[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference rusure::math

Title:Mathematics at DEC
Moderator:RUSURE::EDP
Created:Mon Feb 03 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2083
Total number of notes:14613

681.0. "Can this recurrence be periodic?" by CLT::GILBERT (eager like a child) Sun Mar 22 1987 21:50

Suppose you have a non-trivial sequence of numbers such that each element
is the sum of the k previous elements.  Is it possible for the sequence
to be periodic?


(This problem is from Prof. Walter Mientka, and originated with one of
his students.  It's been making the rounds on the usenet, with some
interesting results, but there *is* a simple solution).
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
681.1Yes!VIDEO::OSMANEric, dtn 223-6664, weight 146Mon Mar 23 1987 17:130
681.2CLT::GILBERTeager like a childMon Mar 23 1987 21:351
The trivial solutions have all elements equal to some constant, of course.
681.3CLT::GILBERTeager like a childSun Apr 12 1987 16:0110
Spoiler follows.


Let x[n] = Sum (i=1 to k) of x[n-i].  Then x[n+1] - x[n] = x[n] - x[n-k],
or x[n] = (x[n+1]+x[n-k])/2.  If the sequence is periodic, there must be
a maximal element -- let it be x[m].  But x[m] is the average of two other
elements (x[m+1] and x[m-k]); thus these three must all be equal.  Since
x[m] = x[m+1], x[m+1] is also a maximal element, and the same analysis
implies that *all* the elements are equal.  Thus, there are only trivial
solutions -- all elements equal.