[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

2442.0. "Q3 Financial Results" by GRANMA::PTHUMAN () Fri Apr 02 1993 13:02

    When will Digital release Q3 financial results?  Any specific dates we
    should pay attention to stock activity?
    
    -- Paul
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2442.1guessMEMIT::SILVERBERG_MMark Silverberg MLO1-5/B98Fri Apr 02 1993 13:053
    I would guess on or about the 14th of April
    Mark
    
2442.2Are we breaking-even ???????ELMAGO::JMORALESFri Apr 02 1993 16:164
    Will we break-even, as has been committed to our top management to
    Wall-Street ?   If we do not get close to + $10M to - $10M range we
    are in very deep trouble !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
2442.3Q3 worries.....DCOFS::ALSTONWed Apr 07 1993 19:2315
    re: .2
    
    
    Break even?????
    
    with 18 new vice presidents.....
    
    ...... moving Mass.. offices
    
    ...... TFSO 
    
    ...... etc....etc...etc......
    
    
    ..............it's the only positive thing we can hope for.........
2442.4SCCAT::SHERRILLWed Apr 07 1993 23:053
    
    Has anyone noticed the stock is slowly creeping down the last few
    weeks?? Wonder if there is any connection????
2442.5SUBURB::THOMASHThe Devon DumplingThu Apr 08 1993 09:3411
    
>    Has anyone noticed the stock is slowly creeping down the last few
>    weeks?? Wonder if there is any connection????

	It seemed like moving around between 46-41 to me.

	Its 43.5 at the moment, about half-way, other technology stocks
	have been doing the same thing too.


	Heather
2442.6XLIB::SCHAFERMark Schafer, ISV Tech. SupportThu Apr 08 1993 14:057
    I would not worry about Q3.  One quarter by itself isn't very
    significant.  If we had 2 quarters in the black, good.  If we had 2
    good, then 2 bad, not good.  "Profitable growth" is a goal which will
    take awhile.  I doubt that Bob Palmer's goal is simply to be profitable
    in Q393.
    
    Mark
2442.7NYAAPS::CORBISHLEYDavid Corbishley 321-5128Thu Apr 08 1993 18:062
Didn't the stock market go down 80+ points last week?  That is more of the cause
than any speculation on our results.  We we up 2+ points yesterday (4/7).
2442.8Who's doing all that SELLING?35261::LANGSTONRevenge of the Pitt Bull ImitatorThu Apr 08 1993 22:132
    And down 2+ points again today. This yo-yo action could make a person
    nervous.
2442.9What's 5% between friends?LASSIE::HERBISONB.J.Fri Apr 09 1993 13:1514
>    This yo-yo action could make a person nervous.

        I've been watching Digital stock for about ten years (my tenure
        with the company) and my impression is that it has been less
        volatile in the last four years than it was previously.  In the
        mid eighties I seem to remember 10% up or down moves several
        times a week.  Of course, the general trend was up so the drops
        weren't cause for worry.

        This recollection could just be a figment of my memory.  If you
        want to investigate this, somewhere in SUBWAY::DIGITAL_INVESTING
        is a pointer to historical DEC stock price information.

        					B.J.
2442.10Recent good news makes me nervious about pending bad newsJACOBI::JACOBIPaul A. Jacobi - OpenVMS AXP DevelopmentFri Apr 09 1993 13:317
There's been a flood of good news press releases this week about Alpha.  I 
think this could be to cushion the possible bad new due next week.


								-Paul
 
2442.11A "happy" fluctuation story.STAR::PARKETrue Engineers Combat ObfuscationFri Apr 09 1993 13:3917
    I remember nervous in early 1982.  The second line manager (fairly well
    paid at the time) at the company DEC was renting me to had just sold his
    stock, because of the fluctuation.


    He was a former Digit (had taken the government soldering exam so he
    could program the PDP-6).

    He had bought 600 shares the before DEC went public, and 600 shares
    the day we went public.

    Then he sold none until 1982, when he sold all he had (after splits,
    etc) as the DAILY fluctuation of his holdings was greater than his
    ANNUAL salary.

    That kind of fluctuation I could stand }8-)}

2442.12NACAD::NISKALAThe Red Sox cause Achy Breaky HeartFri Apr 09 1993 16:453
    	USA Today has a blurb that DEC stock dropped due to an announcement
    that Q3 results will be less than anticipated. What is the stock doing
    today?  VTX livewire has Friday's opening price as CLOSED!!!  Hmmmmm.
2442.13GRANMA::MWANNEMACHERBeing a Daddy=The best jobFri Apr 09 1993 16:527
    
    I believe that market is closed today for Good Friday.  The investor
    services stock quote shows the last update to be yesterday.
    
