T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
126.1 | RAM simple cycler | TALLIS::FISHER | Kay R. Fisher | Mon Apr 13 1987 15:00 | 19 |
| I got a RAM simple cycler from Tower Hobbies for $15.49 including shipping.
It works for Tx and Rx batteries and there are some hidden costs.
It doesn't come with connectors (cause they don't assume Futaba).
It is a simple little circuit board mounted in a little plastic case.
It discharges and set's off a high pitched tone when it is time to remove
the plug. It won't work on larger batteries such as you might have
for a CAR or an electric plane. You have to manually disconnect it
when it's time or it will just keep discharging too far.
RAM also makes a model for larger (R/C Car type) batteries.
_!_
Bye ----O----
Kay R. Fisher / \
==============================================================
|
126.2 | Digipace | NOFALT::BRUCKERT | | Mon Apr 13 1987 16:28 | 10 |
| I have a DIGIPACE ram cycler. This unit discharges both the receiver
and transmitter sperately and records the time of both. When I come
back from the flying field I put the plane on the unit and determine
the discharge time remaining. If enough time is left, I can put
in more flights next time. I also don't have to worry about forgetting
that the unit is on discharge and thereby damage the unit.
It's also usefull for finding bad batteries.
If your batteries are new you can get allong without one. As your
batteries get older, the risk of a cell going bad increases.
I saw an ad for a similar unit for less money than the DIGIPACE.
|
126.3 | another Ram Cycler | AUTUMN::NOYES | | Tue Apr 14 1987 12:44 | 9 |
|
I also have a Ram Simple Cycler, and have adapted it to work
for my RC car pack. (5 cell hump pack) I will check tonight
and put in a blurb tomorrow about how I changed it. (I had help
from another RC noter, and if he has the info here at work, maybe
he would be able to put it in today.)
Brian
|
126.4 | TAYLOR | DPDMAI::GREER | | Tue Apr 14 1987 20:41 | 22 |
| Tom,
I have had a taylar for the last four years. Also comes without
connectors. The system discharges your batteries, both trans. and
receiver independtly, and at the right point goes into a charge
state. Mah that was remaining in your batteries is logged by two
manual clocks.
I use mine about once a month on all my systems from a full charge.
When they start showing 400 to 450 mah i watch them closely. If
they go below 400 and i can't bring them up i change them out. The
leftovers along with a radio shack charger make great batteries
for your camera strobe, kids toys, receiver packs for cars, etc.
They will usually come back for a few months by running them all
, or close, to the way down and quick charging them a few times.
I use a MENS charger for that. Sometimes i can get as much as 600
on a 550 pack doing this..........
Price back then was in the $70.00 range.......
bob
|
126.5 | Ram Simple Cycler Tip.. | AUTUMN::NOYES | | Wed Apr 15 1987 13:58 | 15 |
|
Re: 2 + 3...Ram Simple Cycler. It can be used for discharging
the 5 cell (7.2v) packs, by simply adding a 10 ohm resistor to the
yellow (Rx) lead before attaching to the pack. I did this by using
Silicone Gasket goop to mount the resistor to the inside of the
cover, and I presently use jumper wires to connect it to the pack.
(Since I don't have the proper connectors yet.) The other lead
from the pack goes to the black wire of the Simple Cycler. Be sure
to remember that there is a polarity to follow when doing this!!
(Hot lead from the battery pack is usually Red.)
For those who were wondering ~~~~~~.....
Brian
|
126.6 | Cycler Questions... | K::FISHER | Battery, Mags, & Gas Off! | Mon Feb 01 1988 20:20 | 33 |
| So Tom what kind of battery cycler did you finally get?
About the ACE Digipace - Balsa USA lists them at 88.99 and they come in 3
varieties.
[20/50 ma rx chg]
[50/120 ma rx chg]
[kit] at $75.99
I assume that the kit can go either way.
Which is the correct charge rate? and if say [20/50] is right for planes
then what is the other rate used for?
Is there two digital readouts for capacity or do you flip a switch to direct
the readout for tx or rx?
Is the Digipace the only auto cycle with simultaneous tx,rx cycling or do
they have other models?
About the taylor units
An earlier note said that they independently do tx,rx. Does that mean
Simultaneously?
Also was stated that they logged Mah remaining by two manual clocks.
What does that mean "Manual Clock"?
The latest Tower add only has one product from Taylor and that is a
Power Pacer 9.6V for $54.99 - is that the cycler were talking about?
_!_
Bye ----O----
Kay R. Fisher / \
================================================================================
|
126.7 | DIGIPACE | LEODLN::SCANTLEN | | Tue Feb 02 1988 14:27 | 40 |
|
Re: .6
I presently own a DIGIPACE, and find it great for care and feeding
of my nicads...
>[20/50 ma rx chg]
>[50/120 ma rx chg]
>[kit] at $75.99
>I assume that the kit can go either way.
I think the kit (like the CHARGEMASTER by ACE) will permit modication for
either charge rates.
>Which is the correct charge rate? and if say [20/50] is right for planes
>then what is the other rate used for?
They plan on a 10% of rated pack capacity for charging, so if you use 1200mah
packs, then the 120ma version would be used. Most std flight packs are
500mah to 550mah, therefore the 50ma rate would be used.
>Is there two digital readouts for capacity or do you flip a switch to direct
>the readout for tx or rx?
There is a single multiplexed led display that reads minutes and tenths of
minutes in discharge time. To see TX or RX, a slide switch is actuated,
for non-destructible readout of either value. You can calculate your
battery pack's capacity by using the knowledge of its original full capacity
(say 500mah) and how long it took to discharge at the internal rate.
>Is the Digipace the only auto cycle with simultaneous tx,rx cycling or do
>they have other models?
A quick call or look in ACE's catalog could answer that, but I think the
DIGIPACE is their prime cycler.
-Mike
|
126.8 | | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Planned Insanity | Wed Sep 28 1988 13:22 | 42 |
| Well, let's wake this note up again since the flying season is on
the wane for many of us.
As I see it, there are 3 choices....
RAM simple cycler - actually this is just a discharge unit and leaves
the timing of the discharge to the operator. Effective but only
marginally useful for those of us that easily forget and leave the
house while discharging the batteries. Also, only one battery may
be discharged at once. Price is still around $15.
Ace digipace - LED output of total discharge minutes. As with the
RAM, you still need to look at charts/mathmatically figure out how
good the battery is. Big advantage here is that at the end of
discharge, it will automatically switch to charge mode. Both Tx
and Rx batteries may be discharge/charged at the same time.
(is this info correct?? What other features does this have??)
Price appears to be $80-$90.
Taylor "power pacer" - This unit also allows both Rx and Tx batteries
to be discharged and charged at the same time. There are red and
green LEDs for each so that you know what is going on in a glance.
It also has a dial readout that shows you the Mah capacity that
the battery had. I presume that you can also get this with various
charge/discharge rates. Last I hear, you could still get one of
these for about $55.
None of the 3 have any connectors, so that is a moot issue. The
Taylor seems to be the best buy. I have used both the Taylor and
the RAM.
Does anyone know how to get in touch with Taylor directly?? I am
willing to put together a group deal if others are interested.
If someone gives me a phone number I will call and find out what
kind of price break we can get. I would then post the price and
ask for participants.
Are there other units that are available that should be considered??
Thanks,
jeff
|
126.9 | Litco Systems Multi-Cycle | RICKS::MINER | Electric = No more glow-glop | Wed Sep 28 1988 14:13 | 39 |
| I have a cycler from Litco Systems and am very pleased with it. It
is their "Multi-Cycle" model and is simialr to the Ace Digipace.
However, it uses 2 LCD displays (one for Tx, one for Rx) instead of
the single LED dispaly of the ACE unit. They claim the discharge
time will be retained even in the event of a power failure since
they use LCD's (they use the batteries you're charging to maintain
the very low current for the LCD's).
It's very simple to use:
Plug it in to the wall
Plug in Tx and/or Rx (Connectors not included)
A small LED lights up for each to indicate "charging" and that
you have made a good connection
Press a push-button to start the discharge cycle
The LED's go out and the digital LCD display starts to indicate
the discharge time
When the Rx and/or Tx discharges, the LCD displays go blank and
the charging LED lights up.
When you want to see the discharge time, press the discharge
button, read the time and disconnect the batteries.
I think the current price for the Multi-Cycler is $69.50. Check
their ad in Model Aviation or RCM. Their ads are usually black
background with white letters.
Litco Systems
Box 90
East Hanover, NJ 07936
_____
| \
| \ Silent POWER!
