[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference trucks::football;1

Title: Soccer Football Conference
Notice:Don't forget your season ticket.....
Moderator:MOVIES::PLAYFORD
Created:Thu Aug 08 1991
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:608
Total number of notes:85903

129.0. "World Cup qualifying Group 2" by GALVIA::SPAIN (There's always the U.S.) Mon Dec 09 1991 20:41

    This topic is reserved for discussing European World Cup qualifying
        Group 2.
    
        The group consists of
    
    			England
    			Holland
    			Poland
    			Norway
    			Turkey
    			San Marino
    
    Gary.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
129.1What's their strengthBONNET::ZIJLI think I can, I think I can,.....,I didTue Dec 10 1991 15:067
    I've read a lot about Poland and Norway being nasty opponents. And the
    results show it. What is in fact the strength of these teams. The
    English should be familiar with the Polish strength. What is it that
    makes these teams so tough, to my knowledge they don't have very much
    top players??????????????????
    
    Rob
129.2Tough to play in OsloGOTA1::APPELQVISTTue Dec 10 1991 15:3810
129.3negotiationsBONNET::ZIJLThe one who always loses his SODEXHO cardWed Dec 11 1991 15:555
    Delegations from England, Poland, Norway, Turky and San Marino wil come
    to Amssterdam january 20th to negotiate the dates for the matches to be
    played.
    
    Rob
129.4great drawESSB::BREEThu Dec 12 1991 15:404
    It looks like a very easy group for England who should win out
    comfortably.
    
    Paul
129.5Are you sure????????????BONNET::ZIJLThe one who always loses his SODEXHO cardThu Dec 12 1991 15:478
    reply 129.4
    
    Aren't you a bit to optimistic Paul. I know England has a good team,
    but so do Holland and Poland (they sure gave you the shivers in the EC
    qualifitactions). And from what I heard Norway can be a tough opponent 
    playing at home.
    
    Rob
129.6QETOO::CHAVESa broken clock is right twice a dayFri Dec 13 1991 00:125
    I agree England should qualify along with Holland but not as easy as
    Paul thinks. 
    
    JC
    
129.7turkeymaniaVOGON::LINEYSat Dec 28 1991 01:405
    I cannot believe England have drawn Poland and Turkey in the same group
    yet again.  ITS A FIX!  Does anybody know if another clan of countries
    keep getting drawn together.  England and Holland will qualify at a
    canter against the sheer quality of San Marino and alike.
    
129.8Wait a bit longer for the fixture listRDGE31::POWELLCSomething incredibly wittyFri Jan 10 1992 11:324
According to yesterday's Guardian, the respective managers will now meet on
February 14th to agree their fixtures.

	Chris.	
129.9Satisfaction...UTROP1::MIJNLIEFF_KOrangie, Blangie, Blue !Tue Jan 14 1992 19:185
    The whole of Footballmindend Holland reacted positive to the opponents
    in this group. Personally I think Holland and England should be able to
    qualify. I hope the qualification games won't be as boring as the were
    for the EC (sweden). 
    Kees
129.10FixturesRDGE30::POWELLCSomething incredibly wittyThu Feb 20 1992 15:1433
    Here are the fixtures for this group...
    
    
09-Sep-1992		Norway		v	San Marino
23-Sep-1992		Norway		v	Holland
23-Sep-1992		Poland		v	Turkey
07-Oct-1992		San Marino	v	Norway
14-Oct-1992		Holland		v	Poland
14-Oct-1992		England		v	Norway
28-Oct-1992		Turkey		v	San Marino
18-Nov-1992		England		v	Turkey
16-Dec-1992		Turkey		v	Holland
17-Feb-1993		England		v	San Marino
24-Feb-1993		Holland		v	Turkey
10-Mar-1993		San Marino	v	Turkey
24-Mar-1993		Holland		v	San Marino
31-Mar-1993		Turkey		v	England
28-Apr-1993		England		v	Holland
28-Apr-1993		Norway		v	Turkey
28-Apr-1993		Poland		v	San Marino
19-May-1993		San Marino	v	Poland
29-May-1993		Poland		v	England
02-Jun-1993		Norway		v	England
09-Jun-1993		Holland		v	Norway
08-Sep-1993		England		v	Poland
22-Sep-1993		San Marino	v	Holland
22-Sep-1993		Norway		v	Poland
13-Oct-1993		Holland		v	England
13-Oct-1993		Poland		v	Norway
27-Oct-1993		Turkey		v	Poland
10-Nov-1993		Turkey		v	Norway
10-Nov-1993		San Marino	v	England
10-Nov-1993		Poland		v	Holland
129.11Turkey is getting better and betterBODRUM::ERKUSSun Jun 21 1992 00:3719
    
    Hi Guys
    
    Please dont forget Turkey. Check their recent games and scores.
    
    Luxembourg - Turkey  2.3
    Turkey     - Danemark 1.2
    Germany    - Turkey   1.0  Germany was lucky and Goal Keeper was also
                               great. Waiting for next time
    
    SO Sepp Piontek has been creating a new young national team.
    Turkey is COMING guys....
    
    regards
    
    Gokhan...
    
    
      
129.12Turks will give a tough game SALES::THILLMon Jun 22 1992 19:2912
    I have to agree with the last note. In the 1990 qualifiers, Turkey came
    reasonably close to qualifying. Of course they had to beat the USSR
    away, which they couldn't do, but the Turks defeinitely moved away
    from the "minnows." The Euro 92 qualifiers were dissapointing, but with
    a little luck Turkey would have come away with some points from a tough
    group.
    
    Also, Turkish clubs have done well in the last few years in European
    Compwtitions, making in to the later rounds. I think one club (Galastasaray
    maybe?) made it to the final 8 of one of the cups this year.
    
    Tom
129.13last scoreBODRUM::ERKUSMon Aug 31 1992 19:1811
    
    I would like to inform you guys that Turkey win it's last game.
    
    Turkey 3  Bulgaria 2
    
    I think Turkey will not be easy team to win BUT I dont think they can
    get it to Finals.
    
    What do you think about first game:  Poland vs Turkey
    
    Gokhan
129.14Two figures for NorwayGOTA1::APPELQVISTIf it don't stink, don't stirFri Sep 11 1992 12:0515
    
    Norway   -    San Marino
    
     10		     0
    
    I saw the goals on Eurosport last night and some of them where really
    crackers! Goal #10 (i think) came from a corner, and a Norwegian
    forward healed (sp?) it on volley in to the net. A goal you make one in
    a lifetime.
    
    Norway must be concidered as a dangerous opponent. San Marino is not a
    good team, but to score ten goals against them takes some skill. And
    Norway did play well.
    
    Mats 
129.15SIOG::SPENCERPeter Spencer @DBO 827-2286Fri Sep 11 1992 13:401
    Nice shirts too ;-)
129.16Heia Norge!!!GOTA1::APPELQVISTIf it don't stink, don't stirThu Sep 24 1992 16:0411
    
    Well, well, our friends from the west did it again!! Beated Holland
    2-1, and reports says that they deserved the victory. Norway travels to
    San Marino next time, and a week later they face England. Any fears
    from the Brittish, or are you as confident as you where before EURO-92?
    
    Mats
    
    PS.  Another result; Poland - Turkey   1 - 0
    
    PPS. Any comments from Holland? Was the game live in dutch TV?
129.17Very WorryingSUBURB::DURANTSThu Sep 24 1992 17:1312
    
    Graham Failure is apparently "undaunted" by Norway's recent form.
    However, he was exactly the same before England played Sweden in the
    European Championship Finals.
    
    Impossible to tell what England's midfield will be after the Spanish
    defeat. Beardsley may return to partner Shearer in attack. Gazza looked
    promising in the Lazio V Spurs friendly, but was not fit enough to play
    a full game. Otherwise it appears there are no real outstanding ball players
    available.
    
    				Steve.
129.18UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funThu Sep 24 1992 17:2023
rep -2

Mats,

I only saw the first half and based on that I can't say the Norwegians impressed
me, they gained a quick lead after 10 minutes with a penalty but Bergkamp
equilised for Holland in the same minute.

I think the Dutch problem is the defence, against Italia two weeks ago they
played with only two defenders and against Norway with four but only two can
be considered as real defenders, it's impossible to play  inetrnational footy
this way in this time 'cause time after time you will get slaughtered.

I hope the new manager (Dick Advocaat) will make some changes 'cause there
are loads of good and strong defenders in Holland.

the other problem is our goal-keeper, Menzo might be ok for Ajax but I think
he can't take the pressure, always in importatnt games he will at least make
1 or 2 crucial mistakes, last season against the Italians in the UEFA cup proved
that, ajax were leading two goals to nothing and within no time he flunkes
twice and the score was 2-2, ajax then was lucky they scored another goal.

T_
129.19moved for your convenienceIMBUSY::SPAINThere's always the U.S.Thu Sep 24 1992 17:2486
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 261.0                   NORWAY - HOLLAND  2 - 1                     1 reply
ELIS::GEELEN                                         80 lines  24-SEP-1992 13:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NORWAY - HOLLAND  2 - 1    

Last night I watched the World Cup qualification match between NORWAY and 
HOLLAND and again 'we' (the Dutch) played a very poor game.
From the kick-off until the final whistle, 'we' had absolutely no chance 
of winning the match.

After the match I watched Sport Studio, to see what "Dick"-(if you know what I
mean)-Advocaat had to say about the game.

...Well I was very surprised, when I heard him talk about the game.
Dick said that 'we' had about 4 or 5 big chances in the first half ????, what
was he talking about ??

I could only recall 2 chances for Holland in the whole game : 
-------------------------------------------------------------

- Number 1  The goal of Dennis Bergkamp
- Number 2  A header of Wim Kieft late in the second half   

Which match did Dick see than ?
Does he know anything about football ?
Actually he didn't talk about the terrible performance  of some players during
the match.(Sonny Silooy, Danny Blind, Rob Witschge (or whatever), Johnny van 
't Schip and even Marco van Basten)
He thought we performed reasonable; the only thing I saw was a very boring and
poor game (since 1988 we didn't play a good match, perhaps only on the EC in
Sweden against Germany)

When we started playing the Ajax system, with all the Ajax players we only
performed poor game's perhaps a new coach,system and new players would change
all this.
 
The first day I heard that Dick was going to be the new Coach of the Dutch
National team, I thought : "Are they crazy at the KNVB ?"
What has Dick ever accomplished , (if you know something then please tell me).

He was the former coach of Haarlem and SVV, I know that much.
(Why not make Leen Looyen Coach of the national team,I'd say (little joke
ofcourse)

At SVV he (Dick) run away at the end of the season, which saved the team from 
dropping to the first division.
After that the KNVB thinks it's a logical step to make him assistant of Rinus 
Michels and after Rinus retires they simply make Dick the new head coach.

Well last night I saw the consequences of their failure.
Dick puts Stanley Menzo in the goal instead of Ed de Goey.
Since Stanley is our keeper, we lost two matches in a row with 6 goals for our
opponents.
When good old Hans van Breukelen was in the goal this never happened !!

Dick chose Stanley because of the new rules made by the UEFA, but last night 
Frank de Boer headed a ball to him (which he still may catch) and what was his
reaction.... he panicked and headed the ball away, instead of taking it into his
hands. 
A keeper should know the rules !! Stanley doesn't know them apparently.

And then there was Sonny Silooy, after a few year with bad luck he was 'finally'
back in the national team.
But last night I didn't know why he was even selected, because he only made
errors, which lead to chances for the Norwegian team.

Some other major disasters were :
-Danny Blind, only in the team when Berry van Aerle is injured caused a penalty.
-Johnny van 't Schip lost several balls and his effectiveness was below zero.
-Marco van Basten didn't do much.
-And Rob W. was all over the field but never at the right time.

Why weren't Gaston Taument and Arthur Numan in the game instead of for instance
van 't Schip and Witschge.

And why wasn't Gerald Vanenburg even selected for the team, he's in an excellent
form at the moment, someone who is needed in the Dutch team at the moment.

This morning there wasn't much in the papers about the failure of the team and
the coach,... why I don't know!

Well that is all I have to say right know.

129.20moved for your convenienceIMBUSY::SPAINThere's always the U.S.Thu Sep 24 1992 17:2518
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 261.1                   NORWAY - HOLLAND  2 - 1                      1 of 1
UTROP1::JANSEN "Reading Blondes have more fun"       12 lines  24-SEP-1992 13:23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rep -1

Dear Sir,

some of you comments are right but most of it is just crap!!!!!

T_

PS Gary or one of the other moderators please write lock 'cause these things
   only take up space and there is already a topic where this can be discussed.


129.21If only...FORTY2::FOWLERMThu Sep 24 1992 21:4321
re: 17

I've said it before and I'll say it again. I think there are plenty of skill
players in the English league but for various reasons Taylor never picks them.

For example, Chris Waddle, Peter Beardsley, John Salako, Glenn Hoddle (old, but
still the greatest 8-))

Reason One is that Graham Taylor couldn't manage his way out of a paper bag.

Reason Two, and perhaps a more serious one, is that we play too many games. Yawn,
yawn, tired old subject, but it's true. Our best players are always injured,
whether in reality, or merely at the discretion of not very honest managers. It 
takes more practice for these skill players to gel together, and we play way too
many league and cup matches to allow for national squad practice sessions. I
thought one aim of the premier league was to put a bit more emphasis on the
national squad, but it hasn't happened.

Anyway, just my opinions,

Mike
129.22pred: Norway 2 England 1CHEFS::HOUSEBThu Oct 08 1992 11:246
    Norway romped to a 2-0 victory over San Marino to take their run to 3
    wins out of 3.  Next stop Wembley.  Let's hope the English team approach
    this game with their accustomed arrogance - it could make for an
    interesting outcome.
    
    		Brian.
129.23PEKING::NAGLEJThu Oct 08 1992 14:1019
    
    Especially if Graham Failure doesn't play Paul Gasket. Why
    so much should rest on one player is beyond me but it has
    to be said that he does make a difference.
    
    If Waddle will be allowed to have a bash then we could be
    witnessing a good game but England will more than likely
    play their usual crap. Failure will then have enough excuses
    to write a book. The title would be.......
    
    WHY I COULDN'T MANAGE A PI$$ UP IN A BREWERY !!! A THOUSAND 
    REASONS.
    
    I'll give the game to Norway.
    
    Norway 65     England 0
    
    
    JN.
129.24The shape of things to come.ARRODS::OHAGANBDirk, Nasty, Stig, Barry, LeggyThu Oct 08 1992 18:319
    Norway to draw at Wembley and eventually go through to the finals 
    with Holland. Taylor by the end of 1993 will have finally found a 
    team after 4 years and 7000 players. The fact that Geoff Hurst
    is included in preference to Ian Wright comes as no surprise.....  
    
    
    
    
    
129.25GOTA1::APPELQVISTIf it don't stink, don't stirFri Oct 09 1992 12:1313
    
    I'm not a fan of Brittish style football, but i'll tell you one thing;
    They always give 100% effort in every game. There is so many times i've
    read that England played like crap but managed to get a 1-0 win. There
    is so many skillfull players that Taylor could pick out 3-4 teams that
    will beat Norway nine times out of ten. Perhaps there is too many good
    players to choose among.
    
    A coach must experiment and use many plyer for a while, but eventually
    he must find a team that can be trained to play together as a team. My
    hopes is for Norway next week, but i suspect that England win the game.
    
    Mats
129.26A mouthful of talentOSLACT::HENRIKWCheer up with a fadoFri Oct 09 1992 20:3616
    A little piece of trivia:
    
    Before playing Holland, Norway's coach Egil 'Drillo' Olsen
    regretted Gullit's absence, finding "an advantage in facing
    opponents with a bigger name than their actual skills".
    
    Before playing England, he told Sky News that he hoped Gazza
    would play on Wembley, since "it's an advantage to meet players
    with a bigger mouth than talent".
    
    Keep an eye on Mr Olsen's mouth on Wembley next Wednesday... ;^)
    
    
    Henrik                                                
    
     
129.27A mouthful of soapCHEFS::HOUSEBTue Oct 13 1992 11:0814
    I see Gazza has done his bit for Anglo-Scandanavian relations.
    
    A Norwegian journalist was watching England train at Bisham Abbey on
    Sunday.  Afterwards he approached Gazza and asked him if he had any
    message for the people of Norway, Gazza replied "Yeah, F*** off Norway"
    
    Big Lawrie McMenemy stepped in and diffused the situation and said it 
    was a lighthearted comment.  The comment has been widely publicised in
    Norway.  Great move by Gazza, that should really fire the Norwegians up 
    
    Heres hoping they both teams can keep up their recent form.
    Norway 2 England 1
    
    		Brian.
129.28Gazza bad, but not THAT badMOEUR3::SMITHTue Oct 13 1992 12:1717
    
    Hey Brian,
    
      Tell the rest of the story...
    
      Gazza made a full apology to the journalist (who incidently was in
    a restricted are - he shouldn't have been there), who had his cameras
    rolling without having informed anyone.  He also made a full apology to
    the Norwegian people, also explaining that it was OBVIOUSLY a
    light-hearted comment, and later gave a full exclusive interview to the
    same Norwegian reporting team.
    
      That's the full story and doesn't paint Gazza as blackly as your
    reply Brian, however, I still think he was stupid, unthinking and all
    the rest...   I just hope he gets a hatrick.
    
    Ian
129.29CHEFS::HOUSEBTue Oct 13 1992 13:4710
    I just relayed the story as reported in yesterday's Independent.  When
    taken out of context the comment sounds stupid and irresponsible but if
    you had been there and witnessed the light hearted incident I'm sure it
    was very funny.   But it is still the sort of comment which fires up
    the opposition thanks to "constructive journalism".
    
    I'm not trying to portray Gazza as anything in particular, the game
    needs more characters like him.                    
    
    		Brian.
129.30What if...OPG::TONYTue Oct 13 1992 14:154
I just wonder if a foreign player had made the same remark at England..
How would that have ve'been accepted by everyone...for example a German player..!

Tony
129.31Team News?XSTACY::KMCGRATHLong road, patient donkeyTue Oct 13 1992 14:443
Enough about Gaz...what about the rest of the team.

Who's going to be in the english side tomorrow?
129.32Adams...I dont think so.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Oct 13 1992 14:5119
     
    According to numerous papers today the team is:
    
    Woods
    Dixon
    Adams 
    Walker
    Pearce
    Batty
    Ince
    Gascoigne
    Platt
    Shearer
    Wright
    
    Lets hope that Adams is replaced by Pallister and Batty replaced by
    Merson(if fit) or Salako.
    
    Dave...
129.33The DonkeyESSB::BLONGRumbleows &amp; Euro Super Cup Winners 92Tue Oct 13 1992 14:5311
129.34Wright and Shearer......Rampant.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Oct 13 1992 17:236
    
    The team has been announced and it is the one predicted by most of the
    press and is as .32
    
    
    Dave...who cant wait to see Gazza inspire England to a 3-0 win.
129.35Don't ask me about it - its only a predictionMOEUR3::SMITHTue Oct 13 1992 17:466
    
    I had a dream last night, it went something like England beat Norway
    9-0, yup, NINE.  Gazza got four of them, and wait for it, Ian Rush
    another!  (yes I know he's Welsh!)
    
    Some dream!!
129.36TRUCKS::SANTTorpedoed in Moskow....Tue Oct 13 1992 17:5220
129.37The great one returnsSIOG::SPENCERPeter Spencer @DBO 827-2286Tue Oct 13 1992 18:093
    It's great to see that superb footballer back in the English team.
    
    Well deserved and well done Tony!
129.383 men and a donkeyYUPPY::PANESWasn't it fun in room 312Tue Oct 13 1992 18:096

 I'm not sure that Taylor is right in using a flat back four. Maybe he thinks
an extra pair of hooves will come in handy.

 Stuart
129.39Best Wishes...HONEST!!DBOT07::RUSSELLTue Oct 13 1992 19:4610
    I'd like to wish England the very best of luck tomorrow night.
    
    regards,
    
    *TIGER*
    
    PS. ...I mean this most sincerely.
    
    PPS....I really do.
                    
129.40World beware !! Gazza's back....PEKING::COSSEYNWed Oct 14 1992 10:3816
    
    Well England start off there campaign against an inform Norway side
    who to be quite frank couldn't have asked for an easier start, with
    the exception of Holland, but Norway's real test is tonight against
    a strike force that if they were to click could be the most exciting
    in world football with Gazza running at them from midfield Platts late
    runs into the box a three or four nil win won't be surprise so I'm
    going to stick my neck out and go for a scoreline of 
    
    England 4   Norway 0
    Gazza 
    Shearer2
    Wright
     Wright
    
     Neil...
129.41STKOFF::SPERSSONPas de problemeWed Oct 14 1992 12:1534
    
    Well it's always easier to say "I told you so!" when you actually
    have, so I'll stick my neck out too:
    
    So the Most Overrated Footballer in the World makes a come-back. That
    won't make a difference. However:
    
    Seriously, even if England prove time and time again that they are not
    among the World's top teams, they should not have a problem with Norway
    at home.
    
    It is reported in the papers today that the Norwegian people expect   
    a win. Norway have not won an away game against anyone but 4th rate
    opposition for as long as I can remember. I cannot see why a fluky win
    at home against a very disappointing Holland should point in a new
    direction. 
    
    The home advantage in European Football is becoming ever more
    significant (I think this has partly to do with the deteriorating
    standard of refereeing). To be honest Sweden's success in the European
    Chanpionships owes a lot to this fact. Norway are among the teams that
    can cause disturbances at home to any other team (like other 3rd rate
    nations such as Turkey, Finland, Greece, Israel etc) but they will never
    stand a chance of qualifying.
    
    This group will be decided between England, Poland, Holland in their
    internal clashes and it will be a bonus for the others if Norway can
    sneak a point here and there. That's about it.
    
    Now, did I stick my neck out long enough?
    
    	cheers,
    
    		Stefan
129.42OTTTRUCKS::WARDRWed Oct 14 1992 12:387
    RE: all this Gazza gibbering .. I seem to recall the same inordinate
    amount of fuss as to whether Kevin Keegan played in England teams
    or not.   A particularly memorable one, was whether he would play
    against Scotland one year - yes/no/yes/no/yes/no - he did in the
    end and England lost .. nuff said ..
    
    Ray
129.43Most overrated in England......KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameWed Oct 14 1992 12:5011
   Stefan, the way the English team played in Sweeden is the real reason behind
the gazza hype. Not too many people know him outside of England. You wont find
too many non-English people claiming gazza to be the best player in the world.

   Stefan your boys have a chance tonight, not because Norway is a great or
good team no, its just because England are a weak team.

                                                                -dave-

                               
129.44Salako...FORTY2::FOWLERMWed Oct 14 1992 13:048
All this talk about Gazza is very nice, but I think the biggest mistake our man
Taylor has made is not playing Salako. Who is this Ince bloke anyway?

I hope Salako is at least on the bench, so he can be brought on at half time.

John Barnes is dead, long live King John Salako.

Mike
129.45What a sensible note!!YUPPY::PANESDan Quayle? Just say noe!Wed Oct 14 1992 13:1116
                     <<< Note 129.44 by FORTY2::FOWLERM >>>
                                 -< Salako... >-

>All this talk about Gazza is very nice, but I think the biggest mistake our man
>Taylor has made is not playing Salako. Who is this Ince bloke anyway?

>I hope Salako is at least on the bench, so he can be brought on at half time.

>John Barnes is dead, long live King John Salako.

>Mike


 My sentiments entirely. Keep up the good work.

 Stuart
129.46Du gamla, du sjuka...OSLACT::NORLAV::arnekWed Oct 14 1992 13:1314
Re .41  
    
    So, the Most Overrated Country in the World is still sore about the Winter
    Olympics...

Re .43

    Stefan is definitely not one of our Norwegian boys, he's Swedish (need I say more?)

Btw: Did you see the results from the under-21 teams last night:

	England 0 - Norway 2 

--arne
129.47Hindsight in advanceOSLACT::HENRIKWI need no spell chequerWed Oct 14 1992 13:3210
    No further comments about the giraffe who stuck his neck out
    in .41. But in the good tradition of blaming one's defeats
    on a poor performance and the opponent's luck (as opposed to
    talent), my bet for tonight is England 3, Norway 1. The only
    reason being that Norway never played up to par, and England
    had a lucky spell.
    
    The dark horse tonight may be the Mexican referee...
    
    Henrik
129.48STKOFF::SPERSSONPas de problemeWed Oct 14 1992 13:3118
    
>   Stefan, the way the English team played in Sweeden is the real reason behind
>   the gazza hype. Not too many people know him outside of England.
>   You wont find too many non-English people claiming gazza to be the
>   best player in the world. 

    I think the problem might be reverse. People outside England have seen
    more than enough of Gazza. It is the English that have not seen enough
    of other countries' footballers, they just assume that if you 
    stand out in the English League you're automatically World Class.
    
>   Stefan your boys have a chance tonight, not because Norway is a great or
>   good team no, its just because England are a weak team.

    Dave, 
    
    A slight misunderstanding. I'm Swedish, not Norwegian (spit, spit,
    spit)
129.49Sorry...KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameWed Oct 14 1992 13:414
   I should have guessed with a name like Stefan that you were Sweedish...

                                                               -dave-
129.50GAZZA=WORLD CLASSPEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Oct 14 1992 13:5110
    Re.48
    
    Oh thats it is it,we arent able to spot a good player,so is that why
    the Italians are making such a big fuss of him,I mean there arent too
    many good players in the Italian league are there.
    
    Face it lads,love him or hate him,he would walk into all your National
    sides.
    
    Dave...
129.51IRELAND= ZIMMER FRAMEPEKING::BAREFIELDANEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUESWed Oct 14 1992 14:098
    
    re-1
    
       Thats not true, he wouldn't get in Irelands team he's far to
       skillful and he cant launch the ball into orbit.
    
       Andy..B
    
129.52All talk and NO glory!!!!!!KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameWed Oct 14 1992 16:0319
   The laughing stock of Europe..... Andy what's yer record in Euro competition
after ye qualified and got to play good teams, like Ireland, Holland, former
Russia, Demark etc..... Like should we remind you how many goals ye scored!!!!!

   Iam just surprised your not playing tonight the way your talking, you seem
to know a lot about success. Maybe that's why English fans are not well liked
anywhere in the World (except Siberia) your always talking about how your going
to stuff the opposition, and by how many goals. Let's be realistic the only
fans on the planet that can speak in such terms are the German fans, and I 
haven't met too many big-headed ones yet.

    The sonner "Scotty" beams a few of ye back to earth then maybe we will hear
more realistic views in future.

                                                          -dave-

p.s I realistically think Ireland will scrape a draw against Denmark tonight,
    although it will be very difficult without Mcgrath, here's hoping.
129.53HmmISEPUB::CHAMPOLLIONCan-tas-ticWed Oct 14 1992 16:4017
129.54PEKING::BAREFIELDANEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUESWed Oct 14 1992 16:459
    RE-52
    
    How many goals did Ireland score in the European championships
    in Sweden ?
    
    Enough said...
    
    Andy...B
    
129.55Deeply movedISEPUB::CHAMPOLLIONCan-tas-ticWed Oct 14 1992 16:59227
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.0                      England V Norway                      16 replies
UPROAR::WOODWARDD "Dave Woodward"                    17 lines  13-OCT-1992 15:31
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    England team for the game 2nite is :
    
    
       		Woods
    		Dixon
    		Pearce
    		Batty
    		Walker
    		Adams (groan)
    		Platt
    		Gazza (hooray)
    		Shearer
    		Wright
    		Ince
    
    	Lets do  it !!!!
    
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.1                      England V Norway                         1 of 16
NEWOA::BURTON                                         4 lines  13-OCT-1992 15:55
                              -< Are yer shaw... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Is'nt the game 2morrow.
    
    Nige.
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.2                      England V Norway                         2 of 16
LOOKIN::MISTRY                                        5 lines  13-OCT-1992 15:59
                                -< Adams oh no >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,

Yep the game is tomorrow. Question is why is he playing Adams and Ince....

Bipin.
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.3                      England V Norway                         3 of 16
UPROAR::WOODWARDD "Dave Woodward"                     5 lines  13-OCT-1992 16:01
                              -< days like these >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    re :base
    
    	yes sorry, in state of shock re :adams/dixon/ince !
    
    dw.
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.4                      England V Norway                         4 of 16
MIACT::CARTERR "Confused of Birmingham.."             5 lines  13-OCT-1992 16:01
                               -< Sky at night? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Is the game on 'real' TV, or do I need to purchase some architectural
    acne in order to see the Lions roar, via Murdoch/Wonka-vision.
    
    Joe Public.
     
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.5                      England V Norway                         5 of 16
ARRODS::OHAGANB "Dirk, Nasty, Stig, Barry, Leggy"     8 lines  13-OCT-1992 16:11
                         -< Analogies-ville, Arizona >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    re .last
    
    I really can't see the lions roaring with ringmaster Grim Taylor
    cracking the whip. :^)  
    
    barry.
    
    
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.6                      England V Norway                         6 of 16
PEKING::SHALLOMA                                     12 lines  13-OCT-1992 17:00
                   -< Adams isnt related to TAYLOR is he??? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Rep-last few
    
    
    
    Yeah,I agree that I would prefer Adams out of the team and personally
    have Pallister in.But you can't really argue with the inclusion of
    Ince,he is playing the best football of his career and don't think he
    will let down anyone..
    
    
     Regards,
                          Aron...
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.7                      England V Norway                         7 of 16
OSLACT::HENRIKW "I need no spell chequer"             7 lines  13-OCT-1992 17:15
                            -< A view from abroad >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Seems to me - from across the North Sea - that Norway has never
    been *less* underestimated before an international game. 
    Judging from your comments, the Norwegian slogan should
    be "Clone Adams!"...
    
    Henrik
    (Oslo) 
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.8                      England V Norway                         8 of 16
FUTURS::FLETCHER                                      7 lines  13-OCT-1992 17:32
                             -< Get down the pub >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bet this note does not last until the morning.
    
    (something about not creating new topics for individual matches)
    
    PS. Its on SKY at 7
    
    Nigel
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.9                      England V Norway                         9 of 16
UPROAR::WOODWARDD "Dave Woodward"                     8 lines  14-OCT-1992 07:14
                            -< just hangin around >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    re: -1
    
    ITS 07:15 am + we're still here !!!!
    
    
    
    dw.
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.10                     England V Norway                        10 of 16
PEKING::BAREFIELDA "NEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUES"  13 lines  14-OCT-1992 08:40
                                   -< !@#$% >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I have a good feeling about tonight, but then again I had a good
    feeling before the european championships. This has got to be the
    best team that England have fielded under Taylor apart from Adams.
    
    Prediction for tonight..
    
    ENGLAND 2  NORWAY 1
    Platt
    Shearer
    
    ANDY..B
    
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.11                     England V Norway                        11 of 16
NEWOA::BURTON                                         7 lines  14-OCT-1992 09:05
                            -< England 2  Norway 0 >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Go on ENGLAND!!!!
    
    Just do it.
    
    Cheers
    Nige.
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.12                     England V Norway                        12 of 16
ARRODS::OHAGANB "Said you came from Memphis"          3 lines  14-OCT-1992 09:45
                             -< Look, no smileys. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tony Adams to be man of the match tonight. 
    
    barry.
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.13                     England V Norway                        13 of 16
MACNAS::MJGREANEY "Bananna Republic"                   1 line  14-OCT-1992 10:53
                      -< where's "Our Nige's" place???? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.14                     England V Norway                        14 of 16
MADBAS::DREES "Relegation....??"                      8 lines  14-OCT-1992 11:07
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I agree we one of the earlier notes. Why a seperate topic for this
    match ? There is after all a group topic where any comments about this
    match should be placed.
    
    Well Mod ?
    
    Del
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 266.15                     England V Norway                        15 of 16
UPROAR::WOODWARDD "Dave Woodward"                     6 lines  14-OCT-1992 12:08
                            -< I'm still standing >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    re : the *very* existence of this topic.
    
    
    I must pull some weight with the mods :-) :-)
    
    dw.

129.56Grow up Andy.....KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameWed Oct 14 1992 17:0114
    Andy I was beting on you coming back with that "childish" remark which folks
are used to. At least we know that Scotland are the best British team after the
Euro 92, but that wasn't hard. 

   The Irish don't spend half their lives braging about a team that plays
Rubbish, unlike you. When we win great, if we lose (which hasn't been often in
the past 5 years) then tough, but we except defeat, and agree that the 
opposition were better. Jimmy Hill is probably related to you, now there's a
man who knows what he's talking about (::). So Andy the next time yer beaten
don't go saying "Well if the defence had played better we might have won"  You
need mega brain cells to come up with that conclusion.

                                                            -dave-
129.57SAME OLD MICKS..PEKING::BAREFIELDANEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUESWed Oct 14 1992 17:2112
129.58PEKING::NAGLEJWed Oct 14 1992 17:5622
    
    Whether Gazza is in the team or not won't make a spit of
    difference when up against Norway who are on the crest of
    a wave at the moment. They have faith in themselves unlike
    England who need a lift to regain their confidence. Maybe
    Gazza will do this but until that ball starts rolling 
    England won't win much.
    
    BTW, whether you like Gazza or not he proved in Italia '90
    that he is/was one of the worlds greatest players. He stood
    out amongst the handful in the world cup. He won't, however,
    be the worlds number one. He may have been had he not busted 
    his knee but he only has himself to blame for that.
    
    I can see England trying very hard tonight but with Adams in
    defence, Ince in the middle and players like Salako on the 
    bench I can see that any Norwegian attack will over run the
    back four, especially if its through the middle.
    
    Norway 4  England 1
    
    JN.
129.59Another non victory...CLARID::KREYERAndre KREYER - ValbonneThu Oct 15 1992 03:5312

	For whoever predicted/whished a trashing for Norway, eat your
	own words.....
	
	The mighty England drew against Norway 1 - 1 at Wembley.
	Please stop rating either some players or the whole team, they
	are simply no good at the moment as their results demonstrate.
	
	Jamie, go and hide somewhere for the next two weeks...
	
								.Andre.
129.60WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACK.PEKING::COSSEYNThu Oct 15 1992 10:2317
    
    Re-59
    What a load a rubbish you are spouting, if you had seen the game you
    would know this was a very good England performance if wasn't for some
    bad finishing then England would have won this game comfortably, fair
    play to Norway who came and got what they wanted, remember one thing
    England drew there opener qulifier against Sweden in the last World
    Cup qulifiers then went on to become the fourth best team in the world.....
    
    To all you Gazza bashers, watch this game and relise YOU ARE watching
    one of the best players in the world, up until last night he had only
    played two competitive games in 17 months and looked as if he hadn't
    been out at all, he is pure class....
    
    Neil..... 
    
      
129.61CHEFS::HOUSEBThu Oct 15 1992 11:2322
    If it wasn't for this, if it wasn't for that......
    
    Come on Neil England could only scrape a disappointing 1-1 draw against
    a second rate footballing nation on the hallowed turf.  And Norway
    *were* a second rate team, ok they've stuffed San Marino and beat
    Holland but last night's performance showed they are a very limited
    team.
    
    Hold up your hand - England as a team were not good enough to beat
    them, whether you blame it on your strikers or your central defenders
    for being happy just to "hoof" balls forward in hope - the bottom line
    reads the same NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
    
    As for Gazza'a performance it is great to see him back and lasting 90
    minutes, but I thought he was a couple of yards too slow all over the
    park.  Taylor needed Salako or Merson on from the start.
    
    Well England have Turkey next and I suppose you'll all be happy to
    scrape a point against another second rate team.     
    
    		Brian.
                                                    
129.62UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funThu Oct 15 1992 11:234
Holland - Poland   2-2


T_
129.63Good Performance,results will come.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Oct 15 1992 11:2610
    
    No complaints from me,if you dont take chances you dont win
    games.England created more chances in this game than they have in the
    last 5 games put together.Shearer and Wright both missed chances but
    they will come,keep them together.
     Even Adams had a good game,hopefully(injuries permitting) Taylor will
    be able to field the same team next month v Turkey,apart from Lee Dixon
    who will lose his place to Rob Jones if fit.
    
    Dave...
129.64Nearly thereUPROAR::WOODWARDDDave WoodwardThu Oct 15 1992 11:298
    Yes , England actually played some decent football which is a *good*
    sign for the future. Norway were let off the hook and were lucky to get
    a draw.
    	Even Tony (ee-aww) Adams played well - very well actually.
    
    The results will come if we carry on playing like this.
    
    dw.
129.65ingerlandESSB::BREEThu Oct 15 1992 11:3625
    
    re: Gazza
    
    Gazza is a good footballer. He is also rude and stupid, plays for a
    mediocre club side and a mediocre national side.
    
    Therefore he is unlikely to ever be mentioned in the same context as
    Pele, Best, Cruyff, Charlton, Beckenbauer etc.
    
    Re: Last night's result
    
    Saying that if the finishing was better you would have won could be
    said for most teams.
    
    I think England did remarkably well last night to get a point. Norway
    have had a good run and must have fancied themselves.
    
    England will still qualify comfortably because they have the best
    players in the world, their league is the most competitive, their
    players have bottle, they never give up, they've got Jimmy Hill......
    .......
    
    
    Paul
    :)  :)   :)
129.66#$&@Menzo@&$# !!ELIS::GEELENThu Oct 15 1992 11:4614
    Everybody sing :
    
    Say.....oeh....aah....Ed de Goey,
    Say.....oeh....aah....Ed de Goey
    
    
    If Stanley Menzo was not in the goal last night in the game against
    poland,than we would have won the match easily, with at least 2-0.
    
    But now, due to some major errors of 'our' keeper Menzo, we drew 2 - 2.
    
    After 20 minutes 2 goals behind against Poland ?
    .....unbelievable
    
129.67England are backXNOGOV::PATTISONWe All StandThu Oct 15 1992 12:0811
    Good to see England putting in a performance they can be proud of. 
    Norway came to defend and missed chances or not, England could only
    score once so they must have been very happy.
    
    Gazza looks much slimmer than I've ever seen him, he stood out as a
    different class last night.  I'm looking forward to seeing him fully
    fit.  Why he finds it necessary to do stupid things like elbowing the
    Norwegian defende I'll never know.
    
    Adrian
    
129.68SUBURB::ABSOLOMTAhhhh, PigsyThu Oct 15 1992 12:3122
    I won't be critisicing this England performance. I thought the whole
    team played well, and if they play to this standard throughout the
    tournament, they'll qualify.
    
    I wouldn't break up Shearer/Wright. I thought they had the makings of a
    good partnership. Gazza was very good for a guy in his first
    competitive 90 minutes is 17 months. Batty, Platt, Pearce all played
    well.
    
    Norway suprised me by their mediocrity. They weren't very good were
    they?
    
    Platt, Shearer, Wright all should have scored. However, no complaints
    about a cracking equaliser, and hats off to Norway for sneaking a draw.
    
    The chip-on-shoulder brigade are going to criticise whatever. England
    are about as popular as a soiled nappy to some. But hey, who gives a
    sh*t! I love `em anyway.
    
    Tony
    
     
129.69TRUCKS::SANTTorpedoed in Moskow....Thu Oct 15 1992 12:4221
    
    	England didn't "scrape" a draw last night, they dominated the
    	in-form Norwegians for long periods of the game and will be
    	disappointed but not devastated at only getting a point.
    
    	But fair enough, if you don't take your chances whilst you're
    	controlling the game you will often get caught out by the late 
    	equaliser. Ian Wright missed two chances that he'd have buried
    	in an Arsenal shirt, so that's that.
    
    	I was proved right about the distribution from the full-backs;
    	Dixon's crossing and passing in attack was woeful. Adams, though,
    	had a good game - yes, I know ;-)
    
    	Batty and Ince did a lot of work to allow Gascoigne to create
    	with the ball, and I thought this side showed a lot of promise.
             
    	For heavens' sake, there are still 9 games left for England. We'll
    	be there at the end of this group...
    
    	Andy.
129.70So yer all happy with a point now!!!!!!KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameThu Oct 15 1992 12:4918
   I see no one complaining why England didn't win by a clear 3 goal margin
last night!!!!! All of a sudden you seem very happy with a point!!!!! Well Well
and the English team played well!!!! yea they sure did they managed to score a
goal!!!!! and that against a second rate team at home.. no offense to Norway.

  At least I predicted realistically when I mentioned a point against the 
present Euro champions would be a great result and that's what we got, but Iam
not braging about it..

Re .65  Yea Paul your right England will qualify easily, they have the best
        players, the best striking force in the world, and if by chance they
        don't make it, Iam sure some of their supporters will try to convince
        us that they really did!!!!!!!!

p.s JF, congrats on your team winning, Cantona scored an excellent goal.....

                                                        -dave-
129.71Well done Grim.ARRODS::OHAGANBSaid you came from MemphisThu Oct 15 1992 12:529
    Taylor should certainly stick with this team, obviously replacing 
    Dixon with Rob Jones and perhaps making either Ince or Batty expendable
    if need be. Adams played very well (did'nt I tell you) and Wright_M
    should be a bit worried now about his England career. Give this team,
    with the above modifications, a few more run-outs and England could
    well qualify. 
    
    barry.
                                             
129.72Finding victory in a drawOSLACT::HENRIKWI need no spell chequerThu Oct 15 1992 13:099
    Yes, we were very lucky. 1-1 on Wembley is celebrated as a victory
    over here in Norway. And we may well be a second-rate country,
    but it sure is strange how the 'first-rate countries' still fail
    to beat us... 
    
    Still, it'll be nice to enjoy watching England play again,
    without hoping they won't score a second goal. ;^)
                                 
    Henrik
129.73O'Noters off again...YAWN.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Oct 15 1992 13:2710
    
    Re.70
    
    Who are the noters that are happy with a point,no one is.We could and
    should have hammered them but we didnt,what you will find is that most
    of the English noters are pleased with the way the team played.We are
    only concerned with England,so why dont you concentrate on your own
    National side,your Boring.
    
    Dave...
129.74SUBURB::ABSOLOMTAhhhh, PigsyThu Oct 15 1992 13:317
    How nice to hear that. It makes a change from the whining Scots and
    Irish who are more interested in attacking England than talking about
    their own teams.
    
    Tony
    
    
129.75PEKING::NAGLEJThu Oct 15 1992 13:3112
    
    Well I thought Norway deserved the win. Englands goal was a
    lucky deflection from a donkey shot.
    
    Gazza was fat and slow and Adams is about as creative as
    toilet paper.
    
    Yet Grim Failure thought it was a "right result".
    
    An England Veterans team could out play the current side.
    
    JN.
129.76Its points that count!KBOMFG::TMCMANUSThu Oct 15 1992 13:4213
    It's really nice to read about all you folks saying how well England
    played on the night and what an improvement in performance you saw...
    BUT...in a years time when the crunch comes, all that you'll remember
    about last nights game was the home point dropped, it *may* prove
    decisive. 
    
    Qualifying is all about amassing more points than the other teams in
    your group, whether you play well in doing so is besides the point.
    
    I'll betcha that last night's "excellent team performance" will come
    back and bite yer bums!
    
    Tom
129.77England played ok :-( :-(MADBAS::DSMITHONE THOMAS BROLIN...Thu Oct 15 1992 13:4325
    
    
     Having watched the highlights of the game last night, I reckon England
    should be pretty pleased with their performance, if not the result.
    They certainly should have scored more than the 1 goal and have had the
    match well and truly over before the Norwegians scored. One thing that
    impressed me was the sharpness of Shearer and Wright up-front although
    their finishing was pretty poor. Also, where was the midfield when the
    Norwegian guy picked up the ball before scoring. He had loads of time
    and space to get it under control before firing in the shot.
    
     Danny.
    
    ps Some of the noters seem to be getting pretty upset about comments
    from the Scots and Irish fans. You should realise that all/most Scots,
    Irish, Welsh love to wind up England supporters and love to see England
    fall flat on their faces. This is due to the hype and arrogance of the
    tabloid rags, commentators and certain players who think that England
    is the be-all and end-all.
    
    pps As a Scotsman, I admit that Scotland were utter crap last night and
    were very fortunate to get a draw.
    
    ppps I saved my only cheer of the night until Norway equalised :-)
                                                                      
129.78TA = MOTMSIOG::SPENCERPeter Spencer @DBO 827-2286Thu Oct 15 1992 13:481
    
129.79YAWNSEDSWS::WILLMOTTThu Oct 15 1992 14:0514
    
    RE last. You bet or Hope ;^)
    
    Re .75  " Well I thought Norway deserved the win"   
    
    	What ??  I might be reading you all wrong here, are you serious ?
    
    
      In these troubled economic times it's good to see there is still some
    consistency in life. England actually play well (but don't get the
    result) and we STILL get the "Let's slag of the English cos I don't 
    really have anything better to say" brigade spouting b*ll*cks.
    
    	Thanks .65  
129.80Relax Dave......KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameThu Oct 15 1992 14:0813
  Re .73....

    Dave I suggest you read note .77 the ps section.... That basically sums up
some of my entries in this topic. The sooner some of ye realise that England are
a second rate team the better. Why do so some of ye start predicting some 
hilarious result like 4-0 for England?? Dave the only wording missing from 
Dannys note is that some of the noters in here think England are the be-all and
end-all.

                                                           -dave-

p.s Do you also consider the English team boring????
129.81GET HIM OUTSUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupThu Oct 15 1992 14:3025
    This Dave Tanner is really annoying.  I've never heard such rubbish,
    but whatdo you expect from the Scottish.  He's just jealous cos he ain't
    English.
    
    Why do the Scots celebrate when they go out of the European
    Championships.     
    
    Its about time that the Scottish woke up.   
    
    We'll Scotland World Cup campaign is going really well ain't it.
    
    
    SWITZERLAND  3    SCOTLAND  1
    SCOTLAND     0    PORTUGAL  0
    
    
    
    
    Why don't you go into your own note and start making excuses cos
    Scotland are fast becoming a joke.
    
    And Leeds will beat Rangers.
    
    
                       Terry 
129.82PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Oct 15 1992 14:318
    
    RE.80
    
    Do I consider the England team boring ???
    
      No....not when compared to Ireland.
    
    Dave...
129.83SEDSWS::WILLMOTTYok youself Thu Oct 15 1992 14:3112
    
    
    re .77
    
     Fair comment about the tabloid papers and I for one have no objection
    to some of the replies about England, yours for example is a done with
    a smile or :-( to be exact.  It's the more un-tongue in cheek notes
    which run deeper than being pissed off with tabloid newspapers which 
    bore the sh*t out of me. 
    
    
    	Chris
129.84FORTY2::ETHERIDGENo way figure 4Thu Oct 15 1992 14:3812
129.85AYOV11::KMCCLELLANDThe Honest TruthThu Oct 15 1992 14:4610
    re .81
    
    "He's just jealous cos he ain't English"
    
    That has to be the biggest load of manure ever entered in this
    conference.
    
    Wake up mate, no Scot would *EVER* choose to be english instead.
    
    Kev...
129.86The Home International Abuse League 1992ARRODS::OHAGANBSaid you came from MemphisThu Oct 15 1992 14:514
    Refreshments are available from the foyer should an intermission
    occur. :^)
    
    barry.
129.87If Only!! The great English ExcuseESSB::BLONGI Was There on the Stretford EndThu Oct 15 1992 14:526
129.88Stop talking and let the Sun Shine...VAXVLS::CCASEYThu Oct 15 1992 14:5315
129.89Honest guv....TRUCKS::SANTTorpedoed in Moskow....Thu Oct 15 1992 14:5513
             
    	This notes conference should be renamed the XENOPHOBIC conference,
    	because that's what it's degenerated into...8-(
    
    	Some of the English noters' contributions are as bad/worse as 
    	some of the non-English noters' contributions so don't any of 
    	you get all steamed up about my comments being directed
    	specifically at *YOU*.
    
    	The crap is coming from both sides of the fence. Who started it?
    	Who cares....................
    
    	Andy.
129.90Trevor "Brylcreem" BrookingCHEFS::HOUSEBThu Oct 15 1992 14:5711
    re .87
    
    The best one from Brooking was in the first half when a Platt pass was
    blocked by the ref and Norway took possession .  One of their forwards
    then got chopped down on the edge of the box and Brooking thought that
    the ref shouldn't have given the free kick because the ball rebounded
    to the Norwegian off of him and that would have levelled things up.
    
    Laughable, the English commentators really are something else.....
    
    		Brian
129.91HiddenISEPUB::CHAMPOLLIONCan-tas-ticThu Oct 15 1992 15:157
129.92Gazza is backFUTURS::FLETCHERThu Oct 15 1992 15:177
    RE:-1
    
    You should have heard the Scotch one on SKY.
    
    England were playing Sweden as well according to him.
    
    Nigel
129.93A Scotch what...?MADBAS::DSMITHONE THOMAS BROLIN...Thu Oct 15 1992 15:359
    
    
    re - 1
    
    Is that a Scotch whisky, a scotch egg or what?
    
    I think we should be told..
    
      Danny.
129.94the need to scoreBUNTY::MISTRYThu Oct 15 1992 15:569
Hi,

Lets all be honest, England played well and deserved to win. However, as all
good football managers are prone to saying, "We would have won if we'd scored
more goals".

Bipin.


129.95!@$%^&PEKING::BAREFIELDANEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUESThu Oct 15 1992 16:076
    
    RE-90
    
     At least Brooking knows the players names, not like that traiter
     Charlton..
    
129.96unluckyDBOT07::RUSSELLThu Oct 15 1992 16:2212
    As an Irishman, I would like to say that I thought England played
    very well, they looked skillful, and just needed some more decisiveness
    in attack to polish off a very neat performance.
    
    The Norway goal was a beauty, but ENgland should have had the game
    signed, sealed and delivered at that stage.
    
    You will play worse and win.
    
    Cheers,
    
    *Tiger*
129.97Charlton the No. 1......VAXVLS::CCASEYThu Oct 15 1992 16:3512
    re .95
    
    sounds like a bit of jealousy that england wasted the chance of having
    Charlton as manager....
    cause
      
                 J. Charlton  V.   G.(PRO Man) Taylor
    result at least    10     -       0
    
    if scores could go into minus then Taylor would have one....
    
    Colin.... 
129.98Changing the subject . . .FORTY2::ASHGrahame Ash @REOThu Oct 15 1992 16:416
So what's up with Holland then? They (and England of course) were going to 
walk away with this group. England continue to get results (well, sometimes!) 
with a bunch of definitely not world-class footballers but Holland, with REAL 
world-class performers just don't manage it - what's up Ton?

grahame
129.99Good but Not Good EnoughWOTVAX::MACDONALDIStalybridge CelticThu Oct 15 1992 17:1827
    
    England did everything right last night, their only problem was putting
    it in the back of the net. Wright and Shearer are very quick, Shearer
    the unluckier of the two, great header of the ball.
    The midfield looked solid enough and played well with gazza just in
    front. They definately needed some form of winger, that was a
    department in which we were lacking. Where was Andy Sinton ???
    The back four I think is the main concern, alright Adams played well
    enough but did you count the amount of times he hoofed it up the park,
    looked like he played for the wombles.... Woods was never really tested
    until the goal arrived, to which he may have been at fault. Using the
    wrong arm to go for the ball!!???
    
    Anyway from what I heard Scotland played bobbins and were lucky to hold
    on to the draw. Only 22,000 turned up at Ibrox, due to prices ranging
    from 12-20 pounds a go, not surprising for no goals.....
    
    mac (an exiled Scot in Angleterre)
    
    p.s. talking a few back about commentators knowing the players, after
    the highlights on Sportsnight, Jimmy (the chin, i'm the god of english
    football) Hill was asked to comment on some of the moves that England
    nearly scored on. One move involved three players, in which resulted in
    Platt chesting it down, turning and shooting, and the player that
    passed the ball on the volley was number 11 (paul ince) not ian wright,
    and this had be replayed about 2/3 times during the highlights... What
    can you say.  
129.100CHARLTON IS A DESPICABLE PERSONPEKING::BAREFIELDANEVER FELT MORE LIKE SINGING THE BLUESThu Oct 15 1992 17:2511
    re-97
    
    Jealous! do be sensible.. I would rather keep Taylor, at least
    he knows the names of his players. I suprised Jack Charlton isn't
    a player manager, he's about the right age.
    
    Lets face it, we all know its a long way off, but in all noters
    hearts of hearts, we all know England will be at the Finals.
    
    Andy...B
    
129.101Menzo weg ermeeUTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funThu Oct 15 1992 17:5336
              <<< Note 129.98 by FORTY2::ASH "Grahame Ash @REO" >>>
                        -< Changing the subject . . . >-

>>So what's up with Holland then? They (and England of course) were going to 
>>walk away with this group. England continue to get results (well, sometimes!) 
>>with a bunch of definitely not world-class footballers but Holland, with REAL 
>>world-class performers just don't manage it - what's up Ton?

>>grahame

Grahame,

I though nobody would ask :-)))

The Dutch side under new manager Dick Advocaat are going up and down.

They played crap against Norway and Norway derserved the 2-1 win, yesterday
against Poland was a different thing. Hans van Breukelen dicided to stop
playing for the national team and Advocaat choose Stanley Menzo and the
new goal-keeper, ofcourse Stanley plays for Ajax (Advocaat fancies Ajax :-(((.
The problem with Stanley is that he can't stand the pressure, always in
important games he makes mistakes (the ones yoy see DAve Beasant make).
Yesterday was the same, he made a terrible mistake wich let in the first
Polish goal and he also looked dodgy when the put in the second one just
minutes later. After that there was only one team on the pitch ie Holland.

In Injury time Peter van Vossen made 1-2 and with only 1 minute gone in the
second half van Vossen put 2-2 on the score-board. In the second half Poland
had one change trough Wlodie Smolarek (FC UTRECHT :_)))))) and Holland had
a least 15, both van Basten and Bergkamp were not on target and put the ball
wide of the goal or against the goal-keeper.

I think it will be a heck of a battle to qualify for the USA in 1994 'cause
all teams are strong except San Marino.

T_
129.102Names of players but thats all...VAXVLS::CCASEYThu Oct 15 1992 17:574
    Re. -2  you say that Taylor knows the names of his players well i'm
    afraid thats all he knows...
    
    Colin...
129.103ARRODS::OHAGANBSaid you came from MemphisThu Oct 15 1992 17:5921
    I find it hard to believe that there are England fans out there
    who really do expect us to crush the likes of Norway or walk away
    with a qualifying group. Even before Norway's World Cup campaign
    they showed their ability by beating the Italians in the Euro '92
    qualifiers. 
    
    The only team we are expected to crush in the group is San Marino. 
    Turkey? I remember a very uninspiring England team upstaged by a
    Turkish side in possession of superior passing skills during the
    Euro '92 qualifiers. And most people in here should be aware of how
    difficult the Poles can be so expect the customary tough match in
    Poland where we scrape through, just. 
    
    Only when style, promised last night, is matched by consistency
    can we really begin to compare ourselves with the likes of the
    Germans. Until then, forget it.
    
    barry.   
    
     
     
129.104Not only Stanley !!!!UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Thu Oct 15 1992 18:1212
    re -????Ton
    
    You say it right, Ton. Holland had dozens of chances, but the ball just
    didn't want to roll in. And the two goals from Poland cannot be put on
    Menzo's account, only. The defense in total was a shame.....
    I remember when van Breukelen had his first games and made some
    remarkable faults.......and then everyone was crying for another.
    Menzo showed with Ajax that he can't stand the nerves !
    And ofcourse Advocaat favours Ajax, seeing last years result. The only
    problem is that you can't play Ajax' system with a lot of footballers
    from other clubs.
    But it will be very very hard for the Dutch to reach the USA now.....
129.105Excellent note Barry....KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameThu Oct 15 1992 18:1210
re .103...

      I couldn't agree with you more. I seen that game live v Turkey at Wembley
and the Turks were basically in total control. The only thing they didn't do
was score. They will give a few teams headaches...

   Anyway Iam glad there's an English fan out there who knows what he's talking
about.

                                                                  -dave-
129.106PEKING::NAGLEJThu Oct 15 1992 18:234
    
    Brown nose.
    
    JN.
129.107PEKING::JOLLYLViva la rock .... the killer lives onThu Oct 15 1992 21:1612
    
    Ton,
    
    how dare you enter a note in here I thought this was the England/slag
    Enlgand note, stuff off Holland, get out now.
    
    By the way did you know that Andy did the dirty and got married in
    Florida a couple of weeks ago, see you in 31,
    
    Loz.
    
    ps :-)
129.108WELL DONEMACNAS::SMORANThu Oct 15 1992 23:448
    Just like to add my tuppence. IMO England played very well last night,
    they created chances and were also confident on the ball. Nine out of
    ten times they would probably have won 3 nil. But they will play a lot
    worse and still win some matches. As regards Taylor V Charlton - 
    Charlton has forgotton more about football than Taylor ever Knew.
    Enough said.
    
    Stephen
129.109UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funFri Oct 16 1992 13:1324
 <<< Note 129.107 by PEKING::JOLLYL "Viva la rock .... the killer lives on" >>>

    
>>    Ton,
    
>>    how dare you enter a note in here I thought this was the England/slag
>>    Enlgand note, stuff off Holland, get out now.
  
As the Dutch reincarnation of Vinnie I really feel at home here.
  
>>    By the way did you know that Andy did the dirty and got married in
>>    Florida a couple of weeks ago, see you in 31,
  
Whot a bugger, I spoke to him just before he left and he never mentioned it, 
I'll give him a bell today see how he's doing. I feel sorry for Emma ;_)))))

  
>>    Loz.
  
      T_  

>>    ps :-)

      pps :-) :-) :-)
129.110Taylor's DummyESSB::BLONGI Was There on the Stretford EndFri Oct 16 1992 16:045
129.111no brainBUNTY::MISTRYFri Oct 16 1992 16:527

Taylor doesn't seem to have many grey cells left. 

Bipin.

PS he's waiting for the return of John Barnes....
129.112resultXSTACY::KMCGRATHLong road, patient donkeyThu Oct 29 1992 14:575
Turkey 4 San Marino 1

Turks got 3 in the last 4 minutes

 
129.113Turks roast oppositionDBOT07::RUSSELLThu Nov 12 1992 17:349
    and apparently the Turkish fans again disgraced themselves...
    like they did against us last year.
    
    UEFA should wise up to these people ...make the Turks play their homes
    someplace else....lets see ...YES ..make them play in Greece.
    
    Now that'd be really turning the screw.. he he!
    
    *Tiger*
129.114Palmer is a great defender *not*..VAXVLS::CCASEYLiverpool now and forever..Tue Nov 17 1992 12:2913
    I see that the mighty Carlton Palmer is in the English team again with
    all the good defenders in engerland and Taylor has to pick some one who
    admitted to the press "that he makes no excuses for his lack of skill"
    and then went on to say he "has a great work rate but that there is no
    one to benefit from it" what a load of c@#p.  Palmer is going to give
    great enjoyment for non-engerlanders who will watch his gallant attempt
    to "act" as a defender.  With a bit of luck Taylor will keep playing
    him so that buy the end of these qualifiers England will be
    deservedly(sp) out of the World Cup, Taylor will resign and England
    will become the minnows of world soccer.
    
    Colin..
    ^^^^^^^
129.115The Great GlennFORTY2::FOWLERMTue Nov 17 1992 15:249
Personally I think failing to qualify for the world cup would be a mixed blessing
for the English:

BAD because we don't get to take part (obviously).

GOOD because Graham Taylor would get sacked and be replaced by the mighty Glenn
Hoddle.

Mike
129.116England to STUFF Turkey....PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKTue Nov 17 1992 16:1517
    
    Well England are back on the World Cup trail tomorrow with a game
    against Turkey nothing but a win will do I expect England to win
    easily with Shearer and Wright both producing the goods...
    
    If the papers are anything to go by there will only be one change
    Palmer coming in for the injured Batty.....
    
    So I'm going to stick my neck out and go for a score of a least 
    4-0,
    Shrearer 2
    Wright   1
    Gazza    1
     
    Neil.......  
    
    
129.117England teamFORTY2::ASHGrahame Ash @REOTue Nov 17 1992 16:1514
	Woods
	Dixon
	Pearce
	Palmer
	Walker
	Adams
	Platt
	Gascoigne
	Shearer
	Wright
	Ince

Subs to be named tomorrow.
129.118Is the game been played in Istanbul???????KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameTue Nov 17 1992 18:329
   If the game is in Istanbul then a draw wouldn't be a bad result, and a
win for the Turks would be no way a surprise, their supporters are fanatical
and sometimes dangerous... Is the game on SKY???? and if so what time????

   Remember the Turkish side in Wembley back in 91???? They played England of
the park but suffered from stage fright in front of goals.

                                                         -dave-
129.119PAKORA::JJACKWed Nov 18 1992 01:336
    
    Prediction time !!!!!!
               
    
    1-1...and Taylor's job is once more on the line !!
    
129.120Spain, get ready for a neck ache..PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEWed Nov 18 1992 10:4416
    
    England will win 3-0
    
    Shearer
    Platt
    Gazza..  
         
    Englands bubble is going to burst tonight and show the world
    that we mean business once again. I'm confident that England
    will be the only British side to win tonight, Scotland will
    be lucky to get anything out of their game against Italy, and
    Ireland, need we say any more about those clowns..
    
    Andy..B
    
             
129.121CHEFS::HOUSEBWed Nov 18 1992 11:205
    With all due respect Andy, Ireland are not a British team they are an
    Irish team, in the same way Barry McGuigan was Irish until he won
    something and Lennox Lewis was Canadian until he won something.
    
    		Brian.
129.122Turkey Unstuffed..VAXVLS::CCASEYLiverpool now and forever..Wed Nov 18 1992 11:336
    Well if the result of the U21 's is anything to go by 
    
    England 0 - 1 Turkey   well done  turkey is all i can say..
    
    Colin..
    ^^^^^^^
129.123TRUCKS::SANTBut sir, it's *supposed* to do that!Wed Nov 18 1992 12:224
    
    	> well done  turkey is all i can say..
    
    	If only....
129.124A pint of GuinesssAYOV27::SALLENWed Nov 18 1992 13:277
    REL.121
    
     Like Bernie Slaven, Ray Houghton, Tommy Coyne are Irish - until they
    cannot win something 8-)
    
    
    ... Stevie
129.125Just to even it upSIOG::BRADLEYWed Nov 18 1992 13:354
    re -1 
    
    What about John Barnes and Butcher. They were not born in the UK.
    
129.126ENGAGE BRAIN BEFORE PENDBOT07::RUSSELLWed Nov 18 1992 13:3718
    This 'Irish people suddenly becoming British when they achieve
    something' thing really sunk home the other night when I was watching
    Coronation Street on the box. Martin Platt ( the prat) called
    Oscar Wilde an Englishman. Ye Gods.
    
    BTW, if "JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE" and the Irish are "clowns",
    then I don't know what to say about the person who disgraced this
    conference last summer when he made comments about Terry Yorath and
    his son, who died at the age of 12.
    
    You'd *NEVER* find an Irish supporter that would lower himself to
    those obvious rascist SHED depths. One of the main reasons why I left
    the Chelsea note was because I did'nt like the company of certain
    other noters.
    
    Nuff Said.
    
    *Tiger* 
129.127Good LuckDBOT07::RUSSELLWed Nov 18 1992 13:428
    I'd also like to wish England good luck against Turkey tonight. Based
    on the u-21 score , they're gonna need it. Maybe the Turks won't
    bottle in front of goal like they did in 1991.
    
    Sincerely, I hope England qualify for 94...I want Ireland to face them
    in the USA. 
    
    *Tiger*
129.128PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEWed Nov 18 1992 13:457
    
    I'm sure Terry Yoraths son was more than 12 when he died, may be
    you have yours and his age mixed up..
    
    Andy..B
    
    
129.129PEKING::NAGLEJWed Nov 18 1992 14:0019
    
    
    Andy. Does it really make a difference how old Terry Yoraths son
    was ? 
    
    On the Irish/English thing. Going by the few notes I've read so far
    it looks like turning ugly unlike the Rangers/Leeds banter we had
    a short while back.
    
    Before it does go any further perhaps its a good idea that its knocked
    on the head now before it does get stupid.
    
    As far as Ireland and England are concerned I get the best of both
    worlds. I cheer them both on. I was born in this country but my whole
    family before me (1932 and before) are Irish. I'm not sure though which 
    team I feel closer too. I am glad that both teams are in different
    groups for this World Cup.
    
    JN.
129.130To feel is to breathe..to breathe is to live.DBOT07::RUSSELLWed Nov 18 1992 14:1015
    
    >>I'm sure Terry Yoraths son was more than 12 when he died, may be
    >>you have yours and his age mixed up..
    
    I'm not certain Andy, all I know is he was a son to his mother and father
    and I'm sure his loss wounded them deeply.
    
    Can you understand those feelings of sympathy? More importantly, do 
    you have any conception of the pain they went/are going through? 
    
    	Perhaps the number 12 entered my head when I thought about the 
    	I.Q. rating of the Shed. No, not the average I.Q., the *SUM* of
    	all I.Q.s on the Shed. 
    
    *Tiger*
129.131SUBURB::WAITEGWE HATE WEST HAMWed Nov 18 1992 14:309
    Tiger
    
    I understand what you are saying about most of fans in the Shed being 
    thick.  (You have to be to support Chelsea), but you can't crictise all 
    Chelsea fans because of about 100 or so twats.  Most Chelsea fans, like 
    Millwall fans go to watch the match and not to sing songs which are sick, 
    about certain events. 
    
    Gary
129.132But but but its ah true..VAXVLS::CCASEYLiverpool now and forever..Wed Nov 18 1992 14:4518
    I hope England do well tonight
    
     *************** NOT ***********

    its about time England got a good kick in the A$#@ and not qualifying
    for the World Cup could do the trick.  The major thing wrong with the
    English Team is that slimy creep Taylor if only he could admit when
    England play crap,  if only he could resign and let a decent manager in
    but no that would be to smart instead he'll keep picking crap teams
    i.e. by chopping and changing all the time just because the team does
    not play well on its first outing together.  I really believe that I
    wouldn't hate England as much if Taylor wasn't around..
    But even with a new manager I still
    
    would not want them to win..     come on the Turks..

    Colin..
    ^^^^^^^
129.133TRUCKS::SANTBut sir, it's *supposed* to do that!Wed Nov 18 1992 14:506
    
    	....... ,,,,,,,, just add where appropriate.
    
    	Thank you for your comments, I'm very grateful.
    
    	Andy.
129.1342nd rateMADBAS::DREESRelegation....??Wed Nov 18 1992 15:029
    
    
    When will all English fans realise that the problem is not that you have 
    a dumplin' as a manager. The real problem lies in the fact that, like 
    Scotland, you have no international class players. 
    
    Wake up boys......if you don't have the players what can you do ?
    
    Del.
129.135PLUNDR::MORANWell Des, it was a bit of a bobbler....Wed Nov 18 1992 15:109
    
>   you have no international class players.
    
    Gazza, Pearce, Walker and Platt? But anyway 4 good players doesn't make
    a good team and I admit that we're crap at the moment
    
    and everybody hates us!! ;-(
    
    Tim
129.136Yes Sir..VAXVLS::CCASEYLiverpool now and forever..Wed Nov 18 1992 16:096
     re. .133
    
    Well at least I'm getting there next time i'll try to do better Sir..
    
    Colin..
    ^^^^^^^
129.137What time's K.O?NEWOA::BURTONWed Nov 18 1992 16:394
    
    What time's the K.O for tonight's England V Turkey game?? 
    
    Nige.
129.138FORTY2::ASHGrahame Ash @REOWed Nov 18 1992 16:463
8.00 at Wembley tonight, live on Sky (spit!) and highlights on BBC1 later.

g
129.139Cheers...NEWOA::BURTONWed Nov 18 1992 17:486
    
    RE:-1
    
    Cheers Grahame.
    
    Nige.
129.140Platt and Wright.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Nov 18 1992 18:187
    
    England to win 2-0 tonight,and so P*ssing off all the anti English
    Mc and O'Noters out there.
    
    Were on our way to the States...
    
    Dave...
129.141One non-english supporter who won't be p*ssed off if they winSIOG::BRADLEYWed Nov 18 1992 19:0714
    
      Dave,
    
      That's a bad attitude to have. It's not that we dislike the England
      team, it's the way you rate them that they are in the Top 10 teams in
      the world. At the moment they are not.
    
      They have alot of good skillful individual players who play well at
      club football but as a team they are unbalanced. Wheather this is 
      down to the manager we'll only know when you get rid of him.
    
      Gary....
    
    
129.142Is Andy B related to David Duke?SIOG::BUCKLEYManchester - Championship Free ZoneWed Nov 18 1992 19:226
    
    Like most of my fellow Celts, I'll be shouting for the Turks tonight
    for two reasons 
    	1. Graham Failure, whose team plays crap football despite Gazza,
    	   Shearer, Wright, Walker & Woods
    	2. Racists like "Andy..B"
129.143PLUNDR::MORANWell Des, it was a bit of a bobbler....Wed Nov 18 1992 19:588
    
  re 29.142
    
    ..... you forgot: 
    
    3. The 500 years of oppression, discrimination, etc, etc ;-)
    
    Tim  (Not even English according to Billy Bingham)
129.144Top ten? No worriesFORTY2::FOWLERMWed Nov 18 1992 19:5924
I think England do have the potential to be in the top 10 national sides in the
world, but we are hindered by our domestic schedule. (yawn...tired old subject)

If we cut down the number of games we play in domestic competitions, which could
be achieved by abandoning some of the poor cup competitions, and appointed Sir
Glenn Hoddle as manager we'd be up there with the best.

We certainly have the players:

Gascoigne, Lineker (I'm sure he'd play again for Glenn), Waddle (likewise),
Barnes, Salako, Platt, Walker, Pearce, Wright, Shearer, et. al.

Not to mention such potential superstars as Kevin Richardson, Dalian Atkinson,
Shaun Teale, Tony Daley, and Nigel Clough.

Unfortunately at the moment we don't play as well as we perhaps should. At the
moment I think the Republic are a superior side, and all credit to Big Jack 
for that. They deserved to beat us both times in the European qualifiers, and 
I'm sure they would have done a better job once they'd got there.

That said, I predict England will win 1-0 tonight, and David Platt will be the
scorer. Isn't he always?

