T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
241.1 | inmate justice | MCIS2::POLLITZ | | Thu Jun 30 1988 00:51 | 11 |
| My understanding is that prisoners do not like sex offenders
at all. A police officer has told me that said offenders
are "taken care of", particularly in hardened major prisons.
I think prison overcrowding is such that separating them from
others may not be practical.
So I don't think they last long.
Russ P.
|
241.2 | Social position | NSSG::FEINSMITH | | Thu Jun 30 1988 11:32 | 7 |
| Prisons have their own pecking order, with sex offenders just about
at the bottom (I believe that child molesters hold the bottom most
rung). Depending on what you're serving time for, your social position
goes up from there. There life behind the walles is pretty miserable
(but considering what they're doing time for, perhaps well deserved).
Eric
|
241.3 | Why | WILKIE::M_SMITH | Building a Better Yesterday! | Thu Jun 30 1988 18:40 | 5 |
| Why would that sort of life be any more deserved for a sex offender
than for, say, a murderer? (not defending sex offenders particularly,
just wondering.)
Mike
|
241.4 | having talked to an ex con | DANUBE::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Thu Jun 30 1988 18:59 | 9 |
| Our handiman did time in Concord MCI a few years ago. The way he
explains it is something like a pecking order. The guys who are
in for murder or assault and battery or theft are at the top of
the heap. The sex offenders and child molesters are at the bottom.
Men in for those crimes - especially child molesters - are treated
*very* badly. It is not a subject that we discussed in any great
detail - as you might imagine.
Bonnie
|
241.5 | | FSLENG::HEFFERN | we make it harder than it has to be | Fri Jul 01 1988 09:16 | 21 |
| I sat on the grand jury for about six months. We had numerous
cases involving sexual offenders. In a couple of cases we had
the prosecuting attornies (not even the defense) suggesting
we try to see our way clear to reducing a charge or two that
the criminal may be assigned to a minimum security prison rather
than maximum to give him a better chance. They told us that life
is not too long for these people.
I sat and listened to three little girls tell me about this guy
playing show and tell with them, and wanted nothing less for that
man what was waiting for him in prison. These girls had to point
to indicate to us what they meant by "boobies" and "privates"
not fully comprehending what had happened to them. It made me
sick. Let alone the rape cases!
You ask about murderers, well there are many that feel they should
get what they dished out also.
cj
|
241.6 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert A. Holt | Mon Jul 04 1988 01:52 | 9 |
|
re -.1
If the intent is to punish child molesters by having them
raped in prison, then the sentence should say that.
If they are sentenced only to do time, then sikking
the cons on him strikes me as unconstitutional.
Revenge is not the aim of our legal code.
|
241.7 | more | AIMHI::RAUH | | Tue Jul 05 1988 17:17 | 15 |
| I think the reason for the short life span for child molestors is
that these guys could be back on the streets for good behaivior
in a short peroid of time. And some of the other cons may have kids
of their own whom they feel that the CM would be out there possibly
at their own kids! Yes, our justice system may not be the best,
but it is the lives of the victoms that are at stake. Perhaps it
is one thing to terminate anothers life who is an adult. It is
certainly another to scar the mind of a child for life, who has no
intention of harming any one. Or still does not realize fully right
from wrong. Yes, there is help for these folks, and I am not here
to debait it. I am just looking at it from perhaps the logic from
behind the wall.
George
|
241.8 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopeless but not serious | Tue Jul 05 1988 19:42 | 21 |
| From what I've seen, the sex offender is very likely to do very
"hard" time and, not infrequently, other convicts will shorten
the person's sentence in the most extreme manner. Often the
individual convicted of a sex offense will try to lie about the
crime, siting something more "acceptable" in prison society like
burglary. As someone said, prisoners have their own pecking order
and social mores. Usually such lies are unsuccessful as prisons
are pretty close societies and, in most prisons, there are trustees
with access to most/all prisoner information (court records, etc.).
I'm reminded of this (true) instance: several years ago in Texas,
a convicted child molester made parole. Some months later he was
re-arrested on a relatively minor sex offense which, severity of
crime notwithstanding, broke his parole. While in jail awaiting
his parole revocation hearing, he hanged himself. The note he left
said it was a better way to go than going back to the joint. I
suspect he was right.