_ ___________ _________ | Happy Landings!
| \ | | | | |
|--------|- SANYO + ]-| ASTRO |--| - Dan Miner
|_/ |___________| |_________| |
| / | " The Earth needs more OZONE,
| / not Caster Oil!! "
|_____/
|
126.11 | LOVE THAT L.R. TAYLOR......!! | PNO::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) | Wed Sep 28 1988 15:53 | 18 |
| I've used an L.R. Taylor Power-Pacer for 6-7 years now and love
it. More importantly, I trust it implicitly! I particularly like
the direst mah readout; no math conversion to do to determine battery
capacity. I'm not sure whether these are available with various
charge rates; mine charges at 75mah which I find more than adequate
for any/all packs I use.
I break all my charger cords and install Deans connectors so the
cycler can be used on any/all systems I own. I also replace all
my Rx charging jacks with Deans connectors for the reason stated
above. My cycler is interchangeable with all my Rx's and Tx's,
regardless of brand.
|
| | 00 Adios, Al
|_|_| ( >o
| Z__(O_\_ (The Desert Rat)
|
126.27 | | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Planned Insanity | Fri Oct 07 1988 18:51 | 17 |
|
I had heard that somewhere's too, although I can't remember where.
I have yet to hear anyone say what radios are not compatible. As
far as I know, all of the popular models of the popular manufacturers
are fine. If you can take a ESV reading, you can use a cycler.
Well, your info on trickle charging conflicts with the factory.
They guy that I talked to seemed knowledgable about batteries and
seemed to know his product very well. I tend to think the ad might
be wrong.
Model 300, for 9.6V transmitters. I guess I assumed that that was
OK with everyone. Again, there are very few that are not 9.6V.
cheers,
jeff
|
126.28 | NO CYCLER WILL WORK WITH A JR TRANSMITTER PACK.... | PNO::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) | Fri Oct 07 1988 19:53 | 27 |
| Jeff, Ken,
JR transmitters cannot be cycled on L.R. Taylor's or anyone else's
cycler(s). I can't expound the theory as to why but it has something
to do with a diode in the battery circuit as Ken alludes. As I
understand it, attempting to cycle the Tx _will_ result in grievous
damage to the pack and/or related circuitry. For me, this is a
considerable disadvantage and a reason why I don't fly JR...I want
to have a way of staying aware of battery condition and this feature(?)
of the JR Tx prevents that. I don't know whether or not a similar
problem exists with the JR Rx pack but I think it applies only to
the Tx pack.
As far as I'm aware, having used my L.R. Taylor in excess of 6-years
(during which time I've probably saved 3 or more airplanes by detecting
battery problems _on_the_ground_), the Power Pacer does not cycle
down to a trickle charge rate. If it does, it gives no visual (or
other) indication of doing so. I find this to be no disadvantage
whatsoever and tend to agree with the statement offered by the L.R.
Taylor rep that this (trickle charging) may actually be harmful
to NiCads.
|
| | 00 Adios, Al
|_|_| ( >o
| Z__(O_\_ (The Desert Rat)
|
126.29 | MY JR'S CYCLE O.K. | SALEM::COLBY | KEN | Tue Oct 11 1988 13:49 | 16 |
|
Al,
I am not sure what JR transmitter model you are talking about, but
I have both the Century VII and the Galaxy 8 transmitters and have
been using the L.R.Taylor cycler on them since the past Winter
with no apparent problems. I know you have to be careful not to
put too heavy a load on the battery, since it is fused. I do not
remember the value of the fuse, but it is large enough that the
L.R.Taylor cycler does not blow it.
________
/ __|__
=========[_____\>
/ __|___|__/ BREAK A BLADE,
Ken
|
126.30 | RULE #1: NEVER EXPOUND FROM HEARSAY.... | PNO::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) | Tue Oct 11 1988 14:10 | 27 |
| Ken,
Well, I've made the mistake of repeating something from hearsay,
not personal knowledge. If you're getting away with cycling your
JR packs, obviously it _can_ be done. All I can relate (and what
I accepted as gospel) is that my buddy, Chuck Collier, who flies
JR exclusively, has mentioned numerous times that he cannot use
a cycler on his transmitters. (He has an Unlimited-8, a Century-7
and a Computer-8 PCM.) He's referred to a diode (or some such)
in the pack as being the reason and has said that JR advises that
use of a cycler can cause serious damage. Are you doing anything
unique or just hooking up and pushing the button like any average
Joe Scrapmetal might do?
That's all I know and, admittedly, it's hearsay, though it's firsthand
hearsay. I merely accepted Chuck's statement(s) as accurate. If
incorrect, I stand corrected and apologize if I created/added to
the confusion.
I believe my other statements regarding standard Tx and Rx voltages
and cyclers being geared toward these standards to be accurate/true.
|
| | 00 Adios, Al
|_|_| ( >o
| Z__(O_\_ (The Desert Rat)
|
126.33 | I DON'T UNDERSTAND | SALEM::COLBY | KEN | Tue Oct 11 1988 16:33 | 16 |
|
Maybe ignorance is bliss, and I have something amiss with my
JR transmitters, but, I just hooked up the cycler and use it on
the standard charge jack with both my Century VII and Galaxy PCM
and I have had good luck, except that the discharge level on the
transmitters does not get down to 1.1 volt/cell. It only goes to
about 9.2 volts, which I attribute to calibration. It seems
a coincidence that the diode in both transmitters would be shorted
so that this would work, but that may be the case.
________
/ __|__
=========[_____\>
/ __|___|__/ BREAK A BLADE,
Ken
|
126.34 | Cycler should catch shorted cells! | LEDS::WATT | | Tue Oct 11 1988 16:58 | 14 |
| Eric,
How come your cycler didn't tell you that one cell was bad?
My home brew one checks pack voltage and shuts off when 1.1v/cell
is reached. With a RX pack, this is 4.4 volts, so the cycler
won't even start running if one cell is shorted. I have caught
dead cells in one of my packs and in several other people's packs.
I cycle both my Airtronics and Futaba rigs right through the charge
plugs on the plane and on the TX. I would bet that many guys that
don't check their batteries are flying with a shorted cell either
in their TX or RX. In my Airtronics TX, my signal strength is normal
with one shorted cell.
Charlie
|
126.35 | fused [charging] circuits | SPKALI::THOMAS | | Tue Oct 11 1988 17:18 | 12 |
| Interesting Ken that you should bring up the diode in the JR radios...
I had an interesting problem sunday night. I plugged my Century
VII into the changing jack and the LED went on, then off. I checked
the transmitter out on a second changed an no light. Oh hell I thought.
So I opened up the back and for the life of me I couldn't find a
diode in the charging circuit. It appears that it may have had one
at one time but that it was replaced in the factory by a wire jumper.
Tracing the charging circuit back further I found my problem. The
charging circuit runs directly into a fuse. 3Amp. This had blown.
I replaced it.
Tom
|
126.41 | MAYBE WRONG CHARGER KIT? | SALEM::COLBY | KEN | Mon Oct 24 1988 17:45 | 18 |
|
Eric,
It sounds like the comment to charge with the resistor supplied,
but the value of the resistor that was supplied was incorrect.
The ideal charge rate would be c/10 or 1200/10=120 ma. I am
certain that you are aware of this. Not knowing the circuit,
I am not sure what that value would be, but you should be able
to get the correct value from either JR or maybe by a substitution
box and finding it empirically, if it can not be done by just ohms
law. It sounds like the resistor value that was included was for
using it with a 2000 ma pack or 500 ma pack.
________
/ __|__
=========[_____\>
/ __|___|__/ BREAK A BLADE,
Ken
|
126.44 | What rate do you Discharge at? | LEDS::WATT | | Tue Oct 25 1988 10:58 | 11 |
| Eric,
What discharge rate do you use when testing your 1200 Mmah packs?
Also, just a minor correction:A charger charges in ma, not mah.
I have been discharging my packs at C/2 on my home built cycler.
My unit presently can't handle 1200 Mah packs but I plan to upgrade
it since I am going to get into electrics. The new 1700 Mah packs
require more heat dissipation capability in the cycler than mine
has.
Charlie
|
126.48 | THe more I know the More Confused I am | LEDS::WATT | | Tue Oct 25 1988 15:21 | 25 |
| Eric,
I hear you and agree completely with not trusting older packs
in a plane. I find other uses for old cells or ones out of a pack
that has failed. I use them to run my electric fuel pump or let
my kids use them in their walkmans. I have had a couple of shorted
cells show up in 3 year old packs. The corrosion you describe is
usually due to overcharging which blows the vents. I guess defective
seals could cause it without overcharging as well. Lots of cheap
chargers like the ones GE sells overcharge the cells if left on
too long. A cell should never be left on overnight charge at a
rate over .1C or 50 Ma for our normal TX and RX packs.
I plan to investigate battery characteristics with different
charging and discharging this winter. I want to convince myself
whether slow charging is really better than fast charging (done
properly with peak detection). I always slow charge my batteries
for planes, but I don't seem to get tremendous battery life.
I have several packs that now only get about 60% of their maH
rating. Their discharge curve seems to have just gotten steeper.
