[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

1222.0. "800, 900, DEC, and you" by COVERT::COVERT (John R. Covert) Mon Oct 08 1990 17:22

Recently three people have forwarded me a portion of a memo which states,
in part:

   ... there has also been an escalation of letters and telephone calls
   to employees (at their workplace), indicating that the employee (by name)
   has "won a significant prize and should telephone an '800' or '900' number."
   These contacts appear to be a rejuvenation of an old scam.  The impact to
   the Corporation is that the '900' numbers cost DEC $80.80 per call; the
   '800' numbers generate an automatic charge that ranges between $5.50 -
   $40.00 (regardless of the "shortness" of the call).  Authorities are 
   currently helpless to reduce the scam because the automatic charges 
   are usually mentioned (quickly) or printed (in extremely small 
   letters) as part of the approach.

I've been asked to comment on the charges for calling the 800 numbers.

The memo is not completely correct.  There is no telco charge for calling
an 800 number.  Period.  However, the scam does cost DEC money.

Here's how the scam works:

THE OFFER:

You receive a phone call and are told "If you call 800-xxx-xxxx we will
provide some service or information.  Only $15.99."

THE ACCEPTANCE:

So you call the 800 number.  When you call an 800 number, your telephone
number may be delivered to the called party (and if Caller ID is not ruled
inappropriate in your area, your number may be delivered to the called party
even if you call a local number).

THE CONSIDERATION:

The number answers, and some worthless service or information is provided.

THE INVOICE:

The invoice arrives in the mail from the sleezy company (not from the phone
company).  DEC's corporate resources are expended dealing with the invoice,
which in my opinion should simply be filed in the trash.  However, DEC's
accounts payable office may not operate under such simple rules and may be
required to pay the invoice or expend resources challenging it.

In addition, the number provided on the invoice will usually not be the
extension number of the person who made the call, but rather the main number
for the location or the number of an outgoing PBX trunk; thus the person who
accepted the offer and received the consideration cannot easily be discovered.

/john

P.S.: The part about the 900 numbers is completely valid; exhorbitant charges
for 900 numbers has become enough of a problem that a congressional inquiry
is in progress.  All DEC locations with properly managed PBXs block calls to
900 numbers (although 900-200-xxxx and 900-344-xxxx are free).
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1222.1DLB9's been bombarded with those callsNRADM::PARENTIT'S NOT PMS-THIS IS HOW I REALLY AMMon Oct 08 1990 19:2213
    Re .0
    
    "As we speak" we're being inundated with these phone calls from a
    New York radio station here at DLB.
    
    In addition to the direct costs associated there's also the indirect
    costs of someone having to stop what they're doing and answer the
    phone.  (And then additional lost productivity while everyone stands
    around complaining about the calls.)
    
    Too bad DEC Security couldn't do something to put a stop to it.
    
    ep
1222.2SDEVAX::THACKERAYMon Oct 08 1990 20:0510
    Although this would cost a little effort, it seems to me that DEC
    Security could zip a message around instructing people, upon receipt of
    such a call, to mail a central DEC Security account with the number and
    date/time of the call, any salient details, and to call a specified 
    FBI number.
    
    If we are talking about "inundation", the subsequent inundation of some
    FBI official would soon put a stop to the nonsense.
    
    Ray
1222.3Annoying TechnologyOAKISL::JUDICEPeripheral VisionaryMon Oct 08 1990 20:5412
    
    Around 10pm last Thursday, I received a phone call at home - it was
    the KYO facility Voicemail, delivering a message it had just received.
    
    The message was one of the sleezy 900 "call to claim your prize".
    
    Technology... A machine calls a machine, leaving a message, which then
    got forwarded to me. 
    
