[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference rusure::math

Title:Mathematics at DEC
Moderator:RUSURE::EDP
Created:Mon Feb 03 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2083
Total number of notes:14613

782.0. "Infinite sums, from USENET" by ZFC::DERAMO (Daniel V. D'Eramo) Fri Nov 06 1987 01:14

Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: decwrl!labrea!rutgers!sunybcs!boulder!news
Subject: Lunchtime Diversions
Posted: 4 Nov 87 18:11:57 GMT
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
 
[  munch  ]
From: rolan@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Rolan Christofferson)
Path: boulder!rolan
 
   Here's a problem I developed from a Putnam exam problem:
 
notation:
 sum(i,j=1,inf) f(i,j)  :=  sum(i=1 to inf) {sum(j=1 to inf) f(i,j) }
 
                          -1
  sum(i =1,inf) [ i(i+1) ]    =   1                    easy
 
 
                               -1
  sum(i,j =1,inf) [ ij(i+j+1) ]    =   2               good problem
 
 
                                    -1
  sum(i,j,k =1,inf) [ ijk(i+j+k+1) ]    =   6          long
 
 
    conjecture:
                                                         -1
  sum(i ,i , ... ,i  =1,inf)[ i *...*i *(1+i + ... +i ) ]     =   n!
       1  2        n           1      n     1        n
 
I am unable to prove the conjecture by induction.  Any ideas?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
782.1Spoiler for the "easy" oneZFC::DERAMODaniel V. D'EramoFri Nov 06 1987 01:2316
     "Spoiler" for the "easy" case:

     sum(i = 1,n) 1/i(i+1) = sum(i = 1,n) [1/i - 1/(i+1)]
                           = 1 - 1/2
                               + 1/2 - 1/3
                                    ...
                                       + 1/n - 1/(n+1)
                           = 1 - 1/(n+1)

     I think that this process is called "collapsing."

     sum(i = 1,inf) 1/i(i+1) = lim n->oo sum(i = 1,n) 1/i(i+1)
                             = lim n->oo (1 - 1/(n+1))
                             = 1

     Dan
782.2"good problem" -- the two variable caseZFC::DERAMODaniel V. D'EramoFri Nov 06 1987 02:2639
     Prove:  sum(i=1,inf) sum(j=1,inf) 1/ij(i+j+1) = 2

     First, 1/(i+j) - 1/(i+j+1) = 1/(i+j)(i+j+1)

                      (i+j)        1          1   1   1      1
     so 1/ij(i+j+1) = ----- * ------------ = (- + -)(--- - -----)
                        ij    (i+j)(i+j+1)    i   j  i+j   i+j+1

     so sum(i=1,inf) sum(j=1,inf) 1/ij(i+j+1)

          = sum(i=1,inf) sum(j=1,inf) (1/i + 1/j)(1/(i+j) - 1/(i+j+1))

          = sum(i=1,inf) sum(j=1,inf) (1/i)(1/(i+j) - 1/(i+j+1))
          + sum(i=1,inf) sum(j=1,inf) (1/j)(1/(i+j) - 1/(i+j+1))

          = 2 * sum(i=1,inf) sum(j=1,inf) (1/i)(1/(i+j) - 1/(i+j+1))

                [because the two infinite sums are equal]

          = 2 * sum(i=1,inf) (1/i) sum(j=1,inf) (1/(i+j) - 1/(i+j+1))

          = 2 * sum(i=1,inf) (1/i)(1/(i+1)) [the inner sum collapses]

          = 2 * 1                [using the results of .-1]

          = 2

    Hint for inductive proofs:


                                                   1
     sum(i1=1,inf) ... sum(in=1,inf) -----------------------------
                                     i1 i2 ... in (i1+i2+...+in+1)

     [i.e., the sum for n variables] may split up into n copies
     of the infinite sum for n-1 variables.  This would explain
     the conjecture in .0 that the sum for n variables is n!

     Dan
782.3how the usenet did it -- very short outlineZFC::DERAMODaniel V. D'EramoThu Nov 12 1987 21:5310
    The solutions on the usenet were clever.  A variable "z" was
    stuck into the infinite sum, and the sum renamed to f(z).
    The derivative f'(z) was much easier to identify, and then
    integration identified f(z).  The original infinite sum was
    f(1).  The "induction step" was an integration by parts to get
    the n variable integral from the n+1 variable integral.  Finally,
    one person added a proof that all these manipulations were of
    series that really did converge.
    
    Would anyone care to work out the details?
782.4oopsZFC::DERAMOCan I take your personal name?Mon Jan 18 1988 22:207
    Re .1
    
>>       I think that this process is called "collapsing."
    
    Actually, I think it is called "telescoping."
    
    Dan