If I find that fast charging is ok, then I will change over to that
and charge just before flying sessions rather than overnight as
I do now. I'll be sure to put the results of my experiments in
this note.
Charlie
|
126.50 | YER' FLIRTIN' WITH DISASTER, AMIGO.....!! | PNO::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) | Tue Oct 25 1988 16:49 | 23 |
| Kevin,
My friend, yer' playin' Russian Roulette by not cycling yer' packs!
Not only is it _good_ for the batteries, it gives _you_ the peace
of mind of _KNOWING_ the condition/capacity of yer' packs. You
better get in line for one of the LR Taylor cyclers Jeff ordered.
I'd absolutely refuse to fly without the cycler's benefits, now that
I've become used to using it. I can't imagine how I/we ever got
along without this device.
I started cycling batteries nearly 15-years ago when the first
commercial cycler, the "Flite-Life," came on the market. In the
time since, I've not lost a single aircraft to bad batteries though
I've probably averted at least 6-potential crashes by finding bad
cells/packs on-the-ground which is where you _SHOULD_ find them.
I'd have to say the two cyclers I've purchased over the years have
*MORE* than paid for themselves!!!!!!
|
| | 00 Adios, Al
|_|_| ( >o
| Z__(O_\_ (The Desert Rat)
|
126.55 | trickle charge << .1C | CHGV04::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Sun Nov 13 1988 03:43 | 5 |
| Trickle charge is anything under .1C, usually in the .01-.03C
range. While a couple days of this won't hurt NiCads, I still
don't feel comfortable leaving them at even this level
indefinitely (like those rechargable appliances with the charger
bases do). No problem, however, doing this with gell-cells.
|
126.63 | Check what a cycler can do for you! | BTO::NOYES | | Thu Dec 29 1988 10:57 | 45 |
|
Just a note to plug these chargers........I ordered mine in
the last batch, and have used it 4 times to cycle my batteries.
(I bought my radio equipment with a completed plane, and had not
used it since due to my just starting in the hobby. So, the radio
gear and batteries sat untouched for about 8 months.)
After I got the charger, I started cycling...and guess what?!!
You got it, the state of the batteries was pity-full!
Now for clarity, I should tell you that I had charged the TX
and RX both with the factory supplied charger about a week prior
to trying to cycle them. When I hooked up the cycler, the Tx indicator
would not lock on. (When discharging, the red LED should light and
remain on after the test button is pushed.) Mine would stay on
while the test button was pushed, then go out when it was released.
A quick check of the directions told me that the Tx pack had a cell
that was Below the 1.1 volt level! So, I first charged the Tx pack,
then discharged them both together.
The following are the readings I have gotten so far from the
charger "timers" that read the condition of the packs:
Tx Rx
1st discharge 175ma 250ma
2nd discharge 375ma 475ma
3rd discharge 375ma 475ma
4th discharge 400ma 500ma
This proves to me that a Good Quality cycler is a MUST for aircraft
use. If I had relied on the factory charger alone, and tried to
fly my plane, there is no doubt in my mind that I would have had
a fly-away or a crash.
So!!! The purpose of this long winded note is to tell all you
procrastinators that you Need a cycler....it is not a convenience,
it is a necessity!
(I imagine not everyone leaves their radio equipment untouched
for months like I did, but still....do you _Really_ want to take
the chance with you pride and joy??)
Brian_who_now_appreciates_his_cycler!!
|
126.64 | Oops...I just looked it up. | BTO::NOYES | | Thu Dec 29 1988 11:43 | 9 |
|
Correction!!!! to reply .63, I purchased the equipment
in July of 1987...that makes it about a year and a half that
those battery packs had been left alone, not 8 months as I said.
Considering that, it's suprising they weren't completely useless!
Brian
|
126.65 | cycle or die | K::FISHER | Kick the tires, light the fires, and GO! | Thu Dec 29 1988 11:53 | 18 |
| > Correction!!!! to reply .63, I purchased the equipment
> in July of 1987...that makes it about a year and a half that
> those battery packs had been left alone, not 8 months as I said.
> Considering that, it's surprising they weren't completely useless!
Brian - your observation is correct. Nearly everyone who first cycles
their batteries is shocked at how bad they were. In your case and most
others the batteries are not malfunctioning - just need cycling to bring
them back to max capacity. You don't need to wait 18 months to see the
same results. If you have been flying and charging all summer then your
batteries need cycling to eliminate the memory effect that has built up.
Bye --+--
Kay R. Fisher |
---------------O---------------
================================================================================
|
126.67 | YOUSE GUYS SAID A MOUTHFUL | PNO::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) | Thu Dec 29 1988 12:52 | 18 |
| BRIAN, KAY,
Both yer' observations are dead on the "money." I cycle my packs,
just for drill and to have the peace of mind of knowing their state,
anytime they've sat for 6-weeks or so. Also, if flying heavily,
I cycle every 6th-8th flying session to break any 'memory' that
has developed as a result of not exhausting the packs' capacity
before giving them a complete recharge.
Brian, I'd still be suspect of the Tx pack that's showing only 400ma.
If further cycling doesn't pump the pack up to at least 500ma (I'm
sure it's a 550ma pack), I'd dertainly replace it.
|
| | 00 Adios, Al
|_|_| ( >o
| Z__(O_\_ (The Desert Rat)
|
126.71 | Trickle Trickle | LEDS::WATT | | Thu Dec 29 1988 19:48 | 13 |
| I have been giving trickle charging some thought myself. I find
that I often end up charging my batteries and then not flying due
to weather conditions then repeating this a week later. I am thinking
of building a trickle charge station to keep my TX and RX packs
on constant charge so that I don't have to charge them unnecessairly.
From what I've read, 5 ma is a good number to keep a fully charged
pack peaked without hurting anything. A normal overnight charger
puts out ten times this. I don't think that it's a good idea to
leave your fully charged batteries on normal charge for more than
a day. If anyone has any comments on this, please add them.
Charlie
|
126.74 | I'm looking for ideas | LEDS::WATT | | Fri Dec 30 1988 19:58 | 10 |
| Eric,
How does the auto trickle work? Is it timed or sensed somehow?
WHat do they use for the charge and trickle currents? I'm in the
process of making my own charger and I'm trying to decide what features
to add. Right now, I'm leaning toward doing either a timed charge
with a switch to trickle or just a manual switch to select charge
or trickle.
CHarlie
|
126.76 | Head for the mountains | LEDS::COHEN | | Tue Jan 03 1989 14:14 | 13 |
|
Charlie,
I'll bet it uses Peak detection to trip to the lower charge rate.
Peak detection works great for high-rate charging my flight packs,
but there is no reason why it wouldn't work just as well at a much
lower rate when charging radio packs. The only problem I could
forsee is that due to the lower charge rate, the rate of change of
voltage as you approach peak is probably slower, but if you are
looking for the change in slope with your microcomputer and an A/D
converter, that should not pose any problem for you.
Randy
|
126.77 | Some of my Test Results.. | LEDS::WATT | | Thu Jan 05 1989 00:28 | 33 |
| Randy,
I don't think that you could reliably detect a peak at the normal
50 ma charge rate. I bet that the thing is a timer of some sort
designed to give you 12 hours at normal rate and then drop in a
resistor to reduce the rate. I've been getting some interesting
charge voltage curves with my micro charger interface. I have been
tripping the stop at 10 mv per cell below the peak and it seems
to work well. The cells charge at a pretty constant voltage and
then the voltage shoots up a couple of minutes before peaking out
and starting to drop. I think that you could shut off early if
the rate if increase was sensed instead of the drop from peak.
By the way, peak charging of a battery pack only works well
if the cells are MATCHED in capacity and state of discharge when
starting the charge. THis suggests that you should trickle charge
your pack if you haven't used it for a while to fully charge all
cells. I cycled one pack that had sat around and the first charge
cycle shut off way early because one cell was still fully charged
and a couple others had self discharged. This resulted in overcharging
a couple of cells more than normal and not fully charging the others.
A trickle charge and another cycle showed normal results. I plan
to trickle charge my high discharge packs when not in use to keep
them balanced.
Some people fully discharge high discharge packs with a load
such as an auto headlamp before charging them. This can really
ruin a battery if they are not equalized by reverse charging some
of the cells. If you can get in and load each cell individually,
it is ok to fully discharge a battery before charging. It's also
ok if the pack is well matched. I wouldn't do it regularly though.
THat also goes for fully discharging a car of plane. Never do this
on purpose since battery life will suffer if the pack isn't matched.
Charlie
|
126.78 | Yes | LEDS::COHEN | | Thu Jan 05 1989 13:40 | 26 |
|
Charlie,
On the subject of charge/discharge of packs with unmatched cells.
I typically "Equalize" my packs once every 6 to 8 charges. This
entails a trickle discharge of the pack, followed by an overnight
trickle charge. A while ago I read something about the way packs
behave when they are fast charged and then highrate discharged.
