[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hbahba::cam_sports

Title:Sports 93-96 Archive. No new notes allowed
Notice:Chainsaw's last standSPORTS_97
Moderator:HBAHBA::HAAS
Created:Mon Jan 11 1993
Last Modified:Tue Apr 15 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:302
Total number of notes:117855

77.0. "Official UMASS Athletics Note" by GIAMEM::SCHOTT () Wed Jan 20 1993 11:32

         This topic is reserved for discussion of men's and women's
    athletics at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.  (and to
    tone down some of the Big East zealots who lurk in this file ;^))
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
77.1GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Jan 20 1993 11:352
         Last night's results, UMASS 84 URI 72.  UMASS now stands at 9 and
    4, going into Thursday's rematch with Temple.
77.2UMass destroys a solid URI team; how'd BC do last night?TNPUBS::NAZZAROWhy won't BC play UMass?Thu Jan 21 1993 18:5712
    TREMENDOUS first half by the Minutemen, who stormed out to a 24
    point lead at halftime!  They seem to be adjusting better to life
    without Harper.  Impressive tenacious defense allowed URI no open
    shots for the last ten minutes of the half.  Kellogg had a nice game
    at the point, Malloy rebounded as well as scored, Mike WIlliams was
    exciting at both ends of the court.  An excellent win.
    
    UMass grad and current URI coach Al Skinner has never won a game
    as a coach in the Cage, and since it's closing next month, never
    will!
    
    NAZZ
77.3CUPMK::DEVLINLou Gorman & da Master PlanFri Jan 22 1993 11:375
This is day 5 of me waiting for Nazz or ACCrock to show me where all them
Atlantic 10 teams in da top 25 are.  After all, if its such a superior
conference, it must have at *least* 3 teams in da top 25

JD
77.4day 5 for U; week 12 for *us*.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 22 1993 12:018
    re: .3 (JD)
    
    I'll show you after you answer NAZZ's legitimate question:
    
    "Why won't BC play UMass?"
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.5METSNY::francusA blow for Freedom of Speech - no more gag ruleFri Jan 22 1993 12:067
re: .4

Obfuscating again! JD's question is easily answered by any Objective sports
analyst. Your question requires contact with the 2 schools - not
at all comparable.

The Crazy Met
77.6CUPMK::DEVLINLou Gorman & da Master PlanFri Jan 22 1993 12:3511
Accrock -

I loathe BC.  If you remember past renditions, I used to ask why BC stopped
playing Northeastern during the Reggie Lewis years.  

I axed my question about the Altantic 10 a few weeks ago, but got no response
either.

Again, please help me locate an Atlantic 10 team in da top 25.  

JD
77.7GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Jan 22 1993 15:1312
         Nope, I can't find an A-10 team in the AP Top 25.  Of course
    they have their opinion of how the top teams stack up against one
    another.  As does USA Today/CNN, as does Jeff Sangarin, as does the
    RPI ratings.  (you may be surprised how the latter two computer 
    services rank the two leagues)
    
         Seems to me that a lot of folks put a lot of stock in the head
    to head matchups in the BE-ACC Challenge of a few years back, when
    debating the merits of those leagues.  Anyone care to harbor a guess
    on how the A-10 has fared in games against BE teams over the last 
    couple of years?
                    
77.9BE used to be compared w/ ACC & B10. Now it's the A10 ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 22 1993 15:2928
    re: JD
    
    The A10 might not be better than the BE, but it ain't a whole lot
    worse, either.  The fact that we're even arguing about this proves just
    how far the BE has fallen.
    
    
    re: .8
    
    > People is always tellin' ACChris (sp)
    
    That's "ACC Chris" fella.  Pronounced your way would be "ACC HRIS", and
    that just doesn't make sense.  HTH.
    
    BTW, a Top25 ranking is most definitely important if for no other
    reason than it helps define where you'll be seeded come tourney time. 
    A bad seed goes a long way in determining how quickly a team is gonna
    exit-stage right.
    
    Speaking of seeds, a good 'un is even more important this year than
    normally.  Most folks seem to agree that there's an upper-echelon of
    six (6) teams (Indiana, Michigan, Duke, Kaintucky, UNC, & Kansas).  Two
    (2) of these teams will NOT have to play any of other 4 prior to the
    Final4.  So, ... being ranked 1 or 2 at season-end could be VERY, VERY
    important.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.10MSBCS::BRYDIEKeep the home fries burningFri Jan 22 1993 15:344
    
     Well Acchris, last I heard the tourney committee weren't not using the
    January USA Today rankings to determine seedings. Of course, thangs
    could have changed.
77.11AP,UPI,USAToday,Sagarin - reflections of what will be ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 22 1993 15:367
    Obviously the point isn't which rankings get used.  The committee ends
    up developing their own.  What does matter is that you're ranked closer
    to the top of that ranking than the bottom, otherwise you're gonna be
    gone but_quick.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.12CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeFri Jan 22 1993 16:3921
    
>>    Speaking of seeds, a good 'un is even more important this year than
>>    normally.  Most folks seem to agree that there's an upper-echelon of
                 ^^^^
    <set mode = Missouri - Da "Show Me" State>
    
    		Please provide dastistical proof to validate the selection
    of the word "most".
    
    Thank you
    Doubtin' Thom
    
    
>>    six (6) teams (Indiana, Michigan, Duke, Kaintucky, UNC, & Kansas).  Two
>>    (2) of these teams will NOT have to play any of other 4 prior to the
>>    Final4.  So, ... being ranked 1 or 2 at season-end could be VERY, VERY
>>    important.
    
    
  
      - ACC Chris
77.13double edged swordMETSNY::francusGotta love Freedom of SpeechFri Jan 22 1993 16:436
Kev,

I gotta agree with ACC Chris on those 6. Course it will be that much more
painful when UNC gets knocked out of the tournament in an early round.

The Crazy Met
77.14GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Jan 22 1993 17:5911
         UMASS played yet another of their frustratingly inconsistent
    games last night, and narrowly escaped with a 52-50 win over Temple at
    the Cage.  Temple's matchup zone and slowdown offense and a woeful
    shooting night (1-13 from 3 pt. land, 25% FT) by UMASS, contributed
    to another ugly UMASS-Temple confrontation.  The only good news other
    than UMASS advancing to 10 and 4, was the return of Harper Williams,
    who checked back in with 17 points and 11 rebounds.
    
         Next up, Depaul at the Centrum!
    
    Russ
77.152=most??????CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeFri Jan 22 1993 18:511
    
77.16Hockey Coach ?CSLALL::WHITEMon Jan 25 1993 13:306
    Can anyone confirm the rumor of Minnesota Gophers assistant coach
    Mark Mazzoleni being offered the UMASS hockey coach position ?
    
    UMass is tentatively sceduled to begin play nexted season.
    
    Dave
77.17GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Jan 28 1993 11:230
77.18CagePMRV70::HEIERThu Jan 28 1993 13:406
    There is a great article in todays Boston Globe about the 
    history of the Cage - The last game in that building is Friday
    @ midnite.
    
    Who else went to the game on Sunday.  UMASS sure looked sluggish
    and could have easily lost if not for some clutch play by Loe Roe.
77.19Hope the Cage gets a proper farewell with a UMass winTNPUBS::NAZZAROPats - Parade in January 19??Fri Jan 29 1993 17:517
    MIDNIGHT MADNESS - TONIGHT THE LAST GAME AT THE CAGE!!!!!
    
    A lot of great memories associated with that old dump, but it sure 
    will be nice to step into a state of the art facility like the Mullins
    Center - which I will do a week from tomorrow to see UMass vs Rutgers.
    
    NAZZ
77.20CSC32::M_MACGREGORFri Jan 29 1993 23:435
    
    Could someone from that area send me the article about the cage?
    
    Marc
    
77.21CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeSat Jan 30 1993 13:598
    Marc, 
    
    send me mail, I'll send ya the Woostah paper's version too.
    
    I remain,
    a occasional reporter becoming a post office worker?
    Kev
    
77.22ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Sat Jan 30 1993 21:224
    Marc, send me you mail-stop or home address.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.23Another winPMRV70::HEIERMon Feb 01 1993 12:217
    UMASS beat St. Bonaventure by 15..I believe it was 93-78...On
    to Mullins and a game vs West Virigina on ESPN @ 9pm Thursday.
    The CNN rankings have them just after G'town @ 26.  I still don't
    understand how the rankings have BC 5 spots behind G'town provided that
    they beat them twice this season...
    
    Larry
77.24UMASS RecruitGIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Feb 04 1993 14:5815
         I took in the Thayer Academy - Lawrence Academy b-ball game 
    yesterday, so as to get a look-see at UMASS recruit Carmelo Traveiso,
    a 6'3" SG originally from Dorchester, Ma.  While I admit the ISL
    is not exactly the equivalent of the NYC Catholic League, nonetheless
    Mr. Traveiso put on a pretty good show.  35 points in a 64-45, Thayer
    victory, 7 out of 10 from 3 point land, and not rinky-dink 20' treys
    either, but honest to goodness 23'+ NBA three pointers!!  According to
    the parent of one of the Thayer players, Traveiso is shooting "about
    60% on his three-pointers, this season".
    
         While the jury is out on his ball-handling and quickness, there
    is no question in my mind that he is a major league shooter!
    
    Russ
                                          
77.25GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Feb 12 1993 12:2420
         A very solid win last night on the road, for UMASS, against 
    a good St.Joe's team, 81-69.  UMASS now has a two game lead in the
    A-10 standings, and a 16 and 4 overall record.  St.Joe's falls to 
    14 and 6.  According to the Globe, the keys to the victory for UMASS
    were dominating the boards, and tough perimeter defense on St.Joe's 
    excellent backcourt duo of Benard Blunt and Rap Curry.  Blunt was
    held to a 6 for 19 shooting night.
    
         UMASS must now turn right around within less than 48 hours,
    and play George Washington in their building.  It will be interesting
    to see how Harper Williams fares at 6'7" matching up against one of
    the top freshmen in the land, GWU's 7'1" Yinka Dare.
    
         Following GWU, UMASS has Buffalo, URI, and West Virginia,
    consecutively on the road, and then finishes the season at the Mullins
    Center against St. Bonaventure and St. Joseph's.  Another 20 win
    season is within reach with a strong finish!
    
    Russ
                  
77.26MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Peter Principle in actionTue Feb 16 1993 18:4019
     My name is Tommy and I'm a bandwagon jumper. I admit that I didn't 
    root for my state university when they were 4 and 21 and the only 
    thing less aesthetically appealing than a UMass basketball game was
    naked pictures of Estelle Getty. Yes, I never cheered for them when
    the Sweet Sixteen was the team groupie. I admit it and I'm ashamed.
    I'm ashamed that even though the school is fifty miles away and be-
    fore this year, Cameroonian skiers got more air time, I never watched
    them play. And now that they're successful, now that they're the best
    college team in the state and now that they're entertaining, and now
    that they even play on national tv, I watch 'em and I root for 'em. Yes, 
    I root for 'em. I realize I don't deserve to because I wasn't there for 
    'em in the lean years, the PC years (Pre-Calipari). I realize that when
    the Tenn. College of Pharmacy was kicking their ass, I should have been
    in the Minutemen's corner, but I was out on some other local school's 
    bandwagon then because that's the kind of slut that I am. I always cheer 
    for my local teams and athletes, especially when they do well, and I could-
    n't be more ashamed.
    
77.27Next Up: He's a URI fan, a Rutgers fan, a GWU fan, a .....RHETT::KNORRACC &gt; B10Tue Feb 16 1993 19:207
    Must feel good to get that off yer chest.  Unfortunately it sickens me
    almost as bad as that rough ferry ride from Nantucket did a few years
    ago.  (The one where I watched the young, the old, the beautiful, and
    the ugly RALPH breakfast over the side of the boat.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.28put it on the table....don't flinchCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Feb 16 1993 19:559
    
    Alright Tommie, we'll just have somebody whack yer pee pee!
    
    Hawk?  you around?
    
    I remain,
    sure the punishment will fit the crime!
    Kev
    
77.29DECWET::METZGERZeros and Ones....Tue Feb 16 1993 20:304
Welcome Brother Tommy...


77.30MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Peter Principle in actionWed Feb 17 1993 11:215
   >> -< Next Up: He's a URI fan, a Rutgers fan, a GWU fan, a ..... >-
    
      Ack Chris, I said I root for LOCAL teams and athletes. I didn't
      say I adopt a half assed program from a university I never attended,
      in a state I don't live in.
77.31AXIS::ROBICHAUDHOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknightWed Feb 17 1993 16:104
    	That's okay Tommy, for you see I too have a "UMASS" problem,
    but with the proper help we can overcome this together.
    
    				/Don
77.32CAM3::WAYJ. Edgar -- G-man wearin' a G-stringWed Feb 17 1993 16:2816
>    	That's okay Tommy, for you see I too have a "UMASS" problem,
>    but with the proper help we can overcome this together.
    
I went to Junk Noter's Anonymous one time.  That helped me.

Perhaps there's a 12-Step Program that can help you.


Remember,

	You're good enough.
	You're smart enough.
	And, doggone it, we like you!


'Saw
77.33GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Feb 22 1993 15:3618
         Foul trouble (by H. Williams and Roe) and some shakey free throw 
    shooting down the stretch resulted in a three point loss to URI, 71-68,
    at the Providence Civic Center on Saturday.  UMASS had a one point lead
    and the ball with 30 seconds to go, but turned it over, and then missed
    the front end of a one and one, and that was all she wrote.  During
    their 12 game winning streak, UMASS won 4 of those games by 5 points
    or less, so the law of averages was bound to catch up with them.
    
         In his post game interview, Calipari was very complimentary
    towards URI, and not all that disappointed about the close loss.  He
    feels that the loss may be good for the team, and cause them to refocus
    on the three remaining league games and then the A-10 Tournament.
    
    Russ
    
    - Three technicals were called on UMASS, and URI hit all six free
      throws awarded! 
      
77.34Ugly Loss to WVU!!!GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Mar 01 1993 11:3621
         For those of you who missed it (wish I did), the UM'ies were
    reamed, steamed and dry-cleaned in Morgantown, WV, by the Mountaineers
    on Saturday, to the tune of a 79-54 drubbing.  After an uninspired
    first half, which saw UMASS take a 2 point lead into the locker room,
    WVU came out in the second half and shot in the 60% range, while UMASS 
    couldn't throw the ball in the ocean from the beach!
    
         For UMASS, Mike Williams, their one and only creative guard, went
    down with an injury in the first half, and Jerome Malloy, normally a
    12 ppg scorer, continued in a major league slump, going for the goose
    egg.  Teams have figured out to get right in Malloy's face at the three
    point arc, and have taken him right out of his game, as he's pretty
    much a one dimensional player ... bomb from long range or else.
    
         UMASS remains pretty much a lock for the big dance, probably
    as about an seventh or eighth seed or so, but given the way they are
    playing, I forsee an early exit.  This team really misses Will
    Herndon's athleticism, and McCoy and Brown's outside shooting!
    
    Russ
        
77.35CUPMK::DEVLINPaying for Reagan/Bush yearsMon Mar 01 1993 11:568
Callin Nazz,  Calling Nazz.  So, Nazz, is UMASS still better
than any Big East team, and is the A10 still better?

Haw Haw Haw.

Umass Theme Song "They call me the Great Pretender..."

JD
77.36SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Mar 01 1993 17:0915
    
    
    	To be fair, Morgan-hole (i.e. Morgantown, W.VA.) is not a real
    hospital place to play.  I've been to a few games down there and
    the fans are as rabid as anywhere.  
    
    	So, WVU has the ability to pull off an upset.  Although I'm still
    not in UMASS's camp, they should get an invite to the dance.  But
    just wait till nexted year...just remember the name Edgar Padilla.
    He's in Puerto Rico right now instead of playing for Central HS here
    in Springfield, and if he would have stuck around for his senior year,
    he would have been the Mass state player of the year.
    
    bill..g.
    
77.37been there; a hole to be sureHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortMon Mar 01 1993 17:3711
>    	To be fair, Morgan-hole (i.e. Morgantown, W.VA.) is not a real
>    hospital place to play.  I've been to a few games down there and
>    the fans are as rabid as anywhere.  

Can't let this one slide. There is most definitely a real hospital in
Morgan-hole, which is definitely a real hole. Rabid or not, hospitable or
not, UMass failed to show up, pure and simple.

To the Mountaineers credit, they carped the diem, fer sure.

TTom
77.38CAMONE::WAYWake up Mama, turn your lamp down lowMon Mar 01 1993 17:458
>To the Mountaineers credit, they carped the diem, fer sure.

I heard the coach was buyin' them all news sets of false-teef to celebrate
the victory......


[sorry, couldn't resist]
'Saw
77.39GIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Mar 02 1993 11:3019
         UMASS clinched the regular season A-10 Title last night in 
    Amherst with a 86-62 win over St.Bonaventure.  The UM'ies will wrap
    up the season on Thursday night with a game at home versus St.Joe's,
    and then will meet 8th seeded St. Bonaventure in the first round of
    the A-10 Tournament at the Palestra on Sunday.
    
         In the bad news department, guard Mike Williams broke his hand
    in the game with West Virginia on Saturday, and will be lost for any
    post season action.  This is a significant loss, as Williams averaged
    12 ppg in a sixth man role, and was UMASS' best transition player.
    UMASS has had trouble scoring points all season (rebounding and defense
    has been their strengths), so the loss of Williams will only compound
    their offensive deficiencies.  
    
         Coincidentally, Mike Williams is the third UMASS player to break a 
    hand this season.
    
    Russ
        
77.40SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Mar 02 1993 13:329
    
    re: TTom
    
    	Thanks for the correction.  Usually I check over what I write, but
    this time I didn't and when I read the note as entered, I had a feeling
    I was going to hear about it.
    
    bill..g.
    
77.41Signs of a good conference: depth, talented teams, and exciting gamesTNPUBS::NAZZAROI want a real adventure!Wed Mar 03 1993 18:1726
    Calipari hopes to have Williams back in time for the first round
    of the NCAAs, but he's definitely out for the A10 tourney, which 
    starts Sunday.  Several big contests in the league tomorrow night
    determine seeding for the first two rounds at the Palestra.  There
    are two very hot teams right now who I wouldn't want to play early:
    Temple (especially at the Palestra) and West Virginia.  Here's the
    conference standings going into the final regular season games
    tomorrow:
    
    	1. UMass	10-3    19-6
    	2. St. Joe's	 8-5	17-8
    	3. GW		 8-5	19-6
    	4. Temple	 7-6	14-11
    	5. URI		 7-6	16-9
    	6. West Va. 	 6-7	15-10
    	7. Rutgers	 6-7	13-13
    	8. St. Bona	 0-13	10-15
    
    George Washington plays at URI, Rutgers is at Temple, St. Joe's is
    at Umass, and West Virginia is at St. Bonaventure.  It is reasonable 
    to assume UMass, West Virginia, and Temple will win.  If URI beats
    GW, there would be a four way tie for second place!  If GW wins, they
    clinch second, St. Joe's and Temple tie for third, and URI and W Va
    tie for fifth.  So as you can see, it's wide open in the A10!
    
    NAZZ
77.42UMASS on to the A-10 FinalGIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Mar 09 1993 12:3930
         UMASS advanced to the A-10 Tournament Finals, to be played in
    Amherst on Thursday evening against Temple, with a dominant performance
    in the semi's over URI, in a game that wasn't as close as the 76-50
    final score!  UMASS shot the ball poorly throughout, and their final
    shooting percentage of around 40% was bolstered by numerous fast break
    layups.  HOWEVER they owned the boards, outrebounding URI by a 53-24
    margin, they picked up nearly every loose ball, and defensed URI into
    a 33% shooting performance.  Soph Lou Roe was a monster, scoring 24
    points and grabbing 10+ boards!
    
         The game became very chippy near the end as the large group of
    UMASS fans at the Palestra taunted the URI contigent and team with
    chants of "NIT", "NIT".  One particular ugly moment came when URI's
    best player, Abdul Fox, while passing Lou Roe in working off a pick, 
    wound up a bolo punch, and caught Roe roughly 6" below the navel, 
    if you know what I mean.  Roe collapsed to the floor and later had to 
    be helped to the bench, but looked fully recovered by games end.
    Luckily for Fox, the game was well in hand, and Calipari didn't 
    return Roe to the game, as Roe probably outweighs Fox by 30 pounds!
    
         Temple comes to the Mullins Center on Thursday evening for the
    Championship, playing their best ball of the season.  I look for Harper
    Williams to have a big game as he was passed over for the A-10 POTY
    Award (awarded instead to Temple's Aaron McKie), in a somewhat 
    surprising decision.  Temple's zone has frustrated UMASS in year's
    gone by, and given this club's inconsistent shooting, well, it
    should be a very competitive game!
    
    Russ
    
77.43BOXTOP::BRYDIEThe Peter Principle in actionTue Mar 09 1993 13:369
    >> The game became very chippy near the end as the large group of
    >> UMASS fans at the Palestra taunted the URI contigent and team with
    >> chants of "NIT", "NIT".  
    
       In part, this was in response to what went down at the Providence
       Civic Center last month when these two teams met. During the game 
       and after the URI players and fans were talking a lot of trash and
       this was the payback for that.    
    
77.44UMASS vs. Temple should be a helluva game!AXIS::ROBICHAUDD-FENSTue Mar 09 1993 15:011
    
77.45UMASS 69 Temple 61GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Mar 12 1993 16:1829
         The voice is hoarse, I have a serious case of eye baggage, and by
    3 p.m. today I'll be even more of a basket case (pulled into the
    driveway at 1:15 a.m.) but it was worth it, as Nazz, his son Joey
    and I watched a good college basketball game, for the A-10
    Championship in Amherst last night.  The game had just about
    everything, momentum swings, good individual performances, killer "D"
    and an absolutely ELECTRIC atmosphere, especially in the 2nd half
    when UMASS made their run.
    
         For a UMASS-Temple showdown, the game was an artistic masterpiece,
    as I was fully expecting a 48-45 UG-LY.  For Temple, Eddie Jones and
    Salem, Ma. native Eric Brunson stood out.  UMASS effectively shut down
    A-10 POTY Aaron McKie in the second half, which in my opinion was a big
    key to the game.  For UMASS, Jerome Malloy (4 for 7 - 3 pt'ers), Lou
    Roe (10 pts., 14 rebs.) and Harper Williams (20 pts, 8 rebs) came up
    big.  Harper in particular went into his "will not be denied" routine
    in the second half and cemented his Tournament MVP position.
    
         It will be interesting to see how UMASS gets seeded for the NCAA
    Tournament.  Some of the speculation on the radio last night and in
    USA Today has UMASS going to Winston-Salem, NC, as a no. 4 seed in
    the East (and sets up a potential matchup with UNC).  Given last year's
    controversy regarding UMASS' "home court advantage" in Worcester, I
    wouldn't be surprised to see UMASS sent to one of the other Regionals,
    though I would think that banishment to Tobacco Road would be
    punishment enough for a New England school ;^)!!
    
    Russ
     
77.46PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Mon Mar 15 1993 00:1910
77.47when you wish upon a star??ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Mar 15 1993 03:525
    It will be a true pleasure to see Penn beat UMass. Unlikely, but it
    would prove how good the Atlantic 10 is - hah!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.48Temple plays the iron!!GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Mar 15 1993 13:5032
         I was spinning the AM Radio dial after the NCAA Selection show
    last night, and picked up a talk show (not sure which one) where a
    caller was questioning how Temple at 17 and 12 could be a No. 7 seed,
    and Providence with a similar record was left out (a typical Big East
    Moonie ;^)!)  Well the consensus of the B-ball pundits out there is
    that its a tossup whether Michigan or Temple played the toughest 
    schedule this year.  
    
         Temple's non league schedule is as follows:
    
                      BC               NIT-bound
                      Lasalle
                      Florida          NIT
                      Fla. St.         NCAA #3
                      Penn St.
                      Cincinnati       NCAA #2
                      Penn.            NCAA #14
                      Kan. St.         NCAA #6
                      UAB              NIT
                      Wake Forest      NCAA #5
                      Tulane           NCAA #11
                      Memphis St.      NCAA #10    .......... plus,
    
                      UMASS (3)        NCAA #3
                      URI   (2)        NCAA #8
                      GWU   (3)        NCAA #12
                      WVU   (2)        NIT
                      St. Joe's (2)    NIT
    
         Not a St.Leo's or Wagner in the bunch!
    
    Russ
77.49UVa should be expected to beat UMass.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Mar 16 1993 14:148
    Hate to burst any bubbles around here, but does anyone *really* believe
    UMass will be favored to beat Virginia in Round 2?
    
    Not saying they can't do it, but IMHO they should be considered a 'Dog
    when battling the Cavaliers.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.50GIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Mar 16 1993 15:1014
         C'mon Chris, those rose-colored ACC glasses are blinding you,
    my man.  Where did UVA finish in the ACC this year, 6th or there
    abouts?  Surely you recall UMASS' Excellent Loss (ACC Tm) in their
    first game against FSU on FSU's home court?  A game in which the UM'ies
    were ahead in the 2nd half, and clanged a trey at the end which would
    have put the game into OT!
    
         Any responsible bookie, would favor UMASS by 2, UVA's Tobacco
    Road "homecourt" advantage notwithstanding.
    
         Actually it's Penn that I'm worried about.
    
    A10Russ
           
77.51GIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Mar 16 1993 15:5241
    RE:  "UVA's "Tobacco Road" homecourt advantage notwithstanding"
    
    The top 10 reasons for Russ's faux pas, confusing Syracuse, N.Y.
    and Winston-Salem, N.C., in Note 77.50:
    
    No. 10   Lightheaded from all the snowshoveling.
    
    No. 9    Was a business major in college and never took a geography
             course.
    
    No. 8    Worcester, Syracuse, Winston-Salem, .... you've seen one 200,000
             person, 2nd tier U.S. city, you've seen them all.
    
    No. 7    Deep in his heart, he really believes UMASS should be a No. 4
             seed and hence in Winston-Salem.
    
    No. 6    Really wanted to use "Tobacco Road" in 77.50.
    
    No. 5    Is a closet Holy Cross fan, and they are the ones in Winston-
             Salem.
    
    No. 4    ACC Chris gets him so ticked off at times, he says irrational
             things.
    
    No. 3    Has a secret stash of Sportshrooms (tm) in his bottom drawer
             at work.
    
    No. 2    Has a male hormonal imbalance brought on by the onset of
             March Madness.
    
    and the number 1 reason for his faux pas in 77.50:
    
    No. 1   He really doesn't know what he's talking about, but
            occasionally can fake it.
         
    
    Since UMASS will have the "Northern Yankee" homecourt advantage, any
    responsible bookie will favor them by 3!!!
    
    
    Russ
77.52U Va will have trouble winning its 1st round gameTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 2-time A10 Champ!Tue Mar 16 1993 18:206
    Great "Top Ten" list, Russ!!!
    
    Actually, I'm worried how the Minutemen will fare Sunday vs the
    Jaspers of Manhattan.
    
    NAZZ         
77.53METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Mar 16 1993 19:133
It would be GRRREAT if Penn beat UMass.

The Crazy Met
77.54Luved that Top 10 list though!RHETT::KNORRDECwindows Support, US/CSCTue Mar 16 1993 19:2011
    I'll grant you UMass's Excellent Loss to FSU grants you and all Hourmen
    comfort, like my 2-year old who grabs his pacifier at the slightest
    hint of trouble, but the reality is that loss was while the Seminoles
    were struggling without Charlie Ward.  With Ward the northerners 
    would've been starring at_a Wake@Temple 30+ point masacre, FSU's inability 
    to hold a lead notwithstanding.  Heh heh!
    
    Sorry folks, but I like Virginia in the Sweet 16 fer sure.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.55PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 16 1993 19:561
    I guess ACChris has jumped off the A10 bandwagon.  At least for now...
77.56Remember 1979 @SLC :-)PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Wed Mar 17 1993 02:3135
Nazz,  you're not treating Penn with the proper respect, so I figure it's my
job to teach you some :-).

Penn went undefeated in the Ivy League this season, only the sixth time that
was done since the formation of the league.  They had more wins this season
than the 1978-1979 team that went to the final four at Salt Lake City (I'm
probably in the minority of people who remember that as the year Penn got their
clocks cleaned by Michigan State and not as the Bird-Magic matchup).  Their
starting five are:

F Barry Pierce (6-4 Jr., 14.5 ppg, 5.7 rpg)
F Shawn Trice (6-8 So., 6.2 ppg, 4.7 rpg)
C Eric Moore (6-7 So., 7.0 ppg, 6.7 rpg)
G Matt Maloney (6-3 So., 16.5 ppg, 3.2 rpg)
G Jerome Allen (6-4 So., 13.2 ppg, 4.7 rpg)

They are one of the best three-point shooting teams in the country, hitting 40%
as a team, 12th in the country.  Maloney hit 88 of 195 (45.1%) and was ranked
9th in the nation in 3-pointers per game with 3.5.  Allen hit 49-124 (39.5%).

Penn's offense is 12th in the nation, with a 40.7% FG%.  Anyone tuning in
looking for a Princeton-like team will be disappointed.  This is a great
man-to-man team.  And they've got some very strong momentum, having won 12 in a
row and 16 of their last 18.

The problems are obvious.  Four of the starters are sophomores and the fifth is
a junior.  They're too small in the middle.  And they tend to lost interest
when they have a big lead (though I suspect this won't be so much of a problem
against UMass).

The Minutemen should definitely not make the mistake of looking past this game. 
They should be able to wear them down and beat them down the stretch, but they
don't want to get caught sleeping.

j.
77.57URI vs. UNC? It could happen!RHETT::KNORRDECwindows Support, US/CSCWed Mar 17 1993 11:289
    re: Mac
    
    Was never ever on the A10 bandwagon.  Only point I've ever made in my
    unyielding attempt to access The Truth is that A10 > BigLeast.
    
    HTH,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.58AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingWed Mar 17 1993 14:414
77.59METSNY::francusMets in '93Wed Mar 17 1993 18:0916
I rmember that 1978-79 season well. St. John and Penn were 39th and 40th in
the rankings of teams in the NCAA and they played each other to get
to the final 4.

Princeton 2 years ago went undefeated in the Ivy League.
Penn's last game this year was a 1 point win over Princeton in
Princeton, a great game from start to finish.


I disagree with Jeff on one point. If UMass really comes out and takes
the game seriously then Penn could get blown out early. Next year Penn
could be good enough to get into the top 25 - ala Princeton early in the
1990-1991 season; of course Princeton then got blown away by UNLV, but so
did everyone that year until the Final 4.

The Crazy Met
77.60PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Wed Mar 17 1993 20:506
No disagreements here, TCM.  It's pretty likely that Penn will get their
clocks cleaned as long as UMass is ready.  The matchups are just too strong
for the Quakers.  But that won't stop me from taking the day off to watch
it anyway (shhh, don't tell Dale :-) ).

j.
77.61GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Mar 22 1993 13:410
77.62GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Mar 22 1993 13:490
77.63GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Mar 22 1993 13:510
77.64Third try the charm!GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Mar 22 1993 16:0224
         Sorry folks, our system is working a bit on the funky side
    today.
    
         I only wanted to comment on Calipari's substitution scheme late
    in the game.  First he sits down Harper Williams with three minutes
    to go and UVA up by 14, because Williams doesn't dive after a loose
    ball.  The guy is a four year starter, has averaged 14 pts./8 rebs/
    game over his career, has led his team to 90+ wins over that period,
    and all the while playing center at 6'7", 220 lbs., against the 
    Jamal Mashburns and Yinka Dare's of the world.  He's won an A-10
    POTY award and two A-10 Tourney MVP awards.  The guy personifies the
    words "heart" and "over-achiever".  And he broke his hand earlier in
    the season diving for a loose ball DURING PRACTICE!  I think Coach
    Cal blew it big time by benching Harper Williams in his last college
    game.
    
         Secondly, during the last minute, down by 15, I can't understand
    why he didn't clear the bench.  UMASS has several walkons on the team
    this season, who likely won't be back next year with the large group
    of recruits coming in.  I'm sure they would remember for the rest of
    their lives the thrill of playing in the NCAA Tourney, even if it was
    only garbage time.
    
    Russ 
77.651988 WS game 5METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Mar 22 1993 16:118
Classiest example I saw of a coach/manager putting players into a game was
Tony LaRussa in game 5 of the 1988 World Series. Dodgers led by a bunch; 
Hershiser was pitching and it was top of the 9th. LaRussa made a few pitching
changes in the 9th when there was no real threat so that all the A's who
were on the WS roster got a chance to play in a WS game.

The Crazy Met
 
77.66My Thoughts...ESKIMO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Mar 22 1993 20:2439
      Hi,
    
        As a UMass alumni, all I can say is bummer about the loss.
    
        I only got to see bits and pieces of the game because I had
        to take my mother in law to lunch (unbelievable!).
    
        But, anyway, my thoughts...
    
        They missed shots by such a large margin in the first half 
        that if they were just standing in a gym shooting, not one
        in a hundred would be off by that much.  In other words, it 
        was all _mental_.  If there's one thing I hate its when the
        team is tight.  man, did they look tight!
    
        I don't understand why UMass doesn't shoot better.  It seems
        to be too psychological.  Like this aspect of performance is
        something UMass sometimes suffers from to a large extent.  I 
        mean how could their shots have been that far off?  And Kellog...
        man does he epitomize the extreme opposite of looking for the
        shot.  That's one thing I like about Williams.  He LOOKS for
        the shot.  Speaking of psychological, its hard to explain Barbee.
        So poor shooting in the 1st half, but so good in the second.
        (???)
    
        The only other thing I thought was that UMass probably had three
        glaring weaknesses.  One, they do not have a big center.  Two,
        they do not seem to ballhandle well.  Three, they don't shoot
        well.  That's a lot of shortcomings and of course in every other
        facet of the game, they are probably superb.
    
        For the next couple years.  Man, if they can recruit a big 'big
        man' and simply learn to not be tight and take a few hundred 
        shots a day.  I don't know...they ought to be alright what with
        the guys coming back + Donta Bright + the recruits.
    
         Oh well...
    
                                                        Tony
77.67Mebbe nexted yearCTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyTue Mar 23 1993 15:298
    Tony,
    Well even minus a big center, goodballhandling, and shooting, UMass'
    superbs must have been quyite superb because I'm quite impressed
    with both Temple and GWU in the tournament and UMass won the A10.
    Small solace I know....
    
    MikeL
    
77.68AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC-ExcellentLossInWaitingTue Mar 23 1993 15:408
    	You wonder about Caliperi, on Friday his team carves out a 10
    point lead by playing their style of ball then he tries to sit on
    the lead by calling off the dogs with lots of time left.  It almost
    cost them the Penn game and you have to wonder if it didn't carry
    over to Sunday.  The guy's done a great job with the UMASS program,
    but coaches can make mistakes too.
    
    				/Don
77.69SNAX::ERICKSONThe Giants have been saved....Tue Mar 23 1993 16:2216
	Even though the A-10 has 2 teams in the sweet 16, I'm not overly
impressed. A 7th seed Temple beat a 10th seeded Missouri, then beat a
15th seeded Santa Clara. The only quality win was GW a 12th seed upsetting
the 5th seeded New Mexico. They then beat the 13th seeded Southern. Southern
and Santa Clara came off of big upsets. Tough mentally to come off a big
upset then play 2 days later.
	I don't think Virginia beating UMASS is that big of an upset. Looking
at all the #3 seeds, UMASS would be the lowest ranked #3 seed IMO. Behind
Duke, Vanderbilt, and Florida St. Sure you can argue that the A-10 did
better than the Big East this year, which is true. Looking at the totals,
the A-10 has gone 6 - 2 thus far, they were favored to win 6 times the
underdog twice. GW upset win counters UMASS being upset by Virginia. The
Big East went 2 - 3, with them being the favoritie 3 times, underdog twice.

/Ron
77.70CTHQ::LEARYUS:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoneyTue Mar 23 1993 16:288
    Maybe I should clarify in stating that I am impressed with Temple and
    GWU now because I expected nothing from them. Temple looks like they
    can give people fits. And I agree that UMass losing to UVa is no upset
    to me anyhoo. Just lissen to Dickie V., he'll tell ya BABEEEEEEE!
    
    MikeL
    
    
77.71Looking for Mr. Big Man.....HOCUS::SALTALAMACCHTue Mar 23 1993 17:405
    Doesn't UMass have Big man Marcus Camby, a 6'11" C from CT coming in
    next year?  Then, they'll be no excuses.
    
    Redmen Phil
    
77.72GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Mar 24 1993 12:2620
         That's right, John Calipari will have no excuses in coming
    years.  He has won 90+ games over the past four years, with teams
    that included only one high school "blue-chipper", that being Loe
    Roe.  One recruiting service that I subscribe to had Roe rated as a
    top 50 coming out of Atlantic City H.S.  Jerome Malloy was rated
    in the 180 range, and Harper Williams as the 199th "best high schooler"
    his senior year.  (Bob Gibbons Recruiting Service)  Street & Smith
    and Dick Vitale had similar ratings)  Granted predicting how high
    school'ers will fare as collegians is an inexact science, but clearly,
    Calipari has not had "UNC type talent" to work with.
    
         Next year things change, as Donta Bright will be eligible and
    he is a concensus top 10, the aforementioned Marcus Camby has been
    rated by most as a top 50, and the three remaining recruits, Tyrone
    Weeks, Carmelo Traveiso and Edgar Padilla, show up on most top 100
    lists.  Whether Calipari can successfully merge this talented group
    of newcomers, with the five freshman and sophomores from this year's
    team, remains to be seen.
    
    Russ
77.73UMass WILL be back!!!!!!!!1TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 2-time A10 Champ!Wed Mar 24 1993 14:5847
    Calipari will have to do his best GAME coaching of his career next
    season to blend the recruits with thereturning players to gain a proper
    mix of talent.  This will be especially tough since none of the
    projected top ten players for the Minutemen nexted season will be
    seniors.  Here is a thumbnail sketch of the newcomers:
    
    1) Donta Bright:  6-6, 190 F.  Currently enrolled at UMassa as a Prop.
       48 student.  Will be a sophomore next year.  Consensus first team
       HS All-American last year.  Can play down low or on a wing.  Great
       leaper, excellent finisher on break, nice medium range jumper.
    
    2) Marcus Camby:  6-10 205 C.  Projected as starting C next season,
       replacing Harper Williams.  Will be named Connecticut player of
       the year.  Had a quadruple double (18 pts, 14 reb, 10 ast, 10 blk)
       in a game this season.  Rarely plays much more than a half because
       his team is so dominant.  Went for 32 pts and 14 reb in the title
       game to lead his school to the Conn. state championship.  Eligible.
    
    3) Tyrone Weeks:  6-7 245 F.  Quintessential power forward.  Averaging
       27 ppg, 15 rpg in tough Philly HS league.  Dominant of the boards
       at both ends.  Can score up to 12-14' with jumper.  Has a chance to
       start right away.  Not yet eligible.
    
    4) Edgar Padilla:  6-3 180 G.  Started as a freshman for Springfield
       team that lost in state finals, but won next year as a soph.  Great
       defensive player, 3-point range on his shot, makes excellent
       decisions on the floor.  Currently finishing HS in his native 
       Puerto Rico, while also playing in a men's league.  Not yet
       eligible.
    
    5) Carmelo Travieso:  6-2 175.  Currently at Thayer Academy.  Great
       3-point shooter with unlimited range.  Played on Boston AAU team
       that won national champiopnship last summer.  Also played on
       Boston Shootout team.  Eligible.
    
    So here's how the team looks for next season:
    
    C - Camby; Jeff Meyer (in cetain situations only)
    PF - Roe, Weeks. Cottrell
    SF - Dingle, Bright, Nunez
    SG - Malloy, Travieso, Berry
    PG - Kellogg, Williams, Padilla, Chris Robinson
    
    Robinson is the only senior in that group.
    
    NAZZ
    
77.74Lacrosse ScheduleGIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Mar 31 1993 17:5825
                      '93 Mens Lacrosse Schedule
                      --------------------------
    
    
               Mar. 24          @UVa.               L   10-9
               Mar. 27          @St.John's          W   25-4
               Apr. 3           @Hofstra
               Apr. 4           Duke (@Hofstra) 
               Apr. 7           @Providence
               Apr. 10          @Yale
               Apr. 14          @UNH
               Apr. 17          Delaware
               Apr. 21          @Harvard
               Apr. 24          Rutgers
               Apr. 28          BC
               May  1           Syracuse
               May  5           Brown (make-up of early season snow
                                       cancellation)
               May  8           Army
    
    - First team All-American Mark Millon returns at one of the attack
      positions for UMASS.
    
    Russ
        
77.75GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Apr 08 1993 14:487
         Two of Calipari's recruits have been recognized by USA Today as
    their respective state's High School Player of the Year, 6'2" 2G
    Carmelo Traveiso in Massachusetts, and 6'10" C Marcus Camby in
    Connecticut.  Donta Bright was so recognized last year, for the
    State of Maryland.
                                               
    Russ 
77.76CAMONE::WAYDon't start me to talkin'Thu Apr 08 1993 18:117
>    6'10" C Marcus Camby in
>    Connecticut.  Donta Bright was so recognized last year, for the


I also think that Camby is a 2nd Team PARADE HS All-American......

'Saw
77.77Things continue to look good at UMassTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 2-time A10 Champ!Thu Apr 08 1993 18:208
    Looks like UMass won't rebuild, they'll just reload!
    
    Could it be three straight A-10 titles for the Minutemen?  Considering
    how good teams like GW, Temple, West Virginia, and St. Joe's will be
    next year, it will be a tall order, but Calipari will have them in the
    midst of the battle for top honors.
    
    NAZZ
77.78New UMASS Hockey CoachGIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Apr 22 1993 13:0813
         In the old news department, UMASS tapped BC Assistant Coach, Joe
    Mallen (I think that's the name) to be the school's Head Hockey Coach,
    at a salary of $83K/yr.  The other candidates were Durocher (a B.U.
    Asst.), Leach (Spfld. Indians Head Coach), and the Head Coach from
    last year's NCAA Champ, Lake Superior State.  Personally I would
    snarfed the guy from Lake Superior.
    
         Surprisingly, the salary at UMASS would have been a significant
    increase for the Lake Superior Coach.  This once again highlights the
    significance of national TV contracts, as I would imagine that $83K
    represents "beer" money for the likes of Dean Smith and Rick Pitino.
    
    Russ
77.79Lacrosse NewsGIAMEM::SCHOTTFri May 07 1993 16:1329
         I took in last weekend's lacrosse game in Amherst, matching No.3
    Syracuse and No.7 UMASS.  In a game of many momentum swings, Syracuse
    prevailed 17-14.  UMASS controlled much of the play in the first half,
    but went into the half trailing as they blew several in close scoring
    opportunities.  Then early in the second half, Syracuse opened up
    a seven or eight goal lead, and it looked like a blowout was in the
    cards.  Then with about 6 minutes left UMASS made a charge, closing the
    gap to 16-14 with about a minute to go.  Syracuse closed out the 
    scoring in the final seconds, for the final three goal advantage.
    
         For you Orangemen fans, Syracuse has been croaking people since
    two close losses on the road (one at No.1, UNC) to begin the season,
    and is a legitimate contender for another National Championship.
    Although their attack is not anywhere as strong as the days when the
    Gait brothers played, their defense, goalie, and especially their
    faceoff man looked very strong.  Syracuse wraps up their season with
    Johns Hopkins today.
    
         Since last weekend, UMASS has knocked off No.5 Brown University,
    in a 8-6 defensive struggle, and ends their season with No.11 Army,
    at West Point.  Things look rosey for the future, as UMASS loses only
    four seniors from their 40 man roster, although one of the graduates
    will be All-American attackman and leading scorer, Mark Millon.
    
    Laxfan,
    
    Russ
    
         
77.80ACC Chris, not a 1-sport UNC Fan. :^)RHETT::KNORRUTOX Lives!Mon May 10 1993 14:275
    I saw the SU @ UNC lacrosse matchup on SportsSouth.  The Heels are in
    deep do-do now though, cause their goalie is injured.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.81Lacrosse ControverseyGIAMEM::SCHOTTTue May 11 1993 15:1421
         Staying on the subject of lacrosse for a moment, it seems the 
    NCAA Lacrosse Tournament Committee has given the royal shaft to Brown
    University, by leaving them out of this year's tournament.
    
         For those unfamiliar with NCAA lacrosse, 12 teams are invited,
    with the top four seeded teams getting a first round bye.  This 
    year, Brown University finished the regular season ranked 7th in
    the country (just ahead of 8th ranked UMASS).  The NCAA invited the
    1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, AND 15th
    ranked teams, number 15 being the Fighting Irish of Notre Dame!!!
    
         Brown spent most of the season ranked in the top 5, but finished
    the season with a couple of losses, one of which was to UMASS.  The
    Brown coach was a tad upset with this slight (to put it kindly), 
    according to today's Boston Globe!
    
    Russ
    
    - Could it be that there is an unwritten rule that only one New England
      school can participate in the Nat'l Lacrosse Tourney? 
     
77.82had to be saidCNTROL::CHILDSThe idea that nothing matters...Tue May 11 1993 15:246
    
>>    - Could it be that there is an unwritten rule that only one New England
>>    school can participate in the Nat'l Lacrosse Tourney? 
  
 the unwritten rule is invite Notre Dame at all costs.....   

77.83Don't know nuttin' about itCTHQ::LEARYI don't do ND spandexTue May 11 1993 16:0512
    Dat's right Mikey,
    Glad you finally see the light. You know that by inviting the Irish,
    a major network will want to pick up the vaunted lacrosse tourney,
    and the paying gate will automatically double from 6 to 12 wherever
    they play. Faultless logic by the committee, eh?
    
    MikeL
    
    Seriously tho, did ND get in by pewrhaps securing a_auto bid by
    winning a conference?  
    
    
77.84ND=LakersCNTROL::CHILDSThe idea that nothing matters...Tue May 11 1993 16:508
            <<< Note 77.83 by CTHQ::LEARY "I don't do ND spandex" >>>
                        -< Don't know nuttin' about it >-
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

   neither do I but I'm not gonna a little thing like knowledge stop me
   from slammin' ND....

 mike
77.853335::francusABPTue May 11 1993 17:026
MikeL,

Is ND in a conference in any sport??

The Crazy Met
77.86CTHQ::LEARYI don't do ND spandexTue May 11 1993 17:379
    
    Only ND football and men's BBall are independents. Hopefully only
    football will remain as such...
    
    Now about lax... anyonwe have the Nc2A schedule?? And how did ND
    qualify. What about UMass' chances?
    
    MikeL
    
77.87Why ND was selectedPULMAN::HEIERThu May 13 1993 14:436
    I think ND qualified because the tournament committee HAS
    to invite on WESTERN team a year and this year it is ND.
    
    Usually this team gets blown out in the first round.
    
    Larry
77.88SOLANA::MAY_BRInside Intel, but no Intel insideThu May 13 1993 16:296
    
    Did the tournament committe go the the Mr. T school of geography?  Or
    maybe they have some of those NC alums and their 700 combined SAT
    scores helping them out.
    
    brews
77.89MIMS::ROLLINS_RPaying for decades of Demo.CongressThu May 13 1993 22:286
	For lacrosse, the NCAA interprets "west" as west of the
	Appalachians.  Michigan State was another recent "west" invitee
	to the lacrosse tournament, as was Air Force (a legitimate western
	school).  I'm not sure if any other schools that qualified as the
	western team since they got an automatic bid once the tournament
	expanded from 8 to 12 teams.
77.90Summertime B-ball NewsGIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Jul 07 1993 19:2032
         A couple of UMASS Basketball tidbits:
    
    1.  In a surprising move, Jerome Malloy has withdrawn from school and
        will transfer to Jackson State.  Malloy was to be a junior, and 
        started at 2G for the Minutemen.  He averaged 11 ppg last season
        and was UMASS' primary 3 pt. threat.  Malloy had no better than
        average skills as a defender and ballhandler, and seemed to have
        a "slow release" on his shot, which resulted in having many of his
        shots blocked.  He also had an alarming tendency to disappear in
        big games.  However he did play significant minutes both as a
        freshman and as a sophomore, and his experience will be missed.
        Both Nazz and I are at a loss over why we would leave a starting
        position in a program on the rise, for a relatively obscure school,
        a great distance from his Waterbury, Ct. home.
    
    2.  Recruit Edgar Padilla, a 6'2" pg/2g from Springfield, Ma. has
        passed his SAT and will be eligible next season.  Both Bill Gusic
        and Nazz have seen him play in high school and are very, very high
        on his abilities.  Padilla spent his senior year in his native Puerto
        Rico, where he averaged 28 ppg for his high school team, and played
        in a men's league which includes most of the players from the
        Puerto Rican Olympic Team, and in which he was named "Newcomer of
        the Year".
    
    3.  Recruit Tyrone Weeks is awaiting word on whether he passed the SAT.
    
    4.  Recruit Marcus Camby, a 6'10" center from Hartford was listed as
        the 15th best high school senior in the country, in the final
        recruiting report put out by recruiting guru and NIKE Camp director
        Bob Gibbons.
    
    Russ
77.91UMass is *loaded*.RHETT::KNORRDECwindows SupportWed Jul 07 1993 21:0816
    re: Jerome Malloy
    
    Maybe they plan on playing Donta Bright at 2G?!  Doubtful I realize,
    but my hunch is this kid sees the writing on the wall (i.e. UMass
    talent level rapidly rising which likely leaves him on the outs lookin'
    in) and is taking pro-active measures.
    
    Could also be_a Billy McCaffery-type move that's intended to increase
    his exposure with his eye on the NBA.  McCaffery was guaranteed to
    start at WG for Dook but left anyways, thinking his only shot at
    NBA-bucks was at the point.  Fuel cain be added to this idle
    speculation when you consider that Jackson State produced
    lottery-selection Lindsay Hunter.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.92DECWET::METZGERThis is the song that never ends.Wed Jul 07 1993 22:1913
Malloy isn't NBA material and if he thinks that transfering to Jackson State is
suddenly going to make him an NBA caliper guard then he'd better prepare for a
long career flipping burgers at Mickey D's.

He was assured of significant playing time this season (junior year) and
probably a decent shot at PT his senior year with a still young minuteman squad.

Is he eligible this year or does he have to sit out a year after transfering?

This is puzzling,

Metz
77.93Perhaps Malloy didn't get along with CalipariTNPUBS::NAZZAROTake me for a little whileThu Jul 08 1993 14:0519
    He has to sit.
    
    I think there may have been a personality conflict between him and
    Coach Calipari.  There was a string of games near the end of the season
    where Malloy saw his playing time decrease, just before Mike Williams
    got hurt.
    
    The upcoming Minuteman roster will feature no more than one senior, who
    won't get any playing time.  Their top nine players should feature four
    freshmen (Camby, Weeks, Padilla, Travieso), two sophomores (Bright and
    Dingle) and three juniors (Roe, Williams, and Kellogg).
    
    BTW, I saw Roe play on an NIT All-star team with the likes of Sharone
    Wright and Lawrence Moten, and he played great.  It was against the
    Puerto Rico Olympic team  and the All-Stars only lost by 2, 92-90.
    Roe had 16 points and 13 rebounds.  Moten had 22, and both of them
    looked great.
    
    NAZZ
77.94GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Jul 08 1993 14:4031
    RE:  Jerome Malloy
    
         My impression of Jerome Malloy after watching him for two years
    is that he is a quiet, inwardly intense individual, who may not have
    responded well to Calipari's style of coaching.  Malloy rarely spoke
    to his teammates during games, didn't talk trash to his opponents, and
    didn't seem to smile much or show much of any emotion on the court.  
    My guess is that Coach Cal is not the easiest guy in the world to play for.
    If you watch Calipari on the sidelines he's the opposite of Malloy ....
    highly animated and not at all reluctant to get in the face of his
    players if they screw up on the court.  I imagine his practices after
    a loss are rather intense and rather loud!
    
          That being said, Malloy clearly suffered from a sophomore slump
    the second half of the season, and Mike Williams became a much more
    valuable contributor at this time.  For example, in the NCAA games,
    Malloy scored 2 points in 21 minutes against Penn and 7 points in 17
    minutes versus UVA.  Williams (also a sophomore) scored 13 points in
    21 minutes against Penn and 15 points in 30 minutes versus UVA.
    Factor in the arrival of two good swingmen in Dingle and Bright, and
    the recruitment of two highly rated guards in Carmelo Traveiso and
    Edgar Padilla (Traveiso at 6'3" would seem to be an almost identical
    player to Malloy, and is reputed to have a better 3 pt. shot) and
    the emergence of Mike Williams, and as ACC-Chris has speculated,
    perhaps he was worried about decreased playing time.
    
         Still, at this point, Donta Bright and the freshmen are unknown
    quantities, and I am disappointed to see Jerome Malloy leave.
    
    Russ
        
77.95I hope so...CNTROL::CHILDSLefty &gt; Dean Thu Jul 08 1993 15:165
 Has UMASS scheduled a game at the Centrum again this year???

 mike        

77.96Like I said, they're loaded.RHETT::KNORRDECwindows SupportThu Jul 08 1993 16:2012
    If UMass were in the BigEast they'd not only be favored to win the
    league (by a lot) but they'd also be on the cover of just about every
    college hoops rag in the USA.  (Most of 'em have regional cover shots.)
    
    As is, the media will flaunt them as_a "Cinderella Story" when
    they reach the Sweet16, and they'll be a downright "shock to the
    country" when they play in a Regional Final.
    
    blah,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.97GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Jul 08 1993 16:4715
    Re: .96
    
         I don't know where UMASS would be positioned if they were
    competing in the Big East this season, but I dare say they will be
    ranked no better than 3rd in A-10 preseason polls, behind Temple, the
    sure #1, and either WVU or GWU as #2.
    
         For UMASS to play up to ACC Chris' expectations, no less than
    three of the newcomers will have to emerge as immediate stars.
    
    Russ
    
    - keep in mind with the loss of Harper Williams, Tony Barbee and now
      Jerome Malloy, UMASS loses 41 ppg in scoring!
                                                   
77.98UMass *3rd*?! No way, Jose.RHETT::KNORRDECwindows SupportThu Jul 08 1993 16:496
    re: .-1
    
    Nice job of lowering expectations Russ.  MrT'd be most proud of you!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.99A10 is awfully strong if UMass is #3.RHETT::KNORRDECwindows SupportThu Jul 08 1993 16:526
    BTW, if the Hourmen really are preseason 3rd in the A10 it shows just
    how superior that league is to the BigLeast, cause they'd be (IMHO) 
    picked to win that league.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.100CNTROL::CHILDSLefty &gt; Dean Thu Jul 08 1993 17:109
>    BTW, if the Hourmen really are preseason 3rd in the A10 it shows just
>    how superior that league is to the BigLeast, cause they'd be (IMHO) 
>    picked to win that league.					  ^^^^^^
    								    ^
    					    any guesses how much this is worth?
    - ACC Chris

 Rasheed made a big mistake. Him, Harrington and Spencer could've dominated! 
77.101Haven't cried this much since yesterday's AllMyChildren.RHETT::KNORRDECwindows SupportThu Jul 08 1993 17:2311
    > Rasheed made a big mistake. Him, Harrington and Spencer could've
    > dominated!
    
    Boo hoo!!  Tears are rollin' down my cheeks, ... really!  Boo hoo!
    The BigLeast loses out on another one!  WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!111
    
    
    (Insert the obligatory thousand or so Haw haw's!)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.102Very YoungSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Jul 12 1993 16:198
      I like to think UMass will do really good this year, but
      I think they are a tad young.  I think it'll be them or
      Temple for the Atl. 10 though.
    
      My hope is that they are a legitemate final four threat the
      year after next.
    
                                               Tony
77.103More Summer B-ball NewsGIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Aug 03 1993 12:1721
         The Globe reported over the weekend that Tyrone Weeks, one of
    UMASS' recruits, did not receive the required score on the SAT/ACT's
    and thus will be ineligible for the coming season.  As of now, he plans
    to enroll at UMASS and not go the prep school route.  Weeks, a 6'7",
    245 lb. power forward, probably would have provided significant minutes
    in relief of starting forward Lou Roe.  In a year when the city
    of Philadelphia produced an exceptional crop of big men, such as
    Rasheed Wallace, Marc Jackson and Jason Lawson, Weeks was considered
    the best rebounder of the lot.
    
         In other news, it was reported that departed 2G Jerome Malloy is
    headed towards Jacksonville, and not Jackson State as previously
    thought.
    
         Also, 6'10" center Marcus Camby was named to the all star team at 
    the Olympic Festival in San Antonio.  This is a prestigious honor as
    some of the finest high school and early college basketball talent in
    the country, participated in this tournament.
    
    Russ
                         
77.104Camby is *awesome*. (Bright sips though ...)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Aug 12 1993 16:2024
    I caught some of the OlympicFestival on SportsSouth (main do I love
    this channel - among other things it gives me The Dean Smith Show
    during hoops season, which surpasses even Seinfeld as my favorite show
    on the toob.
    
    Anyhow, the underachieving East had Camby on the front line with
    Rasheed Wallace, and let there be no doubt that this kid Camby cain
    play!  Easily outdistanced Rasheed in virtually every phase of the
    game.  Wallace went the whole tourney with a total of one (1) blocked
    shot.
    
    It's time to jump on the UMass bandwagon people.  They will be a Top10
    team in the USA by seasons end IMHO.  A 7-footer with skills to go with
    their returning talent haul?!!  Awesome, baby.  (On a more somber note
    though, Donta Bright looked downright terrible.  The scoop on him is
    that his year away from basketball has really cost him.)
    
    I'm seriously hoping Wallace will benefit from Dean's unparalleled
    tuteladge, cause right now his game needs *work*.  Needs to hit the
    weight room, too.  Jerry Stackhouse will be the only frosh to
    contribute significantly for UNC this year.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.105GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Aug 16 1993 12:5050
    > "On a more somber note though, Donta Bright looked down right
       terrible."
    
         I have seen Donta Bright play in two All-Star games, once live and
    once on the tube, and I've yet to be overly impressed.  I hold out hope
    that his forte is "team play", and that he'll come into his own after a
    couple of months of practice and games.
    
         My fear is that he developed his game and his rep at an early age
    and hasn't really improved that much since he was 15!  Bright was
    Baltimore POTY as a soph, and then the following summer lit it up at
    the NIKE Camp and was named MVP there as well!  As a senior he was
    named Baltimore POTY again, and led his Dunbar team to the mythical
    H.S. National Championship, but was surrounded by a stellar supporting
    cast, and a couple of his teammates could easily have won the award.
    
         Clearly though, the Sports Festival is not a good barometer for
    projecting his college performance, as he admitted to being very rusty
    after a year away from topnotch competition.  BTW, as I may have
    mentioned in a previous note, Bright's intramural team finished
    RUNNER-UP in the UMASS Intramural Hoop Championship, this past winter!
    
         Given his buildup, I fear UMASS fans will be disappointed if he's
    not the second coming of Dr.J at small forward, or at least succeeds 
    Calbert Cheaney as the tops at that position.  I, on the other hand,
    think that a career more on the order of that turned in by Tony Barbee
    is more realistic.  (12 to 14 ppg/6 rpg)
    
         What's more fun to speculate on is the career of Marcus Camby.
    Over the course of his senior year and the all-star games that
    followed, he has elevated his reputation to where he is now considered
    among the top two or three center recruits in the country.  Supposedly,
    though parts of his game are still undeveloped, his speed and overall
    athletic ability, set him apart.  Many folks compare him to a young 
    Danny Manning!
    
         Where's that season ticket application?
    
    Russ
    
    - to carry on the discussion in another note, I expect big things from
      BC this season.  They are alot like the Jim McCoy led, UMASS team
      that went 30 and 5 two seasons ago.  A senior dominated team that
      has turned in winning records, dotted with numerous close losses 
      each year.  Now they've added a couple key recruits, and with the
      accumulated experience, they should walk away with the Big East.
      Coach Jimmy O'Brien might be their only "achilles heel".
                                                              
         
    
77.106UMass' basketball schedule out - it's a killer!TNPUBS::NAZZAROReggie Lewis - R.I.P.Fri Sep 24 1993 15:1425
    Here's some UMass information for you:
    
    1) UMass is one of three schools in the running for 6-8 PF Dan Forsten
    from Pittsburgh.  Other two schools are Cincinnati and Wisconsin.
    Forsten is supposed to be one of the top 5 prep players in the country.
    
    2) Jerome Malloy allegedly had a drinking problem, and he refused to go
    for help to deal with it.  This led to his split with the university.
    
    3) In addition to the preseason NIT, here is UMass' non-Atlantic 10
    schedule (in the order in which they are played)
    	1) at Oklahoma
    	2) home vs Central Connecticut
    	3) at Holy Cross (in the Centrum)
    	4) Abdow's Classic (UMass vs Hartford; Hofstra vs Maryland)
    	5) at DePaul (Rosemont Horizon)
    	6) at Cincinnati
    	7) home vs Florida State (Feb. 3)
    	8) vs Kentucky at the Meadowlands
    	9) home vs Manhattan (Midnight Madness)
    
    That's got to be one of the toughest non-conference schedules around!
    
    NAZZ
    	
77.107VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDIKnowWhatToDo,WithSomeoneLikeYouFri Sep 24 1993 16:494
    	Hey NAZZ, is there a date on the Holy Cross game at the Centrum
    yet, and is that the only game UMASS will play there?
    
    				/Don
77.108ALso don't know if it's day or nightTNPUBS::NAZZAROReggie Lewis - R.I.P.Fri Sep 24 1993 17:344
    I should have the exact date by Monday, but I know it's a weekend
    day in December (maybe the 12th?).
    
    NAZZ
77.109VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDIKnowWhatToDo,WithSomeoneLikeYouFri Sep 24 1993 18:195
    	Thanks NAZZ, I had a great time at the Centrum watching your
    Minutemains lasted year.  Maybe I can talk Waddle into getting tickets
    for the Kaintuck game.
    
    				/Don
77.110GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Oct 06 1993 18:1714
         I have come across two bits of interesting news regarding the
    '93-94 UMASS Men's Basketball Team:
    
    1.  The "Midnight Madness" opening practice at 12 midnight on Halloween
        will be televised live (portions thereof) by ESPN.  UMASS will
        share the stage that evening with UNC and Kentucky.
    
    2.  It was reported in Amherst that the Dick Vitale Basketball Preview
        Magazine will name UMASS Recruit Marcus Camby as its "Newcomer of 
        the Year".  The last two hoopsters so named were Glenn Robinson of 
        Purdue and Chris Webber of Michigan.  
    
    Russ
         
77.111and of course UNC victoriesCNTROL::CHILDSthems that die are the lucky onesWed Oct 06 1993 18:407
 great recommendation for Camby but somebody else must pick those guys for
 him cause Vitale ain't that smart.........

 the only part of the NCAA I don't miss or look forward too...

 mike
77.112SKEWED::MCKAYThu Oct 07 1993 15:366
    C'mon how tough was it to pick Robinson or Webber.  Maybe Camby
    will smarten up and transfer to the one BIG TIME program in N.E.
    
    Too early to hype the Huskies????
    
    Jimbo
77.113Big Time Program?GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Oct 07 1993 16:044
         Northeastern??  They haven't been big time since the late Reggie
    Lewis graduated. ;^)!
    
    Russ
77.114equally as impressiveCNTROL::CHILDSthems that die are the lucky onesThu Oct 07 1993 16:065
 For Vitale???? dam tough after all they weren't playing for FSBD or CoachK..
 Besides given his love of ball wizards I'd thought he'd pick Kidd....

 mike
77.115By season's end, you won't wanna face the Minutemen.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Oct 07 1993 16:159
    Having seen Camby sparkle during the Olympic Festival I cain definitely
    vouch that he's gonna be a force, but Webber/Robinson material?  Wail
    we'll just hafta wait and see.
    
    Suffice to say that with Camby UMass is the clear-cut A10 favorite and
    should be Top10 in the USA.  Clearly the best team in the NorthEast.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.116CSC32::M_MACGREGORThu Oct 07 1993 16:2811
    
    >Northeastern?? They haven't been big time since the late Reggie
    >Lewis graduated. ;^)!
    
    Depends on how you define big time.  I seem to remember Northeastern
    winning 10-8 after about 10 minutes of the game against North Carolina
    in '91 before sucumming in the final few minutes to lose by 40 or so
    points 8^)
    
    Marc
    
77.117new contest opening up - Name THAT SCHOOL!!!!!!!CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesWed Oct 13 1993 15:2514
    
    	Yabbut ya gotta love those whatevers over in Amherst.  Latest
    story has the Pres (or somebody) reviewing petitions/protests/etc.
    to have the school nickname changed from the "minutemen" to some other
    PC thang.
    
    I don't remember the logical (ha!) arguement 'cept that some loonies
    find "Minutemen" offensive.
    
    
    I remain,
    lovin my tax dollars at work!  Whatta country!
    Kev
    
77.118USCTR1::KINGLook, I can hear what you are thinking.....Wed Oct 13 1993 15:334
    Seems people out there are offended by a white man carry a gun...
    
    
    REK
77.119GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Oct 13 1993 15:5115
         Speaking of our tax dollars at work, an article in the Globe this
    week discloses that some State engineering team has found that the new
    Mullins Center has some structural deficiencies that could make it
    unsafe in hurricane force winds or in a moderate earthquake.  A
    structural consultant hired by UMASS refutes those charges.
    
         Given the sorry record of construction contracts awarded by UMASS
    over the years (the falling bricks from the facade of the world's
    tallest library, the structural cracks and perpetually leaky roof at
    the Campus Center), you have to wonder about payoffs changing hands.
    
    Russ
    
    - who well remembers the collapse of the Hartford Civic Center roof,
      just hours after a UMASS-UCONN b-ball game
77.120maybe we can keep him for more than 2 years this way..DECWET::METZGEROwner of the scorpion petting zoo.Wed Oct 13 1993 17:024
I think the University of Massachusetts Calipari's has a nice ring to it....

Metz
77.121MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Oct 13 1993 17:153
 Ever think that just maybe it's the players themselves that ain't too
thrilled about being called Minutemen?
77.122ROYALT::ASHEDon't play dat song, dat Achybreaky songWed Oct 13 1993 17:433
    Should it be Minutepeople?
    60 Minutemen?
    
77.123LAGUNA::MAY_BRAin't no cure for the overseed bluesWed Oct 13 1993 17:476
    
    That's almost as bad as Marquette changing its name because Warriors is
    offensive.  It's a good thing animals and physical objects can't talk,
    or we'd not be able to have any team nicknames.
    
    brews
77.124CNTROL::CHILDSthems that die are the lucky onesWed Oct 13 1993 17:474
AS T said why waste 59 minutes when you can get in over in less than 1???

mike
77.125Pepper Rodgers gets first crack at the HelmCNTROL::CHILDSthems that die are the lucky onesWed Oct 13 1993 17:506
speaking of nicknames, If Memphis gets a football team they're going to
call them the Hound Dogs and play up the Elvis angle to the max...Sounds
like the perfect place for Jerry.....

mike
77.126didhe mean Manute instead??? ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesWed Oct 13 1993 17:5716
    
>>    Should it be Minutepeople?
  		   ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    
    Mr. Moderator, I strongly object to the use of this word here!  Since
    I resemble that remark ;^) I feel that the author has insulted me,
    degraded me and generally tried to discriminate against all those who
    don't resemble that remark!
    
    I DEMAND that you have someone whack his pee-pee!
    
    I remain,
    life's little pleasure for more than 1 minute!
    Kev
        
77.127MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Oct 13 1993 17:582
 Kev, I think you ought to switch to decaf.
77.128METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 13 1993 18:485
> Kev, I think you ought to switch to decaf.

look who's talking.

The Crazy Met
77.129MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Oct 13 1993 19:165
    
     Thank you, TCM for that scathing I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I? note.
    In the future please refrain from trying to post with the big boys in
    the UMass note and stick to that blessing to insomniacs everwhere - 
    baseball.
77.130METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 13 1993 19:203
wattsa matter Tommy, can't take the heat??

The Crazy Met
77.131CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Oct 14 1993 18:4867
    
    Seems there's a trouble brewin' out in Amherst these days, with some
    students protesting the use of the word "Minuteman" as the nickname
    of the school's sports teams. This comes on the heels of Marquette
    University deciding to drop the nickname "Warriors" because it might
    offend our First Americans. Now I wasn't aware the the term (in
    whatever language) was endemic to Amerinds. Throughout time immemorial,
    the term "warrior" connoted a person to be respected and revered for
    defending his/her tribe or society; a universal symbol for all
    races. But I'll get off that soapbox.  At UMass, students feel that
    the Minuteman character( you know, the stolid colonial holding a gun)
    connotes violence. The Minuteman, according to one student protestor,
    is nothing more than a "white man with a gun". The student group claims
    that this logo is a symbol of oppression and a reminder of the
    slaughtering of an Indian tribe in Amherst by the local militia. They
    want to call the teams "Liberators" The spokesperson goes on "If the
    school really wants to achieve multiculturalism it will have to make
    some sacrifices. We need a mascot more approriate to higher education,
    not something that symbolizes violence."
    
    Now I won't comment on this quote but Gerry Calahan, a Boston Herald
    columnist and UMass alum sure does. Gerry just assumed that the name
    Minuteman was a trivute to the sexual prowess of the average boy.
    Gerry goes on to offer some alternatives:
    
    Minutepersons
    UMass Debators
    UMass Holes
    Of course these might offend
    
    He continues
     
    The UMass Bloated Bureaucrats- 
    UMass Chancellor David Scott,Callahan suggests, could do something
    useful for his $150K salary, by leading the cheers at the football
    games and wrasslin' with Fightin' Blue Hen at halftime.
    
    The UMass Cows
    Reflecting the agricultural history of the region and honor an
    oppressed and underappreciated species. Unfortunately, Callahan
    writes, it might offend some of the fat chicks on campus.
    
    The UMass Masses
    This would be an inclusive nickname, inoffensive and thoughtful. It
    might be tough to come up with a logo, Callahan continues, for such
    an abstract name. Maybe they could just go with the hammer and sickle.
    
    The UMass Trojans
    The logo can be a condom and they could pass them out at halftime.
    Callahan thinks the best thing about it, of course, is that the
    Catholic Church will hate it.
    
    The UMassGredy,Insensitive,Meanspirited,Good-for-Nothing White Guys
    Callahan states "Who could this possibly offend? I can't think of a
    soul."
    
    Callahan wraps up "Of course, there is a simple,inexpensive solution
    to this whole silly problem. The UMass teams can keep their logo
    with the same old Minuteman. All they have to do is tell
    everyone he's gay."
    
    
    Well I believe Callahan has just about offended everyone. So now
    he can go home and have a homebrew, just like those students should.
    
    MikeL
    
77.1321 of 3 to be shown.......CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesFri Oct 15 1993 15:1819
    
    	Yabbut I don't know if it's been mentioned yet, and even if it has,
    tough doo-doo it's slow here today so I'll just gobble up s'more disk
    space.
    
    Da magical tee vee weaving of John Calipari, head basketball coach, has
    gotten the UMass <hold while we try to figure out a non-offensive, PC
    name> scheduled to be on ESPN tee vee at midnight, Oct. 31.  This is
    what they call "Midnight Madness" and since NCAA rules say that the
    earliest time basketball teams can begin practice is November 1, at
    ezzactly 00:01 they'll be practicing.
    
    Since this is also Halowwen night, does anybody know if the ghosts and
    goblins are required to be back at midnight?
    
    I remain,
    thinkin it may be time to start our DROOD stuff......
    Kev
    
77.133PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 15 1993 15:392
    According to a news report on the Minuteman thing I saw last night,
    this whole ruckus is being caused by around 30 students.
77.134wowCNTROL::CHILDSthems that die are the lucky onesFri Oct 15 1993 16:127
yabbut they could start on saturday 10/30 if they want cause anytime that
Nov 1 falls on a monday you can start practicin' the saturday before like
BK will do but Calpari's more interested in image and selling the program
which is fine. BK's above that as Patheon dweller.....

mike
77.135Where Are The Easterns At?STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Oct 18 1993 18:586
      Just wondering,
    
        Where are the eastern regionals at?  How about the eastern location
        that pares the eastern from 8 to 4?
    
                                                     Tony
77.136METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Oct 18 1993 19:025
> that pares the eastern from 8 to 4?

I know you meant 4 to 1.

The Crazy Met
77.137yupSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Oct 18 1993 19:074
      re -1
    
      yeah.  I was thinking of the total teams left and not exclusively
      to the east.
77.138:-)METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Oct 18 1993 19:093
which would make it 16 to 4.

The Crazy Met
77.139noname changeCSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesMon Oct 18 1993 19:1512
    
    	Yabbut and oh by the way,
    
    The President of UMAss decided not to change the school's nickname.
    
    It shall remain the Minutemen (until the PC fanatics think of something
    else).
    
    I remain,
    shaking ma haid
    Kev
    
77.140MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Oct 18 1993 19:172
 Hey Craze, do you have an answer for the guy or not?
77.141of course notMETSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Oct 18 1993 19:205
> Hey Craze, do you have an answer for the guy or not?

come on Tommy, you would be real disappointed if I did.

The Crazy Met
77.1421994 NCAA B-ball LocationsGIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Oct 19 1993 16:1019
    Re:  77.135
    
    Tony:
    
         NCAA First and Second Rounds
    
           East  Nassau Coliseum, Uniondale, N.Y.
                 USAir Arena, Landover, Md.
    
         NCAA Regionals
    
           East  Miami Arena, Miami, Fl.
    
         Final Four
    
           Charlotte Coliseum, Charlotte, N.C.
    
    Russ
    
77.143yippee!HBAHBA::HAASIrmo Okra StrutTue Oct 19 1993 16:213
>         Final Four
>    
>           Charlotte Coliseum, Charlotte, N.C.
77.144So who cares.....POCUS::SALTALAMACCHWed Oct 20 1993 02:165
    I just received my Nassau Coliseum Eastern Regional tickets in the
    mail.
    
    Redmen Phil
    
77.145GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Oct 20 1993 11:5212
    Hey Redmen Phil:
    
         If St.John's gets by Towson and UMASS defeats Cleveland St. in the
    First Round of the Preseason NIT, the Redmen and Minutemen will meet in
    the Second Round.  The winner of the Second Round game will receive the
    dubious honor of meeting, in all probability, defending NCAA Champ
    North Carolina.
    
         Could establish early season bragging rights between the BE and
    A10!
    
    Russ
77.146Defending champs and also clear cut preseason #1 in USARHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 20 1993 14:2011
    > of meeting, in all probability, defending NCAA Champ North Carolina.
    
    My that has a nice ring to it!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
    BTW, Carolina has no cakewalk in the NIT.  We got Cincinnati at home
    in the first round, and a win brings on somebody else that's tough but 
    I can't remember who.  On the plus side though, both games are in the 
    Dean Dome. :^)
77.147METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Oct 20 1993 14:465
>  BTW, Carolina has no cakewalk in the NIT

already setting up the excuses.

The Crazy Met
77.148We should win, .... by alot.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 20 1993 14:518
    re: Cincinnati
    
    I recognize that the Bearcats are a preseason Top10 club, but I'm not
    crazy about their chances of coming into the Dean Dome minus 6 of their
    top 7 players from last year and coming away with a 'W'.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.149nuff saidHBAHBA::HAASLouHoltz,MrT,KnorrWed Oct 20 1993 14:550
77.150HAHA, two disciples_a_ReverendSandbagCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Oct 20 1993 15:591
    
77.151Towson St., UMass, who knows what could happen...HOCUS::SALTALAMACCHTue Oct 26 1993 18:548
    Re: 145
    
    That's true, a second round game vs. UMass.  My SJU season tickets
    arrived yesterday, and lo and behold, tickets were included for a 
    second round NIT game at Home (Alumni Hall), which could be UMass.
    
    Redmen Phil
    
77.152UMass Nationally Televised GamesSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Oct 28 1993 16:1914
    Yesterday's USA Today gave out the TV schedule for one of the
    networks.  I think it was ABC.  Two of the nationally televised
    games:
    
                       Feb 6 (Sunday) UMass/Kentucy at the Meadowlands.
    
                       Feb 13         Temple at UMass
    
    I wonder who is picked to win the Atl. 10, UMass or Temple?  Temple
    looked awful good last year in the tourney hanging tough with Michigan
    (but then again, didn't everybody?)  I think they're returning most
    of their players.
    
                                                      Tony
77.153George Washington & UMass are ranked as well.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Oct 28 1993 16:527
    re: Tony
    
    Temple is not only picked to win the A10, but to challenge for a Title. 
    Seems everybody has 'em in the Top 10.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.154METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Oct 28 1993 18:026
And if channel 5 in Boston sticks to form, those 2 games will not be 
televised in the Boston area.  ABC does not let channels pick and choose
games from their Sunday college basketball schedule. The last 2 (more?) years,
WCVB has not carried ABC's college basketball games.

The Crazy Met
77.155Probably a 5 to 8 In The CountryESKIMO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Oct 28 1993 18:036
      Chris,
    
        Yeah, I kind of thought so.  It'll be tough for UMass to beat out
        Temple this year.  I like Temple, but I like UMass better.
    
                                                     Tony
77.156They'll be on. Couldn't imagine no tv for KentuckyKALI::MORGANThu Oct 28 1993 19:473
    If ch. 5 doesn't televise those UMass games, look for ch. 25 or 27 to.
    
    					Steve
77.157GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Oct 28 1993 19:5322
         I think Temple is a Top 10 Team but not of Final Four Quality.
    They have one of the best perimeter threesomes in the country in McKie,
    Jones and Brunson, but their two big men Cunningham and Battie, while
    talented, are a bit too inconsistent.  Chaney is also famous for his
    seven man rotation, and this lack of depth always seems to bite him
    during at least one game during the Tourney!
    
         An A-10 Team that is not getting much recognition in the Rags is
    West Virginia.  Four years ago the recruiting class of PV Greene, Ricky
    Robinson, Marcellus Basey, Phil Wilson and Mike Boyd was one of the 
    top ranked incoming groups in the country.  Since then, they've put
    up several 18 win seasons, but have been largely a disappointment.  Now
    they are seniors, and this is last call.  Much like BC in the Big East,
    I expect WVU to be a very tough team this season.   
    
         I think UMASS, GWU and WVU will all be in the running for second
    place in the A-10 this year, with the edge going to WVU.  UMASS and GWU
    are just too young.
    
    Russ
    
    Russ
77.158METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Oct 28 1993 20:278
re: .155

You missed the problem. channel 5 has in the last 2 years asked to televise
games that had local interest. ABC said you can show all the Sunday college
hoops games or none of them. Presumably 25 or 27 would run into the same
problem.

The Crazy Met
77.159PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 28 1993 20:393
    The solution is obvious, TCM.  You don't like the Boston media, you
    want to see more coverage of teams from outside of the Boston area
    (particularly NY teams).  So, move back to New York!
77.160try to do a civic duty and ....METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Oct 28 1993 20:475
I don't really give hoot if channel 5 covers college hoops. just doing a public
service of preparing all those folks who expect to see UMass-Kentucky that
they may be out of luck.

The Crazy Met
77.161Without a doubtKALI::MORGANFri Oct 29 1993 10:584
    I'd bet a paycheck that UMass/Kentucky will be on the tube here in the
    Boston area, one way or another.
    
    					Steve
77.162You folks oughta *welcome* the trend toward PPVRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Oct 29 1993 11:527
    No FSU-Miami football game; blacked out college hoops; no 'The Dean
    Smith Show' ....
    
    As if I needed even more reasons to move oughta the NorthEastCorridor!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.163CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childFri Oct 29 1993 11:556
the reason the idiots at channel 5 avoid the games is because they generally
tend to be Big 11 games so they don't feel there will be any interest. What
idiots. thank somebody that channel 27 isn't so stupedo!!

mike
77.164PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 29 1993 12:258
77.165METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Oct 29 1993 12:564
who televised FSU-Miami?? why wasn't it on 5 (BC game???). Usually 25 or 27
picks that Sat. game up - I think.

The Crazy Met
77.166MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Oct 29 1993 12:572
    
     Channel 27 out of Worcester televised the Miami-FSU game.
77.167PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 29 1993 13:203
77.168METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Oct 29 1993 14:243
did we? could be, I don't remember.

The Crazy Met
77.169Midnight MadnessSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Nov 02 1993 16:364
      I missed it...how was the midnight madness show?  How did UMass
      look?
     
                                                    Tony
77.170GIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Nov 02 1993 19:3630
         The ESPN Midnight Madness Show was in my opinion, largely
    disappointing.  It featured Dick Vitale, doing his "off the wall"
    thing from Chapel Hill, a reserved Kentucky Wildcat grad commentator
    reporting in from Lexington, and Bill Raftery reporting from Amherst.
    
         Hardly any time was spent showing the three teams scrimmaging.
    Considerable time was spent on the UNC and UK Dunking Contests
    (patterned after the NBA All Star Weekend Dunking Contest) and less
    time was focused on the UMASS Contest, which was in reality a John
    Calipari fitness drill (ie. how many consecutive dunks can be made
    from a standing two-footed start under the basket, before the player
    collapses).   
    
         Calipari was interviewed and he had nice things to say about
    Lou Roe and Derek Kellogg.  Roe has added 10 lbs. and looks to be
    in mega shape!  On a humorous note, during the dunking drill, freshman
    Marcus Camby was up to 8 or 10 in a row, and starting losing his
    shorts.  He fumbled the ball going up his next dunk and missed it,
    pulled up his shorts, and turned around and gave a big smile for the
    camera!  During the closing credits, Camby was shown going in alone
    on a fast break during the scrimmage and doing a reverse jam.  No
    mention was made of Donta Bright.
    
         Clearly the event is a made for the fans, made for TV
    extravaganza.  Dean Smith seemed to let his assistants run the
    practice, and was interviewed sitting in the stands.  Clearly, the
    serious practices started on Saturday, as evidenced by all the injuries
    Carolina suffered during the "real thing".
    
    Russ
77.171METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Nov 02 1993 19:387
what night was Midnight Madness??

The Crazy Met

oh yeah is UMass still playing a midnight game this year or are they
too big for that these days.

77.172is 12:00 am or pm?HBAHBA::HAASNo sir. I don't like it.Tue Nov 02 1993 19:535
Crazy,

I thought the question was when does the Midnight Madness start?

TTom
77.173There will be another "one this yearTNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics win 1993-94 NBA TitleWed Nov 03 1993 19:364
    UMass has a Midnight Madness game scheduled against Manahattan on
    Friday, February 18.
    
    NAZZ
77.174UMASS Hoop will have to do 8-)ROCK::MURPHYThe two LousMon Nov 15 1993 13:456
    Anyone have the ticket number? For that matter, anyone interested
    in getting a group together for a game? I am interested in seeing 
    Kentcuky or FSU if they aren't sold out.
    
    Murph
    
77.175GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Nov 15 1993 16:074
         The number for the UMASS Athletic Ticket Office is 413-545-0810.
    The Kentucky game is not being played in Amherst, but rather at the
    Meadowlands (NJ).  The game with Florida State is being played on campus 
    on Thursday, February 3rd.                                     
77.176Hmm...ROCK::MURPHYThe two LousMon Nov 15 1993 16:206
    I assume, then, that tickets are available for UMass-UK in the big
    arena? I think it is a Friday, would be a good combo with a NYC trip.
    Can you get a train from Manhattan to the Meadowlands?
    
    Murph
    
77.177CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdMon Nov 15 1993 16:2416
>    I assume, then, that tickets are available for UMass-UK in the big
>    arena? I think it is a Friday, would be a good combo with a NYC trip.
>    Can you get a train from Manhattan to the Meadowlands?
>    

I don't think so. 

I'm not from the area so don't hold me to this, but one time a guy
came to Giantsmania from up in the city.  He had to go on the subway
for a while and took a cab part of the way.

Maybe JoJ_NOT or /Don know.....


'Saw    

77.178VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNewJoisey-WeMindVeryMuchIfYouVote...Mon Nov 15 1993 17:196
    	JoJ called the TicketPro/TicketMaster (whatever they're called now)
    in Joisey and they told him one could purchase tickets for the Kaintuck
    game from the Massachusetts TicketPro/TicketMaster.  I haven't tried
    yet.
    
    				/Don
77.179A fun day in New Jersey (is that an oxymoron?)TNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics win 1993-94 NBA TitleTue Nov 16 1993 12:424
    The Kentucky/UMass game is on a Sunday afternoon in the Meadowlands,
    followed by the Nets/San Antonio at 6:00.  Not a bad doubleheader!!!
    
    NAZZ
77.180UMass On TV: 7:30 PMSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Nov 18 1993 13:104
      Cleveland State at UMass tonight on ESPN.  First chance to
      see Marcus Camby and Donta Bright.
    
                                                  Tony
77.181I just might have to give my buddy John Hendry a call!RHETT::KNORRDean &gt; WoodenThu Nov 18 1993 13:165
    I hope everyone realizes that UMass & UNC could be headed for a
    collision in the NIT semifinals next weekend.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.182Don't count out the Redmen.....POCUS::SALTALAMACCHThu Nov 18 1993 18:584
    The Redmen may have sometihing to say about that.
    
    Redmen Phil
    
77.183And MinnesotaSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Nov 18 1993 19:562
      What bracket is Minnesota in?  They might have something to
      say about things too.
77.184halftime scoreSTRATA::GARRYDallas Cowboys back where they belong #1Thu Nov 18 1993 23:401
    at the half UMASS has a 36-31 lead over CVleve St
77.185USCTR1::KINGBe a MAN, low maintenance!!!Fri Nov 19 1993 11:433
    St Johns lose lasted night...
    
    REK
77.186lookout, here comes the silk purseCSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesFri Nov 19 1993 11:4510
    
    Yabbut damm  :*(
    
    Oh well, I suppose we needed to get that one under our belt just to
    avoid the pressure of going through the entire season undefeated  :^)
    
    I remain,
    still 50% of DEC's SJU fan club
    Kev
    
77.187UMass Thoughts - Like How Bright Creates ShotsSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Nov 19 1993 15:4534
      I saw most of the UMass game.
    
      Its' just a first game and I suppose that is the cause of a lot
      of the poor play (such as ~37% from the free throw line!!!!!!)
      That is a disgrace.
    
      I have to wonder...why does UMass so consistently not be able to 
      shoot the basketball where it belongs (in the rim)?  Is this
      a statistical anomaly or is it a coaching problem or does UMass 
      tend to recruit people who can't shoot in the first place?  I
      simply don't understand it.  The few times I see them, one thing
      they cannot do is shoot the basketball.  They just can't do it!
    
      Why?
    
      UMass looks real strong at the center position.  Camby and the 
      reserve both looked good.  And I thought Donta Bright showed huge
      potential.  Typically, I see Umass get one of two type shots on
      a half court offense.  Either a perimeter shot or a type of close
      shot where there is a lot of banging underneath, the shot is thus
      usually not in, and the guy goes to the line.  Bright was creating
      for himself 5 to 10 footers where there was noone to block it, it
      was just up to him to knock it in.  And I know they weren't going
      in, but he was the only guy creating that sort of shot and I believe
      they will go in.  So that leaves a real nice starting five.  Camby
      and Roe banging inside.  Kellog running the show at the point,
      Williams mainly at the perimeter, and Bright creating from that 5 to
      10 feet area.  If it clicks it would seem they can score in a lot of
      versatile ways.  After seeing Bright, I have a lot of hope for him
      to be a real offensive force in a unique way.
    
      Of course, defensively UMass is all set.
    
                                                       Tony
77.188GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Nov 19 1993 16:1932
         There has been a lot of discussion about the fact that shooting
    percentages, especially from the free throw line, have been declining
    in recent years.  There are two popular explanations for this.  One,
    that players such as Michael Jordan and Dr. J have popularized a style
    of play that put a high emphasis on taking it to the hoop and dunking.
    In this style of play, shooting from the outside is less glamorized,
    thus it is not practiced.  Secondly, the players that have the physical
    skills to excell at the college level, often come from the inner city
    or from poor rural backgrounds.  The highest level of play in high
    school is not typically found at your middle class and upper middle class
    suburban high schools.  Often times these kids spend much of their time
    playing on outdoor courts, where environmental factors such as the
    wind, poor lighting and bent rims affect the trajectory of outside 
    shots.  In such an environment, the in close shot or the drive to the
    hoop really becomes the high percentage shot.  If you read the
    recruiting rags, all college coaches are bemoaning the lack of quality
    long range shooters.  It's just not a UMASS problem.
    
         I will agree that the above does not excuse a free throw
    percentage of under 50%, such as UMASS turned in last night.  I mean
    even a no talent 6'1" forward playing high school ball in the late
    '60's (me) could knock down free throws at a 70%+ clip!
    
         I didn't see the game last night, but listened to parts of it,
    and was encouraged to hear about the play of Mike Williams, Jeff
    Meyer, Donta Bright and Edgar Padilla.  Clearly the team played
    sloppily, but the defense is there, and there is a lot of room 
    for improvement on the offensive end, especially if some of the open
    shots start to fall!
    
    Russ
               
77.189Anybody got John Hendry's phone number/internet address?RHETT::KNORRDean &gt; WoodenSun Nov 21 1993 14:274
    UMass vs. UNC, Wednesday night.  Be thare!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.190UMass wins twice; Calipari realistic about game vs UNCTNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics win 1993-94 NBA TitleMon Nov 22 1993 17:2519
    UMass, after a lethargic opening night win over Cleveland St., trounced
    Towson St. 82-55 in a game that wasn't that close.  Towson obviously
    was emotionally spent after beating Big Least power St. John's.
    
    Freshman center Marcus Camby sparkled against Towson, with 16 points,
    13 rebounds, and at least a half dozen blocks.  Lou Roe led UMass with
    24 points and 11 rebounds, and freshman starpshooter Carmelo Travieso
    hit three 3-pointers among his 11 points.  The duo of Dana Dingle and 
    Donta Bright were steady at small forward, combining for 16 points and
    13 rebounds.
    
    Coach John Calipari was asked if he thought UMass had a legitimate
    chance to beat North Carolina Wednesday in Madison Sq. Garden.  He
    replied:  "We have no chance to win this game, none at all.  North
    Carolina is too strong, too deep, too talented.  There is absolutely no
    way we can hope to win this game; I just hope we don't get
    embarrassed."
    
    NAZZ 
77.191UMass has *all* the psychological advantages ...RHETT::KNORRDean &gt; WoodenMon Nov 22 1993 17:4120
    Nazz, did Calipari go to the LouHoltz school of Psychological
    preparedness?  
    
    Sheesh, the guy's recruiting big-time studs (including a kid Dick
    Vitale apparently rates higher than Wallace/Stackhouse) and now he's
    got "no chance".  Obviously he plans on having his charges play
    loose-as-a-goose basketball, with absolutely nothing to lose.  
    
    Toward that end, me and Dean are worried.  In addition to Calipari's
    clever ploy, the game represents a homecoming affair for Derrick 
    Phelps & Brian Reese, and usually kids play lousy with all the 
    distractions.  Strike 3 may be the fact that the last time Carolina
    played in Madison Square Garden (2 years ago) we got bested by a VERY
    undermained Notre Dame squad who played the game of their lives.  (They 
    did have LeRon Ellis though ....)
    
    Ugh.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.192What about Dock and Jimmy?DOCTP::TESSIERMon Nov 22 1993 17:4611
Re.

> we got bested by a VERY
> undermained Notre Dame squad who played the game of their lives.  (They 
> did have LeRon Ellis though ....)

Interesting that Boeheim would let Ellis leave Syracuse for the night
(or was he already with the Clippers by that point?) to play alongside
LaPhonso. ;)

Ken
77.193:^oRHETT::KNORRDean &gt; WoodenMon Nov 22 1993 17:551
    
77.194Let's give credit due to ACC-Chris hereAKOCOA::BREENMon Nov 22 1993 18:0216
    Ken,
    	I have to give Chris absolution on this one as even a straight 800s
    guy cannot possibly keep the LaPhonsos and LeRons straight along with
    all the Smiths,Walkers,Jacksons and Williams.
    
    	I mean he'd have to have a guidebook or something at his desk to
    sneak a peek at and I know Chris does all this in his head.
    
    	But ACC did have the same thought I did - Cal'p'i doth protesteth too
    much but the guy he reminded me of was more the original poor mouth
    from the mid-south (hint-His picture is the 8x11 in ACC's office next
    to the snap shot of wife and family)(2nd hint - note caps).
    
    	And never let it be said that a big east fan can't give ACC-C some
    credit
    
77.195Where'd you get your training, ACC?NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 22 1993 18:1517
             
>    Toward that end, me and Dean are worried.  In addition to Calipari's
>    clever ploy, the game represents a homecoming affair for Derrick 
>    Phelps & Brian Reese, and usually kids play lousy with all the 
>    distractions.  Strike 3 may be the fact that the last time Carolina
>    played in Madison Square Garden (2 years ago) we got bested by a VERY
>    undermained Notre Dame squad who played the game of their lives.  (They 
>    did have LeRon Ellis though ....)
>    
>    Ugh.
    
    In other words, Calipari did such a marvelous job of sandbagging that
    it presented quite a challenge requiring all your creativity for even 
    *you* to outdo him...
    
    glenn
    
77.196GIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Nov 23 1993 15:3918
         I think Nazz left out a couple of important words, when exerpting
    Coach Cal's comments after the Towson game.  I think he said something
    to the effect "we have no chance of winning a game with North Carolina,
    AT THIS TIME OF THE YEAR."  In the articles that I've read in which he
    has spoken of this year's recruits, he absolutely raves about their
    potential, and he admits he has more physical talent on this team than
    on any of its predecessors.
    
         I think he's being realistic, in that, of his current 9 man
    rotation, 4 players are in their first year, and have only fifteen or
    so practices and two games under their belts.
    
    Russ
    
    - a good buddy of mine is a judge in Atlanta, and bleeds baby blue,
      just like ACC Chris.  I think a wager's in order.  What's the spread,
      15 or so?  I should be able to get 20 pts. from hizzoner!
                                                     
77.197UMass should cover easily and could definitely win.RHETT::KNORRDean &gt; WoodenTue Nov 23 1993 16:344
    The line in todays Atlanta Constipation has UNC by 14.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.198I Don't See ItSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Nov 23 1993 18:1015
      I don't think UMass can win and the reason is (of course)
      inexperience.  The best example is Montross versus Camby.
      Now I figure Camby might actually emerge as a better collegiate
      player, but we're talking a guy who has played 2 whole college
      basketball games and is maybe 18 or 19 years old.  And he's
      battling against a guy who has played probably 70+ ACC games
      as well as played an entire NCAA tournament.  Plus he's probably
      a lot heavier partly due to being 22 or so and not 18.
    
      The experience factor should weight heavily.
    
      But, still...behind closed doors, with just my players I'd tell
      them the game is VERY WINNABLE!
    
                                                   Tony
77.199VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesTue Nov 23 1993 19:404
    	If UMASS could beat the talent laden Tar Heels is would surpass
    BC's momentous upset at South Bend last weekend.
    
    				/Don
77.200Carolina to win, but UMass to cover.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Nov 23 1993 19:527
    I gotta agree with Tony on this one.  UMass is every bit Carolina's
    equal in the talent department, but in terms of experience (especially
    the experience of Carolina's HeadMaster, Dean Smith) UNC has a huge
    edge.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.201me and Dean, we watch the lineHBAHBA::HAASSchlegelian DialecticTue Nov 23 1993 20:0010
>                   -< Carolina to win, but UMass to cover. >-

A little lapse there, eh?

So much for the idea that wagering should have no place in college
athletics.

Course, he may have hallucinated Dean sharing a_inside tip with him.

TTom
77.202UNC favored by 14 is laughable ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Nov 23 1993 20:138
    Me and Dean *do* agree that wagering has no place in college athletics,
    and for that reason we like to occasionally point out the folly of it
    all.
    
    HTH,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.203GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Nov 24 1993 11:2342
    Re: 77.200
    
         I think Chris is stretching the bounds of reason a bit when
    making the statement that UMASS is the equal of Carolina in talent.
    Most folks think that Montross, Williams and Salvadori will be NBA
    first rounders after this season, and that Reese and Phelps will go in
    the second round, or at least get a free agent look-see.  On the 
    other side of the ball, UMASS' best player Lou Roe, is too small at
    6'7" to play his natural position of power forward in the pro's, and
    probably lacks the offensive skills to move to small forward in the
    Big Show.  I'm sure he'll at least be invited to camp, but it remains
    questionable whether he'll ever draw an NBA paycheck.  Mike Williams seems 
    destined for Europe or the CBA.
    
         Of the freshmen, it's way too early to make any judgements.  Let's
    just say that none of the recruiting rags rated Calipari's recruits as
    the best class in the country.
    
         I'm hoping that UMASS can make a bit more of a game of it than did
    Cincinnati.
    
    Russ
    
    - actually, IMHO, where UMASS matches up best with Carolina is behind
      the bench.  
                  
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
            
77.204Haven't bought a paper today ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Nov 24 1993 12:006
    Does anyone know if the UMass vs. UNC game is the early or late game?
    
    thanks,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.205GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Nov 24 1993 12:024
         USA Today reports that Michael Williams sprained his ankle on 
    Monday, has been on crutches, and probably will not play tonite.
    
    Russ
77.206GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Nov 24 1993 12:035
    Re: 204
    
         It's the 9:15 p.m. game, Chris.
    
    Russ
77.207NIT on Radio?CSTSY2::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesWed Nov 24 1993 12:1512
    
    
    Yabbut I'm gonna be trekking to Brrrmont tonight and probably won't
    get to the I-L's in time to see the game.  Does anybody know *any*
    radio station that is broadcasting the game?
    
    t.i.a.
    
    I remain,
    ready to gobble
    Kev
    
77.208But it will be a good learning experienceTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthWed Nov 24 1993 13:2713
    UMass had no chance before WIlliams went down.  Now they're gonna
    get slaughtered.  Williams was their best player in their first two
    games.  Now the backcourt consists of Derek Kelleogg, two freshmen, and
    a walk-on.  Carolina will press and UMass will get destroyed.
    
    I predict 114-52 for the Heels.  Dean will remember to put in his bench
    with 45 seconds to go - gotta run up the score to keep the top ranking.
    
    Then the Minutemen travel to Oklahoma on Sunday to meet the Sooners.
    It'll be next to impossible to return after the Thanksgiving break
    and have UMass be anything but 2-2.
    
    NAZZ
77.209Nobody goes off on Derrick. (Just axe VanExcel ...)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Nov 24 1993 13:449
    My guess is that Calipari is pulling a classic LouHoltz and Williams
    will not only play but throw in around 25 first half points before
    Deano puts Derrick Phelps on him and all of a sudden he starts limping
    around like he just got shot or somethin'.
    
    Haw!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.210MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Nov 24 1993 14:066
  So basically, you think Deano is so stupid that it'll take him until half-
 time before he figures (or his assistants figure for him) that he'd better put
 Phelps on Williams? No wonder you don't think Deano with the number one team
 in the country can thoroughly whup outmanned UMass. You're as much as calling
 him incompetent.
77.211I've seen this movie, too.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Nov 24 1993 14:275
    Yes, it will take Deano until halftime to switch
    {our_best_defensive_player} onto {their_best_offensive_player}.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.212UMASS - BUSY T-DAY WEEKENDJUPITR::WCLUETTCOME AROUND TO MY WAY OF THINKING!!!Wed Nov 24 1993 14:358
    UMASS busy the next few days-- remember the consolation game for
    NIT if by chance they do not win, then the Oklahoma game on Sunday!!!
    
    FYI- UMASS is ranked #18... 
    
    Monday Umass will be 4-1... 
    
    /w
77.213Need Some Perimeter PresenceJUNCO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Nov 24 1993 16:398
      I think if you factor in the inexperience with the Williams
      status, it looks really dismal.  That first game, they just
      couldn't hit an outside shot and the only guy doing anything
      from the perimeter was Williams.  It suggests a high probability
      of North Carolina being able to 'pack it in' on defense and get
      away with it.  And if they can do that...FORGET IT.
    
                                                Tony
77.214GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Nov 24 1993 19:5522
         With Williams out, I bet Donta Bright will draw a starting 
    assignment at 2G.  As others have pointed out, during the first two
    games he has displayed the offensive moves necessary to make a shot
    for himself just about whenever he wants.  The problem is he's been
    shooting about 30% both from the field and from the charity stripe!
    With Williams injury, UMASS loses a very creative offensive player,
    one of their best ballhandlers, the team leader in steals on the
    defensive end, and perhaps most importantly, one of their few
    experienced players.
    
         I also think we may see Meyer defensing Montross, with Camby
    playing one of the forward positions.  With Montross weighing in at
    290 lbs. and Camby tipping the scales at 215 lb. after a big
    Thanksgiving meal, that matchup would be no contest.  My biggest
    fear is that Camby will draw three early fouls, the shooting will
    remain poor, and Carolina will start a track meet, not unlike their
    game with URI in the NCAA Tourney.
    
         Given Williams injury, a 30 point loss seems inevitable.
    
    Russ
              
77.215Congrats UMass - a well-deserved 'W'.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Nov 26 1993 01:251
    
77.216GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Nov 29 1993 12:3041
         A wild, wacky, wonderful, roller coaster ride of a weekend for
    the UMASS men's basketball team.  All the positives that go along with
    a four and one record before December 1st, after having played four
    tournament teams including the defending national champ, and Oklahoma
    in Norman, could be washed away depending on the severity of Marcus
    Camby's knee injury.  Reportedly, his knee will be scoped today in
    Worcester.  The MRI over the weekend was inconclusive, however the 
    doctors fear a torn meniscus.
    
         So far, I'm very impressed with the quickness of UMASS both 
    defensively and going to the offensive boards.  Even in the loss to
    Kansas, UMASS was able to throw a couple of nice, counterpunch runs
    at the Jayhawks, both keyed off of defensive intensity.  Ultimately,
    their inability to hit free throws (Lou Roe in particular) cost them
    the game.
    
         Lou Roe has really stepped up his game at the offensive end, and
    is rebounding as well as ever.  Over his first two season's, he's
    better than a 70% free throw shooter, so his disasterous shooting from
    the stripe this year is something of a mystery.  Donta Bright has
    looked great one minute, and totally out of control the next.  He
    clearly needs more practice time and a few more games under his belt.
    Dana Dingle has been very solid ... perhaps the team's most improved
    player.
    
         The backcourt of Derek Kellogg and Mike Williams, with rookies
    Edgar Padilla and Carmelo Travieso, has been pretty solid.  The good
    news is that they are not turning the ball over too much.  Their
    scoring and creativity has been a bit inconsistent.  I am very
    impressed with the play of Edgar Padilla in a back up role at point
    guard.  Defensively, he might have the quickest hands on the team.
    Against Carolina, he stripped either Phelps or Williams, on one 
    occasion as neatly a pickpocket working a NYC subway!  Calipari
    has to find away to get Travieso in the game, and to run an offense
    that will get him some shots.  He's definitely a major league shooter!
    
         Here's hoping for a successful surgery and a rapid convalesence
    for Marcus Camby!
    
    
     
77.217MKFSA::LONGHelp! I've lost my OBL and can't get up!Mon Nov 29 1993 13:085
	After watching the UMASS-UNC game I couldn't help wondering how
	good this team might be if the could only sink a free throw.


	billl
77.218now I only hate him!CSTEAM::FARLEYCarol's wearing maternity clothesMon Nov 29 1993 13:2017
    
    
    		I HATE DICK VITALE'S NON-STOP INCESSANT BABBLING!!!!!
    
    
    Sorry Bernie but I was so absolutely pissed at that *sshole's crap that
    I turned off the game about 5 minutes into the second half.
    
    I'd contribute to the fund to "off" him too!
    
    grrrrrr
    
    I remain,
    thinking UMass might practice free throws a million times
    Kev
    
    
77.219MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 29 1993 13:2410
    
     Edgar Padilla was certainly a pleasant surprise. I expected
    Camby to be good after all the press he's gotten but Padilla
    looks like he could eventually beat Derrick Kellogg out of a 
    job. The kid has great instincts, a nice shooting touch and 
    quickness. And unlike Kellogg, he'll take the open jay. And 
    stick it, too. Although, Kellogg looks like he's a little more 
    relaxed about taking the shot hitting a few treys over the week-
    end. Last year Kellogg wouldn't hoist it up at gun point. Still,
    by next year I'd like to see Padilla as the starting PG.
77.220UMass #9 in CNN pollLEAF::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Nov 29 1993 13:2735
    YYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!
    
    HHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    22 years of agony avenged!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    It's been a long time coming, but it was oh so sweet!  It would be
    ironic, however, if UMass lost freshman sensation Marcus Camby for
    the season to an injury incurred during the greatest basketball
    victory in the school's history.
    
    But back to the game - did John Calipari outcoach the Legend or
    what?!?!?  Please explain to me what sense it made to leve Montross on
    the floor with four fouls and 11 minutes left?!?!?!?!?  And, why sit
    back in a zone with 30 seconds left up by three, allowing Mike Williams
    to get a great look at the basket on his 3-pointer?  Williams has
    cahunas the size of Chicago - he's never afraid to take the big shot!
    
    Which brings me to the seconds victory of the weekend - 84-83 over the
    hated Billy Tubbs AT Norman!!!!!!!!  Donta Bright gets his first start
    as Coach Cal goes with a small line-up (Lou Roe at center), and Bright
    responds with a career high 28 points on 13-15 shooting.  Roe adds 27,
    Derek Kellogg hits three threes among his 11 points for the second game
    in a row, and Mike Williams darts down the baseline for the winning
    layup with 1.2 seconds left in the game!!!
    
    Congrats Minutemen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    NAZZ
    
    PS - 22 years refers to UMass' last meeting with UNC, where Julius
    Erving picked up four fouls in the first half, fouled out with 17
    minutes left in the game, and UNC turned a 37-28 halftime lead into
    an embarrassing 90-49 rout, in case you were wondering. 
77.221Congrats UMassCARTUN::BARRYMon Nov 29 1993 13:3912
    
    
    Great job by UMass (both games) this weekend.
    
    I've got to believe that this winter's sports season is going to be
    dependent on the colleges to provide any entertainment at all. Judging
    from the way the Celtics and Bruins have been playing, and the disarray
    that the Red Sox are in, the college basketball scene is going to get a
    lot of press time.
    
    
    
77.222Drop Those Free Throws!!STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Nov 29 1993 15:5511
    re .217
    
    Amazing.  Had they hit their free throws, the NC game would have
    been an absolute BLOWOUT!!!
    
    I was unable to see the Oklahome game.  How did Bright look?  What
    kind of shots was he taking?  Was he basically unstoppable??
    
    Oh man...I sure hope Camby is ok.
    
                                                    Tony
77.223Re: 77.222GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Nov 29 1993 16:0911
         Don't forget that UNC wasn't a whole lot better from the free
    throw line last Wednesday night.  UMASS went 24-42 and Carolina hit
    27 out of 43, subpar shooting for both teams.
    
         Supposedly, Donta Bright hit numerous follow-ups and tip ins
    of missed shots, on the offensive boards against Oklahoma, including
    two tip ins during the last 90 seconds.
    
    Russ
    
    - ditto on Camby
77.224PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 29 1993 16:122
    I didn't realize Camby's injury was that serious.  Friday morning's
    paper said it was just a bruise.
77.225get the big guy out there anyway possible...CNTROL::CHILDSI am airless, a vacuum childMon Nov 29 1993 16:226
 IMO, it was a cheap legwhip by Phelphs that injuried him too....

 course dean wouldn't teach dirty play now would he???????

 mike
77.226Calipari sandbags Williams, but ACC Chris called it!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Nov 29 1993 17:3947
    Some ramblings:
    
    o Nazz is correct in pointing out that this is the biggest win in
      UMass basketball history.  Of course, practically any team that
      beats UNC out-of-conference could make the same claim, and for some
      in-conference schools a season can be made just by beating Carolina.  
      Face it folks, if Carolina wins it's just another win.  If they lose, 
      it's party-time.  
    
      Reminds me of some Celtics dynasty stories.  When the C's would win
      they'd just walk off the court as if business had been taken care of.
      In fact, Red used to tell 'em that, after a game, act like you
      *expected* to win.
    
    o UMass outplayed, outhustled, outcoached, and outrebounded Carolina.
      Forget about the bad foul shooting for the Minutemen, cause UNC's
      was just as bad.  Senior forward Brian Reese clanged his last 4
      attempts.  Even Donald clanged a couple.
    
    o Donta Bright looked awfully good to me.  Roe was on a mission. 
      UMass's backcourt didn't crack.  Our huge frontline got absolutely
      destroyed on the defensive glass, causing UNC fans to recall with
      fond memory George Lynch's blue collar approach to rebounding.
    
    o Forget about not taking Montross out.  That was pure Dean almost
      hoping the AA *would* foul out so he could give crunch-time minutes
      to less experienced players.  Forget also our lack of going for the
      jugular after starting the game 11-0.  Dean's always gonna sub alot
      in the 1st half.
    
      However the decision to go zone up 3 was inexplicable.  I commented
      on this after the Western Kentucky game, only this time it was even
      more bizarre.  A very bad decision - without a 3-point shot at that
      point in the game UMass, in all likelihood, comes away with an 'L'.
    
    o Dean always says you can learn just as much from a win as a loss, so
      it's tough to put a positive spin on the game except to say at least
      we didn't suffer any injuries.  (No cheap shot intended, Minutemain
      fans.) 
    
      Fortunately the ship got righted and 'The Donald' poured in 28 to
      knock off Top 10 Minnesota in a game I know virtually nothing about.
      (Nothing in the paper 'sept for a one-sentence 'article', no box score,
      no TV.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.227Pitino on UMASSDYPSS1::ROPERMAC IS BACK!Tue Nov 30 1993 12:388
    Rick Pitino praised UMASS on his weekly coaches show last night.  He
    said that he thought UMASS was the best offensive rebounding team he'd
    seen in the last ten years.  
    
    Looking forward to UK meeting UMASS this February!  Should be a great
    game.
    
    - Rope
77.228VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesTue Nov 30 1993 16:4813
77.229Free Throws/Camby/BrightESKIMO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Nov 30 1993 17:2122
      re 223 and ACC Chris' reply (forget which number)
    
      Yeah, you guys are absolutely right on the free throw thing.
      I didn't realize NC clanged as many as they did and I would
      expect generally a NC team to shoot better at the stripe than
      UMass so given the actual stats, the free throw state actually
      favored UMass.
    
      Two other things...
    
      Any more news on Camby?
    
      Chris, was it your reply awhile back that said Bright looked awful?
      What do you think now (serious)?  Do you think maybe it was just
      inexperience?  Think he's looking like he'll be a real force?
      I HOPE so!  
    
      Come to think of it...Dean Smith mentioned favoring an 8-deep team
      rather than too many deep.  Sounds good to me!  UMass is solid at
      least to 8 people.
    
                                                 Tony
77.230Saw UNC play in the Boston Garden too, BTW.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Nov 30 1993 17:4320
    re: Tony
    
    It wasn't me who said Bright looked bad.  I thought he looked awfully
    good for a kid who supposedly couldn't lead his intramural team to a
    Title.  (Ha!  Forget who told me that story, BTW ...)
    
    
    re: /Don (banners)
    
    Obviously you haven't been to the DeanDome.  The rafters are chalk-full
    of banners and retired numbers.  On the other hand, I *have* been to
    that hell-hole called 'The Boston Garden' (easily rates as the *worst*
    SPORTS facilities I've ever been in, although admittedly the place the
    Pats play is awful bad) and when I look up at the roof all I see are
    stupid Boston Bruins divisional banners, like anybody really cares.
    
    Haw!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.231LAGUNA::MAY_BRAll products 100% buzzword compliantTue Nov 30 1993 18:181
    stupid Boston Bruin Divisional banners=ACC champ banners
77.232Bravo Brews. Great minds think alike.VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReevesTue Nov 30 1993 20:051
    
77.233with a baby blue streakHBAHBA::HAASSchlegelian DialecticTue Nov 30 1993 20:147
Here we have a leetle banner banter and I get slurred along with the rest
of the conference. 

Knorr would get excited if they put Dean's boxers in the rafters of his
Dome. 

TTom
77.234Camby UpdateGIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Dec 02 1993 19:3016
         In case anyone missed the newspaper reports this morning, the
    arthroscopy performed on Marcus Camby's knee revealed nothing more
    than a bone bruise.  Boston Red Sox Team Physician Arthur Pappas
    performed the surgery.  It is expected that he will return to the UMASS
    lineup in time for the Abdow's Holiday Tournament in Springfield on
    December 28th and 29th.  Participants in that Tourney will be UMASS,
    Hartford, Hofstra and Maryland.  During the interim, he will miss
    games with St.Bonaventure, Central Connecticut, Holy Cross, and an
    exhibition game with an International Team.  
    
         A huge sigh of relief was heard echoing through the halls of the
    Mullins Center, emanating from the office of John Calipari!;^)
    
    Russ
        
     
77.235Great News!!STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Dec 03 1993 13:479
      re -1
    
      Yeah, I caught that news brief in the Globe sports today.
      Needless to say, I was relieved!
    
      By the way, the Atlantic 10 once again flexed some muscle
      as Temple beat then #2 Kansas convincingly *in* Kansas.
    
                                             Tony
77.236That Hartford XMAS tourney "still going"?AKOCOA::BREENOh Come Ollie MatsonTue Dec 07 1993 15:026
    I believe that xmas tourney in Hartford where in circa '75 Cornbread
    Maxwell and Robert Parrish met in a NC Charlotte/Centenary game won by
    NC.  I believe it was the season prior to NCC making the NCAA semis and
    their classic tilt with Marquette.
    
    Bill
77.237UNC-C reaching the Final4 was a true CinderellaStoryRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Dec 07 1993 15:308
    The Cornbread-led 49ers made the Final4 in '77 ('L' to Marquette in a
    game they should've won), so placing them in a '75 Christmas tourney
    one (1) season prior sounds correct.
    
    Who won the game?
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.238GIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Dec 07 1993 15:5112
    RE.  .236 & .237
    
         During December of 1974, the Springfield, Ma. Hall of Fame
    Tournament featured Dartmouth, UNC-Charlotte, Centenary and UMASS
    as host.  UMASS won the opener over Dartmouth 74-59, but then was
    trashed one night later by UNC Charlotte by a score of 85-57.  I don't 
    know the score of the UNC Charlotte - Centenary game.
    
         I remember knowing at the time of Robert Parish, and expecting
    to see a UMASS-Centenary matchup.  I was unfamiliar with Cedric
    Maxwell.  As I recall UNC-C absolutely dominated a perimeter oriented
    UMASS team, by controlling the boards at both ends.
77.239MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Wed Dec 08 1993 01:297
    re: .237
    
    Didn't UNC also lose a game they should have won to Marquette in the
    1977 NCAA's??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.240'77 no upset hereAKOCOA::BREENWaite Hoyt and Tom UmphlettWed Dec 08 1993 14:3413
    Marquette beat NC in the final but I personally never considered that
    an upset.  In fact I recall that NC beat ND in the other semi and that
    was a mild upset and in fact a late comeback won it for the heels.
    
    I always liked that Laimbeer,Tripucka, Tracey Jackson, Hanzlik bunch
    but was a minority of one in a crowd of upwards of 6 or 7 basket fans
    who hated the notredame hype.
    
    As I recall there was a guard, Jimmy Boylan(I hope I got that right)
    who had a tremendous ncaa tourney for Al McGuire.
    
    And how did Al ever get phased out of doing the college hoops - he was
    far and away the best ever at that "color" thing
77.241Another exellent lossBSS::MENDEZWed Dec 08 1993 14:477
    RE: -1  Are you sure?  I thought that was the year that UNC beat a
    good UNLV squad and Marquette lucked out on a last second shot to
    advance to the finals.  I also thought that UNC was favored over
    Marquette...  In the words of Mr T. "It was an exellent loss for
    snuffy smith".
    
    Frank Mendez
77.242More ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 08 1993 15:0319
    UNC had to beat Notre Dame *IN SOUTH BEND*, ..... *** ON ST. PATRICK'S
    DAY!!! ***, ...... just to reach the Final4.  
    
    This team had no business reaching the finals (in Atlanta) in the first
    place.  Walter Davis was playing with a broken finger, our center was
    OUT (Tommy LeGarde, who played a lot of years in the NBA), and Phil
    Ford hyperextended his elbow early in the tourney and was never at full
    strength.
    
    Nevertheless Carolina knocked off UNLV in a wild affair before losing
    to Marquette in Al McGuire's last game.
    
    BTW, the last-second shot by Marquette to beat UNC-C was a full-court
    pass that was laid in by Jerome Whitehaid with only a couple of ticks
    left on the clock.  UNC-C was up by a point and poised to win the
    game.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.243shoulda wonHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropWed Dec 08 1993 15:1013
The answer to the question is YES.

No Carolina was favored to beat Marquette. This was with full recognition
of any and all problems the Heels may or may not have had. Everyone knew
the physical status of the baby blue team and judged that the state
University of No Carolina at Chapel Hill *SHOULD* beat Marquette.

The Excuse Bible would have you believe that no one this side of the
Carolina Blue knew anything about the physical status of the players and
that now we're supposed to apply historical revisionism and ignore the
very splendid choke job.

TTom
77.244Just about the time Al started smilin'CNTROL::CHILDSJ. Elders, you got it RIGHT Babeee!!Wed Dec 08 1993 16:034
 Don't forget the excellent coaching decision to go 4-corners.....

 mike
77.245Digger's best friend...himselfCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 08 1993 17:5013
    Thanks for remindin' me of another underachieving Digger-led
    Irish squad, there Chris.
    
    However my opinion could change a bit if'n someone *neutral*
    could tell me who was favored in that ND-UNC game at ND?
    Was ND's chances for the champeenship that year considered
    good? Ah honestly have blocked it from mah memory ( like the
    '73 or '74 Irish squad losing to Michigan the same year NCState
    beat Marquette, the ND team that let Danny Ainge do the fandango
    through, the Kuharich and Faust years...).
    
    MikeL
    
77.246@ ND (on St. Paddy's Day) and we're a favorite?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 08 1993 18:1011
    > However my opinion could change a bit if'n someone *neutral*
    > could tell me who was favored in that ND-UNC game at ND?
    
    Finding that "neutral" person could be a tough nut, MikeL.  Most folk
    in this conference who are likely to offer "expert" advise on the
    subject have yet to consider North Carolina a 'dog for *any* game!
    
    Ha!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.247CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 08 1993 18:147
    All we need Chris is someone with "The Line" on the game in '77
    Be tough to find, but I'll believe that. Ain't doubtin' ya, but
    ah needs to know so's I can keep that 30th dart in mah picture
    of Richard Phelps
    
    MikeL
    
77.248DECWET::METZGERAmerica's most beloved game show hostWed Dec 08 1993 18:148
What would being on St Paddys day mean to a bunch of african-american students?

It's stupid unless they're handing out free beer to the students before th
game..


Metz
77.249give it upHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropWed Dec 08 1993 18:1612
No Carolina has been a dog on several occasions but it happens about as
often as Florida St getting points in football.

In the Laettner hay-day at Duke, the Heels were getting points at Durham.

What this is trying to imply, however, conveniently without addressing
the real issue, is that No Carolina wasn't favored to beat Marquette
cause, well, y'all know all them excuseful reasons.

Save it, Chris. The Heels were favored and they choked.

TTom
77.250CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 08 1993 18:176
    Who sdays they was all AA's??
    
    And it wasn't free beer.. but nickel green beer comes close.
    
    MikeL
    
77.251CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 08 1993 18:199
    TTom,
    
    I certainly remember UNC being favored over Marquette, there's no
    denying that. I'm just looking to reinforce a belief_a_my own
    regarding ND and Digger.
    
    MikeL
    
    
77.252calling CapHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropWed Dec 08 1993 18:204
As to who was favored, perhaps the Dean of anti-Dean stats, Cap, might
know.

TTom
77.253couldn't resistBSS::MENDEZWed Dec 08 1993 18:266
    re: .246
    
    Hey Chris I'd call the tarheels dogs!!!!!!^8
    
    Frank Mendez
    
77.254MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 08 1993 18:362
 And all of this has exactly *what* to do with "UMass Athletics"?
77.255You positioning to be a mod??CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Dec 08 1993 18:401
    
77.256CNTROL::CHILDSJ. Elders, you got it RIGHT Babeee!!Wed Dec 08 1993 18:569
It helps put things in perspective for UMASS fans. mainly that beating UNC
ain't no big deal. lesser teams have been doing it for years......

haw! haw!

mike
    

77.257MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Dec 08 1993 18:573
  No, I don't want to be a mod although you lollipops sorely need it. If'n
 I were a mod I'd make Mac look like a pushover.
77.258could do it in a minute, manHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropWed Dec 08 1993 19:424
Hail, Tommy, take a tip from Chris Knorr. Talk and act like you actually
are a moderator.

TTom
77.259this is sports isn't it?????BSS::MENDEZWed Dec 08 1993 19:485
    Hey I thought this was the sports notes where just about anything
    goes???????
    
    Frank
    
77.260PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 08 1993 19:565
77.261CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdWed Dec 08 1993 20:226
>    
>    You've been gone a long time, haven't you Frank.  Please check through
>    Topic 2 (I think) for conference and corporate policies and procedures.
>

And if ANYONE in here follows them, I'm the Queen of England......
77.262Tea and Crumpet anyonePTOVAX::JACOBIt happened again!!!!!!Wed Dec 08 1993 20:247
    Well I, for one, follow them.
    
    How's yer son, Charlie, yer majesty???
    
    
    JaKe
    
77.263MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Dec 09 1993 00:306
    Well, Tommy, the UNC discussion belongs here as much as that
    Pats discussion belonged in the Steelers note - I'm pretty sure
    you were a long-winded participant in that discussion.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.264PTOVAX::JACOBIt happened again!!!!!!Thu Dec 09 1993 00:339
    
    >>Well, Tommy, the UNC discussion belongs here as much as that
    >>Pats discussion belonged in the Steelers note - I'm pretty sure
    
    Not to mention that FANTASTIC (yawn) literary discussion in the JaJ
    note, too.
    
    JaKe
    
77.265Like puttin' a square peg in a round hole 8^)CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Dec 09 1993 10:476
    Correct JaKe,
    Anythang literary in the JAJ note must be anathema, no?
    
    8^)
    MikeL
    
77.266MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Dec 09 1993 12:0014
 >> Well, Tommy, the UNC discussion belongs here as much as that
 >> Pats discussion belonged in the Steelers note - I'm pretty sure
 >> you were a long-winded participant in that discussion.
   
    At least the Pats discussion came about because of a game against
    the Steelers. This discussion came about because of a question about
    a tourney in Hartford that had nothing to do with UMass. UMass hasn't 
    played any of the teams being discussed for the last thirty replies 
    here except UNC and that was three weeks ago. What's more is I ain't 
    saying that I'm not guilty of the same behavior, Hulkster, just pointing
    out that it's in the wrong place. If Jake had done that in the Steelers 
    note he'd have been well within his rights.
  
77.267UMass schedule the rest of DecemberTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthThu Dec 09 1993 17:5910
    Back to the topic:
    
    UMASS plays its only breather on its schedule tonight when Central
    Connecticut comes to the Mullins Center for a thrashing.  Saturday
    night the Minutemen will punish the Crusaders of Holy Cross for past
    indescretions, then they play some international squad at Mullins next
    Wednesday.  After that, it's R&R time until the Abdow's classic after
    Christmas, when Marcus Camby may be ready to return to action.
    
    NAZZ
77.268CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdThu Dec 09 1993 19:0510
My Alma Mater will get their asses handed to them I'm afraid.

It all started when they moved the anatomically correct Blue Devil (nice
package) out of the Student Center, in favor of an abstract sculpture
representing the Blue Devil.

No doubt bowing to pressure to be "politically correct"....8^(


'Saw
77.269CCSU tried for 40 minutesTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Dec 10 1993 13:5810
    'Saw, your Blue Devils did you proud.  THey almost won the second half,
    losing by a single point.  THey have some talent - a shifty little PG
    who can shoot, a bulky Rooskie who hit 5 3-pointers, and a couple of
    decent wing players.  UMass did toy with them for most of the game, but
    if they compete at their level, they'll win some games.
    
    Doesn't get any easier for them - they play UConn tomorrow night at
    Gampel.  You gonna catch that game, 'Saw?
    
    NAZZ
77.270CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Dec 10 1993 14:0323
>
>    'Saw, your Blue Devils did you proud.  THey almost won the second half,
>    losing by a single point.  THey have some talent - a shifty little PG
>    who can shoot, a bulky Rooskie who hit 5 3-pointers, and a couple of
>    decent wing players.  UMass did toy with them for most of the game, but
>    if they compete at their level, they'll win some games.

Now, see, if they moved the anatomically correct Blue Devil statue BACK
into the Student Center, CCSU might have won!  8^)
    
>    Doesn't get any easier for them - they play UConn tomorrow night at
>    Gampel.  You gonna catch that game, 'Saw?
    
I think they have CCSU at the Civic Center in the afternoon.  My brother
has tickets as part of his package, but UNFORTUNATELY, he's chosen to
take a girl instead of me.  Can you imagine that?  My own brother dissin'
me for some girl who probably don't know nothin' 'bout hoops....8^)


Look for a BIG UCONN win.....


'Saw
77.271Seems like an unthinking act for a brother to doTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Dec 10 1993 14:064
    Does he need the lure of college basketball to acquire female
    companionship?
    
    NAZZ
77.272CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Dec 10 1993 14:1220
>    Does he need the lure of college basketball to acquire female
>    companionship?
    
No.  

I think it's more akin to what Maverick said in 'Top Gun'


	I had the shot, there was no danger, so I took.



The opportunity presented itself, and it seems fairly obvious to me that
he must figure that he's got a fairly good chance of her expressing
her appreciation in new and unusual (or even old and tried and true) ways.

For that, I'll forgive him -- maybe......


'Saw
77.273Score a deuce for 'Saw's bro.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Dec 10 1993 14:158
    For you brothers sake 'Saw it's encouraging that a girl would want to
    go to a college hoops game (i.e. shows good taste).  And in his
    defense, you yourself have admitted you don't know squat 'bout college
    hoops, although one would think you've received a purty good education
    over the last few years.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.274CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Dec 10 1993 14:3018
>
>    For you brothers sake 'Saw it's encouraging that a girl would want to
>    go to a college hoops game (i.e. shows good taste).  And in his
>    defense, you yourself have admitted you don't know squat 'bout college
>    hoops, although one would think you've received a purty good education
>    over the last few years.
    
    
You've got a good point.

I guess I won't say that I don't know squat about college hoops, but I'm 
not a huge follower of college hoops.

At any rate, if my bro' can score a trey on Saturday, more power to him!

8^)


77.275PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Dec 10 1993 14:567
77.276CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Dec 10 1993 15:0611
>    
>    And after all those software and computer shows you took him to as
>    well.  What an ingrate.
>

Yeah, and after doing all his software installations for him too.

I'll tell you, hormones is stronger than blood these days.....


'Saw
77.277haunted by his past.....CSTEAM::FARLEYFri Dec 10 1993 15:0721
    
    
>>    Does he need the lure of college basketball to acquire female
      companionship?
    
      NAZZ
    
    
    Yabbut how 'bout these 'trons?
    
    	"Nazz, Does he need the lure of Celtic basketball to acquire female
    	companionship?"
    
    i.e. - Annual Lap Sitting Contest
    
    <major grins>
    
    I remain,
    nevah one to enter that contest!
    Kev
    
77.278PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Dec 10 1993 15:102
    'Saw I told you that you shoulda been watching rugby instead of going
    to those silly software things.
77.279CAM3::WAYYou can't polish a turdFri Dec 10 1993 15:158
>    'Saw I told you that you shoulda been watching rugby instead of going
>    to those silly software things.

Well, they helped me out anyway.....


'Saw

77.280With one raise in 15 years, I need other benniesTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Dec 10 1993 16:225
    Kev - I'm always on the lookout fer young ladies interested in a
    tryout.  Special hours can be arranged.  (Nudge, nudge, wink, wink,
    know what I mean?)
    
    NAZZ
77.281Why is _____ afraid to play ______?USCTR1::BARRYTue Dec 14 1993 21:1028
    
    
    Any thoughts on the comments made by the coaches of UMass and BC
    basketball about whether or not they'll play one another anytime soon?
    
    Seems John Calipari is quoted in the Globe as saying, "Well, the shoe's
    on the other foot now. The game then was for New England basketball,
    and when you thought about it, it seemed like a good idea then...We
    used to be the threat, but what's happened now is that we're not the
    threat anymore; they're a threat to us."
    
    Apparently, when BC had something to loose by playing an improving
    UMass team, it was "a good idea." Now that UMass is, and I admit it,
    clearly the better team, Calipari says, "I just don't know if it's a
    good game for us to play."
    
    BC coach Jim O'Brien echoed what Calipari said, "I really have no
    interest in playing them. Just because UMass has gotten good, now
    people want us to play them?"
    
    Any thoughts? In the past I've read in this note about how BC was
    "chicken" to play UMass. While O'Brien's comments may lead one to
    believe that that hasn't changed, what about what Calipari is saying?
    
    Any comments....?
    
    
    
77.282Re: 77.281GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Dec 15 1993 11:4119
         It appears to me that John Calipari is being a bit vindictive
    these days, in his attitude about scheduling BC or UCONN in basketball.
    From the recent Globe article and in interviews as far back as just
    after the 30-5 season of two years ago, he seems to be saying that
    "BC and UCONN snubbed us when we were on the way up, so the hell with
    them now".  Clearly, substituting BC/UCONN today, for any of Kentucky, 
    Florida State or Cincinnati, would, if anything, weaken UMASS' non-
    conference schedule, so its not really an issue of being afraid to play 
    the BE schools.  In my opinion, Calipari would schedule Da Bulls or the 
    Supersonics, if ESPN or ABC would agree to put him on television.
    
         Just being a fan of college basketball, I would love to see yearly
    games involving UMASS, UCONN, and BC, on a neutral site such as the
    Worcester Centrum if need be.  The three schools compete in just about
    every men and women's sport except football and basketball.  It's time
    the basketball rivalry was reinstituted.
    
    Russ 
           
77.283UMass-UConn - yes; UMass-BC - noTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthThu Dec 16 1993 19:2821
    As a UMass alum, I have no interest in seeing UMass play BC.  The game
    is a no-win proposition for the Minutemen - if they win, they were
    supposed to win; if they lose, they're the farmers from the western
    part of the state and they're just basketball frauds.  Until BC
    upgrades their non-Big East schedule, they should remain a second
    class basketball citizen in Massachusetts.
    
    As for UConn, I'd love to see that annual matchup, but Jim Calhoun
    (wisely) still wants no part of UMass.  For his part, Calipari is 
    still miffed that UConn chose not to fill an open date last year 
    with UMass and open the Mullins center in style, but Coach Cal should 
    forget that snub and think of basketball first.  The UMies may be better 
    than UConn right now, but the talent level is relatively close. 
    Calhoun resents the fact that Calipari has recruited several prize 
    prospects out of Connecticut right under his nose.  However, UConn's
    basketball tradition would be a nice contrast to UMass' recent
    success.  If they met once a year at alternating sites, it would be
    great for New England and great for college basketball in general.
    
    NAZZ
    
77.284METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Dec 16 1993 19:513
And ESPN would love it as well - heh heh

The Crazy Met
77.285Here's one thoughtAKOCOA::BREENSal Conigliaro-ohThu Dec 16 1993 20:014
    How about a mini big east - atlantic 10 challenge with bc,prov/uconn vs
    RI-umass-rutgers played at prov or centrum
    
    
77.286Dream onTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Dec 17 1993 16:093
    Makes too much sense, so it'll never happen!
    
    NAZZ
77.287 UMass/BCUSCTR1::BARRYMon Dec 20 1993 12:4726
    
    
    Nazz,
    
    The shoe really is on the other foot now, isn't it.
    
    When BC was acknowledged as the better of the two, the prevailing
    sentiment was that BC should play UMass and that BC was afraid to get
    it on. Now BC is "unworthy" to play UMass.
    
    Your logic may be correct, but your words sound an awful lot like what
    was said in Chestnut Hill in the past.
     
    The fact of the matter is that teams with something to gain in terms of
    local recruiting will always call for a game with the premier team in
    their recruiting "homeland." In this case, UMass should be commended.
    BC avoided playing them for years hoping they would simply be a flash
    in the pan. They aren't. Calipari has done a superlative job recruiting
    in the Connecticut/New York/Rest of New England area. He's done a very
    good job with the talent once he's landed it, too.
    
    What's interesting is that BC doesn't feel it has anything to gain from
    playing UMass. Recent recruiting results would seem to bear this out.
    BC has recruited weel this year. No Marcus Camby's, but they're doing
    OK.
    
77.288Rivalries, even bad-blood rivalries, are the crux of sportsNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 20 1993 12:5711
    
    I think that more neutral fans from the region who really don't have
    the knowledge of the political history of this in-state feud between
    UMass and BC (and maybe some who do) would like to see this game on a 
    yearly basis.  I'm not all that turned on by Big East or Atlantic-10
    basketball per se but I'd be very interested in this matchup.  If both
    of these schools remain as nationally ranked teams it makes too much
    sense not to do it, and a lost opportunity if they don't...
    
    glenn
      
77.289UMass vs. BC definitely a game that needs to be played.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Dec 20 1993 13:477
    > Rivalries, even bad-blood rivalries, are the crux of sports
    
    You said a mouf-full there, Waugamain.  And the bad-blood doesn't get
    any worse than Duke/UNC, located a mere 8 miles apart.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.290What fun is it beatin' up on wooses?TNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Dec 20 1993 17:424
    I gots no interest in seeing My State U play those pretty boys
    from Chestnut Hill.
    
    NAZZ
77.291TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Mon Dec 20 1993 17:595
C'mon NAZZ,
Has it been that long since you beat up a wuss?
Sometimes it can be quite pleasurable!

dr.a
77.292GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Dec 29 1993 14:5910
         UMASS defeated the University of Hartford by a score of 91-62
    last evening to advance to the finals of the Hall of Fame Tournament
    in Springfield.  They will meet the Maryland Terrapins who knocked
    off Hofstra in their semifinal by a similarly lopsided score.
    
         The Minutemen were bolstered by the return of freshman phenom
    Marcus Camby, who scored 13 points and blocked 8 shots, in just over
    15 minutes of PT!
    
    Russ
77.293travestyHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropWed Dec 29 1993 15:415
Get in here Nazz and apologize for UMass playing Hartford.

Only cause you be raggin on St. John's for their pitiful opponents.

TTom
77.294On TV???STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Dec 29 1993 17:035
      Is tonights UMass/Maryland game on TV?
    
      Good to see Camby back!!
    
                                           Tony
77.295CNTROL::CHILDSDan Reeves mental midgetWed Dec 29 1993 17:595
 If you can pick up channel 22 out of springfield the game is on at 8:30...
 I know I'll be watching cause 22's on my cable....

 mike
77.296GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Dec 30 1993 13:4832
         UMASS knocked off another of the weak sisters on its girlie-mon
    schedule ;^), as it defeated the 7 and 1 Maryland Terrapins, by a 
    94 to 80 score in Springfield last night to win the Abdow's HOF
    Tourney.  The Minutemen can pull off a noteworthy ACC Trifecta on 
    February 3rd in Amherst, if they can defeat Charlie Ward and the Fla.
    St. Seminoles at the Mullins Center!
    
         The big guns for the UM'ies last night were Lou Roe (30 pts., 8
    rebs., 4 blocks) and Tourney MVP Mike Williams (25 pts., 10 assts, 7
    rebs.)  Freshman Joe Smith led Maryland with 22 pts.  Cousins Donta
    Bright and Keith Booth, did little to help their respective teams,
    as Bright talleyed 4 pts for UMASS, and Booth was held to 2 points
    for Maryland.   Marcus Camby with 12 blocked shots in the two games
    and Dana Dingle (17 pts. last night) both made nice contributions for
    the Minutemen.
    
         With an average of 24 pts. and just under 10 rebounds a game, 
    there can not be too many power forwards in the land playing better
    b-ball than Lou Roe.  It's hard to believe that the one college
    basketball reference I have close at hand (Sporting News College
    B-ball Preview) lists him as the 17th best power forward in the land,
    behind people like Billy Curley, Devin Gray, Jeff Webster, and
    Dana Jones (who?).  I wouldn't mind Bill Curley on my team, but
    Jeff Webster?  Roe saves his best games for quality opponents,
    the mark of a true competitor.
    
    Russ
    
    - the ride home from Springfield, in last night's moderate snowstorm
      was exciting.  Having tandem trailors going by at 65 mph on the Pike, 
      when visibility is down to about 10', makes for a thrilling late
      evening!  
77.297Complaint for the day...KALVIN::MORGANThu Dec 30 1993 14:127
    Thanks for the update, Russ.  I only caught the score on the radio this
    morning.  When is a Boston tv station (or Ch. 27 in Worcester for that
    matter) gonna throw a little support around the most exciting basketball 
    team (pro included) in New England, and show a game now and then?  The 
    lack of publicity this team gets from the Boston media is sickening.
    
    					Steve
77.298Roe is Big Time, 'specially at Crunch Time.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Dec 30 1993 15:4415
    Russ,
    
    I hear ya on Lou Roe.  Reminds me of the traveling All-Star team Donald
    Williams played on this summer.  The coach (who I'd never heard of) was
    starting and giving maximum playing time to some 2G I'd never heard of. 
    Basically The Donald, fresh from a Final4 MVP award, was sitting behind
    some stiff!
    
    And if there was any thought that Williams was somehow a fluke, forget
    about it.  He's picked up this year exactly where he left off last
    year.  Namely, with as sweet as stroke as you'll see, with a knack for
    knocking down shots at crunch time.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.299VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolThu Dec 30 1993 15:484
    	ACC, please don't sully the UMASS note with your incessant BabyBlue
    chatter!
    
    				/Don
77.300The thanks I git for paying UMass a compliment. Shesh. :^(RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Dec 30 1993 15:531
    
77.301VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolThu Dec 30 1993 16:074
77.302:^oRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Dec 30 1993 16:387
    /Don it's people like you that start unknown stiff's ahead of Carolina
    Blue All-American's like Donald Williams.
    
    Huff, huff, huff, puff.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.303VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolThu Dec 30 1993 17:474
    	So ACC, are you saying that North Carolina has talent?  Dare you
    say a plethora of talent?  Dare you say Final Four talent?
    
    				/Don
77.304If UNC stays healthy we'll be in the hunt come March.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Dec 30 1993 18:0511
    What newspaper have you been sleeping under, /Don?  I've admitted we've
    got talent - lots of it.  Dean has too - in fact he laments that we've
    got "too much" this year.  Heh heh!
    
    We've got Final4 talent all right, but like me/Dean always say, ya
    gotta be both lucky and good come NCAA Tourney time.  One Derrick
    Phelps ankle turn, one broken bone on Williams' shooting hand, one game
    day flu by Eric Montross, .....  and it's see ya later.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.305very one dimensionalHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropThu Dec 30 1993 18:2410
>    gotta be both lucky and good come NCAA Tourney time.  One Derrick
>    Phelps ankle turn, one broken bone on Williams' shooting hand, one game
>    day flu by Eric Montross, .....  and it's see ya later.

You seem to be stuck on the same page of the Excuse Bible.

You forgot to mention that stuff about the other team being hot, having
a_end o' year peak, etc., et.al., et.tu....

TTom
77.306and......CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Dec 30 1993 18:279
    
    Yabbut did anybody mention the "academic exam effect" either?
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain
    lucky 'cause I just found another $.02!
    Kev
    
77.307Tsk Tsk TskWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNumber 3 Looms over FenwayThu Dec 30 1993 18:287
    
    
       ....also forget to mention TIMEOUT, Freddy Brown... etc..
    
    
    
    Chappy
77.308VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWorldCup-BetterThanNytolThu Dec 30 1993 18:385
    	ACC you slay me!  Starting excuses for a possible March Madness
    choke and it's still 1993.  I wish You/Dean a Happy New Year, 'cuz once
    March rolls around, if there's no Freddy Brown/Chris Webber...
    
    				/Don
77.309RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Dec 30 1993 18:424
    Yea but /Don, but what if there *is* a Freddy Brown/Chris Webber....
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.310Want some camoflauge paint?CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Dec 30 1993 18:5724
    
    re: "that killer schedule really slays me."
    
    Yabbut NAZZ,
    
    	Excuse me but could you kindly explain (your way out of this) what
    Central Connecticut State was doing playing UMASS?  I'm sure it was an
    oversight on your part to forget that lasted year they were 8-19.
    
    	Whether or not this is fair, even though this is conference
    opponent, St. Bonaventure (0-14 lasted year) might also be considered
    part of your "pot calling the kettle black" stuff.
    
    	IMO, you're just jealous cause SJU gets more press coverage in one
    day (cause they're in the "capital of basketball- NYC) than the UMass
    Minute<politically OK gender description> does all season.  Don't
    despare, my condolences.
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    kinda skeered of those Central CT. teams too  (NOT!)
    Kev
    
77.311Congrats to BC for beating LIU and Coppin St!TNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Jan 03 1994 17:429
    Let's get real here.  UMass' non-conference schedule includes the
    playing the following teams this year:  North Carolina, Kansas,
    Oklahoma, Maryland, DePaul, Cincinnati, Kentucky, and Florida State.
    No Big East team plays anywhere near this tough a schedule.  And,
    out of all those games, only Florida State is at the Mullins Center.
    
    UMass doesn't need to apologize to anyone for who they play.
    
    NAZZ 
77.312Interuder Alert!!!!!CSTEAM::FARLEYMon Jan 03 1994 17:499
    
    
    <--------
    
    
    
    Yabbut hoozat?  The 1994 kindler_and_Gentler NAZZ?????
    
    
77.313A sensitive, 90's kinda guyTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Jan 03 1994 17:513
    Dat's ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    NAZZ
77.314GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Jan 05 1994 12:0214
         UMASS escaped from Piscataway last night with a solid, if
    uninspired, 71-59 victory over the Rutgers Scarlet Knights.  Lou
    Roe led the way with 20 points, and super frosh Marcus Camby added
    13 points, 8 rebounds and 8, count them, 8 blocked shots.  Camby
    could very well be leading the nation in blocked shots per game, 6 games 
    into his collegiate career!
    
         Next up are two difficult road games at Duquesne and West
    Virginia.  Duquesne might have the best center that no one has ever
    heard of in Derrick Alston, and West Virginia in Morgantown, is
    always tough.  Duquesne stands at 6 and 3, and West Virginia at 6 and
    1, prior to last evenings competition.
    
    Russ
77.315Eight Blocks Too Low???ESKIMO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Jan 05 1994 15:116
      I read the Worcestor Telegram this morning and Calipari really
      praised Camby's play.  He also was chuckling over the Camby 
      blocked shot stat-line saying that he had AT LEAST twelve blocks
      in that game!!
    
                                                   Tony
77.316KALI::MORGANWed Jan 05 1994 16:133
    Is West Viginia in the Big East conference in basketball as well?
    
    					Steve
77.317nopeCSTEAM::FARLEYWed Jan 05 1994 16:241
    
77.318No Support From Boston GlobeSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Jan 06 1994 19:264
      By the way, did anyone note the coverage of the UMass/Rutgers
      game in the Boston Globe?  Talk about PATHETIC!  What a rag!!
      Massachusetts State U and it looked to me to be nothing more
      than an AP news clip.  What a total rag.
77.319Another poor day of coverageKALI::MORGANThu Jan 06 1994 19:369
    I think it was an AP news clip!  That paper is beginning to really piss me
    off, but the other one is even worse.  Even the sports reports on all
    the stations refer to "the 3 New England teams in the top 20, BC,
    UCONN, and UMASS" like UMASS is of no interest.
    
    I think it's time to mail off a few letters to these imbaciles.  Anyone
    else care to join me?
    
    					Steve
77.320Globe sucksROCK::MURPHYNumber 20 and reboundingThu Jan 06 1994 19:3919
    I am getting ready to drop my subscription. After Madden's disgusting
    column about the 40 reasons FSU should be number one (that alone made
    me root for NU) and the column yesterday BC and ND, I am convinced the
    paper has nothing but junk for sportswriters - perhaps even including
    McDonough (I like Gammons, I guess).
    
    I'd even take Bernie Lincicome (Trib) - his existence is justified by a
    classic column he wrote prior to the AFC championship game vs. Cleveland that
    led Denver to the massacre vs. SF.
    
    "There is a doom over the city of Denver. And it is not the smog. Grown
    men can feel fear throughout their bones. People hide in their homes,
    afraid to walk the streets. Little Children tug at their mothers and
    cry - asking to be told that it cannot be true. But alas, their fears
    will not be assuaged - their is no stopping fate - the Broncos are going 
    to the Super Bowl again. Only one thing stands in their way - the 
    Cleveland Browns - just like the welcome mat in front of my door."
    
    Murph
77.321PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 06 1994 19:552
    I've seen plenty of stuff on the UMASS basketball team from the Boston
    TV stations.
77.322Boston just not basketball territoryAKOCOA::BREENThu Jan 06 1994 20:1815
    I think what UMass needs to do is schedule a game at the garden
    (Boston) to focus beantown attention on the program.  Btw there has
    been attempts to get Boston, its media and fans to pay attention to
    college basketball including garden doubleheaders featuring Umass and
    BC, not to speak of home and home games thruout the 60s between bc and
    umass but Boston and vicinity is just not non-Celtics basketball
    territory and never has been.
    
    But those letters will help a lot and the better UMass does in
    generating basketball excitement in greater boston the more it will
    help BC and other Boston programs.
    
    The biggest excitement this area ever had basketball-wise were the
    Michael Adams/BC wars with Georgetown and Cambridge's own Patrick Ewing
    at Boston Garden in the mid 80s.
77.323RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 07 1994 11:4513
    re: 77.322
    
    True 'nuf.  I saw Carolina play in the Boston Garden in the early 80's
    in a double header.  We pounded BU; can't remember who Boston College
    played.  
    
    Those were the days when Dean still smoked.  I remember after the game
    (we played first) he was sitting up in the stands and I caught him
    sneaking a butt.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
77.324Boston is a horrid college basketball town.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 07 1994 11:4813
77.325KALI::MORGANFri Jan 07 1994 12:017
    I saw BC play Georgetown play at the Garden during the Ewing era.  The
    place was packed and quite hostile toward Patrick.
    
    Mac, Boston television treats the Minutemen like an ugly sister.  No
    respect at all, especially for a top 10 team in their own backyard.
    
    					Steve
77.326GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Jan 07 1994 12:5327
         I have about written off Boston as a totally "pro sports focused"
    town, that will never be too excited about collegiate sports, other
    than BC.  I could understand the media's interest in the professional
    teams in 1986, when all four teams were of championship calibre, however
    given the mediocrity today of the Red Sox, Pat's, Celtics and Bruins,
    I can't see why the media always leads with stories on the pro's and the
    collegians are an afterthought.
    
         The exception to this is Boston College.  The Globe regularly
    devotes a couple of columns (if not more space) to their football and
    basketball teams, and Channel Five and Mike Lynch have to be in Chet
    Gladchuk's back pocket, given the time they set aside for the Eagles.  The
    other Boston teams, Harvard, Northeastern and BU, get little or no 
    mention.  I used to think that it was related to alumni power, however
    when you stop to think that UMASS has been graduating 3500 students
    a year since the mid'60's, 75% of whom live inside of Rt. 495, well,
    you would think the media would recognize the numbers and power of 
    that alumni base.
    
         I have written letters to the Globe, and I have called WCVB
    looking to chastize Mike Lynch, however I can't say that it has made
    a bit of difference.  But by all means, write your letters.  Then,
    maybe, when UMASS makes the Final Four next season, they will rate
    better than a wire service story in the Globe!
    
    Russ
                                                                        
77.327HokeyROCK::MURPHYNumber 20 and reboundingFri Jan 07 1994 13:0711
    One exception - I have never seen a paper devote so much (wasted) space
    to College Hockey. 
    
    I guess I may have to attend a game or two - when in Rome, as they
    say...
    
    Any opinions on prime games to see, and at whose home base (aside from,
    of course, the Beanpot). Looking for rowdy crowds with druken coeds.
    
    Murph
    
77.328GWEN::ASHEDetriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. ChampsFri Jan 07 1994 13:113
    Not sure about Hockey Least.  I know going to see RPI at Harvard's
    normally an exciting game with SRO.
    
77.329KALI::MORGANFri Jan 07 1994 14:035
    I used to go to the BC games when I was in high school during the early
    70s.  Our coach was an alumnus.  Obviously, this was way before Conte
    Forum, but the place was always packed.
    
    					Steve
77.330UMaine, school's fight song is a beerhall melodyCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 07 1994 14:2614
    Murph,
    Go see BU and BC play each other. Always a blood bath no matter the
    venue. Then you can hit all the college bars up and down Beacon and
    Comm Ave. Good mixture of BC/BU coeds.
    
    A_course if ya want real college hockey decadence, take a trip to
    Orono to see the BlackBears of UMaine. They got nuttin' better to
    do in that frozen tundra but drink, watch hockey, and you know
    the third thang.
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
77.331MSE1::FRANCUSNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Fri Jan 07 1994 14:328
    Beanpot tournament is very big in Boston.
    
    re: Mike Lynch. Channel 5 led off a sports broadcast earlier this week
    that UMass fans were complaining that no one paid any attention to the
    Minutemen and then led off the segment with UMass' win over ???
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.332MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jan 07 1994 14:3512
   How much coverage do UMass fans expect when the Pats were on 
  a five game winning streak, the Celtics are having major troubles
  and the Bruins are finally getting untracked? And last I checked, 
  Amherst was 70 or so miles from Boston. Up in these parts 70 miles 
  is a long ways. Because while UMass *is* the state university, the Globe
  isn't the state newspaper. It's the metropolitan Boston newspaper and
  for now BC is metropolitan Boston's college team - in all sports. UMass
  has a HUGE following in central/western Massachussetts. They will get
  a lot more recognition from the Boston media come tourney time but for 
  right now, I for one don't feel like they're getting slighted. This is 
  Massachusetts not Kentucky.
77.333PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 07 1994 14:438
77.334Spoken like a true ProSportsOriented Bostonian.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 07 1994 14:445
    Mr. Brydie couldn't have summed up any better why Boston is a *lousy*
    college hoops town.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.335MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jan 07 1994 14:493
 Chris, care to name a major US city with 4 pro sports teams that is also a
great college hoops town? 
77.336Dead on, Tommy... NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 07 1994 15:0213
                                           
    And who cares, in any case, as if not being a college hoops town is
    some great crime?  Has Boston had much reason to become one, over the
    long haul, based on the histories of BC/UMass/BU/Northeastern or 
    anyone else?  Providence certainly has had more college basketball 
    success, and therefore tradition.  The same applies for the oft-heard
    criticisms of Boston's provincial obsession with baseball, and its 
    disdain for watching out-of-town NFL and NBA games, etc., as if these 
    are bad things, that when not following the hometown boys people might
    actually be reading a book or something...
    
    glenn
    
77.337PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 07 1994 15:072
    Imagine that.  Boston is being slammed for having more things to do
    than being a community that revolves around one thing.
77.338Be proud Bostonians! Puff yer chests a little extra today!!!!!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 07 1994 15:105
    Never said it was a crime to be a lousy college hoops town.  Just
    stating it as fact, which it is.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.339Face it, college basketball interest just aint thereAKOCOA::BREENFri Jan 07 1994 15:1224
      <<< Note 77.330 by CTHQ::LEARY "Corporate Telecom Technology
    Solutions" >>>
                 -< UMaine, school's fight song is a beerhall melody >-
                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    But then again, so is "The Star Spangled Banner"
    
    Back to Boston and College Basketball...
    
    Tommy is right on this one; in the Northeast Providence and Mid-Conn.
    are avid college basketball areas but Boston and I contend NY are not.
    The NIT had to abandon the round of 16/8 and go to semis only and
    anyone can get a seat to NY NIT on game day.  And same goes for
    Chicago, Detroit...  LA still seems hot for Bruins though.
    
    And Roberts center in the 70s with its 4000 seat capacity only rarely
    sold out in 70s but 2800 would fill the side rafters and speckle the
    bleachers.  Georgetown would sell out, perhaps St. Johns or Conn/Prov
    but for the latter half the crowd was visitor rooters.
    
    But if Calipari does continue his success the Globe will finally come
    around, and it's support of BC is mainly football with BC basketball -
    I doubt for example that coverage compares with coverage in Atlanta of
    Georgia Tech basketball.
77.340But do the Crimson really care how the boys are doing?ROCK::MURPHYNumber 20 and reboundingFri Jan 07 1994 16:0336
    I will say that DePaul is on WGN and UofI is only on some smaller 
    independent channel. But the fact remains that all UI games are 
    televised in Chicago, and they get a lot of press. In fact,
    Northeastern Ill gets more space in the Trib than UMASS does
    in the globe it seems. Pre-game box for all games, small story for all
    games, and a spot in a 2-3 times weekly hoops roundup section. Most
    Illini games (all B10 games) warrant front page space and quite a 
    few columns unless
    1) Bears just played
    2) BOTH Bulls and Hawks played
    3) A major story (Super Bowl, NY Day Bowls, Jordan retires, Hawks make
    cup, etc...)
    Same goes for DePaul. Attention, of course, is drawn mostly to the
    program making the most noise. The college basketball page(s) will 
    have a separate section with capsules of all the B10 games.
    
    Now - why is this. Part of the reason Boston is not a big time college
    sports town is that most of its residents did not go to big time
    colleges 8-) Er, well, colleges with big time programs. They went to 
    the Ivies, Bentleys, Northeasterns, and Babsons of the world. If I
    asked any of the NE alums here how the hoops team was doing they
    couldn't tell me. I can tell you the whole Illini schedule by now.
    And I know who plays who this weekend in the B10. Chicago is full of
    Big 10 alums. I know of 4 bars in Lincoln Park alone that have rooms
    reserved for UM alums on Football Days. So coverage of B10, primarily
    Illinois, will sell papers. 
    
    The Globe is a business and is run as such. If hundreds of UMASS fans
    called and wrote threatening to cancel their subscriptions is UMASS
    didn't get more coverage, it would increase it's coverage. But more
    people here grew up on the Celts, so they get the space.
    
    IMHO.
    
    Murph
    
77.341If they give it a try they might be surprisedKALI::MORGANFri Jan 07 1994 16:1614
    With the state of the professional teams at this time in Boston, what
    better time than now to trumpet the state university?  It may even
    install a little pride in a few people.  People don't care about
    college basketball because it gets no press!  
    
    The Celtics are mediocre at best, the Bruins are a half dozen guys, 
    plus a goalie, away from competing, the Pats are done (maybe gone) 
    and Lou Gorman's in hibernation.  Now is the time to devote space to 
    a young, talented and well coached UMass team.
    
    As I said before, I'm surprised that even ch. 27 out of Worcester
    doesn't offer up more games.
    
    					Steve
77.342PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 07 1994 17:059
77.343CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 07 1994 17:198
Yea, Holy Cross and WPI - now there are two athletic powers.  No wonder teams 
Western Mass, like UMass can't compete.

That bastion of sports knowledge, the Worcester T&G must devote most of their 
space ot HC tennis and WPI lacrosse, when they aren't making those rock-solid 
NBA picks.

=Bob=
77.344MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jan 07 1994 17:3527
 >> Yea, Holy Cross and WPI - now there are two athletic powers.  No 
 >> wonder teams Western Mass, like UMass can't compete.

    Holy Cross has a much richer athletic tradition than UMass does and
    it's right in the city of Worcester. A lot of old timers remember when
    the Cross was a national power and it still holds a place dear in their
    hearts. Bob Cousyplayed of rthe Cross and still lives in the city. Tom
    Heisohn, Togo Palazzi and Bob Perry all played for the Cross. Still, UMass
    could unseat Holy Cross and build a fan base amongst younger folks which
    may be why they've taken to playing a game a year in the Centrum.
    

 >> That bastion of sports knowledge, the Worcester T&G must devote most of 
 >> their space ot HC tennis and WPI lacrosse, when they aren't making those 
 >> rock-solid NBA picks.

    What's this beef you have with the T&G, Bobcat? Its sports page may not be
    as good as the Globe's but, personally, I think it's as good or better than
    the Herald's. And even if it isn't, it's more than adequate for a city the
    size of Worcester.


    BTW - speaking of sportspages, does anyone else think that the Globe's
          Dan Shaugnessy got slam dunked by St. Louis' Phil Dine, in this
          morning's Globe, for that idiotic article where Shaugnessy ragged
          all over the city of St. Louis.
77.345PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 07 1994 17:499
77.346CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 07 1994 18:1121
Having lived throug some of the later "glory days" of Holy Cross sports, (Ron
Perry Jr., and some great football teams which featured guys I played with in 
HS), I know that they have a great sports tradition, and that they dominate the
sports scene in Worcester.  My point is that right now they are not making the 
effort in sports that UMass is, and I would think that Worcester would be close
enough to UMass to develop a following.  I guess the problem is that they 
(UMass) are new to the scene, and aside from alums, have to build a following 
from scratch, without the tradition (unless folks consider the Jack Lehman 
teams a legacy).

While I don't follow them with a passion, I think it's great to have a real 
college hoops team in the area.

re: the T&G

This goes back to the revelation by a certain Worcester resident we all know, 
who came out with "The T&G is picking the Suns".  Yea, they are a good local 
sports section (certainly better than, say the Lowell Sun), but lets recognize
them for what they are - a second string paper from a second string city.

=Bob=
77.347Shaugnessy suxROCK::MURPHYNumber 20 and reboundingFri Jan 07 1994 18:327
    Re: Shaugnessy - ah yes, I remember this column too. I read it and
    could not figure out how anything in the column had anything to do with
    Journalism. I stated somewhere else that I felt the same about a recent
    Madden column. I really think their writers stink.
    
    Murph
    
77.348FRETZ::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyFri Jan 07 1994 18:493
    When I was growing up in the '70s, I pretty much ignored UMASS and
    followed Da Cross on TV and went to quite a few games.  They had some
    decent teams in the late '80s.
77.349CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 07 1994 22:3111
    Murph,
    You've obviously spent more time in Chitown than moi (my 2nd favorite
    city), but tell me, do the Trib ansd Sun Times still devote mucho
    space and time to ND football? Seemed to me that ND football always
    grabbed more space than both UofI and NU, but I could be wrong.
    Ferget ND BBall. And hail, you could fill the Sears Tower with
    Chicago area alums for ND football games.
    
    IMO,
    MikeL
    
77.350PapersESKIMO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Jan 10 1994 16:0810
      Actually, I think the Worcester Telagram already covers
      UMass reasonably well.
    
      The one Globe sportswriter I really like is Bob Ryan.  I
      know he seems a bit pompous, but man does he write excellent
      basketball columns imho.  I also like his other columns.
    
      I don't care for Shaughnessy either though.
    
                                               Tony
77.351West Virginia next upGIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Jan 11 1994 12:209
         The UM'ies are now ranked 7th in the AP Men's Basketball Poll
    and even drew one(1) first place vote!  Things could change by the next
    poll, as UMASS travels to Morgantown to play 9 and 1, West Virginia,
    on Thursday Night.  This same WVU club defeated UMASS by 25 last year,
    after UMASS took a one point lead into half time!  West Virginia starts
    five seniors who have been somewhat the underachievers during their
    careers, and now have something to prove.
    
    Russ
77.352PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 12:353
    UMASS basketball finally makes it to the NCAA tournament after years of
    mediocrity and folks all of a sudden want every newspaper and TV
    station in the land devote headline stories to them.
77.353KALI::MORGANTue Jan 11 1994 13:0616
    That's not the point Mac.  The point is that the professional winter 
    sports teams in Boston now suck.  There is a window here for the media 
    to put the spotlight elsewhere, that being Amherst.  Make people feel
    good.  Do a couple of stories on a top ten team.  I can't remember the 
    last time a team from Massachusetts has been in the top 10 in basketball.
    
    I do know this.  Last night the sports report on Ch. 5 in Boston
    (biggest 6:00 news program), consisted of 3.5 minutes of nonsense about
    Nancy Kerrigan, and 1 minute for the rest of the sports world.  30 seconds 
    of that one minute showed a fight that took place at a press conference, 
    for an upcoming boxing match in England.  Don't you think they could
    spend some of that 3.5 minutes on something a bit more substantial?  I
    don't want to sound too uncaring, but I've had about enough news about
    Nancy Kerrigan's knee!  And I have a feeling the worst is yet to come.
    
    					Steve
77.354Is the UMass - W Va game on TV Thursday?TNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthTue Jan 11 1994 14:0612
    Re. a city that's a good college sports town with four major pro
    teams:  Philadelphia obviously is one (about the same size as Boston).
    I would add New York to that mix, and what about Dallas?  College
    sports are HUGE in Texas.
    
    As for UMass, I guess I would like more coverage in the local rags on
    college sports in general, and their response always is there is not
    enough interest in college sports to warrant coverage.  But of course
    if you don't cover it, there won't be any interest generated.  It's a
    classic Catch 22 situation.
    
    NAZZ
77.355MinuteMain hoops will hit the dust bin once Calipari goes ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Jan 11 1994 14:227
    The issue about UMass getting sufficient publicity becomes VERY
    relevant when you consider Calipari's future.  Will he stay at a
    program that he basically built from scratch knowing that New England
    isn't developing into a college hoops haven?  [no]
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.356MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 11 1994 14:3523
  >> Re. a city that's a good college sports town with four major pro
  >> teams:  Philadelphia obviously is one (about the same size as Boston).
    
     I don't know how big college basketball is in Philly but the city is
     *considerably* larger than Boston and has a tradition of great college
      ball what with Temple, Seton Hall, Villanova, etc. Boston doesn't have
      anything close to that.
 
  >> I would add New York to that mix, and what about Dallas?  College
  >> sports are HUGE in Texas.
    
     The Knicks didn't sell out all of their games last year in the biggest 
     city in the country. One could reasonably argue that New York isn't a
     very good pro sports town much less college sports town. As for Dallas, 
     what's the big college basketball team in Dallas? SMU? Are they really 
     that big down there? I don't think so.
     
      I just think it's a little early in both the season and in UMass' rise
     as a national power to be expecting large statewide fan support and press
     coverage, especially with the pro sports teams as entrenched as they are in
     the hearts of the populous. Hardcore sports fans like the folks in here
     appreciate the team and crave more coverage but casual fans will take longer
     to win over. Patience, dude.   
77.357Not Expecting Front Page NewsSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Jan 11 1994 14:4325
    re: .352
    
      I don't know where you're coming from.  I complained that after
      a game, UMass got an AP news clip.  To conclude that my expectation
      is that they make front page headline news is to read into my
      reply what simply wasn't there.  I just expect some coverage, that's
      all.
    
      Being from Milwaukee which is sort of a three sport city (Green Bay
      plays three games in Milwaukee and while definitely belonging in
      Green Bay, gets substantial coverage), they cover the Wisconsin
      Badgers A LOT.  But, to be fair, there are not a whole lof of other
      colleges to cover.  I guess their coverage of the Wisconsin football
      team was bigger news than even the Packers if you can believe it.
    
      My feeling is that the University of Massachusetts is the main state
      university and the Globe is the main state newspaper.  It is utterly
      bizarre for the newspaper to sometimes relegate AP wires to its
      coverage of the team especially when they are top 10.
    
      I'll bet if any other state in the country had a top ten state 
      university basketball team, that state's major newspaper would cover
      that team much much more than the Globe covers UMass.
    
                                                      Tony
77.358PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 14:523
    Well, Steve, Nancy Kerrigan is a local.  Isn't that what you want --
    more stuff about locals so you don't have to dwell on the poor
    performances of the pros?
77.359PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 15:006
77.360MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 11 1994 15:0013
   >> The issue about UMass getting sufficient publicity becomes VERY
   >> relevant when you consider Calipari's future.  Will he stay at a
   >> program that he basically built from scratch knowing that New England
   >> isn't developing into a college hoops haven?  [no]
    
      Calipari isn't stupid enough to expect New England to "develop into
      a hoops haven" simply because of the success of his program. He may
      be able to generate enough in-state support to land himself a nice
      fat deal but nobody with a modicum of common sense envisions this 
      entire state going ga-ga over the state university's b-ball team the 
      way they do in Kentucky, North Carolina, Indiana or one of them other 
      states where hog callin' is considered a cultural event.
77.361PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 15:0722
77.362KALI::MORGANTue Jan 11 1994 16:4612
    Come on Mac, you're a pretty sharp guy - but you're acting dead from
    the ass up on this one.
    
    It seems pretty warped to me that Mike Lynch can devote 70% of his sports
    report to tell us that Nancy Kerrigan may be skating in the next week
    to 10 days!  I don't even think the majority of the time spent on this 
    story be clogging up the sports report.
    
    It only makes sense to me that they explore other avenues when looking
    to fill sports reporting time during lulls in sports activities. 
    
    					Steve
77.363CSC32::M_MACGREGORTue Jan 11 1994 18:5718
    
    Tony,
    
    >My feeling is that the University of Massachusetts is the main state
    >university and the Globe is the main state newspaper.
    
    You may want to define these.  I *think* UMASS is the THIRD largest
    university in Massachusetts behind Northeastern University (the world's
    largest private school) and Boston University.  Now if by state
    univeristy you mean state subsidized, then you may be correct.
    
    While the Globe easily has the largest subscription in the state, I'd
    bet that in the western parts it does not compete with the Springfield
    and Worchester papers.  The Globe is written for people who live in and
    near Boston.
    
    Marc
    
77.364PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 11 1994 19:207
77.365MKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursTue Jan 11 1994 19:266
>> There is no H in Worcester!!!!!

	Yeah, save it for Pittsburg(h)!


	billl
77.366Now if Marcus Camby goes out and bites a dog...AKOCOA::BREENWed Jan 12 1994 14:2017
    Again, I would like an objective look at college basketball (current)
    interest in former hotbeds NY and Philly.  I have my doubts.  And what
    are the four cities with hockey,fb,baseball,baskets?  
    boston,
    ny
    philly
    dallas
    la
    detroit
    chicago
    
    Miami is now on that list I guess or am I wrong ?
    
    And the Kerrigan story is what sells papers and builds tv ratings and
    exactly illustrates the umass-bglobe issue...
    
    
77.367Some recruiting questionsTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthWed Jan 12 1994 14:3315
    I have a UMass question (sorry to get back on the topic!).  Is Tyrone
    Weeks on scholarship while sitting out as a prop 48 student?  How does
    that rule work?  Are you allowed to keep your scholarship even if you
    aren't playing basketball, as long as you're enrolled in school?
    
    If he is not on scholarship, do they have two scholarships available
    for nexted season?  I think they have 10 guys on scholarship on the
    team now, and I would think Rigo Nunez would earn one for the way he
    has played this season.  That would mean they could only give out one
    scholarship for nexted season, which may explain why they went so hard
    after the 6-8 kid from Pittsburg, Danny Fortson.  Are they looking at
    any other seniors, or are they concentrating on juniors who will have
    to replace Roe, Williams, Kellogg, and Meyer?
    
    NAZZ
77.368Yeah, I'd Lose That BetSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Jan 12 1994 14:4616
      re: .361
    
        I thought about it some more and I think I'd lose that
        bet too!  I guess Massachusetts ranks up there with
        a few other states that have a lot of things going on.
    
        There just isn't nearly as much activity in say Wisconsin
        and this probably biased my thoughts.
    
        You're right though...I can't see California or New York
        or perhaps Florida giving a lot of coverage to all their
        state schools or whatever.
    
        I still wouldn't mind seeing a little more coverage though!
    
                                                  Tony
77.369METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 12 1994 14:525
Only college team in NYC that gets coverage is St. Johns basketball. Even
that often depends not only on how well they are doing but also what
the Knicks and Rangers (sometimes Islanders/Devils/Nets) are doing.

The Crazy Met
77.370GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Jan 14 1994 11:2926
         UMASS came away with perhaps their second most impressive
    victory of the season last night, as they thoroughly dismantled
    one of the better teams in the east, West Virginia, with a 70-56
    win in Morgantown.  By all accounts the game was not as close as the
    final score indicates.  West Virginia, ranked 23rd in the Nation,
    had brought a 15 game home winning streak into the game, and hadn't
    lost this season since their first game in late November.  In the
    meantime they had registered victories over Ohio State, Pittsburg and
    Temple.
    
         For UMASS, Dana Dingle, Derek Kellogg and Mike Williams played
    solid games.  According to John Calipari, team defense and rebounding
    were keys to the victory.
    
         Two things are becoming absolutely scarey about this team.  First,
    there are no seniors on the roster, so this current group will have 
    approximately 45 to 50 more games together.  Secondly, UMASS has really
    not developed a cohesive offense yet.  Calipari and his assistants in
    their post game comments always complain about the lack of "crispness"
    on the offensive end.  Even so, they haven't been in a close game since
    the NIT in November.  They will need better offensive output in coming
    weeks, as over a two week span at the end of the month, they play
    Cinncinnati, Florida State, Temple, Kentucky, and URI (twice).
    
    Russ
                                                                 
77.371KALI::MORGANFri Jan 14 1994 11:3613
    And the Globe had a staff reporter cover the game.  He was either there
    in person, or watching on a dish.  Somewhat encouraging.  
    
    WBZ radio still found it necessary to give the scores of Northeastern
    vs. Vermont and Hartford vs. ?, before giving the score of the 7th
    ranked Minutemen.
    
    BTW, Dana Dingle had 17 and Mike Williams, 16 points.  Lou Roe had only
    9.  Don't have any rebound or shots blocked stats.
    
    					Steve
    
    					Steve
77.372PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 14 1994 12:193
    The second story on Mike Lynch's Channel 5 sports report this morning
    was the Minutemen complete with highlights.  The first story was the
    Bruins getting embarrassed in Philly.
77.373btw - Any comments on mr. J.Kidd?AKOCOA::BREENFri Jan 14 1994 12:2214
    ESPN announcer/color - don't pay attention enough to know who's
    commenting - mentioned "why not umass for #1?"
    
    Sounds good to me.
    
    Duke had good chances in the last 10 secs; Hill missed a jumper and
    someone simply dropped the putback.
    
    It seemed obvious live that it was a 3 but refs,scorers all took choke
    except opposite ref(on replay) signaled a 3.
    
    plenty of upsets / comebacks.  I slept thru cal-Ariz.  
    
    Billb
77.374MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jan 14 1994 12:3011
    
    
      You may be thinking of Digger Phelps, Bill. I know he said last night
     before the Cal-Arizona game that they were legit Top 4. WVU's coach
     predicted that the Minutemen would make the Final 4. I have to admit
     to being a little surprised at how incredibly successful UMass is. 
     After losing Harper Williams to graduation and another player to disc-
     iplinary problems, I figured on another tourney appearance but not
     much more, especially being as young as they are. I was really looking
     forward to next year as far as national title hopes go. Now, they have 
     a real shot at being ranked number one and who knows from there.
77.375CNTROL::CHILDSPhil Simms the real NFL MVP!Fri Jan 14 1994 12:3117
>    ESPN announcer/color - don't pay attention enough to know who's
>    commenting - mentioned "why not umass for #1?"
    
   they'll get more consideration but I figure it'll be Kansas...
    
    
>    It seemed obvious live that it was a 3 but refs,scorers all took choke
>    except opposite ref(on replay) signaled a 3.
    
 
   homecourt advantage?????

 Kidd is the real deal. I've seen him 3 times and he always impresses me..
 As smart as they come....

 mike
77.376gonna fleece I.M.J. on that day...CNTROL::CHILDSPhil Simms the real NFL MVP!Fri Jan 14 1994 12:398
 They proved they were legit final 4 when they beat UNC, despite Phelps'
 cheapshot....

 I hope they get a chance to trash UConn someplace down the road....

 mike

77.377A great win for UMassTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Jan 14 1994 13:4414
    I got to see the first half of the game at Jade East in Tewksbury on a 
    satellite dish.  There are a bunch of guys there who have recently
    been converted to UMass fans!
    
    The most amazing thing about the first half was how completely UMass
    dominated W Va defensively.  There was not a shot that wasn't
    contested, and UMass simply outquicked them on the boards.  For a team
    that starts 6-6 6-6 and 6-7 up front, UMass rebounds exceptionally
    well.  Derek Kellogg was outstanding at the point, contolling the tempo
    on offense and playing great defense.  He is one of the most improved
    point guards in the country, and combined with Mike Williams makes up
    perhaps the best backcourt combination in the country.
    
    NAZZ
77.378MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Jan 14 1994 13:5410

    The biggest problem with Kellogg last year was that he was afraid
   to hoist it up. He passed up so many open shots that teams started 
   laying off of him. I think it was just nerves because he definitely 
   has the range and touch. I can see Padilla taking Kellogg's spot next
   year, though. Padilla's quicker, a better scorer and plays really heads
   up, poised ball for a true freshmen. Mike Williams is my favorite UMass
   player. The kid is going to light it up for 40+ one of these nights and
   he's always around the loose ball. A bit streaky but a true scorer.
77.379GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Jan 14 1994 14:318
         The "wasteland" of high school basketball, the Commonwealth
    of Massachusetts, turned out a pretty good graduating class of point
    guards in June of 1991.  Travis Best is the main man on a pretty good
    Ga. Tech team, Rick Brunson is playing the point for Top 10 Temple,
    and the biggest surprise, Derek Kellogg is playing very respectable
    ball for Top 10 UMASS.
    
    Russ
77.380SKEWED::MCKAYFri Jan 14 1994 14:545
    It will never happen Mikey!
    
    final four team?  Please....They'll be lucky to make the 16 round.
    
    Jimbo
77.381I'm hope to see them live in Charlotte...CNTROL::CHILDSPhil Simms the real NFL MVP!Fri Jan 14 1994 16:186
 side bet: who goes farther.....

 mikey    
   

77.382UMass StuffSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Jan 14 1994 16:4214
      I caught the ESPN comment as well...about UMass deserving 
      consideration for #1.  I can't see Kansas not being rated 
      higher than UMass especially when they beat UMass already.
      Also, how does UMass climb higher than UCLA or perhaps
      Kentucky?
    
