[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference napalm::guitar

Title:GUITARnotes - Where Every Note has Emotion
Notice:Discussion of the finer stringed instruments
Moderator:KDX200::COOPER
Created:Thu Aug 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:3280
Total number of notes:61432

1329.0. "Metaltronix Amplification (Perfect Connection)" by MARKER::BUCKLEY (I wish it was summertime all year!) Fri Jun 02 1989 19:30

    Since METALTRONIX is becoming a pretty hip comapny these days, I
    thought they deserved their own note.
    
    Lee Jackson has been doing amp mods for yeas now (primarily Marshalls),
    and has started to release his own stuff now.  
    
    There are only a few Metaltronix units available on the market now,
    but they're good, so I guess less is more.  Cureently being marketed
    is the:
    
    o GP1000 Perfect Connection preamp
    o MP1000 (?) stereo 100WT power amp (1 rack space high w/spkr
      emulation) 
    o The M1000 100WT all tube head
    o Metaltronix 4x12 cabs (Celestion equipped, of course!)
    
    I played through the GP1000 when it came out and it was nice, but
    I wanted more flexibility.  Also, the unit seemed to be a bit bassy
    to me.  I played through the M1000 head and a cab last night and
    was blown away.  They produce a thick, full tone sound rivaled by
    few other amps I've heard.  I used to think the Marshall 2205 and
    Jubille series sounded good til I heard this thing!!  I think this
    amp is more in the Kitty Hawk line of marketing...I'd love to A/B
    these two amps!  FYI, I think the M1000 blows Boogie away for a
    full sustaining lead tone!  It has 12 stages of gain in the preamp,
    and this thing SINGS!  The eq allows the amp to be beefy sounding
    yet definied without being thin.  Check it out!  
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1329.1Bass, tooAQUA::ROSTIt's the beat, the beat, the beatFri Jun 02 1989 20:423
    
    There is also a Perfect Connection bass preamp, Music Emporium has
    it in their latest catalog.
1329.2JC sez, I want the bottom line !! ;^)ASAHI::COOPERIt's just me and my ZTue Jun 06 1989 15:283
    So, how much ???
    
    jc
1329.3MARKER::BUCKLEYI wish it was summertime all year!Tue Jun 06 1989 15:434
    Lowest price quote I heard on the M1000 100WT_head_from_hell was
    $779. at Mr. C's music in Marlboro.
    
    Buck
1329.4ASAHI::COOPERIt's just me and my ZTue Jun 06 1989 15:505
    Snot bad !!  Whats the scoop with these things ?
    
    What kind of knobs does it have ?
    
    jc
1329.5what I rememberMARKER::BUCKLEYI wish it was summertime all year!Tue Jun 06 1989 16:0523
    
    The M1000 has somewhat of the following controls (don't quote me!):
    
    Gain 1  Gain 2  Sys Lvl   Bass  Mid shift    Mid   Treb   Mstr 1  
    
    + 20            main pain       5 position
    -               gain            knob with 5
                                    dif eq curves
        
    Mast 2         Pres  	

    When pulled
    acts as a
    power soak/
    attenuator for the amp.
    
    
    The knobs are active and they go from + - 20 from 0.  The Bass and
    Treb knobs pull for eq boosts and/or diff. freq/bandwith (something
    weird like that).  The head has two channels (ie masters 1 and 2),
    but they don't work like a regular two channel monster...its a weird
    beast all around, you really have to get used to it!
    
1329.6 SALEM::PARKERTue Jun 06 1989 17:057
    Kinda sounds like the set-up of a laney.
    
    
    
    
    
                   DAVE
1329.7much better sounding than LaneyMARKER::BUCKLEYI wish it was summertime all year!Tue Jun 06 1989 17:496
    re: -1
    
    Yeah, sorta, only the M1000 sounds light-years better than a Laney! I
    mean, when you boost the bass on a Metaltronix, it boosts the bass
    without drawing away from the other freq., something which doesn't
    happen on a Laney. 
1329.8ASAHI::COOPERIt's just me and my ZTue Jun 06 1989 18:058
    I trust we can switch remotely from clean to nasty (and all points
    in between ?)
    
    Sounds nasty !  I want ...
    
    ... Two !
    
    jc
1329.9MARKER::BUCKLEYI wish it was summertime all year!Tue Jun 06 1989 19:0718
    re: -1
    
    NO!  I mean, like I said it's not your average two channel amp like a
    Fender twin or something...there is no clean/dirty channel thing
    happening here.  Its sort of like a boogie in the sense that, if you
    set the amp up for the ultimate singing lead tone, your switched
    "clean" sound will not be clean, moreso fuzzy, with less distortion,
    but certainly NOT clean!  It has two master volume controls...on the
    preamp version, its for stereo separation (ie left channel master
    volume and right channel master vol.), but I am not sure how the two
    master volumes are working on the M1000 head.  I guess you could
    always call Metaltronix in LA and rap with them about it...those
    LA tech cats are pretty hip on that sort of stuff.
    
    I guess I should get more technical info on the thing.  As Paul
    Gilbert said when he opened the box on his amp(s):  "The thing has
    5 volume controls, and it took me a while to figure out what did
    what and how to get the best possible sound happening". 
1329.10FYIMARKER::BUCKLEYWhere the down boys goTue Aug 22 1989 21:025
    This is FYI for all those misc Metaltronix notes lurking about...this
    is where the official Metaltronic/Perfect Connection discussion is at. 

    
    
1329.11from the Metaltronix catalogPNO::HEISERCold Rock the Groove!Tue Aug 22 1989 22:499
M1000 - 100 watt tube head, 10 stage preamp (5 12AX7 tubes), active
        effects loop, list is $1,149
GP1000 - 6 stage tube preamp, stereo out, footswitchable, 1 rack
         space, list is $575.  BP1000 is a bass version that lists for
         $599.
SP1000 - 100 watt stereo solid state power amp, 1 rack space, 14.5
         lbs., list is $599.

Mike
1329.12PNO::HEISERCold Rock the Groove!Tue Aug 22 1989 23:134
1329.13Valve JobUSRCV1::REAUMEundergoing behavior analysisWed Aug 23 1989 16:456
      A solid state power amp doesn't need an output transformer for
    matching the output section to the speaker impedance. Tubes require
    one and this adds a lot to the weight of a tube amp. Also the main
    AC transformer in a tube amp must be larger than solid state because
    the power consumption from tubes is considerably higher and you
    need more taps off the transformer for things like filaments, etc.
1329.14what's the xfmr look like ?TCC::COOPERCaptain KRUNCH !Wed Aug 23 1989 17:279
1329.15How To Save WeightAQUA::ROSTMy mind is on vacationWed Aug 23 1989 18:074
    
    A transformer like you described in .14 is called a toroidal
    transformer. Much smaller, lighter, less EMI radiation, *much* more
    expensive. 
1329.16Boulders use toroidals alsoPNO::HEISERCold Rock the Groove!Wed Aug 23 1989 18:554
    Glad to hear the input transformer is a real one and not like the
    Carver mickey-mouse version.
    
    Mike
1329.17Not that I need one or anythingCSC32::G_HOUSEI guess I'm just a spud boyWed Aug 23 1989 21:257
    I can't believe Metaltronix is really getting that much for a head.  I
    expect that they are being heavily discounted.  Anyone know what
    they're really going for?
    
    Looks like the SP1000s are getting discounted quite heavily...
    
    Greg
1329.18MARKER::BUCKLEYWhere the down boys goThu Aug 24 1989 12:403
    The M1000 best price in the Boston area was #786.00.
    
    Not much more than a Marshall top, or a Laney for that matter.
1329.19VIDEO::BUSENBARKThu Aug 24 1989 12:482
    	Gee do they give you any 5 amp fuses for the 2 amp they installed
    in the factory?  :^) 
1329.20Thanks Buck!CSC32::G_HOUSEI guess I'm just a spud boyThu Aug 24 1989 16:386
    re: .18
    
    Definately a heavy discount as I expected.  That seems like a fairly
    realistic price.
    
    Greg
1329.21TCC::COOPERCaptain KRUNCH !Thu Aug 24 1989 19:256
    re: .19
    
    Negative.  I should charge them labor since I had to repair it myself
    too.  Sheeesh, $.35 ea for them fuses too !!!  Sheeesh !
    
    jc 
1329.22another addition to the familyUSRCV1::REAUME2#4UTue Sep 19 1989 15:0414
      I finally loaded the Metaltronix SP1000 into my Killerack. I really
    like the sound and convenience of this unit. I have to push the
    volume control on the amp quite a ways to get the sound I want,
    luckily there seems to be a lot of headroom in the upper half of
    the volume control. In other words it doesn't mush out like some
    amps do after the 12 o'clock position. Oh yeah, I agree that the
    led display is neat. 
      Esentially the are three audio components and two control components
    to my rack. Audio: Kitty Hawk Quattro pre-amp > ART SGE > SP1000.
    Control: Kitty Hawk KHPC1 foot controller and Kitty Hawk MIDI patch
    bayette. It sounds INCREDIBLE! 
      My only negative comment is that I feel my Kitty Hawk M1 100 watt
    head is louder than the Metaltronix. Not by a lot but I notice it.
    I think a lot of tube amps put out more than their rating anyway.
1329.23is it *really* 100 watts?HAZEL::STARRLGTFOOHTue Sep 19 1989 17:1313
re: -1

That's the second person (out of the three owners I know of!) that feel their 
Metaltonix does not output as much as they want or expected (Coop - you said 
you have to keep yours all they up, didn't ya?). 

