[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference lgp30::christian-perspective

Title:Discussions from a Christian Perspective
Notice:Prostitutes and tax collectors welcome!
Moderator:CSC32::J_CHRISTIE
Created:Mon Sep 17 1990
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1362
Total number of notes:61362

318.0. "On the nature and authority of Tradition" by XANADU::FLEISCHER (without vision the people perish (381-0899 ZKO3-2/T63)) Mon Sep 23 1991 13:55

        I thought it might be worthwhile to start a note string on
        the topic of "Tradition".

        In Note 34.319, Jack Martin (KEYWST::MARTIN) writes:

>     Actually, I am aware that many
>     churches put an equal authority on tradition.  
...
>     I guess the thing that peaks my curiosity is where the source
>     of that belief comes from.  An idea has to have an origin.  A belief 
>     that contradicts not only Christs claims, but the Old Testament as
>     well, came from...(where)?  
  
        Jack,

        Where in Scripture does "equal authority on tradition" per se
        contradict "Christ's claims" or the Old Testament?

        Yes, "an idea has to have an origin," and it is a worthy
        object of curiosity to find out its source.  On the other
        hand, you will find that for a great many ideas, the actual
        origin is unknown and unknowable.  The important thing isn't
        so much where an idea comes from, but where it takes us. 
        Perhaps ideas should be tested as Scripture suggests we test
        things:  by their fruits, by their conformance with other
        things we know to be true.

        Are you of the opinion that the only reliably true ideas are
        found in Scripture?  If so, where did that idea come from?

        Bob
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
318.1I Press on Toward the GoalKEYWST::MARTINTue Sep 24 1991 02:2065
    Hi Bob,
    
    Amazingly, I came across this string, not of my own doing.  I flipped
    to this note by chance and surprisingly enough, found I was quoted.
    I would like to start by sighting a passage found in Matthew 15.
    
    "Then some pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem saying,
    "Why do your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders?  For
    they do not wash their hands when they eat bread."  And he answered and
    said to them, "And why do you yourselves transgress the commandment of
    God for the sake of your tradition?  For God said, 'Honor your Father
    and your Mother, and he who speaks evil of Father or Mother, Let him be
    put to death.' "But you say, 'Whoever shall say to his father or
    mother, "Anything of mine you might have been helped by has been given
    to God," he is not to honor his father or his mother.' And thus you
    invalidated the word of God for the sake of your tradition.  "You
    hypocrites, rightly did Isaiah prophesy of you, saying, 'This people
    honors me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. 'But in
    vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of mere
    men.'"
    
    To answer how tradition contradicts the claims of Christ and even the
    Old Testament can actually be rolled up in this passage.  Christ was
    speaking to the religious leaders of that day and giving them what I
    would call, a high rebuke.  Why?  Because of their self righteousness,
    they felt they had the authority to add to the Mosaic law, thus
    controlling the masses.  If you study church history, you may be very
    surprised to find that denominations fell into the same trap of adding
    their own teachings.  Only TRADITIONAL interpretation and expansion of
    the law required the washing of hands, the Written law DID NOT.  Only
    priests needed to make an ablution before eating to cleanse themselves
    from anything unclean.  You can also see that Christ accused them of
    also negating the commandment about honoring parents. " ... By their
    traditions, they nullify the word of God."  
    
    Now I would also like to make one other thing clear.  I have absolutely
    nothing against some tradition, but only if it is not misused.  I know in my
    family, their are traditions we have that bring us close together, I.E.
    birthdays, Christmas, eating Turkey on Thanksgiving (Even though the
    original pilgrims didn't eat turkey)  Another historical fact that
    tradition nullified, but I don't care if you don't.
    
    My problems with tradition pretty much fall under the same situation
    Christ had in Matthew 15.  As I speak to many individuals throughout my
    life, I speak to many religious people, regular church goers, decent
    law abiding citizens that say Christ was the greatest teacher in the
    world.  He was a man that gave great sermons on loving thy neighbor,
    he laid the philosophy of good christian living.  This teaching is
    absolutely true and holds high merit.  Unfortunately, these same
    institutions deny the deity and messiahship of Christ.  Some claim that
    Jesus isn't the only way.  In essence, the Pharisee's also claimed that
    Jesus wasn't the only way.  A tough pill to swallow I know.  
    