Mike
129.145Lame ExcuseESSB::BLONGEurope is Scouse FreeWed Nov 18 1992 20:128
129.146WOTVAX::SHAW27::WATTERSONPEverton Everton rah rah rahThu Nov 19 1992 00:5011
    Final score..... Att 42,000 ish
    
    
    England   4-0   Turkey
    Gascoigne
    Shearer
    Pearce
    Gascoigne
    
    
    Paul
129.147WOTVAX::SHAW27::WATTERSONPEverton Everton rah rah rahThu Nov 19 1992 00:5510
    
    Latest score from Spain
    
    Spain 0-0 Ireland
    
    Spain have just had a player sent off
    
    60 mins gone
    
    Paul
129.148AT LEAST SOMEONE CAN WIN..PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEThu Nov 19 1992 09:3518
    
    Paul Gascoigne put England back on the tracks for the world cup
    last night scoring two brilliant goals. England seemed to be looking
    at another bad night when Turkey hit the bar, but Gazza took
    the gobble out of Turkey when he scored his first after 16 minutes
    and then set up Wright who crossed to Shearer for the second
    with a diving header. Stuart Pearce scored the third from a
    free-kick in the second half and then Des walker with a great
    run, set up Gazza who rounded the keeper and then finished
    the Turks off...    
    
          ENGLAND AND GAZZA ARE BACK....
    
    
    Andy..B
    
    
    
129.149That'll do Nicely...PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Nov 19 1992 11:3210
    
    The best England performance under Graham Taylor.A good game with all
    the England side playing well,obviously Gascoigne  but Ince,
    Dixon and Wright stood out for me.Wright had an excellent game and a
    goal will surely come against San Marino.
     A good win that will help the goals for column,with another two points
    v San Marino in Febuary,that will set up up nicely for the more testing
    games v Holland,Poland and Norway.
    
    Dave...
129.150Gascoigne=PURE GENIUS..PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKThu Nov 19 1992 13:499
    
    Nothing much to add a great performance from a side thats starting
    to ooze confidence and quality...Quality performance....
    
    If Gascoigne carries on playing like this the tag of "Greatest
    Footballer in the World"  will be his........
    
    Neil..
    
129.151Turkey already stuffed for XmasBIBROK::ROBERTSONAin't it marvelousThu Nov 19 1992 14:1125
Who was the Turkish No. 7

His free kick at the beginning of the second half should go down as was
of the greatest not to have gone in.

For those who didn't see it, he struck the ball as sweetly as any
Multi-Million rated player from at least 40 Yards, forcing Woods into a great 
save.

That would have been a hell of a way for Turkey to score their first goal
against England ( Agg. Score now 27-0 )

A very good performance last night. It would appear that Graham Failure has
finally found the core for a good team. I still think the team needs a couple
more quality players to be serious contenders. Even though every player put in
a good showing, I think Palmer & Adams could come unstuck against better 
quality opposition.

Gazza has definitely returned to the international scene in style. Every time
he got the ball he looked dangerous.

As mentioned on Sportsnight, I agree that Shearer's goal was one of the best
goals scored by England in a long time.

Al
129.152?????SUBURB::ABSOLOMTHey Home, to Bel AirThu Nov 19 1992 15:396
    
    Erm, Mr Casey, come in Mr Casey......
    
    Tony
    
    
129.153Well Done.............*NOT* *NOT* ha ha VAXVLS::CCASEYLiverpool now and forever..Thu Nov 19 1992 17:0633
    Comments:

    Yes hello I'm here with Match comments.

    I did say that Palmer was C@#p and even he admitted before the match in
    as many words.  He's just a long string of misery who gets in the way
    all the time.  To the naked eye last nigh the proved me right he's
    useless surely there is a better defender than him in England.  As for
    Adams the donkey what can I say he should be put back out in the field
    to graze.  Poor lad has not been the same since he was locked away.  

    How can I put this Gazza is *NOT* the best player in the world and has
    a long way to go yet before he can fit into the shoe's of the previous
    world bests.  I'll be the first to admit he's a great player but he has
    a lot of maturing to do yet.  

    I can't retract my comments on Mr. Taylor he's still a creep and always
    will be and the sooner he quits the better.

    Another point just as well Turkey didn't score just one of there Golden
    opportunities else the game would have taken a whole different twist.

    
    I must say though Well Done yee have beaten
    
       the World No.1 team Turkey so give yourselves a good pat on the back
    and enjoy life because it could be a whole different ball game when yee
    meet the Mighty Dutch and Polish..
    
    Cheers chaps..
    
    Colin..
    ^^^^^^^
129.154WOTVAX::SHAW27::WATTERSONPEverton Everton rah rah rahThu Nov 19 1992 17:136
    
    Re .153
    
    You're not English then ?
    
    Paul
129.155ah, but what if Gazzcoin gets injured..?DBOT07::RUSSELLThu Nov 19 1992 18:3814
    C'mon Casey....outta here back to 130 now!!!
    
    Let them enjoy their moment of pleasure....It'll give them something to
    look back on when we're in the USA and they're in front of the telly,
    watching the rest of the World and the IRISH enjoying W.C. 94
    
    I'm just waiting to see what happens when one of those Italian 
    Stallion defenders decides to crease Mr Gascoigne's bum over the
    stand. 
    
    I wonder how well will England play then....?
    
    
    *Tiger*
129.156We'll need some rope to pull him outSIOG::BRADLEYThu Nov 19 1992 18:427
    
  >>  I'm just waiting to see what happens when one of those Italian 
  >>  Stallion defenders decides to crease Mr Gascoigne's bum over the
  >>  stand. 
    
      I hope not because that fine Italian Stallion will get lost in
      all that blubber.
129.157It's started already.MADBAS::DSMITHONE THOMAS BROLIN...Thu Nov 19 1992 18:4614
    
    Come now chaps, aren't you all getting a little carried away(as usual)
    A scraped 1-1 draw against a 2nd rate team, and a home win against a
    team whose defence was full of holes. Once you play well against
    quality sides then you can start bragging. As for the big bubble-head,
    he was given 2 goals on a plate. He's hardly set the game on fire in
    Italy, wonder why that is? OH, he's up against quality players every
    week. What a waste of money and headlines!!!!
    
     Danny.
    
    
    ps Just to prove I'm not totally against Engerland, I thought Shearer's
    goal last night was a bit special.
129.158ho hoFORTY2::ETHERIDGELampshadeThu Nov 19 1992 19:265
    What satisfying reading this note is. A nice place for the 'other' people 
    of these islands to have a whinge. Well balanced fellas, to a man; chips 
    on *both* shoulders.
    
    Ian.                                                   
129.159PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEFri Nov 20 1992 11:008
    
    
    Lets face it, most of thses replies only mean one thing..
    
    
            You wish that you were English, well your not, so get in 
            your kilts  or get your Leprechaun uniform on..
    
129.160SIOG::BRADLEYFri Nov 20 1992 12:0212
    
    
>    Lets face it, most of thses replies only mean one thing..
>    
>    
>            You wish that you were English, well your not, so get in 
>            your kilts  or get your Leprechaun uniform on..
    
    
    
     I don't know how you make that one out ??
       
129.161Moderate your ardourISEPUB::CHAMPOLLIONCan-tas-ticFri Nov 20 1992 12:576
Can you please put an end to this boring Scottish-English banter? The world
is not interested.

Thanks

JF Mod.
129.162PEKING::NAGLEJFri Nov 20 1992 13:3332
    
    
    The English team have every reason to feel pleased about the way
    they played Wednesday Evening.
    
    So what if Turkey are a third rate team ? They are much better then
    they used to be and can play football.
    
    The difference between England now and the Euro Champs, apart from
    the inclusion of Gazza, is simply that the team couldn't win against
    third rate teams but the story is different now. So any third rate
    team (and if this is to include Turkey) should be put in their place
    by an England team who hopefully is starting to get it together.
    
    Therefore the team can be pleased for itself and the fans can join in
    as well as it looks like teams that England should win against will be
    defeated.
    
    For the game itself I thought England were lucky in the first 15
    minutes and a goal from Turkey here could have altered the game
    dramatically.
    
    I couldn't believe Wright was so unlucky. He played well and played
    a great part in the attacking performance with more or less all of his 
    attempts on goal being on target.
    
    Palmer and Adams shouldn't be in there, especially Palmer. That is one
    change Taylor will have to make IMO.
    
    JN.
    
    
129.163Gazza Mania hits ENGLAND, AGAIN!!!PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKFri Nov 20 1992 13:4948
    
     re:1 
     Good, lets get some sanity back to this note.......
    
     The Gazza bandwagon roles on with all the papers down here having
     at least two pages on the Genius, love him or hate him he really
     has put the smile back into English football.....
    
     Here are some facts and figures on Gazza's remarkable game against
     Turkey
    
     PASSES ON TARGET..................41
     PASSES OFF TARGET.................7
     FOULS COMMITTED...................0
     FOULS ON HIM......................1
     SUCCESSFUL TACKLES................1
     UNSUCCESSFUL TACKLES..............0
     TACKLED IN POSSESSION.............1
     LOST CONTROL OF BALL..............4
     CORNERS TAKEN.....................10
     FREE-KICKS TAKEN..................2
     HEADERS...........................4
     CROSSES...........................1
     SHOTS OFF TARGET..................0
     SHOTS ON TARGET...................2
     GOALS.............................2
    
     Here are some quotes from his team mates who help Gazza to these
     impressive statistics.
    
     Paul Ince :    'WE FEEL WE'LL BEAT ANYONE WITH HIM'
    
     Lee Dixon:     'JUST TO LOOK AT GAZZA IN THE WARM-UP GIVES YOU A LIFT'
    
     Alan Shearer:  "People say he's replaceable but he's not. He's a
                    natural, a one off"
    
     THE MANAGER:
     Graham Taylor: 'I'LL BUILD MY TEAM ROUND HIM'
    
     all printed without premission from the GAZZA RAG..
    
     If I've got a bit more time I'll enter more quotes from Gazza's
     England team mates....
    
     Rgds
     Neil...
    
129.164I'm famous I amSUBURB::ABSOLOMTHey Home, to Bel AirFri Nov 20 1992 15:376
    
    Off the beat and track, I got a fax printed in the Sun today.
    
    Tony
    
    
129.165CHEFS::HOUSEBFri Nov 20 1992 15:376
    Neil,
    
    A touch of cunnovitus perhaps or maybe a manky old fishing rod with a
    huge amount of quality bait on the end of it.
    
    		Brian
129.166SUBURB::WAITEGWE HATE WEST HAMFri Nov 20 1992 16:396
    Re 164
    
    Tony what are you doing reading the Sun, when all these years you
    claimed to be a Socialist.
    
    Gary
129.167ZZZZzzzzzz ;^)UNTADH::WILCOCKSONBrrrrrrrFri Nov 20 1992 18:487
    >>
    >>     If I've got a bit more time I'll enter more quotes from Gazza's
    >>     England team mates....
    >>   
    
    
    	I can't wait!
129.168England haven't won the WC yetSALES::THILLMon Nov 23 1992 19:4311
    I find a lot of the England wind-ups both annoying and amusing. England
    and their fans ought to be pleased with a 4-0 win, especially since
    these are the games that they would squeak out with an 85th minute goal
    for a 1-0 win in the past. 
    
    As for this "England are the greatest team on earth and have already
    WON the World Cup" nonsense, keep in mind the Norway game, and that the
    qualifaication rounds have barely started. 2 games each against Holland
    and Poland will tell the story.
    
    Tom
129.169PEKING::NAGLEJMon Nov 23 1992 19:4611
    
    
    Thanks Tom. Its about time these England supporters were put
    in their place.
    
    England, greatest team on earth ?? Pah, what nonsense.
    
    I love Scotland. Scotland for the world cup. Or Ireland, whoevers
    winning.
    
    JN.
129.170Case not provenGALVIA::SPAINThere's always the U.S.Mon Nov 23 1992 21:0123
    
    I find the reaction to the Turkey game incredible.  Yes, it was a great
    win.  Yes Gazza is a very talented player but many of his team-mates
    are mediocre.
    
    Turkey are not world beaters.  They scored once in the European
    championship qualifers and lost every game.  They were drawing 1-1 with
    San Marino with 3 minutesleft in Ankara.  England will also thump San
    Marino but Holland will be the real test.
    
    As for Gazza, well football needs heroes.  Gazza has bags of talent and
    he excites.  People come just to watch him.  Because of this we can
    forgive him a lot of the idiotic stuff.  He may well carry England
    through to the World Cup finals.  Ireland don't have a Gazza.  We don't
    have a player that can produce that kind of magic.  Our best player is
    a centre-half.  We do however have a team and we can survive the loss
    of some of our star players.  Ireland have already gone and drawn with
    Denmark in Copenhagen and with Spain in Seville.  Indeed we should have
    won in Seville.  Effectively England are a point down having drawn with
    Norway at Wembley.  Holland are also struggling.  There's a long way to
    go yet.
    
    Gary.
129.171Youths Int. :ROI 3 - 3 NIVAXVLS::CCASEYLiverpool now and forever..Wed Nov 25 1992 11:321
    
129.172The Big Boy Cries AgainESSB::BLONGEurope is Scouse FreeMon Nov 30 1992 21:298
129.173Poland could stop us againFORTY2::ASHGrahame Ash @REOTue Dec 01 1992 13:317
Friendly result:

	Uruguay 0 Poland 1

Still a hell of a lot to do for England . . .

g
129.174PEKING::NAGLEJTue Dec 01 1992 16:0629
    
    
    Re ESSB::BLONG
    
    You have to appreciate what this local derby means to the Roma
    and Lazio supporters especially since there is only a couple of
    points seperating the two teams.
    
    The Italians are fanatical about their football, as you well know.
    The sheer number of fans attending serie A games is quite fantastic
    and they treat their star players like Gods.
    
    So, if Gazza equalises in the 86th minute of a local derby when
    feelings are running high along with the tension AND its also his
    first LEAGUE goal for Lazio then I believe his emotions are entitled
    to get the better of him. My opinion isn't based on the fact that he
    plays for England as that doesn't matter, he could be Irish, Welsh or
    Scottish.
    
    Most men won't cry in public through fear of being called a softy,
    nancy boy or whatever and because boys don't cry and daddy told them
    off for crying when they were a kid.
    
    One sign of being a man is not being afraid to cry. Woman quite like
    it in a way as it shows men do have feelings.
    
    So, sob sob, there.
    
    JN. )
129.175The tears of a clown...:-( :-(BUSSTP::DSMITHONE THOMAS BROLIN...Tue Dec 01 1992 16:4216
    
     I wonder what gushing Gazza will do if he actually wins something with
    his club or country. After all, he burst into tears when he got booked
    playing for Engerland, now he's at it again after scoring 1 goal for
    Lazio, and he was still bubbling like a baby 20 minutes after the game.
    
     I think I'll give this Saturdays's Gazzetta on Channel 4 a miss. I
    don't have enough supplies of Klennex to go round.
    
     Danny.
    
    ps On the subject of channel 4, wasn't it simply spiffingly marvellous
    to here Ray Wilkins and that other un-biased commentator heaping praise
    on the fat-boy on Sunday. The fact that they were watching and
    commentating on a different game doesn't matter, they've just got to
    get onto their knees and praise the over-rated one!!
129.176Give the lad a chance!!!!!!KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameTue Dec 01 1992 17:238

    Lads go easy on Gazzer, after all his diet consists of jelly beans and
mars bars.... and babys tend to cry no matter what the situation is!!!!!  

                                                a gu gu gu!!!!!!!!!

                                                      -dave-
129.177PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLETue Dec 01 1992 17:315
    
    Anyone who thinks Gazza is rubbish only means one thing!!!
    
      Your either Scottish, Irish or just plain jealous
    
129.178Andy can't ya read????????KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameTue Dec 01 1992 17:455
   Andy I didnt say he was rubbish, I just said he was a baby!!!!! Are ye by
any chance related!!!!!

                                                                 -dave
129.179BUSSTP::DSMITHONE THOMAS BROLIN...Tue Dec 01 1992 18:048
    
    
     I didnae say he's rubbish, just vastly over-rated.
    
     Danny.
    
    ps I'm not Scottish, Irish, Welsh, nor am I jealous of a fat turd
    like Gazza!!!!!
129.180Whats this someone has let a baby into notes...VAXVLS::CCASEYLiverpool now and forever..Tue Dec 01 1992 20:0116
    Re. -3

    God those lines sound familiar I wonder where I heard them.  Anyway
    now one said he was rubbish.  They just said he's a big baby and by the
    way you carry on sometimes wonder if ye are related(Well are ye).  Its
    not his fault he cries all the time.  I know he wants to be in the
    headlines all the time but by scoring against Roma he probably would
    have he didn't have to go overboard by crying.  Players scoring in
    their first World Cup Final wouldn't react like he did only you would
    understand it a bit more if they did.

    Again as regards him being rubbish his goal was brill. but for the rest
    of the match he was out of it..

    Colin..
    ^^^^^^^
129.181PLUNDR::MORANWell Des, it was a bit of a bobbler....Tue Dec 01 1992 20:176
    
    Gazza's a very emotional person and cannot hide his feelings. There's
    nothing too wrong with that. I like him all the more for it. He's a
    very genuine person and a typical Geordie.
                                             
    Tim
129.182PEKING::NAGLEJTue Dec 01 1992 20:1813
    
    If Gazza wants to cry then let him. There is obviously *very*
    few people who understand his burning desire to play and what
    playing football actually means to him along with winning and
    scoring goals and displaying his *RARE* talent.
    
    He loves the big occasion and Italian football is the ideal 
    stage for him. He loves to please people and nothing gives him
    more pleasure than making people happy. I seriously doubt he
    gives a toss about the headlines so therefore he doesn't grab
    them intentionaly.
    
    JN.
129.183Eric does not cry he changes clubsJRDV04::CHAMPOLLIONWed Dec 02 1992 08:0710
    The story goes he was still crying 20 minutes after the end of the
    game, in the locker room.
    
    I suppose there was too much emotion, after 16 months injured and
    several trillions Lire later, to score his first in the local derby was
    just too much.
    I don't care if he cries or moans I like his class. You can't beat
    Cantona for temper though.
    
    JF
129.184PEKING::NAGLEJWed Dec 02 1992 13:554
    
    Paul Walsh has a temper about him. Just ask Ray Clemence.
    
    JN.
129.185TRUCKS::SANTBut sir, it's *supposed* to do that!Wed Dec 02 1992 15:4816
    
    	Gazza is hyped beyond all proportion, and we're glad he's playing 
	for us!! I'm sure he could have unearthed some convaluted reason
	for playing for Wales/Scotland/Ireland/N.Ireland.. .;-)

    	So many very gifted players are not English. We have too many average
    	players playing international football right now.
  
    	But we still, and will continue to, support them and take all this
	anti-English stuff on the chin. I know we're NOT the greatest
	in the galaxy but it won't stop us wanting and trying to be...

	I don't expect you all to agree with me. I'd be amazed if you 
	did 8-)

    	Andy.
129.186AMERICA here we come !!ELIS::GEELENThu Dec 17 1992 11:3815
129.187Van whoMACNAS::CWALSHA goal a day keeps relegation awayThu Dec 17 1992 12:386
    Who is Van Vossen ???
    Never heard of him before, what club does he play for ???
    
    Was Bergkamp playing, surely he'd have scored if he was playing.
    
    Colm.
129.188PLUNDR::MORANWell Des, it was a bit of a bobbler....Thu Dec 17 1992 13:005
    
    Did Eric Viscaal play? and if so, how did he? (Newcastle may be buying
    him).
    
    Tim,
129.189Gullits back and so are the Dutch..PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Dec 17 1992 13:1814
    
    I saw the game on SKY last night.Very good result for Holland without
    Van Basten and Bergkamp.Turkey as usual were full of good Football
    until they got antwhere near the goal.
     Holland dont look good defensivly but Turkey wernt good enough to take
    advantage of it.
    
    The commentators thought the score flattered Holland,but it doesnt
    matter really they got the points and are right back in the group.
    
    Really England should beat Turkey in Turkey,we keep getting told what a
    up and coming side they are but they arent very good.
    
    Dave...
129.190Van VossenPLAYER::LESOILThu Dec 17 1992 14:4315
    
Re .- a few back
    
<<    Who is Van Vossen ???
<<    Never heard of him before, what club does he play for ???
  
    He's in Belgium for a few years now. He was playing for Beveren last
    Year, and for Anderlecht this year.
    
    Unfortunately he's not always playing as good for his team than for
    Holland. I don't think he even managed to score two goals in match
    like he's doing with his national team. Really pity because he has
    cost a lot.                                                       
    
    
129.191UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funThu Dec 17 1992 16:1814
 <<< Note 129.188 by PLUNDR::MORAN "Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler...." >>>

    
>>    Did Eric Viscaal play? and if so, how did he? (Newcastle may be buying
>>    him).
    
>>    Tim,

Tim,

he played and that is the only thing that can be said, he was more on the ground
than he ball but never got a free kick.

T_
129.192PLUNDR::MORANWell Des, it was a bit of a bobbler....Thu Dec 17 1992 16:224
    
    Thanks Ton. I wonder if Keegan has been 'put off'.
    
    Tim
129.193Dear Kevin......PLUNDR::LOWEGBlimey thats good !!Thu Dec 17 1992 16:476
    
    
    Hang on I'll ask him !!!
    
    
    Gary..
129.194TableFORTY2::ASHGrahame Ash @REOThu Dec 17 1992 17:2813
(Time for a sensible reply!)

		P  W  D  L  F  A  Pts
Norway		4  3  1  0 15  2  7
England		2  1  1  0  5  1  3
Netherlands	3  1  1  1  6  5  3
Poland		2  1  1  0  3  2  3
Turkey		4  1  0  3  5  9  2
San Marino	3  0  0  3  1 16  0

Next game on 17 Feb: England v San Marino

g
129.195ouwe lulUTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funThu Dec 17 1992 20:447
rep -1

Grahame,

your too good to be true :-)))))))

T_
129.196UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funThu Dec 17 1992 20:4614
 <<< Note 129.192 by PLUNDR::MORAN "Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler...." >>>

    
>>    Thanks Ton. I wonder if Keegan has been 'put off'.
    
>>    Tim

Tim,

I hope for Newcastle he is, 'cause the price for Viscaal is quite high
and I don't he is the kind of player who can get along in the English
League.

T_
129.197PLUNDR::MORANWell Des, it was a bit of a bobbler....Mon Dec 21 1992 13:005
129.198PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEMon Feb 15 1993 15:0525
    
    Should be an avalanche of goals at Wembley this wednesday as
    England take on the very good San Marino side. 
    England side::Woods,Pearce,Walker,Adams,Dixon,Ince,Gazza,Platt,Merson
    Barnes,Ferdinand( Wright in place of Merson if fit).
    
    I predict a score line of  ENGLAND 12  San Marino 0
    
    Gazza (6)  Platt (1)  Ince (1)  Ferdinand (1)  Adams (1) Woods (2)
    \
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
      
129.199TRUCKS::SANTNostalgia *is* what it used to be...Mon Feb 15 1993 15:4511
    
    	I think you might regret that note by Thursday morning, Andy...;-)
    
    	I'll settle for 3 or 4 nil..
    
    	
    
    
    	...to England, of course.
    
    	Andy.
129.200PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEMon Feb 15 1993 16:0411
    
    England are bound to score more against San Marino than the Jocks
    did, but lets face it the jocks are crap. I see Ireland are playing
    Wales also during the week, that should be great game between to
    sides who both lack anything to do with football. I suppose Jack 
    Charlton will come out with another excuse because his side have 
    drawn yet again and some how never seem to win any. 
    
    Sorry but i have changed my mind and I know think the score will
    be 14-0 to England with Gazza getting (8)..
    
129.201Goals galore at Wembley on Wednesday..PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCMon Feb 15 1993 16:0930
    
    Re.199
    
    3 or 4 nil would be dissapointing imo.Goals are needed and England
    will never get a better chance to score a hatfull.I saw San Marino play
    Norway and Turkey and they are without doubt the worst international
    side I have ever seen..(apart from Ireland that is)..They are
    dreadfull.
    
    England should play the most attacking line up possible,maybe only
    playing 3 at the back to allow for another attacking midfielder.We dont
    want them to get in each others way going for goals but two wingers
    should do the trick.
    
                             Woods
          
    Dixon                    Walker                Pearce
    
                              Ince
                 Gascoigne            Platt
    
      Merson       Wright        Ferdinand        Barnes
    
    
    If Wright doesnt make it then Barnes should play in the middle with
    Sharpe on the wing.
    
    I'll go for 8-0.
    
    Dave...  
129.202Who will cuddle Barnes?WARNUT::TPCASE::PICKERINGSSimon PickeringMon Feb 15 1993 17:017
>>then Barnes should play in the middle with

Barnes shouldn't play. Period. He's done nothing for England, and even less for
'pool this season.

Stick Brian Deane or Paul Warhurst down the middle; that would really rattle
San Marino.
129.203Another bad day in VMS landEBYGUM::WATTERSONPanother day another billMon Feb 15 1993 17:1417
    
    I can't see what is the fuss is about Ferdinand - is it because he
    plays for a London team and was subject to transfer speculation earlier
    in the season ? 
    
    Okay so he's scored a few goals this season, but he hasn't been a
    regular scorer for the last couple of months and the vast majority of
    his goals are scored at home.
    
    Even though he's only been playing in Jocko land, I'd rather see Hateley
    given a chance again - at least he's been consistant over the last few
    years and not some 'here today, gone tomorrow' London player - I'm
    surprised that Barmby hasn't been suggested, even if he is a good
    player, the way the MOTD commentators rave over him is vomit inducing.
    
    
    Paul                                                                   
129.204Barnes is in..so he plays.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCMon Feb 15 1993 17:2116
    
    Paul..
    
    I agree about Hately..I would have liked to see him in the squad and
    playing.After all he scored goals when he was a regular for England in
    the mid 80's.
    
    Re-2 Barnes
    As for Barnes well we have to include him as he is in the squad,I would
    much rather see Waddle getting a game,he is in much better form than
    Barnes.Graham Taylor has picked his squad and no matter who we would
    like to see playing we can only pick players from the squad..so Barnes
    plays as its very doubtfull that Taylor has included him in the squad
    and not play him.
    
    Dave...
129.205PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEMon Feb 15 1993 18:333
    
    Hately was o.k in the mid-80's but you have to remember that now
    he's playing at a very low level in the Jock league.
129.206English Premier League - overrated crapBUSSTP::DSMITHONE THOMAS BROLIN...Mon Feb 15 1993 21:549
    
    
     re last
    
     Maybe he is playing in a so-called low level Jock league, but he
    still has the ability to score and make goals. Witness his performance
    against the best the sassenachs could offer at Elland Road. 
    
     Danny.
129.207WORLD CUP HERE WE COME...........PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLETue Feb 16 1993 10:257
    
    I must admit that leeds are a very poor premier league side and it
    didnt suprise me when Rangers beat them. But you must see that Hatley
    these days plays in a league of a very low standard and for that
    reason should not be put into a side that is filled with superb
    talent and world class players, look what happened to Rangers on
    saturday.........
129.208PEKING::DAVIESGThink before you thinkTue Feb 16 1993 10:453
    6-0 : Gazza (3) Ince (1) Platt (1) Ferdinand (1) - About right.
    
    
129.209Rangers beat the best England had to offerGALVIA::SPAINThere's always the U.S.Tue Feb 16 1993 12:1511
    
    > But you must see that Hatley
    >these days plays in a league of a very low standard and for that
    >reason should not be put into a side that is filled with superb
    >talent and world class players, look what happened to Rangers on
    > saturday.........
    
    I take it you're against picking anyone from the English premier league
    then.
    
    Gary.
129.210PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLETue Feb 16 1993 12:363
    
    Dont talk crap!  Leeds got handed the league last year, how can
    you call them the best in the English league...
129.211This guy sounds like a Chelsea fan.ECCGY4::HAIGHIt's worse than that JimTue Feb 16 1993 12:531
    
129.212Nah, that would be an insult to other genuine Chelsea fans.KBOMFG::TANNERWe're one, but we're not the sameTue Feb 16 1993 13:050
129.213PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLETue Feb 16 1993 13:412
    
    Why dont you go and chew on haggis
129.214Such Eloquence.....UNTADA::BIRSETesta OSI Investigation teamTue Feb 16 1993 14:506
    That's what I like....
    
    Well thought out, constructive criticism    :^)...
    
    
    
129.215Explain your pers name.ESSB::MCUNNIFFEPool-73,76,77,79,80,82-4,86,88,90Tue Feb 16 1993 19:118
  
  <<< Note 129.213 by PEKING::BAREFIELDA "JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE" >>>
   
      Can you tell me why your personal name reads as it does. What have you
against big Jack?

    
      Cunno
129.216The Gazza support system.SHIPS::DURANT_STue Feb 16 1993 20:2729
    
    I don't reckon Graham Taylor will change the succesful team pattern he
    has found, now Gazza is back. I think he will bring in Ferdinand and 
    Barnes in as straight replacements for the injured strikers and
    encourage the back four to go forward as often as possible.
    
    We need ten goals to overtake Norway's goal difference, but I think we
    are more likely to win seven or eight nil.
    
    Expected team:
    
    				Woods
    
    			Dixon          Pearce
    
    			    Adams  Walker
    
    			Palmer  Ince  Platt
    
    				Gazza
    
    			Ferdinand    Barnes
    
    
    Remember after the Turkey game that Taylor said that the players in
    that game were the ones in possesion of their England places.
    
    			Steve.                          
    
129.217PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEWed Feb 17 1993 10:4314
    
    The England team on sky::Woods
                             Walker
                             Dixon
                             Adams
                             Dorigo
                             Palmer
                             Ince
                             Gazza
                             Platt
                             Ferdinand
                             Barnes
    
                             
129.218PEKING::DAVIESGThink before you thinkWed Feb 17 1993 10:517
    re.216;
    
    Platt is being moved into a fully attacking role with Ferdinand,
    according to the Express. Also, Ince is doubtful after he rushed home
    last night to see his ill son.
    
    GrEg...
129.219GAZZA'S RECORD !!!PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKWed Feb 17 1993 13:3623
    
    Great pictures of Gazza in the Sun today with his Gazziator oufit on.
    
    With a great little write up........
       
              ENTER THE GAZZIATOR
          
      SWORD BLIMEY!! Hail Gazza, the warrior preparing to throw San Marino
      to the Lions tonight.
      England fans will be baying for goals and Paul Gascoigne will be 
      Roman round Wembley determined to carve up the World Cup minnows.
      Let's hope Graham Taylor's GAZZIATOR can rule the show and become
      San Marino's Terminator..
    
      Love him or hate him he's a great character and a brilliant
      footballer. And if anyone can break Malcolm Macdonald's 5 goal
      record it's got to be GAZZA.
    
      I expect England to win easily and double figures isn't out of the
      question........
    
      Neil...
     
129.220Remeber where you heard it first ...SIOG::BUCKLEYManchester - Championship Free ZoneWed Feb 17 1993 14:035
    
    England 4                 1	San Marino 
      	Barnes (2)		  The postman
    	Fat Boy
    	Ferdinand
129.221Remember? - how can we forget!UNTADH::WILCOCKSONSmoke Tabs, Drink BeerWed Feb 17 1993 16:5018
    re:    -< Remeber where you heard it first ... >
    
    ...and so yet another incredibly interesting predictions note topic
    was started. Here's a few more to keep us all happy :-)
    
    	England 1  	1 San Marino
    	England 2  	1 San Marino
    	England 3  	1 San Marino
    	England 1  	2 San Marino
    	England 1  	3 San Marino
    	England 1  	0 San Marino
    	England 2  	0 San Marino
    	England 3  	0 San Marino
    	England 0  	3 San Marino
    	England 0  	2 San Marino
    	England 0  	1 San Marino
    
    Al. - let me know if I win!
129.222SUBURB::SWAINMGo on, gis a sheep...Wed Feb 17 1993 18:172
    Is Ince playing tonight? Or is his son in a bad way?
    
129.223REPAIR::WILSONWed Feb 17 1993 18:204
    
    Ince isnt playing...Batty takes his place.
    
    Dave...
129.224REPAIR::COSSEYWed Feb 17 1993 18:215
    
    
     Ince is OUT, Batty will replace him....
    
     Neil..
129.225SH*T..but still its six.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Feb 18 1993 11:1819
    
    England 6  San marino 0
    Platt 4
    Palmer
    Ferdinand/Adams
    
    England were rubbish but still got 6,hit the bar had two cleared off the
    line and missed a penalty.
    
    The only two players who played well imo were Platt and Batty.
    
    Dixon and Barnes have made there last appearence for England
    hopefully, and lets just hope Gascoignes performance was a one off,he
    was Sh*t.
    
    Still we are two points ahead of Holland with a far better goal
    difference and have a game in hand over Norway.Sitting pretty.
    
    Dave...
129.226Pathetic display.ESSB::MCUNNIFFEPool-73,76,77,79,80,82-4,86,88,90Thu Feb 18 1993 11:4812
  England 6 San Marino 0

  Apathetic display by England who found it very difficult to break down the
opposition. If I were John Barnes, I would have walked off the field. What
sort of mindless fans support England that they could boo one of their 
players everytime he touched the ball. I have seen many international games
but never saw a player from the home team subjected to such abuse. After
watching that, I hope England go out of the world cup on goal difference.


      Cunno
129.227HE'S FULL OF MORE B*LL**KS THAN TOM JONES Y-FRONTSSUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupThu Feb 18 1993 12:049
    Re 226
    
    The reason he was booed, was for the fact that he's crap.  Also I
    thought Ireland weren't much better against crap opposition, lucky to
    win via two late goals and for saying what you did about England....  
    I hope you can't get tickets to the scouse derby.
    
    
    Barry
129.228FORTY2::FOWLERMThu Feb 18 1993 12:3216
Barnes was no more crap than 10 other England players I could name, but won't
bother. There was absolutely no excuse at all for the abuse he got last night
and it is a bloody disgrace to English football that morons like that are
allowed out of whatever institutions they live in to watch the game.

The thing that bugs me is that surely whenever Graham Taylor goes to Sheffield
to watch Carlton Palmer and David Hirst he must also see Chris Waddle. Why
isn't Waddle in the team? I just don't understand....

To me, all Taylor seems to care about is work rate and not answering questions
when asked. I'm sure Lord Brian Clough or Glenn Hoddle could do better.

The best bit of the game was Peter "The Cat" Bonetti giving Woods a bit of 
practice at half time. Does he help manage the team now?

Mike
129.229Barnes OUT!!!!PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKThu Feb 18 1993 12:5417
    
    Rubbish!! Barnes has had enough chances to prove himself, yet again he
    fails to produce the goods the fans pay there money and are entitled
    to vent their anger on who they want, so it was Barnes, tough shit he's
    one of the best paid players in this country, kick him out of the
    England side then he won't have put up with the abuse, i've defended him
    on numerous occasions and like many others are fed up waiting for him
    to produce a display that warrants his pay packet. I'm afaid he's
    over weight, he's over paid and he's over stayed he's welcome in the 
    England set-up. 
    
    Poor performance last night but a 6-0 win will do for me....
    
     Neil...
    
    
     
129.230SUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupThu Feb 18 1993 12:5415
129.231Norwegian viewOSLACT::HENRIKWGood news is a bad omenThu Feb 18 1993 14:038
    FWIW: a Norwegian paper calls Barnes "a disaster" after
    last night's performance. The Norwegian coach Egil Olsen
    was "a bit impressed by San Marino, a bit disappointed by
    England".
    
    Now back to your regular abuse. ;^)
    
    Henrik
129.232RDGENG::YERKESSbring me sunshine in your smileThu Feb 18 1993 14:2419

	I watched the match last night on BBC and I must say that England
	were poor. The problem seemed to be with the final pass into
	the penalty area, often it would be hit a long the ground into
	a wall of defenders.

	A good point was made by Terry Venables in that the first goal
	came from a corner were Barnes flicked it on for Platt to score.
	John Barnes was then free at the near post for the next 17 or
	so corners, but they never used him again until later in the match.
	And when England decided to play the ball to the near post, it was
	only when San Marino had put a player in front of him.
 
	IMO the crowd were using John Barnes as a scapegoat, for it is
	difficult to believe that an England team could put in as a whole
	such a bad performance. Sad really but a sign of the times.

	Phil.
129.233Lest we Forget !!!UNTADA::BIRSETesta OSI Investigation teamThu Feb 18 1993 15:0611
    And only 3 mentions of 1966 by the Sky commentator.
    Things are improving :^)...
    
    1. Debatable 2nd goal....."Shades of 1966 there!!"
    
    2. And the recent new of Bobby Moore's illness...all the country's
       wishes are with him, even more than in 1966.
    
    3. And a 4th goal for Platt, who was only 6 weeks old when we won
       in 1966.
    
129.2341966..1966..blah blah blahBUSSTP::DREESThree good buddies were...Thu Feb 18 1993 15:3214
    
    John Motson on BBC also managed to squeeze 1966 in twice.
    
    1. Debatable 2nd goal as was mentioned in the previous note.
    
    2. When the fat boy hit the bar in the 2nd half and it came straight
       down he said "that bounced the wrong side of the line unlike Hurst
       in '66"...or something like that.
    
    What a tosser.
    
    Del.
    
    Del.
129.235FORTY2::ASHGrahame Ash @REOThu Feb 18 1993 15:5711
Re .231

Hi Henrik,

So, are Norway feeling pretty confident now? More points, better goal 
difference . . . if your newspaers are like ours, you'll be planning your US 
trips by now.

g

ps I agreed with Neil cossey's note - I'm off for a lie-down.
129.236PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEThu Feb 18 1993 16:184
    
    Whats wrong with talking about 66, at least we have past glories to 
    talk about. Anyway you better get ready becuase all your gonna hear
    soon is how we won in 94 .....
129.237Barnes is Like Liverpool!!! CRAPPEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKThu Feb 18 1993 16:3623
    
    Since the Norway game San Marino have learnt that they cant go out and
    attack, so all they do is defend and trying to break down a 11 man
    defence is difficult, if England had played San Marino the same night
    Norway did then England too would have slaughtered them and lets face 
    it England could have won by a ten goal margin last night except for
    some bad misses and enspired goalkeeping, the longer the competion
    goes on the more difficult it will be to score a hatful against them.
    So six goals might not look to bad.
    
    
    Why shouldn't the commentators refer to the 1966 World Cup when certain
    similarities occur....This is a World Cup campaign and we did actually
    WIN IT  in 1966.......And Bobby Moore was the Captain of the side...
    Geoff Hurst had a  goal controversial allowed then went on to score
    a hat trick and is the only player EVER to do this in the final..
    Sounds good every time I'm made aware of it.....
               
    Neil....
    
    
    
    
129.238and the tableFORTY2::ASHGrahame Ash @REOThu Feb 18 1993 16:3812


		P  W  D  L  F  A  Pts
Norway		4  3  1  0 15  2   7
England		3  2  1  0 11  1   5
Netherlands	3  1  1  1  6  5   3
Poland		2  1  1  0  3  2   3
Turkey		4  1  0  3  5  9   2
San Marino	4  0  0  4  1 22   0

g
129.239Coz - the full stop's on the right of the keyboardHEART::DIDCOCKThu Feb 18 1993 17:256
    
    	I agree with Neil Cossie too - but I know what you mean Graham -
    I'm exhasted after getting through the first 7-line sentence without
    breathing.
    
    C
129.240PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKThu Feb 18 1993 17:456
    
     Cliff, you think reading them are hard work you should try writing
     them......
    
     Neil...
    
129.241Where was Gazza ?SHIPS::DURANT_SThu Feb 18 1993 18:5014
    
    I was disappointed it was only six, especially as I had bet on seven
    and so had to buy the next round. 
    
    I agree Barnes wasn't very effective and neither was Gazza for some
    reason. I would have liked to have seen Sharpe on the substitutes bench
    to liven things up later on, and maybe even have tried Nigel Clough.
    
    Still six goals keeps us in the fray, as long as Poland don't get
    carried away over the next month. Watch them come up the table as they
    have two games against San Marino over the next month.
    
                                 Steve.
    
129.242You've Got To Take Your ChancesSHIPS::DURANT_SThu Feb 18 1993 19:3014
    
    If England had approached the game in the first half as they approached
    it at times in the second, more directly, then they would have tired
    out the San Marino's even more than they did. Hopefully that would have
    led to more goals.
    
    Still the real tests start coming up now, after the Turkey game, and
    England are there with one of the better goal differences. Now they
    need to collect the all important points as well. Then if it comes to
    the last game, England have the luxury of playing San Marino while the
    others have to scrap it out.
    
    			Steve.
    
129.243TRUCKS::WARDRThu Feb 18 1993 20:4711
    I was only disappointed that England didn't score at halftime - after
    all that's what the papers and everyone else predicted .......
    
    There was a program on C4 a few months ago that discussed the WC in
    Sweden - I may have mentioned it elsewhere.   Most of the fans were
    having a jolly good old time - win, lose or draw - it was life.
    All except the England fans - who were whining and complaining
    about everything and anything.   The last 20 or so notes confirm
    this.   Look on the bright side of life ?? - not likely ..
    
    Ray
129.244Even Italy couldn't be botheredHEART::DIDCOCKThu Feb 18 1993 21:1411
    
    	Moaning about the world cup in Sweden?  Well I was for one - paid
    all that money - where were Brazil - nowhere,  Argentina?  Didn't
    bother coming.  As if that wasn't enough there were no emerging nations
    to knock Scotland out.   And as if that wasn't enough - couldn't afford
    the lager.
    	I'm not going to see the world cup in Sweden again,
    
    Cliff
    
                                                          
129.245TO BOO OR NOT TO BOOMACNAS::SMORANFri Feb 19 1993 06:0310
    I don't think the BOOING of Barnes did any good for the rest of the
    players but then again they must be getting used to it, because over
    the last couple of years they are the MOST BOO'd TEAM and thats from
    their own supporters. As far as Barnes earning his wages, don't all
    English Players get paid the same ?? GASCOIGNE wasn't much use either
    but I suppose he is the darling of England at present but his day will
    come when those so called Supporters will BOO him as well. One thing
    the players won't have to worry about, is being BOO'd in June '94 .))
    
    
129.246;-)SIOG::APPS_PBManchester - Championship Free ZoneFri Feb 19 1993 13:406
    Ray
    
    You'd moan too if you spent that much money to watch that crowd of
    donkeys.
    
    Patrick.
129.247LUCKY 6, Could have been worsePEKING::MCKIENNICKFri Feb 19 1993 16:4011
    
    
         I can see England scoring more than 6 Goals AWAY from home against
         San Marino. Simply because they won't feel the presure and
         expectation's from a crowd of supporters that can't understand
         that they can't win EVERY game easily.
    
    
         NICK.
    
    
129.248Barnes...WHY!!!NEWOA::GUTHRIE_JWhat colour is the sky in your worldSat Feb 20 1993 12:1231
    Before the game I thought if we got six then that would be quite a good
    result and would more than likely be enough for our goal difference.But
    after watching the game and realising just how bad San Marino were and
    finding out (courtesy of Mr Motson) that San Marino only has a
    population of 25,000 I fear this will infact not be good enough.I mean
    come on there were 51,000 people at Wembley and if you chose carefully
    you probably could have picked a team from that lot that would have
    given San Marino a good game,if not beating them.There are teams in
    our group that will quite rightly get into doulbe figures against this
    lot,Norway have already done it,others will follow.
    
    I fear this group will end up being very tight,especially in veiw of
    Norways good start and Hollands slow start,you can almost guarantee
    that Holland will pick up quite a few points in their games to come as
    there side had too many quality players not to be in contention at the
    end.
    
    On the Barnes question I've been(as well as many others)saying for over
    two years now,why the hell is he still inculded in the squad,how many
    chances does this man need,does he need to beat Englands all time
    appearence record before he has a good game,it certainly seems that
    way.Also ponder this Tony Adams looked more dangerous going forward
    than Barnes on Wednesday and he's hardly what you would call a creative
    player.
    
    Sorry to have a whinge and moan,I also hate it when everyone in this
    country expects England to have a sparling game every time,but I just
    fear that due to this result/performance we may not qualify,and I've
    got mr heart set on going to America to watch England.
    
    Jason...The Omnipotent one.
129.249Netherlands - Turkey 3-1UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Thu Feb 25 1993 11:176
    Exciting game with two attacking teams and one terrible referee. The
    Dutch started furiously and scored 1-0 after 4 minutes. The Turks
    didn't defend but took over the initiative. With a (doubtfull) penalty
    they equalized. One minute later 2-1 by Witsge ( doubtfull too).
    The game was open untill Witschge scored 3-1 in the second half.
    
129.250San Marino get their first point!AIMTEC::WICKS_AOscar the Grouch is an Optimist!Thu Mar 11 1993 19:531
    San Marino 0 - Turkey 0 
129.251Anyone got the WC results?AIMTEC::WICKS_AOscar the Grouch is an Optimist!Thu Mar 25 1993 18:377
    San Marino played last night - anyone know the score.
    
    Any other results appreciated as once again i missed World Service.
    
    regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.2526-0 Aand No, they Did'nt WinESSB::BLONGEurope is Scouse FreeThu Mar 25 1993 18:391
129.253Same as EnglandYUPPY::PATEMANScuba Dive in my Think TankThu Mar 25 1993 18:403
    Holland 6	SM 0
    
    Paul 
129.254possible 5-a-side hall booking cock-upFORTY2::ETHERIDGElummeTue Mar 30 1993 14:124
	At what time GMT does the Turkey-England game kick off in Izmir please?

	Thanks,
		Ian.
129.255Before You Finish WorkPANIC::ANDERSONThe original MagpiesTue Mar 30 1993 14:133
    3pm GMT
    
    i.e. 4pm BST
129.256FORTY2::ETHERIDGElummeTue Mar 30 1993 14:216
	re .255

	Thanks. Looks like I'll make use of the flexible working hours, get in
	ridiculously early and get down to a Sky pub for 4.

	Ian.
129.257Your a Muddy Marvel Gazza....PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKTue Mar 30 1993 14:4815
    
    Great pictures in the Sun of Gazza and Ian Wright messing about in the
    mud at Englands training ground in Turkey. Not only is he the greatest 
    player in the world but the greatest character in the game, and with Gazza
    in this mood expect another world class performance from the genius,after
    his below performance against San Marino.
    
    It's great to see even with all the pressure he's under to succeed or
    by some people fail, he hasn't lost his sense of humour.
    
    My prediction for tomorrow nights game is  Turkey 0  England 3....
    
    Neil....
    
     
129.258Turkey v England.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Mar 30 1993 17:0221
    
    The England team to play Turkey tomorrow is:
    
    Woods
    Dixon
    Sinton
    Palmer
    Adams
    Walker
    Gascoigne
    Platt
    Wright
    Ferdinand
    Ince
    
    If Ferdinand doesnt make it Barnes will play. He is on the bench along
    with Sharpe, I cant remeber who the other subs are apart from Seaman.
    
    Dave...
    
    
129.259Your a Muddy Muppet Gazza....BUSSTP::DSMITHWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRATTue Mar 30 1993 22:2124
    
    
    re .257
    
          Neil, I'm beginning to think you're after a job as the FATMANS pr
     agent. Either that or you've developed a nasty schoolboy crush for the
     over-rated, over-weighted one.
    
          The messing around at training that has you in such ecstasy
     happens every week at football clubs all over the country. The media
     has made such an issue of it only because they have nothing else
     worthwhile to comment about.
    
    	  Under-pressure, give me a break. If I was earning the sort of
     money he is, I would still have a sense of humor. If he has yet
     another bad game, I'm sure he'll still be laughing all the way to 
     the bank.
    
         My prediction (hope, wish, prayer) for tomorrow night
    
                Turkey 1 Engerland 0
    
  
         and a stinker from FATBOY
129.260I'd shag him!!!\PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKWed Mar 31 1993 11:4914
    
    One thing Gazza's NOT is overrated, and lets face it every country
    would love to have a Gazza in there side. Except Scotland of course who
    are more interested in finding poofters to fill there frilly pink
    shirts. The man is the most talented footballer in the world with a great
    sense of humour, which is very rare in the game at the moment.
    
    As for your other comments, a little bit of Scottish jealousy I think.
    
    Prediction   Turkey 0   ENGLAND 3 
                            Gazza 3
    
    Neil....  
                    
129.261Sorry, just couldn't resist...KBOMFG::KOEPPEThink Imaginary...Wed Mar 31 1993 12:4617
 >  The man is the most talented footballer in the world with a great
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^      
 >  sense of humour, which is very rare in the game at the moment.
             ^^^^^^

I think this should read...
   
    The man is the most talented clown in the world with a great
                                 ^^^^^ 
    sense of how to play football, which is very rare in the game at the 
    moment.  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Eduard  :-) :-) ;-)

who loved to do diving headers, when the ground was soaked and muddy ;-) 
129.262What the hell is he on about!!!PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKWed Mar 31 1993 12:575
    
    re:1
         Been smoking something dodgy have we...
    
     Neil.
129.263We Think Gazza's nice!!PAKORA::DGAMBLESWed Mar 31 1993 13:0615
    
       Re last.
       
         I'm pretty sure I am speaking for the whole of the Scottish nation
       here when I wish England the best of British in their game against 
       the vastly underrated Turkish squad. 
        I also hope that extremely nice person Gazza can add a few goals
      to his tally, as he truly is the original English gent, has a super
      sense of humor and an ambassador to the game of soccer.
    
      I hope you understand that not all us Scottish folks aren't biased, 
      jelous Union hating poofters.
    
                    Daphne.
          
129.264Only a joke...KBOMFG::KOEPPEThink Imaginary...Wed Mar 31 1993 13:2810
	RE. .262

	Calm down Neil, it was only a joke! ;-)

	In fact, I quite like his sense of humour and think he is
	a very good football player.
	"The most talented player in the world" is your opinion,
	which I accept, but don't share.

	Eduard 
129.265TRUCKS::SANTNostalgia *is* what it used to be...Wed Mar 31 1993 13:318
    
    	It'll be 
    
    	Turkey 0 England 0
    
    	Another bore draw.
    
    	Andy.
129.266Wright scores....then limps off injured.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Mar 31 1993 13:4210
    
    Re-1
    
    The old fence sitters back....
    
    
    England will win, who cares if its 1-0 or 10-0, two points in the bag,
    thats all the matters.
    
    Dave...
129.267WORLD CUP HERE WE COME....PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEWed Mar 31 1993 14:355
    
    England will win 1-0 with Tony Adams getting the goal from a
    corner midway through the second half...
    
    Remember where you heard it first!!!!!
129.268Gazza gets 2, Wright and Ince the others!!!!!!!!!!PEKING::DAVIESGRemember kids - not at home!Wed Mar 31 1993 14:355
    England 4 Turkey 1 
    
    You heard it from me first.....
    
    GrEg/..
129.269Ferdinand out, Barnes in ?PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Mar 31 1993 15:115
    
    Ferdinand is definatly OUT, so it looks like Mr Blobby gets another
    chance.
    
    Dave...
129.270TRUCKS::SANTNostalgia *is* what it used to be...Wed Mar 31 1993 18:036
    
    	Dave, for how long have I been a "fence sitter" ? 8-)
    
    	Those that actually know me would suggest otherwise.....
    
    	Andy.
129.2711 UpYUPPY::PATEMANScuba Dive in my Think TankWed Mar 31 1993 20:147
    Latest -
    
    Turkey 0	England 1
    		
    		Platt 6"
    
    Paul
129.2721-0UPROAR::GAYLEBCoffee (H.S.B)Wed Mar 31 1993 20:153
    England are 1-0 up after only a few minutes
    
    David Platt
129.2732-0UPROAR::GAYLEBCoffee (H.S.B)Wed Mar 31 1993 20:572
    2-0 
    Gascoine on half time
129.274Update - Turkish Delight - NOTYUPPY::PATEMANScuba Dive in my Think TankWed Mar 31 1993 21:159
    The England crowd, players, FA officials and commentators are all being
    pelted with stones, coins etc. Also the Turkish players are kicking
    lumps out of the England players. However, the Turks have had to bring
    on their sub g'keeper.
    
    England sub - Clough for Dixon who was getting well clattered on a
    regular basis, Ince dropping back to right back.
    
    Paul
129.275CLADA::DODONNELLNothing personal.It's just business.Wed Mar 31 1993 21:195
    
    Last time Ireland played turkey, the Irish supporters recieved
    the same treatment. Hope FIFA take stern action against the Turks
    for this. This type of behaviour makes me almost want to see
    England win. ;')
129.276two pointsWOTVAX::MACDONALDIStalybridge CelticWed Mar 31 1993 22:0511
    
    Final Score:
    
    Turkey   0			England    2
    				Platt 6'
    				Gasgoine 48'
    
    				England subs were used as Dixon replaced by
    				Clough, and Wright replaced by Sharpe, both
    				injured !!!!
	Mac
129.277What a double-actBUSSTP::DSMITHWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRATWed Mar 31 1993 22:3618
    
    
     Well done Engerland on a marvellous exhibition of football against
    world-class opposition in hostile Turkey. Goals from the great double
    act of Platt and Pratt saw them pick up another 2 points in their
    world cup campaign. We should award all the players and back-room
    team with the Victoria Cross following todays game. Simply spiffing
    show from the chaps.
    
     
    
    
     ps Pass the sick bag.
    
     pps  Neil, following the title to your note .260, I think your just
    the chappie required to fill one of those frilly pink shirts. Maybe
    your just a tad jealous that you couldn't join them in the showers
    after the game. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink etc.
129.278PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEThu Apr 01 1993 11:449
    
    Great win for England, Tony Adams made some brilliant challenges
    in the box to stop the Turks from scoring, also Paul Ince had a 
    great game. Platt put England in front from a Barnes free-kick
    on six minutes, Gazza headed the second in first half injury
    time. The Turks never really looked like scoring but did their
    best to get a penalty when in the area.
    
    Andy..B
129.279Good result.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Apr 01 1993 12:2620
    
    Good solid performance from England. Adams and Walker played well
    together and despite the fact the Turks had alot of posession and
    played some good Football at times, never looked like scoring.
    
    Another two points from a potentially difficult game in difficult
    conditions. We are second in the group on goal difference, and when we
    beat Holland later this month, we will go 2 points clear of the Dutch
    with a game in hand.
    
    Re.277
    
    As usual when England win, a few jealuos McNoters come in here and
    start whinging about this and that. Yor right Turkey arent world class,
    they are probably on a par with Scotland as one of the worlds weaker
    footballing nations, never mind lads...... maybe you can organise a
    tournement next June for the likes of Turkey, San Marino and Scotland, 
    while the rest of us will be in the USA.
    
    Dave...
129.280Sorry Mod..PAKORA::DGAMBLESThu Apr 01 1993 12:403
    
     Dave,
           At least we 'jealous Mcnoters' can admit our team are Shite!! 
129.281Deja VuGALVIA::SPAINThere's always the U.S.Thu Apr 01 1993 13:238
    
    Good win for England.
    
    I hope the UEFA observer wasn't blind and deaf this time and maybe the
    Turks may get punished for pelting the players,fans and officials with
    coins.
    
    Gary.
129.282PEKING::DAVIESGRemember kids - not at home!Thu Apr 01 1993 13:3310
    
    A good win in difficult conditions.
    
    Just one thing: Why does Taylor insist on using that Planet Barnes. The
    man just cannot play for his country. Should of subbed him sooner and
    brought someone (ANYONE!) else on. Let's face facts, he's no bloody
    good. Apart from that, we played well, lets hope someone does something
    about those fouling Turks, they could have done even more damage.
    
    GrEg...
129.283FORTY2::ASHGrahame Ash @REOThu Apr 01 1993 14:336
Barnes may not be the talent we hoped he'd be but did you see the game 
yesterday? Who made Platt's goal? Who set him up for a second in the second 
half (he blasted it wide)? We haven't got that many players who can pass a 
ball that accurately . . 

grahame
129.284No complaints from me..PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Apr 01 1993 14:447
    
    re-1
    
    I agree, Barnes did ok yestarday.
    
    Dave...
    
129.285GVA02::LAINSBURYTop 6 by MayThu Apr 01 1993 16:235
    Can anyone post the table and the next lot of fixtures ? I'm sure it's
    lurking in the back of some paper.
    
    Cheers,
    Andy
129.286SUBURB::WAITEGTHE END OF SILENCEThu Apr 01 1993 16:3414
    GROUP 2
       
                  P     W     D     L      F     A      PTS
    
    Norway        4     3     1     0      15    2       7
    England       4     3     1     0      13    1       7
    Holland       5     3     1     1      15    6       7
    Poland        2     1     1     0       3    2       3
    Turkey        7     1     1     5       6    14      3
    San Marino    6     0     1     5       1    28      1
    
    
    
    * England V Holland *    
129.287SubsCLADA::JMURPHYIt's a Funny Auld game....Thu Apr 01 1993 18:344
    
    What subs did England use yesterday?????
    
    jm
129.288PLUNDR::MORANTripple ripple truffle shufflerThu Apr 01 1993 18:384
    
    Clough (for Dixon) and Sharpe (for Wright?).
    
    Tim
129.289The stupid thing is..they CAN play better.GYMAC::DCASSIDYThu Apr 01 1993 18:4628
    
    Sorry to say this to those who thought it was enjoyable, but you must
    have been watching a different game. England were rubbish. There was no 
    first time control of the ball on over 80% of requirements. They had no
    idea (including Gazza) of how to hold the ball up (as a supposed World
    class team should do !!??!!) and the only plus sign was the fact that
    they took what few chances were put their way. This might well be an
    advantage at the the end of April as I can't see the Dutch being as
    generous as Turkey i.e. on last night's showing they might be lucky to
    get one shot in against Holland. 
    	Some may have complained with the pitch...anybody see the Brazilian
    football pitches these days and the standard that's played on them. Let's
    face it, the pitch WAS the problem with England. It just goes to show 
    where the English game needs coaching. It's quite amazing that with the
    amount of time the ball is spent in the air in the English league that
    players cannot control/kill the ball first time. The amateurs from HSC
    Berlin (who incidentally got to the final of the German Cup) had more
    inclination of what to do with the ball last night than England.
    
    	I may sound annoyed...I just can't believe how a team can change so
    rapidly from one that played against Turkey 5 months ago and today.
    
    	Somebody please enlighten me....I suspect it may have something to
    do with the 'so called 'virtual' 3 hour jet-lag of flying to Turkey'
    
    Dissappointed.....
    
    Dezzz...  
129.290Blobby Gets Another Chance ?SHIPS::DURANT_SFri Apr 23 1993 19:349
    
    According to the Arsenal notes conference it would appear that Ian
    Wright has broken his toe. This means he will miss the Holland game on
    Wednesday.
    
    I suppose this means "Isotonic Gut" Barnes will take his place !!!
    
    				Steve.
    
129.291PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCFri Apr 23 1993 19:4911
    
    Some reports are saying Wright would have only made the subs bench
    anyway, with Taylor prefering Platt and Ferdinand in attack.
    
    Merson could come in for Platt in midfield, he's in good form. Barnes 
    should'nt be playing at all, Lee Sharpe should be in the team in front 
    of Barnes. 
    
    Or maybe Teddy Sheringham could get his big chance.....
    
    Dave...
129.292TVXSTACY::KMCGRATHLong road, patient donkeyMon Apr 26 1993 18:222
What time is this match on at and whats the TV coverage like?

129.293TRUCKS::SANTNostalgia *is* what it used to be...Mon Apr 26 1993 18:358
    
    	err...
    
    	8pm? It'll be taped and played on Sportsnight, at 10pm I expect...
    
    	Live on R5 though...
    
    	Andy.
129.294ProblemsSHIPS::DURANT_SMon Apr 26 1993 20:2114
    
    What is happening with England's left back position. With both Dorigo
    and Pearce injured is Taylor intending to use Sinton ? Is Beresford
    from Newcastle selected or is he going to use Keown out of position ?
    Looks like a dodgy area in England's team to me, especially with Gullit 
    wandering around there.
    
    I presume the game is live on Sky Sports on Wednesday ?
    
    			Steve.
    
    
    
    
129.295FORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTATue Apr 27 1993 15:453
>>    I presume the game is live on Sky Sports on Wednesday ?
    
 Yep
129.296Julian Dicks is yer manHEART::DIDCOCKTue Apr 27 1993 17:186
    
    	If Stuart Pearce can't play,  the obvious choice has to be Julian
    Dicks.   Good crosser of the ball,  whacks the free-kicks,  and if
    anyone ever deserved the nick-name psycho Julian is a must.
    
    	Cliff
129.297He Who Worships Mark Dennis ......PANIC::ANDERSONThe original MagpiesTue Apr 27 1993 17:256
    Re .296
    
    ....but I think England will need 11 players for the whole 90
    minutes....
    
    Rob
129.298Irish interest in the game tomorrowGALVIA::SPAINThere's always the U.S.Tue Apr 27 1993 17:3912
    
    I'm sure all Irish football fans will support our close friends and
    near neighbours from across the water in Wembley tomorrow night.  With
    the many cultural similarities and the great friendships forged during
    our recent World Cup and European championship meetings we'll have our
    fingers crossed for our close friends.
    
    
    
    So Come on Holland.  
    
    Gary. 
129.299change of heart???ESSB::BREETue Apr 27 1993 18:105
    Yes Gary,
    
    Nice to see you're coming round a bit!!!
    
    Paul
129.300Wot's the line up then?UKARC1::ELANGCOTue Apr 27 1993 18:245
Anyone care to speculate? As of this morning England have a full squad including
Nigel Winterburn. Is Wright available?


Should be a good  match!
129.301yeah....PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Apr 27 1993 18:2611
    
    Re-2
    
    Gary..
    
    The feelings mutual...
    
    Come on You Danes...and come to think of it lets hope that Portugal
    spank the Jocks.
    
    Dave...
129.302England 1 Holland 3UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funTue Apr 27 1993 18:5521
         <<< Note 129.298 by GALVIA::SPAIN "There's always the U.S." >>>
                    -< Irish interest in the game tomorrow >-

    
>>    I'm sure all Irish football fans will support our close friends and
>>    near neighbours from across the water in Wembley tomorrow night.  With
>>    the many cultural similarities and the great friendships forged during
>>    our recent World Cup and European championship meetings we'll have our
>>    fingers crossed for our close friends.
    
      
    
>>    So Come on Holland.  
    
>>    Gary. 

Gary,

good on you, hope to see you in the States in 1994!!!!!!

T_
129.303predictionESSB::BREETue Apr 27 1993 21:067
    England are no mugs, especially at home, so given that Gascoigne is fit
    my prediction is:
    
    England 1               Holland 1  
      Platt                   Bergkamp
    
    
129.304PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Apr 28 1993 12:2523
    
    England Team for tonights game...
    
    Woods
    Dixon
    Keown
    Walker
    Adams
    Palmer
    Ince
    Gascoigne
    Barnes
    Ferdinand
    Platt
    
    
    I hope Holland play like there U21's did last night, they were awfull.
    (England won 3-0). 
    
    This will be the hardest game in the group so far, but Holland have
    struggled in the group so far. I go for a 2-0 win for England.
    
    Dave...
129.305England to win comfortably!!!PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKWed Apr 28 1993 13:098
    
    Not a bad side, still have my doubts about not playing a recognized
    left back, I still think we will over come a Holland side who are
    marginly better than Turkey at the moment.. 
    
    England 2  Holland 0
                   
     Neil..
129.306ECCGY4::HAIGHDyslexia comes in a glassWed Apr 28 1993 14:005
    >I still think we will over come a Holland side who are
    >marginly better than Turkey at the moment.. 
    
    	So about the same as us then! I'll go for bore-draw. And the same
    in Dublin.
129.307Forever an optimist....GVA05::BURKHALTERWed Apr 28 1993 14:205
    I'll go for a 2-1 win for England with the winner coming from 
    a Gascoine free kick in the last few moments, this to make up for the
    disalowed one against Holland in the last World Cup.
    
    -Dom
129.308goodbye jocksPEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEWed Apr 28 1993 14:5110
    
    Tonight will be a great moment for us English lads, pounding Holland
    and seeing the Jocks out of the world cup.. I dont know why they
    bother entering, probably so when they do actually get there they
    give us a good laugh by getting hammered by Costa Rica and other
    crap sides.
    
       England 1 Holland 0
    
       Adams..
129.309BUSSTP::DREESThree good buddies were...Wed Apr 28 1993 15:139
    
    re. last
    
    Another wonderful witty reply from the skin headed one.......
    
    Still, not to rise to the bait this Scot will go for a narrow
    1-0 victory for Engerland. 
    
    Del.
129.310It 'll be boringUTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Wed Apr 28 1993 15:503
    A boring draw : 0-0.....because they both go for this....
    
    John
129.311SON OF HITLER...PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEWed Apr 28 1993 15:544
    
    There is no way that this match will be a 0-0 draw, you must  be
    thinking of the Ireland v Denmark, cause when ever they play anyone
    half decent its always a 0-0 draw..
129.312England 1966, 1994FORTY2::FOWLERMWed Apr 28 1993 16:037
2:0 to England, with Les Ferdinand scoring both.

Expect to see Bergkamp play no part in the game, due to being either 
a) marked by the English defense
b) kicked in the head by Tony Adams

Mike
129.313Adams for Dutch cap..PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEWed Apr 28 1993 16:523
    
    
    Or dropped by Tony Adams you mean...
129.314We'll see to that !UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Wed Apr 28 1993 18:035
    re -1,-2
    Bergkamp is still from Ajax : No one can stop him then himself.....
    By shooting against the keeper or next the goal.....
    I don't think that anyone of the english defense is able of stopping
    him ! OK by foul play, very foul play......
129.315Bergkamp, WHO!PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKWed Apr 28 1993 18:598
    
    Bergkamp is an average Dutch league player and I'm afraid he will up
    against a tough quick English defence. I'm afraid he won't pose any
    problems your chance of getting a goal was gone when Van Basten was 
    ruled out through injury.
    
    Neil.
     
129.316Bergkamp, shmergkamp.FORTY2::FOWLERMWed Apr 28 1993 19:025
Bergkamp has no chance against our defense.

He'll be substituted before the end of the game, or I'll eat my hat. 8-)

Mike
129.317ECCGY4::HAIGHDyslexia comes in a glassWed Apr 28 1993 19:057
    
    	And as for Gullit and Rijkard, they're just average players in
    average Italian league, and if Koeman was playing it wouldn't make any
    difference because he's just an average player in an average Spanish
    league. 
    
    	Hey this wind-up thing's easy! Thanks for the template!
129.318FORTY2::FOWLERMWed Apr 28 1993 19:087
Good innit..

de Wolf? pah. get a haircut you hippy.

Wouters? I'd rather play David Burrows

Who else have they got?
129.319England 1 Holland 3UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funWed Apr 28 1993 20:1817
rep last few

What a shame if England gets beaten tonight by a bunch of average players
from Holland.

You know what, forget about the if 'cause you get beaten! :-)))))

I really don't know but how can you say you've got a good team if you're
best player ie Waddle isn't even in the squad.

I would like to thank mr. Taylor for putting Donkey Adams in the squad
never seen such a slow donkey in my life, the Dutch attackers will be past
him before he has waken up.

Good luck tonight chaps.

T_
129.320UKARC1::ELANGCOWed Apr 28 1993 20:438
re -.1

It was a shame this donkey kept the best player quite on April the 18th
wasn't it?

I think Winterburn is better bet than Keown for left back. It is going to
be a tough one if Rijikard, Gullit and Winter play their best. Anyway England
are not going to loose. 
129.321Ireland drew, Scotland are losing...TRUCKS::SANTNostalgia *is* what it used to be...Thu Apr 29 1993 01:247
129.322good to hear...EICMFG::HOWEThe sinking ship.. has SUNK!!Thu Apr 29 1993 01:294
    
    Thanks!!! I was starting to get the idea we were losing!
    
    Keith.
129.323How did it finish?AIMTEC::WICKS_Aon the Streets of San FranciscoThu Apr 29 1993 02:361
    
129.324NOT !!!!!!KIRKTN::CPATRICKYou Aint Seen Nothing,YETThu Apr 29 1993 02:437
    
    England 2  Holland 3
    
    Barnes     Bergkamp 3
    Platt
    
     SQF Jambo    
129.325Lots of hat eating tomorrow?AIMTEC::WICKS_Aon the Streets of San FranciscoThu Apr 29 1993 03:016
    So Bergkamp scores 3 - bet the authors of .315 and .316 will keep their
    heads down in the morning!!
       
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.326What I saw...CLARID::KREYERAndre KREYER - ValbonneThu Apr 29 1993 04:0125
    <<< Note 129.325 by AIMTEC::WICKS_A "on the Streets of San Francisco" >>>
>                       -< Lots of hat eating tomorrow? >-
>
>    So Bergkamp scores 3 - bet the authors of .315 and .316 will keep their
>    heads down in the morning!!

	I guess the author of .324 was pulling someones legs... or I've
	seen an edited version of that game.
	
	What was shown in France ended 2 - 2 with Holland scoring on a
	(deserved) penalty with 3 minutes to go...
	
	And a round of humble pie for a couple of Englishmen...
	
	Short comment: great first half, but most of the second was a non
	event. I still fail to understand what Carlton PALMER and John 
	BARNES were supposed to do in the telly. The first one can't pass
	a ball to one of his team mates and the second got back sleeping
	after a great start (this only lasted 2 minutes).
	
	By the way, where was Gascoigne during the second half? I thought
	he must be your best player by the tune of certain notes in here! 

	Completely biased,					.Andre.

129.327PAKORA::AMILLARAnd some late news just in...Thu Apr 29 1993 04:337
    
    What an absolutely disastrous result for England. I doubt that the
    country, never mind the team, will recover from this. The word I have
    is that they were lucky to score at all, and that both goals were
    offside deflections. 
    
    
129.328KIRKTN::DGAMBLESThu Apr 29 1993 05:258
    
     re last-
     
     If required, us 'jocks' will aid the recovery program..
     It seems the English lads just can't handle the big stage!
         
                         Concerned noter.              
                          
129.329KIRKTN::AMILLARAnd some late news just in...Thu Apr 29 1993 05:399
    
    It was either Confuscious or Nostradamis who once said,
    
    "A 2-2 draw at home is like losing 6-0 away from home"
    
    ....and I would have to agree.
    
    Archie
    
129.330Excellent Game...PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKThu Apr 29 1993 11:5117
    
    Great performance, great game, England thoughly deserved a victory last
    night with there best performance under Graham Taylor. Contrary to what
    the last few notes have said(bitter Jocks) England can take heart from
    this performance. With a game in hand they will still qualify with who
    I'm not sure....Is this the last we'll see of Gullit in a Holland
    shirt ?. 
    
    Disapointed with a draw as the performance deserved a win, were
    still in there which is more than I can say for a certain team
    North of the border.
    
    I'll take back what I said about Berkamp, he looks the part and when
    Van-Basten is back they will prove a formidable partnership.
    
    Neil...                                             
    
129.331PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEThu Apr 29 1993 11:5217
    
    What a brilliant display of football, John Barnes scoring in the first
    minute from a free kick. That goal must John Barnes place in the side
    for the next two years. The Dutch had trouble containing the pure
    brilliance of the might Gazza so gave him a couple of elbows to see
    that he didn't return for the second half. The Dutch at the end of 
    the game looked as if they had given up until they got a penalty, which
    they scored to make it 2-2. Les Ferdinand had a penalty turned down
    when a Dutch defender had taken his legs away in the box.
    
