T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
18.1 | Pro Bowl Selections | PTOMV6::JACOB | Steelers pray for wildcard in '89 | Wed Dec 20 1989 18:27 | 6 |
| Rod Woodson and Tunch Ilkin were named to the AFC Pro Bowl team
today. First time the Steelers have had 2 players named in 4 years.
JaKe
|
18.2 | Comment on 1989 season | PTOMV6::JACOB | Steelers pray for wildcard in '89 | Wed Dec 20 1989 19:04 | 73 |
| <<< ASABET::ASAB11:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Sports has moved see note 361.0 >-
================================================================================
Note 226.57 Official '89-90 Steelers Note 57 of 126
PTOMV6::JACOB "A plotcher, hard luck your Lordship" 23 lines 19-SEP-1989 11:53
-< Steelers rusting fast >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> re.56
> The team may just be going from bad to worse.
> I've followed the Steelers since the early '60's when I was a kid
> and have stuck with them thruogh thick and thin. The Super Bowl
> years sort of clouded the memories of those horrible teams that
> the fielded until the big turn around. In the early '80's when
> they were starting to fall apart, I used to get really worked up
> over the games and when they'd lose, it would spoil my whole weekend.
> Now, I just sit back with a six-pack or two and the remote control
> and laugh. The team, which some polls picked to finish 3rd in the
> AFC Central, may win two or three games, or like the past two years,
> when they are 0-12, or 1-11 they'll launch a 4 or five game winning
> streak and give us hopes for next year. Until they get an offensive
> line and a defensive line, they will be the laughing stock of the
> NFL.
> I'm beginning to know how the Green Bay fans have felt for so many
> years. From Champs to Bums and no hope in site.
> JaKe
Looking back on when I wrote that reply, I didn't think that the
Steelers could win 5 games this year. Now, with only one week left
in the season, the Steelers could finish 9-7 if they beat Tampa
on Sunday.
They could also do something else this year that I would have bet
BIG money against after week 2, and that is make the playoffs if
they beat the Bucs, and a couple of other teams cooperate and lose.
I'm not counting on seeing the Steelers in the wild-card game but
it sure would be nice.
Chuck Noll, whose head I was calling for after 2 weeks, brought
the team along very quickly this year, with 10 rookies and over
half the roster has under 3 yrs experience.
After dropping their first 2 games by a 92-10 margin, the Steelers
have only given up an average of 16.6 points a game. Rod Rust,
defensive coordinator attributes this to the defense becoming more
comfortable with the new defense he installed this year in his first
year with the team. The team leads the AFC in takeaways-giveaway
ratio.
The offense still seems to sputter, but in his last 3 games, Tim
Worley has shown some potential at running back, getting over 300
yds in that time period.
Bubby Brister, in his second year as starting QB, hasn't thrown
too many interceptions, but also hasn't thrown many TD's. he is
showing signs of becoming more adept at reading defenses and adapting
based on what he sees.
The Steelers have won 3 of their last 4 and even if they don't make
the playoffs, 8-8 or 9-7 is a welcome change from the 5-11 season
they had last year.
LOOKOUT FOR THE STEELERS IN THE 1990 SEASON, THOUGH.
Steelers in Super Bowl in 1991.
JaKe
|
18.3 | Chuck Noll in top 3 coaches of the year | PTOMV6::JACOB | Steelers GET wildcard in '89 | Tue Dec 26 1989 11:08 | 31 |
| Well, I have to admit that even I would have bet big money against
the Steelers making the playoffs this year, BUT, they got some help
this weekend and now get to go to the House of Braindead (morons)
and play the Houscum Oilslicks next Sunday in the AFC wildcard game.
The Steelers will be sending out "Thank You" notes to the Giants
for their victory over the Faiders, the Saints, for their victory
over the Colts, and to the Vikings for their victory over the Bungles.
As for the 2 losses to the Oilslicks this year, they lost 27-0 in
the "House", but that was with Todd "bounce pass" Blackledge at
QB. They lost 23-16 in Pittsburgh in week 12 in a snowy game but
they should have won that game. The Oilslicks got a gift from the
officials of a 4th time out in the first half, and with that help
they scored a TD that otherwise wouldn't have been. Also, in their
game winning drive, the Oilslicks got another gift from the officials
by getting a favorable call on a reception where the receiver was
clearly out of bounds but the replay official wouldn't overturn
it.
The Steeler team that the Oilslicks will face Sunday is a team that
after the first 2 games where they lost by a combined score of 92-10
went 9-5, including winning 5 of their last 6. The defense has
been extremely tough over the last half of the season, so it looks
like it will be a good game.
Win or lose, the Steelers had a good year, considering their 5-11
record last year, and their near disastrous start this year.
JaKe
|
18.4 | It won't even be close... | RIGEL4::JBONNO | | Tue Dec 26 1989 11:14 | 7 |
| Prediction:
Oilers 31
Steelers 3
At the end of the first half!
jab
|
18.5 | Yeah, right | SUPVAX::KERMIT | Steelers GET wildcard in '89 | Tue Dec 26 1989 13:17 | 8 |
| re-.1
You got the teams mixed up there.
I predict a close defensive game which could go either way.
JaKe
|
18.6 | Tie on your Hardhat | OASS::R_QUINN | Steeler's on the Rise | Tue Dec 26 1989 14:15 | 9 |
| Steelers 24
Oilers 14
Oilers have lost their heart and it's hard to beat the same team three
times in a single season. It will be even tougher after the last one
was a gift and you've gone into a two game nose dive to end the season.
Louie Lipps for two touchdowns.
Roy Q.
|
18.7 | The Vikings Gave The Steelers a X-Mas Present... | REGENT::WEMETT | | Tue Dec 26 1989 15:50 | 2 |
|
|
18.8 | On a roll | PNO::HERKO | | Tue Dec 26 1989 15:51 | 4 |
| Steelers 31
Oilers 24
They are on a roll!
|
18.9 | Louis Lipps Sinks Ships | 39131::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Tue Dec 26 1989 15:59 | 2 |
|
|
18.10 | | RIGEL4::JBONNO | | Tue Dec 26 1989 16:14 | 16 |
| How can anyone say the Steelers are on a roll? Sure, they have won
five out of six. Lets analyze their schedule, shall we?
The Steelers beat Tampa Bay, New England, NY Jets, Miami, and San Diego
during their "awesome" comeback. Doesn't look like any of these teams
have a winning record, except for a .500 Dolphin team. Oh, and that
one loss was to Houston, a team with a winning record.
I guess it really doesn't matter, since the BROWNS will be there in the
end. Just thought I would try to clear up any hallucinations you folks
might be having.
Have a nice day. 8^)
jab
|
18.11 | Brown(spot)s SSSSSSSUUUUUUCCCCCCKKKKKK | SUPVAX::KERMIT | Steelers GET wildcard in '89 | Tue Dec 26 1989 16:26 | 1 |
|
|
18.12 | And a happy New Year to you too, JaKe! 8^) | RIGEL4::JBONNO | | Tue Dec 26 1989 16:31 | 1 |
|
|
18.13 | ALL the FACTS | CSOA1::SCHRAMM | Born Free!....My Dad was a Doctor. | Wed Dec 27 1989 10:30 | 14 |
| re .10
yo JAB if we are going to analyze Pittsburgh's schedule lets look
at ALL the wins....
hm.. lets see
oh they beat Minnesota, KC, Cleveland (boy dont these teams sound
like Oiler losses?) and Detroit (who had a good finish)
look at the whole picture JAB. that one sided note (.10) you put in makes
me want to puke
|
18.14 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | There IS a Santa, Walton is out | Wed Dec 27 1989 11:32 | 6 |
| I predict a PittsburgH victory in the 'dome.
Houston has nothing left...I heard they're talking to Joe Walton about
becoming the new offensive coordinator...CONGRATS.
ha ha
|
18.15 | Bubby for MVP | CNTROL::CHILDS | Jihad confirms, Mathis gets bonus | Wed Dec 27 1989 11:58 | 12 |
|
As long as Bubby is healthy and stays in control the Steelers can beat
any team in the AFC playoffs. Worley has develop nice and along with
Hodge is giving the offense balance. Defense has progress nicely also.
As long as they don't get into the mind games with the oilers, they'll
be all set because Oilers will take the big penalities....
20-14 Steelers, then on to Pile it High where the slumping Donks are
ripe for the pickings....
mike
|
18.16 | Great season for the Steeler's!! | SPMFG1::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Dec 27 1989 14:00 | 21 |
|
Well, way back at the start of the season, I predicted that
the Steeler's would be lucky to win 3 games with this group of
stooge's. Once again though, they proved me as well as a lot of
other people wrong with a great turnaround. Give credit where it
is due, and a lot of credit should be given to Noll. When the masses
were demanding his head, he kept his head and got this group to
mesh into a better team.
Now, I'll be the first to admit that the Steeler's aren't going
to set the playoffs on fire (I still think they are a "Few Bricks
Shy of the Load"), but at least they got there. I don't care how
they did it, they won when they had to and even if they didn't make
it, the season could still be labeled as a success.
It's amazing that in Noll's entire coaching career, that he
has never won Coach of the Year. I know there were some great coaching
jobs done this year, but Noll has got to get some credit sometime!!
One for the thumb!! bill..g.
|
18.17 | Thanks, Wardle | PFSVAX::JACOB | Steelers GET wildcard in '89 | Wed Dec 27 1989 15:11 | 10 |
| Re .14
Oh SH*T, the "Wardle kiss of death". Thanks alot. The Steelers have
it tough enough without the "JINX".
:-)
JaKe
|
18.18 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Dec 28 1989 18:59 | 3 |
| Get `em JoJ, Give `em the KoD
Big Game
|
18.19 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Thu Dec 28 1989 19:25 | 2 |
| Just be thankful that Dinz didn't pick the Steelers (or did he?). That
would be the REAL kiss of death.
|
18.20 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | Joe knows noses | Thu Dec 28 1989 19:27 | 3 |
| C'mon JaKe, even spelled PittsburgH with an "H"....
JoJ
|
18.21 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Dec 28 1989 20:07 | 5 |
| You guys are in deep doo doo...... The Infamous Waddle just
jumped your band wagon...... The Steelers are HISTORY !!!
Big Game
|
18.22 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Mcfall=francessa , true sport wizards | Fri Dec 29 1989 09:44 | 2 |
| STEELERS OVER OILERS
|
18.23 | You Owe Me, DiNz ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Dec 29 1989 11:58 | 5 |
18.24 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Mcfall=francessa , true sport wizards | Fri Dec 29 1989 14:08 | 4 |
| ALLSET JACK... WILL BE DONE THIS WEEKEND
DINZ
|
18.25 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Dec 29 1989 14:24 | 3 |
| Sounds good, Send me mail when the mission is driven to completion.
Big Game
|
18.26 | | GENRAL::WADE | You can't always get what you want | Fri Dec 29 1989 14:53 | 5 |
|
I know what it iiiiiiiis! 'Bout friggin' time this
charade(sp?) was over!
Claybone
|
18.27 | Hold your tounge | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Dec 29 1989 15:03 | 8 |
| Listen Claybone_head,
You just keep quiet for a few more days. I'd hate to have to
come down and have a heart to heart chat with you about letting
the cat out. Yea, Thats right, I'm talking to you !
Big Game
|
18.28 | | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Fri Dec 29 1989 15:17 | 3 |
|
remember when this note was used to talk about the Steelers???
|
18.29 | Sorry, back to the topic at hand ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Dec 29 1989 15:27 | 11 |
| Sorry,
I guess I was the one that sent it down the "Rat Hole".
I really think that Noll (sp?) should have gotten COTY,
he brought a sorry club up to `offs caliber in one year.
Bubby Brister could be a hell of alot better if the
Steelers "Only Had A Line"
Big Game
|
18.30 | | GENRAL::WADE | You can't always get what you want | Fri Dec 29 1989 16:42 | 5 |
| You're damn right you'd "hate it". You wouldn't even survive
it you little girly-mon! Sorry Steeler fans. I just couldn't
let Cacti slide......
Claybone
|
18.31 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Dec 29 1989 16:52 | 9 |
| Survive it !! Hell, after I was done with you Manino would have
to spend the rest of the day putting you back together.
Clay_Bone_Head, I don't think you know just exactly who you're
dealing with!
Many ;^)
Big Game HAPPY NEW YEAR !
|
18.32 | The House of Cards | BAUCIS::SAPP | | Mon Jan 01 1990 11:38 | 6 |
| Congratulation to the Steelers...they really took it to the
Oilers. I guess JoJ does not have have the Kiss-of-Death after all.
Ship Glandville(sp) off to the Atlanta Falcons they deserve each
other.
Edwin
|
18.33 | Hey Biff, How's your golf game | PFSVAX::JACOB | Steelers GET wildcard in '89 | Tue Jan 02 1990 11:06 | 14 |
| ********** N E W S F L A S H **********
Steelers survive Wardle "KISS OF DEATH". Oilslicks now concentrating
on their golf games. Oilslicks pull Brown(spot)s(tm) trick and choke
on the big one.
"Biff" Elway and the jackasses to face the real Steelers Sunday.
Take the Steelers and the points straight to the bank.
GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!
JaKe
|
18.34 | drop the Donks in Pile It High | CNTROL::CHILDS | Holtz runs up 25K phone bill with ABC | Tue Jan 02 1990 11:25 | 19 |
|
It was nice to finally be able to watch the Steelers this year. I had
forgotten how conservative Noll is. I kept waiting for him to go deep
but then remembered the 70's and knew that he wasn't going deep until
he had to. Worley and Hoge make a nice pair and keep the pressure off
of Bubby.
This sunday will be interesting. If they keep Elway in the pocket he'll
make his mistakes. I'd like to see them blitz a little more cause the
pass rush wasn't to good. Moon completed a lot of passes but Elway
isn't as good as Moon so maybe they can just play it straight and get
the job done...
and wasn't it nice to hear Bubby speak after a game. "Hell I'm happier
than Shit" or something to that effect on national TV. Nice to hear a
guy talk like a regular Joe instead of giving us spoon fed PR
garbage...
mike
|
18.35 | He's a time bomb | BUILD::MORGAN | | Tue Jan 02 1990 11:54 | 6 |
| This was the first game I've watched the Steelers from start to finish.
I was impressed, but I'd say the Bubster has to learn to control himself.
Did I see him flip the ref the finger while walking off the field? He
was already real close to getting tossed.
Steve
|
18.36 | | HEURIS::METZGER | Still NOTY for 3 more days | Tue Jan 02 1990 11:55 | 24 |
| If Brister could throw a pass greater than 20 yards with any accuracy the
Steelers wouldn't have had to go to OT. Several times he had men wide open
down field and couldn't connect.
I'd say that Pittsburgh should draft a top linebacker with their first round
choice this year. Their linebackers looked extremely slow covering the pass.
they had no pass rush even with 4 men coming at all times. If they could pick
up an impact LIne backer that couuld rush the passer and cover they could create
havoc nexted year.
I think Earnest Givins cought all 11 passes running the exact same play. Line up
inside the 2 wide outs. Run all the way across the field at different depths and
then wait for moon to throw it after he outran the coverage. I couldn't believe
they weren't chucking him at the line or doing anything to stop his route.
I'd love to see Pittsburgh beat denver but I don't see it happening. Denver will
stuff the run and Bubby had better play better for his mother than this week.
BTW - Has glanville been fired yet ? Sooo much talent, Sooo little to show for
it.
Metz
|
18.37 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | Joe knows noses | Tue Jan 02 1990 12:40 | 9 |
| Hey Jake....I told ya the Steelers would beat the Glanvilles...
Yo! Doc 12am....Glanville is the new official Joe Walton of the NFL.
Yep...take lots of talent and go nowhere with it. Glanville truly
Walton'd it.
JoJ
|
18.38 | Time for a Curtain Call!! | SPMFG1::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Jan 02 1990 12:41 | 34 |
|
To say that I am surprised at the Steeler's showing on Sunday
is an understatement! It was the first time this year (with the
exception of pre-season) that I have been able to sit down and watch
them. Nothing really surprised me about certain aspects of the
their play though. Run the ball 2 times then on 3rd and long, pass.
The offense did a good enough job, even a little better than I
expected, but the defense was the key once again.
Talk about bending and not breaking...The oilers blew a bunch of
chances when they couldn't punch it in from inside the 20. Same
old Steeler's. Give up everything between the 20's, then stuff
the run inside the 20 and give up the 3. I liked the defense from
that standpoint, but what bothers me is that once again, there was
little or no pressure on Moon. Adding to that was the fact that
they gave up the short route too much and were literally picked
apart. One can only wonder how much Merriweather would of helped
this team had he been there. Losing Hinkle also hurt. I don't think
Brister had a very good game because he is a better passer then he
showed on Sunday.
As for next week..Steeler's are on a Fairy Tale ride and as
we all know, ANYTHING can happen in the playoffs. This team is
awfully young which is both bad and good at times. Right now,
their youth is refreshing in that they have nothing to lose, they
can just go out and have some fun. I just hope they play well against
Denver and don't give the game away on turnovers. Win or lose,
it's been a very good year for the Steeler's.
time to bring out the ole "terrible towel"!!
bill..g.
|
18.39 | One game judgements are not always right | CNTROL::CHILDS | Holtz runs up 25K phone bill with ABC | Tue Jan 02 1990 13:18 | 14 |
|
Bubby has a fine long arm, he just missed on a few of those. Take a
look during the year and see how many bombs he connected on. I think
the problem sunday was as stated that they worked out indoors on a
small surface and didn't have the room to work on the long plays.
We'll see sunday in Pile It High....
Does anyone else in the AFC deserve it more than the Steelers?
not from where I sit....
mike
|
18.40 | One for the Thumb ??? | CRONIC::BOYD | | Tue Jan 02 1990 13:46 | 19 |
|
As a Die Hard Steeler fan I have to say that it was great watching them
beat Houston. I didn't have a whole lot of faith in them, but they
pulled it out and recovered nicely from the mistakes. I will have to
agree with the concensus that they need a better pass rush than they
have. The defensive line gave Moon little to no pressure and looked
pretty slow getting off the ball. I like Brister as a QB. He is young
and energetic and knows how to get his team fired up. He has a problem
connecting with the deep pass, but the receivers also dropped some easy
passes that they should have caught. Noll has shown that he can still
coach in this league, but his conservative play calling will be the
downfall of this team.
Well here's to hoping that they give the Bronc's a ride for their
money...
Jim B.
|
18.41 | STEELERS GET LUCKY... | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | | Tue Jan 02 1990 14:50 | 10 |
|
WHAT A SLOPPY GAME!!!
Don't expect too much out of them next week!
The donks get lucky...and have to play the mumbleing, bungling
sludge from Erie....Buster is NO GOOD! What a kid!
ARF ARF ARF
|
18.42 | Wild card game = sloppy,bad refs and play!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Tue Jan 02 1990 15:00 | 11 |
| The stellers will lose to Broncs with the pittiful pass rush that
they have. Also their running game isn't that great, even knowing
that it is better than last year.
I don't think the stellers has what it takes to beat the best team in
the afc.
Broncs 27 Stellers 10
Tj
|
18.43 | Donks 1, Steelers 0 | SNDCSL::HAUSRATH | Who,Stones in '89. Zep in '90 | Tue Jan 02 1990 15:04 | 6 |
|
re: -1..
Over the last five games the Steelers are the "best team in the AFC".
/Jeff
|
18.44 | give me a break! | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | | Tue Jan 02 1990 15:10 | 7 |
|
over the last two games...
THE CLEVELAND BROWNS ARE THE BEST TEAM IN THE NFL!!!
ARF ARF ARF
|
18.45 | | BSS::RIGGEN | Denver's D goes to S.B. offense is gone | Tue Jan 02 1990 15:13 | 11 |
| Pittsburgh has played ;
Miami
Houston
Jests
Patsies
Tampa Bay
5-1 is really impressive against that tough schedule. Only Miami had a
chance at the playoffs in that group of losers.
|
18.46 | | TACKLE::STROUT | knocking on heaven's door... | Tue Jan 02 1990 15:28 | 15 |
|
the steelers had the best record for the last 5 games in the
afc but they also had the easiet.
you want to talk about tough schedules. check out dallas's
last five:
phil (11-5)
rams (11-5)
at phil
giants (12-4)
green bay (10-6)
ouch!
sean
|
18.47 | back at ya.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Holtz runs up 25K phone bill with ABC | Tue Jan 02 1990 15:39 | 13 |
|
that a boy Riggens spoken like a true donko fan....
and back when the donko's were 5-1 it was against top notch
competition too
Kansas City handed the game on turnovers
Buffalo biggest head cases around
Raiders we all know what you guys think of the Raiders
Browns a loss (let the crying start)
San Diego great d no o
mike
|
18.48 | | BSS::RIGGEN | Co Sports teams= Bridesmaids | Tue Jan 02 1990 15:51 | 7 |
| Thanks for the Input Mike'e
4-5 of those teams were in the Hunt for a Playoff birth and 2 of them
won their division.
|
18.49 | | TACKLE::STROUT | knocking on heaven's door... | Tue Jan 02 1990 15:54 | 5 |
|
i count 2-5 (houston, miami) in the hunt and none of the 5 won
their division!
sean
|
18.50 | the reality. the reality is also 1-3 the last four weeks | CNTROL::CHILDS | Holtz runs up 25K phone bill with ABC | Tue Jan 02 1990 15:57 | 5 |
|
it's easy to be in the playoff hunt when 1 game above 500 gets you
in.......
mike
|
18.51 | | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Tue Jan 02 1990 18:22 | 13 |
|
re a few back
look at the entire Steeler schedule ... not the last 5 games.. they
beat some good teams this year (not many)......
on Pittsburgh running game.....
Worley is starting to turn it out. Cleveland thinks they have a
running game now because crack mack is back. thatmains to be seen.
win or lose in Denver it was a great season for Pittsburgh
|
18.52 | Steelers ONE more time | OASS::R_QUINN | Steeler's on the Rise | Tue Jan 02 1990 19:57 | 12 |
| I know the view looks dim but I wouldn't just count the steelers out
just yet. The broncos are certainly favored (-8) but they haven't
looked the greatest over the last 4 weeks. The steeler team has
improved by leaps and bounds since thier last meeting(broncs 34-7).
The steelers played ok against the oilers but far from a great game
for them. They didn't get the kick return game going, very little
Louie Lipps, and Bubby appeared to be a bit frazzled without need
inside the 30. The steelers should be loose going into Denver if they
take advantage of scoring opportunities they could definitely beat the
broncs. Of course winning anything now is icing on the cake.
Roy Q.
|
18.53 | Squealers + Playoff Spot = Lady Luck ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Jan 04 1990 01:03 | 3 |
| Donks CRUSH Squealers........... Film at 11:00.......
Big Game
|
18.54 | Take Pgh + points for a sure winner | PFSVAX::JACOB | Steelers to crush Donks in '90 | Thu Jan 04 1990 10:48 | 7 |
| Elway will be able to eat corn on the cob thru a picket fence after
the Steeler defense gets thru with him. Ole "Biff" will leave after
the first quarter with "bruised teeth".
JaKe
|
18.55 | Elway + Denver "D" = Superbowl Victory ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Jan 04 1990 11:36 | 6 |
| "Old Biff" May leave the game but it gonna be because
the Broncos are so far out in front and don't want to
embarrass the lowly SQUEALERS !!
Big Game
|
18.56 | steelers easy | CNTROL::CHILDS | In Bubby we Trust | Thu Jan 04 1990 11:40 | 7 |
|
ah Big Game, I hear he's already having menstral cramping and is
doubtful for sunday.......
;^)
you know who
|
18.57 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Jan 04 1990 11:48 | 5 |
| Guess again Mikey !! Elway will Dominate this game
as he has in all of his other Playoff game. Look for
a huge Bronco Win....
Big Game
|
18.58 | Elway will cry in his Shirley Temple | PFSVAX::JACOB | Steelers to crush Donks in '90 | Thu Jan 04 1990 12:04 | 25 |
| I read in the paper yesterday that of the 46 teams that have played in
the Super Bowl, only 3 had a losing record in their last 5 games.
50%of the teams that made it finished 4-1.
of the 4 teams in the AFC, here's how they finished:
Denver Jackasses 2-3
Clevescum Brown(spot)s 2-3
Baffalo Billieboys 1-4
STEELERS 4-1
The Steelers may not have beaten any powerhouses in the last 5, BUT
they won the games they should have. They are on a roll and Sunday
there won't be a repeat of the 34-7 drubbing they suffered a couple
months ago. Noll and the rest of the team will show up with a game
plan that will suprize the Jackasses and the game will be a close one,
maybe even be decided in the final minute.
Win or lose, the Steelers have had a good year, winning 10 of their
last 15 after getting blown out in the first 2 weeks.
Sunday, facing the Donks, is next year's AFC Central division CHAMPS.
JaKe
|
18.59 | Mental case! | LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR | | Thu Jan 04 1990 12:05 | 6 |
|
The steelers will not overcome the OT win in Houston...they will
lose!
ARF! Looking forward to another game against the donks!
|
18.60 | dont think it will be easy | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Thu Jan 04 1990 12:44 | 6 |
|
re -1
dont be so confident on beating the Bills this saturday. depends on
which Cleveland team shows up this week
|
18.61 | Justification...The Trade! | LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR | | Thu Jan 04 1990 13:43 | 6 |
|
Don't worry PTO...THE DAWGS WILL BE THERE! That is all that will
be needed! The pound opened on Tuesday! The Slaughter begins on
Saturday! The Dawg House will be full!
ARF!
|
18.62 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Jan 04 1990 14:38 | 4 |
| Lite Locks.... The Clowns won't make it past the Bill's,
Take it to the bank....
Big Game
|
18.63 | But he's getting his heels shined up. | POGO::REED | Oklahoma State athletic supporter | Thu Jan 04 1990 15:13 | 5 |
| The Clowns can't run on the Bills. Besides they aren't ready to play
since Bernie can't decide on a dress for the game.
Cowboy
|
18.64 | he did, however, decide on crotchless panties | PFSVAX::JACOB | Steelers to crush Donks in '90 | Thu Jan 04 1990 15:19 | 1 |
|
|
18.65 | The curtain is no more!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Thu Jan 04 1990 15:24 | 5 |
| Steelers still suck!!!!! Film is to ugly to show at 11!! Broncos
are the best AFC team of the 80's, and is still the best for the 89-90
season!!
Tj
|
18.66 | Just for you! | LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR | | Thu Jan 04 1990 15:25 | 13 |
|
Thats right JACOB...someone told him you were going to be
there Saturday...
Did you put your lipstick on today???
Bernie said...he likes you better in Red!
HeHeHe
ARF!
|
18.67 | Go back to sleep, litelocks | PFSVAX::JACOB | Steelers to crush Donks in '90 | Thu Jan 04 1990 15:52 | 13 |
| Hey wite(brainless)head:
I don't prefer the equipment that's there. Although, with Bernie and
his playing like a girl, you never know what you'd find.
Your rabid chihauhaus will fall either this week or next, BUT, in the
unlikely occurence they make the Big game, they'll be nothing more than
toilet paper for the NFC team to wipe up with.
JaKe
|
18.68 | It's been a long day...... | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Jan 04 1990 16:02 | 5 |
|
I must be in the Twilight Zone here...could of sworn that I
already read the Bronco's note.
|
18.69 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye." | Thu Jan 04 1990 16:09 | 1 |
| doeseveryonelikethenewwaywekeeppeoplereadingdrivel?
|
18.70 | I do Jeff, it holds my interest longer. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Giants | Thu Jan 04 1990 16:13 | 1 |
|
|
18.71 | The new /Don Hold Your Interest Longer Workout Video! | SASE::SZABO | been TERRIFIED! | Thu Jan 04 1990 16:20 | 1 |
|
|
18.72 | | CAM::WAY | Hyatt Legal Services to defend Noriega | Thu Jan 04 1990 16:48 | 16 |
| I think a lot of noters received instructions on how to insert
form-feed characters in notes, for Christmas...
Personally, I think the Steelers are a Cinderella team if I ever
saw one. I hope they hit Elway so hard that his dentures fly forth
from that ever-widening, ever-sickening maw and impact Iris Chacon's
butt.
Bubby will have a big day, Louis Lipps will sink the broncs ship once
and for all.
You heard it heard first....
Chainsaw
|
18.73 | | SASE::SZABO | Chainsaw's new Kelly = Iris! | Thu Jan 04 1990 16:51 | 2 |
|
|
18.74 | JaKe, you do me proud ! | LUNER::BROOKS | Everybody needs an ocassional push... | Thu Jan 04 1990 17:16 | 7 |
| re .67
"Rabid Chihauhaus" ?
I'm flooooorrrrwaaaaard !
DrM
|
18.75 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Jan 04 1990 18:05 | 3 |
| `Saw, get outta town..
Big Game
|
18.76 | Donk fans afraid to see the massacre!! | OASS::R_QUINN | Steeler's on the Rise | Thu Jan 04 1990 18:11 | 5 |
|
New line Donks favored by 10. It doesn't matter though they'll lose
outright!!!!
IIIIIIII got a feeeeeeeeeelin' Pittsburg's going to the SuperBowl !!!
|
18.77 | Refs win game while bubby lays in pain. | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Thu Jan 04 1990 20:17 | 7 |
| re-.76
You better check your feelings, because Pitt don't stand a chance
this weekend. The only way they will win is if the browns or oilers
show up instead of the Broncos.
Just call me junky
|
18.78 | Alright now, stop that .. | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Jan 04 1990 23:47 | 10 |
| Another "JUNK NOTER" someone call the Kinder&Gentler(tm) police.
Tim, You stop that now, You wouldn't want to offend anyone by
suggesting that their team isn't the greatest thing since the
coming of Christ. Remember, Tim, This is a Kinder&Gentler(tm) topic,
we can't have any fun here..... ;^)
You know, I kinda like this,
Big game
|
18.79 | Steelers will continue to roll | CNTROL::MAINT | | Thu Jan 04 1990 23:59 | 4 |
| Steelers over slumping Broncos. They have only won one game in the last
month.
Steve J.
|
18.80 | I make My self sick.. You too, I bet !1 | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Jan 05 1990 00:09 | 6 |
| Yes, But the Donks were just being Kinder&Gentler(tm) the
last 4 weeks. After all, who other than A Kinder&Gentler
footbal team would allow other team to win so that those
teams could avoid emabrrasment.
Big Game
|
18.81 | A team of destiny | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Giants | Fri Jan 05 1990 10:19 | 33 |
| That long time Steeler fan, Mike Childs has been trying to persuade
me all week to get off the Donks bandwagon, and I think I am starting to see
things in a new light. Now look at the Steelers uniforms, black and gold,
classy colors, manly colors the kind of colors you would expect a football
team to wear. Now look at the Broncos colors, orange and blue. Orange and
blue? Those are the kind of colors you would find in a nursery! Now look
at the names of some of the players. The Steelers have players with names
like Dwight Stone, Tunch Ilkin and Ron Woodson, great football names. I
scan the Broncos roster and see names like Kip Corrington, Randy Robbins and
Simon Fletcher. Jeesh, it sounds like a yuppie law firm.
I started thinking what kind of person would root for the Steelers,
and what kind of person would root for the Broncos. Arnold Schwartzenger
would root for the Steelers. Pee Wee Herman would root for the Broncos.
Kathleen Turner would root for the Steelers. Anita Bryant would root for
the Broncos. The late great Ernest Hemmingway would've rooted for the
Steelers. That former fruit Truman Capote would've rooted for the Broncos.
The guys who order a shot and a beer will be rooting for Pittsburgh. The
guys who order Pina Colatas and other fruity type drinks with plastic
umbrellas will be rooting for Denver.
Look at the respective team's histories. When you think of the
Steelers you think of Bradshaw to Swan, Mean Joe Greene and a long list
of Super Bowl records. When you think of the Broncos you think of Super
Bowl records too. All set by the other team of course. Even when the
Steelers were bad, they were a colorful collection of hard drinking hard
playing free spirits. When you think of the Broncos past you think of those
silly stripes on their uniforms.
Well I'm convinced. The Steelers are America's team. I'm a Bubby
believer! Go Steelers!
/Don
|
18.82 | Rooooolllllward over .81 | PFSVAX::JACOB | Steelers to crush Donks in '90 | Fri Jan 05 1990 10:23 | 7 |
| re.81
I rest my case, the Steelers over the Donks this Sunday, 16-14.
JaKe
|
18.83 | | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Fri Jan 05 1990 10:28 | 1 |
| re.81---- Great Note!!!!
|
18.84 | | JUPITR::PARTEE | Charlie -- Lemieux est le mieux | Fri Jan 05 1990 10:37 | 4 |
| ditto!
Charlie (JNing can be fun when done in moderation!)
|
18.85 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Steelers to crush Donks in '90 | Fri Jan 05 1990 10:42 | 7 |
| I won't be in the office next week. I'm only saying this because if
the Steelers lose Sunday I know someone would accuse me of Dr.
Midnighting next week by being conspicously absent from here.
JaKe
|
18.86 | The new /Don Noting With Hipboots Workout Video! :-) | SASE::SZABO | Butt, Iris! | Fri Jan 05 1990 11:20 | 1 |
|
|
18.87 | | STRATA::GILLIS | Made you look | Fri Jan 05 1990 11:21 | 3 |
|
If Pee Wee's on the Denver bandwagon, then go Donks!
|
18.88 | Goin' back to the Trenches | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Fri Jan 05 1990 11:58 | 14 |
| The stellers will choke on Denvers smog and thin air. It took the
wind out of them earlier this year, and I don't think they learned
their lesson.
I guess I can be one of those K & G people to, but for how long,
I don't know.
The Broncos will be victorious!
Broncs 24 Stellers 10
Tim
|
18.89 | Not A "Junk Note", I swear ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Jan 05 1990 12:06 | 11 |
| Now I Surly don't want to be accused of "Junk Noting"
so I'm not going to even try to rebuff the trash in .81.
It's so nice to live in a facist notes file where one
doesn't feel free to state his opposing opinion.
The one thing that I will say is that that was quite a
creative note with absolutly no FACTUAL(tm) basis. The
Donks will not only beat the Squealers, they will embarrass
them into quiting at the half.
Big Game
|
18.90 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | I'm a Bubby believer! | Fri Jan 05 1990 12:16 | 5 |
| Jack, I tell ya it all FACK. I did the research all week long.
Sorry to see anyone interpreting it as a JN. I wouldn't lie to
a fellow Giants' supporter.
/Don
|
18.91 | The Squealers are no match for the MIGHTY BRONCOS ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Jan 05 1990 12:23 | 9 |
| Well /Don,
There may be *SOME* FACKTUAL(Tm) basis to you verbage in
.81 but just like everyother ANTI-DONK, you have twisted
them to suit your needs. You have obviously be Brain
Washed by the Brain Dead..... Go see your analisyst, you
really need help. ;^)
KG_Big Game
|
18.93 | | SASE::SZABO | Butt, Iris! | Fri Jan 05 1990 12:26 | 10 |
| Last weeks game against the Oilers was the first time I've seen this
Bubby guy, and I wasn't impressed by his constantly way-off-the-mark
passes. And, at least half of them were down right piss-poor, ones
that Doug Flutie would've easily made. Hopefully, that was just a bad
day for him because the rest of the Steelers team ain't that bad.
I'd say that Bubby must hit 60% of his passes if the Steelers are going
to beat the Broncos.......
Hawk
|
18.94 | watch it KGBG, I resemble that remark ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | In Bubby we Trust | Fri Jan 05 1990 12:27 | 1 |
|
|
18.95 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Don't go back to college, stay | Fri Jan 05 1990 12:32 | 11 |
| /Don,
Great, great note. I do admit my cousin is a Bronco fan, and he
don't drink no umbrella drinks, but he's an exception. When I met
those guys Wardle knows out at CXO, they were all drinking Fuzzy
Navels and stuff like that, Monty at least had some good beer, as
did I.
Bubby reminds me of a young Bradshaw.
JD
|
18.96 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | Glanville=polyester_Walton | Fri Jan 05 1990 12:51 | 4 |
| Hey Slasher, you may be a phony Carnac, but you're a convincing
salesman.
Go Steelers...!!!
|
18.97 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Jan 05 1990 12:55 | 23 |
| A few FACKTUAL(tm) points of contention;
1. I am A Broncos fan and I don't drink none of those
Girly Mon Drinks and neither do any of my Buddys of
which Mr. Wardle happens one (right Jim ??) ;^)
2. Monty Wouldn't know good beer if you pored it on him.
3. Bubby Brister will never come close to the Greatness
reached by Bradshaw. I realize he is young and that
given a chance to learn he will of course get much
better than he is now. But..... At this stage of his
career, he has neither the talent, poise or experience
to take his team to the conference championship let alone
the SB. In all seriousness, I think the Broncos will
man handle the Squealers. Denver in a rout.......
KG_BRONCOS 35
JN_SQUEALERS 10
KG_Big Game
|
18.98 | It's the cops! | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Fri Jan 05 1990 13:43 | 40 |
|
Dum - Dum - Daaahh
Dum - Dee - Dum... Dum - Dee - Dum -
The following story is true. The names have been changed to protect
the innocent.
"Friday, January 5th. I was working the JN squad."
"O.k., boys, round up all the JN-ers and bring 'em down to the station.
If they so much as twitch a typing finger, cut off their nodes."
2nd Detective: "Joe? Sargent Joe Friday? Is that you? Why, you
old dog, I haven't seen you since we did that old TV show together.
Say, I'd heard you were permanently assigned to the Broncos note.
What are you doing here?"
"Just flew in this morning. Got a bulletin that there have been
some rampant JN-ing all over the system. Seems to happen this time
every year. Just want to nip it in the bud. And by the way, it's
not 'Sargent Joe Friday' anymore."
"Oh, you got the promotion to captain?"
"Well, not exactly, it's actually Sargent Joe Saturday. It's like
a promotion in name only without the increased salary benefit.
You know how it's been with the hiring freeze, wage freeze and all."
"I hear ya, Joe. But congrats anyway.
"By the way, Joe, I know we have our job to do and I don't want
this to sound hypocritical, but this wouldn't by any chance be
considered a junk note, would it?"
"No problem. We work for the moderators."
[insert canned laughter/smilies here]
-Dick
|
18.99 | | CAM::WAY | I've seen the boys of summer in ruin | Fri Jan 05 1990 13:58 | 5 |
| Dick, I am severely rollward!
re Fuzzy Navels...
I believe it JD... I believe it...
|
18.100 | Special Teams will be the difference | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Fri Jan 05 1990 14:50 | 9 |
|
special teams will win this one for Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh will block a
punt and also have a great return by Woodson either on a kickoff or a
block punt that will take the sail out of Denver (geez...im starting to
sound like Dr M....:^)
Go Pittsburgh!!!!!!
|
18.101 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Uno Mas Loss Donks | Fri Jan 05 1990 14:55 | 10 |
| Most of the Donk fan's I know can't even spell Fuzzy let alone drink
some... And Big Game I do drink good beer, Americas Beer!!!!
The Donks will have their hand's full this weekend and watch ol Collie boy
say a few bad words on the sideline.... Most folk's can read lips and
he is not talking like he's in Sunday school...
Watch for Mr. Ed to be eatin turf!!!
Monty
|
18.102 | USA Today | BSS::RIGGEN | Co Sports teams= Bridesmaids | Fri Jan 05 1990 15:00 | 23 |
| In order for Pittsburgh to win Sunday the Defense has to play a career
game. Denver will not give up on the run the way Houston did. Denver is
very comfortable playing smash ball up the middle all afternoon.
Denver's Defense can stop Worley and Hoge.
Offense;
Denver 7th Pittsburgh 14th
pass,
Denver 11th Pittsburgh 14th
run,
Denver 4th Pittsburgh 9th
Defense;
Denver 2nd Pittsburgh 10th
pass,
Denver 2nd Pittsburgh 10th
run,
Denver 1st Pittsburgh 9th
Jeff
|
18.103 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | In Bubby we Trust | Fri Jan 05 1990 15:18 | 10 |
|
Correction Jeff,
Denver's defense cannot stop Worley and Hodge. They haven't stopped
a running game since they payed off Okoye to sit out a game ;^)...
Monty, don't expect Elway to eat much turf, pitt's presure on QB's
is pretty non-exsistant. look for Elway to throw lots of inties ;^)
mike
|
18.105 | That's HOGE, Mike. | SALEM::DODA | Mass qualifies Noriega for welfare | Fri Jan 05 1990 15:22 | 0 |
18.106 | won't even be a game | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Jan 05 1990 16:36 | 18 |
| Hi all you KG(tm) Squealer fans......
Say what you will about the Denver defense and Mr. Ed.
The only thing that counts is who comes out on top in
the end. I have consulted my crystal ball and I have
seen the future. The Broncos can't lose this game.
The Squealers just don't have the talent to beat the
best team in football which happens to be the Denver
Broncos. I forget who the KG(tm) CLOWN was that said
the broncos haven't stopped a running game since they
payed off KC but he/she must be a mushroom. The Broncos
have the best Defense in the AFC and "Our Man John" always
shines in the playoffs. Look for Elway to take control
of this game early. The Pittsturd Squealers will be
blown out before the half.
KGBGH
|
18.107 | A smart coach would have shown Pitt's 4 WORLD CHAMP throphies | CNTROL::CHILDS | In Bubby we Trust | Fri Jan 05 1990 17:02 | 16 |
|
Because Philadelphia and the Giants ran on them with easy. Many of
the broncos earlier opponents had no running game. And to their
credit many times they got an early lead forcing a team to pass
against them, which leads me to believe their #1 ranking is
deceiving......
doesn't matter if pitt can't run Bubby will just have to have a career
day. You know and I know the broncos are taking this lightly and that
will be their downfall.....