You are absolutely correct. Because no cell is an exact match for
any other, all cells discharge (under load or otherwise) at
different rates. This could well leave you with some cells
completely "flat" while others of the same pack have substantial
charge remaining. If you peak charge a pack in this condition,
you invariably end up with the charge cycle terminating when the
cell with the highest starting charge reaches peak. This leaves
some cells, potentially, well below maximum charge, a condition
which can have a MAJOR effect on an electric planes ability to
fly. Most people who are heavily into racing cars do the same
thing I do for my planes. You can really see a difference, since
a plane flown on a trickle charged pack typically flys for a
longer time than the same plane, on the same pack, after a few
fast charges. Also, the "deep" cycle of the pack is supposedly
healthier for the cells, erasing any memory the cell may have
started to develop, as well as helping to prevent internal shorts.
Randy
|
126.79 | -< yes yes >- | LEDS::WATT | | Thu Jan 05 1989 20:24 | 17 |
| Randy,
I agree with you but I can add that peak charging an unequalized
pack can be worse than just short charging the cells that were more
fully discharged since the peak detector is looking for a peak that
is generated when all the cells go into overcharge. If only one
cell goes into overcharge first, the peak detector will not stop
the charge until that poor cell gets really overcharged and the
voltage drops enough to simulate the whole battery peaking. And
to make matters worse, the other cells are still continuing to increase
in voltage thus canceling out the peak/drop on the overcharged cell.
The bottom line is that the overcharged cell will overheat and could
be damaged. I strongly support your trickle charge technique.
I plan to do that with my batteries and only quick charge at the
field between flights. My night time charging will be at .1 C rate.
Charlie
|
126.81 | No Simple Answers | LEDS::WATT | | Fri Jan 06 1989 15:39 | 31 |
| Ken,
A 15 hour charge is usually done at .1C or 50 Ma for a 500 mah
pack. This is not a trickle charge that should be done indefinately
but what should be called an 'overnight' charge. It does not hurt
(acording to the battery data sheets) to overcharge at this rate
so you can leave it on longer than 15 hours. However, if you have
a desire to keep your batteries fully charged over weeks or months,
you should use a trickle charge of .01 to .02 C which would be
5 to 10 ma on a 500 mah pack. There are several chargers on the
market that have manual switches to switch to trickle charge and
I think that ACE has one that does it automaticaly. Most cyclers
are not really designed to be especially good chargers since
chargers come with radio systems. They are primarily focused on
the discharge function with timing capability to keep track of the
discharge time to determine battery capacity.
By the way, I talked to a guy at S & R Batteries about charging,
storage, and general care and feeding of nicads. He said that the
best way to store nicads for a long period of time (> 1 month or
so) is to fully discharge the cells. This was a big suprise to
me and I don't know whether I fully accept this as fact. He seemed
to know what he was talking about. He also said (and I fully agree
with this) that the full discharge can only be safely done by loading
each individual cell with a 1.5 volt flashlight bulb. NEVER do
this by connecting a load to the whold pack as you will reverse
charge some of the cells if you do. I would think that either
periodically cycling and recharging overnight or continuous
trickle charging would be the way to store them. If I find out
more, I will let you know.
Charlie
|
126.82 | in the meantime .... | GUSHER::RYDER | | Tue Jan 24 1989 08:52 | 10 |
| re Note 852.0 Build your own RAM SIMPLE CYCLER?????
I would expect that sometime in the next several months one of us will
enter a circuit for a cycler more capable than the Taylor or Digipace.
For a self-stopping discharger see Electronic Design News (called EDN
in your DEC library) 9/5/85 pg 301. Where it refers to an event
recorder, put in a Radio Shack relay (12v coil, 1 Amp @110v AC contacts,
NO [="normally open"]) and control an ordinary electric clock with it.
|
126.89 | pack voltage modifications? | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Thu Apr 20 1989 22:41 | 9 |
| I seem to be cursed with packs of various voltages for different
applications. Anyone know how to modify one of these for different
pack voltages, so that the readout is correct. Ideally, I'd like
some sort of switch on the unit to select from 4.8, 6.0, 7.2, 8.4,
9.6, and 12.0, perhaps the first three on the RX side, and the
last three on the TX side. I'm not worried that the charge rates
won't be right for standard times, as I can compensate for that by
charging for longer times. I just want accurate readouts for any
pack I might test. Thanks.
|
126.90 | making all batteries equal | K::FISHER | Stop and Smell the Balsa! | Fri Apr 21 1989 13:38 | 24 |
| > applications. Anyone know how to modify one of these for different
> pack voltages, so that the readout is correct. Ideally, I'd like
Not sure what you final application is but for my flight line battery
condition monitor (a cheap old LED digital voltmeter) I made up a resistor
load that had two resistors in series for the transmitter and one for
the receiver - I ran the wires form the two resistors to the Futaba
transmitter charge plug but I tapped the center of the resistors for
the voltmeter. So voltmeter readings for a good 9.6 volt battery are
4.8 volts. Same glob of resistors has a plug from a single resistor
to a Futaba receiver plug. In this case the 4.8 volt pack reads 4.8 volts.
You could make packs of precision resistors for all your voltage combinations
and just label the connectors as to what pack they go to. Always expecting
4.8 volts means good. In the case of a JR transmitter I just plug in the
Futaba transmitter plug and the voltmeter now reads -4.8 volts (Don't
do that with your charger!).
Was this at all close to what you were asking?
Bye --+--
Kay R. Fisher |
---------------O---------------
================================================================================
|
126.93 | Wanted L.R.Taylor mod | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Mon Apr 24 1989 23:06 | 15 |
| re: .90
Nope, I think you missed it.
Measuring voltage is no problem. I have a DMM that does quite well
at that, as long as I know what is GOOD and what is BAD.
I want to modify the L.R.Taylor cycler to cycle packs at other
than the standard 4.8/9.6v combinations. The instructions indicate
that they are available in different setups, but I guess this is
the standard. It can't be more than changing the RIGHT resistor,
and it shouldn't be too hard to have a rotary switch to select one
of 3 resistors for the discharge rates. I just need to know what
is the right resistor to mess with. The beast didn't come with a
schematic; I was hoping someone had looked at this mod already.
|
126.94 | ask and you shall [possibly] receive | GUSHER::RYDER | | Tue Apr 25 1989 10:08 | 18 |
| re Note 126.93 POBOX::KAPLOW Taylor mod at other than standard 4.8/9.6v
>> It can't be more than changing the RIGHT resistor, ....
>> I was hoping someone had looked at this mod already.
Sorry, but there *is* more to it than the resistor, namely the portion
that senses when the discharge is done and then switches over to charge
the pack. However, in spirit you are right; it is straightforward to
design and build an N-cell cycler for overnight charging. That was
what I had in mind in reply 126.82. I just haven't done it yet.
The device I have in mind has two rotary switches, two LED's, a phono
jack for generic output connections, a what-to-do switch, and a readout
for the mAh. One rotary selects the number of cells (from one to ten),
and the other selects the original mAh capacity of the pack (from 500
to 15,000). The device would discharge the pack at C/1, display (until
reset) the drained mAh, recharge at C/10 for 16 hours, and then trickle
at C/20 forever. Comments are requested.
|
126.95 | JR strikes again... | CLOVE::IBBETT | Born to hover | Tue Apr 25 1989 18:56 | 14 |
| Thanks for the cycler, Jeff. It works great on my flight packs,
but I seem to be one of the poor folks with a Century VII transmitter
that doesn't like cyclers. I re-read all previous notes about this
problem and noted that the charge socket was reversed (center pin
= -ve), but I also took the TX apart and could not find a diode
anywhere. There was a wire link on the small charger socket board
like Tom's. My symptom now is that I have a reasonably charged TX
battery that refuses to discharge via the cycler...
Anyone got any fresh insights or ideas??
------+------
(Z[]>=====X Jimi.
`--'-`---
|
126.97 | Tnx, good ideas... | NUTMEG::IBBETT | Born to hover | Wed Apr 26 1989 14:41 | 18 |
| Thanks for the advice Eric. Re your item (1), I followed the
instructions for the cycler about "...before plugging the cycler
into the wall socket connect it to the batteries. If the green LED
lights then the plug polarity is reversed...". I had assumed (!) that
I should connect the cycler +ve lead to the red lead on my JR charge
plug, however as noted in [.-many] and from the test described above,
it appears that the JR uses a -ve center pin connection on the charger
jack.
I think I will follow your example of adding a 1/8" jack connected
directly to the TX pack. Having seen the good effect this cycler
has on my flight packs I am determined to be able to cycle the TX
pack too! It occured to me that if I use a tip-ring type 1/8" socket
I will be able to wire it such that the battery is disconnected
from the TX when I insert the 1/8" plug -- just in case I accidentally
have the TX switched on...
