[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::sports_90

Title:OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid
Notice:Please review note 1.83 before writing anything.
Moderator:VAXWRK::NEEDLE
Created:Thu Dec 14 1989
Last Modified:Fri Dec 17 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:438
Total number of notes:50420

44.0. "The "RAIDERS"" by COMET::MONTGOMERY (Uno Mas Loss Donks) Fri Dec 15 1989 15:50

This note is for "Americas Team "

come over to the Dark Side!!!!! ;^))))))))))))


Monty

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
44.1COMET::MONTGOMERYUno Mas Loss DonksFri Dec 15 1989 15:537
This Sunday nights game should be a great one... Both teams play each other
well and this is a must win for the RAIDERS!!!!
It's on ESPN so all you East coast folk's can watch a real team play football!!
Remember to wear your Silver & Black on Sunday!!!!

Monty

44.2Bo know's FootballSALEM::HERSEYFri Dec 15 1989 17:299
    
    You got it Monty, not a bad year for seeing the RAIDERS on TV. I'm
    from New England and now work in Delaware. I've been a RAIDERS fan
    my whole life. I never wrote in the old conference, figured I'd
    get in fresh here. I've seen better than half the games this year
    on TV, lucky year. Well you can bet I'll be wearing my Silver &
    Black Sunday night, GO RAIDERS!!!!!!!!!!!1
    
    Todd
44.3Princess ComeonIwannalayyaGENRAL::WADESheblewmynoseandthensheblewmymind!Fri Dec 15 1989 18:527
    The dark side huh..............
    
    Imagine a Darth Vaderesque voice:  Monty, you hoser, I'm your Dad!
    
    :^)
    
    Clay
44.4Take Off You HoserQUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceFri Dec 15 1989 19:144
    Yea,  so like, all the bowling alleys were closed so I spent most
    of my time looking for beer
    
    Big Game
44.5NY GIANTS know football too !!!WR2FOR::DIAS_MIFri Dec 15 1989 21:212
 All you Raider addicts beware, the NY Giants will stuff y'all for
    XMAS eve ham !!!   HA... HA...    
44.6;')LUDWIG::JAMESFri Dec 15 1989 21:385
    I have had a silver car for years, I just purchased a black one.
    Until I saw them parked together in the driveway, it didn't dawn
    on me, I must be a closet Raiders fan.
    
                                  Steve J.
44.7SNDCSL::HAUSRATHWho,Stones in '89. Zep in '90Mon Dec 18 1989 11:386
    
    Looks like the Raiders season ended last night..  
    
    Where's the Giants game being played next week?  
    
    
44.8re: .7LEVERS::STROUTa pound of obscureMon Dec 18 1989 11:402
    It's L.A. Radiers at NY GIANTS.  Giants are favored by 7 on the
    opening line.
44.9OURGNG::J_WARDLEMember: Namath_JihadMon Dec 18 1989 11:473
    Are the Raiders elimnated now?
    
    JoJ
44.10yLEVERS::STROUTa pound of obscureMon Dec 18 1989 11:514
    not yet.  don't even ask me what has to happen for them to enter,
    but i have to think that at 8-7 they atleast have a better chance
    than seattle (7-8) who is also still in the race going into the
    last game.
44.11GENRAL::WADESheblewmynoseandthensheblewmymind!Mon Dec 18 1989 12:023
    If they win @ the Giants next week, they're in.
    
    Claybone
44.13GENRAL::WADESheblewmynoseandthensheblewmymind!Mon Dec 18 1989 17:517
    Hey, where's Hooter at?  I figured he'd be in here complaining
    about the Donk refs working their game.  IMHO, Bo scored!
    Since the sports math note didn't make it over, here's one:
    
    		Rory Graves = Gerald Perry
    
    Claybone
44.14COMET::JACKSONTAGo D!!!!Tue Dec 19 1989 12:391
      The Raiders will be home for the holidays!!!!
44.15SALEM::HERSEYTue Dec 19 1989 13:377
    
    Raiders in the playoffs? Only if they win Sunday and the Colts and
    the Browns lose. So Saturday night the Oilers play the Browns in
    the house of dames, this is the only time I'll cheer for the Oilers.
    Lets hope theres still something to cheer for on Sunday.
    
    Todd
44.16CSC32::SALZERTue Dec 19 1989 16:149
    Seems like those 2 or three players Al needs to turn it
    around are a left tackle, a qb and a 16 game season superstar
    back. With the annual pre-arrival hype of Bo starting, has he
    ever really had a big impact?  He has had some big plays but
    many players have had big plays too.  The 2 or three times I've
    seen him this season, he seemed to have  been only a cut above average.  
    Please refresh my memory.
    
    BoB
44.17The Raiders are mailing in the final gameOURBOX::LAZARUSDave Lazarus NYA DSS 321-5183Tue Dec 19 1989 18:334
    The Raider's season ended on Sunday in Seattle. They will mail in
    the final game in frigid Giants Stadium,losing 26-7. Bo can't wiat
    for Spring Training.BTW,if KC's off season acquisiitons put them
    over the top,Bo will be gone for even more games next year.
44.18JULIET::MAY_BRIt ain't the size its how you use itTue Dec 19 1989 19:075
    
    I don't think last night's game helped the Raiders any, either.
    The Giants now have a lot more to play for.
    
    Bruce 
44.19What a thought!!7R7NET::LOGANWed Dec 20 1989 15:1014
    
    Raiders in the playoffs???
    
    Now thats a new twist.
    
    They weren't eliminated Sunday night,  they've technically
    been eliminated since 1984.  Maybe they'll be the team of the
    '90s.
    
    Too bad Harden isn't enjoying this year with the Broncos.  He is the
    only Silver&Black member I feel sorry for.
    
    
    Russ
44.20Maybe next yearCOMET::JACKSONTAGo D!!!!Wed Dec 20 1989 16:278
       I agree with ya Russ.  I still say Harden is better than Henderson. 
    Of course Henderson hasn't had the experience Harden does,  but Harden
    puts on a bigger hit...ask Largent.
    
      Bo will call football quits...He can't play both games tooooo long.
    
    
    		Tj
44.21GENRAL::GIBSONWed Dec 20 1989 18:4420
    
    Harden? Oh brother! He is THE weak link in their defense. He doesn't
    fill on running plays and is usually late arriving to the ball on
    passing plays. The only reason he is playing is due to the unbelievable
    number of injuries the RAIDERS have had at the safety position this
    year. Vann McElroy got some playing time last week and played well.
    Unfortunately, Eddie Anderson was injured (I don't know his status) so
    Harden will probably start again this week.
    
    BTW, Harden and Henderson play different positions. Denver was forced
    to play Harden out of position at CB a few times due to lack of talent
    at that position and/or injuries but Harden is a safety, Henderson a
    CB.
    
    I expect Bo to quit football after next season. He is up for a new
    contract with KC and will use football as a bargaining tool. KC will
    give him a whole herd of zeros on his new contract.
    
                                                    HOOT
    
44.23POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Dec 20 1989 19:084
    ANYWAYS, WHO'S THE raiders PLAYING IN THE SUPER BOWL THIS TIME? :*)
    
    COWBOY
    
44.24GENRAL::GIBSONWed Dec 20 1989 19:1210
    
    You are right, Steven. The front seven and the good man-to-man job done
    by the corners covers up for Harden. It's kind of hard to call McElroy
    their best DB since he has been injured most of the year. He is their
    best safety but Eddie Anderson would have to be called their best
    safety this year. Terry McDaniel is their best corner/cover man.
    Barring injury, he is going to be a star.
    
                                                    HOOT
    
44.25CNTROL::CHILDSNoregia 2 Bush Zip, Nada...Thu Dec 21 1989 10:155
    
    I agree with ya Hoot about McDaniel, he is the one player on the team
    that I would love to trade for.
    
    mike
44.26RAIDERS=AFC TEAM OF THE 80'sELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Dec 21 1989 12:256
    RAIDERS are gonna kill the Giants, 24-7.
         
    Carlos.
    
    Ok ...Ok, so maybe I am a little overzealous, but they are gonna
    win.                  
44.27COBRA::DINSMOREMcfall=francessa , true sport wizardsThu Dec 21 1989 12:493
    
    keep dreaming
    
44.29GENRAL::GIBSONThu Dec 21 1989 14:0717
    
    But Steven, what about those nasty chilly breezes blowing in from the
    Pacific? 
    
    
    I'll be rooting for the RAIDERS but, I hate to say it, I doubt if they
    can win this one. If they were home or the temp. was above freezing
    they can beat the Giants. They have only had one game this year where
    they were never in it, @Houston. Hopefully, this won't be the second.
    Alot will depend on Saturday night. If Houston beats the Browns, that
    could fire up the RAIDERS knowing that a win very well could put them
    in the playoffs since Indy will, more than likely, lose in New Orleans.
    If Cleveland wins on Sat. I think they will just want to get it over
    with and get home, knowing they have no chance at the playoffs.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.307R7NET::LOGANThu Dec 21 1989 14:158
    
    Maybe next year for the Raiders!!!
    
    But I seriously doubt it!!
    
    Go Broncs!!  Take State!!
    
    Russ
44.31JULIET::MAY_BRIt's a Jingle out thereThu Dec 21 1989 14:237
    
    I don't think this will be a rout, but the Giants should control
    the game.  With the weather predicted for gameday, I expect the
    Giants to go into their ball control gameplan, much like the Dallas
    game.
    
