[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference quark::mennotes-v1

Title:Topics Pertaining to Men
Notice:Archived V1 - Current file is QUARK::MENNOTES
Moderator:QUARK::LIONEL
Created:Fri Nov 07 1986
Last Modified:Tue Jan 26 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:867
Total number of notes:32923

820.0. "MOM NEEDS ADVICE...." by JULIET::UCCI_SA (You were better as a fantasy) Wed Aug 12 1992 16:58

    Advice needed!!
    
    My only son joined the Navy in Feb 1991.  I just received notification
    from the Navy that he has been AWOL for over 30 days and is being
    listed as a deserter and his file has been given to the National Crime
    Information Center.
    
    I talked with my son last on June 22nd.  It was the usual type of
    conversation.  He was working and had leave for the weekend.  He was
    stationed in Bremerton, Washington.  According to the Navy, he skipped
    out on the 23rd of June.
    
    Can anyone tell me what happens next, and what's a mother to do?
    
    My son hasn't contacted me or any of his relatives or friends in my
    neighborhood.  Do you think he might have gone to Canada?
    
    Any advice would be appreciated.
    
    Sandie
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
820.1COMET::DYBENWed Aug 12 1992 18:5611
    
    
    Sandie,
    
     It might be helpful to access Defense_issues, not sure of the exact
    pointer. I believe your son would be prosecuted under the appropriate
    law, as applies in the Uniform Code of Military Justice. I hope everything
    turns out for the best. Hang in there..
    
    
    David
820.2Thank you...JULIET::UCCI_SAYou were better as a fantasyWed Aug 12 1992 19:113
    Thanx for the pointer.  I'm off to the DEFENSE conference.
    
    Sandie
820.3COMET::DYBENWed Aug 12 1992 19:167
    
    
    Sandie,
    
      I looked up the node (it's my own :-) ) Comet::defense_issues.
    
    David
820.4BSS::P_BADOVINACFri Aug 14 1992 18:1231
       There are a couple of considerations for you:

       1.  The Navy will try and scare the hell out of the parents in case
       the AWOL serviceman shows up or calls.  They will want the parents
       to coerce him into returning.  What he has done is serious but
       they're not going to execute him.

       2.  Under the UCMJ he will be prosecuted in a Military court of some
       kind depending on how long he stays gone and several other factors
       including a biggee called:

       2a. Missing ship's (or any unit) movement.  This means that if he is
       stationed aboard a ship and that ships leaves it's bearth while he
       is AWOL, they will add those charges to AWOL.

       The reason I know all this is because I was in the Navy.  When the
       Navy wouldn't let me have leave before I went to Vietnam I went AWOL
       for about 45 days.  I went through the entire gambit.  My advice to
       you is:

       1.  Remain calm, the Navy will not execute your son although he will
       be punished depending on how long he stays gone.

       2.  Do what you can to locate him and strongly encourage him to
       return.  Tell him to contact the Chaplain if he is having problems
       coping.

       3.  Remind yourself that he is responsible for this action not you.

       Patrick
820.5UTROP1::SIMPSON_D$SH QUO: You have 0 miracles leftMon Aug 17 1992 08:414
    The US armed services are among the few that are *serious* about
    tracking down the AWOL.  The Oz services figure that if they want out
    that much they're better off without them, and after about six months
    forget about it.
820.6SOLVIT::MSMITHSo, what does it all mean?Mon Aug 17 1992 12:176
    Actually, the US Military spends very little effort actually tracking
    down AWOL personnel.  Mostly, they just wait for them to either turn
    themselves in or come into the purview of some other law enforcement
    agency, or otherwise come into contact with the US goverment.  
    
    Mike
820.7UTROP1::SIMPSON_D$SH QUO: You have 0 miracles leftMon Aug 17 1992 12:233
    OK, that's more sensible.  Sounds like they've changed their minds
    fairly recently.  It wasn't that long ago they were trying to extradite
    a deserter from Nam who was in Oz.
820.8NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Mon Aug 17 1992 12:532
It's not surprising that the attitude towards deserters in peacetime is
more laid back than in war.
820.9UTROP1::SIMPSON_D$SH QUO: You have 0 miracles leftMon Aug 17 1992 13:345
    re .8
    
    That was my point.  This guy deserted from the US forces in Nam and
    twenty years later when he pops up in Oz the US tried to extradite him. 
    Bit of a waste of effort that long after the fact.
820.10NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Mon Aug 17 1992 14:252
I thought there was a general amnesty for Vietnam draft dodgers and deserters
during Jimmy Carter's administration.
820.11CRONIC::SCHULERDance to the rhythm of lifeMon Aug 17 1992 17:223
    Wasn't the amnesty just for draft-dodgers?
    
    /Greg
820.12AWOL?ASDG::DANGTue Aug 18 1992 16:451
Pardon my ignorance, but what is AWOL?  Thanks.
820.13VMSSG::NICHOLSConferences are like apple barrels...Tue Aug 18 1992 16:503
    Absent WithOut Leave
    
    Unauthorized absence.
820.14BLUMON::QUAYLETue Aug 18 1992 21:202
    Or
    Absence Without Official Leave
820.15just my opinions of courseNOVA::FISHERRdb/VMS DinosaurWed Aug 19 1992 11:2716
    The Amnesty was offered but persons had to apply for it.  Anyone
    not applying was still a deserter.  The case of draft dodgers
    may be different.
    
    AWOL: Away Without Official Leave, is, mentioned in .0, a charge
    for being away less than 30 days.  After 30 days it becomes
    desertion.  The difference between AWOL and desertion is like
    the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony.  In some
    cases desertion can be plea bargained down to AWOL.  If he
    shows up and the Navy wants to keep him it won't be too
    bad, if they are reducing forces it will be easy to give him
    1 to 6 months in a Navy prison and toss him out afterward.
    
    They won't look too hard for him, they don't have to.
    
    ed
820.16Prodigal ReturnsJULIET::UCCI_SAYou were better as a fantasyWed Aug 19 1992 13:527
    Thanx for all your advice.  I finally (through the original recruiter)
    was able to contact the Transient Personnel Unit in Bremerton to see
    what I could find out.  I was informed not to worry, my son was back on
    base.  Of course, he had already been through a court proceeding and
    will be discharged (Bad Conduct) the end of this month.
    
    Sandie
820.17SOLVIT::MSMITHSo, what does it all mean?Thu Aug 20 1992 13:4210
    I'm glad he came back and that you don't have the uncertainty of not
    knowing what's going on to deal with.  
    
    He may be able to make an application to have his discharge upgraded to
    one less onerous than a Bad Conduct discharge sometime in the near
    future.  This is not simply a matter of saving pride, but might help in
    restoring some veteran's benefits for which he might not otherwise be
    eligible.  
    
    Mike
820.18And...SMURF::BINDERUt aperies operaThu Aug 20 1992 16:046
    Having his discharge upgraded from Bad Conduct to General wil almost
    certainly make a huge difference in his possibilities for getting a job
    in the civilian marketplace!  A Bad Conduct discharge is an absolute
    red flag to employment personnel.
    
    -dick