Jimi.
|
126.98 | | HEFTY::TENEROWICZT | | Wed Apr 26 1989 15:10 | 13 |
| I purchased an Ace cycler at the WRAM show this year and installed
a TX and RX jack to it. I run also run JR radios. It didn't seem
to work right and after trying it two or three times I got nothing.
I then tries to change the TX on a std. JR changer and got no red
LED. I'd seen the "no red LED" before so I checked the 3Amp fuse
in the TX charging circuit and sure enough it was blown. I then
gave the cycler to a sparky in my club and he told me that the JR
runs a reverse polarity. On the Ace this means that the red lead
from the cycler connects to the black lead of the JR charging
jack. Once we did this and replaced the fuse everythings been great.
Tom
|
126.100 | Jimi's Adventures in Battery Land | CLOVE::IBBETT | Born to hover | Mon May 01 1989 17:33 | 19 |
| ...or "Curiouser and Curiouser"...
So I added the new 1/8" socket (3 connector normally closed type)
such that with no plug in the battery is connected to the TX, and
with the plug in the battery is disconnected from EVERYTHING except
the socket/plug itself. I also carefully re-checked the polarity.
The battery will charge, but STILL WILL NOT DISCHARGE. Pushing the
button lights the red led only while the button is pushed. The battery
voltage, however, measured at 10.4-ish, so it should cycle OK.
I also wired up a connector lead for my Futaba 3 channel car radio.
That one charges and discharges perfectly (600+maH indicated).
I conclude therefore that there is something "wrong" with my JR
battery. Either a cell is dead or there is maybe a diode wired
within the shrink wrap casing. I plan on finding out...
Jimi.
|
126.102 | Eureka! Cycler finds problem! | FENNEL::IBBETT | Born to hover | Tue May 02 1989 00:37 | 31 |
| re .-1, me too Eric -- this pack is not fully charged, but at 10.4V
should let the cycler discharge it.
Anyway, I found the answer courtesy of Mr Taylors wonderful device.
A bad cell. In fact 2 bad cells.
I got real methodical (at last!). The no-load voltage of the battery
when tested this evening was 10.26V. I attached a DVM and hit the
test button getting a drop to 7.90V, thus the cycler (seeing less
than 8.80V) said "not enough of them volt things" and refused to
continue discharge. At this point I knew I had a bad pack and so
cut it open so I could test each individual cell under load (as
per Mr Taylor's instructions). Average no-load voltage was measured
at 1.270V on each cell. Under test (load) 6 cells showed a drop
to about 1.24V, but one dropped to 0.900V and one to 0.360V!!
Nuff said -- new pack will be bought tomorrow. I plan on getting
a Futaba pack with the PP9 style connectors (as I have in my car
TX) and wiring up the appropriate Rat Shack connector to my charge
socket inside the TX. This will let me swap packs about and make
any future replacement easier.
This obviously ended up being another testimonial to the value of
a good battery cycler...you can bet that mine will be getting heavy
use from now on.
Jimi.
p.s. unfortunately, I am still mystified as to why "some JR's cycle
and some don't", unless the above experience is in some way germane...
|
126.104 | Applying load, and another question | FENNEL::IBBETT | Born to hover | Tue May 02 1989 18:09 | 36 |
| On applying load to individual cells...
Once I had removed the "shrink wrap" and the insulator end plates
I was able to access the contacts for the 4 groups of 2 cells. I
measured the no-load voltage on each group, then measured the load
voltage by simply pressing/holding the test button. This localized
the fault down to 2 of the 4 lots of 2-cell groups. I then carefully
applied a new/sharp #11 blade between the insulation wrap of each
2-cell group so the DVM probe could make contact with the connection
between the in-line 2-cell group. Same procedure was then used for
no-load & load tests on the individual cells, which ultimately found
the 2 bad cells. I had cut the insulation carefully just in case
I found that I could salvage/repair the pack; however I feel that
I will trash this battery and buy a new one. As I'm sure all in
this file will agree, the cost of a new TX pack is immaterial compared
to the potential scenario of an out-of-control copter...
Re .-1, Eric -- I too realized (via this experience) the need/value
of applying a load to determine battery/cell condition. I had
previously thought all was well, as the voltmeter on my TX showed
a reasonable level of charge on the battery (insert a 1/8" plug
into the C-VII's "direct connect TX to RX socket" and the meter reads
battery volts as opposed to RF output level).
One further question for you Taylor owners...
Can I add some sockets to the cycler so as to plug-in a DVM to the
TX and/or RX leads and use the DVM *without* hurting the
calibration of the cycler? I ask because there is a warning
in the cycler instructions not to add/remove too much to/from the
lead lengths (changes resistance?). I suspect that a DVM has a high
enough Ohms per Volt rating so as not to alter the lead resistance
seen by the cycler. My intent is simply to be able to monitor the
pack voltages during charge/discharge...
Jimi.
|
126.106 | the Taylor is not precise; doesn't need to be | GUSHER::RYDER | | Wed May 03 1989 01:08 | 12 |
| re Note 126.104 "use [a] DVM *without* hurting the calibration"
I believe so, but I have not actually verified it. My belief is based
on two items: you mentioned the light load, and the other reason is the
imperfection in the calibration process. The discharging portion of
the Taylor is a resistive load with a concurrent clock. Even if the
resistor is precise, the calibration presumes a known and constant
voltage --- neither is true. The only thing of precision here is the
clock rate, but the clock setting and reading are not at all precise.
I have modified my leads considerably, and I have often monitored
the voltages and currents.
|
126.109 | loading and measuring nicads under test | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Mon May 08 1989 22:10 | 35 |
| re: a couple back
I have built a bunch of "calibrated" packs of resistors to load
nicad packs, and to cycle them before I got my Taylor. They are
labeled for several different pack voltages and current drains.
All the answers are from Ohms Law. R=V/A; so for a TX pack 10v /
.5a = 20ohms. W=V*A so the 20 ohm resistor should be 10 * .5 or at
least 5 watt rating. I happened to have some big 40ohm resistors
lying around. Two of these in series are about right for a TX
pack, 4 of them for the RX.
Putting N resistors in series multiplies the resistance by N.
Putting N resistors in parallel divides the resistance by N AND
multiplies the wattage by N. Remember that these resistors will
get VERY HOT when discharging batteries for any length of time.
Burnt fingers can result, and if the resistor is not of sufficient
wattage, fires can follow!
As to monitoring the charge/discharge voltage with a DMM, it
shouldn't have much affect on the Taylor operation. I set up my
cycler with Deans connectors, and then short adapters to go from
the deans connectors to each connector type I use on various
equipment. It would be easy to build a harness that is Deans to
Deans, with a + and - tap for the DMM.
Similarly, if you want to monitor (dis)charge current, make a
similar Deans to Deans cable, and cut the + wire. Use the ammeter
as the bridge across this cut to monitor current. I haven't done
this yet for the cycler, but have an aileron extension cable that
I've used to measure servo load / no load current drain. CAUTION!
make sure your ammeter can handle the range you are measuring.
Many quit at 200ma, which is less than most (dis)charge levels.
I've blown several DMM fuses by screwing up. Fortunately fuses are
cheaper than DMMs.
|
126.111 | 3 wire Rx cable? | PLATA::OSWALD | | Tue May 09 1989 15:26 | 12 |
| A question on wiring the Taylor cycler to a Futaba radio:
I have cabled the cycler for my Airtronics radio. It was a piece
of cake and works quite well. I am going to wire up a set of cables
for a friends Futaba, and I noticed that the Rx charger cord is
3 wire! What goes on here? I will put a meter on it to find out
whats going on on each wire, but could someone kindly explain why
a 3 wire charge cable when, as I understand electricity, 2 are quite
sufficient?
Thanks,
Randy
|
126.112 | I just use 2 of the three | CURIE::ANKER | Anker Berg-Sonne | Tue May 09 1989 16:46 | 10 |
| Re:< Note 126.111 by PLATA::OSWALD >
Randy,
I used a voltmeter to determine which of the three wires
were + and - and then put a Deans connector on the two and left
the third cut. The Taylor cycler works like a charm on this. I
don't think the third wire has any function.
Anker
|
126.113 | futaba=airtronics? | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Go B's!! | Tue May 09 1989 19:18 | 13 |
| Yes, use a voltmeter. However, if I remember correctly, there is
"some" compatibility between airtronics and futaba. I have used
futaba charge cords to charge airtronics gear. The fit is not what
I would call trusted, but it did the job. Maybe you don't have
to change the connectors at all, or maybe futaba connectors will
be sufficient for both of you.
DISCLAIMER: Like the instructions say, make sure that the polarity
is correct, or you may damage the cycler.
cheers,
jeff
|
126.114 | Thanks | PLATA::OSWALD | | Tue May 09 1989 19:35 | 12 |
| Plugs aren't a problem, I spliced the Airtronics cords to the cycler
with Dean's connectors so I could support multiple plug styles.