It seems to me that at 100wpc, it should be loud enough for most applications. 
What's the deal here then? Is it putting out less than 100wpc? Has anyone done 
any testing on them to see what the actual output is?

Just wondering why everyone is running these things so hot....

Alan S.
1329.24ASAHI::COOPERInsert Flipper-type P-name here...Tue Sep 19 1989 18:5229
1329.25pedal to the METALtronixUSRCV1::REAUME2#4UTue Sep 19 1989 20:1415
      You are right JC-
    The unit sounds best opened up and making subtle volume changes
    using the SGE's output slider. When I let this monster go full
    guns there is no hint of annoying transistor clip- it's just
    a darn good saturated sound. That's why I bought it! The SP1000
    probably does put out 100 watts, but I think most tube amps
    put out more than they're rated.
      As far as some of the lead settings go I've come to a few conclusions
    after quite a bit of experimenting. When running the rack at regular
    volume and using any of the two lead modes in the pre-amp, it is
    pretty much useless to add in distortion or much compression on
    the SGE. The pre-amps doing a good job of that already. At lower
    volumes that advice changes. The only effects I really add to the
    leads are delay/chorus/flange and usually (but not always) very
    subtle at that.
1329.26A possibilityCANDID::stephConstants aren't. Variables don't.Tue Sep 19 1989 22:3820
Re: Does it really put out 100 watts?

You may be seeing a classic ``trick'' of specsmanship here.

The 100 watt rating is with a particular amount of distortion.

First, the distortion figures could be different from one amp to
another (whee, I get 1000 wpc out of this paperback sized amp, too bad
all I hear is noise!).

Second, the distortion curve is different for different amps. 
Different amps may provide the same amount of distortion at a given
power, but one amp might sound disgusting when producing 10% more than
its rated power, while the other still sounds fine.

Usually tube amps have a more audibly pleasing ``degradation'', so you
can crank past the rated power with no worries.  Transistor amps are
designed so that you can't get into this regime.

Just another way of say ``tube amps put out more than their ratings''.
1329.27HAZEL::STARRLGTFOOHWed Sep 20 1989 13:0815
I know you guys are defending the Metaltronix, but what you are saying is 
actually turning me away from it! Two major points I don't like:

a.) I don't like the fact that it adds color to the sound. IMO, that is what a 
    pre-amp/effects is for. A power amp should *only* provide power, and it 
    should sound the same coming out as it did going in (only louder!).

b.) I also don't like it that you have to run it all the way up before getting 
    a 'good' sound out of it. IMO, that is ridiculous! I should be able to run 
    a power amp at whatever volume I want, and it should sound the same at all
    levels.

I know you guys love'em, but it looks like its not the right answer for me.....

Alan S.
1329.28But your right, I am defending it. ;^)ASAHI::COOPERInsert Flipper-type P-name here...Wed Sep 20 1989 15:1413
    RE: Alan       "...Thats what a pre-amp is for"...
    
    Negative.  Think about it dude, what does every Marshall owner do
    to change the sound of their amps ?  Do they change the preamp tubes
    or the power tubes ?  Generally, they change the power tubes from
    like 6550's to EL34's...  The preamp and effects do change the sound, 
    butif you drive the signal with a transister radio, it'll sound
    like do-do.
    
    And... I don't *have* to run the SP1000 wide open, it just sounds
    even better that way...  ;^)
    
    jc
1329.29totally tubularUSRCV1::REAUMEthe defense restsWed Sep 20 1989 15:4817
      I played the through the SP1000 at band practice last night, WOW.
    I got some great sounds that really turned my head. As far as coloring
    the sound I don't think the Metaltronix really does that, it's more
    a matter of the way it clips. I tried my rack through a Carvin FET400
    and even though it's a great power amp for PA it doesn't do as good
    a job on the guitar. Then again this is all based on the sound your
    after! If you want a clean sound (or overdrive/dist done thru effects)
    and you don't clip the power amp then most PA power amps will do.
      I am used to tube amps and every supposed Solid State amp that
    made claims to sound just like a tube amp never really delivered.
    The combination of the KH pre-amp and SP1000 is by far the most
    realistic emulation of a all-tube head that I've heard! Add to that
    the lighter weight and convenience of rack packaging- I'm still
    sold on it. 
    
     						Perry Mason
    					(Metaltronix Defense Counsel)
1329.30PNO::HEISERhit you where you liveWed Sep 20 1989 20:3115
>                 <<< Note 1329.27 by HAZEL::STARR "LGTFOOH" >>>
>a.) I don't like the fact that it adds color to the sound. IMO, that is what a 
>    pre-amp/effects is for. A power amp should *only* provide power, and it 
>    should sound the same coming out as it did going in (only louder!).
>
>b.) I also don't like it that you have to run it all the way up before getting 
>    a 'good' sound out of it. IMO, that is ridiculous! I should be able to run 
>    a power amp at whatever volume I want, and it should sound the same at all
>    levels.

    Alan, I agree with you on both counts.  This may be due to being an
    audiophile prior to becoming a guitarphile.  I can't see why the same 
    principles in hifi/consumer audio don't apply in pro audio.
    
    Mike
1329.31I like an amp to color the soundCSC32::G_HOUSEDoes a bear wear a funny hat?Wed Sep 20 1989 22:0736
>                 <<< Note 1329.27 by HAZEL::STARR "LGTFOOH" >>>
>a.) I don't like the fact that it adds color to the sound. IMO, that is what a 
>    pre-amp/effects is for. A power amp should *only* provide power, and it 
>    should sound the same coming out as it did going in (only louder!).
    
    Ummm... I also disagree.  As John (I think) mentioned, it depends on
    what you're looking for.  If you like the sound you get from running
    effects into an ultra-clean amp, then your description fits fine.  You
    have to remember that the power amp section of most amps does color the
    sound somewhat.  A Marshall preamp into a solid state power amp
    wouldn't sound like a Marshall head (or a Marshall with the volume at 1
    won't sound like a Marshal with the volume at 10...closer to home?)
    
    I currently don't have a power amp, just run my MP-1 and SGE at
    instrument level into one or more combo amps.  I can definately hear a
    difference in the sound I get from my Crate solid state amp and my
    Hiwatt tube amp.  I set both amps up for a clean basic sound and get
    all the distortion from the rack stuff.  I like the sound through the
    Hiwatt better...
    
>b.) I also don't like it that you have to run it all the way up before getting 
>    a 'good' sound out of it. IMO, that is ridiculous! I should be able to run 
>    a power amp at whatever volume I want, and it should sound the same at all
>    levels.
    
    Woah there Nellie!  I think you're reading stuff into what they said,
    neither of them said they *had* to run the SP1000 at full volume to get
    a good sound out of it or to get the volume they needed.  They said
    that they did it that way and it colored the sound in a way they liked. 
    Personally I can see a lot of advantage to setting your power amp up
    louder then you need, then you can control your volume through your
    preamp and effects without having to mess with it further on the power
    amp.  This is pretty standard practice with PAs, you control the volume
    through the mixing board.
    
    Greg
1329.32It's a joke son...BUSY::JMINVILLEHit me with your rhythm stickThu Sep 21 1989 13:128
RE: 1329.29

>>    The combination of the KH pre-amp and SP1000 is by far the most
>>    realistic emulation of a all-tube head that I've heard!

	So why don't we all just go back to all-tube heads :^) ;^)

	joe (sorry, couldn't resist)
1329.33necessary excessUSRCV1::REAUMEtwo thousand screaming guitarsThu Sep 21 1989 14:1311
      re -.1  Where's my gun?
    
      Seriously though, some manufacturers have been giving that some
    thought. Case in point: the new Fender Super 60 amp that comes in
    combo, head, and rack mount. Dean Markley has been making rack mount
    amps(heads) for some time. A head (rack or standalone) will almost always
    be less deneros than a set of seperates (just like in audio land).
    Also tube will almost always be more bucks than solid state. Anyone see
    the price (and weight) of the new Marshall rack mount power amp?
    
                                               	John R.
1329.34MARKER::BUCKLEYbut then again, I may be more...Thu Sep 21 1989 14:3511
    Wow, miss two days of work and I miss a great conversation!
    ;^)
    
    Umm, I agree that when I tried Jeff's Metaltronix, that the sound I
    liked the best was both channel's wide open, however, when I used it
    in the studio for my leads, I only ran it 1/2 way and it still
    maintained its tone (oh yeah, its was still LOUD!).
    
    Whatever...
    
