| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 180.1 | Consult the managaement please. | KAOM25::TOMKINS | This MIND left blank INTENTIONALLY | Tue May 16 1989 15:14 | 1 |
| You should consult your freindly systems mangler on this one. :-)
|
| 180.2 | Thanks... | TROA02::DZIALOWSKI | | Wed May 17 1989 02:01 | 1 |
| I was asking for a realistic suggestion...
|
| 180.3 | | TRCO01::FINNEY | Keep cool, but do not freeze ... | Wed May 17 1989 12:43 | 3 |
| realistically, nope. Haven't been able to do it.
Scooter
|
| 180.4 | Please God give us 2400 bps dialup!! | TROA01::MSCHNEIDER | What me worry? | Thu May 18 1989 04:07 | 13 |
| It really is great to have this SCHOLAR Plus modem sitting here
on my desktop capable of 2400 baud service ..... now if only we
could get dial-in access at 2400 baud. Quite honestly we must be
the last place in the world that doesn't offer dialup service at
speeds greater than 1200 baud. Heck, some PC bulletin board systems
offer 9600 baud dialup service! I used 2400 baud dialup at a local
university with little or no data errors, so reliability of service
is no excuse for not moving with the times.
Anything that would help repaint my screen a little faster would
be appreciated. MIS/Telecomm are you listening?
Martin
|
| 180.5 | this is not the way to solve this | FSCORE::RODERMOND | | Thu May 18 1989 13:00 | 9 |
| There seems to be no point in complaining about this issue in this conference.
It certainly is not a global issue, as various organizations within DEC canada
have 2400 dial-up access to their systems. So if you don't have it and really
need it, why not talk to your cost-centre manager? You need to follow
established procedures.
If you want action, you ain't gonna get it here is my bet.
fred
|
| 180.6 | 2400 future release? | TROA02::DZIALOWSKI | | Thu May 18 1989 21:32 | 3 |
| The paper from MIS supplied with the phone # and access code mentionned
access at 1200 or 2400. Are we doing something wrong or is 2400
for future release ?
|
| 180.7 | | TRCO01::FINNEY | Keep cool, but do not freeze ... | Tue May 23 1989 18:12 | 9 |
| re: .6 (Dialupowski)
hmmm, now that you mention it, I do recall seeing the 2400 baud
reference on the sheet from MIS.
If God had meant us to have 2400 baud ... He wouldn't have given
Scholars 2400/1200 fallback ...
Scooter_who's_trying_to_get_his_DS3100_registered_on_Enet.
|