[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

5108.0. "Digital's Retiree Health Benefits Eligibility Rule Change" by STAR::PMOSTEIKA (Paul, ZKO3-4/s31, 381 (881)-1075) Tue Jan 28 1997 18:15

 

    I've entered very few notes in the past, but, I'm wondering what is known
    and who is impacted by the new change to retiree medical care?

    According to a letter received from Corporate, all my service to date does
    not count towards retiree medical care benefits, and the paying of lower
    premiums for that benefit care. To qualify an employee must now work 10
    years between age 45 and 55.

    That may sound well and fine, but, after 23 years of service I now need to
    work an additional 9 years!

    How can they say that this doesn't affect most employees? It happens to
    affect almost all the employees that I know. Anyone that started at DEC at
    an early age it will effect. It also affects any young new hires that
    leave before reaching age 55 and having that 10 years of service.

    I know DEC reserves the right to modify or eliminate retiree benefits, but
    with one stroke of pen they've eliminated many years of service. How can
    they say that they're proud to announce this when they are taking away one
    of the most valuable retirement benefits from people that have already
    qualified? Only those that join DEC at age 45 and stay until age 55 can
    possibly benefit. There's also a special rule to help those that had
    interrupted service.

    We've seen some good changes in the past, and some tough decisions to
    reduce spending. But what really worries me is what's next?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
5108.1LEXSS1::GINGERRon GingerTue Jan 28 1997 18:187
    This was pretty thouroughly beaten to death a week or so ago. If you
    stay here until minimum retiremetn age and retire, you havent lost
    anyting. If you leave before retirement age, you never did have a
    retirement medical benefit anyway, so you havent lost what you never
    had.
    
    I dont recall the previous note, but its in here.
5108.2BUSY::SLABAs you wishTue Jan 28 1997 18:467
    
    	See note 5085.
    
    	It could have been found by doing a
    
    	DIR l-1/TIT = RETIR
    
5108.3If you're using a command line interface?COPS01::kiji.cop.dec.com::skinnerTue Jan 28 1997 19:167
Or by clicking on Directory, Other Criteria, Title: <enter something>, if 
you're using Teamlinks conferencing.  We can't just assume that everyone in 
these conferences can do a DIR etc. etc. I haven't seen a Notes command line 
in years.


Jay
5108.4ORION::chayna.zko.dec.com::tamara::eppesNina EppesTue Jan 28 1997 19:3012
>We can't just assume that everyone in 
>these conferences can do a DIR etc. etc. I haven't seen a Notes command line 
>in years.

Nowadays I usually say something like "use DIR/TITLE or the equivalent in
whatever Notes client you're using."  It's tough to cover all the bases these
days... :-)  (Though you can enable a command line in TeamLinks Conferencing
that lets you enter DIR/TITLE, etc.)

- Nina


5108.5BUSY::SLABAs you wishTue Jan 28 1997 19:477
    
    	RE: .3
    
    	Is it TEAMLINKS that puts the username in this format?
    
            COPS01::kiji.cop.dec.com::skinner
    
5108.6vaxcpu.zko.dec.com::michaudJeff Michaud - ObjectBrokerTue Jan 28 1997 20:337
	Personally I use a search engine such as:

		http://altavista.notes.lkg.dec.com:8000/

	and for this conference would use a search string such as:

		+url:digital +... and so on
5108.7NetNotes formatsmurf.zk3.dec.com::wolf95.zk3.dec.com::PBECKPaul Beck, WASTED::PBECKTue Jan 28 1997 20:399
>    
>        RE: .3
>    
>        Is it TEAMLINKS that puts the username in this format?
>    
>            COPS01::kiji.cop.dec.com::skinner
>    

Teamlinks may. NetNotes definitely does.
5108.8Teamlinks personal name - yesCOPS01::copras1_port10.cop.dec.com::skinnerTue Jan 28 1997 21:501
Teamlinks puts the name in that form, yes.
5108.9well it looks like NOTES outgoing on the STAR cluster is not using the IP alias :-)galaxy.zko.dec.com::VAXCPU::michaudJeff Michaud - ObjectBrokerWed Jan 29 1997 03:3316
>>        Is it TEAMLINKS that puts the username in this format?
>>            COPS01::kiji.cop.dec.com::skinner
> Teamlinks may. NetNotes definitely does.

