[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference lgp30::christian-perspective

Title:Discussions from a Christian Perspective
Notice:Prostitutes and tax collectors welcome!
Moderator:CSC32::J_CHRISTIE
Created:Mon Sep 17 1990
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1362
Total number of notes:61362

1360.0. "Mark 2.26" by CSC32::J_CHRISTIE (Spigot of pithiness) Thu May 29 1997 19:20

Mark 2:26 (Jesus speaking)

    How he [David] went into the house of God in the days of
Abiathar the high priest, and did eat the showbread, which is
not lawful to eat but for the priests, and gave also to them
which were with him?

According to I Samuel 21.1-6, it is not Abiathar who gives David
and his troops the bread.  How do those taking the inerrantist position
concerning the Bible explain this?

Richard

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1360.1CPCOD::JOHNSONPeace can't be founded on injusticeFri May 30 1997 20:449
Richard,

I don't see a problem between these texts. Mark 2:26 does not say Abiathar 
gave the showbread to David and his men. It says the action occured in the 
days when Abiathar was the high priest. And the account in Sammuel does not
call the priest Ahimelech the high priest, it just refers to him as being
a priest.

Leslie
1360.2CSC32::J_CHRISTIESpigot of pithinessFri May 30 1997 22:0210
    Reading on a little further in I Samuel (chapter 22), it does say
    that Abiathar was the son of Ahimelech, but I don't find where it
    identifies Abiathar as being the high priest at the time.
    
    Maybe you can tell me, Leslie, how did one become a high priest
    in ancient times?  And what distinguished the high priest from other
    priests at the time?
    
    Richard
    
1360.3inheritedPHXSS1::HEISERMaranatha!Fri May 30 1997 23:441
    Being a high priest was a family thing at the time of Christ.  
1360.4CSC32::J_CHRISTIESpigot of pithinessSat May 31 1997 00:5810
.3

>    Being a high priest was a family thing at the time of Christ.  

This being so at the time of David, Abiathar would have inherited the
office from his father Ahimelech, who, as Leslie has pointed out, is
not identified as high priest, but simply priest.

Richard

1360.5CSC32::J_CHRISTIESpigot of pithinessMon Jun 02 1997 03:3711
.0

Here's what I think.  I think it's a boo-boo.  I think the author
of Mark (or perhaps a copyist) got a wire crossed and set down the
name Abiathar instead of Ahimelech.

It's a small mistake in my estimation and doesn't affect the thrust
of the message.

Richard

1360.6Will Do Some ResearchCPCOD::JOHNSONPeace can't be founded on injusticeMon Jun 02 1997 17:335
I shall do some research for you. I don't think Mike's answer is complete.
I do not think anyone got wires crossed. 

Leslie

1360.7CSC32::J_CHRISTIESpigot of pithinessTue Jun 03 1997 16:227
    .6
    
    I look forward to seeing what you uncover.
    
    Shalom,
    Richard