Steve
|
241.9 | Comes from x'periences in childhood | PSG::GUPTA | Its bay bridge series in 88 | Tue Jul 05 1988 23:40 | 6 |
| A study done a while ago disclosed that most criminals had
been abused physically/sexually in their childhood. Hence the intense
hatred for sexual-offenders in their hearts. (esp if they offender
a child.)
Anil.
|
241.10 | a personal, albeit prejudiced opinion | CYBORG::TREPANIER | | Thu Aug 04 1988 13:40 | 10 |
|
Too many times a child molester will end up in a "treatment center"
like Bridgewater. Although incarcerated, their life is by no means
the living hell they have created for their victims. Unfortunately,
I have little compassion for adults who abuse children, and I would
feel they had been better punished by being sent to real prison
and dealt with in that society, than sent to a "treatment center"
and supported for their lives or until they can have the Sexually
Dangerous Person label removed, and return [shudder] to our world.
|
241.11 | Just Deserts | SLOVAX::HASLAM | | Wed Aug 10 1988 19:40 | 6 |
| Having a daughter who was raped when whe was nine and seen the low
self-esteem she has exhibited during her teenage years, I cannot
help but feel that whatever child molesters receive as an inmate
is what they deserve.
Barb
|
241.12 | | ENGINE::FRASER | Amor vincit Insomnia | Thu Aug 11 1988 17:32 | 11 |
| Re: rapists...
Chemical castration for the first offence, lasting for a set
period, with full castration for any repeat offence following
discontinuation of the chemical treatment.
(That's the liberal side of me - my gut feeling says _chop_ on
the first offence, especially when a child is involved.)
Andy
|
241.13 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopeless but not serious | Thu Aug 11 1988 19:12 | 17 |
241.14 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Who stole the kishkas? | Thu Aug 11 1988 20:16 | 2 |
|
Are we about justice, or are we about revenge?
|
241.15 | Do you have children? | CASV01::SALOIS | Fatal Attraction is holding me fast | Fri Aug 12 1988 12:24 | 4 |
|
.14
REVENGE!
|
241.17 | | SCAVAX::AHARONIAN | this one's in Technicolor | Fri Aug 12 1988 16:18 | 7 |
| < Note 241.16 by AERIE::THOMPSON "tryin' real hard to adjust ..." >
Eagle, don't you mean eaglets? :^}
GCA/
|
241.19 | New Jewelry | RUTLND::KUPTON | Goin' For The Top | Fri Aug 12 1988 19:34 | 6 |
| Revenge is best served cold......call me iceman.
If a man molested one of my daughters, I personally tear his hangers
off and wear them as earrings.
Ken
|
241.20 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Rastaman no pickpocket | Sat Aug 13 1988 01:50 | 10 |
|
You would do that before or after the fair trial?
How would you determine you had the right guilty
party?
Is this the way we should deal with all crime ?
(Probably a dumb question, given the predispostion
to vigilantism of most New Englanders...)
|
241.21 | | QBUS::WOOD | A Sunday kind of love..... | Sat Aug 13 1988 04:49 | 11 |
|
Glad to hear it, .19.....
Then there are those "fathers" who when told their daughter
was "date-raped" calmly say...."Oh, well, she probably wanted it!"
And she was only 14??!!??!! That's one father I'd like to hang!
My
|
241.22 | | CLBMED::KLEINBERGER | Dont worry, Be happy | Sun Aug 14 1988 13:26 | 42 |
| To answer your question - justice or revenge...
Both... The justice part right now seems to be the easiest part..
the state steps right in, and does everything for you... The DA
almost ignores you in fact!.. In Mass they assign you a victim/witness
advocate that (at least in my daughters case) in absolutely wonderful.
There is also in Mass a rape crisis center that assigns you a
counselor, and does neat stuff besides the therapy. The one my
daughter has assigned took her to the court room before she had
to testify before the grand jury.
The hard part is in the waiting... even after the grand jury
indictment(s!), we have to wait up to a year (possibly!) for the
trial... Talk about having that over any person's head... how are
they supposed to function (ie school)...
On the other hand.. here is a man - locked up in jail, but only
a holding type jail (for those in Mass, the one on top of the Cambridge
court house).. and having practically the time of his life?... Yeah,
he can't walk the streets (THANK GOD!), but he could IF he could
make his bail (that was a mistake even in itself - granting someone like
that bail)... he gets everything handed to him on a silver platter
I'm sure!... Revenge - hell yes!... I'd rather see him a dark and
grungy (sp?) basement!... Thats where my daughter is emotionally!...