I also put Deans connectors on the remnants of the Airtronics charger
so that I can put the charge plugs back on it if necessary.
I was just concerned about the Futaba three wire system, but now
that I think about it I suspect that they just used a standard three
wire servo cord and plug rather than tool up for the two wire plug.
I'll put a meter on it and wire up the appropriate two wires. Thanks
for the info.
Randy
|
126.115 | It does, actually, make sense ! | LEDS::COHEN | | Wed May 10 1989 01:18 | 4 |
|
The Red wire is +
The Black wire is -
The White wire is <NULL>
|
126.119 | LITCO Cyclers (again...) | ROCK::MINER | Electric = No more glow-glop | Mon May 15 1989 20:51 | 14 |
| RE: < Note 126.117 by CSC32::M_ANTRY >
Please read notes 126.9 and 126.14.
_____
| \
| \ Silent POWER!
_ ___________ _________ | Happy Landings!
| \ | | | | |
|--------|- SANYO + ]-| ASTRO |--| - Dan Miner
|_/ |___________| |_________| |
| / | " The Earth needs more OZONE,
| / not Caster Oil!! "
|_____/
|
126.120 | More LITCO comments please! | CSC32::M_ANTRY | | Tue May 16 1989 17:13 | 20 |
| For all you LITCO fans I would like to have your expound on a couple
of points that they mention in the adds:
- Pulse operation with charge tapering to trickle after full charge
Questions: Isn't Pulsed faster charging? or does it still take
12-14hrs? Does it switch to trickle so that you can
leave it on indefinetly?
- Fully protected against shorts and reversed polarity (unlike other
units)
Questions: Really?????? Doesn't the Talyor or Digipace do this?
- Determines battery capacity or remaning flight time
Questions: What does it spit out on the display and what does it
mean?
- Why pay much more for a far lesser unit?
Questions: I dont know should I?
Thanks.....I think I am just about ready!!!!
|
126.121 | never fully drain a nicad! | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Tue May 30 1989 23:35 | 33 |
| re: 126.81 (still in catch-up mode)
The guy from S&R is right about storing nicads. The best way to
store nicads is "fully discharged". If you don't know the
condition of the pack, the only safe way to do this is as
described, by discharging each cell. Discharging the whole pack
could cause a weak cell to go into reversal, permanently
destroying the pack.
I differ, however, in your definition of "full discharge". A nicad
should NEVER be brought down to 0.00 volts. A cell is considered
"fully discharged" when it reaches the knee of the discharge
curve, around 1.0-1.1 volts. This is the point that most battery
cyclers will take you down to. It may be the point where the
flashlight bulb stops glowing; I'd need to try this with a DVM in
the circuit to tell for sure. As any rate, do NOT leave the light
bulb or other load connected for prolonged periods.
My recommendation for storing nicads (that are known to be in good
shape; packs with no weak cell) for long periods (e.g. over the
winter) would be to use your cycler to run them down, but not
charge them back up until you are ready to use them. When the
flying season starts, then get out your cycler, and charge them up
and cycle them once or twice to be sure that they are still OK.
All of this information combines in my mind to tell me NOT to
trickle charge nicads. This would seem to be the best source of
the nicad memory problems that we're trying to prevent.
Save the trickle charging for your gell cell. They like exactly
the opposite treatment of the nicads. ALWAYS store them fully
charged. Cycling is not necessary for their health; but can be
used to measure their capacity.
|
126.122 | Taylor mods again? | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Tue May 30 1989 23:48 | 18 |
| Re: .94
The resistor I was refering to IS the resistor (at least I assume
that there is a resistor that does this) that sets the discharge
threshold. I'm not sure if I'd have to change the discharge
resistor to maintain calibration or not.
Anyone know how to make the change(s)???
Re: somewhere else
The white wire to the battery pack may be a vestigal feature. I
remember a long time back that some battery packs were center
tapped, so that in addition to the 4.8V you could also get +/-
2.4V. I think some old recievers needed this configuration. The
servos were 4-wire on these systems. My old Kraft gear had the 4
wire cables and connectors, but as was mentioned the white wire
was not connected. Charge them from the black & red wires only.
|
126.123 | I've been reading-up | LEDS::COHEN | | Wed May 31 1989 21:12 | 52 |
| > condition of the pack, the only safe way to do this is as
> described, by discharging each cell. Discharging the whole pack
> could cause a weak cell to go into reversal, permanently
> destroying the pack.
>
> I differ, however, in your definition of "full discharge". A nicad
> should NEVER be brought down to 0.00 volts. A cell is considered
> "fully discharged" when it reaches the knee of the discharge
> curve, around 1.0-1.1 volts. This is the point that most battery
Actually, a low rate discharge over a long period of time works quite
well. Vented NiCads can survive extended periods of reverse voltage
without damage. I use a C/10 discharge rate with a resistor to
discharge my packs as a unit (these are 7.2 and 8.4 volt batteries for
my electric planes). Usually, I'll allow an overnight discharge, which
often leaves the cells at or near 0 volts, followed by a high rate
charge. Cell charge acceptance is better at high charge rates (2C or
greater) than it is at low charge rates (C/10) or less.
> All of this information combines in my mind to tell me NOT to
> trickle charge nicads. This would seem to be the best source of
> the nicad memory problems that we're trying to prevent.
NiCads develop memory as a function of their charge/discharge cycle.
Lots of full charges after partial discharges will leave you with a pack
that behaves as if it's capacity matched the average amount of discharge
you give them. Trickle charging does not contribute to NiCad memory.
Trickle charging will not, however, erase a cell with memory. The only,
and best, way to do that is to deep cycle the cell a few times.
Discharge it at a low rate and then recharge it at a low rate.
NiCads can be left on a C/10 rate INDEFINATELY without damage, below
C/50 they don't charge. Technically you are overcharging the pack at
C/10, but every modern cell is designed to survive this condition
without damage. Higher charge rates cause the generation of heat and gas
pressure within the cell (the two are related to each other, but not
directly. The cell can reach a stabilized temeperature under
overcharge, and continue to increase internal pressure as a result of
the production of Oxygen and Hydrogen) that can cause damage (cell
venting, or damage to the internal structure of the cell).
Interestingly, a NiCad will charge to a higher voltage level, and supply
a greater capacity if charged at a rate over 2C. Many electric car and
plane enthusiasts are actually charging as high as 10C (with *VERY*
accurate peak detection cutoff). I've read of, but have yet to see for
my self, that typical 1200MAH packs supply as much as 25% greater
capacity if charged at these high rates. The key is the detection of
the completion of the charge. You can charge any cell at almost any
rate you'de like, so long as you stop it when the cell is up to
capacity.
|
126.124 | different handling for different usage | LEDS::HUGHES | Dave Hughes (LEDS::HUGHES) NKS1-1/E3 291-7214 | Wed May 31 1989 21:54 | 27 |
|
It seems that there are different recommendations on charging depending
on the use of the the batteries. I'm confused about which are valid for
which use.
We have two drastically different ways in which we use NiCads in R/C: As
power for radio transmitters/receivers, and as power for drive motors.
The requirements are quite different.
Radio batteries typically drain at low rates, (C/2 or less is typical).
The requirement for these batteries is to supply reliable power for the
rated capacity (measured in hours), and the results of a failure could
be catastrophic (crashed plane or worse).
Motor power batteries typically drain at a very high rate (10C or more)
and the goal is to get the most juice you can for as long as you can
(measured in minutes or seconds). The results of failure is usually not
catastrophic (shorter flight).
When I see advice given about the care and handling of NiCads it's
sometimes not clear which category of operation is implied behind the
advice. It's possible that the cell design is different for different
types of usage. I would be much more wary of damaging radio batteries
than power batteries. What are the major differences in battery handling
between these two types of use?
Dave
|
126.125 | what have you read that I missed? | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Wed May 31 1989 21:59 | 10 |
| I'd be curious as to your reference material. Anyone have a good
reference on nicads. Everything I've ever read says that total
discharge to 0.00V can be harmful to the nicad cell. I've
certainly trashed plenty of cells that way. Even the tricks to fix
them only work for a short time, and then it's time to replace the
cell.
I have heard that the very high charge rates can pack more charge
into a cell. It almost seems like cheating for racing and the
like.
|
126.126 | Comments on Nicad Maintenance | CLOSUS::TAVARES | John -- Stay low, keep moving | Thu Jun 01 1989 14:41 | 45 |
| One of the great things about wrecking planes in one or two
flights is that you get to learn neat things about the care and
feeding of nicads.
My charger has three rates, C/10 or 50 mA, C/25 or 20 mA, and
C/100 or 5 mA. I can also test the batteries under a 250 mA
simulated load, or I can cycle them down to the 1.1 V/cell level
at the same rate. This is all you need to maintain radio
batteries.
