[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hydra::dejavu

Title:Psychic Phenomena
Notice:Please read note 1.0-1.* before writing
Moderator:JARETH::PAINTER
Created:Wed Jan 22 1986
Last Modified:Tue May 27 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2143
Total number of notes:41773

784.0. "electricity" by DANUBE::C_JALBERT () Thu Jun 30 1988 19:38

    First, if there is a note that alreay addresses this, perhaps you
    could point me to it.
    
    I am mostly a reader, but a couple of time I have entered notes.
    
    What I would like to know is, is there any significance in a
    bodies attraction (or rather electricities attaction to a body??
    
    We went to the Museum of Science yesterday, and in looking at all
    the exhibits, my children were especially fascinated by the electricity
    room. There is, in this room, a large glass type ball, with what
    looks like lightening surging thru it.  The instructions say to
    put your hand on the class ball and watch the electricity come
    to you.  Well, we all did, and it was fun to watch, but when my
    youngest, Kristina (I have written about her before) put her hand
    on it, the main shaft of electricity immediately went to her, plus
    she "stole" almost all the electricity from others who had their
    hands on the glass ball.  It was coming at her hand from all over
    It was really "neat" to watch.  Several of us did it, but it did
    not look anything like what happened when she would put her hand
    on it.
    
    Is there any significane, or is she just someone who is loaded
    with electricity??
    
    Carla Jalbert
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
784.1capacitance was involved, I presumeINK::KALLISDon't confuse `want' and `need.'Thu Jun 30 1988 19:487
    Re .0 (Carla):
    
    Insufficient data.  Could've been that she had more conductive shoes
    on than others (or was moister, or both), this making something
    like a closer ground connection.              
    
    Steve Kallis, Jr.
784.2Either C or R, or both.MIDEVL::YERAZUNISCaution: Contains subliminal suggestionsThu Jun 30 1988 21:046
    Moister, sweatier, cleaner skin, more conductive (or more capacitive
    because thinner) footwear, etc.
    
    No great mystery here... yet.
    
    	-Bill
784.3thanksDANUBE::C_JALBERTThu Jun 30 1988 23:3117
    Thanks for the info/input... I don't think she was any sweatier,
    or moister than anyone else there?? don't know, I can say her hands
    were ice cold (it was a cool day, and the museum was cool) BUT,
    it had been raining when we entered, however we were at the RAMSES
    exhibit about an hour or so before we went to look at other exhibits.
    
    Her shoes, she had on a pair of "suede-type" flats with "plastic-
    type" heels and "alleged leather look" soles.
    
    Mystery or not, it was most interesting to watch ... it was almost
    beautiful (the designs the electricity made) in a rather bizarre
    fashion.
    
    Thanks again...
    
    Carla
    
784.4The Eye of the StormHPSCAD::DDOUCETTEThe WP is mighter than the GunFri Jul 01 1988 13:1013
In case anyone is interested, they sell a smaller version of the glass ball
under the name "eye of the storm" for around $150-$200.  It's usually
available in electronic novelty stores and catalogs, as well as the Museum
of Science gift shop!  They're great, and it doesn't seem to matter what type 
of shoe you wear to have those effects.

As to how it works. . .  Don't forget we're bioelectric, I've touched
the sphere with a coin at the tip of my finger for a "strong reaction," 
but I HAVEN'T tried to touch one of those with a battery, loop of wire,
superconductor, etc.  

They can be a lot of fun to experiment with, for childern and adults alike.
784.5Doesn't mean much.PBSVAX::COOPERTopher CooperFri Jul 01 1988 14:4622
    I've seen them for as low as $110, and suspect if you wait for an
    sale you might get them for a lot less.
    
    They work by a form of high-frequency electric discharge into a
    mixture of low pressure gases.  The result is very complex interation
    of forces which is likely to be rather sensitive to very small
    external influences.  I dobut if the bodies intrinsic electric
    field has much of an influence though.  It is so much smaller
    than induced fields from static charges picked up by friction
    and your body acting as an "antenna" picking up ambiant radio
    frequencies and 60Hz signals.  The amount of sweat in the
    skin needed to modify these effect is very small, and it is not
    clear whether more or less is "better" (it probably varies up
    and down and depends on the other factors in addition).  A person's
    exact size, the shape of their fingers, when the last cut their
    fingernails, and much else are all likely to have an unpredictable
    effect on these plasma-discharge spheres.
    
    So, no significance can be attached to differences for different
    people, but they *are* fun.
    