    The night ended happy when the score of
    
                Portugal 5   Jocks 0
    
       hooray! hooray! hooray! hooray! hooray! hooray! hooray!
    
    Andy...B    
129.332Dissapointing Result....great game.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Apr 29 1993 12:2011
    
    Its dissapointing, its another game that we should have won at home. I
    hope these lost points wont cost us. Very good game, England deserved
    to win as they easily contained the Dutch apart from a moment of magic
    from Bergkamp. They didnt create anything in the second half, apart
    from the penalty. No arguements about that.
    
    Still we didnt lose, and are still in there. Norway looked very
    vunerable against Turkey in the first half. We can go there and win.
    
    Dave... 
129.333General commentsXSTACY::JLUNDON@GAO 822-4715 Leeds ChampionsThu Apr 29 1993 12:508
Engalnd, fair play, fought well last night and were a little unlucky not to 
come away with a win.

Does anyone think that Walker should have been sent off for the penalty as the
letter of the law demands that his foul was of the profesional type - pulling
down the man with no one to beat except the goalie?

                                James.
129.334Norway and who??ESSB::BREEThu Apr 29 1993 13:3711
    I am no fan of England's but I must say that last night's game showed
    them in a very good light. They were quite like Germany the way they
    moved the ball forward so directly. 
    
    All in all they can feel unlucky but surely with less than 5 minutes to
    go there's come a time to start hoofing the ball out of the park
    instead of passing it about?
    
    cheers,
    
    Paul
129.335FORTY2::ABRAHAMSThu Apr 29 1993 13:502
Do you want some salt with that hat, Mike?
129.336There's no justiceFORTY2::FOWLERMThu Apr 29 1993 14:0223
I was not entirely serious when I was slagging the Dutch players yesterday, but
I am now.

What a dirty bunch of gits. England may not have the attacking flair of the Dutch
but at least we don't get up to the sort of disgraceful behaviour chaps like
Wouters, de Wolf, and the bloke that chopped Les Ferdinand down did last night.

From what I saw on Sportsnight we were unlucky to only draw, and at least two
of the Dutch defenders should have been sent off.

I am normally a man of my word, and I was more than happy to chow down on a 
tasty bowler but I shan't now because we were robbed and a draw was a crime of 
mammoth proportions. 

Holland a class team? My backside they are.

England and Norway for USA '94 and good riddance to Holland.

Bergkamp and Wotsisface the other striker were a bit flash though.

See, completely unbiased. 8-)

Mike
129.337ECCGY4::HAIGHDyslexia comes in a glassThu Apr 29 1993 14:0717
    
    	I don't know about Walker being sent off for the penalty incident,
    but what an absolutely STUPID thing to do! I saw Walker get played of
    the park by Papin recently, and with that incident he seems to be 
    seriously off-form.
    
    	I thought that .315 was a wind-up, were you serious about thinking
    Bergkamp was average? He's scored brilliant goals like that
    consistently in the last two years.
    
    	I only saw very brief highlighs on German telly last night, but
    England looked to be quite good for a change. I still think G Taylor is
    a waste of space though. 
    
    	Wouters elbow on Gasgoigne was terrible! Although to be fair to the 
    ref, it was only noticeable on the slow motion replay. A 4th official 
    with camera assistance would surely have red carded him.
129.338PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Apr 29 1993 14:2514
    
    Des Walker should have been sent off really, but why didnt he just bring
    him down outside the box ???. He was going to bring him down anyway, so
    he should have just pulled him down and faced the concequences but
    outside the box.
    
    Wouters should also have been sent off, the ref obviousley saw
    something as he gave a free kick. Gascoigne was playing well, Wouters
    new exaclty what he was doing.
    
    The group is very tight now, and the pressure is on England, as we now
    face 4 away games and only Poland at home.
    
    Dave... 
129.339Norway in 5 weeksFORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTAThu Apr 29 1993 14:3038
Do FIFA do what the FA does as concerning trial by television. If so I think
Wauters should be s***ing himself. That challange on Gascoigne was the most
blatant of its kind I've seen, and he should be punished for it. He was lucky 
he didn't break Gazza's jaw.

A good game for England, Great start, but very disappointing to give away a 2
goal lead. Barnes Free kick was excellent, and the 2nd was well worked, with a
good strikers finish.

Bergkamp's goal oozed class, and it had to be said that Holland deserved the
goal. However, although I have no argument about the penalty (I think Walker was
very lucky to play 90 minutes), Holland didn't deserve the draw, on the balance
of play in the second half. 

Ferdinand should have booked himself a permanent place in the team on his
performance. Only by being fouled ( should have been a penalty ) and an
excellent last gasp tackle did the Dutch keep him from scoring.

Palmer was superb. No he can't pass. Yes he looks awkward on the ball. But he
was always in the thick of the action, causing problems for the Dutch.

I was disappointed with Merson, especially after his performance last week. He
seemed too intent on going for the glory than playing the easy ball.

Gullit & Rijkard were invisible for most of the game, which shows what a good
job the defense did at keeping them out.

It was the first game I've seen since getting Sky Sports, and I think
I'll stick to the radio commentry. What is Andy Gray on????

disappointing score from the Stadium of light though.

Other results in the group yesterday.

	Norway	3 - 1	Turkey
	Poland	1 - 0	San Marino

Al
129.340ARNIES::SMITHP1What became of the Rumbleows Cup ?Thu Apr 29 1993 14:324
	Very well summed up Al, especially the bit about Andy Gray.

		p1
129.341Are we suitable for US '94 ?UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Thu Apr 29 1993 14:4221
    Mike, you like some dutch coffee with your hat ????? ;-)
    
    Great game, what an opening, what an end. You can discuss a lot of
    things that happened during the play but I think the overall result was
    a deserved result for both teams (though lucky, I must admit).
    It was a very sportive event, it didn't deserve any red or yellow cards
    at all. Also not in the end at the penalty. Normally referees give that
    card but it was absolutely not necessairy to give a card. And he didn't
    do that. In the beginning I thought it was going to be a big score for
    England. After that quick goal it didn't look good, I think our coach
    had a little bit to optimistic (=attacking) team in the field. After
    the gate was a bit more closed, the dutch could give some resistance.
    But playing their own football, thanks to the english this never
    occurred........Two brilliant moments were however enough to make even.
    I am looking forward to the homeplay !
    
    Talking about Wouters, didn't one of you mention before that Bergkamp
    and Gullit would be kicked out ?????? And now you've problems with that
    high jump from Wouters ?????? ;-)
    
    John               
129.342FORTY2::FOWLERMThu Apr 29 1993 14:5419
I don't know. What is Dutch coffee like?

I am trying to be objective about the game. From a neutral standpoint I would 
have to say that England deserved two points, if not more.

No-one deserved a yellow card? Surely some mistake. Wouters should be banned 
forever for what was a deliberate attempt to take a player that was running rings
round the Dutch defence out of the game.

Bergkamp was okay I suppose, and Obermaas (sp? probably not even close) was very
fast, but Gullit and Rijkaard were never in it. One of the best bits of the game
was watching supposed donkey Carlton Palmer breeze past supposed football genius
Dennis Bergkamp.

We'll pan you in the return leg if we have Gazza.

Bad luck though. we'll send you a postcard from the USA.

Mike
129.343re: .342JGO::ARTZThu Apr 29 1993 15:247
    If panning Holland depends on wether this Gazza guy plays or not, then
    	you don't have a team.......
    
    Gerard
    
    p.s. I agree Wouters should have had a card for that, but let's be
         fair, Gazza isn't an angel either...
129.344GT (middle name begin with `i' by chance?)HEART::DIDCOCKThu Apr 29 1993 15:3318
    
    	Not sure about Gazza running rings round anyone,  but he was badly
    missed in the second half.   Graham Taylor's decisions are usually very
    hard to fathom,  but the combination of Palmer, Ince, Barnes and Gazza
    worked very well,  a couple of ball-winners (Palmer came up with the
    ball from numerous challenges) and a couple of footballers. (I think
    Clough might have been a better replacement for Gazza?)
    
    	Agree with earlier comment re: Les Ferdinand - the team need his
    pace (and workrate) - he should keep his place.
    
    	Graham Taylor seems to be acquiring a sense of humour too -
    interviewed after the game on sportsnight
    
    Reporter:  "Would you say the first dutch goal was the turning point?"
    GT: "Well it didn't help"
    
    Cliff
129.345living by the sword..ESSB::BREEThu Apr 29 1993 15:3311
    Why all the fuss about the injury to Gascoigne?
    
    If I recall correctly he was the guy who committed some atrocious fouls
    in the 1991 cup final before self inflicting.
    
    Part of his trade is physical presence and he seems to revel in it.
    
    The old saying, "don't give it if you can't take it" would seem
    applicable.
    
      Paul
129.346Wouters should have seen redYUPPY::PATEMANScuba Dive in my Think TankThu Apr 29 1993 16:1126
    The "fuss" is about a deliberate elbow in the face that was thought to
    have broken someones cheek bone. Yes gazza did commit a couple of fouls
    in the Cup Final and would have been punished if the ref hadn't been a 
    total dork.
    However, Gazza is not known as deliberately dirty. For once I agree
    with Jimmy Hill that Wouters committed an act of "thuggery". In the
    Premier League, video evidence would have him banned for several games,
    I hope FIFA think about similar tactics.
    
    The Dutch looked to have a number of average and past their sell by
    date players. England looked a couple of players short of a very classy
    act. They need a better right back (Rob Jones?) and a real left back
    (Stuart Pearce), plus a wide player. Barnes did well but was still only
    around about 70% of the time. A fit John Salako, Lee Sharpe or Tony
    Daley would give a better balance. Shearer will also lead the line a
    bit better (although Ferdinand did well, he is not a prolific scorer)
    
    Personally, I would prefer Seaman or Martyn to Woods but there is
    little to choose. Woods is a bit weak in the "kick from a back pass"
    department.
    
    Still, good game, generally good performance and I don't think England
    have to worry overly much about going to Poland and Norway.
    
    Paul
    
129.347Hup Holland GALVIA::SPAINThere's always the U.S.Thu Apr 29 1993 16:1111
    
    I saw the last 15 minutes on SKY and the highlights on BBC.  When Peter
    Van Vossen scored the penalty the whole pub erupted.  I never knew
    there were so many Dutchmen in Galway.  :-)
    
    From what I saw England deserved to win but they threw it away.  They
    have an uphill battle now to qualify.  England have only beaten Turkey
    and San Marino.  2 draws at home to Holland and Norway does not inspire
    confidence.  Group tables can be very deceptive.
    
    Gary.
129.348TRUCKS::SANTNostalgia *is* what it used to be...Thu Apr 29 1993 18:2223
    
        re .347...
    	
    	Big deal, Gary..I can't imagine many Englishmen give a bugger
    	how many NON-ENGLISH (as this is what it amounts to..) people
    	there were in a pub in Galway last night 8-(
    
    	They're all as bad as boned-headed English "supporters" who revel
    	in other Home Nations misery...I'm suprised - I thought that sort 
    	of crap was beneath you.
    
    	England played quite well. Holland deserved the draw for playing
    	for 90 minutes rather than 87. We missed Gazza in the second half,
    	nasty elbow from Wouters but if it was Adams it would "all be part
    	of the game". On balance we were well worth a point.
    
    	Nothing to worry about. If we put that side out on the park for
    	the remaining ties in this group we will qualify. Yes, I know that
    	means a reprieve for Barnes, but I admit it - he played well!
    
    	Ince was superb. Bergkamp was excellent - what a goal.
                                                            
    	Andy.
129.349Though given half the chance :-)FORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTAThu Apr 29 1993 18:4011
re -.1
>> We missed Gazza in the second half, nasty elbow from Wouters but if it was 
>> Adams it would "all be part of the game"

Andy,

	Even if it had been Jeremy Beadle, Wouters action against Gascoigne has
absolutely no place on the Football field, and FIFA should do something to stop
players thinking they can get away with it, even if the ref didn't see it.

Al
129.350TRUCKS::SANTNostalgia *is* what it used to be...Thu Apr 29 1993 18:4813
    
    	Al, I agree. I didn't condone what Wouters did.
    
    	However, I stand by what I said. We are very qucik to cry "foul"
    	if it's against us, but our own players have done similar things
    	and it's suddenly "a man's game", "accidental clash of heads", 
    	"tried to play the ball"...etc. Chose one of those.
    
    	If we really want trial by FIFA/TV/other, we'd better understand
    	the full implications.
    
    	Andy.
    	
129.351WHAT ?????PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Apr 29 1993 19:2514
    Re-1
    
    Andy..
    
    That is rubbish....When Terry Butcher head butted a player a couple of
    years ago playing for England he was slaughtered in the papers.
    
    Despite all the b*locks written in here, no player would have been
    defended for doing anything like Wouters did last night.
    
    Dave...
    
    
    
129.352SUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupThu Apr 29 1993 19:4114
    Re 348
    
    As much as I hate to say it but I have to agree with Andy at the start
    of his mail.  As a moderator I feel Gary should show more responsability
    instead of trying to start more home nation arguments.  
    
    Well done Andy.
    
    Unfortunatly though your comments about Tony Adams was complete crap.  
    
    
    Thanks All
    
    Barry 
129.353PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEThu Apr 29 1993 19:544
    
    Andy..
    
       Are you really as boring as you make out...
129.354PEKING::WARBURTONGIs it herbal deficiency Doc??!Thu Apr 29 1993 20:1331
     
    
         Why do the Irish/Foreigners slag off English football when most of
    them support English teams . No wonder teams like Cork City & Derry
    City will never win anything good . They don't get the support because
    the whole of the bloody country wants to come over and watch the likes
    of Leeds & Everton play.  
    
         If your going to slag off the England team then why bother coming
    other here at all to watch domestic matches , after all Chelsea , Leeds
    and Everton fans etc should show a bit of loyalty.  
    
    
       
                
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                   Warbutong
    
    
    
    
    
129.355TRUCKS::SANTNostalgia *is* what it used to be...Thu Apr 29 1993 20:146
129.356FORTY2::FOWLERMThu Apr 29 1993 20:4431
Re: -2

I think the reason that all these people slag off the English national side
but still support English league teams is the simple fact that their own 
players are crap. The Republic only started winning when Big Jack took over and
scrounged his team from the castoffs of the English league. Similarly how many 
of the Welsh team actually play in the Welsh league? Answer: none.

The only exception to this is Scotland, and we don't need to say anything about
the state of their national team...

This is not to say that Irish players or Welsh players are crap themselves, just
that all the ones who are even half decent play in the English league because
the domestic leagues are rubbish. 

Be honest. Could you bear to support Inter Cardiff when you have real quality
football just down the road in the English league?

I think recent results have shown that of the home countries only England can
seriously be considered a decent footballing nation, while Scotland, Wales, and
Northern Ireland are forever doomed to languish among the Maltas and San Marinos
of the world. Never mind lads. We won't mind you all flocking to our cause in 
94. 8-)

Note that I exclude the Republic from the last generalisation, although I am
confident that if they didn't get all their players from the English league via
dubious ancestral connections with Ireland, they too would be an easy 2 points.

No offence intended. Just my humble opinion. 8-)

Mike
129.357FORTY2::FOWLERMThu Apr 29 1993 20:456
Oops sorry. That should be "their own leagues are crap."
                                      -------

many apologies.

Mike
129.358In defence of Inter CardiffAIMTEC::WICKS_Aon the Streets of San FranciscoThu Apr 29 1993 20:549
    Mike,
    
    What are you trying to say - Inter Cardiff knocked Cardiff City out of
    the Welsh Cup and it looks as if Cardiff City might win the English
    3rd Division.
    
    regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.359Why Scotland and Wales but not EnglandGALVIA::SPAINThere's always the U.S.Thu Apr 29 1993 22:4135
    
    There is a vast gulf in standards between the English league and the
    leagues here in Ireland or Wales.  I don't think anyone would dispute
    the fact.  Most people here support English football teams.  We get
    British television and there is huge interest in the English league.  
    
    This should logically translate into support for the English national
    team.  Certainly virtually everyone here would support Scotland or
    Wales against continental opposition.
    
    There is a minority of people in this country who hate everything
    English but they also hate football because it is seen as an English
    game.  Most Irish fans dislike the English national team because of the
    incredible arrogance of sections of the media - Jimmy Hill,John Motson
    et al.  Other examples of this can be found in this conference.  If you
    don't know what I mean ask some of the Rangers fans.  It can get a bit
    tiresome listening to how wonderful England are.
    
    England played very well last night.  Judging from the highlights they
    should have won the game.  It should have been Taylor's finest hour and
    yet it has turned out to be a very bad result which leaves
    qualification in doubt.Peter Van Vossen has saved us hours of talk
    about how they're going to win the world cup.
    
    I know the goal must have been a sickening blow to the many decent
    English fans.  i know how they feel and I've felt the same way myself
    in the past.  But at the arrogant neanderthal minority all i can do is
    laugh.
    
    BTW Holland are one of my favourite International sides anyway.  I do
    hope they qualify and I generally want them to win even when they don't
    play England.  Most Irish fans would have similar sympathies for the
    Dutch and this made the equaliser all the sweeter.
    
    Gary. 
129.360Well said that man.YELBUS::DSMITHWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRATThu Apr 29 1993 23:5411
 
    Well said Gary, I guess most football fans north of the border would echo
   most of what you have said.

    Personally, I thought England played very well last night and deserved to
   win the game, but I'm afraid I cannot wish them good luck in their future
   matches. However, I will say I'm glad Scotland don't have to meet them in
   the near future!!!

     Danny.
129.361Saxons & Celts!SUBURB::ONEILLSFri Apr 30 1993 02:1128
    Mike,
    
    I watched the game in my local last night with a SPanish
    colleague...and guess who we were secretly cheering for!
    
    Frankly, I was amazed at the quality of England's performance.  However
    I was even more amazed to see one of the audience jump in delight at
    the first Dutch goal...turns out he was a Scot...and guess
    what...Scotland's score came across the screen in sharp bursts soon
    after.  He who laughs last...no harm in a bit of fun at the end of the
    day.
    
    On the subject of ancestry, take a look at the England team at least
    half of whom could hardly be described as Saxons!  It's getting tiring
    listening to the moans about the Irish team's ancestry...maybe it's
    because they are anything but an easy two points.  If their parents are
    Irish so are they no matter where they live...simple as that.
    
    By the way, I thought England deserved to win last night.  
    
    Shane
     
    
     
    
    
    
    
129.362GAZZA BEWARE! WOUTERS...CRACK!!KBOMFG::KOEPPEThink Imaginary...Fri Apr 30 1993 11:1816
    Last night I saw the foul on Gazza on SKY NEWS and, as a neutral
    observer in this case ;-), I must say that it was an awful attack
    and Wouters certainly deserves a punishment. 
    Before I saw it on telly, I thought it was one of those clashes as
    in the Euro Championship match between Germany and Scotland, but
    Wouters knocked him deliberately by taking a swing before hitting
    him.
    Apparently, Gazza has broken his cheekbone and will quite likely
    miss the next two qualification matches. I guess had the blow been
    further down, he would have broken a few ribs instead. :-(
    Perhaps it would be a good idea to ban Wouters for the same amount
    of matches as Gazza is missing.
    
    Just my opinion,
    
    Eduard
129.363PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKFri Apr 30 1993 11:5521
    
    I caught a bit on the news last night that Gazza needs an operation
    on his cheek, can anyone confirm this ?. More importantly will he miss 
    any of the qualifiers coming up..
    
    Re: last few.
    This is getting really boring, frankly I and many others don't care
    what you think, regarding the commentators many of us find them
    irriating, but most of them are English WHY shouldn't they shout for 
    there Country. I seem to remember a certain Jack Charlton creaming his
    pants over John Seridan in a recent televised game, quite frankly he was
    embarrasing but the only reason he done it was because he played for
    the Republic. What are you saying that we should have neutral
    commentators, some how I don't think so, imagine a Scottish commentator
    we would have to have subtitles, it's bad enough watching Taggert....
    
    
    Neil...
     
     
     
129.364Who's running this show anywayUNTADH::BIRSETesta OSI Investigation teamFri Apr 30 1993 12:1912
    
    re. -1
    
    Doesn't seem to be a problem for your players. They seem to be able to
    understand :
    
    
    	Alex Ferguson, Kenny Dalglish, George Graham etc....
    
    			:^)...
    
    
129.365TMOFITW - FAZZASTKOFF::SPERSSONPas de problemeFri Apr 30 1993 12:2717
    
    Three observations:
    
    1) Before I started following football notes, I could sometimes cheer
    for England. Now I want them to lose almost as badly as Denmark. What do
    you think is the reason,::BAREFIELDA, ::COSSYEN et al?
    
    2) Commentators on national TV are biased towards the national team. In
    most countries this is no problem because an overwhelming majority of
    the viewers of national TV are biased towards the national team too. In
    the UK however, the national TV covers the area of 4-5 national teams,
    which causes most of the debate exemplified lately (and we've seen it
    many times before, do you remember the 'Great Walt Gallacher Crusade'
    in '90). There is only one solution to the situation: allow only ONE
    national team per national TV coverage area.
    
    3) Poor Wouters. I hope he didn't hurt his elbow.
129.366There's Scottish Jocks and your English Jocks!!PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKFri Apr 30 1993 12:299
    
    Re: 1 
    
    They are English Jocks, you can also add to that list Dennis Law,
    Alan Hansen Andy Gray and Ian St John who all say "we" when refering to
    England... It's quite funny listening to them...
    
    Neil...
     
129.367PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCFri Apr 30 1993 12:4123
    
    
    What it comes down to is this. Some of the Irish think they are better
    than England because they beat us 5 years ago in Stuttgart. Since then
    we have been in their group in both major competitions and finished
    above them both times and gone further than them in both competions,
    but they still think they are better than us. We can except they are a
    very hard team to beat, ask any of the Countries that are in their
    group, they dont lose very often, but then again they dont win that
    often either against good teams.
    Then we get the same old rubbish about the media being bised towards
    England, very strange that, English people being biased towards the
    English....whatever next.
    As for the Scottish, well they come out with comments like "atleast we
    can accept we are crap"...very true, but the reason we dont is because we 
    like it or not we arent. "crap" teams get beat by Costa Rica and
    thrashed by Portugal.
    
    Who cares if you dont like England, keep on not liking England, our
    team is gettiung better and better, and your bitterness is going to get
    worse and worse.
    
    Dave...
129.368Staying home with Scotland??SUBURB::SWAINMFri Apr 30 1993 14:176
    Bearing in mind the fact that all of our next games are abroad to tough
    opposition, what are the chances of England qualifying for USA. 
    Comments from Scots, Irish, anyone welcome - after all we are all
    entitled to an oppinion.
    
    Matt.
129.369FORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTAFri Apr 30 1993 14:2015
>>    Re: 1 
    
>>    They are English Jocks, you can also add to that list Dennis Law,
>>    Alan Hansen Andy Gray and Ian St John who all say "we" when refering to
>>    England... It's quite funny listening to them...
    
>>    Neil...
 

They are not "English Jocks", they are British. Like the majority of BRITISH
people, though there are probably many that wouldn't admit it, they actually
support all the teams in the British Isles. Probably the only time they don't
want England to win is when they are playing Scotland.

Al
129.370Still on course...but ?PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCFri Apr 30 1993 14:2812
    
    Its not worth saying it going to be easy, because it isnt. We now need
    3 points from the next two games, 4 would be brilliant but very
    difficult. We are still in a good position despite the draw. Holland
    have played a game more, have already lost in Norway and drawn at home
    to Poland. 
    
    We've made it difficult for ourselves now, we should have won all our
    games, but we didnt, If we pick up 3 points in Poland and Norway,
    preferably beating Norway, we can still qualify. I'm not panicking...YET.
    
    Dave...
129.371BUSSTP::DREESThree good buddies were...Fri Apr 30 1993 14:3717
    
    
    Chaps...chaps...chaps....
    
    All this "we hate you 'cause you hate us" crap is getting a bit
    tiresome. Can we try and get back to some resonably, intelligent 
    noting. I enjoy most of the banter but some of the recent notes
    have been nothing more than childish.
    
    Ok....now I'm off my soapbox I have to say that I think England,
    even though 3 of their last 4 games are away, have an excellent
    chance of going to the USA. If they can perform to the same standard
    as Wednesday night the games in Norway and Poland should yield at least
    3pts from 4. As a scot thats as unbiased as I can get. 
    
    Del.
     
129.372It's going to be very tightGALVIA::SPAINThere's always the U.S.Fri Apr 30 1993 14:4730
    
    Here's how I see it.
    
    Despite only dropping 1 point (away to Holland) I still don't think
    Poland will qualify.
    
    I think 15 points are needed to qualify.
    
    England should beat San Marino away and Poland at home.  They need 2
    points from the trips to Poland and Norway - anything better and you
    can book your tickets.  They may still need a draw in Holland.  That
    will become clearer in the Autumn.
    
    I think Holland will beat Norway.  They will probably need to beat
    England as well and draw in Poland.
    
    Norway should draw with England,lose in Norway and will have more
    problems beating Poland than the other 2 nations.
    
    Holland have lost in Norway and drawn at home to Poland.  They need
    those points back.  England have drawn at home to Norway and Holland. 
    Norway have done everything that has been asked of them so far by
    beating the Dutch and drawing at Wembley.  Norway are currently in the
    strongest position but their games v England and Holland in June will
    tell a lot.
    
    It's at least 2 from 3, possibly 2 from 4.  I think it's going to be
    very tight.  It may come down to goal difference.
    
    Gary.
129.373AT least we wont have to listen to Gazza talk...DBOT07::RUSSELLFri Apr 30 1993 14:5334
    Guys,
    
    As an Irishman, I have to admit we were fortunate to scrape a draw
    against the Danes...whoops wrong note, so easy to get confused.
    
    As regards England V Holland. I like the Dutch. They are a style team.
    Bergkamp's goal was beautiful. But so was Barnes' goal. And Finally
    even the Dutch were copious in their compliments of Carlton Palmer, a
    player who's virtues I have been lauding for many years.
    
    England were unlucky to only draw. They need a bit more guile in
    defence to halt the likes of Obermaas and Bergkamp. They need a Baresi
    type figure. From midfield up they played fine. I don't see Poland
    causing them difficulty. They never have in the (recent) past, and Jan
    Tomaschevski is long gone. Norway and Holland in their home stadia are
    going to be MUCH more daunting, especially with a fit Van Baesten
    playing.
    
    It's going to be very tight. Also, IMHO, Walker should have walked for
    the penalty. Obermaas was clear in on goal. The rule is stupid, but
    consistency is needed.
    
    Can someone post the table, and the fixture list? I know England play
    away in Poland and Norway at the end of May and start of June. When is
    the game in Holland. 
    
    Good luck to England, the WC finals wouldnt be the same without them.
    After all, we'd miss listening to Jimmy Hill and The Venerable Terry,
    wouldnt we...? And we'd miss the great Carlton slagging Jimmy Hill etc
    for not backing the team. That was a great bit of telly, that was..8^)
    
    luv,
    
    Tiger
129.374PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKFri Apr 30 1993 14:5615
    
    re:.371. I couldn't agree more,
    
    Regarding the injury to Gazza it's not as serious as first thought,
    he will only be out of action for a least two weeks. So hopefully
    he will be fit for the two qualifiers at the end of the month.
    
    Looking at the table it's not going to be easy, we end up in this
    position everytime when we have to win the last game to qualify, which
    we always seem to manage to do. This time we have San Marino in the
    final fixture IF it goes to the last fixture I know which team I would
    rather be playing. To be honest I expect England to have secured a
    place to the finals by then..... 
    
    Neil.. 
129.375Grow up !!!IMAPC::MURRAYInnovation stops at I.S. !!!!Fri Apr 30 1993 17:4712
    
    Children, children.....
    
    Apart from a few exceptions I wouldn't be suprised if the average 
    mental age of most football noters was less than 10.
    
    Your crap, he's crap etc is vocabulary that most kids of primary school
    age could better.
    
    JMHO
    
    Paul
129.376UNTADH::WILCOCKSONSWFC FA CUP 93Fri Apr 30 1993 17:556
    
    
    Don't talk crap Paul!   :^)
    
    
    Al (age 7).
129.377IMAPC::MURRAYInnovation stops at I.S. !!!!Fri Apr 30 1993 17:584
    
    My daddies bigger than yours crapface
    
    Paul (age 42)
129.378PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEFri Apr 30 1993 19:4915
    
    Lets have a end to all this stupid nonsense, this topic is
    called "world cup group two".. 
    
    I dont see our great team have to much trouble brushing aside
    all the other teams in our group. England showed the other night
    that they are a world class side and any team will have to do 
    their best to beat them. 
    
    I cant understand why Des Walker didn't  kick that Dutch
    foward into row Z of the stand before he got into the box, O.K
    he would of been given the red card and missed a game but at
    least we would have won...
    
    Andy.B
129.379ahhhhh....hold your horses!DBOT07::RUSSELLFri Apr 30 1993 20:2114
    andy,
    
    hate to dosappoint you, old bean, bu this topic is called;
    	"World Cup Qualifying Group Two"
    
    By stating that its called "World Cup Group two" you are possibly in
    danger of assuming that England will, or have already, qualified for
    the Final Phase of the World Cup.
    
    Just thought I'd point it out, old fruit.
    
    Cheers,
    
    *Tiger*
129.380Foot-in-mouth-disease ???AYOV16::KMCCLELLANDThe Honest TruthFri Apr 30 1993 20:2227
    re last
    
Note 129.378              World Cup qualifying Group 2                378 of 378
PEKING::BAREFIELDA "JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE"     15 lines  30-APR-1993 15:49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    >>Lets have a end to all this stupid nonsense, this topic is
    >>called "world cup group two".. 
    
    Couldn't agree more.
    
    
    >>I cant understand why Des Walker didn't  kick that Dutch
    >>foward into row Z of the stand before he got into the box, O.K
    >>he would of been given the red card and missed a game but at
    >>least we would have won...
    
    >>Andy.B
    
    Errrr Andy.B  Can you go back and read the first line of your note and
    then ask yourself if this type of garbage/Chelsea tactics deserves to
    be called sense or nonsense........
    
    Just a thought...
    
    Kev...
    
129.381Talk sense or dont bother...PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLEFri Apr 30 1993 21:0610
     What would you prefer..
    
     A. England win 2-1 with Walker being sent off.
    
                       OR
    
     B. Just claiming 1 point.
    
     Foot in mouth, looks like you could definately get your foot in
     your mouth ... I bet!!!!
129.382Just a thought.BUSSTP::DSMITHWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRATSat May 01 1993 00:0312
    
    
    re last
    
     Personally, I would prefer option B.
    
    By the way, what's all this talk about Gazza having a sore/broken
    cheekbone. I'm sure it's all a ploy by his marketing agent to drum
    up some sympathy. After all, you would need a sledgehammer to get
    through the excess fat before connecting with any of fatties bones.
    
     Danny.
129.383PEKING::BAREFIELDAJACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLESat May 01 1993 11:492
    
    The jocks would give their right arm to have a player like Gazza...
129.384paardekopUTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funMon May 03 1993 11:0410
    <<< Note 129.383 by PEKING::BAREFIELDA "JACK CHARLTON IS DESPICABLE" >>>

    
>>    The jocks would give their right arm to have a player like Gazza...

Andy,

didn't you gave your d*ck when Gazza started playing for England :-)

T_
129.385How to write dutch names well !UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Mon May 03 1993 12:1811
    Just for the decent language in the coming notes :
    
    Wrong         Right 
    -----         -----       
    van Baesten = van Basten
    Obermaas    = Overmars ( love to hear how you pronounce that one !)
    Bergkamp    = Bergkamp
    Wouters     = Wouters ( thanks for the concern, his elbow is o.k.)
    
    Now don't let me see anyone of you make faults again in writing dutch
    names. With a little luck you don't have to write them in '94, US....
129.386Shuddupa ya face.....8^)DBOT07::RUSSELLMon May 03 1993 15:278
    re last one....
    
    Question;  How can "Wouters" be both wrong AND right??
    
    Answer;    When he commits a foul, but when other player is Gazza its
    		ok.....
    
    I notice it didnt stop Gazza talking on the "Gazzetta" on Channel 4....
129.387GVA02::LAINSBURYTop 6 by MayMon May 03 1993 17:043
    How long is Gazza out for ?
    
    Cheers
129.388FORTY2::ASHGrahame Ash @REOThu May 06 1993 17:454
Gazza's hoping to make the Lazio game on 23 May - just in time for the 
England games

g
129.389Does anybody care?GLDOA::BOSSONNEYTue May 11 1993 00:314
    What were the results of Norway-Turkey and Poland-San Marino which I
    understand were also played on April 28?
    
    Jacques
129.390PointerAIMTEC::WICKS_Aon the Streets of San FranciscoTue May 11 1993 00:361
    they're hidden at the bottom of reply .339
129.391Getting tightDBOT07::RUSSELLThu May 20 1993 14:3112
    
    Result from 19-May-93
    
    San Marino 0 - 3 Poland.
    
    This puts Poland within a point of England and Holland, with a 1 game
    advantage over the former and a two game advantage over the latter.
    
    
    cheers,
    
    *Tiger*
129.392The next two weeks can decide the group...PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu May 27 1993 16:2540
    
    
    A very important time for England in the next 5 days, it could make or
    break the qualification for USA 94.
     
    First game on Saturday in Poland (Live ITV 19:15), we always seem to
    get Poland in our group and they have been quietly picking up points
    and are right in there at the moment. It looks like Teddy Sheringham
    will make his debut alongside David Platt in attack, as Les Ferdinand
    is struggling with a back injury. Ian Wright is fit, but according to
    the papers today, GT is going to give Sheringham the nod if Ferdinand
    doesnt make it. Tony Dorigo also returns after injury at left back so 
    the team will probably read:
    
    Woods
    Dixon
    Dorigo
    Adams
    Walker
    Palmer
    Ince
    Gascoigne
    Barnes
    Platt
    Sheringham
    
    On Wednesday England travel to Norway for the second game, Norway have
    been doing very well at home and really can book there place if they
    beat England. If they lose to England, then they have to travel to
    Holland a week later, facing the fact that if they lose to the Dutch,
    they are basically out after a good start.
    
    3 Points would be a good performance, 4 would be brilliant, but
    anything less and we are struggling and relying on other teams dropping
    points. With a home game with Poland and the away fixture in San Marino
    to come for England, two wins can almost certainly qualify us but I'll
    go for a win on Poland and a draw in Norway, leaving the group still
    wide open.
    
    Dave...
129.393The Masked Man is World Class!!PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKFri May 28 1993 18:0617
    
    Tomorrow see's the start of what is an important few days for England.
    Away games against Poland and Norway if the what the papers are saying
    is true then I expect 2 wins but I will settle for 1 win and draw, this
    time next week England could almost be on there way to the states..
    
    The game is on live tomorrow so, the whole Country can assess how good
    the currant team is compared to the side that finished the fourth best
    team in the world in the last Championship.  Personally, Taylor's got a
    good team spirit within the side so I' going to stick my neck out and go
    for two England victorys. This will leave us to get one more victory in
    our last remaining games. No problem....
    
    Poland 0 England 2
    Norway 1 England 3                  
    
    Neil..
129.394one man teamPLUNDR::MORANTripple ripple truffle shufflerFri May 28 1993 18:204
    
    I'll go for a couple of 1-1 draws. Much depends on Gazza, as per usual.
    
    Tim
129.395TRUCKS::SANTThis is as good as it gets!Fri May 28 1993 18:445
    
    	Me too, though the best chance ofa win will be in Poland and we
    	may get a shock in Norway!
    
    	Andy.
129.396SUBURB::WAITEGI WON'T DO WHAT YOU TELL MEFri May 28 1993 18:517
    I think England will get a draw in Poland and will then go on and beat
    Norway 3-1.  A lot depends Gascoigne.
    
    
    
    
    Gary
129.397Good Luck from the Irish.DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD...ALL-IRELAND S.H. CHAMPIONS, 1993Fri May 28 1993 20:317
    Good Luck.
    
    It'll be no fun is the USA without you.... 
    
    8^)
    
    *Tiger*
129.398BLKPUD::WATTERSONPAll my failings exposedFri May 28 1993 20:457
    
    Tiger,
    
    remind us Ireland's brilliant performances in the 1992 European
    championship finals in Sweden...............
    
    Paul ;-)
129.399BUSSTP::DSMITHWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRATFri May 28 1993 22:418
    
    
    re last
    
    Almost as good as England's performances..
    
    Danny :-) :-)
    
129.400BHUNA::AMILLARAnd some late news just in...Sat May 29 1993 00:295
    
    I go for 3 - 1 to Poland, and 1-0 to Norway.
    
    Archie
    
129.401PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCSat May 29 1993 13:348
    
    Re.399
    
    And England's performance has striking similaraties to Ireland's
    performance in Italy, we drew all our games and then went out to the
    host nation by the odd goal.
    
    Dave...
129.402MASALA::AMILLARAnd some late news just in...Sun May 30 1993 03:285
    
    What was tonight's score?
    
    Archie
    
129.4031-1GVA05::BURKHALTERSun May 30 1993 11:597
    According to the Swiss version of 'Ceefax' it was 1-1 with
    the Poles scoring first half and Wright scoring the equaliser
    in the 84th minute....
    
    England must really now win in Norway....
    
    _dom
129.404BUSSTP::DREESSun May 30 1993 14:0112
    
    Ian Wright saved lucky England last night.
    
    Poland were strolling to victory and really should have had the points
    well rapped up before Wright equalised. Chris Woods had a string of
    fine saves and that, coupled with very poor finishing by the Polish
    centre Lesniak, kept England's hopes of qualification alive.
    
    England now really need to win in Norway. They'll go into that match
    without Paul Ince who was booked last night.
    
    Del.
129.405got out oj jailDBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD...ALL-IRELAND S.H. CHAMPIONS, 1993Mon May 31 1993 13:4018
    Thanks to good old UTV,I saw the game on saturday night. Poland should
    have been 3 up before Wright scored a brilliant goal. England deserved
    a goal due to the pressure they put the Poles under. But Really!!!
    Those misses in the first minute of the game and in the second half!!!
    What Can you say...honestly England were dead jammy to get that point.
    
    Wrights goal reminded me of Lineker's first ( I Think) against Poland
    in WC96 against Poland also. Fantastic opportunist shot.
    
    I would hate to be that Polish striker who missed those two sitters!!!
    The Poles were technically brilliant and regularly carved the Englsih
    midfield and defence wide open. It was a rough game, with some vicious
    tackling on both sides.
    
    Is the Norway game live on ITV also??? Hope so. Its great to give the
    thumbs down to SKY!!!
    
    *Tiger* 
129.406Norway should watch outESSB::BREEMon May 31 1993 15:349
    I heard the second half is on live on BBC.
    
    England will have to consider that a point gained as they could well
    have lost 3-0.
    
    Having said that Norway could feel a backlash on Wednesday and
    shouldn't be too complacent.
    
    Paul
129.407Go for it, Norway!KIRKTN::AMILLARAnd some late news just in...Tue Jun 01 1993 01:028
    
    It may also mean that Norway will lift their game, knowing now that
    England are beatable.
    
    Norway to win 1-0
    
    Archie
    
129.408Point gained from a sh*t performance...PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Jun 01 1993 12:4119
    
    
    No doubt about it we were lucky. We didnt play well at all, and it has
    to go down as a point gained. Poland had two clear chances, the one in
    the first minute was a terrible miss, and Chris Woods made up for his
    error by making a good save after he decided to pass to the Polish
    foward from a back pass.
    
    I think its about time Des Walker got "rested". He needs to get his
    form back together again, he is making to many mistakes now.
    
    Great goal from Wright......lets hope thats the first of many for
    England, starting on Wednesday.
    
    We will need to play much better than that against Norway, lets face it
    we really need a win now. A draw is'nt the end of the world but it would
    mean us relying on other teams dropping points. 
    
    Dave... 
129.409Norwege zwei point????ESSB::BREETue Jun 01 1993 13:3810
    I don't think a draw would be too bad. After all you haven't lost a
    game yet, you've put 6 past one team and it doesn't matter whether
    you come out first or second, does it?
    
    I think England will definitely qualify though possibly not as group
    winners. This is good because the World Cup wouldn't be the same
    without you :-) :-)and especially Jimmy Hill!!!
    
    Paul
    
129.410TRUCKS::SANTThis is as good as it gets!Tue Jun 01 1993 13:5622
    
    	A draw in Oslo will be Ok. Not brilliant, but not a disaster
    	either. A win will put us in the driving seat in this group.
    
    	How we got a point in Poland is still a mystery, as was the total
    	inability of the Swiss referee to adequately punish some awful
    	challenges.
    	
    	Wright's goal was superb. The pub went wild 8-)
    	
    	Barnes is a numpty and should be dropped forever. Walker has now
    	been "average" for half a season - according to Sampdoria and what
    	I've seen of him - and maybe it's time for a change. Pallister gets
    	my vote. Keep Bardsley and Dorrigo in. Shoot Palmer for being a
    	prat, and Ince for being a cretin and getting booked.
    
    	Team for Norway game:
    
    	Woods, Bardsley, Dorrigo, Batty, Pallister, Adams, Sharpe, Platt,
    	Ferdinand, Wright, Gascoigne.
    	
    	Andy.
129.411You'll never beat Des Walker...???????????????PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Jun 01 1993 14:2318
    
    Andy..
    
    The problem with playing Pallister with Adams is the lack of pace, if
    we get with our two full backs to far up field, we might get exposed,
    although Adams looks pretty secure nowdays ( err I cant believe I said
    that), you need some pace. I would play Keown with Adams, he has some
    pace, and is also a good man marker.
    
    What about Teddy...?, he did ok and deserves another chance. I would
    agree about Barnes, time has surely run out now, lets see Lee Sharpe
    have a run, atleast he might get some crosses over to give Teddy
    Sheringham (if he plays) some chance. He wasnt given any service on
    Saturday.
    
    I hope all this about Taylor dropping Gascoigne is just a smokescreen..
    
    Dave...
129.412TRUCKS::SANTThis is as good as it gets!Tue Jun 01 1993 14:3011
    
    	Fair comment Dave. It simply came down to the fact that Wright
    	scored in 20 minutes and Sherringham didn't in 90, but he did
    	do enough to suggest that he can handle international football.
    	I'd have him on the bench with Clough.
    
    	I think Taylor will stick with Sherringham too, with Wright still
    	on the bench, but it's just the side that I'd play at the moment.
    
    	Andy.
             
129.413If we're making changes...UNTADH::WILCOCKSONBack in SchlagrahmlandTue Jun 01 1993 18:507
    
    I didn't see the game (I wuz on holiday), but I read a few back that 
    Woods made a bad mistake. He seems to make silly mistakes a bit too
    often for my liking (I'm an Owls fan!). I think Seaman looks more
    secure, but not as flashy, so I'd play Seaman in goal.
    
    Al.
129.414Can't kick for toffeeYUPPY::PATEMANScuba Dive in my Think TankTue Jun 01 1993 19:467
    Ref Woods
    
    My main criticism of him is that he has not adapted at all well to the
    back pass rule. In comparison to Seaman and Martyn he is very poor at
    kicking clear.
    
    Paul
129.415FORTY2::FOWLERMTue Jun 01 1993 19:4620
The best thing about Saturday's fiasco was seeing Taylor in a strop at half time.
8-) 8-)

Surely he must understand Barnes = Crap. It's a simple equation, and one which 
the rest of the galaxy seems fairly at ease with.

I thought Bardsley was okay at attacking but he didn't appear to do a fat lot
in the way of actual defense. 

Des Walker also needs a rest but I don't think we have got anyone to take his 
place. Pallister is rubbish. Get Des back in English football and he'll be
back to his true form within months. He has just had a hard time getting used 
to lower quality continental football. 8-) (flying in the face of reality)

Hows about:

Woods, Adams, Walker, Dorigo, Bardsley, Palmer, Gascoigne, Platt, Sharpe, Wright,
Sherringham/Ferdinand

Mike
129.416Look again..!!OPG::TONYTue Jun 01 1993 20:0113
Re. 415
>Des Walker also needs a rest but I don't think we have got anyone to take his 
>place. Pallister is rubbish. Get Des back in English football and he'll be
>back to his true form within months. He has just had a hard time getting used 
>to lower quality continental football. 8-) (flying in the face of reality)


Mike,
 Pallister was ever-present in the United side this season in total of 50
games United conceeded 35 goals..I wouldn't call that rubbish..and I don't
mind him not  being in the England team..

Tony
129.417Have Norway the "bottle"??SUBURB::ONEILLSTue Jun 01 1993 22:279
    Enforced changes could actually work in Graham Taylor's changes as they
    did in the past.  I think England are strongest upfront where they have
    several class strikers/attacking midfielders.  Wright, Ferdinand, or 
    Sheringham with Sharpe on  the left and Platt in midfield would probably 
    strengthen the side.  Mark Hateley isn't even in the squad.
    
    Great goal from "shoot on sight" Ian Wright.  
    
    Shane
129.418and why did they sign all of them?AIMTEC::WICKS_AAlphatraz - Coming Summer 93Tue Jun 01 1993 22:558
    assuming that this is in one of the English newspapers...
    
    how many of the hundreds of Norwegians signed by English clubs this
    past season are in the Norwegian team for tomorrow's game.
                  
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.419a draw would be a very good resultGALVIA::SPAINThere's always the U.S.Tue Jun 01 1993 23:0516
    
    I think the fans are over reacting.  A draw is Poland was a very good
    result.  I can't see Norway or Holland having it easy over there.  I
    think they've lost one home World Cup match..ever.
    
    A draw in Norway would also be a very good result.
    
    If England draw in Norway,win v Poland and San Marino and draw with
    Holland they can only fail on goal difference and that's with just
    about every result going against them.
    
    A win in Norway would make things pretty easy.  A defeat would really
    put the cat among the pigeons.  I think it'll be a draw and England will
    qualify.
    
    Gary.
129.420TRUCKS::SANTThis is as good as it gets!Wed Jun 02 1993 13:099
    
    	Exactly, Gary.....this obsession with expecting England to win
    	every game home and away is ridiculous. We haven't been beaten
    	yet. We'll be there provided it stays that way.
    
    	Andy.
    
    
             
129.421CLOUGHS THE MAN (Jnr)MACNAS::SMORANWed Jun 02 1993 14:198
    What about giving Clough a chance. When he came on the last time he put
    more passes together than the whole team did in the game. He may not 
    stand out as a Brill player but his incisive passes could swing a game.
    
    England to draw and hopefully qualify - GOOD LUCK TO BOTH TEAMS
    
    Stephen
    
129.422Who, What, Where, When?????SHIPS::DURANT_SWed Jun 02 1993 17:2927
    
    I know Sky Sports coverage of the game starts at 18.00 but is the game
    being shown live on any other channels and when is the kick off ?
    
    Taylor is apparently considering loads of options for tonights game. Is
    it:
    
    		Dixon or Bardsley ?
    		Walker or Keown or Pallister ?
    		Gascoigne or Clough ?
    		Barnes or Sharpe ?
    		To replace Ince is it to be Batty or Platt moved back to
    								midfield ?
    		Are Sheringham and Platt going to stay as the front two
    		or are Ferdinand or Wright going to get a game ?
    
    In my opinion tonight is not the time to make sweeping changes. My 
    team would be:
    
    Woods, Dixon, Dorigo, Walker, Adams, Palmer, Platt, Gascoigne (replaced 
    later by Clough), Ferdinand, Wright, Barnes.
    
    There is the USA tournament coming up to give Keown, Clough,
    Sheringham, and Sharpe their chances. 
    
    			Steve. 
		
129.4232nd halfWOTVAX::MACDONALDIStalybridge CelticWed Jun 02 1993 17:389
    
    re - 1 
    "are any other channels showing the England game tonight"
    
    BBC1 are showing the highlights of the first half followed by live
    second half action.
    
    
    mac
129.424SUBURB::ABSOLOMTFour days &amp; countingWed Jun 02 1993 17:394
    Yeh, when is the kick-off?
    
    Tony
    
129.425on the box...DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD...ALL-IRELAND S.H. CHAMPIONS, 1993Wed Jun 02 1993 17:384
    and I believe the coverage starts on BBC1 at 19:45 and will finish at
    21:00.
    
    *Tiger*
129.426Please sneak a win England...PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Jun 02 1993 17:4217
    
    
    I cant believe Taylor is seriously considering dropping Paul Gascoigne,
    Gazza didnt play very well on Saturday (he wasnt helped by getting
    fouled every time he got the ball), but he is still more than capable
    of turning the game our way. If Taylor wants to change things he should
    drop Barnes, and give Lee Sharpe a game.
    
    I'll be suprised if there are to many changes, just Batty for Ince which 
    is enforced, and Ferdinand for Sheringham, if he's fit, with Wright on 
    the bench again, as he is still struggling with the ankle apparently.
    
    I would be suprised to see another draw.
    
    Dave...
    
     
129.427Too much Dog and Mars bars.PLUNDR::MORANTripple ripple truffle shufflerWed Jun 02 1993 18:227
    
    >I cant believe Taylor is seriously considering dropping Paul Gascoigne
    
    It's been reported that Gascoigne has a drinking and eating problem
    (not unlike myself, no doubt) and this is affecting his general fitness
    levels (still not unlike myself). This is the reason for the talk of
    Gazza being dropped.
129.428He's got to get his appetite back!!SUBURB::SWAINMWed Jun 02 1993 18:358
    I think it's a ploy to get him psyched up for the match.  He seems to
    have lost his lust for getting the ball.  When he was wound up he used
    to produce much better football and get more yellow cards of course.
    He still has an eating drinking problem though!!
    
    Matt.
    
    
129.429The winning team ?OSL09::BJARNEBjarne Mehl @NWOWed Jun 02 1993 18:5621
129.4307pm KICK OFFMACNAS::SMORANWed Jun 02 1993 19:231
    
129.431Where did all the others go?AIMTEC::WICKS_AJune 7-13 Real Football in the U.SWed Jun 02 1993 21:2410
    Bjarne, (.428)
    
    thanks I was reading an old copy of When Saturday Comes over the
    weekend and it listed 9 Norwegian players who had been transferred
    to English league clubs so I was surprised to see so few of them
    in the team...
    
    regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.432BUSSTP::DREESThu Jun 03 1993 00:5110
    
    Final result from Oslo....
    
    Norway 2 England 0
    
    Looking forward to the comments from Messers Cossey & Barefield !!
    
    :=)
    
    Del.
129.433Not much point in them coming next week now (:==:)AIMTEC::WICKS_AJune 7-13 Real Football in the U.SThu Jun 03 1993 01:256
    Is this true? - my it's going to be boring next Summer without England
    and Scotland!
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.434Result Anyone? No wind ups pleaseNEWOA::GUTHRIE_JPanic SleeperThu Jun 03 1993 01:364
    Anyone be kind enough to enter the full time result.
    
    
    Jason...on night shift with no radio/tv.
129.435Norway going to U.S.ZPOVC::KUMARThu Jun 03 1993 05:3317
    Yep, it's true.
    
    No wind ups
    
    Final Result:
    
    	Norway	2  :   England  0 (Straight off BBC World Service Sports
    				   Round up at 22:45 hrs GMT)
    
    So, it looks like no Scotland,England or N. Ireland in U.S. And it
    leaves Wales with the arduous task of ensuring that the U.K. is
    represented. I think they'll make it.
    Will Taylor be sacked, NOW ?
    
    Regards,
    
    Kumar
129.436How about Norway v Portugal in the WC final?AIMTEC::WICKS_AJune 7-13 Real Football in the U.SThu Jun 03 1993 07:4427
    Kumar,
    
    thanks for the 'official' confirmation. I don't honestly think England are
    out of it yet take a look at the remaining fixtures Poland have to play
    Norway twice and there's still a lot of games between the top 4 sides
    left.
    
    I rang my mum and she knew this score but you beat me to it - she
    didn't know the more important score of RCS v Rumania (I thought Mum's
    were supposed to know everything?)
    
    On an interesting side note my June edition of WSC (When Saturday
    Comes) was in my mailbox when I got home and it contains an article
    about the Norwegian commentator called Bjorge Lillelien who gained fame
    after Norway beat England in Oslo in September 1981 with his speech
    of "Mrs Thatcher, Winston Churchill, Charlie Chaplin, Derek Batey,
    Amanda de Cadenet, your boys took one hell of a beating...."
    
    Don't suppose he was commentating tonight if so what did he say?
    
    Forget Graham Taylor, it's John major and the tory government who
    should resign (:==:)
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.wicks
                                         
129.437english sport is dead,dead,dead.SNOC02::CRAVENPAULThu Jun 03 1993 08:384
    Yes Andrew, Resign Taylor, Resign Major and above all Resign Graham
    Gooch!!. Can anyone tell me was it a case of poor English play or have
    Norway improved that much since Gazza gave them that encouragement last
    year.   Ica.
129.438Sunderland,Sunderland,Sunderland.SNOC02::CRAVENPAULThu Jun 03 1993 08:413
    Oh, and I know this is the wrong conference but can any of you poms
    around Manchester give me the latest weather forecast for the test
    starting today. Thanks,Ica.
129.439Wooooops...GVA05::BURKHALTERThu Jun 03 1993 11:458
    oh ohhh....
    
    I'm not going to put on any money on England going to the US next
    year....did we deserve to lose?
    
    At least Taylor might be given the push now, with a bit of luck!
    
    -Dom
129.440I just don't want to talk about it!!PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKThu Jun 03 1993 11:5616
    
    Well the most pathetic display I've seen from England for Years, Norway
    though not a good side tore England apart. I just can't belive how
    awful England were, they can still qualify so at least they are not 
    out of it yet, they need to win all there remaining games and hope Holland
    and Poland drop points along the way. Graham Taylor has to take the
    blame, his team selection was a little strange to say the least the
    team just didn't look as if they knew what they were supposed to be
    doing. Des Walker, what has happened!, the man who England have 
    depended on over the years has lost all confidence his moaning and
    wingeing cost England the first goal.
    
    Disapointed, gutted and pissed off....
    
    Neil...
     
129.441Deja Vu......GYMAC::DCASSIDYThu Jun 03 1993 12:3210
    
    Please read my note 129.289 on their match against TURKEY  and tell me 
    if I'm very surprised. A few chances went their way but this time
    nothing. Lets face it...Norway have quite enjoyably surprised us. It
    was like watching the Danes last summer..devil may care
    attitude...which at least made the match somewhat enjoyable to watch.
    
    Regards,
    
    Dezzz. 
129.442SHIT..!PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Jun 03 1993 12:3911
    
    This has to be the worst England performance I have seen for years,
    they were completley clueless. How can a team that outplayed Norway at
    Wembley last year be so bad last night ???, the manager's got to take
    the blame imo, where was Lee Dixon playing, right side of midfield ?, he
    cant pass the ball to another England player, Lee Sharpe at left back
    ???????.
    
    Three wins needed now, I cant see it. We are almost certainly out imo.
    
    Dave... 
129.443Taylor has to GO !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Thu Jun 03 1993 13:1535
129.444USA - here we come (70% chance) !!OSL09::BJARNEBjarne Mehl @NWOThu Jun 03 1993 13:2359
129.445AYOV16::KMCCLELLANDThe Honest TruthThu Jun 03 1993 13:308
    re last
    
    Sorry Bjarne but you did not beat the "Brits", you beat the English
    and there is a world of difference in that.
    
    Just ask the Oslo police.
    
    Kev......
129.446back to the drawing roomESSB::BREEThu Jun 03 1993 13:3924
    If England had Jack Charlton as manager they would have won a WC or EC
    by now.
    
    Charlton does not give care about the press or the public. Under
    Charlton Des Walker wouldn't be mouthing at the ref. over a free, Gazza
    would not be splashed across the papers crying his eyes out after
    losing a semi final, he would have got a kick up the arse and told to
    get on with it, he would't be allowed play with a silly plastic mask to
    protect his face.
    
    All in all the English team would cease to become a media item and get
    back to basics.
    
    
    but .....
    
    
    ......he's not in charge....
    
    
    ...and you're not likely to be in the U.S.....
    
    
    Paul 
129.447Do you sing "Rule Britannia" in Scotland ?OSL09::BJARNEBjarne Mehl @NWOThu Jun 03 1993 13:4416
    Re .445
    
    Ahhhh... sorry about my "glip", I was thinking about "Asterix in
    Britannia", well - we beat almost the whole world yesterday, didn't 
    we ?
    
    And the Oslo police did a good job yesterday, keeping the English
    supporters in the Stadium an hours or so after the end of the match.
    The problem was that some of them missed their train for Copenhagen...
    On tuesday the police may have been  a little provocative, I don't know, 
    but a local paper has this opinion.
    
    Sorry again for my geographic mistake (why did they sing "Rule
    Britannia" - a while ?).
    
    Bjarne
129.448SUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupThu Jun 03 1993 13:4225
129.449At least England don't need to qualify for the '96 Euro Championships!!!FORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTAThu Jun 03 1993 13:5167
>    I'm sure the American Police force were delighted with that result as
>    well, It almost completly rules out any soccer violence at U.S.A '94.

Rubbish.. The Germans and probably the Dutch will be there!!! (followed by a
couple of half hearted smiley's)

Last night was total drivel. I've seen more competent performances by my 3
year old daughter in the garden. England do not deserve to go to the US after
that performance.

Woods:	He is getting worse by the game. Why was he off balance for the 1st goal,
before the striker touched the ball, and no world class keeper would allow a shot
straight at him go in.

Dixon:	No ideas. Got caught out of position for the 2nd goal.

Pallister: Solid

Palmer: Kept thinking he was Norwegian. Kept passing to them!!!

Walker:	As Neil said, his confidence is shot to pieces. OK so the free kick
incedent didn't look like a foul, but you never let the attacker get goal side.
Caught in no man's land for the second. Where has his speed gone?? His
international career is surely over as long as he satys in Italy.

Adams: Solid

Platt:	He didn't have a good game, but he battled, as ever. Could have scored
in a similar move to the goal he scored v Belgium in '90, but the ball was too
far ahead.

Gascoigne: Was he playing???

Ferdinand: Quiet 1st half, didn't get the supply he requires. Should have scored
from Lee Sharpe's only decent cross, but mis-cued. Had a good break-away,
showed his pace, but Thorsvedt saved well.

Sheringham: Like Ferdinand but came off at half time

Sharpe: Didn't get the ball in the right positions to be a threat. The only time
he did Ferdinand missed cued.

Wright:	Didn't get enough of the ball

Clough: Should have stayed on the bench!!!

Norway: Confident, and made England look like they'd struggle in the Reading
Sunday league. They're not world beaters by any means, but they play as a unit
and are very difficult to break down. Unless they self-destruct, they could do
very well next year.

Taylor should go now. I'm sure it's him that's the problem. The players need a
manager they respect and want to win for, and I can't see anyone respecting
Taylor. Sure, he was a good league manager, but he's proved that he doesn't have
a clue at international level. Fresh blood in charge is needed if England are 
going to win all their remaining games. They have the talent on the field without
a doubt, but they need a manager to get the best out of them.

Glenn Hoddle, England's Player/manager. Sounds good to me  :-)

Failing that, give Cloughy a call. Give him a couple of months and see if there
isn't an improvement.

Al

P.S. That Norwegian commentator died a couple of years ago. He would have loved
it last night.
129.450What a Pleb!DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Thu Jun 03 1993 14:1955
    I have never, in memory, seen an England team so outclassed and
    outfought. The Norwegians were technically, tactically and physically
    superb. They supported each other time and again to carve open England
    and could have scored 6 if they really wanted.
    
    I'm sorry for all the English noters here. At times in the past, you
    rode your luck ( eg V Poland last saturday), but luck comes to those
    teams who deserve it. Unfortunately, chickens will always come home to
    roost. The WC wont be the same without England. Like most Irishmen, I
    have a love/hate relationship when I see the England team. I love the
    style they are capable of, and the fact that are culturally and
    geographically close to us in Ireland. I hate the superior attitude
    that still emenates from the English media, just because England won a
    World Cup in 27 years ago.
    
    You'll be missed in US '94. Maybe Wales can join us there, I dont
    know???
    
    Finally, Graham Taylor should be given a boot in the arse by his
    players. He came on the box last night, and immediately said "I feel
    sick about this, as sick as Joe Public back in teh UK"...this clver
    device put Graham at one with Joe Public against the supposed real
    brigands, his players. Taylor was trying to push the blame onto his
    players in public..."I share the responsibility for what happened"
    
    Taylor , you shouldnt say things like that in public if you want to
    have the faith and loyalty of your players. You should say .." I'm the
    manager, I picked the team. We played badly. I accept responsibility.
    We will jsut have to come back and try again in our last three games".
    You should ***NEVER*** berate or belittle your players in public. They
    are humiliated enough. Take them to one side in the next few days,
    individually, and tell them what you thought of their performance, and
    what you want of them in the future. Instill pride in the wearing of
    the White and Blue. Take away the fear factor.
    
    Taylor , you are a lousy manager and a bad human being for the way you
    treat your players. Myself, even as an ordinary father to younng kids,
    know that you ***NEVER*** humiliate your kids in public , no matter how
    bad they've been. You ****NEVER***strip  them of their dignity in front
    of others. You take them to a quiet place, and have your arguement
    there, not in front of their friends and other adults. That way, you
    point out what they've done wrong, allow them to repent in dignity.
    
    Taylor, those that take away the integrity of my character do immeasureable
    damage to me. This is how your players feel this morning.
    
    Taylor, you inherited a great team that had made it to a World Cup
    Semi-Final in 1990. Look what you have done.
    
    Taylor, go.
    
    To all the sickened English supportere here today, I wish you hope to
    lighten your burden, and I wish you a new manager.
    
    *Tiger*
129.451Taylor has to go.IRNBRU::BARLOWThu Jun 03 1993 14:3327
    If England win all three of their remaining matches then they will
    probably qualify.  But who wants to see England scrape in by the skin
    of their teeth only to get thrashed in the WC ?  Wouldn't it be
    better in the long run if they did not qualify, Taylor gets the sack
    and then maybe we can for once qualify for a tournament without scaping
    in.  If we do qualify we'll never get rid of Taylor.  After seeing the game
     against Holland I thought we were finally getting somewhere, but after
    the games against Poland and Norway..??? The whole point of Qualifying
    for the WC is to try to win.  Can one person honestly tell me they
    think England can win with a team like that ?  
     I agree with .446.  If we had Jack Charlton I think things would be a
    lot better.  Taylor worries too much about who to play and individual
    performances, and I think certain players think that they make the
    team.  Maybe now with their backs against the wall they can play
    better.  Maybe now they realise that if they want to play in the world cup,
    then they had better fight for it.  Teams like Norway and Switzerland
    are heading the group tables because they play for a team, a unit and
    they are really focused.  
      England play Poland at home and San Marino and Holland away.  The way
    I see it there's no point in saying if they win this,then if they could
    perhaps.......basically if they don't get their act together,their
    confidence back and start to win games with a good performance, then let
    alone the rest of their WC qualifying mattches, the USA is gonna thrash
    us!
    
    Will.  ( Really P*ssed off)
        
129.452Taylor out...Venables in.PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Jun 03 1993 14:3516
    
    I think the time has come for the FA to sack Graham Taylor if he wont
    do the honorable thing and resign. Any manager that sends a team out to
    play like they played last night, obviously isnt fit to manage an
    International side. The England team is capable of much, much better
    than they showed last night, we know that, but we wont qualify for the
    World Cup now, and that is a disaster.
    
    Its the perfect oppertunity to end the Tottenham saga now, before the
    game and THFC get dragged through the sh*t next week in the courts, (as
    it wont just be THFC that is going to be in the dock), and get Terry
    Venables in the England job. Taylor should be sacked, and Terry
    Venables should be offered the job.
    
    Dave...still totally p*ssed off with last night farce.
    
129.453PLUNDR::MORANTripple ripple truffle shufflerThu Jun 03 1993 14:3819
    
    We're not out yet. Admittedly, we are a very poor side at the moment
    and it's going to take a tremendous turn-around to get this team
    playing football. However, it's not impossible and I still think we can
    qualify. If Norway take 2 points from Holland next week (and this is
    possible) and we get a draw there (or a win) and then win our remaining 
    games against Poland (home) and San Marino (away), I think we'll
    qualify -- it's not too tall an order. However, it's obvious that we
    need a big change in personel to reverse our fortunes. I think Glenn
    Hoddle should be given the manager's job and the likes of Carlton
    Palmer, Lee Dixon, Des Walker, David Platt and Gascoigne removed from
    the team (if only till they discover their form -- although Palmer and
    Dixon should be banned for good).
    
    Still, if England don't make it, then we still will be able to cheer the
    Irish on in '94 (at least probably).
    
    Tim
               
129.454They WON'T be missed.BUSSTP::DSMITHWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRATThu Jun 03 1993 14:3821
    
    
     Why won't the world cup be the same without England? Why will they 
    be missed if they don't qualify? 
    
     I cannot understand why people seem to think the above. If they 
    don't qualify (and I still think they will) then they don't deserve
    to be there. I'm sure the supporters of Norway and Holland won't be
    upset if England don't qualify. I certainly won't miss them in USA.
    It means the television coverage in Britain might for once be un-biased 
    and will concentrate on all the teams taking part.
    
     England have been living off memories of 1966 and more recently the
    semi-finals in 1990. The press then made out that England were
    potential world champions, they seem to forget that England were very
    lucky to reach them semis in Italy, getting fortunate results against
    Belgium and the Cameroon. Now that they've had a couple of bad results,
    the press and supporters turn against them. As previous notes have
    said, your luck ran out this time.
    
     Danny.
129.455YUPPY::PANESWin your weight in fishThu Jun 03 1993 14:5337
     <<< Note 129.454 by BUSSTP::DSMITH "WORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRAT" >>>
                           -< They WON'T be missed. >-

    
    
    
    
>     England have been living off memories of 1966 and more recently the
>    semi-finals in 1990. The press then made out that England were
>    potential world champions, they seem to forget that England were very
>    lucky to reach them semis in Italy, getting fortunate results against
>    Belgium and the Cameroon. Now that they've had a couple of bad results,
>    the press and supporters turn against them. As previous notes have
>    said, your luck ran out this time.
    
>     Danny.



Danny,

Please don't blame the genuine football supporter ( who happens to be English )
for the crass arrogance of the tabloids. 

As to the game .... well England were piss-poor. I had to laugh at Trevor "
whipping in crosses" Brooking, when he said that Norway were an average team.
If that is the case that what are England? Norway looked very dangerous going
forward, but their defence remained untested ( but that could be that they
didn't allow England to attack them or because England were so inept).



Oh well its only a game, and I am not totally surprised given my luck this
season. The Palace were relegated, Moan United won the P.L, the Arzzz won 
both cups and the bloody Tories are still in power.

Stuart 
129.456Hoddlee my arse !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Thu Jun 03 1993 15:0416
    
    This adoration of  Glenn Hoddle is going a bit far.
    O.K the guy got Swindon promoted, but they are a team of kickers.
    This form of drooling over Hoddle seems a common disease amongst
    English supporters. He was *never* a brilliant player and is not
    experienced enough to be a good international manager. Media hype once
    again decieves the English public.
    
    Give the job to Ron Atkinson or El Tel (Both untainted by the F.A
    school of excelence) and solve the problems of nation.
    
    By the way, you should sack every English commentator (appart from El
    Tel) along with Taylor. They are as pathetic as he is.
    
    An Impartial Celt.
                                        
129.457Its only a game. Isn't it?IOSG::PARKERJim ParkerThu Jun 03 1993 15:0530
    
    	As someone who has a lot more experience of World Cup footbal than 
    the average man can I just say it was better it happened now rather 
    than England qualifying and getting to the States. 
    
    	In the States you would only come up against the likes of Costa 
    Rica, Iran or Peru and get seriously stuffed - take it from me I know. 
    I have suffered even more than you silent English noters.
    
    	As to the previous notes I take exception to those who say Norway 
    aren't a good team. Are you simply repeating Trevor Brooking's 
    comments, he thought Poland were a good team! Norway played an updated 
    version of British football and played it well (maybe because the 
    England squad didn't have a clue). 
    
    	To the noter who objected to Bjarne saying "British", well they 
    would have stuffed Scotland with that performance - wouldn't they.
    
    	Managers? This time you might be lucky, the obvious replacement has 
    just led his team to relegation so the FA won't have the bottle to 
    choose Coppell. Will they? 
    
    	Traditionally the FA choose their managers by how well they wear a 
    blazer and tie and they deliberately exclude anyone with any sign of 
    genius, style or awkward opinions. I reckon they should go for a 
    foreigner with a good solid down to earth approach to the game. I don't 
    think Liverpool will stand in his way! Please before the SFA offer him 
    a job.
    
    
129.458not sorry that i missed itSWBNEU::TOURNE::WRIGHTThu Jun 03 1993 15:1510
sounds like another night of national humiliation by proxy - i'm glad i couldn't
find coverage of it on tv now ..

one interesting point is that (at least here in Switzerland) it isn't being 
reported as a "shock" result - perhaps other people have a more realistic idea
of our current standing as a footballing nation than we (the english) do. Perhaps
its because their perspective isn't distorted by the (almost unavoidable) bias
you bring to supporting your own club or country

   ray
129.459You mus die..FORTY2::FOWLERMThu Jun 03 1993 15:2126
re: -2

Glen Hoddle never a brilliant player?

Aaargghhh!

heresy, sacrilege, treason.

What planet are you living on?

Send me your address and I'll post you the Tribute to Glen Hoddle video.

What's more, Swindon are not a team of kickers, and never have been. Not only 
do they play attractive passing football (witness Monday's first division 
playoff epic) but, and no disrespect intended, they are crap: it's only Lord
Glenn's rampant genius that has got them into the Premier League.

Oh, I can hardly type, I'm so angry.

Would that we still had the death penalty, oh ye of little footballing brain.

I'm going to calm down.

Mike

PS: Glenn Hoddle for England Manager=World Cup 98 Winners
129.460Steve rants...ECCGY4::HAIGHExperientia does itThu Jun 03 1993 15:2122
    England were NOT fortunate against Belgium in 1990, they were against
    the Cameroons and they were unfortunate against Germany.
    
    Anyway back to real issue, last night;
    
    If you think Norway are an average team you are either wrong or you don't
    understand football (probably the latter, seeing as many people thought
    England would win both the last two games.) WAKE UP! Norway are a good
    team, England last night were SH*TE. They were lucky to only get beat
    by 2, 4 or 5 would not have been unfair.
    
    The players were being asked to play in positions they don't normally
    play in. Gascoigne played superbly for Lazio a few weeks ago, he only
    plays crap for England because he doesn't have the same quality of
    players/manager etc, around him that he has in Italy. 
    
