[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference nyoss1::market_investing

Title:Market Investing
Moderator:2155::michaud
Created:Thu Jan 23 1992
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1060
Total number of notes:10477

179.0. "Morris Smith of Fidelity Magellan quits" by COGITO::RAJA (its all a matter clients and servers) Wed Apr 29 1992 18:38

    Fidelity Magellan Fund Portfolio Manger Morris Smith has resigned.
    He took over from the famous Peter Lynch just a couple of years back.
    
    Any comments on the turnover rate !!
    
    /As raja
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
179.1here are some #s FYIMRCSSE::COLMANWed Apr 29 1992 19:3619
    Fidelity Magellan year-end NAV                 YEAR
    ==============================                 ====
    19.68					   1982
    34.25					   1983
    35.21					   1984
    37.69					   1985
    55.34					   1986
    59.85					   1987
    44.10					   1988
    52.92					   1989
    58.60					   1990
    64.84					   1991
    
    	Source:  prospectus
    
    I just happened to be reading the prospectus & thought the numbers
    might be of interest.  I wonder what the 1992 numbers will be?
    
    george
179.2CHESS::KAIKOWThu Apr 30 1992 07:013
re: 179.1

Those numbers have little use without also knowing what the dividends were.
179.3Smith suggests DCAASDG::WATSONThu Apr 30 1992 16:1514
    
    	I heard an interview with Mr Smith yesterday on CNBC. He 
    	is stepping down in order to "find himself". 
    
    	Geez, at 34 and riding the top of a $20B investment fund and
    	he's not sure what to do with his life? 
    
    	On his way out he gave this advice:
    	
    	1) Don't panic
    	2) Forgot this one
    	3) DCA your investments
    
    	Yipes,            
179.4OK, I'll ask,BASEX::GREENLAWI used to be an ASSET, now I'm a ResourceThu Apr 30 1992 17:143
What does DCA stand for??

Lee G.
179.5DCAWHELIN::ALANThu Apr 30 1992 17:152
    DCA stands for "Dollar Cost Averaging".
    
179.6NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Fri May 01 1992 20:211
If I made a million bucks a year for two years, I'd do exactly what he's doing.
179.7must be something elseEPIK::FINNERTYAsk not for whom the bell tolls, Mr. BugmeisterTue May 05 1992 16:057
    
    you don't suppose that he thought there might just be a wee bit too
    much risk in the market right now for a growth fund, do you?
    
    naaaaa  
    
    
179.8Jeff Vinik now quitsFREEBE::NEARYBob Neary Lexington,MassThu May 23 1996 16:123
    VINIK LEAVING TO START HIS OWN INVESTMENT FIRM.
    Although after his performance so far in 1996, wil anyone follow?
    
179.9SOLVIT::CHENThu May 23 1996 17:014
    It'll be interesting to see who will take on the monster next? Will
    they get Lynch back?   :-)
    
    Mike
179.10Vinik out: Stansky in DABEAN::NEARYBob Neary Lexington,MassThu May 23 1996 20:3312
    Bob Stanksy from Growth COmpany is taking Magellan.
    I've been w/Gro Co for a few years and really like Stanksy's record.
    Larry Greenberg from Emerging Growth (and Sel Envir and others) is
    taking Stanksy's place. 
    I'm debating moving my $ from Gro Co to Magellan to follow Stanksy.
    I called MFIA (I suscribe to this Fidelity newsletter) and they said 
    to stay put. There's a special report coming out tomorrow that I 
    should receive on Saturday. I'll report back next week about any
    info in letter.
    I had Sel Envir when Greenberg ran that for a few years: it went
    nowhere. His fault or market ?? I'm not sure, but I know what I'm
    losing in Stansky: not sure of what I'm getting in Greenberg.
179.11Greenberg did well for Emerg. GrwthIROCZ::SPIELMANJerry dtn 226-5588Tue May 28 1996 21:5714
    re Greenberg:  
    
    I haven't been following who was running Emerging Growth
    but in the last several years it has had a great record (though
    volatile). SO I wouldn't be nervous about Greenberg, except to remark
    that I don't think Fido wants Growth Co. to be as aggressive as
    Emerging Growth. If this is so, Greenberg will have to change his style
    for it and that means you just can't assume he'll continue as he has.
    
    The globe had a large section on the Fido changes last week which would
    say who is taking Greenberg's place at FDEGX. I don't recall who.
     
