[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Posting history for user FORTY2::GOULD

131 notes across 4 conferences

Known Personal Names (4)

Possible 2 Other Accounts for FORTY2::GOULD

Username Total
Posts
First
Post
Last
Post
Most Used
Personal Name
52668::GOULD_D2Wed Feb 05 1992Wed Feb 05 1992David Gould
CALAF::GOULD1Thu Nov 03 1988Thu Nov 03 1988David Gould

Summary of Posts

Click on conference filespec to scroll down to
ConferenceTotal
Posts
Conference Title
forty2::mailbus_v165MAILBUS conference - Message Router and its gateways
forty2::x400-support-information53X.400 Support Information
abbott::x400mail12DEC MAILworks
rocks::mr-telex-gateway1VAX MR-TELEX

Conference forty2::mailbus_v1 (MAILBUS conference - Message Router and its gateways)

65 posts
TOPIC 528.0 MRX V2 and ORGUNITs
528.3Fri Feb 19 1988 21:01 Must use 4 orgunits ONLY 4 lines
TOPIC 606.0 Questions on MRX v2..
606.1Wed Mar 30 1988 20:28 Answers - both, yes, yes-but-don't 62 lines
TOPIC 607.0 MR V3.0, MRX 2.0 and ALL-IN-1 2.2, MR 2.0??
607.1Wed Mar 30 1988 20:36 Try all @ signs, not :: 11 lines
TOPIC 630.0 Privately Defined Bodypart with MRX
630.5Thu Jun 16 1988 18:20 Raw WPS-PLUS not in 2.0 18 lines
TOPIC 815.0 Problem adding an external_name
815.2Mon Jul 18 1988 17:31 Use up to 16 characters for MRX V2.0 11 lines
TOPIC 850.0 MRX addressing issues
850.10Tue Jan 30 1990 12:44 Who said it was a feature? 61 lines
TOPIC 954.0 X.400/ISO6937/DEC-DG
954.2Fri Oct 21 1988 12:22 MRX V2.1 will send ISO 6937 12 lines
TOPIC 1143.0 Multiple ADMD
1143.3Wed Dec 21 1988 16:55 'BELONG' is to do with the configuration parameter 94 lines
1143.4Wed Dec 21 1988 17:16 Delivery of inbound messages 33 lines
TOPIC 1160.0 Addressing from/to MRX to/from MR Telex??
1160.1Mon Jan 09 1989 12:39 Use the MRX S kit for Telex interworking 56 lines
TOPIC 1186.0 MR/P MR/X Relay
1186.6Wed Jan 25 1989 12:33 The documentation is there for a good reason 23 lines
TOPIC 1196.0 Ordering VOTS S/W for MRX V2.1
1196.1Wed Jan 25 1989 13:52 With MRX you get... 21 lines
1196.2Wed Jan 25 1989 13:53 and if it wasn't all there.... 1 lines
TOPIC 1271.0 ENCODEDTYPES with MRIF & MRX.400
1271.4Fri Mar 03 1989 12:12 Please submit an SPR 18 lines
TOPIC 1276.0 How does MRX handle X400 service elements?
1276.3Fri Mar 03 1989 11:57 Please submit an SPR 20 lines
TOPIC 1278.0 MR/X and binary file transfer
1278.7Wed Sep 06 1989 17:27 WPSPLUS_PASS means just that 6 lines
1278.11Mon Nov 20 1989 11:58 Vanishingly small 6 lines
TOPIC 1301.0 DDS, MTAs, and DOMAINs
1301.4Mon Mar 13 1989 12:58 Inter-domain relay uses domain objects 13 lines
TOPIC 1333.0 MRIF Intra-Domain Trace?
1333.4Mon Apr 03 1989 13:00 Try MOD MTA/NOLOCAL 10 lines
1333.6Wed Apr 05 1989 16:42 Depends whether trace is used. 6 lines
TOPIC 1403.0 DIGITAL-DG X400 question
1403.6Fri Jul 07 1989 14:16 Contact your local support centre 13 lines
TOPIC 1474.0 Configuration help?
1474.2Fri Jun 16 1989 13:05 MRX has it all! 10 lines
TOPIC 1514.0 Problem upgrading MRX & VOTS
1514.1Mon Jul 03 1989 13:27 MRX V2.1 checks the To-Field Syntax 29 lines
TOPIC 1576.0 MRX last line duplicated
1576.10Thu Aug 17 1989 21:01 There is no fix for this one 9 lines
1576.12Fri Aug 18 1989 12:28 Yes, it's logged 10 lines
TOPIC 1662.0 Should MRX be happy to send messages like this?
1662.5Thu Sep 14 1989 16:53 MRX checks "keyword=value" syntax, not standard attributes 37 lines
1662.7Thu Sep 14 1989 23:14 ...or, then again, maybe MRX is worse than I thought 16 lines
TOPIC 1666.0 lowercase recipient name from All-in-1
1666.1Wed Sep 13 1989 18:22 Please inquire in the ALL-IN-1 conference 12 lines
1666.2Wed Sep 13 1989 18:42 OOPS! MRX also converts to uppercase (from the routestring terms) 9 lines
TOPIC 1684.0 What causes MRX-E-INVHERE?