    
    /ljj
    
1222.4COOKIE::WITHERSTea, Earl Grey, Hot.Tue Oct 09 1990 04:0611
An automated dialer system called all the phones at CXN relatively recently
and left messages for all the voicemail subscribers.  Unfortunately, the
the message started "talking" while the voice mail greeting was going and
ran long enough that voice ]mail hung up on the caller.  So, teh messages
we all walked into to get said something like:

  "orp and we are the largest ... blurb ... and our phone number is 719 68"

so much for technology!

BobW
1222.5wellMFGMEM::MIOLAPhantomTue Oct 09 1990 11:0212
    
    
    I don't know if this is the same scam, but I received a call yesterday
    by some recording. I was here at work, and it said I already one 
    x, y or Z...and just call such and such a number.......
    
    
    BY that time I hung up.
    
    
    
    Lou
1222.6WKRP::LENNIGDave (N8JCX), SWS, CincinnatiTue Oct 09 1990 12:2710
    My tack on these calls is to keep them on the line as long as possible.
    This reduces their effectiveness, and sometimes increases their costs.
    
    If it's an automated calling machine, I simply set the phone down
    rather than hang up. This reduces the number of calls per hour it 	
    can make. If it's a person, I lead them on for as long as possible, 
    including asking them to hold a few times. This is particularly
    satisfying when they are calling long distance.
    
    Dave
1222.7MADMAG::NORRISWhat is it, Miss Pfeffernuss?Tue Oct 09 1990 13:086
    There are local counterparts to the 900 service. Usually the numbers
    start with 976. I called the NYNEX business office and was told that
    their local "900" number is 500. I haven't seen a 500 number
    advertised, so don't hold me on this one.
    
    The best advice is to NOT call any offer from a DEC phone!
1222.8If it smells like crime it isELWOOD::KAPLANUndercover lunchbox guyWed Oct 10 1990 00:1118
    > 
    > "As we speak" we're being inundated with these phone calls from a
    > New York radio station here at DLB.
    >

    We're getting this one, too. Only, I suspect there's no radio station
    in reality.  The one I got was from radio station "880" and every other
    phrase in the pitch contained some reference to "880" - including the
    lower digits of the 900 number - and also (said extremely fast) the
    cost of the call.

    What a rip !  Some psychologist somewhere probably researched how to
    effectively obscure the cost.

    IMHO we need a law here.  What are our legislators doing anyway ?
    (asked rhetorically - please keep your answer to yourself).

    L.-who-wonders-is-the-calls-to-business-phones-is-intentional
1222.9'No, thank you <<CLICK>>'DEC25::BRUNONever give up on a good thingWed Oct 10 1990 11:0717
    RE: <<< Note 1222.8 by ELWOOD::KAPLAN "Undercover lunchbox guy" >>>
    
>    IMHO we need a law here.  What are our legislators doing anyway ?
>    (asked rhetorically - please keep your answer to yourself).

     Sorry, never could stick to the rules of rhetoric.
    
     A bill has been being slapped around in congress regarding
    tele-marketing, however there are a lot of jobs (low-paying, but still
    jobs) at risk if it becomes outlawed.  Bush opposes any restrictions on
    the practice, and the bill doesn't stand much of a chance.
    
    However, there are already laws regarding fraud.  It's that quick
    mention of the cost of the call that gets these folks off the hook.
    
                                    Greg
    
1222.10Some (Little) Relief in Mass.NRADM::PARENTIT'S NOT PMS-THIS IS HOW I REALLY AMWed Oct 10 1990 11:257
    A couple of months ago N.E. Telephone sent postcards out with their
    bills....if you returned the card you would be removed from the lists
    of companies making these recorded solicitations.  The only "gotcha"
    is the calls had to originate in Mass.  Doesn't seem to have reduced
    the volume of calls though...
    
    ep
1222.11At UPO, tooMYGUY::LANDINGHAMMrs. KipWed Oct 10 1990 14:597
    An automated recording dialer was going through the the UPO facilities
    last week-- something about a major credit card being reserved if you
    dialed a 900 number.  One secretary's line rang three times with the
    same recorded message.
    
