[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference lgp30::christian-perspective

Title:Discussions from a Christian Perspective
Notice:Prostitutes and tax collectors welcome!
Moderator:CSC32::J_CHRISTIE
Created:Mon Sep 17 1990
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1362
Total number of notes:61362

969.0. "Resist evil, injustice and oppression" by CSC32::J_CHRISTIE (Crossfire) Thu Sep 15 1994 02:56

One of the questions asked during the ceremony of baptism in the United
Methodist Church is this:

"Do you accept the freedom and power that God gives you to
   resist evil, injustice, and oppression
   in whatever form they present themselves?"

I'm not certain what goes through the minds of Christians when they say
"I do" to this commitment.  Perhaps some think it's simply an inconsequential
formality.  Perhaps some actually believe they don't encounter these things
in their lives.  Perhaps some even take such a commitment very seriously.

How would you take it?

Shalom,
Richard

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
969.1Too generalizedDNEAST::DALELIO_HENRThu Sep 15 1994 10:2416
  I think its a good thought, but from my point of view I would question 
  whether it should be part of the baptismal ceremony.
  
  Its a very subjective question. The person might see abortion (for instance)
  as a violation of the "foetus" life and feel compelled to picket an abortion
  clinic. On the other hand they might want to march in a gay rights parade.
  Its too general as it appears.

  Are infants baptised in the UMC, do the godparents answer for the infant?
  If so, will the infant have opportunity to confirm the vicarious committment 
  at their confirmation?

  My thoughts

  Hank
969.2POWDML::FLANAGANI feel therefore I amThu Sep 15 1994 13:147
    Richard,
    
    That is a wonderful statement to include in the UMC ritual.  
    
    Is that a standard part of the UMC baptism ritual.
    
                           Patricia
969.3curiousLGP30::FLEISCHERwithout vision the people perish (DTN 297-5780, MRO3-3/L16)Thu Sep 15 1994 13:3016
re Note 969.0 by CSC32::J_CHRISTIE:

> One of the questions asked during the ceremony of baptism in the United
> Methodist Church is this:
> 
> "Do you accept the freedom and power that God gives you to
>    resist evil, injustice, and oppression
>    in whatever form they present themselves?"
  
        How long has this statement in this form been a part of the
        rite?

        (It sounds kind of "modern" -- and I hope you know me well
        enough to know that I mean no criticism in this respect.)

        Bob
969.4a principle is like thatLGP30::FLEISCHERwithout vision the people perish (DTN 297-5780, MRO3-3/L16)Thu Sep 15 1994 13:3720
re Note 969.1 by DNEAST::DALELIO_HENR:

>   Its a very subjective question. The person might see abortion (for instance)
>   as a violation of the "foetus" life and feel compelled to picket an abortion
>   clinic. On the other hand they might want to march in a gay rights parade.
>   Its too general as it appears.
  
        I think that part of its power is its generality.

        It sets a principle, rather than laying out detailed rules. 
        As a principle it calls on the Christian to thoughtfully and
        prayerfully consider how God calls them to live out this
        principle in the life they have been given.

        Of course principles can be misapplied, but even 100-page
        legal documents can be misapplied!  That is the nature of
        natural language (and which is why brevity is often a
        virtue).

        Bob
969.5CSLALL::HENDERSONI'm the traveller, He's the WayThu Sep 15 1994 14:0116
RE:               <<< Note 969.0 by CSC32::J_CHRISTIE "Crossfire" >>>
                   -< Resist evil, injustice and oppression >-


>How would you take it?


 I'd say thank you very much and walk out.  I don't see such a requirement
 in any Biblical baptism.




Jim

969.7CSC32::J_CHRISTIECrossfireThu Sep 15 1994 16:2718
.1

>  Are infants baptised in the UMC(?),

Yes.

>do the godparents answer for the infant?

Parents, usually, and others present willing to accept the responsibility.

>  If so, will the infant have opportunity to confirm the vicarious committment 
>  at their confirmation?

Yes, at confirmation.

Shalom,
Richard

969.8CSC32::J_CHRISTIECrossfireThu Sep 15 1994 16:4015
.3

>        How long has this statement in this form been a part of the
>        rite?

To be perfectly honest, I don't know.  It is included in the relatively
new hymnal (less than 10 years old, as I recall).

Resisting evil, injustice and oppression is deeply imbedded in the Jewish
faith and affirmed by the gospel of Jesus Christ.  Jesus didn't institute
the notion, but neither did he institute baptism.

Shalom,
Richard

969.9CSLALL::HENDERSONI'm the traveller, He's the WayThu Sep 15 1994 16:4310

 Hmm...I thought Matthew 28:19 mentioned Baptism (and they were Jesus'
 words).





Jim
969.11CSC32::J_CHRISTIECrossfireThu Sep 15 1994 17:0711
    .9  Come on, Jim!  Pay attention!  I didn't say Jesus didn't
    advocate baptism!  Reread what I said.
    
    Furthermore, there's no small argument as to whether Jesus meant
    baptizing  (immersing, as with water) people in the name of Father,
    the Son and the Holy Spirit, or whether he meant baptizing them
    (in water) in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy
    Spirit.  But this is grist for another topic.
    
    Shalom,
    Richard
969.14CSLALL::HENDERSONI'm the traveller, He's the WayThu Sep 15 1994 17:5312

 RE .11


 My apologies for misunderstanding.  Who, then, instituted Baptism?





Jim
969.15UnclearCSC32::J_CHRISTIECrossfireThu Sep 15 1994 18:088
    According to a course I took in New Testament history a few years
    back, the ritual of baptism was practiced by some Jews and can be
    found in other religions, including some of what were called the
    'Mystery Religions'.
    
    Shalom,
    Richard
    
969.16I disagree, but..CSLALL::HENDERSONI'm the traveller, He's the WayThu Sep 15 1994 18:103

 Oh.
969.18I won't try to change your mind. I promise.CSC32::J_CHRISTIECrossfireThu Sep 15 1994 19:113
    .16  You disagree?  On principle?  Because you don't like me, or what
    I believe, or have to say?
    
969.19CSLALL::HENDERSONI'm the traveller, He's the WayThu Sep 15 1994 19:168

 I believe that God institued the ordinance of Baptism..




Jim
969.21CSC32::J_CHRISTIECrossfireFri Sep 16 1994 16:106
    .20  Believe me, I didn't plan it that way.  At least it's still
    tangentally related to the basenote.
    
    Shalom,
    Richard