    Moi, court jester
1329.35ASAHI::COOPERInsert Flipper-type P-name here...Thu Sep 21 1989 15:0512
    Yeah, and I never had any volume trouble when I used Buck's MP1
    to preamp with.  Like I said earlier, the SGE has some presets that
    don't produce enough signal.  I bet that KH preamp sounds AWESOME!
    
    
    Metaltronix does have one serious drawback:
    
    You can't bridge it.   ;^(

    ...Not that you'll need to...  ;^)
    
    jc
1329.36AQUA::ROSTChickens don't take the day offThu Sep 21 1989 15:397
    
    Re: tube rack mounts
    
    Mesa has offered a rack mount kit for years that lets you pop the
    chassis from any Boogie combo or head and stuff it into a rack.
    
    
1329.37try FETsPNO::HEISERhit you where you liveThu Sep 21 1989 16:007
    Re: going back to tube
    
    Why not a MOSFET amp?  If I remember correctly from my school days,
    aren't tubes FETs?  Wouldn't a MOSFET amp like the Carvin bring you the
    best of both worlds?
    
    Mike
1329.38ASAHI::COOPERInsert Flipper-type P-name here...Thu Sep 21 1989 16:159
    MOSFET = Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect TRANSISTOR
             ^     ^     ^             ^     ^      ^
    Seems like MOSFET is just a fancy name for a good ole fashioned
    transistor.  I don't think it has anything in common with a tube,
    'cept they both work on electricity.   ;^)
    
    Am I wrong ?
    
    jc
1329.39Valve = tube != FET42384::EVANSAged HippyThu Sep 21 1989 16:3218
    
    The similarity between FET & Tube (Valve as we say in here in the UK)
    is really only the input impedance in both cases is very high.
    
    This led to a lot of the old simple valve biasing circuit analysis
    being revived to handle FET's & colleges always made the comparison
    when teaching FET theory.
    
    	As devices under AC conditions the transfer function (although
    voltage derived as opposed to current as in the original Bi-polar)
    is transistor like as opposed to valve like.  Also the very high
    frequency response makes them more "scratchy" than valves.
    
    I did all this a LOOOOOONG time ago but I'll dig out my college notes
    if anyone is interested.
    
    Cheers
    		Pete.
1329.40DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVIDRock and Roll doctorThu Sep 21 1989 17:015
I think another similarity of FET's to tubes is that both are voltage controlled
rather than current controlled devices, as opposed to bipolar transistors.....


dbii
1329.41F.Y.I.SPKALI::BOILARDThu Sep 21 1989 17:046
  When transistors distort they produce odd harmonics, which are very unpleasing
to the ear.  Tubes, or Valves, produce even harmonics, when they distort, which
are pleasing to the ear.  Thats why tubes create a "warmer" sound.

							Tom Boilard

1329.42ASAHI::COOPERInsert Flipper-type P-name here...Thu Sep 21 1989 18:194
    I always find this stuff fascinating...But I'll just read, keep
    my yapper shut, and stick to SYSGEN's...  ;^)
    
    ;^)
1329.43The lot in one?42384::EVANSAged HippyFri Sep 22 1989 10:4337
    Re .-2 & .-3
    
    Right Dave...as I said FETs are voltage driven as opposed to Bi-Polar
    devices which are current driven (i.e. the transfer function is voltage
    derived in FETs).  This is due to the very high input impedance....in a 
    FET the gate is conductive metal oxide layer sadwiched to a insulative
    layer in turn layered onto a silicon channel so there is no DC current
    path hence Hi impedance.  In a valve the drive grid is a mesh sitting
    in free space also providing no DC path hence also Hi impedance.
    These devices use varying AC charge to regulate a flow of electrons.
    In a FET the gate (depedning on doping which way round) either draws
    free electrons or electron holes toward it reducing or "pinching"
    the available charge carrying region...like squeezing a hose pipe.
    A valve "boils" electrons off a tungston heater at a constant rate
    & accelerates them across a vacuum in which the grid sits.  The charge
    on the grid impedes this flow to a greater or lesser degree.  The
    number of electron past a given point per given time is a measure of
    current.  There are many more electrons in the silicon channel of a FET
    than in the electron "mist" in a valve.  Thus one gets more current
    capability through a FET.  In a valve high voltages are requires to
    accelerate the electrons although only low currents are involved thus
    output transformers are often used to convert to more usable
    voltage/current levels.
    
    	The reason that a valve stage tends toward odd harmonics is that
    there are many mechanical parts involved & this leads to microphony
    i.e. the heater & grid are bits of metal sitting in a bottle to all
    intents.  Things naturally tend to resonate (mechanically) producing
    more odd than even harmonics...any mechanical resonance in the valve
    body or in the transformer laminations will influence the electrical
    signal in a similar way.  Little mechanical resonance will be present
    in a FET.
    
    	Hope you enjoy all this long winded stuff.  Lots of people have
    asked questions around this & I thought I'd do a brain dump.
    
    If you want more than this I DEFINITLY need my college notes.
1329.44How come valves still sound so much better?MARVIN::MACHINFri Sep 22 1989 12:238
    re .43
    
    Pete -- why is it so hard for solid state amp designers to reproduce
    that odd harmonic characteristic of valves? There are so many
    variations on a solid-state distortion theme, and only extremely
    expensive designs get even close to valve sound.
    
    Richard.
1329.45It's an old, but invalid, argumentDNEAST::RAMSEY_CHUCKSave a tree; use BookReader.Fri Sep 22 1989 14:2927
>  When transistors distort they produce odd harmonics, which are very unpleasing
>to the ear.  Tubes, or Valves, produce even harmonics, when they distort, which
>are pleasing to the ear.  Thats why tubes create a "warmer" sound.
    
    Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. If this were true, we'd have had a VERY
    hard time with radio before the invention of the transistor. One of the
    ways that audio amplifiers were (and maybe still are) tested was by
    passing a 1kHz square wave, which is made up of an infinite number of
    BOTH EVEN AND ODD order harmonics of 1kHz, through the amplifier and
    testing the accuracy of the reproduction from the amp.
    
    Distortion produced by overdriving an amplifier generally takes the
    form of clipping -- the normally rounded tops of sine waves become
    flattened, like the top of a square wave. Yes, the flat tops of square
    waves are the result of the even-order harmonic content. But if
    transistor amps only produce odd-order harmonics, that would imply that
    no transistor amp could ever clip a signal.
    
    Whatever difference in sound there is between tube and solid-state amps
    is NOT a result of any difference in harmonic content. It must result
    from other differences in operating characteristics between the two
    devices, added to design differences between different manufacturers'
    circuits. Consider also that most tube power amps drive speakers via
    transformer, and that the transformer can change the characterisitcs of
    the signal as readily as an amplifier.
    
    --Chuck (ex_tech_and_mediocre_guitarist)
1329.46C'mon thats just part of it.42384::EVANSAged HippyFri Sep 22 1989 16:4014
    
    Sure...Fourier tells us this...but when a valve is running it
    resonates, just antenea do on those big ship to shore 10KHz rigs.
    
    It's the microphony of a valve that emphasises the odd harmonics, plus the 
    fact it has a greatly reduced frequency respose rolls the edges of &
    produces a creamy sound.
    
    I did a mega reply for this topic but it got blown away by the net
    dropping but I'll put a full reply in for Richard ASAP.
    
    Cheers
    
    	Pete.
1329.47DNEAST::RAMSEY_CHUCKSave a tree; use BookReader.Fri Sep 22 1989 17:2111
>    It's the microphony of a valve that emphasises the odd harmonics, plus the 
>    fact it has a greatly reduced frequency respose rolls the edges of &
>    produces a creamy sound.
    
    Now this I find much easier to agree with than the flat assertion that
    valves only generate odd harmonics. My electronic theory training is
    NOT at the engineering level, so I did check my assertions with an
    engineer here whose opinion I respect, and who's old enough that he's
    had extensive experience with tube circuits.
    
    --Chuck
1329.48PNO::HEISERhit you where you liveFri Sep 22 1989 21:416
    So what is the bottomline?  Is a FET an adequate replacement for a
    tube?  Should their sound output be about the same?
    
    It has been too long since I played with Drains and Gates! :-)
    
    Mike
1329.49This could get heavy....42384::EVANSAged HippySun Sep 24 1989 15:0246
    
    The answer really is no!
    
    The only similarity between Valves & FET devices is the inherent high
    impedance over the bipolar device (the standard transistor).
    
    The real reason a valve sounds softer than a tranny is due to the
    transfer function i.e mapping of the in signal to the out signal.
    When a valve is driven into saturation (overdriven) it clips less
    readily than a transistor, infact all that really happens is the ratio
    of input to output becomes progressivly less linear.  A FET is not as
    smooth as a valve but not as bad as a bipolar which is a nightmare!
    
    If you look at the graph below & notice the "knee".
    
    
    		TRANSISTOR.(BIPOLAR)
    
    
    mA x100
    O|
    U|
    T|
    P|   ----------------------------  
    U|  /
    T| /
     |/
     +-----------------------------------
    	INPUT (micro amps)
    
    When biasing a bipolar you bias it to run on the flat part of the
    function (which in reality has a positive going slope on it so it
    amplifies).  If you overdrive the  signal past the "knee" the function 
    becomes rapidly nonlinear & the peak becomes very distorted.
    
