[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference kaosws::canada

Title:True North Strong & Free
Notice:Introduction in Note 535, For Sale/Wanted in 524
Moderator:POLAR::RICHARDSON
Created:Fri Jun 19 1987
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1040
Total number of notes:13668

799.0. "Lucien B. defeating himself ?" by KAOFS::D_STREET () Fri Feb 25 1994 20:09

    Enough of the fun and games. 
    
     Lucien B. has really got to be a self serving jerk. The government
    closes training bases in Quebec and B.C. and to hear him talk about it
    you would think they only closed the one in Quebec. Is this the same
    mouthpiece that demanded fiscal responsibility, and then wanted
    compensation for the cancellation of the helocopter contract. YES !!
    He must be bilingual, he speaks out of both sides of his mouth.
    
     The man has no credability because he only speaks for Quebec's side of
    issues that concern Quebec. One trick ponies are of little value.
    
    
    SOOOO, does his only what is good for Quebec approach discredit his
    opinion ?
    
     It does in my opinion.
    
    							Derek.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
799.1POLAR::RICHARDSONSick in balanced sort of wayMon Feb 28 1994 12:124
    Well, if you don't like Lucien's approach, then there must be something
    good about it. I'll have to take a closer look to find out what it is.

    Glenn
799.2CTHU26::S_BURRIDGEMon Feb 28 1994 12:398
    Bouchard is in Ottawa, he says, to promote the interests of Quebec;
    really to try to discredit the federal system in every way he can and
    thus promote Quebec independence.  He doesn't care how the things he
    says sound elsewhere in the country.  The important question, and the
    only one he cares about, is:  how are his statements received in
    Quebec?
    
    -Stephen
799.3The medium is the message (or so they would like to think)KAOFS::D_STREETMon Feb 28 1994 12:5111
    CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE
    
     Interesting point. I suppose it depends on how faithful the media is
    in representing the facts. If they only parrot what he says there is no
    doubt he will be well recieved, if they present the full picture, there
    is a chance that he will be exposed as the "spin doctor" that he is. I
    have about as much faith in the Quebec media as I do in Lucien himself.
    I expect the oppressed masses of Quebec will devour this serving of
    self pity with relish, regardless of the reality of the situation.
    
    							Derek.
799.4CTHP12::M_MORINA dead man with the most toys is still a dead man.Mon Feb 28 1994 18:3822
Derek,

Please remember as you read on that I despise Lucien and I think he is a big 
joke.  I wish we had a more credible opposition leader and Manning is not one 
of them.  Hence:

-  If Lucien didn't defend the rights of the French, then who would?  As an
   opposition party, it's their jobs to question almost anything that the    
   government does.  I just wish he looked beyond the borders of Quebec when 
   he does his opposition thing.

-  If Preston Manning was the opposition party leader, would he defend the
   case of the only French military college around?  I guarantee you he
   wouldn't.

-  Now, if we had a more credible party in the opposition seat, such as
   the conservatives or the NDP, then I know that they would defend the
   French military college as they would defend the rights of all other
   Canadians beyond the borders of Quebec, after that last budget.

/Mario

799.5Defend Quebec ? Try the Prime Minister.KAOFS::D_STREETMon Feb 28 1994 19:1620
    Maio:
    
     Why does the closure of the college in Quebec become a matter of
    "defending" ? The government decided to keep one (1) college. They
    closed the one in BC (English only I presume), and the one in Quebec
    (French only I presume) and keep one centrally located between Montreal
    and Toronto. Equally accessible to both linguistic groups. If they had
    kept the one in BC, and Kingston, and dropped the one in Quebec I could
    see a problem. As it is, the government took a reasonable action, and
    tried to accomodate as best they could, considering the fiscal
    situation. In this light, Lucien's complaining seems self serving, and
    only used to stir up the "paranoia" Quebecers seem to feel. I, as a
    non-Quebecer am saying that since he only has one side to every issue,
    his input is not valid. Even if he thought the closure was good, he
    would not say it. Basically, if you know what he is going to say,
    before he says it, and it always has the same point of view, he is a
    waste of space on the hill. I already know Quebec wants it's cake and
    eat it too, I don't need a seperatist to tell me that.
    
    							Derek.
799.6Anglophone/Francophone/Telephone!POLAR::STOODLEYMon Feb 28 1994 21:5319
799.7Barnum and Bailey.POLAR::MCNALLYMon Feb 28 1994 23:508
    No room for the likes of Bouchard in any Parliamentary System.
    Only in Canada would you see a disgraceful side show such as
    the one we have with the BLOC being second in command.  At least
    the reform party doesn't want to break the country up.  Maybe when
    Lucien goes down to speak in the States he will get the message
    that what he wants is not what the Americans want.  I suspect
    his reception will be cool, to say the least.
    