      What's this about UMass starting 6'6, 6'6, and 6'7???  How
      tall is Camby anyway??  He's gotta be starting, right??
    
      Its something UMass is playing as well as they are what with
      their youth.  Camby is such a presence.  Man, to have Camby and
      Roe for the inside game...wow!
    
      But, next year ought to be really something.
77.383That's where the 6-7, 6-6, 6-6 comes fromTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Jan 14 1994 17:495
    Camby has not started (except perhaps once) since returning from his
    knee injury.  Calipari starts Roe at center with Dingle and Bright at
    the forwards.
    
    NAZZ
77.384Will Roe be around next year - I mean declareAKOCOA::BREENFri Jan 14 1994 18:491
    
77.385UMass rolls, now 13-1TNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Jan 17 1994 13:3019
    IMO, Roe would be no better than a late first round pick if he comes
    out this year, but he would have a chance to be a lottery pick if he
    plays his senior season and continues to improve.
    
    Saw the Minutemen crush the Bonnies Saturday night.  Game started out
    slowly, and Coach Cal, deathly afraid of a letdown after the big win
    at Morgantown, yanked the entire starting five after only two minutes
    of play.  Camby, Meyer, Padilla, Travieso, and Nunez didn't play much
     better, but the move certainly woke up the starters, who exploded for
    a 22-6 run midway through the first half to turn the game into a
    laugher.  
    
    Roe tallied his 1000th career poipnt, the 23rd UMass player to reach
    that plateau.  BUt the real star of the night was Camby.  This kid is
    special - he runs the break, passes the ball, has some great offensive
    moves, and of course is incredibly quick on defense.  If anyone is
    gonna cut their college career short to enter the pros, it'll be Camby.
    
    NAZZ
77.386MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 18 1994 15:373

   UMass vs. DePaul will be on WGN tonight at 8:00 PM.
77.387That figures, we don't get WGNKALI::MORGANTue Jan 18 1994 16:111
    
77.388UMass Above Kansas?LUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Jan 18 1994 16:214
      Not that it really matters, but I wonder if UMass jumps ahead 
      of Kansas following their loss against Kansas State.
    
                                                   Tony
77.389U-Mass lostSALEM::STIGWed Jan 19 1994 09:443
    nope...they lost last night....
    
                   stig
77.390GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Jan 19 1994 12:0029
         Yup, UMASS ran into a white-hot Tom Kleinschmidt last night 
    and suffered a 78-76 loss to unranked Depaul.  The game was a seesaw
    affair throughout, as Depaul had as large as a 6 point lead at one
    point in the first half, and UMASS went up by as many as 7 points in
    the second half.  Down the stretch however, Kleinschmidt went
    unconscious, despite whomever Calipari assigned defensive
    responsibilities to (Dingle, Williams, Roe, doubleteams).  UMASS did
    have the last chance to pull out a win with two seconds left, and
    actually did run a well conceived play, but Lou Roe clanged a three
    point attempt from the left side, and it was lights out.
    
         For UMASS, it was a bit of an inconsistent effort all the way 
    around.  They were badly outrebounded by Depaul in the first half, 
    perhaps the first time all year that they were trashed on the boards.
    Roe and Williams were no shows in the first half, and Kellogg didn't
    do much throughout.  Camby was the story in the first half, scoring
    11 points.  In the second half Mike Williams attempted to take over,
    and he did score well inside, but continued to shoot poorly from long
    range.  Despite their shooting problems from outside, strangely, they
    had a clutch performance from the charity stripe, hitting something
    like 16 out of 19 attempts.
    
         With other losses within the Top 10 this week, I expect UMASS to
    fall back a bit, but to remain in the Top 10, perhaps at number 9 or
    10.  Next up, Rutgers on Thursday, and GWU on Saturday, both at
    Mullins.
    
    Russ
        
77.391Not much interest, course Joey Meyer is a geek :*)ANGLIN::WIERSBECKChildsIsWrong-ReevesIsGOD!Wed Jan 19 1994 13:206
    Did you notice there were maybe only about 1000 people there?  Depaul
    has a pretty good team, but NW and Illinois easily outdraw them on a
    consistant basis.  Depaul plays a pretty good schedule too.
    
    
    Spud
77.392on TVHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropWed Jan 19 1994 13:255
DePaul is on WGN a lot so I've seen 'em play a couple of times this year.
They look to be developing a pretty solid team. The win over UMass wasn't
a big surprise.

TTom
77.393MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jan 19 1994 13:2926
    The good new is that UMass is on the front page of today's
   Boston Globe sports section. The bad news is that they lost
   to DePaul last night. UMass looked really flat last night.
   They didn't have the usual defensive intensity. They didn't
   really press until late in the second half. They didn't
   crash the boards like they usually do. DePaul, on the other
   hand, came ready to play. They were as pumped as though they
   playing North Carolina or Indiana or one of the other more
   traditional powers. In the closing seconds of the game, the 
   DePaul fans and players were celebrating just as UMass did 
   when they knocked of #1 earlier this season. They were brought
   back to earth, however, when UMass almost erased a five point
   deficit in the final 15 or so seconds. Some good did come
   of this game. UMass learned that they have to come to play
   every night. They learned that other teams will be getting up
   for them, that's part of the price of being a top ten program.
   UMass is a little road weary but with their record, a loss 
   at this point in the season doesn't mean all that much.


    BTW- there were *only* 1,000 or so people there becuase it was -25 
         outside. -60 with the wind chill. They were expecting a sellout
         but with the game being televised it really was wise to stay
         home and watch instead of venturing out in that kind of weather.
    
77.394KALI::MORGANWed Jan 19 1994 13:436
    I've noticed UMASS's strength since Calipari took over has been their
    intensity on the boards.  I've never followed a college team that has
    been so relentless on the glass.  Sounds like they may have coasted
    last night in that area, but that's to be expected every so often.
    
    					Steve
77.395This will ultimately help DePaul's NCAA Tourney hopes ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Jan 19 1994 14:2222
    Me and Dean are of the opinion that you should never learn more from 
    a loss than a win.  It all depends on proper evaluation of game execution, 
    and being honest with your assessments regardless of whether you won or 
    lost.  Simply put, it's possible to play extremely well and lose, and 
    vice versa.
    
    No, the real story for UMass getting beat is the simple reaction of the
    DePaul players and fans after the game.  They went crazy, cause they'd
    knocked off a Top5/Top10 team.  Schools like North Carolina face this
    kindof struggle constantly.  Everybody's geared for ya.  You cannot
    have an off-night and win.  You'd better come to play each and every
    night, otherwise you're gonna be in the headlines the next day.  (If'n
    ya win though, it'll be a small ho-hum footnote.)
    
    Toward this end I always remember Red Auerbach's arrogance that
    naturally rubbed off on his players and helped build the Celtic legacy. 
    He'd tell his players that, if they won, to act as if you *expected* to
    win.  Hence the C's would walk calmly off the court after a 'W'.  Just
    another day at the office.  I always thought that was cool.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.396Well...ROCK::MURPHYIllini = overratedWed Jan 19 1994 14:2517
    Re: DePaul not selling out...
    
    If I were a DePaul student, I'd probably go to the games, except
    the Rosemont isn't even near campus - it would be kind of like BC 
    playing at the Centrum. Not as many miles away as Worcester, but it
    requires travel on the Kennedy at rush hour, so the time and trouble is
    about the same. 
    
    If I were a Chicago resident... I might have Bulls/Hawks/Theatre
    tickets, or want to go downtown. If I were a Decatur or Danville
    resident, I would go to the Illinois basketball game.
    
    DePaul easily gets more space in the Trib than UI or NW. And they sell
    more tix than you saw last night.
    
    Murph
    
77.397VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady,Steady,Go!Wed Jan 19 1994 15:025
    	So ACC, what are you saying?  That if North Carolina loses to an
    inferior opponent in the NCAA's they should walk off the court like
    they expect it?
    
    				/Don
77.398Not minding the "warm" winter here at allANGLIN::WIERSBECKChildsIsWrong-ReevesIsGOD!Wed Jan 19 1994 15:428
    Acutally I don't think it reached -20 here last night.  At any rate
    that is cold, but up in MN that didn't stop Gopher fans from attending.
    This city practically shut down and there wasn't even any snow
    involved.  I'd hate to see these people have to deal with this on a
    regular basis.  They couldn't handle it.
    
    
    Spud
77.399METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 15:495
-21 in Chicago lasted night.

HtH

The Crazy Met
77.400Could it be Joey Meyer?ANGLIN::WIERSBECKChildsIsWrong-ReevesIsGOD!Wed Jan 19 1994 16:0112
    -19 in my area, but what's the difference at this point?  I guess if we
    look at the Purdue game - being on ESPN and all, they seemed to have a
    sellout and they're right down the road.  My question being, do you
    really think there were 15,000 no shows at the Horizon last night due
    to the weather?  DePaul may have drawn in the past, but I don't think 
    they're doing as well this year anyway.
    
    Take a look at the MN crowd on Thursday night against Michigan.  It's
    on ESPN and I doubt it'll be any warmer than -10 at gametime.
    
    
    Spud
77.401MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jan 19 1994 16:088
    
      The announcers last night said that a sell-out was expected but
     that the attendance was severely impacted by the weather. And as 
     Murph said, the Rosemont Horizon isn't on or even all that close 
     to the DePaul campus. I've seen DePaul play against unranked teams
     on WGN and the attendance is quite good; it should have been better 
     last night and the only plausible explanation, as to why it wasn't
     better, is the weather.
77.402commute's been a breeze the last couple daysANGLIN::WIERSBECKChildsIsWrong-ReevesIsGOD!Wed Jan 19 1994 18:1512
    I was told at lunch that most the fans that attend the Depaul games
    live out this way anyway and aren't students.  In other words, probably
    a lot of yuppie crowd.  
    
    ...and we know what that means.  :*)
    
    Still, that horrendous turnout last night is really a surprise to me.
    I don't see other schools (especially in the Big10) suffering from this
    problem with cold temps.  
    
    
    Spud
77.403METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 18:193
Spud, that p_name looks a bit hokey after last Saturday's game.

The Crazy Met
77.404Time for a cool changeANGLIN::WIERSBECKChildsIsWrong-ReevesIsGOD!Wed Jan 19 1994 19:0711
    Maybe it's my sick way of getting back at the Giants.  (Not really)
    I'll change it now.
    
    One last thing on this attendance deal.  I shoulda done this in the
    first place... those announcers who said it was a sellout - or near
    sellout must've been given real bad information.  Paid attendance was
    7,199.  Now that makes sense and is more in line to what Depaul has
    been drawing this year.
    
    
    Spud
77.405MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jan 19 1994 19:364
    
     If you've ever wondered what Mike Heiser looks like (goodness knows
    why) and you watched the DePaul-UMass game last night. Mike Heiser
    could be Tom Kleinschmidt's older, can't-play-basketball brother. 
77.406don't talk trash when you're not informedFRETZ::HEISERMatthew 5:18Wed Jan 19 1994 19:593
    Tommy, I'm real honored that I'm on your mind enough to keep posting
    these notes about me, but you better be careful before I downright
    embarass you on the hardwood.
77.407oooh...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedThu Jan 20 1994 12:083
    yeah...talk on the court...
    
               stig
77.408Looked much better in the 2nd halfKALI::MORGANFri Jan 21 1994 11:3111
    UMASS won by about 20 or so last night.  They were down by three at the
    half after two 3 pointers in the last minute by Rutgers (the 2nd a 35
    footer!).
    
    Camby banged up his knee again.  I didn't see much of the 2nd half so I
    don't know how much he played.  Calipari must have given them hell at
    halftime, cause they came out and put the screws to Rutgers on defense.
    
    Roe was high scorer with 17.
    
    					Steve
77.409USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jan 25 1994 12:091
When are the UMass-Temple games ?
77.410ask and you got it, Skippy!CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Jan 25 1994 12:2411
    
    
    Yabbut they play each other on  Feb 13 (home game for UMass) and Feb 24
    in Philly.
    
    snort
    
    I remain,
    letting ya know that Temple plays Duke 2/27
    Kev
    
77.411CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Jan 25 1994 12:306
>When are the UMass-Temple games ?

On the Sabbath?

8^)

77.412GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Jan 27 1994 12:428
         Important game for UMASS tonight, as they take on No. 20
    Cincinnati, on the road.  The UM'ies have played three very ordinary
    games in a row, and will have to snap out of their slump tonite
    if they want to remain a Top 10 Team.  Game time is 7:30 p.m. on ESPN.
    
    Russ
    
    
77.413A walk-on makes goodTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthThu Jan 27 1994 12:4914
    There was a very nice article in the Northwest Weekly section of the
    Sunday Globe on Rigoberto Nunez.  He is the walk-on from Lawrence who
    is currently seeing some decent minutes for the Minutemen.  Coach Cal
    is rewarding his play by placing him on scholarship for nexted season.
    Since he's only a sophomore, he'll get two years with a free ride.
    My 12 year old read the article and was impressed by how hard Rigo
    worked to get better.  He was 6-7, 168 lbs when he walked on lasted
    season.  Calipari told him he needed to get stronger to earn some PT,
    so he worked out religiously over the summer and changing his body
    type from anorexic to wiry, and reported in this year at 195.
    
    Rigo now is a regular member of Coach Cal's 10 man rotation.
    
    NAZZ
77.414Gotta get the fire back...KALI::MORGANThu Jan 27 1994 14:139
    You gotta like Nunez.  The kid is pumped from the minute he takes the
    court and goes after it.  I cringed a bit last week though when he sent
    Camby sprawling after putting in a 2nd chance hoop!
    
    Russ is right on in saying tonight's a biggie.  They can't expect to
    play like they did last week and come away with a win on the road
    against Cincy.
    
    					Steve
77.415MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Jan 27 1994 14:5615
 >> There was a very nice article in the Northwest Weekly section of the
 >> Sunday Globe on Rigoberto Nunez.  

    The UMass-GWU game was also covered on Page 1 of the Sunday Sports 
    section. The closer we get to March ,I imagine, the more coverage 
    that we'll see of UMass in the Boston papers.

    I don't remeber Nunez that well but if I had my druthers, Padilla
    would be starting ahead of Kellogg. Kellogg just doesn't strike me 
    as a big time PG. He doesn't create well at all - not his own shot 
    and not shots for others. He's a fair but unexceptional ballhandler 
    and defender. His saving grace is his hustle and heads up play which 
    are two admirable qualities in a backup player. Padilla is rough around
    the edges but he's quicker, a better ballhandler and can create better
    than Kellogg.
77.416AKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billThu Jan 27 1994 15:066
    Any chance of umass being on local tv prior to ncaas?
    
    I think this more than any boston globe added coverage would get
    attention directed at that program.
    
    Also, I didn't quite recall who knocked off UConn?
77.417just a nit - game on ESPN starts at 7:00CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Jan 27 1994 15:352
    
    
77.418most people in here have met me anywayFRETZ::HEISERshadowlandsThu Jan 27 1994 16:056
>     If you've ever wondered what Mike Heiser looks like (goodness knows
>    why) and you watched the DePaul-UMass game last night. Mike Heiser
>    could be Tom Kleinschmidt's older, can't-play-basketball brother. 
    
    I meant to ask, who does this guy play for?  I don't follow the NCAA
    game until the tourney.  Does UMASS get national coverage?
77.419DYPSS1::ROPERStrawberry Fields ForeverThu Jan 27 1994 17:523
    He plays for DePaul Mike.
    
    - Rope
77.4201st half killed U-Mass!!SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedFri Jan 28 1994 10:254
    U-Mass lost by 2 last night. It was a good comeback coming from 20 or
    more pts behind but they came out on the short end...
    
                        stig
77.421Had to be the longest game of the year...KALVIN::MORGANFri Jan 28 1994 11:517
    What's the story with Mike Williams?  He collapsed about halfway
    through the game.
    
    Helluva comeback by the Minutemen, but it's tough overcoming that kind
    of deficit on a hostile court.
    
    					Steve
77.422probably heart???SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedFri Jan 28 1994 12:134
    I heard he went to the hospital for tests and found out that he was
    OK...Sound Familiar????
    
                   stig
77.423GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Jan 28 1994 12:1623
         For perhaps the fourth time in the last six games UMASS put forth
    a Jekyll and Hyde effort, and came out on the short end of a 76 to 74
    score with Cincinnati.  Down by as much as 22 points in the first half,
    they began the second half with an 18-5 run, and climbed back into the
    game.  Down the stretch Cincinnati hits some threes and 90% of their
    free throws and held off UMASS.
    
         More so than the loss, UMASS fans this morning are very concerned
    about the health of second leading scorer, Mike Williams, who collapsed
    in the open court, midway through the second half.  Later he was able
    to walk from the court, but was taken to a local hospital for
    observation.  The whole episode was frightingly similar to the tragic
    collapse of Reggie Lewis during last years playoffs.  According to 
    newspaper reports this morning, Lewis complained to attending doctors,
    of "suffering dizziness on the court", just prior to his collapse.
    About five minutes prior to going down, Williams had been hammered on
    a drive to the basket, and perhaps the hard foul led to the later
    problems.
    
    Russ
    
    - almost ready to cast his vote for UCONN as the No.1 in New England.
      BTW have they played a Top 20 yet?
77.424USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Fri Jan 28 1994 12:183
    Williams was dehydrated, he will be just fine...
    
    REK
77.425UMass Thoughts...STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Jan 28 1994 12:4679
      Someone at work told me that some radio station this morning
      said that Mike Williams suffered from dehydration.  Sure hope
      thats all it was.
    
      I still find it hard to believe that UMass sometimes shoots so
      poorly.  I can't help but think the problem is something between
      the ears and coaching ought to improve this kind of thing.  I mean
      its not one game, its a pattern I've seen for awhile - even going
      back to Syracuse two years ago in the tournament when they couldn't
      get a shot to go down to save their lives!  Then Kentucky in the
      1st half.  I don't know...I never heard of a team so repeatedly
      have tremendous shooting slumps.
    
      But, the second half comeback sure was enjoyable to behold.  They
      were on a mission and just ran out of gas.  (Dirden didn't help.
      He had at least 9 pts in the last 2 minutes including that three
      pointer...he wouldn't let Cincinnatti lose.)
    
      I noticed a couple things...just observations, maybe some are
      incorrect...
    
      1) Paddio has incredibly quick hands.  He could probably steal the
         ball from me at my end and go down for a layup before I even
         realized I no longer had the ball!!!
         By the way, was it just me or did it seem that later on the
         umps simply disallowed Paddio from trying to steal.  There were
         times he'd reach in and I swear I couldn't see that he touched
         ANYTHING sometimes (ball or hand) and they just kept blowing the
         whistle.  (I might be talking about Traveiso...I get them mixed
         up.  I'm talking about the reserve guard that knocked in the real
         long three.)
    
         One other thing...he can flat out shoot.  Sometimes UMass ought 
         to design plays for him to hoist threes.
    
         By the way...I'm not sure I agree with Tommy (Brydie) because of
         the experience factor, but I kind of like this guy better than
         Kellog too, although Kellog played a good game.  But, I still
         just feel that Kellog doesn't want to score.  I think there's
         a difference between not wanting to score and being a ball-hog
         and Kellog almost pervades an atmosphere that he flat out doesn't
         want to score.  That's the way it feels to me anyway.  Besides
         that though, this guy Paddio is lightning quick.  That quickness
         on the floor can only help.  
    
      2) Camby can PASS!!!  Man, he had a few good ones.  UMass definitely
         went to some x's and o's at halftime because they were consistently
         finding Camby down low at the left baseline and typically some-
         one (usually Roe) was wide open just to the right of the basket.
         Really nice execution there with real good passing from Camby.
    
         Too bad Camby isn't massive, but hey...you can't have everything.
         Going off on a tangent...being from Wisconsin (but liking UMass
         more as I went to school there) Rashard Griffith is a force at 
         7'1" and he's big!  not sure why I mention this, but I saw Wisconsin
         against Illinois this week.  I guess I mention this because Griffith 
         was one of the other few real good high school recruits out of 
         center last year.
    
      3) Bright is coming along!
    
      4) UMass is still as scrappy as a team can be and probably just 
         about as athletic.
    
         I figure UMass drops out of the top 10.  Louisville is sure to
         go above them at least.  They don't belong in the top 10 when
         they consistently play as they have the last four games; De Paul
         (loss), Rutgers (pathetic first half at home), George Washington
         (pathetic first half, should have lost, at home), Cincinnatti
         (pathetic first half, loss).  Excuse me, but what are these
         teams ranked anyway???
    
         Well, here's to Williams truly being ok and UMass somehow finding
         a way to improve mentally.  I really think its mainly between
         the ears!  And I have to believe that coaching plays a part in 
         determining the number of times a team goes into these shooting
         funks.  There's some kind of pattern here.
    
                                                         Tony
77.426URI on Sunday...KALVIN::MORGANFri Jan 28 1994 17:0910
    Cincy was at #20 and GW is probably a top 25 team.  THE GLOBE said that
    Calipari will be making some changes in the starting lineup.  Mentioned
    something about Roe starting out on the bench.  This would probably
    open up a slot for Nunez to start.
    
    The commentators were talking about the "solid game" Kellogg played last
    night, but you need more than 5 points from a guy that probably plays
    30 minutes a game.
    
    					Steve
77.427UConn got creamed by Ohio U. (who?) for their only lossTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Jan 31 1994 17:2423
    Spectacular performance by UMass yesterday as they rolled over URI
    76-47.  Marcus Camby continues to show that he's the real deal, with
    15 points, 11 rebounds, and 6 blocks, some of which were simply
    breathtaking!  He also had 3 assists, including a nifty feed in the
    middle of a 3-on-2 fast break, where he hit Donta Bright on the fly
    for the jam.  Then Camby had an incredible alley-oop jam, one handed,
    where he grabbed the ball over a defender and thundered it in with
    the same motion.
    
    This win was even more impressive considering Lou Roe was a non-factor
    most of the game (didn't start, got 3 quick fouls when he went in) and
    Mike Williams is still undergoing tests at UMass Medical Center. 
    Padilla started and had a terrific game, and fellow fereshman Carmelo
    Travieso played well off the bench.
    
    Tough stretch coming up for UMass:  
    
    	Thurs. 2/3	Florida State
    	Sun. 2/6	Kentucky (at the Meadowlands)
    	Thurs. 2/10	at URI (where UMass lost last year)
    	Sun 2/13	Temple
    
    NAZZ
77.428Nice Game To SeeSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Jan 31 1994 18:0429
      Well, thanks to Russ having two tickets available to me, I
      was able to see the Minutemen yesterday.
    
      It was a nice game to watch.  It was fairly close until about
      midway through the first half at which point the defense really
      rattled URI and Camby was just awesome.  As Nazz said, he had
      a couple good jams with the alleyoop being incredible.  He was
      simply all over the court playing every facet of the game.  I
      can't imagine any other player of his height moving as we as 
      he does.
    
      As mentioned, Williams didn't dress.  Boy, I sure hope he'll 
      be ok.  Clearly, it is not for sure that it was just dehydration.
    
      Padilla again really impressed.  So quick.  You can't leave him 
      alone.  Good passer.  He had some nifty passing with Roe.  Bright
      also looked really good.
    
      It ws just a real good effort with defensive intensity pretty
      much continuous.
    
      Roe got three early fouls and wasn't that much of a factor.
    
      The only negatives were Williams not suited and foul shooting 
      which was absolutely horrendous.
    
      A very enjoyable game to watch.
    
                                                 Tony
77.429Williams/Oversubstituting?JUNCO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Feb 01 1994 11:5718
      Today's Globe says that Williams is undergoing further
      tests.  It also said that where some of the tests showed
      indication of heart abnormality in the cases of Reggie 
      Lewis and Hank Gathers, tests have shown no abnormality
      for Williams.  Also mentioned was that Williams ran into
      the base of the basket after going for a layup prior to
      his collapse.  The doctor's are wondering if the impact
      to his chest may have somehow caused the collapse.
    
      One thing I meant to mention about the UMass game against
      URI...Calipari substituted a lot.  He seemed to substitute 
      about every minute.  Hey, what do I know, but I think he
      oversubstituted.  I mean, doesn't that work to the detriment
      of continuity on the floor when you're substituting like
      mad?  I mean leave the same five (or at least the same 4 out
      of five) for a good 6 to 8 minutes now and then!
    
                                              Tony
77.430If it's good enough for Calipari it oughta be good enough.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Feb 01 1994 12:007
    re: Tony
    
    Ya win by ~30 and you're complaining about the coaching?  Sounds like
    the Dean-bashing I've grown accustomed to over the years ....
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.431Just One Part...JUNCO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Feb 01 1994 14:1511
      re: ACC Chris
    
        Just one aspect of his coaching and I left myself the open
        that I might not know what I'm talking about.
    
        Sure you have to sub a lot in order to retain defensive 
        intensity and so there's a balance, but I still have a notion
        that once in awhile its beneficial to have the same group
        play continuous minutes.
    
                                                 Tony
77.432Calipari cain coach and should be given benefit of doubt.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Feb 01 1994 14:3910
    Tony you are correct in the "Just One Part" analysis.  I've been down
    this "over-substituting" route a thousand times.  At times I've been
    critical of Dean for this, but then I look at his record and have to
    come to grips with the fact that I'm in absolutely no position to
    criticize the man.
    
    I suggest the same applies for you and Calipari.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.43338346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 01 1994 15:084
77.434I Don't Know That I Don't Know!!STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Feb 01 1994 16:267
      Chris, I just don't know.  I'm just not certain I'm wrong!  ;-)
    
      By the way, during the game, the announcer said that Calipari
      has his own radio show.  The next time its on is Wed. evening
      I think at 8, but I'm not sure of the time.  Its on at 99.3 FM.
    
                                                    Tony
77.435You're WRONG Tony. ;^)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Feb 01 1994 17:111
    
77.436Seriously though ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Feb 01 1994 18:0112
    Seriously though Tony, ain't it great to know you've got a guy at the
    helm who you can confidently state knows more about the game
    than you do?  That you can fully put your trust in?
    
    I have confidence in a bunch of A10 coaches to "do the right thing",
    but I'm having a darned time of it trying to think of *any* 
    BigLeast coaches deserving of similar trust.
    
    Haw haw haw!!!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.437You wont be cold coming in the game...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedWed Feb 02 1994 00:224
    I think substituting a lot can benefit in some ways. It can keep
    everybody mentally ready...
    
                 stig
77.438Yeah...What Do We Know??? (not much)JUNCO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Feb 02 1994 17:1319
      re: .436
    
        Chris,
    
          I don't know much about the Big L(east) coaches, but I
          was at the UMass/Syracuse tournament game two years ago
          and Boeheim is just one of the biggest looking cry-babies
          I have ever seen!!  It was beautiful to behold him as UMass
          carried the victory!!
    
          Boeheim's pretty incredible.
    
          My bet is that Calhoun is probably a real good coach though.
    
          And, yeah...I'm sure those coaches know things about the
          game that we have never even conceived of.  What we know and
          what they know must be like apples and oranges.
    
                                                Tony
77.439CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopWed Feb 02 1994 17:306
    
>>          My bet is that Calhoun is probably a real good coach though.
  
 better recruiter than coach like the majority of the lot....

 mikey
77.440METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballWed Feb 02 1994 17:445
>> better recruiter than coach like the majority of the lot....

 and of course Smiffy is the primo example of this.

The Crazy Met
77.441CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 17:5512
I don't know where Calhoun is such a bad coach.

He's got 400 victories under his belt, and he's turned UConn COMPLETELY
around during his tenure there.  I can remember the days of Dom Perno
where the team sucked big time.  

Now they're competitive and nationally ranked and in the hunt.

No complaints here....


'Saw
77.442I Think Calhoun's Good TooSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Feb 03 1994 11:568
      re: -1
    
        Yeah, I agree.  That UConn team the year they miraculously
        beat Clemson and barely lost to Duke had one awesome defense;
        the kind of defense that cannot be only talent-driven, but 
        must reflect some mighty fine coaching.
    
                                                   Tony
77.443than why do the Hoyas usually tar and feather them?CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 03 1994 12:5216
    
>        Yeah, I agree.  That UConn team the year they miraculously
>        beat Clemson and barely lost to Duke had one awesome defense;
>        the kind of defense that cannot be only talent-driven, but 
>        must reflect some mighty fine coaching.
    
 
 Yabbut (to steal Kev's line) if that awesome defense was a sign of his
 coaching why did it disappear the next few season when he lost the 
 athletes to run that system? This year he's got those type of athletes
 back and the defense has improved again for him. 

 He's not a terrible coach but anybody who can be outcoached by Thompson
 continously has to be suspect imo......

 mikey
77.444KALI::MORGANFri Feb 04 1994 11:047
    UMASS nipped FSU last night by 4.  They didn't take the lead for good
    until there was about a minute left in the game.  They'll never get by
    Kentucky Sunday unless they pretty much play a perfect game.  Things
    wouldn't be so dire if Mike Williams were available.  Hope for the best
    on Sunday.  It's on ABC at 1:30.
    
    					Steve
77.445To listen to crowd you've thought this game was 1 vs 2CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopFri Feb 04 1994 11:189
 
 and all the tests they've ruin on Williams so far have come up negative,
 thanks the stars above. He may play sunday they said....

 both teams sure missed alot of bunnies last night. UMASS better get a
 whole lot better at the foul line or it's going to kill them in March.
 Good thing they hit the glass like to do to vercome this shortcoming.

 mike
77.446GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Feb 04 1994 11:5861
         A few thoughts on last night's game:
    
    - Due to the tough driving conditions, I arrived three minutes after
      tip-off, and Nazz didn't make it to his seat until nearly half time.
      Supposedly the crowd (which was in March Madness form) serrenaded
      Charlie Ward with "CFL", "CFL", "CFL" during the warmups.  Later,
      during the player intro's however, they gave him a wonderful ovation.
    
    - Amen to the free throw shooting.  9 for 24 just doesn't cut it in 
      the Top 20.  In way of comparison, I watched the second half of a
      local high school game the other night on cable (Groton-Dunstable
      and Lunenburg), and witnessed player after player step to the charity
      stripe and drill free throws.  Two nights later, I watch these
      great athletes in Amherst clang freebie after freebie.  How do you
      figure?
    
    - I thought the refereeing was very shakey throughout, although neither
      team seemed to derive an advantage from it.  Nazz remarked that the
      crew was regarded as one of the NCAA's better trios, but that they
      couldn't get a job in the NBA.
    
    - Although there has been some call within this note to start Padilla
      in front of Kellogg, its a sentiment that I never have agreed with.
      In my opinion, Kellogg was the key to the win last night, as he 
      played very nice "d" on Ward, hit a couple of threes, and didn't
      make many bad decisions when running the team from the point. 
      Padilla is a very good freshman, and more flashy than Kellogg, but
      he makes his share of freshman mistakes.
    
    - Calipari commented on the post game radio show, that he thought the
      team played flawless basketball over the last three minutes and that
      was the key to the victory.  Also he mentioned that since Florida St.
      only plays 7 people, they wore out down the stretch (plus Reid fouled
      out), and Camby and Roe were finally able to get some inside baskets.
    
    - Both Nazz and I couldn't understand why Pat Kennedy didn't put UMASS
      on the free throw line in the final minutes, given their horrid
      shooting percentage.
    
    - Calipari said there was a very small chance that Williams could play
      against Kentucky, but both announcers discounted his remark. 
      Williams had two angiogram procedures which involved inserting an
      instrument into the major artery in the thigh, and running it up into
      his heart, and as a result is very sore from the procedure.  Calipari
      did say that while it is reassuring that the doctors found no
      problems with the heart, there remains concern over the lack of
      explanation for the fainting episode.
    
    - The line before the game last night, favored UMASS anywhere from
      12 to 19 points.  The oddsmakers in Vegas must not have been on top
      of the Williams injury or the shooting slump UMASS has been mired in.
    
    - Now that the UMASS crowd is finally rounding into form, I can't wait
      for the Temple game on Feb. 13th.  Now that's a team UMASS really
      gets up for.  We stood for much of the second half last night. 
      Against Temple, no one will sit down from the time the players are
      introduced.
    
    Russ 
    
             
77.447GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Feb 04 1994 12:166
         Oh yeah, one other thing.  UMASS now has a 3 and 0 record against
    the ACC this season.  Given how shakey UMASS plays, that record alone
    tells me that the Big 10 is the premier B-Ball conference in the
    country this year, with the Great Midwest a close second ;^)!!
    
    Russ
77.448MSE1::FRANCUSReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballFri Feb 04 1994 13:205
    ABC must have changed their rule since it will be on channel 5 in
    Boston which usually does not carry College hoops on Sunday.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.449UMass unbeaten at home for mare than two years!TNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthFri Feb 04 1994 13:2027
    Just to amplify on a couple of points my good buddy Russ said:
    
    What was Pat Kennedy thinking with 51.9 seconds left, down 4?  He let
    UMass run down the entire 35 second clock rather than send them to the
    line.  Was he afraid of an offensive rebound/basket?  The way UMass was
    shooting free throws, FSU coulda fouled ANYBODY and expected at least
    one miss.
    
    Paparo, Lembo, and Donato were absolutely horrendous for both teams
    last night.  Only Bobby Sura for FSU was allowed to use a head fake.
    Anybody else got called for a travel.  The called guys out of bounds
    who never even touched the end line.  They let FSU's big guys manhandle
    Marcus Camby all night, but only call stupid touch fouls.  Paparo
    called an offensive foul on Kellogg (his 4th) for leaning in with his
    shoulder on a shot, but it was his right shoulder!  How can you clear a
    guy out and shoot at the same time?  Finally, they screwed FSU out of
    two seconds at the end of the game.  Since the clock stops after every
    basket in the final minute, they could have reset the clock after the
    UMass clock violation to 16.9 seconds, but they never even bothered,
    and FSU got the ball with only 14.7 seconds left.  IF Ward or Sura made
    one of those desperation 3-pointers, that 2.2 seconds could have been
    meaningful.
    
    I'll say it once again:  as bad as the NBA refs are, they are
    lightyears better than the best the NCAA has to offer.
    
    NAZZ
77.45038346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 04 1994 13:325
77.451MSE1::FRANCUSReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballFri Feb 04 1994 14:198
    UMASS was on ABC last year for one game. Channle 5 wanted to broadcast
    that game. However, since they did not show the hoops every Sunday, ABC
    refused to let them show just that one game. It makes perfect sense for
    channel 5 to show the game, we are in agreement on that; ABC must have
    changed or amended its position from last year.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.452Umass game certainly exciting...AKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billFri Feb 04 1994 15:1433
    Nazz and Russ, glad you were able to make a very exciting game even if
    the pace produced some awkward basketball.
    
    As for the ref'ing - totally awful I agree and I made same observation
    that refs are watching everything but the feet for traveling.  I gave
    up even thinking about them as my blood pressure would have gone off
    the scale.  nba refs are indeed much more highly skilled (there's a but
    deleted since it's another note discussion entirely).
    
    Is Calipari so rigid in his game plans that his players are simply
    frozen to his instructions.  Padilla had several open 10 footers which
    he passed up only to see Kellogg throwing the 3 pointers.  Of course
    umass outside shooting is awful and kennedy knew it so he packed the
    middle and baseline daring Padilla to shoot which he finally did and
    fsu had to come out - but this finally took place in the middle of the
    half.
    	At which time I had to go pick up young Phil at babysitters but I
    had decided that umass would prevail despite hopeless foul and outside
    shooting.   The cause?
    
    	They are too hyped up  - Calipari has to slow their tempo down,
    make them work for shots and relax them somehow.
    
    	Even though the players had all the div 1 skills the game played a
    lot like high school with bumping, missed 12-15 footers, .40 foul
    shooting (or was it less).
    
    	Good news - Roe is back but against the packed defense fsu played
    it was impossible for him to display many skills early but he "had it".
    
    	Russ, can you imagine a team giving bc all those open < 15' shots. 
    
    	I'll throw a smile in on that one :-)
77.453KALI::MORGANFri Feb 04 1994 16:0910
    Bill,
    
    I don't know where he stands now, but prior to this week, Kellogg led
    the A10 in 3-point FG %.  For the past two years Calipari has wanted
    him to shoot MORE, which has also been the cry in here.
    
    It would be nice if they had their only consistent outside shooter for
    Sunday's game.
    
    					Steve
77.454GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Feb 04 1994 16:2640
    Re: 452
    
         Going into this season, I thought UMASS' inexperience (youth) and
    lack of an unabashed scorer would be its longterm downfall.  I have
    been pleasantly surprised by their grittiness and refuse to lose
    attitude.  Now, I think their achilles heel(s) is/are their lack of
    a scorer and their lack of a widebody inside who can rough up the
    opposition a bit to make Roe's and Camby's lives a bit easier.  I 
    think Roe's recent slump has resulted from the load he has been asked
    to carry.
    
         Regarding Padilla passing up open short jumpers ..... I think
    high schoolers making the transition to Division 1 are consistantly
    amazed at the quickness necessary to be able to pull the trigger at
    the the higher level, and not have the ball swatted back in one's face.
    Case in point is Carmelo Travieso.  Travieso was the Massachusetts High
    School Player of the Year last year, and regarded as one of the better
    long range shooters entering the college ranks.  I saw him play last
    year, and watched him score a cool 35 points, most from NBA 3 point
    range, in about 25 minutes of playing time.  To watch him this season,
    he's like a different person.  He's more hesitant to shoot than
    Padilla, his ball handling is suspect, and he generally appears not
    to have a clue regarding UMASS' offensive scheme.  Of course I could
    make the latter statement about most of the team ;^).  I attribute it
    all to his inability to deal with the quickness of the people guarding
    him.  Down the road, I expect him to be a quality collegiate basketball
    player.
    
         I have heard Calipari state in interviews that he has been
    surprised by this teams poor shooting percentage .... the implication
    being that they must shoot better in practice.  One of these days
    they will have a breakthrough game, where they hit 65% from the floor
    and 85% from the line.  It would be very nice if it happens on one
    or both of the next two Sunday afternoons.  (Kentucky & Temple)
    
    Russ
    
    - Bill, I'd love to take in a BC-UMASS matchup with you from high
      above courtside.  You would not believe how worked up I get when
      viewing the Eagles in person.  I would do John Hendry proud!
77.455MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Feb 04 1994 16:5529
   >> Although there has been some call within this note to start Padilla
   >> in front of Kellogg, its a sentiment that I never have agreed with.
   >> In my opinion, Kellogg was the key to the win last night, as he 
     
      I think I'm Padilla's biggest booster in here and my opinion has
      been that *eventually* Padilla should edge Kellogg out for the
      starting PG job (probably next year). Kellogg *was* crucial last
      night. He had a few of good dishes in the lane. He played his
      usual scrappy defense and he was careful with the ball as always.
      But, other than William's who is out, Padilla strikes me as the
      only guy who can score from anywhere on the floor. Kellogg sure
      can't. John Bobbitt can penetrate better than Derek Kellogg can.
      And Kellogg may lead the A-10 in three point % but I think that
      may be largely because he doesn't take one unless he's completely
      wide open. I hope Williams is alright because he is my favorite
      UMass player but his injury will give Edgar Padilla some valuable
      playing time and I think the kid will start to shine.
    
      
      BTW - when you watch UMass and UConn, I see what a real hoops
            hotbed the state of Connecticut is. UMass has gotten where 
            they are due largely to players from Insuranceland and so
            has UConn. Connecticut high school b-ball doesn't have the
            rep or the attendant hysteria that you expect from Ken-
            tucky or Indiana but the state doesn't have to take a backseat 
            to anybody in terms of bonafide-studs-per-square-inch.
    
             
    
77.456bc-uconn at conte next wed.AKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billFri Feb 04 1994 16:5612
    Russ,
    	You make a good point about adjusting to quickness in college. 
    Padilla though was not being challenged but had a different strategy in
    mind.  Good to see Kellogg shooting, its obvious that its become the
    strategy for dealing with umass - make the guards beat you from
    outside.
    
    	UCONN-BC next Wednesday at Conte.  Should we make the kp plans?
    Don't know about tix availablity.  I'll oil up my pacemaker and stock
    up on the bp pills.
    
    bill
77.457CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Feb 04 1994 16:598
Tommy,  you're right about HS hoops down here in CT.  There's a lot of
fine players and some really good teams.

I cannot elaborate, because I'm not as much of a hoops fan as I am other
sports, but I do know that much....


'Saw
77.458Name was Mark BelangerAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billFri Feb 04 1994 17:049
    It was far more obvious when the old New England Basketball tourney was
    held after the old tech tourney finished.  But that ended in the early
    60s.
    
    Last ne tourney I recall feature a tremendous guard from pittsfield
    mass that disappeared somehow and never made the big college or nba
    splash we all would've expected.
    
    
77.459DECWET::METZGER14 days...Fri Feb 04 1994 17:0816
It was nice to see the team play last night. Both my wife and I were disgusted
at the low free throw shooting %. If they don't start hitting some more of
those they'll just get hacked to death come March by the teams that have plenty
of fouls to give.

They also missed a lot of bunnies. They really need 1 consistant outside
shooter that they can kick the ball out to to make the defense play them honest.

Does Calipari sit down for even 1 second during the games?

The out-law squad is going to MSG for the game. Sometimes it's not fun to be 3k
miles away from the family. Mother-out-law is springing for the tickets for the
family...ugh...

Metz
77.460Great entertainment, but...KALI::MORGANMon Feb 07 1994 11:2016
    Chalk that one up for the experience.  Padilla played an excellent
    game as did the whole team.  Definitely missed Mike Williams but the
    time Padilla logged in his place will only help down the line.  Roe was
    unstoppable.
    
    You could say that the FT shooting killed them again, but Kentucky
    clanged their share as well.  But it is frightening to watch these guys
    trying to shoot a 15 foot shot.  Reminds me of some of Jim Boheim's
    teams.
    
    Two losses in four games, with URI coming up next at Providence, and
    Temple on Sunday.  I'd be dissapointed if they didn't win these two
    games.  They need to beat a team like Temple, after a loss like
    yesterday's.
    
    					Steve
77.461Pintino wasn't as animated as I've seen...CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopMon Feb 07 1994 11:4710
Tough Loss but in a refreshing change of politics, Calapri took the blame
for the loss. He noted that not only did he have Kellogg and Padilla playing
the wrong posistions at the end of the game (Kellogg with his experience
should have been at the point, Padilla with his hot hand at the SG) he
also saw with about 13 seconds that Padilla was confused and should have
grapped a TO. If Lou Roe played all his games on national TV people would
be talking about him in lottery instead of a late 1st or early 2nd rounder.

mike
77.462Had To Miss It (Bummer!)STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Feb 07 1994 12:3829
      I didn't get to see the game having had to go to a wedding,
      but it sure looks like UMass plays to the level of the competition,
      doesn't it?
    
      Since I didn't see it, I don't have anything to offer except to
      say that Bob Ryan's article in the Globe today on UMass is 
      an example of why he is my favorite columnist.  Really excellent
      article on our good 'ol State U.
    
      Tommy, I think I pretty much agree exactly with you on Padilla.
      Its no knock on Kellog who must be good to be a starting player
      on a top 15 team.  Basically, as a freshman, Padilla seems to me
      to be incredibly composed and I feel that he is more of a shooting
      threat.  The other thing though...he strikes me as being incredibly
      quick; probably the quickest hands on the team.  I figure maybe he'll
      edge Kellog in minutes at some point, but right now with his 
      experience, Kellog's the man.
    
      By the way...as far as a big physical body...why not throw Meyers
      in there?  Let him just pound and pound and pound until he has
      3 fouls.  (I don't mean play every minute, but be in there now and
      then and POUND.)
    
      Who cares if he's at three fouls with three minutes to play?
    
      Say, if UMass did shoot well (field and at the line), they might
      be frightening!                                     
    
                                                      Tony
77.463Thought they had it won...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 07 1994 12:459
    There is plenty of blame to go around (if assigning it is an issue;
    it's still early and I don't think the "L" is that big a deal) as UMass 
    parlayed a very comfortable game position with ~2 minutes to go into
    the worst stretch of basketball they played all game, and hence the
    loss.  Some poor shot selection after they reached that point...
    
    glenn
    
77.464MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Feb 07 1994 15:1226
   >> UMass parlayed a very comfortable game position with ~2 minutes 
   >> to go into

      Naturally, I'd rather be up by 4 than down by 4 with ~2 minutes to
      to go but that's hardly a "very comfortable game position" against a
      team that hoists up the threes like Kentucky does. UMass made some
      mistakes at the end of this game but all of them are correctable and
      some will correct themselves with experience. All in all, there really
      were more positives than negatives from a UMass fan's standpoint. Edgar
      Padilla showed glimpses of just how good he'll eventually be. He made
      some ballhandling mistakes near the end of the game but he probably 
      shouldn't have even been put in a position to make them. Camby looked
      huge on the defensive end. Marcus has a real shot blocker's instinct.
      His block on what Rhodes (?) thought would be an easy layup was too
      sweet. These two freshmen get better and better with every game and
      these games with tournament atmosphere can only speed their develop-
      ment. The rest of the team was solid as usual but they really needed a
      perimeter shooter to step up and neither Traveiso or Kellogg did. I
      have to agree with whoever said that Traveiso looks like he may not 
      have the confidence right now to play well at this level. He really 
      looks lost at times out there. I like Meyer the backup center, though. 
      He's awkard and a bit ham-handed on offense but he's a scrapper and has
      decent timing as a shot blocker. He gives good hard minutes whenever
      he's out there. This team is going to wrealk some havoc in this year's 
      tourney but next year I expect them to be a preseason Top 5 and to make 
      a run at the whole enchilada.
77.465CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopMon Feb 07 1994 15:225
 Oh No!!! Please delete .464 quick Tommy. Your KOD is reaching Dismore-ian
 proportions....

 ;^)
77.466NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 07 1994 16:2618
                      
   >> UMass parlayed a very comfortable game position with ~2 minutes 
   >> to go into
   >
   >   Naturally, I'd rather be up by 4 than down by 4 with ~2 minutes to
   >   to go but that's hardly a "very comfortable game position" against a
   >   team that hoists up the threes like Kentucky does.   UMass made some
   >   mistakes at the end of this game but all of them are correctable and
   >   some will correct themselves with experience.
    
    Yeah, I didn't mean to make it sound like a lock, but teams in that
    position win the game probably 80+% of the time.  But, as you say,
    UMass may actually learn as much from the end of this game as if they'd
    won.  Such a loss in the NCAAs would have to be characterized as a
    heartbreaker, though... 
    
    glenn
      
77.467DYPSS1::ROPERCan't Buy Me LoveMon Feb 07 1994 16:415
    UMASS apparently ran into the same kind of drought (sp?) at the end of
    the game as UK did in the first half.  UMASS was held scoreless the
    last 3 minutes of the contest.
    
    - Rope
77.468METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Mon Feb 07 1994 16:473
so this was an excellent loss??

The Crazy Met
77.469Game couldn't have been closerTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthMon Feb 07 1994 17:1420
    Some amazing stats for this game:
    
    FG:  UMass 24-59; Ky 24-60
    FT:  UMass 14-22; Ky 14-21
    OR:  UMass 17     Ky 17
    DR:  UMass 23     Ky 23
    Tot: UMass 40     Ky 40
    TO:  UMass 16     Ky 17
    
    Jeff Brassow was a real killer, going 3-3 in 3-pointers.  I thought
    Kellogg and Padilla played terrific defense on Travis Ford.  One thing
    Camby has to learn is that once the guard recovers after he
    jump-switches out, he's got to hurry back down low.  Twice he got
    caught wandering at the top of the key, and the second time it cost him
    when Prickett hit the lay-up all alone underneath.  But that's
    something he can learn; his shotblocking ability is a natural gift.
    
    With Mike Williams, this is a game UMass could have won.
    
    NAZZ
77.470RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 07 1994 17:2012
    > With Mike Williams, this is a game UMass could have won.
    
    Now if I were to make a statement like this every noter in the
    Northern Hemisphere would be jumping outa their keyboards, claiming it
    was yet another "excuse" from some devilish "bible".
    
    Personally, I'd much rather have UNC face UMass again than Kaintucky. 
    The 'Cats scare me; I honestly couldn't see the HourMen beating us
    twice in a season.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.471Big East Gobbling Up Atlantic 10?ESKIMO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Feb 07 1994 19:2611
      I heard on WEEI over lunch that its a lock that the Big East
      is going to add four teams to its conference; Temple, West
      Virginia, Rutgers, and Virginia Tech (for basketball).
    
      What would that do to the Atlantic 10?  (Kill it.)  What would
      that do to UMass?   Where would UMass want to go if the Atl. 10
      folded?
    
                                              Tony
    
      
77.472Now That's Conservative Prognosticating!ESKIMO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Feb 07 1994 19:276
      re: .469
    
      That was pretty safe to say figuring that without Mike Williams
      they could have won!
    
                                                  Tony
77.473maybe the Great MidwestWMOIS::BALL_KTue Feb 08 1994 12:0021
     Re: Big East Gobbling Up Atlantic 10? 

      I've heard the same thing from a number of sources.  They say its
      the football schools driving the decision, but it seems like an
      obvious move to eliminate the increasing basketball competition the
      Atlantic 10 has been giving them the last few years (dirty pool ?)

      I've heard (and I hope its true) that UMASS will join the Great Midwest
      which would be a much better option than staying in a league
      that is destined to sink into oblivion (another "north atlantic" type
      conference). But its hard to imagine the GM taking too many of the
      remaining teams from the Atlantic 10, besides
      maybe George Washington (who would probably make a nice replacement
      for Virginia Tech in the Metro). The other teams will probably be 
      forced to jion other weaker leagues. 


						K.B.
				
      

77.474Wonder if Calipari's got his resume up to date? Heh heh!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Feb 08 1994 12:151
    
77.475MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Feb 08 1994 13:0412
   >> -< Wonder if Calipari's got his resume up to date?  Heh heh! >-
    
      Coach Cal was given a contract extention through the year 2000
      just recently. He's going to be here for a while. Amherst is in
      a really beautiful part of the state and he says he loves the
      area. And not every coach is a greed head like certain a Jimmy
      Durante look-alike I could name. Outcoaching Deano this year
      had to show coach Cal that he could actually get to the prom-
      ised land from here, he just wouldn't be paid as much to do it
      as he would at North Carolina or Kentucky or other places where 
      their priorities are way out of whack.
    
77.476A-10 will change, probably for the betterTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthTue Feb 08 1994 13:1146
    I've heard a couple of possible scenarios:
    
    1) The remaining six A-10 teams join the Great Midwest, making that
       the second strongest basketball conference behind the Big Ten.
       Here's how that would look:
    	
    	A-10 Teams	Great Midwest
    	UMass           Ala.-Birmingham
    	George Wash.    Cincinnati
    	Duquesne	DePaul
    	St. Joseph's	Marquette
    	St. Bona.	Memphis State
    	URI		St. Louis
    
    2) The remaining six A-10 teams join the six remaining teams in the
       Metro conference.  Virginia Tech going to the Big East would leave
       them with six teams.  Here's how that would look:
    
       A-10 Teams	Metro
       UMass		Louisville
       George Wash.	NC-Charlotte
       Duquesne		Southern Miss.
       St. Joseph's	South Florida
       St. Bona.	Tulane
       URI		VCU
    
       Another very strong conference, not quite as strong as the first.
    
    3) A-10 remains as is, but adds individual teams.
    
       Some of the teams considered for inclusion (not in the two leagues
       listed above):
    
    		1. LaSalle (Midwestern Conference)
    		2. Xavier (O) (Midwestern Conference)
    		3. Manhattan (Metro Atlantic)
    		4. OLd Dominion (Colonial)
    		5. Richmond (Colonial)
    		6. Marshall (Southern)
    		7. Cleveland State (Mid-Contintent)
    		
    I sincerely doubt that the A-10 will dissolve, but will continue to
    provide top quality basketball for many years to come.
    
    NAZZ
    	
77.477Vague remembrancesCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Feb 08 1994 14:279
    I think Chris was sarcastically referring to the alleged
    "blackballing" of Calipari in the Big East, no??
    
    Back to his days at Pittsburgh under Evans when he stole that kid
    from Villanova.. what was his name?  Supposedly, the Big East don't
    like Coach Cal too much..
    
    MikeL
    
77.478Great Midwest Looks GoodSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Feb 08 1994 14:4215
      re: .476
    
        My first thought with UMass should this happen was for them
        to jump to the Great Midwest.  That's a pretty good looking
        conference.  But, without West Virginia, Rutgers, and Temple,
        I think the Atlantic 10 is too weak.
    
        I think part of the Big East agenda is to go after the Atl 10
        including UMass.  BTW, I heard that UMass is going to go to
        1-A football (not reliable source - someone from work).  Why
        not them go to Big East?  Of course, playing Miami in football
        would be a tad ridiculous, but no more ridiculous than Temple
        playing them.
    
                                                      Tony
77.479VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDTonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkankTue Feb 08 1994 15:276
    	I'll give the BigLeast credit for not being stupid.  They realized
    the Atlantic 10 is a better conference and by gutting it now can
    eliminate trouble down the road.  Too bad because the Temple/UMASS
    games the last three years have been great to watch.
    
    				/Don
77.480more Great Midwest theoriesWMOIS::BALL_KTue Feb 08 1994 15:3424
 >    
 >    1) The remaining six A-10 teams join the Great Midwest, making that
 >       the second strongest basketball conference behind the Big Ten.
 >       Here's how that would look:
 >    	
 >    	A-10 Teams	Great Midwest
 >    	UMass           Ala.-Birmingham
 >    	George Wash.    Cincinnati
 >    	Duquesne	DePaul
 >    	St. Joseph's	Marquette
 >    	St. Bona.	Memphis State
 >    	URI		St. Louis
 >


    I find it hard to believe that the Great Midwest, which seem like THE
    up and coming conference in the country, would want to pick up 
    "dead-weight" teams like St. Bona and Duquesne (I was amazed when the 
    A-10 took Duq. back). I would classify St Joe's and URI as argueable.  

   And I've also heard that Notre Dame is an additional possibility for
   both the Great Midwest or the Big East

					K.B.
77.481OPening up TV markets is the keyTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthWed Feb 09 1994 13:3111
    Notre Dame would not join the Big East beacause they will remain
    independent in football, and the Big East wants football/basketball
    schools.  
    
    Adding teams like St. Joe's and Duquesne to the Great Midwest gives
    them something they don't have now:  television markets in the East.
    Opening up New England, Philly, Pittsburgh, and Wasington instantly
    makes a Great Midwest TV package an easy sell, and for more $$$ per
    minute for advertisers.  It's a natural combination.
    
    NAZZ
77.482Finally, I like Myer tooAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billWed Feb 09 1994 19:4917
    Managed to see quite a bit of umass - kentuck.  redmen are providing a
    lot of entertaining basketball this year with Camby one of the most
    exciting players in years.
    
    Interesting comment about Roe possibly trying for 3pt play at end with
    foul but I don't see how he could count on it since by letting him lay
    it in the game is over for 'cats.  
    
    My other comment is that umass (contrary to rope) may have been better
    off with faster tempo and their run in 2nd qtr was on a fast tempo. 
    The predominant defense used against them is a packed zone and Cal
    likes to use all his players.  I didn't see the last 15 minutes but I
    suspect that it was kentucky that slowed the pace not umass and this
    strategy payed off.
    
    And a comment about NC "fearing Kentucky more than umass".  Well Deano
    would still be at 1 if he had to play ku last year.
77.483More Comments on UK-UMASSDYPSS1::ROPERIt Was 30 Years Ago Today!!!Wed Feb 09 1994 23:4456
    re .482
    
    UK defintetly didn't slow the pace.  If they wanted to slow the pace,
    they wouldn't have pressed the entire game :-).  Here are Pitino's
    exact comments after the game.
    
    "What I didn't like was the tempo of the game," Pitino said.  "But
    that's going to happen.  We could get an Alabama-Birmingham come
    playoff time.  You can get a team that's going to let you play in the
    60s.  Our style did not win out."
    
    Jared Prickett added the following:
    
    "We played their style and we came out with a victory."
    
    Someone earlier listed some of the stats.  It indeed was an extremely
    close game.  Here's a more detailed listing of the stats:
    
    FG's          - UK (24-60)  - UMASS (24-59)
    3-Pts         - UK (5-15)   - UMASS (2-9)    
    FT's          - UK (14-21)  - UMASS (14-22)
    Assists       - UK (15)     - UMASS (13)
    Turnovers     - UK (17)     - UMASS (16)
    Blocked Shots - UK (6)      - UMASS (7)
    Steals        - UK (8)      - UMASS (10) 
    
    1st Half FG%  - UK (12-34 35.3%)  - UMASS (14-36 38.9%)
    2nd Half FG%  - UK (12-26 46.2%)  - UMASS (10-23 43.5%)
    Game FG%      - UK (24-60 40.0%)  - UMASS (24-59 40.7%)
    
    1st Half 3-Pt% - UK (2-7  28.6%) - UMASS (2-6 33.3%)
    2nd Half 3-Pt% - UK (3-8  37.5%) - UMASS (0-3 0.0%)
    Game 3-Pt%     - UK (5-15 33.3%) - UMASS (2-9 22.2%)
    
    1st Half FT%   - UK (3-8 37.5%)   - UMASS (6-10 60.0%)
    2nd Half FT%   - UK (11-13 84.6%) - UMASS (8-12 66.7%)
    
    Halftime - UK 29 - UMASS 36
    Final    - UK 67 - UMASS 64
    
    Several interesting points:
    	- UK shot 11% better from the field in the 2nd half - UMASS
          improved by 5%
    
        - UK shot 47% better from the FT line in the 2nd half!
    
        - UK hit 3 more 3's which appear to be the difference in this game
    
    One thing UMASS has to be proud of is the way they handled the UK
    press.  I thought they did a good job of getting the ball up the court. 
    Both of these teams have the potential to make some serious noise in
    the NCAA tournament.
    
    
    
     - Rope
77.484MSE1::FRANCUSBilllls in '94Thu Feb 10 1994 02:206
    Well UK certainly crumbled against Arkansas after they had a 17 point
    lead. tsk. tsk.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
    
77.485Good news: Mike Williams is backTNPUBS::NAZZAROGentleness overcomes strengthThu Feb 10 1994 14:035
    Michael Williams has been cleared to play tonight against Rhode Island
    at the Providence Civic Center.  He will not start, but will get some
    time, how much depends on how he reacts on the court.
    
    NAZZ
77.486Makes Me Think of William HerndonESKIMO::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Feb 10 1994 18:5011
      re: .483
     
        Do any of you remember how UMass handled the Kentucky press
        in the tournament game of two years ago?
    
        They just gave the ball to their 6'3" power forward and he
        dribbled it down the court.
    
        What a beautiful player he was!!!
    
                                                   Tony
77.487A Brunson BurneredCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsSun Feb 13 1994 21:091
    
77.488Big win yesterdayKALI::MORGANMon Feb 14 1994 12:195
    Donta Bright has to be the unsung hero of this team.  He's not a
    spectacular player, yet anyway, but he's constantly doing things to help
    his team win.       
    
    					Steve
77.489Good sport ChaneyOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Mon Feb 14 1994 12:303
    I heard that after the game Chaney interrupted Calipari's press
    conference and started screaming obscenities. Anyone  have the
    background on what what happeded/led up to the incident?
77.490Chaney's gamesmanship - reverse psychingAKOCOA::BREENMon Feb 14 1994 12:4910
    This was on espn and other news.  Chaney objected to Cal's criticism of
    refs and made a show of going after him at news converence.
    
    I concluded that this was chaney's attempt to set up the ref'ing for
    the final acc showdown game and get himself posited as the defender of
    "good" ref'ing.
    
    He may have been genuinely peeved at anyone winning a game at home and
    then criticizing officials - very poor form on cal's part but he then
    seized on that to try to create an image in refs mind.
77.491MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Mon Feb 14 1994 12:513
    When is the rematch?
    
    Mike
77.492CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Feb 14 1994 12:5117
    From what I understand, Chaney interrupted Calipari, and was
    supposedly upset at how Calipari was "intimidating" the referees
    (I guess Calipari had a conference with the refs post-game.
    Chaney screamed 'I'm gonna kick your ass." Chaney was also
    screaming about UMass' "rough tactics" and instructed his
    player to "smash the UMass player in the mouth". He continued
    to scream "Next time we meet, I'm gonna kick your ass." Chaney
    then rushed the stagew to get at Calipari but was prevented by
    security and both UMass and Temple players.
    
    Chaney actually came back in the room after his press conference
    to disrupt Calipari's.
    Not a pretty sight. Chaney was way out of control. He looked like
    a madman.
    
    MikeL
    
77.493GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Feb 14 1994 13:0757
         There has been bad blood between Chaney and Calipari for years.
    Temple won the FIRST 18 games between the two schools, a streak the
    predated Calipari's hiring.  While that streak was still ongoing, there
    was a triple OT game at the Cage (1990?), during which a verbal
    confrontation between the two during a timeout, ended with Chaney
    grabbing Calipari by the neck, and Calipari responding with an open
    fisted punch thrown in Chaney's direction.
    
         Last season, things escalated further over the recruitment of
    Rasheed Wallace (now at North Carolina).  UMASS was on Wallace's
    original long list, and UMASS assistant Bruiser Flint (a Philly native)
    became close with the young man.  Wallace eventually pared his list of
    school's down to UNC, Villanova, Temple and one other.  Evidently,
    Wallace consulted with Flint over his final choice, and by all accounts
    Flint wasn't too keen on Temple.  
    
         During the press conference in Philly after the first UMASS-Temple
    game last year (a 54-42 Temple victory), a shouting match developed 
    between a Temple Assistant Coach and Calipari, about this alleged
    interference by UMASS in the recruiting of Wallace.  What was
    interesting about this incident was that Calipari had just finished
    answering a question in which he was very complimentary about the
    Temple program, and how he had patterned the rebuilding of the UMASS
    program on the Temple model (playing the toughest schedule possible,
    getting on TV at all cost, ie. playing at midnight)
    
         Yesterday's confrontation was precipitated by a loud conversation
    Calipari had in the tunnel after the game with the officials, in which
    he complained about some of the calls.  Supposedly Chaney met with 
    reporters first, and was cool, calm and collected.  When Calipari got
    his chance, either Chaney had hung around, or else reentered the
    interview room.  When a reporter asked about the officiating, Calipari
    was in the midst of giving an answer, when Chaney started yelling from
    the back of the room.  The conversation escalated, and before you know
    it, Chaney was threatening to "kill Calipari", "kick his ass", and
    do other unpleasant things.  He eventually charged the podium, and had
    to be restrained by a combination of UMASS' Mike Williams, Temple's
    Eddie Jones and a Temple Assistant.  In the process he had Williams
    in a stranglehold.  A very unsportsman like scene, and one deserving of
    an investigation by A10 officials!
    
         All of which gives a black-eye to a very exciting basketball game,
    which was won by UMASS 56-55, on a last second shot be none other 
    than Mike Williams.  Now Williams won't make any All-American teams,
    and probably won't be drafted by the NBA, but there is no one, not
    Jason Kidd, not Donald Williams, not Glenn Robinson, not Donyell
    Marshall, that I would give the ball to in crunch time with the game
    on the line, over Michael Williams.  He has now taken game winning
    shots with under 10 seconds to go in five games over the last two years
    and make all of them, and has salted away numerous others, just ask
    Dean Smith and ACChris.  The guy has ice water running in his veins.
    
         UMASS goes to 10 and 0 in the A10, and Temple registers its 3rd
    loss in the A10, just about sewing up home court advantage in the
    A10 Tourney.  An important win!
    
    Russ 
77.494METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Mon Feb 14 1994 13:325
ESPN said that the UMass-Temple rematch was next Thursday. Channel
7 said they would only meet again in the A10 tourney. I tend to
believe ESPN.

The Crazy Met
77.495Ah believesCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Feb 14 1994 13:465
    Channel 7's gotsta be wrong. Conf.  opponents play home and home and
    UMass has yet to play at Temple.
    
    MikeL
    
77.496Like a pre-fight boxing press conference, or something...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 14 1994 13:5013
    
    Apparently John Chaney is just trying to build up his credibility for his
    on-going battles with the NCAA college presidents.  Clearly, more young
    men need to be turned over to the likes of this lunatic...
    
    How many times has Chaney been involved in physical altercations over
    the past few years, not just with Calipari (with his own brash style, no
    saint himself, perhaps)?  College coaches who repeatedly take to
    fighting with their opponents should be fired, period.  When you think
    about what they're fighting about it's almost humorous, in the absurd... 
     
    glenn
    
77.497Talk about a poor loserTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop...on the RunMon Feb 14 1994 14:107
    Thursday, February 24 at McGonigle Hall.  On ESPN.
    
    Chaney totally lost it.  He was an embarrassment to himself, and his
    school.  The school president should suspend him for the rest of the
    year before the A-10 or the NCAA do it for him.
    
    NAZZ
77.498GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Feb 14 1994 14:1219
         According to a recent article on John Chaney, he has had
    physical confrontations with two other A10 Coaches over the years.
    It is interesting that Temple athletes are known for their discipline,
    and the fact that they don't trash talk or cheap shot their opponents,
    virtues that are instilled by the teaching of John Chaney.  Chaney
    himself in the article admitted that he would dismiss from his team
    any of his players who resorted to physical retaliation or cheap
    shots.
    
         Calipari, in my view, is notorious for working the officials, a
    tactic which has backfired on him upon occasion.  He has also achieved
    a great deal of success in a short period of time, somewhat at the
    expense of Temple.  Given his cocky demeanor, and UMASS' two
    consecutive A10 regular season and tournament titles, I'm not 
    surprised that he has gotten under Chaney's skin.  From the replays I
    saw of the incident with Chaney, he took the high road, choosing not
    to comment on Chaney's erruption.
    
    Russ
77.499I expect Temple to be every bit as tough as MichinganAKOCOA::BREENMon Feb 14 1994 14:175
    I think the big problem is the stringent standards they expect students
    to uphold and then these bobby knight imitators pull these stunts.
    
    I mean some thirsty kid takes a few extra buds outta the packy and the
    school suspends em for a game, or was it two?  
77.500Great stuff ....RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 14 1994 14:1914
    John Chaney thrives on intimidation.  His ego is boundless, so the fack
    that Calipari can match him ego-for-ego undoubtedly goes right up his
    u_know_what.
    
    BTW, UMass' tactic to stear Wallace out of the A10 once they knew they
    wouldn't get him is not only smart but a fairly common practice.  Dean
    used his friendship with John Thompson to try and get players to go to
    Georgetown instead of Maryland when Lefty was still with the Terps, once 
    he knew he wasn't gettin' 'em.
    
    Good "skinny" on Wallace, BTW.  Tanks .....
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.501MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Feb 14 1994 14:3617
    And now back to the game...

    I have to agree with Russ about Williams, come crunch time he's
    as good or better than anyone in the country. A rather foolish 
    move by Chaney to go man, I think, because no one can handle 
    Mike Williams one-on-one. The kid can score from any where on
    the floor. When they spread the D, it was over. His backcourt 
    mate, Derrick Kellogg, had a good game, too. Nice to see Kellogg 
    finally start hoisting up that three. It's within his range, it's 
    there, take it!. There's such a thing as being too unselfish and I 
    think that's the case with Kellogg alot. I'd like to see him shoot 
    alot more and give the team another dimension but this is a start. 
    I still wish he could score going to the hoop but you can't have
    everything. They could have dumped it in and kicked it out for the 
    trey all day long. 
    
77.502HANNAH::ASHEDon't ask me, I'm just the adviserMon Feb 14 1994 14:5112
    You can intimidate, and you can be upset of one coach is getting his
    way (in his opinion) with the ref's.  Sounds like Chaney was also upset
    because Calipari met with the refs after the game and Chaney wasn't
    invited.  By the rules, but coaches should be there.
    
    BUT, there's on excuse for going after another coach and screaming "I'm
    gonna kill you."  Not sure why he was wound that tight, it was a big
    loss.  But you can't do that, I'm sorry.  Someone has to step in on
    this one.  If he's on the bench when UMass comes to town, something
    stinks big time.  I hope there's enough security on campus and the refs
    take control EARLY for this game.
    
77.503DOCTP::TESSIERMon Feb 14 1994 15:423
Who let Kevin Johnson coach Temple for a day?

Ken
77.504FRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Mon Feb 14 1994 15:482
    KJ was busy at the All-Star game.  You know, the one all the Lakers
    were watching on TV.
77.505Once again, hindsight proves Dean correct & me wrong.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 14 1994 15:5110
    > A rather foolish move by Chaney to go man, I think, because no one 
    > can handle Mike Williams one-on-one. 
    
    Hmmmm.  Maybe I was too quick to criticize Dean for going zone with us
    leading by 3 with ~ :30 seconds to go & UMass with the ball.
    
    Thanks,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.506USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 14 1994 16:3616
>         According to a recent article on John Chaney, he has had
>    physical confrontations with two other A10 Coaches over the years.
>    It is interesting that Temple athletes are known for their discipline,
>    and the fact that they don't trash talk or cheap shot their opponents,
>    virtues that are instilled by the teaching of John Chaney.
				^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Maybe that's why Chaney lost it so badly.  He said Calipari had his kids
cheap-shotting the Temple kids the whole game.  Maybe he sees Calipari
as teaching the opposite values that he teaches, and it contributed to
his team losing a big game.


BTW, is the A-10 tournament a real home-court tournament (ie: if UMass
ends with the best regular-season record, they play on their home floor
throughout) ?
77.507GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Feb 14 1994 17:1016
         In the A10 Tourney, the quarterfinals and semi's are played 
    in Philadelphia at the Palestra (although not Temple's or St.Joe's
    home court, still a bit of an advantage, wouldn't you think?)
    The Championship Game is played on the homecourt of the highest
    seeded remaining team.
    
         I attended yesterday's game, and didn't see any of the cheap
    shots that Chaney was so incensed about.  I did think that Temple's big
    three (Jones, McKie and Brunson) were jumping into UMASS defenders
    all day on their jump shots, to draw fouls, and that never once 
    were they called for creating the contact.  On the flip side, while
    Temple had a big edge in foul shots during the first half, it was
    at least partially deserved because UMASS was unable to work the ball
    inside to Roe and Camby with any regularity.
    
    Russ       
77.508HANNAH::ASHEIt's a nice day for - cardigan's...Mon Feb 14 1994 19:018
    >     In the A10 Tourney, the quarterfinals and semi's are played 
    >in Philadelphia at the Palestra (although not Temple's or St.Joe's
    >home court, still a bit of an advantage, wouldn't you think?)
    
    That happens with a lot of tournaments though.  Big East is at MSG
    (St. Johns advantage?)  I know the MAAC is in Albany (Siena plays
    3-4 games there a year).  I'm sure there are others...
    
77.509METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Feb 14 1994 19:116
> Big East is at MSG (St. Johns advantage?)

Not really.The teams in the BE are all close enough to NY that going there for
a weekend of basketball is not that tough. SH is real close as well.

The Crazy Met
77.510HANNAH::ASHEIt's a nice day for - cardigan's...Mon Feb 14 1994 19:151
    Miami?  Syracuse isn't that close vs. UMASS and the Palestra...
77.511METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Feb 14 1994 19:226
SH, Villanova, SJU, G'town, BC, UConn Providence are all close. And heck Miami
is a 2+ hour plane ride; folks do that for a long weekend. Syracuse, well I
suppose if you could fly it would be a quick trip. Not sure if Syracuse
has an airport :-)

The Crazy Met
77.512CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Feb 14 1994 19:276
    What's the poop with UMass-Amherst hockey?
    Is Joe Mallen tryin' to pull together a contendah for HockeyEast
    in a few years?
    
    MikeL
    
77.513just a slap on the hand...SALEM::STIGDogmanMon Feb 14 1994 23:3611
    Cheney only got suspended for one game for that tantrum he pulled. From
    what I see he and Bobby Knight should go into the loonietoon bin
    together. These are kids that you are modeling yourself after. Its sad
    to see this type of stuff..I wouldn't blame the coaches totally because
    college basketball is big business also...a lot of stress is involved
    to be a coach but if you can't act proffessional about it you shouldn't
    be there to begin with....
    
                          stig
    
    
77.514Cheaney probably threatened to sue the NCAA ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Feb 15 1994 12:085
    Suspended for a single game when it's documented on film that he
    threatened to *KILL* somebody?!  Weak.  Very weak.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.515I don't think it's over...HANNAH::ASHEWe're riding on the freeway of love...Tue Feb 15 1994 12:181
    One game by the school.  The league may take further action.
77.516MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Tue Feb 15 1994 12:2511
    Some possible background from WFAN yesterday:
    
    Cheney supposedly was told that Calipari was blasting the
    refs during the press conference.  Cheney got in some trouble
    after the West Virginia game for getting on the refs.  That could
    be why he blew up.
    
    The worst thing Cheney did was to threaten the UMass players.
    The first hard foul in the rematch could set off a brawl.
    
    Mike
77.517CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 15 1994 12:3016
>    The worst thing Cheney did was to threaten the UMass players.
>    The first hard foul in the rematch could set off a brawl.
    
I would think him saying very clearly "I'll kill you" to Calipari, 
on tape, would be the worst thing he did....8^)


The A10 has to take some action on this, without a doubt.  I'm not upset
with Temple suspending him for a game, but it's not really up to them, IMO,
to suspend him for more than that.  I do feel it's up to the league.

I'd bet he gets 5 games.  Ten games would be excessive, but it's got to
be at least 5.......


'Saw
77.51838346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 15 1994 12:384
77.519MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Feb 15 1994 12:5417
    
    
      John Chaney ought to very seriously think about taking some time
     away from the game of basketball before it kills him. He looks like
     he gets about fifteen minutes of sleep a night and subsists on Maalox
     milk shakes. No doubt he's a very good coach and definitely cares
     about his players, but when you're wound up tight enough to actually
     threaten to kill someone, it's time to take a step back for some
     serious self-examination. A suspension is definitely in order, but
     it probably isn't going to cure what really ails Chaney. The peri-
     pheral issue here is the pressure of big-time college athletics.
     When on the one hand you talk about "scholar-athletes" and on the
     other hand you have Dean Smith and Rick Pitino making millions of
     dollars, it doesn't take a Fullbright scholar to see that somehow
     our priorities got seriously out of whack. It's win or walk and
     for some coaches that coupled with their own self-induced pressure
     is too much.
77.520CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 15 1994 13:0032
>      John Chaney ought to very seriously think about taking some time
>     away from the game of basketball before it kills him. He looks like
>     he gets about fifteen minutes of sleep a night and subsists on Maalox
>     milk shakes. No doubt he's a very good coach and definitely cares
>     about his players, but when you're wound up tight enough to actually
>     threaten to kill someone, it's time to take a step back for some
>     serious self-examination. 


Arnold Dean said the same thing on the WTIC-1080 sports talk show last
evening around 6:30.

There was lots of talk on WFAN about this, but no one over there mentioned
that he should take a vacation (so to speak).



>     When on the one hand you talk about "scholar-athletes" and on the
>     other hand you have Dean Smith and Rick Pitino making millions of
>     dollars, it doesn't take a Fullbright scholar to see that somehow
>     our priorities got seriously out of whack. It's win or walk and
>     for some coaches that coupled with their own self-induced pressure
>     is too much.


That's a good point, Tommy.  So many programs are just the farm system
for the NBA, it seems......


'Saw


77.521Typical of America: Let's find an excuse for Chaney.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Feb 15 1994 13:5314
    Spare me the association between Chaney's wacko-blowup and
    colleges being the bush leagues for the NBA.  The later is
    a by-product of the big-time programs that are doing it right,
    not their reason for existence.  Carolina graduates ~ 98% of
    their men's basketball players, which doesn't quite sound like
    a school hiring some guns for the sole purpose of generating W's
    and apprenticing for the NBA.
    
    I suspect there's a whole lot more going on with this Chaney vs.
    Calipari thing than just ref-baiting.  The Rasheed Wallace story
    perhaps gives us a glimpse into what's *really* under John's skin.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.522USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Feb 15 1994 14:022
I don't think I've ever seen a coach get a 5-game suspension.  I doubt
we'll see it here.
77.523What I heardCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Feb 15 1994 14:0217
    
    Remember when the A10 was Temple, Temple, and Temple. Not anymore.
    A few years back I believe the A10(Temple and Chaney) were looking
    for some prime TV time. Me sources tell me that Chaney approached
    some of the other coaches (Cal at UMass) looking to politicize and
    bargain the networks for some prime time TV. Calipari said he
    had no time for this BS and quickly jumped on ESPN's midnight
    madness foer quick exposure. Remember that ESPN televised
    UMass in Alaska and continued its midnight madness. All this
    has equated for some nice exposure for UMass the last coupla
    years (hasn't UMass been on national TV several=8 times this year?)
    Hadn't hardly seen Temple on da tube.. Maybe Chaney's po'd at
    Calipari for goin' out on his own, TV-wise.
    Only a thought...
    
    MikeL
    
77.52438346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 15 1994 15:194
77.52538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 15 1994 15:3110
77.526Let's give hoops scholarships to smart short white kids ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Feb 15 1994 15:415
    I wonder if the French Department considers how well the person is at
    French when they give out scholarships ....
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.527CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 15 1994 15:454
>    I wonder if the French Department considers how well the person is at
>    French when they give out scholarships ....
    
I think they take into account whether it's kissing or speaking.....
77.528MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Feb 15 1994 15:475
 > I wonder if the French Department considers how well the person is at
 > French when they give out scholarships ....
  
     They give degrees in basketball at UNC? No wonder that they graduate
     98%.
77.529CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Feb 15 1994 15:5611
    
    
    	Yabbut I think Chaney is a bit too serious.  Maybe he should take a
    1 year sabattical.
    
    	Failing that, Temple should hire Bill Cosby as a_assistant coach,
    just to balance Chaney.
    
    	good idea?
    
    
77.530CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 15 1994 16:2611
>    	Failing that, Temple should hire Bill Cosby as a_assistant coach,
>    just to balance Chaney.
>    
>    	good idea?
>    


Actually, late on the FAN last night the idea was brought up that perhaps
Cosby could mediate before the re-match, as he's a Temple grad and holds
an honorary degree from UMASS......    

77.531GIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Feb 15 1994 16:3017
    Re:  77.512
    
         And now for something completely different ......
    
         The UMASS Hockey Team currently sports a 15 and 7 record in this,
    their first year of competition since being disbanded as a varsity
    sport during the late '70's.  Joe Mallen fields (or is it ices) a team
    made up of all freshmen except for one senior defensemen, who also
    started on the football team.  They have played 6 or so Division One
    opponents, and I believe their only victory at that level was against
    Army.  Mallen comes highly regarded as a collegiate hockey coach and
    provided he can successfully recruit in Eastern Massachusetts against
    the BU's, Harvard's and BC's, he should become competitive in Hockey
    East in a relatively short period of time.
    
    Russ
                                     
77.532mebbe just a minor correction......CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Feb 15 1994 16:5012
    
    
    >> "...holds an honorary degree from UMASS."
    
    	Yabbut just a nit, Dr. William Cosby earned a bona fida PhD. in
    Childhood Education from UMASS.  T'aint honorary - them's reserved
    for politicians  ;^)
    
    I remain,
    the Nit_Cadet!
    Kev
    
77.533CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 15 1994 17:256
Well, bust my buttons.

I didn't know that, but then, as I said, I was repeating what I heard on
WFAN.....

At any rate, he'd probably be a good choice.....
77.534HANNAH::ASHEWe're riding on the freeway of love...Tue Feb 15 1994 17:557
77.535See Big-Ten's Handling of Bob KnightDYPSS1::ROPERTake a Sad Song and Make it BetterTue Feb 15 1994 18:434
    I doubt seriously the A-10 will take any disciplinary action against
    Cheney.  It's sad, but my money's on them washing their hands of it.
    
    - Rope
77.536HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Feb 15 1994 19:096
  Was this the 1st time it happened?

  If so, then the 1 game suspension by the President of Temple should be
enough.

  George
77.537curious??SALEM::STIGDogmanWed Feb 16 1994 01:274
    Couldn't there be criminal action takin from cheney threatening to kill
    someone?? 
    
                   stig
77.538First A-10 lossKALI::MORGANWed Feb 16 1994 09:339
    UMASS lost 81-80 to St. Joe's last night.  They shot something like 37%
    from the field.  
    
    The school is also asking that next Thursday's game with Temple be
    played off Temple's campus, and that limited numbers of fans for each
    team be allowed admission.  I don't see how they can limit the number
    of fans, but it may be a good idea to play it at the Spectrum.
    
    					Steve
77.539GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Feb 16 1994 11:3734
         Even though Calipari gave credit to St.Joe's for playing a
    very good game last night, he can't be happy with his team as he
    gets ready for the stretch run into the league tourney and the NCAA's.
    As an earlier noter so aptly put it, this team plays to the level of
    the competition.  There is no way this team will make an NCAA run
    given their current level of play.
    
         One of the hallmarks of earlier Calipari teams was their ability
    to "jell" in February and to put together impressive late season
    winning streaks.  This team has performed just the opposite .... even
    though they are young and relatively inexperienced, they came out of
    the blocks fast, and were playing their best basketball in January.
    Since the one point win over George Washington, every game has been a
    struggle, regardless of the opponent.
    
         Another bit of interesting news has come out about the John Chaney
    outburst.  The post game "meeting" that Calipari had with the refs
    that Chaney was so concerned about, consisted of a single comment or
    statement by Calipari as one of the refs passed him in the
    hallway.  The ref responded to the comment, and kept walking, so
    it couldn't have been all that offensive.  This, according to A10
    Commissioner Ron Bertovich, who was with Calipari when the referee
    walked by.
    
         The more I think about the incident, I believe that John Chaney's
    sole intent was to "prepare" his team for the rematch(s) to come with 
    UMASS, and in the process he became overly excited, and went a bit too 
    far.
    
    Russ
    
    - I loved the scowling John Chaney photo's that the St.Joe's students
      were waving when UMASS players shot free throws last night!     
                                                                 
77.540Chaney/UMassSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Feb 16 1994 12:0548
      Chaney:
    
        I really think deep down he's a good guy, but sure he's not
        perfect.  He's probably irked by most all the things mentioned
        here; from the success of the young 'whippersnapper' Calipari
        to the Rasheed Wallace situation to UMass' TV coverage to Temple
        just losing a big game by a single point to him perhaps misunder-
        standing Calipari's conversation with the ref.
    
        My feeling is that all of Chaney's words were just that...words.
        EXCEPT, the part about having the UMass player be hit.  THAT's 
        the part that is real inexcusable.  The killing part is a crock;
        he'd never do that.
    
        There's a friend in my facility from Philly who told me a couple
        years ago that Chaney's "a certified lunatic!"  He says I'm too
        nice in my perception of him.  I really feel that he wants to 
        prepare young men who may have had some disadvantages in life for
        the rest of their lives and he instills really good qualities.
    
        But, he sure looks wound up tight as Tommy says.  I feel that 
        Chaney is a Temple icon.  With his eyes sticking out and the
        big black rings around his eyes, and the look as someone said that
        he lacks sleep (surely he is nocturnal)...he is THE TEMPLE OWL.  
        HE LOOKS JUST LIKE AN OWL!!!!!  ;-)
    
        The quintessential coach of the mighty Temple Owls.  He can never
        be replaced!
    
     UMass:
    
        How does a teal lose to Saint Joes?  Correct me if I am wrong, but 
        don't they finish at GWU and at Temple?  These are the two teams
        they beat by a single point AT Umass.  They better get by GWU!
    
        I hate to say it, but they look a year away from making serious
        inroads in the tournament.  When they've played the money games, 
        they basically lost all the away ones and barely won the home
        ones, i.e. Florida State, GWU, Temple.  Losses at Cinci, at DePaul,
        Kentucky.
    
        I just have the premonition that if they play a Virginia in the
        2nd round, you can flip a coin on the outcome and flipping a coin
        on a second round game can't be considered to be a real strong
        contender.  I hope I'm proven wrong, but the games against merely
        good teams have been too close.
    
                                                        Tony
77.541as expectedCNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopWed Feb 16 1994 12:325
The A-10 says that Temple's suspension of Chaney for one game is good enough
for them and will not punish him any further according to my paper....

mike
77.542GIAMEM::SCHOTTWed Feb 16 1994 12:406
         The A10 and the NCAA have the balls of the USOC.  The fact that
    the A10 Commissioner witnessed the game and the hallway scene, and
    has downplayed Calipari's actions, makes their inaction all the more
    questionable.
    
    Russ
77.543It's about basketball, not life (A10's inaction confirms that)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 16 1994 12:5026
>        There's a friend in my facility from Philly who told me a couple
>        years ago that Chaney's "a certified lunatic!"  He says I'm too
>        nice in my perception of him.  I really feel that he wants to 
>        prepare young men who may have had some disadvantages in life for
>        the rest of their lives and he instills really good qualities.
    
    That may be your and others' impression but the way I hear it Temple
    basketball's student graduation rates have been pretty poor over the
    years.  This was coincident with scandals which decimated the football 
    program several years ago, most notably around star RB Paul Palmer. 
    Palmer was being compensated nicely in his time at Temple and eventually 
    was ruled ineligible, and later after his short pro career with the Chiefs 
    ended it was further revealed that he was unable to read.
    
    I've never had this favorable impression of academic standards in the
    athletic department at Temple, including the basketball program under
    Chaney.  The words and the intent may be commendable but if most kids
    aren't leaving with that diploma at absolute minimum then this
    "instilling qualities" stuff is still just talk, and hypocritical talk 
    at that.  If it has to be, so be it, but let's just be up front about
    it and say that 4 years of semi-pro basketball in a semi-eductional 
    setting is better than nothing at all, because that's generally what's 
    been going on at Temple... 
    
    glenn
77.544Globe (more) on Cheney outburstAKOCOA::BREENWed Feb 16 1994 12:5110
    Umass is considering appealing
    
    Local DA Office did investigate but amid much verviage seem willing to
    let colleges handle it but did condemn the action
    
    I agree with Russ; Cheney had "a plan" but lost it.  He must have a
    very deep seated hatred of calipari.
    
    Since everyone else has refrained from making some very obvious
    comments I will too
77.545No Guts - No GloryDYPSS1::ROPERTake a Sad Song and Make it BetterWed Feb 16 1994 12:527
    It's a federal offense to threaten to kill the President even if you
    didn't really mean to say it.  You'd think that a threat against even a
    lowly college basketball coach would warrant more than a 1 game
    suspension!  A-10 leaders must have conferred with the Big-10 before
    issuing any statement.
    
    - Rope
77.546HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Feb 16 1994 12:5915
RE                   <<< Note 77.537 by SALEM::STIG "Dogman" >>>

>    Couldn't there be criminal action takin from cheney threatening to kill
>    someone?? 
    
  In a trail that lasted 7 months, two separate juries failed to convict Lyle
and Erick Menendez for gunning down their parents with shotguns in cold blood.
They couldn't even convict them of manslaughter. Any prosecutor that tried to
convict a basketball coach for mouthing off would get laughed out of court. 

  Considering the typical behavior of college basketball coaches, one coach
complaining about officials and yelling at another would never be taken
seriously by the courts. 

  George 
77.547MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Feb 16 1994 13:0915
     Does anyone have any numbers on Temple's graduation rates or
   just a bunch of "from what I hears"? The Palmer situation while
   sad has absolutely nothing to do with John Chaney. And while
   Chaney may envy Calipari his success don't forget that it was
   Chaney who drafted the blueprint that all the other A-10 coaches
   are following to quickly build A-1 programs. It was Chaney who went
   out and scheduled the toughest competition he could find instead of
   padding his record and schedule with creampuffs. And it was Chaney
   who managed to get quality players to see the A-10 as a viable option.
   When Calipari came to UMass he followed that example. Chaney may be 
   jealous of Calipari (but probably not) but Calipari owes Chaney a debt 
   of gratitude. John Chaney as much as anybody was instrumental in making
   the A-10 one of the best conferences in the country. So can the hearsay.
    
77.548Not just about Chaney, but the mythical "shaper of men" crockNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 16 1994 13:5230
    
>   Does anyone have any numbers on Temple's graduation rates or
>   just a bunch of "from what I hears"?
    
    The latest reference to my comments comes from WFAN's Mike Francesa, who
    specifically cited the low graduation rates of the Temple basketball
    program (I say Temple basketball because I don't hold John Chaney
    solely or even primarily responisble for that).  While I don't
    have the hard numbers at the moment, I consider that to be a reliable 
    source.  The last overall numbers I *do* have are from a 1991 study 
    that Temple declined to respond to.
    
    The Palmer situation indeed has nothing to do with John Chaney, but it
    does have to do with Temple.  I bring it up because it speaks
    to the credibility of the Temple athletic department and its higher-ups,
    and statements such as that released the other day speaking to the 
    high character of John Chaney and the basketball program.  I take it 
    all with a huge grain of salt, and I don't think that's unreasonable.
    
    None of this says that athletics at Temple or John Chaney's performance
    is markedly different from that anywhere else, by anyone else.  I've
    always been consistently jaded about the importance assigned to college
    sports towards life (beyond the entertainment value).  I'm merely 
    disagreeing with that flowery language around Chaney's merits expressed 
    in a previous note, because I really don't believe that there's been 
    anything particularly special or exemplary about Chaney or Temple sports 
    over the years.
    
    glenn
    
77.549GRANPA::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Wed Feb 16 1994 14:0518
    The Paul Palmer payments have absolutely nothing to do with Temple,
    either. Palmer took money from agents Norby Walters and Lloyd Bloom
    prior to his senior season. When the Temple athletic department found
    out he had taken the payments, the forfeited every game from that
    season and had any stats that Palmer compiled that season removed from
    their records. Palmer was one of about 50 players (from schools such as
    Ohio State, Michigan, Alabama, Notre Dame) that were part of the
    scandal. Chris Mortenson (sp) from TSN and ESPN wrote a book about the
    whole matter.
    
    Regarding Chaney's graduation rate, he also takes chances on alot of
    kids and does make a committment to them getting an education. He's had
    some that flunk out and several leave early for the NBA. If you want to
    take shots at Chaney for his actions Sunday, that's one thing, but to
    take shots at him as an educator is way off base. 
    
    Dennis Faust
    
77.550Not an easy road ahead for UMassTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeWed Feb 16 1994 14:1232
    The University of Massachusetts has graduated 15 of the 18 student
    athletes that have been on the basketball team since John Calipari
    joined the school six years ago.  Two of the three who did not graduate
    are on track to receive degrees this spring.
    
    As for their remaining Atlantic 10 schedule, it's not an easy one.
    UMass has not played well (except for the URI game at home) for the
    past month.  Since their destruction of West Virginia in Morgantown on
    January 13, the Minutemen have struggled in almost every game.  I
    suppose it's to be expected when you play 3 freshman, 3 sophomores, 
    4 juniors and no seniors in your ten player rotation.  However, they
    need to step up their level of play, for their final stretch of games
    is not easy.  Here's what they have left after the Midnight Madness
    game with Manhattan on Friday:
    
    	Sunday 2/20	West Virginia
    	Tuesday 2/22	St. Joseph's
    	Thursday 2/24	AT Temple
    	Sunday 2/27	AT George Washington
    	Wednesday 3/2	Duquesne
    
    The West Virginia game is critical.  The Mountaineers will be out for
    revenge after the way UMass humiliated them at home last month.  A win
    vs UMass would certainly guarantee their entry into the NCAA
    tournament.  The Temple game may be impossible to win.  The GW game
    will be almost as tough.  GW coach Mike Jarvis is no fan of Calipari,
    and would love to knock him out of first place, especially after the
    heartbreaking one point loss he suffered in Amherst.  Duquesne and GW
    are both in the hunt for post-season berths and a defest of UMass would
    look very impressive to the selection committee.
    
    NAZZ
77.55138346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 16 1994 14:155
77.55238346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 16 1994 14:187
77.553I just don't buy into that rhetoric; that's my opinion...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 16 1994 14:3729
>    Regarding Chaney's graduation rate, he also takes chances on alot of
>    kids and does make a committment to them getting an education. He's had
>    some that flunk out and several leave early for the NBA. If you want to
>    take shots at Chaney for his actions Sunday, that's one thing, but to
>    take shots at him as an educator is way off base. 
    
    That's a matter of opinion, Dennis, that lies at the question of what
    the role of college athletics is.  I happen to believe that for the
    most part they are a money-making professional endeavor, including at 
    Temple, that have little to do with education.  Taking chances and
    consistently failing at a higher-than-average rate only serves to 
    deprive more deserving candidates of actually attaining a useful 
    degree, if we're indeed talking about education as the primary goal 
    (and not the business, which I'm also perfectly willing to accept in the 
    absence of the hypocrisy, with some standards in place).  And I 
    don't consider saying so to be "taking shots" at John Chaney; just 
    the truth. 
    
    FWIW, I know that Palmer was nailed for payments from Walters, and I 
    also believe that Temple's coaches had knowledge of what was going on 
    which is the reason they decided to forfeit all those games.  Your 
    account makes Temple sound almost completely blameless, which is not 
    what I remember.  I remember a scandal.  The kid went through, what, 
    3 or 4 years of college without being able to read?  Was this "taking 
    a chance"?
    
    glenn
    
77.554MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Feb 16 1994 15:2825
  >> The University of Massachusetts has graduated 15 of the 18 student
  >> athletes that have been on the basketball team since John Calipari
  >> joined the school six years ago.  Two of the three who did not graduate
  >> are on track to receive degrees this spring.
    
     Nice to see some hard numbers and attendant explanation instead of
     'Joe Pickynose on WACK says it's low'. Whatever 'low' is. Is it 60%?
     2%? Is it low relative to Duke or relative to UNLV? And this stuff 
     about "deserving candidates" ignores what coaches like Chaney and 
     Thompson feel to be a large part of their mission which is to give 
     inner city, primarily black kids a shot at a first rate education. 
     If that means taking chances on kids that might not be willing or
     able to do what it takes to graduate then I can't fault him for
     that. Because 'deserving candidates' almost certainly does not include
     Prop 48 kids. Until now, I've never heard a single negative thing 
     about John Chaney. I knew he was volatile but I also knew/know him 
     as someone who is a well respected leader in the BCA. The man has
     had a great career as a coach and we never heard anything about him.
     Now, he goes overboard (yes, *way* overboard) and we have people
     impugning his program, his commitment to his kids and damn near
     everything he stands for. Tell Francesa to spit out some actual data 
     or shut up.

    
77.555DZIGN::ROBICHAUDTonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkankWed Feb 16 1994 15:389
	Man I got to get back in here or ::SPROTS will sink into a terminal 
AlanAlda state.  I think you guys are making a big thing out of nothing 
with this Chaney incident.  I've seen much worse in my neighborhood after 
the Tankard and Elbow Lounge had last call.  Now he should't have done it, 
but a one game suspension is fair and just.  Personally I wouldn't be 
surprised if ESPN wrote the script for Chaney and Calipari to promote next 
Thursday's game on their station (just like 'rasslin).

				/Don
77.556Too Easy To Fall In The Early RoundsSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Feb 16 1994 16:2215
      re: .552
    
        The reason I think it'll be tough for them to go far because
        they play to the level of their competition is that this makes
        for a higher probability that the earlier games in the tourna-
        ment would be closer to 'coin flips' as far as who will win 
        instead of almost guaranteed victories.  A lot of teams, you 
        are real confident they'll make it through the first two rounds
        fairly handily and then maybe there will be close ones the rest
        of the way.
    
        With a team that plays to the level of competition, they have a
        much better chance of falling early.
    
                                                     Tony
77.55738346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 16 1994 16:2311
77.558MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Feb 16 1994 16:297
    
 >> Gee, I guess I missed the part on all those college entrance exams that
 >> asked for verticle leap, shooting percentage, and assists/game.

    I'm sure that you have a point, Mac. I mean they say there's a first
    time for everything. But still, I haven't a clue of what you mean.
    
77.55938346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 16 1994 16:322
    How's this, Tommy:  Why should adeptness at basketball skills guarantee
    someone a free education?
77.560FRETZ::HEISERblack the skyWed Feb 16 1994 16:351
    or whatever happened to academic scholarships?
77.56138346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 16 1994 16:401
    As far as I know, Mike, academic scholarships are still available.
77.562FRETZ::HEISERblack the skyWed Feb 16 1994 16:432
    I realize that Mac.  for once I'd like to hear of an athlete going to
    college on an academic scholarship.  
77.563If there's effort, an absence of abuse, I have no problem...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 16 1994 16:4631
>     If that means taking chances on kids that might not be willing or
>     able to do what it takes to graduate then I can't fault him for
>     that.
    
    Why wouldn't you fault a coach for taking on a kid not *willing* (as
    opposed to not able, the other part) to do what it takes to 
    graduate?  Isn't this sort of an absolute minimum assumption with a 
    student, that he'll at least try in the classroom?  I suppose you 
    mean me as one of those persons impugning Chaney's program, but if 
    this is part of the philosophy (and I'm not sure that it is), I call 
    it honest disagreement.  I would rather see the kid who is the lesser 
    ballplayer but who will give it the effort in the classroom get the 
    scholarship.  Maybe this is idealistic, but I do believe there is no 
    shortage of such disadvantaged kids willing to do so...
    
    FWIW, again without precise attribution but which I believe to be
    factual, I understand that Georgetown's basketball program has a very
    good graduation rate.  John Thompson and the Georgetown faculty put 
    major effort into this.  I have no problem with programs dependent on
    Prop-48 kids (I do think that Prop-48 or some better standard is needed
    to contain abuse and should be retained) if the honest effort is put in, 
    in both directions.  Perhaps my impressions of Temple are bogus.  Even 
    if they're not, this is still no larger condemnation of the BCA and its 
    viewpoint, because while I still believe college athletics to be generally
    exploitative and hypocritical with regard to education, that's certainly
    not because of the BCA (not when college sports are run by 90%+ white
    coaches and administrators). 
    
    glenn
    
77.564CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 16 1994 16:4628
>    How's this, Tommy:  Why should adeptness at basketball skills guarantee
>    someone a free education?
 
It's pretty simple.  Universities exist for two reasons.  One is to educate
people.  The other is to make money (for a variety of reasons).

One of the biggest ways that a university makes money is through it's
athletic programs.

Now, say you want your athletic program to make good money.  To do that you
usually have to win games.  To win games, you need good athletes.  So
you have to get them to come to your school.

Kind of like a business will give out free samples to get you to try
something, a University will give out scholarships -- ie, you play hoops
for us, you go to school for free, quid pro quo.


Now,  I supposed the idealistic view of it would be that the youth (or
yewt if your from Brooklyn) gets an education by parlaying his Gawd-Given
talent in hoops.  But realistically, the University is buying his services,
but instead of money, they give out classes.


Not necessarily nobel (or even inert) but it's the way it is.....


'Saw
77.565His wife made him do itAKOCOA::BREENWed Feb 16 1994 16:4910
    Cheney publickly apologized today in a prepared statement (from the
    ms/work-bench for college coaches - apology function box - icon 32)
    
    One point made by a fellow worker, non-avid fan.  Calipari knows just
    how to aggravate, I've known a few like that.
    
    re. scholarships for athletes.  The scholastic level of athletes will
    be maximum achievable while still filling those 80,000 seat stadiums
    and getting those tv $bucks.  Those schools that can afford it (like
    Yale) can improve their standards.  The Temples at their peril.
77.56638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 16 1994 16:504
    I know that's the way it is, 'Saw.  But like glenn said, do they have
    to be so hypocritical about it?  Just admit you're the NBA's farm
    system and try to at least make sure the kid can read, write, and has a
    marketable skill by the time he leaves.
77.567CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 16 1994 16:5612
>    system and try to at least make sure the kid can read, write, and has a
>    marketable skill by the time he leaves.


The marketable skill they try to give him is basketball, and from the prices
it seems the market will bear these days, it's a high paying skill.....


Course, when you hit your mid-30s, you ain't so marketable any more....


'Saw
77.56838346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 16 1994 16:596
77.569Chaney apparantly knows he did wrongTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeWed Feb 16 1994 17:1722
    Just got through listening to Mike and the Mad Dog on WFAN talk about
    the Chaney apology.  Apparently, he said that his wife has moved out of
    the house after the incident and his daughter refuses to speak to him.
    Francesa read his statement on the air - took about a minute.  Then
    they had a radio guy from Philly on who was at the press conference and
    he said it took Chaney over five minutes to read the same statement. 
    He was really emotional about it.  He said he realized he went over the
    edge, and was truly sorry.  He apologized to Calipari, the fans of both
    schools, and everyone else he could think of.
    
    Despite the apology Mike and Chris both felt the suspension was way too
    light, and they blasted A-10 commissioner Ron Bertovich.  Among the
    things they called him were gutless, a coward, and a small time guy who
    makes his league a small time conference.  They said he is completely
    intimidated by Chaney and that's why the A-10 would never be a big time
    program.  
    
    Bottom line was both Chris and Mike feel that Chaney may have warranted a
    lighter suspension with his apology, but he should still sit out until
    after the UMass game.
    
    NAZZ
77.570CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 16 1994 17:2112
>    
>    Despite the apology Mike and Chris both felt the suspension was way too
>    light, and they blasted A-10 commissioner Ron Bertovich.  Among the
>    things they called him were gutless, a coward, and a small time guy who
>    makes his league a small time conference.  They said he is completely
>    intimidated by Chaney and that's why the A-10 would never be a big time
>    program.  
>    

You should've heard them light into Eli yesterday too, when he started
his regular bs.....

77.571They can get carried away too...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 16 1994 17:3319
> You should've heard them light into Eli yesterday too, when he started
> his regular bs.....
    
    I didn't hear this, but to be fair, I was hearing some crap earlier 
    about what would have happened had this been Calapari tearing into 
    Chaney, and what the Black Coaches Association would have to say 
    about it, etc., that pre-supposed a lot of things in order to set up 
    a racially-based opposing strawman that wouldn't necessarily exist.  
    That's not fair...
    
    I have respect for Francesa, who I consider to be a knowledgeable guy, 
    but that other Mad Dog idiot was seriously challenging Chaney himself
    in the hysteria department.  Maybe he was looking for an A10
    suspension.  There definitely appeared to be some untold history
    involved with Bertovich.
    
    glenn
    
77.572CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 16 1994 17:4732
>    I didn't hear this, but to be fair, I was hearing some crap earlier 
>    about what would have happened had this been Calapari tearing into 
>    Chaney, and what the Black Coaches Association would have to say 
>    about it, etc., that pre-supposed a lot of things in order to set up 
>    a racially-based opposing strawman that wouldn't necessarily exist.  
>    That's not fair...

Well, Eli's whole point was that Chaney was just being picked on because
he was black.  Things got so intense that it was tough concentrating
on who was saying what (and trying to drive at the same time).   Eli,
who is more properly known as Eli from Westchester, has the rap of 
being a racist.  He's a regular caller and while lots of folks bash him,
sometimes he has good points.   I think he was a bit off yesterday though.

    
>    I have respect for Francesa, who I consider to be a knowledgeable guy, 
>    but that other Mad Dog idiot was seriously challenging Chaney himself
>    in the hysteria department.  Maybe he was looking for an A10
>    suspension.  There definitely appeared to be some untold history
>    involved with Bertovich.
    
Russo gets worked up but I've grown to enjoy him.  He's definitely a
character, and in some ways he reminds me of Jim Dinsmore.   But he's no
dope and he does a fairly good job.

As to what might have happened with Bertovich, I know that most of the
sports hosts have been calling for a 5 game suspension, so I don't know
any more than that.


I missed something, btw.... How much did Chany get?  Just the one game?

77.573Un****believeableAKOCOA::BREENWed Feb 16 1994 17:513
    >Well, Eli's whole point was that Chaney was just being picked on
    >because he was black
    
77.574That's show biz...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 16 1994 18:0616
                                                            
    >Well, Eli's whole point was that Chaney was just being picked on
    >because he was black
    
    Well, I've heard this guy before, and I may be dead wrong about this,
    but I consider Eli to be about 95% an act, who predictably sets people
    off with the mere mention of his name.  I get the impression that 
    because he can create some controversy he's WFAN's most valuable caller
    in the evenings.  They sure as heck don't try to dissuade or downplay
    the guy; exactly the opposite.  It's usually "well, you know what Eli's 
    going to say about this" and of course he takes the bait.  I wouldn't
    be the slightest bit surprised to learn that he's on the payroll, or
    at least has been slid a few gratuities over the years...
    
    glenn
    
77.57538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 16 1994 18:471
    Did Doc Midnight move to Westchester?
77.576CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 16 1994 18:5811
Eli is for real.  He played lineman on a team in the NFL, and he's
a bit like Doc.  Although he'd probably say Willis Reed > Russell, instead.

He stirs things up no doubt.


Did anyone catch Bernard McGirk pulling a fast one on Salsberg the other
afternoon?  It was hysterical....


'saw
77.577I miss the DrM...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 16 1994 19:5912
                      
> Eli is for real.  He played lineman on a team in the NFL, and he's
> a bit like Doc.
    
    Doc is a leg-puller extraordinaire, though.  We BS'd for about three
    hours at that last get-together and while I couldn't remember many of 
    the specifics the next morning, he's really pretty conservative, maybe 
    even a Republican (don't tell him I said that).  ;-)  Other than that 
    Wilt business he's pretty straight...
    
    glenn
        
77.578theres a reason for everything...SALEM::STIGDogmanWed Feb 16 1994 23:434
    the reason that chaney blew up was obviously family problems...his
    outburst is becoming more clearer now...
    
        stig
77.579CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Feb 17 1994 00:0113
    -1 
    Stig,
    I was scratching mah haid at Chaney's emotional speech about
    his wife leaving the house and his daughter not speaking to
    him after his outburst. Not to be judgmental but there
    unfortunately might be a little more under the kimono.
    Purty sad if true.
    
    Oh no.. John Chaney as "victim" stories..
    
    
    MikeL
    
77.580CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 11:4911
That, as it later turned out, was Chaney's attempt at humor.

They were talking with Calipari on WFAN yesterday and it turned out
that Chaney's wife didn't really leave him, rather, it was his way
of taking a shot at himself, as in "I f***ed up so bad my wife left
me -- heh heh heh"

I personally don't think that 1 game is enough, apology or no.  JMHO.


'Saw
77.581CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Feb 17 1994 12:116
    
    Well hush my mouth. If that was an attempt at humor then he should keep
    the day job.
    
    MikeL
    
77.582CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 12:3318
>    Well hush my mouth. If that was an attempt at humor then he should keep
>    the day job.
    
Well, I personally thought it was in poor taste.  You don't come within
millimeters of blowing out the major blood vessels in your head because
you've completely lost it and are behaving maniacally, then make jokes
the next day.

Plus, it took the guy a day to make up his mind to do it.   That's pretty
poor too.

I agree with Francesa when he says that Chaney is "bigger than the league".

I think he should have gotten 5 games.


'Saw    

77.583MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 12:4829
re .581
    
  >> Well hush my mouth. If that was an attempt at humor then he should keep
  >> the day job.
    
     Physician heal thyself. At least this nips your perpetrator-as-victim
     spiel in the bud. Goodness knows I wasn't looking forward to that. Again.
     
re .582    

  >> Well, I personally thought it was in poor taste.  You don't come within
  >> millimeters of blowing out the major blood vessels in your head because
  >> you've completely lost it and are behaving maniacally, then make jokes
  >> the next day.

     Because? What he suppose to do, open an artery? The guys offered a heart-
     felt apology and tried to show everyone that he's a human being, too.
     Personally, I think it's nice to see that John Chaney isn't just a coach
     with the intensity level of a wolverine on speed.  Obviously, nothing is 
     going to be good enough for some folks. Honestly, Saw, did you even know 
     or care who John Chaney was before this incident?

  >> Plus, it took the guy a day to make up his mind to do it.   That's pretty
  >> poor too.

     How long is an acceptable period of time? It probably took that long for 
     him to calm down and realize what a fool he'd made of himself.
    
    
77.584CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 12:5748
>     Because? What he suppose to do, open an artery? The guys offered a heart-
>     felt apology and tried to show everyone that he's a human being, too.

I don't know about opening an artery.  That might be a bit extreme.  Perhaps
a few days in a pillary might be in order.

If I were him, I'd have apologized the next day.  I'd have called a press
conference, and done a few mea culpas.   But hey, at least he did apologize,
instead of taking the attitude that so many folks do...


>     Personally, I think it's nice to see that John Chaney isn't just a coach
>     with the intensity level of a wolverine on speed.  Obviously, nothing is 
>     going to be good enough for some folks. 

If I came into your office in a rage, bumping and jostling your co-workers and
told you I'd kill you, do you think that I'd get off with just offering an
apology two days later, and being suspended from a day of work?   



>Honestly, Saw, did you even know 
>     or care who John Chaney was before this incident?

What does that matter?   What bearing does that have on my forming an
opinion?   Do I have to have followed Temple basketball for 15 years,
and know all of Chaney's stats to have an opinion?   I didn't realize
that we had "admission qualifications" to have an opinion on incidents
that take place in the world.


I knew who Chaney was before the incident.   I paid attention to everything
that happened because it was something that stood out to me, just like
Woody Hayes smacking that kid stood out


>     How long is an acceptable period of time? It probably took that long for 
>     him to calm down and realize what a fool he'd made of himself.

I don't know.  Where I come from, and the way I was raised, threatening to
kill someone,  and acting like a wild-eyed maniac, is pretty good evidence
that you're making a fool of yourself.   If it took him that long to calm
down, and that long to realize what a fool he is, perhaps he ought to think
about a nice vacation someplace very quiet, and very laid back.

'Saw    
    

77.585What's with this "submit before us" media routine?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 17 1994 13:0915
    If Chaney needed to make that public apology to set things right with
    himself, then I applaud it.  If he didn't want to and hadn't, I would
    have no problem with that either.  There's something a little silly
    about getting outraged to a fever pitch about something like Chaney's 
    behavior, and then after the apology reporting that everything's wonderful
    again, John Chaney says he's sorry.  This appears to be the 15-minute-pack-
    media mentality.  Pay your dues to us, John, and we'll go away and leave
    you alone; after all, we're all in this industry together, nobody wants
    too much trouble.  Of course if there really are problems with Chaney
    personally or professionally they're not at all addressed, apologies,
    reprimands, suspensions notwithstanding... 
    
    glenn
    
77.58638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 13:126
77.587toungue in cheek naturallyCNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 17 1994 13:1317
> If I came into your office in a rage, bumping and jostling your co-workers and
> told you I'd kill you, do you think that I'd get off with just offering an
> apology two days later, and being suspended from a day of work?   


 Wouldn't this be grounds for a promotion to management around here? I thought
 it wasn't what you know but how well you can KA or intimidate your fellow
 employees as qualifications.

 Given the circumstances, a tough loss, the bad blood already between these
 twos and the fact that Calpari is a good instigator, I think the one game
 suspension is just enough punishment. Of course I probably would have made
 that one game be the rematch instead of against St. Bonnies but the powers
 that be (TV) would have squaked mightly. 

 mike
77.588MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 13:1930
 >> If I came into your office in a rage, bumping and jostling your co-
 >> workers and told you I'd kill you, do you think that I'd get off with 
 >> just offering an apology two days later, and being suspended from a day 
 >> of work?   

    If I came into your office and started swinging punches do you think that
    I'd get 5 minutes in the penalty box? Sorry, but you're analogy doesn't
    work for me. Something said, however regrettable, after a tough game with
    your chief rival isn't to be taken in the same context as something said in 
    an staid environment like an office building.

 >> What does that matter?   What bearing does that have on my forming an
 >> opinion?   Do I have to have followed Temple basketball for 15 years,
 >> and know all of Chaney's stats to have an opinion?   I didn't realize
 >> that we had "admission qualifications" to have an opinion on incidents
 >> that take place in the world.

     I'm hearing all these negative comments about Chaney by folks who never
     so much as breathed his name before including people like yourself who
     have even said they don't even *like* or *watch* basketball. Now, all of
     a sudden we have this cause celebre and the people who want to take a
     shot at John Chaney come out of the woodwork. This incident doesn't de-
     fine John Chaney anymore than the most shameful thing that you or I have 
     ever done defines us. What Chaney did wrong and if he ever does it again
     he should be fired but it's over. He gave a heartfelt apology and the 
     person most hurt by this was Chaney himself. Enough already.
    

    
77.589CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 13:4211
>    But it's OK to make Tonya Harding/Nancy Kerrigan jokes?

Show me where I said that.

That's a story that has received far more media attention than it ever
should have.  It's a story everyone is sick of...except for the folks
who can't live without thoses tabloid news shows.....


'Saw

77.59038346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 13:446
    You didn't say that, but you certainly didn't object to the jokes that
    were entered in here the same way you objected to Chaney's attempt at
    humor.
    
    What exactly is too much media attention?  Are you sure this stuff on
    Chaney hasn't reached that yet?
77.591CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 13:5041
>
>    If I came into your office and started swinging punches do you think that
>    I'd get 5 minutes in the penalty box? Sorry, but you're analogy doesn't
>    work for me. Something said, however regrettable, after a tough game with
>    your chief rival isn't to be taken in the same context as something said in 
>    an staid environment like an office building.
>

The bottom line is that it wasn't in the arena of competition.  It was
in a press conference, after the fact.  Chaney blew up, just literally 
blew up, and made threatening statements, and bumped and jostled people.

If you came into the post game press conference and duked it out with someone
you wouldn't get five minutes either, you'd get arrested for assualt, most
likely.

Chaney blew, and bottom line, he's very lucky that a) the league caved
and left him with one game off, and b) he wasn't arrested.....


>     I'm hearing all these negative comments about Chaney by folks who never
>     so much as breathed his name before including people like yourself who
>     have even said they don't even *like* or *watch* basketball. Now, all of
>     a sudden we have this cause celebre and the people who want to take a
>     shot at John Chaney come out of the woodwork. This incident doesn't de-
>     fine John Chaney anymore than the most shameful thing that you or I have 
>     ever done defines us. What Chaney did wrong and if he ever does it again
>     he should be fired but it's over. He gave a heartfelt apology and the 
>     person most hurt by this was Chaney himself. Enough already.
    

So what?  

The rest of us are just exercising our right to express our opinions.
Chaney left himself open to that when he acted insanely.  That's life.

I'm not taking a shot at him, I don't like or dislike him, but I think
he behavior was kind of appalling, and I was surprised that he only
got a game.....    

'Saw
77.592And he has lousy comedic timing like me.. 8^)CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Feb 17 1994 14:0113
    Who is making "negative" comments about Chaney?
    All the comments I've read and made are about his performance in this
    one incident. There's no damnable judgment of the man from any
    comments in here. And what difference does it make if you or I know
    anything about Chaney? I happened to know who he is and that he
    has built Temple and the A10 into a damn good conference, but that
    has nothing to do with my interpretation of his performance in this
    one incident.
    
    He was dead wrong, out of control, apologized, and that's it.
    
    MikeL
    
77.593I only object to the accusation of cheap-shotting...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 17 1994 14:0120
>     I'm hearing all these negative comments about Chaney by folks who never
>     so much as breathed his name before including people like yourself who
>     have even said they don't even *like* or *watch* basketball. Now, all of
>     a sudden we have this cause celebre and the people who want to take a
>     shot at John Chaney come out of the woodwork.
    
    I agree with you that enough is enough on this incident but I still
    reject this characterization, Tommy.  For some reason one of the top
    subjects in this forum over the years has been college basketball 
    coaches and John Chaney has received his share of attention.  Last year 
    it was around those reports of Chaney telling his kids to go after the
    Michigan players because they were showboating in a game where they
    were trouncing Temple.  There have been other incidents in the past, too. 
    Regardless of what one thinks of him Chaney has been a controversial 
    figure so to say that this one has just come out of the blue is not 
    accurate... 
    
    glenn
    
77.594MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 14:1512
 >> Who is making "negative" comments about Chaney?
 >> All the comments I've read and made are about his performance in this
 >> one incident. There's no damnable judgment of the man from any
 >> comments in here. 

    How about this for starters?

   "John Chaney thrives on intimidation.  His ego is boundless, so the fack
    that Calipari can match him ego-for-ego undoubtedly goes right up his
    u_know_what."
    
    
77.595MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 14:199
  >>  Regardless of what one thinks of him Chaney has been a controversial 
  >>  figure so to say that this one has just come out of the blue is not 
  >>  accurate... 
    
      To say that I said that "this has just come out of the blue" isn't
      accurate either. In fact, it's dead wrong. And I don't remember ever 
      reading damn thing about John Chaney in here until now.     
    
77.596This is the guy who called John Wooden an egomaniac...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 17 1994 14:1910
>   "John Chaney thrives on intimidation.  His ego is boundless, so the fack
>    that Calipari can match him ego-for-ego undoubtedly goes right up his
>    u_know_what."
    
    That doesn't count.  That's just Dean and ACChris taking out two
    competitors with one stone... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
77.597MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 14:2610
 >> So what?  

    So you didn't watch the game. But that's understandable because
    you don't even like basketball. But somehow you're filled with
    all of this righteous indignation because John Chaney only got a
    game suspension. I fail to see why you even care. You admit that
    you know nothing about the guy or the game. It seems to me that 
    that idiot Francesa has you all wound up about nothing.
    
77.598What's the point?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 17 1994 14:2714
    
>      To say that I said that "this has just come out of the blue" isn't
>      accurate either. In fact, it's dead wrong. And I don't remember ever 
>      reading damn thing about John Chaney in here until now.     
    
    Well, whatever.  I know I have in the past.  In any case, that's a
    pretty tough standard, and I don't agree that it indicates prior 
    ignorance on the part of anyone who makes a comment.  I haven't made
    any comment on Billy Tubbs in the last couple years, but just in case
    the subject comes up, I want to go on record that I want to see him
    fired, yesterday if not sooner...
                                     
    glenn
     
77.599MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 14:4215
    >> -< What's the point? >-

    >> Well, whatever.  I know I have in the past.  In any case, that's a
    >> pretty tough standard, 
  
       You should have been a politician. You go from "Chaney has received
       his share of attention" to "what's the point".  Which is it? Either
       he has or he hasn't.

    >> and I don't agree that it indicates prior ignorance on the part of 
    >> anyone who makes a comment.  

       What are you talking about? Serioulsy./
     
    
77.600METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseThu Feb 17 1994 14:4917
Tommy, There were almost no comments in here about Harding before the incident
with Kerrigan. Yet I never heard you say "none of you spoke about these 
people before, how can you do that now?" This kind of argument is just
a smokescreen to divert the discussion from Chaney. Why you want to do
that I'm not sure but be man enough to admit that is what you are
doing.

Back to Chaney: 'Saw gotta disagree on the suspension thing. Sure Chaney
has complained about officials, etc. But so have lots of other coaches;
some get away with it better than other - for multiple reasons. The news
conference was close enough to the games end that it can still be called
the "heat of the battle." What Chaney did was wrong, but 1 game for a first
offense like this fits. Heck, Bobby Knight should be suspended very often,
yet he has been only once by IU. In the context of what sooooo many coaches
do and get away with 1 game works.

The Crazy Met
77.601Part of the gCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Feb 17 1994 14:5012
>>    How about this for starters?

>>   "John Chaney thrives on intimidation.  His ego is boundless, so the fack
>>    that Calipari can match him ego-for-ego undoubtedly goes right up his
>>    u_know_what."
  
    Taking this comment at face value, what is so negative about this?
    It probably belongs on most college coach's dossier.
    
    MikeL
      
    
77.602MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 15:0020
 >>Tommy, There were almost no comments in here about Harding before the 
 >>incident with Kerrigan. Yet I never heard you say "none of you spoke 
 >>about these people before, how can you do that now?" This kind of arg-
 >>ument is just a smokescreen to divert the discussion from Chaney. Why 
 >>you want to do that I'm not sure but be man enough to admit that is what 
 >>you are doing.

    If I've said anything about Harding and Kerrigan it's that neither of 
    them deserve the attention that's being paid to them nor does Kerrigan
    deserve all the cash that's flowing her way just because she was
    assaulted. I have as much as said that I wish they would both go away.
    Likewise, neither does this Chaney incident deserve all of the play that 
    it's getting nor should his entire life be judged by this incident. Be-
    sides, most of the talk around Harding and Kerrigan has and does center 
    around Harding's culpability, that is not an issue with Chaney. He did 
    it. He was punished. Enough already. Between you trying to read my mind
    and Glenn putting words in my mouth, I don't know which is worse.
    
    
77.603CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 15:2945
>
>    So you didn't watch the game. But that's understandable because
>    you don't even like basketball. But somehow you're filled with
>    all of this righteous indignation because John Chaney only got a
>    game suspension. I fail to see why you even care. You admit that
>    you know nothing about the guy or the game. It seems to me that 
>    that idiot Francesa has you all wound up about nothing.
>    

Gee, I didn't realize that what I'm interested in had to meet with your
approval.

It's really simple.

I don't particularly care for basketball.  I'll watch it from time to time,
especially if it's a team I like.

I don't need to know all about John Chaney to form an opinion of his
actions the other day.  I did see the last part of the game, btw, as if
that makes a big difference.  Well, I suppose it does, because if Chaney
hadn't have lost, he might not have acted like a maniac.


I care, because I like sports in general, and because it was obviously
an issue that came up in sports in general.  Just like I felt really bad
about Michael Jordan's dad even though that has to do with basketball.

I think that what Chaney did was wrong.  I think he apologized, and that
was good, but I also think he got away with a lot because the league
didn't have the balls to do something about it.   I don't have to like
basketball or know what size underwear Chaney wears to form that opinion.


As to Francesa, he's no more of an idiot than you are, and the guy knows
his sports.  It didn't take Francesa to get me all wound up, because
I'm not "all wound up".  I'm just expressing an opinion.

To see "all wound up", look at John Chaney......


hth,
'Saw



77.604Weak, Tommy, weak...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 17 1994 15:3511
    
>    Between you trying to read my mind
>    and Glenn putting words in my mouth, I don't know which is worse.
    
    I fail to see the difference in meaning between criticism coming "out 
    of the woodwork" and "out of the blue", if that's the source of the 
    problem.  Are you retracting the claim that this is simply a case of
    people coming out of the woodwork to take a shot at John Chaney?
    
    glenn
    
77.605Weak, Glenn, weakMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 15:446
    
     The "out of the blue" was in reference to this being a single
    incident. The "out of the wood work" was in reference to folks like
    Saw piling on this non-issue.
    
    HTH
77.606MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 16:0219

 >> I think that what Chaney did was wrong.  

    Gee, thanks for clearing that up, Saw.

 >> As to Francesa, he's no more of an idiot than you are, and the guy knows
 >> his sports.  It didn't take Francesa to get me all wound up, because
 >> I'm not "all wound up".  I'm just expressing an opinion.

    Sports talk radio is for people who are so devoid a real life that they
    waste their free time listening to *other* people talk about sports.
    You may not be wound up but I've never heard you say anything about
    college b-ball other than a snippet here about UConn and a shot there
    at ACC Chris. Now all of a sudden you're crying for capital punishment
    for Chaney and much of it seems driven by what your guru Francesa says.
    I hope you're not tithing a portion of your paycheck to this guy.

    
77.607Temple TangentLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Feb 17 1994 16:1818
      Just because everyone's talking about Chaney, but to go on
      a tangent...
    
      What's the starting lineup of the Temple team that was ranked
      #1 throughout almost the entire year, but lost (I think) to
      Duke?
    
      I know of the following
    
      G Mark Macon
    
      F Vreezwyk (sp?)
    
      C Ramon Rivas
    
      BEAUTIFUL team!  Excellent chemistry, but only 5 men deep.
    
                                                 Tony
77.608Tim Perry?CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 17 1994 16:250
77.609can't do music 24 hours a dayFRETZ::HEISERask me about my vow of silenceThu Feb 17 1994 16:265
>    Sports talk radio is for people who are so devoid a real life that they
>    waste their free time listening to *other* people talk about sports.
    
    I listen to it while I'm working, and don't have access to a life
    during working hours, so it doesn't apply here.
77.610FRETZ::HEISERask me about my vow of silenceThu Feb 17 1994 16:301
    yeah Tim Perry was on that team.
77.611CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 17:0753
|
| >> I think that what Chaney did was wrong.  
|
|    Gee, thanks for clearing that up, Saw.

You're welcome.



|    Sports talk radio is for people who are so devoid a real life that they
|    waste their free time listening to *other* people talk about sports.
|    You may not be wound up but I've never heard you say anything about
|    college b-ball other than a snippet here about UConn and a shot there
|    at ACC Chris. Now all of a sudden you're crying for capital punishment
|    for Chaney and much of it seems driven by what your guru Francesa says.
|    I hope you're not tithing a portion of your paycheck to this guy.

Gee, Tommy, since you're such an expert on what real life is, perhaps you
should quit Digital and write a book.

I don't have to defend or explain what I do to you or anyone else.  But
I just find it a helluva lot more interesting on the ride to and from
work to listen to what's going on in the world of sports, and listen to
a variety of opinions, and sift through and find what I like, what I don't
like and think about the rest.

I guess if it doesn't come from some cutting-edged author who dumps his
or her opinion on the pages and finds some publishing house to publish
it, it isn't any good.


I don't usually say much about college basketball, which I like better
than pro hoops, but am not passionate over, but this isn't a basketball
issue.  I'd be saying something if this was baseball or football too.

I don't want capital punishment for Chaney. I reserve that for people like
the a__hole in Tulsa the other day.

As to Mike Francesa, I've learned a lot from listening to him, and if anything,
what I've learned has, if anything, increased what little interest I have in
basketball.  As I've learned what to watch for, it makes watching the game more
enjoyable.   But I don't have to explain that to you or anyone else.


All I was saying was that in my opinion, Chaney got away very lightly
considering what he did.  I think he should of got more.  I don't know
why you find the fact that I have an opinion so distasteful.....




    

77.61238346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 17:152
    Wow, 53 lines to not explain something to anybody.  I hate to see what
    happens when he wants to explain something.
77.613MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 17:2310
    
     You're right, Saw. You're perfectly entitled to your opinion.
    Just like I'm entitled to my opinion that sports talk radio makes 
    about as much sense as televised fishing. But it just seems to me
    that Chaney is an easy target. He screwed up bad and everyone 
    knows it and now even folks who thought Temple University was
    in Tel Aviv are taking shots at him. As for Francesa, I can't
    imagine what you've learned from him but if you say you've learned
    something...
    
77.614No real life? Wow, that one hurts...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 17 1994 17:2512
    
    If Mike Francesa is working as CBS' basketball analyst for the NCAAs
    again this year, I hope Tommy has the mute button ready.  We wouldn't 
    want anybody observing him watching/listening to the guy misconstruing
    it as having no real life... ;-)
    
    Maybe they should all be like Dick Vitale.  Hey baby, that Coach
    Tarkanian, what a great guy, heart of gold, he's been misinterpretated, 
    ba-beeeee...  
    
    glenn
    
77.615I'm with 'Saw, sports radio is coolFRETZ::HEISERask me about my vow of silenceThu Feb 17 1994 17:335
>I guess if it doesn't come from some cutting-edged author who dumps his
>or her opinion on the pages and finds some publishing house to publish
>it, it isn't any good.
    
    I guess Tommy looks to writers the way I look to guitarists.
77.616MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 17:3820
    
  > If Mike Francesa is working as CBS' basketball analyst for the NCAAs
  > again this year, I hope Tommy has the mute button ready.  We wouldn't 
  > want anybody observing him watching/listening to the guy misconstruing
  > it as having no real life... ;-)
   
    I've never paid Francesa any attention and I'm not about to start
    now. I didn't even remember that he did last year's tourney until
    you mentioned it. What he has to say won't add or detract from my 
    enjoyment of the tourney, the best event in all of sports. 

  > Maybe they should all be like Dick Vitale.  Hey baby, that Coach
  > Tarkanian, what a great guy, heart of gold, he's been misinterpretated, 
  > ba-beeeee...  
   
    There you go with your red herrings again. No one has mentioned or cares
    about Dick Vitale. Don't automatically assume that just because I don't
    tune in to hear what Jerry from East Bridgeport thinks about the Kendall 
    Gill trade (there's entertainment for ya) that I'm a Vitale fan.    
    
77.617Awfully sensitive...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 17 1994 17:4712
                                           
>    There you go with your red herrings again. No one has mentioned or cares
>    about Dick Vitale. Don't automatically assume that just because I don't
>    tune in to hear what Jerry from East Bridgeport thinks about the Kendall 
>    Gill trade (there's entertainment for ya) that I'm a Vitale fan.    
    
    Don't automatically assume that because I've said that I have some
    respect for a guy who usually deals in hard critical nuts-and-bolts
    analysis (and been paid for it by CBS) that it has anything to do 
    with what you think of Dick Vitale.  This has to do with my own 
    personal battle against having no real life...
    
77.619Why I sometimes listen to talk showsTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeThu Feb 17 1994 18:0115
    I find much of talk radio self-indulgent (Andleman and Carr, for two
    examples), but I enjoy talkmasters who can intelligently present an
    opinion and expand upon ideas and issues in a rational, intelligent
    manner.  Mike Francesa and David Brudnoy fall into that category.
    I don't agree very often with Brudnoy's politics, but I admire his
    intelligence, his ability to listen, and his eclectic view on life.
    
    Mike (and the Mad Dog) are very informative, have on guests who are
    involved directly with topical issues, and provide a forum for sharing
    information that is always timely and occasionally valuable.  Every
    chance I get i listen to them on the way home from work, as opposed to
    a fathead like Andleman, whose only interested in self-promotion and
    whose lack of knowledge about sports is appalling.
    
    NAZZ
77.620exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 18:0719
    
   >> Don't automatically assume that because I've said that I have some
   >> respect for a guy who usually deals in hard critical nuts-and-bolts
   >> analysis (and been paid for it by CBS) 
    
      Was it Francesa that gave you the crazy idea that it was some kind 
      of crime that Phoenix fans wouldn't be able to see ten whole basket-
      ball games on free tv or that there ought to be some kind of weight
      limit on defensive linemen? I hope not.
    
   >> that it has anything to do  with what you think of Dick Vitale. 
    
      Why even bring his name up?
    
    >> This has to do with my own personal battle against having no real life...
    
       A losing battle by all accounts.
    
    
77.621amazing but trueFRETZ::HEISERask me about my vow of silenceThu Feb 17 1994 18:093
    If it wasn't for sports talk shows, and their interviews with people
    all over the country, I wouldn't know how well respected the Suns are
    all over the USA!
77.622MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 17 1994 18:106
    
  > If it wasn't for sports talk shows, and their interviews with people
  > all over the country, I wouldn't know how well respected the Suns are
  > all over the USA!
    
    I rest my case.
77.623I was yankin yer chain, monFRETZ::HEISERask me about my vow of silenceThu Feb 17 1994 18:121
    
77.624METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseThu Feb 17 1994 18:176
yabbut, remember Tommy is a firm believer that if 'yer yankin' on someone
you should put in a smiley.

The Crazy Met

oh yeah :-)
77.625:-) x 1000FRETZ::HEISERask me about my vow of silenceThu Feb 17 1994 18:211
    oh yeah, thanks TCM, I forgot. 
77.626Just Need Somebody To Shove...LUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Feb 17 1994 18:3619
      Hey Tommy,
    
        You sure maybe you just might need someone to shove?  ;-)
    
        And as far as the best thing in sports...are you sure its better
        than watching Wisconsin WHIP UCLA???!  ;-)  (just kidding)
    
        By the way...Ramon Rivas of that Temple team reminds me of
        how 'unlearned' annoouncers can be.  I remember Stockton (I
        think it was) commentating a Temple tournament game and saying
        of Rivas "Those are NBA hips" to which Packer replied, "You'll
        never see those hips in the NBA!"  (I think it was Packer.)
    
        That was one of my more favorite sports quotes.
    
        Come to think of it though...Rivas played in the NBA for a
        short while.
    
                                                Tony
77.627Bigger than the leagueOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Feb 17 1994 18:4415
    I listen to M & MD from time to time. I switch to them when I think
    they have the most entertaining show. Many times they are able to get
    the important people related to a big story and 2/16 was such a day.
    
    The interviews with Calipari,the UMASS prez and the A10 rep showed a 
    consistency where everyone was scared to criticize Chaney(for the good of 
    the league).
    
    It was easy to form the opinion that he is bigger than the league and the
    league leaders knew that it would be more destructive to give him the
    just suspension that everyone knows he should have gotten(at least 5
    games). 
    
    It doesn't take a talk show for me to form an opinion,but sometimes it
    's nice to hear other opinons that might add a different viewpoint.
77.628DZIGN::ROBICHAUDTonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkankThu Feb 17 1994 19:014
    	I'd lay 5-1 odds that if you asked MadDog Russo what the state
    capital of New York was, he wouldn't know.
    
    				/Don
77.629CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Feb 18 1994 11:196
>
>    Wow, 53 lines to not explain something to anybody.  I hate to see what
>    happens when he wants to explain something.
>

Bugger off.....
77.630CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Feb 18 1994 11:2415
WFAN tends to have a lot of sports news on their talk shows, they get 
the top guests of the moments and by listening to the various opinions
expressed, you can get a pretty good idea of what's going on in the sports
world.

There is obviously going to be a New York slant, which means I miss a little
Boston slant during baseball season, but the rest of the time it's not
too bad.

I know more about what's going on in the sports world, and sooner, by 
listening to WFAN on the ride in and the ride home, and when I'm headed
out.....


/Don, Mad Dog *IS* the Dinz.....
77.631MSE1::FRANCUSBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseFri Feb 18 1994 14:287
    re: New York slant, not Boston slant
    
    'Sawmain you aren't missing anything. you're better off with that
    setup.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.632DZIGN::ROBICHAUDTonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkankFri Feb 18 1994 14:581
    	I don't know Craze, your P-Name seems to indicate differently.
77.633CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Feb 18 1994 16:246
Well, I like the Giants, so during football season it's fine.

During baseball season I listening to the FAN but also catch Arnold
Dean on WTIC (which is local here in Harfaa).....

'Saw
77.634Crunch time begins for the MinutemenTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeMon Feb 21 1994 16:3917
    Midnight Madness was fun (took my oldest as part of his 16th birthday
    celebration), but yesterday was a game UMass had to have, and they
    were up to the task, beating West Virginia by seven.  Coach Cal got a
    tremendous lift from his bench, as Marcus Camby sat out the game with
    the flu, and Lou Roe is nursing a sore ankle (he did play, though). 
    Both Rigo Nunez and Jeff Meyer had big games defensively off the bench,
    as W Va simply had no answer for UMass' pressure man to man down the
    stretch.  The winning surge for UMass came with a five of Meyer, Bright
    (who had another great game), Nunez, Padilla, and Kellogg on the floor.
    
    It doesn't get any easier for UMass.  Their remaining four games are a
    rematch with thee only team to thave beaten them in the league, St.
    Joseph's, tomorrow, then the trip to Temple thursday and on to GW in
    D.C. on Sunday.  Their final game of the regular season is home against
    tournament-bound Duquesne next Wednesday.
    
    NAZZ
77.635Yeah...Good GameSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Feb 21 1994 18:348
      One thing that surprised me about the game was how well
      UMass shot in the 2nd half - both fg % and free throws.
    
      Boy, for his first year of college play, Donta Bright
      certainly is looking good, isn't he?  Good all around
      play (inside shots, three pointers, defense).
    
                                          Tony
77.636Sounds like Donta has improved big-time since CinciAKOCOA::BREENMon Feb 21 1994 20:301
    
77.637Bright has been terrific; St. Joe's rematch tonightTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeTue Feb 22 1994 12:478
    The best thing about Bright is that he has become much more consistent
    over the past month.  He's always been a dependable rebounder and a
    good defender, but his offense has really stepped up a notch lately.
    He's not afraid to take the big shot, can really elevate to get his
    jumper off in traffic, and has improved his range enough so that he can
    even hit an occasional 3-pointer.
    
    NAZZ
77.638AKOCOA::BREENTue Feb 22 1994 17:566
    Actually Bright's talent showed vs Kentucky.  Redmen were very slow to
    get started vs cinci so it's unfair to pick out Bright.  Great comeback
    that night showed a lot.
    
    Definitely behind them all the way except if they play bc head to head
    in ncaas.
77.639U-Mass is playing good right now...SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Wed Feb 23 1994 01:123
    U-Mass bet up on St.Joes  99-73.
    
                stig
77.640Next up: Temple, Thursday at 9:30TNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeWed Feb 23 1994 12:4210
    Incredible second half spurt last night by UMass, keyed by the defense.
    The Minutemen scored a season-high 61 points in the 2nd half, shooting
    58%.  Bright, Nunez, Padilla, Kellogg, and Roe formed the five that took
    UMass on a 17-1 spurt early in the second half.  Five guys ended up in
    double figures:  Bright had 18 (and 10 boards), Mike Williams 17,
    Kellogg 15 (5-9 in 3 pointers), Roe 14 (also 10 boards), and Padilla
    had 13.  Nunez had six off the bench and was a key defensively.  Camby
    was ineffective in limited minutes.
    
    NAZZ
77.641Can Owls Get Rabies?STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Feb 23 1994 16:116
      We all know that Chaney will be in excellent behavior, but the
      Temple crowd will be RABID!!!!
    
      This is great...the game has got so much hype.
    
                                             Tony
77.642MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Feb 25 1994 16:3615
    
       Mike Williams has obviously sold his soul to the devil. 
      There's no way no how that his game winning 3 pointer with 
      8 seconds on the clock was intended to be a bank shot. But
      there it was, an arching banker that went ever so sweetly in
      and rendered a funereal silence over the Temple crowd. Be-
      fore he made his deal with Beelzebub, Mike was probably some
      middle-aged UMass alumnus, sick and tired of seeing the Minutemen
      lose to the Temple's of the world. Game after game, having his
      heart torn out. Enough! So he allowed himself to be enticed by 
      the Prince Of Darkness and his faithful assistant, the beautiful, 
      Lola and now he's a hero. I just hope he doesn't rethink the 
      deal before UMass takes it all. Mike, from what I hear, hell
      ain't that bad. I bet you're probably sick of all this snow any-
      ways.
77.643does he ever miss?CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopFri Feb 25 1994 16:464
hahha ain't it the truth Tommy.....

mike
77.644I lip read him yelling "glass!" when he let it fly. Really!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 25 1994 17:126
    re: Williams' Sold Soul
    
    Haw!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.645CTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Fri Feb 25 1994 17:286
    Yo,
    With Lola around does this mean that Mike will star in the
    new musical, "Damn Minutemen"?
    
    MikeL
    
77.646The little paisan can coach!!!TNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeFri Feb 25 1994 17:429
    That was as good a defensive performance as I've seen in a long time. 
    UMass played straight man-to-man defense until the shot clock got under
    10 seconds, then doubled up on whoever had the ball.  Brilliant
    strategy designed by Calipari.  Temple is one ugly team to watch, but
    they are very effective with what they do.  If I were the Minutemen, I
    would not look forward to having to beat them a third time to win the
    league championship.
    
    NAZZ
77.647"A few thoughts heading into Playoffs"MEMIT::W_TROYTue Mar 01 1994 22:3313
    A couple of quick thoughts after the GW loss this Sunday:
    
    o  Donta Bright continues to makes things happen - he is picking up the
    scoring slack as teams key on Roe - 
    o  Camby needs 20 pounds on him -  both times against GW, he got pushed
    around quite a bit.  Hope he hits the weights for arm strength.
    o  As a mid '70's UMIE - I think back to the best team UMASS had - with
    Skinner and Pitino in '74,  Eldridge et al in '76 and '77 - and I am
    continually proud of how the team is able to win BIG games - they never
    could back then.  
    
    I think that they are second seed candidates only if they win the A10
    tourney - but I think GW may just do it surprising Temple and UMASS. 
77.648Top Shelf Spin Control RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Mar 01 1994 23:195
    Except for that first sentence, I'd_a sworn UMass *won* the GW game. 
    Haw!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.649MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Tue Mar 01 1994 23:435
    ACC Chris you should be proud that someone can do almost as good a job
    as you in explaining an excellent loss.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.650MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 02 1994 12:2314
  >> Except for that first sentence, I'd_a sworn UMass *won* the GW game. 
  >> Haw!!
    
     This would make you think that UMass had won the game? 

     "Camby needs 20 pounds on him -  both times against GW, he got pushed
      around quite a bit.  Hope he hits the weights for arm strength."

     Are you saying that .647 is inaccurate? That Donta isn't a bright
     spot? [couldn't help myself] That this team, that beat your Tarheels
     and bitter rival Temple twice, doesn't win big games? 
      
     
77.651Lack of Objectivity regarding UMass hoops is revolting ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Mar 02 1994 13:5615
    I'm saying that .647 is guilty of self-denial.  UMass lost a game they
    should've won, and the 'L' will no_doubt impact NCAA seedings.  The
    fact that Camby needs to put on weight or that Bright had a half-way
    decent game is mindless fluff.
    
    Bottom Line: When the Hourmen win, we read zillions of notes 'bout how
    wunderful they are.  When they lose, we see a couple notes highlighting
    how wunderful they are.
    
    Bottom Bottom Line: I'd much rather have Carolina face UMass in the
    NCAA's than Temple.  The Hourmen are very beatable; playing The Owls is
    like a trip to the dentist for a root canal.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.653MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Mar 02 1994 14:5218
>               <<< Note 77.651 by RHETT::KNORR "Carolina Blue" >>>
>        -< Lack of Objectivity regarding UMass hoops is revolting ... >-
>
>    I'm saying that .647 is guilty of self-denial.  UMass lost a game they
>    should've won, and the 'L' will no_doubt impact NCAA seedings.  The
>    fact that Camby needs to put on weight or that Bright had a half-way
>    decent game is mindless fluff.

     Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.  What about Clemson vs UNC ?
     We could very well have said the same thing about RHETT::KNORR following
     that game.  No doubt that 'L' will have NO impact on the NCAA seedings,
     because the NCAA seems to want Dean to keep his streak of Sweet 16
     appearances alive, and a decent (#6) seed might knock him off before
     that point.

     The Minutemen are very beatable, but so is every ACC team this year.
     Frankly, I'd be surprised to see more than one ACC team in the Elite 8
     this year, and not at all surprised if none made it at all.
77.654PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 02 1994 15:015
77.655More ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Mar 02 1994 15:1718
    > Coming off a big victory and playing a tough GW squad that is peaking
    > at the right time, that game wasn't a gimme and certainly is no reas-
    > on for UMass fans to be slitting their wrists.
    
    And folks claim that I'm an excuse-maker?  Haw!  
    
    re: UNC < Clemson
    
    The difference is that I owned up to the fact that Carolina played
    horrendous basketball and fully deserved to lose.  No bright spots.
    No moral victories.  No excuses.  Just plain bad basketball.
    
    As for the ACC having zero teams in the Elite 8, I'll have to see that
    to believe it, although I'll admit it's VERY difficult to envision ANY
    ACC team other than Dook or UNC to even reach the Sweet 16.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.656"Blue missed the point"MEMIT::W_TROYWed Mar 02 1994 16:2315
    re: Mindless Fluff
    
    As a new noter to this conference - I guess ACC Blue (is that your
    mood, btw?) gave me a wake up call to post Notes conference etiquette.
    So noted.
    
    Be that as it may - my observations were not excuses, simply noting the
    relative rise of Mr. Bright in point production vs. Mr. Roe and Mr.
    Camby's need for strength, while he is certainly very agile.  Frankly,
    the game meant little to UMASS and everything to GW, coupled with the
    obvious matchup problems UMASS has with them.  
    
    
    
    
77.658Funny Stuff!LUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Mar 02 1994 17:1213
      Beautiful last couple of replies Tommy!  You sure had me
      laughing!!!
    
      ACC Chris, I'm sure your confidence in a UMass/NC contest
      is none other than the venerable Lenny "the worst" Wirtz!!!
    
      As far as UMass is concerned...I hope they make it to the
      3rd round and give whoever that team is a good game.
    
      I didn't feel good at all going into the GW game and right
      now GW looks to be playing as good as anyone else in the A10.
    
                                             Tony
77.659Meaningless game only if they don't care 'bout NCAA seedings...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Mar 02 1994 17:1314
    Now that Calipari is recruiting with the Big Boys of college
    basketball I think it's time we take off the kid gloves with this
    program.  Is it safe to say that failure to reach the Elite8 will
    constitute a disapointing campaign for the UMass?  [yes]
    
    > relative rise of Mr. Bright in point production vs. Mr. Roe
    
    I say we concentrate on why Roe's game has gone south.  He looked
    invisible against Temple, as did Camby for that matter.  Bright is a
    "nice" player, but let's face it, a Prop48 sophomore ain't gonna get
    you to the Promised Land. (i.e. Charlotte Coliseum)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.660So what is your point????BSS::MENDEZWed Mar 02 1994 17:374
    And a "stiff" like montross is going to get you to the promised land?
    
    Frank
    
77.661MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 02 1994 17:4731
   > -< Meaningless game only if they don't care 'bout NCAA seedings... >-

      Don't rightly recall no one calling it a meaningless game there,
      podner.

   >  Now that Calipari is recruiting with the Big Boys of college
   >  basketball I think it's time we take off the kid gloves with this
   >  program.  Is it safe to say that failure to reach the Elite8 will
   >  constitute a disapointing campaign for the UMass?  [yes]
    
      Not with only one senior and him not playing any significant
      minutes. What's more, their two best players are Roe and Mike 
      Williams, were either of those two recruited by certified big boy
      Dean-o?

   > I say we concentrate on why Roe's game has gone south.  He looked
   > invisible against Temple, as did Camby for that matter.  Bright is a
   > "nice" player, but let's face it, a Prop48 sophomore ain't gonna get
   > you to the Promised Land. (i.e. Charlotte Coliseum)
    
      Roe's game is suffering for many of the same reasons Montross' game
      is suffering. Teams are collapsing on him and UMass' perimeter game 
      is too spotty to make them pay for it or make 'em stop for that matter. 
      Camby played just fine against Temple doing what he does best and what 
      Montross can't, that's play defensive intimidator. He isn't the scoring 
      threat that he will be but we're patient. No one expects to get to 
      the promised land this year, they're awfully young. We're content to
      watch 'em take their first steps, we don't expect them to sprint yet.
      Next year though...
      
    
77.662Open NOTES, insert foot.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Mar 02 1994 18:139
    > And a "stiff" like montross is going to get you to the promised land?
    
    He already HAS gotten UNC to the promised land.
    
    
    TWICE!!  HAW!!!!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.663It already has been a great season!TNPUBS::NAZZAROGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!!!!Wed Mar 02 1994 18:1613
    Before this season started, I stated that I would be happy with 17-18
    wins and an NCAA tournament bid.  The fact that the Minutemen are 22-6
    with the incredibly difficult schedule they have and no seniors in 
    their 10 man rotation is remarkable.
    
    As for their NCAA tourney aspirations, I'm hoping to get into the Sweet
    16.  Anything more than that is gravy.  This team has shown they can
    win the close ones, which you need to do at tourney time.  Even their
    FT % is improving, which is also crucial in the tournament.  There are
    very few teams in the country as quick on defense as UMass and that
    quickness could carry them far in the tourney.
    
    NAZZ
77.664GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Mar 03 1994 12:3718
    RE:  77.659    
    
          "I say we concentrate on why Lou Roe's game has gone south"
    
    Lou Roe's line against the ACC this season:
    
    UNC            28 points 14 rebounds
    Maryland       30 points 12 rebounds
    Fla. State     15 points 14 rebounds
    
    Lou Roe's game might have gone south because A10 teams know something
    about playing interior defense, in particular Temple University.
    Based on the numbers above, and extrapolating it out over a season,
    if Roe played in the ACC, he, and not Grant Hill would be in the driver's 
    seat for ACC POTY! ;^)
    
    Russ
               
77.665MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Mar 03 1994 12:585
    yabbut Montross is the talent to end all talents, haven't you heard
    that?? :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.666GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Mar 03 1994 13:2540
         I was on hand last night for "senior night", the regular season 
    finale at Mullins, versus Duquesne.  Once again, UMASS played just well 
    enough to win, and escaped with a 92-78 victory.  The Minutemen opened up a
    couple of 15 point leads during the course of the game, but succeeded
    in giving those leads away with periods of uninspired, error filled
    basketball.  Duquesne even took a two point lead a couple of minutes
    into the second half.  For UMASS, Lou "south of the border" Roe (27p,
    15r) and Donta "don't call me Moses" Bright (18p, 11r) turned in nice
    games.
    
         UMASS' only senior, walk-on Craig Berry, was excorted to midcourt
    by his mother to a thundering ovation during the player intros, and
    drew his only career start, and played an error free opening three
    minutes.  Later during garbage time, Berry a 6' point guard threw
    down a monster reverse jam on a breakaway, a dunk that would have made
    Shawn Kemp or Harold Miner proud!  
    
         Now for the bad news.  With about 6 minutes left in the game,
    Mike Williams was pulled from the court after a sequence in which he 
    let his man drive by on the defensive end for an easy layup, a forced
    airball on the offensive end, and then a stupid foul back on the
    defensive end!  As play resumed, a commotion erupted on the bench
    (most of which I didn't see) and when things settled down, Williams
    was being restrained by Rigo Nunez, from going after Asst. Coach Bill Bayno.
    Later during the post game radio show, Calipari tersely stated that he
    didn't see the incident, and would have no comment until he talked
    to Bayno and Williams.  Williams has been suspended from the team for
    disciplinary reasons on at least two occasions during his career, so it
    will be very interesting to see how Calipari (and Williams) deal with
    this latest unfortunate episode.  My fear is, that regardless of what
    happens with Williams, the "karma" of the team has been put to risk
    just as the team is heading into the Tournaments.  I can't help but
    think back to last year, and the effect the suspension and eventual
    transfer of Jerome Malloy had on the team, just before the NCAA
    Tourney!  After playing very good ball in the A10 Tourney, UMASS went
    to Syracuse and squeaked by Penn and was trashed by UVA!  Clearly,
    UMASS needs a focused Mike Williams and his 15 ppg, and a "together"
    team, if they expect to advance to the upper echelons of the Big Dance!
    
    Russ  
77.667about Roe and Next YearWMOIS::BALL_KThu Mar 03 1994 13:4436
    RE:.654
    
       "he and not Grant Hill .....ACC POTY
    
    
    A little overstated maybe. Actually there probably several things going on:
    
    	- As the season has progressed, teams have figured out that Roe is
    the only inside scoring presence UMass has and the outside shooting
    (Kellogg, Williams, Padilla, and Bright) is streaky. So you pack it in
    a bit and hope the outside guys don't show.
    	- Related to the above, Kellogg, while being a hard worker, good
    defender, dependable..blah blah blah..  is not a great true point guard 
    (cannot penetrate and dish, is no Magic when it comes to creative
    passing or running the break.. although since he is shooting now he does 
    extend the defense a little) and hence Loe Doesn't get easy
    opportunites created for him [I personnally wish Malloy was still
    around, and Mike was at the point] 
    	- I think Camby isn't the only one that need some weight. Physical
    teams seem to have their way with UMASS, and to play P.F. more
    effectively, Loe could use 5 or 10 more lbs 
    	- More positively, the offensive emergence of Bright & Padilla and 
    continued offensive development of Williams & Kellogg has lessoned the
    load on Loe (he doesn't always need to score 25 or 30 for UMass to
    win)
    
    As far as next year goes, the team needs a solid backup for Camby ,6-8
    or more, (unless Meyer can improve as much this offseason as he did
    in the last one) and some more weight training for everybody on the
    front line, to truly have a shot at it all.
    
    						K.B. 
    
    
    
    
77.668"Any idea on TV for A10?"MEMIT::W_TROYThu Mar 03 1994 17:1718
    Re: A10 Playoffs
    
    Does anyone know if/where the A10 playoffs will be on one of the sports
    network games over next few days (ESPN, Sport Channel, NESN, etc.)? 
    Seems like we also got a a bit lucky with Duqesne.
    
    Also, In the Boston Globe today - there was a short article stating
    that the expansion of the Big East is not certain  - there is a
    continuing problem between the BBAll only schools and the
    Football/Basketball schools agreeing.  While the fines for leaving the
    Big East are large (~$2M) - it is possible that there might still be a
    reconfiguration to an all BBALL league including Notre Dame (which does
    not want to be in a football league), DePaul, UMASS, plus the GTown's,
    St. John's, Providence, etc,  with another league Football and
    Basketball.  Lots of complexity with TV deal also.
    
    
     
77.669CNTROL::CHILDSVadar, the world's greatest AthleteFri Mar 04 1994 12:168
 I think NESN has a contract with the A-10 so I expect that the A-10
 playoffs will be on NESN. ESPN has the ACC, CBS has the Big East,
 and ABC has the Big Ten but they don't have a tournement but they 
 do still have league to plays during the same week most leagues are
 in a tournement of some kind.......

 mike
77.670MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Mar 04 1994 12:348
    
     Ack Chris tries to give us the impression that there is something
    seriously wrong with Sweet Lou's game and Lou promptly goes out
    and racks up 27 points and 15 rebounds on the same night that
    UNC drops one to Wake Forest. Be honest, Ack, Montross never carried 
    UNC to the promised land. He was a role player on a team of role
    players. Any GM, who wastes a lottery pick on a player like Eric 
    who will be fortunate to be a career backup, should be shot.
77.671role player not career backupWMOIS::BALL_KFri Mar 04 1994 13:1628
    RE:.670
    
      "a player like Eric who should be fortunate to be a career backup"
    
    
    Again, I have to disagree (somewhat). Montross IS a lottery pick and
    probably the best true center that I'm aware of in the draft (It seems 
    to be a pretty thin draft center wise.  who's there? the guy from Clemson,
    Mobley from Pittsburg, Cherokee or Reeves (early) ? Big Deal Am I missing 
    anyone ?). The potentially  dominant centers are maybe a  year or 2 away 
    (Dare, R. Griffith, maybe Othella, Wallace and Camby ). 
    
    He, however, will NEVER be a dominant player ala Shaq,Ewing,Hakeem and worst
    case scenario, he'll be another Konkack...best case, I see him being
    Parish-like. not in longevity, but in terms of very solid, unspectacular
    play.
    
    If I were drafting, I obviously wouldn't take him before Robinson, Marshall
    , Hill, Kidd, or Rose (provided they all come out), but after that, It 
    wouldn't be a mistake (or not a huge one) 
                                                                     
    		
     					       KB
    
    P.S. 
    I was watching Golden State last night. I bet someone like
    Montross would a good enough center be enough to make that team a 
    championship contender. 
77.672There's a big dropoff...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Mar 04 1994 13:3011
                 
    We keep hearing about who is and who isn't a "lottery pick", but keep in
    mind that with all the recent expansion that designation includes 
    selections 1 through 11.  The difference between those first few picks
    and #11 is probably bigger than the difference between #11 and, say,
    #25.  Montross will certainly be picked before #11, he could become a
    marginal NBA stiff and career backup and it still wouldn't necessarily 
    be a mistake to draft him at #8-10.
    
    glenn
    
77.673MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Mar 04 1994 13:509
    
      I had forgotten that they amended the lottery and went from
     seven to eleven. Nonetheless, Eric would have to improve leaps
     and bounds just to be half as good as Robert Parish who is a
     lead pipe cinch to be a Hall Of Famer and was an integral part
     of three titles. Eric doesn't have Robert's range, his shot
     blocking ability, court sense or the really good "go to" move.
     If anything Eric reminds me a lot of a Joe Kleine type who has
     had a long but unspectaculr career.
77.674like Parish ?WMOIS::BALL_KFri Mar 04 1994 13:546
    re .673
    
    
    	I DID say  "best case scenario"
    
    					KB
77.675SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesFri Mar 04 1994 14:307
	What I don't want to even think about, is that the C's would
currently pick 8th. If the ping pong balls fell correctly. Just on the
bubble of where Montross will get drafted.


Ron
77.676the Boston Celtics select Eric MontrossWMOIS::BALL_KFri Mar 04 1994 15:087
    And with the C's need at center and their draft day reputation of
    always looking for the next "Great White Hope" (how else can you explain 
    Micheal Smith or Jon Barry....or good white hope maybe), they would 
    snap him up in a second.  too bad.
    
    							KB
    			
77.677CNTROL::CHILDSVadar, the world's greatest AthleteFri Mar 04 1994 15:096
 If the Celtics take Montross, I'm leading the Dave Gavitt lynching party!!
 We already got a UNC stiff in Brick Fox (tm), we don't need another overrated
 project, career backup.........

 mike
77.678Oh God, what a nightmareFRETZ::HEISERthe rock cries out!Fri Mar 04 1994 15:141
    don't make me gag!
77.679Not PossibleSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Mar 04 1994 19:498
      Even comparing Montross _at his best_ to Robert Parish is (to me)
      an incredible slap in the Chief's face!!
    
      It'll NEVER happen!!!
    
      It seemed to take Parish a couple of years to get his game on a
      par with the best during his time, but once he got it going, he
      was right up there with any of them.
77.680GIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Mar 08 1994 16:0828
         Well, it will be UMASS vs. Temple, the sequel, on Thursday night
    at the Mullins Center for the A10 Championship!  Just as on Sunday,
    UMASS played one half of stellar basketball, and defeated Duquesne by
    a 69-52 score.  Temple, held Yinka Dare scoreless, and advanced to the
    final with a 54-34 victory against GWU.  Temple must be on a mission,
    because George Washington and Dare had been playing very good
    basketball over the past 10 games leading up to the A10 Tourney!
    
         So what will Thursday's game be like?  If you enjoy watching 
    awesome defense, then you will be in for a treat.  If on the other
    hand you get off on offensive artistry, then you had best tune in to
    some other tournament, as the teams in this game will in all probability
    struggle to score a combined 100 points!
    
         Given that UMASS has registered two last second victories over
    the Owls this season, the law of averages has to favor Temple,
    regardless of home court advantage.  On the other hand, I believe
    Lou Roe has to feel slighted in not winning the A10 POTY Award, so
    he could break loose for a big game, and it is on ESPN.  According
    to Calipari, the only way to beat Temple is to work the ball inside
    to force the matchup zone to collapse, and then to kick it out and
    hit some three pointers.  And it goes without saying that on the other
    end, McKie, Jones and Brunson have to be kept somewhat in check!
    
         I'll pitch in with UMASS 55, Temple 49.
    
    Russ
                         
77.681TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHGotta go running - April is comingTue Mar 08 1994 16:482
Is GW "in" the NCAAs?  Seems like they should be on the bubble, but lots of 
folks talk like they are in.
77.682Good luck Minutemen, Thurs. You there, Russ?AKOCOA::BREENTue Mar 08 1994 17:107
    I'm not sure that losing will hurt umass' overall ncaa chances - a nice
    #2 see in the west might be perfect for them.
    
    How many times have I called them the Redmen lately, thank god for the
    sprot's senility clause
    
    Billte
77.683GW on the bubble,for sureOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Tue Mar 08 1994 17:123
    Their lousy showing against Temple may endanger their chances.
    Remember,they were one of the last at-large bids. Making the sweet 16 a
    year ago will help.
77.684"Two teams only to NCAAA????"MEMIT::W_TROYTue Mar 08 1994 17:1923
    re: .680             
    
    I agree on very low scoring and inside out offensive attack for
    Thursday, unless the 3's really connect.  
    
    re: .681  Right now I think that neither GW nor Duquesne helped
    themselves with their scond half swoons last night.  Duquesne's NCAA
    bubble burst - off to the NIT.  GW might also be out - I think the A10
    this year looks like 2 giants, with rest of pack pretty average.  I
    place 60% odds on only two teams, 30% on 3 teams, 10% on 4.  Big Ten,
    ACC, Big East, PAC 10, SEC, Big Eight perhaps even Great Midwest would
    be ahead.  Big 10 is awesome this year.
    
    re: GW soon.  I thought that they had a real shot to win A10 playoffs. 
    They are turning out to be too streaky.  One aside.  Bill Cosby on
    Sunday between halves at the UMASS game (looked a little loose, shall we
    say)  said some pretty derogatory things about Yinke Dare's coaches
    without using Jarvis' name -  saying basically that he was poorly
    coached, did not seem to know what to do on the floor, and was not
    using his physical skills to the extent he should be able to.
    
    Given the streakiness of GW - what do others think of Jarvis as a
    coach?
77.685In defense of Mike Jarvis...TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHGotta go running - April is comingTue Mar 08 1994 17:2714
77.686MeaninglessOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Tue Mar 08 1994 17:335
    UMASS-Temple III is essentially meaningless. Both teams will either be
    2 or 3 seeds no matter what. It means more to Temple's psyche than
    anything else.
    
    
77.687METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Mar 08 1994 17:363
Is the A10 championship on TV?

The Crazy Met
77.688DZIGN::ROBICHAUDBreastfed on falsiesTue Mar 08 1994 18:218
    RE: Mike Jarvis
    
    	After seeing the progression of Yinka Dare since last season I 
would say that Jarvis is doing a helluva job, especially when compared to 
the regression of a certain crew-cutted center who has been tutored by a 
supposed coaching "genius".

				/Don
77.689exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 08 1994 18:4914
    
      I think Bob mcCullough pretty mich nailed it on Jarvis.
     The guy has won at every level he's coached at whether 
     it was Cambridge Ringe and Latin, where he molded Pat
     Ewing and Rumeal Robinson, or at BU where he took the
     Terriers to the tourney. I don't think it's any coinci-
     dence that neither R&L or BU have acheived that same
     level of success since Jarvis left. It took Jarvis
     awhile to get this team playing the way he wanted them
     to, but until they got shut down by Temple, who can shut
     *anybody down, GW was one of the hottest teams in the
     country and at the right time of the year. The guy can
     coach.
      
77.690And add Wisconsin to the pug-ugly cusp listAKOCOA::BREENTue Mar 08 1994 19:138
    There will be a very general sigh of relief from the acc,big-8 and sec
    if GW is dropped from ncaa tournement.
    
    No one will want to play these guys just like noone will want to play
    Minnesota.
    
    Also if Big East is limited to 3 or 4 the primadonna conferences will
    be happy.
77.691"LOu Honorable mention All American"MEMIT::W_TROYWed Mar 09 1994 13:2916
    re: earlier note - UMASS/Temple is at 9:30 pm Thursday on ESPN.
    
    I agree with the noters that IF GW makes the 64, no one will want to
    play them - I think Minnesota is a better team than GW, but the analogy
    is a good one.
    
    re: Bill Cosby on Dare - You would think that the fellow who coached at
    C&L during the Ewing timeframe would know how to coach big men.  There
    may also be a work ethic involved for Dare - anyway, he is
    inconsistent.
    
    re: All American's - Lou Rowe is honorable mention (they only list two
    teams of 5 each) Interesting to note that One of the 5 "Player of the
    Year" candidates - Mr. Montross - is only Honorable mention.
    
    Those 'Heels sure have a good PR department.
77.693TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHGotta go running - April is comingWed Mar 09 1994 18:152
Dare has made dramatic progress already.  He has the potential to be a very 
dominant player nexted season.
77.694Dare is 7-1, 255, without an ounce of fat - he should dominateTNPUBS::NAZZAROGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!!!!Wed Mar 09 1994 18:459
    I respectfully disagree, Bob.  Dare made next to no progress this
    season.  Can you imagine Akeem or Patrick being held scoreless in a
    tournament game in their sophomore years?  Although he did have a big
    game vs UMass a couple of weeks ago, he is far too inconsistent for
    someone with his incredible physical gifts.  Fer cryin' out loud, Chuck
    Weiler of Rutgers was second to Camby in blocked shots in the A-10 this
    season, not Dare.
    
    NAZZ
77.695"News on Big East additions from A10"MEMIT::W_TROYThu Mar 10 1994 11:4416
    Well the Big East made its selections of new members yesterday:
    
    In: Rutgers and West Virginia (Will be in A10 one last year)
    Not Selected:  Temple and Virginia Tech
    (Temple is VERY disappointed)
    
    UCONN and Villanova have until 1998 to agree on becoming 1A level in
    football - 2002 to implement this.
    
    Globe reports that Xavier is a likely addition to A10 - plus possibly
    Lasalle. I think A10 is going to be competing with Great Midwest for
    other teams. 
    
    re: .694 Good point on Weiler - hardly Mr. Dominant at center.  
    
    Umass 3 point favorite at tonight for A10 final.    
77.696potential a10 teamsWMOIS::BALL_KThu Mar 10 1994 12:3614
    another school the A-10 should consider is Manhattan. not much winning
    tradition there, but they are a program clearly on the rise, and it
    would give the conference a presence in NYC. (which they will lose with
    the departure of Rutgers).  Both Lasalle and Xavier
    are good chioces, but in the case of Lasalle, I don't think you need
    another team in Phili.
    Also as an Alum. I would like to throw Buffalo into the ring.  Sure
    they have no tradition and probably still haven't beatin a Div 1 team
    yet,  but its a 25000-30000 person school with a new 10000 seat arena in a
    sports rich town... tons of potential, and in another year or they
    might almost be competitive.
    
    						KB
    						
77.697A-10 stays strong, Big East basketball suffersTNPUBS::NAZZAROGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!!!!Thu Mar 10 1994 16:0011
    Big East copped out in taking Rutgers over Temple.  Both football
    programs stink, but Temple is of course the premier basketball school
    in the Philly area.  Seems to me this was a sellout to Villanova.
    'Nova will vote with the football schools if they agree to keep Temple
    out of the league.  This is good news for the A-10, and bad news for
    the Big East basketball prgram, as they add two weak sisters who will
    do nothing to enhance their power ratings.  West Virginia has four
    senior starters and nothing left on the bench.  They'll be a doormat
    for years.  Rutgers has always been a doormat.
    
    NAZZ
77.698DZIGN::ROBICHAUDBo$ton PoliceThu Mar 10 1994 17:435
    	Heck if the A10 picks up Xavier like the Globe says they'll
    be a better conference than with the two teams heading over to the
    Big Least.
    
    				/Don
77.699USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Mar 10 1994 20:116
>    Big East copped out in taking Rutgers over Temple.

Agreed.  It definitely looks like Villanova cried, and the rest of the
BE acquiesced.  By taking Temple the BE would have eliminated the A-10
(as a significant b-ball conference).  I wonder what UMass would have
done ???
77.700"We gain by losing I guess"MEMIT::W_TROYThu Mar 10 1994 20:208
    Unless West Virginia and Rutgers have really strong people in the pipe
    now - it DOES sounds like we are better off - although ideally the
    Bonnies would also have gone to the BiG East (:^)
    
    The earlier note on Buffalo was interesting, but have not heard about
    them at all - the manhattan idea also earlier makes sense if they can
    keep the program at a high level.  Not sure they have the mind share to
    really attract a TV audience - but the A10 is very Phil. centric.
77.701Where is Bill Musselman these days?AKOCOA::BREENThu Mar 10 1994 20:585
    Rutgers had a final four team if I'm not mistaken back about '78.  West
    Virginia has allways had a tradition (West,Thorn).
    
    Given big-east money and tv exposure they could recapture some of that
    real fast.
77.702KALVIN::MORGANFri Mar 11 1994 10:2316
    Huge game for the Minutemen, beating Temple 70-59 in the A-10
    tournament champeenship game.  Mike Williams was on fire early and Lou
    Roe had his usual strong game.  Aaron McKie had 33 for Temple.
    
    One thing that bothered me somewhat about this game.  I thought
    Calipari played his top 6 guys a bit too much, causing fatigue and a
    lot of mental errors in the 2nd half.  I know it was the biggest game
    of the year, but I didn't even see Padilla come into the game until
    about halfway through the 2nd half.  At that point Kellogg was nearly
    dead.  I don't mean to complain about a win, but I hope to see a bit
    more rotation during the tournament.
    
    Anyway, this wraps up a great regular season for UMASS.  Can't wait to
    see the seeds this Sunday.
    
    					Steve
77.703UMass not crisp without KelloggOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Fri Mar 11 1994 12:533
    As good as Roe,Camby and williams are without Kellogg,UMass looks lost
    out there. Good win,but the NCAA seedings will tell how meaningful a
    win it was.
77.704No worse than a #2 seedTNPUBS::NAZZAROGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAALLLL - Lalas!!!!!!Fri Mar 11 1994 12:5923
    Sure, this has to be the game that I give up my ticket for!  I had to
    coach my son's 7th grade team lasted night.  We were up 31-9 at one
    point in the first half, 34-20 at the half, and lost the game!  We
    were playing Chelmsford, and they got incredibly hot, and we couldn't
    stop the tidal wave.  
    
    I was afraid the same thing was gonna happen lasted night to UMass, 
    but they really kept their composure well after Temple scored the first 
    11 points of the second half.  A big follow dunk by Camby and an
    incredible alley-oop slam on consecutive possessions sealed the deal
    for UMass.  Lou Roe once again showed that he plays his best in big
    games, as does Michael Williams.
    
    McKie was terrific much of the night, and Jones got hot in the second 
    half, but Derek Kellogg totally dominated Eric Brunson yet again. 
    Brunson has only scored four field goals in three games (no 3-pointers)
    against Kellogg and UMass.  
    
    This team has exceeded all my expectations for this season.  A trip to
    Charlotte, while still somewhat of a long shot, is a lot closer to
    reality today.
    
    NAZZ
77.7051977 or 1978 sounds rightMSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Mar 11 1994 13:155
    Rutgers that year went undefeated and lost in the semis. they then lost
    the consolation game as well.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
77.706MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Mar 11 1994 13:1712
    
      It's beginning too look like as goes Mike Williams so goes
      UMass. And Williams was on last night. A couple of sweet 
      passes to Sweet Lou, Mike had the J going and was driving
      well, just an all-around solid performance. And if Ack Chris
      wants to see a center who can run the floor, because Montross
      can't, check Marcus Camby. Not only can he run the floor but
      he can finish the break, too! And you can stop worrying about
      Lou Roe's game, it's better than Eric's at this point. I'm with 
      Nazz, this team has shown a lot of heart and exceeded all expect-
      ations. Barring a first round loss, everything from here on in 
      is gravy.
77.707RutgersOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Fri Mar 11 1994 13:177
    Actually it was 1975-6. They lost to Michigan in the semis and
    UCLA in the consolation game. The stars were Phil Sellers and Mike
    Dabney,who both went on to NBA careers as well as Hollis Copeland,Ed
    Jordan and "jammin" James Bailey.
    
    Rutgers basketball has been down the past two years,but they have been
    pretty successful over the last 20. Being in the Big East has to help.
77.708MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Mar 11 1994 13:302
    
      Didn't that Rutgers team have Fast Eddie Johnson, too?
77.709SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesFri Mar 11 1994 13:4518
	The reason the BE only took Rutgers and West Virginia to 
expand to 12. Is so that there was balance in terms of Basketball
and Football for voting purposes.

Football			Basketball
--------			----------
Miami				Georgetown
BC				Villanova
West Virginia			Providence
Rutgers				UConn
Syracuse			St. Johns


	There is also Pitt and ?, but anyways if you add Temple. The
vote would be swayed towards the Basketball schools.

Ron
77.710The anti football blocOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Fri Mar 11 1994 14:205
    The other team is Seton Hall which is basketball and one of three to
    vote against the expansion. The Halls' reasons were not wanting to lose
    NJ recruits to Rutgers.
    
    
77.711An eye for an eye?WMOIS::BALL_KFri Mar 11 1994 14:285
    I wonder if there is any chance the A-10 could get any of the 3
    digruntled Big East BB's schools to defect and join them. Probably not,
    but it would be great ,if they could.
    
    							KB 
77.712GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Mar 11 1994 15:2890
         Well, I pulled in the driveway at 1:15 a.m., after a roller
    coaster ride down the ice glazed hills of Rts 202 and 2, returning
    home from UMASS' big win over Temple last night.  Now, 10.5 hours
    later, well fortified with caffeine, but with a hoarse voice and
    eyelids at half staff, here is my game report:
    
         First some stats, from memory, from the post game show:
    
    * UMASS shot 52% from the field to Temple's 37%;
    * UMASS hit over 85% of their free throws;
    * UMASS outrebounded Temple by a margin of 8;
    * Temple turned the ball over 8 times, UMASS 13 times.
    
         Given those numbers, and UMASS' devestating early run, its
    surprising to me Temple made such a close game of it.
    
         I don't believe that UMASS can play any better than they did
    over the first 10 minutes when they built the 18 to 2, and then 21 to 3
    leads.  It was game where I expected Temple to make an early statement,
    but rather it was UMASS that came out of the blocks with fire in their
    belly!
    
         I agree with Nazz that the key to the game was the defensive job that
    Kellogg did on Eric Brunson.  In fact, in all three games, Brunson was
    held well under his 13 ppg average by Kellogg's defense.  Looking ahead
    five years, the Commonwealth's much balleyhooed group of 1991 high
    school point guards will be off doing various things.  Travis Best will
    be pulling in $2-3 M per year in the NBA, Eric Brunson may be hanging
    on in the NBA, or more likely playing in Europe for a nice days wage.
    Derek Kellogg will be teaching high school, or an assistant coach in
    some collegiate program.  He can take some satisfaction in knowing he
    "did more with less", and in the long run might have taken his team to
    greater glories, than either of his more famous in-state rivals.
    
         Given all the hoopla over the John Chaney incident, I was prepared
    for tight security around Chaney, and possibly some ugly chants
    directed towards him.  However the game was really the thing, and the
    fans were on their best behavior.  After the game, both Eddie Jones
    and Aaron McKie must have been surprised at the warm ovations they
    received from the partisan crowd, when they received their
    All-Tournament awards.
    
         Best sign.  A Louis Farrahkan poster, with the headline "Louis
    Farrahkan Speaks".  The "Farrahkan" was crossed out, and "Roe" was 
    inserted in its place.
    
         On the ride out, as the Boston stations faded away, I surfed down
    the dial and came across a Western Mass. or Hartford station with a
    Sports Call-in format.  A caller (a BE fan) was belittling Temple as an 
    opponent, and made the ridiculous comment that Villanova was now playing 
    good ball, and was in fact that best team in Philly.  Well I have news for
    him, Villanova isn't even the second best team in Philly, with Penn
    sitting in the Top 25!  Temple has beaten Kansas, Ala. Birmingham,
    Cincinnati, all of the Philly Big Five, Louisville and GWU twice.
    They've lost to Duke, Ga.Tech and WVU twice, and UMASS three times.
    
