[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:TAEC::BEROUD
Created:Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:6497
Total number of notes:27359

2254.0. "QUESTIONS - DECmcc Alarm/GETEVENT" by BIS1::COLLEYE () Mon Feb 03 1992 14:19

Hello,

I have two questions regarding the DECmcc alarm/event logger.
I would be very grateful if someone could provide me with an answer.

Thank you,

Maurice.


HW: VAX 6430
SW: VMS 5.5
    DECmcc V1.1

QUESTIONS
=========

1. - We have defined the remote and local sink so that we can receive/
     handle event (among which we pass the "Counters Zeroed" event: 0.9)
   - The remote sink node is the same as the local sink node; i.e. the
     node which DECmcc is installed on (TPLAB/MONITOR).
   - I can create an alarm rule for that node (from iconic map:
         - rule expression 4
         - entity NODE4 TPLAB
         - Event name "Counters Zeroed")
   - I can create an alarm rule for a circuit of that node (from iconic map:
         - rule expression 4
         - entity NODE4 TPLAB CIRCUIT BNA-0
         - Event name "Counters Zeroed")
   - I can also issue the directive for the node
        GETEVENT NODE4 TPLAB Counters Zeroed, AT START...
   - I can also issue the directive for of that node 
        GETEVENT NODE4 TPLAB CIRCUIT BNA-0 Counters Zeroed, AT START...
   - If I Zero the circuit BNA-0 for the node TPLAB, I get the appropriate 
     alarm notification and the GETEVENT displays the event that occured,
     proving that the event is properly passed and captured.
   - If I Zero the node TPLAB, I DO NOT get the appropriate alarm notification 
     and the GETEVENT DOES NOT display the event that occured.
   Question: what is the difference of the handling the same event (0.9) for
             a node and a circuit of that node ? Is it a Decnet/DECmcc
             bug or supported feature and is ther a DECnet/DECmcc patch
             or work=around


2. - The DECmcc DECnet Phase IV Access Module Use states (p D-2) the 
     GETEVENT directive must be issued with an AT qualifier (unless the
     directive obtains only the next occurence of a requested event).
   Question: what is the exact AT qualifier to be used so that no
             event is lost. I tried 
             "AT START = (start-time) EVERY 00:01:00" but if I zero the
             the counters twice in a minute, GETEVENT only captures the
             first event occurence.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2254.1Problem 2 solvedTOOK::ORENSTEINMon Feb 03 1992 17:0521
Hi
    
    Issue #2 does look like a documentation error. It is filed as QAR 2248
    in the MCC_INTERNAL QAR system.  The docementation should say that the
    GETEVENT should be issued with the FOR DURATION qualifier.
    
    This will gather events for the specified duration of time.
    
    Syntax:
    
    	GETEVENT NODE foo <some event>, FOR DURATION = (10:00)
    
    	Get the event over the next 10 hours.
    

    Issue #1 is not an ALARMS issue.  I will see that an appropriate person
    	answers your note.
    
    		aud...
    
    
2254.2remote node child entity receives counters zeroed eventTOOK::CALLANDERMCC = My Constant CompanionTue Feb 11 1992 14:514
    zeroing counters on the local node, still reports them against the
    REMOTE NODE child entity. The rule as you have it stated shows
    the rule is on the parent entity.
    
2254.3OK.. But I do not understandBIS1::COLLEYEWed Feb 12 1992 06:5416
    Thank you very much for your solution... It works.
    
    But I do not understand why the event is reported on the remote entity
    rather than on the global entity (on which the event has been
    generated). Is it explained somewhere in the Alarm FM use ?
    
    I would be very grateful if you could explain me or provide me
    with a documentation pointer. 
    
    The reason of my question is that: is this solution applicable for
    the "Counters Zeroed" event or for all the NODE4 events ?
    
    In advance thank you for your reply.
    
    Maurice.
    
2254.4DNA4 defines events, not rulesTOOK::CALLANDERMCC = My Constant CompanionWed Feb 26 1992 13:2118
    
    This should be documented in the DNA4 manual. It is the
    decnet phase 4 implmentation that determines how/where 
    events are reported. 
    
    The returning of the event against the remote node child entity has
    nothing to do with alarms. But....since architectures/implementations
    don't always meet mangement needs/expectations; for this reason
    we have added the targetting functions. do the following to get the
    visible results that you are interested in.
    
    ASSIGN TARGET DOMAIN name EVENT SOURCE="DOMAIN name RULE name", 
    	EVENT NAME = "ANY NOTIFICATION EVENT",
    	MANAGED OBJECT = "NODE4 #1 REMOTE NODE #2",
    	TARGET ENTITY = "NODE4 #2"
    
    Jill