1684.1Fri Sep 22 1989 12:32 How to report problems 20 lines
TOPIC 1703.0 ALL-IN-1 and MR/X
1703.3Thu Sep 28 1989 11:36 Many customer requirements ARE dubious 13 lines
1703.7Wed Oct 04 1989 19:58 You can do it, but it depends on a few things 38 lines
TOPIC 1716.0 Does MRX convert the body of a message ?
1716.1Fri Oct 06 1989 13:17 Yes, but it won't help 38 lines
TOPIC 1737.0 MRX OUTBOUND QUEUE needs to be cleared
1737.1Tue Oct 17 1989 11:58 Use the MRXMAN> DELETE/QUEUE and MRXMAN> SET SESSION/DELETE commands 16 lines
TOPIC 1818.0 X400 mail directly to yourself
1818.6Wed Nov 29 1989 13:54 MRX doesn't parse addresses outbound 17 lines
TOPIC 1824.0 /NOTIFY on a cluster
1824.3Thu Nov 30 1989 18:07 Yes, MRX polls. 10 lines
TOPIC 1843.0 Sending to Fax Domain
1843.1Fri Dec 08 1989 12:25 MRX will treat @ as a term-separator 31 lines
TOPIC 1863.0 Intra-domain X.400 mail help requested.
1863.1Wed Dec 20 1989 11:57 Register MRGATE users like this.... 31 lines
TOPIC 1864.0 MRX error... RTSPESLN, protocol error.
1864.1Wed Dec 20 1989 12:16 This is a known problem 17 lines
TOPIC 1881.0 Attribute Labels Aliases
1881.1Wed Jan 03 1990 17:30 Keywords abbreviate. 44 lines
1881.3Thu Jan 04 1990 10:45 Yes. 8 lines
1881.5Thu Jan 04 1990 19:48 New product requirements go to the Product Manager 6 lines
1881.7Fri Jan 05 1990 11:05 MRX parses the to field syntax into standard attributes 31 lines
TOPIC 1901.0 Listener logging BADIDENT error.
1901.5Wed Mar 14 1990 16:34 Look at note 1161.* for available documentation 16 lines
TOPIC 1913.0 x.400 configuration?
1913.2Tue Jan 23 1990 19:59 2) isn't so easy 11 lines
1913.3Tue Jan 23 1990 20:03 I didn't quite explain.... 7 lines
TOPIC 1927.0 DDS Field sizes - again!
1927.1Wed Jan 31 1990 11:32 Look at X.400 (or the MRX Management Guide) 13 lines
TOPIC 1943.0 Attribute with Embedded Spaces
1943.6Wed Feb 07 1990 12:42 I can't get the problem 29 lines
1943.9Thu Feb 08 1990 11:21 MRX allows spaces. Please get that clear. 23 lines
1943.12Mon Feb 12 1990 18:49 How can they hide behind that? 17 lines
TOPIC 1946.0 PROFS Extended-MR/P Subject ?error?
1946.3Thu Feb 08 1990 10:42 X.420 does not mandate a subject 16 lines
TOPIC 1949.0 MR/X body parts /Gateway mgt guide docs?
1949.2Thu Feb 08 1990 10:23 All. Yes. No. See .1. 27 lines
TOPIC 1951.0 MRX Duplicated text lines error?
1951.1Thu Feb 08 1990 11:37 Known problem, see your CSC for an MRX S kit 13 lines
TOPIC 1955.0 Automatic DDS registration for X.400 subscribers ?
1955.1Fri Feb 09 1990 12:13 Use the MRX parameter /Alternate_mbx 26 lines
TOPIC 1966.0 NULL TSAP for MRX?
1966.1Thu Feb 15 1990 11:33 Yes, ..nsap, yes 21 lines
TOPIC 1972.0 Message Priorities
1972.1Mon Feb 19 1990 11:19 nonUrgent is less important than normal 12 lines
TOPIC 1977.0 Rampant DDS$OUTQUE.DAT
1977.2Wed Feb 21 1990 15:14 Hmmm, yes, what can we say? 9 lines
TOPIC 1991.0 MRX body type???
1991.1Wed Feb 28 1990 11:57 The news is not good, I'm afraid... 82 lines
TOPIC 1992.0 long lines are broken by CR/LF
1992.3Thu Mar 01 1990 10:45 This is an MRGATE bug. 10 lines
TOPIC 1998.0 MRX routing question
1998.1Thu Mar 01 1990 11:31 Use an MRX "local" MTA entry 70 lines
TOPIC 2000.0 How can I turn off MRX message retention?
2000.2Thu Mar 01 1990 11:44 MRXMAN> modify mta/contr=(nonbskeep,nox409keep,noaccounting) 20 lines
2000.3Thu Mar 01 1990 11:46 Two minds with but a single thought... 3 lines
TOPIC 2011.0 > X.400 UA to MTA via DECnet <
2011.1Wed Mar 07 1990 11:28 Your model of how it works seems to be wrong. 22 lines
TOPIC 2047.0 MR & ARPANET/INTERNET incompatability?
2047.4Thu Mar 29 1990 12:31 ALL-IN-1 IOS uppercases all addresses passing through it 23 lines
TOPIC 2078.0 Mailbus and multiple MRX's
2078.2Mon Apr 02 1990 18:20 .1 is correct 5 lines

