Conference ljsrv1::tv_chatter

    
    Thanks, I'll check it out.  Do you think they will keep it on Monday
    nights or was that just for her premier?
    
    lou

    Monday at 9:00, for an hour - supposedly!  ;-)
    
    NAZZ

    I liked this one a lot. I will watch it.  We get it in Colorado Springs
    on Fridays right after X-Files on channel 21.

    
    As the base note mentions, it has a lot of the "Fugitive" and some
    of the "X-files". 
    
    Very good show so far.
    
    Dave
    
    

    
    This week's episode also has a lot of "The Prisoner" in it.
    

        I also am disappointed in the 2nd and 3rd episodes, but both of
    	them sure brought back memories of "The Prisoner".  I hope the next 
    	one gets them back to the level they had on the 1st.
    

    Last show confirmed for me that this show has quickly fallen from my
    "must watch" list.
    
    NAZZ

    
    I thought last night's (10-9-95) was pretty good.  If this one is going 
    to be representative of future ones, then I think it is starting to
    pick back up again - after several ho-hum episodes - and it is back on
    my watch list. I especially liked the ending.
    
    Tom isn't quite as predictable as they thougt he was, is he ...  :-)

    
    Did anyone watch the Christmas episode?  At the end Tom reads a note
    from his wife. Could someone tell me what it said? It was probably
    important to the storyline, but since I had eye surgery a few weeks
    ago, I cannot see well, so I could not read it. Thanks, Marge

[spoiler warning]
>     
>     Did anyone watch the Christmas episode?  At the end Tom reads a note
>     from his wife. Could someone tell me what it said? It was probably
>     important to the storyline, but since I had eye surgery a few weeks
>     ago, I cannot see well, so I could not read it. Thanks, Marge

	I don't normally watch this show but was trying to keep it
	easy with a cold so catch this episode.

	The note said something like "how did you guess?".  The tape
	made it obvious (even though I had guess the whole visit to
	the mall was staged beforehand) that the whole thing was
	staged.

    I recall there was a "so where did you hide the negative anyways?"
    p.s. to the note.
    
    BTW, it would seem to me to be very lax of the people hunting for it
    not to have set up a hidden camera to watch where he gets the negative
    from, and immediately grab it from him.
    
    To me, there some MAJOR holes in the whole premise.

    spoilers
    
    
    So was it really Allison or someone acting as Allison.  If it was 
    really Allison, how is she linked with the ones who want the negative
    and how did they get her to work with them? And was it really his mother 
    and same question?
    
    It is rough not to be able to see well enough to even watch TV :-)

    This episode let you think it was answering some questions, but it
    simply made those questions more preplexing.  Now, this could either be
    viewed as entertaining, as a way to continue to involve the viewer in
    the plot, or as a cheap ploy designed to keep the viewer watching.  If
    it is the latter, it backfired with me.  I'm an occasional viewer, but
    I was disappointed in how this episode ended up in that it was so
    predictable.  I know Tom thought so, too!
    
    NAZZ

    Also..when he read the note about "how'd you guess?", didn't he just
    peel the negatives out of a lamp-shade?  I thought this was weird that
    they would turn the place upside-down and miss where he hid them.
    
    I expected he was just tricking them at first to test them..
    
    This is the dumbest show I've ever looked forward to (but perhaps I'm
    just not thinking back hard enough :) ).
    
    -- brandon

	Well I turned on the tube a few minutes before 9 to see if I
	could catch the previews for next weeks ST:VOY episode (to see
	if it would be another re-run, and it will be).

	Well this show came on after and I caught some pieces of it.
	After now seeing a good chunck of two episodes I believe where
	I've seen this show before.....

	This show appears to be a rip-off of the old series "The Prisoner"!!!

    
    	Just curious - I only saw one show and the time slot is not
    	good for me to catch it...did they explain what was so
    	important about the picture...TO me it shows nothing since
    	they have bags over their heads?
    
    	Did they get into why this is so important...?SOmeone told
    	me that one episode with Dean Stockwell implied that his
    	picture of the hanging people were not as critical as
    	someone in the background.??
    
    

    The other things that I thought were kinda dumb, besides the fact that
    they tore the whole house apart and did not find the negatives as prior
    noter also said, was that while they were tearing the house apart, Tom 
    was in the house and did not even hear them.  Should have been lots of
    noise with all that destruction. Also, since they knew both Tom and the 
    negatives were in house, why didn't they just force him give them the 
    negatives, instead of leaving without them.
    

    RE: The Prisoner
    
    Did anyone else notice the number they gave Vale when he joined up?
    Was that intentional on the part of the writers?
    
    Ken

Huh.  Didn't even notice.

I knew something was eating away at me about that number...

    OK - I'll bite.  What was the number?
    
    NAZZ

    I've stuck with this series from the beginning but it is really
    beginning to try my patience.  They just get worse and worse.
    I think Nowhere Man is nowhere, man.