Username | Total Posts | First Post | Last Post | Most Used Personal Name |
---|---|---|---|---|
19586::DAVIDSON | 1 | Fri May 26 1989 | Fri May 26 1989 | VMS development |
Conference | Total Posts | Conference Title |
---|---|---|
vmszoo::rms_openvms | 90 | RMS asks, 'R U Journaled?' |
nac::dap | 9 | DAP Architecture and Implementation Issues |
TOPIC | 149.0 | $CLOSE a sequential file returns EOF | ||
149.4 | Fri Apr 21 1989 23:58 | Do you have a trace? | 9 lines | |
TOPIC | 237.0 | Key compression? | ||
237.3 | Fri Apr 14 1989 02:14 | no definitive answers | 9 lines | |
TOPIC | 577.0 | can't get to documentation | ||
577.8 | Sun Apr 09 1989 14:36 | 5 lines | ||
TOPIC | 612.0 | Blocking AST worth the effort with SHARED? | ||
612.6 | Thu Mar 30 1989 13:07 | There are locks, and then there are locks.... | 11 lines | |
TOPIC | 869.0 | %RMS-..., error in node name" | ||
869.3 | Fri Jan 20 1989 10:46 | agreed, it's a bug | 8 lines | |
869.5 | Mon Jan 23 1989 14:42 | QAR if you like, we (now) know of the problem | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 874.0 | Tape blocksize on 5.0 | ||
874.2 | Sat Mar 25 1989 18:19 | .0 is fixed -- in a future release | 10 lines | |
TOPIC | 881.0 | RMS$_BUG_DAP - Help !!! | ||
881.4 | Wed Feb 15 1989 01:23 | fixed in 5.1 | 16 lines | |
TOPIC | 889.0 | Any info on VMS 5.0 Bug? | ||
889.2 | Wed Jan 18 1989 01:44 | Did 5.0-1 patches get applied? | 12 lines | |
TOPIC | 891.0 | Performance of Shared Seq. Files | ||
891.2 | Mon Jan 23 1989 11:16 | DFW is needed | 8 lines | |
TOPIC | 893.0 | EOF in clusters... | ||
893.4 | Mon Jan 23 1989 14:26 | Sample program -- please | 15 lines | |
893.8 | Tue May 02 1989 02:25 | any more circumstantial nifo? | 7 lines | |
TOPIC | 900.0 | Isn't RELATIVE best for access by record number? | ||
900.2 | Sun Jan 29 1989 20:49 | Caching is identical -- when shared | 17 lines | |
900.7 | Thu Feb 02 1989 02:31 | Some ideas | 68 lines | |
TOPIC | 918.0 | my copy-progr. changes file contens | ||
918.2 | Wed Feb 15 1989 02:07 | No good choice... | 15 lines | |
TOPIC | 919.0 | Muliblock vs Multibuffer? | ||
919.1 | Wed Feb 15 1989 02:15 | How big vs how many | 13 lines | |
TOPIC | 920.0 | RMS extensions | ||
920.1 | Fri Feb 17 1989 20:56 | Thoughts.....yup (any discussion is speculative) | 9 lines | |
TOPIC | 929.0 | $SEARCH and RMS$_IFI error | ||
929.3 | Tue Feb 21 1989 23:07 | Check FOP | 5 lines | |
929.6 | Fri May 19 1989 21:54 | re .4 | 8 lines | |
TOPIC | 945.0 | Extent vs. cluster | ||
945.1 | Tue Feb 28 1989 23:15 | more info req'd | 8 lines | |
TOPIC | 946.0 | Indexed "get previous" in RMS? | ||
946.1 | Tue Feb 28 1989 23:18 | product management issue | 5 lines | |
TOPIC | 950.0 | ACCESSING A REMOTE INDEX FILE | ||
950.2 | Tue Mar 07 1989 09:52 | example please | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 951.0 | Program hang in RMSWAIT_IO_DONE | ||
951.1 | Tue Mar 07 1989 11:20 | Check the FAB | 9 lines | |
TOPIC | 959.0 | dispute concerning $FLUSH | ||
959.3 | Thu Mar 16 1989 15:42 | Possible rewording | 12 lines | |