Conference abbott::x400mail (DEC MAILworks)

12 posts
TOPIC 38.0 Problem Addressing Mail through X.400 Gateway
38.2Tue Sep 12 1989 07:53 MRX (and X400mail?) will need a sensible USER_ID 29 lines
TOPIC 50.0 Binary body over X.400 ?
50.4Fri Oct 06 1989 09:22 MRX will handle it back-to-back 13 lines
TOPIC 56.0 addressing help
56.4Fri Oct 20 1989 08:07 Small note on the X.400 addresses 8 lines
TOPIC 123.0 P2 conformance
123.2Wed Feb 07 1990 08:08 The only 'dropout' is ... 10 lines
123.6Thu Feb 08 1990 07:18 MRX S2.1-111 is coming sometime; more on P2 conformance. 21 lines
TOPIC 151.0 General Questions on X.400
151.1Fri Feb 23 1990 09:53 Are you talking about MRX ? 146 lines
TOPIC 173.0 ALL-IN-1 IOS/MAIL and WP
173.6Wed Mar 14 1990 08:04 For what it's worth, here's an MRX TBED dump of a Wordperfect V5 54 lines
173.9Fri Mar 16 1990 07:23 The 'unused' is a count of unused bits in the last byte. 50 lines
TOPIC 174.0 X.400/ALL-IN-1/A1mail table
174.1Wed Mar 14 1990 08:33 A couple of points. 40 lines
174.4Fri Mar 16 1990 07:10 Probes 10 lines
TOPIC 188.0 Accented characters ?
188.5Fri Mar 23 1990 06:49 PC and VTs display characters with codes 128-255 differently. 23 lines
TOPIC 209.0 some "feature" type questions
209.3Thu Apr 05 1990 14:17 You need MRX 13 lines

