[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference irnbru::ims_api

Title:
Moderator:IRNBRU::MACKENZIE
Created:Wed Jul 10 1991
Last Modified:Tue May 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:289
Total number of notes:1527

288.0. "IMS-E-NOREQUEST error?" by IRNBRU::JWESTERMAN (Jeremy Westerman, MSG+ Middleware, Ayr.) Wed Apr 16 1997 14:11

Tultex came across the following.

Does this mean that the request handle being used to read from sl_get_req_elt
does not exist, ie he hasn't done a sl_read_req?

Jeremy.

From:	VBORMC::"jlarson@hemisphere.neocomm.net" "Jay Larson"  8-APR-1997 15:06:26.48
To:	Jeremy Westerman <jwesterman@irnbru.enet.dec.com>
CC:	
Subj:	DMQ log message & IMS message

Jeremy,

Hope you had a good trip/flight back home. Here is the DMQ log 
message I told you about. Also, we came accross a bogus IMS 
message that needs some clarification.

DMQ Log Message:
************ dmqld (3446) 26-MAR-1997 08:43:59 ************
ipi, semaphore operation failed

************ dmqld (3446) 26-MAR-1997 08:43:59 ************
ld, initialization failure

************ dmqld (3446) 26-MAR-1997 08:43:59 ************
spi, not attached to object

************ dmqld (3446) 26-MAR-1997 08:43:59 ************
ld, caught signal 11

************ dmqld (3446) 26-MAR-1997 08:43:59 ************
ld, link receiver for group 30 from group 38 is exiting

IMS Message:
sl_get_req_elt() failure: 136020018 -
%IMS-E-NOREQUEST, the requested passed was not found

Thanks,

Jay Larson
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
288.1is .0 One or Two problems?BEAVER::MCKEATINGWed Apr 16 1997 15:4018
Focusing on the MSG+ part of .0 we see:-

IMS Message:
sl_get_req_elt() failure: 136020018 -
%IMS-E-NOREQUEST, the requested passed was not found

This means that the handle passed to the sl_get_req_elt call is not 
valid.

This is most likely as a result of bad program logic. Most common
causes are:-

1.not called sl_read_req yet so there is no handle in the variable.
2.sl_finish_req already called so request has been cleared.
3.handles passed to subroutines incorrectly see 287.0

hope this helps,
Bob