    Taylor was honest after the game last night, however he should take the
    blame more than his players, and honesty does not win matches. Get rid
    off him, quickly. Get someone with flair in (NOT Jack Chralton), either
    Francis will do, or Ardilles??? Can you imagine the Fashist gutter
    press reaction if we picked a none English manager? Especially a
    'shock-horror' Argentinian. 
129.461TRUCKS::SANTThis is as good as it gets!Thu Jun 03 1993 15:237
    
    	Good note, Steve. Quite right.
    
    	Let's face it, we've been due one of those performances for
    	a while now.
    
    	Andy.
129.462PLUNDR::MORANTripple ripple truffle shufflerThu Jun 03 1993 15:3011
    
    >What's more, Swindon are not a team of kickers, and never have been.
    
    Oh yes they are (at least on occasions). I'm sure Portsmouth and other
    Newcastle fans will testify to this. However, they can play football and
    there's nothing wrong with a bit of bite to a team -- something England
    lacked in abundance last night. Hoddle would not be worse than Taylor
    (whose clubs sides were all unatractive and in the main, ineffective
    too).                       
    
    Tim
129.463TRUCKS::SANTThis is as good as it gets!Thu Jun 03 1993 15:4423
	England were awful last night, but so what. We were lucky to
	only lose 2-0 - it could have been *much* worse...

	All you non-English noters, please don't assume we're all as
	bad as the English media. I would like to think that some of
	us are more realistic.

	It's not all up for England's campaign to qualify but it may
	as well be. If we *do* qualify then things will never change
	as they surely need to. It won't do us any harm to fail every 
	now and again - it's called winning and losing, we all have 
	to learn to accept both. 

	No wonder the Irish and Scots love to see us English munching 
	on humble pie! As a nation, we make such bad losers.

	There are lots of excuses that could be offered for England's
	performance last night, but who's to say it would have been
	any different? Norway deserve this result and it would be 
	wrong to assume they got it because of England's failings.

	Andy.
129.464Well done NorwayGALVIA::SPAINTaylor must STAYThu Jun 03 1993 16:1224
    
    I'd be lying if I said I wasn't happy with last night.  It wasn't a
    lucky win either nor was it a fluke.  Indeed had Norway not indulged
    themselves Jim Baxter style it could have been 4.
    
    Norway should qualify now.  A result in Holland next Wednesday would
    virtually guarantee that they do.
    
    England will battle it out for second place with Holland and Poland. 
    Taylor will be praying that Holland don't beat Norway to go second.  If
    so England may need to win in Holland.  If Holland draw at hoem to
    Norway and England they'll have to win in Poland to catch England on
    goal difference.  There are a lot of permutations and combinations.
    England are not out yet but they'll need to turn in performances like
    last April instead of last night.
    
    Norway have been very impressive in this group already - beating
    Holland,drawing at Wembley.  They deserve to qualify.  Holland have not
    impressed but they'll be a better side if they reach the finals and
    have Cruijff as manager.
    
    Poland could still make it too.
    
    Gary.
129.465Keegan for managerWELCLU::BROWNIThe Man who sold the WorldThu Jun 03 1993 16:509
    One man for manager that no-one seems to have mentioned yet. 
    
    Kevin Keegan. He did a tremendous job with Newcastle last season, he
    was a great player/captain for England.
    
    Either him, or Big Ron. At least he LOOKS the part (overcoat, flashy
    watches, gold bracelets, etc.)
    
    Ian
129.466AYOV16::KMCCLELLANDThe Honest TruthThu Jun 03 1993 17:0220
    
    re. 457
    
    Jim,
    I was the noter who objected to Bjarne saying "British" and I did it
    on a point of principle. I am sick to the back teeth of this type of
    selective amnesia when the English media are involved. When fans go
    on the rampage they are "British". When England win, they are English.
    
    Bjarne made a genuine mistake and I genuinely pointed it out to him so
    that he would realise there is a difference between the two. Was I
    wrong ? Did Norway really beat Britain last night ?
    
    As for Norway beating Scotland on that performance last night. 
    
    SO WHAT ?  Does this really mean anything ?? Don't stir up an argument
    that isn't there.
    
    
    Kev...
129.467UNTADH::WILCOCKSONBack in SchlagrahmlandThu Jun 03 1993 17:1016
    >> As previous notes have said, your luck ran out this time.
    
    Yup, I have to agree. I'm an England fan, but I hate all this pre-match
    shite we have to read in here (and in the UK press) from people who seem
    to be watching a different England team to the rest of the world.
    England have had A LOT of luck, every time I see them I am suprised if/when 
    they win. The only time in living memory I've seen them and been proud
    of the performance was the semi-final in 1990. I'm not suprised that their 
    luck ran out in Norway (no disrespect to the Norway team intended). 
    Big Jack once applied for the job as England manager, but he never got
    a reply - so he decided never to manage them. I'd laugh my socks off if
    they offered him the job now and he turned it down (which I reckon he 
    would).
    
    Al.
    
129.468WHAT ???PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Jun 03 1993 17:179
    
    Can someone remind me of all this luck England have had recently, apart
    from the Poland match, which I would admit they were alittle lucky to
    get a result. Was it when they were lucky to get a draw against Holland
    or Norway, or lucky to beat Turkey and San Marino, or lucky to be shit
    in the European Championships....oh I know it was when we went to
    Poland last year and got another draw. Oh yeah...we are really lucky.
    
    Dave...
129.469You might be rightIOSG::PARKERJim ParkerThu Jun 03 1993 17:2018
    
    	I could see the FA choosing Keegan, he fits all the idiot criteria, 
    but it would be a mistake. Despite his performance getting Newcastle 
    promoted I still remember his telly appearances and the inane comments. 
    Didn't Clough refuse to appear on telly with him?
    
    	There must be an English speaking manager with the necessary 
    experience around - what about Andy Rox.... Forget it, wishful thinking 
    on my part.
    
    	On Norway though wasn't their "long ball" game terrific. I read 
    that the Norwegian manager compares their game to Wimbledons! Funny 
    man, it was classic long passes to players who could control the ball 
    and who would take on defenders. Really nice to watch. 
    
    	Norway might do you a favour and beat both Poland and Holland!
    
    
129.470BUSSTP::DSMITHWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRATThu Jun 03 1993 17:279
    
    
    re .468
    
     Your right Dave, England aren't/weren't lucky/unlucky. Their
    just utter crap.
    
    Danny.
    
129.471Lady Luck's gawn..DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Thu Jun 03 1993 17:3021
    Like I said, luck goes the way of the brave. If you're a bad team playing
    badly, then luck deserts you. If you're a good team playing well, you
    get the breaks. England used to get the breaks...they fought well
    enough in Poland to get the draw. They kept their heads, despite
    glaring misses by the POles that would have made the score 3-0. I
    remember well enough the luck they used to have. I can still remember
    the stunned silence that greeted the score Poland 1-1 England when it
    flashed across our TV screens in 1991. We were 6 minutes from
    qualifying for Sweden when Lineker scored the equaliser. You dont have
    Lineker anymore (why???) and Wright wouldnt even be fit to clean his
    boots. 
    
    I feel very sorry for all the genuine English Supporters. I would love
    to see England in the USA. I would feel much more empathy watching
    England play than watching, say, South Korea. I enjoy the (mostly)
    friendly banter in these notes, and will miss it next Summer.
    
    Taylor has gotta go. He's a PR specialist and will, rest assured, do
    all in his power to cover his as*. 
    
    *Tiger*
129.472Win The U.S. Cup (In Style) Or Go !!!!!PANIC::ANDERSONThe original MagpiesThu Jun 03 1993 17:3341
    
    Oh, how depressing !!!!!
    
    What amazes me most about Taylor, is that for months he's been moaning
    on about not being able to play a settled team because of injuries.
    
    Last night, only the absence of Ince was forced upon him. So what does
    he do; give the guys a chance to improve on Saturday's performance ?
    No, he completely changes the shape, style (??), and tactics. 
    
    Why oh why play with three centre-backs, forcing a natural winger to
    spend most of his time defending, play another sometime-centre-back in
    midfield, and put a dreadful passer of the ball in as an attacking
    right-back.
    
    He picked his team to counter what he saw as Norway's strengths, not
    one that capitalised on our own. He knew that a win would have been the
    best result, but IMO was scared of going out for it.
    
    The last manager I saw who changed his team week-in week-out to stifle
    the opposition led them from out of the old 1st Division and to the
    foot of the old 2nd [new 1st] Division. Where is Neil Warnock now ? 
    Nowhere - probably running his chiropody business again. I suggest 
    Mr. G. Taylor looks him up, 'cause if he carries on this way he too will 
    soon be an ex-football manager.
    
    England do have class players, and players with conviction and
    commitment (As do all of the 'home' countries to a greater or lesser
    extent). What they are lacking at the moment is some-one to blend them
    and allow them to play to their strengths. Taylor is not the man.
    
    Brian O.B.E. Clough, your country needs you. No doubt the Ivory Towers
    at Lancaster Gate will ignore all the pleas again, but surely, even
    some of the old buffers there couldn't fail to have felt shame and
    humiliation at last night's performance.
    
    Rob
    
    P.S. Congratulations to Norway - a well deserved victory for an
    attractive, well organised football team.
    
129.473Get Taylor out.IRNBRU::BARLOWThu Jun 03 1993 17:3416
    Well at least there's one thing that all the noters seem to agree on
    and that is Taylor is f*cking S*ITE.  But what we have here is a no win
    situation.  If England Qualify, Taylor will probably stay, and if they
    don't qualify he'll get the sack.  So what's it gonna be ?  A trip to
    the states or a new manager.  I'd rather have a new manager.  If the FA
    got their head out of their *ss maybe we could have both.  The next
    match is in Sept, so what they should do is let Taylor play the 3 Matches
    in the U.S and if he f*cks up like I know he will, then they have
    plenty of time to put in a new manager before sept.  I knew Taylor was
    a d*ckhead when he wouldn't play Waddle.  
      By the way, what do the majority of fans think about Hately ? should
    he be considered ? He was pretty devastating in the Euro-championships.
    What about him and Waddle in a side, Waddle puts the cross in for
    Hately's head ? 
    
    Will. 
129.474GET STUCK INSUBURB::ONEILLSThu Jun 03 1993 17:4167
    I watched the game in my local last night with the same bunch of lads
    who have watched SKY alll season.  I must say that you get a different
    perspective from the "real" football supporters in England to that
    portrayed on the press and TV.  Two of the stalwarts (Arsenal fans!)
    walked out at half time having seen enough.  At the end of the game
    there was unanimous agreement that England were stuffed.
   
    An early noter put his finger on it.  AT international level you have
    to fight for every ball for 90 minutes.  More and more of the smaller
    nations have made great progress in terms of organisation, skill and
    tactics.  Add this to passion and pride in your country and it's a
    powerful combination.  If you accept that any national squad,
    especially of a powerful nation like ENgland, has good players, the job
    of the manager is to motivate them to compete.
    
    Now I am grudgingly a fan of Jack Charlton but for me the essential
    difference between him and previous Irish managers (and the current
    English manager) is his two consistent battle cries over his long reign
    - "GO OUT AND COMPETE" and PUT THEM UNDER PRESSURE".  He has motivated
    a good squad to go where no Irish team has gone before.
    
    Watching last night's game brought back memories of Ireland's games
    when we were on the brink of making the breakthrough.  Looking at the
    Norwegian crowed reminded me of the heady days in Lansdowne when a
    frenzied crowd willed the team to vistory over Spain, the group
    leaders.
    
    Jack Charlton has moulded the traditional values of English league
    footballers into a cohesive unit.  It may not be pretty, but it works. 
    There is no way an Irish (or English) team under Jack Charlton 
    would have conceded the battle to Norway last night.  
    
    For some reason the English media seem to have a high notion of playing
    a fancy passing game.  This is not what English league players are good
    at.  Arsenal won two cups this years...Q.E.D. by competing and physical
    power.  
    
    Don't anyone tell me that Kevin Moran at 37 (or is it 38) is a better player
    than Des Walker.  However he wouldn't get caught like Walker did last
    night.  Norway had at least three English league players who wouldn't
    get within an asses roar of the English squad.
    

    For England the answer is to get back to basics.  Get stuck in. Get a
    manager to motivate the good club players that we "Celts" cheer every
    other week of the season.  Forget the fancy stuff and the Italian
    primadonnas.  Looks like England need defenders in the Steve Bruce
    mould...not elegant but effective, not fancy but forceful, not meek but
    a leader on the field.
    
    Now to the Baltics next week...fingers crossed that at least one
    "English League" based team will give Jimmy Hill, The Saint and co.
    something to talk about.
    
    I genuinely felt sorry for the "real" English fans in my local last
    night.
    
    
    Shane  
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
      
129.475I Love it!!!!!PEKING::MCKIENNICKThu Jun 03 1993 17:5618
    
    All this stuff is BRILLIANT to read.
    
    All because ENGLAND lose ONE game!!!!
    
    
    Maybe they should get used to losing more often, then it wouldn't be so
    painful.
    
    Imo Taylor should go, but if he did would it change anything?
     All England managers since Ramsey have been to scared to express
     themselves by picking THEIR TEAM. BECAUSE THEY ARE SCARED OF LOSING A
    GAME (ANY GAME).
    
    Anyway it's not over until the final whistle.
    
    
    Nick.
129.476UNTADH::WILCOCKSONBack in SchlagrahmlandThu Jun 03 1993 18:0711
    >>    All this stuff is BRILLIANT to read.
    >>    All because ENGLAND lose ONE game!!!!
    
    Which is probably why the managers are so scared. If it's like this
    in here, imagine what the gutter press are writing at this very minute.
    
    The answer is simple - burn down fleet street, sack Taylor (now!!!), give
    Big Ron the job, Oh! and shoot the 'fans' in the jail in Oslo.
    
    Al.
    
129.477How much better were we ? This much ?OSL09::BJARNEBjarne Mehl @NWOThu Jun 03 1993 18:2236
129.478luckGALVIA::SPAINTaylor must STAYThu Jun 03 1993 18:2932
    
    Re England and luck
    
    IMO
    
    1990 WC a little bit lucky to qualify, Poland hit the bar in the last
    minute and deserved more than a 0-0 draw.  Deserved to qualify over the
    whole group though.
    
    1990 WC lucky to get to the semis, Belgium and Cameroon both deserved
    to win
    
    1990 WC unlucky to lose to Germany.  Given that they were in the semis
    probably deserved to win the tournament.
    
    1992 EC lucky to draw v Ireland at Wembley, lucky to draw in Poland.
    
    1992 EC Finals got what they deserved
    
    1994 WC unlucky to draw at home to Holland and to a lesser extent
    Norway.  Got what they deserved v Turkey and San Marino.  Lucky to
    draw in Poland.
    
    Having said all of the above there is more to it than luck.  England
    showed character, grit and determination in some of the above games. 
    This was sadly lacking last night.  Gary Lineker's class saved England
    in the past.  Had he been playing last night he may have taken one of
    the half chances and England could have stolen a point.
    
    Gary.  
    
    Gary.
129.479South Korea to qualify!!!!!!KBOMFG::TANNERCalifornian Girls are more fun!!!!!Thu Jun 03 1993 18:3519
re .471....

    Tiger, South Korea will hardly be replacing England in the US. It will be
either Holland or Poland by the looks of things, who knows maybe both Holland
and Poland will qualify. I for one will be a lot happier to see Holland there
than England for a number of reasons. 

    The only decent football that England have played in the past few years was
in Italy, and I also cheered for them against Germany, so Iam not the anti
English git that some folks think Iam.  What pisses me off is the garbage the
English media think about this "unbeatable" team and we have a few noters in here
who behave the same.  I have feelings for the genuine supporters in here and can
only say  "it looks bad, but all is not lost".

   I honestly hope that Holland qualify, their history in the world cup is a
good one, and I believe we would all miss the skills of Van Basten, Guillit,
Bergkampf, Koeman and a few others....

                                                                  -dave-
129.480Time to get BRITISH...! :-)GVA05::BURKHALTERThu Jun 03 1993 18:5116
    Half the problem is always going to be that, there is a confusion
    between the English team and the English League which has provided
    great European Cup winners etc.
    
    These teams were made up of in general all BRITISH players up to
    quite recently.
    
    So the sooner we have a British team made up of Scots, English, Welsh,
    and Northern Ireland players the better. The World can give us
    the World Cup to keep as there wont be any point of a competition!
    
    :-) Dom.....
    
    What a team the late 60's would have had with Best,Law,Charlton,Greaves
    etc etc.....
                            
129.481Get rid of the F.A !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Thu Jun 03 1993 19:1727
    
    re: -1
    
    Yeah ! and the English would just end up draging everyone down to their
    own level.
    
    I've said it before and I will say it again. It's your so called school
    of excelence at Lilishawl (spelt that wrong) that has wrecked the
    English game. Your manager was *educated* there and most of your young
    footballing talent is there at this very moment having it personality surgically 
    removed. 
    Gazza,Hoddle,Waddle are over rated clowns hyped up by the English
    media. None of these players have made a mark on world football in the
    way Best,Pele,Van Basten etc... have, yet the English press would have
    us beleive otherwise.
    They were put on pedestals at a time when the English league were lost
    for a half decent world class player. Now for the first time in years a
    player worthy of world class status is there on the podium and Giggs is
    Welsh.
    To stop the rot you must get rid of the whole F.A mentality towards
    English football not just Taylor.
    
    Face it. The only chance for England is to find Celtic
    Irish/Scotish/Welsh players with English grannies and play them !
    
    An impartial Celt 
    
129.482I can see the hook thro' the bait.IRNBRU::BARLOWThu Jun 03 1993 19:331
    
129.483UNTADH::WILCOCKSONBack in SchlagrahmlandThu Jun 03 1993 19:494
    >>    Face it. The only chance for England is to find Celtic
    >>    Irish/Scotish/Welsh players with English grannies and play them !
    
    :^)
129.484It's not a bad pointBUSSTP::DSMITHWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRATThu Jun 03 1993 19:5013
    
    
     Actually, it's not a bad suggestion. One of the reasons why Scottish
    football is so bad at the moment is that the majority of plonkers
    coaching young players are all "trained" at the SFA school in Largs
    under the guidance of Andy Roxburgh and Craig Brown, the Scotland 1 and
    2. This means that they are all coached/trained the same way and after
    a couple of years, many good youngsters have all their ability stiffled
    and before we know it, they're lost to the game. They have to become
    good team players which means being able to run up and down the park
    for 90 minutes and fight for the jersey. Utter crap!!
    
     Danny.
129.485:-)RTOEU::RDELANEYThu Jun 03 1993 19:525
>in Italy, and I also cheered for them against Germany, so Iam not the anti
    
    But that's only because you live here isn't it ?
    
    	- Robin
129.486CALLME::MR_TOPAZThu Jun 03 1993 20:0012
       
       From this man's viewpoint in the States (including tickets for all
       1st round & quarterfinal games at Boston), I'd be pleased indeed
       if England stay home next year.  Just about any of the other
       EuroSides would be either more interesting to watch or better for
       ticket re-selling.
       
       On the other hand, England fans should take heart -- I think
       you've got a fine chance to get the upper hand when Your Boys take
       on San Marino.
       
       --Mr Topaz
129.487Who was that masked man ?FUTURS::ROWELLConquistador, in search of goldThu Jun 03 1993 20:0516
    
    Mr Topaz,
    
      Based on last nights performance, I doubt it.
    
    I have heard tha during a televised interview this lunch-time, the FA
    have given their backing to Taylor. Something about Taylor not being
    responsible for how the players perform on the pitch.
    
    Oh well.
    
    Anyway, as the next game is in September, would a new manager really
    have time to prepare for it ?
    
    Wayne
                                 
129.488SUBURB::WAITEGI WON'T DO WHAT YOU TELL METhu Jun 03 1993 20:059
    Re 470
    
    So what does that make Scotland then???
    
    
    
    
    
    Gary
129.489Norway were good too remember...MIACT::RANKINEThu Jun 03 1993 20:1230
    
    Im sure youll find in the inane Barnes v Giggs topic that Giggs is
    English but chose to play for Wales, as his mother is Welsh.
    
    We cannot have a British International team as the slots allocated to
    the leagues of England, Scotland,NI, and (now) Wales will be reduced.
    From an emotional, nationalistic point of view it wouldnt work..if they
    played at Wembley ther would be complaints of English bias, if the
    'ethnic minorities'  (I use this term loosely as NI, Scotland and Wales
    comprise a small % of UK population) wern't represented fairly there
    would be complaints.
    
    re a new manager...... My ideal replacement for taylor would be a
    manager who has proven success at club level, AND a lot of European
    experience.  At the time Taylor was appointed, Clough would have been
    the right man.  At this present time who is there ???  Hoddle, Keegan,
    Big Ron who have all been mentioned do not fall into this cateagory.  I
    guess only Ferguson, El Tel and George Graham would fit the bill
    ..would they want it ?? would England offer the post to a Scot ??
    would a Scot accept it ??, does El Tel want to finish his battle with
    Sugar ??  too much speculation.   Sacking Taylor at this time may have
    a negative effect to the remaining matches, so perhaps he should stay. 
    Who knows, with their pride stung, they might come out at the next game
    play really well, dominate the game totally, and score 4 .....and
    become the darlings of the scum press again.
    
    One bad game doesnt make a disaster make, and England are not out of it
    yet.
    
    Paul
129.490Wake up !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Thu Jun 03 1993 20:219
    
>    One bad game doesnt make a disaster, and England are not out of it
>    yet.
    
     Typical. Grasping at straws once again. Just face the facts. YOU'RE
    CRAP and you're NOT going to qualify for USA '94. How long does it take 
    for this simple message to sink in ? Somebody drop the penny quickly !
    
    	
129.491BLKPUD::WATTERSONPFour forks acheThu Jun 03 1993 20:356
    
    ummm excuse me.......
    
    Is this the world cup group 2 note or the Anti-English note ?
    
    Paul
129.492PLUNDR::MORANTripple ripple truffle shufflerThu Jun 03 1993 20:372
    
    Aren't they the same thing anyway?
129.493I like the English. Really I do.ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Thu Jun 03 1993 20:4813
    
    I'm not Anti-English. I just want you to wake up to the fact that your
    team is not one of the better teams in the world and nor do they
    have a god given right to be.
    When you get a team together who can play football with style and
    a manager and press corps with modesty I will be only too willing to 
    commend them.
    It's your arrogance in regard to football that pisses me off and it has 
    done since 1966.
    Get a grip,Get a Team, Get people to like you, Get El Tel (A man with
    credibility, popularity and who takes nor talks no bullshit)
    
    An Impartial Celt.
129.494CODS::ESBECKDec Van EsbeckThu Jun 03 1993 20:5227
    re .489
    
    totally agree with you about success at club level. England need a
    proven WINNER as a manager, not someone who's been good at building
    teams to move up through the league divisions and stop dead.
    
    When did England last have a manager who won a championship for
    Christ's sake? Alf Ramsey......
    
    All this talk of Big Ron is a joke.  What has he won?  Remember that
    unlike most managers, Atkinson has been fortunate enough to be involved
    with very big clubs since the seventies whether Man U, Wednesday or
    Villa, and what has he won? 
    
    
    What did Taylor win at Club level??? What did Bobby Robson win at club
    level? The F.A. Cup? 
    
    
    England had no leadership on the park last night. I don't believe they
    would have given as dismal a performance if Bryan Robson was
    Captain....now I'm not advocating his return, he's well past his
    sell-by date, but a new captain should be appointed for the next game.
    At one stage last night either Jimmy Hill or El Tel remarked that Platt
    went 25 minutes without being mentioned...some captain.
    
    Declan
129.495I would love to be wrong.....MIACT::RANKINEThu Jun 03 1993 20:5614
     Dear Mr Hayden,
    
    As I was the topic of your 'lets face it youre crap' response.
    
    Just a small point....I am Scottish, and yes we are crap.  I was
    talking about the English team, and I while I may wished to have
    expressed the same feelings as yourself, I tried to be diplomatic and
    offer some constructive, rather than destructive, opinions.  
    Try it sometime...
    
    I still dont think that England are out of it, but it will be tough for
    them.
    
    Paul
129.496Shouldn't you be rooting for NorwayAIMTEC::WICKS_AJune 7-13 Real Football in the U.SThu Jun 03 1993 20:557
    at the risk of interrupting this note could I remind everyone
    that should Norway beat Holland next week it may not be as bad as it
    looks.
    
    regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.497Mr. to you !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Thu Jun 03 1993 21:0410
    
    Dear Mr. Rankine,
    
    I was also refering to the English team and I am sure that this was
    obvious to you. My comments are constructive as the sooner the English
    public realise how bad their team and comentators are, the better for
    the future of world football. After all the English league and national
    Team are still important to the future of both our nations football.
    
    An impartial Celt
129.498Elephant and CastleFORTY2::ETHERIDGEcripesThu Jun 03 1993 21:1022
129.499Don Revie45736::MACDONALDThu Jun 03 1993 21:3512
Re a few back - the England manager before Robson and
Greenwood was Don Revie who at the time of his 
appointment was by far the most successful English 
manager - great team, 2 championships, FA cups etc - and
look what he did!

In general, OK England were crap  but only 2 games ago
against Holland I thought they played some of the best
football I've seen from an England team, especially in
the 1st half before Gascoigne got assaulted.

Jamie
129.500CODS::ESBECKDec Van EsbeckThu Jun 03 1993 21:428
    You're right, Revie won the league with a superb team (wasn't he
    England manager when Leeds won their second title?) but Leeds nickname
    at that period was "always the bridesmaid, nevber the bride". They won
    nothing near their potential......Leeds weren't the great winners they
    should have been. And in the end, Revie walked out on England.....after
    how long?
    
    Declan
129.501The silly Yoddlers won't qualifySTKOFF::SPERSSONPas de problemeThu Jun 03 1993 21:5926
    Thought I'd balance the England-bashing in here by putting in some
    Norway-bashing :-)
    
    Re: .496
    
>    at the risk of interrupting this note could I remind everyone
>    that should Norway beat Holland next week it may not be as bad as it
>    looks.
>    
>    regards,
>    
>    Andrew.D.Wicks
    
    ...and may I remind you Andrew that Norway have *never* won an away
    game against class opposition in *any* competition whatsoever. OK so
    they beat Holland. OK so they've beaten Italy. Everybody wins the odd
    home game, even Wales. To qualify you need results home *and* away.
    Norway are and remain a 3rd rate team and the fact that they beat
    England does not contradict this statement in any way. 
    
    Poland and Holland to qualify
    
    	cheers,
    
    		Stefan
129.502It's not all over yetGALVIA::SPAINTaylor must STAYThu Jun 03 1993 22:0818
    
    Following on Andrew's point.  The following scenario sees England
    qualify.
    
    Holland v Norway - draw
    England v Poland - home win
    San Marino v Holland - away win
    Holland v England - draw
    San Marino v England - away win
    Poland v Holland - draw
    
    England 14 pts
    Holland 13 pts
    
    Even if Holland win in Poland they could lose on goal difference as
    England will know how many they need in San Marino.
    
    Gary.
129.503KIRKTN::ISUTHERLANDSerial WasterThu Jun 03 1993 22:2615
    
    RE:.494
    
    Bobby Robson also led Ipswich to European success in 1981.
    IMO he quit (or was hounded out),the England job too soon,
    as he was just getting a decent side together in '90 before
    Taylor stepped in and ripped the guts out of it.Which is
    probably just as well for us Scots).:>)
    
    P.S.
    Since Scotland and N.Ireland are out of next year's WC,and
    England and Wales are as good as out,maybe we should reform
    the old British Championships.But then again,the F.A. would 
    never allow this since none of us "British" hooligans are
    allowed anywhere near London,are we? 
129.504Did we lose to Portugal or something?AIMTEC::WICKS_AJune 7-13 Real Football in the U.SThu Jun 03 1993 22:399
    Re .503,
    
    could you explain how Wales are "as good as out"?
    
    this I have to hear
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.505Taylor is a Turnip HeadESSB::BLONGUNITED Premier League CHAMPIONS 1993Thu Jun 03 1993 22:5517
129.506Hands Off Graham's Our ManNEWOA::GUTHRIE_JPanic SleeperFri Jun 04 1993 01:1131
    RE -1
    
    What makes you think that Graham would want to be England Manager
    because
    
    1...He is Scottish
    
    2...He is Arsenal through and through,the man has Arsenal
    memorobilia(sp) in his home and it's been said that this is why his
    first wife left him.
    
    3...He's got a European Campaign to look forward to with at least
    a successfull side that battles (more than you can say for England).
    
    Oh England can't have Fergie because Man U are so great but Graham's a
    likely candidate.
    
    Get real and Get bent
    
    
    Anyway I digress,have to agree with a few notes back would not be such
    a bad idea to keep Taylor as there is no way we will qualify with him
    and at least it will save us the embarrassment of a nightmare in the
    US.Although I had set my heart on going to America to watch England but 
    had this in mind before Taylor's self distruct job on the England team,
    England did look like they had the makings of a good side before he
    took over.
    
    Jason
    
    Jason
129.507What's a 1st or 2nd range football nation ?OSL09::BJARNEBjarne Mehl @NWOFri Jun 04 1993 13:2555
RE: .501

>    Thought I'd balance the England-bashing in here by putting in some
>    Norway-bashing :-)

     You are Swedish, aren't you ?
    
>    ...and may I remind you Andrew that Norway have *never* won an away
>    game against class opposition in *any* competition whatsoever. OK so
>    they beat Holland. OK so they've beaten Italy. Everybody wins the odd
>    home game, even Wales. To qualify you need results home *and* away.
>    Norway are and remain a 3rd rate team and the fact that they beat
>    England does not contradict this statement in any way. 
>    
>    Poland and Holland to qualify
>    
>    	cheers,
>    
>    		Stefan

     So the fact that we have these results:

	Norway - Holland	2-1
	England - Norway	1-1
	Norway - England	2-0
	Norway - Turkey		3-1
	Norway - San Marino    10-0
	San Marino - Norway	0-4

	22 scored - 3 behind Thorstvedt

     makes us a 3rd rate team ? So what is a 1st or a 2nd rate team ?

     We don't want to look back at our football history (even if we won the
     bronze medal in the '36 olympics :-). You are right about our history,
     but after "Drillo" joined as our manager, we have 5 losses out of 27
     matches. 
     In opposite to England, our football history is written in the 90's, 
     not in the 60's. Forgive me, I have always been a fan of English football,
     but the times they are a'changing. 

     Here is the statistics four our away matches after "Drillo", so you
     have a point, Stefan, but there is only 5 days to go for the Holland game.
    
	Away wins:	5   (Qatar, Tunisia, Bermuda, San Marino, Cypern)  :-)
	Away draws:	3   (England, Portugal, Italy)
	Away losses:	2   (China, Denmark)
     
     I think we *never* have been as strong as we are now. Not that I think we
     will beat Holland, but we can struggle for a draw. We have lost the
     respect for the _1st_ range nations.


Bjarne, (with good luck to Sweden, see you next year in the states !)
                          
129.508XSTACY::MDUNPHYJust another Day!!Fri Jun 04 1993 13:436
re a few back...

	Jason,
		You can always go over and watch the Irish!! 8^)

	Mick (who hopes to be there)
129.509FORTY2::FOWLERMFinishing's not his strong pointFri Jun 04 1993 14:5112
re: -2

How did Norway manage to lose to China?

Have they suddenly become a footballing superpower or is this even more 
embarrassing for England (i.e. we are not as good as China)?

Apparently Glenn Hoddle is not renewing his contract with Swindon so it's 
obvious that bert millichip has had a sly word with him and he'll be taking
over from Graham Taylor soon. 8-) (In my dreams)

Mike
129.510Come in Graham ..MACNAS::JMALLONFri Jun 04 1993 15:0323
    
    Congratulations to Norway on a well deserved win. Some lovely football
    - it is a pity that they didn't want to score in the last half an hour.
    What ever Graham Taylor/ the English press were thinking about talking 
    about 3/4 points from the last two games I'll never know. In both matches 
    England looked second best.
    
    Talyor leaving - hopefullly (not! - for non Englnad supporters). The man
    is to international football management what John Major is to 
    international politics. Dull, Boring, radiates an air of cluelessness (?) 
    and despair to those around. 
    
    The (late) replacements - clough, El Tel and big fat ron. Great managers
    who have made good teams with little or nothing to work with. Also great 
    media manipulators in their own way. To add to this list how about the
    one and only "Big Mal" Allison. With any of the above, England could still
    get beat by smaller nations who didn't invent the game but at least the 
    after match interviews would be worth listening to. 
    
    ;-)
    
    John M.
       
129.511We'll we see you in the States, SCOTLANDPEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S BACKFri Jun 04 1993 15:1818
    
    I'm still confident we'll qualify, all be it with the help of the
    other Countries. The only problem with this is, Taylor will still be in
    charge the only way he'll leave is if we fail to qualify. So it looks
    as if we are stuck with him until after the World Cup Final.
    
    Lets put it this way, everyone will have forgotton Wednesdays Result when
    David Platt leads us to the final next year, I won't be arrogant and
    say we'll win it but, you never know in a finals. If the last few
    Tournements are anything to go by there has been a steady progression
    and pattern to Englands World Cup Campaign.
    
    86  Quarter Final's
    90  Semi Final's
    94  Final..
    98  FINAL**WINNERS** if we don't win it in 94
    
    Neil... 
129.512BUSSTP::DSMITHWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRATFri Jun 04 1993 15:2613
    
    
     Neil, isn't it about time you changed your profile header. The fat
    chappie, once again couldn't kick his backside when the pressure was
    on. Given the number of caps he's got, how often has he actually played
    as well as a "world-class superstar" should? Ok, he's done the business
    against a few minnows but that's about it. He occassionally plays well
    for his Italian club but any average to good player should be able to 
    do that when in a team with quality players around him.
    
     I'm afraid the verdict is still the same "Gazza'a a PRAT"
    
     Danny.
129.513As Requested!!PEKING::COSSEYNWORLD BEWARE DSMITH'S A PRATFri Jun 04 1993 15:365
129.514Stay Away From The USA !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Fri Jun 04 1993 15:3920
129.515FORTY2::FOWLERMFinishing's not his strong pointFri Jun 04 1993 15:4211
Neil,

Your confidence in England reveals me to be a pseudo-fairweather fan. Only 
a true supporter can watch us get massacred by a second-rate Scandinavian team
and conclude that next year we'll be in the World Cup Final.

I am lost in admiration. 8-)

Go England: I will never doubt you again.

Mike
129.516SCRAP THE SYSTEMYUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingFri Jun 04 1993 15:4549
    
    	This is not a note inspired by a dreadful defeat in the vain of "oh
    my god what has happened to England"  or "Sack the manager"
    	THis is an opion that I have carried for a few years now. 
    	I hope England do not qualify for the finals. Then, and only then,
    will pepole start to realise just how dreadful the English game in
    general has become. The whole system needs to be re-thought. Our method
    and style of play stems from the way young kids are taught to play the
    game - or how they see the game played. There is so much emphasis on
    athleticism and hard work that most of our players are excellent
    athletes who can run at 90mph for the full 90 minutes. The current
    teaching at th School of Excellence (!!) is route one football relying
    on a strong tackle in defence and then a quick hoof to a fast forward
    ie Arsenal, Adams to Wright. There are plenty of youngsters who have
    lots of skill and like to take time on the ball and play neat passing
    movements. These players though are nearly always then criticised for
    not using their Ben Johnson-like forwards properly or not working hard
    enough for the team in chasing back and hasseling the opposition. Young
    players especially then lose heart and either try to change the way
    they play or they are lost to the game permanently. We need to develop
    a school of true Excellence that teaches players such things as skill
    and how to create space and time for themselves. WE have players that
    can do that, the likes of Giggs, Hoddle, Gascoigne and Waddle. these
    players again get criticism for not chasing back and throwing in 
    crunching tackles.
    
    	We do produce some talented and skillfull players but where we lag
    behind the rest of Europe and also the emerging African nations is the
    level of skill through the whole team. Every player including defenders
    should have some skill, they should be comfortable to run with the
    ball, to pass it accurately and to be happy to keep the ball at their
    feet for more than two seconds.
    
    	Until we can re-educate the system England - and the other home
    natins cannot expect to be Winners. 
    
    	As I said at the start of this soap box speech, I have thought this
    for some time now. I am a die hard Arsenal fan but I do not go to see
    them anymore - nor do I make any special effort to see any League games
    of any club. I just do not find the football played in 98% of these
    games enjoyable. The only games I make an effort to watch are the
    Italian League on Channel 4! Usually much more interesting and
    enjoyable to watch.
    
    
    
    		Tony B. 
    
    
129.517Just a disaster.BUSSTP::DSMITHWORLD BEWARE!! GAZZA'S A PRATFri Jun 04 1993 15:5621
    
    
    re last
    
     That's the most sensible note in this conference for years. As was 
    said, it applies to football in Britain as a whole, not just 1 
    country. The whole system, schools of excellence, coaching schools
    etc have ruined football in this country so much that we are now far
    behind in real footballing terms. We'll probably always be there or
    there abouts because of our "great fighting and team spirit" (god I
    hate that saying) but as for ever winning anything, forget it. 
    
     The problem is trying to change the system. I don't know how it
    operates in England, but up here in Scotland, almost all the coaches
    with league clubs and many of the youth and junior coaches all go
    through an SFA caoching school and are basically trained to think, act
    and talk the same way. You then see boys club "managers" standing at 
    the sidelines in their fancy club trench coats, berating 5 and 6 year
    olds for not coming back to defend or mark space. 
    
     Danny.
129.518Is it Shoe size time ?FUTURS::ROWELLConquistador, in search of goldFri Jun 04 1993 16:1551
    Mr Impartial Celt,
    
    For someone who claims to be impartial, I find your comments incredibly
    offensive.
    
    You keep on stating that we English supporters must face facts that
    "You are crap" and "You are not going to qualify for U.S.A. 94".
    
    Fair enough. That is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. But you
    blindly ignore facts that do not suit you. Except for one or two
    English 'Rednecks', we all realise that the last two games England have
    played, they played very badly. We know that Taylor is not a good
    manager, and that he has not got a good team. We have been acknowledging
    these facts for the last 100+ notes. Even the Press (including the
    better Newspapers) have been heralding these facts to all who would
    read them.
    
    The biggest fact that you ignore totally, is that England CAN still
    qualify for the finals in U.S.A. 94. Granted, they probably wont, but
    none the less, it is still a possibilty. That, Mr Celt, IS a FACT.
    Whether or not the standard of football played is pleasing to you,
    or the rest of the world is not a criteria for which qualification
    is based. Naturally, WE would like to see England in the Finals.
    
    As this is the note to discuss the group that England play in, and
    as we are English, we are allowed (unless someone changed the rules)
    to discuss the chances/performances etc of our National team. And long
    may we continue to do so.
    
    I find it amazing that that the cornerstone for you hatred of English
    Football are the constant reminders of 1966.
    1: Why should we not be allowed to mention and reflect upon past success ?
    2: Why is it always the non English who always bring it up ? (Scan this
       topic, and record all notes mentioning 1966)
    
    Please remember that the English are allowed to be as partisan in the
    support of England as the rest of the world is in their own countries.
    If we choose to want/demand/expect better of our National teams, that
    is our concern. If we want to be over the top, we will. If we expect
    a God given right to be successfull, then so what ?. It is only
    ourselves that we delude. It is us that end with our pride hurt. Are
    you really afraid that you may end up believing it ?
    
    Please go back to the topic of your own group, and stop this mud
    slinging that you enjoy so much. There have been many comments,
    views and opinions that have been constructive, and that I have enjoyed
    reading, and I would like to thank the contributors for them. 
    
    An Impartial Anglo-Saxon
    
    
129.519Here HereFUTURS::ROWELLConquistador, in search of goldFri Jun 04 1993 16:195
    P.S.
    
    I agree with .516 (and .517) wholeheartedly.
    
    Wayne
129.520ARRODS::OHAGANBnotes from hellFri Jun 04 1993 16:477
    Here's my annual Big Ron for England supremo entry:
    
    Big Ron For England supremo!
    
    And there you had it.
    
    barry. 
129.521NOT DEAD YETMACNAS::SMORANFri Jun 04 1993 16:5528
    England are not dead and buried yet, they might be on a life support
    machine but if they win their three matches, they could be on the way
    to recovery.
    
    I think the difference with the Norway match and the Holland match was
    the attitiude of the manager. In Wembly he picks a team to attack and
    attack they did. Then he turns around and picks a team to counter act
    the Norwegians. Why worry about the opposition, play to your own
    strenghts (and ye do have them) and let them worry about you.
    
    As regards coaching, I agree with everythink said. I had the experience
    of bringing a youth over for trial with Villa a few years ago. This
    youth could dribble with a sixpence. He was an out and out winger. We
    stayed for two weeks and he was coached in speed & stamina for 90% of
    the  time and skills 10%. He finally got a match prior to leaving. In
    the first half he got about three kicks of the ball, which he then
    layed off. At half time I questioned him around his display and asked
    if he was nervous. The reply shocked me. He was told that he had a
    square of ground to cover and he was not to leave it. I immediately
    told the manager that he would not be playing in the second half and
    gave my reasons. He agreed to allow him 20 mins to prove himself. This
    he did by scoring 2 and laying on 2. He was also offered to sign. Does
    this type off attitude promote good football.
    
    Regards
            Stephen
    
      
129.522Sow the seeds now for 2002 ??MIACT::RANKINEFri Jun 04 1993 16:5936
    well the last couple of notes have been encouraging...
    
    A lot to do with the decline in standards in our little island has to
    do with the 'win at all costs' attitude ..win trophies, not friends.
    This coupled with the fear of losing and the business pressure of
    making profit must play a factor.  As someone stated earlier, any
    revival has to start at an early age and move upwards.  If kids are
    being subjected to the win or bust attitude at 5 or 6 years old, then
    we dont have any hope for the future.
    
    In the days of the Dutch 'total football' one of the reasons given was
    that in Dutch schools football the kids had to play in a different
    position from the one that they played in the previous week.  Im not
    sure whether this was strictly the case, or how it could be 'enforced'
    but it sounds like a great idea to me.  There was no doubt that the
    Dutch team of the 70's were great individual players, but played as a
    team as well.  It could be argued that they didnt win a great
    deal...but that attitude is what Im saying is the problem.
    
    If the schools of excellence could advocate such a programme, Im sure
    that the quality of our football would start to improve at the top
    level in some 7-10 years time.  Unfortunately as we know, very few
    people are prepared to invest in long term benefits...but somethings
    got to be done...or well end up with a country full of Wimbledons and a
    national team(s) where night games require searchlights and not
    floodlights !!.
    
    Paul
    
    
    
    Popular managers in this (and other notes) are Clough, El TEl, Hoddle,
    Keegan etc....all of whom want to have teams who play football.  An
    underlying reason for the Sugar v El Tel situ is that Terry wants his
    team to play good football (and if they win something thats a bonus)
    Sugar wants Tottenham to win...and make profit.
129.523Brialliant Notes !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Fri Jun 04 1993 17:1317
     
    re:518
    
    GOTCHA !
    
    re: All on coaching
    
    Excelent notes. Couldn't agree more.
    Just look back to the times when you and I were kids and played street
    football. On the working class streets of Britain & Ireland that was where 
    true genius was bred. Emulating our idols. Trying to do the little
    flicks , the body swerves, etc... The kids of today don't see that kind
    of thing on a week in week out basis any more (unless they watch
    Channel 4) and thus they have nothing to copy. We are losing agrip on a
    great game and the rot started with the F.A school of excelence.
    
    An Impartial Celt.
129.524CHEFS::HOUSEBFri Jun 04 1993 17:136
    re .486
    
    Mr Topaz - are you implying that you are a ticket tout ???? I hope not.
    
    		Brian
    
129.525Ha Ha Ha, I'm rolling around here...PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCFri Jun 04 1993 17:1610
    
    ESSB::PHAYDEN
    
    RE. GOTCHA...
    
    Well done, that was really good, your a real card.
    
    Yawn.
    
    Dave...
129.526Brooking Brief(ly)YUPPY::ASHLEYSMITHwhoops, there goes another year..Fri Jun 04 1993 17:229
    Anyone here Trevor Brookings comments when Les Ferdinand missed
    England's only real "chance" early in the 2nd half. 
    
    "finishing is not his strong point"
    
    England's centre forward can't finish. Frightening isn't it.
    
    Andy
    
129.527Oh that's what it is !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Fri Jun 04 1993 17:246
    
    re:525
    
    Was that satire ? Oh you are a clever boy !
    
    An Impartial Celt.
129.528FORTY2::FOWLERMFinishing's not his strong pointFri Jun 04 1993 17:307
re .527

Was that sarcasm?

Do you write all your own material?

You're a funny man. Perhaps you should audition for the Russ Abbot show.
129.529PLUNDR::MORANTripple ripple truffle shufflerFri Jun 04 1993 17:337
    
>You're a funny man. Perhaps you should audition for the Russ Abbot show.
    
    There's already a queue forming, headed by Graham Taylor and his
    clowns. I'm not a slapstick fan myself though.
    
    Tim
129.530Nope!ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Fri Jun 04 1993 17:359
    
    re:528
    
    No. If I wanted to be sarcastic I would have said
    
    "England have a great chance of getting to USA '94"
    
    An Impartial Celt.
    
129.531FORTY2::FOWLERMFinishing's not his strong pointFri Jun 04 1993 17:375
re: last

Ooooh. Cutting.

8-)
129.532BLKPUD::WATTERSONPFour fox acheFri Jun 04 1993 17:3715
                                 
    The fact that the Wimbledons, Sheff Utds and Arsenals are
    'succesful' in the Premier league means that nothing will change in
    English football. 
    
    None of the above teams play football - they are spoilers, they deny
    other teams space and possession and hope to score the odd goal from
    free kicks, corners or hopeful long balls - very little from open
    football. It's boring to watch, does nothing to encourage skill - but
    it gets results and may win the odd cup or two. Few 'footballing' teams
    can play against it, so it just encourages the rest to drop to that
    level. 
    
    Paul
    
129.533Not much fight or spiritNEWOA::FIDO_TAin't it great !Fri Jun 04 1993 17:4012
>    behind in real footballing terms. We'll probably always be there or
>    there abouts because of our "great fighting and team spirit" (god I
>    hate that saying) but as for ever winning anything, forget it. 
    
    Danny,
    
    	whilst agreeing with your sentiments, the biggest disgrace about
    the game in Norway was that the England team did not EVEN have "great 
    fighting and team spirit".
    
    	Terry
    	
129.534FUTURS::ROWELLConquistador, in search of goldFri Jun 04 1993 18:177
    I am almost afraid to aask this, but is the squad going to the
    States the same as that which returned to a hero's welcome yesterday ?
    
    Could someone post the squad ?
    
    Thanks,
    Wayne
129.535Proof that I am...ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Fri Jun 04 1993 18:188
    
    re:532
    
    You should have included Ireland there also.
    
    Does that prove my impartiallity ?
    
    An impartial Celt.
129.536SIOG::BUCKLEYFri Jun 04 1993 18:204
I saw in one of the 'quality' papers that two senior England players were leading
a players revolt against Graham Failure. Anyone heard anything about this?

Patrick.
129.537CODS::ESBECKDec Van EsbeckFri Jun 04 1993 18:2022
    re -2
    
    Paul,
    
    Arsenal have scored more goals than anyone in recent years, although
    not this season. They were top scorers in 89, 91 and 92. I wouldn\t
    call that the odd goal....and in 1991 they received a good press for
    their performances.....
    
    The fact is, England could perm any 11 players from 20-25 and still do
    just as well. Look at the Republic of Ireland - as many people have
    mentioned, they do consistently better with a much smaller squad
    selected from the same pool, and they don't have better players, they
    probably aren't even as good. Are Quinn, Aldridge and Cascarino better
    than Wright, Shearer et al? No, they're not! Are Mick McCarthy and
    Kevin Moran better than Pallister, Walker, Adams et al? No they're not.
    
    It's 80% attitude, which is where you have to blame the manager.
    
    Declan
    
    Declan
129.538CODS::ESBECKDec Van EsbeckFri Jun 04 1993 18:247
    ....and I watched the Italian football on last Sunday, which featured
    Milan. It was dire stuff.
    
    Why is English soccer far more popular in Norway than the Italian
    League games?
    
    Declan
129.539What a RecordESSB::BLONGUNITED Premier League CHAMPIONS 1993Fri Jun 04 1993 18:355
129.540BLKPUD::WATTERSONPFour fox acheFri Jun 04 1993 18:4017
    
    Declan,
    
    I've seen Arsenal a few times over the last couple of years - when they
    last won the league, they had a very strong midfield and were capable
    of creating goals from any position - last season they abandoned the
    midfield and had a strong defence and one exceptional goalscorer up
    front.
    
    Ireland's record isn't really that much different to England's over the
    last couple of years - agreed the Irish always seem to give 100% -
    which England didn't against Norway, but their never going to win
    anything - basically because they've got to pick their players from the
    same league as England.
    
    
    Paul
129.541We've had our fair share of them..GYMAC::DCASSIDYFri Jun 04 1993 18:4422
    
    Paul,
    	Whilst I agree that the 'spoilers' in the game are not pretty to
    watch, can you remember the Argentina team in Italy and the German team
    in Mexico '86....slight spoilers and both reached the Final. In fact
    the German team of '86 was the biggest example of a team getting far
    on identifying just 1 or 2 chinks in the armour of the opposition.
    Having just spent a month in the USA and spoken to the locals on the
    game (over a beer whilst watching the Bulls v Knicks basketball) they
    couldn't be bothered watching the game because of this spoiling
    attitude and long periods where effectively nothing happens. He said
    however that he liked watching the women play football because they
    just went for it (I surreptitiously hinted that that might be because
    the USA womens team are pretty good).
    
    I hope that the 3 poists for a win in the '94 Finals will prove a
    success and whittle its way down to the qualifying groups.
    
    Cheers,
    
    	Dezzz.
    
129.542A few reflectionsKEEGAN::TURNERFri Jun 04 1993 19:01106
Well, I've been read-only in this conference for a long while now. I used to
participate in the old FOOTBALL conference but I've been loathe to do so in
this one, largely through lack of time and, quite frankly, because of the
feeling of boredom aroused by so many so-called football fans who are unable to
watch a game from a neutral point-of-view but have to resort to provoking those
who support a different team from them while defending the dubious merits of
their own team. Note 129 is the example to end all examples.

I don't think any fair-minded Englishman has any problem in acknowledging
Norway's superiority the other night. I only saw highlights here in Italy (the
game was shown live on a pay-only channel) but those highlights and the reports
I've heard (plus the ample coverage in this conference) only point to one
thing: England were fortunate to lose 2-0. 

What I find extraordinary is the reaction in this note - comments ranging from
"I can't deny I'm delighted that England won't be going to U.S.A." to "You're
crap and the sooner you realise it the better". To summarize, we have (correct
me if I'm wrong):

- One Norwegian noter, duly elated about his team's victory, but gracious 
  enough to refrain from gloating.

-  A couple of England supporters with wool over their eyes who obviously are
   living on a different planet.

- Umpteen England supporters who are very sporting in defeat, *scathing* (in 
  some cases exageratedly so, IMO) about their own team and with various 
  solutions to the Great National Problem.

- Umpteen predominantly Irish/Scottish supporters, the majority of whom (and 
  there are exceptions) seem more delighted when England lose than when their 
  own teams win.  

And it's to this last group that I address the rest of my note. 

Take time off to extract all the replies in 129 and remove any written by the
Terrible Duo (we all know who they are). If you can find *any* traces of
English arrogance in the remainder, by all means start a new note with a
suitable title. I'm *convinced* that if the boot had been on the other foot
and, say, Ireland were in England's position, we'd have seen at least half the
last 50 notes set hidden. Analysing the reactions after the England-Ireland 
matches of recent years, I sincerely cannot understand what is the bee in the
Irish bonnet; maybe one day they'll reveal all. But read on.

The chief grievance seems to be with the tabloids/Jimmy Hill. Well, luckily, I
rarely get to see a British tabloid out here in Italy, but I regularly buy the
Guardian...and pro-English it most certainly ain't. You want examples? David
Lacey refers to the period when English clubs dominated the European Cup for 8 
successive years as the Dark Age of European Football. 

But this is beside the point. If I don't like Slimline salad dressing, I DON'T 
BUY IT. Instead of whimpering about the tabloids, try reading something else. 
I'm sure it's a worldwide phenomenon anyway. Out here, there's a sports 
newspaper called La Gazzetta dello Sport which is about as moderate as the 
Pravda! You'd think that the rest of the world only existed to provide target 
practice for Italy's extraordinary football machine ("...never mind if his 
name's Van Basten, *we* taught him how to play football..."). Personally, I
wouldn't want my fish-and-chips wrapped in a British tabloid and I'd like to 
think that most of the English noters here share the same opinion. 

That said, I've been pretty pissed off with Ian St. John, Pat Crerand and
Archie McPherson in recent years (thank God, I don't have to put up with them
any more...although the Italians have some more than worthy substitutes!). I
won't forget Ian St. John's antics after Uruguay knocked Scotland out of the
1986 World Cup, nor the all-round whooping after Archie Gemmill's goal against
Holland in 1978. *Very* objective commentating. 

The Irish deserve a special mention. I've always stuck up for them in the
past and admired their grittiness. But God knows, from a footballing point of
view there's precious little else to admire (sorry to differ with a good number
of the Irish contributors to this conference). If ever it was more true that
beauty is in the eye of the beholder! I'd like to think of Keane, Houghton and 
Sheridan when I talk about Big Jack's team; unfortunetely, the
images that spring to mind are Donkeys (Donkies?) Staunton, O'Leary and Quinn.
I recall sitting down to watch a video of Ireland-Italy in the U.S. Cup last
year and, yes, at the beginning of the game I had my green-tinted spectacles
on. Suddenly, I found myself fast-forwarding at random through sheer boredom. 
Well, I was in bed 40 minutes after the kick-off. Certainly, one of the most 
atrocious games of football I've ever had the displeasure to see and I won't
even mention the Italian opinion of Ireland's brand of non-football. In
retrospect, I was only too glad that the U.S. showed Ireland a thing or two
about how to play attractive football. Because for me, FOOTBALL must always be
the winner.

You can criticise England as much as you like, and much of the constructive
criticism is well-appreciated (at least by me). But I have a sneaky feeling
that those who object to the England's perseverance with ball-players such as 
Gascoigne, Barnes, Waddle, Hoddle and co. are the same people who have 
criticised Talbot, Reid, Ball, Batty and any other "workhorse" from the last 30
years who you'd care to mention. Too easy. 

I could carry on ad infinitum. Suffice to say, congratulations Norway (I'd be
considerably more "hearty" if I'd actually seen the game!) and a constructive
point to ponder on, which (strangely) no one has mentioned yet. Can England's
problem not be put down to a total inability to perform away from home?
Otherwise, how can we explain the difference in home/away performances in
recent years against Norway (who had ONE shot on target at Wembley), Turkey, 
France, Holland, Poland, Cameroun, etc.? 

Dom (who realises that the line of discussion has changed a little during the 
last rush of notes, but couldn't post this till now!)

P.S. Don't worry, Messrs. TANNER and Impartial Celt (closet Irishman?) - we
know you're not anti-English really. I'm sure you only put your racist hats on 
when you write in this conference...     
129.543Well written, well balanced note, now there's a noveltyYUPPY::PANESWin your weight in fishFri Jun 04 1993 19:240
129.544Good one !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Fri Jun 04 1993 19:2813
    
    re: 542
    
    An excelent note. You should contribute more often.
    I'd love to write a reply but I gotta go.
    
    An Impartial Celt. (Nothing closet about, I'm IRISH and not
    			particularly proud of our style of football)
    
    
    
    P.S  But at least we're going to the U.S 
    
129.545aaaaahhh quit yer bitchin..!!DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Fri Jun 04 1993 19:5414
    I'm Irish and I object to some of the cr*p thats being written
    against the English. It's almost like some of us are so insecure in our
    sense of worth as a sovereign and independent people that we must
    deride the English to derive any self-belief in *OUR*selves and *our*
    abilities.
    
    I don't need to slag anyone else to enhance my self-esteem. Crowing at
    another team's misfortune to this extent is , at least, hurtful and
    causes unneeded aggravation. Thats not the way of the average Irish
    Football Fan. We're party dudes, not hooligans. We've built up a damn
    good name as civilised supporters. Lets maintain that good name both on 
    the terraces *and* in the notes file.   
	
      *Tiger*
129.546England are nearly out.ESSB::MCUNNIFFEPool-73,76,77,79,80,82-4,86,88,90Fri Jun 04 1993 21:4737
<<< Note 129.544 by ESSB::PHAYDEN "It's not how long it takes but how well you do it..." >>>
                                -< Good one ! >-
    
    >>> (Nothing closet about, I'm IRISH and not
    >>>  particularly proud of our style of football)
    
    
    
    There is absolutely nothing wrong with our style of football. In players
like Aldridge, Whelan, Houghton, Townsend, Keane, Staunton, Phelan, Irwin &
Mcgrath, we have the best footballers in Europe. Ireland can play attractive
football against any side. 

Even if they did play boring football, it doesn't matter as long as the 
result is right. Football is not about nice attractive football played on the
ground. It's about getting a result if that means kicking the ball into the
stands to keep a 1-0 lead. Where did Cloughie's nice brand of football get
him??.

Getting back to England, they were pathetic the last night. The FAT MARS BOY
didn't get a look in. It's a pity somebody didn't break his jaw again. Maybe
he would have come out of his sleep. Lee Sharpe on the left wing was worse
than useless. Well done to the Norwegians.

When Taylor looks at the plonkers in his midfield, he must be very envious of
Big Jack with midfielders like Staunton, Keane, Townsend, Houghton & Whelan
and a lethal strike force of Aldo & Quinn plus two of the best international
full backs in Irwin & Phelan.


 Look's like we are the only country out of the five local countries to be
going to the USA. I would love to see Wales get there as well.


    C U N N O 
    

129.547MASALA::GPIKEUp the Rosey Posey.Sat Jun 05 1993 03:5314
    
    ref note .532 about Arsenal.
    
    About 3yrs ago I watched Arsenal play Liverpool in an English Cup match 
    at Anfield. Now for a team thats susposed to be full of spoilers they 
    played Liverpool off the park due too really entertaining and good
    football, but due to a bit off brillance by Barnes the game ended with 
    a draw. I,m not an Arsenal susporter by I do disagree that they're
    spoliers and bad for the game.
    
    I'm also glad England got beat as they've been slagging Norway for some
    time now  and they got what there display on the night deserved.
    
    Gordon.
129.548Gloating suspendedOSLACT::HENRIKWGood news is a bad omenMon Jun 07 1993 13:1515
    Amid all the online hooligans in the FOOTBALL conference,
    reply 542 was a pleasure to read.
    
    As a Norwegian, I must admit I even enjoyed every "note set hidden"
    after last week's game - interpreting them as additional proof of
    our success. ;^)  Triviawise, it should be noted that the Norwegian
    TV commentator last week is one of Norway's biggest fans of English
    football. He had a hard time accepting the fact that this time
    Norway played as excellently as England used to do, whereas England
    looked like the typical Norwegian playing from some years back.
    
    I'll refrain from further gloating until we've played Holland
    on Wednesday...
    
    Henrik 
129.549FA cup final 93..the worst one ever ??MIACT::RANKINEMon Jun 07 1993 16:278
    re -2
    
    Ill think youll find that the comment on Arsenal was that 3 yrs ago
    they were playing good football.  Its just that recently they seemed to
    have adopted a stifle the opposition and depend on the break style of
    play which is not great to watch...a la Bayern Munich in the 70's.
    
    Paul
129.550Do the Midfield Shake-upARNIES::SMITHP1P U S H O double FMon Jun 07 1993 20:3819
> re: Note 129.526 by YUPPY::ASHLEYSMITH "whoops, there goes another year.."
>
>    Anyone here Trevor Brookings comments when Les Ferdinand missed
>    England's only real "chance" early in the 2nd half. 
>    
>    "finishing is not his strong point"
>    
>    England's centre forward can't finish. Frightening isn't it.

	Shows what Brooking knows ! Players like Sherringham, and
	Ferdinand 'finish' for their club sides. The reason they are
	failing in this respect, for their country, is due to lack
	of decent balls from midfield. However, in my opinion you need
	forwards that can fight for a ball as well as finish, not the
	'standing around on the off chance that the ball might come along'
	beloved of certain England forwards who will remain nameless.

		p1
	
129.551Norway still have everything to proveSTKOFF::SPERSSONPas de problemeMon Jun 07 1993 21:3134
    
>>    Thought I'd balance the England-bashing in here by putting in some
>>    Norway-bashing :-)
>
>     You are Swedish, aren't you ?
    
    Correct.
    
>     So the fact that we have these results:
>
>	Norway - Holland	2-1
>	England - Norway	1-1
>	Norway - England	2-0
>	Norway - Turkey		3-1
>	Norway - San Marino    10-0
>	San Marino - Norway	0-4
>
>	22 scored - 3 behind Thorstvedt
>
>     makes us a 3rd rate team ? So what is a 1st or a 2nd rate team ?

    
    It's simply too early for the hype. Show some realistic expectations,
    don't fly so high and maybe it won't hurt so much when you fall down.
    
    The list above shows very well what I'm trying to say. You've played
    minnows (San Marino, Turkey), has-beens (England) and admittedly got one
    good result (Holland). You still have to meet the two main competitors
    of the group, Holland and Poland, away from home. Get results there and
    I'll change my mind.
    
    cheers,
    
    	Stefan
129.552Let's not give up the ghost!KEEGAN::TURNERMon Jun 07 1993 21:3542
    >I'm Irish and I object to some of the cr*p thats being written against the 
    >English. It's almost like some of us are so insecure in our sense of worth 
    >as a sovereign and independent people that we must deride the English to 
    >derive any self-belief in *OUR*selves and *our* abilities. 
      
    Tiger, I certainly didn't have any of *your* notes in mind when I
    criticised the general nature of the Irish/Scottish entries in 129! On
    the contrary, you've been more constructive in your criticism than the
    vast majority of the English noters.
    
    As for the Irish fans, I've yet to hear a bad word about them. Contrast
    that with our shower. The only relief on Wednesday night came from the
    news that nearly all the arrests had been made BEFORE the match -
    there's nothing worse than losing and then being classed as poor
    losers.
    
    I can remember going to see Belgium v England in Bologna during WC90.
    It probably wasn't a vintage performance by the England fans but they
    still managed to make a nuisance of themselves. Fortunately, I had no
    problem blending in with the locals and I'd bought my ticket in Milan
    anyway, so I was able to watch the game with a group of Belgians, a
    couple of Italians and a couple of the more civilised England
    supporters. 
    
    Re. what needs to be done with English football, I can't agree with
    those who think a total shakeup is necessary, although I wouldn't mind
    seeing a few changes on the administrative side. I don't see any
    problem with the sort of players who are coming out of our system -
    although we have capped a few players in the last couple of years who I
    wouldn't personally consider international quality (Sinton, Curle,
    Merson, perhaps one or two others). Holland, Germany, Italy and Brazil
    all have their equivalents of Batty and Palmer - don't tell me that
    Wouters, Reuter, Dunga and Dino Baggio are thoroughbreds! 
    
    Anyway, there's still room for optimism. Holland will be delighted with
    that last result if only because it's taken the spotlight off their own
    team who have been nothing less than appalling since EC92. I'd
    sincerely like to know from Mr. Tanner exactly what he finds
    entertaining about the current Dutch team, Bergkamp apart.
    
    Dom
    
129.553FergieHEAVY::WARDMon Jun 07 1993 22:109
    RE: alot-further-back-but-I-can't-remember-the-number ..
    
    If Alex Ferguson (he from swoon! ManU) were to manage England, not
    only would he have led a Scottish and England club side to winning
    their respecive leagues, but he would also have led the National
    teams (not saying where though).   Remember - he was Scotland
    manager for WC86 ..
    
    Ray
129.554HEAVY::WARDMon Jun 07 1993 22:123
    Also - is the Holland-Norway match being shown on English TV ??
    
    Thanks - Ray
129.555Platt out, Ince inFORTY2::FOWLERMFinishing's not his strong pointTue Jun 08 1993 14:0612
I read on CEEFAX this morning that Paul Ince is to Captain England in the U.S.

Perhaps there is hope after all...

Taylor says the Norway game showed how much we miss Ince, and I think he's right.
We would have wasted Norway if we'd had Ince. 8-) Yeah, right.

On Sunday I read an article in the Observer in which John Fashanu claimed that he
was absolutely that England would have a black Captain before too long, and that
it would probably be Paul Ince. Cor, is he a mindreader or what?

Mike
129.556Van Basten, Guillit, Rijkaard are no longer class players eh!!!!!!!!KBOMFG::TANNERCalifornian Girls are more fun!!!!!Tue Jun 08 1993 19:3527
 Re Dom....

    Dom don't forget that Holland haven't fielded their full team since Euro 92.
In fact in the game against Poland most of them were missing. Most Knowledgeable
football fans would agree with me that Van Basten is one of the most deadly
strikers around at the moment. He just returned a month ago after been out for
three months. Do you honestly believe that Palmer or Batty would get on the
English team if Rijkaard was English??? If you believe that then England may end
up getting a "wild card" for the States because of some war or whatever.....

   You also compared Dino Baggio to the likes of Batty and Palmer, I hope he 
doesn't find that out!!!! He alone scored three goals for Juve against Dortmund
in the UEFA cup final, and finished second highest scorer for Juve in the whole
competition after his namesake Roberto.

   When Holland field their full strength team with the above mentioned and also
Koemann, and probably Roy, Winter, and Wittschke then we should see one of the
best footballing teams in action again. Another aspect missing from the Holland
team is motivation, something Iam sure Cruyff would sort out....  

   Ok Dom I hope this satisfies your queries.....

                                                         -dave-

P.s Ton or any other Dutch fan out there, what is the probable lineup for 
    tomorrow nights big match?????
129.557Orange-tinted spectacles?KEEGAN::TURNERTue Jun 08 1993 20:2667
    re: .556
    
    Dave,
    
    >Dom don't forget that Holland haven't fielded their full team since Euro 
    >92.
    
    Nor have England. (Pearce, Shearer, Gascoigne, Ince, Wright, Dorigo,
    Ferdinand et al have all missed matches...oops, I forgot - the English
    aren't allowed to make excuses, are they?)
    
    >Most Knowledgeable football fans would agree with me that Van Basten is
    >one of the most deadly strikers around at the moment. He just returned
    >a month ago after been out for three months.
    
    Couldn't agree more, but he'll now be undergoing another operation on
    his ankle and it remains to be seen whether he ever *fully* recovers.
    Certainly, he wasn't the player of old in the European Cup final.
    
    >Do you honestly believe that Palmer or Batty would get on the English team
    >if Rijkaard was English??? 
    
    I didn't compare them with Rijkaard; I compared them (as "workhorses")
    with Wouters. And yes, I think Batty is better than Wouters in most
    departments, with the exception of shooting...and elbowing. As for 
    Rijkaard, I haven't seen him play three good games this year here in Italy.
    Great player 2 years ago; at Wembley, he was a ghost. Gullit wasn't even 
    that. 
    
   >You also compared Dino Baggio to the likes of Batty and Palmer, I hope he 
   >doesn't find that out!!!! He alone scored three goals for Juve against 
    >Dortmund in the UEFA cup final, and finished second highest scorer for 
    >Juve in the whole competition after his namesake Roberto.
    
    Granted football's all about scoring, but I do recall that a couple of
    years back, Man Utd's top scorer (or second top) on the way to winning
    the European Cup Winners' Cup was Steve Bruce. Enough said? I recently
    saw Dino Baggio struggle for Italy against Switzerland before being
    sent off for an outrageous tackle.
    
   >When Holland field their full strength team with the above mentioned and 
    >also Koemann, and probably Roy, Winter, and Wittschke then we should see 
    >one of the best footballing teams in action again. Another aspect missing 
    >from the Holland team is motivation, something Iam sure Cruyff would sort 
    >out....  
       
    Well, count Roy out for a start; the Dutch manager has said he
    considers him to be too "lilly-livered" for international football.
    Winter? Excellent player? Koemann? Great going forward, disastrous in
    defence. Wittschke? Mediocrity City, Arizona!
    
    As I said, Gullit feels he can't produce the goods at international
    level any more (Keown didn't give him a kick at Wembley) and has decided to
    retire from international football. Note that Gullit, Rijkaard and Van
    Basten have all said at various times that playing for Holland under 
    Advocaat (sp?) is *not* a joyful experience and do not like the way
    the team is playing. 
    
    And, if you recall, my original query was about your saying that
    Holland play spectacular football. Well, they certainly used to...
    
    Dom
    
    P.S. None of which will stop you being delighted if Holland win
    tomorrow - but I doubt if champagne football's got anything to do with
    it.
                             
129.558XSTACY::MDUNPHYJust another Day!!Tue Jun 08 1993 22:176
	Is the Norway Holland game Live on any English TV Station??
	If not will there be highlights

Thanks
	Mick
129.559A whole team of them !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Wed Jun 09 1993 00:219
    
> ...oops, I forgot - the English aren't allowed to make excuses, are they?
    
    What do you mean ? The English excuse for a manager has chosen a whole
    team of excuses as players ! (Well almost)
    
    Come on Ye Orange's !
    
    An Impartial Celt.
129.560Possibly RTL-4....GYMAC::DCASSIDYWed Jun 09 1993 15:2014
    
    The best bet for seeing the game might be for anyone with a Satellite
    dish and RTL-4 which is on Astra (transponder 13). They have shown all
    of Holland's previous matches.
    Looks like tonight will be busy in front of the box
    6:00	Latvia v Ireland
    8:00 	Holland v Norway
    12:00	US v England....
    
    Lucky its a day's holiday tomorrow here in Germany...
     
    Regards,
    
    Dezzz.
129.561HOLLAND HOLLAND HOLLANDUTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funWed Jun 09 1993 15:3037
this is the most likely line-up for tonight (not my line-up mind you)


                        de Goey


van Gobbel              Koeman               de Boer

			Rijkaard


Jonk			Bergkamp	     Wouters


Overmars		Bosman		     Blinker


I personally would have played van Vossen and Bergkamp up front,
Jonk in the middle of midfield, Wouters on the right en Witschge
on the left and would certainly not have played van Gobbel at
left back but preferred de Wolf.

subs:

Snelders, van Vossen, Winter, Witschge, de Wolf

VAn BAsten is again out with the same ankle injury and will have an operation 
again, hope he won't follow Gullit :-((

When Holland qualifies for the US, Cruijff wil take over from Advocaat.