    Bruce
44.32What a sorry team !QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceThu Dec 21 1989 17:0728
    News Flash ..........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
     Many Raider players seen packing thier bags at Raider Central
    today.  
    
      
    
      After an interview with "Uncle "AL" Davis" in which he
    was quoted as saying....  "We have absolutly no chance at the 
    playoffs this year".  "We are the sorryest excues for a Pro ball
    club I've seen in all my years in football".  "Even if we luck
    out and back into the playoffs we'll get our asses handed to us
    in the first game".  "Thats the reason I've instructed our players
    to clean out their lockers of everything except what they'll need
    for this weekends disaster and start making plans for the off 
    season".  "Even Hoot Gibson's rabbid backing of this sorry ball club
    won't be enough to get us as much as one more victory this season".
    
     After the interview, Uncle "AL" Davis was seen on wall street 
    selling shares of Raider stock for 25 cents on the dollar.  One
    would think this might be a sign of things to come for the lowly
    Raiders and their fans...
    
    
    Film At 11:00
    
    
    Big Game
44.33LEVERS::STROUTa pound of obscureThu Dec 21 1989 17:161
    hahahahhahahahhhhahahhhhahahahaaahaah!!!!
44.34OURGNG::RIGGENThu Dec 21 1989 17:309
    Howie Long must be using Brain Bozworths marketing concepts. The Guy
    plays 2 games like a man possesed all season and that earns him a
    Pro-Bowl berth ???
    
    I agree that if Howie played the whole season like he did vs. Denver
    and Seattle he would without a doubt be a Pro-Bowl starter. This guy
    has only started 4 games this season. 
    
    Jeff  
44.35EXIT26::CREWSWhat we have here is failure to communicateThu Dec 21 1989 17:465
    Re. .32 ... a note like this just proves the point that Cactus Jack is
    one of the greatest noters ever to enter this conference! His very
    astute and critical analysis is beyond question ...
    
    -- JB
44.36GENRAL::GIBSONThu Dec 21 1989 18:2612
    
    Jeff,
    Quick, delete .34 before too many people see it because the only thing
    truthful in it is that Long played great against Denver and Seattle.
    Where did you come up with the "he only started 4 games" line? That's a
    good one! How many games have you seen him play? My guess is 2, Denver
    and Seattle. Bill Walsh, "After a couple of off years and injuries
    which Long took alot of heat from the media, Howie Long has reinstated
    himself as the best defensive lineman in the NFL today."
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.37Raiders, team of the past, not the futureCOMET::JACKSONTAGo D!!!!Thu Dec 21 1989 18:479
      Best defensive lineman???  I'm confused on that!!!  I say Millard of
    the Vikes is the best!!  18 or 19 sacks!!  How many does Howie (I
    lucked out for pro bowl this year) have???  4 or 5 maybe??  He did have
    2 good games.  Is he the only faider to make it??  Gee Bo didn't make
    it though...I guess Bo knows no pro bowl!!
    
      The Jints should do it this weekend.
    
    		Tj
44.38But Long's better than anything the Donkeys haveCNTROL::CHILDSNoregia 2 Bush Zip, Nada...Thu Dec 21 1989 18:506
    
    Timmy and Hoot, Bill Walsh covers the AFC so he must hype the players
    of the girly-mon conference. Millard isn't even the best lineman on his
    team, Doleman is.
    
    mike
44.39GENRAL::WADEGive Panama a U.S. Zip Code!Thu Dec 21 1989 19:025
    Howie is better than any linemen the jints have too.  IMHO,
    Michael Dean Perry is the best DL this year.  That's right
    brown(stain) fans!  I really said it.
    
    Claybone
44.40QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceThu Dec 21 1989 19:213
    Howies washed up.............  ;^)
    
    Big Game
44.41BSS::RIGGENSteamboat 104inches newThu Dec 21 1989 19:2318
    Hoot,
    Denver played the Raiders in the 3rd game this year Howie was
    injured before that game so he might have started the season 
    opener that's 1 game
    
    Howie came back from his injury week 10 as a FULL TIME STARTER. 
    
    
    This means I was completely wrong he Started 6 games before the
    Pro-bowl ballot.
    
    Quite a marketing job for Howie..
    
    Don't get me wrong I feel that Howie is playing the best he has in
    years but a 6 game mid-season rest doesn't make my pro bowl list.
    This stuff is starting to look like the NBA All Star games with Kareem. 
    
    Jeff 
44.42GENRAL::GIBSONThu Dec 21 1989 20:0515
    
    You are wrong, Jeff. Howie only missed three games. Off hand, I don't
    know how many sacks he has. But he is not their "sack man", Greg
    Townsend is. If sacks are the main criteria, why isn't he there? He
    lead the AFC last year, 2nd in the league, and is near the top again.
    Howie does much more, like collapsing the whole side of the line. I
    have seen most of their games this year and Howie has had an
    outstanding season. Anyone that claims that he has had only two good
    games doesn't have the slightest idea of what they are talking about.
    The only games he did not start were @Denver, Seattle, @Jets and KC.
    He played most of the KC game and has started every game since. Your
    claim that he "came back from his injury week 10 as a FULL TIME
    STARTER" is absolutely, irrefutably, inequitably not true.
    
                                                    HOOT
44.43BSS::RIGGENSteamboat 104inches newThu Dec 21 1989 20:367
    Okay Hoot He came back week 10 as a man on a mission (my contract is up
    and I need more money than Haynes is paying me now). 
    
    If sacks were a measuremnt of Pro-bowl Bruce Smith wouldn't be a
    starter.
    
    Jeff 
44.44CSC32::SALZERThu Dec 21 1989 21:4430
    Santa:  Well tell me Al, what is it you want for Christmas?
    Al:     Believe me Santa, what I want you cant give me.
    Santa:  Ho Ho Ho! Don't be such a grouch little Al. Things 
            can't be that bad.
    Al:     Sure! Easy for you to say. Here we are on the verge of
            sports greatness througout time and I can't even buy
            a winning record let alone a playoff spot. 
    Santa:  Have you thought about a new coach maybe? I could provide that.
    Al:     No, I've tried that coaching revolving door trick. You 
            just end up footing the salaries of too many incompitants.
    Santa:  How about a change of cities?  A new location could maybe
            start to turn things around?
    Al:     No.  The public is starting to wise up to me on that one. 
            I've been schemeing so long on that ploy that even I don't
            believe it any more.
    Santa:  How about some draft picks?  
    Al:     Well now your talkin big guy.  What can you offer?
    Santa:  What do you need?
    Al:     I need 10.
    Santa:  10 what?
    Al:     10 Billion dollars to buy the first 10 picks in the first
            round for the next 10 years.  That'll get us back on track.
    Santa:  I'm not into giving large summs of money.
    Al:     See you later fat man and don't give me any of that 'happy
            new year' stuff either.  This new year is shaping up to be any
            better than the last 5 or 6. Hey! That's right. It's the tooth
            fairy that carries all the cash!  You have here number
            Santa?
    
    BoB
44.45re-1 Was that supposed to be humorous?CNTROL::CHILDSMerry Christmas EveryoneFri Dec 22 1989 10:151
    
44.46QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceFri Dec 22 1989 12:316
    Re;-.1
    
     I found it so.......  I think thats probably a pretty close 
    description of how Al would sound on Santa's lap. 
    
    Big Game
44.47GENRAL::GIBSONFri Dec 22 1989 13:5813
    
    Beat me to it, Mike. 
    
    
    Wrong again, Jeff. (This is getting to sound like a broken record.
    Kind of like Reeves whining every year about why half of his team
    wasn't chosen for the Pro Bowl)
     
    Howie is not up for a new contract. He signed a large one before last
    year that should be his last. There are three or 4 more years on it.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.49Go Black.USRCV1::COLOTTIRYou can't milk a BULL!Fri Dec 22 1989 14:3719
    What the Raiders need is a quality QB. They can play tough defense,
    and with just a little threat of a passing game Bo, Marcus and Steve
    Smith would probably be near the top in rushing. Everyone in the
    league knows that the vaunted Raider passing game now inhales.
    With Willie Gault, Swervin' Mervyn Fernandez, and nexted year Tim
    Brown, and TE Dave Dyal, the Raiders have a receiving corp that
    can match up with any in the league. Now if only they good get the
    ball to them... So I think Al is asking Santa for the right trade
    to come around. Maybe Frank (3-0 this year) Reich will become available
    from Buffalo. Maybe Chris Miller from Atlanta. Everyone has a price.
    Maybe Al can find the right circumstances and pull off a biggie.
    Also, I think the best thing for the Raiders would be to get back
    to Oakland. No more LA beaches or parties. Back to Raider-type,
    blue-collar, rough and rowdy Art Shell-era type football. The Raiders
    have one of best histories in the NFL so maybe in 2-3 yrs. they
    can get back to where they belong. 
    			Raider_Rich
    
    
44.50GENRAL::GIBSONFri Dec 22 1989 14:569
    
    Minor correction: it's Mike Dyal.
    
    
    Rats! .48 was set hidden before I got to see it. It's a safe bet that
    it was a rude/crude donk fan blowing steam. Could you send it to me?
    
                                                    HOOT
    
44.51A kinder and gentler version QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceFri Dec 22 1989 15:2611
    Hoot,  the Raiders sip lightly  They will be home for the 
    holidays...   Merry Christmas
    
    
    Big Game
    
    P.s. Howies washed up.  the only reason he has made it this
        long is because his wife cut him off years ago.  I heard 
    him and Dexter Manly were seen outside the whithouse selling 
    matches.....
    