She can't even live in the same portion of the state anymore!!!..
She really did try, but when she ran into this persons brother the
other week, her hands actually swelled up... and how do you handle
the nightmares????... She is in a jail herself...
Revenge - HELL yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....
But then the other side of me says, he is sick, and needs help to
function in this world.... I want him to get the treatment he needs
to get better, so he can see what he did and why... I still want
him to pay - however, nothing he can go through will equal what
my daughter is going through - nothing at all!
When you look at the very last sentence - I guess Revenge or justice
really doessn't matter does it?
From someone who is there right now.
|
241.23 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopeless but not serious | Sun Aug 14 1988 22:21 | 31 |
| re: .20
Well said (asked), Bob. Those are exceedingly important questions
to be asked and answered and, if we are to see a better world, the
answers must make as much sense intellectually as they do emotionally.
This topic is one that can't help but evoke a lot of powerful feelings
in people and that's not a problem in and of itself. But deciding
the law in a state of high passion can lead down some mighty tough
roads. Please understand, in no way do I mean for these words to
imply that I want to treat sex offenders "nicely". I don't. But
I believe that vengence alone is not the answer and my reason is
quite pragmatic.
Some day, most of these convicted felons *will* be on the streets again.
I agree with Gale (.22) that the fact of the matter is that both
the "criminal justice" system embraces both justice *and* revenge
(or, punishment). It, like ourselves, is imperfect and reflects
our ambivalence. On the one hand, I want to "take these slimeballs
and crush their faces." On the other, I want to "cure these sick
people so that they come out of the rehabilitative process with
a deep sense of remorse, an unswerving sense of penitence, and
a driving need to do what they can to prevent others from committing
such crimes and to do anything necessary to help the victim reach
a point of health/sanity/peace of mind.
To say the least, there are no easy answers here.
Steve
|
241.25 | ex | RUTLND::KUPTON | Goin' For The Top | Mon Aug 15 1988 16:59 | 27 |
| re:20
My daughters are 9 & 13 -> No trial required
If my kids pointed the person out, when I confronted them, I'd know
if they were the right person.
In the case of kids, This is how we deal. Result would be that assault
on children would become non-existent. The only reason that the
death penalty does not work is that it is not carried out quick
enough or often enough to dissuade violent/viscious crime.
FWIW..Read last week's people magazine about the young girl who
was raped and sodomized, had her arms cut off by her attacker with
an axe and stuffed her into a drain pipe. She somehow survived and
filed charges. The man was found guilty. Ask her if she feels the
4-1/2 years the guy did in prison fit the atrocity of the crime
committed against her. Why even bother to prosecute the guy??? A
little vigilante justice may have suited much better. Think about
the nightmares that this woman must live with for the rest of her
life......and the attacker says he's sorry now....big deal.
I could say that .20 is the wimp, bleeding heart liberal, let some
one else do the nasty stuff, left coast attitude......but I won't.
Ken
|
241.26 | | ANT::BUSHEE | Living on Blues Power | Mon Aug 15 1988 17:37 | 7 |
|
RE: .24
No Mike, we put them in prison complete with color TV's, stereos
and other comforts, then after they have been "rehabilitated",
we set them free on the streets to assult the next victim. This
is our current system..
|
241.28 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Philosopher Clown | Mon Aug 15 1988 19:38 | 100 |
241.29 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Philosopher Clown | Mon Aug 15 1988 19:49 | 17 |
| re: .27
". . .our current system is primarily based on revenge. The ultimate
example of this is, of course, the death penalty. . ."
This depends on your point of view. Personally, knowing what I
do about life in the joint, if I were staring at anything greater
than a 20 yr. sentence with no parole possibility (I'm in my 40s),
you'd find me hanging in my cell one morning. Under today's system,
if you *really* want revenge, I submit that a life-with-no-parole
sentence is a far nastier punishment, especially if you can eliminate
the possibility of suicide.
Despite the above, I think your remarks are well said, Mike.
Steve
|
241.30 | Survival first; then justice. | XCELR8::HARDY | The night time is the Right time... | Tue Aug 16 1988 02:26 | 60 |
|
Re: .20
"...the predisposition to vigilantism of most New Englanders."