I heard that Reeves broke out the AFC championship throphies the other
day for inspiration...atleast he was smart enough to know they can
reach no higher.......
mike
|
18.108 | Also AFC is a passing conference.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | In Bubby we Trust | Fri Jan 05 1990 17:04 | 1 |
|
|
18.109 | Shouldn't it be, In Bubby we lost?? | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Fri Jan 05 1990 17:33 | 9 |
| re .107
Mike, You better not worry so much about the Broncos beating up your
stellers, you better worry about the Rams beating up those giants.
BTW....Go BRONCOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111
TJ
|
18.110 | enjoy the games if you root for jints, steelers, niners browns | CNTROL::CHILDS | In Bubby we Trust | Fri Jan 05 1990 17:53 | 9 |
|
TJ, I never worry about things I cannot control. Rams are tough no
question but Giants will have made the most of their two weeks off
and take it to the RAms defensively first, then the sputtering offense
will pour it on late to secure the victory.......
Broncos couldn't even beat the Chargers and I should worry about them?
mike
|
18.111 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Jan 05 1990 18:12 | 14 |
| (Start Whiney voice)
Why is it that every time the Broncos are reated number 1 in
a catagory it's either a meaningless stat or the ranking is
deceiving or someother BS like that. But let some QB whos
team is 0-15 be ranked number 1 and he is god. I get real
sick of people bashing everything about the Broncos. I can't
remember the last time I saw someone other than a Bronco fan
say something good about the Donks.
(End Whiney Voice) ;^)
KGBGH
|
18.112 | Brister will be all pro in 4 years | PFSVAX::JACOB | I surrender to the JN Police!! | Fri Jan 05 1990 19:04 | 23 |
| Re a few back
When Bradshaw first broke into the starting QB job in Pgh., a lot of
people said he'd never amount to much and he lost his starting job to
Joe Gilliam in the beginning of the year, I think '74, when they won
their first Super Bowl. Brister has all of the tools necessary to be
the second coming of Bradshaw to Pgh. If he can refine them, the
Steelers may be the team to beat in the '90s.
Remember, this is only his second year as a starting QB and he only
started 13 games last year and 13 reg season this year. Bradshaw took
3-4 years before he came into his own and then after that, well, the
rest is history.
Win or lose Sunday, it's been a hell of a year.
As stated earlier, I won't be Dr. 12am'ing next week, I'm gonna be out
of town. (so, there'll be a lull in the JN problem sports wide :-)
JaKe
GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
18.113 | I get to go! | COOKIE::SIMON | | Fri Jan 05 1990 21:21 | 11 |
| Haven't seen so much activity in the Steelers note all year; it was
mostly game reports from JaKe and an occasional nostalgic wish for the
old days from me!
Anyway...I get to see my first Steelers game since 1971 (the year
before they got good) on Sunday (and my first Broncos game, for what
that's worth). Gotta root for the Steelers, even though I'd be happy
if either team was in the Super Bowl.
Steelers 16
Broncos 13
|
18.114 | here you go Jack, nice and not a Bronco fan | LUDWIG::JAMES | | Fri Jan 05 1990 22:38 | 5 |
| The Broncos have the best record in the AFC.
Steve J.
The Steelers will still give them a run for their money.
|
18.115 | | NRADM::KING | No dog after all..... | Sun Jan 07 1990 22:18 | 9 |
| A very good game... Steelers should have said something about BB
not being able to be heard on the last Steeler fumble with 2 minutes
left...
Bronks 24
Steelers 23..
REK
|
18.116 | Aw Sh$t, one lousy point | PFSVAX::JACOB | I surrender to the JN Police!! | Mon Jan 08 1990 10:38 | 20 |
| After being 11 point underdogs at game time, the Steelers gave the
Donks a run for their money. It's a shame the season had to end the
way it started, with a fumble.
The Steelers should be proud of the way they played yesterday
and I'm sure they will be around come playoff time next year.
This is a young team and they are on their way up.
Chuck Noll likened this years draft to the one in the '70's where he
got Swann, Stallworth, Lambert, and others that solidified the team
just before their 4 Super Bowls in years.
I was dissapointed last night but overall, I'm glad they made such a
good showing last night.
JaKe
|
18.117 | ramblings | PFSVAX::JACOB | I surrender to the JN Police!! | Mon Jan 08 1990 10:48 | 18 |
| Sonme stats:
Brister 19-29, 0 interceptions, 1 TD, a couple of dropped passes.
Overall, he played his best game of the year. Was not sacked but
had a fumbled snap on the last Steeler offensive play of the game.
Hoge 120 yds had 100 in first half. Also caught 8 passes for
60+yds
Worley had about 50 yds. Caught a couple of passes.
Offensive line trapped well and gave Brister the time he needed.
WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR, AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH
JaKe
|
18.118 | | SASE::SZABO | Butt, Iris! | Mon Jan 08 1990 11:19 | 8 |
| It's a shame that the best team on the field yesterday had to lose.
Pitt's got a lot to look forward to in the near future- they'll be one
heck of an exciting team!
Just hopefully, they'll keep Bubby's mom in the stands and not on my tv
screen. Enough is enough!
Hawk
|
18.119 | Go PENS!! | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Mon Jan 08 1990 11:33 | 8 |
18.120 | 90's look promising | CNTROL::CHILDS | Broncos&Elway#1inmybook | Mon Jan 08 1990 11:43 | 10 |
|
Great show by the boys what a shame. Imagine what a couple of defensive
lineman cann do for this team? The offense looks set but could use
another burner to go with Lipps. Secondary and the linebackers look
solid too.
Made my day to watch them push that number 1 against the run defense
around like they were high school boys.....
mike
|
18.121 | Give Credit wWhere Credit Is Due | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Mon Jan 08 1990 12:21 | 20 |
| Re: a few back...
The best team on the field didn't lose and they are on their
way to another Superbowl. The Steelers played a hell of a
game against the Broncos but when the chips were down Elway
and his team drove down the field and scored when it counted.
I think alot of credit is due both teams. Pittsburgh deserves
some credit for over-coming all the problems at the begining
of the season and really coming on for the playoffs. The
Broncos deserve credit for being a Superbowl contender and
being able to drive down the field and score when it really counts.
The Steelers could't do that..... I think thats the difference.
Good Game...... The Steelers, The Lions and Packers are all
going to be contenders next year.
GO BRONCOS !!! GO BRONCOS !!! GO BRONCOS !!!
Big Game (yea it was)
|
18.122 | A win is a win!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Mon Jan 08 1990 12:28 | 12 |
| Too bad steelers, but they did play one hellava game. I am sick of
boobies mom. I did like it when they showed her baliing her eyes out
after the fumble. Booby is a spoiled brat (my opinion only), but he
does look like he has alot of good qualities. He will be in his 6th
year next year. He better be all pro then, because I'm tired of
hearing about the potentials of people, aren't you??
Kills the Dawgs!!!!
Tj
|
18.123 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | I'm sent here by the chosen one | Mon Jan 08 1990 12:41 | 4 |
| My hat's off to the Steelers, they gave Denver all they wanted and
more. What a game!! One nit, why didn't they stay with Hoge in the
second half? Denver better wake up this week 'cause the Dawgs is coming
to town.
|
18.124 | | BSS::RIGGEN | Co Sports teams= Bridesmaids | Mon Jan 08 1990 12:45 | 9 |
| Why didn't they stay with Hoge in the Second Half ?
They did credit to Noll for figuring that Denver would adjust to stop
the run and use Hoge as a reciever out of the backfield.
Hoge had 108 yds rushing in the fist half and 0 yds receiving
He finished the game with 120 yds rushing and 60 yds receiving.
Jeff
|
18.125 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go 49ers! | Mon Jan 08 1990 12:54 | 3 |
| Maybe the best team won yesterday, but they sure didn't cover.
/Don
|
18.126 | someone shoot her ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Mon Jan 08 1990 13:11 | 10 |
| Re: Bubby's Mom
I'll tell ya what.... I can't beleive they put that lady
on the screen so much. She get more air time than the coaches
do. If I were Bubby, I would be embarrassed...... the guy is
almost 30, give me a break.
Big Game
GO BRONCOS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
18.127 | One for the thumb in '91... | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Jan 08 1990 14:13 | 31 |
|
re: -1
The guy is almost 30?? How do you figure?? I can understand
how one can figure Elway's age, but Bubby's teeth are human.
re: the game
Well, Cinderella's dance at the ball was cut short, but at least
the shoe fit!
Steeler's lost the battle but I think they won the war. I can
honestly say that I thought the Steeler's played a great game, but
just came up a little short. For the better part of 55 minutes,
the Steeler's were in control and could of won the game. The two
turnovers and the nit-picky 5 yarders were big, but hey, them's
the breaks...not to mention the blocked extra point (that just made
it) and the field goal that hit the upright, but like I said, them's
the breaks.
The Steeler's played their hearts out and you can't ask for
more than that. Bubby played really well as did Hoge and the entire
offensive line.
I'm satisfied with the season after I was talking doom and gloom
after the first two games. They still need a couple of key people,
but the important thing this year, is the fact that they gained valuable
playoff experience and the feeling that they can play with anybody.
Whatever way you look at it, it was a great job done by all,
including Noll!!
bill..g.
|
18.128 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Broncos&Elway#1inmybook | Mon Jan 08 1990 14:15 | 8 |
|
are you Dink fans are just jealous cause they can't put Elway's mom
on the screen. She too busy grazing out in the field and besides the
seats aren't big enough for her....
;^)
mike
|
18.129 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Hell, the fall'll probly kill ya! | Mon Jan 08 1990 15:20 | 19 |
| Did anybody see the post game interviews? The one with Bubby was a riot!!
Reporter: " Well Bubby, what do you think. Did the best team win today? "
Bubby: " What the hell kind of question is that?! What do you expect me to
say?! That we're not good!? That Denver's not good?! We played a good game, and
we're going to be better next year... we've been improving all year. Denver
played a good game, and did what they had to do to win. That was a Bullshit
question! "
I was rollin'.... I hear so many reporters asking inane questions, it was
really refreshing to have an athlete respond like that. The reporter quickly
said ` Well, let's cut back to the studio', and then the talking head said
something about how they had to be careful when they were interviewing live.
What a crock. Night after night the so called `News' shows blood and guts and
violence and up-close-and-personal on every sordid facet of society you can
think of... but let someone say `bullshit' and they wet their pants.
Mike JN
|
18.130 | Clarification on Brister | PFSVAX::JACOB | I surrender to the JN Police!! | Mon Jan 08 1990 15:22 | 9 |
| Re.122
Next year will be Brister's 5th year in the NFL. He will be going into
his 3rd year as the Steelers starting QB, barring any injury.
After suffering thru Cliff Stoudt and Mark Malone, Brister is a
welcome sight.
JaKe
|
18.132 | Proud | PNO::HERKO | | Mon Jan 08 1990 15:39 | 6 |
| The Steelers can be proud of the season they had. I think they
controlled the game, but a couple of costly mistakes gave the
game to Denver in the end. I think Denvers' season will end next
week. (Cleveland and Los Angeles in the Super Bowl)
Jim
|
18.133 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Mon Jan 08 1990 15:44 | 5 |
| Re: Mike JN
Kinda like this notes file.....
Big Game
|
18.134 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Hell, the fall'll probly kill ya! | Mon Jan 08 1990 16:40 | 8 |
| Jack,
Don't be so uptight. It's perfectly alright to say `The Cactus Sucks'
( and everyone does say that *;'D ), as long as you put it on the Community
Bulletin Board, and don't intend it as a personal attack on anyone.
See????
Mike JN
|
18.135 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Broncos&Elway#1inmybook | Mon Jan 08 1990 17:37 | 5 |
|
On ther flip side Steven he also thrown more interceptions than TD's the
last two years just to show both sides of the story...
mike
|
18.137 | equal praise, equal bash for all Steven....;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Broncos&Elway#1inmybook | Mon Jan 08 1990 17:50 | 1 |
|
|
18.138 | Now that the season's over | PFSVAX::JACOB | I can't wait til next year | Mon Jan 08 1990 19:07 | 5 |
| Anyone able to post the 1990 STEELER schedule here??????
JaKe
|
18.139 | Only Kidding Mikey.. You too Moderators ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Mon Jan 08 1990 19:31 | 8 |
| Listen Mike JN,
I think I had about enough of your BS...... You got something to
say to me, Come and say it to my face. You know where I sit you
jerk off. ;^) ;^) ;^) ect...........
Big Game
|
18.140 | Steelers - team of the 1990s | COOKIE::SIMON | | Wed Jan 10 1990 17:03 | 21 |
| (a day late, but I was travelling yesterday)
a great game...and even better, my cousin (a news producer at Channel
9 in Denver) got us great seats. I hated to see Pittsburgh lose, but
you can tell that they'll be back. If their pass defense tightens up a
bit, they can really go places.
As Newsome was punting the last time before the Broncos scored, it
seemed like that was only his second punt of the game; and it was.
Except for two punts and Worley's 1st 1/2 fumble, the Steelers scored
every time they had the ball until Brister's fumble near the end of the
game. Not too bad, but they needed at least one of those field goals
to have been a touchdown, and unfortunately the mass of motion and
procedure penalties hurt them and they had to settle for field goals a
couple of times.
Cleveland and Denver will be a pick-em; both came close to losing, and
neither *should* be able to give S.F. a challenge (but of course, who
knows on game day, and S.F. has to get by the Rams first).
Still...best playoffs all around in several years, in my opinion.
|
18.141 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Wed Jan 10 1990 09:10 | 5 |
| The teams Pittsburgh will play and where were in last week's Sporting
News. I didn't keep it. The actual schedule with dates and times
won't be announced until early to mid April.
John
|
18.142 | Not a win, but not a bad looking loss | OASS::R_QUINN | Steeler's on the Rise | Wed Jan 10 1990 15:52 | 22 |
| The Steelers did look good Sunday even though they are young. Bubby
sort of lost his cool a little bit when Mark Strock dropped the pass on
2nd and 10 that would have given them the first down. The future does
look bright though.
On that topic Knoll has compared this year's draft to that of '74. Who
are the impact players at DL, LB and WR coming out of college. I hear
about all th guys who play for the top 25 teams but any news on others.
I mentioned those three positions because those appear to be the
positions of need according to my assessment.
Also, is Mark Stock one of the guys from the development squad ?
Roy Q.
p.s.
Worely should walk around all off season with a football in his hand so
he can get used to holding onto it. That fumble and the ensuing play
helped turn the tide for Denver in the second half.
|
18.143 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Jan 10 1990 20:14 | 5 |
|
Roy,
According to the RAIDERS scouting staff, DL and LB will be the
strongest positions in this year's draft. Sorry, I don't have any
names handy.
|
18.144 | To hold Steelers fans till next year... | COOKIE::SIMON | | Fri Jan 12 1990 15:31 | 16 |
| For the 2 or 3 other Steelers fans in the conference, FYI...
I just bought a copy of the book "About 3 Bricks Shy...and then the
Load Filled Up." It is an expanded version of Roy Blount's book about
the 1973 Steelers, and I think it was just published (the forward was
written in August, 1989). Even if you read the original, about 1/2 the
book is post-1973 add-on chapters and is pretty interesting. I found
it at a book store in Nashua Wednesday when I was travelling there, so
it should be available elsewhere.
Considering that the 1989 Steelers were also "3 bricks shy of a load"
(in number of playoff games they didn't get), a lot of the similarities
were pretty interesting. Bradshaw in 1973 was very similar to Brister
in 1989; occasionally getting flustered, just emerging as a leader,
etc. All in all, the original book portion is worth reading, as well as the
expanded material.
|
18.145 | 3 Steelers finalists for HOF | COOKIE::SIMON | | Fri Jan 12 1990 15:40 | 5 |
| one more Steelers item...Franco Harris, Jack Lambert, and Lynn Swann
(the latter for the 3rd time) were announced as finalists for the Hall
of Fame balloting. The electees (between 4 and 7) will be announced on
1/27.
|
18.146 | Three Bricks is a great book. I read it years ago | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Denver - The Team of the 90's | Fri Jan 12 1990 16:11 | 1 |
|
|
18.147 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Jan 12 1990 16:41 | 8 |
|
Ditto on the 3 bricks shy book. Brought back a lot of memories!!
As for the Hall of Fame, Franco and Lambert are locks, Lynn
is iffy.
bill..g.
|
18.148 | Swann Iffy | PFSVAX::JACOB | You know where to put the cork.. | Fri Jan 12 1990 16:45 | 7 |
| Swann was eligible last year and didn't make it. The drawback on Swann
is longevity. He was a great player but he didn't play but I think 7
or 8 years. Not logn as far as the great wide receivers go.
JaKe
|
18.149 | kick em while they're down... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Broncos&Elway#1inmybook | Fri Jan 12 1990 17:11 | 7 |
|
yeah but how many times did Swanny catches pass to kick America's
team's butt? That right there should be enough qualification....
;^)
mike
|
18.150 | HOF to Open Steelers-only Section:film@11 | COOKIE::SIMON | | Fri Jan 12 1990 17:40 | 17 |
| Swann missed 2 years ago (when Ham was elected) and last year (Bradshaw
and Blount). I agree he is iffy because of longevity. He did play 9
years, though (1974 through 1982) which should be enough. I thought
that after missing 2 years ago he would have been a lock with Bradshaw
last year (partially cause of the passing duo stuff) and that Blount
wouldn't have been a 1st-year electee. Swann also has on-air face time
as an ABC sportscaster, which doesn't hurt either.
Franco and Lambert should be locks to be elected, though.
A related question...I noticed at the Steelers-Broncos game that most
of the Steelers' greats' numbers are not being used at all (12, 32, 75,
58, 59, etc.) but others are (82, 88, 68, and 78). Have the Steelers
officially retired anyone's number? Are they using Stallworth's,
Swann's, Greenwood's, and White's numbers because there are only so
many numbers in the 60-89 range and they need to use them?
|
18.151 | Another Steeler Fan | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Jan 12 1990 17:41 | 18 |
| How many steeler's from the super bowl years are already in the Hall of
Fame ? I've got: Mean Joe, Terry Bradshaw, Jack Ham and Mel Blount.
Did I miss any ?
Sure locks on entry to the Hall of Fame include Franco Harris and Mike
Webster. Other possibilities include: Lynn Swan, John Stallworth, Jack
Count Dracula Lambert and Donnie Shell. Remote possibilities include: L.C.
Greenwood and Andy Russell. If coaches are eligible, Chuck Noll should
be a lock.
That means the 70 Steeler's will place between 6 and 13 people in the
Hall of Fame. Not bad for a team that was 1-13 when Noll took over.
And not bad for the 1974 draft with one sure lock and 3 good possibilities.
One for the thumb in 1990,
Keith
|
18.152 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Jan 12 1990 17:45 | 5 |
| RE .150
The Steeler's have never retired the number of a great player.
Keith
|
18.153 | Swann Possibilities | WARIOR::R_QUINN | Steeler's on the Rise | Fri Jan 12 1990 18:12 | 13 |
| re .143
Thanks, I guess more information on drafts will be available as
the draft gets closer and it underclassmen declare themselves eligible.
3 bricks sounds like it might be good material. I think I'll try to
pick it up.
Longevity may hurt Swann but it may also hurt him that other steelers
with strong credentials are eligble at the same time. Sort like not
having steeler only party.
Roy
|
18.154 | Coaches can go | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Fri Jan 12 1990 18:56 | 5 |
18.155 | | COOKIE::SIMON | | Fri Jan 12 1990 20:30 | 10 |
| re: .151
your current 4 in the HOF are correct (no one missing), and I agree with
the other
possibilities (though I would consider Lambert a lock, but maybe not
this year given who the other finalists are (Landry, etc.).
For coaches...it must be only 1 season of inactivity to make them
eligible, since Landry was coaching last year. Didn't know that
before.
|
18.156 | Steeler fans coming out of the woodwork | HOGAN::COOLEY | Hope I die before I ACT old | Sat Jan 13 1990 22:28 | 16 |
| I was just wondering if Art Rooney Sr. was in the hall. As a founding
owner, he should be. That would make one more from the greatest team of
all-time.
Also, are any raiders up this year? I just love it when a Steeler and
a raider make the hall the same year, Al Davis introduces the raider,
and all the Steeler fans boo the (*^& out of Davis. Al always has a
smile on his face though. I'll give him that.
I was also wondering how the Pittsburgh fans feel about Franco these
days. Even though his departure (Franco who?) from the Steelers was so
messed up, I hope all is forgiven come hall-of-fame time. He really
seemed to be a great guy, with that one notable exception.
I Loved those steelers, I watch the ESPN dream bowl all the time. And
I hope that Bubby and Co. can make it happen again in the '90s.
|
18.157 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Does Bo know Panflute????? | Tue Jan 16 1990 11:15 | 11 |
| Read in the Pittsburgh paper the other day that the best thing to come
out of a Steelers draft may have been Darryl Sims. Seem that after
drafting Darryl "DUD" Sims and his failure the Steelers totally
revamped their draft strategy.
The paper also said that the biggest hinderance towards the Steelers
looking for an AFC Central championship next year is the hiring of
Jack Pardee by Houston.
JaKe
|
18.158 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN | Wed Jan 17 1990 01:26 | 3 |
|
AFC CENTRAL CHAMPIONS 1980, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1989 = AFC CENTRAL
TEAM OF THE 1980's = CLEVELAND BROWNS!
|
18.159 | Go melt | HOGAN::COOLEY | Hope I die before I ACT old | Wed Jan 17 1990 02:26 | 7 |
| I guess when all that a city can obtain is a few lousy division
titles they grasp for anything they can. All I can say is that
it is pretty pathetic. I'm constantly surprised that the sports fans
of Cleveland haven't all gone and stuck their head in an oven.
Pittsburgh Steelers - greatest team of the 70's, 90's and of all time
(even if SF beats Denver 73-0)
|
18.160 | | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Wed Jan 17 1990 10:10 | 6 |
| re -1
i agree with you 100% on the remarks about the Steelers and
Cleveland. It is a breath of fresh air not seeing ARF! ARF! anymore.
Cleveland can never win the big game
|
18.161 | City traditions | SALEM::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Wed Jan 17 1990 10:15 | 4 |
| DO the Cavaliers still have that '1976 Central Division Champs'
banner across their press table? They had it hanging there for YEARS.
Must be pretty worn by now.
Denny
|
18.162 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN | Wed Jan 17 1990 12:16 | 5 |
| ARF ARF STEELERS SUCK... 3rd place this year... back to the cellar
next year - where they below (the sewer city!)
GO CAVS WHAT A TEAM...!
GO BROWNS!
|
18.163 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Jan 17 1990 15:14 | 34 |
|
re: Hall of Fame
A few back...Lambert should be a lock, period. He made the
pro bowl every year he played which I believe is 8 and was currently
tied this year by Lawrence Taylor. Lambert was considered the best
middle linebacker in the game when he played and that was back in
the days when teams played the 4-3...only the Oilers played the
3-4.
As for the others, Webster should be a lock..something like
7 all pro selections plus 4 rings. Stallworth should also be a
lock with 500+ receptions and 4 rings. Shell should be a lock as
he was all pro more than a couple of times, plus 4 rings. LC should
make it but I doubt he will be a lock. I would say that most if
not all the front four will eventually make it, simply because they
were so dominating during that 10 year span. As for the Chief,
Art Rooney, he is in the hall and BTW, Al Davis was a very big fan
of the Chief, because the Chief helped out Al when he was just starting
out as an owner. The Chief and AL never let the rivalry between
the Steelers and Raiders get in their way...this was quoted by Al
when the Chief died last year.
As for Swann, his longevity might kill his hall election, but
he was great for those 8 years he played. Was there a better or
more graceful receiver that could catch anything thrown near him
at that time?? Maybe, but he has to rank up there at that time
period, plus he has 4 rings and a Superbowl MVP! Swann left the
game simply because he had taken a beating on those crossing patterns
(seems like he had a concussion every year), and wanted to leave
the game healthy and not a cripple.
bill..g.
|
18.164 | | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Wed Jan 17 1990 16:46 | 6 |
| re -1
on the Steeler front four.....
LC might might in. Dwight White and Ernie Holmes might not (probably
not)
|
18.165 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | A hard rain is gonna fall | Wed Jan 17 1990 17:10 | 11 |
| Not a fan of the Steelers or the Browns, but to put things in
perspective:
It's been 25 years since the last Browns world champeenship, but
Steelers fan must remember that prior to their first champeenship
of the 70's, it had been 40+ years of no champeenships. What goes
around comes around.
Just some historical fack (tm).
JD
|
18.166 | Steel Curtain & HOF | COOKIE::SIMON | | Wed Jan 17 1990 19:26 | 12 |
| re: .163, .165
I was looking at a book on the Super Bowl a while back which had each
team's starting lineups for each game. I hadn't remembered that by the
time the 1979 and 1980 bowls rolled around, Steve Furness and John
Banaszak were starting in the front four; in fact, Furness had been
basically a co-starter or starter since 1976 or so. From 1972 until,
say, 1976, the front four were absolutely dominant, but only Greene
and, to a lesser extent, Greenwood, remained at that level until 1980.
I don't see Holmes or White making the hall of fame any more than, say,
Mike Wagner, who was an all-pro safety more than once. Very good
players, all, but not all HOF-able.
|
18.167 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Jan 17 1990 20:25 | 4 |
|
A few back someone asked if any of the old RAIDERS were up for the HoF
this year. They are "Kick 'em in the head" Ted Hendricks, "The Snake"
Ken Stabler, and Al Davis. I think that's all.
|
18.168 | His real nickname | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Some folks trust in reason | Wed Jan 17 1990 21:20 | 7 |
| > "Kick 'em in the head" Ted Hendricks,
? I always knew him as "The Mad Stork". When I was a kid and a pass would
get caught up in the tree branches or something like that it was always
"Blocked...by the Mad Stork". What a legend.
Dan
|
18.169 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | If you think this was bad ... | Thu Jan 18 1990 11:44 | 25 |
| "Kick 'em in the Head" is the nickname that teammates and coaches
knew him by. I suspect he preferred it to the Mad Stork, and in
fact "KEITH" (wow !) is what Madden calls him by even now ..."
Steelers we'll see in the Hall :
Greene
Greenwood (?)
Lambert
Shell
Stallworth
Swann (?)
Webster
Raiders
Dalby
Stabler
Casper (?)
Hendricks (?)
Chester (??)
Alzado
Did I miss anybody ?
|
18.170 | Marc Wilson (???) | SASE::SZABO | Shake those honeybuns! | Thu Jan 18 1990 11:51 | 1 |
|
|
18.171 | ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Thirtysomething Mutant Ninja Daddy | Thu Jan 18 1990 12:15 | 19 |
18.172 | | SALEM::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Thu Jan 18 1990 13:00 | 2 |
| I think he was talking about the ones that aren't there yet.
Denny
|
18.173 | Greene | COOKIE::SIMON | | Thu Jan 18 1990 13:37 | 3 |
| re: last few
Greene already is in the HOF; he was elected about 3 years ago.
|
18.174 | Fred Belitnikoff (sp?) | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | With a sheep under each arm! | Thu Jan 18 1990 13:40 | 0 |
18.175 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Jan 18 1990 13:40 | 11 |
|
Dan,
Doc is correct about the "Kick 'em in the head Ted" nickname. He got it
in practice one day when when he jumped over a pile at the end of a
tackle and accidentally kicked the RB, Van Eaghan I think, in the head,
knocking him silly. "The Mad Stork" moniker was bestowed upon him at
Miami U. and stuck through the Baltimore years. He deserves the HoF.
He was a great LB for many years.
HOOT
|
18.176 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | BoKnowsWhereBambiGoesNothingGrows | Mon Jan 22 1990 19:11 | 5 |
|
|
18.177 | No longer theunique | SHALOT::MEDVID | Sacrifice for a new nirvana | Sun Jan 28 1990 22:01 | 15 |
| Well, Steelers fans, the black and gold no longer are the only ones to
win four SBs. However, we can take solace in the fact that it wasn't
Dallas or the Raiders who tied them. And its still a pretty safe bet
that no one will win four in six years...unless perhaps the
49ers...maybe...nah...they'd have to beat the Steelers to do so and we
know what an impossibility that will be.
It's obvious that the wrong AFC team made it to the Super Bowl this
year. Denver was nothing without their fans screaming and stomping.
No one, in my opinion, would have beaten San Fran, but I'm sure the
Steelers would have given them a much better game.
Go Bub (and his mum)!
--dan'l
|
18.178 | Don't get your hopes up! | LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR | Let it snow! | Mon Jan 29 1990 08:52 | 7 |
|
Not with the quarterback they have...whats his name.???
Bubble Brister?
WOOF!
|
18.179 | | AYNRND::REILLY | Chowmp! | Mon Jan 29 1990 09:30 | 11 |
|
Hey, wouldn't it be great to see the Steelers vs. the 49ers in the
Super Bowl next year?
"Fight For The Team of the Century!"
Or, for that matter, the Vikes vs. the Broncos:
"Remember: Someone *Has* To Win!"
SEAN/BEER=LABATTS
|
18.180 | I agree that the best AFC team wasn't there, IMHO. | SASE::SZABO | | Mon Jan 29 1990 10:26 | 5 |
| Several times during the game, the Steelers popped in my mind. I
couldn't help but think that they would've made it a bit more
interesting........
Hawk
|
18.181 | Steelers would have had some life | COOKIE::SIMON | | Mon Jan 29 1990 11:03 | 8 |
| well, just like after the Washington-Denver Super Bowl...there go the
*rest* of the Steelers' individual and team Super Bowl records. I
could just see Bradshaw up in the booth, saying, "Well, there goes
career touchdown passes." "Well, there goes most touchdown passes in a
game." The same for Swann and Stallworth.
Oh, well...Pittsburgh-S.F. next year, for the "Team of the Century"
battle.
|
18.182 | | HEFTY::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Jan 29 1990 12:15 | 15 |
|
I doubt that the Steeler's really care about those individual
records, afterall, records are made to be broken and Montana is
as deserving as any to break some of them. Adding to that is the
fact that Joe comes from Monongehela (sp..even a native of the area
has trouble with that one) Pa. makes it even better!!
Saw an interesting stat in the paper this morning that listed
Bradshaw as attempting something like (only) 35 passes in his first
two Super Bowls (combined). In that case, he did some serious damage
in SB XIII and XIV.
bill..g.
|
18.183 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | O Ye of little face! | Mon Jan 29 1990 12:16 | 6 |
| My beloved (though sometimes inept) Donks kept Bubble Blister (tm) and the
Squealers (tm) out of the Superbowel (tm) this year, and I hereby predick (tm)
that we will do the same Nexted (tm) year.
BLAM! (tm)
Mike JN (tm)
|
18.184 | | SASE::SZABO | | Mon Jan 29 1990 12:31 | 7 |
| > I hereby predick (tm) that we will do the same Nexted (tm) year.
If it comes down to a rematch, I'll agree with you 100%, Mike JN.
:-)
Hawk
|
18.185 | | CAM::WAY | The Saw is Family | Mon Jan 29 1990 12:52 | 6 |
| And the Black Knight, hacked down to just a bleeding torso, looked
up at his victor and said "Come back here you coward and I'll bite
your filberts off..."
What a pathetic sight... Kind of reminded me of the Broncos fans
today....;^)
|
18.186 | | PNO::HEISER | Forty Niners :== Steelers | Mon Jan 29 1990 13:00 | 3 |
| At least the Steelers beat good teams to earn their Super Bowl rings!
Mike
|
18.187 | It's just a flesh wound!!! | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Putcher money whereyer mouse is! | Mon Jan 29 1990 13:03 | 0 |
18.188 | Let me face the peril! | GENRAL::WADE | That'sprettyboldtalkfora1eyedfatman | Mon Jan 29 1990 13:36 | 1 |
|
|
18.189 | Dream Game | SHALOT::MEDVID | Sacrifice for a new nirvana | Tue Jan 30 1990 10:49 | 12 |
| From today's Charlotte Observer sports page:
What would happen if the best Pittsburgh Steelers team of the 1970s
played the best San Francisco 49ers team of the 1980s? XOR Corp. of
Minneapolis, which produced the computerized NFL "Dream Season"
televised last fall on ESPN, matched the 1978 Steelers and the current
49ers in a copyright computer-simulated game for the Associated Press.
The result: Pittsburgh, Team of the 70s, defeated San Francisco, Team
of the 80 [sic], 26-23. San Francisco's Mike Cofer of Charlotte missed a
field goal with eight seconds left.
-30-
|
18.190 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Remember the Massachusetts 54th ! | Thu Feb 01 1990 13:10 | 3 |
| On another computer, the Niners beat the Steelers 51 out of 100
computer simulations. I hear that Bradshaw wasn't too happy about
it either ...
|
18.191 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Shah,Marcos,Quadaffi,Knorr | Thu Feb 01 1990 13:20 | 9 |
| Comparing the teams, of course, is tough, and simulations are just
simulations. My gut feeling is the Steelers would take it. Why?
The Niners would not be able to run at all - and despite the press
on the Niners passing game, they do need the run (hence Craig's
numerous 1000+ seasons). The Steeler defense was the best I've
ever seened. On offense, I believe Harris and Blier would be able
to run on the Steelers. It would be a good game, IMO.
JD
|
18.192 | I'd say there'd be a plethora of td's..... | SASE::SZABO | | Thu Feb 01 1990 13:47 | 12 |
| JD, the Niners' receiving corps would open up their running game. Guys
like Shell would be forced to do their jobs 40 yards down the field
instead of assisting on tackles at the line of scrimmage. Don't forget
to give the Niners' O-line some credit. Their big, smart, and
disciplined.
But, it's almost like apples and oranges. We're trying to compare 2
very different teams from 2 very different eras, IMHO.
HTH, FYI.
Hawk
|
18.193 | | CAM::WAY | Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Saw | Thu Feb 01 1990 15:35 | 17 |
| I agree Hawk...
It's like trying to compare Matisse to Dali, Wagnerian opera to
heavy metal, french cuisine to New England home cooked meals..
Each is great in its own way, and it's own right....
Can you really compare the last 60's Packers, with the Raiders, Steelers
of the 70's, or the 9ers?
But....
Quien es mas macho? Juan Elway o Jose Montana?
The answer is *easy* there 8^)
'Saw
|
18.194 | Iris Chacon es mas macho <than> Meester Juan Eluai! :-) | SASE::SZABO | | Thu Feb 01 1990 16:44 | 1 |
|
|
18.195 | wha da fah | PFSVAX::JACOB | Go backoff in your own jack yard | Thu Feb 01 1990 16:50 | 9 |
|
JaKe
|
18.196 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | C.Darrow,O.W.Holmes,MrT | Thu Feb 01 1990 16:53 | 3 |
| Iris Chacon butt es muy much biggo than Bubba Paris butt
Sarge
|
18.197 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Feb 01 1990 17:47 | 22 |
|
Actually, comparisons are bound to happen between the only two
teams to win 4 Super Bowls in a span of 10 years.
As for the receivers of the 49'ers stretching out the Steeler's,
I wouldn't count on it. If my memory is correct, the Steeler's
corners were some of the best at "beating up the recievers" (as
Dallas used to say), or call it jamming them at the line. Blount
was one of the best at taking his receiver out of the game. Adding
to that is the fact that the front 4 never gave the QB time to do
much but bend over and prepare to get hit.
The way I see it, the Steeler's would of definately shut down
the 49'ers running game (nobody was ever consistently successful
on running the ball at the steel curtain). I do believe that the
49'ers offense is a little better than that of the Steeler's, but
the 49'ers defense is no where near the force that the Steel Curtain
exhibited.
It would of been a great game no matter what..
bill
|
18.198 | Big Butt, Big Butt comin' atcha... | CAM::WAY | Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Saw | Thu Feb 01 1990 18:26 | 1 |
| Iris Chacon es Roseanne Barr de Univision!
|
18.199 | | PNO::HEISER | Homer Simpson for President | Thu Feb 01 1990 18:43 | 3 |
| Naw Iris is much thinner. At least the last time I saw her she was.
Mike
|
18.200 | Simpson's & Married With Children. Whatta duo!! | WFOV12::MORRISON | On to spring training | Fri Feb 02 1990 08:18 | 7 |
|
>>> PNO::HEISER "Homer Simpson for President"
Good to see someone else enjoys fine comedy.
Bull
|
18.201 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JudgeSirica,ArchibaldCox,MrT | Fri Feb 02 1990 08:27 | 4 |
| Hey Bull, I enjoy fine comedy. I watched all the Patriot games
this year.
/Don
|
18.202 | | CAM::WAY | TomJefferson,AbeLincoln,MrT | Fri Feb 02 1990 09:31 | 1 |
|
|
18.203 | IMO ... | LUNER::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Fri Feb 02 1990 10:59 | 14 |
| re .197
BIll, don't forget that the Steelers played under a different set
of rules from the Niners, a point which even many Steeler supporters
admitted. Back then, the NFL didn't have the 5-yard, one chuck rule,
and the Steelers exploited the system for all taht it was worth.
By today's rules, Blount and Co. would have to give Rice, Taylor,
et al, a little more room than they were accustomed to.
In addition, Rice and Taylor specialize in breaking down a defense,
and turning a short pass into a huge gain. You can bet that B&R
defense would have to be used judiciously, or else there would be
at least a couple of 70 yard + pass and run TD's for the Niners.
|
18.204 | good matchup | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bradshaw knows Elway | Fri Feb 02 1990 11:30 | 14 |
|
I don't know Dock, The Steelers linebackers were excellent in coverage
too. Given that the Steel Curtain would have applied enough pressure
they would have helped out the corners and safties.
I'd say given today's rule the niners probably would win 51 out of
100 because of the liberal holding calls against the offense. If
played under the 70's rules Pitt would win 60 out of 100....
mike
ps. Dock did you catch Shaughnessy's columun in the globe yesterday
about the greatest trio in sports ever? Nothing but the truth!! ;^)
|
18.205 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ACC-ACrookedChris | Fri Feb 02 1990 11:35 | 8 |
| Well I am wondering which Steeler team you would want the Niners
to play? The Steeler team of the 74-75-76 years was probably the
most dominant (or one of 'em) to ever play. The Steeler champions
of the 78-79 seasons had an explosive offense, but the defense had
slipped some, they were still good but nowhere near the level they
had played earlier.
/Don
|
18.206 | '76 Steelers were the best...maybe ever... | SHALOT::MEDVID | Sacrifice for a new nirvana | Fri Feb 02 1990 14:53 | 10 |
| Though they didn't get to the Super Bowl because of injuries during the
playoffs, especially to Harris and Rocky, the '76 Steelers squad was
the best. This opinion is shared by many of the players themselves.
A huge factor in winning the Super Bowl is keeping your star players
healthy. You don't have to win a Super Bowl, however, to be considered
the greatest team ever. If you ask any of the "one-for-the-thumb"
players, they'd say '76. Interesting.
--dan'l
|
18.207 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ACC=ACookedCrisp | Fri Feb 02 1990 15:05 | 7 |
| They may have been the best dan'l, but that team put themselves
in a HUGE hole by losing 2 or 3 of their first four games. Didn't
that team have 3 or 4 shutouts that season? I know they came on
like gangbusters at the end of the season. But, there is no guarantee
that even healthy they would've beaten the Raiders.
/Don
|
18.208 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bradshaw knows Elway | Fri Feb 02 1990 15:12 | 10 |
|
Yes /Don they started 1-3 and demolished the field after that. I
remember the 10 game winning streak we$$....
they absolutely destroyed the Colts in the first round and then the
injuries. No quarantee that they would have beaten the Raiders but
they sure would have had an excellent chance. Especially when you
consider the shaky win the Raiders had over the Patsies......
mike
|
18.209 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | DrM : The Unconscience of SPORTS | Fri Feb 02 1990 15:14 | 4 |
| Pats were a solid team that year Mike. One of the few times
they were.
/Don
|
18.210 | hmmm | LUNER::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Fri Feb 02 1990 15:15 | 27 |
| FWIW IMO, the Steelers of 74-75 would have gave up too much at QB
to beat the Niners. Montana of ANY year was a clearly superior QB
to the 74-75 Bradshaw, no 2 ways about it.
The 76 Steelers were 1-4, Bradshaw was knocked out by a Joe Jones
bodyslam. Behind backup Mike Krucek (BU or BC alum), the Steelers
won their last 9 games, 4 or 5 by shutouts, and gave up a TOTAL
of 27 points.
(I'm going from memory, so ask John H. for confirmation.)
Un-friggin-believable.
That is exhibit A as to why Bradshaw was far from a MVP in those
days.
Anyhow, Montana would have but a lot of pressure on the Steelers
D. The Steel Curtain would have had to shut out the Niners to win.
Because I see too many people underrating the NIners defense. Hell,
they gave up a toal of 26 points in 3 playoff games, and I'd take
their secondary (esp. the 1981-85 one of Lott, Hicks, Williamson,
and Harris) over the Steelers any day.
IMO, of course ...
Doc
|
18.211 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri Feb 02 1990 15:26 | 7 |
| I'll have to look the Steelers 1976 game-by-game record up tonight,
but Mike Kruczek is the slime ball who went to BC who started our
UMass game vs BC in 74 and with a 42-0 BC lead at half time, started
the second half and came out throwing. I'm not sure which former
BC football "hero" I hate more, him or Joe Yukica.