44.52Redskins have some extra QBsSTRATA::JAMESFri Dec 22 1989 17:578
    re Needing a QB.
    
    Doug Williams will probably be on the unprotected list after this
    season. Two years ago, the Raiders were offering a second round
    pick for him, now they could get him for nothing. I'm sure Jay
    would love to have Doug as a teamate again. :")
    
                                 Steve J.
44.53GENRAL::GIBSONFri Dec 22 1989 18:044
    
    Close. Actually the RAIDERS game Williams a tryout when he was out of
    football, post-USFL. They didn't pick him up and the Skins did.
    Williams is history unless someone wants a back-up.
44.54they were going to tradeLUDWIG::JAMESFri Dec 22 1989 19:4811
    No Hoot,
       I have it exactly right. Before the 1987 season it looked like
    Williams was going to go to L.A. Joe Gibbs even called him and said,
    "It looks like you will be going to L.A." Gibbs called him back
    later that day and said, "We can't do it. They only offered a second
    round pick, we wanted a first." (these ate as near to the quotes
    as I could get from memory. 
       Every time I watch the tape of SB XXII they mention the above
    events.
    
                                Steve J.
44.55COMET::JACKSONTAGo D!!!!Tue Dec 26 1989 12:103
      Maybe next year..HHHHHHAAAAA   HHHHHAAAAA!!!!!!
    
    		Tj
44.567R7NET::LOGANTue Dec 26 1989 13:085
    
    BUT I DOUBT IT!!!!!
    
    
    Russ
44.57Peace and quite for once!COMET::JACKSONTAGo D!!!!Tue Dec 26 1989 15:384
      Wheres all the faider faithfuls????  Sure is quite in here.  Let me
    guess,  they must all be on vacation huh??
    
      Tj
44.58Refs, weather, injuries, holiday blues...WFOV12::MORRISONBo knows humiliationTue Dec 26 1989 15:509
    
    Tj,
       In their defense, all the other notes files seem awfully
    quite. Maybe alot of them do have today off. Let's give 'em
    until tomorrow. Besides, they need the extra time to come
    up with respectable excuses :^>
    
    Bull
    
44.60JULIET::MAY_BRIt's a Jingle out thereTue Dec 26 1989 16:066
    
    The Raiders need to learn to win the easy games on the road if they
    are to do anything.  
    
    
    Bruce
44.61CSC32::SALZERWed Dec 27 1989 17:109
    The signs were there this season. The AFC West as a whole showed 
    improvement except for Seattle maybe.  The Chiefs, Broncos and
    SD showed  turnaround. The Raiders did also but firing a coach in
    mid-season does little for the current run. Their record next season
    could improve but they must keep pace with the rest of the
    division to do that. At one time they could take that for granted.
    They cant take anything for granted any longer.
    
    BoB 
44.62Go Niners.USRCV1::COLOTTIRYou can't milk a BULL!Wed Dec 27 1989 18:347
    I'm shocked. No Donk fans drilling the Raiders into the ground.
    To be honest, the Raiders shouldnt have even had the chance at the
    playoffs. I, for one, was looking forward to a 7-9 or even a 6-10
    record this year. Thats because of Shanahan. Now with a TRUE Raider
    at the helm, nexted year looks a lot brighter. Oh well, go 9ers.
    			Raider_Rich 
    
44.63GENRAL::WADEYou can't always get what you wantWed Dec 27 1989 18:376
    Raider_Rich,
    
    	This is the K & G sports note remember?  Why beat on a
    	dead horse, er, team?  ;^)
    
    Claybone
44.64USRCV1::COLOTTIRYou can't milk a BULL!Wed Dec 27 1989 18:393
    Good one ClayboneR :-)
    		Raider_Rich
    
44.65Only In Moderation, Of CoursewQUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceThu Dec 28 1989 20:0514
44.66Plunkett,Blanda,Morrall,YA Tittle, Doug WilliamsEARRTH::BROOKSEverybody needs a push ....Wed Jan 03 1990 13:2210
    I think Doug Williams is far from finished as a QB. He can still
    throw a strawberry through a locomotive, and if he has decent
    protection, look out. He wouldn't be unprotected except that the
    Skins pay him $1 million a year, and you don't give that to backups.
    
    as for Jay, he had his chance a has blow it. What is really sad
    is that if he had had a better attitude, he'd be the starter in
    Washington right now.
    
    Doc
44.67QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceThu Jan 04 1990 01:188
    You're nuts !!!  Doug "One Game" Williams IS washed up.  He was
    washed up when they beat (Crushed) the Donks in the stupidbowl,
    he just happend to pull a career game out of his A$$ that day.
    If that game were played the day before or the day after it
    would have bee a different story.  Dougie Baby...... You're
    OUTTA HERE !!
    
    But Game
44.68CAM::WAYI ain' nothin' but a simple man...Thu Jan 04 1990 10:5912
Excellent special last night on ESPN about Super Bowl II.

Boy, did that take me back....Lamonica, Banaczak, Starr....

The good ol' days of football.  

Best Play:  Max McGee breaking past THREE defensive backs put on him
	    to box him in, on a third and short to catch a 30+ yard
	    pass!!!!!


Chainsaw
44.69AUSTIN::MACNEALBig MacThu Jan 04 1990 11:563
    Reports out of Newark, NJ claim that a Continental Airlines Jet bound
    for the West Coast had to be delayed for 2 hours while it was cleaned
    up after the Raiders had used it.
44.70QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceThu Jan 04 1990 14:344
    I can beleive that, Mac....  the Raiders are obviously a
    Bunch of slobs.
    
    Big Game
44.71BSS::RIGGENCo Sports teams= BridesmaidsThu Jan 04 1990 15:005
    It couldn't have been the LA Raiders. I suppose they wern't holding the
    stewardess's either ?
    
     It was a bunch of roller derby players dressed in silver and black 
     outfits. 
44.72LUNER::BROOKSEverybody needs an ocassional push...Thu Jan 04 1990 15:1716
    re .67
    
    Boo hoo hoo ... Small Game Hunter, you're jealous that Doug came
    through, unlike Mr Ed.
    
    Not only that, but the civilized world is still waiting for Mr Ed
    to pull a career game out of his a$$, or between his teeth, or wherever
    .....
    
    Finally, it's obvious that you are afraid that Dougie will beocme
    the Raiders QB, and kick the Donks a$$ TWICE a year, instead of
    in Super Bowls.
    
    And that is a fact.
    
    Dr Midnight 
44.74GENRAL::GIBSONThu Jan 04 1990 17:273
    
    I have to agree with Steven. If he does start again it will be because
    whoever he was backing up got injured.
44.75Dr M's IQ + Elways # = 7QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceThu Jan 04 1990 18:0011
    Dear Dr. Mid_Life_Crisis,
    
    
    J  A  M        I  T     !!!!!!!!!!!
    
     Doug is a washed up has-been......  take that to the 
    bank.
    
    Big Game
    
    
44.76Doug ain't dead - yet !LUNER::BROOKSEverybody needs an ocassional push...Thu Jan 04 1990 19:337
    Hey Small Game Hunter (I've seen the pics of those chipmunks, rabbits,
    and housecats that you've mounted in your den), I really burned
    you with De Troof didn't I ?
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA !!!!!!!
    
    DrM
44.77It's the Kinder and Gentler "Big Game"QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceThu Jan 04 1990 19:5215
    Not at all Dr. Midnight,
    
     I have to agree,  Doug did pick a good time to
    pull the career game out of his butt.  But, he is 
    washed up, HOOT even says so.  You know,  I've 
    been meaning to tell ya that I really enjoy your
    notes.  So intelligent.  And I agree with every
    thing you say.
    
    Big Game
    
    
     Now Don't That Make For Exciting Discussion
    
     I'm gonna throw up.
44.78COMET::JACKSONTAGo D!!!!Thu Jan 04 1990 20:2710
      HOOT and you agree on something Jack??  I think I'm going to lose
    it.
      Dougie is washed up,  and I do hope the faiders pick him up, 
    because that will be 2 wins/year for the Broncs.  Look at what Jay baby
    has done for them.
    
      Raiders = New retirement home for has beens!!!
    
    
    		Tj....Who know Raiders suck.
44.79Watch It !!!! The KG police are everywhereQUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceThu Jan 04 1990 23:5314
     There you go again, Tim....... (remember when Ronnie said that)
    I beleive you have forgotten that this is a Kinder&Gentler(tm)
    Conference.  One more outburst like that and we'll have you 
    castrated.  This is not the place to suggest the someone elses
    favorite team may not be up to you standards, let alone that
    it might sip in public.  Remember, Tim...... It pays to be
    Kinder&Gentler(tm)    ;^)
    
    
    Big Game
    
    Gawd.... even I'm getting sick of this !!
    
    Yea !!, I'm doing it again.... My office is a mess.
44.80Maybe the PatriotsCNTROL::MAINTFri Jan 05 1990 00:035
    I disagree, I think Williams will be starting, unless he is still
    playing for the Redskins. If someone signs him through plan B, it would
    only be to start. I think Doug makes about $1,000,000 a year. 
    