Oh, really? Upon what sociolgical research data do you base this
interesting conclusion, Mr. Holt? Or did you just wake up with
a little tummy ache from the previous night's scorpion soup? It
is becoming obvious even to Left Coast habitues that our current
most famous New Englander is hardly predisposed to anything so
fascist as vigilantism...he, in fact, has no problem allowing
dangerous felons to roam far and wide across the land wreaking
havoc, pain, and terror along their merry way, perhaps even in
the land of the lotus-eaters, California...stay tuned.
The points by Mr. Mallett and Mr. Valenza are well-taken, and
I appreciate the reasoned thought behind them. However, I would
also point out that there are large numbers of us out here who
have had many and varied experiences, mostly less than desirable,
with our criminal justice system. Some of us, or people we know
and love, have been victimized very badly; once by the original
perpetrator/s, and then again by the system. (A National Crime
Survey finding is that one in four American households is hurt
by criminal violence or theft each year.) Stephen J. Markman,
Assistant Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice has
said that "Government owes the public a criminal-justice system
which inspires confidence that the innocent will be protected and
the guilty punished." I feel that when the government either
cannot, or will not, fulfill its legal contract with us in this
regard, it has then forfeited our allegiance accordingly, and it
then becomes incumbent upon us to protect ourselves and our loved
ones as best we may. Apparently, a fairly significant number of
individuals has been able, over these most recent decades, via
the liberal courts, academia, and the Fourth Estate, to circumvent
any semblance of justice, rehabilitation, or even revenge, and
to inflict their mayhem on the rest of us. This is patently
unacceptable, and will not be tolerated by a free people. It is
time that we recognize that there are most definitely some persons
among us who are beyond such concepts as justice and rehabilitation,
at least in this life, and that the best we can hope for, for the
sake of us *and* them, is to keep them caged away from us. Let
me hasten to add that I have always been against capital punishment,
and as a former police officer and soldier, I detest ad hoc
vigilantism. I applaud the alternatives of mandatory sentencing,
and life (at hard labor) without parole. Forget furloughs for
those convicted of violent crimes.
Education and rehabilitation should be available to those who
sincerely want it. But my concern for a convicted criminal's re-
habilitation, material comforts, environmental factors, childhood
trauma, and spiritual well-being begin with the safe removal of
his knife from my, my family's, and my neighbors' throats. When
that occurs to our satisfaction, then we will be glad to sit down
with the prisoner, the concerned liberals, and the victims (remember
them?) and see if we can work something out.
My heartfelt sympathy to those of you who have courageously,
and painfully, indicated in this topic, what your children and
you have gone through. God bless.
Dave
|
241.31 | Kudos | HANDY::MALLETT | Philosopher Clown | Tue Aug 16 1988 04:29 | 60 |
| re: .30
Now *that's* a reply! I doubt I could agree more. I'd be interested
to hear more of your thoughts, Dave. While I am, at least in theory,
committed to the notion that no human is absolutely beyond help,
I readily acknowledge that there seem to be a few individuals who
are so damned close that the difference is extremely small.
The main reason I espouse a serious approach to rehabilitation is
not for the benefit of the perp. It is the "victim" (i.e. society
in general as well as, possibly, the individual victim of a particular
crime) whom I'm concerned about. It's essentially a pragmatic
view:
1) Most prisons are not successful at rehabilitating cons
2) Most cons learn more about crime and become more hardend
in most prisons
3) Prisons do provide cons with lots of time to think; unfortunately
those thoughts are all too often about what the con will do
to "get even" when (s)he gets out
4) It is extremely unlikely (prohibitively expensive, for one thing)
that we will ever simply take all criminals and lock them up
for life or kill them
5) Most cons become ex-cons
I submit that until we understand this as a society, the problem
will get only marginally better. Again, ethics don't weigh into
this argument. Until there are *real* efforts at rehabilitation,
it seems to me that the forces at work above will yield us more
criminals on the streets with harder attitudes.
BTW, "Real reahb for those who *demonstrate* that they really want
it and see you around the cell block, Charlie, for those who don't"
is spot on, for my money.
And I share your concerns (also as an ex-cop) about ad hoc vigilantism;
very dangerous stuff.
And, in honesty, I'm not optimistic. I have a very difficult time
believing the American public is ready, especially in today's political
climate, to shell out the kind of money that would make a serious
difference to prison rehabilitative programs.