    What a hassle.  I *LIKE* the idea of keeping the line open to ring up
    their charges!  
1222.12nISTG::DKELLYWed Oct 10 1990 15:256
    
    
    I've had two of these calls in about two weeks.  One was from the
    "radio station" and the other was for the credit card.  Both had
    charges somewhere in the $39.00 price range!  This is taking place
    in LMO (Marlboro).  
1222.13get that numberLEDS::GRINCH::KALINI'll take New England any day...Wed Oct 10 1990 16:259
    I wish that I'd seen this topic earlier! Today we got two calls
    from the 'radio station', and now I wish I had written down the
    number to give to security. The call went like this..."This is
    Bouncin' Bob from station Mumble, calling to say you will WIN a
    35mm camera OR a lcd watch if you call back in 10 minutes. There
    is a $9.95 charge for the call. Blah, blah, blah...repeat,repeat,
    repeat..."
    			dk
    
1222.14ROYALT::KOVNEREverything you know is wrong!Wed Oct 10 1990 16:4212
I think calls like this should be considered gambling. After all, the "house"
gets money for every call. This doesn't apply to 800 numbers or regular long
distance, where only the phone company gets the money.

BTW, I got one of these this morning. I didn't even listen to it all;
I stopped the voicemail playback and deleted it. They had already spent
their money recording the message. This one was $19.95 for the call.


I do know that New England Telephone has to allow customers to block 900
calls; I don't know if that applies to business customers as well, or if it
is practical for Digital; but I'd suggest blocking these calls.
1222.15900s are blocked in DEC PBXsCOVERT::COVERTJohn R. CovertThu Oct 11 1990 02:555
re .14

>I'd suggest blocking these calls.

We have blocked these calls in all GMA PBXs (as .0 says).
1222.16This hasn't happened to me...yetMILKWY::MORRISONBob M. FXO-1/28 228-5357Mon Oct 15 1990 00:3011
  There is an element of fraud here. The persons receiving the call are led to
believe that THEY, not their employer, will be billed for the call. It may
not occur to them until much later that they can't be billed because the mar-
keter didn't ask for their address or credit card number. Also, a lot of people
don't know that in many regions the technology is readily available to auto-
matically trace incoming long-distance calls (but not traced to a direct-dial
extension). 
  How do the marketers get a DEC plant address to send the bill to? Is there a
new deal for business phone customers where they can call the phone company and
get the address where a phone number is located? Residential customers can't do
this.
1222.17Reverse Phone BookMEMIT::CANSLERMon Oct 15 1990 11:4511
    
    Go to your local library and ask for the Reverse Phone Book, look up
    the number. The book will tell you who the number belongs to and where
    they are at.  Then ask for the Town directory for that town and it will
    give you all the information that is needed.  Most marketing companies
    have this type information on computer so the search and destroy is
    much faster. If you don't want to be tracked don't use checks , credit
    cards or any thing that puts your name on a list, especially using your
    Social Security number, the IRS sales that data.
    
    Bob
1222.18Long distance calls are cheapULTRA::HERBISONB.J.Mon Oct 15 1990 13:4224
        Re: .6

>    My tack on these calls is to keep them on the line as long as possible.
>    This reduces their effectiveness, and sometimes increases their costs.
>    If it's a person, I lead them on for as long as possible, 
>    including asking them to hold a few times. This is particularly
>    satisfying when they are calling long distance.

        No matter what time they are calling, the phone call is costing
        them at most $0.20/minute or $12.00 per hour.  The person calling
        is making at most another $12.00 per hour.  I value my personal
        time at more than $24.00 per hour, so it isn't worth it to me to
        keep them on the line--it costs me more than it costs them.

        Letting automated messages run on is worth it because I don't
        stick around to listen.

        Re: .10

        Call restrictions placed by one state won't have much effect as
        long as calls between states are, in many cases, less expensive
        than calls inside of a state.

        					B.J.