John
|
18.212 | and the seahawks were great for covering 21 point lines back then ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bradshaw knows Elway | Fri Feb 02 1990 15:48 | 17 |
|
/Don didn't say the Patsies weren't a good squad then. They were the
only ones to beat the Raiders that year. I also had them quite a bit.
Dock, for all his fault, Bradshaw didn't loose any of the games for
them unlike some no brain stud from the Rockies :^). He always did
enough to win. Also the Steelers then were a heavy ball control smash
em in the face offensive team back then. True the niners defense is
good but let's face it how badly were they tested this year in the
playoffs? Every team they played was 2 td's in the hole before you
knew and passing happy after that. They excuted some excellent zone
defenses. The Steelers played a more straight up style which would have
benefited them against Rice and co. If I'm playing Montana and that
crew I'd rather take my chances in man to man then a zone. Too many
quick opening gaps for Montana to exploit in a zone...
mike
|
18.213 | | CAM::WAY | Revenge is a dish best served cold... | Fri Feb 02 1990 16:01 | 21 |
| I still say, you cain't compare the Steeler of 70s, with the 9ers
of the 80s...
We can speculate all day, but lets face it, the game of football has
changed so much in 10 years that I don't feel you can compare it.
How can you compare Bach to Wagner...okay, they were both German...that's
about it. Each was a culminator of his period...okay, I'll give you that.
Montana et al, are capable of beating what is being presented to them *now*.
Could this team, with all it's strengths and weaknesses which allow it
to perform so well in this era, perform better than the best of another?
Could the Steelers of then do it better now, against all the changes
of the past 10 years?
The amount of modeling, simulation, and intangible factors you'd have to
take into account would befuddle a Cray!
To me, I look at the 70s and say Steelers (although I believe I heard
somewhere that the Raiders had the winningest record of the 70s)
and the 80s and say 9ers. To go beyond that doesn't make sense to me.
|
18.214 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Feb 02 1990 16:04 | 39 |
|
re: Doc
I agree on the bumping rule, but don't forget that the no bumping
rule was put in BECAUSE of the Steelers. I remember old Tex crying
about the abuse his girly-mon receivers were taking, so he helped
push the no bump rule through. I will also agree that Rice is one
of the best and he would be tough to stop, but Blount wasn't an
easy take either. With over 50 int's and plenty of intimidation,
he wasn't easy pickin's. Wasn't he also the defensive player of
the year at one point?? I belive Joe Greene was too. Add Lambert
as Rookie of the Year, and you have 3 defensive "bests" from 3
different players, from one team, in a span of 6 years. That, is
impressive!
re: 1976
Ahh, I wondered when the Steeler faithful would mention the
best team ever!! :-) I would agree, this was the best of the Steeler
best. I believe they had 4 shutouts after Bradshaw got hurt, and
in so doing, they set the fewest points allowed in one season total.
True to form, both Harris and Blier were hurt (they were only the
2nd pair of running backs to both eclipse 1000 yards in the same
season) going into that AFC championship. The Steelers got killed
by the soon to be crowned champs the Oakland Raiders. Bradshaw's
only recourse was to throw the ball almost every down and the Raider's
new it, so they had little trouble in defending it. Not taking
anything away from the Raiders because I think that between the
Steelers and the Raiders back then, they were the two best teams
in football, period, but one has to wonder if the Steeler's didn't
lose Harris and Blier, the outcome might of been different.
The 76 Steeler defensive unit was simply the greatest defensive
team ever assembled. As I stated earlier, I would give an edge
to the 49'ers on the offensive end, but there is no comparison between
the defensive units, and I believe the Steeler's (74,75,76) would
of shutdown the 49'ers.
bill..g.
|
18.215 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Fri Feb 02 1990 16:52 | 9 |
|
Bill,
Yep, those were some of the greatest games ever played. I remember the
announcers talking about the upcoming RAIDERS-Steelers game several
weeks in advance. There hasn't been a rivalry/series of games that can
come close to those two going at it, since.
HOOT
|
18.216 | | PNO::HEISER | Homer Simpson for President | Fri Feb 02 1990 17:50 | 1 |
| ...and before that it was the Raiders and the Chiefs!
|
18.217 | Can't run against a Steel Curtain | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Feb 02 1990 18:34 | 14 |
| The way I remember it, the 76 Steeler's lost 3 of their first four games
and then Bradshaw got injured and had to sit out for 6 weeks. In those
6 weeks, the defense turned it up a notch, won all 6 games with four of
them being shutouts. Art Rooney "the Chief" always claimed the 76 team
was the best team he ever had.
Also, the defense was incredible dominating in it's prime. I believe it
was 75 but may of been 74 when the Steeler's opponents combined
rushing yardage for all the playoff games and the superbowl was
under a hundred yards. And one those teams was the Buffalo Bills with
O.J. Simpson in his prime.
Keith
|
18.218 | 1976 Steelers | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri Feb 02 1990 18:36 | 23 |
| 28 at Oakland 31
31 Cleveland 14
27 New England 30
6 at Minnesota 17
16 at Cleveland 18
23 Cincinnati 6
27 at Giants 0
23 San Diego 0
45 at Kansas City 0
14 Miami 3
32 Houston 16
7 at Cincinnati 3
42 Tampa Bay 0
21 at Houston 0
342 138 (nowhere close to the record, 44, Bears,
1932)
Playoffs:
40 at Baltimore 14
7 at Oakland 24
John
|
18.219 | Next question please. | SHALOT::MEDVID | Sacrifice for a new nirvana | Mon Feb 05 1990 09:27 | 8 |
|
Chaz Noll said it best last week when asked who would win a dream bowl.
"The 70s were the 70s. The 80s were the 80s. No comparison."
He never was long winded.
--dan'l
|
18.220 | | HEFTY::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Feb 05 1990 11:00 | 25 |
|
re: .218
Those are some interesting scores!! Five, count em, 5 shutouts
and 3 of those on the road with an all most in Cincy.
I also think that one has to take into account the fact that
in the mid 70's, the AFC central was the best conference in football.
The Steelers had to play the Bengals (with Curtis and Anderson)
twice, the Oilers (with Earl) twice, and Cleveland. All of the
AFC Central teams were real tough. There wasn't an easy divisional
game for anyone.
Looking at the 76 team, we also see that they played the two
superbowl teams for that year in Oakland and Minnesota. That was
simply an awesome defensive year for the Steeler's.
I guess that the same arguments will continue forever about
who was best in any sport, but one indicator in some people's minds
is how many players from team x are in the Hall of Fame. As the
road to Canton winds through Pittsburgh right now, time will only
tell how many 49'ers will enter in years to come, but I doubt they
will have the representation that the Steeler's will have from those
teams in the 70's.
bill..g.
|
18.221 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Mon Feb 05 1990 11:08 | 29 |
| re .218
Do I win a prize for accuracy w/o a record book ?
Five shutouts in nine games .... damn !
That's awesome ball. Period.
FWIW, I think we forget that both teams had different strong suits
at different times. THAT is the variable that makes comparison hard.
Not the decade difference.
I mean, let's be real, sure the 70's were different, but can anybody
stand up here and say that the Steelers couldn't play today, and
well ?
This is how I see it :
'74 Steelers vs. '81 Niners - edge to Pitt. because of defense,
and SF's less than awesome ground game.
'74 Steelers vs. '89 Niners - Big edge to SF. Montana head and
shoulders over '74 Bradshaw.
'75 Steelers vs. '84 Niners - Possibly best game of all.
'78 Steelers vs. '88 Niners - Another good game.
Thoughts ?
|
18.222 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Beer me up Scotty | Mon Feb 05 1990 11:29 | 2 |
| So where was the awsome Steeler D against the pa-Raiders in the
Championchip game?
|
18.223 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Beer me up Scotty | Mon Feb 05 1990 11:33 | 3 |
| P.S. the Best Steeler D ever was 0-3 vs. Playoff teams. Does anyone
know the record of the 5 tough teams they shut out. I know Tampa Bay
was pretty awesome that year.
|
18.224 | | CAM::WAY | Revenge is a dish best served cold... | Mon Feb 05 1990 12:18 | 10 |
| I thought Lambert fielded the inevitable "who's better question"
very graciously yesterday on the sidelines of the Pro Bowl.
He said that SF was awesome. When pressed, he did say that the 70s
Steelers had linebackers that could cover backs coming out of the
backfield, and that would have been a plus against the 9ers...
But, as I've said before, you cant' compare...
Chainsaw
|
18.225 | | HEFTY::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Feb 05 1990 16:49 | 26 |
|
re: -2
As "I" stated earlier, the Oakland Raiders and the Steelers
represented the 2 best teams in the NFL during the mid 70's. Both
had great teams and I don't find it unusual that the Steeler's lost
the opener (score was close, maybe the Steeler's got fat after 2
SB wins), and they lost the AFC title game. Where was the Steeler
D?? It was there, but it's kind of hard to shutdown another great
team completely (not to mention the Raiders would become NFL champs
after their next game), let alone win without your main guns broken
(Harris and Blier were both hurt, as was Bradshaw for a good part
of the season).
No one will ever know who was better. Perhaps some team will
come along and win 3 or 4 in a row, then people can talk about them.
In my opinion, the Steeler team of 75-76 would of beaten the 89
edition of the 49'ers. The Steeler's simply had an awesome defense
that nobody really had regular success against, along with a good
offense. Not a great offense like the 49'ers, but Bradshaw and
Co. new what to do with the 'skin in the big games.
The 49'ers IMO have the better offense, but the Steeler's defense
is lightyears ahead of the 49'ers defense, and they all say that
defense is what wins championships. Edge, Steeler's.
bill..g.
|
18.226 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | HimWhatDiesWithTheMostToysWins | Mon Feb 05 1990 18:17 | 9 |
| In comparing the 2 teams, 49er fans will probably give the edge to the
9ers, Steeler fans will give the edge to the Steelers, and all the rest
will give the edge to whoever they like better and use some form of
justification therein.
JaKe
|
18.227 | | COOKIE::SIMON | | Mon Feb 05 1990 18:51 | 32 |
| It's interesting that no comparisons are being made with the 1961-67
Green Bay Packers. I remember when the Steelers reached their
pinnacles a lot of comparisons were made to the 1965-67 Packers that
won 3 NFL championships in a row, the last 2 of which were the 1st 2
Super Bowls.
I agree with JaKe; fans of the Steelers and the 49'ers, and the Packers
for that matter, will naturally favor their own teams. Given the
differences in the game in 1966, 1975, 1979, 1989, etc., it's hard to
make any kind of definitive comparisons, especially considering that
each of these teams (and the 1940 Chicago Bears, the 1958 Colts, any
any other great team for that matter) were built specifically for the
game in their own individual eras.
Being a Steelers fan, I naturally think that one of the Steelers teams
would beat any of the 49'ers teams.
And I agree that the 1976 team *was* the best, and I remember like it
was yesterday that Sidney Thornton or somebody was the only running
back healthy for the AFC championship game with Oakland.
I will say, however, that watching the Super Bowl convinced me that
there probably isn't much difference between this year's 49'ers and any
of the Steelers or Packers teams. I think that the game's results and
Montana's and Rice's individual statistics are skewed upwards by having
played a Denver team that didn't seem to want to play, whereas the
Steelers played 3 of the closest and best Super Bowls in the 2 Dallas
and LA games because the NFC came to play those years. Time will tell,
and if Montana stays healthy - unlike Bradshaw - S.F. may be
unanimously considered the best of all time. Until then, it's great
fun to make the comparisons and have the great Steelers teams somewhat
back in the limelight.
|
18.228 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Mon Feb 05 1990 22:38 | 16 |
|
Coincidently, many people here believe the '87 (I think it's '87,
the one that lost to the Vikes in the 1st round) was the best 49er
team.
John makes a claim that the best team might be the one with the
most HoFers on it. I don't think this is a fair measure of the
49ers. Their real strength is their depth. Today's game is played
with much more situational substitutions. This keeps players more
players on the field, and leads to less star players. THe only
49er Hofers I can see are Montana, Rice, &Lott for sure, Carter
Craig, and Randy Cross as having a good chance, and possily Harris
Barton down the road. The rest are platooned too often.
Bruce
|
18.229 | The 70's reserves even had respect. | SHALOT::MEDVID | Your own personal Jesus | Tue Feb 06 1990 09:22 | 10 |
| All this banter brings to mind my favorite quote pertaining to the
Steelers. It's on one of the NFL highlight films from the championship
years. The late John Fucenda (what a voice) says:
"It's been said that Pittsburgh's reserves could win the AFC
Central; Pittsburgh's starters do."
Damn, they were good.
--dan'l
|
18.230 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bo Doesn't know Arbitration | Tue Feb 06 1990 09:26 | 7 |
| As Bum Phillips said in the '70s, The road to the Super Bowl went thru
Pittsburgh. Now it goes thru San Fran in the NFC and God knows where
in the AFC.
JaKe
|
18.231 | Nothing beats a Packer sweep for beauty, though! | CAM::WAY | | Tue Feb 06 1990 10:09 | 29 |
| But I will still stick to my basic premise.
You can't compare teams from different eras. In the last twenty years
football has changed so much. The reasons are legion, but suffice it
to say that from Lombardi to today there have been many great football
minds. (There's always a special spot in this fan's heart for Lombardi
though...)
Anyway, the game today is so high tech, with situational substitution,
specialists abounding, and much more emphasis on physical conditioning.
Twenty years ago, when the Packers did their "three-peat", the game
was much different.
Linemen were a lot smaller, on the whole, I think. The game was
only 6 or 7 years removed from the last two way player. There weren't
as many specialists (in fact, I remember that Jerry Kramer did the
kicking for the Pack -- and who could forget Lou "the Toe" Groza for the
Browns?)
So, just as I can't compare a pilsner beer to a weiss beer to a dunkels
beer, I don't feel you can compare the three teams from the 60s, 70s
and 80s.
They all had one thing in commmon. They were the dominant force in
pro football, without a doubt....
Chainsaw
|
18.232 | Niners D could shut down a 74-77 Bradshaw ... | EARRTH::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Tue Feb 06 1990 10:26 | 25 |
| Just a couple of points :
1) It is chic to say that the Niners were way behind the Steelers
on defense. I think that's wrong. True the 74-76 Steelers were probably
the most dominating defense in NFL history (except for possibly
the 84-87 Bears), but the Niners defense gave up a TOTAL of 26 points
in 3 playoff games. Say want you want, the Rams and Vikes have
explosive offenses. the Niners shut people down all year when they
had to. And as for Denver, don't blame SF for being so dominating.
Heck they dominated the Fish in the 2nd half of the 85 Super Bowl.
And the defense shut down the hottest QB in league hisotry up to
that point.
And while I love the Steel Curtain, the Niners secondary, IMO, was/is
superior to the Steelers.
The NIners didn't have as many stars and personalities and the
Steelers, nor did they empahtically demolish offenses the way Pitt.
did, but they don't have to take a back seat to anyone.
As Hawk might say, there ain't no flies anywhere near Lott, Carter,
Millian, et al .....
DrM
|
18.233 | | CSC32::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Sheperds | Tue Feb 06 1990 15:24 | 5 |
| I don't even know why you guys are talking about these teams. Every
knowledgeable football fan acknowledges that the best football team of
the modern era was the 1963 Chargers.
Glenn
|
18.234 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ACC=ACookedCrisp | Tue Feb 06 1990 15:33 | 5 |
| Hey Glen, the score in the 1963 AFL Championship game had more
to do with the quality of the opposition than the quality of the
Chargers team. 8^)
/Don
|
18.235 | | CSC32::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Sheperds | Tue Feb 06 1990 15:37 | 3 |
| Ouch Don. What r'ya tryin' to do here? You're hurtin' me! Quit.
Glenn
|
18.236 | | CAM::WAY | | Tue Feb 06 1990 15:41 | 15 |
| But wait, for a limited time only you can receive FREE OF CHARGE
the
/Don How to Goad Your Fellow Noters into a Playground Fisticuff
Video.
And as an added bonus, you'll receive with your paid order the
/Don How to Win Playgroud Fisticuffs the Old Fashioned Way
video, complete with a personal intro from Mike Tyson...
Order yours today!
Chainsaw
|
18.237 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The prize was a rip-off | Tue Feb 06 1990 16:05 | 27 |
| Doctor Midnight,
The stories of Terry Bradshaw being 'dumb' were much exaggerated,
and spread by members of the media, and by teammates who didn't
like Terry, including certain Steeler QB's.
The media ripped into Bradshaw when he first came up. The early
Steeler teams used the run, and then the pass. Much like the Dolphins
before them - remember, Griese only threw about 15 times a game
during the Dolphins hey day, relying on Csonka, Kiick and Morris
to wear down the opposition. The Steelers emulated those sucessful
Dolphin teams, by using Harris, Bleier and Fuqua to wear down the
opposition, and only going to the pass when needed. The Steelers
also rarely used the tight end (Benny Cunningham, wasn't it).
Don't kid youself about the quality of Bradshaw. When he was forced
to throw, he was a winner. He proved that time and time again.
And no bunk about hte quality of the receivers he had, Montana has
better receivers.
As for the defensive secondary, I'd take the Steeler secondary over
the Niner, but not by much, and of course, I'd like Lott to be on
either one, along with Blount.
But, they were different times.
JD
|
18.238 | | IAMOK::AHEARN | | Tue Feb 06 1990 16:10 | 16 |
| I'm interested in seeing how the Steelers will employ Merrill Hoge and
Tim Worley next season. Worley was expected to have a huge impact in
the NFL last year (per Joel Bushbaum (sp?), Mel Kiper and other draft
experts) and instead, Hoge came into his own!! They give the Steelers
one of the stronger backfield (this is not intended to start a pissing
contest....I said ONE of the strongest....NOT the strongest)
combinations in the NFL......but often times there are not enough balls
to go around when you have more than one stud!! Worley is bound to
improve.....will the Steelers allow for his improvement at Hoge's
expense?
Enquiring minds gots to know......
Nelly
|
18.239 | Browns picked #1. | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Let it snow! | Tue Feb 06 1990 16:18 | 6 |
|
Come on Squeeler fans.....don't worry about it....the team will
be in the basement next year! Can't you see the light???
Woof!
|
18.240 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Bible,Koran,Donk Newspaper | Tue Feb 06 1990 16:30 | 5 |
| If it wasn't for the "Immaculate Deception" the RAIDERS would have been the
team of the 70's!!!!!;^)
Monty
|
18.241 | GAJ!! | IAMOK::AHEARN | | Tue Feb 06 1990 16:33 | 12 |
| re: .239
Whitehair,
Do you have ANYTHING constructive to say about sports.....or do you
just run through the notesfile slinging shit?!!!
Help this hopes,
Nelly
|
18.242 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bo DOESN'T know Arbitration!! | Tue Feb 06 1990 16:56 | 16 |
| re.238
Worley spent much of last year nursing various injuries. He was,
however, healthy at the end of the season and 2 of his last 3 games
were 100+yds with the third being somewhere in the 90 yd region.
I expect the Steelers to use Worley and Hoge much as they used Harris
and Bleier in the 70's. Run 'em both a few times, see who the defense
is keying on and beat the sh$t out of em with the other back.
JaKe
Re Whitehead What can you expext from someone who comes from the
world's only inhabited raw sewage dump, CLEVESCUM.
|
18.243 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Putcher money whereyer mouse is! | Tue Feb 06 1990 17:59 | 10 |
|
Regarding the oft repeated, and widely repeated rumor, by some of
Football's most knowledgeable fans and players, that Terry Bradshaw was dumber
than a box of rocks:
Where there's schmuck there's fire.
HTH
Mike JN
|
18.244 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | Donks played most egregiously Dude | Tue Feb 06 1990 19:43 | 15 |
| This is really funny. The Donk fans calling Bradshaw stupid. ha ha, he
was so stupid that......
He's got 4 Superbowl rings
He's in the HoF
He predicted a 55-3 score in the game
He looked at Elway and plainly stated the troof..he's not a great QB
Pooooor Terry. I suppose, MJOHNSON, HUNTER, and the rest of the
Donk_Jihad think ol' Horse teef is some kind of rocket scientist.
Too bad Smellway can't match Bradshaw in any category you come up with.
Wah Wah Wah, call of the Donk_Jihad, Wah Wah Waaaaahhhhh
Not_really_JoJ
|
18.245 | | GENRAL::WADE | I mean what you know.... | Tue Feb 06 1990 19:51 | 12 |
| Well if it isn't the vane.....
I'll throw a category out that I'll just bet Elway can compare:
TOTAL YARDS PASSING AND RUSHING AT THE EQUIVALENT TIME IN
BRADSHAW'S CAREER (ie after his first 7 years)
Jo?, don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to turn this into an
LDUC, but such outrageous statements can't go unchecked. Maybe
John Hendry will do us the favor of looking this up?
Claybone
|
18.246 | how mamy 40 yard td's did he throw hahahhaa | CNTROL::CHILDS | Tyson to sucker Hogan, I hope | Tue Feb 06 1990 21:35 | 14 |
|
reach Claybone reach .......
hahahhaaaa
Bottom line is Bradshaw went to atleast 2 or 3 superbowls in first 7
years and his team won them all can Mr. Ed say the same?
I think not....
given that the Steelers had a great running game and the Donks had
squat until this year Ed's numbers better be better....
mike
|
18.247 | | CSOA1::SCHRAMM | | Wed Feb 07 1990 10:54 | 11 |
|
Elway is not a winner period. How can a guy go to the Super Bowl 3
times and choke badly each time (at least Fran did not have 4 horrible
games in the Superbowl). You knew from the first snap that Elway took
in the Superbowl that he was going to have a horrible game.
Bradshaw was right. Elway has sooo much talent no doubt. BUT until he
gets HUNGRY and wants to win he will not amount to anything.
|
18.248 | The truuf | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bo DOESN'T know Arbitration!! | Wed Feb 07 1990 11:31 | 20 |
|
When the BIG one is on the line:
w l pct
Bradshaw 4 0 1.000
Elway 0 3 .000
Need I say more.
JaKe
|
18.249 | | PNO::HEISER | eschew obfuscation | Wed Feb 07 1990 12:21 | 1 |
| I thought SmElway was 0-4?
|
18.250 | | SALEM::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Wed Feb 07 1990 12:44 | 2 |
| He wasn't around in '78. I think Craig Mortin blew that one.
Denny
|
18.251 | With the 74-76 Bradshaw, he didn't have to win, just avoid losing | LUNER::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Wed Feb 07 1990 13:26 | 6 |
| Give a break JaKE. With that defense in 74-75, Elway, you, me, or
LiteLocks could have won those SB's. The record book shows that
the Steelers didn't suffer too much with Joe Gilliam in there in
74 (or Krucek in 76) did they ?
DrM
|
18.252 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | Donks played most egregiously Dude | Wed Feb 07 1990 13:51 | 12 |
| C'mon you guys, don't any of you remember the great touch passes that
Bradshaw used to throw. Sure, Swan made some great catches, but I can
still see Bradshaw throwing those arcs down the sideline just out of
reach of the defender.
Staubach too. As much as I hated Dallas, I'll defend his abilities to
the death.
To compare Smellway with these guys is a joke. Kinda like comparing
Strawberry to DiMaggio.
JoJ
|
18.253 | | GENRAL::WADE | I mean what you know.... | Wed Feb 07 1990 14:08 | 7 |
| Hey, Jo? said *any* category! I threw one out that I'm fairly
sure Elway is superior to the toofless wonder in. That's not
reaching.......that's refuting an untrue statement. Now if he
had said something about Elway's won-loss record in the SB
compared to Bradshaw's.....
Claybone
|
18.254 | | USRCV1::COLOTTIR | Thick as a brick | Wed Feb 07 1990 16:11 | 7 |
| Clayboner, until this year the Donk's had virtually zilch in the
running dept. So you'd expect Elway's passing yds. to be greater
than Broadshaw's(tm). This argument is crazy. Broadshaw(tm) won
4 SB's. Elway? Zip. Whose better? Subjective. Who had the better
team around him? Broadshaw. The best? THE SNAKE!!:-)
Raider_Rich
|
18.256 | because it's the Donks and Mr. Ed.... ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Tyson to sucker Hogan, I hope | Wed Feb 07 1990 16:39 | 1 |
|
|
18.257 | Steven, I think your spending to much time in Note 110. 8^) | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ACC=ACookedCrisp | Wed Feb 07 1990 16:41 | 1 |
|
|
18.258 | | GENRAL::WADE | I mean what you know.... | Wed Feb 07 1990 17:00 | 7 |
| Asdlfh rpepqoi askdoufe uiopoejf dhghtka <hack, cough> patooey!
Thanks Steven....I had to get those *words* out of my mouth.
I thought it was a fairly simple concept but some people
gots to be hit up side the haid with a hammer...:^)
Clay
|
18.259 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | Mario is a Cherry Picker | Wed Feb 07 1990 19:20 | 5 |
| perhaps I should restate my silly-assed statement...how bout we go with
"Bradshaw is better than Smellway in any catagory important to sports
noters"
JoJ
|
18.260 | | CAM::WAY | | Wed Feb 07 1990 20:27 | 14 |
| Elway could not carry the jock of any of the following QBs...
Unitas, Starr, Tittle, Tarkenton, Staubach, Layne,
Baugh, Jurgenson....Montana
Tarkenton probably rushed for as many yards, scrambling to complete
passes, excepting that they don't count scrambling behind the line
as rushing.
Personally, I think that Staubach was just as good of a rusher, in
that he was rarely contained because he ran when they didn't expect.
Teams plan to contain SmElway(tm). Also, Staubach was a better two
minute drill QB.
|
18.261 | in the last 15 years | LUDWIG::JAMES | | Wed Feb 07 1990 22:36 | 5 |
| re. -1
In my mind, Staubach is the best two minute QB.
Steve J.
|
18.262 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Tyson to sucker Hogan, I hope | Thu Feb 08 1990 11:09 | 7 |
|
I don't know Steve, Montana is none too shabby and the "Snake" was a
master of it too....
Still though if anything these 3 guys are all on the same level...
mike
|
18.263 | THE SQUEELERS WERE LUCKY LAST YEAR. | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Let it snow! | Thu Feb 08 1990 11:14 | 10 |
|
Yea, one below.........
B E R N I E !
WOOF
WOOF
WOOF!
|
18.264 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mario's streak=43 games | Thu Feb 08 1990 11:36 | 11 |
| Hey whitehead
Bernie "Fudge" Kosar is a good two minute QB. Yeah, Right, he shows up
for a good two minutes every game.
JaKe
|
18.265 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Mcfall=francessa , true sport wizards | Thu Feb 08 1990 12:34 | 2 |
| mr whitehair rooled too many dice at the roulet tables :))
|
18.266 | | GENRAL::WADE | R.Clemens,M.Lemieux,K.Malone,J.Elway | Thu Feb 08 1990 13:53 | 7 |
| JoJ, let's see.....that would be jock holding, pee-pee smooching,
etc...
Steve, you're just saying that cuz he used to whup our Redskins
all the time ;^)
Clay
|
18.267 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | Mario is a Cherry Picker | Thu Feb 08 1990 14:15 | 17 |
| Frank, I'd like to add some names to your list:
Franks List:
Unitas, Starr, Tittle, Tarkenton, Staubach, Layne,
Baugh, Jurgenson....Montana
Plus:
Namath, Stabler, Bradshaw, Marino
However, Elway could, and probably has, held the Jocks of the
following:
Flutie, Wilson, Burlein, Schroeder, Simms, and Brunner
|
18.268 | | CAM::WAY | | Thu Feb 08 1990 19:34 | 28 |
|
>Franks List:
>
> Unitas, Starr, Tittle, Tarkenton, Staubach, Layne,
> Baugh, Jurgenson....Montana
>
> Plus:
>
> Namath, Stabler, Bradshaw, Marino
>
> However, Elway could, and probably has, held the Jocks of the
> following:
>
> Flutie, Wilson, Burlein, Schroeder, Simms, and Brunner
JoJ,
I'll take your 4 names for my list as a sub-echelon. The names I mentioned
are surely the Pantheon of QBs. The four you mentioned are probably
one slight level below.
And finally, putting Simms in that group was an obvious move to get my
goat. Won't work. Simms is not close to the four you mentioned (although
he does possess the 3rd best percentage passing day ever) but he's not in
that category (you WAD ;^))
Chainsaw
|
18.269 | Namath>>>Tarkenton | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | When it hits, you feel okay | Thu Feb 08 1990 20:24 | 6 |
| Frank, anyone from the NY/NJ area who grew up watching Namath and
Tarkenton knows that there's no "pantheon" that could hold Fran and not
make room on a much higher pedestal for Joe. Fran didn't hold a candle
to him.
Dan
|
18.270 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 08 1990 20:52 | 14 |
|
Re. Tark and Joe Willie:
Neither of 'em should be in the "Pantheon". Ditto Tittle, Layne,
and Stabler. All of these guys, except Tarkenton, threw more
interceptions than touchdowns. Tarkenton just threw more than anybody.
Jurgensen and Unitas threw for high percentage, high yardage, and
low interceptions before that became easy to do, over extended careers.
A Pantheon of the Ages would be: Baugh, Graham, Jurgensen, Unitas,
Starr, Montana. I'm still trying to make up my mind about Marino.
glenn
|
18.271 | Bengals for the AFC Central | EAYV01::DWALLACE | Fraggle Rock Detective | Fri Feb 09 1990 10:40 | 12 |
| Hi there steeler fans.
Just thought i would tell you THE MIGHTY BENGALS will dominate
the AFC CENTRAL next season.I was very disappointed that you lost
the playoff game to Denver because you were the better team on the
day.As for Quarterbacks you have got to admit Boomer,s the best
ever in the AFC.The bengals will win the AFC,with the Steelers maybe
in second place.As for Litelocks Brownspot choke outfit they will
be nowwhere.
Bye for now
Scotland,s No 1 bengal fan
Alibengal
|
18.272 | Taske it to 79.* | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mario's Streak= 44 games | Fri Feb 09 1990 11:49 | 16 |
| >>Hi there steeler fans.
>> Just thought i would tell you THE MIGHTY BENGALS will dominate
>>the AFC CENTRAL next season.
C'mon Aliwhoever,
The sports.joke note is 79.***
Boomer best ever in AFC, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH, I'm P!ssing myself laughing.
Bungles to finish 7-9 next year.
JaKe
|
18.273 | THIS WHOLE FILE IS A JOKE! | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Let it snow! | Fri Feb 09 1990 12:28 | 13 |
|
Boy that other guy is really a laugh.....Boomer?????Ha!
Squeelers in second place...another laugh.....Ha!
By the way, what is in Squeeler Contry anyway???? From what
I've seen on TV only (I'd never want to go there myself) it looks
like a very run down place. Everyone looks so cold there. Not
the weather either. Do women actually live there too....oops...
I forgot about Jaka$$. HeHeHe. Now really, what is there in Pittsburg
that would bring anyone there??? I have no idea.
WOOF!
|
18.274 | | SALEM::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Fri Feb 09 1990 12:35 | 5 |
| re:.273
And all this from someone from CLEVELAND! He doesn't expect to
be taken seriously does he? And yes, I've been to both so I know
what I'm talking about at least.
Denny
|
18.275 | | CAM::WAY | | Fri Feb 09 1990 12:42 | 19 |
| Re Tark in Pantheon....
I included Tark not on the basis of his statistics, but on the
basis of his scrambling. When Tark came into the league, no one
did that. He kind of redefined the term "mobile QB". If nothing else,
he was exciting to watch.
Layne was a hothead, egocentric kind of guy, but he got things done.
I would exclude him, if pressed.
Namath, contrary to Dan's green-shaded-glasses-blindness is known to
be great for one game. True, he is in the HoF, and I don't dispute that.
But he is not in the pantheon....
If any one needs to know, my personal favorites are Starr and Unitas.
JMHO,
Chainsaw
|
18.276 | Here is a GUID SCOTS TUNG LASHIN FUR YIZ. | EAYV01::DWALLACE | Fraggle Rock Detective | Fri Feb 09 1990 13:01 | 18 |
| Sufferin socatash,
Ahv neffur hurd ismuch "stranger to the truth"
blurbino ma daiz izanamericanfitbasupportur. Ifyiz want meti
spredma gidfitbanowlij, then awillsun.
Furstli : Yooz Skweelurs hivniachanse in bugguri o' winnin onithin
inthinext10yeers yiken.
Aye aheer yizo askinmi howakum aboot thiswee theeri o' minz. Itsoffi
simpul - yiz canni winmunni gemz sittin onyur bums antokin aboot
the gidol daiz in theseevintiz.
Itmicht huv slippd yur silli heidz, bit its still reccumendit tae
replase yurol playurs wi nyoowans.
Translation by way of request during preceeding notes.
Alibengal bigrubbirlips.
|
18.277 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Feb 09 1990 15:26 | 16 |
|
re: .273
What is in Squeeler Contry?? Well, if you must know, Pittsburgh
just happens to be the 3rd largest corporate headquarters among
cities. Four years ago, if was voted as the most livable city in
the country by Rand McNally and I believe they fell to 4th in their
last survey. Not bad for a city whose reputation used to be one
of Steel Mills and dirty air. I'd say it made a pretty good comeback
along with the Steelers over the last 20 years.
As for qb's, Western Pa. has produced their share of great ones.
Namath, Unitas, Montana, and Marino to name a FEW..
bill..g.
|
18.278 | Blow it out your a$$, Emptyhead | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mario's Streak= 44 games | Fri Feb 09 1990 18:36 | 9 |
| re.273
Hey whitehead
Come to Pittsburgh and see the pipeline that pumps our raw sewage
straight to Clevescum(tm).
JaKe
|
18.279 | No, No...don't make me go to Cleveland!! | COOKIE::SIMON | | Fri Feb 09 1990 19:39 | 9 |
| re: .273 & replies to that:
My family moved from Pittsburgh to the deserts of Tucson in 1974 and
my dad left the company he had been with for 15 years because he was
transferred to the one place in the U.S. where no one in the family,
neighborhood, or entire state would move.....
Cleveland.
|
18.280 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | oh-ooh Black Betty, Ram-Balam | Fri Feb 09 1990 19:42 | 6 |
| re.279
At least no one in their right mind.
JaKe
|
18.281 | BOOMER AND THE BOYS RULE THE CENTRAL | EAYV01::DWALLACE | Fraggle Rock Detective | Mon Feb 12 1990 12:59 | 15 |
| Hi Steeler fans
Alibengal here.Was just wondering what you thought about last
seasons blowouts by the mighty bengals
Bengals 42 Steelers 10
Bengals 26 Steelers 16
Bengals 21 Clevescum 14
Bengals 21 Clevescum 0
Bengals 61 Oilslicks 10
Bengals 22 Oilslicks 24
Now if that is'nt total domination of the AFC CENTRAL
i don't know what is.What's more it's going to continue.
Alibengal Scotlands No 1 Bengal fan.
|
18.282 | Cinci - Pig Slaughterer of the U.S. | SHALOT::MEDVID | Your own personal Jesus | Mon Feb 12 1990 13:16 | 12 |
| Woweee! Big stats! Got any more to throw at us? Funny, though, but I
seem to remember that the only AFC Central team not in the Playoffs
was...um...hmmmm...oh yeah...the Bun-gals. Until you have a stat that
can top that (good luck), don't bother to reply.
How was Pig Town on Suday's after Christmas? Ask any of the Cinci
players; they were there in front of the tube!
Is there a Bengals note? If so, go cry in there. If not, it's surely
because no one gives a flying **** about them.
--dan'l
|
18.283 | Take this... | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Let it snow! | Mon Feb 12 1990 13:37 | 12 |
| re: -2
Oh my goodness....where did this guy come from....trying to
start some crap...I see. This guy knows not to show up in the
Browns or Bernie's file. Total domination of the Squeelers maybe
but, no one else! Look for the Squeelers to come in last this
next year...Bangles...a close third!
Just ask Bernie!
Woof!
|
18.284 | | USRCV1::COLOTTIR | Shoot James Brown | Mon Feb 12 1990 18:41 | 4 |
| Alibengal, you just had to start spoutin' off and get ol' Hal fired
up again, didntja :-)
Raider_Rich
|
18.285 | Tell the truth! | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Let it snow! | Fri Feb 16 1990 11:37 | 52 |
|
RE: The note I received this morning from
SCOMAN::CLEVELAND BROWNS PRES.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
I can't stop laughing!
There is only one person I know who could have sent
this outragiously funny thing. Then to give it away and tell
me about a 37 - 21 loss to the Donks. Then to say that the
Browns would have lost 88 to nothing to the 9ers. HaHaHa!
I think I heard this one before. Right here in this note!
Jake, It was YOU! Wasn't it!
The reason I'm writting now is to let everyone know
what you said about your great Sqeeler team. Well, not the
team, but, about the great quarterback they have. Bubble head
Brister! This guy actually said "and we have no quarterback".
He admitted it! The Squeelers have "NO QUARTERBACK". This
comming from a fan...suposibly? I question his support of
the city in which he comes. It seems that he is comming to
understand what I've been telling him for months. The Squeelers
were a lucky team in making the playoffs last year and that
they will be lucky to get third this comming year. Can we
take the "NO QUARTERBACK" statement as saying NO TEAM? I think
we can! Lets face it...if you have "NO QUARTERBACK" then how
can you have a team? The quarterback makes the team!
Jake, lets admit it...to everyone here. I think the
other true Squeeler fans will want to know the truth!
Go ahead and say it....YOU LOVE THE BROWNS AND THE
CITY THEY COME FROM. Don't you?
Maybe its the stigma ..... DAWGS you like so much.
Woof
Woof
Woof
Woof
Dawgs are
THE AFC CENTRAL DIVISION CHAMPIONS!
Hal
|
18.286 | Go soak your head, Whitexcrement | PFSVAX::JACOB | oh-ooh Black Betty, Ram-Balam | Fri Feb 16 1990 13:10 | 15 |
| Re .285
Tweren't me. I been out sick all week. Ain't been on the system since
last Friday.
Brister will go on to become a better career QB than Bernie
"Fudgepacker" Kosar can ever hope to. Bernie's career will end soon
because of his elbow problems. Diagnosis from Clevescum that I heard
says Bernie has "Whacker's Elbow". Incurable by any medicine.
S T E E L E R S W I L L R U L E A F C C E N T R A L I N '9 0
JaKe
|
18.287 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | oh-ooh Black Betty, Ram-Balam | Fri Feb 16 1990 13:13 | 27 |
|
OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is my world coming apart?????????
Just heard on the radio this AM
The Steelers are set to hire:
J O E "BOOGER" W A L T O N
as their new offensive co-ordinator.
AW SH@T.
Just when things were looking up, too.
Guess I'll have to turn my attention to the Seachickens or Chiefs.
Oh Well,
Maybe they can win DESPITE Walton.
JaKe
|
18.288 | I'm going home and back to bed. | SHALOT::MEDVID | Now it's ACID ROCK | Fri Feb 16 1990 13:30 | 14 |
| After reading .287, all the excitement I was preparing for the '90
season has just drained from my body.
However, I speak with little knowledge on this subject. What *is*
Walton's track record as an OC? If it's good, maybe the Steelers ain't
so dumb. Some guys just weren't meant to be head coach.
Also, heaven forbid, could this be a move for the future? Could they
be setting up Walton for head coach when Noll chooses to retire
sometime in the coming decade?
Let me check my calendar; is this April 1?
--dan'l
|
18.289 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | oh-ooh Black Betty, Ram-Balam | Fri Feb 16 1990 13:37 | 9 |
| Let's face it, Walton sipped as head coach of the Jets.
BUT
Is Noll that dumb to hire him as OC if the guy has no ideas??
|
18.290 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Waiting in the wings... | Fri Feb 16 1990 13:57 | 5 |
| Yuo guys may not believe this, but Walton has had a great rep as
an offensive coordinator, he just couldn't handle being a head
coach. I think he'll do fine.
JD
|
18.291 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri Feb 16 1990 14:14 | 16 |
| Ron Erhardt was the same way when he was with the Patriots. His
problem was that he treated the players too nicely and they walked
all over him. Raymond Berry is a nice guy, but despite his faults
as a head coach, his players respect him.
I compare Joe Walton to Don Zimmer in a sense. They were both
excellent in subordinate positions - Walton as OC with the Jets,
Zimmer as 3rd base coach with the Sox. Both worked in tough media
markets. Both got promoted. I don't know much about Walton as
Jets head coach, but I do know Zimmer managed defensively (ie, managed
not to lose, as opposed to managing to win) as manager of the Sox,
in part due to media and fan pressure. If Walton was the same way,
then going back to an Offensive Coordinator position in a less
pressure-packed place than New York will be the best thing for him.
John
|
18.292 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Celtics destroy/destroyed the/by West | Fri Feb 16 1990 14:24 | 18 |
|
Not if Walton goes the same route as AirHead (aka Erhardt). For New
York, Airhead has lost all the imagination he may have possesed. We
of the Giants Jihad have been calling for his head for years. I think
some of the problem has to do with basic Giants philosphy dicates that
he runs and runs again. I also think he just isn't very good at making
adjustments to the adjustments made by the defense.
Every week it seems the Giants come out on fire and score a TD or
FG (unfortunately the more likely one) on thier first drive of the
game. Later on in the game they're lost.....
Walton didn't do bad offensively for the Jets when they were healthy
except for his perchant for the third down draw which Weeb left behind.
