by Jackie McMullin.  She goes in depth
    into why Reggie hasn't participated in any basketball workouts, and why
    the Celtics front office has seemed to back off from their support of
    him, since Dave Gavitt's big hug at the Dr. Mudge press conference.
    
    Jackie shows a lot of empathy for Reggie, saying how it makes sense
    that Reggie is struggling internally with the question of when he
    should begin full court workouts.  She noted that the whole basketball
    world is watching, waiting to see if you collapse again, and the
    pressure from that is immense.
    
    Then she pointedly asks, given this pressure, why is the team
    distancing itself from Reggie?  "It has become clear now that what
    Celtics officials have said publicly and how they are operating
    provately are two very different things." 
    
    Jackie wants to know why is the onus of his comeback squarely on his
    shoulders?  The answer, of course, is money.  The Celtics attorneys
    say that once Reggie switched doctors, he assumed liability for his
    condition.  However, a week after the Dr. Mudge press conference, Mudge
    and Lewis wanted to present the findings from Brigham and Women's to
    the physicians the Celtics assembled.  THE CELTICS REFUSED!!!!!!!!!!!!
    "Their attitude was - it's your doctor, your diagnosis!"
    
    Jackie asks:  "So, if the Celtics are not willing to accept liability,
    does that mean Lewis must report to training camp with his own
    physician?  His own trainer?  His own coach?  Let's say team officials
    ask Lewis to sign a waiver releasing them from liability.  Should he
    sign it?  If he doesn't, should the Celtics let him play?"
    
    A very interesting and thought-provoking article to a problem that
    continues to have no easy answers.
    
    NAZZ
    
110.73VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDRealStoriesOfTheAnimalRescueLeagueFri Jul 16 1993 15:578
    	But NAZZ, I can see the Celtics' point in this.  Their doctors said
    Reggie should not play basketball, then Reggie found a doctor who said
    he can.  Why assume responsibility for what could possibly be a tragedy
    when they've already forewarned him?  It's an ugly situation, but I
    don't think that the Celtics' management are the only bad guys in this. 
    If they refuse to let Reggie play he would probably sue them.
    
    				/Don
110.74METSNY::francusMets in '93Fri Jul 16 1993 16:504
I thought the Celtics doctors concurred that Lewis could play basketball.

The Crazy Met
110.75AKOCOA::BREENStill Sox Bandwagon ticks availableFri Jul 16 1993 17:0513
    I think Jackie recommended a third party "uninvolved with the politics
    of Boston Hospitals" be brought in.
    
    Speaking of excellent boston writers, past and present of the distaff
    side:  Leslie Visser is having a lot of fun recovering from the broken
    hip she sufferred jogging what wis half the entertainment and sports
    world dropping off Italian dinners at the hosptal (USA Today).
    
    I still recall the excellent job she did with the BC Basketball fixing
    trial and the railroading of the 3rd stringer in place of the players
    who actually threw the games.
    
    b
110.76The VOD police are after me now!TNPUBS::NAZZAROTake me for a little whileFri Jul 16 1993 19:5912
    As someone who has known Leslie Visser for 15 years, she never knew
    if the balls were bloen up or stuffed up for the longest time.  She
    turned a cheerleading career at BC into a sportswriting job at the
    Globe because she used to hang around with the Shaughnessy-Ryan-Madden-
    Montville crowd.  She never had an original thought in her life.
    She pissed off practically every writer on the Globve staff, even those
    who helped get her the job, by continually using other people's ideas,
    quotes, and even parts of interviews.  If she were a guy, she woulda
    gotten bounced.  SHe finally realized the print medium was not for
    her, married Dick Stockton, and the rest is history.
    
    NAZZ
110.77ROYALT::ASHEI like mine with french fried potatoesFri Jul 16 1993 20:013
    So you respect and admire the hard work and originality Leslie puts
    into her work?  Or did I misinterpret what you're saying?
    
110.78He still doesn't know if the balls are blown up or stuffedNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jul 16 1993 20:115
    
    Marrying a dweeb like Stockton is what did it for me...
    
    glenn
    
110.79AKOCOA::BREENStill Sox Bandwagon ticks availableFri Jul 16 1993 20:213
    I agree that her BC straight basketball coverage was hopeless.
    
    But for something like a trial I was impressed.
110.8093-94 scheduleFRETZ::HEISERlight without heatFri Jul 23 1993 21:48184
$!    Command format:   
$!    
$!    $ @celtics p1 p2 p3
$!
$!    p1 = item to search for, such as opponent's name, TV station, day of week)
$!    p2 = forecasting switch; enter Y to enable; N or blank to disable
$!    p3 = if p2 is Y, enter a number from 1-31; 7 is the default
$!    
$ Save_Message = F$Environment("Message")
$ Set Message/Nosever/Noid/Notext/Nofac
$ Say :== Write sys$output
$ dow = "''f$cvtime(""today"",,""weekday"")'"
$ td = "''f$time()'"
$ day= "''f$extract(0,2,td)'"
$ month=f$extract(3,3,td)
$ year=f$extract(7,4,td)
$ file = f$environment("procedure")
$ gametoday = f$extract(3,4,f$time())+f$extract(8,2,f$cvtime("today"))
$ P1 = f$edit(P1,"collapse")
$ If P1 .eqs. "" 
$ then 
$ lookingfortoday = "TRUE"
$ p1 = gametoday
$ Say "Today's Boston Celtics' basketball game: "
$ else
$ Say "Selected Boston Celtics' basketball game(s): "
$ lookingfortoday = "FALSE"
$ endif
$ search 'file' 'p1'
$ is_there = $status
$ if is_there .eqs. "%X08D78053" 
$ then 
$ if lookingfortoday then Say "No game today."
$ if .not. lookingfortoday then Say "No such game."
$ endif
$next_n_days:
$ if P2 .eqs. "" .or. P2 .eqs. " " then goto done
$ if P2 .eqs. "Y" 
$ then
$      at_a_glance = 7
$      if P3 .eqs. "" .or. P3 .eqs. " " then P3 = at_a_glance
$      if P3 .lt. 1 .or. P3 .gt. 31 then goto bad_reply
$ else
$      if P2 .nes. "N" then goto bad_reply
$      goto done
$ endif
$ Say "Boston Celtic games in next "+"''P3'"+" days:"
$ month = f$edit(f$extract(0,3,"''p1'"),"UPCASE")
$ n_day = f$extract(4,2,"''p1'")
$ count = 1
$next_day:
$ n_day = n_day + 1
$ if month .eqs. "OCT" .AND. n_day .gt. 31 
$ then 
$ month = "NOV" 
$ goto new_month 
$ endif
$ if month .eqs. "NOV" .AND. n_day .gt. 30 
$ then 
$ month = "DEC" 
$ goto new_month 
$ endif
$ if month .eqs. "DEC" .AND. n_day .gt. 31 
$ then 
$ month = "JAN" 
$ goto new_month 
$ endif
$ if month .eqs. "JAN" .AND. n_day .gt. 31 
$ then 
$ month = "FEB" 
$ goto new_month 
$ endif
$ if month .eqs. "FEB" .AND. n_day .gt. 28 
$ then 
$ month = "MAR" 
$ goto new_month 
$ endif
$ if month .eqs. "MAR" .AND. n_day .gt. 31 
$ then 
$ month = "APR" 
$ goto new_month 
$ endif
$ if month .eqs. "APR" .AND. n_day .gt. 23 then goto say_playoffs
$ goto test_for_game
$new_month:
$ n_day = "1"
$test_for_game:
$ if n_day .lt. 10 then n_day = "0" + f$edit("''n_day'","collapse")
$ p1 = "''month'" + "-" + "''n_day'"
$ search 'file' 'p1'
$ count = count + 1
$ if count .le. P3 then goto next_day
$ goto done
$say_playoffs:
$ SAY "Playoffs due to start... schedule is TBD!!!"
$ goto done
$bad_reply:
$ Say "Invalid reply."
$ goto done
$ done:
$ set mess'Save_Message'
$ EXIT
NOV-05     New York           Friday     7:30
NOV-06  at Washington         Saturday   7:30
NOV-08     Milwaukee          Monday     7:30    
NOV-10  at Philadelphia       Wednesday  8:00
NOV-12     Charlotte          Friday     7:30
NOV-13  at Chicago            Saturday   8:30
NOV-17     New Jersey         Wednesday  7:30
NOV-19     Orlando            Friday     7:30
NOV-20  at Indiana            Saturday   7:30
NOV-22     Indiana            Monday     7:30      (at Hartford) 
NOV-24  at Detroit            Wednesday  7:30
NOV-26     Miami              Friday     7:30
NOV-27  at Milwaukee          Saturday   9:00
NOV-30  at Atlanta            Tuesday    7:30
DEC-01     Washington         Wednesday  7:30
DEC-03     Portland           Friday     7:30
DEC-07  at New Jersey         Tuesday    8:00
DEC-08     Sacramento         Wednesday  7:30 
DEC-10  at Orlando            Friday     7:30
DEC-11  at Miami              Saturday   7:30
DEC-13     Philadelphia       Monday     7:30
DEC-15     Chicago            Wednesday  7:30 
DEC-17     Utah               Friday     7:30
DEC-22     Atlanta            Wednesday  7:30
DEC-23  at Charlotte          Thursday   7:30 
DEC-26  at San Antonio        Sunday     8:30
DEC-27  at Phoenix            Monday     9:00
DEC-29  at Utah               Wednesday  9:00
DEC-30  at LA Clippers        Thursday  10:30
JAN-02     New Jersey         Sunday     7:00
JAN-05  at Cleveland          Wednesday  7:30
JAN-07     Cleveland          Friday     7:30
JAN-08  at Minnesota          Saturday   8:00
JAN-10  at Philadelphia       Monday     7:30
JAN-12     Houston            Wednesday  7:30
JAN-14     LA Clippers        Friday     8:00
JAN-16     Denver             Sunday     7:00 
JAN-18  at Houston            Tuesday    8:30
JAN-19  at Dallas             Wednesday  8:30
JAN-21     Golden State       Friday     7:30
JAN-24     Dallas             Monday     7:30
JAN-26     Miami              Wednesday  7:30
JAN-30     Phoenix            Sunday    12:30
FEB-01  at New York           Tuesday    7:30
FEB-02     Seattle            Wednesday  7:30
FEB-04     San Antonio        Friday     7:30
FEB-09     Detroit            Wednesday  7:30
FEB-15  at Orlando            Tuesday    7:30
FEB-17     New Jersey         Thursday   7:30       (at Hartford) 
FEB-19  at Golden State       Saturday  10:30
FEB-20  at Portland           Sunday    10:30
FEB-22  at Sacramento         Tuesday   10:30
FEB-23  at Denver             Wednesday  9:00 
FEB-25  at Seattle            Friday    10:00
FEB-27  at LA Lakers          Sunday    10:30
MAR-02     Cleveland          Wednesday  7:30
MAR-04     LA Lakers          Friday     8:00
MAR-07  at Miami              Monday     7:30 
MAR-11     New York           Friday     7:30
MAR-13     Miami              Sunday     7:00
MAR-14  at Charlotte          Monday     7:30
MAR-16     Chicago            Wednesday  7:30
MAR-19  at New York           Saturday 	 1:00
MAR-20     Atlanta            Sunday    12:00
MAR-24  at Washington         Thursday   7:30
MAR-27     Philadelphia       Sunday 	 2:30       (at Hartford) 
MAR-29  at Milwaukee          Tuesday    8:30
MAR-20     Indiana            Wednesday  7:30
APR-01     Washington         Friday     7:30
APR-03  at Philadelphia       Sunday     7:00
APR-05  at New Jersey         Tuesday    7:30
APR-06  at Atlanta            Wednesday  7:30
APR-08     Minnesota          Friday     7:30
APR-10  at Detroit            Sunday 	 1:00
APR-11  at Indiana            Monday     7:30
APR-13     Detroit            Wednesday  7:30
APR-15     Orlando            Friday     7:30
APR-17  at Washington         Sunday 	12:30
APR-19     Milwaukee          Tuesday    7:30
APR-19     Charlotte          Thursday   7:30 
APR-22  at Chicago            Friday     8:30
APR-24  at Cleveland          Sunday 	 3:30
110.81RIPSALEM::DIFRUSCIAWed Jul 28 1993 09:394
    Reggie Lewis died last night. Lewis collapsed at Brandeis univeristy.
    Lewis was shooting baskets when he lost consciousness.
    
    
110.82Too sadSALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindWed Jul 28 1993 10:5132
Needless to say, I was shocked to hear the news of Reggie.  Certainly, I 
didn't expect to hear such a thing prior to his actually playing the game.
For it to happen in a shoot-around makes you wonder how competent his 
doctor is.

There certainly will be a tremendous controversy in the coming weeks over
the medical opinions Reggie received.  The two most famous are the ones 
given by the initial team that had first treated him for the first "fainting"
spell.  This team had determined that he was at high risk.  Reggie and his
family then got a second opinion, after many tests, which resulted in his
feeling that he could play at the pro level again.  Naturally, Reggie wanted
to believe the good news.  We all tend to do that.

Now, I understand from radio reports that a third, unsolicited, opinion was
rendered by a doctor on the West coast who had just recently treated a college
player for a similar, if not identical, condition.  This player suffered a 
second attack and the doctor made a public statement that Reggie should NOT
return to the game and that he should be fitted with a defibrillator.

In any case, the city of Boston has lost a kind and gentle man, one who was
quite involved in community activities.  Obviously, his families loss is
greater.  His wife is pregnant with a second child.  May God look over her
and her children.

I understand that the reason the public announcement was so late, roughly 10:30
P.M., was that they were having a real problem contacting Reggie's mother, who
lives in the Baltimore area.  I know that Bob Lobel reported at 10:00 that
Reggie's wife had left the hospital about an hour earlier, which would make 
one think that the worst had happened, yet the official announcement kept
getting delayed.  Now, I understand why.  

Lee
110.83AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOSWed Jul 28 1993 12:293
Whata tragic loss.  I too am stunned.

John "Reggie=Celtic Pride)" R.
110.84CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Wed Jul 28 1993 12:319
    I was and am still shocked.  RIP, Reggie.
    
    I was watching ESPN with the sound off (working up budget numbers for
    my new home) and saw Reggie Lewis' picture on the screen with 1965-1993
    under his face.
    
    I almost lost it.
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
110.85CNTROL::CHILDSthey ought to let em wear dressesWed Jul 28 1993 12:5819
 Certainly not unexpected though. Knowing what happen to Hank should have
 been enough to scare him away despite what the doctors says. Still you
 can't fault him from trying. Ain't one of here who wants to hear he can't
 do something he loves with a passion. I'd have probably done the same
 thing if I was in his shoes. It's wasn't for the money, it was for the
 love of the game.

 Friend of mine's BIL workes at NE ans is a close friend of Reggie. He
 was talking to him him just sunday night as a matter of fact. Anyways
 one his story about Reggie's kindness was that he was the only Celtic
 to offer the ballboys rides home after games. 

 Guy worked so hard all his life and achieved all-star status, what a shame
 27 is just to young.

 R.I.P #35 we'll miss ya badly

 mike  
110.86RIP #35RAAJI::MORGANYou were good, Reg...Wed Jul 28 1993 13:076
    It's not too often that tears come to my eyes when hearing about
    someone I don't personally know passing away, but this is one time 
    they came.
    
    					Steve
    
110.87Nothing less than the best people to wear a uniform...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jul 28 1993 13:106
    
    Along with Clemente, the saddest story I have ever heard from the
    sports world.  RIP Reggie Lewis.
    
    glenn
    
110.88METSNY::francusMets in '93Wed Jul 28 1993 13:2211
Got home in time for the SportsCenter after the ball game - about 1:30AM.
Heard the news about Lewis and needed to hear it a second time before
actually believing it. A real shock.

Most of you know my opinions of the Boston media but they have been
handling this tragedy in a professional and sensitive way.

I wonder if they will be able to determine if shooting baskets caused his
death or if a simple stroll on the street would have also caused it.

The Crazy Met
110.89CAM3::WAYI'd walk the wire for youWed Jul 28 1993 13:4113
I was shocked.

Somehow my brother knew at 9:30 PM, because he called me.  Whether he was
on Prodigy in the sports-wire or what I don't know.   

I really can't remember a year where so many sports figures have died so
young.  Okay, you expect to hear about a couple former baseball players
or football players who pass away at 85, silently in their sleep, but
this year so many have died in their prime.....


'Tis a truly sad day (yet again),
'Saw
110.90PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 28 1993 13:466
110.91MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jul 28 1993 13:579
    I never listen to sports-talk radio but I did after I heard the
   news about Reggie last night while I was at the gym. Every host
   and every caller had a "what a nice guy Reggie is" story. And 
   more than anything, more than as the best player to ever come 
   out of Northeastern, more than as the captain of the Celtics,
   it's as a genuinely nice, good person that Reggie will be re-
   membered. This is a tragedy of gargantuan proportions for every
   one who had even a passing acquaintance with the man.
110.92SALEM::SCALZOAll the worlds a stageWed Jul 28 1993 16:377
    this  is unbelievable!!!! I still am stunned. I could not believe this
    had happened when I heard the news last night......Another year with a
    black patch on the uni's.......This season will not be same. I hope his
    wife and family stay strong.
    
    jeff
    
110.93I apologize, this made me very angry and I had to vent itNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jul 28 1993 17:1913
        
> Most of you know my opinions of the Boston media but they have been
> handling this tragedy in a professional and sensitive way.
    
    Obviously you have not read that idiot Dan Shaughnessy's column in
    today's Globe (which I just did).  Not only is my initial inclination 
    to disagree with about 90% of what he's said, but I find it a premature, 
    speculative, unprofessional, insensitive, sensationalistic capitalization 
    on a tragedy of almost unspeakable proportions.  It's just too bad that 
    Dan couldn't have waited even 24 hours before cashing in.
    
    glenn
     
110.94CAM3::WAYI'd walk the wire for youWed Jul 28 1993 17:2922
>    Obviously you have not read that idiot Dan Shaughnessy's column in
>    today's Globe (which I just did).  Not only is my initial inclination 
>    to disagree with about 90% of what he's said, but I find it a premature, 
>    speculative, unprofessional, insensitive, sensationalistic capitalization 
>    on a tragedy of almost unspeakable proportions.  It's just too bad that 
>    Dan couldn't have waited even 24 hours before cashing in.
>    
>    glenn

Glenn, 

Could you clip that column and send it to me (mail stop RCH-2B/10) or
at my home address?

As you know I'm kind of a student of sportswriting and something in me
tells me I should read this column.....


thanks,
'Saw
     

110.95RIP, #35. RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Jul 28 1993 17:399
    Loosen up those fingers Waugamain and type the article in, ya lazy bum. 
    
    Also, could someone recap the scenario that involved the C's doctor
    (don't play?), Reggie's doctor (play), and the 3rd opinion he received. 
    And also what was the Celtics position on Reggie - were they gonna let
    him play, or had they effectively cut him from the roster.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
110.96Took me a while to type this - somebody may have beat me to itCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey and Melanie have a new house...Wed Jul 28 1993 18:3329
Unfortunately, the whole scenario with Reggie Lewis was/is a sad one.

In a nutshell (I'm sure people [read MAC] will correct me if I'm wrong), after
Reggie's collapse in the playoffs, he landed in New England Baptist Hospital.
This in one of the several hospitals in "hospital circle" in Boston, generally
recognized as one of the better medical areas in the world.  The Celtics 
assembled a "Dream Team" of physicians, led by Dr. Estes.  They concluded that 
Reggie suffered from a heart condition (with a name about three inches long), 
and that Reggie should not play ball again.  The doctors were apparently lacking
in bedside manner and Reggie's wife, Donna, felt alienated.  She convinced 
Reggie to check himself out of Baptist and go across the street to Brigham and
Women's Hospital, where she had some ties (I beleive she once worked there).

It was at B&W where Reggie hooked up with Dr. Mudge and his crew, who ran
their own battery of tests, and concluded that Reggie suffered from a 
fainting condition, that could be regulated with medication.  Dr. Mudge and 
Reggie held a news conference and announced this.

During this time the Celtics were strangly quiet on the subject.  They kind
of said "well if the doctors say he is OK, we guess he si OK".  Then, a couple
weeks ago, a doctor from California (?) cited a case similar to Reggie, where
his patient returned to playing basketball recreationally, and suffered a 
massive heart attack, but lived.  He claimed it served as a warning to Reggie,
and his patient made a similar statement.

It is a shame to lose a great basketball player, and great member of the 
community like Reggie Lewis this way.

RIP #35
110.97MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jul 28 1993 18:3728
  Actually, Chris, it's a pretty long article. The jist of it is Shaugnessy
 raking Dr, Mudge, the doc who cleared reggie to play, and the 'Tics over the
 coals. He implies that Mudge thought he was "the smartest man in the world"
 and basically calls the Celtics organization spineless for not stopping Reggie.
 Maybe Dan is just overly emotional about this or maybe he's having a bad day.
 I'd hate to think that all of that animus is just staged.

  A basic synopsis of the events involving the interplay among the doctors goes
 something like this:

       Reggie collapses.

       The Celts doctor, who is an Orthopedic man, believe it is a heart
       problem and calls in several cardiac specialists - the now famous
       "Dream Team".

       After ten days of tests the DT states that Reggie has an arrythmic
       heart beat caused by a mediacl condition that I can't spell and he 
       should not ever play b-ball again.

       In the middle of the night Reggie leaves New England Baptist Hospital
       for Brigham&Women's Hospital. The reason given was that Reggie and his 
       wife like the doctors and the 'Tics were leaving Reggie and his wife out
       of the loop.

       Reggie's doctor at B&W clears Reggie to play after three days of tests
       when he declares that Reggie merely has a fainting condition.
110.98unbelievableFRETZ::HEISERchase the kangarooWed Jul 28 1993 18:388
    I'm still stunned as well.  I didn't hear/see the news until I passed a
    news stand on campus this morning.  My heart sank when I saw the
    headlines.
    
    The NBA's most successful franchise sure has been snakebit the last 6
    years.  Bias, Bird, and now Reggie...
    
    Mike
110.99Globe Article.ASABET::M_BARRYWed Jul 28 1993 18:4823
    
    
    I've read Shaughnessy a number of times on a number of different
    issues, and one thing that always, always comes through is that he is 
    passionate in his views, whether the issue is Butch Hobson and the Red
    Sox or Dave Gavitt and the Celtics.
    
    What I got from the article was that the Celtics never took a position
    on Reggie's health and his status on the team once Reggie "stepped over
    the line" and got the second opinion from Mudge. What Shaughnessy was
    trying to say is that they should have, and that position should have
    been that Reggie should not play.
    
    I honestly do not think that he was making capital on this tragedy. He
    obviously believes that Mudge and the Celtics bear some of the blame
    for what is a senseless death of a decent young man. He believes that
    Mudge was motivated by ego and the Celtics by fear of litigation.
    
    I can sense a rathole coming on this one. I certainly hope that's not
    the case.
    
    
    
110.100Correction on time lineTNPUBS::NAZZAROTake me for a little whileWed Jul 28 1993 18:507
    Time table is somewhat incorrect a couple of notes back.
    
    Reggie was in New England Baptist with the "Dream Team" for three
    days, then snuck over to Brigham and Women's for seven days before
    Dr. Mudge came up with his diagnosis.
    
    NAZZ
110.101CTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyWed Jul 28 1993 19:1813
    A damn shame. A great loss. As has been stated, Reggie seemed like
    a truly nice guy. My prayers for his family and friends.
    
    I know we'll be seeing all sorts of accusatory fingers being pointed
    this way or that way, and it all won't bring Reggie back. I just
    have one simple question for all the doctors. After two separate
    different diagnosis, why couldn't both "teams" convene to compare
    notes? After all, from what I understand, these types of diagnoses
    are not pure black and white, there's plenty of room for
    interpretation.  
    
    MikeL
    
110.102Will the media handle this with some dignity and respect?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jul 28 1993 19:4755
    Maybe they have some information we don't, but the thing that I don't
    understand about this tragedy is a segment of the media's (including
    Shaughnessy's) reaction *already* towards the Celtics as a cold-hearted 
    bottom-line organization that could not have cared less about Reggie 
    Lewis, and which was only interested in its own liability at the same 
    time it was all too willing to have Lewis come back of his own volition 
    in the face of evidence that suggested he shouldn't.  This does not seem 
    to be at all in line with the facts of the case, which include Celtics 
    team doctor Arnold Scheller publicly announcing very early on that Lewis' 
    career was likely over, a recommendation initially supported by 
    preliminary tests conducted by an expert medical team assembled at the 
    team's behest, before those tests were aborted and left incomplete at
    Lewis' request.  At that time, there was no attempt to cover up Lewis' 
    condition for publicity purposes in the event that his career could 
    resume-- in fact, to the contrary, everyone involved with the case at 
    that point was very up front that the resumption of Lewis' basketball 
    career was a very secondary issue.
    
    Okay, so maybe the Celtics team doctor and the original medical team
    did not exercise the greatest personal compassion for Lewis and his
    family as they conducted their business in the wake of Lewis' initial
    collapse (which is apparently why Lewis chose to seek his own medical
    attention).  In my admittedly limited experience with hospitals this 
    is the norm and is the way that medical professionals generally work
    with people, especially adults-- but the important thing is still that 
    they get the diagnosis right!  There seemed to every effort expended 
    to do so...
    
    After Lewis received his own clearance to play, I perceived the Celtics' 
    silent endorsement of Lewis' decision to be one of respect for Lewis 
    more than anything at that very early stage, while again, some media 
    observers chose to see duplicity around liability issues.  Consider 
    the circumstances-- Reggie Lewis had not yet participated in a single 
    organized practice nor had he been monitored medically during or after 
    any workouts (and with his absence at the rookie camp there appeared to 
    be some lingering doubts in his own mind).  This is the time, without 
    a solid reason to dispute Lewis' physician Dr. Mudge's findings, to 
    publicly divorce themselves from Lewis' desire to play again?  Who can 
    know what would have transpired, when Lewis collapsed again and died 
    before barely even breaking a sweat for the first time since the
    original incident?    
    
    I sincerely hope that what I've been hearing in the media (even
    before the tragedy occurred, when Reggie didn't show at the rookie camp) 
    is just another example where if they aren't given full and complete 
    access to an issue or a story (for some very good personal reasons), 
    it's their job to assume the worst in all people and run with that 
    premise.  Or at least maybe I want to believe that that's what might 
    happen at the surface with some of the shallower media outlets, and 
    the core media will be respectful so that this won't deteriorate into 
    an ugly, irrational public witchhunt.  Too much to ask? 
    
    glenn
    
110.103CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey and Melanie have a new house...Wed Jul 28 1993 20:1315
re: .102

I'm generally a skeptic when it comes to these things, but in this case I 
generally agree with Glenn.  The Celtics were between a rock and a hard 
place on this one.  They couldn't very well state that they did not want
Reggie on the team, since that would likely have a devastating effect on
his recovery, and bitterness and public outcry agains them.  They had 
doctors saying he was all right, and the ball was in Reggie's court to seek 
further advice, which he chose not to do.  Not too many options.  The media is 
looking for a story, what a surprise...

I'm still greatly saddened at the passing of a rare, admirable professional
athlete.

=Bob=
110.104DECWET::METZGERHiking in Glacier National Park.Wed Jul 28 1993 20:3720
My guees is that Reggie Lewis body was a ticking time bomb that was going to go
off when it wanted to. Despite all the technology and medical advances made in
the past 100 years there is still more that doctors don't know about the human
body than they do know.

I said this when he recieved conflicting diagnosis and I'll say it again.
Doctors can never be 100% sure as to what the problem is unless they can
diagnose the situation right when it happens. It's like having an intermittant
failure in your car and getting mad at the mechanic when he can't figure out
what it is.

The only thing Reggie could have done was erred on the side of caution and
retired in hopes that less physical stress would prolong his life. 

Either way no amount of finger pointing or scathing articles or lawsuits is
going to bring him back...I just hope he gets to play ball in the hereafter...


Metz
110.105VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDYouAin'tPlayingWakeForestAnymore!Wed Jul 28 1993 20:5124
	Gavitt runs the team, he doesn't own it.  If the owners' lawyers 
decided the team should've washed their hands and avoid legal responsibility 
with regards to the Reggie Lewis situation, and the owners agreed, then Dave 
Gavitt either went along or he's gone.  The sad fact is that in this litigious
society everybody practices CYA which is why the Celtics were so neutral on 
the issue and probably why Lewis didn't participate in the Celtics' rookie 
training camp.

	With regards to the doctors pooling their tests results together 
and trying to arrive at a common conclusion, get real.  The only thing 
that's larger than these guys' salaries is their egos, and remember two 
different hospitals were involved also.  Despite the fact that it's 
beneficial to the patient, it just ain't going to happen.  I said at the 
time that Reggie should've sought a third opinion, but he chose to believe 
the diagnosis that he wanted to hear.  Most of us would've probably done 
the same if we were in his shoes.  2020Hindsight can always prevent the 
unwanted from happening.  All the whatifs in the world can't bring Reggie 
Lewis back, but it will not stop a cadre of lawyers from trying to make a 
bundle of money off this tragedy.

	The counter to Dan Shaughnessy's column was an excellent piece by 
Jackie MacMullan.

				/Don
110.106PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 28 1993 21:245
    I'd also like to think that Gavitt and Co. have a conscience.  I would
    have a real hard time taking a stand on either side of the issue.  I
    would certainly have a hard time being forced to make a decision on a
    person's life and career (and for some people life and career are the
    same thing).
110.107Choices...ASABET::M_BARRYWed Jul 28 1993 21:3528
    .102
    
    My point is that Shaughnessy reacted more like a fan than a journalist
    in this case. He was obviously angry at Reggie's death. I may be naive,
    but I don't feel he was doing anything but expressing that anger.
    
    You're right, the Celtics were caught between a rock and a hard place.
    Consider their options when Lewis gets the second opinion which allowed
    him to continue to play in the NBA.
    
    They could have (and did) publicly embrace the second opinion while
    privately harboring doubts, and doing nothing to monitor the progress
    of Reggie and, apparently, doing nothing further to clarify the
    diagnosis. They were probably guilty of nothing more than any of us
    were: Glad to put an ugly incident behind us and hope that the guy was
    going to be OK.
    
    They could have said, "We're sorry, but we're not convinced that you're
    well enough to play." This most likely would have been extremely
    unpopular with the fans and probably would have resulted in a fairly
    good sized lawsuit. It also might have been misinterpreted as pure
    ass-covering by a lot of people. Whether or not it would have actually
    had any affect on prolonging Reggie's life seems doubtful, given what
    we've heard about the fact that he wasn't really exerting himself at
    all at the time he passed away.
    
    
    
110.108A few more pointsSALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindThu Jul 29 1993 11:1126
I heard on the radio this AM that Reggie HAD gotten a third opinion from 
a doctor on the West Coast who agreed that he could play.

Anyone else here of this?  If true, it obviously wasn't the same doctor out 
there who treated that college player who had a second attack.



How can the Celtics be held responsible?  If two teams of "expert" doctors
can't agree, how can a group of business men decide a medical issue?  I, too,
feel that the so-called teams should have gotten together and asked how 
there conclusions could vary so greatly.  Like, "Okay, what test results led
you to believe that Reggie (could, shouldn't) play?  Here are the tests, and
their results, which led us to believe just the opposite.  Can we work on this
and reach a consensus?"

Perhaps that's too simplistic, but the final responsibility came down to Reggie,
as he was medically capable of making a decision which affected HIS life.  By that,
I mean that he wasn't deemed mentally unable to make decisions.  He put his
trust and faith in someone and that someone was wrong, for whatever reason.

I also heard that Reggie had found out that his wife was pregnant on that very 
same day.

Lee
110.109VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDYouAin'tPlayingWakeForestAnymore!Thu Jul 29 1993 12:0613
    	Lee, this is the 90's.  One of the local stations last night had on
    some "legal scholar" saying how an athlete can't be held responsible
    for decisions he makes because he's under so much pressure.  This
    typifies a lawyers view of society, the "victim syndrome".  Everybody
    is a victim and the victimizer is anyone with deep pockets.
    
    	Personally I would hope that once Reggie is laid to rest his memory
    will not be dragged through a legal morass, because he was a great guy. 
    But every lawyer with an angle will try to get somebody who was
    involved with Reggie into some kind of suit.  I would be pleasantly
    shocked if this were not to happen.
    
    				/Don
110.110DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Thu Jul 29 1993 12:2425
    	If it hasn't been said, I'll say it:
    
    		Medicine is not an exact science
    
    	I agree with the previous note that suggested that the
    	Dream Team and Mudge and Crew should have gotten together.
    
    	Also, as the cardiologist of the fella who collapsed in
    	California said, he'd rather err on the side of life.
    
    	Look at Reggie's predicament:
    
    		He's playing NBA basketball
    		He's captain of the Celtics
    		He's got family responsibilities
    		He's only 27 years old
    		He's has no real occupation or training for anything
    			outside of basketball (I'm assuming here)
    
    	That's one tough decision for anyone.
    
    	It's a really sad situation. From all accounts, one very fine
    	person dead way too soon.
    
    	Scott
110.111DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Thu Jul 29 1993 12:268
    	Oh, yeah. I hate to say it, but I can seem some lawyers
    	getting their sticky fingers into this tragedy and making
    	an even bigger mess.
    
    	Sad about Mudge, too. As I said, medicine is not an exact
    	science.
    
    	Scott
110.112CAM3::WAYI'd walk the wire for youThu Jul 29 1993 13:1613
My brother, who works with doctors every day, has a saying that always
makes me stop and think:


	"Just remember," he says, "that half of all doctors finished
	 in the bottom half of their class in medical school"


Along with that, whoever said medicine is not an exact science is right.
Sometimes you do everything right and the patients still die.


'Saw
110.113PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 29 1993 13:377
110.114Sad summer for the NBAOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Jul 29 1993 13:3713
    Who were the top 5 players in the Atlantic division last year?
    
    Ewing, NY - C
    O'Neal - Orlando - C
    Coleman, NJ -F
    Lewis - Boston G
    Petrovic - NJ -G
    
    Two of them are gone. Shocking! Tragedies have seemed to happen in
    pairs this year.
    
    Racing drivers Kulwicki and Allison
    Dodgers Drysdale and Campy
110.115CAM3::WAYThe thrill of the grass...Thu Jul 29 1993 14:1518
110.116Where the Celtics owners are culpableTNPUBS::NAZZAROTake me for a little whileThu Jul 29 1993 14:3826
    Here is where I fault the Celtics (not Dave Gavitt, but Cohen and
    Gaston, the owners):  They provided no follow-up care for Reggie.  
    They did not oversee his progress.  They did not provide him with a
    nurse, physician, or anyone or conduct a regimen that would allow
    him to return to the NBA.  Any other kind of injury, teams are all
    over their players to follow a specific rehabilitation process.
    Where was that in this case?  The truth is, the owners distanced
    themselves from Reggie because they were afraid of the liability
    issues.  And that to me is a tragedy.
    
    Ed Pinckney injures his knee.  The Celtics supervise the rehab work
    for him, get regular evaluations, adjust his program as needed.
    Where was this for Reggie?  Eight years ago, when Cedric Maxwell would
    not do exactly what the Celtics wanted (in effect, tried to set up
    his own rehab program), the Celtics traded his ass.  In Reggie's case,
    they ignored him.  What sense does that make?????
    
    FWIW, the "Dream Team" doctors were offered an opportunity to examine
    Dr. Mudge's findings a week after he announced his diagnosis.  They
    were instructed by the Celtics to respectfully decline.  Why??????
    If Reggie's health was of primary importance to Cohen and Gaston, why
    wouldn't they have insisted on all the doctors getting together,
    comparing notes, and setting up a specific, detailed rehab program
    for Reggie?
    
    NAZZ
110.117SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindThu Jul 29 1993 15:093
    And there lies the conspiracy.
    
    Lee
110.118Special on ReggieMSBCS::COULOMBEThu Jul 29 1993 15:116
    
     7/30 Friday night.. Sports Channel 7:30pm  Reggie Special half hour
    long  Will play again on Sunday night sametime...
    
     Please Check your local listing to comfirm these times..
     My Info came from 105.7 radio FM.
110.119VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDYouAin'tPlayingWakeForestAnymore!Thu Jul 29 1993 15:1714
	Well NAZZ, a few weeks ago either Jackie or Peter May had a column 
in the Sunday Globe postulating that the Celtics backed off from Reggie the 
minute he sought a second opinion because their lawyers counseled them to 
do so.  Apparently at that point Gaston's and Cohen's lawyers felt the team 
was absolved from any legal responsibility with regards to Reggie's 
condition.  What's legal isn't always what's ethical.  The team should've 
repsected Reggie's wish for a second opinion then encouraged/coerced the 
two sides to compare notes and possibly even counsel Reggie to seek a 
third opinion.  They should've stayed actively involved in the process and 
not the course they chose of CYA.  Would Reggie be alive today had this 
happened?  Who knows, but the way the team acted towards Reggie the last 
few months sent a strong message to the rest of the Celtics "family".

				/Don
110.120ROYALT::ASHESometimes love just ain't enoughThu Jul 29 1993 15:3222
    I was out yesterday... so from my timetable flipping around...
    
    7:15: I had a softball game, flipped on WEEI and they talked about
          his collapse and he was in "very critical condition"
    
    7:30-7:45ish... Guy from WEEI says new conference coming in a few
    minutes.  Says ML is around, Myers says he needs to talk to him.
    (I think he was confirming off the air that he was gone).
    
    no news conference held until Reggie's mother is notified.
    
    8:00 sighting of a priest and a medical examiner
    
    9:20 ESPN announces "unnamed sources have confirmed he has past away" 
    
    9:30 Channel 5 announces what ESPN reported.
    
    10:20 official news conference.
    
    BTW, New England News Channel was great with their coverage.  No one
    else really kept up with it besides WEEI.
    
110.121But did they try, and should they push against his will?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 29 1993 15:4046
    
    > Any other kind of injury, teams are all
    > over their players to follow a specific rehabilitation process.
    > Where was that in this case?  The truth is, the owners distanced
    > themselves from Reggie because they were afraid of the liability
    > issues.  And that to me is a tragedy.
    >  
    > FWIW, the "Dream Team" doctors were offered an opportunity to examine
    > Dr. Mudge's findings a week after he announced his diagnosis.  They
    > were instructed by the Celtics to respectfully decline.  Why??????
     
    I don't know what was going on behind the scenes, but I've been left
    with the impression that when Lewis signed himself out of the Baptist
    hospital, the Celtics and their team of doctors were no longer legally
    permitted to take part in his medical care without his permission.  Is
    this true?  Up until the time that Lewis left, were the Celtics indeed
    *insisting* that they take care of all medical arrangements (as with Ed
    Pinckney's knee, etc.)?  To me, at least up until that point, it seemed 
    as if they were doing everything humanly possible, without trying to
    protect only their own interests, even though the emerging diagnosis
    appeared to be that Lewis should never play again.  How much can you do
    when that medical care is in essence refused by the individual?  This 
    is why I don't see the later lack of participation by the Celtics so 
    much as a liability issue, but also an ethical one.  If told to back 
    off, should they?  Now we're hearing about independent third parties 
    already being involved, and the possibility that until the issue was 
    resolved that Lewis would not have been allowed to participate in 
    Celtics' practices.  We just don't have the details yet, and it's 
    premature to point fingers in any direction, in my mind... 
    
    In the larger human picture, yes, I too see this as possibly a very
    preventable tragedy if the world were totally free of constraint and
    information flowed qucikly and completely without hindrance for any 
    reason, and in that sense that this happened is sad and it hurts.  But 
    I am not yet able to say that in our real world there is anyone to 
    blame, or that given Reggie's choice for the course his future would 
    take that there would have been any other result within reasonable 
    responses from all external parties to his decisions.  Again, it's 
    really too early to say for sure, but that's my initial inclination-- 
    that the Celtics and their doctors were being respectful of Reggie's 
    decision as he attempted to resolve the medical issues in his own way, 
    by his own choice.  Unfortunately, Lewis died long before the point 
    anyone thought the hard choices would have to be made.
    
    glenn
    
110.122Reggie's heart was goin' lots faster makin' his wife pregnant.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Jul 29 1993 16:1713
    re: Mac
    
    No, there's no conspiracy here.  This is no HankGathers case, and
    here's why:
    
    As somebody who's shot baskets just about all my life I can accurately
    report that it's about as strenuous as a walk around the block.  Your
    ticker ain't goin' like a rabbit (i.e. PaulWesthaid wasn't the coach).
    The guy was *shooting baskets*.  He could just as easily have dropped
    dead getting out of bed or walking into the shower.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
110.123From ClarinetMIMS::ROLLINS_RPaying for decades of Demo.CongressThu Jul 29 1993 16:1884
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.basketball,clari.tw.health
Subject: Debate heats up over death of Celtics star Reggie Lewis
Keywords: obituary, basketball, men's professional, cardiovascular, health
Message-ID: <us-lewisUR63a_3lS@clarinet.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 93 19:33:35 PDT
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
Note: (complete writethru -- updating; celtics demanded 3rd opinion)
Lines: 74
 
	BOSTON (UPI) -- Words of praise poured in Wednesday for Boston Celtics
star Reggie Lewis as a debate intensified over whether his death from a
heart attack was avoidable and if the doctor who told him he could play
-- despite warnings not to -- was negligent.
	Lewis, 27, died of cardiac arrest Tuesday night following a light
workout shooting baskets at Brandeis University in suburban Waltham as
he prepared for the upcoming season.
	An autopsy was conducted Wednesday by a state medical examiner, but
the results were not expected to be made public for several days.
	Three months ago, after Lewis collapsed during a playoff game, a team
of heart specialists told him he was suffering from a heart problem that
threatened his life and career and that he should retire.
	Lewis, however, sought a second opinion and was told by Brigham and
Women's Hospital cardiologist Dr. Gilbert Mudge that he did not have a
heart problem and could resume the activity level required by a
professional basketball player.
	Boston television station WLVI, Channel 56, reported Wednesday night
that the Celtics had told Lewis he must obtain a third opinion from
another panel of physicians before he would be allowed to return to the
team.
	``They wanted all the bases covered before they allowed him to play,''
said sportscaster Michael Barkann, quoting team sources.
	Mudge has not been available for comment since Lewis' death, but the
hospital issued a statement Wednesday saying it was ``deeply saddened''
but that it ``would be premature at this time to make any further
comments.''
	About 90 minutes before Lewis collapsed, Mudge had told Boston Globe
sportswriter Will McDonough that Lewis was ``doing fine'' and ``working
out at his own pace'' getting ready for the season.
	Lewis collapsed around 5 p.m. and witnesses said they saw him on his
back ``gasping for air.'' He was pronounced dead about 7:30 p.m. at the
nearby Waltham-Weston Hospital.
	Members of the Celtics family and others described Lewis Wednesday as
not just a great athlete, but a ``great human being.''
	``This is a time of incredible grief,'' said Dave Gavitt, the senior
executive vice president of the Celtics.
	NBA Commissioner David J. Stern issued a statement Wednesday saying
the Celtics and the league ``have lost a bright, talented member of our
family.''
	``Away from the court, he was an outstanding young man who always
made the NBA, the Celtics and the city of Boston proud to be associated
with him,'' Stern said.
	Lewis is survived by his wife Donna and 10-month-old son, Reginald
Jr. His wife is pregnant with their second child. Lewis played high
school basketball at Dunbar in Baltimore, where his mother, Inez, lives.
	Lewis averaged a team-high 20.8 points per game each of the last two
years. He was the team's first-round draft pick in 1987, 22nd overall,
out of Northeastern University.
	The Celtics said funeral arrangements were incomplete.
	Medical malpractice experts said the major potential liability in the
case rests with the doctor Lewis relied upon to resume his career. If
that decision turns out to be medically incorrect and a substantial
contributing cause of Lewis' death, ``there could be a potential claim
for negligence,'' one expert said.
	Hank Gathers of Loyola Marymount, who led the NCAA in scoring and
rebounding in 1989, collapsed during a game March 4, 1990 and died of
cardiomyopathy. The university and one of the doctors who treated
Gathers for his heart problems settled a civil suit for about $1.5
million.
	After Lewis collapsed during Boston's 112-101 victory over the
Charlotte Hornets April 29, he underwent a series of tests at New
England Baptist Hospital. A group of heart specialists put together by
the Celtics advised him to retire.
	Lewis checked himself out and underwent another battery of tests at
Brigham & Women's Hospital. There Mudge gave Lewis the go-ahead to
resume his professional basketball career.
	Mudge determined that Lewis had a normal athlete's heart with normal
function and said he was ``quite optimistic'' that Lewis could resume
his pro career ``without limitation under medical supervision.''
	Despite the findings of the team of specialists, Mudge said there was
no evidence that Lewis had any form of cardiomyopathy or life-
threatening arrhythmia, but determined that the Celtics' star suffered
from neurocardiogenic syncope, an abnormal response of the heart rate
and blood pressure which can occur during peak exercise.
110.124Also from ClarinetMIMS::ROLLINS_RPaying for decades of Demo.CongressThu Jul 29 1993 16:1947
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.basketball,clari.tw.health
Subject: Celtics star sought third opinion
Keywords: obituary, basketball, men's professional, cardiovascular, health
Message-ID: <us-lewisUR563_3lT@clarinet.com>
References: <us-lewisUR7c1_3lS@clarinet.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 93 5:09:30 PDT
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
Note: (adding details, background)
Lines: 36
 
	BOSTON (UPI) -- Boston Celtics captain Reggie Lewis, who died Tuesday
night of a heart attack, had sought a third opinion from heart
specialists in California to resolve a debate over whether he would be
able to play again.
	One of those cardiologists agreed with Boston Dr. Gilbert Mudge that
Lewis was suffering only from a benign fainting condition, and not the
more threatening heart problem that another team of doctors initially
diagnosed.
	California Dr. William Stevenson said in Thursday's Boston Globe,
however, he felt Lewis should be monitored during physical exertion to
catch an episode and determine the diagnosis.
	Mudge had also made the same recommendation, but had given Lewis the
green-light to resume physical activities.
	Lewis, 27, collapsed and suffered a fatal heart attack on Tuesday
night while shooting baskets at Brandeis University in Waltham as he
began his preparations for the upcoming season. He was not being
monitored at the time.
	Reports said the Celtics had told Lewis he would need a third opinion
from another team of doctors before they would allow him to rejoin the
team.
	An autopsy was performed Wednesday, but the results were not expected
to be released for at least several days.
	Lewis was initially diagnosed with a potentially life-threatening
heart problem after collapsing during a playoff game at Boston Garden
three months ago. But another team of doctors led by Mudge said at the
time he was in no danger and could resume his career.
	Police have placed a 24-hour guard at the Sherborne home of Dr.
Mudge, who reportedly has received some death threats since Lewis'
death. Mudge reportedly is ``heartbroken'' over the death of the Celtics
star He has made no public comment.
	Mudge remained in seclusion, and friends asked the news media outside
his home to leave him alone. There has been much speculation that Mudge
may eventually be named in a medical malpractice suit because he gave
Lewis permission to resume physical exertion.
	Funeral services for Lewis were expected to be announced later
Thursday.
110.125ROYALT::ASHESometimes love just ain't enoughThu Jul 29 1993 16:596
    Anyone see Nightline lasted night?  Had Dr. Tim Johnson, Dan
    McShaugnessy and Terry Cummings on talking about it.  Included 
    "Can you make a competitve athlete stop playing legally?"
    "Should the Celtics have done more or different things to prevent
    this?"
    "What happens next time?"
110.126Lewis/Gathers: differences greater than any similaritiesTNPUBS::NAZZAROTake me for a little whileThu Jul 29 1993 17:1025
    I am sick and tired of the comparisons made between Reggie and Hank
    Gathers.  Gathers was placed on medication after his first incident,
    and secretly began weaning himself off the medication.  He felt that
    he was not playing as well on the medication, and was risking the
    loss of millions of dollars by playing poorly in his senior season,
    just before the NBA draft.  His family was dirt poor and they viewed
    him as their meal ticket out of the ghetto, and let him know that in no
    uncertain terms.  
    
    So Gathers was feeling pressure to perform better from his family, and
    an inner pressure to succeed to obtain a lucrative NBA contract. 
    Reggie was under no such pressure.
    
    Also, it needs to be stated that his death did NOT occur from his
    desire to return to the NBA.  It was NOT at an NBA practice, scrimmage,
    or game.  It was NOT at an informal, full-blown workout.  It took place
    when Reggie was shooting baskets, with another person retrieving the
    ball for him.  He was not even getting rebounds!  Whether he decided to
    return to the NBA or permanently retire is IRRELAVENT to how and when
    he died.  Although it is richly poetic that he died on a basketball
    court, it would have made issues a lot clearer if it occurred while he
    was out rescuing a cat from a tree or something.
    
    NAZZ
    
110.128I Would Have Been Nervous...STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Jul 29 1993 17:1320
      re: .122
    
      One thing that occured to me is that maybe Reggie's adrenaline
      could have been sky high.  I mean, I've had times where I was
      anticipating something where I was real nervous like giving a
      talk or awaiting a job interview - whatever.  During those times,
      with the anxiety, I've had some adrenaline rushes from nervous-
      ness.
    
      Now here's a guy who may have been about to play some basketball
      for the very first time.  We know now he had some doubts.  We know
      that he knew what the possibilities were if those doubts were true.
      If I was Reggie Lewis shooting a couple baskets, having some
      doubts, and knowing I was deciding to have a friendly little
      scrimmage in a little bit...I don't know, just from anxiety there 
      could have been one adrenaline rush.
    
      This is just so sad.
    
                                                    Tony
110.129PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 29 1993 17:146
110.130Coulda, woulda, shouldaVAOP28::RiceBeer SpongeThu Jul 29 1993 17:2511
It's way too late for finger-pointing. I subscribe to the New Orleans approach
to a friend's passing - lift a glass (or 4) in his honor and show your respect
by following his example of civilized behavior.

Can anyone doubt that there are Leprechauns in Beantown? Two consecutive first
round draft choices dead by the flukiest of occurances. I hope the bill for all 
those rings is paid now, Mr. L, and you'll go back to tipping in last second 
shots....

josh
110.131An overview of Celtics recent bad luck, from Bob Ryan (an excellent piece)TNPUBS::NAZZAROTake me for a little whileThu Jul 29 1993 19:12145
    Reprinted without permission from today's Boston Globe:
    
    AFTER 30 YEARS OF GLORY, 7 YEARS OF DOWNERS by Bob Ryan
    
    Whatever happened to the Midas Touch?
    
    For 30 years, the Boston Celtics seemed mystically blessed.  From the
    moment Red Auerbach managed to hornswaggle Bil Russell out of the
    clutches of both St. Louis and Cincinnati, to the sounding of the buzzer
    to signal championship #16 on that glorious June Sunday afternoon in
    1986, the Boston Celtics were the one American sports franchise that
    always seemed to do the right thing and always seemed to be smarter and
    luckier than all others.
    
    And now?
    
    Is there some sort of biblical retribution taking place?  That's one
    explanation for what has happened during the last seven years,
    culminating in the unspeakably horrible death of 27-year-old Reggie
    Lewis, dead of cardiac arrest under troubling circumstances.
    
    Consider all that went right during those giddy 30 years:
    
    1) Auewrbach recognizes Russell is the answer to his prayers and
    maneuvers to secure his draft rights.  As good as Auerbach suspected
    Russell might be, the gifted warrior from San Francisco turned out to
    be immesurably better.  America has never produced a more important
    team sports athlete.
    
    2) Drafting ninth and last in the 1962 first round, AUerbach picks John
    Havlicek of Ohio State.  Havlicek was the Ed McMahon to Jerry Lucas'
    Johnny Carson in college, but he turned out to be one of the handful of
    all-time basketball demigods as a professional.
    
    3) Auerbach listens to the advice of his players (Tom Heinsohn among
    them) and picks up a Los Angeles Laker discard named Don Nelson, who
    becomes the consummate role player, good enough to participate in five
    championships and have his #19 raised to the rafters.
    
    4) Auerbach schemes to extract a Kansas guard named Jo Jo White from
    the draft (Uncle Sam's not Walter Kennedy's), getting him into the
    Marine reserves.  He thus gets the second-best player available in the
    1969 draft (the best was a tall kid named Lew Alcindor) at #9.  Jo Jo
    plays on two title teams and gets his #10 up there with the other Celtic
    immortals.
    
    5) Auerbach takes an undersized Florida State center by the name of
    Dave Cowens, and the redhead overachieves to a staggering level as he
    becomes the backbone of two championship teams and the focal point of
    an attendance surge that contnues to this day.
    
    6) Auerbach drafts three signed NBA players in 1970.  Once is Charlie
    Scott, and Auerbach uses his NBA draft rights to secure Paul Silas from
    Phoenix two years later.
    
    7) Auerbach uses the first of two 1978 frist round draft picks to take
    a junior-eligible from Indiana State named Larry Bird.
    
    8) Auerbach trades the first and 13th picks in the 2980 draft for
    Robert Parish and the third choice in the draft, who becomes Kevin
    McHale.
    
    9) Danny Ainge tells the basketball world that he will stay with
    baseball, but Auerbach takes him in the second rouns of the 1982 draft
    anyway, and goes to court to get his man.  Ainge becomes a valued
    Celtic.
    
    10) Auerbach trades disgruntled Cedric Maxerll to the LA Clippers fo
    rthe fragile Bill Walton.  Walton couldn't practice in either uniform,
    but for the 1985-86 Celtics, Walton plays in 80 games and practices
    every day.  He wins the NBA's Sixth Man Award.
    
    The result of all this maneuvering and finagling, just plain smart
    thinking, and a lot of luck, was 16 titles in 30 years.
    
    Since then?
    
    1) Auerbach drafts Maryland forward Len Bias in 1986.  Within 18 hours,
    the great young prospect is dead of "cocaine intoxication."
    
    2) Walton is injured, allegedly while riding an exercise bike.  He only
    plays in six regular season games, and is a totally ineffective player
    in the '87 playoffs, after which he never plays again.
    