I've got a ticket for tonight (the best seats for free and even tickets for
the party after the game, just a matter of having the right connections I guess)
, so I'll be off early today.


T_
129.562Wish I were there !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Wed Jun 09 1993 15:588
    
>I've got a ticket for tonight (the best seats for free and even tickets for
>the party after the game, just a matter of having the right connections I guess)
>, so I'll be off early today.
    
 	You lucky lucky basta'd ! ( Copywrite 'Life of Brian')
    
    An Impartial Celt.
129.563TV tonight in EnglandFORTY2::ASHGrahame Ash @REOWed Jun 09 1993 16:317
ITV is showing 'football' tonight at 2240. Unfortunately, it looks as if 
they're going to concentrate on USA v England (KO 2300), but we might get 5 
mins each of the Irish and Dutch/Norwegian games before it. 

I am an English supporter but I'd rather see a real game . . .

grahame
129.564Taylor now in the proverbial "No Win" situationTRUCKS::SANTThis is as good as it gets!Wed Jun 09 1993 18:236
    
    	Yup, England's latest debacle will be screened I think live,
    	whereas the majority of football followers would rather see
    	a game that matters.
    
    	Andy.
129.565FORTY2::FOWLERMFinishing's not his strong pointWed Jun 09 1993 20:5816
Nah. I'd rather watch England even if they are lousy.

Anything else is just being a fair-weather fan (or exhibiting common sense).

I think we'll win this one 3-0, with people like Batty being especially important
in kicking the "not especially physical" Americans off the ball.

There are no Italian-based types playing, so expect it to be fast and physical 
on our part: Taylor to return to the tactics that did him so well at Lincoln, 
Watford, and Villa.

And if we don't win.... I'll eat my hat. 8-)

Again.

Mike
129.566one upDBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Wed Jun 09 1993 21:183
    Aldo has scored after 15 mins
    
    Latvia 0-1 Ireland.
129.567That's what I heard...CLARID::KREYERAndre KREYER - ValbonneThu Jun 10 1993 01:596
	For what it is worth....

	Holland 0 - 0 Norway

				.Andre.
129.568Miracles happenOSLACT::HENRIKWGood news is a bad omenThu Jun 10 1993 12:0414
    > For what it is worth....
    >
    > Holland 0 - 0 Norway
    
    To Norway, it's worth a lot! :^) Especially since Holland
    outplayed us completely in the first half. This was a different
    ballgame altogether, after the victory over a weak English team.
    
    I feel sorry for the Dutch, though, who came as close to scoring
    as you'll ever do. Several times. A cold comfort may be that Norway 
    at least didn't get a lucky goal like the one at Wembley. The result is
    unfair as it is. So the one point is celebrated as a victory here.
    
    Henrik 
129.569Free ticket, free beer, lousy gameUTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funThu Jun 10 1993 12:2322
rep -1

Henrik,

it was also celebrated as a victory by the Norway supporters who followed the
team to Holland. The Dutch supporter incl myself were totally guttered, we
indeed outplay the Norwegians the first half and Bosman should at least scored
two goals but failed in front of an open goal.

The second half was a damn shame for the Dutch and the only good players then
where van Gobbel, Rijkaard and Overmars.

I got home quite late 'cause the beer was free in the place we were after the
game (it's always nice to have contacts with big sponsors :-))) and I must admit
I was quite p*ssed too :-))

Holland now has to win their remaining three matches wich will be very difficult
but if they keep playing the way they did yesterday they don't deserve to go to
the US of A.

T_

129.570THE BAD GET WORSEMACNAS::SMORANThu Jun 10 1993 12:245
    Mike,
           Do you want salt for your HAT
    
    USA  2  0  England 
    
129.571Very SadSUBURB::GROOMNBring back Poll TaxThu Jun 10 1993 12:5930
    
    Two fine finishes from the U.S. team beat a hopless England outfit.  For
    me the only player who shone was Gary Pallister whose timely
    interventions on several occasions prevented certain goals.  The team
    looks knackered and bereft of ideas (as I am after staying up to watch
    it) Graham Taylor admitted it was a 'low point' in his career, I
    suggest he resigns before he becomes unemployable.
    
    Ian Wright missed three sitters, Barnes (was he playing), Sharp had
    little service, Ince was workmanlike but appeared burdened by his new
    responsibility.  Palmer looked promising and Walker when he came on
    didn't.  Woods might have got to the corner first but otherwise did no
    wrong.  Batty should have had a penalty towards the end of the first
    half.
    
    All in all, another nail in Taylor's coffin (there can't be much room
    for many more).  England are sadly missing a true replacement for
    Lineker, I guess it's a little sad that Shearer's been missing for the
    majority of the season, but it's sadder that he appears to be the only
    one capable of filling Nice Gary's boots.  England also missed the
    Michelin man and Platt, both who recently have appeared out of sorts
    (especially Gassa), again though it's worrying that we are so reliant
    upon these two performing, there again nothing has really changed as it
    was only a few years ago that the team relied almost singularly upon
    Captain Robbo the Marvelous.
    
    All spout I'm afraid, no real suggestionsm, where to now ?
    
    
    Nev.
129.572What odds England to qualify?GALVIA::SPAINTaylor must STAYThu Jun 10 1993 13:1814
    
    I didn't see either of last night's games.  However the Dutch result
    was good news for England.  A draw in Rotterdam may now suffice.  Okay on
    current form you wouldn't back England to get a draw in San Marino but
    come the Autumn things could be very different.
    
    Anyone know what odds the bookies are giving this morning on England
    qualifying?
    
    Norway should now be safe enough.  Holland look suspect and Poland now
    appear to be in the driving seat for the second spot.  I still have
    doubt sabout the Poles though.
    
    Gary.
129.573PLUNDR::LOWEGYou don't want to do it like that!!Thu Jun 10 1993 13:226
    
    
    Only thing worth saying is that David Batty last night did what Gazza
    is supposed... Well done David..
    
    g.
129.574Are going to the Boston Tea Party?YUPPY::PATEMANScuba Dive in my Think TankThu Jun 10 1993 13:3331
    Was it really worth staying up until 1am for this?!?!
    
    As one of the R5 guys said this morning - who else is there? Shearer
    will add some class when he is fit, as will Platt and a fit Gascoigne,
    but we are leaking goals at a frightening rate. Atkinson's comment
    about getting back to defenders who defend rather than act as wingers
    has a lot of merit. We also need some stability. 
    
    There seems to be this theory that we have to play differently as
    England than in the League (Coppell said that Wright was not at all in
    tune with league style when he got back from England) Why don't we just
    play to our strengths?
    
    A flat back 4. A ball winner and a skill player in the centre of
    midfield and two wide players who can cross, and a settled pair of goal
    scorers up front.
    
    For all that - Ian Wright would have had at least a hat-trick in an
    Arsenal or Palace shirt last night - he looked scared to try things.
    Taylor cannot be blamed for injuries and a weak squad but he must take
    the rap for formations and motivation. 
    
    Assuming everybody was fit in the autumn how about:
    				Seaman (or Martyn)
    		Jones	Bruce		Pallister	Pearce
    		Platt	Ince		Gascoigne	Salako
    			Shearer		Wright
    
    Looks a little more solid than last nights mob.
    
    Paul 
129.575Go Go Go Go !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Thu Jun 10 1993 13:3613
    
    Oh what a shame !
    
    I will not gloat over such a result. I just feel sorry for all of those
    misguided English fans who lived in the false hope that the Norway
    result was a once off. TAYLOR MUST GO ! Even if they do manage to win
    their next two matches it can not hide the incompetence of that fool.
    The players are there for you to have a decent team (not a great one)
    but how can players who have little or no respect for a manager ever
    gel into a competitive unit. 
    
    An Impartial Celt.
    
129.576the Taylor and AngstyESSB::BREEThu Jun 10 1993 13:3727
    
    England may have been very bad last night but I think the U.S. looked
    like a very good team. They had a lot of skill going forward and did
    not shirk anything in the tackle.
    
    They could be a real threat in the W.C. because they are unlikely to be
    burdened with expectation and hopefully will have the confidence to
    push it around.
    
    It was good to see the Manchester United contingent doing well. Surely
    Pallister gets the nod over Adams now?
    
    For England, they've got to get Taylor out now. He's a nice guy but
    what they need is someone independent of the F.A. blazers. Without
    harping on about our success, Charlton does precisely what he wants
    with the team and the F.A.I. officials are there to see that the
    pitches are lined and the jerseys washed. 
    
    Hence there is no conflict of interest and no need to create a press
    image. The only image needed is a that of a winning team playing to its
    strengths.
    
    Forget about looking for good press coverage. If you get the results
    the press coverage will follow appropriately.
    
    Paul
    
129.577TRUCKS::SANTThis is as good as it gets!Thu Jun 10 1993 13:3816
    
    	Sheesh......embarassed isn't the word for it....
    
    	I think despair might be.
    
    	Have we become a second-rate footballing country at national
    	level? Our league is strong, but the English national side
    	looks so short on quality. People rave about Clough (jnr),
    	but all he does is a basic skill - pass the ball accurately
    	to feet. Even against the USA he looked slow and out of his
    	depth. Barnes...words fail me. Palmer was awful as a centre-half
    	imo. Pallister saved us from a more humiliating scoreline.
    	Wright had at least three clear chances and missed them all.
    	Enough said.
    
    	Andy.
129.578the pea is very underrated vegetable..ESSB::BREEThu Jun 10 1993 13:403
    I think Norman Lamont should take over the team. 
    
    Paul
129.579Were they Playing to get rid of Taylor?GVA05::BURKHALTERThu Jun 10 1993 13:521
    
129.580England : Worst team in int. footballPLUNDR::MORANDANGER: Volatile Database on the LooseThu Jun 10 1993 14:0433
    
>   England may have been very bad last night but I think the U.S. looked
>   like a very good team. They had a lot of skill going forward and did
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Boll*cks! The US looked like a fairly mediocre international side, 
    but certainly did have good athletes with patches of good technical 
    ability throughout the team. They were not too bad going forward but they 
    were pretty poor defensively, making loads of mistakes and giving the 
    English forwards more space than they've had in the last 5 internationals 
    put together (I don't mean to be disrespectful to the Americans). 
    Unfortunately, England were far worse than the Americans and I can't see 
    half of that team ever playing for England again. They were a disgrace
    and should be doing hard time in Parkhurst for that performance. It's 
    baffling how this team has sunk to the depths so quickly after looking a 
    half decent side in Italia '90. 
    
    I think it's time for Taylor to go. He obviously can't motivate good
    club players when it comes to pulling on an England shirt. Other
    personnel I'd like to see go are Woods (couldn't catch a cold), Dixon 
    (he was our best attacking option yesterday and he can't pass!), 
    Palmer (not international quality), Clough (showed yesterday once and
    for all that he's not good enough), Barnes (he's had too many 2nd
    chances already and will never get the same amount of space to not
    perform in, that he had yesterday) and Dixon (again!!- he's that bad).
    
    Positive points: 1) it was a friendly.
    		     2)	Pallister and Batty, both played well
    		     3) Holland drew.
    		     4) Last time we lost to the US, we won the world cup
    			16 years later!!! ;-) 
    
    Tim                                              
129.581FORTY2::FOWLERMFinishing's not his strong pointThu Jun 10 1993 14:1818
Oh bo***cks.

Words fail me. Except for a few obvious four-letter ones.

How could we lose to the US? It's like them losing to us at Baseball or 
something.

I agree with the team selection a few notes ago: come in Steve Bruce, your 
country needs you. 

Meanwhile, why doesn't Taylor give Earl Barrett a go. He can't do any worse than
the pack of donkeys he fielded last night. drop the whole team, that's what I 
say.

Good news about Holland dropping a point, but what chance have we got of getting
a point in Holland and beating Poland?

Mike
129.582God has a weird sense of humourSTKOFF::SPERSSONPas de problemeThu Jun 10 1993 14:3318
    
    Well,
    
    Congratulations (sort of) to Norway for getting another result,
    although they were (as expected) totally outplayed by an off-form
    reserve-studded Dutch team. Since it is now likely that Lucky Norway
    qualify, we temporarily lift them from the 3rd rate list where they
    belong. They'll be back there soon enough.
    
    USA - England 2-0  puts the "new Norwegian Super Team" somewhat in
    perspective doesn't it?
    
    Still, hope Norway get to the US, and that they end up in the same
    group as Sweden. We could use the points :-)
    
    cheers,
    
    	Stefan
129.583Hardly a miracleOSLACT::HENRIKWGood news is a bad omenThu Jun 10 1993 15:086
    >>   -< God has a weird sense of humour >-
    
    He sure has. Not only was Norway saved from humiliation yesterday,
    but He's even created Swedes. ;^)
    
    Henrik
129.584thats the way it goes...DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Thu Jun 10 1993 15:3816
    I would truly hate to be an England supporter right now. It must be so
    embarassing. I dont agree that the players are at fault. These are (in
    the main) the team that performed well up to and including Italia '90.
    
    I think Taylor's management is at fault, plain and simple.
    
    England were outclassed last night, in the basics of the
    game...control, passing, vision, ability to take their chances.
    They are a frightened team.
    
    Fair play to the USA, they took their chances really well. Their
    supporters were vociferous and appreciative. Their play may have been a
    little naive at times, but the game needs a lot less cynicism and a bit
    more naivete. Well done.
    
    *Tiger*
129.585PEKING::COSSEYNThu Jun 10 1993 16:0010
    
    Well, we've been embarressed for the second game on the trot, nothing
    much more to say, the U.S.A took there chances England didn't. Another
    day Wright could have had three but failed against some inspired
    goalkeeping and poor finishing. Looking to Sunday we need to improve
    drastically to get any sort of result but I can't see this slump lasting
    to long and there's no better side to get back to winning ways against
    than the Brazilians. 
    
    Neil.. 
129.586Remember 1950!XSTACY::JLUNDON@GAO 822-4715 Apathy is the most terrible vice!Thu Jun 10 1993 16:130
129.587NO!!PEKING::COSSEYNThu Jun 10 1993 16:312
    
    
129.588In those days it was a shock :-)GALVIA::SPAINTaylor must STAYThu Jun 10 1993 16:367
    
    Re -2,
    
    showing your age James.  :-)
    
    
    Gary.
129.589John Atyeo RIPGALVIA::SPAINTaylor must STAYThu Jun 10 1993 16:4012
    
    probably not the right topic
    
    John Atyeo died suddenly on Tuesday.  He was an English International
    in the 50s who played with West Brom and Bristol City (I think anyone 
    else?).
    
    He's best remembered by Irish fans for a famous last gasp equaliser in
    Dalymount that sent England to Sweden rather than Ireland for the 1958
    world cup. 
    
    Gary. 
129.590Swedes - a godsend ????OSL09::NWO506::ARNEKNever trust a pretty interaceThu Jun 10 1993 16:4311
re. 583

>>    He sure has. Not only was Norway saved from humiliation yesterday,
>>    but He's even created Swedes. ;^)

You should be careful implying that Swedes are created by God, Henrik. I 
know that God supposedly acts in mysterious ways, but creating Swedes
is not merely mysterious, it's plain and simple cruelty! :-)

--arne
129.591Hang on a minute !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Thu Jun 10 1993 17:0610
    
    Wo ! Between the Irish/Scots and the English and the Norwegians and the
    Swedes we are really getting racist here. Just wait till the Dutch and
    the Danes tune in. A regular volcano of national identity just waiting to
    errupt. What have we started here ? How can we live with this monster
    which has been created ?
    
    Keep it up Lads !
    
    An Impartial Celt.
129.592PLUNDR::MORANDANGER: Volatile Database at largeThu Jun 10 1993 17:577
    
    Just read that a sports shop in Alnwick, Northumberland is giving aways 
    free England strips with each turnip purchased (or should that be vice
    versa?). Sales are booming. It's good to see that we still have a sense of 
    humour.
    
    Tim 
129.593Alex Stewart in goal???FORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTAThu Jun 10 1993 18:0024
I, like a fool, stayed up to watch last night. I thought that the game on the
whole was open and flowing and felt I was entertained. However, entertaining
though it was, the standard was closer to the GM Vauxhall Conference than the
international arena.

I for was was quietly happy about the result as my father is American, but I
was thoroughly disappointed by the English display. The players weren't 
interested and as someone on the commentary team said, they should have been
sunning themselves on a beach in Majorca, relaxing after a long hard season.

I hope, for English International football's sake, that England get absolutely
trounced by both Brazil & Germany. Surely, the F.A. will have to then do
something about Taylor if he still won't quit. A new manager is definitely a must
now as there is still a glimmer of hope for qualification next year after last
nights 0-0 draw.

One of my colleagues just suggested that we fly the cricket team to Boston, and
bring the football team home to face Australia next week. Surely the results
couldn't be any worse ;-)

I for one am looking forward to saturday afternoon when England take on Germany,
at schoolboy level. These games are usually full of flair and excitement.

Al
129.594Woking SupporterKERNEL::WITHALLGNever heard of himFri Jun 11 1993 13:5611
    
    
  >>  the standard was closer to the GM Vauxhall Conference than the
      international arena.
    
    
      Steady  :-), Some people happen to like GM club football.
    
    
      Gary
                 
129.595Not that it matters to England, but ....FUTURS::ROWELLConquistador, in search of goldFri Jun 11 1993 14:1232
    
    
    Current Group Two Standings
    
    
                 P  W  D  L  F  A  Pts
    Norway.....  7  5  2  0  20  3  12
    England....  7  3  3  1  16  6   9
    Holland....  7  3  3  1  17  8   9
    Poland.....  5  3  2  0   8  3   8
    Turkey.....  8  1  1  6   7 17   3
    San Marino.  8  0  1  7   1 32   1
    
    
    Remaining Matches:
    
    Sept  8:	England v Poland
    
    Sept 22:	San Marino v Holland
    		Norway v Poland
    
    Oct  13:	Holland v England
    		Poland v Norway
    
    Oct  27:	Turkey v Poland
    
    Nov  10:	Turkey v Norway
    
    Nov  16:	San Marino v England
    
    Nov  17:	Poland v Holland	
                                
129.596Could this be four defeats on the trot????!!!!!!KBOMFG::TANNERCalifornian Girls are more fun!!!!!Fri Jun 11 1993 17:3711
    After watching the Brazil v Germany game last night, I reckon the US cup
will turn out to be similiar to Euro 88 ie three games and three defeats.... 

   England were crap, but the states played with a lot of heart, and fully
deserved their result. Two aspects of the game that stood out in my eyes were
1) The performance of Miolta sp! in goals... and
2) The tackle on Tom Dooley which could have smashed his leg up. He was replaced
    but I don't know what the injury is.

                                                                    -dave-
129.597Poles apartREOSV1::ONEILLSSat Jun 12 1993 03:396
    Do I get the impression that a team one point behind the might of
    Holland and England with two games on hand,  two home games to come,
    and that have only once ever lost a home game in the WC are perceived
    as inferior?  Where's my local Corals/Ladbrokes? 
    
    Shane
129.598Taylor a hero???KIRKTN::GDOUGALLG'DAY COBBER!!!Mon Jun 14 1993 00:452
         Brazil 1  England 1
           ??       Platt
129.599Taylor on courseESSB::BREEMon Jun 14 1993 12:338
    re:598
    
    This result certainly confirms that England have shaken off the bad
    breaks of the past few weeks and re-establishes them as one of the 
    world's greatest teams.
    
    Paul
    
129.600A turn up for the booksREPROT::BIGBJJ::SWAINMI was only asleep....Mon Jun 14 1993 13:385
So how was their performance or did England hang on for a fluky draw?

One of the worlds greatest teams ? mmm..... I have my doubts.

Matt.
129.601FORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTAMon Jun 14 1993 13:507
re .599

Paul you forgot all those smileys ;-)

However, yesterday's match was a vast improvement over the last few weeks.

Al
129.602OUR BOYS BASH BRAZIL.!DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Mon Jun 14 1993 14:5138
    
    England can hold their heads high again. With Manager Lord Graham
    Taylor epitomising the English spirit of "never say die", standing at
    the prow of his ship as it heaved and battled against the vicious
    onslought of a storm of derision.
    
    The team did everyone proud, they battled mightily against the slick
    and cynical Brazilians and scored a well deserved goal just before
    half-time. Sinton flicked over an inch perfect cross and good old David
    Platt rose higher than any Amazonian Rain Forest to direct a smashing
    header directly onto the post , where the goalie finished it off by
    banging it over the line with his shoulder.
    
    The second half gave Our Boys a great chance to show what brave
    campaigners they are, as the Brazilian Hurricane pounded the Coastal
    ramparts of the English defence. Time and Time again, super-hero Des
    Walker (The man who is faster than Linford Christie) outsprinted the
    ballet-like Brazilians to get in decisive tackles. Tony Dorigo held to
    his post, despite nearly being washed away by the advancing tide of
    Brazilian Blue. Indeed, on many ocassions England broke clear to
    threaten the South American's goal, only to be denied by scathing
    tackles and underhand shirt-pulling. It was almost like when Argentina
    visited Wembley back in 196n, cynical tactics, always when the ref
    wasnt looking etc. 
    
    As the sun rose higher and favoured the Brazilians, our boys began to
    feel the pain of the heat, and the effects of having to play 750 games
    each last season. The Amazonians broke through down the right, and
    forced the ball home. England battled on supremely over the last 15
    minutes to secure a thrilling draw, one which will put them in great
    heart for the next game against Germany.
    
    On the basis of this performance, England must be favourites to hit the
    Krauts for six, and to take the World Cup in style for the next 20
    years.
    
    =====================================================================
    filed - 13-June-1993, 21:00 GMT....copies to Ed. and my aunt Silvia....
129.603NOT !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Mon Jun 14 1993 14:5720
    
    Oh! Yes . England have SCORED !!!!!!!!!!!  (Why the surprise Brain ?)
    
    What a turaround. The mighty England last night showed that they *are*
    the best team in the world. They won 1-1 against Brazil. Where's my hat
    so I can eat it ? Oh what a preformance. That cultured header by
    Plattie whizzed passed the outstreached arms of a flailing Brazilian
    keeper. The keeper had no chance. True class ! And as for that
    equalizer, well 'nuf said. A fluke if ever saw one. England deserved to
    win ! They had a right to win. It's just not bloody fair that they
    weren't alloed to win. It's their ball and they're going home unless
    somebody allows them to win.
    I hope all of you out there who were calling for the head of the great
    and glorious manager Mr. Taylor are rightly ashamed and fully prepared
    to enter an apology to all of us who have always had complete faith in
    that genius of world football. Yes Mr. Taylor I love you and I'm sorry.
    
     England, World Champions '94.
    
    An Impartial Celt.
129.604re:602 Brilliant !!!!!!ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Mon Jun 14 1993 15:021
    
129.605we'll meet again when there's blue birds over...ESSB::BREEMon Jun 14 1993 15:484
    I heard Graham Taylor was seen out celebrating last night with Vera
    Lynn.
    
    Paul
129.606England beat the boys from BrazilUNTADH::WILCOCKSONBack in SchlagrahmlandMon Jun 14 1993 17:4611
    
    Thank god for that! - So England ARE the best team in the world after all,
    and all this nonsense about Sir Graham T is been shown up for what it
    really is - bolshy tosh!
    
    C'mon you English chappys (Irish, Welsh and Scots included here of
    course), all together...
    
    Land of hope and glory,
    Mother of the free...
    
129.607TRUCKS::SANTThis is as good as it gets!Mon Jun 14 1993 18:319
    
    	Well I didn't watch the game, but having just read a few cynical
    	tributes in here hardly feel as if I've missed anything.
    
    	So we're crap, but it's Quality crap 8-)
    	
    	A-genuinly-impartial-Englishman-who-doesn't-get-upset-by-racist- 
    	colonials-obsessed-with-doing-us-down ;-)
    
129.608C'Mon England...C'Mon England...DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Mon Jun 14 1993 19:168
    re -1....
    
    We're not rascist...and we're certainly not colonials...8^)
    
    Tiger$The-Wild-Colonial-Boy.
    
    I think we should start up our own gutter-paper...oh hang on , the
    first two words of that sentence excludes me from working there....
129.609Well, you're certainly not colonials...KEEGAN::TURNERMon Jun 14 1993 19:238
    
>    I think we should start up our own gutter-paper...oh hang on , the
>    first two words of that sentence excludes me from working there....
    
    Oh, I dunno! Just call it "The Dublin Post" and I think (allow me!) we can
    turn a blind eye...
    
    Dom
129.610Oh Lord its hard to be humble ....FUTURS::ROWELLConquistador, in search of goldMon Jun 14 1993 19:267
    
     Whats this ?????
    
    No mention of the U21 result ????
    
    ;)
    Wayne
129.611Wot no xenophobic comment?PLUNDR::MORANDANGER: Volatile Database at largeMon Jun 14 1993 19:328
    
    Wrong topic, but seen as someone's already mentioned it, but does
    anyone know when the final of the Toulon U21 is, and is it on TV?
    
    Tim.
    
    Ps. Congrats to Scotland for getting so far in the tournement. It bodes
    well for the full team.
129.612nothing like a smile..eh?DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Mon Jun 14 1993 19:529
    attaboy, Dom...humour in the face of adversity, stiff upper lip 'n' all
    that.
    
    You'll go far, my lad..
    
    8^)
    
    *Tiger*$seeing-the-funny-side-of-life..
    
129.613Run along now!KEEGAN::TURNERMon Jun 14 1993 20:0316
    re: .612
    
    Now, now - you know I'm only trying to keep you away from your Jimmy
    Hill videos and the piles of tabloids you all have delivered to your
    door.
    
    Smile? We can hardly contain ourselves! That 1-1 draw with Brazil seems
    to be causing more sleepless nights in Dublin than the Blitz ever did
    in London.
    
    Still, yer gorra laff ain't yer!
    
    Dom
    
    P.S. Shouldn't you be out celebrating that 2-0 demolition of Latvia
    like the rest of 130?
129.614Ah sure ! We'll stay for the Party :-)ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Mon Jun 14 1993 21:0216
    
    
    
    
    re:613
    
    We only celebrate our success for a limited period i.e until our next
    success, this Wednesday.
    But if you've been celebrating and living in hope since 1966 you may not 
    understand this phenomenon.
    
    Well I'll bet Germany are shaking in their boots ! Celebrate a
    theoretical victory while you have the chance. It may be a long time 
    before the opportunity comes around again.
    
    An Impartial Celt.
129.615ho hoFORTY2::ETHERIDGEPhhhff! Well good luck!Mon Jun 14 1993 21:355
	ESSB::PHAYDEN seems to have quietened the activity of the English
	noters in this topic, by cunningly boring the crap out off us. 
	Well done!

	Ian.
129.616About as cunning as Attila the Hun!KEEGAN::TURNERMon Jun 14 1993 21:4515
    
	>ESSB::PHAYDEN seems to have quietened the activity of the English
	>noters in this topic, by cunningly boring the crap out off us. 
	                          ^^^^^^^^^
        >Well done!

    "Cunning (adj.) Shrewd or crafty in manipulation..." (American Heritage 
    dictionary).
    
    Naah, I don't think so somehow.
    
    But as they never stop telling all and sundry, they're "such a noice,
    quiet, friendly peeple", so I guess we can forgive them.
    
    Dom
129.617Who rattled your cage?SIOG::FITZPATRICKMon Jun 14 1993 21:5122
>>                     <<< Note 129.616 by KEEGAN::TURNER >>>
>>                    -< About as cunning as Attila the Hun! >-


>>Note 129.542              World Cup qualifying Group 2                542 of 616
>>KEEGAN::TURNER                                      106 lines   4-JUN-1993 15:01
>>                             -< A few reflections >-

>>Well, I've been read-only in this conference for a long while now. I used to
>>participate in the old FOOTBALL conference but I've been loathe to do so in
>>this one, largely through lack of time and, quite frankly, because of the
>>feeling of boredom aroused by so many so-called football fans who are unable to
>>watch a game from a neutral point-of-view but have to resort to provoking those
>>who support a different team from them while defending the dubious merits of
>>their own team. Note 129 is the example to end all examples.

Well Dom,
	Welcome to note 129. You're really getting into the swing of things.
Glad to see you found the time!

Cheers,
Michael.
129.618Apathy = Boredom ?ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Tue Jun 15 1993 13:4913
    
    Ian my firend,
    
    Please don't try to flatter me. There is little I could do which could 
    bore the English noters any more than they already are.
    Maybe the reason for the lack of notes is... SHAME ! It's strange, but
    when your team are winning no one can shut you up, and yet, when you are
    loosing, I can. 
    It's apathy not boredom which has stifled your literary flow of verbal 
    diarrhoea (There are exceptions of course) so as much as I would like
    it, please don't credit me with such a triumph.
    
    An Impartial Celt.
129.619PLUNDR::LOWEGYou don't want to do it like that!!Tue Jun 15 1993 13:5512
    
    
    re .618
    
    
    Yaaaaaaawn
    
    
    
    ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
    
    
129.620PLUNDR::MORANDANGER: Volatile Database at largeTue Jun 15 1993 14:029
    
    It's bloody murder being an England fan in here. If they win, you
    daren't put a note in for fear of getting accused of having overtly 
    nationalistic tendancies; if they lose you daren't put in a note in for 
    fear of being accused of being a bad loser and if you don't put a note in 
    whether they win, lose or draw, you get accused of being apathetic and
    disinterested.
    
    Sick and tired of Newcastle.
129.621Ya can wake up now Gary!!!!!KBOMFG::TANNERCalifornian Girls are more fun!!!!!Tue Jun 15 1993 14:036
Re .619...

    Jasus Gary wake up, Englerand are na playing untill saturday. So ya can wake
up and do a weeks work before ya go back to sleep on saturday......:)

                                                                 -dave-
129.622re: 620 C'est la vie !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Tue Jun 15 1993 15:551
    
129.623C'Mon Over to my place...DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Tue Jun 15 1993 16:3710
    You are all cordially invited over to 130 for a few drinks, a bit of a
    chat and some good decent slaggin', where no-one gets unnecessarily
    huffed over anything.
    
    I Thought Dom's 130.281 was excellent, nearly, almost as witty as
    129.602....
    
    8^)
    
    *Tiger*
129.624A bit of friendly banter in this stressful world.KEEGAN::TURNERTue Jun 15 1993 16:5915
    >You are all cordially invited over to 130 for a few drinks, a bit of a
    >chat and some good decent slaggin', where no-one gets unnecessarily
    >huffed over anything.
    
    Tiger, I now know what people mean by "traditional Irish hospitality"!
    Hope you won't accuse me of gatecrashing, though...
    
    >I Thought Dom's 130.281 was excellent, nearly, almost as witty as
    >129.602....
    
    Hey, steady on! I've been living in Italy for nearly ten years now - 
    a bit of rustiness with the old mother tongue seems more than
    reasonable in the circumstances.
    
    Dom (and compliments for 129.602, you cheeky beggar!)
129.625SUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupTue Jun 15 1993 20:1510
129.626how stupid can a name get?SIOG::HANLONTue Jun 15 1993 20:274
129.627SUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupTue Jun 15 1993 20:418
129.629Git !SUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupTue Jun 15 1993 20:4811
129.631Cool down Bob could be looking in?XSTACY::JLUNDON@GAO 822-4715 Apathy is the most terrible vice!Tue Jun 15 1993 20:5610
re last few

For F**K sake cool down.  You are wasting everyones time with this absolute 
rubbish boths sides are going on about.  If Palmer every wanted a reason for 
closing down employee related notesfiles then all he has to do to prove his
point is look in here.

Back to normal business...

                            James.
129.632NobheadSUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupTue Jun 15 1993 20:589
129.633TIME OUT !FUTURS::ROWELLConquistador, in search of goldTue Jun 15 1993 21:0166
From note 2.2  8-AUG-1991

>       Some basic conference rules.
>	.
>	.
>       No foul or abusive language.
>	.
>       Please remember that this is a worldwide conference read by many
>       people of different races and creeds.

From note 2.24  4-FEB-1992 ( Ron Glover's message )


>    First, and most critically; the electronic mail systems and notes
>    files are company facilities subject to normal workplace rules of
>    conduct.   As such, the same rules that govern conduct and comment
>    in any other Digital workplace apply with equal weight in these
>    systems.  Stated simply, if you wouldn't say something in a
>    Digital business meeting, you shouldn't say it in electronic mail
>    or notes. PERIOD.

>    Statements that attribute improper, illegal or immoral motives or
>    actions to others; statements that cast aspersions on the
>    character or integrity of others or that amount to libel or
>    slander are not permitted. PERIOD.  In this regard, it does not
>    matter whether the individuals subject to the comment are elected
>    public officials or directors of organizations disfavored by the
>    author.   There is no "Public Figure" exception in these systems.

>    Comments of a sexual nature are not acceptable whether they are
>    about the author or directed at others.  Similarly, comments that
>    degrade, devalue or discriminate against others are also
>    prohibited.

From note 2.43  20-AUG-1992

>    This conference is for discussing football.  It is not to be used for
>    insulting opposing fans or opposing teams.
 
All these words and warnings, and still they are totally ignored by a small
section of the community. Do you people actually 'understand' these rules ?
Do you realize that calling a certain player a donkey, or claiming that a
certain player or team is crap violates these rules. Not even a "GOTCHA" 
note excuses violation of these rules. Try explaining "GOTCHA" to Ron Glover.

What surprises (and dismays) me, is the moderators who seem to ignore 
even the most blatant of infractions, preferring to wait for someone to
complain before any action is taken. I have seen an instance where a note
has been set hidden (quite rightly) because the p-name insulted a member of 
this conferance and yet a p-name exists with the *same* insult against a
certain football player, and those notes are unaffected. Hey, if one is wrong,
then so is the other.

If this is not checked, then it will not be long before this conference is
closed down. I, for one, do not want this to happen. Amid the dross in this
conference, there are constructive news and views that I appreciate reading, 
even if is detrimental to my teams. 

May I suggest that you all read the above mentioned notes fully, and ensure
that you understand them before you enter your next notes.

Kindest regards,
Wayne Rowell, 

           
129.634SUBURB::WAITEGANGER IS A GIFTTue Jun 15 1993 21:037
    Re 632
    
    Though I agree with what Baz is saying can we discuss football its more
    interesting!
    
    
    Gary
129.635XSTACY::MDUNPHYJust another Day!!Tue Jun 15 1993 21:059
	Whens England's next game???

	The Germans have been scoring frequently, so here's hoping for a good
	game.

	Hope Wright plays well

	An Impartial Arsenal Fan!!!
129.636SUBURB::WAITEGANGER IS A GIFTTue Jun 15 1993 21:097
    England play Germany on Thursday with a 7.00Pm kick-off.
    
    Should be a good match.  Germany look good in attack but weaker than
    normal in defence.
    
    
    Gary
129.638It's not what it seemsESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Tue Jun 15 1993 21:3519
    
    re: .633
    
    Look what you say is valid, to a point but the type of banter which has
    been going on, in this string, to date, is not malicious (as far as I
    can see). Neither is it bigotted or secterian, in the way the files of
    two particular scotish teams were. I'm not racist ! (as certain people 
    seem to think). If you would just calm down a little and take the notes in
    the light hearted manner in which they are intended and join in with
    some of the *friendly* banter you may enjoy it.
    Two cases in point. Tiger & Turner . Their stuff is brilliant and yet
    each take digs at the others teams. Read 129.602 & 130.281 !
    Every Irishman loves to rub it in when the English do badly (Except my
    *English* father who cheers England all the way, in any Tournament) . 
    
    It ain't malicious I assure you. Let's get back to football talk. O.K
    
    Peter. (An Impartial Celt)
             
129.639Are you sure?WELCLU::BROWNIThe Man who sold the WorldTue Jun 15 1993 22:076
    
    re: 637
    
    I thought England-Germany was on Saturday..........
    
    Ian (an impartial Brit!)
129.640Football here please.MOEUR1::SMITHWed Jun 16 1993 11:0023
    
    Wayne, thanks for that timely reminder, 
    
    re : .638 I think you should take your discussion someplace else, and
    leave this conference for soccer talk.
    
    >Look what you say is valid, to a point but the type of banter which has
    >been going on, in this string, to date, is not malicious (as far as I
    >can see). Neither is it bigotted or secterian, in the way the files of
    >two particular scotish teams were. I'm not racist ! (as certain people 
    >seem to think). If you would just calm down a little and take the notes in
    >the light hearted manner in which they are intended and join in with
    >some of the *friendly* banter you may enjoy it.
    
    If all you want to do is 'banter' with each other, you can use
    electronic mail, and not let everyone else in on it.  Also, one thing I 
    (I'm British) have learnt from working in France is that language can be
    easily misunderstood!  So, light-hearted conversations in English could
    well be misinterpreted by a person for whom English is not a 'fluent'
    language.
    
    Reagrds,
    Ian
129.641The game is on Saturday!!!!!KBOMFG::TANNERCalifornian Girls are more fun!!!!!Wed Jun 16 1993 12:457
   The game is on saturday, Iam not sure about the kickoff time I just know their
playing in the indoor stadium in Detroit. There's also a lot of hype going on
about the grass in the stadium, which they have been experimenting on for six
months. I juts hope we see alot of goals to keep up the interest in the states.

                                                                     -dave-
129.642There's a chance !ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Wed Jun 16 1993 13:3114
    
    The one thing you guys will want to watch is Klinsman taking dives like
    Greg Luganis all over the place. With the timing of Des Walkers
    tackling lately there will ample opportunity.
    The other guy to watch is obviously Riedler. Either Palister man-marks
    him or he's sure to knock a few in. That guy has some powerful header !
    
    Have to admit as has been said before, the German defence is brutal so
    you might be in with a chance if the England defence plays the way it
    did against Brazil. Having said that, if Wright is off form, again, the
    outlook looks bleak.
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt)
                                                                
129.643reasons to be cheerful..DBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Wed Jun 16 1993 13:5724
    Hi Guys...just woke up...both twins acting the goat last night...didnt
    get much sleep etc etc...
    
    For those who aint Irish, let me explain. Tadhg is Irish for Tim...my
    Dads name. I have been called "Tiger" since I was a kid...its
    handier I guess...even now, when I'm introduced to new people, they
    start calling me *Tiger* after a few hours. 
    
    I take it as a compliment. I do wash regularly and dont eat fresh
    Wildebeest for breakfast. To my friends, my twins, a boy and a girl,
    are collectively called.."Tiger-Cubs"...it goes on and on...the only
    person who dont call me "Tiger" is my wife...and is this is a public
    conference, I cant write down the name she most often calls me.
    
    Like Dom, I think that "Football" involves a lot more than just the
    game on the field. "Football" involves all the witty banter of the
    terraces and the pubs, the press and TV reports. It was in that light
    that we wrote such meisterpieces (ahem!) as we did.
    
    Personally, I cant envision Bob Palmer reading 129 or 130, but if he
    does, he is welcome. This conference grants us all a ray of sunshine in
    an increasingly difficult place to work.
    
    *Tiger*
129.644He's a gooner.ESSB2::SDUFFYWed Jun 16 1993 14:4017
re .643
>>    Personally, I cant envision Bob Palmer reading 129 or 130....

Taken from the football archives, vintage 1971, proof that Bob is a gooner ?

================================================================================
Note 12.243                     Arsenal F.C.                          243 of 420
FLARES::PALMERB "Purple haze, always in my brain"     5 lines  16-JUN-1971 12:07
                     -< Dig those groovy side burns man >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

	Wow man, where can I buy a pair of sideburns like Charlie George, 
	they're sooooo out of this world.

	B.P.
    
 er, only kidding Bob really.
129.645he heDBOT07::RUSSELLWEXFORD,ALL-IRELAND CHAMPIONS '93Wed Jun 16 1993 15:556
    re -1 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ....8^))))))))...really good that one..
    
    I dunno about him being a Gooner, but he's certainly given enough
    people the bullet....
    
    *Tiger*
129.646Toulon U-21 result.ESSB::PLYNCHWed Jun 16 1993 18:494
     RE: 610 & 611.
    
    	France 0 - 1 England (Flitcroft)
    
129.647GALVIA::SPAINTaylor must STAYFri Jun 18 1993 17:2918
    
    Re .633, It was a good note but I must take issue with some of the
    comments re moderators.
    
    We do not wait for somebody to complain.  I'm sick of setting notes
    hidden.  Sure we miss some.  sure there are inconcsistencies but this
    is not our full time jobs.  I try and snatch some time for notes
    whenever I can.  Many of the notes enteredt by JF, Dezzz and I are late
    at night or on weekends.  We just don't have time to read every note.
    I've set some notes hidden only after hving them pointed out to me by
    another noter.
    
    This conference is for discussing football and not for insulting other
    employees.  Some oif the comments in here are way over the top.  Most
    of the English and Irish fans here are just interested in football.
    Let's stick to discussing football.
    
    Gary.
129.648MACNAS::MATTHEWSTue Jun 22 1993 20:257
    Re .643
    
    Is Carlton Palmer any relation to Bob Palmer? If he is, then Bob may be 
    much more interested in this file than we all previously thought.
    
    John.
     
129.649Bob who??KURMA::RBERNARDI like ???Sat Jun 26 1993 04:215
    
    RE. -1
    
    Who is Bob Palmer.
    
129.650C'MON ENGLAND>>!!!!SIOG::DLUGAG::RUSSELLWexford All-Ireland Champions '94Tue Sep 07 1993 16:5313
Hi,

I see there have been no entries in this note for yonks...I wonder why??

Anyway, just thought I'd let you know that England are playing Poland 
tomorrow night at Wembley in a "vital, crucial" WC qualifier. 

I'd like to take this opportunity to wish them well. USA '94 wouldnt be the 
same without you.

luv,

*Tiger*
129.651Sh*t or bust...PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Sep 07 1993 17:0527
    
    Oh well, its make or brake tomorrow night. England play Poland at
    Wembley. England have to win, its as simple as that. Anything else and
    we wont be taking part in the World Cup next year in the States. The
    good news is Poland dont travel very well,and usually get beat at
    Wembley, (Apart from the obvious one).
    
    If we win, then we can go to Holland next month knowing we arent out of 
    it. What sort of performance can we expect tomorrow night ?, who knows
    under Taylor. If we play like we played against Holland at Wembley we
    will hammer Poland, but if we play like we played in most of the other
    internationals under this fool, then anything could happen.
    
    I'll be there, hoping to chear the lads (including Teddy) on to
    Victory. If we do manage to qualify, we've got to put up with Taylor 
    for another few years yet, and his unbeliavably bad tactics and team 
    selections. I would rather that though than not be in the States next
    year. In an Ideal world, we qualify, Taylor gets sacked and Terry
    Venables takes over and takes us to Glory nexy July, but what is more
    likely to happen is that we will scrape through on goal difference, go
    to the States under Taylor, without a right back, and put up with him
    bringing on defenders when we are 1-0 down to Zaire with ten minutes to
    go.
    
    Anyone know the team yet ?
    
    Dave...
129.652YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingTue Sep 07 1993 17:1216
    
    	Caught most of the team just now on the radio
    
    Seaman
    ??
    Adams
    Pallister
    Pearce
    Ince
    Gascoigne
    Sharpe
    Platt
    Ferdinand
    Wright
    
    		Tony B.
129.653PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Sep 07 1993 17:267
    
    What no Teddy Sheringham...???
    
    I paid 22 notes just to see Ready Steady Teddy spank the Poles, oh well
    Ferdinand isnt a bad player. 
    
    Dave...
129.654YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingTue Sep 07 1993 17:284
    
    	Rob Jones is the missing defender.
    
    	Tony B.
129.655I wouldn't be surprisedWOTVAX::GREENJAAndy GreenTue Sep 07 1993 17:292
    
    	Maybe he's the missing right back !
129.656PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURTue Sep 07 1993 18:4310
    
    I have no doubts that England will whup the Poles at Wembley tomorrow
    night. England are far to strong for this average Pole side, and
    I expect to see at least 4 or 5 goals from England.
    
    We dont have a bad side, thankfully injury has ruled out the worst
    right back in the country Lee Dixon. How did such a crap player ever
    get picked for England in the first place..
    
    Andy..B
129.657SUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupTue Sep 07 1993 19:0310
    RE BarefieldA 
    
    How did such a crap player ever get picked for England in the first place..
        
    
    **Just look at Dennis Wise and that is real crap in an England shirt.
    
    
    
    Baz
129.658Be happy if ye win 1-0KBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Tue Sep 07 1993 19:1611
  Anything less than a win for England tomorrow could mean "C'est La Vie"  The
Poles will more than likely play a defensive game and hope to grap a goal on 
the counter attack.... As regards Mr Barefield claiming ye'll win by five goals
well all I can is that you wont find too many genuine English fans that would
agree with that nonsense.  Replacing Walker with Adams is like replacing a 
Camel with a Donkey.... The present form of Man Utds three players should be a
big help, as for the fat kid, well Iam not sure how he's done so far for Lazio,
I just know they haven't scored a goal in their first two games.....

                                                                  -dave-
129.659PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURTue Sep 07 1993 19:365
    I dont think that you cant argue with Dennis Wise's England performance,
    one game one goal... It took Ian Wright 13 games to find the back of the
    net.                
    
    Andy..B
129.660SUBURB::COMMITCommit GroupTue Sep 07 1993 19:417
    Yeah he did score and well done to him but it was handball and what
    else did he do in that game.
    
    
    
    
    Baz
129.661UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funTue Sep 07 1993 20:1210
              <<< Note 129.660 by SUBURB::COMMIT "Commit Group" >>>

>>    Yeah he did score and well done to him but it was handball and what
>>    else did he do in that game.
    
    
    
    
So what, if the ref counts it it's a goal    

129.662hand of GodESSB::BREETue Sep 07 1993 20:545
    re:661
    
    If you don't believe that ask Maradona.
    
    Paul
129.663CALLME::MR_TOPAZTue Sep 07 1993 21:4212
       re .651:
       
       > what is more likely to happen is that we will scrape through on
       > goal difference, go to the States under Taylor, without a right
       > back, and put up with him bringing on defenders when we are 1-0
       > down to Zaire with ten minutes to go.
       
       Zaire has been eliminated.  In the unlikely event that the English
       qualify, you will have to be content to watch them succomb 1-0 to
       the Ivory Coast.
       
       --Mr Topaz
129.664Please stick to footballBLKPUD::WATTERSONPCan I speak to an adult ?Wed Sep 08 1993 01:087
    
    Yawn yawn...
    
    You make Cunno sound interesting - can't you take your anti-English
    remarks to a more relevant notesfile ?
    
    Paul
129.665FORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTAWed Sep 08 1993 13:4736
On the Russ & Jonno Show this morning (Virgin 1215) They asked listeners to
phone in with advice for Graham Taylor. Although no classics, they should help
brighten up a dull day ( so far )

	Try and score more goals than Poland...

	Emigrate to Peru and spend the rest of your life as a llama...

	Put in 2 goalkeepers and hope the Poles don't notice...

	Some guy dictated a letter of resignation

But my favourite came from a Scotts guy..

	Call Andy Roxburgh..... He's been getting away with it for years

Best of luck to all teams in the British Isles today

re .658

>Replacing Walker with Adams is like replacing a Camel with a Donkey....

After Walker's last few games for England, I would say it's like replacing a
snail with a Donkey. It was after all Walker's slowness of thought, and total
lack of positional awareness during the Norway game that actually led to the
goals. I'm not saying he was the sole culprit, but more is expected of him.
Maybe being dropped will make him realise that he too has to earn the right to
wear the England shirt. As for Adams, his form has gone in the other direction.
I for one actually feel he is improving (I don't believe I just wrote that), and
his recent performances for England show that.

Defence tonight is the key. If it plays as a unit, then England should win. The
midfield is strong, and, although not at international level yet, the front
men's record speaks for itself.

Al
129.6663-1 to England, (I hope)GVA05::BURKHALTERWed Sep 08 1993 14:1111
    So long as there is no repeat of the Poland game at wembley 'x' years
    ago that stopped us from qualifying, what with the nightmare scrambles
    for a goal etc, my brother who was 9 at the time went to his room and
    cried his eyes out for 2 hours at the end of the game.
    
    He probably doesn't give a damn these days, but I know I'll be mighty
    pissed-off if England dont win.
    
    The consolation if we lose is that Taylor will have to go.
    
    -Dom                                                     
129.667Do Holland or Norway play tonight?????KBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Wed Sep 08 1993 14:270
129.668ECCGY4::HAIGHIf voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it.Wed Sep 08 1993 14:451
    No.
129.669Did I say that...?ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Wed Sep 08 1993 17:3017
    
    O.K this is totally out of character but,
    
    This is difficult for me to say but,
    
    I wish the English the best of luck tonight !
    (They need it)
    
    After seeing the type of goal Mr. Wright is capable of scoring 
    (i.e Arse v Toffs) it would be a shame if he didn't get to play 
    in the U.S.
    
    If only he could do it for Engerland. Ahh sigh !
    
    Still think you should sack Taylor !
    
    Peter (An Impartial Celt)
129.670YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingWed Sep 08 1993 18:054
    
    	Subs announced as:
    
    	Woods, Walker, Clough, Sinton, Sherringham.
129.671Need time...VMSSG::FUERTESWed Sep 08 1993 18:296
    What time is kickoff?
    
    I want to set the satellite and vcr here in the USA but I need the
    time.
    
    Carlos
129.67215 mins to goWOTVAX::MACDONALDIStalybridge CelticWed Sep 08 1993 18:336
    
    
    kick off time is 2.45pm UK time.
    
    
    mac
129.673re -.1 Wrong gameFORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTAWed Sep 08 1993 18:353
The Ireland game starts in 15 mins, the England game starts at 8pm BST I think

Al
129.6741 - 0WOTVAX::MACDONALDIStalybridge CelticWed Sep 08 1993 18:525
    
    
    Rep of Ire 1 (aldridge)   Lithuania 0
    
    
129.675Wrong noteFORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTAWed Sep 08 1993 19:035
Mac, Ireland are in Group 3, that's note 130.

This is the group with England, Holland, Norway, Poland et al.

Al
129.676The mans a clownMIACT::CLARKSONWed Sep 08 1993 21:278
    I too was 'gutted' when England lost to the clown et al and remember
    Kevin Hector coming on and nearly scoring with his first touch almost
    as if it was yesterday.
    
    Taylor's legacy (particularly from the totally gutless, anonymous and 
    inept performances against Norway and USA) is that hardly anyone cares
    about tonight any more.  He did well at Watford and Villa but has blown
    his England credibility completely - he has to go!
129.677BUSSTP::DREESThu Sep 09 1993 01:132
    
    England 3 up....still 30 mins to go
129.678here we go againAIMTEC::WICKS_AU.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there!Thu Sep 09 1993 01:176
    Oh dear this means we'll get all that "england greatest team in world"
    stuff in the morning
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.679resultBUSSTP::DREESThu Sep 09 1993 01:512
    
    England 3  Poland 0
129.680Match Report Anyone?GVA05::BURKHALTERThu Sep 09 1993 14:151
    
129.681Good night..PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Sep 09 1993 14:1923
    
    Good result, great atmosphere and good performance.
    
    Having been gulity nof getting carried away before, feet firmly on the
    ground now, as with Graham Taylor in charge anything is still possible,
    but lets just say he got it right for this one. (but why cant they play
    like that all the time ????)
    
    One upafter 5 minutes, you could feel an early goal, the atmoshere was
    pretty intense, all the England team seem fired up, exspecially Gazza.
    Ferdinand onto a through ball, to slot it passesd the keeper. Good
    finish. Poland came into more a the half went on, and were starting
    to look dangerous towards the end of the first half.
    
    In the second half, Gascoigne came back to life, after seeming totally
    out of it at the end of the first half. He scored from a Ferdinand
    flick to make it 2-0. Pearce rounded of a good night with a curling
    freekick.
    
    Probably the best performance under Taylor, but it needs to be repeated
    next month in Holland. At least we are back in with a chance now.
    
    Dave... 
129.682PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURThu Sep 09 1993 14:3713
    
    Great result for England last night, were back on the road to recovery
    and and our way to the world cup finals 1994. What a brilliant 
    performance from our brave lads, and you cant argue with the quality
    goals..
    
    I now have realised that Graham Taylor is the right man for England,
    after doubting him for so long..
    
    We proved last night that we are still one of the best teams in the
    world.. What do you think mr Wicks..?
    
    Andy..B
129.683lies, damn lies and....FORTY2::ETHERIDGEThe bottles are all empty...Thu Sep 09 1993 14:473
	updated table please someone?

	Ian
129.684A win at lastFORTY2::ROBERTSONLiving with Flamingos on the DELTAThu Sep 09 1993 15:2455
                 P  W  D  L  F  A  Pts
    Norway.....  7  5  2  0  20  3  12
    England....  8  4  3  1  19  6  11
    Holland....  7  3  3  1  17  8   9
    Poland.....  6  3  2  1   8  6   8
    Turkey.....  8  1  1  6   7 17   3
    San Marino.  8  0  1  7   1 32   1


    Remaining Matches:
    
    Sept 22:	San Marino v Holland
    		Norway v Poland
    
    Oct  13:	Holland v England
    		Poland v Norway
    
    Oct  27:	Turkey v Poland
    
    Nov  10:	Turkey v Norway
    
    Nov  16:	San Marino v England
    
    Nov  17:	Poland v Holland	
                                
Good sprited performance last night. 

Great start with the first of 3 great goals coming after just 5 minutes.
Ferdinand goes through 2 defenders, and picks up a diagonal pass from Platt in
his stride, and smashes it past the keeper.

The keeper then started making some great saves, esp Wright & Gascoigne.

Half time 1 - 0

The second half started as the first

7 minutes into the half a cross come in from the right ( Jones??) Ferdinand rise
high above the defence, knocks the ball to Gazza who takes one touch then slots
it home.

The third came soon after. A free kick from 25 yards, and that man Stuart Pearce
did the biz.

Everyone played their socks off, and the only player who could feel down was
Wright who should have broken his Wembley duck for England. Adams, who totally
justified his place, hassled a Pole defender just outside the Polish box, robs
him, then sends a perfect cross to Wright, who tried to delicately lob the
keeper ( on the 6 yard box ), but sliced horribly. Should have smashed low and
hard to either side of the keeper.

One member of the squad who definitely won't be going to Holland is Gazza who
picked up his 2nd yellow card. Other yellows went to Adams & Jones.

Al
129.685It's the next one that counts....GVA05::BURKHALTERThu Sep 09 1993 15:467
    That's bad news if there is no Gazza for the Holland game, as he's
    the player they most fear.
    
    Norway are due some bad luck, and should stumble in one of the
    remaining games.....but Holland's the real problem.
    
    -Dom
129.686Cmon Norway...SIOG::A_KELLYThu Sep 09 1993 15:596
    
    > Norway are due some bad luck....
    
    Any bad luck for Norway = disaster for England
    
    Ned
129.687howdja figure?ESSB::BREEThu Sep 09 1993 16:033
    How do you make out that a problem for Norway is bad for England?
    
    Paul
129.688ECCGY4::HAIGHIf voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it.Thu Sep 09 1993 16:243
    
    	Because Norway all almost certainly going to qualify, that leaves
    one place for England, Holland and Poland to fight for. 
129.689Simple...NOTSIOG::A_KELLYThu Sep 09 1993 16:3411
    re .687
    
    cos there are two qual places and there's no point in wanting a team
    who are ahead of you on points, with a game in hand, and a better
    GD to get beat off a team that can pass you (ie Poland) even if you
    win your last two games.
    
    I know there are numerous permutations but defeat or defeats for Norway
    just make it more complicated, and therefore uncertain.
    
    Ned
129.690PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Sep 09 1993 16:3714
    
    The situation for England is easy....win both the remaining games and
    we will qualify. On last nights performance we can go to Holland in
    confident mood, but the problem is having two performances like last
    nights in a row, its unheard of under Graham Taylor.
    
    A draw in Holland and a win in Sam marino should do us.
    
    The situation is alot better than it was at the same time yesterday,
    although we are still by no means certain to qualify and only a
    performance on a par with last nights will enable us to get any sort of
    result in Holland.
    
    Dave...
129.691Crunch game in RotterdamGALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Thu Sep 09 1993 16:497
    
    A draw in Holland will almost certainly do England.  Anyway England
    will have a better idea of exactly what is needed by October 13th. 
    England played very well last night.  It will be some game in
    Rotterdam.  I assume it's live on tv but will it be on Sky or BBC/ITV?
    
    Gary.
129.692holland-england 2-1HLMB01::RICHARDThu Sep 09 1993 17:189
    Guys,
    
    no predictions yet its all to close at the moment does anybody know
    what happens if the teams are equal on points at the end of all the
    matches, i suppose goal difference first but after that??? As stated
    before the cruncher will be holland-england the team that loses that
    encounter is definitely out and yes England will miss Gazza...
    
    Richard.
129.693Fair Play..well doneSIOG::DLUGAG::RUSSELLWexford All-Ireland Champions '94Thu Sep 09 1993 17:2321
re - 1

Gary, I dont care whether its on BBC or SKy SPorts...ya see I won a satellite 
system last May, and acquired a Sky SPorts card last weekend....8^)

Anyway, England played really well, they were fantastically determined and 
put in the most solid performance since Adam was knee high  to a grasshopper.

Poland were a poor shadow of the team that over-ran England last May.

I dont think they'll miss Gazza in Holland. He's a superfluous player. They 
will need hard men in Holland to defend in depth and break away to strike the 
goal that matters. However, regardless of commitment, England lack the 
tactical cuteness to win in Holland.

Its just a shame that one of Holland/England wont qualify. Being Objective 
about it, my money is on Holland.

Good Luck,

*Tiger*
129.694The real work has yet to be done...GYMAC::DCASSIDYThu Sep 09 1993 17:559
    
    England invariably play better when the opposition is of a higher
    standard. They should get a result in Holland. Rumours have it that
    Bergkamp is not at his peak  YET. He , with Gascoigne out, will be the
    key to the game. Contain him and England will get the point they need.
    Anything more will most defintely be a bonus for them.
    
    Dezzz.
     
129.695PLUNDR::MORANUntil DEC doth us part!Thu Sep 09 1993 18:0710
    
    >I dont think they'll miss Gazza in Holland. He's a superfluous player.
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    That's not how you spell superlative.
    
    Tim
    
    PS that was a joke before you all get all unneccessarily anti-English
    on me ;-) 
129.696The new John Barnes ?WOTVAX::GREENJAAndy GreenThu Sep 09 1993 18:268
    
    Good England performance last night, GT's team selection totally
    vindicated but ....
    
    Why doesn't he pick Ian Wright the goal scorer from Arsenal 
    instead of Ian Wright the pop singer ?
                   
    Or was it just bad luck ?
129.697GALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Thu Sep 09 1993 21:4720
    
    Okay here's how I see this group 
    
    Norway need 3 points from Poland H & A and Turkey A.  This should be
    well within their compass.
    
    England need a minimum of a draw in Holland and a victory over San
    Marino.  This may still not be enough but it probably will be.
    
    Holland need to beat England and San Marino and then draw in Poland,
    A draw v England and victory in Poland would suffice if San Marino were
    hammered.
    
    Poland need 3 points from Norway and 4 from Turkey A and Holland H.
    This scenario would also knock out England.
    
    I think Norway are too good for Poland.  England should take a point in
    Holland and shade it on goal difference.
    
    Gary.
129.698TRUCKS::SANTso near yet sofa...Thu Sep 09 1993 21:5822
    
    	Good summary Gary.
    
    	I don't think Poland will get much away in Norway, though are
    	likely to be tough opposition at home against Holland (I'm
    	assuming that Turkey and San Marino will be rolled over by
    	Poland/Norway/Holland/England now they have no chance).
    
    	If England draw in Holland then they should get to USA. However,
    	it all comes down to timing of the games imo...we've often
    	seen Poland completing the bulk of their schedule later than other
    	sides in their group, so if they're still in with a chance then
    	Holland will find it tough in Poland.
    
    	Poland's next game, against Norway, is key.
    
    	I think we're favourites for the second place now, provided we
    	get at least a draw in Holland, cause Poland and Holland will
    	cancel each other out and Norway still need a win to be sure, 
    	which they will probably take from Poland.
    
    	Andy.
129.699The Holland GameGVA05::BURKHALTERFri Sep 10 1993 10:213
    OK, Pick your 11 best defenders here.....
    
    -Dom :-)
129.700Up the Republic (Eire to qualify with ease !!)KURMA::JJACKFri Sep 10 1993 16:0110
    
    It was interesting to read in this mornings press, that the general
    public, media & footballing authorities in the USA DO NOT want 
    Un-ger-land to qualify for the World Cup.
    This is basically put down to the English fans....& I quote "Loutish" 
    behaviour. They (the people mentioned above) think it would be more
    trouble than it's worth to have England qualify, due to the security
    headaches/costs that their cretinous majority of fans would cause. 
    
    
129.701PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCFri Sep 10 1993 16:108
    
    Does that also mean they dont want the German's and Dutch to Qualify
    aswell...???
    
    I seroiulsy doubt that America with all the problems with crime in that
    country is worried about 100 drunk Englishmen singing about WWII.
    
    Dave...
129.702More fans = More damage = more bad publicity KURMA::JJACKFri Sep 10 1993 16:178
    
    Dave
    
    I cannot comment on the feelings regarding the Dutch, Germans etc....
    Only on what was reported in the press.
    Me finx the figure would be nearer 1500 to 2000....and that tends to
    make a difference when it comes to smashing up bars etc..........
    
129.703PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCFri Sep 10 1993 16:2416
    
    >> Me finx the figure would be nearer 1500 to 2000....that tends to
    >> make a difference when it comes to smashing up bars etc..........
    
    Err...you've been away with England and seen it yourself have you, or
    are you just going by what you read in the paper...?
    
    Dont beleive the hype. Dont get me wrong, I'm not saying that England
    are not deserved of there reputation, but there's nothing like a good
    old media reation, and alot of the time, thats what you get.
    
    Unfortunatley if you are in a foreign country supporting England,
    everyone thinks you are a hooligan anyway, which we have ourselves to
    blame for, I know, but 1500 to 2000 is a slight exageration.
    
    Dave...
129.704SUBURB::ABSOLOMTOne o three and countingFri Sep 10 1993 16:329
    
    Absolutely Dave. In comparison to the French/German/Dutch etc, the
    English hooligan problem is virtually non existant these days. Policing
    is at it's lowest for years & the fences are getting smaller and lower
    and blunter.
    
    Tony
    
    
129.705FORTY2::ASHMail Interchange Group, ReadingFri Sep 10 1993 16:3710
Can anyone remember when we last beat Holland? I recall a few draws and one 
stunning defeat (88), but can't remember a win.

My fear is that if GT reckons a draw will be enough, he'll try and keep the 
same team, but moving Platt forward to bring in Batty (or similar). Holland's 
weakest area has to be their defence so I'd rather see a positive approach.

But, when did we ever guess what Taylor was going to do?!

grahame
129.706Re .704KBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Fri Sep 10 1993 17:0912
  Tony I agree with you on the national scene that crowd trouble is at a low
in the English league which is great to hear. But ye still have a "big" bunch
of idiots that follow the national team and they don't care about footie their
there to get drunk and cause as much trouble as possible.

   I wonder how the scene will be next month in Holland??!!!! I hope football 
wins on that night and not hooliganism.. Ton have you any comments????



                                                                       -dave-
129.707ASABET::KNIPSTEINFri Sep 10 1993 17:1413
    Re: .700
    
    Where did this report come from.  As a member of the "general public"
    residing in the Boston area, I have not seen or heard of any such
    massive feeling in regards to not wanting the English to qualify.
    When this area hosted the England-USA match in June, there were no
    problems at all with "Loutish" behaviour.
    
    Based on what we've seen in the press lately, I would think people
    would be much more concerned with the Columbian supporters - based on
    their reaction to beating Argentina and qualifying for WC94.
    
    Steve
129.708BLKPUD::WATTERSONPwho me ?Fri Sep 10 1993 17:2413
    
    re .700
    
    What press did you see these reports in ?
    
    It wouldn't be the Scottish press stirring up sh*t because Scotland
    have failed to qualify ?
    
    When I was in the States a few weeks back, all the people I spoke to
    hardly knew what football was, never mind objected to England
    qualifying because of our 'thugs'.
    
    Paul 
129.709Objective - sell papers not give newsISIDRO::BREADIEFri Sep 10 1993 17:2711
    
    Sky News quoted the Boston Globe as the source of the report. It would
    be consistent, when I was in the states last August there was a full
    one page article by some huy in the Boston Globe on why the should not
    bring the WC to Boston. There were amazing statements about how people
    die at MOST games and every game has wanton vandalism etc etc. It was
    the most uniformed article I had seen.
    
    Wonder what he will write when 30000 Irih people have a two week party
    and piss up at Foxborough. I guess an apology would be out the
    question.
129.710Lies, damn lies and BG articlesGALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Fri Sep 10 1993 17:307
    
    Having seen some of the total rubbish written in the Boston Globe that
    article wouldn't surprise me.
    
    Anyway England will be going to Orlando if they qualify.
    
    Gary.
129.711Why JUST us?MOEUR1::SMITHFri Sep 10 1993 17:487
    
    And while we're talking about it, when was the last time an England
    'crowd' killed the ref. aka the South Americans...
    
    I agree that the English fans have been misbehaved in the past, but,
    there are many, many WORSE sets of fans around the World, so why pick
    on ONLY England?
129.712The New York Sun perhaps.YELBUS::DSMITHGazza's my hero...NOT!!!!!Fri Sep 10 1993 17:4823
    
    
     Nothing to do with the Scottish press stirring up sh*t.
    
    The article was in the New York Daily News by columnist Michael Lewis.
    
     "Much to the chagrin of the World Cup USA 1994 officials, England is
     again alive and kicking. The English, notorious for their rowdy and
     obnoxious fans, dominated Poland.
    
      No one will admit it publicly but Cup officials would love England
     and its fans to stay at home next year. It would save a lot of
     headaches and a huge amount of money on additional security."
    
     Maybe this paper is the equivalent of some of the tackier rags we get
    over here. 
    
     No matter what countries qualify, there will always be some idiots
    hell-bent on causing trouble after having a couple of sodas too many.
    Admittedly, some have a worse reputation than others!
    
     Danny.
    
129.713trained by the Sun!AIMTEC::WICKS_AU.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there!Fri Sep 10 1993 20:4517
    The daily news is or was owned by Rupert Murdoch - need I say more.
    
    The Boston globe has published a number of anti-english articles as was
    mentioned in a number of earlier replies and it seems that they will
    continue this - note their reports on the riots in Chicago after 
    the Bulls won the NBA whilst being very low-key and less than
    sensational did compare them to "english soccer games"
    
    Of the 3 big east-coast cities i've only found the Washington Post so
    far that gives football a decenent and fair coverage.
    
    ...and as Gary said if England qualify they will be in Orlando so it
    doiesn't seem anyone elses business anyway.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.714BUSSTP::DREESFri Sep 10 1993 22:0410
    
    re. 705
    
    This snippet of info was in todays paper....
    
    England have only beaten Holland once in 7 meetings in the last
    23 years and not on Dutch soil since 1969.
    
    Del.
    
129.715Dutch are worst on own soil !UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Mon Sep 13 1993 13:541
    re-1	So this could be changed, next month !
129.716PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURMon Sep 13 1993 15:544
    
    Well if we dont beat them on the pitch were bound to 'DO em' outside!!!
    
    
129.717ECCGY4::HAIGHIf voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it.Tue Sep 14 1993 14:0310
    
    	Re .last , that was a funny note.
    
    
    	England do have a problem with the National team fans, even though
    at club level the situation is MUCH better now. Did you see some of the
    'people' interviewed after the win against Poland? 
    
    	Back to football, surely Clough is the obvious replacement for
    Gascoigne for the Holland game?
129.718Potential hooligans?PAVONE::TURNERTue Sep 14 1993 14:099
     re: .717
    
    >England do have a problem with the National team fans, even though
    >at club level the situation is MUCH better now. Did you see some of the
    >'people' interviewed after the win against Poland? 
    
    No, I didn't. Just out of interest, what did they have to say?
    
    Dom
129.719Warning; Major generalisation in this note.ECCGY4::HAIGHIf voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it.Tue Sep 14 1993 14:545
    
    
    	The obligatory fist waving, "we are the greatest", "class showed
    through" quoting, suspect looking charachters. The sort of people you
    would throw Neil Ruddock at.
129.720Re- Nigel CloughPEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Sep 14 1993 16:5916
    
    Re- Clough
    
    No way....he was given his chance on the US tour in the Summer, and
    despite the results, it was a chance for certain players to show what
    they have got, (eg Pallister). Clough flopped totally. He isnt in even 
    a half fit Gascoignes class. I would forget trying to replace Gascoigne, 
    as we havent got anyone, and just play a right sided midfield player. 
    Either Merson or Sinton, with Platt and Ince in the middle and Sharpe
    on the left.
    
    Dave...
    
     
    
    
129.721Holland have their own problems...PAVONE::TURNERTue Sep 14 1993 17:0032
    Oh well, I was expecting something a bit more sinister, i.e. threats of
    violence. 
    
    At worst, you could criticise these people for being unrealistic, but you 
    hear those sort of reactions from most supporters when they've won 3-0. A 
    case in point: the Danish supporters at the '86 World Cup (and afterwards) 
    with red-and-white painted faces who never stopped chanting: "We are
    red, we are white, we are Danish dynamite!". That is, until they were
    thrashed 5-1 by Spain.
    
    On a different note, it would appear that the Dutch have at least as
    many problems as Turnip and co: 
    
    Van Basten - injured (and unavailable) 
    
    Gullit - no longer wishes to be considered while Advocaat is manager
    and  has strongly criticised the team's cautious style of play  
    
    Roy - is finally starting to produce the goods in Italy, but has been
    dropped from the squad by Advocaat who considers him to be too 
    "lily-livered" (or whatever the Dutch equivalent is!) for 
    international football 
    
    Vink - can't get a place in the Genoa team 
    
    Bergkamp/Jonk - both dropped from the Inter team at the weekend, and
    the Dutch press are livid! (Bergkamp's exclusion was a  little bit of a
    mystery, but Jonk is seriously out of form).
    
    Feast your eyes on that little lot!
    
    Dom   
129.722WISE "SIMPLY THE BEST"PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURTue Sep 14 1993 17:297
    
    I still think that Dennis Wise should play in place of Gazza, you
    cant complain about his goal per game ratio.. Wise has proved himself
    once and I'm sure he'll do it again if given the chance. I cant believe
    the likes of Wright, Ince, Walker, Ferdinand and Paul Parker have been 
    picked ahead of Dennis Wise.
    
129.723PAVONE::TURNERTue Sep 14 1993 17:4215
    
    >I still think that Dennis Wise should play in place of Gazza, you
    >cant complain about his goal per game ratio.. Wise has proved himself
    >once and I'm sure he'll do it again if given the chance. I cant believe
    >the likes of Wright, Ince, Walker, Ferdinand and Paul Parker have been 
    >picked ahead of Dennis Wise.
    