                                 Steve J.
44.81better than someCNTROL::CHILDSIn Bubby we TrustFri Jan 05 1990 09:546
    
    Not that I think Doug is great or anything like that but I could see
    him stepping in for the following teams and improving their QB
    situation: Pats, Cards, Colts, Chiefs, Seahawks, Bears, DOnks....
    
    mike
44.82What are you?? NutsQUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceFri Jan 05 1990 11:5212
     Mike,
    
      Was That Kinder&Gentler(tm) SLAM(tm) on Elway or do you honestly
    beleive that Williams could improve Denvers QB situation.  If it 
    is the last of the two, I know about this real sweet land deal
    on the side of Mt St. Helens you might want to get in on.  ;^)
    IMHO,  Doug could only play for 2 of the teams on you list but
    in the interest of being a Kinder&Gentler noter I won't name
    names...
    
    
    Big Game
44.83LA Colesium to be torn down?AUSTIN::MACNEALBig MacFri Jan 05 1990 12:556
    Latest news in the "where will the Raiders be next year" front:  LA has
    reportedly offered to tear down LA Colesium and build the Raiders a new
    facility.  The Colesium is a registered state and national landmark and
    has hosted two Olympic games.  The city is reportedly putting together
    the biggest incentive program ever offered to a sports franchise in
    order to keep the Raiders from moving.
44.84QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceFri Jan 05 1990 13:004
     It would be just like Uncle Al Davis to cause
    something like this to happen.
    
    KG_Big Game
44.86GENRAL::GIBSONFri Jan 05 1990 14:4713
    
    They will definately be in LA next year. Their contract runs through
    next season.
    
    
    Tim,
    For somone claiming to know so much abouut the RAIDERS, like you did,
    your real ignorance of them came gleaming through. Claiming they are a
    retirement home for has-beens is a bit ridiculous considerint the fact
    that they are one of the youngest teams in the league.
    
                                                    HOOT
    
44.87I forgot the K&G againCOMET::JACKSONTAGo D!!!!Fri Jan 05 1990 17:4910
      Ok HOOT,  your telling me they don't suck??  If they didn't,  then
    they would be in the playoffs, right??  If not,  then I guess I'm
    wrong, so shoot me.
    Sorry about that Jack,  But since its been awile since I've been
    arrested,  then I thought I would go for it.
    
      Also HOOT smile, it Friday.
    
    
       Tj....
44.88QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceFri Jan 05 1990 17:526
    Tim, Tim, Tim........
    
     You know that there is nothing worse than a reformed JN'er
    Turn in your keyboard, you're going to jail..
    
    KGBGH
44.89CSC32::SALZERTue Jan 09 1990 17:468
    I feel all of the intrique and suspense of "Will the Raiders move?"
    "Where will they move to?" has been played to the hilt. When you cut
    through it all it boils down to one question. Who cares? They are 
    still a mediocre team with some potential. Shit or get off the pot.
    [insert smiley here]
    
    BoB
    
44.90Just kidding, don't be offended anyoneQUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceWed Jan 10 1990 10:0713
    Who Gives a Flying %^&%^&*%^&
    
    This team will be bad for at least another 3 to 4 years.
     
    The just don't have the Brains in the front office or
    at head coach to pull themselves out of the tail spin
    any quicker.
    
    Big Game
    
    p.s.  Shell out of a job by end of next season,  Hoot Gibson
    	 Hired as head giver, I mean head coach.  Brings the Parrot
    	 in as Offensive Coordinator.   many many ;^)  HOOT!!
44.91CSC32::SALZERTue Jan 23 1990 16:2912
    Well I thought we might bring the Shanahan debate over here.
    Remember when Al hired him?  All the Raid fans were snickering
    about the deal especially the way Al handled it and how 
    furious Reeves was. As it turns out, Shanahan turned out
    to be a Trojan horse.  The latest  but not last laugh is
    Denver's. Perhaps part of Al's agreement would be to allow
    Mike a free hand in coaching staff selection and that's reasonable.
    That's how Willie got axed but when it comes to player roster
    decisions, Davis holds the trump cards. To try and convince
    me otherwise would be very difficult indeed. 
    
    BoB
44.93COMET::MONTGOMERYThe Greek,Cosell,P.BowlenTue Jan 23 1990 17:2920
 >   Remember when Al hired him?  All the Raid fans were snickering
 >   about the deal especially the way Al handled it and how 
 >   furious Reeves was.

Well Bob I was one that was not Snickering..... I took a stance of lets see
what he does with the team that 1st year ie: Nothing. then all the comments
started coming in from the players and most everyone on the team did not like
him. ie: Not RAIDER material... I know that's hard for you to understand, you
have to be a RAIDER fan for about 12years or so to understand it.
Shanny is a good coach, don't get me wrong but not for the RAIDERS, he does'nt
know RAIDER football and never did... That was some of the problems that
Uncle Al had with him.. yeah maybe he ok for the Donk's but not the Siver&Black.
Watch, Shanny will get another head coach job, maybe even the donk's after
they lose the S.B. and Pat B. starts chopping head starting with Collie Boy, 
after all 3 times and no ring does spell trouble for a coach. Look at all
the changes just this season with coaches who only had a few years with a team.
Art will bring the RAIDERs back to their winning ways!!!!

Monty

44.94GENRAL::GIBSONTue Jan 23 1990 18:3532
    
    BoB,
    I neither saw RAIDER fans snickering. I did see/hear most donk fans
    whining about the "dirty way Davis hired him", which was really
    laughable. 
    
    Steven,
    Your comments about Shanahan firing the whole coaching staff couldn't
    be further from the truth. I think you were being facetious, but I'm
    not sure. Leggett quit because of Shanahan. Brown is a highly regarded
    coach, he was being considered for the head coaching job along with
    Shanahan but Davis thought he needed more experience before becoming a
    head coach. I can't remember their names right now but the old O-line
    coach retired and the only coach fired was the RB coach. Shanahan
    brought in new people for those two spots. Brown was there last year.
    Shanahan fired him abruptly in the off season, sealing his own fate
    unless his people got the team playing top notch physical ball (in the
    RAIDER tradition). In reality what he accomplished was allot of
    animosity on the team with his juvenile rules and pussy-foot style of
    ball which resulted in their poor start and his own inevitable firing.
    
    
    Rumor Control:
    
    Rumor has it that Andre Ware will come out this year and will be taken
    by the RAIDERS either in the supplemental draft or trade up in the
    regular draft to get him. Earlier Ware denied any and all reports of
    him coming out this year but recently he has said he would have to look
    at the situation more closely.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.95a bigger need especially if he decides to play baseballCNTROL::CHILDSBroncos&AmericanStandardafinepairTue Jan 23 1990 18:518
    
    Hoot, I think the Raiders would be better served to go off and get
    a running back. They have a QB in Beurlien, if they can keep him
    healthy. he's got a good arm seems to have sense and guts. Jay is
    a decent backup if he just gets his head together.....
    
    
    mike
44.97GENRAL::GIBSONTue Jan 23 1990 20:4216
    
    Can't say that I disagree with you Mike. It is just a rumor that I
    heard. I think their top priorities would be a dominate LB (like
    everyone else), safety (McElroy is old and has been injury prone the
    last two years, Eddie Anderson is adequate at one spot but they need
    someone to take over for McElroy. Harden, Carter and Lee aren't cutting
    it), and then RB (I think Bo will quit after next season and Allen is
    getting old. Vance Mueller is a good ballplayer but not a game breaking
    threat). I'm sure there will be surprises. There usually are.
    
    You win the three year old giant carnival cigar, Steven, for filling in
    the blanks. Two that you missed were Art Shell and Terry Robiske, TE
    coach/assistant to the head coach.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.98COMET::MONTGOMERYCan Collie, Win Super BowlFri Feb 02 1990 14:1914
Here's a good one!!!!

Seem's that Majkowski from Green Bay want's to be a RAIDER!!!!

Of course that's every boy's dream growing up!!!!

They would be nut's in G.B. to let him go, He's probley doing it to
raise his $$$$$$$$.....

Of course he would look good in Silver&Black!!  ;^)


Monty    

44.99Just Win, Baby!CAM::WAYRevenge is a dish best served cold...Fri Feb 02 1990 14:380
44.101GENRAL::GIBSONMon Feb 05 1990 13:0723
    
    Steven,
    I just put in what he said. I also noted that the report said Green Bay
    said they would match any offer. What's your problem?
    
    Shanahan cut Millen.
    
    Hilger was drafted out of Oklahoma St., given a chance, didn't pan out,
    and was cut. I don't understand what you are getting at there.
    
    Lachey. One out of three ain't bad. At least your doing better than the
    donks.
    
    "Half the league wants to  be a RAIDER". I'm only going by what the
    players say. They want to play for Davis because he treats his people
    well.
    
    RAIDERS in desparate need of a QB? Hardly. Beuerlein is entering his
    third year. I have no doubt that he will prove you wrong. I think you
    have him mixed up with Elway.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.102Its left to funnin' timeCOMET::JACKSONTAStill AFC Champs, plus 2nd bestMon Feb 05 1990 19:167
      Every boys dream to be a raider??   Thats funny...Can't stop laughing
    
      Hey Monty,  shouldn't you say,  It's every boys worst nightmare if he
    was a raider?? ;^^^)
    
    
    		Tim
44.103GENRAL::GIBSONFri Feb 16 1990 18:5810
    
    Pete Rodriguez (sp?) was fired as special teams coach. He took the same
    job with the Cards. Steve Ortmayer takes his place. 
    
    This was not unexpected. In what was very uncharacteristic of the
    RAIDERS over the years, they gave up several long kick returns this
    past season. The writing was on the wall.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.104FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Feb 16 1990 19:116
    Hoot, one thing I do like about the Raiders organization is that
    Al Davis always seems to have a place for those guys who try for
    other jobs but not have the other job work out.  I'll bet he's glad
    to have Ortmayer back.  I'll bet Ortmayer's glad to be back.
    