And I don't think it's very likely that we, as a nation, will choose
to throw even more dollars at the root causes of crime - poverty,
ignorance, bigotry, and the like.
It seems to me more likely that calls for more police, tougher laws,
tougher sentences, and (some) more prisons (tho' not in *my* town,
thank you very much) will probably get a lot more votes. I suppose
part of this is because it *seems* like this should be the quickest
solution to the problem. For my money, it's akin to treating a
tumor with (a couple more) aspirin.
Steve (ex-cop, ex-con, and, at 12:25, a.m. ex-hausted zzzzzzzzzzz)
|
241.32 | Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't | XCUSME::KING | Give me a Challenge | Tue Aug 16 1988 06:07 | 38 |
| Recently I wrote a letter to colunmist Mike Barnicle about his column
in Thursday 11 August edition of the Boston Globe. If any of you
recall the column it was about a girl named Mary Beth Lenane who
owns a variety store in Dorchester. She is in her early 20's and
that was her lifelong dream, to open a corner neighborhood store.
Well it seems a couple of guys(for lack of a better word that would
be considered inappropriate in notes)saw it as an easy way to make
a living by holding up her store. They did so and several times
beat her. Once they raped her. So as far as they were concerned
what she made was theirs for the taking and the taking just kept
going on. Since Massachusetts is so lenient with its bail laws
on sexual offenders they were allowed to walk. One of them tryed
to threaten her from testifying by strangling her with a clothesline.
Its my belief that people like this should not be allowed to walk
the streets but instead should go to prison for a while say 10 years
and experience a miserable way of life. That is what the prison
expreience is all about, punishment for crimes against society.
If they go to prison and are victims of rape well they should have
thought about the consequences of their actions. They deserve
it. Lets see how the show fits on the other foot.
As far as the prison experience goes. Some individuals it does
not work. They are not reformed convicts when they return to society
but instead are more hardened criminals. Others learn by their
prison experiences.
Several years back, a couple of guys I went to high school with
were convicted in the beating death of a college student in Boston.
I won't mention names or where it took place. Anyhow they were
given long stretches at Cedar Junction. One guy was there for about
1 1/2 years and he freaked out. So they sent him next door to the
minimum lockup Norfolk. Where I believe he still is. When he went
in he was a tough city kid, now who knows. He may have learned
his lesson.
Bryan
|
241.40 | Cut and Dried | BETSY::WATSON | No_Mad | Mon Aug 22 1988 16:51 | 44 |
| If there's one thing I'm tired of hearing it's "there isn't enough money
to build and maintain all the prisons we'd need to put every criminal
behind bars". It should only take enough money to get the thing built;
maintaining it should be the job of the inmates. Make 'em work for their
daily bread, and any other niceties they may desire. No work = no food.
Cruel and unusual, I suppose some will say, but why should society pay
(again and again) for their crimes?
As far as executing murderers and rapists, fine, as long as there is *no*
doubt as to whom the perpetrator is. If (s)he's caught in the act - with
witnesses, I mean - then hangin's not good enough. When there is some
doubt as to the guilt, then life at hard labor will suffice until which
time more evidence may be presented by the defense. As far as worrying
about one member of the jury not wanting to impose the death penalty, I
say punishment = crime, whereupon, you kill or rape, you get your just
deserts. No two ways. The law should dictate the punishment to equal the
crime, not a jury of one's peers.
.39> So far it appears from examples like Drunk
.39> Driving that a tougher arrest, prosecution and punishment policy must
.39> be used because as obviously un-neccessary as it is for adults to drive
.39> while in an intoxicated condition ... without real "teeth" in the legal
.39> system ... people were doing it in sufficient numbers to force the issue.
Actually, as many if not more people have been arrested for drunk driving
as before the stiffer laws/penaties went into affect. This (in my opinion)
is one argument against the death penalty having any sort of affect on
prevention of serious crimes against individuals. But whether or not it
convinces anyone not to commit murder or rape, doing away with the scumbags
will certainly prevent them from ever doing it again.
.38>> Yes, if we executed past rapists, it would prevent them from committing
.38>> rape in the future.
.39> ... and it would act as a greater deterrent against other potential
.39> rapists who might lack the "moral" values to refrain from doing it in the
.39> first place ...
Unfortunately, those about to commit a crime of passion, be it murder or rape,
DO NOT, as I stated above, consider the consequences just before they strike.