    
    
179.12As Time Magazine Reports ItUNXA::ZASLAWWed May 29 1996 14:5884
TIME Magazine

JUNE 3, 1996 Volume 147, No. 23


MAGELLAN'S NEW DIRECTION 

Steady Robert Stansky replaces the
controversial Jeffrey Vinik at the nation's
biggest mutual fund

JOHN GREENWALD 

Jeffrey Vinik, manager of the $56 billion Fidelity Magellan
Fund, the world's largest and most closely watched mutual fund,
"beat the pants off the managers of other large funds," in the
words of one analyst. Yet few people were surprised last week
when Vinik simply beat it, abruptly resigning from FMR Corp.,
Fidelity's owner. His replacement is Robert Stansky, until now a
low-profile manager of Fidelity's Growth Company Fund. 

While Vinik, 37, and the company denied that he was
pushed--and he most likely wasn't--the aggressive manager
had made the classic mistake of zigging when he should have
zagged. Last year he dumped stocks and bought bonds even as
the stock market routinely hit new highs. Although Vinik's
record of a 17.2% average return over nearly four years bested
most of his competition, Magellan's 4.3 million shareholders
fidgeted as the fund returned just 2.4% on an annualized basis in
the first four months of 1996, while the Standard & Poor's index
of 500 stocks, the gauge by which mutual-fund managers are
measured, returned 6.9%. Worse, at the end of April the tepid
showing had caused Magellan's average growth over three years
to trail that of the S&P 500 for the first time in Vinik's tenure.
"If you lag behind the index over three years, you can expect to
be out of there soon," says Jack Bowers, who edits the Fidelity
Monitor, a newsletter that tracks Fidelity. 

In fact, Vinik had become a lightning rod for the public's
perception of problems at Fidelity, a $442 billion cash machine
based in Boston, whose 238 mutual funds command a leading
13% share of the U.S. fund industry. Late last year Vinik drew
the attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission for
publicly touting computer maker Micron Technology while
Magellan quietly unloaded its Micron shares. This year Fidelity
shuffled no fewer than 26 fund managers in March to perk up
the funds' performance. 

Vinik, who plans to start his own investment company called
Vinik Asset Management, told TIME that he decided to leave
"in the past couple of weeks," after lengthy talks with his wife.
"It was a family decision," he explains. Up until now, he says, his
extended and successful stay at Fidelity had allowed him to
spend "good quality time" with his three children. He claims to
look back with satisfaction, having met a personal-performance
goal by consistently topping the S&P 500 index. "With 20/20
hindsight," he concedes, "I wish I hadn't bought bonds when I
did." Sounds just like the rest of us amateurs. 

The grueling job now passes to Stansky, 40, a highly regarded
Fidelity veteran who has headed the $17 billion Growth
Company Fund since 1987 and achieved healthy returns of
16.1% a year, including an 8.8% increase in the first four months
of 1996. The two managers are a study in contrasting
philosophies. Whereas Vinik made sweeping bets on entire
sectors of the economy, like technology, Stansky methodically
studies individual companies and favors blue-chip stocks over
the small- and medium-size companies that Vinik preferred, in
the manner of his mentor Peter Lynch. "Stansky will be a good
fit," says Don Phillips, president of Morningstar, which tracks
mutual funds. "What was always a little difficult for Vinik was
that he was trying to run Magellan as if it were a smaller, more
flexible fund." Stansky's approach promises less volatility in the
performance of the fund. That's not a bad idea, since Magellan is
fighting to stay high on the list of pension managers. The fund
gets 90% of its new money from 401(k) plans. 

Some experts say Magellan may have grown too large and
unwieldy for anyone to run effectively these days. Others point
to its high profile. "The problem with Magellan is that it's too
famous, and the scrutiny you're under is almost unbearable,"
says Phillips. "Your every move is second-guessed." 

--Reported by Sam Allis/Boston and Jane Van Tassel/New York 
179.132155::michaudJeff Michaud - ObjectBrokerFri May 31 1996 18:5214
	Well Magellan is affecting all the markets today.  As expected,
	the new manager of this fund is unloading bonds which Vinick
	had bought up last year.  The news is today Magellan is unloading
	a large amount of 10-year bonds.

	This is lowering prices on all the bonds, with the 30-year
	yield crossing back above the 7% level intra-day.  And
	of course when interest rates go up, the stock market goes
	done, which is exactly what's happening .....

	However I see this as a possible good sign as the proceeds from
	the sale of bonds has to go somewhere.  That means either Magellan
	is increasing it's cash position, ..... or will be increasing it's
	position in stocks .....
179.14bye bye bonds, hello stocksSHOGUN::JAMBU_SSkating away on the thin ice of a new dayFri Nov 15 1996 17:125