799.8CTHU26::S_BURRIDGETue Mar 01 1994 11:339
    One problem of the current situation is that there is no credible
    opposition on issues affecting Quebec.  People outside Quebec are not
    inclined to give any credence to Bouchard.  Chantal Hebert's column in
    the Citizen yesterday made an interesting case against the closing of
    the St. Jean military college.  There's nobody in Parliament from
    Quebec with the credibility to make such a case.
    
    -Stephen
    
799.9CTHP12::M_MORINA dead man with the most toys is still a dead man.Tue Mar 01 1994 11:3812
799.10Inquiring minds and all that....KAOFS::D_STREETTue Mar 01 1994 11:4410
    CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE
    
    >>Chantal Hebert's column in the Citizen yesterday made an interesting
    >>case against the closing of the St. Jean military college
    
    
     Care to elaborate ?
    
    							Derek.
    
799.11CTHU26::S_BURRIDGETue Mar 01 1994 12:2020
    Basically, that it would be serious blow to bilingualism in the forces. 
    Apparently frncophone cadets were treated pretty roughly at RMC in the
    50s, before the St. Jean college was created.
    
    I also heard a commentary on the radio the other day that said the gov.
    was still being too generous to Quebec in defence spending --
    apparently the recruits who used to go to Cornwallis, now closed, will
    go to St. Jean instead, so that its population will actually increase. 
    Also, a coastal defence HQ is being built in Quebec City, a river
    port that is closed half the year by ice.  This comentator was the
    editor of "Esprit de Corps" magazine, who I believe supports Reform.
    
    A study was done under the Tories, completed last summer, that
    recommended that St. Jean and Royal Roads be kept open.  The Reform MP
    for the riding that includes Royal Roads tried to get it released
    before the budget, unsuccessfully.
    
    So there are arguments to be made against these closures, but no
    credible federalist opposition to make them, at least as regards
    Quebec.
799.12POLAR::RICHARDSONSick in balanced sort of wayTue Mar 01 1994 12:2312
    Well, I've just recently compared Lucien to a snooker player and you
    should all be glad to know that Lucien appears to be a virile athlete.
    Perhaps he should do a few laps on Meech Lake this summer to garner
    support in Quebec for separation. It could be a stroke of genius.


    Wooops! Wait a minute, I just realised I was comparing Lucien to my
    jockey photos.... Well, that explains it. Okay. Sorry folks, I have
    some more research to do. Once I find the right photos I'll let you
    know how Lucien does.

    Glenn
799.13The two "opposition" parties combined don't have a platform to stand on.KAOFS::D_STREETTue Mar 01 1994 12:379
    CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE
    
     As I suspected, a case made from 30+ year old facts.
    
     A Reform party member trying to quash a spending cut ? Didn't take
    long to get into the NIMBY syndrome did it ? Reform is as big a joke as
    the Bloc, they just have to speak up more to prove it.
    
    							Derek.
799.14CTHU26::S_BURRIDGETue Mar 01 1994 12:452
    Don't dimiss Hebert's argument on the basis of my very brief summary of
    her main point.
799.15Don't cut the Umbilical Cord (yet)!POLAR::STOODLEYTue Mar 01 1994 22:4919
799.16CTHP12::M_MORINA dead man with the most toys is still a dead man.Wed Mar 02 1994 11:5911
799.17Yea, though I walk through the valley..POLAR::ROBINSONPEVO InsideWed Mar 02 1994 13:569
    
    Of course, RMC has a valuing differences program now, so even
    if you are gay, french and of say, somalian extraction, you should
    not fear anything as you walk the streets of Kingston in your cadet
    uniform (otherwise known as the monkey suit).
    
    Suuure...
    
    Pat
799.18KAOFS::J_DESROSIERSLets procrastinate....tomorrowWed Mar 02 1994 15:308
    I think they should close ALL the military colleges and get rid of an
    expensive useless army, navy and air force.
    
    Jean
    
    PS the comments from the press say that french proportion in the armed
    forces went UP (from less than 6% to more than 20%) after Saint-Jean
    was opened.
799.19RMC CadetsPOLAR::MCNALLYWed Mar 02 1994 18:339
    I lived in kingston for some time during the 80's and yes the RMC
    Cadets do walk around in their monkey suits always in a group.
    They never have problems on the street, but they have gotten
    into trouble in some bars.  The abuse builds character.  It's
    a test to see whether they take their career seriously or not.
    Overall the armed forces and the civilian population of Kingston
    co-habitate rather well although I understand they will be
    closing CFB Kingston.  Am I correct about that one?
    