	The client could be sending everything after COPS01::,
	but in most cases it's the NOTES servers that prepend
	the source nodename or hostname for each hop (ie.
	including intermediate hops).

	For example, I opened this conference as:

		OPEN/NONOTEBOOK star::humane.mro.dec.com::digital

	and the author field should have:

		star.zko.dec.com::VAXCPU::michaud
5108.10Senior employees aren't loosing, juniors are gainingNASEAM::READIOA Smith &amp; Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman LocksWed Jan 29 1997 15:4810
Usta be if you worked at DEC for 25 years or more and were still 
working at DEC when you reached 55, you got the bennies.

So....you still have to have at least 25 years of service and you have to 
be here when you hit 55. 

Same difference.  Your first 15 years of service were from age 30 to age 45 
and your final 10 were from age 45 to age 55.

Nothing's changed 'cept the wording
5108.11ClarificationSTAR::PMOSTEIKAPaul, ZKO3-4/s31, 381 (881)-1075Tue Feb 11 1997 15:5724
RE: 5108.2 - yes I did do a directory. Even though I waited what seemed to be
a very long time, I did not see a note appropriately titled. Note 5085 has a
title of retirement package. This is the problem with notes, the chances are
if you look long enough, you'll proabably find at least a handfull of other
notes regarding the same question/answer. But not all are obviously titled,
which holds true for replies as well.

I did call back to our Benefits group (which is not DEC) with my question.
 
    They claim that you:
    don't have any benefit, or should I say that you do not qualify for
    any reduced medical coverage retirement benefit just because you work
    for DEC for 25 years. That you do qualify after 10 years if you work 
    between age 45-55 and must retire from DEC. All they are doing is making
    it avaliable sooner.

Well that sure is looking at it from another angle. I have not checked
my records, but I was under the assumption that a worker with 25 years
or more service was entitled to certain retirement benefits. Of which
this was just one, even if you retire from some other company. So I stand
corrected unless I find otherwise.


					Paul
5108.12Always had to "retire" to be eligible for medical benefitsVSSCAD::SIGELTue Feb 11 1997 19:5533
Re .11

The 1991 Benefits Book, which came out before the 25-year rule was
instituted, stated clearly that you could retire from Digital only
if you were 55-64 and had worked at Digital for at least 10 years,
or 65 and older and had worked for Digital at least one year.
Furthermore, you had to work at least 30 hours a week to be eligible
for medical benefits.  Pension is only affected by vesting rules -- 
by law, once fully vested in the Pension plan, you're eligible to get 
the pension even if you leave Digital before retirement age.

The book stated specifically, "Also ineligible [for medical benefits] 
are employees who leave Digital before retiring."

This wasn't changed when the 25-year rule was brought in for medical 
benefits (announcement, mid-1993; effective 1/1/94); the 25-year rule 
just told the retiree how big their contribution to the medical benefits 
would be if they retired from Digital.  You still had to be a retiree 
as laid out in the above rules.

So, since formal retirement from Digital is not possible before age 55,
and the new medical benefits rule starts counting the new 10 year requirement
at age 45, there is no net loss for anyone now under age 45 who has
accumulated any number of years of service, since if they stay at
Digital until they're at least 55 they'll have the ten years they
need, and if they don't stay that long before they leave they won't
be eligible for retirement benefits beyond taking their pension with them.

This is advantageous for new company hires 45 or older since they only 
have to work 10 years to get full medical benefits, which presumably makes
Digital more attractive for certain employees.

-- Andrew