    I presume this is a joke (not that I have any particular objections to
    Dennis Wise) or are we to presume that in other times you'd have added John
    Barnes, John Fashanu, Viv Anderson, Mark Chamberlain, Andy Gray and Luther 
    Blissett (to name but a few) to this little lot?
    
    Or was it sheer coincidence? Or have I taken the bait?
    
    Dom
129.724Spurs fans never forget Waddle.CHEFS::HARRISRGoosenargh!Tue Sep 14 1993 17:448
    Going back to Nigel Clough. The man is just to slow. If the match was
    played in an area, say the size of Birmingham, he may just get enought
    space to time one of his famous passes, but probably will still get the
    ball pinched off of his feet. If Taylor wants a playmaker, then why not
    bring in Waddle, and for once, play him in position ?
    
    			Rich H
    
129.725PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURTue Sep 14 1993 17:513
    RE.723
    
    I'm no racist!!!!!   I like English people :-)
129.726Dennis, Why ?WOTVAX::GREENJAAndy GreenTue Sep 14 1993 18:018
    re .722
    
    I couldn't find a footballing reason for your choice of men who should
    stand down for Dennis Wise.
    
    Can Dennis really do a good job in any position or are you implying 
    that Dennis Wise would be selected if he had a better suntan ?
                                                 
129.727oops.WOTVAX::GREENJAAndy GreenTue Sep 14 1993 18:032
    
    I went for lunch mid-note, sorry for the repitition.
129.728Hoddle to take Gazza's role!SHAWB1::STOCKMANSTue Sep 14 1993 18:2912
How about Glen Hoddle replacing Gazza!

Gazza's not exactly got the most pace in the world.
They both play the same type of game as well.

John Giles in The Express thinks he'd be the perfect replacement.
Me thinks he'd be good for the best part of the game.
Only the pace of the game would be a problem for Glen, or would it?

I'm sure Holland won't be in a hurry to knock the ball about.

Si
129.729Hoddle the MagnificentFORTY2::FOWLERMCome the glorious dayTue Sep 14 1993 19:116
He'd get my vote. After all, he's still only 35 (I think) and even if he were 45
he'd still be the best player in England by a street.  

Why not make him Captain?

Mike
129.730Seconder.ESSB::PHAYDENIt's not how long it takes but how well you do it...Tue Sep 14 1993 19:146
    
    re:last
    
    Yep ! I second that one Mike.
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt)
129.731Toooooooooooooo SlllllllloooooooooooowwwwwwwCHEFS::HARRISRGoosenargh!Tue Sep 14 1993 20:076
    On his day Hoddle was the best player in the world, but not now. Could
    the team afford to protect Hoddle's lack of pace, and susceptibility to
    be a little hopeful with some of his passes, when playing from the
    back. If Hoddle is in rthe team, then he should be manager.
    
    Rich H
129.732Still a month to go though!PAVONE::TURNERTue Sep 14 1993 20:2318
    
    Much as I rate them, I think it's highly unlikely that Taylor will
    plump for either Hoddle or Waddle for such an important game. They're
    not the easiest of players to fit into a team setup and they'd need time
    to mould an understanding with the other players, and the last thing
    England would want in Amsterdam would be to have to carry a passenger. 
    
    It's far more likely that he'll go for a safer but less spectacular 
    choice...Andy Sinton or Gary Parker maybe. I think Sharp, Wright, Ince
    Ferdinand and Platt are all assured of the places; they're all
    extremely quick which will keep the Dutch worried on the break. 
    
    Platt's good at finding the net in high pressure situations and against 
    quality opposition (he's scored against Germany, Brazil, Argentina, Holland,
    Belgium, Italy and USSR!). Likewise, Ferdinand worried the Dutch sick
    at Wembley; how he didn't manage to score I shall never know.
    
    Dom 
129.733Not such a silly idea, honestPLUNDR::MORANWaist not, want not!Tue Sep 14 1993 20:317
    
    Personally, I would pick Robert Lee of Newcastle to play on the right
    and place Platt back in the middle.
    
    But then again, I would wouldn't I?
    
    Tim
129.734SHAWB1::STOCKMANSTue Sep 14 1993 21:304
re -1


yep you would.
129.735SHIPS::EDWARDS_DWed Sep 15 1993 13:184
    Brian Robson seems the obvious choice to me.  Big-match experience,
    links well with Ince and Sharpe and he'll get stuck in.  I'm not saying
    he should be a regular international, but for games like this he is
    ideal.
129.736Roll out the wrinkliesCHEFS::HARRISRGOOSENARGHWed Sep 15 1993 13:527
    Why not Sir Stanley Matthews, in his day that man could play, OK so
    he's not as quick as he used to be, but what an ideal replacement for
    Gazza. Bobby Charlton I believe is available too. The midfield should
    be plugged with someone like Carlton Palmer, allowing Platt to lurk
    behind the front two. That would frighten the Dutch a little.
    
    Rich H.
129.737UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funThu Sep 16 1993 12:0341
                     <<< Note 129.721 by PAVONE::TURNER >>>
                    -< Holland have their own problems... >-    
    
    >>On a different note, it would appear that the Dutch have at least as
    >>many problems as Turnip and co: 
    
    >>Van Basten - injured (and unavailable) 
    
    He's already out for so long you can't realy say we miss him, it would be
    nice to have him but he hasn't score for the national teams in ages so...


    >>Gullit - no longer wishes to be considered while Advocaat is manager
    >>and  has strongly criticised the team's cautious style of play  
    
    Supurb player but can't keep paste with the game Holland play.

    >>Roy - is finally starting to produce the goods in Italy, but has been
    >>dropped from the squad by Advocaat who considers him to be too 
    >>"lily-livered" (or whatever the Dutch equivalent is!) for 
    >>international football 
    
    Has been dropped from the team after the EC in Sweden last year, can't
    really say we miss him with the likes of Overmars and van Vossen in the
    team.

    >>Vink - can't get a place in the Genoa team 
    
    I don't see this as a problem as Vink rarely plays for Holland

    >>Bergkamp/Jonk - both dropped from the Inter team at the weekend, and
    >>the Dutch press are livid! (Bergkamp's exclusion was a  little bit of a
    >>mystery, but Jonk is seriously out of form).
    
    I don't think they are out of form but the are just too attacking for
    their Italian coach, Bergkamp scored three goals last night.

       
    >>Dom   
 
    T_
129.738ECCGY4::HAIGHIf voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it.Thu Sep 16 1993 13:529
    
    	At the risk of inflaming the Hoddleites -
    
    	I always thought that what Barnes is now, Hoddle was before, great
    player who seemed incapable of performing at international level.
    
    
    	I too, think that Waddle should be in the team, but it appears he
    never will be again, which is why I suggested Clough. 
129.739Consider me inflamedFORTY2::FOWLERMCome the glorious dayThu Sep 16 1993 14:0815
Not quite true. 

Barnes has been an automatic choice for England (when he's fit) simply because
of the goal he scored against Brazil in 1824. Glenn Hoddle on the other hand was
very impressive for England on the few occasions that he was picked. 

In today's team he would stand out like a diamond in pig droppings. 8-)

Futhermore, Barnes is picked despite the fact that he hasn't even played well
for Liverpool for years, whereas Hoddle is playing superbly.

That said, he is a bit too old to be recalled into the England side. He'd still
be a better manager than Taylor though.

mike
129.740ECCGY4::HAIGHIf voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it.Thu Sep 16 1993 14:3511
    
    Hang on Mike, 
    
    	Hoddle played around 40 games for England. The good performances
    could be counted on one hand. I met a bloke who was assistant Physio
    for the England team and he said Hoddle was just to nervous when he
    played for England. 
    
    > He'd still be a better manager than Taylor though.
    
    	I think he'd be a good choice for manager.
129.741Hoddle=Genius..PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Sep 16 1993 14:3910
    
    Hoddle never let England down, and was more often than not brilliant.
    He wasnt picked for the simple reason that he cant tackle,and wouldnt
    run up and down the pitch for 90 minutes.
    
    Great player....
    
    Dave...
    
    
129.742Hoddle=genius, part 2FORTY2::FOWLERMCome the glorious dayThu Sep 16 1993 15:0213
re:-2

Name a single player who has consistently lived up to his domestic reputation
for England since the 1980s. The truth is that our no-practice, no teamwork,
style national team doesn't help passing players. They all turn in sporadic
bursts of genius (Hoddle more than most) but are eventually dismissed as
disappointing. Compared to the international careers of Ian Wright, Paul
Gascoigne, John Barnes, and such like Hoddle was brilliant. Most people stand
amazed that he didn't get more games: 40 isn't many for a player of his stature.

He is, was, and always will be the best player to grace English football.

Mike
129.743consistency personified ;-)WOTVAX::GREENJAAndy GreenThu Sep 16 1993 15:175
    
    I'd like to nominate Geoff Thomas, every bit as good for England as I
    ever thought he was in the league. He certainly never suffered through 
    lack of practice or teamwork.
            
129.744ECCGY4::HAIGHIf voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it.Thu Sep 16 1993 15:3418
    > Name a single player who has consistently ....
    
    	I hate to say this but, Brian Robson - YES YES YES, he may not have
    been as talented as Hoddle, but that's not what I'm sayaing. I wonder
    if the old archived football notesfile is around to refresh our
    memories about Glendas 'sparkling' international career.
    
    > The truth is that our no-practice, no teamwork, style national team 
    > doesn't help passing players. They all turn in
    > sporadic bursts of genius (Hoddle more than most) but are eventually 
    > dismissed as disappointing.
    
    	Agreed.	
    
    > He is, was, and always will be the best player to grace English football.
    
    	You are to Hoddle-o what Cunno is to Aldo. Shall we open a new note
    for you? ;-)
129.745YUPPY::MCCABEMikeThu Sep 16 1993 15:4118
    Talk about rose-tinted spectacles!  Hoddle, actually won over 50 caps
    for England and in the vast majority was a huge disappointment.  
    
    No doubt he was a very, very good English league player, but to describe 
    him, as someone did, as the best player in the World at a time when 
    Johann Cruyff, Michel Platini and Diego Maradona were playing is 
    ludicrous in the extreme.
    
    And as for, "He is, was, and always will be the best player to grace 
    English football," sorry Mike, but this is more rose-tinted nonsense. 
    Did you never see a certain Mr Best play?  In his prime, in my opinion,
    he really WAS "the best player in the World". 
    
    Arguably, Hoddle has been the best Tottenham player of the past twenty 
    five years (some might say, not difficult :-)) although Ardiles might 
    argue about that, but best player etc. no way.
    
    Mike M 
129.746YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingThu Sep 16 1993 22:478
    
    	Everyone seems to be talking of a central midfielder. To break down
    	the Dutch we will need 2 wider players such as Sharpe and Merson,
    	which leaves Platt and Ince in the middle.
    	Forget Hoddle and Clough. The other choice could have been Waddle
    	but that seems very unlikely.
    
    	Tony B.
129.747'Bin' the pretty stuff for this one!GVA05::BURKHALTERFri Sep 17 1993 12:557
    If a draw will be enough against the Dutch, and the Dutch need to win,
    then the team that Taylor chooses must be a strong defensive one, with
    a couple of forwards that can break away in a 'fast break' and score.
    
    Basically we must do to Holland what Poland did to us in the '70s...
    
    -Dom
129.74876 % of all statistics is worthlessOSL09::BJARNECan you hear the drums in the wood ?Tue Sep 21 1993 17:4619
Just one day to go, and then we'll beat Poland....
Who are we ?  The Norwegian "Drillo's", still unbeaten in the qualifing
group 2. 
4 matches has been played since Erik Thorstvedt had to pick 
the ball out of the goal .... but, but, but .... look at these numbers:

1963: Poland - Norway 9 - 0.
1989: Norway - Poland 0 - 3.

Just statistics, forget it ! 76 % of all statistics is worthless !

Under the lead of Egil "Drillo" Olsen we have won 16 out of 30 matches !
(OK, that's also statistics, but nevertheless). 

My guesses for tomorrow:	Norway - Poland 	1 - 1
                        	San Marino - Holland	1 - 4


Bjarne
129.749UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funTue Sep 21 1993 19:0215
  
>>My guesses for tomorrow:	Norway - Poland 	1 - 1
>>                        	San Marino - Holland	1 - 4
>>
>>
>>Bjarne


Whot a joker, San MArino scoring against Holland? Wake up buddy!

You are also underestimating your own country 'cause they won't draw
1-1 and you know it!


T_
129.750Poland is out, or?BCFI::SCHOTTMickey Mouse is a ratTue Sep 21 1993 22:348
    
    Drop a point to Poland? AT HOME? No, no, no...
    
    If only the famous spagetti-legs don't come over you, you will
    beat their butts off the field. And that's it: USA prepare for
    Norway!
    
    Hermann
129.751Dutch line-up for tonight's gameUTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funWed Sep 22 1993 15:0214

                                   De Goeij


                     Koeman                     de Boer


      Wouter                       Jonk                      Rijkaard


                                 Bergkamp

Overmars                  Kieft        Bosman                      Roy
129.752OSL09::BJARNECan you hear the drums in the wood ?Wed Sep 22 1993 16:2956
129.753Results of 22nd Sep '93ZPOVC::KUMARThu Sep 23 1993 05:2517
    From the BBC World Service ....
    
    Norway	1
    Poland	0
    
    Thorsvedt got sent off as well. But Norway still won.
    
    Holland	7
    San Marino	0
    
    Match played in Bologna. 
    
    Interesting results. Where does this leave England ?
    
    Regards,
    
    Kumar
129.754Hoping for a miraclePLAYER::LESOILThu Sep 23 1993 11:297
    
    Re.-1
    
>>  Interesting results. Where does this leave England ?
    
     Not far from the bottom end.
    
129.755UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funThu Sep 23 1993 11:5817
Dutch goalscorers last night


Bosman     (Anderlecht) 3
Jonk       (Inter)      2
Koeman     (Barcelona)  1
R. de Boer (Ajax)       1


Very poor play by Kieft, Bergkamp and Roy. 

I saw the match live on Dutch telly and Kieft was two times alone in front
of the goal and managed to get it over (just 1 meter away from the goalline)
or next to the goal. Bergkamp played like a sissy and was never in the game.


T_
129.756StatusOSLACT::HENRIKWRiding the Nordic TerritoryThu Sep 23 1993 12:3016
                                     
    Norway	  8   6 2 0   21-3   14
    Netherlands   8   4 3 1   24-8   11
    England       8   4 3 1   19-6   11
    Poland        7   3 2 2    8-7    8
    Turkey        8   1 1 6    7-17   3
    San Marino    9   0 1 8    1-39   1
    
Remaining:
    Oct 13:  Netherlands vs England
    	     Poland vs Norway
    Oct 27:  Turkey vs Poland
    Nov 11:  Turkey vs Norway
    Nov 16:  San Marino vs England
    Nov 17:  Poland vs Netherlands
    
129.757Brits abroad....ELIS::PEGGThu Sep 23 1993 13:4725
    Hello,
    
    OK, I'm finally entering the fray. My name is Dave Pegg and I am in the
    (un)enviable position of being an Englishman living in Holland.
    
    I watched some of the match last night and must agree with Mijneer
    Jansen's comments. It should have been 0-10. Thank God it wasn't!!
    Dreadful game. No atmosphere. It sounded like there were more people
    on the pitch than on the stands!
    
    So, what happens now? I'm in a rather difficult situation as whatever
    happens on Oct 13th will probably cause a divorce and loose me most of
    my local friends. Yes you guessed it, my wife is Dutch!! Judging by the
    current performances, my bet is a goaless draw. This keeps up England's
    chances but knowing our luck, we'll only manage 1 or 2 against San
    Marino and not qualify on goal difference.
    
    Its all a real shame as this year is effectively the world cup for both
    of our countries.
    
    Until nearer the date......
    
    Dave     
    
    
129.758God must be Norwegian !OSL09::BJARNECan you hear the drums in the wood ?Thu Sep 23 1993 14:5927
129.759Date changeFORTY2::ASHMail Interchange Group, ReadingThu Sep 23 1993 16:3725
>      <<< Note 129.756 by OSLACT::HENRIKW "Riding the Nordic Territory" >>>
>                                  -< Status >-
>
>                                     
>    Norway	  8   6 2 0   21-3   14
>    Netherlands   8   4 3 1   24-8   11
>    England       8   4 3 1   19-6   11
>    Poland        7   3 2 2    8-7    8
>    Turkey        8   1 1 6    7-17   3
>    San Marino    9   0 1 8    1-39   1
>    
>Remaining:
>    Oct 13:  Netherlands vs England
>    	     Poland vs Norway
>    Oct 27:  Turkey vs Poland
>    Nov 11:  Turkey vs Norway
>    Nov 16:  San Marino vs England
>    Nov 17:  Poland vs Netherlands
    
Those last two games are now being played on the same day (the 17th?). 

England now have to either draw in the Netherlands and beat San Marino by 3 
goals more than the Dutch beat Poland, or win on 13 October. No easy task.

g
129.760Congratulations Norway!BCFI::PIHLSTROMThe bowsprit looks forwardThu Sep 23 1993 17:4717
    
    See You in USA next year! 
    
    
    Norway (Sweden and Denmark) against the rest of the World -
    	
    			What a fight!!!
    
                           \
                            \     /\
    The Swedish Swagman  :)_/____/  \_
                            \    \
                            /     \
                           /      /
     _     _     _     _     _   /_
        -     -     -     -     -
    
129.761Bergkamp Is he all there?SIOG::MATTHEWSFri Sep 24 1993 19:3010
    Is Bergkamp overrated?? He appears to have done little in the
    Holland-San Marino match. I watched the Inter-Lazio game on Channel 4 
    last week, and he did not appear to be the major influence in the Inter
    team that we expected he would be..
    
    Compared to the Lazio players, (Gasgoigne, Signori, etc) who were
    marked just as tightly as he was, he looked pedestrian. Or maybe he is
    being played out of position and cannot cope??
    
    How much of an influence will he be in the England-Holland game?  
129.762UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funFri Sep 24 1993 19:5010
rep -1

Bergkamp can produce very fine footy but he hasn't got any backbone so the
minute things don't work out for him he's gone.

He'll probably won't be seen for 89 minutes when Holland plays England next
month, but that one minute will be the score to 2-2


T_
129.763I hope it'll be to score 1-0!!!!!!KBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Fri Sep 24 1993 20:2110
  I saw the Lazio v Inter match on TV and the snickers kid was worse than
useless. The best foreigner was Thomas Doll by a mile.... Bergkampf had a much
better game than the bounty hunter!!!!!, he even got replaced during the second
half.


                                                                         -dave-

                                                 
129.764FIFA ranks Norway in a third position :->OSL09::BJARNECan you hear the drums in the wood ?Mon Sep 27 1993 14:4543
RE: Note 129.760 from The Swedish Swagman
    
>>    See You in USA next year! 
>>    Norway (Sweden and Denmark) against the rest of the World -
>>    			What a fight!!!

Sure I hope to see You there, thank you for your congratulations !!

FIFA now rates Norway as the Worlds third best football nation, after 
Brazil and Italy..... 	:-)	:-.	:->

We was in the 9.th posistion a month ago. Since then, we have beaten:
	Norway 1   -	USA 0
	Norway 1   -	Poland 0
I saw these games, which makes me question the value of the FIFA ranking.

The ranking probably won't be used when the World Championship final 
groups are put together. FIFA uses results from earlier championships for 
seeding the teams (as far as I now). 

Oh, sorry, we aren't there yet, just dreaming.... We'll have problems if
Bergkamp does what Jansen believes (and Norway loose in Poland):

RE: Note 129.762 from UTROP1::JANSEN

>> Bergkamp can produce very fine footy but he hasn't got any backbone so the
>> minute things don't work out for him he's gone.
>>
>> He'll probably won't be seen for 89 minutes when Holland plays England next
>> month, but that one minute will be the score to 2-2

I hope he miss that chance because 2-1 for England means that Norway 
has qualified. 2-1 for Holland _also_ means that Norway has qualified....
My opinion: It's a pity that one of you have to miss the finals, I like
	    the Dutch style of football, and I have followed English
	    football the last 15 years.
	    Let the best team win ! (Or the second best - doesn't matter.
	    please don't draw !)

Oh, we'll qualify anyway (I think). Yes, I am sligthly nervous about
the next games...
                                   
Bjarne
129.765HAMCL3::SCHARNBERGzsunjuMon Sep 27 1993 15:134
    
    My heart is with the Norwegians (and the Greek).
    
    Heiko
129.766Its the Finals that Count....GVA05::BURKHALTERTue Sep 28 1993 11:077
    No doubt Norway will win the qualifying group, but you can be sure
    that just as in the past where teams have had good results in
    qualifying when it comes to the Finals, they flop!
    
    Both England or Holland would go further in the finals.....
    
    -Dom
129.767HAMCL3::SCHARNBERGzsunjuTue Sep 28 1993 12:535
    Yes, that's what we have seen before. Still I am always happy when 
    'underdog' teams make it to the finals. Norway will probably be seeded
    in the category 'C' pot, which will not make their life easier. 
    
    Heiko
129.768quick questionGAOV10::MURPHYWed Oct 06 1993 11:523
    What time is the Holland-England game kicking off at next wednesday??
    
    Anthony..
129.7698.00 or 8.15UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Wed Oct 06 1993 13:103
    re -1 probably at 8.00 PM (our time is the same now, I guess..)
    
    John
129.770KERNEL::MCKEAVENEYJHow's that....you're outWed Oct 06 1993 13:185
129.771US coverage on Prime/SportsChannelPTOVAX::BIGLERArt Bigler - Technical OEM Group - DTN-422-7873 @PTOWed Oct 06 1993 18:1930
    For those of you in the United States, Prime/SportsChannel is covering
    the England-Holland match live on October 13 starting at 2:00 PM
    Eastern time.  They also plan a same day repeat broadcast.
    
    Prime/SportsChannel affiliates carrying the match are (according to
    Soccer America):
    
    	- Prime Sports Midwest			- Madison Square Garden
    	- Prime Sports Upper Midwest		- Prime Ticket
    	- Prime Sports Intermountain West	- Home Team Sports
    	- Prime Sports Rocky Mountain		- Empire Sports Network
    	- Prime Sports Northwest		- New England Sports Network
    	- KBL Sports Network			- Pro Am Sports System
    	- Home Sports Entertainment		- Sports Channel Chicago
    	- Sunshine Network			- Sports Channel Pacific
    	- Sports South Network
    
    I guess you know if one of these serves your area, KBL is here in
    Pittsburgh and New England Sports Network is the biggie in most of
    Massachusetts.
    
    I also read in the Newcastle United note that Andy Cole may dress for
    England.  Dress? - he should start!  Believe me, I saw England play
    Germany in the US Cup in Detroit.  Just his presence on the pitch would
    require Holland to consider pulling back to cover his offensive
    potential and perhaps open things up a bit.  Please, somebody pick up the
    telephone, ring Graham Taylor and explain this to him.  
    
    Art
    
129.772a reply to the previous noteCHEFS::HARRISRGOOSENARGHWed Oct 06 1993 18:269
    Taylor would probably put Cole in defence! The problem with Taylor is 
    
    he is the England manager, and he shouldn't be. He has the tactical
    awareness of a Lemming near a cliff top. He never seems to play his
    players in the positions they fill for their clubs, and then slates
    them. ( Chris Waddle for example ). Cole would be a good choice for
    England, but like any attacker, he needs a supply of decent balls, and
    unfortunately, he will not get them. This will knock his confidence for
    six, rather like Ian Wrights.  
129.773Englands Number 9WOTVAX::GREENJAAndy GreenWed Oct 06 1993 19:3713
    
    Worry not, Shearer is back.
    
    If the supply is pitiful our Alan will go and take it off either defence,
    I hope this will stop Ronald Koeman (sp?) from strolling forward and
    making a nuisance of himself.
    
    Always assuming that Taylor doesn't play Shearer at left back instead 
    of Sharpe ;-)
    
    Have faith,                                                       
    
    Andy   
129.774Great newsAIMTEC::WICKS_AU.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there!Wed Oct 06 1993 20:1814
    Re .771 
    
    Art - this is great news. By Wednesday we'll be sick of watching
    non-stop baseball down here in Atlanta and watching a real sport
    will be a nice break. I believe I will WFB (working-from-bar) on
    wednesday watching Holland take on and beat
    'the-greatest-team-in-the-world' (:==:)
    
    IF soccer America list any other upcoming WC games on TV please post
    them as a reply to note 112 (i think that's the number).
     
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.wicks
129.775UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funWed Oct 06 1993 21:4531
              <<< Note 129.773 by WOTVAX::GREENJA "Andy Green" >>>
                             -< Englands Number 9 >-

    
>>    Worry not, Shearer is back.
>>    
>>    If the supply is pitiful our Alan will go and take it off either defence,
>>    I hope this will stop Ronald Koeman (sp?) from strolling forward and
>>    making a nuisance of himself.
>>    
>>    Always assuming that Taylor doesn't play Shearer at left back instead 
>>    of Sharpe ;-)
>>    
>>    Have faith,                                                       
>>    
>>    Andy   

Andy,

don't get ya hopes up as Ulrich van Gobbel will play in defence along with
Koeman, he's one of the fastes if not the fastes defender in the world, this
will make the way free for Koeman who isn't very fast (what an understatement).

I'll probably again will have a free ticket so I'll be there if things don't
go wrong.

I hope we will win but honestly I think it will again be a draw and no Holland
in the US of A.


T_
129.776England worriesPIECES::63585::PCDEFAULTPlace holder for NOTESThu Oct 07 1993 12:324
Pearce, Wright and Ferdinand look dodgy to
play. Wright has a 50-50 chance.

Chris.
129.777Who is favourite ?NEWOA::FIDO_TConation is the keyThu Oct 07 1993 12:3515
>I hope we will win but honestly I think it will again be a draw and no Holland
>in the US of A.
    
    I find the above interesting as it implies that you think Holland need
    to win to qualify for USA ( i.e. a draw will be better for England
    than Holland ). Is that the general impression in Holland ?
    
    In UK, it is believed that England need to win to qualify, as they will
    probably not be able to score enough goals in the last game ( 3 more
    than Holland score against Poland ? ).
    
    If both teams believe that a draw will not be sufficient, it should make 
    for an interesting match !
    
    Terry
129.778C'mon England...pleaseSIOG::A_KELLYThu Oct 07 1993 12:4417
    
    As a Newcastle (and England) supporter the Holland v England game
    leaves me in a quandary...
    
    I would *love* to see Andy Cole pull on the white shirt and terrorise
    the orangemen, but I'm afraid, like previous noters, that he is just
    *too* young and inexperienced, and it could knock him back years. He
    is, however, without a doubt, *the* best striker in England today, and
    could do it for England next week.
    
    The worst part of all this is that *if* he doesn't play, and England
    *if* lose then Newcastle will probably also lose their manager!
    
    How can I win in this situation, as Wright is like a damp squib for
    England, and Shearer is still somewhat untested????
    
    Ned
129.779An English Centre Forward !WOTVAX::GREENJAAndy GreenThu Oct 07 1993 12:4320
    RE: .775
    Mr T,
    
    Its a pity both Holland and England won't make it but I do hope your
    fears are justified.
     
    The point about Alan Shearer is not one about speed alone, there are a
    number of centre halfs in the premier league who have been surprised by
    the size of his shoulders.
    
    It doesn't matter how fast Van Gobbel is if he's flat on his back ;-)
    
    I think (hope!) this attitude, combined with excellent touch and shooting
    ability might just disrupt the Dutch defence.
    
    We shall see,
    
    Cheers,
    
    Andy
129.780PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Oct 07 1993 13:146
    
    Ferdinand and Wright are both doubtfull....good.
    
    Its a blessing in disguise, in comes Teddy to save the day.
    
    Dave...
129.781a match made in heavenCHEFS::HARRISRGreat things are afoot!Thu Oct 07 1993 13:203
    Sheringham and Shearer up front could be deadly. 
    
    Rich.
129.782Dreamin' again...SIOG::A_KELLYThu Oct 07 1993 13:3213
    re .781
    
    >Sheringham and Shearer up front could be deadly
                                              ^^^^^^
    
    Should that not read dead.....
    
    I admire your confidence but I'm afraid that Sheringham would be about
    as good as Wright in an England shirt.
    
    Here's hoping I'm wrong!!!
    
    Ned
129.783Do it my wayKERNEL::WITHALLGEven Better Than The Real ThingThu Oct 07 1993 14:2626
    
    Scoring goals or not Ian Wright Wright Wright puts the shi**ers up 
    every defence. He as unpredictable as the English Weather.
    Money couldn't buy him.
    Didn't see many people saying "oh no not him" when he done the biz
    against whoever he did the biz against in the WCQ's
    
    			
    	               	Seaman
    Dixon	Pallister	Adams 		Pearce
    
    	  
     	     Gazza     Ince	Sharpe
    
             Wright  Ferdinand   Shearer
    
    
    Subs 
    Merson
    Batty
    Keown
    Jones
    Withall
    
    
    Gazzer 
129.784May the best win !UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Thu Oct 07 1993 14:288
    For once I have to agree with Ton ; the general opinion here in Holland
    that we have to win to be in the World Champions. We have to, but we
    can't ; most players are injured or not in the right condition. 
    However, when the dutch team is in the situation as it now, they can do
    strange....no, mysterious things. And could even win from an English
    team.......For sure it will be a great game to watch !
    
    John  
129.785Gazzas twin brother or what!!!!!!!!!!!KBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Thu Oct 07 1993 15:4522
 Re .783    Gary I believe your star player "the fat kid" eat too many mars bars
            during the previous games so they had to suspend him from this game!!
            This could well be Englands advantage because they can now probably
            play as an eleven man team without allways looking out for the kid.

Re  .784    John you also have to remember your playing England and not Germany,
            Brazil, or even the USA.:)  Englands record over the past ten games
            has been less than impressive, and if Norway can do the bizz at
            home then there's no reason why Holland can't do it. They also have
            the advantage that their playing at home and they don't have so much
            media pressure.

No matter what the result is it will be a little strange that one of those teams
wont make it to the states. I hope its a good game and that the best team wins
not the luckiest no matter which team it is. Anyway by the time the game starts
I hope to be celebrating our qualification.... although I reckon we'll draw 
against the Spanish....


                                                                 -dave-
             
129.786The Mars Bar Kid vs. The Guiness GulperPAVONE::TURNERThu Oct 07 1993 17:2630
    re: .785
    >Gary I believe your star player "the fat kid" eat too many mars bars
    >during the previous games so they had to suspend him from this game!!

    Yeah, he should take a lead from Ireland's own slimline, Jane Fonda
    workout disciple, Ronnie Whelan! Actually, Gascoigne's injured (out for
    the next month with a knee ligament problem) so he wouldn't have played
    anyway.
    
    I don't want to give Graham Taylor *too* much stick (after all, he did
    get it right last time out ;-)), but it's funny how we always seem to
    be trying out players, or combinations of players, in big matches.
    Shearer made his debut against France and then didn't play again till
    he was thrown in against the same country during Euro '92. Sharpe
    played in the second half against Ireland at Wembley and then didn't
    play again (if memory serves) until the second Norway game. And there
    are other examples (Pallister, Sharpe...). So much for the concept of a
    "settled team". 
    
    >No matter what the result is it will be a little strange that one of
    >those teams wont make it to the states. I hope its a good game and that
    >the best team wins not the luckiest no matter which team it is.
    
    (Muffled choking sounds.)
    Well, that *is* rich! Next you'll be saying that you don't mind if
    Digital lay you off next week...so long as it's for the good of the
    company! Go back and read some of your happy-go-lucky replies after
    past England victories - you obviously enjoyed every minute of them.
    
    Dom
129.787Read the Stars do we Dom.....KBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Thu Oct 07 1993 17:436
   Dom Iam been layed of and their telling me its for the good of the company,
Iam sure that will bring a smile to your face.

                                                                -dave-
                                           
129.788Foot in mouthPLUNDR::MORANWaist not, want not!Thu Oct 07 1993 17:475
    
    A phrase from the film "A Few Good Men" springs to mind. If you haven't
    seen the film, sorry but I can't repeat it.
    
    Tim
129.789Apologies.PAVONE::TURNERThu Oct 07 1993 18:037
    re: .787
    If this is true, then I can only say that I'm very sorry.
    
    And it doesn't bring a smile to my face. And no, I don't read the
    stars.
    
    Dom
129.790No worries Dom....KBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Thu Oct 07 1993 18:1811
  Don't worry Dom.... Life goes on.... Yea sure I want Holland to win and to go
to the states, but I would prefer to see them win fair and square by  two or
three clear goals, as regards poxing one in the dying seconds, I don't believe 
that's fair on any team but unfortunately that's how it sometimes goes. My main
concern at the moment (regarding football) is that we qualify and preferably next
week, ie Ireland of course....

                                                                 -dave-

p.s Thanks for the condolences, but its becoming popular at DEC.
129.791PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Oct 12 1993 12:1010
    
    England team to face Holland to be announced at 12:00pm today.
    
    Worrying reports that Taylor is about to bring in the prolific Paul 
    Merson, to partner Alan Shearer. 
    
    No Wright...No Sheringham...?????
    
    Dave...
    
129.792Wright Is FitSHIPS::DURANT_STue Oct 12 1993 12:2719
    
    Wright is now fit and resumed full training yesterday, so should
    partner Shearer up front according to the radio. However, Pearce is
    still a problem and Dorigo may have to take his place.
    
    I reckon the only doubts about Taylor's selection is the left back
    position and who plays on the right to replace Gazza. The right I 
    think is between Sinton and Trevor Steven.
    
                               Seaman
    
    		Jones	Pallister   Adams   Pearce/Dorigo
    
    	Sinton/Steven   Ince        Platt   Sharpe
    
    			Shearer		Wright
    
    
    
129.793PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Oct 12 1993 12:329
    
    Re-1
    
    According to the radio this morning and various daily papers. Wright
    will be dropped and Merson will take his place. Also Paul Parker will
    replace Rob Jones and Carlton Palmer will come in for Gazza.
    
    Dave...
    
129.794UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funTue Oct 12 1993 12:428
yesterday the Amsterdam police arrested 39 England "supporters", they were
drunk and molested people with big chumps of wood, one of them knifed down
an innocent bystander.

it looks like the mess has already started and that it's a matter of time
it will be more.

T_
129.795It'll be a great game 1-2 to EnglandGVA05::BURKHALTERTue Oct 12 1993 13:474
    Anyone know of any pubs in Geneva that will be covering the game
    tommorow, plus what timw dows it start?
    
    -Dom
129.796PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURTue Oct 12 1993 13:5114
    
    I hope the rumours about Merson,Wright and Palmer are wrong, I think
    Sheringham should get a bite at the cherry. 
    
    I cant understand how Dennis wise hasn't been picked for the big 
    match, this just goes to prove that Taylor doesn't know what he's
    doing. How can you not pick a player with an England record like
    Dennis Wise..( one game one goal)
    
    As to the football violence.. I'm sure our fellow English gentlemen
    were only having a few quiet drinks and then were provoked by some little
    irritating clog dancing fools.
    
    Andy..B
129.797The world should be an enGERland free zone !!!KIRKTN::CPATRICKI'm doing it tomorrowTue Oct 12 1993 14:127
    
    I think it is about time that all enGERland fans were banned from
    going abroad.
    How many country's will they have to cause trouble in before they are
    either shot or banned for life.
    
     SQF Jambo #1
129.798Stay At Home.DBCIC1::62770::RUSSELLWexford All-Ireland Champions '94Tue Oct 12 1993 14:2613
Guys,

This is the pits.  You all know I'd love to see England qualify, but in all honesty we 
can all do without this short of crap.

After this bout of violence, I'll be rooting for Holland tomorrow. The rest of the World 
can do without having to endure the hassles caused by the "tiny minority" of England 
Supporters who cause all this grief. 

The F.A. And the English Police should solve this problem....why should everyone else 
have to suffer for their ineptitude?

*Tiger*
129.799PEKING::COSSEYNTue Oct 12 1993 14:5115
    
    This is getting boring who gives a shit about the violence. England
    have a very important game tomorrow and yet again it's being over
    shadowed by a small minority of so called "Football Supporters" it's
    bad enough reading and hearing about it on every news report, let alone
    idiots making stupid comments about it in this conferance. Lets keep
    the chuck England out of the competition comments to yourself and
    discuss issues about Englands most important game since the Semi Final
    of the last World Cup......
    
    Englands team will be announced at lunch time today and according to
    the papers a number of changes will be made...I shall wait to hear what
    the side is first before I pass comment..
    
    Neil...
129.800Palmer for the Mars Bar Kid?(can't be tru)SIOG::HOWARDTue Oct 12 1993 15:002
    this must be ajoke about bringing Carlton Palmer back....isn't it?
    does Taylor really want to qualify?
129.801A draws better for England...GVA05::BURKHALTERTue Oct 12 1993 15:395
    ....does Taylor really want to quailfy?
    
    Maybe he really wants a draw..
    
    -Dom
129.802PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Oct 12 1993 15:4926
    
    Team...
    
    Seaman
    Parker
    Dorigo
    Pallister
    Adams
    Palmer
    Ince
    Platt (capt)
    Sharpe
    Merson
    Shearer
    
    Err....Taylor is at it again, Merson playing for his country in a
    position that he doesnt even play for his club. Ian Wright and Teddy 
    Sheringham must be sick.
    
    Parker....???, he wasnt even picked in the squad for Poland, now he
    edges out Rob Jones...and as for Palmer..
    
    Graham Taylor is unbelievable.
    
    Dave...
    
129.804FORTY2::ASHMail Interchange Group, ReadingTue Oct 12 1993 16:007
This is bad . . . the only recommendation I heard for Palmer came from a 
Dutchman, presumably Parker will attempt to mark Bergkamp, which will leave us 
without a right back, and Merson, well, not on his current form.

Until 5 minutes ago, I was optimistic about tomorrow!

grahame
129.805FORTY2::FOWLERMCome the glorious dayTue Oct 12 1993 16:1821
Personally, I'm hopeful.

The Dutch defence is, when all is said and done, crap. It is unlikely to be able
to hold Alan Shearer so all we really need is someone to cross to him. Paul
Merson, come on down.

Ian Wright hasn't scored against decent opposition for years now, and if Taylor
kept picking him it would be John Barnes all over again. He can't even play a
full game for Arsenal these days without getting substituted. Don't believe the
hype.

With Shearer alone up front, we'll be able to up the pace and dominate the
midfield. Whatever you say about Palmer, you can't fault the guy's work rate and
I'm confident that he'll get the job done.

Three one to England, and no Holland in USA '94.

A victory for justice, and England climb righteously back into the top 3
international teams.

Mike
129.806We're Doomed !!SHIPS::DURANT_STue Oct 12 1993 16:2113
    
    From Radio Berkshire, the station that quite sensibly thought that if
    Ian Wright was fit he would be partnering Alan Shearer, we hear that 
    Palmer is in to mark Bergkamp.
    
    Why has the team been announced so early ? At least he could have kept
    the Dutch quessing that he was going to pick a decent team, and maybe
    go for the win.
    
    I wish I had'nt listened to the news now.
    
    		Steve.
    
129.807Defensive sideGALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Tue Oct 12 1993 16:2912
    
    Parker and Palmer are on for their defensive qualities.  Merson will
    probably play deep also.  Taylor wants a draw.  Holland need to win and
    England don't.  It's a final gamble.  If he gets a result he's a hero.
    
    The problem with horses for courses is that you don't have a settled
    side.  Remember Oslo.
    
    I still think England will hang on for a point.  If they get a win I'd
    be surprised.
    
    Gary.
129.808CHEFS::HARRISRGreat things are afoot!Tue Oct 12 1993 16:3026
    I thought you all might want to be able to read note .798 and see what
    the missing words were.
    
    Rich.
    

           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 129.798              World Cup qualifying Group 2                798 of 805
DBCIC1::62770::RUSSELL "Wexford All-Ireland Champio" 13 lines  12-OCT-1993 11:26
                               -< Stay At Home. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Guys,

    This is the pits.  You all know I'd love to see England qualify, but in all 
    honestly we can all do without this short of crap.

    After this bout of violence, I'll be rooting for Holland tomorrow. The rest
    of the World can do without having to endure the hassles caused by the 
    "tiny minority" of England supporters who cause all this grief. 

    The F.A. And the English Police should solve this problem....why should 
    everyone else have to suffer for their ineptitude?

    *Tiger*
129.809Bye Bye Engerland :-(ESSB::PHAYDENTue Oct 12 1993 16:4115
    
    Ha,Ha,HaHa,Ha.
    
    Well obviously Monsieur Taylor, being the gentleman that he is, felt
    that it would not be cricket to field a coherent team against an
    understrength Dutch side, so he picked the team out of a hat. I think it
    must have been a fluke that Seaman actually ended up in goal. He's a
    nice man isn't he your Mr. taylor !!!
    Reports suggest that Laurie McMenamie was picked to partner Shearer until
    someone pointed out that Taylor had misspelled Paul Merson. He probably
    won't realise until just after kick-off tomorrow that Paul Merson
    doesn't spell Mark Wright.
    Oh Well, sigh....
    
    Peter (An Impartial Celt).
129.810Good grief!UNTADE::PCASYorkieTue Oct 12 1993 16:4811
    
    I hate the predictions note, and this is turning into one. But, having
    seen the team I can't help thinking that England might as well not
    bother turning up. In a way England losing will not be too bad, at
    least we get rid of Taylor - thank God.
    Why bother going to Holland with a defensive team? - somebody mentioned 
    that the Dutch defence was useless (Mike I think), but England are
    just as crap at defending, if not worse. So, much as I hate predictions
    I reckon Holland 2 - England 0.
    
    Al.
129.811Re .799 and .796KBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Tue Oct 12 1993 16:495
   With comments like that from Mr. Cossey and Barefield its no wonder your
image abroad is non-existent... but then again we all know ye.... and hopefully
ye won't get too sick if Holland stuff ye....
                                                                -dave-
129.812PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCTue Oct 12 1993 16:5713
    
    With this team, I would be very suprised if we win tomorrow. We could
    hang on for a draw, but I can only see a Dutch win to be honest.
    
    If we do somehow get a win, Taylor will be a very lucky man, and I bet
    its a case of Holland playing badly rather than England going out a
    deserving a win.
    
    Very depressed....the thought of World Cup Football without us taking
    part doesnt bare thinking about. I hope we win, even if it means having
    to put up with Taylor until after the World Cup.
    
    Dave...
129.813PLUNDR::MORANTunami, tunami!Tue Oct 12 1993 17:054
    
    Have the subs been named?
    
    Tim
129.814PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURTue Oct 12 1993 17:155
    
    Get back under you toadstool Tanner with all of your other Leprecaurns..
    There's not MUSHROOM for your sort on this note. 
    
    You take life to seriously and I think you had better watch your 'ELF.
129.815ECCGY4::HAIGHIf voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it.Tue Oct 12 1993 17:1815
    
    Re .811,
    
    	I understand it's hard but please do not tar us  all with the same
    brush as  the noters you mentioned and the retards in Holland. I heard
    that the English police supplied pictures and files on known offenders
    which has resulted in some deportations and others being refused entry
    at the sea ports. 
    
    	Back to the team, I agree with  Mr Wilson (Is this a  first? :-) ),
    it looks like a  replay of Norway. Taylor putting out a  team to  get a
    draw, which will probably back fire again. 
    
    
    			Steve
129.816WHATS TAYLOR DOING NOW!PEKING::COSSEYNTue Oct 12 1993 17:3411
    
    Graham Taylor does it again just when you think he's at last got it
    right he pulls another trick out of the bag....This man should have 
    been extridited with all the other morons.....Get him out...
    
    
    Neil...
    
    A pi**ed off sensible noter thats fed up  with being tarred
    with the same brush as Mr Barefield......
                                              
129.817Re .815KBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Tue Oct 12 1993 17:3712
  Steve I know there's good ones out there.... who know what their talking
about and accept that your team is average and that a minority of your fans are
animals... and that an even smaller minority who write in hear are still wearing
nappies. Mr barefield its not Leprecaurns its Leprechauns, but not a bad try for
your age.

                                                                    -dave-


p.s That's a strange looking lineout for tomorrows game, Ton any news on the
    Dutch team???????
129.818PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURTue Oct 12 1993 17:498
    
    Sorry about the spelling, but it was Mr Cossey who told me how 
    to spell it.
    
    By the way... You dont fool any of us Neil, youv'e shown your true
    colours to many times on this notes file.
    
    Andy..B
129.819GAOV10::MURPHYTue Oct 12 1993 18:282
    I'd rather be small green and cute(Leprechauns)than short,fat,and
    ugly.(Bulldogs).
129.820LeprechaunsUBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJAnd then there were none...Tue Oct 12 1993 18:339
129.821Rather be a Leprechaun.GAOV10::MURPHYTue Oct 12 1993 19:029
    Sean,
        I was having a go at PEKING::BAREFIELDA fo his remarks at us
    Leprechauns.
    
    Regards,
    
    Anthony.
    "
    -
129.822UBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJAnd then there were none...Tue Oct 12 1993 19:042
    
    
129.823Should be a tough one....GYMAC::DCASSIDYTue Oct 12 1993 19:0834
    
    England's team does look a bit on the 'restrain them' rather than
    'stretch them' capabilities. Before I go any further...I'm not
    justifying the team selection on Graham Taylor's part but there are a
    few things worth bearing in mind. A few  mentioned that:
    
    1. Holland need to win rather than draw more than England do.
    2. Holland's defence is not the best around.
    3. Holland are playing in front of a very passionate and sometimes
    just as impatient crowd as England's Wembley faithfuls.
    
    The ball is really in Holland's court and I suppose the England selection
    reflects this. Taylor it seems, is hoping to frustrate the Dutch to the
    point that when Ince, Platt, Sharpe And/or Merson CAN get to make some
    runs, the amount of free space will be that much better and maybe
    Shearer can get on the end of a few. Whether he'll put them away is a
    different matter. This of course assumes that England's defence is
    capable of holding the likes of Van Vossen, Bergkamp and Roy for at
    least up until half time. 
    
    In reality I can see a repeat of the England-Germany game in Detroit
    during the summer where Ziege and Effenberg tore shreds out of England's
    midfield. 
    
    Key men tomorrow ??  Bergkamp and Platt I'd say. Who's playing the
    better club football ? Who's the more experienced ? 
    
    There are too many cancelling effects on both sides. An honest man
    would say 'let the better team win'; so far 'on paper' that 'seems' to be
    Holland.
    
    Cheers,
    
    Dezzz.
129.824And AgainUBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJAnd then there were none...Tue Oct 12 1993 19:107
129.825Holland Gain An AdvantageSHIPS::DURANT_STue Oct 12 1993 19:298
    
    I thought manager's did not have to inform the officials of their team
    selection until an hour before kick off. Why give Holland the chance to 
    plan their team and tactics ?
    
    Perhaps Taylor has already cleared his desk.
    
    			Steve.
129.826PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURTue Oct 12 1993 19:3911
    
    I dont know why Taylor doesn't field a side for some attacking
    football.  If we go out then we should go out fighting and not go 
    out defending for 90 minutes. He's made a right mess up with this
    England team and it may see us out of the world cup. How anybody
    can field Calton Palmer in the England side is beyond me, he's crap.
    If we get a new manager then I can see Dennis Wise making his second
    Appearence in the England side, one game one goal is a brilliant
    scoring record for any player. 
    
    Andy..B
129.827Results huh !!!ESSB::PHAYDENTue Oct 12 1993 19:4610
    
    If our Grahame is going to play defensive football for (Results)
    I for one can't wait for the World Cup ,group games, if England 
    do qualify.
    But they're not going to qualify, so why worry.
    
    
    Play for a win or don't play at all !!!!!!!!!!!
    
    Peter (An Impartial Celt).
129.829Other games?MOEUR1::SMITHTue Oct 12 1993 19:506
    
    Does anyone have a list of all the games that are being played tomorrow
    night?  England, France, Ireland I know, any others?
    
    Cheers,
    Ian
129.830and vinny tooSIOG::HOWARDTue Oct 12 1993 19:528
    re bring back Wise....  
    
    hear hear
    
    those two-footed, knee-high tackles are sorely missed at 
    international level....
    
    bring him back in....couldn't do much worse than the rest
129.831TV?MOEUR1::SMITHTue Oct 12 1993 19:546
    
    Is the game on TV?  Live?  Where, when, which channel, satellite etc
    etc  allthe usual (probably already answered questions!)?
    
    Thanks a lot,
    Ian
129.832Who's broadcasting the England game??BERN02::GOODEJTue Oct 12 1993 19:555
    
        Does anyone know if the England game's being broadcast on a satellite
    channel? If so, which one and on what satellite? Also the Wales game?
    
    JBG
129.833UBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJAnd then there were none...Tue Oct 12 1993 19:585
129.834Any satellite channels?MOEUR1::SMITHTue Oct 12 1993 19:591
    
129.835Rumour has it....GVA05::BURKHALTERTue Oct 12 1993 20:104
    For those in the French/Swiss guys and gals I've been told
    the games on Canal+
    
    -Dom
129.836At least he wants to play ...FILTON::KEARNS_RDear Baby, Welcome to DumpsvilleTue Oct 12 1993 20:509
    
    I think Palmer has done more in an England shirt to justify selection
    compared to players like Parker and Merson. 
    		Rob..
    	BTW Ian wright is the only named sub. Looks like he'll be played in
    the last ten minutes as England try to get the equalizer..
        Also the only time I've seen Dennis Wise play an international
    (England B) he was booed of the pitch, mind you he did score..
    
129.837Holland 2 England 1UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funWed Oct 13 1993 10:5033
        <<< Note 129.817 by KBOMFG::TANNER "U2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!" >>>
                                  -< Re .815 >

>>p.s That's a strange looking lineout for tomorrows game, Ton any news on the
>>    Dutch team???????



Possible line-up for tonight game

                     

                              de Goeij

                               
                               Koeman

                     De Wolf            de Boer

               Rijkaard       Wouters       Koeman


                             Bergkamp

               Overmars       de Boer       Roy



One other possibility is that Ulrich van Gobbel will play pushing de Boer into
midfield and Koeman onto the bench.


T_      
129.838It won't go away..!!PAKORA::SWRIGHTBeavis and ButtheadWed Oct 13 1993 11:227
    Reported this morning...


    England fans Go on the Rampage in Holland again last night (190)
    attacking Innocent people in the street. 
    
    
129.839The majority spoil it for the minority AGAIN!KIRKTN::MCAMERONWed Oct 13 1993 11:4010
    Just for a change, it was also reported.......

    One or two mindless individuals caused all the trouble..

    The rest of the poor unfortunates arrested were all victims of heavy
    handed tactics by the Dutch riot police........Seem to have heard this
    one somewhere before.

    Ban them ALL....Martin SQFCSC 
129.840UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funWed Oct 13 1993 11:4018
          <<< Note 129.838 by PAKORA::SWRIGHT "Beavis and Butthead" >>>
                           -< It won't go away..!! >-

>>    Reported this morning...
>>
>>
>>    England fans Go on the Rampage in Holland again last night (190)
>>    attacking Innocent people in the street. 
  

No worries most of them have already been kicked out of Holland, the ones
that stayed here will have to visit a guy in a black dress tommorow :-))))



T_  
    

129.841PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Oct 13 1993 11:5016
    
    Is Graham Taylor about to go over the edge ?, he apparently blew a fuse 
    yesterday over critism over his "defensive" team for tonights game, even 
    swearing at one reporter who asked him why he had made so many changes 
    from the team that faced Holland.
    
    I didnt see any of the press conference, but reports say he was very
    nervous with some reports describing him as "crazy".
    
    
    I'm not at all confident about England getting any sort of result
    tonight. 
    
    Dave...
    
    
129.842Getting sick of it...UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Wed Oct 13 1993 11:555
    Amsterdam was almost a battlefield yesterday untill late in the night.
    According the press 140 arrests. And only after escalation of violence
    the riot police (ME) was on the spot.....Don't these people realise
    that they can cause banning of the team if they continue like that ?
    Hopefully Holland can do it tonight on the way how it belongs !
129.843ashamed.....WELCLU::BROWNIThe Man who sold the WorldWed Oct 13 1993 12:026
    Something has to be done about this minority that start all the
    trouble. Lock 'em up and throw away the key.
    
    Makes me ashamed to be English. 
    
    Ian
129.844SUBURB::GROOMNEarning a fortune, paid a pittance !!Wed Oct 13 1993 12:1415
    
    Well I think GT has done a great selection job, the only question mark
    being the inclusion of Merson who, as mentioned earlier, isn't renowned
    at that position for his club.  I would certainly have gone for
    Sherringham or perhaps even Cole.  The inclusion of Parker isn't such a
    bad thing, let's face it, GT has to make the best of a bad lot at right
    back.  Carlton Palmer works his butt off for 90 minutes every game he
    plays, even though he runs like an ostrich and will form a substantial
    obstacle alongside Ince in midfield allowing Sharpe and Platt to get
    forward more frequently.
    
    I think England will win 2-1 or perhaps draw, but this is not a losing
    team.
    
    Ever hopeful - Nev
129.845Ban arrested fans for life !!!!!ESSB::PHAYDENWed Oct 13 1993 12:1515
    
    Why is there so little trouble at English League games in 
    recent years ? Is it just not reported, or do the police
    just manage to control it ? 
    It just seems strange that, you've cleaned up your act at home 
    but the scum seems to still find an outlet abroad ! Why are these
    trouble makers allowed to travel. If they can be kept quite at home
    well then the police must know who they are.
    
    The bit about a couple of fans starting the trouble and the Dutch
    police going hell for leather after innocent English fans seems a lot
    like bull to me. If the 190 had've been running away from the trouble
    they wouldn't have been touched !!!!!
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt).
129.846TV Highlights on EurosportBERN02::GOODEJWed Oct 13 1993 12:2719
    
    Re .831/2/3/4/5...
    
    I checked on teletex last night and it appears that Eurosport have a
    2 hour program showing the highlights from three matches starting at
    23:00pm tonight (that GMT and CET at the moment!)
    
    The matches being covered are:
    
    	Portugal - Switzerland
    	Holland  - England
    	Italy    - Scotland
    
    Another program tomorrow night (at 22:00) will show the highlights
    of a further three matches....I think these include the Ireland-Spain
    and Denmark-N. Ireland games. I still haven't seen any mention of the
    Wales-Cyprus game!
    
    JBG   Bern Switzerland
129.847YUPPY::PANESHelping the Police with their enquiriesWed Oct 13 1993 13:2916
  According to a report I heard on the radio this morning, the reason
  why  Taylor lost it was because when he announced the team a good few
  journalists started laughing ( and who can blame them).

  re our not so invisible exports.

  The word on the street is "Holland and out". Whichever way the result goes
  our ambassadors see this as their finest ( and last ) moment. 

  As to why a police force ,that has to deal with hooliganism on a far grander
  scale ( fragmentation grenades etc ) than "our boys" ever manage, cannot deal
  with a few intellectually challenged yobs , is beyond my ken.

  Hugs,

  stuart
129.848Try Eutelsat....GYMAC::DCASSIDYWed Oct 13 1993 13:407
    
    Anybody with a satellite dish should try the Eutelsat birds on 16, 13,
    10 and 7 degrees where they usually have the feeds on World Cup games.
    Most of Irelands games were to be found albeit no commentary on these
    satellites.
    
    Dezzz.
129.849It'll do for tonight too....GVA05::BURKHALTERWed Oct 13 1993 14:155
    Last night the U21 teams played a draw 1-1.....
    
    Poland's U21 beat Norway 0-2
    
    -Dom
129.850ECCGY4::HAIGHIf voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it.Wed Oct 13 1993 14:229
    
    >     Why is there so little trouble at English League games in
    >    recent years ? Is it just not reported, or do the police
    >    just manage to control it ?
    
    
    	A good question. Nationalistic fervour (similar to what we see in
    Dresden/Leipzig only the language is different) drummed up by the
    gutter press and the moronic right, is one possible explanation. 
129.851England! England! England! England!PEKING::COSSEYNWed Oct 13 1993 15:287
    
    Well the kick-Off is about 8hrs away...So it's prediction time...
    
    I really expect England to get a result so I'm going to stick my neck 
    out and go for a 2-0 win to England......
    
    Neil...
129.852England needs Hooligans like it needs G.TaylorGVA05::BURKHALTERWed Oct 13 1993 15:328
    I'll go for a 1-2 win for England.....
    
    ...as said many times before the Hooligan problem has really nothing
    to do with Football, its a Social problem, these morons probably
    know next to nothing about football and couldn't play if they tried,
    there just 'Football's curse'
    
    -Dom
129.853Aanvalle !!!!UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Wed Oct 13 1993 15:347
    2-0 for Holland.
    By the way strange that you see here the opposite ; hooligans are
    mostly visible in clubgames ; Ajax, Feyenoord etc ( getting less
    fortunately..) but when the national team plays everyone behaves like
    an (orange) angle.......
    
    John
129.854Simply the bestUTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funWed Oct 13 1993 16:164
  


                    3 - 1 to Holland
129.855You heard it hereXSTACY::JLUNDON@GAO 822-4715 Apathy is the most terrible vice!Wed Oct 13 1993 16:231
Holland 4 - England 2
129.856No Mars, no Platt , no .....BRSISD::CLAIRE::ROOSENWed Oct 13 1993 16:387
It all doesn't matter, both will not be qualified anyway, there the 
Norwegians and the Poles will go through.
Therefore I predict (that's what I really hope it will be) a draw

	Holland		6	England		6

Paddy
129.857May the best team win!...OSLACT::HENRIKWMaking the most of miseryWed Oct 13 1993 16:508
    ...as long as one of them wins! - And one of them loses. ;^)
    
    It's a shame they can't both join Norway in the World Cup...
    
    Anyway, you Dutch and English will probably be watching a better
    game as such, than Poland vs Norway.  
    
    henrik
129.858No England fans at the GamePEKING::MCKIENNICKWed Oct 13 1993 16:528
    
    
       2-1 to England
    
       Merson and Palmer to score one each.
    
       Nick.
    
129.859I hope Un-ger-land git gubbed ! PAKORA::JJACKWed Oct 13 1993 17:338
    
    I don't care who wins..............
    
    As long as it's Holland !
    
    3-1 to the Dutch !
    
    
129.860after all,we are all British!!!KIRKTN::GDOUGALLWed Oct 13 1993 17:4515
    re-I don't care who wins.........
       as long as it's Holland
    
     Hey JJ you can't say that, what you meant to say was.......
     
    
    
    
    
    PLEASE let Holland win!!!!!
    
    
    Dutch 2 GT's defence 1
    
         A,Scot
129.861UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funWed Oct 13 1993 17:4518
                 <<< Note 129.856 by BRSISD::CLAIRE::ROOSEN >>>
                       -< No Mars, no Platt , no ..... >-

>>It all doesn't matter, both will not be qualified anyway, there the 
>>Norwegians and the Poles will go through.
>>Therefore I predict (that's what I really hope it will be) a draw
>>
>>	Holland		6	England		6
>>
>>Paddy


Je moet een echte Belg zijn om zo iets te voorspellen.

Poland hasn't got anything to do in the US!

Holland!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

129.862Here we go againNEWOA::BURTONWed Oct 13 1993 17:5812
    
    Just heard on the radio that this more fights are breaking out in 
    Rotterdam. Thousands of English and Dutch fans are now in the Rotterdam
    ready for tonights game. Dutch police are starting to worry due to
    large groups from both England and Holland acting aggressively towards
    each other.
    
    If it's like this now at lunchtime, god knows what it will be like 
    this evening.
    
    Cheers
    Nige
129.863I was a Dogs dinner tooKERNEL::WITHALLGEven Better Than The Real ThingWed Oct 13 1993 17:5835
    
    Re .798 and any others about the subject...
    
    I have just returned from Amsterdam - Came back Monday night.
    And whilst I have to agree that a mindless few are again at large
    it is not entirely the Engerlanders fault. The police were rounding up 
    many an innocent group and shoving them onto busses. For those of you
    who don't know the area, the main trouble spots were around and in
    the red light area, Damrak. The streets are relatively short, narrow 
    and divided up by small bridges that go across the canals. This splits 
    the streets into say 100meter sections with Bridges either end,
    Buildings behind you and the canal in front. No escape route for anyone
    if held here. The police were trapping everyone in these type areas and
    carting them all off on busses. That was innocent and guilty alike.
    The majority were the innocent.  What was going to happen was
    inevitable, the police were using their truncheons and many had dogs,
    the guilty and innocent had two choices, stand and get hit/bitten or try
    to escape and get hit/bitten either way we lost.
    
    "Im sorry officer and Nice Doggie" cut no ice here. 
    
    Don't get me wrong, Im not defending the louts who were chucked out but
    not everyone was guilty. Yet we all get tarred with the same brush and
    we all get beaten and bitten by the same policemen and their dogs.
    
    So where does it all go ?. What do you do next ?.
    
    Of course there is going to be violence. The plain hooligan will cause 
    violence because thats what he/she does. The innocent, when provoked       
    will respond likewise. 
    
    
    ??.
    
    Gary
129.864A possibility to see it in Europe...GYMAC::DCASSIDYWed Oct 13 1993 18:2013
    
    Apparently the match is on RTL-5 on Astra.......
    Tricky to get but ...10.934 Vertical....
    
    If you can't tune down that far on your receiver...tune down to 10.950
    and there should be an on-screen menu to adjust the skew...Adjust down
    (on Amstrad models anyway) to -10 and you have RTL-5.....
    
    Don't blame me if its only for terrestrial RTL-5 and not satelite...
    
    Hope this helps...
    
    Dezzz.
129.865wop it up'emFILTON::KEARNS_Ruh oh KWYGYBO on the looseWed Oct 13 1993 19:4510
    
    Only three hours to go....
    
    
    
           COME
    
            ON
    
             ENGLAND  ......
129.866The SPanish Inquisition in DublinDBCIC1::62770::RUSSELLWexford All-Ireland Champions '94Wed Oct 13 1993 19:489
Guys,

I take back my comment about hoping England dont qualify because of the hooligans. After 
watching Ireland get slaughtered by the Spanish today, I hope somebody can make it from 
these Islands.

Best of luck tonight, stick it to them.

*Tiger*  8^(((((((((((((
129.867UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funWed Oct 13 1993 19:5111
complete riot in Rotterdam, They mayor of Rotterdam has given the police
special power so they can arrest someone for looking funny, fights have been
reported in the whole town and I have been listening to Radio Rotterdam
so I received the news first hand, also Dutch supporters are trowing punches
and a group of four hunderd were bashing the English near the Doelen in
Rotterdam at noon.





129.868sick b*st*rdUTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funWed Oct 13 1993 19:522
<<< Note 129.866 by DBCIC1::62770::RUSSELL "Wexford All-Ireland Champions '94" >>>
                     -< The SPanish Inquisition in Dublin >-
129.869?IMAPC::MURRAYWed Oct 13 1993 19:591
    
129.870ENGLAND! ENGLAND! ENGLAND! ENGLAND! PEKING::COSSEYNWed Oct 13 1993 20:117
    
    On me way home shortly......Come on England make coming to work
    tomorrow worth while....
    
    U.S.A.  here we come...........
    
    Neil....
129.871I just read it as I hear it.PEKING::ROBERTSONDSHELLEY PINKERTONWed Oct 13 1993 20:167
    News from the radio,
    
    One fan has been shot,
    some have been deported, and some who are being flown back are fighting
    the police on the planes!!!
    
    
129.872eh???DBCIC1::62770::RUSSELLWexford All-Ireland Champions '94Wed Oct 13 1993 20:167
Ton,

re my "SPanish Inquisition in Dublin"....what do ye mean by saying "SIck B*S*T*R*"???

Watching the game live was psychically damaging, I can assure you.

*Tiger*
129.875AIMTEC::WICKS_AU.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there!Thu Oct 14 1993 01:067
    It's over....
    
    Holland 2  Greatest Team in World 0
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
129.876Norway win 3-0AIMTEC::WICKS_AU.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there!Thu Oct 14 1993 01:392
    Apparently my info on Poland was wrong as Norway won 3-0 which my
    maths tells me means they're coming to the U.S
129.877Group 2 tableAIMTEC::WICKS_AU.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there!Thu Oct 14 1993 06:1643
OK finally confirmed that Norway did indeed beat Poland 3-0 so congrats
    to them for qualifying for the world Cup
    
    watched the England v Holland game on tape delay and I have so say
    (even though i'm welsh) that I thought England were unlucky.
    
    Both Dorigo and merson hit the post and i'm fairly sure that Platt
    should have had a penalty for that daylight assault by Koeman in the
    box.
    
    of course Koeman should have been sent off which means that 2 mins
    later he wouldn't have been able to have scored at the other end.
    
    on the other hand Rijkaard wasn't offside at the end of the first half
    so the Dutch should have been 1-0 up at the half... and Bergampf's goal
    was a beauty.
    
    It's too late (at night) to work out what combination of results could
    still see England qualigy so here's the updated table
    
    regards,
    
    andrew.D.Wicks
    
                Group 2
                                   GP    W    D    L    GF    GA   Pts  
                Norway              9    7    2    0    24     3    16   
                Netherlands         9    5    3    1    26     8    13   
                England             9    4    3    2    19     8    11   
                Poland              8    3    2    3     8    10     8   
                Turkey              8    1    1    6     7    17     3    
                San Marino          9    0    1    8     1    39     1    


		Group 2
                        13.10.93: Netherlands-England 	2-0
                        13.10.93: Poland-Norway		0-3
                        27.10.93: Turkey-Poland
                        10.11 93: Turkey-Norway
                        16.11.93: San Marino-England
                        17.11.93: Poland-Netherlands

    
129.878Therr oot tae.)))))KURMA::ISUTHERLANDThe World's Greatest LoaferThu Oct 14 1993 06:484
    
    Re:last.
    If Holland lose 1-0 to Poland,then England need to beat San Marino
    7-0 to qualify.
129.879GloomGVA05::BURKHALTERThu Oct 14 1993 10:486
    
    
             ...well at least now Taylor will have to resign.........
    
    
    -Dom :-(
129.880PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Oct 14 1993 10:5716
    
    Ok... we are out.
    
    Totally p*ssed off this morning, as a game it was good, but the result
    was too imprtant to worry about good games. England competed, but the 
    typical inane Taylor tactics of punting the ball up the field hoping 
    that Shearer, who despite his definate ability isnt Les Ferdinand in 
    the air and in any case was not in the game, again wasnt good enough.
    We can say we were unlucky, and we were in this game, twice hitting the
    post and the Platt/Koemen incident. Then again Rijkard's goal wasnt
    offside, so the luck wasnt all one way.
    
    At the end of the day, we should never have  been in this position in
    the first place...and there is only one man to blame for that.
    
    Dave...very unhappy.
129.881Devastated But Not CheatedPANIC::ANDERSONEndsleigh League Div 1 (Midlands)Thu Oct 14 1993 11:2333
    
    Congratulations to Holland. Good luck to Ton & his boys...
    
    ...that's enough of the magnanimity, for although I'm not one of the
    mindless xenophobes in here that believes we have a divine right to be
    amongst the best in the world, I'm deeply dissappointed that England
    will not be competing in The States.
    
    Before the whingeing starts in earnest and the myopia sets in, I'd like
    to state my view of last night's events:
    
    1. Koeman probably should have been sent off, but :
    		it was no penalty;
    		Rijkaard's 'goal' should have meant it was already 1-0.
    
    2. Koeman shouldn't have been allowed to score because [IMO] the trip
    by Pallister was inside the box - penalty.
    
    3. Aren't international goalkeepers supposed to be of a standard to get
    their 'angles' right? Bergkamp's effort was superbly placed, but Seaman
    should have had it covered.
    
    4. Holland were the more fluent team last night.
    
    England's World Cup campaign faltered with the home draws to Norway &
    Holland, died in Oslo, and was buried last night.
    
    Only the ghost of Poland can exhume the body before decomposition sets
    in, and that *is* clutching at straws.
    
    Rob
    
    
129.883He's going to chip it ...!!!!!!ESSB::PHAYDENThu Oct 14 1993 12:069
    
    In fairness (no compensation I'm sure) England and Holland gave us one
    of the best games so far this season. Yeah the "blonde chap" should have
    been sent off and platt should've scored, but on the night Holland were
    the better teamand they deserved their win.
    Taylors whinges during the post match interview were pathetic. At least
    he only has three more years to run on his contract.
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt);
129.884Come On Poland !NEWOA::FIDO_TConation is the keyThu Oct 14 1993 12:0820
>    3. Aren't international goalkeepers supposed to be of a standard to get
>    their 'angles' right? Bergkamp's effort was superbly placed, but Seaman
>    should have had it covered.
    
    I'm not blaming Seaman for England's failure to qualify, but he was out
    of position for both Dutch goals. Having said that, the double save
    made against Berkamp and then Rijkard was incredible and he also made
    some other good saves.
    
    It must have been a good game to watch for anybody impartial, but in
    the end, England don't have the class players that the Dutch have. They
    gave the ball away far too often, while the Dutch put whole strings of
    passes together.
    
    That Koeman was not sent off for pulling Platt back was a disgrace,
    although I think that it was clearly outside the box. FIFA really ought
    to get their act together on that type of "professional" foul.
    
    Terry
                                                                  
129.885CHEFS::HARRISRGreat things are afoot!Thu Oct 14 1993 12:1515
    No matter about the absolutely appalling refereeing and lining
    decisions, England never looked likely to win. Our only exciting player
    on the pitch was Platt. Merson was OK, but we never really had any
    penetration. The England side was crying out for Gascoigne ( when he's
    was playing well ). We needed a playmaker. Parker had an identity
    crisis, and kept passing to any player in an orange shirt. We had no
    player who would go to the end of the byline, hold the ball up and whip
    a cross over. The ball was crossed far to early, and never looked
    really dangerous. Sharpe needs to improve his delivery. Where were the
    players in the team who make people go, I like to watch him play, it
    certainly wasn't Sinton, or Palmer. Ince had a good game, but got a
    curious booking. I would have prefered Englands chances against ten
    men, but otherwise, it never really looked like happening.
    
    Rich.
129.886RRRRR NutsKERNEL::WITHALLGEven Better Than The Real ThingThu Oct 14 1993 12:2420
    
    
     Well - Im gutted. I was off to the states to see an old girlfriend.
     Now what am I going to do ?. Poor decisions ran for both teams,
     Rikaard's goal counted, Koeman should have been in the bath well
     before the free kick. Ince deserved to be booked for running out of
     the wall and the fella who took his neck off with that jumping lunging
     turning spinning kick should have been carded aswel.
    