799.20KAOFS::J_DESROSIERSLets procrastinate....tomorrowThu Mar 10 1994 17:136
    The answer from one of the ministers after the closing was announced;
    "We will spend $50,000,000 to promote the use of french in Kingston to
    make the french speaking students more confortable".  And I tought we
    were going to SAVE money by closing those schools, how silly of me.
    
    Jean
799.21I admire you fiscal restraint.KAOFS::D_STREETFri Mar 11 1994 11:4812
    KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS
    
    "We will spend $50,000,000 to promote the use of french in Kingston to
        make the french speaking students more confortable"
    
     So you are saying leave Kingston alone ? Let the Francophone students
    learn a little English ? Wanna bet on the inter-governmental language
    used by NATO ? The UN ? Is it going to kill them to learn a little of a
    language that just might save their life in a combat zone ?
    
    
    							Derek.
799.22KAOFS::M_COTEI was thereFri Mar 11 1994 17:504
    
    
    	The ROC welcomes the fact that we spending tax dollars on our
    Brother in H'arms.
799.23KAOFS::J_DESROSIERSLets procrastinate....tomorrowMon Mar 14 1994 15:5616
799.24R2ME2::HINXMANIn the range of strangeMon Mar 14 1994 18:5312
	re .23

>    PS Even the United Staters don't need an army to invade us, all their
>    citicens have guns, fortunately, they can't stand the cold.

	Ahem, Jean. One of the lessons of the war of 1812 was that militias
	were inadequate for prosecuting a war. The logical consequence of
	the U.S. having a standing army should have been the repeal of the
	second amendment to their constitution (the one that talks about
	militias being important). :-)

	Tony
799.25Caught telling tales out of school.KAOFS::D_STREETTue May 31 1994 18:3711
    Well, Lucy has been up to his tricks again. He has gone to an "off the
    record" meeting, said what he felt, and when it got leaked, called it
    all lies. Saying BC would be annexed by the states, Bloc MP's would all
    resign if the referendum was lost,  obstruction in parliment if Canada
    tried to stop seperation...
    
      In his own words "Am I crazy, Am I crazy ? Do I look Crazy ?"
    
     In my own words "YES"
    
    							Derek.
799.26KAOFS::J_DESROSIERSLets procrastinate....tomorrowWed Jun 01 1994 04:057
799.27POLAR::RICHARDSONSick in balanced sort of wayWed Jun 01 1994 11:0311
    I disagree, in fact I remember a poll taken not long ago in each
    province concerning joining the United States, and Quebecers were the
    ones most for it. Seems they like the U.S. a lot. I would like to see
    such a poll taken again to see if things have changed.

    Also in the early 1970's, the U.S. Government did a study on Canada to
    determine what parts of it would be worth annexing, and the only
    province they would be interested in was British Columbia because of
    the link to Alaska and the pipelines.

    Glenn
799.28Don't let reality cloud you judgement Jean.KAOFS::D_STREETWed Jun 01 1994 12:5719
    KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS
    
    1. The word is Canadians, not quotes, with a capital letter at the front.
    2. As usuall you attribute Quebec charactoristics (love affair with the
       US) to the rest of Canada.
    3. Maybe you should not listen to your seperatist propoganda masters,
       it makes you look as deceitful as they are (or badly misinformed
       your choice)
    4. Most people respect the right of self determination, what most
       people don't respect is periodic blackmail based on that right.
    
    
    	Come on Jean, please tell us more about how the ROC thinks, feels,
    and will act in the future. I am always amazed at how clearly the
    seperatists see things (like the cake walk to sovereignty) and how the
    federalists are always confused (like international law requires Quebec
    to get permission to seperate). 
    
    							Derek.
799.29KAOFS::M_COTEI was thereWed Jun 01 1994 13:589
    

    [Start whining music here!]
    Jean is not ONE OF US! He can't understand us. You got to be one of US
    to understand what we've been going through. 

    [End Whining music here, begin Oh Canada, English Version as sung by
    the WWII vets, quickly move on to God Save the King including the
    "We kicked some butt on DE Plains didn't we?" chant in the background.]
799.30Who supports Bouchard?POLAR::MCNALLYFri Jun 24 1994 19:354
    Why is Bouchard even mentioned in this notesfile.  He is a traitor
    to Canada and himself.  I foresee a civil war not too far away if 
    the likes of Bouchard and Parizeau are allowed to stand on their
    feet with any following much longer.  
799.31KAOFS::B_VANVALKENBMon Jun 27 1994 14:2113
    Pulleeease...Civil war....
    