    3) Scott Wedman, a key member of the 1986 title team, plays only six
    more games as a Celtic because of a heel injury.
    
    4) Larry Bird requires double heel surgery and plays a mere six games
    during the 1988-89 season.
    
    5) Brian Shaw, a promising young guard, bolts the team for Italy after
    the 1988-89 season and is never the same after his return.
    
    6) Auerbach spurns Tim Hardaway, Shawn Kemp, and B.J. Armstrong, among
    others, to draft forward Michael Smith in 1989 with the 13th pick in the
    draft.
    
    7) Bird encounters severe back problems, eventually undergoing surgery. 
    He is forced to retire prematurely in the summer of 1992.
    
    8) Dee Brown, fresh from an exhilarating playoff performance against
    Detroit in 1991, injures his knee in practice just before the start of
    the 1991-92 season.  He has not returned to his pre-injury form.
    
    9) After struggling for five years with a variety of foot and ankle
    problems, McHale is forced to retire following the 1992-93 season.
    
    10) Reggie Lewis, team captain and one of the NBA's bright stars,
    collapses during a 1993 playoff game.  Amid much conflicting medical
    opinion, he attempts to resume his career and collapses during a benign
    workout.  Three hours later, he is dead.
    
    During the glory years, a standard joke around the NBA was that a
    friendly leprechaun resided in Boston Garden.  He influenced their
    thinking, and he even took an active part in games, knocking away the
    big shots (e.g., Frank Selvy in 1962, Michael Jordan in 1986).  These
    jokes are not heard any longer.
    
    The Celtics have tried desperately to change the recent course of
    history.  The brought in Dave Gavitt, a brilliant administrator and
    acknowledged basketball savant, to run the day-to-day operations of the
    team.  But after three years on the job, it seems to him that all he
    ever does is hold press conferences to discuss the latest dose of bad
    news.
    
    They have platoons of scouts.  They work ceaselessly to improve the
    team.  They have pursued every logical course of action.  They have
    spent untold millions of dollars.  Yet the fact is that each time there
    appears to be a step forward, something sets them back. 
    
    Lewis' death is the worst setback of all.  Losing Bird hurt, sure, but
    injuries are an occupational hazard, and Bird left behind three
    championships and special memories.  Quite aside from losing Reggie's
    20 points a game and clutch shooting, the Celtics have lost a very
    close friend, and it will not be a simple matter for them to go on next
    season.  No one really knew Len Bias here, but Reggie Lewis was true
    family.  He was like a brother, be it older or younger, to everyone on
    the team, and he was always a calming presence.  He was, above all,
    RELIABLE, in both a professional and personal sense.  It will be very
    difficult for the Kevin Gambles and the Dee Browns and the Alaa
    Abdelnabys to grasp the fact that Reggie is no longer here.
    
    As for the cosmic forces governing this seven year run of ill fortune,
    the Boston Celtics would respectfully submit that the point, whatever
    it is, has been made.
110.132likewise: we get the point, time to move onFRETZ::HEISERprime moverThu Jul 29 1993 19:421
    Ryan's got it right.  Even I said they were snakebit yesterday.
110.133ROYALT::ASHESometimes love just ain't enoughThu Jul 29 1993 20:186
    Snakebit?  Auerbach would say it's just whining...
    
    I thought about the Adrenelin (sp?) angle.  Wasn't Lewis experimenting
    with Ginseng on April 29th?  Doesn't that give you "quick energy". 
    Maybe that was part of it as well?
    
110.134DECWET::METZGERHiking in Glacier National Park.Thu Jul 29 1993 21:4113
How stupid does this make the decision of the trainer that sent lewis back into
the game ater he collapsed look? Hopefully other trainers will learn from this.

Snakebit? Bad Luck? Bah...the great marketing exercise called the NBA now
rewqards you for being bad not for being smart or working harder than the other
team. 

The Celtics will suck for a couple of years and then score big in a few
lotteries and be back in the pack before the new garden is broken in...


Metz
110.135FRETZ::HEISERprime moverFri Jul 30 1993 01:583
    Well the lottery looks inevitable at the moment for the Boys in Green.
    Anyone know what happened to CELTICS notes?  I keep getting
    'insufficient resources at remote node'...
110.136SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindFri Jul 30 1993 10:5322
    Metz, it may look bad for the trainer sending Reggie back in, but I can
    just hear the noise that's gonna be raised whenever a player is taken
    out and doesn't return.  "Wimp", "Quitter", etc.
    
    Why would you expect a trainer to be able to diagnose something that
    eluded a team of highly trained expert physicians, who had the time to
    conduct a battery of tests?  Even the conclusions of the tests were not
    cast in concrete, so how the hell is a trainer supposed to do any
    better in a matter of minutes with limited equipment, training and
    experience?
    
    The longer this goes on, the more information becomes available.  But,
    I doubt that everyone will be satisfied with the final conclusion.  
    According to what I read in yesterday's paper, this third opinion
    agreed with Dr. Mudge, which was that Reggie's condition was such that
    he should be monitored when performing under stress in order to record
    certain conditions that would occur during an "attack".  Hopefully,
    those records would help more closely define what was occurring, and
    thus increase the accuracy of the diagnosis.  I didn't read that ANY
    doctor, or team of doctors, unequivocally cleared him to play.
    
    Lee
110.137MIMS::ROLLINS_RPaying for decades of Demo.CongressFri Jul 30 1993 13:3670
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.basketball
Subject: Lewis family issues statement
Keywords: basketball, men's professional
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 93 17:56:20 PDT
ACategory: sports
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
Lines: 67
 
	Donna Harris-Lewis, the widow of Boston Celtics' captain Reggie
Lewis, issued a statement today which was read by her attorney, Jerome
Stanley, at the Celtics' administrative offices in Boston. The following
is the entire statement:
	``To the fans, friends and supporters throughout Boston and the
United States, we have all suffered a devastating and traumatic loss.
Reggie was much more than one of the best basketball players in the
world and captain of the Boston Celtics. Reggie was one of the kindest
and most gentle people ever to walk this earth. He was a loving husband,
a doting father and a true friend to many.
	``It is important that everyone know that Reggie was very serious and
focused about his health. Reggie and I and our advisors carefully and
meticulously scrutinized every medical opinion, and its respective
foundation, since his initial collapse.
	Reggie not only became intimately familiar with the doctors' opinion
in the initial ``dream team'' diagnosis but he also thoroughly and
completely understood the conflicting opinion issued by Dr. Mudge. Upon
the growth of this clear conflict of opinions, Reggie sought and
assembled an independent team of heart experts to consult with.
	In early June we spent several days in Southern California visiting
and being examined by this independent group of physicians. The
conclusions of these physicians, which is embodied in full and extensive
reports was that Reggie had a distinctive abnormality in the Apex region
of his heart. They felt that although this distinctive abnormality could
have caused the fainting incident, so could have the combination of
factors enunciated by Dr. Mudge.
	Since Dr. Mudge had duplicated the incident in the tilt test, Dr.
Mudge's opinion was the best guess until we were able to duplicate the
symptoms of fainting while under the stress of physical activity. Thus,
the doctors concluded, although they believed that he could eventually
return to controlled conditional competitive basketball, they did not
think he should do so until he had undergone a monitoring of his heart
function while playing competitive basketball. Reggie and I and the
advisors agreed with this direction.
	Reggie did not feel comfortable doing the competitive stress
basketball evaluation at the Celtics minicamp because of the circus
environment that it would have created so he had planned and scheduled
to do the basketball testing under the supervision of Dr. Mudge next
week in Baltimore.
	Until that time, Reggie would not and did not engage in any strenuous
competitive basketball situations. Even if cleared to play, Reggie's
advisors had decided, in conjunction with the third opinion, to allow
Reggie to play only if the Celtics provided a defibrillator machine at
all practices and games this season and provided a team cardiologist at
all practices and games.
	That meeting was to be scheduled for the week of August 10th.
Reggie's death occurred while he was shooting baskets, not exerting
energy in a competitive basketball situation. He had done the same level
of activity, which did not violate any of the doctors' opinion of safe
activity, several times recently in activities ranging from shooting
baskets to playing with our son.
	Reggie had not made his decision to return to basketball because his
testing was not complete. Reggie did everything that he could to avoid
this day ever coming. We will always love Reggie and remember him for
what he did and how he did it. He was a special basketball player, a
special friend, and special husband and would have been a special father
to both of our children.``
--
This, and all articles in this news hierarchy are Copyright 1993 by the wire 
service or information provider and licensed to Clarinet Communications 
Corp.  for distribution.  
110.138CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Fri Jul 30 1993 16:286
    Looks like Mudge ain't the jerk the media is trying to paint...
    
    Without trying to sound insensitive, it looks like Reggies number was
    up by the big guy.
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
110.139MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jul 30 1993 16:547
  I hope over-paid under-talented local sportscaster Bob Loebel feels
 pretty damned stupid about ranting and raving how Reggie should have
 gotten a third opinion now that it has been revealed that he did. Bob
 ought to stick to narrating the Friday blooper reel because whenever 
 he tries to express an opinion or do some analysis he reveals himself
 as nothing but a talking head.
110.140DECWET::METZGERHiking in Glacier National Park.Fri Jul 30 1993 17:1415
Lee,

This isn't some sprained ankle incident. Reggie fainted on the court and had a
measurably high heartbeat when brought onto the sideline. This is an athlete in
prime condition and he went unconscious. I've got enough common sense in my
little finger to say you sit out until we figure out what is wrong. The trainer
didn't need any advanced medical equipment, he needed to use his brain and
needed to develop a little backbone.

Trainers should be employed by the athletes union or some body that is
interested in looking out for the health of the players instead of by
management.

Metz
110.141it's not just a management thingPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 30 1993 17:206
110.142Any word on Matt Wenstrom?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jul 30 1993 17:308
    Anybody (Nazz?) have any idea how Matt Wenstrom did during the Celtics
    mini-camp?  I know he was there and have heard he's a real longshot.
    
    The scoop is he'll play pro ball in Europe if he doesn't stick in the
    NBA, which is highly unlikely.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
110.143ROYALT::ASHEOrdinary average guyFri Jul 30 1993 17:568
    How does this compare to say, Marty Barrett suing the Sox because the
    team doctor (and part owner) made him play before he was ready and
    maybe (in Marty's opinion) led him to early retirement?
    
    I think the trainer admits he made a mistake putting him back in.
    He came back out 2 minutes later.  They didn't let him play again
    until he was checked out.  What's the big deal?
    
110.144CAM3::WAYThe thrill of the grass...Fri Jul 30 1993 18:329
I would think that any trainer worth his stuffing, should have had the
team doctor look at him before letting him back out there.

Trainers aren't doctors, and I would think they'd pick up on the fact that
fainting is a symptom of something a little more serious -- be it heat
related or due to other things (heart conditions etc)....


'Saw
110.145CAM2::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementFri Jul 30 1993 19:3310
    Bravo, Tommy.
    
    Regarding sportswriters, did anyone see Will McDonough's column in
    today's Globe itimating that Lewis's autopsy *may* reveal drug use?
    
    Pretty bogus article.  Even if his speculation proves true, can't they
    at least wait until after the memorial service before bringing this up?
    These bozo's *have* to be the first to break a story.  Make's me sick.
    
    Mark.
110.146PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 30 1993 19:414
110.147NUMBER::DRAKEFri Jul 30 1993 20:0823
re.144 (et al)

>         <<< Note 110.144 by CAM3::WAY "The thrill of the grass..." >>>
>
>I would think that any trainer worth his stuffing, should have had the
>team doctor look at him before letting him back out there.
>
>Trainers aren't doctors, and I would think they'd pick up on the fact that
>fainting is a symptom of something a little more serious -- be it heat
>related or due to other things (heart conditions etc)....

I don't often read this conference. Just checked in to see what folks were
saying about Reggie. (By the way, like most others, I'd like to see the media
back off, at least until after the funeral. And agree with those who said
McDonough was out of line speculating about drug use, particularly when there
is no basis for such speculation).

Anyhow, to the matter at hand - before the Celtics trainer is maligned
any further (his name escapes me at the moment), I'd just like to point
out that it *was* the team doctor, Arnold Scheller, who made the call on
Reggie returning to the game after his collapse, not the trainer.

/Jim
110.148CAM3::WAYThe thrill of the grass...Fri Jul 30 1993 20:3516
>Anyhow, to the matter at hand - before the Celtics trainer is maligned
>any further (his name escapes me at the moment), I'd just like to point
>out that it *was* the team doctor, Arnold Scheller, who made the call on
>Reggie returning to the game after his collapse, not the trainer.

Not a problem, /Jim.

I never saw the game in question and was speaking from what I'd heard
in here.

I know a trainer or two, and I know they don't normally make decisions
like that, which is why I questioned it....


'Saw

110.149I'll take time off from vacation to go to the funeralTNPUBS::NAZZAROTake me for a little whileFri Jul 30 1993 20:4412
    Ed Lecerte is the team trainer.  He had no say in putting Reggie back
    into the game.  It was the team doctor, Arnie Scheller, that told
    Reggie he was OK to play in the second half.  In fact, Reggie took part
    in some kind of presentation at halftime, and he looked fine.  Little
    did we know ..............................
    
    On another matter that ACC Chris brought up.  Wenstrom sipped at
    rookie camp.  Some high school kid ate his lunch regularly, from 
    what I heard.  Perhaps he can take Gheorghe Muresan's place in the
    French league!  ;-)
    
    NAZZ
110.150SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindMon Aug 02 1993 10:5718
    In an article I read yesterday, Reggie supposedly HAD participated in
    at least one workout which was more than just a shoot-around.  He and
    another athlete ran full-court one-on-one, including a few dunks.  And,
    he was thought to have been preparing for a full-court game the very
    evening that he died.
    
    These stories were based on interviews with the players that took, or
    were to take, part in the action.
    
    It's quite possible that the truth of what medically happened to him
    may never be known.  I guess it depends on what did happen, and if that
    action is the type that leaves evidence that can be found in an
    autopsy.
    
    No matter what did happen though, the loss of a fine young man is
    indeed tragic.
    
    Lee
110.151first smile in a week in this topicCNTROL::CHILDSHow'd you get so Rude and Reckless?Mon Aug 02 1993 11:377
Nazz in case ACChris is negligant in his thanks for the Wenstrom update, let
me thank you for the both of us....

;^)

mike
110.152ROYALT::ASHEOrdinary average guyMon Aug 02 1993 16:4410
    The only thing about McDonough's column is I thought they mentioned
    around the time of the first collapse that Lewis had experimented with
    ginseng.  It's supposed to give you extra energy and if you remember,
    he came out like a house on fire that game.  Maybe that, with his
    sensitive condition led to that.  
    
    I can't see any reason for bringing up cocaine for this past week. 
    Ginseng's probably a reach.  Coke is uncalled for, especially with that
    timing..
    
110.153The guy's in love with himself...RAAJI::MORGANYou were good, Reg...Mon Aug 02 1993 17:063
    McDonough should be stroking his pen for the Enquirer.
    
    					Steve
110.154CAM3::WAYThe thrill of the grass...Mon Aug 02 1993 17:417
Reggie probably woulda got more energy out of Imus' "Vital K".....

I'm just a laymen, but it sounds to me like Reggie's ticker was ready to
quit, and it quit.....plain and simple.....


'Saw
110.155CAM3::WAYThe thrill of the grass...Mon Aug 02 1993 17:4216
btw, I don't know who did it, but on I91 North, going through the
north meadows of Hartford, there's a big green and white billboard on
the left hand side.

It says, simply:

		
		Reggie
			#35






'Saw
110.156PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Aug 02 1993 17:465
    The Baltimore Orioles and Boston Red Sox had a moment of silence for
    Reggie before Friday night's game.  Reggie was from Baltimore.  They
    showed highlights of his Celtic career on the diamond vision screen
    during the silence.  Many of the Red Sox players have `35' on the backs
    of their caps.
110.157A Weasel ColumnMPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Mon Aug 02 1993 20:1110
    The thing that bugged me the most about McDonough's column was that
    he tried to imply drug use without coming out and saying it.  He
    mentions that Reggie was questioned about drug use on more than one
    occasion.  Will then moves into questioning the "random" nature of the
    problems that Reggie had, and how it couldn't be reproduced.
    
    It was as if he wanted to point to drug use as a possible cause, but
    deny ever saying it if he ran into flack.
    
    Mike
110.158MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Aug 03 1993 16:1215
   Not being a fan of sports talk radio, I've never heard Jimmy Meyers'
  show. only seen him on the Celtics telecasts where he comes off as
  a hokey, self-promoting charlatan. Well, I taped Reggie Lewis's funeral 
  proceedings yesterday and watched them last night and wasn't I sur-
  prised that Jimmy Meyers gave a speech that made him sound like a 
  hokey, self-promoting charlatan. Basically, Jimmy said that all the
  people claiming that they will support Donna had better not turn their
  shoulders on her down the road, which in and of itself would have been
  fine. But then he went on to exercise some kind of vendetta against the
  Celtics, he berated rumor-mongers when I didn't even *know* there were
  rumors and he appointed himself "the guardian at the gate". He then 
  proceeded to recite Rudyard Kipling's most excellent poem, "If" with
  all the emoting of John Lovitz' popinjay "Master Thespian" character.
  Lighten up, Jimmy.
110.159Rat On, TommyCAPVAX::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementTue Aug 03 1993 16:373
    Master Thespian...too funny!
    
    Mark.
110.160MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Aug 03 1993 16:478

  It was really too bad that Jimmy had to come off like he did because
 the rest of the cermony was very moving and tastefully done. Especially
 nice were the shots of the crowd outside Matthews Arena and the comments
 of folks in the neighborhoods where Reggie ran youth programs. The most
 telling comment came from a young kid of about 8 years old at the YMCA
 in Roxbury who said simply, "He never forgot us. Never."
110.161PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 03 1993 16:492
    What's Jimmy going to have to beef about and drool over next season
    without Reggie around?
110.162ROYALT::ASHEGet a haircut &amp; get a real jobTue Aug 03 1993 16:525
    Kind of early to worry about that, ain't it?  And I'm not a Celts
    fan in any sense of the word.
    
    Were Reggie and Jesse Jackson close?
    
110.163VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDSgt.York,A.Murphy,RogerClemensTue Aug 03 1993 17:009
	While I don't always agree with Meyers I respect the fact that he 
says what he feels regardless of the ramifications on his career.  Most in 
the media demand someone/something to blame for a death like Reggie's, but 
the more information I get about this the more I believe you're not going 
to be able to find the bad guy to point a finger at.  The sad thing is that 
it took Reggie's death for us to see the really good things he did.  But I 
guess quiet good deeds don't make good copy.

				/Don
110.164ROYALT::ASHEGet a haircut &amp; get a real jobTue Aug 03 1993 17:046
    I admire Jimmy Myers for 1) sticking up for what he believes and 2)
    standing by his friends.  His methods aren't always the best and
    he doesn't always say what's popular.  But he does stand by what he
    says, despite what people say.  I'd rather listen to him than some
    of the "I think the Celtics walk on water, oh by the way, they're my
    boss" types they've had on there.
110.165ROYALT::ASHEGet a haircut &amp; get a real jobTue Aug 03 1993 17:066
    Hey, wait, that's not a caring sensitive side from /Don... must be to
    plug the workout video...
    
    Myers was right on one thing... at the time of his collapse, Reggie
    (the man) was underappreciated.  Not sure the player was, but the
    man was...                                   
110.166MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Tue Aug 03 1993 17:095
    I like Myers enthusiasm and knowledge.  He does speak his mind,
    which is more than can be said about Ordway.  I'd rather listen
    to him than Eddie.

    Mike
110.167From A&WCSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's gonna wear maternity clothes!Tue Aug 03 1993 17:1551
    I got this from A&W while I was away for a few days.  Here's something
    she wanted to have posted.
    
    
    
 Kev --

Could you please post this in the file for me? I'm sure there must be a
topic on this one. :-(  Also, if you could download it for me when
everyone's had a chance to chime in, I'd appreciate the opportunity to
read it all. Many thanks.

On the personal news front - the Chicago gig will end on Aug 13. I'm
taking 2 weeks of vacation after that. Next gig will probably be a
relatively short one in Mass. I'm hoping to arrange to have lunch with you
and some other folks during that vacation.

Hope that Carol's doing well. 

Alison


I listen to a radio station in Chicago which does exactly 2 minutes of
headline news at the top of the hour. Reggie's death was in that quick
blurb. Thank goodness for ESPN, where I was able to find out a little more
about what had happened. :-(

Ever since Reggie's first collapse last spring, I've been saying that he
is the only one who can decide if it is better to play for however long
God gives him, or stop and try to live longer. In the end, none of us know
when our time will be up. The best we can do is to live life as fully as
we can every single day.

I am convinced that Reggie will be missed more for what he did off the
court and the kind of person he was than for what he did on the court.
Almost no one outside of Boston knows how much he did for the community,
because he insisted on doing it so quietly. Someone recently said to me
that humility means that we don't have to be around to take any bows when
a job has been well done. That to me defines Reggie's approach to his
off-court activity - it was done with humility.

In this year when there has been so much (too much, really) loss in the
sporting communities, this one has been one of the harder ones. Some times
we're asked to look very deeply at what's important. Certainly for me,
this year has been one of those times.

May each of us find our own peace.

A&W
     
110.168Jimmy is OK - maybe...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Aug 03 1993 17:1513
I'm generally a Meyers fan.  As Walt (?) said, he speaks his mind, regardless 
of the ramifications.  I don't know if what he said was hokey.  If he is as 
close to the Lewis family as he portrays himself to be, then I beleive that 
what he said was heartfelt.  If, however, he was a hanger-on, riding an 
athlete's coat tails, then he was acting.

While the "angry young man" thing is ofter overplayed, Jimmy is consistent on
the things that he feels that way about.  He's not like Andleman, who jumps on 
something, plays it as best he can, and then drops it.  As far as the thesbian 
thing is concerned, once agian, he is consistent in gettign overly emotional 
about things, to the point of the dramatic.

=Bob=
110.169All should be judged on the truth, not on innuendo...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Aug 03 1993 17:2420
    
    The problem with this standard of "at least he speaks up for what he
    believes in" is that it's selectively enforced, generally based on whom
    one happens to agree with.  The statement is meaningless, unless it's
    backed up with some basis in fact.  I think that Dan Shaughnessy, Will 
    McDonough, Jimmy Myers, and whoever else is going to shoot from the hip 
    with thinly-veiled or even outright accusations of very damaging
    consequences have a responsibility as widely distributed journalists 
    and media personalities to provide the truth, and the facts.  Jimmy 
    Myers is no more admirable for suggesting that Dave Gavitt will have to 
    account for his wrongdoings to Reggie Lewis before God than a Celtics' 
    apologist is for saying that they can do no wrong.  There's no heroism 
    in simply being controversial.  As a matter of fact, I think that most
    of this hand-waving and finger-pointing is doing a major disservice to
    Lewis' memory, who by all accounts was not that kind of a person.  If
    Myers or anyone else has some factual basis for his accusations, let's
    see the evidence, or otherwise be held accountable.
    
    glenn
    
110.170VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDSgt.York,A.Murphy,RogerClemensTue Aug 03 1993 17:369
	Walt, one of the reasons Reggie was underappreciated was because of 
his personality.  He didn't blow his own horn, he didn't talk a lot of 
trash and consequently was ignored by the media.  What he was doesn't sell 
and that in itself speaks volumes about not only the media, but all of us.
One would like to think that yesterday's turnout at his memorial was 
because of who Reggie was and what he stood for, but the tremendous media 
coverage of his death also brought folks out.

				/Don
110.171RAAJI::MORGANYou were good, Reg...Tue Aug 03 1993 17:3826
    I don't understand this business that Bostonians didn't appreciate
    Reggie Lewis.  Jimmy Myers is an angry man with one huge chip on his
    shoulder.  He's got a 12" mouth in a 7" head and he seems to take
    too many things the wrong way.  Yesterday was not the time to proclaim
    himself "gate keeper" during a memorial service.  He turns too many
    people off, which to me should be exactly what he's trying NOT to
    accomplish.
    
    Reggie Lewis was one of the highest paid players in the NBA.  When he
    signed his last contract, he was in the top five in salary.  Obviously, 
    the Boston Celtics appreciated his basketball skills.  Did Myers really 
    think that Lewis should have received the adoration that Bird did with 
    the fans?  You just don't replace a legend one year after his retirement.  
    There isn't anybody that could have done that.
    
    Another thing is this media bashing that's taking place because we
    weren't informed about all the work Reggie had done with children.  There 
    are many players who give up much of their free time for kids.  They 
    also don't want it publicized.  We don't read about all that Tony
    Fossas does in the Hispanic community, or all the work that Rich Gedman
    has done with kids, or because I've personally seen what this guy has done, 
    Mark Fydrich.  Players don't want stuff like that splattered in the
    papers.
    
    					Steve
                                                  
110.172ROYALT::ASHEGet a haircut &amp; get a real jobTue Aug 03 1993 17:4111
    What did Gavitt or Myers say?  I missed it.  Did he think the Celts
    didn't do enough?  In terms of what?
    
    They said the decision was up to Reggie.  They would pay him if he
    never played again.  If there's more to it than that, I'd have to hear
    both sides before picking a side.  Can't criticize either until then.
    
    Like I said, even if I don't agree with something he says, I have more
    respect for him than a lot of others like Lobel, McDonough, etc...
    
    
110.173ROYALT::ASHEGet a haircut &amp; get a real jobTue Aug 03 1993 17:4714
    /Don,
    
    I understand that.  Not saying Reggie preferred it that way.  All I'm
    saying is that for all Reggie did and the way he touched people, that
    as a person, it's too bad something like this was needed to get it out
    in the open.  As a player, people did respect him, although he's not
    in the Bird category (with valid reason).  Especially with the talk of
    what kind of example a Barkley or Jordan or Tarpley or others have
    provided, it wasn't a bad idea for someone else toot his horn and I
    don't think it was that off-base.  Let's face it, the amount of
    attention Reggie got this week would have embarrassed Reggie.  He
    wasn't looking for publicity and attention.  Just wanted to know the
    good he did for this world was appreciated.
    
110.174MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Aug 03 1993 17:5114
   The highlight of the ceremony, for me, was Jim Calhoun, Reggie's college
  coach. He was visibly shaken and struggled to get through his brief moment
  on the podium. But what he said was heartfelt. He spoke about meeting this 
  skinny kid from Baltimore who could probably have gone anywhere but he came
  to Northeastern and how much joy it gave him to watch that skiiny kid grow
  into the kind of man that aby father or mother would be proud to call their
  son. It was really moving. Equally moving were other speeches by Robert
  Parish, Dennis Johnson, Reggie's cousins and his brothers. Like I said before,
  I do not listen to sports talk radio, so I'm not all that familiar with Jimmy
  Myers but even if he was completely sincere about what he was saying, and I 
  don't doubt that he was, he needn't have cast himself as the martyr or chosen
  that time to vent or have done either of those things with the theatricality 
  that he did. 
110.175SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindWed Aug 04 1993 11:0523
    I've listed to Myers quite a bit over the years, during both of his
    periods in Boston.  He's a lot better than he used to be, but I still
    don't care for him.  It's not what he's for that gets to me, it's the
    way he presents it.  His message always seems to be "I'm right, you're
    wrong.  End of discussion."  He has his mind made up before discussion,
    and he self-proclaims that he has the final word on the subject.  Not
    in all things, but in too many for me to stomach.
    
    I don't doubt for a minute that he was sincere in what he said, but his
    presentation, again, was grating and abrasive.  There are gentler ways
    of reminding people than to basically threaten them.
    
    As for Reggie's work off of the court, I agree that quite a few
    athletes prefer that it be either downplayed, or not played at all. 
    That is their personality, and it speaks volumes for their humility. 
    It is apparent that Reggie was of this ilk.  A man who cared for others
    is a fine testimony.  It's unfortunate that it took his death to bring
    this to the fore.  But, I'd bet that this is what he would have
    preferred, rather than having it publicized.  And, I also think that
    it's much more meaningful to those he touched, knowing that he did it
    because he wanted to, not just for publicity.
    
    Lee
110.176PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 04 1993 13:243
    Some of the autopsy findings have been released.  According to a news
    report I heard this morning the cause of death was enlarged heart
    tissue -- the same thing that killed Hank Gathers.
110.177autopsy reportHBAHBA::HAASLower MelvinWed Aug 04 1993 13:3235
Article: 9418
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.tw.health,clari.sports.basketball
Subject: Celtic's Lewis died of myocarditis
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 93 4:41:53 PDT
 
	BOSTON (UPI) -- An autopsy shows Boston Celtics captain Reggie Lewis
died of myocarditis, a heart abnormality that killed Loyola Marymount
basketball star Hank Gathers three years ago.
	The Boston Globe reported Wednesday the state medical examiner's
autopsy indicated Lewis suffered from an inflammation of heart muscle
tissue known as myocarditis, a disease that can produce an erratic
heartbeat, collapse and eventual death.
	The report said Lewis suffered considerable scarring of the heart,
and this scarring eventually caused the cardiac arrest that killed him
just over a week ago.
	Lewis collapsed while shooting baskets at Brandeis University in
Waltham, and was pronounced dead a short time later.
	The Globe said the autopsy report, which is expected to be released
after being given to the Lewis family, also showed there were no illegal
drugs in Lewis's system at the time of his collapse.
	Lewis, 27, had been treated for a heart condition after collapsing
during an NBA playoff game in April. One team of experts said Lewis
suffered a heart problem and should not play again, but another team
said Lewis had a benign fainting condition and could play again.
	The Celtics star was taking part in a light workout on July 27 when
he again collapsed. This time the heart attack was fatal.
	The Globe said the autopsy showed that Lewis, like other athletes
between 20 and 40, suffered from myocarditis, which can be caused by
infection from a variety of sources. Often no cause can be found, the
Globe said.
	The scarring on Lewis's heart was not readily apparent during initial
examinations, the report said.
	The medical examiner's office is waiting for more tests that could
take as much as two more weeks to be completed.
110.178ROYALT::ASHEGet a haircut &amp; get a real jobThu Aug 05 1993 20:0461
Article 9423 of clari.sports.basketball:
Xref: nntpd2.cxo.dec.com clari.local.new_england:1564 clari.tw.health:4622 clari.sports.basketball:9423
Path: nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!uunet!looking!clarinews
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.local.new_england,clari.tw.health,clari.sports.basketball
Subject: Doctor who gave Reggie Lewis OK to play speaks
Keywords: obituary, cardiovascular, health, basketball, men's professional
Message-ID: <us-lewisUR7b5_3a5@clarinet.com>
References: <us-lewisUR7c1_3lS@clarinet.com>
X-Supersedes: <us-lewisURb1d_3a5@clarinet.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 93 12:24:00 PDT
Location: new england states
ACategory: usa
Slugword: us-lewis
Priority: regular
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 376/349; Id: z3897; Sel: xbno.; Adate: 8-5-N/A; Ver: 4/2; V: 2ndld-writethru
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
Codes: &no.rxb., &nkhrxb., &skprxx., xxxxxxxx
Note: (mudge says lewis died day before monitoring plans in place)
Lines: 36

	BOSTON (UPI) -- The cardiologist who told Reggie Lewis his heart was
strong enough for him to play basketball again said Thursday the Boston
Celtics star died the day before plans for monitoring his return to the
court were finalized.
	In his first public comments since Lewis's death last week, Dr.
Gilbert Mudge, director of clinical cardiology at Brigham and Women's
Hospital in Boston, said conflicting test results and various
interpretations of the same medical data complicated the case from the
start.
	Lewis was shooting baskets during a light workout at Brandeis
University in Waltham, Mass., on July 27 when he collapsed and died.
	Results of a preliminary autopsy released Wednesday showed the
Celtics captain died of myocarditis, a heart abnormality that also
killed Loyola Marymount basketball star Hank Gathers three years ago.
	``My opinion regarding the possibility of Reggie's return to
professional basketball was always conditional and dependent upon
further testing, careful monitoring, and the progress of a planned
exercise program,'' Mudge said.
	``At the time of his death, arrangements were being made for
monitoring in accordance with my recommendations and those of our
consulting physicians,'' the doctor said.
	``He died the day before those plans were finalized.''
	Lewis, 27, collapsed during a playoff game at the Boston Garden in
April. A team of experts then told him he suffered from heart problems
and should not play again, but a medical team led by Mudge told him he
suffered from a benign fainting condition and could return to
basketball.
	``In the weeks following discharge, Reggie was followed closely. He
never violated recommendations. His complete evaluation was reviewed by
national experts and an independent panel in California. At all stages,
information received from consultants was shared with Reggie,'' Mudge
said.
	Mudge said he was ``deeply saddened'' by Lewis's death, but had
refrained from commenting until he received permission to speak from
Lewis's widow, Donna Harris Lewis.
	Mudge said he will not answer any further questions about Lewis.


    
110.179MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Aug 05 1993 20:5512
    It looks like Jimmy Myers has worn out his welcome yet again and
    will not return to 'Tics broadcasts next year. Apparently, the 
    final straw was his eulogy at Reggie's funeral (see note 110.158).
    However, methinks (and so does Jack Craig of the Boston Globe
    where I got all of this info) that the writing was on the wall
    for quite some time. The list of jobs that Jimmy has had and left
    under bad terms reads like a sportscasters wet dream - WOR in New
    York, ESPN, WBZ-TV in Boston and the Celtics job to name but four.
    Hopefully, Jimmy will some day learn to put his enormous ego aside
    and realize that moderation and discretion doesn't necessarily equate
    to playing the houseboy.
110.180GENRAL::WADEMyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWentFri Aug 06 1993 13:1117
    
    	I could be sadly mistaken here so please correct me if I'm
    	wrong.
    
    	I can recall 4 athletes *dropping dead* on the field of play.
    	I remember Hank Gathers, Flo H(can't remember the rest of her
    	last name but she played on the US volleyball team), a wide
    	receiver for Detroit(?), and of course Reggie.  In all 4
    	cases, their hearts were defective.  They were also in their
    	primes.
    
    	The other common denominator is that they were all black.  I
    	honestly can't remember any other athletes (of a different
    	race) dying like this.  Could this be genetic?  Has there
    	been any studies done to try and determine any trends?
    
    Claybone
110.181ROYALT::ASHEGet a haircut &amp; get a real jobFri Aug 06 1993 13:341
    Pete Maravich
110.182CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Fri Aug 06 1993 13:3814
re: Meyers

Jack Craig and the guy from the Herald (cain't remeber his name)  both have a 
real "in" for sports radio.  They seem to revel in their falture.  Time and 
time again Craig has speculated about moves the station will make, only to 
have them not happen.  I suspect that newspapers see sports radio stations as 
a threat, since they can deliver the news on a real time and in depth basis.

I still like Meyers, and even if his ego is an issue, at least he speaks his 
mind.  Also, unlike most of his callers, Meyers is aware that there are other 
places where thye have sports teams besides Boston, and that there are other
sports besides pro baseball, basketball and football.

=Bob=
110.183 Thanks Walt GENRAL::WADEMyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWentFri Aug 06 1993 14:074
    
    	As usual, I needed correcting.  :*)
    
    Claybone
110.184VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDVirtualValerie-ALittleBitMoreFri Aug 06 1993 14:185
    	I met Meyers this year in the Sports Cafe before a Broons game.  He
    seemed okay to me.  He went overboard with the Lewis death but that's
    Jimmy, never boring.
    
    				/Don
110.185NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Aug 06 1993 14:2720
    I don't mind Myers too much when he sticks to basketball, where he 
    appears to have considerable knowledge.  I think the guy is terrible on
    baseball with that "Red Sox Second Guess" show, though, where he has 
    basically adopted the WEEI/Eddie Anvilhead party line that the Red Sox
    "need *athletes*" and are absolutely, positively incapable of doing
    anything right, no matter what.  I've been pretty critical of Red Sox'
    management over the years myself, but at least try to have some idea of
    what I'm talking about before I fly off the handle.  With Andelman and 
    Myers, you can automatically assume that whatever the Sox try, it was 
    exactly the opposite of what they needed to do.  When you get into that 
    mode the heart might be in the right place, but you give away all 
    credibility as an *objective* sports host.  I sense that the same thing
    has happened to Myers with the Lewis tragedy, where his grief and
    frustration have gotten the better of his mind.  Frankly, if the guy
    goes, I won't miss him much, especially since his primary role is as
    host of the baseball show.
    
    glenn
       
110.186LAGUNA::MAY_BRIntel Inside, again!Fri Aug 06 1993 15:218
    
    Flo Hyman is the woman volleyball player you were trying to remember.  
    She was really the first that I can remember dying from heart problems. 
    At the time, I remember them saying that her problem was congenital,
    but seemed to happen more often in blacks.  
    
    brews
    
110.187Marfan SyndromeSALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindFri Aug 06 1993 16:313
Flo Hyman died of Marfan's Syndrome, I believe.

Lee
110.188DECWET::METZGERNon-alcoholic beer. What's the point?Fri Aug 06 1993 17:166
This weeks SI has an article on Lewis and a back page editorial. 

They stoop to inuendo about drug rumors.

Metz
110.189GENRAL::WADEMyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWentFri Aug 06 1993 19:126
    
    lEe,
    
    	What is Marfan's Syndrome?
    
    Claybone
110.190CAM3::WAYThe thrill of the grass...Fri Aug 06 1993 19:1815
>    
>    	What is Marfan's Syndrome?
>    
>    Claybone

I'm not positive, but I think it's another heart ailment.


We had a very good distance runner here in Connecticut who dropped dead
the day after she won a road race, at a family picnic.  Her heart just
stopped.  She was only 35.....


'Saw

110.191Two moreGIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Aug 06 1993 19:577
         Add the names of Alex Eldridge (UMASS Class of '78) and Arturo
    Brown (BU - early '80's) as two young black basketball players who
    died of heart problems while playing basketball.  Rick Pitino (his
    coach at the time) called Brown's death, the toughest thing he ever had
    to deal with as a coach.
    
    Russ
110.192SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindMon Aug 09 1993 10:469
    Claybone,
    
    I can't recall the details of Marfan's Syndrome, except I seem to
    recall that it's pretty much undectable.  Or at least it doesn't have
    symptoms that are readily apparent.
    
    Anyone out there have more details?
    
    Lee
110.193W/R = HughesASABET::M_BARRYMon Aug 09 1993 16:159
    
    
    The wide receiver for the Detroit Lions was named Hughes. He was white
    and died after being hit in the chest (I believe) during a pass play
    over the middle. Believe that the hit caused his aorta to rupture.
    
    He got up, took a few steps, and collapsed.
    
    
110.194ROYALT::ASHENoone loves me but my mother...Mon Aug 09 1993 16:362
    Chuck Hughes was the receiver.
    
110.195Marfan's SyndromeSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOMon Aug 09 1993 21:2127
SI did a big article on this a few years back, shortly after the deaths of
Flo and Pistol Pete.  If I recall correctly, Pete Maravich also suffered from
this sydrome unknowingly.

In short the syndrome shows itself in a weakened aorta, the largest artery in 
the body, which is attached to the heart.  The aorta's job is to channel large
quantities of oxygenated blood from the left ventricle of the heart to all 
parts of the body except the lungs.  If someone suffers from Marfan's, their
aorta can just rip, with or without other exertion.  In Flo's case, she was
just sitting on the bench.  Once ripped open, you bleed to death internally
very quickly, and your dead.  CPR won't help, nothing much will short of being
on the operating table with your chest already opened before it blows.

It's a tough one to diagnose, as people who suffer from it generally have no
chest pain or other symptoms before hand.  If discovered, there are operations
that can be done to better one's chances.

One indicator of this syndrome is the person's body.  Stretch your arms out 
to form a human 'T'.  If the measurement from the tip of one middle finger to
the other middle finger is longer than you are tall, (i.e. you're 6'2" and have
a wingspan of 6' 6") you are at a much higher risk for suffering this syndrome.

It's a rather nasty disease, and because of the body types necessary for the 
sports, it's one that happens upon bball and volleyball players more so then
hockey or baseball players.


110.196Thanks, TomSALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindTue Aug 10 1993 10:415
Ah yes, now I remember.

Good job, Tom.

Lee
110.197AKOCOA::BREENHello Warner, about that NESN subscriptionTue Aug 10 1993 17:304
    Marfan's sounds like a specific type of aortic aneurysm which are
    can be caused by different things.
    
    b
110.198CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Tue Aug 10 1993 19:141
    They think honest Abe had it too...
110.199Hungarian Hockey PlayerTRCOA::TRCP90::ahmedPolitically Incorect MessageFri Aug 13 1993 14:5211

	In Europe a hungarian (I believe) hockey player died after being hit
	
	in the chest with a light check.  The coorner said that the death

	was unrealated to the check, but the player who hit him, a Canadian,

	is being brought up on charges of manslaugeter.

	Nadeem
110.200200 snarfedFRETZ::HEISERbeat them until morale improvesMon Aug 16 1993 16:371
    Looks like the Celtics are continuing their migration to the southwest.
110.201DECWET::METZGERNon-alcoholic beer. What's the point?Mon Aug 16 1993 19:434
Are you seriously bragging about Pheonix signing Joe Klein?

Metz
110.202CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Aug 16 1993 19:484
    Yea, Kleine will definitely putteeh Suns over the top for a 
    champeenship.
    
    
110.203I never boastFRETZ::HEISERone more songMon Aug 16 1993 20:011
    I didn't see a boast in .200, did you?
110.204METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Aug 16 1993 20:027
re: .202

Bob, at least we know that you will put in a proper entry into the
Crow Cafe when the Suns don't win it all in 1994 
:-)

The Crazy Met
110.205proper is an elusive concept in hereFRETZ::HEISERone more songMon Aug 16 1993 20:371
    
110.206METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Aug 16 1993 20:539
To clarify:

Bob, at least we know that you will not wimp out when you put
an  entry into the Crow Cafe when the Suns don't win it all in 1994 

Better??

The Crazy Met
110.207objectively speaking - Suns in 94?CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Aug 16 1993 21:209
    I would swollow hard on my crow, should I make a prediction that
    does't come true.  My note, however, did not indicate that I didn't
    think the Suns would win the champeenship nexted year.  What I did
    say was that Joe Kleine would certainly not be the ingrediant that puts
    them over the top.  In fact with the same basaic team, with one more
    yer of experience, combined with the Bulls being a year olde the Suns
    te odds on favorite?
    
    =Bob=
110.208METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Aug 16 1993 21:234
Except the Bulls added Kucoc (sp?) and that could make the difference.

The Crazy Met
110.209just curiousFRETZ::HEISERone more songMon Aug 16 1993 21:232
    Bob, what would your objective opinion be when the Suns sign AC Green
    later this week?
110.210Objectively speaking of courseCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Aug 16 1993 21:315
    Well Kukoc's contract is still up in the air (no pun...), and AC Green
    would give the Suns another player with a champeenship ring - how could
    the Suns be anything but favorites...
    
    =Bob=
110.211;-)FRETZ::HEISERone more songMon Aug 16 1993 21:381
    That's what I think too.  So if you're objective, I'm proud to join ya!
110.212objectively speaking, once again...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Mon Aug 16 1993 21:527
    Mind you, I'm being an objective analyst, I'm not predicting a
    
    Kinda feel the same way about UNC.  Now wouldn't you say it woould take
    a major chokfor them not to repeat?
    
    And for that matter, doesn't  the Notre Dame football team look tough
    tised year?
110.213say it ain't soACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Tue Aug 17 1993 03:054
    Bob youze becomin' a front runner??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.214CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Tue Aug 17 1993 13:535
    No front runner here Craze.  Just tryin' to get these double-revers
    sandbaggers we see here to commit that their teams should dominate, and
    that anything else would be a chicken bone.
    
    =Bob=
110.215NOOOOSIIIRRRRREEEEE bob!CTHQ::LEARYMcSorley,McFilthy,McNastyTue Aug 17 1993 14:161
    
110.216POWDML::SGOLDSMITHTue Aug 17 1993 14:357
    The Suns are doomed now.  Joe Klein and Tom Kite are in the same
    category.  They are very heavy weights for any team to cart around.  
    Neither Orlando or Phoenix will be able to win a championship with
    either of these guys on their team.  The Celtics are looking better
    already.
    
    Steve
110.217ROYALT::ASHEEverybody hurts... sometimes...Tue Aug 17 1993 14:362
    I'd guess Greg Kite would be up there too...
    
110.218POWDML::SGOLDSMITHTue Aug 17 1993 14:404
    Or maybe Greg Kite.  I suppose Tom Kite probably would be a bit more of
    a drag...
    
    Oops.
110.219CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is one year old!!!Thu Nov 18 1993 14:1133
Wail, I went to the gloppy Garden to my firsted Celtics game 
in two seasons lasted night (vs. Joisey).  Here are some thoughts:

 o The yuppy crowd is still there, maybe not in the numbers of 
   past years.  We had excellent seats in the loge, six rows up
   and the people next to us showed up at the start of the second
   quarter, and left at HALFTIME!  Here I was sitting in the best 
   seats that I have ever had for a sporting event, and these 
   schmucks are only there for one quarter.  Meanwhile, the row 
   in front of us was occupied by a flock of guys in suits so
   expensive, Mike Leary would have looked like a pauper.  These
   guys at least stayed for the whole game, but their entire 
   evening was spent chatting about their lates clients, not 
   basketball.  I almost asked one of them why they bother to 
   come, but stopped myself.

 o Derrick Coleman is the real thing, Kenny Anderson is good, but
   the rest of the Nets are pretty clueless.  The one guy I 
   expected more from was Armon Gilliam, but he seemed to be
   sleepwalking.  They truely miss Petrovich.

 o Robert Parrish is incredible.  I realize he was playing against
   Benoit Benjamin and Dwayne Schintzus (talk about a waste of 
   skin), but notbody could stop him early on.  Dina Radja can play
   too but seems pretty deliberate in his moves.

 o The Celtics played good team defense.  (B)Rick Fox remains lost
   on offense, but he held his own on D.

 o The Boston Garden is a disgusting old, ugly building, and I 
   won't miss it at all.

=Bob=
110.220double ouchCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Nov 18 1993 14:1410
    Great picture on the back page of the Boston Herald.
    
    Derrick Coleman committing a vewy personal foul on Robert Parish.
    And I do mean personal!!
    
    Robert is mouthing "SHHHEEEEEEIIIIT"
    
    8^)
    MikeL
    
110.221Gillium is the worst!!NEMAIL::LONDONMon Nov 29 1993 15:542
    How could you expect more from Gillium?  He is absolutely HORRIBLE!!!!
    
110.222TNPUBS::ALVEYPoofter's Froth, Wyoming plans aheadThu Dec 09 1993 18:318
Hey NAZZ,
How come the NBA lets S. Bradley wear no. 76
and Georges Mureson 77?
Do both officials have to signal to you simultaneously?

inquiring mind, 
dr.a
110.22391 inches of uglyTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Dec 10 1993 13:399
    There used to be a rule that said the highest number anyone could wear
    was 55, so's that the refs could clearly signal the number of the
    player who committed the foul.  I guess they don't have that rule any
    more.
    
    I used to think that the shorter the guy, the uglier he was (no offense
    Kev), but Muresan sure proves that the opposite is true.
    
    NAZZ
110.224CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Dec 10 1993 13:429
>    There used to be a rule that said the highest number anyone could wear
>    was 55, so's that the refs could clearly signal the number of the
>    player who committed the foul.  I guess they don't have that rule any
>    more.
    
I was under the impression that the 55 rule was just a college rule, but
I could be wrong.

'Saw
110.225GWEN::ASHEI ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk...Fri Dec 10 1993 13:532
    Ex. Cowens, Havlicek...
    
110.226CNTROL::CHILDSJ. Elders, you got it RIGHT Babeee!!Fri Dec 10 1993 15:355
  Think NBA Marketing had anyhting to do witht the change in the 55 rule?

 mike   

110.227Dino makin' some noiseFRETZ::HEISERno I'm really very, very shyFri Dec 10 1993 15:382
    So what does everyone think about Dino Radja for ROY?  I heard a writer
    from Philly say that, thus far, he's got his vote.
110.228GWEN::ASHEI ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk...Fri Dec 10 1993 16:332
    Probably the same reason the Canadien's numbers are all in the 40's...
    
110.229PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Dec 10 1993 16:503
110.230CELTS SCORE NEEDEDAKOCOA::CJACQUESCrazy ways are evidentMon Jan 03 1994 17:575
    Can anyone give me the EXACT score of the Celtics game on
    Thursday - 12/30/93.
    
    					Thanks
    					  cj
110.231At my peril - An ACC-Chris special Wenstrom updateAKOCOA::BREENMon Jan 10 1994 20:4717
    Ford is quoted in today's herald as 
    
    "If Wenstrom can get me rebounds I'm going with Wenstrom"
    
    I had a feeling awhile back that Ford might be dying to try Wenstrom in
    realtime as Acie seems more and more a project like croat #1 (in fact
    Croat #2 - Dino Radja has been benched along with Pinckney for Fox and
    another (Gamble?).
    
    This may be a classic case of keeping a guy on the bench because guy #1
    has a big contract.
    
    The only qualifier I have about my feeling about Wenstrom as a sleeper
    is I personally haven't seen him play but then again who has except
    apparently Sat. nite when he got more than his allotted 2.
    
    Montross of all people was high on Wenstrom.
110.232Bottom line: The C's are hurting big-time.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Jan 10 1994 22:4122
    Funny the subject of Wenstrom should come up, cause he was just
    featured on The Dean Smith show tonight.  Apparently Matt is within
    days of getting his guaranteed money for the year, and based on the
    comments I'm reading, that appears to be a done deal now.  (i.e. he may
    be playing more in the near-term)
    
    The thing to realize about Matt is that:
    
    A) He was highly recruited out of HS (McDonald's AA)
    B) He's not as good as Montross or Salvadori, but both of them are 
       projected 1st-rounders.  Some scouts think Salvadori may end up
       being a better pro than Eric.  I've head Montross compared
       favorably with Joe Kleine, who had a long and prosperous NBA
       career.
    C) Wenstrom is a nice guy to have fill out your roster, cause he's
       a hustler who'll put out at practice and not complain.
    
    Dean was gushing about him today as a kid who made *huge* sacrifices
    for the good of the team, and he thinks he'll be a pro for a long time.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
110.233GWEN::ASHEDetriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. ChampsTue Jan 11 1994 00:172
    The deadline was last week..
    
110.234MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Tue Jan 11 1994 02:528
    re: title of note .232
    
    Couldn't happen to a nicer team. NOT!
    
    It is so good to hear comparisons to Curtis Rowe and Sidney Wick.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.235Shoes on the other footKALI::MORGANTue Jan 11 1994 11:326
    Crazy, didn't I just read something in another note about Bostonians
    having an inferiority complex?  Well the Celtics have apparently been
    a nightmare to you and many of the other "cardboard people" that attend
    Knicks games these days.
    
    					Steve
110.236PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 12:286
110.237PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 12:326
110.238Mac, I stand correctedAKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 11 1994 12:374
    Yes, Radja and Fox.
    
    Croat #1 was that center who sat on the bench two years ago.  Or was he
    another yugo nationality.?
110.239What's wrong with Joe Kleine?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Jan 11 1994 12:431
    
110.240PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 12:443
110.241If expecting the 2nd coming of Shaq, you'll be disapointed.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Jan 11 1994 14:167
    > He's a journeyman backup center/forward at best
    
    who's had a long and lucrative NBA career and is no_doubt a
    millionaire.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
110.242Sherman Douglas: great stats, lousy playerTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthTue Jan 11 1994 14:1817
    Stoyko Vrankovic.  A terrible basketball player.
    
    I've heard Montross compared more to another former Celtics center,
    Greg Kite.  Long and undistinguished pro career.  Sits picks, commits
    fouls, grabs some rebounds.  Joe Kleine has a very smooth 16-20' jump
    shot that Montross can only dream about.
    
    As for the Celtics, SHERMAN DOUGLAS MUST GO!!!!!  HE IS AN INCREDIBLE
    LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  NOTHING HAS GONE RIGHT SINCE GAVITT TRADED FOR
    HIM!!!!!!  
    
    Speaking of Gavitt, I am still waiting for him to make his first
    positive move as Head of Basketball Operations, or whatever his title
    is now.  Drafting Jon Barry instead of Oliver Miller was certainly a
    gem of a move!  :-(
    
    NAZZ
110.243PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 15:0210
110.244Montross will max his potential though, thanks to Dean. :^)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Jan 11 1994 19:105
    Mac, there's absolutely no way I ever compared Montross to Shaq.  None. 
    Zero.  Zilch.  Nada.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
110.245PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 19:257
110.246GWEN::ASHEDetriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. ChampsTue Jan 11 1994 19:492
    Put it in his envelope when he gets around to sending it...
    
110.247btw thanks for the printer info METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 11 1994 19:563
Walt, are you all confused on where to post your replies?

The Crazy Met
110.248GWEN::ASHEDetriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. ChampsTue Jan 11 1994 20:362
    Oops... must have done a next unseen...
    
110.249Mainly about Vin Baker snubAKOCOA::BREENMon Jan 17 1994 17:1411
    as per Nazz's <sic> note is it a coincidence that Celtic's losing
    streaks stopped with Shoeless Douglas' absence?
    
    Also, Vin Baker has been ceremoniously NOT selected to the rookie all
    star game.  He would probably be in the top 3 of roy balloting by nba
    cognescenti?  Any nba-c types in here?
    
    I have noticed Vin averaging about 35mins per game for bucks. Okay,
    maybe #4 after Webber,Hardaway and Mashburn.
    
    Rodney Rogers as predicted in sprots is also not on rookie team.
110.250GWEN::ASHEThank you Dr. King.Mon Jan 17 1994 18:5618
    I wouldn't put him in the top 3... Who got named to it?
    at forwards, I'd put Mashburn, Webber, Radja, Rider and
    maybe Jones ahead of him.
    