TOPIC | 964.0 | Alternate Key Bucket Locked? | ||
964.1 | Tue Mar 14 1989 01:59 | Try SDA to track locks | 10 lines | |
TOPIC | 967.0 | FIRST READ FROM $DECK IS INVALID? | ||
967.1 | Tue Mar 14 1989 02:30 | Use RAB$W_RSZ | 7 lines | |
TOPIC | 970.0 | analyze/rms failed on access violation in v5.0-2 | ||
970.2 | Tue May 09 1989 00:28 | Need to look at a file | 8 lines | |
TOPIC | 971.0 | XABITMs and VMS versions | ||
971.1 | Wed Mar 15 1989 20:05 | You have identified a problem. | 11 lines | |
971.5 | Tue Mar 21 1989 11:04 | Get a DAP trace | 8 lines | |
971.7 | Tue Mar 28 1989 11:46 | Flaky connection? | 7 lines | |
TOPIC | 972.0 | open indexed files shared | ||
972.3 | Mon Mar 20 1989 14:59 | The problem is now COPY | 8 lines | |
TOPIC | 973.0 | Confusing PORT | ||
973.4 | Thu Mar 16 1989 16:03 | Check for both (either?) | 8 lines | |
TOPIC | 975.0 | Open a file for EXECUTE access? | ||
975.1 | Mon Mar 20 1989 14:51 | This is access mode protected | 10 lines | |
TOPIC | 986.0 | ACP fiel extend failed message | ||
986.1 | Fri Mar 31 1989 11:34 | Ask NOTES folks how to find out what happened! | 5 lines | |
TOPIC | 994.0 | RMS Journaling Failure | ||
994.1 | Tue Apr 11 1989 02:54 | 0's for deleted records | 10 lines | |
994.3 | Thu Apr 13 1989 03:13 | 7 lines | ||
TOPIC | 995.0 | Can PC read file with RUJ | ||
995.1 | Thu Apr 13 1989 03:08 | Yes and No | 5 lines | |
TOPIC | 997.0 | Appending Record Access Files | ||
997.3 | Thu Apr 13 1989 03:18 | APPEND should work | 8 lines | |
TOPIC | 999.0 | Internal details needed. | ||
999.2 | Fri Apr 14 1989 01:54 | Right! | 5 lines | |
TOPIC | 1000.0 | RMS-S-xxx and RMS-W-xxx | ||
1000.4 | Fri Apr 14 1989 02:00 | Poke aroud with SDA.. | 7 lines | |
TOPIC | 1004.0 | RMS services from EXEC mode ? | ||
1004.1 | Mon Apr 17 1989 12:05 | Some thoughts | 17 lines | |
1004.3 | Tue Apr 18 1989 01:30 | RMS$_BUSY, not bugcheck | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 1006.0 | RU recovery takes long time | ||
1006.6 | Fri Apr 28 1989 14:48 | Improvements have and will be made. | 10 lines | |
TOPIC | 1008.0 | disabling deferred write | ||
1008.3 | Wed Apr 19 1989 19:33 | What is the real problem? | 18 lines | |
1008.5 | Thu Apr 20 1989 00:40 | Why not just use shared sequential? | 14 lines | |
TOPIC | 1009.0 | ACP File Create Fail message | ||
1009.1 | Wed Apr 19 1989 19:38 | Not fair -- what is the rest of the completion status? | 4 lines | |
1009.3 | Sat Apr 22 1989 00:05 | Byte count quota | 7 lines | |
TOPIC | 1010.0 | ANSI Std. Interchange Tape | ||
1010.1 | Thu Apr 20 1989 00:49 | How 'bout foreign tapes? | 12 lines | |
TOPIC | 1013.0 | submit/remote question | ||
1013.2 | Fri Apr 28 1989 14:55 | No plans to drop support | 10 lines | |
TOPIC | 1017.0 | Error In Which Device Name ? | ||
1017.1 | Tue May 02 1989 01:34 | should be your process default device | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 1018.0 | RMS file type UDF questions | ||
1018.1 | Tue May 02 1989 02:03 | some thoughts | 18 lines | |