         On the subject of the Temple loss to Duke, Eddie Jones had this 
    comment (paraphrased):  "After the UMASS loss in McGonnigle, we
    were not focused, and did not get up for the Duke game.  We had a
    let down.  That was our fault."  Imagine that, playing Duke a let
    down, after playing UMASS!  
    
         Temple might very well benefit from last night's loss, by once
    again drawing somewhere around a #4 Seed in the West Regional.  Their
    stifling match up zone defense could once again take them to the
    Elite Eight, coming out of the West!
    
         I agree with an earlier comment that Calipari might have
    substituted just a bit more, especially in the backcourt, given the 
    work on defensive necessitated by Jones, McKie and Brunson.  Those
    guys just continually run their defensive men in body jarring picks,
    administered by the wide bodies, Cunningham and Battie.  At various
    times I thought Mike Williams gave up some easy shots to McKie, due
    to his fatigue.  Of course, when Calipari went to the freshman Padilla
    in the first half, he was victimized by the Temple D, and committed
    a couple of TO's and quickly went back to the bench.  He did play
    much better in the second half.
    
         Well, I think UMASS played themselves into a second seed, but
    unless UCONN fails to win the BE, and both UNC and Duke fail to win
    the ACC, it will be in a Regional other than the East.
    
    Russ
    
    - oh yeah, Nazz, thanks for your ticket.  My brother enjoyed the 
      game immensely!
                                       
        The A10 All Tournament Team was Derrick Allston - Duquesne, Eddie
    Jones and Aaron McKie - Temple, and Lou Roe and Mike Williams - UMASS.
    Mike Williams received the Tourney MVP Award.
77.713USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Mar 11 1994 16:4818
>    A caller (a BE fan) was belittling Temple as an 
>    opponent, and made the ridiculous comment that Villanova was now playing 
>    good ball, and was in fact that best team in Philly.

Villanova is playing very good ball, and might give Temple all they can
handle.

I haven't seen Temple that much.  The best I saw of them was the road
win over Kansas early in the year.  But they've been pretty bad in their
last 2 games vs. UMass.  Brunson isn't anything like what I've been hearing
(he's actually pretty bad).  And with only 2 players who can score (at one
point last night McKie and Jones had 48 of Temple's 50 pts), they're going
to be in trouble in the NCAA tourney, I don't care how good their zone is.


FWIW, I agree that Williams is the key for UMass.  I wouldn't give him
the "3".  He seems to feed off hitting those.  I'd make him drive all night
and tire him out.
77.714GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Mar 11 1994 16:505
         Oh yeah, in the obscure statistics category, I heard last night
    that Marcus Camby became the fourth freshman in NCAA history to
    register 100 blocked shots in his first year.  Shaq, Alonzo Mourning, and
    Shawn Bradley are the others.  It also should be noted that Camby
    missed over one month of the season due to injury.
77.715AKOCOA::BREENFri Mar 11 1994 17:1210
    Actually I was pretty impressed with Temple.  One guy are liked was
    Barbie.  When Temple goes for rebounds they are immense.  Mass beat a
    very good team last night with big plays and a fast start.
    
    Temple started to dominate the boards in the second half but couldn't
    get any outside scoring other than Jones.
    
    Umass plays best in a fast break style but I'm not sure that Cal'pari
    can stand a fast pace with all of its mistakes too long, watch college
    coach today can?
77.716TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Mar 11 1994 19:4311
    
    >....  It also should be noted that Camby missed over one month of
    >the season due to injury.
    
    	How many games did Camby miss? I recall UMASS' schedule being
    pretty thin back then. I don't think it effected them too much. If
    he had to miss a month, December was a good one to miss....
    
    JimH
    
    
77.717Above Level of the Weaker CompetitionLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Mar 11 1994 20:0115
      One thing that I'm psyched about is that UMass finally DID NOT
      play to the level of their competition when their competition
      was weaker (St Joes/Duquesne).  This improves the probablity
      that they make it past the first two rounds.
    
      They are a shoo-in for #2 and if its in the east, I can't help
      but wonder who the #3 team might be.
    
      My expectations for UMass are two wins in the tourney and a
      good competitive game in the third game.
    
      And should they win a third game...oh wow...to be in a regional
      final!!!
    
                                                    Tony
77.718GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Mar 11 1994 20:049
         Due to his knee injury in the North Carolina game, Camby missed
    the Kansas, Oklahoma, St.Bonaventure, Central Connecticut and Holy
    Cross games.  UMASS' only loss during that time was to Kansas, so
    the team wasn't badly hurt by his absense.  However, Camby probably
    would have put up impressive numbers against St.Bonaventure, C.Ct.
    and Holy Cross, and could well have led the nation in blocked shots
    as a freshman, had he not been injured.
                                                                 
    Russ
77.719"Second seed for the tourney?"MEMIT::W_TROYFri Mar 11 1994 20:4811
    Mr. Williams is the MAN of STEEL out there.  One thing's fer sure, the
    double dose of TV pressure and Tough Opponents has gotten UMASS ready -
    we also must have gotten all the good luck that St. Joe's missed injury
    wise.
    
    Elite Eight at least!! And the team appeared to be a year away -  next
    year they gain Weeks as another Prop 48 Forward.
    
    Way above expectations. 
    
    Can we make a second seed ranking?  
77.720MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Mar 14 1994 13:0413
    
      I ain't as sure that UMass is going to the Elite 8. Not with
     Michigan standing in the way. The Minutemen could beat Michigan
     but they'd have to play at the level of that last game against
     Temple. Anything less probably wouldn't be good enough. Then 
     again Michigan isn't the steadiest team, either and they may have
     trouble getting past Texas but they should. When Michigan is 
     clicking they're as good or better tha anybody. I hope it does 
     come to UMass vs. Michigan because I'd love to see Camby and 
     Jwan Howard tangle. It'll either be a big learning experience 
     for Camby or his big chance to shine and I think he'll shine. 
     The kid just looks better and better every game and he can rise 
     to the challenge. 
77.721Midwest appears to be the toughest regionalTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass-Temple #4 for NCAA Title!Mon Mar 14 1994 14:168
    I tell you, I'm a lot more afraid of Texas than I am of Michigan.
    Texas has won 18 of their last 19, and is one of the very few teams in
    the nation as quick as UMass.  Also, if Texas beats Michigan, their
    game with UMass will be in Dallas, a big advantage for Texas.  Then if
    UMass gets past that game, Arkansas will be waiting.  This is one tough
    draw!
    
    NAZZ
77.722Dang Wolves..ROCK::MURPHYLoosiersMon Mar 14 1994 14:188
    Nazz, you are in wonderland. Texas even lost to Illinois, not
    an easy feat this year. Michigan is just waiting to turn it on
    in the tourney. I think they can, and will, win it all.
    
    8-(
    
    Murph
    
77.723METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Mar 14 1994 15:424
Anyways, SouthEast looks to be the toughest. East and Midwest are decent;
West is real pathetic. I wonder how UNC didn't end up in the West.

The Crazy Met
77.724YawnWREATH::SCOPAMon Mar 14 1994 17:087
    >>>>>>>West is real pathetic. 
    
           It looks boring to me. Chalk it up to the Saturday Upsets. I 
           bet UCONN may have ended up #1 out there had they not been
           upset.
    
    Maj
77.725Tough BracketSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Mar 14 1994 18:5214
      I can't fathom why they put Arkansas in the midwest and
      Purdue in the southeast, but I suppose the reason is the
      midwest finals in Dallas.
    
      I think UMass ended up in a very tough bracket.  Four players
      for Michigan have played far in the tournament two years running.
      I have to admit though; St Louis ended slow and they look to be
      an easier challenge than Virginia was last year.  I think UMass
      ought to fare better in the 2nd round.
    
      Then of course its probably Michigan (no offense to Texas) and
      supposing they get past Michigan - the hogs from hell!!!
    
                                                  Tony
77.726MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Mar 14 1994 19:5111
    
      I agree wholeheartedly with coach Cal about this team -
     they're more talented than last year's team and coming
     together like the Jim McCoy/Wil Herndon/Tony Barbey squad
     used to be. Last year, I liked Harper Williams as a scrapper
     but he wasn't the most sensible guy that ever laced on a 
     pair of Nikes. Lou Roe seems to understand his leadership
     role much better than Harper did. And Lou is a better player.
     Anything can happen with this team and alot of it depends
     on Mike Williams. I hope Mike stays at the level he was for
     the A-10 tourney. If he does, UMass could reak havoc.
77.727playing well at the right timeFRETZ::HEISERimpeach the President and her husbandMon Mar 14 1994 19:531
    I picked them to go to the Final 4.  
77.728can't count them out...SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Tue Mar 15 1994 00:293
    they should definetly surprize sum peeple...
    
               stig
77.729"UMASS-UNC prediction for final"MEMIT::W_TROYThu Mar 17 1994 12:2012
    UMASS is listed as a 13 point favorite in one paper.  Their track
    record for beating the spread is not good.  Let's hope Calipari has the
    team focused on each game - he mentioned yesterday that he had let the
    team lose focus for 3 days prior to the UPENN game last year and 
    they really lostmomentum - these games were held in Syracuse, while tis
    year they are in Wichita KS.
     
    Last night on WEEI Radio in Boston - one of the College BBALL
    newsletter mavens from Florida is picking a UMASS-UNC final, with UNC
    obtaining revenge.  
    
    
77.730what time is the game today?WMOIS::BALL_KThu Mar 17 1994 12:211
    
77.731TNPUBS::ALVEYThe sky's ablaze with ladies' legsThu Mar 17 1994 12:491
1500 EST
77.732MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 17 1994 14:1511
        Ten years ago, you could never have imagined that someone
        would be saying this about Our State U.
    

       "The only difference between us and UMass is that they're 
        used to all the attention with ESPN and all, and we're
        not."

                    -Russel Ponds, SW Texas State guard
    
77.733GiddyapCTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Thu Mar 17 1994 14:285
    Yea and the only diff after the game will be that 'ol Russel
    will be taking the early stagecoach back to Waco...
    
    MikeL
    
77.734Good Article In The HeraldSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Mar 17 1994 15:2829
      That UMass article that mentioned Calipari letting up too
      much last year was from the Boston Herald and I thought it
      was the better Boston UMass article today.  This article
      mentioned about how shortly before the first Temple game,
      Calipari said something to the effect: "This is your team"
      to the three juniors Roe, Williams, and Kellog.  The tone
      of the article throughout was of a situation where to some
      extent the coach set himself to the side and allowed the
      three juniors to be the 'leaders'.
    
      Excellent article and superb choice by Calipari.  The guy
      is definitely a coach.  One of the last things in the article
      was about Calipari looking toward the non-juniors and asking
      them if he indeed did as he said (hand over leadership to the
      juniors) and they replied approvingly in the affirmative.  The
      tone of the article was that Calipari did something that has
      panned out to be VERY positive to the team and that the players
      have moved up at least a notch in the areas of dedication/
      motivation.
    
      I'm the type of person who is irrationally pessimistic when
      prognosticating about a team that I really like, but all rational
      thought tells me that this team ought to win convincingly in 
      the first two rounds and give the 3rd round opponent (most likely
      Michigan) a really good game.
    
      I highly recommend today's Herald article.
    
                                                 Tony
77.735I Picked UNC Over UMass TooSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Mar 17 1994 16:0311
      re: .729
    
      In one of two 'friendly' pools, I picked UNC over UMass in the
      finals as well.  In the one other I played, I picked UConn over
      Arkansas.
    
      To be honest though, I think its good to stretch a little here
      and there.  I can't see anyone honestly preferring UMass to
      Arkansas in Dallas.  That makes no sense to me whatsoever.
    
                                                Tony
77.736MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 17 1994 16:1514
    
      "The better Boston article" has a nice ring to it. And it's
     reinforces (for me) what I said earlier this year when UMass fans
     were griping about the lack of media coverage the Minute-
     men were getting. Back when football, basketball and hockey
     were all in full swing. The Minutemen don't have much comp 
     for the front page of the sports section now and that's where 
     they have been for most of the last two weeks. No argument that 
     Boston isn't the kind of college b-ball town that Lexington, Ky
     or even Providence, RI is, but they will and have embrace(d) this
     team and the affection will only deepen the further they go in
     the tourney. It's a team and a coach with a lot of personality
     and they're easy to love. I hope they kick off with a big bang
     today.
77.737DYPSS1::ROPERTake a Sad Song and Make it BetterThu Mar 17 1994 18:4020
      <<< Note 77.735 by STRATA::BARBIERI "God can be so appreciated!" >>>
                        -< I Picked UNC Over UMass Too >-

>>      I can't see anyone honestly preferring UMass to
>>      Arkansas in Dallas.  That makes no sense to me whatsoever.
    
>>                                                Tony
    
    Tony, UMass over Arkansas would make perfect sense to you if you'd seen
    the Kentucky-Arkansas game last Saturday.  Kentucky 90-Arkansas 78. 
    The key to beating Arkansas is to limit their run-outs and having good
    shot selection offensively.  The Hogs had no more than 5 fast-break
    opportunities against UK the entire game!  UK didn't press Arkansas so
    that they wouldn't have a chance to run up and down the floor.  UK also
    had incredible shot selection.  On defense UK played a trapping 2-3
    zone that gave Arkansas fits.  I think UMass has an excellent chance in
    a game against Arkansas.
    
    - Rope
    
77.738Hope SoLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Mar 17 1994 18:449
      re -1
    
      Wow...I hope you're right!  (Sounds pretty good to me.)
    
      Well, it looks like the UMass/SW Texas winner will be playing
      Maryland instead of St Louis.  I heard that the Billikens lost
      to the Terps.
    
                                             Tony
77.739METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 17 1994 18:596
no surprise in the St. Louis/Maryland game. St. Louis was seeded higher,
but Maryland's advantage was playing all season in a much tougher
conference.

The Crazy Met

77.740Not confident in UMassSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOFri Mar 18 1994 11:2213
Managed to see the last half of the game yesterday.  UMass, though 
wining by 15+, didn't look terribly impressive.  In fact, they looked
completely befuddled for most of the 2nd half when Texas threw a great
1-3-1 zone at them.  They were shooting from the outside rather than the 
inside, and couldn't connect for nothing.  A big UMasslead (near 20) got down
to 4 or 6 points at one point.  If Texas had any great talent, and/or  
more experience at the dance, they may have been able to covert the game.

With about 7 minutes left, looked like Lou got P.O.'d and took control of the
the UMass team, and started break the zone single handedly.  However, it makes
one leary for later in the tourney for UMass.

t
77.741Terrapin StationSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Mar 18 1994 12:0021
      Yeah, I heard the early second half on the radio.  It didn't
      sound impressive.  Meanwhile, hats off to St Louis.  From the
      way  the article read, they just didn't have the height to
      contain Joe Smith and he was unconscious.  They were within 
      4 very late in the game.  I don't think they choked or
      anything.
    
      I graduated from UMass, but grew up in Wisconsin.  Good to see
      UW-Green Bay take California!!  (unbelievable).  Also good to
      see the Badgers take Cinci.
    
      Back to UMass...I'm  scared of Maryland because of Joe Smith.
    
      By the way...Michigan was extremely lucky to escape.  Pepperdine
      resorted to some real boneheaded offense in its last possession
      in regulation with the score tied (have a 5'9"  sharpshooter 
      dribble the ball and then get his shot blocked easily).  I think
      they'd have fared better with crisp passing (so far as getting a
      decent shot is concerned).
                                
                                                Tony
77.742"On to Maryland"MEMIT::W_TROYFri Mar 18 1994 12:3614
    Well, I can remember 6-10 games UMASS has played this year where there
    was real concern on losing (GW, Temple, UNC among others) -  but the
    thing the papers picked up on was that SWT had quite a few inside
    blocks.  They did not pick up on how much harrassment UMASS gave SWT as
    needed - each time SWT lost ground.
    
    They played at 80% of capacity and still won going away.
    
    Maryland's game will be a Temple like tong war for revenge after they 
    were pretty well handled by UMASS on ESPN.  The Maryland coach was not
    amused after that game - and barely credited UMASS.  The mental
    toughness "Refuse to Lose" mentality will be critical for this one.
    
    UMASS by 3.
77.743GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Mar 18 1994 13:4421
         I took yesterday p.m. as vacation time, and watched the game
    live.  UMASS committed 19 turnovers, and Camby (awful game), Padilla,
    Kellogg and Roe, played poor games on the offensive end.  As usual
    the defense was outstanding.
    
         As I told Nazz offline before the Tourney started, I am more
    concerned about the second round matchup against Maryland, than I
    am about the Sweet 16 matchup versus either Michigan or Texas.
    I was surprised to read that UMASS' victory in Springfield against
    the Terps was their most one-sided loss (14 pts.) of the year.  So
    there is no question that Maryland will be motivated.  Luckily, for
    UMASS, Maryland is already woofing it up and talking so serious trash,
    so the motivation for UMASS should be there as well.  Calipari's
    criticism of the team yesterday was that they young players were
    nervous and that the team overall didn't play with enough emotion.
    Let's hope the Refuse to Lose mentality returns on Saturday!
    
    Russ
    
    - lest anyone think I hopped a flight to Wichita, when I say I watched
      it live, I meant from the comfort of my family room on CBS!;^)!!
77.744ANd go on to face Texas in DallasTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass-Temple #4 for NCAA Title!Fri Mar 18 1994 14:2217
    As much as I was disappointed with Camby's performance, I am much more
    concerned about the play of the point guards.  Neither Kellogg nor
    Padilla were asasertive offensively, and they are going to have to
    really take control of the offense against Maryland.
    
    Having seen Maryland about a half dozen times this year, it's going to
    be critical for the UMass PG to handle the trapping pressure from the
    Terps.  Pushing the ball to the forwards and having them create fast
    break opportunities could wear down Maryland, a team that is not deep
    at all.  Williams subs a lot, but the bench guys get sporadic minutes.
    Their entire offense revolves around Simpkins getting the ball low to
    Smith, and having their perimeter players (Hipp and Booth, mainly)
    slash to the hoop.  I think UMass is athletic enough to contain
    Maryland on the offensive end.  If they can limit their turnovers,
    UMass should win by 7 or 8.
    
    NAZZ
77.745"Needed that killer instinct"MEMIT::W_TROYMon Mar 21 1994 11:5719
    Well, I think that Nazz correctly sized up the game.  The Maryland
    pressure cost UMASS heavily in some turnovers, lots of rushed shots,
    and one of the ugliest 4 minutes of basketball I've seen in some time,
    following the 10 point UMASS lead in the second half. It really seemed
    that UMASS expected Maryland to roll over and die after going up by 10.    
    
    There is enough blame to go around - but clearly the guard play,
    including Mike Williams - really hurt.  The bright note was the 
    emergence of Marcus Camby as an offensive force.  IF he couples his
    defensive performance with increased offensive production - watchout
    baybee!!!!
    
    For Schnozz anti-fans there is the consolation that 2 New England teams
    beat those 'Heels this year - bookending their season (almost).
    
    
    Stepping back a moment - this team essentially overacheived with the
    number of new players this year - they were not picked higher than 3rd
    in most pre-seasob polls for the A10.  But their 
77.746Summary: UnderachievementSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Mar 21 1994 12:0840
      What a bummer...when the tailor suits UMass with attire reflecting
      their tournament performance, the most apparent characteristic is
      _underachiever_.  That's just the way it is.
    
      I don't think we can blame youth either.  Maryland started 3
      sophomores and two freshman.  In other words, they are a lot younger.
    
      I am very disappointed.  My biggest concern was that they wouldn't
      underachieve.  I was hoping for two wins followed by a solid per-
      formance (win or lose) against Michigan (though we know it could have
      easily been Pepperdine or Texas!!).
    
      I just wanted them to have more to build on.  I just don't see
      winning what was actually a closer game than the score indicates
      to a #15 seed and losing to a #10 seed much of anything to build
      on.
    
      I hope Calipari gets himself some guards.  Perimeter shooting is
      just plain too uncertain.
    
      In looking for silver linings...
    
      Camby - boy, do we have a lot to look forward to!  The sky is the 
      limit with this guy.
    
      the guards - I read that Kellog was real sick, Williams had a stomach
      problem too.  Hey, no excuses, but if they really were hurting bad,
      that is a lot to overcome.  Maybe this made it that much harder to
      challenge the threes.  And Padilla just wasn't there.  No guard
      support.
    
      the last 5 minutes - UMass scrapped and scraped.  Their effort in
      that time span was really good.  (Too bad Kellog didn't intercept
      that pass - it could have made it interesting.)
    
      Man, I was really looking forward to a UMass Michigan matchup!
    
      Well, at least ACC Chris won't be giving us too hard a time!!
    
                                                     Tony
77.747One good thing from the loss: Camby > Joe SmithTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Mon Mar 21 1994 14:3324
    It was too bad that the flu rolled through the team at this time, but
    you can't use Kellogg's throwing up behind the bench during the second
    half (ugh!) as an excuse.  There were several things that really hurt
    UMass.
    
    1) The revenge factor - all the motivation was with Maryland.
    
    2) The lack of senior leadership.
    
    3) The game's tidal wave effect.  Once Maryland got the momentum AND
    the lead, UMass could do nothing to stem the tide.  That ties into
    senior leadership.  UMass looked lost once Maryland took control
    of the game.
    
    4) Lack of outside shooting.  Why Carmelo Travieso is in Coach Cal's
    doghouse I don't know, but the lack of an outside shooter was sorely
    missed Saturday, and he is their best outside shooter.
    
    I admit to being stunned and disappointed on Saturday.  But I am
    already looking forward to nexted season, when UMass should be one of
    the top five teams in the nation in the preseason polls, and open up
    with Arkansas in the tipoff classic in Springfield.
    
    NAZZ
77.748GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Mar 21 1994 17:2931
         I lived through basketball hell this weekend, and it's not a pretty
    place!  The UMASS stinker on Saturday, next I was at the Gahden for the
    abysmal Celtics and Hawks yesterday, and then I get out to the car and 
    listen to the BC Eagles upsetting the No.1, Carolina Tarheels.  On top of
    that, the Eastern Mass. teams dominated the Central-West champions at
    the high school level.
    
         Back to UMASS.  If anyone had told me that UMASS would outrebound
    the Terps, have fewer turnovers, that Camby would neutralize Joe Smith,
    that UMASS would shoot 50% from the field, and that one of the Terps
    key players would have 4 fouls at the half, I think I would have been
    inclined to have bet the house on the Minutemen!  But even if UMASS
    played a decent game according to the stat sheet, the game itself was
    clearly a knockout punch.
    
         Obviously, when guys like Smith and Mario Lucas are out on the
    perimeter knocking down treys, well, it can be said their Maryland team
    is in a bit of an unconscience "zone".  By the same token, when a UMASS
    team that has been known for their defense all season long, gives up
    95 points, and 57 in the second half alone, well, there is something
    seriously wrong with the way they are playing defense.
    
         After two years of early exits at the hands of mid-level ACC
    teams, UMASS now deserves to be lumped in with the underachieving
    Arizona's and recent vintage UCLA's.  No matter how impressive their
    regular season might have been, as a National program, they have to
    get it done in the NCAA's, and they have come up woefully short! 
    
    Russ
    
    - go UCONN!!
77.749Disappointing loss, yes; underachieving team, noTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Mon Mar 21 1994 18:2015
    Whoa, Russ - hold on there!  This UMass team has NO seniors on
    scholarship.  Four of their first eight players are in their first
    year with the program.  That they have achieved so much so soon is a
    tribute to them and Coach Cal.  You agreed with me in November that
    getting 17-18 wins this year against that tough schedule would be a
    major accomplishment.  UMass went 27-7, beat North Carolina, won its
    third straight A-10 regular season and conference titles, beat Temple
    three times (first time that has ever happened to the Owls in one
    season) and provided us with a wonderful winter of thrills.
    
    I am disappointed over the loss to Maryland, but occasionally those
    things happen.  I am already excited about next year.  Just eight more
    months until the UMass-Arkansas game!
    
    NAZZ
77.750just a theoryWMOIS::BALL_KMon Mar 21 1994 18:3915
    I'd like to advance another THEORY on their early demise the last 2
    year. It seems to me that many of the big wins in the regular season have
    been aided more by the fact that UMASS has been able to raise their
    emotional/intensity to a higher level than their opponents, than any
    great superiority in talent (the N.C. game is a obvious example). While
    I'm certainly not implying a lack of talent, I'm saying that their
    talent (by itself) is not overwhelming. But they make the most of it
    because of the character of players (all 3 jnrs are great examples) 
    and coach cal's motivational skills. 
    	....Anyway, the point being that in the NCAA's, everybody is super
    motivated (not counting those who choke on it) so intensity is no
    longer an competitve advantage...and maybe they aren't any more talented
    than Maryland.  Not that that's a bad thing
    
    						KB
77.751Re: .749GIAMEM::SCHOTTMon Mar 21 1994 19:3216
         Sure Nazz, back in November I thought UMASS would struggle to win
    18 or 19 games and finish 3rd or so in the A10.  However it soon became
    apparent that even with their youth, they were a better team than that.
    Their record, their non-conference wins, the A10 League Championship,
    and their power ratings all came together and they were annointed as
    one of the top 10 teams in the country.  The Selection Committee took
    all of this into consideration and made them a number two seed.
    
         Given two early exits in consecutive years, when seeded as a 
    #2 and a #3 seed, and also considering that the two NCAA losses were
    among the most one sided, non-competitive losses during the two
    seasons, causes me to wonder what's going on.  Why can they get up
    for Temple in the League Championship, and then look so flat and out
    of sync in the more important tourney?
    
    Russ
77.752My ConcernsSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Mar 22 1994 12:2757
      I was unable to watch all but the last five minutes of the game
      last Saturday, but I devoured as much as I could on it.  I kind
      of have mixed feelings.
    
      Is it possible that Maryland was in a 'zone' that had little to
      do with the defense they faced and (given that) they were unstoppable?
      I mean...look at BC...people said they killed NC with the threes
      yet I'm pretty sure they shot under 50%.  Maryland shot 80%!!!  What
      does a defense do?  My friend told me that in the last 16 or so
      minutes of the game, Maryland looked like they were shooting more 
      like 90%.  I mean...what do you do?  You've got a load in Joe Smith
      underneath and you probably can't fill up the inside because the
      team is unconscious with its shooting.  A good example is Kentucky.
      Here's a fine team that lives by threes, missed more than its usual
      and gets bounced.
    
      So, I wonder how much of it is just plain UMass going against an
      unconscious team.
    
      Still, when Roe says something to the effect that they didn't have
      the fire...WHAT IS GOING ON???  How do you not have the fire??!!
    
      My hope for UMass was to win the first two games fairly handily
      and to give the 3rd opponent a good game.  So my hope wasn't even
      counting on them to beat a lower seed!  I just wanted them to have
      something to better prepare them for the team next year.  Instead,
      what do they have?  A closer game than the score would indicate win 
      against Southwestern Texas and a loss to (as Russ put it) a merely
      good ACC team that is by the way YOUNGER than UMass.
    
      The following are my concerns...
    
      Psychological factor.  To some extent, the team is labeled.  They
      have underachieved two years running in the tournament.  Can they
      overcome this next year?
    
      The Atlantic 10.  Temple loses Jones and Mckie.  They didn't seem 
      to have anything else.  Who is there besides GWU?  Are there enough
      nonconference games to make them tournament tough?  (If I were them,
      I'd ask to play in the great midwest.)
    
      Recruiting.  Could this underachieving impact recruiting?  (I really
      don't know.)
    
      Who knows?  Maybe noone would have beaten Maryland on that given day.
      Having missed so much of the game, I really don't know if the problem
      was defense or if the defense didn't matter or some combination.
    
      Anyway, I've got high hopes for next year, I'm just concerned about
      the psychological factor.
    
      Oh...one other thing.  I really wish the team could learn how to
      shoot.  I still think there's something fundamentally wrong here. 
      I'd like to see perimeter shooting be more consistently good.
    
                                                        Tony
    
77.753DYPSS1::ROPERTake a Sad Song and Make it BetterTue Mar 22 1994 16:0433
>>      A good example is Kentucky.
>>      Here's a fine team that lives by threes, missed more than its usual
>>      and gets bounced.
    
    That's not quite an accurate statement IMO.  UK tried the entire
    1st-half of the Marquette game to take the ball inside.  They were not
    successful.  Fact is, Pitino hasn't had the talent yet at UK for a
    strong inside game.  I believe that trend will start to change with the
    additions next year.
    
    Pitino's philosophy on the three is that it is a GOOD shot under 2
    conditions.
    
    	1.  If upon taking the ball inside, the post man is doubled, you 
            kick the ball outside for hopefully an open three.
    
        2.  If the post man grabs a rebound and is covered it's a great
            opportunity to kick it out for an open three.
    
    Pitino doesn't believe in taking an intermediate jumper when you can
    step back 2-3 feet and get an extra point.  The three is only effective
    for UK when they can take the ball inside to out.  That's why the
    Marquette game was so difficult.  Kentucky was never able to work the
    ball inside effectively.  UK was out weighed by an average of 30 pounds
    or so across the front-line.  Never mind the height differential!
    
    This year and last Kentucky started playing a much stronger low-post
    game because the talent is getting better.  It's not where it needs to
    be yet, but it'll improve.  The addition of 6'11 240 lb Mark Pope, a
    transfer from Washington, should help next year.
    
    - Rope
    
77.754Kentucky/UMass RecruitingSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Mar 22 1994 17:1221
      Rope,
    
        I hear ya.
    
        I hadn't seen a single Kentucky game and just went by the 
        stat, but I see your point.  Kentucky was unable to get the
        kind of three they needed in order to have much of a chance
        of winning and so the actual 3 point field goal statistics
        can be misleading.
    
        I wish I could have seen more of the UMass game and decided
        for myself if the threes Maryland got were due to lax defense
        or if they were just in a zone.
    
        On another completely different topic...how does the recruiting
        look for UMass???
                                                     
        How is Weeks (prop 48) supposed to be?  Who are they looking at
        in high school?  Any letters of intent?
    
                                                     Tony
77.755Give Maryland credit,but UMass went flat for a long stretchNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 22 1994 17:2420
>       I wish I could have seen more of the UMass game and decided
>       for myself if the threes Maryland got were due to lax defense
>       or if they were just in a zone.
    
    I thought that Maryland indeed was "in a zone" and unconscious with
    their shooting for most of the second half, but in some part because
    UMass did nothing *on offense* to break that rhythm and momentum as 
    the Maryland steamroller fed on itself (if that makes any sense).  
    Seriously, there was a long period of the first 10 minutes of the
    second half where UMass was dead, confused, and out of sync not mainly 
    on defense but on offense, and this is where the player comments about 
    missing "the fire" come in.  I think matching baskets (or coming close 
    to matching) during such a run is a big part of eventually stopping it.
    This game went from a healthy UMass lead to an even healthier Maryland
    lead in a very short period of time, because UMass had problems on the
    offensive end.
    
    glenn
     
77.756GIAMEM::SCHOTTTue Mar 22 1994 19:5337
         Glenn is exactly correct in his statement that UMASS'
    confusion on offense directly contributed to the overwhelming
    Maryland run in the second half.  I believe that UMASS lack of
    cohesion on the offensive end affected their ability to turn
    around and play tough defense on the other end.  But even if UMASS' usual
    defensive intensity wasn't there, Maryland still made the shots.
    When you stop to think that most college basketball teams struggle
    to convert 70% of their free throws, then Maryland's shooting
    percentage becomes all the more impressive.
    
         I think I was more disappointed with how UMASS reacted to
    Maryland's trapping defense.  Usually they were able to avoid the first
    trap just over midcourt, but often made the first pass out to either
    Bright or Dingle, who then succeeded in getting trapped along the side
    lines.  I would much rather have seen the guards push the ball toward
    the key, and thus put pressure on Maryland's inside defenders, then
    to pass off to the small forwards at the perimeter.  It was the first
    time all year that I recall UMASS being bothered by a pressure defense.
    Maryland's defense only forced 11 UMASS turnovers, but it clearly
    took the offense right out of the game at a crucial time .... just
    when Maryland's offense was clicking at the other end!
    
         Regarding recruiting, Tyrone Weeks is a wide body forward,
    somewhat along the lines of BC's Danya Abrams.  He is supposed to be
    a very tough rebounder and have a decent inside game within 15 feet
    of the basket, on the offensive end.  UMASS lost out on their number
    one recruiting objective for 1994, when Danny Fortson, a Pittsburg
    area high schooler, ranked by most observers as one of the top 10
    high school basketball players in the U.S., committed to Cincinnati
    in November.  The other high schoolers that I have heard they are
    looking at are Kendrick Moore, a point guard and Marcus Camby's
    teammate from Hartford, Ct.; Melvin Watson, a 6'3" PG/2G from the
    Winchendon (Ma.) School; and Inus Norville, a 6'10" C/PF from
    Virginia.
    
    Russ
                                                   
77.757DYPSS1::ROPERTake a Sad Song and Make it BetterTue Mar 22 1994 22:289
    Speaking of Fortson, Cincinnati will be a dominant team in the next
    couple of years.  Joining the Bearcats next year will be Fortson, Bobby
    Brannen, a 6'8 Center who just this week was named Ohio Boys Player of
    the Year, and Keith LaGree formerly of Louisville.  Add these to
    players like Dontonio Wingfield, Damon Flint and Keith Gregor, and you
    have an explosive lineup.  I look for Cincy to be a serious title
    contender in 2 years.
    
    - Rope
77.758I blame the Big EastWMOIS::BALL_KWed Mar 23 1994 11:4813
    re .756 recruiting
    
    It wouldn't surprise me if they have a weak year recruiting.  What with
    all the crap the Big East dragged their conference through this year.
    If I were a recruit, I'd be leary of going to a team whose confernce
    might dissolve.  I expect all the a10 recruiting to be somewhat
    damaged.
    Fortunately for UMASS, with no scholarship seniors they don't need a
    lot (for next year anyway).  Question: With Weeks joining, and Nunez
    getting a scholarship, they can't have more than one scholarship
    available, can they ? Does anybody know ? 
    
    					KB 
77.759UMass In John Wooden Tribute On Dec. 3LUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Mar 23 1994 11:5539
      Just read in this morning's Globe that UMass will play Kansas
      on Dec. 3 in one game of a doubleheader in Anaheim.  The event 
      is a tribute to John Wooden and there will be ample time between
      the two games in which the tribute will take place.  (In the
      other game, UCLA plays Kentucky.)
    
      The paper mentioned how this will help recruiting.  I guess I
      don't know when the 'ripe' time is as far as recruiting is concerned.
      But, if its around that time frame, UMass could be HOT.  They will
      have just come of an early season nationally televised game against
      Arkansas and then on to this contest against Kansas.
    
      And I gotta believe...if any high school coach has any brains, he'll
      tell his players to catch John Wooden; icon and motivator that he is.
    
      What an event for UMass to participate in!!!!
    
      If the fall is the riper time for recruiting, UMass could benefit more
      from good efforts in these two games than from one (or even two) more
      wins in this tourney.  Well...maybe that's a stretch.
    
      Good to hear about the recruiting concentration on guards.  Just get
      UMass Kenny Anderson and they'll be fine!!  ;-)  (so wouldn't anybody?)
    
      Speaking of Fortson...that was a drag.  Having grown up in Milwaukee,
      my choices for Fortson (when he was down to three teams) were:
      1) UMass, 2)Marquette, and 3)Cinci.  So he takes my third choice!!
    
      Yeah, Cincinnatti ought to be AWESOME in two years.  If its possible,
      I think the Bearcats play even more tenacious on defense than UMass
      does.
    
      This is a drag...my favorite thing in sports is UMass basketball and
      now its a long, long wait.  (Well, maybe Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl
      was bigger for me.)
    
                                                     Oh Well,
    
                                                     Tony
77.760A10 Is WeakLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Wed Mar 23 1994 12:0018
      re: .758
    
      I know it might sound extreme, but I would seriously negotiate to
      go into the great midwest.  Look who's in there:
    
      Marquette
      Cincinnatti
      St Louis
      Memphis State
      De Paul(?)
    
      This is a small conference.  Look at the average talent level of
      these teams!!!  Even the teams that didn't make the tourney are
      usually tough.  There's no time like the present.  Get out of the
      A10!  Get in the great midwest!
    
                                                     Tony
    
77.761re .760WMOIS::BALL_KWed Mar 23 1994 12:218
    I cautiously agree. The GMW looks like an up and coming conference.  
    But it also needs some stability.  Depaul (and maybe Marquette ?)
    were among those mentioned to join the "expanded 14 team Big East"... 
    (Do other confernces see it as easy picking to take teams from?). If
    Notre Dame would join it then I would feel better about its stability.
    By the way, I believe Dayton is also in that confernce           
    
    							KB
77.762A-10 will be back to ten teams for 1995-96 seasonTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Wed Mar 23 1994 13:0233
    Adding Xavier makes the A-10 stable, at least as stable as some of
    these conferences are nowadays.  Here is the latest on potential
    additions to the A-10:
    
    1) Buffalo - School has over 25,000 undergrads, its president is
    interested in going big-time, has an arena in town that seats 16,000.
    But is a longshot. 10-1
    
    2) LaSalle - Desperate to get in, but St. Joe's and Temple don't want
    another member of the Big Five in the league.  Also a longshot.  12-1
    
    3) Northeastern - President of the school looking to hire a big-name
    coach to replace Karl Fogel.  Matthews arena only seats 6,000 but they
    could move some games to the New Shawmut center.  A possibility. 8-1
    
    4) James Madison - An established school with a good basketball
    history.  Has a decent shot.  5-1
    
    5) Richmond - See James Madison; also, could team with JMU as an entry.
    5-1 alone; 6-1 for both teams
    
    6) Louisville - wishful thinking by some UMass alumni.  Virtually no 
    chance.  20-1
    
    7) Manhattan - would give league a presence in NY.  Program is on the
    rise, but may not be prestigious enough.  A possibility.  7-1
    
    8) Siena - Saints have a successful program, lots of rabid fans, and
    are interested.  May have same problem as Manhattan re. prestige.  6-1
    
    9) All other teams (including DePaul and Notre Dame) 15-1
    
    NAZZ
77.763PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 23 1994 15:143
    College kids are already having a tough time with geography.  Why make
    it worse with a bunch of midwesterners playing in the Atlantic
    conference?
77.764TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinWed Mar 23 1994 15:3110
    
    >College kids are already having a tough time with geography.  Why make
    >it worse with a bunch of midwesterners playing in the Atlantic
    >conference?
    
    	Maybe because lasted year most of the Mid-West looked like it was
    in the Atlantic??? :-)
    
    JimH
    
77.765Issn't Cincinnatti too close to the ocean too?CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Mar 23 1994 16:051
    
77.766WKRP::LEETCHU.S. Messaging Practice, CincinnatiWed Mar 23 1994 16:117
77.767MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 24 1994 12:2914
    
        Just when UMass fans and alums thought that they had finally
       stepped out from under BC's shadow, the unthinkable happens.
       BC knocks off the tourney favorite and UMass bows to a lower
       seed. So much for Jim O'Brien being jealous of John Calipari.
       It's O'Brien not Coach Cal on the front of today's sports section.
       So much for the Atlantic 10 being better than the Big East.
       The A-10 got smakced around like they stole something. UMass has 
       a great program with a bright future but their tournament wins
       thus far under Coach Cal aren't really all that impressive. BC, 
       on the other hand, is making the most of their return to the Big 
       Dance and their road is almost limitless from here on in. Another 
       twist of the knife for UMass/Anti-BC fans.
        
77.768CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Mar 24 1994 12:3713
    
    
    Yabbut I just remembered.....
    
    	po' po' Ninj'
    
    
    He's probably dying with the BC adulation going around!
    
    I remain,
    remembering
    Kev
    
77.769Still wishing they'd figure out how good BC-UMass game would beNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Mar 24 1994 12:4415
    I like both teams, probably with a slight preference for BC stemming
    back to the John Bagley days, so I don't get it.  Especially with
    regards to Jim O'Brien.  From just about everything I've read he's a
    hell of a guy (if not a great coach).  He's been to hell and back while
    at BC both personally and professionally, especially personally.  Like
    I said, I don't understand much of the animosity around O'Brien
    (including from BC supporters, other than the fact that that's
    generally business as usual in the big city of Boston).  Then again, 
    I think most of the usual stereotypes concerning both BC and UMass that
    fuel this rivalry are a bunch of garbage, so I can't get into that
    aspect of it.
    
    glenn
    
77.770Separate O'Brien from the BC fools that attacked himTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Thu Mar 24 1994 13:0311
    As a card-carrying UMass whacko (tm), I can honestly say that few of
    us were knocking O'Brien.  He was getting stabbed in the back by his
    own people.  Most of us hate BC on general principles that have
    precious little to do with O'Brien and much more to do with the scum
    that want to string him up one week and turn around and idolize him the
    next.  I must admit there were certain coaches in the past whose sleazy
    practices helped flame the BC hatred (hello, Dr. Tom!), but O'Brien,
    aside from being a lifelong BC guy, is a class person whose mediocre
    game coaching you may question but not his basic decency.
    
    NAZZ
77.771A-10 Not Help UMassLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Thu Mar 24 1994 14:3230
      Yes, it did not go unnoticed that the A-10 was completely
      eliminated by the second round and the Big East has what
      three teams left?  Although one can't be too shocked by
      Temple bowing out to Indiana or GWU to UConn.  It was the
      Minuteman who really stunk up the A-10 (lets face it).
    
      My allegiance is to UMass.  I graduated there and it is the
      good 'ol State U.  I was glad to see BC beat NC, but I really
      can't compare my fondness for BC (not that much) with UMass.
    
      The second round knockout and the competence of the A-10 are
      my concerns.  Temple won't be all that great next year.  I'm
      basing this on their almost complete dependence on McKie and
      Jones.  West Virginia is losing all five starters.  GWU ought
      to be competitive.  But, realistically, what have you got???
      I mean...how can anyone compare the toughness brought on by
      conference play in the A-10 to say the ACC, Big Ten, Big East,
      SEC, or Great Midwest?  Its just not there...not that I can see.
      I'm sure Temple will surface again with a good team, but I don't
      see it next year.  No wonder why these other teams rise to the
      tourney.  Can you imagine playing Duke one day, Wake Forest the
      next, followed by Virginia, Maryland, and Georgia Tech??!
    
      No comparison.  Meanwhile, UMass will face a tough contest with
      GWU and then it will be onto URI, St Bonaventure, St Joes, etc.
      etc.
      
      Big deal!
    
                                                   Tony
77.772And getting worseOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Mar 24 1994 14:582
    And off the early recruiiting signings,it appears the ACC and Big East
    will continue on their high level.
77.773He's still a bum to meWMOIS::BALL_KThu Mar 24 1994 15:1615
    As one of the UMASS fans was WAS anti O'Brien let me just say that I
    view their success as being more "in spite of" Jim O'Brien rather than 
    because of him. In my mind the credit for the victory goes to Curley and 
    the guard trio and NOT O'brien (unless he was the one who ordered the hack
    job by Abrams that put Phelps out of the Game, THAT was great
    strategy). 
    
    As far as the Big East showing it superiority to the A10.  Maybe thats
    why the BE had to go out of its way to try and weaken/breakup the A10
    
    And just because BC finally did something in the post season doesn't
    instantly make O'brien a genious or a saint.. and he's not off the hook
    for that shot he took at Calipari after Selection Day.
    
    						KB 
77.774curious to see th espin ono this one ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Mar 24 1994 15:2617
    
    
    	Yabbut KB,
    
    I'm enjoying this SDUC immensely and would like (since it *IS* payday)
    to part with my $0.02.
    
    Regarding your "in spite of" comment, please tell me how, for the last
    3 years, each and every year, BC's record was better than the prior one
    if it was, as you say, "In spite of" OBrien.
    
    ~/~
    
    I remain,
    a George pot-stirrer wannabee!
    Kev
    
77.775more on J.O'brienWMOIS::BALL_KThu Mar 24 1994 17:386
    My take is that if you build your team for the last 4 years around 4 guys,
    it's only nature to expert them to be better as seniors than as
    freshmen. I suppose if their record got worse I'd REALLY have a case.
    but the question is, given the expectations that came when Curley and
    the rest joined, are didn't you expect more ?
    							KB
77.776"BC eats its own"MEMIT::W_TROYThu Mar 24 1994 20:5329
    A few comments:
    
    A10 IS a weak sister without adding a DRAW team - Buffalo or 
    Northeastern are not it. What happend to the ND going to a conference
    talk?  
    
    A10 is weakened further without a commissioner.
    
    Tv game December 3rd is great - but I would rather see UMASS build to a
    February hot streak, lose the A10, then move on into the NCAA. Do we
    peak too soon?
    
    BC folks are like Red Sox fans - they eat their own very fast. 
    Incredibly mercurial - and they get what they deserve - aka Coughlin. 
    BC remains a way station to larger programs, but the fans think it is
    the destination. Will UMASS get caught in the same trap - and is UMASS
    more than a way station for Coach Cal?  His stock will be lower until
    he overacheives as he did 2 years ago in the playoffs. 
    
    There is no qeustion in my mind that an old style tournament like the
    Colonial Classic of the late 70's would be a real plus for New England 
    BBALL - UMASS, BC, maybe UCONN, Providence.  But BC will always feel
    like they did with playing UMASS in football - they have more to lose
    than win.  
    
    
    
    
    
77.777Expectations ridiculous for middle-of-the-pack bunch...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Mar 24 1994 20:5923
>    but the question is, given the expectations that came when Curley and
>    the rest joined, are didn't you expect more ?
    
    By that standard, the current post-McCoy/etc. UMass crew is at 0-for-2
    in the expectations department if you include NCAA tournament play.
    Yes, a conference championship plus a third-round NCAA berth is a high
    expectation, but I'm comparing relative to what you feel BC should have
    done.  Personally, I don't understand what most of these BC talkshow 
    call-in yahoos thought these guys were capable of.  The 20-win, 3rd-place 
    Big East finish (and what, 4th, and a near-miss tourney invite last
    year?) looks like it's about right on target to me, with the upset of UNC
    throwing it way over the top.
    
    As for O'Brien's supposed slight of Calapari, I think that's perceived 
    on your part as much as anything.  O'Brien described his feelings about
    the selection event in general, perhaps as opposed to what 80% of the 
    other coaches do, but I didn't pick up on the personal connection.  I 
    didn't read or hear anything about an implied insult either (and these 
    media guys around here have rabbit ears when it comes to stuff like that).
    
    glenn
     
77.778UMass could go 15-1 in A-10 play nexted seasonTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Fri Mar 25 1994 16:319
    The Atlantic 10 nexted season will feature a St. Joe's team that should
    have all their injured players back and will probably be picked no
    worse than third in preseason polls.  GW will definitely be the
    runnerup to UMass in those polls, and Temple still has a stong nucleus
    and had a good recruiting class, so they will probably be ranked 4th.
    URI will be decent, but W. Va and Duquesne will be rebuilding.  The
    Bonnies will be the Bonnies and Rutgers will be Rutgers.
    
    NAZZ
77.779Scum....USCTR1::BARRYFri Mar 25 1994 18:1035
    
    	I haven't been in this note for a long time, but it's comforting to
    know that some things don't change. BC fans are scum for thinking that
    O'Brien can't coach or develop players after an embarrassing rout, but
    who delight in a victory over the defending NCAA champs.....Certainly
    the type of insightful analysis one has grown to expect from UMass alums
    when it comes to BC. Great observation.
    
    I saw O'Brien coach against Holy Cross this year. BC won by @35+. In
    the first half, with BC up by @20, all five starters are in and going
    through the motions. Paul Grant, who will likely be his tallest player
    and only veteran center next year, is riding the pine. In the 2nd half,
    Grant comes in, takes a bad shot, makes a poor pass, and sits down
    again until about 5 minutes left to play. This is not good coaching and
    not good player development.
    
    You have to ask yourself, when you evaluate a coach, if the players are
    getting better because they're better prepared, getting quality
    instruction, or if they simply are getting better becasue they're
    playing more. 
    
    My issue with O'Brien is simple: He is neither a good bench coach nor a
    coach who develops players. Was I happy that he won against Dean Smith?
    Absolutely. I was happy for him, the school, and his players. Should he
    stay? I'm still unconvinced.
    
    Is he a good person? I imagine he is. Would I want my son to play for a
    man with his values? I would. Is he on a par with other NE coaches
    (Calhoun, Calipari, Barnes)?. No, and that's the issue.
    
    There hasn't really been much said about the guy from Northeastern
    (Fogel) who was dumped recently. By all accounts, he was a great guy
    and the NU fans aren't scum for wanting better...
    
    
77.780Any More On The RecruitsSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Mar 25 1994 18:4423
      All right...what's the scoop on the recruits?
    
      Tyrone Weeks...how tall is he?  He's big, huh?  How much does
      he weigh?  How is his shooting?  I take it he's mainly known
      for being a tough rebounder in high school?
    
      Kendrick Moore...PG...how tall?  Any rating on the guy?  
    
      Melvin Watson...being he's from Winchendon, does anyone here
      know anything about him?  
    
      Inus Norville...do they have a good chance for this guy?  Boy,
      right in the center of ACC territory.  Good jumper?
    
      One other thing.  I always got Traveisso and Padilla mixed up.
      Which one went to high school in Springfield and then did up his
      senior year in Puerto Rico?  Where did the other go?  Why is
      Traveiso in Calipari's dog house?  We know next to nothing about
      him.
    
      Just wondering about the new guys coming in.
    
                                                   Tony
77.781TidbitPOCUS::SALTALAMACCHSun Mar 27 1994 01:286
    I have Kendrick Moore signed with Missouri.
    
    I don't believe he's available.
    
    Redmen Phil
               
77.782"Weeks is a wide body"MEMIT::W_TROYMon Mar 28 1994 12:354
    Weeks is listed if I recall correctly as 6'6" 235 pound - I will check
    at home - sounds like the replacement for Row after next year.
    
    
77.783HANNAH::ASHElike sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his livesMon Mar 28 1994 16:103
    When do the teams that were in the A-10 go to the Big East?  Next year?
    Who's replacing them?  Would Siena be an option?
    
77.784One more yearOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Mon Mar 28 1994 16:392
    Rutgers and WVU leave the A10 after the 1994-5 season for the Big
    (L)East.
77.785MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Mon Mar 28 1994 16:503
    Xavier is moving to the Atlantic 10.  I'm not sure of the year.
    
    Mike
77.786Too Bad About Kendrick MooreSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Mon Mar 28 1994 17:3510
      re: .781
    
      Bummer about Kendrick Moore.  A guy located wihin a hundred
      miles of Amherst who played with a talent like Camby (at an
      altogether different position) and he chooses Missouri over
      UMass???!
    
      Bummer.
    
                                                Tony
77.787More bad news for the A10WMOIS::BALL_KTue Mar 29 1994 12:049
    I saw on ESPN that Yinka Dare had declared himself eligible for the NBA
    draft (At least a year too early, I think) but he is one of the markee
    players in the conference. Its quite a blow to GW and the A10.
    
    I wouldn't mind seeing the Celtics take him though, he certainly has more
    potential than any center in the draft this year.  Where do people
    think he'll go ?
    
    		    		 		KB
77.788more on YinkaCSTEAM::FARLEYTue Mar 29 1994 12:3014
    
    
    		Yabbut the report I saw reported that the 7-1, 265lb Yinka
    is, at this stage of his development, more advanced than was Zo or
    Mourning *BUT* everybody knows he's a "project player" since he's only
    had someting like 5-6 years of playing BBall.
    
    		I'm praying that he's drafted *ahead* of Monstross! 
    Wouldn't that be a kicker?    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    yeah, I could see him in Green
    Kev
    
77.789DOCTP::TESSIERTue Mar 29 1994 13:205
If a stiff like Bradley was taken number 2 last year, Dare will go
in the top 3.  He will definitely be the first center taken.  Montross
is in danger of falling out of the lottery at this point.

Ken
77.790Depends who is picking when, but he's a sure lottery pickTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Tue Mar 29 1994 13:335
    I think Dare will be a mid-lottery pick, anywhere from 5 to 9.  I think
    Sacramento or the Celtics would definitely take a chance on him, while
    Philly probably wouldn't.
    
    NAZZ
77.791TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHGotta go running - April's comingTue Mar 29 1994 14:154
Agreed on Dare - mid lottery.  He is still raw, but has made remarkable progress
even since last season.

Wouldn't mind seeing him in green either - cain't teach height.
77.792not yetHBAHBA::HAASxen yen zenTue Mar 29 1994 14:1610
>    is, at this stage of his development, more advanced than was Zo or

Not a chance. At this point in Zo's career he had played international
ball against the world's best, played in the Olympics and was regularly
playing with the big boys.

This is not to say that I doubt Dare's potential but he has a long way to
go to get to Zo.

TTom
77.793CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Mar 29 1994 14:5912
    
    
    	Yabbut TTom,
    
    Good point but I was only reporting what the tee vee guy (don't
    remember who it was) said.  I'm pretty sure that it was during the
    halftime of one of the NIT semifinals (shown on ESPN).
    
    I remain,
    wondering where were ya yesterday?
    Kev
    
77.794on the jobHBAHBA::HAASxen yen zenTue Mar 29 1994 15:179
>    wondering where were ya yesterday?

Way out there in the field. I'm really screwing up at work. I'm getting
paid by customers with cold hard cash and I'm sure this is creating
massive hardships on the bean counters.

I wasn't at the end of the world, but I could see it ...

TTom
77.795CAMONE::WAYValorTue Mar 29 1994 15:2019
>Way out there in the field. I'm really screwing up at work. I'm getting
>paid by customers with cold hard cash and I'm sure this is creating
>massive hardships on the bean counters.

Ttom, that will royally mess up the works.  See, what you have to do
is give them stuff for nothing, and then add some massive discounts on top
of that.  Promise them the world, and deliver it, all at no charge.

You do all of this, you see, to move product.



>I wasn't at the end of the world, but I could see it ...

Whoa, I've been there a few times, but I didn't even have to leave my
house......8^)


'Saw
77.796back, thoughHBAHBA::HAASxen yen zenTue Mar 29 1994 15:258
Fayetteville, NC, dontcha know. Affectionately known as FayetteNam.

I tried to give all this stuff away but they insisted on paying for it.
Actually, business is booming down this way for some unknown reason.

Anybody who pays me for something obviously knows less than I do ;-).

TTom
77.797Could Dare Go Higher?STRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Tue Mar 29 1994 15:457
      Boy, being a Bucks fan and looking at where they sit in the
      draft, this is a dilemma!
    
      How high should Dare go?  How many legitemate centers do teams
      ever have a chance at???
    
      I'd almost consider taking him no matter what!
77.798I love speculationWMOIS::BALL_KTue Mar 29 1994 16:1114
    I think the first four picks are Robinson, Hill, Kidd and Marshall (in that
    order IMO). While Dare could slide in there because of the value and 
    rarety of big men, it'll be tough to pass on those four because
    they're pretty much "sure things". After that, unless you've got a
    Shaq/Akeem/Alonzo in your lineup already it'll be VERY tough to pass on
    Dare because of the lack of Centers.
    
    Perhaps the complication is that the freshmen class this year is
    apparently a bumper crop of centers (Griffith,Wallace, Robinson, Camby),
    none of which is likely to last to his senior year
    the question is will teams take the "sure things" and wait, or take a
    chance on a POTENTIALLY dominating center now if given the chance
    
    		      				KB
77.799Zo - destine to be the bestCNTROL::CHILDSDean's gone fishin'Tue Mar 29 1994 16:485
Kev, the reporter must have been drunk or something if he thinks Dare is
ahead of Zo' is/was/or shall be.........

mike
77.800Pete Gillen rumor ?WMOIS::BALL_KWed Mar 30 1994 12:297
    I heard the second half of a report on some radio station that Pete
    Gillen (of new A10 member Xavier) was taking the Providence Job.  Was
    this just a rumor they were talking about or has he taken the job....
    
    or am I completely mistaken (hopefully)
    
    						KB
77.801MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Mar 30 1994 12:5516
>                <<< Note 77.792 by HBAHBA::HAAS "xen yen zen" >>>
>                                  -< not yet >-
>
>>    is, at this stage of his development, more advanced than was Zo or
>
>Not a chance. At this point in Zo's career he had played international
>ball against the world's best, played in the Olympics and was regularly
>playing with the big boys.
>
>This is not to say that I doubt Dare's potential but he has a long way to
>go to get to Zo.
>
>TTom

 Zo had played in the Olympics in his fifth year of playing basketball ?
 I highly doubt it.
77.802dat team had no offense!CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Mar 30 1994 13:1116
    
    
    	Yabbut in regards to Zo *being on* the 'pic team, you don't think
    that the fact that his college coach (and recruiter), John Thompson
    didn't sorta manipulate the 'pic team?  Does "let's make a deal"
    sound familiar?
    
    	Also, blame it on some non-functioning synapsys, but did Zo
    actually *play* in the 'pics or did he just make the team?
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    still not forgiving Thompson for his abysmal 'pic performance
    Kev
    
77.803CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Wed Mar 30 1994 15:075
    Last night Chris Collingsworth said he will probably go, on WLW sports
    talk.  I didn't hear that he did do it.  I heard the WKU coach had the
    job in his pocket and opted for PITT.
    
    _GSH_
77.804He's a good coach, but has a big rebuilding job at PCTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Wed Mar 30 1994 18:055
    Gillen officially took the Providence job this morning.
    
    NAZZ
    
    
77.805housing?HBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaWed Mar 30 1994 18:266
Nazz,

Any word on whether Gillen is going to move into another house that used
to be a Chris Knorr house?

TTom
77.806We're number 5 !!!WMOIS::BALL_KWed Apr 06 1994 14:167
    Dick Vitale gave his Top 5 for next year on sportsCenter last night.
    He had:
    
    1. Arkansas
    2-4  NC,Kentucky, and UCLA,... in some order
    5. UMASS   
            
77.807METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Apr 06 1994 16:224
what about UConn if Marshall stays??

The Crazy Met

77.808CAMONE::WAYThe Old Man and the PCWed Apr 06 1994 16:2710
>what about UConn if Marshall stays??
>
>The Crazy Met

I surely hope he does stay.  He'd be stupid not to, I mean, the way I see
it, his stock is low, and he's got to prove to the world that he doesn't
really have a recurring case of DeanDisease....


'Saw
77.809DOCTP::TESSIERWed Apr 06 1994 17:2112
Actually, the Connecticut papers over the weekend carried several
stories that indicated just the opposite.  NBA scouts and GMs were
quoted as saying that Donyell's stock hadn't gone down at all, that
they base their decisions on the entire season, not three games in
March, and that they still figured him to be about the fifth pick 
if he came out.

If the new collective bargaining agreement, to be negotiated during
the next few months, includes a rookie salary cap, then Donyell will
be making a big mistake by staying for his senior season. 

Ken 
77.810CAMONE::WAYThe Old Man and the PCWed Apr 06 1994 18:1510
>If the new collective bargaining agreement, to be negotiated during
>the next few months, includes a rookie salary cap, then Donyell will
>be making a big mistake by staying for his senior season. 

If that goes through, he's gone.  Definitely.....

If that's the case it'll be a few years before UConn contends again.....


'SAw
77.811TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinWed Apr 06 1994 19:0511
    
    
    	Saw,
    
    		The problem is the new Collective Bargaining agreement
    mostly likely will not be signed until well after the NBA draft and
    the 30-day "Make up you mind" period. Doneyll will have to decide
    without knowing if there will be a rookie cap or not!
    
    JimH
    
77.812CAMONE::WAYThe Old Man and the PCWed Apr 06 1994 19:2012
Oh.

I didn't know that -- I'm certainly not an expert in these things.

I know this -- UConn fans want him to stay, if at all possible, since
with a strong (ie non-choking) Marshall we stand a much better chance
of doing well in the tournament than without him.....

If he goes, oh well, it's gonna be a while....8^)


'Saw
77.813Quick UMass/Ark ComparisonSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Apr 08 1994 18:3422
      I was shocked to find out that Arkansas has all the
      underclassman UMass does.  My estimates on comparison...
    
        Pos'n.         UMass            Arkansas    Preference
      Weak For:     Bright/Dingle        Stewart   prob. UMass
    
      Power For        Roe              Wiliamson    Arkansas
    
      Point            Kellog           Bek(sp?      BIG Ark
    
      other G          Williams       Thurmon/Dillard  Ark
    
      Center           Camby          Wilson/??       UMass
    
    
      Guard play is a big difference the way I see it and as good
      as Roe is, wow is Williamson tough!
    
      By the way, Dontonio Wingate for Cinci declared for the pros
      (only a freshman).
    
                                               Tony
77.814all that and moreHBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaFri Apr 08 1994 18:396
Tony,

Robinson, the starting center is only a sophomore and McDaniel who's
about as fast a player as I've seen will also be back for the hogs. 

TTom
77.815WMOIS::BALL_KFri Apr 08 1994 19:141
    Actually, I'm pretty sure Robinson's a freshmen
77.816and...WMOIS::BALL_KFri Apr 08 1994 19:223
    and I would probably rate the center spot even (at best) from a UMASS
    perspective, if only because they have wilson as a BU and we have Jeff
    Meyer.                                                         
77.817and still moreHBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaFri Apr 08 1994 19:276
>    Actually, I'm pretty sure Robinson's a freshmen

I meant looking forward to nexted season he'll be a sophomore. Also, they
have Rimac, from Croatia, I think, coming back.

TTom
77.818UMass/ArkSTRATA::BARBIERIGod can be so appreciated!Fri Apr 08 1994 19:5511
      Yeah, I forgot which center was the starter.  So Wilson is
      the reserve?  Both of them have been listed as among the
      top center freshman of the year.
    
      What a team!!
    
      I am hopeful that Camby is better what with his last game
      peformance.  Actually, I think he really may be better...so
      mobile.
    
                                                  Tony
77.819and MarylandHBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaFri Apr 08 1994 20:038
I heard someone say that 11 different players started for Arkansas. The
only senior was #31 who didn't play in the tourney.

But if'n you want look at another team that should be good nexted year,
don't forget about Maryland who started 3 sophomores and 2 freshmen. And
more fresh horses on the way, too.

TTom
77.820Only 7 1/2 months to go!TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Mon Apr 11 1994 18:4826
    I'm alreaady looking forward to Nov. 25th, when UMass and Arkansas
    play in the Hall of Fame game in Springfield.  It'd be nice to see
    UMass knock off the defending national champ in a preseason game two
    years in a row!
    
    As for your position-by-position comparison, it's scarily accurate!
    Arkansas is one whale of a team, and they match up very well agsinst
    UMass everywhere.  If Arkansas signs Kareem Reid as was rumored on
    the McDonald's game telecast (as far as I know neither school has
    signed any recruits for nexted season), the Hogs should be odds on
    to repeat.  Their one weakness (and this is stretching some) was point
    guard depth, and Reid is the best HS point guard I've seen.  Even
    though he's only 5-8, he's something special.
    
    Here's how I'd match the teams up, based on who is there now.
    
    		ARKANSAS		UMASS		 EDGE
    Center	Robinson, Wilson	Camby, Meyer	 UMass
    Power For.	Williamson, Stewart	Roe, Weeks	 Slight to Ark.
    Small For.	Rimac, McDaniel		Dingle, Bright	 UMass
    Sh. Guard	Thurman, Dillard	Williams, Trav.	 Arkansas
    Pt. Guard	Beck			Kellogg, Padilla Arkansas
    
    It's gonna be a heck of a basketball game.
    
    NAZZ     
77.821SOS!!!!!!!CNTROL::CHILDSBrillant, Charming and NastyMon Apr 11 1994 19:185
	Love to get some tickets even at scalper prices if anybody knows
 about that..........

 mike
77.822UMASS RecruitMROA::RSCHOTTThu Apr 21 1994 12:1423
         On Wednesday, UMASS announced the signing of C/PF Inus Norville
    of Virginia's Hargrave Military Academy.  I have seen Norville listed
    as anywhere from 6'8" to 6'10", which probably means he's 6'7-1/2"!
    He averaged 28 ppg and 17 rpg as a junior, and was projected in the
    50 to 70 range (1 being the concensus "best high school player in the
    country") by most of the recruiting service/basketball magazines
    that I saw, going into his senior season.
    
         Once UMASS lost out on Danny Fortson, Norville was the big man they
    really wanted, however he kept them waiting by the alter, until late
    in the Spring Signing Period.  It's just speculation on my part, but I
    think Norville really wanted to attend UVA, but they gave away their
    scholarships early and he was out of luck.
    
         With everyone back for next season, and only one scholarship
    available, I was torn over whether UMASS should go after a shooter or
    a big man.  Given some of those 30% shooting nights, and with Camby's
    awesome performance against Maryland, I might have said a quick guard
    with 22 foot range would have been the answer.  But as Al McGuire would
    say, "you can't have too many battleships!"
    
    Russ 
        
77.823good newsWMOIS::BALL_KThu Apr 21 1994 12:3515
    I  think this is a great pick up, particularlly in the short term (next
    year, if he can contribute).  They need someone over 6-7 to back-up Camby
    and its not going to be Jeff Meyer.
    
    As far as the need as guard goes, It 2 years from now where there's going 
    to be a problem.  While I agree the the guards are the weakest link 
    (particularly kellogg, who is solid, but certainly not the point guard 
    of a top ten team),  Calipari wouldn't take the seniors out of the 
    starting lineup even if they had recruited a superstar.   
    
    BTW, Its not unreasonable to expect Travieso to be better and get more 
    minutes. Look at the difference in Wiliams, Malloy, and Kellogg from
    freshmen to sophmore (Malloy.. there's a shooter I wish we had back)
    			
    					KB                            
77.824Norville looks to be a great additionTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Thu Apr 21 1994 12:4512
    I agree with the sentiment that Travieso can be the shooter UMass must
    have nexted season to compete for the national championship.  I see
    no reason why he cain't be a significant contributor.
    
    I'm very pleased with the addition of Norville.  Any time you can get
    a quality big man, you take him.  Jeff Meyer is graduating this spring
    even though he is only a junior in eligibility, and while he is
    expected to play next year as a grad student with senior eligibility,
    that is not a sure thing.  Norville is bound to be a heck of a lot
    better than Ted Cottrell as a backup to Camby.
    
    NAZZ
77.825"No point guard this year?"MEMIT::W_TROYThu Apr 21 1994 12:476
    
    Wow,  sounds lie we landed a good prospect - although I wonder if/how
    the need for a quick point guard will get met.  UMASS was noticeable
    by its silence on '94 recruits until yesterday.  Does this mean that
    Tyrone Weeks is not cutting the mustard academically? They sounds like
    similar physical types.
77.826Weeks is in the class of 1993; Norville is the class 0f 1994TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - 1995 NCAA Champs!Thu Apr 21 1994 16:0310
    Weeks is in school, and will play next season as a sophomore.  That's
    why he's not listed as a recruit for this season; technically, he
    belongs with last season's class of Camby, Padilla, and Travieso.
    
    Weeks is more of a classic power forward - 6'6", 250 pounds, very
    strong inside moves.  Norville is more of a 90s kinda center - 6'9"
    or 6'10", 225 pounds, runs the court well, has a nice touch from 15
    feet, likes to block shots.  They should compliment each other well.
    
    NAZZ
77.827great prospectSHAR0N::BAILEYWed May 11 1994 16:567
    Andre Burks has signed a letter of intent to play for UMass. Burks
    gives Umass one of the most highly regarded schoolboy point guards
    in the nation. He's 6 foot, 165 pounds, avereaged 21.5 points, 9.5
    assists, 5.5 rebounds and 3.5 steals per game for Hargrove Military
    Academy, last season. However, he has not yet qualified academically
    to play next season, although the coaches are optimistic that he will.
    
77.828METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed May 11 1994 17:084
what does a player have to do to be qualified academically??

The Crazy Met

77.829SAT >= 700ELWOOD::BAILEYWed May 11 1994 19:261
    I believe their combined SAT score must be at least 700.
77.830Looks like a very quick team, may lack reboundingTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodWed May 18 1994 13:5519
    Congrats to UMass freshman center Marcus Camby, who was named to the US
    Goodwill games roster.  He was the only freshman to make the team. 
    Here is the entire roster:
    
    G - Jerome Allen 		6-4  Jr.  Penn
    G - Randolph Childress	6-2  Jr.  Wake Forest
    G - Shawn Respert		6-3  Jr.  Michigan State
    G - Damon Stoudamire	5-10 Jr.  Arizona
    F - Michael Finley 		6-6  Jr.  Wisconsin
    F - Alan Henderson		6-9  Jr.  Indiana
    F - Ed O'Bannon		6-7  Jr.  UCLA
    F - Scotty Thurman		6-6  So.  Arkansas
    F - Corliss Williamson	6-7  So.  Arkansas
    C - Marcus Camby		7-0  Fr.  UMass
    C - Andrew LeClerq		6-10 Jr.  Florida
    C - Cherokee Parks		6-11 Jr.  Duke
    
    NAZZ
    
77.831Andre BurkLUDWIG::BARBIERIWed May 18 1994 15:477
      re: .827
    
      Any more on this Andre Burk's guy?  He sounds like the kind of
      player the team needs.  Where is Hargrove Academy located?  My
      fingers are crossed, but what stats!!
    
                                                   Tony
77.832Teammates in high school and collegeTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodWed May 18 1994 18:064
    Hargrove Military Academy is in virginia, and is the same school that
    sent Inus Norville to UMass.
    
    NAZZ
77.833Inquiring taxpayer wants to know...USCTR1::BARRYSun May 29 1994 23:107
    
    
    Calipari's been at UMass for a few years now, anybody know what percent
    of his players graduate?
    
    
    
77.834Not a bad graduation rateMROA::RSCHOTTTue May 31 1994 12:3011
         Up through the 1992-93 season, all but two of John Calipari's
    recruits had graduated from the University.  This in contrast to some
    of the previous regimes, which during the 1980's had a less than 20% 
    graduation success rate, along with some of the worst basketball teams in 
    NCAA Divsion One.  
    
         The two who haven't yet earned a degree, Harper Williams and
    Jim McCoy, are playing professional ball in Europe, and supposedly
    aren't that many credits shy of a sheepskin.  HTH.
    
    Russ                                              
77.835UMass/Michigan in Boston?TNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodWed Jun 01 1994 17:0911
    Re. the previous couple:  15 out of the 17 scholarship players Calipari
    has brought into the program have earned a degree or are on track to do 
    so.  This excludes the current freshman class, and two guys who
    transferred well before completing four years at UMass.
    
    On another matter, there was a note in Wil McDonough's column a week
    ago Saturday that stated UMass and Michigan are negotiating to play the
    first college basketball game ever at the new Shawmut Center in the
    1995-96 season.  That would be fun!
    
    NAZZ
77.83615/17 (88%) would put him too close to the Academic PantheonRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Jun 01 1994 18:048
    Nazz the only dings on Dean's unparalleled Division 1A graduation
    rates are for transfers, so in fairness, Calipari is 15/19 (79%).  Not
    bad mind you, but definitely 2nd tier stuff.
    
    HTH,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.837Wrong again, Crisper!TNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Jun 02 1994 19:508
    I don't understand, Chris.  These guys are still in school, only not at
    UMass.  The big white stiff Drapeau wewnt to a couple of schools down
    south, but ended up last year at UNH, where he was a first team all
    league selection.  Jerome Malloy is sitting out this year as a transfer
    student at Jacksonville.  Both would have been juniors this year, so
    neither should be counted against the graduation rate.
    
    NAZZ
77.838No, I'm right as usual.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Jun 02 1994 20:355
    They count against the graduation rates if they haven't gotten their
    degree with five (5) years.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
77.839Try this math on your fingers Chris: 3+2 - 5TNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodFri Jun 03 1994 13:349
    As I noted, they would be seniors this year if they had stayed at
    UMass.  For your information Chris, the senior year is usually the
    fourth year of college.  Since they would have been entering their
    senior year this coming fall, they would have two (2) more years to
    reach your five (5) year cutoff.
    
    HTH, you simp!
    
    NAZZ
77.840"Lorenzo Sutton article Sunday Globe"ASABET::TROYMon Jun 06 1994 16:328
    In case you didn't see the Globe this Sunday there was a long article
    in the sports section on Lorenzo Sutton by Mike Madden, and the host of
    law, health and bball career problems he has had since leaving UMASS in
    the '88 or so.  It's must reading for all the jocks who are betting
    only on the NBA for a future career, and thought provoking for us all
    in how even the folks in the best shape can be felled by cancer.
    
    
77.841HANNAH::ASHELet me see shake yo tailfeather...Mon Jun 06 1994 16:362
    Cancer, car accident... jail...
    
77.842"Harper Williams a 'Summer Celt'MEMIT::W_TROYTue Jul 12 1994 12:545
    
    Harper Williams is being given a tryout with the Celtics this week - he
    has a thigh bruise and missed yesterday's scrimmage. Any thoughts on
    his chances, or is this a favor to Calipari to help Williams hook up
    with a CBA team?
77.843WMOIS::BALL_KTue Jul 12 1994 13:036
    Unfortunatly, I don't think Harper has much of a chance.  At UMASS, he
    played mostly Center/PF, but in the NBA, at 6-7 and not real bulky, he'll 
    have to play small forward, and although he has great heart, I don't
    think he's has the speed or the range.
    
    							KB     
77.844TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinTue Jul 12 1994 19:0912
    
    
    
    	Harper Williams (and any other FA forwards) are in camp only
    so they'll have enough players to play 5-on-5 full court scrimages.
    With 5 forwards under contract for nexted year (Radja, Strong, Fox,
    Edwards, & Xman) there are no open spots at the forward position.
    Baring a trade or X taking the Free Agent buyout option (if the
    deadline hasn't passed yet), all the forward spots are tied up.
    
    JimH
    
77.845"Another Injury for Harper"ASABET::TROYWed Jul 13 1994 12:163
    Harper fell and separated his shoulder yesterday at practice - he said
    that it simply popped out.  Not exactly a rining endorsement for his
    durability.
77.846MROA::RSCHOTTThu Jul 14 1994 13:1514
         Harper Williams must have injured his shoulder playing in the
    Spanish Professional League this past season, as his training camp
    injury sounds like a "re-injury", and I don't recall him having
    shoulder problems while at UMASS.
    
         Regardless of the injury, Harper is destined for a career in the
    CBA or Europe, because he's a power forward, and there is no room in 
    today's NBA for 6'7" PF's.  This despite the fact that during his 
    collegiate career he routinely matched up with and outplayed forwards
    and centers 3 to 6 inches taller than himself.  About the only guy that
    I can think of that took him to school was Jamal Mashburn, and the
    Monster Mash did that to a lot of people!
    
    Russ
77.847Loe RoeWMOIS::BALL_KThu Jul 21 1994 12:1410
    For all those who can't wait to see UMASS play again next season,
    
    Apparently Loe Roe is playing on the U.S. Goodwill Games team and must
    be getting some major P.T . (he led the team in scoring in a win
    against "always dangerous" Finland)                 
    
    I assume some of the games will be on one of the Turner Networks, which
    was advertising covering the Games.
    
    						KB
77.848Caron's got a great stroke, and Burks will pump up the crowdTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Jul 21 1994 13:1716
    Lou Roe led the US team with 16 points in its 99-81 victory over
    "always dangerous" Finland.
    
    In other UMass news, at the Boston Shootout lasted weekend, incoming
    UMass freshmen won both the 3-point contest and the slam dunk
    competition.  Durfee's Jeff Caron, who will be a walk-on for the
    Minutemen nexted season, hit 17 3-pointers (without the gimmick 2-point
    bonus ball) to roll to the 3-point title.  His closest competitor had a
    mere 9.  And New Orleans' Andre Burks (all 6-1 of him) easily took the
    slam dunk title.  This kid can sky!!!  In the prelims Saturday at BU,
    he made one dunk by thoring the ball high off the back wall, catching
    it while in the air, and slamming it home.  Mark Murhy of the Herlad
    suggested he could do the in the Finals at the Garden by putting Eric
    Montross under the basket aand bouncing the ball off him!
    
    NAZZ
77.849WMOIS::BALL_KThu Jul 21 1994 14:217
    RE .848 and (.830)
    
    Nazz,                                 
    	
    	Camby was supposed to be on the Goodwill Team, as well.  Have you
    heard anything about him ? 
    
77.850"Lou replaces Camby on team"ASABET::TROYMon Jul 25 1994 12:208
    
    According to the Globe, Lou Roe is subbinh for Camby - who is taking
    summer school classes and could not work out scheduling problems.
    
    Saturday's game against Argentina had Lou hitting a three and several
    inside power move layups.  He was discussed as being one of the
    surprises on the team, especially his outside shooting.  Did anyone see
    him play against Russia last night (a losing effort)?
77.851WMOIS::BALL_KMon Jul 25 1994 12:273
    I was watching on and off. 
    He had 8 pts. last I saw and was in foul trouble all night
    It looked like the US was going to lose 
77.852Roe and Parks will be great prosVAOP28::RiceIt can't happen hereMon Jul 25 1994 16:0712
This was a very entertaining game. Roe looked great, as did
Cherokee Parks. The 'Mericans lost it at the foul line - they
shot around 50% and lost by 2. 

The US team matched up nicely in the front court, but were
completely over-matched at guard. The Ruskies had a couple of
cagey veterans who took Stottlemeier and Resper off the dribble
all night. When Raveling put in Corey Beck to play defense, the
offense stalled. He never gave Jerome Allen (Penn) a chance.

josh
77.853Lou leads U.S. over ChinaASABET::TROYTue Jul 26 1994 21:434
    
    Lou led the U.S. team to a double digit win over China Monday with 19
    points - no 3's from the box score.  I'm sure this visibility will help
    him get scouts watching senior year - even if his a tweener.
77.854WMOIS::BALL_KWed Jul 27 1994 12:234
    He seems to be getting most (all?) of his minutes at small forward, the
    position he'll end up at in the NBA, so this is great for his future. 
    Unfortunatly, for Loe, UMASS needs him at PF, but hopefully with the
    arrival of Norville, he won't have to play Center when Camby goes out
77.855"Lou vs. the Pros"ASABET::TROYMon Aug 01 1994 13:315
    
    Watched the first half of the Goodwill Games team vs. Dream Team II -
    Lou had 8 points for the whole contest but looked a little lost out
    there in the last few minutes of the first half.  Lou later had a
    spectacular put back on a rebound.
77.856MROA::RSCHOTTThu Aug 04 1994 12:3022
         The Boston Globe reports that 7 footer, Mark Blount of Yonkers,
    N.Y., is close to committing to UMASS, for the '95-96 season.  Blount
    has spent the past two seasons at Oak Hill Academy in Virginia, but is
    transferring back home for his senior season.  While his measurements
    look good, he supposedly is not in Marcus Camby's league, in the
    basketball skills department.  Most of the recruiting services rank him
    in the 50 to 100 range (with no. 1 being the consensus "best" high
    school'er in the country).
    
         In other UMASS sports news, UMASS athletes have performed well
    on the world stage this summer.  Mark Millon was the leading scorer on
    the USA Lacrosse Team which recently defeated Australia to win the
    World Lacrosse Championship.  Brianna Scurry is the starting goalie on
    the USA Woman's Soccer Team which will begin defense of its World 
    Championship in a couple of weeks.  Scurry was reportedly outstanding
    in a recent win over Germany in a Prechampionship Tournament.  And
    finally, UMASS Woman's Field Hockey Coach Pam Hixon coached the USA
    Woman's Field Hockey Team to a Bronze Medal in the Field Hockey
    World Championship, which tied for the USA's highest finish ever.
    
    Russ
        
77.857"UMASS Radio"ASABET::TROYMon Aug 08 1994 16:036
    McDonough of the Boston GLobe said that despite the best efforts of BC,
    UMASS is about to sign a Boston area radio deal for broadcasting 20
    UMASS BBall games this winter.
    
    Here's hoping that it is NOT WEEI, with its limited range especially in
    the Western suburbs of Boston.
77.858MROA::RSCHOTTTue Aug 23 1994 12:1422
         Guess which State University has the nation's best student athlete
    graduation rate?  Michigan?  No.  UVA?  Not exactly.  Cal-Berkeley? 
    Uh-uh.  Carolina?  Not!!  Why its none other than the University of
    Massachusetts-Amherst, which graduates 85% of its student athletes.
    
         The figures were released last week in the 1994 NCAA Division 1
    Graduation Rates Report.  The Report covered the past six years, 1987-
    1993.  Overall, the graduation rate for the NCAA's 301 Colleges in 
    Division 1 was 57%.
    
         Boston College at 92%, Holy Cross at 95% and Providence College
    at 100% were the New England schools with better graduation rates than
    UMASS.
    
    Russ
    
    - the Article I read listed the top 20 schools nationally, and where
      UMASS placed in the Yankee Conference and the Atlantic 10, so I
      can't report on the graduation rates of other State U's.  Among
      Yankee Conference and A-10 school's, only William & Mary, at 87%,
      placed ahead of UMASS.
                                               
77.859UMASS Football has 1-A dreams....TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Aug 25 1994 13:2535
    
    
    
    There is an article in today's Worcester T&G about UMASS!!! football.
    The head coach hopes to have the football program move up to Div. 1-A
    by the 1998 football season. There were two intermediate steps he
    mentioned in getting there.
    
    	1) The NCAA ups the number of allowed games per year to 12, while
    keeping the number of wins needed to qualify for a Bowl game at 6.
    This will allow existing 1-A teams to schedule more 1-AA schools. UMASS
    will try to be added to some 1-A schedules as soon as that change comes
    through.
    
    	2) Renovate and expand the UMASS!!! football stadium. The school is
    looking into playing home games at Foxboro, while their stadium is
    being rebuilt.
    
    	With a larger stadium, and some experience with 1-A opposition,
    he hopes to go to a full 1-A schedule in 1998.
    
    	It sounds like a reach. The article mentions that UMASS!!! has
    never sold out a football game and the must tickets ever sold was
    ~8,300 for one game. There was also no mention about what conference,
    if any, he hoped to join. The way NCAA football is going, being a
    conference member is a must, unless you have TD Jesus on your side! :-)
    Of course, 7 or 8 years ago if you told me that UMASS!!! would have a
    Top-20 Basketball team, I would have laughed!
    
    	NAZZ, it sounds like you fears of only being able to get basketball
    season tickets as part of a football/basketball package may come true!
    
    JimH
    
    
77.860""Big Time football is NUTS for UMASS:ASABET::TROYFri Aug 26 1994 14:2227
    
    Last September I spoke to the Assistant AD for Fundraising at an event
    for the Chancellor's council at UMASS.  This drive for football at 
    Division 1 is MOSTLY because the UMASS AD is from Univ of So. Carolina
    And the fellow I was talking to had been an assistant AD at Alabama.
    
    He waxed poetic about how the focus of Alabamians was football, and we
    should do the same thing. Frankly, I was stupified that these guys
    were/are talking about 1A football.  Bottom line - they seem to feel
    that 1AA is a threatened species, and second this is the way to join
    the Big East.  An article in the Globe last week discussing this 1A
    move made clear that the Big East has basically no interest in adding
    UMASS, football or not.
    
    Personally, with the the sports dollar and interest so fractionated in
    New England across the Professional Sports teams, the lack of interest
    by UMASS students and alums (the only game I have ever heard of having
    a full stadium was the 1972 BC/UMASS game - and students got free
    tickets as part of the athletic fee), the lack of obvious TV monies for
    local broadcasts,  we are looking at draining the monies from BBALL
    into a high cost sinkhole.
    
    Let's get what we've got going right (UMASS bball and the new hockey
    div 1 program) - stabilize the University's
    funding so that it doesn't have such a decaying building and
    educational program infrastructure  and stop the pipe dreams.
     
77.861WMOIS::BALL_KFri Aug 26 1994 16:0028
    
>>    Bottom line - they seem to feel
>>    that 1AA is a threatened species, and second this is the way to join
>>    the Big East.  An article in the Globe last week discussing this 1A
>>    move made clear that the Big East has basically no interest in adding
>>    UMASS, football or not.             
    
    The Problem with Div 1AA , (and Division 2 for that matter) is that you
    get most of cost of Div 1 (in scholarships, or at least partial 
    scholarships) with none of the returns, in terms of gate or alumni
    dollars or national recognition.  Hence when there was talk a few years
    back of breaking basketball into 1A and 1AA, it was the little schools
    that voiced the greatest disapproval. and You get a school like holy
    cross, who was a power (with scolarships) dropping them because of the
    cost and becoming an also-ran.
    
    Now whether UMASS should go division 1a is another question. Certainly
    the size of the school warrents it. but is the support there ? and just
    as important, I don't think there's enough talent in the NE to support
    all the teams that want 1A programs (Villanova, Connecticut, Temple,
    UMass)
    
    As far the Big East goes, UMASS will never be able to join the BE as
    lon there as A$$$$$$S like Gladchuk as the athletic directors.
    
    					KB
        
    
77.862Date for Game?STRATA::BARBIERIFri Sep 09 1994 16:495
      Hi,
    
        What is the date of the UMass/Arkansas game?
    
                                            Tony
77.863Friday, but afternoon or night?TNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodFri Sep 09 1994 18:254
    It's the day after Thanksgiving, but I don't know if it's afternoon or
    evening.
    
    NAZZ
77.864'94-'95 UMASS Men's Hoop ScheduleMROA::RSCHOTTThu Sep 15 1994 12:1436
    
    Date                   Game                      Time          TV
    
    Thur. Nov. 17      Turkish Nat'l Team             7 p.m.
    Fri.  Nov. 25      Arkansas @ Spfld. CC           7:30 p.m.   ESPN
    Sat.  Dec. 3       Kansas @ Anaheim, Ca.          1:00 p.m.   NBC
    Thur. Dec. 8       Pittsburg                      TBA
    Sat.  Dec. 10      @Maryland (Baltimore)          2 p.m.      ABC
    Wed.  Dec. 14      Princeton                      TBA
    Sat.  Dec. 17      West. Kentucky                 5 p.m.      ESPN 2
    Tue.  Jan. 3       W. Virginia @Spfld. CC         8 p.m.      A10 TV
    Thur. Jan. 5       @St.Louis                      9:30 p.m.   ESPN
    Sat.  Jan. 7       @Lasalle (Atlantic Cty.)       TBA
    Tue.  Jan. 10      @St. Bonaventure               TBA
    Thur. Jan. 12      Rutgers                        8 p.m.      A10 TV
    Sat.  Jan. 14      Pennsylvania                   9 p.m.      ESPN
    Thur. Jan. 19      @URI (Providence CC)           7:30 p.m.   Prime
    Sat.  Jan. 21      Temple                         1 p.m.      ESPN
    Tue.  Jan. 24      @Duquesne                      8 p.m.      A10 TV
    Fri.  Jan. 27      @W. Virginia                   8 p.m.      ESPN 2
    Mon.  Jan. 30      St.Bonaventure                 7 p.m.
    Wed.  Feb. 1       St. Joe's                      8 p.m.      Prime
    Sat.  Feb. 4       @George Washington             Noon        A10 TV
    Tue.  Feb. 7       @Rutgers                       8 p.m.      NJN
    Sat.  Feb. 11      @SW Louisiana                  4 p.m.      ESPN
    Tue.  Feb. 14      George Washington              TBA
    Thur. Feb. 16      Duquesne                       TBA
    Sun.  Feb. 19      Louisville @Worc. Centrum      1:30 p.m.   ABC
    Thur. Feb. 23      @Temple                        9:30 p.m.   ESPN
    Sat.  Feb. 25      @St.Joe's                      Noon        A10 TV
    Tue.  Feb. 28      URI                            TBA
    
    Sat.  Mar. 4-6     A10 Tournament @Palestra
    Thur. Mar. 9       A10 Championship Game @home court of highest
                                              remaining seed                
                                                            
77.865I like that rematch with maryland25022::BREENIt IS necessarily soThu Sep 15 1994 13:001
    
77.866I look for a 21-6 record, which would be exceptionalTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Sep 15 1994 13:3723
    What an incredibly tough non-league schedule!!!  This has to be the
    most ambitious schedule in the country.   Here are the non-league
    games:
    
    	11/25	Arkansas at Springfield
    	12/3	Kansas at Anaheim
    	12/8	Pittsburgh
    	12/10	at Maryland
    	12/14	Princeton
    	12/17   Western Kentucky
    	1/5	at St. Louis
    	1/7	at LaSalle
    	1/14	Pennsylvania
    	2/11	at SW Louisiana
    	2/14	Louisville at Worcester
    
    There is not one single breather on that list.  And the two toughest
    teams (Arkansas and Louisville) are at neutral sites rather than at the
    Mullins Center.  If UMass can go 6-5 with that non-league schedule,
    they should never leave the Top Ten all year.
    
    NAZZ
    	
77.867BIGQ::MCKAYThu Sep 15 1994 13:564
    more like 18-9 I'd think Nazz.  At least they have a good team coming
    to the Centrum this year!
    
    Jimbo
77.868ODIXIE::ZOGRANThu Sep 15 1994 14:277
    GO TERPS!
    
    Time to contact the old alma mater and get the latest info on the
    B-Ball team.  Need something to cheer about!
    
    UMDan
    
77.869Lots of Razorback fans in Springfield, ayup!!!TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Sep 15 1994 14:5816
    
    
    >There is not one single breather on that list.  And the two toughest
    >teams (Arkansas and Louisville) are at neutral sites rather than at the
    >Mullins Center.
    
    
    	Springfield & Worcester are hardly 'neutral' sites for UMASS!!!
    You have to consider these home games for the minutemen.
    
    	I bet you don't consider the Maryland game (@Baltimore) a
    neutral site.
    
    JimH
    
    
77.870There is a differenceTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Sep 15 1994 15:137
    They are still not in the Mullins Center, and the Springfield game is
    the Hall of Fame Classic, which is sold out every year on its own
    merits and is NOT part of the UMass season ticket package.
    
    Maryland plays some games in Baltimore every season.
    
    NAZZ
77.87156825::MORGANThu Sep 15 1994 15:545
    Maryland is going to be real tough this year.  They beat UMASS last
    year with pretty much a freshman lineup.  I don't recall the names, but
    there were a couple of studs.
    
    					Steve
77.873not a_ordinary JoeHBAHBA::HAASSorry, wrong species.Thu Sep 15 1994 16:155
How can you forget a name like Joe Smith.

Yeah, Maryland will be tough this year, fer sure.

TTom
77.874TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Sep 15 1994 16:2224
    
    
    
    >They are still not in the Mullins Center, and the Springfield game is
    >the Hall of Fame Classic, which is sold out every year on its own
    >merits and is NOT part of the UMass season ticket package.
    
    
    	With UNASS' rise to national prominence, they have become the
    'unofficial' home team of the HOF Classic. For good reason, it
    guarentees a sellout and plenty of local media attention.
    
    
    	And not being part of the Season Ticket Package is goodness
    too. All the alumni who didn't contribute enough $$$ (wink...wink...)
    to the school to 'win' tickets through the lottery, get a chance 
    to see the team. Same for the Centrum game.
    
    	Face it NAZZ, they are home games. The Poll Voters will certainly
    treat the games that way....
    
    JimH
    
    
77.875MROA::RSCHOTTThu Sep 15 1994 16:437
         Small nit .... Joe Smith outplayed Camby during the regular
    season, 14 pt. win by UMASS in the HOF Tourney.  In the NCAA's, Camby
    had something like 32 points, 10 rebounds and a couple of blocked
    shots, while Joe Smith scored in the low 20's.  He hardly outplayed
    Marcus Camby in that game.
    
    Russ
77.876HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Sep 15 1994 16:5310
Re           <<< Note 77.873 by HBAHBA::HAAS "Sorry, wrong species." >>>

>How can you forget a name like Joe Smith.

  Real easy.

  Now if a guy has a name like Sheet Outhouse, that you don't forget but
Joe Smith? That would be real easy to forget.

  George
77.877ODIXIE::ZOGRANThu Sep 15 1994 18:104
    The center (his name escapes me. arghh!), is a real stud.  As long as
    they beat Georgetown, I'll be happy!
    
    UMDan
77.878ODIXIE::ZOGRANThu Sep 15 1994 18:135
    I forgot his name!
    OUCH
    
    UMDan 
    
77.879Umass hockey schedule?MROA::HEIER_LSun Sep 18 1994 02:215
    Does anyone have the UMASS hockey schedule handy?
    
    Thanks,
    
    LArry
77.880"They start end of October"ASABET::TROYFri Sep 23 1994 21:313
    Not on me - but I think their first game is on NESN against ULOWELL, I
    think around OCtober 27 or so.  Stay tuned.  First official Hockey East
    game.
77.881MROA::RSCHOTTMon Sep 26 1994 11:4756
         Larry probably has seen this by now, but for those interested:
    
    Oct. 22        @ ULowell
    Oct. 29        @ Providence
    Oct. 30        @ BC
    Nov. 4         Colgate
    Nov. 5         Union College
    Nov. 11        @ Air Force
    Nov. 12        @ Air Force
    Nov. 18        BU
    Nov. 19        @ BU
    Dec. 2         Merrimack
    Dec. 3         Merrimack
    Dec. 9         @ UNH
    Dec. 10        UNH
    Dec. 16        Princeton
    Dec. 30        Notre Dame
    Dec. 31        Notre Dame
    Jan. 6         @ BC
    Jan. 7         BC
    Jan. 17        Bowdoin
    Jan. 20        @ Providence
    Jan. 21        Providence
    Jan. 24        Army
    Jan. 27        Maine
    Jan. 28        Maine
    Jan. 31        @ Holy Cross
    Feb. 3         BU
    Feb. 5         UNH
    Feb. 10        @ Merrimack
    Feb. 11        @ Maine
    Feb. 17        @ ULowell
    Feb. 18        ULowell
    Feb. 24        Northeastern
    Feb. 25        @ Northeastern
    Mar. 4         @ Northeastern
    Mar. 9-11      Hockey East Tourney
    Mar. 17-18     Hockey East Semi's and Finals
    
    A couple of notes:
    
    - UMASS Hockey is not yet selling out the Mullins Center, so those
      folks interested in attending any of the games can generally head out
      to Amherst the day of the game and buy tickets.
    
    - UMASS will undoubtedly have their heads handed to them in some of
      these games.  With basically an all freshman team last year, in their
      first year back fielding (or is it "icing") a hockey team, they won
      over 20 games playing a combination Division 3/Division 1 schedule. 
      I think they went 2 and 6 against Division 1 competition.  But Coach
      Mallon has done a nice job recruiting this past year, picking up
      three Globe All-Scholastics and a couple of Canadian kids, so
      eventually they'll do okay in Hockey East.  It probably won't be this
      year however.
    
    Russ
77.882How good do they have to get in hockey to not play BC25022::BREENMon Sep 26 1994 13:511
    
77.883MROA::RSCHOTTMon Sep 26 1994 15:0112
    Re:  77.882
    
         Ah, the quick wit and subtle humor of Senior Eagle, Bill Breen!!
    My guess is that since they are now in the same league in this one sport,
    both school's will have trouble ducking the other.
    
         Of course, Chet Gladchuk (who I believe is a UMASS MBA Grad) will
    go to great lengths to keep any mention of UMASS off of Boston Radio
    and out of the Boston Globe :^)!!
    
    Russ
    
77.884Please come to Boston....USCTR1::BARRYTue Sep 27 1994 12:2910
    
    
    If UMASS really wants publicity in the Boston market, then play in the
    Boston market.
    
    I doubt that Gladchuk could keep them out of the Garden or away from
    BU and Northeastern in basketball.
    
    
    
77.885They used to have a good rivalry25022::BREENTue Sep 27 1994 12:558
    Russ,
    	I don't know if you read any other notes in here but we(I) were
    talking about ND - Mich. State 1966 (in the barnyard note).
    
    	But I missed the game that days since I was at UMass for the big BC
    game.
    
    billthe
77.886Kill Bubba, KillMROA::RSCHOTTTue Sep 27 1994 13:015
    Bill:
    
         I betcha UMASS didn't play for no stinkin' tie!
    
    Russ
77.887Big day for IngogliaMROA::RSCHOTTMon Oct 03 1994 16:2030
         I witnessed a pretty remarkable performance by UMASS running back
    Rene Ingoglia in Saturday's game against URI, as he ran for 308 yards
    on 28 carries.  In doing so he broke the Yankee Conference single game
    rushing record which had stood since 1952.  What's truly amazing is
    that he racked up 230 yards in the first half, including TD runs of
    75 and 84 yards.  It started raining steadily during half time, and the
    field got slick and he was unable to break any really long gainers
    after the half, or he might well have put the record way out of sight!
    
         For those who don't know Rene Ingoglia's (pronounced Ree-Knee 
    IN-goal-eee-ah) story, he was a kid who was being heavily recruited by
    the Big 10 and Big East, until he tore his ACL late in his senior year
    of high school.  All the scholarship offers disappeared except for 1-aa
    UMASS.  He had the reconstructive surgery, and then redshirted his
    freshman year to rehab the knee.  He ran for over 2000 yards his first
    two seasons, and is leading the nation in 1-aa this season.
    
         I have no idea how fast he is in the 40, but on his two long TD
    jaunts on Saturday, he pulled away from the URI safeties and corners,
    even the guys who had the angle on him.  Granted the URI players aren't
    in the 4.3/4.4 range in all liklihood, but I was surprised by his speed
    nonetheless.  Perhaps his best skill though is his open field ability,
    as one of the runs featured several broken tackles and a cut back
    against the grain.  At 6' and 200 lbs. and from a small time program, I
    don't imagine the NFL will be too interested, however he might put up
    the career numbers to warrant a late round look-see.
    
    Russ
        
    
77.888IngogliaUSCTR1::BARRYMon Oct 03 1994 17:0113
    
    
    Russ,
    
    Don't forget that Sabb of the Patriots came out of UNH and Sean Jones
    of the Packers from Northeastern. While I didn't get a chance to see
    him play, anytime you run for over 300 yards against anybody, you've
    got to be some kind of player.
    
    Where is this guy from? I don't recall hearing much about him as a
    local HS player.
    
    
77.889MROA::RSCHOTTMon Oct 03 1994 17:097
    Mike:
    
        He's from the Rochester, N.Y. area.  Supposedly back a few years, he
    had offers on the table from Syracuse, Wisconsin and Ohio State, among 
    others.
    
    Russ
77.89024661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingMon Oct 03 1994 17:458
    There's another Div 1-AA back tearing them up - Avram Smith from UNH. 
    I went to the James Madison and U-Conn games and Smith had over 200 yds
    in total offense in both (as well as in their opener).  
    
    One interesting point is that Smith has already had 3 TD kickoff
    returns called back due to illegal blocks.
    
    Mark.
77.891"Mike Williams problem"ASABET::TROYWed Oct 05 1994 11:495
    It appears that Mike Williams is in hot water agian with Coach Cal. He
    has been suspended for 3 games, including the Arkansas game, for not
    meeting academic requirements.  The press release made the point that
    these standards were above NCAA standards fdor staying elgibile.
    
77.892MROA::RSCHOTTWed Oct 05 1994 15:1423
         Mike Williams and John Calipari have been involved in a battle of
    wills from the day Williams set foot on the UMASS Campus.  On several
    occasions Williams' attitude or actions have been disruptive to the
    UMASS team.  And while Williams has always been eligible academically, he
    has walked a fine line in that regard.
    
         It appears to me that Coach Cal is willing to blow off the
    Arkansas game (or at least diminish his chance of winning) in return
    for obtaining the upper hand with Williams, and hopefully removing
    further disruptions from the team this year.  Calipari has hinted that
    despite the team's quality record last season, the chemistry of the
    team left something to be desired in his mind.  Reading between the
    lines, I think he was referring to Mike Williams.
    
         Personally, I was hoping that Williams would show some maturity
    and senior leadership, and realize that UMASS can be a legitimate 
    contender for the National Championship.  It appears that he has not
    matured.  The problem Calipari has is that Williams is his best
    backcourt player.  In my opinion UMASS will not go to the Final Four
    if they are without a focused Mike Williams.
    
    Russ
        
77.893MROA::RSCHOTTMon Oct 10 1994 15:165
         Big victory for the UMASS Woman's field hockey team as they
    knocked off unbeaten and No.1 in the country, North Carolina, by a
    1-0 score on Sunday.
    
    Russ
77.894METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Oct 10 1994 15:485
I thought NC lost to Notre Dame last week to break
that 90+ game win streak.

The Crazy Met

77.895Bad week for UNC Women's SportsMROA::RSCHOTTMon Oct 10 1994 16:047
         The Lady Tarheel Soccer team was tied by Notre Dame last week
    ending their long 92 game winning streak.  
    
         North Carolina's Field Hockey team, while perennially a power,
    is not as dominant as their woman's soccer team.
    
    Russ
77.896Not speaking of field hockey...EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Oct 10 1994 16:226
    Lost in the Boston College hoopla, no mention of UNH's big (and
    extremely fortunate) win over UMass this weekend?  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
77.897Not me....USCTR1::BARRYMon Oct 10 1994 16:254
    
    
    Well, I certainly wasn't going to mention it.
    
77.898notesMROA::RSCHOTTMon Oct 10 1994 16:387
         Yeah, I caught a few peaks at the UNH-UMASS game on WMUR-TV.  Rene 
    Ingoglia was held under a 100 yards, and pulled a Kevin Turner-ish
    fumble at the goal line during the first half.  Combine that with three
    missed FG's and a nonexistent passing attack, and the UM'ies chances
    for a Conference Championship are fading fast.
    
    Russ
77.899Academic Problems on the B-ball TeamMROA::RSCHOTTWed Oct 19 1994 11:2352
         Today's Boston Globe contained a troubling article on the state
    of academics on the UMASS Men's Basketball Team.  Cutting to the bottom
    line, at least six of the players on the team, including most of the
    team's stars, are teetering on the verge of academic ineligibility. 
    Four of the players are on academic probation, which, if I interpret
    the article correctly, means that if they don't pull up their GPA in
    the current semester, they can be ruled ineligible by the school or the
    NCAA next semester.
    
         This information greatly detracts from recent data released by
    the school and the NCAA, which spoke highly of the graduation rates
    achieved by UMASS Athletics.  Additionally, it places a black mark on
    the resume of John Calipari, who early in his UMASS career was lauded
    for raising the academic standing of the UMASS Basketball Program.
    The article mentioned that 75% of UMASS Basketball players had received
    diplomas during Calipari's tenure.  This contrasts with the record
    of Calipari's predecessor Ron Gerlufson, who along with a 33% winning
    percentage, graduated few if any of the athletes in his program.
    
         The Article implied that there had been some recent turnover in
    the academic advisors/tutors available to the program, and that the
    academic advisor from 1990-93, who had been successful, would rejoin
    the Basketball Program.
    
         In building the Basketball Program, one of Calipari's stated
    methods, would be that he would take some players with "borderline
    high school records" into the program.  Clearly he has recruited some
    players that other schools stayed away from, due to their Prop 48
    status coming out of high school.  By and large, its the borderline
    players that he recruited (Bright, Williams, Weeks and Roe) that 
    continue to have problems, well into their collegiate careers.  What
    the article doesn't mention is that players such as Derek Kellogg,
    Jeff Meyer, Carmelo Travieso, and Jason Germain have had very good
    academic records over their entire careers.  As an alum, I haven't had
    a problem with Calipari recruiting the borderline students, as long
    as he makes a commitment to them to provide the tutoring and support
    they need to be successful, and that the player himself has the
    discipline to do the work.  Calipari admitted in the article, that
    he himself has been somewhat lax recently, in enforcing academic 
    discipline.
    
         As a season ticket holder, I have been excitedly looking
    forward to the coming year, as most of the experts have rated this
    year's Basketball Team, in the Top 5, nationally.  However as an
    alumnus of the University it would be unacceptable to me to have a
    Final Four team, that sinks to the level of a UNLV or Oklahoma from
    an academic standpoint.  Unless changes are made quickly both by
    Calipari's staff and the players themselves, it would appear that
    this UMASS team could fall to that level.
    
    Russ
        
77.900Typical sheap shot by the Globe against UMassTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodWed Oct 19 1994 14:0122
    I have almost a total opposite take on the article than you, Russ.
    I had a 1.6 my first semester sophomore year, and a 1.8 second semester
    that year.  I still graduated easily, went to grad school and got my
    M. Ed. to go along with my B.A.  This to me was a non-story that never
    would have been written if it were BC students in question.  It most
    certainly did not warrent placement on the front page of the Globe.
    
    None of these kids are academically ineligible.  The only one even close 
    is Mike Williams, and he has been suspended by the coach, not the NCAA,
    for three games due to his academic standing.  Marcus Camby forfeited a
    chance to play in the World University Games this summer to take summer
    school classes.  He is now on much more solid academic footing.  
    
    Only three players who completed a minimum of four years at UMass have
    not received their degrees, and Kennard Robinson will get his this
    winter.  For a state university, that is an excellent record.  
    
    I challenge the Globe to print another front page article after the
    fall semester that would list how well the players performed
    academically this fall.  It will never happen.
    
    NAZZ 
77.901And oh btw; I am awfully sorry to hear about this25022::BREENWed Oct 19 1994 14:097
    btw - Is the Springfield tipoff between Arkansas and UMAss (?#1) and is
    it sold out?
    
    Actually doesn't Umass have a 48 player coming active this year.  Donta
    seems to be the one in jeopardy and he could be replaced.
    
    bte
77.902SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Wed Oct 19 1994 14:1621
Po' po' UMass, po' po' NAZZ.

It IS a story that these kids are close to being 
academically ineligible.  And I tend to think that, 
with the sports beat being as slow as it is, that if
BC had the same situation, it would get the same ink.

I, too, had a 1.9 GPA through my firsted two years of 
college, graduated at 2.9, and went on to grad 
school.  Unlike the UMass kids, however, I didn't have
any coaches or advisers hawking my ass to study.  Nobody
gave a sh*t if I passed or failed except the Beacon Hill
bar owners.

As you know, I'm much more of a UMass fan than a BC fan,
but I think you are really scanning the grassy knoll 
here.

JMHO

=Bob=
77.904It's those damn Eagles....USCTR1::BARRYWed Oct 19 1994 15:0225
    
    
    "UMass folks would do better to look for solutions than to cry
    again...."
    
    Let's give Russ some credit. He doesn't see a BC conspiracy behind
    every rock. If I were a UMass alum, I know I'd feel closer to his
    position than to Nazz's. I predict a mention of the Jay Murphy fiasco
    any minute now.
    
    Some time ago in this notesfile, Nazz left the impression that one of
    his reasons for hating BC was that all of the "marginal students" (AKA
    knuckleheads) from his high school went to BC and prospered there. While
    this was the exact opposite of my experience in Medford and at BC High,
    and is not at all born out by the admissions data from either school, I
    decided to avoid the rathole and not respond.
    
    However, anybody who sees today's data and responds by saying that
    it's all BC's fault, really is beyond rational debate. Why bother?
    
    I like Calipari, but he's got some work to do. I believe he has
    integrity and that this might just be a case of not paying adequate
    attention to this.
    
    
77.905MROA::RSCHOTTWed Oct 19 1994 15:3834
         Now Mike, don't start giving me any credit that I didn't ask for.
    (Beware of BC Alums bearing compliments for UMASS Alums)  Like Nazz,
    when I picked up the Globe this morning I couldn't believe that this
    story merited front page space!
    
         In recent years, New England Colleges have had athletes involved
    in incidents ranging from alledged rapes, to the passing of bad checks,
    drug dealing, etc.  I don't remember any of those incidents making
    front page news.  During Calipari's first year, the two captains
    of the team he inherited were arrested in Amherst for burglary, four
    games into the season.  In my mind that's a far more serious and far
    more newsworthy story than the fact that there are several current
    UMASS players having problems in school.
    
         I believe that if a comparable study was done of the transcripts 
    of athletes in any other Division 1 Basketball Program in New England,
    we'd all be surprised at the skeletons such a study would turn up.
    
         My disappointment at these revelations involving UMASS, centers
    on the fact that whereas early in his tenure Calipari paid close
    attention to academic performance, and had a proactive support
    structure in place, he has now, by his own admission, paid less
    attention to academic performance.  In doing so, he has done a
    disservice to the kids he recruited, and to the reputation of the
    University.
    
    Russ
    
    - and I too had a few rocky semesters in College, but was able to
      graduate, go on to grad school, pass a bar exam on the first try,
      and go on to a wildly successful career at a large multinational
      computer company ........ and without any notariety in the Boston
      Globe!
                                                
77.906TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinWed Oct 19 1994 15:5121
    
    
    
    	One justification for going after the UMASS bball program is the
    fact that it is a public state university.
    
    	If BC decides to spend scholarship bucks and bend academic rules on
    borderline student athletes, who cares? But when a public university
    does it, it is playing with public tax dollars (either directly or
    indirectly). That makes it a more newsworthy story, although page 1 is
    a major reach!!!!! (I couldn't find the story at first, I kept looking
    at the fron page of the sports section.)
    
    	BTW...PLEEEEEASE spare me the "it couldn't happen at BC crap. Or do
    we have to start dragging out the Jay Murphy/BC night school stories.
    And wasn't there a player from the UK who was questionable academic
    wise? And of course we skip right over this petty academic eligibilty
    stuff, and to right to blatently illegal BC game fixing scandles!!!!
    
    JimH (not a UMASS or a BC alum)
    
77.907Gerrod Abrams.....Page 1 news.USCTR1::BARRYWed Oct 19 1994 15:5215
    Russ,
    
    Forgive me if I embarrassed you. 
    
    I very clearly remember Gerrod Abrams making the front pages of the
    Globe for a good long time when he was involved in his extra
    curriculars with somebody else's credit card. He made the news when he
    was re-instated, too, and the references were not at all complimentary.
    
    Where's the conspiracy ?
    
    Mike
    
    
    
77.909TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinWed Oct 19 1994 16:3921
    
    
    
       >Jay Murphy was pre-O'Brien or is this forever going to
       >be like Dennis Erickson trying to live down the sins of
       >his predecessors? I just don't ever see this type of thing
       >happening at BC under O'Brien so keep the 'crap' statements
       >to yourself.
    
    		True about O'Brien. But you also claimed "the school
    wouldn't allow it, Fr. Monahan(?) wouldn't allow it".
    
    		In fact it has happened at the school, despite your
    assertion that it couldn't. There any statement that "the school
    wouldn't allow it is "crap"!!!!
    
    		At least UMASS hasn't fixed any game yet....
    
    
    JimH
    
77.910MROA::RSCHOTTWed Oct 19 1994 17:008
    Re: .907 and Gerrod Abrams
    
         I don't remember Mr. Abrams being front page news, but he did
    commit a crime, and thus was more deserving of a front page spread
    than Mike Williams, and the fact that he flunked the "Biology of Social
    Issues 101".
    
    Russ
77.911 How 'bout Issues 102, 103,....USCTR1::BARRYWed Oct 19 1994 17:1011
    Russ,
    
    It was front page news, and I don't remember anyone blaming the paper,
    another university, or anybody else for the problem either. The blame
    rests with Abrams, and for O'Brien for bringing him back onto the team.
    
    What in the name of god is "Biology of Social Issues 101?" 
    
    Mike
    
    
77.912Will the Globe write a follow-up if UMass addresses the problem?TNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodWed Oct 19 1994 17:1620
    I seem to remember a few months ago Mike Milbury quitting the job as
    hockey coach at BC because the school promised scholarships to a half
    dozen more kids than they had scholarships for.  For some reason, the
    Globe never saw fit to follow up on that story, nor was it front page
    news.  I would like to know if BC settled with those kids and their
    parents, if the kids are still enrolled at BC, if BC helped the kids
    get scholarships at others schools, but we'll never hear the full story
    about that because it is BC.
    
    I don't remember seeing anything in that long article about the team's
    GPA, and how it compared to the entire student population.  I also
    didn't see anything about how the other 11 kids on the team are doing.
    I guess since they are doing well, that's not newsworthy.
    
    Finally, I just hope the Globe has the balls to print another front
    page story in January that notes how UMass responded to the problem and
    how the kids in question did in the fall term.  Believe me, if the kids
    do well, you will never see it on the front page.  No way.
    
    NAZZ
77.913Have You Seen The Globe, today or any day?USCTR1::BARRYWed Oct 19 1994 17:3323
    
    
    My Globe (and my channel 5) covered the Milbury issue pretty
    thoroughly. Channel 4 had a series of interviews with Milbury and Bob
    Loebel in which, justifiably, BC's Atthletic Department was blasted. The
    week after BC beat ND in football, there was an article, an editorial
    really, that indicated just what BC's athletic grad rate is across all
    sports. It's better than ND's and worlds better than UMass.
    
    BC's athletic department is being sued by the parents of the hockey
    players. They should be. The promises that BC made to these kids should
    be honored. This is a significant breach of trust. 
    
    As I said earlier, I certainly hope Calipari and UMass clean things up.
    
    But, even if he does, he has breached trust with these kids. He knew
    who he was recruiting. When you go after great athletes who are
    marginal students, you have a responsibility to help them. He has not,
    and now their eligibility is in jeopardy. 
    
    
    
    
77.914Where's the fire? What "wrongs" need to be cleaned up?EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Oct 19 1994 18:2229
    
>    Finally, I just hope the Globe has the balls to print another front
>    page story in January that notes how UMass responded to the problem and
>    how the kids in question did in the fall term.  Believe me, if the kids
>    do well, you will never see it on the front page.  No way.
    
    Of course not.  "News", scandalous that is, is only news once.  That's
    the American way, and it's got nothing to do with a conspiracy against 
    UMass.  The BC hockey scholarship fiasco _did_ receive a great deal of 
    attention over an extended period, and when enough smoke was generated 
    from the issue it went away.  Meanwhile as a result of this incident 
    and others no single person involved in New England college athletics 
    is the recipient of more personal animus from the Boston Globe than Chet 
    Gladchuk.  Do you really dispute that, Nazz?
    
    This "news" really isn't worthy of front-page treatment, but it's not
    necessarily because nothing happened, or nothing will happen.  It's not 
    that newsworthy because we're talking about a small number of basketball 
    players.  The issue isn't worth the outrage one way or the other.  
    If the kids don't pass again, they should be suspended, but there's 
    also no need for any hypocritical public condemnation (because that's 
    what's supposed to happen) unless someone is caught cheating or
    grade-fixing, etc.  Let's face it, we care about the games.  If the 
    rules are followed and the kids are given every opportunity but still 
    fail to take advantage, then you (and they) move on.  I don't think 
    that's as bad as it's made out to be.
    
    glenn
    
77.915amid all the furor25022::BREENWed Oct 19 1994 19:061
    And we still don't know if tipoff is sold out...
77.916duck, incoming missiles57042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Oct 19 1994 19:136
Course it will sell out. All those yuppie-folk who bought tix for
the Celtics in the Bird era (and a bit beyond) need to find another
bandwagon to jump on.

The Crazy Met

77.917HANNAH::ASHEand now... the end is near...Wed Oct 19 1994 19:242
    trouble maker...
    
77.918maybe Russ's brother has an extra ducat25022::BREENWed Oct 19 1994 19:3811
    tcm,
    	we are rapidly running out of bandwagons to jump on with radja and
    the elephants, no hockey till after Christmas, Parcells building for
    the future, Kennedy...
    
    	so jump on B.C. football and hope for one of the second tier bowls,
    or hope for an academic miracle in Amherst..
    
    	Unless you want to jump on B.U. soccer
    
    and yes I figured Springfield would be sold out even without U.Mass
77.919Tipoff Classic is sold out!MROA::RSCHOTTThu Oct 20 1994 11:0319
    Bill:
    
         The Springfield Civic Center is one of the smallest "major"
    facilities in these parts, with roughly 8000 seats.  A very small
    number of seats were made available to the season ticket holders from
    Arkansas and UMASS, and a surprisingly small number were made available
    to the general public.  Believe it or not, the majority of tickets were
    doled out to "friends" of the Basketball Hall of Fame.
    
         Could this be another scandal from Western Mass. for the Globe
    to investigate?  Lets put Michael Golden and Dan Shaunessey on this
    one.;^)
    
    Russ
    
    - BTW, does anyone know how much the Globe paid to its stoolie in the
      UMASS Registrars office to get copies of confidential student
      transcripts?
                  
77.920My ThoughtsSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Oct 20 1994 11:4841
      re: .908
    
        To echo .909 Tommy, you're replies are some of my favorites
        to read except for one thing.  Sometimes you repudiate your
        own arguments.  You can do better than that!  Your qualification
        of BC extended WELL beyond its present coach.  Then someone comes
        along with evidence contrary to the strength of your argument 
        and in midstream the support of your stance shifts dramatically.
        Why don't you be a little more consistent next time?  So you loused
        up.  Big deal!
    
      UMASS as a whole...
    
        The thing that bothers me the most is the latest grades of Williams,
        Roe, and Bright.  You can tell that we're talking a major (shall
        we say) shift in attitude.  It looked like they just didn't give
        a flying crap.  So the problem wasn't innate ability and it was
        no longer lacking any fundamentals due to maybe having a bad
        environment as a kid or anything.  It was ALL attitude.
    
        That's the part that really bothers me.  Somehow the _system_
        (and by that I mean all of UMass, i.e. Calipari, advisors, and
        all the way up to chancellor) was such that it could allow this
        to occur.
    
        One other thing that stinks is the classes they took.  Real
        preparation for the real world which world all except Camby and
        perhaps Roe will eventually need to participate in full time.
    
        It would be really cool if guys like Roe, Williams, etc. would
        excel academically and be a positive role model for kids whose
        growing up environment is similar to what theres may have been.
    
        One final thing.  Chris Knorr...I publically acknowledge that
        the educational part of your beloved Tarheels (with respect to
        student athletes) is probably a lot better than that of UMass!  
        (I recall there was a debate on that a while back.)
    
                                                  Tony
    
                                                 
77.921SNAX::ERICKSONYes I Am !!!Thu Oct 20 1994 12:2622
    
    	There are a couple of more follow up articles in the Globe today.
    They didn't make the front page, but are on the front page of Sports.
    
    	The way I see this whole thing. Is UMASS just started being a top
    ranked BB school. In order to go from nothing to top ranked. You have
    to take marginal academic athletes that perennial top ranked teams
    ignore because of the academics. With marginal students you are going
    to have marginal grades bordering on the bubble.
    	A team like North Carolina or Duke, don't have to worry about
    marginal academic students. Its a known fact that Dean Smith doesn't
    like prop 48 kids. Why worry about the academic's when you can recruit
    the best academic as well as atlethic talent.
    	Once UMASS really establishes the BB program. I don't see them
    recruiting as many borderline academic students. I don't mind UMASS
    recruiting proper 48 kids and borderline academic athletes. I see it
    more as giving a kid a chance to turn his life around. Lets face it
    if some of the prop 48 kids don't get scholorships, they don't go
    to college, they don't get a chance. For some of them not getting a
    chance means staying in the city's and bad neiborhoods.
    
    Ron
77.922Shaughnessy fast and loose with the facts as usualTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Oct 20 1994 12:5022
    I feel I must respond to the reprehensible article by Dan (Mr. Holier
    Than Thou) Shaughnessy in today's Globe.
    
    Dan states that most of the players who comprise the 75% graduation
    rate were recruited by the previous administration.  Absolutely false,
    as the chart beside his article clearly shows.  The 75% figure is based
    on the graduates from the 1987-88 freshman class to the present. 
    Calipari came to UMasas in 1988, so virtually all of the 75% were
    recruited by him.
    
    Comparing the UMass players to the Claude Rains character in the movie
    Casablanca is not only unfair but inaccurate.  None of these players
    have been accused of taking money, throwing games, or anything else
    illegal.  They are deficient in their studies.
    
    None of these students has flunked out of school and been enrolled
    in night school so they could continue to play ball.  None of them has
    been accused of throwing games.  None has stolen credit cards and rung
    up enormous bills.  Sorry we can't say the same about BC basketball
    players in the recent past.
    
    NAZZ
77.92357042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Oct 20 1994 13:086
re: .920

Jus' call him Teflon Tommy (tm)

The Crazy Met

77.92657042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Oct 20 1994 13:3312
>  Shut up, Craze.

hmm, striking too close to home, Tommy???

> Why ain't there no joy in Mudville?

shucks, and all along I was giving Tommy credit for some intelligence.
sigh, what a disappointment.

The Crazy Met

77.927Shameful.....USCTR1::BARRYThu Oct 20 1994 13:5837
    
    
    
    When an individual attending a college commits a crime, that's a
    reflection MORE on the individual than on the program and the
    institution. I capitalized MORE because I know this is going to be an
    issue. I fully acknowledge that bringing a kid to your school who is
    likely to indulge in criminal activity also reflects on the
    institution. It becomes MORE of a reflection on the institution when
    they (the coaches, administrators, and alumni) respond to the problem.
    
    Hence when Gerrod Abrams and Rick Kuhn committed crimes, that was more
    a reflection on thier character than on BC. Where I fault BC is when
    O'Brien let Abrams back onto the team. This was wrong, and a number of
    BC alums were less than happy with O'Brien for doing that.
    
    When a student is allowed to take ridiculous courses, consistently fail
    them, and continue to retain eligibility, that reflects far more on the
    institution than on the individual. When Jay Murphy was allowed to
    attend evening school to retain his eligibility (no comment on whether
    his courses were as absurd as the UMass student/athletes). The reaction
    of the school administrators was to close that loophole down. This no
    longer happens. More importantly, it should never have happened in the
    first place.
    
    Consider the reaction of UMass. They have a number of students who are
    failing. One administrator acknowledges that, "this couldn't have
    happened overnight." He's right. You don't go to ANY school for more
    than 2 years and ring up a 0.88 without it coming to somebody's
    attention. But the response of Calipari is to say, "How proud he is" of
    what he's done at UMass! 
    
    What's worse is the alums blame an unrelated university and the news
    media for bringing the problem to light! 
    
    If it wasn't so shameful, it would be laughable. 
    
77.928HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Oct 20 1994 14:2314
  One problem with trying to police this type of problem is that if the league
cracks down on schools who let students with bad grades play, some schools will
offer easy courses to the athletes to insure they keep good grades. In the old
days we use to call these "basket-weaving" courses. 

  When I went to UMASS, there seemed to be a very large number of athletes
taking "Hotel and Restaurant Management". The Rumor was that this program
contained courses who's main goal was to keep the athletes grades in the
acceptable range. 

  Baring standardized tests for players, the problem will be difficult to
solve. 

  George 
77.929Correction In .920STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Oct 20 1994 14:314
      Roe had decent grades.  I mistook his grades in my reply 
      (.920).
    
                                            Tony
77.931More infoMROA::RSCHOTTThu Oct 20 1994 15:22111
         Since the Globe saw fit to publicize selected exerpts from the
    transcripts of the UMASS Basketball Team, let me add a bit more
    information on the academic backgrounds of the players on the team.
    Please be aware that some of this information comes from UMASS
    published data, some comes from newspaper articles, and some comes
    from various athletic recruiting propaganda that I have collected.
    
         The following is the Basketball Roster entering the '94-95
    practice season:
    
    Seniors
    -------
    
         Lou Roe              Achieved the NCAA SAT minimum after several
                              attempts, and was eligible as frosh.  Heavily
                              recruited by the ACC and Big East.  The Globe
                              article indicated that he received an
                              academic warning for his GPA for last year.
    
         Mike Williams        Was unable to meet SAT minimum after high
                              school.  Attended Prep School for one year
                              and achieved NCAA SAT minimum while at Prep
                              School.  According to the Globe is now on
                              academic probation for failing to achieve a
                              2.0 GPA for two consecutive semesters.
    
         Derek Kellogg        Academic All-American, Honorable Mention
    
         Jason Germain        Solid student, Dean's List for certain
                              semesters
    
         Jeff Meyer           Pursueing a Double Major.  Recruited by
                              Yale University out of High School, among
                              others.
    Juniors
    -------
     
         Donta Bright         Enrolled at UMASS as an ineligible Prop 48
                              freshman.  Maintained better than 2.0 average
                              during his year of ineligibility.
    
         Dana Dingle          No information on high school academics.
                              Maintained better than a 2.0 average during
                              freshman and sophomore years.  According to
                              Globe Article has received an academic
                              warning for junior year academic performance.
    
         Ted Cotrell          Was unable to achieve NCAA SAT minimum in 
                              High School.  Attended Prep School after High
                              School and achieved SAT minimum score while
                              at Prep School.
    
         Rigo Nunez           No academic information known
    
    
    Sophomores
    ----------
    
         Marcus Camby         Achieved NCAA SAT minimum score after several
                              attempts, while in High School, and
                              immediately eligible as freshman.  Heavily
                              recruited by many Division 1 schools,
                              including BC.  According to the Globe is now
                              on academic probation for failing to maintain
                              a 2.0 average for two consecutive semesters.
    
    	 Edgar Padilla        Achieved NCAA SAT minimum score after several
                              attempts, while in High School, and
                              immediately eligible as freshman.  Recruited
                              by many Division 1 schools, including BC.
    
         Carmello Travieso    Attended prestigious Prep School and had
                              SAT's in the 1200 range.  Recruited by many
                              Division 1 schools, including BC.  No
                              information on college academic performance.
    
         Tyrone Weeks         Failed to achieve NCAA SAT minimum score and
                              enrolled as Prop 48 ineligible freshmen.
                              According to the Globe is now on academic
                              probation with a GPA under 2.0 for two
                              consecutive semesters.
    
    
    Freshmen
    --------
    
    	Inus Norville         Achieved NCAA SAT minimum after several
    		              attempts while at Prep (Military) School.
                              Heavily recruited by UVA.
    
        Andre Burks           Achieved NCAA SAT minimum after several
                              attempts while at Prep (Military) School.
    
        Jeff Caron            No academic information known.
    
                             -------------------------
    
         The Globe might have also pointed out that of the players
    mentioned in the article, that prior to last season, Lou Roe, Dana
    Dingle and Donta Bright had maintained averages over 2.0.  It
    appears to me that part of the reason for the dismal performance
    by each of the players last year can be attributed to Calipari's
    (admitted) recent lack of focus on academics, and turnover in the
    academic support structure available to the players (ie. tutors,
    advisors)  That's not meant as an excuse, but as an indication that
    with the proper support, players such as Roe, Dingle and Bright
    can do the work, and that the academic performance of last year can
    be improved upon.
    
    Russ  
                                                                         
77.932"What happend to privacy of records?"ASABET::TROYThu Oct 20 1994 20:5229
    My turn on this -
    
    I frankly was bummed about the coverage - front page seemed out of all
    perspective. What really bothered me was that all of these courses and
    grades were publically printed.  What ever happend to privacy of
    records?  Either they are on warning or not - fine.  But such records are
    private.
    
    Clearly the balance of the Globe could and should have included the
    other side of the academic story - the players who are doing well - it
    felt a bit like the DIGITAL press coverage we suffer under.
    
    Another point - the good and bad news of UMASS has been the freedom to
    pick/develop your own major (BDIC) - and the freedom to not pick a
    major until late in your academic career.  If you are looking for a
    path to collect gut courses and keep eligible, there is always a way
    to do that -  Seems like a lot of players need more structure.
    
    Regarding HRTA - In many rankings, the Hotel school at UMASS is rated
    top notch - just under Cornell and UNLV (of all places).  Having
    attended both Cornell and UMASS - 'hotelies' always get a few shots for
    taking cooking classes.
    
    Finally, Calipari has done great things, including focusing donations
    to investing in the library.  I hope these contributions to academics
    don't get lost.
    
    
    
77.933SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Fri Oct 21 1994 12:4322
    
    	Today's paper picks on Calipari again. Did you know Coach Cal made
    about 600K lasted year. Even though his base salary is 132K. Here is
    how he made the extra dough.
    
    o - ~94 percent of the estimated 300K for his summer basketball clinics.
    
    o - 35% of revenues Umass receives from post-season tournaments (NCAA).
    
    o - Umass's revenue from 1 away game of Coach Cal's choice. Last year
        he got the portion of Umass's revenue. From the Kentucky/Umass game
        held at the Meadowlands.
    
    o - 50K put into a pension fund.
    
    	I look at it as a creative contract. If Umass doesn't make the NCAA
    tournament, 35% of nothing is nothing. The article does say that
    Coach Cal gave part of the NCAA money and Kentucky revenue. To his
    coaching staff. So he gave them some extra money, out of his own
    pocket.
    
    Ron
77.934HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 21 1994 13:0814
  Well he's doing a good job with the team, why not?

  This grades scandal is an example of sloppiness. UMASS did a bad job of
managing player grades and caught the tabloid press on a slow news day. 

  The obvious result of any "crack down" will be to make sure someone gets
these kids into courses they can pass or into courses where they can be passed.
I don't think for one minute that any action will result in any of the kids
with low grades learning much in an academic sense. 

  Congradulations to those players who are doing well both on the court and
in class.

  George
77.935TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Oct 21 1994 13:1126
    
    
    
         > As for Halpin, the next time that he rants and raves about
         >a play in a Pats game and he's obviously wrong because he didn't
         >even watch it and he's trying to piece it all together from
         >new reports, I guess it would be good form for me to pop in
         >and say, "That's a lot of crap!" I don't think so.
    
    
    	I love it. When you are losing an argument, go with the personal
    attacks to attempt obfuscate reality. When I made a mistake in the 
    Pats discussion, I readily admitted it. I'm a "main" that way.
    
    	You spout B.S. about how pure and ethical BC is, have the facts
    pointed out to you that BC has sunk to levels that UMASS hasn't even
    approached, and your reaction is to personally attack the person
    pointing out the facts!
    
    
    	Very very sad. Too bad you can't admit you were wrong....
    
    
    JimH
    
    
77.937TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Oct 21 1994 13:3310
    
    
    	Tommy, I personally apologize that my use of the term "crap"
    offended you. It was directed at the statment, not the person who made
    it. I will try to be better behaved in the future.....
    
    	But I will continue to disagree....
    
    JimH
    
77.938HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 21 1994 13:417
  Actually I think it's suppose to be "Krap" after the guy who manufactured one
of the 1st flush toilets. No joke, they were called "Krappers" as a trade name,
not as slang. 

  So rest easy, you have been called an industrialist.

  George
77.939Coach Cal's graduation rate is over 80%TNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodFri Oct 21 1994 15:1110
    Re. Calipari's graduation rate:
    
    Of all the kids he has recruited (over 20 in six years), of those who
    made it through four years at UMass, all but three have graduated, and
    that total will be down to two when Kennard Robinson finishes up the
    two courses he need this fall for his degree in communications.  I know
    William Herndon did not graduate, and I don't remember the other player
    who didn't get his degree.  The rest have.
    
    NAZZ
77.941My Only GripeSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Oct 21 1994 15:1318
      re: .937
    
      The only problem I had with your BC dialogue was your saying
      that various people at BC would never have allowed certain 
      things.  Then someone brought something up 'pre-O'Brien' and 
      your argument miraculously CHANGED to saying some things would
      not happen with O'Brien as coach.
    
      It would have been refreshing to see you retract your support
      of BC before O'Brien and admitted that maybe you erred just
      a tad and then maintained that with O'Brien things are better
      at BC.
    
      I think discussing things with people of various and differing
      opinions can be fun, but its useless and no fun to do with 
      someone who can't seem to be wrong.
    
      And we're all wrong at some time or another.
77.942Don't see Calipari as "career educator" (not that there are many)EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Oct 21 1994 15:2812
    
>        Coach Cal also says he's proud of his cuurent contract. He's making
>        $600,000 a year, his players get nothing not even a decent education
>        and he's "proud" of his contract. Coach Cal better recruit some real-
>        ity. He sorely needs some.
    
    Naw, if this kind of media scrutiny continues, he'll just head down the
    road to Kentucky or someplace like that where nobody cares about this
    kind of "crap" ;-) , like some have contended all along...
    
    glenn
    
77.944If you quote, please quote accuratelyTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodFri Oct 21 1994 16:0911
    How did better than 80% go all the way up to 90%?  If you're gonna
    quote me, at least be accurate.
    
    What is the Amherst Seven?  I thought it was four kids.
    
    Re. course load:  remember that most college students are not
    engineering dweebs.  Some have real lives.  Some don't know what they
    wanna be when they grow up.  I took Sociology of the Family when I was
    in college - I was told it was a gut.  I got a D!!!  Sumbitch!!!!!!
    
    NAZZ
77.945BIGQ::MCKAYFri Oct 21 1994 16:154
    Nazz, I think Harper Williams is the other non-graduate your looking
    for.
    
    Jimbo
77.946MROA::RSCHOTTFri Oct 21 1994 16:2544
    RE:  77.940
    
    Tommy:
    
         I don't know if you live in Massachusetts or not, but back when
    Calipari's contract was up for renegotiation, there was some
    controversy around whether UMASS could justify paying Calipari a 
    salary commensurate with those earned by other successfuly Division
    1 coaches, when the University's budget was being cut back and
    professors were being let go.  The approach that made everyone happy
    at the time was to establish a relatively low base salary, and build
    in numerous performance related incentives that would allow for
    increasing that salary from sources outside of the University's
    coffers.  Calipari has been successful and he has he has reaped the
    profits, and not at the taxpayer's of Massachusetts expense.
    
         However, as someone who drafts contracts for a living, its
    apparent to me that the way this contract has been set up, lends itself
    to the possibilities of conflicts of interest.  But that's another
    discussion.
    
         Your statement to the effect that Calipari gets a big salary
    and his players don't get anything in return is ridiculous.  This group of
    players and the program in general, has a current problem.  It remains
    to be seen how it will be dealt with.  I, as an alumnus, am
    disappointed about it.  However in the past, Calipari has a better
    graduation rate than the NCAA average, and several of his players
    have gone on to rewarding careers both inside and outside of
    basketball.  Anton Brown is working on the staff of the Bill Cosby
    television show, Mike Byrnes is coaching at a Prep School in Virginia,
    John Tate and Cary Herrer are both sales representatives for major
    corporations, and probably making substantial salaries, and Harper
    Williams and Jim McCoy are playing professional ball in Europe.
    I wouldn't be surprised to find out that John Calipari had a hand
    in enabling his former players to land these jobs.  Additionally, Matt
    Anderson and Kennard Robinson were both considering graduate school.
    (although according to Nazz's info, Kennard Robinson hadn't yet
    received an undergraduate degree, so my information may be a bit off
    there ;^)!  
    
         Hope this helps!  
    
    Russ
                                                
77.949HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Oct 21 1994 17:0726
  I'm having trouble understanding just what the point of this report is
suppose to be. Ok, so some kids on the team have bad grades. If that breaks
some rule and they don't respond to some counseling then the solution is
simple. Just kick them off the team and pull their sports scholarship and the
problem is solved. 

  When I went to UMASS there was no one watching to see if I kept my grades up,
like everyone else on campus I understood that the responsibility was mine. If
we studied and got good grades we retained the privilege of giving them more of
our money and working toward graduation. If we didn't, we flunked out. 

  These kids have a big advantage in that many of them have sports scholarships
so all they have to do is work their butt off in class and get passing grades.
If they don't want to do that then fine, they can take a hike and someone else
can take their scholarship. 

  Why blame the coach or anyone else if these kids goof off and fail to get
good grades? Is anyone hiding their books or preventing them from going to
class? 

  I can accept that members of the team should be required to keep up a 2.0
average but if they don't, that's the fault of the student unless someone is
actually interfering with their ability to study. And from the fact that
several students are doing very well that appears not to be the case. 

  George 
77.950EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Oct 21 1994 17:1520
    
  >> Of all the kids he has recruited (over 20 in six years), of those who
  >> made it through four years at UMass, all but three have graduated,
   >
   >  If there were "over 20 kids" and all but two graduated after Kennard 
   >  Robinson finishes up then that makes at least 18. 18 of 20 is 90%. If 
    
    The slight-of-hand here is the words "of those who made it through
    four years", which is obviously not all 20 recruits.  Without that
    information it's pretty tough to say what 80% means.  One of the
    objections I've always had to these NCAA stats is this business around
    "after four years", "after five years", etc.  One would like to think
    that if a kid makes it through 4-5 years at a school he couldn't
    help but graduate (e.g. ACChris' "100%" graduation rate under Dean
    Smith).  One would like to think that.  But in the absence of that, 
    where you're just upfront about it and admit that some kids aren't
    going to make it, it'd be nice if the NCAA used meaningful stats.
    
    glenn
    
77.951CorrectionSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Oct 21 1994 18:382
      My .941 was a reply to .936 and not .937.  Sorry for
      the mistake.
77.952UMASS football on 11/05/9456821::GAUDETWed Oct 26 1994 18:435
    I didn't see a '94 UMASS football schedule posted here.  At any rate,
    I'm interested in knowing if they'll be at home on Nov. 5th, and if so
    who they're playing.
    
    ...Roger...
77.953Remaining Football ScheduleMROA::RSCHOTTWed Oct 26 1994 19:565
         UMASS Football closes the season with four home games, BU on
    October 29, Northeastern on November 5th, Youngstown State on November
    12th and UCONN on November 19th.
    
    Russ
77.954Thanks!56821::GAUDETWed Oct 26 1994 20:351
    
77.955BC Hockey roasted today.....USCTR1::BARRYThu Oct 27 1994 11:418
    
    
    Any comments, predictable or otherwise, from you UMass alums on the BC
    hockey article in today's Globe?
    
    Still feel there's a conspiracy?
    
    
77.956A couple of hockey questions56821::GAUDETThu Oct 27 1994 14:526
    Anybody know what time the hockey games are played?  I am particularly
    interested in the 11/4 and 11/5 games.  According to the schedule
    posted in .881 these are home games (which I assume are at the Mullins
    Center).  How much are tickets?
    
    ...Roger...
77.957RE: 77.955MROA::RSCHOTTThu Oct 27 1994 15:1021
         I am shocked and saddened to learn that officials of Boston 
    College would violate and betray the sacred trust that exists between 
    a recruit, his or her parent, the coach and the University, in the
    recruiting process.  I can absolutely assure the concerned readers
    of this file that such an egregious travesty would never occur at
    a fine institution such as the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    Coach Mallen, Athletic Director Marcum, and University President
    Hooker have too much integrity to ever let such events transpire!  
    
         The next revelation that will come out, is that the BC Hockey 
    Staff actually promised these recruits that during their four years 
    at the Heights that they would play on a Beanpot winning team!
    
         Oh, the horror of it all!
    
    Signed,
    
    Concerned Hockey Fan
    
    - and by the way, what was Kevin Stevens GPA, anyway?    
      
77.958See Tommy, I'm getting better I didn't use the crap word!TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinThu Oct 27 1994 15:3515
    
    
    >...  I can absolutely assure the concerned readers
    >of this file that such an egregious travesty would never occur at
    >a fine institution such as the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    >Coach Mallen, Athletic Director Marcum, and University President
    >Hooker have too much integrity to ever let such events transpire!  
    
    
    	Oh please, Russ. Spare me this cr... erh, "crud" that it couldn't
    happen at UMASS!!!
    
    JimH :-)
    
    
77.959MROA::RSCHOTTTue Nov 08 1994 12:2628
         Kudos to the Sunday Boston Herald for printing a more balanced
    perspective on the academic controversy swirling around the UMASS
    Basketball Team.  Along with acknowledging the less than satisfactory
    GPA's of several of the current players, the Herald also publishes the 
    degree status and current careers of every player who has played at least 
    one year for John Calipari.  Suffice it to say, that Calipari has
    nothing to be ashamed about concerning his past record.  UMASS
    President Michael Hooker is quoted as saying that "Coach Calipari is as
    committed to academics as any Coach he has ever dealt with".
    Additionally, the article points out that the University took corrective 
    measures in June, immediately after the grades were released for the 
    Spring semester, to address the substandard academic performance of some 
    of the players.  The original Globe article implied the University went
    into damage control, only when it became known that the GPA's were
    about to be published, and the only significant action was to suspend
    Mike Williams for three games. 
    
         Not mentioned in the article, but I have it from sources at the 
    University, is that USA Basketball (the folks who organize the teams to 
    represent the U.S. in international competition) put considerable
    pressure on Calipari and the University to excuse Marcus Camby from
    summer school, to free him up for participation in this past summer's
    Goodwill Games.  Camby was not allowed to play, and the U.S. was stuck
    with Cherokee Parks and Andrew LeClerq at the center position for the
    national team.  Hardly the action of a program unconcerned with
    academic performance.
    
    Russ
77.960Inside SportsSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Wed Nov 09 1994 15:1313
      Inside Sports predicts UMass to be #4 team in the country.
    
      I might have 1 and 2 switched, but I believe the top 4
      was:
    
        1) Arkansas
        2) North Carolina
        3) Cincinnatti
        4) UMass
    
      By the way, UMass killer Maryland is picked at #6 this year.
    
                                                Tony
77.961In the "they got screwed" departmentMROA::RSCHOTTWed Nov 09 1994 15:5015
         The No.6 ranked UMASS Woman's Field Hockey Team was inexplicably
    left out of the 12 team NCAA Championship Tournament, after failing to
    win the A-10 Tournament.  (a 1-0 loss to arch rival Temple)
    During the course of the year, UMASS had defeated No.1 North Carolina, 
    and No.2 (at the time) James Madison, as well as BE Champion Boston 
    College.
    
         Adding to this surprising decision is the fact that perennial
    power UMASS, is coached by HOF'er and U.S. National Team Coach Pam
    Hixon, who is on temporary leave while she is preparing the National
    Team for the Olympics.  You would think the team would have some "pull"
    in high places.
    
    Russ
    
77.962I know....USCTR1::BARRYWed Nov 09 1994 16:306
    
    
    		Must be The Globe and BC......
    
    
                
77.963MROA::RSCHOTTWed Nov 09 1994 16:503
    Re:  77.962
    
    Nazz was right all along!
77.964CNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthWed Nov 09 1994 16:557
 The Bearcats lost Donitnio Wingate and they're still ranked that high?
 What did they do load up on Jucos? UNC as always over-ranked and under-
 coached.........

 mike

77.965Me TooSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Wed Nov 09 1994 19:251
      I wondered the same thing about Cincinnatti...
77.966More of the sameTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodThu Nov 10 1994 14:199
    Two nights ago, BC played Marathon Oil.  They squeaked by them at the
    end of the game, and won by 6.  The Globe had a reporter at the game
    and gave it a relatively large play.  Last night, UMass played the 
    same Marathon Oil team.  The Minutemen were up 15 at the half, saw the
    lead build to 20 or so, then cruised to the victory.  The Globe sent
    no reporter to the game, and had one paragrph about the game in this
    morning's paper.
    
    NAZZ
77.967BC Win Too Much For Oil.USCTR1::BARRYThu Nov 10 1994 15:075
    
    
    BC softened them up for you. You should be thankful.
    
    
77.968What's going on?MROA::RSCHOTTThu Nov 10 1994 16:1241
         You know, Nazz is right, something strange is going on here.
    On the one hand you have BC playing Marathon on Tuesday.  BC by all
    accounts is in a rebuilding year.  The Globe sends a reporter and 
    publishes a feature report on the game.  Now BC has some interesting
    players.  As a college hoop junkie, I was very interested in finding
    out on Wednesday how Herren, Thomas and Abrams played, and I was 
    thankful for the article.
    
         On Wednesday, UMASS plays Marathon.  UMASS is arguably the No. 2
    team in all of college basketball.  If you go along with that
    assumption, that means that UMASS has the best chance of bringing home
    an NCAA Championship in one of the two major sports, of any New England
    team, since the Bob Cousy Holy Cross teams of the early '50's!!  The
    Globe sends no reporter, and publishes a one paragraph report from the
    wires services.  You have the added twists of a direct,  
    immediate comparison to the BC game, and the angle of Marathon's best
    player, Tony Barbee, returning to his alma mater.  Yet the game doesn't
    merit any coverage in the Globe's opinion.  Something strange is
    going on.
    
         Lets go back two weeks.  Just as the Academic controversy is dying
    down, the Boston Globe Ombudsman publishes an editorial in his very own
    newspaper, whereby HE CHALLENGES THE JOURNALISTIC INTEGRITY OF THE
    GLOBE FOR PRINTING THE ARTICLE (on the UMASS basketball Team Academic
    situation) IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!   At the same time, FOR THREE DAYS
    RUNNING, the Globe publishes a very nice human interest story on the 
    BC Football team, and how they have "adopted" a 10 year old, dying
    cancer patient.  The contrast is pretty obvious.
    
         Now, lets take my obvious UMASS bias out of the equation.  Boston
    University has the finest, top to bottom, mens and womens athletic
    program in New England, as judged by the USA Today, Sears Trophy
    calculations.  Dartmouth, UCONN and UMASS are down the list, and BC
    doesn't appear on the charts.  BU is all of what, 4 or 5 miles down
    Commonwealth Ave. from BC?  BU gets even less press than does UMASS!!
    
         If the Globe I-team wants to investigate a scandal, perhaps they
    need look no further than their own paper's ties to Boston College.
    
    Russ
                                                
77.969The great Marathon Oil scandal...EDWIN::WAUGAMANBrowns rule, Pats SIP!Thu Nov 10 1994 16:198
                                                                  
    It's obvious that the Globe is guided by economic forces: by slighting
    UMass they attract legions of UMass readers intent on scouring the fine
    print of the sports pages with great scrutiny in order to detail the 
    unfairness of the coverage... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
77.970obscessionMROA::RSCHOTTThu Nov 10 1994 16:3416
    Glenn:
    
         From last week's 7 editions of the Boston Globe:
    
         Syllables last week dedicated to BC Fullback David Green = 325
    
         Syllables last week dedicated to UM Fullback Rene Ingoglia = 120
    
         :^)!!!
    
    Russ
    
    - but I'm not getting paranoid about this or anything!!!      ;^)!!
    
    
    Russ
77.971TLE::PHILLIPSThu Nov 10 1994 17:134
Umass basketball will get plently of attention once things get going. Umass football
never will.

77.972 UMass v Marathon Oil.USCTR1::BARRYThu Nov 10 1994 17:3821
    
    
    The paradox here is that if UMass had lost to Marathon, that really
    would have been news (like man bites dog, right?) and more than likely
    would have been given plenty of space on the sports page AND hoardes of
    UMass whiners would have been furious...
    
    But why cover a game that means nothing to UMass and even less to the
    reading public within 128? 
    
    One could say that this was the very first game for the only New
    England program to advance to the Elite Eight last year and was
    newsworthy for that reason alone. The first game for a program that
    features lots of local student/athletes, not guys from New York and
    Connecticut who can't ring up a 2.0 GPA taking the Pschology of Sports
    Broadcasting (or whatever).
    
    Tony Barbee? Not much of an angle there.
    
    
    
77.973ODIXIE::ZOGRANwhatchyalookinat?Thu Nov 10 1994 18:583
    Elite Eight?
    
    UMDan
77.974But noone answered me: Who's playing in tipoff???25022::BREENThu Nov 10 1994 19:0925
    Hockey coverage is distributed evenly amongst bc,northeastern and bu.
    
    BU soccer should get more coverage but the sport is the problem.
    
    UMASS football must compete with all the special interest stuff.
    
    BC is only big basketball program in town, Northeaster with Reggie etal
    got a lot of coverage a few years back.
    
    That leaves Umass basketball.
    
    	1.  How about Herald and rest of suburban papers - whats their
    coverage like - same as Globes.
    
    	2.  Hold onto your hat.  GLOBE IS MISSING THE BOAT BY NOT PUSHING
    UMASS BASKETBALL BIGTIME!!!
    
    		Personnally I'd like to see Cal's team be the Boston's team
    		especially since BC has chosen yearly to avoid a rigorous
    		non-league schedule not to speak of a less than aggressive
    		recruiting program.
    
    		One thing that would bring the Globe in would be more tv
    		exposure for UMASS althought it seems they got a lot last
    		year.
77.975CNTROL::CHILDSSwimsuit Issue - Sonic YouthThu Nov 10 1994 19:379
 while not great coverage, The Worcester paper had about 3 paragraphs on the 
 UMASS game last night. Talked about high scorer Loe Roe, the ebb and flow
 of the game amd mentioned that Tony B. played for Marathon........

 I think Worcester gives UMASS better coverage than the Globe because
 UMASS has been playing the Centrum atleast once a year......

 mike
77.976rebuttal to .972MROA::RSCHOTTThu Nov 10 1994 19:3939
    Re: 77.972
    
    Mike, Mike, Mike,
    
         You are being blinded by those Maroon and Gold tinted glasses
    that you are wearing, if you don't see the double standard at work
    here.
    
         Plus your arguments justifying the Globe's story selection
    policies don't hold together either.
    
          ".... a program that features lots of local student athletes,
           not guys from N.Y. and Connecticut who can't ring up a 2.0
           GPA taking the "Psychology of Sports Broadcasting ..."
    
    From memory, BC's current roster has local's Chris Herren, Bevan Thomas
    and Mickey Curley; and Mssrs. Granger, Woodard, Grant, Molinsky,
    Jourdan, Piwerka, Hrbowski and Abrams, hailing from out of state places
    such as Los Angeles, Ca., Detroit, Mi., and Ontario, Canada!  Right,
    a bunch of local kids.  UMASS has five Massachusetts residents on its
    roster.  So there is no differentiator there.
    
         Secondly, we are going to have to take your word that the BC
    roster is chock full of exemplary scholars, because the Globe has not
    chosen to publish an expose on their student transcripts.  I for one
    have no interest in what Bevan Thomas pulled down for an SAT score
    coming out of high school.  And more power to Danya Abrams if he
    nailed an A- in the core requirement "Important Jesuits of the 15th 
    Century", or a B+ in the Honors course "The Famous Speeches of Tip
    O'Neil"  I'm being a bit facetious, but the fact remains we have no
    idea of the quality of student athletes on any local team .... other
    than at UMASS, and all thanks to the Globe.
    
         The bottom line remains that BC is treated one way by the Boston
    Media and especially the Boston Globe, and every other institution
    is treated another way.
    
    Russ    
         
77.977PC closer to Boston, UMass closer to HartfordILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersThu Nov 10 1994 19:5427
>>         The bottom line remains that BC is treated one way by the Boston
>>    Media and especially the Boston Globe, and every other institution
>>    is treated another way.
    
	Disagree. BC basketball and UMass basketball are treated differently
	by the Boston Globe.
         
	1. Hockey is treated equally - BC, BU, Northeastern and Harvard all 
	   their share of coverage. UMass Lowell, UMass Amherst and Merrimack
	   get less coverage. The first four schools mentioned are in Boston,
	   the others are in Massachusetts, but outside the 128 belt.

	2. BC is the only school in the Boston area that plays top notch
	   college basketball. UMass plays big time college hoops, but they
	   are no where near Boston. Heck, Providence College is closer
	   to Boston than UMass Amherst, yet I don't see the Friar Alumni 
	   belly aching about lack of coverage.

	3. Why should the *Boston* Globe (not Massachusetts Globe) devote
	   a lot of time and space to UMass? The majority of their readers
	   are in the 128 belt, not out in Western Mass. 

	Seems like a lot of useless whining on the part of UMass alumni
	to me ..

	Vinny

77.978Also, "The Art of the Syllogism or Never Beg the Question"25022::BREENThu Nov 10 1994 21:139
    Russ,
    	St Ignatius the founder of the Society of Jesus wasn't born until
    1491, the end of the 15th century.
    
    	Perhaps the course you were thinking of was "The life and Times of
    the Venerable Bede"  or "Eusebius, Iraenius and Polycletus and other
    Great Minds"
    
    	the books are available for a small service fee
77.979Local coverage.....USCTR1::BARRYFri Nov 11 1994 11:2831
    Russ Ol' Buddy,
    
    I was being a little facetious about the "local boys." We haven't had a 
    good UMass/BC tussle in here for a while and, to be honest, I kinda
    like to fan that particular flame.
    
    I live just outside of Worcester. Lots of BC alums near Worcester. The
    Worcester paper never, and I mean never, gives BC any serious ink. For
    example, BC v Suracuse, a big regional game with a post season bowl bid
    on the line for both teams, was not mentioned one time this past week.
    What do they print, you ask? Lots and lots about the 2-9 Crusaders and
    a "special interest" article on some guy from Worcester State. The
    Assumption Greyhounds get some ink as do the WPI Whatevers, but I'm
    sure you get the idea by now. The Worcester paper covers what's big in
    Worcester, and that's always going to be Holy Cross et al.
    
    The Worcester paper does, as somebody pointed out earlier, give UMass
    some ink. But never, ever as much as Holy Cross, whose basketball
    program is foundering badly. I don't get the Lowell Sun, and don't even
    know what the Springfield paper is, but I've got to believe they cover
    the local boys more than teams great distances away from their
    readership.
    
    By the way, to fan the flames a little bit more, the sinister arm of
    Fr. Monan and his evil puppet the Globe have struck again this morning,
    somehow infiltrating the Herald, which ran a TWO PAGE SPREAD on the BC
    Eagle basketball program.
    
    Where will it end ?
    
    
77.980MROA::RSCHOTTFri Nov 11 1994 11:3921
    Re: .978
    
    Bill, 
    
         Since we all know that St. Iggy was the ONLY important Jesuit of
    the 15th century, then wouldn't you agree that its obvious that the A-
    Danya Abrams received in "Important Jesuits of the 15th Century" was 
    for a course with a 7 page text book and lightweight content?  ;^)!!
    
    Re: .977
    
    Vinny, 
    
        Given that there are over 100,000 UMASS Alums living east of Rt. 495
    you'd think the Globe might be interested in not offending such a 
    significant block of readers.  And Amherst is all of 72 miles, as the golden
    eagle flies, from Boston.  Or are you one of those Bostonians who still
    expects to run into Native Americans once you travel west of Worcester? 
    
    Russ
                                                                         
77.981SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Nov 11 1994 11:4119
| 3. Why should the *Boston* Globe (not Massachusetts Globe) devote
|    a lot of time and space to UMass? The majority of their readers
|    are in the 128 belt, not out in Western Mass. 

Da Globe is the defacto newspaper of the majority of New
England, much as the NY Times is the defacto newspaper of
the entire country.

A newspaper is a corporation, thus doesn't "owe" anyone 
anything, other than their ownership.  The Globe covers 
what it will think will sell papers.

While I haven't made the detailed study that many of you
have, if indeed they feel BC sports will sell more than
UMass, I think they are mistaken.  I think a big-time
college hoops schedule like UMass plays would be a big
draw in the Boston area.

=Bob=
77.982?ILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersFri Nov 11 1994 12:1552
>>        Given that there are over 100,000 UMASS Alums living east of Rt. 495
>>    you'd think the Globe might be interested in not offending such a 
>>    significant block of readers.  And Amherst is all of 72 miles, as the 
>>    golden eagle flies, from Boston.  Or are you one of those Bostonians 
>>    who still expects to run into Native Americans once you travel west of 
>>    Worcester? 
    
	No longer a Bostonion, started in Rhode Island, moved to the Boston 
	suburbs for a few years, and have spent the last 5+ in the sticks
	of New Hampshire ... as for the Globe offending all those UMass alum,
	I don't think they are, if the Globe felt that covering UMass 
	basketball would increase sales, then they would cover them. The Globe
	is out to make a profit, not tender to the promotional needs of a
	particular university. They cover the stories that they think will sell
	newspapers.

	It just appears to me that the UMass supporters are jealous of the
	coverage that BC gets in the Globe. Almost all the UMass supporters
	I have met (and I have met quite a few, going to almost all of the
	UMass NCAA tournament games in the last three years) dislike BC, while
	most of the BC supporters have no particularly strong feelings about
	UMass.

	And the reason I brought up distance is simple, papers cover the
	towns/schools/etc that are LOCAL to them. BC is local to the Globe,
	UMass is not. Other major schools such as PC are closer to the Globe
	than UMass. UMass is closer to Hartford, Worcester and Providence 
	than it is to Boston, why not rag on the Providence Journal, the 
	Worcester paper or the Hartford paper for their lack of coverage
	of the Minutemen? Just because the Globe is in the same state 
	doesn't mean they have to cover the Minutemen in depth.

	Now, if the state school of UMass-BOSTON was playing big time
	hoops and they were getting slighted by the media, then you would
	have a legitimate beef.

>>	While I haven't made the detailed study that many of you
>>	have, if indeed they feel BC sports will sell more than
>>	UMass, I think they are mistaken.  I think a big-time
>>	college hoops schedule like UMass plays would be a big
>>	draw in the Boston area.

	Bob,

	Boston is a pro town first. College sports is way down the line
	in order of importance. Unfortunatley for the college fan in this
	area, this is all to true. (And it is one of the reasons I think
	that teams like BC and UMass have had trouble keeping the local talent
	in the past - the local college teams just do not get the media 
	coverage that they get in other parts of the country.)

	Vinny
77.983SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Nov 11 1994 12:2920
| Boston is a pro town first. College sports is way down the line
| in order of importance. Unfortunatley for the college fan in this
| area, this is all to true. (And it is one of the reasons I think
| that teams like BC and UMass have had trouble keeping the local talent
| in the past - the local college teams just do not get the media 
| coverage that they get in other parts of the country.)

While this is generally true, I think that college sports
are on the uprise, even in Boston.  I see several reasons:

	o The pro teams sip of late.
	o Pro fans are getting tired of hearing about 
	  contracts, money, strikes, etc.
	o The coverage of sports has exploded the past 
	  few years, with cable tv, ESPN, and the like,
	  and collge sports are now covered like never
	  before.

=Bob=
77.984WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MLets Go HoyasFri Nov 11 1994 13:068
    
    
    | Boston is a pro town first.
    
    
        So when are they getting a Pro baseball team?
    
    Chap
77.1000ROCK::GRONOWSKIDawgs RULE, Pats SIP!Thu Nov 17 1994 13:382
77.1001SOLANA::MAY_BRClinton happensThu Nov 17 1994 18:503
    Hey groaner, why don't you do something useful, like telling people
    they must not have much work to do if they can waste that much time in
    notes.
77.1002PTOS02::JACOBRsnoring thru my lifeThu Nov 17 1994 19:005
    Whadya expect from a moo-ron who roots fer Clevescum and brownnoses
    HAL???
    
    JaKe
    
77.1003FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Nov 17 1994 19:471
    OH!  So *THAT* is how Paul's nose got like that!
77.1004Over 8000 at the Mullins Center lasted nightTNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodFri Nov 18 1994 13:109
    UMass, after a shaky first six minutes, exploded for a 23-0 run to zip
    past the Turkish Jr. National team lasted night.  Camby and Padilla
    combined for the first 25 (!) UMass points, 16 by Camby.  He finished
    with 26 and 7 rebounds.  Padilla had 12, Bright 10, Kellogg and Dingle
    9 each.  Lou Roe did not play, due to a pulled hamstring.  He will sit
    out practice over the weekend and hope to be at full strength for
    Arkansas.
    
    NAZZ
77.1005SCOONE::MCCULLOUGHHakuna Matata - means no worries...Fri Nov 18 1994 13:552
Thanks for the report, NAZZ.  Didn't hear anything about the 
game in the Boston media.
77.1006I thought JD had been tutoring Donte Not-So Bright...CAMONE::WAYThe Devil's to pay!Fri Nov 18 1994 14:3026
A funny mail from JD to me on this game:


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:	US2RMC::"devlin@xyvision.com" 18-NOV-1994 10:52:54.58
To:	cam::way
CC:	devlin@xyvision.com
Subj:	A win ... and a loss...

Saw -

Lasted night, the UMASS Minute-men beat the Turkey
Juniors in Basket-a-ball.  The Turkey Juniors, of course,
have teeny weeny butterfilberts....

But all was not lost for the boys from that hoop
hotbed of Ankara -  they beat Donte Bluto Bright
and the boys in a halftime spelling bee.

UMASS failed to spell one word correctly...

If I don't talk to ya, have a fine turkey day..


JD

77.1007USCTR1::BARRYMon Nov 28 1994 10:575
    
    
    Congrats to the Minutemen.......
    
    
77.1008Congrats Coach Cal and the Minutemen!!!!!TNPUBS::NAZZAROWill edit for foodMon Nov 28 1994 12:5420
    NUMBER ONE BAY-BEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    A total domination of the former #1 team in the country!!!  Lou Roe
    emphatically demonstrated to Corliss Williamson who the #1 forward is
    in college basketball.  Donta Bright showed that he is a legitimate
    big-time player.  Padilla and Kellogg outplayed Arkansas' backcourt
    and never got rattled by their pressure.  And UMass' depth matched the
    Hogs player for player off the bench.
    
    I was working Friday night (but of course I taped the game), and called
    my brother at halftime of the Celtics game (he's also a UMass grad).
    I asked him what the score was.  He said "Do you really wanna know?"  I
    said that bad, huh?  He told me 52-36, but neglected to say who was up!
    I of course thought the worst and was pleasantly surprised when he told
    me it was us up 16!
    
    As soon as I got home from the Garden I slipped that tape in, and the
    game was just as sweet as if I saw it live!
    
    NAZZ
77.1009Nice little winMROA::RSCHOTTMon Nov 28 1994 13:0144
         Hey, it's only one game, and with No. 7 Kansas and No. 10 Maryland
    coming up in the next two weeks UMASS's stay atop the polls could be
    shortlived, but still, a 24 point drubbing of the defending champs is
    pretty sweet!!
    
         A couple of thoughts:
    
    - With Arkansas coming in fresh off the banquet circuit, and UMASS
      suffering with the underachiever label from its NCAA loss to
      Maryland, and then pilloried in the press for its academics, a
      fired up Minuteman team was to be expected.  Add in the partisan
      crowd and Corlis Williamson's statement that the Hog's Second Team
      could beat UMASS, well taking UMASS and the five points wasn't a bad
      bet!!
    
    - It will be interesting if Arkansas and UMASS meet again in March or
      April.  Arkansas has a clear quickness advantage in the back court
      and for a short time late in the second half their press bothered
      UMASS.  On the flip side, UMASS has an unbelievable quickness and
      rebounding advantage in the front court.  
    
    - Billy Packer, while fawning over Williamson and Thurman during
      yesterday's Georgetown game, stated that with 15 and 17 points
      respectively, that they weren't the reason for Arkansas's loss on
      Friday.  He didn't bother to mention that the players they were
      matched up with Roe (34 pts. 13 rebs) and Bright/Dingle (34 points
      between them) played pretty dominant games!  Course CBS has
      Arkansas on the tube alot this winter!
    
    - I don't expect UMASS to shoot 80% from the charity stripe all that
      often, but if they can raise last year's 64% free throw percentage
      to 70% plus, they will be in much better shape come tourney time!
    
    - Kansas plays a frontline (at times) with 7'2" Oostertag, 6'11"
      Lafrentz, and 6'10 Pollard.  UMASS should be able to run a bit.
    
    - UMASS's first year players, Norville, Burks and Weeks, came off the
      bench early and in front of Jeff Meyer and Rigo Nunez.  Norville in
      particular gave the UM'ies a nice lift!
    
    - It was nice to see Travieso drain a couple of treys at opportune
      times!
    
    Russ
77.1010MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Nov 28 1994 13:1113
    
      I know that I'm going to be accused of just being contradictory
     BUT I really think that Nolan Richardson could have called timeouts
     at critical junctures in the second half when UMass started rolling
     but didn't just to send a message to his team that no their second
     team can't beat a team the calibre of UMass and no you can't just
     sleepwalk through the season and pick up the championship trophy
     at the end. That's not to downplay the immenseness of Roe and Camby
     and especially Kellog who may not be the flashiest point guard in
     the country but he distributes the ball and protects it well. He's
     not prone to the stupid turnover the way the more athletic Padilla
     is though both can hit the trey. Nice to be no. 1 but it is not
     even December yet.
77.1012Lou Roe roolz!HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Nov 28 1994 14:160
77.101356953::HALPINJim HalpinMon Nov 28 1994 14:1622
    
    
     > I know that I'm going to be accused of just being contradictory
     >BUT I really think that Nolan Richardson could have called timeouts
     >at critical junctures in the second half when UMass started rolling
     >but didn't just to send a message to his team that no their second
     >team can't beat a team the calibre of UMass and no you can't just
     >sleepwalk through the season and pick up the championship trophy
     >at the end.
    
    	Actually Tommy, I read somewhere over the weekend (Probably in the 
    Worcester T&G) a quote by Richardson basically admitting he
    intentionally didn't call TO's, for the reasons that
    you state. And of course they responded by trashing Georgetown.
    
    	A nice win by UMass, but its only one game and the UMass fans
    shouldn't get too excited about being ranked #1. The last game of the 
    season is much more important than the first!
    
    
    JimH
    
77.101457042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Nov 28 1994 14:214
and it even made front page of the Globe which should make
some folks in here happy.

The Crazy Met
77.1015The Globe....USCTR1::BARRYMon Nov 28 1994 14:437
    
    re' -1....
    
    Yeah, I had to go five pages deep into my Globe to learn about BC's
    tough win against a fired up Cal-Poly, San Luis Obisbo team. Jeesh.
    
    
77.1016SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Mon Nov 28 1994 14:469
    
    	Bob Ryans column in Saturdays paper didn't give them much credit.
    He did his best being #1 now doesn't mean anything. Lets see how
    they stack up against X, Y, and Z, At the end of the season. He then
    listed his all time top 5 New England teams. He listed Holy Cross (
    Won Championship), a BC team, A UCONN team, Another HC team, then
    the '91-'92 UMASS team.
    
    Ron 
77.101757042::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Nov 28 1994 14:485
hot off the newswire.

UMass is ranked #1, UNC #2, Kentucky #3, Arkansas #4

The Crazy Met
77.1018UMASS vs URI TicketsHOTLNE::BRIANWed Nov 30 1994 16:4511
    On Thursday January 19 UMASS plays URI at the Providence civic center.
    
    Tickets can be obtained thru the URI Athletic Dept by calling
    (401) 792-2368.  
    
    A Visa or MC will reserve the tickets and they will be mailed out
    sometime in December.  The cost of the tickets is $10.00
    
    
    Brian
    
77.1019MROA::RSCHOTTFri Dec 02 1994 15:5013
         So, what did you Boston Globe readers out there think of
    Mark Blaudschun's column regarding UMASS' stated intention of upgrading
    its football program from 1AA to 1A?
    
         While I agree with his conclusion, I thought I was reading the
    biased diatribe spouted by the likes Russ Schott, Joe Garbarino, Steve
    Nazzaro, Mike Barry, Tony Barbieri et al, regarding their respective alma
    maters, and not the supposedly objective work of a professional
    newspaperman.  I detected a noticeable attitude in his column, that
    would do any Sports Noter proud!  I hereby propose that we put Mark up
    on the ENet, so we all can have at it in Note's 23 and 77!
    
    Russ
77.1020Me and ACC-Crisp together?!?!?!?!?TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 Baby - unbelievable!!!Fri Dec 02 1994 17:375
    The latest rumor I heard from a usually reliable source is that the ACC
    has approached UMass about joining its conference in 1998, provided
    that UMass is competing at the Division 1 level in football.
    
    NAZZ
77.1021WMOIS::BALL_KFri Dec 02 1994 17:515
    I heard that something to that effect on a springfield/UMASS radio
    program as i was driving back from NYS after the thankgiving holiday.  
    I attributed it to wishful thinking on UMASS's part.  
    
    It would be great though... and the Big East folks would hate it
77.1022CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldFri Dec 02 1994 18:577
 I'm a big east fan and I'd love to see it. To me it would mean that UMASS
 would probably play the Centrum more than once a year and I'd get to see
 some top notch team. I'm all for it. Of course I have no qualms with the A-10
 either I think it's an excellent league.

 mike
77.1023new one on meHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 02 1994 18:5712
Nazz,

Come in outta that cold up there! ;-).

Absolutely no way, as in never, will UMass be asked to join the ACC.
While Massachusetts does indeed have a_Atlantic Coast, the nexted school
to be added to the league is expected to be Florida. Others mentioned
include Kentucky but I aint never heard nothing about UMass.

Maybe Wake wants a little competition for the football cellar? ;-)

TTom
77.1024ACC ? No. Oblivion next.USCTR1::BARRYFri Dec 02 1994 20:0526
    
    To be honest, I was more concerned with the story that UConn is
    planning to go 1-A. I'm not sure that thay would be competitive any
    time soon in the Big East football conference. Having another Temple
    in the conference wouldn't help.
    
    
    Biased diatribe ? You've got the wrong guy !!! (I heard that UMass was
    going to join the Ivy League....honest.)
    
    
    The real issue and the real worry for UMass is what will happen with
    the Atlantic 10. The trend is toward larger "super" conferences. Yours
    is shrinking. That's why the talk of 1-A and the ACC. Right now, UMass
    and GW have top notch coaches and programs. Chaney's antics have hurt
    Temple (would you send your son to play for that nut?). What happens
    when the conference gets smaller? Calipari and Jarvis move on.
    
    UMass will go back to the days of yesteryear.....
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
77.102524661::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingSat Dec 03 1994 11:1310
    re .1019:
    
    I read the article last night and saw no such bias.  I thought it was
    well balanced and specifically praises UMASS about the basketball
    program.  Blaudshun basically asked why UMASS couldn't excel at 2
    sports, BUT AT 2 DIFFERENT LEVELS (1A and 1AA)?
    
    What's the beef?
    
    Mark.
77.1026TLE::PHILLIPSSat Dec 03 1994 20:407
Uconn has only voted to continue investigating going to 1-A. They still need
a sound financial plan (including a stadium). From what I've seen, I think 
they are dragging their feet and will wait until the last minute to cave in and
admit they just don't have the $ to do it. 

Which will make BC very happy.
77.1027Kansas 81 UMASS 75MROA::RSCHOTTMon Dec 05 1994 11:4232
         Well, I'm bummed out .......... but not that bummed out. (though I
    wouldn't have minded if the UM'ies had hung around on top for a week or
    two;^)!  Being number one is a distraction, and puts a bullseye
    squarely upon one's back, and frankly, I don't think UMASS is quite
    good enough to stand up to either scrutiny, just right now!
    
         The game with Kansas was an exact, carbon copy of last year. 
    UMASS does not match up well with the Kansas team.  Kansas lost 
    Steve Woodbury and _?_ Scott to graduation, and replaced
    them with Raef Lafrentz and Jerod Haase.  Like last year, Ostertag
    caused all sorts or problems inside for UMASS, and Jacque Vaughn and
    Haase outplayed UMASS' backcourt.  And last but not least, Roy Williams
    (one of the top three coaches in college hoop IMHO) outcoached John
    Calipari.  For UMASS, Roe again had a big game, but Camby was a no show
    (he missed last year's Kansas game with an injury), and the UMASS back
    court didn't get the job done.
    
         Despite all that, there were some positive things.  First, Lou
    Roe demonstrated an ability to drift outside and hit the 15' jumper.
    UMASS did force Kansas into a large number of turnovers.  And despite
    not playing well, it was a two point game late into the second half,
    and a three point game with 2 minutes left.  The UM'ies showed they
    could hang around, even while playing poorly.  Kansas made the plays in
    the second half, and quite simply, UMASS didn't.
    
         Next up, Pittsburg at Mullins, and then the rematch with the
    Maryland Terps, in Baltimore.
    
    Russ
    
    - Raef Lafrentz at 6'11" could play on my team anytime!
                                                    
77.1028UMass/KansasUSCTR1::BARRYMon Dec 05 1994 11:5714
    
    
    Russ,
    
    Didn't see the game (I was coaching my daughter's team). The reports
    indicate that Kansas did to UMass what UMass did to Arkansas. Getting
    to loose balls first, rebounding, etc. 
    
    Not sure what you mean when you say Calipari was outcoached.
    
    Roe sure looks like an early first round pick, though.
    
    
    Mike
77.1029It was nice being #1 for weekTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 Baby - unbelievable!!!Mon Dec 05 1994 12:2119
    I'm not sure what you mean by Coach Cal getting outcoached either.
    I thought UMass was outhustled, which shouldn't have happened against a
    larger, slower team.  I agree with Russ that this was almost an exact
    carbon copy of lasted year's game, and that UMass does not match up
    well with Kansas.
    
    There are two substitutions I might have made if I were coach - get
    Travieso and Norville into the game more.  Norville to bulk up against
    the inside strength of Kansas and Travieso to see if someone could hit
    an outisde shot.  Padilla was terrible Saturday (2-9), as was Dingle
    (1-6) and Camby (1-7).  The best thing about this game is that it might
    keep Camby in school for his junior year.  There is no way he'll be
    ready for the NBA unless he gets stronger.
    
    If UMass was going to lose an early season game, this was the one to
    lose.  I'll be at the Mullins Center Wednesday to see how they rebound
    from this defeat.
    
    NAZZ
77.1030TNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Mon Dec 05 1994 12:253
    Guess I had to change the p-name.
    
    NAZZ
77.1031no game planHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Dec 05 1994 13:5210
Put me in the camp of UMass being outcoached.

Mostly, this is based upon any appearance of a game plan by UMass. What
we saw was a complete inability to do anything about the Kansas size in
the middle and on offense it was dribble down and gun it.

Still a good game as was the UCLA-Kentucky game where the Bruins won by 1
from 2 FTs at the virtual end of the game. But that's another topic...

TTom
77.1032but average Camby game = winMROA::RSCHOTTMon Dec 05 1994 15:0124
    Re: 77.1029
    
    Nazz:
    
         I base my statement on Williams "outcoaching" Calipari on three
    things:
    
    1.  Gameplan - Coach Cal had the tapes of last year game, but somehow
        or other Kansas was able to do exactly the same sorts of things and
        be successful with them.
    2.  Execution - I agree this is mostly the players responsibility, but
        Kansas came in with freshmen, softmores and a transfer (plus the
        senior Ostertag) and outexecuted the more experienced team.
    3.  The back door play - Kansas went to this play a half dozen times
        in the second half, and was successful just about every single
        time.  It seems to me that Coach Cal might have detected a pattern
        there, and devised a solution.
    4.  The Travieso factor - Coach Cal seems to have taken a "Bill
        Parcells-ish stance on Travieso.  Keep him on the bench.  Inside
        of three minutes, when they needed points, I would have gone to a
        three guard lineup, and had Travieso in there to hoist them up.
    