I use the C/10 rate only after fully cycling the batteries, which
I do every 8 weeks or so. Or if the batteries have been
discharged for some accidental reason, like leaving them plugged
into the charger with the charger turned off, a recent "gotcha".
My normal routine is to check the batteries early in the week
with the test button. If the batteries have fallen to their
rated charge level, 4.8 or 9.6, I give them a 20 mA charge. If
the batteries are still above that level, as they will be for the
first 15 or so minutes of operation after a full charge they get
the 5 mA charge.
Now, the reason for all this elaborate detail is to show that
both the 20 mA AND 5 mA rates are effective. If the battery is
nearly fully charged, that is above its rated voltage, a 5 mA
charge overnight will bring it to the fully charged condiditon;
the voltage in the cell does go up to 1.31 nominal volts. The
same holds for the 20 mA rate.
I know that conventional wisdom says I'm asking for memory
problems, but I have not seen them. I've read that the cells
manufactured in the last 5 years or so (and you are asking for
trouble by using older cells for your radio) have no significant
memory problem, and I believe this. The trick is in regular
cycling.
As a side note, I run the batteries in my walkman radio down flat
at least once a week and recharge them. I've been doing this
steadily for the last 3 years, and they are disgustedly healthy.
I've also stored packs in fully charged and discharged
conditions, though I prefer to store fully charged and to
recharge them at C/10 once in a while (when I think of it) with
no bad effects. When stored fully discharged I have to cycle the
pack 2 or so times to get it really solid, but I've not seen any
real loss in performance.
|
126.127 | Is too much cycling bad? | BRNIN::SOUTIERE | | Thu Jun 01 1989 15:31 | 8 |
|
I listen to all this info on different charge rates, but I have
a Taylor cycler and all I do is after a few hours of actual flying
time I cycle the packs. Is this okay? I figured cycling was better
than guessing at the charge rate and hooking up to the charger for
15 hours. I don't have any measuring equipment.
Ken
|
126.128 | a few answers | LEDS::COHEN | | Thu Jun 01 1989 15:32 | 53 |
| There are two types of NiCad Cells. Sealed and Vented. Both provide
the same function, but have differing charge/discharge characteristics.
Almost all NiCads in radio gear, like the Cells used for motor power,
are vented cells. Vented cells can withstand significant overcharge,
and high duty cycle use, much better than sealed cells. Sealed cells
relly only get used nowadays for applications where the environment
prohibits the use of vented cells (Very high pressure, or low pressure.
sealed environments where the venting of explosive gases would be
dangerous). Regardless of the capacity of the cell, if it's vented, you
can treat it the same as for any other capacity. Smaller cells actually
survive mistreatment better than larger capacity cells, since they
typically have a larger ratio of surface area to cell capacity, and that
determines how much heat the cell will generate, and how well it will
dissipate.
The only reason you don't see a lot of fast charging of radio batteries
is that, usually, there's no need to do so, you get as much flying from
a single overnight charge as you want (there are Fast Field Chargers for
radio batteries, though, they can be fast charged quite successfully at
high rates). The "Fast-Charge" cells that get sold for motor power
differ from slower rate cells only in their ability to deal with an
overcharge condition. Fast charge cells withstand the stresses better
than slow charge cells. The key here is that if you can accurately
detect the end of the charge cycle, and remove the cell from the high
charge rate BEFORE it's in overcharge, you can fast charge ANY NiCad.
The batteries that I use for my motor systems get a deep cycle everytime
they run. After a flight is over, I'll let the motor run until the
batteries barely have enough juice to turn the prop, then I'll let the
pack cool off for a few minutes and recharge it at 4C. They handle this
kind of usage cycle quite well. I've yet to notice any degradation.
Electrics can't really fly if the power system isn't up to snuff. I've
had a few packs (cheap ones, bought at discount) that couldn't fly my
planes at all. The packs that do fly the planes have been doing so for
two seasons now without any noticable loss.
Quoting from the GE NiCad Applications guide :
Single cell batteries can be completely discharged at will.
To the extent feasible, it is recommended that steps be taken
to limit the frequency of very deep discharge in multicell
batteries using SEALED CELLS. Because of the slight
differences in capacity between cells, one or more cells will
run out of charge capacity before the other cells in a
multicell battery reach zero voltage, causeing reverse
charging of the lowest capacity cells.
...
Vented cells can tolerate significant periods of reverse
potential without damage or permanent performance
degradation.
|
126.129 | My Experience = Randy's | LEDS::WATT | | Fri Jun 09 1989 13:13 | 10 |
| My experience agrees with Randy's. It is ok do FULLY discharge a cell
but don't do it to a pack unless you know it's balanced. Reversal does
damage a cell and that will happen if one cell fully discharges before
the others. That's why all literature says to stop discharge at 1.1
volts per cell to prevent the weaker ones from going into reversal.
I have gone into packs and discharged individual cells to zero by
connecting a resistor to each cell and leaving it on for an hour.
Charlie
|
126.130 | Highly unscientific test results | SNOC02::BROWNTONY | Tony Brown @ SNO: Sydney, Australia | Tue Jun 13 1989 05:54 | 20 |
| Does anyone have any information on the life of a nicad as a function
of age as well as the number of charge/discharge cycles? For what
it's worth, I have a Philips razor which is powered by a pair of
C sized nicads. My procedure is to use the razor until the red light
tells me to recharge, and then charge for 24 hours. I would assume
that this mehtod approaches the ideal cycling technique for maximum
life. I bought the razor almost exactly four years ago and the battery
capacity has just started to drop dramatically; from about 21 days'
use to about 6. According to my calculations, I have put the batteries
through about 70 cycles. This does not compare favourably with my
belief that nicads should cope with 500 to 1000 cycles before
degrading!
My Tx is just on three years old: maybe it's time to start checking
the capacity very, very carefully!
Comments?
Tony
|
126.131 | NICAD Testing, Revisited | CLOSUS::TAVARES | John -- Stay low, keep moving | Tue Jun 13 1989 14:17 | 36 |
| It looks like you're treating those razor nicads ok. I'd think
that maybe the type of use, that is running a small motor at
lets say 1 amp, has something to do with it.
Tx batteries run at about 180 mA, so there's quite a difference
here. The difference is that the razor batteries generate
significant heat at their discharge rate, whereas the Tx
batteries don't.
However, I think that in general a good rule is to chuck a set of
batteries after 4 years or so...
I have three sets of AAA nicads that I use on my "boogie radio"
at work. These batteries gave about 10-12 hours on the radio
when new. Friday I had an all-night radio session and ran them
down in about 5 hours -- went through two sets! Its my practice
to run the batteries until they're flat and then recharge. I've
been doing this for about 4 years now. These batteries are ready
for the graveyard; since the use is not critical, I'll take my
time replacing them.
I think that the only way to measure a battery's capacity, or
rather condition, it to to a timed cycle. Put the battery on a
Standard Load of C/2, or 250 mA in the case of our radio
batteries, and time the discharge. Let me emphasize the standard
load: any other test condition is pure bunk.
If you were a real Boy Scout, you 'd have done this when the
batteries were new, and you would have plotted a discharge curve
for them. Then you could check the batteries periodically
against this curve for condidition.
But of course, we're all sloths, not scouts, so we just say that
if we get 1 1/2 to 2 hours on the test the battery has not
depreciated significantly. I would consider 1 to 1.25 hours a
flunking score.
|
126.133 | two repairs for the price of one | ABACUS::RYDER | perpetually the bewildered beginner | Thu Aug 10 1989 10:25 | 12 |
| I'll look at it, Jeff. I have to fix mine anyway.
My Taylor has had an electrical, not mechanical, failure. It is
probably my fault for misusing it, but I'll describe it here in case
the symptoms are not unique to mine. The problem is in the TX side.
The other day I finished repairing the Kadet and put my radio on the
Taylor to cycle. The receiver side cycled OK, showing a residual
charge of 500 mAh on a 600 pack. The transmitter stopped discharging
at 360 mAh with a blown fuse. This happened during the night, so I
don't know if the fuse went at the time of switch-over or before/after
that time. I suspect the switch-over sequence might have a problem.
|
126.134 | Help! Taylor on the fritz... | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Mon Apr 29 1991 21:52 | 16 |
| My Taylor cycler broke this weekend. I was cycling a 6v (5 cell)
AA pack on the RX side (calibrated for a 4.8v pack, but I've been
doing this for as long as I've had the beast; I'm only concerned
with a change in capacity, not the actual number), and it stopped
at about 100mah. After verifying that the pack was fully charged,
I tried again. Immediately after pushing the red button, the
cycler dropped off discharge and started charging. I've since
tried it with several packs, from 4.8v to 10v, and all drop off
the discharge cycle immediately.