    
    
    Mike
2442.14Q3 Numbers are outCVG::THOMPSONRadical CentralistWed Apr 14 1993 15:26186
	Worldwide News                      LIVE WIRE

                    Digital reports six percent revenue growth
                 and improved operating results for third quarter

  Digital today reported results for its third quarter, which ended 
  March 27, 1993.

  For the quarter, the company reported total operating revenues of 
  $3,453,676,000, up 6 percent from the $3,252,514,000 of the comparable 
  quarter a year ago.  The company reported a net loss for the quarter of 
  $30,121,000, compared with a net loss of $311,306,000 for the comparable 
  quarter a year ago.  Per share results for the quarter were a loss of $.23 
  versus a loss of $2.50 for the third quarter of fiscal 1992.

  For the nine months ended March 27, 1993, the company reported total 
  operating revenues of $10,457,418,000, up 4 percent from the $10,025,088,000 
  of the comparable period a year ago.  Net loss for the first nine months of 
  fiscal 1993 was $364,526,000, versus a loss for the similar period a year ago 
  of $940,375,000, which includes a $485,495,000 charge for a change in 
  accounting principles related to postretirement health benefits.  Per share 
  results were a loss of $2.81 versus a loss of $7.55 for the first nine months 
  of fiscal 1992.

  "We are meeting the goals we have set for ourselves in returning Digital to 
  profitability and growth," said President and CEO Bob Palmer.  "Our overall 
  operating results continue to show improvement, quarter to quarter.  For the 
  first time in six quarters, we generated positive cash flow from operations 
  and investments, even with restructuring activities and the loss.  While 
  maintaining our focus on costs we must continue the changes underway both in 
  our organization and our product offerings, which are designed to restore 
  revenue growth."

  "We are encouraged by our transformation to a market driven, customer focused 
  company.  We are confident that our strategy -- to provide customers with the 
  best solutions and to provide the best technology in core areas of competence 
  -- is the right strategy for our customers, partners, shareholders, and 
  employees," Bob continued.

  "The rollout of our Alpha AXP program continues on schedule. This is a major 
  program that will take several quarters to fully implement, but this past 
  quarter we passed several significant milestones.  We launched our unified 
  UNIX operating system program, including commercial availability of OSF/1 on 
  the AXP platform.  We announced availability of mixed cluster capability nine 
  months ahead of our schedule.  Mitsubishi Electronics announced that they 
  will be a second source for Alpha AXP chips, and Novell announced that its 
  network operating system, NetWare, will run in native mode on Alpha AXP 
  systems in the future.  In addition, five major database vendors have 
  announced availability of their databases under UNIX on the Alpha AXP 
  architecture.  More than 500 Alpha AXP applications from partners and 50 
  layered software products from Digital are available today.  In total, more 
  than 1000 vendors are moving more than 2000 applications to this next 
  generation, 64-bit computing environment," Bob concluded.

  "Total revenues were up 6 percent from the comparable quarter last year," 
  said Bill Steul, vice president and chief financial officer.  "Without 
  the favorable impact of foreign exchange rate movements our revenues would 
  have been essentially flat.  Our PC business doubled year over year, as we 
  expanded our presence at the desktop. Our service revenues grew 12 percent 
  driven by strength in our systems integration business around the world.  
  Customers increasingly rely on us for consulting expertise in helping them 
  apply technology solutions to their business problems.  Even with the 
  competitive environment we were able to ship substantially more units, 
  keeping our product revenues essentially flat." 

  "Our strong cost control efforts continue to be reflected in our operating 
  results.  Research and engineering spending declined by 19 percent from the 
  comparable quarter a year ago and sales, general and administrative spending 
  declined 8 percent from the comparable period as we continue to move to a 
  competitive business model.  In addition, total worldwide population 
  declined by 4,000 to 98,100 at the end of the third quarter.  Total 
  population has declined by nearly 16,000 since the beginning of this fiscal 
  year.  Our balance sheet remains strong with a low debt ratio, substantial 
  cash balance of $1.6 billion and total asset turns continuing to improve," 
  Bill concluded.

  After the end of the quarter, the company issued $250M in 30 year debentures 
  at 7 3/4%, priced to yield 7.88% to maturity.  This debt offering represented 
  the remaining unissued amount under the company's $1 billion shelf 
  registration filed last August.  The debt was rated A2 by Moody's Investor 
  Services and A+ by Standard & Poors.