Jets could always score problem was they couldn't stop anyone from
scoring....
mike
|
18.293 | Jake, jump on the Oiler bandwagon ! | FRSBEE::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Fri Feb 16 1990 14:58 | 9 |
| Walton was considered an excellent OC with the Skins. He is given
a large share of the credit for turning Joe Theisman into a competent
NFL QB.
And he has got to be better than Chuck "Is the TE eligible" Noll.
"Whacker's Elbow" Too funny ! Seriously Flooward !
DrM
|
18.294 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | oh-ooh Black Betty, Ram-Balam | Fri Feb 16 1990 16:08 | 14 |
| >> -< Jake, jump on the Oiler bandwagon ! >-
Dr. Midracingstripeintheshorts:
Nah.
I want a team with a chance of winning it all. Guess I'll stay with
the Steelers for another year. They got the best chance in the AFC
Central next year as long as they stay healthy.
JaKe
|
18.295 | Lets see bubble heads stats then. | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Let it snow! | Fri Feb 16 1990 16:43 | 20 |
|
Jake,
I'll find that very same statement in here somewhere.......It
will take some time, but, I will find it!
You can admit it though! You will have to. I'm not talking
about last week when you were sick either....I'm talking about THIS
morning! So, that blows your alibi! Can you come up with another
one?
What were you doing this morning at 1AM?
All we want to do is to show the other Squeeler fans how loyal
you truely are.
Woof
Woof
Woof
Woof
|
18.296 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | oh-ooh Black Betty, Ram-Balam | Fri Feb 16 1990 17:29 | 17 |
| Hey White-penicular-excrement:
I don't have the slightest idea what the hell you are talking about.
First of all, I have no computer, terminal or any other device at home
or anywhere near my bed where I was at 1AM today. Secondly, you said
that the node name was SCOMAN::. I have no access to that system
whatsoever. The only systems I have access to are SUPVAX:: and
PFSVAX::. Seems to me that SCOMAN:: is a system that I've seen
associated with YOUR name here somewhere. I smell a scandal brewing
with possible false accusations on your part just to stir things up a
bit.
May the Sacred cow of India leave a night deposit in your pillowcase.
JaKe
|
18.297 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Fri Feb 16 1990 19:21 | 1 |
| Woof and Jake, why don't you guys handle this through MAIL.
|
18.298 | Slap him around Jake, don't take NO stuff !!! | EARRTH::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Fri Feb 16 1990 20:36 | 3 |
| No Keith !
This is gREAT stuff !
|
18.299 | Just can't prove it.....Darn. | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Let it snow! | Sat Feb 17 1990 13:03 | 17 |
|
Sorry Big Mac, but, I'm not trying to start any trouble, you see,
I just want to let everyone know Jakes real feelings....
Unfortunately I can't prove it. I searched and searched but
could not locate the 88 - 0 prediction. So, unfortunately I have
to withdraw my accusation. Sorry Jake for thinking that you would
do such a thing. Or I should say, that you would even know how
to do such a thing.
At any rate, its out in the open, and I'll let the jnoters
deceide for themselves weather you did it or not. There is a
Squeeler fan out there who really feels this way and I must say
I can't blame him (in Jakes case...Her).
Hal
|
18.300 | Walton will get Steeler OC job | PFSVAX::JACOB | oh-ooh Black Betty, Ram-Balam | Mon Feb 19 1990 16:59 | 16 |
| It appears that Chuck Noll has offered Joe Walton the job of Offensive
coordinator of the Steelers. The only thing that remains between
Walton and the job is a contract, which is being negotiated right now.
Seems that the Steelers can pay Walton anything they want for the next
2 years, the Jets owe him $800k per year and will pay the difference
between what the Steelers pay him and $800k. The stumbling block right
now is not money but length. Walton is looking for a contract in
excess of 4 years.
From what input JoJ has put in the Jets note, Walton will institute
an offense known as the "Pick & Flick". :-)
JaKe
|
18.301 | FYI | SHALOT::MEDVID | Now it's ACID ROCK | Mon Feb 19 1990 17:05 | 8 |
| Don't know how many of you know this, but FWIW, Joe Walton is from
Pittsburgh and played his college ball at Pitt. Tight end, wasn't he?
My dad used to travel the country following Pitt. I can remember him
telling me of one game against OU in Norman where Walton won the game
on a catch with time running out.
--dan'l
|
18.302 | Plan-B?? | REFINE::MISURACA | UCONN: The Cinderella Story | Mon Feb 19 1990 17:25 | 2 |
| Does anyone know if the Steelers have looked at any of the Plan B free
agents?
|
18.303 | Mike Ditka maybe? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 19 1990 18:20 | 10 |
|
Yep, Walton was All-American at end (not tight end) in 1956. This
information comes courtesy of my 1989 Pitt Official Program from last
year's Pitt-Penn State game. (Don't worry, I'm a Penn State fan.)
I'm not sure how Walton caught a pass to beat Oklahoma in Norman since
OU was undefeated 1953-57, and Walton graduated in 1956.
glenn
|
18.304 | Same team maybe? | SHALOT::MEDVID | Now it's ACID ROCK | Mon Feb 19 1990 19:16 | 14 |
| Yeah, I know Ditka was a tight end for Pitt. Did they play on the same
teams in the 50's? Perhaps I just got confused because they were
mentioned in the same breath.
Or maybe my dad is a liar...
Or maybe he's really not my dad...
Or, worse yet, maybe my dad is Joe Walton and that's why I pick my nose
so much.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!
--dan'l
|
18.305 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | But I don't like spam | Mon Feb 19 1990 19:36 | 11 |
| re a few back
The Steelers were looking at a QB from Green Bay, the name Randy Wright
sticks in my mind but I'm not sure if that's the right name. They want
somebody with some experience to back up Brister. Todd Blackledge is
not the one they want as backup though. Don't know if they signed
anybody else, though.
JaKe
|
18.306 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | B4I4Q, RU^18,QT3.14??? | Mon Feb 19 1990 19:52 | 9 |
| Just called the local paper to check, Randy Wright IS the QB the
Steelers are negotiating with.
Also, Joe Walton DID sign a contract with the Steelers, but the terms
haven't been disclosed.
JaKe
|
18.307 | | REFINE::MISURACA | UCONN: The Cinderella Story | Tue Feb 20 1990 12:03 | 3 |
| re: -1
Thanks for the info!!
|
18.308 | | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Thu Feb 22 1990 10:59 | 4 |
| re a few back
I believe that Pittsburgh is looking at a safety from thee Patriots....
(cannot remember his name though .....)
|
18.309 | | STARVU::MACGREGOR | | Thu Feb 22 1990 11:18 | 6 |
| >I believe that Pittsburgh is looking at a safety from the Patriots...
>(cannot remember his name though...)
Clayborn perhaps???
The Wizard
|
18.310 | | PWRVAX::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Thu Feb 22 1990 11:35 | 2 |
| Clayborn's a Corner.
Denny
|
18.311 | Its probably Jim Bowman | HPSRAD::SANTOS | A monster is being built. | Thu Feb 22 1990 12:37 | 0 |
18.312 | Not a bad player at all | 4159::NAZZARO | AC Green = All-Star misfit | Thu Feb 22 1990 12:50 | 4 |
| Nope, it's Darryl Holmes. He's from the PIttsburgh area, and would
be a pretty good pick-up.
NAZZ
|
18.313 | Rod Rust Replacement??? | 6348::BOYD | | Wed Feb 28 1990 10:52 | 7 |
|
Anyone know who the Steelers are going to hire to replace Rod Rust??
I hate to see them lose the one thing that kept their defense together
last year...
Jim B.
|
18.314 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | Jets/Yanks/DEVILS in 1990 | Wed Feb 28 1990 10:55 | 3 |
| They have Joe Walton...what else could they possibly need.
JoJ
|
18.315 | | PWRVAX::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Wed Feb 28 1990 12:06 | 2 |
| ...Ray Berry?
Denny
|
18.316 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | personal name set hidden | Thu Mar 01 1990 10:12 | 8 |
| They promoted their linebacker coach, last name Brazil or Brazille or
something like that.
The Steelers also signed Randy Wright, former Green Bay QB as back-up
to Brister.
JaKe
|
18.317 | Clarification on -.1 | PFSVAX::JACOB | set hidden at moderator's request | Thu Mar 01 1990 10:14 | 4 |
| The linebacker coach was promoted to defensive coordinator.
JaKe
|
18.318 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Mar 01 1990 16:49 | 6 |
| Oh No..... Not the ever popular and awesome Randy Wright....
I know he led the Packers to at least 2 or 3 Superbowls. With
Walton on the Squealers coacking staff they'll be losers for
sure. Looks like another cake walk to the bowl for the Broncos !
Big Game
|
18.319 | | REFINE::ASHE | Science! | Thu Mar 01 1990 22:02 | 1 |
| Robert Brazille? Like the ex-oiler? What's Dr. gonna do?
|
18.320 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Isthatyourfaceordidyourneckpuke | Fri Mar 02 1990 10:03 | 8 |
| David Brazil is the Steelers new Defensive Co-ordinator's name.
He coached the linebackers last year and coached with Rod Rust at
KC 2 years ago. He also was DC at a few colleges over the last 15
years.
JaKe
|
18.321 | Here today...gone today? | SHALOT::MEDVID | Sitting waiting anticipating nothing | Mon Mar 19 1990 12:06 | 12 |
| I was in St. Thomas last week where they still haven't recovered from
Hurricane Hugo. These people haven't had TV since September. I was
ready to kill for basketball scores, having to wait the next day for a
paper or hoping that the radio would announce something.
Anyway, I also ran across a little blurb in the paper about the
Steelers hiring and then firing someone in one day. Anyone have
details? What was it all about?
Tanks, mon. (God, I was there too long...nah)
--dan'l
|
18.322 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Mar 19 1990 12:10 | 11 |
| They hired a new coach to be the linebacker coach, since they promoted
the previous LB coach to Defensive Coord to take over for Rod Rust.
They found out this new coach wasn't an assistant coach at school
X (which he'd claimed), but rather, he was the new head coach at
another school. He claimed all he had was a verbal agreement, his
new school claimed that not only was he under contract but he had
also been recruiting. The Steelers then said thanks, but no thanks.
His school didn't exactly want him back, but with it being so late
in the recruiting season, decided to stick with him.
John
|
18.323 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Mon Mar 19 1990 13:09 | 3 |
|
His new school is USF. He'd better have a great season, or he'll
be gone Jan 1.
|
18.324 | Noll was on drugs. | SHALOT::MEDVID | Rita Hayworth gave good face | Mon Apr 23 1990 10:31 | 22 |
| First question: What was the deal that gave Dallas our first round pick
and put us at 21st?
Second question: What have they done?
1st round: Eric Green, TE, Liberty - OK, I can see where Brister needs
more protection, so if this guys a good blocker, it's an OK pick at
best.
2nd round: Kenny Davidson, DE, LSU - Have no idea who this guy is. ESPN
commentator said he was a late round pick in his opinion.
3rd round (A): Neal O'Donnell, QB, Maryland - Maybe a sleeper. Won't
get to play for about five years.
3rd round (B): Craig Veasey, DL Houston - Good?
4th round: Chris Calloway, WR, Michigan - Good?
5th round: Barry Foster, RB, Arkansas - A good backup maybe.
|
18.325 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | JunkFergNotener | Mon Apr 23 1990 11:04 | 11 |
| Green is supposed to be a good blocker AND a good reciever.
Saw some footage of his college play on ESPN yesterday and he's
fast for as big as he is, he's also supposed to have great hands,
catches anything remotely near him, so I heard.
as for the rest, Hell I don't know what the hell they're doing.
Not reading the same program as the rest of the NFL.
JaKe
|
18.326 | | COOKIE::SIMON | | Mon Apr 23 1990 13:25 | 7 |
| The scouting report on Green sounds a lot like that on Benny Cunningham
a number of years ago; I hope Green turns out better than just an
average player.
re: .324 - I don't know either what the Dallas deal was, since neither
USA Today nor the Colorado Springs G-T had any details. Can any help
us?
|
18.327 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Nazz 5, DrM 3 = How low can I go ? ... | Mon Apr 23 1990 13:55 | 6 |
| I wonder about the pick because of the system. Green was rated as
the best TE in the draft, and has a ton of talent. But Noll's use
of the TE is neolithic at best.
In Noll's system, even a Kellen Winslow would have caught 20 passes
a season ...
|
18.328 | Not a bad move by Steelers | DEC25::MCFALL | We got a hot crustacean band! | Mon Apr 23 1990 14:44 | 8 |
|
Looks like Dallas gave Pittsburgh the last pick of the third round
for the privilege of switching from 21st to 17th in the first round. If the
Steelers really wanted Green all along, they picked up an extra pick in a
deep draft simply by waiting. There were no DL available at their spot in the
draft left that were worth a #1 pick.
Jim M
|
18.329 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | JunkFergNotener | Mon Apr 23 1990 15:01 | 15 |
| Word on the radio here in Pittsburgh today has it that Noll is giving
Joe "Flinging boogers on the" Walton a fairly free hand with the
offense. They plan to go with a number of sets that use 2 tight ends
and Green fits in as one of them.
As for Noll and the trade, this is the first time since Noll came to
the Steelers that they have traded the first round pick in any way.
Also, the Steelers said they were addressing specific needs this year
in the draft, instead of the old "best athlete available".
Sure hope things work out.
JaKe
|
18.330 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Apr 23 1990 15:16 | 8 |
| According to the Patriots representatives in New York yesterday,
the Jets fans in attendance started chanting "Joe must go!" whenever
it was time for the Steelers to make a pick.
They were also chanting, "Flutie, Flutie, Flutie" when it was time
for us to draft.
John
|
18.331 | Boogers | SHALOT::MEDVID | Rita Hayworth gave good face | Mon Apr 23 1990 15:34 | 6 |
| >chanting "Joe must go!" whenever it was time for the Steelers to make a pick.
^^^ ^^^^
Pun intended?
--dan'l
|
18.332 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | Yanks and Jets in 1990! | Tue May 01 1990 15:19 | 3 |
| Hey JaKe, how'd you like that WALTON_EFFECT(tm) draft?
JoJ
|
18.333 | Where are they going?????????? | PFSVAX::JACOB | JunkFergNotener | Tue May 01 1990 15:29 | 12 |
| JoJ
As far as I see it, the Steeler draft sips penicular appendage this
year. Watched a few tapes of 1st round TE Eric Green a few days ago
and the guy catches the ball and looks for a place to fall down. He
doesn't even try to tack on some yardage after the catch. Somebody'll
have to put their toe up his habeus_rectumus(tm) and get him to think
"run with the damn ball after you catch it."
As for the rest of the draft, Hoover city.
JaKe
|
18.334 | Sam Knows Tight Ends | SHALOT::MEDVID | Words are very unnecessary... | Wed May 02 1990 10:15 | 12 |
| Sam Rutigliano (sp?) was in Charlotte the other night. I was talking
to the owner of a pizza place here in Charlotte who's a good friend of
his.
Sam is now coaching at Liberty where Eric Green has been playing his
college ball. Sam told our mutual friend that Green is the best tight
end he has *ever* coached, including Ozzie Newsome. Prepare to be
impressed is what I say.
But I agree, the rest of the picks are nuts.
--dan'l
|
18.335 | | IAMOK::AHEARN | Rams vs. Bengals in SB XXV | Wed May 02 1990 12:16 | 15 |
| Given the major role that the tight end plays in Joe Walton's offense,
it's not that surprising that they used their #1 pick in the draft to
get the best TE in it. If Green is as good as Rutigliano claims, he
could post some awesome stats in years to come. Mickey Shuler, a good
tight end, has benefited greatly by playing in Walton's offense over
the years.
Conversely, Pittsburgh has not utilized the TE in their passing game
for YEARS!! Thus, it's likely Noll(sp?) and Walton felt that the current
TE's on the roster would not be able to excel in the newly introduced
offensive schemes....thus creating the need to get a TE early in the
draft.
Nelly
|
18.336 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | Yanks and Jets in 1990! | Wed May 02 1990 13:18 | 3 |
| You caint excape from the WALTON_EFFECT(tm)
JoJ
|
18.337 | | CAM::WAY | There's no winners...only survivors | Wed May 02 1990 13:29 | 8 |
18.338 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | JunkFergNotener | Tue May 15 1990 18:49 | 34 |
| Steeler's 1990 schedule
--------- ---- --------
Sun Sept 9 at Clevescum
Sun Sept 16 HOUSCUM
Sun Sept 23 at L.A. Raiders
Sun Sept 30 MIAMI
Sun Oct 7 SAN DIEGO
Sun Oct 14 at Denver
Sun Oct 21 at San Francisco
Mon Oct 29 L.A. RAMS
Sun Nov 4 ATLANTA
Sun Nov 11 Open Date
Sun Nov 18 at Sinsinati
Sun Nov 25 at N.Y. Jests
Sun Dec 2 SINSINATI
Sun Dec 9 NEW ENGLAND
Sun Dec 16 at New Orleans
Sun Dec 23 CLEVESCUM
Sun Dec 30 at Houscum
Jan 13 Playoffs
Jan 20 " "
Jan 27 Super Bowl
This is the complete 1990 Steelers schedule, opponents for the last 3
dates will be determined later.
JaKe
|
18.340 | Time for a reality check | LUNER::BROOKS | If I were you,I'd take precautions... | Tue May 15 1990 20:39 | 37 |
|
re .338
Steeler's 1990 schedule
--------- ---- --------
Sun Sept 9 at Clevescum - Loss
Sun Sept 16 HOUSCUM - BIG LOSS (by SHUTOUT)
Sun Sept 23 at L.A. Raiders - BIG LOSS
Sun Sept 30 MIAMI - Win (in OT)
Sun Oct 7 SAN DIEGO - Win
Sun Oct 14 at Denver - LOSS (the Refs will get ya !)
Sun Oct 21 at San Francisco - BIG LOSS
Mon Oct 29 L.A. RAMS - Win
Sun Nov 4 ATLANTA - Loss (The Glanville Factor ;-)
Sun Nov 11 Open Date - The Steagles would lose if they'd play
Sun Nov 18 at Sinsinati - Loss
Sun Nov 25 at N.Y. Jests - Win (Somebody has to)
Sun Dec 2 SINSINATI - Loss
Sun Dec 9 NEW ENGLAND - Win
Sun Dec 16 at New Orleans - Win
Sun Dec 23 CLEVESCUM - Win
Sun Dec 30 at Houscum - ANOTHER BIG LOSS (Refs call off
slaughter after Moon's 8th TD pass.)
7-9 record at best
Jan 13 Playoffs Houston wins - JaKe weeps ...
Jan 20 " " Houston wins - JaKe attempts sucide
Jan 27 Super Bowl Houston kicks butt - JoKe is committed.
Hope this helps,
Dr Midnight
|
18.341 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | JunkFergNotener | Wed May 16 1990 15:25 | 8 |
| Hey Midwife, are you sure you and Whitehead aren't twin brothers.
Your blind optimism about the Oilslicks is in the same league as
Whitehead and the Brown(spot)s(tm).
Steelers will finish either 11-5 or 12-4 and take the AFC Central.
JaKe
|
18.342 | BOOMER AND THE BOYS RULE THE CENTRAL | EAYV01::ATHOMSON | | Wed May 16 1990 15:49 | 8 |
| HA HA HA
The mighty BENGALS will take the the central and go on to the Bowl.
As for the Steelers the BENGALS will kick there ass just like last
season.
BENGALS FOR THE BOWL 1991
BIG AL SCOTLANDS NO1 BENGAL FAN
|
18.343 | turn it around | LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Wed May 16 1990 16:59 | 9 |
|
Hmmmmm, I counted 11 loses out of those games.........
Bubble Breath (tm)
Signed.....THE WOLF GANG!
|
18.344 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | WHOA! Death by STEREO! | Wed May 16 1990 19:43 | 14 |
| Steeler's 1990 schedule
--------- ---- --------
Sun Sept 9 at Clevescum
Sun Sept 16 HOUSCUM
Sun Sept 23 at L.A. Raiders
Sun Sept 30 MIAMI
Sun Oct 7 SAN DIEGO
* SUN OCT 14 AT DENVER ( Bubble Blister (tm) goes down In:
Ig-no-min-i-ous De-FEET!!!!!!!!!)
Mike JN
|
18.345 | '90 schedule requested | SHALOT::MEDVID | Head Like a Hole | Mon Jul 16 1990 10:11 | 9 |
| Can someone post or point me to the '90 Steelers schedule including
pre-season games please.
I need to plan some business trips overseas and want to miss as few
games as possible. Hey, you gotta have priorities, no?!?
Tanks in advance.
--dan'l
|
18.346 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar panel for sex machine | Mon Jul 16 1990 10:36 | 38 |
| Here ya go, -dan'l:
Preseason:
Thurs Aug 9 NEW ENGLAND 7:30pm
Fri Aug 17 at Washington 8:00pm
Sat Aug 26 at Dallas 9:00pm
Sat Sep 1 PHILADELPHIA 9:00pm
Regular Season
Sun Sep 9 at Clevescum 4:00pm
Sun sep 16 HOUSCUM 8:00pm
Sun Sep 23 at LA Raiders 4:00pm
Sun sep 30 MIAMI 1:00 pm
Sun Oct 7 SAN DIEGO 1:00pm
Sun Oct 14 at Denver 4:00pm
Sun Oct 21 at San Francisco4:00pm
Mon Oct 29 LA RAMS 9:00pm
Sun Nov 4 ATLANTA 1:00pm
Sun Nov 11 Bye
Sun Nov 18 at Cincinnati 8:00pm
Sun Nov 25 at NY Jets 4:00pm
Sun Dec 2 CINCINNATI 1:00pm
Sun Dec 9 NEW ENGLAND 1:00pm
Sun Dec 16 at New Orleans 1:00pm
Sun Dec 23 CLEVESCUM 1:00pm
Sun Dec 30 at Houscum 8:00pm
Playoffs
Super Bowl
Home games in caps.
JaKe
|
18.347 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | At Dan's request... | Mon Jul 16 1990 10:40 | 1 |
| Hey Jake...the Jets are gonna crush the Steelers.
|
18.348 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar panel for sex machine | Mon Jul 16 1990 10:58 | 9 |
| Jo?
Why,
the............WALTON EFFECT.......................???
JaKe
|
18.349 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Jul 16 1990 11:00 | 10 |
| Please note - the preseason game with New England on August 9, which
you have listed as a Steelers home game, is only a Steelers home game
in name. The game is being played at Olympic Stadium in Montreal. I'm
going on the trip and in my talks with the Patriots last week to work
out some of the logistics, they said the promoters are expecting a
crowd of only about 20,000 people. If that's the case, someone is
going to take a huge loss on this effort. It also makes my guess of
Montreal as a possible NFL expansion site look pretty foolish.
John
|
18.350 | never been to Montreal... | CNTROL::CHILDS | King of the Swingers:the Jungle VIP | Mon Jul 16 1990 11:56 | 7 |
|
Jake, you're slaying me with your p-names.... ;^)
John heard of any intersting discount packages to attend the game and watch
the Steelers lay waste to the fading fast Pats?
mike
|
18.351 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | At Dan's request... | Mon Jul 16 1990 12:37 | 10 |
| re: Jake
Absolutely...the Walton effect will take control of what could be a
great offense and cause it to sputter and die halfway through the 3rd
period.
Too bad for Pitt.. They made a decent showing last year. I was hoping
they'd become a force in the AFC Central.
JoJ
|
18.352 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar panel for sex machine | Mon Jul 16 1990 12:57 | 7 |
| They Wil, They Will, They Will
excuse me, i was just skipping around here.
JaKe
|
18.353 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar panel for sex machine | Mon Jul 16 1990 12:58 | 10 |
| re-.1
they will meant towards your dominant force comment, not the sputter
in the third period comment.
JaKe
|
18.354 | | SASE::SZABO | Things are picking up! | Mon Jul 16 1990 13:23 | 3 |
18.355 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | At Dan's request... | Mon Jul 16 1990 13:28 | 10 |
| Just so ya know, Jake, I hate the Oilers, I hate the Browns. The
Bengals are ok, and the Steelers are ok except when they play the Jets,
then I hate them too.
So, if the Steelers go 15-1 but lose to the Jets, that'll be ok by me.
If ya know any hit men, put out a contract on that nose picker Walton
or your guys won't do squat this year.
JoJ
|
18.356 | Hey JoJ, CONGRATS! | SASE::SZABO | Things are picking up! | Mon Jul 16 1990 13:38 | 8 |
18.357 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar panel for sex machine | Mon Jul 16 1990 13:39 | 7 |
| Hawk:
I started losing my blond locks at the tender age of 19. The p-name
fits though.
JaKe
|
18.358 | Steelers in Camp! Gettin' to be that time again. | SHALOT::MEDVID | Head Like a Hole | Fri Jul 20 1990 17:26 | 9 |
| My friend just sent me the Post-Gazette articles on the Steeler's
Oklahoma Drills. Seems like Carlton Haselrig, six time NCAA wrestling
champ, destroyed all comers for the second year in a row.
Guess that don't mean much since he was put on the developmental squad
last year. But this year he has really caught Noll's eye and Noll and
Joe Greene are fighting it out over whether he'd be better on the
offensive or defensive line. (Bet Noll wins.)
|
18.359 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar panel 4 a Sex machine | Fri Jul 20 1990 18:23 | 13 |
| That time of the year is coming. Training camps, preseason games from
afar and JUNK NOTING GALORE!!!
The Steelers opened camp Wednesday.
They are said to be learning in camp how to play while wearing
toxic-waste suits because they have to travel to the mistake by the
lake, CLEVESCUM, on Sept 9th to open their season.
The Steelers will avenge the 51-0 debacle in 3 Rivers in week one of
last year.
JaKe
|
18.360 | The fish was thiiiiiisssss big | JURAN::MCKAY | | Fri Jul 20 1990 19:54 | 4 |
| Minor nit but how does one win 6 ncaa wrestling titles in four
years and has anyone ever won four, I can't think of any one.
Jimbo
|
18.361 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Mon Jul 23 1990 10:22 | 12 |
| RE: 6 NCAA wrestling titles
Maybe in different weight classes? I'm not sure. That's what the
paper said.
What amazes me is someone who never plays a down of college football
and can step right up with the pros. The Browns Sam Clancy comes to
mind. A story I heard out of last years Steelers camp was that
Haselrig was more or less moving these 280 pound linemen five yards off
the line of scrimmage with no exceptions.
--dan'l
|
18.362 | Can't wait to return to my real "home". | HEFTY::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Jul 23 1990 12:01 | 13 |
|
I can hardly wait, I'll be back in "real" football country by
the end of the week! Can't wait to see another group of Steelers
move into the Hall... This year should be pretty good with Lambert
and Franco!
At least I'll get to see the Steeler's once this year!
bill_g_who_is_the_only_Mass_resident_with_a_Steeler_license_plate_
|
18.363 | Gonna see every game this year. | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Mon Jul 23 1990 16:02 | 22 |
| Hey Bill, why don't you start your own fan club up there. I started
one here in Charlotte only four months ago and have amassed close to
100 members just by word of mouth.
We've already got a pizza joint in town that will show us the games and
put out a weekly Black and Gold news letter, gratis for bringing in the
business on Sundays.
I wrote to the Steelers and told them and the next thing I knew, they
sent us pennants, posters, etc. to decorate the place.
But the best item in our collection so far arrived about a month ago.
(Only true Pittsburghers will appreciate this.) I came home one day
and there's this box about 3 feet by 5 inches next to my mailbox. And
in it was one of the old Kennywood signs with the pointing (index)
finger that used to be all over town. (Kennywood for those
non-Pittsburghers who've read this far is an amusement park that
arguably has the best collection of roller-coasters in the country.)
--dan'l
President and Founder
Black and Gold Club of Charlotte
|
18.364 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Jul 23 1990 17:34 | 24 |
|
Dan'l,
Not a bad idea... It's amazing, but there seems to be quite
an interest in Steeler football up here in Patsy country. Most
of my friends like the Steeler's, but none really have the gutz
to were the black and gold.
As for Kennywood, I'll be stopping by in another week to give
the Thunderbolt another go... I'm kinda sorry to see those signs
go, but how do they tell people how to get there now?
As for the dish.. I guy in the plant is from Western Pa. too
and he has a dish and watches the Steelers and the Pirates, so I
could go to his house. My main problem though is the fact that
since I'm a basketball official, my free time in the winter is almost
non-existant. What little I have, goes to my family (unless the
Steelers are on!!).
And another general thing, I'd like to get my hands on a "terrible
towel" and a "green wennie"!!!
bill..g.
|
18.365 | Jack Rabbit, Thunderbolt, Racers, and even the little dipper | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Mon Jul 23 1990 18:36 | 15 |
| RE: Kennywood
When you go home, you'll see that the pointing-finger signs have been
replaced by arrows. Not quite as unique, but still as uneffective as
ever. Those signs, and signs to the zoo, are in the strangest places.
Drive through any suburb and you'll see one. But as with anything else
in Pittsburgh, there's no direct route anywhere (except to the super
bowl)!
RE: Terrible Towel
They stopped making the official ones. I'll cherish mine forever.
It's the official Myron Cope model. Yoiks!
--dan'l
|
18.366 | Pathetic, ain't it ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Send lawyers, guns, and money ... | Mon Jul 23 1990 18:37 | 11 |
18.367 | Ya never invited me to use your dish, so I had to. | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Mon Jul 23 1990 19:11 | 10 |
| > And to think that this sad little club doesn't even root for the best
> football team in Pennsylvania.
You're right, Bob. Everyone knows that the best football team in
Pennsylvania is...
Slippery Rock!
|
18.368 | Haselrig 6 gold 4 years | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Wed Jul 25 1990 19:02 | 23 |
| RE: .360
I don't remember the facts exactly but I believe Haselrig was a ncaa
division II or III wrestler. Before last year they allowed division II
and III wrestlers to compete in their tournaments and then wrestle in
the ncaa division I tournament. I believe that practice has been
stopped. If you need more precise information I will rumble through my
stack of old steeler digests.
Does everyone know about the weekly steeler digest. It gives good game
summaries as well as feature stories on players and coaches. I comes a
little late though unless you order priority mail. Unsually I get the
previous Sunday's information on Thurs., Fri., or Saturday. It could
be real nice to have this year with the new coaching philosphys for
the offense and defense(slightly revamped).
I hate the fact the steelers are playing the atl. falcons in Pittsbugh.
The last time the steelers were supposed to play in Atlanta the great
tickets that were purchased turned out to scab watchers. Of course I
could stand to scabs in the place of real steelers. Looks like I'm
going to have to hit the road to see them live.
Roy L.
|
18.369 | Steelers and Dolphins Digests | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Thu Jul 26 1990 10:58 | 9 |
| Hey Roy,
Check out the last regular season issue of Steelers Digest. In it is
the letter that got the Charlotte club started!
By the way, there is also a rag for the Dolphins if anyone is
interested.
--dan'l
|
18.370 | Another sellout | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Fri Jul 27 1990 18:20 | 10 |
| One more note before the weekend. Just got my weekly phone call from
my friend in Pittsburgh. Apparently the Steelers held a "non-scoring
scrimmage" (whatever that is) at a highschool field in Latrobe (where
Arnold Palmer drives his tractor). They sold over 12,000 seats which
is almost as much as have been sold in Montreal for the first
exhibition game against the Pats.
Those burghers do love their football team.
--dan'l
|
18.371 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Schizophrenic:HaventBeenMyselfLately | Sat Jul 28 1990 11:40 | 10 |
| to clarify .370, the Steelers held a scrimmage against the Redskins
where there was no kicking game. Each team ran 40 plays and the
scrimmage ended in a 12-12 tie. There were over 12,000 fans in
attendance in a stadium that seats 10,000. Either next week or the
week after the Steelers will journey to Carlisle, Pa, site of the
Redskins training camp for another similar scrimmage.
JaKe
|
18.372 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Tue Jul 31 1990 16:11 | 10 |
| Regarding Steelers Digest:
I'm an old time Steeler fan (all the way back to Bobby Lane, John Henry
Johnson etc). I now live in Colorado where we get very little information
on the Steeler's. In fact, this conference is the only place where I can
keep up with any Steeler news. Could someone tell me how to get a copy of
Steelers Digest ? Is there an address or phone number for me to start a
subscription ? How much does it cost ?
Keith who graduated from Baldwin High School in '67
|
18.373 | McKenna's Pub has Steeler fans | MPO::MCFALL | Takes more than hocus-pocus, babe | Tue Jul 31 1990 16:40 | 11 |
| > I'm an old time Steeler fan (all the way back to Bobby Lane, John Henry
> Johnson etc). I now live in Colorado where we get very little information
> on the Steeler's. In fact, this conference is the only place where I can
Keith, if you are in Colorado Springs, check out McKenna's Pub.
The bar on the main level there was showing Steeler games whenever they were
on, even exhibition games, if I recall correctly. I'm not a Steeler fan,
but noticed them at dinner a couple of times.
Jim M
|
18.374 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Schizophrenic:HaventBeenMyselfLately | Tue Jul 31 1990 18:49 | 6 |
| Steeler offices phone # is 412-323-1200. They could tell ya about a
subscription.
JaKe
|
18.375 | Steelers Digest and the Colorado Clubs | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Wed Aug 01 1990 10:52 | 24 |
| The number for credit card orders is 1800-334-4005.
Subscription price is $29.95 per year. There are also multi-year
subscription deals.
I can send you the order form if you don't want to charge it. Let me
know.
It really is a great rag. It's a weekly publication during the season
and is filled with enough information (usually around 30 pages) to
satisfy any Steelers fan far from "home."
By the way, there's an add in the preseason issue for video tapes of
the championship years as well as highlight films of the last few
seasons. If anyone is interested, I'll pass the info along.
Keith, there are two clubs in Colorado that support the Steelers.
There is one in Central City called the Rocky Mountain Pittsburgh Club,
and there is the Pittsburgh Colorado Springs Club. For more
information, call a guy by the name of Nick Neary (412/921-5408) in
Pittsburgh and tell him you got his name and number from me (Dan
Medvid).
--dan'l who graduated from Chartiers Valley High School in '81
|
18.376 | HOF yet? | COOKIE::SIMON | | Wed Aug 01 1990 14:05 | 1 |
| Has the HOF induction with Lambert and Franco Harris occurred yet?
|
18.377 | Might as well build a Steelers Wing at Canton | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Wed Aug 01 1990 15:33 | 33 |
|
It's this weekend (Sat., Aug. 4).
Franco Harris' Pro Record:
Seasons 13
Rushing
Att. 2945
Yds. 12120
Avg. 4.1
TD 91
Pass Receiving
Rec. 307
Yds. 2287
Avg. 7.4
TD 9
Named to Pro Bowl '72-'80
Jack Lambert's Pro Record:
Seasons 11
Tackles
Solo 985
Assists 456
Total 1441
Interceptions
Total 28
Yds. 243
Avg. 8.7
Named to Pro Bowl '75-'83
|
18.378 | Worley down | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Thu Aug 02 1990 10:39 | 12 |
| Tim Worley will have surgery on his knee that he tore up in the
Steelers Redskins scrimages. This is a big blow to the offensive
attack. He might be back for the regular season, but who's to say the
knee will ever be the same?
OK, Joe Walton, time to start earning your paycheck.
From what I hear, though, the Steelers two rookie running backs Barry
Foster (Arkansas) and Richard Bell (Nebraska) looked great in the Skins
scrimmage.
--dan'l
|
18.379 | Here we go again!!!!!!! | PFSVAX::JACOB | Take a trip and never leave the farm | Thu Aug 02 1990 13:55 | 11 |
| Apparently there is some comcern in Steeler camp that Worley's knee
injury may be more serious than originally thought. They said that if
there is ligament damage, reconstructive surgery could be necesary and
Worley would miss the entire season.
The Steeler's luck with #1 draft picks in the '80's is still
continuing.
JaKe
|
18.380 | GUESS I TAKE HAMPTON | COBRA::DINSMORE | whats your claim to fame.? | Thu Aug 02 1990 15:04 | 2 |
| so much for one of my picks in FFL
|
18.381 | Worley update | PFSVAX::JACOB | Take a trip and never leave the farm | Thu Aug 02 1990 18:33 | 11 |
| The Steelers announced that Tim Worley has minor ligament damage in his
knee. The doctor's suggestions for him are to let it heal by resting
it. He is expected to miss the next 2 to 3 weeks, which in
Pittsburghese for first rounders means he'll rest the knee for 3 weeks,
then completely blow out the knee on his first running play, requiring
major surgery and plunging his 40 yd dash time into the mid 5's
forever.
JaKe
|
18.382 | Steelers Signings? | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Fri Aug 03 1990 11:39 | 12 |
| Have the Steelers signed Eric Greene yet? I read where he had trouble
with his first agent so he got a new one only a few days before camp.
The new agent was from Pittsburgh and had never negotiated with the NFL
before. Is this the hold up?
Tim Johnson is another hold out, right? I bet he gets the Franco
Harris treatment. Remember "Franco who?" Harris then went on to play
a few more games for Seattle and retire. Chuck Noll knows when a
player has had it (except maybe for Stoudt and Malone who played far to
long in Black and Gold).
--dan'l
|
18.384 | Looking good | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Fri Aug 10 1990 12:14 | 14 |
| Good for Noll. Neil O'Donnell, however, signed the other day I
believe. That probably means Strom will not be wearing black and gold
much longer.
Steelers won their exhibition game with the Pats last night 30-14 and
we had over 100 fans at Picasso's Pizza in Charlotte cheering them on.
I can't believe I just started this club four months ago.
Barry Foster, (R) Arkansas, ran his butt off last night. What a steal
in the 4th round he appears to be. There will probably be several
Steelers running backs picked up on waivers during the pre-season
because they're real deep here and all of them have talent.
--dan'l
|
18.385 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | | Sat Aug 11 1990 15:01 | 10 |
| I was in Montreal for the game. The Patriots were awful. The crowd
was awful. We flew back right after the game and between not having
the plane at the airport when we were ready to leave, and having
only two people working at Customs when we got back, I didn't get
home until 430AM Friday. Not one word of complaint from the Patriots
players, however.
Bad though it was, it's nice to be back to work again.
John
|
18.386 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Aug 14 1990 19:12 | 53 |
|
Well, I have just returned from Western Pa. and I got up on
all the Steeler poop. As of today, their No. 2 pick was signed
and this leaves only Green, their no. 1 unsigned.
Rambling thoughts:
The city is basically split on what to do about the neverending
battle of the holdouts. Some side with the Rooney's and some side
with the draft picks. This whole matter has basically come down
to the fact that they are squabbling over 30K in salary with Green.
Some say that "these guys have never played a down of NFL football
and why should they get millions without having proved themselves",
while others say "that's the going rate and the Steelers should
pay it." My thing is if they are going to continue to do this with
their first round pick every year where they miss camp, then come
back and get hurt and are gone for the season, then I say trade
the pick and get another body. Noll blasted and I mean blasted
the 3 picks holding out plus Johnson who is also holding out. Noll
even when so far as to question the integrity of one of the Agents
(who happened to of played for the Oilers in the early-mid 70's)
around the importance of training camp and that maybe he (the agent)
wasn't ever part of a winning team....ouch! As usual, Noll is pretty
upset, but what else is new.
1st preseason game: Boring..basically, Brister stunk pretty bad
and the Steelers weren't that impressive. Sure they ran the ball
for over 200 yards and held the pats to 20, but the Pats are dismal
at best. The bright spots have to be at running back. The Steelers
seem to be loaded and it looks like there is going to be some tough
cuts down the stretch.
Hall of Fame induction: Once again, this was my highlight of going
home. Another huge group of people made the trek to Canton to witness
the induction of Lambert and Franco. The news really played it
up and had plenty to show about the crowd. They did some nice pieces
on the guys who formed "lambert's lunatics (they made the huge banner
of lambert that you used to see at the games) and Franco's Army.
Franco loved his army so much that he invited the founders to the
ceremonies to sit in the special section with his family. The clips
on the "Army" really brought back the memories! Most of all, the
fans were forgiving as they welcomed back Franco into the fold with
flying colors. At one point in the ceremony, the steeler fans chanted
"Here we go Steelers" for over 3 minutes causing Franco to stop
his speech and just listen. My only regret is that I haven't taken
the trip to see an induction ceremony live!
Overall, the Steelers could have a decent season if Brister can
deliver and if the front four can get some pressure on the QB.
bill..g.
|
18.387 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | stars come down in you | Wed Aug 15 1990 18:40 | 8 |
| Bill,
You wouldn't have taped the Hall of Fame Hoopla and inductions by any
chance? I told my father to tape it all for me, but as always, he just
can't grasp 20th-century technology. Basically my parents' VCR is a
$600 channel changer that has a clock constantly blinking 12:00.
--dan'l
|
18.388 | | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Wed Aug 15 1990 18:57 | 22 |
| Dan'l....
If you're folks are anywhere on the high side of 50, take heart.
That syndrome is rampant among older people. My parents are ahead
of the game, in that they can work with a phone answering machine,
and deal with a microwave oven.
It amazes them that cars use chips to determine their tuning.
VCRs are like the great Dark God sitting under (or on top of) the TV.
Only the high priests of today's technology (read that me and my
brother) can perform the all important ritual of programming it
to record.
They do know how to play back...which is a blessing 8^)
I'm thinking of starting a little business, called Technology
for Geriatrics, where I go around weekly and set up people's VCR's
to record and stuff for them.....