     Yung Lee Sharpe should be the last Chinaman to play for England,
     his distribution was worse than Group 4 security. He's lucky he wasn't
     born a spastic because he just can't use his feet. 
    
     On the plus side - 
    
    there is no plus side. It may aswel snow til next summer, when it can
    snow then aswel for all I care.
    
    
    Gary - cheesed off -
129.887On our way to the USAOSLACT::HENRIKWMaking the most of miseryThu Oct 14 1993 12:338
129.888Norway on their way...KBOMFG::KOEPPECounting the days...Thu Oct 14 1993 12:5217
	First of all, congratulations to Norway !!!!

	I was really surprised that the German ref didn't send Koeman
	off. In the Bundesliga that ref wouldn't have hesitated one second
	to show the red card. I agree the refereeing was bad (from the few
	scenes I saw), but the ref can't be blamed for England loosing.

	I can't see Poland winning against Holland and it wouldn't
	surprise me if England score 7 against San Marino just to get rid of
	their frustration.
	If things go really bad there won't be any team from the British
	Isles (including Ireland ;-)) in the US next year, but I hope not.
	Has that ever happened before?

	Just my opinion

	Eduard
129.889Yes, I knew...2-0....UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Thu Oct 14 1993 12:5518
    Exciting game, the luckiest won ( as Wouters stated just after the
    game). The luck we miss against other teams ( Norway, Poland) is coming
    back to us in almost every England game. I can imagine that you get
    Hollandsick as England fan ; it started in the game in the EC '88.
    Holland won 3-1, England hit the post twice. Two years later during the
    world championships a clear goal ( free kick) wasn't counted. Well and
    the last two games are to fresh in memory to see the luck.
    Yes, perhaps we had the better team but in the first half we were a
    bunch of nervous unsure players. England had the best chances. In the
    second half then it finally got decided.
    I think both teams deserved to go through but both had made to many
    failures before this game. And still it is not clear who is going to
    the US. Norway looked during the whole the best team, they didn't make
    the mistakes and go rightfully through !
    Pity that this victory has this strange scent of decisions of the
    referee......
    
    John
129.890Sweden & Norway on the way..!BCFI::PIHLSTROMThe bowsprit looks forwardThu Oct 14 1993 12:5916
    
    NU (Nordic Union)
    
      \                                \                    \
       \      /\                        \      /\            \      /\
    :. /_____/  \_                   :) /_____/  \_       :> /_____/  \_
      /      \                         /      \             /      \
     / (DEN)  \                       / (SWE)  \           / (NOR)  \
     \        /                       \        /           \        /
             /_                               /_                   /_
    
    Hey Norway..!
    We must wait for our friends in Denmark before we go to the US!
    
    The Swedish Swagman
                       
129.891FORTY2::ROBERTSONCan't think of a decent personal nameThu Oct 14 1993 13:2432
re-.2

>> Two years later during the world championships a clear goal ( free kick)
>> wasn't counted

John,

That Free kick ( by Pearce ) was unfortunately an indirect free kick, and it
didn't touch anyone on the way into the goal, hence the reason it was disallowed.

My comments about last night, it's all been said before:

	1. Rijkaard's goal should have counted.

	2. Koeman should have walked, though not a penalty.

	3. If 2 had happened he wouldn't have scored. But who's to say someone
	   else wouldn't have??

	4. England lacked any flair, or imagination. The only time they came
	   close to scoring was from free kicks just outside the box ( Dorigo &
	   Merson )

	5. Why the hell did Taylor take Merson off for Wright. With 20 minutes
	   left to save your world cup campaign, needing at least 2 goals, you
	   take off a midfielder/defender and stick an extra forward on. I know
	   England still can qualify ( mathematically ) but I cannot see Poland
	   beating the Dutch.

	6. The Dutch were the better team.

Al
129.892CUCKOO::SMITHP1Radio Gnome InvisibleThu Oct 14 1993 13:3819
	What are you lot on ?? The only reason last nights game was
	exciting was because the winner almost definitely made sure
	of a place in the 94 World Cup finals.

	The game itself was as dull as I've seen this season (except
	possibly Man.City v Oldham), except for the 'was it/wasn't it' 
	penalty controversies.

	The English team looked like eleven footballers that had never
	even seen each other before, let alone played on the same team.
	They play Wimbledon style, but saying that, Wimbledon do it much
	better.

	...and as for Taylor's team selection.......<sounds of wailing
	and much gnashing of teeth>

		p1
	
129.893FORTY2::FOWLERMCome the glorious dayThu Oct 14 1993 13:4021
Obviously, I am completely gutted.

At least whoever takes over as England manager won't have to worry about
competitive football for years, because we qualify for the next European
championships automatically. Plenty of time to build a decent team (just like
Taylor had).

Koeman should be shot at the very least, and I certainly won't be supporting the
Dutch in the USA, because I am a bad, nay, abysmal loser.

The only hint of silver lining to this cloud is the fact that if we did have to
miss a World Cup, at least we picked the right one. The World Cup in USA indeed.
Stupid idea anyway.

Perhaps it was a cunning plan on the part of Graham to avoid the embarrassment
of having to explain our beloved sport to the handful of Americans who express
an interest when they're not playing rounders.

I was right about the Dutch defence though....  8-)

Mike
129.894England are out.!!!ESSB::MCUNNIFFEEven Better than the Real ThingThu Oct 14 1993 13:4618
    Holland 2 England 0

Congratulations to Holland on a great win that had me on the edge of my seat.
It was great to see Turnip head Taylor in such anguish at the end. He 
complained about Koeman not walking but nobody mentioned that Rikjkard had
a perfectly legitimate goal disallowed.

No doubt Koeman should have walked but it was even more satisfying for me
when he went down the other end and lobbed the ball into the corner after
Seaman had invited him to place it there. The second goal was a cracker from
Berkhamp and England are out of the world cup.

I was very disappointed after the Spanish game but things ended on a high.



 C U N N O
129.895Cunno to the rescue.....SIOG::A_KELLYThu Oct 14 1993 13:5611
    
    re .894
    
    I thought Ireland's dismal performance would have stamped out any
    anti-English arrogance in this note, but then again I might have
    guessed Cunno would carry the flag for the "England haters".
    
    By the way which club team do you support?  Liverpool you say.....
    
    
    Thet were ENGLISH last time I looked......
129.896KERNEL::WITHALLGEven Better Than The Real ThingThu Oct 14 1993 13:5717
    
    
     Cunno,
    
    
     1 ) change yopur personal name you poaching unpatriotic mother.
    
     2 ) it was even more satisfying for me when he went down the other end
    and lobbed the ball into the corner......
    
    
    And you have your own note ???????.
    
    
    Choke and die. ;-)
    
    
129.897PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURThu Oct 14 1993 14:0817
    
    There's no good saying what should have been, were more or less
    out unless Poland can turn over the Dutch in Poland. How did that big fat
    defender stay on the pitch, the ref must still be a bit p***** off
    about the war..  
    
    Dissapointed about the reaction of the Dutch Police, England fans were
    picked off the street for not even doing anything. Maybe they should
    have all purchased a pair of clogs and gone busking outside the ground
    before kick off. Its not right that you get thrown into a van just
    because your enjoying yourself. Looking at the news last night the
    Dutch didn't seem very friendly either, one scene showed some poor
    English man getting the kicking of his life..And that must hurt 
    being kicked in the teeth by lumps of wood, he's probably got bad
    splinters in his gumbs now...                       
    
     Andy..B
129.898ESSB::PHAYDENThu Oct 14 1993 14:5515
    
    
    
    
    re: .895 Hear Hear !!!!!
    
    I'm not supporting Mr. Cunno but if you ever wanted a reason as to why the
    English team are disliked so much (here) just replay the post match interviews
    given by both Platt & Taylor. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !!!!!!!!!!!!
    and compare them to the dignified and well balanced interviews give by
    Jack & the Irish players.
    It's not your fault, I know, but when the face of English football is a
    whinging git it's hard to support them.
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt).
129.899Maybe an Irish ref would have been better :-)ISEPUB::CHAMPOLLIONCan-tas-ticThu Oct 14 1993 15:076
129.900YUPPY::PANESA heart of gold, and a knob of butterThu Oct 14 1993 15:097
   Was Sharpe playing???

   Will David Van Seaman ever play for England again?

   Questions questions,

   Stuart
129.901Seaman - England No'1KERNEL::WITHALLGEven Better Than The Real ThingThu Oct 14 1993 15:199
    
    Dave Seaman pulled off a blinder, I would have bet my mortgage that
    Rijkaard would have tucked that one away. As for the 2nd goal...
    
    Couldn't say, he didn't stop it thats for sure, but then Bergkamp
    didn't intend Seaman to stop it.
    
    
    
129.902The better, luckier team won on the nightKBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Thu Oct 14 1993 15:238
   Well its no longer in your hands, I can understand how ye feel similar to
how I felt at 5pm. As everyone said Holland were the better team and had also
a little bit more luck, that's football.

Re .881 Rob that was a very fair analysis.

                                                                  -dave-
129.903predictableDBSUK2::GRICEPhil Grice DBS Sustaining EngineeringThu Oct 14 1993 15:2619
A few comments about last night. The Koeman incident was interesting for a
number of reasons. The ref immediately headed off pointing to the penalty spot
but then looked over to the linesman. According to the tv the linesman also 
said it was a penalty but the ref then seem to bow to Koeman's efforts at 
pointing outside the box.

Now contrast that to the Walker foul in the first game between these two at 
Wembley. Walker started his foul well outside the box but the guy fell over 
inside. (Did Walker walk - I can't remember). Koeman seemed to get his yellow
card as an after thought by the ref.

Overall I'm not surprised. And at least I'll be able to watch the World Cup in
a relaxed aloof mood, watching the Irish (if they get there) get some more
interminable draws.:^) Thank God we don't have to qualify for the European 
Championships.

I hope the Welsh get there

/phil
129.904DBSUK2::GRICEPhil Grice DBS Sustaining EngineeringThu Oct 14 1993 15:274
Oh and regards Seaman. Well even Brian More knew what he was going to do with 
the ball and there was an awful lot of space on the left of the goal.

/phil
129.905KERNEL::WITHALLGEven Better Than The Real ThingThu Oct 14 1993 15:448
    
    -1.
    
     Yeh, and had he covered the left there would be even more space to
    the right !.   Somehow Seaman won't win this one.
    
    
     Gazzer.
129.906Lee BluntYUPPY::ASHLEYSMITHbeen in a daze for daysThu Oct 14 1993 16:3011
    Holland were the better side. Players such as Sinton and Palmer are
    simply not upto this standard of football especially when Taylor
    appears to play them in positions to which they are not accustomed.
    
    Lee Sharpe was a complete embarrassment and I am pleased that people
    will now realise what an overated player he is. 
    
    Looking forward to watching the Cricket next summer.
    
    Andy
    
129.907SIOG::HOWARDThu Oct 14 1993 16:343
    The double save from Seaman has to rank alongside Banks' save against
    Brazil 1970....
    Amazing....
129.908ARRODS::OHAGANBSky-high....6000 miles wayThu Oct 14 1993 16:505
    No chance for Merson to show a World Cup Finals audience his brilliance
    until 1998. Depressing that is.  
    
    barry.
                                    
129.909SIOG::HOWARDThu Oct 14 1993 17:092
    anyone care to post a few of the headlines from the British gutter
    press....we all need cheering up
129.910Win the game and we were on the plane - SUNPIECES::63585::PCDEFAULTPlace holder for NOTESThu Oct 14 1993 17:1933
The SUN says OUTRAGED Taylor fury as Killer
Koeman robs England on it's back page.
CHEATED OUT OF IT screams it's match report, 
with Ref Sparks spot-kick fury as it's 
sub-title.

The next page has 4 pictures showing WHY KOEMAN
SHOULD HAVE GONE.

The next page says FIFA MUST PROBE THIS SCANDAL REF
by John Sadler on the night the whole world fell in
on England. 

There is also a HOW WE RATED section, with marks out of ten.

Seaman 6
Parker 6
Dorigo 6
Palmer 5
Adams 8
Pallister 8
Platt 7
Merson 7
Shearer 6
Sharpe 6
Ince 7
Sinton 6
Wright 6


Not that I have seen The Sun of course!!

Chris.
129.911Whipping boys qualify -but not usSUTRA::WARDThu Oct 14 1993 17:379
    The real shame of all this is that a lot of lesser teams from odd parts
    of the world will go to the US, more or less to be whipping boys,
    whilst several of the worlds/Europe's better sides might languish at
    home. What price the European Championship being of better quality than
    the world cup?
    
    PS Taylor must go - but who would replace him??
    
    Paul
129.912No justice in the worldOSLACT::HENRIKWMaking the most of miseryThu Oct 14 1993 17:486
    >>The real shame of all this is that a lot of lesser teams from odd parts
    >>of the world will go to the US, more or less to be whipping boys,
    >>whilst several of the worlds/Europe's better sides might languish at
    >>home.
    
    I know how you feel. We used to be bad losers, too. ;^)
129.913Well done Holland and good luck in the states.ECCGY4::HAIGHIf voting ever solved anything, they'd ban it.Thu Oct 14 1993 18:0126
    
    	The officials were bad, apart from Rijkards disallowed goal, most
    of the bad decisions seemed to go against England. I'm suprprised that
    no one has mentioned the atrocious tackle from the second Koeman on
    Parker 60 seconds after the first Koeman should have been sent off.
    What surprises me is that seeing the Bundesliga every week, the refs
    hand out yellow and red cards like they're going out of fashion. Yet
    last night he seemed to have forgotten the red card entirely.
    
    	Also the free kick that England got out of the Koeman/Platt
    incident, was a farce as the dutch defender was about 3 yards from the
    ball as it was taken. Koeman got to retake the free kick at the other
    end when Ince ran out and we all know what happened after that! 
    
    	Seaman may have made a good save or two, but was at least partially
    to blame for both of Hollands goals. It would be unfair to blame him
    alone though. 
    
    	All that aside, Holland were the better team and deserved their
    win. England failed to qualify because of the result at Wembley. Taylor
    must now go, and I bet he'll want no more of the ridicule heaped on him
    by the sad English media.
    
    	It must be a hollow victory for the Dutch manager as he will be
    replaced in the states by J.C., who seems to have been sent from
    heaven!
129.914GALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Thu Oct 14 1993 18:4111
    
    Saw the 2nd half in a Dublin pub.  Great game.  I thought the better
    side won but the referee was a disgrace.  Koeman should have walked.
    
    Holland still have to draw in Poland.  That's not a foregone conclusion
    but the Dutch should qualify now.
    
    England drew at hoem to Holland and Norway, lost away to both sides and
    can have no complaints.
    
    Gary.
129.915moved for your convenienceGALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Thu Oct 14 1993 20:5920
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 325.0                    Start all over again                    No replies
REDARO::WLC_IMPROV1                                  14 lines  14-OCT-1993 16:54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I watched the Holland V England football match last night and was
    absolutely gutted with the final result.I am sure there are plenty
    of other people feeling the same way,who just cannot believe it.
    Ronald Koeman should have definetly been sent off for pulling David
    Platt down and we were so unlucky not to score after hitting the 
    post twice and having one saved off the line.This game will be 
    talked about for some time to come for what might and should of been.
    We have to look to a new manager who can DO the job and build a good 
    foundation and produce a winning team for the World Cup in 1998.
     
      All comments welcome,
                           regards,
                                    M.m.
                               
129.916Koemans - Man of the MatchCOKPIT::DSMITHGazza's my hero...NOT!!!!!Thu Oct 14 1993 21:5542
    
    re .805
    
   " A victory for justice, and England climb righteously back into the top
    3 international teams."
    
     Oh dear, how sad, too bad!!!
    
    re .812
    
     "the thought of World Cup Football without us taking  part doesnt bare
      thinking about"
    
     Believe me, the thought of WC football without England is very
     comforting indeed. No more nationalistic crap from the Beeb and the 
     press. Ecstasy!!!
    
     re .893
    
     "Koeman should be shot at the very least"
    
      Not Koemans fault, he did what 99% of footballers would have done in
     a similar position. What the ref did or didn't do is nowt to do with
     Koemans.
    
     re .911 
    
     "The real shame of all this is that a lot of lesser teams from odd
    parts of the world will go to the US, more or less to be whipping boys"
    
     That's why it's called the WORLD CUP. Teams from all over the world
     are invited to try and qualify. Why should the "big boys" qualify all
     the time. By the way, would you include the USA as whipping boys?
    
     I don't know what all the aggro about Koemans tackle is about. The ref
     made a bad decision, he should of booked Platty for throwing himself
     to the ground as if he had been shot. Never even a free kick!!!
    
     Face up to it guys, you were beaten fair and square. Sometimes
     decisions go for you, sometimes against you. That's life.
    
     Danny.
129.917Stop Moaning.PAKORA::AMILLARAnd some late news just in...Thu Oct 14 1993 23:5717
    
    I thought Platt over reacted to his jersey being pulled, and dived into
    the box. He should have been booked for it.
    When the Dutch player ran from the wall, it was after much running
    about by English forwards, although it was before the ball was kicked.
    The other incident at the Dutch free kick was more blatant. The English
    defender ran out just when the Dutchman started his run, and without
    any distractions from the other Dutch players.
    
    As for the violence, and talking about the innocent being lifted along
    with the guilty, I do not blame the Dutch authorities for what they
    did. They decided to stop the destruction of their cities before it
    started, and given the previous record of the English fans, I say it
    was the right thing to do.
    
    Archie
    
129.918PAKORA::AMCARTHURandrew 789 8225Fri Oct 15 1993 00:5622
    RE -1
    
    Quite correct Archie...
    
    Dont allow the hooligans ( no matter where they come from ) to do what
    they want. This behaviour by so called football fans has went on too
    long. Personally, I would have banned England from the Finals.There 
    fans ( although not only their fans are guilty ) cannot be trusted.
    Even if there were a hard core of thugs out there causing
    havoc,something had to be done. Well done the Dutch police.
    
    Its just a pity that real football fans end up tarred with the same
    brush.
    
    Did anyone hear how harsh the sentences were on the thugs that were in
    court today ?
    
    As for the football.....England were beaten by a better team. The 
    management should have taken defeat with dignity instead of their
    pathetic outbursts after the match. Taylor really is a sad.
    
    
129.919Additional infoUTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Fri Oct 15 1993 12:3526
    Perhaps nice to know, some reactions from the ref ( saw it in my
    newspaper this morning) :
    
    Rijkaards goal : Took over the reaction of the linesman
    Koeman : For sure no red card. There was not a goalthreatening
    situation because there was another dutch player (?) around.
    Penalty ? Was my first reaction but the linesman corrected me.
    Wouters ( who else...) ran to fast out ? No way. There was enough space
    to shoot !
    Penalty on the other side ? Could be.
    Was taken over because Ince was running when Koeman was running. The
    distance during the shot was to close !
    My performance ? Reasonably well for such an important match.
    
    For so far mr Asschenbacher ( and not me !).
    
    Reaction dutch police : there was a rule used, like Ton said before
    that everyone could been arrested that looked 'ready for vandalism.'
    That means that the individual policeman can arrest anyone he/she
    dislikes and that can lead to doubtfull decisions. I don't know if that
    is a solution to hooliganism. More a move to a sort of police-state....
    
    Punishement for arrested ? Seven were put to trial yesterday ; one
    free, the other six got a small 'fee' before being released. Some are
    in english jail and dutch fans will be trialed in january.....
    Conclusion ; trials were fast but not very hard on them......
129.920Their soft under that hard exterior shell...GAOV10::MURPHYFri Oct 15 1993 13:1816
    I was  watching ITV last night.On it they were showing the English
    hooligans arriving back to England where they had to go through a
    gauntlet of reporters and cameramen.Most of them were covering their
    faces with their jackets but I was amazed that their were men in their 
    (what looked to me)in their sixties and Women arrested also.
    But lets spare a thought for one English hooligan about six foot tall
    with a shaved head and as mean looking as they come who broke down into
    tears when the cameras were filming him.(maybe he just heard the result
    from Amsterdam)
    
    
    Regards,
    
    Anthony.
    "
    -
129.921Count me in for devolution!FORTY2::ETHERIDGEOooh! Turned out nice again.Fri Oct 15 1993 13:3613
129.922England fans, pathetic...BCFI::SCHOTTMickey Mouse is a ratFri Oct 15 1993 14:2135
    
    Pathetic...
    
    In clear memory the notes and comments before this group started off:
    England-only-next-to-god and Holland go to USA without problems, Poland
    can be an upset, to pick a point, but the rest are only C-nations...
    You thought Norway would roll over and play dead as soon as the big
    team in this world would show up.
    As it turned out Norway was no puppy but rather a wolf who bit your
    a***s. Now you weep like sissies about bad referies and unfair play...
    
    Pathetic...
    
    re .911
    
    Your "wipping boys", is that the likes of Norway, Cameroon and USA?
    Ten times out of ten I prefer those before a bunch of defenders.
    Come now, weeping about other teams taking your place...
    It is a _world_ cup and we will do fine without England.
    
    As to the "fans". If I were a _real_ fan I would just not be seen with
    those thugs - thus not arrested. If you go with them you are one
    yourself. Dump them in a cell and throw away the key.
    
    *** Congrats to Norway, you deserve to go to the finals ***
    
    I for sure will not go about as like Sweden has already won the finals.
    We have qualified and thats fine. If we do well in US thats better, if
    not - well there are always other teams to enjoy, like Brasil,
    Cameroon, Norway, Denmark  and France (hope they go through).
    I enjoy _fotball_.
    
    Hermann
    (sorry for this burst-out, it won't happen again) ;-) 
    
129.923SUBURB::WAITEGSIMPLY THE BESTFri Oct 15 1993 14:258
    Re 922
    
    So if you go abroad to watch England that makes you a holigan does
    it???  You are a pratt who is just trying to get a reaction.
    
    I thank you all
    
    Gary
129.924Reasoned argument. Sod it, bring out the xenophobia.FORTY2::ETHERIDGEOooh! Turned out nice again.Fri Oct 15 1993 14:316
129.925Holigans, yuck!BCFI::SCHOTTMickey Mouse is a ratFri Oct 15 1993 14:327
    
    re .923
    
    If I go abroad to watch England, I go abroad to watch England, not to
    run around with holigans.
    
    Hermann
129.926IMAPC::MURRAYFri Oct 15 1993 14:406
    
    re.923
    
    which I think he got Gary :)
    
    Paul
129.927Norway-Enjoy it while it lasts :-)GVA05::BURKHALTERFri Oct 15 1993 14:4011
    Norway wont even get past the first round at the World Cup....
    
    ....as always it'll be either Germany,Brazil,Italy,Argentina or Holland
    that will win it...
    
    .....small nations can not have the strength in depth in case of
    injuries etc etc...
    
    ....Denmark last year was the exception that proves the rule.
    
    -Dom
129.928People still thinks we live in the past...BCFI::PIHLSTROMThe bowsprit looks forwardFri Oct 15 1993 15:0515
                         
     Hmmm...
    
     What Cameroon did in the last WC I think Norway can do in this WC.
     And even go to a final against...well it doesnt matter!
     (If it not are Sweden of course..!)
     
     Where is "Drillos" Nobelprice..?
    
     The Swedish Swagman 
    
                         P.S (The World is DYNAMIC not static!)
    
    
    
129.929ITS ALL OVERPEKING::WELLERMFri Oct 15 1993 16:4325
    
    Back to the hooligan issue.....I'm not making exscuses for English
    supporters..(a term I use lightly).but how the Dutch supporters
    manage to get flares (not the trouser type) into the ground is 
    beyond me..and manage to throw them onto the pitch..?? 
    
    As for the football..England were beaten by the better side..Seamen
    was a fault for both goals..our tactics were all wrong..again..We 
    expected everything to go down the wings..it didn't..both goals and
    the one not given came from attacking the down the middle..all of
    Berkamps attacks came straight down the middle...Proving my point
    that our centre backs are to simular..both are ball winners doing
    the same job..saying that Tony Adams's form has been the best thing
    that has come out of these games....we were so pre-occupied with
    looking for the wingers it left gapping holes through the middle which
    someone with Berkamps speed and thought loved..our centre backs aren't
    the quickest things on two legs so why not play Adams winning the ball
    and walker picking up peices behind him..I'm a Man Utd supporter and
    rate Pallister highly but I still thinks he lacks something when it
    comes to Internationals...Another thing did someone tell Sharpe the
    wrong tactics when it came to corners and free kicks..?? at corners
    he was knocking them in at near post when everyone was far..???
    and our free kicks into the box were terrible..10 mins to go we send
    both our centre backs up and what does Sharpe do ..he hardly reaches
    the box and gives the ball away..well thats that off my chest
129.930Goodbye Turnip Head!!!PEKING::MCKIENNICKFri Oct 15 1993 17:016
    
    On the Lunchtime news; Poland will field a YOUNG Inexperienced Side
    against Holland. This is the start of thier preperation for the next
    European Championships.
    
     NICK.
129.931WHAT !!!CHEFS::HARRISRGreat things are afoot!Fri Oct 15 1993 17:389
    Surely Fifa will do something about that. Poland will not field their
    strongest side, thus depriving England of even the smallest chance of
    qualifying. If a club team fields an under strength team in the league,
    in preperation for a cup game, then the FA throw the book at them. So
    what is the difference ? Poland have basically rolled over and said
    that Holland can go to the US and sod England. Well, we're glad we know
    who our friends sre. 
    
    A rather irate Rich.
129.932BUSSTP::DREESFri Oct 15 1993 18:0811
    
    Re.last
    
    It's a sad reflection on English football when you have to rely on
    what Poland might or might not do to send you to the W.C.
    
    As an earlier noter pointed out England managed to draw at home to
    Holland and Norway and lose both away ties. That is why there NOT 
    going to the W.C.
    
    Del
129.933Picture this...BCFI::PIHLSTROMThe bowsprit looks forwardFri Oct 15 1993 18:4510
129.934FORTY2::FOWLERMCome the glorious dayFri Oct 15 1993 19:175
Pardon?

You and reality aren't close friends are you?

Mike
129.935Pole VaultsGVA05::BURKHALTERFri Oct 15 1993 19:323
    The Poles must have been suffering from Amnesia in '73 then....;-)
    
    -Dom
129.936UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funFri Oct 15 1993 20:1019
129.937Stranger things have happend!GVA05::BURKHALTERSun Oct 17 1993 20:157
    ...well I wonder what they said....?
    
    Anyway the big irony will be that Poland beat Holland 1-0 and we
    only beat San Marino 6-0 and Holland still go through...........
    .......Graham Taylor leaves the country for ever...:-)
    
    -Dom
129.938Another kick in the teeth !ESSB::PHAYDENWed Oct 20 1993 12:4813
     
    F.I.F.A
    
    "After analysing the performance of Karl-Josef Assenmacher...
    the F.I.F.A referees committe has decided to replace (him)
    with Hellmut Krug of Germany for the game between Belgium 
    and the Czech and Slovakian republics on November 17"
    
    It only gets worse !!!!!

    Will Taylor lose all dignity and beg for a replay ? I wonder ...
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt)
129.939was he THAT badNEWOA::FIDO_TConation is the keyWed Oct 20 1993 13:268
    Apart from the truly awful mistake of failing to send Koemans off, did
    Assenmacher really have such a bad game ? He made some other mistakes
    such as booking Ince for encroachment at a free kick when the Dutch had
    got away with it earlier, but overall I would have said that he wasn't
    too bad. Disallowing Rijkaard's goal was based on a linesman's decision
    and so he can't be blamed for that.
    
    	Terry
129.940He's either good enough, or he is'nt....SIOG::A_KELLYWed Oct 20 1993 14:1519
    
    I think the call for a replay is going to happen (although I personally
    don't feel it should or will take place) because FIFA have now left
    themselves wide open to it......
    
    Think about it logically (if that's possible in this note :^)  ).....
    
    By removing Herr Assenmacher (how could he fail to make an Ass of
    things with a name like that) FIFA have declared he is unfit to ref at
    this level.
    By the same token he could not have been fit to ref the Holland vs
    England game. 
    The result is therefore null and void and the game should be replayed.
    
    Before the flames fly thick and fast, this is *not* my opinion, just a
    simple analysis of the facts. How do these people in FIFA get their
    jobs????
    
    Cheers.....Ned
129.941GYMAC::DCASSIDYWed Oct 20 1993 14:209
    
    This is something that is I'm afraid going to happen more an more...
    we already had Zimbabwe and Eqypt ...looking like Morrocco v Zambia..
    
    and now England v Holland...
    
    Dezzz.
    
    
129.942But do you want a replay ?ESSB::PHAYDENWed Oct 20 1993 14:3115
                                              
    re: .940 
    
    That's fair comment !
    
    I don't know but if England do appeal they should & could very well
    get a replay. The logic in .940 makes perfect sense.
    
    And just when you thought Taylor was gone, he gets another 
    bite at the cherry. 
    Like they say, you can't get rid of a bad thing !
    
    The next day or two should be interesting.
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt). 
129.943A replay is highly unlikely...PAVONE::TURNERWed Oct 20 1993 14:3227
     re: .939
    
    I rather fear that things don't work like that in FIFA-land.
    
    A precedent: the European Cup Winners' Cup final in 1973. Leeds lost
    1-0 to AC Milan after dominating the match for 86 minutes. The referee
    (a Greek) made some astounding decisions (e.g. he booked Paul Madeley
    for time-wasting in the dying minutes when Leeds were losing 1-0!!)
    
    UEFA spent about six months investigating the referee, so convinced
    were they that he'd taken bribes from AC Milan (Italian football's
    reputation back in the seventies was shady to say the least). Well,
    they couldn't pin anything on him (shat a surprise!), but they banned
    him anyway from ever refereeing another international football match.
    
    And AC Milan continued guzzling champagne from the cup. Inter Milan
    fans  still delight in using this game (together with the Marseille
    floodlight scandal) to put down AC Milan as a club.
    
    Unless opposing fans pelt your goalkeeper with grapeshot while he's
    facing a penalty, you've got a fat chance of getting the game replayed.
    In other words, suspending a ref is no admission of guilt on FIFA's
    part.
    
    Dom
    
    
129.944How do we prevent these "International Incidents"?BERN02::GOODEJWed Oct 20 1993 15:25126
129.945ESSB::PHAYDENWed Oct 20 1993 15:416
     
    re: last
    
    Great note. Mail it to to FIFA.
                 
    Peter(An Impartial Celt).
129.946Food for thought.PAVONE::TURNERWed Oct 20 1993 16:5737
    re: .944
    Yep, a lot of good things in that note. I quite agree with the view
    that defenders have got to be punished to the point that they'll think
    twice about stopping attackers by foul means. 

    And yet, the legislation continues to favour the defending team.
    Perhaps this should be carried on in another note, but it always makes
    me roar when referees take a inconsistent view of pushing by
    attackers vs. pushing by defenders. As for the commitment to
    "protecting" goalkeeper when he goes up for a high ball with a forward!
    If you're worried about getting a knee in the back/ribs when you're
    jumping with arms outstretched, then go up with your head like everyone
    else! In other words, goalkeepers enjoy enough protection as it is.
    
    >Surely the use of TV cameras and action-replay equipment to allow
    >one or more referees to monitor games has to be sanctioned soon. The
    >USA World Cup would be an ideal place to start. The improvement in
    >off-side decisions alone has to be worth it - Rijkaard was yards on
    >side!
    
    Agreed. This equipment has got to be the next innovation in the game.
    That's if we really want progress. At present, the International
    Cricket Federation seems to be a more progressive organization than
    FIFA!
    
    >It pisses me off to see cheating go unpunished regardless of who are
    >the guilty party and victim. It pisses me off even more to hear people
    >gloating when their team gets away with it - they would be the first to
    >whinge if their team was the victim.
    
    Just cast your mind back (those who can) to the reaction of the Oirish
    in this conference when Holland (again!) eliminated Eire from the 1988
    European Championships with a disputed offside goal from Kieft. The
    Gaelic equivalent of "we wuz robbed" featured in every note for about
    the next month! 
    
    Dom
129.947Blame the Irish!SIOG::FITZPATRICKWed Oct 20 1993 17:1623
>>    Just cast your mind back (those who can) to the reaction of the Oirish
>>    in this conference when Holland (again!) eliminated Eire from the 1988
>>    European Championships with a disputed offside goal from Kieft. The
>>    Gaelic equivalent of "we wuz robbed" featured in every note for about
>>    the next month! 
    
    Dom,
	Definitely NOT true. You have a very fertile imagination to fuel your
	National Front racist fervour.

	For the record, most Irish people accepted this defeat in good
	spirit. True, there was disappointment that we went out to an off-side
	goal, but most reasonable people (we are, over here) accepted that
	Holland were the better side on the day.

	Most Irish people cheered for Holland in the subsequent matches.

	Everybody really enjoyed that Championship and there were NO
	recriminations.

	After all, we won the match that mattered to us.

	Michael.
129.948SIOG::HOWARDWed Oct 20 1993 17:421
    well said that man
129.949NEWOA::FIDO_TConation is the keyWed Oct 20 1993 17:4916
    Re the use of cameras to help the referee make decisions :
    
    The reason that cameras can be used in cricket and US Football is that
    these games have a natural break ( i.e. the ball becomes dead ) and so
    there is time to review decisions.
    
    In football, this is not the case, so there isn't always time to review
    the decision. Take the case of a shot which hits the bar and
    does/doesn't cross the line ( a la 1966 World Cup final ) and then the
    defence clears it upfield and scores on the breakaway. Unless the
    referee blows as the ball does/doesn't cross the line ( to say "I'm not
    sure" ? ), the game will continue. If he blows and the replay shows
    that it din't cross the line, how is the game restarted ? Is it a goal
    to the other side ?
    
    Terry
129.950Remember?PAVONE::TURNERWed Oct 20 1993 17:5321
    re: .947, .948
    >Definitely NOT true. You have a very fertile imagination to fuel your
    >National Front racist fervour.
    
    First of all, I think the National Front/BNP is a *despicable*
    organization. An apology would be nice, but I don't expect one.
    
    Secondly, I remember that period as though it were yesterday - and
    whingeing was the order of the day. I also remember it because I too
    thought the goal was offside and allegations pointed to a political
    FIFA decision designed to ensure Holland's place in the semi-finals (a
    nation with more "pulling" power) rather than Ireland's.
    
    And while we're on the subject, I have strong Irish roots myself. I'm
    simply disappointed at the provocative/arrogant/racist views of many
    fully-fledged Irish noters in this conference whenrever England are
    concerned.
    
    Clear?
    
    Dom
129.951Enough already !ESSB::PHAYDENWed Oct 20 1993 18:024
    
    Here we go again. Just give it a bloody rest !
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt)
129.952Irish can dish it out, but can't take it!!PEKING::COSSEYNWed Oct 20 1993 18:225
     
    Yeh, you know how sensitive the Irish are.....
    
    Neil...
    
129.953CLADA::DODONNELLNothing personal.It's just business.Wed Oct 20 1993 18:327
    
    Well of course we claimed "we wuz robbed" because we were robbed. But
    there was none of the whinging and moaning that some of you are doing.
    And Charlton didn't come across afterwards as a pathetic, whinging
    idiot like Taylor.
    
    Denis.
129.954Loads of Shi*e TalkESSB::BLONGUNITED Premier League CHAMPIONS 1993Wed Oct 20 1993 18:434
129.955PEKING::COSSEYNWed Oct 20 1993 18:449
    
    Taylor's an idiot, but lets face it, his job was on line and now could
    face the sack because of a diabolical mistake by an offcial who wasn't
    up to job. I'm sure anyone faced with this possibillity would have
    acted in simiular manor. Then again if your Irish or Scottish you
    would have gone down the pub had a few pints and forgot about it.
    BOLLOCKS!!!
    
    NEIL..
129.956Time will tellUBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJAnd then there were none...Wed Oct 20 1993 18:4510
129.957Yep, you wuz robbed. Sure.PAVONE::TURNERWed Oct 20 1993 18:5517
    re: .953
    >Well of course we claimed "we wuz robbed" because we were robbed. But
    >there was none of the whinging and moaning that some of you are doing.
    >And Charlton didn't come across afterwards as a pathetic, whinging
    >idiot like Taylor.
    
    Yeh, I guess that says it all really. 
    
    Rule 1: don't say *anything* negative about the Irish (unless you want to 
    be accused of having National Front sympathies in a public notesfile by
    someone who's never set eyes on you before).
    
    Personally, I think Platt should have been sent off for diving. Now
    where's my camel?
    
    Dom
     
129.958Dom you sound sad man....KBOMFG::TANNERU2 are Numbed!!!!!!!!!!!Wed Oct 20 1993 19:2114

   Dom I thinks its natural that we (Irish) folks were upset that Holland went
on to qualify for the Euro 88 semis with an offside goal. But if we were still
bitching about it (as you say ) a month later then tell me why all the Irish 
(a word you have problems spelling) fans at the final supported the Dutch???

  This all happened 5 years ago and it doesn't belong in this topic. Face it Dom
Holland beat ye because they were the better team, just like the Spanish were
better than Ireland.

  Re .952 Neil  You really wonder why your compared to Mr Barefield!!!!!!!!!!!!

                                                                       -dave-
129.959don't...you'll make me cry..BUSSTP::DREESWed Oct 20 1993 19:2219
    
    The sob stories keep coming and coming.....
    
    Unlucky or not, the main reason England won't be going to the W.C is
    because they are simply not good enough. It's about time the English 
    supporters in this topic realised that simple fact. 
    
    You just don't have enough class players to do the biz at international 
    level. (Maybe Denis Wise would have made a difference...NOT!) 
    
    You lost in Holland and Norway and you couldn't beat either of these 
    sides at home. So instead of moaning and blaming the ref it's about
    time you faced the fact that you just don't have the ability at 
    International level.
    
    Del.
    
    
    
129.960CLADA::DODONNELLNothing personal.It's just business.Wed Oct 20 1993 19:3512
    
    Re .957
    
    >Rule 1: don't say *anything* negative about the Irish (unless you want
    >to accused of having National Front sympathies in a public notesfile
    >someone who's never set eyes on you before).
    
    Eh? I never accused you of having National Front sympathies. I may have
    accused you of being a whinger but not of having National Front
    sympathies. ;').
    
    Denis.
129.961PAVONE::TURNERWed Oct 20 1993 19:3730
    re: .958
    >Dom, you sound sad man
    
    Didn't get this at first - I presume you're using sound as a verb, not
    as an adjective? Anyway, the truth is "no, not really". I was
    disappointed when I saw the result come up on teletext here in Italy
    (the match was televised in crypted form and due to interference I
    couldn't even see that!), but I've realised by now that Holland are our
    bogey team. 
    
    And in any case, I think England, Holland and Ireland would all be
    annihilated by the likes of Columbia at the moment. I don't think
    England are a *worse* team than Holland, but I wouldn't have put
    sixpence on the current England team getting past the first round of a
    tournament not held at Wembley. 
    
    >This all happened 5 years ago and it doesn't belong in this topic.
    >Face it Dom Holland beat ye because they were the better team, just
    >like the Spanish were better than Ireland.
    
    Didn't see the game, so can't comment. Possibly, you're right. But the
    theory "we won so we deserved to qualify" doesn't always hold true;
    just ask the inhabitants of Cameroon after the last World Cup!
    
    As for the '88 Euro championships, there are some short memories round
    here! Besides, the Dutch didn't *cheat* any more than Geoff Hurst did
    in '66; the referee/linesmen just made a bad decision. So you would
    have been right to support them in the final.
    
    Dom
129.962No comparison!!PEKING::COSSEYNWed Oct 20 1993 19:3714
    
    We were beaten by a decision that totally changed the game. Ok,they were
    technically better than us but did they deserve to win it..? England
    created more goal scoring oppertunities( ok you need to take chances to
    win games). This game was deceided by a Referee who wasn't up to the
    challenge of a game so important...A draw would have been
    suffient for England and thats the way the game was heading until
    the Ref dropped the biggest boob of his life...Ireland were trounced
    fair and square. England were beaten by a man who failed to carry out
    the rules thats laid out in front of him.
    
    
    Neil..
                                       
129.963UBOHUB::MCKEAVENEYJAnd then there were none...Wed Oct 20 1993 19:474
    
    I think JACKANORY is a suitable word at this time.
    
    
129.964PAVONE::TURNERWed Oct 20 1993 19:5014
    re: .957
    >Eh? I never accused you of having National Front sympathies. I may have
    >accused you of being a whinger but not of having National Front
    >sympathies. ;').
    
    My note didn't refer to you. It was aimed at the author of .947. 
    
    And any whingeing (sp?) I have done concerns the anti-English racket in
    this conference - not a reaction to last Wednesday's game, about which I
    didn't submit a single reply until yesterday (?). 
    
    By all means, check.
    
    Dom
129.965Already one down.....PAKORA::JOWENSWed Oct 20 1993 20:0611
    re 962.
    
     What about the *diabolical* decision by the linesman? ie Giving the
    Rikaard (sp) goal off-side.  Did that just slip your mind that you
    should have been one down anyway.  No, I thought not!
    
     Pass the rose tinted specs please.......8-)
    
      John
    
    
129.966GALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Wed Oct 20 1993 20:165
    
    Can you please clam down and stick to rational discussion.  This is
    getting hysterical.
    
    Gary.
129.967swings & roundaboutsESSB::CONNAIREWed Oct 20 1993 20:267
    Just curious, butfrom what I can gather, the only reason this German
    referee is deemed "incompetent" is that he didn't send Koemans off?
    I don't recall similar "rantings" when the referee in the corresponding 
    game at Wembley didn't send Des Walker to the line for the same
    offence.
    
    BC.
129.968Come on guys, lets just discuss football here.BERN02::GOODEJWed Oct 20 1993 20:2651
    
    
    Re.949
    
    	You have a very valid point there Terry. I was discussing just
    this over lunch today. Both codes of Rugby even have the edge over
    football here because breaks are more frequent.
    
    	Clearly had there been a referee in the stand last Wednesday
    Rijkaard's goal would have been given - he did put it in the net
    and the TV angle showed he was a yard on side when the ball was
    chipped to him. However, what of the case where the ref blows
    for off-side <before> the attacker shoots, but the TV shows he
    would have been on side?? Now his chance is gone! I for one am
    not sure how to handle this and many other similar situations which
    could arise. But I definitely believe that a ref with a TV monitor
    could play a major part in improving the success rate, and therefore
    the fairness, of decisions. Give it a trail is therefore my argument.
    
    Re..recent replies
    
    	I think its pretty likely that most England fans are by now aware
    that their side lost away to Norway and Holland and only managed to
    draw at home. It also seems apparent (to me anyway) that Mr Taylor is
    not well liked and never was (I for one couldn't believe his
    appointment). As such, comments like "Ha ha your team lost, they were
    crap and your manager's a whinger" have less to do with football and
    more with the pathetic desire to "rub it in". Given that we're all
    meant to be colleagues here, couldn't we keep the snide remarks out
    and concentrate on discussing football.
    
    	I for one will be sad that England don't qualify because in a few
    games they have looked exciting (eg. Holland & Poland at Wembley). On
    the other hand Norway have deservedly mastered the group and a World
    Cup with the skills of Roy, G???lit.... etc has to be exciting (IMO).
    There always have to be losers, and sometimes its not easy to accept
    defeat, esspecially where dubious decisions have been made. But I can
    see no excuse for being a gloating winner. If the North win by a
    disputed goal next month I would expect some whinging. I'll certainly
    be doing some myself if Wales go out (after the very dubious free-kick
    which let the Czechs equalise in the dying seconds....). But there's
    no sence in calling the England fans a buch of whiners. I think its a
    shame they were beaten in such a manner, and if I were a Dutch fan, I
    would be glad to have qualified but not too proud of the way it was
    done.
    
    So, better that we discuss football and offer words of encouragement or
    commiseration, but lets cut out the crap.
    
    JBG
    
129.969re:965 WHAT! a pathetic thing to say..PEKING::COSSEYNWed Oct 20 1993 20:3110
    
    re:965
    
    NO, I haven't forgotton about that, but those type of decisions go on
    weekin and weekout and with the referee not being the postion to see
    the incident had to go by the linesman, the differance being, HE WAS IN
    a position to deal with Keomans incident and bottled it. In return
    ENGLAND are almost out of the World Cup...
    
    Neil...with his rose tinted specs firmly on....  
129.970Pax vobiscum (or whatever)PAVONE::TURNERWed Oct 20 1993 20:339
     re: .968
    
    That's the second note posted by Mr. Goode today that I'd nominate for
    the Note of the Year competition (assuming one exists). He's certainly
    showing himself to be the most consistently good noter (no pun
    intended!) if nothing else.
    
    Dom 
    
129.971D Walker - Red card! No question.BERN02::GOODEJWed Oct 20 1993 20:4322
    
    Re .967/.969
    
    	My first reaction was "send him off". I think Des Walker was (he
    seems to have gone off the biol lately) Englands best defender. But
    his foul should definitely have got him sent off. No question. And I
    would recommend more than a single match ban. Then such behaviour
    would stop.
    
    	Some of you may have heard of a guy called Ringer. His put a late
    tackle in on an opponent in an England v Wales Rugby international at
    Twickers back in the early eighties. Although the TV showed that the
    descision was harsh, he never played Rugby for Wales again. In fact his
    "career" was effectively ended.
    
    	I don't recommend quite such harsh punishment (unless deliberate
    intent to injure is proven), however, if we clamp down on the cheaters
    and foulers the game will become simply a spectacle of speed and skill.
    
    JBG
    
    Ps. please keep up the flattery.... 
129.972Players really all crap?HEART::DIDCOCKWed Oct 20 1993 20:5136
    
    	Firstly let me state I have no problem accepting that England are a
    crap football team and are getting the results they deserve.  (I wish it 
    were otherwise,  but I accept it.)
    
    	One of the comments in an earlier note said words to the effect
    that all the players are crap too.  (The note pointing out that Wise
    wouldn't have made any difference).
    
    	While they don't exactly show it in international colours,  I'm
    fairly impressed with at least the following:  Pearce, Ince, R. Jones,
    Gazza, Shearer, Ferdinand, Platt.   In recent memory the following have
    turned reasonable performances too: I. Wright, Walker... I'm sure others
    will argue I could have included Sharpe, Adams etc - that's not the
    point. 
    
    	It seems to me other countries make more from less. This can come
    down to a number of things:
    1) Manager - popular theory - I'd like to see him go.  (I'm a bit
    concerned that we always end up blaming the manager.  When did we last
    have a respected manager?  1970?  Actually IMO it's not since then that
    England have performed CONSISTANTLY.)
    2) The impact of the football league - coaching etc.  Too boring to
    enter into.
    
    	Finally are the England players actually worse then the Irish?
    They (by and large) have the same club backgrounds.  There can't be a
    lot in it - over the full squads.  If I had to stick my neck out I'd
    say on paper England have the `better squad' - but Ireland play to
    their potential better - both tactically and in terms of attitude.
    
           I can't draw any conclusions - but I wanted to challenge the
    statement that the players are all crap - I think some of them could
    play international football if managed/handled right.
    
    Cliff
129.973*:@)KURMA::SWRIGHTBeavis and ButtheadWed Oct 20 1993 23:096
    It all sounds like sour grapes to me......
    England are out so just accept it ..!!! 
    
    
    
    Boris de Ness.
129.974Techno techno technoCHEFS::HARRISRGreat things are afoot!Thu Oct 21 1993 12:2415
    Here's a little idea. If technology is to be introduced into the game,
    then why not have a patch sewn into the front of a players shirt, that
    can be montitored, by a computer, and two people, one for each team,
    hitting a button every time the ball is passed by a player on the team
    they are watching. Then the computer can instantly say if a player was 
    offside, and sound either a hooter or send a message to the ref through
    an earpiece. After match analysis could be made easy if the computer
    can display positions at any time of the match, and run through. If a
    transmitter can be put in the ball, then was the ball over the ine
    decisions could be a thing of the past too.
    
    Good huh, are the guys in research reading this?
    
    Rich.
    
129.975This has gone on too long to be a typoKIRKTN::MPEACOCKThu Oct 21 1993 12:274
    Who is KoemanS? It's like Alan Sugar talking about Tottenham HotspurS
    when he means to say Tottenham Hotspur or Spurs.
    
    Mike 
129.976SIOG::FITZPATRICKThu Oct 21 1993 12:4223
    
>>    First of all, I think the National Front/BNP is a *despicable*
>>    organization. An apology would be nice, but I don't expect one.

	Dom,
		I have no problem apologising if I have said something unfair.
	So, sorry, if National Front was too strong.

	But, do review your notes. To me, at least, they do seem to always
	contain some anti-Irish sentiment (maybe you'd refer to 'winding-up').

	There is a difference between slagging off a team in their topic, for
	a poor performance, over-expectation or whatever, and persistently
	sniping at a race in all topics.

	My comments were directed at you personally, no other noter.

	After all, the topic was discussing the Holland England match. Why
	bring Ireland, yet again, into it?

	Michael.
	(With apologies to all other noters for this BORING note. I reckon
	it would be best to take any other correspondence off-line!).
129.977More techno...KBOMFG::KOEPPECounting the days...Thu Oct 21 1993 12:547
RE .974

	So I guess you could use the GPS

	Global(l) Positioning System to track ball and players!

	Eduard :-) :-)
129.978Sorry - I got a bit carried away !BERN01::BOLGERJerry Bolger.Thu Oct 21 1993 13:5877
    Re .976
    
    
    I'm sure everyone is fully aware that we Irish are totally above
    slagging off the English and their team at any (every) opportunity.
    In fact, I can categorically state that we would never ever concoct a
    slagging opportunity in order to "get our own back" when some of our
    English colleagues (that's right we all work for the same company !)
    come up with something original to slag off our team about !
    
    As football supporters, I guess we should all be well used to having
    our team slagged off (some more than others !). This naturally gives us
    a chance to reciprocate (note that I didn't say retaliate, as that's a
    red-card offence). In fact, I think, up to a point it plays an important 
    role in promoting the healthy rivalry which adds to the atmosphere on
    the terraces (pop along to any derby match !).
    
    So what's the point of all this rambling ?  Well let's take an analogy:
    
    
    Case 1 :
    
        Mr. Chelsea says to Mr. QPR  "Your team are a bunch of geriatrics !"
        
        Mr. QPR replies "Yeah well, my team scored more goals last week
    			 than your team's average IQ"
      
    
    
    Case 2 :
    
        Mr. Chelsea says to Mr. QPR  "Your team are a bunch of geriatrics !"
    
	Mr. QPR replies "I resent that racist remark and while we're on the 
    			 subject I for one think that active members of the 
    			 paramilitary wing of the Pan-European Pro Euthanasia 
    			 Peoples Organisation, should be banned from this 
    			 conference, so that normal God-fearing angelic
    			 people like myself can talk s**t all day long."   
    
    
    
    	The Analogy ?
    
    	Case 1 is IMHO a case of harmless Reciprocation,  a bit like
    	scoring a goal from the resulting free kick !
    
    	Case 2 is, once again IMHO, a case of Retaliation, a bit like
   	borrowing the linesmans flag to stick it down your opponents
    	throat. This should naturally be followed by a "I don't know what I
    	did, but if it make you feel better, I'll apologise".
    
    
    
    You're probably wondering if there is any point at all to this reply.
    Basically, I use this conference to keep up to date on results, and
    also to provide a bit of light relief from the hassles of the average
    working day. I think it would be nice to leave all the confrontations
    and ill-humoured bullshit to one-side when writing in this conference,
    and stick to the entertaining, good-humoured, NON-PERSONAL abuse which
    makes such a good diversion.  Football is, after all, a SPORT. Why
    can't noting be the same ?
    
    
    Sorry if I stepped on any toes in this reply (although I can't see what
    you're upset about). I deliberately left out the smile symbols, so that
    if anyone finds anything too upsetting, they can assume it was meant as
    a joke. (Hint: Sarcasm features quite strongly in the first paragraph!) 
    
    
    Jerry.
    
    
    P.S. Just for the record I am not a member of any of the following:
    
    Sinn Fein, IRA, UVF, National Front, PLO, DUP, UUP, Viinie Jones Fan
    Club, BBC, RTE, etc. etc. ...........
129.979ESSB::PHAYDENThu Oct 21 1993 14:3141
    
    I dunno who said that the English players are *all* crap,
    but they should look again. Most of the players play excellent football
    for their clubs and all it would take is a decent manager to make them
    realise their International potential.
    
    Ian Wright is probably one of the best players/strikers in Europe ditto
    for Shearer. The defense is probably not selected from the best on
    offer but the best *are* there to be found. Gazza was a great player
    and maybe still could be. Ince is a very good mid-fielder. There are
    positions which could be filled by better players but at least the
    players are available. The Engish league, from what I,ve seen this
    season is getting close to being on par with the Italia league for 
    good entertaining football.
    They need a good International team and a nuclear bomb dropped on FA
    H.Q & Lillishall (Spell ?) ,in order for things to progress. Somebody 
    earlier suggested top class managers for all International levels . Great idea ! 
    
    I want to see good football. I even want to see England qualify for and
    win the world cup (when they play the type of football that deserves
    it) England have never been the greatest team in the world. 1966 was
    your greatest hour and you are rightly proud of it, but it is common
    knowledge that it was a pretty woeful world cup appart from that.
    
    I can't agree that the Irish will moan if we lose to N.Ireland. I think
    we feel that it was all in our own hands at Landsdown and we blew it !
    There weren't too many moans when we failed to qualify for the last
    European championships. We had the opportunities, we were the best team
    in our group and we gave it away. The same applies to England this time
    around. You didn't take your chances and you're now paying the
    price.That's tough !!!
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt)
    
    P.S 
    
    1/
    I for one don't find Dom Turners notes offensive.
                          
    2/
    Mr. B Goode. Keep on noting !
129.980Even Germany will fail one day.....GYMAC::DCASSIDYMon Oct 25 1993 21:1331
    
    Well, well, well.....all very interesting stuff....
    
    Just remember this one little snippet...Germany won the 1990 World Cup
    which at the time seemed quite reasonable, as over the 4 weeks of the
    Finals in Italy they were indeed the better team; I think the majority
    of fair minded folk would agree there. What was the result in their
    last qualifying match to get there ??? A skidded shot from Thomas
    Haessler against Wales was all that got them to the finals in the first 
    place.
    
    As somebody said..it's only a SPORT and in most cases this game is
    decided on or CAN be decided on is the kick of a ball or the rub of the
    green....
    
    Let's just try to remember this. A Polish kick of the ball and the
    expected England - San Marino whitewash may still get England there.
    Look how England qualified for Euro '92...a kick of the ball in the
    last 10 minutes......
    
    This game is enjoyable to watch...so what if the results don't always
    come. If they always did come then life would be very boring then
    wouldn't it !!!  Most Bayern Munich, Liverpool, PSV Eindhoven, Rangers
    Real Madrid, Juventus fans are having a lean time of it over the last
    few weeks, few months, few years....success is relative. If Ireland
    don't qualify, for me it'll be a bit of a letdown just in the same way
    as if none of England, Scotland, Wales qualify....I'll STILL watch the
    World Cup though.....
    
    Dezzz.
          
129.981Roxburgh for England ..........BOOZER::RANKINETue Oct 26 1993 04:1545
    
    Well Ive waded through the 100+ notes put in here since the game, and
    must say how pleased I was that someone mentioned that if Koeman should
    have gone (and as a referee I say he should have..100% no doubt), then
    so should have Walker at Wembley. As I recall he wasnt even cautioned.
    So if Holland were 'cheats', then so were England....I dont recal
    seeing many press articles mentioning the Des Walker incident other
    than was it in/was it out the box etc..if in the event of 'multiple
    incidents' you punish the most severe, so Walkers was a penalty.
    
    The 'offside' goal was a farce, he was about 4 yds onside when the ball
    was struck, and the linesman was ball watching..it is he who should
    also be off the FIFA list.
    
    The thing about football is that when a decision is made it affects the
    remaining part of the game, such that should theoffside have been
    allowed, the Koeman incident would not have occured.
    
    In short, there were 2 bad decisions during the game, but the majority
    of conversation seems to be concentrating on 1 incident...Koeman.  The
    suggestion that Platt dived is ludicrous, it was a definite foul,
    failure to see or recognise that suggests severe eyesight problems.. so
    you could be a ref !! :-)
    
    Personaaly I thought Parker ahd a good game cos Roy is a very tricky
    customer, and parker contained him very well.
    
    Its a pity that the game was so full of incident cos its deflects from
    soem real issues regarding improving UK players skills, the importance
    of international football vs club football etc.  The fact that Taylor
    and others can hide behind the 'bad decision' and 'cheats' aspect of it
    means that there may not be a drive to improving how the Uk approaches
    football.
    
    Well I hope this is seen as a non-racist note, doesnt offend anyone and
    apologies for bringing a few things up again, but I did wade through
    all the notes, and stored up a few responses.
    
    Cheers
    
    Paul
    
    ps  As I recall there were/are some friction between Germany and
    Holland, so the suggestion that a German ref may be anti-english is a
    bit straw clutching, no ??
129.982ECCGY4::HAIGHHow do I feel about my shoes?Tue Oct 26 1993 13:0924
     Re .last, absolutely.
    
    	Added to that, Sky did one of their 'ask the fans' spots the other
    day about the 'whether English football was in crisis?' I'd say that
    around 75% of the answers contained the word 'Koeman'. That is simply
    pathetic. Also Richard Keyes was talking to Monkou from Soton who had
    been sent off a couple of games ago. His comment, 'the wrong Dutchman
    was sent off'! 
    
    	Sorry Dom, but at times the English do seem to be exceptional
    whingers. And I for one am already sick of hearing about it. Holland
    had a goal disallowed but everyone seems to have conveniantly
    forgotten!
    
    	One thing from that last note;
    
    >soem real issues regarding improving UK players skills, the importance
    >of international football vs club football etc.  
    
    	so just which is more important? I must honestly say, that to me
    club football is more important than international football. What does
    the panel think?
    
    			Steve
129.983Robbed in both games...PEKING::COSSEYNTue Oct 26 1993 14:478
    
    All those going on about the Des Walker incident, have also conviently
    forgot that the inital foul was outside the penalty area. So we was
    robbed in that game too....
    
    Anyway were not out of it yet...
    
    Neil...
129.984Echo EchoBREW11::RANKINETue Oct 26 1993 16:2018
    re last ..
    read my entry .981....In the event of multiple or continuing fouls, as
    in the Des Walker incident, the referee will give the more severe
    punishment.  So he ahs a choice of giving a foul at the first incident,
    ie out the box, or if the foul/pulling continued into the box, then he
    gives a foul in the box..ie penalty.  Im not entirely quoting the Laws
    of the Game word for word, but if you want I can. Is this plain enough
    for you ??
    
    Re Club v International football,which is the most important.  If we
    want a successful international team, and the press and comments in
    here seem to suggest that is the case, then this should be the
    priority.  If we dont give a stuff about success at international
    level, then obviously club football is the most important.  The clubs,
    the FA and the fans are the ones who can make their minds up, but
    ultimately is up to the FA to do something about it. 
                                                   
    Paul
129.985Lost in the translation....SIOG::A_KELLYTue Oct 26 1993 17:298
    re .982
    
    >around 75% of the answers contained the word 'Koeman'
    
    Maybe they were referring to themselves. Some kind Dutchman had
    probably informed them that Koeman means Cowboy in Dutch.
    
    Cheers....Ned
129.986PAVONE::TURNERTue Oct 26 1993 18:1266
re: .982
     
   >Sorry Dom, but at times the English do seem to be exceptional
   >whingers. And I for one am already sick of hearing about it. Holland
   >had a goal disallowed but everyone seems to have conveniantly
   >forgotten!

I didn't see the game so I can't really comment (although I have seen the
highlights about 59 times!). The only thing I'll go down as saying is that I
don't think Holland '93 are a patch on Holland '74 (quite frankly, I thought
they looked nothing short of disastrous at Wembley - Poland and Turkey played
better football for long periods). So I'm amazed that the general consensus is 
"the better team are going through to US94"! Then again, I'm sure that Cameroon
(and maybe Belgium) were saying the same thing about England during the last
World Cup. 

One good thing about living abroad is that it doesn't bring me into contact
with Jimmy Hill, the tabloids et al. In fact, I can be grateful for the fact
that I did a paper round every morning between the ages of 12 and 16. Apart
from making me late for school on numerous occasions, it cured any desire I may
have had to read the tabloids and I haven't given them the time of day since!
Then again, I refuse to believe that they reach the levels of the Gazzetta
dello Sport in Italy for biased reporting/whingeing. Sample headline after
Gentile had hacked Maradona's shins for 90 minutes in the 1982 World Cup:

          "GENTILE - CHE GRINTA!" (= "Gentile - what grit/determination!")

Which brings me to the second part of your note:

    >So just which is more important? I must honestly say, that to me
    >club football is more important than international football. What does
    >the panel think?
    
Living on the content, I *certainly* attach less importance to UK club
football. Remember, I'm now at the mercy of partizan Italians who'll be taking
the p*ss morning, noon and night for the next 18 months about England not
qualifying for the World Cup! Given that I've no opportunity to *see* the game, 
I couldn't give a twopenny toss about the outcome of Southampton vs. Newcastle,
let alone Reading vs. Orient (sorry - that's the way it is!). But it makes my
blood boil if I hear a Man. Utd fan murmur that their main objective for the
1993/94 season is the Premier League (rather than the European Cup!). And
believe me, I supported Scotland (and just about everyone else) vs. England a
few years back, because I hated the way England played (I far preferred
watching Willie Johnston and Don Masson to Dave Watson and Brian Talbot!).

So to answer your question, no, I don't put club football before national
football. But I realise that as far as England (Britain) is concerned, mine is
the minority view. The only time I've ever seen England play was against
Belgium in the World Cup. I was surrounded by Belgium fans speaking
incomprehensible Flemish, but even I could appreciate their perplexity at some
of the chants from the England "faithful" ("Mansfield boys, we are here!"). It
reminded me of the popular cry at Wembley a few years back: "We all agree, Rixy
is better than Hoddle!"

And this issue has got to be worthy of its own topic!

Dom

P.S I can also remember that we used to save time picking sides for the
breaktime kickabout at school, by dividing the class into Leeds and Chelsea
supporters (this was c.1970, long sideburns, flared trousers and the rest!). It
was a pretty straight split 50-50 (and believe it or not, I went to school in
Brighton!), but *no one* gave a monkey's about England's fortunes in Mexico in
after that F.A. Cup Final between Chelsea and Leeds!!

Dom
129.987Look at it this wayCHEFS::HARRISRGoosenargh!Tue Oct 26 1993 18:4319
    Lets face facts here.
         
    
    1/ Holland should have been one goal up. Fine no quibbles about that.
    
    2/ Koeman should, no arguing have been sent off.
    
    3/ England probably should have had a penalty so one all. If not then
       the wall for the free kick should have come under the same scrutiny
       as the Dutch free kick.
    
    4/ At either 1-0 or 1-1 I would have fancied Englands chances against
       ten men. Koeman would not have been there to score the free kick,
       and we probably would have won.
    
    5/ Splatt should have been booked for the dive, even though it was a
       foul.
    
    Rich.  
129.988It's not just bad refereeingGALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Tue Oct 26 1993 20:5324
    
    2 weeks on and we're still debating the game.
    
    Any of the incidents mentioned could have changed the course of the
    entire game.  Had Rijkaard's goal been allowed it would have been a
    different match.  Had Koeman been sent off it would have been a
    different match.  On the 90 minutes I thought Holland deserved to win
    but both sides played very well.
    
    England will finish with 13 points from 10 games.  It wasn't just the
    Dutch game that cost them qualification.  Failure to win at home to
    Holland and Norway made qualification much more difficult.  England
    could have won both games and were perhaps unlucky.  Then they were
    lucky to draw in Poland.  Holland were unlucky to only draw at home to
    Norway.
    
    Over the past 13 months Norway have been by far the best side in the
    group.  Holland and England struggled.  Holland came good just in time
    and appear to have won a reprieve.
    
    Holland should qualify now.  I actually think they'll do well - much
    better than Norway.
    
    Gary.
129.989Blaming someone is easier than fixing itBREW11::RANKINEWed Oct 27 1993 14:3037
    Totally agree Gary.
    
    One point I was trying to make that, assuming England dont qualify (and its
     not all over yet), when people came to analise the reasons for the failure
    they will perhaps start to look for scapegoats eg Taylor, the ref fir
    the Holland game etc.  Having found the scapegoats, blamed them, and
    actioned on them eg sack Taylor, write ti FIFA about the ref etc. they
    will then do nothing.  OK they will appoint a new manager...Keegan,
    Atkinson, whoever... but things wont really change.  
    
    Personnally I feel that some radical changes are needed to be made in
    order to ensure that the British countries can compete internationally
    in future.  eg reduction of games in a season, more time together as a
    squad, skills improvement program at school level, coaching which
    involves playing with a football more than at present.
    
    We (Britain) can do it - our clubs have been successful in the past and
    have played some excellent football while doing it.  I recall a friend
    of mine spending a week with Liverpool, who was amazed by the amount of
    time that they trained using the ball... this is not hte case with a
    lot of clubs at present.  What England are particularly good at is
    the 'organising' of a team, as is Big Jack with his 'Irish' team
    (recent results excepted), where the team performs, even though the
    quality of the individuals may not be the best.  Scotland used to have
    some quality individual p[layers, but poor organisation as a team, and
    so they never did well.  Andy roxburgh (recent results excepted)
    managed to get a bunch of average players playing well as a unit eg
    Euro championship.  To me acombination of the organisational strength
    of the English, mixed with a drive to increase individual skill and
    technique, would in the long run eg 10 years, give England an
    international team that can compete at the highest level.
    
    To carry on at present will only result in the continuing downward
    slide towards averageness...hey who knows they may end up as bad as
    Scotland !!
    
    Paul
129.990ECCGY4::HAIGHHow do I feel about my shoes?Wed Oct 27 1993 15:0421
    
    Re .986 and Doms reply.
    
    	Maybe you are not aware but I also live abroad. I live in Munich
    (mostly) and have for eight years. The only way I get to see English
    club football is on ths Sky Satellite which some pubs here have. This
    is only a recent occurence as up until 2 years ago Sky had no league
    football. 
    
    	Even then I was far more interested in the league than the English
    national team, this means that I don't really mind if England lose
    as long as City win, I know supporters of other clubs who fell the same
    way, I also know people who totally disagree. The league goes on for 8 
    months and England 'play' occasionally. 
    
    	Don't get me wrong, I would rather England won, but if they don't
    I'm fairly phlegmatic about it. (Maybe because in the last 20 years
    I've got used to it.) Strangely enough Germans don't tend to extract
    the Michael like your Italian colleagues do. 
    
    			Steve
129.991How about this idea......BERN02::GOODEJWed Oct 27 1993 16:3149
    
    Re .989
    
    	I quite agree that some radical changes are required. I never 
    believed that Talyor was the right man for the job so I hope they sack
    him anyway. Regardless of who replaces him, there needs to be some
    basic changes acroos the board in English football.
    
    	There are clearly too many games being played at the top levels.
    I have been thinking of a possible solution which is this:
    
    1)	Remove 3 (possibly 4) teams from the premier league. This will
    	immediately free up 6 (or 8) fixtures for each club. 
    
    2)	Scrap all league games for a month in winter - I would recommend
    	January since the weather is anyway at its most inclement.
    
    3)	Now allow the England manager to have a squad of 30 players or so
    	for the whole month to train.
    
    4)  Re-introduce the old "home" international series to be played on
    	the last three weekends of the break. This allows the manager to
    	try out his squad.
    
    
    Advantages:
    
    This system would give the England manager the opportunity to
    really build a team which have played together.
    
    The top players will play less league games.  
    
    The club groundsmen will have a month to nurse their pitches back to
    health.
     
    
    Disadvantages:
    
    Clubs will lose gate reciepts because of fewer games. These could be
    offset somewhat with TV royalties from the home international games??
    
    
    	Here in Switzerland the league breaks oof for 3 or 4 months in
    winter. Of course the weather plays a bigger part here. Still, I think
    the English game could benefit from a winter break. Its a question of
    reducing the size of the league again!
    
    	JBG
                          
129.992Now you did....FORTY2::FOWLERMCome the glorious dayWed Oct 27 1993 16:553
>>>>I never believed that Talyor was the right man for the job 

8-)
129.993Taylor who???????????????BERN02::GOODEJWed Oct 27 1993 19:428
    
    Re .-1
    
    	No really I didn't. To be quite honest, when my mate told me that
    Graham Taylor had been given the job, my first thought was "what are
    the FA doing appointing a snooker player as England manager???"
    
    JBG
129.994UTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funThu Oct 28 1993 10:036
last night result

Turkey 2 Poland 1


T_
129.995Hejja Norge!BCFI::BSVENSSONTue Nov 02 1993 18:038
    Hi friends!
    I have a short question that maybe our norwegian friends
    could kindly answer??
    In what town will the Turkey-Norway game take place ??
    The date is 10th. nov. and as I`m gonna be in Turkey
    that week I was thinking , maybe I`ll watch the game ??
    
    regards , Bengo.
129.996Turkish delight?OSLACT::HENRIKWMaking the most of miseryWed Nov 03 1993 12:139
129.997The state of English soccerSIOG::A_KELLYThu Nov 04 1993 13:0153
    
    
    
    I'm not sure if this is the right conference for the following, but it
    makes interesting reading, with more than a grain of truth to it. It is
    from the Reuter News Service:-
    
    
====================================Attachment==================================
By Mike Collett
LONDON, Nov 3 (Reuter) - England, barring a sensation, are out of the World Cup
English champions Manchester United are out of the European Cup.
The country which gave the world soccer has rarely suffered so badly.
Despite the much-heralded introduction of the premier league for the country's
top 22 teams last year and despite some superbly gifted individuals, the
failure of first the national side and then the national champions suggests
major problems in the international arena.
Add the behaviour of the hooligans who cause mayhem at away matches in Europe
and the picture becomes even more depressing.
It is now 27 years since England won the World Cup for the first and only time.
The national side have never won the European championship and in both the 1988
finals in Germany and 1992 finals in Sweden they were despatched without
winning a game.
English club sides have won 23 European trophies -- more than any other nation 
- but it will be 10 years next May since an English side were last crowned
European Cup winners.
For five of those years English clubs were suspended from European competition
following the Heysel Stadium disaster at the 1985 European Cup final.
Since the ban was lifted in 1990 English sides have had one success in Europe -
Manchester United winning the Cup Winners' Cup in 1991.
That lone victory shows just how far English clubs have fallen.
In the 10 years before the ban English clubs won 10 European titles, including
the European Cup seven times, six of those in succession between 1977 and 1982.
The way the game is hyped by the media in Britain has often illustrated English
short-sightedness at its worst and echoes the days earlier this century when
England refused to belong to FIFA, world soccer's governing body, and enter the
World Cup.
One of the changes incorporated into the new premier league -- dubbed the 
Greed Is Good League" by a respected English soccer writer -- has been the
introduction of American football-style squad numbers -- a cynical ploy to
exploit fans into buying specific replica shirts.
So while England's competitors concentrate on teaching their youngsters ball
skills and developing the game along modern lines, England's top clubs prefer
to play 42 league matches at 150kph and take their supporters for every spare
penny.
England's national team and English clubs may no longer be challenging for the
highest honours, but at least England have something no European country can
boast.
With their American-style numbers they have the best Nos. 25, 32 and 34 in the
business. The problem is that most of the time, Europe is playing a very
different ball game.  
(c) Reuters Limited
REUTER NEWS SERVICE
129.998Niall 'Air' Quinn ...naaahhh....GYMAC::DCASSIDYThu Nov 04 1993 14:396
    
    Interesting note...this individual numbering on the back though was
    a brilliant marketing exercise based surely on a certain No 23 from
    an American sport!!!!
    