    John
44.105GENRAL::GIBSONFri Feb 16 1990 19:498
    
    I agree, John. I think Ortmayer was with them in a front office
    capacity this past season, but I'm not sure. Rattle my memory.
    Where did he go/what was his job when he left a couple of years
    ago?
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.106FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Feb 16 1990 20:575
    Ortmayer was Special Teams Coach through the 1986 season when he
    went to SD and he was with SD for 3 seasons before getting booted
    after this season.
    
    John
44.107JULIET::MAY_BRWimp football rules!Fri Feb 16 1990 22:093
    
    Raiders should announce their return to OAkland in the next week
    or two.
44.108LET'S PARTY !FRSBEE::BROOKSDrM : The Conscience Of SPORTSMon Feb 19 1990 12:384
    re .107
    
    
    YEEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
44.109GENRAL::GIBSONMon Feb 19 1990 15:092
    
    Thanks John.
44.110COMET::MONTGOMERYA BIG 8^)Mon Feb 19 1990 15:2015
>          <<< Note 44.107 by JULIET::MAY_BR "Wimp football rules!" >>>

    
 >   Raiders should announce their return to OAkland in the next week
 >   or two.


Are you pullin our legs Bruce or is this something being said in the Bay area??


Monty




44.111FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Feb 19 1990 15:248
    Dealing with the Raiders' front office is always very confusing
    because they give their employees very ambiguous titles.  When I
    look at their front office list, I'm never really sure who is
    responsible for what.  And I gots to know when they play here because
    I need to know who to send the official final score sheet to.
    
    John
    
44.112JULIET::MAY_BRWimp football rules!Tue Feb 20 1990 21:2027
    
    Davis should commit soon.  He wanted to stay in LA, if the Coliseum
    Commission would build him a new stadium, since the current one
    can not realistically be retrofitted to today's standards (luxuryboxes,
    closer to the action, etc).  LA agreed to tear down the Coliseum,
    and build a new one, to Al's specs.  IT seemed that the Sac/Oakland
    bargaining had played into Al's hands and he got what he wanted,
    a new stadium.  However, a bunch of conservationalists got upset
    and made a move to have the Coliseum named a state historical site,
    making it impossible to get torn down.  End of new plan, end of
    Al wanting to stay in LA.
    
    Last week Oakland/Alameida officials agreed to give Al the deal
    he has asked for.  He has two weeks to accept.  He was in town last
    week working out the details.
    
    Now we've all seen Al get close like this before and nothing has
    happened, so who knows if this is for real.
    
    One more item-  LA Times took a poll of Southlanders and asked them
    what they thought of the Raiders leaving.  82% said they didn't
    care.  It shouuld be pretty clear to everyone that the Raiders never
    made it in LA (I don't know that any football team ever really has)
     and that moving was a mistake from the start.
    
    
    Bruce
44.113EARRTH::BROOKSDrM : The Conscience Of SPORTSWed Feb 21 1990 12:449
    Amen Bruce ! The Raiders effectively lost their homefield advantage
    when they left Oakland, not to mention their image.
    
    I also tend to feel that LA fans have a definite front-runner streak
    in them.
    
    Prediction : If the Raoders return to Oakland, they'll unseat Denver
    for the AFC West title. Elway's 1st game in O-A Collesium will
    necessitate the use of Depend undergarments on his part ....
44.114PWRVAX::RIEUWe're Taxachusetts...AGAIN!Wed Feb 21 1990 12:564
    >I also tend to feel that LA fans have a definite front-runner streak
    >in them.
       Spoken like a true Laker fan! 
                                        Denny
44.115EARRTH::BROOKSDrM : The Conscience Of SPORTSWed Feb 21 1990 13:059
    Sorry Denny - I speak of LA *football* fans ... they sort of tolerated
    the Rams like an obligation, and the Raiders were seen as a diversion
    from the beach.
    
    We Laker fans are a loyal breed ...
    
    Doc
    
    p.s. What happened to the Septics last night ?
44.116AXIS::ROBICHAUDSkiing,Soccer,Quiche,LimpWristsWed Feb 21 1990 13:279
	This is what you said Doc:
    
    I also tend to feel that LA fans have a definite front-runner streak
    in them.


	Freudian slip?

				/Don
44.117PWRVAX::RIEUWe're Taxachusetts...AGAIN!Wed Feb 21 1990 13:565
       Just football eh? How 'bout those 'loyal' Angels fans who were
    filing out of the 'Big A' during the 7th inning of a NO-HITTER
    a couple years ago!
       Just change things around to suit yerself Dock, we understand.
                                           Denny
44.118Even Ray Charles could see that I wuz talking 'bout footballFRSBEE::BROOKSDrM : The Conscience Of SPORTSWed Feb 21 1990 14:255
    > just change things around to sui yerself ...
    
    You should know, Penny ...  :-)
    
    drM
44.11929067::J_HERNANDEZAH,AH,EE,EE,TUKI,TUKIWed Feb 28 1990 11:271
    L.A. fans didn't like the paRaiders 'cuz they're bums. 
44.120JULIET::MAY_BRWimp football rules!Wed Feb 28 1990 12:0611
    
    Oakland Coliseum/City Council meet something like Mar 12th to vote
    on getting the Raiders.  Davis should announce beforehand.
    
    re -1
    
    They are bums only because they didn't win in LA.  LA only supports
    teams that win.
    
    
    Bruce
44.121Sacramento doesn't want 'emAUSTIN::MACNEALBig MacWed Feb 28 1990 15:121
    Sacremento is going to let their bid for the Raiders expire.
44.122CNTROL::CHILDSlow altitude earth orbit, me? ha-haWed Feb 28 1990 15:234
    
    Max Montoya was signed by the Raiders yesterday as plan B free agent..
    
    mike
44.123Ortmayer? You Can Have Him!CSC32::G_MCINTOSHVom Hochland German SheperdsWed Feb 28 1990 16:3914
    Ortmayer was the Chargers Director of Football Operations.  That's
    essentially a GM.  He SUCKED at the job too.
    
    He alone is responsible for the Clay & McCallum for Lachey trade that
    burned the Chargers.  He alone is responsible for Gary Anderson sitting
    out the season.  Hell, I blame him somewhat for the Chip Banks fiasco.
    
    He sucked and I'm glad to be rid of him.  (And honestly, I'm not sure
    he was entirely loyal to the organization anyway.  Lachey for Clay &
    McCallum.....AWFUL TRADE!)
    
    Live from Charger Central.....
    
    Glenn
44.124GENRAL::GIBSONWed Feb 28 1990 17:4115
    
    Didn't win in LA? Say what? They won two Super Bowls in LA.
    
    Ortmayer is going back to what he does best, coaching. The Chargers
    hired him for a top front office job. He didn't work out there. He is a
    good coach. He will handle special teams.
    
    Hopefully Montoya has a couple of Pro Bowl type years left in him. I
    imagine he will play left guard with. From all reports I have read, and
    not all from the RAIDERS press, last year's rookie right guard, Steve 
    Wisniewski, is expected to become All-Pro material quickly. He graded
    out very high.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.125STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Feb 28 1990 17:458
    re .124:
    
    >	Didn't win in LA? Say what? They (Raiders) won two Super Bowls in LA.
    
    Weren't they still in Oakland when they beat Philadelphia in 1980?
    
    
    py
44.1262 in Oakland, 1 in LASHALOT::HUNTSend lawyers, guns, and money ...Wed Feb 28 1990 17:475
    Yes, they were still the Oakland Raiders when they won Super Bowl
    XV in New Orleans over the Eagles in January 1981.   That was the
    weekend that the Iranian hostages came home, for trivia's sake.
    
    Bob Hunt
44.127GENRAL::GIBSONWed Feb 28 1990 17:583
    
    You are right. The deal had been struck but they were still in Oakland.
    
44.128COOKIE::MJOHNSTONVigilantes for a brighter futureThu Mar 01 1990 13:027
44.129GENRAL::GIBSONThu Mar 01 1990 13:522
    
    That's what Raygun wanted everyone to believe.
44.130AYNRND::REILLYI'm a loner, Dotty, a rebel...Tue Mar 13 1990 09:234
    
    "Oakland" once more...
    
SEAN/BEER=LABATTS
44.131CAM::WAYFire...Tue Mar 13 1990 10:2010
Sean --

Where'd the p-name come from?  It is SOOOOO familiar.  Sounds to me
like Jack Nicholson, but I cain't quite place it....

The OAKLAND Raiders...ah the good ol' days...  Now if we could just
get the Cardinals back to St Louis, the Colts back to Baltimore,
and the Dodgers back to Brooklyn, we might be makin' some progress 8^)

'Saw
44.133AYNRND::REILLYI'm a loner, Dotty, a rebel...Tue Mar 13 1990 13:196
44.134CAM::WAYFire...Tue Mar 13 1990 14:361
Well, I was close....Pee Wee Herman.  Jack Nicholson...same difference ;^)
44.135COMET::MONTGOMERYA BIG 8^)Tue Mar 13 1990 15:034
Now that the RAIDERS are moving, I have to go out and buy new T-shirts
again....  That's OK....


44.136Why not Irwindale?CSC32::SALZERTue Mar 13 1990 15:166
    The Oakland Raiders?  I was just starting to get use to calling them
    the LA Raiders. This is good news.  With the addition of more 
    wild card teams in the new formatt, they might even make the playoffs.
    