    				       THREE MONTHS ENDED
    			         MARCH 27, 1993	 MARCH 28, 1992

PRODUCT SALES			 $1,767,372,000	 $1,750,448,000
SERVICE & OTHER REVENUES	  1,686,304,000	  1,502,066,000
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES	  3,453,676,000	  3,252,514,000
COST OF PRODUCT SALES		  1,049,969,000	  1,022,790,000
SERVICE EXPENSE			  1,030,728,000	    961,272,000
TOTAL COST OF SALES		  2,080,697,000	  1,984,062,000
  GROSS MARGIN                            39.8%           39.0%
RESEARCH & ENGINEERING		    350,423,000	    432,701,000
SELLING, GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 1,050,600,000	  1,138,603,000
OPERATING LOSS                      (28,044,000)   (302,852,000)
  OPERATING MARGIN                        (.8)%          (9.3)%
INTEREST INCOME                      16,325,000      16,846,000
INTEREST EXPENSE 	             16,402,000       5,300,000
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES	    (28,121,000)   (291,306,000)
  PRE-TAX MARGIN                          (.8)%          (9.0)%
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES	      2,000,000      20,000,000
NET LOSS			   $(30,121,000)  $(311,306,000)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
 OUTSTANDING			    131,553,881     124,671,305
NET LOSS PER SHARE			 $ (.23)      $   (2.50)

    				        NINE MONTHS ENDED
    		                  MARCH 27, 1993  MARCH 28,1992

PRODUCT SALES			  $5,502,427,000 $5,552,684,000
SERVICE & OTHER REVENUES	   4,954,991,000  4,472,404,000
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES	  10,457,418,000 10,025,088,000
COST OF PRODUCT SALES		   3,186,464,000  3,028,059,000
SERVICE EXPENSE                    3,106,648,000  2,798,286,000
TOTAL COST OF SALES		   6,293,112,000  5,826,345,000
  GROSS MARGIN                             39.8%	  41.9%
RESEARCH & ENGINEERING		   1,160,743,000  1,268,657,000
SELLING, GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE  3,359,093,000  3,377,688,000
OPERATING LOSS                      (355,530,000)  (447,602,000)
  OPERATING MARGIN		          (3.4)%         (4.5)%  
INTEREST INCOME  	              43,750,000     71,729,000
INTEREST EXPENSE                      32,746,000     27,853,000
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES &
 CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE	    		   
 IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE	    (344,526,000)  (403,726,000)
  PRE-TAX MARGIN                          (3.3)%         (4.0)%
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES	      20,000,000     51,154,000
LOSS BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT 
 OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE  (364,526,000)  (454,880,000)
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN          
 ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE,NET OF TAX    	 ---	    485,495,000       
NET LOSS			   $(364,526,000) $(940,375,000)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING  129,570,101    124,588,374
LOSS PER SHARE AFTER TAXES		        
 BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF
 CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE         $  (2.81)       $(3.65) 
LOSS PER SHARE ON CUMULATIVE
 EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING 
 PRINCIPLE            	       		    ---          (3.90)
NET LOSS PER SHARE                      $  (2.81)       $(7.55)


                     BALANCE SHEET - Q3 FY93

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS.................. DLRS  1,552,087,000
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET.................       3,009,314,000     

  A.R. DAYS SALES OUTSTANDING 		  	    78 DAYS

INVENTORIES:  RAW MATERIALS......... 358,128,000
              WORK IN PROCESS....... 569,258,000 
              FINISHED GOODS........ 887,490,000  
                       
                       TOTAL............. DLRS  1,814,876,000 

PREPAID EXPENSES.........................         368,514,000        

DEFERRED INCOME TAX CHARGES, NET.........         222,794,000     

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS.....................       6,967,585,000
NET PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT..........       3,239,999,000
TOTAL ASSETS.............................      10,944,959,000
BANK LOANS & CURRENT PORTION OF LTD......          40,164,000	 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES................       4,215,514,000
DEFERRED TAX CREDITS, NET................          23,033,000
LONG-TERM DEBT...........................         777,326,000
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS..................       1,223,046,000
TOTAL LIABILITIES........................       6,238,919,000
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.....................       4,706,040,000
BOOK VALUE PER SHARE.....................               35.75    
CAPITAL SPENDING (INVESTMENT IN PP&E)- Q3         101,956,000
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION......... - Q3         215,070,000
CAPITAL SPENDING (INVESTMENT IN PP&E)-YTD         358,419,000
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION......... -YTD         629,233,000
NON U.S. REVENUES - QTR..................       2,241,096,000       
                                                      or  65%                 
NON U.S. REVENUES - YTD..................       6,714,782,000
                                                      or  64%
TOTAL EMPLOYEE POPULATION APPROXIMATELY..              98,100


---
NetWare is a registered trademark of Novell, Inc.
OSF/1 is a registered trademark of Open Software Foundation, Inc.
UNIX is a registered trademark of UNIX System Laboratories,Inc.
2442.15"Now ... the _rest_ of the story"SOFBAS::SHERMANWed Apr 14 1993 16:2847
		"Hello? Hello? Anybody home??"