    
    Hardaway 13.8 ppg 4.9 rpg 5.6 apg
    Radja 13.7 ppg 7.5 rpg, 1.0 bpg
    Bradley 9.3 ppg 6.1 rpg, 3.1 bpg
    Hunter 10.3 ppg, 3.8 apg, 2.2 rpg
    Mills (CLE) 10.1 ppg 3.8 rpg, .6bpg
    Baker 8.3 ppg 5 rpg 1.3 bpg 
    Cheaney 8.2 ppg 1.5 apg, 2.3 rpg
    
    Mashburn 20.6 ppg 5.5 rpg, 2.9 apg
    Webber 16.4 ppg, 9.2 rpg, 3.8 apg
    Rider 13.9 ppg 3rpg, 2.2 apg
    Van Exel 11.2 ppg 5.9 apg, 2.9 rpg
    Jones (DAL) 7.0 ppg, 8.9 rpg, 1.9 apg
110.251Instead of stats someone should watch a game sometimeAKOCOA::BREENMon Jan 17 1994 20:158
    They must be going on those stats you've provided instead of first hand
    information since in the last 2-3 weeks Baker has been averaging about
    15 points and 8 rebounds / game.
    
    Hopefully Boston will play 'kee and we can all lick our chops at the
    hopeless possiblity that a Radja for Baker trade could be engineered.
    
    I find Dino makes even Larry Bird look speedy
110.252GWEN::ASHEThank you Dr. King.Mon Jan 17 1994 20:286
    1) You started the stat talk by talking about minutes
    2) You can't make a guy an all-star by 2 weeks worth of play.
    3) If you don't like Dino and think Baker has more talent, why would
       Milwaukee make a deal.  Especially since they made more room for
       him by dealing Avent this past weekend. (See some people do pay
       attention).
110.253Yeh, I'm just looking at Baker Right nowAKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 18 1994 15:0114
    Well, Baker appears to be one of the top rookies in an excellent rookie
    class and I was shocked that he wasn't even selected for the all-star
    game.  I personnally have only briefly seen him on a new clip, mea
    culpa but when he starts playing 35 minutes a game someone thinks he's
    pretty good.
    
    Actually I don't completely understand this rookie all-star game
    anyway.  Is it supposed to be east-west, 10 rookies per side or are the
    10 rookies playing someone else?
    
    No, Milwaukee would never make the deal and the Celts would in an
    instant (Baker for Radja).
    
    Billb 
110.254DOCTP::TESSIERTue Jan 18 1994 15:195
16 rookies total.  8 to a side.  No east-west.  Somehow they
divide up the players without regard to conference.  Two 15-minute
halves.

Ken
110.255CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Jan 18 1994 15:247
Vin Baker out of U-Hahahahah.... (that's how we lovingly refer to
University of Hartford)....

Glad to see he's doing so well.....


'Saw
110.256PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 18 1994 15:308
110.257When's Baker going to be on TV?AKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 18 1994 19:4814
    Tony Pena defies comparison with any normal situation; the only thing
    comparable was Wilt Chamberlain and his .40 free throw percentage.
    
    My original point was that the selection should have been made
    according to how each rookie was playing asof January 10th not October
    10th or whenever.
    
    Milwaukee let her veterans play themselves out of a job and then let
    Baker win it, he did and he is on his way to serious roy contention.
    
    Unless his Hartford (U.) (read no big rep.) is killing him.
    
    Perhaps there is someone in this note who actually follows pro ball that
    has had chance to see the various rookies in action and can comment.
110.258Danny Ainge's Top 10 Reasons Why McHale retiredFRETZ::HEISERMost Objective Analyst(tm)Tue Feb 01 1994 16:3522
    10. He realized how goofy he looks in tank tops and shorts.
    
    9. Forced out for repeatedly calling David Stern while thinking he was
    talking to Howard Stern.
    
    8. To spend more time drinking beer with Norm and Cliff.
    
    7. He didn't understand why they named the floor of Boston Garden after
    a margarine.
    
    6. That damn Clinton income-tax hike.
    
    5. Had trouble reading the scoreboard from the bench.
    
    4. 13 years of chaffing and itching.
    
    3. Never learned to speak jive.
    
    2. Lost his job to Darren Morningstar and Marcus Webb.
    
    1. With his kids on the sidelilne, chants of "McHale sucks!" replaced
    by chants of "Dad sucks!"
110.259Guess you had to be thereCAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementWed Feb 02 1994 01:469
    Loved Ainge's comments about McHale: (paraphrased)
    
    "Kevin didn't really look all that much like Herman Munster, but when
    golfing, we would hide beneath his forehead during a rain shower."
    
    "When Kevin had knee surgery, they couldn't find any screws long enough
    until they pulled one from the side of his neck."
    
    Mark.
110.260Ainge is still a Celtic at heartFRETZ::HEISERgimme a dollar or gimme 50 centsWed Feb 02 1994 14:142
    yeah, Ainge is pretty funny.  They showed clips of most of his roast
    segment on the Charles Barkley show.  Looked like it was a great time.
110.261It was lights out early - let's hit the 6's last nightAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billWed Feb 02 1994 20:5922
    That was pretty painful to see last night, on the rare occassion of my
    getting to watch a little.
    
    Radja - Professional moves, nice shot all the right tools to be a top
    notch European player but slow and situated (as in one spot).  Not much
    on the boards.  Not a power forward, not a small forward, not
    
    Sherman -  Why does he always use two handed pass.  Cousy in 10 years
    never once made a two handed pass.
    
    Fox - Finally come around.  Could help any team.  Will get better.
    
    Dee - I'd keep him.  Must shoot consistently.
    
    Parrish - Makes an early decision on whether team has come to play. 
    Was willing to make the sacrifice but not alone.  He has to pace
    himself for long season but the rest have no excuse.  Then again Dee
    and Douglas are putting in a lot of minutes.
    
    NY jumped all over C's when Mason and Anthony came in.
    
    
110.262Acey Ducy?BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Feb 02 1994 21:406

	does Acie Earl (from Iowa) ever get any playing time?  Is he being
	"groomed" or is he a stiff?

	Kevin (Iowa City born)
110.263from the rumor millFRETZ::HEISERtragically coolWed Feb 02 1994 22:023
    fwiw: Trey Bender (Gary Bender's son) who works for the Phoenix version 
    of WFAN, says his latest scoop is Danny Manning going to the
    Celtics.
110.264what would the celts give in return-the whole team???SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedWed Feb 02 1994 23:284
    I think that rumor started a couple of years ago. You mean its still a
    rumor???
    
                stig
110.265CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 03 1994 11:408
Manning is an unrestricked free agent at the end of the year and can go 
wherever he wants without compensation.....

Sherm Douglas is John Bagley in a smaller body...one minute you love him
next you want to shoot him....

mikey 
110.266Acie EarlAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billThu Feb 03 1994 12:0222
    Kevin,
    	Right now Acie is a "stiff" but I don't think Celts have given up
    completely on him.  However, Celtic style is to point out the
    fundemental flaws and expect the player to overcome them.  Acie has to
    now, first prove it in practice and then in games.
    
    	Biggest flaw.  Speed and mobility.  Earl just can't make it down
    the court.
    
    	Second is the fact he is labeled low caste rookie in the ref's
    pecking order; I and others have expounded on this but Earl's stronger
    points, back to the basket play (perhaps) are impossible until he
    achieves some nba "status".
    
    	The big battle as I see it is Ford wants to go with Wenstrom but
    Gavitt is telling him its Earl or no one.  Ford has has Pinckney
    (injuered lateley), Radja and others spelling Parrish and the latter
    doing 35+ minutes.
    
    Bill  
    
    btw , Walt D called the other night and says hi
110.267Manning always was partial to BostonFRETZ::HEISERtragically coolThu Feb 03 1994 14:051
    According to Bender's sources, it's practically a done deal.
110.268HANNAH::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatMon Feb 07 1994 20:012
    Walt D what?
    
110.269SWAM2::MASSEY_VIA foot in the door is all I need.Mon Feb 07 1994 21:193
    Walt!! how did you escape...I mean, you're back!!
    
    Gin
110.270HANNAH::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatTue Feb 08 1994 02:001
    Must have been while you were moving to your new job...
110.271CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 17 1994 14:0413
but who's going to trade for him =Bob=, when they know all they have to do
is wait until the year is over than make him an offer and not owe the
Clippers any compensation. Only a team who has a real chance at the champion-
ship and feels Danny is the missing piece would make a trade for him now.
Also throw in the fact that if they do trade for him, they'd still have to
sign him up for a long term contract after that or risk loosing him after
the season ends, I don't see anybody out there taking that gamble. Maybe
the Knicks who having been trying to buy their way to the championship
the last few years might gamble and maybe the Rockets. Suns would but
they already have Chuckie at that posistion....

mike
110.272METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseThu Feb 17 1994 14:434
Celtics: how are they wrt the salary cap next year? Manning will cost a
bundle.

The Crazy Met
110.272FRETZ::HEISERask me about my vow of silenceThu Feb 17 1994 15:075
110.273CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 17 1994 15:574
 they're over. they'd have to make a few moves to free some cash....

 mike
110.27438346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 16:023
    Are you sure, Mike?  They only have a few players signed through next
    year, McHale is gone, Bird is gone, and Parish is in the last year of
    his contract.
110.275MKFSA::LONG6 more months and he's all yoursThu Feb 17 1994 16:045
	Mac, I seem to recall something about Reggie Lewis' contract
	being the residual thorn for the Celts.


	billl
110.276DZIGN::ROBICHAUDTonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkankThu Feb 17 1994 17:121
    	Billl's right, Reggis Lewis' salary counts against the cap.
110.27738346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 17:242
    I know that, but there are several other salaries that won't after this
    year.
110.278don't spend it all in one placeFRETZ::HEISERask me about my vow of silenceThu Feb 17 1994 17:363
    I just hope they don't toss all their available dough at Manning (or
    some All-Star equivalent).  They still have to pursue some talent/depth
    at other key positions.
110.279Off the top of my headTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeThu Feb 17 1994 18:0919
    For next year, still on the books for the Celtics:
    
    Reggie Lewis:  two years left, $3.5 million, $3.7 million
    Sherman Douglas:  four years left, $3.1, $3.4, $3.6, and $4.0!!!!!!!
    Xavier McDaniel:  two years, $2.8 and #3.0
    Ed Pinckney: one year at $1.6
    Dino Radja:  one year at $2.2
    Acie Earl:  one or two years, don't know how much
    
    Fox, Brown, Abdelnaby and Corchiani are restricted free agents.
    Parish and Gamble are unrestricted free agents.
    
    Don't know status of Oliver and Wenstrom, as if it matters.
    
    Having to pay Sherman all that money for such a long time makes the
    deal to get him the worst trade in Celtics history.
    
    NAZZ
    
110.280METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseThu Feb 17 1994 18:196
That is 11.2 + Earl?? Which gives them 2+ or is it 3-4+?

They could pull a deal like Portlant did with Dudley. Acutally after that
deal was upheld, the cap is a joke.

The Crazy Met
110.281It all hinges on what they do with the ChiefTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeThu Feb 17 1994 18:254
    So, if they don't re-sign Parish, they'll be under the cap.  If they do
    sign him, they'll be over.
    
    NAZZ
110.282something doesn't sound rightMETSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 17:587
Heard on the radio this morning that after last nights lost the Celtics
have clinched a losing home record for the first time in 25 years. That
would have been the 1968-69 team? Didn't that team win the NBA title?
What was the home record of the 1978-79 and 1979-80 teams??

The Crazy Met

110.283glad to see the healing process beginFRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 17:591
    TCM, kudos for confessing Celtic greatness.
110.284BILL RUSSELL for you youngins out thereCNTROL::CHILDSbreakin' rocks, in the hot sunThu Mar 31 1994 18:015
 it was 69-70 team the first year after the greatest player EVER retired,
 that set the loosing record at home.......

 mike
110.285METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 18:027
MikeH

I expected that a Celtic fan like you would have these answers immediately
available - or are you not a fan in years that they play badly??? 

The Crazy Met

110.286TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Mar 31 1994 18:2914
    
>What was the home record of the 1978-79 and 1979-80 teams??
    
    78-79 == 21-20
    79-80 == 35-6 (They was terrible that year, eh!!!)  :-)
    
    
    JimH
    
    BTW, in 77-78 they were 24-17, which was one of the year you probably 
    meant to ask about....
    
    
    
110.287METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 18:354
Yeah the other year I wanted to know about was 77-78.

The Crazy Met

110.288:-pFRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 19:015
>I expected that a Celtic fan like you would have these answers immediately
>available - or are you not a fan in years that they play badly??? 
    
    I was only 7 years old then, but I still had my Converse Bob Cousy
    shoes!
110.289only 1 lossFRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 19:072
    I think the '86 home record is the standard that all teams are judged
    by.
110.290METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 19:096
Was that the 41-1 record??

Who did they lose to??

The Crazy Met

110.291FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 19:103
    I can't remember who, but I recall it being in the first month or two
    of the season.  From January thru the Championship, they were
    undefeated at home.
110.292METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 19:114
did they lose to the Lakers at home on the Finals?

The Crazy Met

110.293those were the daysFRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 19:152
    Nope, the Lakers choked to Houston in the Western Conference finals
    that year and saved themselves a royal butt-whippin!
110.294cool stuffFRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 19:173
    BTW - I have the Bird/Auerbach tape on winning basketball.  Some
    excellent footage in there as well as clinics by all starters (+Walton)
    from the '86 team.
110.295Those were the good old daysTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Thu Mar 31 1994 19:317
    The Celtics lost in early December to Portland by close to 20 points
    for their only loss of the 1985-86 season.  The following year they
    only lost once at the Garden during the regular season but also lost a
    home game in Hartford to Washington to finish with a 39-2 regular
    season home record.
    
    NAZZ
110.296METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 19:499
re: good old days

that is a matter of perspective.

How good a team was Portland that year??


The Crazy Met

110.297They asked me not to return...SALEM::DODATied to the whippin' postThu Mar 31 1994 19:493
The only game I went to that year....

daryll
110.298METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 19:518
re: .297

you mean you actually managed to get a ticket with all the yuppie and yuppie
wannabes paying outrageous sums of money for tickets that year, even against
teams like the Clippers??

The Crazy Met

110.299PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 31 1994 19:582
    A Knicks fan complaining about the Celtic fans.  That's a riot.  Too
    bad Tommy's not here to put him in his place.
110.300MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 31 1994 20:0312
    >> you mean you actually managed to get a ticket with all the yuppie 
    >> and yuppie wannabes paying outrageous sums of money for tickets 
    >> that year, even against teams like the Clippers??

        I'd rag on all the yuppies at MSG but they don't show up until
        playoff time. Right now, with a metropolitan area of roughly
        16 million people and a decent team, you could still probably 
        buy seats the day of the game. And its not like there's the 
        excuse of the stadium being life threatening like Yankee Stadium 
        or Shea.
    
110.301METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 20:089
> Right now, with a metropolitan area of roughly
> 16 million people and a decent team, you could still probably
> buy seats the day of the game.

I was hoping you would say that. Knicks games are sold out for the 
rest of the season.

The Crazy Met

110.302MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 31 1994 20:1410
 >> I was hoping you would say that. Knicks games are sold out for the 
 >> rest of the season.

    Did they ease the dress code? Now they let you in with an off-the-rack
    suit? It couldn't be that the Knicks are in first place in the Eastern 
    Conference. Maybe it's just time for the Knicks to rack up one of those 
    30 game sellout streaks that the New York announcers point to with so much 
    pride.
    
110.303NY should be ashamedFRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 20:202
    The entire Phoenix metro area has less than 3M, yet the Suns have been
    sold out for 5+ years running.
110.304PTOVAX::JACOBI've got to crack this ice and flyThu Mar 31 1994 20:219
    
    >>The entire Phoenix metro area has less than 3M, yet the Suns have been
    >>sold out for 5+ years running.
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Take some Kaopectate fer that, and quit drinking the water.
    
    JaKe
    
110.305FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 20:245
    >    Take some Kaopectate fer that, and quit drinking the water.
    
    Sorry Jake, but you only need a cork for that here.  The real bad water
    doesn't start until you hit Tucson (northern Nogales).  In fact it is
    centered around Nogales Tech (the final 4 team's school).
110.306oh, jeans are allowed-they would even let Tommy inMETSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 20:3110
Keep going Tommy. Knicks have sold out 63 straight games.

So whats your next line gonna be, this is fun.

The Crazy Met

re: phoenix

yabbut there isn't a whole lot to do in Phoenix.

110.307DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFigureSkating,Iditarod,Pro'RasslinThu Mar 31 1994 20:394
    	Please take this discussion about the bandwagon jumping Knick
    fans to an appropriate place, like the JUNK NOTE.
    
    				  /Don
110.308it's payback timeMETSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 20:4411
/er does it hit too close to home to have that discussion in this note???

So it isn't fun being on the other side of things?? like last second foul
calls against the Celtics, blowing last minute leads, seeing how transient 
the fan base is. The shoe is on the other foot now.

Hopefully you will have a looooong time to get used to it.

The Crazy Met

110.309lots of concerts too - your excuse is invalidFRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 21:028
    >yabbut there isn't a whole lot to do in Phoenix.
    
    TCM, obviously you haven't been here in a long time or you're a hermit. 
    Wintertime is the best time to be here and is also basketball season. 
    You have some of the best golf courses in the country, NASCAR & Indy
    racing, NCAA (PAC-10) football and basketball, Phoenix Roadrunners, 
    Phoenix Cardinals, sightseeing, not to mention the Planet Hollywood that 
    just opened and the Hard Rock Cafe that will open next month.
110.310SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dThu Mar 31 1994 21:056
    
    So tell me, TCM, when's the last time these 'great' Knick teams sold
    out every game of a losing season?  A staunch Knick fan like yourself
    must have the answer to that right at your finger tips.
    
    brews
110.311Arizona golf and accomadations tres cher?AKOCOA::BREENTill Time Shall be no MoreThu Mar 31 1994 21:205
    I noticed many golf ads in Golf Digest (Hogan Secret issue) but am of
    the impression that Arizona is somewhat pricey.  Especially since in
    the same issue was mississippi,Alabama and northwest Fla with many
    excellent buys.
    
110.312FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 21:296
    >                 -< Arizona golf and accomadations tres cher? >-
    
    All the hotels & courses raise their winter rates to milk the
    snowbirds.  Rooms at the Pointe resort that are $200+/night
    in the winter are around $60/night in the summer.  This isn't a place
    people are dying to come to in the summer.
110.313SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dThu Mar 31 1994 21:309
    >I noticed many golf ads in Golf Digest (Hogan Secret issue) but am of   
    >the impression that Arizona is somewhat pricey.  Especially since in   
    
    Tell me about it!  Starting tomorrow, the prices drop and we locals can
    play.  A course that goes for $25 in the summer goes for $100 in March. 
    If you do decide to come doown this way, I'll put you up at my house,
    though.  All the amentities, but I ain't heatin' up the pool for ya.
    
    brews
110.314MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 22:136
    re: .losing season
    
    never; how's that for an honest answer.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.315DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFreeMorningGuyTye!Fri Apr 01 1994 15:447
    	Hey Craze, I've seen enough World Championships in my lifetime
    that I don't suffer from "banner envy".  Obviously that 2TitleDynasty
    of the 70's doesn't quite fill the void for Knickerbocker fans and
    still leaves them with feelings of inadequacy.  I say be satisfied
    with what you got.
    
    				/Don
110.316FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantFri Apr 01 1994 16:461
    Larry Bird has just been made the new coach of the Celtics.
110.317WOW!!!!ROCK::MURPHYI love Big East BasketballFri Apr 01 1994 18:143
    Nice Try.
    Murph
    
110.318TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu Apr 07 1994 13:019
Are these guys tanking or what?  How else would you explain having 
a power forward handling the ball with the game in the balance?

Three (?) point game vs. the Hawks, last posession lasted night. Celtics have no
TO's, inbound to Dino Radja.  Dino dribbles past mid court, gets to the top of
the key, three defenders converge.  There goes the ball, there goes the game,
there goes another step towards a better lottery pick.

If only they hadn't won so many games early in the season...
110.319CNTROL::CHILDSbreakin' rocks, in the hot sunThu Apr 07 1994 13:065
=Bob=, don't worry about those early season wins, I have faith in Stern and
Co. to get us into the top three.........

mike
110.320DZIGN::ROBICHAUDI'mALoserBaby,SoWhyDon'tYouKillMeThu Apr 07 1994 16:286
110.321Collins on BostonFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixFri Apr 15 1994 17:3923
I thought I'd enter this for information's sake.  He basically analyzed the top
11 of each conference.  

Why they'll get there
----------------------
Strength in numbers.  The rapid development of rookie Dino Radja gives coach
Chris Ford no fewer than 9 players of proven talent.

Why they won't
--------------
Boston lacks strong rebounders, especially on offense.  With so few second
shots, the Celtics go to the line less than any other playoff contender.

X-factor
--------
Six Celtics were averaging in double figures in the regular season, but none of
them can be considered a big-time scorer.  Can Dee Brown, Kevin Gamble, and
Xavier McDaniel pick up the pace?

Player on the spot
------------------
Robert Parish.  When the Chief plays well, so do the Celtics.  But who knows how
fresh his 40-year-old legs will be for the postseason?
110.322METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Apr 15 1994 17:424
when did Collins make these analyses??

The Crazy Met

110.323FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixFri Apr 15 1994 17:552
    It's from the May issue of "Inside Sports" so they're probably at least
    2 months old.
110.324the important raceFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixWed Apr 20 1994 22:1615
                                 No. 1  Top 3
Pos Team            W   L   Pct  Pick   Pick   Number of combinations 
 1  Dallas          11  68  .139 25.00  64.84        250
 2  Milwaukee       19  60  .241 20.30  57.10        203
 3  Minnesota       20  59  .253 16.20  48.47        162
 4  Detroit         20  59  .253 12.60  40.02        126
 5  Washington      23  56  .291  9.40  31.18         94
 6  Philadelphia    24  55  .304  6.60  22.68         66
 7  L.A. Clippers   27  52  .342  4.40  15.51         44
 8  Sacramento      27  52  .342  2.70   9.70         27
 9  Boston          31  48  .392  1.50   5.46         15
10  L.A. Lakers     33  46  .418  0.80   2.94          8
11  Charlotte       38  40  .487  0.50   1.84          5
========================================================
    Miami           41  39  .513 
110.325MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Wed Apr 20 1994 22:234
    Come on Boston, you can still have a better record than the Lakers.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.326HANNAH::ASHEThanks Zeke...Wed Apr 20 1994 23:402
    Why is Minnesota ahead of Detriot(tm)?
    
110.327DZIGN::ROBICHAUDSoLong00-SeeYouInTheRaftersFri Apr 22 1994 12:334
    	Thanks for all the memories Robert, but especially the one of
    you pummelling that whiney-faced Piston into the parquet.
    
    				  /Don
110.328CAMONE::WAYSnake and NapeFri Apr 22 1994 12:527
>    	Thanks for all the memories Robert, but especially the one of
>    you pummelling that whiney-faced Piston into the parquet.
    
On Patriots Day, the guys on Imus were saying that Crispus Attucks was
playing center for the Celtics the night before. 

I'll miss ol' Robert too....
110.329MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Apr 22 1994 14:244
    And one more time this season. Go Celtics - beat the Bulls!!!!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.330need helpHBAHBA::HAASSaturn sheetsFri Apr 22 1994 14:2912
>    	Thanks for all the memories Robert, but especially the one of
>    you pummelling that whiney-faced Piston into the parquet.

Zo looked like he felt bad about beating poor Robert. The question that
begs is not so much what he will do but what the hail are the Celtics
gonna do to at least get back to being competitive. They're not only a
long way from winning anything, they're a long way from getting close.

It's not just them. The powers of the 80s - Lakers, Celtics, Pistons -
all have fallen on real hard times.

TTom
110.331CAMONE::WAYSnake and NapeFri Apr 22 1994 14:375
We talked about this on Patriots Day.

Look for the Celtics to go for Eric Montross or Cherokee Parks.

He kind of fits their complexion, if you get my drift.....
110.332Douglas?HBAHBA::HAASSaturn sheetsFri Apr 22 1994 14:448
>Look for the Celtics to go for Eric Montross or Cherokee Parks.

If'n Montross comes in for the Chief, the Celtics would actually lose
some team speed.

BTW, where was The General Sherman lasted night?

TTom
110.333C's racism pure hogwash: now Sox, I'll listenAKOCOA::BREENFri Apr 22 1994 15:2613
    That black-white thing about the celtics is pure bull.
    
    Yes, they draft poorly and have a bad habit from their habitual poor
    draft positions of taking long shots.  Red still thinks he's much
    smarter than the rest like he once was.
    
    If Yinka Dare was available he'd grab him in a minute.
    
    They have enough weaknesses that they may just go for a good player
    regardless of position (and certainly of color).
    
    As a sleeper I like Wingfield of Cinnci but Cs are too low for him but
    he'll be a nice grab for a seattle if he lasts.
110.334two words: Glenn RobinsonFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixFri Apr 22 1994 16:421
    
110.335SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dFri Apr 22 1994 16:433
    two more:
    
    no chance
110.336FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixFri Apr 22 1994 16:532
    Check the odds.  They have a better chance at #1 than Orlando did last
    year.
110.337But seriously folks ...TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Fri Apr 22 1994 17:406
    Sherm, being a 90s kinda guy, was at his -ahem- girlfriend's side,
    assisting in the birth of their first child.
    
    Don't know how his wife felt about this!  Baroom-ta-da-ching!!!
    
    NAZZ
110.338another Baroom-ta-da-ching!!!BALL4::KURASBuy me some peanuts &amp; CrackerjacksFri Apr 22 1994 18:0810
    re -1
    
    >     Don't know how his wife felt about this!  Baroom-ta-da-ching!!!
    
    which reminds me of an all time favorite joke going thru my softball
    league a few years back:
    
    Q: Do you talk to your wife after having sex?
    
    A: Only if there's a phone in the room.
110.339HANNAH::ASHEThanks Zeke...Fri Apr 22 1994 23:021
    Chief should have picked on someone his own size...
110.340CTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Fri Apr 22 1994 23:1711
    Lissen, no team wins one, never mind three champeenships without
    a strong inside presence. Thanks Chief, You were the backbone.
    
    I got to see highlights of the fan reaction to da Chief and I wasa
    moved.
    
    Best of luck Chief, and here's hoping you end up in the C's
    organization.
    
    MikeL
    
110.341MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Sun Apr 24 1994 01:146
    yup, thank you C's for lasted nights win. Now Knicks have to win
    to have home court against the Bulls. Atlanta beat Orlando which means
    that they clinched the #1 seed.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.342CNTROL::CHILDSBrillant, Charming and NastyMon Apr 25 1994 12:208
 but the Knicks ain't getting by the Nets so it means diddly.......

 Parrish still hasn't retired so this all a bit premature. Nothing stopping
 him from taking a paycut and coming back. Just hope he doesn't go to
 another team......

 mike
110.343METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Apr 25 1994 15:528
> but the Knicks ain't getting by the Nets so it means diddly.......

yeah, not the team I wanted to see the Knicks face in the first round.
But I am sure Tommy will try and convince me why this thinking is
wrong.

The Crazy Met

110.344-1, Here we go again..CTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Mon Apr 25 1994 15:551
    
110.345MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Apr 25 1994 16:0011
 >> yeah, not the team I wanted to see the Knicks face in the first round.
 >> But I am sure Tommy will try and convince me why this thinking is
 >> wrong.

    Why? Are the Nets-Knicks another one of those bitter crosstown rival-
    ries out of that Isles-Rangers mold? We all saw how hotly contested
    the hockey matchup was, if the Knicks and Nets is anywhere near as
    entertaining they won't be calling New York "The City That Never 
    Sleeps" anymore.
    
110.346METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Apr 25 1994 16:015
MikeH or TTom can you please post the results of the Nets-Knicks
matchups this year? thanks.

The Crazy Met

110.347FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixMon Apr 25 1994 16:252
    Nets won the season series 4-1.  Knicks were down 3-0 before they won
    their first.
110.348CAMONE::WAYSnake and NapeMon Apr 25 1994 16:2612
Tommy,

While I don't give two rabbit-sized doo-doos about the Knicks or Nets,
I do see one apparent fallacy that keeps popping up when you talk of
rivalries, and that is that a great rivalry ensures hotly contested games.

The Rangers outgunnged the Islanders pure and simple, because of a lot
of store-bought, high priced talent.   I don't think you can discount
the rivalry just because the contests weren't close.....


'Saw
110.349gotta luv itFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixMon Apr 25 1994 16:262
    BTW - my oldest son and I went to the Suns-Clips game on Friday night. 
    AWA let out quite a roar when they posted the Celts-Bulls result.
110.350METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Apr 25 1994 16:365
I know the season series was 4-1 Nets, I wanted the scores and site where
each game was played.

The Crazy Met

110.351MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Apr 25 1994 16:4022
    
    >> I do see one apparent fallacy that keeps popping up when you talk of
    >> rivalries, and that is that a great rivalry ensures hotly contested 
    >> games.

       That makes no sense. What the hell kind of "great" rivalry has 
       no, not one, none, zip, zilch, zero "hotly contested games".
       It was The Crazy Sandbagger who said in note 44.78, " Rangers/
       Islanders is the kind of rivalry where the heavy favorite (in 
       this case the Rangers) would be a lot happier to not have to 
       tangle with the other team (in this case the Islanders) in 
       the playoffs." Either The Crazy Holtzer didn't know what he was
       talking about (a very distinct possiblity) or there's someone
       else even lamer than the Islanders that the Rangers would rather 
       have faced. Like the last-place finishers in the Dec hockey league.
       Another The Crazy Heiserer quote,"Rangers vs. Islanders is the kind 
       of rivalry where even today when the regular season in the NHL means 
       very little, regular season games between these two teams are played 
       with the kind of intensity you only expect in the playoffs." Appar-
       ently, these two teams have it ass-backwards because their playoff
       series had the intensity of a preseason scrimmage.
    
110.352METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Apr 25 1994 16:467
Ya know, I have 19 years of regular season and playoffs to back me up.
Tommy is focusing on one series. Hey, games and series do not always
follow expected form. This was on of those series.

The Crazy Met

110.353CAMONE::WAYSnake and NapeMon Apr 25 1994 16:507
I guess I was kind of taking a larger view too.

I'm not an expert on Islanders-Rangers, by any means, only have friends
opinions to go on, but it's a helluva rivalry even if the Rangers outgunned
them this season.

'Saw
110.354Shouldn't .352 be in the Crow noteAKOCOA::BREENMon Apr 25 1994 17:381
    
110.355METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Apr 25 1994 18:447
re: .354

nah not really. I did not predict that the Rangers would lose
to the Islanders just that I was very worried about that series.

The Crazy Met

110.356DUGROS::ROSSSmells like teen gunpowderThu Apr 28 1994 03:115
Propsed trade:

Celts #1 pick and Rick Fox to Minnesota for Laettner.

Discuss.
110.357MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Apr 28 1994 03:297
    why would Minnesot do it??
    
    also do the Celts have space under the cap. They have 2.8 million if
    they do not sign Parish.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.358DZIGN::ROBICHAUDThu Apr 28 1994 12:053
    	Never!  It would be a steal for the Timberwolves.               
    
    				  /Don
110.359laettner ???WMOIS::BALL_KThu Apr 28 1994 12:126
    Why Laettner in particular ??? Other than the obvious reason.  Is
    Minnesota shopping him ?  Besides our "strongest" position is probably
    PF. 
    
    							KB 
    strongest = a relative term
110.360Either way, I'd do itTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Thu Apr 28 1994 13:2710
    If Boston were to do this, would that mean playing a Radja-Pinckney
    combination in the middle, with Laettner as the power forward?  It
    poses some interesting possibilities, plus it gets the Celtics out
    of the Eric Montross sweepstakes!  
    
    I would be more inclined to believe Dee Brown and the #1, since Isiah
    Rider and Doug West both occupy the same position as Fox, and Dee could
    step into Micheal Williams' position at guard for the Woofs.
    
    NAZZ
110.361truly a defensive joggernautWMOIS::BALL_KThu Apr 28 1994 14:046
    Imagine the fear a front line of gamble, radja, and laettner would
    instill on opposing teams....
    I can think of a dozen PF's offhand I'd rather have, two dozen, if I
    really worked at it (re: your draft: I'd rather have Carlos Rogers,too)
    
    						KB 
110.362TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Apr 28 1994 14:1415
    
    >Imagine the fear a front line of gamble, radja, and laettner would
    >instill on opposing teams....
    
    	Gamble is history with the C's. He'll sign with a western
    conference team nexted year. Another reason not to trade Fox, as he'll
    be the only small forward on the roster, unless Xman comes back...
    
    	And Laettner was complaining about the Twoofs being a weak
    rebounding team??? Wait until he get aload of the Parish-less
    Celtics nexted year!!! 
    
    
    JimH
    
110.363CNTROL::CHILDSBrillant, Charming and NastyThu Apr 28 1994 18:446
Slash, you think the Jacobs boys will throw the Cletics out of the Garden
for failing to make the playoffs and costing them all that concession
money????????

mike
110.364jus' curiousMETSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Apr 28 1994 19:066
When was the last time the Boston Garden closed for the summer in April??

The Crazy Met


110.365before Lee & Bill were born!FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu Apr 28 1994 19:081
    
110.366WisearseCTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Thu Apr 28 1994 19:1313
    Good question Craze..
    
    Lessee I'm gonna say at the earliest 1955... but the Broonns were
    prolly in the playoffs but I think the Cup winner was decided by April
    back then..
    
    When was the last time MSG was open in June?
    
    MikeL
    
    PS gotta figure that the "bull" gang at MSG has had it easy.. neither
    Rangers or Knicks have made them work too much OT
    
110.367METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Apr 28 1994 19:2422
Knicks lost game 6 last year on Memorial Day and I'm guessing that
in 1973 the playoffs might have still ended in May. Which would mean
Knicks/Rangers never played in June. 

btw in the 1960's it is possible that the NBA playoffs ended in late April,
the season was shorter and there were only 2 rounds in the playoffs. Now
that I think of it the anniversary of Cousy's last game with the Celtics (ESPN,
TNT, or NBC, had a blurb on this in the last week or so)
was in April. So whatever year that was is the outside limit for
when this last happened.

But the question that you (MikeL) asked was:

> When was the last time MSG was open in June?

answer: 1993

see unlike Boston Garden, MSG has air conditioning and has events
going on all year long.

The Crazy Met

110.3688^)CTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Thu Apr 28 1994 19:314
    YOU KNOW WHAT I MEANT YOU PUTZ!!
    
    MikeL
    
110.369METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Apr 28 1994 19:334
heh heh 

The Crazy Met

110.370SOLANA::MAY_BRHoltz, ACC Crisp, TC*Fri Apr 29 1994 00:047
    I think the famous "Havlicek stole the Ball!!" game was something like
    May 11th, which means they went into May in the 60's. 
    
    What about the late 70's?  Did the infamous Wixks/Rowe team make the
    playoffs?
    
    brews
110.371cute p_name Brewsman, too bad it liesMSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Apr 29 1994 03:1512
    I'm talking about Cousy's last season which was 1963, 1964, before
    Havlicek "stole the ball".
    
    1979 Celtics did not make the playoffs, but the B's made it to the
    semi-finals and lost a 7 game series to the Canadians. I think that was
    the game with the too many men on the ice penalty late in the 3rd with
    the B's up by 2 goals.
    
    Could have been 1978 depending on what the Bruins did that year.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.372DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFri Apr 29 1994 11:2712
110.373SOLANA::MAY_BRHoltz, ACC Crisp, TC*Mon May 02 1994 15:418
    >It was quite a year in 1977. 
    >Dave Cowens left the team for personal    reasons for about 40-50 games
    >(actually he retired) and came back    before the playoffs.
    
    I remember '77.  Cowens left the team to become a cab driver.  That was
    back when I was able to go to more than 1 game a year.
    
    brews
110.374Eric Montross as C's pick at #9?AKOCOA::BREENMon May 16 1994 21:469
    speaking of todays globe:
    
    Larry Bird is quoted as being impressed with Montross.  Some are
    talking about his "strength".  I saw him in acc tourney be pushed
    around.  Montross last dominated in mid 92-93 and was adequate in '93
    championship.
    
    For once, I'm interested in acc's slant.  Faint praise = montross
    bashing
110.375he can be wrong, can't he?FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixMon May 16 1994 21:502
    Bird also said Donyell Marshall was the best in the country.  He said
    Penny Hardaway was last year.
110.376Look at the good sideVAOP28::RiceVAOU09::RICEMon May 16 1994 22:476
 >  Bird also said Donyell Marshall was the best in the country.  He said

He may be right, but I'll take Kidd. If the Celts draft Montross their 
lottery position should improve nexted year.

josh
110.377TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Mon May 16 1994 23:541
ABM - Anybody But Montross
110.378CNTROL::CHILDSBrillant, Charming and NastyTue May 17 1994 12:308
>> ABM - Anybody But Montross

 Forget it =Bob=. Unless the balls bounce correctly and the Celtics move
 into the top three, it's a done deal. They're not singing his praises as
 a smoke screen, they want him. Gavitt's in love with the ACC and Dean.

 mike
110.379CAMONE::WAYUn-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, CoffeeTue May 17 1994 12:506
Don't take Donyell -- not if he's ever going to have to go to the charity
stripe with a playoff game on the line....


He'd make Casey's feeble breakaway effort look like HoF material when compared
on the choke-scale.....
110.380I'd take Dare any day...TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue May 17 1994 13:0712
|>> ABM - Anybody But Montross
|
| Forget it =Bob=. Unless the balls bounce correctly and the Celtics move
| into the top three, it's a done deal. They're not singing his praises as
| a smoke screen, they want him. Gavitt's in love with the ACC and Dean.

I'm afraid you're right, I just hate top see them squander their best draft 
choice in seven years.  At least drafting the stiff will assure that they are
in the lottery nexted year too...

=Bob=
110.381just out of the lottery, like 8th place pleaseMSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Wed May 18 1994 05:385
    I think Montross would look great in a Celtics uniform. Marvelous
    choice.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.382ABMTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Wed May 18 1994 12:274
|    I think Montross would look great in a Celtics uniform. Marvelous
|    choice.

Wisenheimer
110.383Abdelnaby > MontrossHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderWed May 18 1994 13:470
110.384more on MontrossWMOIS::BALL_KThu May 19 1994 16:0314
    As one on the few people who believe Montross can be a decent pro, I
    still would be incredibly disappointed if they took him. They're going to
    be in the lottery for a least 2-3 more years no matter who they get.
    
    I think they gotta take Dare if he's available. This guy could be
    another Akeem in 3 years (or joe barry carroll, depending on how much he
    develops),  Montross is probably startable right now for the C's (over
    Acie..  big deal) but is probably not going to get much better and is
    certainly never going to be a playoff caliber of center.
    
    IF Dare's not available take the best "go-to guy" availble at ANY
    position and temporarilyf fill the need at center with a free agent  
    
						KB
110.385jury is inHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 19 1994 16:2110
'Scuse me but 

	"disappointed if they took him"
	"probably not going to get much better"
	"never going to be a playoff caliber of center"

sounds like you just said that Montross would *NOT* be a decent pro,
unless, of course, decent includes these things too.

TTom
110.386good > decent > end of the benchWMOIS::BALL_KThu May 19 1994 16:347
    "decent" is not a great compliment
    
    examples of other "decent" pro's:
    
    	the entire celtic's starting lineup (Parish not included)
    
                                        kb
110.387good > decent > Montross (IMO)HBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 19 1994 16:4813
Gotcha.

Fer some reason I think of starting in the NBA as "good" but then again,
it's all relative, in the eyse of the beholder, etc.

My take on Montross is that he might start, if'n it's early and the team
is bad or at least sadly lacking. The same people that draft him cause
he's a real 7 footer might just start him. 

Soon, everyone in the league, including the fans, will notice his
incredible lack of foot speed. At that point he becomes a spot player.

TTom
110.388CTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Thu May 19 1994 17:298
    
    With his incredible lack of foot speed, I'd bring a stopwatch to see
    who would win a full court race between Montross and Acie Earl.
    Makes you wonder who loves tortoises on the Celt's scouting staff.
    
    
    MikeL
    
110.389my money's on AcieHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 19 1994 17:310
110.390CNTROL::CHILDSI got them GhostTown BluesThu May 19 1994 18:478
      <<< Note 110.389 by HBAHBA::HAAS "Maybe too much Goody's Powder" >>>
                            -< my money's on Acie >-


 you'd loose. po po Acie is the slowest, I've ever seen...He tries but 
 he just can't build up any speed............

 mike
110.391Acie by a slow footHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 19 1994 18:539
Mike,

I feel confident in my main MTV main Montross. I've actually seen Acie
and compared to Montross he veritably motors.

So I'm standing pat, ready to take on all comers in the "NBA Slow Man
Contest".

TTom
110.392HANNAH::ASHELet me see shake yo tailfeather...Thu May 19 1994 18:571
    Chuck Nevitt?
110.393good guessHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 19 1994 19:086
Good ol' Chuck. Now there's some blinding speed, not!

But unlike Sir Chuck, princess-in-waiting KJ and Thundergoneoutta Dan, my
fellow Pack man has a Ring.

TTom
110.394HANNAH::ASHELet me see shake yo tailfeather...Thu May 19 1994 19:512
    Chuck's got at least one ring... maybe two...
    
110.395so?FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu May 19 1994 19:531
    I think William Bedford does too.
110.396HANNAH::ASHELet me see shake yo tailfeather...Thu May 19 1994 19:553
    How fast is Bedford?
    How about Tree Rollins?
    
110.397FRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu May 19 1994 19:591
    How about Dr. J, he and his 1 ring?
110.398Chuck Nevitt > Tom ChambersHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 19 1994 20:069
Which is greater than 0...

Tree is slow. He couldn't get away from Dirty Danny Ainge in that classic
tussle where Danny tried to bite Tree's hand.

And ML Carr is kinda slow too, at least with bringing out the straight
razor, he was rumored to be holding.

TTom
110.399An Ainge disciple??METSNY::francusTommy-Self-proclaimed God of WoofingThu May 19 1994 20:225
yabbut ESPN showed a tape of game 2 between the Rangers and DEVILS
where Claude Lemieux was biting one of the Rangers.

The Crazy Met

110.400HANNAH::ASHELet me see shake yo tailfeather...Thu May 19 1994 20:245
    Dr. J. wasn't slow afoot last I saw... maybe now, not with the 76ers,
    Nets or Pittsburgh Pisces.
    
    I can't see Alvan Adams doing the 100 yd dash in record time either.
    
110.401Tree Rollins is the CarnivoreFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixThu May 19 1994 20:281
    Ainge wasn't the biter, he was the bitee.  
110.402METSNY::francusTommy-Self-proclaimed God of WoofingThu May 19 1994 20:297
re: .398, .401

so who tried to bite whom??

The Crazy Met


110.403Tree was the one gnawing on WhineyDannyCTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Thu May 19 1994 21:051
    
110.404FYIFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaTue Jun 14 1994 19:082
    Dave Gavitt has just been reassigned in the front office.  ML Carr will
    be taking his place as VP of Operations.
110.405Where are you John Y.CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Wed Jun 15 1994 00:2711
|    Dave Gavitt has just been reassigned in the front office.  ML Carr will
|    be taking his place as VP of Operations.

AAARRRGGGHHH!

Dark days for the Celtics.  This is clearly a PR move.  ML is a great guy, but 
he has no expereince running a franchise, not even as the number 2 guy.

I wish him well, but I'm skeptical.

=Bob=.
110.406we'll see what happens...SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Wed Jun 15 1994 09:573
    Now ML will teach every player to swing a towel the right way...
    
                  stig
110.407WMOIS::BALL_KWed Jun 15 1994 12:541
    Has ML been working for the C's (as a scout or assistant coach) ?
110.408Suppose I should give him a chance...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Wed Jun 15 1994 16:337
|   Has ML been working for the C's (as a scout or assistant coach) ?

ML has been in charge of "community relations" for the past several years.  He
has admitted that he knows little of the draft, and will depend on others to
evaluate the talent.

GGGRRRRR
110.409METSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsWed Jun 15 1994 16:367
Jackie Macmullan (sp?) talks about this in her column and says it was
a great PR move but as far as building a team she is not that sure it
was the thing to do.

The Crazy Met
 
110.410CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Jun 15 1994 16:4312
    
    
    	Yabbut double yoo bee zee radion played part of ML's "acceptance"
    speech and he sounded like he's gonna be a dictator.  "My way or the
    highway".  Supposedly he meets with Chris Ford either today or tomorrow
    and if they're not on the same page, Ford is history.
    
    I remain,
    wondering what happened to ML's commercial business (environmentally
    friendly toilet paper)?
    Kev
    
110.411CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Wed Jun 15 1994 17:0514
ML being in charge bodes well for Ford.  It would be tough to can an 
ex-teammate.

I heard ML talk tough.  That is not my concern. Reality is that you play the 
hand that's dealt you.  If you have a talented idiot on your team (ala Scottie
Pippen [I know, I know "there goes Bob on his Scottie Pippen thang again"]), 
it is the challenge of the management to either get the most out of him, or
make an intelligent trade.

That's what worries me about ML.  I don't think he has the background to make 
the smart personnel moves that are needed to bring the franchise back to
respectibility.

=Bob=
110.412Will Nazz get to keep his job too?CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Jun 15 1994 17:159
    
    
    	Yabbut ML did say that he's totally dedicated to restoring the
    Celts to glory and that his job is a 16-17 hour a day one.
    
    I remain,
    wondering how much $$$ he's getting?
    Kev
    
110.413CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Wed Jun 15 1994 17:243
| Title:  Will Nazz get to keep his job too?
 
Nazz gives 100% every game...   
110.414If this is just for PR it's far too superficial to workNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jun 15 1994 17:2515
    The Globe reported that Larry Bird, who spends most of his time back
    home in French Lick, got the offer before ML Carr.  This franchise is
    in some serious disarray at the moment.  The thing I disagree with is
    that this is good PR.  I think it's terrible PR, with the potential to
    eventually be a better basketball decision than a publicity one. 
    Celtics' fans aren't stupid, and the Boston media is one of the last
    that will pull any punches in coveing this kind of a move.  I thought 
    that Jackie MacMullan's column was mostly sarcastic.  In an article that 
    initially purports that Paul Gaston is anything but dumb, she goes on
    to do everything but stick a caption reading M-O-R-O-N under the guy's 
    picture.
    
    glenn
    
110.415Public Relations ?WMOIS::BALL_KWed Jun 15 1994 18:1016
    Well if its a PR move, its not a great one... and since he doesn't seem
    to have any relevant front office experience, the reason for his
    selection is one of 2 possibilities:
    
    -Somebody in the ownership or retired front office (Red ?) thinks he
    is a natural basketball genius
    
    -Nobody else wants the Job
    
    Given that the C's are on a collision course with their worst season in
    history (or at least in my memory) and there is little in terms of
    draft choices, free agent dollars, or trade bait that the C' have to change 
    it.... well, draw your own conclusions
    
    				    Good Luck ML 
                                                         
110.416ML will do fine if left aloneAKOCOA::BREENThu Jun 16 1994 12:1612
    One factor that is not mentioned a lot is Red.  I think that he has
    never given up final control over signings and draftings and whoever
    takes the GM job has to follow his lead.
    
    And this has spelled disaster for the celtics much as Gorman having to
    run everything by redsox brass made him ineffective.
    
    My sources indicate that it was Red that drafted Jon Barry who could
    not be signed.
    
    One thing is fer sure, all the speculated criticisms of M.L. are real
    critiques of the Gavitt years
110.417SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Thu Jun 16 1994 12:245
    
    	Yeah, makes you wonder how much influence RED still has. Hopefully
    Red wants Yinka Dare. Maybe Gavitt wanted Montross?
    
    Ron
110.418CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunThu Jun 16 1994 12:2912
 Well having met ML personally and chatted with him for a while, I know
 he loves boxing and gambling. The Boxing will fit right in with the 
 style of plays the Knicks have introduced the league to and the gambling
 can only help. I'll feel real good about ML's chances of succeeding if
 gives his old buddy Ford the BOOT!!!!!!!

 I know the C's record isn't totally his fault but his style of coaching
 leaves a lot to be desired imo. I don't like guys who substitute by the
 clock or keep players in doghouses........

 mike
110.419You guys could all be "advisers" - unpaid, of courseTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Jun 16 1994 13:165
    Maybe I can turn my $35 a home game job into a full time role as a
    "consultant" for the team.  With, of course, maximum input from
    ::SPROTS.
    
    NAZZ
110.420METSNY::francusNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsThu Jun 16 1994 13:565
You only get input if we get a cut if the consultant fee

The Crazy Met

110.421;-)FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaThu Jun 16 1994 16:571
    Don't be silly Nazz.  The only good input you'll get is in CELTICS.
110.422Anybody but Montross...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Wed Jun 29 1994 12:4914
Wail if this is the start of a new administration...

The Celtics signed Dee Brown to a long-term, big-bucks contract yesterday.  I
beleive the terms were six years, $20 million, starting with $2.5 million thised
year.  Now I like Dee, but I wouldn't be willign to make this kind of investment 
in the guy, given the historical problems the Celtics have had with the salary
cap.  In addition, it caused Rick Fox's agent to "un-accept" an offer by the 
team.

In other distressign news, several publications who have done mock drafts 
(including today's Boston Globe) have the Celtics taking Eric Montross in 
tonight's draft.

=Bob=
110.423Go with Jalen Rose!!!!!!!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MWhat a terrible year 1918 Wed Jun 29 1994 13:018
    
    
          I tell ya I love the Celts but if they draft monstrous it's
    really gonna try my patience as a fan!
    
    
    
    Chap
110.424KALVIN::MORGANWed Jun 29 1994 14:019
    IMO, Jalen Rose would be a big mistake.  He's too lazy and from what
    I've seen of him, doesn't play the type of defense that Ford and Carr
    are looking for.  I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them pick
    Montross.  Word is they're shopping Acie for a high 2nd round pick.
    
    Rick Fox ought to take the money while he can.  He's an average player
    who's streakiness lands too often on the poor side.
    
    					Steve
110.425CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunWed Jun 29 1994 14:366
 Eddie Jones Please!!!!!!!!!!
 
 they could use a slasher with potential..........

 mike
110.426Doc's man Sarandis says JonesAKOCOA::BREENCome to DaddyWed Jun 29 1994 14:5417
    Ted Sarandis, doc midnight's favorite eei sports guy (and that's good
    enough for me) "mocked" Jones for celts off what Ted deemed an
    outstanding workout.
    
    Now the glob (I assume it was Jackie M) said the Temple duo (McKie the
    other) workouts were lackluster.  Was that her appraisal or was she fed
    this by Red or someone (equally sinister).
    
    If C's are disinforming about Jones then perhaps he is indeed the one.
    
    I thought problem was that though outstanding Jones was not considered
    #9 quality.
    
    They should just get rid of draft and let teams sign who they want
    since there will always be a cap, official or not.
    
    billthe
110.427CNTROL::CHILDSTemptation is a GunWed Jun 29 1994 15:0110
 I hear you Bill. All the reports I read question whether the duo from Temple
 can play defense due to Channey's zone principals. Riley has made zone defense
 the wave of the future so what is the problem? Celtics' brass feeding
 this rubish to the locals so they can grap Montross. Reminds of when they
 passed over Tim Hardeway for Michael Smith.......

 cmon ML do the right thing not the white thingh........

 mike
110.428DOCTP::TESSIERWed Jun 29 1994 15:048
When was the last time a Temple player made it in the NBA?  I wouldn't
touch these guys with a ten-foot pole.

Rick Fox might only be an average player, but you can't blame him for
asking for more money now that the Green Braintrust has just decided
that Dee Brown is a $20 million man.  Talk about rewarding mediocrity!

Ken
110.429DZIGN::ROBICHAUDThe Wind Cries MaryWed Jun 29 1994 15:546
    	It's very seldom that Chappy and I agree, but given what will
    be there at #9 (barring a really stupid pick), Jalen Rose would be
    a very worthwhile gamble because the upside potential for this guy
    is enormous.
    
    				  /Don
110.430HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Wed Jun 29 1994 16:012
    Mark Macon went to Temple, right?  Rivas didn't stick with anyone..
    
110.431exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jun 29 1994 16:104
    
     Boston could trade down to Golden State still take Eddie Jones and
    whatever GS could offer. Golden State would then take Montross be-
    cause they desperately need a center. 
110.432fyiFRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 29 1994 16:242
    In yesterday's KGME mock draft, Tommy Heinsohn picked Eddie Jones for
    the Celtics at #9.
110.433NAC::G_WAUGAMANVamos Argentina TodaviaWed Jun 29 1994 16:259
    FWIW, I heard ML Carr on the radio last week saying that he was very
    impressed with Jalen Rose.  Granted, he didn't exactly slam anyone, 
    and he did admit that Rose didn't shoot as well in the workouts as 
    some of the other candidates, but he did sound genuinely positive 
    about Rose...
    
    glenn
    
110.434FRETZ::HEISERugadanodawonumadjaWed Jun 29 1994 16:303
    Rose was interviewed yesterday here and said he has kept in constant
    contact with Webber and feels he understands the transition to the NBA. 
    Denver is supposedly foaming at the mouth over him at #13.
110.435Webber's going restrictedCSTEAM::FARLEYWed Jun 29 1994 16:3512
    
    
    	Yabbut doncha know that Webber exercised some kinda option in his
    1year old contract which will make him a restricted free agent on July
    1.
    
    Should the C's try to "entice" him ta come to Beantown?
    
    I remain,
    wondering how this will pan out
    Kev
    
110.436FRETZ::HEISERBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Wed Jun 29 1994 16:493
    From what I've heard, only Dallas is under the cap.  Boston and many
    others may not be able to afford him and Golden St. has the right to
    match anything.
110.437DOCTP::TESSIERWed Jun 29 1994 16:507
Webber's not going anywhere.  Golden State can and will match any
offer made to Webber.  The reason that he and Golden State signed
this type of deal (1 year and out) was to get around the salary cap
restrictions and rework his contract after one year to an amount
they both thought was appropriate.