    BoB
    
44.137GENRAL::GIBSONTue Mar 13 1990 16:4723
    
    RE: Why not Irwindale?
    
    First of all they really wanted to go back to Oakland and Oakland made
    them an offer they couldn't refuse, $602 million for 15 years.
    
    Second, the site where Irwindale proposed to have the stadium built is
    on the breeding grounds of some rare bird. It is doubtful that they
    could build there. 
    
    Third, Irwindale was short on $$$.
     
    Fourth, Irwindale pulled their offer off the table.
    
    
    As far as, "might even make the playoffs" goes. Won't that be a breath
    of fresh air? Denver fans should very much welcome this. It will keep 
    Denver from having every Super Bowl record set against them, what few 
    that haven't already been. They have a coach now, to go along with the
    talent also.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.138Gotta go back one further 'Saw.CSC32::GL_JOHNSONMy lethal weapon is my mindTue Mar 13 1990 21:228
re: .131
>get the Cardinals back to St Louis,
    
         The Cardinals football franchise originated in Chicago, 
    then moved to St. Louis before moving to Phoenix.
    
                        			  Glen J.
    
44.139CAM::WAYTake her deep, rig for depth chargeWed Mar 14 1990 10:426
Okay, Glenn....

Let's get them Cardinals back to Chicago.  And while we're at it
let's put the A's back in Kansas City/Philly (you pick)....

Chainsaw
44.140FRSBEE::BROOKSReal men don't *DO* House MusicWed Mar 14 1990 11:577
    A's would have to move back to Philly. If they went to KC, they
    just be a Yankee feeder team again.
    
    Yup, Bo and Saberhagen in pinstripes ..... :-)
    
    But what we really ought to do is rebulid the Polo Grounds and Ebbetts
    Field .....
44.141Prob'ly no ball this year, let's fantasize then...CAM::WAYLevel off at 300, rig for silent runningWed Mar 14 1990 12:217
44.142Maybe we should get rid of the ownersCSC32::GL_JOHNSONMy lethal weapon is my mindWed Mar 14 1990 13:1720
    re: .139
    
         One 'n' please Frank.  You might as well call me Gl.....d(
    I can't even say it). :-)
    
         No offense intended on my statement.  Seemed that you were saying
    that it would be nice if things(in this case, teams and stadiums) 
    could retain their original locale and character, instead of moving
    and building mausoleums just for money's sake.  I agree with you on 
    that.  
    
>    But what we really ought to do is rebulid the Polo Grounds and Ebbetts
>    Field .....
    
         Just recalling the fond memories my father used to have of 
    both of those places makes me wish that I could have seen them before 
    they were demolished.  Once the Giants and Dodgers left NY and
    Brooklyn, he lost his enthusiasm for baseball.
    
                                                 Glen J.
44.143CAM::WAYLevel off at 300, rig for silent runningWed Mar 14 1990 13:3727
44.144Bring the Braves back to Boston and ship the Sox to Hartford.AXIS::ROBICHAUDFun,fun,fun...Wed Mar 14 1990 15:251
    
44.146Bring Gilligan's Island back to network prime time!SASE::SZABOWed Mar 14 1990 16:381
    
44.147COMET::MONTGOMERYA BIG 8^)Wed Mar 14 1990 16:453
Bring this note back to talking about the RAIDERS!!!!!
    

44.148AXIS::ROBICHAUDI cain't be bought...outWed Mar 14 1990 16:474
    	The Steelers beat the Raiders fair and square in the '72 playoff
    game.
    
    				/Don
44.149Here ya go!7983::RIEUWe're Taxachusetts...AGAIN!Wed Mar 14 1990 16:492
       The REF screwed the Pats in the '76 playoff game.
                                        Denny
44.150COMET::MONTGOMERYThe OAKLAND RAIDERS!!!!Wed Mar 14 1990 16:5415
>    	The Steelers beat the Raiders fair and square in the '72 playoff
>    game.
    
  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA(tm)   yeah right!!!!



re: Denny

The RAIDERS were screwed by Sam Seal in the Pats playoff game....
I will never forgive that clown!!!!!


Monty
44.152Jim Jupiter was stiffed! :-)SASE::SZABOWed Mar 14 1990 16:581
    
44.153RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONo matter where you go,there you areWed Mar 14 1990 17:194
    Jim Lytle fumbled in the 77 playoff game, unfairly giving the Donks
    the title!
    
    JD
44.154Send Clevscum(tm) back to the AAFC !LUNER::BROOKSReal men don't *DO* House MusicWed Mar 14 1990 17:461
    
44.155Rob LytleGENRAL::GIBSONWed Mar 14 1990 19:231
    
44.156Marino want to be an Oakland Raider!SUNRIZ::JBONINJohn Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBAThu Mar 15 1990 12:008
Marino hands off to Bo, and *another* 90+ yard touchdown for Bo!


Seriously, the Raiders would become instant meat and potatoes!



John
44.157COMET::MONTGOMERYThe OAKLAND RAIDERS!!!!Thu Mar 15 1990 12:577
>                   -< Marino want to be an Oakland Raider! >-

So does 99% of the NFL!!!!! You never hear of a player saying that he wants
to be a Donk do you!!!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA(tm)


Monty
44.158GENRAL::GIBSONThu Mar 15 1990 13:103
    
    Marino wanted to be traded last year, also. Don't bet on him going
    anywhere.
44.159ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Mar 15 1990 16:564
     I'd like to see Marino playing for the RAIDERS, I'd also like
    to see the RAIDERS get Andre baby seeing as how he's foregoing.
    
                                                           Carlos
44.160Yet, another 8-8 seasonCOMET::JACKSONTASpring FeverMon Mar 26 1990 15:577
      I hear the faiders got another looser of a QB.  Booby Habear (sp?)
    from the Aints.  So now they will have Gay and Booby or is that Jay and
    Bobby.
    
      Marino in Black & Silver???  All rumors....
    
    		Tim
44.161re .160: HebertSTAR::YANKOWSKASTeenage Mutant Ninja NoterMon Mar 26 1990 16:361
    
44.163ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Mar 27 1990 14:0411
    I don't think Hebert is officially a Raider yet, according to the
    local paper Hebert says he has talked with Al Davis and plans on
    joining the Raiders practice on May 9th, but Al says the Raiders
    are still negotiating and are interested in Hebert and Marino.
    Ron Brown, however, is official and he will be a fine addition.
    He is a very talented athlete that can play WR,DE,and on special
    teams. I think he was the fastest man in the NFL a couple of years
    ago, and I'm sure he's still right up there.
    
                                                                   
     Carlos
44.164GENRAL::GIBSONTue Mar 27 1990 15:0910
    
    Carlos,
    Isn't Brown a bit on the small side to play DE? Ha ha! I know, you
    meant DB. The RAIDERS plan to make him a DB and kick returner since
    I think Bobby Joe Edmunds signed with someone else, forget who, since
    he was unprotected. The RAIDERS also lost back-up DE, Mark Mraz, to
    Denver. Good pick-up for Denver. He will probably start.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.165AUSTIN::MACNEALBig MacTue Mar 27 1990 15:472
    The Saints owner has denied reports that Hebert is going to the
    Raiders.
44.166Oops!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Mar 27 1990 16:436
    My mistake, he is a DB, but with his speed maybe they could use
    him as a DE and have him zip around the offensive line, especially
    against teams that have QBs that like to scramble like old horse
    face himself. Then again, with great ideas like that it's no wonder
    I work for DEC instead of somewhere in the NFL.
                                                      Carlos
44.167Figure this one out JULIET::MAY_BRWimp football rules!Tue Mar 27 1990 18:3011
    

    Al Davis was meeting with Tom Bradley Sun. and has worked out a deal
    where he will talk only with Spectacor (the managers of the LA
    Coliseum) and not the LA Coliseum Commission (who he doesn't get
    along with).  Speculation is that he is using the Oakland deal that
    he made to up the ante in LA, and possiblly stay there.
    
         
    Maybe Hoot an Monty can explain this one.
    Bruce   
44.1697983::RIEUIn search of...Mr Trout!Wed Mar 28 1990 09:573
       HE already screwed Irwindale out of $10 million. Why should he stop
    now?
                                           Denny
44.170Al is not one to turn down a $10 million gift4159::NAZZAROThanks Minutemen, for a GREAT year!!Wed Mar 28 1990 13:424
    Hey, if Irwindale is STUPID enough to give him a non-refundable
    check for $10 million, they DESERVE to be screwed.
    
    NAZZ
44.171Now to confuse some with the facts.GENRAL::GIBSONWed Mar 28 1990 13:4218
    
    He didn't "screw" anyone. Irwindale pulled out.
    
    Since the Colisium Commission was so incompetent, Spectacor took over.
    It has absolutely nothing to do with Davis not getting along with the
    commission, who screwed him royally in breaching their contract by not
    completing the agreed upon renovations. A couple of city council-
    critters in Oakland are trying to get enough signatures to put the issue
    of bringing the RAIDERS back on the ballot. If they are successful at
    getting the required 20,000 signatures, it will be on the Nov. ballot.
    Spectacor approached Davis to try and talk him out of going back to
    Oakland and to make an offer for them to stay. Why wouldn't he listen?
    Spectacor also said that if they don't get the RAIDERS to stay in LA,
    they will try to get another NFL team to move there (preferrably) or go
    for an expansion team.
    
                                                   HOOT
      
44.172Screwed if you pull out - or fi you don't ! HAHAHA !EARRTH::BROOKSNo, idiot ! Not Bush ...BROOKS !Wed Mar 28 1990 13:579
 
    re .171
    
>    He didn't "screw" anyone. Irwindale pulled out.
           