    In a FET the knee in not quite so pronounced (better), in a valve it is
    a smooth curve (excellent) so the peaks get rolled rather than clipped.
    
    This effect is the primary reason for the valve sound, the other
    microphony effects add a bit more warmth granted but it is pretty
    subjective really.
    
    	Cheers
    		Pete.
    
    
1329.50Amps built with FETS still don't sound right!MARVIN::MACHINMon Sep 25 1989 09:5015
    
    Thanks, Pete. I know nothing about this sort of thing, so I have
    another question.
    
    Granted that this is the case at the 'device level', wy hy is it so 
    hard to design at the 'circuit level' to produce the rolled response
    characteristic of valves? Come to that, why not design microphony into 
    the circuit somehow -- there must be a way of faking it AND avoiding
    the reliability/durability problems of valves. 
    
    Go ahead -- in addition to chips and circuit boards, you're allowed
    to use any bits and pieces you might find in the average car mechanic's
    loft, plus a lemonade bottle.
    
    Richard.
1329.51Control system Vs amp?42384::EVANSif you don't C# you'll BbMon Sep 25 1989 14:1247
	Microphony to me is a bit subjective as I said before....People 
	older & wiser than me say it makes a difference but I believe the 
	actual electrical characteristics are the major players in all this.

	So to your question.....

	I think you could get pretty close & there are two approaches I 
	would consider.

	One could theoretically use many stages in the amp & ensure that no 
	stage would ever push the devices out of linear operating range.
	This would mean using many differing device types & restricting the 
	gain severely on each stage so to get reasonable output power we 
	need many stages (see the expense coming in?).  Then using a feedback 
	system controled by a user preset (preset would be the rate of onset 
	of non-linearity) the stages could be dynamically re-biased across 
	the waveshape to give a progresive de-linerisation of the amp 
	eventually to gentle clipping of the peak.  This is something that 
	would take a bl**dy good analogue engineer a long time to get right,
	the noise problems of so many altering stages would almost 
	insurmountable even with todays super low noise stuff.  It would 
	also be a very expensive amp in bits alone not to mention a high 
	development cost to recoup.  Best use a valve.

	Using Modern digital processors the sound could be sampled digitally 
	& manipulated in Software to emulate a valve, it's possible a single
	fast alogorithm could be devised to do the job or, a patching of 
	pre-sampled sounds could be a way to go here but with all the 
	problems that brings, like detachment from the instrument, non 
	versatility (ie. new ROM card to go from dirty to clean?).  This 
	is the way processors are going, my little microverb has a chip 
	with a million legs on it & a ROM sitting next to it but the art 
	is in its infancy still.  

		Until a lot more Psycho-acoustic research is done 
	to find out how our audiotory system interperets sounds then the 
	difference will be noticable.  Another angle is how many people
	would believe a little box running off a 9V wall adapter could replace
	a wall of 200 watt Marshalls even if it was an exact replica.

		I don't think the valve will ever die, too many people believe
	it's the only tool for the job.

	Cheers
		Pete.
	
1329.52PNO::HEISERhit you where you liveMon Sep 25 1989 15:049
    So it comes down to:
    
    1. Tubes
    2. FETs
    3. Bipolar
    
    Somehow I don't see the order staying this way for long.
    
    Mike
1329.53no reason for change yet.42384::EVANSif you don't C# you'll BbMon Sep 25 1989 15:3211
    
    I don't see it that way.  Transistor amp makers are still making money.
    I know players who love their tranny amps & wouldn't touch my Marshall.
    There's room for all technologies to make a living, FET technology is 
    coming on but the Music industry is not into fabricating transistors...
    & unless someone invests in specifically making a FET with valve
    characteristics (which may or may not be possible) we will have  a
    choice of three technologies....I'd rather that than only two.
    
    Cheers
    		Pete.
1329.54I disagreeSPKALI::BOILARDTue Sep 26 1989 12:0522
R.E. 45

  I disagree.  When solid state devices distort they simply sheer off the
top and the bottom of the wave form. 
  Tubes, on the other hand, do not clip the signal.  They produce what is
called soft distortion.  Meaning the top and bottom of the waveforms are not
square they are rounded. If you do a little more research you will find that
tubes do produce even harmonics.  Put a sine wave through a tube amp sometime. 
  Why do you think old tube mics are one of the most sought after items in a
recording studio.  It's not because they produce odd harmonics, which are not
very musical by the way.    It is because they produce even harmonics which tend
to fatten the sound.  This is also why tube limiters, tube preamps, and 
tube E.Q.s are also very popular.  Do some more research and you will find out 
that this is correct.  
  Also, putting a square wave through a tube amp will not allow you to measure
harmonic distortion.  A square wave is the sum of an ifinite number of sine 
waves.  How can you measure harmonics when already every frequency is present.
Your information is incorrect.

					Tom Boilard

  
1329.55EVENUSRCV1::REAUMEtwo thousand screaming guitarsMon Oct 02 1989 13:209
      I agree w/-.1 that tubes lean more towards even harmonics than
    odd, I read that a long time ago and I don't think it's changed.
    Back to Metaltronix (remember the topic?) - I don't have any info
    on the internals of the amp (SP1000) other than what's already been
    said about transistor current feedback being used to create a tube-type
    sound. It for sure doesn't sound like a standard transistor amp
    especially when it's being pushed hard.
      Couple the SP1000 up to a good tube preamp and you won't miss
    out on the sound.  
1329.56really deepCMBOOT::EVANSif you don't C# you'll BbThu Oct 05 1989 14:508
    
    	I know that valve output use a sort of speach coil damping to
    prevent ringing in the output transformer or something like that....I
    really can't remember too well how it worked but I guess it could be 
    used in a transistor amp by some subtle feed back technique.
    
    	Cheers
    		Pete. 
1329.572 4 or 4 2BOSOX::MCLEMENTTURNED MY HEAD AND STAIREDFri Oct 20 1989 10:426
    I was checking out the sp1000 last night and I noticed that you
    could run 4 cabs off of it,(2 a side) well what I was wondering is how much
    power is derived and split into each cab.


                                         \mArK/
1329.58tsunami sound wavesUSRCV1::REAUMEsyncronize your watchesFri Oct 20 1989 13:0312
      According to the specs I received with the SP1000, the unit puts
    out 100 watts into 8 ohms, 125 into 4 ohms, and it might even list
    something for 2 ohms but I don't think I'd risk it. There is no
    bridging built into the unit, supposedly it is a dual-mono design
    as opposed to true stereo. 
      This piece of gear has been working out really well for me. It's
    compact, light, and sounds great integrated into the rack. Besides,
    when I get bored I can always make the yellow LED's light up! I've
    only been running it into either a single 12 cab or one 4X12, but
    always at 8 ohms. I haven't had the need to fire up the whole stack
    ( at 4 ohms ) with the rack. I have done it with the 100 watt
    Kitty Hawk M1 head. Talk about moving some air!
1329.59Price to drool overMARKER::BUCKLEYI pray the lord, your soul to keepFri Oct 20 1989 18:023
    I was in Mr. C's recently (Marlboro, MA) and saw that they are selling
    the M-1000 head for a mere $650.00.  Whada deal for an amazing sounding
    amplifier! 
1329.60izzit happy hour yet?USRCV1::REAUMEsyncronize your watchesMon Oct 23 1989 14:5324
      re: -.1 
      Yeah, $650 for the M1000 is good. A store here was selling one
    w/ a 4X12 for $1350. I checked it out and found it to be a good
    amp if you play Loud (a great amp if you play LOUDER). I had a similar
    impression of the KMD XV all-tube head, it got real wimpy when the
    volume wasn't pushin. A lot of people are convinced that there is
    no substitute for a crankin amp to get a good sound, but I think
    you need the flexiblility to be able to get some decent sound at
    a reasonable volume. 
      If you have a rack system with a decent preamp, you will have
    a lot more flexibility with the volume/quality of sound differential.
    If you are looking at a head that gives you great sound at lower
    volumes- consider the smaller tube amps (Marshall Artist 30 watters
    sound great!).
       Half power switches on 100 watt heads work differently on different 
    models. One way cuts out two of the four output tubes. Another changes
    the operating charateristics of the tube from Pentode (Five elements)
    to Triode (three). Essentially this is changing the bias on the
    grids inside the power tube. Last, and my favorite because I got
    one, is a switch to go from push-pull (class AB) to class A operation.
    Class A uses all tubes for the full sound wave, where push-pull uses
    two tubes for the positive half of the wave and two for the negative
    half (in a 100 watt amp). Class A only puts out about 30 watts from
    all four tubes but it sounds really warm and you can CRANK it! 
1329.61It's just a tad L O U D !!!MARKER::BUCKLEYI pray the lord, your soul to keepMon Oct 23 1989 16:3411
    You JR...
    