Ken
110.438I like FOOTBALLS Cap.. Works alot better NO GUARENTTED ContractsMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Jun 29 1994 17:259
    Yes but Remeber Sherman Douglas, the Lakers offered something
    ridiculous, Miami matched and then for some reason the celtics
    traded for him.  Dallas could make an outragous offer, force GS
    to match and throw off there salary structure... What do you think
    a Bazzillion Dollers for 20 Years :-)
    
    Maybe he'll be around long enough to play with the moving backboards
    
    These contract are getting out of hand, the cap doesnt do squat...
110.439MSE1::FRANCUSNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsThu Jun 30 1994 03:305
    yessssss! Celtics took Montross; some more years of guaranteed
    mediocrity.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.440too badWMOIS::BALL_KThu Jun 30 1994 12:1314
    I was equally horrified that the C's took a russian in the second when
    Dontonio Wingfield (a guy who would have been a top 5 pick by his
    senior yr) among others, was still available
    
    But apparently they packaged him and Ed Pinckney for Blue Edwards and
    Derik Strong ? (or derik somebody), which is not quite as bad.
    
    I still would've taken Wingfield, but apparertly they're more
    interested in TRYING to have an adequate team (30-35 wins) next year, 
    than a good team (playoffs) down the road
    
    					KB
    
						
110.441I will go along with montross after much thoughtAKOCOA::BREENCome to DaddyThu Jun 30 1994 14:5912
    I agree on dontonio wingfield.  the sleeper of the draft for me (too?).
    
    I had a long drive to take yesterday and finally concluded that celts
    would take montross and that I agreed with them.  Larry Bird
    interviewed on radio made me feel a little better about it.
    
    But which montross will show up, the 92-93 or 93-94 version.
    
    I am nervous that passing up dare may come back to haunt them but their
    experience with Acie Earl's head left them leery about any player who
    doesn't exhibit a drive to succeed (and I don't know and neither do C's
    or anyone else about Dare).
110.442AAAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!!! CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Thu Jun 30 1994 15:118
Does it get any worse than this?

Wife is out of work.  I probalby will be soon.  Times are tough, and now, worst
of all...

My beloved Celtics drafted MONTROSS.

Why me???
110.443Concessions are where it's at......CNTROL::CHILDSLet Love Have It's WayThu Jun 30 1994 15:1910
 geez if all they wanted was hard worker why the heck didn't they just 
 take Curley...........

 While Eric's offense maybe versitile his rebound absolutely stinks. I 
 thought that was the main job of your big man. Yes he could be a decent
 player but given the status of the team they should have gambled. Looks
 like the Gastons are following the Jacobs' brother lead..............

 mike
110.444Even Curley over Montross? I like the kid, but forget it...NAC::G_WAUGAMANClemens' stats = Huge StrikezoneThu Jun 30 1994 15:338
    I'll stick with my comments in 10.1884 and repeat that at #9,
    there's nothing wrong with a pick of Eric Montross, who has enough 
    physical attributes and skills to merit a chance as any other 
    potential #9 pick not hailing from the University of North Carolina...
    
    glenn
    
110.445ROCK::GRONOWSKIIndians in 1994Thu Jun 30 1994 15:404
110.446Still mad that the bulls couldnt pull off the Kemp TradeMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Jun 30 1994 15:439
    Of course some of the player's selected after Montross will more then
    likly turn out better then him.  So far Rose, who else would have
    people selected over montross and why ?  Also remember the C's have
    no CENTER and I dont recall any FA Center's out there either ?
    
    I admit they should have tried a little harder to move down or trade
    but it doesnt look like there were too many trade's made pre draft.
    
    							MairB
110.447MSE1::FRANCUSNY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup ChampionsThu Jun 30 1994 16:074
    yabbut it's not like the only thing the Celtics need is a center.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.448Not a BB fan but I take the best available athleteAD::HEATHIt'll be Oct soon and Butch will be goneThu Jun 30 1994 16:116
    
    
       At least now there is some other athlete in Boston that Scott
    Cooper can beat in a foot race.
    
    Jerry
110.449CNTROL::CHILDSLet Love Have It's WayThu Jun 30 1994 16:5314
 Glenn at 6-9 Curley will get 6 or 7 rebounds a game too has better
 range than Montross, and better ball handling skills. The pluses I
 see for Eric is he can shoot with either hand and is nasty down low.

 Celtics should have just traded down.

 I would have taken Reeves, Rose, Jones, Wingate, Dare or my considered
 steal of the draft Damon Bailey before Montross.

 Did Autry get drafted?


 mike
110.450pretty sure that Autrey = Not draftedCSTEAM::FARLEYThu Jun 30 1994 16:581
    
110.451Big East roundupOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Jun 30 1994 17:579
    Autrey was not drafted,but a ton of Big East players were including:
    
    BC-Curley and Eisley
    Prov-Simpkins and Smith
    Pitt-Mobley
    St Johns-Scott 
    UConn-Marshall
    
    Notable undrafted:Karnishovas-Seton Hall,Autrey-Sysracuse
110.452DZIGN::ROBICHAUDThe Wind Cries MaryFri Jul 01 1994 10:393
    	Montross certainly picked an appropriate number...
    
    				  /Don
110.453CNTROL::CHILDSLet Love Have It's WayFri Jul 01 1994 12:454
 Will that be his scoring average or rebound average???????/

 ;^)
110.454HANNAH::ASHEMovin' on up, to the east side...Fri Jul 01 1994 14:032
    What was it?
    
110.455It'z number ZERO!!!!!! ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYFri Jul 01 1994 14:081
    
110.456Some post-draft thoughtsTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodFri Jul 01 1994 14:2827
    Re. Wingfield - he was the only freshman in the draft, and the only
    player in the draft who pulled a gun on his own mother!!!!!  Wadda
    nice guy - just the type of thug the Knicks shoulda taken!
    
    Re. Montross - he goes against everything ML was preaching last week
    regarding an uptempo game and defense, so I'm betting this was not his
    pick, but a "consensus" choice.  Here's hoping he can turn into a
    servicable center who averages 12 ppg and 7 reb.  I'd take that right
    now.  Curley was simply too small and thin to take the pounding that
    a starting NBA center must endure.
    
    Re. the trade - I'll really miss Ed Pinckney, the nicest guy on the
    team, but Derek Strong is a decent player, and Blue could make the
    Celtics forget about Rick Fox real quick.  Fox's agent was an idiot to
    renege on the deal he had.  He'll never get anything near those numbers
    (averaging $1.8 million for five years) from any other team.  And the
    reason Brown got a better deal than Fox is that he's a better player.
    Simple as that.
    
    Re. free agents:  I would like to see the Celtics bring in Adrian Autry
    and Melvin Booker in for a look at backup PG.  Neither was drafted and
    both have a lot of potential.  And whatever happened to Billy
    McCaffrey?  He transferred from Duke and had a great junior year at
    Vandy, would have been a first round pick, but stayed in for his senior
    season.  Did he play that poorly so that he wouldn't even get drafted?
    
    NAZZ
110.457Steve Alford SyndromeDOCTP::TESSIERFri Jul 01 1994 16:255
The knock on McCaffrey is that while he is a good outside shooter,
he needs a screen to get his shot off; he allegedly can't create his
own shot.  Also, he has no defense to speak of.

Ken
110.458CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Wed Jul 20 1994 13:199
Pervis Ellison?

Dominique Wilkins?

Geeze, have the Celtics lost it, or what?  These are NOT the guys to build on.
Between this and the Dee Brown contract, it's going to be years before we see
another contender.

=Bob=
110.459Pass on Pervis, Dominique..USCTR1::BARRYWed Jul 20 1994 14:4611
    I agree.
    
    I'd rather get some hungry young players and turn 'em loose in an up
    tempo game. 
    
    Does anyone have the roster that the Celtics are going with in this
    New York Summer League? Anybody know what the caliber of play is?
    
    In general, I like ML's approach to his new job so far.
    
    
110.460DZIGN::ROBICHAUDRock LobsterWed Jul 20 1994 16:326
    	If, and it's a mighty big if, Wilkins came to the Celtics they
    would be competitive next season.  Right now "Thanks Dad" Gaston
    is more worried about selling overpriced tickets than he is about
    the future of the franchise.
    
    				   /Don
110.461CNTROL::CHILDSA mountain of $$$ &amp; a SupermodelWed Jul 20 1994 16:364
 I'd love to see Wilkins in green!

 mike
110.462but not necessarily best way to spend $4milAKOCOA::BREENWed Jul 20 1994 17:0015
    it was my belief at the time of the nique-manning trade that atlanta
    had damaged their championship chances and in hindsite they could only
    have done better with wilkins over manning.
    
    Wilkins style had become more team oriented after his injury and I
    agree that with him and a center the c's might make it to .500.
    
    unfortunately I also agree with nazz and others that gavitt severly
    hamstrung the celts with his sherm douglas move
    
    but I hope that ml is out to mold a club in his image with full
    responsibility and authority and ford will follow his lead.
    
    I do suspect that if ford is not the coach for 95 then m.l. will take
    the reins
110.463CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Wed Jul 20 1994 17:3213
    
|    unfortunately I also agree with nazz and others that gavitt severly
|    hamstrung the celts with his sherm douglas move
 
Yabut Gavitt is kicked upstairs, and his successor, ML does the same thing with
Dee Brown.  I don't understand.

I don't think the Celtics would be a playoff team, even with Wilkins.  If Parish
goes, and Wilkins comes in, they will be at about the same level as lasted year.
(I know, there I go overrating Robert Parish again).  I'd rather see them hit
bottom, and get a low lottery pick.

=Bob=
110.464USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jul 20 1994 18:014
> I'd love to see Wilkins in green!

But Mike, 'Nique is telling everyone who will listen that he's going to
be a Knick !
110.465keep trying PattyCNTROL::CHILDSA mountain of $$$ &amp; a SupermodelWed Jul 20 1994 19:0511
> I'd love to see Wilkins in green!

> But Mike, 'Nique is telling everyone who will listen that he's going to
> be a Knick !


 wouldn't surprise me. Knicks have been trying to buy their way to the top
 for years..............

 mike
110.466DOCTP::TESSIERWed Jul 20 1994 20:136
'Nique told everyone that he would be a Knick IF the court ruled
in favor of the players and threw out the salary cap.  They didn't
and it's now unlikely that he'll sign with the Knicks because they
do not have a sizable salary slot for him.

Ken
110.467USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jul 20 1994 20:2313
> wouldn't surprise me. Knicks have been trying to buy their way to the top
> for years..............

Whoa, Mike !!!  Buy their way to the top ?  Last year's roster had only 2
players who were signed as NBA free agents:  Herb Williams and Anthony Bonner...
hardly major purchases.  The rest of 'em were either drafted (Ewing, Davis,
Anthony), traded for (Smith, Oakley, Harper, Rivers, Blackman), or signed as
CBA-or-the-like free agents (Mason, Starks, Anderson, Gaines).

Checketts and Riley have done a fine job of putting together a contender
with what they started with.  Charles Smith was supposed to be a significant
player, and he is not.  Dominque Wilkins would be a significant player,
and signing him would qualify as "buying" that last step to the title.
110.468"HUH"?AIMHI::KCUMMINGSThu Jul 21 1994 12:528
     
    
    RE: Checketts and Riley have put together a fine team with what they 
    started with???
    
    Ah, excuse me but, starting out with Ewing isn't exactly chopped liver!
    
    IMHO, they should have a Championship by now.
110.469Smith, Anthony, Bonner, Davis, Blackman is a good job???CNTROL::CHILDSA mountain of $$$ &amp; a SupermodelThu Jul 21 1994 13:033
 trading for players imo is an attemp to buy the championship. Especially
 when the said player is playing for a club that can't afford him.
110.470USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jul 21 1994 13:5210
> trading for players imo is an attemp to buy the championship.

Parish and McHale ?  Dennis Johnson ?


re:  Ewing

Put him on the current Celtics...do they win the championship ?
That's a ridiculous statement.  Their piss-poor mgmt during the
'80s never got him anyone to play with.
110.471Whan....AIMHI::KCUMMINGSThu Jul 21 1994 16:285
    
    
    RE: put him on the current Celtics...do they win the championship?
    
    NO, but if they had him over the last 8-10 years...they would have!!!
110.472Return on investment 100% better than KnicksyCNTROL::CHILDSA mountain of $$$ &amp; a SupermodelThu Jul 21 1994 17:0410
> trading for players imo is an attemp to buy the championship.

>> Parish and McHale ?  Dennis Johnson ?


 Right but atleast when the Celtics went out to buy a championship they
 end up bagging 3 of em.............

 ;^)
110.473USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jul 21 1994 18:073
>    NO, but if they had him over the last 8-10 years...they would have!!!

They didn't have Al Bianchi running the team either...
110.474to borrow a line HEE HAW!!!!!!CNTROL::CHILDSA mountain of $$$ &amp; a SupermodelThu Jul 21 1994 18:118
also of significant note about the Celtics buying championships vs the
Knicks' buying prowness, the Celtics won with K.C. Jones at the helm
not the sensational Patty Riley.......

 snicker snicker.......

 mike
110.475DOCTP::TESSIERThu Jul 21 1994 18:5110
Re.

 > also of significant note about the Celtics buying championships vs the
 > Knicks' buying prowness, the Celtics won with K.C. Jones at the helm
 > not the sensational Patty Riley.......

Right.  The sensational Pat Riley was busy on the other coast winning
four titles at the time.

Ken
110.476lvoe a good ratholeVAOP28::RiceIt can't happen hereThu Jul 21 1994 21:2610
>Right.  The sensational Pat Riley was busy on the other coast winning
>four titles at the time.

Yabbut if the Celtics had Patrick Ewing and Magic Johnson they mighta
won lasted year!

Sheesh. If Riley hadn't won 4 with Kareem and Magic he woulda been
run outta town.

josh
110.477CNTROL::CHILDSA mountain of $$$ &amp; a SupermodelFri Jul 22 1994 12:0319
Re.

 > also of significant note about the Celtics buying championships vs the
 > Knicks' buying prowness, the Celtics won with K.C. Jones at the helm
 > not the sensational Patty Riley.......

>> Right.  The sensational Pat Riley was busy on the other coast winning
>> four titles at the time.

 Hey, I don't recall asking any Lakers' fans for their opinions!  ;^)

 But anyways all Riley basically had to do back then was qualify for the
 playoffs to make it to the finals with the caliber of the talent out west.
 Certainly the Lakers bought more than a few players to help ease Patty's
 road..........


 mike
110.478where is K.C. now?BSS::MENDEZFri Jul 22 1994 17:196
    Hey Mike
    
    Do you think the celtics would have dominated out east without Bird?
    btw is KC coaching anywere right now???(:
    
    Frank
110.479He's all yours!SAHQ::ZOGRANMon Jul 25 1994 17:568
    Well, how do all of you Celts fan feel about havin the "Human Highlight
    Film"  aka "assist, whats an assist" aka 'Nique, a part of your
    organization?
    
    I think he's still trying to sell his Atlanta house!
    
    UMDan
    
110.480CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Mon Jul 25 1994 18:0622
|    Well, how do all of you Celts fan feel about havin the "Human Highlight
|    Film"  aka "assist, whats an assist" aka 'Nique, a part of your
|    organization?
 
I personally don't like it.  Doesn't seem like a rebuilding move to me.  In fact
of all the ML Carr moves so far, I'd have to say I don't like most of them:

	Drafting Montross		don't like

	Trading Pickney and #2 
	for Edwards and Strong		like

	Siging Dee Brown to
	a long term, big-buck
	deal.				don't like

	Sigining a 34 year old
	Wilkins				don't like   
 
Gonna be a long decade.

=Bob=
110.481MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jul 25 1994 18:2414
    
        Signing Dominique was another short-term move to keep
       the fans happy and not the kind of long-term rebuild
       that we were promised by ML. He's a box office name that
       will keep the casual yuppie fans at the Gahden happy until
       the new building opens to keep 'em happy for a few more and
       meanwhile the 'Tics won't have won a title in over ten years.
       It's the old bandaid on a chest wound approach that we've 
       come to expect from the theatre of the absurd that the front
       office of this once proud organization has become. I'd rather
       suffer through one or two or three more really bad years in
       exchange for some draft picks than get an aging scorer (and 
       not much more) that will make us just good enough to stay out 
       of the lottery.
110.482I like the dealVAOP28::RiceIt can't happen hereMon Jul 25 1994 20:5221
   >     Signing Dominique was another short-term move to keep
   >    the fans happy 

Right, and a good one. This will take some of the pressure off ML
and allow him a few seasons to get his act together. 

   >	and not the kind of long-term rebuild
       that we were promised by ML. He's a box office name that

Here I disagree. 'Nique will preserve Chief's salary slot for a few
years. There's no one available worth the slot this year except maybe
Grant, and a PF isn't what we need. Face it - until we can ditch
Sherman Douglas this team isn't going anywhere. Signing 'Nique, IMO,
is an excellent long term move. Let's see what else ML can come up 
with - we've got Blue, Dee and Sherman in the backcourt, and Dino,
'Nique and Montross up front. Could be fun to watch. Maybe ML can
trade Fox for a future PG...Charlie Ward comes to mind.....

josh


110.483Jordan?AIMHI::SMILLERTue Jul 26 1994 13:245
    I haven't picked up a paper yet today, but what is this that
    I am hearing about the Celtics asking Chicago to talk to Jordan?
    
    
    Steve
110.484Give ML back his towel...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue Jul 26 1994 13:3611
|    I haven't picked up a paper yet today, but what is this that
|    I am hearing about the Celtics asking Chicago to talk to Jordan?

In a word - OY.  

Carr is supposedly offereing Chicago a first rounder just to TALK to Michael 
about coming back.

I'm sure Jerry Krause got a good laugh about it.

=Bob=
110.485AIMHI::SMILLERTue Jul 26 1994 13:477
    
    Wow is Carr pulling at straws.  Granted if he ever pulled this off
    it would be a GREAT deal.   But if it busts and he does give up 
    a number 1 pick... It will be just like the 3 #1 picks for MacAdoo
    which busted!
    
    
110.486CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHYou gotta put down the duckie...Tue Jul 26 1994 13:507
    
|    Wow is Carr pulling at straws.  Granted if he ever pulled this off
|    it would be a GREAT deal.   But if it busts and he does give up 
|    a number 1 pick... It will be just like the 3 #1 picks for MacAdoo
|    which busted!
 
Yabut, luckily I don't think Jerry Krause took him too seriously. 
110.487Celts will never get him..MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Jul 26 1994 13:5310
    I think a #1 Pick just to talk would be a waste, for 2 reasons
    1-they have no slot to fit him, 2-Still dont think he'll be back
    playing basketball
    
    Chicago would be stupid not to take the pick just to allow carr to
    talk to jordan, he's doing chicago no good playing baseball, and if
    they cant get him to come back then he's useless to them.  Of course
    he could do alot of damage against the bulls should he ever come back.
    
    								MaB
110.488CESPUL::MAIEWSKITue Jul 26 1994 14:0211
  Well remember, we don't know what the deal really may have been if it was
ever discussed at all. This story was reported Sunday night on Bob Lobel's
Sports Spotlight as a rumor that Lobel had heard. That means that he probably
overheard the tail end of a "what if" type discussion by two cameramen at the
WBZ studio.

  Also, Dan Shaughnessy was present at the studio during the taping of the
program so the possibility exists that the rumor was drastically distorted or
completely fabricated. 

  George
110.489HANNAH::ASHETue Jul 26 1994 14:362
    ML commented on it yesterday at the news conference and confirmed he
    called Jerry Krause.
110.490And then round and round we go, or as the ap wire turnsAKOCOA::BREENTue Jul 26 1994 14:557
    It looks like ML has already "talked" to Michael via the media, nice
    job ML, my faith in you is looking good.
    
    Now it's Michael's turn to say "Gee, I'd always dreamed of being a
    Celtic and that's the only place I'd play in nba, too bad Chicago won't
    make a deal with C's since I'm never going to play for Bulls again
    anyway"
110.491METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jul 26 1994 15:505
How did the Celtics get Wilkins in under the cap? Is it a one year type
deal like Portland used??

The Crazy Met

110.492ML! ML! ML!VAOP28::RiceUp yer StackTue Jul 26 1994 15:519
ML, yer killing me! This is big fun! He's playing every
possible angle, signing 'Nique, creating FUD among other
GMs, what's he gonna do next? If he gets Ellison the
C's are gonna *tough* thisted year.

He's done more in a month than Gavitt did in years.

josh 
110.493AIMHI::SMILLERTue Jul 26 1994 16:283
    RE: .491
    
    Money from not signing Parish was used towards signing Wilkins.
110.494TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinTue Jul 26 1994 16:5220
    
    
>How did the Celtics get Wilkins in under the cap? Is it a one year type
>deal like Portland used??
    
    
    	Easy. The Celtics had the biggest salary cap exception slot in the
    NBA. The only teams who could have offered Wilkins more money than
    Boston were the Clippers (who did ~$7m/yr) and teams under the salary
    cap (Detroit. anybody else???)
    
    	Parish's salary slot was $2.8M, which is what Wilkins starts out
    at. After one year, he can exercise an escape clause and become a 
    free agent again. If not the second year of the contract is worth
    $3.64M (a 30% increase, max allowed under the cap). The last year of
    the contract is worth $4.5M.
    
    JimH
    
    
110.495CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jul 26 1994 18:0911
    
    
    	Yabbut with thisted ML wantin ta get Jordan,
    
    the only thing missing is Dancin Harry or Da Gorilla to make this
    circus really a circus!
    
    I remain,
    suspicios that DiNz has reported some missin 'shrooms near So. Station
    Kev
    
110.496USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jul 26 1994 18:2322
>Face it - until we can ditch
>Sherman Douglas this team isn't going anywhere.

Why this constant picking on Sherman Douglas ?

Douglas isn't the person to blame for the current state the Celtics are
in.  IMO, there are many factors that have played a part in why they
are where they are.  Start with Jan Volk, Dave Gavitt, the new ownership,
the Brian Shaw mess, Len Bias doing cocaine, the Reggie Lewis tragedy,
keeping the Big-3 in the family long after their usefulness to the Celtics
was over, signing X...

Sherman Douglas probably did more good things on the floor than any
other Celtic in '93-94.  And he'll probably look much better to his
critics this year, when he actually has someone to pass the ball to
who can do something with it.  But then we'll hear how he has miraculously
transformed into a great point guard.


>trade Fox for a future PG...Charlie Ward comes to mind.....

This assumes the Knicks would want Rick Fox   :^)
110.497MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jul 26 1994 20:3112
    
      
        Dominique is going to take the money for one year in Boston
       and then exercise his option and bail out to a contender *who
       can pay him* for what will probably be the last years of career. 
       As far as ML trading the first round pick for the right to talk 
       to Jordan... He may as well be talking about the right to talk 
       to Elvis. No one can take him seriously either way. It makes good 
       press and drums up interest when the 'Tics are about the 4th most 
       popular pro team in town but Don King will be the DAR's Man Of The 
       Year before Michael Jordan wears a Celtics uniform and everyone
       knows it.
110.498He may be a nice guy, I dunnoVAOP28::RiceUp yer StackTue Jul 26 1994 20:3213
>Why this constant picking on Sherman Douglas ?
>Douglas isn't the person to blame for the current state the Celtics are

Very true. But it is my opinion that Douglas is a big problem in the
re-building process, both because of his contract and his style. He
weak defensively, and his herky-jerky offense throws other players off 
their timing. He's great on an expansion team where the focus is on
one-on-one play, but the C's will need a passer. 

If I'm in ML's shoes I leave him unprotected in the upcoming expansion
draft.

josh 
110.499more on DouglasWMOIS::BALL_KWed Jul 27 1994 12:4411
    As a former Sryacuse fan, I've always liked Sherm
    
    but he has two basic problems
    
    1) As mention, he's overpaid
    
    2) Rick Fox syndrome. If you start him, he plays good enough to be a
    solid backup/spark of the bench. BUT, if you bring him off the bench, he 
    loses his confidence, consentration,etc...and plays less than CBA level
    
                                    KB
110.500;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Jul 27 1994 12:571
    
110.501Can't hit foul shots though.DOCTP::TESSIERWed Jul 27 1994 13:1310
Re.

 > He's great on an expansion team where the focus is on
 > one-on-one play, but the C's will need a passer. 

Douglas came very close to breaking Bob Cousy's record for most assists
in a season for a Celtic.  He is the best passing point guard they've
had since Tiny Archibald.

Ken
110.50230008::ROBICHAUDRock LobsterWed Jul 27 1994 15:179
110.503USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jul 27 1994 15:474
>	He may be the best "passing" point guard, but I would take Dennis
>Johnson over him any day.

True, but how DJ's are in the NBA today ?
110.50430008::ROBICHAUDRock LobsterWed Jul 27 1994 16:064
    	The NBA would never draft DJ today.  Too slow, can't shoot and
    with those ugly freckles, low marketability potential.
    
    				  /Don
110.505WMOIS::REEVE_CThu Jul 28 1994 16:447
    DJ was a much better passer than Sherm. The only reason his assists
    totals weren't higher was because Bird was on the team and frequently
    ran the offense. Besides, Sherm's assists all come at unimportant
    times, where DJ was great in the clutch. Totally objective opinion, of
    course.
    
    Chris 
110.506DOCTP::TESSIERThu Jul 28 1994 18:498
No question that D.J. was a better player than Sherm, but he was
really a shooting guard who was converted to the point when he came
to Boston.  He was a great defensive guard and a clutch shooter,
but his playmaking skills were limited to lobbing the ball into Bird
or McHale in the post and then getting out of the way.  Sherm is
much more of a creator.

Ken
110.507TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Jul 28 1994 21:2026
    
    
>...  He was a great defensive guard and a clutch shooter,
>but his playmaking skills were limited to lobbing the ball into Bird
>or McHale in the post and then getting out of the way.
    
    
    Ken, I'll agree that DJ will never be held up as an example of a 
    prototype Point Guard. But you terribly understate his playmaking
    skills. His bullet passes to Bird on back-door layups were a thing of
    beauty. He was also a pretty smart player, especially in the half-court
    offense which the mid-80s Celtics so heavily relied upon. 
    
    If the current version of the Knicks had a PG as proficient as DJ at
    running the half-court, they'ld all have rings by now.
    
    For that matter, if making those "lob it into the post" passes are so
    easy, how come Kenny Smith hit the guy sitting in the 3rd row as often
    as he hit Hakeem????
    
    Next it will be, "Bird wasn't that good of a shooter, and McHale had
    a couple of nice low-post moves." :-)
    
    JimH
    
    
110.508LK, FUDmeisterVAOU09::RICEThis, too, will pass...Thu Jul 28 1994 23:0113
    Mentioning DJ and Sherm in the same sentence is a travesty. I
    will never do it again.
    
    LK, don't talk stats to me about PGs. They're very misleading,
    particularly in Sherm's case. A playmaker does lots of other
    things, passes that lead to other passes, spacing, play-calling,
    etc. AllSherm does is make the *obvious* play, sometimes. And
    look at the TEAM assists. What are Mark Price's assist numbers
    like? IMO he's a better PG than Stockton.
    
    I'll trade ya Sherm for Van Exel, straight up. How about it?
    
    josh
110.509DOCTP::TESSIERFri Jul 29 1994 13:2123
Re.

 > If the current version of the Knicks had a PG as proficient as DJ at
 > running the half-court, they'ld all have rings by now

Actually, Derek Harper was probably the team's MVP in the finals.  That
wasn't their problem.  He just didn't have anyone to pass it to.  I
think a better way of looking at it is to say that if the Knicks had
Larry Bird or Kevin McHale instead of Charles Smith in the frontcourt
they would be wearing rings right now.

But I will grant you that DJ was better than Kenny Smith. ;)

Re. 

 > I'll trade ya Sherm for Van Exel, straight up. How about it?

Josh, when I was praising Sherm's passing and playmaking abilities,
I was doing it within the context of the Celtics.  In other words,
for a Celtic point guard, Sherm is pretty good.  But naturally I
wouldn't want that fat tank on the Lakers!

Ken
110.510Harper couldn't carry DJ's J.S.!!!TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Jul 29 1994 15:0114
    
    
    
>Actually, Derek Harper was probably the team's MVP in the finals.
    
    
    	Harper?? Harper???, Oh ya, I remember, he's the guy who kept
    passing the ball to Starks in Game 7, right??? Yup, great point guard!
    
    JimH
    
    :-)
    
    
110.511The FUD continuesVAOU09::RICEThis, too, will pass...Fri Jul 29 1994 15:4910
    re: Harper
    
    C'mon, LK. Harper had no one to pass it to? I guess that's why he
    kept throwing it to the photographers. It was Ewing's fault. He
    shoulda been standing where the ball went. Right. Don't get me wrong,
    Harper played a real good series, but the one thing he can't do is
    pass. With a good PG you just don't have those 8 minute scoring 
    droughts.
    
    josh
110.512CNTROL::CHILDSA mountain of $$$ &amp; a SupermodelMon Aug 01 1994 13:5915
  
 I like the trade. It should make them a better team especially if Pervis
 is healthy and here. I think that one's supposed to be announced today.
 Nique is the scorer they've been missing. Hopefully Douglas will cut 
 down on his turnovers, Fox's minutes will be limited, Radja won't frown
 when Nique becomes the man and Dee plays to his contract. Another move
 or two and this team could compete in what's obviously a league without
 a dominate team. It certainly takes the sting out of the Montross pick
 and means Montross doesn't have to be a savior just and a better than
 Joe Klien type of ballplayer.

 We've been away from the top for too long now. We need to wheel and deal
 and get back now not in three years through the draft imo.......

 mike 
110.513METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Aug 01 1994 15:146
C's signed Ellison using Gamble's slot. Not sure what sll the trade and
signings will do for the C's but it certainly shows that there is a 
way to change a team within the salary cap. Gavitt had no clue.

The Crazy Met

110.514CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is two years old!!Tue Aug 09 1994 14:5714
from note 174.etc.

>>    It's a franchise in decline 
>>    and Carr is desperately trying to stop the slide.

I agree with KB in .29.  I would have preferred to suffer through a horrendous 
season nexted year, getting the team in line for a good draft pick, and 
rebuilding, than making the moves taht they did, and assuring mediocrity.  The
worst move of all was the Dee Brown signing.  Brown is a talented player, but
not a future-builder type.

But then again, I usually go to one game a year max...

=Bob=
110.515SandbaggingHELIX::MAIEWSKITue Aug 09 1994 15:2117
  Some of the earlier replies bring up an interesting question. If the Celtics
deliberately went out and signed mediocre players to short term contracts over
the next couple years they would get great draft picks. They could even claim
that the players they signed the 1st year had the "Hellenic flu" and couldn't
play their 1st season guaranteeing a couple last place finishes in a row and a
high chance at some good picks. 

  Then they could groom this new team, add some journeymen players for filler
and off they'd go. 

  Would that work?

  Would that be allowed by the NBA?

  Why doesn't every team with aging players do that?

  George
110.516MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Aug 09 1994 15:5732
    
    >> Some of the earlier replies bring up an interesting question. 
    
       Not really.
    
    >> If the Celtics deliberately went out and signed mediocre players 
    >> to short term contracts over the next couple years they would get 
    >> great draft picks. 
    
       Not really again. If they stunk bad enough they would be guaranteed
       a pick in the top 11. That's not necessarily a "great" pick.
    
    >> They could even claim that the players they signed the 1st year had 
    >> the "Hellenic flu" and couldn't play their 1st season guaranteeing a 
    >> couple last place finishes in a row and a high chance at some good picks. 

       I'm sure this would go over real big with the NBA's front office not
       to mention Celtics fans everywhere. This would definitely be a case
       for "George Maiewski, Amateur Attorney!!!"

    >> Would that work?

       No.
    
    >> Would that be allowed by the NBA?

       No.
    
    >> Why doesn't every team with aging players do that?

       It's a dumb idea.
  
110.517HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Aug 09 1994 16:217
  As I understand, if you finish low enough you have a higher probability of
getting a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd pick. 

  So what would prevent a team from signing some nobodys playing a couple
terrible years then getting a few better picks? Why wouldn't it work? 

  George
110.518Cut ML some slackVAOP28::RiceUp yer StackTue Aug 09 1994 16:2516
ML is doing a great job. The way to rebuild is NOT THE DRAFT! A
crap shoot is not a good place to plan your financial security. 
The way to rebuild is to work the cap, create slots that are
available when key players go FA, and grab 'em. The C's are
setting themselves up for 3 years down the road, when 'Nique
retires. They will then have the Douglas contract, Reggie's 
contract and Chiefs (via Nique) all available, and will go
after established NBA stars, instead of paying some unproven
kid megabucks on a hope he comes through. Meanwhile, Dee and
Dino will have matured into excellent role players.

Parade in 98! ;)

josh


110.519A team of Neverwillbee wannabee'sMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Aug 09 1994 17:3524
    If your going to rebuild thru the draft (Youth Movement) you have to
    strick while the sticking is there...
    
    They could have traded Mchale/Parish back 3-7 years ago and may have
    landed a young stud/good Draft pick out of it.  Not too mention if they
    could have moved fox or brown they should have :-).
    
    This being faithful to your again players is at the expense of the
    fans and no one else.  What good did it do to keep parish the last 3-5
    years and now let him go and finish his last 2 somewhere else ?  Plus
    they didnt get SQUAT for him ?
    
    They will be medioca for the next 3 years (And Counting).  If we could
    go back to 87 (Dig Up those Archives) I made a statement in the notes
    file and to one of my Co-Workers that the Lakers/Celtics would not win
    a championship for 5 years.  Well I was wrong its 6 and counting....
    
    I remember my first few years with my group (85, 87...) there were a
    few Die Hard Celts/Lakers fans and being a bulls fan was tough... But
    I feel real bad for the fans of those teams that made all there moves
    based on staying medioca and filling the areana and never looking at
    the future...
    
    								mab
110.520MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Aug 09 1994 17:5718
    
    
  >> The way to rebuild is to work the cap, create slots that are
  >> available when key players go FA, and grab 'em. 
    
     The last five champions - the Rockets, the Bulls, the Pistons,
     the Celtics and the Lakers were all led by player(s) acquired
     through the draft. Any FAs on those teams were by and large
     role players. Hired guns don't win championships. They can con-
     tribute but you don't win the big one by "working the cap". At
     least no one has yet. No matter what, we're going to have to 
     endure three or four years of mediocrity around these parts. I'd
     just rather have potentially the next Michael Jordan at the end 
     of the rainbow than an aging Horace Grant. Unfortunately, this is 
     the town where the Bill Russell led 'Tics dynasty couldn't sell out
     every night. ML knows that if he puts three back to back stinkeroo
     season together not only will he be out of a job but the new Shawmut
     Center will be deader than Madonna's caeer.
110.521'94-'95 ScheduleFRETZ::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Aug 09 1994 18:29204
$!
$!    ** All times are in Boston's EST zone **
$!
$!    Command format:   
$!    
$!    $ @celtics p1 p2 p3
$!
$!    p1 = item to search for, such as opponent's name, TV station, day of week)
$!    p2 = forecasting switch; enter Y to enable; N or blank to disable
$!    p3 = if p2 is Y, enter a number from 1-125; 7 is the default
$!    
$ Save_Message = F$Environment("Message")
$ Set Message/Nosever/Noid/Notext/Nofac
$ Say :== Write sys$output
$!
$! Set up some date and time constants based on today's date
$!
$ TODAYS_DATE = F$CVTIME(F$TIME(),"ABSOLUTE","DATE")
$ TODAY_DAY= "''f$extract(0,2,TODAYS_DATE)'"
$ TODAY_MONTH=f$extract(3,3,TODAYS_DATE)
$ TODAY_YEAR=f$extract(7,4,TODAYS_DATE)
$ TODAY_DOW = "''f$cvtime(TODAYS_DATE,,"WEEKDAY")'"
$ THIS_FILE = f$environment("procedure")
$!
$! Validate the first parameter. Default to today's date.
$!
$ gametoday = TODAY_MONTH + "-" + TODAY_DAY
$ If P1 .eqs. "" 
$ then 
$	lookingfortoday = "TRUE"
$	p1 = "''gametoday'"
$	Say "Today's Boston Celtics' basketball game: "
$ else
$ 	Say "Selected Boston Celtics' basketball game(s): "
$ 	lookingfortoday = "FALSE"
$ endif
$!
$! Search for the specified value ( team, date, etc.) Check the status
$! of the search and print a success or failure message.
$!
$ search 'THIS_FILE' "''p1'"
$ is_there = $status
$ if is_there .eqs. "%X08D78053" 
$ then 
$	if lookingfortoday then Say "No game today."
$	if .not. lookingfortoday then Say "No game found containing ""''P1'""."
$ endif
$!
$! If P2 is "Y" then we are forecasting - look at the next n days, where
$! n is specified in P3.
$!
$next_n_days:
$ if P2 .eqs. "Y" 
$ then
$	! Default to the next 7 days. Look in P3 for another value.
$	if P3 .eqs. "" .or. P3 .eqs. " " then P3 = 7
$	if f$type(P3) .nes. "INTEGER" .or. -
	   P3 .lt. 1 .or. -
	   P3 .gt. 125
$		then
$			say "Invalid parameter: P3 must be an integer from 1-125."
$			goto done
$		endif
$ else
$      goto done
$ endif
$!
$! Loop oover the next n days, looking for games.
$!
$ Say "Boston Celtic games in next "+"''P3'"+" days:"
$!
$! Start with the first day, to build the search string
$!
$ count = 1
$ SEARCH_DATE = F$CVTIME( "''TODAYS_DATE'+''COUNT'-0:0:0.0", "ABSOLUTE","DATE" )
$ SEARCH_MONTH = F$CVTIME( SEARCH_DATE, "ABSOLUTE", "MONTH")
$ SEARCH_DAY = F$CVTIME( SEARCH_DATE, "ABSOLUTE", "DAY")
$!
$! Zero-Fill date values
$!
$ if SEARCH_DAY .lt. 10 then SEARCH_DAY = "0''SEARCH_DAY'"
$ if lookingfortoday .eqs. "FALSE"
$	then
$		SEARCH_STRING = "''gametoday',"
$	else
$		SEARCH_STRING = ""
$	endif
$ SEARCH_STRING = SEARCH_STRING + "''SEARCH_MONTH'-''SEARCH_DAY'"
$!
$! Now loop over the number of days specified
$!
$search_loop:
$ count = count + 1
$ if count .gt. P3 then goto do_search
$!
$! Use the time functions to build a date string, so we don't have to do the
$! checking ourselves
$!
$ SEARCH_DATE = F$CVTIME( "''TODAYS_DATE'+''COUNT'-0:0:0.0", "ABSOLUTE","DATE" )
$ SEARCH_MONTH = F$CVTIME( SEARCH_DATE, "ABSOLUTE", "MONTH")
$ SEARCH_DAY = F$CVTIME( SEARCH_DATE, "ABSOLUTE", "DAY")
$ if SEARCH_DAY .lt. 10 then SEARCH_DAY = "0''SEARCH_DAY'"
$ SEARCH_STRING = SEARCH_STRING + ",''SEARCH_MONTH'-''SEARCH_DAY'"
$ goto search_loop
$!
$! Actually do the search
$!
$do_search:
$ search 'THIS_FILE' 'SEARCH_STRING'
$ if $status .eqs. "%X08D78053" then -
	say "No games found in the next ''P3' days."
$ goto done
$!
$! Playoff schedule isn't determined yet.
$!
$say_playoffs:
$ SAY "Playoffs due to start... schedule is TBD!!!"
$ goto done
$ done:
$ set mess'Save_Message'
$ EXIT
NOV-04     New York      7:30     Friday  
NOV-05  at Indiana       7:30     Saturday   
NOV-11     Houston       7:30     Friday  
NOV-12  at Minnesota     8:00     Saturday   
NOV-15  at Atlanta       7:30     Tuesday   
NOV-16     Seattle       7:30     Wednesday  
NOV-18  at Miami         7:30     Friday   
NOV-19  at Washington    7:30     Saturday   
NOV-22     Milwaukee     7:30     Tuesday   (Hartford) 
NOV-23     Charlotte     7:30     Wednesday  
NOV-25     Orlando       7:30     Friday  
NOV-26  at Philadelphia  7:30     Saturday   
NOV-30     Detroit       7:30     Wednesday  
DEC-02     Phoenix       7:30     Friday  
DEC-03  at Chicago       8:30     Saturday   
DEC-06  at New York      7:30     Tuesday   
DEC-07     Atlanta       7:30     Wednesday  
DEC-09     Cleveland     7:30     Friday  
DEC-10  at New Jersey    7:30     Saturday   
DEC-12     Denver        7:30     Monday  
DEC-14  at San Antonio   8:30     Wednesday   
DEC-15  at Dallas        8:30     Thursday   
DEC-17  at Houston       8:30     Saturday   
DEC-19  at Denver        9:00     Monday   
DEC-23     Philadelphia  7:30     Friday  
DEC-26  at Cleveland     1:00     Monday   
DEC-28     Chicago       7:30     Wednesday  
DEC-30  at Detroit       8:00     Friday   
JAN-04     Miami         7:30     Wednesday  
JAN-06     Portland      7:30     Friday  
JAN-07  at Charlotte     7:30     Saturday   
JAN-09     Washington    7:30     Monday  
JAN-11     Indiana       7:30     Wednesday  
JAN-13     Utah          8:00     Friday  
JAN-15     Sacramento    7:00     Sunday  
JAN-17     San Antonio   7:30     Tuesday  
JAN-18  at Miami         7:30     Wednesday   
JAN-20     L.A. Lakers   7:30     Friday  
JAN-21  at Atlanta       7:30     Saturday   
JAN-24  at Orlando       7:30     Tuesday   
JAN-25     L.A. Clippers 7:30     Wednesday  
JAN-27     Golden State  7:30     Friday  
FEB-01     Charlotte     7:30     Wednesday  
FEB-04  at New Jersey    8:00     Saturday   
FEB-05     Minnesota     7:00     Sunday  
FEB-08     Cleveland     7:30     Wednesday  
FEB-12     All-Star Game 6:00     Sunday    (Phoenix)
FEB-14  at Sacramento    10:30    Tuesday   
FEB-15  at Golden State  10:30    Wednesday   
FEB-17  at L.A. Clippers 10:30    Friday   
FEB-18  at Utah          9:00     Saturday   
FEB-21  at Phoenix       9:00     Tuesday   
FEB-23     Orlando       7:30     Thursday  (Hartford) 
FEB-24  at Orlando       7:30     Friday   
FEB-27     Indiana       7:30     Monday  
MAR-01     Washington    7:30     Wednesday  
MAR-03     Milwaukee     7:30     Friday  
MAR-04  at Indiana       7:30     Saturday   
MAR-07  at New York      7:30     Tuesday   
MAR-08     New York      7:30     Wednesday  
MAR-10     New Jersey    7:30     Friday  
MAR-12     Atlanta       2:30     Sunday  
MAR-14  at Seattle      10:00     Tuesday   
MAR-16  at Portland     10:00     Thursday   
MAR-17  at L.A. Lakers  10:30     Friday   
MAR-19  at Milwaukee     2:30     Sunday   
MAR-22     Chicago       7:30     Wednesday  
MAR-24  at Philadelphia  7:30     Friday   
MAR-25  at Detroit       7:30     Saturday   
MAR-28  at Miami         7:30     Tuesday   
MAR-30  at Chicago       8:30     Thursday   
MAR-31     Miami         7:30     Friday  
APR-02     Dallas        4:00     Sunday  
APR-04  at Cleveland     7:30     Tuesday   
APR-07     Philadelphia  7:30     Friday  
APR-09  at Washington    1:00     Sunday   
APR-10  at Charlotte     7:30     Monday   
APR-13     Orlando       7:30     Thursday  
APR-15     Detroit       7:30     Saturday  (Hartford) 
APR-17     New Jersey    7:30     Monday  
APR-19  at Milwaukee     8:30     Wednesday   
APR-21     New York      7:30     Friday  
APR-23  at New Jersey    6:00     Sunday   
110.522go for max winsAKOCOA::BREENTue Aug 09 1994 18:366
    Len Bias is a good example of risks of draft
    
    Celtics are public and owe return on Investor's $
    
    And for all we know C's may be executing your plan George but I hope to
    see them maximizing competitiveness
110.523WMOIS::BALL_KTue Aug 09 1994 18:4713
    we might end up with a good pick anyway. 
     
    I believe that if everything
    goes right, this team has a good shot of being a .500 or better team, 
    
    BUT if
      Pervis goes down with his usual yearly injury (70% probablity)
      Dominique is injured (10%) or has less left in him than is thought (25%)
      or is not really capable of carrying a team on his back (40%)
    
    then this team is back in the lottery, and everybodys ?happy? 
    
    							KB
110.524P.S.WMOIS::BALL_KTue Aug 09 1994 18:494
    but in the meantime, ML has at least made the SUMMER interesting for
    Celtics fans
    
    						KB
110.525GO ML!VAOP28::RiceRAVENS ROOLTue Aug 09 1994 19:3210
What ML is doing does not preclude making a good draft pick. To
win a championship you need a lucky draft pick AS WELL as working
the cap and maximizing the FA market. Pippin was a lucky draft pick,
for example. No matter what ML does he will get good draft picks for 
a few years, not to worry you lottery fans. But he also has to sell
tickets and work the cap, else he will be job hunting. IMO he's doing
a great job.

josh  
110.526HANNAH::ASHEConjunction jct, what's yo function?Tue Aug 09 1994 19:501
    How do you get tix for games in Haafud...
110.527MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Aug 09 1994 19:559
    
      ML looks great in comparison to Dave Gavitt. Hard to imagine
     fainter praise though, isn't it? What ML has done in reality is
     sign a big name 34 year old who has depended on athletic pyro-
     technics his entire career and will cry for the the ball in the 
     third quarter of a 4 for 35 night. To go with that he has signed 
     an agile but fragile four or five spot player who has loads of
     potential but is more injury prone than Fire Marshall Bill. Let's
     not build any monuments yet.
110.528PokerVAOP28::RiceRAVENS ROOLTue Aug 09 1994 21:2324
   >   ML looks great in comparison to Dave Gavitt. Hard to imagine

Exactly. While his moves with Nique and Nervous might not work out in
the short term, they will definitely help long term by creating slots.
Being GM in the NBA is like a poker game - you collect cards and pick
the right moment to play them. Meanwhile you bluff and smile and distract
the competition any way you can (MJ). Once you have a "dynasty", you can
make it last by careful timing, by making sure you have a slot when the 
right player is available. The C's did that beautifully up the death of 
Bias - they had played all their cards to get him, and he was the tran-
sition to the post-Bird generation. When they lost Bias the years of post-
Bird depression were inevitable, and the Reggie tragedy made it that much 
worse. OKay, everyone gets snake bit, but if Bias and Reggie were here
the C's would still be on top.

So ML has to recover from that, which means protecting Parish's slot
until he can fill it properly (Nique), recovering from the Douglas
contract fiasco, and waiting for Reggie's slot to return (I forget
how that works). He did the best he could do in the short term. If
he had more time maybe Horace Grant would be in green, who knows,
but let's see what he can pull of nexted year. I *love* his ability
to pull the trigger on a deal after years of Gavitt frustration.

josh
110.529will be looking forward to Gavitt's side of thingsAKOCOA::BREENWed Aug 10 1994 13:099
    I have heard a theory that Gavitt did not make the Barry pick, that Red
    did it on his own and from their Gavitt never really tried but just did
    the job committee style assumming that's what C's wanted.  I'm sure dg
    will have his say on his celtic years when he's free to do so.
    
    I'm sure he'd say about Ellison and 'nique: "I could've done that but
    C's wouldn't have let ME.
    
    Key to the whole thing is the Montross gamble.
110.530MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Aug 10 1994 14:2618
  >> Meanwhile you bluff and smile and distract the competition any way 
  >> you can (MJ). 

     No one in the Boston area took those overtures at Michael Jordan
     seriously. No one. Nobody. It made nice press and was mildly
     amusing but we didn't expect to see Michael in a 'Tics uniform
     in this lifetime.

   >> Once you have a "dynasty", you can make it last by careful timing, 
   >> by making sure you have a slot when the right player is available. 
   >> The C's did that beautifully up the death of Bias - they had played 
   >> all their cards to get him, 

      I don't remember the 'Tics "playing all of their cards" to get Bias.
      As I remeber it they literally hit the lottery when as a budding 
      dynasty the came up with the second pick overall in the draft while
      giving up next to nothing.
    
110.531HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Aug 10 1994 14:3612
RE        <<< Note 110.530 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>      I don't remember the 'Tics "playing all of their cards" to get Bias.
>      As I remeber it they literally hit the lottery when as a budding 
>      dynasty the came up with the second pick overall in the draft while
>      giving up next to nothing.
    
  No, what happened was that they traded Gerald Henderson to Seattle for their
1st round pick the following year. Seattle finished in the bottom 9 giving
the Celtics a pick in the lottery. They drew a high slot and picked Bias.

  George
110.532a more important steal than Larry's???CNTROL::CHILDSBack Where it All BeganWed Aug 10 1994 14:4917
>>      I don't remember the 'Tics "playing all of their cards" to get Bias.
>>      As I remeber it they literally hit the lottery when as a budding 
>>      dynasty the came up with the second pick overall in the draft while
>>      giving up next to nothing.
    
>  No, what happened was that they traded Gerald Henderson to Seattle for their
> 1st round pick the following year. Seattle finished in the bottom 9 giving
> the Celtics a pick in the lottery. They drew a high slot and picked Bias.

  
 So that bum Danny Ainge could start. The start of the new white regime at
 headquarters........

 rrrggghhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!

 mike
110.533Good to be backTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodWed Aug 10 1994 15:0141
    I knew I couldn't stay away too long.  This is my first note since
    coming back.
    
    Josh is 100% correct regarding the Celtics future.  The Nique signing
    has set them up perfectly for three years down the road, and made them
    competitive in a weak Eastern conference right now.
    
    Sherman Douglas has three years remaining on that monstrosity of a
    contract he has.  Nique has a three year deal.  Neither will be back
    when their contracts expire, and they will leave huge holes in the
    salary structure where you can plug in a free agent.
    
    As far as building through the draft goes, you don't.  Ask the Nets,
    Kings, Bullets, and especially the Clippers about it.  The Clippers
    have had TWELVE #1 picks (including SEVEN in the lottery) over the past
    eight years.  Would you want to be a Clipper fan?
    
    What can happen to you in the draft is you can get lucky.  Like the
    Bulls.  They were very lucky Michael Jordan was the 3rd pick in the
    draft, and they were just as lucky when Seattle traded their #1 pick
    (Scottie Pippen) to Chicago for their #1 selection (Olden Polynice).
    I wonder who got the better of that deal!!!
    
    Someone said the Celtics, Lakers, Pistons, Bulls, and Rockets built
    their teams through the draft.  That is only partially true.  take the
    Celtics of the 80s.  They were lucky in the draft to select AInge in
    the second round when everyone else thought he was going to play
    baseball.  They drafted Bird as an eligible junior, which you can't do
    any more.  And they swindled Golden State to draft McHale.  But every
    other player on those teams who mattered (Parish, DJ, Wedman, Sichting,
    Walton, Archibald, Ford) was acquired through a trade.
    
    Look at the Lakers.  Michael Cooper was an extremely fortunate third
    round pick.  Magic and Worthy were #1 picks.  Kareem was picked up in a
    trade, as was Byron Scott and Mychal Thompson. 
    
    Bottom line for the Celtics is that ML has done an incredible job in
    his first six weeks in charge, and if Pervis Ellison plays in 65 games
    this season, the Celtics will win the Atlantic Division title.
    
    NAZZ 
110.534MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Aug 10 1994 15:4430
    
  >> As far as building through the draft goes, you don't.  Ask the Nets,
  >> Kings, Bullets, and especially the Clippers about it.  The Clippers
  >> have had TWELVE #1 picks (including SEVEN in the lottery) over the past
  >> eight years.  Would you want to be a Clipper fan?
    
     No, but I wouldn't feel too badly about beiong a Magic, Hornets or 
     Nuggets fan - three more teams that have built their core around
     the draft and that should be very good for years to come. No one
     in the last ten years has done what is being suggested here - that
     is build a championship team through the FA market. Phoenix came
     close but no cigar with Barkley and Johnson. But every team in the
     last ten or so years that has won the title was led by a player
     that they *drafted*. What ML is doing will make the 'Tics comp-
     etitive in the short term but doesn't bring us any closer to a
     title - not now and not in three years.
    
    >> Someone said the Celtics, Lakers, Pistons, Bulls, and Rockets built
    >> their teams through the draft.  That is only partially true.  take the
    >> Celtics of the 80s.  They were lucky in the draft to select AInge in
    >> the second round when everyone else thought he was going to play
    >> baseball.  They drafted Bird as an eligible junior, which you can't do
    >> any more.  And they swindled Golden State to draft McHale.  But every
    >> other player on those teams who mattered (Parish, DJ, Wedman, Sichting,
    >> Walton, Archibald, Ford) was acquired through a trade.
    
       You forgot Finals MVP, Cedric Maxwell, drafted out of UNC-Charlotte.
       And Gerdald Henderson who made that huge steal.    
    
    
110.535ThankGod, da NAZZ is back!VAOP28::RiceRAVENS ROOLWed Aug 10 1994 15:5613
 >  Josh is 100% correct regarding the Celtics future.  The Nique signing
 >   has set them up perfectly for three years down the road, and made them
 >   competitive in a weak Eastern conference right now.

WELCOME BACK NAZZ!!! ;););) I needed some help on this one.

About Pervous. He has a 6 year deal, right? How much per year? If he
stays healthy ML will look like a *genius*, the guy can play. If his
knees go and he retires, what does that do slot-wise? Let's say he
quits in 2 years....do we get his full slot, or half, or what?

josh

110.536CNTROL::CHILDSBack Where it All BeganWed Aug 10 1994 16:559
>    Bottom line for the Celtics is that ML has done an incredible job in
>    his first six weeks in charge, and if Pervis Ellison plays in 65 games
>    this season, the Celtics will win the Atlantic Division title.
    