Conference forty2::x400-support-information (X.400 Support Information)

53 posts
TOPIC 17.0 Sign here...
17.58Mon Feb 15 1988 21:40 David Gould 3 lines
TOPIC 59.0 MRX interconnection questions
59.1Tue Feb 23 1988 21:19 Some answers for .0 111 lines
59.3Wed Feb 24 1988 11:45 Called user data - we're talking about something different! 20 lines
TOPIC 65.0 Anybody seen RETIX X.400 software?
65.8Wed Mar 16 1988 16:30 Rename problem known. 7 lines
TOPIC 116.0 MRX connections to multiple ADMDs
116.3Thu Feb 08 1990 12:03 partly 7 lines
116.5Fri Feb 09 1990 17:31 It MIGHT be possible, but you need to assess each case. 27 lines
TOPIC 122.0 no FF in TTX-out!
122.1Fri Jun 10 1988 20:06 Please submit an SPR 7 lines
TOPIC 131.0 MRX in a multi-vendor Domain
131.3Sat Jul 09 1988 13:45 ALL-IN-1 problem fixed next time round 22 lines
TOPIC 177.0 MRX V2.1 and ISO 6937
177.1Tue Oct 18 1988 16:37 Use MTA/CONTROL=ISO6937 18 lines
TOPIC180.0Tue Oct 18 1988 18:46 Network Kits available 38 lines
TOPIC 188.0 Encode thread waiting for DDS transaction
188.1Wed Nov 02 1988 12:56 Two problems: 1)no DDS, 2)bad MTA parameter 23 lines
TOPIC 192.0 MRX without MR
192.1Thu Nov 10 1988 11:47 No. 1 lines
TOPIC 223.0 Using DDA's to uniquely identify recipients
223.1Wed Feb 01 1989 14:00 MRX does not use DDAs to disambiguate recipients 31 lines
TOPIC 230.0 MRX drops DeliveryInformation??
230.1Fri Feb 10 1989 13:54 Yes; can't say; everything (nearly). 14 lines
TOPIC 239.0 FYI on MRX support guide - OSAK trace info
239.1Wed Mar 01 1989 13:35 Release notes are right, support guides are wrong 32 lines
TOPIC 241.0 Sessions to TELEMAIL hanging
241.10Thu Mar 22 1990 11:55 It has been reported 10 lines
241.12Fri Mar 23 1990 12:44 There seems to be problems at both sides 28 lines
TOPIC 254.0 What is ISO 6937 char set, how does it relate to ISO LATIN1
254.2Tue Nov 14 1989 20:26 ISO6937 is MOTIS 19 lines
TOPIC 258.0 MRX USERID/ROUTE for recipient params - Domain mbo
258.1Fri Jun 02 1989 13:01 The Support Guide has the answers 23 lines
TOPIC 265.0 MRX Relaying
265.1Wed Jun 28 1989 13:16 NBS Relay - the true story 24 lines
265.5Thu Jun 29 1989 13:55 MTA dictionary is searched first 32 lines
265.8Thu Jun 29 1989 18:00 Support Guide is correct. 17 lines
265.10Thu Jun 29 1989 21:35 Some more answers 46 lines
265.15Wed Sep 06 1989 18:40 Relaying rules (OK?) 32 lines
TOPIC 268.0 MRX P2 support
268.1Fri Jul 07 1989 14:27 Because MRX provides MTA services 14 lines
268.3Tue Jul 11 1989 14:08 There ARE restrictions - see the usual places 19 lines
TOPIC 276.0 MRX routing revisited
276.3Thu Jul 20 1989 13:11 MTA relay is performed first. and without bodypart translations. 11 lines
TOPIC 282.0 Lower case O/R names
282.3Tue Sep 19 1989 13:24 Yes, Henry reported it 8 lines
TOPIC 289.0 MRXTBED TRANSLATE for TELETEX_OUT