    How involved is that AB -> A mod??  I will say that the M1000 head has
    a great sound, and it sounds better as you get it louder, but this head
    is L O U D!!!  The M1000 is easiler louder than a Marshall 100WT top!
    I guess good ole Lee Jackson isn't kidding when he says they're "Built
    to blast".  I think the M1000 sould shine with such an mod (the AB to
    A).  It has a built-in attenuator, but I don't like the sound in that
    mode...too compressed.  Also, for those wondering, pulling to tubes and
    converting it to 50WTs doesn't help much on the M1000...its still way
    too loud! 
1329.62ASAHI::COOPERNo more flame burning in my heart...Mon Oct 23 1989 16:387
    Just for kicks I set up my two Peavy 4x12's (4ohms) and both of my 
    Micro-stack speakers (16ohms?) on my SP1000...  Talk about peeling
    paint !  next I'll try my crossover...Agagagagagaga.
    
    Metaltronix Roolz !
    
    ;^)
1329.63I don't need no doctor - H.PieUSRCV1::REAUMEsyncronize your watchesTue Oct 24 1989 15:2112
     re .61 : I have a full set of Kitty Hawk prints (thanx Steve G.)
    that includes the M1's class switching. It doesn't look that complex
    on paper as I thought, I know they are changing a supply voltage
    to the power tubes to accomplish this. I think there are a lot of
    variables in the amp would have to be considered to do a mod of
    this type. It probably looks easy on paper because the switching
    is part of the initial design. Supposedly there are similarities
    with Mesa's simul-class operation.
     re .62 : I put my rack (w/ the metaltronix SP1000) into my stack
    cabinets last night. 125 WATTS (not mellow enuff for lower case)
    into eight 12' cele's. Yeeeooow! I noticed a lot of For Sale signs
    up in my neighborhood this morning. AGAGAGAGAG (sic?). SICK! 
1329.64Blew me away!CSC32::G_HOUSEI just can't slow downThu Nov 16 1989 23:569
    Just for anyones information, I played with a M1000 half stack last
    week and was QUITE impressed!  This is one of the best sounding amps
    I've ever played through.  I highly recommend anyone looking for a high
    end amp, especially one with a lot of gain, to try one of these out.
    
    The only thing that bothers me remotely about it is the graphics.  As
    my friend so aptly put it "it's butt-ugly!".  
    
    Greg
1329.65Blues 59 amp topFACVAX::BUCKLEYTNT on I-35Sun Mar 04 1990 17:4610
    Looks like Perfect Connection has just released a new beast.
    
    Saw it in Wurly's this past weekend...it's a new head called the 
    'Blues 59'.  You can spot one a mile away...it has a big blue
    brushed-brass faceplate (like the big gold one on the Metaltronix
    head!).  Not sure how this amp sounds...didn't have the time to try
    it out, but it looked somewhat similar in design to the M-1000 head.
    
    FYI...
    Buck
1329.66all the power ya need but how much$$$$TRACTR::SHIPPINGTue Mar 13 1990 13:3413
         Can anyone tell me how the prices are running right now
    compared to a few mo. ago?  I have a friend that is willing to
    sell me his M-1000 for $600.00 but if I can find a new one some
    where I would rather go with the new one.  I live in NH and would
    drive just about anywhere in Ma to find one if I had to.  
         I have a GK now but need to get a litte (more like alot) 
    power through my system and from what I have read here I think the
    M-1000 will solve all my troubles.  GK's come through 50wpc
    
                        Thanks for any info
                        Dave
    
    
1329.67Hey, I'll buy it if you don't want it!FACVAX::BUCKLEYNo one home in my house of painTue Mar 13 1990 14:146
    Well, Mr. C's in Marlboro said at one time they were blkowing them
    out (of the store) at $650.00...EU is asking like $785.00 or so
    for a head.  I'd buy the M1000 for $600. in a second!  I love the
    sound of that head, even if it does blow up a lot.
    
    
1329.68FACVAX::BUCKLEYNo one home in my house of painTue Mar 13 1990 14:153
    Also note, Mr C's doesn't keep any in stock!  They are still an
    authorized dealer (one of two in MA...the other is Wurlitzer's),
    but have shuned away from pushing the line due to reliability problems.
1329.69Now ya got me Curious!!!TRACTR::SHIPPINGTue Mar 13 1990 17:286
         That is the first thing I've read on relaibility problems!
    Could you please elaborate on these problems?  Are they serious
    or just a blown fuse now and then?
    
                              Dave
    
1329.70FACVAX::BUCKLEYNo one home in my house of painTue Mar 13 1990 18:4714
    -1
    
    Well, to quote BoOm "the words M1000 and Reliability are seldom
    used in the same sentence!"
    
    ;^)
    
    Well, Perfect Connection earned a bad rep in many parts of the country
    cuz they were poorly shipping their M1000 heads and the heads were
    arriving in stores either broken, not working, or blowing up 1 week
    after someone bought them!  Not sure if they've fixed it, but most
    people (like Dave Luiz) think they're junk.  I like the sound of it
    myself, but check it out.  Most people have replaced the tubes with
    Groove Tubes, BTW.
1329.71Look in Goffstown...SMURF::BENNETTFlicker Flicker Flam, POW!Tue Mar 13 1990 19:2812
	Go to route 114 from yer house and hang a left. Head out to where
	114 hangs a left toward the county jail and take a right. There's
	a music store in the plaza across from the supermarket - about 1/2
	mile down on the right. They had nothing but metaltronix.

	The name of the store began w/ 'A', they're in the Manchester phone
	book.

	Why not clean up the butcher?

	ccb
1329.72Antagonize MusicTRACTR::SHIPPINGTue Mar 13 1990 19:4215
         I think the store your takling about (antagonize music) went
    out of business.  Its funny you mention that because this head was
    originaly purchased at that store and the owner of AM was in a band
    with the kid who is now selling it.  So he got a really good deal.
         Its also funny that you mention the Peavey charlie, I did sell
    that last weekend but have yet to figure out how to delete my many
    ads.
    
                                Dave
    ps this head was bought new about 4-5 mo ago so maybe it will have
       no problems but I will take a very carefull look at it before
       I make a purchase.
    
                                Thanks for all the help
    
1329.73TCC::COOPERMIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack pukeTue Mar 13 1990 19:5019
I have an SP1000 power amp.  It's killer, but my relationship with 
Metaltronix/Perfect Connection got off to a rocky start.  Mine is
loud (125 wpc into 4 ohms!) and articulate with a nice overdriven power 
section sound... It gets along GREAT with my MP1 preamp.

First I blew both sides (it's stereo) power output fuses.  I take it apart and
replace the fuses with what was in there...250v5A slo-blow...  Another hour of 
playing and pooof !  This time I call up Perfect Connection and they tell me to 
replace the fuses with 10A slo-blows...I do so (except with 15A :) and 
everything is Okay...

They told me they ran out of the proper fuses during manufacture...they shipped 
the defective units anyway...  Sounds like Materials, Customer Service and
Production control ought to get their sh*t wired tight...But I get the 
impression that Metaltronix stuff is built in someones basement...But the
sound is GREAT !

jc

1329.74TCC::COOPERMIDI-Kitty-ADA-Metaltronix rack pukeTue Mar 13 1990 19:5610
FWIW....

Also, if your on stage, and lose a main output fuse... that is a SERIOUS
reliability problem in my book.  Luckily for me, the burn in period
required for my SP1000 spanned over two practices, not gigs...

I probably would've sent it back and bought a Carver if I'd blown the fuse at
a gig...

jc (Who tries to always have a backup amp, but never wants to use one...;)
1329.75Brief Blues '59 reportLOOKUP::BUCKLEYno one home in my house of painSun Apr 01 1990 01:0133
    Hey kiddies...
    
    Well, I'm just back from an amp shopping trip, and one of the models
    test driven by moi was the new Blues '59 head by Lee Jackson.
    
    Hmmm, where to start on this baby?!?  
    
    First off, it is very similar (if not exact...can't really remember on
    the M1000) control-wise to the M1000 head.  The first noticable
    difference was that the Blues 59 is a 50wt head, whereas the M1000 is
    only available in 100 watts!  
    
    The sound of the '59 is decidely more 'warmer'...less high end sizzle
    than the M1000...I guess this amp (the '59) is geared towards the 
    people wanting a warm tone with lots of sustain.
    
    The amp is built like a tank...it has an active effects loop, featuring
    send AND return level controls...dual speaker jacks, impedance
    switching, your basic tube amp stuff.  Looked like 5 12ax7 preamp tubes
    hiding in back!
    
    The sound?  Very much like my KH Testarossa!  Tons of gain if you want
    it, and a very flat kind of EQ curve.  Even though the tone controls go
    to 20, they are subtle in effect, and offer a warm tone.  I'm not sure
    I liked this amp better than the M1000...I couldn't really get it loud
    enough to tell (it seemed whimpy, and on a respirator!)...but it did 
    seem to sound better at higher volume levels (I creeped them up once).
    This 50wts will rip your head off, don't be fooled!!!
    
    So, I don't think I'll purchase the Blues 59...I have the Testarossa 
    already...Hmmm, looks like 1 more shot at that M1000.
    