    Substantial penality for early withdrawl, eh Hoot ?
    
    I hope Irwindale didn't pull out too soon ... heh heh heh ....
    
44.174FTMUDG::DUGGANWed Mar 28 1990 14:0911
    re: going after another team:
    
    How about the 
    
    LOS ANGELES RAMS! What a concept! They wouldn't even have to change
    their name.....
    
    8*)
    
    ...mike
    
44.175GENRAL::GIBSONWed Mar 28 1990 19:3922
    
    But the Rams moved out of LA. Of course noone whines about them
    supposedly "screwing" someone over it. Or the Cards, Jets, Giants,
    Colts, Chargers, Chiefs ect.,for that matter.
    
    Come on Steven. Davis didn't seek out the LA people, they came to him
    after they found out about the move by some in Oakland to stop the city
    from putting up the big bucks to get them back. I doubt the people will
    vote it down. Unless Oakland's mayor has Dan Reeves/Pat Bowlen Liars
    Syndrome, the city will break even from the money generated by the
    RAIDERS being there. He said it isn't intended to be a money making
    proposition but a morale boosting rallying point for a down community
    since the people there still love the RAIDERS, witness last year's pre-
    season game there. Then he said they would not be losing money. I did
    not catch the fiscal details. If by chance Oakland does turn them down,
    staying in LA would be the contingency plan. Don't expect it to happen.
    
    Doc,
    Brutal, simply brutal!
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.176JULIET::MAY_BRWimp football rules!Wed Mar 28 1990 22:4257
           <<< OURGNG::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                 -< OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 44.171                       The "RAIDERS"                       171 of 175
GENRAL::GIBSON                                       18 lines  28-MAR-1990 09:42
                    -< Now to confuse some with the facts. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    

    
>    Since the Colisium Commission was so incompetent, Spectacor took over.
>    It has absolutely nothing to do with Davis not getting along with the
>    commission, 
    
    EVERYTHING I've read here  has said that the problem is that Al
    and the C.C. just don't get along.  I would say that the Bay Area
    media is probably a lot more objective about this than Al or any
    of his cronies.  I don't understand the incompetent part.
    
    
 >   who screwed him royally in breaching their contract by not
 >   completing the agreed upon renovations. 
                                    
    screwed royally may be an overstatement.  So the seats that are
    going to be empty anyway didn't get fixed, big deal.
    
 >                                       A couple of city council-
 >   critters in Oakland are trying to get enough signatures to put the issue
 >   of bringing the RAIDERS back on the ballot. If they are successful at
 >   getting the required 20,000 signatures, it will be on the Nov. ballot.
    
    It's not a couple city council people are trying to get the signatures
    (there wasn't even 2 city council votes against the idea), it regular
    citizens who are concerned where the money could go.
    
    
>            Spectacor approached Davis to try and talk him out of going back to
>    Oakland and to make an offer for them to stay. Why wouldn't he listen?
 
    How about because he said he was definitely going back to Oakland.
    Oh, that's right, were only talking about going back on his word.
    I guess he could listen.
       
 >   Spectacor also said that if they don't get the RAIDERS to stay in LA,
 >   they will try to get another NFL team to move there (preferrably) or go
 >   for an expansion team.
    
    Spectacor has said they doubt they'd get an expansion team.
    Coincidentally, Spectacor is the company that SF was using to build
    their downtown stadium.
    
    
    Bruce
      
  
      
44.177JULIET::MAY_BRWimp football rules!Wed Mar 28 1990 22:5868
================================================================================
Note 44.175                       The "RAIDERS"                       175 of 176
GENRAL::GIBSON                                       22 lines  28-MAR-1990 15:39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    
>    But the Rams moved out of LA. Of course noone whines about them
>    supposedly "screwing" someone over it. Or the Cards, Jets, Giants,
>    Colts, Chargers, Chiefs ect.,for that matter.
 
    Talk to some Baltimore fans.  They do in fact whine about it.  And
    although the Giants, Rams, Jets (you forgot the Pats) did move out
    of the city they are in, they are still within the same metropolitan
    area, and a reasonable commute to the games (its actually closer
    for many of the fans).  Comparing the Raiders move to the Dallas
    Texans moving to KC is ludicrous.
                 
>    Come on Steven. Davis didn't seek out the LA people, they came to him
>    after they found out about the move by some in Oakland to stop the city
>    from putting up the big bucks to get them back. 
                                                    
    But Davis didn't say "no, I already promised Oakland." either.
    
>                                                    I doubt the people will
>    vote it down. 
                   
    Don't be so sure.  Most of the Raider fans are from the East Bay,
    and not Oakland.  Only the people of Oakland get to vote and the
    way the petitioners have fanned the flames with propaganda, the
    move is in definite doubt.  Don Perata, who is responsible for getting
    the Raiders to move back, has said that if the thing gets put on
    the ballot, he's sure the Raiders won't be here.
    
 >                  Unless Oakland's mayor has Dan Reeves/Pat Bowlen Liars
 >   Syndrome, the city will break even from the money generated by the
 >   RAIDERS being there. 
                              
    There is one monstrous if in all those statements: IF every game
    is a sell out for the next 15 years.  The city has promised to buy
    up any unsold seats.  And none of that is figured into any of anyone's
    calculations (except Al's).  If you consider that there has been
    some erosion of the fan base in the last 10 years (especially when
    you consider that the 9ers are the glamor boys of the Bay Area)
    and that, contrary to popular belief, the Raiders didn't always
    sell out when they were here, there is a large risk that the city
    will be buying up some seats overe the next few years.
                                                          
>                              He said it isn't intended to be a money making
>    proposition but a morale boosting rallying point for a down community
>    since the people there still love the RAIDERS, witness last year's pre-
>    season game there. Then he said they would not be losing money. 

    Essentially what is happening is the city of Oakland is financing
    the Raiders to come back, to the benefit of the entire East Bay/
    Alameda County.  They aren't in any shape to do that.  
                                                                   
>                                                             I did
>    not catch the fiscal details. If by chance Oakland does turn them down,
>    staying in LA would be the contingency plan. Don't expect it to happen.
 
    Don't be surprised if it falls apart.  Al seems to be showing to
    me that the least little opposition to this and he'll be running
    back to LA.  I think it would teach him a lesson if the people said
    'no', but I bet he'll be gone before they even get a chance to vote.  

    Bruce
    
44.178COMET::MONTGOMERYThe California RAIDERSThu Mar 29 1990 13:0881
          <<< Note 44.176 by JULIET::MAY_BR "Wimp football rules!" >>>

           <<< OURGNG::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                 -< OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 44.171                       The "RAIDERS"                       171 of 175
GENRAL::GIBSON                                       18 lines  28-MAR-1990 09:42
                    -< Now to confuse some with the facts. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    

    
>    Since the Colisium Commission was so incompetent, Spectacor took over.
>    It has absolutely nothing to do with Davis not getting along with the
>    commission, 
    
*    EVERYTHING I've read here  has said that the problem is that Al
*    and the C.C. just don't get along.  I would say that the Bay Area
*    media is probably a lot more objective about this than Al or any
*    of his cronies.  I don't understand the incompetent part.
 
They said that they would do this and that but yet never even drove one nail
in anything to bring up the standards of the Colisium. If it wern't for the
big Olympic games that place would have fallen in on itself a few years ago.
The place is a shambles!!!
   
    
 >   who screwed him royally in breaching their contract by not
 >   completing the agreed upon renovations. 
                                    
*    screwed royally may be an overstatement.  So the seats that are
*    going to be empty anyway didn't get fixed, big deal.
    
The big deal was Delux boxes around the top of the Colisium and whole new
seating in some area's... The RAIDERS/Donk's game last year had a record
crowd for that game.. Something like 90,000+ They usually get about 50,000
for each game... Hell the dam places sit's about 103,000....

 >                                       A couple of city council-
 >   critters in Oakland are trying to get enough signatures to put the issue
 >   of bringing the RAIDERS back on the ballot. If they are successful at
 >   getting the required 20,000 signatures, it will be on the Nov. ballot.
    
*    It's not a couple city council people are trying to get the signatures
*    (there wasn't even 2 city council votes against the idea), it regular
*    citizens who are concerned where the money could go.
 
This will be the big issue of the RAIDERS coming back to Oakland... Most folks
want the money to go somewhere else... But where do you start to bring back
some replenishment to a place that's been slowly going down hill....
   
    
>            Spectacor approached Davis to try and talk him out of going back to
>    Oakland and to make an offer for them to stay. Why wouldn't he listen?
 
*    How about because he said he was definitely going back to Oakland.
*    Oh, that's right, were only talking about going back on his word.
*    I guess he could listen.
 
He's put up the the lies of the C.C. for a long time and I beleave that he
is taking a dim veiw of these Spector people. Wern't they the bad guy's in
the James Bond movies????
      
 >   Spectacor also said that if they don't get the RAIDERS to stay in LA,
 >   they will try to get another NFL team to move there (preferrably) or go
 >   for an expansion team.
    
*    Spectacor has said they doubt they'd get an expansion team.
*    Coincidentally, Spectacor is the company that SF was using to build
*    their downtown stadium.
 
Hell Most of the Donk fans would like to see that team go...;^) Any ties
with this Spector people and the 49er's?????? Makes you wonder....
   
