[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference terri::cars_uk

Title:Cars in the UK
Notice:Please read new conference charter 1.70
Moderator:COMICS::SHELLEYELD
Created:Sun Mar 06 1994
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2584
Total number of notes:63384

180.0. "Don't be (un)lead(ed) astray...." by ERIC::SALLITT (Dave @RKG or LZO) Tue May 31 1988 21:08

    My better half and I decided to be socially responsible and have
    her Nova Merit set for unleaded fuel, taking advantage of the Vauxhall
    offer of a free tweek. Now, after two weeks, we are having it put back
    to run on "proper" petrol; the overtaking performance was reduced
    below what we regard as safe, and the mpg went down - probably due
    to a heavier right foot trying to get along at the same pace. It
    also seemed more noisy, but that might be psychological.
    
    The Govt.'s fuel price incentive in no way compensated for what
    was lost, so beware if you plan to have your car "done" - we'll
    have to pay to get the performance back to normal, but it'll be
    worth it.
    
    Dave
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
180.23 Can't see why everyone doesn't go Diesel for greenness! SUBURB::POWELLMNostalgia isn't what it used to be!Fri Jul 31 1992 15:1119
    
    	All Diesel fuel is completely free of lead, unlike "lead-free"
    petrol which still has minute traces of lead added because they still
    haven't found a way of eliminating "pinking" without any lead.
    
    	Diesel cars also produce less "greenhouse gases" - Carbon Dioxide,
    something like 30% less than the equivilent petrol engined car, due to
    their increased fuel efficiency.
    
    	Not only this, adding a Turbocharger to a Diesel engine doesn't
    have the huge fuel consumption penalty that it does when added to a
    petrol engined car.  It does have some small penalty (on the Diesel)
    like on my BX 1.9 litre straight Diesel did an overall of 44 MPG and my
    current BX 1.7 litre Turbo Diesel returns an overall of about 42 MPG. 
    I guess that comparing it to the BX 1.7 litre straight Diesel would be
    more valid though and I don't have any experience of that.  I can't see
    that the difference would be into a double figure percentage though.
    
    				Malcolm.
180.24KERNEL::SHELLEYRDiet free Caffeine CokeFri Jul 31 1992 15:2620
    Malcolm,
    
    I will be condisering a diesel as my next car because of the high
    annual mileage I do.
    
    The thing that puts me off though are 
    
    i) Lack of performance
    ii) Noisy
    iii) I've heard its messy to fill up and subject to freezing.
         I know a guy who has a BX diesel who was almost stranded last
         winter because the diesel pumps had frozen up and couldn't put any
         fuel in.
    iiii) I'd also be concerned that the fuel may freeze in the car during
          very low temperature.
    
    I'd like your comments
    
    Roy
    
180.25NEWOA::SAXBYBorn again reincarnationistFri Jul 31 1992 15:3120
    
    Well I'm not Malcolm and I don't own a diesel but,...
    
    i) Lack of performance - As Malcolm said some Turbo Diesels perform
    quite adequately.
    
    ii) Noisy - Probably only true at start up on modern diesel engines.
    
    iii) Messy - More often due to where many garages site the diesel pump.
         Find a garage where the diesel pump is with the petrol pumps and
         you should be ok. Freezing? Well I can happen, but how often is it 
         THAT cold in the UK?
    
    Does Unleaded REALLY have lead added? Wouldn't that knacker a catalytic 
    convertor? And FINALLY (Esther) a turbo does NOT have a dramatic effect 
    on fuel consumption on a petrol car anymore than on a diesel, it's just
    the kind of car turbos usually get fitted to. You can't compare a 1.4
    Renault 5 with a Turbo 5GTT!!!!
    
    Mark
180.26MAJORS::ALFORDlying Shipwrecked and comatose...Fri Jul 31 1992 15:324
Diesels still pour out oily exhaust which coats everything that gets too close, 
the exhaust is still full of chemicals which some of us react badly to, asthma 
etc.
180.27ULYSSE::CHEVAUXPatrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584Fri Jul 31 1992 15:485
    It is true that most diesel engines have better combustion than petrol
    engines and they produce less "greenhouse" CO components. This is due
    to the high compression ration used. Modern 16-valve high compression  
    petrol engines are becoming quite good too.
    
180.28PEKING::NAGLEJFri Jul 31 1992 17:5111
    
    One of the best cars I've ever had was a Pug 309 diesel.
    Once you were buzzing along you couldn't really tell the
    difference between that and a petrol engines car and 70
    or 80 mph was never a problem. I remember it was quite quick
    of the mark as well and saved me a fortune on running costs.
    
    I think that most top petrol garages have an additive in
    the diesel to reduce the risk of it freezing up in your tank.
    