     THat's the Nazz we know and love!!! Welcome back..........

 mike

110.537HANNAH::ASHEHookin' up words &amp; phrases &amp; clausesWed Aug 10 1994 17:302
    Hear hear!
    
110.538To strick or not to strick? Stick around.DOCTP::TESSIERWed Aug 10 1994 18:0319
Re.

 > If your going to rebuild thru the draft (Youth Movement) you have to
 > strick while the sticking is there...

Agreed, of course, but how do you know when the sticking is there so that
you can strick?  Is there some place you can call to ask about the sticking
before deciding whether or not to strick?  Perhaps the Weather Channel?

Re.

 > They will be medioca for the next 3 years (And Counting).  If we could
 > go back to 87 (Dig Up those Archives) I made a statement in the notes
 > file and to one of my Co-Workers that the Lakers/Celtics would not win
 > a championship for 5 years.  Well I was wrong its 6 and counting....

Yes, you were wrong.  The Lakers won it in '87 and '88.

Ken
110.539METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Aug 10 1994 19:015
Yer wrong about the C's winning the division, Nazz; but it is
good to have you back.

The Crazy Met

110.540HendersonUSCTR1::BARRYWed Aug 10 1994 19:038
    re a few back....
    
    Wasn't Gerald Henderson signed as a free agent out of the CBA?
    
    I think so.....
    
    Nazz, nice to have you back.
    
110.541CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie is two years old!!Wed Aug 10 1994 19:053
|   Wasn't Gerald Henderson signed as a free agent out of the CBA?
 
I don't know if it was the CBA, but Henderson was indeed a free agent.
110.542Good front office people who know that they're doing is the keyTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Aug 11 1994 18:2225
    If you can guarantee me that I will get the #1 pick two years in a row, 
    then I will rebuild through the draft.  Sheesh - even Pat Williams can
    do it, and now he's screwing up his team's chemistry because he ended
    up with the wrong guy (Webber vs Hardaway) IMO lasted year.  And the
    Hornets did OK with the #1 pick and the #2 pick, although #2 picks
    historically haven't been that great.
    
    And look at the Nets.  For four out of five years between 1987 and 1991
    they drafted 2nd, 1st, (12th - Mookie Blaylock!!!), 4th and 3rd, but
    1994 was the first year they even made a ripple in the playoffs. 
    Here's who they got and where, which shows what mismanagement can do!
    
    1987 - (3rd) Dennis Hopson (over Pippen, Grant, and the Reggies)
    1988 - (4th) Chris Morris
    1989 - (12) Mookie - a very good pick
    1990 - (1st) Derrick Coleman
    1991 - (2nd) Kenny Anderson
    
    Then the idiots traded Mookie for Rumeal Robinson, who'll likey be with
    the Sioux Falls Skyforce or some other such team thisted season.
    
    Bottom line - be lucky twice in the lottery after suffering a dozen
    years of garbage teams.  That's how you build through the draft.
    
    NAZZ
110.543SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Fri Aug 12 1994 13:4712
    Nazz,
    
    	I agree that you need to be lucky in the draft 2 years in a row.
    You also need to be lucky enough, that the years you are bad. There
    is a can't miss superstar available. Charlotte couldn't go wrong
    selecting LJ. Then the next year they ended up with the #2. You
    can't go wrong when both Shack, and Zo come out the same year.
    	The year Shack and Zo came out had to be easy picks for the #1
    and #2 picks. This year for #2 you had to choose between Kidd, Hill,
    and Marshall. Which one is going to be the best for your team?
    
    Ron
110.544Celtics Notes on Fretz::????ALFHUB::SANTOSTue Sep 06 1994 21:106
    Help!!!!!
    
    Suffering BBall withdrawal... Where was the new Celtics notes file
    moved to??
    
    Thanks in advance...
110.545where did it move?CSC32::REIGELMANTARBABYWed Sep 28 1994 22:264
    Yes could someone please point me to Celtics notes that used to be on
    VIA?? Try to access yesterday kept getting file not found.
    
    Tim
110.546new homeFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Sep 29 1994 14:523
    Tim, it's on FRETZ::BOSTON_CELTICS
    
    Mike (new host and moderator)
110.547METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Sep 29 1994 16:5510
> Tim, it's on FRETZ::BOSTON_CELTICS

> Mike (new host and moderator)

This should be submitted to SI for their Sign that the Apocalypse is Upon Us
box which they do each week.

The Crazy Met

110.548FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Sep 29 1994 18:121
    Why is that TCM?  I'm the biggest Celtic fan on the net!
110.549MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Sep 29 1994 18:174
   >> Why is that TCM?  I'm the biggest Celtic fan on the net!
     
      No, you're not. Your loyalties are split. True 'Tics fans
      have but one favrite b-ball team and the Suns ain't it. 
110.550FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Sep 29 1994 22:143
    True 'Tics fans would've done all they could to save the conference.
    
    Mike (Conference Savior!)
110.551All together, pick that nitMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Sep 30 1994 12:567
Mike, sometimes you can't win for losing.  In my eyes, you're a true
hero, even though I've never been within 3000 miles of your conference.

On the subject of lost conferences, anyone know what's up with
STKCSC::HOCKEY?

Steve
110.552you're welcomeFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Sep 30 1994 15:353
    Steve, you'll be about 400 miles from it when you land in L.A.
    
    Mike
110.553Must have a deeper meaningMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRFri Sep 30 1994 16:3310
Mike,

so what you're saying is, it's gone into exile in (I assume) Arizona.

Jeez, fans, if you can't support the notesfile, how can you support
the team??? ;-)

A parting shot...

Steve
110.554Tribute to Larry JoeFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingMon Nov 28 1994 19:34119
Article 440 of alt.sports.basketball.nba.boston-celtics:
Newsgroups: alt.sports.basketball.nba.boston-celtics
From: an153228@anon.penet.fi (Hooked on music)
Organization: Anonymous contact service
Subject: (mini-FAQ) A Tribute to Larry Bird

        _-_-                                   _-_ _,,             |\   
         /,       _                               -/  )   '         \\  
         ||      < \, ,._-_ ,._-_ '\\/\\         ~||_<   \\ ,._-_  / \\ 
        ~||      /-||  ||    ||    || ;'          || \\  ||  ||   || || 
         ||     (( ||  ||    ||    ||/            ,/--|| ||  ||   || || 
        (  -__,  \/\\  \\,   \\,   |/            _--_-'  \\  \\,   \\/  
                                  (             (                       
                                   -_-                                  
 
                           A Tribute to Larry Bird
                     What his fans have to say about him.
 
                              November 25, 1994
 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
                                Introduction
                            Why is Bird so great?
 
        Bird was probably the best all around player.  He is the only
player in the history of the NBA to average at least 20ppg, 10rpg,
and 6apg for his career.  On top of that, he was one of the deadliest
outside shooters ever, and was also one of the best ever from the FT
line.  He was an extremely smart basketball player who made his
teammates much better and was one of the top 3 or 4 clutch
performers.
 
        Bird came into a Celtics team in disarray, a team that had
only won 29 games before his arrival, and led the team to the best
record in the NBA with 61 wins, a 32 game improvement.  He also led
the team from not being in the playoffs to being in the conference
Finals with Philadelphia.  The Celtics of 79-80 didn't really add
much of significance besides Bird.  They lost a lot of players, but
really only added MLCarr and Gerald Henderson, but the primary
players (Maxwell, Cowens, Archibald, Robey, and Ford) all remained
consistent.
 
        Bird took a team that was utterly miserable, that finished
with the 2nd worst record in the NBA, and led them to a 32game
improvement, the best record in the NBA, and a conference Finals
appearance.  It was his 2nd year that he finally won the title.
 
        It's too bad that Bird has to leave the game so early.
I would have loved to see him play till he's 40 and burn up the
league when he breaks all the all-time records...
 
        What are your favorite Bird memories?
 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
          /\\,/\\,                                           
         /| || ||                              '             
         || || ||   _-_  \\/\\/\\  /'\\ ,._-_ \\  _-_   _-_, 
         ||=|= ||  || \\ || || || || ||  ||   || || \\ ||_.  
        ~|| || ||  ||/   || || || || ||  ||   || ||/    ~ || 
         |, \\,\\, \\,/  \\ \\ \\ \\,/   \\,  \\ \\,/  ,-_-  
        _-                                                   
                   Your favorite Larry Bird memories
 
I guess the most memorable time was during the playoffs against
Detroit Pistons when the Celtics were down by a few points in the
dying seconds and Isiah Thomas was throwing the ball in bound.  Bird
quickly outsmarted all players and stole the in bound pass and tossed
the ball over to Dennis Johnson for the winning basket.
 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
Shot clock winding down, Bird saves the ball from going out of bounds
on the left side of the box on the baseline.  Knows time is about to
expire so he must take a shot, but has no clear angle, so he shoots a
wicked high-arching rainbow over the back of the backboard.  Swish.
I still don't believe it.
 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
Quick jump shot from right side of the top of the key.  Bird knows
immediately the shot is too far right, anticipates the direction of
the rebound to the right baseline, runs to meet it, catches and
shoots in one motion.  Swish.  (also known as Red Auerbach's favorite
Bird play -- he said so many times).
 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
        The greatest play for me was the steal off thomas. the
greatest display was vs. dominique(Nnot to mention every game
vs.magic). But the greatest testam ent to Larry as the
toughest,gutsiest, most brilliant player I have ever seen lies in his
performance in thegame vs. Pacers?? In the playoffs where he SPENT
THE NIGHT IN TRACTION IN THE HOSPITAL and not only played thenext
day, but recorded a triple double. Unbelievable!!!! He was the
greatest I have ever seen.
 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
Bird got the ball inside with 3 sec. left but opted to dribble beyond
the 3-pt line and nail the 3-pointer just in time. The rise of his
fist after he made it, man never will forget that. But then again I
have it on tape too:-)
 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
Bird broke the consecutive free-throw shooting record just a year
before he retired.
 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
Feel free to add more to this list!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.
110.55557045::FRANCUSThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Nov 28 1994 20:464
    consecutive FT record: I am pretty sure Bird never got that record.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
110.556awesome! might have had more assists....CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Nov 28 1994 20:529
 that's right TCM. Bird realized a short guy like Murphy wasn't going to have
 any other claim to fame so he shanked it on purpose.......

 my favorite memory was a regular season game against the Lakers in the forum
 where he 36 points 21 rebounds and 5 assists. The only thing he didn't do that
 night was sweep the floor after the game.........

 mike
110.557Still raw, but with some promise...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Dec 08 1994 13:048
    
    So is it now reasonable to say that in spite of a tidal wave of
    intolerant SPROTS' prejudice, that Eric Montross looks like a competent 
    player, and at the very least a completely defensible draft pick from
    the slot which he was taken?  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
110.558slowlyHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Dec 08 1994 13:2610
Montross had a hail of a game lasted night, at least from the clips and
scores I seen. Something like 16 & 16, a tidy little double-double.

I don't know if'n he all that good considering he was standing beside
Acie and play against Koncak.

Whatever, I'm sure Knorr would say he owes it all to Dean and not going
to Indiana and Bobby Knight.

TTom
110.559CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldThu Dec 08 1994 13:595

 one good game. big deal. time will tell. I hope I was wrong....

 mike
110.560I hope there wasn't a no-trade in his last pactAKOCOA::BREENThu Dec 08 1994 14:508
    Teddy Sarandis notwithstanding and not having seen the game I'd give
    the major credit for winning last night to Dino babie'ss sore footsie.
    
    When I saw the C's a 4 point favorite over Hawks I thought Atlanta was
    the lock of the decade until I found out Dino was out.
    
    You should see solid play from C's until Radja returns then they'll be
    back to below mediocre.
110.561DZIGN::ROBICHAUDCasinoManiaThu Dec 08 1994 15:443
    	The 0 still looks too slow to play in the NBA.
    
    				/Don
110.562Ain't worth no six pickMAYES::MAILLOUXThu Dec 08 1994 17:309
    
    
    	I agree with ya /, he's Joe Kline material. All his point's except
    	for the free throws were 2 to 3 feet from the hoop. I thought
        he could shoot the ten footer in College, why does he continually
        position himself so close to the basket? 
    
    
        RM 
110.563Ironmen starting fiveTNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Thu Dec 08 1994 18:0615
    Montross was the 9th pick, not the 6th.
    
    Philly took Sharone Wright 6th.
    The Clippers took Lamond Murray 7th.
    Sacramento took Brian Grant 8th.
    
    I don't understand the harsh criticism of Radja.  Seems to me he is
    pretty solid offensively, is an OK rebounder, and needs to work on his
    defense.  He's a legitimate NBA forward, and one of the best players
    on the team, at this point in time far and away the best forward on the
    Celtics.
    
    I was amazed Chris Ford played all five starters at least 41 minutes.
    
    NAZZ
110.564TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Dec 08 1994 18:4824
    
    
    
    	Montross will never be an NBA All-Star, but I've been pretty happy
    with what I've seen so far from him. Especially compared to rookies
    drafted after him.
    
    	The only later draft picks that have shown much to date, that come
    to mind to me right now, are Eddie Jones (12th, Lakers), Wesley Person
    (23rd, Phoenix) and Michael Smith (35th!, Sacramento - steal of the
    draft so far). Eisley is playing a lot for Minnesota, but that has
    more to do with how else is there, than how well he is playing...
    
    	Is is a little early to even start evaluating last years draft.
    Many later draft picks just haven't been given much of a chance yet,
    because of who they play for (Williams & Ward of the Knicks for
    example).
    
    	The only thing I'm disappointed with from last year's draft, was
    Sacramento picking Brian Grant just ahead of the C's. He'll be a much
    better player in the long run than Montross....
    
    JimH
     
110.565ROCK::HUBERMost folks call them green onions, but they're really scallionsThu Dec 08 1994 19:156
    
    Carlos Rogers (#11, Seattle, traded to Golden State) has played
    extremely well in the minutes he's getting (about 15/game; enough
    to get some idea).
    
    Joe
110.566Why Radja? I'll try. They'll win more sans himAKOCOA::BREENNCAA: Noxious Cabal of Avarice and ArroganceThu Dec 08 1994 20:0728
    My problem with Radja is what is he?  A power forward who is lunch for
    Horace Grant?  Another Dominique (not vintage Dominique, 34 year old
    'que).
    
    I grant you his skills are NBA caliber and in another situation with 8
    interchangeable players who are coached to play as a team (Hawks are a
    good example) his skills would be better served.
    
    The player you'd like to think he is like is Bird except 
    
    Bird had the outside range and the license to take the shots
    
    Bird could rebound with the best of them
    
    The C's team (and not all of teams in nba would have) were willing to
    follow Bird and he to lead.  This is not and never will be the case
    with Dino.
    
    The final problem was the minutes were handed to Dino off his contract
    signing while X and Fox and Oscar and Pinckney and ? had to fight in
    practice for his 48 - 35 and the other 48 - that's about 60 for 5 or 15
    per man.
    
    On the other hand I'm surprised some are holding out on Montross
    (congrats Mike for your grudging "compliment?").  He seems to be this
    teams cata...(no I won't use that word again) along with X).
    
    then again I really should sit down and watch a little more than I do
110.567Wouldn't want to imagine Cs with out Dino long-termTNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Fri Dec 09 1994 13:2310
    PLEASE - don't even mention Bird and Radja in the same sentence!!!
    
    What Radja is is a very good forward with excellent offensive skills,
    and shows a certain feel for the game.  I agree with you that in a
    situation where he was on a team that would allow him not to be a main
    focal point of the offense, he would be a better player.  However, he
    is still in the top half of all the forwards in the league, and is
    quite a bargain for a second round draft choice.
    
    NAZZ
110.568So, do we take 32 wins per season for life of RadjaAKOCOA::BREENNCAA: Noxious Cabal of Avarice and ArroganceFri Dec 09 1994 19:2714
    I wasn't of course building Radja up.  The point I was making was that
    Bird's ability to rebound and shoot from 20+ feet were his key skills.
    
    What you would be referring to his unique creative ability which I
    grant, and Dino or perhaps noone will ever match.
    
    But for Dino to make an impact worthy of his salary he would have to do
    one of those two things or develop a Maxwell type of defensive ability.
    The big problem is Dino is playing power forward and the teams with
    success have guys like Grant, Oakley, Willis, Thorpe handling it.
    
    Dino has as you say good offensive skills and average on the rest.  For
    4 Mil, give me top rebounding and defense and I'll find the offense
    somewhere else.
110.569And so ends the Pervis Ellison Era...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Thu Dec 15 1994 12:460
110.570Don't get C's action in NH GlobeAKOCOA::BREENCome Monday...Thu Dec 15 1994 12:515
    Wha' happened Bob,
    	I just know they lost and I thought I heard a replay of a Rodman
    stuff which would imply ol' cabbage top played.
    
    	Don't tell me Pervis is injured
110.571CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Thu Dec 15 1994 13:0017
I was listening to the game.

In the last quarter, Ellison went off the court clutching
his knee.  He was on the bench with a towel around his 
haid, in apparent frustration.  I heard on the radio thised
morning that he was "day-to-day".

Around two minutes later, Sherman Douglas went down,
clutchig HIS knee.  Apparently he wasn't seriously injured,
as he came back in the game.

From what I saw of the highlights, Robinson made both
Montross and Earl (big surprise) look really bad.  He 
got open underneath time and time again, and both those 
guys had five fouls early in the fourth.

=Bob=
110.572of course Robinson isn't a protected speciesCNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldThu Dec 15 1994 13:085
 Atleast Rodman dyed his hair green for last night's game. Between him and JR
 the Spurs have to win the NBA's hairdressers' dream awards......

 mike
110.573another side to RodmanFRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Dec 15 1994 14:075
    Rodman's in the Christmas spirit.  Daly said recently that he's the
    only player that ever gave him a Christmas present.  He also was the
    only player to come to his house to give his family gifts.
    
    Mike
110.574Tell me it wasn't so!!!TNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Thu Dec 15 1994 16:553
    What?!?!?  David Robinson got the better of Acie Earl?!?!?!?!?
    
    NAZZ
110.575TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Dec 15 1994 16:5812
    
    
    >What?!?!?  David Robinson got the better of Acie Earl?!?!?!?!?
    
    	Hey NAZZ, don't BLAM Acie. Mr. Robison was resting comfortably on
    the bench looooong before Acie got into the game.... :-)
    
    JimH
    
    
    
    
110.576Then who is???????????????TNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Thu Dec 15 1994 17:003
    So Acie is not to blam?
    
    NAZZ
110.577No perimeter defense ...ILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersThu Dec 15 1994 18:2115
>>                        -< Then who is??????????????? >-
>>    So Acie is not to blam?
>>    NAZZ

	While David Robinson did have a big game last night against the
	Celtics (what else is new?) the "blame" for the loss has to go to
	the guards ... Avery Johnson drove to the hoop at will last night
	forcing Montross/Earl/Strong/Ellison to help out, thus leaving their
	man free for the lay down pass or the mop up rebound ... and Vinny
	Del Negro torched the C's for 25 points ... Robinson is going to
	get 30+ points many times, Johnson and Del Negro should not be
	putting up those kind of numbers ...

	Vinny

110.578B_Celtics changed locationsILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersMon Jan 16 1995 13:5317
          <<< OUTSRC::STA1:[43J.HEISER.NOTES]BOSTON_CELTICS.NOTE;3 >>>
                 -< Welcome to the Boston Celtics Conference >-
================================================================================
Note 3.16                       Conference Issues                       16 of 16
OUTSRC::HEISER "Grace changes everything"            10 lines  13-JAN-1995 13:45
                                 -< new home >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This conference will be moving to the following location this weekend.
    
    OUTSRC::STA1:[43J.HEISER.NOTES]BOSTON_CELTICS.NOTE
    
    To update your notebook, issue the following command:
    
    MOD ENTRY BOSTON_CELTICS/FILE=OUTSRC::STA1:[43J.HEISER.NOTES]BOSTON_CELTICS
    
    regards,
    Mike
110.579"seating"MKOTS3::KCUMMINGSWed Jan 18 1995 15:545
    
    
    Where in the garden is the loge section 21?
    
    thx
110.580CNTROL::CHILDSPresident of Donny Osmond FanClubWed Jan 18 1995 15:572
along one of the baselines or just behind it.........
110.581GenerallyAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeWed Jan 18 1995 19:111
    		Loge = "Good Seat"
110.582"last question"MKOTS3::KCUMMINGSThu Jan 19 1995 11:403
    
    
    Is the loge in front of the promenade for in back?
110.583MSBCS::GALVINknockemdownspinemrounheygobowlingThu Jan 19 1995 13:051
    In back!
110.584LJSRV2::KNIPSTEINThu Jan 19 1995 18:007
    Sunday, my son and I sat in Loge Section 16, Row 10 - seats were 10 rows 
    behind the scorers table, even with the foul line at the Celtics end of the
    court.  (It appeared that the Celtic wifes were seated in the next
    section over)
    
    Steve
    
110.585MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 24 1995 12:3012
      I wonder how Josh Rice feels about the 'Nique signing now.
     Right now Bostnians are getting an up close and personal look
     at why 'Nique never won a title in Atlanta. He thinks team
     means his supporting cast and hardwork is what the other guys
     have to do to get him the ball. At age 34, defense is even more
     odious than it always was and his ego as grown exponentially
     with time. Jackie MacMullan has yet another 'Wilkins is a
     problem' article today but it really was all too predictable
     that the bandaid on the chest wound wouldn't help. In this
     case it may have made things worse.
    
110.586Trade him to the Clippers! :-)ILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersTue Jan 24 1995 12:4345
	Ask and ye shall receive .. here is what Josh Rice just wrote
	to the Celtics newsgroup ..

	(alt.sports.basketball.nba.boston-celtics for anyone interested)

	Vinny

	BTW - I was against the Wilkins signing from the very beginning,
	      but I was willing to cut ML some slack, knowing that he got
	      the best free agent he could to preserve the large salary
	      slot. BUT, I was under the impression there was a one year
	      buy out clause that either party could exercise. In her
	      Nique bashing (justified, IMO) Jackie MacMullen keeps referring
	      to the three year contract but mkaes no mension of the buy out.
	      Does the buy out exist??

From: joshr@wimsey.com (Josh Rice)
Newsgroups: alt.sports.basketball.nba.boston-celtics
Subject: Re: A Look Ahead
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 1995 23:07:47
Organization: Waddaplanet
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <joshr.61.00172190@wimsey.com>
References: <atbanks-2101950531220001@h-lucio.nr.infi.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pme06.bby.wis.net
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]

In article <atbanks-2101950531220001@h-lucio.nr.infi.net> atbanks@nr.infi.net (Aaron T Banks) writes:

>I think we all can agree that this team is not going to live up to the C's
>standard and, perhaps, is bad enough to remain below average for a couple
>more years until a certain talent level can be regained.  With that in
>mind, what do the C's need to do to grasp their lofty perch atop the East
>if not all of basketball?

ML did a great job of rebuilding the demolished front line this year.  It 
is now good enough to compete for the East. IMO he has to focus on the 
backcourt - don't worry about SF for another year or two. I agree Douglas has 
no place on a winning team, and Dee should come off the bench, so we need 
starting guards. If ML can dump Sherm and X he'll have two good slots to work 
with - one free agent and one draft choice.  Hopefully by next season he'll 
have at least one of them filled.  Personally, I like Jerome Allen in the 
draft, but that's cuz I'm a quaker ;)

josh
110.587One big collection of dogsCSLALL::BRULEyou don't know what you have til it's goneTue Jan 24 1995 12:465
    Man this team is starting to resemble the "vintage 1975-1977" Celtics. 
    Wilkins and Radja are turning into Wicks and Rowe in some peoples mind.
    The C's should do Ford a favor and fire him now.
    
    Mike
110.588Wicks years were 1977-78 and 1978-79TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Tue Jan 24 1995 13:479
<<< Note 110.587 by CSLALL::BRULE "you don't know what you have til it's gone" >>>
                        -< One big collection of dogs >-

    Man this team is starting to resemble the "vintage 1975-1977" Celtics. 
    Wilkins and Radja are turning into Wicks and Rowe in some peoples mind.
    The C's should do Ford a favor and fire him now.
    
    Mike

110.589Keep 'Nique let Ford goAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeTue Jan 24 1995 14:479
    I'm finally convinced that the problem is Ford and ML has to take a hit
    and bring someone in.  Perhaps Ford has a beef about inheriting 'Nique
    if as it seems Ford didn't want him from day one.
    
    But Wilkens had changed his game after the heel problem and his team
    play was instrumental in the great season Atlanta was having right up
    to his trade.  I haven't completely made up my mind on 'nique having
    seen him in Jersey one night looking hopeless but since that debacle I
    thought there was a gradual improvement.
110.590A little heartILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersTue Jan 24 1995 16:0525
>>                          -< Keep 'Nique let Ford go >-

	Disagree. Chris Ford is doing the best he can with a marginally
	talented group of players. He has started using the only "weapon"
	he has at his disposal to try and get them to play: minutes.
	
	Eric Montross (a slow footed rookie), Rick Fox, David Wesley
	and Greg Minor are the only Celtics that play defense with
	hustle and desire. Ford sees this and has started rewarding these
	players with increased minutes.

	Dino Radja is a good (not great) offensive player but his defense
	is really weak (take a look at the stats the opposing forwards
	have been posting against Dino). Nique is pathetic on the defensive
	end (when he bothers to get back) and his offense has been reduced
	to outside jumpers. Sherman Douglas is a HUGE defensive liability
	and Dee Brown is too small to effectively guard the bigger guards
	in the league. Unfortunately, this is also the majority of the
	Celtics offense. :-(

	Boston doesn't need a new coach, they need to get some players that
	will listen to the coach they have. And it is up to ML to get those
	players.

	Vinny
110.591I like your opinions except for basic premiseAKOCOA::BREENI was all right for awhile..Tue Jan 24 1995 16:5321
    > Chris Ford is doing the best he can
    
    Agreed, I just want someone else's best.
    
    Radja, agreed.  He belongs somewhere else.  Minor, Wesley, Strong? 
    What choice do they have?
    
    Dee?	Another misfit, better suited as 6th or 7th man on a strong
    team.
    
    What about Fox?  I frankly don't know?  Was that you who called
    Sarandis last night?:-) (Caller was Fox fan).
    
    But when I see so many games where C's lose because of a lack of
    fundementals I'm willing to try something else.  Lenny Wilken's
    management traded off the core of his team but they're still well
    coached and beat the Celtics thru execution.
    
    M.L. did the honorable thing renewing Chris but C's should take the
    hit, ml should hire HIS man, trade Radja for Rauf(Abdul) and go from
    there.
110.592HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 24 1995 17:139
  Is it really worth replacing Ford at this point?

  It seems that the Celtics are going nowhere with no new talent, no
exciting players, no sense of the future. Is there anyone on the team that
would suddenly become Larry Bird or Bill Russel if they had a new coach?

  Too bad they didn't get Pat Riley before he went to the Nicks,
  George

110.593ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysTue Jan 24 1995 21:0710
    
    And what could Riley, or anyone else for that matter, have done?  The
    Celtics are better off in the long run with what they have now.  In a
    year or so they will have some decent draft picks and some good sized
    salary slots opened up.  Better this than, fpr example, a Cavs team
    that is never quite good enough to do it all, never bad enough to get
    in position to get the great player. 
    
    
    brews  
110.594ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 02:168
110.595That was a beauty!!!PCBUOA::MORGANWed Jan 25 1995 11:0912
    That right there is probably one of the most ridiculous notes I've ever
    seen.  It has to rank right up there with some of RCASO's best.  
                                                     
    "Radja is probably as good as McHale was."
    
    In case you are unaware, Groaner, McHale was one of the best defensive
    players of his time.  Radja breaks out in hives at even the mention of
    the word.  90% of the time, McHale was unstoppable down low.  Radja is
    decent down low and he's a pretty good shooter.  McHale did things that
    Radja as well as any Cleveland player, past or present, can only dream of.
    
    					Steve
110.596MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Jan 25 1995 11:1810
>    That right there is probably one of the most ridiculous notes I've ever
>    seen.  It has to rank right up there with some of RCASO's best.  
>                                                     
>    "Radja is probably as good as McHale was."
>    
>    					Steve

     I have to agree.  As ridiculous as some of his statements about the Browns
     have been, this is even more extreme.  It shows a COMPLETE ignorance about
     basketball.
110.597ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 11:3011
110.598WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 11:339
    
    
        Groaner just back away, admit that you were wrong, cuz Radja
    couldn't carry Kevin's Jock!
    
         Indiana is the greater Cleveland area????
    
    
    Chap
110.599ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 11:406
110.600CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnWed Jan 25 1995 11:415
 forget the chain yanking trap you guys keep falling into and tell us
 how's the voting is going Chappy. Getting many returns? 

 mike
110.601ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 11:416
110.602ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 11:422
110.603I HATE Pat RileyCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 11:5815
Whew, for a minute there I didn't realize that the SPROTS
shrums had taken over Groaner's mind, and thought he was
serious about the McHale/Radja thang.  .601 dispells any
notion of that.


| Too bad they didn't get Pat Riley before he went to the Nicks,
 
OVER MY DAID BODY!!  I sooner have them pull the weapon 
from my cold mangled fingers than have that phony coaching
the Celtics. (Enter standard disclaimer that I realize he
does fine with the Xs and Os, but it's his personna that
I cain't stand.)

=Bob=
110.604sad...TOOK::HALPINSteelers join the Browns in the Wait-til-next-year Club!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 12:1329
    
    
    
    	You can tell the reality of the Browns' playoff loss is just
    starting to sink in on Groaner. The denial stage is over and now he
    is into the phase where he will post outrageous notes just to keep the
    conversations away from the fact that the 'spots are watching the
    Super from home again. And the team that beat the 'spots are home too,
    which is also eating away at him.
    
    	Other harsh realities for Cleveland fans...
    
    		Mark Price has a broken wrist out for 8 weeks. The
    Cavs slide will commence soon (Postponed only because they played
    the Clippers first...)
    
    		Browns are a good football team except for the QB who
    wouldn't even bee a backup for a CFL Expansion team.
    
    		And the Indians best team since the 1940's is being wasted
    away by the strike.
    
    		The best team in Cleveland is in some 3rd world minor
    league sport and is named after a Nestle's candy bar....
    
    Poor Groaner.....
    
    JimH
    
110.605WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 12:1610
    
    
        Nope only 6 voters so far!!! Get em in boys!!!
    
    
               Groaner if your talking about people crowing about UConn in
    the Big East note, I believe it's because they are BE fans not because
    its a 'Burb of Baston!!
    
                
110.606ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 12:318
110.607WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 12:386
    
    
       Well your definely winning somethin, trust me!!
    
    
    Chap
110.608ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 13:373
110.609MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Wed Jan 25 1995 13:435
    Is there another poll going on, other than the "best xxx of 1994"?
    My <next unseen> key keeps sticking on me. ;})
    
    
    billl
110.610CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 13:485
|    Is there another poll going on, other than the "best xxx of 1994"?
|    My <next unseen> key keeps sticking on me. ;})

Yea billl, I understand you have "Best <next unseen>er" 
won in a lock.
110.611y'can't never unseen arounds hereAKOCOA::BREENOh Phu-bai, Oh Phu-bai. A helluva placeWed Jan 25 1995 14:294
    Billl it's hidden in the MikeJN Junk note about 1/15-1/21.
    
    You musta been unseening like crazy, maybe 'Saw was talking about
    playing footsies with the gov'nr or talking serious ballet or s'mthn
110.612OUTSRC::HEISERGrace changes everythingWed Jan 25 1995 17:502
110.613why am i not surprisedBSS::MENDEZWed Jan 25 1995 18:141
    
110.614ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 18:443
110.615all this for only 93 bucks what a dealCNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnThu Jan 26 1995 12:4125
 went to the game last night and all I can say is atleast in 78 & 79 when
 the team was this bad they used to allow us to smoke on the stairwells
 to ease the misery.

 the only bright spots were the play of X and Minor and catching a glimpse
 of Nazz, naturally........

 The 0 is servicable but slow and has a bad pair of mitts. Nique is now the
 crowd's whipping boy. I don't think he deserved last night as they all
 generally smelled. Dino can rebound and has few nice low post moves but
 definately as previously reported doesn't have a clue defensively. Fox
 is still lost, one minute making a heads up play next minute trying to be
 something he's not and make a dumb mistake. Brown seems only to make the 
 tough shots and it appears that they're saving Ellison for next year or he's
 in the doghouse cause he only played about 5 minutes.

 Ford's coaching left alot to be desired also. While I was happy to see him
 bench the starters for the start of second half and let the guys play who 
 were atleast giving an effort, he never took Dino off of Vaught who torched
 him and Malik Sealy was punishing the smaller guards anyway he saw fit. I
 think I'd have put Fox on him to slow him down. In all it looked like they
 were just going through the motions waiting for tee-times........

 mike
110.616ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu Jan 26 1995 14:549
110.617METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Jan 26 1995 15:184
Gotta agree; it is a best case scenario of the Celtics losing in the
first round of the playoffs and not getting a shot at the lottery.

The Crazy Met
110.618HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jan 26 1995 16:587
  If this Celtics management has a 1st pick would they know what to do with
it?

  What do you bet they'd trade it away for some 38 year old forward who was
great back in the 80's.

  George
110.619Get into the 90'sWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Thu Jan 26 1995 17:035
    
    
    
         Yup they would draft that big slow white guy Big Country and
    remain in the doldrums!
110.620like RasheedCNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnThu Jan 26 1995 17:044
 either that or pick another guy from North Carolina.........

 mike
110.621TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Thu Jan 26 1995 17:1334
    
    
>  If this Celtics management has a 1st pick would they know what to do with
>it?
>
>  What do you bet they'd trade it away for some 38 year old forward who was
>great back in the 80's.
    
    
    	Gee George, when was the last time the Celtics traded away their
    first round draft pick for a 38 year forward?
    
    	What would you have done differently last year if you were in
    charge of the Celtics' draft pick? Of the players picked after 
    Montross, who would you have picked instead? Just curious....
    
    
    	Not that I don't think the C's have not made their share of
    draft mistakes (Jon Barry, Acie Earl, Micheal Smith...), but I don't
    think they are any better or worse than the majority of the NBA at the
    Draft Crap Shoot.
    
    	You have plenty of ammo for criticising the Celtics "Braintrust",
    but but your "38-year olf forward" comment shows you have little idea
    of what the legimate complaints are.
    
    	Maybe you should stick to analyzing Figure Skating, The Americas
    Cup, and the O.J. Trial....
    
    
    JimH 
    
    
    
110.622Maybe Bird will do drafting AKOCOA::BREENThu Jan 26 1995 18:198
    Actually this was a good draft because of Montross and I've heard that
    Bird was instrumental in persuading ML (and I'm sure Red) into taking
    him.  In fact Bird is one of the few that Red would listen to.  Exactly
    how much influence Red does have is guess work; this guess is still
    plenty.
    
    Prior to that C's have been okay with the mediocre 20th round Dee and
    Fox picks, lousy with Acie and whoever I'm missing we're not missing.
110.623TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Thu Jan 26 1995 18:4729
    
    
    
    >Actually this was a good draft because of Montross and I've heard that
    >Bird was instrumental in persuading ML (and I'm sure Red) into taking
    >him.  In fact Bird is one of the few that Red would listen to.  Exactly
    >how much influence Red does have is guess work; this guess is still
    >plenty.
    
    
    	Yup, my understanding is that Bird has been primarily responsible
    for evaluation the college talent for the past two drafts (Acie Earl
    and Eric Montross). The C's made a huge mistake in drafting Earl. They
    never brought him in for a pre-draft workout because he was projected
    to be gone much earlier in the draft. Unfortunately, the teams that
    had in him for a workout knew what the C's now know, Acie is a stiff.
    
    	Hopefully, they'll never make that mistake again.
    
    	I find it hard to criticise the C's for their selection of
    Montross, given their need for a big man. And his performance relative
    to the people drafted after him. Of course, it would have been
    interesting to see what would have happened in Sacramento hadn't
    drafted Brian Grant right before Boston. He was the guy I wanted at
    that spot....
    
    JimH
    
    
110.624DZIGN::ROBICHAUDNoMoreHerosAnymoreFri Jan 27 1995 15:024
    	If the Celtics get in the lottery and pass on Gary Trent they'll
    regret it for 10 years.
    
    				   /Don
110.625Who's he???AKOCOA::BREENThe Captains and Majors and Light Colonels tooFri Jan 27 1995 15:041
    
110.626The Shaq of the MAC...DZIGN::ROBICHAUDNoMoreHerosAnymoreFri Jan 27 1995 15:101
    
110.627HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jan 27 1995 16:0311
RE          <<< Note 110.621 by TOOK::HALPIN "Jim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6" >>>

>    	You have plenty of ammo for criticising the Celtics "Braintrust",
>    but but your "38-year olf forward" comment shows you have little idea
>    of what the legimate complaints are.
    
  Right, my mistake. Boy picking up Dominique sure was a bright move, young
fast, probably just what this team needs to build a future.

  I don't know what I was thinking,
  George
110.628Poor George!! :-)TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Fri Jan 27 1995 18:1733
    
    
>>    	You have plenty of ammo for criticising the Celtics "Braintrust",
>>    but but your "38-year olf forward" comment shows you have little idea
>>    of what the legimate complaints are.
>    
>  Right, my mistake. Boy picking up Dominique sure was a bright move, young
>fast, probably just what this team needs to build a future.
    
    	I'll give you a clue George. The C's didn't trade a 1st round
    draft pick, as you implied, to get Wilkins. They signed him as a
    Free Agent. Or did you 'conveniently' forget you had made that
    statement???
    
    	I'm no fan of Dominque, but the move mostly has to be judged 
    in terms of preserving the Parish Salary Cap slot. I'll give you
    another chance to play "virtual ML Carr" (you apparently declined
    my offer to offer an alternative draft pick to Montross). Who would
    you have signed into Parish's salary cap slot last year, in order
    to keep it alive? I don't remember too many Free Agents knocking
    down ML's door trying to get into Boston last summer.
    
    	Or do you think the C's should have left the slot open, and
    have it expire at the end of this season? Now that would be a
    brilliant move!!! Probably the one you would chose....
    
    
    	Its easy to take pot-shots and then run and hide. Instead
    of offering counter-arguments with substance, right George???
    
    JimH
    
    
110.629... need some body to hate.HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jan 27 1995 19:3035
RE          <<< Note 110.628 by TOOK::HALPIN "Jim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6" >>>

>    	I'll give you a clue George. The C's didn't trade a 1st round
>    draft pick, as you implied, to get Wilkins. They signed him as a
>    Free Agent. Or did you 'conveniently' forget you had made that
>    statement???

  Regardless of the technicality of how they obtained him it's obvious that
it's a move that will take them nowhere. What future is there in Dominique?
    
>Who would
>    you have signed into Parish's salary cap slot last year, in order
>    to keep it alive? I don't remember too many Free Agents knocking
>    down ML's door trying to get into Boston last summer.

  Why sign anyone in that slot at all? Are teams required to spend up to their
cap? It might make more sense to trade for some prospects and give them some
playing time to build for the future.
    
>    	Or do you think the C's should have left the slot open, and
>    have it expire at the end of this season? Now that would be a
>    brilliant move!!! Probably the one you would chose....
    
  And so what if they did? What good is a slot if the guy they've got in it is
no better than someone who will play for 1/10th the money? It's going to take
them years to rebuild anyway, why not save the cash? 
  
>    	Its easy to take pot-shots and then run and hide. Instead
>    of offering counter-arguments with substance, right George???
    
  Exactly what's the reason for all this abuse and hostility. I'm just trying
to participate in a discussion about what is essentially a game. Why are you
giving me all this flack?

  George
110.630CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Fri Jan 27 1995 19:4512
|  Why sign anyone in that slot at all? Are teams required to spend up to their
|cap? It might make more sense to trade for some prospects and give them some
|playing time to build for the future.

Every team in the NBA is over the salary cap.  If you are
over the cap, and a player leaves your team, you must either
sign someone for the same amount, or lose the slot.  The 
Celtics signed Wilkins because they figured they would get
more for their money in that slot.  I'm not much of a 'Nique
fan these days, but I can see their logic.

=Bob=
110.631TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Fri Jan 27 1995 20:0454
    
    
    
>  Why sign anyone in that slot at all? Are teams required to spend up to their
>cap? It might make more sense to trade for some prospects and give them some
>playing time to build for the future.
    
    
    	The Celtics are hopelessly over the Salary Cap, and will be
    for years. If the C's don't fill Parish's slot, the C's lose
    the slot, but are still over the cap. By filling the slot, even with
    somebody who can't help the team in the long run, they keep the slot
    available to be filled again in the future. 
    
> And so what if they did? What good is a slot if the guy they've got in it is
>no better than someone who will play for 1/10th the money? It's going to take
>them years to rebuild anyway, why not save the cash?
    
    The C's are going to suck for several years anyway. IMHO, it is better
    to keep the slot active. Restock the team with younger players through
    the draft over the next two or three years. Then they will have
    relatively large slots (Dominque's & Reggie Lewis') to sign some
    quality FA's with just as the team is starting to rise again. If they
    let the slot expire, then they lose the option completely. Relying
    entirely on the draft for rebuilding, which is a crap-shoot (see
    the Timberwoofs, LA Clippers, and NJ Nets for examples)
    
  
>  Exactly what's the reason for all this abuse and hostility. I'm just trying
>to participate in a discussion about what is essentially a game. Why are you
>giving me all this flack?
    
    	Because I challenged an un-informed opinion on your part (that the
    C's would waste a 1st round draft pick on a 38 year forward, something 
    they have never done in the 26 years I've followed the team ), and
    instead of "participating in a discussion" you just took another pot
    shot.
    
    	I asked you for alternatives to Montross as a draft choice last
    year. You gave none. I asked you whan was the last time the C's traded
    away their 1st round pick for an aging player, and you didn't bother
    answering the question.
    
    	Basically because you made a comment that was nonsense, and I
    decided to call you on it...
    
    	Have a nice weekend...
    
    JimH
    
    
    
    
    
110.632McAdooAKOCOA::BREENFri Jan 27 1995 20:263
    He wasn't 38 but I think we traded a first round (>1) for McAdoo.  We
    managed to unload McAdoo after Brown left and ended up with McHale and
    this was done behind Auerbach's back.
110.633CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnMon Jan 30 1995 12:107
 not 1 Bill but 3 1st round picks for Mcadoo. With Bird already drafted
 but playing his senior year, Red was lipping his chops. Given that no
 one knew Magic's plans Red was leaning towards Moncrief plus till Phyllis
 George told husband Johnny to get Bob MCadoo........

 mike
110.634TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Mon Jan 30 1995 12:5219
    
    
> not 1 Bill but 3 1st round picks for Mcadoo. With Bird already drafted
    
    	Ughh! I had forgotten about that one. Not only was it three 1st
    round picks, but a player to be named later (Tom Baker, no big deal).
    
    	Fortunately, Red even made good on this in the long run. Later in
    1979, the C's sign ML Carr as a Free Agent. The Piston's were awarded
    Bob McAdoo as compensation, which both parties agreed was too much
    on Boston's part. So Detroit traded two first round picks (#1 and
    #13), which Boston later traded to the Warriors for Parish and the
    #3 pick (McHale).
    
    	So Red managed to cleanup after the ownership screwed up on McAdoo!
    
    JimH
    
    
110.635HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 30 1995 13:2123
RE          <<< Note 110.631 by TOOK::HALPIN "Jim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6" >>>

>    	Because I challenged an un-informed opinion on your part (that the
>    C's would waste a 1st round draft pick on a 38 year forward, something 
>    they have never done in the 26 years I've followed the team ), and
>    instead of "participating in a discussion" you just took another pot
>    shot.

  You are being hostile for no reason. I didn't realize that basketball teams
had to spend money that they would otherwise keep for such a stupid reason.
What's the point of forcing a salary cap on the union if it actually forces
teams to spend money keeping an expensive player on a rebuilding team who can't
possibly use the guy in the future?

  If you're saying that I'm stupid for not anticipating that the NBA would
come up with such a scheme then you've got your stupid pointer aimed in the
wrong direction.

  Is this the brilliant scheme that the NHL and Major League Baseball have
sacrificed so much to force on their unions? If it really works this way, then
that's nuts.

  George
110.636TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Mon Jan 30 1995 13:5048
    
    
>  If you're saying that I'm stupid for not anticipating that the NBA would
>come up with such a scheme then you've got your stupid pointer aimed in the
>wrong direction.
    
    
    	Get off it George. I never called you "stupid" in any of my replies. 
    Please don't go putting words in my mouth! The worst thing I said was
    that you were "un-informed". Apparently you were on at least a couple
    of points. I simply tried to correct that.
    
    	The Celtics are fair game for criticism, and are actually a fairly
    easy terget these days. But as a fan of the club, I'll defend them
    against un-warranted criticisms. (You'll notice I didn't try to counter
    the person who replied that the C's would draft another Big Slow
    guy...)
    
    	I'm also not afraid to admit, in public, that I made a mistake. The
    Bob McAdoo deal was a major goof. I had forgotten about that. I also
    happened 16 years ago and has little relevance to today's management.
    
    	I happen to like ML Carr, and as a new GM I'm willing to give him a
    little slack. He's inherited a team in chaos. He's a new GM and bound
    to make mistakes (trading 1st round draft picks for ageing forwards
    isn't one he's made yet!). Signing Wilkins as a FA was a good move,
    salary cap wise. But a poor one from a team chemistry point-of-view.
    The length of the deal (3 years) stinks too! ML also gave Rick Fox
    major bucks for 4 years, which I think was a mistake. (Dee Brown was
    Gavitt's doing, and kind of backed Carr into a corner.)
    
    	But lets give Carr some credit too. He got Radja signed to a long
    term deal under a tight deadline, whith the very real threat of Dino
    going back to Europe next year. He got Wesley in as a FA, and quickly
    snapped up Greg Minor when Indiana screwed up. He seems to be handling
    the locker room difficulties very well, backing up Chris Ford when he 
    needed it. But defending Wilkins publically when the crowd got on his
    case last week. 
    
    	I think we should give him more time, before we hang Carr out to
    dry....
    
    
    	IMHO, of course...
    
    JimH
    
    
110.637HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 30 1995 13:5911
  So does the cap really work that way? Are rebuilding teams with no chance of
winning actually forced to spend money on older players who have no chance of
helping them just to keep a salary slot? 

  Why would any league agree to such a deal much less force it on their
players (if that's what happened)? That sounds worse than not having a salary
cap at all. Unless I misunderstand, it takes away the chance of a struggling
team dumping all their high priced aging players to save money and build for
the future. 

  George
110.638METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Jan 30 1995 14:0520
> So does the cap really work that way?

The cap is based on slots for different amounts of money. Say there is a slot
that is "worth" $1 million. A team can re-sign their own player for any amount
even if they are over the cap. So say Chamberlain was put into the $1 million
slot and then later re-signed for $4 million; he is still in the $1 million
slot and if he is traded or leaves his team can only get a replacement for
$1 million if they let the $4 million stay idle for too long.

> Why would any league agree to such a deal much

Good question. But you have to remember that this was implemented 10 years ago
and I doubt anyone worried about the implications of how the cap was set up.
The goal seemed to be to allow teams to re-sign their onw players and not
be hampered by the cap. 

btw drafted players must be fit into the cap; they do not count as players that
are being re-singed.

The Crazy Met
110.639TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Mon Jan 30 1995 18:4332
    
>> Why would any league agree to such a deal much
>
>Good question. But you have to remember that this was implemented 10 years ago
>and I doubt anyone worried about the implications of how the cap was set up.
    
    	One of the reasons the "slot" rules was set up the way it is, was
    to prevent teams from deferring huge chunks of player salaries until
    the end of their careers, and then having a huge 'slot' result from
    a player's retirement. Once you fit a player into a slot, the maximum
    raise a team can grant each year is 30% over the previous year in the
    contract. A team can tear up a player's contract and grant him a new
    contract extension for bigger bucks, but the player's slot size is
    set by the original contract, not the new one...
    
>The goal seemed to be to allow teams to re-sign their onw players and not
>be hampered by the cap.
    
    	Exactly. The NBA Salary Cap was crafted to give the players the
    appearance of limited free agency. But in reality, most free agents
    tied to their team. Until the owners & agents figured out this new
    "One-year-andf-out" clause. Now players like Danny Manning can take
    a pay-cut to go to a team without a big slot. Play one year with them
    and then become a Free Agent. Because the Suns can re-sign Manning
    for any amount, they are in a sense 'creating' a salary cap slot for
    Manning.
    
    	The NBA salary cap has become a joke and should be scrapped...
    
    JimH
    
    
110.640Vdm : He's back!ILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersTue Feb 21 1995 16:214
	The Los Angeles Clippers placed guard Gary Grant on the injured list 
	Monday and signed forward Michael Smith, Boston's first-round draft 
	pick in 1989, to fill his roster spot. 

110.641SNAX::ERICKSONFifteen 2, Fifteen 4, and 3 is 5Wed Feb 22 1995 12:3119
    
    	Did Heiser have them take down node OUTSRC on purpose? I couldn't
    get to it most of yesterday. Now that the Celtics have beat the Suns
    in Phoenix. It probably won't be up and running again today. :^).
    	I only watched the first half. Dee Brown was in the zone the
    whole game. He had 27 in the first half and finished with a career
    high 41. The Celtics should practice with a 14 second shot clock.
    When they move the ball up the court and everybody is moving. They
    play so much better. I don't know if its a new play or what. In
    the first half they would bring the ball up quickly. Kick it into the
    corner for Dee. When the defense rotated, Dee would kick it to Sherman
    at the top of the key. Sherman was then mixing it up, by either taking
    the shot, driving to the hoop, or dishing it off to the weak side. They
    ran it multiple times with a ton of success. It was fun watching the
    Celtics play as a team with good rythem and motion by everybody.
    Suns didn't quite either, then got down by 25 and cut it to 11. The
    C's got it up to 20, Suns cut it to 8.
    
    Ron
110.642Lose to Clippers, but beat the Suns??ILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersWed Feb 22 1995 12:5316
	The Celtics played one of their best games of the year. They
	moved the ball on offense, stepped into the passing lanes and
	helped out on defense, and generally played with hustle and
	desire.

	Think its just a coincidence that the Dominque sat out the game
	with a sore back??

	And to give credit where credit is due, Sherman Douglas played
	great on the West Coast swing. I believe that Sherm would
	excel out West - the game is more wide open than is in the Eastern
	conference and Sherm could display more of his offensive skills
	without getting burned so bad trying to guard the bigger, more
	physical point guards of the East.

	Vinny
110.643regrouping?HBAHBA::HAASPlan 9 from Outer SpaceWed Feb 22 1995 12:543
Heiser is in hiding with his latest fack_not.

TTom
110.644C's & Suns...TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Wed Feb 22 1995 13:0461
    
    
    	Yes, finally a Celtics game worth staying up late for.
    If nothing else, I was interested in seeing if they could
    hold off the Suns 2nd half rush. For a while in the 3rd period,
    it looked like the Suns would take the game over. But the C's
    hung tough, and the Suns couldn't play the Kamakizee D for the
    whole 2nd half. After the lead got down to 8, the C's responded,
    and kept the Suns at arm's distance the rest of the way...
    
    	Here's a box score....
    
    Boston 129, Phoenix 121
    
    
    Boston
    
                       FG     3P     FT    Rebounds
    Player  Pos  Min   M-A    M-A    M-A  Off-Def-Tot Ast PF St TO Blk Pts
    Radja    F    40   5-15   0-0    3-4    1   4   5   3  4  2  2  4  13
    McDaniel F    32   5-8    1-1    6-6    3   5   8   6  4  1  2  0  17
    Montross C    35   5-6    0-0    1-7    2   8  10   2  4  0  1  0  11
    D Brown  G    47  12-21   5-9   12-13   1   4   5   7  4  1  2  3  41
    Douglas  G    31   8-15   0-2    6-6    1   5   6   7  2  1  2  0  22
    Ellison       14   4-5    0-0    0-0    2   0   2   0  5  1  0  1   8
    Wesley        17   4-6    1-1    4-4    0   0   0   2  2  3  1  0  13
    Fox           18   1-6    0-1    0-0    1   1   2   2  3  1  1  0   2
    Strong         6   0-1    0-0    2-2    2   0   2   0  0  0  0  0   2
    
    Totals       240  44-83   7-14  34-42  13  27  40  29 28 10 11  8 129
                      0.530  0.500  0.810   Team Rebs: 6
    
    
    Phoenix
    
                       FG     3P     FT    Rebounds
    Player  Pos  Min   M-A    M-A    M-A  Off-Def-Tot Ast PF St TO Blk Pts
    Barkley  F    29   4-11   0-3    4-6    1   6   7   2  3  4  4  0  12
    Green    F    38   8-15   1-4    7-9    2   4   6   1  2  0  2  1  24
    Schayes  C    21   3-5    0-0    0-0    1   3   4   3  3  0  2  2   6
    K J      G    34   9-13   0-0    3-5    0   5   5   8  3  1  3  0  21
    Majerle  G    32   9-13   1-4    4-6    2   1   3   2  3  1  1  0  23
    Tisdale       21   3-6    0-0    5-6    3   2   5   2  5  0  1  1  11
    Perry         11   3-4    0-0    0-0    2   2   4   2  1  1  3  0   6
    Kleine        14   2-4    0-0    0-0    2   5   7   1  3  0  1  1   4
    Person        14   2-8    1-4    2-2    0   0   0   1  4  0  0  0   7
    Ainge         16   2-2    1-1    0-0    0   1   1   2  1  0  2  0   5
    Lang          10   1-2    0-0    0-0    0   0   0   1  2  0  1  0   2
    
    Totals       240  46-83   4-16  25-34  13  29  42  25 30  7 20  5 121
                      0.554  0.250  0.735   Team Rebs: 5
    
    
    Boston             41   32   25   31  -  129
    Phoenix            23   31   34   33  -  121
    
    
    Technicals: Phoenix - Barkley, Head Coach Westphal.
    Officials: Paul Mihalak, Terry Durham, Blane Reichelt
    A: 19,023. T: 2:18.
    