    The decision is an individual one, this is mandated by the bible.  We
    all can choose what we want to believe.  I for one believe the ancient
    hebrew prophets died horribly to bring the message of salvation to us.
    If I believed my personal righteousness (which really doesn't exist) 
    could match what Christ did on the cross, It would be as though my
    traditional belief would nullify what Christ did and would thus reject
    His plan of salvation.  It is to me a dangerous thing to do.
    
    Warmly in Christ,
    
    Jack
    
318.2sweeping conclusions warranted?XANADU::FLEISCHERwithout vision the people perish (381-0899 ZKO3-2/T63)Tue Sep 24 1991 13:2626
re Note 318.1 by KEYWST::MARTIN:

>     To answer how tradition contradicts the claims of Christ and even the
>     Old Testament can actually be rolled up in this passage.  Christ was
>     speaking to the religious leaders of that day and giving them what I
>     would call, a high rebuke.  Why?  Because of their self righteousness,
>     they felt they had the authority to add to the Mosaic law, thus
>     controlling the masses.  If you study church history, you may be very

        You seem to be leaping to the conclusion that since the
        religious leaders which confronted Christ had abused the
        masses in the name of tradition, that therefore all tradition
        is dross.  That doesn't seem to be in the passage (although
        one traditional interpretation of this passages is as you
        say).

>     Some claim that
>     Jesus isn't the only way.  In essence, the Pharisee's also claimed that
>     Jesus wasn't the only way.  A tough pill to swallow I know.  
  
        Claiming that "Jesus isn't the only way" certainly isn't a
        part of any tradition of any Christian or pseudo-Christian
        sect I know of, so I don't see the relevance.  I don't think
        that the Pharisees considered Jesus to be any way at all.

        Bob
318.3Sacred "T" Tradition Isn't "t" traditionPCCAD1::RICHARDJBluegrass,Music Of PerfekchunTue Sep 24 1991 16:478
    
    
    "So then, brethren, stand firm and HOLD TO THE TRADITIONS which you
     were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter."
     2 Thessalonians 2:15
    
    Peace
    Jim
318.4Not All Tradition is Dross!KEYWST::MARTINTue Sep 24 1991 19:2039
    Yes, I agree with 2 Thessolonians 2:15.  We are to HOLD TO THE
    TRADITIONS which were taught by us; either by word of mouth or by
    letter.  I believe this is referring to the written word of God which
    is to be handed down through discipleship and fellowship with
    believers.  Paul also confirms the Bible as sacred Tradition in a
    letter to Timothy where he states that ALL scripture is inspired by God
    and is profitable for reproof, correction, and training in
    righteousness.  
    
    As far as all traditions being dross, on the contrary.  I find certain
    traditions to be very edifying.  As stated in note 1, there are
    traditions not necessarily ordained by God, yet hold value in bringing
    families close together, help marriages to be maintained, members of a
    nation to come together.  I find for example the 4th of July to be one
    of my favorite traditions as it alerts people to be thankful for the
    freedoms we have (at least for now).  Christmas is also a favorite as I
    can use to talk about Christian matters with family.
    
    We need to remember however that there are traditional teachings in our
    churches that can actually destroy foundations of faith, just as the
    Pharisees in Matthew 15.  I feel the difference in philosophy with many
    is that some think Christ was the greatest teacher; however, they only
    accept the teachings that fit into their scheme of thinking.  The rest
    of his teaching is ignored.  That is why he rebuked the pharisees.
    
    Tradition is not dross.  It can be a great thing.  Just make sure it is
    used in the proper context of life.  An old traditional tale we tell
    kids is that if you lose a tooth, the fairy god mother will leave a
    quarter under your pillow.  A child can believe this until they come to
    an age of reason.  Believe it or not, there are traditional teachings
    out there in the adult world that leave people in a total state of
    confusion.  Am I perfect, certainly not.  I want to strive for it so 
    I will hope follow sound doctrine and not the empty teachings of mere
    men.  I know I have a long way to go and I as you read this note, I
    sincerely hope that you understand, I want to be teachable!
    
    Warmly in Christ,
    
    Jack