    B.
1329.76ToeVLNVAX::ALECLAIRESun Apr 01 1990 14:373
    KH SMITTYHAWK.
    Nice review, but how can you compare the sound with a KH, thay are
    just preamps. What are you powering the KH off?
1329.77News & BluesUSRCV1::REAUMEKH,BC,LP,SGE,SP=METue May 15 1990 19:3515
    
      Something interesting on 'tronix land dudes-
    
      A friend of mine has been (anxiously) awaiting a SP-1000 and finally
    decided to call Metaltronix directly. He got a recording (Lee Jackson?)
    that went : "We're sorry, due to circumstances beyond our control....."
    You get the idea. I'm not sure if they are gone for good or what.
    Come to think of it, When was the last time you saw a Metatronix ad
    run in a major mag. They were running regular for quite a while, but
    lately? I don't think so! 
      Oh sh*t! Hey Coop, let's get our hands on some SP-1000 schematics
    soon before they are hard to find. Damn I just got through this crap
    with clearing up the KH status/schematics. Here we go again.
    
    					-----/boom/-----
1329.78SP1000 would be nice with the MP-1COOKIE::G_HOUSEClaimin'Wed May 16 1990 00:283
What distributor handled them?  They gonna dump the one's left over?

;^)
1329.79DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVIDNice computers don't go downWed May 16 1990 12:303
    O double damm...I haven't got the jangs for a sp yet!
    
    dbii
1329.80back to the grindstoneFREEBE::REAUMEWEEKENDworkweekWEEKENDworkweek...Thu Jun 07 1990 14:0617
    
    Anyone seen any of these "collectors items" out there still.
    Betcha the Blues '59 has got to be one of the rarest amps ever
    made. It really is too bad, because the SP-1000 still outshines
    a lot of other guitar power amps. I guess Lee Jackson got a little
    over his head with his expanding product line and all the M1000's
    that died in early shipping. It's hard to overcome a bad experience
    like that with all the equipment out there. Bad news travels fast!
      The local guy that bought one of my KH Testarossas finally bought
    a MosValve power amp. He loves it! He has nothing but good things
    to say about the power amp, and he's thanked me repeatedly for selling
    him the TR. He's telling me I have to check out his Stevie Ray Vaughn
    tone imitation with his rig. 
      Haven't heard any great deals on Metaltronix "fire sales". Guess
    that only happens once in a blue moon.
    
    						---/boom/---
1329.81How good is the MosValve?COOKIE::G_HOUSENo, I'm very, very shy.Thu Jun 07 1990 16:4814
re: MosValve

I know this isn't the proper note to do it in, but if you could post 
any inforamtion you can get on this, John (or anyone else), I'd really 
appreciate it.  I want to get another power amp and was considering 
the MosValve based on their advertizements.  It's price is good 
and Tube Works is based locally, in Denver (and they seem fairly
stable, so I don't think they'll be in business for a while).

None of the dealers here in the Springs seem to carry them, so I may
have to take a trip up to Denver to try one out (when and if I ever
get my MP-1 back).

Greg
1329.82DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVIDNice computers don't go downThu Jun 07 1990 17:473
My local said he heard that metaltronix is "reorganizing" and will be back

dbii
1329.83UPWARD::HEISERchild of the bluesThu Jun 07 1990 18:033
    Musician's Friend has the MosValve Stereo Power Amp for $459.88
    
    Mike
1329.84DNEAST::GREVE_STEVEWest down Ventura boulevard...Thu Jun 07 1990 18:385
    
    
    
    	Greg, I've dealt with tube works directly and have been pleased
    with their service..
1329.85"Last time in Paris was strange..."MAMIE::RCOLLINSHe's Baaack!Fri Jun 22 1990 06:567
    
    RE:.81
    
     What's wrong with your MP-1 dude?
    
    								R.C.
    
1329.86Wouldn't do the MIDI thangCOOKIE::G_HOUSENo, I'm very, very shy.Wed Jun 27 1990 23:448
    > What's wrong with your MP-1 dude?
    
    It had intermittant problems receiving MIDI input.  I think it's back
    in the store ready for me to pick up now, but I've been pretty sick and
    haven't gotten down there to get it.  Only $41 for whatever they did,
    not bad considering the new tubes, SW update, and all.
    
    Greg
1329.87USRCV1::REAUMEBC,LP,KH,GSP21,SP-built to blastWed Oct 03 1990 18:336
      Hmmmmm - maybe Metatronix was built to blast but not to last.
    
      Seriously , haven't heard squat - though they were getting their
    sh*t back together.
    
    							-BooM-
1329.88DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVIDThe sea refuses no river....Thu Oct 04 1990 12:104
Last I heard from my local dealer was they had shut down to avoid some sort of
hostile take over, but that was all done and they'd be shipping again shortly.

dbii
1329.89Tempting, but what does this tell you?ICS::BUCKLEYI wanna spend my life with youThu Oct 04 1990 12:185
    Found in the WantAds this week:
    
    50wt Marshall head prof. & personally modified by Lee Jackson...$625.
    
    100wt Metaltronix M1000...brand new...$675.
1329.90DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVIDThe sea refuses no river....Thu Oct 04 1990 15:023
gee does that mean that a SP-1000 is a good deal at $385?

dbii
1329.91ICS::BUCKLEYshe smokes &amp; drinks &amp; don't come home at allThu Oct 04 1990 15:313
    I'd buy an SP-1000 at $385 in a heartbeat!
    
    Youse know where dare is one like dat???
1329.92GSRC::COOPERMIDI rack pukeThu Oct 04 1990 15:503
    $385 is a killer deal.  I paid over $500 for mine....
    
    jc
1329.93Available usedGOES11::G_HOUSEBrouhahaThu Oct 04 1990 16:028
    I saw an ad in the local Co. Springs paper a couple of weeks ago for an
    M1000 half stack and a Hamer custom something-or-other as a package
    deal for $1500.  I didn't think it was too bad of a deal, but I didn't
    really want the Hamer (if it was a Steve Stevens model, maybe). 
    Anyway, I never looked into it (like I got that kinda money laying
    around anyway...)
    
    gh
1329.94FREEBE::REAUMEI know trouble cuz I amThu Oct 04 1990 18:116
      I paid over $500 for my SP-1000 as well. I think it was $599.
    
      I'd jump on $385 as well, if I didn't already have amps coming
    out my ears.
    
    							-BooM-
1329.95DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVIDReelect nobody!Thu Oct 25 1990 18:115
    Well I jumped today...or rather will jump (those jangs are in my
    pocket). I'll be rackin' the sp-1000 with my testerossa and a
    midiverbII for a while and then who knows???
    
    dbii rack puke
1329.96ICS::BUCKLEYAll 4 1, and 1 4 all togetherThu Oct 25 1990 18:159
    -1
    
    ROCKIN!
    
    I wanna rack my Quattro with a MV_II and an SP-1000...simple, and 
    rockin!!
    
    PS - WHY are there so MANY Lee Jackson M1000 and Modified Marshall
    heads for sale in the Want Ads these days???
1329.97Buyer's MarketAQUA::ROSTNeil Young and Jaco in Zydeco HellThu Oct 25 1990 19:065
    Re: .96
    
    Because everybody's broke....aintcha heard about the recession, Buck?
    
    						Brian
1329.98fickle group we have herePNO::HEISERIbanez: the axe built to blast!Thu Oct 25 1990 19:424
    So everyone is going from heads to racks to heads again and now back to
    racks? ;-)
    
    Mike
1329.99Guitar players are definately fickle about amps, at least this oneGOES11::G_HOUSEBut this amp goes to 11Thu Oct 25 1990 19:446
    At this point (speaking for them moment only, of course), I'm using
    both!  Head with rack mounted preamp and efx.
    
    Haha!
    
    Greg
1329.100GSRC::COOPERMIDI Rack PukeThu Oct 25 1990 20:176
    Fickle is synonymous with guitarist.  Full circle eh boize ?
    
    Alright DBII !!  You'll LOVE it !
    
    Anyone know if Lee Jackson (alias- Metaltronix/Perfect Connection ?)
    is back on the phone (in business?) ?
1329.101ICS::BUCKLEYAll 4 1, and 1 4 all togetherFri Oct 26 1990 02:025
    >Anyone know if Lee Jackson (alias- Metaltronix/Perfect Connection ?)
    >is back on the phone (in business?) ?
    
    See 1421.* for the latest Mtrnx/P.C. phone number and address I got
    from them.  This was in their new location!
1329.102...and I can pick it up too!!!DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVIDReelect nobody!Fri Oct 26 1990 12:1811
    Yeah I'm racked again...the rivera came down and the sp-1000, the
    quattro, the testerossa, the bayette II and the quadraverb went up!
    
    And Originally I was just gonna "evaluate" the sp-1000 with the
    testerossa...hah!
    