    Russ
    
77.1033I count like the UMASS hoopstersMROA::RSCHOTTMon Dec 05 1994 15:032
         Sorry, that was four things, wasn't it :^)!!
    
77.1034BIGQ::MCKAYMon Dec 05 1994 15:129
    How many games does Duke have to lose before they drop in the coaches
    polls.  They were 6th, lose to UCONN and stay at 6.  
    
    UMASS beats Arkansas and 1 week later is ranked below them......
    
    I wish I could vote! and that wasn't me who gave UCONN a first place
    vote.
    
    jimbo
77.1035watch outHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoMon Dec 05 1994 15:146
Duke screwed this all up by beating Illinios.

Watch out for Duke. They've got 3 freshman who are going to be college
stars. They got a couple of returning sophmores who are very steady.

TTom
77.1036Remembering Dick GarberMROA::RSCHOTTThu Dec 08 1994 11:1738
         The UMASS Sports community lost one of its most respected members
    yesterday with the passing of HOF Lacrosse Coach Dick Garber.  After
    the Erving-Skinner-Pitino years of the early '70's, and before John
    Calipari's arrival on the scene, Dick Garber was THE coach and ran THE
    program on the UMASS campus.  It was fitting that while every other
    team went by the name Redmen and then Minutemen, the UMASS lacrosse
    team was known only as Garber's Gorillas.
    
         During the '60's and '70's, Garber's teams competed at the highest
    levels without scholarship players, and more than held their own. 
    During the '80's, the program was upgraded to include scholarships and
    UMASS became a perennial top ten team.  Garber was unfortunate to have
    his best teams during the years the Gait brothers played at Syracuse.
    Despite some close hard fought games, Syracuse always emerged the
    winner.  During one of those years, after Syracuse defeated either
    Hopkins or North Carolina in the National Championship game, the
    Syracuse Coach stated that while the opposition in the Championship
    game was tough, they didn't present the problems for his team that
    Garber's UMASS team did.
    
         After Nazz and I heard the news at last night's Pitt
    basketball game, we both remarked that we had crossed paths with Garber
    while students at UMASS.  In my case, I took a course from Garber to
    fulfill a PE requirement.  I remember him as soft spoken and dignified
    man, yet with a powerful presence.  A class act, all the way around.
    
         One lacrosse game against Syracuse during the Gait Brothers years
    stands out in my mind.  UMASS jumped out to a 6 to 1 lead.  In an 
    obviously planned reaction, the UMASS students had lifted thousands
    of oranges from the cafeterias, and showered the field with oranges
    during a time out.  Garber took the field microphone and said that if
    one more orange came out of the stands, that he would forfeit the game
    then and there, and implored the fans to show some sportsmanship.
    
         UMASS lacrosse hasn't been the same since the day he retired.
    
    Russ 
                       
77.1037A class guy all the wayTNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Thu Dec 08 1994 12:5610
    Dick Garber was the faculty advisor for our dorm when we were doing
    some typical '60s liberal fundraising and volunteering stuff.  He made
    sure we did things the right way with a kind word or two and a nudge in
    the right direction.  For an old fossil with a short haircut, we all
    thought he was a pretty cool guy.  The class he showed us carried over
    to his teams, which always played hard and represented UMass well.
    
    He will be missed.
    
    NAZZ
77.1038Willard has lots of work to do at PittILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersThu Dec 08 1994 13:2711
	The Minutemen spanked the Pitt Panthers pretty good Wednesday
	night in the UMass official home opener.

	The game got plenty of coverage on the Boston TV stations late
	news and even nationally - Edgar Padilla got the CNN Play of Day
	for his blown two handed reverse slam. They also showed him getting 
	chewed out by Calipari after the attempt. :-)

	UMass now 2-1 with another top ten team (Maryland) up next ...

	Vinny
77.1039UMASS-MarylandMROA::RSCHOTTFri Dec 09 1994 12:3025
         Should be a very interesting game on Saturday, as 2 and 1 UMASS
    takes on 6 and 1 Maryland in Baltimore.  Last year UMASS beat the Terps
    during the regular season 94-80, and were of course soundly thumped
    in Wichita during the NCAA's, 95-87.  On Saturday, Maryland will have
    the partisan crowd but UMASS should have the revenge factor in their
    favor.
    
         In the March game, Maryland after being down by five at the half,
    scored 57 POINTS in the second, and ended up shooting 67% from the
    field and 80% from three point land, in a remarkable outside shooting
    clinic.  Exree Hipp (19 pts) and Johnny Rhodes, with a near triple
    double were the stars for Maryland.  Camby had a monster game for UMASS
    with 32 points and 10 boards!
    
         The key to this game in my mind for UMASS, will be what happens
    on the perimeter.  The UMASS guards were abysmal in Wichita, and only
    Mike Williams played well in Springfield.  If Simpkins, Rhodes and Hipp
    have their way, UMASS will be in trouble.
    
         An interesting sidebar will be Donta Bright's return to his
    hometown, and the matchup between Bright and his cousin and high school
    teammate Keith Booth.  Bright is UMASS' most improved player, this
    season.
    
    Russ
77.1040Camby has to step up - he hasn't so far this yearTNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Fri Dec 09 1994 13:266
    I disagree Russ.  The key to the game tomorrow is which Marcus Camby
    shows up - the one who torched Joe Smith for 32 points in the NCAAs
    lasted year or the one who shot 1-7 against Kansas last weekend.  If
    Camby puts in another stinkeroo, there's no way UMass can win.
    
    NAZZ
77.1041TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinFri Dec 09 1994 13:4011
    
    
    	The Terps tuned up by destroying Colgate last night by something
    like 50 points. Smith was lucky to not get tossed, and thus suspended
    for the UMASS game. Smith hit a Colgate kid in the chops with an elbow
    (looked to be inadvertant to me), the Colgate kid retaliated, and a few
    shoves were exchanged. Smith got a 'T' and Colgate got tossed...
    
    
    JimH
    
77.1042point-counterpointMROA::RSCHOTTFri Dec 09 1994 13:4414
    But Nazz, in the Springfield game the Smith-Camby matchup was 22-9 in
    favor of Smith, and UMASS still won going away because Roe and Dingle
    picked up the slack in the front court, and the backcourts more or less
    neutralized each other.  In Wichita, the Maryland backcourt outscored
    UMASS 32-20, and Maryland shot treys at an 80% clip.  UMASS
    outrebounded Maryland, and had a decided edge in offensive rebounds,
    but to no avail.  I expect Roe, Camby, Bright, Dingle, Norville et al,
    to have an overall edge in the front court tomorrow, even if one of the 
    above has an off game.
    
    I do agree that a sleepwalking Marcus Camby, won't help matters though ;^)!
    
    Russ
                                                                          
77.1043cut that out!HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 09 1994 13:456
Yeah, I don't wanna see Smith acting like Rasheed Wallace. 

If'n Maryland can focus on the game, they have enough talent and a good
enough coach to go real far.

TTom
77.1044Terps on Top!ODIXIE::ZOGRANOne hand clappingFri Dec 09 1994 16:2110
    Not seeing much of my Terps this year (except for the Maui Classic), I
    gotta believe that if they can get hot from the perimeter they're going
    to win.  In the games I managed to see last year it appeared that when
    they started throwing up clunkers, they lost.  One person (Smith) can't
    do it all, and I think they have a tendency to force it to him when the
    shooting goes south.  And if I am not mistaken Smith is as capable as
    anyone of going into the tank on any given game.  Lets just hope it's not
    tommorrow.:-)
    
    UMDan 
77.1045good starters, but ...HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 09 1994 16:247
Maryland's starting 5 of Hipp and Booth at forward, Smith in the middle
and Simpkins and Rhodes in the backcourt can play with anyone.

Now, throw in clunkers, mental lapses, tanking, etc., and they can
probably lose to almost anyone.

TTom
77.1046Not a great benchODIXIE::ZOGRANOne hand clappingFri Dec 09 1994 16:347
    The bench is another area that concerns me.  In the game against ASU I
    am not sure if Smith took a breather all game.
    
    Really need to find the Terps publication that someone gave me last
    year and get a subscription!
    
    UMDan
77.1047FRETZ::HEISERGrace changes everythingFri Dec 09 1994 17:381
    ASU *TROUNCED* them!
77.1048try da Poop SheetHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Dec 09 1994 17:4213
Even though Chris Knorr recommended it, I subscribe to the Poop Sheet and
it does a pretty good job of reviewing Maryland and the rest of the ACC.
It's particularly good on data, like who's who in recruiting, who signed,
etc.

It's not so hot it the subjective parts like let's see how good Duke is.
It is, after all, published in Chapel Hill. 

I will say this about it: it's far better than that fascist rag "Carolina
Blue" which is still talking about how great it was that the Heels won it
all a couple of years ago.

TTom
77.1049UMASS comes up BIG!!CNTROL::CHILDSTheresa's Sound WorldMon Dec 12 1994 11:064
 What a game, what a team. You think Maryland's shooting foul shots right now?

 mike
77.1050Still #12ODIXIE::ZOGRANOne hand clappingMon Dec 12 1994 11:519
    UMass - 18 points off of treys, UMD - 3 points.  Only saw the last 15
    minutes of the game (swim team duties), so how come UMass had so many
    people in foul trouble?  Looked like my boys lost their composure a
    little at the end.  Oh well, it was a good game.  At least some of the
    pre-ACC matchups are against quality opponents this year.  Maybe teams
    are geting the message that going into conference play 11-0 against
    Creampuff U doesn't mean that much anymore (except for Georgetown).
    
    UMDan                                                  
77.1051Hard fought win on the road!MROA::RSCHOTTMon Dec 12 1994 11:5123
         Some interesting stats on the UMASS-Maryland game:
    
                               UMASS             Maryland
    
    		Shooting %    45% (30/63)        37% (23/63)
    		3 pt. %       50% (6/12)          7% (1/14)
                FT %          76% (19/25)        61% (27/44)
                Reb.          41                 48 (with a big edge on the
                                                     offensive boards,
                                                     though with Roe only
                                                     playing 18 minutes, I
                                                     guess this stat isn't
                                                     surprising!)
    
         Also, it was very interesting that in a big game, involving
    relatively evenly matched teams, both with reputations for playing
    pressure defense and as tough rebounders, that one team would
    shoot 19 more free throws than the other.  This figure is misleading
    in that Maryland was forced to foul during the final 90 seconds, and
    UMASS shot 8 free throws during this time!
    
    Russ
        
77.1052Another congrats to UMass.USCTR1::BARRYMon Dec 12 1994 11:5712
    Good game for UMass. I saw only parts of it (my daughter's b-ball team
    again), but it looked as if Maryland was never going to win. Camby's
    presence in the middle had the Maryland guys altering shots all day.
    
    I do think it's time that you guys apologized to The Globe, though. In
    the past week every issue had something about UMass. They even sent Dan
    Shaughnessy to the Pitt game, had Ryan do a nice write-up, and even had
    a nice article about the Lacrosse coach who passed away.
    
    Bottom line: Get results, get coverage.
    
    
77.1053WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountMon Dec 12 1994 12:2111
    
    
         G'Town has now played Arkansas, Depaul and Memphis st, this year
    plus the BE is heads and shoulders above the A10.
    
    
    So as Dennis Leary says!   "GET OFF THERE BACK"
    
    
    
    Chap
77.1054A10 "heads and shoulders">BEMROA::RSCHOTTMon Dec 12 1994 12:3817
    Re: 1053
    
    "..... plus the BE is head and shoulders above the A10!
    
    fact:  GWU goes to the Carrier Dome to play the "Cuse" and wins
    
    fact:  West Virginia goes to Pittsburg and wins
    
    fact:  UMASS beats Pittsburg at Mullins by 28, a differential which
           could have been 50+ had Calipari not called off the horses
    
    fact:  URI, picked to finish last in the A-10, loses to Providence
           by 4
    
    Yup, looks like a "heads and shoulders" advantage to me!
    
    Russ                                                   
77.1055TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinMon Dec 12 1994 12:5522
    
    
    
    >I do think it's time that you guys apologized to The Globe, though. In
    >the past week every issue had something about UMass. They even sent Dan
    >Shaughnessy to the Pitt game, had Ryan do a nice write-up, and even had
    >a nice article about the Lacrosse coach who passed away.
    
    
    	Yes, and did you read Shauhnessy's condescending article on the
    UMASS-Pitt game the next day? Including the bit about everybody asking
    him to "write something nice about Umass (how am I doing?)"
    
    	Dan clearly had to grit his teeth and hold his nose to write
    about Umass in a positive light. If and when Umass stumbles this
    year, Shaugnessy will lead the bashers, with glee....
    
    
    JimH (not a UMass alum...)
    
    
    
77.1056More Globe fawning on UMass....USCTR1::BARRYMon Dec 12 1994 13:207
    
    
    I forgot to mention that there was also a generally favorable article
    saying that UMass was monitoring the grades of its athletes, making the
    problem seem like an aberration.
    
    
77.1057WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MStabler&gt;Bradshaw Tatum&gt;BlountMon Dec 12 1994 13:338
    
    
        Yup thats telling Me Pittsburgh sure is the Cream in the BE!!!
    
       By the way nice win against Richmond yesterday GWU Not!!!!!!!!
    
    
    Chap
77.1058"Refuse to lose" is much more than a slogan to UMassTNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Mon Dec 12 1994 14:3323
    Let's get back to the game last Saturday.  I'm sure many of you felt
    that with Roe fouled out, Camby and Kellogg in foul trouble (both of
    them eventually fouled out, too), and Maryland taking the lead with
    almost five minutes left that UMass didn't stand much of a chance in
    front of that frenzied Maryland crowd.  But this UMass team is a true
    team in every sense of the word, and when Calipari needed big
    performances from his bench, he got it.
    
    Mike Williams kept his stupid plays to a minimum, penetrated well, and
    hit his shots.  Donta Bright proved once again that he's a big-time
    player.  Dana Dingle stepped up when the team needed it.  Edgar Padilla
    may have been the best guard on the floor at both ends of the court.
    And freshman Inus Norville played like a savvy veteran.
    
    This was a tremendous win for UMass, overcoming some atrocious
    officiating, a hostile crowd, and perhaps the best player in the
    country in Joe Smith.  The Minutemen kept their poise down the stretch,
    make their free throws, and showed that they are a legitimate Final
    Four contender.
    
    NAZZ
    
    
77.1059UMass/GlobeSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Dec 12 1994 15:4825
      I was only able to see the game since the time Maryland crawled
      to within 1 and right after took the lead.
    
      UMass definitely took over and did what they had to do, BUT I
      felt that everything seemed to go their way during the critical
      stretch.  Case in point was Mike Williams throwing up an air
      ball and Bright catching it and putting in a reverse layup.
      Another were a couple long rebounds that they got.
    
      I just think that there was a critical stretch where the bounce 
      of the ball went UMass' way.
    
      I can't help but wonder how Roe could accumulate 5 fouls in
      18 minutes.  Did he try to foul out or something?
    
      Speaking of officiating...I did catch the non foul on the steal
      of the ball from Williams.  Unbelievable how that wasn't called.
    
      On the Globe:
      Its my take that the recent Globe articles are in response to
      people complaining about their previous lack of coverage and thus
      (without said complaint) it would follow that they might not 
      have responded as they did.
    
                                                     Tony
77.1060Bucknell?WMOIS::BALL_KWed Dec 14 1994 11:223
    Did I hear correctly (last night on ESPN) that Bucknell was joining the 
    A10 ...I'm hoping I mis-heard... what a poor addition to the
    conference.
77.1061MROA::RSCHOTTWed Dec 14 1994 11:474
         I think I read that Fordham will be joining the A-10 next season,
    and that Depaul and Dayton have been approached about joining.
    
    Russ
77.1062CAMONE::WAYI'll miss you, Rak, my friendWed Dec 14 1994 12:004
>         I think I read that Fordham will be joining the A-10 next season,
>    and that Depaul and Dayton have been approached about joining.
    
That's what I heard on the FAN last night....  Except for football....
77.1063WMOIS::BALL_KWed Dec 14 1994 12:026
    
    Dayton and Depaul would be great additions.
    As well as anybody from the Great Midwest or Metro, I'd also take Manhatten,
    Siena, Richmond, Old Dominion, Lasalle, James Madison, Northeastern,
    etc..  but I don't understand Fordham
    
77.1064Good for the school and the leagueTNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Wed Dec 14 1994 13:078
    Fordham desperately wants out of the wussy Patriot league, which
    doesn't give scholarships.  The old Fordham alums remember the glory
    days of the 50s and want to reach those heights again.  They have an
    excellent coach in Nick Macarchuk, and used to play St. Joe's, Temple,
    and the Bonnies all the time.  For the A-10, it gives them a presence
    in NYC, something the league has always wanted.
    
    NAZZ
77.1065No Comparison (year in year out)STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Wed Dec 14 1994 15:1417
      I sure hope the A10 does get stronger.  My guess is that Temple
      won't be much this year and even though GWU had a good win
      (can't remember against who) I just don't see the A10 experience
      doing much of anything to prepare UMass for the tournament.
    
      I know the A10 has had some solid years, but not this year and
      not year in year out.  The ACC, Big 10, and SEC (I think SEC, 
      but not positive) just pummel each other year in year out and
      give teams an experience that the A10 won't come close to giving
      UMass this year.
    
      Compare what UMass will play against to some team going to Indiana,
      Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State, Wisconsin, Purdue, Minnesota
      or North Carolina, Viginia, Maryland, Duke, Georgia Tech, etc. etc.
      No comparison.
    
                                                      Tony
77.1066Top quality teams may be down, but not by that muchTNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're #5 Baby; that's not too bad!Wed Dec 14 1994 19:0215
    I will definitely agree re. the Big Ten and the ACC, as much as I hate
    to admit it about the latter conference.  The SEC, however, is a
    different story.  Their bottom echelon teams are pretty weak.  The SEC
    has some great teams at the top this season (Kentucky, Florida,
    Arkansas), and that is usually the case every year.  But that kind of
    quality doesn't filter down.
    
    The A-10 will be down slightly this season, as Westy Virginia is weak
    for the first time I can remember.  But Temple is going to win 20+
    games, St. Joe's is very, very good, GW can surprise people, and both
    St. Bonaventure and URI are improved.  The addition of Xavier and
    Fordham will more than make up for losing weak sisters Rutgers and West
    Virginia to the Big Least.
    
    NAZZ
77.1067MROA::RSCHOTTThu Dec 22 1994 11:4123
         A couple of interesting items on UMASS B-ball in this morning's
    Pravda (oops I mean the Globe, sorry!):
    
    - Talk has begun once again regarding UMASS playing BC next December
      in the Shawmut Center.  
    
    - UMASS is off to France between Christmas and New Years, to play in
      a tournament with three European Teams.  Calipari says that he was
      initially reluctant to schedule the trip due to the travel time
      required.  According to him, he got back to the promoters and said
      that if they put his team on the Concorde, UMASS would play in the
      Tournament.  The promoters agreed, and so the team is off to Paris.
    
    - UMASS' current senior class of Lou Roe, Mike Williams and Derek
      Kellogg was originally a quintet.  Scott Drapeau and Jerome Malloy
      originally enrolled at UMASS but later transferred out for personal
      reasons.  Drapeau, is now keying a resurgence at UNH, and led the
      Wildcats to an upset win last night over Miami (Ohio) with 34 points
      and 21 rebounds.  Malloy now plays at Jacksonville, and last night
      his team upset Top 10 Florida, with Malloy hitting 4 treys.  Not
      a bad recruiting class.
    
    Russ
77.1068METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleThu Dec 22 1994 13:179
> that if they put his team on the Concorde, UMASS would play in the

what BS. Travel to Paris is overnight, not missing all that much; coming
back you leave at 2PM (or whatever) and get back 4 or 5 local time.
Concord means he has to go through NY or DC and the connection time 
almsot begins to make this a give.

The Crazy Met
77.1069Another tempest in a teapotTNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're 4th and movin' up!Thu Dec 22 1994 13:3910
    Most of UMass' travel goes through New York.  More flights, better
    connections.  Bradley just doesn't have enough flight times.  NY is
    only 2 1/2 hours from the UMass campus.
    
    NAZZ
    
    PS - I wondered what happened to Jerome Malloy.  Hope he has his
    drinking problem under control.  He was a deadly long-range shooter
    when his head was on straight.
    
77.1070Don't I have an aunt in Margate(ailing)AKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Dec 28 1994 17:244
    I saw where UMass has a game scheduled in Atlantic City.  We were
    joking about the pool-94 "banquet" being held there but having a game
    there intrigues me and starts me thinking of intricate k-pass
    strategies.
77.1071I meant to get some info hereAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberWed Dec 28 1994 17:297
    What I meant was, Russ, Nazz!  Any details on this game in A-city.
    
    Date, sold-out or not?  Interest?
    
    
    Ironically with all my B.C. loyalties UMass has a greater rooting
    interest for me (yes I know, vv would never hold).
77.1072On the Boardwalk in Atlantic City ....TNPUBS::NAZZAROWe're 4th and movin' up!Thu Dec 29 1994 12:505
    All I know is that's it's a week from Saturday against LaSalle.
    
    I'll see what I can find out about ticket availability.
    
    NAZZ
77.1073SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Thu Dec 29 1994 13:558
    
    	Today's paper says that Umass lost all of there games played
    in Europe. The last one to an Italian team 102-95. Camby and Roe
    had big games. An Italian player scored 43 in a physical game.
    	Calipari says the games were good experience. All the other
    teams were professional teams.
    
    Ron 
77.1074MROA::RSCHOTTWed Jan 04 1995 11:3627
         In a game that was put away early in the first half, UMASS
    prevailed over the West Virginia Mountaineers, 95-65, in Springfield
    last night.  The game "featured" one of the longest "garbage times"
    on record, as the UMASS third string, played most of the second half.
    WVU started a lineup of two freshmen, a Prop 48 soph, a junior and
    senior, whose tallest member was barely 6'7".  Judging by last night's
    performance, it was hard to see how West Virginia could have entered
    the game at 4 and 3, with wins over Ohio State and Pittsburg to their
    credit.
    
         For UMASS, John Calipari had to be pleased with the play of Carmelo 
    Travieso and Tyrone Weeks.  Travieso hit 5 long range three pointers in
    the first half, and Weeks finished with a double/double, consisting of
    10 points and 11 boards.  Inus Norville pitched in with a solid 6
    point, 10 rebound, and 3 blocked shot effort as well.  Overall, UMASS
    blocked an incredible 20 shots in the game!
    
         In the bad news department, both Andre Burks for UMASS and Zain
    Shaw for West Virginia went down with knee injuries.  Burks was able to
    eventually get up, and jog off the court, and it was thought that the 
    injury was no worse than a strain.  Shaw, WVU's leading scorer going
    into last night, was carried off the court however.
        
          Thursday, it's on to A10-Great Midwest Challenge, where UMASS
    will play 8 and 0, St. Louis. 
    
    Russ
77.10752-Point FavoritesLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Jan 05 1995 18:405
      UMass only a 2-point favorite at St Louis against the
      BILLIKENS.  What's a Billiken anyway?  Well, they are
      8-0 and you gotta love that little conference!
    
      If they win, they'll be #2 (as if it really matters).
77.1076aint it like a pelican?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Jan 05 1995 19:020
77.1077FXTROT::ALLEMANGThu Jan 05 1995 19:043
Actually, I think it is a little kewpie-doll-like thing that was
created specifically to be their mascot.  Strange.
77.1078seen one lately?HBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoThu Jan 05 1995 19:086
Has any one determined what a Red Storm looks like?

I know this is the UMass topic but you guys sound like you know something
about the Big East, too ;-)

TTom
77.1079UMass headed back to #1?LJSRV2::KNIPSTEINFri Jan 06 1995 11:519
    The UMass win over St Louis, coupled with losses by the #1, #2 and #3
    teams should put UMass back at #1 - provided they beat LaSalle
    tomorrow.  (#6 UConn also won, so it could be possible to have UMass
    and UConn running 1-2)
    
    As for what a Billiken is, the mascot is a goat so it may be derived
    from billy goat.
    
    Steve
77.1080true triviaFXTROT::ALLEMANGFri Jan 06 1995 12:4810
I'm a little fuzzy on this, but I seem to recall that a Billiken is
a doll created by someone at the university and named after Bill *someone*.
Sounds weird... but heard the story many years ago.  Maybe it was faux.

I wouldn't doubt that after the Billiken was created, someone thought it
would be neat to get a Billy Goat to run around and crap on the floor at
athletic events.

Greg
77.1081Donta Bright got a 3.0 this fall - didn't see that in the GlobeTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass sez: See you in Seattle!Fri Jan 06 1995 14:5720
    Andre Burks is out for the year with an ACL injury.  UMass will apply
    for a medical redshirt for him.  Don't know what the cutoff is for how
    many gamesyou can play in before a medical redshirt is allowed, but
    Burks got hurt in UMass' 7th game.
    
    Very impressive win lasted night against a St. Louis team that kept
    battling back with a ton of threes in the last few minutes.  Great FT
    shooting by UMass (never thought I'd say that!) kept them reasonably
    comfortably in front.  The win was all the more impressive considering
    that it was accomplished without star center Marcus Camby, who was
    attneding the funeral of his grandmother.
    
    On another topic, I've been waiting all week for the front page story
    in the Boston Globe on the academic results from the first semester
    for the UMass basketball students.  Funny, there hasn't been a word
    about how well they did.  Where is that "source" getting the story
    now?  Could it be that the UMass players did well this past semester,
    so that it is not considered newsworthy? 
    
    NAZZ
77.1082Great game by red/oops minutemenAKOCOA::BREENIt was in the bleak DecemberFri Jan 06 1995 15:2415
    One thing I did see in the Globe was when both UMass and BC played the
    same night that UMass got top billing though both were on the front
    page.
    
    UMass played a great game last night against a tough team.  Padilla
    stood out and Williams was very steady and consistent.  Camby was
    obviously needed as board action was intense.  Roe has taken his game
    another level.  Didn't see Meier all night even though Camby was
    out.(?)
    
    Temple looked pretty good in the opener but Mass now has to be
    considered the front-runners for ncaa championship.
    
    It's nice to be able to root comfortably for both Mass teams, feel bad
    for any that can't root after one of the two gets knocked out in ncaas.
77.1083MROA::RSCHOTTMon Jan 09 1995 11:3921
         UMASS turned in a workmanlike if uninspired performance against
    LaSalle on Saturday, with a 87-64 win in Atlantic City.  Lou Roe came
    out "overjuiced" in his first game in his home town since high school,
    got in early foul trouble, then couldn't hit the ocean from the beach,
    and ended up with a grand total of two points!  Norville and Weeks
    stepped up their games in place of Lou, and combined for 21 points.
    The next big game will be Saturday in the Mullins Center against 8 and
    1, Penn.  In between, a visit to St.Bonaventure on Tuesday and Rutgers
    comes to Amherst on Thursday.
    
         The UMASS Hockey Team, finally picked up their first Hockey East
    win, with a 5-3 victory over Boston College on Saturday Night.  They
    had lost the Friday Night matchup with the Eagles, 8-4 at Chesnut Hill.
    Despite their record, the second year team has featured solid defense
    and goal tending.  Their problem has been that they can put only one line 
    on the ice that has any reasonable chance of scoring at the Division 1, 
    Hockey East level.  If Coach Mallen can recruit a couple of snipers
    this winter, the UM'ies should be a lot more competitive next season.
    
    Russ
        
77.1084HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 09 1995 12:1414
                                      11111
                                     111111
                                    1111111
                                   11111111
                                       1111
                                       1111
                                       1111
                                       1111
                                       1111
                                       1111
                                       1111
                                       1111
                                   111111111111
                                   111111111111
77.1085#1 ? I think so....USCTR1::BARRYMon Jan 09 1995 14:0911
    
    
    They certainly would get my vote, if I had one. Calipari's done a good
    job this year of keeping this team disciplined and focused, something
    that, I think, caused them problems last year in the NCAA's.
    
    Good job, good luck.
    
    BC Mike
    
    
77.1086Could it be that good grades = no story?TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Wed Jan 11 1995 14:124
    Still waiting on the front page article in the Globe onhow well the
    basketball players did academically in the fall semester.
    
    NAZZ
77.1087HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 11 1995 14:2127
RE          <<< Note 77.1086 by TNPUBS::NAZZARO "UMass - #1 again!!!" >>>

>    Still waiting on the front page article in the Globe onhow well the
>    basketball players did academically in the fall semester.
    
  To understand the press, think back to those black and white Superman
episodes of the late 50's. Think of Jimmy Olson standing in front of his
editor Perry White.

  White: Olson, you call this a story!

  Olson: Well I ... Well ...

  White: Olson, If a dog bites a man that's not news, but if a man bites a
         dog that is news. Now GO - GET - ME - A - STORY!

  Olson: Right Chief

  White: AND DON'T CALL ME CHIEF!


               "BASKETBALL TEAM GET'S GOOD GRADES"
                      No action expected

is not exactly the type of thing that stops the presses or sells papers.

  George
77.1088So what would happen if Uconn played Umass, I'm not so sure anymore.TLE::PHILLIPSWed Jan 11 1995 14:262
...but I'd like to see it!
77.1089CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Jan 11 1995 14:3110
It'd be a great matchup, no doubt.

As a UCONN fan I'd predict a win over ZooMass, but I can solidly say it'd
be a great game.

Unfortunately, they're not scheduled this year, unless they somehow meet
in the NCAA tourney.....


'Saw
77.1090MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jan 11 1995 14:4114
    >> Still waiting on the front page article in the Globe on how well the
    >> basketball players did academically in the fall semester.
    
       Nazz, what do you want a continuing saga on the grades of UMass
       basketball players? A front page story every time their grades 
       go up, down or stay the same? The Globe was wrong to put names 
       with the grades but like the story or not it was news, but players
       getting passing grades shouldn't be and isn't. I'd be more int-
       erested to see what the players grades are in the spring semester
       when poor grades won't immediately effect eligibility. Meanwhile, 
       UMass was on the front of the Globe's sports section again the 
       other day. The perception that there's some bias towards BC at the 
       expense of UMass continues to take a beating. 
77.1091Whats up??ILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersWed Jan 11 1995 14:5220
	And instead of beating a dead horse (UMass athlets grades), why don't
	we talk about the #1 team in the country struggling against lowly
	St. Bonaventure??

	Lou Roe started the year against Arkansas like he was a College Player 
	of the Year candidate, totally outplaying Corliss Williamson, but as 
	of late he has been putting up some real sinkers (2 points against 
	LaSalle in his home town return, and another poor performance last 
	night). Whats up with Lou?
	
	And, in regards to the desired matchup of UConn and UMass, John
	Calipari was asked on his weekly television show 
	"If you could play any school in the country, which school would it be?"

	He answered that UMass plays most of the big boys (mentioned UNC,
	Syracuse, specifically among others) then said he would like to
	play Michigan, UCLA and Duke because of their tradition. I fully
	expected him to mention UConn, but he didn't.

	Vinny
77.1092Me wanna know what happen with Umass last nightAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeWed Jan 11 1995 15:0011
    Russ is obviously busy today or we'd have his account.  But Nazz got in
    with his daily "Where is the positive grade story?" note but nothing on
    last night's seat squirmer.
    
    Actually there is nothing to be ashamed of going into the Bonnie den
    and getting scared to death, they have the tradition and who knows
    maybe a few players (yes, that's what we'd like to know).
    
    And down here I will agree that a follow up by the Globe is in order. 
    Nazz have you called them?  Do you know the Boys?  Has UMASS sent the
    new grades down to Morrisey Blvd?
77.1093MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jan 11 1995 15:1211
    
     >>	And instead of beating a dead horse (UMass athlets grades), why don't
     >>	we talk about the #1 team in the country struggling against lowly
     >>	St. Bonaventure??
    
        Expect UMass to struggle against a lot of teams. Not because they
        aren't talented but because now they're circled in red on everyone's
        schedule. I saw the Oregon students storm the court the other night
        when the Ducks knocked off UCLA. Beating UMass would generate the
        same response from a lot of schools. Just another sign that UMass
        has arrived.
77.1094Other Possibilities TommySTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Wed Jan 11 1995 16:4810
      re: .1090
    
      Your last statement makes sense if one presumes that the Globe
      has not changed how it covers UMass.  I for one believe that
      the Globe has changed and thus your statement makes no sense
      whatsoever.
    
      I think enough people complained to the Globe and they responded.
      Plus of course being #1 in the country (or in the top 5) can modify
      how a paper covers a team.
77.1095They made the story what it was - they should follow upTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Wed Jan 11 1995 17:267
    The point that you are missing Tommy is that the Globe made the story
    of the grades into news, gave it a much more prominent play than it
    deserved, and now as a responsible newspaper must follow up the story. 
    Don't you think that if UMass came up with two or three ineligible
    players for the spring semester that they would be all over that?
    
    NAZZ
77.1096MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jan 11 1995 17:4816
    
    >> Your last statement makes sense if one presumes that the Globe
    >> has not changed how it covers UMass.  
    
       Why would anyone presume that the Globe hasn't changed how it covers
       a program from the the time when it was one of the worst in the
       country to the time when it was a very good program to now when
       it is one of the best in the country? Of course the coverage has
       changed. But if we're to believe the folks who try to paint UMass
       as the brilliant but neglected child prodigy then we should expect
       that UMass b-ball would continue to be buried somewhere in the back
       of the sports section next to high school wrestling stories and not
       on the front page of the sports section and the front page of the
       very paper itself. The fact is that their getting coverage because
       being #1 is _NEWS_. That the coverage may not always be favorable 
       comes with the turf.
77.1097Re-match with Syracuse ?USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jan 11 1995 18:0511
>Unfortunately, they're not scheduled this year, unless they somehow meet
>in the NCAA tourney.....

One of the sites for the first round games in the East is Albany, NY.
If UMass maintains at least #1 in the EAST, they should play there.
If UConn finishes #2 in the East (far less certain), they won't be
placed there, but shipped-out to another region.

UMass could have some very interesting Eastern Regional matchups,
with all of the good programs on this coast this year (I'd love
to see the #1 BE seed get #2 in the East, opposite UMass).
77.1098exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Jan 11 1995 18:3631
    
  >> The point that you are missing Tommy is that the Globe made the story
  >> of the grades into news, gave it a much more prominent play than it
  >> deserved, and now as a responsible newspaper must follow up the story. 

     I know what your point was, Nazz. I just don't agree. Being a fan of 
     Coach Cal's and UMass basketball, I was pretty disappointed in both 
     when I read the original Globe story. I disagreed with embarassing
     indvidual players by attaching names to the low grades but the fact
     that so many players were performing so poorly *was* news. I suspect
     we'll see a followup at some point but this isn't a problem with a 
     quick fix. In April or May we'll have a better but not complete 
     picture of just what's going on academically with the players named
     earlier. Right now, I'm sure the lure of staying academically eligible 
     for a team with championship potential is enough to make these players
     and the coaching staff toe the line. How they perform in April, May, 
     September, October and November when that lure isn't there will be 
     the real test.

  >> Don't you think that if UMass came up with two or three ineligible
  >> players for the spring semester that they would be all over that?
    
     And you don't think that they should be all over the story if two
     or three players like Camby, Bright and Williams are academically
     in eligible for the NCAA tournament? I can see how you would bristle
     at the coverage this story got but (again) players for one of the
     top programs taking and flunking classes of questionable merit is 
     news, players getting passing grades isn't and I don't think it
     should be. It should be expected.
     
    
77.1099MROA::RSCHOTTWed Jan 11 1995 19:1329
         Back to last night's game with the Bonnies.  I was in a meeting
    until 10 p.m., and came out to the car, dialed up WORC out of Wormtown,
    and was amazed that the team's were in OT.
    
         If last night's game says anything, its that the Minutemen can't
    put their game on autopilot, and expect to cruise by their remaining
    15 opponents.  They can be a special team, when they hustle, and
    rebound and play defense.  When they go through the motions, especially
    on the road, like any team they can be had.
    
         The Bonnie's appear to be an improved team, even after losing
    20 ppg scorer Harry Moore to graduation.   Third year coach Jim Baron
    has been successful in recruiting more athletic players the last two
    years, and it looks like UMASS won't be the only team they give
    trouble.
    
    Russ
    
    - I miss the UMASS-UCONN games, just as much or perhaps even more than
      matchups with BC, if only for the fact that the school's are
      traditional rivals in just about every other sport.  I watched a bit
      of the UCONN/St.John's game on Sunday, and was duly impressed.  I
      think UMASS would have a clear advantage on the boards, but otherwise
      would evenly matchup athletically.  UCONN is more successful with the 
      press than UMASS, however the Minutemen typically handle pressing defenses
      better than most, because all five players are adept ballhandlers.
    
      Regardless, the game would be a barnburner.  Where do I get tickets?
                                                       
77.1100SNARFOUTSRC::HEISERGrace changes everythingThu Jan 12 1995 15:011
77.1101ugh\BSS::MENDEZThu Jan 12 1995 15:083
    just when you thought it was safe to note again...out comes snarf
    jr.!!!
    
77.1102UMass depth and defense the differenceTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Fri Jan 13 1995 12:4920
    A satisfactory win last night over a program definitely on the
    downslide.  Rutgers has a couple of good seniors, one good junior, and
    one good freshman, but that's about it.  UMass played very sluggishly
    for most of the first half, with no outside shooting and terrible free
    throw shooting (for the first time that I can remember all year - they
    finished only 12-24).  Marcus Camby made their only shot outside 5 feet
    in the half - a baseline jumper in the final minute of the half.  Camby
    and (to an extent) Williams were the only guys who did anyhting in the
    half.
    
    Ironically, once Camby got tossed, UMass picked it up defensively and
    quickly went on a 14-2 run to put the game away.  Great defense by
    Carmelo Travieso on the guy who got Camby ejected paced the UMass
    spurt.  Willimas got his 1000th point at UMass near the end of the
    game.
    
    On another topice Camby got a 3.2 grade point for the fall semester,
    according to Sportscenter.  Haven't seen mention of it in the press!
    
    NAZZ
77.1103not bad, for localHBAHBA::HAASdingle lingoFri Jan 13 1995 13:129
>    On another topice Camby got a 3.2 grade point for the fall semester,
>    according to Sportscenter.  Haven't seen mention of it in the press!

Somehow, this info filtered down thised way. The local sports talk guys
mentioned it. But they're really into hoops. In fack, one of the guys,
Gerry Vallincourte is a buddy of Coach Cal, who's been on the show a
couple of times.

TTom
77.1104Tinted glasses ?IAMOK::BARRYFri Jan 13 1995 13:528
    
    "The guy who got Camby tossed..." Wasn't that Camby himself? He threw
    the punch. 
    
    A 3.2 GPA in the Psychology Of Sports Broadcasting is something to
    cherish.....
    
    
77.1105Carmelo TraveisoSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Jan 13 1995 17:055
      I have been unable to see most of the games, but it sounds
      like Carmelo Traveiso has improved bigtime over last year.
      How's he doing outside of hoisting up the 3's?
    
                                                  Tony
77.1106MROA::RSCHOTTFri Jan 13 1995 19:0313
         Travieso is getting more time this year because he is working
    much harder playing defense, and I assume, working harder in practice.
    If Calipari has one rule, it is to work hard on the defensive end.  The
    one thing I heard from outsiders who observed practice last year, is
    that Carmelo was Coach Cal's designated "whipping boy".
    
         He is UMASS' best long range shooter, and is critical to the team's
    post season success, IMHO.  Before XMAS he had a couple of DNP's and I
    was concerned that he may opt to transfer, maybe to a school such as
    Penn or Princeton. (he has the grades and SAT scores for either) 
    However with his increased playing time, maybe he will stick around.
    
    Russ                                                                
77.1107MROA::RSCHOTTTue Jan 17 1995 12:4823
         Interesting comments by John Calipari on the Ted Sarandis Show
    on WEEI last night, regarding the professional future of Marcus Camby.
    A caller asked if Calipari and Camby had discussed Camby leaving early
    to turn pro.  Calipari stated that he advised Camby, that if Camby
    would be drafted in the top three or four positions in the draft after this
    season, then he should declare and make himself available for the
    draft.  Otherwise, he should play another year, and perhaps be the
    number one pick in some future year.  He also stated that Camby "likes
    college" and would like to stay in school, or something to that effect.
    
         A lot depends on whether Rasheed Wallace and Joe Smith come out,
    because both would probably be selected ahead of Camby, based on
    superior physical development.  I have a feeling that once Camby grows
    into his body (fills out/becomes more muscular) he'll be a better pro
    than either Wallace or Smith, however.
    
    Russ
    
    - impressive outing by UCONN last night against the Hoyas.  I
    understand that SI will have an article in the near future,
    highlighting UMASS and UCONN, their hoop ascendancy, their close 
    physical proximity, and reluctance to play one another.
                             
77.1108eMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Jan 17 1995 12:554
    
      Nazz' much awaited Globe update on the scholastic progress
     of UMass' b-ball players came yesterday. The perception of an
     anti-UMass bias continues to lose credibility.
77.1109CSLALL::BRULEyou don't know what you have until you lose it:exTue Jan 17 1995 13:084
    When was the last time UCONN played UMASS? The last time I can remember
    is the night the roof caved in at the Hartford Civic Center.
    
    Mike
77.1110MROA::RSCHOTTTue Jan 17 1995 13:218
         Once the BE was formed, UMASS and UCONN met once annually, all
    through the '80's and up until the 1990 season.  Calipari's teams have
    played Calhoun's teams twice, with UCONN prevailing in '89 at Storrs
    104-75, and in '90 at Springfield, 94-75.  Prior to the formation of
    the Big East, the teams would play a home and home series each year.
    UCONN leads in the series, 60-38.  UMASS' last win was in 1984.
    
    Russ
77.1111CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Tue Jan 17 1995 13:309
Yes.  UConn and UMass did play up till 1990.  At that point in time, UCONN
was a little more competitive nationally than UMASS, and for whatever reason
the series was stopped.

UCONN and UMASS used to be in the old Yankee conference and played quite
often back then (twice a year I believe)


'Saw
77.1112CNTROL::CHILDSPresident of Donny Osmond FanClubTue Jan 17 1995 13:535
 I think UMASS was becoming more competitive so the Big East brass told
 UConn to drop them........

 mike
77.1113HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 17 1995 14:033
  Wouldn't the league want big games to draw big crowds?

  George
77.1114HOTLNE::BRIANTue Jan 17 1995 14:126
    I think one of the reasons that the game was stopped was that UMASS
    wasn't as competetive and UCONN could play other games that would give
    the school more money.
    
    
    Brian
77.1115One story ..ILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersTue Jan 17 1995 14:1824
	UConn dropped UMass from their schedule because of a perceived
	lack of respect.

	The way I heard the story was UConn was scheduled to play @ UMass,
	there was a big snow storm and UConn asked to have the game
	postponed to a later date (other games through out New England
	were being cancelled/postponed that night). UMass said 'no', that
	they didn't want to reschedule the game.

	On the way from Storrs to Amherst the UConn bus slid all over the
	road and may even have been in a minor accident. The players were 
	visibly shaken up by the trip. Calhoun was really pissed off at 
	UMass for forcing them to play the game, stated that he wouldn't let 
	his program be treated like that, and vowed not to schedule UMass again
	(and remember, this was before UMass became a powerful team, so its
	not like he was ducking them).

	There was a big article in one of the Connecticut papers this past
	weekend discussing why UConn / UMass no longer play each other. 
	Their conclusion was the only thing stopping the two teams from getting
	together again was the egos of the two coaches.

	Vinny
77.1116UMASS as #1 should be bigger 'round hereAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeTue Jan 17 1995 14:2620
    No comments about the destruction of Penn the other night?  Apparently
    when UMass takes a team seriously and said team is not in the upper
    echelon said team is in big trouble.
    
    As I mentioned to one of our big UMass and College Bball fans the
    college basketball heyday really is in the past.  Between eastern teams
    being outrecruited and the payola scandals of the 50s the big emphasis
    isn't there.
    
    A UMASS team as Number 1 should have Boston Globe and tv medias in
    hysteria.  Grandmas, nuns, grocery clerks should be talking about it.
    Maybe it has to be Holy Cross or Providence in this position to get the
    attention of the masses but I'd think one of the tv stations would try
    to buy up any and all UMass games from here on out.
    
    The biggest game in these parts for buildup and attention was a
    Providence - Holy Cross game about 1959 with Cross featuring a guy call
    Jack the Shot Foley.
    
    Billte
77.1117HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 17 1995 14:309
  The other night on Boston's WBZ, Bob Lobel was describing UMASS as "Your
state university, UMASS..."

  I guess the local outlets have decided, rightly or wrongly, that there is
lack of interest in UMASS in these parts.

  Shouldn't be, seems lots of Boston area people went to UMASS.

  George
77.1118AKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeTue Jan 17 1995 14:3610
    George, One thing that would help would be if they had a local star not
    that many of the big national teams from around here did.  BC had three
    from the "Boston Six" in the 70s, Ernie D and Marvin were from
    Providence (was that '73,'74 outfit the highest ranked prior?), Ronnie
    Perry starred for Holy Cross about 1978.
    
    That would be the factor crucial to selling out the New Garden at $25 a
    pop for a double header with UConn and Umass and whomever.  Boston
    itself seems to get very few great basketball players and then loses
    them anyway
77.1119Not much to build upILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersTue Jan 17 1995 14:4221
	I think that the UMass basketball program has been getting plenty of 
	media attention lately. Actually, I am tired of seeing Calipari's
	face on the tv ... this man is NOT camera shy.

	All the 'big' games UMass has played (Arkansas/Kansas/Maryland/
	St.Louis/Penn) have been on national tv (either network or ESPN) 
	and most of the other games have been broadcast on Sportschannel. 
	In addition, Calipari has his own weekly show on Sportschannel and 
	he appeared last week on Tommy Heinsohn's 'Holding Court' post 
	Celtics game talk show.

	Plus, the local news shows (particulary Channel 4) have had live
	reports prior to all of the UMass home games.

	UMass is getting plenty of coverage. The only reason you may not
	be hearing big buildups for their games is because they are in the
	midst of conference games now, and no other team in the Atlantic 10
	is currently ranked in the Top 25. UMass should roll through conference
	play to March Madness.

	Vinny
77.1120MROA::WILKESTue Jan 17 1995 15:395
    re. 1118
    
    Sadly BC didn't get the top two players from the "Boston Six" back
    then. Its sad that the Boston area schools have never produced a
    comparable group of players in a single year since.
77.1121DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFree Whitey Bulger!Tue Jan 17 1995 15:438
	Much like with B.C. not playing UMASS is a no win brainer for UCONN.  
They have nothing to gain and everything to lose.  The storm incident is a 
convenient excuse for not playing a game that was now competitive.  If 
UMASS gets to the Final Four, all of New England will jump on the bandwagon 
and adopt them, if not they'll get relegated back to the "farm school" 
status.

				   /Don
77.1122BIGQ::MCKAYWed Jan 18 1995 15:1114
    Calhoun said he'd play em with alternating home games. 1 in Hartford,
    1 in Gampel 8*)
    
    Mark my words if Uconn beats Syracuse and then Kansas on the road,
    next week and Umass has even a scare similar to St. Bon., Huskies
    will vault into the #1 ranking.
    
    The big key to UMASS is they are shooting the 3 much better this
    year.  While I think Camby and Roe are above average players, they
    disappear WAY to much for my liking.  A 20 point scorer should
    NEVER be held to 2 or 4 points.  No excuse for Roe, Camby is still
    young physically and should develop into a force.  
    
    Jimbo
77.1123MROA::RSCHOTTWed Jan 18 1995 16:538
    RE: .1122
    
    "While I think Camby and Roe are above average players"
    
    Geez Jimbo, that's quite a compliment from you :^)!!!  Do you
    think Kerry Kittles and Laurence Moten are above average as well?
    
    Russ
77.1124CNTROL::CHILDSPresident of Donny Osmond FanClubWed Jan 18 1995 16:599
    
>    Geez Jimbo, that's quite a compliment from you :^)!!!  Do you
>    think Kerry Kittles and Laurence Moten are above average as well?
    
 
 While they're certainly not as good as anything UCoon throws out there
 (they'd be like the 8th and 9th player at UConn) they are servicable.

 mike for Jimbo
77.1125BIGQ::MCKAYWed Jan 18 1995 17:328
    Kittles and Moten have been much more consistant than either Roe or
    Camby.
    
    Mikey they have an outside shot at starting for the Huskies 8*) Camby
    for sure, but Roe over Donny Marshall, I don't think Calhoun could
    do it.  
    
    Jimbo
77.1126Huskies have been out of the gate strong beforeAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeWed Jan 18 1995 18:498
    Jimbo congrats on Conn's great start but this is about the time each
    year they destruct.  Don't hold your breath on #1 without a Umass loss.
    
    #1 is just rented what with tough SEC athletes, young NC, Duke; UCLA a
    typical PAC-10 creampuff there's no known teams to grab it.
    
    Now if you did beat Kansas out there you deserve credit but even that
    won't get you #1.
77.1127the gloves come offMROA::RSCHOTTThu Jan 19 1995 11:2720
    Hey Jimbo:
    
         You're kidding right?  Implying Jimmy C would start Donny Marshall
    over Lou Roe.  Marshall is no better than the third best PF in the Big
    East, behind at least Danya Abrams and John Wallace, and guys like
    Charles Minlend and Eric Williams could be put above him as well.  This
    is a guy who during the best year of his career could average no better
    than 5 and half rebounds a game!  He's a perimeter player masquerading
    in a power forward's body.
    
         Tell me about UCONN's devastating press, the explosiveness of Ray
    Allen, or the quality all around play of Sheffer the 2G.  Don't stretch
    your credibility talking up the skills of an inside player unable or 
    unwilling to do any heavy lifting in the paint.
    
    Russ
    
    - who could just see Lou Roe putting up a 28-13-3 line against the
    Huskies weak front court, in a Big Dance matchup.
                    
77.1128BIGQ::MCKAYThu Jan 19 1995 14:527
    re -.1
    
    hook line and sinker!!!
    
    Jimbo
    
    
77.1129na-na-na-na-na-nahMROA::RSCHOTTThu Jan 19 1995 16:134
         And another thing, our third string center (Meyer) is better than
    your third string center (Nantasket (beach) Willingham)!!
    
    Russ
77.1130Local boys don't make good at UConnTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Thu Jan 19 1995 17:518
    It's nice to see that UMass does recruit local talent, with five
    players from Massachusetts on the roster, and two more from nearby
    Hartford.  UConn, on the other hand, has no players from Connecticut
    on its roster, unless you count that Russian kid at the end of the
    bench.  I cain't understand why UConn has more kids from Israel than
    Connecticut on its team.
    
    NAZZ
77.1131BIGQ::MCKAYThu Jan 19 1995 18:3611
    Of course 2 of the 3 pro's UCONN has out there Chris Smith and 
    Scott Burrell hailed from Ct. but that doesn't count..........
    
    What can't you understand Nazz?  Would you be jealous that UCONN
    has had the likes of a Henefeld or a Sheffer.  Pretty good 
    recruiting if you ask me.
    
    I also think your wrong, I think their are 2 players from Ct.
    taking up space and waving towels on the end of the bench!
    
    Jimbo
77.1132Calhoun hates Calipari for landing CambyTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Thu Jan 19 1995 19:0610
    The roster was printed in Chris Wallace's Blue Ribbon College
    Basketball update, and I'm a subscriber, so I know I'm right on the
    roster.
    
    The point I was making was that recently UConn has been unsuccessful in
    recruiting local talent, so they have had to work extra hard to
    assemble a team, and they are jealous of UMass for having Williams and
    especially Camby.
    
    NAZZ
77.1133CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Thu Jan 19 1995 19:109
Gee, is it some kind of measure of "goodness" to have 
local players on your team?  I always thought the best
measure of "goodness" was W's.

I've taken to the UMass bandwagon, but I don't care where
their players are from.  I'd root for them if all their
players were all from Mars.

=Bob=
77.1134BIGQ::MCKAYFri Jan 20 1995 12:355
    A blurb in the globe yesterday said this week's SI has an article
    on the UCONN/UMASS game that doesn't happen.  Maybe we'll find out
    the scoop, because I have no idea why they don't play.
    
    Jimbo
77.1135HOTLNE::BRIANMon Jan 23 1995 15:195
    The article (written by old friend Gerry Callahan) said that the main
    reason the game was cancelled was the fact that Calhoun kept pressuring
    Umass to move the game to the spfld civic center.  Calapari wanted to
    keep playing the game in the cage, and since they both didn't want to
    give in , the game was cancelled.
77.1136when we get to the big games...USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jan 23 1995 16:401
As goes Camby, so goes UMass ???
77.1137MROA::RSCHOTTMon Jan 23 1995 17:5816
    Re:  -1
    
    Nah, I think UMASS future success is more dependent on strong
    guard play.  On Saturday, Williams played his worst game of the
    year (3-11 shooting and several poor decisions) and Padilla was
    struggling with the flu, and as a result the offense disappeared
    in the second half.
    
    Roe, Camby, Bright, Dingle et al, will more than hold their own
    against any collegiate opponent they might run up against, despite
    Jimbo's concerns about TV Lou's statline.
    
    It's when the guards turn the ball over and don't score, the Minutemen
    can be had.
    
    Russ
77.1138big UMass rooter that I amAKOCOA::BREENIt's all in the outcomeMon Jan 23 1995 18:383
    Okay, mes apologies to coach Cal, I was a little hard on him about not
    using Padilla until the final minutes.  I don't usually have much to
    critique about him.
77.1139HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jan 23 1995 18:455
  Hey, pretty exciting game Saturday.

  One less basket and that would have been it for being #1.

  George
77.1140TOOK::HALPINSteelers join the Browns in the Wait-til-next-year Club!!!Mon Jan 23 1995 20:1719
    
    
    
    	Regardless of how poorly UMASS!!! played in the 2nd half,
    you have to give them credit for sucking it up defensively
    at the end of the game to hold on for the win.
    
    	First Camby makes an excellent block of Temple's 2nd
    last shot attempt. Then the minutemen denied three consective
    inbound passes before Temple got offone last desparation heave
    with 0.6 seconds left.
    
    	Of course, this should end any talk of UMass sleepwalking
    through the A10 schedule. There are some teams who can play with
    this bunch. I'll say either Temple or St. Joe's will beat UMass
    on their home courts....
    
    JimH
    
77.1141MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Jan 24 1995 10:599
>    	Of course, this should end any talk of UMass sleepwalking
>    through the A10 schedule. There are some teams who can play with
>    this bunch. I'll say either Temple or St. Joe's will beat UMass
>    on their home courts....

     UMass may lose at Temple or St.Joseph's.  They should end up the regular
     season with 0 or 1 conference losses; anything else should be considered
     a disappointment.

77.1142"WSJ article on UMASS BBall"AKOCOA::TROYTue Jan 24 1995 11:079
    
    fyi: Yesterday's Wall Street Journal had an article by Fred Klein
    ,their sports reporter, on UMASS and Coach Cal. Overall, a positive
    article and worth reading.
    
    re: Number 1.  The way UCONN handled Syracuse last night is leading
    Vitale to say that if UCONN beats Kansas at their house, UCONN deserves
    to be Number 1.  The sluggish way UMASS has been playing, I think that
    is a real possibility. Also, UCLA has been quite impressive recently
77.1143no arguement hereWMOIS::BALL_KTue Jan 24 1995 11:3511
  > RE
  >  re: Number 1.  The way UCONN handled Syracuse last night is leading
  >  Vitale to say that if UCONN beats Kansas at their house, UCONN deserves
  >  to be Number 1.  The sluggish way UMASS has been playing, I think that
  >  is a real possibility. Also, UCLA has been quite impressive recently

    Even as a UMASS fan, I think this is tough to argue. If they win
    they'll be underfeated and have beaten the team that gave UMASS its
    only loss. and they've done it against some quality competition including
    3-4 teams that were in the top ten at the time (if you include DUKE,
    and the upcoming Kansas game)
77.1144UMASS is still #!GRANPA::TMARTINTue Jan 24 1995 19:1410
    I think that UMASS should remain #1 as long as they are winning.  It
    really doesn't matter how close the game as long as it's a "W" in the
    final outcome.  UCONN has had some close games vs lesser competition
    too, for ex Saturdays Seton Hall game went down to the final minute.
    
    why should UMASS loss the #! ranking for winning close games when UCONN
    is doing the same thing??
    
    Thomas  "CLASS OF '75" 
     
77.1145ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Tue Jan 24 1995 19:442
77.1146MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Jan 24 1995 20:116
>    why should UMASS loss the #! ranking for winning close games when UCONN
>    is doing the same thing??

     If UConn beats the team that beat UMass, goes unbeaten, and plays a
     tougher conference schedule from here on out, they should vault over
     UMass.  
77.1147But can they keep it up???GRANPA::TMARTINWed Jan 25 1995 12:4411
    re: 1145
    
    Boy, you really went out on a limb with that prediction.
    
    re: 1146
    
    Yea, I'd agree with you on that but can they remain unbeaten in the
    BE with all of their toughest games ahead of them???  I doubt it.
    I think their schedule has been somewhat light up to this point.
    
    Thomas
77.1148Prediction: So will I.SALEM::DODAStop Global WhiningWed Jan 25 1995 12:495
    <<< Note 77.1145 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>

    
   > Prediction:  UMass will be watching the final 4 on television.  

77.1149Impressive effort by shorthanded MinutemenTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 12:5112
    If UConn is unbeaten this season, they deserve to be #1.  If they beat
    Kansas this weekend, should they be #1?  I would still vote for UMass,
    but I wouldn't have a real problem with UConn going to the top spot.
    
    Without Kellogg, Weeks, and a limited role for Padilla last night
    (Weeks and Padilla have the flu, Kellogg a groin pull), UMass played
    their best game since the Penn massacre by crushing Duquesne 103-53.
    Camby, Roe, Dingle, Williams, and Travieso all played very well.  This 
    team is so deep that it can afford to have its starting point guard AND 
    his backup not in the rotation and still win by 50!
    
    NAZZ
77.1150HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 25 1995 12:5818
RE    <<< Note 77.1145 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>

>    Prediction:  UMass will be watching the final 4 on television.  

  Except in cases where a team is incredibly powerful like the Lou Alcinder
teams from U.C.L.A. you can almost always make the claim that any team will
"probably" be watching the final 4 on TV.

  Because of the single elimination format in the NCAA tornie, the probability
of any team advancing to the final 4 is not much better than the probability
of them winning four coin toss in a row. Ok, maybe a little better but not
much.

  If they would just change it to a best of 3 for each round it would make far
more sense but as it is, sure, any #1 team who deserves that rating can have
one bad game and get bounced.

  George
77.1151BIGQ::MCKAYWed Jan 25 1995 13:229
    UCONN's so called weak schedule so far has included at least 6 teams
    going to the big dance, Kansas makes 7 out of 16 games.  Exactly
    how many UMASS Victories are against teams who will be in the show??
    I'll take a shot and guess Dusquesne isn't one of them.  A 50 point
    blow out in a conference game....nice conference...
    
    I'm with Groaner on this one.......who said that 8*)
    
    Jimbo
77.1152BE > WAC > ND > A10 this yearWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 13:253
    
    
    
77.1153ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Jan 25 1995 13:397
77.1154'burgh college hoops on a downer!MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Wed Jan 25 1995 13:416
    Duquesne, Robert Morris and Pitt 'used' to be very talent laden
    basketball programs, but like they say, "Used-to-bes don't count
    anymore."
    
    
    billl
77.1155RGRANPA::TMARTINWed Jan 25 1995 14:3213
    Have they really???  who are the 6 teams that they have played???
    I'm sure that Hartford and Central Conn are not included in this
    list either.
    
    Umass has also played at least 6 teams going to the dance.
    
    		ARk,Kansas,Maryland,St. Louis,Penn and Temple.
    
    
    I wonder how these two teams would fare if they had played the other's
    schedule???  
    
    TM
77.1156AKOCOA::BREENOh Phu-bai, Oh Phu-bai. A helluva placeWed Jan 25 1995 14:469
    I didn't think UMass had played Maryland yet.  If not when are they
    playing (I suppose schedule is in this note and I could look it up,
    eh?)
    
    Nazz, is Kellogg indeed the starter and Padilla the backup.  I seem to
    recall noting that he was the key to one of the big wins they had.
    
    I might have missed the Temple game if I hadn't surfed it Sat. between
    other things.
77.1157DEC 10GRANPA::TMARTINWed Jan 25 1995 14:559
    re. 1156
    
    UMASS played Maryland in DEC.  It was a very close game but UMASS took
    control down the stretch and came out on top.  Somehow, it seems that
    a pretty good rivalry has come about between these two teams.  The
    teams will be involved in a Tournment here in Maryland next year at 
    the US AIR ARENA.
    
    TM  
77.1158As Calipari says, UMass will play anybodyTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 15:2915
    UMass beat Maryland in Baltimore 85-74 on 12/10.
    
    The Minutemen will play at least eight teams that will be in the
    NCAA field:  Temple, St. Joe's, Arkansas, Kansas, Maryland, St. Louis, 
    Penn, and Louisville, and at least three other teams with decent
    shots to make the tourney in Western Kentucky, SW Louisiana and 
    George Washington.  The UMass non-league schedule was rated the
    toughest in the company by one of those computer ranking programs
    at the start of the season.
    
    Derek Kellogg has started at point guard for UMass the last three
    seasons.  He is a senior and Padilla, a sophomore, is the logical
    successor nexted season.
    
    NAZZ
77.1159MROA::RSCHOTTWed Jan 25 1995 15:4520
         The fact that UMASS is number one in both polls, with one loss
    while UCONN is undefeated, is a recognition of the fact that UMASS has
    played a more difficult schedule to date.  If both schools keep
    winning, and UCONN vaults ahead of UMASS, that will be a recognition
    by the writers/coaches that UCONN's schedule from this point forward 
    is more difficult.  I have no problem with that.
    
         If UCONN can win on the road against the likes of Kansas, Syracuse
    and Georgetown (something they haven't proven they can do so far this
    year, because they've played the majority of their games in
    Hartford/Storrs), and remain undefeated otherwise, more power to them.
    
         The No. 1 ranking in the polls is important (to UMASS and UCONN)
    for a reason other than the macho posturing of the respective alumni of
    both schools.  Chances are the higher ranked of the two schools will be
    named as the No.1 seed in the East Regional and could well be playing
    the opening rounds at the Knickerbocker Arena in Albany.  Albany is a
    short drive from either school, and nice little "home court advantage"!
    
    Russ
77.1160MROA::RSCHOTTWed Jan 25 1995 15:4712
    re: -2
    
    Nazz:
    
         I don't think you want to add SW Louisiana to your list of NCAA
    contenders this year.  Whereas they have been to the Big Dance in the
    recent past, and have a fine coach in Marty Fletcher, the last time I
    looked, they were getting trashed pretty bad, in their games so far
    this season.
    
    Russ
    
77.1161WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 15:5412
    
    
        No Umass is # 1 because they started at #3 and vaulted to one than
    to 4 after there first loss than when all 3 teams ahead of them lost
    they went back up!
    
        I believe UConn started at #9 so they had a much harder struggle to
    gain spots after teams in front of them were losing!
    
    
    Chap
    
77.1162CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnWed Jan 25 1995 16:185
no Chappy UMass is number 1 because they're better. They're deeper and
more talent despite what IMJ has to say. 

mike
77.1163BE>>>>>>>>>>>>>A10WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 16:326
    
    
          15-0
          14-1
    
           Who's better????????
77.1164MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Jan 25 1995 16:323
	Not only will USL fail to go, but Louisville started the Metro 1-4
	in the conference, and better pick up the pace or will be out as well.
	I think UNCC and Tulane go from the Metro, with VPI a dark horse.
77.1165did they run-up the score to save the #1 spot ?USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jan 25 1995 17:1123
>         If UCONN can win on the road against the likes of Kansas, Syracuse
>    and Georgetown

Excellent observation.  And those 3 road games occur over the next 2 1/2
weeks.

BTW, I don't think UConn started as high as #9.  I don't believe there
was a BE school in the pre-season Top-10.


>         The No. 1 ranking in the polls is important (to UMASS and UCONN)
>    for a reason other than the macho posturing of the respective alumni of
>    both schools.  Chances are the higher ranked of the two schools will be
>    named as the No.1 seed in the East Regional and could well be playing
>    the opening rounds at the Knickerbocker Arena in Albany.  Albany is a
>    short drive from either school, and nice little "home court advantage"!

IMO, this is the ONLY reason to get excited about poll position.  I think
UMass will end the season in a better position than UConn (or any BE team)
'cause their schedule isn't nearly as tough.  That'll give them #1 in the
East, and either UConn or Syracuse will be shipped West, with the other
staying in the East as a #2 or #3...setting up a potential date with UMass
at the Meadowlands.
77.1166WHO ???GRANPA::TMARTINWed Jan 25 1995 17:125
    I'm still looking for the 6 teams that UCONN has played that will be in
    the dance.  I know they've played GTOWN, SYRACUSE and DUKE....who are
    the other 3 teams?????   Anybody.
    
    TM
77.1167USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jan 25 1995 17:167
>    the dance.  I know they've played GTOWN, SYRACUSE and DUKE....who are
>    the other 3 teams?????   Anybody.

Duke ain't gonna be in The Dance.  I think they've only played 4 teams
that will make it to the NCAA tournament:  Illinois, @Villanova, G'town
and Syracuse.  Note, only one on the road, although it was an impressive
win.
77.1168AKOCOA::BREENOh Phu-bai, Oh Phu-bai. A helluva placeWed Jan 25 1995 17:228
    I agree with Dave, the BE schedule with Providence and Villanova and
    even Pitt added to Georgetown and Syracuse is a lot tougher.
    
    Note that league games at the other team's court are always tough as
    UMass saw at St.Bonaventure.
    
    I'm not sure that at Miami is cake this year as Miami beat Providence
    there.
77.1169Didn't realize SW la. was having an off yearTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Wed Jan 25 1995 18:296
    Louisville's power ranking places them in the 30s.  Anything short of a 
    complete collapse assures them of being in the tourney.
    
    As for the Ragin Cajuns, they do have a cool nickname!
    
    NAZZ
77.1170MROA::RSCHOTTWed Jan 25 1995 19:1018
    Re:  1165
    
         As to whether UMASS ran up a score last night, the same question
    occurred to me.  Calipari has stated many times that he never wants
    to beat a team by more than 25 points, and will usually call off the
    troops long before the spread goes too far into the thirty's.  For
    example, when UMASS played Pitt at the Mullins Center in December, the
    potential was there for a mega blowout (Pitt had players out with
    injury, the A10/BE Thing, etc.)  Midway through the 2nd half however
    Calipari goes to the third string, and they are instructed to walk the
    ball up the court, and run it down to the final 10 seconds on the shot
    clock, etc.  End result, an 85-57 margin.
    
         Last night the scubbini's played a lot, but it was run and gun,
    even after the score hit 80-40!  Me thinks Coach Cal is watching the
    polls, despite claims to the contrary on his TV Show!
    
    Russ
77.1171MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Jan 25 1995 19:077
>    Louisville's power ranking places them in the 30s.  Anything short of a 
>    complete collapse assures them of being in the tourney.

     Louisville is playing very pathetic ball in the conference, however.
     A fifth place regular season result in the Metro Conference isn't get
     them an invite to the dance.  They could win the conference tournament,
     but right now I wouldn't bet on them making it.  
77.1172Wish BC had your MeyerAKOCOA::BREENOh Phu-bai, Oh Phu-bai. A helluva placeWed Jan 25 1995 19:179
    Russ with the likes of Meyer as last string center etc Cal has noone to
    put in there to keep the score down.  Not to speak of these guys
    thirsting for playing time.
    
    As a coach I would never instruct players to do anything less than all
    out.  If the end of the bench is adding to the lead then c'est la vie.
    
    Now Georgia Tech was a little rough on Cumberland college back a few
    but 103-57 is just one of those things.
77.1173USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jan 26 1995 13:529
>    As a coach I would never instruct players to do anything less than all
>    out.  If the end of the bench is adding to the lead then c'est la vie.

The subs can go all out running the half-court offense after using the
clock.

An opposing team knows that they aren't as good, and deserve to be
soundly beaten.  But they also know when the other team is running
it up on them.
77.1174MROA::RSCHOTTMon Jan 30 1995 11:1416
         The UMASS men's hockey and basketball teams pulled off two
    pretty amazing victories over the weekend.  First, on Friday night,
    after playing 35 lackluster minutes against a very average West
    Virginia team in Morgantown, the hoopsters found themselves trailing
    by 18 points.  Then with a furious rally, the Minutemen came back to
    tie in regulation, and win with a Mike Williams (who else?) three
    pointer in OT, 97-94!
    
         Then on Saturday at the Mullins Center, the hockey team knocked
    off number 1 in the nation, Maine, by a score of 4-2!!!  Freshman
    goalie Brian Regan turned back an incredible 51 shots!  What's truly
    amazing is that this team of nearly all freshmen and sophomores, didn't
    even exist two years ago today!  Hats off to Coach Joe Mallen and his
    young team!
    
    Russ
77.1175They almost got the Grant's tomb question thoAKOCOA::BREENMon Jan 30 1995 13:174
    I hear the UMass Basketball team and the Maine Hockey team had a round
    of jeopardy after the games.
    
    Nobody won.
77.1176CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 30 1995 13:588
>
>    I hear the UMass Basketball team and the Maine Hockey team had a round
>    of jeopardy after the games.
>    


Well, they were close on Grant's Tomb.  Donte "Not So" Bright thought that
Horace Grant was buried there......
77.1177Both teams are Hooked on Phonics....TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Mon Jan 30 1995 14:1712
    
    
>    I hear the UMass Basketball team and the Maine Hockey team had a round
>    of jeopardy after the games.
>   
    
    	I heard they held a joint meeting of their "Phonics Anonymous"
    chapters...
    
    JimH
     
    
77.1178CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 30 1995 14:183
I heard they were going to be competing against each other on
"As Schools Match Wits", but they FCC intervened and said it would
violate the Truth in Advertising laws....
77.1179MROA::RSCHOTTMon Jan 30 1995 16:0616
         Geez, you BE guys are a trip.  You talk trash all of last week
    leading up to the Big Game.  Your best team ventures forth to play a
    tough insectional rival, and away from the Yales and Fairfields (or
    St.Leo's or Long Island or whatever) and outside of that nice little 
    inbred schedule you all are so proud of.  Then your best team gets
    beaten .... no humiliated on the National Tube, and the best you can
    come up with is snippy little one liners about Donta Bright, and how
    the game with the Jayhawks was a learning experience (excellent loss
    (tm))!
    
         If you can't walk the walk, you shouldn't talk the talk.
    
    Russ
    
    - if only ACChris were still around and about  
                   
77.1180@home too wasn't it????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Mon Jan 30 1995 16:125
    
    
    
          Yup great game by that great #1 team in the nation UMASS winning
    by 1 over the great W VA. team!!!
77.1181CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Mon Jan 30 1995 16:3517
So Russ, what's your point?

Do you want us beating our chest with Mea Culpas?  I'm sure UMASS has its
share of creampuffs.  I didn't see that UMASS beat Kansas last I looked.

And UCONN will learn from this, no doubt.  It's gut-check time in Storrs.


But, no matter what, and no matter how you look at it, if you add up all
the individual GPAs on the UMASS team, you might get a respectable 3.1,
combined.


We'll see who's where when all is said and done.....


'saw
77.1182TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Mon Jan 30 1995 16:4611
    
    
    
    	Gee Russ, just because I joined in on the fun, and poke a little
    at UMASS and UMaine. Its no reason for you to go and get really nasty
    and call me a Big East fan!!!! Geez, everybody is touchy today!!!
    
    	I was only kidding!!
    
    JimH :-) :-) :-)
    
77.1183METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleMon Jan 30 1995 17:047
> I was only kidding!!

yabbut you are not one of the people that we know we need to think twice
about responding to since they may simply want to create havoc.

The Crazy Met
77.1184WMOIS::BALL_KMon Jan 30 1995 17:2714
 >>   I didn't see that UMASS beat Kansas last I looked.
                     
    But at least it was respectable.. If Kansas could've hit some FT's
    they would won by 50 ....pathetic :o)
    
    Seriously, that is a good looking team, fortunately for UCONN they
    probably won't run into a point guard like Vaughn who can
    single-handedly dismantle their press very often.
    
    BTW how did you Big East guys feel about Coach Cal managing to get 
    into the act ?
                 				
                                            KB
    
77.1185USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jan 30 1995 17:328
>         Geez, you BE guys are a trip.  You talk trash all of last week
>    leading up to the Big Game.  Your best team ventures forth to play a
>    tough insectional rival, and away from the Yales and Fairfields (or
>    St.Leo's or Long Island or whatever) and outside of that nice little 
>    inbred schedule you all are so proud of.                 ^^^^^^^^^^^
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

creampuff sched = A-10 regular season
77.1186a10 vs BEWMOIS::BALL_KMon Jan 30 1995 17:3815
creampuff sched = A-10 regular season
  re: creampuff sched = A-10 regular season
 
    GW      beat    Sryacuse
    UMASS   beat    Pitt
    St Joes beat    Villanova
    WV      beat    Pitt                      
    RI      lost to Providence
    
    I wouldn't be stupid enough to say the A10 is as good as the Big East 
    and I might be forgetting a game or two, but...
                                              
    It looks relatively competitive doesn't it ?
    
    
77.1187A10 can play with BEGRANPA::TMARTINMon Jan 30 1995 18:0611
    I took my son to the Georgetown/PITT game on saturday and I wasn't too
    impressed with GT.  Even though they won the game by 11, Pitt was in
    the game down to the final 2 minutes.
    
    I believe a10 teams such as GW Wva St Joes or Temple could certaintly
    play with Georgetown.  I'd like to see more BE vs A10 match-ups
    during the season.  
    
    Anyone else???
    
    Thomas
77.1188That smaller, simpler (and more fun) ECAC worldAKOCOA::BREENMon Jan 30 1995 19:4713
    Well once upon a time we had this thing called the ECAC and everybody
    from the Bonnies to the Big 5 played everyone else.  In fact St
    Bonaventure, Temple and Providence were about the most consistent
    winners.
    
    If teams were good tv picked them up.  BC, Holy Cross and Providence
    all had their share of good teams.  Then big bucks came into play and
    tv demanded something predictable.  The BE got in first and were able
    to buy the best eastern players away from the rest of the country and 
    now we have the A-10 and BE and everyone else walks.
    
    And of course never let an A-10 play a BE outside of ncaas if it can be
    avoided.
77.1189Oh NO.....MarcusGRANPA::TMARTINThu Feb 02 1995 12:049
    Anyone have the scoop on Marcus Camby's injury???  Please post it here
    when word comes down.
    
    Good win last night. 
    Meyer and Norville played very well filling in for Marcus after he went
    down.  Looks like the team will be without Camby for at least the next
    2 to 3 weeks.  Let's hope he's not done for the year.
    
    Thomas
77.1190CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnThu Feb 02 1995 12:544
 2-3 weeks is what I read unless it's thorn away from the bone in which 
 case it will be alot longer.........

 mike
77.1191BIGQ::MCKAYThu Feb 02 1995 13:059
    I'll be interested to see what the injury actually is.  they are saying
    hamstring yet he was not feeling the "normal" hamstring pull area
    when he fell down.  It looked to me more like the pain was a 
    bit higher.  Don't know if that's better or worse just an observation.
    
    Yes that would mean I was actually watching a UMASS game.  Rooting for
    St Joe's but watching nonetheless.
    
    Jimbo
77.1192MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Thu Feb 02 1995 14:057
	re camby's injury:

	Word on the radio this morning said there was a good chance that
	he was gone for the season.


	billl
77.1193sorry UMass fans...I just don't like the guy...USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 02 1995 14:074
>	Word on the radio this morning said there was a good chance that
>	he was gone for the season.

Damn....now Calipari will have an excuse...
77.1194No excuses necessaryGRANPA::TMARTINThu Feb 02 1995 14:247
    Coach Cal doesn't need an excuse!!
    
    He has people who can pick up the slack as evidenced by last night's
    game.  
    
    
    Thomas
77.1195????????????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_Mjan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!!Thu Feb 02 1995 14:427
    
    
        So is Coach Cal the love child of Mike Lupica and Rick Pitino??
    
    
    
    Chap
77.1196WMOIS::BALL_KThu Feb 02 1995 14:5313
    
.  >  He has people who can pick up the slack as evidenced by last night's
   > game.  
                 
           
    He has people to pick up the slack, (they may still be a top ten or top
    15 team) but without Camby, they can't really be considered a legimate
    contender for the NCAA title, just a long shot. 
    
    BTW, Lou Roe also went down. Was that just a cramp or something to do
    with the knee ?
    
    
77.1197classic snake-oil salesman...USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 02 1995 14:561
I wanna know how he gets on WFAN (NYC) so often ?
77.1198yGRANPA::TMARTINThu Feb 02 1995 17:094
    Okay you guys, I guess we should just fold up the tents, give up the #1
    ranking and pack it in.  Maybe we'll do better next year.
    
    TM
77.1199CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is FIVE!!!Thu Feb 02 1995 18:1510
    
|    He has people who can pick up the slack as evidenced by last night's
|   game.  

Uhh, who were they playing lasted night?

As a UMASS bandwagoner, I hope they can pick up the slack,
but their wins against weak teams have not been too impressive.

=Bob=
77.1200SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Thu Feb 02 1995 18:409
    
    	Is it definent that Camby is out for the season? We have 6 weeks
    until the NCAA tournament. They should be able to retain the #1 seed
    with an easy A-10 schedule left. Giving them the #1 seed in the East.
    They should be good enough to win there first two games, giving Marcus
    another week. So that gives him seven weeks to recover. Unless he
    torn the muscle off of the bone, he will play in the tourny.
    
    Ron
77.1201I sorta like MeyerAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeThu Feb 02 1995 18:466
    Just from observation Meyer is excellent.  He's had low minutes but I
    honestly think he'll be drafted (he's 7'2").  The other guy is touted
    but I haven't seen him.
    
    Sans Camby UMass will be more focused.  It'd be nice to have him come
    Maryland/UNC/arkansas time I do agree.
77.1202News is fairly good on CambyMROA::WILKESThu Feb 02 1995 19:083
    According to the Radio early this afternoon the news on Camby is
    relatively good. He has a "second degree" strain of the hamstring and
    is expected to be out for three weeks.
77.1203MROA::RSCHOTTThu Feb 02 1995 19:1220
         Meyer plays very well when he's matched up against wide bodies.
    His best games at UMASS have been two years ago against Yinka Dare,
    when Harper Williams was out, last year in the NIT Preseason Tourney
    against Eric Montross, and last night against the low post duo of
    Carlin Warley and Reggie Townsend.  He gets in quick foul trouble when
    matched up against quick centers.  While he has improved greatly since
    his freshman season, his offensive game is so lacking that his only
    professional hoop future would be in some third world country.  Meyer is
    going to leave UMASS with an MBA after this season, and is interested
    in heading to Wall Street, from what I've read.
    
         The good news is that WEEI Radio is reporting that Camby has a
    second degree hamstring sprain and will be out for three weeks, and
    not the remainder of the season.
    
    Russ
    
    - It was amazing how quiet last night's crowd became, when Camby went 
      down!  One could almost hear the proverbial pin dropping!
                      
77.1204Sounds like Meyer has the Cooney thangAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeThu Feb 02 1995 19:319
    So you say Russ.  At least he'll now have 3 or 4 weeks to show what he
    does have.  Perhaps his skills have rusted a bit thru non-use but last
    year he surely did seem to fill the bill when used.
    
    Globe had a filler on Eddie Jones and his success with the Lakers
    (Jones of course took part in the epic Temple-UMass wars last year). 
    What a shame that the Celtics, what with the Acie debacle, had no
    choice but to pass on Jones.  Thank God Montross (you're widebody) came
    thru.
77.1205MROA::RSCHOTTThu Feb 02 1995 19:5011
         To your point Bill, if Meyer had played for a program where he
    could have received 25 minutes per game of court time, his skills may
    have progressed enough whereby an NBA team might take a chance on
    him.  He has the physical numbers, 7'2" 265 lbs., and long arms (unlike
    Greg Kite) that the pro's like.  However, today, at his current level
    of development, he's an "adventure" on the offensive end.  I won't
    disagree that he can be an asset defensively, blocking shots, banging
    for position and rebounding.  He's certainly a nice "situational"
    player to bring off the bench!
    
    Russ                          
77.1206Gut check timeGRANPA::TMARTINFri Feb 03 1995 12:1712
    Camby's absence may end up having a positive effect on this team.
    
    For starters, the rest of the team will have to step up their games.
    For instance, it appeared to me that Lou Roe played a lot more
    aggresively when Camby went out.  He was getting in position in the
    low post and calling for the ball for the little turn-around jumper.
    Lou definately needs to get his game back on track and maybe with
    Camby out he will do this.  Since everyone says our schedule is so 
    light (A10), this could be the oppurtunity to hone that "competative
    edge" this team will need for the tournament.
    
    Thomas
77.1207Hooked On Phonics....CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Fri Feb 03 1995 12:315
Marcus blew out a few brain cells, but not to worry.  I've heard they
set up a transplant from Donte "Not So" Bright, and Marcus will be back
and healthy soon.....

'Saw
77.1208WMOIS::BALL_KFri Feb 03 1995 12:3712
    I  agree that the Camby situation should help the team (particularly
    if he's back in tournament time).  Norville, Meyer and Weeks all should
    get quality minutes which should speed their development (assuming
    Weeks is still with the team. haven't seen him in the box score in
    a number of games).
    They also will end up with another L (or two) before the end of the
    season which will take them out of number 1 and remove the "bulls-eye"
    from their jersey for the tournament.
    I saw Calipari on some sportscast he said the might lose 4 or 5 games
    without him. yeh right ... It's a shame that its major part of these 
    guys (college coaches) job description to be proficient at lowering 
    expectations.
77.1209coach Cal wannabees?????CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnFri Feb 03 1995 12:438
 for those that may have missed my paper says 3 weeks 2nd degree tear....
 geez seems I read all the same stuff that the previous few replies said
 out of Cal's mouth about it being good for the team........

 ;^)

 mike
77.1210Donta "Not So" Bright. How clever!MSBCS::BRYDIEMike Lupica - Literary Giant!Fri Feb 03 1995 13:5120
           re .1207
    
            You really need to stop hanging around JD because you 
           obviously have a severe case of Devlin's Redundancy that
           causes you to repeat the same thing over and over again
           much to the annoyance of those around you. We all know
           that UMass had academic problems and none were more em-
           barassed than alums and Bay Staters who follow the team.
           Now, obviously the worse thing about it wasn't that some
           kids might not be getting the best education possible but
           that envious transplants and out-of-staters would have some
           fodder with which to attempt to denigrate the #1 team in
           the country by drumming on it over and over until the mind-
           numbing tedium of it all would be enough to make a raving 
           lunatic of anyone unfortunate to cross your path like some
           cyberspace chinese water torture. We realize that your bummed
           that your (newly adopted) team was thoroughly and completely 
           exposed and embarassed on national tv but don't take it out
           on us.
    
77.1211USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Feb 03 1995 14:0311
I won't be surprised if they still get a #1 seed, it just may not be in
the East (NC).  The NCAA selection committee considers injuries, so if
they only lose 2 or 3, I bet they still get a #1.  Every other top team
will probably suffer 2 or 3 losses too.

I don't buy Calipari's 4-5 losses (will they really lose to SW Louisiana ?),
but 3 is a distinct possibility, starting with Sat's game at GW.  They also
have road games at Temple and St. Joe's.

With their lack-luster efforts through the early A-10 schedule, having
to fight for wins the rest of the way may be good for them.
77.1212CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Fri Feb 03 1995 14:1623
Tommy,

Your reply obviously indicates that I was successful in what I attempted
to do.   Sometimes I just love to needle....


>           that your (newly adopted) team was thoroughly and completely 
>           exposed and embarassed on national tv but don't take it out
>           on us.

Newly adopted?  Hardly.  I've followed UCONN since the old Yankee conference
days when they regularly played ZooMass, URI, UNH, and Maine.

I followed them through the Corny Thompson days, on to the present.


I'm not a huge hoops fan -- it's the least of my favorite sports, but I've
always kept an eye (or two) on the Huskies.


'Saw
    

77.1213Misc.STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Feb 03 1995 14:2928
      I've thought about whether or not its an advantage.  I guess
      it goes both ways.  I can't see that there is a gain to Camby
      sitting out rather than playing games so far as Camby is
      concerned.  But, I can see a lot of gain to the other players
      being put in more of a psychological situation to really desire 
      to step things up a notch.  I suppose this benefit even outweighs 
      the negative of Camby sitting out.
    
      On Calipari...
      I graduated from UMass and they are my team, but I have to admit
      that I can see how Calipari would grate on people.  He seems like
      the kind of guy that when you were a kid, it would have been the
      worst to lose to.  I don't know.  He says the right thing so often
      and all that, but I feel like its a little on the polish side of
      things and less on the substance side of things.   Who knows?  
      Maybe I'm full of it; just my perception.
    
      Way to go Tommy.  I think the sheer repetition of the Donta "Not 
      So" Bright was (shall we say) old.  I'm a little sensitive to that
      thing to the extent that I'm not into making jokes about it.  The
      timing was bizarre.  Right after UConn gets blown out.  Weird timing.
      The last time I'd want to try to humble another guy's team is when
      my own gets massacred!
    
      Who can figure???
    
                                                     Tony
                                               
77.1214CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Fri Feb 03 1995 15:5232
>      So" Bright was (shall we say) old.  I'm a little sensitive to that
>      thing to the extent that I'm not into making jokes about it.  The
>      timing was bizarre.  Right after UConn gets blown out.  Weird timing.
>      The last time I'd want to try to humble another guy's team is when
>      my own gets massacred!
>    
>      Who can figure???
    
You don't have to figure.  I've made jokes about the brain power of ZooMass
before -- hell, I've made jokes about ZooMass in general for years.  One of
the guys that used to work in my group went there, and it was a ritual
for the four years he was in this group.  He'd rag on me, I'd rag on him.

I'm not into humbling anyone.  I'm just poking fun, which, last time I
checked the rules, was a year-round, anytime's open, activity.

And if you go back and check, I even poked fun at Donyell Marshall last
year, with his wonderful pickup lines in CT bars:

	
		DM:  	Hi, you want to go out with me?
		Girl:   Who are you?
		DM:  	Don't you know me?  I'm famous in this state!


Uconn's loss is a loss.  It shows up as one L, and highlights some problems
with the team.  It means no more in the big picture than any UMASS big
win......


'Saw

77.1215Lou Roe will prove once again that he's "the man"TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass - #1 again!!!Fri Feb 03 1995 19:2110
    I think UMass will be severely tested tomorrow at GW.  The other two
    games on this 3-game trip don't look as tough (Rutgers and SW
    Louisiana), but then they have a three game stretch in late February
    that appears dangerous:  Louisville (in Worcester), at Temple, and at
    St. Joe's.  I think if UMass can win tomorrow, they can still run the
    table and be the #1 team in the East.
    
    Lou Roe steps up tomorrow:  UMass 73, GW 64.
    
    NAZZ
77.1216The Big Cat!!STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Feb 03 1995 19:5511
      re: .1214
    
      Thanks for clarifying.
    
      Actually, from where I've been sitting, UMass' wins have
      been far from big.
    
      Who are they to be losing by 18 to West Virginia and go to
      OT against Bonny?
    
      Did Bonny get Lanier back or sumting???!!
77.1217CNTROL::CHILDSUMass &gt; UConnMon Feb 06 1995 11:287
 Well lets hope Clinton doesn't show up any more game. GW 78 UMass 75 for those
 who may have missed it. Didn't get to see the whole game thanks to storm
 cleanup but what I did see GW outplayed them and deserved the win. UMass was
 asleep defensively as GW had alot of easy layups in the first half.

 mike
77.1218UCONN>UMASS ..... for nowMROA::RSCHOTTMon Feb 06 1995 12:1420
    	   Re:	"easy layups in the first half"
    
         All through this current "slump", the UMASS defense has been
    a bit suspect.  Too many opposing guards are either beating the UMASS
    guards off the dribble, or as was the case on Saturday, srubbing the
    defender off picks, and cruising down the lane toward the hoop.  The
    difference on Saturday was the Camby wasn't there to alter the shots.
    
         Jarvis had a good game plan on Saturday.  How many times did
    Evans at 6'6" and Jones at 6'7" post up Kellogg or Williams?  After
    they were burned a few times, I thought Calipari might have moved
    Dingle over.  For the last few games, Williams in fact has been a
    liability on both ends.  On the final inbounds play (where he fouled
    out) he was no where close to denying the ball!  He has to break out 
    of his funk, or there will be additional losses before Camby returns!
    
         Still it was an entertaining game, and but for the final result
    a good way to spend a snowy afternoon.
    
    Russ
77.1219TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Mon Feb 06 1995 13:2319
    
    
    	Russ,
    
    		I thought Dingle was moved to cover the bigger guy
    in the second half? Of course the meove could have been made sooner.
    
    		Did the GW 7-footer (Kuel?) ever make a field goal? I seem
    to remember that he got all of his points from the foul line. If so,
    why didn't Weeks and Meyer back off him a little to see if he could
    even make a shot. The Minutemen were in early fould trouble in the 2nd
    half because Kuel got hacked every time he got the ball in the paint.
    Definitely made the comback more difficult.
    
    		Well, at least Umass doesn't have the #1 spotlight on them
    any more....
    
    JimH
    
77.1220Still looking to be the top seed in the EastTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Feb 06 1995 13:2725
    Terrible offensive foul call on Lou Roe with two minutes left, down by
    two or three.  Changed the entire game.  Mike Williams big toe on the
    line didn't help either.  If that shot was a 3, Padilla's 3 would have
    tied the game.  Still, GW deserved the win.
    
    I really liked Coach Cal's comments after the game.  He was emphatic
    about how the entire team would have to step their game up by 10%, not
    a lot, to compensate for the loss of Camby.  He mentioned how Kellogg
    screwed up the last play of the game, but stated that Derek played
    great and that's not why UMass lost.  He also had nice things to say
    about Roe (of course!), Weeks, Padilla, Travieso, and Dingle. 
    Noticably absent were comments about Williams, Bright, and Norville.
    Those threte (especially Mike and Donta) were the guys who didn't step
    their game up.  Williams is indeed a liability on defense lately.  He
    obviously should have fouled right away at the end of the game, but
    didn't.  That extra two seconds cost UMass a chance a a real shot at
    the end of the game.
    
    One comment about Coach Cal's coaching:  I was yelling for him to put
    in Padilla for Bright with a minute left so he'd have three guys who
    could hit the 3.  What happens - Bright takes an open 3 and misses.
    Then he subs Edgar for Donta and Padilla nails the 3 with 10 seconds
    left.  Oh, well.
    
    NAZZ
77.1221AKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeMon Feb 06 1995 14:343
    I've been after him to use Padilla more; perhaps now he will.
    
    Meyer was a 0-0-0 in the box score.  Did he look that bad?
77.1222GRANPA::TMARTINMon Feb 06 1995 16:4015
    Good observations Nazz.  I was thinking the same thing on that shot by
    Williams with his toe on the line.  On the last 10 seconds why not have
    on of the guys just muscle the ball away from the opposition??? Just
    step in and take it away and if you get called for the foul (which is
    what you want anyway, so what) if you don't hey who knows!!!  I've
    always wondered why coaches don't teach kids to do that, I've done it
    a couple of times (and gotten away with the steal without a foul).
    
    That was the game I thought they would lose.  I don't think any of
    us thought we'd get through the A10 schedule unbeaten even though we
    have that "cream puff" schedule.  Good win for GW and may help them to
    get into the dance.  This team is well coached and they play hard and
    always give UMASS a good game.
    
    Thomas
77.1223SeedingsLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Tue Feb 07 1995 16:178
      UMass #4 in AP and Kansas just lost to Oklahoma State last
      night.  Big Sky had 30 points/20 rebounds.
    
      I just hope they can get the #1 seed in the east so as to 
      have easiest competition and in Albany to boot.
    
      Meanwhile, whats up with Arkansas?  I don't understand it.
      They got hammered by Mississippi State last weekend.
77.1224Not in my paperAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeTue Feb 07 1995 19:413
    That's funny I had the score Arkansas winning by about 20 over state.
    
    That may have been in the Nashua telegraph.
77.1225HTH'sWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MJAN,279,270,267,264.230 OR BUSTTue Feb 07 1995 19:494
    
    
    
        Mississippt St won by 20+
77.1226NOT!MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Tue Feb 07 1995 19:514
	"The Telegraph's got it!"


	
77.1227MKOTS3::SMILLERWed Feb 08 1995 10:511
    UNC lost last night!
77.1228BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Feb 08 1995 13:526

	No comment on the UMASS/Rutgers game last night?  Kinda bizarre
	if you ask me.

	Kevin
77.1229throw back to the 60'sMKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Wed Feb 08 1995 14:057
 re UMASS/Rutgers game last night:

	Heard on the radio this morning that one of the options is to
	make Rutgers forfeit since it was on their home court.


	billl
77.1230USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 08 1995 14:185
>	Heard on the radio this morning that one of the options is to
>	make Rutgers forfeit since it was on their home court.

Given the current state of the team (ie: no Camby), my guess is Calipari
is fighting for this as we speak.
77.1231CSC32::MACGREGORWed Feb 08 1995 14:406
    
    Okay, for those of us that are information deprived, what happened in
    the UMASS/Rutgers game.
    
    Marc
    
77.1232METSNY::francusLast day as a free man 7/8Wed Feb 08 1995 14:427
The President of Rutgers made a comment that had very negative raciail
overtones. With UMass leading 31-29 a large group of people staged
a sit-in on the basketball court. Game was suspended; it can either be
continued, or Rutgers will forfeit the game.

The Crazy Met
77.1233Viva la huelga! (or something like that)TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Wed Feb 08 1995 14:458
    At halftime (Rutgers 31, UMass 29), just before the start of the second
    half, there was a protest by over 100 students.  They staged a sitdown
    on the court over racists remarks made by the university president.
    This was the first home game for Rutgers since the remarks became
    public.  The game was suspended.  If Rutgers cannot schedule a time
    to resume the game, UMass will win by forfeit.
    
    NAZZ
77.1234GW goes down big-timeTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Wed Feb 08 1995 14:466
    BTW, George Washington got smoked by St. Bonaventure lasted night
    79-61.  So much for GW guaranteeing itself a trip to the Big Dance (tm)
    with the victory over UMass.  The Bonnies are one of the most improved
    teams in the country.
    
    NAZZ
77.1235ROCK::GRONOWSKIThe dream is always the same...Wed Feb 08 1995 16:043
77.1236CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 08 1995 16:3315
More information.

It was also report on the radio today that the president of Rutgers had
apologized for his remarks prior to the protest taking place.

IMO, while they may have had cause to protest, it is quite possible in the
long run that they ended up doing more damage to their athletes, who had
to be clearly pumped for the UMASS game, especially coming off a road win,
and who may end up losing the game that couldn't be decided on the floor.


There's a time and a place.  I think they might have made an unwise choice.

JMHO,
'Saw
77.1237ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysWed Feb 08 1995 16:366
    
    Yeah, imagine those people ruining an important basketball game cause
    the university president said that blacks have some genetic defect
    (that's what was reported here, anyway).  Have they no shame?
    
    
77.1238CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 08 1995 16:3819
>    Yeah, imagine those people ruining an important basketball game cause
>    the university president said that blacks have some genetic defect
>    (that's what was reported here, anyway).  Have they no shame?

No, it's more than that.

If you have something to protest about, protest.  But if you hurt someone
else in the process, what have you gained?  What puts you "above" the
thing you are protesting?

Hell, if they had even left the court prior to the game having been suspended,
they would have been ahead....IMO.


'Saw

    
    

77.1239ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysWed Feb 08 1995 16:4310
    
    If they had left, we never would have heard about it.  This way it made
    the news reports all over the country (when someone else commits a
    racist act and it makes the news over the stuff going on in Arizona, ya
    know someone screwed up big time), and Rutgers has a major embarassment
    on its hand.  If they ahdn't done it the way they did, nothing would
    have happened, now something will.  I'll bet the people who did the
    sit-in were really pissed that Umass lost to GWU a few nights earlier.
    
    
77.1240ROCK::HUBERFrom Seneca to Cuyahoga FallsWed Feb 08 1995 16:509
    
    Agreed...
    
    Assuming a protest was the correct thing to do, and that the goal
    of the protest was expanded exposure of the incident that led to
    the protest, the timing was impeccable.  To say that it was not the
    time and/or place means changing the assumptions...
    
    Joe
77.1241GRANPA::TMARTINWed Feb 08 1995 16:5313
    As i was watching the UMD/UNC game and checking the SPORTS TICKER for
    the UMASS/Rutgers score, I saw the game was suspended and I didn't
    know what that meant.  Then the announcer for the game i was watching 
    says the game is suspended due to a "DISTRUBANCE".  Well I had 
    envisioned all kinds of things from a brawl in the stands to a
    shooting in the Gym but they never gave any more details.  I had to
    wait until halftime of the game on ESPN to find out what really
    happened.  It didn't seem like this was preplanned to me, it was
    more like "hey, she right!!, let's support her in this protest".
    
    It's not like Rutgers BBall team was going to win this game anyways.
    
    TM
77.1242WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MJAN,279,270,267,264.230 OR BUSTWed Feb 08 1995 16:579
    
    
    
          I also agree with Brews, they had to make a statement and an
    extended sit down protest was the ticket they used. And used very well
    it was all over the news last night.
    
    
    Chap
77.1243Here is quote and reference to possible contextAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeWed Feb 08 1995 16:5921
    The quote in the Globe is
    
    	[Do we have a fixed SAT number]"...or do we deal with a
    disadvantaged population that doesn't have the genetic, hereditary
    background to have a higher average."
    
    Somewhat of the context to this was in the WSJ article (a DEC freebie)
    I referred to in which a consensus of educators agreed that the Bell
    basepoint of Blacks is lower than whites which is lower than Asians.
    
    I noted at the time that this consensus was primarily made up of
    western universities; absent were the Harvards, Dartmouths etc.
    
    If genetic defect is construed then that exemplifies the poor wording
    he used.  I doubt that anything specifically racial was intended since
    that baseline "scientific" study also puts whites out of the top.
    
    Finally, even given the non-libaral makeup of the educators they agreed
    that the deviations in the various curves basically allowed for all
    races to compete relatively equal and that there is no significant genetic
    disadvantage for whites or blacks.
77.1244MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Feb 08 1995 17:055
    
       By your reckoning, Saw, baseball players and other workers
      with grievances (real or preceived) should only strike during
      non-working hours thus not harming anyone only peripherally
      involved in the issue at hand.
77.1245CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 08 1995 17:3144
>    
>       By your reckoning, Saw, baseball players and other workers
>      with grievances (real or preceived) should only strike during
>      non-working hours thus not harming anyone only peripherally
>      involved in the issue at hand.
>

How do you figure that?  You're really reaching.  To me a strike and a 
protest are two different things.  

A protest is the 'voicing' of an opinion with the hopes that it will make
some difference, as in when the protest is heard, it will hopefully change
some opinions, and perhaps, but maybe not, bring pressure to bear to
change things.

A strike is more like a boycott, which intends some level of damage to
be incurred.  All of us software engineers boycott our jobs (strike) in the
hopes that the loss of work to the company will make them more likely to
negotiate with us.  Again, it may or may not work, but no matter how you
cut it, damage takes place.


What I'm saying about these students is that they perhaps won the battle
but lost the war, because now there is at least some focus on their methods
rather than totally on their message.

My bet is that if they had ultimately moved without forcing the game to
be suspended it still would have made the news.  And they obviously did
there protest without regard to their hoops team.  

If I was a Rutgers hoops player (I know, I know, it'd NEVER happen!) and
I'd worked hard at getting up for the UMASS game, and was that close at
halftime, I'd be upset at what happened.  If my team ultimately ended up
forfeiting the game, then I wouldn't even have the satisfaction of at least
knowing that we lost ON THE FLOOR.


I hope that explains where I'm coming from.   To successfully protest 
something, one would think that one would have to be just a bit more
considerate than the one being protested against.....


Again, JMHO,
'Saw
77.1246In raging college boards debate, what place more appropriate?EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 08 1995 17:5017
> If I was a Rutgers hoops player (I know, I know, it'd NEVER happen!) and
> I'd worked hard at getting up for the UMASS game, and was that close at
> halftime, I'd be upset at what happened.  If my team ultimately ended up
> forfeiting the game, then I wouldn't even have the satisfaction of at least
> knowing that we lost ON THE FLOOR.
    
    I guess we'll find out, but I would not be surprised to learn that 
    some of the Rutgers players might have even supported the protest.  
    It's entirely likely that the protesters directed the action at a 
    basketball game precisely because it's an activity that the Rutgers 
    president "endorses" as within the capabilities of black students.  One 
    could be a Rutgers basketball player and a beneficiary of the basketball 
    program and still be very much insulted.
    
    glenn
    
77.1247TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Wed Feb 08 1995 18:0816
    
    
    
    	I have admiration for the Rutgers protesters. They did a great
    job of 1) gaining nationaly attention to the issue, and 2) in a way
    that reflects positively on the protesters themselves, i.e. it was
    a peaceful protest and the event they chose to distrupt was a minor
    on in the grand scheme of things. I mean  really, its was only a
    basketball game! At worst, the Umass athletic department will have
    to spring for an extra set of round trip air tickets to Newark.
    
    JimH
    
    
    
    	
77.1248CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 08 1995 18:1331
>    
>    	I have admiration for the Rutgers protesters. They did a great
>    job of 1) gaining nationaly attention to the issue, and 2) in a way
>    that reflects positively on the protesters themselves, i.e. it was
>    a peaceful protest and the event they chose to distrupt was a minor
>    on in the grand scheme of things. I mean  really, its was only a
>    basketball game! At worst, the Umass athletic department will have
>    to spring for an extra set of round trip air tickets to Newark.
>    


I'm pleased by the fact that they were moved enough to protest.  That's
a very good sign that young people today are not becoming apathetic.

I'm not so sure that it was any big deal that they gained national
attention.  I mean, it's not that great a feat.  These days, mention
race, mention any type of prejudice, and you're gonna have lots of
microphones in your face.  Louis Farrakhan, The KKK, radio personalities
etc etc etc.  


I guess maybe I've come from an environment that sometimes no matter
how much you wanted to protest something, sometimes you couldn't open
your mouth becuase it would be detrimental to someone or something else.
I guess maybe I'm a little more sensitive to having to protest in 
ways where you do as little harm as possible to someone else.    
    
    
Again, JMHO,
'Saw    	

77.1249call me crazyMKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Wed Feb 08 1995 18:317
	Sure are a lot of folks here putting words into someone else's
	mouth.  I'm of the opinion that I would like to hear the fellow's
	exact words along with the context to which he said it, before I
	go proclaiming the protesters heroes or dopes.


	billl
77.1250MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Feb 08 1995 18:3915
  >> I guess maybe I've come from an environment that sometimes no matter
  >> how much you wanted to protest something, sometimes you couldn't open
  >> your mouth becuase it would be detrimental to someone or something else.
  >> I guess maybe I'm a little more sensitive to having to protest in 
  >> ways where you do as little harm as possible to someone else.    
    
     And the last time that you really wanted to protest something but decorum
     prohibited it was? 
    
     I agree with Glenn that was the type of thing that at least some
     Rutgers players knew about. And I agree with Jim Halpin that all
     they interrupted was a basketball game not heart surgery. It was
     a well-planned and brilliantly executed protest that achieved its
     objective and no one was really hurt in the process.
77.1251MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Feb 08 1995 18:417
    
     >>	Sure are a lot of folks here putting words into someone else's
     >>	mouth.  I'm of the opinion that I would like to hear the fellow's
     >>	exact words along with the context to which he said it, before I
     >>	go proclaiming the protesters heroes or dopes.
    
        Look no further than the front page of the Globe's sports section.
77.1252Billl, take off your next unseen = billte AKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeWed Feb 08 1995 18:418
    .1243 has the quote which originally was made a month ago at a
    president's conference in which noone objected.
    
    Again, the quote in it's original contect of a scientific debate
    sounded different than spashed on the front of a newspaper.
    
    Whatever the real background some type of protest against the new
    version of prop (7?) was probably in order.  As i\\\
77.1253METSNY::francusLast day as a free man 7/8Wed Feb 08 1995 18:508
And it was on the front page of yesterday's NYTimes; that is before
the protest.

Question is was it put in prominent places in papers that are not in the 
Northeast corridor? If not they did not gain any additional space in that
forum.

The Crazy Met
77.1254just waiting for the facts afore I gets all riled upMKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Wed Feb 08 1995 18:5310
	I saw .1243, but like I said "complete" statement and the question
	he was asked that led to this reply.



	billl
	p.s. You'll never catch me thowing hard earned money at the
	Boston Globe.  I can form my own opinions.  I don't need no
	stankin' editorialist discussing their editorials as front
	page news articles.
77.1255HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Feb 08 1995 18:549
RE          <<< Note 77.1247 by TOOK::HALPIN "Jim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6" >>>

>At worst, the Umass athletic department will have
>    to spring for an extra set of round trip air tickets to Newark.
    
  Wouldn't it be cruel and unusual punishment or some such thing to force
anyone to go to Newark twice in the same year?

  George
77.1256MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Wed Feb 08 1995 18:554
	>>I don't need no stankin' editorialist discussing their 
	editorials as front page news articles.  ^^^^^^^

	I meant "disguising"
77.1257CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Wed Feb 08 1995 19:019
|Question is was it put in prominent places in papers that are not in the 
|Northeast corridor? If not they did not gain any additional space in that
|forum.

The attention that was gained by last night's civil 
disobediance was not to the incident, but to the fact
that the students at Rutgers protested the incident.

=Bob=
77.1258CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 08 1995 19:3317
>     And the last time that you really wanted to protest something but decorum
>     prohibited it was? 

About a month ago when one of the officers in the Guard clearly abused
his power to the detriment of one of the enlisted men.  

I really can't go into the details, but it was a situation where if I 
had opened my mouth, things would have clearly been bad for all.


Granted, it's nowhere near as noble as protesting racial inequality, 
but there are other inequalities that happen that aren't as glitzy....


'Saw

    
77.1259CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Wed Feb 08 1995 19:3410
|>     And the last time that you really wanted to protest something but decorum
|>     prohibited it was? 

And besides, what difference does it make?

I don't have to explain why I am the way I am.  I'm just that way because
I am, and have been shaped by my life's experiences.

I tend to be concerned with how my actions might affect others.....    

77.1260MKFSA::LONGClose, but no cigar!Wed Feb 08 1995 19:386
>>I tend to be concerned with how my actions might affect others.....    

	I'm wit chu!


	billl
77.1261TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Wed Feb 08 1995 19:5021
    
    
    	'Saw,
    
    		As you said a few replies back, it's easy (relatively)
    to get national attention. They could have torched a campus security
    crusier. Or vandelized the the admin building. Or one of many other
    possible stupid responses.
    
    		But these protesters managed to attract national
    attention to the issue, and not to themselves or their act of protest.
    Well, for the most part. That's what I admire about this incident.
    
    		Now people are concentrating the President's remarks. The
    issue can be dabated. And the basketball game can easily be continued.
    Yah, it isn't perfect. But it is a heck of a lot better than some of
    the alternative methods they could have used to garner attention
    
    JimH
    
    
77.1262DZIGN::ROBICHAUDHappy 100th BambinoWed Feb 08 1995 19:549
	Clearly the protests in Selma, Alabama disrupted the peace and 
tranquility of that small sleepy southern town.  We're only talking about a 
basketball game here and if the president of the university did indeed say 
certain races were genetically inferior, the students were within their rights.
What if a number of German students has protested another's claim of racial 
superiority back in the early 1930's?  Hey maybe they would've disrupted 
some folks, but maybe there wouldn't have been a second world war.

				   /Don
77.1263AKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeWed Feb 08 1995 20:5011
    /Don et al;
    	Then why when I brought attention to the WSJ article signed by 30+
    University Educators essentially stating the genetic differences in IQ
    are scientifically authenticated it passed in here sans comment.  I can
    only guess that this was the "research" he was referring to and the wsj
    is not mainstream media but the hullaboo should have occurred a month
    ago.
    	As I alluded before, this protest more than likely was against ncaa
    policies and politics than anything - sort of a shot across the bow
    type of thing.
    
77.1264Maybe not everyone is buying it...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Feb 08 1995 22:0321
>    Then why when I brought attention to the WSJ article signed by 30+
>    University Educators essentially stating the genetic differences in IQ
>    are scientifically authenticated it passed in here sans comment.
    
    Because you're not the president of Rutgers?  I'm familiar with the
    research you're talking about and I'd hardly call it "scientifically 
    authenticated".  I'd say it's pseudo-science at best, based in
    statistical research involving many assumptions moreso than true 
    genetic research (true genetic researchers have a hard enough time 
    identifying single genes responsible for very specific diseases, much 
    less trying to measure something incredibly complex like an innate 
    pre-capacity for intelligence or learning).
    
    In any case, absolutely, I can understand that students would protest 
    a university president endorsing such pseudo-science at their school
    even if it is the entire extent of his motives.  Free speech works
    both ways...
    
    glenn
     
77.1265bravo to the protestersCNTROL::CHILDSBig Brother &gt;&gt; John Q. PublicThu Feb 09 1995 11:187
 The game has been rescheduled to be picked up where it left off on 3/8
 at the Palestra in Philly. I thought Rutgers had an on campus facility?
 Does he double as a hockey rink thus creating a scheduling conflict 
 which would necessiate the change in venue???????

 mike
77.1266CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Thu Feb 09 1995 11:3322
There's lots of ways they could have gained national attention without
hurting anyone.

No need to torch a van, bomb an office (as someone did at Wesleyan a few
years ago) or anything like that.

Hell, these days there's enough media salivating over racial issues that
they could have gathered in the student union and called a press conference.

One point that someone mentioned to me last evening, and I've been mulling
over since was if the situation were reversed, and it was a group of
predominantly white students protesting a campus appearance and speech
by, say, Louis Farrakhan, would it have produced the same reaction?


At any rate, since this happened, a lot has come out about the president's
(should that be capitalized? not sure) record concerning minorities and
his efforts.  I'm not sure that his removal is really necessary, but 
everyone is calling for his head.....


'Saw
77.1267MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Feb 09 1995 11:4910
	While I agree with their position, I don't think that the method
	they used is any more (or less) right than the common anti-abortion
	protests which are being strictly regulated by federal law.

	Perhaps those who planned this thing should be brought up on
	federal conspiracy charges.


	:^)

77.1268MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 09 1995 12:0914
 >> One point that someone mentioned to me last evening, and I've been mulling
 >> over since was if the situation were reversed, and it was a group of
 >> predominantly white students protesting a campus appearance and speech
 >> by, say, Louis Farrakhan, would it have produced the same reaction?
    
    The fundamental point that you continue to miss is that this was not
    a campus visit by a controversial figure. It wasn't some obscure academic
    trying to sell a book. It was the president of these kids' university
    telling a segment of the student poulation that they were inferior.
    And that's a huge damned difference from someone weekend warrior
    national guardsmen getting drunk on what little power he has. In cases
    where folks feel so fundamentally wronged there's little room for the
    foolish notion of "polite protest".
77.1269CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Thu Feb 09 1995 12:4224
Well, I had a whole reply written up, but then thought better of
putting it in.  

Tommy, let's just say that a wrong is a wrong, and it doesn't matter
WHAT the arena is -- State Militia officer or Univerisity president.

The magnitude depends on what happens -- a remark versus an abuse of power.
You're 'with it' enough to know that all abuses of power are wrong no matter
where they occur.


For me, okay, the students protested.  Fine.  They made their point. 

Now we get to see just how with it they are.  Do they continue to call
for his resignation, which IMO would be stupid?  Or do they sit down 
and work out their differences, find out what the man really stands for
by looking at his entire record, and come to some understanding that
benefits all.

We'll see just how tolerant they are, we'll see if they are willing to
understand someone else, or if they are going to do the very thing that they
accuse someone else of doing -- making generalizations without understanding.

They got the spotlight, let's see what they do with it.....
77.1270TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6Thu Feb 09 1995 12:4636
    
    
>Hell, these days there's enough media salivating over racial issues that
>they could have gathered in the student union and called a press conference.
    
    	IMHO, that would have gooten local coverage and nothing else. By
    protesting at a basketball game involving a highly ranked team (I have
    to believe they had planned this with the hopes that Umass would still
    be ranked #1) they pretty much garanteed that they would be noticed
    nationally.
    

>One point that someone mentioned to me last evening, and I've been mulling
>over since was if the situation were reversed, and it was a group of
>predominantly white students protesting a campus appearance and speech
>by, say, Louis Farrakhan, would it have produced the same reaction?
    
    Funny you should mention it. The same night at a college in Worcester
    (Wor. State or Clark, I can't remember now...) they was a speech by
    Wellesly College professor and author Tony Martin. Martin, a black,
    has written a controversial book about the history of the African
    Slave trade. Martin apparently is especially vocal about the role
    of Jews in the African Slave trade, which draws a lot of protests.
    
    The speech got a lot of local press attention. One of the college
    trustees resigned last week in protest. Some people are calling for the
    president's resignation. There were people picketing outside the hall
    the night of the speech (both pro & con) and one man interrupt the
    speech and had to be removed.
    
    The incident didn't get any national attention, as far as I know. But
    then Umass was playing in town that night! :-)
    
    JimH
    
    
77.1271IMOWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MJAN,279,270,267,264.230 OR BUSTThu Feb 09 1995 12:5910
    
    
    
        Did they ask Jimmy the Geek what he sttod for when he said what he
    said? No they just canned him. If the Dean said what is being reported
    he said, he ought to be fired! There is no place for racism in the
    world today and especially not at major universities!
    
    
    Chap
77.1272CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Thu Feb 09 1995 13:0839
>        Did they ask Jimmy the Geek what he sttod for when he said what he
>    said? No they just canned him. If the Dean said what is being reported
>    he said, he ought to be fired! There is no place for racism in the
>    world today and especially not at major universities!
    

Slight difference.

As an example, it was reported that the president was one of the few college
presidents to speak up at an NCAA meeting against the use of SAT's in relation
to college athletic scholarships, since the tests might not be fair to
minority students.  There were other things mentioned on the radio too.

So, I guess my question would be this.  If the man makes a remark in the
last 10 minutes of a two-hour meeting that had nothing to do with minority
issues (I believe the meeting was about professor tenures or some such thing),
and the man has apologized, and in apologizing said that what he said is
not what he believes and what he stands for, and his record proves what he
stands for, then why force him to resign?


Or has the world suddenly gone stark raving made where everyone has to
be perfect, and no one is allowed a mistake.  Everyone perceives every
mistake someone makes to be a cut or a personal insult?

Personally, I'd fear the quiet racist who makes no remarks, but goes
about his racism in his actions, covering his bases.  I'd fear him more than
a man who seems to have a pretty solid record of trying to help all people,
and who makes a remark that is out seemingly out of character.

Everyone preaches tolerance, but I guess you only have to be tolerant of
someone else as long as they don't make any mistakes.....


If I got fired for every mistake I've made here, I'd have been gone a long
time ago......


'Saw
77.1273USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 09 1995 13:497
When they make up this game on March 8, it's at the beginning of
the A-10 tourney.  Is it in front of other games that night, or are
they playing 1/2 game only that night ?  If so, do they expect any
fans to come out ?

I understand that Camby (even if healthy) won't be allowed to play,
as he was not available for the 1st 1/2.
77.1274MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 09 1995 13:517
    
  >> When they make up this game on March 8, it's at the beginning of
  >> the A-10 tourney.  Is it in front of other games that night, or are
  >> they playing 1/2 game only that night ?  If so, do they expect any
  >> fans to come out ?
    
     According to the Globe, the game is March 2nd not the 8th.
77.1275CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Thu Feb 09 1995 13:546
What happens if players from either team are injured between now and then?

Let's say another UMASS star gets injured who is eligible to play.  Can
they sub for him from someone who wasn't available the other night?

Just curious how that works.....
77.1276CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Thu Feb 09 1995 13:557
|     According to the Globe, the game is March 2nd not the 8th.

I heard it was going to be two days before the A-10 tournament. 
They did this since both  teams were going to be in Philly for
the tournament.

=Bob=
77.1277CNTROL::CHILDSBig Brother &gt;&gt; John Q. PublicThu Feb 09 1995 14:066
 yeah my date could be incorrect. I know it was two days after the regular
 season ends and two days before the tournement starts.....thanks =Bob=
 that explains why they're at the Palestra instead of on campus at Rutgers.

 mike
77.1278MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 09 1995 14:1921

 >Or has the world suddenly gone stark raving made where everyone has to
 >be perfect, and no one is allowed a mistake.  Everyone perceives every
 >mistake someone makes to be a cut or a personal insult?

  Frank, your attempt to pass this off as just another exmaple of the 
  effects of the scourge of politcal correctness just underscores just
  how little you can relate to what these kids feel. This wasn't just
  a 'mistake'. Misspelling onomatopoeia is a mistake. A dean of a major
  state university calling a large portion of his student body genetically
  inferior is a real problem.

 >Personally, I'd fear the quiet racist who makes no remarks, but goes
 >about his racism in his actions, covering his bases.  I'd fear him more than
 >a man who seems to have a pretty solid record of trying to help all people,
 >and who makes a remark that is out seemingly out of character.

  You have little to fear from racists. That much is abundantly clear and
  becoming clearer all the time.
    
77.1279CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Thu Feb 09 1995 14:3663
>  Frank, your attempt to pass this off as just another exmaple of the 
>  effects of the scourge of politcal correctness just underscores just
>  how little you can relate to what these kids feel. This wasn't just
>  a 'mistake'. Misspelling onomatopoeia is a mistake. A dean of a major
>  state university calling a large portion of his student body genetically
>  inferior is a real problem.

I'm not passing it off.  But at least I'd like to hear the man explain 
himself, and view his remark on the basis of his record.  If it is way out
of line with what he's done, and that is apparently so from what I've heard,
then the man should at least have the opportunity to explain himself and
apologize, and work from there.

But, maybe you're right.  Let's just ride out there right now with the
tar and feathers and string this bastard up.  Maybe we could string up
his family too, because obviously they're just like him, and hey, while
we're at it, let's string me up to, because maybe, just maybe I think
the guy might deserve a second chance.  

I guess it's pretty obvious these days that the good you do doesn't matter,
because everybody is waiting for you to screw up that one time so that
they can pounce on you, and destroy you....



>  You have little to fear from racists. That much is abundantly clear and
>  becoming clearer all the time.

I'm not quite sure what you're getting at here Tommy.  I think I know you
too well to think that you're calling me a racist.  But you might be, I don't
know.  If you are, come right out and say it, and we'll talk about it.

Or if you like, I can assume that you are, and I can go off half cocked
about it.   But I'd prefer the first alternative....

We All have a lot to fear from racists, because racism affects EVERYONE.
Hitler :== Farrakhan :== KKK.  You name it, it is all hate.  It doesn't
matter.

I'm not going to sit here and say I'm perfect -- I'm far from perfect.
But I see injustice and inequality up and down the scale.  I'm not going to
slant it either.

My point is that these days, everyone -- EVERYONE, regardless of race,
or creed, or ethnic origin, seems to be going for the jugular.  It doesn't
matter if it is some guy who's Pop Tart catches fire in his toaster, or
someone who tells a dirty joke in the men's room and gets hauled up on
charges.

When people do do something wrong, it usually gets passed off as the
result of them being abused as children or something like that.  When someone
makes a mistake, they get crucified.    




It might sound awfully silly to some folks, but I guess what it boils down
to in my opinion is "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".
I don't think anyone has the right to call for his resignation without first
hearing his side of the story, and finding why he said what he said.

I'm not perfect, so how can I expect him to be?

77.1280Where's the Killer InstinctMROA::WILKESThu Feb 09 1995 14:452
    Back to basketball, why does UMass come out so flat in the first half
    of game after game in the Atlantic 10?
77.1281Let it endILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersThu Feb 09 1995 14:5223
	Personally, at first I thought the protest was a good thing,
	it was peaceful, it got the students point across to the 
	administration and it attracted media attention to their cause.

	But, I think they have gone too far now by insisting that the
	university president resign.

	The university president made those remarks in the context of
	a long speech back in November. When the specific remarks were 
	pulled out of context and made public this past week, he apologized
	and has continued to apologize. He has admitted that the words
	he chose were inappropriate and wrong.

	In addition, a recent survey has shown that over the past four
	years Rutgers is #1 or #2 in minority faculty hiring and minority
	graduation rates. This man does not lead a racist school and does
	not appear to be a racist. And he has apologized. The wrong
	has been righted, hasn't it?

	With this in mind, why do the students insist that the man resign
	his position? Haven't they gotten enough from their protest? 

	Vinny
77.1282WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MJAN,279,270,267,264.230 OR BUSTThu Feb 09 1995 14:5510
    
    
    
         Frank just a quick question?
    
        You keep bringing up all the Good the "Good Dean" has done. What
    exactly has he done? I'm not really up on the Rutgers program so I
    don't know what he has or hasn't done?
    
    Chap
77.1283Thoughts On ProtestLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Feb 09 1995 15:1116
      I'm not sure what should be done, but what he said was really
      bad!
    
      I think the demonstration was about as perfect as it could be.
      No violence whatsoever, but it made the media.
    
      I don't want to imply to equate the 'wrongness' of it all, but
      the Reverend Jesse Jackson made some rather racist remarks as
      well.  Something about "hymies" and "hymietown".  Certainly, not
      as bad as what this guy said, but derogatory nonetheless.
    
      So, I'm sure all of us folk who are on the 'high road' have already
      made the decision to never listen to anything Jesse says or to never
      support him in anyway.
    
                                                     Tony
77.1284On UMassLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Feb 09 1995 15:136
      Its looking like one of the biggest UMass wins this year was
      AT MARYLAND, the same place where the Terps beat Carolina by
      a healthy 13!!!
    
      And what is it with UMass' efforts?  Why can't Coach Cal better
      motivate this team?
77.1285HOTLNE::BRIANThu Feb 09 1995 15:2812
    I think a lot of the problems with the teams motivation is partly
    caused by some players becoming cocky.  They have had a lot of close
    games this year (that should have been easy w's) that the team has
    pulled out in the end.  
    
    After the WV game Camby and some of the other players were dancing on
    the floor and mixing it up with the WV crowd.  Instead of getting off
    the floor ASAP and realizing how lucky they were to leave with a win.
    
    
    	Brian
    
77.1286METSNY::francusLast day as a free man 7/8Thu Feb 09 1995 15:376
From what I recall in the NYTimes article before the protest he did a lot
of good work in terms of minority hiring and advancement in the positions
he held prior to coming to Rutgers and continued doing that at Rutgers.

The Crazy Met
77.1287die free or live!NPSS::PASQUALEThu Feb 09 1995 15:5411
    
    the unmitigated gall of these people to disrupt a basketball game for
    some silly little PC protest! I say throw the bums out! they have no 
    business screwing up a game for some stupid little airheaded protest..
    
    these people need a life.. 
    
    die free or live!
    
    /frammus
    
77.1288recruits?WMOIS::BALL_KThu Feb 09 1995 15:575
    Here's a question unrelated to anything ...
    
    Is UMASS in the running for any major recruits this year ?
    I havn't heard their name mentioned with respect to any of the "big"
    names.
77.1289USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 09 1995 16:4519
>    Is UMASS in the running for any major recruits this year ?

I've heard they're on Wayne Turner's list, along with Syracuse, UConn
and Michigan.  Turner attends Beaver Country Day (Newton, MA) and is
considered the #8 best HS player (regardless of position), and the 2nd
best point guard (behind Stephon Marbury).

UConn and Providence were the leaders until both signed point guards
in November.  Providence is gone, but he's looking to see if UConn is
interested in him as a 2-guard.  Michigan signed a guard out of Colo,
and looked to be out of it, but they've come after him again.  Syracuse
was after Marbury (as a PG), but he chose Geo Tech.  They wanted Turner
as a #2.  They've intensified their efforts to get him for either spot.

Little has been mentioned about UMass, other than they're on his list.

He's reportedly getting advice from Dana Barros' mother (a guidance
councilor at his school ?), and she's advising him to stay close to
home, which should rule out Mich.
77.1290USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 09 1995 16:472
BTW, wasn't it reported that some well-known Rutgers grad, who is a
champion of blacks' rights nationally, is supporting the Rutgers pres ?
77.1291MROA::RSCHOTTThu Feb 09 1995 16:5211
         UMASS is on the "lists" of several major recruits, but not in the
    preferred position with any of them.  It's my understanding that Wayne
    Turner (Ma.), Randell Jackson (Ma.), and Robert Traylor (Mi.) are all
    considering UMASS at this point.
    
         Why is UMASS struggling in its A-10 schedule?  In my opinion its
    because Mike Williams and Donta Bright are slumping, and the team as
    a whole is not rebounding and playing defense like they are capable.
    If they continue at this level, they won't make a Regional Final, IMHO.
    
    Russ
77.1292USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 09 1995 17:0810
>         Why is UMASS struggling in its A-10 schedule?
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

There's your answer.

These are kids, who are being told they're one of the best in the nation.
They know no one else in their conference is a threat.  Calipari's got
a tough job getting them up for these games.  Looking back, he probably
should have scheduled a big-time non-conference game in Feb as a wake-up
call to his players.
77.1293MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 09 1995 17:1312
    
    >> Why is UMASS struggling in its A-10 schedule?  
     
       When West Virginia looked like they were on their way to beating
       UMass all hell got ready to break loose in that arena. When GWU
       *did* beat UMass all hell *did* break looses. Their coach, their
       players and their fans behavhed like the win put them in the Final
       Four. That's what UMass is up against. Teams that put a big red
       circle around UMass on their calendars. 
    
       FWIW - has any team had as mediocre a PG as Kellogg and still
              managed to win it all?
77.1294CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Thu Feb 09 1995 17:3019
Chappy,

Rutgers is like 3rd in minority hiring of professors in the nation.

At an NCAA convention he spoke against the use of SATs as a yardstick in
handing out athletic scholarships because there is evidence they are
biased against minorities.

Their hoops coach who was interviewed on few minutes ago said he has
been at the U longer than the pres and never known him to be a racist
or racist in his policies.


Personally, I think it all goes to the picture of the man.  What he
said was wrong, but the man has apologize, and admitted he was wrong.
If he resigns, a lot of that good work perhaps gets stopped.  

JMHO,
'Saw
77.1295MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Feb 09 1995 17:4810
	But Saw,

	He did make the statement, and so he must be racist.  Just ask
	Tommy.

	And regarding a previous statement (Tony?) on Jesse Jackson's
	hymietown comment:

	He did make the statement, and so he must be racist.  Just ask
	Tommy.
77.1296MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 09 1995 17:5910
    >> He did make the statement, and so he must be racist.  Just ask
    >> Tommy.
    
       Of course, you can't point to where I called someone a "racist"
       because I didn't. You can use easy labels if you'd like but don't
       attribute such behavior to me.
    
       
       
77.1297CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Thu Feb 09 1995 18:0316
No, I know where Tommy's coming from, and he didn't call anyone as racist.

A couple of other folks in here did, though.


As for me, I still would like to see some sort of solution worked out
where everyone could benefit.

To me, this is different than say, Marge Schott.  She made racist remarks,
practiced racist policies and never really sincerely apologized.  This
man has.

None of us are perfect, but some of us at least try, I guess....


'Saw
77.1298MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Feb 09 1995 18:1718
>       Of course, you can't point to where I called someone a "racist"
>       because I didn't. You can use easy labels if you'd like but don't
>       attribute such behavior to me.
    
        No, you didn't use the label racist.

        You do seem to support his firing.  What is the reason you give ?
        It appears to me that the reason is he has insulted a large
	segment of his university's population.

	You aren't claiming that his remarks would have been any better if he
	had made them and then said "with the exception of Rutgers students
	and their families" or are you ?
       
	This is a serious question, and not just towards Tommy, BTW.  If anyone
	thinks that he should be fired, other than feeling the man is acting
	(has acted) in a racially offensive/discriminatory manner, then what
	is the justification ?  
77.1299We're running far off the original point...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Feb 09 1995 18:2827
    I think the issue has shifted here from the appropriateness of the
    protest to one of the president's resignation.  I consider those to 
    be separate even though obviously many (but not all) of the same
    persons are involved with each.  There seems to be a presumption in
    here that these protesters knew less of the facts than even we do, 
    and couldn't possibly have had their energies focused in the right
    direction.  I'm not yet convinced of that.
    
> At an NCAA convention he spoke against the use of SATs as a yardstick in
> handing out athletic scholarships because there is evidence they are
> biased against minorities.
    
    This is actually not a good argument against the protesters because 
    the president's comments that sparked the controversy, as reported, 
    were on the very same subject (why SAT scores shouldn't be used). 
    Unfortunately his explanation for the root of the "bias" was a little
    more insidious than the above.  Because as far as I can tell the man 
    is not a racist, I guess my biggest question is why he is apologizing 
    for something he apparently believes.  It doesn't seem like the kind of
    thing where you just wake up one morning suddenly realize that you were 
    wrong.  All things considered he probably shouldn't be forced to resign, 
    but I still don't see a problem with this specific protest against such 
    beliefs. 
    
    glenn
      
77.1300AKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeThu Feb 09 1995 19:0318
    Glenn,
    	The particular "research" and a policy statement was published in
    the Wall Street Journal the January.  I thought the article was going
    to be about IQs and testing thereof but it contained statements about
    genetic or hereditary median points.
    
    	What clued me into suspecting it was the obvious political
    associations of those professors signing it. Your statement on IQ's I
    am in basic agreement on except to add IQ as measured today is a small
    component of success.
    
    	But certainly the White Paper should be the focus of demonstration
    except that it is couched in academic language and certainly doesn't
    have any quotes like the one of the Pres.
    
    	Finally, it appears that the president should have been approached
    and asked for a clarification in that the very protest itself made his
    remarks a serious problem.
77.1301WMOIS::BALL_KFri Feb 10 1995 11:177
    Any comments on Virginia Tech, Lasalle and Dayton joining the A10 ? 
    I was hoping they'd get Depaul.
    
    ..and what's the story on this confernce developing between the Metro
    and the Great Midwest.. if UMASS wants to get in an upper echelon
    conference, this sounds like a good opportunity
    
77.1302SNAX::ERICKSONTime for Vacation...Fri Feb 10 1995 12:0512
    
    	The WSJ article and the President of Rutgers were just pointing to
    some facts. The average African-American's SAT score is something like
    750. With the average SAT for a Caucasion being higher, with the
    average SAT score of Asians being even higher. If everyone was equal
    and had the same opportunity. You would think that the average SAT
    scores would be closer then they are.
    	So if you keep moving the minimum SAT score for athletes higher
    and higher. You start getting closer and closer to the average for
    African-American's.
    
    Ron 
77.1303CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Fri Feb 10 1995 12:0928
This subject has obviously stirred a plethora of debates into action.
(Man, did that sentence suck or what?)

At any rate, some points I've heard in the past 24 hours on the radio
or TV:


	o Rutgers is #1 in minority hiring  (TV *late* last night, seemed to
		be Phil Donahue on CNBC)

	o Minorities have it easier to get into a school like Rutgers,
	  because the GPA requirements are lower.  It's not fair to
	  whites who have to work very hard and still might not get
	  in.   (Caller to WFAN)

	
	o His record is not one of racism  (Rutgers hoops coach on WFAN).


There were lots of others too numerous to mention, all mixed and varied.


I personally think all of the dialog to come out of this is a good thing,
but then I'm one of those idealistic people who tries to look for some good
in everything....


'Saw
77.1304MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Feb 10 1995 12:1511
     >> You do seem to support his firing.  What is the reason you give ?
     >> It appears to me that the reason is he has insulted a large
     >>	segment of his university's population.

        Strike two. I never said that I supported his firing either. All
        I said was that it was a legitimate protest when certain folks in
        here dragged out that tired old whipping boy "political correctness"
        (I hate that phrase) and tried to chalk it all up to just so much
        whining. 
    
77.1305MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Feb 10 1995 12:2811
      >> o Minorities have it easier to get into a school like Rutgers,
      >>  because the GPA requirements are lower.  It's not fair to
      >>  whites who have to work very hard and still might not get
      >>  in.   (Caller to WFAN)

          Rutgers is the state univeristy of New Jersey. State colleges
          by their very nature are often to get into than private ones.
          And as far as I know they aren't turning qualified applicants
          away. In general, enrollments are *declining* and schools are
          scrambling for students. How that's unfair to whites I'd really 
          like to know.
77.1306CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Fri Feb 10 1995 12:3011
|    	The WSJ article and the President of Rutgers were just pointing to
|    some facts. The average African-American's SAT score is something like

The jump of login comes when that is tied to *genetic* make-up.  There is little
doubt that people from lower socio-economic backgrounds *generally* tend to be
less academically prepared.  I didn't read the WSJ article, but I find it hard
to beleive a tie between this and genetic make-up.

There's a big difference between heredity and environment.

=Bob= 
77.1307CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Fri Feb 10 1995 12:313
Oh, and BTW:

I don't favor the Rutgers guy being fired either.
77.1308CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Fri Feb 10 1995 12:3424
>
>          Rutgers is the state univeristy of New Jersey. State colleges
>          by their very nature are often to get into than private ones.
>          And as far as I know they aren't turning qualified applicants
>          away. In general, enrollments are *declining* and schools are
>          scrambling for students. How that's unfair to whites I'd really 
>          like to know.
>

Yeah, I hear what you're saying.

I can't reall speak to it since I don't know.  It's been a long time since
I thought about going to school 8^) 8^) 8^)

Seriously, it was what one person was saying.

The point I wanted to make is that there's more opinions than Carter's has
little pills floating around, and it's kind of good to hear people talking
about it.  Communication is the key to understanding which is the key
to making something better.....

JMHO,
'Saw

77.1309EDWIN::WAUGAMANFri Feb 10 1995 12:3710
    
> The point I wanted to make is that there's more opinions than Carter's has
> little pills floating around, and it's kind of good to hear people talking
> about it.  Communication is the key to understanding which is the key
> to making something better.....
    
    [insert A-bomb sound effects here]
    
    ;-)
    
77.1310CNTROL::CHILDSBig Brother &gt;&gt; John Q. PublicFri Feb 10 1995 12:426
 well given that this has turned into the political note I was wondering
 how you guys feel about the new law congress passed allowing use of
 illegal obtained evidence and evidence attained without a search warrant?
 I think it sucks!!!!!!!!!

 mike
77.1311Not that there's anything wrong with that...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Fri Feb 10 1995 12:534
| illegal obtained evidence and evidence attained without a search warrant?
| I think it sucks!!!!!!!!!

Libertarian to the end, aren't you Mikey?
77.1313METSNY::francusLast day as a free man 7/8Fri Feb 10 1995 13:094
definitely sucks; hopefully the Senate will not pass it, or if they
do without enough to override a hoped for veto.

The Crazy Met
77.1314CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Fri Feb 10 1995 13:1113
| That should bother more than Libertarians.  

Please!  Have we gotten so testy here that I can't joke about things!

I don't know enough about the bill to comment, but never one to be at a loss for
words, I put a wisecrack in instead.

If indeed the bill condones illegal search and siezure, then we do have
something to worry about.  Then again, isn't just as bad when a clear-cut
criminal walks because of a legal procedural error?  There has to be a middle
ground.

=Bob=
77.1315CAMONE::WAYConspiring to make a mutiny...Fri Feb 10 1995 13:169
Whoa......

We're talking about the Rutgers stuff because we can MARGINALLY trace it
back to something which affects UMASS hoops.

Move the other stuff to the JN note....

We don't have a Rutgers note I don't think.....  If JoJ was here he'd
probably start one....8^)
77.1317A-10 is much more difficult than perceivedTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Fri Feb 10 1995 13:5013
    Back to UMass basketball....
    
    As for their recent slump, it's about time people stopped saying that
    the Atlantic-10 is having a down year.  Temple is down this year, but
    GW, St. Joe's and to everyone's surprise St. Bonaventure are all having
    very good seasons.  The A-10 is 4-1 vs the Big East so far this year,
    and they were 6-3 vs the BE last year.  Many people assumed UMass would
    roll through the conference after the way they handled non-league
    powers like Arkansas, Maryland, Western Kentucky (15-3), and Penn, but
    the reality has been that the league contests are just as difficult as
    those games against the more famous teams.
    
    NAZZ
77.1318Coach Cal has kept very close-mouthed about recruitingTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Fri Feb 10 1995 13:517
    About recruiting - 
    
    UMass supposedly has a verbal agreement with 6-3 shooting guard
    Charlton Clarke from St. Raymond's in NYC, the same school that
    brought them Dana Dingle.
    
    NAZZ
77.1319CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Fri Feb 10 1995 13:523
|    Maybe you need to get out of the OGO basement.  (-:  

The fungus from the mushrooms have taken over my brain...
77.1320USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Feb 10 1995 16:176
>                -< A-10 is much more difficult than perceived >-

Well, these perceptions are currently shared by everyone and anyone
who votes in the various polls.  The proof usually comes from the
NCAA tournament.  Let's see if what actually happens supports the
current perceptions.
77.1321GWU and BonaventureSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Feb 10 1995 16:493
      I'm surprised about GWU with Dare gone and Bonaventure, but
      in the case of Bonaventure, I'm pretty sure Bob Lanier did
      rejoin his old school!!
77.1322CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Fri Feb 10 1995 17:063
I don't know their record, but GW has pulled some impressive upsets.

They're always very well coached, and always get "up" for big games.
77.1323Clarke update.....MAIL2::SALTALAMACCHSat Feb 11 1995 00:015
    Charleton Clarke has not verbaled to anyone.  He's still wide open on
    SJU, UMass, UConn, SHU, etc.
    
    Redmen Phil
             
77.1324Meine zwei PfennigeMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRMon Feb 13 1995 09:4824
I feel compelled to add this to the Rutgers business.  'Saw, if you think
it ought to be moved to the JN, feel free.

If a man reads The Bell Curve and doesn't throw it across the room, yelling
"What kind of pseudoscientific, statistically illiterate horse droppings
is this?", is he intellectually qualified to be the President of a major
university?

For more on the merits, see this month's Scientific American.

.1314, =Bob=:

> If indeed the bill condones illegal search and siezure, then we do have
> something to worry about.  Then again, isn't just as bad when a clear-cut
> criminal walks because of a legal procedural error?  There has to be a middle
> ground.

No, it isn't just as bad.  No system of criminal justice is ever going to be
perfect, so you have to decide carefully on which side you are going to err:
do you risk freeing the guilty or do you risk convicting the innocent?  My
moral sense is offended far more by the latter, so I am quite willing to err
on the side of the accused.

Steve
77.1325"A10 Power rating way down"AKOCOA::TROYMon Feb 13 1995 11:2517
    re: Atlantic 10 Power rankings
    
    Last year, I believe that the A10 was 4th or so top conference in total
    Power rating.  There was a view graphic on one of the TV games that
    listed the Top 8 conferences and A10 was not on the list.
    
    While I am sure that A10 has a winning record against the Big East -
    there is a huge difference between the top 4 team there and the rest
    (BC, Pitt, St. John's- hype aside). Temple having a down year clearly
    impacts the A10 power rankings - as they play as tough a schedule as
    UMASS.
    
    Other notes: Word on radio this am that UMASS/BC game is ON for
    December this year - at the new Shawmut Center. Second week of December
    - I think the 9th.
    
    
77.1326MROA::RSCHOTTWed Feb 15 1995 11:4752
         In what has become a tale of two seasons, UMASS' Mr. Hyde
    personality emerged once again last night, as the Minutemen dropped an
    80 to 78 decision to the George Washington Colonials at the Mullins
    Center.  In the process, the UM'ies undefeated record at
    Mullins, and its nation's longest undefeated on-campus winning streak
    went by the boards.  By most accounts, the game wasn't as close as the
    final score indicated, as GW jumped out to an 8 or 10 point lead during
    the first half, and pretty much kept UMASS at arms length the rest of
    the way.  Only some marginal officiating (which was of NFL quality
    throughout - ie. bad!) and shoddy GW free throw shooting allowed UMASS 
    to make it close at the end.
    
         What's wrong with this team?  Clearly, Camby's injury has had an
    impact.  With Marcus healthy, the Minutemen would have won at least one
    and probably both GW games.  The problem is that GW is a good, but not
    a very good or great team.  UMASS at its current level, with or without
    Camby, cannot be counted upon to beat any of the Elite 8 level teams.
    First and foremost, the Minutemen are only a fair, outside shooting
    team.  Last night, in their own building, the UMASS guards shot a
    combined 8 for 43!  With their best shooter, Carmelo Travieso out with
    a bad back, the Minutemen are weak from the perimeter.
    
         Secondly, the swarming team defense that was a hallmark of this
    team early in the year, has disappeared.  UMASS won the battle of
    turnovers last night, but just barely 14-16.  To be successful at the
    highest level, they have to force turnovers, and keep teams under 75
    ppg.
    
         Next, Lou Roe is trying to carry too much of the load.  He turned
    in a quality 22 pt./12 rebound effort last night, but missed crucial
    free throws at inopportune times, and also spent time on the bench
    trying to work out recurring leg cramps.  After starting the season at
    220 lbs, my sources tell me he has been under 210 lbs. recently.
    
         While Roe has been steady, both Mike Williams and Donta Bright
    have been largely inconsistent.  Williams outside shot has left him,
    as evidenced by his 5 for 22 line last night, and Bright has just 
    disappeared altogether, in too many games.  After showing signs of
    being an offensive force early in the season, Donta has turned in too
    many 6 point games, and has been a general disappointment during the
    late season.
    
         With road games at Temple and St.Joe's, a game in Worcester
    against athletic Louisville (without an injured Samaki Walker btw), and
    the Rutgers second half, still to play, a couple of more losses are
    a real possibility.  A once promising season, has become clouded for
    the kids from Amherst.  There is time to right the ship, but with the
    uncertainty surrounding Camby's injury, and the fractured confidence 
    of the team in general, Calipari will have his work cut out for him!
    
    Russ
                                                                     
77.1327Give Padilla more timeAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeWed Feb 15 1995 12:513
    Sounds like Cal has to make a decision about Williams playing time.  If
    I were him I would go to three guard rotation with Padilla getting much
    more time.
77.1328WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Feb 15 1995 13:576
    
    GW sweeps UMass this year.
    
    Will GW still be unranked (beat SU, too) while SU and UMASS are?
    
    - Sean
77.1329Camby and Travieso will be back for post-seasonTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Wed Feb 15 1995 14:4125
    IMO, this loss could work in UMass' favor come tournament time.
    It seems to eliminate UMass as the odd team out in the "who gets to go
    West to be the #1 seed" sweepstakes.  UMass now appears destined to be
    either the #2 or #3 seed in the East.  If they reach the A-10 finals
    with no more losses, they will be #2 in the East.  If they lose more
    than one game the rest of the way, they most likely will be #3.  If you
    assume that UConn glides through the rest of its lowly Big (L)east
    schedule, they should be #1 in the East.  That would move Carolina to
    #1 in the West.  Despite Kentucky's loss last night, if they win the
    SEC tourney, they'll be #1 in the Southeast, and Kansas is a lock for
    #1 in the Midwest.  Here's how I see the top four seeds in each region
    as of today:
    
    EAST		SOUTHEAST	MIDWEST		WEST
    1. UConn		1. Kentucky	1. Kansas	1. North Carolina
    2. UMass		2. Maryland	2. Mich. State	2. UCLA
    3. Syr. or Vill.    3. Arizona	3. Missouri	3. Arkansas
    4. Wake Forest	4. Iowa State	4. Stanford	4. Arizona State
    
    Remember that teams from the same conference cannot meet until the 
    regional final - that's why the Big East runnerup would not be a #4
    seed if UConn is #1.  Likewise, the two PAC-10 teams are #2 and #4
    in the West and the Big 8 teams are #1 and #3 in the Midwest.
    
    NAZZ
77.1330MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Feb 15 1995 15:3134
>    EAST		SOUTHEAST	MIDWEST		WEST
>    1. UConn		1. Kentucky	1. Kansas	1. North Carolina
>    2. UMass		2. Maryland	2. Mich. State	2. UCLA
>    3. Syr. or Vill.    3. Arizona	3. Missouri	3. Arkansas
>    4. Wake Forest	4. Iowa State	4. Stanford	4. Arizona State
>    
>    Remember that teams from the same conference cannot meet until the 
>    regional final - that's why the Big East runnerup would not be a #4
>    seed if UConn is #1.  Likewise, the two PAC-10 teams are #2 and #4
>    in the West and the Big 8 teams are #1 and #3 in the Midwest.
>    
>    NAZZ
>

      They have never seeded two teams from the same conference in the
      top 4 spots of a regional, and will not do so this year.  So,
      Missouri won't be in the same regional as Kansas, nor will Villanova
      and UConn, nor will ASU and UCLA.  BTW, Stanford has a very low RPI
      rating and will probably be in the 7-10 category, not a #4 team.
      I wouldn't argue too much with the rest of your picks, although I
      suspect UNC will be seeded in the SE, with the SEC champ or Maryland
      as the top seed out west.

      I also agree, however, that UMass is probably coming back to the
      east regional (especially if UNC or Maryland goes to the west).
      Likely sweet 16 opponent probably comes from this group of teams:
      Arkansas, Mississippi State, Missouri, Michigan State, or Arizona.
      Assuming UConn comes to the east and UMass is the #2 or #3 seed in
      the east, then Syracuse and Villanova are out (but will probably be
      seeded in the top 16), UNC and Maryland are out (Maryland won't be in
      same bracket as UMass, and UNC will be a #1), Kansas a #1, UCLA out
      west.  I'm not sure anyone other than the 5 I've listed (possibly Wake,
      if they have a good run to end the season) has played well enough to
      get a #2 or #3 seed in the east.
77.1331BIGQ::MCKAYWed Feb 15 1995 15:5510
    I think it's way to early to pick seeds and regions.  Every one
    of your #1 seeds is going to lose at least 1 more game.  IMO
    no way does UMASS get higher than a 4, I expect 2 more losses from
    them.  Uconn will lose in the BET, Kentucky has a cold game in them
    as does Kansas.  UNC will lose in the ACC tourney.  The top seeds
    could end up to be ARk, UCLA, Maryland and Mich St.
    
    It's getting closer though.......
    
    Jimbo
77.1332"Why not more pressure + meyer?"AKOCOA::TROYWed Feb 15 1995 16:0218
    re: UM vs. GW.
    
    Is it too soon to say that GW has UMASS's number and that it is due to
    coaching?  If not for a last second stuff by Camby last year they would
    have lost their last 4 games to GW. It sure looks like the 'matchup'
    zones are putting enormous pressure on the 1-15 foot shots, whether
    as played by Temple or GW, and they let UM live or die by the 3.
    
    I especially am wondering why Calipari ties Roe down at the low post on
    'D' so much  - shouldn't the 5 fouls of Meyer be brought in more
    quickly, coupled with Weeks? While slow and not an offensive threat, it
    has always seemed that Meyer plays hard and does a credible job on D
    and rebounding.  As for the reliance on 3's and the lack of success -
    that would seem to me to indicate less pressure early, getting behind,
    having a half court offense that allows these zone oriented teams time
    to set up. 
    
    
77.1333USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 15 1995 16:557
re:  projecting seedings

BOTH Villanova and Syracuse will be among the top 16 seeds.  I don't remember
the last time SU was less than a #4, and they're playing well enough this
year to warrant that type of seed again.

Villanova is a locomotive that is building steam as the season goes along.
77.1334Are UMass fans A10 fans?AKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeWed Feb 15 1995 17:159
    I can't understand not using Meyer more;
    
    GW win has benefit of perhaps clinching an ncaa berth notwithstanding a
    darkhorse winning the A10 tourney
    
    What took V'nova so long.  They were coming last year too.
    
    If UMass blows out another non-conference opponent (Louisville) then it
    will show that they are serious tourney contenders.
77.1335USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 15 1995 17:238
>    If UMass blows out another non-conference opponent (Louisville) then it
>    will show that they are serious tourney contenders.

GW doesn't need UMass blowing out Louisville to get into the Big Dance.
They're in already.

Villanova won the NIT last year.  This year they're a solid top-16
club.  They can play with the big boys.
77.1336AKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeWed Feb 15 1995 17:299
    I remember Kentucky winning NIT and then NCAA the next year.  Another
    club was close.  I'd forgotten that, if I knew it I'd have 'nova in my
    sweet 16.
    
    And I meant the UMass win put GW in.  Beating Louisville will show me
    that UMass is okay.
    
    I can remember one of Walton's teams losing PAC-8 games; conference
    wins can be tough.
77.1337CAMONE::WAYTime to align the data!Wed Feb 15 1995 17:3523
>    I remember Kentucky winning NIT and then NCAA the next year.  Another
>    club was close.  I'd forgotten that, if I knew it I'd have 'nova in my
>    sweet 16.

They never did that in subsequent years.  It happened to Kaintuck twice,
but there was a year separating them:


	NIT 		NCAA

	1946
			1948
			1949
			1951
			1958
	1976
                        1978


hth,
'Saw


77.1338Russ' Comments OminousSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Feb 16 1995 14:1620
      Not having cable, I have not seen a whole lot of UMass this
      year, but I think Russ' comments, if accurate, are the most
      unsettling.
    
      Outside shooting.  UMass has never been able to consistently
      shoot the outside shot.  I thought this year might be different.
      Will it fail us again?  Will UMass get knocked out in the tourna-
      ment as a result of a team that clogs the inside and dares UMass
      to shoot from the outside on a day they can't hit the broad side
      of a barn?
    
      Williams and Bright.  Not good news at all!
    
      Defense.  They HAVE to take advantage of their depth and play
      intense all-out defensive intimidation.
    
      Also, I have to mention Kellog.  I just feel that most top ten teams
      have more capable PG's and this is one very important position.
    
                                                   Tony
77.1339USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 16 1995 14:416
I don't watch them, but I've always believed that a team has to settle
into a strict rotation (ie: clear role definition) come playoff/tournament
time.  This typically means some guys lose minutes, and the bench gets
shorter.  Is this Calipari's way of doing things ?  If not, in a close
game they could find themselves without a go-to style offense coming
down the stretch.
77.1340Kellogg is OK, Williams Isn'tMROA::WILKESThu Feb 16 1995 18:5116
    re 1338
    
    Although he is not flashy I think Derek Kellogg is solid point guard.
    
    I would aim my criticism of the backcourt at Mike Williams. Granted he
    has hit a number of game winning shots but his play over the full
    course of too many games features careless turnovers and lackadasical
    foul shooting. To be a top team you need a lot more consistency from
    your seniors than Mike Williams delivers.
    
    The key for UMass now is not to rush Camby back too fast. It is better
    to sacrifice tourney seeding position to make sure he is healthy before
    he returns to action
    because without Camby UMass is most likely a second round loser.
    
    Lyndon
77.1341MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Feb 16 1995 19:1325
    
   >> Although he is not flashy I think Derek Kellogg is solid point guard.
    
      Kellogg is solid but that's about the full extent of his value.
      He doesn't turn the ball over but neither does he create shots 
      either for himself or his teammates. The next time I see him 
      penetrate and dish will be the first. He also doesn't seem to
      know when to or be able to take the three to open things up. 
      He'll often take only two or three shots in the course of the
      game. Opponents don't fear him. They know they can play cursory
      defense and it will suffice. 

   >> I would aim my criticism of the backcourt at Mike Williams. Granted he
   >> has hit a number of game winning shots but his play over the full
   >> course of too many games features careless turnovers and lackadasical
   >> foul shooting. To be a top team you need a lot more consistency from
   >> your seniors than Mike Williams delivers.
    
      I'd go along with this. Case in point was the big comeback against 
      WVU. Yeah, Mike hit the big shots down the stretch but his sloppy play
      all through the game made the improbable comeback all the more improb-
      able. It really looks like UMass' best lineup is Camby/Roe/Bright/
      Dingle/Kellogg with Padilla spelling Kellogg and Wlliams and Traveiso
      providing perimeter scoring when needed. 
    
77.1342USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 16 1995 19:213
>    The key for UMass now is not to rush Camby back too fast.

USA Today reports that Camby may play Sunday vs. Louisville.
77.1343CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Thu Feb 16 1995 19:235
|     able. It really looks like UMass' best lineup is Camby/Roe/Bright/
|     Dingle/Kellogg with Padilla spelling Kellogg and Wlliams and Traveiso

I hate to see them rely on Dingle too much.  He's matured some this year, but
still looks inconsistent. 
77.1344DID HE PLAY?SUBPAC::MORISSETTEFri Feb 17 1995 11:072
    
    Just heard Camby played last night. Is that True?
77.1345IMBETR::DUPREZFri Feb 17 1995 11:185
Yes, it's True.

11 pts, a couple of blocks, 3(?) rebounds in limited action.  Supposedly
he had a little bit of pain, but it didn't sound bad/serious.
77.1346MROA::RSCHOTTFri Feb 17 1995 11:3423
         Camby did not start, but played 18 minutes and turned in an 11
    point, 3 rebound, 3 blocked shot effort.  According to the Globe, Camby
    reported some pain with his mending hamstring, and was limping at
    times.  I'm sure the team has consulted numerous doctors and trainers
    and received the go ahead to let him return to action, but I'm still
    surprised that he has returned so quickly, if the hamstring is not
    fully healed.  I believe Nazz attended the game, so perhaps he can
    comment on how well Camby was getting up and down the court.
    
         In other news, Mike Williams has been suspended indefinitely from
    the team for breaking team rules.  Supposedly he skipped a practice.
    Calipari will reevaluate the situation after the Louisville game.  Over
    his career, I believe this is the third time Williams has been suspended 
    for disciplinary reasons (not counting his academic suspension at the
    beginning of this season). 
    
         I am one of those of the opinion that it's guard play that
    determines how far a team goes in the NCAA's.  The UMASS backcourt,
    which played well early in the season, has become suspect as of late,
    and is just that much weaker without a focused Mike Williams.
    
    Russ
                              
77.1347Was this too early?HOTLNE::BRIANFri Feb 17 1995 12:157
    Was it really necessary to play Camby last night?  The last time these
    two teams met Umass had an easy win.  Even though he din't play to many 
    minutes, I would think that Calipari would have kept him out a little
    bit longer.  If he re-injures the hamstring Umass would be in some
    serious trouble.
    
    Brian
77.1348CambySTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Feb 17 1995 16:1610
      It would seem to me that Calipari MUST have asked all the 
      medical authorities whether or not the injury had any more
      chance to be aggravated if he played now.
    
      It does happen that an injury is past the stage of being able
      to get aggravated, but still a potential cause of soreness.
    
      If it was safe to say that it probably wouldn't get aggravated,
      Calipari probably wanted some game time in before the Louisville
      game.
77.1349UMass rolls; Williams gone forever?TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Feb 20 1995 13:0716
    UMass looks like they are back in Final Four form after their complete
    destruction of Louisville 91-76.  The Minutemen got balanced scoring,
    led by Lou Roe (21 pts, 8 reb), and the inpsired play of Marcus Camby.
    Marcus had 16 points, but was clearly the inspiration the fueled UMass
    into playing their typical hustle after every loose ball, fight for
    every rebound, dive on the floor style of play that had been somewhat
    lacking recently.
    
    Donta Bright had 13, Kellogg 11, Padilla 9, Weeks and Dingle 8, and
    Travieso 5 as just about everyone played well.
    
    UMass once again played without Mike Williams, who it looks like is
    finished playing for UMass.  Coach Cal apparently has had enough of
    Williams' act, and his suspension may never be lifted.
    
    NAZZ
77.1350USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 20 1995 14:116
>    UMass once again played without Mike Williams, who it looks like is
>    finished playing for UMass.  Coach Cal apparently has had enough of
>    Williams' act, and his suspension may never be lifted.

Enough of his act, until he needs a clutch shot at the end of the next
close game.
77.1351Details of Williams saga?AKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeMon Feb 20 1995 14:114
    The globe had a reference to a suit and involvement by William's
    parents; also Mike's claim that he was suspended for "nothing".
    
    	Anyone know the story behind the story?
77.1352MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Feb 20 1995 14:1616

      The UMass bandwagon is bursting at the seams. I've been going 
     to the Centrum since it opened and I've never seen anything like
     the mob scene at all the taverns and restaurants near the Centrum
     yesterday. It felt like Opening Day at Fenway. Any place that had 
     a UMass flag outside or in one case a UMASS #1 ice sculpture pract-
     ically had a license to print money. There was more UMass gear being 
     worn and sold yesterday than the UMass merchandise receipts for the 
     entire '80s. For the time being at least, UMass owns the local basket-
     ball universe. BC may have an advantage being in metro Boston but
     UMass has the alumni numbers and a much better team. Yesterday's
     atmosphere around the Centrum was as big as college b-ball gets
     around here without the tourney being in town and it was nice to
     witness so much life being breathed into downtown Worcester if
     only for a day.
77.1353Go MinutemenAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeMon Feb 20 1995 14:3213
    BC has never owned Boston college basketball and college basketball has
    never sold in Boston.  Worcester and Providence DO college basketball;
    Boston talks it a little.
    
    BC with Adams beat Georgetown with Ewing on several occasions, made the
    ncaa final eight three times but barely made a puff of smoke around
    here.  The globe sports page had UMass featured like a Patriots game
    which is for the Globe going bananas - and BC hardly got that kind of
    print by beating NC.
    
    Though Conneticut rooters will never catch minuteman fever, most
    college basketball fans of greater Boston are embracing UMass with no
    qualms.
77.1354USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 20 1995 14:576
>    BC has never owned Boston college basketball
>    BC with Adams beat Georgetown with Ewing on several occasions, made the
>    ncaa final eight three times but barely made a puff of smoke

I can't agree with this.  Every time BC has advanced deep into the NCAA
tourney they've got big press.
77.1355Game ThoughtsSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Feb 20 1995 14:5828
      After watching the game yesterday (and in light of observations
      in this topic), I was especially glad about Donta Bright's play.
      He was often around the ball; did a lot of 'little things', even
      helping to bring the ball up the floor.
    
      We all know about Camby and Roe and they looked fine.  My main 
      concern was perimeter shooting; sometimes it was there, sometimes
      it wasn't.  I saw some suspect outside shooting out there(at times).
    
      I don't think the game was really as close as the score.  UMass
      dominated on the boards and in probably every intangible.  
      Louisville seemed to knock down a couple treys to keep it in the
      10 to 15 point range.  Louisville looked about as weak as I've
      ever seen them, but maybe part of that was UMass' doing.
    
      I can't help wondering about what Williams did to cause the 
      suspension.  And I sure hope the thing about Andre Burks is just
      rumor with no substance.
    
      An added by the way, Weeks will be worth a good five fouls come
      tourney time.  He can lean his 240+ pounds and supply good play
      all the while tiring opposing front lines.
    
      Finally, Dingle and Bright can both play off guard, right?  And
      Padilla has played at the point, so if Williams is indeed out for
      good, I think they'll manage. 
    
                                                        Tony 
77.1356MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Feb 20 1995 15:028
    
      Largely true, billthe but BC was never pre-season Top 5 nor
     ever ranked #1. If the roles were rversed and it was BC with 
     all the talent and the ranking I don't know that the atmosphere
     around the arena yesterday would have been any different. The 
     expectations for UMass have been built up over the last few years
     and are now peaking. BC never really had a stretch like Coach
     Cal has put together at UMass. 
77.1357The Williams SagaMROA::RSCHOTTMon Feb 20 1995 15:4641
    > "I can't help wondering what Williams did to cause the suspension"
    
         From piecing together the various stories, first Mike Williams
    "violated" an informal curfew while in Louisiana.  Calipari had told
    the team it was time to "take care of their bodies" given that the
    Tourney was approaching and that they were generally tired and beat up.
    By that statement, I believe he expected them to get adequate rest.
    Andre Burks, who is injured, and who hails from Baton Rouge, invited
    Mike Williams to go home with him, evidently without permission from
    the coaches.  Its unclear if they made a side trip to N'awlins!
    
         After both Williams and Burks were read the riot act for the 
    Louisiana incident, the team returned to Amherst, and Williams missed
    a team breakfast, last Wednesday.  According to Williams he told the
    Team Manager (or was it the trainer) he wasn't feeling well, and tried
    to call the coaches, but didn't get through to them.  Calipari then
    indefinitely suspended Williams, just prior to the Duquesne game, and
    Williams then compounded his problems, by spouting off to the press
    about unfair treatment.
    
         The talk at the Centrum yesterday, and on the radio show after the
    game was that everyone associated with the team has had enough of Mike
    Williams.  Short of profuse apologies to the coaches and his teammates,
    I think we've seen the last of Mike Williams.  This is too bad for
    Williams because he has had a productive (albeit mercurial) career for
    the Minutemen.  Next Tuesday night is senior night at Mullins where the
    players and their parents are honored, (his parents attend most games)
    and it looks like he won't be participating.
    
        Will the team miss him?  By all accounts he has had a very 
    inconsistent senior season, especially against A10 opponents.  His
    three best games were early in the season, against Maryland, Western
    Kentucky and St.Louis.  Lately he has played poor defense, shot poorly
    and turned the ball over.  Perhaps some of his outburst can be
    contributed to frustration at his poor play and limited minutes.  I do 
    know this however, when he is playing well, he is the only UMASS guard 
    who can make offense for himself by dribble penetration, either going
    to the hoop or pulling up for the "J".  There will be a game or games 
    in the next couple of weeks, where he will be missed.
    
    Russ
77.1358"Acknowlegde Mike Williams"AKOCOA::TROYMon Feb 20 1995 16:0322
    re: Mike Williams.
    
    IMHO - whether or not he plays again for UMASS - he should be honored
    at Senior's night.  He has been in a pain in the butt - but he has also
    has added a lot to the team in big wins - and really getting UMASS to
    go over the top in key close games - UNC, Temple, etc.  Each time he
    has gotten into trouble he has been suspended, benched, etc., but I
    think that Calipari will look petty to not acknoweldge his contributions
    over the past 4 years.
    
    Regarding BC or UMASS as most favored for local bball - the sad fact is
    that the pros rule locally. UMASS or BC BBall coverage is as much a
    testimate to the poor play of the Celtics - going no where, as anyhting
    else.  If the Celts were good - College bball press would plummet.
    
    And, forget the coverage if a local team is not on top - in tv and
    print. College hoop fans often see games blacked out on Boston
    affiliates if it does not directly involves local interest. 
    
    As a true native Bostonian, born and raised, and big college bball fan,
    It pains me to pronounce this area as the most parochial, professional ball team
    oriented sports town in America.  Thank God for cable!!!!!!!
77.1359TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Mon Feb 20 1995 17:2519
    
    
    
    	Here's the latest A-10 standings. Who do you
    think will get the invites to the Big Dance???
    
    	Who does GW and St B's have left to play???
    
                          W   L   Pct.  W   L  Pct.
    Massachusetts        10   2  .833  20   3  .870
    George Wash.          9   4  .692  16  10  .615
    St. Bonaventure       9   5  .643  17   9  .654
    Temple                7   5  .583  14   8  .636
    St. Joseph's          7   6  .538  14   9  .609
    Rutgers               5   7  .417  10  12  .455
    West Virginia         5   8  .385  11  11  .500
    Duquesne              5   9  .357   8  15  .348
    Rhode Island          1  12  .077   5  17  .227
    
77.1360WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MJAN,279,270,267,264.230 OR BUSTMon Feb 20 1995 17:286
     
    
       UMass
       GW
       and the Bonnies if they win their remaining games.
    
77.1361MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Feb 21 1995 11:552
	UMass and either GW or St.Bonaventure, depending on the results
	of the A-10 tournament.
77.1362Our Mike is Precious!HOTLNE::BRIANTue Feb 21 1995 14:0812
    The parents of Mike Williams held a press conference yesterday.  They
    feel that the suspension is too harsh.  they also mention that their
    son is under different rules than other players.
    
    However, Al Williams said he did not feel that race was an issue.
    
    
    I think it would be in the best interest of UMASS and Calipari to come
    forth and explain the reasoning behind the suspension.
    
    Brian
    
77.1363Williams/#1 Falls (again)STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Tue Feb 21 1995 14:5414
      Well, the local papers are all mentioning Michael Williams.
      It seems his parents went to the media and exhorted Calipari
      to reinstate their son.  Also, it is reported that Williams
      wrote a letter of apology to the coach.
    
      I wonder if that will be enough.
    
      ***************************************************************
    
      Again, the #1's fall.  Kansas goes down at Norman, Oklahoma.
      Villanova gets trounced by Georgetown.  That one really surprised
      me.
    
                                                   Tony
77.1364Up to his teammates if Williams comes backTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Tue Feb 21 1995 16:1315
    Reportedly Williams picked a fight with one of his teammates. 
    Unbelievably, that teammate was Lou Roe!  No wonder the rest of the
    team didn't want anything to do with him!  This allegedly occurred
    after the GW loss lasted Tuesday when Williams took offense at some
    questioning of the guards' shot selection by Roe.  WIlliams hauled off
    and nailed Roe, then Lou retaliated.
    
    How bright could Williams be to go after Roe?
    
    IMO, Calipari should NOT reinstate Williams unless the team first
    agrees to take him back.  Team chemistry is too fragile to fool with,
    and if his teammates don't want him back, Coach Cal should listen to
    them.
    
    NAZZ
77.1365MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Feb 21 1995 17:3419
    
  >> Reportedly Williams picked a fight with one of his teammates. 
  >> Unbelievably, that teammate was Lou Roe!  No wonder the rest of the
  >> team didn't want anything to do with him!  This allegedly occurred
  >> after the GW loss lasted Tuesday when Williams took offense at some
  >> questioning of the guards' shot selection by Roe.  WIlliams hauled off
  >> and nailed Roe, then Lou retaliated.
    
     I think the animosity between Roe and Williams goes back at least to
     the come from behind win at West Virginia. In the post game interview
     after that win, Roe was asked about Mike Williams' clutch play. Lou 
     seemed reluctant at first and then gave a rote "Mike Williams is Mike 
     Williams" answer which sounded like it was about as nice a thing as 
     he could think to say. I don't think Lou was too happy with Mike's
     play then or since. Marcus Camby too dismissed the absence of Williams
     after the Louisville game saying that they are used to pulling to-
     gether because that's what they did when Williams was suspened at
     the beginning of the season. I think if they were to hold a team
     vote, Wlliams would not be asked back.
77.1366At Least Team Unified ThenSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Wed Feb 22 1995 15:086
      I guess we should find out today about William's permanent 
      status?
    
      .1364 was shocking to me, but on the good side, it is evidence
      that it wasn't just a coach's thing and team unity has not been
      sacrificed by suspending Williams.
77.1367Williams is doneHOTLNE::BRIANThu Feb 23 1995 11:423
    The Boston Herald reports that Williams basketball career at Umass is
    officially over.  He will still be able to keep his scholarship and
    finish his education.
77.1368HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Feb 23 1995 12:2310
  So what's going on with Williams? The Boston Globe seemed to be trying to
remain politically removed and didn't really dig into the story. 

  The coach seems to be saying he was late for a meeting and didn't follow some
rules. There's also talk of low scores. His father says that other players were
late for meetings but unlike Williams they were not suspended. 

  Anyone got more info?

  George
77.1369All in all another black eye for UMassAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeThu Feb 23 1995 12:5011
    I managed to get the kitchen radio tuned to Teddy-baby last night and
    he was discussing this in detail but I didn't hear anything that wasn't
    already posted in this note.
    
    I agree with Cal'pri that Williams contributions are no longer critical
    and his suspension won't hurt and may help the team (I thought Padilla
    was his best guard two months ago).
    
    I have a little problem with the suspension occurring at the time that
    his physical, playing contribution has decreased...ie Did he get away
    with his nonsense as long as the shots were falling?
77.1370What's going on????GRANPA::TMARTINThu Feb 23 1995 14:309
    I don't like this at all.  From what I've read I didn't see any 
    justification for kicking him off of the team with just a few games
    left in his college career.  I'm sure that Mike is devistated by this
    action and I really feel for him.  Something else must be going on
    here that is not coming out.
    
    What's the deal here.
    
    Thomas 
77.1371"sad"MKOTS3::KCUMMINGSThu Feb 23 1995 15:1514
    
    
    Agreed, too many coaches in both the High School and College level take
    this type of action against kids.
    
    I realize that he probably did something that was in coach Cal's eyes 
    inexcusable but, to throw a kids career away...is sad.
    
    In my estimation this is the easy way out for the coach.  Everything
    blows over in a few weeks and the headaches gone.
    
    What happened to the days when coaches really took interest in a kid
    and worked with there parents as well as the student to help them
    trouugh?
77.1372DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFleet ForumThu Feb 23 1995 15:485
    	Calipari's job is to win basketball games, not wetnurse some
    egotistical headcase.  It sure appears that the rest of the team
    has no problem with Williams being tossed.
    
    				   /Don
77.1373TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Thu Feb 23 1995 16:0119
    
    
    	Calipari has been dealing with Williams for 4 years now, and
    has constantly been giving the kid 'breaks'. At some point, he had
    to say enough is enough and punt the guy off the team. He has a bunch
    of underclassmen watching how he handles discipline. Williams would
    have been gone after this season, but he may have other potential
    problems sitting on the bench in the future thinking "Williams got
    away with it, now I can too...."
    
    	And Calipari didn't 'throw away" Williams career. Williams played 
    almost 4 complete seasons at UMass. He's only losing the last 3 or 4
    weeks. He has to deal with the disappointment of sitting out the last
    month of his senior season. Maybe he'll come to grips with why it was
    done. Plus Williams still has his scholarship through the end of the
    academic year.
    
    	JimH
    
77.1374USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 23 1995 16:271
Who'll take the big shot at the end of a close game now ?
77.1375CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHPotty training is hell!!!Thu Feb 23 1995 16:2910
    
|    	Calipari has been dealing with Williams for 4 years now, and
|    has constantly been giving the kid 'breaks'. At some point, he had

To me, this is key.  If the things that came out this week were isolated
incidents, it would be one thing, but it appears the kids was simply unable to
grasp the notion that he was on a team, working towards a common goal - winning
a national champeenship.

=bob=
77.1376"Huh"?MKOTS3::KCUMMINGSThu Feb 23 1995 17:088
    
    
    re: Calipari's job is to win Championships?
    
    I don't think that's what the Dean's job descriptions states??
    
    So, what your saying is that it's more important to win games then 
    help the student along as a person?
77.1377IMBETR::DUPREZThu Feb 23 1995 17:1611
RE: .1376

1) they're not mutually exclusive (see Duke)

2) not that I have first-hand knowledge, but the rumblings seen in the
   press are that this is for stuff over the last four years.  If this is
   true, then you could argue that you can try to help one student, but after a 
   certain point it may hinder others.  Also, although I hate to admit it,
   Calipari is human like everyone else, and he may have just had enough.

Roland
77.1378Seemed Kind'a Chronic...and Thats Important!STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Thu Feb 23 1995 19:5415
      re: .1375
    
      EXACTLY.
    
      From what I heard, the problems were kind of chronic.  In which 
      case, if you analyze from the perspective of weighing one single
      isolated incident, you're missing the boat.
     
      Its not that he did this certain thing _one time_.  Its that he
      seemed to do it all the time.
    
      I heard that he basically usurped Calipari's authority as common
      practise.
    
                                                    Tony
77.1379BIGQ::MCKAYFri Feb 24 1995 11:236
    UMASS is dropping like a rock.  I've certainly seen them play better.
    Losing 3 games to the likes of GW and Temple (bubble teams at best)
    has got to hurt their seed.  The best they can do now is a 3 with
    a 4 more likely.  Temple fans were an excitable crowd.....
    
    Jimbo
77.1380TLE::PHILLIPSFri Feb 24 1995 12:385
It would seem that kicking anyone off the team is the last thing
Calipari would want to do ... especially when the team is among a
group of 10 or so teams that could win the NCAA. I'd bet there was
more to this than was reported.
77.1381MKFSA::LONGLet your tongue hang out. Stay cool.Fri Feb 24 1995 12:448
    >The Boston Herald reports that Williams basketball career at Umass is
    >officially over. 
    
    This is a little unclear to me.  Was it the player/student's decision
    ot the coach's?
    
    
    billl
77.1382Closer to Dropping Out of Top 10 AltogetherSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Fri Feb 24 1995 19:193
      Not real stellar guard play...to say the least.  UMass lacks
      a consistent perimeter scoring threat.  What did Kellog/Padilla/
      Traveiso total?  I think it was 9 points!!
77.1383"ooops - time for Jason at guard?"AKOCOA::TROYFri Feb 24 1995 21:3111
    Guard play ... what guard play?  The turnovers were bad - the trey
    shooting was really poor. if not for Camby/Roe - not close at any
    juncture.  Not to panic, as I am sure that the Williams controversy
    took its toll, but the absence of Burks also hurts the speed and ball
    handling.
    
    We will see zones and 5 guys in the paint until the guard play
    dramatically improves on offense and/or the defensive pressure starts
    to yield fast breaks.  UMASS is having trouble in the 1/2 court game.
    
    Third seed is a real probability now.  
77.1384#2 Seed Still RealisticMROA::WILKESMon Feb 27 1995 13:3915
    Even though they have definitely been playing sluggish of late, they
    still have a good chance of getting one of the last two second seeds.
    Most of the teams ahead of them will face tougher competition in thier
    Conference tournaments and therefore are more likely to pickup another
    loss. Temple's win over GW pretty much closes out the possibility that
    UMass would have had to play the A-10 Tournament Championship game at
    GW.
    