'Saw
|
18.389 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Is my character enough 2 be ... | Wed Aug 15 1990 19:11 | 7 |
| Bill, I think you're a good guy, and a class act.
So why don't you hop on the Oiler Bandwagon while there's time ?
Whatdda say ?
Doc
|
18.390 | $$$$$$$$$$ | SHALOT::MEDVID | stars come down in you | Thu Aug 16 1990 09:34 | 11 |
| RE: Technology for Geriatrics
Count me in. There's got to be a fortune in that. Imagine the money
we could make going around resetting VCR clocks every time there's a
power outage!
Saw, if you'd have come up with this last year about this time, we
could have retired by now and named all our offspring after our
benefactor Hugo.
--dan'l
|
18.391 | | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Thu Aug 16 1990 10:55 | 9 |
| > Saw, if you'd have come up with this last year about this time, we
> could have retired by now and named all our offspring after our
> benefactor Hugo.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA(tm)!
It would be nice to be retired, so I could play all day...
'Saw
|
18.392 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Thu Aug 16 1990 11:44 | 15 |
|
How come my kids can wire up any device in the house, and play such
mind racking games on the Ninento like 'Zelda' and
'Super-duper-ultra-mega-grandioso-goombah brothers, but I can't
teach them poker because "It's too complicated?" Go figure.
But then again, I can last all of 30 seconds on the simplest of
video games. My bo-dacious wife tells me it's the second shortest
thing I do.
Oh, and how about them Steelers, eh?
Dickster, feeling closer to the geriatrics than the New Kids.
|
18.393 | Modern tech ??? Let a kid do it ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Wyld Stallyns Rules | Thu Aug 16 1990 11:48 | 10 |
| Great p-name, 'Saw ...
And forget about any business designed to help the elderly with modern
technology.
My five-year old is a wizard with a remote control and I'm sure she'd
viciously undercut us "old folks" in price, delivery, and cuteness.
We'd be in Chapter 11 before we knew what hit us.
Bob Hunt
|
18.394 | | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Thu Aug 16 1990 12:38 | 15 |
| > Great p-name, 'Saw ...
Thanks Bob.
re Dickster and his shortest thing:
You, sir, are too much. Teach your kids poker, by all
means. And teach them to drink whiskey and chew tobacco and
how to spit properly when doing so...
Techno-whizz-weenies or not, those are things that every man
should know how to do....
'Saw
|
18.395 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Thu Aug 16 1990 12:50 | 8 |
|
> means. And teach them to drink whiskey and chew tobacco and
> how to spit properly when doing so...
Good thing they ain't girls, huh?
Dickster
|
18.396 | | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Thu Aug 16 1990 13:21 | 19 |
18.397 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Thu Aug 16 1990 13:37 | 5 |
|
'saw, stopo making fun of old folks, Lee might get urinated. Has he
signed up for your service yet?
Bruce
|
18.398 | | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Thu Aug 16 1990 13:47 | 18 |
18.399 | | CBROWN::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:05 | 5 |
| There's no way in hell I'd let a SportsNoter get near my house.
I got two single daughters over 18, and another who is 8. :*)
Lee
|
18.400 | | CBROWN::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:06 | 3 |
| Well, maybe A&W, and Karen, and Kristin, but none of you'se *guys*.
Lee
|
18.401 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:12 | 5 |
|
I think the two over 18 are safe from 'saw, but he asked me to ask you
if the 8 year old was cute.
Bruce
|
18.402 | | CBROWN::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:30 | 3 |
| Cute as a button, and my junkyard dog protects her all the time.
Lee
|
18.403 | Back to the Steelers | SHALOT::MEDVID | stars come down in you | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:53 | 13 |
| Back to the Steelers:
They play at Washington tomorrow at 8:00 PM.
Then they're at Dallas next Saturday at 9:00 PM.
Are they gonna win? Yes, if the defense keeps playing like they have.
And Noll more or less said that if the holdouts continue much longer,
those guys will not make the team. Has any other team ever cut their
number one pick due to hold out?
--dan'l
|
18.404 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Thu Aug 16 1990 15:14 | 14 |
18.405 | Apologies for digressing but I had to clear my name... | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Thu Aug 16 1990 15:38 | 25 |
| > When my kid was five, his Grandmother asked him why he liked to go
> camping with me so much.
> Nice and innocent, he says ` cause we drink beer, spit, say shit, and
> get to pee in the fire'.
> The old dudette almost went into cardiac arrest.
Gotta love it.
re Junkyard Dogs:
When you raise a wolf, there ain't much in the canine world
that'll scare ya. 8^)
re Bruce:
Gee Bruce, I thought young-uns was all the rage in California....8^)
^^^^^^^^^^
re Lee's Daughters...
Unless any or all of them: Drink Jack Daniels, Shoot shotguns,
love motorcycles, and think that Jimi Hendrix is GOD, I'm
not interested 8^) ;^)
'Saw
|
18.406 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu Aug 16 1990 15:39 | 9 |
| They won't be cut but they will be put into some sort of special
category which means they'll remain Pittsburgh property until the next
draft and don't count against the roster, unless they sign between now
and the next draft. The last prominent player to do this was Bo
Jackson when he was signed by Tampa Bay but refused to report. He
remained Tampa Bay property until the Raiders drafted him in the next
draft but didn't count on the Tampa Bay roster.
John
|
18.407 | | JUPITR::PARTEE | Charlie -- Lemieux est le mieux | Thu Aug 16 1990 19:01 | 19 |
|
Standard procedure for Noll. He won't cut off his nose to spite
his face. He won't cut them (or sideline them).
For instance, a few years ago, he said that Woodson had missed so
much camp (and eventually some of the season) that he wouldn't even
be able to make the team. Woodson played in the first and second
games after he signed and started the third game.
When Franco was holding out, he answered queries from reporters
about the situation by saying, "Franco Who?"
Chuck just gets a little urinated when they miss camp and the
rhetoric gets a little warm...
Charlie
|
18.408 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Aug 17 1990 18:01 | 19 |
|
re: .387
Dan'l, sorry to say, I didn't tape the show.. My parents VCR
doesn't blink on 12:00, it just sits there with --:--! To make
matters worse, they only have one blank tape and it was to late
to run out and get another. But, it was a great show if you were
a Steeler fan!
re: doc
Sorry doc, but the Oilers aren't my cup of tea..How could I
ever root for a team that encouraged their fans to bring little
miniture lassos to a game and swing them around..and to top that,
have "baby blue" as a team color.. No thanks, I stick with the
black and gold!
bill..g.
|
18.409 | Actually, I loved the Terrible Towels ... | EARRTH::BROOKS | A radical thinker on a musical level | Mon Aug 20 1990 11:49 | 7 |
| re .408
Minature lassos ???? Nah, the worse we ever did was usethose blue and
white pom-poms.
Seems like they worked pretty well in the Dome.... unlike those
Black&Gold snotrags you guys used to wave .... :-)
|
18.410 | Let there be Light - I meant I.C. Light | SHALOT::MEDVID | stars come down in you | Mon Aug 20 1990 18:14 | 45 |
| I thought you Steelers fans would be interested in this little
blaspheme I whipped up for the next Charlotte Black and Gold Club news
letter:
The History of the Pittsburgh Black and Gold Club of Charlotte
In the beginning Art Rooney created the Steelers. And the Steel-
ers were without form, and void; and darkness was upon the city
of Pittsburgh.
And Art said, Let there be Chuck Noll: and there was Chuck
Noll. And Art saw the light reflecting off of four Super Bowl
trophies, that it was good.
But then many Pittsburghers divided, leaving their city for far
away lands. One such land was Charlotte, North Carolina. And the
Pittsburghers were lonely and there was darkness again.
So the Pittsburghers created a club. And the club was shapeless
until Picasso's Pizza at Providence Square brought forth a
satellite dish, hereby yielding much sales of pizza and beer.
And the fans were blessed and were fruitful and did multiply.
And the fans did love being with one another, though the Televi-
sion Gods were showing the games in the fans' own living rooms.
Indeed, the fans did love this club so much they did fill Pi-
casso's at Providence Square. And Picasso's said, Let there be
two locations to host the greatest fans in the world.
And thus is born the Pittsburgh Black and Gold Club of Char-
lotte. They meeteth for every Steelers game at Picasso's Pizza
at Providence Square and at Central Avenue.
And all is good and the Browns are still scum.
|
18.411 | Hemingway,Dunbar,Baldwin,Charlotte Black&Gold | EARRTH::BROOKS | A radical thinker on a musical level | Mon Aug 20 1990 18:24 | 4 |
|
> And all is good and the Browns are still scum.
That is the most beautiful piece of prose I've ever read.
|
18.412 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Aug 20 1990 18:26 | 4 |
| And with all the fans loving each other and being fruitful and
multiplying, it sounds like a very, very interesting group.
John
|
18.413 | Kosar wouldn't be interested | SHALOT::MEDVID | stars come down in you | Mon Aug 20 1990 18:31 | 7 |
| > And with all the fans loving each other and being fruitful and
> multiplying, it sounds like a very, very interesting group.
We even have ladies in the group that DON'T look like bowling pins.
Makes for a fun evening.
--dan'l
|
18.414 | | HEFTY::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Aug 20 1990 18:34 | 19 |
|
re: Doc
Doc, you call yourself a Oiler fan and yet you don't remember
those little ropes they tried to push on the fans? Of course, that
was before "houston oilers, houston oilers #1" song, and the arrival
of Earl with the blue and white pom poms. It was a monday night
game and the steelers killed the oilers something like 31-3 and
Ernie "Fats" Holmes said that the fans were so upset that they started
throwing those little ropes onto the field in the 4th quarter!
As for those "snot-rags" you were talking about, it seems as
though they provided the "magic" for 4 suberbowls. Which is 4 more
than all the blue in texas could or ever will bring! Now with "booger
Joe" Walton controlling the offense, maybe it's time to bring back
the snot-rags?
bill..g.
|
18.415 | Not from what I've seen | SHALOT::MEDVID | stars come down in you | Mon Aug 20 1990 18:40 | 15 |
| > Now with "booger
> Joe" Walton controlling the offense, maybe it's time to bring back
> the snot-rags?
Why, bill, so we can cry? The offense looks more confused than
anything else. If it weren't for the running game they have going for
them, the Steelers would be in terrible shape.
Bubby doesn't look sharp and the receivers...well.
And Randy Wright has got to go, and I mean NOW!
--dan'l
|
18.416 | | 29310::JACOB | Bald Head=solar panel 4 sex machine | Mon Aug 20 1990 18:48 | 6 |
| The offense will settle down in a couple of weeks, just in time to
thrash the Brown(spot)s(tm) in the season opener.
JaKe
|
18.417 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Aug 21 1990 17:06 | 20 |
|
re: -2
The offense will be O.K., it just takes time. But, I gotta
admit that Brister has me worried. He doesn't look good at all
and I really can't understand why a QB would have trouble adjusting
to an offense that depends on him to throw more, unless a QB can't
throw to begin with.
The steeler's since Noll has taken over, have always had a strong
running game. Noll believes in controling the game with the run,
so the passing game will always take a backseat while Noll is around.
Re: Jake
Any new news on Green signing? What's the latest news from
camp?
bill..g.
|
18.418 | Bubby needs some time to study the books | SHALOT::MEDVID | stars come down in you | Tue Aug 21 1990 17:30 | 16 |
| JaKe is on vacation (and spending it in a great location too, Three
Rivers and Kennywood).
Actually, I read where Brister said Walton's receiver patterns were
confusing the hell out of him.
Apparantly Green and the Rooney's are about $30,000 apart and neither
is budging. And as long as Malarky keeps playing well, there's no
reason for the Rooney's to blink.
Like I said over in the Pats note, they could trade Green's rights and
get two first rounders next year. We got what we need this year.
Ain't no one player gonna make Pittsburgh's schedule any easier. It's
a rough one.
--dan'l
|
18.419 | | CAM::WAY | Barely 17 and we were barely dressed | Tue Aug 21 1990 17:50 | 9 |
|
> Actually, I read where Brister said Walton's receiver patterns were
> confusing the hell out of him.
If Bubby jams one finger up his nose and then looks at the patterns
they'll make more sense. Wif one finger up your nose, one eye sees
stronger than the other....8^)
'Saw
|
18.420 | "Here, let me hold the cellar door open for you" - Jooe Walton | SHALOT::MEDVID | Force is Machine | Mon Aug 27 1990 15:06 | 17 |
| The Steelers look really bad with only one week left in exhibition.
No pass rush.
No air attack.
No QB protection.
In the game against Dallas Saturday, all they did was throw the ball.
I guess since they're up to their necks in quality running backs, they
decided to use the game to work out the kinks in the passing game.
Well, they need to work harder.
The Steelers played like shit and I really don't think it's any one
player's fault. Perhaps there is something to this Walton effect.
--dan'l
|
18.421 | A message for Walton | SHALOT::MEDVID | Force is Machine | Mon Sep 03 1990 21:22 | 11 |
| At the Steelers' game Saturday against the Eagles at Three Rivers, a
fan hung a sign that said:
J?E!
Where's the O?
The Steelers ended up beating Philly, though the ground attack was the
major reason. The passing and receiving are still suspect.
--dan'l
|
18.422 | Review and Cut | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Tue Sep 04 1990 19:16 | 26 |
| I got my first opportunity to see the steelers this weekend and I sort
of see both ends of the spectrum. I running game did look real good
and maybe that will be enough to hold on to until the pass game
arrives. The run defense also looked awesome but does philly really
have a running attack???? The pass defense got burned for a couple of
big plays(which could be enough to lose any game if you don't have any
offense), but all the other pass coverage looked good. I saw a lot of
gang tackling.
Anybody know what the word is on Delton Hall? He looked ferocious
during his rookie season but since he hurt his had he doesn't seem to
have that same kind of pop. He also got burned by Mike Quick saturday.
I was suprised to see Rodney Carter released but I guess the steeler
wealth is at running back for a change. Here's this list of those cut
from the steeler roster from the Atlanta Journal Constitution:
Rodney Carter, Weegie Thompson, Mark Stock and Lorenzo Davis wide
receivers; Billy Griggs, tight end; Tim Tyrell and Kimble Anders,
running backs; Darryl Holmes and Billy Owens, safties; Richard
Shelton, cornerback; Eddie Miles, linbacker, and John Buddenburg,
offensive tackle.
I start drooling just thinking about Sunday opening day!!!
Roy L.
|
18.423 | Revenge is Key | PFSVAX::JACOB | Send a selfabused stomped antelope... | Wed Sep 05 1990 09:09 | 5 |
| The Steelers will avenge the 51-0 debacle of last year against the
Brown(spot)s(tm) this weekend.
JaKe
|
18.424 | and Kiam can't give them away | CNTROL::CHILDS | and the wind it cried Mary.. | Wed Sep 05 1990 10:30 | 10 |
|
Just a quick note on Steelers loyality. Last week at a bankruptcy auction
they auctioned off 14 Steelers Tickets worth a total of 2,000.00+ bucks
for 21,000.00+ bucks! One set of 4 endzone seats worth 720.00 brought in
6,000.00+ bucks.....
I haven't heard much Hoge lately he is ok and will be starting this sunday
right?
mike
|
18.425 | Delton Hall, a harder hitting Harvey Clayton | SHALOT::MEDVID | Force is Machine | Wed Sep 05 1990 14:39 | 20 |
| Beltin' Delton Hall never was good at pass coverage. But he is one of
the hardest hitters in the NFL. Just ask Webster Slaughter. He has,
in my opinion, never gotten better. But at the same time, he has never
gotten worse. I don't think having an intimidator on the field is
worth giving up a big play, however. Hall should be second string or
specialty teams until he can prove he can play as well as he hits.
I don't think Hoge is injured. He played Saturday.
They didn't throw to their tight ends at all Saturday after throwing to
them all preseason. Is this a setup for Cleveland? I can see it now:
Cleveland after not being able to stop Hoge, Worley, and my new Steeler
favorite Barry Foster in the first half concentrate on stopping the run
in the second. Malarkey would be open the rest of the game. Now if
Brister can get him the ball, that's the question?
It will be a great game regardless of outcome.
--dan'l
first half
|
18.426 | Take a walk | SHALOT::MEDVID | Force is Machine | Thu Sep 06 1990 11:37 | 9 |
| Pittsburgh's first round pick and the only unsigned first rounder in
the NFL this year, TE Eric Green said he would rather sit out the
season than accept Pittsburgh's contract.
Fine, Eric. See you in the unemployment line in a few years.
The Steelers don't need you as much as you don't need them.
--dan'l
|
18.427 | | WKRP::LEETCH | Bruce Leetch DTN 432-7628 @CYO | Fri Sep 07 1990 10:30 | 6 |
| Er, uh, didn't Pittsburgh beat the Browns in their second meeting last year?
If so, why all of this talk about avenging the 51-zip wipeout?
Just curious,
Bruce
|
18.428 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Go Rochester Red Wings! | Fri Sep 07 1990 11:17 | 8 |
| re .427:
> didn't Pittsburgh beat the Browns in their second meeting last year?
Yes, 17-7 on October 15th at Cleveland.
py
|
18.429 | It's an issue of pride | SHALOT::MEDVID | She's not a surfboard anymore | Fri Sep 07 1990 12:05 | 15 |
| If you got beat 51-0 in front of your fans in the season opener, would
a 17-7 win in the rematch be enough to quell the vengence you seek?
If Mark Stock hadn't dropped that pass in the playoff game against
Denver, Pittsburgh just may have had a chance to return the favor last
January.
A win in Cleveland is all I'm hoping for. With the way the Steelers
pass game and pass rush has been looking, to expect a blow out is a bit
absurd...but boy would it be nice.
It'll be the game to see Sunday. That's if I survive the all-out
rooting for Virginia tomorrow.
--dan'l
|
18.430 | | WKRP::LEETCH | Bruce Leetch DTN 432-7628 @CYO | Fri Sep 07 1990 14:10 | 20 |
| Re: .429
Ack. I just thought that beating the Browns later in the season IN Cleveland
would be revenge enough.
Really, when you think about it, ANY AFC Central team playing ANY other AFC
Central team ALWAYS generates enough emotion and hatred (both fans and teams)
to flatten Iraq. There is ALWAYS some reason why you want to absolutely KILL
an AFC Central opponent. The problem with the AFC Central is that 6 games on
your schedule are guaranteed to be a grudge match and everyone beats up on one
another.
EVERY team has a heated rivalry with EVERY other team. As a Browns fan living
in Cincinnati, I know that both the Bengals and the Browns DETEST every other
AFC Central team (including each other). I'm sure Pittsburgh and Houston feel
the same.
Go Browns ;-)
Bruce
|
18.431 | Noll and Pardee in the parking lot - it just don't sound right | SHALOT::MEDVID | She's not a surfboard anymore | Fri Sep 07 1990 14:14 | 5 |
| Yes, Bruce, but in Pittsburgh this year, Houston won't be as easy to
hate now that Glanville got ousted. It will be like the post-Bum
Phillips years. Though that's not to say Houston will become a patsy.
--dan'l
|
18.432 | Oilers to sweep Steelers in 90 - Noll pouts ... | FRSBEE::BROOKS | I can make it 'mo better .... | Fri Sep 07 1990 14:24 | 5 |
| Don't fret dan'l ... when the Steeler fans turn up thr heat on Noll for
his incompetence, he'll whine about Pardee, just like he whined about
Glanville when the Oilers was applying those bi-seasonal a**-whippings.
heh heh heh ...
|
18.433 | Lets tell the truth....... | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Fri Sep 07 1990 14:29 | 14 |
|
Now, lets get things straight.....
The Steelers didn't beat the Browns last year...the Browns gave
them the game! The Browns had 7 turnovers in that game and to
only loose by that spread certainly showes me that the Steelers
didn't take it to Cleveland! The Browns gave them the game!
And thats a fact!!!
The Browns to dominate in the Dawg House!
WOOF! WOOF! WOOF!
|
18.434 | I knew it was going to be a messy week in this topic | SHALOT::MEDVID | She's not a surfboard anymore | Fri Sep 07 1990 15:20 | 30 |
| RE: .432
To use the words "incompetence" and "Noll" in the same sentence shows
your lack of knowledge and your intense jealosy, oh ye of no
championship rings. However, I will be the first to admit that Noll
was wrong in challenging Glanville. He shouldn't have done it. Noll
should know by now how to lose like a gentleman. But he has his
personality as do we all.
22 years at the helm of one of the greatest franchises ever, though,
says something about your "incompetence" remark. Let's see, how many
coaches have the Oilers had while Noll was at Pittsburgh? I count five
who couldn't beat the man. Still want to talk incompetence?
RE: .433
Mr. Moderator, please mark .433 as typical Cleveland fan drivel.
Amazing how Hal's mind works. (Was that a contradiction?) Steelers
turn the ball over eight times (I think, it may have been more) in the
51-0 opener and to him and everybody else (including myself) the Browns
destroyed the Steelers.
Browns turn the ball over 7 times in the second game, but does he give
Pittburgh credit for a win. No, Cleveland gave them the game. As if
all Pittsburgh had to do was show up. Hey Hal, something had to cause
those turnovers and the only other excuse you have besides the Steelers
is the Vasaline on Kosar's hands.
--dan'l
|
18.435 | | FRSBEE::BROOKS | I can make it 'mo better .... | Fri Sep 07 1990 16:40 | 22 |
| Whatever would Bernie being doing with Vasoline in his hands ???
Hmmmm .......
re Noll,
dan'l you started it .... of course I know that Chuckie will wind up in
the HoF for his accomplishments. But between 1985-88, the Steelers ave
been mediocre at best, and some of the fans had been calling for his
head. IMO, he seized on Glanville as a scapegoat to deflect the heat.
Noll is not the classiest of losers - but to his credit he doesn't lose
often, hence it doesn't show a lot.
But it is there (remember the "Criminal Element" garbage of the 70's ?
Was John Madden as tacky as Glanville ?), and when Pardee applys the
hammer to him this year, Noll will find a scapegoat. So will ole Wicky
Wacky Wyche of the Bungles.
Fotrunately, Pardee isn't that big of a target, unlike Glanville....
Doc
|
18.436 | What did I start? | SHALOT::MEDVID | She's not a surfboard anymore | Fri Sep 07 1990 17:41 | 34 |
| I started it?
> <<< Note 18.431 by SHALOT::MEDVID "She's not a surfboard anymore" >>>
> -< Noll and Pardee in the parking lot - it just don't sound right >-
>
> Yes, Bruce, but in Pittsburgh this year, Houston won't be as easy to
> hate now that Glanville got ousted. It will be like the post-Bum
> Phillips years. Though that's not to say Houston will become a patsy.
>
> --dan'l
What, in that reply, started something?
Fact: Chuck Noll and the people of Pittsburgh (.et .al) hated
Glanville.
Fact: Pittsburgh hated (and laughed at) Bum, and when they
canned him, it just wasn't the same.
Fact: Houston will not rollover and die like they did between Bum and
Gerry.
Then all of a sudden you come in calling Noll incompetent. Not a fact.
Noll occasionally loses his cool, but sometimes he has underlying
motives. Crazy like a fox he is. And he attibutes a lot of this to
his mentor, Mr. Brown.
Oh well, it's Friday and it's football season. That's enough excuse
for any irrational behavior.
Have a good one ya'll dudes!
--dan'l
|
18.437 | | WKRP::LEETCH | Bruce Leetch DTN 432-7628 @CYO | Fri Sep 07 1990 19:12 | 11 |
| Well, you can blame it on me too. I asked the innocuous question about the 51-0
drubbing and Pittsburgh's revenge.
I agree Dan'l, Houston without Glanville will be harder to hate. With Noll, you
hate him because his teams (for the most part) have been so damn good, you get
sick of your team getting its butt beat. With Wyche, he is so off the wall, you
almost feel sorry for the bozo. But someone like Glanville who *truly* is a
jerk and an idiot, it just makes it all the more sweet when your team
*destroys* them.
Bruce
|
18.438 | fact... BROWNS AFC CENTRAL CHAMPS! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sun Sep 09 1990 11:14 | 4 |
|
FACT - Houston Oilers have never won an AFC Central Division title,
although they've choked 2 of the past 3 years...!
|
18.439 | FACT | IAMOK::HEANEY | | Mon Sep 10 1990 10:44 | 7 |
| Fact - Browns have won the AFC Central Division title, but have NEVER
made it to the Super Bowl
But then again when was the last time a team from Cleveland has been
to the BIG game?
|
18.440 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:03 | 8 |
|
FACT - The Browns will make the playoffs again in 1990... how do I
know? They have the greatest success in making it into the playoffs
of any team in the NFL! FACT!
FACT - Browns 13
Losers 3
|
18.441 | Are you sure? | SHALOT::MEDVID | She's not a surfboard anymore | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:12 | 6 |
| I thought the Raiders held that distinction. Are you sure?
Maybe it's more like Cleveland has the greatest success in making it to
the playoffs and then choking on their bones. FACT!
--dan'l
|
18.442 | FACT | IAMOK::HEANEY | | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:14 | 4 |
| I would hope they have the greatest success in making the playoffs
because they are one of the original teams. FACT.
|
18.443 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:18 | 4 |
|
Greatest success as in highest percentage of seasons making the
playoffs... and yes, its the Browns not the Raiders... I'll check
and post the data tomorrow...
|
18.444 | that was one scary moment for sure | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Rochester Red Wings IL Champs | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:18 | 5 |
| Anyone have an update on the Steeler player who was carried off the
field just before halftime?
py
|
18.445 | DATA | IAMOK::HEANEY | | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:28 | 5 |
| Re .443
Please post how many years the teams have been in the league.
Thanks
|
18.446 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:47 | 14 |
| Browns have been active for 44 years, including their 4 AAFC years and
made the playoffs 1946-1955, 1957, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969,
1971, 1980, 1985, 1986, 1987 and 1989 (off the top of my head) for
23/44 or slightly over 50%. This is their 45th season. Browns win 4
AAFC titles and 4 NFL titles.
The Raiders have been active for 30 years, including their AFL years,
and made the playoffs I think every year from 1967-1985, minus 1978 and
maybe one or two others. If that's correct then that's 19 years out of
30, or close to two thirds. Raiders win 1 AFL title and 3 NFL titles.
I can look it up tonight too.
John
|
18.447 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bush says, 'I meant No New Texas'! | Mon Sep 10 1990 17:43 | 11 |
| re.444
Thomas Everett suffered a laceration of the forehead and a concussion.
He rode back to Pgh last night on the team bus and spent the night in a
local hospital for observation.
Defense looked great yesterday, Steeler O never showed up.
JaKe
|
18.448 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bush says, 'I meant No New Texas'! | Mon Sep 10 1990 17:50 | 8 |
| BTW,
If I have to watch Bubby's Mudder after every play this year, I'm going
to root for a real team like the patsies!!!!!!!!!1
JaKe
|
18.449 | | FSHQA2::JRODOPOULOS | Hey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ? | Mon Sep 10 1990 18:22 | 7 |
| Living in Texas I never really saw Walton when he coached the Jets, so
all the jokes about him picking his nose didn't really mean anything.
Now I moved to MA and in first NFL game here incredibly I see Walton on
the Steelers sideline picking his nose. What's with this guy anyway,
doesn't he get embaressed ?
|
18.450 | NAMES WILL NEVER HURT ME...BUT YOUR BONES WILL BREAK | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Tue Sep 11 1990 09:12 | 13 |
|
Bubble's Mom and Dad...I thought it was funny as heck. She
didn't know if she should sit or stand. I don't think she had any
finger nails left either. Welcome to the AFC Central Bubble Butt!
Bubble Butt is probably the most over rated QB in the NFL!
Did he ever go to acting school???
The Leader of the Pack..
WOOFMAN
|
18.451 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Sep 11 1990 09:31 | 27 |
| I was slightly off. The Browns have made the playoffs 25 of their 44
years, for 56.8%. They made it in 1946-1955 (4 AAFC titles, 3 NFL
titles), 1957, 1964, 1965, 1967-69, 1971, 1972, 1980, 1982 and 1985-89.
Their other title was in 1964.
The Raiders made it 15 of their 30 years for an even 50%. Their years
are 1967-1970 (1 AFL title), 1972-77 (1 NFL title), 1980 (won NFL
title), 1982-1985 (1 NFL title).
The Browns are not an original NFL team since they've been in the NFL
only since 1950 and only in existence since 1946. I didn't go back to
look it up, but I would have to say they have a higher playoff
percentage in terms of appearances than any other NFL franchise. The
teams older than they are the Bears, who have been in existence since
the beginning, the Packers, the Cardinals (likewise), Eagles, Steelers,
Giants (all since the 1920s), Lions (also from the 1920s), Rams, Redskins
(late 1920s/early 1930s). The only teams that may be close to the
Browns would be the Packers and Bears, and then again, you can really
only count the years since 1933, because the NFL didn't have a playoff
system until then. The Niners and Browns were both formed at the same
time. The Colts were formed in the early fifties, the Cowboys, Vikings
and the original AFL teams in 1960 and everyone else has been formed
since then. The Browns competition would be, besides the Bears and
Packers, the Raiders, Dolphins and Cowboys. I'll do more research and
drop it in later.
John
|
18.452 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | It was the blister.. honest | Tue Sep 11 1990 10:11 | 5 |
| bernice is over rated, brister will be back...
dinz
|
18.453 | Brister is an average QB. How is that over-rated? | SHALOT::MEDVID | She's not a surfboard anymore | Tue Sep 11 1990 10:19 | 9 |
| When was Brister ever rated highly? He lead the worst offense in the
NFL last year and is on his way to doing it again this year. Anybody
rating him highly on anything other than emotion and leadership ability
really doesn't know football too well. He is a good quarterback and
may someday be great, but he still has a lot to learn.
Hal, after you talk out of your ass, make sure you wipe.
--dan'l
|
18.454 | missiterpatation | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Tue Sep 11 1990 11:07 | 7 |
|
re: -2
Don't you mean, Brister will be *on* his back???
WOOF!
|
18.455 | Browns 3rd in that department.. but moving UP!! | SNDBOX::HAUSRATH | Too many projects, not enough time | Tue Sep 11 1990 11:17 | 9 |
|
I Believe the Cowboys hold the lead in playoff years vs. years in the
NFL at something like 60%. I believe the Bears are also slightly above
the Browns..
I remember seeing this info published in some rag somewhere, but I
don't quite remember where.
/Jeff
|
18.456 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Sep 11 1990 12:10 | 11 |
| I just did some checking. The Bears have been in the playoffs since
1933 around 14 times, the Packers 10 and the Giants 18. Those are all
still below the Browns' percentages. None of the older NFL teams is
even close. The Dolphins are the only ones who can give the Cowboys,
Browns and Raiders a run for their money, and they are probably also
only around 50%. They were consistently in through the seventies,
missing once or twice and were in through the early eighties, up
through 1985. At most they've been in 14 times which works out to
58.3%.
John
|
18.457 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his Lips...Know New Taxes!! | Tue Sep 11 1990 14:17 | 5 |
| According to a story in todays Globe, Punky Brewster is all upset at
the short passing game installed by new genius Joe 'pick' Walton.
According to Chuck Noll though, "the player will be gone before the
coach".
Denny
|
18.458 | It's the Bubby and Bobby show... | REFINE::ASHE | Bases r loaded & Casey's at bat.. | Tue Sep 11 1990 18:25 | 1 |
| Think Bobby Hebert would have a problem with Joe's passing game?
|
18.459 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Wed Sep 12 1990 10:19 | 8 |
| Cowboys have been in 18 times in 30 years, 60%. Then comes the Browns.
The Dolphins and Raiders have each been in 50% of the time, Raiders
15/30 and Dolphins 12/24. No one else is really close.
Then again, it's biased towards newer and successful teams anyway
because they have a smaller base to work with.
John
|
18.460 | | FRSBEE::BROOKS | I can make it 'mo better .... | Wed Sep 12 1990 12:38 | 7 |
| You know, I never really appreicated this nose-picking business about
Joe Walton. I thought (in true SPORTS fashion) Joe was caught in the
act once, and you guys blew it out of proportion.
Then I saw him against the Browns. My God !
Do you think Jimmy Hoffa might be in there ?
|
18.461 | dinz send me mail :-) | SASE::SZABO | | Wed Sep 12 1990 13:08 | 5 |
| Joe Walton is an amateur nose-picker in comparison to Neil Bush. You
wanna talk "digging for gold", man, this guy thought he had Fort Knox
hidden away in his cranium!
Hawk
|
18.462 | The Original Rubber Cement | CAM::WAY | Batman plays rugby...Robin plays softball | Wed Sep 12 1990 13:15 | 11 |
| Hawk, send me femail ;^)
You guys can have Bush and Walton. From what I heard, Sen. Alan
Cranston was harvesting some pretty big oysters last night during
President Bush's speech.
Also, the guy on In Living Color who does "This Old Box" must be
doing a pretty good job, if he's using it for adhesive on his
boxes....8^)
'Saw
|
18.463 | | REFINE::ASHE | Bases r loaded & Casey's at bat.. | Wed Sep 12 1990 14:05 | 4 |
|
Hawk, send me femail ;^)
What would the Lynne say? Maybe there is hope for Lefevelour....
|
18.464 | | FSHQA2::JRODOPOULOS | Hey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ? | Wed Sep 12 1990 14:49 | 2 |
| Hey, stop all this talk about nose-picking, its lunchtime, but then
again the local cafeteria is a reason to quit eating.
|
18.465 | Brister cowls | SHALOT::MEDVID | She's not a surfboard anymore | Wed Sep 12 1990 15:38 | 8 |
| Brister retracted his statements about Joe Walton's offense being to
blame. He got the classic Noll treatment right before he did this.
Noll said if the QB can't work the offense, we'll change the QB, not
the offense.
Sounds like Bubby is smarter than Bradshaw in dealing with Noll.
--dan'l
|
18.466 | | CAM::WAY | Batman plays rugby...Robin plays softball | Wed Sep 12 1990 15:48 | 11 |
| re .463:
Actually, Walt, that situation is getting better all the time.
The nice part about having rugby games in the Boston area is that
there's more opportunity to see her, since I have to be up that
way anyway....
I'll keep ya posted ;^)
'Saw
|
18.467 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Batman is queer | Wed Sep 12 1990 18:12 | 1 |
| Get this rugby talk out of the PittsburgH Steelers note!
|
18.468 | Robin and /Don wear Dockers.... | CAM::WAY | Batman plays rugby...Robin plays softball | Thu Sep 13 1990 11:23 | 4 |
|
|
18.469 | It wasn't pretty, but we'll take it. | SHALOT::MEDVID | from the bottom of my pencil case | Mon Sep 17 1990 09:58 | 46 |
| Pittsburgh's offense still hasn't scored a touchdown.
Walton has got to go. He has three...no four...really good running
backs: Merril Hoge, Tim Worley, Warren Williams, and future star Barry
Foster. All preseason they ran the ball down other teams' throats and
looked terrific. The season starts and they pass on first down, run
for two or three yards on second, and pass again on third. I just don't
get it.
Houston looked really bad. When Moon was on, his receivers dropped the
ball. When Moon was off, his receivers were the Steelers. I especially
liked the pass off of Givins' butt to David Johnson for a Steelers TD.
The officials handed the Oilers their only touchdown. The unnecessary
roughness call on Rod Woodson was bogus; most defensive players get
away with a lot worse. We didn't see a replay of the pass interference
call. And then to throw Lloyd out of the game for a tantrum was a real
hose job. What Lloyd did wasn't right, but 1) I don't think it was a
TD either, 2) I've seen players do a lot worse and not get tossed, 3)
the defense was pissed as hell about the way the game was being called.
But that only fired up Woodson. I've got to say he is one of the best
players in the NFL today. I have never seen a better tackler since
Jack Ham. How about that one on 4th down at the end of the game!
And did anyone catch toward the end of the first half where he whipped
an Oiler receiver out of bounds and turned to that same official?
You can tell exactly what he said, "Why don't you throw a flag on that
one too." The official gave him a mouthful, but Woodson got the best
of him.
Before you go accusing me of sounding like Hal, no, I am not proud of
the Steelers' effort. The offense stinks and the pass rush could be
better. Thank goodness for a great secondary (even the backups are
great) and Gary Anderson.
--dan'l
PS: TNT needs to get it's sh!t together. Skip Carey belongs in
baseball. He called the Steelers the Pirates twice last night. Pat
Haden is one of the worst color men I've heard. Never liked him in the
booth and never will. He and 2 Live Crew should never be allowed near
a microphone again.
Nice shots of Pittsburgh during the pregame, though. It's a beauty of
a city.
|
18.470 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Sep 17 1990 17:07 | 23 |
|
I would basically agree with .469. I too am wondering why the
Steeleres have all but abandoned their running game...what, no more
traps?
As for the passing game, I can't help but remember the early
days of Bradshaw when watching Brister. Although he is no Bradshaw,
and never will be, I wonder why he isn't being yanked like Bradshaw
was. I would like to see the other QB's get a shot. I wonder if
we are headed for another Mark Malone syndrome. Hayden did say
one good thing last night and that was about the amount of time
both teams have had to adjust to their new offense. What has Bubby
been doing all this time? He's had all spring, 6 weeks of training
camp with 4 pre-season games, plus 2 regular season games and he
still can't get it? Bradshaw was never THAT dumb! This guy is
a REAL Gomer!
Basically, the Steelers looked horrible. Absolutely no offense
at all. Moon was horrible and so were his receivers. All in all,
this game was terrible no matter what team you were rooting for.
bill..g.
|
18.471 | Wins do count even when their ugly | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Mon Sep 17 1990 17:35 | 37 |
| Ugly - adjective
Webster - 1) Extremely displeasing to the eye
2) Ill - tempered
3) Offensive !certainly as in offend
4) Rough
As much as all of those definitions apply, I love coming out of this
with a W. For all the lack of offense and great defense last week the
steelers lost. I only saw one preseason game (philly) and the steelers
looked head and shoulders above thier present performances. I know it
was preseason and maybe philly just doesn't have it either(evidenced by
0-2 record).
Play selection may have something to do with the failing O but the
offensive line appeared to do a poor job last night. The RB's were
often being hit in the backfield. Last years offense may not have been a
sparkling well oiled piece of machinery but it sure looked a whole lot
better. I hate to say it but I Joe's offense is committed to, then we
may have to give Strom a good look. In the Digest it suggested that he
grasped the offense preety good. Bubby still has a little homework,
scratch that a lot of homework.
The raiders haven't gotten much going on the offensive front either so
maybe the defense will hold long enough for the O to get started.
Poorly Ref'ed game Sunday.
Well I guess I can be happy with 50-50 weekend, I am a big Michigan
Wolverine fan. They clearly outplayed Notre Dame but lost the bottom
line. But that's another note.
Roy L.
|
18.472 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Little roller up along first... | Mon Sep 17 1990 17:39 | 6 |
| re .470:
Who are the Steelers backup QBs?
py
|
18.473 | AL D. HAS NOT FORGOTTEN THE IMACULTE RESEPTION | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Mon Sep 17 1990 17:46 | 5 |
| The Raiders just going to roll on over the Steelers.
Los Angeles Raiders- 28
Pittsburgh Steelers- 10
The Silver and Black attack is back!!!
|
18.474 | Raiders by 7 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Sep 17 1990 18:16 | 13 |
| >The Raiders haven't gotten much going on the offensive front either
>so maybe the defense will hold long enough for the O to get started.
The defense will be old and grey if they 'hold' long enough for
the offense to get started. :-) As far as the Raiders offense not
getting nothin going either, they racked up 326 total yds., 16 1st.
downs, and 17 pts. this weekend, compared to 124 total yds., 10 1st.
downs, and 0 pts. for the Steelers. The Raider offense missed the
first game, but they showed up yesterday, and they'll be ready come
Sunday. Should be a real good game.
Carlos
|
18.475 | Steelers Backup QBs | SHALOT::MEDVID | from the bottom of my pencil case | Mon Sep 17 1990 19:47 | 3 |
| Rick Strom
Neil O'Donnell (rookie, Maryland)
|
18.476 | Steelers by 2 | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Tue Sep 18 1990 20:00 | 11 |
| I heard one of the local announcer say on tv the other day that the
raider's road record was better than their home record over the last
five years. Somehow that sounds erroneous to me. I know that the
current raiders aren't quite the raiders of old(just like the steelers),
but that appears to totally buck the nfl trend. Think one exception is
SF but consider they have lost so few games in recent years.
If it is true I hope the steelers help perpetuate the trend.
Steelers 16(3 fg's, 1 td) Raiders 14(2 td's)
|
18.477 | | ACTING::MACGREGOR | | Wed Sep 19 1990 10:05 | 7 |
| Last year the Raiders were 7-1 at home and only 1 or 2 road victories.
Granted that is only one year, but I'm fairly certain that they
have 5 or 6 more victories at home than away in the last 5 years.
I like your prediction on the score, but it should be
16 Pittsburgh(3fgs, 1td) 20 Raiders (2fgs, 2tds)
The Wizard
|
18.478 | No O | SHALOT::MEDVID | from the bottom of my pencil case | Wed Sep 19 1990 12:00 | 3 |
| You must be assuming the Steelers' TD will be a defensive score.
--dan'l
|
18.479 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Rodney Hampton...ROY | Wed Sep 19 1990 12:39 | 7 |
| i hope they do score dan, i have them in my FFL. wheres your faith
man.. bubby and offense will come around
Jim
|
18.480 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Read Matthew chp. 24 | Mon Sep 24 1990 13:30 | 6 |
| Raiders rip the Steelers 20-3! The Steeler offense still hasn't
scored a touchdown this season as the Raider defense limited the
Steelers to a field goal. The Raiders scored two fourth quarter
touchdowns to extend their lead.