289.1Tue Sep 05 1989 15:01 Not quite the same... 11 lines
TOPIC 296.0 Lowercase recipient O/Rname
296.1Wed Sep 13 1989 19:07 You would have to use message router standard attributes. 26 lines
TOPIC 303.0 help with SUN installation
303.1Fri Oct 20 1989 11:50 Use MRXTBED to find states. 46 lines
TOPIC 307.0 MRX problem during Relay
307.1Wed Nov 01 1989 14:48 MRX translates if it cannot relay using MTA entries 37 lines
307.4Fri Nov 03 1989 13:18 LOCAL MTAs get "delivered" to 12 lines
TOPIC 316.0 MRX stops logging
316.9Mon Feb 19 1990 11:41 Here is one possibility. 7 lines
TOPIC 317.0 X.400 with UNISYS, TSAP lowercase????
317.8Fri Dec 08 1989 18:05 In English, 'digit' does NOT mean 'character'. 29 lines
TOPIC 321.0 Can you repost a .X409 file?
321.2Mon Dec 18 1989 17:19 Use the SEND command 6 lines
TOPIC 323.0 P2 and MRX
323.4Mon Jan 29 1990 15:42 All of them. 6 lines
323.5Mon Jan 29 1990 15:51 ...except for deliveryInformation 10 lines
TOPIC 324.0 Can private domains be part of the same DDS network?
324.2Mon Jan 08 1990 11:15 Remember.... 4 lines
TOPIC 327.0 Way to Speed Up Gateway
327.5Thu Feb 22 1990 11:13 Yes and no. 14 lines
TOPIC 329.0 MRX 2.1 on a VAXserver (limited interactive users)
329.1Thu Feb 01 1990 16:07 Hazy recollection.... 12 lines
TOPIC 336.0 Clarification Message exp timers
336.2Tue Mar 13 1990 12:07 As I've answered a request on this recently.... 25 lines
TOPIC 337.0 MRX and UACONTID - 16 bytes only. Why?
337.1Tue Mar 06 1990 17:35 Not the standard; the functional profiles 4 lines
TOPIC 338.0 WARNING.TXT & DEC/EDI
338.1Tue Mar 06 1990 17:37 No, sorry. 5 lines
TOPIC 339.0 DCFERROR connecting to TANDEM
339.1Thu Mar 08 1990 12:41 MRXTBED 'parse' is not a sufficient test 43 lines
339.4Fri Mar 09 1990 12:42 You need to have a quiet word with your customer... 6 lines
TOPIC 345.0 MRX & X.400
345.3Wed Mar 21 1990 12:34 It depends on what X.400 bodypart you want to send to the peer MTA 70 lines
TOPIC 347.0 ODA/CDA via X.400 ?
347.1Mon Mar 26 1990 21:51 It's in the functional profiles 8 lines
347.3Tue Apr 03 1990 17:21 Correct, plus a tiny bit of information. 25 lines
347.4Tue Apr 03 1990 17:24 for DDIF$READ_CDA.EXE, read DDIF$READ_ODA.EXE 3 lines
347.6Thu Apr 05 1990 17:59 Yes 9 lines
TOPIC 348.0 Soft.Switch & binary files
348.2Fri Mar 30 1990 12:17 The trouble is, NIST have published an agreed format 30 lines
TOPIC 351.0 How to generate P2 originator,primaryRecipients
351.1Wed Apr 04 1990 15:44 MRX is unfussy about P2 elements 60 lines

Conference rocks::mr-telex-gateway (VAX MR-TELEX)

1 posts
TOPIC 2.0 Membership Registry
2.22Wed Jul 27 1988 23:34 David Gould 6 lines

Additional information

First Post:Mon Feb 15 1988
Last Post:Thu Apr 05 1990
# Topics:1
# Replies:130
# We have note bodies for:0
Total memory used by this script: 888,320 (4,194,304)