    The one positive I have seen in recent games is the improved play of
    Tyrone Weeks. He is a real wide-body which will come in useful against
    some teams in the tourney. ( The new Fleet Forum should really shake
    next December when Weeks and Danya Abrams collide )
    
    I can't believe how often Marcus Camby comes down with stomach viruses.
    Does anybody at UMass watch what he eats.
77.1385camby has straw fever?AKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeMon Feb 27 1995 14:3111
    Fleet Forum - that's not official yet, I hope
    
    Don't underestimate Temple - replacing Jones etal was tough but they
    again have the tough inside game, I don't know any team that would've
    been a good bet at Temple.  I'd like for the sake of A10 to see the
    Owls in the ncaas but only a top 2 in tourney will get them there; ncaa
    power structure probably doesn't want to see them in there threatening
    their precious North Carolinas,Kansas and UCLAs.
    
    Virus?  I read in SI Wally Backman's Daryl Str'by observation: "Sick 25
    times?  No one gets sick 25 times in one year!"
77.1386CAMONE::WAYStrokin' my Ito beardMon Feb 27 1995 14:375
>    Fleet Forum - that's not official yet, I hope
    
Yeah, I agree.

To me, Fleet are the folks who make enemas.....
77.1387Go UMass!!!TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Mon Feb 27 1995 15:5317
    
    
    
    	I'm sure you all we be thrilled to hear that "Your-other-State-U"
    UMass-Dartmouth won its third straight Little East Conference
    Championship this weekend. A 101-80 blowout of W. Conn. State in the
    finals of the conference championship earned the Corsairs an automatic
    berth in the NCAA Div 3 tourny....
    
    	Maybe there is a chance for a UMass National Championship after
    all!!! :-)
    
    JimH - SMU (now UMass-Dartmouth) '79
    
    
    
    
77.1388Five teams in post-season play for the A-10TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Feb 27 1995 17:0112
    It's obvious to me that Temple is already in the tourney.  I would not
    be surprised to see them as high as a #7 or #8 seed.  The seeding 
    committee likes teams that play a tough schedule and are hot going into
    the tourney, and Temple is both of those.
    
    GW is probably in too, but a first round A-10 tourney upset could put
    them on the bubble.  I look for them to be around a 10th seed.
    
    St. Bonnies would have to upset UMass in the A-10 semis to get a bid.
    St. Joe's is going to be in the NIT.
    
    NAZZ
77.1389TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Mon Feb 27 1995 17:1010
    
    
    	The selection committee has got to like how Temple has
    finished the season on a roll. I think they are in.
    
    	St. Bonnie lost to URI last week. I think they need to 
    make the A10 finals to get a selection now....
    
    JimH
    
77.1390You can have your version as propagandized, I'll stay with mineAKOCOA::BREENThat is enough for me and for theeMon Feb 27 1995 18:3712
    I'm sorry but the true selection rationale of ncaa is typically
    questionable.  In '93 Providence was a roaring lion full of potential
    nbaers and ripe to knock off any number of ncaa pet teams.  They were
    shunted off to the nit along with Minnesota and these two played a
    final four caliber game in the semis.
    
    Meanwhile a weak pitt team was sent of to provide token opposition. 
    NCAA negotiations were at a critical stage with networks and it was
    imperative that a "dream" final four (NC,Mich,Kans/Duke,Kentucky) be
    showcased.  
    
    There was no room for a spoiler.
77.1391MROA::RSCHOTTWed Mar 01 1995 11:4562
         UMASS clinched the A10 regular season title for the fourth
    consecutive year, as they defeated URI, 86-71, last night at the
    Mullins Center.  Some highlights:
    
    * It was senior night, and just prior to the introduction of the four
      remaining seniors, Calipari took the mike and asked for some
      recognition of the contribution Mike Williams made to the program.
      A 90 second standing O followed.  Not surprisingly, neither Williams
      nor his parents seemed to be in attendance.  Supposedly Williams has
      been invited in to the Portsmouth Invitational (NBA tryout tourney)
      and Calipari has set up a try out for him with the Raptors through Stu
      Jackson.  My take is that Mike Williams professional future will be
      in Rapid City or Des Moines (CBA) or Manila/Milan/Malmo, overseas.
    
    * None of the four seniors played particularly well, though Lou Roe
      collected his 1000th career rebound, joining Julius Erving as the
      only UM'ie to achieve such distinction.  Of course, the Doctor did it
      in two years (albeit against the likes of Springfield and St.
      Michaels (and BC and UCONN ;^)!)) whereas Lou took four years to
      hit 1000, against the likes of Temple, North Carolina, Arkansas,
      Maryland, and GWU.
    
    * Walk-on Jason Germain started, and despite everyone's best efforts
      to get him some points, he put up a goose-egg in the box score,
      even though he put up five or so shots.  He didn't turn the ball over
      though, and made some nice passes.
    
    * Camby put up some nice numbers, 21 pts, 8 rebs, 4 blocks, 2 steals!
      His best skills by far are his ability to run the court, and his
      quick first step when putting the ball on the floor and coming in from 
      the wing.  Of course his shot blocking isn't too bad either.  Clearly 
      his future will be as a Shawn Kemp/Larry Nance/Cliff Robinson type power
      forward.
    
    * Remember the name, Tyson Wheeler.  Wheeler, a true freshman from
      New London, Ct., lit up the Minutemen for 33 points last night.
      While he is not quite Alan Iverson, the kid can play with a capital
      "P".  I wonder how Jimmy Calhoun let him get away.  Maybe he should
      stop racking up frequent flyer miles with recruiting trips to Tel
      Aviv and Washington State, and concentrate on the I-91 corridor!
    
    * Strangely, the crowd wasn't into the game last night.  My wife
      (ever the observer of the human psyche) remarked that the team had
      little emotion either, on what should have been a very emotional
      night.  Perhaps the roller coaster year, that has included the GPA
      scandal, the Arkansas and Maryland wins, a tiring trip to France 
      during semester break, the four weeks as No. 1, and the Mike Williams
      affair has taken its toll.
    
    * My wife also remarked that it looked like Calipari's assistants were
      dipping into Coach Cal's Closet .... not the stores in Amherst or at
      JC Penny's, but rather his bedroom closet in Shutesbury!  Calipari
      and each of the assists were wearing, nearly identical, light colored
      green/grey suits!   Clones one and all!
    
    * Next up for UMASS, the continuation of the Rutgers game at 4 p.m.
      on Friday, at the Spectrum.  Then on Sunday, the Minutemen will play
      the winner of the Duquesne/URI game in the first round of the A10 
      Tourney.  A win there will move them along to the winner of the 
      4th/5th seed game, either St.Joe's or St.Bonaventure.
    
    Russ                              
77.1392MROA::WILKESWed Mar 01 1995 13:3310
    re. 1391
    
    I agree Mike Williams has CBA written all over him.
    
    I hope Camby puts in one more year at UMass. He still has a lot of
    rough edges and needs to put on some more muscle before he would remind
    anyone of Shawn Kemp. On the other hand he is has as much agility and
    quickness for someone his height that I ever seen. I have never forgotton
    him jumping over a defender on a breakaway basket in the tourney loss
    to Maryland last year.
77.1393Camby could benefit from another year just to get strongerTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Wed Mar 01 1995 16:216
    I used to compare Camby's professional future to a Larry Nance type -
    fluid game, runs the court, blocks shots, skinny 6-11.  But lately,
    with all his injuries and illnesses, I've been thinking of him as
    another Pervis Ellison!
    
    NAZZ
77.1394CNTROL::CHILDSMelrose Place &gt; FriendsThu Mar 02 1995 13:347
 Say goodbye Marcus. A report I read this morning in the paper said that
 Camby told Coach Cal after the game the other night that it was his
 'senior' night as well. I guess he figures he may as well get his bucks 
 before he gets permantly injuried......

 mike
77.1395MROA::RSCHOTTThu Mar 02 1995 14:0918
         Although I am one of the most ardent UMASS fans around and about,
    I will not be a bit surprised, nor blame Marcus Camby one bit if
    he takes the money and runs, following this, his sophomore year.  If
    I was talented enough to be in a similar position it would be
    absolutely a no-brainer.  The diminution of his potential career earnings 
    due to a rookie salary cap makes the choice simple.  Would his game
    benefit from additional seasoning in the college ranks ..... of course.
    But given that knowledgeable basketball people have labeled him as a
    lottery pick WHENEVER he comes out, he should maximize his earnings
    potential.
    
          Depending on how this salary cap business plays out, there could
    be a mass exodus of underclassmen to the NBA draft, after the NCAA 
    Tourney, and UMASS won't be the only school affected.
    
          I am curious though Mike, in which paper was this story reported?
    
    Russ                                         
77.1396USCTR1::GARBARINODean &gt; BumhiemThu Mar 02 1995 14:492
Like Gary Williams said of Joe Smith's likely departure, "how can I say
he should stay when someone is offering him $60M ?".
77.1397either that or it's a bad rumorCNTROL::CHILDSMelrose Place &gt; FriendsThu Mar 02 1995 15:148
 It was in the Worcester Telegram and Gazette and kind of obscure. Billy
 Doyle usually covers the TV broadcasting aspects of sports and today his
 columun was about the Golf Channel but the last paragraph was about what
 Camby told Cal. So I suspect that they're trying to keep it hush hush and 
 he just didn't want to sit on it? 

 mike
77.1398the quote was attributed to Lou RoeWRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatFri Mar 03 1995 13:2719
To be honest with you, I think the quote came from a confusing
radio broadcast following the game (WHMP 99.3).

After every game Calipari goes on the radio with the WHMP announcers and
talks about the game. After last Tuesday's game, Calipari had begun a sentence
by talking about Marcus Camby and then in the same breath talked about
playing time in the game. He said something about "he reminded me it was his
Senior night and not to forget about putting me back in the game". The way it
sounded, it was a bit confusing about who Calipari was talking about.

When hearing this, I, too, did a double take and wondered whether Calipari 
was talking about Marcus Camby. I listened closely from then on and it was 
more apparent that Calipari was talking about Lou Roe (though I can't remember
exectly what he said that implied it was Lou Roe and not Camby).

My take on it is that the reporter heard the same post-game Calipari interview,
heard the quote, and thought he was talking about Camby.

Chris
77.1399USCTR1::GARBARINODean &gt; BumhiemFri Mar 03 1995 18:561
Anyone got a final from today's UMass-Rutgers game ?
77.1400Tonight: UMass vs St, Joes; Temple vs RutgersTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Mar 06 1995 13:1517
    UMass cruised past Duquesne lasted night, winning by only 26.  Lou Roe
    dominated the game inside, with 20 points and 8 rebounds.  UMass turned
    it on early in the second half behind a great performance by Derek
    Kellogg (4 of 5 3-pointers, 16 points, 6 assists, 0 turnovers), got
    the lead as high as 32, and coasted.  My man Rigo even hit a 3!!!
    
    Next up for UMass is St. Joseph's tonight at 7.  The Hawks beat St.
    Bonaventure in double OT.  The Bonnies blew a 16 point lead with less
    than 6 minutes left in regulatiopn.  They missed four straight FT in
    the last minute of reg., then failed to get off a shot after St. Joe's
    tied it with 5.4 seconds left.  In the 1st OT, the Bonnies missed three
    more FT, and in the second OT, with four players fouled out (Blunt,
    Bass, Domani, and Bey), some freshman who didn't play until the second
    OT hit two big jumpers for St. Joe's.  This game, plus GW's loss to
    lowly Rutgers, should put the Hawks into the NCAA and GW into the NIT.
    
    NAZZ
77.1401MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Mar 06 1995 13:249
>    OT hit two big jumpers for St. Joe's.  This game, plus GW's loss to
>    lowly Rutgers, should put the Hawks into the NCAA and GW into the NIT.
>    
>    NAZZ

     Your dreaming.  UMass and Temple go to the NCAAs, unless St Jos or
     Rutgers win the tournament.  Xavier and Santa Clara have already scarfed
     up two of the 4-5 unclaimed at-large bids, and their are A LOT of teams
     better than St Jos for those last 2-3 bids.
77.1402RPI index is a plus for the HawksTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Mar 06 1995 13:5610
    St. Joe's is #45 in the latest RPI, and that's before the win over the
    Bonnies.  If they lose tonight, they finish at 17-11, which should put
    them in decent shape, unless there are more upsets, which of course is
    definitely possible.
    
    Compare the Hawks with Iowa for example.  Iowa is 18-10 or so, but
    their RPI index is in the mid 70s.  Unless Iowa sweeps their last two
    Big Ten games, they will be in the NIT.
    
    NAZZ
77.1403No great team in Big10, but several very goodPOBOX::WIERSBECKMon Mar 06 1995 16:188
    Re:  Iowa
    
    Depends.  If they win their last two, they're in.  If they split they
    may still be in, based on 9-9 in the Big10.  9-9 makes it many times. 
    Wisconsin made it in a couple years ago at 8-10.
    
    
    Spud
77.1404Looking AheadSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Mar 06 1995 18:2311
      Admittedly, I am looking beyond St. Joe's.  Boy, this Temple
      game will be BIG!  I hope they win by a good 13 and cruise
      into the NCAA's on a high.
    
      I also hope their 2nd round opponent isn't an ACC team!!
    
      BTW, speaking of our last two teams that knocked us out of
      the tourney, Virginia blasted Maryland something like 92-67!
      Those teams are dangerous.
    
                                                  Tony
77.1405USCTR1::GARBARINODean &gt; BumhiemMon Mar 06 1995 18:397
>      Admittedly, I am looking beyond St. Joe's.  Boy, this Temple
>      game will be BIG!  I hope they win by a good 13 and cruise
>      into the NCAA's on a high.

In an interview last week (after they clinched the A-10 title) Kellogg
said they weren't looking at winning the A-10 as a big achievement...
they were looking to the NCAA tournament more.
77.1406UMass-Temple once again - Thursday night at the Mullins CenterTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Tue Mar 07 1995 12:2323
    UMass, with its 68-57 win over St. Joe's last night, is now in position 
    to become only the seconds school in NCAA history to win its league title 
    and conference tournament four years in a row.  North Carolina State 
    accomplished this feat in the laste 40s.
    
    As for the game, the Minutemen responded to a 9-0 St. Joe's run that 
    opened the second half with poise and determination, two strong points 
    that will help this veteran team in the NCAAs.  Scoring was spread around 
    pretty evenly, with Padilla and Bright leaading the team with 12 each.  
    Lou Roe had 11 points and 11 rebounds.  Camby had 5 blocks to go with his 
    9 points.
    
    UMass will face Tample in the A-10 tourney title game for the third
    year in a row.  The Owls squeezed past lowly Rutgers 47-42, scoring the
    last five points of the game.  Temple is now 19-9 and a sure bet for 
    the tourney.
    
    Dick Vitale was insisting that GW is a lock for the tourney but I
    don't agree.  They have 13 losses, which offset good wins against
    Syracuse and Memphis.  St. Joe's has a win over Villanova, aa good RPI
    ranking and only 11 losses.  I think they'd get the 3rd A-10 bid.
    
    NAZZ
77.1407USCTR1::GARBARINODean &gt; BumhiemTue Mar 07 1995 14:228
>    UMass, with its 68-57 win over St. Joe's last night, is now in position 
>    to become only the seconds school in NCAA history to win its league title 
>    and conference tournament four years in a row.  North Carolina State 
>    accomplished this feat in the laste 40s.

Another indication of A-10 mediocrity.  They'll probably run this streak
into the foreseeable future.  Imagine if Temple had gotten the invite into
the BE ?
77.1408A-10 > than BE nexted yearTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Tue Mar 07 1995 15:0912
    Temple is a program that will always field a quality team.  The two
    teams that the Big (L)east did take, Rutgers and West Virginia, are
    both programs on the downslide. Of the five teams that the A-10
    has coming in  two are excellent teams having solid years (Xavier and
    Virginia Tech), two are teams with strong basketball traditions (LaSalle 
    and Dayton), and one is a have-not from a non-scholarship league (Fordham).
    The overall result is a stronger A-10 with much more depth, while the
    Big (L)east, with Notre Dame in addition to the A-10 dropouts, has just
    become unwieldy.
    
    NAZZ
    
77.1409BIGQ::MCKAYTue Mar 07 1995 16:075
    Nazz your a riot.....
    
    really loved the A-10 and the depth word in the same sentence.
    
    Jimbo
77.1410Dayton FlyersLUDWIG::BARBIERIGod cares.Tue Mar 07 1995 16:151
      What's Dayton's record this year???
77.1411MOVMON::DAVISFri Mar 10 1995 17:196
    Anybody else wait in line for an hour for their reserved tickets and
    miss most of the first half of the game last night?
    
    They really gotta fix that system.  3 windows, hundreds of people,
    checking IDs and looking for your tickets from the big pile ("What is
    your middle initial Mr. Smith?")
77.1412Game was great, though - almost worth t wait!TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Fri Mar 10 1995 18:529
    Yeah - but I was only out in the cold for 45 minutes!  Got in with
    about 15 minutes to spare.  That was an incredibly stupid system. 
    People could just sneak in on the left pretending theey were Temple
    will call people and cut right over to the UMass ticket line.  I
    finally had enough and cursed out one idiot trying to get through. 
    Told him no, I wouldn't excuse him, and to get the *^&%$# outside and
    freeze like the rest of us did.
    
    NAZZ
77.1413"Where was Temple Last night?"AKOCOA::TROYFri Mar 10 1995 20:3319
    How about the game?
    
    Temple really did not seem 'into' the game last night - they did not
    have the same grabbing for loose balls amd energy - UMASS seemed to
    win most of those. They looked undermanned for the first time in
    memory.  UMASS looked very good - especially in turning around the
    outside game.  No need for Mike last night.
    
    Mike Francesca from WFAN was on Imus this am - he was mentioned that
    UMASS's RPI rated a number one seed, but that people do not like
    Calipari and his style and he would not get the votes to be a number
    one seed.  There is an ABC news excerpt coming on UMASS and Calipari
    according to the Globe, which will discuss lenient admissions standards
    as the way he has made the program come to the fore so quickly.
    
    IMHO, we have proven we can dominate during the season - we have not
    proven the tournament stamina to handle the pressure.  What will a
    successful tournament run look like for UMASS?  ELite 8 or else? Few
    people seem to be saying Final Four. 
77.1414Somebody get Shaughnessy a hankie!!!TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Mar 13 1995 13:0910
    Excellent seeding for UMass.  Staying in the East is great, not being
    the #1 seed is OK, too, and having Coach Cal not invite the Globe into
    his house last night was the frosting on the cake.  Reading poor Danny
    boy's article in the Globe today about how mean Coach Cal wouldn't let
    him in the house last night was priceless!!!  I've never read such
    great whining in my life!!!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  
    AH,HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    HEE-HEE-HEE-HEE-HEE-HEE-HEE-HEE-HEE-!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    NAZZ
77.1415CNTROL::CHILDSEnd Corporate Welfare Instead!Mon Mar 13 1995 13:135
 I'd rather they didn't have to face Nova if they both get that far. UMASS'
 guards won't be able to handle Kittles......

 mike
77.1416MROA::RSCHOTTMon Mar 13 1995 13:349
         Villanova will be a tough opponent, but UMASS matches up fairly 
    well with the Wildcats.  Also, look for Dana Dingle, probably the best
    6'6" defender in the A-10 matching up with Kittles, and Kellogg taking
    Eric Eberz.
    
    Russ
    
    - all of the above, of course depending on both teams advancing thru
    their respective opening round games!
77.1417SNAX::ERICKSONBustings over, changed again..Mon Mar 13 1995 14:087
    
    	Who does Villanova have to stop Camby and Roe? Barring an upset
    Umass should make it to the Sweet 16 against Villanova. With the
    winner taking on Wake Forest. To see who wins the East. Out West
    it could be UCLA against UCONN to see who goes to the final 4.
    	How much hype will there be if UMASS wins the East and UCONN
    wins the West?  
77.1418EDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityMon Mar 13 1995 14:186
    Hell, even Lou Holtz let Danny Boy into his home.  If Holtz is the 
    Debil Incarnate, what does that make Calipari?
    
    glenn
    
77.1419SMART2::CHILDSEnd Corporate Welfare Instead!Mon Mar 13 1995 14:195
 Lawson, Kourtngay and a couplr of other big bodies as well. Size wise
 they match up but UMASS is the better rebounding team.....

 mike
77.1420"it's attacking and trey's that will carry the day"AKOCOA::TROYMon Mar 13 1995 14:509
    
    Pardon me, but I are we simply ceding UMASS St. Peter's (I hope so) and
    Stanford/UNC-Charlotte?  Strikes me that the Energy and attack
    mentality of UMASS, coupled with 40% or so 3 shooting will make the
    difference. People will pack it in against UMASS and dare them to shoot
    3's. We must outrebound the opponents through attacking the glass and
    shoot trey's.  Everyone will throw zone like coverage at us.
    
    
77.1421Cal is a punkMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Mar 13 1995 15:0114
    
       Sounds like Coach Cal has caught whatever it is that had UMass
      fans whining about the unfair treatment from the Globe and has 
      decided that the only way to cure it is to cut his nose off though
      it might spite his face. This is the type of move that we might have
      expected from John Thompson but Coach Cal? He didn't burn Shaugnessy,
      if he did that he'd deserve a medal. The guy he burned was Joe Burris
      who has covered 29 of UMass' 30 games and anyone, who doesn't have
      the monstrous inferiority complex of many UMass fans, would agree that
      Burris' coverage has been more than fair. UMass may have a #2 seed
      but in too many ways they're still bush league. It's almost enough
      to make you wish that the story on the player who was suspended
      for banging a girl head off of a cement wall (funny no one mentioned
      *that* in here) made the front page.
77.1422Tournament ThoughtsSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Mar 13 1995 15:0428
      I kind of think UMass did get screwed with the seeding.  How
      it is Kansas was given a Midwest #1, I don't know!  I saw
      Kansas/UMass/Wake pretty even.  If Kansas gets a #1, it shouldn't
      be in the midwest after their loss.
    
      But, they sure look in a good situation.  No Virginia or Maryland
      in the 2nd round.  (Thank you!!)  I don't know anything about UNC-
      Charlotte though.
    
      I think they should have no problem the first two games, but that
      3rd game, if its Villanova, ought to be INTENSE.  As for a #1, I'd
      rather have to play Wake then UCLA, Kansas, Kentucky or North
      Carolina ot Arkansas for that matter.
    
      Its gonna be a challenge to the guards.  Kittles and Childress.
      To me the biggest thing will be perimeter shooting from the guards
      (surprise) and just being UP for the games.
    
      I also thought of Dingle or Bright trying to match against Kittles.
      They can both play off guard, can't they?
    
      My picks for final four are:
      UCLA/Villanova/Arkansas/North Carolina
    
      But, I hope I'm wrong!!
    
    							Tony
    
77.1423HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Mar 13 1995 15:549
  Despite how the seeding is done UMASS has as enough talent to beat anyone.
They just have to stay lucky because in a 1 game elimination format anything
can happen.

  As N.C. proved in their opening game last year against B.C. any team that
slacks off a bit or just as a run of bad luck will watch the rest of the
tourney on TV regardless of who they are playing. 

  George
77.1424MROA::RSCHOTTMon Mar 13 1995 16:0618
         I agree that it is too bad that Joe Burris was the guy most
    affected by Calipari's decision to exclude the Globe from his selection
    party.  He has performed a nice job in covering UMASS Basketball for
    several years now.  However I have absolutely no problem with Calipari
    treating the Boston Globe in that fashion.  The Globe (other than the
    Globe Ombudsman) has never fallen on its sword and admitted that printing
    names and transcripts was the wrong thing to do, even when 99% of the
    other Boston media commentators have criticized them for the tactic.
    The Globe is about to publish another article thats critical of the
    basketball program (or so I understand).  Why should Calipari bend over
    backwards to be nice to them?
    
    Russ
    
    - besides, the Globe reporter and cameramen would probably have
    assigned values to the Calipari's furniture, artwork and antiques, and 
    printed same in today's Globe, anyway ;^)!! 
                                               
77.1425MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Mar 13 1995 17:157
    
      Coach Cal didn't have to 'bend over backwards to be nice' to
     the Globe. What he did was bend over backwards to take a shot 
     at them. Burris has attended the selection party for years and
     now Cal pulls this stunt. I guess if you don't kiss Coach Cal's 
     er... um... ring, you don't get to play with his ball. He certainly
     could learn something about class from Jim O'Brien and BC.
77.1426TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Mon Mar 13 1995 17:1822
    
    
    	I'm amuzed that the Globe's lockout from Coach Cal's house
    is generating as much noise that it is. It is a major topic of
    discussion on WEEI today. We all know that Danny Boy threw a 
    hissy-fit in today's globe. Plus all the talk in here. I never
    would have known the Globe was locked out, if Danny-Boy hadn't written
    about it.
    
    	I think it was a measured retaliation against the Globe for their
    GPA story this year. They have to take it out on Burris, because the 
    slime-bucket who wrote the GPA story probably won't get close enough to
    Amherst for them to get a chance at him. Its too bad for Burris, but
    he pays for his employer. And besides, what's the big deal? Nobody
    really cares about what happened in Shutesbury last night. The only
    reason the Globe is miffed is because they weren't invited. It isn't
    like they were locked-out of some really big, important story or any
    thing....
    
    JimH
    
    
77.1427This is bigger than the Boston Globe now...EDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityMon Mar 13 1995 17:3116
    Regardless of whether it's "fair" or not, it should be understood now
    that it's not just Boston or the Boston Globe, but rather that the 
    UMass basketball program is starting to acquire a bad reputation 
    _nationally_.  I've heard negative references crop up in both SI and 
    WFAN recently (the latter being something along the lines that the 
    NCAA doesn't think much of Calapari so don't expect much from the 
    selection committee).  Now they've got The Moral Conscience of college 
    sports, Armen Keteyian (ask Nebraska Marty about this guy) tailing the 
    program.  The bottom line is that even if he's right in this petty 
    squabble with the Globe, Calapari is not doing himself any favors.  He 
    should be thinking longterm or this program could disappear as quickly 
    as it arrived.
    
    glenn
    
77.1428ONOFRE::MAY_BRpet rocks, pogs, Dallas CowboysMon Mar 13 1995 17:443
    
    Even the local sports station here took a shot a UMass' reputation.
    Word is getting around.
77.1429MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Mar 13 1995 17:5018
77.1430Calipari may not be perfect, but he's done a great job at UMassTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Mar 13 1995 18:4733
    OK Tommy, you got me to take your bait.
    
    The negative reference in SI was back in November, not recently.
    The negative reference on the FAN, which I heard, was more of a
    throwaway comment by Mike Francesa, stating that if Coach Cal was
    inviting media to his house, he should invite all the media that
    cover the team regularly, but as Francesa noted, "it's not that
    big of a deal."  Mad Dog responded by saying that it's his house, and
    he should be allowed to decide who comes in or not.  That was it.
    
    BTW, I heard Dale Arnold talking about it at lunch (before the Mike
    and the Mad Dog show).  Arnold said he believed the Globe should have
    been allowed in, but that most of his callers disagreed with him, "and
    that's what talk shows are about, people's opinions."
    
    My opinion is that you resent Coach Cal's success at UMass Tommy, for 
    some reason that I can't figure out.  His resurrection of the program 
    should be envied, he has broughtmoney and mostly positive publicity to
    a school that needs both, he has achieved national prominence for his
    basketball team, and almost every one of the kids he brought into the 
    program has graduated.  Tyrone Weeks, a Prop 48 kid he brought in two
    years ago, achieved a 3.5 GPA this fall.  The team GPA was 2.8, not too
    shabby.  The man is making a lot of money off the program, but most of
    it is strictly tied to UMass' success.  His base salary is among the
    lowest of all prominent Division 1 basketball coaches.  He has restored
    some pride in the state university.  He donated $20,000 to the school
    library.  He regularly funds outings to UMass games for groups such as
    the Lawrence Boys and Girls Clubs.
    
    What's not to like?
    
    NAZZ
    
77.1431Now this I hope I'm wrong onAKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintMon Mar 13 1995 18:477
    I hope for the sake of a few around here that this wasn't Coach Cal's
    swan song token to remember me by - to wit, he's gone after this
    tourney.  If it's bad advice to burn a bridge AFTER you've crossed it
    it's worse to burn it while still on it.
    
    Cal may feel he has no use for Boston and it's Globe so take the
    parting shot while it's there.
77.1432CAMONE::WAYUSS Triton, SS-201, On Eternal PatrolMon Mar 13 1995 18:511
Do you guys pick up the FAN up there in Mass?
77.1433WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MShe's the MAN!!!!Mon Mar 13 1995 18:523
    
    
       I do.
77.1434Most days the FAN comes in pretty wellTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Mar 13 1995 18:596
    Clear as a bell on Rt. 495.  I had to go to Nashuaa at lunch today, and
    the station came in perfectly.  Got to hear some of Russ Salzberg (sp?)
    before 1 (mixed in with Dale Arnold on WEEI) and Mike and the Mad Dog
    after 1:00.
    
    NAZZ
77.1435AKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintMon Mar 13 1995 19:192
    What's the number (am I assume) for the Fan?  It would beat Andleman
    whom I've soured on because he deserted Reggie.
77.1436MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Mon Mar 13 1995 19:294
    WFAN is 660 on your AM dial.  I can pass on Russ, but Mike and the
    Mad Dog is on every commute home.
    
    Mike
77.1437MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Mar 13 1995 19:5216
    
 >> My opinion is that you resent Coach Cal's success at UMass Tommy, for 
 >> some reason that I can't figure out.  

    I don't resent his success at all. I resent the fact that several of
    his players had major academic problems while taking creampuff courses
    and the best he can do is tell us he's "proud". I resent the fact that
    he pulled this bush league stunt on Joe Burris who did nothing to de-
    serve it. Resent his success? As a lifelong resident of central Mass.
    I am nothing but happy that UMass is as successful as they are. That
    doesn't preclude me from thinking Coach Cal is a lowlife who'll skip
    town if someone waves enough dough in front of his face. He's another
    Pitino - style over substance greedheads. And for what it's worth, I
    don't think either of them is good enough to take a team to the Promised
    Land.
    
77.1438We're reaching some common ground, TommyTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Mar 13 1995 20:0117
    Calipari had a 5 year, 3 million contract waved at him from Pitt lasted
    season, but he stayed put.  He also has had overtures from at least one
    other Big (L)east team, as well the Big Ten.  So far, he's stayed the
    course at UMass.  But he's still very young, and I expect if the schnoz
    ever leaves Carolina, Williams will go there and Coach Cal will go back
    to Kansas.
    
    I agree 100% regarding Joe Burris, who is a class guy and has treated
    UMass fairly all the way.  He got caught in the middle of this power
    play, but Joe's a big boy and I'm sure he understands that he was not
    being singled out.
    
    As for the academics, I have no idea what courses the UMass basketball
    players took last semester, and neither do you.  You have no basis to
    call them creampuffs.
    
    NAZZ
77.1439MROA::RSCHOTTTue Mar 14 1995 12:1545
         Well, if anyone is still wondering why the Boston Globe was denied
    access to John Calipari's home in Shutesbury the other evening, the
    answer is made brutally obvious on the front page of today's Globe.
    In an article that is largely a reprint of last October's revelations
    on the Basketball Team's Grade Point Averages, the paper has once again
    taken aim at Calipari's reputation for integrity.  What I can't
    understand is how this particular article "fits" in a series of
    articles that are supposed to review "the state of the union" at the
    University of Massachusetts.  Could the Globe have "invented" the four
    part series it's now running, only as an excuse to get at Calipari one
    more time ..... I wonder?
    
         Today's article makes new allegations.  Dan Golden claims that
    certain UMASS Basketball Players were not recruited by certain other
    schools based on their high school transcripts and SAT scores.  Sure Dan, 
    I'll give you that MIT, the University of Chicago, and Cal-Poly were
    not recruiting Donta Bright.  However, Marcus Camby and Lou Roe went
    on record after last fall's article, that the Globe was absolutely,
    unequivocally mistaken, in saying that school's such as UCONN, Syracuse
    and Providence, had taken scholarship offers off the table based on
    their academic records.  Both stated that once they scored the
    requisite SAT's, that each of the above schools would have admitted
    them.  
    
         The other new information brought out this morning, is or was
    Calipari's relationship to Wayne Simone, a Connecticut AAU Coach.  Well
    perhaps the Globe should think about St.John's relationship with the
    Riverside Church Hawks, or Syracuse's ties to the New York Gaucho's,
    or locally, BC's pipeline through Jack McMahon and Leo Papile, and the
    Boston (AAU) Shootout Team.  If I'm not mistaken, at one time or another,
    the Curley brothers, Chris Herren, Duane Woodward, Bevan Thomas, and
    Keenan Jourdan all played for the Boston AAU team.  What is the quid
    pro quo in that situation?
    
         And finally, I have to question the timing of this article.  Was
    it coincidence that last fall's article hit the streets just after the
    Basketball Team was named a top 5 team in the preseason polls, and
    almost the same day, as the team's Media Day?  And is it coincidence
    that this Article hits the week before the NCAA tournament.  I think
    not.
    
    Russ 
    
    - Oliver Stone was right all along!
                   
77.1440Attempt at a smear against UMass basketball fails badlyTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Tue Mar 14 1995 12:4047
    Not only that, the article questions UMass taking on academically
    questionable athletes and proclaims in the headlines that their
    enrolling them places the schools academic standing in jeopardy. 
    Yet the article itself refutes its own premise.  The success of Inus
    Norville is a perfect example of what a state university is supposed to
    do, take kids with promise who need help to achieve, provide that help,
    and watch them succeed.
    
    UMass has taken three Prop 48 kids in Calipari's tenure.  The article
    decries taking Prop 48s and piously states how the ACC and some other
    schools don't allow it, then mentions how successful the first Prop 48
    student has been.  Kennard Robinson graduated and is now playing pro
    ball in INdonesia.  Robinson was a marginal player who saw little
    playing time at UMass - that's not mentioned.  Neither was the fact
    that he was an honors student who not only got his undergrad degree,
    but also his masters.  Also not mentioned in the story was that the
    other two Prop 48 kids are doing well academically.  Donta Bright is on
    time to gradute with his class, and Tyrone Weeks had a 3.5 gpa last
    semester, factors that seemed to escape the article.
    
    Almost all the negative stuff in the article came from Wayne Simone, an
    AAU coach and former basketball magazine publisher.  I worked for
    Simone on Off the Glass, covering college basketball in New England in
    general and the NOrth Atlantic conference in particlar.  This guy got a
    present of $250,000 from his grandfather when he graduated college in
    1986, and started his magazine a year later.  A friend of mine was his
    first recruit as a writer, and got me to leave Eastern Basterball for
    Off the Glass to work for Wayne.  Unfortunately, Wayne had no clue how
    to run a business, and was bankrupt before he turned 25.  The magazine
    never made it to a third year, and several of the freelance writers
    never got paid for second year with the magazine.  But it was fun,
    talking to the athletes, getting into games for free, getting to know
    the coaches, so the pay was a minor aspect of the thing.  But Wayne
    landed on his feet.  He moved back home, lived with his parents, and
    through his connections from Off the Glass, got involved with the AAU
    program in Connecticut.  He only worked part time, but still lived the
    good life thanks to mom and dad.  His two partners sued him, but got
    nothing, since Wayne had nothing left and was living off his folks.
    One of his two partners ended up working as a travel agent - he was the
    managing editor.  The other guy started the Jersey City NJ Hall of
    Fame, made no money from that, and I lost track of him a few years ago.
    My point is that Simone is a guy who has had stuff handed to him all
    his life, and may resent it when people stop supporting him in the
    style to which he is accustomed.  Hence, an axe to grind against
    Calipari, and a perfect source for Golden.
    
    NAZZ
77.1441MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 14 1995 14:1316
   >> The success of Inus Norville is a perfect example of...

      Just where the academic standards of UMass vis a vis the 
      basketball team are. Here's a kid who scored a 490 (that's
      not a typo) on his SATs and yet is pulling down a 3.0 at
      UMass. Not something that I'd be trumpeting. I'd love to
      his course load as well as Tyrone Weeks'. And don't UMass 
      players seem to undergo the most amazing scholastic meta-
      morphosis once the season begins? These players who were
      publicly (and yes, unfairly) humiliated when their pathetic
      grades were published have suddenly been transformed into
      Fulbright scholars. The cynical amongst us might attribute
      it to wimpy course work and favortism but I'm sure it's all
      due to hard work and the stern guidance of John Calipari, 
      educator.
    
77.1442They needed someone else to shoveCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Tue Mar 14 1995 14:135
    The Globe was tough on UMASS but did you catch how they were all over
    the Athol school systems. They made them sound like one of rowdiest
    schools ever. Isn't this Chappy's school system? 
    
    Mike
77.1443WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MShe's the MAN!!!!Tue Mar 14 1995 14:378
    
    
    
    
    
        I missed it. What happened. Was it in this weeks?
    
    Chap
77.1444MKFSA::LONGLet your tongue hang out. Stay cool.Tue Mar 14 1995 14:3816
    >>Here's a kid who scored a 490 (that's not a typo) on his SATs 
    >>and yet is pulling down a 3.0 at UMass.
    
    I know some folks just don't do well on tests, but that is really
    ridiculous.  No way, no how, does someone who can only master a
    490 (makes me feel like a genius) in the SAT get Bs in 'normal'
    freshman work.
    
    One can only shake their head a university system that allows,
    no make that recruits, 'students' who score that poorly on SATs
    while turning down better students who couldn't hit a trey if 
    their life depended on it.  But that's a whole new can of worms.
    
    
    
    billl
77.1445CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Tue Mar 14 1995 15:408
    It's in todays Metro|Region section, page 17. Seems that an eigth grade
    teacher 2 weeks after he was hired quit because of "the class from
    hell". One kid would shooting paper airplanes and kicking his desk at
    the teacher. Another kid kept calling out obsenities at the teacher, 3
    boys entered his class to talk to their freind and refused to leave.
    Rowdyism was so bad at the school that passed a petition around
    demanding a crackdown on troublemakers. School officials deny it but
    from reading it sounds like a Globe exageration
77.1446"DIGITAL or UMASS #1 Globe whipping boy?"AKOCOA::TROYTue Mar 14 1995 16:0922
    
    Great background on the AAU guy, Nazz.
    
    For whatever set of factors, it sure seems Cal has rubbed a lot of
    people the wrong way - both in MAss, but also with the national press
    and his peers at other schools.  An excellent point was made earlier
    that most of his compensation is performance based - and not from state
    coffers. In a state that pays Univ employees at best par with other
    state U's, the attendance and summer camp mechanisms are the only way
    to go.  And, he is just plain a go getter.  Isn't his fundamental crime
    not being a local in bred guy, who works in front of, not behind, the scenes?
    
    For academics, any of you UMIEs out there know you get out of UMASS
    what you put into it;  you can always move to the 100 level courses. 
    The question is: by their jr. year are they really "in" a major, not
    Arts and Sciences, and taking upper level courses.  BTW, you can do the
    same thing at other schools, including Ivies, based on my experience.
    There's always an underground railroad of gut courses. 
    
    The question in my mind is: while DIGITAL used to be the Globe's #1
    whipping boy, is it now UMASS?  And as the Beatles once asked "What
    have we done to deserve such a fate?"
77.1447Sports???STRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Tue Mar 14 1995 16:219
      I have some interest in this, but I was hoping to read about
      potential matchups with say Villanova (if they get that far).
    
      I'm from a school that believes, "Judge not lest you be judged."
    
      I don't know Calipari the man.  I don't know his heart.  But,
      apparently others here are psychics.  
    
      I won't comment since I'm not.  I lack any 'inside' information.
77.1448Is that all there is?EDWIN::WAUGAMANBaseball owners, den of inequityTue Mar 14 1995 16:2928
                                    
    I dunno, if Chap's kid is in that Athol 8th-grade science class that 
    has already chewed its way through 3 teachers working on a 4th we may 
    have a major story here... ;-)
    
    I didn't read today's Globe story as a scandalous expose.  As the title
    ("Basketball glory may have academic cost") suggests, it's more of a 
    "is it worth it?" type piece that examines both the pros and cons.  It's 
    not great publicity for UMass, to be sure, but many points were favorable.  
    The relative successes of those Prop-48 kids that Nazz pointed out were 
    also specifically cited in the article, not covered up (the Norville
    case where the kid overcame a learning disability where he _did_ at the
    very least reach the 700 score is actually fairly compelling, as
    related here).  The average SAT scores of the admitted players are 
    listed as only marginally lower than the national average for public 
    schools.  And the article also explicitly mentions that there is no 
    indication of any rules violations, that the matter is purely one of
    standards and priorities.
    
    I can read this same article and come away the conclusion that there is
    not a dissimilar problem with UMass' basketball program and that the 
    decisions that have been made are on the whole justifiable.  It seems 
    that the only problem here is that a publication like the Globe would 
    lay out some very concrete facts about the state's university and ask
    the reader to decide for himself.
    
    glenn
       
77.1449But my 1 year old is quite the hellion!!!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MShe's the MAN!!!!Tue Mar 14 1995 16:3310
    
    
    
       Nope my oldest(girl)is in 7th. Straight B student. I hear the Middle
    school was having problems. 
    
    Chap
    
    
    
77.1450I'm the dad of an ADD child BTW....TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Tue Mar 14 1995 16:5159
    
      I just read today's Globe article. I don't see anything
    surprising in there. Everybody already knew UMass accepted
    Prop 48 students. Everybody already knew that NCXAA basketball
    is big-business, and many schools take on marginal students
    in pursuit of the almighty TV $'s. UMass is hardly alone in
    this regard. Calipari is no siant, but he also doesn't horns
    on his head either...
    
    	Another think I'm not surprised at is Tommy quoting parts
    of the article, but not posting quite ALL of the pertinent info...
    
      >Just where the academic standards of UMass vis a vis the 
      >basketball team are. Here's a kid who scored a 490 (that's
      >not a typo) on his SATs and yet is pulling down a 3.0 at
      >UMass.
    
    	What Tommy conviently leaves out in this part is that 
    Norville could barely read until his junior year in High School,
    at which point he was diagnosed with a learning disability (LD). He
    did score only 490 (and later a 480) on his SAT's. He was then 
    allowed to take the SAT's untimed, to accomodate his LD, at which point
    he scored over 700. (Its not mentioned in the Globe, but I'm willing to
    wager Norville has Attention Deficit Disorder. Allowing ADD students
    to take un-timed tests is common.)
    
    	Basically this kid was failed by his school system for 11 years.
    You don't make up that much lost time over-night. But I wouldn't be
    surprised to see marked improvement, especially if he is recieving
    a lot of one-on-one tutoring as part of the UMass program. 
    
    	Who knows how Norville's story will turn out. But if he succeeds
    in getting a college education as a result of Prop 48, then it is
    well worth it.
    
      > ...And don't UMass 
      >players seem to undergo the most amazing scholastic meta-
      >morphosis once the season begins?
    
    	Agaion, not telling the whole story from the article. The low
    grades reported last fall, where from after the previous spring
    semester. The Globe just didn't bother publishing them until the
    start of BBall season (Gee, I wonder why they waited???? ;-) 
    The improved grades are from the 94 fall semester. And you
    neglect to mention that the UMass President is quoted in the article
    as saying he is interested in seeing the players marks for this
    spring's semester, because of the NCAA Tournement taking up so
    much time and energy. Clearly the the UMass administration is
    not ignoring what's going on.
    
    	However, I suspect no matter what happens with the UMass
    Bball program, they've already lost in your eyes. If the players
    grades plummet again this spring, you'll say "I told you so". And
    if they show improvement, you'll make more "gut" course insinuations.
    
    	Just the nature of the "cynical" beast, I guess.. :-)
    
    JimH
    
77.1451Headline and writer bias clouded real issuesTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Tue Mar 14 1995 16:5519
    I agree with what you are saying Glenn, but the way the Globe headlined
    the story "Basketball Glory May have Academic Cost" casts a negative
    connotation on the Norville and Weeks stories.  These are not negatives
    but positives, exactly the kind of thing that a state university should
    be doing.  There is no academic cost, and the direct implication from
    the headline and the position of the writer of the story is that UMass
    is doing something unethical, improper, or even illegal, when none of
    that is true.
    
    Now, for those of you like Tommy who selectively read the article,
    Inus Norville was NOT admitted with a 490 SAT.  He was identified as
    having a learning disability, was allowed to retake the SAT with no
    time limit, and scored well above the 700 needed to attend UMass and
    participate as a freshman.  UMass has set up an academic program for
    him that will give him a chance to succeed in school and later in life. 
    IMO, this is exactly what a public school of higher education should
    and must be doing.
    
    NAZZ
77.1452Hoya Paranoia strikes AmherstMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 14 1995 17:2118
        I'm really a little surprised that the folks who should 
       most be a little perturbed at the devaluing of their degrees, 
       alums of Mass. state public colleges, are leaping to defend
       this minor tragedy. And Jim, I didn't 'conveniently' leave 
       out anything. I said Norville scored a 490 on his SATs and
       he did. I certainly hope that he could score a 700 when al-
       lowed to take them untimed. I don't care if the kid sees things
       through a kaleidescope, I have a hard time buying a transform-
       ation from a 490 SAT score to a solid B student carrying a 
       'normal' course load. These days I think 'LD' (i love these 
       ridiculous acronyms) is just a euphemism for 'not very smart'. 
       And really, I think if anything Nazz should pen a thank you 
       note to the Globe for the original article because without it 
       nothingwould have been done and these kids would probably still 
       be pulling Ds in Sports Theory.
    
       
77.1453MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 14 1995 17:3313
        <<< Note 77.1452 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>        I'm really a little surprised that the folks who should 
>       most be a little perturbed at the devaluing of their degrees, 
>       alums of Mass. state public colleges, are leaping to defend
>       this minor tragedy. 

	The devaluing of degrees from almost every institution in the
	country has nothing to do with any degrees given to athletes;
	rather, most institutions have rampant grade inflation that
	has caused businesses to look at degrees as a minor consideration
	in hiring.  The tragedy is that colleges do very little these days
	at the undergraduate level to prepare anyone for a career.
77.1454SNAX::ERICKSONGlobe 2, Calipari 1Tue Mar 14 1995 17:4414
    
    Tommy,
    
    	What you "conveniently" left out was that Norville has a learning
    disability. This learning disability is what caused him to score a 
    490, and then a 480 on his SATs.
    	As Nazz stated his school district ignored him for 11 years. I've
    seen this type of thing happen with my own sister. She just couldn't
    learn, yet the school system wouldn't give her some kind of special
    test. So her Freshman year of High School she finally got the test.
    She has some learning disability that she can't comprehend what she
    reads. In some sort of matter, I can't remember what. Anyways they
    had a tutor work with her reading and comprehension. Her grades went
    from C's and D's to all B's in one school year.
77.1455TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Tue Mar 14 1995 17:4418
    
    
       >this minor tragedy. And Jim, I didn't 'conveniently' leave 
       >out anything. I said Norville scored a 490 on his SATs and
       >he did.
    
    		Whatever you want to beleive. It is interesting that two
    other people also felt the need to point out your omissions. 
    
    		Your comments about Learning Disabilities just displays
    your ignorance on the subject. 
    
    		One point I will agree with you, is the subject of
    exposure. Yes, in the long run, it is beneficial to UMass (and higher
    ed in general). Public focus on these issues is good.
    
    JimH
    
77.1456PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingTue Mar 14 1995 17:4511
                     <<< Note 77.1453 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

>	in hiring.  The tragedy is that colleges do very little these days
>	at the undergraduate level to prepare anyone for a career.

    Maybe this is the case for your alma mater, but I consider my
    undergraduate degree exceptional in providing preparation for my
    career.
    
    Mark.
    
77.1457MROA::RSCHOTTTue Mar 14 1995 17:487
         My question is, how many times does Lou Roe (who by every account
    I've ever read is a good kid, a consummate team player, and someone who
    with the exception of last spring has had decent college grades) have
    to read in the Boston Globe that he is "dummy"?
    
    Russ 
    
77.1458HOTLNE::BRIANTue Mar 14 1995 18:0415
    This is not a question of trying to show players as being dumb.  The
    articles were written to show the special treatment given to atheletes
    regarding grades and eligibility.  
    
    In many schools there are grade levels that must be obtained in order
    to continue recieving scholarships or to stay at that particular
    school.  There is no reason why these grades should not be required
    regarding whether your an athelete or not.  
    
    The only reason that this topic has been printed recently is because of
    past problems regarding college athletics and that Umass is in the
    national spotlight.
    
    Brian
    
77.1459USCTR1::GARBARINORed Sox &gt; Syracuse HoopstersTue Mar 14 1995 18:098
>    IMO, this is exactly what a public school of higher education should
>    and must be doing.          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Isn't it possible that this is a big reason for the publicity ?  Not just
because someone is jealous of their success ?  Afterall, the taxpayers of
Massachusetts have an interest here, and the media does play a role it
reporting on matters of interest to the general public.
77.1460MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 14 1995 18:128
    
    >> It is interesting that two other people also felt the need to 
    >> point out your omissions. 
    
       What you 'conveniently' left out was that one (and probably both)
       is a UMass grad. Not exactly impartial observations.
    
    
77.1461I didn't reach this conclusion either...EDWIN::WAUGAMANNLRB, men of judicial integrityTue Mar 14 1995 18:1424
>    My question is, how many times does Lou Roe (who by every account
>    I've ever read is a good kid, a consummate team player, and someone who
>    with the exception of last spring has had decent college grades) have
>    to read in the Boston Globe that he is "dummy"?
    
    Again, that's your extrapolation.  Not mentioned from the article is 
    that Roe is expected to graduate and is considered to be a "success 
    story" by the basketball program.  The issue is the academic standard 
    for athletic admissions (Roe was hardly singled out as a failure of
    this system).  I think it is a legitimate issue.  Fortunately or 
    unfortunately the admission standings and continuing academic status 
    of the athletes (if not the actual grades, as we found previously with 
    the Globe's unscrupulous handling of confidential information) is 
    public knowledge.  The interest of the supporters of the program
    themselves makes that a reality, the knowledge of who can and will be 
    admitted and later allowed to play.  I don't have a problem with that
    but it seems hypocritical that such information is critical when
    analyzing eligibility during recruiting season and such, but is to be 
    considered strictly private when any serious questions over academics 
    arise.

    glenn
    
77.1462TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Tue Mar 14 1995 18:2021
    
    
       >What you 'conveniently' left out was that one (and probably both)
       >is a UMass grad. Not exactly impartial observations.
    
    	Completely irrelevant, because everybody simply pointed out the
    parts of the article you left out.
    
    	The Globe at least published both pros and cons of the Norville
    situation. In you rush to label Calipari as an evil bad guy, you only
    point out the "bad". 
    
    	At least the Globe maintains some semblence of open-mindness in
    this article. Maybe you should follow their example....
    
    JimH
    
    
    	
    
    
77.1463The premise has no teethTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Tue Mar 14 1995 19:3017
    Glenn, if the issue was academic standards for athletic admissions,
    that would be fine.  If the issue was taxpayers dollars subsidizing the
    basketball program, that would be fine.  But the Globe's premise,
    contained in the headline "Basketball Glory at Academic Cost" is
    misleading at best and dishonest at worst.  It casts a negative light
    on all the athletes in the program, and on Calipari himself.  From the
    text of the article, it seems the Globe has little ammunition to back up
    their premise, instead relying on the use of Prop 48 students (legal,
    only 3 out of all the recruits Calipari has had in 7 years, and all
    succeeding academically) and the teams average on SAT admissions.
    Yes, due to the three Prop 48 kids, their average is lower than most
    of the areas schools.  But the kids are doing the work and graduating.
    Taxpayers money is being used wisely, and kids are getting an
    education.
    
    NAZZ
    
77.1464MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 14 1995 19:4219
   >> At least the Globe maintains some semblence of open-mindness in
   >> this article. Maybe you should follow their example....
    
      Let's not have a new and improved version of the 'figure skating
      is/isn't a sport' debate. Believe what you will, I do not agree
      with you. I think the evidence is quite clear that UMass recruits 
      kids with poor academics and that several of those kids were still
      performing poorly in college. And I find it very hard to be-
      lieve that a kid who can barely read can in three years trans-
      form himself into a B student carrying a normal college course 
      load and playing varsity basketball with all the travel and 
      practice that entails. I think most of us had a hard enough
      time trying to pull Bs without those added disadvantages. I 
      wish Inus Norville nothing but the best, I just hope he isn't
      being disserved yet again. 
    	
    
    
    
77.1465Hopeful for NorvilleSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Tue Mar 14 1995 20:047
      Maybe I'm out in left field, but I'm open to the possibility
      that there is something to 'LD' and I'm even open to the
      reply from the person who's sister went from C's and D's to
      B's in one year.
    
      Geeez Tommy, why don't you at least be open to more favorable
      possibilities...at least in the single case of Inus Norville?
77.1466rather have lower academic standards than crimeCNTROL::CHILDSEnd Corporate Welfare Instead!Tue Mar 14 1995 20:1213
>      Geeez Tommy, why don't you at least be open to more favorable
>      possibilities...at least in the single case of Inus Norville?

 Cause he cherishes that award that he feels ICEMAN stole from him????

 ;^)

 While a good education is a nice thing to have the real movers and shakers
 are generally the best ass kisser around who have phd's in BS and not 
 4.0 GPA's. Besides if UMASS didn't accept these kids one of the alternatives 
 is that they'd be on the streets scam their way through life.......

 mike
77.1467WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Mar 15 1995 00:0317
    
>      Geeez Tommy, why don't you at least be open to more favorable
>      possibilities...at least in the single case of Inus Norville?
    
    Let's assume you're right (I agree with Thomas, though).
    
    Would Joe Student get all the same "help" bringing his 490 SAT (that's
    disgusting) up to "B" grades.  Would your or my 490 get special 
    consideration for us having a reading comprehension problem?  If not, 
    why not?
    
    By the way, having "taught" (in quotes 'cause I couldn't teach people
    who weren't there) basketball and football players at S.U., I'm
    certainly not saying UMass is alone in their devaluing of degrees.
    
    - Sean
    
77.1468College sports = businessCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Wed Mar 15 1995 11:419
    What's the big deal. These players have added a few million dollars to
    the Massachusetts University excelling in a game that brings millions
    of dollars to schools. The colleges use the kids to bring in millions.
    The kids use the schools to get a free education even though some
    wouldn't get in. It's the same for football. UMASS isn't alone in this
    and please noone can say that BC, BU or any of the other schools
    haven't, won't do the same as UMASS.
    
    Mike
77.1469TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Wed Mar 15 1995 12:4548
    
      >Let's not have a new and improved version of the 'figure skating
      >is/isn't a sport' debate. 
    
    	Again, completely irrelevant stuff we've been discussing. Why bring
    it up, other than to atteck me personally and deflecty attention from
    the UMass academic issues. What do they call that? An Ad Hominem
    attack??
    
    	I don't think anybody hjas tried to denied that UMass has recruited
    academically marginal students. By definition Prop 48 students are
    marginal. The Globe (and you) are implying that UMass has done
    something "wrong" in the process, which is what many of us are
    disputing. You've tried to advance you position by posting only
    the parts of the story that fits you need (i.e. Norville and his
    490 SAT), leaving out details hich provided a complete picture
    of the situation (Learning Disabilities and subsequent higher scores).
    
      > ...And I find it very hard to be-
      >lieve that a kid who can barely read can in three years trans-
      >form himself into a B student carrying a normal college course 
      >load...
    
    	I would find that hard to believe too. I doubt Norville is
    working on a "normal" course load. He's probably taking all low
    level, remedial type courses. He's probably spends much of his
    time 1-on-1 with tutors provided by the Athletic Dept. He's
    probabnly learning stuff now that he should have learned in high
    school. People with learning disabilities are not "just stupid".
    When the learning disability is diagnosed and 'treated' students
    can show remarkable improvement and rapid progress. I don't believe
    that he has gone from barely reading to a typical 'B' college
    student in 2+ years. Do I think he deserves a chance to succeed?
    Yes. Would he get that chance without a Prop 48 situation? I doubt it.
    The sad part is, if he wasn't a talented Bball player he'ld be out in
    the street right now.
    
    	Basically Tommy, I realize we disagree. I do tend to look at
    a situation and see positives aspects, where you see only negatives.
    And I'm not blind to the fact that Calipari and the UMass basketball
    program are exploiting these kids for their basketball talents (And
    not just the marginal students. And not just UMass, all colleges
    are..). But I can see somebody like Norville reaping great benefits
    from it. 
    
    JimH
    
    
77.1470I'm not suprised the Globe has selective reportingMKFSA::LONGLet your tongue hang out. Stay cool.Wed Mar 15 1995 13:0919
    My take on this is that some are taking exception with the fact
    that UMASS, not unlike most every Division I schools, marginal,
    and in some cases not even close to marginal, students and 
    "giving" them a chance to get a degree.  Meanwhile folks like
    myself, who have the vertical leap of a pregnant elephant and
    would have trouble hitting 60% from the floor with a 10' ladder, 
    were turned down admission to places of "higher leaning" simply
    because I couldn't post the required SAT score.  Do I take this
    personal?  You bet your bippy!
    
    I'm not convinced yet of who is the exploiter and who is the 
    exploitee.  I guess it depends on your perspective.
    
    When did they pass the constitutional amendment to guarantee
    "everyone" a college education, regardless of your mental
    capacities?
    
    
    billl
77.1471MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 15 1995 14:4328
    
   >> Again, completely irrelevant stuff we've been discussing. Why bring
   >> it up, other than to atteck me personally and deflecty attention from
   >> the UMass academic issues. What do they call that? An Ad Hominem
   >> attack??
    
      If I wanted to 'atteck' you personally I would have pointed out
      the many misspellings and grammatical errors in your posts defend-
      ing UMass' academic record.  My point was simply that this is turn-
      ing to another argument without end but you seem to enjoy that type
      of thing.


  >> He's probabnly learning stuff now that he should have learned 
  >> in high school. 

     Last I checked UMass was not a high school. I'd like to think
     that a degree from UMass isn't the equivalent of a high school
     diploma but under Coach Cal, it probably is.
    

   >> Basically Tommy, I realize we disagree. I do tend to look at
   >> a situation and see positives aspects, where you see only negatives.

      You've got a lot of room to be crying about personal 'attecks'.
    
    
    
77.1472Meanwhile back on the campusAKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintWed Mar 15 1995 14:5013
    I saw where attempts are being made to unionize college athletes
    especially those in programs generating a lot of money and again
    especially where a lot of that money comes from merchandise sporting
    the stars name or number.
    
    Apparently the current deal is that everyone will keep quiet because
    the excess revenues go to support programs that can't fund themselves.
    Problem is the honest athletes are essentially working for nothing
    although if honest are at least getting an expensive education.
    
    Ultimate irony is the star who care nothing about the education (or
    cares and isn't getting it for some reason (SAT etc) saying "give me
    the money".
77.1473PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Mar 15 1995 14:511
    Rat on, Tommy!
77.1474TOOK::HALPINJim Halpin LKG1-3/L6 226-5740Wed Mar 15 1995 15:4113
    
    
    	I applegoligize fur my tyrrible typing of late.
    
     I'll try my best to double check everything before hitting that ^Z
    from now on...
    
    	And I'll drop my debate with you about UMass, since you seem to
    get annoyed by it. I think we've both made our stances clear....
    
        JimH
    
    
77.1475CSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Wed Mar 15 1995 16:0515
    Billl,
    Why take it personally? College and college sports is a big business and 
    if you can bring money back to the school thru the athletic dept. or
    any other department you could get in without any problems. Do you
    really think colleges are anything other then a business where the so
    called "elite" can make money. 
    The reason that colleges will take these athletes is because if they
    are good enough they will bring in millions. Now by investing dollars
    in them with tutors, advisers and test takers they can keep these
    assets for 4 years and continue to make money for them, and they can 
    then can graduate. Now everyone knows a few people who you are amazed
    that they have a degree so if these athletes have a degree so be it.
    
    Mike
    
77.1476MKFSA::LONGLet your tongue hang out. Stay cool.Wed Mar 15 1995 18:5712
    re: -1
    
    Mike, I couldn't agree with you more.  I guess the most recent 
    think that has brought this to the public eye is the Globe article
    which some in the tavern have taken exception to.  It would appear
    that everyone knows it goes on, but most take exception to it when
    reminded.
    I even understood this as a 17 year old (God knows how many years ago),
    but that didn't make it any easier to swallow.
    
    
    billl
77.1477... GO UMASS!!!HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Mar 16 1995 12:1211
  Does it matter what the Boston Globe says about UMASS?

  The Springfield Union seems pretty positive on UMASS and the local papers
are pretty positive. They have 20,000 students to draw from and being a
nationally ranked team they are going to get big crowds regardless of what
the Globe says.

  So what if the Globe wants to nit pick over the student's grades, who gives
a good rip what that one paper has to say?

  George
77.1478WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Mar 16 1995 20:444
    
    Home game in Worcester 2 years ago.  Home game again this year.  I
    mean, practically speaking....
    
77.1479DominatingSTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Mar 20 1995 14:1418
      Well, I saw the entire UMass game yesterday and I don't know
      that anyone would have bettered that performance.  In fact,
      after the game, the announcers said it was probably the most
      dominant performance to date.
    
      What domination!  The blocked shots.  The in your face defense.
      The outside shooting (in the 1st half).  The power inside game.
      For a while there, Stanford literally couldn't do anything.
    
      If the guards can go 40% or 35-40% from 3 and 40+ from perimeter
      inside the three, this team will be VERY hard to beat.  
    
      For me, the best performances (in terms of relative to how they 
      usually play) go to Travieso and Bright.  I REALLY like Bright's
      game.  Just watch this guy blossom next year as he becomes one of
      if not the (i.e. what does Camby do?) go to guy.
    
    						Tony
77.1480Defense on the guards was a big keyTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Mar 20 1995 14:199
    Spectacular defensive performance by the Minutemen yesterday,
    especially by Carmelo Travieso and Derek Kellogg on Dion Cross and
    Brevan Knight.  They forced them to drive the middle (not a smart thing
    to do with Camby waiting for you), pressured them all over the court,
    and basically took Stanford out of any offensive flow at all.
    
    If Padilla ever wakes up, UMass has a legitimate chance to win it all.
    
    NAZZ
77.1481CambySTRATA::BARBIERIGod cares.Mon Mar 20 1995 14:2821
      One other thing.  Camby.  Most people, when they see a dunk, think
      "What a slam!"  But, with Camby, its "How did he cover that much
      court?!!"
    
      It seemed like he took that ball all the way from the right wing
      by the out of bounds line and within 1.5 seconds, "WHAM!"  I have
      never seen a man his height run the court like he does.  Never.
      Does anyone even come close?
    
      Plus he seems pretty clutch.  To me, one of the only pluses in the
      St Peter's game was Camby making those turnarounds.  I mean they
      needed those shots and they weren't gimme's.  He was putting them 
      up from 8-15 feet and nailing them.  If he's got jitters and is 
      missing those shots...who knows what would have happened?
    
      I sure hope he stays and I think he could certainly use another 
      10-15 lbs as well as a little more experience on the offensive end,
      but this guy is obviously a lottery lock right now.
    
    						Tony
                                                               
77.1482Camby must play well for UMass to get to SeattleTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Mar 20 1995 14:547
    In the first half of the St. Peter's game, Camby was simply awful, both
    defensively and on the boards.  But halfway through the second half he
    got the wake-up call, and his one snuff of a Layup that lead to a fast
    break slam turned the entire game around.  When he comes to play, he
    can control the entire flow of a game.
    
    NAZZ
77.1483MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Mon Mar 20 1995 14:579
    
      Yup, when UMass is clicking like that and can get 25 points from
      their guards, they're virtually impossible to beat. Besides Camby,
      Roe and Bright - Tyrone Weeks and Carmelo Traveiso were huge. Weeks
      is a *man* off the boards and Traveiso had that sweet touch going 
      early that signalled a very long day fr Stanford. As for Kellogg 
      and Padilla - Derrick spent most of the game getting blown off by 
      Knight while Edgar still goes from the sublime to the ridiculous 
      from play to play. Overall a very impressive win though.
77.1484another big manBSS::MENDEZMon Mar 20 1995 15:053
    I have never really seen Camby play but a big man to watch for the
    future could be Antonio McDyess from Alabama...
    
77.1485BIGQ::MCKAYMon Mar 20 1995 17:5910
    While I thought UMASS played a good game, I also couldn't get
    over the Stanford is just plain terrible thought.  How did they ever 
    beat UNC-Charlotte?
    
    When it got to 25 points and Georgetown was in a dogfight(NPI) CBS 
    should have switched.  
    
    Anyone get the times of the games yet?
    
    Jimbo
77.1486MROA::RSCHOTTMon Mar 20 1995 18:402
         This shouldn't be a revelation, but terrific defense can
    make a good team look "just plain terrible".
77.1487Late nights for New EnglandHOTLNE::BRIANTue Mar 21 1995 11:1112
     THURSDAY:          7:45       N. Carolina  vs  Georgetown
    
                       10:35       UCONN  vs  Maryland
    
    
    
     FRIDAY:            8:00       Arkansas  vs  Memphis
    
                       10:10       UMASS  vs  Tulsa
    
    
    
77.1488I wish ESON had the final 16 nightsCSLALL::BRULEWas there life before ESPN?Tue Mar 21 1995 11:185
    In terms of exciting and emotional games I'll take this weekend's games
    over the final four every time. There is going to be some great
    basketball this weekend.
    
    Mike 
77.1489MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Fri Mar 24 1995 15:519
    
      UMass fans who revel in the neglected child image that they've
     imagined for themselves had best not read Dan Shaugnessy's column
     today. Dan, who was wrongly accused in here of whining about not
     being invited to coach Cal's house, has a very nice piece about
     UMass being theonly sports hope in what has traditionally been
     a strictly pro sports town. The only question is, how did his piece
     and the other nice piece on Donta Bright get into the "anti-UMass"
     Globe? I guess someone was asleep at the switch.
77.1490Joe Burris Article on Donta BrightMROA::RSCHOTTFri Mar 24 1995 16:037
         Did anyone else pick up on Donta Bright's response to Joe Burris,
    regarding his (Bright's) knowledge of fellow Dunbar H.S. Alum, Reggie
    Lewis?  Bright said he would not comment on Reggie Lewis.  Looks to me
    like another example of how deep UMASS' distrust of the Boston Globe
    runs.
    
    Russ
77.1491Its Almost Time!!!STRATA::BARBIERIFri Mar 24 1995 16:1817
      I couldn't help but have a good impression of the Globe so far
      as today's paper is concerned.  Both articles were very positive.
      They even went into Donta Bright and some of the critical things
      said about him related to scholastics.  He had his chance to respond
      and seemed well quoted.  I also noted the reggie Lewis response.
    
      Speaking of Bright, he had a good quote this past week on a local
      sports segment.  He was asked something about UMass' chances and
      his reply was something like, "We're talking the nets down."  And
      he immediately turned around and walked away.
    
      Well, next time I'm at work following the next UMass game, they just
      might be a Final 4 team!!!!!  Can you imagine?
    
      And not only that, but UMass/UConn is still a possibility!  WOW!!!
    
      HERE WE GO!!
77.1492MROA::RSCHOTTFri Mar 24 1995 18:2719
         I'm thinking that UMASS should advance this evening, and I will
    predict a score of UMASS 78, Tulsa 65.
    
         On paper, Tulsa looks a bit like Temple.  Big inside, but the
    front court players don't score much.  The guards are both good
    scorers, and favor the three point shot, but aren't great shooters.
    Tulsa plays both a zone and some man to man.  They rely on a press to
    rattle the opposition.  They have advanced in the Tourney with solid,
    low scoring wins over Illinois and Old Dominion.
    
         UMASS shouldn't have to play a spectacular game to win, but they
    will need solid performances from their starters and at least one sub.
    
    Russ
    
    - Based on what I've seen, UCONN and Kentucky, should be the
    co-favorites for the NCAA crown, judging by their play in the first
    three games.  
                                       
77.1493No joy in Mudville!MROA::RSCHOTTMon Mar 27 1995 12:2129
         Truth be told, I thought there were a few teams in the Tourney
    capable (I said CAPABLE) of laying a hurting on UMASS under the right
    circumstances.  Kentucky, Arkansas in a revengeful mood, and yes,
    Connecticut, if they had their running game going and hit a high
    percentage of threes.  After Saturday, I'd put UCLA in that group
    as well.  However, never in my wildest dreams (make that nightmares)
    would I put Oklahoma State in that category!
    
         Going in, I thought UMASS had the matchup advantage against the
    Okies at every position but two guard.  Like most folks I totally
    underestimated the size and skill Mr. Reeves brought to the table.
    Prior to the game Calipari and company worked on a plan to address the
    absence of Edgar Padilla, but by the looks of it, never came up with
    an answer for Big Country.  The end result, Reeves bullied Camby into
    foul trouble, and caused Roe to work so hard down on the blocks, he
    was worthless in the rebounding action and on the offensive end.  Roe
    missed several easy put backs in the first half, and had a couple of
    rebounds snatched away from him in the second.  How often has that 
    happened over the last four years?
    
         The most tellings stats .... Oklahoma St. outrebounded UMASS by
    11, and held the UM'ies to 27% from the field, AND OUTSCORED THEM BY
    19 IN THE SECOND HALF!  The 14 point final differential, was UMASS' worst
    defeat in two years!
    
         All in all, a pretty sorry Sunday!
    
    Russ
    
77.1494NBA Question MarksGLRMAI::WILKESMon Mar 27 1995 13:0017
    UMass despite all its talents lacked shooting talent at all positions.
    Unfortunately it caught up with them on Sunday.
    
    The game showed the potential NBA shortcomings of both Lou Roe and
    Marcus Camby. Camby is not physically or mentally ready to be a
    consistent impact player in the NBA. His ultimate potential is awesome
    but it is a real tough call as to whether he should go pro now.
    
    Lou Roe I think is an over-achiever who may have a lot of trouble
    producing day in and day out over the long grind of the NBA schedule.
    He seemed to wear down at the end of the season. He was very
    ineffectual in the two games this weekend. I am not sure he has good
    hands and he is a very bad habit of bringing rebounds downs to waste
    level where the quick guards can easily swat the ball away.
    
    In any case Lou should hope he is not drafted by the New Jersey Nets as
    he seems to play poorly whenever he returns to his home state.
77.1495Mind Not Working This AMGLRMAI::WILKESMon Mar 27 1995 13:044
    Should have proofread before I hit the send button.
    
    Meant to say "he has a bad habit of bringing the ball down to his
    WAIST"
77.1496HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Mar 27 1995 13:1417
  Hey it was only one game. Like any single game, it proves nothing. If this
were a best of 7 series there's no reason to believe UMASS wouldn't come right
back to win the next one. 

  It seemed that UMASS couldn't hit anything. Sure they were under a lot of
pressure, but even when they were opened they came up empty. Meanwhile OakSt
couldn't miss.

  Maybe UMASS should have let their big 7' 2" guy play more just to tire out
Big Country. That might have taken the pressure off the other guys. 

  Regardless it was a great season for UMASS. They got further than they ever
got before making it to the final 8. I guess that means they are as good as
the B.C. Eagles were last year. Either that, or this tourney isn't a very good
indicator as to who is the better team.

  George
77.1497Who got to the ref(s) between the half?AKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintMon Mar 27 1995 13:1522
    Russ you are being very generous in your game analysis in the sense of
    no comments on the refereeing.  Cal kept Camby basically inactive in
    the first half to reduce potential foul trouble and had him ready for
    the second half with a lead and only two fouls.
    
    Any and all chances UMass had depended on Camby and any fool could
    plainly see.  Someone got to the ref(s) between the halves!
    
    Camby picked up a cheap 3rd and was sat; immeadieately on reentering he
    was given a fourth, again for nothing.  The entire perspective of the
    officials toward the game changed between the halves.
    
    The UMass strategy in the first half was to use the OKst. agressiveness
    against them and this worked except UMass was very cold from the line.
    
    Of course OK st. used the absence of Camby and the impetus of the
    switch in referring in their obvious favor to play excellent ball and I
    have to give Reeves and Pierce and the guards credit for a fine game.
    
    But this was a textbook case of how ref's strategy can transform a game
    especially against a team so dependent on one man and where only 5
    fouls puts him out.
77.1498BIGQ::MCKAYMon Mar 27 1995 14:084
    I'll bet you a million that whoever runs the elite eight scheduling
    for next year matches up UCONN and UMASS.
    
    Jimbo  
77.1499HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Mar 27 1995 15:105
  So who's not back next year for UMASS?

  In other words, who are the Seniors and who might go to the NBA?

  George
77.1500SNAX::ERICKSONMoney + Boredom = MJMon Mar 27 1995 15:227
    
    	I believe Lou Roe and Derrick Kellogg are the only significant
    players not returning. Myers is a senior also. The only other question
    is if Camby turns pro or not. Maybe with "Big Country" man handling
    him, he will decide to stay in school.
    
    Ron
77.1501AKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintMon Mar 27 1995 15:5912
    Calipari made the decision not to match up Camby with Big Country. 
    Camby's performance thruout ncaas enhanced considerably his
    professional attractiveness.
    
    Reeves enhanced his own pro prospects by exhibiting a soft touch around
    the baseline.  I have to give credit to Sutton and his crew; the former
    won the coaching battle and I'm sure coach Cal would do things
    considerably different in hindsight: like just letting Camby play all
    40 minutes.
    
    I would also guess that Roe's injury problems (groin) were much worse
    than advertised (either that or he's simply a stiff).
77.1502UCONN InfoMROA::RSCHOTTMon Mar 27 1995 16:4511
    RE: 77.1498
    
         I read somewhere over the weekend that UConn has already committed
    to play either in the Hawaiian or Alaskan Preseason Tournament, and
    would be unavailable for the Elite 8 Tourney.
    
         Also, in the good news for UCONN department, Ray Allen has
    announced he will not declare for the NBA Draft, and will return to
    Storrs for his junior year.
    
    Russ
77.1503Game and Season ThoughtsSTRATA::BARBIERIMon Mar 27 1995 16:5387
  Well, the season is over and it ended a little harshly.

  My thoughts on the game...

  UMass has a LOT of positives as a reputation year after year (since
  Calipari).  They also are chronic in one negative way.  They can't
  shoot.  Oh sure, they have some good shooting games, but I don't think
  anyone ever really gets the feeling with them, "Watch out for this guy.
  He can really shoot!!"

  My summary feeling for the loss is that (outside of open perimeter
  shots and some offensive rebound putbacks) Umass could not obtain a 
  high percentage shot.  Period.  It wasn't like I would look at a shot
  and think that it ought to drop.  Too often, the inside shots looked 
  too hard.  Now why was that?  I suppose its gotta be Big Country.  Just
  having a 7' 300 lb mass in the paint has to effect the game.  In contrast,
  too often Oklahoma State had high percentage shots; Reeves had short range
  jumpers and State had more than a few easy transitions.

  One thing that surprised me is that UMass actually shot WORSE in the
  2nd half than in the 1st.

  To me the 2nd big thing was the front line ineffectivenss altogether and
  by this I mean Camby play-wise AND foul-wise and Roe play-wise.  The Globe 
  today said Roe's injury was actually fairly serious.  Well, if you couple 
  Roe's injury with Camby having those quick 2nd half fouls...thats tough.

  Putback shots were abysmal.  Dingle had an open one footer that wasn't
  close.  Roe missed at least one layup.  It was just a BAD shooting day
  made worse with the inability to get a good shot anyway.

  Finally, I question 2nd half strategy.  Late in the 1st half, UMass was
  able to retain the lead even though the shots continued to not fall.  They
  just kept going inside and collecting fouls.  Chianti (whatever - don't 
  remember last name) had 4 fouls and Pierce had 3.  The announcers said
  State could only go about 7 deep.  Based on that and UMass' poor shooting
  in the 1st half, I would have emphasized that inside game.  I also would
  have had Weeks in there more.  (He had a LOT of offensive rebounds in the
  1st half.)  I also would have considered fouling Norville out by having him
  POUND Reeves and (hopefully) frustrate him.  Instead, Oklahoma State commits
  one measly foul in the 1st 10 minutes of the 2nd half (which I find to be
  impossible given their physical style of defense).  But, perhaps this strategy
  was not possible as Roe said he was exhausted in the 2nd half.

  Bright had an absolutely HORRENDOUS game.  He reverted to his form of
  sometimes taking really low percentage shots (I counted three anyway)
  and he made no field goals.  They weren't even close and UMass did not
  rebound them.

  I thought Kellog and Travieso played well; Kellog playing a real fine
  game.

  One other thing.  Oklahoma State had a surprising number of easy transition
  baskets.  A lot more layups.

  Finally, when Oklahoma State grabbed their first 15 point lead, they TRIED
  to let UMass win - and UMass couldn't take advantage.  Dingle missed two
  free throws and a one foot put back.  Camby missed a jam.  Kellog was called
  for charging (questionable) on a dish out to Camby/jam.  There was a two
  to three minute span there where UMass could have come to within a point.
  That could have been the most frustrating part of the game.

  I think Camby needs to stay one more year.  Sunday's Globe quoted McHale
  as considering Big Country a solid NBA reserve center.  If thats the case,
  Camby can't handle solid reserve centers.  Duncan, in contrast, had 22
  rebounds against Oklahoma State.

  As far as the year goes, I am less than satisfied because my expectation
  was final four, but they satisfied me more this year than the last two.
  They not only went three games, the latter two were thrashings.  They had
  a looseness they seemed to lack come tourney time in other years (at least
  in the 2nd and 3rd games).

  Looking to next year, I envision a better team provided Camby stays.  Center
  will be better.  Small forward will be better with Dingle and Bright and I
  am hopeful Bright really blossoms.  Shooting guard will be better and I am
  also hopeful Travieso becomes a bona fide long range nightmare for other
  teams.  I think he is capable of providing long range accuracy that we have
  yet to consistently see.  We'll go down a notch or two with the absence of
  Roe, but Weeks and Norville ought to provide quite adept power forward play.
  Point guard scares me.  Thats where Andre Burkes injury sure hurt.  I don't
  know enough about Padilla to know what kind of full time PG he can be.

  Next year could be the best year yet (obviously provided Camby stays).  After
  that, they'll go down quite a few notches.

							Tony
77.1504A great season - something to be truly proud ofTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass to the Final Four!Mon Mar 27 1995 18:1919
    I am very surprised not more has been made of the injury factor.  UMass
    was able to press successfully early on, but weren't able to sustain
    it, mostly due to the fact that they only had two guards, and Kellogg
    and Travieso could not be expected to play 40 minutes of pressure
    defense.  That effectively eliminated UMass' best defense.
    
    And Lou Roe was seriously injured.  He didn't practice all week, played
    Friday night and reinjured his leg, and basically played on one leg all
    day yesterday.  You could tell right from early on when Lou had a layup
    off a steal and made it off the wrong leg!  He simply couldn't jump or
    move normally, and that limited what he could do.
    
    As for Camby - what a wuss!!!!  I'm getting pretty sick of his wimpy
    act.  Often when a big challenge comes, he doesn't step up to meet it.
    I'm kinda feeling like let him go to the pros and get the crap beaten
    out of him.  Maybe he can be the next Tim Perry.  He certainly is not
    ready to make a major impact in the NBA.
    
    NAZZ
77.1505Next year's roster - so farTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Mon Mar 27 1995 18:2316
    Coming back for UMass nexted season:
    
    C - Inus Norville, Marcus Camby (?)
    PF - Tyrone Weeks
    SF - Dana Dingle, Donta Bright, Rigo Nunez
    SG - Carmelo Travieso
    PG - Edgar Padilla, Andre Burks
    
    Already committed to UMass is 6-3 SG Charlton Clarks from NYC,
    supposedly a Top-50 player and a great shooter.  It would be nice to
    get one big guy to compliment Weeks, someone with some height.
    
    The only seniors-to-be of the returning players are the three small
    forwards.
    
    NAZZ
77.1506"Kellogg deserves some good words"AKOCOA::TROYMon Mar 27 1995 18:4818
    
    After the debacle yesterday, contrasted with the games against
    overmatched competition earlier - Camby sure came down a notch or two
    in my book.  He disappeared like RALPH SAMPSON from UVA used to - he is
    making a big mistake coming out this year unless he gets physically and
    mentally tougher - money or no.  
    
    After all the arrows and slings, I was glad to see Kellogg make the all
    tourney team - he played hard and worked to exceed all expectations for
    his career.  He played a solid game.
    
    I hope the shooting aspects of UMASS improve - I would hate to see them
    become a defense only team.  
    
    
    
    
    
77.1507WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MI Love the Dorito's Babies....Mon Mar 27 1995 19:038
    
    
        I think with one of those scholarships Coach Cal needs to go out
    and get a Big Body. It seems that Umass has trouble when they face up
    against a 7-0 footer 270-300 lbs. 
    
    
    Chap
77.1508Misc.LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Mar 27 1995 19:2613
      re: -1
    
      I had to laugh when I rwad your reply!  In the history of college
      basketball, I can only think of one guy who fits your criteria of
      who UMass has a problem matching up with!!!
    
      I feel a little better knowing that Roe was that hurt.  With him
      that hurt and another starter out, well, its gonna be hard to get
      the same performance.
    
      All in all, I feel real good about this year's team.
    
    						Tony
77.1509btw Camby will be outstanding pro and 1,2,3 in draftAKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintMon Mar 27 1995 19:5115
    I'm disappointed in the UMass response to Camby.  He had a fabulous
    game Friday night and a solid first half Sunday, albeit he was
    following coach's orders to save himself for the end of the game
    foul-wise.
    
    So he sits most of the second half after some of the cheapest fouls
    I've ever seen.  Is this the new political correctness I'm hearing from
    UMass fans - don't blame the coach, don't blame anyone else on the
    team, don't even blame the refs like normal fans would do but blame the
    star of the team because he's going pro.
    
    Stand up and blame the midwest/south domination of ncaa and
    intimidation of the refs like real fans.  Barbieri is the only one of
    you that's close on yesterday's game.
    
77.1510MROA::RSCHOTTMon Mar 27 1995 20:4026
         C'mon Bill, you should know us better than that.  UMASS fans
    will eat their young unless we can alledge a BC/Globe/Big East 
    conspiracy;^)!
    
         Actually, other than Big Country parking himself in the lane
    for some obvious but uncalled 3 second violations, I thought the
    reff'ing was OK.  They called some cheap'ies on Camby, but they were
    just evening out the foul discrepancy in favor of UMASS from the first
    half.
    
         I have a much higher opinion of Marcus Camby than Nazz, but he
    understands the demands of the NBA much better than I.  I don't believe
    Camby will be a top 5 draft choice this year, but will be next if he
    sticks around.  His poor game yesterday against an NBA type body, won't 
    help him this June.  But his potential, if his body develops as it should,
    is absolutely unlimited, and better in my opinion than either Joe Smith 
    or Rasheed Wallace.
    
    Russ
    
    - the frustration coming out, is that despite the tough game Oklahoma
      State played, UMASS played no where near their customary level 
      yesterday, for whatever reason.  Unlike UCONN who can
      be proud of the fact that they played a high quality game, but just ran
      into a buzz saw, Calipari and company will have to face up to the "what
      could have been" type questions.......
77.1511UConn was overmatched; UMass did not play up to their abilityTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Mon Mar 27 1995 20:5811
    I disagree with your analogy of how UMass and UConn will feel after
    their respective losses.  It was obvious UConn got beat by a better
    team and that the Huskies played as well as they can but simply lost
    to someone better.
    
    UMass (except for Camby) must feel that they would have won with a
    healthy Padilla and a 100% Lou Roe.  With those two at full strength,
    UMass wins a best of seven series vs Ok. State 4 games to 2.  On the
    other hand UConn loses 4 games to 1 in a best of 7 vs. UCLA.
    
    NAZZ
77.1512Camby last person I thought to blameAKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintMon Mar 27 1995 21:0224
    Russ I was afraid that I was taking the loss harder than you folks; I
    really took a bird on this one.  Re my ref remarks; they may seem like
    extremely sour grapes but I had bad thoughts between the halves to the
    effect of "Are those refs being sequestered?  Can nobody, not ncaa big
    shots, OSt folks, anyone at all, noone talk to them?!  I was afraid
    someone could reach them, I'm afraid someone did and used stats you
    mentioned as part of argument.
    
    Second Half - wife comes home...
    
    Then I was distracted and I heard "offensive foul" and I come back and
    Camby's on the bench, the lead is gone; he's back, back to the bench
    and finally back with an 8-10 point deficit, 4th foul and back to the
    bench.  When he finally played UMass came back but lacked finishing
    skills.
    
    UMass went to foul line a lot in first half but it was the result of
    the contrasting styles.  Okla st CHOSE to prevent the basket and take
    the foul; UMass to give the outside shot and block the drives.  Hitting
    Camby was hardly a make up it was a giveaway.
    
    And Camby if ever, hardly played Big C head to head at all.  The guy
    that will draft Camby will be McHale and he'll call Red immeadiately to
    gloat.
77.1513Camby has a lot of growing to doTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Mon Mar 27 1995 21:0611
    As a season ticket hoilder, avid follower, and attendee in the
    Meadowlands yesterday, let me say this about Camby:  IMO, he didn't
    step up to the two biggest challenges he faced this year.  Early in the
    season, he posted a 2 point, 5 rebound "effort" against Kansas. 
    Yesterday, he had a similar 6 point, 4 rebound game.
    
    It seems to me that Camby excels when he can play against player who
    are either smaller or of lesser talent.  When he plays against bigger,
    talented big men, he takes a hike.
    
    NAZZ
77.1514WRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatMon Mar 27 1995 21:5115
RE: Charlton Clarke

Nazz,

Where did you hear that Clarke (spelling?) has committed to UMass ?? 
As a season ticket holder myself, I've been attentatively listening for
any updates on his recruiting. Nothing I've heard suggest he's given a
committment yet. Ted Sarandis said last night on NECN (New Englad Cable News)
said that UMass was heavily recruting him (but did not mention a signing).

Apprently, Clarke and Wayne Turner had become good friends. Many were hoping
they would attend UMass together... of course Turner just committed to Kentucky.

Chris

77.1515Clarke out? Jackson in???TNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Tue Mar 28 1995 13:0615
    Never heard he had committed officially.  Word I heard from a high
    school tout when I was in Albany was that he was all but wrapped up and
    would announce during the April signing period.  Today in the Globe Joe
    Burris says he may be leaning toward Florida.  UMass desperately needs
    a player like him.
    
    Randall Jackson has not hit 700 on his boards, and while North Carolina
    is still his top choice, they are supposedly cooling on him, perhaps
    giving UMass a chance to get back in on him.  Jackson plays a lot like
    Camby, a shot blocker who likes to shoot jumpers and is a weak
    rebounder.  Jackson runs the floor as well as Camby and though he's not
    as strong, he is gifted defensively and would be a great replacement
    for when Marcus turns pro.
    
    NAZZ
77.1516We'll never knowAKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintTue Mar 28 1995 13:107
    Coach Cal uses a strategy with Camby which attempts to preserve Camby
    from foul trouble until the second half.  This worked earlier in the
    tournement and appeared to be working vs Ok.st.
    
    Camby only had 23 minutes vs Ok st most of that in the first half.  In
    hind sight Cal should have just let Camby play, as it is it looks like
    Camby will have to go pro now to show the doubters they're wrong.
77.1517Needed Camby/Bright/Dingle To Step Up OffensivelySTRATA::BARBIERITue Mar 28 1995 16:0112
      The more I've thought about it, the more it didn't seem like it
      would be a good game.  Roe hurting as he did and Padilla out.
      Suddenly depth is a problem and their patented pressure defense
      would be bound to wilt eventually.
    
      Knowing they would still need solid front line offensive output,
      the key to the game (upon realizing Roe was hurt) really was for
      Camby/Bright/Dingle to step up with strong front line offense.
    
      To me, thats where the main contribution was needed.  
    
      And thats where it was most lacking.
77.1518Coach Cal overmatchedMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 28 1995 16:598
    
      The Umass fan(s) trashing Camby are just taking their
     shots at Camby before Marcus bolts for the NBA despite 
     the best efforts of coach Cal to get Marcus to stay even 
     if it is not in Camby's best interest. If folks really 
     want to point fingers look no further than coach Cal himself. 
     Eddie Sutton gave Calipari a major wedgie Sunday.
    
77.1519more on CambyWMOIS::BALL_KTue Mar 28 1995 17:4514
    I think it was more of a case of Calipari outcoaching himself.  I
    didn't see Oklahoma do anything special, whereas UMASS tried to switch
    Roe and Weeks on to Big Country and it failed miserably.
    
    As far as Camby goes, in terms of his development, it would be better
    for him to stay so he could hone his offensive skills and GET STRONGER
    This is a guy who can't even stand the wear and tear of a college
    season (a FLUKE injury in BOTH seasons).  With his build he isn't ready
    to match up at center, or PF with the pros yet..I see alot of bench
    time for him for a few seasons
    
    But I agree, he doesn't deserve the blame he's getting here 
    
      
77.1520Tough to win a kickin' contest if you're a one-legged manTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Tue Mar 28 1995 18:347
    Tough to accept that Cal was outcoached, since he didn't have all his
    weapons.  The press was effictive early, but they couldn't stay with it
    with only two guards available to play.  The inside game with Roe was
    not an option with Lou's injury, so that left more of the offense in
    the hands of Camby and Bright, neither of whom stepped up.
    
    NAZZ
77.1521GLRMAI::WILKESTue Mar 28 1995 19:282
    Dana Dingle missed a couple of 1 foot shots that were relatively
    uncontested that certainly hurt the cause also.
77.1522Sandlot Coach Could've Called That GameSTRATA::BARBIERITue Mar 28 1995 19:306
      I agree Nazz.  Secondly, it isn't 'genius' coaching to dump
      it down low to a behemoth.
    
      In my level of play, I'm a VERY average passer, but I don't
      have much of a problem passing to a wide body.  Even I can
      coach that!
77.1523Coach's problem is he wants to be known as Gentleman JimAKOCOA::BREENThe roar of the paintTue Mar 28 1995 19:299
    You're still nagging Camby who couldn't step up if he wasn't on the
    court in the second half.  What Cal had to do was get a technical or
    even two and get thrown out prior to the fourth foul and even better
    Camby's third.
    
    I think Cal is smarting from his being personified as a road agent type
    coach and wants to make the Coach K level.  He should have caught a
    video Nolan Richardson 3 feet out on the floor in the Syracuse game
    protesting.
77.1524Sutton>Cal, Dean>PitinoMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 28 1995 20:3611
   >> I agree Nazz.  Secondly, it isn't 'genius' coaching to dump
   >> it down low to a behemoth.
    
      You wouldn't think it would take genius to stop it either but
      it was obviously beyond Calipari's grasp. Sutton beat UMass at
      its own game. They sealed the middle and dared UMass to beat
      them from the outside, they out muscled the Minutemen down low
      and beat them to most loose balls. Pretty much the entire second
      half was played at OSU's desired pace. UMass couldn't press but that
      was mainly because OSU wouldn't let them score and then beat them
      to the rebound. Impossible to press that way. 
77.1525LENNY!! LENNY!!STRATA::BARBIERITue Mar 28 1995 20:494
      re: .1523
    
      Was Lenny Wirtz there to see Nolan???  Or does Arkansas rate
      where in contrast UMass didn't?!!
77.1526TOOK::HALPINTIMEOUT!!! oops, never mind...Tue Mar 28 1995 21:3122
    
    
    
    	The key for both teams was the outside shooting. UMass couldn't
    hit an outside shoot to save its life, so the Cowboys were able to 
    pack it into the paint, harrass Camby & Roe, and crash the defensive
    boards. OK St.'s rebounding was critical to this game. I was
    especially impressed with Reeve's ability to control a rebound once
    he layed so much as a finger on it.
    
    	On the otherside, everytime UMass tried to deny Ok St. the inside
    game in the second half, Rutherford hit the trey (4-times in the 2nd
    half).
    
    	Oklahoma had the balanced offense. Umass didn't. Oklahoma St. won,
    Umass lost. 
    
    	The two coaches had little to do with the outcome of this game, the
    players who performed the best won....
    
    JimH
    
77.1527Sure. Uh-huh.MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 29 1995 12:458
    >> The two coaches had little to do with the outcome of this game, the
    >> players who performed the best won....
    
       Yes, it's mere happenstance that Ok State's opponents shoot so
       poorly from the field. Eddie Sutton has nothing to do with that.
       He's just a lucky SOB.    
    
77.1528Outside shots were about normal for UMass; they suffered insideTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Wed Mar 29 1995 13:488
    I respectfully disagree Jim.  UMass' problem was NOT outside shooting,
    it was inside shooting!  They missed at least a dozen layups, and Roe's
    injury didn't allow him to move effectively in the low blocks.  Also,
    they got very few second chances.  I thought the white guy #20 for
    Ok. State did a nice job on the defensive boards.  As noted previously,
    Dingle missed at least two wide open layups and Bright was useless.
    
    NAZZ
77.1529TOOK::HALPINTIMEOUT!!! oops, never mind...Wed Mar 29 1995 14:0325
    
    >>> The two coaches had little to do with the outcome of this game, the
    >>> players who performed the best won....
    >
    >   Yes, it's mere happenstance that Ok State's opponents shoot so
    >   poorly from the field. Eddie Sutton has nothing to do with that.
    >   He's just a lucky SOB.    
    
    	Oklahoma St. played an effective defense. Like I said, the players
    who performed the best won. Eddie Sutton deserves credit for preparing
    his team with a strategy that worked. His players executed better than
    the Umass players. I didn't see any evidence that the game was decided
    on any coaching decisions/changes made during the game.
    
    	Umass tried to do the same thing to Reeves. In the second half,
    they collapsed into the paint and forced Big Country to give up the
    ball. When he did, Rutherford hit the outside shot. The Umass guards,
    didn't at their end of the floor.
    
    	Like I said, I don't see how Sutton "out-coached" Calipari during
    the game. His team was better than Umass.
    
    JimH
    
    
77.1530Inside Scoring Was The ProblemSTRATA::BARBIERIWed Mar 29 1995 15:4924
      re: -1
    
      The first half score was 37-32 UMass.
    
      UMass was 4 for 7 in 3-pointers in the 2nd half.
    
      Oklahoma State was 4 for 7 in 3-pointers in the 2nd half.
    
      Now, how do you conclude that the key to the game was some
      difference in outside shooting?!!
    
      The contrast was difference in INSIDE shooting.  Check out 
      Reeve's 2nd half shooting percentage and recall that they
      were ALL inside shots.  Do the same for UMass.
    
      The problem was inside/frontline offensive scoring.
    
      As has been discussed, there were other factors.  The key being
      Padilla being out and Roe being hurt.  UMass lacked the depth to
      sustain their pressure defensive style for 40 minutes.  This was
      most caused by the loss of Padilla and the longer minutes logged
      by Kellog/Travieso.
    
    							Tony
77.1531TOOK::HALPINTIMEOUT!!! oops, never mind...Wed Mar 29 1995 16:3623
    
    
    
    	How many of Umass 2nd half three pointers were made in the
    last 4-6 minutes of the game? It was already out of reach at that
    point.
    
    	Early in the 2nd half, when OK State made their game winning
    run. Rutherford made three 3-point shots, two from the right side, one
    from the leftside, after Reeves had the ball down low and UMass
    converged on him. That was just enough to open up the Umass defense.
    Rutherford's only other trey was late in the game, right after
    Kellog hit a three to close the deficit to 7.
    
    	UMass didn't get the inside scoring because OK State was able
    to ignore the UMass guards and pack the lane. It also explains why 
    the Cowboys had 11-rebound over UMass. They had more people
    in the pain on both ends of the floor.
    
    JimH
    
    
    	
77.1532Just the way it is...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Mar 29 1995 16:5221
                    
    It seems to me that Calipari is being criticized on the same general
    terms that have always dogged one Dean Smith in here.  I hate to say 
    it, but for the third year in a row, the very first time a talented 
    UMass squad faced an equal or even slightly inferior team in the
    tournament, they've folded in a big way (didn't play their game, 
    whatever you want to call it).  They have not appeared to be
    disciplined or in control.  Maybe you can't pinpoint one thing but if 
    it becomes a trend then it's just reality that the coach receives some 
    heat.
    
    For my money, none of the so-called "Lou Roe Era" teams measured up to
    what the much less talented "Jim McCoy Era" team accomplished in 1992, 
    based mostly on expectation.  That team gave me what Curley/Eisley did 
    with Boston College last year, a great sense of excitement, 
    overachievement, and heart even in a failed run at the Final Four.  
    UMass' great teams under Calipari just haven't completed the deal yet.
    
    glenn
      
    
77.1533Great season that should have been moreTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Wed Mar 29 1995 17:0111
    I agree Glenn.  Virginia and Maryland were good, not great, teams and
    UMass should have beat them both.  This year, the injury factor played
    a major part in their loss, but as Lou Roe said, I'm not gonna use that
    as an excuse.
    
    It was a great season, but I won't be truly satisfied until UMass is
    the NCAA Champion.  
    
    BTW, Bill Bayno appears to be the frontrunner for the UNLV job.
    
    NAZZ
77.1534RE: "Jim McCoy Era"WRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatWed Mar 29 1995 17:0613
FWIW, the reason why the team was so good during the "Jim McCoy Era"
was Will Herndon. The team really took off when Herndon finished 
sitting out the requisite games due to his transferring from Dayton
(or was it Richmond?).

That team was a much better interior passing team (due directly to 
Herndon) and, I feel, a much better rebounding team.

There's no question that the addition of Camby has made this UMass 
team a better one. If Camby had been inserted into "Jim McCoy Era", 
however, I think that team would be superior to the current mix.

Chris
77.1535William HerndonSTRATA::BARBIERIWed Mar 29 1995 17:3824
      This time I don't think its fair to ignore the injury factor.
      Didn't someone in here say that Roe even shot a LAYUP off his
      other leg?  Not having Roe is a big loss.  Throw in Padilla
      out and include Williams (if you want to) and you're basically
      talking about a third of your preseason team.
    
      But, my expectations were final four.  I would have not felt 
      they performed below expectations had they lost to UCLA in the
      semi's (unless it was a blowout).
    
      Will Herndon remains my favorite UMass player if for nothing more
      than how enigmatic he was.  The guy was 6'3" and would outjump
      7 footers (witness the tip off against Conrad McRae of Syracuse).
      It wasn't even close.  Herndon looked to be at least 6" above
      McRea.
    
      He would also dribble the ball down the court when need be (witness
      his almost singlehandedly thwarting Kentucky's full court press once
      in awhile by dribbling the ball down the court).  As was said, he was
      a real nice passer.
    
      Alas, as with almost all UMass players, he lacked an outside shot!!!
    
    							Tony
77.1536MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 29 1995 18:4223
    
    >> UMass didn't get the inside scoring because OK State was able
    >> to ignore the UMass guards and pack the lane. It also explains why 
    >> the Cowboys had 11-rebound over UMass. They had more people
    >> in the pain on both ends of the floor.
    
       I must have watched a different game because I didn't see many
       (if any) uncontested perimeter shots in the second half at least 
       not on UMass' part. I tend to agree with Glenn. What we saw this 
       year with the unfailry maligned Marcus Camby is the same thing we 
       saw last year with Harper Williams when Calipari could be seen 
       mouthing the words "Harper, that's your fourth foul!" after Williams 
       had committed a bonehead play early in the second half of the 
       Virginia game. Coach Cal's teams don't come out and play smart 
       disciplined ball day in and day out. They can be extremely im-
       pressive or extremely ragged depending on whatever the fates 
       decide.
        
    
    	
    
    
    
77.1537Okie State is better than expectedBSS::MENDEZWed Mar 29 1995 18:4911
    Okie State has been under-rated for most of the year.  UMass losing
    to them should not have been that surprising.  Okie state plays very
    tough defense.  What makes "Big Country" so good is that he is a great
    passer.  I also think that Sutton finally has a good mix of players.
    BTW "Big Country" has played every minute of the their last three games.
    
    If somehow Okie State stays close to UCLA up until the half.  I will
    not be surprised to see them beat UCLA.  It is not so much that Okie
    State's teams have not played well so much as Okie State is playing
    reall well.  They have no real stars outside of "Big Country"; They
    are just playing well together.
77.1538TOOK::HALPINTIMEOUT!!! oops, never mind...Wed Mar 29 1995 19:0033
    
    
       >I must have watched a different game because I didn't see many
       >(if any) uncontested perimeter shots in the second half at least 
       >not on UMass' part. 
    
    	Now Tommy, you're not trying to draw me into an
    "endless-figure-skating-type debate" now are you??? :-)
    
    	No the shot were not uncontested, but Rutherford had no problem
    getting the ball and the shot off from 3-point land. The UMass guards
    came rushing out after the ball came out of the post. UMass adjusted,
    came out to cover the guards and then the middle opened up.
    
    
       >I tend to agree with Glenn. What we saw this 
       >year with the unfailry maligned Marcus Camby is the same thing we 
       >saw last year with Harper Williams when Calipari could be seen 
       >mouthing the words "Harper, that's your fourth foul!" after Williams 
       >had committed a bonehead play early in the second half of the 
       >Virginia game. Coach Cal's teams don't come out and play smart 
       >disciplined ball day in and day out. They can be extremely im-
       >pressive or extremely ragged depending on whatever the fates 
       >decide.
    
    		I agree with Glen (and what you said above) also. There
    does seem to be a trait of inconsistency in UMass...
    
    
    JimH
    
    
    
77.1539I wouldn't want you guys grading my term papers - you're too tough!TNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Wed Mar 29 1995 19:1211
    Inconsistency?!?!?!?!?!?!?
    
    THEY WERE 29-5, FER CRYIN' OUT LOUD!!!!!  They beat Arkansas by 24,
    Western Kentucky by 19, Penn by 33, Maryland by 11, Louisville by 12 - 
    all tournament teams!!!  They lost to Kansas by 6, twice to lowly GW
    without Camby, and once to Temple before the Ok. State game.  They had
    a 16 game winning streak this year!!!!!
    
    Don't know what you guys use as a yardstick for consistency!!!
    
    NAZZ 
77.1540MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 29 1995 19:3313
  >> Don't know what you guys use as a yardstick for consistency!!!
    
     How about squeaking by lowly Saint Peter's, mauling Stanford and
     then losing to Ok Sate? I didn't call them inconsistent (Jim Halpin
     did) but if I were to try and make such a case I would offer into
     evidence film of the improbable comeback against WVU at which point
     nothing more would be left to say. I'm just saying that they aren't 
     very well disciplined (read: "coached" if you like). UMass has had
     some gutsy and scrappy teams but I've yet to see a "heads-up" UMass
     squad (and no Jim Halpin this isn't your cue to resurrect the
     academics discussion).
    
77.1541HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Mar 30 1995 13:5814
  In an 1 game format any team can look inconstant. Remember the late time the
Celtics were in the playoffs against the Lakers? I think they won the 1st game
by 30 points then went on to lose the series. 

  Players run hot and cold and on any given day just about any of these teams
can win. It means almost nothing. 

  Now if UMASS had played OakSt in a best of 7 and had been swept or beaten in
5, that would mean OakSt was a better team. As it is, all they proved was that
they had a better day and get tickets to Seattle. 

  Great season for UMASS topped off by an all time best making the final 8.

  George 
77.1542MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 30 1995 15:497
    
  >> Now if UMASS had played OakSt in a best of 7...
    
     That's about the third time that you've said that, George. They
     don't play a seven game format, it's one and done. That's part
     of the beauty of it. The Bobby Knights and the Coach Ks can
     bring their troops to play every night. Calipari has to too.
77.1543#15 Richmond > #2 IndianaLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Mar 30 1995 17:198
      re: -1
    
      I disinctly remember a #15 ranked Richmond team dispatch #2
      ranked (and Bobby Knight coached) Indiana team a few years
      back.
    
      Apparently, Bobby Knight doesn't quite meet up to the standard
      you gave him.
77.1544Or It May Have Been RiderLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Mar 30 1995 17:191
    
77.1545MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Mar 30 1995 20:566
>      I disinctly remember a #15 ranked Richmond team dispatch #2
>      ranked (and Bobby Knight coached) Indiana team a few years
>      back.

       Richmond (and Cleveland State) have both beaten Indiana in the
       tournament, but the seedings were never so lopsided as #15 vs #2.
77.1546"Bill Bayno leaves UMASS"AKOCOA::TROYFri Mar 31 1995 12:205
    
    Bill Bayno has left UMASS as Calipari's top assistant to take the top
    job at UNLV - which had 3 different coaches last year.  Total
    compensation is $300k, according to today's Boston Globe.
    
77.1547a lot of style, no substanceUSCTR1::GARBARINObumhiem, lappas...idiotsFri Mar 31 1995 14:058
Bobby Knight has 3 NCAA Championships, if I was a Hoosier fan I could
take a rare 1st-round defeat once in a while.


An 'outsiders' view ?   As stated many times, Calipari is a Pitino-wannabee,
and to me, he's like his mentor in every way.  Great recruiter, highly
emotional, very image-concious, and yet to deliver in the Big Dance.
Whenever in-game coaching decisions are needed, none appear to be made.
77.1548You Blew Me Away!!STRATA::BARBIERIMon Apr 03 1995 14:198
      Yeah, Joe, I guess you blew me away!  I could handle a
      couple of early losses too if my team won it 3 times.
    
      Points well taken and Calipari seems like a Pitino
      'wannabe' to me too!
    
      Well, Calipari hasn't been in it real long.  Maybe the
      juries out...
77.1549USCTR1::GARBARINObumhiem, lappas...idiotsMon Apr 03 1995 17:024
>      Well, Calipari hasn't been in it real long.  Maybe the
>      juries out...

Definitely.  He's made progress.  Now he has to keep it going.
77.1550sounds like Camby will stayOUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaThu Apr 20 1995 18:456
77.1551Let's hope I'm wrong hereAKOCOA::BREENThu Apr 20 1995 20:0011
    I suppose one has to give coach Cal the benefit of the doubt and assume
    he's sincere, but I don't know for sure.  I sure hope that Cal hasn't
    simply been trying to hold onto his meal ticket.
    
    I've even questioned some of Cal's tactic re. the use of Camby.  It
    seems a lot like he doesn't want the world to know how good Camby
    really is so he'll have him as long as possible.
    
    Perhaps Camby can make a deal to stay and Calipari in return can
    showcase him in the offense and let him show the pros how good he is.
    Personally I still see Camby going 1,2,3 in the draft if he was in it.
77.1552OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaThu Apr 20 1995 20:112
77.1553exitCNTROL::CHILDSThu Apr 20 1995 20:196
    
    Cmon Mike, not many pros play defense for 10 minutes a night let
    alone 48. He'd do just fine. Besides it's easy to bulk up, just ask
    me.....
    
    ;^)
77.1554OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaThu Apr 20 1995 20:241
77.1555No question he'd have problems with Shaq thoAKOCOA::BREENThu Apr 20 1995 20:255
    I don't see him necessarily as a center but in the Dennis Rodman role
    except for actually playing some offense too.
    
    And for the 20th time his problem in ncaa quarterfinal was not with Big
    C but with the refs.
77.1556OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaThu Apr 20 1995 20:261
77.1557I'm actually looking for serious inputAKOCOA::BREENThu Apr 20 1995 20:409
    I was distracted at the start of the half and I couldn't tell if one
    ref called fouls 2,3 (and later 4 the minute he came back in after a 7
    minute sit).  I'd really like to know and don't have the game on tape.
    
    And as someone said, it could've just happened; the refs may have
    looked at the stats (fouls went umass way) for the first half and
    adjusted, someone from ncaa marketing make a "suggestion"...
    
    Are you saying the refs for the game were acc refs.
77.1558clarificationCNTROL::CHILDSThu Apr 20 1995 20:467
    
    No Bill, he's not. clemson refs is one of sports' trademarks for 
    bias refereeing. We used to have a big clemson fan in here who 
    claimed every game they ever lost was because of the refs, hence
    the reference to clemson refs, when anyone calls a ref bias.....
    
    mike
77.1559CambyLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Apr 20 1995 20:5211
      Camby's complete inability to score against Oklahoma State
      suggests to me he isn't ready.  I don't think his fouls 
      were a result of offensive moves, i.e. for the bulk of the
      game, his foul situation should not have had any impact on
      his offensive game.
    
      Anybody check out the long reply on that troubled high school
      kid that verbally agreed to UMass, but may have backed down?
      Sure looks like a god prospect tho!!
    
    						Tony
77.1560"They've bought one of the refs in Lexington..!"AKOCOA::BREENThu Apr 20 1995 20:559
    Sounds like what we used to call a "Charley Deal".  Clemson!!! I never
    would have guessed that, they've always been able to lose entirely on
    their own.
    
    But it is true that in the south the role of the refs is discussed a
    lot more, but I'd pick Kentuckians as the model there.  The main reason
    I've beat this horse is that before it ever happened (if it did) I had
    a bad feeling and as I told Leary once we used to look for it in the
    NIT when Notre Dame was involved.
77.1561critical ones were offensiveAKOCOA::BREENThu Apr 20 1995 21:0311
    His second foul which I heard but didn't see was an offensive foul and
    either the 3rd or 4th was called for over the back on an offensive
    rebound.  Given that this foul was the game breaker and quite a chicken
    foul you can see where I'm coming from.
    
    Strangely Jack Craig (of all people) did his Glove media critique of
    the failing of Quinn Buckner to point out the Camby foul situation and
    how critical it was.  No media, not Sarandis, Globe regulars, SI, AP
    mentioned the fouls never mind centered the game story on them.
    
    Maybe WSJ will run a piece on it
77.1562IMBETR::DUPREZFri Apr 21 1995 12:3217
How long has it been since the final UMass game?

C'mon Bill Breen, GIVE IT UP!  :-)

I can just see it now.  An elite cadre of ClemsonRefs(tm), trained to follow
UMass throughout their schedule, and then, at a key moment, drug and abduct
the regular refs, insert themselves as the refs, and completely destroy UMass'
chances of winning.

UMass has no more beef than any other team.

Get on with your life.  It's springtime.  You can golf, hike, play baseball,
lacrosse, etc.  You can live a fuller, richer life.  All you have to do is
say, "the college basketball season is OVER"...

Roland
77.1563IMBETR::DUPREZFri Apr 21 1995 12:333
Apologies for any misspelling of "ClemsonRefs" - I just thought it was
more important to include the trademark...
77.1564OUTSRC::HEISERthe dumbing down of AmericaFri Apr 21 1995 15:402
77.1565Maybe it's because I was the only one to see the gameAKOCOA::BREENFri Apr 21 1995 19:4113
    No the WSJ implied that back prior to the '93 tourney but could only
    point out the way the advertising was being sold could put pressure on
    the ncaa to provide finalist from a list of dookies,tarheels etc.  This
    basic subject of the influence of tv was big in the 60s but apparently
    is so all encompassing today that we simply live with.
    
    The whole idea of a Packer or an Enberg (SuperBowl) working from scripts
    supplied by tv producers (and calling the whole thing "preparation" or
    homework) sets alarm bells off in this old bean anyway.
    
    But I'm not the one rehashing UMass-OSt, I see postings of "Camby
    can't play Big C so he shouldn't come out" and I at least have to set the
    record straight.
77.1566But, He Still Couldn't ScoreLUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Apr 24 1995 17:439
      re: -1
    
      C'mon guy!  Camby couldn't score at all!Even if you consider
      the offensive fouls, as you said they were for things like
      over the back.  He wasn't in trouble (as in potential to foul)
      when he had the ball and might try to score.  The fouling had 
      nothing to do with his inability to score.
    
      He flat out couldn't score and thats a straight record.
77.1567You'all keep doing this to meAKOCOA::BREENTue Apr 25 1995 16:302
    He couldn't score because he only played 23 minutes and  his ability to
    move on offense had been taken away by the refs.
77.1568IMBETR::DUPREZTue Apr 25 1995 16:484
Stop it.  Stop it!  STOP IT!  STOP IT!!!

You're killing me, Bill...  :-)
77.1569Charlton Clarke is UMass' first signingWRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatWed Apr 26 1995 13:2818
The New York Times, New York Newsday and Greenfield recorder are all
reporting that Charlton Clarke has signed with UMass.

Clarke is physically very strong and is a good shooter out to 3 point range.
However, he is not quick or athletic in the mold of the premier 2Gs in this
class (Vince Carter, Louis Bullock, Rashamel Jones, Anton Reese, Kris Clack,
Chauncey Billups).  His biggest asset is his on court leadership, being a
very positive, vocal player.  He's a good finisher inside and can drive to
the basket.  He needs to improve his shot selection.  He has PG skills,
though, and could help as a backup PG in addition to playing 2G.  Right now,
I most rate him in the mid 30s.  He has not yet qualified - the last I heard
he was around a 650 on the SAT.


Chris

p.s. Another report I've read is that Lari Ketner and Terrell Stokes are next 
to sign (though this report is less reliable)
77.1570The real question is, who replaces Jason Germain?TNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Wed Apr 26 1995 14:534
    Ketner was seen at the UMass banquet Sunday night.  Don't know who
    Stokes is.
    
    NAZZ
77.1571who are these guysWMOIS::BALL_KWed Apr 26 1995 15:464
    Does anyone know anything about these two potential signees 
    (Ketner or Strokes) ?
    
    					KB 
77.1572some infoMROA::RSCHOTTWed Apr 26 1995 17:0627
         Lari Ketner is a 6'9" 230 lb., center/forward out of Roman
    Catholic H.S. in Philadelphia.  I believe I read somewhere that he came
    to the U.S. from Poland, fairly recently.  As a junior, he was MVP of
    the Philadelphia Catholic League, averaging 22 pts/13 rebs per game.
    Most of the recruiting/scouting services have him ranked in the 65 to
    100 range (1 being the concensus best high school player in the
    country).
    
         Terrill Stokes is a 5'11' point guard, from Simon Gratz H.S., also
    in Philadelphia.  He averaged 10 points a game as a junior.  Early on
    the speculation was that he was headed to Temple to join former H.S.
    teammate Lynard Stewart, however with the emergence of Johnny Miller 
    and Temple's recruitment of the higher rated Rasheed Brokenborough, I
    guess he figured he wouldn't get the PT.  Likewise, the recruiting
    services seem to place him in the 50 to 100 range.  Actually, Chris
    Kniker's note was the first mention I've seen that Stokes was seriously
    considering UMASS.
    
    Russ
    
    - I've heard that Jameel Watkins, a 6'9" PF out of NYC is down to 
      Providence or UMASS, for his college choice, though that's somewhat
      old news, and he may have committed to the Friars (or elsewhere) by
      now.   Supposedly UMASS was also in the running for 2G Preston Murphy
      out of Detroit, but maybe the Clarke signing has closed the book on
      that one.
               
77.1573WMOIS::BALL_KWed Apr 26 1995 19:078
    Thanks for the info..
    
    looks like if they land these two guys it will be an ok recruiting year
    after all.  I was worried they weren't going to get anybody.
    ...now if they can only get Camby to stay, they can have a reasonable 
    shot at the title next year 
    
                                                        KB
77.1574MROA::RSCHOTTThu Apr 27 1995 14:4214
         As Chris Kniker reported yesterday, Charlton Clarke officially
    signed with UMASS.  Assistant Coach Bruiser Flint, perhaps a bit 
    optimistically, calls him "one of the top 30 players in the country".
    
         The Herald also stated that Ketner and Stokes are the next two
    targets.  I erroneously overstated Ketner's junior year stats in
    yesterday's note.  As a junior he averaged 15 ppg, 13 rpg, and 4 bpg.
    
         The recruitment of Terrill Stokes could signify the end of Andre
    Burks career with the Minutemen.  Burks ACL injury, and then subsequent
    team rule violations and legal problems have cast a major cloud over
    his once promising future.
    
    Russ
77.1575USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Apr 27 1995 17:5510
>         Lari Ketner is a 6'9" 230 lb., center/forward out of Roman
>    Catholic H.S. in Philadelphia.  I believe I read somewhere that he came
>    to the U.S. from Poland, fairly recently.

You have him confused with Rafal Bigus, another Phila HS center.  These
two are the best big men in Philly this year.

I just read a wire report yesterday that Ketner is leaning toward
Pittsburgh, over Syracuse.  And Stokes' top three choices have been
Syracuse, Maryland and Xavier.  I've never heard UMass mentioned.
77.1576MROA::RSCHOTTFri Apr 28 1995 12:1327
    RE:  Ketner
    
    Yeah Joe, I believe I did mix up the biographical data I had on Bigus
    and Ketner.  Based on stats alone, Bigus did have the better junior
    year.
    
    Regarding recruiting, until the ink is dry on the Letter on Intent, its
    hard to predict where these kids are going to end up.  In recent weeks,
    sources close to the UMASS Basketball Team have made statements like
    "he's leaning towards UMASS over Maryland" and "he's all wrapped up
    (for UMASS)" when speaking about Ketner.  Ketner did attend the UMASS 
    Basketball Breakup Dinner last Sunday night in Amherst.  By the same 
    token, it sounds like Pittsburg and Syracuse are putting their own 
    positive spin on the situation.  BTW, I believe LaSalle has also been 
    under consideration by Ketner.
    
    The situation with Stokes is different, in that UMASS has evidently
    only recently become involved with him.  None of the recruiting
    propaganda that I collect listed UMASS as a school he was considering.
    
    I haven't seen any confirmation on where PG Ed Cota of Brooklyn is
    heading.  Supposedly he is a "late bloomer" having played well at the
    summer camps and then having had a great senior year.  Does anyone have
    any information on him?
    
    Russ
                           
77.1577"Camby stays"AKOCOA::TROYWed May 17 1995 15:532
    
    According to the Boston Globe: Camby stays, Kettner still in running.z
77.1578Finally for interstate bragging rights we have...AKOCOA::BREENWed May 17 1995 20:045
    I see the long awaited UMass - UConn battle of contending teams is on
    today at Princeton (Hobey Baker field?) - in Softball
    
    Speaking of Baker - he is in both Football and Hockey hall of fames,
    the latter beside Rocket, Shore and Lady Byng.
77.1579MROA::RSCHOTTWed May 17 1995 20:1412
         The UMASS Softball Team is led by a pitcher by the name of Kelly
    (or is it Katie) Daut, who pitches nearly every game.  Given that the
    UMASS ladies have won 40 games, she has a pretty resilient arm!  Over
    the weekend, she pitched both ends of a doubleheader!
    
         The UMASS Men's Baseball Team isn't too shabby either, as they
    meet Siena on Thursday, in a three round series for entrance to the
    NCAA's.  The UM'ies defeated Siena in a lopsided game earlier in the
    season, but on Thursday Siena will start Tim Christman on the mound,
    one of the premier collegiate hurlers in the country.
    
    Russ
77.1580BIGQ::MCKAYThu May 18 1995 13:073
    Well who won????  I'll guess UCONN 8*)
    
    Jimbo
77.1581MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu May 18 1995 13:2711
>         The UMASS Men's Baseball Team isn't too shabby either, as they
>    meet Siena on Thursday, in a three round series for entrance to the
>    NCAA's.  The UM'ies defeated Siena in a lopsided game earlier in the
>    season, but on Thursday Siena will start Tim Christman on the mound,
>    one of the premier collegiate hurlers in the country.

     Christman may or may not pitch.  He generally is their number 1 starter,
     and leads the country in K's per 9 innings (60 K in 41 2/3 ip), but he
     did not pitch at all in the MAAC tournament.  If Christman doesn't start,
     Siena probably goes with Ira Tilton (6-2 5.59) who opened the MAAC tourney
     against Iona.
77.1582Actually I haven't looked,but couldn't resistAKOCOA::BREENThu May 18 1995 14:008
     >                      <<< Note 77.1580 by BIGQ::MCKAY >>>
    >
    >    Well who won????  I'll guess UCONN 8*)
    >
    >    Jimbo
    
    
    I couldn't tell you, I only get the glove 
77.1583Won't know until late tomorrowTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks for a great year UMass!Thu May 18 1995 14:473
    The game is tomorrow at 1:00 PM.
    
    NAZZ
77.1584MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu May 18 1995 19:084
	UMass won the opener, 6-3, behind their ace Jay Murphy.
	Loser was Siena starter Ira Tilton.  Dennis Hogan, is starting
	the second game for Siena (not Christman), and UMass leads 5-0
	in the second inning.  Looks good for the Minutepeople.
77.1585MIMS::ROLLINS_RFri May 19 1995 13:312
	Anyone have the line scores/batteries for yesterday's UMass
	baseball games ?
77.1586From the GlobeMROA::RSCHOTTFri May 19 1995 14:5923
    Re:  77.1585
    
    First Game:
    
       Siena     3 6 1
       UMASS     6 9 0
    
       S - Ira Tilton (6-3) and P.J. Buonocore;  M - Jay Murphy (8-3) and
       A.Pelis.  HR - S - Paul Wilders;  M - Nate Murphy
    
    Second Game
    
       Siena     9 12 0
       UMASS    15 15 3
    
       S - Dennis Horgan, Eric Bairn (5), Craig Johnson (8), Fonz
       Napolitano (9) and Buonocore;
       M - Chad Paronto, Jason Bennett (4), and Pelis
       HR -  M - Bill Knight, Muchie Daglierere (2), Nelson Ubaldo, Ryan
       Jette
    
       Records - Siena (31-17);  UMASS (38-12)
                                              
77.1587Gotta be an alias!TNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics coach? I'm available!Fri May 19 1995 19:471
    Fonz Napolitano????
77.1588The NCAA'sMROA::RSCHOTTTue May 23 1995 12:2914
         The UMASS Men's Baseball Team is off to Coral Gables, Florida this
    weekend to compete in the NCAA Men's Baseball Tournament.  On Friday,
    it will be No.1 seeded (in the Atlantic II Seeding) Miami at 42-14,
    versus the No.6 seeded Minutemen at 38-12.
    
         48 Teams participate in the Tourney, with the final 8 competing
    next month in Omaha in the College World Series.
    
         This particular UMASS Team is one of the best hitting UMASS groups
    that I can remember.  The downside is that the pitching staff lacks a
    superstar, as evidenced by the team's ERA.  Lot's of 12 to 8 ball games
    this season.
    
    Russ
77.1589good newsWMOIS::BALL_KFri May 26 1995 15:447
    
    According to a Local paper someone brought in, Lari Ketner (6-10 from 
    Philadephia) signed with UMASS.                       
    
    I still think they need another guard but it probably too late
    
    							KB
77.1590Calipari talking. Going?HBAHBA::HAASterminal deliriumWed May 31 1995 14:1610
What's the deal with Calipari?

Firsted, I heard he was up talking to the Celtics. Now, there's a rumor
that he's talking to the Heat. Calipari, who's claiming that he's staying
with UMass, is said to be a hot property in the NBA for the nexted year.
Supposedly, he's only talking to 'em outta courtesy.

What's impolite about "No Thanks"?

TTom
77.1591If someone comes knockin', it don't hurt to listenTNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics coach? I'm available!Wed May 31 1995 14:174
    According to ESPN, Calipari talked with the Heat lasted week, discussed
    the situation for two hours, then told them he wasn't interested.
    
    NAZZ
77.1592for the record ...HBAHBA::HAASterminal deliriumWed May 31 1995 14:203
So Nazz, you saying he's staying?

TTom
77.1593USCTR1::GARBARINOWed May 31 1995 14:291
Calipari's greatest asset (recruiting) won't do him much good in the NBA.
77.1594HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed May 31 1995 14:316
  I hope he does take the Celtics position, I bet he'd do a good job.

  The question would then be, would Carr listen to what he had to say about
getting the talent that the Celtics need.

  George
77.1595MROA::RSCHOTTWed May 31 1995 14:5518
         Supposedly, Coach Cal has given assurances to both Marcus Camby
    and recruit Charlton Clarke that he would be back next year.  So we'll
    see how well his word holds up, when the pro's start making $1M+/year
    job offers.
    
         This all could be a ploy to get a few additional years tacked on
    to his UMASS contract, though he probably could get an extension
    anytime he asked for one, provided there are no future embarrassing 
    articles in the Globe or NCAA investigations of the program.
    
         I too question how well his act would go over in the NBA.  His
    style is to get right in the face of anyone not hustling or making
    mental mistakes, and that doesn't seem to go over well with these
    overpaid prima donnas!  And since 99% of NBA Coaching jobs seem to be
    3 year trial runs, and then get fired, I question why any successful
    college coach would want the headache.
    
    Russ
77.1596HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed May 31 1995 15:0513
  Coach Cal's not stupid, most likely he'd adjust his style for the bigs to be
less of an in your face type player. In fact, a great coach is one that can
make the decision on a case by case basis as to how a player should be handled.

  As for why he'd try, it's the NBA, the top of the heap, king of the pile,
it's where the best and most capable players play the highest caliber of
basketball in the world. I would expect that a competitive coach would want
a shot sooner or later seeing if he could make it in the big leagues.

  And even if it didn't work out he could always take the big bucks he earned
during his try and return to the college level.

  George
77.1597be like Rick?HBAHBA::HAASmay not have happenedWed May 31 1995 15:085
Maybe Coach Cal needs to do that Rick Pitino thang: sign up for the pros;
work a couple of years; realize that you don't need the headaches and
move back to college.

TTom
77.1598Coach Cal will stay at UMass for nexted seasonTNPUBS::NAZZAROCeltics coach? I'm available!Wed May 31 1995 15:437
    I've said this before and I'll say it again:  Coach Cal will not go
    to the pros.  When Dean Smith resigns (which of course he should have
    done years ago!), Roy Williams will leave Kansas to take that one job
    he has always wanted, and Coach Cal will replace him at Kansas to take
    the one job that he's always wanted.
    
    NAZZ
77.1599Charlton Clarke has qualified (?)WRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatTue Jul 11 1995 17:126
Latest bit of information from the rumor wire says that Charlton
Clarke has qualified for freshman eligibility. Don't know how accurate
the information is... (the rumor supposedly originates from his high school
coach).

Chris
77.1600Clarke is eligible; Ketner is a Prop. 48TNPUBS::NAZZAROHow can people live in Florida?Fri Jul 28 1995 15:2624
Thursday's Globe did a nice piece on Coach Cal, who is coaching the East 
team in the Olympic Festival.  He talked about several topics, including the 
fact that he hasn't signed the contract extension he and the school agreed
to a month ago.

There is a kid playing for the East team named Ruben patterson, who is a
6-7 small forward who scored 21 points in their win over the West.  He was
described as the best player on the team, and is returning to some JC in
Kansas this season, but Coach Cal is recruiting him for next year.  This
kid had scholarship offers from Cincinnati, Michigan, and Ohio State, but poor
grades sent him to the JC route.  He did confirm that UMass was recruiting him.

On another matter, Cal said Andre Burks might transfer to a junior college 
for a year, then come back to UMass.  A junior college may help him get his 
life in order.  "He was following the wrong lead" is how the coach put it.  

He said the team has eight solid players, in addition to scrubs Rigo Nunez
and Teddy Cottrell.  He said they have three solid guards, and if Burks comes
back, we'll have four solid guards.  Look for Charlton Clarke to see time
at both guard positions if Burks does not return.

NAZZ
    
77.1601that dotted line have you worried NazzAKOCOA::BREENMon Jul 31 1995 16:144
    So why hasn't Cal signed the contract.  Seems I recall Mike Milbury not
    "signing" a contract awhile back.
    
    Are there some bigwigs worried about the money?
77.1602Hardest nonconference schedule in the countryTNPUBS::NAZZAROHow can people live in Florida?Mon Jul 31 1995 20:1923
    Just got word of the UMass nonconference schedule.  If this isn't the
    toughest out-of-conference list anywhere, I'd hate to be the team that
    is playing a more difficult one.
    
    Fortunately, there is one (but only one) breather - BC at the Fleet
    Center.  UMass also plays another Big East team, much-improved Pitt 
    at Pitt.
    
    There are four ACC teams on the schedule - the Minutemen play North
    Carolina State in the opening round of the Rainbow Classic. When they
    get back from Hawaii, UMass will play an as yet unnamed opponent in
    the Great Eight tournament.
    
    In addition, UMass will entertain Wake Forest at Mullins and journey to
    the Meadowlands to take on Georgia Tech.
    
    Memphis comes to the Centrum this year, while last year's opponent in
    the Centrum, Louisville, will play host to UMass.
    
    Finally, Maryland and UMass will meet for the third straight season,
    this time in a Christmas tournament.
    
    NAZZ
77.1603BC a breather last year, not thisAKOCOA::BREENTue Aug 01 1995 14:248
    I don't see BC as any breather at the Fleet Center, and most of this
    "iron' is at UMass.  Looks like the toughest of the whole bunch is
    Memphis but that's at home too.
    
    After Kentucky and NC in '93 and Arkansas and Kansas last year this
    looks like a dropoff for them.  It's good to see them play a lot of
    non-conference teams given the dropoff in quality overall in the A-10
    lately.
77.1604USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Aug 01 1995 17:317
>    It's good to see them play a lot of
>    non-conference teams given the dropoff in quality overall in the A-10
>    lately.

This has been pointed out many times before.  While I admire their taking
on good non-conference opponents, it can't be over-looked that if they
have national title aspirations, they must.
77.1605Going to 12 teams strengthens the A10TNPUBS::NAZZAROHow can people live in Florida?Tue Aug 01 1995 19:075
    Adding Xavier and getting rid of stiff teams like West Virginia and
    Rutgers can only help the A10.  The Musketeers give the A10 four legit
    top 25 teams for nexted season (UMass, Temple, GW, Xavier).
    
    NAZZ
77.1606GO MUSKETEERS! WATTA TEAM!HBAHBA::HAASbuggedTue Aug 01 1995 19:090
77.1607USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Aug 01 1995 21:055
>    Adding Xavier and getting rid of stiff teams like West Virginia and
>    Rutgers can only help the A10.

Wasn't Rutgers one of the better teams in the A-10 year-in-and-year-out
until recently ?
77.1608Rutgers was good only for a couple of yearsTNPUBS::NAZZAROHow can people live in Florida?Wed Aug 02 1995 13:404
    Rutgers has never won an A10 title, and has had a losing record in 
    seven of the last ten years.
    
    NAZZ
77.1609AKOCOA::BREENWed Aug 02 1995 15:1110
    I must have known but forgot about Xavier, a good team year in, out.
    
    West Virginia was one of the stronger teams, Rutgers was more of a
    power in the old ECAC.  Both may do better in the BE.
    
    Temple and GW for top 25?  Maybe top 35.  Have they rebuilt?  What's
    Yinka Dare doing these days?
    
    Couldn't that market have been big enough for Temple and Villanova both
    to have been in the Big East, Temple is in there in football anyway.
77.1610CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Aug 02 1995 15:144
    
    Big East coaches were scared of Chaney's defense. 
    
    mike
77.1611Temple only lost Brunson, and recruited wellTNPUBS::NAZZAROHow can people live in Florida?Wed Aug 02 1995 17:363
    Not to mention his left hook!
    
    NAZZ
77.1612still a BE fan thoughCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Aug 02 1995 18:226
    
    Plus Chaney will play anybody, anywhere, anytime......It's easier
    to get lucky at the Vatican, than it is to get the BE coaches to
    take the creampuffs off their schedules.............
    
    mike
77.1613#1 HS player in Boston commits to UMassTNPUBS::NAZZAROI'll make a good Gordon, GordonWed Sep 20 1995 14:1211
    UMass announced its first signing for nexted season yesterday:  6-2 G
    Monte Mack from South Boston HS.  Mack averaged 23 ppg, 8 rpg, and 4
    apg last year while leading Southie to the state title.  He also is a
    mainstay on the highly successful BABC AAU team.
    
    Mack said he has wanted to go to UMass for the last two years.  He
    likes their style of play and their coaching staff.  He is a slashing
    guard who is a true team leader.  He's very quick, plays excellent
    defense, but needs to work on his outside shot.
    
    NAZZ
77.1614Incredible road schedule:Ky, Ga Tech, Florida, NC State, PittTNPUBS::NAZZAROI'll make a good Gordon, GordonThu Sep 21 1995 15:1037
	1995-96 UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BASKETBALL SCHEDULE
			(home games in Caps)

	Tue.  Nov. 7    INTERNATIONAL EXHIBITION
	Tue.  Nov. 28   Kentucky (Great 8 @ Auburn Hills, MI)
        Sat.  Dec. 2 - Sun. Dec. 3  Franklin Bank Classic
		  UMass vs. Florida, GWU vs. Maryland
	Wed.  Dec. 6	WAKE FOREST
	Sat.  Dec. 9    Boston College @ The Fleet Center
	Tue.  Dec. 12   NORTH CAROLINA - WILMINGTON
	Fri.  Dec. 22   Georgia Tech @ The Meadowlands
        Wed.  Dec. 27 - Sat. Dec. 30 Rainbow Classic @ Honolulu
                  First round:  UMass vs. N.C. State
	Thu.  Jan. 4    Memphis @ Worcester Centrum
	Sat.  Jan. 6    * DAYTON
	Tue.  Jan. 9    * @ St. Joseph's
        Sun.  Jan. 14   * @ St. Bonaventure
        Wed.  Jan. 17   * URI
        Sat.  Jan. 20   * @ Duquesne
        Tue.  Jan. 23   @ Pittsburg
        Sat.  Jan. 27   * ST. BONAVENTURE
        Tue.  Jan. 30   * FORDHAM
        Thu.  Feb. 1    * @ Temple
        Sun.  Feb. 4    * @ Xavier
        Tue.  Feb. 6    * @ Fordham @MSG
        Sun.  Feb. 11   * TEMPLE
        Thu.  Feb. 15   * LASALLE
        Sat.  Feb. 17   * @ Virginia Tech
        Tue.  Feb. 20   * @URI @Providence CC
        Sat.  Feb. 24   * GEORGE WASHINGTON
        Wed.  Feb. 28   * ST. JOSEPH'S
	Sat.  Mar. 2    @ Louisville

	* = Atlantic 10 Conference games

     NAZZ
77.1615Recruiting NewsMROA::RSCHOTTThu Sep 21 1995 16:1020
         The UMass Basketball Team announced its second verbal commitment 
    this week (following Boston's Monte Mack on Tuesday), with the news 
    that 6'5" small forward/2 guard Winston Smith from Elizabeth, N.J. would 
    be coming to Amherst next season.  Most of the recruiting rags have 
    Mack and Smith ranked among the Top 75 senior prospects, currently
    playing High School Hoop.
    
         Reportedly, UMass is being considered (along with the usual band
    of suspects) by, and is interested in the following recruits:
    
    6'9" Malik Allen   Medford Lakes, N.J.        <a concensus Top 20>
    
    6'9" Shamel Jones  Brooklyn Paul Robeson H.S. <also a concensus Top 20>
    
    6'5" Tommy Polley  Baltimore Dunbar H.S.
    
    6'7" Reuben Patterson  JUCO
    
    Russ
              
77.1616Don't know if theyt are a 2-for-1 packageTNPUBS::NAZZAROI'll make a good Gordon, GordonThu Sep 21 1995 17:416
    Also, the Babul brothers from North Attleboro, 6-6 small forward twins
    Jon and Mike, made an official recruiting visit to UMass last week. 
    Jon is considered in the top 50-75 category; Mike is not as highly
    regarded.
    
    NAZZ
77.1617Bubal brothers have big shoes to fillAKOCOA::BREENThu Sep 21 1995 18:185
             The sons of the Prophet were valiant and bold,
               And quite unaccustomed to fear;
             And the bravest of all was a man, so I'm told
               Called Abdullah Bulbul Amir.
 
77.1618Chump change for RoeMROA::RSCHOTTFri Oct 06 1995 11:279
         The Globe reports that Lou Roe signed a one year deal with the 
    Detroit Pistons for the NBA minimum, $200K/per year.
    
         My guess is that under the new salary rules, 1st rounders are
    mandated a certain minimum, and that all bets are off for second
    rounders.  Anyone know if that's the case?  If so, sliding to the top
    of the second round cost Sweet Lou some serious change!
    
    Russ
77.1619AKOCOA::BREENMon Oct 09 1995 20:425
    I sure looks like that Russ, Junior Bridgeman had to sign for the $200 k
    too.  In the long run if Lou and Junior can progress (partly from the
    incentive to make some money) they may be better off than the high #1s.
    
    Also their low salary will allow them to be kept. 
77.1620UMASS B-ball NewsMROA::RSCHOTTFri Oct 20 1995 11:3256
         The following bits and pieces have filtered in over the UMass
    Grapevine over the past couple of weeks, regarding the men's B-ball 
    team:
    
    - Despite a special diet and hours in the weight room, Marcus Camby
      only gained 5 pounds over the summer.  Not good news for a team now
      without Lou Roe's inside toughness, and also not good news for
      Camby's immediate NBA prospects.  He's now listed at 225 lbs.
      (probably accurate if a cinder block is with him on the scale!)
    
    - Tyrone Weeks had surgery on one of his feet early in the summer.
      So far in practice he's limited to spending time on the stationary
      bicycles, and may not be ready to play until mid December.
    
    - Both Donta Bright (ankle) and Charlton Clarke (hamstring?) are banged
      up, and participated sparingly in Midnight Madness last Saturday
      night.
    
    - The word on soph Inus Norville and Prop 48 freshman Lari Ketner is
      more encouraging.  After a promising start last year, Norville tailed
      off a bit and lost playing time to Tyrone Weeks.  Word is that he was
      never 100% healthy after mid-January (I have no idea what his problem
      was) and that he's feeling great, and playing great so far in
      captain's practices.  Norville picked up some good experience playing
      in last summer's Olympic Festival.  Observers have compared his game
      to that played by former UM'ie Harper Williams.  UMass fans should be
      so lucky!
    
      Ketner will sit out the year as a non-qualifier.  However those who
      have watched him play pickup games at Boyden Gym marvel at his size 
      (he's a legitimate 6'10", 250 lb'er!), his quickness and his athleticism.
      
    - One of Calipari's main recruiting targets this winter is 6'7", 220
      lb. small forward Ruben Patterson, by way of Cleveland, Ohio, and
      Independence JC in Kansas.  Patterson was one of the stars of the Olympic
      Festival this summer, playing on the East Team coached by John
      Calipari, and is listed as one of the top five players in junior
      college, by most of the recruiting services.  Reportedly, Patterson
      has narrowed his choice of college's to the University of Cincinnati 
      and UMass.  Calipari typically doesn't pursue JC's, however with the
      graduation of Donta Bright and Dana Dingle, and the expected
      departure of Marcus Camby, next year's UMass team will need immediate
      scoring ability at the small forward position, and Patterson should
      be able to provide that.
    
    - Calipari and company have added 6'3" 2G walkon, Ross Burns from
      Greenfield, Ma. to the roster (probably for practice fodder!)  Burns
      played on the Greenfield team that was Western Mass. champs a few
      years back, and then last year played on the Cushing (Westminster,
      Ma.) Academy team that won the New England (small schools?) Prep
      Championship.  Burns was the MVP of the New England Prep Tourney.
    
    That's it for now.
    
    Russ 
                                                                
77.1621Calipari, get out of Camby's wayAKOCOA::BREENFri Oct 20 1995 13:108
    San Francisco - October 20, 1955
    
    	Despite all efforts to put weight on him, the Dons sensational
    center Bill Russell remains 220 pounds.  Although he had mild success
    leading San Francisco to the 1955 NCAA title and occasionally will
    block a short or two it is feared he will not be able to stand the
    pounding from NBA centers and perhaps should continue his track career
    instead.
77.1622CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearFri Oct 20 1995 13:1616
>    San Francisco - October 20, 1955
>    
>    	Despite all efforts to put weight on him, the Dons sensational
>    center Bill Russell remains 220 pounds.  Although he had mild success
>    leading San Francisco to the 1955 NCAA title and occasionally will
>    block a short or two it is feared he will not be able to stand the
>    pounding from NBA centers and perhaps should continue his track career
>    instead.


Now, if that don't beat all.


That ranks right up there with the Jets taking Kenny O'Brien instead of
Dan Marino.

77.1623IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Fri Oct 20 1995 13:303
>    San Francisco - October 20, 1955

Did you save the newspaper from your 50th birthday?  :-)
77.1624Let the kid playAKOCOA::BREENFri Oct 20 1995 13:376
    I do hope it was apparent that it was a made up headline.  I've had it
    with Calipari trying to hide Camby's talents to keep him in college while
    lesser talents, including Joe Smith grab the money.
    
    I'd hate to see a talent like Camby's wasted by one of these self
    aggrandizing, me-first,me-only types like Calipari.
77.1625MROA::RSCHOTTFri Oct 20 1995 13:5116
         Unlike Bill Russell who didn't lay down when up against the likes
    of Wilt Chamberlain, Walt Bellamy and Nate Thurmond (ie. bigger or more
    physical centers), Marcus Camby has had a history of disappearing when 
    in against the 250+ lb'ers, guys like Big Country Reeves (OSU), Yinka Dare
    (GWU), Alexander Koul (GWU) and William Cunningham (Temple) and the 
    Celtic's own Eric Montross.  Camby's best games have actually come when 
    in against athletic centers such as Maryland's Joe Smith and Duquesne's 
    (and the 76'ers) Derrick Alston.
    
         With Tyrone Weeks doubtful, and with Camby's dislike for physical
    play, the matchup with BC on December 9th should be very interesting. 
    I can see Abrams and Curly doing some serious damage inside versus this
    year's version of the Minutemen.
    
    Russ
                          
77.1626ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 20 1995 15:022
77.1627MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceFri Oct 20 1995 15:034
    
    >> Camby = stiff.
    
       I'm not sure if this has personal connotations or not.
77.1628If refs let him playAKOCOA::BREENFri Oct 20 1995 15:0910
    The problem is Calipari is keeping Camby on a tight rein because he's
    such an impact player that he's desperate to keep him out of foul
    trouble.  When Camby shakes of the shackles he is awesome and will
    devestate any team.
    
    Cal has to let this kid play his way and let the fouls fall as they
    may.  And when he's getting stiffed as he was in the Okla st. game with
    big Country (and Camby barely ever guarded him) Cal has to go out there
    and take the T or even two Ts and make it a public spectacle.  Instead 
    Cal tells Camby "don't be aggressive until last 10 minutes".
77.1629IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Fri Oct 20 1995 15:373
>And when he's getting stiffed as he was in the Okla st. game

Bill, let it go... :-)
77.1630UMass adds another top local playerTNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasMon Nov 06 1995 13:3513
    Another huge freshman signing for UMass.  Today they announced that 6-6
    F Mike Babul from Attleboro MA, will attend UMas in the fall.  Mike,
    the more talented of the Babul twins, started on last June's Boston
    Shootout Championship team and chose UMass over North Carolina.  He
    averaged 22.3 ppg and 12 rpg last season and is considered on of the
    Top 50 High School prospects in the country.
    
    Adding Babul to South Boston G Monty Mack gives the Minutemen the top
    two high school players in eastern Mass.  Add SG/SF Winston Smith from
    NJ and UMass already has had an exceptional recruiting year, and they
    still have three scholarships to offer.
    
    NAZZ
77.1631Impressions after the first gameWRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatWed Nov 08 1995 14:5530
Just thought  I'd  give  a  few thoughts about last night's UMass exhibition
game  (against this year's International whipping boys, err team, The Moscow
Dinamo):

With Edgar  Padilla  and  Carmelo  Travieso  manning the point guard duties,
UMass   could  be  in  for  a  LONG  season.   Padilla  had  a  particularly
unspectacular  night,  committing several unforced turnovers and not looking
very  comfortable  running  the  offense.  I haven't seen any stats from the
game  but  it's  possible he might have had more turnovers than points (7, I
think).  New recruit Charlton Clarke was out with a knee injury so I have no
idea whether he would be a better alternative at the point (though from what
I read, he's more of an off-guard).

Marcus Camby  had  a very quiet 24 point, 10 rebound game.  I think this was
partly  due  to the fact that the offense (read: point guard) wasn't getting
him  the  ball in situations where he could do something.  A large number of
his points came from running the floor (which is still his chief asset).  It
appears  to me that Calipari will be leaving Camby on the floor a lot longer
than  in  years past.  Camby didn't come out of the game until the 12 minute
mark  of  the  first half (and that was because he asked out).  This team is
only  going  to  go  as  far  as  Camby  can take them.  p.s.  Don't believe
anything  you  read  about him putting on any weight in the off-season, he's
still the same string bean.

Tyrone Weeks  has  lost  alot  of  weight  (and looked like he's moving alot
better  than  last year).  Donta Dingle/Dana Bright scored/rebounded exactly
like last year; nothing lost, nothing gained.

Chris
77.1632Backcourt a problemMROA::RSCHOTTWed Nov 08 1995 15:3624
         I have said this privately to folks who have asked me, and I'll
    say it now publicly.  Of the players whose eligibility ran out last
    year (Lou Roe, Derek Kellogg, Mike Williams, Jeff Meyer), the player
    UMass will miss most is Derek Kellogg.
    
         While greatly unspectacular, Kellogg distributed the ball properly
    (ie. got the ball down on the blocks to Roe, Camby and Bright), rarely
    turned the ball over, could beat nearly every press UMass faced, played
    decent defense and was just a tough kid!  Despite all of that, he was 
    roundly criticized throughout his career for not being able to penetrate, 
    and for being a poor shooter from outside.  As I watched him down the 
    stetch last season, I often thought he was the right guy for Calipari's 
    system, and that there weren't a heck of a lot of collegiate point guards 
    that I would trade him for (well, a few obvious ones, but not all that
    many!)
    
         Padilla was a point guard coming out of high school, but has
    played mainly 2G at UMass.  Travieso is definitely a 2G.  It remains to
    be seen whether Charlton Clarke can handle the point.  In any event,
    it's scary to think about having to face Kentucky's press in three
    weeks, with a shakey backcourt.
    
    Russ
         
77.1633PG Status A KillerLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Nov 09 1995 12:2113
      Its too bad about the PG position because I think UMass could
      have been a legitemate contender with a solid one.  This position
      is so soft that its really going to hurt bad in a lot of different
      ways.
    
      Whats the story with Burks?  Did he really transfer to a jr. college?
    
      My hope was that the combination of Weeks/Norville could play to a
      level slightly below one Lou Roe.  That small forward and center had
      to be significantly better as well as 2-guard.  BUT, PG is such a
      dramatic drop-off and is so crucial that it almost seems overwhelming.
    
    							Tony
77.1634WRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatThu Nov 09 1995 12:3913
RE: -1

> Whats the story with Burks?  Did he really transfer to a jr. college?

Burks transferred to McNeese State.

Just another comment regarding the play of Padilla: One of Calipari's post
game comments was "If we keep playing like we did tonight and Edgar
keeps throwing the ball in the stands, we will be in the bottom three in our
league."


Chris
77.1635I wonder what the Dons coach was saying in Nov,1955AKOCOA::BREENThu Nov 09 1995 13:5611
    RE: -1 
    
    	Har,har - I needed a good, hearty, belly shaking laugh after a
    difficult system morning.  You UMass guys are priceless.
    
    	I remember a Boston Glove Headline: LEAHY FEARS IDAHO the day
    before one of his BC juggernauts trounced the Boise boys 70-0.
    
    	As long as Camby is healthy and Cal lets him loose and he stays
    away from that ref who screwed him in the Okla st. game then UMass is
    final four bound.
77.1636News flash ... Breen likes CambyMROA::RSCHOTTThu Nov 09 1995 14:456
    Bill,
    
         Are you angling to be ol'Marcus's agent?  Inquiring minds want to
    know.
    
    Russ
77.1637SALEM::BALL_KThu Nov 09 1995 14:4913
    Re: Last 5 or 6
    
    One preseason game isn't enough to start panicing or making end of
    season predictions
    
    Give Padilla a little time to get (re) acclaimated to the PG position,
    
    I guess I am one of those who wasn't impressed with much about
    Kellogg other than his work ethic and I gotta believe Padilla has all
    the tools be at least as good, Although it might take part of the
    season to get there. 
    
                                           K.B.    
77.1638MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 09 1995 15:0311
    
       I liked Kellog but never thought he could be point guard on
      a national champion. Besides his lack of foot speed and the fact
      that he wasn't a very good penetrator, he used to drive me nut be-
      cause he was so damned gun shy. He'd go a whole game and take two 
      shots in the course of it. Other teams picked up on it and wouldn't
      bother defening him. Padilla has far more upside potential than 
      Kellog ever did. He's quick, he has the long range jay and he's
      a ballhawk. If he can reduce the number of times per game that he
      goes into brain lock and commits the idiotic foul or turnover, he 
      could be a big asset. 
77.1639Just let the kid looseAKOCOA::BREENThu Nov 09 1995 15:0410
    Russ as you know I absolutely love Camby and would have taken him over
    any of those guys (Smith,Stackhouse) who went early last year and over
    Duncan.  He doesn't need any more weight he has to stay quick.
    
    The five foul rule is tough in college and should be changed to six; it
    gives absolutely too much leverage to a ref when a Camby is involved as
    we saw in quarterfinal last year.
    
    I find it hard to believe Coach Cal doesn't have some bodies to dribble
    the ball and do some mild harassing on defense.
77.1640Agree With Tommy On KellogLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Nov 09 1995 15:3630
      I agree 100% with Brydie about Kellog.  I felt also that he was
      too gun-shy and lacked enough of his own offensive potential to
      force teams to consider him any kind of a scoring threat.  I think
      most potential NCAA champions have a point guard who is very quick,
      can penetrate, and can stick medium range jumpers with some
      regularity.
    
      All of this Kellog didn't really do.  And yet he was an extremely
      important member of the team, but very much so because of the lack
      of point guard talent behind him.
    
      Kellog was extremely safe, a decent passer, not very mistake-prone,
      a good defender, and could play several minutes.  But, I don't think
      when any team drew up their defenses, they were at all concerned
      with his offensive output.  I think he did play the best game against 
      Oklahoma State though.  
    
      This UMass team with Camby reminds me of Georgetown's situation with
      their twin towers Mtembo and Mourning.  They asked Aurbach to check
      the team out and he watched them practise.   He said their problem
      was point guard.  He said no one could pass the ball adequately to
      either tower.  Passes weren't crisp enough.  They just lacked passing
      ability.
    
      Its just one of those things.  At PG, UMass is going to be too
      ordinary to be able to contend - no matter how good Camby is.
    
      I'd love to be proven wrong, but objectively, I can't see it.
    
    						Tony
77.1641USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Nov 10 1995 12:0719
>Just another comment regarding the play of Padilla: One of Calipari's post
>game comments was "If we keep playing like we did tonight and Edgar
>keeps throwing the ball in the stands, we will be in the bottom three in our
>league."

Calipari trying to make an A-10 championship look good.  He knows more is
*expected*, yet he also knows that's all this team will accomplish this
year.


re:  Breen's comments on Camby

Better than Joe Smith ????  You've got to be kidding me !  This kid has
yet to show ANY PIECE of the offensive firepower that Smith has.  He's
also yet to win games in the closing seconds against rivals in a conference
light years ahead of the A-10.

Please Bill, it's OK to say he's got great potential, but that's all he
has at this point.
77.1642Ever hear of defense?AKOCOA::BREENFri Nov 10 1995 13:0714
    Joe you and a bunch of others have to get out of this stats mania that
    you get from your rotis and fantasy leagues.
    
    It was UMass in the final 8 not Maryland last year and what did UMass
    have other than Camby.  I can only tell you what I see and I see a guy
    who so dominates a game defensively that his coach keeps him out of the
    offense to stay away from foul trouble (and of course as you know by
    now even when Camby is doing nothing he gets assigned tactical fouls
    just by the political wheeling and dealing of ncaa basketball
    business).
    
    There isn't a player in ncaa basketball that will be the total focus of
    everyteams strategy like Camby of UMass.  And if the right nba coach
    gets him he'll dominate in the nba too.
77.1643???STRATA::BARBIERIFri Nov 10 1995 13:303
      To say, at this point, that Camby is better than Joe Smith
      is unusual as in you are in quite a minority.  UMass had 
      a lot more than Camby last year.
77.1644IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Fri Nov 10 1995 13:4621
>    Joe you and a bunch of others have to get out of this stats mania that
>    you get from your rotis and fantasy leagues.

Bill, stop embarrassing yourself...

Camby isn't in Joe Smith's league yet.  No one is saying that he won't/can't be,
just that he's not better right now.

Camby may be a better defender, I don't know.  (Don't get caught up in your
own "stats mania" about blocked shots...)  But Smith isn't a sieve, and his
offensive talent is far above that of Camby's.  And while we're talking about
supporting casts, go ahead and name one of last year's Maryland starters other
than Smith.

And the "anti-Camby NCAA" stuff used to be amusing, but is now bordering on
dreary.  Go ahead and make a movie about it with Oliver Stone.

Camby staying in school was a good move - Bill, you were right in saying that
he has to stay quick, but he also has to build up his strength for the NBA -
not necessarily bulking up, but developing the requisite stamina to take the
night after night pounding by the big boys...
77.1645Camby can't compete underneath with big peopleTNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasFri Nov 10 1995 14:1112
    Joe Smith is better than Marcus Camby for two reasons:  he is much
    stronger, and he can play both inside and outside on offense.  Camby
    has a nice jumper, runs the floor as well as anybody, and excels on
    defense.  But he can't bang inside, which makes him ineffective against
    strong inside post players.  I think you'll see Weeks and Norville do
    the bulk of the work inside while Camby roams the perimeter.
    
    I've compared him before to Larry Nance, and that's what I think he'll
    be in the pros.  A 6-11 3 man who runs the floor, shoot the jumper, and
    blocks shots.
    
    NAZZ
77.1646Not to say either that Joe Smith wasn't great himselfAKOCOA::BREENFri Nov 10 1995 14:2329
    I never said anything about an anti-Camby thing; in your fear of the
    word conspiracy which I also didn't use you're reading in your own
    ideas.  I said that with a mere 5 fouls a dominating defensive presence
    like Camby is extremely vulnerable and offensive fouls in college
    basketball are easy to draw (speaking of "embarrassing" you should be
    ashamed that I have to explain college basketball arithmetic and basic
    strategy to you).
    
    	I have no evidence that there was a gambling coup or ncaa pressure
    to move Okla st. into final four ahead of UMass last year.  The only
    oddity I pointed out was that Jack Craig in his tv column pointedly
    criticized the color man (Isaiah?) for not dramatically emphasizing the
    drama around Camby picking up fouls 2,3 and 4 thus totally neutralizing
    him for much of the second half only to find the next day that the
    whole world missed this "drama" including the esteemed Ted Sarandia (so
    don't feel bad Roland that you completely missed it too).
    
    	Since at half time Camby and Coach Cal had succeeded in
    successfully accomplishing the game plan of staying even (they were
    ahead) without having to expend fouls I and at least Jack Craig were
    totally focused on whether Camby could stay out of foul trouble.  Then
    he picked up a succession of cheapies and it's the job of journalists
    to question (or at least be aware of it) when officials so flagrantly
    effect the outcome of a game.
    
    	So since we're offering advice around, mine is to put down the
    voluminous basketball digests and all the canned opinions and actually
    watch the games and perhaps pick up a C book to peruse during
    commercials.
77.1647IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Fri Nov 10 1995 14:3223
>    	So since we're offering advice around, mine is to put down the
>    voluminous basketball digests and all the canned opinions and actually
>    watch the games and perhaps pick up a C book to peruse during
>    commercials.

OK, buddy, the "watch the games" suggestion was fine, but "pick up a C book"
means the gloves are off... :-)

1) I don't read basketball digests.
2) I don't repeat canned opinions - I think most basketball columnists 
     (Jackie MacMullan excepted) are blowhards who think they're in line to
     win a Pulitzer.  And since they're all blowhards, I'm sure they kowtow
     to Jack Craig, who I consider the king blowhard...
3) I would be willing to bet that I watch a lot more college basketball games
     than you - I'm just not hooked on UMass.  What the hell else am I going
     to do at 2:00 am when I'm feeding a hungry baby?  I watch Big 10 and Big
     East on ESPN and the networks, A10 on SportsChannel when their games (and
     myself) are available, and whatever else I can get.

Back when ESPN had the first two rounds of the NCAA and was doing it right,
first-round Friday was always a vacation day.

BTW - I didn't even watch UMass/Okla St.  I knew who was going to win...
77.1648Xree Hipp ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Nov 10 1995 14:551
    
77.1649IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Fri Nov 10 1995 15:133
Admit it, the only reason he was worth remembering was the name... :-)

And I'm not even sure he was starting at year's end...
77.1650MiscLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Nov 10 1995 15:2213
      Did Maryland have Booth or was that Virginia?
    
      Actually, if Camby got those 3 fouls real fast, it sure was
      a drag!!
    
      To me, to know State was going to win necessitated knowing Roe
      could only play on one leg.  I think its unfair to Roe to assume
      he was that insignificant.
    
      It was a close game until midway through the 2nd half.  If Roe
      was healthy...well he was a fine college player.
                                                 
    						Tony
77.1651IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Fri Nov 10 1995 15:233
The assumption wasn't a slam at Roe at all.  I thought Camby would get in 
all sorts of foul trouble against Big Country, and even if he didn't, he'd
get worn down...
77.1652CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Nov 10 1995 17:045
    
    hahaha got me Roland....but Tony's right they also had Keith Booth and
    isn't Booth Donta Bright's cousin?
    
    ;^)
77.1653USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Nov 10 1995 17:176
The tragedy of Camby's foul trouble against Okla St wasn't that the
refs didn't leave im alone (remember, this isn't the NBA, they call
'em like they see 'em), but that Calipari was stupid enough to have
him in there.  Given the once-and-done-format, the score at the time,
and the time left in the game, it was a no brainer that Camby should
have been saved once he picked up #3.
77.1654IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Fri Nov 10 1995 17:175
>    hahaha got me Roland....but Tony's right they also had Keith Booth and
>    isn't Booth Donta Bright's cousin?

Since he doesn't play for UMass, Bill Breen thinks he's related to John 
Wilkes Booth... :-)
77.165570s were my big college basketball daysAKOCOA::BREENFri Nov 10 1995 17:3715
    Well you certainly qualify and I used to watch that much but not any
    more but UMass has become a big intersectional player and has had some
    great games, some of which I've missed including the great ncaa
    Maryland game when Joe Smith and Camby came of age.
    
    Having not seen the OK st. game and only hearing accounts you might
    have thought Camby picked up the fouls guarding Big C.  He didn't guard
    him much and the fouls were petty especially no. 4 he picked up going
    for a tip.  So in the second half he picked up 2 and 3 by 16:00 then
    out until 12:00, pick up #4 out at 11:00 and back at 04:00 and too
    late.  He played about 8 minutes top in 2nd half.
    
    What I would really have liked to have known was if it was the same ref
    for those 3 key second half fouls.  And even I now say it's truly time
    to drop it.
77.1656IMBETR::DUPREZIt's pancake time!Fri Nov 10 1995 17:454
>    And even I now say it's truly time
>    to drop it.

Film at 11!!!
77.1657Still...Wirtz Is WorstLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Nov 10 1995 18:2011
      re: .1655
    
      I'll tell you what I still think about was that Lenny Wirtz call
      on Calipari for going out of the box.
    
      O-U-C-H-!
    
      Man, that hurt.  What an absolute travesty of any kind of justice
      that was!
    
    							Tony
77.1658Camby...STRATA::BARBIERIWed Nov 15 1995 20:161
      Camby conversations in Topic 14...
77.1659Chris Kirkland signs onMROA::RSCHOTTThu Nov 16 1995 11:2827
         The UMass Men's Basketball Program announced its fourth signing of 
    the early signing period, with the news that 6'6" 195 lb. small forward 
    Chris Kirkland of Pittsburg would be joining the Minutemen next fall.
    Kirkland averaged 20 pts. and 14 reb. for McKees Rocks H.S. last
    winter.  The following is what the Prepstars Recruiting Handbook says about
    Kirkland:
    
          "Quick leaper is a rangy athlete noted for acrobatic stickbacks
           and rejects.  His J is smooth and effective at times to 20',
           but at other times it flattens out considerably.  Has sure hands
           and is a good interior passer.  Also uses his athleticism well
           on defense to get steals.  Careless at times, but he has high
           major to big-time ability.
    
    With a 40" vertical leap to his credit, Kirkland sounds a bit like a 
    skinny, William Herndon.  Though Kirkland is not ranked as highly as
    UMass' previous recruits, he is thought to be the best athlete of the
    bunch.
    
         I'm a bit surprised that Calipari has brought in three small
    forwards in this recruiting class.  In all liklihood either Mike Babul
    or Winston Smith will be moved to 2G, but that creates a bit of a
    logjam there as well, with both Carmelo Travieso and Charlton Clarke
    back in '96.
    
    Russ
        
77.1660SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Thu Nov 16 1995 12:226
    
    	When you recruit your not recruiting for next year. He might
    have a logjam in '96 at SF and 2G. It lets the new guys get
    experience before they start in '97.
    
    Ron
77.1661UMass/KentuckySTRATA::BARBIERIMon Nov 20 1995 20:472
      I would expect the UMass/Kentucky game will be televised.  Does
      anyone know the time and channel?
77.1662ESPN at 9 p.m.MROA::RSCHOTTTue Nov 21 1995 11:405
         The UMass-Kentucky game will be televised on ESPN, starting at
    9 p.m., a week from tonite.  Judging by both team's play during the
    "exhibition" season, the UM'ies could be in for a long evening.
    
    Russ
77.1663Shouldn't get any betterAKOCOA::BREENTue Nov 21 1995 13:455
    Where's that game being played Russ?, Meadowlands?  I like Umass to be
    competitive unless Camby gets into foul trouble again.  Watch out for
    that Antoine Walker he's ready to sail.
    
    Definitely one to watch.
77.1664MROA::RSCHOTTTue Nov 21 1995 13:5410
    Bill:
    
         The Great 8 is played at the Auburn Hills Arena (Detroit, I
    believe).
    
         Against Kentucky, its not Camby I worry about.  Its whether
    the guards can survive Kentucky's pressure, and whether the defense
    can keep Kentucky from scoring 100 pts.
    
    Russ
77.1665Another #1 goes down...PCBUOA::MORGANWed Nov 29 1995 11:1820
    UMASS celebrated the appointment of Willaim Bulger :-) last night by
    beating Rick "Chihuahua" Pitino's #1 ranked Kentucky team, by a score of
    92-82.  Tenacious defense and a huge game from Marcus Camby won this
    one.  Edgar Padilla and Carmello Travieso didn't take a blow until
    there were seconds left on the clock and the game was decided.  These
    two certainly didn't shoot lights out, but to play as well as they did
    against a very impressive Kentucky press, was a pleasant surprise to
    see.
    
    I recall UMASS only going with a 7 man rotation, with Norville and Ty Weeks
    seeing only a handful of minutes each.  There was one stretch where
    Weeks picked up 4 fouls in about 1 minute.  At that point I thought it
    was all over.  Donta Bright and Dana Dingle pissed me off several times
    with careless passes against the press, but they both came up big when
    they had to.  Calipari did a good job of getting Camby rest when he
    could and UMASS was definitely helped by all the TV timeouts.
    
    You gotta love watching Carmello Travieso play D!!! 
    
    					Steve
77.1666Another one bites the dust!MROA::RSCHOTTWed Nov 29 1995 11:293
    
    
    UNBELIEVABLE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
77.1667SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Wed Nov 29 1995 11:5213
    
    	Umass exploited Kentuckys biggest weakness. Kentucky has great
    perimeter players and forwards. With a weakness in the middle. They were
    over matched in the middle against Camby. Camby was great reading the
    double teams sent at him. Then either shot over it, or passed. Looks
    like Marcus is also taking over a leadership role. Marcus wanted that
    win last night. Looks like another year of school. Will help Marcus in
    the maturity process.
    
    Ron
    
    	On the Bulger issue, just think his salary just went from 82K to
    189K                                         
77.1668BIGQ::MCKAYWed Nov 29 1995 12:199
    Well since I'm the only one without the rose colored glasses on....
    Kentucky lost this game because they played poorly, not because
    UMASS dominated.  Camby played well but still doesn't show any
    range beyond 6 feet.  I thought Bright's game also improved a notch
    over last year.  It's going to be a tough road for UMASS to even win
    the A-10 with no depth at all and only two people who can score.
    
    Jimbo
                                                                    
77.1669IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Wed Nov 29 1995 12:513
UMass did a good job, but I was *not* impressed by Dana Dingle.

And Rick Pitino's team lost, which never hurts...
77.1670USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Nov 29 1995 13:425
Kentucky also proved that they don't have a PG.

Good win for UMass, no matter what angle you take on it.  "Snake-oil" man
won't be able to Lou_Holtz his team's chances for the rest of the year.
And anything but a Final Four appearance should be considered a failure.
77.1671Third year in a row UMass knocks off #1TNPUBS::NAZZAROBarros &gt; DouglasWed Nov 29 1995 14:1415
    The entire starting five played tremendous, continual defense for a
    full 40 minutes.  And unlike some UMass teams of the past, these guys
    made their free throws (31-37!!!).
    
    However, they are going to need much bigger contributions from Weeks
    and Norville if they are to be a serious national title contender, and
    the injury to CHarlton Clarke cannot be a serious one.  There is no way
    you can play with only two guards.
    
    Still, for the first game of the season, it was a spectacular victory.
    It's always nice to see Calipari's teams play the toughest possible
    schedule every year, unlike some other local teams that desperately
    need to chalk up some Ws against non-scholarship foes.
    
    NAZZ
77.1672Obviously I can't say enough about my main manAKOCOA::BREENWed Nov 29 1995 15:1430
    Well I got to watch a tremendous basketball game and obviously for one
    game the premier player in America in Marcus Camby - Duncan gets his
    chance tonight to make his claim.
    
    Camby stopped Ky's inside game cold with 4 blocks in first 10 minutes
    but tremendous outside shooting by Delk et co was almost too much.
    UMass has to be given credit for surviving the 10 man attack (Turner
    for those not viewing looked great) but they make a lot of stupid
    decisions but since it's November that should get better.
    
    Camby does everything including hitting every one of his free throws
    and totally dispelling the critics of his outside shooting showing
    excellent touch from 8-12 feet.  For some reason coach Cal doesn't
    emphasize (too his guards) Camby's low post game which Kentucky,
    despite using 2-4 players to stop, was helpless against.  I'd guess
    that if Camby got 10 touches down low he converted 8.
    
    Camby even picked up on the boards as the game progressed but that and
    fundementals of defense and rebounds would be his question marks but as
    I've said, with only 5 fouls in college basketball and a presence which
    defines a number 1 team vs a number 20 team, Camby has to temper his
    aggressiveness.  His upside potential under professional tutoring is
    tremendous - I personally would trade any player in the nba for his
    draft rights a la the famous Auerbach gamble for Russell.  
    
    It's been decades since one player so dominated on the college
    basketball scene.  Truly in my 40 years of watching I can only think of
    Russell and even he didn't have the offensive touch of Camby.
    
    Billte
77.1673BIGQ::MCKAYWed Nov 29 1995 15:288
    Since when is making an 8 foot shot an outside touch?  Camby has
    shown that he can hit the six footer, can dunk, is a great weakside
    shot blocker, can run very well, has improved at the charity stripe,
    can not hit an outside shot, and can not guard a big physical center.
    Upside certainly outweighs the downside but he's far from someone
    who can do it all.....
    
    Jimbo
77.1674IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Wed Nov 29 1995 15:285
>    It's been decades since one player so dominated on the college
>    basketball scene.  Truly in my 40 years of watching I can only think of
>    Russell and even he didn't have the offensive touch of Camby.

Whatever you're smoking, I want some!
77.1675What is Clarke's Injury?GLRMAI::WILKESWed Nov 29 1995 15:455
    Does anyone know what Charlton Clarke's injury is?
    
    Didn't the dear departed Andre Burks get injured in the opening game
    last year against Arkansas. Perhaps Calipari should keep key freshman
    guard recruits out of opening games.
77.1676MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 29 1995 15:5010
    
       Whoah, there, Bill! Camby had a great game but it was still
      just one game and against a team that couldn't throw anything
      at him. I'd like to see if Marcus has learned how to deal with
      the widebodies leaning on him for 40 minutes. Still, nice win
      for UMass though they did get a little too full of themselves
      when they were up 19 in the first half. Too many turnovers off
      the trap, too but if they can get Padilla to bring down his 
      turnover numbers and be just a tad more selective with his J
      this could be a better tema than last year's. 
77.1677CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Nov 29 1995 15:5314
    
    But the reality of the situation is that if Camby can play night in and
    night out like last night he could dominate the scene due to a lack of
    competition. While guys like Kittles, Allen, Iverson, Minor, Geary etc.
    are fine ballplayers none has the total package. Jordan couldn't
    dominate the scene because of Dean and all the other fine players at
    that time, Ewing, Akeem, Ralph etc. Grant Hill as complete a player
    as I've seen on the college scene in my time still had to deal with
    guys of impressive talent during his era. Bird had Magic etc etc. 
    Duncan is the only big man out there that could steal Camby's thunder
    and he's got to prove it now that Childress is gone and he's in the
    spotlight.....
    
    mike
77.1678AKOCOA::BREENWed Nov 29 1995 16:2710
    foreshadowing, presaging.. I knew this was coming.
    
    Last time it was embarrasing that'd I'd predict Camby to have the kind
    of performance he had last night, taking a team that otherwise would
    lose by 20-30 and beating them.  When are you gonna light up?
    
    Jimbo, Camby's not asked, in fact he's told not to take anything from
    the outside.  None of the pro shooters over 6'11 did much of it in
    college (I'm think of Ewing,Hakeem) because their coach won't let them.
    But those post shots are 8-12 not 6 footers.
77.1679MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Nov 29 1995 16:344
    
      Jimbo's just jealous that perhaps the best player to come
     of the Nutmeg state since the great Calvin Murphy chose Am-
     herst over Storrs. Get over it, Jimbo.
77.1680MROA::RSCHOTTWed Nov 29 1995 16:4211
    Re: .1672
    
         UMass Fan's beware.  Ol'Bill Breen is just setting us up for a
    hard fall when Mickey Curley takes Marcus to school in the Fleet Center
    on December 9th.
    
         Nazz has always warned me, "Be wary of Double Eagles bearing lavish
    praise!"  Hey wait a minute.  Isn't new UMass Prez. William Bulger a
    Double Eagle?
    
    Russ                           
77.1681IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Wed Nov 29 1995 16:4911
>    Last time it was embarrasing that'd I'd predict Camby to have the kind
>    of performance he had last night, taking a team that otherwise would
>    lose by 20-30 and beating them.  When are you gonna light up?

1) I like Marcus Camby as a player, just not as much as you
2) He *did* have a great game last night, and I'm sure he'll have several
     others this year.
3) Even given 1 and 2, to compare him to Russell is stretching it quite a bit.
     He's not that dominant.

I'll light up as soon as you get me the stuff... :-)
77.1682CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Nov 29 1995 17:157
>         Nazz has always warned me, "Be wary of Double Eagles bearing lavish
>    praise!"  Hey wait a minute.  Isn't new UMass Prez. William Bulger a
>    Double Eagle?
    
Is he?

That's freezing if he is.....
77.1683BIGQ::MCKAYWed Nov 29 1995 17:3118
    I don't think I've been overly harsh on Camby by any means, in my
    EXPERT 8*) basketball opinion I've highlighted his positives and
    negatives.
    
    Camby would fit in nicely backing up Travis Knight, no denying that!!!
    
    Tommy, I don't care where they come from as long as they can 
    produce.  Losing an in-state player is no worse to me than
    losing anyone they try to recruit.  
    
    Big men who lit it up from outside in college (Cliff Robinson,
    and Vin Baker are two off the top of my head).  As far as 12
    foot shots I did not see a basket farther than 6-8 feet scored by
    Camby besides his free throws.
    
    Jimbo
    
      
77.1684USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Nov 29 1995 18:1111
>3) Even given 1 and 2, to compare him to Russell is stretching it quite a bit.
>     He's not that dominant.

He ain't even Joe Smith, Roland.  Billte is just trying to stir the
fire.  Camby did not dominate in his first 3 years.  Coaching strategy
or the presence of Lou Roe didn't have anything to do with that.
Great players dominate because that's how they play.  Camby defintely
has great NBA POTENTIAL, but that's all it is right now.

And anyone with shoulders no wider than mine won't dominate in the low-post
in the NBA.
77.1685AKOCOA::BREENWed Nov 29 1995 18:2612
    by Double do you mean BC High and College or College and Grad School.
    Bulger is an Eagle as is Ryan and a few other Gloves, Shaughnessy
    obviously is Holy Cross :-)
    
    Calipari was interviewed in the Glove today and basically said he's
    trying to contain Camby and definitely doesn't want him shooting from
    too far outside.  [Doesn't want him to be] "Superman".
    
    BC could catch UMass napping a bit but I doubt it, I'm asking for 20.
    
    I'm surprised the UMass contingent isn't more excited although a let
    down vs Maryland is to be feared.
77.1686Reel Him In Boys!!!LUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Nov 29 1995 18:313
      I kind of thought Bill Walton and Lew Alcindor dominated much
      more than Camby has.  I'm in the classification of wondering
      what is in Bill's pipe too!
77.1687Interesting Resume for a UM'ie PrezMROA::RSCHOTTWed Nov 29 1995 18:387
    Bill:
    
         Today's Globe has a spiffy picture of Whitey's Bro from his days at
    BC High.  I assume he also has either an undergrad degree or his law
    degree from the Heights.  What's the story?
    
    Russ        
77.1689PCBUOA::MORGANWed Nov 29 1995 18:555
    I'd imagine Tyrone Weeks will be spending a lot of time guarding Danya
    Abrams.  Now there's a couple of heavyweights!  Who's Billy B. gonna be
    rooting for?!
    
    					Steve
77.1690depends on the betsCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Nov 29 1995 19:022
    
    whoever Whitey tells him to!!!!!!!
77.1691IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Wed Nov 29 1995 19:077
>      It'll be interesting to see how Marcus handles or
>     doesn't handle Danya Abrams. I'm betting Abrams
>     scores 40.

No, because Camby will have fouls on him so quickly they'll have to put a
wide-body on Abrams (said wide-body will hold him to 34).  Then Bill will blame
the refs again for taking Camby out of his game :-)
77.1692AKOCOA::BREENWed Nov 29 1995 19:2710
    Tony, Walton and Alcindor dominated with outstanding teams.  I'm trying
    to think of big men that dominated and brought their teams from "good"
    to the top.  David Robinson of Navy comes to mind.
    
