[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference gyro::internet_toolss

Title:Internet Tools
Notice:Report ALL NETSCAPE Problems directly to kdlucas@netscape.com.rnet? Read note 448.L for beginner information.
Moderator:teco.mro.dec.com::tecotoo.mro.dec.com::mayer
Created:Fri Jun 25 1993
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4714
Total number of notes:40609

2509.0. "DNS reordering for load balancing?" by WOTVAX::stus.olo.dec.com::HATTOS (Don't delete your Windows directory) Thu Aug 24 1995 08:11

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2509.1bind round robin featureWRLMTS::VIGEANTWayne Vigeant DTN 543-1380Thu Aug 24 1995 16:4415
2509.2WOTVAX::HATTOSIt's simple - but it's not easyThu Aug 24 1995 17:069
2509.3see bind 4.9.xWRLMTS::VIGEANTWayne Vigeant DTN 543-1380Mon Aug 28 1995 17:152
2509.4WOTVAX::stus.olo.dec.com::HATTOSDon't delete your Windows directoryTue Aug 29 1995 10:521
2509.5CRONIC::LEMONSAnd we thank you for your support.Mon Feb 10 1997 13:2018
    I have a slightly different need, which a twist of this technology may
    address.  We have two LANs in our building.  We're deploying NTP, and
    will set up two NTP servers on each LAN.  For obvious network
    performance reasons, we'd like all the NTP clients on LAN A to sync
    with the two LAN A servers, and the LAN B NTP clients to sync with the
    LAN B NTP server.  But, this is proving difficult to deploy.  We'd like
    to use SMS to automate the installation of the NTP client on hundreds
    of Windows systems, and I can't think of any clean way to.
    
    So I'm wondering if DNS could come to the rescue.  It would be very
    neat to use the same two NTP server names across our site, but have
    them translate to the correct servers, based on the LAN the client is
    in.  Each client is configured with the same two site DNS servers,
    though (I hope) the LAN A DNS server is listed first on LAN A clients. 
    Hmm.  Is there an opportunity here?
    
    Thanks!
    tl
2509.6DNS is meant to be consistentPARZVL::16.124.40.127::kennedynuncam non paratusMon Feb 10 1997 19:2921
Terry,

I don't think you can have the same name resolve
to 2 different pointers, depending on the client
address - that would violate the rules of DNS, which
is basically trying to provide a consistent view
of name to address translation.

I'm not sure this is even worth worrying about, if
your concern is traffic - NTP is not going to cause
much overhead in the routers. 

Some alternative possibilities:
- different SMS profiles for each LAN, so you could
  specify the local DNS & NTP servers (and any other
  things which need to change based on network address -
  how is the default router set?)
- all the hosts use the same name for the NTP server, but
  it's defined (differently for each subnet) in a local
  HOSTS file.