110.645ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysThu Feb 23 1995 13:4813
    
    I was at the Suns-Celtics game, and had a blast.  Until the end of the
    3rd quarter, most of the fans there still thought the SUns were going
    to win, and were giving me crap.  It got real quiet about halfway
    through the 4th quarter, though.
    
    The Suns sure helped make the Celtics look better up front than they
    are.  They had a difficult time handling Montross underneath, and
    Wesley and Radja looked good.  
    
    Best Suns game I've been to in a while!! 8^)
    
    brews 
110.646OUTSRC::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Feb 23 1995 14:111
110.647CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Thu Mar 09 1995 18:2311
Whatta mess!!

Story in the Wall Street Journal comes out that Reggie Lewis' death is being
related to cocaine use.  Now a guy just told me that the Celtics are announcing
that they are sueing the WSJ.

All this 12 days before they are going to retire his number.

Yech!

=bob=
110.648OUTSRC::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Mar 09 1995 18:241
110.649CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Thu Mar 09 1995 18:333
|    part of the article in CELTICS.

Is that on OUTSRC:: now?
110.650OUTSRC::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Mar 09 1995 18:423
110.651The timing indeed is the biggest crimeAKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintThu Mar 09 1995 19:1012
    Bob,
    	There isn't anything new in the article, this was all in Globe
    reports published at the time and well after.  WSJ is trying to be the
    full service newspaper for the upscale and this is just another one.
    
    	They did for once get some attention as going after a Celtic Icon
    will do; I'm surprised Celtics didn't simply ignore it as wsj is not
    really mainstream and other opinion pieces of theirs have been ignored.
    
    	Mrs Lewis has denied that Reggie ever refused a drug test.  The
    assertion that he did refuse if not documented could be an area for
    damages.
110.652Story not supressed to preserve Reggie's character...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Thu Mar 09 1995 19:1511
  |	There isn't anything new in the article, this was all in Globe
  |  reports published at the time and well after.  WSJ is trying to be the
  
As I recall, Will McDonough wrote something to this effect, shortly after it all
happened.

It's all distressing, especially considering the Celtics may have suppressed the
story simply because if there were drugs involved, their insurance wouldn't have
paid out to settle Reggie's contract.

=bob=
110.653(8^)*PTOSS1::JACOBRLernin' me agin!Thu Mar 09 1995 19:218
    
    >>  <<< Note 110.652 by CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH "Potty training is hell!!!" >>>
                                 
    Yer Mom just getting around to potty training ya, eh =bob=?????
    
    
    JaKe
    
110.654CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Thu Mar 09 1995 19:283
|   Yer Mom just getting around to potty training ya, eh =bob=?????
 
Yea, they just raised the price on those damn Depends again... 
110.655Cross-posted for your reading enjoyment! ;-)TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Fri Mar 10 1995 14:1429
          <<< OUTSRC::STA1:[43J.HEISER.NOTES]BOSTON_CELTICS.NOTE;3 >>>
                 -< Welcome to the Boston Celtics Conference >-
================================================================================
Note 76.175                        SIR Reggie                         175 of 175
TNPUBS::NAZZARO "UMass to the Final Four!"           21 lines  10-MAR-1995 09:02
     -< Wall St. Journal article offers innuendos and no proof of drug u >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I have a real problem with this "story":
    
    If this reporter spent SEVEN months investigating Reggie alleged
    cocaine use, why didn't he:
    
    1) Find anyone who sold Reggie coke.
    2) Find anyone who used coke with Reggie.
    3) Find anyone who saw Reggie buying coke.
    4) Find anyone who saw Reggie using coke.
    5) Find any physical evidence linking Reggie with cocaine use.
    
    The reason is that, although there were rumors of drug use by Reggie,
    theree was NO evidence of drug use at the time of his death, and there
    continues to be none today.  Do you think the insurance compoanies
    would have paid off the policy if there was any hint of drug use?
    
    I find this story irresponsible.  I also question the timing.  It's
    hardly coinicidence this story comes out two weeks before the Celtics
    are going to retire Reggie's number.
    
    NAZZ
    
110.656OUTSRC::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Mar 10 1995 14:152
110.657USCTR1::GARBARINODean &gt; BumhiemFri Mar 10 1995 14:221
Yeah, a case of journalistic sensationalism by a sleazy rag.....
110.658True or not, this is sad...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Fri Mar 10 1995 14:2812
I think the worst part is that we don't know anything for sure.  There are facts
supporting each side of the argument, and the rumors have been around for a
while.

I'm still processing the claims of racism by the Celtics.  It's true that there
is a tendancy for the media to beleive it when drugs are connected to a black
athlete, but why, as Nazz said, did it take seven months to surface.

I dunno, I'm bumming big time about this one.  There are few athletes that I
hold in high esteem, but Reggie Lewis was one of them.

=Bob=
110.659SNAX::ERICKSONBustings over, changed again..Fri Mar 10 1995 14:3613
    
    	At least Paul Gaston isn't being greedy. If the Celtics do decide
    to sue the WSJ for $100 million. All proceeds generated from the law
    suit will go to the Reggie Lewis foundation and not into Gaston's
    pocket.
    	As for the article I havn't read it, so can't comment. As Nazz has
    said. NOBODY has come out and said I did Coke with Reggie, or I sold
    Coke to Reggie. You would think that for even publicity stunt sakes
    someone would have said it. Yet, nobody has, because Reggie was so
    respected in Boston and with the public. That nobody would trash his
    namesake even for publicity.
    
    Ron
110.660USCTR1::GARBARINODean &gt; BumhiemFri Mar 10 1995 14:463
If this is true, for me the real story is not that Reggie used cocaine,
but that the Celtics were involved in a cover-up...one in which they
gained financially.
110.661Globe: "incomprehensible that this could be racist" HorsepuckyAKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintFri Mar 10 1995 14:4724
    I am likewise boiling about the whole thing.  Shaugnessy's comments as
    well as others in the Globe, Andleman who supposedly said on his show
    that as a result of the article or the press conference that he
    wouldn't be attending the number retirment game.
    
    The central point of the story is that the condition initially
    diagnosed has a relationship with cocaine use.  This is somehow
    transposed by the article to mean (my words coming now) [that anyone
    having the condition is a coke-head unless a documented record of
    random blood tests can be compiled to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt
    that he never snorted in his life.  However, high standing in the
    community will be considered proof of non-use if the perpetrator is not
    black.  If the criminal is black then he's guilty regardless but the
    documentation would be a nice gesture.
    
    By the way, second opinions are worthless and an insult and obviously
    paid for by parties with their own financial interests at stake.  What
    financial interests? Why the sale of a radio station that does sports,
    you low-life, undereducated fool! What's the connection?!! You really
    must be an idiot.]
    
    And this is the blather from this "reputable" Journal that has
    incredibly got the state of Mass. to now investigate the coroners death
    certificate findings.
110.662What cover-up?TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Fri Mar 10 1995 15:319
    How did the Celtics gain from a coverup?  I still can't see how the
    sale of the TV station even remotely ties into this story.  ANd the
    Journal was simply incorrect in stating that drug use would have voided
    the insurance policy.
    
    I certainly have blasted Celtics management in the past, but I don't
    see any conspiracy to cover up anything here.
    
    NAZZ
110.663America's Freedom of SpeechCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Fri Mar 10 1995 16:0819
    Nazz,
    In this age of Enquiring reporting if something is out of the ordinary
    there's a coverup. Even though Doctor-patient relationships are
    supposed to be confidential, if the doctors don't answer the reporters 
    question about a patient because of this the doctor must be covering up
    something. If the C's don't tell the press everything they know, even if
    they have have no legal reason to tell them, then the C's are covering
    up fasts.
    The media today is out of control. Under the pretext of "Freedom of the
    Press" they can ruin anyone they want and claim," it's the citizen's
    right to know", or "the fans right to know" (From Shaugnessy today) or
    the "taxpayers right to know".
    I can not understand why they have dug up dirt on Lewis now. The man's
    been dead for almost 2 years, was one of the few professionals in
    Boston who has given back something to the city, and one who was a nice
    guy.  It's sickening and for the sake of his 2 children should be
    something that should go away today.
    
    Mike 
110.664USCTR1::GARBARINODean &gt; BumhiemFri Mar 10 1995 16:176
110.665CSC32::MACGREGORFri Mar 24 1995 11:385
    
    The Celtics notesfile moved to HUMANE.  What is HUMANEs DECnet address?
    
    Marc
    
110.666HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Mar 24 1995 12:0912
RE                    <<< Note 110.665 by CSC32::MACGREGOR >>>

>    The Celtics notesfile moved to HUMANE.  What is HUMANEs DECnet address?
    
  I've got

    Node Volatile Characteristics as of 24-MAR-1995 09:08:19

    Remote node =   7.286 (HUMANE)


  George
110.667OUTSRC::HEISERHoshia Nah,Baruch Haba B'shem AdonaiFri Mar 24 1995 14:056
110.668BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Mar 28 1995 18:317

	No speculation on who pilferred the jerseys?

	Kevin


110.670:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MI Love the Dorito's Babies....Tue Mar 28 1995 19:017
    
    
      I think MJ did it!! He wants 23, 45, 32, 33, 3, and 35!!!
    
    
    
    Whatta ya think MAB?
110.671Pete Rose watched the whole thingMR1PST::THEKGB::MBROOKSTue Mar 28 1995 19:083
    I was just about to enter a note saying the same thing.....
    
    JD Called and said he was an Eye Witness :-)
110.672Let's start a rumor!!! :-)TOOK::HALPINTIMEOUT!!! oops, never mind...Tue Mar 28 1995 21:184
    
    
    	I think it was Laker Ken! :-)
    
110.673ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Mar 28 1995 21:303
110.674TOOK::HALPINTIMEOUT!!! oops, never mind...Tue Mar 28 1995 21:349
    
    
    	Actually Red stole it, because he was pissed that DJ and Bird
    could be sitting arround in street clothes while the C's were getting
    their butts kicked on the court by the Bulls!!!
    
    	Their numbers are un-retired....
    
    
110.675SMARTT::CHILDSEnd Corporate Welfare Instead!Wed Mar 29 1995 11:197
 16 year old kid in Melrose had the banner. Police were tipped off by a
 high school buddy he bragged to. Police went and got the kid's dad out
 of work, went home with him searched the kid's room and found it in a
 locked duffle bag. The kid has been charge.

 mike
110.676HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 29 1995 14:1922
  The way the Celtics and police are talking you'd think the kid has stolen a
priceless work of art, not a banner that could probably be reproduced for a
couple hundred bucks. 

  Does anyone else feel that the Celtics have a case of retirement inflation
going on? That is, they seem to honor a lot of guys by retiring numbers.

  If I'm counting right they have 3 banners with 8 positions each, two full
and one half full. That's 8 + 8 + 4 or 20 retired numbers. By contrast the
Red Sox have only 4 retired numbers.

  If they keep this up it could get them into trouble. Do the Celtics use the
digits 7, 8, and 9? Basketball teams generally use the base 6 when counting so
the official can signal player number to the scorrer with the fingers on his
hands. If they are using that system then there are only 6**2 or 36 numbers
available. With 20 retired there are only 16 left. If they retire 5 more
numbers they are going to run out.

  Between calling for this kids head and retiring all these numbers the Celtics
seem to be going a bit overboard.

  George
110.677As with the OJ crimes, I suspect involvement by LearyEDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Mar 29 1995 14:4114
    What are the details on how this kid pulled off the theft?  Does he work
    for the bullhorn crew or something?  Publicly I suppose the Celtics 
    have to treat this as a deathly serious matter to discourage imitation 
    but personally I think it's pretty damn funny that a 16-year-old kid 
    could pull it off.  A_innocent pre-college prank for the ages.
    
    Mike Leary lives in Melrose, home to petty thugs and thieves; I'll have 
    to call him to see if he sponsored this thing so he'd have another 
    "Celtic" banner to fly next to that ND and IRA propaganda material he 
    hangs off his front porch... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
110.678HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 29 1995 14:4410
  From what they said on the news, at about 6PM at the end of some sort of
"Hockey open house" the kid went to the upper most seat and climbed up some
structure to get to the cat walk above the banners. He then went out over
the ice and pulled the banner up onto the catwalk, stuffed it in a duffel
bag, and made his escape.

  I forget how many feet above the ice he was but had he slipped the fall would
probably have resulted in fatal injuries. 

  George
110.679TOOK::HALPINTIMEOUT!!! oops, never mind...Wed Mar 29 1995 14:5629
    
    
>  If I'm counting right they have 3 banners with 8 positions each, two full
>and one half full. That's 8 + 8 + 4 or 20 retired numbers. By contrast the
>Red Sox have only 4 retired numbers.
    
    	George,
    
    		The C's have retired 19 numbers and 1 Name (Loscy occupies
    one of the 20 squares, he wore #18 same as Cowens).
    
>      If they keep this up it could get them into trouble. Do the Celtics use the
>digits 7, 8, and 9?
    
    		So far the Celtics have assigned numbers 0, 00, 1-35,
    40-45, 50, and 52-55. So they've used some of the 7, 8, & 9 digits. But
    have avoided some of the higher ones to date. (17, 18, 19 are all
    retired, BTW)
    
    		I don't think they are in any danger of running out of
    numbers anytime soon. After '00' goes up, it will be a loooong time
    before anyother numbers go up (except maybe Ainge's 44, I heard Red
    on WEEI last week say that he has no problem honoring Ainge when
    he retires. Red even admitted the C's made a mistake when they
    traded Danny!!!)
    
    JimH
    
    
110.680base 6 no longer appliesOUTSRC::HEISERHoshia Nah,Baruch Haba B'shem AdonaiWed Mar 29 1995 15:032
110.681HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 29 1995 15:139
  With the 7, 8, and 9 numbers available that makes more sense.

  Still it seems like a lot of numbers. Is it common for basketball teams
to have 19 retired numbers?

  Granted the Celtics have a lot of championships but to the Yankees have
that many retired numbers?

  George
110.682CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Wed Mar 29 1995 15:318
Danny Ainge's number retired.  ARRRGGGHHH!

That is a case of expansion number-retiring.  He was a decent player for a few
years, but clearly a large step down from the Big Three, (I even think DJ was
reaching a bit).  His  claim to fame, of course, is he is the all-time Celtic
leader in teeth-marks on his body.

=Bob=
110.683Base 6 no moHBAHBA::HAASrecurring recusancyWed Mar 29 1995 16:168
Mike,

Mysteriously, the league permitted big George and that Skinny Stiff to
wear those 7n numbers.

I never did see where or when the league changed its rules.

TTom
110.684ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysWed Mar 29 1995 17:148
    
    George,
    
    Given the number of Championships the Sox have vs. the Celtics, I don't
    have a problem with 19+1 #'s retired.  Heck, the Suns have four
    retired.  Who would you retire Alvin Adams or Danny Ainge?
    
    brews
110.685MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Mar 29 1995 17:183
	Even if it were still base-6, looking at the Celtics roster and
	their recent drafts, I'd say they'd still have numbers available
	until well into the next century.
110.686Bill and Danny in the same rafters? my heart couldn't take itSMARTT::CHILDSEnd Corporate Welfare Instead!Wed Mar 29 1995 17:334
 if they retire Ainge's number, I'll be joining Reggie sooner than expected...

 mike
110.687If Mchale, Parish and Reggie deserve it so does heSMARTT::CHILDSEnd Corporate Welfare Instead!Wed Mar 29 1995 17:367
 and the Ainge things smacks of goody goody whitey two shoes all over. Heck
 Mad Max did more than Ainge ever did for this franchise and I don't here
 Red talking about him. Next thing you know it'll be one-year Bill who's
 worthy of the honor.........

 mike
110.688Put em all up thereAKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintWed Mar 29 1995 17:405
    How about Larry Siegfried and Bailey Howell not to speak of Arnie
    Risen.  Risen's now in the hall and played for the '57 team.  
    
    Charley Scott, Paul Westphal?  Silas, Chaney?  Clyde Lovellette?  Heck
    John Thompson.
110.689ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysWed Mar 29 1995 17:425
    
    Westphal's hanging in Phoenix, believe it or not.  How about Hambone
    Williams?  
    
    brews
110.690OUTSRC::HEISERHoshia Nah,Baruch Haba B'shem AdonaiWed Mar 29 1995 17:551
110.691HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 29 1995 18:0816
RE    <<< Note 110.684 by ONOFRE::MAY_BR "pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys" >>>

>    Given the number of Championships the Sox have vs. the Celtics, I don't
>    have a problem with 19+1 #'s retired.  Heck, the Suns have four
>    retired.  Who would you retire Alvin Adams or Danny Ainge?
    
  That's why I was asking, how many numbers have the Yankees retired? Seems
they, like the Celtics, have lots of championships. Have they got 20 retired
numbers?

  Seems it would be easy to find at least 20 guys that contributed as much to
Yankee championships as D.J. did for the Celtics. Wasn't D.J. the point guard
for the '86 championship only? Seems Nate Arch-in-something-or-other was point
guard for the early 80's championship team.

  George
110.692Names from the pastTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Wed Mar 29 1995 18:1313
    Glenn McDonald - he was THE man in the 3rd overtime in 1976.
    
    Nate (Tiny) Archibald was the PG for the 1981 championship team, and
    Chris Ford was the shooting guard!
    
    NAZZ
    
    PS - When are the Red Sox going to retire Frank Malzone's number?  Or
    Jackie Jensen's?  How about Pete Runnels?  Dare I bring up Wade Boggs?
    Then there's Jim Lonborg, Dom DiMaggio, Rico Petrocelli, Dick Radatz,
    I could go on and on.  But they most definitely should retire #25 for
    Tony Conigliaro.
    
110.693OUTSRC::HEISERHoshia Nah,Baruch Haba B'shem AdonaiWed Mar 29 1995 19:111
110.694I'll have to show it off at the nexted GTCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Wed Mar 29 1995 19:573
Bailey Howell wore number 18, so in a sense his number is retired.

I carry Bailey's autograph with me in my wallet - he was my firsted Celtic hero.
110.695Chuck ConnersWMOIS::REEVE_CThu Mar 30 1995 13:231
    
110.696IMBETR::DUPREZTue Apr 18 1995 14:1514
Any idea what's behind this late Celtics surge?

Is it due to:
	o  a generally "soft" area in the schedule
	o  an actual improvement in their play
	o  more intensity than their opponents (because they need the #8 slot)
	o  all of the above

I suppose what's most surprising is that they're still doing
well without Montross.  I hope this all helps to keep Chris Ford's
job - I think he's doing pretty well.

Roland
110.697a relationship?HBAHBA::HAASYou ate my hiding place.Tue Apr 18 1995 14:225
Montross goes down and the Celtics win 8 of 9?

Yeah, must be good coaching ;-)

TTom
110.698IMBETR::DUPREZTue Apr 18 1995 14:3813
I don't believe he's been out for the whole "streak", probably 
more like half.

I like whipping NC alums as much as the next red-blooded noter,
but Montross has been a fairly pleasant surprise.  He's big and
strong (notice I didn't say fast), and the Celts tend to get beat up 
more than usual inside when he's not there.

I personally believe that Ford is a pretty good coach.  How much can
you do when your marquee player is Dominique "5 for 21" Wilkins?  After
Dee Brown, name a Celtic that you'd die to have as one of your top 6 or
7 players...
110.699Ford may go?HBAHBA::HAASYou ate my hiding place.Tue Apr 18 1995 15:014
Rumors have Ford leaving or being asked to leave Boston and headed to
Detroit.

TTom
110.700HOLY SWEATSOCK SNARFOUTSRC::HEISERnext year in Jerusalem!Tue Apr 18 1995 15:491
110.701here's a fewCNTROL::CHILDSTue Apr 18 1995 15:5110
    
     The return of Derek Strong.
    
     X blasting the bums for being sissies.
    
     the improved play of Sherman Douglass.
    
     dino's defense.
    
     mike
110.702Let me tell you the waysAKOCOA::BREENTue Apr 18 1995 16:0420
    Dino requested 6th man status and got it, Sherm was allowed to do his
    own thing, X and Nique shared time (latter had to earn his), Dee has
    played fairly well since January, Strong has played well.
    
    Mainly Celtic's want to make playoffs and their best competition Miami
    and NJ are disgraces as franchises.  Detroit wasn't ready and Bucks
    came on too late (it's not over).
    
    Maybe the C's players wanted to make the playoffs just to pissoff their
    disgruntled fans who seemed to want them to get lottery picks -
    ironically their inspired play led to a prolonged standing ovation for
    the effort shown showing the C's fans do want the playoffs.
    
    And finally success breeds fan recognition which in turn gets the old
    home advantage back.  This cycle had to be restarted.
    
    And Montross back will give C's slim but better than none chance with 
    Magic who are ripe for taking.  My NBA slant is marketing and PR rule
    and a Shaq vs Michael matchup to follow a Bull-Knick ratings bonanza is
    scripted so a Celtic victory would have to shut me up.
110.703IMBETR::DUPREZTue Apr 18 1995 16:1427
RE: .701
   
>     dino's defense.

Isn't this an oxymoron?

RE: .702 
   
>    And Montross back will give C's slim but better than none chance with 
>    Magic who are ripe for taking.  My NBA slant is marketing and PR rule
>    and a Shaq vs Michael matchup to follow a Bull-Knick ratings bonanza is
>    scripted so a Celtic victory would have to shut me up.

Well, you know, Bill, maybe the league is trying to get rid of some of
the "young punk" criticism and trying to restore a measure of "Celtic mystique".
They could also be capitalizing on the close of Boston Garden.  At least I
think that's what your new conspiracy angle will be if the Celts beat
Orlando... :-) :-) :-)

Where has Strong been?  I recall seeing him earlier in the season, and then
it seemed like he disappeared.  Was it injury, or just another charity donation
to the Dominique Wilkins Minutes Fund?

(Can you tell I'm unimpressed with Dominique?)

Roland

110.704ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysTue Apr 18 1995 16:185
    
    If Ford goes to  Detriot (tm), it'd be a natural for Nellie to return
    to Boston.  Makes too much sense.
    
    brews 
110.705Nice Spin there R, mind if I use it?AKOCOA::BREENTue Apr 18 1995 16:233
    Roland, you are are wise man indeed for one who has lived less than
    five decades :-)   I was thinking just that and couldn't top the spin
    you came up with at my best.
110.706CNTROL::CHILDSTue Apr 18 1995 16:457
    
    The only topper would be facing the Lakers in the finals........
    
    well Dino was actually spotted playing defense one game which is
    more than any previous output......
    
    ;^)
110.707OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaTue Apr 18 1995 18:055
110.708Rumor du jourILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersTue Apr 18 1995 18:3423
	Another ex-Celtic helping the rumor wheel .. pulled this 
	from the ESPNET Sportszone ...

o Will Kevin McHale's first deal as GM of the Timberwolves be with his old 
  club, the Celtics? It seems the possibility of trading Christian Laettner 
  for the Celts' No. 1 pick and change is a likely scenario.

	Trade makes sense from both sides .. the Celtics need an infusion
	of YOUNG talent and they would like to fill one of the big salary
	slots (Jay Humphries, Xavier McDaniel) they have opening up at the 
	end of the season with quality player (and this years free agent 
	crop is supposed to be thin). Laettner could move into the starting
	power forward spot and Dino Radja could keep the sixth man spot
	that he has assumed the past few weeks. The C's would still need
	a small forward.

	From the Timberwolves perspective, they have two players playing the
	same position (Laettner and Gugliotta), Laettner does not get along
	with Rider, and they may need the salary cap slot to sign this years
	top draft pick (which should be in the top three).

	Vinny	

110.709WMOIS::BALL_KWed Apr 19 1995 15:5112
    Re:  Laettner for a 1st round choice
    
    I disagree that this trade makes (any) sense.  What does Laettner
    give you that Dino doesn't (how many slow PF's with limited defense can
    you play at one position). The only reason I'm not objecting more is
    that the !st round pick isn't a lottery pick (will probably be around
    15th) and there won't be any significant talent left anyway. So if
    they do make this deal they might as well unload Dino (assuming
    Laettner give you a little bit more offense and potential even though 
    he is a head case)
    
    						KB
110.710where is it?????CSC32::REIGELMANTARBABYThu Apr 20 1995 06:097
    Can someone please tell me if the CELTICS notes files has been move 
    again????  I keep getting Remote node is not currently reachable when
    I try to access them...
    
    
    Thanks
    Tim
110.711CSC32::MACGREGORThu Apr 20 1995 13:035
    
    The CELTICS notes file is now on HUMANE::
    
    Marc
    
110.712MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon May 01 1995 14:1524

      I'd like to believe that Jackie MacMullan is a some
     kind of motivational genius and wrote yesterday's art-
     icle ripping Chris Ford and the Celtics with the sole
     intent of lighting a fire under the team. I don't be-
     lieve it, though. Never been a fan of Jackie's and yester-
     days article was a indicative of just why. Yes, the Celts 
     looked pathetic Friday. And yes, it was embarassing for
     them, us fans and the entire organization but it was 
     *one* game. One gad-awful game but just one game. Jackie
     said that the team "tunes Ford out" and he "tunes them out" 
     in turn. Not yesterday they didn't. The Celts had a plan
     that they executed to perfection. Everyone was on the same
     page, everyone had a job and did it. Jackie should go
     back to doing the rote game summaries and leave the diagnoses
     and insightful commentary to Peter May or Bob Ryan. As for 
     Chris Ford, I have no problem with Chris as coach. You can't 
     win a sled race with one dog and the Celts barely have that. 
     It's 1-1 and the Magic are still the heavy faves but maybe
     they're like a Lennox Lewis or Mark Breland. Dominating fighters
     until serious adversity comes their way and then they can't
     handle it because they've never had to.
    
110.713IMBETR::DUPREZMon May 01 1995 14:508
Is the 5-game playoff format 2-2-1?  If so, game 3 of Magic/Celtics will be
*huge*, given that the Celts took one in Orlando.  If I were the Magic, I
wouldn't want to be in the position of *having* to win game 4 in the Garden -
there would be pandemonium.

Of course, there's a very good chance that the Magic could abuse the Celts
in game 3 like they did in game 1.
110.714exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon May 01 1995 14:554
  >> Is the 5-game playoff format 2-2-1?  
    
     Yup, Wednesday and Friday at the Garden. It's gonna be a-rockin'.
110.715They're goin' down !USCTR1::GARBARINOMon May 01 1995 15:137
>Of course, there's a very good chance that the Magic could abuse the Celts
>in game 3 like they did in game 1.

Highly unlikely.  Orlando hasn't abused anyone on the road this year, and
are on a 7-game road losing streak.  Given their wobbly-kneed performance
last year, my guess is they'll be lucky to get out of the Gahden and back
to Orlando for Game 5.
110.716thised yearHBAHBA::HAASYou ate my hiding place.Mon May 01 1995 15:168
You don't have to go back to lasted year to see a "wobbly-kneed
performance" outta the Magic. Sunday was quite fine, thank you very much.

Orlando couldn't dunk it in the 4th quarter.

Of course having Sherman and 'Nique unconscious didn't hurt none, too.

TTom
110.717She certainly didn't pull any punchesAKOCOA::BREENMon May 01 1995 15:3915
    Tommy, I read that article and wondered if there's a crow note for the
    glove pundits.  She certainly stuck her neck out and can only hope that
    the Magic can blow out the Celtics at least once at the old garden.
    
    After Leslie Visser's BC coverage in the 70s I was leery of Jackie; it
    probably helped that I didn't know her sex until I'd read some
    articles.  I give her credit for stating a strong opinion and hope that
    if the Celtics prevail she does the crow routine.  Perhaps the victory
    Sunday has killed her position entirely.
    
    Any Celtic fan should be leery of home blowouts as the C's blew out LA
    in '85 game 1 and lost #2 not to speak of easy wins against the Knicks
    at home in games 1 and 2 and defeat in game 5 (1990?).  Jackie had a
    line a few columns back that had me rollin so unless Ryan wants to come
    back I'll give her some slack on this one.
110.718CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Mon May 01 1995 16:2210
    I was a big Jackie Mac fan until last May. IMHO She started a one person 
    campaign for the extension of Chris Ford's contract which put ML Carr
    and Gaston in a tough public position. I thought at the time she was
    Ford's agent. The last straw was her tearing down of Reggie Lewis and
    the Celtics just before Reggie's number was raised. When the coroner's
    final result was released and her (and the Globe's) position that the
    death was from cocaine was proven incorrect there wasn't one
    retraction.  
    
    Mike
110.719AKOCOA::BREENMon May 01 1995 17:0614
    The Celtics and Ford remind me a little of the Boston College situation
    in '94 when they had a terrible BE tourney and then the big NCAA wins
    which forced Gladchuck to extend O'Brien's contract.  Knocking off
    Orlando would be big and give them the Magic's #1 seed path leading to
    the 4,5 winner where with Bulls and Bugs anything could happen with a
    key injury.
    
    I see no chance vs Knicks.  Also, Ford is probably gone no matter what.
    
    Did the Glove have any unified postion on Lewis?  I thought the many
    writers covered every opinion with any consensus being "What does it
    matter? Leave it alone".  I do agree that given the scenario which
    preceded it that the coroners autopsy finding review should have been
    front page with a clear message "Lewis detractors proven WRONG!!!".
110.720Being a columnist means never having to say you're wrongTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Mon May 01 1995 17:1820
    You knew the Globe wasn't gonna do that; in fact, they even bent the
    other way with Will "The Shill" McDonough's blast after the coroner's
    report, which said in effect of course the coroner is going to say that
    the cause of death wasn't cocaine-involved because that was the easy
    way out and that the coroner's office shouldn't investigate their own
    findings.
    
    Anyway, back to the Celtics-Magic series.  I had much more of a problem
    with Dan "Mr. negative" Shaughnessy's two articles this weekend.  He
    seems determined to slam the Celtics mercilessly at every opportunity.
    Sure they sucked Friday night, but that doesn't mean the team is a
    joke, that the players have no pride, that the series is a mismatch of
    incredible proportions, and that the Celtics shouldn't even bother to
    show up on Sunday.  And of course, not one "I was wrong" in today's
    collumn, only what a stunner it was.  Gee Dan, how much would it hurt
    that massive ego of yours to come out and admit that you were wrong? 
    Guess I don't have to worry about it, because between you and
    McDonough, it will never happen.
    
    NAZZ 
110.721MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon May 01 1995 17:5429
   >> Anyway, back to the Celtics-Magic series.  I had much more of a problem
   >> with Dan "Mr. negative" Shaughnessy's two articles this weekend.  He
   >> seems determined to slam the Celtics mercilessly at every opportunity.
    
      It was standard Shaugnessy fare, written not so much to enlighten
      as to provide an opportunity for Dan to get off a string of one-
      liners and to show us all just how clever he is. I learned to tune 
      Shaugnessy out a long time ago. It simply amazes me that he manages 
      to rack up the writing awards when it's obvious that he's a cheap 
      imitation of the political writer for the Times (whose name escapes 
      me) who is much more cynical *and* funny. Dan can't write an article 
      about Boston's playoff opposition in whatever sport without ripping
      off a string of one-liners about the city itself (Orlando - "The 
      Worcester Of Central Florida") as if that's somehow relevant. And
      all the jokes are basically the same for every city. It gets worse 
      when he has easy targets like Pittsburg or Cleveland. Apparently,
      Dan's under the mistaken impression that Boston is some kind of 
      cultural Utopia and he's our own little Mark Twain. Jackie, on the
      other hand, is the Globe's basketball writer and I'd expect her to
      be more level-headed and analytical but she was just chopping and
      slashing yesterday. It was way, way, way overboard.
    
    
      BTW - nice how Shaugnessy says "we" laughed when the Celts said
            it was only one game and they'd have to make adjustments.
            "We"? You're right, Nazz. Being a columnist does mean never
            having to say you're wrong but on the rare chance that you
            are, you don't admit it you just say *we* all were.
110.722PCBUOA::LEFEBVREA Repo Man is always intenseMon May 01 1995 18:013
    Shaughnessy has chronic "let me show you how hip I am" disease.
    
    Mark.
110.723AKOCOA::BREENMon May 01 1995 18:042
    Well I thought I caught a tone of sheepishness in Shill's tone but nary
    a word of remorse from JM except some Ford lauding.
110.724told yaOUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaMon May 01 1995 20:038
110.725MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon May 01 1995 20:094
    
       Typical Mikey. Celebratin' after one victory in a five game 
      series. I want the Celts to win to but it's a long road as those
      of us, who are fans of teams that have actually won titles, know.
110.726Celtics in 4OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaMon May 01 1995 20:325
110.727MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon May 01 1995 20:456
    
  >> Real Celtics' fans aren't hedging on their team now.
    
     'Real Celtics' fans' haven't elected a Suns fan as our spokeman.
      None of us is convinced that this team *will* beat Orlando. 
      "Could"? Yes. "Will"? Not so sure.
110.728OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaMon May 01 1995 20:559
110.729MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue May 02 1995 16:2812
      Jackie MacMullan, in a pretty classy move, starts off 
     today's column with "I take it all back." In the past
     week we've had Mike Barnicle (and several SPORTSnoters)
     calling for bombing the Middle East, a kid wrongly ac-
     cused of making bomb threats and cast into the glare of 
     the media spotlight and every sports columnist in town 
     ripping the Ford and the Celtics. Of all those newspeople,
     Jackie was the only one who had the guts to come forward
     and admit she was wrong. Still not a fan of her writing 
     style but her personal style is first rate.
    
110.730Winning this series would be SO sweet!TNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Wed May 03 1995 18:1215
    She is a very classy lady.  I think her main problem is too many years
    of sharing the same newsroom with the likes of McDonough and
    Shaughnessy.  
    
    As for tonight, I'd like to see the Celts win, but I am not very
    confident.  In fact, I think it's more likely that the Magic will win
    in four than the Celtics.  I would like to see a better effort out of
    Montross.  Seems like he has not recovered from that injury he suffered
    back in March.  I have a feeling the Magic will try to get Shaq
    involved early and often, and Montross is going to have to step up for
    the Celtics to win.   Will we see the Sherm and Nique of Game 1 or Game
    2?  Who knows?  this is a very hard game to predict, but I am hoping
    for the best.
    
    NAZZ
110.731sand bag alert!HBAHBA::HAASterminal deliriumWed May 03 1995 18:130
110.732USCTR1::GARBARINOWed May 03 1995 18:185
>    As for tonight, I'd like to see the Celts win, but I am not very
>    confident.

They're a lock tonight.  Orlando is crumbling.  Such is the life of
style-without-substance.
110.733KOD alertHBAHBA::HAASterminal deliriumWed May 03 1995 18:190
110.734Not coming from a Knicks fanWMOIS::REEVE_CWed May 03 1995 18:201
    
110.735CNTROL::CHILDSHarry Browne in 96Wed May 03 1995 18:3911
    
    like Nazz, I think tonight is a tough one to call but if they do
    win than game 4 should be a lock
    
    Sure would be nice if someone would teach Montross how to rebound 
    with two hands!!!!!
    
    I think Sherm can play like game 2 but Nique's a tough call. One thing
    for sure he's going to try and be the man, hopefully he is....
    
    mike
110.736hope the scorekeeper aintHBAHBA::HAASterminal deliriumWed May 03 1995 18:4110
from the local rag:

"Boston Garden fans, subdued and sometimes surly toward the Celtics this
season, have reason to roar again as Boston faces the Orlando Magic
tonight."

Fans "sometimes surly"? I thought Sherman Douglas was the "sometimes
surly"?

TTom
110.737CAMONE::WAYUSS Largato SS-371, In MemoriamWed May 03 1995 18:558
>Fans "sometimes surly"? I thought Sherman Douglas was the "sometimes
>surly"?

No.  He's "sometimes Shirley"....


hth,
'Saw
110.738especially in the GahdenOUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaWed May 03 1995 20:471
110.739MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu May 04 1995 13:592
    
      Mike Heiser's KOD > Garden Mystique
110.740Seies likely to go back to Orlando SundayTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Thu May 04 1995 14:3131
    Well, the Celtics had a chance but couldn't shoot to save their lives -
    only 31% from the field - as the Magic take the upper hand in the
    series 82-77.
    
    Several key plays down the stretch.  Celts up 77-74, with 2:18 left. 
    They miss their last eight shots, don't score again.  Nique takes an
    ill-advised 3, Magic get ball, Hardaway tries to force up a shot, Sherm
    strips him, it goes right to Anderson, who hits a 3!  Tie game.  Celts
    miss a shot (I forget who), Nique gets the rebound, Penny comes out of
    nowhere to block the shot.  On Magic's next possession, Scott misses an
    open jumper, Shaq slams in the rebound - one of his 21 boards.  Ellison
    (who had an excellent game) then misses an open baseline jumper that
    would have tied it up, Anderson makes one of two free throws, Celts
    only down 3.  Dee misses a 3-pointer, Nique tries to slam in rebound
    (WHY?????), misses, ball bounces back to Dee who heaves up a long 3 off
    the front rim - ball game.
    
    Sherm slipped back to his game one level (4-16 from the field), Nique
    was 4-6 on 3-pointers, but 0-8 inside the arc, Montross was invisible
    again (3 pts, one reb. in 13 minutes), and X again showed his career is
    over.  I kinda feel for X - he's trying, but his tank is on empty.
    
    On the plus side, Dee was decent, Dino was scoreless in the first half
    but finished with 15 and outplayed Horace Grant (Grant had only 6
    points and 5 reb).  Ellison and Strong both played well off the bench
    (Pervis 8 pts, 10 reb, 3 blocks, Derek 6 pts, 8 reb, 1 block).  Boston
    pounded the glass for 21 offensive rebounds and outboarded the Magic
    50-45.  Also, the crowd was REALLY into the game, as loud as I've heard
    it in several years.
    
    NAZZ
110.741USCTR1::GARBARINOThu May 04 1995 14:548
>     and outplayed Horace Grant (Grant had only 6 points and 5 reb).

I see Grant had one of his playoff no-shows (again).  And he was supposed
to bring some kind of veteran, championship leadership to this team.
Ha!, what a joke.  This guy made a career off of Jordan and Pippen.
He played his best ball of his life last year against the Knicks,
and got himself a nice contract.  But as evidenced by his performance
last night, he's back to his ol' self again.
110.742CNTROL::CHILDSHarry Browne in 96Thu May 04 1995 15:296
    
    actually Nazz, it was a pass along the baseline to Nique for the
    blocked finger roll not a missed a shot. Dam he should have jam
    it!
    
    mike
110.743complete the equationOUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaThu May 04 1995 15:483
110.744You talking about Horace Grant?AKOCOA::BREENThey don't make Chews like Charlston any more..Thu May 04 1995 16:186
    You sure it wasn't Jordan and Pippen riding Grant (and Cartwright with
    an assist from Jayson Williams).  I think Grant is playing injured and
    when healthy wins his battles against them all.
    
    I hardly saw anything but sterling performance from him in the Phoenix
    series but his work was the trencherwork not the glamour stuff.
110.745USCTR1::GARBARINOThu May 04 1995 17:1515
>                      -< You talking about Horace Grant? >-

>    I think Grant is playing injured and when healthy wins his battles
>against them all.


My comments on Grant (mostly in CELTICS) go back a few years.  They're
based mostly on matchups against Oakley, in which Oak's eaten him up
on the boards.  Grant's best playoff series (IMO) was last year's series
vs. NY, and the key to that was his taking his game outside and hitting
jumper after jumper.  I believe he's not the "power" forward or impact
player people believe he is.

And having a big series against Phoenix doesn't impress me either.
Who doesn't ?
110.746They miss em and Orlando would a lesser team without himMR1PST::THEKGB::MBROOKSThu May 04 1995 18:134
    Well I for One would love to see Grant back in Chicago right now :-)
    Do the bulls have any PF :-)
    
    						mab
110.747ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sat May 06 1995 11:566
110.748Celtics blow late 4th quarter lead, fitting end to GardenROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Sat May 06 1995 11:587
110.749Ford fired! Film at 5!BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed May 17 1995 20:056

	Ford canned.  Didn't the Bruins fire their coach too?  Bad day to be
	a Boston coach.

	Kevin
110.750USCTR1::GARBARINOWed May 17 1995 20:333
>                          -< Ford fired!  Film at 5! >-

Maybe you'll get Riley....
110.751HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed May 17 1995 20:463
  Bring Red out of retirement.

  George
110.752MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed May 17 1995 20:4617
    
     >> Maybe you'll get Riley....
    
        Why would we want him? For my money, the Celtics fired the wrong
        guy. ML Carr is no more equipped to lead the Celtics to another
        (see that word, Groaner? *ANOTHER*) title than he is to dance the
        lead in Swan Lake. The Domonique move blew up in his face,
        the Jordan overture was an embarassment and for some unknown
        reason he has this incredibly optimistic outlook on the team when
        everyone else can see that they're second-tier all the way. We
        need a sharp fron office guy. And no, Mike Heiser don't bring up
        Jerry Colangelo and his band of good but not great band of sad-
        assed mercenaries who have banded together to win the title that
        none of then was good enough to lead a team to by themselves which
        pretty much describes Colangelo and westphal as well. No, something 
        along the lines of a Jerry West will do just fine.
    
110.753OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaWed May 17 1995 21:157
110.754Larry BirdAKOCOA::BREENWed May 17 1995 21:197
    What thinkest y'all about the chance of ML taking over the whole thing.
    It would seem a likely choice and make the 1.6 mil moot assuming ML
    doesn't want a whole lot extra for doing both jobs.  And ol' Gavitt is
    around (as well as Volk and even Red) to take care of the mundane.
    
    Plus ML wouldn't have to hire someone quick as coach prior to the
    draft to get input.  Of course another thought for coach is... 
110.755OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaWed May 17 1995 22:242
110.756ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu May 18 1995 11:147
110.757CNTROL::CHILDSJJS the BucketsMasterThu May 18 1995 11:3814
    
     I'm glad Ford's gone myself. I was never impressed with coaching
     style. I don't believe he had a feel for the game or his player.
     He was a textbook coach. I do agree though that while M.L. is a
     heck of a nice guy he hasn't demonstrated the smarts to run the
     ballclub.
    
     I'd like to see Nellie here but given the way Red holds a grudge
     and the other available posistions out there I don't see it happening.
    
     It'll never happen but if I could have my choice of any coach, I'd
     love to see Bobby Knight in green........
    
     mike
110.758BIGQ::MCKAYThu May 18 1995 13:194
    Mikey,
    	How about Big John Thompson????
    
    Jimbo
110.759USCTR1::GARBARINOThu May 18 1995 13:246
>     It'll never happen but if I could have my choice of any coach, I'd
>     love to see Bobby Knight in green........

Unfortunately Mike, there's more to a pro coach than knowing the X's and O's.
His abuse of the media is one reason alone that he'll never coach (or last)
in the pros.
110.760I'm taking a little Ewing on that quoteAKOCOA::BREENThu May 18 1995 13:408
    I disagree.  The nba is all about making money and Knight would be a
    big seller and his punching out of reporters (an easy prediction) would
    be followed by "fines" and a lot of publicity.
    
    To paraphrase an old Punch Imlach quote
    
    [']	If they don't stop throwing chairs they'll sell out those arenas
    every night[']
110.761Can't truly judge ML for at least another 12 monthsTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Thu May 18 1995 14:5816
    Re. a few back:  Why was the Michael Jordan overture an embarrassment?
    I would have done exactly the same thing.  ML had absolutely nothing to
    lose in trying to get Jordan.  While I agree some of his moves have
    been, er, ah, questionable, in other cases he has done well (picking up
    Greg Minor, dumping Blue Edwards quickly and getting a high #2 pick and
    a $1.9 million salary slot for him).  Overall, it still is too early to
    judge how well ML is doing in his job.  Who he hires for a coach, who
    he drafts, if he exercises the option and dumps X, if he gets rid of
    Foox to Toronto, how he fills X's and Humphries big salary slots, and
    how this remade team plays next year should be the determining factors
    in judging how well ML does his job.
    
    As for the coach, I'd love to see Dave Cowens bring his passion and
    fire to the Celtics.  If he coaches like he played.....
    
    NAZZ
110.762MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu May 18 1995 15:4416
  >> Re. a few back:  Why was the Michael Jordan overture an embarrassment?
  >> I would have done exactly the same thing.  ML had absolutely nothing to
  >> lose in trying to get Jordan.  

     It was a ridiculous publicity stunt. But let me be perfectly honest, 
     I've never liked ML. Not since his thug days as the 'Tics enforcer and
     not all through his butt-smooching climb to the top of the heap. No
     one took his Jordan overture seriously. ML may as well have been
     leaving the porch light on for Elvis. Then there's the signing of
     Domonique who went on to prove himslef a has-been all season and 
     slapped an exclamation point on that statement with missed free
     throws that ended a pretty run in the playoffs. It's a little
     early to be judging ML but he hasn't imspire any confidence as far
     as I'm concerned.
    
110.763Playoffs have to equal success for ML, ChrisAKOCOA::BREENThu May 18 1995 15:4511
    Getting the mess which was the 1993 Celtic team up a notch to the final
    playoff spot was quite an accomplishment for both levels of management
    (Ford,ML).  While the non playoff teams were still actively competing
    it was fairly evident that no single team in the league, including the
    Clippers and TWolves could be considered lesser talent wise than C's
    and the Heat and Nets quite superior.
    
    Now ML has to find a way to equalize the number of teams passing the
    C's on the way up (Bullets,Mavs,Bucks,Warriors) with a few to pass in turn 
    on the way down (cleveland,atlanta,???? - you got me?).
    
110.764ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Thu May 18 1995 16:475
110.765I'm never quite sure, but...USCTR1::GARBARINOThu May 18 1995 17:455
>    Now ML has to find a way to equalize the number of teams passing the
>    C's on the way up (Bullets,Mavs,Bucks,Warriors)
                                           ^^^^^^^^

Are the Warriors on their way up or down ?
110.766ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu May 18 1995 17:5522
    
>                       -< I'm never quite sure, but... >-
    
>>    Now ML has to find a way to equalize the number of teams passing the
>>    C's on the way up (Bullets,Mavs,Bucks,Warriors)
                                           ^^^^^^^^

>Are the Warriors on their way up or down ?
    
    Easy way to tell...
    
    Call the number of wins in the past year W1
    
    Call the number of wins the year before that W2
    
    If W1>W2, they're about to enter the down side of the roller coaster.
    
    If W2>W1, they're about to be the surprise team of the NBA.
    
    It's just like the Celtics cycles, but about 10-15 times faster... B^)
    
    Joe
110.767AKOCOA::BREENThu May 18 1995 18:369
    Well I was thinking of the Warrior draft choices from the Webber deal
    plus some talented players like Mullin,Sprewell and Hardaway (one of
    the latter two to go for player(s)).
    
    Cleveland??  I was grasping since I could have included twolves in
    teams geared to pass the C's.  Price can't do it forever.  Atlanta's
    clinching playoffs weeks before C's is about right teamswise so I'm
    pushing there too.  Only the Clippers seem a safe bet and they beat C's
    twice head to head; they knew where to steal a win last year.
110.768HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu May 18 1995 18:547
RE                    <<< Note 110.765 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>

>Are the Warriors on their way up or down ?

  "A Warrior waits, but he knows what it is he is waiting for."
                                        - Don Juan

110.769OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaThu May 18 1995 21:371
110.770Too much success too quicklyTNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics coach? I'm available!Fri May 19 1995 19:443
    They outta send Sprewell to the Nets - he'd fit right in!
    
    NAZZ
110.771So who are the C's betterAKOCOA::BREENFri May 19 1995 20:3517
    Well I didn't say I have the definitive answer to the question 
    
    	What teams can the Celtics expect to finish ahead of next year
    
    Of the seven lottery teams Sacremento and Dallas are passed them anyway
    
    Miami has more talent and so do the Nets, we can only hope they remain
    hopeless as organizations
    
    The bucks will show the C's their tail for years to come, the bullets
    if they sign Webber will be 10 games better
    
    Only twolves and clippers are serious bottomfeeder competition unless
    someone comes down.  Oh we had warriors - wait and see on that
    
    I would say the chance right now are better that the C's finish 1,2,3
    at the bottom than making the playoffs
110.772HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri May 19 1995 20:438
  Of course it doesn't help when your two best players die.

  Granted those two guys wouldn't have meant the difference between this team
being a champion and what they are now but it might have made a difference in
the late Larry, Kevin, and Robert years and it may have given them something to
build around in the 90's. 

  George 
110.773Top 3 lottery pick next year.CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Mon May 22 1995 12:456
    I don't know George. Bias probably would have been in the same
    situation as Dumas. There is not one GM in the league now who would
    trade their 12 man roster for the C's. Oh well. At least we can
    remember their last championship although it sure is getting hazy.
    
    Mike
110.774Old news or new news??ILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersMon May 22 1995 15:2018
>>    Sprewell has requested to be traded from the Warriors.

	Mike,

	Are you going by OLD news, or is this (very) recent??

	The last reports I read out of the Bay Area had Sprewell
	and Hardaway patching up their differences and actually
	getting along. Both the Warriors and Sprewell's agent
	emphasized that he was NOT requesting a trade ...

	And now that they have the number one pick in the draft,
	this team could move from the cellar to the penthouse
	awfully fast if they can stay healthy ...

	Vinny
	

110.775AKOCOA::BREENMon May 22 1995 15:386
    Okay what does GS do with that #1 pick?  Stackhouse?  Or one of the
    powerforward/center types.  Or do they package it and trade down for a
    Thorp type.
    
    Speaking of Thorp, Nazz is having the last laugh on the Drexler trade,
    after all who cares about what the trade did during the regular season.
110.776CNTROL::CHILDSJJS the BucketsMasterMon May 22 1995 15:506
    
    trade it to the Bullets for Webber and their no. 1 pick....
    
    if they keep it and pass on Joe Smith they need their heads examined...
    
     mike
110.777OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaMon May 22 1995 15:511
110.778Joe SmithMARIN::DODGEMon May 22 1995 17:1417
    The Sprewell situation is NOT resolved.  Lots of people are talking for
    Sprewell, but he hasn't spoken a word.  In fact no one has seen him.
    Neither Hardaway nor Dave Twardzik have seen or talked to Sprewell.
    
    Hardaway and Twardzik said they can work with Spree and look forward to
    talking to him.  Spree's agent says he will play next year. Yeah but
    where ?  Spree has a real attitude and is very moody.  The fans were
    very tough on him last season.  Depending on his mood any particular
    day his preferences change.
    
    The Warriors draft day decision all hinges on Sprewell.  If he stays
    they go with Joe Smith, if he goes they would choose Jerry Stackhouse.
    My advice is to pick the best available big man, maybe Joe Smith.
    Then if Spree decides he wants to be traded you can trade him for
    another shooting guard.  Trading for a big man is much more difficult.
    
    R&G_Don
110.779I'd trade the pickAKOCOA::BREENIndians rule,sox sip; Phillip is sixMon May 22 1995 17:359
    Well we really didn't see a lot of Stackhouse and he may really be that
    good.  Smith is a bit of a tweener, even with him you'd be looking for
    that mountain in the middle.  I honestly think Duncan may have gone
    before Smith.
    
    A Webber,Kidd,Hill,Robinson were all sure things and I think Stackhouse
    is a future star.  It's tough to be so sure of Smith.  I think I'd let
    some team that is "sure" make me a generous offer and get in the 7-17
    area knowing I'm going to get a solid future pro and something back.
110.780USCTR1::GARBARINOTue May 23 1995 17:341
After seeing Joe Smith, I can't see any doubt about his talent.
110.781I guess you never really knowAKOCOA::BREENIndians rule,sox sip; Phillip is sixTue May 23 1995 18:379
    Well I will grant that outplaying the ACC competition is a pretty good
    sign.  St John's had Walter Berry who outplayed everyone but couldn't
    play in the NBA (for various reasons).  The guy I was so wrong about
    was Rumeal Robinson who I may have cheered for because of his local
    roots.
    
    Now Glenn Robinson was a sure thing and Webber certainly seemed to be
    and still may achieve greatness.  Also I saw less of Smith than Rasheed
    or Duncan.
110.782USCTR1::GARBARINOWed May 24 1995 15:1819
>    St John's had Walter Berry who outplayed everyone but couldn't
>    play in the NBA (for various reasons).

Berry had a lazy streak in him from Day-1 at SJU.  He never displayed
the intensity he needed to overcome his size (for a #4) or his lack of
an outside shot (for a #3).


>The guy I was so wrong about was Rumeal Robinson

Rumeal had an obvious (shooting) weakness while at Michigan.


What I see in Joe Smith is obvious low-post talent/skills, and a lot
of desire and energy in his play.  I can't see how this kid will be
a bust in the pros.  I see the same in Stackhouse.  Given the high
percentage of failures of past lottery picks, these two have to be
EVERYONE'S top-2 picks.  After that, it's just a matter of whether
you want a #4 or a #2.
110.783the real big man...BSS::MENDEZWed May 24 1995 17:154
    Is McDyess of Alabama turning pro?   He looks like a future star...
    He is quick he can shoot he can block shots and looks to be tireless.
    I think he is 6'11"...
    
110.784I think he's only a sophmoreMKOTS3::LONGLife is better left to chance.Wed May 24 1995 17:254
    I thought I read something where he decided to stay in school.
    
    
    billl
110.785CNTROL::CHILDSJJS the BucketsMasterWed May 24 1995 17:285
    
    Mcdyess is coming out and rumors are that the Clippers might be hot
    for his services leaving Stackhouse for the Sixers..........
    
    mike
110.786BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredMon Jun 19 1995 20:355

	ML is now the head coach of the Celtics.

	Kevin
110.787MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Jun 19 1995 20:472
    
        I have seen the enemy and he is us.
110.788You're hired!BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredMon Jun 19 1995 20:579
>        <<< Note 110.787 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
>
>    
>        I have seen the enemy and he is us.


	The interview must have gone pretty good.

	Kevin
110.789CAMONE::WAYUSS Bonefish, SS-223, In MemoriamTue Jun 20 1995 14:533
How LAME is that decision.....