    Someone mention Glenn Robinson but he's a 6'8 offensive minded forward.
    Baker was somewhat similar to Camby in a small program.
    
    Somewhere between my hyperbole and the various skeptics is the middle
    ground of how much of an impact player Camby is (vs say how purely
    talented a Webber or a Glenn Robinson were)
77.1693Woke the house up twice last night tooAKOCOA::BREENWed Nov 29 1995 19:325
    No Roland, when it comes to that game I'll have my Eagle cap on if I'm
    not actually there.  They threw me out of Roberts once, long,long ago, for
    over vociferous rooting and to be truthful screaming at the refs. 
    Behaviour which would have been considered mild at Syracuse or
    Conneticut or even at a BC hockey game.
77.1694GLRMAI::WILKESWed Nov 29 1995 20:053
    re .1679
    
    Calvin Murphy played for Niagra.
77.1695MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave all...Wed Nov 29 1995 20:589
	Speaking of Navy, I wonder if there's anymore
	"Admiral" Robinsons in the works.  A friend of 
	mine (74 grad of USNA) and I are going to see 
	the Navy - UNH game Saturday.

	I'll let you know.


	billl
77.1696This is Camby's first chance to be "the man"TNPUBS::NAZZAROSo long Sherm!Thu Nov 30 1995 13:2816
    First of all, Camby has not p[layed three previous years at UMass - he
    is a junior.
    
    Secondly, he was never asked to dominate games in his first two years. 
    UMass had deep, talented, and veteran teams when Camby was a freshman
    and a sophomore.  Guys like Lou Roe, Mike Williams (some of the time!)
    and Derek Kellogg were the guys that led the Minutemen.  Now, it's
    Camby's turn, and Tuesday night was the first time he was placed in
    that leadership role.
    
    I'm not very optimistic about the Maryland game, especially without
    Clarke, since there very easily could be an emotional letdown.  The
    real interesting game is next Wednesday, with Camby going up against
    Tim Duncan and Wake Forest.  I'll be there!
    
    NAZZ
77.1697Where?AKOCOA::BREENThu Nov 30 1995 14:118
    Be where?  Is it at UMass?
    
    Exactly.  Camby has been under wraps until now, a factor I have
    mentioned as leading to his being underrated by some.  Btw, watched
    Duncan for 10 minutes last night - has he grown?  Is he a full 7' now?
    
    Game lacked the intensity of UM - Ky and Wake doesn't depend on Duncan
    as much.  Duncan has a nice game I'll still take Camby.
77.1698MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Nov 30 1995 15:1420
       In today's Globe, Bob Ryan has a piece on the big win 
      over Kentucky and the near miracle that Coach Cal has
      worked in Amherst. One image stuck out for me during
      the Kentucky game. It was after the game was sealed 
      and Edgar Padilla came off the floor after playing his 
      heart out. Coach Cal gave Padilla a big hug and a look 
      of genuine affection that you seldom see in big time 
      college basketball. As much as the play of Camby, it
      was a highlight for me. You can question a few things 
      about Cal and his program but you really can't question 
      his commitment to his players. I saw it in his rel-
      ationship with Harper Williams. I saw it in the way he
      dealt with Mike Williams. There was talk during the Ken-
      tucky game about what a hot property Cal was and that 
      the NBA would soon come calling. Coach Cal is not pro 
      material. He just won't get the kind of satisfaction in 
      the NBA when it's largely about money and the feeling of 
      'family' just is not there, imo. Win over Kentucky or not,
      UMass is lucky to have Calipari the person. 
    
77.1699School is right for him and vice versaTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Fri Dec 01 1995 12:1412
    Calipari has a new 10 year contract at UMass, and I would not be
    surprised if he honors it, if Billy Bulger and he can agree to
    co-exist.  I'm not sure what theirdynamic will be, but there is
    the chance that Bulger could be jealous of Calipari's success or view
    his basketball program as an impediment to making UMass the kind of
    school Bulger envisions.
    
    I do know that Calipari is very happy at UMass, his wife likes the
    area, and he realizes what a good situation he has.  We could be
    looking at a long-term, mutually beneficial situation.
    
    NAZZ
77.1700Clarke gone 4 weeks!MROA::RSCHOTTFri Dec 01 1995 12:2012
         The Herald and Nazz report that Charlton Clarke is out for at
    least one month with a broken bone in his foot.  While most teams won't
    be able to throw the constant pressure "D" against the guards that
    Kentucky did (actually Maryland will be one of those that can), it
    would seem to me that a winning strategy for any opposing coach, would
    be to substitute often in the backcourt, apply the pressure, make the
    UMass guards work hard, and hope for fatique and fouls to set in.
    
         It won't be an easy month of December with a killer schedule and
    two guards.
    
    Russ
77.1701Filling The Void?STRATA::BARBIERIFri Dec 01 1995 13:446
      Excellent reply Tommy!  I really appreciated it!
    
      Can Traveiso play any PG?  If so, can Bright or Dingle play
      any shooting guard?
    
    						Tony
77.1702ball handling ok; shooting?AKOCOA::BREENFri Dec 01 1995 14:4312
    One of the big roles Cal asked of his guards last year was shooting
    from 3 pt range because A10 teams took their cue from Chaney and packed
    the middle to seal off Roe and Camby.  Kentucky pressed the entire game
    leading to a large proportion of transistion baskets but not many wide
    open 3 pt attemtps.  In the second half I didn't think UMass's outside
    shooting was very hot but Pitino wasn't hardly going to any packed
    zone.
    
    	I would guess fatigue contributed to shooting problems on both
    teams.  It appears that Bright and Dingle both handle the ball well but
    their range is under 3 pt range.  Kentucky's Delk made the 3 pt line
    look like the foul line.
77.1703not a UMass follower, so....USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Dec 04 1995 17:516
>      his commitment to his players.
>      I saw it in the way he
>      dealt with Mike Williams.

What was it about his throwing Williams off the team that showed a
commitment to his players ?
77.1704UMass moves to #3 in the countryTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Mon Dec 04 1995 18:0912
    Tremendous weekend for the Minutemen, defeating #19 Maryland in their
    own backyard before routing Florida in the championship game of the
    Franklin Bank Classic.  Marcus Camby was the MVP of the tournament, to
    nobody's surprise, but the other four starters each played fabulous.
    The UMass defensive intensity in the second half against Maryland was
    terrific.
    
    I'm just pissed that no local TV station picked up the final game
    against Florida.  Can't imagine that happening if it were BC in the
    same situation.
    
    NAZZ
77.1705Good game (from what I saw)ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsMon Dec 04 1995 18:1610
    Didn't catch the end of the game on Saturday (washer went up in smoke -
    burned out a belt), but apparently the Terps went cold (2 points in 11
    minutes?) and it cost them the game.  Good showing though against a top
    flight team in the post Smith era.
    
    Nice to see teams with challenging pre-conference opponents instead of
    pulling typical Georgetown "Little Sisters of the Poor" scheduling
    tricks to get to that all impressive 12-0 record.
    
    UMDan 
77.1706Waiting for Vitale to make Russell comparisonAKOCOA::BREENMon Dec 04 1995 18:2314
    I missed most of the first half but caught the 3 fouls on Camby.  I
    noticed that Weeks and co were dominating the boards so I was confident
    that UMass could pull it out.
    
    Unlike Okla st. Camby stayed out of foul trouble in the second half. 
    Vitale himself admitted there was one contact that could have been a
    foul but it wasn't called and I think Camby had none in the second
    half.
    	I must say that even as a Camby fan, Vitale is a bit overbearing on
    his gushing over Marcus.  Who is the play by play man, he tries
    valiantly to keep Vitale on planet earth.
    
    	Where is the Wake Forest game, at Mullins?  I'd like to see what
    it'd draw at Fleet.
77.1707MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 04 1995 18:4017

  >> What was it about his throwing Williams off the team that showed a
  >> commitment to his players ?

     Mike Williams was just about the only UMass player last year who
     could score from anywhere on the floor and who could take anyone
     one on one. His clutch shooting was absolutely phenomenal.  He had
     something like 6 career last second game winning or tying baskets.
     But when Mike started messing up Coach Cal tried to straighten him 
     out. He stuck by him even when he had legal problems. But when 
     it became clear that Williams wasn't showing Coach Cal and his 
     teammates the kind of respect that he himself was being given
     and that they deserved, Coach Cal made the tough choice of kicking
     him off the team. A team with a shot at the national title, I
     might add. 
    
77.1708MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 04 1995 18:413
    
      Pretty impressive that UMass could come out so flat and still
     manage to beat a team the calibre of Maryland.
77.1709BIGQ::MCKAYTue Dec 05 1995 10:168
    Maryland is a decent team, I saw about half the game and UMASS
    shot themselves in the foot less than Maryland did.  It was 
    definitely a fugly game.  Camby did do a good job with staying out
    of foul trouble and picking his spots to help out in the lane.
    Him just being in the game changes a teams offense.  Scoring wise
    he was invisible......
    
    Jimbo
77.1710Did you see the game?GLRMAI::WILKESTue Dec 05 1995 16:484
    Camby was not invisble scoring-wise in the second half against
    Maryland.
    
    For instance he scored the winning basket.
77.1711From 12-15 feet if you're measuringAKOCOA::BREENTue Dec 05 1995 18:431
    
77.1712BIGQ::MCKAYTue Dec 05 1995 19:0811
    14 whole points, that's invisible for a superstar.  
    
    and don't give me the did I watch the game BS!
    
    I'll give him a few 10-12 footers in a row in the second half.  He
    was clearly shooting from inside the free throw line.  Maybe his
    range is improving, up from 6-8 last week 8*)
    
    Jimbo
    
    
77.1713SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Tue Dec 05 1995 19:5213
    
    	Camby is taking most of his shots from within 10'. Reason being
    is that's how Coach Cal is playing him in the offense. Do you see
    Shaquille O'Neal taking 15-20' jump shots? NO. Why? Because he
    dominates inside. So Orlando runs there offense around Shaq down low.
    Coach Cal is doing the same thing with Camby. They can't guard him
    down low, so leave him there.
    	I'm not saying Camby is a Shaq. You just design your offense
    around your players best attributes. Look at Georgetown or Villanova
    with Iverson and Kittles. They run a lot of screens so they get a
    good look at the basket.
    
    Ron
77.1714AKOCOA::BREENTue Dec 05 1995 20:166
    but if you watch closely I think you'll see that he's slightly outside
    10' (say 12) and sometimes a little bit more.  Last year he took shots
    from > 15 a bit too much.
    
    Perhaps someone needs to draw or reference a .gif with a court to get
    the dimensions surrounding the key area.
77.1715MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longGronowski = Welcher ExtraordinaireTue Dec 05 1995 20:226
	Best bet is to get ahold of Walt(e) Ashe.  He of the
	words-to-pictures fame.



	billl
77.1716get out the NodosCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineWed Dec 06 1995 11:338
    
    Well tonight we get to see how much improvement Marcus has really made
    as UMass vs. Wake Forest at 9:30 on ESPN. You got to love Cal for
    ducking no one. Two best bigman in the country going head to head,
    the only thing that can make it any sweeter is if Vitale is another
    timezone.
    
    mike
77.1717BIGQ::MCKAYWed Dec 06 1995 11:506
    Mikey he can't afford to duck anyone with the strength of the A-10
    taking up most of his schedule.
    
    Wake in a walk tonight.
    
    Jimbo
77.1718CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Dec 06 1995 12:107
Hey, A-10s are pretty strong. 

When they come in slow and low firing depleted uranium slugs from their
gatling gun, man, it's a pissah....


Oh, oh, I'm sorry.  You guys were talking basketball.....  Sorry 'bout that...
77.1719Gross Points Scored is not the Measure of a Superst*GLRMAI::WILKESWed Dec 06 1995 12:3012
    re. 1712
    
    Scoring output needs to be measured against the style of the game.
    
    14 point out of 50 is 28 % of the total points scored by the team.
    Given the fact Camby was on the bench for about half of the first half
    that is respectable output. No one on Maryland scored in double
    figures.
    
    A truer measure of a Superstar is whether they score the big baskets
    when you need them. Against Kentucky and Maryland Camby has met that
    test.
77.1720BIGQ::MCKAYWed Dec 06 1995 12:588
    Wow, is that a new fantasy stat, Camby leads the nation in scoring
    % of team in ugly up and down game where both teams commit greater
    than 20 turnovers!
    
    Until Camby does it game in and game out he's still Mr. POtential.
    His history shows he disappears, until he changes that.....
    
    Jimbo
77.1721another recruit signs on!MROA::RSCHOTTWed Dec 06 1995 13:2413
         On another subject ...... UMass has received a verbal commitment
    from 6'9", 230 lb. C/PF, Ajmal Basit from St. Anthony's H.S. in Jersey
    City, N.J., coached by Bob Hurley Sr.  Basit selected UMass over Seton
    Hall, Providence and Florida State.  Basit averaged 16 ppg, 13 rpg, and
    3 blocks, for a 30 and 2 team last winter.
    
         Calipari and company have now filled 5 scholarships, with one 
    remaining.  High School'ers/JUCO's remaining on Coach Cal's wish list
    include JUCO Ruben Patterson, NYC PG Kevin Morris, All-World H.S.'er
    Tim Thomas, and NYC PF Shamel Jones.
    
    Russ
    
77.1722At Mullins, UMass favoredAKOCOA::BREENWed Dec 06 1995 13:514
    UMass is favored by 10 at home, easy pickings for Jimbo.  Matchup
    should favor Camby's ability to neuatralize Duncan.
    
    Watch out for Larue.
77.1723"If you don't have anything nice to say..." ;-)STRATA::BARBIERIWed Dec 06 1995 14:568
      Boy, Jimbo, so far as UMass is concerned, why don't we just
      call you 'critic's corner'???
    
      You're making me start to hate UConn for cryin out loud!!!
    
    						Tony
    
      (P.S. Brett Favre MVP)
77.1724MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Dec 06 1995 15:265
    
      Jimbo's a UConn fan so it's a bit of a rivalry although
     because the teams don't really play each other and UMass
     has been far more successful than UConn in recent years
     it really isn't much of a rivalry. 
77.1725Room for Charleston and Cent. Conn, but not UMassTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Wed Dec 06 1995 16:359
    And it won't be a rivalry as long as Jim Calhoun is coaching at UConn,
    since he steadfastly refuses to play UMass.  Tough to fit UMass on
    UConn's grueling non-conference schedule, which includes such
    powerhouses as Northeastern, Yale, Fairfield, Charleston (SC),
    Hartford, and Central Connecticut!!!  Looks like Calhoun dug this
    schedule up from one of John Thompson's old pushovers list that he
    uses to pad his schedule!
    
    NAZZ
77.1726Huskies Are Really Scaredy Cats!LUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Dec 06 1995 16:439
      Calhoun must consult with the *real* Jimbo (so far as his scheduling
      is concerned)!!!
    
      So now the truth comes out!
    
      Geeez, they should've lost to Clemson way back when (in the 
      tournament).
    
    						Tony
77.1727BIGQ::MCKAYWed Dec 06 1995 16:4915
    Good spin Tommy.
    
    Someone has to be objective about UMASS, might as well be me 8*)
    
    UMASS has not been more successful than UCONN in hoop PERIOD!
    
    
    I think it is a geographical rivalry for me since I hear so
    much UMASS talk while being a UCONN fan.  Will they ever play?
    Probably not until they meet in a tournament pre-season or the big
    dance. 
    
    Jimbo  
    
    
77.1728CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearWed Dec 06 1995 17:0713
Some of that intrastate (I THINK I used the right word) is because it is what
the fans want to see it played.

I went to Central, and Central always wanted to play UConn in hoops but never
did while I was there.  It generates local interest when they do, and it does
help the CCSU hoops program, I'm sure.

I think they need a couple of the intrastate games, but not in the same year.

I think he played Northeastern as a favor to their coach who used to coach
with Calhoun....

'Saw
77.1729WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Dec 06 1995 18:5311
    
    
       Umass has been more sucessful than UConn?
    
         How many Championships have they won?
    
       They would finish 4th in the Big East this year.
    
    
    
    Chap
77.1730Lots of changes in the two leagues this yearILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersWed Dec 06 1995 19:1412
>>       They would finish 4th in the Big East this year.
    
	Sounds like the beginning of the annual Big East vs. Atlantic 10 (?)
	argument ...

	So far (I think) the score is Big East: 1 - A10: 0
	with Georgetown defeating Temple ...

	Have there been any other interleague matches that I missed?

	Vinny

77.1731So Kentucky and Maryland would be 5,6 (Wake 7th)AKOCOA::BREENWed Dec 06 1995 19:171
    
77.1732BE 2, A-10 0.... so farMROA::RSCHOTTWed Dec 06 1995 19:419
         Pitt defeated Duquesne during the last week of November .....
    can't remember the score.
    
    Russ
    
    - who believes that with a two guard "rotation", UMass would have a
    tough time cracking the BE Big Three over the course of an entire
    season.  If Charlton Clarke comes back and is the stud he's supposed to
    be, then its a different story.
77.1733tcm, meet Russ, Nazz your new masters AKOCOA::BREENWed Dec 06 1995 19:499
    I've seen cautious bunches before, I've even seen the crazy sandbagger
    in action but you minutepeople take the cake.  Instead of being
    outraged at the rank injustice of UMass being ranked number 3 after
    knocking off Kentucky,Maryland and Florida in 5 days I get this UMass
    fears BC stuff and #4 in the Big East total crapolla.
    
    Tommy give these guys a first class verbal whack in the head for me as
    only you can do it; my naturally kind disposition can't do them
    justice.
77.1734USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Dec 06 1995 19:516
Yeah, I'd like to know what measure you're using Tommy when you say
UMass has been more successful than UConn.  UMass' success in basketball
is still very recent, and coincides with UConn's success under Calhoun.
I don't think either has had more success in The Big Dance.  Maybe
it's UMass' string of conference titles in a conference that's weaker
than the BE, and plays its title game on one school's home floor ??
77.1735MROA::RSCHOTTWed Dec 06 1995 20:0412
    Bill, Bill, Bill:
    
         Even if Marcus continues his All-World play of late, playing
    Padilla and Travieso 39 minutes and 30 seconds per game is going to
    catch up with the UM'ies.  Perhaps even tonite or on Saturday.
    
    Russ
    
    - who can hear the chants of "Scoonie, Scoonie" erupting from the
      Breen household on Saturday, already.
    
    
77.1736Umass rolls....FABSIX::E_MAXWELLThe Land Of The Stainless MaidenThu Dec 07 1995 02:585
    
       Wake Forest                                46
       Massachusetts                              60
          Final                                
    
77.1737UMass in a walk(((((LUDWIG::BTOWERThu Dec 07 1995 09:464
    Ah, Jimbo. How do like YOUR Crow......................................
    
    PS: Are you gonna start some predictions for Basketball and call
        yourself IMJAMBO?
77.1738Another helping of crow over hereBIGQ::MCKAYThu Dec 07 1995 09:5710
    IMJAMBO - that has a nice ring to it.
    
    I didn't get to see the game, 9:30 is too late for me, I mean it's
    not like it was a UCONN or Big East game!
    
    I did see the stats 17-8-4 for Camby, 9-12-4 for Duncan.  Both shot
    something like 30%.  So Camby had a couple of more hoops and Duncan
    had a couple more rebounds.  Travis Knight will school them both!!!!
    
    Jimbo
77.1739CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearThu Dec 07 1995 11:467
>    had a couple more rebounds.  Travis Knight will school them both!!!!
>    
>    Jimbo

Travis was gettin' rowdy last night against ND.  I watched a bit of the game
whilst I was converting some files on my PC.

77.1740PCBUOA::MORGANThu Dec 07 1995 11:4971
    As is often the case, the suspenseful matchup between Camby and Duncan
    never materialized as both players were below average.  There were a
    few good highlights, but for the most part (especially Duncan) it was a
    letdown.  Is it me or does Tim Duncan make Brad Daugherty look like a
    crazed lunatic?  The guy has absolutely no fire.
    
    Donta Bright played great and the UMASS guards finally had a
    respectable game on the offensive end to go along with their always
    tenacious D.  That LaRue kid from Wake was unconscious for a while and
    was Wake's top scorer.  Below is the box score and it's interesting to
    look at Wake's dropoff after the first 2-3 players.
    
Massachusetts 60, Wake Forest 46
    
Wake Forest (46)
                      Fg    Ft    Rb
               Min   M-A   M-A   O-T  A Pf   Tp
Peral           18   0-3   0-0   1-2  1  4    0
Allen           25   0-1   0-2   2-4  1  4    0
Duncan          40  4-18   0-2  4-12  1  2    9
Larue           39  7-10   2-2   1-4  1  1   20
Rutland         40  3-13   6-8   0-2  1  2   15
Goolsby         23   1-3   0-0   1-3  2  2    2
Amonett          1   0-0   0-0   0-0  0  0    0
Wilson           1   0-0   0-0   0-0  0  0    0
Jackson         12   0-2   0-1   0-2  1  2    0
Stringfellow     1   0-0   0-0   0-1  0  0    0
_______________________________________________
Totals         200 15-50  8-15  9-30  8 17   46
_______________________________________________

Percentages: Fg-.300, Ft-.533. 3-Point Goals:
8-19, .421 (Peral 0-2, Duncan 1-2, Larue 4-6,
Rutland 3-8, Goolsby 0-1). Team Rebounds: 4.
Blocked Shots: 5 (Duncan 4, Allen). Turnovers: 15
(Allen 4, Rutland 4, Larue 3, Duncan 2, Peral 2).
Steals: 4 (Allen, Duncan, Jackson, Rutland).


Massachusetts (60)
                      Fg    Ft    Rb
               Min   M-A   M-A   O-T  A Pf   Tp
Dingle          36   0-2   5-6  4-10  3  1    5
Bright          28  8-14   6-7   1-4  1  3   22
Camby           37  6-19   5-8   1-9  2  1   17
E Padilla       39   4-9   0-0   0-8  4  2    9
Travieso        37   3-6   0-0   0-1  2  3    7
Maclay           1   0-0   0-0   0-0  0  0    0
Weeks           13   0-1   0-0   2-5  0  3    0
Nunez            5   0-1   0-0   1-1  0  0    0
Norville         4   0-1   0-0   0-1  0  3    0
_______________________________________________
Totals         200 21-53 16-21  9-39 12 16   60
_______________________________________________

Percentages: Fg-.396, Ft-.762. 3-Point Goals:
2-11, .182 (Bright 0-2, Camby 0-2, E Padilla 1-4,
Travieso 1-3). Team Rebounds: 1. Blocked Shots: 5
(Camby 3, Norville, E Padilla). Turnovers: 9
(Bright 3, E Padilla 2, Travieso 2, Camby,
Weeks). Steals: 7 (E Padilla 4, Dingle 2,
Norville).

__________________________________
Wake Forest        27   19  --  46
Massachusetts      30   30  --  60
__________________________________

Technical Fouls: None.  A: 9,493. Officials: Dick
Paparo, Larry Rose, Frank Scafolati.

77.17418^)CAM::WAYNine to the front, six to the rearThu Dec 07 1995 12:077
>    Donta Bright played great.....

Yes, but has his reading improved?


'Saw_for_JD

77.1742ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Thu Dec 07 1995 12:343
77.1743mebbe make it BE - 2, A!)LANDO::FARLEYThu Dec 07 1995 12:3414
    
    
    	Yabbut,
    Since I brought some nice and dry kindling wood, I thought I'd throw
    thses sticks into the A10-BE fire.
    
    Saturday ~12:00 at the Fleet Center, Boston College vs. UMass.
    
    be there or be square!
    
    I remain,
    also remembering itza on tee vee (WBZ) and the radion (1030)
    Kev
    
77.1744MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Dec 07 1995 12:376
    
 >> Gee, maybe if the Celtics win the lottery they'll be dumb enough to
 >> take Camby over Duncan leaving Duncan at #2 for Cleveland.
    
    That'd be fitting since Duncan looks and plays like Brad "If I only
    had a heart" Daugherty.
77.1745Two good comparisonsILBBAK::SILVESTRII have no answersThu Dec 07 1995 12:4812
>> >> Gee, maybe if the Celtics win the lottery they'll be dumb enough to
>> >> take Camby over Duncan leaving Duncan at #2 for Cleveland.
    
>>    That'd be fitting since Duncan looks and plays like Brad "If I only
>>    had a heart" Daugherty.

	... and Camby plays like Vin Baker of the Milwaukee Bucks
	(and I mean that in a good way - Baker was an All-Star last
	year) ... an athletic big man who can run the floor, block some
	shots and hit the short/medium jumper ... 
	
	Vinny
77.1746WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Thu Dec 07 1995 12:4811
    
    
         Lets just remember that UMass is #1 in in the A10 BC is probably
    5th or 6th in the BE. 
    
         Iverson would eat up Travieso and spit out Dingle!!!
    
       Whats that I hear???
    
          Dingle, My name is Dingle Jingle Jingle My name is Dingle Kringle
    Here comes oh Chris Kringle!!!!!
77.1747Again: Any player + 1ST Round pick for rights to CambyAKOCOA::BREENThu Dec 07 1995 13:0527
    Statistics obviously don't tell the tale as Camby had very much the
    best of the action last night.  This game was close right down to the
    two minute mark as Larue and Rutland both played well and the former is
    one of the best shooters in college ball since Ron Bonham.
    
    The difference between the big 2 was definitely spark although Duncan
    style is pure smooth and is very effective.  Camby shot poorly to start
    but heated up later and had the big basket to effectively clinch it at
    around the two minute mark.  The two guards were a bigger difference
    along with the excellent play of Dingle and Bright and quality minutes
    from Weeks and Norville.
    
    One of the big differences from last year is that the minutes of Roe
    and Kellogg are now taken up by simply better ballplayers not to speak
    of the player let go (?).  Better at least in the style Cal'i likes to
    use: total aggression with Camby to back it up.
    
    And you no longer need Bill Breen to tell you about Camby.  Dick Vitale
    has unleashed the full vent of his hypebole and his comparisons to
    Russell,Bird and Michael Jordan are right around the corner and make
    anything I've tried to say seem Duncanly (eg mild).
    
    Camby did come down with some heavy rebounds late in the game but that
    and protecting himself from fouls make one unsure of some facets but
    potentially he is the top draft pick since at least Shaquille.
    
    billte
77.1748MusingsLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Dec 08 1995 11:4931
      Minutes of Roe taken up by better ballplayers?  Who's that, Weeks???
      My goodness Bill, from whence did you originate?!!
    
      (just kidding...sort of!)
    
      Speaking of Big East/UMass, I would have to agree that the guard
      situation looms as such a big question mark though much less so than
      before the start of the season, but having those two guys need to
      log in so many minutes...
    
      The Big East is stronger than its been in quite awhile.  I think they
      have three teams that could make the Final 4.  Should the guards be
      able to handle the grind of 38+ minutes per game, I'd match UMass
      with Villanova/Georgetown/UConn and flip a coin.  Sure Iverson would
      more than handle Padilla, but I think UMass would win other matchups
      convincingly (center, small forward).
    
      If I could have UMass have any single extra player on their squad, it
      would be Iverson in a heartbeat!
    
      I think the Camby comparison to Baker is a good one and I sure like
      Baker being a Bucks fan (the STEAL of that draft).  The comparison
      might be a little premature though as Baker was able to put on some
      much needed pounds and while he is suited for PF, is near the top
      of the NBA in rebounds.
    
      I'm hoping for Bright to really shine.  22 points in 26 minutes
      playing time...man, lets hope we see someone really blossom.
    		
    							Tony
                                           
77.1749USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Dec 08 1995 17:2610
>      with Villanova/Georgetown/UConn and flip a coin.  Sure Iverson would
>      more than handle Padilla, but I think UMass would win other matchups
>      convincingly (center, small forward).

Tony,

You better check out G'town's frontline before you hand Camby his
statistical averages and more.  They're very big and athletic.
Ditto Lawson and Kornegay of Villanova.  I do think he'd have his
way with UConn though (sorry Jimbo).
77.1750just my observations, I do love watching that teamAKOCOA::BREENFri Dec 08 1995 18:0212
    Just an objective fan of good basketball who observed Roe doing nothing
    the second half of last year and the playoffs and UM playing better
    even last year with Padilla than Kellogg not to speak of course of
    Williams.  Weeks is a terrific rebounder and dana dingle-brighta +
    weeks is a much more effective use of the minutes.
    
    That doesn't mean that bench won't be a factor later on but the 6 or 7
    they use also means they always have effective players on the court. 
    And they certainly wouldn't be 4-0 right now if they had to shell out
    60 min/game for Kellogg and Roe: 10/per player maybe.
    
    One place I certainly didn't originate from is Amherst.
77.1751Never thought UMass would be 5-0TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Mon Dec 11 1995 12:2225
    Saturday's game went pretty much as I expected, with BC playing over
    their heads for much of the first half (67% FG for the first 16
    minutes!) and once the emotional tide ran its course the better team
    prevailed.  But BC was very impressive, coming back from 6 points down
    late in the game.  Abrams is a player, Penn is going to be terrific,
    and Jourdan and Woodard are decent college players.  Unfortunately for
    BC, they have as little depth as UMass right now.  Their starters
    scored all their points; UMass at least got a bucket from Weeks off
    their bench!
    
    The only disappointing thing about the entire day for me was BC coach
    Jim O'Brien equivocating afterwards about whether or not he would play
    UMass again next year.  Whereas Calipari said he'd love to play BC
    again next year and it would be great for both schools, O'Brien said
    there are a lot of factors to be considered, don't know if he would
    be able to work out the logistics, etc. etc. etc.  The game was
    terrific, the atmosphere was great, the fans from both schools really
    enjoyed it, and both schools made a ton of money.  Where's the problem?
    
    UMass now 5-0, with NC-Wilmington this week and Georgia Tech a week
    from Friday at the Meadowlands before they go to Honolulu and the
    Rainbow Classic after Christmas.  Charlton Clarke may be back for the
    game in the Centrum on Jan. 4 vs Memphis.  They sure could use him.
    
    NAZZ
77.1752the Commonwealth ClassicMROA::RSCHOTTMon Dec 11 1995 13:185
         Very entertaining game, the right outcome (from this fan's
    perspective ;^)), but boy, is it painful to watch UMass shoot the ball
    from outside!
    
    Russ
77.1753Did UMass get an edge on the officiating?AKOCOA::BREENMon Dec 11 1995 13:4416
    I agree with both of you.  Until the last big shot UMass couldn't shoot
    at all from the outside which made it more and more difficult for the
    front court.  Many of those were open shots too.
    
    BC gave the freshman Bedard way too many minutes, he just wasn't ready
    for this level on this day.  Bright had a great game.  And for those
    who missed it, it came down to the two all americas with Camby guarding
    Abrams and blocking the key shot following by Padilla's three pointer.
    
    O'Brien may be reacting to what he felt was an edge in officiating
    given to UMass.  Sean McDonough in diction and tone was subtly
    indicating the same but couldn't state it because he had to appear
    impartial.  He's much better at basketball than baseball announcing and
    the difference between Raftery and Packer is incredible with the latter
    just simply awful.  Why are fans of sports subjected to the very worst
    of announcers like Raftery in college bball and Musberger in golf.
77.1754MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceMon Dec 11 1995 13:516
    
       Had to like the job that Traveiso did on Scoonie Penn in the
      second half. Penn along with Abrams kept BC in the game. When
      Traveiso climbed in Penn's shirt and slowed him down, Umass
      pulled away. With everyone coming back next year for BC, they
      could be scary.
77.1755more on UMass-BCMROA::RSCHOTTMon Dec 11 1995 14:1318
         I have to agree with Bill, that having Woodward go to the bench
    with a fourth foul early in the second half was a major factor.  Bedard
    might be good contributor for BC down the road, but he looked
    overmatched in the game on Saturday.  He just didn't make anything
    happen.
    
         Once the momentum switched at the end of the first half, I
    expected UMass to pull away, but BC to their credit just hung in and
    hung in.  UMass' inability to hit any treys, or any outside shots in
    general, prevented them from being able to drive the proverbial
    "stake thru the heart"!
    
         Regarding the officiating, UMass shot 19 FT's, BC 16.  Abrams got
    to the line 10 times.  I would expect UMass to get a few more free
    throws given that they are more of an inside oriented team, and that
    they are the veteran team (hopefully, less prone to stupid fouls).
    
    Russ
77.1756BC's best bet would've been get Camby in foul troublAKOCOA::BREENMon Dec 11 1995 14:5313
    I thought it was a well officiated game and Camby was given the benefit
    of the doubt in that he didn't pick up the excessive fouls and
    therefore was able to play most of the 40 minutes.  Bad officiating or
    a BC edge would have meant Camby sitting down for foul trouble.
    
    Abrams is going to go to the line a lot because of his style.  Camby
    did a great job of staying planted in the last minute's showdown. 
    Coach Cal as usual kept Camby well away from Abrams for the first 30
    minutes (38 mins.?).
    
    Officiating definetly did not decide this game which is probably the
    only reason that one could say that it "favored" BC, if you get my
    drift.
77.1757USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Dec 11 1995 19:171
Who does UMass play in the 1st round of the Rainbow Classic ?
77.1758Can UMass go 4-0 against the ACC?MROA::RSCHOTTTue Dec 12 1995 11:236
    "Who does UMass play in the first round of the Rainbow Classic?"
    
    NC State, then the winner/loser of USC and Missouri.
    
    Russ
    
77.1759USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Dec 12 1995 12:295
>    NC State, then the winner/loser of USC and Missouri.

Russ,

Do you know the complete bracket ?
77.1760Rainbow Classic gamesMROA::RSCHOTTTue Dec 12 1995 12:4815
    Joe:
    
         The Rainbow Classic Pairings look like this:
    
    		Hawaii vs. URI
                Illinois vs. Syracuse
                ---------------------
                UMass vs. NC State
                Missouri vs. USC
    
         The games will be played December 28, 29, and 30, with certain
    games televised on ESPN at 1:30 a.m. EST.
    
    Russ
        
77.1761UMass/IllinoisLUDWIG::BARBIERITue Dec 12 1995 12:583
      Illinois/UMass could be a nice game if they both got that far.
    
    						Tony
77.1762UMass-URI in Hawaii - what could be better?!?!?TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Tue Dec 12 1995 13:053
    I'm looking forward to an all Atlantic-10 final.
    
    NAZZ
77.1763IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Tue Dec 12 1995 13:334
Interesting - Illinois and Syracuse are both 6-0.  Although Syracuse, and maybe
both, have gotten their W's against faux competition (the SJU game was the
exception to the rule).
77.1764AKOCOA::BREENTue Dec 12 1995 14:143
    I'd much rather see the Syracuse game (vs UMass).  UMass plays URI
    twice anyways, give those two a break.  Hawaii's always tough in the
    first game, travel,time zones etc.
77.1765USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Dec 12 1995 16:2910
>Interesting - Illinois and Syracuse are both 6-0.  Although Syracuse, and maybe
>both, have gotten their W's against faux competition (the SJU game was the
>exception to the rule).

Come again, Roland ?  Syracuse beat Providence on the road...more impressive
than SJU at home.  And Wash St has a decent team this year.

Illinois will be a huge test.  But how is that those two play each other
in a 1st-round game, while URI and Hawaii do the same ?  Also, it looks
like that part of the bracket is weaker than the UMass side.
77.1766Why the seedingsMROA::RSCHOTTTue Dec 12 1995 16:548
         Hawaii is the host school of the Rainbow Classic, and the
    promoters have a vested interest in making sure that they advance
    to a "winners bracket" game in the second round. (ie. attendance).
    URI is probably viewed as the weakest team, other than Hawaii, in
    the Tourney.  URI however, isn't a bad team, and will probably spoil
    the plan.
    
    Russ
77.1767Umass vs. UconnTLE::PHILLIPSWed Dec 13 1995 11:315
I watched both Uconn and Umass last night - Uconn was on ESPN, Umass
on ESPN 2. Both look real good - it would be a great game! Uconn is
also deeper than I thought. Unfortunately, if both stay in the top
10 - they'll likely not meet unless both get to the final 4. 
77.1768BIGQ::MCKAYWed Dec 13 1995 11:4320
    UCONN is a better team than UMASS hands down.  The have better height,
    much better depth, shoot better from the outside, better defensive
    pressure, faster, etc....
    
    I hope this is the year they meet in the BIG DANCE, because I'll
    be a rich man taking  5 bucks from every UMASS fan that sits within
    50 feet of me 8*)
    
    On a serious note it's tough to compare the two teams from last night
    since UMASS coasted against an obvious inferior opponent, while UCONN
    crushed a decent Florida State team who stunk up the joint.
    
    Vitales' sidekick made hime choose who would win between UCONN and
    UMASS and he picked UCONN.  Not a ringing endorsement considering
    the source, but one none the less from someone who has announced
    both teams.
    
    Jimbo
    
    
77.1769Yeah, UConn Is Obviously Very GoodLUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Dec 13 1995 11:499
      Last year, Tarkanian said the best NCAA playoff game was UCLA-UConn
      and he said UConn was the 2nd best team in the country.
    
      (Come to think of it, UCLA-Missouri wasn't bad!  Can you imagine
      if UCLA had lost that game?  A 2nd round loser instead of an NCAA
      champion!  Thats the one where Edney went the length of the court
      and scored with a scond left!)
    
    						Tony
77.1770Why UMass would beat UConnTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Wed Dec 13 1995 12:5611
    I think UMass would defeat UConn for several good reasons.  One is that
    without a true point guard, UConn would have a lot of trouble getting
    decent shots off against Padilla and Travieso.  Another is that UMass
    overall is simply too quick for UConn, and the UMass forwards handle
    the ball too well to be bothered by UConn's press.  I also don't think
    Jim Calhoun could contain himself mentally, and his lack to skill at
    coaching big games would cost UConn.  UMass is a very good free throw
    shooting team, which helps in close games.  Finally, the experience of
    the Minutemen in big games would be a deciding factor.
    
    NAZZ
77.1771BIGQ::MCKAYWed Dec 13 1995 13:2013
    Sheffer is not a true point guard?  Allen is going to have trouble
    against a Padilla getting a shot off even though he is taller, quicker,
    and can sky, I don't think so......  
    
    I love the knock on Calhoun and his lack of skill, care to enlighten
    with any particulars...
    
    UCONN's players easily have played in 50 more big games than the
    UMASS players as UMASS plays in the A-10, but you already knew that!
    
    Jimbo
    
    
77.1772I agree Nazz but what about...AKOCOA::BREENWed Dec 13 1995 14:0411
    I agree with Nazz, except of course he omitted the presence of Camby, a
    presence that has to be accounted for in any discussion.  I sort of
    understand where the UMass folks come from on Camby, like a collective
    breathholding.  But I'd think anyone from the other side whether BC or
    Conn. would always start with him.
    
    But as much as Camby makes UMass capable of beating Kentucky it also
    leaves you wary of his potential for foul trouble.  On that note, I see
    coach Calipari isn't wasting any time at all this year picking up his
    "broadside" technicals to send an early message to the refs "don't mess
    with Marcus"; that worked wonderfully Saturday.
77.1773IMOWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Dec 13 1995 14:418
    
    
       I agree with Jimbo.
    
        I think UMass's A10 schedule is gonna hurt them they might go into
    the Big dance undefeated. Noone in the A10 should touch them. Meanwhile
    Uconn will be facing top level competition in January/february. Umass
    will be going in with a false sense of security.
77.1774MROA::RSCHOTTWed Dec 13 1995 14:5819
    RE:  A10 Schedule
    
         Despite the mixed perceptions of the strength or weakness of the
    A10, the fact remains that last season, while playing one of, if not
    the toughest non-conference schedules around, UMass lost two games to
    non-conference opponents, and three games to A-10 foes.
    
         This season, Virginia Tech will be a Top 20 Team, George
    Washington with two good Russians and Kwame Evans, will be good once 
    they settle on a point guard, URI will be pretty decent, and Temple 
    will get its act together, and will be, well, Temple.  UMass was
    done in in the dance last year by injuries and by chemistry problems, 
    and not by the quality or lack there of, of the A-10.
    
          Mark my words, UMass will not run the deck in the A-10 this
    season.
    
    Russ 
    run the deck in the A-10
77.1775AKOCOA::BREENWed Dec 13 1995 16:138
    I agree with you Russ, the A10 should knock off UMass once or twice
    like last year and knock down their ranking.  The reason is they know
    Cal and Camby well and will base their entire stragegy on fouling out
    Marcus and making UMass beat them from the outside.  When the M'men hit
    la deluge, when their cold the makings of the upset.
    
    I'd love to see them run the deck prior to the A10 schedule though; I
    really want to see them get the #1 ranking they deserve right now.
77.1776USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Dec 13 1995 17:074
Predicting intra-conference losses is no biggie...it's expected.

I do think there's something to the thought of a weak A-10 schedule
not providing the upswing you need heading into the NCAA tourney.
77.1777UMass can still lose 4-5 regular season gamesTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Wed Dec 13 1995 17:2615
    And playing the likes of Rutgers, Seton Hall, Notre Dame, etc. will
    better prepare you?  I agree that the Big East is a stronger league
    this season, for the second year in a row.  THey have three top teams,
    and the A-10 has only UMass.  But after you eliminate UMass and
    Villanova, Georgetown, and UConn, the leagues are pretty much a wash.
    Virginia Tech is on a par with Syracuse, ditto Xavier and BC.  Temple
    and St. Joe's are a match for Providence and Miami.  
    
    So my point is that UMass has a chance to lose a couple of conference 
    games before the end of the regular season, and then they have to
    finish at Louisville, which will most likely have its starting forwards
    back in the lineup, unlike when they played BC.  Then the A-10
    tournament will no longer guarantee a UMass-Temple finale.
    
    NAZZ
77.1778UMass will go anyplace to play anyoneTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Wed Dec 13 1995 17:2913
    BTW, here is UMass' remaining non-conference schedule:
    
    DEC 22 - Georgia Tech at the Meadowlands
    DEC 27 - North Carolinia State in first round of Rainbow Classic
    DEC 28 and 29 - Two ther Rainbow Classic games
    
    JAN 4 - Memphis at the Worcester Centrum
    JAN 23 - at Pittsburgh
    MAR 2 - at Louisville
    
    Note that none of these games are at the Mullins Center
    
    NAZZ
77.1779Its a MUSTILBBAK::SILVESTRIUMass rules MassachusettsWed Dec 13 1995 17:5422
>>                   -< UMass will go anyplace to play anyone >-

	Will give credit where credit is due ... UMass does play an
	excellent out of conference schedule, they will play lots
	of high ranked opponents and they will schedule games outside
	of their own home court ... but I maintain that they HAVE to 
	do this because of the conference they are in ... because the
	majority of A10 games are against weak and/or non-descript 
	opponents, Calipari MUST schedule big time opponents at big
	time locations if he wants to make UMass a national program ...
	big time recruits are not going to go to Amherst, MA if the
	only teams UMass is playing are St Bonaventure/Duquense/URI etc ...
	and Calipari MUST schedule games outside of Mullins if he wants 
	his team ready for the big dance ... he needs to get his team 
	comfortable playing in large arena's since the A10 plays their 
	conference tourney finals on the regular season champions home 
	court ... other leagues move their conference tourney to a large
	venue that is "technically" neutral, the A10 hasn't ... this
	can help prep a team for the NCAA tournament ...

	Vinny

77.1780MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceWed Dec 13 1995 17:5511
   >> Virginia Tech is on a par with Syracuse, ditto Xavier and BC.  

      Unless Xavier is a top 25 (or so) team this is wrong. Anti-BC 
      biases aside the Eagles will be a pretty good team come tourney
      time. They're young but they've played UConn tough and couldn't
      overcome the Camby factor but no one has so far this year. Once
      Penn, Abrams, Jourdan and company develop some real chemistry
      the Eagles will be the proverbial team no one wants to play.
    
    
77.1781USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Dec 13 1995 18:2922
>      the Eagles will be the proverbial team no one wants to play.

And no one in the NCAA tournament will, 'cause they won't be there.
BC won't have the W's over enough (any ?) good teams to get in.


Re:  UMass playing anyone, anywhere

There's also another *big* reason for playing in places like
The Meadowlands -->  recruiting.  Jersey is loaded with big-time
talent nearly every year.  And Exit 16W is a stone's throw from
the G-W, so NYC kids can come and take a look-see too.


Recruiting advantages/disadvantages could be why BC and UConn don't
play UMass too.  What's there to gain for them ?  Their schools and
the Big East are their draw.  Scheduling UMass won't make a difference
to a kid considering BC.  But it does make a difference for Calipari
and the kid considering UMass.  The A-10 ain't gonna attract a kid.
But Calipari's nationwide barnstorming tour might.  And kids (especially
regional kids) on the fence between UMass and BC/UConn might be swayed
if UMass blows the Eagles/Huskies doors in.
77.1782recruiting is the biggest reason whyWRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatWed Dec 13 1995 19:1729
RE: .1781

> Recruiting advantages/disadvantages could be why BC and UConn don't
> play UMass too.  What's there to gain for them ?  Their schools and
> the Big East are their draw.  Scheduling UMass won't make a difference

This, IMO, is the chief reason why you don't see these teams regularly square
off. Despite my UMass/A10 biases, the Big East clearly has the better conference
in terms of recruiting/media coverage (with its top teams, UConn, Georgetown,
etc. clearly reaping the benefits).

Why should UConn play UMass (i.e. what do they have to gain?) ?? They
consistently recruit at a higher level than UMass, getting kids that are (on
average) rated more highly than UMass's recruits. If UConn were to lose to
UMass, it's quite possible that this loss could effect some of the recruiting
advantage they currently have over UMass.

In the same way, an annual BC/UMass event benefits BC far more than UMass. UMass
currently holds the recruiting edge over BC. This edge could easily swing the
other way if BC proved to be very competitive against UMass (or, bite your
tongue, beat UMass) and got the media attention everyone knows they're going to
get as soon as they start to win.

From a fan's viewpoint it's nice to see UMass/BC but I'd rather see Umass take
on the likes of Kentucky / Arkansas / Kansas / North Carolina from a competition
and recruiting standpoint.


Chris
77.1783TLE::PHILLIPSThu Dec 14 1995 10:5510
Where does UMASS think they are going to play 1-A football? I saw mention
of that again about a week ago in the Boston Globe. Uconn is very quiet
on their move - which to me seems like they are going to back down and stay
1-AA.

On the outcome of Umass/Uconn, while it is entertaining to guess which team
would win - I wouldn't want to bet much on either side. Both teams are very
good. If Camby is hot, NOBODY will stop him. Same goes for Allen. Both teams
can score inside or out - both can play good defense, both can run, ...
                                     
77.1784Sure Makes SenseLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Dec 14 1995 11:282
      I never thought of the recruting factor, but it makes a lot of
      sense.  Too much sense actually!!
77.1785"Don't forget Temple"AKOCOA::TROYThu Dec 14 1995 12:165
    
    More Big East hype deflated as A10 Temple makes 'Nova look confused,
    slow and panicky last might.  Temple gets ready for the Big games, and
    can't be counted out of A10 championship nor Middle tier pick in the
    64.
77.1786Don't Leave Me Hanging!STRATA::BARBIERIThu Dec 14 1995 14:173
    re: -1
    
      What was the score?!!
77.1787MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Dec 14 1995 14:269
    
    
     62-56. Kittles was a non-factor and Temple was in control for
     pretty much the entire second half.
    
     Jimbo McKay thinks the UConn kids have played 50 more big games than
     UMass' kids. Besides the tourney and the tough out of conference sched-
     ule try playing JOHn Chaney and Mike Jarvis led teams twice a year. 
    
77.1788The Temple WayHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedThu Dec 14 1995 14:277
As IMJIMBO might say, you could see this one coming.

Sometime at or around getting a bit of a lead, Villanova quit on this
game and let Temple not only get back in it but dictate how it would be
played.

TTom
77.1789Kittles = no nadsUSCTR1::GARBARINOThu Dec 14 1995 16:334
>     62-56. Kittles was a non-factor and Temple was in control

Didn't see the game, but it sounds like last year's pathetic NCAA
performance by 'Nova, when Kittles ALSO disappeared.
77.1790'Nova Screwed Me/MemphisLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Dec 15 1995 11:2712
      If not for Villanova, I would have done mega-well in a 'friendly'
      pool.  I had North Carolina, Arkansas, UCLA, and Villanova in the
      Final 4 with UCLA beating Arkansas.
    
      Villanova nailed me!
    
      Say, the USA Today had an article on Memphis (no longer Memphis
      State) yesterday.  These guys are #8 nationally and some say the
      most athletic team in the entire country.  It sounds like they are
      a powerful team.  That'll be a test come January 4.
    
    							Tony
77.1791Hello, again...IAMOK::BARRYFri Dec 15 1995 12:5940
    It's been a long time since I've been in this notesfile. It took UMass
    v BC to bring me back in. A week has passed since the game was played,
    and I wanted to add my perspective (proudly BC, by the way) to the
    commentary.
    
    Some observations....
    
    1. The game should have been played two years ago, and it should now be
       an annual event. The new Garden is the right venue.
    
    2. Camby's a hell of a player. Without Camby's two blocks (on Abrams
       and, more importantly, on Woodward) it's anyone's game going into
       final minutes. To be honest, if Woodward's shot falls, I believe BC
       wins that game. It would have put BC ahead by two.
    
    3. Bright did what he had to do to win the game. With Camby double
       teamed, he was able to make BC pay.
    
    4. Give UMass BC's guards (even Bedard) and they go a long way this
       spring in the NCAA's. With Padilla and Travieso, they'll go only as far
       as Camby takes them. My guess is that will not be to the final four.
    
    5. O'Brien has done an awful job bringing Mickey Curley along. He has
       talent, but he's not included in their offensive scheme and looks lost
       out there.
    
    6. Keenan Jourdan at 6'7" did an admirable job on Camby. If only he
       wouldn't take those foolish shots. 
    
    7. If Camby goes pro next year, AND if they play this game again, BC
       wins by +10 points.
    
    8. Tyrone Weeks is awful. 
    
    That's it folks. Good luck to UMass the rest of the way. I enjoyed the
    game. It was good, hard, honest basketball, and, while it will be a
    good long time before I buy a UMass hat, I actually find myself
    watching these guys when they're on the tube and enjoying it !
    

77.1792And you can lok it up!TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass knocks off #1 - again!Fri Dec 15 1995 17:097
    So far this season the Atlantic-10 is 4-2 vs the Big East, after
    Temple's defeat of Villanova.  Temple is around the 4th or 5th best
    team in the A-10, and 'Nova was the #2 team in the country.  Last year
    was the first year since 1990-91 that the Big East had a winning record
    vs. the Atlantic-10.
    
    NAZZ
77.17934-2 who leads?ILBBAK::SILVESTRIUMass rules MassachusettsFri Dec 15 1995 18:3721


>>                          -< And you can lok it up! >-
>>    So far this season the Atlantic-10 is 4-2 vs the Big East, after
>>    Temple's defeat of Villanova.  

	I will.

	The games that I can recall are:

	UMass over BC
	Temple over Villanova

	Georgetown over Temple
	Pittsburgh over Duquense
	mumble-mumble over Duquense

	What other games were there?

	Vinny
77.1794MROA::RSCHOTTFri Dec 15 1995 18:434
         Actually, I believe WVU defeated Duquesne, for another victory in
    the BE column.
    
    Russ
77.1795IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Fri Dec 15 1995 18:451
I thought WVU was A-10...
77.1796New look A10ILBBAK::SILVESTRIUMass rules MassachusettsFri Dec 15 1995 19:2222
	Here is the current Atlantic-10 (12) conference:

EAST
                        -CONFERENCE-    -OVERALL-
TEAM                   W   L   PCT.   W   L   PCT. 
MASSACHUSETTS          0   0   .000   6   0  1.000
ST JOSEPHS PA          0   0   .000   2   0  1.000
RHODE ISLAND           0   0   .000   4   2   .667
ST BONAVENTURE         0   0   .000   3   2   .600
TEMPLE                 0   0   .000   2   3   .400
FORDHAM                0   0   .000   0   3   .000

WEST
                        -CONFERENCE-    -OVERALL-
TEAM                   W   L   PCT.   W   L   PCT.
VIRGINIA TECH          0   0   .000   3   0  1.000
GEO WASHINGTON         0   0   .000   4   2   .667
DAYTON                 0   0   .000   3   2   .600
DUQUESNE               0   0   .000   2   2   .500
XAVIER OH              0   0   .000   2   3   .400
LASALLE                0   0   .000   2   6   .250

77.1797New Look Big East - Rutgers, WVU added from A10, plus indy Notre DameILBBAK::SILVESTRIUMass rules MassachusettsFri Dec 15 1995 19:2424
	And here is the Big East:

 BIG EAST 7
                        -CONFERENCE-    -OVERALL- 
 TEAM                   W   L   PCT.   W   L   PCT. 
 SYRACUSE               2   0  1.000   7   0  1.000
 GEORGETOWN             2   0  1.000   7   1   .875
 MIAMI FLA              1   1   .500   4   1   .800
 SETON HALL             1   1   .500   3   2   .600
 RUTGERS                1   1   .500   2   3   .400
 PITTSBURGH             0   1   .000   2   2   .500
 PROVIDENCE             0   2   .000   4   2   .667
 
 BIG EAST 6
                        -CONFERENCE-    -OVERALL- 
 TEAM                   W   L   PCT.   W   L   PCT. 
 CONNECTICUT            2   0  1.000   7   1   .875
 VILLANOVA              2   0  1.000   7   1   .875
 BOSTON COLLEGE         1   1   .500   5   2   .714
 WEST VIRGINIA          0   1   .000   2   2   .500
 ST JOHNS               0   2   .000   3   3   .500
 NOTRE DAME             0   2   .000   2   3   .400


77.1798IMBETR::DUPREZWill work for sleep..Fri Dec 15 1995 19:268
Va. Tech. - A10 in hoops, Big East in football.

How do schools get themselves in these situations?

I'm really out of touch - W.Va. is Big East now?  They used to be the reverse
of what VaTech is now.

Fordham - there's two easy wins for UMass.
77.1799Need a program to sort out conference aligmnetsILBBAK::SILVESTRIUMass rules MassachusettsFri Dec 15 1995 19:3927
>> Va. Tech. - A10 in hoops, Big East in football.

	Temple is in the same boat ... and both wanted in to the Big East
	(basketball) but were not accepted this past year ... seems the
	non-football schools have a problem with the football schools ...
	and some of the entrnched Big East members don't want local rivals
	invading their turf ...	this divided sports conference stuff is one 
	of the reasons Penn State went to the Big 1(11)0 ... they didn't 
	want to sit around and wait for the conference alignments to shake 
	themselves out ...

	And, according to the USA Today Online, these are the Big East / A10
        matchups to date (unless I overlooked any) ...

        12/09   UMass 65                Boston College 57        
	12/13   Temple 62               Villanova 56        

	11/18   Georgetown 74           Temple 49        
	11/29   Pittsburgh 84           Duquense 73        
	12/09   West Virginia 93        Duquense 77        

	And next week (not counting possible holiday tournaments):
         West Virgina plays Virginia Tech
         St Johns plays Fordham   
         Notre Dame plays Xavier

	So the score is currently BE 3, A10 2 ... 
77.1800TempleLUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Dec 20 1995 16:308
      Speaking of Temple downing Villanova, they then go to Cleveland
      (I don't think it was in Cincinnatti) and get totally spanked
      by the Bearcats.  Fortson (at one time deciding between Cinci,
      Wisconsin, and UMass) did quite well by the way.
    
      Cincinnatti has been looking really good.
    
    							Tony
77.1801ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 20 1995 19:013
77.1802IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Dec 20 1995 19:042
Compared to most of the words that get misspelled in here, "Cincinnati"
is a real brain-teaser...
77.1803MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::longSome gave allWed Dec 20 1995 19:056
	For probably the same reason you welch on p-name bets.

	


	billl
77.1804ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Dec 20 1995 19:273
77.1805OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Dec 20 1995 20:153
77.1806COLLEGE HOOPS!~ WATTA SPROT!~HBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedThu Dec 21 1995 12:3610
And speaking of Cincinnati, they came back to whoop them Cal Bears lasted
night in one of a couple of good games. They were down pretty big in the
second half but ended up winning 77-70 or something in that ilk.

The other good college hoops game was the Illinois at Missouri matchup.
Missouri blocked a layup at the end of regulation to force overtime which
went back and forth until finally Illinois pulled away and got the win on
the road.

TTom
77.1807ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Thu Dec 21 1995 12:472
77.1808Updated resultsILBBAK::SILVESTRISoar with the Eagles!Thu Dec 28 1995 19:0438
Updated A10 vs Big East results ... Big East now leads 6-3 ... with only
a few more possibe matchups during the regular season ...

And, to keep this related to the base topic ... Jeff Sagarin's Computer
Based rankings have UMass #2 in the nation, just behind Cincinatti ...
UConn and Georetown are the two highest Big East teams, tied for 
fourth/fifth ... Syracuse is right around #10 ...

Vinny

Duquesne (4-2, 0-0 A-10)
 Nov.  29  Lost at Pittsburgh, 84-73
 Dec.   9  Lost at West Virginia, 93-77
 Dec.  28  Georgetown at Lakeland, Fla.

Fordham (1-5, 0-0 A-10)
 Dec.  23  Lost to St. John's, 66-47

Massachusetts (7-0, 0-0 A-10)
 Dec.   9  Defeated Boston College, 65-57
 Dec.  27  at Hawaii Rainbow Classic     (possible Syracuse matchup)

Rhode Island (5-2, 0-0 A-10)
 Dec.   9  Lost to Providence, 83-76

St. Joseph's (Pa.) (3-1, 0-0 A-10)
 Dec.  28  at Seton Hall Tournament     (possible Seton Hall matchup)

Temple (3-4, 0-0 A-10)
 Nov.  18  Lost at Georgetown, 74-49
 Dec.  13  Defeated Villanova, 62-56

Virginia Tech (4-1, 0-0 A-10)
 Dec.  18  Defeated West Virginia, 68-62

Xavier (Ohio) (3-5, 0-0 A-10)
 Dec.  23  Lost to Notre Dame, 72-70

77.1809Number One UMASS Rolls OnGLRMAI::ERASMIFri Dec 29 1995 12:2021
    UMASS beat North Carolina St last night 78-67. They play USC tonight as
    they upset Missouri 75-64. Padilla (38 mins) and Travieso (40 mins) are
    going to be very tired by the time these three straight games are over.
    Not having a third guard will probably catch up with them on Saturday
    when they play ??? is it Syracuse/ Illinois. Box score from last night
    for Umass.... 
    
     
                       FG    FT    RB
                   MIN   M-A   M-A   O-T  A PF  PTS
    Dingle          34   3-6   5-7   1-8  2  1   11
    Bright          26   4-8   4-4   1-3  1  2   12
    Camby           30  8-18   3-4   3-8  7  3   19
    Travieso        40  6-11   0-1   0-1  3  0   16
    E.Padilla       38   1-8   0-0   1-2  9  1    3
    Burns            1   0-0   0-0   0-0  0  0    0
    G. Padilla       1   0-0   0-0   0-0  0  0    0
    Maclay           1   0-0   0-0   0-0  0  0    0
    Weeks            12  5-6   2-2   1-3  1  2   12
    Norville         15  2-3   1-2   0-1  0  4    5
    Cottrell          1  0-0   0-0   0-0  0  0    0                   
77.1810SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Fri Dec 29 1995 12:365
    
    	Looks like Camby went 5-5 in the second half. He stunk up the
    joint in the 1st half shooting 3-13.
    
    Ron
77.1811TODD FULLER ROOLZ!~HBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Dec 29 1995 12:540
77.1812Still looking forward to the UMass-URI finalTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is #1 - again!!!Fri Dec 29 1995 14:3414
    Have you ever seen a more sweeping lefty hook than Fuller's?!?!?!?
    
    He looked good for a while but UMass shut him down over the last ten
    minutes or so.  Dana Dingle finally decided to guard that 00 after he
    hit his third three of the first half.  The entire team (except for
    Travieso, who continues to play terrific ball) looked flat in the
    first half.  Big lift from Weeks in the 2nd half - he's more agile
    than that bulky body appears.
    
    I know nothing about USC, but they handily defeated Missouri, so they
    must be pretty good.  I'm pissed the game is only on ESPN2!
    
    NAZZ
    
77.1813Pack needs less of LesHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Dec 29 1995 14:4517
>    Have you ever seen a more sweeping lefty hook than Fuller's?!?!?!?

I think he's been watching too many George Zidek tapes. Actually, Todd
blossomed late in high school under the tutelage of Bobby Jones,
erstwhile Tar Heel and Sixer.

>    He looked good for a while but UMass shut him down over the last ten
>    minutes or so.  

I'd say 30 points and what 12-14 rebounds in what you're saying was 30
minutes of play is looking good.

Fuller's problem is the basic problem at State. Little help and a
miserable coach who usually screws up what little talent he's managed to
get.

TTom
77.1814AKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustFri Dec 29 1995 16:509
    >under the tutelage of Bobby Jones,  erstwhile Tar Heel and Sixer.
    
    We know all about him Ttom.
    
    Also, nice to see Nazz coming around on the subject of Weeks.  I've
    never seen a bad minute from him in two years.  And Norville with 15
    minutes of pt.  I see Memphis got in a nice prep run for its UMass
    game; at least they won over Temple - a loss would have left them nasty
    for the minutemen.
77.1815couldaHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Dec 29 1995 17:018
>    >under the tutelage of Bobby Jones,  erstwhile Tar Heel and Sixer.
>    
>    We know all about him Ttom.

Wail, I didn't want anyone thinking that he learned basketball from a
dead golfer.

TTom
77.1816Most Impressive VictoryCOPS02::MARTINTue Jan 02 1996 11:5814
    What an impressive permormance by the Minutemen in their victory over
    Syracuse Sunday morning.  That second half was incredible.  The first
    four minutes were played on the UMASS end of the court!!!!  I think
    it's time to give these guards their due.  Padilla is like a cat, he is
    so quick and he doesn't turn the ball over very much.  The guards have
    been the key to the season thus far.  The defensive intensity was
    stepped up in the second half and the game was pretty much secure
    midway through the half.  The guards are also able to handle full 
    court pressure very well.  This team seems to be getting better as the 
    season progresses.  I'm looking forward to Thursday and the game vs
    Memphis.
    
    
    Thomas
77.1817What's Up with Weeks and Clarke?GLRMAI::WILKESTue Jan 02 1996 12:195
    Does anyone know why Tyrone Weeks was a DNP against Syracuse?
    
    What is the latest prognosis on Charlton Clarke? As well as Padilla and
    Travieso having been playing UMass is going to need some minutes from
    someone else at guard before the season is out.
77.1818WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Jan 02 1996 12:268
    
    I can't believe I stayed up until 3:00 am to watch the Orange
    choke :^)
    
    In all seriousness, the better team won, but I was really 
    disappointed with the 2nd-half play of SU.  
    
    - Sean
77.1819I watched first thing in the morningGLRMAI::WILKESTue Jan 02 1996 12:324
    re: -1
    
    You should have taped the game and watched in the morning before
    listening to any scores. Its much less tiring that way.
77.1820Masterful defense by UMass, especially the guardsTNPUBS::NAZZAROSyracuse fan for a weekTue Jan 02 1996 15:5814
    I stayed up for it, and wasn't the least bit disappointed!!!  Travieso
    played incredible man-to-man defense against Sims - totally took him
    out the game, holding him scoreless and never letting Sims run the
    offense comfortably.  Padilla was all over the place, making steals and
    denying entry passes.  And the nice thing about those two is they play
    clean, straight defense - no phony flops, no extra muscle, no silly
    reaches.  They mose their feet, they anticipate, they deny people the
    spots where the want to go.  Simply a clinic against Syracuse.
    
    Clarke is due back in about two weeks, perhaps for the URI game at the
    Mullins Center on Jan. 17.  As for Weeks, I also wondered why he never
    made an appearance against Syracuse.  He had been playing very well.
    
    NAZZ
77.1821No Camby weren't worth watching - I'd have been wrongAKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustTue Jan 02 1996 17:2110
    I missed the game since Camby wasn't supposed to play and wouldn't
    consider the result meaningful if he sat. "mose their feet"???  A new
    tech.term but defense is certainly played from waist down.  Calipari
    has done a tremendous job and btw called Dana Dingle the mvp of the
    tournement (dingle didn't make all tourney, neither did Camby
    (hilarious since he's the mvp of every game he's ever in same as
    Russell was with San Fran and Celtics).
    
    Weeks had to have been a late injury sit unless their was some holiday
    hijinks Cal didn't approve of.
77.1822IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Jan 02 1996 17:245
>    (hilarious since he's the mvp of every game he's ever in same as
>    Russell was with San Fran and Celtics).

You must have had great seats at those Dons home games.  You were in the
student section, right?  :-)
77.1823MROA::RSCHOTTTue Jan 02 1996 17:3111
         I have read somewhere that Tyrone Weeks continues to suffer
    with pain in his feet (this after surgery last summer), and takes
    occasional days off from practice.  Perhaps the coaching staff felt
    that three games in three days would be too much.
    
         The UMass-Memphis State game on Thursday should be another interesting
    game.  Memphis has been described by some as "the most athletic team in 
    America".  They have had relatively close games with Purdue, Tennessee
    and Temple, and have blown out 4 or 5 cupcakes.
    
    Russ
77.1824USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jan 02 1996 18:558
Congrats to UMass fans.  Your team obviously plays defense at another
level.  That's the lowest point total by a Syracuse team since '68-69.

Going to full-court pressure was smart.  Sims is an adequate PG, but
not one who can break down a defense, or who's a scoring threat.

Other than the Temple games, is Thursday's Memphis game the last big
test of the season for UMass ?
77.1825exMSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceTue Jan 02 1996 18:575
 >> Other than the Temple games, is Thursday's Memphis game the last big
 >> test of the season for UMass ?
    
    I think they also play Virginia Tech twice.
77.1826 ouisville and Temple (2)COPS02::MARTINTue Jan 02 1996 19:136
    They also have Louisville at the end of the season. (Although I don't
    know if Louisville is still in top 25)
    
    There's only one game vs VA Tech......but 2 vs Temple.
    
    Thomas 
77.1827On this I agree with NazzAKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustTue Jan 02 1996 19:249
    You  may want to observe that Duquesne almost knocked off Georgetown.
    
    UMass should beat Memphis but won't go undefeated in the A-10 with too
    many of those home court boilermakers out there.  These teams know how
    to pack the middle and make the guards beat them while hoping to get
    Camby and others in foul trouble.
    
    And UMass will need a loss or two so as not to be overpressured in the
    ncaa.
77.1828USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jan 02 1996 19:427
>    UMass should beat Memphis but won't go undefeated in the A-10 with too
>    many of those home court boilermakers out there.

Intra-conference games produce upsets all the time.  I was focusing more
on the *quality* of opponents as we head down the road to the NCAA tourna-
ment.  Memphis and Louisville will likely be in the field of 64.  I don't
know what A-10 teams are givens at this point.
77.1829SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Tue Jan 02 1996 19:477
    
    	Camby didn't make the All-tournament team because he wasn't even on
    the ballot. The voting is typically done before the START of the final
    game. Since Camby wasn't suppose to play they didn't put him on the
    ballot.
    
    Ron
77.1830Padilla under the weatherMROA::RSCHOTTThu Jan 04 1996 11:327
         Guard Edgar Padilla had an overniter at the UMass Infirmary on
    Tuesday/Wednesday with the flu, but is expected to play tonite.
    
         This team picks up more "bugs" than your average Kindergarten 
    class!
    
    Russ
77.1831CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Jan 04 1996 12:026
    
    should be a good one tonight and a late one.......
    
    I'll be there section 230..........
    
    mike
77.1832Mommy will be upset!CNTROL::SALMONThu Jan 04 1996 12:081
    Can't be that late, you've got a curfew if I remember correctly!
77.1833Go UMass, clean sweep of the pre-A10AKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustThu Jan 04 1996 13:337
    It's funny what good basketball will do.  There's me up late or taping
    UMass (very extraordinary), Childs actually going to Mullins (or is it
    the Centrum) and I'm sure quite a few of the fans of other programs
    taking a special interest in the Minutemen.
    
    A lot of it has to do with Cal's intersectional schedule and fear no
    one attitude and of course the team itself.
77.1834IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Jan 04 1996 13:366
>    A lot of it has to do with Cal's intersectional schedule and fear no
>    one attitude and of course the team itself.

And a lot of it has to do with the extensive bandwagon expansion and 
renovation that UMass undergoes every off-season.  Need room for all of
those new "life-long" fans... :-)
77.1835CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineThu Jan 04 1996 13:472
    
    It's at the Centrum. I live in Worcester. A perfect fit..........
77.1836You calling me???!! a front runner??AKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustThu Jan 04 1996 14:2414
    This "bandwagon jumping" has become a cliche.  There are true cases of
    it but since generally people root harder for teams when they start
    winning.  To pin a label I would think it would have to be something
    out of the ordinary.  We used to use the term front runner which I
    think is more accurrate.
    
    I will say this about the fans of UMass: they have always been there
    and been there hard and loud including 60s and 70s when they and most
    of the east were an afterthought in college baskets.  I can't say that
    about BC basketball fandom which is essentially a cottage industry. You
    can really guage fans by NIT attendance and cheering (not any more of
    course, sadly) and UMass (and UConn) were at the top at Madison Sq
    '65-'85.  I would put Va Tech Hokies fans as #1 with the Thundering
    Herd a close second.
77.1837USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jan 04 1996 16:439
>And a lot of it has to do with the extensive bandwagon expansion

Every team in every sports has a significant "bandwagon effect" when
they're winning.  There just aren't that many *diehards* who are there
thru thick-and-thin.

Hey Bill Breen, you mentioned something about UMass being a regular in
the NIT from '65-85, is this really true ?  I don't remember UMass having
any kind of hoop team pre-Calipari.
77.1838CAM::WAYRidi pagliaccioThu Jan 04 1996 16:457
>Hey Bill Breen, you mentioned something about UMass being a regular in
>the NIT from '65-85, is this really true ?  I don't remember UMass having
>any kind of hoop team pre-Calipari.

Well, they did have Dr J. didn't they?


77.1839AKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustThu Jan 04 1996 17:2318
    Yeh I saw UMass in the NIT several times not even including the Dr. J
    year.  They had pretty well coached teams albeit with mostly local
    basketball products.  They were on about a par with BC for most of that
    period and started the big fade when the big money started controlling
    college baskets and it was either go big and expensive or small and cheap
    (see Holy Cross).  I think the UMass coach is now their announcer.
    
    I would say they had 4-6000 fans in NewYork on a Saturday afternoon. 
    My regrets to those of you who never got to take in the Saturday-Sunday
    doubleheaders not to speak of the weeknight games.  It never ceased to
    amaze how many fans could turn up rooting for Indiana or Minnesota not
    to speak of any Atlantic Coast conference team.  And of course Notre
    Dame and the strange coincidence of the 34 foul shots to the opponents
    4 (ND - SCal circa '74) and it's dead cert predictability.
    
    UMass tried small and decided on the big gamble with Calipari.  I'll
    leave it to someone else to decide whether UMass as an institution is
    better off than Holy Cross at this point.
77.1840MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceThu Jan 04 1996 17:238
    
      I was a fan when a kid from my hometown, John Murphy from
     Clinton, was their best player. Otherwise, like Joe G says
     it took them winning to rekindle my interest. My only excuse
     albeit rather weak is that they really really stunk for a 
     long time and they play out there where we never got any news
     of them and they were never on tv and the sun was in my eyes 
     and ...
77.1841Clinton, Ma.'s Finest HoopsterMROA::RSCHOTTThu Jan 04 1996 17:3914
    Re:  John Murphy
    
         Even though he had zilch for foot speed and jumping ability, John
    Murphy was 6'8" and had one of the sweetest jump shots around.  He was
    drafted in the late rounds in 1975/6 by the Chicago Bulls, but ended
    up playing hoop in Europe.  Even though he'd have a tough time keeping
    up with Calipari's current crop of greyhounds, I'm sure Coach Cal would
    find a place for him today, just to utilize his jumper.
    
         Sadly, John succumbed to cancer around 1980, one of four members
    of the 1975 UMass club (Alex Eldridge, Rick Boron, ?) to suffer early
    deaths.
    
    Russ
77.1842IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Jan 04 1996 17:502
Tommy, you forgot the dog eating your homework... :-)
77.1843Will Need To Step UpLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Jan 04 1996 18:054
      Just heard on the radio that Weeks is definitely not playing
      and Padilla is uncertain.
    
    						Tony
77.1844UMass under the weather for tonight's gameTNPUBS::NAZZAROSyracuse fan for a weekThu Jan 04 1996 18:1010
    I saw JOhn Murphy just a few months before he died.  He was just a
    shell of his former self, but at least on this night managed to keep up
    a good front despite the cancer that ravaged his body.
    
    Weeks has an intestinal flu that kept him out of the Syracuse game and
    will keep him sidelined tonight.  Padilla has a milder form of the flu
    and though in the infirmary yesterday, is expected to dress tonight. 
    How much PT he gets remains to be seen.
    
    NAZZ
77.1845USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Jan 04 1996 18:2011
>      Padilla is uncertain.

Is that the same "uncertain" that was used for Camby going into the
Rainbow Classic Final ?   :^)


Hey Russ, that's a sad story about the 4 players from the '75 UMass club.


And Bill, when you ask "which institution is better off" (HC or UMass),
you're specifically talking about the athletic program, right ?  :^)
77.1846CAM::WAYRidi pagliaccioThu Jan 04 1996 18:4910
>
>    I saw JOhn Murphy just a few months before he died.  He was just a
>    shell of his former self, but at least on this night managed to keep up
>    a good front despite the cancer that ravaged his body.
>    

I'm reminded of the A. E. Houseman poem "To An Athlete Dying Young"


How very sad.....
77.1847"Bball a long tradition - with 8 yr hiatus"AKOCOA::TROYThu Jan 04 1996 22:4838
    
    I was a UMIE and pretty close to a fanatic UMASS BBALL fan circa
    '73-'76 - rockin' the Cage.  I was also a pledge of Lambda Chi Alpha -
    the bball frat, and often played pickup ball at Boyden with Boron. Rick
    was a good athlete - and Leaman liked him, but he was a tweener between
    shooting guard and small forward, a role taken by Al Skinner largely,
    and I think only played JV/Frosh ball.
    
    Murphy was a good guy - a bit quiet.  Jack Leaman was the coach and was
    often heard to say "Murphy, MY Way, Murphy" when John would go a bit
    nuts.  my wife and I still quote that sometimes. I still remember
    John's "Dutch Boy" haircut bouncing on his long corner turnaround
    jumpshots.
    
    Anyway, Alex Eldridge, who took over a point guard for Rick Pitino on
    his graduation, died about 1979 or 1980 also. Tremendous floor leader.
    
    On a more buoyant note - I remember how focussed Pitino was on his
    career - he told us at dinner one night his ultimate goal was to coaCH
    THE KNICKS, and he had a whole plan of what he needed to do to get
    there.  We all thought he was nuts - but damned if he didnt follow the
    path almost exactly as he laid it out - 2 assistant jobs, 1 second tier
    Head college job (BU), then PC, etc.  He remains for the poster child
    for having a career plan.  
    
    And Al Skinner did well from those days - oh that they had the stuff in
    college back then, Al could sky and could only lay it in. 4-5 years in
    the NBA.  
    
   For Boston Bball trivia addicts, my wife still has a crush on Greg
    Duarte, a Hyde Park All Body team product.
    
    The big difference was exposure for those New England teams - so few
    college games were on tv it really hurt at NCAA at large pick time - so
    it seemed is was buses to the NIt at Madison Sq, back when the whole
    tournament was apost-season and played in NY.
    
    Bill Troy
77.1848UMASS BBALL MemoriesCOPS02::MARTINFri Jan 05 1996 11:3916
    I went to UMASS from 1970-1975.  The BBALL team back then was always
    one of the better teams in New England.  BC, Holy Cross, Providence,
    Syracuse were amomg the Non conference games every year.  As part of
    the Yankee Conference UMASS and UCONN played twice a year.  I recall
    victories at the cage vs BC (Greg Duarte throws in 37 pts), Syracuse
    (Dr J's final game 36 pts and 32 boards) UCONN (tough ball
    games....Tony Hansen was a player)........and that heart breaker in the
    NE tournament for NCAA vs UCONN after Jim Town chokes on the 1-1 with
    UMASS up by one with seconds left and little Joey Whelton drains the
    jumper at the buzzer from the top of the circle.
    
    We anticipated the NCAA tournament for 71-72 when Al Skinner and Julius
    would play on the same team but alas Julius left early and went to the
    ABA.  Oh what could have been.....
    
    Thomas
77.1849CAM::WAYRidi pagliaccioFri Jan 05 1996 11:575
Our local newcaster on WVIT-TV30, Jerry Brooks, went to UMASS and he can barely
contain himself whenever Beasley Reece talks UMASS on Sports....


'Saw
77.1850MROA::RSCHOTTFri Jan 05 1996 12:2627
    RE: .1847
    
    Bill - Funny line about the ladies and Greg Duarte.  During '73-74, a
    group of us rented a house in South Amherst.  Bachelor pad heaven. 
    Full bar in the basement, 40' in ground pool in the backyard.  I
    remember we had a pretty nice spring during April and especially May
    of '74, and the pool saw some heavy use.  Anyway, Greg Duarte showed
    up at one of our parties, and the women were literally hanging off him!
    A couple of my roommates were Sam Malone types, but they could do
    nothing but shake their heads over Duarte.  He wasn't a bad basketball
    player either.
    
         Well enough about the glory days.  I was at the Centrum last 
    night, and came away impressed with UMass' ability to win a tough game
    over a very good opponent on a night when they clearly didn't have 
    their legs.  Padilla was severely abused by the Memphis point guard
    who seemed to blow by him whenever he wanted.  Yet Padilla played at 
    least 30 minutes, and hit the clutch free throws at the end.  Camby
    played very well despite some foul trouble (several cheapies, I
    thought), and Bright and Travieso both scored some clutch points.  I
    thought Dingle played about his worst game of the year, and neither
    Norville or Weeks contributed much off of the bench, though Rigo Nunez
    gave the team a bit of a lift.  For those wondering, Charlton Clarke
    is still in a walking cast, and his return would seem to be a couple
    of weeks away at least.
    
    Russ
77.1851proud to be a fanCNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineFri Jan 05 1996 12:2721
    
    Well in a Russell-like performance Billy Breen's mainman straps
    the Minuteman on his back and carries them to the victory. Absolutely
    fantastic game last night. The Crowd which had been a bit silent after
    the early UMASS eruption exploaded with just under 6 left in the game 
    and UMASS down 2. I've been to more than a few games in my time and
    I have never heard a crowd more vocal or substaining. Made me proud
    to be from Worcester. Memphis was quite impressive and had not been
    for the crowd UMASS probably would have went down despite the POY
    contributions of Camby. He was immense in the second half getting
    all the big buckets, boards and a couple of blocks. Marcus, I'm
    sorry I evver doubted you. 
    
    Jimbo, if Travis Knight ever has to face this guy, count it as Travis'
    last game cause he'll quit out of fustration. If he knows what good for
    him, he'll just call in sick that day.
    
    This has to be Cal's best defensive team. If they had an explosive 
    scorer they'd probably go undefeated. 
    
    mike
77.1852Change my what?AKOCOA::BREENAshes to ashes, dust to dustFri Jan 05 1996 12:2714
    What was the name of the Somerville star who played at UMass?  It may
    have been pre 1970.  Virtually all the Leaman teams were competitive
    and at that old cage were very tough - very loud home crowd.
    
    And the ncaa at 24 teams and all those conference automatics made
    qualification there very tough but resulted in a very competitive NIT
    with ACC,Big 10 and Missouri Conference runners-up along with the best
    of the East.
    
    And a paucity of tv but on the bright side none of the evils that tv
    money and methods brought to the game.  It had never occurred to the
    tv moguls that those who watched the college baskets might not watch
    ANY tv the rest of the time - the only chance to get them to change
    their beer affiliation.
77.1853MROA::RSCHOTTFri Jan 05 1996 12:313
    Re. 1852
    
    Somerville Star = Billy Endicott
77.1854BIGQ::MCKAYFri Jan 05 1996 14:3115
    Knight>Camby 'nuf said
    
    I saw the end of the game and was suprised at both teams defensive
    mistakes.  When Memphis let Bright drive in for a layup with a minute
    left uncontested I was just shaking my head.  BANG EM!
    
    I would think there would be a good chance UMASS and UCONN could meet
    this year, but both would have to make the final 8 at least if one
    of them is a 1 seed.  If one of them doesn't get a 1 they could
    meet in the 16 as 2 and 3 seeds.
    
    Big game Monday UCONN vs. Nova tune in and see what a real Center
    plays like 8*)
    
    Jimbo
77.1855MSBCS::BRYDIEPlan 9 From Outer SpaceFri Jan 05 1996 15:0111
    
      The game itself was very entertaining but the single most amazing
      thing to me was just how many good players the city of Memphis
      produces. Nine players from the current squad come from the city
      and I know that Nolan Richardson recruits heavily from Memphis.
      
    
      BTW - I've named myself president of the Rigoberto Nunez Fan Club.
            Anyone else, who is a fan of the hustling, diving, tenacious but 
            couldn't score in a cathouse with a fistful of fifties Nunez,
            can send me their annual club dues of $3,000.
77.1856USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jan 05 1996 15:239
>    This has to be Cal's best defensive team. If they had an explosive 
>    scorer they'd probably go undefeated. 

Who's going to beat them Mike ?  Temple ?

Forget about UMass and UConn meeting in the Sweet 16 or the Elite 8.
UMass is going to be #1 in the East, and UConn will be either a #2
or the best #3 (unless they completely fold, at which point who cares).
No way UConn at #2 or 3 stays in the East.  And meeting in the Final Four ?
77.1857"Memphis a real factor for March"AKOCOA::TROYSat Jan 06 1996 01:0419
    
    re: .1850
    
    Another Leamanism was on Duarte - "Greg, you've got the best body out
    there - why don't you DO something with it". My roommate was the BBall
    manager - he had a LOT of Duarte babe stories too.  
    
    re: Jim town 1-1 choke - That was the third worst sports memory for me - 
    the others being Red Sox classics with Mr. Buckner and Mr. Dent of the
    Yankees.
    
    Re: Billy Endicott -Had a Sweet J,, nice compliment at Off guard to Rick
    Pitino.  Got a coke and sandwich from the Celtics as a 8th round
    draftee, when they went that many rounds. 
    
    Last night's game showed another gutty UMASS performance - and I think
    Memphis is definitely a post-season factor - kept their composure,
    relentless defense, real speed at the guards, good leapers up front.
                                                 
77.1858USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jan 08 1996 15:014
>    Memphis is definitely a post-season factor - kept their composure,
>    relentless defense, real speed at the guards, good leapers up front.

Memphis lost to Houston AT MEMPHIS over the weekend.
77.1859"What goes down can still come back up"AKOCOA::TROYMon Jan 08 1996 16:282
    Well, Joe - looks like we sent Memphis into a FUNK. We'll see if they
    can recover - the ratings certainly punished them-  down to #13.  
77.1860ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Mon Jan 08 1996 17:084
77.1861BIGQ::MCKAYTue Jan 09 1996 11:003
    Iceman and I agree.......is this some kind of resolution Paul?????
                                                                 
    Jimbo
77.1862MSBCS::BRYDIEMy kingdom for K.Greene's locksTue Jan 09 1996 15:133
    
      Gee, I wonder where that one wacko, who kept UMass from being
      a unanimous number 1 by voting for Connecticut, comes from?
77.1863BIGQ::MCKAYTue Jan 09 1996 15:255
    I swear I do not have a vote in the AP poll!!!
    
    That guy is one smart guy though, he'll be vidicated early April.
    
    Jimbo
77.1864Loved that Somerville toughnessTNPUBS::NAZZAROThe truth - Syracuse s*cks!Tue Jan 09 1996 17:407
    Billy Endicott had three very productive seasons for UMass, but in his
    senior year in 1975, he got into the worst shooting slump I've ever
    seen.  He still hustled his butt off, but literally couldn't buy a
    basket for most of the year.  Couldn't have shot more than 20% from the
    field his senior year.
    
    NAZZ
77.1865"He DID drop off his final yeaR"AKOCOA::TROYTue Jan 09 1996 19:186
    
    Nazz - You're right, he really hit the skids in his last year.  
    He did hustle on "D" but if he shot 25% or so I wouldn't be surprised.
    
    BT
    
77.1866Maybe Bobby Knight voted for Uconn ...TLE::PHILLIPSWed Jan 10 1996 17:472
... since they blew Indiana out by over 30? But he's not a wacko, right?
77.1867Death of UMass SwimmerMROA::RSCHOTTFri Jan 12 1996 14:4914
         Very sad news regarding the UMass Swimmer, Greg Minton, who
    collapsed and died during a Swim Meet with Dartmouth on Wednesday.
    Minton had just finished (3rd I believe) a 100 meter freestyle race,
    and was sitting with his coach, Russ Yarworth, when he collapsed.
    He had competed in a 50 meter freestyle earlier in the day.
    
         Minton's last physical was in August and was completely normal.
    Drug or steroid use is not suspected as a cause of death at this time.
    
         Minton, a native of Oregon, was the only UMass Swimmer on full
    scholarship, and also competed on the UMass Water Polo team that made
    it to the Water Polo Final Four in November.
    
    Russ                 
77.1868TragicLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Jan 12 1996 15:108
      Yeah, what a bummer.  I was driving when I heard on the radio
      that he collapsed and was in the hospital and I'm thinking, "I
      hope he's going to be alright."  Shortly after, they announced
      an update and I just didn't feel good about it and they said
      he died.
    
      Man, 22 years old.
    
77.1869USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jan 12 1996 16:4619
It seems the scheduling argument is a hot topic lately.  USA Today has
an article in today's paper that says the tough scheduling approach is
obviously going to benefit UMass, but may hurt Georgia Tech.  Tech was
5-6 in pre-ACC play, having lost to some heavies and some not-so-heavies.
Last year they didn't get in the NCAA Tournament, and most cited their
weak schedule and lack of wins against quality opponents.  To try to
avoid that this year, Cremins scheduled some big boys this year, and
it's backfired on him 'cause they've lost most of those games.  It's
believed that he now has to have a real good ACC season to get into
the NCAA this year.

John Chaney, who's always scheduled tough competition for Temple, says
it doesn't work for every coach 'cause most are concerned about their
jobs.

Very few have the security Chaney enjoys.  Despite his big wins over
Kansas and Villanova, he's got a losing record, and is hoping for
a big A-10 season and consideration from the NCAA committee over his
"tough schedule".
77.1870MIMS::ROLLINS_RNW Wildcats Rose Bowl BandwagonFri Jan 12 1996 16:506
>Very few have the security Chaney enjoys.  Despite his big wins over
>Kansas and Villanova, he's got a losing record, and is hoping for
>a big A-10 season and consideration from the NCAA committee over his
>"tough schedule".

 It's a .500 record after beating Dayton last night.
77.1871Tech Over North CarolinaLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Jan 12 1996 19:193
      Georgia Tech got a big one over North Carolina in ACC play.
    
    						Tony
77.1872:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Jan 15 1996 12:315
    
    
      News Flash...
    
    Marcus Camby has been seen with Steve Howe.
77.1873Next time think before making a comment like thatTNPUBS::NAZZAROBe well, MarcusTue Jan 16 1996 13:045
    Not funny.
    
    Not funny at all.
    
    NAZZ
77.1874tests have found nothing, yetHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 16 1996 13:1718
So far, from what lastest I heard, which was on ESPN this morning, was
that they haven't found anything wrong with Marcus.

They've done brain scans, MRI, blood tests, spinal fluid tests, etc.,
etc., and all have been negative.

Certainly, any time I hear this kinda thing you think of Hank Gathers.
Here's hoping that this is not the case with Camby who so far this season
has played better'n anyone else. Unlike the faux stars, Marcus stepped
up in the big game. His efforts against Tim Duncan have to be the best
performance to date in college hoops.

Of course, I'm sure he'd rather not have to face the Wolfpack Studmain,
Todd Fuller, again ;-).

Here's to many more great games, Marcus.

TTom
77.1875out 2 weeks ...TLE::PHILLIPSTue Jan 16 1996 14:112
I heard on the radio he'll not play for at least 2 weeks.
77.1876SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jan 16 1996 14:5216
  He had some preliminary tests in the Hospital in New York and while they came
out OK they were not that extensive. Now he's at the Medical center in Worster
where he'll have a much more extensive work up.

  The 2 week thing is a guess. He fells he's ready to play now, the doctors
like to have him sit out as long as it takes and the coach is saying his health
comes 1st.

  The Press seems to have invented the 2 week number. Last night one station
was saying that the last time something like this happened at UMASS the guy
was out 2 weeks and by this morning they had just shortened it to saying 2
weeks. At that time no doctor or coach was using any time limit.

  Hope it's not a Reggie Louis type thing.

  George
77.1877MROA::RSCHOTTTue Jan 16 1996 14:5611
         Even though the tests so far haven't turned up anything
    serious, the thing that has everyone concerned is the fact that he
    was nonresponsive for 10 minutes.  One medical commentary that I
    heard stated that an average fainting situation typically lasts
    from 10 seconds to two minutes.
    
         The two week estimate, is based largely on the Mike Williams
    scenario from two season's ago.  Again however, Williams' fainting
    spell lasted a matter of seconds, and not 10 minutes.
    
    Russ
77.1878CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downTue Jan 16 1996 14:587
Maybe he was having a bitchin' dream about a nude Dana Delaney in that movie
TTom mentioned.

I'd be out for a HOUR if that was me!


'Saw
77.1879CNTROL::CHILDSWashing MachineTue Jan 16 1996 15:344
    
    agreed Saw cause in Exit to Eden, Dana was to die for........
    
    ;^)
77.1880IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Jan 16 1996 16:291
I think she's to die for even in combat fatigues...
77.1881UMass moves to 15-0TNPUBS::NAZZAROBe well, MarcusThu Jan 18 1996 16:408
    Back to the Minutemen.  Nice win lasted night at home over a very good
    URI team.  Tyson Wheeler is a terrific point guard, but Carmelo
    Travieso completely shut him down in the second half, and Donta Bright
    was unstoppable offensively with a career high 32 points.  The Mullins
    Center was packed as usual and pretty loud, considering that most of
    the students weren't there due to intersession.
    
    NAZZ
77.1882WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Jan 18 1996 16:533
    
    URI sure is posting some excellent losses (tm).
    
77.1883Oh, that's right, there's a movie theatre in townAKOCOA::BREENThu Jan 18 1996 16:566
    the students weren't there due to intersession.
                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Where were they at Medjagorie?   What do UMass students do when there
    aren't any neat aggie fairs to go to?  Of course there's that husbandry
    depending on the mood of the sheep.
77.1884URI could be the A-10's 5th team in the NCAA tourneyTNPUBS::NAZZAROBe well, MarcusThu Jan 18 1996 16:574
    Rhode Island is now 9-5 (1-2 in the A-10).  They are ranked 54th in the
    latest Sagarin rankings.
    
    NAZZ
77.1885MROA::RSCHOTTThu Jan 18 1996 17:458
         I'd say URI is one decent big man and a little bit of maturity away 
    from being a very good team.  I know John Calipari (and I dare say
    Jimmy Calhoun) would find space in a hurry on the roster for Tyson
    Wheeler and Antonio Reynolds!
    
    Russ
    
    - Charlton Clarke Watch - Day 51
77.1886Charlton Clarke = any day nowWRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatThu Jan 18 1996 18:187
RE:     - Charlton Clarke Watch - Day 51

Clarke was in full uniform last night and participated in the warmups. To my 
untrained eyes (and my seats high up in the nosebleed section), he looked like
he isn't far from returning.

Chris
77.1887Camby cleared to playMOVMON::DAVISThu Jan 18 1996 19:513
    ESPNet SportZone is reporting that Marcus Camby has been cleared to
    play.  Calipari says Marcus will play when he's up to it, maybe sit "a
    game or two or three."
77.1888Duquesne/PittsburgMROA::RSCHOTTMon Jan 22 1996 15:4322
         The Camby-less Minutemen played a pretty strange game against
    Duquesne on Saturday.  After an uninspired first half, they take a two
    point lead to the locker room.  They come out in the second half, and
    play 10 minutes where every shot they throw up goes in and they play pretty
    fair defense as well, and they take a 19 point lead.  Then they get in a
    bit of foul trouble, and Duquesne scores on nearly every possession
    down the stretch (many, many uncontested layups) to make a game out of
    it.  During this run, not a single UMass front court player was willing
    to help out, or step in to take a charge.  Calipari must have been very
    unhappy with this segment of the game.
    
         For UMass, Carmelo Travieso had a career game on the offensive end
    hitting 7 out of 8 treys.  Padilla also had a good offensive game,
    coming close to a triple double.  As a pair however, they played by far
    their worst defensive game of the year.  On a positive note, Charlton
    Clarke finally got his first playing time since the Kentucky game. 
    He'll be a help down the road.
    
         Tuesday night the UM'ies meet Pittsburg.  I think we'll definitely
    see Marcus Camby in this one.
    
    Russ
77.1889USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jan 22 1996 17:0710
>         Tuesday night the UM'ies meet Pittsburg.  I think we'll definitely
>    see Marcus Camby in this one.

What happened to the 2-3 weeks of rest ?

And what is Calipari trying to do with his "it's Marcus' decision" stuff ?
If it was Marcus' decision he would have played the 1st game after his
hospital stay, if you believe what the kid is saying.

Was coach Cal on the bench Sat, or back at the hotel with Marcus ???   :^)
77.1890SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Mon Jan 22 1996 18:358
    
    	Marcus did not make the trip for Saturday's game. He was still
    on a 24/48 brain wave monitoring device. This device was removed
    on Saturday. The announcers for Saturday's game said that Marcus might
    play during the second half. So Marcus could have flew down Saturday
    and didn't get there in enough time.
    
    Ron
77.1891I don't get itTNPUBS::NAZZAROBe well, MarcusTue Jan 23 1996 16:308
    Marcus actually arrived about 20 minutes before the start of the game,
    but elected to stay in the hotel and watch the game on TV.  Since
    Marcus has been cleared by the medical staff, it is obviously his
    decision when he feels ready to resume play.  What do you expect
    Calipari to do - demand he start tonight, or else???  Or make him rest
    until the A-10 tourney?  
    
    NAZZ
77.1892USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jan 23 1996 18:167
>    decision when he feels ready to resume play.  What do you expect
>    Calipari to do - demand he start tonight, or else???  Or make him rest
>    until the A-10 tourney?  

I'm sure I saw a TV news interview last week where Camby said he couldn't
wait to get back on the floor.  Don't have any idea what happened Saturday
to change his mind.
77.1893Doctors had to give OK firstTNPUBS::NAZZAROBe well, MarcusTue Jan 23 1996 18:298
    As far as I know, nothing has changed his mind.  He diodn't get the
    final OK from the medical staff to play until Sunday.  And Calipari has
    said all along that once he received medical clearance for Marcus to
    play, then it was going to be up to Camby to tell him when he was
    ready.  I expect Marcus won't start, but he will get 20-25 minutes
    tonight.
    
    NAZZ
77.1894Umass beat PittTLE::PHILLIPSWed Jan 24 1996 12:133
fyi, Umass beat Pitt last night, Something like 79-71 in overtime. Camby did not
play, but he was suited up and on the bench.
77.1895WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jan 24 1996 12:173
    
    
      Nice traveling call in OT.
77.1896USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jan 24 1996 12:227
>fyi, Umass beat Pitt last night, Something like 79-71 in overtime.
>Camby did not play, but he was suited up and on the bench.

Does anyone know what's going on here ??  Calipari says all tests prove
he's 100% fine, but says it's Marcus' decision.  Camby (last week) says
he can't wait to play again.  Marcus sits, in uniform, the whole game.
If I were a member of the press, I'd have all kinds of questions....
77.1897one possibilityMROA::RSCHOTTWed Jan 24 1996 13:0321
    RE: .1896
    
    Joe - One possibility is that, despite statements to the contrary, both
    Calipari and Camby are going to be a bit gun-shy, when Marcus finally
    sets foot back on the court.  Last night's game was one that Calipari
    really wanted to win ..... its Pitt, his former employer, its the Big
    East, etc.  Putting Marcus in would be a distraction for everyone, for
    Calipari's coaching and for the team.  And how much do you want to bet
    that we see a tentative Marcus Camby for awhile.  Not the guy that 
    blocks a shot, and then beats the guards down the court to finish!
    
    The next two games are at Mullins, and there will be the opportunity
    for some full fledged practice time before and in between.  My guess
    is that Calipari will ease Marcus back with limited PT in both games.
    Temple in Philly on February 1st will be another story.
    
    Russ
    
    - How about Carmelo Travieso .... back to back 33 and 27 pt. games!
      He must like those Pittsburg rims!
                                        
77.1898STRATA::BARBIERIWed Jan 24 1996 13:432
      I think Calipari wants Marcus to have a solid practise before
      an actual game.
77.1899Calipari has always put player first, winning secondTNPUBS::NAZZAROBe well, MarcusWed Jan 24 1996 13:598
    According to the article I read in the Globe, Marcus Couldn't quite get
    loose in warmups, and Calipari decided it wasn't worth the risk to play
    him.
    
    But I wonder how big the temptation was, with Norville fouled out and
    Weeks and Dingle with four, to start Camby in the OT?
    
    NAZZ
77.1900MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Jan 24 1996 14:468
    
       There's no rush to bring Camby back because one loss at 
      this point is essentially meaningless. In the interim, Norville
      gets ten times as much playing time as he normally would, other
      players (read:Traveiso, Weeks) have an opporunity to stand up and 
      be counted and the general confidence level of the team soars.
      This team will be a much better squad for Marcus' brief absence 
      though they won't go far in the tourney without him. 
77.1901Now to the bunkerAKOCOA::BREENWed Jan 24 1996 14:527
    >they won't go far in the tourney without him (Marcus Camby)
    
    Oh it's so hard not to bring up that Okla state game and those bogus
    second half fouls which did remove him and finally UMass ...
    
    But I won't because the cat with the hat will be all over me
    
77.1902WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Jan 24 1996 14:553
    
    
      Cat with the Hat??
77.1903USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Jan 24 1996 14:5521
>    But I wonder how big the temptation was, with Norville fouled out and
>    Weeks and Dingle with four, to start Camby in the OT?

I doubt very much at all.  At that point of the game he would more likely
hurt the team than help it.  If he wasn't "loose" in warmups, what condition
was he in after sitting for 2 hours ?

I wonder what he couldn't get "loose" during warmups ?  I tend to think
you may be right Russ...Camby may be nervous.  I know I would be...having
blacked-out for 10 minutes and no one knows why.  I'd bet that the
Gathers' incident is in the back of Calipari's mind too.  Maybe he
didn't want his 1st game back on national TV.  Nazz, just what is
Calipari protecting him from, given the doctors' clean bill of health ?
Despite statements to the contrary, it appears both Camby and Calipari
are concerned.


Did anyone hear McDonough's report that Calipari is trying to sell
Camby on staying for his senior season ?  That with some "true center"
coming on board next year, he'll get to play forward (his most likely
position in the NBA).
77.1904Us with youn'uns use a lot of kid stuffAKOCOA::BREENWed Jan 24 1996 15:143
    Chappy I'm mixing up Dr Seuss and "bitch'n ball caps".  He'll be back
    from lunch (the former 'eer) to roast me for bringing up the UM-OSU
    game for the 90th time.
77.1905"'eer" ???!!! Now you've gone too far...IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Jan 24 1996 15:3513
Nope, I was eating lunch at my desk, and was ready to not say a thing because
of the incessant whining that would ensue.  However, calling me a former
'eer was going too far - I'm a Syracuse grad.  Better be careful, grandpa -
you're starting to confuse me and TTom.

Of course, the BC folk think nothing exists west of Chestnut Hill.

Think a little bit, Bill.  If you didn't bring something up for the 90th time,
I wouldn't be tempted to roast you for bringing it up the 90th time.

Cat and the Hat doesn't get read yet at my house.  "Go Dog, Go!" is the most
popular tome at the current time.
77.1906It was a compliment, I think...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThe Immaculate DeflectionWed Jan 24 1996 15:466
    Every single time in every single sport, I'll root for the 'eers 
    over 'cuse ...
    
    
    glenn
77.1907IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Jan 24 1996 15:471
Well, that's because you're a dumb ole Okie...
77.1908Cross-breeding that'll make your skin crawl...EDWIN::WAUGAMANThe Immaculate DeflectionWed Jan 24 1996 15:498
> Well, that's because you're a dumb ole Okie...
    
    Dumb ol' Okie originally borned not too far 'way from West Virginny...
    
    
    glenn
    
77.1909CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downWed Jan 24 1996 15:5010
|              -< Cross-breeding that'll make your skin crawl... >-
|
|
|> Well, that's because you're a dumb ole Okie...
|    
|    Dumb ol' Okie originally borned not too far 'way from West Virginny...
    

Which by any other name spells Hick.  8^)    

77.1910IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Jan 24 1996 15:533
>    Dumb ol' Okie originally borned not too far 'way from West Virginny...

Throw in a stint in Arkansas, and I think you've got all bases covered...
77.1911McDonough's scoopMROA::RSCHOTTWed Jan 24 1996 16:0119
         Marcus has dropped plenty of hints that he's at least thinking
    about sticking around for his senior season.  First of all, everyone
    associated with the basketball team have been very impressed with the
    informal workouts and the pickup games that Prop 48 casualty, Lari Ketner
    has participated in.  He was POY in the City of Philadelphia last year,
    and at 6'10" and 270 lbs. he has true center dimensions.  I read a
    quote in early October from Camby, to the effect that he'd love the
    opportunity to play with Ketner.
    
         Secondly, just this past week I read a story on ESPNnet that
    reported that Camby had promised his mother that he would get his
    degree.  The implication was that he would get the degree by the time
    he was 22 and not when he is 40.
    
         Having said all that, provided that he healthy, I think he's going
    to get a lot of pressure to declare for the draft after this season,
    and that the money will be tough to pass up.
    
    Russ
77.1912IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Jan 24 1996 16:023
>McDonough's scoop

If you mean Will, these terms are mutually exclusive.
77.1913AKOCOA::BREENWed Jan 24 1996 18:0317
    Roland it may be age but I meant the 'eer formerly known as not former
    'eer.  Not mountaineer,rambling wreck or even eagle.
    
    We did the Seuss ages 2-5 or before Nintendo.  Knowing my son I should
    read him from the collected works of Tark or Trump or similar edge
    experts.  Or Lombardi since for Phil winning is the only thing.
    
    I found another 'ear' for my Camby got screwed vitriolic so you'll
    probably get spared at least till the tourney.  I have reversed a bit
    and feel Camby might just as well stay the route and very well might -
    I don't think he's one of those that will be hurt by staying.
    
    	Perhaps the identity of the top teams drafting will be the clue -
    perhaps a package deal of Coach Cal and Camby to the Celtics if they
    were near the top.  After all if he declares but states right situation
    only (eg Celtics) and has the fallback of senior year then perhaps he
    could pull it off.
77.1914That Would StinkLUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Jan 24 1996 18:279
      re -1
    
      If he did that, that would totally stink.  Not everyone is a
      Celtics fan.  The preferential treatment of any single team
      being able to land a big man on the basis of sabotage ("I
      might decide to stay another year so you might as well let
      me be a Celtic") reeks regardless of who that team is.
    
    						Tony
77.1915Maybe I just want to see Camby become a CelticAKOCOA::BREENWed Jan 24 1996 18:419
    Why, Camby isn't a member of the union and has no pact with the nba. 
    From his or any other college player he starts with the same rights as
    a top software engineer who plays the top houses against each other. 
    Just because the current mlb players and management have decided what's
    best for them has no ethical bearing on what's best for Marcus.
    
    Given that, A lesser talent would be unwise to adopt this strategy since
    pro teams cannot be trusted not to punish a player for not "playing
    ball".
77.1916ROCK::GRONOWSKII've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!Wed Jan 24 1996 20:203
77.1917CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downThu Jan 25 1996 10:3711
>    experts.  Or Lombardi since for Phil winning is the only thing.
    
Read him _Run_To_Daylight_.  It contains some good principles for a successful
life, or a successful business.

If you're done with _Cat_In_The_Hat_ I've heard Donta Bright could use a copy.


'Saw


77.1918SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jan 25 1996 11:2816
RE<<< Note 77.1916 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!" >>>

>    I'm just glad that George isn't on this bandwagon...!
    
  I went to UMASS and while I was there I went to some of the football games
but I'm just not a college basketball fan.

  It's fun listening to Patty's kids when they come over and talk about seeing
Camby on campus just like it was fun years ago listening to friends talk about
going to see Julius Erving but personally I just can't get all that ramped up
about minor league basketball.

  It will be fun, however, to see how Camby does when he gets to the big
leagues. 

  George
77.1919Run To Daylight/I'll Take The 'Minors'LUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Jan 25 1996 11:4329
      re: .1917
    
      I have had Run to Daylight for over 25 years.  I just read it 
      in the past year.  Excellent book.  What I gained most from
      the book was Lombardi's ability to know the psychology of all
      of his players and his corresponding ability to handle each
      player as seemed best.  He knew people and he knew how to
      motivate people.
    
      By the way, was it apparent to you what team the Packers were
      preparing for?  I thought the Packer's concern over a certain
      defensive tackle and defensive back made it obvious.  Who do
      you think the team was?
    
    re: .1918
    
      There is a growing sentiment that 'major' league basketball
      is a waste of time.  The talent level certainly is not as high,
      but give me the college game any day.  I don't think I'm alone
      on this.  I think part of it has to do with some of the contracts
      players are asking for.  There is more to the game than how well
      one may play it.
    
      I don't know why Willis Reed comes to mind, but his heart would
      put so many of these self-proclaimed prima donnas to shame.
    
      I have little use for the NBA!  Give me the minors!
    
    						Tony
77.1920CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downThu Jan 25 1996 11:4932
>      I have had Run to Daylight for over 25 years.  I just read it 
>      in the past year.  Excellent book.  What I gained most from
>      the book was Lombardi's ability to know the psychology of all
>      of his players and his corresponding ability to handle each
>      player as seemed best.  He knew people and he knew how to
>      motivate people.

Most, and by that I mean a high percentage, of his players went on to
have very successful lives in business.  To a man, they attribute that
to the lessons learned under Lombardi.


>      By the way, was it apparent to you what team the Packers were
>      preparing for?  I thought the Packer's concern over a certain
>      defensive tackle and defensive back made it obvious.  Who do
>      you think the team was?

If memory serves me correct, it was Detroit I believe.  But actually I know
that because my edition was a later edition.  For clarity, and because all of
the players at that point were retired, names were used instead of referring to
them by number.  There was a big editor's note in the beginning.


    
As to basketball, it just never really reached out and grabbed me the way
football, baseball, or hockey have.  

Given a choice, I like the college game better than the pros.  The college game
is less like the WWF than the pros.


'Saw
77.1921IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Jan 25 1996 12:0010
>      I don't know why Willis Reed comes to mind, but his heart would
>      put so many of these self-proclaimed prima donnas to shame.

Willis Reed comes to mind because he gave his all for the team, probably at
the expense of his career.  The fact that it was against the Wilt-er was
just icing on the cake.

I've never heard a tape of it, but supposedly the roar when he entered the
arena was of legendary proportions, and the Knicks were so jacked up that they
just took it straight to the Lakers...
77.1922SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jan 25 1996 12:0123
RE                    <<< Note 77.1919 by LUDWIG::BARBIERI >>>

>      There is a growing sentiment that 'major' league basketball
>      is a waste of time.  The talent level certainly is not as high,
>      but give me the college game any day.  I don't think I'm alone
>      on this.  I think part of it has to do with some of the contracts
>      players are asking for.  There is more to the game than how well
>      one may play it.
    
  I guess it depends on what interests you. I've said many times that when
I'm watching a game I could care less about the financial deal a player's
manager has cooked up with the team in the off season.

  If there's one thing the Dream Team (the real one, not the lawyers) proved
to the world it is that no basketball team on the planet comes anywhere close
to the quality of play in the NBA, particularly on defense.

  During the Olympics hardly any teams scored much more than mid 40s against
the NBA players from the U.S. even though they knew the only thing they would
see would be man to man. As one of the Italian players said, it was basically a
spectacle. Those NBA guys turned the Olympics into a clinic. 

  George
77.1923CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downThu Jan 25 1996 12:199
>I've never heard a tape of it, but supposedly the roar when he entered the
>arena was of legendary proportions, and the Knicks were so jacked up that they
>just took it straight to the Lakers...

I've seen videotape.

Never been a Knicks fan AT ALL, but I still got a chill when I saw it.
It was something to behold.

77.1924college rules pros droolCNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Thu Jan 25 1996 12:3612
    
    The prefernce for the college game is that they tend to call the came
    purer (ie: travelling, 3 seconds and offensive fouls come to mind).
    It's more of a team game and there isn't a pecking order by how big
    your star power is although this one is unfortunately developing in the
    college game. The pros are more of a one on one league.
    
    I definately prefer the college game. Especailly if you toss in the
    atmosphere because the fans art college games are definately more
    jacked than the pros...
    
    mike
77.1925College Bball=minor league just boils meAKOCOA::BREENThu Jan 25 1996 14:0514
    George I am one person who totally understands where you're coming from
    on your Atlanta - Boston Braves things, I have friends and family
    just like you except they truly were Boston Braves fans and get a wispy
    look when the name Sibby Sisti comes up and downright fractious on the
    topic of Tommy Holmes.
    
    But this college basketball = minor league thing which I assume you say
    the same for college football totally blows you away as any type of
    fan.  Especially someone like you who calls it a diversion.  Minor
    league baseball is truly doing the same thing as major league and you
    can see the path upwards between the two sports but any fool should be
    able to see the college talents of a Damon Stoudamire don't suddenly
    blossom in 6 months but rather the style of play allows him show the
    talent he already had.
77.1926LombardiLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Jan 25 1996 14:1723
      re: .1920
    
      Yeah, it was the Lions.  They were rather concerned with Alex
      Karras and Dick "Night Train" Lane as well as with Roger Brown
      (who was a huge DL especially for that day).
    
      I verified that it was the Lions by looking at the Packer games
      that season and checking for the Bear game which they made note
      of (the game previous).
    
      I've been glancing through Kramer's book Lombardi.  The effect he
      had on the players was immense.  Willie Davis gave a sales speech
      that so motivated his employees that some came up and said it was
      the most motivating thing they had every heard.  He said he learned
      it all from Lombardi.
    
      In that Ice Bowl game, they said that he showed virtually no signs
      of being effected by the cold.  The players were amazed.
    
      I digress as this isn't about UMass, but what the hey, its nice
      conversation!
    
    						Tony
77.1927CAM::WAYDress to the right and cover downThu Jan 25 1996 14:1917
>      Yeah, it was the Lions.  They were rather concerned with Alex
>      Karras and Dick "Night Train" Lane as well as with Roger Brown
>      (who was a huge DL especially for that day).
    
Yep.

"Night Train" Lane got his nickname because he'd been married to
Dinah Washington (I believe) and he played her "Night Train" recording
a lot.  I think I read that in _Paper_Lion_....


This doesn't have much to do with UMASS I admit....


'Saw


77.1928SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jan 25 1996 14:3324
RE                      <<< Note 77.1925 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>

>    Minor
>    league baseball is truly doing the same thing as major league and you
>    can see the path upwards between the two sports but any fool should be
>    able to see the college talents of a Damon Stoudamire don't suddenly
>    blossom in 6 months but rather the style of play allows him show the
>    talent he already had.

  Ok, maybe I don't understand.

  If the talent in college is just as good as the NBA, and college does nothing
to help develop a player for the NBA, why doesn't everyone go straight from
highschool to the NBA? Is there a minimum age limit or college requirement for
the NBA? If so, why?

  Seems if kids highschool grads were good enough for the NBA they would just
go to the NBA, earn big bucks, save up, and then go to college for an education
after they retired from the NBA if they were so inclined.

  But if they are not ready for the NBA and if spending time playing college
helps them to develop for the NBA then college is like a minor league.

  George
77.1929MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Jan 25 1996 14:502
    
       This little discussion has nothing to do with UMass.
77.1930SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jan 25 1996 14:589
  Well yes and no. It started because Paul asked me if I was on the UMASS
bandwagon. I said no that even though I went to UMASS I wasn't on their
bandwagon because I didn't follow College Basketball. Then I said why and
we went from there.

  I have no problem moving the discussion somewhere else or not having it
at all depending on what other people want.

  George
77.1931MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Jan 25 1996 15:053
    
      The discussion has its merits but it probably belongs in the
     College basketball note.
77.1932Saw That Cinci LostLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Jan 26 1996 11:292
      I noticed that Cincinatti lost a game.  Who'd they lose
      to???
77.1933CNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Fri Jan 26 1996 11:522
    
    UAB. and Depaul almost took them out last night
77.1934CNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Fri Jan 26 1996 11:5615
    
    Well Temple does the A-10 proud on one hand and throw dirt on them with
    the other. Temple beat Duke last night hoorary hoorary!!! 
    
    The dirt was a cheap shot by Jackson to Newton. Jackson hit Newton from
    behinbd with a forearm shiver to base of the head/neck. It was nasty
    and knocked Newton out cold for a minute or so. Fortunately Newton did
    make it back into the ballgame. Remind me of Parrish's takedown of
    Lambieer and ruined what had been a fine game. Especially because
    Temple had just come from 10 down to take the lead....
    
    Also in A-10 George Washington knocks of Virgina Tech. So much for
    them in the top 10.........
    
    mike
77.1935TempleSTRATA::BARBIERIFri Jan 26 1996 12:3724
      I saw some of the Temple game and isn't Chaney something else?
      That technical on him and he looked like a total madman!
    
      Man, Temple is a real icon in college basketball, imo.  That
      defense they play.  I wonder what percentage of their opponent's
      shots are from the outside?  Plus having a small university right
      in the middle of Philadelphia.
    
      I still remember that #1 ranked Temple team.  Beautiful chemistry,
      but absolutely no depth.  They got knocked out by Duke on, I believe
      a Laetner last second shot.
    
      Who was their starting five?
    
      Macon,Vreeswyk (sp?),Rivas...nice team.  I wish they had won it
      all.
    
      Speaking of Cinci, I saw a quick play where Fortson grabbed a rebound
      and laid it in.  He's a load.  Would sure have looked nice in a
      UMass uniform.
    
    							Tony
      
                    
77.1936the 2 remaining Templs startersWRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatFri Jan 26 1996 12:569
RE: -1

>      Who was their starting five?
>    
>      Macon,Vreeswyk (sp?),Rivas...nice team.  I wish they had won it
>      all.


Temple also had Howard Evans and Tim Perry in this starting five.
77.1937MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Jan 26 1996 12:5916
    
   >> The dirt was a cheap shot by Jackson to Newton. Jackson hit Newton from
   >> behinbd with a forearm shiver to base of the head/neck. It was nasty
   >> and knocked Newton out cold for a minute or so. 
    
      I watched this game as well. Someone somewhere should penalize
      Jackson for what he pulled. It was worse than Parish's assault
      of Laimbeer in that it appeared to be totally unprovoked and
      Newton never saw it coming. Jackson came off looking like a real 
      punk. Aside from that, Temple's front court looks like they could
      give UMass amnd Camby a good go because them boys is big and beefy 
      and Temple plays the kind of tough defense that you expect from 
      Chaney's teams. 
      
      BTW - Chaney still looks like he hasn't had a good night's sleep
            since the Nixon administration.
77.1938IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Jan 26 1996 13:005
>      BTW - Chaney still looks like he hasn't had a good night's sleep
>            since the Nixon administration.

I saw a piece on TV that showed the first Temple practice of the day starting
at 5:00 am...
77.1939CNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Fri Jan 26 1996 13:0513
    
    Agreed Tommy. It just made no sense at all because Temple had taken
    the lead had the momentum and the crowd in their favor. Who would
    handle such a penality? The NCAA? If it had been a conference game then
    the A-10 committee could probably enforce a penality but with be a non
    conference game they probably wouldn't want to get involved. If they 
    did though and did the right thing it would certainly reflect well on
    them. Given that Temple has also knocked off Kansas and Nova, you got
    to figure they'll take down UMASS as well. They really play excellent
    against the big guns. Travesio and Padilla will  have to be on fire 
    from the outside for sure........
    
     mike
77.1940Temple - UMass always a must seeAKOCOA::BREENFri Jan 26 1996 14:1713
    Well it looks like John Chaney has a real dilemma coming off of Bobby
    Knights action with Wilkerson.  I would think violence is violence.
    
    I didn't stay with the game and when Phil finally got to bed game #2
    was on.  I sort of saw it coming, part of why I'd have liked to see
    just what Jackson,Partee etal were going to do about Newton who wasn't
    backing down like he was supposed to.
    
    UMass has its Weeks and Norville and Dingle and Bright will spend
    plenty of time at the foul line and of course if Camby is ok that's
    enough of a difference this side of the Bulls.
    
    What was it that Maple Leaf owner said about violence in sport?
77.1941USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Jan 26 1996 16:491
Who has Temple lost to this year ?
77.1942WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Jan 26 1996 17:563
    
    
       Da Hoyas!!
77.1943SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Fri Jan 26 1996 18:173
    re .1941,
    
    	Anybody not ranked.
77.1944Temple's RecordMROA::RSCHOTTFri Jan 26 1996 18:217
         Temple has lost to Wisconsin, Tulsa, Cincinnati, Memphis St.,
    Oklahoma St. and Tulane.
    
         The Owls have beaten Rider, Villanova, Kansas, St.Bonaventure,
    Xavier, Dayton, Duquesne, Fordham, Lasalle and Duke.
    
    Russ
77.1945Triumphant return for MarcusTNPUBS::NAZZAROBe well, MarcusMon Jan 29 1996 15:358
    Congrats to Marcus Camby for a hallacious comeback Saturday at the
    Mullins Center.  All Marcus did in 26 minutes was go 6-8 from the
    field, 7-8 from the line, grab 7 rebounds, and tie a school record with
    9 blocked shots!!!!!  And he had a smile on his face for most of the
    game that was wonderful to see.  UMass is once again a favorite to go
    to the Final Four, thanks to Marcus Camby.
    
    NAZZ
77.1946CAM::WAYWhen can their glory fade?Mon Jan 29 1996 15:414
His "fainting spell" was probably just a publicity stunt.


'Saw_for_ACC_Chris
77.1947BIGQ::MCKAYMon Jan 29 1996 16:135
    Nazz even you have to admit Marcus and his punch towards the floor
    and then give the first down sign is a bit ridiculous....A lot
    of class.....
    
    Jimbo
77.1948Practice fundamentals, not celebrationsILBBAK::SILVESTRISoar with the Eagles!Mon Jan 29 1996 17:1913
>>    Nazz even you have to admit Marcus and his punch towards the floor
>>    and then give the first down sign is a bit ridiculous....A lot
>>    of class.....
    
	... and in the post game interview Marcus stated that he got
	that "move" from Shawn Kemp ... don't you just love what today's
	NBA players are teaching the next generation of bball players? :-)

	... instead of watching the NBAers to learn the pick 'n roll or 
	a good jump shot, younger players are learning how to celebrate
	after a dunk or rejection ...

	Vinny
77.1949SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jan 29 1996 17:279
  It never ceases to amaze me how much people hate it when athletes celebrate.
No doubt many of you will become Spock's Sprockets fans once we encounter the
Vulcans out in Federation space. 

  "It appears that we have scored a goal Captain".

  "Indeed we have".

  George
77.1950USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Jan 29 1996 17:467
re:  -1

It's all about sportsmanship, George.  Something today's young athlete is
lacking, most of the time.


Hey Nazz, what was that team bunny-hop-thing during introductions all about ???
77.1951CAM::WAYWhen can their glory fade?Mon Jan 29 1996 17:5312
I guess I've always been partial to the let your playin' do the talkin'.

I can see it, I suppose, it if it something huge, like a goal in a soccer
game, or the upraised sticks or quick fist pump in a hockey game, perhaps.

I just can't see a lot of the crap that a lot of them do today.  What's the
point.  Celebrate when you win.

Otherwise, it's just an attempt to draw attention to oneself, and I prefer
modesty to bragadaccio anyday....

'Saw
77.1952SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jan 29 1996 18:0620
  "Well Mr Spock, these games on Vulcan are sure quiet. You just went through
three of our defenders to score that goal, aren't you just a bit excited"?

  "Most pleased Captain, I consider it a worthy accomplishment".

  "Well what about a 'yippee' or something, you've earned it".

  "'yippee'? I am not familiar with that expression."

  "It's an expression of enthusiasm. Don't you feel you should celebrate?".

  "That would be somewhat premature, the goal may not be decisive. Statistics
show that a lead of this size only results in victory 62.303598274968% of the
time. I don't feel that celebration at this point would be logical." 

  "No I don't suppose you would. Ready for my serve".

  "I have been for quite some time".

  George
77.1953Perhaps this should be in the boxing noteAKOCOA::BREENYou could see that he truly did love the MademoiselleMon Jan 29 1996 18:248
    'Saw my favorite athlete was your former Giant tight-end from our north
    shore who never displayed any emotion whatsoever on the field - whether
    scoring a td or getting blasted after a catch.  Can never recall his
    name and his brother played linebacker for Parcells last year.
    
    Couldn't recall Robert Goulet's name yesterday when the subject of
    Vanessa lip synching the national anthem came up - you know why, of
    course, I'd be recalling Goulet.
77.1954just joshin' yaCNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Mon Jan 29 1996 18:347
    
    Mark Bavaro....
    
    Geez Saw if'n you're into modesty instead of braggacido why not use a
    simple 10 cent word like showoff instead of braggacido????
    
    ;^) 
77.1955CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Jan 29 1996 18:3711
  I guess I don't see the difference. When soccer players sprint after a goal
with their fists in the air or hockey players pump their stick after a goal it
seems no different than someone dancing in the endzone or guys piling up after
a big win. It's all celebration and it's all of statement of "yeah for us, we
won, someone else lost". 

  Is the difference the number of goals scored? If so then a touchdown is
not all that common. You get about as many of those in a game as you get
goals in a hockey game.

  George
77.1956CNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Mon Jan 29 1996 18:508
    
    I have no problems with them celebrating after scores although I do
    prefer the Barry Sanders approach, it's when a guy catch a 5 yard
    square out or breaks up a pass play, or makes a helacious hit and they
    start to act like it's the end of the world. That bugs me especially
    when you consider that's their job that's what they get paid to do...
    
    mike
77.1957Celebrating is good; taunting is badTNPUBS::NAZZAROMarcus is back!Tue Jan 30 1996 14:1816
    As we are all human beings and not robots, we each have a different
    mentality regarding all things in life, including celebrations.  What
    is appropriate for Barry Sanders is not for Deion Sanders.  However, I
    draw the line when celebration becomes taunting.  Fortunately, the
    NCAA, in one of the few good moves it has made in recent memory, has
    provided officials with the authority to give a technical foul to a 
    player who gets in an opponent's face, and I've seen at least three
    taunting technicals this year.  Maybe the technical will help players
    and coaches understand the difference between celebration and taunting.
    
    Re. the "bunny hop" = UMass has been doing that all year.  The players
    start to bounce up and down as soon as the last starter is introduced
    (usually Marcus).  Then they continue to bounce together into a big
    grouping with everyone joining together and raising a hand high.
    
    NAZZ
77.1958hey, I need something in college hoops to get emotional aboutUSCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jan 30 1996 14:504
BUNNY-HOPPING, "REFUSE TO LOSE", Camby girations, Coach Cal the slickster,
McDonough's "TRAVIEEEESO"...

This program grates on me this year.
77.1959Camby headed toward NaismithHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 30 1996 15:2010
Right now, ol' Marcus Camby is the leading vote getter for the Naismath
award.

In a survey of 75 Div I Sports Info Directors, Camby received 35% of the
vote. The others to 5, at this point: Tim Duncan, Ray Allen, Allen
Iverson and Kerry Kittles in that order.

FWIW, Duncan, Allen and Kittles were all firsted team pre-season AAs.

TTom
77.1960BIGQ::MCKAYTue Jan 30 1996 15:487
    Camby has squat for numbers.  No way does he deserve player
    of the year.  The first team big east squad probably all have better
    numbers than Camby......
    
    Of course Camby has some cupcakes coming up in the A-10 schedule....
    
    Jimbo
77.1961big in big gamesHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 30 1996 15:527
Except for one thing, Jimbo.

In all the big games Camby was The Man. His efforts against Kentucky and
Wake are still vivid. IMHO, they were 2 of the bestest games anyone has
had thised year.

TTom
77.1962BIGQ::MCKAYTue Jan 30 1996 15:559
    2 games big deal, we're talking player of the year.  Camby may
    have outplayed Duncan but a best game of the year?  You best look
    up the stats, Camby shot like 25% from the floor and had 20 or
    22 points.....
    
    His best game of the year was the 38 point effort against some
    cupcake....
    
    Jimbo
77.1963And it's not even closeTNPUBS::NAZZAROMarcus is back!Tue Jan 30 1996 16:1610
    You know, this is really too easy.  I was tempted to ignore the
    suffering of fools, but I just cain't resist.
    
    Camby is averaging 19.5 ppg, 8 rpg, and 3 blocks.  He has played his best
    against the best, such as Kentucky and Memphis, and has played better
    than such All-Americans as Duncan and Wallace in head to head matchups.
    His team has played the toughest non-conference schedule in the country
    and they are undefeated
    
    NAZZ.
77.1964what he said @+)HBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedTue Jan 30 1996 16:230
77.1965USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Jan 30 1996 16:4710
>    and has played better
>    than such All-Americans as Duncan and Wallace in head to head matchups.

Come again ?  While it's flattering to hear of a lowly Syracuse player
mentioned in comparison to the 2nd coming of Bill Russell (who's playing
for a team that's going to have an undefeated regular season), the
comparison just can't be made.  Wallace's supporting cast is equal to
UMass' 2nd team.  When the two schools played each other, he held his own,
considering.  And I don't believe he played Camby one-on-one much, if at all,
in that game.
77.1966UConn's beneficence?MROA::RSCHOTTTue Jan 30 1996 16:5315
         On another subject, a recent New York Times article had a
    wonderful quote by UConn AD Lew Perkins on whether a UMass-UConn game
    could be scheduled as part of the Jimmy V Classic.  Perkins said, 
    "Sounds like a wonderful idea.  What are they going to pay (for an
    appearance fee)?
    
         C'mon Lew where's your altruism?  Where's your interest in putting
    on a game that every Hoop fan in America wants to see?
    
         Gee, first it was not wanting to play in Curry Hicks Cage.  Then
    it was "the snowstorm".  Then it was concern about losing in-state kids
    to another program.  Now its wanting to skim a large sum of money from
    the coffers of a Cancer Fundraiser.  What will they think of next?
    
    Russ
77.1967COPS01::MARTINTue Jan 30 1996 19:393
    UCONN has feasted on cupcakes all year long.....Ummm  Ummm Good!!!
    
    Thomas
77.1968HOW DID THEY DO AGAINST TEMPLE????FABSIX::E_MAXWELLThe Land Of The Stainless MaidenFri Feb 02 1996 09:161
    
77.1970WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Feb 02 1996 10:179
    
    
    U Mass 59
    Temple 35  (only 12 pts 1st half)
    
       Camby was AWESOME BABY!!!! (in my best Dick Vitale voice)
    
    
    Chap
77.1971Yeah Right!FABSIX::E_MAXWELLThe Land Of The Stainless MaidenFri Feb 02 1996 10:297
     >   U Mass 59
     >   Temple 35  (only 12 pts 1st half)
    
     C'mon, just because I work D-shift doesn't mean I'm that gullible.
    This is a high school score. What's the real score!
    
              					Lil Ed
77.1972CAM::WAYWhen can their glory fade?Fri Feb 02 1996 11:179
Ed, that WAS the real score.

I did an aural double-take when I heard it on the radio this morning.

Camby's fainting spell is looking more and more like a publicity stunt.
Is he taking a drama course this semester?


'Saw
77.1973As Sherlock said: eliminate all else and what you have is truthAKOCOA::BREENYou could see that he truly did love the MademoiselleFri Feb 02 1996 15:0211
    because they've eliminated the rest I'm more and more inclined to
    believe that Camby had a full scale hypoglycemic attack.  If he loaded
    up on coke and cupkakes and then had the big adrenal rush, 15 minutes
    of warmups he could simply have insulin'd out all his blood sugar.
    
    Virtually the same as a diabetic coma only for the opposite reason (too
    much insulin).  Calipari is quite sophisticated to be nagging him about
    his diet, but I'll bet Marcus is listening.
    
    And a simple blood test without simulating the circumstances would
    should nothing.
77.1974where's the bench?SALEM::BALL_KFri Feb 02 1996 15:0610
    Interesting (and somewhat disappointing) to see Calipari's lack of use of
    the bench. They were up 10-20 points most of the night and the only
    player off the bench was Weeks until the last minute and a half.  Quite
    a contrast from last year, when he literally went 9 or 10 deep.  I
    suppose there is a bit more of a drop off, but Norville, and Nunez are
    capable and Clarke needs more minutes if he's going to be effective.  I
    think this last of bench time/experience is going to hurt them somtime
    in the tournament
    
    						KB
77.1975SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Fri Feb 02 1996 15:508
    
    	Since it was Temple @Temple, I think coach Cal rubbed it in a
    little. Since UMASS was something like 1-14 the last 15 times @Temple.
    I think Cal and team wanted to hold them under 30 pts for the game.
    Temple did cut the lead down to 7 in the 2nd half. Once it got back
    up to 20, he should have sub a little earlier.
    
    Ron
77.1976Guard TandemLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Feb 02 1996 16:4016
      I am hearing others suggest this...
    
      Are Padilla/Travieso the best guard tandem in the country???
    
      CAN YOU IMAGINE IF THEY ARE???!
    
      Arguably the best player and center.  One of the best small
      forwards.  And the best guard tandem!!
                                                    
      It doesn't insure a championship, but there is NO DOUBT.  This
      is the best team in the country!
    
      One other by the way.  Is this the weakest the ACC has been in
      awhile or what?
    
    						Tony
77.1977ACC is weak thised yearHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedFri Feb 02 1996 16:4616
>      It doesn't insure a championship, but there is NO DOUBT.  This
>      is the best team in the country!

I thought you were gonnna get all worked up with one of those "if they
don't win it they choked" things.

>      One other by the way.  Is this the weakest the ACC has been in
>      awhile or what?

That's the way I see it. No Carolina seems the best and they had to pull
one outta their deep dark place to beat a below average Duke. In the Dean
Dome, to boot!~

However, don't talk to Jeff Sagarin who still thinks they're tops.

TTom
77.1978Bucky............................WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Feb 02 1996 17:155
    
    
    1978 Snarf!!
    
    It twas a very good Year
77.1979What makes the Calipari reign all the more amazingTNPUBS::NAZZAROMarcus is back!Fri Feb 02 1996 17:5319
    For UMass, 1978 was the beginning of the decade-long decline that only 
    halted with the hiring of Coach Cal in 1988.  Jack Leaman's last team
    in 1978-79, with CLaiborne, Pyatt, and Eldridge all graduated, went
    5-22.  Here's their records in each of those ten years:
    
    	1978-79	  5-22
    	1979-80	  2-24 (Start of the Ray Wilson era)
    	1980-81   3-24 (End of the Ray Wilson era)
    	1981-82   7-20 (Tom McLaughlin's first year)
    	1982-83   9-20 (McLaughlin stabbed in back by asst.; fired)
    	1983-84  12-17 (Asst. ron Gerlufsen becomes head coach)
    	1984-85	 13-15 (best season in 5 under Gerlufsen)
    	1985-86   9-19 
    	1986-87	 11-16
    	1987-88  10-17 (last season before Calipari era)
    
    TEN YR TOTAL 81-194
    
    NAZZ
77.1980WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Feb 02 1996 18:1811
    
    
         Ahhh before 1988.
    
        When U Mass only had 10 fans. Before the Bandwagon loaded up.
    
       And No I'm not talking about you Nazz.
    
    
    
    Chap
77.1981Very impressed with the guard play!MROA::RSCHOTTFri Feb 02 1996 18:3815
    RE:  1976
    
         I have a tough time putting numerical rankings on guard tandems,
    but I will say that the play of Padilla and Travieso has been the key
    to UMass' season so far.  Last night is a good example.  Padilla has
    9 assists and only 1 turnover against a quality defensive team.  
    Travieso scores 16 points and absolutely shuts down Johnny Miller.
    
         Like most folks, I viewed the backcourt as UMass' weak link going
    into the season, and never in my wildest dreams thought that Padilla
    and Travieso would be so solid, against the likes of Kentucky, Maryland
    Memphis, Syracuse and Temple.
    
    Russ
        
77.1982What a scare!MROA::HEIER_LMon Feb 05 1996 10:1417
    UMASS 78 XAVIER 74 OT
    
    Another scare...Closest game of the year with Camby playing.
    I really thought they were going to lose with 5 minutes to go but
    this team REFUSES to LOSE.
    
    Camby played decently as well as Weeks and Bright.   The guards will
    effectively shut down by Xavier save the two key plays by
    Padilla (3 pointer and steal).
    
    I really believe this team is going to head into the NCAA tournament
    at 32-0.  Only VA. Tech, Louisville (without many players), GW and
    Temple remain as tough games.
    
    Xavier will be a team to watch out for in the next couple years.
    
    Larry
77.1983USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 05 1996 12:518
>    this team REFUSES to LOSE.
>    I really believe this team is going to head into the NCAA tournament
>    at 32-0.

It's a gimme.

Has any Div 1 team ever run the table completely (ie: reg season and
tournament) ?  One of the UCLA teams ?
77.1984IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Feb 05 1996 13:033
The last one to do it was the 1976 Indiana team.  It's been done multiple
times, though - I know UCLA won 88 straight, which *has* to cover at least
one full year and probably two.
77.1985SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Mon Feb 05 1996 13:098
    
    	Are you sure it was the '76 Indiana team? I thought is was '80 or
    '81. When was Isiah Thomas of the Pistons drafted? before or after
    Bird/Magic. Isiah Thomas was on the Indiana team that ran the table.
    It could be '76, I don't remember Thomas being in the league that
    many years.
    
    Ron
77.1986XTATIC::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Mon Feb 05 1996 13:405
It was definately the 76 team of Indiana. Thomas came after Bird and Magic and 
his team did loose. I believe they lost twice that year. Bestest part of Isiah's
run was they defeated the tarheels for the championship.........

mike 
77.1987gloriousHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedMon Feb 05 1996 13:5919
>It was definately the 76 team of Indiana. Thomas came after Bird and Magic and 
>his team did loose. I believe they lost twice that year. Bestest part of Isiah's
>run was they defeated the tarheels for the championship.........

Quinn Buckner, Ewe Blab and a bunch of others who played the NBA ran the
rack for Bobby Knight. One of the guys, I think his name is Mike Glenn,
does a studio show for TNT.

UCLA fisished undefeated, also.

In a minor bit of trivia, NC State finished the season in 73 undefeated.
They were ineligible because of a violation recruiting David Thompson. At
least they beat the Heels twice. And, oh yeah, won it all the nexted
year.

Thomas won in 81 and it was truly a thrill to see 'im beat Al Wood and
the rest o' the Heels.

TTom
77.1988Can't remember that 5th starterTNPUBS::NAZZAROMarcus is back!Mon Feb 05 1996 14:409
    Mike Glenn went to Southern Illinois, was a second round pick of
    Chicago in 1977, had a nice 10 year NBA career, mostly with Atlanta and
    New York.
    
    The starting five (as I remember it) for that Indiana team in 1976 was
    Benson at center, Bobby Wilkerson and Quinn Buckner at the guards, and
    Scott May and somebody else at forward.
    
    NAZZ
77.1989scrambled brain cellsHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedMon Feb 05 1996 14:420
77.19908^)CAM::WAYWhen can their glory fade?Mon Feb 05 1996 14:474
>    Benson at center, Bobby Wilkerson and Quinn Buckner at the guards, and


Lloyd Benson was playing center in 1976?  At his age?? Wow.
77.1991XTATIC::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Tue Feb 06 1996 12:586
I agree with Nazz but for the life of me can't remember the 5 th player either.
Perhaps Tom Simpson will check in with the answer. In the scrambled brain cells
department I believe Evwe Blab came later than the 76 team........

 mike
77.1992Abernathy?AKOCOA::BREENYou just can't tellTue Feb 06 1996 13:135
    Wasn't there an Abernathy?  I have a call in to the Necromancer of
    Norwood.  I also seem to recall Wilkerson as more of a sixth man.
    
    Talk about an almost hof college player in Scott May who never made it
    in the pros.  I see his peer from NC state made the HoF.
77.1993Kent, and not Clark Kent either.IAMOK::BARRYTue Feb 06 1996 14:464
    Wasn't it Kent Benson ? The guy who played for the Pistons and against
    whom McHale scored 56 points ?
    
    
77.1994IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Feb 06 1996 15:001
He's one of the four already mentioned...
77.1995Checking in...ACISS2::SIMPSON_Tblack rosesTue Feb 06 1996 16:0113
	The Indiana '76 team WAS the last team to run the table.  The starting
five was Kent Benson, Scott May, Tom Abernethy, Quinn Buckner, and Bobby
Wilkerson.  All played for some amount of time in the NBA, with only Buckner 
and Benson lasting for any length of time.  May, the best player on that team,
damaged a knee early in his first year, maybe even in pre-season, and was 
never the player people thought he'd be.

	The '81 team with Thomas actually lost 9 times, if I remember correctly.
They were mediocre at best pre-conference, but by the end of the year were
EASILY the best team in the country.

tom  
77.1996GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Tue Feb 06 1996 18:017
    
    hey tom,
    
    	Who was the guy who hit the shot from the corner to beat Seikaly
    	and the Orange?  It wasn't Thomas was it?
    
    Claybone
77.1997keith Smart if you're talking about IndianaXTATIC::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Tue Feb 06 1996 18:080
77.1998GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Tue Feb 06 1996 18:112
    
    	Yup, thanks MikeyC.
77.1999Yup: Keith SmartLUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Feb 07 1996 11:248
      Yeah, it was Keith Smart and Bobby Knight, imo, almost single-
      handedly lost that game.  He pulled Smart cause he was mad at
      him about something and he barely put him back in that game
      in time.
    
      As I recall, Smart was unconscious in that game.
    
    							Tony
77.2000XTATIC::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 11:397
 Don't recall Smart being unconcious, I thought that Steve Alford had the big 
 game. MVP of the game should been Monroe of SU who took an ill-advised 3       
 pointer when SU was holding an 11 point lead that clanged and then let IU
 back into the game. Should have been burning the clock....

 mike
77.2001XTATIC::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 11:405
Oh yeah and UMass wins agains last night. They won by 20 or so. Camby was as
always the MAN!!!!

mike
77.2002CAM::WAYWhen can their glory fade?Wed Feb 07 1996 12:068
Yep.  That Fordham team is tough.....


Alford did have a big game that evening.  I remember watching that game and it
was one of the most exciting games I'd ever seen.  I can still see Smart going
up to lauch that shot....


77.2003WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 12:2111
    
    
        Fordham ranked 265 out of 305 Div 1 schools.
    
       If UMASS was in the BE they would have 3 losses already.
    
    
    Bank on it!
    
    
    Chap
77.2004SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Wed Feb 07 1996 12:289
    re -1,
    
    	At least SorryExcuse and BC were man enough to play Umass
     this year.
    	Yes, Umass plays Fordham, where does Miami rank? Is Miami
    still the doormat of the BE in BB? What did it take them 3 years
    to get there 1st BE win? Don't they average 2 BE wins a season?
    
    Ron
77.2005IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Feb 07 1996 12:3521
>    	Yes, Umass plays Fordham, where does Miami rank? 

Not that low.  I'll try to check using what Rich Rollins posted.  Come to 
think of it, so could you.

>    Is Miami
>    still the doormat of the BE in BB? 

No.

>    What did it take them 3 years
>    to get there 1st BE win? 

No idea.

>    Don't they average 2 BE wins a season?

Probably, if it took them 3 years to get their first win, and since they
haven't been in the conference that long.

I don't know who the doormats are now - I think Notre Dame is one.
77.2006fyiIMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Feb 07 1996 12:416
Miami (Florida)		10-8 overall, 4-6 conference, RPI of 72 (out of 305)

Big East doormats are:
	Rutgers		RPI 154
	Notre Dame	RPI 139
77.2007BE is surely one very tough conferenceAKOCOA::BREENYou just can't tellWed Feb 07 1996 13:1813
    The comment from Notre Dame about the league is the consistent speed
    across the conference.  Personally the league plays so aggressive and
    the D is so intensive that a viewer doesn't get the aesthetic pleasure
    of watching, say, a big 8 game.  But that's not the BE's problem or
    mission.
    
    One thing that helped and will really help is the BE commissioners
    moves to make referring in BE consistent with what they'll likely find
    in the NCAA, principally the handchecking (can't play all year using
    the hands and find it called suddenly in post season).
    
    Although Stanford's shellacking of Seton Hall at Palo Alto hurt a
    little.  PAC 10, IMO is a much better conference than given credit for.
77.2008USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 07 1996 13:285
This is NOT a knock on UMass, 'cause I think they're a solid TOP-5 team
under any ranking formula, but I saw recently (ESPNET?) that their
*non-conference schedule* has a power index that's LESS THAN the same
index for UConn, G'town, Vill and Syracuse.  I was shocked, especially
given the "play anyone, anywhere" hype we've been hearing for years.
77.2009Ha!MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Feb 07 1996 13:568
    
  >> the "play anyone, anywhere" hype we've been hearing for years.
    
     It ain't "hype". Hype would be trying to tout anyone from the 
     Big East as a legit POY candidate. Umass' schedules bear out 
     the 'play anyone anywhere' as fact. Or do you have evidence that 
     they've refused to play someone? Connecticut perhaps?
    
77.2010WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 14:1215
    
    
        I'm just sick of hearing about there schedule!!
    
        They did play KY in the first game of the season. (I think they
    would lose now) WAke Forest was a challenge. But I just think its gonna
    hurt them come time for the big dance with Xavier,Fordham,Duquesne,and
    St Bonny prepping them in the last month.
    
         Meanwhile G'town,Syracuse an 'Nova take a beating in the polls
    because they are losing to quality opponents. (pittsburgh withstanding
    :-) )
    
    
    Chap
77.2011just an observationUSCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 07 1996 14:349
>     Umass' schedules bear out 
>     the 'play anyone anywhere' as fact. Or do you have evidence that 
>     they've refused to play someone? Connecticut perhaps?

OK.  My mistake.  The "hype" appears to be about their non-conference
schedule being the toughest in the land.  According to this power
ranking I saw, that isn't the case, and the top-4 BE schools (who
*supposedly* play cupcakes all the time) have tougher non-conference
schedules.
77.2012just the facts, m'amMROA::RSCHOTTWed Feb 07 1996 14:3539
    RE:  Non-conference schedules
    
    UCONN:  TCU, Iowa(19), Indiana(*), Northeastern, Yale, Fla.St.,
            Fairfield, College of Charleston, Hartford, Central Ct.
    
    Syracuse:  Lafayette, Colgate, Columbia, Wash.St., Bowling Green,
               College of Charleston, Arizona(16), Illinois(*), URI,
               UMass(1)
    
    BC:   Buffalo, Holy Cross, Louisville(*), UMass (1), Md.-Balt.County,
          Hartford, Brooklyn, Vanderbilt(*?)
    
    Georgetown:   Colgate, Geo.Tech(*), Arizona(16), So.New Orleans,
                  Cal.St. Sacremento, St.Francis, Morgan St., Duquesne,
                  St.Leo, Depaul
    
    Villanova:  Wisconsin, Santa Clara, North Carolina(12), Bradley,
                Purdue(14), Temple, New Orleans, Hofstra, Delaware
    
    UMASS:   Kentucky(2), Maryland(*), Florida, Wake Forest(9), BC(*),
             UNC-Wilmington, Geo.Tech(*), NC State, USC, Syracuse(18),
             Memphis(15), Louisville(*)
    
    Notes - current AP ranking in parenthesis, (*) indicates a previous
            Top 25 ranking from memory.
    
    Joe, and others:  Surely you can't suggest that any of the Big East
                      non conference schedules listed above measures up
                      to the UMass Schedule?
    
    And by the way, do I think that UMass is playing the best basketball in
    the country right now?  No, not by a long shot.  I would give that
    distinction to Kentucky, Cincinnati or UConn.  Do I think UMass would
    have three losses in the Big East?  Nope!  UMass and UConn would be a 
    hell of a game.  Villanova and Georgetown ... I think UMass would find a 
    way to beat them.  And we know what happened to BC, Syracuse and Pitt.
    
    Russ
                    
77.2013WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 14:446
    
    
        Georgetown also plays Memphis. And I think they played Temple?
    
    
    Chap
77.2014USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 07 1996 14:4933
Russ, et al,

I went looking for that non-conference ranking index and can't find
it now.  Here's the RPI stuff off ESPNET, and it has an overall schedule
index (FII), which shows UMass' schedule as tougher than UConn's
and G'town's, but not as tough as SU's or Vill's.

What the attached indicates is that UMass' scheduling tough non-conference
opponents appears to be needed to *try* to offset their weak A-10 opponents...
something we non_A-10 guys have been saying the last 2 years.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESPNET SportsZone | Men's college basketball

Rating Percentage Index

Through Feb. 3, 1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rating Percentage Index (RPI) has been used by the NCAA since 1981 to
supplement the selection of at-large teams and the seeding of all teams for
the NCAA basketball tournament. This list is an independent duplication of
the RPI without input from the NCAA, which does not release the RPI to the
public. It is derived from three component factors: Div. I winning
percentage (FI, 25%), schedule strength (FII, 50%); and opponent's schedule
strength (FIII, 25%). Games against non-Division I opponents are not used
in calculating the RPI.

Rank Team                     W  L      (FII)       RPI
  2. Massachusetts           20  0      .5852      .6880
  3. Villanova               18  3      .6434      .6791
  9. Connecticut             21  1      .5368      .6468
 13. Syracuse                15  6      .6272      .6279
 33. Georgetown              17  3      .4791      .5953
77.2015MROA::RSCHOTTWed Feb 07 1996 14:527
    Chap:
    
         My mistake, Georgetown plays No. 15 Memphis on February 17th.
    
         Doesn't change my conclusion, though ;^)!
    
    Russ
77.2016WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 14:556
    
    
      And 'Nova played NC twice.
    
    
    Chap
77.2017UNotYHBAHBA::HAASslightly relatedWed Feb 07 1996 14:567
>      And 'Nova played NC twice.

Understatement Note o' the Year!~

You coulda at least told us who won, like we din't know ...

TTom
77.2018CNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 15:037
 Don't know if you were refering to me Tommy about the POY comment because
 I have been discussing it alot but I'm refering to POY of the Big East         
 conference not the country.  Everybody knows it's Camby unless there's
 some horrible miscarriage of justice or the voters just look at the stats.

 mike 
77.2019WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 15:097
    
    
       I too was talking about POY of the BE. Camby deserves the POY for
    the whole country. 
    
    
    Chap
77.2020MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Feb 07 1996 15:127
  >> Don't know if you were refering to me Tommy about the POY comment 
    
     Nope, I was referring to anyone who thinks that Wallace, Allen or
     Kittles should even be close to Camby for POY consideration. None
     of those three and probably no one in the country can dominate a
     game at both ends of the floor like Camby can. 
77.2021IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Feb 07 1996 15:1611
>     Nope, I was referring to anyone who thinks that Wallace, Allen or
>     Kittles should even be close to Camby for POY consideration. None
>     of those three and probably no one in the country can dominate a
>     game at both ends of the floor like Camby can. 

Well, Tommy, you might want to examine context.  The discussion was about
Big East Player of the Year.  Last I heard, Camby didn't play in the Big East.
Of course, this also makes you wonder why a Big East discussion is happening
in the UMass note anyway... :-)

Oh yes, this is ::SPROTS!!!
77.2022MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Feb 07 1996 15:229
    
      I don't have to "examine context". I brought the whole thing up
     when I said in refernce to Joe calling the "play anyone, anywhere"
     attitude hype:
    
    " It ain't "hype". Hype would be trying to tout anyone from the 
      Big East as a legit POY candidate."
    
      But thanks for trying.
77.2023IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Feb 07 1996 15:4318
>      I don't have to "examine context". I brought the whole thing up
>     when I said in refernce to Joe calling the "play anyone, anywhere"
>     attitude hype:
>    
>    " It ain't "hype". Hype would be trying to tout anyone from the 
>      Big East as a legit POY candidate."
    

Well, I must have gotten the discussion in the Big East note confused
with this one, then.  That's where most of the Kittles, Allen, Wallace
discussion has been.

>      But thanks for trying.

Thank you for your beneficence, and for providing myself and everyone else
here the opportunity to bask in the glow of your obviously overpowering
intelligence.  The fact that you deign to communicate on occasion with mere
mortals such as myself only confers greater glory on you.
77.2024CAM::WAYWhen can their glory fade?Wed Feb 07 1996 15:4522
>     when I said in refernce to Joe calling the "play anyone, anywhere"
>     attitude hype:
>    
>    " It ain't "hype". Hype would be trying to tout anyone from the 
>      Big East as a legit POY candidate."
>    
>      But thanks for trying.

Depends on whether you're pulling a George or looking at context.

If you look at what Joe LITERALLY wrote, it's easy to infer, rightly or
wrongly, that he might have been referring to an overall NCAA PoY.  (Is there
such a thing?)

But, if you look at context, then it's easy to see that while he wasn't
EXPLICIT in his statement, Joe was thinking of the BE PoY.


Leastways that's the way I see it, 
'Saw


77.2025MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Feb 07 1996 15:572
    
      What the hell are you talking about, ' Saw?
77.2026MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Feb 07 1996 15:597
    >> Thank you for your beneficence, and for providing myself and 
    >> everyone else blah blah blah
    
       Let's not get carried away. All I did was point out that you 
       didn't know what you were talking about. That doesn't exactly
       qualify me for Nobel Prize consideration.
77.2027WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 16:006
    
    
        Apology accepted Roland.
    
    
    chap
77.2028CAM::WAYWhen can their glory fade?Wed Feb 07 1996 16:0016
>    
>      What the hell are you talking about, ' Saw?
>

Actually, re-reading it, I have no earthly idea what I'm talking about.

I'm still not feeling very well today, and I think that, today, unless there's
little names beside the dialog, like in a script, I'm going to keep on being
horribly messed up.

Forget I said anything.  I think I'll just go home and have some tea, liberally
laced with some kind of whiskey....


'Saw

77.2029this from a guy who likes Cricket ;=)HBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Wed Feb 07 1996 16:000
77.2030IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Feb 07 1996 16:1329
>       Let's not get carried away. All I did was point out that you 
>       didn't know what you were talking about. That doesn't exactly
>       qualify me for Nobel Prize consideration.

Nor does your attitude.

I made what is called a "mistake".  I own up to my mistakes - I know that in
this conference that's akin to a crime, but it's a bad habit I've developed
over the years.

I didn't prattle on for years and years.  I didn't let myself continually get
baited into "is ???? a sport" debates, wasting kilobytes of disk space.  I
simply confused the content of one string of notes with another, and I was not
alone in doing so.  Unfortunately, this seems to put me in the category of
"don't know what I'm talking about".

---------

Now back to our regularly scheduled programming:

No one in their right mind is debating Camby for *National* Player of the Year
right now.  And I also can't see arguing against UMass as #1 - they're the only
undefeated team, and they've beaten top competition.  But I think folks are
having too much of a knee jerk reaction to what Joe G. has brought up (even
though it did appear he was trying to stir up trouble).  It's valid to wonder
if UMass doesn't schedule top notch teams because they *have* to.

I've seen quite a few staunch defenders of the A-10 in here, but the truth is,
it's not that deep of a conference.
77.2031IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Feb 07 1996 16:158
>        Apology accepted Roland.    
>    
>    chap

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I've still got the "Lets Go Hoyas" sign.  I'm saving it for the
next game.
77.2032cut that out or you'll really be sorryHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Wed Feb 07 1996 16:1810
Faux moderator stepping in.

There'll be no more apologizing in SPROTS.

It's completely against the spirit of the conference. And besides, it
only confuses us.

So screw you, screw you, screw you. Who next?

TTom
77.2033IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Feb 07 1996 16:204
>So screw you, screw you, screw you. Who next?

In West By Gawd Virginee (A-10 conference member for that UMass tie-in),
anyone is eligible...
77.2034right state, wrong conferenceHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Wed Feb 07 1996 16:237
Ooops!~

You had us goin fer awhile but thised year them 'Eers is in the Big East.

They don't have anyone to challenge Camby for POY, though...

TTom
77.2035It's bus #7, Rain Man...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelWed Feb 07 1996 16:239
> Forget I said anything.  I think I'll just go home and have some tea, liberally
> laced with some kind of whiskey....
    
    No.  You will head directly to the dog track, do not pass go, do not 
    collect $200...
    
    glenn
    
77.2036.USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 07 1996 16:275
>But I think folks are
>having too much of a knee jerk reaction to what Joe G. has brought up (even
>though it did appear he was trying to stir up trouble).

But I did it in such a nice way (read disclaimer just prior to bait).
77.2037MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Feb 07 1996 16:3717
    
      Roland ,your signal to noise ratio is as good as anybody's
     but I couldn't`let your little slip pass. Of course, if this 
     weren't the kinder, gentler version of ::SPORTS I'd not tell 
     you that but instead continue to harass you until you felt 
     like taking a swing at me then post a note berating you for 
     having no sense of humor.
    
      And yes, of course UMASS schedules tough out of conference
     comp because their in conference comp is shall we say lacking.
     It's the old domino effect. They'd never be ranked as high,
     they'd not be on national tv as much, they'd not recruit 
     as much if they didn't play the tough schedule. The Colgate 
     coach said pretty much the same thing about his school 
     when they landed Adonal Foyle. He had to schedule tough
     out of conference comp if he ever hoped to get as much as
     an NCAA bid because his conference is not very strong. 
77.2038he be OK?HBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Wed Feb 07 1996 16:408
re: Adonal Foyle

How's he doing? I saw a clip over the weekend where he did a_endo on a
breakaway. I couldn't tell if'n he got undercut or just dumb luck. In any
case, he was high flying, with heels over haid and hit the court real
hard.

TTom
77.2039Decent-looking teamTNPUBS::NAZZAROMarcus is back!Wed Feb 07 1996 16:4623
    Back to the UMass topic ....
    
    Here's my take on the A-10 All-Conference team:
    
    C - Marcus Camby, UMass
    F - Ace Custis, Virginia Tech
    F - Donta Bright, UMass
    G - Kwame Evans, GW
    G - Edgar Padilla, UMass
    
    2nd team
    
    C - Alexander Koul, GW
    F - Marc Jackson, Temple
    F - Sean Smith, Virginia Tech
    G - Tyson Wheeler, URI
    G - Damon Watlington, Virginia Tech
    
    Coach of the Year - John Calipari, UMass
    Player of the Year - Marcus Camby, UMass
    Newcomer of the Year - Marc Jackson, Temple
    
    NAZZ
77.2040CNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 16:474
from the highlight I saw he got pushed from behind TTom. 


77.2041USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 07 1996 16:514
>How's he doing? I saw a clip over the weekend where he did a_endo on a

He's recovering fine.  Hit his head pretty hard and was out cold for 90
seconds.  It's not known if he will play tonight vs. Holy Cross.
77.2042USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Feb 07 1996 16:546
>    Here's my take on the A-10 All-Conference team:
>    G - Edgar Padilla, UMass

Padilla and not Travieso ?  I don't watch a lot of UMass, but the highlights
and boxscores indicate to me that Travieso is more valuable to them than
Padilla.  Padilla isn't as good a shooter, is he ?
77.2043CNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 16:595
Padilla is more valuable because he's the point. Both play excellent defense
with Padilla probably getting more steal. Again stats don't tell the whole
story.......

mike
77.2044Padilla deserves all A-10 berthTNPUBS::NAZZAROMarcus is back!Wed Feb 07 1996 16:598
    Padilla is the PG, the glue that holds the entire team together.  He
    has a 3-1 assist-turnaover ratio, and has huge cahunas.  Travieso is
    the best defensive guard in the country, but Padilla is no slouch in
    that regard (Edgar is in the top five in the nation in steals).  For
    Travieso to get All-Conference, he'd have to get more consistent from
    the outside.
    
    NAZZ
77.2045WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Wed Feb 07 1996 17:0413
    
    
       He was against Xavier.
    
    
    re Roland, Glad you saved the sign so I won't have to make up another
    one for ya Monday.
    
    
    G'town at Sorryexcuse this Saturday.
    
    
    Chap
77.2046Whos' Derek Kellogg?MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Feb 07 1996 17:0913
>    Here's my take on the A-10 All-Conference team:
>    G - Edgar Padilla, UMass

    I'll take full credit for being the first one on the Padilla
    bandwagon way back when he first came aboard. What I liked 
    about him then is what I like about him now. He has great hands,
    he's quick, he likes to play defense and he can score from virt-
    ually anywhere on the floor. Still, I'd put Traveiso on the all-
    con team ahead of him. It's Carmelo who always draws the toughest 
    defensive assignment. And it's Carmelo who stepped up his off-
    ense when Marcus went down. And when Padilla gets in to foul 
    trouble like he tends to, it's Carmelo who does a great job
    of handling the ball.
77.2047IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Feb 07 1996 17:175
>    re Roland, Glad you saved the sign so I won't have to make up another
>    one for ya Monday.
 
The idea was to save you the walk if G'town wins, and to leave it in your
cube as a pleasant reminder to keep your chin up if they lose... :-)
77.2048A-10 WeakLUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Feb 07 1996 19:3317
      I have to admit, the notion of Georgetown having a stronger non-
      Conference schedule than just about anybody (much less UMass) is   
      fascinating!  (I tried to find the nicest word I could.)
    
      I really don't like the A-10.  I really think UMass should have
      bid hard to get into the same Conference that Memphis/Cinci/Marquette
      are in.  Is that the USA???
    
      I think its just a lot of fun to see Brydie have one of his 'rabid'
      spells.  It adds to the dynamics of this Conf.  Its fun seeing some-
      thing like 30+ replies within a single day and to come to realize
      that Tommy once again played the role of catalyst.
    
      What would we do without you???
    
    							Tony
      
77.2049A10 vs Big EastMROA::HEIER_LThu Feb 08 1996 09:585
    What's the A10's record vs. the Big East this year?
    
    I know its at least 4-0 (temple&UMASS).
    
    Larry
77.2050Big East leads the seriesMROA::RSCHOTTThu Feb 08 1996 11:404
         I have it at BE - 9 wins, A-10 - 5 wins, with Villanova vs.
    LaSalle remaining to be played.  
    
    Russ
77.2051Not to put words in Tommy's mouthAKOCOA::BREENYou just can't tellThu Feb 08 1996 14:1419
    I have to acknowledge that Tommy was way out in front on Edgar Padilla
    since I thought I was the first and all I had was a few notes
    suggesting last year that Padilla was becoming a key more than Kellogg
    and much more than Mike Williams.  But Tommy was onto him in 93 along
    with some folks that spotted him in high school.
    
    Padilla btw was injured or sick prior to the OSU final loss last year.
    Also, Edgar played his junior year in Springfield and then his senior
    year in Puerto Rico playing with many PR Olympians; info I garnered
    from this note.
    
    Some of us just like good basketball and have adopted UMass regardless
    of conference affiliation.  In fact all this conference stuff is still
    a bit of a fad for some of us who are still a bit nostalgic about the
    "good ol" ECAC days of about 40 eastern independents and the likes of
    Fairfield fielding the occasional NIT caliber team.
    
    Finally I'll bet playing #1 UMass did wonders for Syracuse's opponent
    index not to speak of BC's.
77.2052Dayton Center Chris Daniels is DeadGLRMAI::WILKESThu Feb 08 1996 14:398
    Since there is no A-10 note I thought I would post this here.
    
    According to ESPN Sports Net Dayton Center Chris Daniels died at
    5:30 AM this morning.
    
    A 6-10 Center, he was second in the country in Field Goal Percentage.
    
    No cause of death was reported.
77.2053CNTROL::CHILDSCheatin' Cowboys suck!!!Thu Feb 08 1996 14:565
You can thank dearly departed ACChris and BigTen Bigot Tom for all this
rah rah conference stuff. They started it!

 ;^)
77.2054Where is that guy now??WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Feb 09 1996 12:173
    
    
       SO MUCH FOR THAT 4-0 COMMENT HUH???
77.2055I can't help it... :-)IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Feb 09 1996 13:226
>       SO MUCH FOR THAT 4-0 COMMENT HUH???

Now, now, Chap - be gracious.  5-9 doesn't preclude them being 4-0 at
one point.

Of course, it would then infer a 1-9 streak...
77.2056Newton > CambyHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Fri Feb 09 1996 16:2715
one fer the fodder...

A couple of games ago, Wake Forest rallied to beat Duke. After the game,
Duke's center lost it and went on a tirade of how soft Tim Duncan was,
how his game was babyish, and that he couldn't take any kinda physical
game.

Without a_assist from a smiley, Tim Duncan's apparent  reply was that
Newton was the best player that he had faced thised season, just a shade
ahead of Marcus Camby.

I wanna see some tape footage of that comment to see how Duncan could
complete the sentence much less say it with a straight face.

TTom
77.2057Camby and DuncanMROA::RSCHOTTFri Feb 09 1996 16:4518
    Re: .2056
    
         One possible explanation for Duncan's response is that the SI
    article following the UMass-Wake game, had Camby talking some trash
    after the game regarding Duncan.  The statements were supposedly made
    by Camby while talking to friends (not to the press), and were probably
    not meant for public consumption.  Anyway, I could see where Duncan
    would be a bit ticked off about Camby's comments.  The statements were
    to the effect that "Duncan was soft" and that "I (Camby) schooled him",
    .... something like that.
    
         When the subject of the NBA Draft comes up on Boston Talk Radio,
    most commentators (and "experts" from around the league) still have 
    Tim Duncan as the first choice in the draft, provided he and Camby 
    come out this year.
    
    Russ
                             
77.2058MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Feb 09 1996 16:458
 
         Have you seen Newton? He's almost as big a stiff as Travis
     Naught. That would make him an 8 on a scale of 10. Marc Jackson 
     from Temple completely abused Newton. That's the same Mark Jackson 
     who was shutdown by UMass' Tyrone Weeks. Duncan's (Brad Daugherty, Jr.)
     statement is probably completely based on the fact that Newton is
     very physical.
    
77.2059yes, a very big stiffHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Fri Feb 09 1996 16:4612
Yeah, I've caught Newton on several occasions.

Newton was all-ever-thing-in-Canada as a prep and was supposed to be one
of the anchors for the nexted generation of champions at Duke. Wail, that
never happened and Newton should get a lot of credit.

In fack, this is the firsted year that he's actually got any PT.

I gotta believe that Duncan is just setting him up for the game in
Winston-Salem on Sunday.

TTom
77.2060TLE::PHILLIPSFri Feb 09 1996 17:3210
There is no way that playing away games in the A10 is anywhere near as hard
as winning on the road in the Big 10, ACC, Big East,...  Sure there are a
couple that are tough, but these other conferences have more than a couple
tough away games.   That doesn't make Umass any less of a team, they fully
deserve to be #1. But, if Umass had the choice of jumping to the ACC or Big
East, I'd bet they'd jump in a minute.

And ...conference games are always more hard fought than non conference 
games (NCAA tournament games excluded).
77.2061GWU is coming on!MROA::RSCHOTTMon Feb 12 1996 15:2626
         A team that's starting to turn some heads after a slow start is
    George Washington University.  The Colonials stand at 15-5, but are
    11-2 since 5'3" point guard Shawnta Rogers became eligible in January.
    Incredibly, Rogers has led GWU in REBOUNDING in three games, pulling
    down 11 boards in a game against Temple, two weeks ago!  GWU isn't a
    real deep team, but with four year starters Kwame Evans and Vaughn
    Jones, two good Russian front court players, and Rogers at the point, 
    they'll cause some damage as the regular season winds down and in the post
    season.
    
         A team going in the opposite direction is Temple, judging by their
    game with UMass yesterday.  UMass played about their best offensive
    game of the year, but if one thing stands out about this Temple team
    based on the two UMass games, its that they don't have a clue on the 
    offensive end.  Center, Marc Jackson seems to be the only player doing
    anything for Temple.  In fairness, guard Johnny Miller is playing with
    a dislocated shoulder, and has completely lost his outside shot after
    an impressive freshman season, but the rest of the players such as
    Derrick Battie, Lynard Stewart and Levan Alston have been major 
    disappointments.  Temple looks to me to be NIT bound, even with their
    wins over Kansas, Villanova and Duke.
    
         UMass has Lasalle on Thursday, and then a matchup with #10
    Virginia Tech on Saturday, in Blacksburg.
    
    Russ 
77.2062IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Feb 12 1996 15:468
>    Incredibly, Rogers has led GWU in REBOUNDING in three games, pulling
>    down 11 boards in a game against Temple, two weeks ago! 

I would think this would indicate good interior defense on GW's part.
Guards (especially 5'3" ones) don't pull down that many rebounds unless
there's a lot of *long* rebounds - like those off of a missed 3-pointer.

Just my 2 cents...
77.2063USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 12 1996 16:0412
>    Temple looks to me to be NIT bound, even with their
>    wins over Kansas, Villanova and Duke.

Yeah, now's the time the committee will start to look for *reasons*
why Temple beat those schools, such as:  Duke ain't nothin' great;
'Nova is a bitter rivalry thang;  and Kansas musta been a fluke.


>         UMass has Lasalle on Thursday, and then a matchup with #10
>    Virginia Tech on Saturday, in Blacksburg.

VT is the only obstacle to a perfect regular season.
77.2064This would be the one to loseCSLALL::BRULEcountry in need of a leaderMon Feb 12 1996 18:261
    What about Louisville?
77.2065USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 12 1996 19:474
>    What about Louisville?

Well, the game is at Louisville, so you can never rule-out an NCAA dog.
But they have no inside game, and look who's in the middle for UMass.
77.2066Vintage VitaleLUDWIG::BARBIERITue Feb 13 1996 11:3540
      I couldn't help enjoying the commentary during the UMass game.
      Vitale was...well, vintage Vitale.  He was talking about the
      desire for a UMass/UConn game and he all but said that anything
      standing in the way of the game was Jim Calhoun.  He almost seemed
      to go berserk as he begged Calhoun to play the game.  It was
      hilarious!
    
      He also said that he preferred UConn to UMass.  It was kind of 
      funny as he was saying something like, "Can the UMass fans hear
      me?  Are we gonna get out of here alive?  Are you sure they can't
      hear me?  Cause I like UConn!!!"  It was great.  (By the way, he
      said he felt it would be a nailbiter though and he highly lauded
      both programs and teams.)
    
      Keady was asked the same question and he likes UMass over UConn.
      Vitale was asked if he feels those are the best teams.  NO WAY.
      He definitely likes Kentucky all the way.
    
      Keady had a good summary of the game.  Anyone looks pretty when 
      you hit from the outside like that.  Man, I just hope Travieso
      hits like that come tournament time.  In a lot of ways, he is
      the key as I feel the one thing that is not a game to game given
      is outside shooting.
    
      One thing that really impressed me was Camby's passing.  Gosh, it
      was incredible.  The passes were often so immediate after he got
      the ball.  It must be a nightmare trying to defend Camby knowing 
      he has the passing ability he does.  The way to stop him, I think,
      is to make him shoot those outside face ups.
    
      Meanwhile, I saw the 1st half of Arizona/Cinci and then turned it
      on with 1:45 left and decided to watch the whole game as it was
      tied.  Seeing a finish like that is what its all about.  Unreal!!!
    
      I'm curious about one thing.  How would Padilla/Travieso do against
      the UConn guards?
    
      Well, hats off to a very entertaining Sunday college basketball-wise.
      
    							Tony
77.2067watch outHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Tue Feb 13 1996 12:525
I'm sure UMass won't take the game at Louisville lightly. I've seen the
Cardinals play several times. Sometimes they look like they can compete
with anybody and sometimes it looks like they caint.

TTom
77.2068AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellTue Feb 13 1996 14:176
    I'm with Russ.  The game to watch out for is GW.  But where is it
    played?  At Mullins I don't see any chance for anyone.
    
    Kansas is the one team I'd worry about in the ncaas; they also appear
    to have a good backcourt.  They also beat UM fair and square, although
    at home and last year.
77.2069TLE::PHILLIPSTue Feb 13 1996 16:578
The sad thing is that people want to see the game with the current teams
(Umass/Uconn). What good is it when one or both is in a rebuilding year?
Uconn will be next year - I don't know about Umass. According to the Globe
yesterday it is not Calloun - its a $ issue. Sadly, the claim is Uconn can
get as much $ playing another team home than splitting with Umass.

I hope they meet in the NCAA's.
77.2070CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Tue Feb 13 1996 17:1029
A lot of it IS money.

There is tremendous pressure to spread the wealth of UConn's stature around the
state.  

Why does UCONN play Central?  Simple reason.  The powers-that-be want some of
UCONN's earning power to help the coffers of another team in the state school
system.  

I went to Central.  Decent school.  Lousy basketball and football team.  Has
been for centuries. 8^)  

But seriously, those funds come back into the state school system and are used
for many things.  Calhoun is pressured to play Central.  Believe me, if Western
or Eastern had hoops teams that were close to Central, they'd be pressuring
Calhoun to have them on the schedule too.

University of Hartford might have been a good game (better than Central at any
rate) at one point, but not today.  Again, it's a case of keeping the money in
the state.

I'd love to see UCONN play UMASS.  Won't see it though, because like someone
said, the $$$ would have to be split.


Oh well....


'Saw
77.2071UMass could travel because they are so highly ratedILBBAK::SILVESTRISoar with the Eagles!Tue Feb 13 1996 17:2116
	There is a hypothetical NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament
	64 team pairing on ESPNet ... and they put UMass as the
	Number 1 seed in the SouthEast ...

	Good logic for it too, they figured the NCAA would want to 
	set up a UMass / Kentucky final ... because of reasons already
	explained ( a regional being played in Lexington) Kentucky 
	will probably get the Number 1 seed in the MidWest, the MidWest
	champion plays the East champion in the semifinals, if the
	NCAA wants to set up a #1 vs #2 for the finals, UMass would
	have to go to the SouthEast ...

	UConn would then get the Number 1 seed in the East (unless they
	falter in the Big East tourney) ...

	Vinny
77.2072Lousy Pairings!MROA::RSCHOTTTue Feb 13 1996 18:2012
         I checked out the ESPNet pairings that Vinnie referred to.  If
    I'm UMass, there's no way I want to be put in the Southeast, if Kansas
    and Cincinnati (final four quality teams in my opinion) are the no.2
    and no.3 seedings respectively.  And a potential rematch with BC as
    the no. 8 seed would be no fun either!
    
         Given ESPN's hypothetical pairings, send me west in place of
    Villanova, where the 2,3 and 4 seeds are Arizona, Utah and UCLA.
    Or keep me east where I belong!
    
    Russ
                                       
77.2073MROA::RSCHOTTTue Feb 13 1996 18:359
         To make this discussion a bit easier to follow, ESPNet had the
    following "top" seedings:
    
    Southeast:  UMass, Kansas, Cincinnati and Mississippi St.
    West:  Villanova, Arizona, Utah, UCLA
    East:  UConn, Penn State, North Carolina, Ga.Tech
    Midwest:  Kentucky, Purdue, Wake Forest, Syracuse
    
    Russ
77.2074IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Feb 13 1996 19:142
Southeast and Midwest look tougher than the West and East.
77.2075AbsurdLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Feb 13 1997 11:408
      That seeding is utterly absurd!  Having UMass have to be with
      Kansas and Cincinatti.  They're still in the top 4, right?
    
      Unreal.  UMass, at worst, should have to play the #8 team
      in the country in their regional final (should they finish as
      consensus #1).  #8 would be the lowest 2 seed.
    
    						Tony
77.2076MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Feb 13 1997 11:487
    
      Those seedings will change in the next couple of weeks. Utah
     has shown that it doesn't deserve a three seed by losing to
     12-11 Wyoming. PSU isn't a two seed either and they won't get
     one come tourney time.Z
    
    
77.2077Love to see UMass play Villanova, but Nova won't get that farTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass will run the table - 38-0!Thu Feb 13 1997 13:097
    Villanova a #1 seed?!?!?!?  HAW! HAW! HAW!
    
    They'll be lucky to be a #2 seed, and they will have trouble making the
    sweet 16.  Nova is as big a fraud team as there is out there.
    
    NAZZ
    
77.2078MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Feb 15 1996 14:5112
    
      Dan Shaugnessy continuing his mutual love affair with 
      UMass fans:
    
      "John Calipari had better watch it when he gets to the NCAA
       tournament. In his own soft conference, officials let him
       get away with murder (just think of what the University of
       Massachusetts' record might be if the Globe and the refs
       didn't have it in for the Minutemen). Coach Cal gets more
       rope than just about anybody, but no self-respecting tourn-
       ament official will put up with the nonstop complaining from
       the UMass bench."
77.2079To T or not to T, that is the questionAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Feb 15 1996 18:1115
    Well I wouldn't put any weight on what Shaughnessy says.  I do hope Cal
    isn't doing a lot of small bickering since he's got to save his T's for
    the big moment.  Last year as you all know by now he got a big time
    screwing and it all happened so fast (fouls 2,3 on Camby vs OSU) that
    Cal never reacted.
    