Carlos
|
18.481 | Who cares about the Steelers when you've got women! | SHALOT::MEDVID | from the bottom of my pencil case | Mon Sep 24 1990 14:45 | 13 |
18.482 | | SASE::SZABO | | Mon Sep 24 1990 14:57 | 7 |
| dan'l, when you get back home, be sure to stop by the Lobster Trap in
Haverhill on a Monday or Thursday night with those pics. I'll have a
few cold ones ready for ya..... :-)
Is this considered not on an "adult level", Karen? :-)
Hawk
|
18.483 | | CAM::WAY | Pez...Cherry flavored Pez..definitely | Mon Sep 24 1990 15:43 | 12 |
| > James Bond style means I had to be sneaky, not that I bedded these
> women and then took pics of them.
Sure, dan'l...and I'm Phil Rizzuto with a deal for the Brooklyn
Bridge from the Money Store....
Hawk, if Dan'l's pics look like they were posed, you know he's fibbin'! 8^)
hope yer having beaucoup fun!
'Saw
|
18.484 | Getting better all the time | SHALOT::MEDVID | from the bottom of my pencil case | Tue Sep 25 1990 10:16 | 7 |
| My trip (among other things) may be extended. I may spend a week in
the Turin, Italy office working on some code. If the ladies in that
office are as lovely as those who have visited Charlotte or those that
I saw this weeknd on the Italian coast, it will be difficult to keep my
mind on the work.
--dan'l (who wishes he had invested in a camera with a zoom lense)
|
18.485 | Sheesh, ain't life a bitch ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Wyld Stallyns Rules | Tue Sep 25 1990 12:15 | 10 |
| After he gets back (if he ever does), I think we'll have to organize a
few of the guys here in Charlotte to take Medvid out back behind the
dumpster and beat him upside da haid a few times.
This kind of boondoggling must stop ...
Then again, if you bring back some *good* photos, Dan'l, we'll cut you
some slack. Some of them "double" exposure ones, okay ???
Bob Hunt
|
18.486 | | SASE::SZABO | | Tue Sep 25 1990 12:17 | 3 |
| HA! I always knew you were a pervert, Bob! :-)
Hawk
|
18.487 | Was that you out in the bushes ??? :-) | SHALOT::HUNT | Wyld Stallyns Rules | Tue Sep 25 1990 12:29 | 5 |
| You couldn't have known unless *you* were watching, Hawk ...
Peeping Hawk ???
Bob Hunt
|
18.488 | Not me, baby. | SHALOT::MEDVID | from the bottom of my pencil case | Tue Sep 25 1990 12:31 | 14 |
| Boondoggle? Me? Bob, I'm hurt. I worked real hard yesterday and
today delivering this bland training. And there are no women in the
class. If that last factor were different, then I might be inclined to
call this a boondoggle...but to be stuck in a room all day with a bunch
of European men is not my idea of a boondoggle. (Nothing against the
European men...it's just that after this past weekend, my heterosexual
tendencies are stronger than ever...Know what I mean?)
Until tomorrow...
--dan'l
PS: Bob, I looked all over for your request but I guess the riviera is
too posh. I'll keep searching though.
|
18.489 | | SHIRE::FINEUC1 | | Tue Sep 25 1990 12:37 | 12 |
|
>> PS: Bob, I looked all over for your request but I guess the riviera is
>> too posh. I'll keep searching though.
Daniel,
What's the request?
Send me mail (ha ha). I have the feeling it may not be suitable in this
locker room.
rick ellis
|
18.490 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | from the bottom of my pencil case | Tue Sep 25 1990 13:19 | 9 |
|
Ain't it nice how I worded that to make you all wonder what it is Bob
Hunt wants from the Riviera?
Hint: It shakes and entertains you and everyone watching.
See ya.
--dan'l
|
18.491 | | SASE::SZABO | | Tue Sep 25 1990 13:32 | 6 |
| > Hint: It shakes and entertains you and everyone watching.
One of those little hula girls to stick on your dash and/or rear window
deck in your car?
Hawk
|
18.492 | | EDIT::CRITZ | LeMond Wins '86,'89,'90 TdF | Tue Sep 25 1990 14:38 | 12 |
| Back to the topic.
I seriously wonder how long it'll be before Walton is gone.
I mean, Pittsburg had a an offense last year. This year, they
haven't scored one touchdown, not one.
If I were one of the "powers that be," Walton would be gone
now.
The team must really be discouraged.
Scott
|
18.493 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Tue Sep 25 1990 14:45 | 3 |
| > Hint: It shakes and entertains you and everyone watching.
Singing jello?
|
18.494 | a serious situation! | COOKIE::SIMON | | Tue Sep 25 1990 15:02 | 5 |
| I haven't heard any Steelers fans taking a vow of celibacy until Pgh.
scores any (offensive) touchdowns, like the New Orleans fans did.
Unlike the Saints, that would have the potential for a long, lonely
autumn and winter (and probably through Spring and Summer until next
Autumn, and ... who knows).
|
18.495 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Sox Pen: Honey I Shrunk the Lead | Tue Sep 25 1990 15:05 | 11 |
|
Speaking of Joe Walton and entertaining things, I saw this item at the
checkout counter of a local store:
No kidding. Ya see, it's this plastic nose, and when you press it,
these little pieces of green bubble gum fall out of the nostrils. I
was seriously rollward. The name of the product is "Pick and Chews."
Too much!!
Dickster
|
18.496 | Flush Walton!!!! | MKFSA::LONG | | Wed Sep 26 1990 13:44 | 6 |
| Are there any rumblings in Pgh about getting rid of Walton?
I can't imagine this farse going on much longer before Mr. Knoll
sends some heads rolling.
Bill
|
18.497 | Steeler Fan mauled in Raider Land | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Wed Sep 26 1990 19:07 | 20 |
|
I read in the paper yesteday that there was a Steeler Fan mauled
at the Raider game in LA last week. He is in critical condition.
Apparently raider fans were throwing all sort of things ice,
popcorn, beer, etc. at him and somehow he ended up on the ground.
A 19 year old is being charged with assault with a deadly weapon
for kicking him in the head. The paper stated that kicking to the
head make the foot a deadly weapon.
I've been to Chicago Stadium for Vikes vs Bears game and Fulton
County Staduim for N.O. vs Falcon games in which there are always
rowdy fans. There always appears to be a fight or two when fans
get a little over zealous but I haven't heard nor see anyone come
close to getting killed.
By the way what is the climate like in Three Rivers Staduim for a
opposing teams fans outside of the AFC central? I can imagine what
its like for a division foe.
Roy L.
|
18.498 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Sep 26 1990 20:22 | 18 |
| The NFL and local authority has to hit hard in the case of fan violence.
Monday night Frank pointed out that the crowd was much more behaved
then their last appearance for a Jets game. Seems fans were starting
fires in the stadium. Then there is last year's Cowboys at Philly
escapade and the Denver at Cleveland fiasco. Three Rivers has been a site
for potential problems. The fact is, any and all stadiums have
potential for big problems.
Control of beer sales and exhibition of large numbers of police and
security can help, but it's swift punitive action on offenders that
sends the clearest of signals. American football cannot allow
uncontroled fan behavior. Too many lives are at stake. Events in
the soccer world show clearly what can happen when crowds turn into
mobs at sporting events. A 19 year old kicking another fan in the head
is more than enough spark for a major explosion. He would get little
sympathy from me.
BoB
|
18.499 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | I'm lost, But I'm making record time | Wed Sep 26 1990 21:10 | 16 |
|
>> By the way what is the climate like in Three Rivers Staduim for a
>> opposing teams fans outside of the AFC central? I can imagine what
>> its like for a division foe.
>> Roy L.
Actually it's pretty friendly, in fact the last Steeler game I
attended, I actually saw a guy offer a fan from Kansas City some
Kolbasi and cream for his coffee.
JaKe
|
18.500 | Barry --give him the BALL!! | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Wed Sep 26 1990 23:14 | 23 |
|
I forgot to ask in the last note but what's the deal with Barry Foster,
is he hurt. He looked magnificent if the preseason. While I believe
Merril Hoge and Tim Worley are good backs, Foster deserves a few
hand offs in the real season. The way the offense is going they should
be exploring every option. I am adding this no having seen the Raider
game.
Any offense minded info. getting to local Pittsburgh press?
RE: .498
You're right about the potential for mob violence at any major event.
Especially at an event where violent hitting and tackling is promoted.
I, being a defensive minded person love to see vicious but clean hit,
wouldn't began to think I would want to take part in an act such as the
European soccer match.
RE: .499
I'm going to move getting to a Pittsburgh game in Pittsburgh up on my
list of things to do. I got beat out by the scabs when the came to
atlanta a few years back.
Roy L.
|
18.501 | Foster is "special" | PFSVAX::JACOB | I'm lost, But I'm making record time | Thu Sep 27 1990 00:04 | 7 |
| Roy
Foster has been used mainly on special teams so far this year.
He did drop a pass or 2 also against the Raiders, though.
JaKe
|
18.502 | You've Got a Friend in PA (and he's probably in Pittsburgh) | SHALOT::MEDVID | | Thu Sep 27 1990 06:44 | 11 |
| Walton doesn't even use Hoge and Worley. What reason would he have to
use Foster. This offense is a fiasco.
I've never gone to 3 Rivers and not seen a fight. Of course this was
baseball, not football, and the fight is usually among Pittsburghers
themselves when some drunk gets out of step. What do you expect from a
town filled with Russians, Ukrainians, and all the other Hunky
nationalities? The blood naturally runs hot. (Ditka for example.)
Some of the friendliest people in the world, but don't piss them off.
--dan'l
|
18.503 | That's why they can't have monday nite games anymore | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:54 | 12 |
|
I've been to the Meadowlands 5 times and only once saw a fight, I've been
to Foxboro roughly 10 times and never have not seen a fight. I also ended
up in a fight at foxboro cause I had the audacity to root for the Colts
in the rain as the 18 point underdog Colts beat the Pats. The guy who
started with me made a big mistake because although it was pretty much
a draw with the two us getting in some shots his friends decided to jump in.
Unbeknowst to them I was there with a busload of friends so the odds were
like 40 on to 8, needless to say we won that one...
mike
|
18.504 | | SASE::SZABO | | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:58 | 6 |
| > .....Hunky nationalities.....
> Some of the friendliest people in the world, but don't piss 'em off.
Hey, I resemble that remark!
the Mad Hungarian.
|
18.505 | New England may be the worst in this category, too... | DELNI::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:19 | 21 |
|
I'm a pacifist Western Pa. hunky (Slovak), but I'd agree I'm probably
in the minority. When I went back to Pittsburgh last Thanksgiving for
the Pitt-Penn State game, it was kinda neat seeing people that didn't
otherwise know each other hugging and celebrating the liberation of
Czechoslovakia, which had occurred the night before. You don't see
that kind of thing too much anymore. No fighting that day...
As for fan violence at football games, up here in Foxborough the
Patriots are not permitted to have night games anymore, after
the much-publicized Monday night game against the Jets in the
late-70's in which (I believe) at least one person was stabbed to
death. Even the 4 PM games can get out of hand, as did the season
opener against the Dolphins this year. I haven't been back there since
1988, but unless I had a reserved seat in a friendly season-ticket
area, I know I'd never bring my kids down there. Way too risky. I'm a
season-ticket holder in the Fenway bleachers, and there's just no
comparison.
glenn
|
18.506 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:24 | 19 |
| Our Monday night history was with the Colts in 1972, Jets in 1976,
Colts in 1978, Steelers in 1979, Broncos in 1980 and Cowboys in 1981.
Most of the incidents took place at either the Jets game or the Broncos
game. I'm glad we don't have Monday night games, though I'm not glad
for the reason.
I'm largely immune from what goes on in the stands and parking lots,
though it's not hard to see what happens. Our stadium is out in the
middle of nowhere, there's nothing to do other than sit in the parking
lots and get tanked and for a Monday night game, people come right
after work. If the games were played at 7 (as they are during the
preseason), there wouldn't be that much of a problem because people
would come from work, park and go to the game. The 1PM games are
largely OK.
I think it's more a function of the stadium location than a function of
the people.
John
|
18.507 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:13 | 22 |
| Mike, I bet you really lost that fight. 8^) You can't compare
a regular season game at the Medowlands to one at Foxboro. The Giants
sell out with season tickets every year. The Pats are lucky to have
25K season ticket holders. A lot of the folks who go to Patriots games
go to one maybe two a year. They get tanked and look for a fight. If you
own a season ticket and have to see the same people eight times a year
the chances of making an ass out of yourself are less than if it's a one
day affair.
The section that Chap and I sit in is maybe at most 25% season
ticket holders, mostly near the front row. You can tell those who aren't
because they will generally act like an asshole. The Miami game is a prime
example. The guys sitting behind us were getting two beers at a time (at
$3.50 a pop) quite frequently. Late in the game they threw a cup full of
ice at a kid that couldn't have been more than 10 or 11 because he had a
Dan Marino shirt on. His father (who was about twice the size of any of
them) started to holler at them and they suddenly weren't so macho. I
was going to take the side of the kid's father if anything broke out.
Most of the people in the section who are season ticket holders haven't
caused any trouble yet, and I would be surprised if any of them did.
/Don
|
18.508 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes!! | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:27 | 4 |
| Same in my section /Don. We seem to get a lot of fans of the
visiting team for some reason. It's just good natured kidding though.
Never had a fight in good ol' 222.
Denny
|
18.509 | | GENRAL::WADE | Bye bye Ms. American Pie | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:42 | 15 |
|
Roy L.
I saw the film clip of the Steeler fan at the LA coliseum. He
was down in front with an issue of SI that had a full page picture
of Bubby Brister. He walked back and forth in front of the crowd
holding up the picture of Brister. Debris was raining on him. The
film clip didn't show the assault but it did show him unconscious
and the police hauling away the guy who assaulted him.
Mikey C.,
You rabble rouser you!
Claybone
|
18.510 | | SASE::SZABO | Capt. America, Batman, Slasher | Thu Sep 27 1990 13:08 | 2 |
|
|
18.511 | feeling older all the time.. | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Sep 27 1990 13:20 | 12 |
|
But Don I wasn't making any comparisions just stating facts ;^)
While you're incorrect about the fight, you are correct that it isn't a fair
comparsions because of the sellouts vs. the nots.
the game I talked about was 78 thanks John...
mike
|
18.512 | | COOKIE::SIMON | | Thu Sep 27 1990 17:31 | 12 |
| re: fan violence
The LA "fan" arrested for kicking the guy in the head or whatever was
just emulating his Raider idols (Atkinson, Tatum, and Hayes); once he's
bailed out he'll probably get an offer as a Raider DB.
Also...despite Mile High's reputation, especially in the South Stands,
I was really surprised when I went to the Denver-Pgh. playoff game last
year that there weren't any noticeable incidents, particularly with as
many Steeler fans there and while Denver was losing for most of the
game. In our section, at least, the Denver fans were reasonably
cordial.
|
18.513 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | I thought Mrs.Fields was OLD! | Thu Sep 27 1990 18:10 | 13 |
| re .512
I assume your 'emulating his Raider idols' line was an attempt at
humour.
I haven't read or seen anything about this incident - but what is
the whole story. Does this incident automatically make every Raider
fan a cold-blooded killer?
I'd venture a guess that there's been fights between fans at sporting
events since Athens played Sparta for the All-Greece Champeenship.
JD
|
18.514 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Jump back!!! What's that sound? | Thu Sep 27 1990 18:14 | 1 |
| Yo Jd. Carthage beat Athens 41-6 in the semi's so u is wrong.
|
18.516 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Two snaps, a twist, and a kiss! | Thu Sep 27 1990 18:36 | 11 |
| I went to the Pats-Oilers game last year, and I saw the police go after
people without any hesitation, but you'll still have to have fans act
as their own policemen. Late in the ballgame these two jerks were
throwing cups, and they had pointed edges. One caught me in the eye,
and hurt like hell. I ha d a fair idea of who it was, and being in plenty
of pain (fortunately, it passed quickly), invited the S.O.B. who threw
it to come on down so I could, uh, "express my gratitude" (KG).
No more cup, ice, or anything throwing after that...
As for the tailgate parties, that was a blast.
|
18.517 | Worley wants out--Give me a break!! | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Thu Sep 27 1990 18:42 | 24 |
|
From The Atlanta Journal Constitution Thursday 27, 1990.
Former Georgia running back Tim Worley has requested a trade, but was
turned down by Pittsburgh Steelers president Dan Rooney.
Worley asked for the trade through his agent, Harold "DOC" Daniels,
after he carried only three times for 8 yards in the Steelers' 20-3
loss Sunday to the Raiders.
"It's in ome and out the other," Rooney said. "We're not even giving
that any thought at all. We want to get Tim playing , get him in the
game and get him gaining 100 yards a game. That's our goal."
**********************************************************************
Is he kidding ??? If there ever was or will be a running offense it
will be in Pittsburgh. I should temper that with as long as Knoll is
there. Granted atheletes do a "different" type of job, but isn't one
game of under use being a short sighted. I only pray that one day a week
I was underused on my job. I guess he could actually be making a
statement of frustration to the offensive line for not having any holes
the first three games.
Roy L.
|
18.518 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Sep 27 1990 23:12 | 11 |
| I have attended many games at Mile-Hi and have yet to see any
disturbance. The crowd mood has not been the best after some
games but still not much trouble. Fans of any team visiting are
regularly seen in fact the Raiders' fans were in large number
last season. Of course most of them snuck out after 3rd qtr.
Most everybody is a season ticket holder though. Everybody gets
carded for beer sales even if your 50 and beer is cutoff after
the 3rd quarter. There are a lot of cops around.
BoB
|
18.519 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Sep 28 1990 10:01 | 1 |
| Get a life Steven, Athens won fair and square.
|
18.520 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | PGH Pirates, 1990 NL East Champs | Mon Oct 01 1990 16:44 | 13 |
| THE STEELERS OFFENSE SSSSSSSUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCKKKKKSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!
Somebody should take J_e "Where's the 'O'" Walton and his suck a$$
offensive scheme and his bull$hit play calling, dump them in some
cement and lay him to rest at the bottom of the Allegheny River beside
3 Rivers Stadium. The guy has outlived his usefullness in Pittsburgh
already. He Stinks. Oh Christ, I'm starting to sound like Wardle,
sorry.
nevermind
JaKe
|
18.521 | same (very) old Steelers! | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Oct 01 1990 16:59 | 30 |
|
The only thing worse than being a Steeler fan right now is that
I am living in New England and am forced to watch the other circus,
namely the Patriots!
Walton's offense can't be that difficult to learn, although
at this point, it doesn't look promising.
As for Brister, I wonder if Bradshaw has called him up and said,
"how does it feel?" As I was watching the game yesterday, I couldn't
help but think of the good 'ole days when the fans used to boo Terry,
but at least Bradshaw as smart or dumb enough to at least run the
ball when he was in trouble. But poor Bubby, another Mark Malone
clone! I just hope they don't stick with him as long as they did
with Malone!
Hey, I rather see them run the ball for 3 yards and a cloud
of dust then to try and execute this one run, one pass, then get
sacked on 3rd and 10 stuff! What happened to the old Pittsburgh
trap! They never trap anymore, and that was their trademark...
Best stat of the weekend:
Pittsburgh Pirates offense in last 4 games.....19 points/runs
Pittsburgh Steelers offense in last 4 games....18 points
bill..g.
|
18.522 | Miami vs. Steeler Stats | PFSVAX::JACOB | PGH Pirates, 1990 NL East Champs | Mon Oct 01 1990 20:29 | 39 |
| Miami Pittsburgh
20 First Downs 8
42-122 Rushes-yards 14-41
202 Passing yards 119
18-29-1 Comp-Att-Int 12-25-3
1-4 Sacks/yds lost 5-33
5-34 Punts 5-41
1-0 Fumbles-lost 1-0
5-40 Penalties/yards 5-50
39:46 Time of Possession 20:14
Individual stats
Rushing,Miami: S. Smith 20-48, Logan 8-36, Paige 5-10, Marino 1-9
Stradford 2-9, Secules 3-5, Higgs 2-4, Jensen 1-1.
Pittsburgh: Hoge 6-21, Worley 5-11, Brister 1-7, Strom 2-2.
Passing:
Miami: Marino 17-28-1-175yds, Jensen 1-1-0-31
Pittsburgh: Brister 7-18-3-76yds, Strom 5-7-0-76yds.
Recieving:
Miami: Paige 6-36, Clayton 3-51, Duper 2-26, Jensen 2-22, stadford 2-14
Edmunds 1-31, Martin 1-16, A. Brown 1-10.
Pittsburgh: Lipps 4-64, Hill 2-36, Hoge 2-16, Mularkey 2-15, Stone 1-11,
Bell 1-10.
JaKe
|
18.523 | ? | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | I want my Dish! | Mon Oct 01 1990 20:30 | 5 |
18.524 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | PGH Pirates, 1990 NL East Champs | Mon Oct 01 1990 21:11 | 5 |
| 28-6, Miami won.
JaKe
|
18.525 | Lay of Brister | SHALOT::MEDVID | | Tue Oct 02 1990 06:02 | 23 |
| Wait one minute!
What's all this Bubby bashing?
This is the same guy who last year woke up a dead team and lead them
within two minutes of the championship game. Now I haven't seen the
last few games, but to me it seems the whole offense is stagnant, not
just the QB.
I said it over in the Patriots note: Joe Walton has tried to fix what
was not broken. To use two powerful backs like Worley and Hoge as
little as the stats show...and to not use Barry Foster hardly at
all...what is going through Walton's mind?
Brister was the lifeblood of the team last year. This year, it is a
difficult job when you've got a coach on the sideline who keeps pulling
the plug on the life support machine.
The Steelers are in serious trouble, and to point at any one player on
the offense is not correct. Something is wrong with the total
offensive scheme...and we all know who's in charge of that.
--dan'l
|
18.526 | Go Joe! | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | I want my Dish! | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:04 | 4 |
|
Joe's the problem!
B.A.
|
18.527 | no "o" | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:11 | 1 |
| You mean "J_e".
|
18.528 | Why just Walton ??? | 34738::HUNT | Hey, Soup, like my node name ??? | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:17 | 13 |
| RE: 18.527 by AIMHI::DONNELLY
Why is Joe Walton on the "hot seat" in Pittsburgh ??? Hey, I
know he's the offensive co-ordinator but last time I checked,
Chuck Noll is still the head coach.
Noll pre-dates the use of Offensive Co-ords. Therefore, you
can't use the argument that he doesn't know "offense".
Walton is his assistant. Noll can override him if he wants to.
Evidently, he must not want to.
Bob Hunt
|
18.529 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Tue Oct 02 1990 16:06 | 8 |
|
Perhaps Bob, it goes back to when Noll quit over his assistants and then
returned and did what upper level management wanted. Maybe they wanted
Walton and Noll is letting them suffer with his inadequacies. If Noll
himself wanted Walton then what can you say except Noll has always been one
stubborn SOB.......
mike
|
18.530 | Boy, we sure miss Joe here in Jersey | PARVAX::WARDLE | Yuppies to dominate W.A.F.F.L.E. | Tue Oct 02 1990 16:21 | 5 |
| Hey PittsburgH.....
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA(tm)
JoJ
|
18.531 | "my comments were taken out of context" | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Tue Oct 02 1990 17:47 | 8 |
| RE: back a few
I never said Walton was on the hotseat. I don't know how Steeler
mgmt feels about him - or how Noll feels about him. I do have a pretty
good idea how most of the fans feel about him, though.
Walton's job is to put some points up on the board. So far, he hasn't
done it.
|
18.532 | Yunz can have Walt_n back! | MKFSA::LONG | | Wed Oct 03 1990 16:45 | 11 |
| JaKe
Thanks a bunch for the stats on the Steelers' last game. That is
exactly the kind of thing I'd like to see more of in here.
re: the last few..
Get J_e _ut _f Pgh! Remember Brister is n_t making the play selecti_ns
that's the _ffensive c__rdinat_r's j_b.
Beat 'em Bucs
Bill
|
18.533 | ^^^^^ | PFSVAX::JACOB | Four down and No O J_e | Wed Oct 03 1990 16:54 | 5 |
| ***personal name sung to the tune of Neil Young's "Ohio"!!!!!
JaKe
|
18.534 | | SUPVAX::KERMIT | halp, i'f falin an aye kant geddup | Thu Oct 04 1990 18:13 | 6 |
| Bubee briztr iz slee ping at 3 rivrs stadeeyum. Tha reezon, sumbudee
paanted gole poasts on his haus an he cant git within tenn yards
uv tha plase.
medammit
|
18.535 | Steelers win but pay a price. | SHALOT::MEDVID | Murky buckets, monsewer! | Mon Oct 08 1990 11:50 | 17 |
| Other than Gary Anderson, if someone were to ask me who the three most
important members of the Steelers are, I would say:
- Bubby Brister
- Rod Woodson
- Tim Woorley
All three were hurt in yesterday's game against San Diego. Rick Strom
is an able backup for Brister. The Steelers secondary didn't seem to
lose a step without Woodson, though the special teams seemed to suffer
a bit. Pittsburgh has quality running backs sitting on the bench.
So three of the stars were hurt and the supporting cast was able to
make a good showing. Not bad. Still, if these injuries are serious,
Pittsburgh may be in deep doodoo.
--dan'l
|
18.536 | | CAM::WAY | Ruck over! Ruck over! | Mon Oct 08 1990 12:08 | 5 |
18.537 | | REFINE::ASHE | Homey don't play that... | Mon Oct 08 1990 16:26 | 1 |
| What's wr?ng with W??ds?n? H?w l?ng is he ?ut?
|
18.538 | | STARVU::MACGREGOR | DECview3D engineer - DTN 287-3318 | Mon Oct 08 1990 16:59 | 2 |
| I think that after this weekend the offensive coordinators name
should be changed from J_e Walt_n (no o) to JoE WALToN (little o)
|
18.539 | Steeler injury update | PFSVAX::JACOB | Four down and No O J_e | Mon Oct 08 1990 22:33 | 20 |
| The Pittsburgh Press today reports that Tim Worley's ankle injury may
be the most serious injury suffered by a Steeler yesterday. He's
already listed as "doubtful" for the Denver game. Brister's rib injury
is not thought to be serious enuf to keep him out of the Denver game.
Rod Woodson's bruised right thigh is also, as Noll put it, Nothing
catastrophic. He is expected to play against Denver also.
The Chargers missed something in yesterday's game that could have
helped them immensely. That is that along with Woodson getting hurt,
free safety Thomas Everett(strained lower back) and backup safety Larry
Griggin both went down to injuries in the early part of the 2nd
quarter, leaving the Steelers with only 4 healthy defensive backs to
play and the Steelers were covering receivers with linebackers at one
point in the game. Had the Chargers thrown in 4 wide receivers, they
may have been able to eat the Steeler secondary alive. Dwayne
Woodruff, subbing for Woodson, intercepted 2 passes.
JaKe
|
18.540 | Sundays game summary | PFSVAX::JACOB | Four down and No O J_e | Mon Oct 08 1990 22:56 | 58 |
| Here are the stats from the Steeler-Charger game:
Scoring Summary
San Diego 7 0 7 0 -- 14
Pittsburgh 3 14 7 12 -- 36
Pit--FG Anderson 45yds
SD--Plummer 2yd pass from Tolliver(Camey pat)
Pit--Green 8 yd pass from Brister(Anderson pat)
Pit--Green 1 yd pass from Brister(Anderson kick)
Pit--Williams 2 yd run(Anderson pat)
SD--LMiller fumble recovery in end zone(Camey pat)
Pit--Safety, Stowe blocked punt out of end zone
Pit--FG Anderson 45yds
Pit--Foster 2yd run (Anderson pat)
Team Stats
San Diego STEELERS
14 First Downs 25
16-92 Rushes/yds 40-185
96 Passing Yds 192
11-29-3 Comp-Att-Int 18-25-0
3-25 Sacked/yards lost 2-9
4-26 Punts 2-37
1-0 Fumbles-lost 2-1
5-35 Penalties-yds 7-39
20:53 Time of Possession 39:07
INDIVIDUAL STATS
Rushing:
SAN DIEGO: Butts 9-55, Bernstine 4-28, Nelson 2-9, Wilson 1-0.
STEELERS: Hoge 16-78, Worley 9-41, W.Williams 9-37, Foster 5-23, Brister 1-6.
Passing:
SAN DIEGO: Tolliver 11-29 121 yds 3ints 1td.
STEELERS: Brister 11-14 132 yds no ints 2TDs, Strom 7-11 68 yds no int 0tds.
Receiving:
SAN DIEGO: A.Miller 4-40, Wilson 3-28, Early 2-51, Plummer 1-2, Butts 1-0.
STEELERS: Lipps 4-51, Hoge 4-20, Green 3-22, Stone 2-46, Bell 2-35, Hill 2-22
Worley 1-4.
Interceptions:
SAN DIEGO: None
STEELERS: Woodruff 2-51, Lake 1-0.
SACKS:
San Diego: Bayless 1-2, Grossman 1-7.
STEELERS: Nickerson 1-2, Lloyd 1-12.
JaKe
|
18.541 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Oct 09 1990 15:32 | 12 |
|
Not that I'm the biggest Joe Walton fan, but I don't believe
he is at fault as some would make us believe. If he was such a
bad offensive coordinator with the Jets, why did the Jets average
21 points a game over this career. Over the same period of time,
the 49'ers only averaged 24 a game. That's not a big difference,
at least not a huge gap that you would expect from an offensive
dork!
bill..g.
|
18.542 | JoE work in the O | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Tue Oct 09 1990 21:05 | 12 |
|
I tend to agree that JoE's particular offense probably is an offense that
can score points with specific tools. I knock on him is that he should
look at the good ground work that was already layed in Pittsburg. The
offensive lineman had the trap blocking schemes down to a science at
the end of last year, he has execellent backs for that type of running
game, and level of comfort with those types of plays. Yes, the
steelers certainly needed to add seriously to the passing game but the
he doesn't have the tools(scat backs) for the swing pass and 3 - 4 yard
passes.
Roy L.
|
18.543 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Shepherds | Thu Oct 11 1990 11:25 | 14 |
| >Had the Chargers thrown in 4 wide receivers, they
>may have been able to eat the Steeler secondary alive.
>JaKe
No way Jake. The Chargers currently have 2 offensive plays as I've
said in note 63.
1. Hand off to run (Butts or Bernstine)
2. Go deep to Miller.
The thought of putting in 4 receivers is immeasurably beyond them.
Live from Charger Central.....Glenn
|
18.544 | JoE--on a trial basis | MKFSA::LONG | | Thu Oct 11 1990 13:59 | 7 |
| Okay, I'll go along and from now on refer to Mr. Walton as JoE, but it
better continue or he's back to J_e.
Thanks again fo rthe stats, JaKe.
Beat 'em Bucs
Bill
|
18.545 | tough schedule! | MKFSA::LONG | | Thu Oct 11 1990 14:18 | 11 |
| Is it my imagination or do the Steelers have the toughest schedule in
the NFL this year? I'm not just saying this because of the snail-like
start the got off to, but it would seem that they play every team who
made it to the playoffs last year with the rest of the games filled
with teams with >.500 records.
I know this sounds like I'm crying in my Terrible Towel, but I'm really
looking for a real answer to this real question.
Beat 'em Bucs
Bill
|
18.546 | Hope we're not done playing baseball at 3 Rivers this year | SHALOT::MEDVID | my apple tree, my brightness | Thu Oct 11 1990 14:42 | 8 |
| Yes. The Steelers schedule was ranked the 2nd toughest in the league
this year. I can't remember who was on top, but the percentage point
difference was very small.
I noted this on the day the schedules were announced. But that's still
no excuse for the way they've played this year.
--dan'l
|
18.547 | Steeler injury update | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cain Tudj Dis | Fri Oct 12 1990 00:09 | 5 |
| Word from Steeler offices is that Tim Worley(sprained ankle) won't play
but Woodson, Everett, Griffin and Brister all are probable.
JaKe
|
18.548 | Help a dude ... | EARRTH::BROOKS | Straight - no chaser ... | Fri Oct 12 1990 10:25 | 1 |
| JaKe, who is straing in place of Worley this week ????
|
18.549 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Fri Oct 12 1990 10:32 | 6 |
|
Should be Foster unless the coaching staff has rocks in their heads...
Barry Foster.....
mike
|
18.550 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Dutch Ovens For Sale | Fri Oct 12 1990 16:26 | 7 |
| Doc:
Reports today are that Warren Williams will get the starting job but
Barry Foster will see some playing time also.
JaKe
|
18.551 | Whatever happened to 24-36-hut! | SHALOT::MEDVID | my apple tree, my brightness | Mon Oct 15 1990 10:05 | 16 |
| Seems like the Steelers offense is getting on track after it has been
simplified a bit. While I was home this weekend, my dad showed me an
article in the Pittsburgh Press about how confusing the offense was.
Here is the name of one play:
Deuce split right tight Z short motion short sprint left 49
two hot ace go on two.
Now imagine these ever-so-brilliant athletes hearing that from Walton,
running it into the huddle, repeating it, then Brister calling it at
the line. Right. Ger real, Joe.
Thank goodness Noll did something.
--dan'l
|
18.552 | What about the KISS principle??? | CAM::WAY | Beaten like a redheaded stepchild... | Mon Oct 15 1990 10:28 | 15 |
| I can't imagine having to keep all of that straight in your mind.
On the Wanderers we have some very simple play calls to remember and
even then it gets tough. You listen to the backs calls as you start
to scrum to know which way the flow goes. Then there are some
plays which get called on the fly....
But even with those simple names, it's tough to remember EVERYTHING.
I can't see a player, in the few seconds they have, keeping track of
ALL of that play you mentioned.
What ever happened to the simple calls, like "Brown, 35 Trap on three"???
'Saw
|
18.553 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Oct 15 1990 12:14 | 7 |
| RE: the play call.
Just the guy bringing it in and Bubble have to be able to remember it.
As he says it, the rest of the players just have to remember the
portion that pertains to them, and the snap count.
Mike JN
|
18.554 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Oct 15 1990 13:56 | 16 |
|
I didn't see the game yesterday, but from the highlights and
the press clippings in the papers, it seems the Steeler's are getting
untracked. Granted, 2 wins is not a whole season, but it's a lot
brighter at the end of the tunnel right now.
Now we get a break in the schedule....against the 49'ers! They
will be tough and it will be a good test to see just how far the
Steeler's have come. I remember a couple of years ago that the
Steeler's upset the 49'ers out there and I believe that was the
only home loss they had that year. So, I hope they can continue
their play and take one from the 49'ers.
bill..g.
|
18.555 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Oct 15 1990 14:22 | 13 |
| I watched the game yesterday and I'd have to say that this was the best I've
ever seen Brister play. (although Denver wasn't putting much pressure on
him). His passes were very accurate and he used almost all of his eligible
receiver's. The 91 yard bomb to Stone was picture perfect. The way Eric
Green has played the last couple of weeks, he may be in the running for
rookie of the year. He's caught every pass I've seen thrown to him including
5 TD's. At 280 lbs, he's a big target. I quess Chuck Noll won't be saying
"Eric who ?" anymore.
I hope the local Colorado station's televise the Steeler-49'er game.
I think it will be a good game since the Steeler's appear to be on a roll.
Keith
|
18.556 | Steelers kick Donks A$$ES(pun intended) | PFSVAX::JACOB | Dutch Ovens For Sale | Mon Oct 15 1990 16:36 | 17 |
| Brister was 21-28, 4 td's and 353 yards yesterday. It was the best day
he's had so far, and Chuck Noll, during his Monday news conference,
said alot of the credit goes to Brister because they let him call his
own plays for the most part yesterday. I also noticed him changing the
plays at the line a few times.
Re Eric Green
He has dropped only one pass and that was a sure td. He has caught 7
passes(I think) and 5 of them have been TD's.
I'll put the stats from the game in later tonite as I've got a few
things to do first.
Later
JaKe
|
18.557 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Straight - no chaser ... | Mon Oct 15 1990 18:12 | 12 |
| Loved the way Bubby shot down a reporter the other day :
Seems that the Steelers will no longer use the messenger system to
bring in plays. One sportswriter was looking for a scoop (or mud), and
asked Bubby what the problem was.
Bubby said (an appx.), "Try bringing in
2-back-split-left-over-brown-right-flood-fullback-screen-X-flood-on-two."
And he said it all in 2 seconds.
Everybody was roooling .... and it illustrated his point perfectly.
|
18.558 | Steeler-Donks stats | PFSVAX::JACOB | pms Band plays3WksBlues&1WkRagtime | Mon Oct 15 1990 21:56 | 61 |
|
Scoring Summary
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 0 14 7 13 34
Broncos 10 7 0 0 17
1st Qtr
Broncos- Winder 1 yd run(Treadwell kick)
Broncos- FG Treadwell 24yd
2nd Qtr
STEELERS- Lipps 6 yd pass from Brister(Anderson kick)
Broncos- Sewell 2 yd run(Treadwell kick)
STEELERS- Green 3 yd pass from Brister(Anderson kick)
3rd Qtr
STEELERS- Hoge 6 yd run(Anderson kick)
4th Qtr
STEELERS- Green 10 yd pass from Brister(Anderson kick)
STEELERS- Green 3 yd pass from Brister(Anderson kick
Attendance=74285
Broncos STEELERS
16 1st Downs 25
20-66 Rushes-Yds 30-108
178 Passing Yds 343
17-36-0 Comp-Att-Int 21-28-0
3-16 Sacks-yds lost 1-10
2-1 Fumbles-lost 4-2
5-48 Punts 2-43
9-68 Penalties-yds 9-87
28:33 Time of Poss 31:27
Individual Stats:
Rushing:
Broncos:Elway 6-38, Winder 12-19, Bratton 1-7, Sewell 1-2.
STEELERS:Hoge 18-76, Williams 6-22, Brister 2-7, Foster 2-2, Bell 2-1.
Passing:
Broncos: Elway 17-36-0 194 yds
STEELERS: Brister 21-28 353 yds, 4Td's
Receiving:
Broncos: Winder 5-32, Sewell 3-26, Jackson 2-64, Bratton 2-12, Young 1-19,
Johnson 1-15, Sharpe 1-12, Mobley 1-3, Kay 1-11.
STEELERS: Lipps 9-141, Green 4-28, Williams 3-34, Mularkey 2-33, Calloway
2-27, Stone 1-90.
JaKe
|
18.559 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | pms Band plays3WksBlues&1WkRagtime | Mon Oct 15 1990 22:05 | 30 |
| Some random rambling on the Steelers.
First, how does a team play 4 games without getting close to scoring an
offensive TD and then score 9, count 'em 9, Td's in 2 weeks. Well,
here's my theory.
The Pirates were in the thick of a pennant race when the football
season started. The Steeler mgmt and the Pirate mgmt made an agreement
that the Steelers would play horrible so as not to distract the fan
support away from the Pirates. Then, once the Bucs were in the
playoffs, the Steelers started PLAYING for real and have amassed 70
points in the last 2 weeks.
Eric Green, the Steeler rookie TE who was a holdout until a couple of
weeks ago tied for second most TD passes caught in a game yesterday
with 3 tds. Chuck Noll had said in August that Green would be of no
help to the team this year because of his lenghty holdout and couldn't
pick up the offense unless he were a genius. Said Noll yesterday,
"He's(Green) a genius."
Yesterday was Brister's 3rd career 300 yd game.
Yesterday was Lipps 16th 100+ yd game.
Dwight Stone said he inadvertently stepped out of bounds on the 4 yd
line because he lost his sense of where he was on the field. The play
covered 90 yards and would have covered 94 had Stone's not stepped out
of bounds.
JaKe
|
18.560 | A big weekend for the AFC Central | SHALOT::MEDVID | my apple tree, my brightness | Tue Oct 16 1990 09:28 | 25 |
| > Chuck Noll had said in August that Green would be of no
> help to the team this year because of his lenghty holdout and couldn't
> pick up the offense unless he were a genius. Said Noll yesterday,
> "He's(Green) a genius."
I can see Noll grinning that patented grin of his as he said it too.
He's a man of few words, but he knows when and how to eat them too.
Classic.
> Dwight Stone said he inadvertently stepped out of bounds on the 4 yd
> line because he lost his sense of where he was on the field.
Hope I'm never driving the opposite way on the same street as him.
Thanks to Houston's thrashing of Cincinnati:
- If Cleveland can do the same this weekend, and
- New Orleans beats Houston, and
- (the big IF) Pittsburgh beats San Francisco,
there would be a three-way tie for first in the division with
Cleveland only one game back.
--dan'l
|
18.561 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | EverUseADictaphone..NopeJustMyFingers | Tue Oct 16 1990 20:58 | 22 |
| >> Thanks to Houston's thrashing of Cincinnati:
>> - If Cleveland can do the same this weekend, and
>> - New Orleans beats Houston, and
>> - (the big IF) Pittsburgh beats San Francisco,
Dan'l,
The only thing I see wrong with this scenario is Clevescum beating
SinSinati. As much as I dislike the Bungles, I hate the
Brown(spot)s(tm) even worse and do you notice how quiet Hal Whitehair
is this week after the 'spots lost??? If the Brown(spot)s(tm) were to
beat the Bungles Hal would be spouting off at how great Bernice is and
how there's no stopping the 'spots and they are headed for the Super
Bowl and may never lose a game again until the end of the world and
even then he'll say they'll be 5 point favorites to beat God.