	The latest results indicate that planned cost savings 
	are not occurring:

	FOR THE QUARTER/same quarter last year:

	Product sales:			+   0.9%
	Service and other revenue:	+  12.2%
	Total operating revenue:	+   6.1%
	
	Total cost of sales:		+   4.9%
	Gross margin:			+   2.1%


	Further:

	FOR NINE MONTHS ending Q3 this year/last year:

	Product sales:			-   1.0%
	Service and other revenue:	+  10.7%
	Total operating revenue:	+   4.3%

	[i.e. hardware is not yet producing increased revenue]
	
	Total cost of sales:		+   8.0%

	[i.e. COS increasing at twice the rate of revenue increase]
	
	Gross margin:			-   5.1%

	SG&A:				-   0.6%

	Savings per employee cut in
	last nine months:		$1,162 ea


	In other words, cutting 16K people in the past nine months has 
	saved the company an average of $ 1,162 in SG&A for each person 
	cut. This is appalling. Whatever the reason for the intractability 
	of personnel expense, these figures suggest that it is not 
	meaningfully related to the number of people working at DEC. 


2442.16questionBOOKS::HAMILTONAll models are false; some are useful - Dr. G. BoxWed Apr 14 1993 16:5416
    
    re: .15
    
    I'm not a financial expert (nor do I play one on TV), but
    with regard to the savings in SG&A expense per employee
    cut: if we were heavily cutting GMA headquarters folks
    (as opposed to field sales/services folks), wouldn't
    that reflect differently on your number?  In other words,
    are headquarters people costs accounted for in SG&A, or
    is it only field employees and management?
    
    Would the SG&A "costs per employee cut" have been higher
    or lower depending on the function of those employees?
    
    Glenn                                    
    
2442.17CREATIVE ACCOUNTING?SWAM2::KLINE_STWed Apr 14 1993 17:405
    RE:.15
    
    isn't there some saying about figures and liars.....
    
    :-)
2442.18I might be dumb, but I'm not stupid!AIMHI::KERRWed Apr 14 1993 17:529
    
    
    .15
    
    
    I guess that's why Time magazine called it "DUMBSIZING".  Kind of fits,
    doesn't it.
    
    
2442.19Life's never as simple as thatTRUCKS::WINWOODThu Apr 15 1993 08:198
    I do not believe SG & A only consists of people related 'admin'
    costs.  Other significant items like Allowances appear in there
    as well.  Given the change in sales to direct channels and so
    called Street pricing we should be careful about reading the change
    to SG & A and attributing it solely to staff reduction.
    
    Calvin (By no means a Finance person [Standard Disclaimer #24A])
    
2442.20NopeMRKTNG::BROCKSon of a BeechThu Apr 15 1993 12:271
    Allowances are NOT in SG&A.
2442.21The Economist sees hopeNSDC::RATCLIFFHeisenberg may have been hereMon Apr 19 1993 07:1498
The following article appeared in The Economist, April 17th, 1993,
in the Business section, pp. 67--70. All typos mine. Copied without
permission.

                        Digital Equipment Corporation
                                  Finger out

A year ago, he was vowing to be around for ages. Six months later, Ken
Olsen, the 67-year-old president and founder of Digital Equipment
Corporation -- America's third-biggest computer company -- was out on
his ear. After recording a $617m net loss in the year to June 1991,
Digital plunged $2.8 billion into the red in 1992. As protective as ever
about the minicomputer firm he founded 36 years ago in an old wooden
mill west of Boston, Mr Olsen could not bring himself to fire 25,000
employees and colleagues as critics were demanding. So Mr Olsen was
fired instead.