    	Even foul number four didn't result in a technical in that game but
    the one game (maybe all the way back to Maryland) that the refs seemed
    to be picking on Camby he went out of his way to get a technical.  A
    college coach should never get a technical that he doesn't plan since
    it is his major trump card.  Two results in ejection but referees don't
    usually want that to happen.  Great acting (they're all great actors
    and so are most of the officials - I wish you all had seen the infamous
    Charley Deal who dominated eastern officialdom in the '70s) is
    critical.
77.2080USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 15 1996 18:302
USA Today says UMass made the Final Four in '90-91.  I don't ever remember
UMass in the Final Four.
77.2081Re: .2080MROA::RSCHOTTThu Feb 15 1996 18:475
         UMass made the NIT Final Four in the year mentioned in the USA
    Today Article.  I expect to see a correction in tomorrow's edition.
    
    Russ
                                                    
77.2082I agree Coach doth protest too muchGLRMAI::WILKESFri Feb 16 1996 12:2610
    re 2078, 2079
    
    I agree with Shaugnessy, Calipari does rag the Refs too much even when
    the momentum of the game is clearly in the favor of UMass. Witness the
    technical he got in the second half last last night when UMass had gone
    up by 11.
    
    Getting foolish technicals against good teams when you are up 8-10
    points is one of the best ways to swing the momentum back to your
    opponent.
77.2083Meanwhile...LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Feb 19 1996 18:1610
      Meanwhile, some of the other top teams are looking mighty 
      strong.  A workmate saw UConn and said they looked solid.
      Kentucky demolished Tennessee by 40 (90-50).  Top scorer
      had something like 16 points.  Talk about unselfish play 
      with everyone chipping in close to double figures.
    
      I hope Kentucky can't be met until the championship (should
      they get that far!).
    
    						Tony
77.2084undefeated going into the NCAA tourney !USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 19 1996 18:310
77.2085Vote here for Camby on Olympic teamAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellMon Feb 19 1996 18:4018
    Anyone think Camby should get serious consideration for the two open
    spots on the Olympic team besides me?  My think is less in terms of
    giving Camby recognition than as an insurance policy, especially on
    defense, especially coming of the bench.
    
    I could see him coming in and igniting 5 minutes of pressure, fastbreak
    basketball to break a game open, especially against slow European
    teams.  Also, to disprupt some of the extremely, accurate outside
    shooters.
    
    I doubt they'll add him since if he was as successful as I'd guess, it
    would translate to an embarrassment for the nba stars.  I do concede
    that the experience would greatly benefit Camby - he's got some habits
    that won't work against the height and savvy of the nba.
    
    Ryan was saying that Camby told him Va Tech was only an average game
    and he can play much better - I agree and that level will be truly
    awesome to behold.
77.2086Camby had just an "average" game vs. Virginia TechTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass will run the table - 38-0!Mon Feb 19 1996 18:4012
    I must admit I am more worried about URI tomorrow night in Providence
    than I was over the weekend against Virginia Tech.  Rhody only lost by
    six at UMass earlier this year, and Tyson Wheeler was almost completely
    shut down by Carmelo Travieso (Wheeler only 2nd half FG came with six
    seconds left in the game).  If URI beats the Minutemen, they will have
    a legitimate shot at an NCAA bid.  I look for another UMass victory,
    but it will be very close.
    
    NAZZ
    
    PS - How 'bout the deffensive job Dana Dingle did on Ace Custis?!?!?
    
77.2087USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 19 1996 19:145
>    Anyone think Camby should get serious consideration for the two open
>    spots on the Olympic team besides me?

I don't a reason for it.  Besides, what one-on-one defensive ability
has he displayed that the current crop of NBA-ers can't do ?
77.2088AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellMon Feb 19 1996 19:346
    One on one defense would be waste of Camby, I'd use him the way Calipari
    uses him as a roamabout shot intimidator and by my observation he's the best
    at this pro or college in some time.  I have a suspicion that ML Carr
    and perhaps other feel that he is the draft coup of the decade. 
    Unfortunately, I fear that others have the same thought and we won't
    pull it off.
77.2089USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 19 1996 19:556
>   One on one defense would be waste of Camby, I'd use him the way Calipari
>   uses him as a roamabout shot intimidator and by my observation he's the best
>   at this pro or college in some time.

But Bill, we know there are no zone defenses in the NBA...are they allowed
in the Olympics ?
77.2090AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellMon Feb 19 1996 19:594
    I'm pretty sure there's no restriction, perse.  I'm not entirely sure
    though , just observation.  Even in the nba a player driving to the
    basket is fair game for any defender.  The key is for the player Camby
    is defending to stand on the perimeter.
77.2091Olympics definately allow Zone defenseXTATIC::CHILDSHarry Browne for President!Tue Feb 20 1996 10:588
 Why should Camby waste his time playing for a bunch of hired mercenaries?
 Let Magic play instead. He obviously just can't get enough hoops to satisfy
 his insatiable ego. If they take a college player they'll probably take
 Ray Allen given he was the MVP in the worlds last year. If they take two
 the second would probably be Duncan.

 mike
77.2092aLL PROSTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass will run the table - 38-0!Tue Feb 20 1996 13:223
    Word is that no college player will be selected.
    
    NAZZ
77.20933 to 6LUDWIG::BARBIERITue Feb 20 1996 13:308
      I'm real curious as to the rankings in the 3-6 range as UMass/
      Kentucky look to have 1 and 2 locked unless something unforeseen
      happens.
    
      UConn just went down to Georgetown.  Villanova, Cinci, Kansas,
      UConn as 3 to 6?
    
    						Tony
77.2094and Magic?HBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Tue Feb 20 1996 13:375
>    Word is that no college player will be selected.

What's the Word on Magic making it?

TTom
77.2095USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Feb 20 1996 14:0916
>      I'm real curious as to the rankings in the 3-6 range
>      Villanova, Cinci, Kansas, UConn as 3 to 6?

I think that's the concensus Tony.

IMO, Kansas is the clear-cut #3 team and will get a #1 seed somewhere.
I think #4 is totally up for grabs between the other 3, and will be
decided by the conference tournaments.

We've read that the NCAA tournament committee may be inclined to put
UMass and Kentucky in Regions where they cannot meet until the Championship
game.  I'm not convinced that that is in UMass' best interest.  I think
Kansas is the team that has the best shot at beating UMass.  Pollard
and Lafrenz should have Camby's head spinning (ie: who do I pick up ?),
and neither Dingle nor Bright can handle their size.  In the backcourt,
Vaughn-Haase are a tough match-up for Padilla-Travieso.
77.2096CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Feb 20 1996 14:3011
  According to the Globe the dream team will be all pro and Magic will be
considered along with everyone else. They seem to think that the fact that he's
a power forward these days will work to his advantage. They said that there
will be no token college players this time around. 

  Last time it took the better part of one scrimmage game for the NBA players
to remember how to hit a seam in a zone. As for defense they just play man
to man and it's so effective no foreign team seems to be able to score more
than 40 or 50 points per game.

  George
77.2097XTATIC::CHILDSHarry Browne for President!Tue Feb 20 1996 14:422
 With his endorsment$$$$$$$$$$$$$ po$$iblitie$ I think Magic i$ a $hoo-in......
77.2098Camby no token, NBA no shoo-inAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellTue Feb 20 1996 14:5612
    Well I don't necessarily think it will be as easy as George thinks and
    I don't recall it being that easy all of the time, especially in the
    worlds.  Barkley was a big key in 92 and Shaq in the worlds.
    
    I simply think that they should seriously think of a player like Camby
    for whom there isn't anyone in the nba right now who has his all
    around, pure basketball talents - I mean speed,shot blocking combined
    with passing and shooting at the 6'11 level (maybe Hakeem).
    
    I wouldn't want Camby as a token only because the U.S. wanted to put
    the best team on the court.  Another player I would add because of his
    unique talents is Abdul-Rauf.
77.2099USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Feb 20 1996 16:493
>    Well I don't necessarily think it will be as easy as George thinks

They could each wear one eye patch and the final score wouldn't be affected.
77.2100USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Feb 20 1996 18:507
ESPNET Sportzone's seeding predictions have moved Syracuse to the Southeast
as the #4 seed.  That puts them in position for a Sweet-16 rematch with
UMass.

I don't have much respect for these bozos though.  They just made Kansas
a #2 seed this week (up from a #3).  Meanwhile, three ACC school have
#2 or #3 seeds (Wake, GT, NC).
77.2101looking betterHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Tue Feb 20 1996 19:003
Georgia Tech has moved into the Top 16 in power rating, FWIW.

TTom
77.2102IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Feb 20 1996 19:053
>Georgia Tech has moved into the Top 16 in power rating, FWIW.

There you go trying to apply NASCAR "statistics" to other sports...
77.2103WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Feb 20 1996 19:574
    
    UMASS goin' dowwwwwnnnnnnnnnn tonight!  :^)
    
    - Sean
77.2104ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerTue Feb 20 1996 21:226
77.2105IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Feb 21 1996 11:541
I had no idea the Boston area extended out to Amherst...
77.2106CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Feb 21 1996 11:563
  UMASS extends into Boston.

  George
77.2107IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Feb 21 1996 12:054
>  UMASS extends into Boston.

Yes, but UMass/Boston has their own teams.  Groaner's attacks were on the
UMass/Amherst team.
77.2108UMass undefeated will play in the East, fer shureAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellWed Feb 21 1996 13:0012
    I don't see anyway the number one seed gets moved (in this case out of
    the East) without one of those rules coming into play.  I don't recall
    seeing it happen before.  Wasn't UCLA the #1 seed last year and didn't
    they stay in the East.
    
    The NCAA has their billion dollar contract they don't have to fool
    around matching Mass and Kentucky for audience appeal for another
    several years when the next contract comes up for renewal.  If
    speculation is out there that they'd play regional musical chairs for
    ratings points and there isn't any money in it in the first place then
    just for spite they'll do the opposite, the danged hyprocrital
    buzzards.
77.2109An awful awful gameMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Feb 21 1996 14:1914
    
      On the one hand you'd like to believe that UMass really 
     does have a 'Refuse To Lose' attitude and that teams are
     hyped for the Minutemen. But on the other hand you have to
     wonder about them when they play close game after close game
     against teams that an undefeated number one team should
     handle with ease. Games like last night's don't bode well
     for the tournament. It's practically March and UMass sleep-
     walked through a game. Marcus tried to do too much, Dingle
     and Bright didn't try to do enough and Edgar Padilla threw up
     some of the worst bricks I've ever seen. UMass when they play
     full out can and has beaten everybody. They play like they
     did last night and they're out of the tourney real quick.
     
77.2110WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Feb 21 1996 14:2618
    
    Tom, 
    
    URI's better than most think.  UMass has trampelled teams
    they should have, but URI deserved to be close - they're
    an almost-there team.  2 close games with UMass and 
    remember, they beat Xavier, which battled with UMass.
    Too bad they're probably NIT bound.
    
    Maybe I don't watch enough of UMass - I've seen more than
    3, but not a ton - but why is Camby getting so much press.
    Every time I watch it seems like UMass can thank their 
    lucky stars for Padilla/Travieso.
    
    Btw, Does Calipari always complain all night like that, or was
    it just a particularly tough game for him?  
    
    - Sean
77.2111I'm Certainly Not Overly OptimisticLUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Feb 21 1996 14:4614
      I didn't see the game, but I have been thoughtful of the close
      games as well.  It seems UMass's play is proportional to the
      quality of their opponent.  The better the team, the better 
      they play.
    
      But, there have been so many close games that were UMass to
      play any one of the top 6 or 8 seeds, I'm sure not thinking
      there is much (if any) better than a 50/50 shot that they win.
    
      In fact, if I was forced to bet, I'd definitely take Kentucky
      and I'd probably take Kansas and UConn.  I wouldn't feel good
      about Cinci either.
    
    						Tony
77.2112Like their chancesMROA::HEIER_LWed Feb 21 1996 15:0817
    I believe its for the best that UMASS plays close games.  They are
    winning games just like the 76 Indiana team or the 78-79 Indiana St.
    team.
    
    Teams that blow everyone out all year seem to have troubles in the NCAA
    tournament when confronted with a tough game.  UNLV never had a close
    game in 1990 until they lost to Duke and many of the Kentucky teams
    over the last couple years have blown out everyone but lost when it
    counts.
    
    I really like UMASS chances.  Weeks stepped it up big last night and
    Charlton Clarke play well but NEEDS more PT before the tournament.
    The defense for UMASS was poor last night and Rhode Island deserves
    a NCAA bid but will have to beat Temple next and make it to atleast
    the semi's of the A10 tournament (if not the finals).
    
    Larry
77.2113Nice to watch Dicky and the 'cats but all in all...AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellWed Feb 21 1996 16:3510
    It's too bad ESPN feels it has to lock itself in early for its choice
    of the deuce or the home channel for these games.  It did show the last
    30 seconds or so.
    
    Re. Calipari and his bickering.  UMass seems to be getting the calls
    this year, perhaps winning itself does that.  That was a nice no call
    on the last steal and perhaps correct but not something you can count
    on.  Camby seems to have been staying out of foul trouble all year,
    partly because he's concentrating on doing just that but the officials
    have to cooperate.  And that's as far as I'm going, Roland.
77.2114MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Feb 21 1996 17:4215
    
   >> I believe its for the best that UMASS plays close games.  They are
   >> winning games just like the 76 Indiana team or the 78-79 Indiana St.
   >> team.
    
      The '76 Indiana team played in the Big Ten. The '78-'79 ISU
      team didn't win the national title. UMass is playing squeakers 
      against teams with losing records (Xavier, etc.). I'd agree that 
      hard fought games against tough comp does make you battle hardened 
      for the NCAA tourney. But sleepwalking through games against inferior
      teams can't be at all beneficial. The whole starting five seemed 
      be in a funk last night especially Dingle. I'd never have thought
      when he was a frosh that he'd blosson into such a non-factor off-
      ensively. It's especially surprising for a New York City kid
      like himself. 
77.2115Coach Cal's gotta give it a restTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass will run the table - 38-0!Wed Feb 21 1996 18:549
    For my money, Calipari whines way too much.  He should just shut up and
    let his team play.
    
    I stated last week that I was more worried about URI than I was about
    Virginia Tech.  Skinner has done a very nice job with a real young
    team.  Rhody is one solid rebounder away from being a national
    contender, and they have everybody coming back next year.
    
    NAZZ
77.2116AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellWed Feb 21 1996 18:579
    It would have been nice to watch both Kentucky and UMass last night to
    contrast the two.  UMass has more talent in the top 6 but Kentucky has
    talent 1 - 10 and the constant pressure is effective.  KU probably
    can't handle UM inside but as we saw in the earlier match that depth
    can keep them in the game. The 40 minute college limit is probably KU's
    biggest problem.
    
    Even Alabama height and size was a big problem last night but Alabama
    couldn't shoot to save themselves.
77.2117SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Wed Feb 21 1996 19:427
    
    	I like Umass and hope the go all the way. However Kentucky beats
    Umass by 15 pts in the rematch. Umass played Kentucky the 1st game
    of the season, when Kentucky was a bunch of individual players. The
    egos are in the background and Kentucky is playing like a team now.
    
    Ron
77.2118GW next - bewareAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellWed Feb 21 1996 20:1010
    Kentuck still has to get some boards and not only Camby but Tyrone
    Weeks wrecked havoc on them.  A lot of the driving to the basket is
    null and void with Camby around although it might still be a good
    strategy.  If Camby blocked 15 in the first half and picked up 3 fouls
    it might be a worthwhile trade and with Camby in foul trouble perhaps a
    sizable deficit could be made up.
    
    So many said Va. Tech might be the game, Nazz said URI and I said
    George Washington (hey where's that essay?  Looks like 'Saw took the
    day off to prepare it).
77.2119USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 22 1996 14:3110
Someone said Rhode Island *SHOULD* get an NCAA bid.  I don't see ANY
justification for it.  To-date, their accomplishments are beating
Temple, and losing close games to UMass (twice) and Va Tech.  Whoopee !!!
Meanwhile, they've lost to Dayton, St. Bonnie's, St. Joe's, PROVIDENCE
(who most A-10 guys say doesn't have a chance of getting into the NCAA),
and Syracuse by 26 !  (a team Nazz says "sucks")

George Washington is the A-10's only chance for a 3rd team (IMO), and
their only impressive wins are over Va Tech and Temple.  They've gotten
beat any time they've played a good non-conference team.
77.2120WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Feb 26 1996 12:3911
    
    
      MIGHTY QUIET in here today!!!
    
    
         Massachusetts Hospitals have announced a wide spread amount of
    broken ankles throughout the state.
    
                       
    
        People jumping off the bandwagon doncha know!!    
77.2121XTATIC::CHILDSHarry Browne for President!Mon Feb 26 1996 13:0216
 Don't see anyone jumping off. I for one didn't expect them to go undfeated
 nor did many of the true followers. It was the guys in here who don't root
 for them that kept claiming that they'd go undfeated. GOing undefeated in
 conference play is dam tough no matter how weak the conference may be and
 I for one don't see the A-10 as being all that weak. Out of conference
 besides UMASS, GW and Temple have beaten some highly ranked teams. As a 
 side note to how tough it is to win in-conference just ask the stinkin'
 cowboys about the REDSKINS..........

 Better to loose now than in the Tournment. What I don't understand is why
 Kentucky gets to be number 1 now. UMASS beat then convicingly. If it had 
 been a close game than I could see it but they lost by 10. My opinion is that
 the pollsters just wanted to make their pre-season predicton look good.

 mike
77.2122MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Feb 26 1996 13:498
    
    
     I said in .2109 and .2114 that I thought UMass has been flat
    lately so the loss didn't surprise me all that much. The only
    thing I like'd about Saturday's game is that Bruiser Flint used 
    much more of the bench than Coach Cal ever does. 
     
     
77.2123USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 26 1996 14:1817
I have the utmost respect for the GW program and coach Jarvis.  Their
win against UMass on the road should be enough by itself to put them
in the NCAA tourney, but their non-conference schedule doesn't support
it (no wins against a ranked team):


George Washington (17-5)

Nov. 24         George Washington 81, Hartford 69
Dec. 2          Florida 75, George Washington 66
Dec. 3          Maryland 98, Geo Washington 81
Dec. 5          George Washington 76, James Madison 68
Dec. 9          George Washington 71, South Florida 69
Dec. 27         Geo Washington 98, Cal St. Sacramento 81
Dec. 28         George Washington 84, Idaho 83
Jan. 13         Missouri 92, Geo Washington 77
Feb. 5          Geo Washington 72, NC Charlotte 67
77.2124Now we can get down to BusinessCOPS01::MARTINMon Feb 26 1996 18:5914
    I agree Mike.  This loss will take a lot of pressure off of this team
    during tournament time.  This team can now fully concentrate on winning
    a national championship without the "distraction" of running the table.
    UMASS is now ranked #2 behind Kentucky.  Kentucky was really the only
    choice to replace UMASS as the #1 team and I'm sure that the reasoning
    is that this is a "different" Kentucky team than the one that lost to
    the Minutemen in November.  
    
    Also GW is now ranked in the top 25.  They may not have any impressive
    out of conference wins but they do have victories over UMASS and VA
    Tech within the conference and they will count towards their NCAA
    Bid.
    
    Thomas
77.2125USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Feb 26 1996 19:2215
>    I agree Mike.  This loss will take a lot of pressure off of this team
>    during tournament time.  This team can now fully concentrate on winning
>    a national championship without the "distraction" of running the table.

Exactly.  IMO, they had no shot at the title if they had entered the
tournament unbeaten.  Now the only question is can they stop playing
this recent, somewhat sloppy ball and use the loss to focus on execution ?


>    UMASS is now ranked #2 behind Kentucky.  Kentucky was really the only
>    choice to replace UMASS as the #1 team and I'm sure that the reasoning
>    is that this is a "different" Kentucky team than the one that lost to
>    the Minutemen in November.  

Naaa, polls are always "what have you done lately".
77.2126ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerMon Feb 26 1996 20:1714
77.2127MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Feb 27 1996 11:5111
    A choke is losing to a total SHOME team, if GW has beaten them the
    last 4 meetings I'd say the GW Coach knows something the other
    coaches don't, and he takes advantage of that knowledge everytime ?
    
    Kentucky has 1 loss, Umass has 1 loss, I can argue both ways, seeing
    as UMASS beat Kentuckey they should be #1 or Seeing as Kentucky's only
    loss came to the #2 ranked team and Umass was to the #24 ? Ranked team
    then Kentucky should be #1.... Won't make much difference when Kentucky
    loses another game :-)
    
    								MairB
77.2128CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Tue Feb 27 1996 11:5614
>    A choke is losing to a total SHOME team, if GW has beaten them the
                                  ^^^^^

WTF is a "SHOME" team????


I'm gettin' dizzy.  The spin control in here is rivaling that of ACC Chris
on his best days.

Whew!  I'd better sit down before I have a Camby-like faint.


'Saw
77.2129SNAX::ERICKSONCan the Coach...Tue Feb 27 1996 13:1414
    
    	Good old Rick Pitino is trying to deflate being ranked #1. He did
    the old they have 1 loss, we have 1 loss, and they beat us, they should
    still be ranked #1. He then went on to say, the rankings don't matter
    in college basketball, the tourney decides the champion. Yet, it does
    help if you get a #1 seed, conceding that the higher you are seeded in
    the tourney gives you a little advantage. In terms of the number of
    difficult games you have to play. The odds are with the #1 seed making
    it to the Sweet 16. If there is an upset somewhere, you might have an
    easy time getting to the Elite 8. Leaving you with 3 tough games to
    win the Championship. If your seeded #8, you have tough games right
    from the beginning.
    
    Ron
77.2130USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Feb 27 1996 13:364
>    If your seeded #8, you have tough games right from the beginning.

Unless you're NC, in which case you STILL get easy games right up to
the Elite-8.
77.2131choke opHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Tue Feb 27 1996 13:529
Yeah but that's what you want for NC.

They choke against inferior teams. Always have and always will as long as
Dean is around. Check out the Florida St game for reference.

But, make no mistake about it, ever time the seeds come out it looks like
the committee was made up of Tar Heels.

TTom
77.2132as in 1994AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellTue Feb 27 1996 14:122
    Except when they were slated in 94 to play the winner of Wash. St. and
    BC and BC set off Dean to new records on the whiner scale.
77.2133XTATIC::CHILDSHarry Browne for President!Tue Feb 27 1996 14:513
 not to defend NC or anything like that but I would say in recent years Duke
 has gotten the best seedings of anyone...........
77.2134Duke in on da fix, IIHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Tue Feb 27 1996 14:565
Duke is just as much in on the fix as No Carolina. They get as many
calls and as many breaks which I enjoy cause it bother them faux Heel
fans, bad.

TTom
77.2135CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Tue Feb 27 1996 15:204
Is anyone on the Duke staff or UNC staff related to Dale Earnhardt or
Richard Petty?

Or is it just a regional conspiracy thang?
77.2136If'n he's still alive, that is... or maybe even if not...EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelTue Feb 27 1996 15:2311
    
> Is anyone on the Duke staff or UNC staff related to Dale Earnhardt or
> Richard Petty?
> 
> Or is it just a regional conspiracy thang?
    
    Yes.  Undoubtedly Jesse Helms is at the puppet strings...
    
    
    glenn
    
77.2137CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Feb 27 1996 15:267
RE            <<< Note 77.2136 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN "Pride of Steel" >>>

>    Yes.  Undoubtedly Jesse Helms is at the puppet strings...
    
  No doubt, but question is, the top end or the bottom end?

  George
77.2138seen wierderHBAHBA::HAASExtra low prices and hepatitis too!~Tue Feb 27 1996 15:338
Not trying to be political but it's worth mentioning that in response to
the Cubans, Clinton agreed to work with Jess Helms on his bill to try to
maximize Jesse's contributions from the Sugar Industry while attempting
to choke out ol' Castro.

Once again, truth is stranger than fiction...

TTom
77.2139what's with this team ?USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Feb 29 1996 13:211
Will UMass' A-10 championships run be broken this year ?
77.2140MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Feb 29 1996 17:2427
    
      Coach Cal's insistence on going with just six players and
     on rare occasions seven all season long is blowing up in his 
     face. The Minutemen are burning out, sliding into the tournament 
     by squeaking out games against teams that the Kentuckys and
     Kansases of the NCAA world would beat by 50 points at this
     point in the season. Even last night according to the Globe, 
     he started all the seniors for Senior Night but threw in his 
     regulars when the score was just 2-2. It's just another symptom 
     like his constant whining of his tendency to micro-manage. What 
     a refreshing change the GW loss was if only because Coach Cal was 
     in the lockerroom  and Bruiser Flint was "crazy" enough to let 
     Nunez and Clark and Weeks play real minutes. Charlton Clark 
     got to show a little of what he can do though not enough and GW 
     was bit thrown by the subs if only temporarily. Even in blowouts 
     Coach Cal has waited to until the final minute to let his scrubs
     play. We might as well resign ourselves to the realization that 
     Coach Cal and UMass aren't going to win the national title in this 
     their best chance. Not with fatigue (mental and physical) settling 
     in and the team sliding backwards. Coach Cal is solely responsible 
     for UMass being no. 1 for nine weeks and he made them a national 
     power but he hasn't gotten them ready to make a real run at the 
     national title in March and I tend to think that they're going to 
     fall well short. Tomorrow is March and Umass is going in the wrong
     direction.
    
    
77.2141PHHSS1::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Thu Feb 29 1996 20:385
    Coach Cal had Nunez in last night at the end of the game. It was
    Nunez's acting job that helped Mass tie the game with the totally bogus
    intentional foul call, or UMASS would have lost two games in a row.
    
    
77.2142GLRMAI::WILKESThu Feb 29 1996 20:437
    re 2140
    
    I think you may be right about UMass being worn out.
    
    I read an interesting article the other day about how Cinicinati players are
    openly complaining of burnout due to Huggins coaching techniques. UMass
    starting 5 may be experiencing the same thing.
77.2143WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Mar 01 1996 10:336
    
    Good analyis there, Tommy...
    
    You're starting to sound like me when I talk about the Pats... :^)
    
    - Sean
77.2144USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Mar 01 1996 13:016
>   I read an interesting article the other day about how Cinicinati players are
>   openly complaining of burnout due to Huggins coaching techniques. UMass
>   starting 5 may be experiencing the same thing.

I saw the end of the Cin-Memphis game last night, and even though they won,
I won't bank on the Bearcats making the Final Four.
77.2145ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY WinnerFri Mar 01 1996 13:244
77.2146Where Is The Running On Offense???LUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Mar 06 1996 16:3618
      I was talking to a friend at work today and he lodged a couple
      complaints toward UMass' style of play.
    
      1) He said that when they inbound the ball against a full court
         pressing team that they take the time to set up their own
         offense for attacking a press and they NEVER take the ball
         out real fast so as to attack the press before it is set up.
    
      2) He said they almost never attempt to convert a defensive rebound
         to a running transition basket.  Little to no running.
    
      What do you think?  Is it possible these are accuarate observations
      (they seem so to me), but they are purposely done so as not to tire
      out the guards?
    
      It is a bummer seeing how few fast break baskets UMass gets.
    
    						Tony
77.2147Now if he could DO something about the weatherAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Mar 07 1996 14:4417
    Calipari was in the Glove today - (do they ever miss a day talking
    about some aspect of UMass season?  Did some editor say "Everyday,
    something about UMass! We've got to shut them up.").  He's talking
    about physical play and how his team plays real basketball but the Big
    East has a lot of contact.
    
    But I think the real point is that Coach Cal is trying to set up the
    refs for the ncaas to come.  He wants to somehow build the impression
    that UMass doesn't foul but those teams that do have to be called. 
    Unsaid is the message to refs that they don't have keep the foul
    statistics balanced.
    
    The Camby - Okla St. nightmare is recursing thru his dreams still.  All
    these technicals and tv spots (said same thing he said today in globe)
    and interviews are his attempt to do something about it.
    
    Billte
77.2148CNTROL::CHILDSHarry Browne for President!Thu Mar 07 1996 14:5213
Next thing you know he'll be walking out on the court
to point out the quilty players (of over-agressive
physical play) ala Dean. Which is something he needs
to watchout for because he does love to get his feet
on the court or out of the coaches' box. The A-10 guys
put up with it but come tourney time someone might feel
the need to slap a T on him. Certainly he's not the
only coach quilty of this. I really wish the refs would
enforce it better. I really don't understand why the
coaches feel the need to do this. Why do the feel the
need to push the refs?

mike
77.2149Cal feels only the refs can stop him(?)AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Mar 07 1996 14:599
    Mike I think Cal looked back on his last game last year with Camby
    picking up the fouls 2,3,4 in an instant and his title hopes down the
    drain and felt helpless.  He asked himself "What can I do to keep this
    happening again?".  He surely felt he didn't do enough, didn't even get
    a T that game, wasn't prepared.
    
    He's trying to draw a line in the sand, trying to establish a cause and
    effect with the refs eg "Do this [again] to me and all hell will break
    loose".  Or in the most simple terms get an edge.
77.2150Reduce Dumb FoulsGLRMAI::WILKESThu Mar 07 1996 15:398
    Coach Cal ought to redirect his efforts towards getting his players to
    avoid totally dopey fouls in big games such as the one Camby committed
    against Louisville lest week trying to steal a smaller player's dribble
    at in the mid-court area.
    
    Camby needs to use his fouls defensively in the paint where they can
    really count for something.
    
77.2151deep thoughtsWONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Mar 07 1996 15:5316
    
> enforce it better. I really don't understand why the
> coaches feel the need to do this. Why do the feel the
> need to push the refs?
    
    I hate that junk too.  Pitino is the king of stepping
    on the court - it's almost like he does it just to 
    show he has the power to.  How can the 10 inches of
    court space he gains help him coach better?  Why can't
    he stay behind the line?
    
    Why do refs let coaches get away with things?  Are they
    being told to let the big names get away with things
    for the success of the game?
    
    - Sean
77.2152MKOTS3::SMILLERThu Mar 07 1996 16:373
    
    
    UMASS 58 ....  St B's  42.  9:29 left to go in the game
77.2153And the game is on tape delay!!!!!TNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Fri Mar 08 1996 14:177
    Carmelo was incredible in the first half.  Hit 8 of his first 9 shots,
    and never touched iron!  UMass coasted in the 2nd half.
    
    Big test tonight vs. GW.  I'd love to stomp the smarmy grin of that
    bald geek's head.
    
    NAZZ
77.2154WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Mar 08 1996 14:352
    
    Go RAMS!  :^)
77.2155Ya man he's ugly, but he sure can coachAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellFri Mar 08 1996 14:391
    
77.2156IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Mar 08 1996 15:057
>I'd love to stomp the smarmy grin of that
>bald geek's head.

He's grinning because he does a better job against UMass
than anyone else.  I would be, too.

And the guy is a hell of a coach - I wish he coached at SU...
77.2157What time tonite?MROA::HEIER_LFri Mar 08 1996 16:353
    When's the UMASS game tonite?
    
    Larry
77.2158It'll be tape delayedMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Mar 08 1996 16:442
    
      UMass plays at 7 but it won't be televised until 10.
77.21597pmAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellFri Mar 08 1996 16:494
    7pm start at philedelphia but as someone said, there's some kind of tv
    conflict.  It says here that the ACC 7pm is on the deuce (Wake-Va) and
    Georgetown - Villanova on ESPN.  Perhaps it's SportsChannel showing the
    Celtics at 7:30.
77.2160And has. Four times in a row.MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Mar 08 1996 17:515
    
  >> I'd love to stomp the smarmy grin of that bald geek's head.
    
     So would Calipari. Unfortunately, Jarvis can coach rings around him.
    
77.2161WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Mar 08 1996 18:027
    
    Count me on that, too.  I really respect Jarvis.  I remember watching
    the NCAA games he coached BU in (was that the only time BU has gone?).
    
    And I definitely agree with Roland - I'd love to have him at Syracuse.
    
    - Sean
77.2162IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Mar 08 1996 18:123
I met Jarvis when he was coach at Cambridge Rindge & Latin in the late '70s
(Patrick Ewing was the team's center).  He seemed like a nice enough guy as
well as an excellent coach.
77.2163what a bummer...USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Mar 08 1996 18:254
>    And I definitely agree with Roland - I'd love to have him at Syracuse.

He's the 1st person I thought of when the NCAA investigation of Syracuse
began.  I was sure Bummer would have to resign, or would get fired.
77.2164Despite the toughest region, UMass will prevailTNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Mon Mar 11 1996 14:1212
    
Seems to me like UMass got the screws put to them by the committee.  The East
is by far the toughest region.  Bradley and Stanford were both considered
5-6 seeds before losing a tournament game (Bradley) and a couple of late
regular season games (Stanford).  Marquette and Penn State are the second 
best teams in their conference.  North Carolina is North Carolina.  New
Mexico won the WAC.  Texas Tech is the only other team besides UMass that 
has lost only one game all season.  And despite the incredibly incompetent
coaching job John Thompson did in the Big East finals, Georgetown is definitely
a national championship contender.  It's a tough road to the Final Four.

NAZZ
77.2165MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Mar 11 1996 14:2814
  >> The East is by far the toughest region. 

     No way. UMass has an an easy road to the Elite Eight. Probably 
     the easiest of the four No. 1s. The toughest division looks like 
     the Southeast. In the Southeast UConn starts off with Colgate but 
     could face Duke in the second game and then could face either UCLA 
     or Miss. St. after that. Either of those two could knock off UConn 
     and it wouldn't be a major upset. Bradley, Stanford and PSU are all
     nice teams that UMass should beat with ease. Marquette is a bit scary
     but UMass at its best is way too much for Marquette. UMass should
     get all the way to the Elite Eight where they'll meet their first 
     really big challenge in Georgetown and Alan Iverson. 
     
    
77.2166WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Mar 11 1996 15:2021
77.2167CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Mar 11 1996 15:2813
  Doesn't matter who gets selected to what spot. With the 1 game elimination
format it's 90% dumb luck as to who wins. Why do you think each year the winner
of just about every March Madness pool in the country is some secretary who
hasn't seen a basketball game since she was a cheerleader in highschool. 

  Gil Santos, sports guy from WBZ Radio, said today that he's never won the
WBZ pool. He said it's almost always won by some some fashion editor named
Diane who works upstairs. The sports guys are always out early.

  That contest to take the quarter off the top of the backboard would be better
at picking a national champion than this tournament.

  George
77.2168IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Mar 11 1996 15:304
>With the 1 game elimination
>format it's 90% dumb luck as to who wins.

Make sure you get in a pool, then...
77.2169half right, anywayHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedMon Mar 11 1996 15:356
>With the 1 game elimination
>format it's 90% dumb luck as to who wins.
                 ^^^^ ^^^^


George, we know your credentials, but are you lucky, too? :=]
77.2170MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Mon Mar 11 1996 15:429
The charm of the NCAA tournament is the Cinderella stories that
develop each years.  The best games to watch are the David vs.
Goliath where upsets are possible.

Two games stand out to me as some of the most enjoyable were
Princeton-Georgetown, and the Villanova-Georgetown final.  There
is more drama in the NCAA than the NBA could ever hope to have.

Mike
77.2171CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Mar 11 1996 16:019
  I never win those thing but Patty does fairly well.

  A few years back her office had a bunch of College BB fans and they ran
a pool. As I recall she picked Duke because she thought this kid Christian
Latner was kind of cute and ended up winning the whole thing.

  I'm not sure if she ever went to a basketball game.

  George
77.2172The Super Bowl must be 'dumb luck', tooMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Mar 11 1996 16:4110
    
      No one cares what Patty did in her office pool. And no one cares
     to hear your NCAA "dumb luck" spiel again. It's March and the best
     event on the sports calendar is at hand. Michelle Kwan was in the
     paper the other day and she said (I'm not making this up) that she
     found that if she wanted to compete at the Olympic level she'd have
     to learn how to apply her makeup better. Maybe you could give her some
     pointers.
     
    
77.2173CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Mar 11 1996 16:489
  Whooooooo, struck a nerve did I.

  If it's the best tournament around, then why do those people who understand
what's going on have no more luck than than those who don't picking a winner?

  You might as well try to analyze 64 guys flipping coins. The relationship
between that analysis and the outcome would be about the same.

  George
77.2174MYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Mon Mar 11 1996 16:558
If you define "best tournament" as the one with the most drama,
emotion, excitment, and the least predictability, then the NCAA
is it.

It may not have the best athletes in the world, but it produces
the best games.

Mike
77.2175Not whining if you look at the numbersSUBSYS::KNIAGERMon Mar 11 1996 17:0827
    re: .2166
    
    Referencing the top 25 from the CNN poll, here is how they fall into
    the brackets.
    
    East - UMass (1), Georgetown (5), Texas Tech (7), Penn St. (18),
           Marquette (22), UNC (24), Stanford (25)
    
    Midwest - Kentucky (2), Wake Forest (9), Utah (10), Villanova (12),
              Iowa St (16), Va. Tech (21), Louisville (23)
    
    Southeast - UConn (3), Cincinnati (6), UCLA (13), Georgia Tech (15),
                Mississippi St (20)
    
    West - Purdue (4), Kansas (8), Arizona (11), Syracuse (14), 
           Memphis (17), Iowa (19)
    
    
    Things to look at.  The East has 7 of the top 25 teams and 3 from the
    top 7.  The West has 7 from the top 25 and 3 from the top 10.  The
    Southeast has only 5 from the top 25 and 2 in the top 10.  The West has
    6 in the top 25 and two in the top 10.  
    
    I don't see how anyone can say that we UMass alums are whining without
    cause.
    
    Alan
77.2176CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Mar 11 1996 17:216
  Your whining without cause.
    
  If a team is really better than the other 63 then it shouldn't matter which
teams they play, they should be able to beat any of them any time.

  George
77.2177MIMS::ROLLINS_RMon Mar 11 1996 17:252
	I suppose you would think the Bulls were whining if they were required
	to play Orlando in the first round, while Atlanta played Charlotte.
77.2178It's not just numbers...IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Mar 11 1996 17:2620
The selection committee also has to worry about making sure teams don't
play on their home floor, and at the same time trying to keep a semblance of
"regionality" about the arrangement, as well as trying to balance things out
as best they can.  This year, they also had the unenviable job of trying to
do this with two very highly ranked teams logging (quasi-) surprise losses
hours before the announcement.  Every year, people complain about the
seedings/locations, and every year, it works itself out on the floor.

UMass is about as good as it gets this year.  You have a great team.  *Revel*
in it.  Stop worrying about the hairline differences in competition - there
are a lot of other factors more worthy of worry.  Root for your team to kick
butt and take names - it's that much sweeter when the competition is tough.

If you think there's a big difference between the East and the Midwest, you
spend way too much time squinting...

I'm mainly ragging on Nazz because a guy with "37-1" in his p-name doesn't
look too good complaining about the level of competition being slightly
higher.
77.2179IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Mar 11 1996 17:2911
>	I suppose you would think the Bulls were whining if they were required
>	to play Orlando in the first round, while Atlanta played Charlotte.

So, Rich, do you really feel that the regions are *this* mismatched?

The only one I think of as "weak" is the West.  And that's only because we
couldn't give them more Eastern teams... :-)  My Orange even have a slight
chance of coming out of there - they're a good team, but they're not that good -
to me, that *proves* it's weak.

And even then, Purdue and Kansas aren't analogous to Atlanta and Charlotte...
77.2180Just using #'s versus opinionsSUBSYS::KNIAGERMon Mar 11 1996 17:328
    re: -.2176
    
    I was just showing that the polls do not agree with Sean's assessment
    of the brackets.  And by your logic there is no need to even have the
    tournament, because the #1 team in the country is automatically going
    to win.  Not!  The whole point is that the tougher your schedule the
    better the odds that you could lose.  Even if you don't lose, you may
    have to work harder to win leaving you worn down for the next game.
77.2181CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Mar 11 1996 17:4221
RE                     <<< Note 77.2177 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

>	I suppose you would think the Bulls were whining if they were required
>	to play Orlando in the first round, while Atlanta played Charlotte.

  Yes.

  In all likely hood it wouldn't matter when Orlando played Chicago, who ever
won would eventually win the whole thing unless some lesser team pulled off
an upset truly worth that distinction.

  The reason for seeding a tournament is to make it more interesting to the
fans. In a large tournament like the NBA final it would be dull to have one
of the best teams kill off the other in April then try to maintain interest
as that team chewed through easier teams in late may and June.

  If you are the best team it shouldn't matter what order you play the teams
or which ones you meet head to head. You should be able to beat any of them
in any round.

  George
77.2182CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Mar 11 1996 17:4820
RE                     <<< Note 77.2180 by SUBSYS::KNIAGER >>>

>    And by your logic there is no need to even have the
>    tournament, because the #1 team in the country is automatically going
>    to win.  

  No, I never said that and this does not follow from anything I said.

  You play a tournament because there is always the chance of either an
upset in which a lesser team beats the better team or it may be that the
evaluations of the teams are wrong in the 1st place.

>Not!  The whole point is that the tougher your schedule the
>    better the odds that you could lose.  Even if you don't lose, you may
>    have to work harder to win leaving you worn down for the next game.

  If you want to go away calling yourself the best, you should welcome that
challenge.

  George
77.2183USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Mar 11 1996 18:1213
IMO, the Southeast is the toughest Region, when looking at the #1-8 seeds.
I also agree that UMass has the easiest road to the Regional Finals (ie:
Elite Eight).  Bradley/Stanford won't give them as much trouble as Xavier
did.  And the #4-5 seeds (Marq-PSU) are the weakest of all the brackets
(Utah-Iowa St, UCLA-Miss St, Syracuse-Memphis)...which is the way it should
be for the #1 team in the country.

I do think Nazz is right, Georgetown is the best #2 in the tournament (Kansas
should be #1, what a joke making Purdue a #1).  They did UMass no favors
there.

BTW, did you notice that UMass would have to play Kentucky in the nat'l
semis, should they both get that far ?
77.2184Traveiso and Padilla are keyMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Mar 11 1996 18:5412
    
     
       Has anyone else noticed that Edgar Padilla, as the lone
      defender, defends the 2-on-1 or 3-on-1 fast break as well
      as anyone. He has an uncanny knack for faking the ball-
      handler and anticipating (often forcing) the direction 
      the pass is thrown. If Edgar can get on a little roll in 
      the tourney he'll be critical in helping UMass win a title. 
      If he can keep the rest of his game where it's been all 
      season and 40% of his threes in the bargain, UMass will
      put the opposition in a damned-if-you-do damned-if-you-don't
      position.
77.2185can't beat the 3'sUSCTR1::GARBARINOMon Mar 11 1996 19:486
>                       -< Traveiso and Padilla are key >-

Interesting that Travieso was the tourney MVP, but didn't make the
All-Conference team.  Every time I watch the guy he's on fire.
Can't see him not being more important than Padilla to UMass'
success.
77.2186SNAX::ERICKSONI'm tired of SNOW....Mon Mar 11 1996 20:2320
    
    	The only way to really look at which bracket is easier. Is looking
    at the top 4 seeds in each region. If a number 1 seed can't win its
    1st two games it shouldn't have been a #1 seed, same thing applies to
    a #2 and to some extent a #3 seed. Once your at the Sweet 16 level who
    do you have to play barring any upsets to make it to the final 4?
    Which team has the easier Sweet 16 and Elite 8 matchups, that is the
    easiest bracket?
    	Here are the potential sweet 16 matchups by bracket along side
    is the potential opponent to make it to the final 4.
    
    Purdue/Syracuse  vs Arizona/Kansas
    Uconn/UCLA       vs Georgia Tech/Cincinnati
    Umass/Marquette  vs Texas Tech/Georgetown
    Kentucky/Utah    vs Villanova/Wake Forest
    
        To me it looks like the West is easiest. With the other 3 pretty
    much equal.
    
    Ron
77.2187USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Mar 12 1996 13:2916
>    Purdue/Syracuse  vs Arizona/Kansas
>    Uconn/UCLA       vs Georgia Tech/Cincinnati
>    Umass/Marquette  vs Texas Tech/Georgetown
>    Kentucky/Utah    vs Villanova/Wake Forest

>        To me it looks like the West is easiest. With the other 3 pretty
>    much equal.


I know they had a great finish, but why is Marquette regarded as such
a power ?  And Texas Tech has to be the biggest unknown of the top
seeds.  I think UMass has the toughest #2 seed in Georgetown, but I
don't agree that Marq and Tex Tech are tougher than Syr-Ari, UCLA-GT,
or Utah-Vill.  And IMO Purdue as a #1 is the only reason why the
West *appears* to be the weakest Region.  Flip-flop them with Kansas
and I don't think it looks so bad.
77.2188If I were a secretary I'd be _highly_ insulted-- geez GeorgeEDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelWed Mar 13 1996 20:5711
> Doesn't matter who gets selected to what spot. With the 1 game elimination
> format it's 90% dumb luck as to who wins. Why do you think each year the winner
> of just about every March Madness pool in the country is some secretary who
> hasn't seen a basketball game since she was a cheerleader in highschool. 
    
    Even worse, last year I spent the entire college hoops season 
    following the baseball strike, and still won da pool... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
77.2189Being contrary involves turning one's own argument on its headEDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelWed Mar 13 1996 21:0414
> The reason for seeding a tournament is to make it more interesting to the
> fans. In a large tournament like the NBA final it would be dull to have one
> of the best teams kill off the other in April then try to maintain interest
> as that team chewed through easier teams in late may and June.
    
    That's totally and completely illogical, especially coming from a 
    guy who is so concerned with the variable of "luck" in athletic 
    competition.  You've just said that it wouldn't make any difference
    if they placed all the best teams in one bracket and the Cinderellas
    in another.  Run the probabilities.  It makes a big difference.
    
    glenn
    
77.2190Bracket Against One of The Weaker #2'sLUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Mar 18 1996 11:5014
      My opinion on UMass' seeding is very coarse.  Its this simple.
      UMass should not have to play the best #2 seed.  Maybe the 3rd
      or 4th beat of the #2's, but not the best.
    
      Presently, the power rankings have Cin and Georgetown as in the
      top five in the country.  UMass should have ended up against Kansas
      or Wake.  Meanwhile, Purdue was a total flop.  Cin should have had
      that #1.  Also, Texas Tech sure looked good yesterday and may have
      been seeded inaccurately.
    
      Texas Tech/Georgetown ought to be a heck of a game and should UMass
      prevail over Arkansas, the next game looks to be tough!
    
    							Tony
77.2191USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Mar 18 1996 12:244
>      Texas Tech/Georgetown ought to be a heck of a game and should UMass
>      prevail over Arkansas, the next game looks to be tough!

Tony, they're all tough from here on out.
77.2192don't look past to GeorgetownWONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Mar 18 1996 12:297
    
    The problem is, *everyone* should have prevailed over Arkansas.  I
    really overlooked them, I'll tell ya.  UMass, be afraid, be very
    afraid....
    
    - Sean
    
77.2193Arkansas, then G'Town(?)MROA::RSCHOTTMon Mar 18 1996 12:5619
         Hopefully, the one thing that UMass has learned the last two
    years in the Big Dance, is to play "one game at a time".  Given that
    Nolan Richardson is playing lots of freshmen, it's about time that the
    Hogs' bubble burst.  Richardson is evidently a lot better coach than I have
    given him credit for.  Of course he has taken his team to the Nat'l
    Championship game the last two seasons, winning one, but I based a lot
    of that on the talent he had to work with.  Taking this team, a team
    that arguably shouldn't even have made the final 64, to the Sweet 16
    convinces me of his abilities!
    
         Provided both UMass and Georgetown advance, next Saturday's
    matchup should be one hell of a game.  I've heard all the pundits
    favoring G'Town.  I know all about the argument that Georgetown with
    its widebodies inside and Iverson running the show, win the match ups with
    UMass.  I just know that UMass plays its best games when everyone says
    they are the underdog!
    
    Russ
                                                                
77.2194USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Mar 18 1996 13:0819
>    I've heard all the pundits favoring G'Town.

I'm sure they're not knocking UMass, Russ.  It's just that the #1 team
in the regular season rarely takes the tournament, and Georgetown seems
to have the right mix to beat UMass.  Too many big bodies for Camby alone
to deal with.  If Weeks and/or Norville don't have big games, they're
in trouble.  I don't think Bright or Dingle will flourish against these
guys...they just aren't big enough.  Aw should be able to silence Travieso
(see his gameS vs. Ray Allen), and Padilla will be playing the best PG
in America.  Of course, that PG has played his team right out of W's in
his brief collegiate career, but the team package is one that appears
to spell trouble for UMass.

I've said it before, the only teams that can beat UMass are Georgetown
and Kansas.  Of course, that means Kentucky will probably take 'em out
in the semis.

The expert on this potential UMass-Georgetown game should be MikeyC.
How do you see it Mike ?
77.2195Camby Better Show UpLUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Mar 18 1996 14:0320
      My main fear with Georgetown is Camby sometimes disappearing
      when matched up against someone really heavy.
    
      I think UMass will stand a solid chance just as long as Camby
      is a definite presence.  I am confident that UMass' defense
      will intimidate Georgetown as they intimidate everyone they
      play.
    
      But, the refs better not let Georgetown be thugs.  I can't see
      UMass winning if the game is allowed to get overly physical.
    
      Of course, this all assumes UMass beats Arkansas and thats an
      assumption I certainly am not willing to make what with the
      close game against Stanford.  It also assumes Georgetown prevails.
    
      One other thing...,man did Georgia Tech look good.  I'm not sure
      Iverson is better than Marbury.  And its not just Marbury, Barry
      looked good.  What a passing team!
    
    						Tony
77.2196EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelMon Mar 18 1996 14:3721
    
>      My opinion on UMass' seeding is very coarse.  Its this simple.
>      UMass should not have to play the best #2 seed.  Maybe the 3rd
>      or 4th beat of the #2's, but not the best.
    
    Georgetown over Kansas?  That's a stretch.  Kansas probably 
    should have been the #1 seed.  Georgetown didn't deserve the #1
    seed, and has been spotty enough that you can't say they are
    decisively better than the rest of the #2s.  Plain and simple,
    it's not the tournament committee's job to look at "potential"
    and team-vs-team matchups.  UMass got a regular season 
    conference non-champion, among other things...
    
    Arkansas has _talent_.  I expect their inexperience will catch up
    to them in the UMass game, but after seeing them both in person last 
    Thursday, it was clear that Arkansas had more pure talent, athletic 
    ability, than Marquette.  They may not shoot well but they will play
    tough defense against UMass (may not have an answer for Camby, though).
    
    glenn                                         
    
77.2197MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Mar 18 1996 15:2014
    
   >> Georgetown over Kansas?  That's a stretch.  Kansas probably 
   >> should have been the #1 seed.  Georgetown didn't deserve the #1
   >> seed, and has been spotty enough that you can't say they are
   >> decisively better than the rest of the #2s.  

      Georgetown is certainly better than Villanova and probably better
      than Cincinatti and Kansas ended the season with a loss as well.
      If the question is put as, "who would you rather play?" gimme
      Kansas. Georgetown not only can beat anyone left in the tourney
      they can blow up and embarass anyone left in the tourney.
    
      BTW - UConn will have their hands full with Misissippi State
            and will probably be the second #1 seed to fall.
77.2198'nuff saidROCK::GRONOWSKISPORTS 1995 NOTY &amp; RED_SOX Most Knowledgeable Noter Award!Mon Mar 18 1996 16:482
77.2199USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Mar 18 1996 17:1814
>    Cincinnati > Georgetown

That's easy to say when it's very unlikely that they'll play each other
in this tournament.  With Iverson and Page, I'll take Gtown over ANY team
that boasts of its frontline as their strength.  Gtown can match anyone's
frontline.


Tony, don't bet on UMass "intimidating" Georgetown.  I've never seen anyone
intimidate Georgetown.  I'd bank on thuggery from the Hoyas beforet thinking
they'll be intimidated.  And Georgetown hasn't been playing much thug-ball
this year.  IMO, Iverson and Page will determine who wins this game.
I don't see Camby dominating against this frontline.  They're all big,
and there's just too many of them.
77.2200ROCK::GRONOWSKISPORTS 1995 NOTY &amp; RED_SOX Most Knowledgeable Noter Award!Mon Mar 18 1996 18:532
77.2201What I Meant By...LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Mar 18 1996 19:3917
      What I meant by defensive intimidation is the UMass players playing
      'in your face' type defense and holding the opposition to less than
      a 40% shooting percentage.  I guess intimidation implies a certain
      psychological response from the team they are 'intimidating' and, if
      so, I used the wrong word.
    
      Lets just say I think there's a real good chance that Georgetown,
      like most teams UMass has faced, will be lucky to shoot much better
      than 38%.
    
      Defense is a constant.
    
      What will hurt UMass is if Georgetown is extremely physical and gets
      away with it and if UMass is in foul trouble.  (Well, of course, if
      they can't hit the broad side of a barn, that won't help either!)
    
    						Tony
77.2202SNAX::ERICKSONI'm tired of SNOW....Mon Mar 18 1996 20:0013
    
    	Just as you say Camby won't be a factor against Georgetown. I
    don't think Iverson and Page will be a factor against Umass.
    With Travieso and Padilla guarding Iverson and Page its a wash on
    both ends of the floor, Othello Harrington and Camby is also a
    wash. The game if it happens, will be Bright/Dingle vs Aw/Williams
    I'm not saying Travieso or Padilla is better then Iverson, I'm also
    not saying that Harrington is in the same class as Camby. They are
    adequete on both ends of the floor to make the matchups a virtual wash.
    	Iverson/Page took 34 shots combined against New Mexico. I don't
    see them getting 34 shots off against the defensive pressure of Umass.
    
    Ron
77.2203prediction or fact!ROCK::GRONOWSKISPORTS 1995 NOTY &amp; RED_SOX Most Knowledgeable Noter Award!Tue Mar 19 1996 00:362
77.2204This is a fact...PCBUOA::MORGANTue Mar 19 1996 10:363
    UMASS fans would never jump on UConn's bandwagon.
    
    					Steve
77.2205WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Mar 19 1996 11:004
    
    
    I won't! :-)
    
77.2206CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Tue Mar 19 1996 11:315
And I'd stand there with a shotgun making sure that they couldn't even
get a hand on the bandwagon as it went by.....

ZooMASS (and any University of Massachusetts alums know that little nickname
didn't come outta my haid) fans ain't welcome on the UCONN bandwagon.
77.2207CSLALL::BRULEAny one have a good dogsled team?Tue Mar 19 1996 11:421
    I thought it was U Zoo
77.2208MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Mar 19 1996 11:539
  >> ZooMASS (and any University of Massachusetts alums know that 
  >> little nickname didn't come outta my haid) fans ain't welcome 
  >> on the UCONN bandwagon.

     UConn's little bandwagon might lose a wheel against Mississippi 
     State. Travis Naught and that middle-aged geek Moron Scheffer ain't 
     athletic enough to hang and bang with MSU. 
    
77.2209CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Tue Mar 19 1996 12:061
That still don't mean we'd let any ZooMass folks on.  ;^)
77.2210USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Mar 19 1996 12:1730
>      Lets just say I think there's a real good chance that Georgetown,
>      like most teams UMass has faced, will be lucky to shoot much better
>      than 38%.

Tony, that would be a good shooting night for Georgetown !  :^)


>      Defense is a constant.
>      What will hurt UMass is if Georgetown is extremely physical and gets
>      away with it and if UMass is in foul trouble.

You'll be playing a school/coach who knew about defense long before
anyone knew Calipari's name.  Georgetown won't hurt UMass because they
play THUG-ball.  In Georgetown, UMass will be playing a team that plays
"in your face" defense as well as, if not better than, they do.



re:  guard matchups

Georgetown wins when Iverson and Page are playing well.  They don't lose.
They can win when they aren't dominant, but I don't know if they can beat
a quality team.  Georgetown can't win if they depend on Williams and Aw...
these guys don't score enough to make that kind of difference.

There's a greater chance that Iverson/Page will determine the outcome
than Camby.  Iverson/Page have adequate subs and people to help bring
the ball up.  Camby will be alone in the paint, unless Weeks helps.
And it won't be just Harrington he has to deal with.  They have plenty
of BIG bodies.
77.2211EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelTue Mar 19 1996 12:406
    I think Georgetown _would_ beat UMass, but that Texas Tech is going 
    to take them down before they get that chance...
    
    glenn
    
77.2212I'm Looking Too Far AheadSTRATA::BARBIERITue Mar 19 1996 12:4918
      re: -1
    
      That is a major thought I have.  Just the idea that we are
      overlooking Arkansas and Texas Tech.  Man, did Texas Tech
      do a number on North Carolina or what?  
    
      Well, should UMass get by the Razorbacks and end up facing
      Georgetown, I am fearful of how physical they are.  That
      game would look to being a war.
    
      Meanwhile, UMass/Arkansas tipoff is scheduled for 10:00 PM
      (bummer).  Saturday's regional final set to start at 6:00.
    
      I can't wait!
    
      By the way, should UMass lose, I'll probably root for UConn.
    
    						Tony
77.2213MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Mar 19 1996 13:018
    
       I'd not be too strong on Texas Tech just because they 
      beat the dogsnot out of UNC. I watched 'em in their season 
      finale against Texas and they looked pretty human against 
      a team that ain't as talented or tenacious as Georgetown. 
      So don't go wagering all that money you won betting on Bruno 
      this weekend.
    
77.2214And a valley so deepAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellTue Mar 19 1996 13:0318
    I was rooting hard for Georgetown last year and don't feel they let me
    down against North Carolina which then let me down against Arkansas who
    then let me down vs UCLA as did Conneticut who did not let me down vs
    EMich.
    
    Since you'll only have one day I guess it's okay to discuss UMass -
    Georgetown but there's two tough hills to climb.  The tournement is
    divided between the bangers and the shooters with UMass and Kansas
    being a little of both.
    
    Btw those "big bodies" is named White for Georgetown, definitely the x
    factor of the tournament - don't underestimate Weeks, he's never let
    UMass down yet.  My worry is Camby.  He's never looked the same since
    his collapse except when he gets mad he gets really going.  What a
    great block on Knight Saturday where the very audaciousness of the feat
    had them both laughing.
    
    Billte
77.2215EDWIN::WAUGAMANPride of SteelTue Mar 19 1996 13:0517
                                 
>      I'd not be too strong on Texas Tech just because they 
>      beat the dogsnot out of UNC. I watched 'em in their season 
>      finale against Texas and they looked pretty human against 
>      a team that ain't as talented or tenacious as Georgetown. 
>      So don't go wagering all that money you won betting on Bruno 
>      this weekend.
    
    Not to worry, I still have Georgetown in the Final 2 in my pool,
    as their talent would merit.  I just now think they're one of these 
    teams that's going to choke/be outcoached somewhere along the way,
    and Texas Tech looks like a prime candidate.  But if you want to
    give me the Bruno-like 10:1 odds, I'll gladly take a chance on the 
    upset knockout punch here, too...  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
77.2216USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Mar 19 1996 13:1816
Bet your mortgage on UMass over Arkansas.  Saying you can't overlook
your next opponent is merely being respectful, in this case.  The #1
team in the country and their fans shouldn't be concerned with a team
that barely got in the tournament with a bunch of freshmen.

I wouldn't bet the mortgage on Georgetown, but I'd bet something on
them.  Thompson is not a great tactician on the bench, and Iverson
has played his team to defeat before.  But Georgetown knows about
pressure.  I don't know if the same can be said for Texas Tech.

Every UMass fan should be rooting for Texas Tech.  Staring at Kentucky
in the SEMI-finals is bad enough.  Having to get to them through Georgetown
is awful.

If UMass beats Georgetown, Kentucky and Kansas to win the title, they'll
have done something HUGE !
77.2217ROCK::GRONOWSKISPORTS 1995 NOTY &amp; RED_SOX Most Knowledgeable Noter Award!Tue Mar 19 1996 13:477
77.2218MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Mar 19 1996 13:507
    >> Texas Tech looks like a prime candidate.  But if you want to
    >> give me the Bruno-like 10:1 odds, 
    
       Given Tyson's rust and Bruno's decent punching power Frank
       wasn't a bad proposition at 9:1. Texas Tech however won't
       know what to do with Iverson.    
    
77.2219better oddsHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedTue Mar 19 1996 13:585
Texas Tech is at 35:1 rigth now.

I haven't seen a Bruno line lately but it's prolly close to 0 I think.

TTom
77.2220CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Tue Mar 19 1996 14:0422
>    Actually, the bandwagon jumping will depend on who plays first.
>    If UMass plays Georgetown before UConn plays Cincinnati, all the
>    UMass people will jump to UConn... if UConn plays first, all those
>    people will jump on the UMass bandwagon after UCin slaps them silly.


Paul,

You just don't get it.  Most UCONN fans I know would rather have their teeth
scraped while having a barium enema than ever root for UMASS.  Most UMASS fans
I know are the same way.

I'd root for the New York Yankees before I'd ever even consider rooting for
ZooMass.

So, not only is your premise flawed, it's just plain stoooopid.


'Saw
    
    

77.2221The line is 7 1/2MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Mar 19 1996 14:066
    
  >> Texas Tech is at 35:1 rigth now.

     We're talking abouttheir odds of beating Georgetown which are
     considerably less than 35:1. 
    
77.2222Bandwagon Jumping is a cliche anyhowAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellTue Mar 19 1996 14:278
    Frank, Paul is talking about those peripheral folks who pick up a team
    like UMass because they like the way they play basketball.  Last year
    after UMass fell I went to the next worsts, Kentucky vs NC and Conn vs
    UCLA.  The domino theory, kinda.
    
    I guess there's no conference loyalty kind of thing in this for most
    people.  And btw, once the state of Ohio goes this weekend who does
    Groaner root for - whoever plays UMass and Conn. I'd guess.
77.2223SNAX::ERICKSONI'm tired of SNOW....Tue Mar 19 1996 14:437
    
    	Well, I have Georgetown beating Umass, with Kentucky, Kansas, and
    Uconn filling out the final 4. Uconn beating Kansas and Kentucky
    beating Georgetown, with Kentucky winning the whole thing.
    
    
    Ron
77.2224close but then at the end...HBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedTue Mar 19 1996 14:474
What Ron said except for UConn winning on a Pitino choke job.

TTom
77.2225Hope this helpsTNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Tue Mar 19 1996 15:5815
    For all the recent bandwagon-jumpers, here is how a true UMass fan
    feels about the rest of college basketball:
    
    LIKES - UMass' conference, the A-10 (we feel it's underrated)
    	  - UNLV (Calipari assistant Bill Bayno is head coach)
    	  - Kentucky (Pitino helped Calipari get the job)
    	  - Hawaii and Alaska (UMass wins tournaments out there)
    	 
    DISLIKES - The Big East (for many obvious reasons)
    	  - North Carolina (for historical reasons)
    	  - John Chaney (for personal reasons)
    	  - Mike Jarvis (ditto)
    	  - Jim Calhoun (for badmouthing Umass, and not playing us)
    
    NAZZ
77.2226known by your enemasHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedTue Mar 19 1996 16:025
I woulda thought that it would be:

	LIKE - Jim Calhoun (for not playing us) :=]

TTom
77.2227CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Tue Mar 19 1996 16:178
>    	  - Jim Calhoun (for badmouthing Umass, and not playing us)
    
It's Coach Calimari(tm) who's askeert to play UCONN.

I heard Coach Calhoun sayin' just the other night that a UCONN-UMASS matchup
would be a good thing.


77.2229ROCK::GRONOWSKISPORTS 1995 NOTY &amp; RED_SOX Most Knowledgeable Noter Award!Tue Mar 19 1996 17:413
77.2230USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Mar 19 1996 17:529
I bet UConn schedules to play UMass the day after Camby announces he's
going into the NBA draft.


re:  Pitino

Did anyone else see his postgame interview over the weekend when he
actually said that Kentucky will be the underdog against UTAH ???
This guy has no shame.
77.2231Good ReadingLUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Mar 20 1996 11:378
      re: .2228
    
      Brydie,
    
        I am perhaps more entertained by your contributions in this
        conf. than anyone else's.  Keep 'em coming!
    
    						Tony
77.2232Globe Article on Tyrone WeeksMROA::RSCHOTTWed Mar 20 1996 11:4916
         Can't say that I like the sounds of the continuing foot problems
    that Tyrone Weeks is enduring.  I had remarked to Nazz back in January 
    that Weeks seemingly lacked the quickness or explosiveness that he
    displayed at times last year.  Weeks confirmed this in today's Globe
    article by saying that he's playing in constant pain and at times he 
    can't even jump for a rebound, but rather just gets position, and hopes 
    the ball comes his way.
    
         Still he is making a solid contribution with 8 ppg and nearly
    6 rpg, over the last month of the season.  It is too bad that he is
    considering quitting the team after the season .... with the departure
    of senior's Bright and Dingle, I think everyone was expecting Weeks to
    put up some good numbers next season.
    
    Russ
        
77.2233Can further surgery help?TNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Wed Mar 20 1996 12:217
    Not surprising to read that article this morning.  It's been obvious
    for much of the season that Tyrone can't explode like he did last year. 
    Apparently, the off-season foot surgery was not a success.  It must be
    a serious problem for him to consider not returning for his senior
    season.
    
    NAZZ
77.2234USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Mar 20 1996 13:282
Wow, if Weeks gives up hoop and Camby goes NBA early, we're talkin'
totally new frontcourt for UMass (save Inus Norville).
77.2235USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Mar 20 1996 13:403
As if you UMass guys don't have enough to fret about, I thought I'd pass
along that the latest issue of Big East Briefs speculates that Calipari
could be a serious candidate for the St. John's job.
77.2236crowded fieldHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedWed Mar 20 1996 13:463
I heard Penders from Texas is in the running, too.

TTom
77.2237WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Mar 20 1996 13:454
    
    Please please please make it Penders!  There's no way I want 
    Calpitino coaching in the Big East!
    
77.2238Official KODIMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Mar 20 1996 14:024
Calipari spent part of St. Patrick's Day with Billy Bulger...

Calipari leaves, Whitey takes over as UMass coach...
77.2239MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Mar 20 1996 15:1816
    
    >> As if you UMass guys don't have enough to fret about, I thought 
    >> I'd pass along that the latest issue of Big East Briefs speculates 
    >> that Calipari could be a serious candidate for the St. John's job.
    
       Who puts out that Big East Briefs? The same people who
       publish The Weekly World News? Are JFK and Elvis serious
       candidates too? If Coach Cal wanted the St John's job it'd
       be his. St John's isn't such a plumb job that folks are
       just lining up and the the school can afford to pass
       over the likes of Calipari. And why would he want that job 
       anyways? New York's a better place to raise your kids? Hell, 
       no. It's easier to recruit kids to a commuter school? Hell, no.
       He thinks he can resurrect Felipe Lopez? Coach Cal could have 
       virtually any open coaching job in the country why he'd pick
       St. John's makes no sense.
77.2240USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Mar 20 1996 16:376
>       Coach Cal could have 
>       virtually any open coaching job in the country why he'd pick
>       St. John's makes no sense.

Based on your comments Tommy, why would anyone want the St. John's
job ?  Other than it's rich basketball history, of course...
77.2241MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Mar 20 1996 16:4911
  >> Based on your comments Tommy, why would anyone want the St. John's
  >> job ?  Other than it's rich basketball history, of course...

     No, Joe, based on my comments the type of person that would
     want the job would be someone for whom it would clearly
     be a step forward ie; someone who is an assistant somewhere,
     a coach at a smaller school, etc. It certainly doesn't seem
     like tempting job for the coach of the number one team in
     the country who has no discernible ties to the school.
    
77.2242Calipari going to St. John's is beyond ridiculousTNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Wed Mar 20 1996 16:5511
    Coach Cal will only leave UMass for one of three other college jobs:
    Kansas (wife has roots there), Kentucky (as a favor to Pitino), or
    North Carolina (to show southerners he can coach).  
    
    St John's would not be a step backwards for Calipari; it would be
    several steps backward.  I doubt St. John's will be able to get Pendes
    to leave Texas - his gig is too plush there.  I think Fran Frischella
    from Manhattan is the logical choice, but if they want a big name, Don
    Nelson is available!
    
    NAZZ
77.2243confusionHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedWed Mar 20 1996 17:0718
>    North Carolina (to show southerners he can coach).  

Chapel Hill won't stand for this!~ Having a coach there who could
actually coach would only confuse them

In a way, I feel sorry for the poor sap that does follow Dean. I mean
he'll prolly get real confused about those Excellent Losses, etc.

As for these steps, it's all very confusing. People jump ship and
conferences all the time. Who's to say if'n they're stepping up or
stepping down.

Gary Williams went from BC to Ohio St to Maryland. Which directions were
those? Barnes from Providence to Clemson?

Boeheim stays at Syracuse. What the hail does that mean.

TTom
77.2244MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveWed Mar 20 1996 17:078
   >> Coach Cal will only leave UMass for one of three other college jobs:

      The one that's a) more prestigious (ie UCLA, Duke, etc.) or b) the 
      one that pays much more money (self-explanatory) or the one that 
      gives him control over the athletic department combined with either
      a) or b).
    
77.2245USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Mar 20 1996 17:144
I thought Calipari was from the greater NYC area ????

And Calipari following Pitino is the way it must be.  One huckster
taking over for another.
77.2246USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Mar 20 1996 17:144
>Boeheim stays at Syracuse. What the hail does that mean.

I love that, TTom.  It's what I was asking when he wasn't fired during/after
the NCAA investigation.
77.2247To any of 'em: come on downHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedWed Mar 20 1996 17:207
Hail, I'd be happy if'n any of the above would come to Raleigh and
relieve us of Les.

I like Les a lot and think he'd make a good A.D. But his coaching suffers
from the inability to recruit, develop or actually coach.

TTom
77.2248IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Mar 20 1996 17:465
>Hail, I'd be happy if'n any of the above would come to Raleigh and
>relieve us of Les.

Be careful what you wish for - it might come true...

77.2249couldaHBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedWed Mar 20 1996 17:5110
Wail, for those that don't or caint remember, when State hires Les there
was one other guy in the running, that guy currently at the helm at
UMass.

I guess things mighta been a little different. Barnes would be good. So
would williams. 

Boeheim could come down and study from the master just down the road...

TTom
77.2250Bummer About WeeksLUDWIG::BARBIERIWed Mar 20 1996 18:148
      This Weeks thing sure is a bummer.  What with UMass not being
      especially deep this year and their 6th man being this hurt.
      After wWeeks, what kind of minutes do Norville and Clarke log?
    
      Boy, if Camby leaves and Weeks hangs it up, next years team
      will sure go down quite a few notches.
    
    						Tony
77.2251But it's too soon to worry about next year!TNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Wed Mar 20 1996 18:338
    Calipari is from as suburb of Pittsburg.
    
    Next year will be a transition year for sure.  But then again, I had
    UMass going 20-9 this year, so maybe Kettner, Mack, Babul, et al will
    surprise us.  Having Travieso and Padilla in the backcourt is a nice
    place to start next year's team.
    
    NAZZ
77.2252WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Mar 20 1996 18:365
    
    > -< But it's too soon to worry about next year! >-
    
    Yeah, why do today what you can only put off until TOMORROW!  :^)
    
77.2253USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Mar 20 1996 18:594
>      This Weeks thing sure is a bummer.

Don't fret Tony.  I take athlete injury reports about as seriously as
weather reports.  8^)
77.2254PJ?????LANDO::FARLEYThu Mar 21 1996 12:4121
    
    Yabbut hi there, remember me?  I used ta be "a regular guy" here but
    now am expected to do real work <insert bummer>.
    
    I know this belongs in the BE note but what the heck...... I heard
    another name being bantered around for the SJU job - PJ Carlissimo,
    presently coaching in da NBA (Seattle?)
    
    IMO,  finding a *good* coach for the former Redmen is gonna be super
    hard.  Remember that SJU is a commuter school, no dorm.  The campus
    has zero quaintness and being in a "burb" of NYC doen't have the same
    appeal to recruits as say uh, Hofstra  ;^) or UConn.
    
    Speaking of Hofstra, they're ranked in da top 20 for lacrosse.
    
    I remain,
    uncertain about my nexted time in here,
    kev
    
    
    
77.2255BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredThu Mar 21 1996 12:547

	Did anyone see the footage of that guy from UMASS falling off the 
	podium?  Who was it anyway?  It looked like Chevy Chase making fun of
	Gerry Ford.

	Kevin
77.2256IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Mar 21 1996 13:032
It was Carmelo Travieso.  According to the Glove(tm), it was a little
ironic since Travieso is also the team's leading practical joker.
77.2257CAM::WAYThere's the devil to pay!Thu Mar 21 1996 13:047
Kev,

Lots of talk about PJ on WFAN.  Most don't think he'd be interested, most don't
think it will happen.         


'Saw
77.2258Vegas Seems To Prefer GeorgetownLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Mar 21 1996 20:4511
      By the way, I think Vegas prefers Georgetown to UMass.  Both
      are rated 7-5 odds to make the final four, HOWEVER, UMass is
      a bigger favorite to make it to the regional final than is
      Georgetown.  Thus for UMass to not have an edge on the basis
      of this would seem to imply a final matchup between them would
      not be rated even.
    
      Should both win, I think Georgetown will be 1.5 to 2 point
      favorites.
    
    						Tony
77.2259AD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherFri Mar 22 1996 08:437
    
    
      Didn't stay up to watch it but heard on the radio UMASS cruised. 
    Also heard Camby missed the team bus to the Georgia Dome and was
    fined or suspened or something.  Any word on that.
    
    Jerry
77.2260SHARE::DERRYColor me impressed...Fri Mar 22 1996 10:041
77.2261PCBUOA::MORGANFri Mar 22 1996 10:5917
    Camby sat out until it was about 13-0, or roughly 3 minutes into the
    game.  He then proceeded to accumulate 3 fouls in about 10 minutes
    time.  I know it's hard to criticize a guy who's one of the best at
    blocking shots, but he's got to tone it down a bit.  It looks like he's
    trying to swat every shot down the guy's throat, so even when he
    doesn't foul the guy, it appears that he is with this exaggerated
    motion.
    
    Weeks played great.  I'm not sure Pat Bradley has ever had to play
    against the kind of defense that Travieso threw at him last night. He
    was no factor.  Bright and Dingle will have to do a much better job on
    Saturday for UMASS to win.
    
    The question now is, who'll be guarding Iverson?  I would think it
    would be Travieso.
    
    					Steve
77.2262Just Don't Breath On IversonLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Mar 22 1996 11:3125
  My main concern now for the Georgetown game is officiating.  I have
  one main thought after watching Gaeorgetown/Texas Tech.  If you so
  much as breath on Iverson, expect a foul.  I thought it was totally
  outrageous.  And if the UMass/Georgetown game is called the same,
  I don't know how UMass will survive.  Either the guards get into
  quick foul trouble or Iverson must be allowed to move with no resis-
  tance whatsoever.  Absolutely pathetic foul calling.

  And I'm not saying the officiating was all pro-Georgetown.  Harrington's
  fifth foul was pathetic.  LET THEM PLAY!  For crying out loud, the 
  Tech player was going backward as Harrington went up for the board!

  I caught Duncan's 4th foul.  Here's Wake tied with Louisville and the
  Cardinals attempt a short shot.  Duncan blocks it and Wake gets the
  rebound.  But, no!  They call Duncan for his fourth foul and Louisville
  gets two free throws.  That very well could have doomed Wake.

  Anyway, I am very concerned about Georgetown.  I think they ought to
  be favored.  Too many big bodies to throw at you + Iverson.  But, after
  seeing Georgetown/Texas Tech (a wonderfully entertaining game), my main
  concern is officiating.  So much as touch Iverson and expect to be hit
  with a foul.  If the officials consider this to be 'basketball', I don't
  see how UMass can stay with them.  You'd have to rotate four guards.

  						Tony
77.2263IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Mar 22 1996 11:4718
>  My main concern now for the Georgetown game is officiating.  I have
>  one main thought after watching Gaeorgetown/Texas Tech.  If you so
>  much as breath on Iverson, expect a foul.  I thought it was totally
>  outrageous.

I watched the whole game and didn't see it that way at all.   And no one
hates Georgetown more than me.

The intentional foul had the guy shoving Iverson in the *back* as he drove
to the hoop.  Another foul had the Tech point guard throwing out a knee into
Iverson's thigh.  Tech wasn't playing dirty, but they *were* getting called
for what should have been called.

Small aside - intentionals don't get called nearly enough - I thought the 
one last night was a good call.

I thought I caught the Wake/'ville score on CNN this morning - was it 
Wake 60, Louisville 58?
77.2264Whining already before the game!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Mar 22 1996 12:154
    
    
       I knew this was coming.
    
77.2265IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Mar 22 1996 12:165
Chap, where are your loyalties on this one?  I thought you were a UMass fan
as well...

Last night was the first time in my life I ever rooted for the Hoyas.  I feel
kind of dirty...
77.2266SNAX::ERICKSONI'm tired of SNOW....Fri Mar 22 1996 12:187
    
    	I don't think it will be a problem for Travieso and Padilla,
    they move there feet on defence. As far as Camby and his blocked
    shot attempts, hey Marcus, stop trying to block the shot from
    behind. They will call you for the foul 99% of the time.
    
    Ron
77.2267Even though I hate the UMASS BW jumpersWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Mar 22 1996 12:207
    
    
    
      I am a Georgetown Hoya fan. Big East is my second choice. If I had
    to pick a third it would be UMASS.
    
    
77.2268WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Mar 22 1996 12:4616
    
    I was gonna mention about the pre-whining myself!
    
    Mike, I'm no Georgetown lover, but it goes like this for me:
    
      1) Syracuse (BE)
      2) URI (A10)
      3) PC (BE)
      4) Rest of Big East, incl. G'town
      5) most everyone else in A10 except UMass
      .....
      3rd to last) Umass
      2nd to last) Kentucky
      last) anyone in the ACC
    
    - Sean
77.2269I can't stand a hypocritesCNTROL::SALMONFri Mar 22 1996 13:009
    Re: 77.2267
    
               I'd bet my life that you weren't a Hoya fan until the early
    - mid 80's. When did you jump on that bandwagon, when Ewing commited?
    
    
    
    
                                    JJS
77.2270MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Mar 22 1996 13:1417
    
   >> Camby sat out until it was about 13-0, or roughly 3 minutes into the
   >> game.  He then proceeded to accumulate 3 fouls in about 10 minutes
   >> time.  I know it's hard to criticize a guy who's one of the best at
   >> blocking shots, but he's got to tone it down a bit.  It looks like he's
   >> trying to swat every shot down the guy's throat, so even when he
   >> doesn't foul the guy, it appears that he is with this exaggerated
   >> motion.
    
      It's not like Camby does this every game he plays. Last night after
      starting out on the bench Marcus came in *way* too pumped. he was
      throwing up wild shots, scrambling wildly after rebounds and flail-
      ing at the ball trying to make blocks. He's a much better player 
      when he gets into a rhythm and let's the game flow instead of trying
      to force it. UMass doesn't need Camby to carry them. They need him
      to play a Marcus Camby game and everything else will take care of
      itself.
77.2271It Looked That Way To MeLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Mar 22 1996 13:2814
      I didn't mean to be whining and I *did* say I thought the 5th
      on Harrington was a bogus call.  The way I saw it, anytime
      there was any contact on Iverson...foul!  Thats' the way it
      looked to me.
    
      I agree with the Camby assessment.  Man, he's got to play
      better mentally.  3 fouls in something like 8 minutes playing
      time and the 3rd foul was so stupid.  You got something like
      11 minutes left in the half and I have to wonder how in the
      world anyone could even consider making a decision like that!!
    
      Boy, this next game is going to be something.
    
    						Tony
77.2272What's the matter with these guys?GLRMAI::WILKESFri Mar 22 1996 14:5422
    I agree Camby played a very dopey game in the first half last night. It
    is absolutely essential that he use his five fouls wisely against
    G'town.
    
    In a similar vein I can't believe how dumb Inus Norville and to a
    lesser extent Tyrone Weeks were last night about fouls in the first
    half. Norville picked up two quick ones in about a minute of play in
    the first half. Then midway thru the half with Camby already in foul
    trouble he comes in and quickly picks up his third foul and leaves
    again and then incredibly he gets put in late in the first half and
    quickly picks up a fourth foul on a reach-in foul at the UMass
    offensive end. Then after Tyrone Weeks picks up his third foul on an
    ill-advised charging foul Norville comes damm close to committing his
    fifth foul in the first half on an attempted steal near the foul line.
    How dumb can you get.
    
    If Camby, Norville, and Weeks don't save their fouls for face up in the
    paint defensive fouls against Georgetown UMass will be toast against
    Georgewtown.
    
    Also Travieso will have to avoid the sloppy ball-handling mistakes he
    made last night against the press.
77.2273the show is over for those pretendersROCK::GRONOWSKISPORTS 1995 NOTY &amp; RED_SOX Most Knowledgeable Noter Award!Fri Mar 22 1996 15:093
77.2274Should be a classicTNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Fri Mar 22 1996 15:1113
    I am really looking for ward to tomorrow night.  After sluffing off
    those pretenders from Arkansas, it will be refreshing to see a real
    challenge for UMass.  The Travieso-Iverson duel should be great.  I
    noticed that for much of the second half Georgetown did not have
    Iverson take the ball upcourt.  This was obviously an attempt to rest
    him, but that won't work against UMass, as Aw or Page will be guarded
    by Padilla, and that could be a defensive liability for Georgetown.
    
    I agree with previous comments about Camby being too pumped up, and
    the entire UMass front line picking up stupid fouls.  They can't afford
    that tomorrow night.  I'm looking forwrd to a 4-6 point UMass win.
    
    NAZZ
77.2275Misc.LUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Mar 22 1996 15:3644
      I think the definition of 'foul-prone' has Norville's picture
      on it.  Kiss any thought of him not picking up quick fouls
      good-bye.
    
      Anybody remember the foul where Iverson reached his arm around
      the defender and pulled him toward him?  (Foul Texas Tech.)  I
      know...the refs clearly didn't see that one and that was just
      dumb luck.  Still...incredible!
    
      After talking to some people at work, I'm feeling better about
      UMass' defensive chances against Iverson.  Comments about Padilla's
      and Travieso's experience and quick feet assured me that they
      will be able to provide some fairly solid defense and stay out
      of foul trouble.
    
      Other than that, I just hope Camby intimidates defensively from
      under the basket mainly and just mentally confines himself a little.
      I expect Bright to play real well.  He seems sometimes to have an 
      off game where he's not quite with it mentally, but then to bounce
      back and have a real nice game.
    
      What about Georgetown's press?  I wonder if when Padilla is out and
      Clarke is trying to beat it that they ought to leave Camby at the
      defensive end?  I remember when Oklahoma with Blaylock/King/Grant
      destroyed Arizona (Elliot) and I thought Kansas would be toast.  I
      don't think I ever saw a team with the combination pressure defense/
      explosive offense that Oklahoma had.  But, Kansas had Manning on the
      defensive end whenever there was the full court press and that really
      helped a lot.
    
      By the way, in the Georgetown game, I really thought Tech had a 
      solid chance when they were down by 3 and Harrington fouled out.
      Man, but they seemed to make poor decisions.  Almost never went
      to Sasser on offense.  Hoisted a couple threes.  Their offense 
      seemed to play a lot less smart.
    
      One last thing...how does Harrington usually fare offensively?  He
      was so on fire last night and I'm wondering how much better than
      his average game that was.  Man, he was like 8/9 or something.
      Maybe even better.  Just didn't miss.  Even outside jumpers and
      hooks.
    
      						Tony
          
77.227640 minutes of hell?LUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Mar 22 1996 15:393
      Camby had a funny comment on Arkansas 40 minutes of hell.
      He said something like "40 minutes of hell?  The game was
      over after 2 minutes!"
77.2277MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Mar 22 1996 15:4324
    
    
         It's amazing how many people don't think UMass will beat
        Georgetown. I'd not be surprised if tomorrow's line has
        G-town favored. Granted UMass hasn't been blowing people 
        off the floor but this team has but *ONE* loss. Maybe it's
        because they're not "showtime". All they do is go out and 
        win every time save once. Maybe it's because they play in
        the A-10. At this point UMass shouldn't have anything to 
        prove but apparently they do. Maybe it'll take Iverson and 
        company to enable UMass to inform the rest of the country that 
        Kentucky as national champs isn't a forgone conclusion. Maybe 
        once the rest of the country watches UMass force Iverson to 
        try and beat them and Padilla and Traveiso not allowing him 
        to, maybe then folks will perk up and go, "You know Umass-
        Kentucky II is going to be a good game." Georgetown has a 
        very nice squad. One that is certainly capable of beating 
        UMass. But when Umass plays their game and everyone is on the 
        same page they haven't lost this year and even when they're
        not they've only lost once. How about a little respect?
        Didn't anyone learn from Arkansas last year? Or UNC? Or
        Kentucky? UMass is for real and Georgetown might have been
        better served if everyone were syaing that instead of dissin' 
        the Minutemen.
77.2278WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Mar 22 1996 16:4113
    
    Respect can be unfairly hard to come by sometimes.  But after all,
    here's how Umass is doing in the tourney - they beat a 16, a 9 (barely), 
    and a 12 seed.  Hmmmm, I could almost start to sound like I (and you) 
    did about Pittsburgh and they way they made the SB.  :^)
    
    Maybe you're right, maybe after beating G'town, the world will see
    things differently, but you can't blame us outsiders for veiwing
    some of this with a little wariness.  Thank the lord this isn't
    college football, and it all gets worked out the way it should get
    worked out - on the court.
    
    - Sean
77.2279I Think Just A Tad Unfair!LUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Mar 22 1996 16:5322
      re: -1
    
      I don't understand how anyone can say UMass doesn't deserve
      *some* respect on the basis of what Brydie said.  For crying
      out loud, they played Kentucky, Wake Forest, Memphis, Louisville,
      etc. and lost ONE game.  You have got to be good to do that!
    
      Winning the tournament is not the only indicator and some times
      the champions who are remembered also had some luck (i.e. Tyus
      Edny verses Missouri).
    
      UMass just beat a squad that handily beat Marquette - a team that
      recently beat Louisville and Cincinnati (hope I spelled that right!).
      They also barely lost to Cin at Cin and I think beat Memphis.
      Arkansas hasn't been half bad and UMass simply dismantled them.
    
      Still...I have this concern.  UMass has yet to beat a higher seed
      in the tournament.  Except their 1st year, they lost to a lower
      seed.  Virginia, Maryland, Ok State - all seeded lower.  It would
      really be nice for them to break this streak.
    
    						Tony
77.2280I can't waitCOPS01::MARTINFri Mar 22 1996 17:0719
    Will Travieso play Iverson on Saturday???  I assumed it would be
    Padilla playing him.  Either way, though it's going to be a great 
    matchup!!  I'm down here in the middle of Hoya territory and I'm
    takin' a lot of abuse from these Hoya fans and everyone is picking
    G'Town to take this game.  These folks are already talkin' about how
    G'Town matches up against Kentucky and looking past Saturday's game.
    
    Finally we get to play one of the "big boys" from the BE, I can't
    wait!!
    
    
    PS.  Last night's game by Harrington was not his typical game for G'Town
         that's how they expected him to play but he hasn't lived up to
         those expectations.
    
    GO UMASS!!!
    
    
    Thomas
77.2281just the facts, m'amMROA::RSCHOTTFri Mar 22 1996 17:2237
         Here's how UMass and Georgetown have done against common
    opponents:
    
    Boston College:
    	G'T  66  BC  63
        G'T  67  BC  64
        UM   65  BC  57
    
    Duquesne
    
        G'T  88  Duq  86
        UM   93  Duq  89
    
    Pittsburg
    
        Pitt  75  G'T  56
        UM    79  Pitt 71 (OT, w/o Camby)
    
    Syracuse
    
        G'T  83  Syracuse  64
        Syracuse  85  G'T  64
        UM  65  Syracuse 47
    
    Memphis
    
        G'T  81  Memphis  60
        UM   64  Memphis  61
    
    Georgia Tech
    
        G'T  94  Geo.Tech  72
        UM   75  Geo.Tech  67
    
         Pretty even, overall I'd say.
    
    Russ
77.2282WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Fri Mar 22 1996 18:4210
    
    
    Georgetown fan since early eighties. Yes I met Ewing while he played
    for C R+L and I fell in love with his game. Now if you call someone who
    has lived and died Hoya gray for 15 years??? Plus when I was in the
    Navy stationed in Norfolk VA. I partied at G'Town numerous times!!! :-)
    
    
    
    Chap
77.2283USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Mar 22 1996 19:099
I thought Padilla was the better and quicker defender ?  If so, he HAS TO
guard Iverson.  Most coaches say Iverson is the quickest player they've
EVER seen.

Tony, Iverson is so quick that you aren't even seeing the fouls the
defenders are committing !  (seriously)

Gtown has had multiple people bring the ball up against the press.
I'd love to see Padilla covering Aw (right to the low-post area).
77.2284ROCK::GRONOWSKISPORTS 1995 NOTY &amp; RED_SOX Most Knowledgeable Noter Award!Fri Mar 22 1996 19:342
77.2285PCBUOA::MORGANFri Mar 22 1996 19:395
    Both Padilla and Travieso excel on defense, but Travieso usually draws
    the toughest assignment.  I tell my kid to watch Travieso play defense
    because he usually puts on a clinic fundamentally.
    
    					Steve
77.2286It ain't no dig neitherAD::HEATHThe albatross and whales they are my brotherMon Mar 25 1996 09:068
    
    
    
     Question.....I don't watch much college hoop or hoop for that matter
    but I did watch the UMASS G'Town game.  Is UMASS really that good or
    is G'Town just overated?
    
    Jerry
77.2287Revenge factor and all that...PCBUOA::MORGANMon Mar 25 1996 10:557
    You don't get to the final 8 being overrated.  UMASS is good. 
    Georgetown may have gone to the Final 4 had they been in a different
    bracket.  
    
    It's going to be awful tought next week beating Kentucky a second time.
    
    						Steve
77.2288They've Exceeded My Expectations!LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Mar 25 1996 11:5347
  Wow, what destruction!

  If I could summarize the game, it is that UMass' half court defense
  was so good that Georgetown had only one chance.  Succeed with the
  press and make some transition baskets.  This, Padilla and the rest
  of the squad, almost completely disallowed Georgetown from doing.

  The one time Georgetown had a run, late in the first half, that is
  exactly how they did it.  They forced a couple turnovers and got some
  easy ones.  They also had three three point possessions.  But, basically,
  if I were to view the game from Georgetown's perspective, after about
  half of the second half, it would have seemed hopeless.  We need a run
  and UMass' half court defense is playing too well.  Therefore, we need
  to create turnovers, but we aren't!!!

  I didn't see the Kentucky game, but given that it was the first game
  anyway, I think this was UMass' finest game all year.  And it wasn't
  gained by being in a shooting zone like when Travieso was something like
  7/8 3 pointers against Temple, it was just solid, fundamentally sound
  basketball.  Bright's block of the three pointer is an excellent example.

  ANYWAY, DO THEY DESERVE SOME RESPECT OR WHAT?!!!  (They really do regardless
  of what else happens.)

  So, what do they have to do against Kentucky?  The exact same thing.  They
  must play with the same passion on half court defense.  They must not
  allow the Kentucky press to force a lot of turnovers.  If they do this and
  stay out of foul trouble and not get tired, they SHOULD WIN.  Why?  Because
  Kentucky lacks an answer for Camby.  In a half-court game, the Camby 
  factor looms.  They really don't have the post game, offensively or 
  defensively for Camby.  If UMass, at half court defense, denies the easy
  threes and just plays it as they did against Georgetown and if they do
  not get rattled by the full court press, I truly like their chances.

  If the Kentucky press gets to them, they don't have a chance.

  Either way, so long as its not a huge loss, win or lose, I am content with
  their season.  They finally did it.  They did all that was expected of them
  AND MORE!!!

  Sure, in the short-term, I'll be disappointed should they lose to Kentucky.
  But, in the long-term, I will be content.

  Meanwhile, will anyone stop the Bulldogs???  Wins over Kentucky, UConn, and
  Cin in two weeks.  This team is sizzling!

							Tony
77.2289IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Mar 25 1996 11:5610
>  ANYWAY, DO THEY DESERVE SOME RESPECT OR WHAT?!!!

<sigh>

They've been getting it all year.  What do you want, a day declared where all
250 million citizens of this country prostrate themselves facing Amherst?

8:00 pm Saturday night will be the game of the year.  (This coming from an SU
fan who was somewhat partial to the Syracuse/Georgia game...)

77.2290Couple More CommentsLUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Mar 25 1996 12:0527
      I did stay tuned for a couple comments after the game.
    
      Raveling said that UMass is now the team to beat and noted
      that they are the most poised team in the field.
    
      Padilla, man, he kind of opened his mouth!  He was asked
      right after the game what he thought of Kentucky and he said,
      "We beat them before and it'll be a pleasure beating them again!"
      (This was when the whole team was gathered about Calipari right
      after the game and they were being interviewed by CBS Sports.)
      I wonder what Calipari thought when Padilla said that!  The
      whole team laughed when Padilla said that.
    
      Just a couple more things.  UMass, as a unit, has the best defensive
      hands I have perhaps EVER SEEN.  I hope bigtime that they are allowed
      to use them.  Its subjective, but sometimes the calls are tighter
      than at other times and what a pair of hands does in one game is
      considered a foul in another.  I sure hope they can use their hands.
    
      The other thing is, this team sure is poised.  You can see it in
      the guards and Bright especially.  I think.  But, its really there
      with the whole team.  Should the UMass/Kentucky game be close, this
      is a factor that should prefer UMass.  Kentucky has not known a 
      single close game all year.  UMass has known several...and has won
      virtually every close game.
    
    							Tony
77.2291SupportLUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Mar 25 1996 12:1426
      re: .2289
    
      I don't think they were getting respect commensurate with their
      accomplishments at all.  I'll give a couple examples.
    
      A friend of mine is in the UMass internet.  He said a lot of
      Georgetown and Kentucky fans have been in there and claimed that
      UMass is over-rated.
    
      In sports talk radio, a lot of people stated that Arkansas would
      give them problems and might even win.  Most everybody picked
      Georgetown to win the east regional.  Now, Kentucky is a 9.5 point
      favorite - to a team with one loss who just beat Georgetown by
      24, and who beat Kentucky by 10!!!
    
      Sport, or Inside Sport (forget which), predicted UMass to exit from
      the tournament early.  
    
      Do some research and see the percentage of prognosticators that
      picked UMass to not even make it out of the east.
    
      Respect *commensurate* with their accomplishments says something
      quite unlike what has been said, imo.
    
    						Tony
    
77.2292IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Mar 25 1996 12:2122
>      A friend of mine is in the UMass internet.  He said a lot of
>      Georgetown and Kentucky fans have been in there and claimed that
>      UMass is over-rated.

>      In sports talk radio, a lot of people stated that Arkansas would
>      give them problems and might even win.  Most everybody picked
>      Georgetown to win the east regional. 

OK, so a bunch of morons who need speed-dial to call 9-1-1 gave an opinion.
Wow.

>Now, Kentucky is a 9.5 point
>      favorite - to a team with one loss who just beat Georgetown by
>      24, and who beat Kentucky by 10!!!

Ask TTom about this one.  The idea of the line is to spur *betting action*,
not to serve as an indicator of what the oddsmakers think of the team.

>      Do some research and see the percentage of prognosticators that
>      picked UMass to not even make it out of the east.

Why bother?  *It doesn't matter*  Relax and enjoy your team's success.  I am.
77.2293exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Mar 25 1996 12:248
     >> Ask TTom about this one.  The idea of the line is to spur *betting 
     >> action*, not to serve as an indicator of what the oddsmakers think 
     >> of the team.
    
        No it's not. The idea of the line is to get an even amount of
        action on each team. Bookies don't make money by picking winners
        they make it off the vigorish. In other words, the general public
        would not bet UMass without considerable incentive. No respect.
77.2294IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Mar 25 1996 12:332
Tommy, I don't see how what I said is different from what you said.
(Although I now see how you can get "no respect" when interpreting it.)
77.2295WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Mar 25 1996 12:596
    
    I disagree Tommy.  You're right about the idea being to get half the 
    bets on each team, but a lot of times, odds are skewed because of other
    factors.  Certain regions of the country just don't gamble as much as
    others and those regions' home teams routinely get funny lines.
    
77.2296Not a good weekendWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Mar 25 1996 13:034
    
    
    
       I like my crow covered with Maple Syrup!!! :-(
77.2297As enjoyable as the 1970-71 Julius Erving teamTNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Mon Mar 25 1996 13:1733
    Someone a few notes back said it best - relax and enjoy the season
    UMass has put together.  I certainly am!
    
    What even makes it sweeter for me is that I expected this team to be a
    step behind the accomplishments from the UMass Elite 8 team of last
    year.  Losing Mike Williams, Lou Roe, and Derek Kellogg meant that a
    significant chunk of that team would not be back this season.  Add to
    that the top freshman recruit, 6-10 Lari Kettner, was a Prop. 48 victim
    and ineligible for this season.  I predicted 12-4 in the A-10 and 20-9
    overall, and I thought I was being optimistic.
    
    What UMass has shown this season is that you cannot underestimate the
    value of the word TEAM.  This was never more obvious than Saturday
    night against Georgetown.  Yes, Iverson is an exciting player, but he
    seemed to have little concept of what a team game was.  Every single
    UMass player was in consort with the other four players on the floor at
    all times.  Their offense as usual was average, but the instinctive way
    they seemed to know where everyone else was and where they should be
    was cliniical.  I coach a 15-Under AAU team, and I tell them to watch
    how UMass plays as a team.  That was never more evident than Saturday.
    
    I predicted a 6-8 point UMass win on Friday mornig, but by Saturady
    afternoon, I was thinking 16-18 point range.  They exceeded even my
    wildesdt expectations.  Iverson's inability or unwillingness to get the
    rest of the Hoyas invloved played right into UMass' hands.  He only had
    one assist, and I am unable to remember it.  The Georgetown big men
    were never a factor.  It was a wonderful basketball clinic.
    
    As for the Final Four, I'm thinking Saturday will be very close.  But
    no matter which way the UMass-Kentucky game goes, this has been one
    tremendously gratifying season.
    
    NAZZ
77.2298Great Game....Great SeasonCOPS01::MARTINMon Mar 25 1996 14:0319
    Again, it's been the play of the guards that have made this a great
    team.  After losing Kellogg from last years team I don't think anyone
    expected Edgar to step up and play as big as he has played this year.
    Pre-season no one knew what to expect from this duo and they were
    ranked as low as 16.  That victory over Syracuse in that tournament
    back in December however was most impressive and I realized what a 
    great defensive team this is.  I think this has been the difference
    between this year and last year.....Williams and Kellogg could not
    play the "D" like Edgar and Carmello.  Also the way these guys are able
    to handle full court presses thrown at them is incredible.  Sure
    they'll turn it over at times but more often they are able to get the 
    ball up court for easy hoops.  G'town had 16 turnovers compared to
    UMASS's 12 and we scored more points off of our TOs that G'Town did.
    
    I'm with you guys lets enjoy the remaining games and if we come up a
    little short, at least we'll know that these guys went out and gave it
    their all and that's all we can ask for as fans.  
    
    Thomas  
77.2299Just two more games!!!!!!MROA::RSCHOTTMon Mar 25 1996 14:0420
         Interesting factoid about UMass-Kentucky.  After the first meeting
    in November, UMass Radio Color Man and former Coach Jack Leaman was
    talking to his former player Rick Pitino, and basically said that he
    (Pitino) had to move Tony Delk from the point and back to 2G.  Shortly
    thereafter Delk was back at 2G, and sub Isiah Epps has gone on to have
    a pretty good year for the 'Cats, and Delk has been Kentucky's leading
    scorer.
    
         Though I'm worried about UMass' having to beat Kentucky a second
    time to advance, I do like their chances.  The first time around Camby
    had a monster game, and UMass shot 31-37 at the free throw line.  I
    don't expect either thing to happen a second time.  But I like the
    matchups, Camby on McCarty, Dingle on Walker, Travieso on Delk;  I
    expect the UMass backcourt to be even more solid than they were the
    first time (and Carmelo to toss up and hopefully hit a few more treys);
    and finally I like UMass' chances if its a close game.  Also Weeks, who
    wasn't a factor the first game, has played great the last month!  Camby
    has to stay out of foul trouble, and be able to play 30+ minutes!
    
    Russ
77.2300Refuse to Lose SNARFOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Mar 25 1996 14:161
77.2301MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Mar 25 1996 14:1833
  >> Again, it's been the play of the guards that have made this a great
  >> team.  After losing Kellogg from last years team I don't think anyone
  >> expected Edgar to step up and play as big as he has played this year.
    
     What is it about Derek Kellogg that had so many people thinking
     the Minutemen would suffer greatly without him? He rarely shot
     the ball. He couldn't drive Miss Daisy much less the lane. He
     was an adequate defender but didn't have the quickness to cover
     the opposition's best scorer. In short, he could easily be re-
     placed by any very good high school player. Padilla had ten times
     the upside potential from Day One than Kellogg did and he's shown
     it.


                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 77.219               Official UMASS Athletics Note              219 of 2071
MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!"            10 lines  29-NOV-1993 10:24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     Edgar Padilla was certainly a pleasant surprise. I expected
    Camby to be good after all the press he's gotten but Padilla
    looks like he could eventually beat Derrick Kellogg out of a 
    job. The kid has great instincts, a nice shooting touch and 
    quickness. And unlike Kellogg, he'll take the open jay. And 
    stick it, too. Although, Kellogg looks like he's a little more 
    relaxed about taking the shot hitting a few treys over the week-
    end. Last year Kellogg wouldn't hoist it up at gun point. Still,
    by next year I'd like to see Padilla as the starting PG.

    
77.2302Padilla vs. KelloggMROA::RSCHOTTMon Mar 25 1996 14:2919
         My problem with Padilla prior to this year, and my comfort with
    Derek Kellogg was that Edgar was just too wild to be a point guard in
    the UMass system.  I was watching a tape of the UMass-North Carolina
    game from two years ago, a while back.  It was Padilla's freshman
    season, and he relieved Kellogg at one point.  He quickly beat the UNC
    defender on a drive to the basket, and then tossed a "behind the head
    pass" to Lou Roe.  Padilla was fouled before the pass.  Calipari
    absolutely glowered at Padilla.  Then Padilla turned it over on a
    bullet pass into the third row, and Kellogg was back in.
    
         The beauty of Padilla this season, over the past two years, is
    that he plays within himself, and doesn't turn it over 7 times a game.
    
         I agree that Kellogg was ultra conservative on the offensive end,
    and was limited athletically.  But, I can think of a lot of Top 25 teams
    from this year and last, who would have been better off with Kellogg at the
    point, than their incumbent.  Can you say ..... Georgetown?
    
    Russ
77.2303IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Mar 25 1996 14:305
>But, I can think of a lot of Top 25 teams
>    from this year and last, who would have been better off with Kellogg at the
>    point, than their incumbent.  Can you say ..... Georgetown?

Not in conjunction with the previous sentence...
77.2304I'm not down on Allen IversonMROA::RSCHOTTMon Mar 25 1996 14:347
         Let me be clear about what I just said.  Iverson is an awesome,
    awesome offensive talent!!!!!  It's just that he sucks as a point
    guard.  Put him at the 2G, let him create havoc on defense, let him
    drive/shoot his treys.  But get someone who will involve the other
    talented players on the Georgetown team.
    
    Russ
77.2305UMass *IS* Going to Win it ALL !!USCTR1::GARBARINOMon Mar 25 1996 18:049
All homage to UMass.  I've never seen man-to-man team defense like this
bunch plays.  While Georgetown can go into dry spells offensively at
times, this defensive effort had them talking to themselves.

They're more than adequate offensively, and a very good free-throw shooting
team.  Given that I believe defense plays more of a part in deciding a game
(any game) than offense, I can't see how this team can lose to anyone.
Add in the Pitino-choke factor and UMass should win by 15 Saturday.  They'll
probably have more trouble with Miss St than Kentucky.
77.2306MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Mar 25 1996 18:223
    
        Great, the 100% fatal Joe Garbarino kiss of death.
       
77.2307WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Mar 25 1996 18:243
    
    
    :-)
77.2308IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandMon Mar 25 1996 18:343
>        Great, the 100% fatal Joe Garbarino kiss of death.
 
The only way to fight this is to get Nazz involved...
77.2309TNPUBS::ALVEYWhen the going gets weird, the weird turn proTue Mar 26 1996 12:504
    Which team plays Saturday in their home uniforms?
    I assume Umass based on head-to-head and end-o-season
    ranking, but don't know for sure.
    
77.2310Just hope it's not a blowoutTNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Tue Mar 26 1996 13:4410
    I guess we'll see if UMass is indeed the #1 seed in the tourney, if
    they get to wear the white uniforms.
    
    I am really worried about Saturday.  I don't see how Kentucky can
    possibly lose.  They have so many All-Americans on their roster it
    isn't funny.  Do they have more All-Americans than any other team in
    the history of college basketball?  I can't see how any team from a
    conference like the Atlantic 10 can compete with that.
    
    NAZZ
77.2311priceless!TNPUBS::ALVEYWhen the going gets weird, the weird turn proTue Mar 26 1996 13:583
    Yeah, they've got more future NBA players on one squad
    than...say Houston in 1983...Reason for concern...
    
77.2312UMass surprisingly easilyMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Mar 26 1996 14:1628
    
      I had to laugh at Pitino after the win over Wake Forest when
     he said at the post-game press conference that even if they lose 
     it's been a good season and they will be proud of what they've done. 
     Yeah, right, Rick. You were the pre-season number one and you play 
     in a state where your team gets more attention than Charlie Sheen
     at the Mustang Ranch and you expect us to believe that you or your
     fans will be satisfied with less than the national championship.
     Got any bridges you want to unload? If UMass loses, alot of us here
     in the Bay State will be crushed but we'll soon get over it and
     utter the plaintive cry of the stout-hearted Red Sox fan, "we'll
     get 'em next year." If Kentucky loses, the loss will be hashed and 
     rehashed ad infinitum. They'll be wondering in the Blue Grass State
     if Pitino isn't just a slick salesman who can recruit but not coach.  
     There will be talk of why a team with that much highly recruited talent 
     couldn't beat "U-who?". If Kentucky loses Pitino will spend the whole 
     off-season trying to explain why and even have a small number of folks 
     calling for his head. So, Rick spare us the 'it's been fun spiel'. Your 
     season wasn't serindipitous. It ain't gravy from here on in. You had 
     damn well better win. Chances are you won't though. Your weakness is 
     one of UMass' strengths - the inside game. You have no answer for Camby
     and Tyrone Weeks, Dana Dingle and Donta Bright compound your problems.
     If you collapse on them Carmelo Traveiso and somtimes Edgar Padilla
     will make you pay. The only problem for Umass is the lack of depth in
     the back court. Charlton Clarke is two years from being a player and
     if he's in there he'll wilt under the pressure for sure. But Traveiso
     and Padilla are ironmen so Clarke won't be that much a factor. Your
     in trouble, Rick. Big trouble.
77.2313Don't Get Tired!LUDWIG::BARBIERITue Mar 26 1996 14:2820
      re: .2310
    
      You're being sarcastic, right???
    
      I think there are the following factors
    
      1) Handle the press.
    
      2) Play the same intense half-court defense.
    
      3) Don't commit too many fouls.
    
      4) Don't get tired.
    
      After reading the Globe today on Kentucky's defensive pressure
      (where its based on constant intensity reliant on at least 10
      players rotating), I am most concerned about UMass simply running
      out of gas.
    
    						Tony
77.2314RE: .2310IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandTue Mar 26 1996 14:362
You've got to veil a reverse KOD better than that...
77.2315CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Mar 26 1996 14:3917
  Both UMASS and Kentucky have had really great season. It would seem a shame
if either team or their coach were ostracized for losing one game against the
other. 

  That would seem to go against the spirit that people use to argue against my
3 game/round format, that these are college kids first who's main goal is
suppose to be getting an education.

  Seems silly to argue on one hand that this is an extra curricular activity,
not a big time sport then to argue on the other that the coach is a bumb if
the team doesn't win.

  If this really is a College activity then the only question should be, win or
lose, was it a character building experience for the players and the student
fans? If it was, then it was a successful season and the coach did his job.

  George
77.2316Others have had more talent than KentuckyGLRMAI::WILKESTue Mar 26 1996 14:497
    re 2310
    
    Adjusting for the fact we are talking about different eras the Alcindor
    and Walton era UCLA teams had more highly touted talent ( as well as
    actually talented players ) than the current Kentucky team.
    
    The 76 Indiana team was also loaded with future NBA players.
77.2317USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Mar 26 1996 16:5612
>      I had to laugh at Pitino after the win over Wake Forest when
>     he said at the post-game press conference that even if they lose 
>     it's been a good season and they will be proud of what they've done. 

Exactly what Cal-abhor-i said last week about his team.  They're the
dueling bung-holes, and they've revved it into high gear !

Hey, my team ain't supposed to be here, but I'm sure as hell going
to be pissed if they don't win it all.  You just don't get that many
chances in this format.  And for *these two* to claim they'll accept
less is a lie.  They don't recruit and coach their 'nads off just to
say, "we had a good season".
77.2318MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Mar 26 1996 17:2315
  >> You just don't get that many chances in this format.  
     
     You don't have a chance so start practicing being pissed. 
     If you get by MSU (highly unlikely) you'll only get em-
     barassed in the finals. Your guard play is too weak to
     survive what either Kentucky or UMass can throw at you.
     Kentucky would beat you by fifty. In reality though, you 
     have absolutley no reason to be pissed. Especially after 
     the way you Syracuse fans have run Boeheim down all season 
     and now he produces this - a Final Four appearance that
     nobody but nobody could have predicted. If anyone should 
     be able to take satisfaction in just getting their it's 
     Syracuse. And irony of ironies this appearance pretty much
     guarantees that you'll have Boeheim to kick around for the
     forseeable future.
77.2319SNAX::ERICKSONI'm tired of SNOW....Tue Mar 26 1996 17:2619
    
	My prediction from February still holds true today.
    
    Ron
    
    
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 77.2117              Official UMASS Athletics Note             2117 of 2318
SNAX::ERICKSON "Can the Coach..."                     7 lines  21-FEB-1996 16:42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    	I like Umass and hope the go all the way. However Kentucky beats
    Umass by 15 pts in the rematch. Umass played Kentucky the 1st game
    of the season, when Kentucky was a bunch of individual players. The
    egos are in the background and Kentucky is playing like a team now.
    
    Ron
77.2320AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellTue Mar 26 1996 17:438
    Kentucky's main weakness is its rebounding in the front line.  Pope is
    a workhouse but limited against the likes of Camby.  Numbers can take
    them so far but look for UMass to get a lot of second opportunities.
    Weeks could simply have a field day on the offensive boards.
    
    One NCAA semifinal that matched the top teams was 1974 - NC State beats
    UCLA in overtime in what is probably the best college basketball game
    of all time.
77.2321Ryans should have checked the Glove archives firstAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellTue Mar 26 1996 18:1212
    I had a chuckle this morning from Bob Ryan's article on one George
    "Trigger" Burke a noted UMass personnage who played basketball there in
    the '50s and has been a big supporter since.  The joke is in the
    nickname which Ryan attributes to George's propensity for tossing them
    up a la Jack "the shot" Foley.  However Burke's were always called
    Trigger after the original Trigger Burke the Charlestown hitman of the
    50s.
    	Whether Trigger was in on the Brinks job I can't recall but he was
    a celebrated Boston mobster of the era like "Specs" O'Keefe and others.
    
    	Of course nowadays we have our own Chainsaw "Trigger" Way known for
    beating the dead horse of Steve Kaspar sips.
77.2322XTATIC::CHILDSTue Mar 26 1996 18:3220
Tony, I think Tommy is right on in his prediction. Umass just blasted
Georgetown who plays as much pressure defense as Kentucky and has bigger
people inside as well. Sure KU can shoot straighter than Georgetown but if
they can't turn Padilla and Travesio over they're in trouble unless they
shoot 60+%. Cause you know they ain't going to get 3 or 4 shots everytime
down the court or uncontested layups. Perhaps Pitino realizes his goose is
cooked and that why he's preaching a fun season.......

As far as SU goes they have enough size to play with MSU and after doing what
no one has expected out of them it's tough to go against them. It's going to be
interesting to say the least. I hope my aunt can find some disgruntled UCAN'T
fan who bought tickets thinking Allen and co. were a shoo-in for me....

Going to be tough though when nosebleed seats are bring in 950 bucks and
courtside seats 8K with the scalpers and powerbrokers down in NY. No wonder
why were such basketball bigots in the East. 950 is generally the courtside
price anywhere else in the country. Sure the Meadowlands is smaller than most
venues but the going prices speak volumes for what fans in the East think
of basketball.........
77.2323USCTR1::GARBARINOTue Mar 26 1996 19:2220
>     In reality though, you 
>     have absolutley no reason to be pissed. Especially after 
>     the way you Syracuse fans have run Boeheim down all season 
>     ..........If anyone should  be able to take satisfaction
>     in just getting their it's Syracuse.

Well, maybe "pissed" is the wrong word.  How's "disappointed" ?
When you get so close (and it takes 4 wins to get there), I don't
know how anyone can just say, "it was great just getting here".
Sure I'm thrilled that this bunch is in the Final Four.  I'm
sure I wouldn't feel this way if I had a team that was expected
to be here.  But, you can't just say "that's it".  And with
numerous examples of David beating Goliath in the not-too-distant
past, no way you find happiness in just getting there.

And NO Syracuse fan has run Boeheim down just this year.  We've
done that every year.  In fact, this year we've all acknowledged
the good job he's done with a team that wasn't expected to even
make the tournament...thus the slogan, "Boeheim Does More With Less",
which has been stated since preseason.
77.2324WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Wed Mar 27 1996 10:2619
    
    The fans' relationship to Boeheim is a strange one.  Sure, us
    SU fans have, over the years, taken our shots at him, and probably
    would not really mind if he moved on.  But look at the old notes,
    and you'll also see a begrduging affection for what he's done,
    an often painful recognition, that, sheesh, as much as he drives us
    nuts, look at all he's done.  We've all posted our "look at the
    Beoheim silver lining" material.
    
    And after this year, I'll likely lay off the guy myself for a while.
    
    What can you do?  He's the coach you love to hate on a team the
    rest of the world loves to hate.  It's real frustrating.
    
    I'll tell you this, though, of my two favorite sports teams, the
    Pats and the Orangemen, I'll take Beoheim any day, ANY DAY over 
    Parcells.  Talk about slicksters....
    
    - Sean
77.2325IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandWed Mar 27 1996 11:3715
RE: Boeheim

>    And after this year, I'll likely lay off the guy myself for a while.

I won't.  Someone has to stay the course.

I will admit that he's gotten better - he's no longer atrocious...

-----------------------

How deep does UMass really go in terms of effective players?  I know there's
Weeks, but who else puts in what you'd consider quality minutes?  I see 
Norville in the boxes a lot but I haven't got a good feel for what he
contributes.  And I see Charlton Clarke's name bandied about, but typically
in the same sentence as "he's not ready".
77.2326One fan's opinion of the UMass BenchMROA::RSCHOTTWed Mar 27 1996 12:3639
         Regarding the UMass bench, I offer the following:
    
    Tyrone Weeks - Strong rebounder, somewhat foul prone but can lay his
      big body on inside players and defend reasonably well.  On the 
      offensive end, he has good footwork and some quick moves, but no
      longer jumps very well due to his various foot injuries.  He relies
      on finesse to get open shots, and gets to the free throw line alot
      where he has been a solid free throw shooter.  He has been getting
      15 to 20 minutes a game, and is a very important contributor.
    
    Inus Norville - A very good athlete, but a kid with few offensive
      skills.  He throws down the occasional 8 footer, but as often as
      not he will shuffle his feet if he gets the ball on the low post.
      Most of his scores are short put backs or dunks.  He's foul prone,
      but is capable of some good, short term defense.  He's had a few
      games where he has contributed a very valuable 7 or 8 points, but
      usually he's just counted on for quick 2 or 3 minute relief jobs for
      the front court starters.
    
    Charlton Clarke - I expected a lot more from him given his high school
      hype, but injuries have set him back, and historically freshmen
      guards have struggled learning Calipari's system (Carmello Travieso
      and Derek Kellogg being two cases in point).  At least he has now
      settled down where he's handling the ball steadily.  He came in with
      a rep as a good penetrator, and with a decent outside shot.  He has
      yet to show either skill.  I still think he will be a very good player 
      down the road, but its doubtful he's going to win any games for UMass on
      his own this weekend.
    
    Rigo Nunez - Rigo is UMass' answer to the Energizer Bunny.  In games
      where the starters have come out non-focused and have needed a lift
      Rigo has received some minutes.  He has few offensive skills, and
      his ball handling is an adventure, even against the likes of St.
      Bonaventure.  He does rebound and play defense though.  I doubt we'll 
      see much of Rigo on Saturday or Monday, unless its a blowout
      either way. 
    
    Russ
           
77.2327USCTR1::GARBARINOWed Mar 27 1996 13:239
>    Charlton Clarke - I expected a lot more from him given his high school
      hype,

It's tough for a freshman, especially one who missed a good part of the
year, to break into the rotation and contribute on a veteran team that's
had only one loss all year.  The reason Lazarus Sims is a 5-yr player
is because Boeheim red-shirted him his freshman year 'cause he missed
most of early practice due to mono.  Bummer thought he'd never catch
up and the year would be wasted.
77.2328Mixed Bag for ClarkeGLRMAI::WILKESWed Mar 27 1996 14:026
    I suspect if UMass had any other depth at guard they would have
    red-shirted Clarke after his opening game one-minute foot injury.
    
    From his point of view the injury led to him getting much less playing
    time than he probably expected but on the other hand he gets to be part
    of a Final Four team and perhaps an NCAA Champ
77.2329Weeks will be needed when Camby gets into foul troubleMOVMON::DAVISWed Mar 27 1996 15:5014
    RE: Weeks
    
    He's a good rebounder, but has no hands.  Don't pass to the guy, don't
    let him dribble.  His touch around the basket has improved
    significantly over this season.  At the beginning of the year, he would
    grab the offensive rebound but couldn't put the ball back in the hoop. 
    He can now do it on a consistent basis, which is why he's one of the
    few (only?) Minutemen who is averaging more points in the tournament
    than during the season.
    
    Senior F/C Ted Cottrell was getting some minutes toward the end of the
    season, but Calipari's generosity has not extended into the tournament. 
    
    Todd
77.2330AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellWed Mar 27 1996 16:353
    As I said before, Tyrone Weeks is the Minuteman MVP of the tournament. 
    He responds to every challenge and is on the floor everytime UMass needs
    rebounding or defense. 
77.2331:^)WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Mar 28 1996 13:284
    
    Refuse to Lose!
    Except to 'Cuse!
    
77.2332OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Mar 28 1996 14:301
77.2333IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandThu Mar 28 1996 14:351
Wasn't that said before last Friday's game?
77.2334Pitino hinting that Cal is gone soon?AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Mar 28 1996 14:437
    For you UMass fans with big hopes that Calipari will be staying beware.
    His cohort Rick Pitino stated that he thinks Cal will make a great
    professional coach.  I've been guessing that Calipari has been angling
    for a package deal for him and Camby using the ncaa draft loophole and
    now with Pitino at point this is firming up.
    
    I'd say the betting is about even.  The question is What team?
77.2335He could be making a big mistakeGLRMAI::WILKESThu Mar 28 1996 14:493
    Rick Pitino lasted two years as the Coach of the Knicks. Calipari would
    not last much longer. You can't motivate NBA players with the same
    hokum that works in college.
77.2336Camby Double TeamsLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Mar 28 1996 16:3368
      I caught ESPN at 9:00 last night where they were live at Michael
      Jordan's restaurant in Chcago with three coaches; Huggins of Cin,
      Majerus of Utah, and the guy from Villanova.
    
      Majerus didn't give UMass a chance, but after losing by 30, I would
      suppose he might not want to!  He just felt the depth was too intense
      noting that their 9th player would start for anyone and their 2nd
      unit is a top 16 team.  I think he basically felt that the intensity
      of Kentucky's game would eventually wear on UMass.  
    
      Huggins and the other guy had much better things to say about UMass.
      Huggins mainly emphasized the forwards Bright and Dingle and
      stressing that it is dangerous to double team Camby and leave
      either one of them alone.  The Villanova coach praised the guards
      and contrasted their defense on Georgetown to his team's which gave
      up something like 62 points to the Hoya's guards.  He felt UMass' 
      guard effort defensively was incredible.
    
      They also showed videos of Kentucky's defensive play against Duncan -
      the double teams and showed how he even had problems passing the 
      ball.  It was noted that Kentucky singled Camby in the 1st game and
      this won't happen again.
    
      So I am especially curious as to how Camby handles the double team
      this time around.  Huggins did contrast Camby in this regard to 
      Duncan by saying that Camby can be a threat from deeper out.  I also
      think Camby is a better and a *quicker* passer and I am especially
      thoughtful of some of his touch passes.
    
      It was also mentioned that Kentucky has 50 fouls to give and it was
      suggested Camby could see foul trouble.
    
      So, my present thoughts on UMass concerns.
    
      1) Keep out of foul trouble/don't get tired.
    
      2) Handle the press.
    
      3) Have an answer for the Camby double team.
    
      #2 is the most important thing, but I rate it second as a concern
      because I think there is a good chance they will not have too much
      of a problem with the press unless #1 becomes a factor.
    
      What do you guys think of #3?  How effective do you think UMass will
      be handling the Camby double team?
    
    
      One other thing...
    
      As far as subs, Clarke scares me against the press.  I would probably
      try to play Norville and Nunez if UMass is tied or leads at least
      through the 1st half.  I concur with the other appraisel of Weeks.
      I would have to say the guards have been the players of the tourna-
      ment for UMass, but his play has been stellar (I think).
    
      My thoughts on Calipari are that he like most people has a lot of
      desires, some being very selfish and others not so.   Sure, he is 
      probably excessive about wanting to win and he probably throws a
      lot of bull, but I really think I have seen evidence that he does 
      care.  I consider a lot of replies to be rather superficial and
      trite in the sense that they seem to presume that if someone has
      some selfish trait, he is (thus) devoid of good traits.  Like most
      people, he is probably not all bad and not all good.
    
    				Tony
    
    
77.2337MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Mar 28 1996 16:4010
    
    
        Kentucky had the luxury of double-teaming Duncan in part
       because Tony Rutland, a solid three point shooter, was out 
       with a bum knee. UMass has no such glaring injuries and are
       a much better defensive team than Wake Forest or Utah and
       a more balanced scoring team than either of them as well.
       If Kentucky shows that they're going to double Marcus, I ex-
       pect to see Marcus throwing a lot of quick touch passes to 
       his teammates who will be able to make Kentucky pay.
77.2338XTATIC::CHILDSThu Mar 28 1996 18:376
Also if Kentucky does double Camby, I expect Dingle and Bright to murder them
on the boards. Kentucky's best hope is that turn over Padilla and Travesio
consistantly or take Marcus mentality out of his game where he presses on
offense and attemps to do too much. The saving grace here is that coach Cal
will not be afraid to sit Camby in order to get his head straight. Weeks' recent
play makes this decision even easier.........
77.2339USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Mar 28 1996 18:4513
>      My thoughts on Calipari
>      I consider a lot of replies to be rather superficial and
>      trite in the sense that they seem to presume that if someone has
>      some selfish trait, he is (thus) devoid of good traits.

Tony, I certainly don't think the guy is closer to being a criminal than
a saint.  I don't care for "salesmen" in general, and he's a classic
example.  I've said many times that I don't want to see him or Pitino
win a national championship.  I've never criticized Calipari's coaching
ability, I just don't like how he goes about doing his job.

Many people don't like others purely based on their looks, actions,
words, etc....  That's all it is.
77.2340USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Mar 28 1996 18:495
>Also if Kentucky does double Camby, I expect Dingle and Bright to murder them
>on the boards.

MikeC, it don't matter what Kentucky's defensive strategy is.  UMass' defense
will shutdown the 'Cats offense, and that'll be the game.
77.2341LETDOWN...COPS01::MARTINThu Mar 28 1996 20:269
    re. .2336
    
    I watched that show too, and all of the coaches are picking Kentucky to
    win the ballgame.  The only one that picked UMASS was Saunders.  One
    other concern that Huggins raised was a possible let down after the
    semi-final game (for the winner) in the final game.  Is this something
    to be concerned about or should we just take it 1 game at a time.
    
    Thomas
77.2342Can you shoot below 40% and beat UMass?MOVMON::DAVISThu Mar 28 1996 22:3837
    People have been saying UMass will get tired playing 6 or 7 players
    since the start of the season.  It hasn't happened.  No reason to think
    it should happen now.  The TV timeouts are even longer during the Final
    Four games.  Getting tired is not an issue.  These guys are in shape,
    Camby is the only one who seems to need a breather occassionally.
    
    Camby has been playing against double and triple team defense all year. 
    He was the player of the year.  He averaged over 20 points a game. 
    Double teaming him has not been an effective strategy against UMass. 
    He can pass, he has a better than average fade away jumper that gets
    over the defenders.  Kentucky's defense looked great against Wake
    Forest, but you know what, UMass beat Wake pretty good too.  
    
    UMass does have weaknesses.  They have a tendency to start slowly. 
    They will have a problem if two of their starters get into very early
    foul trouble.  They sometimes forget to defend against the long
    downcourt pass.  They are not the most efficient scoring machine in
    college basketball.  Camby sometimes goes for the block too often
    instead of the rebound (Dingle has been covering him though).  That's 
    about it.  
    
    The difference for UMass all season has been defense.  Padilla, Dingle
    and Travieso are three of the best defenders in the game.  Camby by
    just being in the lane changes so many shots that he doesn't have to
    play as intense defense as he is capable of playing.  Of all the
    starters, Bright is the most inconsistent offensively from game to
    game, but his defense is almost always solid.  And defense has been the
    difference in all their close games.  They get it done in the last few
    minutes.  Consistently. 
    
    They're a very good foul shooting team, so Kentucky's 50 fouls to give
    could mean 70 points from free throws.
    
    After the Arkansas and Georgetown game, can you tell I'm a believer? 
    If they play "UMass basketball" it almost doesn't matter who the other
    team is.  
                           
77.2343XTATIC::CHILDSFri Mar 29 1996 11:195
FWIW, Jim Harrick is also picking UMASS to win it all. Hopefully his
prognostigation's skills are better than his coaching. Don't know if
I can make it till tomorrow. I wish they were tipping off tonight!!!

mike
77.2344It Makes SenseLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Mar 29 1996 11:4519
      Mike C...man, I can't wait either!  I've been thinking about this
      with a passion!
    
      I remember UMass' box score against Wake.  Wake had like two scorers
      for the whole game.  Utah, I think, is pretty one-dimensional too.
      Everyone for UMass can score.
    
      The more I think about it, the more is just plain makes *sense* 
      that UMass will win.  So long as they stay out of foul trouble.  It
      just makes a lot of sense.
    
      One thing that hasn't been mentioned is what the Puerto Rican men's
      league has done for Padilla/Traveiso.  (I think this was mentioned
      at that show at Jordan's restaurant.)  Basically, it was said that
      they have played CBA caliber ball all summer long with adult men for
      whom this is their living.  I just feel like that'll put a little ice
      in your veins, not to mention exp.
    
    							Tony
77.2345USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Mar 29 1996 11:489
>    If they play "UMass basketball" it almost doesn't matter who the other
>    team is.  

Exactly.  Nobody's gonna beat this team unless UMass does something that
isn't *normal* for them.  I'd be more concerned about Cal-abhor-i's
decision to have them sitting around a New Jersey hotel all week, instead
of the comforts of their campus, than I would Kentucky or Miss St.
They're gonna have to come out tight, or over-psyched, to blow this
title.
77.2346OH YEAH...USCTR1::GARBARINOFri Mar 29 1996 11:515
Since there isn't an A-10 note, thought I'd let you A-10 guys know
that I was rooting for St. Joe's to beat Nebraska last night in the
NIT Final.  But I must confess that it wasn't because they are an
A-10 team, I was rooting for another small Jesuit college to whip
a_big_STATE_U.
77.2347IMBETR::DUPREZThe engineer formerly known as RolandFri Mar 29 1996 11:551
You small Jesuits sure stick together... :-)
77.2348WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Mar 29 1996 12:259
    
>    If they play "UMass basketball" it almost doesn't matter who the other
>    team is.  
    
    I disagree.  What did they do differently against GWU.  Or URI - URI
    had an awful free throw % that last game - it was the only reason UMass
    won.  Or St, Joe's and Stanford they weren't decisive victories.  Still
    a win, yes, but, I think it shows that UMass can lose playing UMass 
    basketball.
77.2349They've won against every top 25 team they've playedMOVMON::DAVISFri Mar 29 1996 16:0421
    GW game they came out real slow and never could get it closer than 8 or
    9.  That is definitely one of their weaknesses, as I mentioned.  
    
    The other reason I think they lost against GW was Koul.  Calipari had
    Camby down low against him the whole game.  His fade away jumper was
    not working and Calipari never adjusted.  I think the way UMass
    has adjusted to big men since then is to bring Camby out to the high
    post and open the middle up for Bright and Dingle.  Against GW, there
    was a crowd under the basket and UMass didn't get as many offensive
    rebounds as they should have.  Playing catch-up the whole second half
    alsow took them out of the "UMass basketball" style.
    
    URI played a great game against UMass, no question.  But the difference
    was the defense at the end of the game.
    
    UMass doesn't usually win *decisively* because of their half court
    offense (Georgetown may have actually ran themselves out of the game). 
    They score enough points to win and work hard on defense.  I think it
    shows that UMass wins playing UMass basketball. 
    
    Todd
77.2350MOVMON::DAVISFri Mar 29 1996 16:1510
    Oh yeah, the other way they're handling the big men is to put Inus
    "A10 leader in fouls/min" Norville in for Camby and make them pay for a
    few of their baskets.  Ugly, but it worked against GW in the rematch
    during the A10 championship.
    
    But I don't think Inus will be getting too much Final Four PT, unless
    Camby gets into quick foul trouble.  A real possibility if he keeps
    trying to block shots from behind the shooter.
    
    Todd
77.2351MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Mar 29 1996 16:3517
    
      Camby historically has trouble with big bruising centers.
      Kentucky doesn't one. 
    
      And for all of the talk about what an oily character Calipari 
      is anyone, who has followed UMass since John got here, can see 
      how he turned Edgar Padilla and Carmelo Traveiso from a kid from 
      Springfield and a kid from Dorchester into a pair of guards now
      considered on par with Allen and Scheffer and with Haase and 
      Vaughn and any other guard tandem in the country. The transform-
      ation of Tyrone Weeks is less dramatic but still indicative of 
      one thing - Calipari really is a teacher. He's created this thing 
      called UMass basketball and he's taught his team how to play
      it and the results are obvious. I could do without the self-
      promotion but when you have a guy who has an obvious commitment
      to his kids and who teaches the game like it should be taught,
      you can accept his small deficiencies.
77.2352.251 Applause Applause!!XTATIC::CHILDSFri Mar 29 1996 17:180
77.2353Calipari has matured, but his vision is the sameTNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Fri Mar 29 1996 17:3317
    I have noticed a lot less of the self-promotion the last few years,
    since Calipari has gotten the UMass program some national status.
    I don't think he would have handled the Mike Williams situation last
    year the way he did five years ago.  I think Calipari has matured, just
    as the program has matured.  From scrounging second tier players and
    turning them into polished college performers, Calipari now can almost
    pick and choose the kind of kid he wants in his program from any but
    the most elite high school players.  And even though UMass is now one
    of the best programs in the country I doubt greatly that you will see
    Calipari move away from the "play anybody, anywhere" scheduling that
    has becomea UMass trademark.
    
    Bottom line - Calipari had to hustle to make the UMass program get
    noticed, now he can concentrate on teaching kids how to play basketball
    and get along in life.  
    
    NAZZ 
77.2354Varying Levels of IntensityLUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Mar 29 1996 20:079
      I think the main reason UMass had the loss against George Washington,
      the close game against R.I. as well as other close games is simply
      because they could not play with the same level of intensity game 
      in and game out.  I think the same goes for Stanford.
    
      UMass' effort against Georgetown, I believe, would have blown GW
      out.
    
      Intensity will not be a problem tomorrow night.
77.2355The Great Ride is OverPOWDML::HONERGo AheadSun Mar 31 1996 05:151
    Good Game Minutemen. Thanks for a great season.
77.2356WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Sun Mar 31 1996 15:246
    
    > 'Cuse won't get by the Bulldogs.
    
    What was that again?  
    
    - Sean
77.2357'Cuse to win first ncaa championship - you heard it hereAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellSun Mar 31 1996 18:5926
    I asked the foremost mind in college basketball why Kentucky beat UMass
    and he told me "Because Kentucky made 'em and UMass missed too many". 
    What a genius.  One paper had Calipari agitated over the referees; one
    or too tough ones and always the same ref but since Camby was never in
    foul trouble how bad could it have been.
    
    One comment I've always made and that is if the other team is going to
    press you HAVE to score off the press.  Calipari stubbornly refused to
    do this - Also, Calipari never will find one strategy and stick to it -
    when Camby was used to inbound and move the ball upcourt they were
    almost always successful.
    
    I would have to say the better team one.  Also, Syracuse is going to
    beat Kentucky for several reasons:
    
    	Boeheim simply has developed a wonderfully coached team that knows
    what it is doing and is able to do it more than anyone
    	Kentucky had a very tough game and will have a let down and be over
    confident - they will probably make life very difficult at the end for
    'cuse and won't fade out like State.
    	Syracuse won't abandon the offensive boards like UMass did.
    
    Caveat - If some jerk in stripes "Cambies" Wallace with a bunch of
    cheap fouls this prediction is null and void.
    
    Billte
77.2359WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Apr 01 1996 11:1511
    
    
          So using Nazz Logic!!!
    
    
          BE >>>>>>> A10
    
    
    Right?????
    
    Chap
77.2360Gotta route for the underdog tonight!CNTROL::SALMONMon Apr 01 1996 12:185
    I won't be wearing "orange" tonight Chap, but I will be dinking it (o.j)
    
    with a fair amount of vodka of course!
    
    Go Orange!
77.2361Good luck Syracuse!MROA::RSCHOTTMon Apr 01 1996 12:1925
         It only took me about five minutes of viewing time on Saturday to
    figure out that UMass wasn't going to beat Kentucky in that game.  Sure
    I got excited inside of 5 minutes, when they made their run.  I even
    turned to the group I was with and told them I'd by a round for the 
    house if the UM'ies pulled it out (probably no more than a $75-90. outlay
    in the dive that I was in ... ;^)).  First and foremost, UMass wasn't
    able to protect the ball well enough!  Secondly, Travieso only got off
    7 shots all night!  And finally, Camby, even though he had a very, very
    good game, was taken out of the offense by the Wildcats for a least 10 or 
    12 minutes during the middle of the game.
    
         I think for Syracuse to have a chance against Kentucky they can't
    turn the ball over against the Wildcats.  They have to protect the ball
    the way they did on Saturday against Mississippi State.  If they can
    do that and control the tempo, Hill and Wallace should be able to work
    against Kentucky's soft spot, the inside!  If I was a Syracuse fan I
    would be worried though about the 'Cuse's options for beating the press.  
    When asked, Lazerus Sims basically said that he was the guy that was going
    to do it.  I'm not sure if Marcus Haynes (was he the Globetrotter guy?)
    could beat Kentucky's press by himself!  Hopefully, Boeheim is smart 
    enough to come up with a scheme to break Kentucky's press ..... UMass 
    never really found the answer.
    
    Russ
                                                                      
77.2362Game ThoughtsLUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Apr 01 1996 12:4064
  My thoughts on the game...

  It was winnable and thats' what makes it hurt, though I would rather
  it was a winnable game than not.

  To summarize, I think they lost for two main reasons.  One, Kentucky
  fared better than I would have expected against UMass' half court
  defense.  Kentucky shot 50% and I think they even had a decent percentage
  during their half court offense.  That magic 40% or under number wasn't
  close to reached.

  But, I thought the biggest factor was UMass' half-court offense and I'm
  sure much of the credit must go to Kentucky's defense.  In the 1st half,
  the offense often looked way out of synch though I never saw Padilla
  penetrate and dish off better - they did get some easy ones.

  The thing that really got me though was the 2nd half when they would get
  close with their runs.  They had that one sequence where I think they
  were down by 5 and they had FOUR GOOD LOOKS and didn't score.  One, the
  shot clock ran down and Bright had an uncontested lay-in, but lost the ball.
  (I think he was flustered by the shot clock and that did made it a tough
  shot.)  Two, Bright was called for travelling on an excellent power slam
  where he slid accross and jammed with his left hand.  I forget the 2nd
  two, but they had four good looks.

  Then they fell behind a little bit and they made another run and again 
  the half court offense deserted them when they were just about ready to
  really knock on the door.  Travieso's air of the three (if he just hits 
  the rim, its anybody's rebound - a make and its TIE score).  Camby's 
  3-point attempt.  I thought the biggest play in the entire game though
  was the 5 foot miss by Travieso (someone said it was Giddel Padilla?)
  where Bright rebounded, but fouled out.  Man, if that short shot goes 
  in, not only are they within TWO, but Bright is still in the game.  That
  was tough.  It just seemed that when they were on the threshold of getting
  even, the half-court offense just funked out.  And every time I can think
  of, it really wasn't Kentucky's doing - it was UMass decisions (and/or
  execution.  Kentucky didn't make Bright travel or commit the foul (and 
  that would've been UMass' rebound anyway).  It was really, in that sense, 
  UMass' own undoing.

  If I could isolate a single thing that really hurt UMass, it was the 
  execution of the half-court offense during those critical moments when
  they were on the threshold of tying Kentucky.  And again...it was more
  UMass' undoing than Kentucky's doing, I think.  (Unless fatigue was a
  factor.)

  The other main thing of course was the beginning of the 2nd half.  I forget
  how it happened, but having the lead balloon from 8 to 15 and having 
  Travieso pick up his 3rd and 4th fouls within a minute or so - man that
  was tough.

  But, I am certainly proud of this team.  It just hurts, thats' all.  But,
  I think the world of this team.

  UMass was awful close to being a national champion, imo.

  There is more that can be said of course, but the above is the big thing
  to me.

  I am really going to miss Bright and Dingle.  I am sad to see them go.  I
  especially really liked Bright.  Of course I'll miss Camby too should he
  decide to leave.

							Tony
77.2363Overall "D" was the keyMROA::RSCHOTTMon Apr 01 1996 13:0018
         Yeah Tony, my reply kind of focused on the press, but it really
    was Kentucky's overall defense that kept UMass from getting a
    consistent rhythm going.  The turnovers were actually pretty even.
    Kentucky capitalized with some easy baskets, but more than that, when
    UMass would finally get set up in the front court, it remained a
    struggle trying to execute their half court offense against the
    Kentucky defense.
    
         Actually, looking at a box score of the game is somewhat
    misleading.  The game was pretty even in all categories.  Four more
    fouls were called on UMass, resulting in a 22-30 versus 13-19 edge
    at the free throw line for Kentucky.  Just the opposite of the first 
    game between the two, where UMass had the big edge at the free throw 
    line.  And I'm not saying that there was anything wrong with the 
    officiating by the way.
    
    Russ
                     
77.2364From a die-hard BC fan...IAMOK::BARRYMon Apr 01 1996 13:075
    
    UMass played hard and with character.  They and their fans should be
    proud.
    
    
77.2365Yeah, But...LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Apr 01 1996 13:2219
      Russ,
    
        But, again, the thing that most 'gets' me was that the crucial
        times, it WASN'T Kentucky's defense!
    
        Kentucky didn't make Bright lose the ball or travel before the
        slam.  They didn't decide for Camby or Travieso to put up those
        threes!  I didn't tape the game, but I am pretty sure that if
        you were to look at the offensive oppurtunities when UMass got
        close, that they had GOOD OPPURTUNITIES.  They really did.
    
        This is NOT to say I am not proud of this bunch.  I really love
        this team and I'll never forget them.  I think the last reply 
        put it real well.
    
        There were warriors down to the end.
    
    							Tony
     
77.2366What Motivates This???LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Apr 01 1996 13:2515
      re: .2358
    
      What motivates your replies?  Is it trying to compensate for
      incompetent predictions?
    
      Such as:
    
      Georgetown will kill UMass when UMass wins by 24.
    
      and Kentucky by 30 when UMass loses by 7.
    
      OK...so you are typically off by 23 or more points, but you don't
      have to take your incompetence off on us!!!
    
    						Tony
77.2367MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Apr 01 1996 13:3012
    
       UMass had chances to climb back in the game but couldn't.
      Credit Kentucky for that. In my view, the game largely centered
      around the Delk-Traveiso matchup. Delk clamped down on Carmelo
      the way Carmelo has clamped down on opposing guards all season. 
      When that happened and the rest of the UMass squad didn't step 
      it up, we were in real trouble. Tough loss to swallow but it
      was a great season and even in this game there were things to
      feel good about like the play of Giddel Padilla and Charlton Clarke
      and the way the Minutemen never quit. I only hope that Marcus
      decides that he wants an NCAA title more than an NBA paycheck
      and comes back and makes another run at March Madness next year.
77.2368It was all pre-ordainedMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Apr 01 1996 14:2726
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 77.2305              Official UMASS Athletics Note             2305 of 2367
USCTR1::GARBARINO                                     9 lines  25-MAR-1996 15:04
                     -< UMass *IS* Going to Win it ALL !! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All homage to UMass.  I've never seen man-to-man team defense like this
bunch plays.  While Georgetown can go into dry spells offensively at
times, this defensive effort had them talking to themselves.

They're more than adequate offensively, and a very good free-throw shooting
team.  Given that I believe defense plays more of a part in deciding a game
(any game) than offense, I can't see how this team can lose to anyone.
Add in the Pitino-choke factor and UMass should win by 15 Saturday.  They'll
probably have more trouble with Miss St than Kentucky.
    
                <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                                  -< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 77.2306              Official UMASS Athletics Note             2306 of 2367
MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove"              3 lines  25-MAR-1996 15:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Great, the 100% fatal Joe Garbarino kiss of death.
       
77.2369"A great season fought hard"AKOCOA::TROYMon Apr 01 1996 14:3423
    
    re: .2358
    
    Given the 9 point spread, the 1 vs. 2 rankings, etc. how a loss to
    Kentucky becomes a CHOKE is beyond me. I guess we consider the source.
    
    For my view, the lack of outside shooting hurt us - give the credit to
    Delk.  We also missed quite a few 'easy' finishs during our run that
    did hurt.
    
    Although I didn't know Pitino that well when I was a pledge at Lambda
    Chi Alpha - I must say I found myself feeling good for Rick, and proud
    that we had achieved so much when few 'experts' picked us for better
    than final 8 or so.
    
    UMASS kept trying to get over the top and has nothing to apologize for
    in its effort or the season results - 35 and 2 is still an asonishing
    record.
    
    BT
    
    
    
77.2370It is one tough tourneyWONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Apr 01 1996 14:4612
    
    I'll eat some crow here, folks.  I didn't pick UMass to go very
    far this year, and even said publicly BC would go farther in the
    tourney... so Congrats to UMass - I was definitely wrong.  They're
    a good team, who perhaps just got a little to nervous with all
    the Kentucky-UMass hoopla going on.
    
    My team's last three NCAA shots ended in overtime losses, once
    to UMass, so I understand losing sucks.  Hope you get Camby for
    one more year!
    
    - Sean
77.2372WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Mon Apr 01 1996 15:039
    
    
       I also gotta say I too was proud of the way UMASS played all year as
    our state school. My love of the Big East withstanding I wouldn't have
    been upset if they won it all. Especially the way they dispatched my
    Hoyas.
    
    
    I loce College Bball
77.2373When Rational Thought Fails...LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Apr 01 1996 15:538
      I didn't fall off the bandwagon!!  What are you talking about?
      I just got real into it (as I usually do) and I go into 'mourning'
      for awhile!
    
      I have been a Green Bay Packer fan for life and I DID NOT ever 
      get off their bandwagon all those years they stunk.
    
    						Tony
77.2374They will finish with the best college bb record: 35-2TNPUBS::NAZZAROWell, 37-1 ain't so bad!Mon Apr 01 1996 15:5537
    UMass could have won.  Not should have, could have, so I guess that I'm
more disappointed than upset.  There are several points in the game that
stand out for me:

1) The second foul on Travieso was really a reach on Padilla, but the ref
got the wrong Puerto Rican.  That affected the entire game.

2) Missing good opportunities on four straight possessions down six in the
middle of the second half hurt.

3) Donta shoulda let Pope dunk when he was alone with 4 minutes left.  That
was his fourth foul, and he fouled out on our next possession. 

4) Of course, if Carmelo hits the little follow in the lane Donta doesn't
foul out then, either!

5) And that still is not a foul on Donta, but having it be his 5th made it
an even worse call.

6) Giddel gave the team a real lift, unbelievably!

7) I didn't mind Travieso's airball at 63-60, even if it did miss badly.

8) I thought Edgar's 3-pointer with 42 seconds left was going in.  If it did, 
we're only down one, and we would have won the game.

9) I don't like Ed Hightower as a ref.  I knew we were in trouble as soon as
I saw him out there.

10) If you told me before the game that Giddel Padilla would be our leading
scorer off the bench with four points, I would have thought garbage time
started early.

11) It was a tremendous, tremendous season.

NAZZ
    
77.2375One college game decided by the refsAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellMon Apr 01 1996 16:2413
    Nazz is Ed Hightower the bald ref who looks about my age?  He isn't by
    any chance one of the refs from last year is he?
    
    But you want to talk ref'ing.  Conneticut women got an awful hosing on
    Friday night.  College women deserve better refereeing even if it means
    assigning the most qualified referees regardless of sex to the games.
    Part of the problem may be that the refs don't know how to call a
    woman's game and won't call it the same way a men's game would be
    called.
    
    The play was a clean Kara Wolter's block giving her four (she shortly
    thereafter fouled out) and Tenn the foul shots.  UConn got it to ot but
    didn't have Kara and finally lost.  Nice effort by the Huskies.
77.2376YupLUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Apr 01 1996 16:5010
      Nazz,
    
      I too wasn't disappointed that Traveiso attempted that long three.
      I wasn't so sure it was bad shot selection.  I also thought the
      single most significant play was Carmelo's follow-up miss.  Make
      it and its a two point game and Bright is still in it!
    
      Very winnable game.
    
    						Tony
77.2377Too 'Into It'!!!LUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Apr 01 1996 18:161
    I get too involved.  I'm still bumming bigtime!
77.2378Had to keep them under 40% shooting to winMOVMON::DAVISMon Apr 01 1996 19:5121
    Kentucky played great swarming in-your-face pressure defense.  They
    traviesoed Travieso, but UMass should have been able to adjust to it. 
    
    UMass couldn't keep up with Kentucky on defense.  They kept it close,
    but couldn't get the big stops when they needed them.
    
    I was definitely wrong about the fatigue factor; even with Calipari's
    first half substitutions, they still got worn down by that defense.
    
    And UMass doesn't have an efficient enough offense to come back from
    double digits so late in the game.  Missing 4 good looks at the basket
    late in the second half hurt, but they were too worn out to play
    defense the rest of the way to keep Kentucky from scoring.
    
    Unbelievable effort by both teams.  Kentucky just had too much for
    UMass to handle.
    
    Great season.  Marcus will be back, and if Larry Ketner is as good as
    they say, I see another Final Four appearance happening. 
    
    Todd
77.2379Next YearLUDWIG::BARBIERIMon Apr 01 1996 20:3512
      I know its premature, but the Globe discussed UMass' future.
      The most optimistic scenario, of course, had Camby and Weeks
      coming back.  The following was suggested (something like this)...
    
    		PG	Padilla/Clarke
    		2G	Traveiso
    		C	Norville/Ketner
    		PF	Weeks/Ketner
    		SF	Camby
    
      I think that was it.  Pretty powerful looking front line I think!
      They also discussed the people coming in.
77.2380MKOTS3::SMILLERMon Apr 01 1996 20:383
    
    	If Weeks comes back.  I read (Not sure where) that weeks is
    thinking of not comming back because of his foot.
77.2381WeeksLUDWIG::BARBIERITue Apr 02 1996 13:269
      Yeah, I know he might not come back and that is why I included
      Weeks in a most optimum scenario, i.e. I would have had no
      reason to mention him unless there is the possibility he may
      not return.  The Globe had a fairly detailed article on Weeks.
    
      The way it sounded, his foot was killing him and he was in
      constant pain.
    
    						Tony
77.2382UMass continues to play anybody, anywhereTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks UMass for a great season!Thu Apr 04 1996 14:4424
     	The UMass Basketball WWW Site lists the following tentative schedule
	for next year:

	11/23-11/27	Maui Classic (7 other teams)
	12/3		Great 8 Tourney 
	12/7		Boston College @ Fleet Center
	12/11		Home Game (possibly Georgia Tech)
	12/14		@ Wake Forest
	12/20		No. Carolina (Jimmy V Classic)
	12/27		Home Game (to be announced)
	12/30		Manhatten @ Puerto Rico
	1/4		Maryland @ Worcester Centrum

	One other non-conference game, either away at Duke or against a yet
	unnamed team as part of the A-10/Conference USA Challenge.

	Non-conference game with **** UCONN **** (details to be worked out).

        Another terrific schedule, sure to be ranked among the toughest in 
	the country.

	NAZZ
    
77.2383SNAX::ERICKSONThu Apr 04 1996 15:025
    
    	Playing against Manhattan in Puerto Rico is thank you to
    Padilla and Travieso, who will be seniors next year.
    
    Ron
77.2384XTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 04 1996 15:058
Great we get to see Gary "Whinner" Williams this year. Who is Maryland loosing
this year? I believe they loose Rhodes but have no idea bout the rest. Should
be a good one. I hope Camby stays. Certainly he could use a little more bulk
but even more than that I think he needs to get his mental game and leadership
qualities down pact before entering the NBA. He's so emotional he could be the
next Donyell Marshall, although he does have better skills......

mike
77.2385BIGQ::MCKAYThu Apr 04 1996 15:178
    It just never stops eh Mikey.....
    
    Donyell's not doing bad enough in the pro's.......
    
    Donyell was a great college player, better than Camby hands down.
    Better shot blocker, much better shooter, can run the court......
    
    Jimbo
77.2386Nothing Like A Hearty Laugh...LUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Apr 04 1996 15:2710
    re: -1  
    
    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
    
    If anyone hears anything about Weeks' thoughts and how his foot
    (feet?) is (are?) doing, let me know.
    
    I kind of think Camby is gonna stay.
    
    						Tony
77.2387I'll look it up if you wantODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsThu Apr 04 1996 15:357
    I'll try to post the MD info.  Rhodes, maybe Hipp too.  Profit(?) is a
    freshman, as is their center, Ezeikiel(sp).  Not sure who they
    recruited.  The Terps looked lost this whole year, occasionally
    displaying a team effort that got them a win.  The loss of Smith hurt
    (no Sh*t, Sherlock) and Hipp's disappearing act didn't help either.

    UMDan 
77.2388playing like a 2nd rounderXTATIC::CHILDSThu Apr 04 1996 16:351
He's not doing good enought to warrant being the 3rd pick in the draft...........
77.2389Good Article On CalipariLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Apr 04 1996 17:0713
      Good article on Calipari in today's Globe.  The guy seems to
      have so many characteristics that you'd want a good coach to
      have - in this case, not looking back.
    
      He has no urge to see film of the game.  He said he hasn't seen 
      it yet, but will see it (I think he said) in August mainly for 
      coaching purposes.
    
      He said the main reason they lost was that UMass didn't get as
      many of the loose balls and rebounds as usual.
    
      Another thing he said was that he was absolutely convinced that
      the winner of UMass/Kentucky was going to win the next game.
77.2390UMass Signs Ajmal BasitLUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Apr 11 1996 12:196
    Umass signed some guy from Jersey City New Jersey named Ajmal Basit.
    According to the paper, he's the fifth player signed.
    
    Anybody know about this guy?  Anyone know about the other four???
    
    						Tony
77.2391UMass not rebuilding, just reloadingTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks UMass for a great season!Thu Apr 11 1996 13:3421
    Amjal Basit is the best player on the #1 HS team in the country.  He is
    listed by most publications as a top 50 player.  Basit is 6-9, 230, and
    averaged 16 points and 15 rebounds last year in leading St. Anthony's
    to a 31-0 record.
    
    THe other recruits are:
    
    - Mike Babul  6-7 SF/2G from North Attleboro MA.  First team all state,
      great outside shooter, a Top 50 player.
    - Winston Smith 6-5 swingman from New Jersey.  Explosive scorer, very
      quick, another Top 50 recruit.
    - Monty Mack  6-2 guard from the #1 team in Massachusetts, South
      Boston.  Team leader, great 3-point shooter, in the Top 50-75 range.
    - Chris Kirkland  6-6 forward from Pittsburgh.  Great leaper, runs
      court well, finishes well on break, a Top 100 recruit.
    
    Before officially signing Basit, I saw UMass ranked between 4th and 8th
    in the country with this recruiting class.  Getting Basit in the fold
    should keep them among this year's top recruiting classes.
    
    NAZZ
77.2392WOW!LUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Apr 11 1996 14:1212
      Nazz,
    
        There's only one thing I can say.
    
    
        WOW!
    
        3 TOP 50'S?  1 in the 50-75?  1 in the 75 to 100?
    
        Oh man...what is Calipari going to do with that kind of talent?!!
    
    						Tony
77.2393re ;-1AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellThu Apr 11 1996 15:362
    Hand it over to his successor with the words , "I got you this far, now
    you're on your own"
77.2394recruitingMROA::RSCHOTTThu Apr 11 1996 16:4939
         One thing that I like about Coach Cal's recruiting philosophy is
    that he focuses his recruiting on the high school national powers. 
    While he rarely gets a Top 25 type individual talent, he often gets
    solid players from places like Bronx St. Raymonds, Baltimore Dunbar,
    Jersey City St.Anthony's and Springfield (Ma.) Central.  These are
    high school programs who play the best schedules, and which are
    year in and year out rated highly in polls such as the USA Today Top 25.
    
         To add to Nazz's synopsis, I've heard very good things about 
    Basit, Kirkland and Mack.  Basit is supposedly a very good rebounder
    and defender, who is just starting to develop his offensive game.
    Monty Mack is very solid both offensively and defensively, has no real 
    weakness in his game, and is reputed to be a vocal leader as well.
    And Kirkland may be the "sleeper" in the bunch.  I've heard him
    described by his AAU Coach as a "Will Herndon who can shoot".  Kirkland
    put up big numbers as a junior and senior at his suburban Pittsburg
    high school.
    
         I'm less bullish on Mike Babul and Winston Smith, the two highest
    rated UMass recruits.  Babul had a great summer last year playing in
    the camps and in AAU ball against national calibre talent.  However he
    plays in a relatively weak high school league in Massachusetts, didn't
    put up great numbers as a senior, and his team didn't go far in the
    State High School Tournament.  Some people question his overall
    athletic ability.  Winston Smith played on the same high school team
    as Shaheen Holloway, St.Patrick's (NJ).  As Nazz said he's supposed to
    be a very good outside shooter and overall scorer, but he's not that
    quick and not a great jumper.
    
         Of UMass's new players, I still think the guy to watch is Lari
    Ketner.  I was listening to Ted Sarandis's program on WEEI during the
    Tournament, and he quoted Bruiser Flint as saying back in November,
    that "if Ketner was eligible he would have been the second best player
    on the UMass team".  At 6'10" and 275 lbs., its pretty obvious that 
    Ketner will be installed at center, and Marcus Camby will be moved to
    forward (if he opts to return) next year.
    
    Russ 
        
77.2395Mike Babul is the real dealTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks UMass for a great season!Thu Apr 11 1996 17:5919
    I must disagree with you about Mike Babul, Russ.  His team made it to
    the EMass semis and lost to a Brookline team who slowed the game down. 
    FInal score was 50-45, and Mike had 23 of North Attleboro's total.
    Mike is not a numbers only kind of player - he does everything well. 
    Reminds me a lot of Dana Dingle.  I expect him to battle for a starting
    position next season.
    
    As for Monte Mack, he was honored at half time of last night's Celtics
    game for winning a state contest in 3-point shooting, making 19 in 60
    seconds.  I don't know how much time he will get as a freshman behind
    Travieso and Padilla, but he could have a Carmelo-llike career as far
    as playing time goes.
    
    I would agree with you that of the five recruits, Smith will probably
    see the least amount of time, especially if Camby and/or Weeks do not
    return.  Basit will battle for a starting PF spot if they are not on
    the team, and Kirkland could see a lot of minutes as well.
    
    NAZZ
77.2396MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveThu Apr 11 1996 18:5626
    >> One thing that I like about Coach Cal's recruiting philosophy is
    >> that he focuses his recruiting on the high school national powers. 
    >> While he rarely gets a Top 25 type individual talent, he often gets
    >> solid players from places like Bronx St. Raymonds, Baltimore Dunbar,
    >> Jersey City St.Anthony's and Springfield (Ma.) Central.  These are
    >> high school programs who play the best schedules, and which are
    >> year in and year out rated highly in polls such as the USA Today Top 25.
    
       I think that's a very good point. Besides the schools mentioned,
       Monte Mack went to South Boston, the two-time state Division 1
       champs. These kids already have played under some pressure and
       for very good coaches. Bright and Dingle came in with solid
       bases that coach Calipari just added to. Hopefully, that'll be
       the case with these new recruits. I tend to think that next year
       Padilla and Traveiso won't have to log the minutes that they did
       this year. Clarke came on at the end of the year and Calipari
       will want to get some minutes for Mack and co. to get ready for
       when Traveiso, Padilla, Weeks and Camby leave. Yes, I think
       Camby will be back for another run at it all. Unless something
       goes drastically wrong he'll not lose any money. If anything he'll
       gain because I think there are some questions about his stamina
       (intentionally planted by coach Calipari?) and his playing weight. 
       Another year could well do for him what another year did for John 
       Wallace. I think Calipari, wth this recruting class, is well on
       his way towards his goal of creating a Duke like program that
       could make a move to the Final Four 7 of 8 years.
77.2397IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Apr 11 1996 19:1818
>      Another year could well do for him what another year did for John 
>      Wallace.

I'm not sure I agree with this, although I'm all for kids staying in the
full four years.

As mentioned before, Camby is National Player of the Year.  From a basketball
standpoint, there's an upside to him staying (the strength/stamina issue), but
not a really big one - even with that one knock against him, he'll go in the
top 3 picks.

In Wallace's case, you're talking about a guy who was a low 1st-round/high
2nd-round pick who made himself into a lottery pick by improving his
rebounding (8.2->8.8 pg) and his 3-pt shooting (41%, I believe), and then
added to it by practically *carrying* his team to the national final.

Camby probably wouldn't get "carrying" credit like Wallace did simply because
he has a better supporting cast.  That may not be fair, but that's the case.
77.2398small point...USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Apr 11 1996 20:314
>Camby probably wouldn't get "carrying" credit like Wallace did simply because
>he has a better supporting cast.  That may not be fair, but that's the case.

...and he didn't make it to the National Final.
77.2399USCTR1::GARBARINOThu Apr 11 1996 20:3927
>                 -< UMass continues to play anybody, anywhere >-
>	11/23-11/27	Maui Classic (7 other teams)
>	12/3		Great 8 Tourney 
>	12/7		Boston College @ Fleet Center
>	12/11		Home Game (possibly Georgia Tech)
>	12/14		@ Wake Forest
>	12/20		No. Carolina (Jimmy V Classic)
>	12/27		Home Game (to be announced)
>	12/30		Manhatten @ Puerto Rico
>	1/4		Maryland @ Worcester Centrum

Doesn't this look very similar to their schedules of the last couple of
years ?  ie: they're playing good programs, but the SAME programs ??

And Nazz, that "reloading" line used to be used at Syracuse WAAAAYYYY back
in the '80s.  So yes, your program is *coming*.


Tony, don't fall into the same trap as the others.  You're trying too hard
to rationalize why staying at UMass is the *right* decision.  The ONLY
reason for Camby to stay is because he WANTS TO !!  All this bullshit
about him being too thin, and needing to work on his game is a crock.
He can gain weight and work against REAL PROFESSIONALS and not give
up a year's salary to do it.  And he won't have to worry about passing
out again and never getting the dough.  The kid is only staying if
being in college and playing for another run at the Final Four means
more to him than one year of what, $5M ???
77.2400But, I WANT Him To Stay!!!LUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Apr 12 1996 12:3711
      Joe,
    
        It took me about a month to come to terms with the reality
        that Green Bay actually lost to Dallas!  (OK, I exagerrate,
        a couple weeks).  UMass' loss to Kentucky was perhaps as
        difficult to accept.
    
        Please understand that in this case, you are not dealing
        with a rational person!
    
    						Tony
77.2401MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Apr 12 1996 12:5712
    
  >>                            -< small point... >-
    
>Camby probably wouldn't get "carrying" credit like Wallace did simply because
>he has a better supporting cast.  That may not be fair, but that's the case.

 >>...and he didn't make it to the National Final.
    
    That's not a small point, that's absolutely no point. Wallace and
    company did just what UMass did - lost to Kentucky. If the roles
    had been reversed we wouldn't have had that annoying and now infamous
    "In the house" note.
77.2402Not quite trueGLRMAI::WILKESFri Apr 12 1996 13:039
    re .2391
    
    >Monty Mack 6-2 guard from the #1 team in Massachusetts
    
    To split hairs this is technically incorrect. Although South Boston did
    win the Division 1 State Title they ended up ranked #2 in the state in
    the final Boston Globe poll. Milton the Division 2 State Champ which
    beat South Boston when they met during the regular season was ranked
    #1.
77.2403SNAX::ERICKSONFri Apr 12 1996 14:146
    
    	With a rookie salary cap in the NBA, the most a NBA team could
    pay Marcus is 2.6 million. If Marcus stays he will just get an
    insurance policy from Lords of London.
    
    Ron
77.2404MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Apr 12 1996 14:208
   >> With a rookie salary cap in the NBA, the most a NBA team could
   >> pay Marcus is 2.6 million. If Marcus stays he will just get an
   >> insurance policy from Lords of London.
    
      I've heard that too. Don't know how accurate it is though.
      Right now, Marcus is a very nice player. Put a little weight 
      on him, let him play a year as a forward and he could be a 
      franchise. He has that much ability. 
77.2405can't be whooping it up after a basketXTATIC::CHILDSFri Apr 12 1996 15:289
marcus needs to stay simply because he's not mature enough for the pros mentally
imo. While more weight would be nice it isn't mandatory for him to be successful
at the next level. He does need to get his head together though. I'm not sure
he's ready to be just another player instead of the BOC is and will be if he
stays. In Wallace's case I think the maturity he showed this year was every bit
as important as his 3 point shot.........

mike
77.2406Where does the money come from for the policy?GLRMAI::WILKESFri Apr 12 1996 16:007
    A Lloyd's of London policy will be pretty expensive for two reasons:
    
    	o Camby's mysterious blackout
    	o Lloyd's of London has been losing money big time in recent years
    
    This raises the question of where will the money come from to buy a
    policy on Marcus
77.2407WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Apr 12 1996 19:1326
    
 > >>...and he didn't make it to the National Final.
 >   
 >   That's not a small point, that's absolutely no point. Wallace and
 >   company did just what UMass did - lost to Kentucky. If the roles
 >   had been reversed we wouldn't have had that annoying and now infamous
 >   "In the house" note.

    Um, I don't think so  :^)
    
    Who the heck did UMass beat on their way to the Final Four?  Anything
    tantamount to beating Georgia, Miss St., *AND* Kansas?  Did SU get to play
    their first 2 rounds virtually on home turf, like UMass?  Very 
    probably, Umass could have been out earlier, given a different
    seed, like most years.  How much easier could it have been for them?
    
    Sorry, UMass didn't do what SU did, although they both did lose to
    Kentucky, you're right about that. 
    
    If the seeding favored UMass, you would accept NO excuse for somebody
    downplaying how the M-men got to the Final, and would probably start
    the "no respect" note up again.  Gotta give SU their credit here and
    consider them at least equals to UMass.
    
    - Sean
    
77.2408da troof...IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Apr 12 1996 19:4011
Trying to wade through the knee-deep BS and posturing from JoeG, Sean,
Tommy, and Nazz (who got lost in the Phoenix Coyotes note...):

1)  SU went one more round than UMass?  Big deal.  They both ran into the
    same buzzsaw.  Neither of them won the whole enchilada, and if the
    brackets were different, the situation would have been perfectly 
    reversed.

2)  UMass beat SU in December?  Big deal.  Teams change between December
    and March - there's *no* guarantee that the second game would be 
    anything like the first.
77.2409MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveFri Apr 12 1996 20:1314
 >> 1)  SU went one more round than UMass?  Big deal.  They both ran into the
 >>  same buzzsaw.  Neither of them won the whole enchilada, and if the
 >>  brackets were different, the situation would have been perfectly 
 >>  reversed.
    
     My point exactly. Sean is out of his tree if he really thinks
     Syracuse has to be considered the equal of UMass. Even forgetting
     that earlier in the year UMass beat Syracuse like they stole some-
     thing, UMass also completely smoked Big East bully Georgetown and
     SEC prennial Arkansas while Syracuse was just getting by by the skin 
     of their teeth. Nice season, boys but let's not make more of it 
     than it was and what it was was a nice run against a soft draw.
     
77.2410IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Apr 12 1996 20:2521
>     Even forgetting
>     that earlier in the year UMass beat Syracuse like they stole some-
>     thing

Obviously you won't, since you felt the need to add this to a sentence
that already made your case rather well.

I've tried to remain as neutral as possible throughout the sallies back and
forth, but one thing has become evident to me.  If UMass fans had to listen
to the crap that SU fans have to, the resultant written complaints would
clog the remains of our corporate network.  Instead, I just see comments
about how arrogant we are.  I guess there's safety in numbers.

Although UMass was the better team throughout the year, I wouldn't completely
discount the possibility of SU beating them in the tournament.  But I 
refuse to get into any chest-beating over who ended up better than who.
The season is over.  Neither team won.  Time to move onto baseball, the
Masters, the NHL playoffs, whatever else floats your boat.

Signing off - to those of you headed to the Red Sox Pats Day game - have a
great time!
77.2411Syracuse == UMass: give me a breakWRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatFri Apr 12 1996 20:4527
RE: Syracuse

>    Gotta give SU their credit here and
>    consider them at least equals to UMass.

give me a break. 

You're right in that you have to give Syracuse a bit of credit in that they
played their best basketball at the right time. On the other hand, it's
outrageous to consider them the equals of UMass this year. 

Syracuse clearly benefitted from an easy draw that brought them to the title
game. If they had been in any bracket other than the West, there is no way they
make it to the Meadowlands. Your claim is that because Umass faced a similarly
weak draw (which I think is false; Stanford/Arkansas/Georgetown >>> Drexel/
Georgia/Kansas/Mississippi St.), Syracuse is on a par with UMass. This is
ridiculous. 

Face it, Syracuse was the FOURTH best team in the Big East and happened to play
well at the right time. They had a fine season in the end but played
inconsistently throughout the year and was noone's pick to win the tournament
going in.

UMass had a far superior season and beat every team it played this year (they
also beat the only 2 teams they lost to).

Chris
77.2412WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Fri Apr 12 1996 23:4711
    
> I've tried to remain as neutral as possible throughout the sallies back and
> forth, but one thing has become evident to me.  If UMass fans had to listen
> to the crap that SU fans have to, the resultant written complaints would
> clog the remains of our corporate network.  Instead, I just see comments
> about how arrogant we are.  I guess there's safety in numbers.
    
    See?  Doesn't it get to you after a while?  I commend you
    for holding out this long, though...  :^)
    
    - Sean
77.2413Who's not giving who a break?WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Sat Apr 13 1996 00:1041
    
> give me a break. 
> 
> You're right in that you have to give Syracuse a bit of credit in that they
> played their best basketball at the right time. On the other hand, it's
> outrageous to consider them the equals of UMass this year. 
    
    You know, if anybody said something like this about UMass, had the
    seedings been reversed and SU played Kentucky first, many would
    have been inconsolably outraged at the similar talk.
    
    UMass and SU lost to the best team in the country in very similar
    games.
    
> Syracuse clearly benefitted from an easy draw that brought them to the title
> game.
    
    Uh, yeah...  I admitted that a while ago already.  While I was praising
    UMass.  Surprised this concession wasn't taken more gracefully, being 
    amongst those great fans of UMass who don't resort to "in the house"
    rantings.  Instead, it's treated with the usual scorn associated with
    SU.  But I know it's hard to be a good sport when you root for the
    team picked and seeded to win it all and you don't make the final.
    
    Did you notice, btw, that UMass, had (yet again) one of the *easiest* slides
    to the Final 4, easier than SU's.  SU overachieved.  UMass underachieved.
    The seedings bear that out, i.e., that's just the facts.
    
    I wouldn't even go on about it so much if UMass fans were the least
    bit objective about their team, but they're not.  Sure, SU had a dream
    season, a lot of luck, and they played well at the right time. 
    Admitted a hundred times already.  No wonder us SU fans get like we
    do, having to deal with this.  It's not worth being civil.
    
    SU beat a lot better teams in the tourney than UMass did.  Again,
    that's just facts.
    
    I don't discredit UMass or their fans, they were great, but I'm not going 
    to see SU get lambasted unfairly either.
    
    - Sean
77.2414USCTR1::GARBARINOSun Apr 14 1996 00:2910
>Syracuse clearly benefitted from an easy draw that brought them to the title
>game. If they had been in any bracket other than the West, there is no way they
>make it to the Meadowlands.

WHOA NELLY... There's no way you can make this statement.  They beat Kansas,
a team that was in the Top5 all year.  They beat Miss St, the team that beat
BOTH UConn and Cin, two teams that were in the Top5 most of the year.  The
way Syracuse played, there's NO WAY you can assume that they wouldn't have
made it to the Final Four if they had been in another Region...unless that
Region had UMass or Kentucky in it.
77.2415SALEM::BALL_KMon Apr 15 1996 15:417
      re: the recruiting class
    
    Does anybody know the academic status of the 5 new players ? 
    We always seem to lose one every year to prop 48.
    
                                                     KB
              
77.2416My Take On Final ChoicesLUDWIG::BARBIERITue Apr 16 1996 13:0732
      re: .2413
    
      What do you mean they underachieved?  Is beating Georgetown by
      24 and then losing a close game to the best team in the country
      underachieving?  What do you mean?
    
      I would pick UMass over Syracuse for the following reasons...
    
      Give Syracuse a slight edge for tournament performance, but NOT
      necessarily 2nd place to Kentucky on that basis.  Why?  Because
      the tournament determines the champion - and thats it.  I wouldn't
      give Syracuse much of a tournament edge because of how UMass
      blasted Georgetown who is the champions of Syracuse's conf. 
      Actually, most people had Georgetown to win the east region and
      considered them one of the top four teams in the country by the end
      of the season.  Its hard not to overlook a 24 point dismantling of
      a team like Georgetown.  Don't forget how they were considered by
      regular season's end.  
    
      Does the regular season count at all???  One loss all year for UMass.
      Victories over Syracuse, Kentucky, Wake, Louisville, etc.  
    
      I mean, come on.  You look at the tournament and if you give Syracuse
      the edge. its a slight edge what with the Georgetown game (and I 
      think if Kentucky shoots decently, the final is a blowout).
    
      You factor in the regular season which is the correct thing to do 
      for all teams save the champion and its a no-brainer.  Its not even
      close.
    
    						Tony
    
77.2417WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Apr 16 1996 13:2019
    
    >  What do you mean they underachieved? 
    
    Like I said, if you went strictly by the seedings, UMass underachieved
    because they were seeded as and to be #1.
    
    Do I really believe that means anything.  Of course not, but if I have
    to defend what SU did against some of the silly obversations made in
    here, I will use what ammo I have.
    
    And I'm not arguing that UMass had a better overall season.  But that's
    not the goal - the goal is to win the NCAA's and SU did as good as
    UMass (better, if you want to look at things literally).  There's
    people in here praising UMass's overall season that are the first to
    pound the Buffalo Bills into the ground for doing the same thing for
    as many years.
    
    - Sean
    
77.2418IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanTue Apr 16 1996 13:2113
>SU overachieved.  UMass underachieved.

Yes on the first.  No on the second.

UMass did what a #1 seed is supposed to do - get to the Final Four.  Once
you're there, you're there with other #1 seeds or the teams that beat them.
SU was a notable exception - they didn't face Purdue, but beat Kansas, who
in retrospect should have been the #1 seed.

I'm not buying into UMass "underachieving".  But I'm also not buying SU
being able to "slide" in - last I saw, Kansas and MSU were no cupcakes.
And Purdue?  Well, there's the team we should be putting in the same sentence
with "underachieved"...
77.2419Hail To The Orangemen As WellLUDWIG::BARBIERITue Apr 16 1996 17:499
      re: .2417
    
      I salute Syracuse for their FINE season.  They did an excellent
      job.  
    
      I would however honestly place UMass 2, but that is intended to
      be NO critique of Syracuse and their wonderful team/performance.
    
    						Tony
77.2420WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Tue Apr 16 1996 20:045
    
    Well, Tony, you have been objective and gracious throughout,
    and I accept your opinion in like spirit.
    
    - Sean
77.2421You're A Good Sport TooLUDWIG::BARBIERITue Apr 16 1996 20:5913
      re: .2420
    
      I wish Syracuse had BOMBED Indiana in that NCAA final!!  (I have 
      to admit, I wanted Kentucky to spank Syracuse just to make UMass 
      appear better!)
    
      I got nothing against Syracuse and actually, I feel I fell into 
      the popular posture of badmouthing Boeheim.  Now I kind of like
      the guy and feel that possibly he has been maligned.
                                                          
    						Thanks,
    
    						Tony
77.2422This is making me sickAKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellTue Apr 16 1996 21:031
    
77.2423Going, going .......MROA::RSCHOTTFri Apr 26 1996 12:0620
         The Boston Globe is quoting an unnamed source "close to the
    basketball program" as saying that Marcus Camby will hold a press
    conference on Monday to announce he's entering the NBA Draft.  The
    source also says that Camby has yet to hire an agent and could 
    conceivably decide to return to school depending on how the draft
    develops.
    