    I did find that the quad was set internally for a low output level,
    just a few program tweeks and I had balls again...the rivera must have
    a pretty hot effect loop.
    
    dbii
1329.103bad case of the I wants!ICS::BUCKLEYand he shall reign for ever and everTue Dec 04 1990 15:475
    Saw an M1000 head in very good condition for $525. at Daddy's in
    the Manchester store over the weekend!  Gee, I wonder how many times
    THAT thing blew up tyo get a price tag of $525!  ;^)
    
    B., who would actually like to buy one of these muthas!
1329.104USRCV1::REAUMEBC,LP,KH,GSP21,SP-built to blastTue Dec 04 1990 17:287
       The only time I saw one in a local music store I asked the salesman
    how much it was going for. He replied "It's not for sale, it's in
    for repair!" More fuel to the fire!!!!
       I wonder if the rarer Blues '59 model ever sold much or was prone to
    breakdown as well.
    
    							-bOOm-
1329.105ICS::BUCKLEYand he shall reign for ever and everTue Dec 04 1990 17:325
    -1
    
    I donno...I played on a Blues `59 for a good hour, and kept saying to
    myself "what is it I don't like about this amp?"  Maybe I just don't
    know how to set it up right?!
1329.106I want that tone!ICS::BUCKLEYNever let you goMon Jan 14 1991 13:175
    Hey Jay T.
    
    I'm really itchin to buy an M1000 head these days.  Just how BAD are
    these things anyways?!?  I've heard horror stories, but I think I 
    remember you saying you worked on a few...well, what's the scam?!?
1329.107Metaltronix meanderings...ICS::BUCKLEYNever let you goThu Jan 17 1991 14:2716
    Well, M1000s are starting to show up USED in shops in DROVES of late!!!
    They must really be blowing up...maybe we can use em in the gulf?
    ;^)
    
    TRhe going price for a used M1000 is now $400.  Not bad..
    
    My quest is not for an M1000, but for a Blues `59 head...not
    so metalish, or as Butt-Fugly as the M1000.  Also, really RARE...
    I'll have trouble finding one I know!
    
    I was talking about Metaltronix/P.C. with this dude who was going to
    NAMM in LA (today), and he said that Lee Jackson has gone back to 
    custom-order work, and that M./P.C. is NO MORE.  What I heard...more 
    later...
    
    Buck
1329.108PNO::HEISERnews: 71 shopping days til no PNOThu Jan 17 1991 14:293
    What about SP1000s?  I'd go rack if I could find one ;-)
    
    Mike
1329.109RAVEN1::BLAIRPlay deep...Thu Jan 17 1991 15:423
    
    	Hey Buck, what kind of amp is a "Blues '59 head"?  'Fraid I've
    	never heard of it.
1329.110JMHOGOES11::G_HOUSEWalking the path of ToneQuestThu Jan 17 1991 15:4611
    I'd go with a MosValve rather then an SP1000, personally.  TubeWorks is
    a more stable company, and I've heard their service is excellent.  I've
    heard a lot of complaints about the reliability of Metaltronics 
    equipment and the company is now out of business.  I don't know what
    they used for componants in the P.C. SP1000s, but if there's anything
    custom in there, you're in trouble if it breaks.
    
    Besides that, the MosValve costs less and has more features (automatic
    bridging to mono and presence control).
    
    Greg
1329.111RAVEN1::JERRYWHITERoll'em-I'll just feel somethingThu Jan 17 1991 16:013
    The Mosvalve rooolz !   8^)
    
    Scary (who'll be getting his this weekend ... hopefully !)
1329.112GSRC::COOPERMIDI Rack PukeThu Jan 17 1991 16:0326
    RE: Pat
    
    The Blues '59 head is a custom Metaltronix amp  by Lee Jackson
    (the dude who sets up "everyones" rigs.  I guess he did Van Halens
    early rigs, and a BUNCH of other famous peoples (perhaps Buck can
    supply some more names).  He has been "for years" *the* premier amp
    dude; especially known for souping up Marshalls.  Right Buck ?
    
    RE: Mike/Greg
    
    Yeah Mike, I'd have to agree with Greg here.  Since Metaltronix/Perfect
    Connect is kinda kaput, I'd say go with a MOSvalve.  Although I have a
    Metaltronix SP1000 and am extremely pleased with it, I've also A/B'd it
    with a MOSvalve.  Not that the MOSvalve is *that* much better (I can't
    really see the difference that the two power amps make), but it does
    have some nifty new bells and whistles that the SP1000 doesn't have.
    Like the automatic bridging and presence controls, neither of which the
    SP1000 has.  On the other hand, if you had a rack-based set
    up the SP1000 is *THE KING* of light shows, and is certainly just as
    loud (if not louder) than the MOSvalve...But then, anything 100+watts
    is gonna be loud enough for ANY place.  In my humble opinion, a power
    amp is a power amp.  Your tone comes from your preamp and maybe (just
    maybe) be coloured a bit by your poweramp.
    
    jc (Who loves his SP1000, but it's ONLY a power amp ...)
                                              
1329.113GSRC::COOPERMIDI Rack PukeThu Jan 17 1991 16:044
    Oh and for those of you who have heard MIDI Rack Puke Rap, I'll quote
    <insert pinned VU meters here> "Metaltronix Ruullllzzzzzz"
    
    ;)
1329.114nice 'n' lightUPWARD::HEISERnews: 71 shopping days til no PNOThu Jan 17 1991 16:123
    Another consideration:  the SP1000 is only 1 rack space.
    
    Mike
1329.115GSRC::COOPERMIDI Rack PukeThu Jan 17 1991 16:156
    Yes, and 14lbs - 125wpc (into a 4 ohm load).
    
    Pound for pound, a VERY potent package.  Anyone who has seen me live
    can attest that it is VERY (read:painfully) loud at 1/4 volume.
    
    jc (Metaltronix Marketing Management ;)
1329.116But how much does it weigh?GOES11::G_HOUSEWalking the path of ToneQuestThu Jan 17 1991 16:158
    Personally, I'm not concerned with the number of rack slots it takes
    up, but how heavy it is.  I don't remember, but I remember thinking
    that the MosValve is fairly light.  
    
    Unfortunately people borrowed *all* my mail order catalogs here and I
    can't check the shipping weight...  ;^(
    
    Greg
1329.117almost twice the SP1000UPWARD::HEISERnews: 71 shopping days til no PNOThu Jan 17 1991 16:203
    MOSvalve is 26 lbs. according to my catalogs.
    
    Mike
1329.118GSRC::COOPERMIDI Rack PukeThu Jan 17 1991 16:225
    >MOSvalve is 26 lbs. according to my catalogs.
    
    WHAT A BEAST !  That thing weighs almost as much as a TWIN !
    
    ;')
1329.119Not badGOES11::G_HOUSEWalking the path of ToneQuestThu Jan 17 1991 16:2410
    Still relatively lightweight, compared to a tube amp.  I'd guess my M3
    head probably weights about 35-40 lbs.  Also consider that what's
    listed in the catalog is the shipping weight, which includes packing
    material and stuff.  
    
    It also lists 55 lbs as the shipping weight of a Marshall 4x10 speaker
    cabinet, but when Buck shipped the two I bought from him they were only
    about 40 lbs, so caveat emptor if ya know what I mean.
    
    Greg
1329.120DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVIDvictim of unix...Thu Jan 17 1991 16:395
Yeah real light compared to a stereo tube amp

my Rivera 60 W stereo amp wieght 65lbs....

dbii
1329.121FREEBE::REAUMEPassing Lane-TR @ RedlineFri Jan 18 1991 14:4113
          No doubt the Blues '59 head has gotta be rare. They were
    announcing this model just as the company was biting the big one.
    I got to see a nice full color promo sheet on the Blues '59.
    Buck's right, it isn't quite as ugly as the M1000.
          I'm not in the market for any amps. The only thing I might
    do is mount one of my spare KH preamps in the old M3 head shell
    and couple it to a Hughes and Kettner Guitar slave (CF-100) power
    amp module. Effectively it will be a new spare amp head with all
    the KH preamp features. I'll either use my Boss ME-5 for effects,
    or go with a Lexicon LXP-5 and sell the Boss unit. Depends on how
    I do with this years taxes.
    
    						-B()()M-
1329.122kick up some dust!FREEBE::REAUMELet's get RACKed!Tue Jun 02 1992 18:0420
    
      I don't know who wrote that last reply but was he off base!!
    After seeing that there hasn't been a reply in this topic in
    over a year and the company bit the bag, I figured I'd enter a 
    different kind of note (for me anyway).
    
      It seems that only two items have been stable in my rack. I went 
    through three preamps in the rack before the ACCESS, and a couple
    of effects processors, but the mainstays have been the Korg DT-1 Pro
    tuner and my trusty Metaltronix/Perfect Connection power amp. And I
    don't intend to change these anytime soon. I hope I'm not tempting fate 
    by say what a workhorse my SP-1000 has been. If anything should have
    been salvaged from the Metaltronix wreckage, this was it. Hey Lee
    Jackson - sell the design to Ampeg dangitall!!!
    
      On top of my kind words for this unit, there are (at least) two other 
    noters that have had one of these long term! So there - I don't ALWAYS
    go out and buy the newest gizmo on the shelf!!!!
    
