| Title: | DIGITAL UNIX (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DEC OSF/1) |
| Notice: | Welcome to the Digital UNIX Conference |
| Moderator: | SMURF::DENHAM |
| Created: | Thu Mar 16 1995 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 10068 |
| Total number of notes: | 35879 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 894.1 | Broken program | QUARRY::neth | Craig Neth | Fri May 19 1995 18:39 | 35 |
| 894.2 | Looks like a bug in default cc to me | WIBBIN::NOYCE | The brakes still work on this bus | Mon May 22 1995 15:15 | 5 |
| 894.3 | QUARRY::neth | Craig Neth | Mon May 22 1995 17:07 | 16 | |
| 894.4 | Why does it matter? | STEVMS::PETTENGILL | mulp | Tue May 23 1995 01:59 | 4 |
| 894.5 | QUARRY::metsky | Shipwrecked and comatose | Tue May 23 1995 13:28 | 6 | |
| 894.6 | I can't say I like it | CXXC::REINIG | This too shall change | Tue May 23 1995 16:15 | 28 |
| 894.7 | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Tue May 23 1995 17:16 | 14 | |
| 894.8 | Not that simple, alas. | QUARRY::reeves | Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group | Wed May 24 1995 15:25 | 81 |
| 894.9 | Can the operand of ++ really be evaluated several times? | WIBBIN::NOYCE | The brakes still work on this bus | Wed May 24 1995 15:43 | 13 |
| 894.10 | I don't use ++ | CXXC::REINIG | This too shall change | Wed May 24 1995 16:47 | 65 |
| 894.11 | A simpler example | CXXC::REINIG | This too shall change | Wed May 24 1995 16:59 | 7 |
| 894.12 | interesting legalese, but what is the more intuitive result? | GEMGRP::ALBERT | Thu Jun 15 1995 20:28 | 26 |