Let the Bungles beat the spots and may the Steelers play one hell of a
game and catch the 49ers on a down day.
JaKe
|
18.562 | FWIW | PFSVAX::JACOB | EverUseADictaphone?NopeIDialByFinger | Wed Oct 17 1990 23:29 | 166 |
| 1990 Pittsburgh Steeler Stats (thru 6 games)
Game Results
Steelers 3 Cleveland 13 0-1-0
Steelers 20 Houston 9 1-1-0
Steelers 3 L.A.Raiders 20 1-2-0
Steelers 6 Miami 28 1-3-0
Steelers 36 San Diego 14 2-3-0
Steelers 34 Denver 17 3-3-0
Team Statistics
STEELERS Opponents
Total first Downs 100 97
Rushing 28 38
Passing 61 48
Penalty 11 11
3rd down made/att 30/76 31/80
3rd down pct. 39.5 38.8
4th down pct 33.3 50.0
Total Net Yards 1526 1496
Avg per game 254.3 249.3
Total Plays 347 364
Avg. per play 4.4 4.1
Net Yards Rushing 539 536
Avg per game 89.9 89.3
Total rushes 165 154
Net Yards Passing 987 960
Avg per game 164.5 160.0
Sacked/yds lost 21/148 18/113
Gross yards 1135 1073
Att/comp 161/96 192/92
Pct Compl 59.6 47.9
Had intercepted 6 9
Punts/Average 30/39.2 30/39.6
Net punting average 36.5 33.0
Penalties/yards 50/362 43/327
Fumbles/fumbles lost 16/6 6/2
Touchdowns 11 12
Rushing 3 7
Passing 6 3
Returns 2 2
Score By Periods 1 2 3 4 ot T
STEELERS 13 37 17 35 0 102
Opponents 24 31 22 24 0 101
INDIVIDUAL STATS
Scoring TD
RUSH PASS RET PAT FG SAFETY TOTAL POINTS
Anderson 0 0 0 10/10 8/9 0 34
Eric Green 0 5 0 0 0 0 30
Foster 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
Hoge 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
Johnson 0 0 1 0 0 0 6
Lipps 0 1 0 0 0 0 6
W.Williams 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
Woodson 0 0 1 0 0 0 6
Stowe 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
STEELERS 3 6 2 10/11 8/9 1 102
Opponents 7 3 2 12/12 5/8 1 101
RUSHING:
NO. Yds Avg Long Td
Hoge 77 262 3.4 16 1
Worley 45 143 3.2 15 0
W.Williams 18 63 3.5 9 1
Foster 9 27 3.0 12 1
Brister 8 18 2.3 7 0
Bell 4 17 4.3 12 0
Stryzinski 1 9 9.0 9 0
Strom 3 0 0.0 2 0
STEELERS 165 539 3.3 16 3
Opponents 154 536 3.5 25 7
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg Long Td
Lipps 25 358 14.3 37 1
Mularkey 17 171 10.1 23 0
Hoge 13 97 7.5 15 0
Hill 11 123 11.2 22 0
Green 7 50 7.1 13 5
Stone 5 161 32.2 90 0
Bell 5 60 15.0 21 0
Calloway 4 43 10.8 19 0
Worley 4 23 5.8 8 0
W.Williams 3 34 11.3 13 0
O'Shea 1 13 13.0 13 0
Foster 1 2 2.0 2 0
STEELERS 96 1135 11.8 90 6
Opponents 92 1073 11.7 66 3
PASSING:
Att Compl Yds Pct Td Int
Brister 143 84 991 58.7 6 6
Strom 18 12 144 66.7 0 0
STEELERS 161 96 1135 59.6 6 6
Opponents 192 92 1073 47.9 3 9
INTERCEPTIONS:
No. Yds Avg. Long Td
Woodruff 2 51 25.5 28 0
Griffin 2 15 7.5 15 0
Johnson 1 26 26.0 26 1
Hinkle 1 19 19.0 19 0
A.Jones 1 3 3.0 3 0
Woodson 1 1 1.0 1 0
Lake 1 0 0.0 0 0
STEELERS 9 115 12.8 28 1
Opponents 6 63 10.5 21 0
Punting:
No Yds Avg Blocked
Stryzinski 30 1175 36.5 0
STEELERS 30 1175 36.5 0
Opponents 30 1189 36.5 1
PUNT RETURNS:
No. Fair Caught Yds Avg Long Td
Woodson 15 3 158 10.5 52 1
Hill 1 0 0 0 0 0
STEELERS 16 3 158 9.9 52 1
Opponents 6 16 59 6.6 39 0
QB SACKS:
No
Davidson 3-1/2
Lloyd 2
Evans 2
Jenkins 2
Nickerson 2
A.Jones 2
Willis 1-1/2
G.Williams 1
J.Williams 1
Lake 1
FUMBLES:
No. Lost
Brister 5 2
W.Williams 3 3
Hoge 3 1
Woodson 2 0
Hill 1 0
Strom 1 0
Worley 1 0
JaKe
|
18.563 | 2nd half crumble | 34223::MEDVID | Groove is in the Heart | Mon Oct 22 1990 09:24 | 18 |
| Well, I'm sure you've all seen the replay of my favorite Steelers
rookie Barry Foster just letting that kickoff bounce once, twice, three
times..."Oh, am I supposed to get that?"
Good going, Barry. Nice way to forget something most 5 year olds know.
I would have loved to have known what you were saying on the sidelines
to your fellow players and coach. I can't even fathom an excuse.
It was a close game between the 49er's and the Steelers until that.
Then the Steelers gave the ball away twice down by the goal line and it
was over. Guess that will drop the defense out of its first place AFC
standing.
Montana is the greatest QB ever. I doubt that the Steelers would have
won this game anyway the way the SF offense was clicking. But the
Steelers certainly didn't help their cause at all.
--dan'l
|
18.564 | And another thing | 34223::MEDVID | Groove is in the Heart | Mon Oct 22 1990 10:37 | 8 |
| Even if that kickoff Foster treated as a punt were a punt, he still
should have fielded it since it landed around the 8 yard line!
Foster says in the paper, "I blacked out..."
Uh huh.
--dan'l
|
18.565 | | 10881::DEVLIN_JO | They stamp them when they're small | Mon Oct 22 1990 12:04 | 6 |
| About 5 or 6 years ago, in a Giants/Rams game, the Rams had a rookie
kick returner (may have been Ron Brown), who let the opening kickoff
bounce into the endzone and lay there. Phil McConkey simply ran
into the end zone and fell on it. ThekR for the Rams was amazed.
JD
|
18.566 | | 6984::CHILDS | one nine hundred YT Guilt | Mon Oct 22 1990 12:15 | 9 |
|
Dan-l, they'll probably hand on to the ranking as the niners only had to drive
5 and 18 yards for the TD's. I couldn't believe it my jaw hit the floor. Lousy
pass interfence call at the goal line near the end of the first half hurt. Good
reversal on the TD for Bell. Just read the stats and they only allowed Montana
157 yards through the air plus picked him off twice. Montana's lowest ouput for
the season...
mike
|
18.567 | disgusted, again! | 19358::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Oct 22 1990 13:34 | 45 |
|
Yea, that play didn't help, but the Steeler offense was another
noshow. Everytime I get a chance to see the Steeler's play, they
end up stinking up the joint. Apart from the two early drives,
they made a suspect 49'er defense look pretty good.
The defense was respectable, but I still can't figure out how
they continually were getting beat on those short patterns. It's
one thing to get beat once, but it's quite another thing to get
beat over and over again. I would of liked to see them go with
6-7 defensive backs more instead of the 3-4. The Steeler linebackers
have got to be the slowest bunch of clods in the league. The other
thing that disturbed me on defense was the fact that they let a
non-running team run all over them. It's no mystery this year that
the 49'ers are having problems running the ball, but again, the
Steeler's made their "backups" look like allpro's.
And, once again, I come to my favorite player, Bubby. I can't
remember me hating a Pittsburgh athlete more than I hate this guy.
Why I didn't even hate Mark Malone this much, and he was a real
zero! Once again, Bubby couldn't produce a thing in the second
half. A couple of times, he could of run and instead he either
forced the ball, or was sacked. Walsh said the exact same thing
I was thinging a couple of times when he stated that Brister was
hanging on to the ball to long. This is Bubby's fifth year, and
he still reminds me of a first year QB. As for all this talent
that he is *supposed* to have, I havn't seen it yet! One decent
game in 7 does not make a QB! In the 4th quarter after Foster and
Bubby had given the game away, why didn't they put in Strom? Geez,
give the guy some playing time. The game was over, and Strom could
of gotten some valuable experience!
One last thing that got me wondering and that is Noll. Has
he mellowed as the years have gone by? I remember him reading the
riot act to to Bradshaw more than once after he made a bonehead
play. But in yesterdays game, Brister made a couple of big boners
and Noll just stands there ever so kind. Then Foster makes an even
bigger boner and we don't even see Noll talking to him. I know
Noll is Mr. Stoneface, but in the 70's, he chewed out more than
one player for lackluster play, but now it seems he is content with
this bunch of overrated misfits. I just don't see the intensity
with this team from the top down. There is no leader on offense
and there is no leader on defense. I still think it's going to
be a looooong year for the Steeler's.
|
18.568 | More than one reason... | 6862::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Mon Oct 22 1990 13:46 | 7 |
|
The steeler defense played too far off the receivers!!! That
is why they lost this game! Why were they playing 10 yards off
the wide receivers??? Are they really that slow???
WOOF!
|
18.569 | Brister & Noll OK; was Walsh holding his crotch in the booth? | 34223::MEDVID | Groove is in the Heart | Mon Oct 22 1990 14:45 | 33 |
18.570 | | 5176::BROOKS | Straight - no chaser ... | Mon Oct 22 1990 15:21 | 16 |
| re .567
Goose, I'm not sure that Noll could do more than Foster did to himself.
Believe me, making a fool of yourself on national TV (like Foster said
later) will make 1,000 times the impact that Noll ever could.
Oh, and I hope you didn't get your hopes to high from last year - the
Steelers are still one or two good drafts away from being a good team
IMHO. They overachieved last year, but still have a ways to go.
re .568
Hal, is this your note of the week (assuming that you'll of course be
silent after the Been-Girls wipe the floor with ya tonight) ?
Doc
|
18.571 | | 19358::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Oct 22 1990 16:31 | 33 |
|
I don't disagree with either opinion about Noll yelling at Foster,
but Noll used to yell at players he thought were screwing up. One
of the main reasons why Bradshaw has problems with Noll is the fact
that Chuck used to ball him out on the sidelines in front of the
crowd and the TV audience. Bradshaw has said that it was the most
humiliating thing ever done to him, and then he admitted that it made
him a better player over the long haul. I just don't see Noll doing
that anymore.
As for Brister, I don't see him as a leader at all. He is frank
and to the point, but after 5 years of *potential*, it's time that
we should start seeing that potential on the field. As for Malone,
I'll give you credit that Brister has better potential, but at this
point, they are in the same boat as far as I am concerned. Brister
has a lot of weapons to use right now and I don't understand how
a team can cover 4 receivers and a running back without someone
being open. If no one is open, then Brister should pack it in and
haul it for an easy 10. So far, all I've seen Brister do is stand
in the pocket and get mashed. On that 4 and 10 in the 4th yesterday,
Brister could of run for 20, but he chose to throw long into double
coverage in the endzone, which was batted down. To me, that was
stupid. With the defense playing deep, he had plenty of running
room and could of picked up the first down easily. With 4 and 10,
why try a 40 yard pass? Especially when he could of picked it up
by running for it.
I just feel Brister is a bum and the Steeler's are wasting these
years trying to bring out his potential...yuk!
bill..g.
|
18.572 | B!tch of a loss | 36912::JACOB | National Rodeo Sex Champion 1990 | Mon Oct 22 1990 23:29 | 52 |
| Steeler VS. 49er stats
Scoring summary
1 2 3 4 F
STEELERS 7 0 0 0 7
49ers 0 10 10 7 27
STEELERS Bell 2 yd pass from Brister(Anderson kick)
SF FG Cofer 39 yds
SF Sherrard 5 yd pass from Montana(Cofer kick)
SF FG Cofer 20 yd
SF Rathman 1 yd run(Cofer kick)
SF Rathman 1 yd run(Cofer kick)
Team Stats
STEELERS 49ers
14 first downs 22
23-97 Rushes/yds 37-150
103 Passing yds 154
13-22-1 Compl-att-int 20-30-2
2-17 Sacked/yds lost 1-3
3-36.7 Punts 1-39
1-1 Fumbles-lost 2-1
5-65 Penalties-yds 6-50
25:44 Time of possession 34:16
INDIVIDUAL STATS
Rushing:
49ers: Carter 17-90, Sydney 7-31, Rathman 10-27, Montana 2-4, Young 1-
(-3)
STEELERS: Hoge 16-64, Williams 5-30, Brister 2-3.
Passing:
49ers: Montana 20-30-2 157 yds.
STEELERS: Brister 13-22-1 120 yds.
Receiving:
49ers: Carter 7-57, Rathman 6-29, rice 3-31, Sherrard 3-26, Taylor 1-4.
STEELERS: Green 3-37, Hoge 3-34, Stone 3-16, Mularkey 1-16, Lipps 1-11,
Hill 1-4, Bell 1-4.
JaKe
|
18.573 | Random Ramblings | 36912::JACOB | National Rodeo Sex Champion 1990 | Mon Oct 22 1990 23:40 | 28 |
| Chas. Noll said today that the Steeler defensive game plan was to
keep Montana from connecting with Rice or Taylor for the "BIG" play,
which they did. Consider this, the Steelers held Montana to 157 yards
and Rice (3catches for 31 yards) and Taylor(1 catch for 14 yds) were
all but invisible.
The turning point of the game, IMHO, was the brain-dead play of Barry
Foster on letting the kickoff drop and the 49ers recover. Rod Woodson,
the Steelers regular kickoff returner, said he was exhausted from the
49ers drive(51 yds, 14 plays, 7:54) and therefore the Steelers used
Dwight Stone and Foster on the kickoff. Woodson later said the he
should have been in on the kickoff even though he was tired. The score
at the time of the botch-up was 13-7 and three plays later, it was 20-7
and the wind was out of the Steeler sails.
The defense limited the 49ers to 305 yards total offense, which is 100
yards under the 'ers average. The longest pass play for the 49ers was
19 yards.
The Steeler offense started out the game looking like they would eat
the 49er "D" for lunch, only to go flat after the first quarter.
Next week the Steelers return to Monday night football for the first
time in over 2 years against the Rams in Pittsburgh.
JaKe
|
18.574 | | 36912::JACOB | National Rodeo Sex Champion 1990 | Tue Oct 23 1990 00:28 | 105 |
| BEYOND THE FINAL SCORE, STEELERS GET ONE TO GROW ON!!!!
(reprinted without permission from The Pittsburgh Press, 10-22-90
author Bob Smizik)
San Francisco-By all obvious indications the defeat was thorough and
convincing. The score did not necessarily indicate a rout, but something close
to it. The victors had won by 20 points, had scored the final 27 points of the
game and in the final 30 minutes almost totally stifled the loser's offense.
But the obvious did not tell the full story in the game between the Steelers
and the San Francisco 49ers. An earnest test of football skills took place
yesterday at Candlestick Park, and the differences in those skills were not as
great as the 27-7 margin in favor of the 49ers would indicate.
Those quick to dismiss the Steelers on the basis of this defeat are wrong.
It would be easy to cite the Steelers recent record of offensive ineptitude
and point out how it resurfaced, maybe for good, yesterday. It would be easy
to point out the Steelers two most recent victories--the ones that inspired so
much hope--might be flukes, the kind of odd victories that often turn up in the
National Football League.
But that would be unfair. It would not tell the true story of this team.
Other than proclaiming the winner and loser, the final score yesterday
proved only one thing, the Steelers are not yet ready for the best team in the
NFL. It does not prove they will be unable to contest the remainder of the
schedule or that they might not triumph over a large portion of that schedule.
There were other numbers besides the final score. Consider:
--Joe Montana, perhaps the greatest quarterback ever and most certainly the
most proficient in the game today, was limited to 157 yards passing. This is
more that 200 yards BELOW his AVERAGE of 358.4. And it wasn't that Montana
didn't attempt to defeat the Steelers with passing. He threw 30 times. Twenty
were for completions, but most were DINKS. Montana had been averaging 9 yds
per attempt, yesterday he averaged 5.2 yds.
--Jerry Rice, the Joe Montana of wide receivers, caught 3 balls for 31 yds. He
had been averaging 7 catches a game for 115 yds.
--For the first 41 minutes of the game, the Steelers played the 49ers even.
Only in the final 19 minutes, when they made 2 monumental errors that all but
handed the 49ers touchdowns, did the Steelers fall out of the game.
It was, in short, no game to walk away from in disgust, no game to destroy
confidence, no game to wipe out title hopes. It was, in fact, a game on which
to build.
"I really think we came out of here feeling we're a good team even though
we got beat, 27-7," fullback Merril Hoge said.
Most certainly most of the pluses to build upon were on the defensive side
of the ball. The limiting of Montana and Rice was a major achievment. If it
left room for rookie running back Dexter Carter to excel, so be it. No one
expected the 49ers to be totally shut down.
Carter caught 7 passes for 57 yards and ran 17 times for 90 yards. Those
are admirable numbers, but considering how comparatively unproductive Montana
and Rice were, they were nothing that should embarrass the Steelers' defense.
The final 2 49er touchdowns were all but given to them. When rookie
running back Barry Foster forgot the rules and got out of the way of a kickoff
he was expected to field after San Francisco increased its lead to 13-7 late in
the 3rd quarter, the 49ers recovered the free kick on the 5 and scored in 3
plays. Bubby Brister fumbled on his 17 and the 49ers scored 5 plays later.
This is not to suggest those plays were freaks that would not happen if
they played again. in another setting, the 49ers would find another way to
win. But what those somewhat unusual plays point out is the Steelers are not
that far from being a good team.
This week, 40 minutes of good football against the best team in the league,
next month maybe 50 and next season--or the season after--maybe 60.
"You have to be satisfied with some of the things we did," cornerback Rod
Woodson said, "the score didn't indicate it, but we did some good things."
"I think we learned some things today," Hoge said, "I think this is one of
our most positive games of the year as far as the ones we've lost."
"The difference between the 49ers and some other teams is the desire and
the attitude of wanting to get it done and hanging in there and continually
getting it done. We need to learn to do that."
The teams the Steelers will meet in the next two weeks played each other
yesterday and the Los Angeles Rams, the major dissapointment of the NFL, showed
signs of becoming the team they were expected to be by defeating the Atlanta
Falcons. Both teams are 2-4 and will play at Three River Stadium.
"We have to win our next two," Woodson said, "If we do, we're 5-4. Our
second half of the season is a little easier than the first. If we come out of
the first half at .500, that would be great."
Rather than by ruling out such an immediate future for the Steelers,
yesterday's defeat made it more probable.
"I think we're a better team for this," Hoge said.
JaKe
|
18.575 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Sinead O'Connor=Davy Jones w/sexchange | Wed Oct 24 1990 00:21 | 11 |
| Steeler injuries:
Aaron Jones is out indefinitely with a broken bone in his foot.
John Reinstra is questionable for next Monday night as of today.
Tim Worley is still doubtful.
JaKe
|
18.576 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Re-Elect NOBODY!!!!! | Tue Oct 30 1990 00:33 | 5 |
| At the half Steelers 17, Rams 10. Offense sparkles one minute and
looks lousy the next.
JaKe
|
18.577 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Re-Elect NOBODY!!!!! | Tue Oct 30 1990 01:58 | 6 |
| Steelers crush the LAme Rams 41-10.
Record is now 4-4.
JaKe
|
18.578 | Triumphant return to Monday Night! | SHALOT::MEDVID | Dump Jesse Helms | Tue Oct 30 1990 02:13 | 14 |
|
|---------------|
| |
| |
| |
J | | E !!!
| |
| |
| |
|---------------|
|
18.579 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Oct 30 1990 09:29 | 4 |
| What's with Joe Walton anyway? Didn't see him diggin' once lasted
night, and only caught him once against the 9ers. Did he join
Nostrinonymous?
Denny
|
18.580 | Great night, before the game the SI Swimsuit special was on HBO | CNTROL::CHILDS | Never, hear surf music again... | Tue Oct 30 1990 10:27 | 11 |
|
Best sign of the night: The Steel Curtain, Rusted No More!! What a defense..
Everett kind of looks to me like a Big Bad John clone, All hype and ready
to cry when things don't go right. Bubby sure looks a lot more relaxed now
then he did at the begining of the year. I loved it when he missed the TD
to Stone and he pretended he was shooting a lame duck out of the sky...
Oh and I just saw Hal, naturally he claims that the Rams handed the game
to the Steelers. hahhaaaa
mike
|
18.581 | | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Tue Oct 30 1990 11:06 | 5 |
| Morning.
Anyone happen to have the scoring breakdown for last night?
Thx... glen
|
18.582 | | GOLF::KINGR | PREPARE to die earth scum!!!!!!!!!!! | Tue Oct 30 1990 11:17 | 14 |
| LA Pit
7 - 0 LA G. Green 100 yard kick-off return PAT Lansford
7 - 7 Pitt Hoge 6 yd pass from Brister PAT Anderson
7 - 14 Pit E. Green 17 yd pass fron Brister PAT Anderson
10 - 14 LA FG Lansford 32 yd
10 - 17 Pit Anderson FG 42 yd
10 - 20 Pit Anderson FG 30 yd
10 - 27 Pit Hoge 1 yd run PAT Anderson
10 - 34 Pit Stone 8 yd pass from Brister PAT Anderson
10 - 41 Pit Hoge 2 yd pass from Brister PAT Anderson
REK
|
18.583 | Joe Walton's favorite phrase, "picky, picky"! | SASE::SZABO | | Tue Oct 30 1990 11:55 | 11 |
18.584 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Oct 30 1990 12:04 | 36 |
|
I don't believe it, I watched the Steeler's and they finally
played well. I've been a Brister basher, and I still am, but I'll
give Bubby some credit because he played pretty well.
I'm still concerned though. The defense has absolutely no pass
rush and this could really hurt the Steeler's in weeks to come.
As good as the secondary is, without a pass rush, it will cause
problems.
The other disturbing thing is that the bust of the first rounders
continues. Of course, this years pick looks like a gem (why don't
they throw to him more?), the other big picks are playing the same
old tune.
Worley: good back, with plenty of potential, but is constantly
hurt. He was hurt last year and has been hurt in
pre-season, and has missed the last 3 games with an
ankle injury... and HE wants traded??
Jones: Another mistake. Although the best built Steeler, this
stiff has also had the injury bug..He is never healthy,
and when he is, plays like 10th round pick.
Reinstra: Another all-world pick with plent of po.., but again,
is always hurt.
Granted, there's not a lot you can do about injuries, but the
Steeler's have not had good luck with first rounders over the years.
If these guys could/would stay healthy, they could help fill the
voids in the Steeler system.
bill..g.
|
18.585 | Great opening | SHALOT::HUNT | No. 1 Ranked Virginia Cavaliers | Tue Oct 30 1990 12:20 | 11 |
| I bagged the game at halftime. Steelers' fans have to be heartened by
their victory especially after the opening kickoff.
I don't think I've ever seen a 100 yard kickoff return go in such a
straight line up the field with not a single hand laid on the guy.
One or maybe two blocks and whoosh ... gone.
Dierdorf said it best: "He didn't even have to break a fingernail
tackle."
Bob Hunt
|
18.586 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Oct 30 1990 12:25 | 18 |
| Hawk, go to the head of the class. If his forward leg was ahead of the
goal line, it should have been marked as a 99 yard kickoff return.
Consider this, though. If the Pittsburgh stat crew doesn't have a
position at exactly the 50 yard line, the angle may have been deceptive
for them. I know that at our games, we are at the 35 on the north end
of the stadium (the end closest to the admin building) and it's a lot
easier to mark the ball accurately when it's on that side of the 50.
The closer the ball gets to the other goal line, the harder it is to
mark. I sometimes will move to a position in the press box closer to
the 50 where I can see the ball better.
The same principle applied to Tom Dempsey's record 62 yard field goal.
It actually was a 62 yard field goal because the ball wasn't spotted on
the 37, it was on the 38 (at that time, the goal posts were on the goal
line).
John
|
18.587 | Have the ghosts of J Greene and J Lambert returned | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Tue Oct 30 1990 12:45 | 11 |
| The Steeler's defense put some incredible hits on the Rams last night.
By the 3rd quarter, I got the impression that LA was intimidated.
It was real nice to hear the return of the DEFENSE - DEFENSE yells in
3 rivers stadium. If they could improve the pass rush, they could have the
best defense in football.
Look for the Steeler's to return to the playoffs and possibly win the
Central
Keith
|
18.588 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Never, hear surf music again... | Tue Oct 30 1990 13:04 | 5 |
|
The reason Green didn't even have to break as much as fingernail tackle
was the great holding/tackling blocking of the Rams.....
mike
|
18.589 | That Eric Green is a MONSTER!!! | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Voted for whatsisname... | Tue Oct 30 1990 14:14 | 1 |
|
|
18.590 | | EDIT::CRITZ | LeMond Wins '86,'89,'90 TdF | Tue Oct 30 1990 14:16 | 12 |
| RE: 18.587
Keith,
You beat me to it.
Delpino (on a coupla kick returns) got hit, but good. On one,
he was flipped forward onto his back. On the next one, he
was knocked on his butt big time. He decided to stay on the
deck for a while and think about life, stars, etc...
Scott
|
18.591 | TE | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Tue Oct 30 1990 14:17 | 4 |
| The aforementioned 'bust of the first rounders' certainly appears to
have ended with the signing or Green. Big. Strong. Fast. Hands.
Anyone care to comment on his blocking ability?
|
18.592 | | PNO::HEISER | let's get busy! | Tue Oct 30 1990 15:24 | 4 |
| Are the Steelers vastly improved or are the Lambs(tm) that bad now?
What happened to LA?
Mike
|
18.593 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Oct 30 1990 16:40 | 28 |
|
re: mike
Mike, I think it's a combination. The Steeler's have improved,
but not by leaps and bounds. They still lack a pass rush and a
good back. The secondary has been developing the last couple of
years and is really starting to pay dividends. If they can get
a pass rush, their defense will sparkle. I think with the addition
of Walton, the offense has changed and they are doing some different
things instead of just running the trap. Not that the offense is
golden, but if Brister has a decent game, with this offense, the
Steeler's will move the ball. And, their first round pick, Eric
Green looks like a winner. The guy is simply huge and yet plays
TE. I only wish they would throw him the ball more. 6 TD's on
about 12 receptions!
As for the Rams, they have sunk. They blew some opportunities
last night though. They missed 2 FG's and they were on the Steeler
5 and couldn't punch it in with 4 downs. Mistakes also killed them
although some of the fumbles might of been because of the vicious
hitting the Steeler's were doing. The one hit on a kickoff was
a tremendous blow. For a while, the Ram player looked like he was
dead. I mean, he got hit about as hard as one can be hit. It looked
like he was knocked out. I still think the rams have a decent team,
but their defense was pretty poor last night.
bill..g.
|
18.594 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Tue Oct 30 1990 17:16 | 7 |
| > Anyone care to comment on his blocking ability?
When Chuck Noll was asked about the abilities of his new tight end,
he said nothing about his pass catching abilities/speed etc. However,
he did say that he has the potential to be a devastating blocker.
Keith
|
18.595 | I'm sure he was quoted out of context ;-) | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Tue Oct 30 1990 17:16 | 2 |
| Was that before or after Chuck said "he's not going to be any good to
us now"?
|
18.596 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Tue Oct 30 1990 17:18 | 3 |
| I believe it was after Green had already played 2 games and scored 5 TD's
Keith
|
18.597 | | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Tue Oct 30 1990 17:20 | 5 |
| Thanks.
I don't recall hearing very much about Green as a possible ROY
candidate. I wonder why (yeah, I know it's early). He's definitely
succeeding in what is reportedly a very complicated offense to learn.
|
18.598 | Always open | SHALOT::MEDVID | Dump Jesse Helms | Tue Oct 30 1990 18:24 | 13 |
| > He's definitely
> succeeding in what is reportedly a very complicated offense to learn.
That's not hard. He's so big he's always open. ;-)
Dierdork was hilarious talking about Green last night after Green ran
the down and out for a touchdown. "How do you lose track of that
thing?"
--dan'l
PS: Keep the hefty on, Dan. It looks better.
|
18.599 | Week 8 Stats | PFSVAX::JACOB | Re-Elect NOBODY!!!!! | Tue Oct 30 1990 22:43 | 54 |
| Final Steelers 41
Rams 10
Scoring Summary
1 2 3 4 Tot
L.A.Rams 7 3 0 0 10
STEELERS 14 3 10 14 41
LA-Green 100yd kickoff return
Pgh-Hoge 6 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
Pgh-E.Green 17 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
LA-FG Lansford 32 yd
PGH-FG Anderson 42 yd
Pgh-FG Anderson 30 yd
Pgh-Hoge 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Pgh-Stone 8 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
Pgh-Hoge 2 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
Attendance-56466
Team Stats:
L.A.Rams STEELERS
13 1st downs 18
23-44 Rushes-Yds 34-189
173 Passing Yds 156
15-35-2 Comp-Att-Int 15-24-1
1-3 Sacked-yds lost 1-5
5-40 Punts 5-37
3-1 Fumbles-lost 0-0
5-44 Penalties-yds 9-136
27:26 Tim of possession 32:34
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
L.A.Rams: Gary 15-34, McGee 3-15, Warner 4-6, English 1-(minus 11)
STEELERS: W.Williams 8-78, Foster 6-53, Hoge 18-52, Brister 2-6
PASSING:
L.A.Rams: J. Everett 15-34-2-176 yds, Long 0-1-0-0yds.
STEELERS: Brister 15-24-1-161 yds
RECEIVING:
L.A.Rams: Ellard 7-99, McGee 5-39, A.Cox 1-20, W.Anderson 1-12, Holohan 1-6
STEELERS: Hoge 6-28, Stone 2-48, Lipps 3-32, Hill 2-23, E.Green 1-17, Bell 1-8,
Mularkey 1-5.
JaKe
|
18.600 | reply ***600*** | PFSVAX::JACOB | Re-Elect NOBODY!!!!! | Tue Oct 30 1990 22:46 | 9 |
| The Steelers have outscored their opponents, 118-68 over the last 4
games, in which their record is 3-1. In the 3 wins, they have
outscored opponents 111-41.
Aaron Jones' broken foot was operated on today for the insertion of a
pin.
JaKe
|
18.601 | Stoned out of his Bounds !!! | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Wed Oct 31 1990 11:14 | 24 |
|
Just an observation after a soothing win. Does Dwight Stone have any
balance or sense of direction once he has gotten a defender beat for
the long touchdown??? Twice the end zone celebration had all but started
only to be twarted by that little field border. Of course I'm not one
the field running for my life as he might be but I think I might give
myself a clear foot or five along the sideline.
David Johnson has really looked good at that corner opposite Woodson.
Everybody appears to be giving Woodson his respect and throwing at DJ
but he has made them eat those balls. I believe he did get a pass int.
call in 4 qtr but that was on a play where he and Carnell Lake really
ripped the LA receiver in half.
First half could have certainly been better had the offense been in
sync but the second half could be really nice. What's the status of
Worley? The local press(Atlanta) has been low key thus far on the
coming game, it's still been basking in victory over the Sincy
Bengirls.
Atlanta Updates as they come this week !!! Steelers can't lose this
game or I will nver hear the end of it.
Roy L.
|
18.602 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | W.Va.StateSong=I'm My Own Grandpa | Wed Oct 31 1990 23:06 | 11 |
| Re-.1
Stone said that he lost his balance when he made his last move to get
by a defender and that he couldn't get it back until it was too late.
Seems to me somebody should insert a gyroscope into his head since he's
blown two TD's by steppeing OB with nobody touching him and clear
sailing ahead.
JaKe
|
18.603 | Steelers in first, Glanville bites the dust | ATLAST::MEDVID | Dump Jesse Helms | Mon Nov 05 1990 10:34 | 15 |
| Ahem. Ladies and Gentlemen, it's a whole new ballgame:
Pittsburgh 5-4
Cincinnati 5-4
Houston 4-5
Cleveland HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
We were watching the game on satelite in Charlotte. Satellite feeds
have no comercials, no nothing. At the end, after the network had cut
away, Jerry Glanville was running off the field and tripped and fell
right near the archway. He got about 10 cups of beer dumped on him.
On anyone else, I would never condone this. On Jerry...well he's lucky
the people didn't have grenades.
--dan'l
|
18.604 | Rising team in slumping division | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Nov 05 1990 11:48 | 25 |
|
RE:
Jerry said in the mornings paper he was "clipped by a security guard
and no call was made."
After a tense first half the real men in black stepped up a notch. I
had the pleasure of watching the game with one of the finer steeler
fans in the country yesterday, big Jake himself. Yesterday's first
half sent bleak reminders of games 2-4, but with the offense finally in
sync you didn't feel like the steelers were out of the game at all.
Granted it helped to have the missed field goals but the defensive
backs held good to their promise that there would not be a passing
touchdown thrown against them in this game. I may be losing my memory
but I don't ever recall a pass from the falcons even entering the
endzone, let alone getting caught.
It feels good to be in first and rising as opposed to being like the
bengirls, first and sliding.
Quick Fact:
Steelers defense hasn't given up a touchdown in 8 quarters.
Roy L.
|
18.605 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | National 1990 Rodeo Sex Champion | Mon Nov 05 1990 12:33 | 7 |
| Dan'l
Did they show Galnd(less)ville trying to suck up the beer off of the
carpet?????
JaKe
|
18.606 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | take a DUMP on JESSE HELMS!! | Mon Nov 05 1990 12:51 | 5 |
|
JaKe
|
18.607 | Leavin on that Midnight Train To Georgia | SHALOT::MEDVID | Dump Jesse Helms | Mon Nov 05 1990 12:59 | 20 |
| Jerry probably couldn't get back up because his belt buckle weighed too
much. Is this guy a first class redneck or what?
If he did suck up the beer, it was the only think he or his team sucked
up all day.
For those of you who didn't get to see the game, you missed another
classic Jerry tirade. In a crucial drive, Rozier fumbled but the whole
play was obscured by players. The Steelers came up with the loose ball
and "after further review" the play stood.
Jerry was throwing cups of water, pointing fingers, running out onto
the field, and basically being immature (surprise). On the replay it
was clearly a fumble. The ball was at Rozeir's feet even before he was
halfway to the turf.
And where was Nipplehead Sanders when Warren Williams ripped the 70
yard run? Probably checking his coif in Jerry's belt buckle.
--dan'l
|
18.608 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Nov 05 1990 14:09 | 12 |
| Definately a great weekend for my Black and Gold teams. CU scores 27
4th quarter points against arch rival Nebraska and then the Steeler's
scored 21 points in the 2nd half against Jerry ex-Housscum Oinkler
Glanlessvlle's team.
Can anyone fill me in on the game highlights ? It's hard to get news about
the Steeler's out here in Colorado and it'll be a long time until my
Steeler's Digest arrives.
Go Black and Gold !!
Keith
|
18.609 | Brief Synopsis | PFSVAX::JACOB | National 1990 Rodeo Sex Champ | Mon Nov 05 1990 15:04 | 23 |
| The Steelers got behind 9-0 in the first half. Had the ball in the
1sty half for something like 9:30 and only had 79 yards.
The secodn half was another story. They scored their 21 pointslike
this:
3rd Quarter Atlanta's Greg Davis missed a 40 yd field gaol and on the
first play from scrimmage, Brister connects with Derek hill for 66
yards and a first down at the Atlanta 11. 2 plays later, Brister fires
a strike to Lipps for an 11 yd TD.
4th Qtr Larry Griffin intercepts Chris Miller and returns it 24 yards
to the Atlanta 36. The drive went the 36 yards in 4 plays with the TD
coming when Mularkey went in motion, and then took the pass from
Brister at the 12 and, with a block from Louis Lipps went in for the
score.
Also in the 4th, Bryan Hinkle recovered a Mike Rozier fumble and 3
plays later, on third and 1 at the Steeler 30, Warren Williams broke
thru a bunched up Falcon defense and waltzed 70 yards for the final TD.
JaKe
|
18.610 | What I remember | SHALOT::MEDVID | Dump Jesse Helms | Mon Nov 05 1990 15:14 | 41 |
| OK, Keith, here's what I remember between sips of Rolling Rock.
The Steelers started out poorly and got worse. Glanville actually had
a half descent strategy for special teams. Don't let Woodson get the
kickoffs. The opening kickoff went to Larry Griffin at about the 25
yard line. Larry promptly coughed it up. But Atlanta could only turn
that into a field goal.
In fact, Atlanta controlled the ball for 21+ minutes in the first half
and only scored 9 points (and missed one field goal). The Pittsburgh
defense was awsome. Just like the SF and LA games, they gave up the
short pass and nothing long. Atlanta was able to run on them, but not
for any game breakers.
The turning point came at the end of the first half. Atlanta was
driving in the final two minutes for what could have been at least
another field goal. Chris Miller threw one up and Woodruff made a
terrific break on the ball, intercepted and ran it almost for a TD.
Time had expired...and so had the Falcons.
The Steelers were a different team in the second half. The offense was
clicking. Brister is getting good at reading defenses and changing the
play at the line. He burnt Atlanta on a couple deep passes.
The first TD was a bullet to Lipps in the endzone. The second was to
Mularkey who bulled his way into the endzone thanks to a great block by
Lipps. Then came the game breaker. After Atlanta fumbled for the
umteenth time, the Steelers had the ball at their own 30 with 3rd and
1.
The Falcons had their short yardage defense in. Bubby handed off to
Warren Williams with Barry Foster as his lead blocker. 70 yards later
the Steelers were up 21-9. Once Williams broke through the line no one
was even in the picture...literally, he went behind Foster's block and
the next thing he knew there was nothing but green turf between him and
the goal line.
It's good the Steelers have a week off because a lot of them limped off
the field yesterday. Not many of the injuries looked serious, though.
--dan'l
|
18.611 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Nov 05 1990 16:16 | 27 |
| re: last 2
Thanks for fillin me in on the game. It sounds like the Steeler defense is
playing great ball. Yesterday, on the nationally televised game, Bill Walsh
said that the Steeler's were the hardest hitting team in football. Now,
if Brister and the offense can continue to improve, they may have a shot
at returning to the Super Bowl.
Did Worley play ? I've got my doubts about that guy. He looks like a good
back but so do Hoge, Williams and Foster. And then he's fumbled on some
important plays that I've seen. If he continues to be injured and whine
about not getting the ball enough, I think he should be traded. I don't
think the running game will suffer with the quality backs who are eager
to play.
Dan'l, I see in one of your other notes that you went to OU. I was there
from 67-71. My freshman year, they had their best football team ever. Their
record was 10-0 and they played played some team I forgot in the Tangerine
Bowl. It was a great defensive struggle with a final score of something like
52-48. I believe they won and finished the year ranked 10th in the nation.
A guy named Cleve Bryant was the quaterback then and he eventually became
head coach. However, I heard he was fired last year when the team got into
a bench clearing brawl with their opponents. From what you said in your
other notes, it sounds like OU football has been going downhill for a long
time.
Keith
|
18.612 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Whadafa?? | Mon Nov 05 1990 16:22 | 5 |
| Worley once again saw no action.
JaKe
|
18.613 | | 19358::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Nov 06 1990 12:49 | 21 |
|
A little late, but I'm glad to see the Black and Gold win again.
I didn't see the game, but from what I have read, it wasn't pretty,
but they still get a win.
It looks like the Steeler secondary is becoming more confident
each week. They have really shut down some potent offenses with
some great secondary play. I still think that the lack of a pass
rush will hurt them in the end, but who knows.
It the Steeler's win their division (still a loooong way to
go), I don't see how Noll wouldn't get coach of the year. Panic
reigned in the early weeks, but now they are playing really well.
Looks like the second half of the season will be real interesting..
and I'll be back in Western Pa. for Christmas! I only hope the
Steeler's will be headed for the playoffs by then!
bill..g.
|
18.614 | Lambert/Harris HOF poster available | 34223::MEDVID | Dump Jesse Helms | Tue Nov 06 1990 13:20 | 12 |
| If you write to the Steelers PR office, you might be able to get a
limited edition Hall of Fame Poster.
Send a request to:
Pittsburgh Steelers Public Relations Office
300 Stadium Circle
Pittsburgh, PA 15212
Later.
--dan'l
|
18.615 | confused? | 8269::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Nov 07 1990 12:27 | 9 |
| re-.611 Walsh is funny, because he also said the same thing about the
Raiders being the hardest hitting team. If I remember right, he said
something to the fact that the raiders are probably the only AFC team
that can compete against the 9'rs in the SB.
Too much.....
Tim
|
18.616 | | CELTIK::JACOB | InGod I Trust, All others pay cash | Wed Nov 07 1990 14:52 | 7 |
| OG Terry long spent Monday night in the hospital with a concussion
after his pickup truck went off the road and flipped. He is expected
to play vs. Sinsinati on Nov 18
JaKe
|
18.617 | 2nd half prediction 6-1 | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Nov 08 1990 11:16 | 37 |
| First half+1 analysis:
It took time to put the pieces together. Obviously a team of youth, tenacity,
and growing confidence. Ends with 2 game win streak. Learning situation in S.F.
should we meet again in the post season. Defense hasn't given up a td in 8
quarters. Injuries that did occur only caused other team members to reach with-
themselves for pride and performance. Still could use a little more pop in the
pass rush.