    							-B()()M-    
1329.123DPE::STARRTue Jun 02 1992 18:258
> On top of my kind words for this unit, there are (at least) two other 
> noters that have had one of these long term! 

I don't know if I was included in that count, but I still swear by my
KH Quattro -> SP-1000 combination that I've had for a couple years now.
No need to upgrade a thing - it does everything I need it to do!!!

alan
1329.124KDX200::COOPERIbanez - Love at first feelTue Jun 02 1992 20:263
My Sp1000 is here to stay also...
It's still the ballz of my rig !!
jc
1329.125couldn't resistRAVEN1::BLAIRWhat *is* it, Man?Wed Jun 03 1992 11:3318
================================================================================
Note 1329.122    Metaltronix Amplification (Perfect Connection)       122 of 124
FREEBE::REAUME "Let's get RACKed!"                   20 lines   2-JUN-1992 14:04
                            -< kick up some dust! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
>     It seems that only two items have been stable in my rack. 
    
    	Hmmm.  Lessee, 1) the power strip?, 2) tuner?
    
    
>     I don't ALWAYS go out and buy the newest gizmo on the shelf!!!!
>    
>    							-B()()M-    
    
      Boom, yer a regular model of restraint!
    
      -pat (just teasin'!)  
1329.126HEDRON::DAVEBStranger in a strange landWed Jun 03 1992 15:033
Mine has worked flawlessly for over a year now. And it's pretty loud...

dbii
1329.127KDX200::COOPERA regular model of restraint...Wed Jun 03 1992 17:174
Just checking my personal name...
Thanks Pat !!

:)
1329.128DABEAN::REAUMEtighten the restraints Doc!Thu Jun 04 1992 11:489
    
      I think that means four of us have a SP-1000.
    
      Coop , Alan S, dbii, and me! I think thats it. 
    
      Hey - there's no other power amps out there w/ sine_wave LED meters!
    
    								-B()()M-
    
1329.129KDX200::COOPERA regular model of restraint...Thu Jun 04 1992 11:583
    The trick with those meters is to see how long you can keep
    them all lit...
    :)
1329.130DABEAN::REAUMEACCESS the tone zoneThu Jun 04 1992 12:267
     
      I occasionally look at my meters while playing - hello Yellow!
    
      Luckily this new band I'm in is fairly loud (did I say that?)
    and the Sp-1000 shines when pushed (audio wise and illuminated!)
    
    							_B()()M-
1329.131KDX200::COOPERA regular model of restraint...Thu Jun 04 1992 14:516
This hasn't been said in a while:

Metaltronix rulez !!

(I wanna buy a hutch!)
jc
1329.132DABEAN::REAUMEPerfectly CoNNected!Thu Jun 04 1992 17:0518
    
       ...yeah - what he said!!!
    
       Even though the SP-1000 hasn't been resurrected there has been a
    slew (sic?) of new guitar oriented power amps lately, many of them
    non-tube. Like:	Rocktron's VELOCITY 300
    			Hafler       MosFET something
    		        Marshall's   VALVEstate 8008/8004
    			H&K          CF-200 (replaces CF-100)
    			ADA 	     Microtube 200 (hybrid w/12AX7's)
    
      	      Tubewise there's:
    
    			H&K 	     VS-250 (2 X 50 / four EL84's)
    			VHT	        ?
    			Seymour Duncan  ? (big$)
    
    							-B()()M-
1329.133KDX200::COOPERA regular model of restraint...Thu Jun 04 1992 17:375
Big bucks ??

How about Boogies Simulclass 295 and the 5050.  They have 6L6 drivers in 'em !

jc
1329.134Peavey 60/60 tube power ampMILKWY::JACQUESVintage taste, reissue budgetFri Jun 05 1992 17:2212
    Another source for guitar power amps is Peavey. They have a few
    differant models. The one I'm most familiar with is the 60/60.
    They also make a mono 60w amp. My understanding is that these
    amps can use 6l6 or EL34 power tubes. 
    
    The 60/60 is very similar to the Mesa Boogie 50/50. It has the
    same presence circuit which uses 12AX7's. The 60/60 is priced
    about $300 less then a Mesa 50/50.
    
    Definately worth checking out if your in the market.
    
    Mark
1329.135FREEBE::REAUMEperfectly&lt;==&gt;connectedMon Dec 14 1992 23:1617
    
    
      I attended a music store Christmas Party last night. One of those
    "by invitation only" things. The weird thing is I hadn't bought
    anything there in the last year, maybe they are trying to tell me
    something!
      So I got together with Tim Harrington (axeman for the Masters of
    Reality and the Bogeymen) and started on the subject of amps. 
    He has used a Metaltronic M1000 for some time and truly loved the amp.
    According to him the new Lee Jackson designed Ampegs don't even measure
    up! He's using an an old Ampeg B-15 head coupled to a 12" speaker these
    days. He also has a 50 watt Marshall (older model) that he likes.
      On the Metaltronix amps he mentioned that he would NEVER take the
    M1000 on the road. It blew up on him a couple times and he lost trust in
    it. I told him that if he had it bulletproofed to not self-destruct
    that it would be a classic. Interesting thought there! 
    
1329.136NWACES::HICKERNELLI'll see it when I believe it.Tue Dec 15 1992 11:014
    Isn't an Ampeg B-15 the old Portaflex bass amp?  Or am I confused?  Or
    does he play through a little bass amp?
    
    Dave
1329.137Fliptop BloozTECRUS::ROSTI fret less these daysTue Dec 15 1992 11:215
    Oh, man, the B-15 makes a *killer* lead amp if you like your sound
    really brown...big, fat, oozing with grease, and at 30 watts running it
    on 10 is no sweat!
    
    						Walter Hull
1329.138The M1000 of great priceGOES11::G_HOUSEBig cheese, MAKE me!Tue Dec 15 1992 14:3015
    I honestly didn't think the Lee Jackson Ampeg sounded as good as the
    Metaltronix M1000 either, but 2-3 years had transpired between the time
    I played them and I thought maybe I'd just forgotten or my tastes in
    tone had changed some or something.
    
    All I remember is being completely blown away by the M1000 I demoed, I
    mean standing there with drool running down my face, playing the thing
    until they closed the store, considering selling my car and most of
    what I owned so I could buy one...
    
    But when I played the new Ampeg, I thought something like...  "Cool
    amp, but I like my Marshall better.  If I needed three sounds, I might
    think about it."
    
    Greg
1329.139POWDML::BUCKLEYLose yourself and gain a friendTue Dec 15 1992 14:497
    Have yet to hear the Ampeg thing.  I saw one in Dallas ... the guy
    said "You'll drool" -- I replied "yeah, as I walk out the door" 8^)
    
    I remember my jaw on the floor with the M1000.  Even the ultra rare
    BLUES 59 didn't sound as good!
    
    ?!?!?
1329.140Guitar power amp to be used for bass?COOKIE::LAMBERTSam, Storage Mgmt. Engineering @CXOTue Oct 11 1994 12:3112
   Any thoughts out there as to how a Metaltronix/Perfect Connection guitar
   power amp would work as bass power amp?  My gut feel is that it _should_
   work just fine, but I'd like to know if these things are somehow "tuned"
   for the signals a guitar preamp would likely send to it, or some other
   electronic esoterica.

   Question #2:  Can the stereo amp be bridged to run in mono mode?

   Thanks,

   -- Sam
   
1329.141GOES11::HOUSEHow could I have been so blind?Tue Oct 11 1994 13:125
    I *think* it was just a standard MOSFET based power amp, therefore
    would probably work ok for bass.  However, they power rating was lower
    then what you'd typically run in a bass rig.
    
    Greg
1329.142KDX200::COOPERRevolution calling!Wed Oct 12 1994 13:445
    I'd think it'd work Sam - As Greg said - 100/side might be a little
    low - but these things are loud as snot anyway.  You're welcome
    to take mine up to Woodland for a night and try it...
    
    jc
1329.143COOKIE::LAMBERTSam, Storage Mgmt. Engineering @CXOWed Oct 12 1994 14:0210
   Thanks for the info (and offer, Coop!).  I've also gotten some info via
   mail;  specifically, that these beasts are not bridgable.  Bummer.  I'm
   looking to use it for the "bottom" of a biamp rig, and while 200w (bridged
   mono) would probably work, 100w is a little lean.  Especially since I'll
   be powering the top with 150w...

   The search continues.

   -- Sam
   
1329.144GOES11::HOUSEHow could I have been so blind?Thu Oct 13 1994 12:504
    100wts is probably pretty short for much bottom end.  Bass frequencies
    really suck up the power amp output power.
    
    gh
1329.145POWDML::BUCKLEYwhy do we have to fall from grace?Thu Oct 13 1994 12:592
    ya need one of those PV 1200wt jobbers feeding a stack of Hartke cabs
    for that killerlow end!!
1329.146GOES11::HOUSEHow could I have been so blind?Thu Oct 13 1994 15:023
    Peavey???  Un-uh.  Crown.
    
    gh