110.790Please prove everyone wrong, MLINTER::NAZZAROCeltics coach? I'm available!Tue Jun 20 1995 14:5513
    This is a sad turn of events for anyone with an interest in seeing the
    Celtics back in a position to compete for the NBA title before the 21st
    century.  Bob Ryan in today's Globe used the term "the Clippers of the
    East" to refer to what the Celtics could turn into, and I feel that's
    an appropriate comparison.
    
    Those people who subscribe to the theory that you have to get worse
    before you get batter are going to have a chance to see that theory put
    to the test.  My fear is that indeed the Celtics will become the
    Clippers, or the Bullets, or the Nets, or the Kings - instead of trying
    to remain on top like the Lakers have successfully done.
    
    NAZZ
110.791Go MLAKOCOA::BREENTue Jun 20 1995 15:0313
    Well I've been wrong a lot and this may be another but I'm in favor of
    M.L. taking over the whole operation.  This is partly because of his
    replacing Gavitt and Volk and on the other hand a Ford who was
    ineffectual because he too needed more control.
    
    As I said early making the playoffs - which will be a big Carr goal,
    making and advancing - will be much tougher because the bucks,pistons
    and bullets will be much tougher and I don't know what teams above the
    Celtics will be fading.
    
    I'm much more excited with ML than any Celtic arrangement since the
    Jones days.  I think charisma and creativity are more important than
    any so-called lack of experience (accounting courses?).
110.792ha ha haROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Tue Jun 20 1995 15:167
110.793talk about overstatementsOUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Jun 20 1995 15:564
110.794MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jun 20 1995 17:0324

        Just when you thought it couldn't get worse...

      This was the stupidest decision since Stu Sutcliffe
      decided to quit the Beatles for a steady job. Not
      only does ML Carr have no experience as a coach, he's
      never done anything that would suggest that he has
      the makings of a coach. As a player he was more tough 
      than smart and in the 'tics front office he's never ex-
      hibited anything more than a winning smile. The Idiot 
      Son Of Gaston says we'll have fun seeing if ML can coach.
      Maybe the Idiot Son Of Gaston will have fun watching
      Larry Brown pull ML's underwear over ML's head but it
      won't be any laughing matter to the thousands of Celtics
      season ticket holders or the fans at home. It would almost
      make sense if ML's intention was to be the guy who toughs
      it out until they have a base of young talent for a real
      coach to come in and take over but from hearing him talk
      and knowing the massiveness of his ego, ML thinks he's
      the guy who can personally restore the Celtics to glory
      as head coach and GM. The fool on the hill.
        
    
110.795ROCK::GRONOWSKIYanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!Tue Jun 20 1995 17:086
110.796OUTSRC::HEISERMaranatha!Tue Jun 20 1995 17:131
110.797CAMONE::WAYUSS Bonefish, SS-223, In MemoriamTue Jun 20 1995 17:232
Like Imus said --  Just pin a note on Red's windbreaker and send him to the
dog track.....
110.798What's Bernie Bickerstaff got that ML ain'tAKOCOA::BREENTue Jun 20 1995 17:528
    We've tried experience (Ford, Gavitt) and they were big failures.  Now
    we'll try brass nuggets knowing we can't do worse.
    
    Motivation and energy have been the big needs the last few years, that
    and being able to perform in the clutch.
    
    The bonus of course is ML could fail big time and we'd end up with
    Camby in next years draft.
110.799CAMONE::WAYUSS Bonefish, SS-223, In MemoriamTue Jun 20 1995 17:5927
>    We've tried experience (Ford, Gavitt) and they were big failures.  Now
>    we'll try brass nuggets knowing we can't do worse.
    
I don't know Bill.

To me that's like a cancer patient saying "okay, I tried Doc A, and I tried
Doc B, but now I think I'll go to the lady next door to me who thinks she's
got a potion to cure cancer...."


We might have tried experience, but obviously it was not the RIGHT experience.
There's other proven names out there that might have been had.

I knew it was curtains when ML would be choosing the coach because I knew
he'd pick himself.  I thought he was smarter than that.   



To me, the way I see it, we've got all three Boston sports teams with bogus
coaches --   The Red Sox have "Butch" Kennedy, the Celts have ML, and the
Bruins now have Kasper the Friendly Coach (thanks /Don for that one)......

Gonna be slim pickin's nexted season....


'Saw

110.800CNTROL::CHILDSWatch out Big Brother's watching!Tue Jun 20 1995 18:049
    
    Talk about brutal.....the guy hasn't even coached yet and already he's
    hung out to dry. Give the guy a chance. Afterall it's a player's league
    more than an x's and o's league so if he can communicate and get the
    guys to want to play with fire he'll do ok imo. x's and o's can be
    learnt over time but communication is a skill you either got it or
    you don't.........
    
    mike
110.801MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jun 20 1995 18:069
    
  >> We've tried experience (Ford, Gavitt) and they were big failures.  
    
     Ford had no experience as a pro coach and wasn't really a "big
     failure". Gavitt had no experience as a pro gm/director of basket-
     ball operations and *was* a big failure. ML has no experience as either
     a coach or gm. Whether he'll be a failure at one or both remains to
     be seen but he's off to a rocky start as a gm and he has nothing 
     to work with as a coach. 
110.802"Nah"MKOTS3::KCUMMINGSTue Jun 20 1995 19:089
    
    
    communicating with the players is great.  Being a good friend to 
    Dominique Wilkins isn't gonna bring back those young legs.  Face it,
    about the only thing the Celts are going to get next year is a lottery
    pick.  The Gaston boys are just trying save some money by buing the ole
    two for one special.  ML is no dummy, collect 800k for a couple years
    and it's see ya lata bye bye!! Let's hope the luck of the Irish is
    sitting on that lottery machine!
110.803Now THAT'S Entertainment !USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jun 21 1995 14:4911
>      Maybe the Idiot Son Of Gaston will have fun watching
>      Larry Brown pull ML's underwear over ML's head but it
>      won't be any laughing matter to the thousands of Celtics
>      season ticket holders or the fans at home.

I don't know, if I were in the stands I think I'd enjoy this very much !



....some very funny replies in here today....   And even though I'm a
Knicks fan, I'm laughing with ya, not at ya !
110.804Good one JoeAKOCOA::BREENWed Jun 21 1995 15:471
    And .803 is one of the funniest yet
110.805I was serious...USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jun 21 1995 18:251
>                               -< Good one Joe >-
110.806'Not happening!!!"AKOCOA::TROYWed Jun 21 1995 19:439
    
    ML as coach = JOKE
    
    Season Ticket Holder = the LAUGHS are on YOU.
    
    UMASS fan =  Camby in Lottery '96 for Celts
    
    When Mr. Non-Sports Don Imus makes fun of this for two days you know
    that it is "NOT HAPPENING".
110.807Celtics' stockOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Jul 12 1995 16:326
110.808nope, I thinkHBAHBA::HAASimprobable causeWed Jul 12 1995 17:135
Dat's the onliest one that I know about.

You can trade in some of the parent companies, like CBS.

TTom
110.809ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Jul 17 1995 19:3924
  Unusual thing happened this weekend.

  Patty and I were at Legal Seafoods in Framingham about 50 minutes into a 20
minute wait for a table and everyone in the waiting area pointed and said
"look". I turned around and there, about two feet in front of my nose, was the
biggest elbow I had ever seen. Going up from the elbow was this giant arm.
Above that shoulders on top if which, up near the ceiling, sat the head of
Robert Parish. 

  Geezes is he big. Not just tall, his arm alone looked like a tree. And his
hands, if he ever reached in for a hand full of your popcorn, you'd go hungry. 

  Anyway, the manager came out, shook his hand and lead him and his lady off to
a table. At 1st I thought she looked small next to the Chief but then I
realized she was probably taller than I am. 

  It was cool, we ended up sitting at the next table. Not many people bothered
him, only one or two went up and asked for autographs in a restaurant that
probably had a hundred people. I didn't see what he was eating but what ever
it was he ate all of it.

  Seemed like a nice guy, friendly to everyone who talked to him.

  George
110.810IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Mon Jul 17 1995 19:434
>I didn't see what he was eating but what ever
>it was he ate all of it.

Good!  Did you let him have dessert?  :-) :-) :-)
110.811MTWAIN::BURROWSVolkl: Smoke'm if you got'm.Mon Jul 17 1995 20:053
   How long did he ave to wait?  Did he get seated before you did?

   CBB
110.812ERICF::MAIEWSKIMon Jul 17 1995 20:149
  He waited about a minute. The manager came out, shook his hand, and showed
him to a seat.

  We had been waiting about 50 minutes at that point and we were the next to
be seated.

  Geezes is he big.

  George
110.813CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Aug 14 1995 16:035
    
     So I guess no one here is really crying about 'Nique's departure. 
     What would have happened with his salary slot in the old days???
    
     mike
110.814good riddanceHBAHBA::HAASx,y,z,time,matter,energyMon Aug 14 1995 16:1910
Same as the new days, if'n ratified.

This season the Celtics get half of it back and nexted season they get
the other half. Same as if'n he retired. Either way, the team has to be
better without 'im.

This should pretty much settle the issue once and fer all that Nique is
no Hall of Famer, no way.

TTom
110.815Will make the season a lot more interestingTNPUBS::NAZZAROHow can people live in Florida?Mon Aug 14 1995 17:5514
    Well, the rebuilding process can now begin in earnest.  So long Nique -
    don't let the door hit your butt on the way out.  I'm glad for him
    (he's a nice guy, unlike a few people I've met on this team).  He gets
    to play half the number of games as he would have in the NBA, against
    much less severe competition, for a better salary.  Seems like a
    no-brainer for him.
    
    As for the Celtics, rookie Eric Williams, Rick Fox, and Greg Minor all
    will benefit from Nique's departure.  This will make the Celtics
    quicker, faster, younger (obviously), and much better defensively.
    There's a chance this could be a fun team to watch, pending a couple
    of other moves.
    
    NAZZ
110.816I've seen better stiffs in the morgue!ROCK::GRONOWSKITribe owns Yanks... bye in playoffs if they meetMon Aug 14 1995 23:575
110.817IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 15 1995 12:284
You can't get Celtic fans depressed, Groaner.  'Nique is gone!!!!!

It's like having a huge weight lifted...
110.818ROCK::GRONOWSKITribe owns Yanks... bye in playoffs if they meetTue Aug 15 1995 14:514
110.819IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Tue Aug 15 1995 14:588
>    With a guy like ML Carr at the helm, it will only be a matter of time
>    before they sign a guy like Roy Tarpley to a 7 year, $42 Million
>    contract.

True, but until then I'm happy.

M.L. Carr frightens me, though.  It really makes me wonder how people get GM
jobs...
110.820Barros a CelticBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredFri Sep 22 1995 13:526

	Celtics sign Dana Barros to a six year deal worth $32M.  Is this a good
	move for them?

	Kevin
110.821RE: BarrosIMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Sep 22 1995 14:012
Please tell me this is a joke...  :-(
110.822MSBCS::BRYDIEFaster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!Fri Sep 22 1995 14:2816
    
      Unfortunatley, it ain't no joke. It's another episode 
     of ''Oh, that ML!'. First he signs over-the-hill ball hog 
     Dominique Wilikns who despite his advancing age still wants
     his 25 shots a night and still thinks defense goes around da
     yard. ML gets lucky when it turns out that there is actually 
     someone in Greece stupider than he is. Does he learn his
     lesson? Hell no. He goes out and throws a big pile of money
     at local pipsqueak Dana Barros who can hit the trey but is 
     no more worth 5 mil a year than Dino is. Anyone who misses
     the Sullivans should become a 'Tics fan and hey'll be treated 
     to the same sort of managerial ineptitude. And anyone, who cries
     about player greed when folks like ML are willing to throw this
     kind of money at this kind of player, needs to give their head
     a shake. It ain't player greed, it's management stupidity.
     
110.823I'll drink to thatMUNDIS::SSHERMANThere ain't no sanity clauseFri Sep 22 1995 15:006
>             It ain't player greed, it's management stupidity.
     
Without knowing anything about the player or the merits, all I can say
to the above is "Hear, hear".

Steve
110.824Still stuck in the mud, regardless of what they do...PCBUOA::MORGANFri Sep 22 1995 15:227
    Actually, we still don't know the real numbers in regard to dollars and
    length of contract, just yet anyway.  The other half of this signing is
    the expected departure of Sherman Douglas, so I guess we'll have to see
    how it all plays out.  No matter what they do, they're still going to
    suck anyway!
    
    					Steve 
110.825OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Sep 22 1995 15:304
110.826ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allFri Sep 22 1995 16:236
110.827SALEM::TIMMONSFri Sep 22 1995 16:485
    Anyone know if Barros' mother still works for DEC?
    
    She did, back when he first came into the league.
    
    Lee
110.828Harry Sinden > ML - at least Harry doesn't *blow* the money...IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Fri Sep 22 1995 17:328
$30+ million for a guy who gives you 3-point shooting, but nothing else
you don't have already... <sigh>

If a guy's height doesn't begin with "7" and he's not Michael Jordan,
why do you spend it?

Groaner is dead on - this is great if you don't like the Celtics.
110.829CSLALL::BRULEyou killed freakin Larry!Fri Sep 22 1995 17:522
    It's been reported on NECN that it's a 6 year 22 million $ contract.
    Mike
110.830OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Sep 22 1995 17:531
110.831bad move... but I like it :-)ROCK::GRONOWSKIRed Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it allSat Sep 23 1995 02:273
110.832CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearMon Sep 25 1995 11:5812
Article in yesterday's sport section said that once Dominique was gone, ML
should have put the money in the bank, because next year, a lot of good players
will be free agents (Shaq etc)

But NOOO, the article said, ML goes out and gets Barros.  Nice three point
shooter, but it'll be like shoring up the Celtics defense with a sieve.

One can only hope that ML reaches his level of incompetence quickly and 
gets canned...


'Saw
110.833spend if ML; Michael's watchingAKOCOA::BREENMon Sep 25 1995 12:202
    Isn't there a provision in the collective bargaining that they have to
    spend the money ($23 mil).  Or if not a rule a clear understanding?
110.834Where is the down side to signing Barros???TNPUBS::NAZZAROI'll make a good Gordon, GordonMon Sep 25 1995 12:4621
    I simply cannot understand the bitchin' and moanin' about this signing.
    
    There are no more salary cap "slots" - there's just the cap.  The
    Celtics were under the cap for the first time in the past decade, so
    they go out and sign the BEST free agent available, by far.  And
    the so-called "experts" are up in arms.
    
    Name one other free agent that comes close to the vallue of Barros.
    He improves the team in three-point shooting, foul shooting, and most
    importantly gives you a point guard you want to handle the ball in the
    clutch.  I maintain that if Barros played for Boston last spring
    instead of Sherm, the Celtics beat the Magic.  Because in the two close
    games, Dana doesn't make the mistakes Sherm does by trying to do too
    much and win the game on his own.
    
    Yes, the backcourt is tiny.  Yes, they still need to use next year's
    free agent crop to sign a franchise player.  But by my calculations,
    they will have about $7 million available to sign a free agent nexted
    season, providing they can dump Sherm.
    
    NAZZ
110.835MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Sep 25 1995 16:0510
    
       Barros doesn't bring the Celtics any closer to championship
      level. At all. It's a nice PR moving into the new Garden but
      little else. Thanksdad was all to prophetic when he said that
      being under the cap was either an opportunity for the Celtics 
      to improve the club or to shoot themselves in the foot. They 
      chose the latter. The Celtics will again be just bad enough
      to not be a factor but not quite bad enough to get a decent
      lottery pick. A lottery pick who might have been paired with 
      a real superstar that should have gotten Barros' dough.
110.836how many does it seat?OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Sep 25 1995 16:102
110.837MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Sep 25 1995 16:136
    
        It's the new Garden not the Fleet Center. Only an out-of-stater
       would call it the Fleet Center. It seats 18,000 for basketball. 
       In a recent article the designers said that they made it rather 
       spartan because Bostonians like their sports without a whole lot 
       of extra cheerleading. This ain't Phoenix, in other words.
110.838IMBETR::DUPREZThe stars might lie, but the numbers never do...Mon Sep 25 1995 16:254
>        It's the new Garden not the Fleet Center. Only an out-of-stater
>        would call it the Fleet Center. 

Wow.  That 100 feet I live from the border must make all the difference... :-)
110.839oh-fer-IIHBAHBA::HAASNetwork Consonant IIIMon Sep 25 1995 16:3114
re: .835

I kinda like ol' Dana. I think that anytime you get a Dana Barros and
lose a Sherman Douglas, you're ahead o' the curve. Add losing 'Nique and
X and you have the makings of being able to do something.

Also:

>         <<< Note 110.835 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>

Please consult note 21.2547. You'll notice that this p-name has done been
used afore...

TTom
110.840OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Sep 25 1995 18:457
110.841Dana Barros playing for the C's?HOTLNE::RLAMONTMon Sep 25 1995 19:294
    Is there any word on whether Dana Barros is going to play for the C's?
    It's a rumor I got from my brother last week.
    
    Thanks!
110.842"Curiouser and Curiouser"AKOCOA::TROYWed Sep 27 1995 16:087
    Well - the old towel waver NOW gets his shot at coaching too!  And I
    have been so impressed with his GM capabilities.  With "Chocolate
    THunder" Dawkins as the practice center - how strange will it get this year?
    And how long will it be before we stop the entombing of the Celts as
    the Bullets of the late '90's?
    
    Go Bruins!
110.843AKOCOA::BREENWed Sep 27 1995 17:047
    Well the Barros signing is the ultimate answer to Carr's dilemma of How
    to fill up the Fleet center while getting a prime spot in the lottery.
    He's hoping the Barros will fill it up and entertain like he did at BC
    where we had to wait for him to graduate to ever hope for a decent
    team.
    
    His best spot was coming off the bench for a team like Seattle.
110.844couldaHBAHBA::HAASarpecay iemdayWed Sep 27 1995 17:2213
>    His best spot was coming off the bench for a team like Seattle.

Or Charlotte.

The Hornets had Barros for about 2 minutes while making the big deal to
get rid of Kendall Gill where they laundered Barros to Philly as part of
the deal for Hersey Hawkins.

Then after lasted season, the Hornets reversed field and traded Hersey
for Gill which made a net result of giving away Barros and a firsted
round pick to end up back with Gill who they don't even want, anyway.

TTom
110.845I need some hepBSS::MENDEZThu Sep 28 1995 19:294
    I thought the Fleet Center is actually called something else like
    the New Gahden?  ESPN calls it the Fleet Center... This out of Stater
    is confused on the real name of the New Gahden/Fleet Center
    
110.847Home of your B's & C'sFABSIX::E_MAXWELLN.E. Patriots...Bound for glory.Fri Sep 29 1995 08:293
     I could swear I've heard people call it The Fleece Center. 8-)
    
                                                 Lil Ed
110.848CAMONE::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Sep 29 1995 11:4412
Well, that's better than calling it a Fleet Enema I suppose...


The *official* name is the Fleet Center.  It was going to be called the
Shawmut Center (Shawmut being Boston's original name back in the 1600s) but
Fleet (the Bank, not the Enemas) bought out Shawmut.

However, all New Englanders call it the New Gahden, for obvious, and oblivious,
reasons....


'Saw
110.849SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 02 1995 12:0938
  The Boston Garden (or "Gah'-den" as it's called in Boston) is now officially
closed and the Fleet Center is now open. Closing ceremonies for the Garden were
Friday night and Opening ceremonies for the Fleet Center were Saturday night. 

  I went to the event on Saturday. It was quite a spectacular show patterned
after the opening and closing ceremonies of recent Olympics with music, laser
shows, fireworks etc. 

  For the most part it was a Boston Pops / James Taylor concert with Patty
Labelle and several huge choral groups. Nancy Kerrigan and Paul Wiley skated,
Borque and Riley of the Bruins and Brown and another Celtic I didn't recognize
appeared in uniform and some Pulitzer prize winning author gave a lot of long
boring speeches dripping with sentimentality. There were also circus acts and a
really strange production number with singers dressed up as Fleet center
workers. 

  Just before the finale a Scottish band with bag pipes and drums came out
followed by two groups who unrolled the Celtics and Bruins banners which were
then hauled up to the rafters. As they went up the championship and retired
number banners of the Celtics and Bruins were unfurled. 

  For the finale, Sedi Ozowa (sp?), the director of the BSO, came out and
directed the pops for the 1812 overture which included laser effects and fire
works. 

  Except for the long speeches which served as chances to visit the new
concession stands it was quite a show. James Taylor did about a dozen numbers,
most with the Pops, and that alone made the price of the ticket worth while.

  The Fleet center itself seems like a really good place to see a sporting
event or watch a show with no obstructed seats, a good view of the ice/court
and stage. But take your glasses if you are up in the balcony, I was near the
balcony front row and I needed my binoculars to see the people well enough
to recognize them.

  All and all it made for a good evening. 

  George 
110.850OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Oct 02 1995 14:461
110.851MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Oct 02 1995 15:085
    
   >> Glad to see them stick with the "spartan" theme.
    
      The opening of the new Garden hardly qualifies as a "sporting event".
      
110.852SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 02 1995 15:248
  The Fleet center was built for sports, arts, entertainment, ceremonies,
political events, religious events, and anything else that could draw crowds of
that size. 

  This was a concert and ice show along with a ceremony to open the stadium for
the Celtics and Bruins. 

  George 
110.853Tractor pull or Pops on Ice ?AKOCOA::BREENMon Oct 09 1995 19:447
    When I saw the account of the event I thought "Who would go to that..?"
    
    But I'm glad you had a good time.  Did Nancy really take a fall?
    
    Of course I should talk, I watched tractor pulling at the Fryeburg fair
    whilst recovering from this ride Phil insisted on - you know the one
    where you're upside down for 10 eternal seconds.
110.854SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIMon Oct 09 1995 20:2632
  Have you ever been to a James Taylor concert? He's an outstanding performer.
I've been a fan for decades, wore out several copies of his tapes over the
years. 

  And the Pops are one of the most popular acts in town. They draw a quarter
million or more to the esplanade for their summer concert. Not exactly tractor
pull material. 

  But your not the only one to express that feeling. I heard it at the box
office and even from people in the audience at the beginning of the show. Of
course no one was saying anything like that on the way out as we groped our
way through the smoke from the industrial strength fire works that went with
the 1812 overture. Most people seemed pretty impressed. Almost no one left
early.

  Have you had a bad experience at a James Taylor concert or heard of one that
got bad reviews? I've never heard of him giving a bad performance. 

  As for the skating, Kerrigan really phoned in her performance. She's has
obviously avoided any form of training in recent months. Wiley was pretty good
but his act was pretty simple. Of course it's off season for figure skating so
it's no surprise they are not in shape, but that was a pretty short part of the
show. They were only out there about 5 minutes.

  The bagpipes and drums that went with the banner raising ceremony made that
worth while. The circus stuff and other odds and ends were OK but none of that
lasted very long. By contrast, James Taylor and Patty Labelle were out there
for over an hour.

  Good show.

  George 
110.855Right those fairs will break you fastAKOCOA::BREENMon Oct 09 1995 20:5913
    I like James, Livingston and the sister and when they get together like
    that too - And I like the Pops.  I don't care for figure skating but
    Nancy Kerrigan personally I like a lot.
    
    It's just the combining of all these things and putting them in the
    garden as a special, made for ..(who??) that was my question.
    
    A tractor pull is interesting, like stopping to watch the fire trucks
    go by, especially if the hook and ladder is in the chase.  Two pulls?
    Well time to go pet a goat?   But they were out there pulling all
    night?  All week in fact.  And no letup in the crowd roaring.
    
    Deerfield fair this weekend I think - 40000 or so of NH's finest sons 
110.856SLEEPR::MAIEWSKITue Oct 10 1995 11:1422
RE                      <<< Note 110.855 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    It's just the combining of all these things and putting them in the
>    garden as a special, made for ..(who??) that was my question.
    
  Made for a sell out crowd. Or just about, the place was packed.

  Judging from the people around me the crowd was as mixed as the show. There
were a lot of baby boomer age people who seemed to be there to see James
Taylor, the Pops, and Nancy Kerrigan, about 50-50 men and women. Then there
were a lot of X-generation hockey fan types who complained at 1st that there
was no game (again they were hockey fans) but changed over to liking the show
once JT came out. They seemed to be more 70-30 guys. 

  I'm sure there were lots of people from out of town. It was a nice day and
the Fanuel hall area was packed with tourists so I'm sure a number of them
bought tickets at the last minute. And of course the Boston elite showed up in
their Tux and evening wear and sat in the expensive seats. 

  At least that's the way it looked from the balcony. 

  George 
110.857CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Oct 11 1995 12:2826
I don't particularly care for James Taylor, but I do love the Pops!  Man, they
are cool....way cool.


Hook and Ladders -- one of the toughest jobs around, IMO, is tiller-man on the
ladder truck.  You steer that baby backwards, and you'd best time it right too.
I'm surprised that those guys don't have accidents in their regular cars
because they steer backwards all day.

And of course ladder men are a special breed, working above the fire, doing
search and rescue, checking for extension.....  Not for me.  I'm eternally and
engine man.  Give me the hose, let me look that thing in the face while I put
it out. If I'm right in front of it, I know where it is at all times....


Tractor pulls.  Hmmm....  All the animal rights groups will get all over me but
I like the oxen and horse pulls better than the tractor pulls.  


Billte, those rides are what they make the Marine Aviators go through before
flight training.  (Watched the start of "Full Metal Jacket" the other evening
again.  Man do I love that movie....  How can anyone look that prim and proper
at 0415?)


'Saw
110.858Celtics pocket schedulesTNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasWed Oct 25 1995 14:075
    I have some 1995-96 Celtics pocket schedules available.  If you want
    one (or two), send me mail at TNPUBS::NAZZARO.  Let me know your name,
    mailstop, and how many you want.
    
    NAZZ
110.859WANTED CELTS/BULLS tickets for DecemberMSE1::KPARKERWed Nov 15 1995 15:456
    WANTED   CELTS/BULLS tickets for DECEMBER
    
    Need 2 tickets to the CELTS/BULLS Game in December.  Willing to pay
    premium price.  Please contact MSE1::KPARKER if you can help.
    
    thanks...Keith
110.860CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineMon Nov 27 1995 13:4010
    
    Any idea when Nazz will comeback from the party?????
    
    For those that missed it, the Celtics traded Nazz's favorite player
    Sherman Douglas last night to the Bucks for Todd Day and Alton Lister.
    
    Depending upon which Day shows up it good be very good for the Celtics
    or just ok. Lister they should just wavier, he's useless......
    
    mike
110.861A trade that actually makes a little sense...IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Mon Nov 27 1995 14:3610
Celts were way too short at guard, Day helps there.

Obviously, Lister is no savior, but he *is* big - if he provides some decent
minutes, that's a plus.

They also got rid of Sherman's contract, which is possibly the
biggest contract they had.

Play for the lottery!!!!
110.862Don't let the door hit ya on the way out, ShermTNPUBS::NAZZAROSo long Sherm!Tue Nov 28 1995 13:4019
    Hallelujah!!!!!!
    
    YEE-HAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    A great deal, even if we got nothing in return.  But with Lister, at
    least the Celtics get a backup center who can rebound, defend, and
    block shots.  If he were at the FleetCenter (tm) Sunday, the Celtics
    win the game vs Charlotte.  The Celts no longer will have to use Junior
    Burrough at center!!!
    
    Day has the potential to really contribute.  He and Dunleavy weren't
    seeing eye to eye, and the move to Boston should really help him.
    
    As for Sherm, he was just awful this season.  His turnover/assist ratio
    was atrocious (39 assists, 29 turnovers), and his foul shooting cost
    the Celts two games.  He had to go, and ML actually managed to get a
    potential starter and a servicable sub for him.  Nice work ML!
    
    NAZZ
110.863Paul Westphall, a Celtic????STOWOA::CIPOLLAWed Jan 17 1996 11:039
    Yesterday the Phoenix suns fired Paul Westphall (<--is that the correct
    spelling) after falling to below 500 in the standings.  Already roomers
    are floating around that he may be the next coach of the Boston
    Celtics.  Personally I think this would be fabulous.  Nothing against
    M.L. but I think he is better as Manager than as coach.  As far as
    Westphall goes I think he is a great coach who was fired for the wrong
    reasons.  I think his skills are needed in Boston.  What do you all
    think?
    
110.864CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Jan 17 1996 12:187
    
    Westphal no thank you imo. They went out and hired a bunch of
    mercenaries and he couldn't get it done. He fights with KJ, he
    bows down to Chuckie, he doesn't know how to handle his players
    imo......
    
    mike
110.865STOWOA::CIPOLLAWed Jan 17 1996 12:368
    <----
    I disagree, all of his big guns are injured.  He wouldn't have made it
    as far as he did his first year if he were a terrible coach.  Besides
    even on a bad day he is better than M.L..
    
    What does 'imo' mean?
    
    
110.866what's his problem?HBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedWed Jan 17 1996 12:4214
The way I see it, all them injuries were more a_excuse to keep him than
to fire him.

Surely there musta been some other things that Colangelo din't like with
Westphal.

Locally, there's some people talking up dumping Bristow and picking up
Westphal but that kinda of talk is bound to happen when your team is
stinking up the place and the coach is the principal stinker. Such is the
case in Charlotte.

However I haven't seen any roomers floating around, though, neither, yet.

TTom
110.867CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Jan 17 1996 13:323
    imo = In My Opinion
    
    mike
110.868CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Jan 17 1996 13:369
    
    I'd give ML the benefit of the doubt for the time being. He doesn't
    have a heck of a lot of players to work with. Montross is a bust and
    Pervis isn't getting it done. Tough to win with a hole in the middle.
    
    In the NBA, I think the biggest thing a coach can do is get along with
    his players and keep them happy and motivated. I don't think Westphal
    has shown he can do this. ML atleast seems to be able to get along
    with his players and keep them happy. 
110.869no thanksOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Jan 17 1996 13:5018
110.870WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jan 17 1996 14:4713
    
    
       I think he would be a good coach for the Celts. I mean look at his
    draft picks the past few years.
    Finley
    Person
    Perry
    
      These guys are all impact players.
    
      Meanwhile our Celts are drafting Dee Brown and Montross!!!!
    
    Ughhhhhhhhhhhhh
110.871OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Jan 17 1996 15:084
110.872Can't win'em allWILLEE::MAILLOUXWed Jan 17 1996 15:163
    
    	-1, yea but we got Acie Earl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 8^)))))
    
110.873WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jan 17 1996 16:086
    
    
       Woops thanks Mike.
    
    
       But he's a gamer!!
110.874MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Jan 25 1996 15:0414
    
       I finally made it to the new Boston Garden last night and
      I can't see myself going back soon. From the $29 nosebleed
      seats to the $4.50 beers to the $20+ caps the pricing struct-
      ure seems like it was designed to discourage families from
      attending. The building itself is a nice utilitarian building 
      but pretty unremarkable. The 'Tics themselves are another story. 
      To say they stink would be generous. This team doesn't have
      a redeeming quality. Their best player, Dino Radja, would
      be a sixth man on a decent team. They have Rick Fox trying
      to play the role of the creator. A role he is really ill-suited 
      for. They have a trio of one-dimensional small guards. And
      Eric Montross looks lost half the time. They don't even have 
      a single building block for the future.
110.875CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downThu Jan 25 1996 15:1714
>      I can't see myself going back soon. From the $29 nosebleed
>      seats to the $4.50 beers to the $20+ caps the pricing struct-
>      ure seems like it was designed to discourage families from

OUCH!!!

That's damned expensive....

Boston crowds (Bruins anyway, not 100% sure on the 'tics) have always had a
heavy blue-collar element.  Sounds like that element is being priced right out
of any ability to attend games...

Family of four, you're talking dropping close to 2 big ones, with parking and a
meal....
110.876MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allThu Jan 25 1996 15:287
	And according to my sources those same tix are $55
	for the Bruins.



	billl

110.877CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downThu Jan 25 1996 15:474
>	And according to my sources those same tix are $55
>	for the Bruins.

55 Simolians for cheap seats.  What IS this world coming to?
110.878big differenceOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jan 25 1996 16:102
110.879CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downThu Jan 25 1996 16:1711
>    Phoenix Jets' (or whatever they'll call them) cheapseats are slated to 
>    be around ~$14.

I *think* that Hartford's are $21, but they do run a series of family nights
over the course of the season.  For something like $72 you get a $132 value for
four people -- tix, hot dogs, sodas, popcorn, ice cream.  It's really quite a 
value.  Course, you are only watching the Flounders...8^)

I'm sure I posted a note with the actual prices at the time.

'Saw
110.880MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Jan 25 1996 16:265
    
    /don, who is a Broons fan, tells me the cheap seats are $40 for
     Bruins games. So some slob who wants to take his wife and two
     kids to a game is looking at a $200 outlay. 
    
110.881A lot to us, a little to them.IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Jan 25 1996 16:3414
The crux of the matter is this:  $200 is big bucks to most folks, but given
the big money dealings in sports today, is chump change to franchises.

The economics of this have been discussed over and over, here and in a lot of
other places.  It's the luxury box and TV revenue that drive things nowadays.
The Browns moving to another city is just another chilling reminder.

I (and most others in here) make a pretty good living, and Celtics or Bruins
tickets, at least in my case, have basically been relegated to "I'll go if I get
'em for my birthday".  And that's not even a blip on the owners' radar screens,
as long as the Digitals, AT&Ts, and 3Coms of this world continue to buy boxes.

It's a shame - I'd really like to see the FleeceCenter.  But the Celtics
haven't done anything to make me want to go there.
110.882This keeps up, ticket prices will drop with many availableEDWIN::WAUGAMANThe Immaculate DeflectionThu Jan 25 1996 16:4422
>>      I can't see myself going back soon. From the $29 nosebleed
>>      seats to the $4.50 beers to the $20+ caps the pricing struct-
>>      ure seems like it was designed to discourage families from
>
> OUCH!!!
    
    I was there last night too.  The beers I bought were only $4.25,
    I think.  ;-)  I sat in an $18 nosebleed seat of which there are
    and will continue to be ample availability for families and non-
    families alike.  In a word, the experience sucked.  Only the 
    beers could dull the pain.  The NBA is bad enough in its own 
    right, but when the home team just basically doesn't even show up, 
    it's doubly bad.  This is a horrible, horrible product right now.
    
    I was able to see Nazz still doing his thing, though, after moving
    down to the courtside seats for the 4th quarter.  The way the game
    was being played during garbage time, it looked as if those 
    official scoring duties were not terribly taxing... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
110.883CAM::WAYWhen can their glory fade?Thu Jan 25 1996 17:1316
I know you guys will probably laugh, but I remember not all that long ago, when
my brother and I would go to a Whalers game, and we'd check to see how many
$3 seats they had left.  

We even got burned one time because we figured we'd be big spenders and buy
the $6 seats, and found out that we were just one measely row in front of the
$3....

Then they went up to $6 and $9, but even that wasn't so bad.


$200 is a major outlay.  That's like a once a season treat, you know....


And for $4.25 I'll sneak a nip or two in, and do my beer drinking at
Sullivan's Tap afterwards....8^)
110.884OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jan 25 1996 17:249
110.885USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jan 25 1996 17:371
There are $18 seats at the FleetCenter ?  Can kids see anything ?
110.886MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Jan 25 1996 17:3817
    >> I sat in an $18 nosebleed seat of which there are and will 
    >> continue to be ample availability for families and non-families 
    >> alike.  
    
       I was in section 307 row 3 seat 3. My 7 year old nephew and I 
       were the only ones in our entire row. There were empty seats all 
       through the Garden and once the game began we were provided with 
       ample reason why. I can't imagine that they can maintain this price
       structure and contnue to put butts in the seats. Not with a team as
       pathetically inept as the 'Tics. The two biggest ovations of the
       night went to the halftime entertainment and to Celtics reject Fred
       Roberts, who by the way, amused himself at the start of each half by
       knocking basketballs off the ball racks so the ballboys would have
       run after them. Last night's seats were a gift, next time I might
       ask for an exchange.
    
    
110.887MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Jan 25 1996 17:4312
    
  >> There are $18 seats at the FleetCenter ?  Can kids see anything ?
    
     When we were heading to our seats, some kid whose seats were even
     higher says to his dad, "Dad, these are really far up!" "We'll be 
     closer to God", his dad says. Talk about trying to polish a turd.
     To answer your question, you'll not be able to make out the names
     on the jerseys. If they're real familiar with the players they
     should be able to tell the players apart but spectaculr plays don't
     have the same effect. It's kind of like watching fireworks from
     a distance. Yeah, it's still pretty but not the same with out the
     boom. 
110.888IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Jan 25 1996 17:5110
>    For shame!  We only expect stuff like this from Schizophronowski(tm),
>    not you. 

I was unaware that I was burdened with such high expectations.

Tommy seems to share the same opinion. (.886 and .887)

I root for the Celtics, but I'm not really much of a pro basketball fan.  So
the onus is on them to make me want to come out.  If I went to see them all the
time, I'd never be able to afford fitted Arizona Diamondbacks hats... :-)
110.889Isn't this what the C's fans wanted?CSLALL::BRULEcountry in need of a leaderThu Jan 25 1996 18:114
    Hopefully ML is trying for a HIGH lottery pick. If they keep it up they
    won't have any problem.
    
    Mike
110.890Like, isn't this monstrosity over yet?!?!?TNPUBS::NAZZAROBe well, MarcusMon Jan 29 1996 15:264
    Actually Glenn, it's a lot harder for me to do my job in garbage time,
    since I have to still pay attention, and the mind begins to wander....
    
    NAZZ
110.891THE CELTICS IN 1995-96STRATA::HAINGUYENFri Feb 23 1996 00:363
    THE CELTICS ARE REALLY SUCK WITH  M. L. CARR
    SHOULD GET NEW COACH AND NEW PLAYERS
    
110.892CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Feb 23 1996 11:2210
  Yeh, trade deadline past and no action.

  Why don't the Celtics trade someone for a future draft choice the way they
traded Gerald Henderson for the pick that got them Len Bias? What are the
chances that lightning will strike the same place?

  Is there some problem with the cap that prevents this? At this point lower
middle of the pack is no better than dead last, why not build for the future?

  George
110.893YOO ARE TWO BLAM!GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Fri Feb 23 1996 12:474
    
    	Heh, heh....  RCASO's long lost cousin.
    
    Claybone
110.894CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Fri Feb 23 1996 12:5211
>    	Heh, heh....  RCASO's long lost cousin.
>    
>    Claybone

I was thinking the same thing, but after blasting at D.J. lately, I felt
I should take a kinder, gentler approach, lest people think I'm a 
son of a b___h.


'Saw

110.895XTATIC::CHILDSHarry Browne for President!Fri Feb 23 1996 15:3215
 Well George it's kind of tough to trade players that aren't worth a plug
 nickle. Any player that might have some talent worth trading for (radja
 and dee come to mind) from another's team's perspective is so overpaid
 that if they made the trade without the Celtics paying a piece of the guy's
 contract the locals would shoot them. Players like Fox, Minor and Wesley
 are plentiful around the league so no value on these guys despite the fact
 that they're all having decent years. Williams is only a rookie so you have
 to wait and see. Potential is there just got get the brain to snap into
 gear. Just like horses they shoot take ole Montross out in the back and 
 shoot him. take him and us out misery.......

 Funny how Tommy's been awfully quiet about ole Eric this season.......

 ;^) 
110.896OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Feb 23 1996 16:164
110.897On the road to NowhereMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Feb 23 1996 18:3219
  >> It looks to me from the Phoenix game that ML's Green Team is more
  >> talented than his starters.  Why doesn't he balance it more?  
    
     Because he doesn't know what the hell he's doing. He not a 
     coach. He's not a GM. All he *can* do is wave the hell out 
     of a towel. Winnings orgs are built from the top down which
     means 'Tics fans better get used to this kind of ineptitude
     because the top of the organization is manned by a bunch
     of guys who should be wearing fright wigs and floppy shoes
     and be squirting seltzer at each other.
     
     As for Montrosss, he's like Jethro Beadine in Monte Carlo -
     completely lost. He'lll never make anyone forget Bill Russell
     but the Celts offense is not at all suited for someone of his
     admittedly limted ability.
    
    
    
110.898CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Feb 23 1996 18:4612
  So what happened to Red Aurbach? Isn't he still running the organization?

  Word was, he was the guy who figured out how to win all of those NBA
championships, first as coach, then as coach/GM.

  Seems he should be able to either figure out how to do it again or he
should be able to find someone who can figure it out.

  Right about the time Len Bias died, he seemed to go flat, lose interest,
and the Celtics have been in decline ever since.

  George
110.899XTATIC::CHILDSHarry Browne for President!Fri Feb 23 1996 19:1714
It's all Bird's fault. Bird brought in the big spending corporations and white
folks. He made the Garden the place to be seen at and not the place to go and
watch a game. Once the seats filled up with that crowd, Red forgot about 
basketball and cater to the bottom line. The bottom line was keeping those
folks in the seats and that's why they drafted guys like Michael Young and
Eric Montross to appease the new crowd of garden dwellers. Plus I'm sure agents
have turned Red off to the point where he just doesn't care anymore.

I've met ML and he's a nice guy and I've been trying to give him the benefit of
the doubt but hence I'm afraid Tommy's right and he's nothing more than a
towel waver.........

mike
110.900CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Feb 23 1996 19:2414
  Back when he was winning the Ga'den was always full. Joke was season tickets
were passed from generation to generation. And there were agents back then as
well.

  Could be a coincidence but Red seemed to take Len Bias' death rather hard.
He had worked with Bias in some sort of summer camp and knew him fairly well.
Maybe that and age took away his drive to win but it seems if anyone knew
what it would take to turn the club around it would be Red.

  Who's the owner these days? Could there be friction between the owner and
Red? Seems the late '70s slump was caused by an owner that wouldn't listen
to him.

  George
110.901MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Fri Feb 23 1996 19:304
Red is just a figure head now.  I doubt if he's had much
input into player moves since Gavitt came aboard.

Mike
110.902MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Feb 23 1996 19:3320
  >> Back when he was winning the Ga'den was always full. Joke was 
  >> season tickets were passed from generation to generation. And 
  >> there were agents back then as well.

     Wrong. Until the Bird era you could walk up to the Garden on game
     day and buy a decent seat. This was when Russell & Co. were racking
     up titles like it was their birthright. Like MikeyC says, it wasn't
     until the Bird/Magic era that the Celts became a hot commodity
     and seats became unnattainable for the average schmoe. And like 
     Mike McCarthy says Red is just a figurehead these days. Going into
     "work" gets him out of the house. With the cap and free agency and
     the money involved tese days, what the Celts did in the 60s will never
     be repeated but Bostonians weren't astute enough to realize it back
     then.

  >> Who's the owner these days? 

     Buy a newspaper and get back to us.
    
110.903CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Feb 23 1996 19:4014
RE        <<< Note 110.902 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove" >>>

>  >> Who's the owner these days? 
>     Buy a newspaper and get back to us.
    
  Been a while since you took a leak in the dogs water dish Tommy? Hope you
feel better now. I'll take that as an "I don't know but don't have the stones
to admit it".

  Is anyone other than our self important premadonna willing to pass along who
owns the Celtics these days? I'm curious to know if Red is being forced to
be a figure head or if it's by choice.

  George
110.904Actually, hate to admit it, but I think Red is borderline senileEDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelFri Feb 23 1996 19:4310
> Is anyone other than our self important premadonna willing to pass along who
> owns the Celtics these days? I'm curious to know if Red is being forced to
> be a figure head or if it's by choice.
    
    Like the man said, buy a newspaper...
    
    
    glenn
    
110.905CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Feb 23 1996 20:004
  Poor Fido, two guys standing over the water dish.

  George
110.906AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellFri Feb 23 1996 20:139
    George, Gaston senior has been supperceded by Gaston junior, first name
    Peter I think, nicknamed "Thanksdad".  Who runs the Celtics, no one
    knows.  Is Red senile?  No more than Cousy.  M.L. says he talks to Red
    all the time.
    
    I don't think anyone could truly answer any of those questions except
    cunning was always Red's major talent.  I'm hoping he's trying to
    engineer a Camby/Calipari coup which, again IMO would be similar to the
    Bird signing of '79.
110.907RTFNMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Feb 26 1996 13:029
    
    >> Been a while since you took a leak in the dogs water dish Tommy? Hope 
    >> you feel better now. I'll take that as an "I don't know but don't have 
    >> the stones to admit it".

        The Celtics owner made headlines earlier this year for saying
        "This team stinks." You'd know that if you were paying attention.
    
    
110.908ML TO BLAM!~HBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Mon Feb 26 1996 13:040
110.909CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Feb 26 1996 13:3510
RE           <<< Note 110.906 by AKOCOA::BREEN "You never can tell" >>>

>    George, Gaston senior has been supperceded by Gaston junior, first name
>    Peter I think, nicknamed "Thanksdad".  Who runs the Celtics, no one
>    knows.  Is Red senile?  No more than Cousy.  M.L. says he talks to Red
>    all the time.
    
  Thanks for the straight answer.

  George
110.910Free hintSALEM::DODASpring training, PLEASE!Tue Feb 27 1996 12:436
George,

He's the one that isn't crying for a new building to play in....

HTH
daryll
110.911Red's last move with the club was his worst - hiring GavittTNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Tue Feb 27 1996 14:4518
    I kinda like the idea that Bird is to blam for the current state of the
    Celtics.  He was so good that the brass thought they could ride his
    coattails forever.  When he got injured in 1987-89, that pretty much
    marked the end of the "Bird Era", though you could argue it ended in
    1987 with both Parish and McHale playing hurt in the playoff loss to
    the Lakers.  The front office was unprepared to rebuild, as they
    thought the "Big Three" would go on forever.  Then they made the
    monumental blunder of hiring Dave "do nothing" Gavitt as GM, whose idea
    of a tough day at work was only getting in 18 holes of golf.  
    
    The lack of response to an aging team and the lack of a plan to rebuild 
    has cost the Celtics big-time here in the mid 90s.  ML is actually
    doing a pretty decent job, but he was handed an impossible situation
    and keeps sticking his foot in his mouth but not qualifying statements
    that the team is "championship driven".  I don't mind him saying that,
    but I wish he'd qualify it by saying not this year, or the next.
    
    NAZZ
110.912CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Apr 22 1996 16:198
  Well it appears the Celtics season has drawn to a close with something like
33 wins, several games out of making the playoffs.

  General Manager and head coach M.L. Carr announced that he will be coaching
again next year saying there is more work that needs to be done.

  Hopefully they will get a good draw in the lottery,
  George
110.913Reggie's widow sues cardiologistHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed May 01 1996 14:5611
Donna Harris-Lewis, wife of the late Reggie Lewis, is suing the
cardiologist who cleared Reggie to play after he collapsed in the playoff
game against the Hornets.

She's suing on the claim that Gilbert Mudge and three of his associates
were negligent in telling Reggie that he coule play without limitations. 

Reggie was refered to Mudge after the Celtics team physician told him
that his ailment was life-threatening.

TTom
110.914IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanWed May 01 1996 15:3410
I wonder if the court will allow playing of the TV clip of her from a
couple of months after the fact saying that she didn't feel it was
anyone's fault.

Obviously, she probably didn't know then what she knows now, but could 
something like that be potentially damaging to her case?

I don't know what to think of this one.  An expert malpractice lawyer was
quoted as saying that one thing in her favor was that there was clear
disagreement among the two groups of doctors.
110.915CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 15:4213
  The 1st big thing in her favor is that med mal insurance companies will often
settle rather than going on to a protracted fight where they might win but they
also might get socked with a multi million dollar verdict and at the very least
will have enormous court costs. 

  The 2nd thing is that the "dream team" of cardiac doctors at the 1st hospital
said his problem looked real and he should not play.

  The thing going against her is that she and Reggie went against the "Dream
Team's" advice and went to the doctor at the 2nd hospital whom they are now
suing.

  George
110.917Money is a big motivatorTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks UMass for a great season!Wed May 01 1996 16:0012
    Three year limit - she beat the statute by a couple of months.
    
    I simply don't understand what she has to gain from this.  If they go
    to trial, which won't be for several years apparently, she will be
    exposed as a money-grubbing ice queen.  Reggie's name will be dragged
    through the mud again.  Drug use allegations, never proven, will of
    course resurface.  Wasn't the salary from the Celtics and the huge life
    insurance payment ($17.7 million) enough money for her?  How greedy is
    this?  All she can gain is money.  What she will lose is respect,
    honor, class, and dignity. 
    
    NAZZ
110.918AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. Bull...Wed May 01 1996 16:018
    Mike it's three in Mass and she's filing just under the max.  I wonder
    if NU clearing Reggie of that part of the drug allegations cleared one
    hurdle.
    
    That is Shaugnessy's point today - why does she want to drag Reggie's
    name thru the mud again since drug use allegations would be conceivably
    part of the defense.  I say that assuming DS is right about her getting
    the 10 million salary paid to the Lewis estate.
110.919CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 16:1418
   <<< Note 110.917 by TNPUBS::NAZZARO "Thanks UMass for a great season!" >>>

>    I simply don't understand what she has to gain from this.  If they go
>    to trial, which won't be for several years apparently, she will be
>    exposed as a money-grubbing ice queen.  Reggie's name will be dragged
>    through the mud again.  Drug use allegations, never proven, will of
>    course resurface.  

  If she feels strongly that Reggie was never involved with drugs this will be
an opportunity for her to make that case in front of the public. 

  As for the claim of money-grubbing, yes the sports radio call in crowd will
make that claim as they always do but so what? Next sports scandal that bunch
will be "OUTRAGED" by something else and she'll be yesterday's news so why not
go off into obscurity with several more million dollars for her and her
family? 

  George
110.920exitBSS::NEUZILWed May 01 1996 16:275
    George, I've noticed from a few of your notes that you seem to have a
    dislike (disdain?) for people who call into radio talk shows.  If this
    is true, why do you listen to the shows?
    
    Kevin
110.921MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed May 01 1996 16:2814
    >> If she feels strongly that Reggie was never involved with 
    >> drugs this will be an opportunity for her to make that case 
    >> in front of the public. 

       Why would she want to do that? Most people didn't believe that
       Reggie was involved with drugs and those that did are generally
       the types that are prepared to believe the worst anyways. I'm with
       Nazz. She has naught to gain but money and much to lose. No doubt
       there is some sleazeball lawyer (they do exist!) priming her with
       a sharp eye om his/her contigency fee. This is just another example
       of the litigatory excess that has run rmapant in modern America.
       The greed of lawyers fueling the greed of would-be victims.
     
110.923CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 16:3612
RE                       <<< Note 110.920 by BSS::NEUZIL >>>

>    George, I've noticed from a few of your notes that you seem to have a
>    dislike (disdain?) for people who call into radio talk shows.  If this
>    is true, why do you listen to the shows?
    
  Some times I'm in a garage having my car fixed and they have it on. I got
stuck listening to Imas the other day because of that one. Sometimes I'm
in my car flipping through the AM stations listening for a traffic update.
I don't know, different reasons. Never by design, that's for sure.

  George
110.924AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherWed May 01 1996 16:399
    
    
      George if you only are listening for a minute here and there I hardly
    think you in any position to make broad assumptions about the people
    who call in.  I listen to EEI outta Boston and WTM from Worcester and
    in some cases there are some nuts but the % is very small.  Most call
    in to whine about how bad the B's/Sox/Pats are doing.  My guess is this
    civil suit with Ms. Lewis will get a passing call at best.  The Peter 
    thing was entirely different though.
110.925MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed May 01 1996 16:395
    
  >> Some times I'm in a garage having my car fixed and they have it on. 
    
     I think you'd best get a new car because you gripe about sportstalk 
     radio almost weekly.
110.926CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 16:4127
Re        <<< Note 110.921 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove" >>>

>She has naught to gain but money and much to lose. 

  Exactly what does she have to lose? If he didn't do drugs it can't be proved
and somehow I don't think she cares a whole lot about those sports fans who
are always bleating on adnausium about how athletes get too much money.

>No doubt
>       there is some sleazeball lawyer (they do exist!) priming her with
>       a sharp eye om his/her contigency fee. This is just another example
>       of the litigatory excess that has run rmapant in modern America.
>       The greed of lawyers fueling the greed of would-be victims.
     
  You've been listening to too much political propaganda from the party funded
by Corporate America. In Massachusetts there is a really good system set up to
stop frivolous claims. Before any med mal case can be brought to court it goes
in front of a panel that examines it in detail. If she doesn't get that
panel's OK she'll have to put up a bond to cover court costs for the other
side in the event she losses. 

  I know from experience that the panel in question is no rubber stamp. They
go over the claim with a fine tooth comb and often you get sent packing. If
this case makes it to court there will be good reason to believe that it has
merit.

  George
110.928things that make you go hmmmmmm...BSS::NEUZILWed May 01 1996 16:516
    Interesting comment there George.  Either you've tried to bring a
    frivolous lawsuit to court or you're involved with someone who's tried
    to bring a frivolous lawsuit to court.  Assuming, of course, that you
    aren't a doctor and had a frivolous case filed against you.
    
    Kevin
110.929CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 16:5112
RE          <<< Note 110.927 by PHXSS1::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>

>    What are Mrs. Lewis' alternatives when this passes the 3-year mark? 
>    Can she file some sort of civil suit?

  This is a civil suit. If she misses the deadline she's out of luck.

  If there is anything to read between the lines it is that she was probably
somewhat reluctant to file the suit and waited as long as she could before
losing her chance forever.

  George
110.930CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 17:0025
RE                       <<< Note 110.928 by BSS::NEUZIL >>>

>    Interesting comment there George.  Either you've tried to bring a
>    frivolous lawsuit to court or you're involved with someone who's tried
>    to bring a frivolous lawsuit to court.  Assuming, of course, that you
>    aren't a doctor and had a frivolous case filed against you.
    
  No that's just the point. This panel not only throws out frivolous law
suits, they throw out many that are in the gray area.

  The time we ran into it we had an infant mortality and several parties were
named. The panel allowed the suit against some but not others. The feeling
was that while the people dropped by the panel might have prevented the
death they didn't cause it.

  To this day we believe that if several of the people dropped were doing their
job that kid would still be alive but the panel tossed them out. We settled
with the ones the panel allowed.