         I kind of wonder what there is to develop.  Camby will be the
    first or second pick, depending on what Tim Duncan does.  (And by the
    way, having watched both players, I can't quite understand why Duncan
    is so revered by NBA Scouts.)  I suppose Camby might have his heart and 
    his ego set on being the number one pick.  Also he might not want to 
    play for the Raptors or Grizzlies or Clippers or whatever team that 
    draws the top ping pong ball(s)!
    
         Though I was hoping otherwise, I can't at all blame Camby for
    going for the cash while his market value is at a high point.
    
    Russ
                            
77.2424IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Apr 26 1996 12:368
>    Also he might not want to 
>    play for the Raptors or Grizzlies or Clippers or whatever team that 
>    draws the top ping pong ball(s)!

Raptors or Grizzlies *can't* have the top ping pong balls.  Not that I'd
want to play for the Clippers...

I can't see why Camby *wouldn't* go.  What's left to prove?
77.2425AKOCOA::BREENYou never can tellFri Apr 26 1996 13:5311
    I still have a feeling about a Camby/Calipari combination where they
    try to get to a club with championship potential.  They'd be perfect
    for Charlotte, perhaps Detroit.
    
    Calipari right now is at his peak potential for getting a pro job and
    without his meal ticket could have some doubts about making the final
    four next year.  I don't know how they solve the puzzle of staying
    together except possibly thru the no-agent loophole leverage.
    
    Can't think of why they'd want to come to the Celtics where upside
    potential is dubious.
77.2426SNAX::ERICKSONFri Apr 26 1996 14:108
    
    	As someone else said Toronto and Vancouver can't get a top 3
    pick, the odds say Philadelphia will get the #1 pick. Camby has
    not hired an agent, so he can still pull a John Wallace and change
    his mind. You have to declare yourself eligible for the draft by
    May 12th, but can withdraw your name upto 24 hours before the draft.
    
    Ron
77.2427lack of potential HBAHBA::HAASfloor,chair,couch,bedFri Apr 26 1996 14:4215
>    I still have a feeling about a Camby/Calipari combination where they
>    try to get to a club with championship potential.  They'd be perfect
>    for Charlotte, perhaps Detroit.

Call me jaded but I see no such potential for Charlotte at this time,
with or withoput Camby and Calipari.

Now if'n Coach Cal would come to town, clean house and get his own guys
in, he would still be 4 or 5 years away. With some luck.

But don't get me wrong, I'd love to see 'em both come to town. Charlotte
is in the lottery thanks to their collective ineptitude so stranger
things have happened.

TTom
77.2429Eye Toward Bucks/Vin Baker Perhaps???LUDWIG::BARBIERIFri Apr 26 1996 17:5313
      The likeliest top two picks are the 76'ers and the Bucks.
      Being a Bucks fan, I can't help but wonder if Camby is 
      looking at them.  This is based on the assumption that he
      could know Vin Baker who also came out of Hartford, CT and
      plays for the Bucks.
    
      I'd be surprised if the top two were not two out of Philly,
      Milwaukee, Dallas.
    
      But, stranger things have happened (Orlando and their one
      ping pong ball).
    
    						Tony
77.2430GLRMAI::WILKESFri Apr 26 1996 19:094
    I saw an article somewhere within the past couple of weeks which quoted
    Vin Baker as hoping that the Bucks could get Camby.
    
    I am still skeptical whether Calipari would make a good pro coach.
77.2431POWDML::GARBARINOMon Apr 29 1996 14:438
If you listened to Calipari's comments yesterday, you have to believe that
Camby is leaving.  He said things like, "this is not about UMass, or the
state of Massachusetts...our program will go on", etc.

But I've learned to dismiss most public comments until the *official*
statement is made.  I remember a few years ago The Globe reported that
Chris Herren was going to Syracuse, and that day the kid announced he
was signing with BC.
77.2432CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Apr 29 1996 15:097
  According to the guy on WBZ this morning even if he announces he's going pro
that may not be final. It doesn't become final until he signs with an agent.

  In theory he could announce he's going pro, get drafted, change his mind and
go back to school. Or at least that's what WBZ is saying.

  George
77.2433My understanding of the processMYLIFE::mccarthyMike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468Mon Apr 29 1996 15:1612
Camby has two options if he doesn't sign with an agent:

	1) Remove himself from the draft and go back to school
	   (ie John Wallace)

	2) Stay in the draft, but opt to return to school.  The
	   team that drafts him retains his rights.

Camby could declare but then go back depending on who else comes out,
the order determined by the draft lottery, etc.

Mike
77.2434POWDML::GARBARINOMon Apr 29 1996 16:3411
>	2) Stay in the draft, but opt to return to school.  The
>	   team that drafts him retains his rights.

I don't think this is a realistic option for someone in Camby's shoes.
He's really *peaked* as a collegiate player.  IMO, only players who
believe they can better their bargaining position through their senior
year performance can take advantage of this option.  Since the drafting
team retains the rights to Camby, he doesn't have the option (next year)
to go elsewhere for more money.  He's going to get basically the same
money, with perhaps an inflation uplift (but he'll lose a year's salary
to get it).
77.2435MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveMon Apr 29 1996 16:5322
    
  >> He's really *peaked* as a collegiate player.  
    
     That's one opinion. And not one I share. Camby's
     game and his mindset could use some work, imo. 
     Marcus still has problems with bulkier players.
     (See Alexander Koul, George Washington University) 
     Much of that will be remedied when he doesn't
     have to play the post and guard centers but it's
     a big flaw in his game. And his stamina is question-
     able. After his collapse he was treated with kid
     gloves and wasn't allowed to play for more than 5-7 
     minutes at a stretch. And though he was clearly
     the best player on the Minutemen last year, he 
     was not the team leader. They played quite well
     without him on the floor. With his innate ability
     Marcus should be the first player taken in the 
     draft but if he comes out this year he won't be.
     If he stays another year and matures physically
     and mentally and emotionally and assumes the mantle 
     of leadership and makes another good run at the title, 
     I think he'll be a better player and person for it.
77.2436BIGQ::MCKAYMon Apr 29 1996 17:424
    Tommy, I think Joe was talking peaked as in bargaining/draft
    position which equates to money.  
    
    Jimbo
77.2437FABSIX::J_PAGEMon Apr 29 1996 19:224
    
    
     Camby just officially announced he is leaving UMass for the NBA....
                                                                      
77.2438ripple effect....POWDML::GARBARINOMon Apr 29 1996 19:443
I'm sure Elvir Ovcina will now decide to return to SU for his sophomore
season...  :^)
77.2440POWDML::GARBARINOMon Apr 29 1996 20:351
I'm sure no one thought Kevin Garnett was either.
77.2441CSLALL::BRULESpringtime at lastTue Apr 30 1996 12:353
    He may not be ready but the sad truth is most of the players who come
    out early aren't either which hurts the quality of play in the NBA.
    
77.2442POWDML::GARBARINOTue Apr 30 1996 13:145
>    He may not be ready but the sad truth is most of the players who come
>    out early aren't either which hurts the quality of play in the NBA.

Expansion has hurt the quality of play more than a small number of under-
classmen.
77.2443He's not a real youngsterGLRMAI::WILKESTue Apr 30 1996 13:533
    Camby is already 22 years old which makes him as old as most graduating
    seniors. He is never going to be bulky so he might as well enter the
    NBA now while his stock is high.             
77.2444Camby not a 3,4 or 5; He's a 12AKOCOA::BREENBetter days are coming bye and bye. Bull...Tue Apr 30 1996 14:0915
    Ryan is worth reading if only his quote from Jack Lehman about hearing
    the news of Dr J's leaving early in 1971 "What's wrong, did my wife
    leave me?", "Worse, Julius is leaving".
    
    Ryan "embarassed" himself by asserting that Camby will make a topnotch
    pro if only the control freaks who run the nba get out of the "Is he a
    4?, a 5?, a 3?"  His quote:  Too long essentially another McHale,
    postup smaller players, beat bigger off the dribble, "Russell-like
    shotblocking (wow, talk about embarrassment)... make the big plays like
    Erving".
    
    Ryan did come back to earth by saying Dr J is still the #1 UMass
    player.  Personally I still have a worry about whatever condition
    caused the collapse and hope that a physical training regemin that
    hopefully includes diet will prevent a recurrence.
77.2445POWDML::GARBARINOTue Apr 30 1996 15:413
I enjoyed Camby's opening line:

	"I am announcing that I am transferring to UConn."
77.2446Marcus will be a solid NBA starterTNPUBS::NAZZAROThanks UMass for a great season!Tue Apr 30 1996 19:2110
    Camby will be a fine pro.  Perhaps not a perrenial All-Star, but he
    will have a very successful career.  I still compare him to Larry
    Nance, who was a 6-11 forward for the Cavs.  Nance played both power
    forward and small forward, ran the floor well, blocked a lot of shots,
    and in general caused havoc for opponents.  Like Nance, Camby will make
    opponents adjust to his game, rather than the other way around.
    
    I just hope for his sake he doesn't get drafted by Philly.
    
    NAZZ
77.2447Toot Toot last stopWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Apr 30 1996 19:304
    
    
         BTW I must have seen 25-50 of those  maroon UMASS hats on the side
    of the road this morning. 
77.2448BeisbollMROA::RSCHOTTTue May 07 1996 12:399
         Hey, how about that UM'ie Baseball Team?  32 and 9!  It's kind of
    disappointing they haven't sneaked into the top 25, considering there
    are several teams with 20+ losses, occupying the 15 thru 25 positions.
    Of course, a couple of those teams happen to be Arizona State and UCLA,
    teams with hallowed tradition, rosters populated with future MLB
    players, and who play in tough conferences.  Still, a very good year
    by the Minutemen Baseball Team!
    
    Russ 
77.2449Camby signs a_agentHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed May 22 1996 20:4919
[www.usatoday.com]

    THERE'S NO TURNING BACK: CAMBY HAS AGENT


   AMHERST, Mass. - The last, scant hope has vanished that NBA-bound
   Marcus Camby might change his mind and play again for Massachusetts:
   he has signed with an agent. Camby, who is certain to be one of the
   first picks in the NBA draft, has signed with ProServ, the sports
   marketing company announced Monday. The announcement came as no
   surprise, since Camby had already said he intended to enter the June
   26 NBA draft. But, under NCAA rules, when a player signs with an
   agent, he can no longer remain eligible to play in college. ''Everyone
   who represents basketball players was interested in Marcus Camby, not
   only because he will command a very high salary, because we feel he's
   very marketable. He's a solid person,'' said Dewey Blanton, a
   spokesman for ProServ, which is based in Arlington, Va. He declined to
   give specifics of the agreement, saying only that it was for a number
   of years. He said the pact was reached about two weeks ago.
77.2450Baseball team looking to emulate the basketball teamTNPUBS::NAZZAROBest of luck, Marcus!Fri May 24 1996 19:0110
    Congrats to the UMass baseball team for beating Central Florida (the
    same school the basketball team beat in the first round of the NCAAs)
    8-7 in the first round of the East Regional.  The Minutemen take on
    South Florida tonight in the winner's bracket.
    
    Two notes on other first round games - Miami was upset 5-4 by Sam
    Houston State!  Florida State was sent West and clobbered NE Illinois
    16-0.
    
    NAZZ
77.2451IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri May 24 1996 19:501
Wasn't Sam Houston State formerly the Sam Houston Institute of Technology?
77.2452Marcus on the take?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 04 1996 13:4413
Wail, if'n you thougth Marcus Camby was too good to be true, it seems
that you may have been right.

It seems ol' Marcus was on the take while at UMass. A Hartord paper is
claiming that Camby 'fessed up and supposedly took cash, jewelry and cash
from sports agent John Lounsbury and lawyer Wesley Spears, both
registered and certified NBA agents.

Current rep, James Bryant of ProServ says the report is false.

Stay tuned...

TTom
77.2453CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jun 04 1996 13:556
  On WBZ this morning they were saying that this really won't hurt Camby that
much. They said nothing he did was illegal and he should still be one of the
1st 3 players drafted. If anything happens it will be the school that takes the
hit and the agents might be in some trouble.

  George
77.2454whateverHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 04 1996 14:027
Wail, I guess if'n this only punishes the school and the agents then it
must not be that bad. Oh yeah, the team might suffer and in fack have to
forfeit some games, but what the hey, ol' Marcus skates. Coach Cal's
stock will slip but who cares about that as long as this don't hurt
Camby.

TTom
77.2455WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!Tue Jun 04 1996 14:053
    
    
        Nazz watch!!
77.2456A minor personal character issue, and that's about itEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryTue Jun 04 1996 14:106
    College athlete takes cash from sleazebag agent, Non-news at 11...
    
    
    glenn
    
77.2457here comes da judgeBSS::MENDEZTue Jun 04 1996 14:225
    I smell the stench of "self righteous" NCAA coming to do investigation.
    Lets face it college basketball is the minor league of pro basketball.
    Marcus just got called up to the NBA and APPEARS to have taken some
    money earlier in his career.  Whats the big deal???
    
77.2458forget rape, drugs and other real crimes...this is BIGPOWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 04 1996 15:0213
>    Whats the big deal???

As speculated in a previous note, UMass will find out "what the big deal"
is after the NCAA is done with them.  Having been through it with my
favorite school, I feel sorry for the UMass alumni.  The cloud of the
investigation will kill recruiting this year, and the sanctions will
take away another.  I don't think even Coach Cal can slick-talk his
way through this muck.  In fact, let's see if he even sticks it out
himself.

SU just had its first quality recruiting class in 4 years (when the
report of their problems surfaced).  This kind of thing derails a
program faster than anything in college sports.
77.2459could be bad for UMassHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 04 1996 15:0916
This could possibly be a lot bigger for UMass than say Syracuse.

UMass was a contender with Camby. He's the firsted big name there since
Dr. J. The goal of UMass and Coach Cal has to be to prove that the Camby
years were no flukes and that the Minutemen can be a legitimate national
power.

If the team is hit hard after this fallout and they sink from the
horizon, it could be a long way back to prominence.

Syracuse also has the advantage of playing in a nationally televise
league, the Big East, where they build compitence against other powers
and then step up, which is basically what they did in their rebuilding.
UMass doesn't have this.

TTom
77.2460CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jun 04 1996 15:5117
  I agree this will be bad for UMASS the way being charged with witch craft was
bad for women back in the 1690's. It's time for Cotton Mather to come back from
the dead, send in the troops he sent to Salem in 1692 and drag the NCAA kicking
and screaming out of the 19th century and into the 21st.

  College basketball is big business just like the pros but unlike the pros
it's built on cheep labor. Like the Chicago Black Sox scandal that happened for
the same reason this is just the tip of the iceberg. The longer that Colleges
and Alum try to run this megabucks business on the backs of guys who don't make
enough to buy a team souvenir in the campus shop, this type of thing will just
get worse and worse. 

  No one should ever work to make someone else rich. If these kids are going
to attract multi-million dollar TV contracts they should get their fare share.
If this turns out to be true Camby will be my new hero.

  George
77.2461MKOTS3::BREENTue Jun 04 1996 15:569
    Okay George, How?
    
    How do you pay a star like Camby a grant in aid without paying a woman
    scholarship golfer the exact same stipend?
    
    So you say one brings in millions in fan, tv revenue?  Okay, what do
    you pay Travieso?  200 and Camby $300?
    
    How do you do it?
77.2462SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jun 04 1996 15:5714
    
    	If Camby did actual take the diamond necklace, gold chain, and ~
    2K in cash, plus knew his friends were benefitting, he hide it well.
    Calipari has not spoken to Marcus about the alledged incidents as of
    yet. He did say that Marcus "didn't have a car at Umass and lived in
    the dorms. I know other poor kids, some of whom were candidates for
    player of the year, who has a Jeep and lived in an off-campus 
    apartment and he didn't have any money either. Marcus' mother never
    moved and still lives in the same projects she did when he came here.
    From a University standpoint, we couldn't see anything."
    	Some believe that an agent is making the whole thing up, because
    Marcus didn't sign with them.
    
    Ron
77.2463CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Jun 04 1996 16:0416
RE                      <<< Note 77.2461 by MKOTS3::BREEN >>>

>    How do you pay a star like Camby a grant in aid without paying a woman
>    scholarship golfer the exact same stipend?
    
  Give all college athletes a percent of the profit from the gate and TV. If
your sport makes money, you get paid. If your sport loses or breaks even then
you feel lucky to have the opportunity to play. 

  Granted, people won't like it since College basketball is the last bastion
for fans who are green with envy over player salaries and just can't stand to
see athletes get paid according to what they are worth but I don't see where
they have much choice. The longer this goes on the worse it will get. Something
has got to snap. 

  George
77.2464shore pay 'emHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 04 1996 16:1022
>  Give all college athletes a percent of the profit from the gate and TV. If
>your sport makes money, you get paid. If your sport loses or breaks even then
>you feel lucky to have the opportunity to play. 

I've got no problem with the firsted idea. What I'd like to see it couple
it with incentives to stick around. Something like a progressive increase
in the rate or you only get it if'n you complete your eligibility.

My suggestion for the lot of 'em is to pay 'em what we used to call
work-study. You get about 5 bucks a hour for up to 20 hours a week for a
cool $100 a week. I used to get paid to build the sets for the drama
department. 

I think this is enough money to fend off starvation and maybe keep some
more of 'em honest.

As for the system breaking, it won't happen. No body talks about the flip
side of this in which a guy who comes in with nothing, shows he can do it
big time and leaves with a million dollar contract. Real oppression
there...

TTom
77.2465MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shoveTue Jun 04 1996 16:1012
  
     >> Granted, people won't like it since College basketball is the last 
     >> bastion for fans who are green with envy over player salaries and 
     >> just can't stand to see athletes get paid according to what they are 
     >> worth 
    
        Yeah, you *never* hear fans in any other sport complain about
        player salaries. 
    
     
        BTW - I agree that players should be compensated but your way
              of doing it won't leave anyone happy. 
77.2466et tu Marcus?MROA::RSCHOTTTue Jun 04 1996 16:1725
         I have to say that I gave Marcus Camby a whole lot more credit
    for common sense and integrity, than he displayed in accepting the
    cash and gratuities that are the subject of this allegation. 
    Supposedly the Hartford Courant has on audio tape, Camby admitting
    to accepting the loot, and an admission that he knew it violated
    NCAA rules.  He has also known for two years that he would be signing
    a multimillion dollar contract as soon as his collegiate career ended.
    If he was so desperate for the money, he should have come out last
    year, instead of dragging the whole program down with him.
    
         The NCAA supposedly gave the UMass program a good going over at
    the time of the Globe grade point scandal, and found no violations.
    I have read conjecture on the part of some this morning, that the
    sanctions that could fall out of this incident could range from 
    UMass forfeiting the 28 or so victories that Camby participated in,
    the potential loss of some scholarships, and up to NCAA probation.
    This isn't the first time a collegiate athlete has taken cash or
    gratuities from an agent.  The NCAA should be consistent in their
    handling of the case, regardless of the fact that Camby was the 
    National Player of the Year last year.  If this is a single isolated
    incident, as it appears to be, then it should be treated, and punished
    as just that.
    
    Russ
        
77.2467Yes athletes should get money but it's not easyMKOTS3::BREENTue Jun 04 1996 16:5620
    re. college athletes in a particular sport getting a percentage of the
    sports "profit".  You are forgetting that colleges are non-profit.  How
    would you compute profit without an accounting system being a place set
    up to compute profit.
    
    	Now to stay with the concept perhaps you meant % of revenue where
    there would be a benchmark figure.  But the financing of stadia, hiring
    of personnel other than athletes who would contribute to increased
    revenue and other "costs" would make the pure revenue issue not as
    simple as it might sound.
    
    	I had a note some while back about colleges signing players to
    contracts and then selling the contracts to the pro teams rather than
    getting nothing when a Camby etc signs a contract.  The college would
    also serve as an agent for the athlete albeit a biased one.
    
    	This if you think of it would end up leading to a draft of high
    school seniors and perhaps eventually to the high schools doing the
    same thing.
    s
77.2468SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jun 04 1996 17:0010
    
    	The NCAA has to prove that Umass and Calipari KNEW that Marcus
    broke the rules. If they can't prove anything, there is no sanctions
    against Umass.
    	In Theory Alan Iverson did the same exact thing, EVERYBODY saw him
    driving around town in a Mercedes BEFORE he declared himself eligible
    for the NBA draft. So Technically Iverson broke the rules, yet nothing
    will happen to Georgetown because it doesn't matter.
    
    Ron
77.2469don't think so, but ...HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorTue Jun 04 1996 17:0618
>    	The NCAA has to prove that Umass and Calipari KNEW that Marcus
>    broke the rules. If they can't prove anything, there is no sanctions
>    against Umass.

Where did this come from?

Certainly, the school is punished *MORE* if'n it had a part in the
violations, but if'n it can be shown that Marcus was a_ineligible player
do to having taken money and gifts from a_agent, the NCAA can most
certainly punish UMass. At the least, they can revoke the Ws that
happened after Camby went on the take.

The phrase used to give secondary punishments, like loss of schoarships,
etc., is "lack of institutional control". If'n the NCAA determines that
UMass shoulda knowed and shoulda done something about it, they can apply
this clause which pretty much lets 'em do what they want.

TTom
77.2470POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 04 1996 19:2213
>    	The NCAA has to prove that Umass and Calipari KNEW that Marcus
>    broke the rules. If they can't prove anything, there is no sanctions
>    against Umass.

Not in the case against Syracuse.  In fact, the NCAA acknowledged that
no one directly associated with the school did anything illegal, or
knew about illegal activity, yet sanctions came down.  TTom's "lack
of institutional control" is exactly the wording used by the NCAA
to slap SU.

I can't see how UMass is going to go unscathed.  You have the player
on tape admitting to illegal activity.  Unless the tape is bogus, I
can't see them avoiding NCAA sanctions.
77.2471SNAX::ERICKSONTue Jun 04 1996 20:2114
    
    	Here are somemore quotes from the paper. "Unless it is proved that
    Camby signed with an agent while still in school, his offenses are
    considered secondary and are not likely to lead to the forfeiture of
    any games or revenues resulting from last years 35-2 Final Four
    season."
    	As far as the sanctions against Syracuse from the "lack of
    institutional control". The NCAA would have to make a determination
    that Umass had the same "lack of institutional control". Which IMO
    would be hard to prove because Calipari himself is on an NCAA
    committee that is looking into agents and how they operate.
    
    
    Ron
77.2472Can't See University PartYIELD::BARBIERITue Jun 04 1996 20:408
      I can't see how the University shoul dbe penalized, but I can
      sure see the forfeiture of games if Camby was officially 
      inelgible.
    
      I mean...how can any university know if a guy is given a couple
      thousand dollars unless its some kind of gestapo or something?
     
    						Tony
77.2473POWDML::GARBARINOTue Jun 04 1996 20:5414
>    	As far as the sanctions against Syracuse from the "lack of
>    institutional control". The NCAA would have to make a determination
>    that Umass had the same "lack of institutional control". Which IMO
>    would be hard to prove because Calipari himself is on an NCAA
>    committee that is looking into agents and how they operate.

Well, I just can't see how a school is going to go unscathed in this
incident.  You've got a player admitting he took gifts and that it
was against NCAA rules to do so.  Jim Boehiem didn't send $50 checks
to certain players in Christmas cards...he didn't give a player's
parents a low-interest loan on a car purchase...he didn't give HS
recruits on the streets of NYC Syracuse souvenirs, yet the NCAA
somehow determined that he should have had "control" over these
situations.
77.2474Marcus Camby = Cheater = loser!ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jun 05 1996 02:268
    
    Nice to see that UMass made it to the final four the old fashion way..
    
    
    
    They cheated...!  What else is new...  Boston - Losersville USA
    where they dream of winning championships, coke is used like aspirin
    and college players accept cash and gifts illegally.
77.2475CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Jun 05 1996 12:356
  How does taking a necklace from a friend who may have gotten it from an
agent help your team win?

  If he cheated it had nothing to do with the outcome of any game.

  George
77.2476He cheated, Belle didn't... but its okay because Camby is a nice kid?ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Jun 05 1996 12:566
    
    Was it a violation of NCAA rules?  Unlike the Belle situation, this is
    clearly a violation of league rules.  If a college player can obtain
    financial rewards as a college player, he's more easily convinced to
    stay in college for longer.  In this case, Camby probably felt guilty
    and that's why he decided to go pro this year.
77.2477SNAX::ERICKSONWed Jun 05 1996 13:276
    
    	The reporter who wrote the column started his investigation because
    when Marcus declared himself eligible on Apr. 29th, he was wearing
    the Diamond/Gold necklace in question.
    
    Ron 
77.2478he was wearing the freakin necklaceHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Jun 05 1996 13:3714
Among the booty that Camby is accused of taking is a necklace supposedly
worth thousands. Wail, it turns out that ol' Marcus was wearing this same
said neclace at his press conference where he announced he was going pro.

And Ron, I think we're saying close to the same thing about possible
sanctions against UMass. It will be up to the NCAA to come to the
conclusion that there was any lack of institutional control. Of course,
this is not a court of law so such things as evidence and a chance to
hear and respond to your accusers don't come into play.

The NCAA has shown that when they like you they let you slide and when
they don't they come down hard. 

TTom
77.2479Rules, and then laws...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Jun 05 1996 14:168
>     -< He cheated, Belle didn't... but its okay because Camby is a nice >-

    Belle: convicted reckless endangerer;  Camby: alleged fashion plate...
    
    
    glenn
    
77.2480more on CambyHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Jun 05 1996 15:00131
   
   ESPNET SportsZone | Men's College Basketball | NBA
   
                UMASS, NCAA UNEASY WHILE AWAITING CAMBY FALLOUT
   
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   ROSEMONT, Ill. -- Marcus Camby is dodging the media. His agent is
   screaming blackmail. And University of Massachusetts officials are
   praying it's not true.
   
   The Day After after Camby dropped the big bomb has been a hectic one.
   But the fallout is anything but known.
   
   Camby, the consensus national college basketball Player of the Year,
   told a Connecticut newspaper that he accepted cash and gifts from a
   Hartford-based agent while playing for UMass last season.
   
   According to Tuesday's Hartford Courant, Camby accepted cash from one
   agent and jewelry from friends that another agent purchased, all major
   NCAA violations.
   
   Camby said that two friends accepted money, merchandise and rental
   cars from one of the agents during the 1995-96 season.
   
   "I know that's wrong," Camby said from Rosemont, site of the NBA's
   pre-draft testing session. "I really wasn't thinking. The opportunity
   was just there and I took it."
   
   On Tuesday, Camby ducked interviews in Rosemont, Ill., where he took
   his NBA physical. Camby, who is giving up his senior season of NCAA
   eligibility, is expected to be one of the first three players taken in
   the upcoming NBA draft.
   
   Meanwhile, Camby's new agent, James Bryant of Pro Serv, said his
   client never received such benefits and called reports to the contrary
   are false.
   
   "These allegations stem from a failed attempt by an agent to blackmail
   a fine young man to sign with him," Bryant said.
   
   Bryant said Camby did receive $1,000 after the season from an attorney
   but categorically denied that he received anything from any agent or
   representative before then. Bryant added that he and Camby plan to
   meet with Connecticut's state attorney to discuss blackmail charges.
   
   And UMass officials are hoping this all is just a big misunderstanding
   and that the man tutored and coached and watched grow up for three
   years is not involved in anything that would violate NCAA rules.
   
   UMass athletic director Bob Marcum said Tuesday the problem might stem
   from a "disgruntled" agent who wanted to sign the All-America center.
   
   "This represents the relentless pressure and pursuit of certain
   players," he said.
   
   Marcum said UMass officials had no reason to believe Camby was
   accepting improper gifts. However, it is learned that any UMass
   official had knowledge of these alleged rules violations, the school
   could face NCAA probation and the forfeiture of all games Camby played
   in after the violations.
   
   "We've found that in 99.9 percent of these cases, people have operated
   in secret with an agent and institutional personnel are not involved,"
   said David Berst, who oversees the NCAA's enforcement division.
   
   Camby detailed his dealings with agents when questioned by the
   Courant, which obtained documents and information provided by an
   unidentified source.
   
   UMass coach John Calipari defended his program Tuesday but admitted,
   "I don't have a fence around the campus.
   
   "I would hope we taught him better," Calipari added. "Bad judgement,
   absolutely bad judgement. (It was) more like a sting operation. He
   takes the money now, I got him, you don't come with me, I turn it into
   the newspapers.
   
   "Marcus made a bad judgement, but you are talking about a beautiful
   kid who's been an unbelievable role model to so many kids. You have an
   isolated incident of a young man making a bad decision. It's on him
   now, and that's what bothers me, because he is a great kid."
   
   Camby reportedly accepted a diamond necklace worth $3,400 and a linked
   chain valued at $1,800. The jewelry reportedly came through Hartford
   attorney Wesley Spears.
   
   Accepting such inducements from prospective agents is against NCAA
   rules and could result in penalties against UMass, which reached the
   Final Four this season for the first time.
   
   Bryant claims that Camby received money from friends, not knowing that
   it was from Spears.
   
   "Camby accepted $1,000 after the season was over and that's really
   what he told the paper -- the rest was misconstrued," Bryant said.
   "For the last couple of weeks, Marcus has been subject to some threats
   from this other agent (Spears), that if Marcus didn't sign with him
   and come with him for his marketing, then he would expose things like
   this to the press."
   
   Spears' lawyer, Alphonso Tindall Jr., said in Wednesday's editions of
   The New York Times the blackmail charge is "utterly ridiculous and
   false." The lawyer said Camby encouraged his client to become an
   agent, and Spears now intends to sue the player.
   
   Spears has declined comment.
   
   Courant managing editor Cliff Teutsch said Monday night the newspaper
   is standing by its story.
   
   "The facts as reported in our story are correct. The story is based on
   a tape-recorded interview with Mr. Camby," Teutsch said.
   
   The 6-foot-11, 220-pound center has decided to skip his senior year
   and enter the NBA draft.
   
   Camby led Massachusetts to a 35-2 record and its first-ever Final Four
   appearance this season. He swept all the major awards, winning the
   Wooden Award, the Naismith Award and the National Association of
   Basketball Coaches honor as National Player of the Year.
   
   Camby may be the first overall pick and is a likely top three
   selection. He is projected as a power forward in the NBA. Under NBA
   rookie salary cap rules, the first player taken will sign a contract
   worth $9.1 million over three years.
   
   Camby averaged 20.5 points and 8.2 rebounds in 33 games for the
   Minutemen. He became just the fourth player in NCAA history to record
   300 blocked shots by his junior season.
   
77.2481School seems in the clear; Camby was foolishTNPUBS::NAZZAROBest of luck, Marcus!Wed Jun 05 1996 15:2718
    A couple of factual missattements in the ESPN article.  Bryant is not
    Camby's new agent.  He is his first and only agent thus far.  If anyone
    can prove that Spears was his agent during the season, then you'd have
    a story.  No one, not even Spears (or the Boston Globe) has claimed
    that.  
    
    The article as written may have left out the word "if" in discussing
    the potential for punishment against the university.  I believe the
    sentence should have said if UMass knew about the accepting of gifts
    and did nothing about it, then the school could be punished.
    
    I agree with those who say that Camby was an idiot for taking anything
    from an agent, or from friends who served as an agent's intermediary.
    However, there is nothing linking UMass to any of this, and no evidence
    that anyone at UMass knew of these payments.  Seems to me the school is
    in the clear, unless direct evidence comes out implicating the staff.
    
    NAZZ
77.2482EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryWed Jun 05 1996 15:358
    Yeah, Camby has tarnished himself some here.  It's not like he can
    ride the old exploitation angle of poor disadvantaged athlete, either,
    as the necklace wasn't paying to put a roof on Mom's house...
    
    
    glenn
    
77.2483PHHSS1::DFAUSTBad Things, man...Wed Jun 05 1996 15:3712
    
    The entire episode is very much like the Howard Porter/Villanova deal
    around 1970 or so, when Villanova went to the NCAA finals and lost in
    the finals to UCLA. My memory is that Villanova had to firfiet all of
    the proceeds they were to have received from the NCAA and had to
    "forfeit" all games that Porter played in. There were no other
    sanctions (that I recall) against Villanova, because they had no
    knowledge that he had singed with an agent (and taken money from same)
    before the season started.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
77.2484Calipari to da Nets?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorWed Jun 05 1996 16:248
As if'n it couldn't get any worser for UMass what with the Marcus Camby
taking expensive and tacky jewelry, the word on the streets is that the
New Jersey Nets are pursuing Coach Cal for their head coaching job.

Calipari just got through letting ever one know he din't want the Sixers
job.

TTom
77.2485???YIELD::BARBIERIWed Jun 05 1996 20:166
      re: .2476
    
      I'm not sure which is a sadder situation...
    
      The fact that you can talk without your thorazine
      or the fact that you can't with it.
77.2486its okay but, he's one of our Mass buddies...ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 00:482
    
    Camby cheated nuff said.
77.2487Cheated at what?STRATA::BTOWERThu Jun 06 1996 11:2410
    Psst, Grono, Psst. Yes Camby probably did it. It's been goin on for
    years in every major college program. Some get caught some don't. Him takin
    gifts from some agent doesn't have anything to do with wins or losses
    though.
    
    The thing that gets me is why did he even bring it up. I would have
    thought the UMass athletic people would have taught him better. Don't
    do this but if you do keep your mouth shut about it. Who cares if
    somebody gave him a necklace and some cash. What does it matter?
    Zilch in my opinion. 
77.2488spears, extortion, blackmail?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 13:2512
and the woim toins

It looks like the new focus of all this is a_accusation that Spears was
trying to blackmail Camby. At this point, pretty much all the parties
admit that Camby was on the take. Wail, Spears tried to use this to
force Camby to sign on with him as a_agent.

The Police powers that be in Connecticut are actively pursuing this
investigation. Yesterday, they invited Camby to come and tell 'em what he
knows. Camby dummied up when asked about his testimony by the media.

TTom
77.2489MTWAIN::BURROWSRacers Ready...3...2...1...Thu Jun 06 1996 13:2711
>>>    The thing that gets me is why did he even bring it up. I would have
>>>    thought the UMass athletic people would have taught him better. Don't
>>>    do this but if you do keep your mouth shut about it. Who cares if

  My understanding is that the sleazeball agent set Marcus up, tried to 
  blackmail him into signing, and when Marcus signed with another agent, the
  first one tipped off the Hartford paper.  Thus, Marcus was left with no 
  choice but to come clean, or start a string of lies that would be bound 
  to burn him worse than telling the truth.

  CBB 
77.2490EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 06 1996 13:276
    
    So Calipari is pretty certainly to the Nets?
    
    
    glenn
    
77.2491Calapari gone?ODIXIE::ZOGRANAtlanta, Home of the WS ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 13:314
    Calapari(sp) is going to the Nets?  News conference today (according
    to the local FAN station).
    
    UMDan
77.2492even the Ts & CsHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 13:378
Supposedly the deal is done.

Calipari is gonna beat it outta town and sign up big time with the Nets.

In any case, he met with the Nets while in Chicago at the NBA pre-draft
camp.

TTom
77.2493goneHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 13:426
Word just out that a spokebeing from UMass says Calipari is gone. He told
the school this morning and he's gonna join the Nets.

Will Marcus follow? Will Spears follow?

TTom
77.2494ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 13:474
    
    Um... nice slant... but Camby knew the rules, if he took money and
    gifts he's a sleezeball too.  He cheated, plain and simple.
    
77.2495CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 14:186
  On TV today Coach Cal said that if this really was a big deal he would not
leave UMASS but would stay to fight it out with his kids. If he leaves it's
only because he believes this will all amount to nothing.

  George
77.2496WOW !!POWDML::GARBARINOThu Jun 06 1996 14:2915
>Word just out that a spokebeing from UMass says Calipari is gone.

Tough time for UMass.  "Meal-ticket" Marcus leaves early.  Then Camby
porks the University by publicly admitting to taking money while
in school.  Even if UMass is uninvolved, the cloud of an NCAA investi-
gation will hurt.  Calipari, seeing "Meal-ticket" gone and difficult
recruiting ahead, figgers he better BOLT while his stock has peaked.

UMass "officials" gather today:

	"Maybe we better rethink this 'Play Anyone, Anywhere' thing.
	 Get St. Anshelm's, Colby, St. Mark's...on the phone."


And UMass better not tamper with our beloved Bum-hiem.
77.2497POWDML::GARBARINOThu Jun 06 1996 14:325
>  On TV today Coach Cal said that if this really was a big deal he would not
>leave UMASS but would stay to fight it out with his kids. If he leaves it's
>only because he believes this will all amount to nothing.

This guy has a serious political future ahead of him, if he wants it.
77.2498CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 14:344
  What do you mean future? He's in the middle of a serious political career.

  George
77.2499MSBCS::BRYDIEwannabe figure skaterThu Jun 06 1996 15:1715
 >> This guy has a serious political future ahead of him, if he wants it.

    No kidding. If he really meant that pantload he'd have stayed until after
    the NCAA gave its decision. He took the money and ran plain and simple and
    he'd have done it no matter what. Or are we all suppose to believe that if
    the NCAA had levied the death penalty he'd have stuck around? Get real.
    Get serious. Get help. Still, I like coach Cal and I think he's making
    a serious mistake. If he had to take the money and run he should have gone
    to another school because he's no pro coach. He looks at his team as la
    familia and that approach doesn't cut it in the mercenary world of the
    NBA. His rah-rah apprioach will be met with a collective yawn from his 
    players and his job satisfaction level is going to go from sky high to 
    the tar pits. He'll be coaching college ball again within four years.
    
77.2500yeah rightHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 15:2414
>    he'd have done it no matter what. Or are we all suppose to believe that if
>    the NCAA had levied the death penalty he'd have stuck around? Get real.

Definitely reminiscent of the Larry Brown approach. When he found out
that his former team Kansas had received rather serious sanctions, Brown
said that he wouldn't have left if'n he had known that they would be
punished so hard. 

Yeah, right.

The timing on this move couldn't have been worse for UMass and their
fans.

TTom
77.2501CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 15:2413
  On TV they said that he'd be getting $5 million a year for 3 years. Does
that sound right?

  Sounds like a very tempting deal. After 3 years he can go coach college,
highschool, the L.A. Playmate of the month team or what ever he likes and
live like a king off the interest from $15 million.

  And that's if the team goes nowhere. If the team improves while he's there
he can write his ticket anywhere.

  How many people here would turn down a deal like that?

  George
77.2502SNAX::ERICKSONThu Jun 06 1996 15:295
    
    	I heard it was a 5 year 15 Million dollar contract, so only 3
    million a season.
    
    Ron
77.2503just say no to JerseyHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 15:378
I would unless we could work something out that din't require me to be in
New Jersey.

BTW, what is it exactly that Calipari has done that makes him the hot
ticket that he apparently is? Usually, you gotta win something to get
this noteriety.

Of course, it is the Nets...
77.2504CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 16:3614
RE        <<< Note 77.2503 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>

>BTW, what is it exactly that Calipari has done that makes him the hot
>ticket that he apparently is? Usually, you gotta win something to get
>this noteriety.

  I think most owners in the NBA know that one game doesn't prove anything.

  So the 1st time he makes it to the NBA conference final he loses the 1st
game, big deal. He can win the 2nd, even out the series, then take the next 3
out of 5 to win. Something that might have happened in the NCAA tourney but
we'll never know. 

  George
77.2505MSBCS::BRYDIEwannabe figure skaterThu Jun 06 1996 16:4111
    >> I think most owners in the NBA know that one game doesn't 
    >> prove anything.
    
       That's not the question. Why *is* Calipari so intriguing?
       Probably because he's built a great program absolutely from
       scratch. He gets the most out of players that other programs 
       never looked at once nevermind twice. He's a good judge of
       talent and he does his homework. All qualities that make for
       a great college coach but really make him a crapshoot as a 
       pro coach.
77.2506... and we shall seeHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 16:439
Yeah, that's the kinda stuff I was lookin for.

In any case, Coach Cal has been a hot item for quite a while. The
Hornets, among others, had tried, in vain, to recruit him, as did NC
State and a bunch of others.

I guess the supply-demand thing is working big time in his favor...

TTom
77.2507MROA::RSCHOTTThu Jun 06 1996 16:4327
         Calipari's agent was just on WEEI.  The first serious discussion
    with the Nets took place last Friday.  The essentials of the deal were
    in place on Sunday.  He would neither confirm or deny the 5 years @ 
    $3M annually.  Part ownership of the team is not included.  Complete
    charge of the basketball operations is.  Another source called the deal
    "one of the top three NBA Coaching deals presently out there".
    
         What has he done to deserve all this?  Well he took one of the
    worst NCAA Division 1 programs, a program that was averaging 6 or 7
    wins a year all through the 80's, took them over .500 his second year,
    and to 28 wins his fourth year!  In the 90's, he has been the 2nd or
    3rd winningest coach.  And doing all this while seldom attracting 
    "top 10" individual talent to UMass!  There's no question in my mind
    that he has been one of the top five or so college coaches out there
    for the last several years.  Your mileage may vary.
    
         He makes roughly $500K at UMass, with some additional perks that
    push the whole thing somewhat higher.  He will be quadrupling his
    salary.  Though in my opinion the Pioneer Valley is a far superior
    place to bring up a family than is north Jersey, the deal he has landed
    would be tough for any sane person to walk away from!
    
         Though I hate to seem him go, I, and every UMass student, alum and
    fan should wish him nothing but the best, for what he has accomplished.
    
    Russ
        
77.2508ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Jun 06 1996 17:052
    
    Camby = Cheat = makes the final 4 choke look even more significant.
77.2509Remember, it's tough to be an NBA fan if you're a cynicEDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 06 1996 17:0912
> All qualities that make for
> a great college coach but really make him a crapshoot as a 
> pro coach.
    
    Yup.  Nailed it right on the head.  But let's not forget that 
    Jersey needs to sell tickets and right now Calipari is the #1
    young hotshot coach out there.  All of which is good for maybe 
    one season's worth of satisfaction if'n the W's don't show up.
    
    glenn
    
77.2510CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 17:108
  Well crap shoot or no if you're the Nets what do you have to lose?

  As for living in New Jersey, if he has a family he can afford to live in the
best neighborhood, commute in a limo, and his kids can go to private schools.

  Looks like a reasonable risk for both sides.

  George
77.2511EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryThu Jun 06 1996 17:1211
    
>  Well crap shoot or no if you're the Nets what do you have to lose?
    
    A lot more games and $15M?
    
    To re-phrase the question, what does anyone have to lose in a 
    sporting venture (I know, I know, you've offered that philosophy
    many times yourself)?
    
    glenn
    
77.2512CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsThu Jun 06 1996 17:1912
  I don't think it's the risk you claim it is. Coach Cal has always struck me
as a real savvy guy who can handle just about anything. The guy's so slick it's
amazing his pants don't fall off. He should fit right in down around Jersey and
the big apple and with his monetary outlook he should fit right into the NBA
and should have no problem understanding NBA players.

  I see this as a big chance for the Nets to go somewhere. I just wish the
Celtics could have gotten him instead. Problem is, since he never played for
the Celtics they wouldn't even give him a 2nd look never mind giving him
control of the program.

  George
77.2513wood that you couldHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 17:203
I've sported various things afore but never a venture...

TTom
77.2514POWDML::GARBARINOThu Jun 06 1996 17:2428
>         Though I hate to seem him go, I, and every UMass student, alum and
>    fan should wish him nothing but the best, for what he has accomplished.

You're right Russ.  His accomplishments are very significant, considering
where the program was before he came.  The key question now is:

	"Was Calipari *the program* ?"

Did his short stint of success at a previous non-entity in college
basketball build a *major* program identity that will live on after
his departure ?


re:  his decision

There's no way he can turn down that deal.  His value could grow if
he takes next year's much less talented team and gets deep into the
tournament.  But that's a big risk.  Why take that risk when he's
already getting HUGE bucks from NJ now ??

We don't know Calipari's personal goals in life, but all of us would
like to be financially secure/independent.  He ain't gonna get there
with the money UMass can pay him.  He's well on his way there now.

And while I agree with some of the arguments on Calipari's coaching
strengths, in the NBA "image is everything", as Agassi says.  Calipari
and Pitino are two of the best pitch-men in sports, and that's no small
factor when an NBA owner wants to sell tickets.
77.2515greater love hath no manMKOTS3::BREENThu Jun 06 1996 19:595
    Well we could see it coming from Pitino's comments about Calipari's
    potential as a pro coach (March) to the charade of Rick "examining" the
    NJ job and actually setting up his buddy.  The question in my mind
    while this was going on was "How is Cal'pari going to slip Camby thru
    the draft?"  I don't know, what slot does NJ pick from?
77.2516recruit questionsWRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatThu Jun 06 1996 20:0513
Does Calipari's decision to leave allow UMass's recruits for next year to
reneg on their commitment (without losing any eligibility or having to sit
out a year) ??

I certainly hope that Calipari hasn't "promised" these new kids he'd be
around for their 4 years (like he supposedly did with Camby).

UMass's program will definately suffer without Calipari (he was the *Program*).
While they certainly won't be as bad as they were before his arrival, they will
be hard pressed to repeat (or come close to) his success.

Chris
77.2517better trade upHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 20:081
New Jersey has the #8 pick, at which time ol' Marcus will be long gone.
77.2518CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westThu Jun 06 1996 20:3517
    >We don't know Calipari's personal goals in life, but all of us would
    >like to be financially secure/independent.  He ain't gonna get there
    >with the money UMass can pay him.  He's well on his way there now.
    
    This is a joke right?
    
    6% interest compounded monthly on $500,000 is $30,838.91 in the first
    year.  I know families that are happy to see $30,000 a year.  If he
    can't become financially secure with a $500,000/yr salary, he is
    stupid.
    
    Now if you mean he can't own the $10,000,000 house, the $60,000 car,
    the summer home in Bermuda, etc...then you might have an argument, but
    you can't use the financially secure arguement.
    
    Marc
    
77.2519IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Jun 06 1996 20:3515
>    The question in my mind
>    while this was going on was "How is Cal'pari going to slip Camby thru
>    the draft?" 

As long as we're into conspiracy theories...

...I know, I know...

Camby's collapse was a fake, designed to knock down his draft position some.
Calipari had the contract in his hand!  Yeah, I saw it...

Yeah, that's the ticket...

No Marcus for Calipari unless the Nets trade up.  And what do they have to
make a squad give up that kind of pick?
77.2520MSBCS::BRYDIEwannabe figure skaterThu Jun 06 1996 20:399
  
     >> 6% interest compounded monthly on $500,000 
    
        And $500,000 was just his *base*. He had clauses in his contract
        (from my faulty memory) that gave him the school's share of revenue
        from a couple of away games of his choice. He had the tv show, the 
        store in Amherst, personal appearances, etc. I don't blame him for
        taking the Jersey deal but he didn't do it because his kids' stomachs
        were growling.
77.2521Armon Gilliam aint gonna get it doneHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 20:425
>No Marcus for Calipari unless the Nets trade up.  And what do they have to
>make a squad give up that kind of pick?

The best they have for trades is Chris Childs at the point. And then
there's always Kendall Gill...
77.2522Holmes: "You may find my methods unusual but they did result in the finding of the jewels"MKOTS3::BREENThu Jun 06 1996 21:339
    Who mentioned a conspiracy theory.  When one theorizes that something
    might happen and then it happens is it still a theory in hindsite?  My
    point was that all along I thought Calipari wanted to coach a pro team
    with Camby on it.
    
    I'm pointing out that for the second part of that I don't have a theory
    right now.  The Nets have Bradley, big deal you say?  Also, who did
    they get for Anderson from the bugs?  Bradley back to the 6ers for a
    swap of draft choices and next years #1?
77.2523Gill and ReevesHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorThu Jun 06 1996 21:394
The Nets got Kendall Gill and Khalid Reeves for Anderson who they're
gonna let go of anyway.

Hail,the bugs'll take ol' Bradley, straight up for LJ...
77.2524SICK OF THIS GUYFABSIX::R_LUCHTNo sleep till.......Fri Jun 07 1996 03:438
Hey Groanowski,
		Why don't you keep your ignorant midwest comments out of these
Massachusettes notes. Camby and Calipari certainly aren't losers. Just because
your college teams like Cinncinnati can't cut it, don't tear down our program
over an unproven minor incident involving dirty agents. Calipari and Camby both
make it big.

						Rich.........
77.2525ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 07 1996 11:132
    
    Camby Cheated.
77.2526ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 07 1996 11:145
    
    Its all too convenient for you kunckleheads to blame the agents.  Are
    they agents sleezy?  Yes.  Does that make what Camby did right?  NO.
    
    Plain and simple he cheated.
77.2527ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 07 1996 11:142
    
    test
77.2528ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 07 1996 11:142
    
    Anyone have any new news on Camby?
77.2529ROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 07 1996 11:153
    
    Latest rumor is that someone has stepped forward and claimed Camby
    cheated in school as well.
77.2531looks like the whole town is full of losers and cheatsROCK::GRONOWSKIFri Jun 07 1996 11:177
    
    Hey Lusch, if you don't like it, don't read it.  Sorry that everyone
    can't share your opinion, and that you can't handle and opposing
    opinion.
    
    p.s. How are the Sox doing...
    
77.2532CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsFri Jun 07 1996 12:1717
  The WBZ financial analyst this morning said the thing that Camby and Coach
Cal had in common was someone waving a lot of money under their nose. His
solution was that the NBA should develop a real minor league system that
allowed kids not interested in college to go pro right out of highschool. 

  It works for baseball, why not basketball? It might be fun if 30 smaller
cities had minor league programs and it might improve the quality of NBA
basketball if injured players could be replaced by calling up someone who had
been playing in the minors all season. 

  With regard to a question someone asked earlier the Globe said that the
highschool kids that had signed with UMASS would have to choose between going
to UMASS anyway or going to a junior or community college and sitting out a
couple years. However the UMASS players who were interviewed by WBZ all seemed
to support Coach Cal's moves. As one player said, "that's life, you move on". 

  George
77.2533Any chance of Detroit trading Lou Roe to NJ?TNPUBS::NAZZAROBest of luck, Marcus!Fri Jun 07 1996 13:2426
    Couple of factoids:
    
    1) Calipari's base salary at UMass was $132,000.  He had lots of perks
    worked into the deal, including obtaining the net revenues from one
    neutral site game per year, the shoe, car, clothes, and camp deals,
    that pushed his annual take close to $750,000, but the Massachusetts
    taxpayer was directly liable for only $132,000. 
    
    2) UMass won five more games last year than the Nets!
    
    I am very happy for Calipari.  He obviously made the right decision in
    spurning the Sixers and taking the Nets job.  New Jersey has a nice
    base group of young players.  I predict Calipari will get them an extra
    15 wins next year and a spot in the playoffs.
    
    As for UMass, here's hoping they make short work of the search process
    to replace Coach Cal and hire Bruiser Flint.  Bruiser has earned the
    right to succeed Calipari, based on his seven years as an assistant.
    And he is a very knowledgable basketball man, though obviously not as
    slick as Cal.  And the team has what one publication called the 5th
    best recruiting class in the country, in addition to the eligibility of
    6-10 279 lb Lari Ketner, who sat out last year due to Prop 48.  I
    expect UMass to again be a Top 20 team next year, with another A-10
    title and a trip to the Sweet Sixteen.
    
    NAZZ
77.2534open paper, readHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 07 1996 13:4414
re: minor leagues

There already are a couple of these. The de facto one is the CBA which
regularly contributes players and coaches to the NBA. There's a USBL
which we've discussed and prolly some others. There's Europe, too.

But the best young talent goes NCAA cause that system works fine for
them. All this talk of oppression, ripping the athletes off and paying
'em does not change the fack that the current college system works real
good for the better players.

Besides, college apparently pays better'n the minors....

TTom
77.2535SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jun 07 1996 13:4911
    
    	Coach Cal, had a 193-71 record at Umass taking over a team that
    had 10 straight losing seasons, Taking Umass to 2 NIT and 5 NCAA
    tournaments.
    	As for this years recruits, since they signed a letter of intent
    they are obligated to attend Umass. If the choose not to attend Umass
    there are various options, these options would cost them 1 or 2 years
    of eligibility.
    
    
    Ron
77.2536POWDML::GARBARINOFri Jun 07 1996 14:1823
>    	As for this years recruits, since they signed a letter of intent
>    they are obligated to attend Umass. If the choose not to attend Umass
>    there are various options, these options would cost them 1 or 2 years
>    of eligibility.

I don't believe this is true.  Just last week a HS recruit who committed
to Manhattan was granted his release so he could follow Fraschilla to
St. John's.  The report said he is eligible to play next year.  This
may have something to do with his *following* the recruiting coach
to his new school, I don't know.

When Tarkanian The Criminal left UNLV, after getting himself and UNLV
whacked by the NCAA, two recruits (Shon Tarver, Ed O'Bannon) were allowed
to transfer (UCLA) and play immediately.  This may have been due to the
NCAA penalties.  Again, I don't know.

Right now a Syracuse recruit is trying to get out of his commitment
so he can go to UCLA.  This is a clear violation of the letter of
intent rules, and he's supposed to sit out the next two years.  BUT,
there's an *appeal* process which could allow him to play this year
if the NCAA so decides.

So, as with just about everything in life, nothing is black-and-white.
77.2537POWDML::GARBARINOFri Jun 07 1996 14:2516
>    As for UMass, 
>    expect UMass to again be a Top 20 team next year, with another A-10
>    title and a trip to the Sweet Sixteen.

I'm happy for you that you're such an optimist amid all this turmoil,
Nazz.  I admire that, since I always try to look for the *silver lining*
myself.  But I believe these were close to your expectations before
Calipari bolted.  If he means 15 wins to the Nets, I gotta believe
'x' W's are leaving the UMass program (can Flint be that good, given
no one plucked him from Calipari's bench all these years ?).  I don't
see them winning the A-10 (aren't Temple and RI returning most of their
kids ?) or being a Top20.  I they'll be lucky to make the NCAA tournament,
and a Sweet-16 is very improbable.

But hey, what do I know ?  I was hoping SU would just get in to the
tournament and win it's 1st-round game.
77.2538POWDML::GARBARINOFri Jun 07 1996 14:4622
>    This is a joke right?
    
>    6% interest compounded monthly on $500,000 is $30,838.91 in the first
>    year.  I know families that are happy to see $30,000 a year.

I'm sure Coach Cal doesn't want to rent or live in a trailer park the
rest of his life...  :^)


I'll admit that I didn't get my bank calculator out before I said that.
And maybe I have a different idea of *financial independence*, but I still
think his 5-year guaranteed contract would make him financially independent
and his contract at UMass over the same period would NOT.  I'm talking
about the rest of his life's financial needs.

Like I said, what are his goals ?  A real nice house in a nice neighborhood
will cost him half a Mil (min).  IMO, if you have the dough, private schools
are the obvious choice, from K-college.  Helping your kids get their
families started is something most parents would love to provide.
Making sure there's plenty of money for retirement.  Having enough
liquidity to take advantage of *big* investment opportunities, further
securing your future.
77.2539CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westFri Jun 07 1996 16:1426
    
    Okay, let's try this again.  I have no factual numbers, but concensus
    seems to be that all his assests equal about $750,000 a year.  For the
    sake of argument, I'll lower that figure to $400,000 a year for each of
    the last 8 years at UMASS.  This is 3.2 *MILLION* dollars.  In his
    first year (of the 8) he buys a $300,000 dollar house in a nice
    neighborhood, three cars for the family totaling $120,000, and starts
    to look at his future.  Let's suppose that he has been living on ONLY
    $75,000 per year for the other fun stuff.  
    
    This means that $1,020,000 of his $3,200,000 are already allocated. 
    This leaves him with ONLY $2,180,000 (from the 8 years already, never
    mind future seasons) to live on.
    
    I'm 27 years old, if you give me $2,180,000, I guarentee that I will
    OWN a house, car, etc... and be bill free (aside from maintainence
    stuff like electricity) for the rest of my life and never have to work
    again.
    
    That much money at his age should be more than enough to be financially
    secure for the rest of his life.  However, you said it yourself:  He'll
    want the $1,000,000 house instead of the $300,000 house or something
    else.
    
    Marc
    
77.2540do I hear a mil?HBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jun 07 1996 16:248
>    I'm 27 years old, if you give me $2,180,000, I guarentee that I will

Hail, I'll settle for a mil and a half. Give me a mil and a half and you
won't hear from me again.

Let the bidding begin...

TTom
77.2541Guess Who ?IAMOK::BARRYFri Jun 07 1996 16:5639
    
    
    I had to dig back long and hard to find these quotes, but let me know
    if anyone can guess who is being referred to here:
    
    "He did what he wanted to do and said the hell with everyone else..."
    
    "The man cares about one thing, his ego and using (sports) to satisfy
    it..."
    
    "This is an incredibly classless act by a man who is only motivated by
    seeing how big he can inflate his ego..."
    
    "The school should be glad to be rid of him and should look for a coach
    that will bring some integrity to the program..."
    
    
    
    Give up ? I got these from notes 144.141 and 144.79....
    
    
    
    Are these the rantings of a UMass Alum in righteous indignation at:
    
    		a. Camby stiffing his school, team mates and coach by
    		   cheating with an agent ?
    
    		b. Calipari stiffing recruits and taking off to follow the
    		   bucks ?
    
    		c. Calipari's handling of the "academic" side of his
    		   responsibilities ?
    
    Nope. These are from the time that Tom Coughlin left BC. The rantings
    are, however, those of a UMass Alum. 
    
    When is a greedhead not a greedhead? Apparently, when he stiffs UMass.
    
    
77.2542PECAD8::CHILDSFri Jun 07 1996 17:053
Marc you've unamerican which is probably a copliment but the rest of rats
are going for the dough!!!
77.2543POWDML::GARBARINOFri Jun 07 1996 17:174
>    seems to be that all his assests equal about $750,000 a year.  For the
>    sake of argument, I'll lower that figure to $400,000 a year for each of

Remember Uncle Sam's take...
77.2544SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jun 07 1996 17:296
    
    	Calipari was making next to nothing in terms of salary his first
    5 or 6 years at Umass. He signed his big 10 year contract last season.
    So he hasn't averaged close to 400K over the last 8 years.
    
    Ron
77.2545Summary Thought: UMass Lacks What Others HaveSTRATA::BARBIERISun Jun 09 1996 12:5426
      Ultimately, my thoughts are respective of my allegiance to 
      UMass and not Calipari (though I wish him well).
    
      In the back of my mind, my biggest wish for UMass was that
      they would be like...
    
      Indiana
      North Carolina
      Duke
      UCLA (60's/70's)
      Kansas (perhaps)
      Cincinnatti (perhaps)
      Georgetown
    
      We can argue North Carolina and Georgetown, but you get the point.
      A school that not only has a fine coach, but one that (for whatever
      the reason) is *content* where he is and can stay forever.
    
      Duke really is one lucky school that way!
    
      So UMass doesn't have that same fortune.
    
      Maybe this Flint guy will be OK.  I hear he coached the guards.  If
      their success was largely attributed to him, I have hope!
    
    							Tony
77.2546SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jun 10 1996 13:498
    
    	With Bruiser Flint getting the head coaching job at Umass, all
    the new recruits are more at ease and should attend Umass in the Fall.
    Flint did most of the early recruiting, while Calipari closed the
    deals.
    
    
    Ron
77.2547POWDML::GARBARINOMon Jun 10 1996 19:099
>    	With Bruiser Flint getting the head coaching job at Umass, all
>    the new recruits are more at ease and should attend Umass in the Fall.

The school did the right thing, for the short-term.  The assistants
generally do MOST of the recruiting, so UMass' incoming freshmen
know "Bruiser" better than Calipari anyway.

The long-term will be determined by Flint's coaching ability, or
lack thereof.
77.2548Bruiser was the right choice at the right timeTNPUBS::NAZZAROBest of luck, Marcus!Mon Jun 10 1996 19:1619
    Re. -1:  This is 100% accurate.  Signing Bruiser was definitely the
    right thing to do, as keeping happy and intact one of the top five
    recruiting classes in the country had to be a top priority at UMass,
    given the incredibly difficult schedule they face this fall.  
    
    I have always been favorably impressed by Bruiser, ever since he was a
    player at St. Joe's.  He played like his nickname, even if he was only
    5-10.  I suspect Travieso and Padilla owe much of thier success tohis
    tutelage.
    
    However, Bruiser must prove he can coach an entire team, not just the
    guards.  He has to prove he can handle the responsiblity that goes
    along with one of the top programs in the country.  He seems ready, but
    only time will tell.  And not just one year.  I hope for another A-10
    title and a 20-win season next year, but it will be how UMass does for
    the next 3-4 years that will determine if Bruiser was the right man for
    the job.
    
    NAZZ
77.2549SNAX::ERICKSONMon Jun 10 1996 19:416
    
    	Calipari asked Bruiser if he was ready to be a head coach, Bruiser
    said yes and Calipari agreed with him. If Bruiser didn't get the
    head coaching job at Umass, he was going with Cal to New Jersey.
    
    Ron
77.2550losing a recruit ?SALEM::BALL_KFri Jun 21 1996 11:174
    Does anyone have any more information on the Globe rumor about Basit 
    wanting to back out of his agreement to play next year ?
    
    
77.2551adios AjmalMROA::RSCHOTTFri Jun 21 1996 12:1513
         The only thing that I have heard is that Bob Hurley Sr. (Basit's
    coach) was never too keen on Basit coming to Amherst.  Evidently he and 
    Calipari, Robic and Flint didn't hit it off.  Basit has sent a FAX to 
    UMass asking to be released from his letter.  AD Bob Marcum is talking 
    tough at the moment.  Hurley is saying that if UMass won't release him 
    from his commitment, Basit will attend prep school next year, and then go 
    elsewhere (Seton Hall?) the year after.
    
         I'd have Flint fly down and visit with Basit immediately.  If his
    mind is made up, I'd cut him loose.
    
    Russ
              
77.2552SNAX::ERICKSONFri Jun 21 1996 16:066
     	
    	Bob Hurley has refused to released Basits grades/transcipts to
    Umass. So Umass doesn't even know if he qualifies academically to
    be accepted to the school. 
    
    Ron
77.2553IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanFri Jun 21 1996 16:547
>    	Bob Hurley has refused to released Basits grades/transcipts to
>    Umass. So Umass doesn't even know if he qualifies academically to
>    be accepted to the school. 


Wow!  Since when does the basketball coach have control over grades and
transcripts?  Talk about a guy on a power trip.
77.2554AbsurdYIELD::BARBIERISun Jun 23 1996 14:099
    re: -1
    
    Same thought I had.  Regardless of the guy's feelings about UMass
    and Calipari, they are irrelevent as his right to withold anything
    like that.
    
    Ridiculous.
    
    						Tony
77.2555PECAD8::CHILDSMon Jun 24 1996 10:577
 Geez if Calipari had to sneak to depths of scalping tickets to make ends meet
 it's no wonder he took the New Jersey job.......

 we all know John Thompson bets the other team.........

 ;^)
77.2556Shootout reportTNPUBS::NAZZAROAin't no one gonna dog me downMon Jun 24 1996 15:5828
    What I heard over the weekend about Hurley was that he wants the Seton
    Hall head coaching job, and figures Blaney will get fired either at the
    end of this season or the next.  SO he wants to direct as many local
    New Jersey players as possible to the Hall.  That's why he refused to
    allow Basit to declare early during the November signing period to
    UMass (when Basit wanted to commit) and why he's holding up his grades
    now.
    
    As for Basit, he appeared to be a typical pouting, loud-mouth superstar
    in waiting during the Shootout this weekend.  He sulked, yelled at his
    coach, trash-talked non-stop, and showed that he can hustle, block
    shots, and rebound when he wants to.  His offensive game needs some
    work.  
    
    Winston SMith looked very smooth, despite the fact that he didn't shoot
    very well.  He was an aggressive defender, and rebounded well for his
    size.  The two Boston players going to UMass played very well, with
    Mike Babul averaging around 15 ppg, and MOnte Mack being named MVP
    after a terrific 32 point performance in the championship game.  He
    everaged 26 ppg for the three games, and stepped up down the stretch
    with key baskets and two big steals wehn Boston needed it most.
    
    Boston's win was even more impressive considering that underclassmen
    Mike Bradley, Jonathan DePina, Elton Tyler, and Scott Clark were all in
    Princeton NJ for some kind of camp/educational thing.  ALl four could
    have started for Boston.
    
    NAZZ
77.2557MKOTS3::BREENMon Jun 24 1996 16:0212
    I don't think Hurley is witholding without the student's request.  This
    sounds like a loophole in the Letter of Intent bylaw.  While the grades
    are "in transit" the scholarship is in limbo and Hurley is hoping that
    this stagnation will give the kid leverage.
    
    I although I don't doubt that consideration is given by the ncaa to the
    basic good for High School and college students it's not a main
    priority.  Those are:  Money, Coaches Egos, Internal Administration
    Politics, Money...  Since High School athletes are never represented in
    any kind of bargaining process with the ncaa their adherence to any
    rules is not morally justified.  Eg, Camby had every right to accept
    expense money.
77.2558MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Mon Jun 24 1996 16:157
    
      Hurley *could* just be looking out for his kid's best interest.
     Cal jumped ship like many figured he would when he goa a better
     offer. Then the Camby thing which could result in NCAA sanctions.
     And now, reports surface of Cal's ties to ticket scalpers and
     low level Mafia types. Hurley just might be doing the right 
     thing. 
77.2559IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Jun 24 1996 16:303
>Hurley just might be doing the right thing. 

Perhaps, but my question is:  how does he have the right to do it at all?
77.2560not connectedHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorMon Jun 24 1996 16:401
Maybe Hurley is just mad cause Calipari din't give him no tickets...
77.2561Basit Is Going To UMassYIELD::BARBIERIWed Jul 03 1996 16:0623
    From today's Boston Globe:
    
    "University of Massachusetts basketball recruits Ajmal Basit
     and Monty Mack have told coach James (Bruiser) Flint they 
     will honor their commitments and enroll in the school this 
     fall, although Mack's eligibility is in doubt."
    
     later in same article:
    
    "Basit, a 6-10 center from St. Anthony's in Jersey City, N.J.,
     signed a letter of intent last winter but had second thoughts
     when John Calipari left to become coach and director of 
     basketball operations for the New Jersey Nets.  Calipari was
     the deciding factor in Basit's initial decision to attend
     UMass and Flint understood his dilemma.
     Basit, whose only other option was to attend prep school, 
     informed Flint last week he was coming.
     'The kid never said he wasn't coming to UMass,' said Flint.  
     'He was thinking about his options and I told him I would give 
     him all the time he needed.  I wanted him to be comfortable 
     with the decision.  If he didn't want to be here I didn't want 
     him because this is my first year and I don't need any problems.'"
                
77.2562Mack having quite a summer!WMOIS::SCHOTTWed Jul 03 1996 16:2217
         I thought the most impressive tidbit from the article was the
    fact that Monty Mack has been named the MVP of BOTH the Boston
    Shootout and the National Junior AAU Tourney, two of the nation's
    most prestigious tournaments, this summer.  The Shootout attracted
    some to the biggest name H.S. guards in the country, players such as
    Shaheen Holloway, Ronnie Fields and Shea Cotton, and for Mack to be
    named MVP is quite an honor.
    
         Mack was rated no better than about the 75th best high school'er
    in the various recruiting rags that I looked at, and the Prepstars
    Service had him at 172.  Looks like UMass has located another "diamond
    in the rough"!  Hopefully he can get his eligibility straightened out,
    and join with Edgar Padilla, Carmello Travieso, and Charlton Clarke in
    forming one of college basketball's best backcourts, next season.
    
    Russ
        
77.2563MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Wed Jul 03 1996 16:4212
  >> fact that Monty Mack has been named the MVP of BOTH the Boston
  >> Shootout and the National Junior AAU Tourney, 
    
     I saw that. Pretty impressive. Equally impressive is the fact
     that Boston has won the National Junior AAU Tourney back to
     back. Not bad for an area not widely considered a basketball
     hotbed. I didn't like the way Mack wouldn't reveal how he did
     on his SATs though. You'd tend to think that if he passed, he'd
     say so. I think he won't be playing next year which is too bad
     because he and Clarke could step in right after Padilla and
     Traveiso graduate and not miss a beat.
    
77.2564Yes, Big News About MackYIELD::BARBIERIMon Jul 08 1996 14:308
      Yeah, I saw that as BIG about Monty Mack, but also having
      that 6'10" Basit state he's going to UMass when it seemed
      he might not is huge as well.
    
      Sure hope Mack makes the freshmen eligibility.  That would
      make for a much smoother transition from Padilla/Traveiso.
    
    						Tony
77.2565SNAX::ERICKSONThu Jul 18 1996 15:5617
    
    	Nice article in the Boston Globe today about Calipari and the
    "Refuse to Lose" slogan. Commercial Cal was awarded a US Trademark
    for the slogan, So if you want to use it you have to pay for it.
    In 1990 Coach Cal got the slogan from the Umass football team, the original
    purpose of the slogan, was for ANY Umass team to use the slogan, not
    an individual to make money off of it. Others have filed for the
    trademark before, but were not awarded the trademark because they
    didn't have the funds to market the slogan. Umass believes that
    Calipari will continue to let Umass use the slogan, free of charge.
    Calipari did donate 20K to the Umass library from the money he has
    gotten from "Refuse to Lose", which is estimated at 100K per month
    or 1.2 million a year.
    	Tell me he didn't go to New Jersey for the money...
    
    
    Ron
77.2566So what? Where the story?TNPUBS::NAZZAROAin't no one gonna dog me downThu Jul 18 1996 19:208
    Yet another non-article by the man with a grudge against UMass, Dan
    Golden.  How and why the Globe lets this guy's garbage reach the paper
    at all, never mind the front page, is a mystery.  All the lengthy
    article stated (non of which was anywhere near new news) was that Coach
    Cal invested money, hired a lawyer and TM'ed "Refuse To Lose".  And now
    he's making money off it, 20% of which he donated to the library.
    
    NAZZ
77.2567IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanThu Jul 18 1996 19:295
>    Yet another non-article by the man with a grudge against UMass, Dan
>    Golden.  How and why the Globe lets this guy's garbage reach the paper
>    at all, never mind the front page, is a mystery.

If he wrote it about any other school, it'd be OK, though.
77.2568Ridiculous to give coverage to the story, especially font pageTNPUBS::NAZZAROAin't no one gonna dog me downThu Jul 18 1996 19:428
    No, the point is, he wouldn't have wrote it about any other school, and
    the Globe wouldn't have published it.  Calipari applied for the TM for
    "Refuse to Lose" over two years ago.  Why wasn't it a front page story
    then?  What makes it worthy of a front page story at any time, but even
    moreso now that Calipari isn't at UMass any longer?
    
    NAZZ
    
77.2569MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Jul 19 1996 13:5710
    
      All last season when the Globe posted positive article after 
     postive article about UMass and every single member of the 
     starting five and Coac Cal and Bruiser Flint as well, we heard 
     nary a peep from the po' po' victimized UMass fans. But let the 
     Globe print one truthful article about Coach Cal's unabashed 
     greed (which btw is why he ain't at UMass anymore) and the
     woe-is-me crowd comes right out of the woodwork. It was a
     sleazeball move by Cal and everyone knows it as they deserved
     to.
77.2570Thank you John, you were marvelous; btw put back the silverMKOTS3::BREENFri Jul 19 1996 14:4014
    It's taken for granted that Calipari will waive the trademark for
    UMass.  He actually bought out another, non UMass user/applier to get
    the trademark which is issued for purposes of making money off the
    trademark.
    
    Nazz is right in it not being a story perse except for the salient
    point that it's a story because readers of the Glove are surely
    interested.  "Greed" is a joke word in sports today as it is in
    business.  Personally I wouldn't trust Calipari to run my bank but
    would hire him to coach my basketball team any time.
    
    As a college basketball fan from the 50s, John Calipari has done more
    for basketball in Massachusetts, real basketball I'm talking about,
    than any individual since Mullaney.
77.2571I agree with you about the sports coverage - this isn't sportsTNPUBS::NAZZAROAin't no one gonna dog me downFri Jul 19 1996 15:3712
    Tommy, I have absolutely no beef at all with the Globe Sports
    department.  It is the powers that be on Morrissey Blvd. and Dan Golden
    who are getting to me.  Bob Ryan, BC grad that he is, had the guts to
    call the Marcus Camby coverage a disgrace and said the the sports
    department knew the disbursement of the Final Four tickets was no
    story at all, but people higher up were determined to make it one.  On
    Sports Final, Ryan said that it was about time for the rest of the
    paper to do what they do best and leave the Sports reporting to the
    people that cover sports, because the non-sports people obviously don't
    have a clue about what is meaningful in sports.
    
    NAZZ
77.2572MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Jul 19 1996 16:0010
    
      Oh, never mind.
    
      Bear in mind, Nazz that we don'tive in a big time college
      sports area. Before Coach Cal and UMass garnered the national 
      spotlight - BC got deep in the NCAAs once or twice, there was 
      Flutie and BC football back in the '80s and you'd have to go 
      back pretty far before that. What might be blase to folks in
      other parts of the country is news in these here parts.
    
77.2573BC's ncaa fame in my day; want NIT?MKOTS3::BREENFri Jul 19 1996 20:3520
    From memory:
    
    	1968 - Loss to up and coming, hustling coach Dean Smith in round of 8
    
    	1975 - Loss to Kansas st. and ? Evans in qfinal
    
    	1981 - Loss to Houston in round of 8 - Cougars had some Nigerian frosh
    	
    	198? - Loss to Virginia and Ralph Sampson; comeback stymied (rd of 8)
    
    	198? - Loss to Memphis st on Barry turnover in qfinal; Barry never 
    		returns to Nashua but sisters make stir in woman's ball
    
    	1993	Loss to Florida in round of 8 after knocking of Dean and
    		Bobby all called by elderly noter
    
    ?1	84?
    ?2	87?
    
    btw - That wasn't Rick Barry not Dave
77.2574MKOTS3::BREENFri Jul 19 1996 20:406
    The missing years were 1983 and 1985.  If BC had slipped past Samson
    they'd have had a run at the eventual champ NC St and might have
    whipped them and Valvano would still be hugless.
    
    They had a better shot in 1985 and could have made it an all Big East
    final.
77.2575between then and nowHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jul 19 1996 20:508
>The missing years were 1983 and 1985.

Mine are between 1967 and, uh, when it is now?

I do remember State beating Ralph. I was at the ACC tournament game and
watched the Western Regional finals. Poor ol' Ralph was never the same.

TTom
77.2576MKOTS3::BREENFri Jul 19 1996 20:527
    >Mine are between 1967 and, uh, when it is now?
    
    How'd you last that long?
    
    > Poor ol' Ralph was never the same.
    
    The "same" was nothing to shout about
77.2577directionHBAHBA::HAASmore madness, less horrorFri Jul 19 1996 20:5710
My life took a serious turn about 1967. Up till then I had no clue about
anything but din't know it. I guess I woke up and realized the crock I'd
been fed.

I'm still trying to find a_identity.

As a collegiate Sampson was pretty good, although with the help of Terry
Holland managed to underachieve nonetheless.

TTom
77.2578Carmello/Edgar in AtlantaWMOIS::SCHOTTMon Jul 22 1996 18:5416
         It was nice to see NBC focus in on Carmello Travieso and Edgar
    Padilla as members of the Puerto Rico Olympic Team, during the Parade
    of Nations during the Opening Ceremonies of the Olympics.  Both were
    born in Puerto Rico (on the very same day coincidentally enough), but
    moved to Massachusetts around the age of 10 or so.
    
         From what I have read, Padilla was pretty much a sure thing to
    make the Olympic Team, given that his summer league coach also coaches
    the National Team, and that Edgar played on the National Team last 
    summer.  Carmello was a long shot, and was only informed
    of his selection in the final weeks leading up to the Olympics.  The
    U.S. doesn't play P.R. in the prelims, so we probably won't see Edgar
    and Carmello on TV, unless Puerto Rico makes the medal round.
    
    Russ
                         
77.2579Clarke also having a good summer!WMOIS::SCHOTTFri Jul 26 1996 17:2715
         During the month of June, sophomore-to-be Charlton Clarke
    participated on an All-Star team of athletes from ACC and Big East
    schools, among others, touring Italy.  Clarke was named MVP of the U.S.
    team, as he led them to an 8 and 1 record, averaging 22 ppg, 7 rpg and
    5 apg!
    
         With Padilla and Travieso as givens, and a rapidly improving
    Charlton Clarke, UMass is going to have a very fine back court next
    season.  Now .... if Weeks can stay healthy, if Ketner is half as good
    as advertised, and if one or two of the freshmen prove to be PLAYERS,
    Bruiser Flint will have a pretty decent team to put on the floor!
    
         Here's hoping.
    
    Russ                                        
77.2580UMASS newsAKOCOA::TROYThu Aug 01 1996 12:3811
    
    I saw in the UMass Chronicle that Mr. Mack is not eligible to play - he
    missed the minimum SAT by 10 points or something. Apparently he can
    practice with the team  - the term Proposition 48 was NOT used, so I
    wonder what his exact NCAA status is.
    
    Also, Camby has apparently admitted taking gifts before the season
    started, according to the Globe this am.  Really disappointing that he
    could potentially sour the whole season post-facto - imagine the horror
    if UMASS had won 2 more games.  Say what you will  - Ethics are not
    something just for adults.  
77.2581Excellent!YIELD::BARBIERITue Aug 06 1996 19:265
    re: .2579
    
    Very good news!  Looks like we'll have quite the guard tandem.
    
    						Tony
77.2582PECAD8::CHILDSWed Aug 07 1996 11:319
 So who gets the UNC job when it comes up? Roy or Johnny Slick??? You know in
 a few years after he makes his millions he'll be back in the college game....

 Is it official yet did they forfeit the season? That certainly would be 
 so like the state.........


 mike
77.2583From a UMass perspectiveTNPUBS::NAZZAROAin't no one gonna dog me downFri Aug 16 1996 13:2926
    I thought I'd put a response to the Marcus Camby stuff over here in the
    UMass note, where it belongs.
    
    First of all, thanks to Frank for standing in for the editor while I
    was in a couple of long meeitings yesterday.  I HATE IT when people
    misuse it's and its!
    
    As for Camby, his college career was good, but not great.  His freshman
    season showed a lot of potential, but little dominance.  In his
    sophomore year, his game improved, but he had trouble dealing with big,
    strong centers.  HIs junior year was terrific.  His team won the
    Atlantic 10 regualr season and tourney titles all three years he
    played, but UMass also won both two years beofre he arrived on campus.
    
    According to a statistical analysis of strength of schedule I saw (and
    I went back and checked), UMass played the 4th toughest, toughest, and
    2nd toughest non-league schedules the past three years, so their
    success was amazing.  UMass does have the most wins of any Division 1
    school for the past three years, but no NCAA title.
    
    In sum, Marcus was a very good collegiate player, and his UMass teams
    were a lot of fun to watch, but they never won an NCAA title and
    reached the Final Four only once.  Hardly the heights all-time great
    teams achieve.
    
    NAZZ
77.2584MKOTS3::BREENFri Aug 16 1996 15:0421
    Thanks Nazz but not the point.  I fully know that at this time most
    observers fairly put Marcus down the line on all time college greats.
    What I was pointing out was UMass schedule during the regular season
    and later qualified it by its intersectional content.
    
    Schedule ratings don't make that qualification and have one other big
    problem, the highest ranked teams with corresponding rating points don't
    get to play themselves.  So Syracuse for example  got to include UMass for 
    bonus points but UMass in the same game only gets #16 Syracuse.  A
    better way of putting it is that UMass regular season success
    consistently dropped its opponents down in the rankings making its
    strength of schedule lower and lower.
    
    A #1 ranked team with a 3 or 4 in statistical strength of schedule is
    probably extremely rare or a first.
    
    Finally if there truly are folks who sincerely believe that Marcus
    wasn't the key to UMass' success over the last three seasons then the
    Flat Earth Society should be able to make a comeback.  All those poor,
    stupid coaches with their double and triple teaming and sleepless nights
    worrying about Marcus, if only they'd known.
77.2585Man overboard...EDWIN::WAUGAMANHardball, good ol' countryFri Aug 16 1996 15:1924
    
>    Finally if there truly are folks who sincerely believe that Marcus
>    wasn't the key to UMass' success over the last three seasons then the
>    Flat Earth Society should be able to make a comeback.
    
    Well, he wasn't the key in the first year you refer to, so you've
    got to make some adjustment for that.
    
    Also, inter-conference schedule is only part of strength of schedule,
    and a minority part at that.  Conferences are not easily compared
    but that is not the same thing as saying that they are all equal.
    As was pointed out, any reasonable observer could look at certain
    UNC and Duke runs from within the ACC, 1980-present, and conclude 
    that their results versus schedule were superlative.
    
    I'd have been more impressed with UMass' run had they ever been able
    to handle George Washington, the kind of opponent that Wooden's UCLA
    teams would never have let down for.  But as it stands, regular-season
    combined with the NCAA tourney disappointments (you can't omit this) 
    in 2 of the 3 years (potential game-fixing aside) leaves Camby's 
    3-year run maybe somewhere in the Top 50, all-time.  Maybe.
    
    glenn
    
77.2586MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Aug 16 1996 15:4610
    
  >> Finally if there truly are folks who sincerely believe that Marcus
  >> wasn't the key to UMass' success over the last three seasons then the
  
     I don't. His freshamn and sophmore years, UMass was Lou Roe's team
     Last year it was a team effort and that was never clearer than when
     Marcus went down. They managed to go undefeated during that span.
     If anything last season, UMass went as Camrelo Traveiso went. If
     Carmelo could get off, Umass had that outside-inside thang going
     and were virtually unstoppable. 
77.2587#50 - stick to baseball GlennMKOTS3::BREENFri Aug 16 1996 15:4414
    Wasn't it Camby's freshman year that he had the big game with Joe Smith
    of Maryland, an "upset" in the Ncaa where Smith had his great coming
    out because of his great play vs the already clearly outstanding Marcus
    Camby?
    
    My statement stands, take regular season schedule with special emphasis
    on playing traditional powers outside of the conference, success with
    the schedule including victories over Arkansas and Kentucky among many
    others combined finally with the reliance of the team to reach those
    heights on the man Camby and I can't think of one player/team that
    matches up.  Laettner had Hill most of his career.
    
    Patrick Ewing is a pretty good comparison except Georgetown never made
    it a habit to play a strong non-conference schedule.
77.2588MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove.Fri Aug 16 1996 15:546
    
      You're one of my favorite ::SPORTS people, billthe but
     you're being Maiewski-esque on this one. And that's not
     a compliment. Giving Marcus Top 50 is being generous. 
     Very generous.
    
77.2589Huh???YIELD::BARBIERISun Aug 18 1996 14:585
      re: .2587
    
      My top two picks would be Bill Walton and Lew Alcindor.
    
      How'dja miss them???
77.2590MKOTS3::BREENMon Aug 19 1996 15:4418
    Sorry for the late response 
    
    Tony, in comparing Marcus Camby vs Walton and Alicindor I would first
    quickly grant that neither Camby nor UMass was quite in the class of
    that pair and their UCLA teams.  However here is the difference:
    
    The supporting casts were far superior in those UCLA years
    
    Those teams mainly played their conference with a few intersectional
    games.
    
    The two UCLA years between those two both resulted in championships. 
    Bird and Magic were better examples of single player dominance (teams
    did nothing without them) but not over three years.  In fact Lou Roe
    can be compared to Greg Kelsor, both had a Camby or a Johnson to make
    them look much better.
    
    Billte
77.2591just imoYIELD::BARBIERIMon Aug 19 1996 19:269
      Hi Bill,
    
        I hear what you're saying about supporting cast, but one could
        conceivably penalize someone on that basis!  Walton was absolutely
        dominant in college hoops.
    
        Imo, Camby couldn't touch either of those guys.
    
    						Tony
77.2592MKOTS3::BREENMon Aug 19 1996 21:074
    As a college player rated vs his own competition no.  In that
    definition Russell is still #1.  The college competition Camby played
    against, regardless of which decade you're talking about, was tougher.
    Alcindor had no big man competition, Walton very little.
77.2593CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsMon Aug 19 1996 21:279
  Health is also a question with Camby. I'm still wondering why he collapsed
last year. That's usually a sign that something's not right.

  His physical came up empty but was that because there was nothing there or
because they missed something?

  Living in Boston makes you a little gun shy about those sort of things.

  George
77.2594Or for that matter I know a "papa" that's will'nMKOTS3::BREENTue Aug 20 1996 14:0612
    I agree George, as much as I love him I am wary about all these things.
    His taking the cash is disturbing even though those rules are so
    artificial as to make them 55 mph speed limit type laws.
    
    I'm surprised you never responded to my note about colleges signing
    players to standard contracts and then selling the contracts to the
    nba/nfl like the minor leagues prior to Rickey's revolutionary farm
    system.  I don't know where the note was.
    
    On the plus side is his playing up in Toronto vs NY or Boston.  I wish
    they could move in one of those "mamas" like in Tank McNamara to see he
    gets to bed early and eats well.
77.2595CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Aug 20 1996 16:0231
RE                      <<< Note 77.2594 by MKOTS3::BREEN >>>

>    I'm surprised you never responded to my note about colleges signing
>    players to standard contracts and then selling the contracts to the
>    nba/nfl like the minor leagues prior to Rickey's revolutionary farm
>    system.  I don't know where the note was.
    
  Didn't see the note.

  I doubt it would work, there would be all sorts of problems.

  One big one that comes to mind is that student athletes are not normally
employees of the college. If they did become employees then in many cases that
would mean they were government employees since so many of the larger schools
are state colleges or universities . I've got to believe that the whole issue
selling contracts of state employees to private companies like NBA and NFL
teams is a can of worms no one looks forward to opening. 

  There are also federal government regulations like Title IX that pertain to
public schools and their funding. All those regulations would have to be
considered when deciding how selling these contracts worked. Then no doubt the
various states that run many of these universities have regulations as to what
is allowed and what is not allowed. 

  At the very least colleges would have to provide equal opportunity to women
with regard to these contracts which now takes you from the can of worm stage
to the proverbial alligators in the swamp. 

  I'm not saying these problems couldn't be worked out but it wouldn't be easy.

  George 
77.2596A good idea is at least worth discussingMKOTS3::BREENTue Aug 20 1996 16:5427
    The problem is college big time sports is a very real business if for
    no other reason than the dollars involved.  Title IX ramifications are
    a good example: a defacto "truce" is worked out at the large
    universities to allow for profits from football and basketball to buy
    compliance regardless of the legal niceties (a topic all its own).

    Many students work for the college while at school.  The contract would
    cover stipend pay similar to the "contract" entered into today and
    which Camby has been accused of violating.  The big money for the
    student would come when his contract is sold to the nba - note
    absurdities like the draft and rookie minimums would cease to exist
    with this concept, colleges would insist on their legal right to sell
    to the highest bidder.
    
    The big problem is that the college system works like a communist
    system but in an increasingly capitalist framework.  Like communism it
    becomes increasingly more complex in its rules and either draconian in
    prosecution or the opposite (eg Miami).  What the colleges today have
    is a system that's not working with no attempt to remedy like the
    obsolescence of the Soviet military in the 80s.
    
    But as long as the big money keeps flowing in nothing this drastic
    would ever happen but without a drastic change like this the money will
    dry up by 2000 and it will be too late.  Let's see how basketball fares
    the next five years without the top 18-22 year old talent - I could be
    totally wrong here come to think of it; perhaps no one will notice or
    care.
77.2597CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsTue Aug 20 1996 17:2211
  I don't know if this is allowed or not, but something that might be simpler
is to do what they do in world class amateur sports which is to allow College
athletes to take endorsement money. 

  The advantage of that is that it would not be coming from the state nor would
they be getting paid directly for playing ball. 

  Also, allow gifts from alumni. Again, that's not salary and it's not from the
public till.

  George
77.2598MKOTS3::BREENWed Aug 21 1996 15:2318
    But that wouldn't help them compete with the nfl/nba or for that matter
    major league baseball and hockey.  I'm trying to use good old fashioned
    greed productively; colleges today on top of gate and tv revenues are
    milking the merchandising cash cow and are not going to want to give up
    any of it, certainly not to the athletes that are earning it for them.
    
    But when corrupted greed clashes with corrupted greed (ncaa vs nba fe.)
    there may be an opportunity.  In this case the nba has been using the
    colleges as a development farm, probably less for pure skills
    development than as a marketing arm, and the colleges get nada.  By
    selling the contracts the bonus goes to the athletes with a percentage
    going back to the colleges not to speak of what they can reap by
    playing off the nba teams against each other.
    
    What mainly makes this unworkable is the concept of the pristine amateur
    that the ncaa promotes and is a nice idea but takes a little more
    capacity for hypocricy than I can handle.  But your idea doesn't help
    either.
77.2599CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Aug 21 1996 15:4920
  I understand what you are saying but like I said, there would probably be
legal problems at both the state and federal levels if colleges tried to sign
students at to contracts then sell them to the NBA. 

  It all boils down to sorting out just what the sports fan market wants in a
2nd level of basketball. If the majority of fans are mainly interested in
watching this level of basketball because of school affiliation or because they
like seeing players work for nothing then no compensation system will work. 
What ever you put in place will drive the fans away.

  On the other hand if there are tons of fans fed up with paying the kinds of
prices they demand at NBA games, then maybe the NBA could create a minor league
system like they have in hockey. It would be an alternative for those kids
who want to make money playing basketball between the highschool and NBA level
and would allow NBA teams to keep a reserve squad of players sharp so that they
could be used for both player development and injury replacement.

  Might be fun having the little Celtics in Worcester at $15 a ticket.

  George
77.2600Can someone tell me what colleges get for feeding nba?MKOTS3::BREENWed Aug 21 1996 17:4829
    As I said if colleges are skating legal requirements related to their
    non-profit status along with in many cases status as state run
    corporations while executing multiple merchandising, concessionaire and
    other contracts then I don't see this putting them over the top.  Okay,
    so the contract buying and selling has to belong to a for-profit agency,
    so what?  That's a nit.
    
    "2nd level" it's not.  You're the one who makes the point that a sport
    is whatever one wants to make it as long as it's profitable, whether thru
    the exploitation of junior high girls in a milieu that King Darius of
    4th century Persia would have put out of business as "cruel and unusual
    punishment" or inner city 16-23 year olds.  You should be the one to
    assert that the big money that ncaa basketball earns make's it major
    league, period.
    
    Here's an example.  A player gets "drafted" out of college in the first
    round and then summarily dropped by the drafting team without a
    contract being offered.  What's "draft" mean?  Absolutely nothing other
    than a gentleman's agreement among pro owners to split the labor pool
    which they have kept down thru the ages because there's no body with a
    self interest to oppose it.  Do they even execute an option (say $20 k)
    for this right payable to the draftee?  No, "You don't count and can't
    make yourself count" counter the nba.  Does the college, say UConn, care
    after this player made several million dollars for the team over four
    years?  Of course not, there's no profit in it.
    
    Now if that player had a contract with UConn then the drafting team
    would have had to exercise an option to even draft him.  Just this in
    itself would start the leverage process.
77.2601CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Aug 21 1996 18:1839
RE                      <<< Note 77.2600 by MKOTS3::BREEN >>>

>    As I said if colleges are skating legal requirements related to their
>    non-profit status along with in many cases status as state run
>    corporations while executing multiple merchandising, concessionaire and
>    other contracts then I don't see this putting them over the top.  

  I believe that there are many more regulations involving state and federal
funding when it comes to the relationship between schools and their students
than there are with regard to things like merchandising. For example, schools
are require by law to offer equal services to male and female students but they
are not required to provide the public with an equal number of t-shirts for
men's and women's sports. 

  Maybe you could find loopholes but at best it would be a can of worms and so
far I haven't seen any big win for the NBA. This is an NCAA problem, not the
NBA's problem. As far as the NBA is concerned, so what if there are recruiting
violations at E.S.U.?

>    "2nd level" it's not.  You're the one who makes the point that a sport
>    is whatever one wants to make it as long as it's profitable, 

  Different argument. Sure anything that someone finds fun is a sport but
when it comes to basketball the NBA is a higher level in terms of talent
and ability than college just as the American and National League are a higher
level than AAA. To the NBA, College is their minor league. It's where the
development of younger players takes place. It's not a complete minor league
in that it lacks journeymen veterans who are keeping sharp but it fills the
development function.

>    Now if that player had a contract with UConn then the drafting team
>    would have had to exercise an option to even draft him.  Just this in
>    itself would start the leverage process.

  And in exchange the NBA gets what? Legal problems. Why bother, if the NBA
wants a real minor league they can go out and create one. Why open the can of
worms?

  George
77.2602MKOTS3::BREENWed Aug 21 1996 20:0526
    George is it me?  How can you miss the essential point.  Nothing in
    what I'm saying is for the benefit of the nba (or nfl or any other pro
    league).  Yes, the nba is using the ncaa basketball leagues as a farm
    system and the colleges get nada out of it.  That is my point, the
    colleges should benefit.
    
     In order to reap the benefit the colleges have to establish a legal
    relationship with their clients.  Up to now it hasn't been worth their
    while since they are making big bucks without salary requirements. 
    Title IX, a political (however moral) decision of the supreme court,
    squeezed some of that profit back to female college students (and
    colleges without a high margin like B.U. and Brown end up squeezing
    their male incumbent students to pay for it).
    
    Now the NBA, even if not pro-actively, is putting the squeeze on
    college basketball by signing top talent away.  Some athletes let the
    cat out of the bag that is illegal payments to athletes.  This is
    mainly covered up and the Cambys of the world are pointed at as
    'unethical' while (fe.) nothing is said of pro teams drafting and not
    signing athletes.
    
    What do you think is the real reason that colleges don't want to pay
    their athletes?  They don't want to share!  By making the pro teams pay
    for what they are getting for free and then squandering on the Dee
    Browns of the world both the colleges and the athletes in general
    benefit.
77.2603CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Aug 21 1996 20:2033
RE                      <<< Note 77.2602 by MKOTS3::BREEN >>>

>    What do you think is the real reason that colleges don't want to pay
>    their athletes?  They don't want to share!  By making the pro teams pay
>    for what they are getting for free and then squandering on the Dee
>    Browns of the world both the colleges and the athletes in general
>    benefit.

  Well I'm not sure that not wanting to share is their only reason. I believe
there are other obstacles to signing contracts and paying student athletes.

  Remember, a contract is only good if it is legal. If it breaks a law then
it's not worth the paper it's written on. It could well be that Title IX could
be interpreted as saying that what ever you pay the guys to play basketball you
have to pay the women. And once this started, various states might start
passing laws to stop the practice at their universities.

  Then you get into other problems. What if a kids grades fall off? Does the
contract say he has to sit out and not play? Other colleges as a recruiting
gimmick would drop that clause. Then they would be forced to pay a kid whether
he got good grades or not.

  Then there is the other issue of killing the goose that produces the golden
eggs. Many fans can't stand the fact that athletes make lots of money, you hear
that all the time. It's the 2nd to the most intense feeling expressed by fans
right after "Yippee, we won" and ranks ahead of "he took off his helmet /
didn't take off his hat". I've got to believe that tons of these people are
attracted to college hoops because they know the kids get zilch for their
efforts. Start paying them and suddenly these fans will think of college hoops
as just another bunch of pros getting paid to play while they have to work for
a living. 

  George 
77.2604Btw the time is NOW for this what with intern'l,ppv etcMKOTS3::BREENWed Aug 21 1996 21:0842
    I agree the beloved hypocrisy of the amateur athlete is a big stumbling
    block.  Assuredly you predicted several years back that if the IOC
    publicly admitted that track athletes were professionals then the
    Olympics would be doomed not to speak of inviting unabashed
    professional basketball,tennis and other athletes.  Sarcasm aside with
    college athletics there is a certain Coach K style feel-goodism among
    many fans although U of Las Vegas is a thriving success as long as they
    win, amateurism be damned.
    
    What you described about Title IX is exactly what happened.  You refer
    to "Law", I believe it was a court decision.  Is there a law enacted by
    Congress and signed by a president?  But in the enforcement of Title
    IX, money talked and universities like Nebraska and Alabama were
    allowed to reserve the lions share of big time sport money for the
    earning sports as long as they funded the non-earning woman's sports.
    This is similar to courts allowing the college drafts as long as a
    collective bargaining agreement is in effect.  Nonsense, but a working
    compromise which is the methodology of courts nowadays anyway.
    
    In fact my proposal would enhance compliance with Title ix by providing
    the funding for it in two main ways:
    
    	By offering an alternative to the nba/nfl for high school and
    under-class prospects:
    
    		money now for expenses
    
    		money in the future for what they are earning now thru
		their efforts (merchandising,appearances,advances(*)
    
    		better leverage in bargaining with pro leagues, the
    		effective elimination of the draft
    
    	2) By colleges getting a share of the sale of the sale of the
    "contract".  This is swallowed by agents today a species hopefully
    eliminated by this concept (probably hired by the colleges to do the
    work of negotiation with the pro-teams).  Athletes might very well
    contract with the universities to do lifetime negotiation with nba/nfl.
    
    Leverage.  Well after several years the colleges will have an entire
    league under contract and if nba/nfl won't play by their rules then
    colleges will put them out of business with their own superior league.
77.2605CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. ChampsWed Aug 21 1996 21:1920
  Well you've sold me. I have no problem with a plan like that at all. but I'm
not going to hold my breath. Fans of amateur sports will storm the walls for
reasons we've discussed.

>    What you described about Title IX is exactly what happened.  You refer
>    to "Law", I believe it was a court decision.  Is there a law enacted by
>    Congress and signed by a president?  

  I believe that Title IX is the 9th section of a major education bill from
back in the 60's. Or maybe it's from the 1964 Civil Rights act, I forget. One
of it's sections had to do with women's rights. In either case it would have
been passed by Congress and signed by the president. 

  If the Supreme Court was involved then that meant there was some dispute
as to what the law meant. Either the Government or one of the parties brought
a suit, the case was decided, appealed to the Supreme Court, they heard it and
gave an opinion. That Opinion is now "Case Law" and creates precedent as to
how the law is to be interpreted.

  George
77.2606MKOTS3::BREENThu Aug 22 1996 15:0611
    Well topically speaking the ncaa has made a small move in this
    direction: They are moving or have moved to allow for loans to college
    prospects.  I'm sure that to get to the "vision" I have described it
    will have to come in small steps.  One of the small steps has to do
    with college athletes being drafted and not signed.
    
    That could be an aggressive, first step for colleges: requiring
    professional teams to purchase an option for the right of drafting
    college players.  This would obviously be part of a future salary if
    player is signed but it would penalize teams that frivolously
    draft without intent to sign.
77.2607Lou Roe, Derek Kellogg, Marcus Camby - those were the days!TNPUBS::NAZZAROZydeco!Mon Aug 26 1996 19:2820
    With the extensive number of reruns and lousy shows on TV lately, I
    pulled out the UMass - Arkansas tape from 1994 over the weekend.  What
    a great game.  Lou Roe dunking off the tap, and totally dominating
    Corliss Williamson.  The incredible depth on the team - Calipari played
    11 guys in the first half, and Mike Williams was sitting out a one game
    suspension!
    
    I am convinced that if that team were intact for the NCAA tournament,
    they would have won the national title.  There is no way they lose to
    Oklahoma Statre if Edgar Padilla played (he was out with a sprained
    ankle), or if Mike WIlliams played (Cal had bounced him from the team
    by then, of course), or if Andre Burks was healthy.  The depth in the
    backcourt was totally depleted, and that depth got UMass to the
    tourney.  Add Lou Roe's hamstring injury, which prevented him from
    pushing off on his right leg, and UMass was really in a tough spot vs
    Big Country and Co.  But I am sure that UMass wins that game four times
    out of five with healthy personnel, even without Mike Williams.  With
    that entire team intact, they don't lose to anyone.
    
    NAZZ
77.2608IMBETR::DUPREZIt's Baseball And You're An AmericanMon Aug 26 1996 19:469
Nazz,

When you step through the tape of the Ok. St. game, frame by frame, do you
see someone emerging from behind a grassy knoll in the corner of the stadium
to force a ref to call a foul on Marcus Camby?

If so, I think Billte would like to see the tape... :-)

-R
77.2609MKOTS3::BREENMon Aug 26 1996 21:089
    Nazz if you have the tape of OSU I would be very interested to see if
    it was the same ref calling the fouls on Camby everytime he coughed.
    There is a myth perpetrated by even otherwise knowledgable fans that
    Camby was outplayed by Big Country.  Camby picked up quick phantom
    fouls within minutes of the start of the second half and each time he
    set foot on the court another "foul" was called.
    
    OSU played a good game and might very well have won a fairly refereed
    game but we will never know.
77.2610ha ha haROCK::GRONOWSKIMon Aug 26 1996 21:282
    
    The dreaded Clemson refs again.
77.2611Another tough and entertaining scheduleTNPUBS::NAZZAROZydeco!Tue Aug 27 1996 16:0347

	1996-97 UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BASKETBALL SCHEDULE
	-------------------------------------------------------

	Wed.  Nov. 6   	7:00	MARATHON OIL (exhibition)
	Fri.  Nov. 15   7:00	CONVERSE ALL-STARS (exhibition)
	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
	Mon.  Nov. 25	12:30AM Maui Invitational vs Chaminade	 ESPN
	Tue.  Nov. 26	TBD	Maui Invitational, 2nd round	 ESPN
	Wed.  Nov. 27	TBD	Maui Invitational, championship  ESPN

	Wed.  Dec. 4	7:30	Great Eight vs Georgetown	 ESPN
	Sat.  Dec. 7	TBA	TBA				 ----
	Tue.  Dec. 10	7:30	FRESNO STATE			 ESPN
	Thu.  Dec. 12	TBA	DREXEL				 ----
	Sat.  Dec. 14 	8:30	at Wake Forest			 ESPN
	Fri.  Dec. 20   9:00	Jimmy V Classic vs No. Carolina  ESPN
	Sun.  Dec. 22	3:30	at North Carolina-Wilmington	 ----
	Fri.  Dec. 27	7:00	at UConn			 ESPN

	Thu.  Jan. 2	TBA	vs Davidson in Puerto Rico	 ESPN-2
	Sun.  Jan. 5	TBA	* ST. JOSEPH'S			 A-10
	Wed.  Jan. 8	TBA	* at LaSalle			 A-10
	Sun.  Jan. 12	TBA	* VIRGINIA TECH			 A-10
	Tue.  Jan. 14   9:00	* at St. Bonaventure		 ESPN-2
	Sat.  Jan. 18	2:00	at Boston College		 CBS
	Tue.  Jan. 21	TBA	* RHODE ISLAND			 A-10
	Sat.  Jan. 25	12:00PM * at Temple			 ESPN
	Thu.  Jan. 30	7:30	* at George Washington		 ESPN
	
	Sat.  Feb. 1	2:00	* XAVIER			 ABC
	Mon.  Feb. 3	TBA	* at Fordham			 ----
	Thu.  Feb. 6	TBA	* DUQUESNE			 A-10
	Sat.  Feb. 8	12:00PM * at Rhode Island		 ESPN
	Tue.  Feb. 11	TBA	* St. Bonaventure		 A-10
	Sat.  Feb. 15	1:30	Maryland at Worcester Centrum    ABC
	Thu.  Feb. 20	TBA	* FORDHAM			 ----
	Sun.  Feb. 23	TBA	* at Dayton			 A-10
	Tue.  Feb. 25	9:30	* at St. Joseph's		 ESPN-2
	Sat.  Mar. 1	2:00	* TEMPLE			 ABC	  


	HOME GAMES in caps
	* = Atlantic 10 Conference games

NAZZ
77.2612PECAD8::CHILDSTue Aug 27 1996 16:555
WoW Dec 4 and JT's playing a game that means something? Wish that one was at
the Centrum. Maryland game should be just fine entertainment though.

mc
77.2613Not at Conte I presumeMKOTS3::BREENWed Aug 28 1996 12:551
    Is that game "At Boston College" at the new garden on 1/18?
77.2614UMass/BC is at the FleetCenterTNPUBS::NAZZAROZydeco!Wed Aug 28 1996 17:558
    Yes, that's at the FleetCenter.  The Davidson game is supposed to be in
    Puerto Rico (Davidson is replacing Manhattan, who backed out after Fran
    Friscilla left).  There is still a chance that game will be played at
    Davidson.  If it is played in P.R., then UMass can add that game on
    Dec. 7 that's TBA now.  If they play in South Carolina, then UMass
    can't add an extra game to the schedule.
    
    NAZZ
77.2615BC tastes lots of creampuff yet againTNPUBS::NAZZAROTwo months to Maui - Go UMass!Fri Sep 20 1996 17:2732
77.2616MSBCS::BRYDIEViolently apatheticFri Sep 20 1996 17:452
77.2617MKOTS3::BREENMon Sep 23 1996 13:502
77.2618Camby injured HBAHBA::HAASNot A Sane Chap Anywhere 'RoundWed Oct 09 1996 16:1012
77.2619report on UMass' first exhibition of the yearWRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatThu Nov 07 1996 14:1257
77.2620UMass tickets for sale from the NinjTNPUBS::NAZZAROWelcome back, NBA!Thu Nov 07 1996 17:1018
77.2621BRAT::taydhcp-23-144-238.tay.dec.com::LongWtaxation without representationThu Nov 07 1996 17:276
77.2622John Hendry - a man with an appetite fer beachballsTNPUBS::NAZZAROWelcome back, NBA!Fri Nov 08 1996 15:304
77.2623anyone else want to go to the Duquesne game?BRAT::taydhcp-23-16-29.tay.dec.com::LongWtaxation without representationFri Nov 08 1996 16:596
77.2624CambyYIELD::BARBIERIWed Nov 20 1996 20:463
77.2625CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westWed Nov 20 1996 21:176
77.2626MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Nov 21 1996 11:493
77.2627A 6-11 small forward who can run the floor and block shotsTNPUBS::NAZZAROWelcome back, NBA!Thu Nov 21 1996 13:567
77.2628Camby/AgentsWMOIS::SCHOTTThu Nov 21 1996 14:3423
77.2629PECAD8::CHILDSThu Nov 21 1996 15:376
77.2630Last time anyone in here will laugh at meMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Nov 21 1996 17:5956
77.2631I schmoozed a lot last night, and heard nothingTNPUBS::NAZZAROWelcome back, NBA!Thu Nov 21 1996 18:587
77.2632Nazz starts national rumor - great jobMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Nov 21 1996 19:394
77.2633McDonough says what he pleases, whether true or notTNPUBS::NAZZAROWelcome back, NBA!Fri Nov 22 1996 13:497
77.2634Will must have heard it somewhereMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Nov 22 1996 17:583
77.2635UMass up 9 at halfTNPUBS::NAZZAROBC - the next Holy CrossMon Nov 25 1996 17:558
77.2636Bruiser wins his first game this seasonTNPUBS::NAZZAROBC - the next Holy CrossMon Nov 25 1996 18:5911
77.2637Maui-ZowieWMOIS::SCHOTTWed Nov 27 1996 15:0444
77.2638A learning experienceTNPUBS::NAZZAROBC - the next Holy CrossWed Nov 27 1996 15:1516
77.2639WRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatWed Nov 27 1996 16:1729
77.2640Let's not panic ..... yet!WMOIS::SCHOTTWed Nov 27 1996 16:5525
77.2641BE>>>>>>>>A10WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSWed Nov 27 1996 17:111
77.2642MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Nov 27 1996 18:335
77.2643"Wake Up Call out West"AKOCOA::TROYSun Dec 01 1996 21:4812
77.2644oopsHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Wed Dec 11 1996 11:5511
77.2645Very Shaky StartGLRMAI::WILKESWed Dec 11 1996 12:146
77.2646MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Dec 11 1996 13:145
77.2647My son said "Kellogg never looked so good"TNPUBS::NAZZAROBC - the next Holy CrossWed Dec 11 1996 13:3721
77.2648MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Dec 11 1996 14:059
77.2649ROCK::GRONOWSKIWed Dec 11 1996 16:452
77.2650BIGQ::MCKAYWed Dec 11 1996 18:095
77.2651WAC>>>>A10WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSWed Dec 11 1996 18:398
77.2652IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Wed Dec 11 1996 19:037
77.2653CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsWed Dec 11 1996 19:2714
77.2654AWECIM::RUSSOclaimin!Wed Dec 11 1996 20:369
77.2655BIGQ::MCKAYThu Dec 12 1996 10:3812
77.2656CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Dec 12 1996 11:367
77.2657It's CoughlinPECAD8::CHILDSThu Dec 12 1996 11:490
77.2658ROCK::GRONOWSKIThu Dec 12 1996 13:162
77.2659Conklin? Charley O'Conklin?MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Dec 12 1996 13:161
77.2660Camby along with other pros on Sullivan listMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Dec 12 1996 13:3310
77.2661BIGQ::MCKAYThu Dec 12 1996 13:373
77.2662MSBCS::BRYDIEJust cover, baby!Thu Dec 12 1996 13:585
77.2663"Effort=Results, and where is it?AKOCOA::TROYThu Dec 12 1996 13:5818
77.2664Blow-outWMOIS::SCHOTTThu Dec 12 1996 14:5028
77.2665Still hope for a 20 win season and an NCAA berthTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruiserball!Thu Dec 12 1996 18:2118
77.2666WRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatFri Dec 13 1996 13:1622
77.2667Last 30 minutes last night were impressiveTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruiserball!Fri Dec 13 1996 13:1614
77.2668Wake (and the 'Heels) will be tough to beat!WMOIS::SCHOTTFri Dec 13 1996 15:0742
77.2669lawyer tries to extort CambyHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Thu Dec 19 1996 14:5967
77.2670Merry Christmas DannyMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Dec 20 1996 20:0614
77.2671CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastMon Dec 23 1996 12:023
77.2672CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Dec 23 1996 12:1815
77.2673CSLALL::BRULEScooter Macgruder rulesMon Dec 23 1996 12:196
77.2674EDWIN::WAUGAMANMon Dec 23 1996 12:3715
77.2675ATHLETE HAS SEX, SUN RISES IN EASTCLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Dec 23 1996 12:484
77.2676MSBCS::BRYDIEJust cover, baby!Mon Dec 23 1996 12:556
77.2677CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Dec 23 1996 13:2228
77.2678Don't want my son wastin' his time on mediocre material ;-)TNPUBS::NAZZAROBruiserball!Mon Dec 23 1996 13:233
77.2679The "U Game"WMOIS::SCHOTTTue Dec 24 1996 14:2336
77.2680BIGQ::MCKAYTue Dec 24 1996 15:2912
77.2681all that and maybe moneyHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Thu Dec 26 1996 15:2021
77.2682MSBCS::BRYDIEJust cover, baby!Thu Dec 26 1996 15:334
77.2683BIGQ::MCKAYThu Dec 26 1996 17:173
77.2684UMass-UConn analysisTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruiserball!Thu Dec 26 1996 17:5834
77.2685CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Dec 30 1996 13:1129
77.2686Camby knew his roleHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 30 1996 16:3511
77.2687CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Dec 30 1996 17:5128
77.2688took the goodies and ranHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Mon Dec 30 1996 17:5815
77.2689SNAX::ERICKSONMon Dec 30 1996 19:2110
77.2690CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Dec 30 1996 19:2536
77.2691It only matters what the NCAA says..ODIXIE::ZOGRANNo directions neededMon Dec 30 1996 19:4810
77.2692CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Dec 30 1996 20:086
77.2693PECAD8::CHILDSReeves in 97Tue Dec 31 1996 11:229
77.2694CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Dec 31 1996 11:3614
77.2695BIGQ::MCKAYTue Dec 31 1996 11:4217
77.2696WMOIS::SCHOTTTue Dec 31 1996 11:5316
77.2697EDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Tue Dec 31 1996 12:4416
77.2698CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Dec 31 1996 13:1423
77.2699follow the moneyHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 31 1996 13:4712
77.2700not all badHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 31 1996 14:1323
77.2701CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Dec 31 1996 14:177
77.2702SNAX::ERICKSONTue Dec 31 1996 14:2813
77.2703shore nuffHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 31 1996 14:2913
77.2704work studyHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 31 1996 14:3315
77.2705CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Dec 31 1996 15:3919
77.2706right afore hell freezin overHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Tue Dec 31 1996 15:4513
77.2707EDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Tue Dec 31 1996 16:0917
77.2708CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Dec 31 1996 16:1710
77.2709What you'd get wouldn't be prettyEDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Tue Dec 31 1996 16:3136
77.2710MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manTue Dec 31 1996 16:366
77.2711don't woe meHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Thu Jan 02 1997 13:2825
77.2712Hardly a scumbagMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Jan 02 1997 15:0623
77.2713Pell GrantsHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Thu Jan 02 1997 15:086
77.2714MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manThu Jan 02 1997 15:105
77.2715SNAX::ERICKSONThu Jan 02 1997 16:029
77.2716nothing freeHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Thu Jan 02 1997 16:1510
77.2717CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 03 1997 12:0637
77.2718MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manFri Jan 03 1997 12:256
77.2719CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 03 1997 12:4121
77.2720More than the pros, it's the school, the uniEDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Fri Jan 03 1997 12:5619
77.2721CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 03 1997 13:0732
77.2722CSC32::MACGREGORColorado: the TRUE mid-westFri Jan 03 1997 13:157
77.2723MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manFri Jan 03 1997 13:4011
77.2724MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Jan 03 1997 13:4812
77.2725CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 03 1997 13:5319
77.2726Just don't lose JohnMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Jan 03 1997 13:578
77.2727carry onHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 13:599
77.2728polling?HBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 14:016
77.2729In 97% of all cases of courseEDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Fri Jan 03 1997 14:0210
77.2730MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manFri Jan 03 1997 14:1015
77.2731looked the partHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 14:1313
77.2732EDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Fri Jan 03 1997 14:1511
77.2733CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 03 1997 14:2219
77.2734and on, and onHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 14:2610
77.2735CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 03 1997 14:2720
77.2736CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 03 1997 14:3011
77.2737not meHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 14:3318
77.2738more sidesHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 14:3715
77.2739MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Jan 03 1997 14:4516
77.2740It's "college" because of the collegeEDWIN::WAUGAMANChad Brown da main!Fri Jan 03 1997 14:4819
77.2741college not always loyalHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 14:5426
77.2742MSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manFri Jan 03 1997 14:5922
77.2743CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 03 1997 16:0034
77.2744a callingHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 16:4510
77.2745CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 03 1997 17:0723
77.2746no agents, pleaseHBAHBA::HAASThank ya just a whole lot.Fri Jan 03 1997 17:1313
77.2747Money ain't the answer for everythingMSBCS::BRYDIEKazaam's my manFri Jan 03 1997 17:1619
77.2748CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastFri Jan 03 1997 17:314
77.2749SALEM::DODAHow could we know that promises end?Fri Jan 03 1997 18:264
77.2750CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsFri Jan 03 1997 18:3230
77.2751Plus, you have the victim mentalityBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredFri Jan 03 1997 18:427
77.2752MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Jan 03 1997 18:5711
77.2753UMass in dire straitsTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruiserball!Mon Jan 06 1997 17:1618
77.2754BIGQ::MCKAYMon Jan 06 1997 17:2911
77.2755Toughest part of the schedule is in the next three weeksTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruiserball!Tue Jan 07 1997 14:1511
77.2756Minutemen survive vs LaSalleTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruiserball!Thu Jan 09 1997 13:3915
77.2757"a LOOONG season now awaits"AKOCOA::TROYMon Jan 13 1997 12:1710
77.2758IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Tue Jan 14 1997 11:536
77.2759My P=name says it allTNPUBS::NAZZAROBring back COach Cal!Tue Jan 14 1997 14:2434
77.2760BIGQ::MCKAYTue Jan 14 1997 14:4210
77.2761I spelled Russ' name wrong - it's Schott; sorry, Russ!TNPUBS::NAZZAROBring back Coach Cal!Tue Jan 14 1997 15:2111
77.2762"Respect is earned"AKOCOA::TROYTue Jan 14 1997 19:3514
77.2763MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 14 1997 19:535
77.2764Light at the end of the tunnel?TNPUBS::NAZZAROBring back Coach Cal!Wed Jan 15 1997 15:1012
77.2765SALEM::DODAOne World within....Wed Jan 15 1997 15:159
77.2766so what else is newMKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationWed Jan 15 1997 16:016
77.2767PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 15 1997 16:365
77.2768MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Jan 15 1997 16:466
77.2769BC looks solidIMINMK::SILVESTRIPenuts Gang turns 10 in 1997!Wed Jan 15 1997 17:0729
77.2770Starting to feel not as pessimisticTNPUBS::NAZZAROBring back Coach Cal!Wed Jan 15 1997 17:3813
77.2771MKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationWed Jan 15 1997 17:415
77.2772WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPSWed Jan 15 1997 18:5614
77.2773PECAD8::CHILDSSteelers get a pants-down spankingWed Jan 15 1997 19:528
77.2774"3 guard set worked against BC today"AKOCOA::TROYSun Jan 19 1997 01:2510
77.2775Finally .... a good WIN!!!WMOIS::SCHOTTMon Jan 20 1997 18:3214
77.2776Wish UMass could play more Big East teamsTNPUBS::NAZZAROBring back Coach Cal!Tue Jan 21 1997 12:4313
77.2777"Bombs Away Sink Temple"NETRIX::&quot;Bill.Troy@pko.mts.dec.com&quot;Bill TroySat Jan 25 1997 17:5511
Well, Bruiser dared Temple to follow UMASS outside - they didn't bite 
- and it was BOMBS AWAY time!!!  Excellent ball movement found 
perimeter shooters PAdilla, Travieso, and Clarke open, and accurate.

After about 10 minutes, the game really was not close.  It would appear
that Bruiser has decided the 6 or 7 man rotation with 3 guards will 
be the formula until it doesn't work.

A good coach uses what he has - and Bruiser is starting to redeem
himself in my eyes.
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
77.2778UMass looking like one of the top teams in the countryTNPUBS::NAZZAROBring back Coach Cal!Mon Jan 27 1997 14:3217
    I agree completely about Bruiser.  He's found a seven or eight man
    roatation, and he's going to stick with it, and that's fine with me.
    He came up with a great game plan against Temple - penetrate and dish,
    feed the ball inside and dish.  Temple collapses, and the wing men got
    great looks all day.  Charlton Clarke had his best game ever - 5-5 from
    the field (including 3 3pointers), 4-4 from the line, and 12 assists!
    Travieso had 8 threes, and Padilla had four.  Ketner was solid
    underneath, Weeks had a career high 18 rebounds, and Norville, Basit
    and Smith gave Bruiser solid minutes off the bench.
    
    Tough week coming up - at GW Thursday and home for Xavier on Saturday,
    but with this turnaround I can see UMass winning both games.  The NCAA
    tournament looks more and more like a reality, and a 6th A-10 title is
    not out of the question.  And two weeks ago, I was ready to slit my
    throat after the Va. Tech debacle.
    
    NAZZ
77.2779IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Jan 27 1997 14:543
    
    Time to change the p-name, Nazz...
    
77.2780Thanks for noticing!TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Tue Jan 28 1997 12:503
    You're right!  Notice the new one.
    
    NAZZ
77.2781New England weather has nothing on you UMass fansMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteTue Jan 28 1997 13:571
    
77.2782Final score: UMass 67, GW 59TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Wed Jan 29 1997 16:598
    HUGE game tomorrow night vs George Washington and the hated chrome-dome
    Mike Jarvis.  GW starts three Russkies, so it really comes down to a
    cold war battle of our American and Puerto Rican boys against those
    lawless commies.  Three cheers for the red, white, and blue as the
    UMass baskeball team restores some USA pride and fights back the
    godlass aggressors from Europe.
    
    NAZZ
77.2783Kept GW in the GameGLRMAI::WILKESFri Jan 31 1997 12:012
    UMass is looking a lot better but Flint should devote a significant
    segment of each practice to foul shooting
77.2784good showHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownFri Jan 31 1997 13:016
Good win for them Minutemen lasted night.

They started slow but kept at it. Very entertaining as they were watcha
call the dogs.

TTom
77.2785WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Fri Jan 31 1997 13:447
    
    Congrats to UMass, but not even counting last night...
    
    What is GWU's problem?  I haven't seen much play by them this
    year, but I was expecting big things.
    
    - Sean
77.2786Xavier tomorrow - six in a row!TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Fri Jan 31 1997 14:2111
    That's five wins in a row for the Minutemen, with another tough game
    tomorrow afternoon at 2:00 on ABC, at the Mullins Center vs Xavier.
    I'll be there, as will the students, as intersession is finally over. 
    The Mullins Center sounds a lot louder with all the students there.
    
    As for last night, that was the worst-played game of the five wins, but  
    it was great to see the team maintain their poise when they fell down
    by ten, and come back to win.  It was especially good beating that big
    ol' chrome-dome idiot Mike Jarvis.
    
    NAZZ
77.2787One Upping CalipariNETRIX::&quot;bill.troy@pko.mts.dec.com&quot;Fri Jan 31 1997 23:1117
Certainly UMASS played well enough to win last night - but the
key thing IMHO was the grit to win.  Below summarizes well two odd
GW curse elements ruined last night.

"First-year coach Bruiser Flint stepped free from the imposing image 
of his predecessor, John Calipari, for whom GW was an almost 
unsolvable menace. Flint now has led his team to road victories 
over rivals Temple and GW in the same season -- something that 
even Calipari, for all his gaudy success, never accomplished.

And sophomore center Lari Ketner emerged from the burden of 
following National Player of the Year Marcus Camby in the UMass 
post. Ketner did what Camby was unable to do, outplaying
GW's burly center Alexander Koul." (excerpted from Hampshire Gazette)


[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
77.2788Some Chronic Problems that Need to be Ironed OutGLRMAI::WILKESMon Feb 03 1997 11:576
    As I said in .2783 Bruiser needs to devote some practice time to foul
    shooting. The Xavier game was lost at the foul line in the last minute
    of regulation.
    
    Also how can Inus Norville have palyed for three seasons and still
    commit so many stupid fouls?
77.2789No consistency = bad officiating = UMass lossTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Mon Feb 03 1997 16:1916
    The Xavier game was horrendously officiated, to be sure.  Having the
    opposition go to the line 44 times to your 19 and fouling out three of
    your players is a bit much.  So much for the home court advantage!  The
    reds continuously called ticky-tack fouls at one end while only
    occasionally making the same call at the other end.  There was simply
    no consistency.  Basit still hasn't touched the guy in the lane at the
    end of regulation, and Padilla's reach-in still comes up 3 inches short
    of touching the guy when the bald ref fouled him out.  
    
    But if Padilla makes the 1+1 up three with under a minute to play, or 
    Clarke makes both free throws instead of just one with 20 seconds to play, 
    UMass wins.  It was a shame to waste the incredible shooting
    performance Carmelo Travieso put on - 8 of 12 on threes, half of which
    came from NBA range and beyond.
    
    NAZZ
77.2790The red menace...BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredMon Feb 03 1997 17:0317
>    <<< Note 77.2789 by TNPUBS::NAZZARO "UMass is back - watch out NCAA!" >>>
>               -< No consistency = bad officiating = UMass loss >-
>
>    The Xavier game was horrendously officiated, to be sure.  Having the
>    opposition go to the line 44 times to your 19 and fouling out three of
>    your players is a bit much.  So much for the home court advantage!  The
>    reds continuously called ticky-tack fouls at one end while only
>    ^^^^
>    occasionally making the same call at the other end.  
>
>    ...    
>    NAZZ


	A communist conspiracy???

	Kevin
77.2791no pun intendedMKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationMon Feb 03 1997 18:235
    Looks like it'll be me and the youngin who make the trek
    to UMASS Thursday.  The wifey is still on the rebound.
    
    
    billl
77.2792Her annual visitTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Mon Feb 03 1997 18:284
    I'm takin' my wifey up on Thursday, too!  Must be mother's day at
    the Mullins Center!
    
    NAZZ
77.2793sec L row 16 seats 9,10MKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationMon Feb 03 1997 18:324
    Where ya sittin' Nazz?  I gots two tix off da ninj.
    
    
    billl
77.2794I'll be sure to come over and say hiTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Tue Feb 04 1997 16:384
    I'm in Section Q, Row 26, seats 5&6.  We're in the same part of
    the gym - I'm behind the visitor's bench and you're near the band.
    
    NAZZ
77.2795Ticket Prices at the Mullins center?GLRMAI::WILKESWed Feb 05 1997 13:477
    What is the price of tickets to a game at the Mullins Center?
    
    Is there a different price for students? My daughter goes to college in
    Northhampton and was interested in going to a game at UMass before the
    end of the season. A friend of hers who goes to UMass told her the
    tickets were $18.  I thought that was kind of high if it was the price
    for student tickets.
77.2796MKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationWed Feb 05 1997 15:506
    Like I said, I got mine from da ninj (aka John Hendry) who I
    believe is a season ticket holder.  The face value of the
    tix are $18.  Not sure if there is a student discount.
    
    
    billl
77.2797MKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationWed Feb 05 1997 15:5410
    >I'm behind the visitor's bench and you're near the band.
    
    Great!  I hope it isn't like the seats I had for the BC-Navy
    game this past fall, row behind the band.  Saw little to none
    of the first quarter.  Moved to some vacant seats high above
    the end zone, great seats, for the rest of the game.
    
    
    billl
    
77.2798Students get in free with an IDTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Wed Feb 05 1997 16:168
    Billl - they're good seats, not directly behind the band.
    
    The students get in for free, providing they show their ID at the
    ticket window.  It's not like the old days at the Cage, where they had
    general admission seating.  You show your ID and they give you a
    ticket.
    
    NAZZ
77.2799MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Feb 05 1997 17:2319
    > It's not like the old days at the Cage
    
    Went to one of those in 1964 for BC - UMass.  We had a kid named Rick
    Adelman from Natick who had a great game but it was quite a zoo.
    
    The old Northeastern Cage would do for starters.  
    
    The worst thing that's happened to college basketball is the coach's
    rule about charging.  We always had charging which essentially meant
    you had to have control and not put your head down and "charge".  Then
    Dean and other cuties started having players not even guarding go stand
    where a player would land and they tried to say "offense has one step
    and right to land" and now some refs and conf.'s call it one way and
    big east etc call it another way.
    
    It ruins the game.  They should take everything to do with rules
    completely away from the coaches and let real objective basketball
    people restate the interpretations and retrain the officials and make
    the game as entertaining as it was pre 1977.
77.2800Any Recruiting Info?GLRMAI::WILKESMon Feb 10 1997 16:463
    Now that it looks like former BC recruit Johnathan DePina is committing
    to UMass to rejoin his former Soth Boston team mate Monty Mack does
    anyone know what other recruits UMass has a good chance of landing?
77.2801Weeks' availability changes recruiting focusTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Mon Feb 10 1997 18:2914
    According to my buddy Russ Schott, UMass is close to landing a Top 100
    prospect from Philly, 6-3 SG Chuckie Moore.  Sounds a bit like Travieso
    in that he supposedly has umlimited range on his jumper and is an
    excellent defender.  They are also in the running for two 6-9 PFs, both
    at prep schools in CT, Ronnell Blizzard and Eric Williams.  If Weeks
    stays for an additional year, there is less need for a PF, but I would
    still sign one and perhaps redshirt him.
    
    Right now, UMass has only 11 players on scholarship, so even if Weeks
    stays, they can sign two more kids in addition to Cruz and DePina.
    
    NAZZ
    
    
77.2802SALEM::BALL_KMon Feb 10 1997 19:482
    it was also mentioned that Depina's signing makes the other BC reject
    (tyler  6-10) a UMASS possibility, because the two are good friends
77.2803BIGQ::MCKAYTue Feb 11 1997 11:353
    Why is Weeks staying in question?   
    
    Jimbo
77.2804It's at his option, as long as he graduatesTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Tue Feb 11 1997 12:306
    He may not want to.  He could play in Europe or the CBA.  In order to
    play next year, he'd have to be on time to graduate this year, and be
    enrolled in a graduate program next year.  Who knows - he may want to
    backpack around Europe for a semester or sumpin'.
    
    NAZZ
77.2805"UMASS inside the bubble for NCAA?"AKOCOA::TROYWed Feb 12 1997 16:1714
    
    UMASS is being viewed as "inside the bubble" for NCAA tournament in
    ESPN Sportszone web site.  This is for first time this calendar year.
    
    URL is:
    
    http://espnet.sportszone.com/editors/ncb/features/970210blueribbon.html
    
    Net of article is that possibly 5 A10 teams may make tourney, but URI
    on outside looking in as things stand now.
    
    Bill
    IMHO - Charlton Clark needs to get out of his current funk - really
    played like his head not into the game last night.  
77.2806Terps vs UMASSODIXIE::ZOGRANTerps rising like a Phoenix!Fri Feb 14 1997 17:536
    Terps visit UMASS in Worcester tommorrow.  They beat Free Shoes U
    last night, so this is a rather quick turnaround time.
    
    What's the press saying about the game?
    
    UMDan 
77.2807good luckHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownFri Feb 14 1997 17:555
re: Terps vs FSU

And not much of a game, to boot.

TTom
77.2808Should be a close gameWMOIS::SCHOTTFri Feb 14 1997 18:2712
         Basically the press is saying that the Maryland game is very
    important to UMass' NCAA chances.  Eighteen wins should get UMass in.
    They now stand at 15 and 10 with five games remaining (9-1 in their
    last 10)  They have a very poor record against ranked or formerly
    ranked teams this year, but most of those games were played while they
    had one or more starters out with injuries.
    
         The Maryland forwards, Booth and Profit, have a distinct quickness
    advantage over Weeks and Clarke, and UMass has been hurt by good, quick
    forwards all season.
    
    Russ
77.2809watch for EkezieHBAHBA::HAASCome on down, Gilbert BrownFri Feb 14 1997 18:295
Obinna Ekezie could be one of the keys. He's really coming into his own
and is getting a lot of kudos for his development. And he's only a
Sophomore.

TTom
77.2810Go TerpsODIXIE::ZOGRANTerps rising like a Phoenix!Fri Feb 14 1997 18:519
    Obinna had a good game in a loss against WF (Vitale almost creamed
    himself after one move in particular).  He'll be a good senior if he
    hangs in there.  If he stays out of foul trouble he can be a force.  

    The Terps have a tendency to let a team go on a 14 or 15 - 0 tear,
    particularly right after the half.  If they make their FT's they can
    hang with just about anybody.

    UMDan
77.2811UMass will continue to rollTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Fri Feb 14 1997 18:587
    I can't see Maryland having anyone to stay with Weeks down low.  Ketner
    and Ekezie should neutralize each other.  Travieso will do a good job
    defensively on Stokes - he held Shandue McNeil to 1-12 shooting for St.
    Bonaventure Tuesday night.  If Padilla plays smart (as he seems to do
    only every other game), UMass should win rather easily.
    
    NAZZ
77.2812UMass win has to be an upsetMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteFri Feb 14 1997 19:1510
    > [If...] UMass should win rather easily.
    
    You say a lot of incredible things, sometimes in jest but this sure did
    strike me.  Isn't this the team that beat Wake Forest?  Or should have.
    
    The ACC seems to be way ahead of every conference and as I recall
    Virginia, a doormat, beat UMass earlier (albeit not the same
    Minutemen).
    
    Ttom, do you have a line here.  I'd think the Terp's'd be favored.
77.2813Oh Beautiful Hindsight!YIELD::BARBIERIMon Feb 17 1997 11:099
      re: -2
    
        Great prediction!
    
      re: -1
     
        BAD prediction!   ;-)
    
    						Tony
77.2814Sour grapes - me?ODIXIE::ZOGRANTerps rising like a Phoenix!Mon Feb 17 1997 11:4211
    Who would have figured two sets of Clemson refs this weekend - at UMASS
    and at Wake.  Maybe they'll call a couple of fouls next time a MD
    player goes into the paint, sure didn't see it on Saturday.

    Oh well, a meaningless loss in the middle of the ACC schedule (who
    scheduled this one anyway?).

    No way MD loses to UMASS in the NCAA's if they meet up.


    UMDan
77.2815Charly Deal couldn't have saved you DanMKOTS3::BREENSans DouteMon Feb 17 1997 12:2114
    Well Nazz sure was right about that game.  I watched a little and it
    was no contest.  The game was lost because UMass moved the ball around
    so well.  The refs let them battle under the boards and the team that
    wanted it the most won the battles.
    
    UMass shouldn't be so careless with the big leads.  Maryland didn't
    have an answer but someone else might.  I didn't know how they would do
    it but somehow I thought UMass would come around even in the depths of
    the Fresno state massacre (when in those days there was no, NADA, ball
    movement).
    
    And as in the Fresno state game where the referees made a yeoman effort
    to help UMass as much as possible and in vain, Saturday no effort from
    the refs could have helped Maryland.
77.2816No whistles on TravelingGLRMAI::WILKESMon Feb 17 1997 13:083
    Actually the Refs did try to help Maryland. They let the Maryland big
    men get away with grotesque traveling violations in the paint on
    several occasions.
77.2817Bottom line is obvious: UMass > MarylandTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Mon Feb 17 1997 17:168
    As I noted last week, Maryland has severe matchup problems against
    UMass, and Ketner certainly took advantage of Ekezie.  A classic
    mismatch.  While Maryland fans can argue that Ketner and Clarke would
    not play to such a high level if the teams were to meet again, UMass
    could rightly expect better games from Weeks and Edgar (1-9 from the
    field) Padilla.
    
    NAZZ
77.2818It's Charlie DiehlNETRIX::&quot;troy2@pko.dec.com&quot;Bill TroyTue Feb 18 1997 21:063
 I think you are referring to that hater of jack lehman - 
Charlie Diehl, who absolutely gave every UMASS call to the other team, right?
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
77.2819What's left on our plate?COPS01::MARTINWed Feb 19 1997 11:487
    Can someone post here the remaining schedule for the Minutemen ?
    
    It's hard to follow the team down here in Maryland.
    
    Thanks
    
    Thomas Martin  (Class of '75)
77.2820the rest of the scheduleMOVMON::DAVISWed Feb 19 1997 19:295
    Feb 20  Fordham  7:00
    Feb 23  at Dayton  2:00
    Feb 25  at St. Joseph's  9:30
    Mar  1  Temple  2:00
    Mar 5-8  A10 Tournament CoreStates Spectrum in Philadelphia
77.2821Follow the Minutemen on TVTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Thu Feb 20 1997 14:404
    The St. Joe's game is on ESPN2 at 9:30; the Temple game is on ABC at
    2:00.
    
    NAZZ
77.2822Weeks last year?GLRMAI::WILKESThu Feb 20 1997 16:148
    In the Globe a couple of days ago there was an article about Tyrone
    Weeks. Amongst other things it mentioned that he had never dunked the
    ball in a UMass game. He said he might go for a dunk on Senior Day       
    ( against Temple ).
    
    Can one read between the lines that he is not planning to come back
    next year? 
    
77.2823Weeks has a lot to considerTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Thu Feb 20 1997 18:1110
    I doubt he's made a decision on that yet.  The ruling that he could
    have another year of eligibility just came down a couple of weeks ago.
    I don't think he's NBA material, but Weeks could probably play in
    Europe or South America if he wanted to.  He's doing well in school,
    and is scheduled to graduate in June, which would qualify him for the
    extra season eligibility, but does he want to go to grad school?  I
    think he and Bruiser will sit down after the season and decide what's
    best for Weeks.
    
    NAZZ
77.2824What about those bad feet he had?MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteThu Feb 20 1997 18:301
    
77.2825Ankle sprain early this season not related to other injuryTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Thu Feb 20 1997 18:384
    Better this season.  Hasn't had to take a shot for pain like he did
    last year.
    
    NAZZ
77.2826Back on the BubbleGLRMAI::WILKESWed Feb 26 1997 14:0412
    Very disappointing performance by the UMass seniors during crunch-time
    against St. Joes
    
    Midway thru the second half when UMass had cut the St. Joes lead to one
    the UMass seniors fell apart. Both Padilla and Travieso missed the
    front end on of 1 nad 1's. Padilla threw a terrible pass to Travieso
    that went out of bounds. Weeks stumble out of bounds with a defensive
    rebound and then committed a really stupid illegal pick foul in the
    backcourt.
    
    Coupled with the Dayton loss UMass has put themselves right back on the
    Tourney bubble. A win on Saturday against Temple now seems critical.
77.2827Temple game Saturday is now a must winTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Wed Feb 26 1997 14:1216
    Padilla continues to disappoint.  When is he gonna learn he's not the
    man from the 3-point line?  When is he gonna start to make some good
    decisions down the stretch?  
    
    Weeks may have been trying too hard - this was his worst game of the season.
    
    Why did Padilla decide to stop going to Ketner down low?  He simply
    owned anyone who tried to guard him.  I know they doubleteamed him a
    lot, even without the ball, but you can't completely go away from him
    the way he was scoring at will.
    
    And won't it be nice to see UMass make some free throws down the
    stretch?  Padilla 0-3, Travieso 1-3, Clarke 1-2, Weeks 1-2.  That won't
    get it done in the NCAAs.
    
    NAZZ
77.2828MKOTS3::BREENSans DouteWed Feb 26 1997 15:103
    Getting your star guards to go inside to start an inside out offense is
    the biggest challenge of coachs these days.  Big problem at UMass
    earlier.  With the 3 the ball has to go inside first to be effective.
77.2829PECAD8::CHILDSSI Swimsuit Issue Contest Winner!!Wed Feb 26 1997 15:535
thank you coach Breen for that interesting insight.....

;^)

what's it going to cost me for pointers on my golf game??????
77.2830Temple will be ready for UMass on SaturdayTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Wed Feb 26 1997 17:167
    Anyone who watched that game saw that Ketner could score at will
    inside.  Why Padilla decided he should be heaving up 3-pointers instead
    of working the ball back inside or swinging around to Clarke on the
    weak side is a mystery to me.  Padilla was 1-6 in 3's last night.
    Ketner was 9-11 from the field, I believe.
    
    NAZZ
77.2831NO Bye in round oneCOPS02::MARTINWed Mar 05 1997 12:464
    Can  anyone out there tell me why George Washington is getting a first 
    round bye in the A10 tournament and UMASS has to play?????
    
    Thomas
77.2832Because of the Conference RulesGLRMAI::WILKESWed Mar 05 1997 13:038
    The first round byes go to the first two teams in each Division
    regardless of record.
    
    In the Big 12 they do it differently. There the two first place teams
    get byes and the remaining two byes go to the two teams with the best
    conference records regardless of Division. Thus this year three teams
    from the North ( Kansas, Colorado, Iowa State ) got byes while only one
    from the South ( Texas ) did.
77.28331st and 2nd?HBAHBA::HAASstill not dead yetWed Mar 05 1997 13:045
It looks like the firsted and seconded place teams in each division get a
bye. So Xavier and GeeDub represent the West and St. Joe's and Rhode
Island are from the East. All of 'em get to sit out a game.

TTom
77.2834NOTES COLLISION!~HBAHBA::HAASstill not dead yetWed Mar 05 1997 13:040
77.2835That Stinks!!!!COPS02::MARTINWed Mar 05 1997 13:325
    Thanks for clearing that up for me.  That really really stinks though.
    It seems that the four teams with the best conference records should
    get the byes.
    
    Thomas
77.2836BIGQ::MCKAYWed Mar 05 1997 14:039
    you can argue both ways.  top two from each division get in because
    you don't play the out of division teams as many times as you do within
    your division.  top four overall get the bye because one division is
    much stronger than the other.  
    
    Big East takes top 3, I don't know if they could all be from one
    division or not. It may be two winners and the next best record.....
    
    Jimbo
77.2837as opposed to the other kind like meMKOTS3::BREENWhen the warships come back to ManilaWed Mar 05 1997 14:0710
    Then what's the point of splitting the divisions?  Don't they play
    their own division more so they get to decide that fate?  If UMass
    doesn't like it then they should have beaten Dayton.
    
    It's not the four games to win the conf champ. but what those four
    games could do to a team come the ncaas and the always tough first
    game.  I've always suspected that O'Brien of BC was glad to get blown
    out by Georgetown early in '94 so he could prepare for the ncaas where
    he won three and saved his job, much to the frustration of my b-i-l,
    one of those baldeagles Nazz loves to hate.
77.2838UMass is playing a prelim game on meritTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Wed Mar 05 1997 14:1415
    I agree that UMass has no one but themselves to blam (tm) for having to
    play in the prelims tonight.  I have no problem with the top two seeds
    from each region getting the bye.  In fact, I'm more concerned about
    tonight's game vs LaSalle than tomorrow against GW.  This is LaSalle's
    home court, they're still pissed about losing Ketner to UMass, and an
    upset of UMass would make their season.  I look for a low-scoring tight
    game, with UMass prevailing 55-50.
    
    As for Jim O'Brien, I can't understand why so many BC alums dislike
    this guy.  He's got maroon and gold running through his veins, being
    loyal to a fault to the school.  He does a nice job with less talent
    than most of the other BE schools.  What do these bald eagles expect, a
    national title?
    
    NAZZ
77.2839Fighting an uphill battleIMINMK::SILVESTRIPenuts Gang turns 10 in 1997!Wed Mar 05 1997 14:4119
>>    As for Jim O'Brien, I can't understand why so many BC alums dislike
>>    this guy.  He's got maroon and gold running through his veins, being
>>    loyal to a fault to the school.  He does a nice job with less talent
>>    than most of the other BE schools.  What do these bald eagles expect, a
>>    national title?
    
	Here is one Eagle alum that likes Jim O'Brien ... I have always
	thought of him as an excellent PERSON and a very good coach ...

	The only thing about Jim that I ever questioned was his
	recruiting ... but it has become obvious in the light of
	recent events, that he has been forced to recruit "with one
	hand tied behind his back" ... he has had to pay for the
	sins of previous administrations ... and he cannot be
	blamed for that ... I like Jim, hope he continues at BC,
	and hope that someday the athletic directors let him have
	more control ...

	Vinny
77.2840Some past problems were O'Brien recruitsGLRMAI::WILKESWed Mar 05 1997 14:499
    I like Jim O'Brien also but some of the prior questionable recruits that
    probably led to this year's admission fiasco happened on his watch.
    
    For example, Mike Herren, Chris Herren and to some extent Scoonie Penn.
    ( Scoonie Penn's academic struggle may have been fresh in Mahoney's
    mind when he ruled against DePina and Tyler )
    
    My opinion has been that Mahoney should have taken DePina but was right
    in rejecting Tyler.                                   
77.2841Reactionary management - sound familiar?IMINMK::SILVESTRIPenuts Gang turns 10 in 1997!Wed Mar 05 1997 15:5127
	I don't deny that O'Brien has a had a few recruits turn 
	sour on him, but he has had nothing like the Martin Clark -
	Jay Murphy fiasco that Gary Williams had, and he hasn't had
	any gambling problems (like the 70's hoop squad or last years
	football squad) ...

	My take on this is that BC had to cleanup the mess Gary Williams
	left behind ... so they really tightened up on who they would
	recruit ... not even thinking about accepting any "questionable"
	students ... so the basketball program suffered ... but O'Brien
	showed that he could coach, doing more with less ... finally, the
	powers that be start relaxing a little, and O'Brien is allowed
	to sign guys like Herren and Penn ... 

	Then the football scandle hits, and once again BC is back in the
	national spotlight for a scandle ... the administration reacts
	by denying admissions to "questionable" basketball recruits ...
	once more, O'Brien gets penalized for someone elses mistake ...

	Boston College wants to be like Notre Dame in football and 
	Duke in basketball ... they want the big time recruits on the
	field of play who can also pull down respectable grades in
	the classroom ... unfortunately, their aren't that many student
	athlets around who can pull off this double/double ... and the 
	ones that are out there aren't making BC their number one choice ... 

	Vinny
77.2842MKOTS3::BREENThose dear heartsWed Mar 05 1997 16:1415
    Maglos, the kid from Greece is another which ironically turned out
    roses for O'Brien when Maglos became a successful student, is another.
    Here Jim bypassed Mahoney and the latter allegedly wanted revenge and
    got it.
    
    This turned around on Mahoney when (Lynch?) the new president hardly
    sat down before he had a horde of influential, angry alumni at his
    doorstep.  He subsequently took absolute power away from Mahoney on
    admissions.  Where Gladchuk was in all this is guesswork but one would
    guess that what's bad for O'Brien is good for Chet and if Jim had
    resigned (rightly) Chet wouldn't have cried long.
    
    And Holy Cross is now putting back scholarships and may want to get
    back to big time basketball themselves.  A perfect place for the next
    John Calipari.
77.2843PECAD8::CHILDSWed Mar 05 1997 18:395
 Big East gives the two division winners a bye as well as the team with the
 bested conference record after the two division leaders have been decided.
 OBrien seems to do better with lesser talent which seems to be pretty
 prevelent amoungst the Big East coaches......
77.28442West plays 3East tonight; what about tomorrow?TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Thu Mar 06 1997 12:346
    Easy win for UMass last night.  I expect they won't have too much
    trouble with GW tonight.  What I don't know is who they will face 
    if the do indeed smack that chrome-dome idiot around tonight.  I
    am a simple soul; I cain't follow the A-10 bracket.
    
    NAZZ
77.2845all right, so the guy's head is shiny...IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Thu Mar 06 1997 12:447
    
    What is it about Mike Jarvis that irks you so, Nazz?  I met him a 
    long, long time back, when he was coach at Cambridge Rindge & Latin.
    He seemed like a reasonable enough guy.  And I was prepared to
    dislike him because his squad (with Patrick Ewing) was constantly
    giving pants-down spankings to our school's team (Waltham).
    
77.2846WONDER::SEANSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Thu Mar 06 1997 14:233
    
    I think Jarvis is a class-act, too.
    
77.2847He has grated on me for a lot of years.TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Thu Mar 06 1997 14:2815
    I liked him at C R&L.  But the more he got used to the power that comes
    with being a big-time coach, the more he liked it.  I wrote for Eastern
    Basketball magazine for several years, and covered BU while both Jarvis
    and Pitino were there.  In fact, an extensive interview with Pitino was
    my first by-line piece for the mag.  Anyway, I found Jarvis often told
    the press one thing but meant another.  Ed Carpenter, the BU AD, was
    forced to clarify something Mike said on more than one occasion.  ALso,
    Jarvis really disliked coaching in the shadow of Pitino.  He resented
    Pitino's success, and figured he was ready to coach at the next level.
    He and Calhoun had a couple of great pi**ing contests.  Hard to know 
    which one to root for, although I must say that away from the
    basketball court Jim Calhoun is a really nice guy.  Can't say the same
    thing about Jarvis.
    
    NAZZ
77.2848A real stinker last nightGLRMAI::WILKESFri Mar 07 1997 11:5018
    Horrible second half performance by UMass last night. I can't think of
    a single player who played well in the second half. Just as in the
    second St. Joseph's game UMass started downhill midway through the
    second half when Travieso bricked the front end of a one-and-one when
    UMass trailed by only one. This was immediately followed by a
    fundamental no-no Winston Smith "saving" a ball on the defensive end
    line which was going to be out of bounds off of GW anyway. His pass to
    Ketner led to a travleing call on Ketner and then a 3-pointer by
    Mersherikov and UMass was on their way to being toast.
    
    UMass is squarely on the bubble again now that they have been outlasted
    in the A-10 Tourney by Temple and URI. They better hope that GW doesn't
    win the A-10. They should also hope that Texas is routed by Missouri in
    the Big 12 Tourney.
    
    Several of the UMass players enhanced their chances of a professional career
    with the Washington Generals by repeatedly stepping into the lane
    early on Alexander Khoul foul shots.
77.2849Too many passive guys, not enough fireTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Fri Mar 07 1997 12:2313
    It was yet another in a series of lifeless performances by UMass this
    year.  It's clear to me that what this team lacks more than anything
    else is a fiery presence.  There is no one willing to step up and lead
    this team.  It is not in the nature of either Weeks or Travieso, and
    Padilla appears incapable of doing it.  THis is the one area where they
    really miss a guy like Lou Roe.  He may turn out to be nothing as a
    pro, but he was a tremendous college player who knew how to motivate
    himself and his team.  And last year Marcus Camby stepped up into Roe's
    shoes to be the kind of emotional leader the team needs.  No one did
    that this year, and that's the difference between 19-13 and 25-7, which
    is what their record should be.
    
    NAZZ
77.2850what's with the guards?HBAHBA::HAASstill not dead yetFri Mar 07 1997 12:379
Nazz,

I was watching this game with a buddy who made a pointed observation that
he thought it looked like the UMass guards don't like each other. Is
there anything to this?

Put UMass down a rung to WVU, Syracuse, et.al., e bubblius unum, amen.

TTom
77.2851GLRMAI::WILKESFri Mar 07 1997 13:065
    re: 2849
    
    The one guy who may provide some fire in the future is Basit. But right
    now he it too inexperienced and flaky to ignite the current team when
    it is in the doldrums.
77.2852Dreaming of yesteryearMKOTS3::BREENThose dear heartsFri Mar 07 1997 13:194
    Playing four NIT games might be the best thing for UMass.  I've seen it
    before.  NIT can be a catalyst to the next years NCAA.  Too bad they
    can't get 8 teams in for two doubleheaders on Saturday prior to Mon-Wed
    semifinal/final.
77.2853Padilla has been disappointingTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Fri Mar 07 1997 14:035
    I haven't heard of any bad blood between them.  I think it's more tired
    blood, especially for Padilla, who has played over 100 games since the
    end of last season.  He simply isn't the same player he was last year.
    
    NAZZ
77.2854A little rest from an early A-10 ExitGLRMAI::WILKESFri Mar 07 1997 14:303
    If they do make to the NCAA's perhaps getting eliminated early from the
    A-10 may be a blessing in disguise by providing some rest.
    
77.2855some say they're inHBAHBA::HAASstill not dead yetFri Mar 07 1997 14:5917
USAToday has one of its usually thoughtless ditties, today.

It's their lastest opinion of who will make it into the field of 64. It
was apparently written on the way to work yesterday. None of the well
thougth through efforts we have such as Nazz and Rich Rollins.

In any case, they have UNC-Charlotte as out of the field. Uh, din't they
beat Louisville yesterday? They're in.

They don't vote on Syracuse vs West Virginia apparently still waiting to
flip a coin I guess. They have 'em listed sort like one of 'em will be a
#10 seed and play Rhode Island.

I don't know if'n you should be glad or sad but UMass was in as a #10
seed in the East, opined to be playing Iowa St.

TTom
77.2856Been in the East four of five yearsTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Fri Mar 07 1997 16:244
    If'n that worked out, and UMass got to play Iowa State in the East
    regional, I'd be one happy alum.
    
    NAZZ
77.2857They win in a close oneAKOCOA::TROYMon Mar 10 1997 19:4111
    
    Well, we're in, by the hairs on our chinny chin chin.
    
    The question is: Which team will show up - the BC, Maryland strike
    force, or the Dayton, St. Joe's out of gases.
    
    Louisville looks to me like they are eminenetly beatable - but our
    recent lack of shooting outside worries me greatly.
    
    UM wins 66-61.
    
77.2858Tired LegsYIELD::BARBIERIMon Mar 10 1997 21:205
      A friend at work told me he heard Bob Ryan say that he thinks
      Padilla/Travieso are leg weary from all the games they have
      played over the last four years.
    
      What do you think?
77.2859WRKSYS::KNIKERHay saved and Cork beatTue Mar 11 1997 12:497
RE: Bob Ryan quote on Travieso/Padilla

Actually, he said that Padilla/Traviseo were leg weary due to all the games
they've played in the last TWO years. The implication was that their stint
with the Puerto Rican Olympic team allowed them no rest last summer.

Chris
77.2860MKOTS3::LONGTaxation without representationTue Mar 11 1997 13:047
    I guess there's a fine line between being "leg weary"
    from overplaying and loosing your touch from not 
    practicing, but I doubt Bob Ryan is the master at 
    determining which side of that line anyone is on.
    
    
    billl
77.2861Round 1WMOIS::SCHOTTFri Mar 14 1997 14:1614
         Well, I think the question for tonite is will the Dr.Jekyll UMass
    team show up, or will it be the Mr. Hyde team?  Taking it down a level,
    which Edgar Padilla will show up, the '94-'96, solid version, or the
    "on-again, off-again" '97 model?
    
         I think if Padilla can play well, Ketner stays out of foul
    trouble, and Travieso can keep Wheat somewhat under wraps, UMass will
    pull the upset.  If Mr. Hyde shows up, Louisville will win going away.
    
    Russ
    
    - Louisville's Wheat has been treated all week for recurring tendonitis
      in his shoulder.  Could be just enough, along with Carmello's "D" to
      force him into a 4 for 18 shooting night ;^)!! 
77.2862It was a great four year run for Edgar and CarmeloTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass is back - watch out NCAA!Mon Mar 17 1997 14:1715
    Sadly, UMass could have easily made the Sweet Sixteen.  The reality was
    that the same things that haunted them all year came back and bit them
    again - lack of consistent scoring, poor decision-making, and weak free
    throw shooting.  Add their poor free throw defense (Louisville made 17
    of their last 18 from the line), and it's wait 'til next year.
    
    Tyrone Weeks will decide by May 1 if he's going to come back and play
    an extra year, which he's eligible to do now after sitting out his
    freshman year, as long as he graduates, which he will.  Edgar and
    Carmelo are also on line to graduate, and Wil Hernden is on campus
    this semester, finishing up his degree.  That leaves only Donta Bright 
    and Marcus Camby as non-graduates from UMass in the Calipari era.  I'm 
    sure Camby will get his degree, but I don't know about Bright.
    
    NAZZ
77.2863CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Mar 17 1997 14:317
  Could have been worse, they didn't get knocked out by a team they should have
rolled over like Duke did.

  At least Providence is still in the tourney. Always good to see a New England
team beat up on a big southern or mid west team.

  George
77.2864"An OK season - regained some respect"AKOCOA::TROYMon Mar 17 1997 17:5910
    
    I don't think they would have made the Sweet 16.   There season
    amounted to a Bell Curve, a gradual improvement and gradual decline.
    
    Mr. Padilla really did not have a good senior season  - for whatever
    combination of reasons.  It was too bad the Ketner was such a
    non-entity out there Friday night.  Weeks played his HEART out -
    terrific effort.  I hope he decided to come back.
    
    This team is quickly becoming Bruiser's now.  
77.2865WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375Mon Mar 17 1997 18:004
    
    BU, BC, UMass gone.  I wonder if I'll actually get any NCAA 
    coverage in my Globe for the rest of the week now...
    
77.2866IMBETR::DUPREZA great face for radio...Mon Mar 17 1997 18:045
    
    Here at NQO, the number of UMass jerseys is down *drastically* from
    last year.  It must be have been warmer at this time of year last
    year or something...
    
77.2867Would've Liked A #4YIELD::BARBIERITue Mar 18 1997 17:186
      I wanted Bright's #4 from last year.
    
      Come to think of it, my only BB jersey I have is a #4.
      Sidney Moncrief - Milwaukee Bucks.
    
    						Tony
77.2868NQOS01::nqsrv635.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchInside IntelTue Mar 18 1997 19:151
Did that come with the Sidney Moncrief car buying influencer?
77.2869Sidney MoncriefYIELD::BARBIERITue Mar 18 1997 21:455
      I think it was before his car-selling days!!!
    
      I liked Sidney.
    
    					Tony
77.2870NQOS01::nqsrv431.nqo.dec.com::WorkbenchInside IntelWed Mar 19 1997 01:264
I did too.  That whole incident seemed very uncharacteristic of what we 
came to know of him.  

brews
77.2871PECAD8::CHILDSWed Mar 19 1997 11:391
too bad John Y screwed him outta being a Celtic.......
77.2872Moncrief - a classy guyTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass in 1998 - Final Four!Wed Mar 19 1997 16:0616
    I had a very nice experience with Sidney Moncrief one night after a
    Celtics-Bucks game.  Apparently the Bucks were staying over in Boston
    and flying out the next day.  Most of the team was staying at a local
    hotel, but when I left the Garden (in the pouring rain), I saw
    Moncrief.  I asked him if he knew where he wanted to go, and he said
    the Park Plaza.  My car was close by (a lot more free parking spots in
    those days), and I gave him a lift.  He was a classy guy.  We talked
    NBA a little, and I told him how much I enjoyed the Three Musketeers at
    Arkansas, and he isad that it was a lot of fun back then, or words to
    that efect.  When we got to the hotel, he thanked me and went on his
    way.
    
    He was a really great NBA player until injuries cut him down before his
    time.  He never played a full season after his 7th year in the league.
    
    NAZZ
77.2873More SidneyYIELD::BARBIERISun Mar 23 1997 12:1123
      Thanks Nazz for that story.
    
      I always felt Sidney was a classy guy myself.  He was one of 
      those guys that never won it all and that I wish had.
    
      On the court, he was so agressive as a penetrator/rebounder/etc.
      that he looked to inevitably end up with injuries.  If he had
      a better outside shot (cause it really wasn't that good), he
      would have been absolutely awesome.
    
      I read that the Lakers actually wanted to draft him instead of
      Magic, but they opted not to because they were worried he would
      get injuries.
    
      Of course, Magic was the better choice anyway.
    
      By the way, I still remember the Arkansas/Indiana State NCAA
      tournament game.  Indiana State had a huge lead and Moncrief
      was just unconscious.  I believe he was guarding Bird and scoring
      at will.  They came back strong and fell short, but man, did 
      they give Indiana State a scare!
    
    						Tony
77.2874exMSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Mar 25 1997 15:533
    
      I see Coach Cal is in the paper for making racist remarks
     towards a mexican reporter. What a class act.
77.2875btw how'd Winnacunet make out the other night?MKOTS3::BREENFrom Thurs to SundayTue Mar 25 1997 16:523
    What'd he say Tommy?  "You remind me of someone from New Hampshire"?
    
    That'd be pretty bad, eh?
77.2876What's a Winnacunet?MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Mar 25 1997 17:107
    
      >> What'd he say Tommy?  
    
         He called a reporter for a Newark newspaper a "Mexican idiot".
         It took Bay staters awhile to find out what a fake Coach Cal is.
         The folks in Jersey are finding out much quicker.
    
77.2877:-)SALEM::DODAResignation SupermanTue Mar 25 1997 18:045
Well, is he Mexican and is he an idiot?

Let's go from there....

daryll
77.2878MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Mar 25 1997 18:273
    
      He may very well be an idiot but what his being Mexican has to
     do with anything only the narrow-minded Calipari knows.
77.2879Camby beginning to dominate NBAMKOTS3::BREENFrom Thurs to SundayTue Mar 25 1997 19:063
    More apropos to this note is the performance of Marcus Camby of late in
    winning rookie of the month.  I may have understated the impact that
    Camby is going to make in that league.
77.2880CAM::WAYand keep me steadfastTue Mar 25 1997 19:0734
>    
>      He may very well be an idiot but what his being Mexican has to
>     do with anything only the narrow-minded Calipari knows.
>

Well, perhaps he wasn't so narrow-minded after all.

Consider the fact that most coaches of professional sports teams consider
almost all of the press to be blithering idiots.  Now consider the fact that
Calipari is in the heat of the moment, faced with perhaps twenty-five to
thirty-five blithering idiots.

He wants to single out one amongst the blithering idiots to feel his wrath.

If the man had a prominent mole on his cheek, Calipari might have said, 
"hey you mole-faced idiot."  If the man had buck-teeth or a pencil-neck he might
have singled him out that way.  If the blithering idiot had been a candidate
for Sy Sperling's Hair Club for Men, he might have yelled, "hey you bald-headed
blithering idiot."

If the idiot was portly, he could have yelled what I often answer to:  "Hey,
fatso"

But I'm thinking that the blithering idiot had no such prominent identifying
characteristics, and that in the heat of the moment the first thing that
Caliparri noticed was that the fellow was Mexican.


I mean, that could be what he was driving at....


Personally, I just would have gone for "dickwad" and left it at that....


77.2881It was a Top-40 record, too!TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass in 1998 - Final Four!Tue Mar 25 1997 19:174
    I myself prefer "pencil-neck geek", made famous by the former wrestling
    great Classy Freddie Blassie.
    
    NAZZ
77.2882exMSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Tue Mar 25 1997 19:278
    
    >> Now consider the fact that Calipari is in the heat of the moment, 
    >> faced with perhaps twenty-five to thirty-five blithering idiots.
    
       There wouldn't be 25 to 35 reporters at a Nets practice. There
       are probably more reporters covering a Clinton Tee Ball League
       game than a Nets practice.
          
77.2883SALEM::DODAResignation SupermanTue Mar 25 1997 19:295
I'm sure the reporter is deeply offended.

Wonder how much it'll take to make him feel better.

daryll
77.2884ALASKA::LAFOSSEWHEN THE BULLET HITS THE BONE...Wed Mar 26 1997 13:296
Now if'n he'd have kicked him in the groin, he'd have a legitimate gripe...
or maybe taken a wad of spit in the face...  Until then, I see no problem.

your mileage may vary.

Fra
77.2885MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Mar 26 1997 15:2611
    >> Now if'n he'd have kicked him in the groin, he'd have a 
    >> legitimate gripe... or maybe taken a wad of spit in the face...  
    >> Until then, I see no problem.

       So basically, you can say whatever you want no matter who it 
       offends? Apparently, neanderthal Tommy Heinsohn and some schmoe
       who does the radio broadcasts for the Miami Heat agree with you.
       It's 1997 and some folks still haven't learned that it's a world
       full of different people (except for New Hampshire of course)>

    
77.2886SALEM::DODAResignation SupermanWed Mar 26 1997 15:399
            <<< Note 77.2885 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

      > It's 1997 and some folks still haven't learned that it's a world
      > full of different people (except for New Hampshire of course)>

        And some folks haven't learned that pointing out the 
        difference is offensive.
    

77.2887MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Mar 26 1997 15:454
    
     re .2886
    
     I'm missing your meaning.
77.2888BIGQ::MCKAYWed Mar 26 1997 15:579
    I think he means someone from Clinton shouldn't be throwing stones
    at people from New Hampshire!!!!
    
    8*)
    
    I miss Marty already, you guys ran out my best source for Nebraska 
    info, hang your heads in shame.
    
    Jimbo
77.2889ALASKA::LAFOSSEWHEN THE BULLET HITS THE BONE...Wed Mar 26 1997 16:0721
Shoulda included the smiley... my mistake, was trying to be sarcastic.

can you say whatever you want with no regard for who is offended?  NO
do people do it anyway? YES

are some things people say blown way outa of proportion or distorted by the
righteous media??

Evidently, who you are and the amount of $$ you make allows certain privies,
and depending on your "added value" to a team, lots of things are condoned in
these same 1990's.

With a comparison to the kicking and spitting incident this is very minor in my
mind...  do we know what was said to cause the comment?

I remember Parcells was pretty fiesty with the media, and although he never 
made any racial comments he was abusive... However, does the media bring it upon
themselves?  I have little regard for the media, when all they care about is a
headline story, and have very little compassion for anything else.

FWIW, Fra
77.2890Coach Cal needs to work on his people skillsTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass in 1998 - Final Four!Wed Mar 26 1997 16:238
    Calipari was an insensitive idiot for making that remark.  However,
    calling for his resignation seems a bit much.  I would have liked the
    Nets to suspend him for a game without pay.  That would have sent a
    message that the Nets would not tolerate that kind of language, and
    it would have hit Coach Cal in the one place he would certainly feel it
    - his wallet.
    
    NAZZ
77.2891SALEM::DODAResignation SupermanWed Mar 26 1997 16:4211
            <<< Note 77.2887 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>

    
     re .2886
    
    > I'm missing your meaning.

     Probably because I typo'd the damn message. I meant to 
     write that "pointing out those differences isn't offensive". Is 
     your problem that he called him an idiot or that he said he was 
     Mexican?
77.2892Intolerance is intolerance...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Mar 26 1997 16:489
>     Is your problem that he called him an idiot or that he said he was 
>     Mexican?
    
    Or that Coach Cal is from New Hampshire (which he isn't, far as I 
    know)?
    
    glenn
    
77.2893MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Mar 26 1997 17:2211
    >> Is your problem that he called him an idiot or that he 
    >> said he was Mexican?
    
       Both. It's that he called him a "Mexican idiot" as if one
       has something to do with the other. They don't. If the guy 
       is an idiot the guy is an idiot regardless of what his ethnic
       background is. It's particularly disturbing because coach Cal
       is in a position of some power and he got largely on the backs 
       of african-american and hispanic kids.
      
77.2894MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Wed Mar 26 1997 17:236
    
  >> Or that Coach Cal is from New Hampshire (which he isn't, far as I 
  >> know)?
    
     This has something to do with something but I'm not sure what.    
    
77.2895Ah, never mind...EDWIN::WAUGAMANWed Mar 26 1997 17:4822
    
  >> Or that Coach Cal is from New Hampshire (which he isn't, far as I 
  >> know)?
  >  
  >   This has something to do with something but I'm not sure what.    
    
    I was just curious as to why you introduced New Hampshire to the 
    subject, when as far as I can tell none of the principals nor the 
    guy you were responding to are from New Hampshire.  Now to you,
    maybe "New Hampshire idiot" or "New Hampshire intolerant" are 
    redundancies, but others might say that in general one has nothing 
    to do with the other.
    
    Or, in other words, in condemning generalizations you couldn't pass
    up a shot at one yourself in the very same note.  Not that I'm 
    offended; I just thought it a little amusing.
    
    What would the response be, if say, Coach Cal had taken a shot at 
    NH-expatriated Breen like that?  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
77.2896Heinsohn more a victim than anyoneMKOTS3::BREENFrom Thurs to SundayWed Mar 26 1997 19:3317
    I've been called an idiot by better people than coach Cal.
    
    I think some of this racial sensitivity is going to far.  Calipari is
    hardly a rascist as I'm sure most of his former players, many black
    would attest.
    
    The Heinsohn case is the most ridiculous.  Mutombo often makes
    references to hunting lions, Heinsohn and his color had been discussing
    just that and the reference followed in context.  Along comes this
    Howard Manly, the author of the single most rascistly offensive article
    I've EVER read (and that includes the attacks on Reggie Lewis and even
    Gerry Callahan in general) on Maxwell as a color man.  Now Manly is
    black and somehow feels that he cannot then be accused of rascist
    remarks in regard to another black.  
    
    And on the radio one day the case comes up and who's defending Manly
    but Gerry Callahan, somehow an arbiter of political correctness.
77.2897MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Mar 27 1997 13:0117
    
  >> Calipari is hardly a rascist as I'm sure most of his former 
  >> players, many black would attest.
    
     He may not be a racist but he sure is ignorant. What he said
     was stupid. Personally, I don't care what his former players
     would attest. He needed them to get where he is today which
     is filthy stinking rich. If he treated them like princes it
     could just have well have been a sense of preservation as a
     sense of decency because the man is as opportunistic and 
     ambitious as they come.

  >> The Heinsohn case is the most ridiculous.  

     Heinsohn's remark was even more stupid than Calipari's
     and Halberstam's was dumber than both of them put together.
    
77.2898EDWIN::WAUGAMANThu Mar 27 1997 13:1016
                  
  >> The Heinsohn case is the most ridiculous.  
  >
  >   Heinsohn's remark was even more stupid than Calipari's
  >   and Halberstam's was dumber than both of them put together.
    
    At least from the reports, I'd go with Halberstam > Calipari >
    Heinsohn.  Halberstam saying that Thomas Jefferson's slaves would
    have made good basketball players is just way, way out there.  You
    really have to wonder about the mind process that would even 
    produce such a bizarre thought much less the inclination to use 
    it on-air.  Calipari was being derogatory.  Heinsohn wasn't
    intentionally derogatory at all, just pretty clueless.
    
    glenn
    
77.2899Distinct situations being generalizedIMINMK::SILVESTRIBC Eagles - Big East Champs!Thu Mar 27 1997 13:1820
	>> Heinsohn wasn't intentionally derogatory at all, 
	>> just pretty clueless.
    
	When I first heard the comments by Tommy Heinsohn, I thought 
	Tommy was referencing a true story when he said Dikembe was 
	going back to Africa to hunt lions ... then I realized I was 
	confusing Dikembe Mutombo with Manute Bol ... another seven 
	foot NBAer who actually did kill a lion with a spear ...    

	Calipari made a stupid statement, calling that reporter a
	'Mexican idiot', but how come noone is taking the reporter
	who called ML Carr 'an idiot' to task? Is it OK for a reporter
	to write something like that, but not OK for a coach
	to respond in kind? Or the fact that Calipari put an
	ethnic adjective in front of the remark make all the difference?

	The Miami Heat announcer was just way out there, totally
	off base with his comments ...

	Vinny
77.2900MSBCS::BRYDIEBang! Bang! Bang!Thu Mar 27 1997 13:319
	>> but how come noone is taking the reporter who called ML 
        >> Carr 'an idiot' to task? 

           The Celts are at 13-57. Who's going to argue with someone 
           calling ML Carr an idiot?

            
           
    
77.2901ML - lousy coach, OK GM = not an idiotTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass in 1998 - Final Four!Thu Mar 27 1997 13:386
    Unfortunately for him, ML is doing exactly what the front office and
    the majority of the fans want him to do - lose.  He may be a lousy
    coach, but he's been a half-decent GM, certainly much much better than
    the "when's my tee time" regime of Dave Gavitt.
    
    NAZZ
77.2902lousy coach, even worse GMGLRMAI::WILKESThu Mar 27 1997 13:578
    ML has been an awful GM, other than the Montross trade his other moves
    have been terrible such as
    
    		o signing Wilkins
    		o signing Barros to a long term contract
    		o signing Ellison
    		o signing Brickowski
    		o signing Radja to a big long term contract
77.2903Hoping this is a little clearerMKOTS3::BREENFrom Thurs to SundayThu Mar 27 1997 14:1016
    I suppose the fine distinction between "Mexican" and the usual Latin
    American slur has to be considered irrelevant.  And as far as Joe's
    distinction of whether Mutombo ever actually killed a lion with his
    bare hands or Manute did with a spear I get the point, those references
    along with Halberstam's Jeffersonian basketball team are offensive.
    
    And stubbornly I do get it: By stomping out these brush fires of
    offensiveness we build a fire-break to the true, loathsome ethnic
    pogroms of Eastern Europe.  But let's not make a game of it like Holley
    of the Glove did.
    
    And Tommy gets right to the ultimate point of it with Calipari and his
    getting rich thru the efforts of Camby, Bright and (Nazz would have to
    help me) and earlier black stars.  A dearheart if there ever was one.
    Perhaps I'll rephrase: Calipari was certainly no typical rascist since
    he was willing to sacrifice it, if it existed, to get rich.  Better?
77.2904A lot of positives to go with the negativesTNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass in 1998 - Final Four!Thu Mar 27 1997 16:1931
    ML Carr was named Director of Basketball Operations on June 14, 1994. 
    Here is what he has done in that capacity.  You be the judge:
    
    - 6/29/94: Drafted Eric Montross and Andrei Fetisov.  Traded Ed Pinckney 
    and the rights to Andrei Fetisov for Blue Edwards and Dreek Strong.
    - 7/22/94:  Signed David Wesley as a free agent.
    - 7/25/94:  Signed Dominique Wilkins as a free agent.
    - 8/1/94:  Signed Pervis Ellison as a free agent.
    - 8/4/94:  Unrestricted free agent Robert Parish signed with Charlotte.
    - 9/12/94:  Celtics set up first strength and conditioning camp in
    Tampa.
    - 9/7/94:  Unrestricted free agent Kevin Gamble signed with Miami.
    - 10/19/94:  Signed Greg Minor as a free agent.
    - 2/3/95:  Traded Blue Edwards to Jazz for Jay Humphries and 2nd round
    draft choice (33rd overall - used to select Junior Burrough).
    - 6/28/95:  Drafted Eric Williams and Junior Burrough.
    - 8/12/95:  Dominique Wilkins signs a contract with a team in Greece.
    - 9/6/95:  Xavier McDaniel signs a contract with a team in Greece.
    - 9/22/95:  Dana Barros is signed as a free agent.
    - 10/26/95:  Sherman Douglas was traded to Milwaukee for Todd Day and
    Alton Lister.
    - 11/24/95:  Signed Thomas Hamilton as a free agent.
    - 6/21/96:  Traded Eric Montross and the 9th pick in the draft to
    Dallas for the 6th pick in the draft and Dallas' #1 pick in 1997.
    - 6/26/96:  Drafted Antoine Walker and Steve Hamer.  (Dallas drafted
    Samaki Walker with Boston's #1 pick.)
    - 7/1/96:  K.C. Jones maned as an assistant coach.
    - 8/1/96:  Signed Frank Brickowski as a free agent.
    
    NAZZ
    
77.2905And fired Chris FordMKOTS3::BREENFrom Thurs to SundayThu Mar 27 1997 18:251
    Aren't you leaving off the dismissal of Chris Ford.
77.2906PECAD8::CHILDSThu Mar 27 1997 18:356
which was certainly a high point. firing Ford for you without decoders today.
Besides you can't blame him for drafting Montross instead of Eddie Jones.
That had Red written all over it. He cleaned up Red's mess by getting Walker
not a bad recoup. 

mike
77.2907Guess the list wasn't complete - sorry!TNPUBS::NAZZAROUMass in 1998 - Final Four!Thu Mar 27 1997 18:4611
    Funny, firing Ford wasn't listed in the Celtics Media Guide under "This
    Date in Celtics History", but Ford's getting a contract extension was.
    Don't know how I missed the extension getting on that list.  
    
    On a second look, there is this entry for May 17, 1995:  "Chris Ford
    was released as Celtics coach."
    
    Followed by this entry on June 20, 1995:  ML Carr was appointed head
    coach."  It just doesn't say by himself!
    
    NAZZ