    					Topher
784.6Look and look some more.WRO8A::GUEST_TMPGoing HOME--as an AdventurerSat Jul 02 1988 02:559
    re: last couple
    
         I just paid a visit to the Price Club today and they happened
    to have one of these eye-of-the-storm type balls...I didn't look
    very closely at it to see more but I did notice the price at, I
    believe, $79.
    
    Frederick
    
784.7Who was standing where?CIMNET::PIERSONon vacation 23/7-6/9Fri Jul 08 1988 23:0013
    A conventional possibility.  If the display is the one I am thinking
    of, it is noticably elongated, perhaps 3 ft by 1ft?  IF Kristina
    was standing nearest one end, she would tend to draw the discharge
    preferentially from that end.  Also, if she was the shortest present
    her impedance (used in its technical sense) to ground could well
    have been less than for an adult/older child.
    
    If memory serves, the discharge appears to "orignate" from one end,
    leaving the other end dark if the discharge is "detoured" to a side
    wall.  It is a fascinating, and beautiful display.
    
    thanks
    dave pierson
784.8Strange lightningUSAT05::KASPERLife is like a beanstalk, isn't it...Fri Jul 29 1988 01:4111
I have a question and I guess this is an okay place to put it.  

I heard something interesting on the radio today and would like to solicit an
explanation from some of you electric types.

Somewhere in California some children in an open area were struck by 
lightning, none fatally but serious enough.  The strange part is that it 
was (according to witnesses and the ABC radio story) a bolt of lightning - 
but there was no rain and *no* clouds.  How can that be???

Terry
784.9possibleMARKER::KALLISAnger's no replacement for reasonFri Jul 29 1988 11:5612
    Re .8 (Terry):
    
    That's unusual, but not impossible.  If somehow a static electric
    difference built up sufficient so that a lightning bolt [which is
    a great big spark] could bridge the gap, that would explain it.
    It might also be that if the air was sufficiently hazy, a
    lighter-colored cloud might not have been visible.
    
    In short, data too scanty to form a definite opinion, but it's not
    out of the question.
    
    Steve Kallis, Jr.
784.10More possabilitiesPBSVAX::COOPERTopher CooperFri Jul 29 1988 14:5217
RE: .8 (Terry) supplementing .9 (Steve)
    
    Although it is *very* rare and not well understood occasionally
    lighting move horizontally for dozens of miles (from a storm over
    the horizon) before striking the Earth.  I'm not sure how well
    established this phenomena is, but I do know that it is taken seriously
    by at least some people who study lightning.
    
    There are also theories -- and these are definitely *not* well
    accepted, but are not outright rejected either -- which claim that
    quite large electric charges can build up occasionally in earth
    faults by piezoelectric action.  Conceivably this could have been
    such a discharge.  I doubt if anyone close to where a lightning
    bolt struck would be able to see much more than a flash of light,
    i.e., they wouldn't have any idea of the direction it came from.
    
    					Topher
784.11as I said, too many variablesMARKER::KALLISAnger's no replacement for reasonFri Jul 29 1988 15:0114
    Re .10 (Topher):
    
    >......................I doubt if anyone close to where a lightning
    >bolt struck would be able to see much more than a flash of light,
    >i.e., they wouldn't have any idea of the direction it came from.
                       
    Actually, it's worse than _that_.  Most people are unaware that
    the initial current surge in a lightning bolt is up, not down. 
    And that further, once the ionized path is established, there's
    an oscillating current as the initial flow of electrons overshoots
    straight balance (a quickly damped oscillation to be sure, but an
    oscillation nonetheless).
    
    Steve Kallis, Jr.
784.12Who you gonna call???USAT05::KASPERLife is like a beanstalk, isn't it...Fri Jul 29 1988 15:146
Thanks!  I knew I could count on the 'Kallis-Cooper' ghostbuster squad to 
help me out.  No stone is left unturned...

Much appreciated.

Terry
784.13Lightning strikes twiceUSAT05::KASPERYou'll see it when you believe it.Fri Aug 19 1988 19:2611
re: .8 (me)

	In .8 I mentioned some kids struck by lightning without any
	clouds around.  Well, while on vacation in Florida last week
	I heard about two guys walking down the beach - the same thing
	happened to them.  The bolt struck one then passed along to the
	other.  No clouds in sight???  For a rare event, that's twice
	in the course of a couple weeks.  (One was left in critical
	condition, the other experienced minor injuries).

	Terry