The new management at Digital has wasted no time. Factories have been
shut, workers axed and overheads trimmed. The company's head-count, some
126,000 at its recent high, was down to 98,000 by December [sic]. A
further 13,000 workers will have gone by June. Two weeks ago Robert
Palmer, Digital's new president and chief executive, announced that even
the old mill at Maynard, Massachusetts, would close. ``The idiosyncratic
structure around Ken Olsen is being vaporised,'' notes William Bluestein
of Forrester Research, a consultancy in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Like mainframe-computer makers such as IBM, minicomputer firms have seen
networks of cheap little personal computers and workstations steal their
market. Yet Hewlett-Packard, founded at much the same time as Digital,
saw the writing on the wall in the mid-1980s and changed direction
smartly. The Californian firm hurried out a range of minicomputers based
on a stripped-down RISC (reduced-instruction-set computing) design,
snapped up a major workstation supplier and launched a laser printer
business that has become the envy of the PC world. Where Digital has
been losing billions, Hewlett-Packard has been posting heady profits.

The bloated years under Mr Olsen were Digital's undoing. In the year to
the end of June 1992, the firm's operating expenses gobbled up 44% of
revenues, compared with less than 20% a decade ago (see chart). This has
changed dramatically under the new management. The firm's third-quarter
results, published on April 14th, confirm that Digital has now turned
the corner. Net losses have declined steadily during the current fiscal
year: from $261m in the first quarter to $74m in the second and now $30m
in the third. Sales have picked up, while overheads should have been
pared by $1.4 billion during this financial year. Digital is still
likely to lose $350m in the year to June, but 1994 should see a strong
recovery.

Two things, one managerial, the other technical, give cause for
optimism. On taking over, Mr Palmer warned everyone that the high-margin
years at Digital had gone for good; customers were now firmly in charge.
Henceforth, Digital would be putting greater emphasis on services,
software and networks -- and less on churning out minicomputers. More
important, the firm has now restructured itself into nine business units
that concentrate either on selling to specific industries or on clearly
defined product areas. From next July, these units will become
independent profit centres.

The second reason for expecting Digital to bounce back strongly is
Alpha, its new 64-bit RISC microprocessor. The company bungled badly
when it announced this scorching new microprocessor a year before it was
ready to ship Alpha-based products. Sales of its bread-and-butter range
of VAX minicomputers stalled as customers shelved plans for new machines
until hearing how the Alpha chip would be used.

The wait is over. The first Alpha-based computers, which will range from
$15,000 workstations to $316,000 machines of mainframe class began
trickling out of Digital's factories late last year -- along with news
that recent VAXes can be upgraded to full-blooded Alpha machines.
Reassured that they were not buying soon-to-be-obsolete computers,
customers have started buying VAXes again while waiting for the bigger
Alphas to arrive. As a result, Digital's sales rose to $3.4 billion in
the latest quarter, 6% more than a year earlier.

None of this will slow the worldwide trend among computer users to
``open systems'' and networks of lowly PCs. Fed-up with being locked
into a single supplier's proprietary (read expensive) computer system,
customers have begun stringing together lots of different makes of
machines all sharing the same software and data. Mr Olsen took the first
reluctant steps towards making Digital's proprietary VMS operating
system (the internal software that runs a computer) more open to other
makers' machines. More significantly, Digital has now backed OSF/1, the
widely accepted version of the popular Unix operating system and has
even promised to embrace the new Windows NT operating system that
Microsoft is preparing to launch for networked PCs. 

Alpha may be Digital's trump card in the open systems game. ``Alpha's
single greatest promise is not its speed, but its chameleon-like
behaviour that allows it to run equally well with any operating
system,'' says Chris Christiansen of International Data Corporation, a
market-research firm in Framingham, Massachusetts. The only proviso,
says Mr Christiansen, is that ``religion doesn't get in the way''. By
which he means that, for all the change, the towering genius of Ken
Olsen still casts a long, proprietary shadow over the way Digital
thinks.

Charts: sales, costs and net profit/loss from 1983 to 1993.
Pictures: The Mill and its clock (Caption: Troubled mill).
2442.22More on P&L StatementsCTOAVX::OAKESIts DEJA VU all over againThu Apr 22 1993 16:5916
    Expanding on .20:
    
    >Allowances are NOT in SG&A.
    
    That is correct.  Allowances are on the second line of the Profit/Loss 
    statement.  The first line is Gross Sales, which is the total sales at 
    List Price.  The second line shows amounts for Returns, Allowances and 
    Discounts.  This is per Financial Accounting Standards so that an analyst 
    can have a better idea of the delta between list price and selling price.
    
    This difference is the Gross profit from which are taken Cost of Goods
    sold, SG&A etc.  That figure is the Pre-tax profit, from which taxes
    are taken,  resulting in the after tax profit or (loss) number. 
    
    
    KO