    Dezzz... 
129.999or a certain number 99 from a Canadian sportSIOG::A_KELLYThu Nov 04 1993 16:071
    
129.1000Does Ryan Giggs wear Red 5?BERN02::GOODEJThu Nov 04 1993 16:451
    
129.1001Here a card to match your shirt, Eric..BREW11::RANKINEFri Nov 05 1993 04:0411
    I hope im not opening up a wound thta may have already been discussed
    elsewhere...apologies in a dvance if I am..But re the staement in the
    reuters report 'the country that gave the world the game'  is there any
    concrete evidence of this...I thoght China claimed to hold this honour.
    
    I guess it depends on how you definfe it.  I thinks England had the
    first organised league in the world, althogh Queens park seem to
    challenge Notts County as the oldest club.  Does it all matter, and do
    we really care ??
    
    Paul
129.1002Taylor's LamentSIOG::A_KELLYTue Nov 09 1993 13:2013
    
    Well just eight more days of Taylor Management left and I for one can
    hardly wait. The announcement yesterday of the squad has me scratching
    my head again as Taylor errs on the side of caution *again* by
    including Ripley in his squad. How many no-cappers does that bring the
    total to now? With players like Waddle and Beardsley *still* waiting
    for their recall Taylor picks Ripley. If I were a lawyer I'd 'rest my
    case'. If he has to go for 'no-cappers' then why doesn't pick the
    Premiership's leading scorer (2 more 'crackers' last night').
    
    I gaze in wonderment at the man....thank God it's over!!!
    
    Ned 
129.1003Makes me sweatKERNEL::WITHALLGWait Till They Getta Loada MeTue Nov 09 1993 13:2919
    
    I can see it now.
    
    Poland 1 Holland 0
    
    San Marino 0  England 0
    
    
    Taylors team.
    
    
                          Woods/Seaman/Flowers
    Dixon     Pallister  Walker  Wright  Ruddock  Adams  Keown  Dorigo
    
              
    
    
    Gazzer.  
                           
129.1004SUBURB::COOKSTaking the biscuitTue Nov 09 1993 16:054
    Just imagine the absolute outrage if a miracle happens and Poland do
    win....and England do their usual patting the ball all over the shop
    and win 2 nil or something.
    
129.1005Cole, Beardsley, Fowler,Shearer,Ferdiand,WrightPIECES::63585::SWIFFENWed Nov 10 1993 16:288
What I can't understand is why didn't Mr T pick all the in form
strikers and play them, we don't need more than 2 defenders, we 
need goals.  If as everyone expects we lose at least we can go
out on a relatively reasonable (not high!) note.

The man's a fool!!!

Chris.
129.1006Good idea..butOPG::TONYWed Nov 10 1993 16:3913
>>What I can't understand is why didn't Mr T pick all the in form
>>strikers and play them, we don't need more than 2 defenders, we 
>>need goals.  If as everyone expects we lose at least we can go
>>out on a relatively reasonable (not high!) note.

>>The man's a fool!!!

>>Chris.


Good idea, but wouldn't they get in each others way...!! 

Tony
129.1007Great IdeaSIOG::A_KELLYWed Nov 10 1993 17:0423
    
    
    
    
    Ok, that gives me an idea, so here's my team for next week:-
    
    
    				A. Anybody
    
    
    		B. Anybody	C. Anybody	D. Anybody
    
    
    		Beardsley	  Platt 	  Waddle
    
    
    Wright		Cole		Ferdinand	Shearer	 
    
    Subs: Fowler, Sharpe, Anybody-Wotsenglish-Whocan-Shoot
    
    what d'ya think????
    
    Ned
129.1008You've goota be kidding Ned...BERN02::GOODEJWed Nov 10 1993 17:175
    
    	Come on Ned, A.Anybody's been having a crap season. You've gotta
    call up P.Anybody. 8+)
    
    JBG
129.1009I Resign !!!SIOG::A_KELLYWed Nov 10 1993 17:2710
    
    re - .1008
    
    Now I know what Grim Failure feels like. I pick an attacking team and I
    get criticised for my choice of defenders. ;^) I'll just have to put on
    my funeral jacket, leave out Andy Cole, Chris Waddle and Peter Beardsley
    and pick someone new (Oh I know, I'll pick Ripley, he was devastating
    against third division Shrewsbury yesterday!).
    
    Ned
129.1010Ewood Park, Englands new Home !WOTVAX::GREENJAAndy GreenWed Nov 10 1993 17:4514
    
    Ned,
    
    How much for C. Anybody ? 
    
    I'm looking for an English centre half with international potential,
    
    regards,
    
    Kenny D.
    
    p.s. Does Stuart Ripleys previous employer have anything to do with your
    opinion ? 
                      
129.1011No opinion on RipleySIOG::A_KELLYWed Nov 10 1993 18:2023
129.1012Dont forget A.Somebody..!BCFI::PIHLSTROMThe bowsprit looks forwardWed Nov 10 1993 19:206
    
    
    I heard that A.Somebody are in good shape again,
      and would play against San Marino          :-)
    
    
129.1013Who could forget A. Somebody ?WOTVAX::GREENJAAndy GreenWed Nov 10 1993 19:423
    
    If the A stands for 'Attack' then you must be referring to the centre
    half Liverpool bought recently. ;-) 
129.1014Turkey 2 v Norway 1SIOG::A_KELLYThu Nov 11 1993 11:524
    
    Looks like too many beers for Norway as they must have gone into
    yesterday's game with Turkey with a hangover. Or are we seeing the
    emergence of Turkish football as a world force?  8^)
129.1015BERN01::BOLGERJerry Bolger.Thu Nov 11 1993 13:1313
    Re: -5, -4, -3, etc.
    Sorry Guys, but if you really thought about it, you'ld realise that
    you can't have a load of Anybody's playing for a team that has a Nobody
    as a manager !
    
    
    Re: -1   According to CNN last night, the Turkish ecconomy is spiralling 
    into  depression. Apparently, it has something to do with all the shops 
    closing  down so that the shopkeepers can concentrate on their football 
    training !!! ;-)
    
    
    Jerry.
129.1016ESSB::PHAYDENThu Nov 11 1993 18:155
    
    I thought it was because they had to spend all their G.N.P to bribe
    ref's.
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt).
129.1017England 6-0, Poland win 1-0...GVA05::BURKHALTERMon Nov 15 1993 09:4910
    Ripley is there apparantly because he plays with Shearer at Blackburn
    and will supply the crosses for Shearer to knock in against the
    San Marino Bus Driver.
    
    I must say when I first saw the name of Ripley in the line up I was
    kind of hoping it was the old England No.8 Andy Ripley, probably
    more likely to score anyway....
    
    -Dom
    
129.1018See the pig flying over the blue moon daddy ?ESSB::PHAYDENMon Nov 15 1993 14:018
    
        -< England 6-0, Poland win 1-0, no more famine, world peace, DEC
    gives everybody back their jobs and a $100,000 bonus, cure for baldness... >-
    
    One can live in hope I suppose !
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt)
    
129.1019A Spit of a ProphecySIOG::A_KELLYMon Nov 15 1993 14:0812
    
    Anyone see Graham Taylor on 'Spitting Image' last night?
    
    He reckoned that all England needed to qualify was a war in
    Scandinavia.
    
    Another less likely option was that Poland beat Holland and England win
    7-0.
    
    See there is hope.
    
    Ned
129.1020FORTY2::ASHMail Interchange Group, ReadingMon Nov 15 1993 15:338
My favourite Taylor quote was

	No-one ever considers Poland beating Holland 7-0 - then we only have 
to win 1-0 against San Marino.

I think he was joking . . .

g
129.1021CLARID::STUARTMon Nov 15 1993 16:475
What about ... no-one ever considers that England may not beat San Marino...

I think I am joking.

Gordon.
129.1022UNTADE::PCASYorkieMon Nov 15 1993 17:285
    
    I think it would be a fitting end to Graham Taylors illustrious 
    career, for England to get beaten 3-1 in Bologna.
    
    Al.
129.1023Mirror's money is pretty safe I reckonNEWOA::FIDO_TConation is the keyMon Nov 15 1993 17:587
129.1024CHEFS::HARRISRGoosenargh!Mon Nov 15 1993 18:3814
    Has anyone out there thought of a really frightening scenario ? From
    Wednesday there will probably be a man with the surname of Taylor out
    in the wilderness looking for a job. There will also be a club out
    there who will lose a manager to the England set up. Therefore there
    will be a job going. Follow my drift, so .............. If say Hoddle
    gets the job, there is a strong possibility Taylor will move in at
    Stamford Bridge, or there could follow a shuffle of managers. ie Gerry
    Francis gets the job, whatshisface at Reading gets the job at QPR and
    taylor gets the Reading job, longballs them into nowheresville, and lives 
    happily ever after.
    
    Frightening aint it ?
    
    Rich.
129.1025CUCKOO::YEOMANSDMon Nov 15 1993 19:073
    Taylor would be welcome back at Vicarage Road.
    
    Dave.
129.1026ESSB::PHAYDENMon Nov 15 1993 19:2910
    
    re:.1023 
    
    Well in that case lets hope that England beat San-Marino 100 - 0 and
    Holland beat Poland. Nice payout !
    
    Two little pieces of annoying annoying shit will have got their just
    reward !
    
    Peter(You know who).
129.1027To sleep perchance to dreamDBSUK2::GRICEPhil Grice DBS Sustaining EngineeringTue Nov 16 1993 00:445
    I must admit I like the way the BBC are hyping the game on Wednesday -
    pictures of goals going in to the music of the Great Escape,the
    Magnificent Seven and the Impossible Dream :^)
    
    /phil
129.1028...Andy, Andy Cole...SIOG::A_KELLYTue Nov 16 1993 12:208
    
    According to teletext Shearer is now out of the reckoning, so it looks
    like Wright and Ferdinand to play "shooty-in" >8-). I wonder who's
    gonna come on as sub though when Wright and Ferdi miss a hatfull. I
    know I'm biased but Mr Taylor, if you're reading this, give Andy Cole a
    game!!!
    
    Ever hopeful.....Ned
129.1029SUBURB::ABSOLOMTOn 7830-2924Tue Nov 16 1993 12:547
    
    Is the Poland v Holland game being played the same time as the England
    game???
    
    Tony
    
    
129.1030YES!!!!UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Tue Nov 16 1993 12:591
    
129.1031I'll be there I'll be there I'lllll be thereUTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funTue Nov 16 1993 14:447
I'll be leaving Holland tonight at around 12 to attend tommorows game 
Poland - Holland in Poznan. There have been rumours here that the Polish mob
will kick *ss but I don't believe it. When we qualify the whole of Poznan will
be orange.


T_
129.1032SUBURB::COOKSTaking the biscuitTue Nov 16 1993 15:045
    Lets prey that the Mirror will have to fulfil their promise of handing
    110,000 pounds out to the Polish squad.
    
    er,though I doubt it somehow.
    
129.1033Pray for a miracle....GVA05::BURKHALTERTue Nov 16 1993 15:319
    It's bound to be nightmare time again with the Poles involved.
    
    Poland will go 1 up within 10 minutes, England hearing this start
    knocking the goals in and get the 7 needed, only for Holland to
    get the equalizer in the 89th minute....
    
    ...its bound to happen :-(
    
    -Dom
129.1034Even more horrifying......UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Tue Nov 16 1993 17:586
    re-1 Dom
    
    No even worse......it stays 1-0 in Poznan but St Marino scores 7-1 in
    the 91th minute........;-)
    
    John, getting slowly orange......
129.1035SUBURB::COOKSTaking the biscuitTue Nov 16 1993 20:173
    Even worse...Poland beat Holland 7-0 and England lose 1-0 due to a
    freak own goal by Les Ferdinand (who gets confused).
    
129.1036Snowballs chance in hellKERNEL::WITHALLGWait Till They Getta Loada MeTue Nov 16 1993 21:406
    
    
    More chance of a War in Scandinavia as reported earlier.
    
    
    Gazzer
129.1037 HAVE FAITH !!!MACNAS::SMORANWed Nov 17 1993 10:417
    Have faith, did not poland lead Holland 2 nil away only to draw. Who
    says that they cannot win by 3 nil at home. That leaves England to 
    score five. Well good luck tonight and may the best two teams go
    forward.
    
    p.s. Poland owe ye one.
     
129.1038Fool to the last...PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Nov 17 1993 11:1730
    
    Well the fool couldnt resist one last chance to tinker, here is the
    team for the game Bologna tonight.
    
    Seaman
    Dixon...????
    Walker
    Pallister
    Pearce
    Ince
    Platt
    Ripley
    Sinton...???
    Ferdinand
    Wright
    
    Thankyou Paul Parker, thankyou Lee Sharpe, but you wont be required
    anymore. In comes Ripley for his one cap to put in his sideboard, and
    Back comes Lee Dixon, he's the one who cant pass, but he can punt the
    ball in the general direction of Les Ferdinand's head, and finally Lee
    Sharpe, having his best season yet for the manx, and having played in
    about the last 5 or so games for England, he's outed for Andy Sinton.
    
    Imagine if the miracle does happen, we have to put up with this
    clueless idiot for the next four years.....it's almost enough to make
    you want us to go out tonight. 
    
    Goodbye Taylor, You've been the worst manager we've ever had.
    
    Dave...
129.1039GT pick Andy Cole - wow!SIOG::A_KELLYWed Nov 17 1993 11:2520
           <<< TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]FOOTBALL.NOTE;1 >>>
                                 -< FOOTBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 129.1028             World Cup qualifying Group 2              1028 of 1037
SIOG::A_KELLY                                         8 lines  16-NOV-1993 09:20
                           -< ...Andy, Andy Cole... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    >According to teletext Shearer is now out of the reckoning, so it looks
    >like Wright and Ferdinand to play "shooty-in" >8-). I wonder who's
    >gonna come on as sub though when Wright and Ferdi miss a hatfull. I
    >know I'm biased but Mr Taylor, if you're reading this, give Andy Cole a
    >game!!!
    
    >Ever hopeful.....Ned
    
     	Thanks Mr Taylor, so you do read the notes files. I'll never
    criticise you again (well not till tomorrow anyway).
    
    Cheers.....Ned
129.1040Re: .1038CUCKOO::YEOMANSDWed Nov 17 1993 11:285
    He speaks very well of you.
    
    Actually, I heard Sinton was in because Sharp was injured.
    
    Dave.
129.1041Re:.1038ESSB::PHAYDENWed Nov 17 1993 13:044
    
    I heard dixon was in because Parker is crap !
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt).
129.1042PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Nov 17 1993 13:2511
    
    >> I heard dixon was in because Parker is crap !
    
       Which ever way you look at it he's better than Dixon.
    
    Another point...what happened to Merson..??? remeber him, he was the
    one who was given the job to get goals against Holland instead of
    Wright, now Wright is back and Merson is nowhere....just another
    example of Mr Taylor's tactical genius over the last 3.5 years.
    
    Dave...
129.1043CUCKOO::YEOMANSDWed Nov 17 1993 13:413
    I believe Merson is also injured. Probably Taylor's fault as well.
    
    Dave.
129.1044SUBURB::ABSOLOMTOn 7830-2924Wed Nov 17 1993 13:459
    
    Taylor is a bad joke. How can he possibly think that Dixon is a better
    option than Rob Jones??? He can't defend, he can't attack. In fact,
    knowing Taylors ideas on the game, he's probably been brought in for
    his long throw.
    
    Tony
    
    
129.1045Another price money....UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Wed Nov 17 1993 13:4916
    The madness still going on ; some company here in Holland ( Marketing
    probably...) has in reaction on the price money of the Mirror promised
    the players of St Marino about 40.000 pounds if they beat England....
    And now the hard part ; they have assured this money at Ladbroke in
    London. So if St Marino wins in the end they will be paid by the
    english themselves.........
    What a sick way of trying to influence football...........
    
    Oh yes, the last 2-2 from Holland-Poland was indeed coming back from a
    0-2 score. But in the end it should have been 20-2 for Holland ; it was
    unbelievable to see how van Basten and the others missed the most
    beautifull chances..........And in the end it was almost 2-3 when
    Smolarek, who plays in Holland almost scored.......
    
    John
    
129.1046EBYGUM::WATTERSONPWed Nov 17 1993 13:508
    
    re .1044
    
    Rob Jones is injured aswell ..... typical Taylor !!!!
    
    Gary Ablett for England !
    
    Paul
129.1047PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Nov 17 1993 13:5111
    
    Re-2
    
    Where did you here about all these injuries....if they are why are they
    in the squad ?. 
    
    According to todays press, they are "tactical" changes.
    
    Your not related to Mr Taylor are you...?
    
    Dave...
129.1048Now for something completely differentSIOG::A_KELLYWed Nov 17 1993 13:597
    
    It seems that the Dutch Advertising Agency HVR has offered fl 100,000
    to San Marino to beat England tonight. Sounds like real good old
    patriotism until you hear the rest of the story. They have also, it is
    reported, got a bet on with Ladbrokes that San Marino win. 
    That's what I call good business....England lose and the English pay 
    the incentive.
129.1049NEWOA::FIDO_TConation is the keyWed Nov 17 1993 14:065
>                  -< Now for something completely different >-
    
    Looks remarkably similar to .1045 to me !
    
    Terry
129.1050Tinker Taylor does it againPEKING::COSSEYNWed Nov 17 1993 14:0923
    
    Well Taylor's last game tonight...Let's face it, England will score
    the 7 goals there is no doubt about that but Poland won't get a result
    against Holland....Even in his last game Taylor has still f****d it up.
    Taylor took over from Bobby Robson who took us to the Semi Final off the
    1990 World Cup and made us the 4th best team in the world..And now we
    can't even qualify, we have the players but the manager f****d up with
    his pathetic tatics and team selection.. He had the chance to build on
    Robson's success and take us one step closer... After tonight Taylor
    will be GONE BUT NEVER FORGOTTON. I'll tell you this the World Cup without
    England is like...Queen without Freddie Mercury, Rolling Stones without
    Mick Jagger, Bono without his wellies, Jocky Wilson without his kilt,
    A Pub without Beer...Thanks Taylor not only have you ruined it for
    the English public but you have spoilt it for the other countrys to
    who love having the likes of Germany and England to play against.
     
    All this will have been forgotton when England win the European
    Championships in 1996 under the new management team. I don't care what
    anyone says we have the players it's the tinkering of Taylor thats got 
    us into this mess....
    
    
    Neil....
129.1051NEWOA::FIDO_TConation is the keyWed Nov 17 1993 14:395
    >Let's face it, England will score
    >the 7 goals there is no doubt about that 
    
    Really ! you mean like we did the last time we played them ?
    
129.1052PEKING::COSSEYNWed Nov 17 1993 14:497
    
    > Really ! you mean like we did the last time we played them ?
    
     NO! we only scored 6......And that was at a canter....we've got to
     score one more this time and we will....
    
    Neil...
129.1053Stop dropping those tabs man.ESSB::PHAYDENWed Nov 17 1993 15:0629
    
    re .1050
    
    This note is excused on the grounds that you must be very upset.
    
    England will score 7 goals ??????????????????
    The 4th best team in the world ??????????????
    Taylor will never be forgotten ??????????????
    Win in 1996 ?????????????????????????????????
    
    Bobby Robson as I recall led that great and glorious team to Germany
    for the European Championships and yet that has been forgotten in light
    of a LUCKY win against both Cameroon and Belgium and all of this in
    what is generally acknowledged to have been a pretty woeful World Cup.
    
    It ain't Taylors fault it's the fault of the system. Gary Lineker made
    a very valid point last Saturday on football focus, when he said that
    the only chance that English football has now is for the directors of
    the clubs ( M.U.F.C etc...) knocked out of European competition to feel
    the decline of the England team in their pockets i.e the standards set
    by the England team are reflected in the club scene (at every level)
    and the best club in the country was comprehensively beaten by a third
    rate European side costing them 7,000,000.
    
    Enough for now,
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt).
    
    
129.1054PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Nov 17 1993 15:297
    
    Impartial Celt.
    
    Can you explain to me why England were "lucky" to beat Cameroon and
    Belgium.
    
    Dave...
129.1055PEKING::COSSEYNWed Nov 17 1993 15:4923
    
    .1053...
    
    The group games in the 1990 finals were poor except England-Holland.
     
    But the knockout stages was one of the best I can remember, with
    England being involved in three of the best games of the tournement.
    Even the 3rd and 4th play-off game was very entertaining. I'm
    afraid the final was a big let down and thats the game people tend 
    to remember and base there judgement on....
    It's your anti-English views thats getting in the way of the truth....
    
    A two year rebuilding period will do the England set-up a world of good
    ready for the Euro Championships...
    
    The only people who think the 1966 and 1990 World Cup Finals were
    woe-ful are the anti-English brigade.....
    
    Neil....  
                                       
    
    
    
129.1056SUBURB::WAITEGMAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450Wed Nov 17 1993 16:0022
    Ireland are the luckiest team in the world-
    
    1990 World cup
    --------------
    
    1/  V Holland 10 minutes left and they are going out of the world cup
    until a mistake by the Dutch keeper levels the score.
    
    2/  Holland and Ireland draw on points and their names go into a hat to 
    see who will play Germany.  Holland drawn against Germany whilst Ireland are
    faced with Romania.
    
    3/  Ireland outclassed by Romania but win on penalties.  
    
    4/  Italy beat em' 1-0.  Should have been 3-0.
    
    Ireland didn't win a single game in the World Cup unless you count
    penalties.
    
    Hugs,
    
    Gary  (THE IMPARTIAL SOAPBOXER)
129.1057CLADA::DODONNELLNothing personal.It's just business.Wed Nov 17 1993 16:117
    
    Re Gary
    
    Yeah but apart from all that, what makes you think Ireland were lucky?
    ;')
    
    Denis.
129.1058SUBURB::WAITEGMAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450Wed Nov 17 1993 16:138
    Good one, Denny:-))
    
    
    
    
    Hugs to Denny,
    
    GAry
129.1059ESSB::PHAYDENWed Nov 17 1993 16:1425
    re: .1055
    
    Would'ya go away !
    
    If that's the case then most soccer pundits must be Anti-English.
    
    I agree with you that some of the knockout games were entertaining,
    but it wasn't  the class of football which made them so but the 
    stalemates which resulted i.e extra time & penalties. The goal Platt
    scored against Belgium was a fluke. Belgium controled most of that game
    and should have scored on numerous occasions. The Cameroon aside from
    being a bit naive at the back were by far the best team in the
    tournament (Germany excepted). You were blessed to beat them !
    
    If you think that two years are going to turn English football around then
    think again. It's that type of arrorgance which has landed the team in
    the mess they're in today. As a matter of fact it is not that English
    football needs to be turned around ,but rather that it needs to be
    pointed in a direction comensurate with the expectations of a nation.
    You want to be one of the best teams in the world. You've
    never been close to it with the exception of the 1966 - 1970 teams.
    That's over 20 years ago. Tell me, how do you turn around 20 years of
    decline in 2 years ?
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt).
129.1060Where were u when Koeman scoredYELBUS::DSMITHGazza's my hero...NOT!!!!!Wed Nov 17 1993 16:1516
    
    
    
     re .1055
    
     "The only people who think the 1966 and 1990 World Cup Finals were
    woe-ful are the anti-English brigade."
    
     Well, there you go then, 99% of the worlds population can't all be
    wrong!!
    
    Anyway, best of luck to all the teams attempting to reach the WC
    finals tonight, especially the boys from Holland.
    
     Danny.
    
129.1061re:1056 You're dead right Gary :-)ESSB::PHAYDENWed Nov 17 1993 16:171
    
129.1062SUBURB::WAITEGMAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450Wed Nov 17 1993 16:1811
    Re 1060
    
    This Danny bloke makes me laugh.  I've read many of his notes and I
    reckon he is a little bit jealous of the English.
    
    You should be proud to be a Scot, Danny.  They're a great footballing
    nation.  They only lost to Costa Rica 1-0.  
    
    Hugs to Danny,
    
    GAry (The Impartial Soapboxer)
129.1063SUBURB::WAITEGMAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450Wed Nov 17 1993 16:198
    Re 1061
    
    Thanks Mr Hayden (The Impartial Celt).
    
    
    Hugs,
    
    GAry:-)))
129.1064PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Nov 17 1993 16:206
    
    Impartial Celt.
    
    Now can you explain to me why David Platt's goal was a fluke...?
    
    Dave...
129.1065ESSB::PHAYDENWed Nov 17 1993 16:2918
    
    O.K,
    
    Gazza chips over the wall, Plattie had his back to the goal, swung a leg at
    the ball, not a clue where it was going(ask the man) and voila, flukie 
    goal for Engerland in the back of the net.
    
    Then again if you're English this translates to....
    
    Gazza chiped the perfect ball (best player in the world was Gazza) onto
    the tip-toe of plattie who even with his back to the goal used his
    (British engineered radar) soccer skills to pick his spotm and burried
    the ball past the outstretch arms of the best keeper in the world (at
    the time) into the only place where he(the keeper) couldn't reach it.
    
    Bye,
     
    Peter(An Impartial Celt).
129.1066take some of thatAYOV16::KMCCLELLANDThe Honest TruthWed Nov 17 1993 16:3111
    Re 1062
    
    This <GAry> bloke makes me laugh.  I've read many of his notes and I
    reckon he is a little bit jealous of <anyone who is likely to qualify>.
    
    You should be proud to be an <Englishman>,GAry. They're a great footballing
    nation.  They only lost to <USA 2-0>.  
    
    Hugs to <GAry>,
    
    Kev...
129.1067EBYGUM::WATTERSONPWed Nov 17 1993 16:328
    
    Mr Impartial,
    
    you obviously know even less about football than I thought - if you
    bothered watching Platt much you'd see he scores goals similar to that
    on a regular basis.
    
    Paul
129.1068PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCWed Nov 17 1993 16:3615
    
    Impartial Celt.
    
    How can I ask him, I dont know him, although I met him at Prague
    Airport last year when England played Czechoslovakia, maybe I should
    have mentioned his fluky goal then.
    
    The thing is, did he or did he not try and hit the ball with his foot and
    put the ball into the net..?
    
    The only reason you think this goal was a fluke was it was scored by an
    Englishman. Most viewers thought it was one of the best goals in the
    tournement.
    
    Dave...
129.1069:re.1067 For who ? More clubs than hot dinners !ESSB::PHAYDENWed Nov 17 1993 16:371
    
129.1070SUBURB::WAITEGMAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450Wed Nov 17 1993 16:397
    Hey Kev,
    
    My note was copyrighted:-))
    
        
    
    Gary
129.1071Try Changing EL for UN...PEKING::COSSEYNWed Nov 17 1993 17:0213
    
    .1059
    
    What are YOU on ?!!
    
    Anyone who thought Platt's goal was flukey obviously knows nothing
    about football.....Quality strike....
    
    The only thing wrong with the English football is the bods that run it..
    
    If we don't qualify this time, one things for sure we will next time...
    
    Neil...                                                    
129.1072Silly boy..YELBUS::DSMITHGazza's my hero...NOT!!!!!Wed Nov 17 1993 17:0213
    
    
     re 1062
    
     Hey Gary, my mother had the good sense to make sure she didn't
    drop me in England many years ago so why would I be jealous.
    
     Danny.
    
    ps Don't slag me about Scotland, I only reside here, born many many
      miles away. Support your local team and all that.
    
    pps Where were when Koeman scored???
129.1073SUBURB::WAITEGMAKE MY DAY, RING ME 7830 2450Wed Nov 17 1993 17:0910
    Re 1072
    
    Mr Danny,
    
    I was at home watching Ronald Koeman's super freekick.
    
    
    Hugs,
    
    Gary (THe IMPARTIAl SOAPBOXEr) 
129.1074KIRKTN::AMCARTHURandrew 789 8225Wed Nov 17 1993 17:164
    good luck to all tonight....hopefully San Marino can score one 8^)
    against the best in the world..not.
    
    should be fun tonight...
129.1075ESSB::PHAYDENWed Nov 17 1993 17:167
    
    re: 1071
    
    Isn't that sweet. I fyou changed the CO to PU we could almot be
    related.
    
    Peter(An Impartial C**t). fill in as appropriate.
129.1076Get a Grip on YourselvesSIOG::A_KELLYWed Nov 17 1993 17:1726
    
    Just did a little analysis of the last 20 entries in both note 129
    (England's Group) and note 130 (Ireland's group).
    
    Note 130
    ========
    
    	Of the 20 entries 2 were from supporters of teams outside the scope
    of the note. Both were entries wishing Ireland luck. The rest are
    mutual backslapping and well wishing, probably as it should be.
    
    Note 129
    ========
    
    	Of the 20 entries 10 were from supporters of teams ouside the scope
    of the note. Most were derrogatory descriptions of how jammy England
    were in the last World Cup. The rest are from English people trying to
    defend England's last World Cup performance.
    
    
    So it seems note 129 is heading back to it's old format of 'let's slag
    off England'. It's funny how it *always* gets back to this.
    
    Dread to think what it will be like tomorrow.
    
    Ned (the partial Yank/Canadian/Irish/German/Geordie)
129.1077Where the HELL is Peter Beardsley you stupid man!FILTON::KEARNS_Ruh oh KWYJIBO on the loose!!!!Wed Nov 17 1993 17:2113
    
    Tomorrows Papers.....
    
    		"Dutch woe as Koeman scores injury time own goal"
    
    		"Platt makes it 7 but admits he was lucky"
    
    
    				Rob   \|||/
    				     { o o }
     				      \	= /
    				        "
     
129.1078Yes Ned, but some of your country men don't help you...BERN02::GOODEJWed Nov 17 1993 18:3020
    
    Re .1076
    
    Hi Ned,
    
    	have a quick look in 131 (Wales' group). You'll find a few prime
    examples of the sort of encouragement we get from a few English.....
    one of them even offers to help US (ie the Welsh at the Arms Park)
    sing the Rumainian National Anthem. There'll definitely be some singing
    there......
    	So Ned, I know they're only two individuals, but how can you
    complain about anti-English sentiment. I haven't seen any provokation
    from us Welshies (have you Mr Wicks??).
    
    	I do agree about you general point. Ie. as soon as there's any big
    game on, out come the rude boys with there "can't wait to see your face
    when your team get stuffed" comments. Such is life. Ours is not to
    reason why, ours is to ignore them.
    
    JBG
129.1079YAWN!!! HERE WE GO AGAINPEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURWed Nov 17 1993 18:3311
    Why dont you Micks get off our note and stick to your own. Every time 
    England play we have to put up with all this crap, and just because
    youv'e all got such big chips on your shoulders we have to be bored
    silly by your boring ramblings every time there's an International
    involving England. I suppose tommorow we'll have to put up with all
    you Irish giving us your expert opinions on Englands performance as
    usual. I'd really love it if by some miracle we qualify tonight, you
    lot would be sick...
    
    Andy..B
     
129.1080ENGLAND!! ENGLAND!! ENGLAND!! ENGLAND!!PEKING::COSSEYNWed Nov 17 1993 18:3412
    
    Good luck England You'll get your 7 goals NO problem.....
    
    Poland do us a favour get a win........
    
    Then the whole world will be greatful for helping the greatest side
    in the world to qualify....If we do qualify tonight I have no DOUBT WE
    GO ON AND WIN THE 1996 WORLD CUP.....
    
    
    Neil Pussey....
    
129.1081PLUNDR::MORANBetter Dead than Smeg!Wed Nov 17 1993 18:5518
    
    Stolen from the Internet, latest odds on qualification and new England 
    manager, if anyone cares:
    
    England are 10-1 to qualify for WC '94
    Wales are 11-8 to qualify
    Rep of Ireland are 4-6 to qualify
    
    The leading candidates for Taylor's job are:
    
    HOWARD WILKINSON       3-1
    GERRY FRANCIS          5-1
    STEVE COPPELL          6-1
    GLENN HODDLE           8-1
    GEORGE GRAHAM          8-1
    RON ATKINSON           8-1
    
    Tim
129.1082Nowt queerer than folk...SIOG::A_KELLYWed Nov 17 1993 19:1514
    
    re - .1078
    
    You're right, but I didn't see the note 131 stuff 'til after I'd
    written .1036 (guess that's the problem with this not being realtime
    (what the term? unrealtime?).
    
    I just can't for the life of me understand why *anyone* who was born in
    the British Isles (geographically speaking) would want a home side *not*
    to qualify. How could anyone justify this desire with a rational
    argument. In my opinion it would be *great* if Wales, Ireland and (yes)
    England *all* qualify tonight.   
    
    Good luck to all......Ned
129.1083Ta BoyoAYOV25::SSMALLWOODSteve Smallwood @ DBO, Good GriefWed Nov 17 1993 19:196
    Re-1
    
    Thanks Alan
    
    
    Steve.
129.1084PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURWed Nov 17 1993 19:216
    
    I'm English.... not Jock, not Taff, and not Irish, thats why i
    hope all the others dont get the results they wont..
    
    
    COME ON ENGLAND..
129.1085As I said - "no rational reason"SIOG::A_KELLYWed Nov 17 1993 19:286
    
    re .1084
    
    You've told me you're English, but you still haven't given me the
    reason why you want Ireland and Wales to get beat? Are either of them
    playing England tonight?
129.1086PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURWed Nov 17 1993 19:502
    
    Why should i want any other club to win.. 
129.1087BERN02::GOODEJWed Nov 17 1993 19:5119
    
    Re .1082
    
    Yeah, thanks Alan.
    
    	I'm first and foremost Welsh. Then British. I have no relations in
    Ireland but we go way way back as Celts, so they count as one of the
    "home nations" for me. I would love to see England qualify tonight. Not
    because they deserve it or they're the best team. Just because they're
    England.
    	We Welsh (and Irish?) don't believe we have any right to get to the
    USA. We hope get get some luck. We want to see our teams to do well.
    And if we don't, well, lets face it, we're not great footballing
    nations. We'll try again next time. In Nurenburg when the Germans
    absolutely stuffed us 5:1 we didn't come away crying in our beers. We
    came away singing.
    
    JBG
    
129.1088Altogether now.."WE all want England to win,dadadaMASALA::CDOUDIEDo it again..hahahaha !!Wed Nov 17 1993 20:1011
    RE .1080
    
    You probably will win the '1996 WORLD CUP', because you will be the
    only ones contesting it........
    
    and I hope you win tonight and I hope Holland win...see, we're not all
    biased.......
    
    Non racist replies only please.....
    
    colin.
129.1089PEKING::BAREFIELDABLUE IS THE COLOURWed Nov 17 1993 20:211
    you make me feel sick....
129.1090England 5 - 0 ?ESSB::PHAYDENWed Nov 17 1993 20:2226
    
    Of course we want England to win. Who cares ????? San Marino Huhhh !
    
    Holland to win .
    
    Ireland to win.
    
    Wales to win.
    
    France to win.
    
    Italy to win.
    
    Switzerland to win.
    
    Spain to win.
    
    Now to the Pub to cheer on good ol' England.
    
    I hope England do rebuild their team in time for 1996 European
    Championships and win the bloody thing ! But I doubt it !
    
    Howard Wilkinson favourite to get *the* job. Does nae bode well.
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt)
                                                                    
129.1091YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingWed Nov 17 1993 22:086
    
    	Score after 10 (yes TEN) seconds
    
    	San Marino 1  England 0
    
    	!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
129.1092YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingWed Nov 17 1993 22:144
    
    	Poland 1 - holland 1
    
    Tony B.
129.1093YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingWed Nov 17 1993 22:242
    
    San Marino 1  England 1  (Paul Ince) 22mins
129.1094YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingWed Nov 17 1993 22:364
    
    	San Marino 1  England  @  (ian Wright) 32 mins
    
    Tony B
129.1095YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingWed Nov 17 1993 22:404
    
    	San Marino  1  England  3  (Ferdinand)  37 mins
    
    Tony B.
129.1096YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingWed Nov 17 1993 22:537
    
    Half Times
    
    	SAn Marino  1  England 3
    	Poland      1  Holland 1
    
    
129.1097YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingWed Nov 17 1993 23:084
    
    	SAn Marino  1  England  4 (Ian Wright) 46 mins
    
    TonyB.
129.1098YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingWed Nov 17 1993 23:164
    
    	Poland  1  Holland  2
    
    Tony B.
129.1099YUPPY::BUSHAlive and KickingWed Nov 17 1993 23:494
    
    	Poland  1  HOlland  3
    
     tony B.
129.1100England Out !!BUSSTP::DREESWed Nov 17 1993 23:5611
    
    They think it's all over..... 
    
    It is now !!!
    
    Final Scores
    
    San Marino 1  England 7
    Poland     1  Holland 3
    
    Del.
129.1101It was the Poles fault !!.KERNEL::WITHALLGWait Till They Getta Loada MeThu Nov 18 1993 00:126
    
    Tha Tha Tha Thats All Folks......
    
    
    
     
129.1102The 10 second ruleGVA05::BURKHALTERThu Nov 18 1993 09:027
    OK....so I'm a masochist, what happened in the first 10 seconds!!!!
    
    -Dom
    
    P.s. By the way spare a thought for the French who had qualifyed up
    to the last 10 seconds, when the Bulgarians scored the winner and
    knocked the French out..
129.1103There's always 1998 <smile>SIOG::A_KELLYThu Nov 18 1993 10:5344
    
    re .1102
    
    Well San Marino kicked off, went straight up the field, the final pass
    went astray, and Stuart Pearce tried to pass back to Seaman but only
    succeeded in teeing it up for the San Marino no. 10. Brilliant start,
    the crowd (well congregation) went wild!!!!
    
    As for the rest of the game England were CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP (hope
    I got enough craps in there). The game plan was to get to the bye-lines
    and pump in great long crosses, which, for 30 odd minutes, the giant
    San Marino defenders had absolutely no problems with. Even though
    England went in 3-1 up at half time they didn't deserve it as two goals
    were direct goalkeeping goolies and the other was from Paul Ince, who,
    fed up with the England forwards' total inadequacy, bundled his own
    lads aside (in a 'get the f*** out the way and let me show you how to
    do it' gesture) went straight for goal and buried the ball.
    	Thank God we didn't have to endure much of the second half as BBC
    made a tactical switch to the Wales game which gave us a chance to
    readjust to some decent football.
    
    	Low points:-
    		Ripley was crap.
    		Dixon was Double crap.
    		Pearce was Triple crap.
    		Did Platt play?
    		Wright and Ferdinand couldn't control the ball worth a s***.
    		The tactic was Quadruple crap.
    	High points:-
    		Taylor is Gonzo!!
    
    	I guess I should offer some advice on how I would have done better.
    Well this is it:-
    	
    		I would have picked the entire Newcastle United team
    (I know I'm biased but they're *all* English) and we would have had a 
    side which plays good, flowing attacking football, with two strikers 
    who are deadly in front of goal. The score would have been 25-0 to
    England but alas it would have only been academic as the Poles caved in
    again.
    
    Keep smiling.......Ned
     
                                                                       
129.1104PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Nov 18 1993 11:1528
    
    Well the enivitable happened, we are finally out, and we havent
    deserved to qualify. 
    
    Graham Taylor was left a promising side when he took over from Bobby
    Robson, and in the 3 years since he has basically dragged us further
    and further down. This man has played the same side twice in 37
    internationals. Some will say he hasnt been helped by injuries, ok to a
    certain extent, but he has played players out of position, gone to
    major championships without recognised players in certain positions,
    taken off the leading scorer when we were 1-0 down in major
    international games and changed the team and tactics constantly from one 
    game to the next. 
    
    If the FA keep this man on in any form to help with the international
    team then they obviously don not give a f*ck about the England team.
    
    We want a manager thats played at the top level, and has the respect of
    the players, how can a man who's major claim to footballing fame was
    playing for Lincoln, tell the likes of Platt and Gascoigne (if he ever
    gets fit) how to play the game. 
    
    That means no Ron Atkinson, (although I think he would do a good job),
    and definatley no Howard Wilkinson. He's just a clone of Graham Taylor.
    
    Dave...
    
    
129.1105CUCKOO::YEOMANSDThu Nov 18 1993 11:296
    Re: .1104
    
    I agree Taylor has to go, but Robson was guilty of all the things
    you're accusing Taylor of. Robson just had better players and luck.
    
    Dave.
129.1106Goodbye Graham, we had some laughs in the end...BERN02::GOODEJThu Nov 18 1993 11:3420
    
    Re. 1103
    
    Ned,
    
    	I have to agree with you (but you forgot to mention the Scintilating
    Sinton)....Newcastle would have absolutely creamed them. Not that it
    would have made any differnece in the end.
    
    	Anyway, that 9 second goal was worth it just to see the look on Mr
    Taylor's face!
    
    JBG
    
    Ps. as an aside, does anyone ever remeber Taylor making any tactical
    substitutions. I mean, after 20 minutes of long crosses being pick off,
    it was pretty clear that Ripley was a bad tactical decision. Ince's
    goal showed they needed to take players on so why didn't he bring on
    Andy Cole and young Clough and get rid of two wingers that weren't
    all that successful?
129.1107What about an exchange ?EVOAI2::COCONNIERThu Nov 18 1993 11:386
129.1108PEKING::WILSOND1DAVE WILSON @WLCThu Nov 18 1993 11:4612
    
    Re . 1105
    
    Dave...
    
    Dont get me wrong, Bobby Robson was far from perfect, but I dont
    remeber him constantly changing the team around, and playing players
    out of position. 
    
    Also he didnt change the tactics everytime we played. 
    
    Dave...
129.1109Lee....., a man for all seasonsYUPPY::PANESFrench kisses and chinese burnsThu Nov 18 1993 12:0410
  I should imagine most people who support England are feeling somewhat
  down in the dumps today. But if you look hard enough you can find good
  things in almost anything. I for one, was heartened by the way Lee Dixon
  kept pinging in crosses with pinpoint accuracy time and time again.
  Surely '96 and the European Championships will be a fitting stage for
  this man to demonstrate his talents to his detractors.


  A Lunatic
129.1110We make US orange !UTROP1::HANSSEN_Jare you serious ?Thu Nov 18 1993 12:1722
    Poland - Holland   1-3
    
    It wasn't the easy game it looked like. Poland has done its sportive
    duty and played like hell, supported by the referee Sundrell. The field
    was hard and that caused that the dutch couln't play their favourable
    game ; playing fast around, technical beauties and speed.
    In the 10th minute Bergkamp scored a beauty...like in London he hit a
    ball from Wouters, without letting it hit the ground, in the far end of
    the goal !
    Only three minutes later England-fans' dream came out ; Koeman kicked
    the ball against Lesniak who, through this action, came free for goal
    and equalized 1-1 ! After that both teams stayed attacking with the
    dutch looking stronger. In the second half the same, only in the 10th
    minute (again) Roy went through on the wing and let Bergkamp make 1-2.
    The polish got stronger but couldn't create good oppurtunities. On the
    other side the dutch had several chances untill de Boer scored 1-3.
    After that he hit the barn.....Not a great game, best players Wouters,
    de Boer and Bergkamp.
    We made it on our own strength, we didn't need a bad score of the
    english ! WE DID IT !!!!!!! (Sorry for my shouting......)
    
    John
129.1111EBYGUM::WATTERSONPDon't mention the world cupThu Nov 18 1993 12:284
    Wasn't Brookside exciting last night ?
    
    Paul
129.1112CUCKOO::YEOMANSDThu Nov 18 1993 12:3917
    Re: .1108
    
    I seem to remember Roson changing to a sweeper system half way through
    the last World Cup finals. Also, I'm convinced one of the main reasons
    Barnes never did well for England was because Robson used to play him
    at left back.
    
    As for changing the team around, even if you forget England's recent
    injury problems, Robson had the advantage of a core of consistantly
    good players such as Shilton, Robson, Butcher and Lineker.
    
    Anyway, I'm too depressed to argue the point further. I can't see any
    manager doing well with our current crop of players. When our top club
    side can't beat the Turks, there obviously isn't a great deal of talent
    about.
    
    Dave.
129.1113PLUNDR::MORANBetter Dead than Smeg!Thu Nov 18 1993 12:409
    
    re .1111
    
    Paul, I missed it, any chance of a brief synopsis?
    
    Tim
    
    PS. Well done Ireland, commiserations to Wales (I'm gutted for you)
    and FOAD Taylor, and that shambles of a team of yours.
129.1114BERN02::GOODEJThu Nov 18 1993 13:0014
    
    Hey come on guys,
    
    	there are some quality players around who have been playing
    consistently well. Taylor just didn't pick many of them. He did stick
    with a few eg. Platt & Ince. Some may say Ince is not world class, but
    for me he's the sort of guy you gotta have in there, always battling.
    Pity Beardsley (who Shilt's reckons is too old!!!), Waddle, Cole....
    weren't given any opportunity to do their bit.
    	Don't go talking down the whole of English football just because of
    what's happened. Yes, the system has to be drastically changed, but the
    players are there, ready and waiting for their next chance.
    
    JBG
129.1115Congrats HollandSIOG::A_KELLYThu Nov 18 1993 13:088
    re .1110
    
    John,
    	Congratulations to Holland. You're absolutely right, you got to the
    WC94 finals because of what you're team did, and didn't rely on others.
    Best of luck next summer.
    
    Cheers......Ned
129.1116FORTY2::ROBERTSONThu Nov 18 1993 13:1338
129.1117FORTY2::FOWLERMFight the powerThu Nov 18 1993 13:2027
I think there's a lot more parity these days among the half decent footballing
nations. Traditional powerhouses like Italy, Germany, Brazil certainly aren't
the dominant forces they used to be, and as for England...8-(

I don't think arguments about Taylor not being able to pick the best 11 players
really hold water because any 11 players from domestic club football should 
play better football than we have been doing. All the players he picked
yesterday perform much better for their club sides, and I think the reason for
that has to be the management and teamwork.

I just don't think it's true that other nations are hugely superior to us,
because I think if we had 11 players who played together regularly and as a
team, then we'd have a good shot at any nation in the world. That's not English
bias, because I think the same is true of practically any nation, for example,
Wales beating Belgium, Bulgaria beating France, (somewhere in Africa) beating
Germany.

I think therefore the blame has to be deposited at the feet of the FA, who
prevent there being a decent number of international matches by making us play
too many domestic matches, and the England manager, who really didn't make
anything of the opportunities he had to get us playing as a team. Constantly
picking different teams in order to adjust to the next opponent's style of play
is not the answer, and no-one but Taylor has ever thought it was.

Sign me up for the Tim Moran school of thought, FOAD Graham Taylor.

Mike
129.1118BERN02::GOODEJThu Nov 18 1993 13:3924
    
    Re .1117
    
    Tim,
    
    	Can't agree more about the lack of matches together. I alway though
    it a bad move to scrap the "home" internationals, not just for us poor
    relations, but England too. So I wholeheartedly agree with your point.
    
    	However, you yourself point out that Taylor's been trying to pick
    the players and tactics for one match at a time. Instead of developing
    a consistent style, we've been trying to firefight each team as they
    came at us. Our players were playing sometimes out of position, with
    little experience of playing together, with new tactics each game. Had
    Taylor tried to develop a squad of players who consistantly perform
    well things might have been different. He's had his chance and blown
    it. Hopefully we'll see a "different" England in '96.
    
    	Surely now is a good time to bring the home internationals back
    (sorry to keep harping on...). With England, Wales, N Ireland and
    Scotland all out, they'll have some time on their hands next year
    for a British tournament again!! (Why not invite France too??)
    
    JBG
129.1119FORTY2::FOWLERMFight the powerThu Nov 18 1993 14:026
We could have a football five nations championship, because France are out too.
Or perhaps a rival World Cup...

The possiblities are endless.

Mike
129.1120HA HA HA HA HA HA...:-) :-)YELBUS::DSMITHThey've only played 10 seconds..Thu Nov 18 1993 14:0516
    
    
    
     Attention world, anyone know the whereabouts of Cosseyn, Barefield
    and Waite? I'm already missing having a laugh at their inane ramblings,
    come back guys, it's only a game!!!
    
     Never mind, you'll have reason to celebrate in '96. Your team don't
    need to qualify so at least you'll be there (for a week or 2 anyway).
    
     Danny.
    
    ps Who was the clown commentating on the BBC last night. After San
    Marino hit the post in the 2nd half, he came out with the classic,
    "they've almost done the impossible again". Oh, I forgot, nobody
    is meant to score against Engerlands finest eleven.
129.1121But would England play at Twickers ??GYMAC::DCASSIDYThu Nov 18 1993 14:057
    
    NOT such a bad idea....a Five Nations Championship....
    
    Starting at the end of the season and finishing before the June 17th...
    
    Dezzz.
    
129.1122Desperate for a team to supportPEKING::WARBURTONGIs it herbal deficiency Doc??!Thu Nov 18 1993 14:162
      
      Does anyone know how Australia got on last night ?
129.1123Those Oh-So-Humble ScotsPAVONE::TURNERThu Nov 18 1993 14:1820
    re: .1120
    >Attention world, anyone know the whereabouts of Cosseyn, Barefield
    >and Waite? I'm already missing having a laugh at their inane ramblings,
    >come back guys, it's only a game!!!
    
    Talking of inane ramblings, you seem to be going through a rare period
    of form yourself at the moment. What about a nice constructive note in
    128 telling us how you think Scotland are going to go about qualifying
    for WC98 (or even EC96)? That's football, by the way, not tossing the
    caber.
    
    Good job you didn't qualify, actually. Craig Brown seems to be a fairly
    pleasant character, but his name just doesn't scan with that classic
    Scottish World Cup ditty "We're All Off With X's Army (And We'll Really
    Shake Them Up When We Win The World Cup!)". At least Andy Roxburgh had
    that going for him.
    
    Dom 
    
    
129.1124re .1122 AussiesPLUNDR::MORANBetter Dead than Smeg!Thu Nov 18 1993 14:184
    
    Beaten 1-0 (2-1 agg), as it says somewhere else in this conference.
    
    Tim     
129.1125PEKING::WARBURTONGIs it herbal deficiency Doc??!Thu Nov 18 1993 14:246
      
      WaiteG is suffering from a mystery illness so I'm afraid we will have
    to do without his post match analysis.
    
    Warburtong
    
129.1126Stick to your Morris dancingYELBUS::DSMITHThey've only played 10 seconds..Thu Nov 18 1993 14:3014
    
    
    re .1123
    
    Okay then, Scotland will qualify comfortably for the '96 Euro and the
    '98 World Cup. How does that grab you?
    
    By the way, the wonderful little ditty you're referring to has nothing
    to do with Andy Roxburgh. It was penned in 1978 when Ally McLeod led
    Scotland to glorious failure in the world cup finals in Argentina. Mind
    you, as that was another feeble failure at qualifying by Engerlands
    finest, you can be excused for not remembering.
    
     Danny.
129.1127Stop this nonsense nowWOTVAX::GREENJAAndy GreenThu Nov 18 1993 14:3917
    
    I really can't believe anybody wants to revive the home internationals. 
    
    Surely the message from not qualifying for the World Cup is 
    that there is something inadequate in your system. 
    
    Virtually all the British teams players play regularly in the Premier
    League, playing against each other again is going to achieve nothing
    other than to convince one bunch of loosers that they are slightly
    better than all the other loosers.
    
    Do we really want to change or would we rather bury our heads in the
    sand and tell ourselves that we really are great because we have
    mastered the long ball game, fought our bollocks off, and won the
    international equivalent of the Transit Van Windscreen Wiper Trophy.  
    
    Last nights performances were bad enough, please don't make it worse.
129.1128FORTY2::ROBERTSONThu Nov 18 1993 15:0423
I personally believe that resurrecting the Home internationals would be an
excellent idea. There is no pressure as far as qualification for WC/EC is
concerned, but on the other hand, the games won't be pointless as national pride
is at stake, so motivation will not be a problem.

The main benefit would be to allow the managers of the countries, to get the
players they want for a couple of weeks, without the pressures of the domestic
season, and build a unit that is used to being together 90% of the time.

England currently play 2 games after the season has finished in the highly
prestigous Rous Cup, which really fires up the imaginations of the population.
The Home internationals would produce far more interest. And with the emergence
of Wales, and NI since championships were canned, the likes of 1500 people at
Wrexham's ground would no longer occur.

On monday evening on R5 they were saying that it should be brought back with The
Republic of Ireland included, this would allow 2 home games per team per
tournament. I think the tournament should also be spread out over 2 weeks
instead of 1, and maybe only played once every 2 years!!

Bring it back!

Al
129.1129Yeah....GVA05::BURKHALTERThu Nov 18 1993 15:107
    ....and at the end of each yearly championship the best players
    are picked for the British team that then play the internationals,
    then we could have players like Giggs, Gascoine playing in the same team....
                                                            
    ...and we might win something!
    
    -Dom
129.1130'96 will be your year !ESSB::PHAYDENThu Nov 18 1993 15:1511
    
    I won't say a word 
    .
    
    Peter(An Impartail Celt)
    
    P.S
    
    In the words of great men,
    
    TAYLOR FOAD.
129.1131They are Pros arn't they...?GVA05::BURKHALTERThu Nov 18 1993 15:3512
    Actually I dont think Taylor can be blamed for either of the San Marino
    games. 
    
    He should have been able to pick any 11 players from the English
    Premier division and they should have hammered a bunch of amatures.
    
    Certainly not let in a goal within 10 seconds, in a game where they
    were exepected to be smashing the early goals in......
    
    The rest of the games, he should be shot for ...:-)
    
    -Dom
129.1132World Cup Losers' Tournament?FORTY2::ASHMail Interchange Group, ReadingThu Nov 18 1993 15:498
I think the Home Internationals should stay buried. Beating the likes of 
Scotland and Wales isn't going to make us 'world-league' material. But 
presumably the FA now has a bit of travel budget spare, so why not a short 
tournament before the World Cup, so all the teams can get to play under their 
new managers? Invite France, Denmark, and Portugal (e.g.) - all 4 teams can 
use it to start to prepare for Euro-96.

grahame
129.1133PEKING::WARBURTONGIs it herbal deficiency Doc??!Thu Nov 18 1993 15:513
     
     Does all this make Taylor the worst England manager for three decades
    or does that honour belong to Don Revie ?
129.1134Not the experience we need.PAVONE::TURNERThu Nov 18 1993 16:1848
    Sorry, another vote against the Home Internationals! England, France
    and Denmark (to name but three) will probably receive umpteen
    invitations for friendly matches between now and next June, from
    countries who have qualified and want to put their teams to the test
    before WC94. They'll want to see how their players fare at Wembley or
    at Parc-des-Princes in front of a packed (debatable!) crowd. 

    England should use these friendlies as a step to rebuilding/learning
    rather than just a means of recouping the millions lost by not
    qualifying for the US. This goes for the other countries as well;
    Scotland or Wales would gain more valid experience from a friendly
    against Colombia or Cameroun than they would from playing England. 

    We know that our players can cope with opponents who run for
    90 minutes, jump for every ball, tackle back in their opponents' half
    of the field, etc. What they need to improve at is the sort of one-touch
    midfield play that Portugal displayed for an hour against Italy last
    night.

    Re: .1126
    >By the way, the wonderful little ditty you're referring to has nothing
    >to do with Andy Roxburgh. It was penned in 1978 when Ally McLeod led
    >Scotland to glorious failure in the world cup finals in Argentina. 

    Oh dear, it's not just the fundamentals of spelling/punctuation that
    you haven't come to terms with; the old reading skills are a bit rusty
    too, aren't they? The "X" inserted in the song title should be
    substituted by the appropriate name (be it "Ally" or "Andy"). I fully
    remember Ally McLeod - I sincerely felt for the guy at the time. God
    knows, *he* wasn't the one boasting that Scotland were going to conquer
    the world.

    >Okay then, Scotland will qualify comfortably for the '96 Euro and the
    >'98 World Cup. How does that grab you?
    
    That's more like it! I've even written a new verse for you (they don't call
    me McCartney for nothing!):

    "And we'll really shake them up
     When we QUALIFY for the European Championships
     Cause Scotland are the greatest football team".

    What 'yer mean, it's got to rhyme?

    Dom                                                            


    
129.1135I believe they can erase bad memories using hypnosis BERN01::BOLGERJerry Bolger.Thu Nov 18 1993 16:4113
    Re: Mr. Waite's Mystery Illness.
    
    
    Well, I can only say that I'm very glad to hear that Gary has finally
    sought treatment for his problem. It's widely accepted that actually
    admitting that you have a psychological problem is the first step
    towards finding a cure.
    
    Wishing you a speedy recovery on behalf of all the Irish friends you've
    made through this confernce,
    
    Jerry.
          
129.1136We're off to the USA!!ESSB::MCUNNIFFEEven Better than the Real ThingThu Nov 18 1993 21:0414
             Hard luck on your lads for not making it to the finals. Looks
like our lads will have to keep the flag flying for the countries this side
of the world. Its off to the USA for Bonner, Irwin, Phelan, Whelan, Moran,
Staunton, Keane, Aldridge, etc. I'm sure both of you will be supporting our
lads.

Look on the bright side of things. You will not have a problem qualifying
for the 1996 Euro finals.


   CUNNO
     

129.1137GALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Thu Nov 18 1993 21:077
    
    >Its off to the USA for Bonner, Irwin, Phelan, Whelan, Moran,
    						   ^^^^^^
    
    I very much doubt it.  Anyway this should be in topic 130.
    
    Gary.
129.1138GALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Thu Nov 18 1993 21:0911
    
    Plenty has already been said about the games.  I didn't see either and
    only heard the first half of San Marino v England on the radio.
    
    Best comment of the night was from the BBC commentator.  Just after the
    San Marino goal he said
    
    "I keep expecting Jeremy Beadle to appear and then we'll start
    properly"
    
    Gary.
129.1139It's a "Brit" problem....PAKORA::CDOUDIEThu Nov 18 1993 21:3445
>>I think the Home Internationals should stay buried. Beating the likes of 
>>Scotland and Wales isn't going to make us 'world-league' material. But 

  Arrogance or what, just a touch mind you........remember when we contested
  the first Rous cup and who had the total cheek to beat the team who put
  it up for grabs, we're all in the same boat just now...OUT of the World
  Cup. 

>>presumably the FA now has a bit of travel budget spare, so why not a short 
>>tournament before the World Cup, so all the teams can get to play under their 
>>new managers? Invite France, Denmark, and Portugal (e.g.) - all 4 teams can 
>>use it to start to prepare for Euro-96.

  Do these teams want to play in a tournament  with the way the minority of 
  english 'hooligans' (notice did not say fans) behave.

  and another small point, most of the skillful players that are on the 
  tips of everyone's tongue who play in the english premier are 'foreign',
  i.e. Cantona,Giggs,Hughes,McAllister,Strachan,Rush and the successful
  teams of the previous years had a smattering of 'foreign' players in
  their teams and of course the King of them all......
                          ...Kenny...
 
  Goalies, Schmiecal(sp), Southall, Grobbelar.
  A few exceptions, Waddle, if you wanted pinpoint crosses why wasn't he
  playing, Barnes, in his prime, Hoddle, probably the best passer of the
  ball the game has ever seen and just didn't fit in to the international
  set up, the same with Waddle. 
  Your two 'best' of the current crop, play in the Italian league and 
  even they can't turn it on every game.

  So that's part of the problem, you just haven't got enough class players
  to be a good team at the moment.

  This is one of the reasons the Italians blame for not reaching the Euro
  Finals last time, not enough young talent getting their chance. They've
  done something about it, limiting foreigners is one and their team must
  be one of the favourites now to win now.

  Did I say SMALL point ???

  a sensible note from me...I don't believe it !!!!! 8*/

  colin.

129.1140Times are a changin'KERNEL::WITHALLGWait Till They Getta Loada MeThu Nov 18 1993 23:3216
    
    "a goal worthy of superior opposition"
    "they've almost done the impossible again"
    
    
    Did we have a laugh at those ones. The superior opposition are all
    going to the world cup. We won't be scoring past them for a while to
    come. And as for little San Marino ! - they did Holland proud. They
    played to the best of their ability which is more than what I can say
    for my country folk. I see more passion on a Sunday afternoon in the
    park.
    
    Wake up and smell the coffee England. 1966 is long gone. Earn the 
    respect. 
    
    Gazzer - An Englishman. 
129.1141NoPAKORA::AMILLARAnd some late news just in...Fri Nov 19 1993 03:0911
    
    Re - Home Internationals and other games.
    
    Is anybody really interested in these games, and I include the players
    in this? It's bad enough trying to get the primadonnas(sp) to turn up
    for meaningless World Cup qualifiers without asking them to be fit for
    games that are friendlies. The passion even went out of the Scotland v
    England match a long time ago.
    
    Archie
    
129.1142Scotland v EnglandKIRKTN::JCRONINHMFCFri Nov 19 1993 08:2011
    I beg to differ,I do not believe the passion died for Scotland v
    England games.I reckon if there was a Scotland V England game next
    Saturday at Wembley there would be 100,000 Scots outside the Stadium,
    with or without tickets.What killed this game off was the playing of
    the match on a Wednesday night in London,and also a victory for the
    yobbo's after the last game in Glasgow.The passion was still there then
    because on that Saturday I had to get my Tickets sent from Kent as they
    were so scarce up here.
    
    Ferry Jambo.
    
129.1143the day baxter sat on the ballKIRKTN::JCRONINHMFCFri Nov 19 1993 09:397
    Re .1139 Arrogance or Not...
    
    Remember who was the first team to beat England at Wembley after your 1966
    cup triumph.
                                SCOTLAND.
    
    Ferry Jambo.
129.1144LARVAE::MUNSON_PHuman = Ape + AttitudeFri Nov 19 1993 17:0813
129.1145TRUCKS::SANTso near yet sofa...Fri Nov 19 1993 19:5725
    
    	We took one point from Norway. One point from Holland. We got what
    	we deserved - bugger all.
    
    	Graham Taylor is a numpty but then so are most of the crowd that
    	surround him and speak in his defence. The time to shoot him is not
    	now...let him suffer a while first, then appoint someone with a
    	clear mission once the fog of frustration and anger has cleared.
    
    	The next England COACH needs to be someone who has experience of 
    	playing, and ideally also coaching, the game at the highest level
    	in this country ie. Div1 (old money) or Premier League.
    
    	A few potentials spring to mind, but for heavens sake it doesn't
    	matter all that much. What we must do is appoint someone who is
    	LUCKY! Taylor is not nor never has been lucky.
    
    	Believe it or believe it not, but I'm actually relieved we're out.
    	A good old purge will do wonders for the future. What is vital is
    	that we do actually have a purge, and that it happens throughout
    	the echelons of power in the FA. Using Taylor as a patsy for the
    	woes of the national game's infrastructure is, frankly, unfair.
     
   	Andy.
    
129.1146DCEIDL::HINXMANIn the range of strangeSat Nov 20 1993 00:2512
	re .1142

>    with or without tickets.What killed this game off was the playing of
>    the match on a Wednesday night in London,and also a victory for the
>    yobbo's after the last game in Glasgow.The passion was still there then

	I'd reckon that the destruction of the Wembley turf by Scottish
	supporters and other public order problems resulting from the
	"visit" by Scottish supporters were high on the list of reasons
	the Home Internationals were abandoned.

	Tony
129.1147Holland Holland Holland HollandUTROP1::JANSENReading Blondes have more funMon Nov 22 1993 11:1812
Hi Guys,

just returned from Poland, 18.000 Dutch supporters and almost nothing bad 
happened, great great great, I'm already looking for a trip next summer 
to the US of A.

Gary,

I've got ya a program for your collection.


T_
129.1148PEKING::COSSEYNMon Nov 22 1993 12:056
     
    Anyone who thinks English football is in decline should watch 
    Newcastle game yesterday. 11 English players playing the game
    how it should be played..... Great performance....
    
    Neil...
129.1149I don't think soFORTY2::ROBERTSONMon Nov 22 1993 13:1012
re .1146

>	I'd reckon that the destruction of the Wembley turf by Scottish
>	supporters and other public order problems resulting from the
>	"visit" by Scottish supporters were high on the list of reasons
>	the Home Internationals were abandoned.

Why then did they keep the England - Scotland fixture going 4/5 years after the
home internationals were abandoned???

Al
129.1150Good , bad , ugly ?ESSB::PHAYDENMon Nov 22 1993 13:1113
    
    re: -1
    
    Agree wholeheartedly. A brilliant display of what English football can
    be. A pleasure to watch. Newcastle fans should watch out, Keegan's team is
    playing him into the England job.
    
    Just as a matter of interest, anybody read that F.I.F.A are going to
    insist that Great Britain play as one team for the next World Cup in
    France ? Rumour Rumour Rumour !!!!
    
    Copell(sp. ?) odds on for England. Good or bad ?
    Peter(An Impartial Celt).
129.1151Oh Libero....GYMAC::DCASSIDYMon Nov 22 1993 14:2121
    
    Newcastle played very entertaining football yesterday and
    wholeheartedly deserved to win. But look how the goals came about...
    
    To try an put an analogy on that performance against what England would
    have done is a little premature. NO top international side would have
    conceded those goals because...and it has been said before...in
    England, the sweeper (libero) system hardly exists. NONE of those goals
    would have come about if a decent sweeper had been incorporated. In
    fact before the game started I could see Liverpool getting a thrashing.
    All 4 Liverpool defenders were caught square on numerous occasions.
    
    Look at the goals England conceded in the group matches that cost them
    dearly. Both against Norway in Oslo and the Bergkamp's at Wembley
    probably avoided by incorporating a sweeper.
    
    Bobby Robson maybe was starting to get the right idea at the wrong
    time !!
    
    Dezzz.
     
129.1152FORTY2::ASHMail Interchange Group, ReadingTue Nov 23 1993 16:0224
Just to come back to the England-Scotland games (I couldn't possibly comment 
on the wonderfulness of Newcastle United), as someone mentioned, there's no 
shortage of passion. And that's the point. Successive England managers (and 
possibly Scottish ones too) said that there always was too much passion for a 
game which was meaningless in the greater scheme of things (Europe, World 
Cups).

Whether we beat Scotland or not would certainly get people motivated, but if 
we want to become a World (or even European) power at football, we have to 
play the sort of game which is going to beat the majority of those sides. 
Sadly, playing against British teams is not going to get us that. Even more 
sadly, we haven't got enough class players RIGHT NOW to beat the sides going 
to the USA either.

So England has to use the next 2 years to prepare for that. However, all the 
comments emanating from the FA these days show no sign of them changing. I 
wouldn't be at all surprised if they announce that the tactics advocated by 
Charles Hughes ('statistics prove that most goals come from Route 1 football' 
- not a direct quote!) haven't been given a fair trial! We need a manager 
who'll really try to put them into practice - after all Taylor was in danger 
of playing rather too much football at times (games against Holland and Poland 
at Wembley e.g.). So, I think the time could be right for Dave Bassett!!

grahame
129.1153Ditto!PAVONE::TURNERTue Nov 23 1993 16:1314
    Grahame,
    
    That's pretty much the point I was trying to get across in .1134(?).
    British players don't really have too much to learn from each other.
    I'm sure Brazilian football would go right down the drain if they
    isolated themselves from the rest of the world, prevented their players
    from playing overseas, etc.
    
    People on the Continent would doubtless admire the passion (read
    "ferocity"!), the pomp and the ceremony of an England-Scotland fixture.
    But I seriously doubt that they would be particularly concerned with it
    as a football fixture.
    
    Dom 
129.1154? about last.ESSB::PHAYDENTue Nov 23 1993 16:3614
    
    re: -last
    
    Dom,
    
    I don't know what it means but is it not true that in the time  
    that Brazilian players have been playing overseas , they have failed 
    to win a World Cup ? I'm not sure but I don't think many played 
    in Europe pre 1970.
    
    Correct me if I'm wrong.
    
    Peter(An Impartial Celt)
                            
129.1155PAVONE::TURNERTue Nov 23 1993 16:4314
    Peter,
    
    No, the point I was making was practically the opposite, i.e. Brazilian
    football *would* doubtless go down the drain if their players (e.g.
    Careca, Alemao, Bebeto, etc. in Italy/Spain/Germany) *stopped* playing 
    abroad. Isolation cannot benefit the football of any country.
    
    By the way, I liked your gastronomic football note yesterday (in 130?),
    but you completely forgot to mention a "pot-pourri" of styles and "X
    split the defence like a knife through butter".
    
    Still, promises well for the future of football journalism!
    
    Dom
129.1156Si, I understand Senor !ESSB::PHAYDENTue Nov 23 1993 16:5917
    
    Dom,
    
    Yeah, I understood the context of your note, and the point that I was
    making was that since Brazialians have *started* playing in Europe
    the team has *stopped* winning the World Cup i.e post 1970.
    Isolation seemed to benefit them !!!
    
    Maybe it was because they were an unknown quantity or because they had 
    the best players the world has seen ?
    
    Didn't Brazil try to adopt a European style a few years back to
    accomadate their ex-pats but have now switched again to their
    tradtional style ?


    Peter(You Know who).
129.1157Exit left....GVA05::BURKHALTERWed Nov 24 1993 13:253
    Taylor and Mcmennemmmmy resigned today according to VTX news....
    
    -Dom (the other one)
129.1158FORTY2::ROBERTSONWed Nov 24 1993 15:281
A bit late. see 326.*
129.1159I wanted confirmation.....GVA05::BURKHALTERWed Nov 24 1993 17:283
    Its only true when it appears in VTX....
    
    -Dom :-)
129.1160GALVIA::SPAINsigned long gary();Sat Nov 27 1993 19:1010
    
    This time 2 years ago I received an internal mail envelope with
    pictures of Gary Lineker's equaliser v Poland and comments along the
    lines of "We're going to Sweden you're not."  Needless to say they were
    much appreciated.  Unfortunately the sender forgot to include his name
    and address.  I would like to return the favour so if the person in
    question would care to mail me I can send photographs of Alan
    McLoughlin's goal v Northern Ireland and Denis Bergkamp in return.
    
    Gary.