    JN.
180.29Deisel performance.COMICS::WEGGFifty three Rosalea Avenue, DaventryFri Jul 31 1992 18:549
    	Earlier this week I swapped my Pug 205 1.6 GTi for a 
        205 Deisel Turbo. The performance of the deisel was
        quite staggering - a bit slower off the mark, but once
    	the turbo cut in it could really fly.
    
    	In addition, with the windows shut it was actually noticably
        quieter than the GTi.  A heavy car to drive, though.
    
    	Ian.
180.30if mileage > 15K, get diesel.HEWIE::RUSSELLHAL -> IBM; VMS -> Windows/NTTue Aug 04 1992 13:5043
180.3135 mpg really the best petrol could do?NEWOA::SAXBYBorn again reincarnationistTue Aug 04 1992 13:5610
180.32KERNEL::SHELLEYRDiet free Caffeine CokeTue Aug 04 1992 14:0711
180.33Cruising at high speeds + town driving?HEWIE::RUSSELLHAL -> IBM; VMS -> Windows/NTTue Aug 04 1992 14:1311
I don't seem to do any "economical" motoring; it's either round town, or
at "good" motorway cruising speeds - I'm going on the published economy
figures, whch show the BX TZD Turbo to be at least 10+ mpg better than the
BX 19 petrol. I did get 60+ mpg a couple of times, but that was during running
in. 

For comparison, if I use my wifes Astra 1.3 for the same kind of driving,
I only get in the region of 30mpg or so. But I don't want to get into an
"apples and pears" comparison.

Peter.
180.34MAJORS::ALFORDlying Shipwrecked and comatose...Tue Aug 04 1992 14:177
180.35SBPUS4::MarkTue Aug 04 1992 14:196
180.36All fuels contain some leadJANUS::BARKERJeremy Barker - CBN - Reading, UKTue Aug 04 1992 15:3116
Re: a few back

Unleaded petrol *and* diesel fuel both contain very small quantities of
lead.  These are of natural origin and are *not* added.  Similarly, they
both contain traces of other elements such as uranium.  The quantities
involved are extremely small and certainly less than would have any
measurable effect on a catalytic element.  It is uneconomic to process the 
fuel to remove these contaminants.

Note that diesel exhaust contains known carcinogenic compounds (polycyclic 
hydrocarbons) and often contains significant amounts of soot.  These can 
both be much reduced by appropriate catalytic and filter processing of the
exhaust gases.  A diesel engine can in this way have lower emissions that a 
petrol engine.

jb
180.37Noisy? well...HEWIE::RUSSELLHAL -> IBM; VMS -> Windows/NTTue Aug 04 1992 16:1812
re .35;

Taxi noisy? yes if the taxi has a "modern" diesel engine, not if it has the
old Ford Sierra (nee Pueguot)....

Seriously, they are noticeably noisier than petrol engines at startup and
tickover - once on the move the noise becomes similar.

Mark, come and listen to mine and see what you think. Most diesel cars have
better sound insulation to keep the noise out of the cabin.

Peter.
180.38VANGA::KERRELLDave Kerrell @REO 830-2279Tue Aug 04 1992 17:283
180.39Guzzlers!BRUMMY::HOLTS::richardYour robot sounds like Pink FloydTue Aug 04 1992 18:198
I get 26mpg from my Senator and it costs me an average of 37.00 to fill up!

Can anybody better that...?

This must be a challenge to Jaguar owners everywhere ;-)

_Richard
180.40Meaningful comparisons...CMBOOT::DELANYSTue Aug 04 1992 19:4336
180.412.0iVANGA::KERRELLDave Kerrell @REO 830-2279Tue Aug 04 1992 21:126
re.40:

OK, I get 40mpg out of my Cavalier driving about 60% open road and 40% in heavy
traffic conditions. 90% open road would give me about 45mpg.

Dave.
180.42NEWOA::SAXBYBorn again reincarnationistTue Aug 04 1992 21:1811
    
    Well since we're in the mood for MPG/Condition comparisons.
    
    I get 37ish MPG from my Calibra in 75% congested A-road, 10% stop start
    and 15% M-Way cruising during a typical week.
    
    I didn't bother monitoring my MPG to Austria last winter - I didn't
    like to think about the MPG figures that go with consistent 120 MPH
    cruising!
    
    Mark
180.43Another tale of sorrow.ARRODS::BARRONDSnoopy Vs the Red_BarronTue Aug 04 1992 21:3910
180.44my 2p worthKERNEL::PETTETNorm Pettet CSC BasingstokeTue Aug 04 1992 22:3310
    For the record I own 2 diesels:
    
    	Peugeot 405 GRDT	50+/gall
    	Peugeot 205 XLD		60/gall
    
    	Fuel consumption is a mixture of stop/start and cruise.
    
    Nuff said,
    
    Norm
180.45For more info on diesel engined cars...JANUS::BARKERJeremy Barker - CBN - Reading, UKTue Aug 11 1992 16:564
For those interested in diesel engined vehicles there's a very good piece in
today's (11 August) Independent.

jb