TOPIC | 1021.0 | $PARSE doesn't work like through DCL | ||
1021.2 | Tue May 02 1989 02:14 | a bit more?... | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 1025.0 | VFC INTERNALS ... Help please | ||
1025.1 | Wed May 03 1989 00:12 | 61 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1026.0 | SPR for Journaling | ||
1026.3 | Thu May 04 1989 00:19 | Confusion? | 10 lines | |
TOPIC | 1028.0 | How to get all versions from $search ? | ||
1028.1 | Sat May 06 1989 01:45 | 2 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1030.0 | RMS calling sequence for user ASTs? | ||
1030.1 | Wed May 10 1989 02:41 | RAB or FAB... | 10 lines | |
TOPIC | 1041.0 | Seq file benchmark optimisation | ||
1041.5 | Tue Jun 13 1989 14:15 | Why?? | 15 lines | |
TOPIC | 1044.0 | EDF$PLAYBACK_INPUT logical in EDIT/FDL | ||
1044.3 | Fri May 26 1989 19:35 | 5 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1046.0 | RMS$_RSA question | ||
1046.1 | Fri May 26 1989 20:53 | 2 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1047.0 | Edit Journal Files? | ||
1047.4 | Thu Jun 01 1989 13:14 | Not supported...now or in the forseeable future | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 1050.0 | Failure in TRUNCATE_ON_CLOSE after BASIC CLOSE | ||
1050.1 | Thu Jun 01 1989 13:33 | Option examined on $CLOSE | 10 lines | |
1050.3 | Fri Jun 02 1989 11:06 | TEF is not a sticky option | 22 lines | |
TOPIC | 1051.0 | MSE bit and async $PUTs | ||
1051.2 | Thu Jun 01 1989 13:42 | Some answers... | 11 lines | |
TOPIC | 1052.0 | DEQALL bug info? | ||
1052.2 | Thu Jun 01 1989 18:11 | There's smoke, but is there fire? | 11 lines | |
TOPIC | 1053.0 | RMS support for streamfiles... | ||
1053.1 | Mon Jun 05 1989 14:56 | 13 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1054.0 | EOF position in CLUSTER with UPI set | ||
1054.1 | Mon Jun 05 1989 15:01 | $CLOSE makes EOF visable | 7 lines | |
TOPIC | 1055.0 | Storage space for RMS Multibuffers? | ||
1055.1 | Mon Jun 05 1989 15:34 | Process quotas? | 15 lines | |
TOPIC | 1056.0 | Journalling recovery of records in sequentail files | ||
1056.1 | Tue Jun 06 1989 10:31 | Yes - for shared write access to fixed sequential records | 12 lines | |
TOPIC | 1058.0 | How do I truncate an indexed file? | ||
1058.1 | Tue Jun 06 1989 12:43 | 7 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1059.0 | rms journaling without rms journaling | ||
1059.1 | Thu Jun 08 1989 11:27 | RUF services | 12 lines | |
TOPIC | 1061.0 | weird RMS (or what ?) | ||
1061.1 | Tue Jun 13 1989 14:59 | 12 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1071.0 | CONV/FDL version 5.1. HELP | ||
1071.1 | Thu Jun 15 1989 09:40 | A cosmetic difference | 12 lines | |
TOPIC | 1074.0 | Journaling and Extend qualifier | ||
1074.1 | Thu Jun 15 1989 10:05 | code/documentation don't match | 5 lines | |
TOPIC | 1083.0 | A search for rms utility | ||
1083.1 | Wed Jul 05 1989 10:59 | 2 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1098.0 | Record locking and RU Journaling | ||
1098.1 | Mon Jul 10 1989 19:10 | 6 lines | ||