  One of Patty's friends has also had the panel toss some cases that didn't
look at all that bad. The lawyer in question was also a registered nurse and
knew her stuff really well but contrary to popular opinion, in Massachusetts
you don't get a med mal case into court unless it is pretty solid.

  George
110.931curiouser and curiouser...BSS::NEUZILWed May 01 1996 17:035
    So now we hear you say that you think you know more than the panel who
    is authorized by law to make such determinations.  Pretty easy to see
    why you constantly defend lawyers.  No personal bias, eh?
    
    Kevin
110.932MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed May 01 1996 17:1730
  >> Exactly what does she have to lose? 

     Her name and Reggie's name will be dragged through the mud. 
     Every detail of her personal life that is at all relevant 
     will held up for public scrutiny. She doesn't want for money.
     The Celtics ensured that she was well taken care of. She is
     appearing to be greedy and self-centered whereas Reggie was
     quiet and giving.

   >> If he didn't do drugs it can't be proved and 

      I haven't heard anyone mention Reggie Lewis and drugs in the
      same sentence in well over a year. But you can be sure the two
      will be linked time and time again until this thing is resolved
      and probably for some time after that. Donna will be painted as
      greedy and it will be asserted that the Lewis searched for the
      diagnosis they wanted and it blew up in their faces and now she
      wants money for it. It won't be pretty and she will have brought
      it all on herself. 
     
   >> You've been listening to too much political propaganda from the 
   >> party funded by Corporate America.

      I don't know which party you mean as I have no party affiliation. 
      I'm a liberal with several libertarian beliefs but I firmly believe 
      that the litigiousness so prevalent today is a major financial burden
      on the economy and a major reason for skyrocketing medical costs and
      it's largely driven by fee hungry attorneys and it needs to be stopped.
    
110.933CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 17:3017
RE                       <<< Note 110.931 by BSS::NEUZIL >>>

>    So now we hear you say that you think you know more than the panel who
>    is authorized by law to make such determinations.  

  I never said any such thing, I just have an opinion that is different from
theirs. Don't you ever disagree with government officials who are authorized by
law to make the decisions they make? 

>Pretty easy to see
>    why you constantly defend lawyers.  No personal bias, eh?

  I never claimed not to have personal bias. But along with that bias comes
experience and that experience often runs against the propaganda about lawyers
fed up by the party who is bought and paid for by Corporate America.

  George
110.934goodun!~HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed May 01 1996 17:4612
Folks, we've got some real gems in this string...

"Probably somewhat reluctant" is worthy of a p-name at least. 

"Along with bias comes experience" sounds like a_endorsement for Jesse
Helms in his re-election bid.

As for "lawyers fed up by the party", I can only ask, what party? I never
got a_invite. And when I do go to parties, I try not to get fed up so I
can drink up.

TTom
110.935CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastWed May 01 1996 17:488
I think George doesn't like sports call-in shows cause he can't get instant
access to debate with each caller.

Actually, I think George has missed his calling (no pun intended).  He should
be a radio-sports-talk-show host......


8^)
110.936CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 17:5138
RE        <<< Note 110.932 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove" >>>

>     Her name and Reggie's name will be dragged through the mud. 
>     Every detail of her personal life that is at all relevant 
>     will held up for public scrutiny. 

  I seriously doubt this will ever go to trial. She does not seem all that
aggressive and the insurance company for the doctor who committed what appears
to be an obvious blunder is not likely to want to risk a multi-million dollar
verdict. Most likely they will settle and all that stuff will never be heard in
court. 

>Donna will be painted as
>      greedy and it will be asserted that the Lewis searched for the
>      diagnosis they wanted and it blew up in their faces and now she
>      wants money for it. It won't be pretty and she will have brought
>      it all on herself. 

  Again, painted to whom? The serious media seems to be pretty fair to her and
Reggie, and maybe she doesn't listen to the tabloid stuff. She may never see
all this muck you speak about. She may not even be living around here any
more and I doubt it will be national news for all that long a period of time.

>      I'm a liberal with several libertarian beliefs but I firmly believe 
>      that the litigiousness so prevalent today is a major financial burden
>      on the economy and a major reason for skyrocketing medical costs and
>      it's largely driven by fee hungry attorneys and it needs to be stopped.
    
  Or so Rush would like us to believe. And in a nation of 250,000,000 people he
seems to be able to come up with 4 or 5 examples at will of OUTRAGEOUS
miscarriages of justice while ignoring the vast majority of what goes on in
thousands of courtrooms around the country every day. 

  For every big settlement I've heard of I've personally seen several more
cases where a lawyer has told someone with a legitimate grievance to forget
it because it would be impossible to prove or too costly to pursue.

  George
110.937CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 17:5312
RE            <<< Note 110.935 by CAM::WAY "and keep me steadfast" >>>

>I think George doesn't like sports call-in shows cause he can't get instant
>access to debate with each caller.
>
>Actually, I think George has missed his calling (no pun intended).  He should
>be a radio-sports-talk-show host......

  What you are saying is no doubt true but I think it applies to a lot more
noters in this file than just myself.

  George
110.938CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 17:5815
RE        <<< Note 110.934 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>

>Folks, we've got some real gems in this string...

  Again I agree, on this topic I am biased and I do argue from my point of
view, however you are naive if you think the other side of this debate which
you hear on TV and read in the papers is any less biased and not based entirely
on politics. 

  Doctors, hospitals, and drug companies stand to save millions in profits
if a lid can be put on med mal cases. This attack against med mal lawyers
has been bought and paid for regardless of how each of us feels about it's
merits.

  George
110.939sign me upHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed May 01 1996 17:5810
Wail, I don't know how anyone really feels about anything but I, for one,
would like to be a radio-sports-talk-show host.

Let me see: you get paid to run your mouth about sprots. Sounds good to
me. 

And din't some sage once say that the way to success was to (a) find
something you like to do and (2) figger out how to get paid for it.

TTom
110.940caint tellHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed May 01 1996 18:0312
>view, however you are naive if you think the other side of this debate which

So since I don't think that then I guess I'm not naive.

But then again, if'n you're easily duped, innocent, ignorant and just
plain stupid, you might not know if'n you're naive even if'n you are
which you don't think you are but caint be totally sure since many of the
prevailing biases don't fully explain nothing.

I'm still interested in that party, though...

TTom
110.941you're in a hole George, stop diggingBSS::NEUZILWed May 01 1996 18:125
    So now George is an expert on Rush.  I still cain' believe someone
    would subject themselves to such torture by listening to radio shows
    they obvioulsy abhor.
    
    Kevin
110.942CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 18:166
  Always know your opposition.

  Remember Patton standing on the hill blasting the Axis forces saying
something to the effect, "Ha, Romel, I read your book".

  George
110.943Unless WSJ is not serious media, a fair pointAKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. Bull...Wed May 01 1996 18:4111
    > Again, painted to whom? The serious media seems to be pretty fair to her 
    > and Reggie, 
    
    The Wall st. Journal and certain segments in the Globe have come after
    Lewis pretty strongly (said segments being McDonough, Shaughnessy..).
    Weei's Sarandis and Andleman, normally to be found on the liberal side
    of a question were quick to adopt the Lewis takes drugs allegation.
    
    In fact the Lewis mud-sliding appears orchestrated IMHO.  I would love
    to know just how she came about her decision to make this suit.
    
110.944CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed May 01 1996 18:5119
  I think it's pretty obvious that she's not bothered by that mud slinging,
and/or she has faith that the people she cares about will see through it. 

  As for why she brought the suit, it seems to have merit and the deadline for
filing was approaching. 

  I believe that she should sue the bastard. It appeared that what the doctor
did was at best irresponsible and I remember feeling that way at the time. A
team of 12 of the top cardiac people in the world had examined Reggie and told
him he was in danger. This guy seems to have come along, told Reggie and his
wife what they wanted to hear, talked them into changing hospitals so they
wouldn't hear the team any more and they believed him. In the end it cost
Reggie his life. 

  I don't see the harm in letting a jury of Massachusetts citizens hear the
case to judge it on it's merits. If he's not responsible, what does he have to
hide? 

  George
110.945MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed May 01 1996 19:2730
    >> This guy seems to have come along, told Reggie and his wife what 
    >> they wanted to hear, talked them into changing hospitals so they
    >> wouldn't hear the team any more and they believed him. In the end 
    >> it cost Reggie his life. 

       Get your facts straight before you render an opinion. Just for a
       nice change of pace. He isn't some kind guy who came along. He's
       an eminent cardiac specialist who the Lewis' sought out. Mudge
       and Brigham and Women's don't have to drum up business. It was
       largely Donna's choice to have Reggie move. If I'm the insurance
       company my position is that she wanted to protect Reggie's in-
       come so she pushed for a new doctor who would tell them what they
       wanted to hear. There are also Globe reports that Mudge may have
       told the Lewis' that Reggie condition was much more severe than 
       he originally believed and Reggie could not continue to play. 
       Was it Reggie's choice to continue? Who knows? Let's wait until
       the facts come out. I just hope when the facts do come out that
       Reggie's rep remains intact because I was a huge fan of him as
       a human being not just a ballplayer and would have preferred
       that he had been allowed to rest in peace. Conisder that guys
       like myself who is/was a huge Reggie fan and Nazz who is/was a 
       huge Reggie fan and who knew him personally are aginst this lawsuit 
       and George Maiewski, amateur ambulance chaser, is all for it.
    
    
       BTW - I think it's preety cute how you start off with the "serious
             media blah blah blah" but when its cited that the Globe and
             the WSJ have published reports about alleged drug use you
             switch to "I'm sure she's not bothered by that mudslinging".
             You're nothing if not flexible.
110.946lose insurance money?ESOSRV::BATORWed May 01 1996 20:106
    It seems to me she has lots to lose.  If the drug-use is ever
    substantiated, then she loses the insurance money she already
    collected. That policy had a null and void feature about drugs.
    
    This is independent of any malpractice insurance she may be going
    after. 
110.947The Slurs have only just begunAKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. Bull...Wed May 01 1996 20:2214
    > If the drug-use is ever
    >    substantiated, then she loses the insurance money she already
    >    collected. That policy had a null and void feature about drugs.
    
    I'm sure that has a statute of limitations too and is a done deal, paid
    out and probably gone.  It's one thing not to pay it, another to try to
    get it back - regardless of anything that could come out here that suit
    would be surely more difficult than the Harris-Lewis suit.
    
    The Lewis family just had a big win from the NU announcement.  This is
    probably a winnable case but if it proceeds I'm afraid the drug card
    will be played heavily by what can be looked upon as a team defense
    utilizing elements of the media already seen to have sided against
    Reggie.
110.948CHEFS::7A1_GRNProbably somewhat reluctantThu May 02 1996 10:496
    .934
    
    Cheers TTom.
    
    
    CHARLEY
110.949CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 12:3324
RE        <<< Note 110.945 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove" >>>

>       I just hope when the facts do come out that
>       Reggie's rep remains intact because I was a huge fan of him as
>       a human being not just a ballplayer and would have preferred
>       that he had been allowed to rest in peace. 

  All she's asking for is a fair trial. Maybe if you were a better fan you
would have confidence that she's telling the truth about Reggie and that there
is no big scandal that's going to be revealed. Donna Lewis was there. She
knew Reggie, she's already been through the drug stories and she talked to this
Doctor 1st hand. If she says that she wants to go ahead with the suit who
are you or anyone else to say she should not?

>Conisder that guys
>       like myself who is/was a huge Reggie fan and Nazz who is/was a 
>       huge Reggie fan and who knew him personally are against this lawsuit 

  Donna Lewis is looking out for her kids and their future. If she wins a
settlement it will be real money to pay real bills and send Reggie's kids to a
real college and secure their real future which is a lot more important than
the fantasy land of fandom. 

  George
110.950IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu May 02 1996 13:038
>  Donna Lewis is looking out for her kids and their future. If she wins a
>settlement it will be real money to pay real bills and send Reggie's kids to a
>real college and secure their real future which is a lot more important than
>the fantasy land of fandom. 

How many million real dollars of Reggie's salary did she get to use for
these purposes already?
110.951BSS::MENDEZThu May 02 1996 13:083
    In the words of the Eagles "Lets kill all the lawyers, Kill 'em
    tonight"
    
110.952CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 13:2814
  Right, why take sides with a widow when you can take sides with our nations
fine medical establishment. Why should Reggie's kids get the money when it
could be spent buying a few more Mercedes for some rich cardiac specialist who
let his ego get in the way of serving his patient.

  At the very least let's get rid of the lawyers who's great sin is to create a
level playing field between for mega-profit industries like the AMA backed
medical institutions and individuals like Reggie's family who get the shaft.
Without Lawyers there would be no end to how rich these guys could get. And
hey, in the long run that would help us. Maybe we could get jobs clipping
their hedges and painting their yachts.

  Gimmie that 'ol trickle down,
  George
110.953IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu May 02 1996 14:1519
>  Right, why take sides with a widow when you can take sides with our nations
>fine medical establishment. Why should Reggie's kids get the money when it
>could be spent buying a few more Mercedes for some rich cardiac specialist who
>let his ego get in the way of serving his patient.

Sounds like you've already made your judgement, George.  I'm simply waiting
for an answer to my question in .950.  I'm trying to figure out how
financially insecure their future is right now - in .949 you're citing this
as one of the reasons for the lawsuit.

>Why should Reggie's kids get the money when it
>could be spent buying a few more Mercedes for some rich cardiac specialist who
>let his ego get in the way of serving his patient.

Conversely, why should Reggie's kids get the money if the guy wasn't
negligent?  Last time I checked, being wealthy wasn't a crime in and of
itself.  This thing hasn't even gone to court yet - given some of your
earlier notes about the legal system, I'm surprised that you've already found
this guy guilty before the trial.
110.954$27M + so farESOSRV::BATORThu May 02 1996 14:167
    re: .950  So far she only received:
    
        $17M life insurance
    
    	$10M + remainder of Celtics guaranteed salary
    
    sounds like she needs some pocket change
110.955SNAX::ERICKSONThu May 02 1996 14:2817
    
    	IMO, there are tons of lawyers in this country and law suits all
    over the place, because of people like Donna Harris-Lewis. Its people
    like her that are greedy, and want there cake and be able to eat it
    too. Reggie had anywhere from 15-20 doctors analyze his tests and run
    there own test. The Lewis's choose to pick the option they preferred.
    I hope the case gets thrown out of court, based on not having any
    merit.
    	 IMO she is plain stupid for filing a malpractice suit. If ANYTHING
    negative is revealed about Reggie Lewis, she risks losing her share of the
    17 million dollars, the insurance companies already paid. The Celtics
    paid her the remaining portion of Reggie's salary which was ~6
    million dollars, isn't ~6 million dollars enough for her to live on?
    Even an idiot could put the money in a regular bank savings account
    earning 3% interest, and live off of the interest.
    
    Ron 
110.956CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 14:4115
RE  <<< Note 110.953 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "It's Baseball And You're An American" >>>

>Sounds like you've already made your judgement, George.  I'm simply waiting
>for an answer to my question in .950.  

  Funny, I don't see you criticizing the other guys who are saying she should
not file the suit. If I'm jumping to conclusions saying she should sue why
don't you call them for saying she should not?

  Yes I have my feelings and they are slanted towards Donna Lewis but that's
not my argument for say the case should go forward. I believe the case should
go forward because Donna Lewis knows a lot more about it than any of us and
she feels she has a case. She is also well aware of the risks.

  George
110.957So, legal opinion on insurance company reclaimsAKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. Bull...Thu May 02 1996 14:539
    George, perhps you could reply to the question raised about the
    insurance company possibly reclaiming money as a result of possible
    drug use coming out of the suit.  I did my best on that question.
    
    The furthur slander done to Reggie Lewis using this suit as the vehicle
    is the major reason Tommy,Nazz and myself and I'm sure others with it
    wasn't happening.  The usual right wing stuff and your rebuttal is fine
    junk but right now is obscuring the major issue.  If Ron's question has
    merit that would put the drug question right back in play.
110.958CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 15:1317
RE<<< Note 110.957 by AKOCOA::BREEN "Better days are coming bye and bye. Bull..." >>>

>    George, perhps you could reply to the question raised about the
>    insurance company possibly reclaiming money as a result of possible
>    drug use coming out of the suit.  I did my best on that question.

  To reclaim the money they have to prove that he lied when he said he didn't
take drugs. So far every investigation has indicated that he was telling the
truth and the person closest to him doesn't see this as a problem.

>If Ron's question has
>    merit that would put the drug question right back in play.

  What's the harm in putting the question into play if they are confident that
they can field it? It's not like it's anything new.

  George
110.959IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu May 02 1996 15:2114
>  Funny, I don't see you criticizing the other guys who are saying she should
>not file the suit. If I'm jumping to conclusions saying she should sue why
>don't you call them for saying she should not?

7 lines of text, and you still didn't answer the question.

I think you're jumping to conclusions to regarding innocence/guilt, not for
saying she should sue.  Whether she should file or not is her own business.  I
don't mind you saying she should file - it's a free country.  The same goes for
those who say she shouldn't. 

I'm simply questioning that the money involved will aid in "looking out for her
kids and their future", and questioning it as a motivation for the lawsuit.
Beyond a certain point, you're set money-wise.
110.960Any number of things can sully Reggie's reputation n from a trialTNPUBS::NAZZAROBest of luck, Marcus!Thu May 02 1996 15:2821
    The Wall Street Journal investigation, Derrick Lewis, and the
    Northeastern AD (Cohen) all indicate that Reggie was a drug user.
    The only investigation that says he wasn't was the Northeastern report,
    which only stated that there was not enough evidence available to prove
    he was a drug user.
    
    I knew Reggie since he was a freshman at Northeastern.  I hung out with
    him in a large group after games, and knew him as a Celtic.  I never
    saw any indication that he used drugs.  However, I was never in a
    situation where it would be likely that he would use drugs.  I firmly
    believe Reggie was not a drug user, but I can't conclusively say he
    wasn't.  If this goes to trial, I expect lowlifes like Derrick Lewis
    will surface and attempt to make a score based on Reggie's mamory,
    selling their story to the sleaziest newsmagazine available. And there
    will be "investigative reporters" out to make a name for themselves off
    of Reggie's corpse.  Not to mention Mudge and the others in the lawsuit
    vigorously defending themselves.  None of this would occur if Donna
    would just let Reggie and his reputation be.  SHe has made millions of
    dollars from his death.  How much more does she need?
    
    NAZZ
110.961CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 15:3330
RE  <<< Note 110.959 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "It's Baseball And You're An American" >>>

>I'm simply questioning that the money involved will aid in "looking out for her
>kids and their future", and questioning it as a motivation for the lawsuit.
>Beyond a certain point, you're set money-wise.

  I'm sure that there are people mowing lawns and pushing burgers at restaurants
that look at us green with envy when they see the benefits packages we get and
would have a hard time understanding why we were envious of a widow with a
couple million dollars.

  Then again there seem to be people in Mexico who look at those lawn mowing
jobs green with envy and risk taking a beating at the border to get away from
the chicken stretch them make at home figuring that mowing lawns in the U.S. at
least they get to eat each day. 

  Then there are people down in Guatemala risking far more than a beating
to cross the border into Mexico because they see that as a move up in their
life style.

  At the other end members of the British Royal family seem to go into debt if
they take home less than $100,000 a month and Billionaires like Ross Perot
take their lunch to work in a brown bag because they don't feel they can afford
to eat out. 

  How much is too much? Beyond what point are you set money-wise? I guess it
depends on how much the next guy up the rung is making and how annoying the
guy below you is for moving while you try to stand on his fingers.

  George
110.962IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu May 02 1996 15:355
A very nice description of relative living conditions throughout the world,
George.

And your answer to .950?
110.963CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 15:4012
RE  <<< Note 110.950 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "It's Baseball And You're An American" >>>

>How many million real dollars of Reggie's salary did she get to use for
>these purposes already?

  Ok, here's your .950. What is it that you say I'm not answering?

  Literally you are asking me how much of the money that she got has she
already spent. How should I know how much money she already spent? And what
difference does it make?

  George
110.964AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. Bull...Thu May 02 1996 15:4717
    >   The Wall Street Journal investigation, Derrick Lewis, and the
    >    Northeastern AD (Cohen) all indicate that Reggie was a drug user.
    
    I've seen all this including the Globe which had all the information
    out a year before wsj.  All the wsj ever did was point a finger at the
    Celtics as culprits in the sense of hindering the otherwise unfounded
    drug investigations.  Nazz you left out the autopsy which did not
    indicate drug use.
    
    People complicate the Reggie Lewis entire story.  It's much more
    simple:  Black + Athlete + Popular + Rich = TARGET.  Why can't Mrs
    Lewis understand this and understand her enemies better.  They will use
    their control of the press and other media and if even someone who
    believes in his heart that Reggie was drug free thinks that any real
    evidence ever surfaced that he wasn't then Joe Raggs will be all over
    the Lewis name and family if this suit is pursued. 
    
110.966IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu May 02 1996 16:0622
Actually, I'm asking what she received, not what she spent.

An earlier reply from someone else answered the question - I just wanted
to see if you'd do it before spinning off into another issue.

A conservative estimate of the amount of money paid out via his contract,
etc. is $6 million (which would just be his contract money).  It's a decent
enough chunk of change to set aside money for a couple of kids to go to 
college and pay a few bills.  And if it's $17 million, $27 million, whatever,
I believe that to be even more true.  (Are there varying degrees of truth? :-)

***WARNING - GRATUITOUS CHAIN YANK AHEAD***

It'd be interesting to see who's worth more money right now - Donna 
Harris-Lewis or Dr. Gilbert Mudge.

***END OF CHAIN YANK***

If the guy was negligent, yes, he deserves to have the screws put to him.
And I can see a number of motivating factors for Mrs. Lewis to want to file
suit - I'm not sure whether or not I'd do so myself in the same position.  
But I disagree with you that paying the bills is a valid one.
110.967MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu May 02 1996 16:1416
    
      Roland, at this point it's pretty obvious that George was
     caught out quite badly with his statment that at least part
     of Donna Lewis-Harris' motive is to be able to provide for
     her kids' education. Her kids want for nothing unless though
     I guess it's possible that she intends to send them to Otis 
     Sistrunk's lama mater, the University of Mars. At this point
     your average person would just admit that they erred but more 
     and more with each reply it appears with George is not your 
     average person. You'll get to hear the GNP of every country 
     in sub-Saharan Africa and about farming techniques in Micronesia 
     before you'll hear George admit that he doesn't know what he's 
     talking about though it might be as obvious as a fart in church 
     to the rest of us.
    
    
110.968see pages 24-25 of GlobeESOSRV::BATORThu May 02 1996 16:4118
    on pages 24, 25 etc in the Globe today, there's a few more stories
    covering these entire pages.  some excerpts:
    
    . the insurance companies can reclaim the money IF fraud is proved;
    	i.e. he lied about drug use
    
    . Harris-Lewis has refused to allow her husband's name to be used
    	on a playground in his childhood neighborhood in Baltimore
    
    . Harris-Lewis has not helped Reggie's mother, Inez, who works as
    	a $5 /hour security guard
    
    . Harris-Lewis treated Reggie's family like tramps when they came
    	to Boston for the funeral, even making them use the toilet
    	in the basement
    
    etc.  too many details to type in here
    
110.969CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 17:3318
RE        <<< Note 110.967 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove" >>>

>At this point
>     your average person would just admit that they erred but more 
>     and more with each reply it appears with George is not your 
>     average person. 

  Tommy, you're a riot. You've taken hypocrisy places where people only dream
of going. This is probably the best description of you I've ever seen. I've
freely admitted when I was wrong several times but in my entire noting days
I've never seen someone refuse to admit failure the way that you can. 

  I have to admit when you dug yourself into your deepest hole your "logic
doesn't apply in the sports notes file" was the best refusal to admit defeat
that I've ever seen. A true classic. You have no idea how much I envy the
stones you showed coming up with that one. 

  George
110.970CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 17:4422
RE  <<< Note 110.966 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "It's Baseball And You're An American" >>>

>A conservative estimate of the amount of money paid out via his contract,
>etc. is $6 million (which would just be his contract money).  It's a decent
>enough chunk of change to set aside money for a couple of kids to go to 
>college and pay a few bills.  And if it's $17 million, $27 million, whatever,
>I believe that to be even more true.  (Are there varying degrees of truth? :-)

  Fine, I have no problem with that, but the implication seems to be that there
is this absolute line above which people are without want and below which
people struggle and that she is above this line and the typical middle class
sports fans is below it.

  I disagree that the line is absolute and I'm pretty confident that a large
plurality if not the majority of people with whom we share the planet would
not see that line drawn between the incomes of typical middle class Americans
and American athletes.

  I think we agree, however, that this is not the most important issue but
rather the negligence of the doctor is the thing that should be at issue.

  George
110.971BSS::NEUZILThu May 02 1996 17:598
    I'm not so sure that the negligence of the doctor should be the issue. 
    Reggie got one opinion from the Celtics doctors, and one from the other
    guy.  Why didn't they get another opinion to "break the tie", so to
    speak.  Perhaps Reggie was negligent.  To me it looks like they were
    looking for one answer, got it, and made the decision to play.  It
    didn't work out so now we have a law suit.
    
    Kevin
110.972CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 18:115
  Good point. That's just the type of thing people had in mind then they
invented the modern jury. 

  George 
110.973BSS::NEUZILThu May 02 1996 18:267
    Geez George,
    
    If'n it were my life at stake, I think I'd like to get another opinion
    before I died; not let a jury decide if the doctor was right after I
    died.
    
    Kevin
110.974CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 18:368
  Another good point but in this case it's too late for that. Reggie's gone
to Celtics Heaven and is shooting hoops with Len Bias while Johnny Most calls
the game.

  Here on earth if this case goes to trial the question you brought up is
just the sort of thing juries were invented to resolve.

  George
110.975MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu May 02 1996 18:549
    
  >> "logic doesn't apply in the sports notes file" 
    
      Care to point the actual quote out? It is nice to see that you have
      been sufficiently cowed to where you're conceding that points that
      were made twenty replies ago are "good points". And please read
      some of the details in the printed media. It's obvious that you
      haven't been and are just giving your usual knee-jerk defend-the-
      lawyers spiel.
110.976AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. Bull...Thu May 02 1996 18:544
    well I didn't get a globe today and I see IT has started.  Anything in
    there supporting the Mrs. Lewis side?  As long as its Mrs Lewis getting
    the incoming no problem but soon more night crawlers will come oozing
    forth with their "Reggie and I had a toke and a snort..."
110.977CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu May 02 1996 19:0226
RE        <<< Note 110.975 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove" >>>

>      Care to point the actual quote out? 

  You manage to find it and delete it or you just buying time?

>It is nice to see that you have
>      been sufficiently cowed to where you're conceding that points that
>      were made twenty replies ago are "good points". 

  I've never been called a cow before, there's a 1st. But you need a better
adding machine, the notes in which I referred to good points were only 1 or
2 notes back.

>And please read
>      some of the details in the printed media. It's obvious that you
>      haven't been and are just giving your usual knee-jerk defend-the-
>      lawyers spiel.

  Nice reply.

    Imrightyourwrongthemediabacksupmypointsothere

  Let me guess, late 14th century lower Antarctic proclamation style of debate.

  George
110.978MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu May 02 1996 19:4618
  >> I've never been called a cow before, 
  
     We'll be the judge of that.

  >> But you need a better adding machine, the notes in which I 
  >> referred to good points were only 1 or 2 notes back.

     And they're the same points that have been made time and again
     in this particular discussion only now you're modulating your
     position and conceding that they're valid points.     

  >> Imrightyourwrongthemediabacksupmypointsothere

     Nope, there's no right and wrong here. You'd just be on firmer
     ground if you weren't just guessing but actually knew what you
     were talking about.
    
110.979CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri May 03 1996 12:1225
RE        <<< Note 110.978 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove" >>>

>     And they're the same points that have been made time and again
>     in this particular discussion only now you're modulating your
>     position and conceding that they're valid points.     

  I don't believe you have made this point. I don't see any specific case
where I agreed to something I did not agree to earlier. In fact it's not
at all clear what you are talking about here.

>     Nope, there's no right and wrong here. You'd just be on firmer
>     ground if you weren't just guessing but actually knew what you
>     were talking about.
    
  No doubt this goes for many of us here from time to time including yourself.

>  >> I've never been called a cow before, 
>  
>     We'll be the judge of that.

  Actually I believe you called me a cowd which is another word for roast beef.

  I've never been called that before.

  George
110.980SNAX::ERICKSONFri May 03 1996 13:0722
    
    	Here are some of the quotes that I have read in the paper.
    
    Donna Harris-Lewis called Dr. Mudge on the phone 9/16/93 and told
    him, "Reggie died of the poisons that his mother gave him,". Reggie's
    mother has admitted to being a drug user. Now a jury will have to
    decide what Donna ment by this, was she implying that Reggies heart
    was defective because his mother did drugs while she was pregnant?
    Or that Reggie used drugs, because he was born with drug contents
    already in his blood stream?
    
    	Here is another quote,  from 7/27/93, from Donna Harris-Lewis,
    she allegedly left this on Dr. Mudge's answering machine.
    
    "There were many things that we could never tell you. There were many
    things that you didn't know"
    
    	How is that for opening up a can of worms, a good lawyer will
    drill her to death on this alleged quote.
    
    
    Ron
110.981CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri May 03 1996 13:3519
RE                     <<< Note 110.980 by SNAX::ERICKSON >>>

>    	How is that for opening up a can of worms, a good lawyer will
>    drill her to death on this alleged quote.
    
  A good lawyer could certainly try to impeach her on those statements but as
you mentioned she can say she meant Reggie was born with the problem due to
drug use during pregnancy or maybe she has some other plausible explanation. 

  The real problem she has to get over is showing a significant financial loss.
The best shot the defense has at keeping a verdict low is by having experts
testify that even if Reggie had lived he wouldn't have been able to play pro
ball for a multi-million dollar salary. 

  Everything in this case keeps pointing to a settlement. The defense seems a
lot more passion about this case than the plaintiff and both sides seem to have
a lot more to lose if the trial goes against them than they could possibly win.

  George 
110.982MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longBeat em BucsFri May 03 1996 16:238
	I just waded through this latest string.  I can't for the
	life of me see how people can say the ::SPROTS is not 
	entertaining.

	Yunz guys slay me!


	billl
110.983SALEM::DODAA little too smart for a big dumb townFri May 03 1996 18:0113
I'm with Bill. Haven't been in here for a few days.

Glad to see Tommy is fighting the good fight.

Keep up the good work.

Oh, and George what exactly is the difference between those 
lawyers that those greedy evyl corporations and insurance 
companies employ and say your SO? 

Aside from salary that is...

daryll
110.984CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri May 03 1996 18:2236
RE  <<< Note 110.983 by SALEM::DODA "A little too smart for a big dumb town" >>>

>Oh, and George what exactly is the difference between those 
>lawyers that those greedy evyl corporations and insurance 
>companies employ and say your SO? 

  It's been my experience from the lawyers I've met that fairly early after
graduating from law school people seem to gravitate toward specialties in law
much as they do in many areas. As one would expect, some favor civil law, some
favor criminal law, some gravitate toward finance while others seem to dislike
that type of work. 

  But I've also noticed that some people naturally gravitate toward prosecution
and plaintiff's work while others naturally gravitate toward defense. The
strategies in those areas are quite different, plaintiff's lawyers and
prosecutors have the burden of proof so they seem to be the aggressive types
who like to challenge and attack while defense lawyers are somewhat more laid
back and make their living shooting holes in the other sides case. 

  The main difference between Patty and Corporate defense lawyers is that she
is the Type A prosecution/plaintiff type that likes to build cases and attack.
She loved her semester working in the prosecutors office as a student lawyer as
much as anything she's done in the law and she loves plaintiff's work in civil
cases. She generally hates defense work and never feels quite right doing it
although she just signed up to do public defender work in Plymouth county so
it should be fun seeing how that turns out.

  And yes, like most prosecutors and plaintiff's lawyers she doesn't make close
to what defense lawyers make. Except for a very small subset of the plaintiffs
lawyers and a few top prosecutors like Marcia Clark, most prosecutors and
plaintiff's lawyers don't make a great deal except for that one big case that
comes along from time to time. Defense seems to be more steady work. That's
often what you see most in the really big Boston firms like Hale & Dore or
Ropes & Gray and that's where you see the big 6 figure incomes. 

  George
110.985C's guaranteed of a solid pickPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Jun 21 1996 22:128
110.986Parade in JunePCBUOA::MORGANSat Jun 22 1996 10:073
    This probably paves the way for "The Return of Stojko".
    
    					Steve
110.987PECAD8::CHILDSMon Jun 24 1996 10:5412
 Wow, well I asked ML to surprise me and I guess he did. While the improved
 draft posistion is nice, I'm waiting to see what he does on the FA market.
 Think about how many franchise type players and players who think they are
 franchise are out there. While nothing would please me more than to snatch
 Zo away from Riley, I could live with anyone of a number of other guys as
 well. I don't think Riley will give up Zo though. His ego desperately wants
 to win a championship with a real center as the dominating factor. In NY he
 had a small forward trapped inside a center's body that he thought he could
 win with.................

 mike 
110.988Good news on the Green Front...WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jun 24 1996 13:2015
    
    
        What a weekend!! Yanks sweep tribe in OLowO, and finally I see some
    light at the end of the tunnel. Celtics made a great trade getting rid
    of that stiff Montross and moving up in the draft.
    
    
         I just hope they stay patient now. Get a good player ie John
    Wallace on Wednesday. Stay out of the FA market unless Zo or Dikembe
    will take less money (cap) to come here, than use Our pick and Dallas's
    pick next year either to trade up or get an early lottery pick (ours)
    and get another young talent in the middle of the pack. (Dallas)
    
    
    ML does have a brain!!! :-)
110.989IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jun 24 1996 13:389
>         I just hope they stay patient now. Get a good player ie John
>    Wallace on Wednesday.

If they get John Wallace, I will be a very happy man.  If they go for a 
big man, I will be happy.  If they go for a guard, I will give up on the
Celtics as hopeless. 

BTW - I may end up eating crow after all - Marbury *may* be around for the
Bucks' pick.
110.990SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jun 24 1996 13:417
    
    	If they can't move up any further in the draft, they will
    take Antoine Walker. Walker was listed as 6-8 in the Kentucky media
    guide, but measured 6-10 at the Chicago combine. Either that or
    ML is stupid and will take another SG, in Ray Allen.
    
    Ron
110.991POWDML::GARBARINOMon Jun 24 1996 16:554
Great move by Boston.  They get rid of Montross and his salary, move
up to where they have a shot at an actual impact player, AND get Dallas'
#1 next year.  This deal alone should keep everyone off ML's back for
the next year (even if he DOES stink as a coach).
110.992more will have to followHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jun 24 1996 17:0310
>...  This deal alone should keep everyone off ML's back for
>the next year (even if he DOES stink as a coach).

Wail, the jury is still out. From what I'm hearing, ML is threatening to
make some more moves.

Then he'll actually have to draft and sign someone. Then that person will
have to perform. I'm staying tuned.

TTom
110.993CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 13:565
  So for those few of us that don't follow College hoops, who is this Antoine
Walker and what can we expect from him in the NBA? 

  George
110.994MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 27 1996 13:582
    
      Read today's Globe.
110.995quicklyHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 27 1996 14:0016
Antoine Walker was one of the main main for the Kentucky Wildcats and
helped lead them to lasted year's championship.

He's listed at 6'8", 224. He averaged 15 points and 8 boards per game
which aint bad at all but when you consider that he played just a little
more than half a game becuase of Pitino's system, it's phenomenal.

Also, he benefits further from Pitino's system because he went through a
whole lot less wear and tear than say John Wallace who played almost all
of almost all the games.

He's big, strong, quick, fast and can play either small or big forward.

In case you caint tell, I'm a fan or his.

TTom
110.996HTH'sWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Jun 27 1996 15:5113
    
    
        Ttom stop messin around with George!!
    
    
        George honestly. He is a 6-4 White guy he was born to Luke and
    Leia skyWAlker in 1958 in a small town called Tatooine. He doesn't have
    much game but the Yuppie Muppies from Boston and Cambridge would love
    to buy him a cappucino after a game some night.
    
    
    
    Chap
110.997CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastThu Jun 27 1996 16:301
Chappy, you're cold.
110.998...and I didn't have to read the GlobePHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jun 27 1996 16:301
110.999CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 17:3811
RE        <<< Note 110.994 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need to talk figure skating." >>>

>      Read today's Globe.

  Ok Tommy, I'll take that as an "I don't know". Sorry, didn't mean to call
you on an area that you only pretend to understand.

  Of those people who understand College Basketball can anyone give an opinion
on how Walker will do on the Celtics and in the NBA in general?

  George
110.1000tricksHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 27 1996 17:4415
George,  I can tell a a trick question when I see it:

>  Of those people who understand College Basketball can anyone give an opinion
>on how Walker will do on the Celtics and in the NBA in general?

Why caint someone who understands the NBA comment on this?

Mike Heiser posted the opinion of someone who fits your criterion, Rick
Ptitino. He said he'd be a star within 5 years.

And I guess my earlier commentary in a decent and honorable attempt to
answer your query din't count cause I aint no expert, neither. Or, like
the GLob, din't you read that, neither...

TTom
110.10011001 reasons given, 1001 reasons ignored by JorgePHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jun 27 1996 17:491
110.1002MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 27 1996 17:5419
    >> Ok Tommy, I'll take that as an "I don't know". Sorry, didn't 
    >> mean to call you on an area that you only pretend to understand.

       I feel so ashamed. If you really wanted to know about Antione
       Walker, you'd pick up the Globe and read one of the four articles
       on him. I'm sure the Herald has a few as well. RTFM. All you really
       want to do is chat. Fess up. Personally, Walker is who I wanted at 
       the six spot in the draft all along.
    
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 278.121                     1996 NBA Draft                       121 of 189
MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove."             2 lines  25-JUN-1996 12:59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
      Antoine Walker will look great in a Celtics uniform.
    
110.1003CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 18:1210
RE        <<< Note 110.1000 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>

>Why caint someone who understands the NBA comment on this?
>
>Mike Heiser posted the opinion of someone who fits your criterion, Rick
>Ptitino. He said he'd be a star within 5 years.

  I wasn't talking about you or Mike. That was aimed the noter specified.

  George
110.1004CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 18:1612
RE       <<< Note 110.1002 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need to talk figure skating." >>>

>      Antoine Walker will look great in a Celtics uniform.
    
  Ok, I can understand that someone with your fascination with figure skating
would be concerned with how he looked. I was looking for some opinions on how
well he would play on the Celtics in particular.

  Sorry if I missed some note off in some other topic but I don't think it's
a crime to ask for opinions about a new Celtics player in the Celtics note.

  George
110.1006CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 18:4317
RE       <<< Note 110.1005 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need to talk figure skating." >>>

>      Read the newspaper. There are over 5,000 words on Antoine Walker
>     in one local paper alone. 

  Ok, let's see, we now have

    - Tommy Rule #101.5B, no talking about the Celtics in the Celtics notes
      file and
    - Tommy Rule #18293.5H, no discussing anything that might be covered by
      the Boston Globe

  I swear you've got more rules than any 10 people I know. By any chance do you
dress up like a little old lady pull your hair in a bun and work as a
substitute school teacher? If so I think we might have met once. 

  George
110.1007MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 27 1996 19:044
    
        You forgot rule #1: Don't ask stupid questions. If you
        obeyed that one we wouldn't be having this discussion.
    
110.1008ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsThu Jun 27 1996 19:065
    
>        You forgot rule #1: Don't ask stupid questions. If you
>        obeyed that one we wouldn't be having this discussion.
    
    But... but... I thought there _were_ no stupid questions???????
110.1009CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westThu Jun 27 1996 19:2416
    
    We apparently have a bunch of bozos in here!  If the answer to
    questions like Georges is going to be answered by "RTFM" then I think
    we should delete this notes conference since ALL of the information is
    available in other forums.
    
    BTW, as someone who does NOT live anywhere near Boston, but has still
    followed the Celtics, what does TFM say?
    
    All I know is he appears to be someone who will fill in nicely at the
    small forward position, probably be a starter in a couple years, but
    never be an all-star.  Anyone have any specifics on him or comparisons
    to some of the players of the past?
    
    Marc
    
110.1010I liked the draft pick and think he will be a starILBBAK::SILVESTRISoar with the Eagles!Thu Jun 27 1996 19:286
>>    BTW, as someone who does NOT live anywhere near Boston, but has still
>>    followed the Celtics, what does TFM say?
  
	Read The F.... Manual ...
  
	The standard answer to any users questions :-)
110.1011some dataHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 27 1996 19:2941
Marc,

RTFM: Read The Freakin (closely related recognizable obscenity) Manual!~

But a lot of people don't have clean hands in this matter. A question was
posed and there were some attempts by others but some were evidently more
interested in bating, re-bating and master-bating than asking or
answering any real question.


*  JOHN WALLACE
  
   Born: 2/9/74, Rochester, N.Y.
   High School: Greece-Athena (Rochester, N.Y.)
   College: Syracuse
   Height: 6-8
   Weight: 225
   1995-96 stats: 22.2 ppg, 8.7 rpg
   Profile: Returning to Syracuse for his senior season has made all the
   difference. . . . After declaring himself eligible for the 1995
   selection, Wallace withdrew from the draft, returned to school and led
   the Orangemen to the championship game. . . . Added an excellent jump
   shot this past season to go along with his otherwise strong offensive
   game.
   
*  ANTOINE WALKER
   
   Born: 8-12-76, Chicago, Ill.
   High School: Mt. Carmel (Chicago, Ill.)
   College: Kentucky
   Height: 6-8
   Weight: 224
   1995-96 stats: 15.2 ppg, 8.4 rpg
   Profile: Very versatile as he can play any of the frontcourt
   positions. . . . Only a sophomore, he has tremendous abilities that
   need developing. . . . Led the champion Wildcats in rebounding and was
   second in scoring. . . . Nearly doubled his scoring average in his
   final season in Lexington. . . . Building his upper-body would be a
   plus, but that should come with age. . . . A top-10 pick.

TTom
110.1012CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 19:3116
RE   <<< Note 110.1007 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need to piss in some dog's dish." >>>

    
>        You forgot rule #1: Don't ask stupid questions. If you
>        obeyed that one we wouldn't be having this discussion.
    
  Going into a sports notes file where you know there are lots of College
basketball fans and asking for opinions about a former college player despite
having read Bob Ryan's "Walker must be good, Larry Bird didn't beg off when
asked for his opinion" sure sounds reasonable to me.

  At any rate, no matter, I've seen the notes real fans like Mike posted in the
other string. You're secret about having nothing to add on this topic is safe
with me. 

  George
110.1014Drafts are fun, but then they go and ruin it by playing gamesEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 27 1996 19:3318
    
>    We apparently have a bunch of bozos in here!  If the answer to
>    questions like Georges is going to be answered by "RTFM" then I think
>    we should delete this notes conference since ALL of the information is
>    available in other forums.
    
    True, but there is unsolicited, half-assed opinion in this forum that
    is unavailable anywhere else, at any price.
    
    Such as:
    
    Celtics get Antoine Walker.  Big deal.  He's a nice player, but no 
    franchise.  The guy cain't even shoot.  Get a franchise, or about 
    3-4 more Antoine Walkers, or we're just looking at more sub-to-.500 
    seasons and lottery misses for the indefinite future...
    
    glenn
    
110.1015MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 27 1996 19:3312
    
  >> We apparently have a bunch of bozos in here!  
    
     Speak for yourself, Marc. Why the hell would anyone, who really
     careed to know, want the watered down SPORTS version of who Antoine 
     Walker is, was or will be when you can spend fifty cents get a 
     newspaper and find out every damn thing you ever wanted to know 
     about the guy and then some from some of the best sportswriters
     in the country? Doesn't make any sense to me. 
    
    
    
110.1016CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 19:3713
RE  < Note 110.1015 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need an entire notes file to shove." >>>

>     Speak for yourself, Marc. Why the hell would anyone, who really
>     careed to know, want the watered down SPORTS version of who Antoine 
>     Walker is, was or will be when you can spend fifty cents get a 
>     newspaper 

  Is that really how you feel about this file in general? All our opinions are
"watered down SPORTS versions" of what we can read in the paper? 

  If that's the case, why do you follow this file?

  George
110.1017MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 27 1996 19:4010
  >> If that's the case, why do you follow this file?
    
     George, my point is that you really don't even care. You're just
     talking to be talking, as usual. You readily admit that you don't
     watch college basketball. And that you didn't know the Celtics 
     don't have cheerleaders tells me that you don't watch them at 
     all either. Next year you won't watch Antoine Walker twice so
     why you care who he is now escapes me.
    
110.1018CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 19:4814
  Tommy, I think there are things you can take to calm down.

  Frustrated by Ryan's meaningless article in the Globe this morning I though
I'd ask a casual question in this notes file and thanks to other noters who
really do have an amazing understanding of this game I got my answer. 

  And of course thanks to you I now have plenty of the normal stuff you shovel
so now I have to go clean my shoes as well.

  Thanks to those who answered my question. This guy sounds good, should be
fun to watch.

  George
110.1019made me giggleGENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Thu Jun 27 1996 20:048
>  Ok, I can understand that someone with your fascination with figure skating
>would be concerned with how he looked. I was looking for some opinions on how
>well he would play on the Celtics in particular.

	Man, I hate it when Coca Cola comes out my nose from laughing.  I
	could swear I heard some teeth grinding from out Tommy's way.  :*)

Claybone
110.1020MKOTS3::BREENThu Jun 27 1996 20:197
    > what does TFM say?
    
    You must mean TcM.  He probably doesn't have much to say about Walker
    but I'm thinking he's dancing so hard after seeing the Knicks choices
    that you can hear the nickel jingle.
    
    I'll ask him.
110.1021Duh.MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Thu Jun 27 1996 20:518
    
    
    >> Frustrated by Ryan's meaningless article in the Globe this morning 
    >> I though
    
       Too bad you weren't smart enough to read Peter May's article.
       You know the one underneath the four-inch high bold headline
       that reads, "Happy Landings".
110.1022CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 27 1996 21:1710
  Ok Tommy, you can stop now. Thanks to the guys in this file who understand
college basketball my question has been answered. Your secret about knowing
nothing on this topic is safe for another go around.

  Nice talk about how all the opinions in this file represent "the watered down
SPORTS version" of a topic. I'm still curious as to why you follow this file
if that's the way you feel.

  George
110.1024PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Jun 27 1996 23:4210
110.1025CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westThu Jun 27 1996 23:4836
    
    
    I'd like to thank the people who actually provided useful information
    concerning Antoine Walker.
    
    >Speak for yourself, Marc. Why the hell would anyone, who really
    >careed to know, want the watered down SPORTS version of who Antoine
    >Walker is, was or will be when you can spend fifty cents get a
    >newspaper and find out every damn thing you ever wanted to know
    >about the guy and then some from some of the best sportswriters
    >in the country? Doesn't make any sense to me.
    
    Hmm, could it be that my "fifty cent newspaper" says the following:
    
    	Boston Celtics
    	1, Antoine Waler, F, Kentucky (6). 2, Steve Hamer, C, Tennessee
        (38)
    
    Not a lot of useful information here.  Since my only college hoops
    knowledge comes from the NCAA tourney and weekly standings and since I
    was not really impressed with Walker in the 2 or so games I saw him
    play, I thought I'd come into a forum of like-minded people who may be
    better informed on who he was, and what his real potential was.
    
    Instead I get the same old froathing at the mouth and spittle from you
    as you always spew.  Once again showing your discontent with the world
    and never being able to say anything useful or productive (outside of
    the boxing note) in this NOTES conference.  Your constant berating of
    others is extremely tiresome and unwarrented.  Have a life (and not
    necessarily a good one).
    
    Marc
    
    P.S.  Don't bother responding because I'm going on vacation and doing a
    SET SEEN/SINCE=TODAY when I get back.
    
110.1026NQOS01::nqsrv120.nqo.dec.com::may_brBRUCE MAYFri Jun 28 1996 04:224
tommy, who are the Celtics?   you see, my wife didn't renew our newspaper 
subscriptin because we were gonna be on a vacation ( a story carried 
elsewhere)...  
110.1028CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Jun 28 1996 12:443
You guys amaze me sometimes.  You really do.


110.1029GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Fri Jun 28 1996 13:444
    
    	Geez Marc, who peed in your Wheaties?
    
    Claybone
110.1030SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jun 28 1996 14:0611
    
    	Everything I read or heard about Antoine Walker has been positive.
    At the Chicago pre-draft camp he measured 6-10, yet was listed as
    6-8 by Kentucky, Walker says he grew a little last season and is 6-9.
    He can play SF or PF and plays defense, he has above average passing
    skills for a big man. He will turn 20 on August 12th, was a member
    of 3 Chicago, Boston Shootout teams. The only negative is that he
    shot 71% from the free throw line his freshman year, then dropped to
    66% last year.
    
    Ron
110.1031MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Jun 28 1996 15:025
    
    ESPN's Clark Kellogg chimes in as another who thinks that in a few
    years Antoine Walker will turn out to be the best player in this
    year's draft. 
     
110.1032ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 28 1996 15:283
    
    So the Celtics will have a team with one player on it... because they
    got no one else
110.1033When the bulls RUNONTOP ends Up hope the Celts are thereTPSYS::BROOKSFri Jun 28 1996 15:3114
    Last years 1st round pick will do ok and Fox appearently doesn't 
    stink.  SO those 3 plus next years 2 1st round picks and say a 
    free agent of 2 and you have a team... :-).
    
    Hey remember you only need 1 player right, the rest can all be
    throw in's (IE MJ)...
    
    BTW Do the celtics have any $$$ Under the Cap this year ? IF not will
    they next year ???  I know Stern may not allow folks to sign if the
    CBA(?) is not signed by July 1st but will folks still be able to 
    declare themselves as free agents ?  Where is all the celts $$$ tied
    up ?
    
    								MairB
110.1034Four guys get big bucksTNPUBS::NAZZAROAin't no one gonna dog me downFri Jun 28 1996 15:419
    Radja gets $5 million a year for four more years.
    Fox gets $1.75 to $2.5 million for four more years.
    Brown gets $2.8 to $3.5 million for four more years.
    Barros gets $2.2 to $3.2 million for five more years.
    
    There are outs for the players in most of these contracts.  Everyone
    else is getting short money or is a free agent.
    
    NAZZ
110.1035TPSYS::BROOKSFri Jun 28 1996 15:433
    So what do they have to offer on the Free Agent Market ?  Didnt I hear
    that Barros would be a free agent this year ?
    
110.1036If there's nae abuse, there's nae SPROTS...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri Jun 28 1996 15:519
    
> You guys amaze me sometimes.  You really do.
    
    Well!  Good to see that some of us can stand above the fray... 
    
    ;-)
    
    glenn
    
110.1037Early look at the 1996-97 rosterTNPUBS::NAZZAROAin't no one gonna dog me downFri Jun 28 1996 15:5817
    Celts have to decide whether or not to exercise the option on Greg
    Mijnor's contract at $1.5 million - don't know why they wouldn't.  Todd
    Day has a year left on his deal, but he'll be lucky to make the team. 
    They'll probably keep Alton Lister just to practice with Steve Hamer.
    Fat boy Hamilton is history.
    
    C - Ellison, Lister, Hamer
    PF - Radja
    SF - Walker, Williams, Fox
    SG - Minor, Brown
    PG - Wesley, Barros
    
    Doug Smith and Junior Burrough - see ya.
    
    12th man could be a free agent.  Celts are $4 million under the cap.
    
    NAZZ
110.1038IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Jun 28 1996 16:003
>    They'll probably keep Alton Lister just to practice with Steve Hamer.

I've heard from multiple places that Lister retired.  N'est-ce pas?
110.1039While the ncaa sleptMKOTS3::BREENFri Jun 28 1996 20:4518
    >You guys amaze me sometimes.  You really do.
    
    Frank, I thought you pointed out to me a week ago that nothing should
    ever amaze a Sprots reader.
    
    Personally I'd take Minor over Day.  I think M.L. is going to do the
    opposite.
    
    Didn't I get some flak about my putting top ncaa basketball on a near
    par with the nba and now folks are looking at this one guy to radically
    change the Celtics?  Bulpett appears correct in saying that the '97
    pick could have been swapped for Camby.  I would have done that.
    
    But the choice they made is not a bad alternative.  Perhaps there's a
    15 year old that can be double promoted out of high school and into the
    nba.  Ncaa basketball which is a big business should be coming up with
    a strategy for when the big tv contract runs out though that's still
    several years off and explains their torpitude on the issue.
110.1040CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Jul 01 1996 12:239
>    Frank, I thought you pointed out to me a week ago that nothing should
>    ever amaze a Sprots reader.
    
Yes, but I was writing that with my "Simple Man, Not SPORTS Reader" hat on.


8^)


110.1041Lister could really help the teamTNPUBS::NAZZAROAin't no one gonna dog me downMon Jul 01 1996 14:385
    As far as I know, Lister is not retired, but is a free agent.  I think
    they can sign him for short money, and he'd be a good backup for
    Ellison and an excellent teacher for Hamer.
    
    NAZZ
110.1042KC is backPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Jul 01 1996 23:234
110.1043maybe???BSS::MENDEZTue Jul 09 1996 18:362
    Is that true?? I thought KC JOnes went to charlotte with Cowens???
    
110.1044diff'rent JonesHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jul 09 1996 18:396
He was interviewed and some thought that he was penciled in but alas and
alack, it seems he wanted the retirement package that Boston offered.

Bobby Jones is still in town and available, though.

TTom
110.1045BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredTue Oct 29 1996 12:3110
110.1046I'm really pissed off about this, so I posted it here, tooTNPUBS::NAZZAROBC - the next Holy CrossMon Nov 25 1996 13:3228
110.1047CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Nov 25 1996 13:527
110.1048PHXSS1::HEISERR.I.O.T.Mon Nov 25 1996 14:424
110.1049CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westMon Nov 25 1996 14:4533