The TX side seems to be working fine. I opened up the unit, and
saw no visible evidence of fried components. Anyone got an idea on
what might be wrong? Therre are no fuses or any obvious things to
check inside the box. Is it a DIY fix? If not, anyone got an
address and phone # for Taylor (or a pointer to the right note).
Are schematics available?
|
126.138 | address below out-of-date; see 126.150 for L.R. Taylor's new address | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Tue Apr 30 1991 21:28 | 19 |
| I'd welcome a copy of the (either/both) schematics. My mailstop is
ACI.
I found the note with Taylor's address and phone number. They have
since moved down the street, and changed phone numbers. The new
information is:
L.R. Taylor
22122 Roscoe Blvd
Canogha Park, CA 91304
818-704-8950
The gentleman I spoke to there said that my problem is probably
the Red LED that died. He said that it needs to be recalibrated
after a LED replacement, as the LED is part of the measuring
circuit. Perhaps this weekend, I'll take a stab at it myself. If
all else fails, I'll send it back to them. He said that repairs
would probably be $22, including return postage, and take a week.
Jeff, does that match with your experiences?
|
126.139 | Should be easy to re-calibrate | HPSPWR::WALTER | | Wed May 01 1991 01:37 | 18 |
| I can send you a copy of my schematic, but if it really is the LED, you
probably don't need the schematic. After replacing the LED, use an
adjustable power supply to place a voltage on the battery test
terminals. As you lower the power supply voltage, the circuit should
transition from discharge to charge at 4.4V for the receiver, 8.8V for
the transmitter. There are two 100 ohm pots used to calibrate the
transition voltage, one each for the two circuits. Near as I can tell,
that's all you need to do.
Mind you, I think it's a pretty lousy design. It relies on using the
diode and the base-emitter junction of a transistor as a "reference",
and that not only varies from device to device, it varies quite a bit
with temperature. That's why they suggest you wait for the box to cool
down before testing another battery. On the other hand, the results are
pretty consistent, and there's no doubt it's cheap to manufacture.
Dave
|
126.140 | Taylor schematics available here | ABACUS::RYDER | perpetually the bewildered beginner | Wed May 01 1991 09:20 | 12 |
| I have a copy of the official [four page] prints together with
annotations that I made when I worked on the circuit a couple of years
ago. (Reality did not agree with the prints.) Send me mail via
>Notes SEND/AUTHOR with your mailstop, and I'll send out copies.
I'll first send a copy to Dave Walter for his comments.
I abused mine by using it to charge whatever batteries needed service.
Like Dave, I was not impressed by the circuit; someday I'll replace
the guts with a decent circuit. Until then it mostly gathers dust.
Alton
|
126.141 | Garbage | LEDS::WATT | | Wed May 01 1991 11:19 | 18 |
| Led's have TERRIBLE voltage vs temperature characteristics. A circuit
like Dave described is just plain awful. I'm glad I built my own. I
was disappointed when I had a 2% drift in my reference as my circuits
warmed up. :-) I used a plain old zener diode for a reference but I
just bought a temperature compensated reference diode to upgrade it. I
use an old PC for the data collection and display so there is an A/D
converter in my cycler that also needs a 10V reference.
By the way, I have schematics for the DIGIPACE cycler and it is a
good design. It is not as flexible as mine because the stop voltage is
not programmable. Mine will work with from 1 to eight cells and
discharge from 10ma to 10 amps! I can cycle the packs for my electrics
at high currents. The measured capacity of Nicads varies greatly with
the discharge rate. I think that most cells are measured at C/2 when
they are rated. I usually only get about 80% capacity if I discharge
at the C rate. (which I usually do to save time)
Charlie
|
126.142 | I want one! (Hell, I want several!) | ZENDIA::REITH | Jim Reith DTN 226-6102 - LTN2-1/F02 | Wed May 01 1991 12:04 | 6 |
| Ok, Charlie. Where/when can we get a schematic, parts list, and PC
board mask? I'd love to do better than my RAM simple cycler. One feature
that I'd like to see would be an interface to a clock chip so that it
stores/displays the discharge time for unattended operation (without
loss of the discharge info. I want to build several of these since
cycling everything one at a time is getting to be a pain.
|
126.143 | Litco Systems has a nice unit | RGB::MINER | Dan Miner, DTN:225-4015, HLO2-1/J12 (@ H11) | Wed May 01 1991 13:10 | 4 |
| Jim, Litco Systems makes a nice LCD unit that I have. See note
126.9 for more details.
- Dan Miner
|
126.144 | Location of Power Pacer schematics | HPSPWR::WALTER | | Wed May 01 1991 16:47 | 12 |
| Getting back to the original broken Power Pacer... I have schematics
available in postscript format. You can copy them from:
PWRVAX::STEALTH:[WALTER.PUBLIC]POWER_PACER_1.PS
PWRVAX::STEALTH:[WALTER.PUBLIC]POWER_PACER_2.PS
Page 1 is the receiver circuit, page 2 the transmitter circuit.
I don't know how these compare to the "published" prints; I just
sketched it out from the circuit board.
Dave
|
126.145 | L.R. Taylor upgrades? | KAY::FISHER | Stop and smell the balsa. | Wed May 01 1991 18:35 | 16 |
| Since a gaggle of us did a group purchase of these L.R. Taylor units
and since they seem to work fine although slightly limited. Perhaps
Charley you wouldn't mind taking a look at the schematic and coming
up with some simple upgrade mods.
For instance - I was at one time real interested in ordering the ACE
auto trickle unit for their Digipace - hoping that somehow it could
be connected to the L.R. Taylor. I gave up - but I sure wish I could
kick over to trickle after a full charge has been attained.
Now ACE has a new Digipace II that looks interesting.
Bye --+--
Kay R. Fisher |
---------------O---------------
################################################################################
|
126.146 | a Taylor upgrade would be appreciated | ABACUS::RYDER | perpetually the bewildered beginner | Thu May 02 1991 10:12 | 10 |
| >> L.R. Taylor ..... simple upgrade mods.
I have the same interest --- and will probably never get around to
designing what I'd like.
Many of us with a Taylor do not have a PC, let alone an interface.
But the Taylor mechanics include a pair of timers [with old fashioned
displays that work]. I wouldn't mind turning a multi-position switch
to input the number of cells, another to select the discharge rate, and
a third to select the charge rate.
|
126.147 | I'm working on Ultra Cycler | LEDS::WATT | | Thu May 02 1991 11:09 | 14 |
| I'll look at the schematics but I probably won't have time to do much
with it until after the flying season. :-) I have most of the design
done on a very nice cycler/charger that will do from 1 to 8 cells both
fast charge and cycle discharge. It will be able to work at the field
off of a 12V car battery and it will download cycle data to a PC via
RS232. I have lost interest in electrics so I've been slow to finish
this. Bill Lewis, the co-designer has also been too busy to work on
it. I really did want to get it done this spring, though. My old PC
version works fine but it ain't too portable and it ties up the PC
during the cycling. I don't have schematics on line but I'll try to
bring them to the next DECRCM meeting if I can make it myself.
Charlie
|
126.148 | Red LED it was - now works fine! | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Mon May 06 1991 14:40 | 31 |
| Whomever I spoke to at Taylor was quite correct; I replaced the
red LED this weekend (it's orange now, but so what), and the unit
now works fine.
Couldn't I calibrate it if necessary just by monitoring the
battery voltage as it switches over from discharge to charge, and
see where it cuts out. I tried this on the TX side before fixing
the RX side. I was building something with an 8 cell pack
permanently installed and hard wired. I felt safer working with a
discharged pack, so I connected it up, but did not plug the cycler
into the AC. Pressing the test button discharged the pack, but
gave no readout on MaH.
The pack will recover a bit, but now you have a quick test
available. I connected up my DMM leads, and pressed test again.
Very quickly the pack dropped from about 9.2v down to 8.4v when
the discharge cycle stopped. After waiting a few minutes, I tried
again, and again the voltage dropped from 9.2 to 8.4, this time
even faster.
This leads me to believe that my unit might be slightly off
calibration, but only by about 5% or so, which is close enough for
my needs. Unless someone can suggest a better way, I'll use this
to test and recalibrate if necessary the RX side.
I did make another discovery inside the cycler. The only thing
that holds the circuit board in place inside the unit is the
tension on the two wires that you connect up to your battery
packs! I didn't think much of this, so after I fixed the board, I
used a few dabs of hot melt glue to hold the board in place, and
released the stress on the two test wires.
|
126.150 | L.R. Taylor's new address | ABACUS::RYDER | perpetually the bewildered beginner | Sun Feb 09 1992 10:08 | 5 |
| According to page 4 of the March 1992 RCM, Taylor has moved again.
L.R. Taylor & Co. 818/997-6845
15624 Vanowen Street
Van Nuys, CA 91406
|