TOPIC | 1111.0 | 2 questions re remote RMS | ||
1111.1 | Wed Jul 19 1989 23:31 | Actually, YES | 10 lines | |
TOPIC | 1125.0 | Journaling and non-journaling nodes in a cluster. | ||
1125.1 | Sat Aug 05 1989 00:11 | Lincense checks are the key | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 1143.0 | File protection and journaling | ||
1143.1 | Mon Sep 04 1989 16:32 | submit a problem report | 9 lines | |
TOPIC | 1144.0 | Asynch $GET and $DELETE disorders | ||
1144.1 | Mon Sep 04 1989 17:13 | experimental error? | 13 lines | |
TOPIC | 1175.0 | NODE::"NAME.EXT" sets NAM$V_EXP_DIR in $PARSE | ||
1175.1 | Wed Sep 20 1989 12:15 | Bad assumption in LSE | 12 lines | |
TOPIC | 1176.0 | RMSJ - active RUs | ||
1176.1 | Wed Sep 20 1989 03:19 | 'cached' journal set-up | 13 lines | |
TOPIC | 1178.0 | RMS call SYS$READ returns RMS$_BUSY. | ||
1178.1 | Wed Sep 20 1989 03:28 | ASY? | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 1197.0 | SQO bit applies to what? | ||
1197.1 | Mon Oct 02 1989 09:33 | Use SQO only when you mean it (but do use it!) | 14 lines | |
TOPIC | 1219.0 | Queries about OPEN/SHARE ? | ||
1219.2 | Tue Oct 24 1989 02:26 | Works with proper options. | 15 lines | |
TOPIC | 1223.0 | Asynchronous Directory Creates? | ||
1223.2 | Tue Oct 24 1989 02:32 | wish list... | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 1230.0 | location of IFAB and IRAB | ||
1230.1 | Mon Nov 13 1989 07:55 | it is normal | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 1235.0 | Open 'access append & allow modfiy' => I/O | ||
1235.2 | Mon Nov 13 1989 08:03 | Try DFW | 5 lines | |
TOPIC | 1239.0 | XABPRO and protection at $CLOSE | ||
1239.6 | Wed Nov 15 1989 22:26 | Fixed in future documentation | 7 lines | |
TOPIC | 1256.0 | Write back a record or whole buffer | ||
1256.1 | Fri Dec 08 1989 12:37 | UPI sharing? | 6 lines | |
TOPIC | 1321.0 | deadlock on shared seq files? | ||
1321.2 | Fri Feb 09 1990 01:29 | Problem reported, not yet understood | 15 lines |
TOPIC | 36.0 | New Date & Time formats | ||
36.10 | Wed Mar 22 1989 13:11 | negotiation! | 19 lines | |
36.13 | Thu Mar 23 1989 23:33 | sorry -- I was thinking about the future | 13 lines | |
36.15 | Mon Mar 27 1989 02:01 | performance? | 11 lines | |
TOPIC | 38.0 | RMS$_BUG_DAP help | ||
38.7 | Wed Feb 15 1989 01:00 | Explaination now possible! | 20 lines | |
TOPIC | 39.0 | Proposal for checksum on all DAP messages | ||
39.2 | Sat Mar 11 1989 13:42 | I concur | 21 lines | |
TOPIC | 40.0 | FAL access under Phase V naming | ||
40.1 | Fri Mar 17 1989 10:44 | A marvelous opportunity | 22 lines | |
40.3 | Tue Mar 21 1989 10:20 | Point solutions vs. architecture | 24 lines | |
TOPIC | 47.0 | CONFIG MSG - SOFTVER | ||
47.1 | Fri Aug 11 1989 18:15 | Still not enough | 9 lines | |
TOPIC | 48.0 | RSTS Native Stream files are not RMS | ||
48.5 | Fri Sep 01 1989 01:03 | What would we do with it? | 7 lines |
First Post: | Wed Jan 18 1989 |
Last Post: | Fri Feb 09 1990 |
# Topics: | 0 |
# Replies: | 99 |
# We have note bodies for: | 0 |