Conference pcbuoa::server_works

202.0. "Serverworks and OS2 OS/2" by GVPROD::ZAVADIL () Mon Feb 03 1997 16:32

Any comments on other field experience for OS2 and Serverworks support?
    
    
    file pointer:
http://zav1.geo.dec.com  server srvworks os2  sw_os2.txt
cross posted on gvprod::prioris notes file
    
    
    
fm:Ennio Carrro @MLN, Jan 97
So far we bidded twice:
- we won 50 LX575, with os2 no problem (Italian Telecom)
- we still on going with 800 zx6166 quad proc (ENEL electricity board Italy)
We have had no problems in compatibility/support.IBM itself has been
cooperating  in this respect (their end user support free lines).
There is some support for SNMP agents. pls read attacched mails.
Hope this helps,
Ennio.
 

>                                        Date:     17-Jul-1996 01:00pm
>EDT
>                                        From:     ENNIO CARRARO @JPO
>                                                 
>CARRAROEN@A1@ITGATE@MLN
>                                        Dept:     Product Manager
>Server Prioris
>                                        Tel No:   
>
>TO:  Remote Addressee                     ( JOHN HARGREAVES@AKO )
>
>CC:  marc zavadil@geo
>
>Subject: U: WARPED ZX6 SNMP management from NETVIEW 6000             
>
>John,
>
>customer requires the software necessary to provide SNMP server 
>management from a AIX Netview station. It does not specify functions.
>>>Understood.


>They specify OS/2 op. sys (and WNT), so we must assume that for the 
>former they are going to use WARP server, therefore as we are told, 
>there is an SNMP agent included.
>>>Yes, we agree.  Engineering tested OS/2 WARP server today and discovered 
>>>that IBM has included a Host Resources Agent in the OS/2 software. 
Although >>>the testing is preliminary, we have discovered that
approximately 90% of the >>>ServerWORKS V1.1 functionality works
correctly when managing a Prioris Server >>>running OS/2.  Features
that don't work are limited to the NIC card and the 
>>>environmentals (voltages, temperature, fan status etc..)  Everything
else seems to
>>>work OK such as setting status and threshold alarms etc... That means
we would >>>not have to develop an OS/2 agent if your customer were
interested in managing >>>their OS/2 Prioris servers using
ServerWORKS Manager on a PC desktop...!  


>What we must be sure of, pls confirm, is the minimum level of 
>"service" provided by the combination of this agent on a ZX6 with 
>netview 6000 (i.e. identification of ZX ICON in the Netview map, alive 
>check,MIB browsing functions pls state). 
>>>We do not have Netview 6000/AIX here and therefore cannot test the
level of service
>>>realtime.  However, as I indicated to you in my earlier mail today,
Engineering >>>believes that you would be able to do some level of
'crude' manageability via the
>>>Netview MIB browser.  The server ICONs would be displayed in the
topology map
>>>as generic servers (not ZX6000 servers).  Minimum functionality using
Netview WS. 

>
>If any other optional software may improve this functionality, in the 
>netview 6000 environment, pls state it that we will quote it 
>(Netfinity? System View utilities?).
>>>Based on very preliminary research, it appears that SystemView will
provide a 
>>>significant amount of management for the OS/2 agent running on Prioris
servers.
>>>Functionality includes:

>>>	-Discovery of systems using TCP/IP	-Custom groups of servers
>>>	-Alert notification on viewer for problems	-Define alerts (CPU
Util.,
MemUsage)
>>>	-Monitor critical files & processes	-Remote log on	
>>>	-Account security/admin password	-SMS integration
>>>	-Software installation			-Software inventory 

>>>Additionally, you can integrate SystemView into Netview and 'launch'
the >>>SystemView GUI.  You would then be able provide the above
noted management.


>If there is no such possibility we are going to state in our offer 
>the minimum functions we provide, and the additional cost to provide  
>"normal" functions (pls list function, costs and time).
>
>Same for WNT. Here we have Sworks, but again, the management system is 
>NETVIEW 6000. Pls confirm functionalities we can ensure in this 
>environment, i.e. transmission of alarms and traps,etc.  
>>>We don't know if SystemView can manage Windows NT, or how much of
>>>Windows NT OS can managed from the Netview MIB browser.  Given the
limited >>>resources and time constraints we simply don't have this
information.

>>>Your customer would have the best management story if they would agree
to use
>>>ServerWORKS Manager either as the management console with OS/2, or as a 
>>>complete solution with Prioris servers running Windows NT.

>>>Regards/john 

>Thanks a lot for your support,
>
>Ennio.
>
>P.s. this bid must be ready by Friday at the latest. Pls give your 
>best answer by friday morning, but keep us informed on 
>progress. 
>
>