[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference ljsrv1::tv_chatter

Title:The TV Chatter Notes Conference
Notice:Welcome to TV Chatter :-)
Moderator:PASTA::PIERCE
Created:Wed Dec 16 1992
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:498
Total number of notes:5416

112.0. "Predictions/If I Were a Network Exec" by DEMON::DEMON::COURT (Everybody thought it was a dog.) Thu Apr 29 1993 07:54

    Would anybody care to make any predictions about the upcoming fall
    schedule announcements?  Do you think there will be any surprise
    renewals or cancellations?
    
    This is a surprise renewal:         This is not:
    
      Fox renews "Class of '96."          CBS renews "60 Minutes."
    
    This is a surprise cancellation:    This is not:
    
      ABC cancels "Full House."           NBC cancels "Out All Night."
    
    
    If you were programming a night on one of the networks, what would you
    like to see?
    
    Mike
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
112.1My 1993-94 SeasonDEMON::DEMON::COURTEverybody thought it was a dog.Thu Apr 29 1993 08:1636
    NBC Thursday Night:
    
      I'd like to see them pair up "Seinfeld" and "Mad About You" again.  I
      think they'd work best at 9:00 and 9:30, but 8:00 and 8:30 would be
      okay, too.  I'd like to see "L.A. Law" moved to a night where it can
      die quietly, giving the 10:00 timeslot to something a little bit more
      fresh, like "I'll Fly Away," "Sisters," or even "Reasonable Doubts."
    
    Fox Sunday Night:
    
      Lose "Married with Children" and "In Living Color," and develop
      stronger, more adult comedies.  I'd like to see "Flying Blind" in an
      earlier timeslot, paired with "Herman's Head."  "Roc" and "Martin"
      would make a good pair, too.  Call Jonathan Winters' and Randy 
      Quaid's agents, and make another go of "Davis Rules."
    
    ABC Sunday Night:
    
      Bring back "Life Goes On," and cancel "America's Funniest..."  I can
      dream, can't I?
    
    CBS Monday Night:
    
      Have Murphy's baby spontaneously combust in the first episode, or
      reveal that the last season was a dream.  Keep "Evening Shade"
      around.  Hire Annie Potts to replace Susan Dey on "Love and War," and
      consider moving it to 8:30.  Axe the John Ritter sitcom and replace it 
      with another stuggling series, such as "Bob," "Brookyln Bridge," or even 
      "Major Dad."  (Guilty pleasure.)  Or call the producers of "Flying Blind"
      and offer them the 9:30 time slot.  I think the show would fit in very 
      well between Murphy and "Northern Exposure."
    
    
    Back to my real job...
    
    Mike
112.2SUFRNG::WSA038::SATTERFIELDClose enough for jazz.Fri Apr 30 1993 06:2727

Series I would like to see renewed:

Homefront
Pickett Fences
Northern Exposure
Star Trek: TNG
Star Trek: DS9
The Wonder Years
Seinfeld
Tribeca
Young Indiana Jones
Homicide
Civil Wars
Key West


Reality:

The Wonder Years, Young Indiana Jones, and Key West are history. Homefront
and Civil Wars are probably history. Northern Exposure, both Star Treks, and
Seinfeld will definatly be renewed, Pickett Fences probably will be. The
others are up in the air.


Randy
112.3Network exec doesn't count here.MOMAX1::WOODTue May 04 1993 07:257
    
    
    Both Star Treks are syndicated, the network does'nt produce them.   
    
    
    
        -=-=-R~C~W-=-=-
112.4exitBUSY::KVILLANIFri May 07 1993 08:2811
    I would dump Married with Children, In Living Color, Hermans head, etc.
    get my drift?   I agree with .1  I think that we need to get rid of
    some of these real senseless shows.  Comedy is wonderful, but let's
    have a more mature comedic series.  Even Drama shows are starting to
    get cancelled or fade away.
    
    It is nothing like the Golden years of T.V.  and I was not even born
    yet to see those shows, but the studying I have done on this form of
    "art"  it has changed drastically.  Too bad!
    
    Karen
112.5HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri May 07 1993 08:3715
  There seem to be very few replies here but I'm curious about those who did
answer. Are you saying that if you were an executive in charge of programming
and that your future depended on making money for the network that you would
make those moves or is this just another "I like this, I don't like that"
note?

  Were someone to ask me "If you were a network exec what would you run on the
air?" my answer would be very different than if they asked me "What would you
like to see on TV?".

  The 1st list would be a list of programs I thought would make money.

  The 2nd list would be a list of programs that I actually wanted to watch.

  George
112.6PAMSRC::63508::BARRETTI must not waste bandwidthFri May 07 1993 09:2920
It it were me, I'd keep shows at their original timeslots rather
than moving things around all the time. Or at the very least, only
move them when in repeats and then move them back each season start.
Took me forever to get use to Simpsons being on Thursdays instead
of the Weekend.

I think this was one of the reasons for the success of older shows,
you could plan to watch "Mary Tyler Moore", "Bob Newhart", etc all
in a row (even if different channels were involved). Nowadays, when I
start watching a new show, as soon as it gets moved I lose track of it
and stop watching it.

I believe people need time to build patterns, set schedules, etc. For
example, I KNOW Northern Exposure is on Monday nights - don't even have
to think about it. If they ever move it, I'll probably lose track of it.

I think the idea of breaking apart a set of popular shows to move them
near other shows that require help is bogus. All you end up with is
2 shows with weak followings, and eventual cancellations. Cancel the
weak shows and leave the others alone.