    This is Canada !! If Q decides to separate there will be a couple
    of years worth of negotiating to determine their share of the debt,
    and the actual land boundaries, but no one is willing to lose their
    life over it. If there was Lucy would have had a bullet thru his head.
    National unity Texas style.
    
    
    Brian V
    
    
    
799.32Let's do it.POLAR::MCNALLYMon Jun 27 1994 21:439
    Predicting civil war may be going a little too far given the fact
    we are talking about Canadians here.
    However, the part about Lucy in the sky getting a lead lobotomy
    doesn't sound so bad.
    People of Quebec...please get rid of this clown and Papa Parizeau
    as quick as you can.  We can then take care of Presto " The Magician "
    Manning.
     Sean
    
799.33Caporal Lortie tried but missed it by that muchKAOFS::J_DESROSIERSLets procrastinate....tomorrowTue Jun 28 1994 14:106
    Since all those politicians are in Ottawa (closer for you than me), you
    should go buy an uzi and do a number on them and save the country from
    both those $%?&* french kebeckers and those right wing westerners.
    
    John
    
799.34KAFS31::LACAILLEHalf-filled bottles of inspirationTue Jun 28 1994 14:523
	
	John, ya got a bee in your bonnet? Or have you been taking
	lessons from Glen(n).
799.35I (little heart) Quebec !!!KAOFS::D_STREETTue Jun 28 1994 15:1416
    Jean,
    
     If you read carefully, you will notice YOU are the only one useing the
    term "$%?&* french kebeckers". It would serve the seperatists purpose if
    we did hate french Quebecers.
    
     The sad truth (for seperatists) is that we only hate self serving
    seperatists.
    
     As a matter of interest, what part of the political spectrum does the
    BQ represent ? Left ? Right ? Center ? Interesting "political party"
    that only has one plank in it's platform.
    
     "French Quebecers above all else"
    
    							Derek.
799.36wrong agenda again jeanKAORSC::R_HARPERThis space unavailable, Digital has it nowTue Jun 28 1994 17:579
    not to make too much fun of that incident, but didn't Coporal Lortie
    used a made in Canada gun. you are suggesting the use of a
    foreign made weapon to do a strickly Canadian deed.
    
    Come on, we want to talk about economics and jobs. :-) :-)
    That will save the country. Buy Canadian, or American with an assemble
    in Canada (CSA approved) sticker.
    
    richard
799.37KAOFS::J_DESROSIERSLets procrastinate....tomorrowTue Jun 28 1994 19:1319
    No, I'm not sick, I have seen the light....english forever, god save
    the Queen (and her duly appointed representative and all the court
    jesters).  I mean it, talk to anyone in the universe and the language
    of choice IS english (ref: star trek, battlestar galactica, star
    wars...) from now on I will never enter another note in a language
    other than the one understood by the whole universe.
    
    John (see I have even translated my name just to prove how sincere I
    am)
    
    Re Richard, I am sorry I even mentionned a foreign weapon, but
    machine-gun was too long to spell.  I am sure a true patriot and a
    proud Canadian would never THINK of using a non-union non-Canadian
    rifle or bullets, it just wouldn't be right.
    
    I have even started a campaign to stop any further digging of the grand
    canal on Quebec (see no accent on the "e") soil since we are not deserving
    of such a grand scheme.
    
799.38POLAR::RICHARDSONSick in balanced sort of wayTue Jun 28 1994 20:1712
    Dear Jean,

    	I am grievously vexed to learn of the prevailing attitudes to the
    Grand Canal. I thought by now people would begin to understand the
    great benefit of the Grand Canal and how it has been the glue that has
    held us all together.

    I think I'm going to cry...

    <snif>

    Glenn
799.39CSC32::S_BROOKThere and back to see how far it isWed Jun 29 1994 00:169
Jean,

Names are not, never, no way translated if at all possible.  And it is still
not pronounced like the blue denim trousers either.  Your name is or should
be sacrosanct.  No one, should ever translate your name.

Your parents called you Jean. They did not call you John, nor Gene.

Stuart (not Stu or Stew or Stewart)
799.40POLAR::RICHARDSONSick in balanced sort of wayWed Jun 29 1994 15:323
    Aw come on Stu, stop pulling Johnny Baby's leg!
    
    ;-)