Steelers remaining schedule:
TEAM Where Record Streak Comments
Cincinnati Away 5-4 2 Lose Streaky you never which team will show
New York (Jets) Away 4-5 2 Win Coming around, plays much better at home
Cincinnati Home 5-4 2 Lose Nice to have a twin killing!!!!
New England Home 1-7 Never recovered from the Bears superbowl shuffle
New Orleans Away 3-5 1 Win Aints are unpredictable,plenty of talent
Cleveland Home 2-7 4 Lose 42-0 loss to bills tell the story
Houston Away 4-5 2 Lose Potent offense, scoring impotence
Second half forecast:
Could easily be 7-0 but throw in a bad break or two. Worleys return should help
the running game a tad now that the offense is in sync.
2nd half Overall
6-1 11-5 Steelers AFC Central Champs
Make your second half prediction:
Steelers 11-5
Bengals 8-8
Houston 7-9
Cleveland 3-13
Pittsburgh looks like the only one of the four teams who've bitten off the
tough part of its schedule. According to last year records 2nd toughest in the
league.
|
18.618 | 10-6 & AFC Central title | CELTIK::JACOB | In God I Trust, All Others Pay Cash | Thu Nov 08 1990 11:49 | 16 |
| Roy,
Although the Steelers COULD conceivably end up 12-4 or 11-5, if they
continue to play the way they have since the 1-3 start, I think they
are unbeatable by any team on their remaining schedule. I figure the
team to have a let down or two and that will serve to keep them in the
proper prospective. I predict that they will finish 10-6, on top of
the AFC Central, and I think they'll pay the Raiders back in the
playoffs.
The Pirates returned to the playoffs against an old foe, the Reds, this
year and I figure the Steelers, barring and injury riddled 2nd half, to
return and play a foe of the '70's also, the Faiders.
JaKe
|
18.619 | | CELTIK::JACOB | In God I Trust, All Others Pay Cash | Fri Nov 09 1990 14:21 | 10 |
| Just wanted to extend my thanks to Roy Quinn for setting me up with
this account while I've been in Atlanta so's i could access notes
and not have to wait 39 minutes from the time I hit next unseen until I
got to see the next reply.
Thanks again
JaKe
|
18.620 | Houston Pitt fight for top | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Fri Nov 16 1990 13:39 | 3 |
| Im new to the Steelers Notes file, but I have to agree that they
will finish with 10 or 11 wins, but I think Houston will come back
and give them a run for the top finishing with 9 or 10.....
|
18.621 | Steelers by 7 | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Fri Nov 16 1990 16:09 | 14 |
|
I read today in the local rag that Worley is ready to go. Any word
from around the Pitt.? The tidbit seemed to indicate that he would be
starting.
I tell you what there's nothing like the steelers clashing in a night
game. Their last three appearances, Houston, Houston, and L.A. Rams
were certainly to my delight. The black and gold should be polished
after a little time to rest and gather for the stretch run.
Steelers 24 Cincy 17
Roy L.
|
18.622 | No Passing Zone | SHALOT::MEDVID | try me on, I'm very you | Fri Nov 16 1990 16:23 | 20 |
| > I tell you what there's nothing like the steelers clashing in a night
> game.
Black and gold do not clash. Those colors go together quite well.
If anything clashes, it's orange and [insert any color].
On the cover of this week's Steelers Digest is a photo of Rod Woodson,
Tim Johnson, Carnell Lake, and Richard Bell standing next to a
roadblock on the goal line. It's called the "No Passing Zone."
It should also say "No Dancing Zone" because the only dancing woods is
going to do is the "Ow my leg limpoff." He'll spend the rest of the
season on IR.
To be fair, though, Cinci has had time to get over a lot of their
injuries. They won't be as bad as in the past few weeks. It should be
a good one.
--dan'l
|
18.623 | SD's still in the mail | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Fri Nov 16 1990 17:56 | 6 |
|
--dan'l
I stand corrected.
Roy L.
|
18.624 | Bengals are pussies | SHALOT::MEDVID | If I could be God tonight... | Mon Nov 19 1990 10:03 | 21 |
| Good show by the Bengals last night. No show by the Steelers.
The definite turning point was the attempted fake field goal that fell
only a hair short of the goal line. I think Pittsburgh would have
clobbered the Bengals in the second half if they had gotten the
momentum from that play. Instead, just the opposite.
But it was worth the try. Steelers will bounce back. The week layoff
really helped the Bengals heal and take the winning momentum away from
Pittsburgh.
Now that Pittsburgh is back to earth, Noll will shape them up again.
You can count on that.
I think the Bengals will self-destruct. You can only count on catching
the other team with 12 men on the field so many times. When that's the
main ingredient in your offense, sooner or later it will backfire...and
I think it will backfire in a big way...like maybe costing Sam the AFC
Central title.
--dan'l
|
18.625 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | CRS sufferer: Can't Remember $hit | Mon Nov 19 1990 18:09 | 20 |
| The Steeler "D" had troube stopping the Bung(ho)le(tm) ground game
last night. They also suffered from some poor tackling.
Tim Worley looked decent in his return. He had been suffering from a
badly sprained ankle and a hip flexor. He said that the hip flexor was
bothereing him and that without it, he would have scored on the play
that ended up going 38 yards and getting the Steelers a first and goal
at the 9.
The rest of the offense returned to their start of season form. IMHO,
the Steelers just looked flat last night.
The Dancing Dork(tm) got to do his moronic sideline antic last night.
next week, the Jets....
JaKe
|
18.626 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | CRS sufferer: Can't Remember $hit | Mon Nov 19 1990 18:15 | 18 |
| Dan'l
I agree with you on the fake field goal hurting the Steelers.
It appeared to me that David Little was wide open for a split second
and that Stryszinski(sp?) was a little slow getting up and on with the
play. Noll said today that the play was pass first then run if
nobody's open.
The Steelers should have taken the 3 points instead of resorting to
trickery. They were to get the ball at the beginning of the 2nd half
and could have tied it there.
Oh well, rematch in 2 weeks at Three Rivers and Myron Cope was telling
the Steeler fans to remember the noise the Bung(ho)le(tm) fans were
making and to return the favor here in Pgh.
JaKe
|
18.627 | The fake wasn't on | SHALOT::MEDVID | If I could be God tonight... | Mon Nov 19 1990 18:30 | 8 |
| The paper today said that Noll called off the fake field goal. Trouble
was, everybody got the word except Anderson. That's why Stryzinski
paused so long after Anderson followed through. "Oh, the ball's still
here. $hit!!!"
They'll be back.
--dan'l
|
18.628 | The Refs Was Paid off, Sinsy one penalty, yeah right | PFSVAX::JACOB | CRS Sufferer: I Can't Remember Sh!t | Mon Nov 19 1990 21:25 | 53 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 0 0 0 3 3
Bung(ho)les(tm) 7 3 14 3 27
Sin-Woods 5 yd run (Breech kick)
Sin-FG Breech 21 yd
Sin-Taylor 1 yd run(Breech kick)
Sin-Bussey 70 yd fumble return(Breech kick)
PGH-FG Anderson 31 yd
Sin-FG Breech 33 yd
Team Stats:
PGH SinSinati
11 1st Downs 20
18-94 Rushes-yds 40-178
112 Passing yds 134
14-27-0 Comp-att-int 10-16-1
0 Sacked-yds lost 0
5-33.6 Punts-avg 1-33
1-1 Fumbles-lost 0
8-67 Penalties-yds 1-5
25:08 Time of Possession 34:52
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
STEELERS:Worley 10-55, Hoge 6-36, Stryzinski 1-8, Lipps 1-(-5)
Sinners: Brooks 20-105, Esiason 5-31, Woods 8-23, Taylor 4-8, H.Green 2-6,
Jennings 1-5.
Passing:
STEELERS: Brister 14-27-0 112 yds
Sinners: Esiason 10-16-1 134
RECEIVING:
STEELERS: E.Green 4-46, Hoge 4-1STEELERS: E.GreBell 2-9, Mularkey 1-21, Stone
1-1.
SINNERS: Kattus 3-63, Brown 3-26, Woods 2-17, Taylor 1-20, McGee 1-8
Interceptions: Pgh T.Everett 1
JaKe
|
18.629 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | CRS Sufferer: I Can't Remember Sh!t | Mon Nov 19 1990 22:15 | 96 |
| (From today's Pittsburgh Press, by Gene Collier, without permission)
Found this amusing:
A FURTHER LOOK SHOWS REFEREES ABLE TO GET IT RIGHT
It might not have looked like much, whatever that was the Steelers were
dragging across some three hours of prime time, and maybe it was hopeless ESPN
addicts yearning for volleyball and pocket billiards, but last night's Key
Intradivisional Clash was at least noteworthy on several fronts.
Or notorius on several fronts.
-It brought back to the national consciousness the Ickey Shuffle, a
throbbing toothache for the mind triggered when Cincinnati running back Ickey
Woods scores and then runs to the sidelines and dances, or something like it.
Riverfront Stadium erupts in delirium, making all paying customers eligible for
free outpatient treatment at the Southwestern Ohio Home for the Easily Amused.
-It proved in a fifth consecutive test the ageless football bromide: A
team quarterbacked by a guy named Boomer will beat a team quarterbacked by a
guy named Bubby. For the rematch in two weeks, the Steelers should insist the
quarterbacks use their given names. I don't know if a Walter(Bubby) can
generally take a Norman(Boomer), but it's worth a shot, Right?? No?
-It reaffirmed the versatile genius of commentator Joe Theismann, who
again wowed viewers with his startling insights on topics from math to
meteorology. ON MATH: "The Bengals really want to win this one because there's
a real strong chance of losing 2 (to the Steelers) if you lose at home."
Right. A much, much greater chance than if you win at home.
On meteorology: "I would think that temperatures are going to be changing in
this part of the country as the season goes on." Whoa! Wonder if it has
occured to anyone else? Now that's an analyst!!
-Finally, here it is, 10 games into their season, and the Steelers
still, STILL haven't been involved in a game decided by fewer than 10 points.
I'm just tellin' ya.
But inasmuch as the Steeler would be best advised to forget about last
night as soon as mentally possible, the only element of consequence from the
whole episode was the notion that the National Football League officials might
still be able to achieve actual competence if given the chance.
I know, you thought it was a dead issue. Me too. I figured with
instant replay being what it is, a technological nuisance that undermines
nothing less than the natural basis of the game, that officials had lost all
their normally correct impulses and, by extension, their authority.
Even last night, when Cincinnati's Mitchell Price intercepted a Brister
pass and stepped out of bounds, three officials ran towards each other in a
typically modern dance of the clueless. Nobody wanted to be the guy whose best
judgement would be overturned by the lens.
But one of them had to be. They ruled interception and Price had
planted only one foot in bounds after the catch. 5 years ago, that play would
have had a much more genuine feel to it. Brister made a bad play, a bad
judgement. Price made a fine play, so fine that in the instant judgement of
the official standing closest to it, he had pulled off a critical interception.
Both players would have gotten what they deserved, but now, the officials have
malpractice lawyers in the sky watching them.
And yet apparently, the trend toward de facto lobotomy of the field
officials is highly reversable.
Side judge Deon Look made two calls that were incredibly difficult and
dead solid perfect.
The first came when the Steelers punter-turned-maddeningly slow
running back Dan Stryzinski tried to vault defensive back Barney Bussey st the
goal line in the second period. Bussey hit Stryzinski around the knees,
tilting Stryzinski's chin toward the ground at an angle at which it would have
entered the earth like a javelin had not that part of the earth been carpeted.
While Stryzinski's chin was somewhere in the imaginary plane of the
goal line, the ball was tucked under his right wing several inches behind when
it hit the ground, and Look gave it a great one. He ruled no score.
Later, Look looked ofer a goalline dive by Cincinnati's Craig Taylor in
which David Little popped the ball free a millisecond after it had broken the
imaginary plane. Look ruled touchdown.
What all that shows, I think, is that these guys can still do it and
that they'll do it very well if we can get the malpractice lens out of their
consciousness.
Instant Reply has to go. Write to your local team president, Dan
Rooney, and ask him please not to come up with any last minute inspired
arguments as to why instant replay deserves yet another chance, even if it's
the result of some idea by Chuck Noll.
It was Noll who said replay might be tolerable if reviews were limited
to less than two minutes, and that motion sustained it when last it came to a
vote.
Ironic then, deliciously so, when replay reviewers made Noll stand on
a Denver sideline in excess of two minutes last month while they reviewed a
play that was moot. They were deciding whether a Steelers pass was incomplete,
or complete and then fumbled. But there was defensive holding on the play and
an automatic first down even if the reviewers looked at it long enough to
determine that when you ran it backward, it appeared to contain some satanic
message.
With replay out of the way and officials running the game again with
authority, we all get down to the few remaining nuisances, such as why the
ground can't cause a fumble even though it was perfectly capable of causing
hundreds of them in the first, oh, 50 years of NFL history.
|
18.630 | Flat, cold, and uninspired | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Tue Nov 20 1990 18:53 | 15 |
| re: -2, -3
I tend to agree with dan'l although the fake was taken off, I a
score(7) at the end of the first half would have done wonders for the
teams emotion.
The two weeks off could have taken a bit of the momentum away from the
steelers. They did tackle poorly and just got pushed around on the
defensive line. We needs a dominant d-lineman bad. That goes for
run and pass rush.
Although the jets are playing better they should serve as a game to get
better on.
Roy L.
|
18.631 | LETS ALL DO THE ICKEY SHUFFLE | EAYV01::ATHOMSON | | Wed Nov 21 1990 11:31 | 5 |
| The Squeelers came to the JUNGLE and got mauled.The mighty BENGALS
took them apart,pure and simple.Should be a good game in 2weeks
but the TIGERS will win.
BENGALS FOR THE CENTRAL
|
18.632 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Nov 21 1990 13:52 | 32 |
|
I would agree that the layoff hurt the Steeler's more than it
helped them. They were hot and seemed to be in sync, but as Noll
said, the layoff provided them plenty of time to read their press
clippings.
I also couldn't believe that fake FG attempt. I said, that's
not typical Noll. Noll is more conservative than Barry Goldwater
and for them to try a fake FG was really out of character. There
was no doubt that they should of taken the FG. With only a few
seconds left in the half, what did they hope to gain. If they made
it, great, but if they didn't they would have the Bengals backed
up. But again, with only a few seconds left in the half, this didn't
make sense. The Bengals wouldn't care if they were backed up cause
they could run out the clock with one play, while the Steeler's
would be left without a score. Seeing that this happened, was a
real turning point in my opinion.
For once though my fears were brought out in that the defense
played poorly (as usual against the bengals). So far, the defense
has kept the Steeler's in their games, but if the defense was to
have an off day, I feared that the O would not be able to carry
the team, and I was right. The other big problem the Steeler's
have that became really evident is the fact that they have virtually
no pass rush whatsoever. It seems as though they don't even blitz
anymore. Without pressure, they are doomed because the secondary
cannot hold the fort every game.
bill..g.
|
18.633 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | CRS Sufferer: I Can't Remember Sh!t | Wed Nov 21 1990 17:48 | 12 |
| OK the poop on the fake FG is:
The play went in as a fake FG, but only if David Little sensed the
Bung(ho)les(tm) going for the block. Little signaled to Stryzinski to
ixnay the fake and go with the FG but Anderson didn't hear the
signalling telling him to kick the ball due to the excessive crowd
noise.
Ah well, if it works, their geniuses and when it fails, they're fools.
JaKe
|
18.634 | Steeler 6-5 and tied for 1st in AFC Central | PFSVAX::JACOB | Ronald Reagan's Twin found on Mars | Mon Nov 26 1990 21:15 | 62 |
| Scoring Summary
1 2 3 4 T
Steelers 0 7 3 14 24
Jets 0 7 0 0 7
Jets: Moore 53 yd pass from O'Brien(Leahy PAT)
STEELERS: W.Williams 5 pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS: FG Anderson 33 yd
STEELERS: Hoge 1 yd run (Anderson PAT)
STEELERS: Lipps 3 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
Attendance-57,806
Team Stats:
STEELERS Jets
22 1st Downs 8
37-158 Rushes-yards 20-73
175 Net Passing yds 100
18-24-2 Compl-Att-Int 10-22-2
2-12 Sacked-yds lost 2-22
2-37.0 Punts 5-38.8
8-1 Fumbles-lost 2-0
8-62 Penalties-yds 6-56
39:25 Time of Possession 20:35
Individual Stats:
Rushing
Steelers: Hoge 15-65, Worley 10-32, W.Williams 6-31, Foster 4-22, Brister 1-8
Stryzinski 1-0.
Jets: McNeil 7-28, Baxter 8-24, hector 4-18, O'Brien 1-3.
Passing
Steelers: Brister 18-24 2 interceptions, 2TD's 187 yds
Jets: O'Brien 9-17 2 int, 1 TD 117 yds, Eason 1-5-0 5 yds.
Receiving
Steelers: Lipps 5-65, Worley 3-20, Hoge 3-18, Mularkey 2-37, E.Green 2-25,
Stone 1-10, Bell 1-7, W.Williams 1-5.
Jets: Toon 4-31, Moore 1-53, Mathis 1-23, McNeil 1-9, Boyer 1-5, Baxter 1-2
Hector 1-(minus 1)
Fumbles:
Steelers: Hoge 2, Mularkey 1, J.Williams 1, Woodson 1, Brister 1, Blankenship 1
Worley 1.
Jets: Townsell 1, Eason 1.
Interceptions
Steelers: Griffin 1-36 yds, Little 1-35 yds.
Jets: McMillan 1-0yds, Stargell 1-0yds
JaKe
|
18.635 | Bring on the Bung(ho)les(tm) | PFSVAX::JACOB | Ronald Reagan's Twin found on Mars | Mon Nov 26 1990 21:17 | 31 |
| The Steelers fumbled 8, count 'em 8 times yesterday, but lost only one of those
fumbles. One of the "fumbles" was a quick kick by Ken O'Brien that hit Rod
Woodson's foot. Woodson promptly picked the ball up and ran 12 yards before
being knocked out of bounds.
Brister threw 2 interceptions yesterday but also threw 2 touchdown passes.
Carlton Haselrig's illegal block on a Jet who was not close enough to touch Rod
Woodson cost Woodson and the Steelers an 87 yard kickoff return on the opening
play of the game.
Dan Stryzinski, the Steelers punter, was involved in a strange play for the
second straight week. Faced with a 4th and 3 on the Steelers inital
possession of the second half, Brian Balnkenship one-hopped the snap to punter
Stryzinski. By the time Stryzinski picked the ball up, John Booty of the Jets
was in his face. Stryzinski started to run forward with the ball and Booty
grabbed him but Stryzinski spun and heaved the ball to David Johnson who took
off with it and went around left end for 9 yds and a first down.
Four plays later, Merrill Hoge took a handoff from Brister and started to run
towards the right end of the line, but stopped and turned around and threw an
overhand lateral, on one hop, to Brister. Brister fielded the bounce pass,
which Hoge says was intentionally one-hopped, and looked for two of his
receivers on the left side but they weren't open. Brister then spotted Mike
Mularkey on the right side and heaved a "Moon Ball" to him for a gain of 28
yards.
JaKe
|
18.636 | Thanks there, Tom | SHALOT::MEDVID | If I could be God tonight... | Thu Nov 29 1990 11:59 | 12 |
| Tom Dooley and his officiating crew were reprimanded by the NFL for not
penalizing Cincinnati for an illegal substitution November 18 against
Pittsburgh.
The Bungholes were not penalized after sending three wide receivers
onto the field and then snapping the ball without giving Pittsburgh
time to substitute on defense.
The officiating in that entire game stunk...and they get "reprimanded."
Ol' Tom lives right here in Charlotte. Maybe I'll give him a call.
--dan'l
|
18.637 | (8^)* | PFSVAX::JACOB | We All Become Forefathers, By & By | Thu Nov 29 1990 17:37 | 6 |
| Hang down your head, Tom Dooley,
Hang down your head and Cry!!!!!!
JaKe
|
18.638 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Nov 29 1990 18:02 | 4 |
|
Jake... you are going down... the Steelers will NOT finish 10-6 or
better... I trust the check will be in the mail shortly?
|
18.639 | We'll see in the coming weeks | CELTIK::JACOB | Heya-Heya-Heya-Hiyo | Thu Nov 29 1990 20:33 | 15 |
| >><<< Note 18.638 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Groaner:
Your personal name says it all, re-.1, you're a dreamer. Should have
made a wager on how many games the Brown(spot)s(tm) would win from here
on out. I say maybe 1, nah, make that 0, they already played the
Donks!!!!
I still got a good shot at having you send me a check. I still say
they'll finish 10-6 cause I figure they can go 4-1 from here out.
JaKe
|
18.640 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Nov 30 1990 17:13 | 2 |
|
10-6... right... always the dreamer!
|
18.641 | Time to grow up, Bubby | SHALOT::MEDVID | November spawned a monster | Mon Dec 03 1990 11:09 | 24 |
| I have never been the kind to blame one player for a loss, but
yesterday's 16-12 loss to the Bengals was as good as any. Brister
played and acted like a high schooler and I lost a lot of respect for
him.
A high school QB knows better than to run out of the pocket in the
endzone and hold the ball for as long as Brister did...and he even had the
opportunity to step out to the 1 rather than get nailed with the safety.
Then when the game was on the line, he brought the Steelers storming
down the field in the fourth quarter using a passing touch he lacked
the whole game. They get to the five yardline and he throws four
incompletes into the endzone...totally uncatchable balls...and then he
jumps around like a baby...come on, Bubby, you're a professional.
The defense, as usual, played well except for getting burned on a great
play action by Norman. The D held Cinci to zero points in the second
half...with a big thanks to Jim Breech.
If Pittsburgh can win the rest of its games, they have a chance at that
third wild card and by the way things look, that game would probably be
in Cincinnati. Ain't that interesting?
--dan'l
|
18.642 | Read 'em and weep, JaKe | SHALOT::MEDVID | November spawned a monster | Mon Dec 03 1990 11:29 | 48 |
| Game Stats
Cincinnati 7 9 0 0 - 13
Pittsburgh 6 0 3 3 - 12
First Quarter
P - FG Anderson 32, 2:55
C - Brown 50 pass from Norman (Breech kick), 5:47
P - FG Anderson 36, 11:48
Second Quarter
C - Safety, Francis tackled Brister in end zone, 7:29
C - Brooks 7 run (Breech kick), 14:30
Third Quarter
P - FG Anderson 29, 11:22
Fourth Quarter
P - FG Anderson 48, 6:37
Att. - 58,200 (at Three Rivers)
C P
First downs 17 16
Rushes-Yards 42-165 20-79
Passing 154 226
Return yards 0 33
Comp-Att-Int 8-14-2 18-40-1
Sacked-Yards lost 2-11 1-8
Punts 3-49 1-18
Fumbles-Lost 3-1 3-1
Penalties-Yards 5-45 7-59
Time of possession 32:43 27:17
Individual Stats
Rushing - Cincinnati: Brooks 20-81, Woods 7-38, Taylor 8-33, Ball 2-13,
Norman 5-0. Pittsburgh: Worley 12-67, Hoge 5-9, Brister 2-2, Foster
1-1.
Passing - Cincinnati: Norman 8-14-2-165. Pittsburgh: Brister
18-40-1-234.
Receiving - Cincinnati: McGee 3-76, Brown 2-61, Riggs 2-11, Holman
1-17. Pittsburgh: Lipps 7-97, Hill 3-46, Mularkey 3-28, Calloway 2-30,
Hoge 2-30, Green 1-3.
Missed Field Goals - Cincinnati: Breech 34, 45.
|
18.643 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Dec 03 1990 13:20 | 16 |
| I agree with Dan'l. Bubby blew it yesterday. His passing was great
for 10 and 15 yard gains but when it came to big plays, he stunk. I can
think of at least 3 times when a Pittsburgh receiver has his man beat for
a sure touchdown and Bubby overthrew him by at least 10 yards. On the
final 4th down, it even looked like Bubby was trying to throw it away as
nobody could even touch the ball.
The Steeler defense looked very good. I watched the game on a satellite
feed that didn't have any sound. Sometime in the second quarter, the
Bengals had 3rd and short and the Steeler defender(Loyld) tackled the Bengal
runner for a 4 yard loss. It looked like a Steeler defensive back who was
nowhere near the play was called for a penalty. The Bengals then went on
to score what turned out to be the game winning TD. Can anyone fill me in
on the details of that play ? Why was Pittsburgh penalized ?
Keith
|
18.644 | | REFINE::ASHE | b-b-b-baby... don't forget my lipsync | Mon Dec 03 1990 13:27 | 2 |
| Why didn't they try to kick the FG with 2:30ish left to play? It would
have put them down by 1 and they did get the ball back...
|
18.645 | El Yucko!!!! | PFSVAX::JACOB | We All Become Forefathers, By & By | Mon Dec 03 1990 14:09 | 6 |
| Brister 18-40, Sheeeeeeeeeeeeez!!!!
Thanks for putting the stats in, Dan'l!!
JaKe
|
18.646 | Another Pro-Cinci Ref's Hose Job | SHALOT::MEDVID | November spawned a monster | Mon Dec 03 1990 14:35 | 29 |
| > It looked like a Steeler defensive back who was
> nowhere near the play was called for a penalty. The Bengals then went on
> to score what turned out to be the game winning TD. Can anyone fill me in
> on the details of that play ? Why was Pittsburgh penalized ?
Carnell Lake was called for an "illegal hands to the face." A bogus
call that I failed to see even after two replays.
I tried to keep this out of my initial reply, because if Brister would
have done his job we could have overcome the refs' hose job. Even
bigger than that call (it might have been on that same "drive") came
when a Bengal receiver caught the ball, was tackeled be a Steeler,
bounced two yards and the refs spotted the ball there, not where he
initially hit the ground. This gave Cinci a first down.
By my interpretation of that mark, if this guy had enough momentum to
keep rolling, he could have rolled 30 yards into the endzone for a TD.
Bogus. Even Trumpy (who is usually pro-Cinci) was commenting on how
generous the refs had been to the Bengals all day.
RE: why not kick a FG?
Us Monday morning quarterbacks are all saying this. But at that time,
I was thinking TD all the way too. Too bad Brister wasn't. Those
balls he threw into the endzone couldn't have been caught by Kareem
standing on Patrick Ewing's shoulders. How can you miss a target like
Eric Green?
--disgust'd
|
18.647 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | U can be happy, if U have mind too | Mon Dec 03 1990 14:47 | 9 |
|
When they were at the eight I was thinking go for it with two downs but after
they took the five yard penality I thought they should have kicked. Especially
considering they had two TO's plus the two minute warning. It was pretty
obvious that Norman and the boys weren't going to move the ball...
If only Bubby would grow up....
mike
|
18.648 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Dec 03 1990 16:38 | 38 |
|
I didn't see the game and am only commenting on what I've heard
or read.
Again, the bungle in the 4th is clearly again, not typical Noll.
I've seen it a number of times this year and now it happens again.
In the old days, Noll would of taken the 3 and let the D force the
other team to a 3 and punt. Get the ball back and kick the winner
from about 40-45 out. At the very least, with a first and goal
from the 5, the "old" Steelers would of tried at least 2 running
plays before they panicked into a pass. But here we have bubby
attempting 4 passes. How about up the gut two times? At least
the ball would be closer and with a 3rd and inches or at least one,
a good play fake would make the D bite and Bubby could of run it
it himself!! I think with Williams, they could of scored on the
run and frankly, I'm amazed that they didn't try to run it in.
And true to form, Bubby again stinks out the joint. I guess
I wouldn't hate his guts so much if he knew when to tuck it in and
run with it once in a while, or get rid of it when in trouble.
There is no reason to take a safety (on a roll out??) inside the
endzone...throw the thing away!! Better yet, run a screen or a
draw.
From where I sit, this one really hurt. Now the Steeler's have
not only failed to beat a good team, but they have lost 3 out of
4 divisional games with only 2 remaining. Even if they end in a
tie, they will loose because they have a terrible divisional record.
This was the biggie. It would of meant out-right first place and
they just couldn't muster up the gutz...and it was also for Noll's
200th coaching victory. If those two things don't get you excited
then you'd better find another line of work..
It looks like a 8-8, or at the best, a 9-7 year...ho hum. Another
year of "only if.."
bill..g.
|
18.649 | Bengals weren't much better | SHALOT::MEDVID | November spawned a monster | Mon Dec 03 1990 16:55 | 22 |
| > From where I sit, this one really hurt. Now the Steeler's have
> not only failed to beat a good team, but they have lost 3 out of
> 4 divisional games with only 2 remaining.
I wouldn't flatter the Bengals and their fans by calling them a good
team. Except for two big pass plays, they didn't show me much on
offense and Brister was their best player on defense. Munoz is the
only "thing" worth noting.
They failed to move the ball effectively in the second half. Another
reason for the Steelers to go with the field goal on 4th down.
Who knows?
One thing I'll put money on is if the Bengals win the Central and have
the worst of the three division winner records, they will play the last
place wild card team and lose.
A few weeks ago, the AFC Central looked tough...now it looks like a
joke. And the rest of the conference is licking their chops.
--dan'l
|
18.650 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 03 1990 18:38 | 4 |
|
Ahem... Jake... is the check in the mail?
|
18.651 | Not so fast, Groaner | CELTIK::JACOB | Heya-Heya-Heya-Hiyo | Tue Dec 04 1990 09:46 | 12 |
| The Steelers have not beaten a team this year that has a winning
record.
Re-.1
I still have some hope. Their 6-6 now and maybe a miracle will happen
and they'll get their heads out of their asses and play the football they
played in weeks 5-9. They play the Patriots this week so I should be
able to hold onto my money for at least another week.
JaKe
|
18.652 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Rice U - The REAL National Champs | Tue Dec 04 1990 13:51 | 4 |
| FaKe, Gronowski is right. The Steagles are 6-6, and have to lay Houston
in the HoP. Chalk it up as a loss.
Give it up homeboy ....
|
18.653 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 04 1990 14:09 | 2 |
|
The Cash will be hoisted to the wall along with DrMs buck!
|
18.654 | Time for a new name | SHALOT::MEDVID | November spawned a monster | Tue Dec 04 1990 14:17 | 10 |
| re: .652
You're kidding me! They're still calling the Astro Dome the House of
Pain even after Glanville is gone? I think the Edifice of Inconsistency
is more appropriate.
My buddy up in Pittsburgh owns what we call the "Couch of Pain." Sleep
on it one night and you'll know why.
--dan'l
|
18.655 | | CELTIK::JACOB | We all become forefathers, by and by | Tue Dec 04 1990 14:17 | 8 |
| Midracingstripeinyourshorts:
Houscum will be out of it by game 16 and the Steelers will wipe up the
carpet in the a$$holedome with moon's face.
JaKe
|
18.656 | | CELTIK::JACOB | We all become forefathers, by and by | Mon Dec 10 1990 09:26 | 10 |
| The Steelers beat the hapless Pats yesterday, 24-3. It was not a
pretty game for the Black & Gold, though. They turned the ball over a
few times and couldn't seem to get going until late in the third
quarter but they won nevertheless and the AFC Central is again a
logjam, except for the low-life Clevescum Brown(spot)s(tm) who can't
beat their way out of a wet paper bag.
JaKe
|
18.657 | Quite in here for winning? | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Dec 17 1990 19:50 | 3 |
| What about yesterdays game? I heard it was pretty UGLY;^ Well Mike,
I heard Booby had at least another INT. Has he passed your favorite QB
for INTs yet?;^^^^
|
18.658 | Browns are the only consistent team in the division | SHALOT::MEDVID | November spawned a monster | Mon Dec 17 1990 21:18 | 18 |
| Of course we're quiet. We're doing our Whitehair immitation this week.
Even after winning, we're not going to say a word because it doesn't
look good.
If the Steelers win the AFC Central then no one can say they don't
deserve it. Right now, Houston is playing mighty well and I wouldn't
bet against them. Of course, I wouldn't want to be going into Cinci
after their loss to the Raiders.
This is a week-to-week affair. The Cleveland game is never easy. One
Browns fan down here in Charlotte told me, "If we beat the Steelers
Sunday that will make the whole season worthwhile." That's probably
the attitude of the Browns also.
If I was a betting man, I'd keep my money in my pocket when it came to
the AFC Central. Anything can happen.
--dan'l
|
18.659 | Can Pitt clinch this week with help | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 18 1990 11:55 | 5 |
| If Pittsburg can hold on and beat Cleveland and Houston Beats Cinncy
will they clinch a wildcard spot, this would leave them tied with Hou
and 2 games ahead of cinncy, what happens if Sea and Pitt tie for the
last wildcard spot....
Mike
|
18.660 | Kosar doubtful | SHALOT::MEDVID | November spawned a monster | Tue Dec 18 1990 11:29 | 12 |
| Pittsburgh's hopes of beating Cleveland just got worse. Bernie is
doubtful. Darn, I was counting on Greg Lloyd and Gerald Williams
having about 10 sacks and Woodson, Lake, Everett, and Johnson coming up
with some pickoffs. Now they'll have to deal with the better QB Mike
Pagel who will probably have a career day.
Mike, I'm not even going to worry about the playoff picture. I don't
think Pittsburgh can clinch anything this weekend. Now, if Green Bay
would have scored the game winning TD two weeks ago against Seattle
when they had the opportunity, the picture would be much clearer.
--dan'l
|
18.661 | Ok, steelers win, houston wins and seatle loses | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 18 1990 14:54 | 7 |
| What Happen to bernie, I didnt see anything in any of the highlights
showing that he got hert.....But I guess I wouldnt want to play either
if I was him.....And from looking at the Standings if the steelers win
and houston beats cinncy the only team that can tie them is seattle,
and thats if they win both and Pitt loses the last week. Maybe Denver
will give the steelers a present and beat Seatle this week and then
well have a much clearer picture....
|
18.662 | A pox on Pagel! | SHALOT::MEDVID | November spawned a monster | Tue Dec 18 1990 15:23 | 13 |
| Kosar has like a chipped bone in the thumb of his throwing hand or
something like that. Why isn't he doing what he did last year? You
know, "Gee, I'm hurt and I can't throw the ball hardly at all, but I'll
certainly be in there because without me the Browns can't win and it's
up to me and me alone...regardless of how bad my performance is going
to be in these last four games."
I lost a lot of respect for Kosar then. Now I really have little for
him. He can force himself to play even though his elbow doesn't work
(or was it his wrist), but now that there's no glory involved he's
"doubtful" because his thumb hurts.
--dan'l
|
18.663 | brister is a still... they'll probably draft a QB this yaer... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 18 1990 15:30 | 3 |
|
If Pittsburgh had Kosar or Pagel, they'd probably make the playoffs.
|
18.664 | You'll get little argument from me on that one | SHALOT::MEDVID | November spawned a monster | Tue Dec 18 1990 15:36 | 4 |
| If Pittsburgh had anybody but Kosar or Brister they'd probably win the
Super Bowl.
|
18.665 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Got 2 shots, anywhere & anytime | Tue Dec 18 1990 16:24 | 8 |
|
Tim big difference is Bobby is a 3rd round draft pick who wasn't supposed
to be a star or have comic books written about him...Don't know for sure
who's the leader in the inty's parade...
mike
|
18.666 | Steelers get 2 in pro bowl | CELTIK::JACOB | But I don't have $10,000!!! | Thu Dec 20 1990 19:00 | 8 |
| Rod Woodson, arguably one of the best cornerback playing in the NFL,
and David Little, ILB, were named to the AFC Pro Bowl team. For
Woodson, this is the second consecutive year he was selected, although
last year he was selected as a kick returner.
JaKe
|
18.667 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Dec 21 1990 12:18 | 5 |
| I'm surprised that Gary Anderson didn't get picked for the pro bowl as
a place kicker. He's having another outstanding season. Who was picked
ahead of him ?
Keith
|
18.668 | 9-6 with one to go | CELTIK::JACOB | STEELERS=1990 AFC Central Champs | Wed Dec 26 1990 20:05 | 19 |
| The Steelers avenged the 51-0 debacle of last year on Sunday by beating
the Brown(spot)s(tm), 35-0.
The 'Spots turned the ball over 3 times in three offensive plays and
were down 21-0 by the time they could run their 4th play.
Brister threw 4 TD's in the first 16 minutes of the game and Noll set
the Steeler Offense in conservative mode once they wer up 35-0.
The 'Spots ended up turning over the ball 9, count 'em, 9 times in the
game.
Sunday night the Steelers play the Houscum Oilslicks and, with a win,
would win the AFC Central Division title for the first time since 1985.
GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
JaKe
|
18.669 | Steelers, Raiders and Dallas..what year is it ??? | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 27 1990 09:54 | 6 |
| While if the Steelers cant beat the Moonless Oilers they dont deserve
to even be in the playoffs....This should be a auto win for the
steelers and they will win the divsion.....Pittsburg Steelers and LA
Raiders win there divisions, and DALLAS is in the Playoffs, what year
is this ???
Mike
|
18.670 | Black and Gold blacked out | SHALOT::MEDVID | Spiderman is having me for dinner | Thu Dec 27 1990 12:27 | 18 |
| For the second straight week, the Steelers game was not available on
satelite. We missed the game against New Orleans and the
house-packing, pizza-eating, beer-drinking game against Cleveland.
Both these games were not "out there" nationwide.
I'm sure the Cleveland fans were a bit angry Sunday also because the
Browns Backers nationwide are very devoted (though maybe not this
year).
We tuned in the Oilers Bengals game instead. It was amusing watching
the Pittsburgh Cleveland game via the ticker, however. Every ten
minutes, Pittsburgh had seven more points. What a laugh.
All of a sudden, that pay-per-view plan the NFL may have in its back
pocket is looking good. At least you'd be guaranteed of seeing your
game.
--dan'l
|
18.671 | Scrambling put in place? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Dec 27 1990 12:44 | 17 |
|
> For the second straight week, the Steelers game was not available on
> satelite. We missed the game against New Orleans and the
> house-packing, pizza-eating, beer-drinking game against Cleveland.
> Both these games were not "out there" nationwide.
What's going on with this? Have the networks partially proceeded with
their scrambling plans? My brother mentioned that the Steelers-only bar
he frequents in Cincinnati couldn't get the New Orleans game, but word
got around that another bar was picking it somehow from another system
and the whole damn place cleared out in minutes. Needless to say, the
proprietors of the original Steelers' bar couldn't have been too happy
with the NFL and/or the network for losing customers to another
establishment after they made the initial effort...
glenn
|
18.672 | Why the Steelers? | SHALOT::MEDVID | Spiderman is having me for dinner | Thu Dec 27 1990 13:57 | 14 |
| > My brother mentioned that the Steelers-only bar
> he frequents in Cincinnati couldn't get the New Orleans game, but word
> got around that another bar was picking it somehow from another system
> and the whole damn place cleared out in minutes.
The other place was probably picking it up off cable somehow. The same
thing happened here in Charlotte for that game. This bigtime sports
bar was getting the game and lots of people hurried over there.
Apparently something happened in the New England area also since they
were supposed to show that game but at the last minute, Miami and
Seattle was the game on NBC.
--dan'l
|
18.673 | Steeler ramblings.... | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Dec 27 1990 16:38 | 23 |
| Fresh off of my honeymoon I wouldn't have gotten to see the steelers
anyway(football barred for a few days), but all I could muster from
highlights and general comments is the steeler games have been ugly on
offense but pretty decent on defense. The last game I say was the
bengal game in which Buddy would take the win for the asking.
Has Bubby come any closer to his midseason form ? I hope he hits a 5
game hot streak starting Sunday night. Something that has puzzled my a
bit though. The steeler running game appeared to to diminish
considerably from last year. Barry Foster had a 100yd rushing day
against the Browns but what have Hoge and Worley done lately? Worley
been injured a good part of the year but hasn't really performed well
with the given time on the field. I'm sure part of that is Walton's
offense. The 3 yard pass instead of a trap up the middle. A team like
Pittsburg can't pass its way very far in a playoff situation looking at
the other AFC teams already in the playoffs(Buf,Raiders,KC,Mia). Most
of those teams have pretty heavy pass rushes.
Oh well, I guess I should be happy that the W has still gone in the W
column for the last 2 weeks.
Roy L.
|
18.674 | A Great Draft | SHALOT::MEDVID | Spiderman is having me for dinner | Thu Dec 27 1990 21:33 | 20 |
| Interesting article in Steelers Digest this week about Pittsburgh's '87
draft. Here's what it produced:
Rnd Name Pos School Status
===========================================================================
1 Rod Woodson CB Purdue Pro Bowl Selection
2 Delton Hall CB Clemson Three-year starter
3 Charles Lockett WR Cal-St.Long Bch Cut in 89
4 Thomas Everett FS Baylor Established starter
5 Hardy Nickerson LB California Established starter
6a Tim Johnson DE Penn State Started, traded this year
6b Greg Lloyd LB Fort Valley St. Established starter
7 Chris Kelley TE Akron Cut in 87 training camp
8 Charles Buchanan DE Tennessee St. Cut in 87 training camp
9 Joey Clinkscales WR Tennessee Cut in 89
10 Merril Hoge FB Idaho St. Established starter
11 Paul Oswald C Kansas Cut late 87
12 Theo Young TE Arkansas Cut in 88
|