Only a moral person does so, and is therefore unlikely to be caught with his
pants down in an embarrassing, possibly illegal, situation in the first place.
Kip (who_basically_agrees_with_Eagles_but_wishes_they_weren't_so_lonnggg_winded)
|
241.42 | | RANCHO::HOLT | I seen 'em..! | Wed Aug 24 1988 02:11 | 11 |
|
Excuse me, but I'm a little offended at the painting of
Iranians as some kind of subhuman species...
We live with them here and I find them perfectly wonderful
and gentle folk. True, they can become excitable, but not the
beasts that you would portray.
Somehow I though the East was more cosmopolitan...
|
241.43 | | QUARK::LIONEL | In Search of the Lost Code | Wed Aug 24 1988 02:54 | 7 |
| Re: .42
Please don't tar all of us on the East coast due to the peculiar
views of individuals. I am proud to count several Iranians among
my friends and coworkers.
Steve
|
241.44 | Everyone???? | RAVEN1::TYLER | Try to earn what Lovers own | Wed Aug 24 1988 11:34 | 5 |
| How do you think we see them when the news about them is always
on the down side. I myself think that there has to be some good
folk every where you go. But what do I know. ;-)
Ben
|
241.46 | Americans usually cop to cultural blindness when asked | SKYLRK::OLSON | green chile crusader! | Wed Aug 24 1988 16:06 | 5 |
| Perhaps a contrast with prisons in Turkey might have been better
received, as we've at least had one look into such a horror (I'm
referring to the movie "Midnight Express").
DougO ( Who_is_suprised_to_be_recommending_ANYTHING_2_Eagles )
|
241.48 | HUMAN????? | MCIS2::AKINS | | Thu Aug 25 1988 03:38 | 17 |
| After seeing the results of paternal insest on a good friend of
mine, I think that what the offenders get in prison is just. The
psychological affects of such an act has completely destroyed the
lives of many people. She was not able to have a normal relationship
with a man. She felt the only way to feell love was to sleep with
someone. Her mother also is an emotional wreck. Her friends have
been betrayed and lied to because she has become a cronic lier to
cover for what has happened to her. Is it just for an innocent
girl (about 11 years old at the time) to have her life completely
destroyed? I used to be for the death penalty, now I'm not. If
we can send the monsters who do this to a place where it will
happen to them over and over I'm all for it! I believe in the rights
of all humans, but in my mind those who refuse to act like humans
(no matter what their excuse) deserve to get what ever they dished
out. I usually don't think "an eye for an eye..." but this is one
exception!!!!
|
241.49 | Think first | LEDS::LEWICKE | | Tue Sep 19 1989 23:53 | 39 |
| I hate to reopen a rathole that's already been closed, but...
When considering appropriate punishment for sex offenders it is
necessary to consider secondary effects that stiffer sentences might
have. If we make the penalties for sex offenses effectively as severe
as those for murder, then there is less to deter the offender from
murdering the victim. As a father, I would rather have a live child
than one who was murdered by some creep who figured to eliminate any
witness/victim.
As we are all aware there are serial killer/sex offenders who
murder more than one victim. These criminals are harder to catch, more
difficult to convict and do more harm before they are caught than do
simple sex offenders. Can we afford to make sentences for simple sex
offenses so severe that more serial killers occur? How many of the
serial killers murdered their first victim because they were afraid of
the penalty for the rape that they had committed?
I think it might be reasonable to allow a reduction in sentence for
sex offenders who choose to have themselves neutered, if this can be
shown to eliminate or greatly reduce their tendancy to violence. I
think that most people, including the criminals, realize that there is
somthing wrong with them, and in their more lucid moments they might
wish to be cured of this wrongness.
-----------------------
On the subject of rape in prison:
Rape is a crime whether it is committed in prison or outside. The
criminal should be punished accordingly. Presently we are letting a
certain class of violent sex offenders have a field day in prison. In
some cases the prison rapists are in there for commiting the same crime
that they are allowed to commit in prison with impunity. Some of them
come out and commit homosexual rape on the outside. Does someone who
has committed a relatively minor crime (car theft, minor drug offense,
etc.) deserve to be subjected to rape while in prison? Part of the
reason that our property is unsafe is that the judicial system is
unwilling to make property offenders into rape victims.
A few points to consider.
John
|