    
    Monty
      
  
      

44.179GENRAL::GIBSONThu Mar 29 1990 13:2922
    
    Davis "going back on his word"
    
    Hardly. If Oakland says "No", how do you turn that into Davis going
    back on his word? As far as Davis is concerned, it was a done deal.
    Oakland is the party that is saying, "well maybe not, now".
    
    RE: incompetence
    
    That is why Spectacor is in and The C.C. is out. C.C was doing a lousy
    job and were canned. Of course Davis didn't get along with them. Anyone
    would be a bit PO'd at a group that breached a multi-million dollar
    contract on them. They were under contract to put in skyboxes (big $$
    income), install seats closer to the field (as it is now the fans are
    about as far from the field as in any stadium in the country), ect.
    
    Sure I can see how some of you don't like the guy but trying to blame
    him for Oakland possibly pulling out at the last minute and ragging on
    him because he is looking at other options if Oakland pulls out, is
    simply ludicrous.
    
                                                   HOOT 
44.180SpectacorSHALOT::HUNTA single ping please, Vasily.Thu Mar 29 1990 13:3110
    By the way, Spectacor is a Philadelphia company owned by the
    Snider family, the same Sniders who own the Philadelphia Flyers
    hockey team and the Philadelphia Spectrum facility.
    
    Spectacor's business is sports arena planning, construction,
    operations, management and maintenance.  They have done some
    serious worldwide growing in the last few years.  They get called
    in on just about all new sports construction projects these days.
    
    Bob Hunt
44.182;^)CNTROL::CHILDSABTL=ABTP these daysThu Mar 29 1990 14:496
    
    But Steven isn't Uncle Al's present way the American Way?
    
    did I get lost somewhere? 
    
    mike
44.183ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Mar 29 1990 15:038
      It amazes me, as to how someone can make such a purely brilliant
    comment as : " the Raiders have turned to crap and you *can't* argue
    with that. " with the fore knowledge that this team has beaten his
    beloved Broncos three of the last four times they've played, and
    something like forty to nineteen as a series.
    
                                                      Carlos
    
44.184how many days until the season begins??? 8^)LEVERS::STROUTIs that Wilt DISGUISED as Jordan??Thu Mar 29 1990 15:080
44.186CAM::WAYBe excellent to each otherThu Mar 29 1990 16:2023
44.187JULIET::MAY_BRWimp football rules!Thu Mar 29 1990 16:3563
           <<< OURGNG::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
                 -< OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 44.178                       The "RAIDERS"                       178 of 186
COMET::MONTGOMERY "The California RAIDERS"           81 lines  29-MAR-1990 09:08
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> The big deal was Delux boxes around the top of the Colisium and whole new
> seating in some area's... The RAIDERS/Donk's game last year had a record
> crowd for that game.. Something like 90,000+ They usually get about 50,000
> for each game... Hell the dam places sit's about 103,000....
  
    My point was, and still is, that even if they built those seats,
    no one would buy them LA has just not taken to the Raiders (and
    there is no need for you to go in and edit my reply by capitalizing
    the team name),  They had one big crowd at one game, and still averaged
    around 50,000 (or less).  Think what the attendance will be this
    year, when the people know the team is probably gone.  Could that
    be why Al is still leaving hints that he might be in LA?  To get
    people to go to the game under a false pretense that the team won't
    leave afterall?  Nah, Al wouldn't do anything underhanded, would
    he.
  
> This will be the big issue of the RAIDERS coming back to Oakland... Most folks
> want the money to go somewhere else... But where do you start to bring back
> some replenishment to a place that's been slowly going down hill....
   
    I realize that you are a bit removed from the situation, but youy
    shouldn't speak about something you don't know about.  Oakland isn't
    slowly going downhill.  If anything they have turned things around
    considerably.  The A's have helped contribute to that. 
                                                         
                                                         
> He's put up the the lies of the C.C. for a long time and I beleave that he
> is taking a dim veiw of these Spector people. Wern't they the bad guy's in
> the James Bond movies????
  
    Al loves the Spectacor people.  They are the ones trying to cut
    another deal with him.  Aside to Bob Hunt-- I think Spectacor was
    recently bought by a big conglomerate, McGraw-Hill comes to my mind.
                                                                        
    
>*    Spectacor has said they doubt they'd get an expansion team.        
>*    Coincidentally, Spectacor is the company that SF was using to build
>*    their downtown stadium.                                            
 
>Hell Most of the Donk fans would like to see that team go...;^) Any ties
>with this Spector people and the 49er's?????? Makes you wonder....
   
  Great, here comes a Raiders fan with another of their great conspiracy
    theories.  Spectacor was going to build a downtown baseball stadium
    for the Giants.  It had absolutely nothing to do with the 9ers.
    They care very little about what happens.  The only Raiders fans
    left are a few diehards, the rest have become 9ers fans.  With the
    way the 49ers look for the next few years, there is no reason to
    think that that would change.

    
    Bruce    
      
  
      

44.188JULIET::MAY_BRWimp football rules!Thu Mar 29 1990 16:5048
Note 44.179                       The "RAIDERS"                       179 of 187
GENRAL::GIBSON                                       22 lines  29-MAR-1990 09:29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    
>    Davis "going back on his word"
    
>    Hardly. If Oakland says "No", how do you turn that into Davis going
>    back on his word? As far as Davis is concerned, it was a done deal.
>    Oakland is the party that is saying, "well maybe not, now".
 
    Oakland hasn't said no, a few people have passed out petitions.
     Oakland (the mayor and his council, the only people who speak for
    Oakland now) has said yes, and Davis said yes.  About a week later,
    Davis was back in LA, talking to the Mayor of LA and Sp[ectacor
    about another deal.   
 
>        RE: incompetence   
                       
>    That is why Spectacor is in and The C.C. is out. C.C was doing a lousy
>    job and were canned. Of course Davis didn't get along with them. Anyone
>    would be a bit PO'd at a group that breached a multi-million dollar
>    contract on them. They were under contract to put in skyboxes (big $$
>    income), install seats closer to the field (as it is now the fans are
>    about as far from the field as in any stadium in the country), ect.
 
    The CC was NOT canned.  Spectacor is merely a liason between the
    two parties.  
       
>    Sure I can see how some of you don't like the guy but trying to blame
>    him for Oakland possibly pulling out at the last minute and ragging on
>    him because he is looking at other options if Oakland pulls out, is
>    simply ludicrous.
         
    I didn't blame him for Oakland possibly pulling out at the last
    minute.  Where did you get that?  Unless you are going to use lesson's
    from the Monty School of Advanced Editing, you won't find anything.
    My point is that why is he already talking to Spectacor?  Nothing
    will be decided in Oakland until the end of the year, and he doesn't
    even need a stadium for two years after that.  All he is doing by
    engaging in those talks is getting people in Oakland more upset
    about a deal that was marginal at best.  
         
    Bruce    
         
         
         
         
44.189Pick on someone the Broncos can beat !ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Mar 29 1990 17:379
      Steven, you've missed my point. I just think it's strange that
    you call my team "crap" when we both know that my team beats your
    team the majority of the times that they play. Kinda like a sore
    loser or something. I agree with you that they are not as good in L.A.
    as they were in Oakland, but they're far from crap. Since they've
    been in L.A. they've won the Super Bowl once; How many times have
    the Broncos won it since they've been in Denver ?????
    
                                                    Carlos
44.191GENRAL::WADEIs it the shoes!Thu Mar 29 1990 18:4011
*    team he puts on the field is at a lever far below what I have grown 
*    accustomed to. One of the biggest reasons for that letdown is
*    lack of fan support,
    
Steve,
    	Exactly, what *lever* are you talking about.  You should see
    	your doctor about that letdown problem....:^)  Do you really
    	need to do that in front of a fan (could be dangerous!).
    
Claybone
    
44.192GENRAL::GIBSONThu Mar 29 1990 20:4128
    
    I don't get your point, Bruce. I say "if Oakland says no", you say
    Oakland hasn't said no. Sounds like the same thing to me. When you say 
    Davis went back to LA and talked to the mayor and Spectacor you failed
    to mention this was after the petition started and that they came to
    Davis. The rumors are that Davis was going to buy out his contract in
    LA for at least 1991, and possibly 1990, with the Oakland money. If he
    doesn't know until Nov. whether they will be turned down or not that
    doesn't leave him much time. In the mean time his current contract is
    running out and these things aren't ironed out very quickly. Oakland is
    the stumbling block, not Davis. What's he supposed to do? Sit back and
    wait to see if Oakland is going to back out of a done deal, leaving him
    one year to iron out a multi-faceted, multi-million dollar contract
    with a deadline approaching quickly? That would be a very stupid
    business move. Davis and the RAIDERS want to come back to Oakland.
    Oakland is hee hawing around, well maybe but then again maybe not. I
    don't live in the area but I certainly disagree with your claim that
    there are only a few diehards left in the area that care about the
    RAIDERS. If that is true, how do you explain last year's pre-season
    game selling out in a matter of a couple of hours? A few back you also
    claimed they didn't always sell out in Oakland. True. But they also had
    a sell out streak of something like 13 years running. (I don't remember
    the exact number). Finally, your last extraction of my note did not
    have your name in it. Why claim you didn't say something that you
    werent being accused of in the first place?
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.193Team owners: always looking for something for nothingNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Mar 29 1990 22:5628
    
    
    This whole issue is a great example of what happens when people take
    sports so seriously that they feel they must defend the local team or 
    owner against all reason.  For me, nothing could be more deliciously
    ironic than for the *people* (not the politicians) of Oakland to tell 
    the Los Angeles Raiders and Al Davis where to stick it.  Don't get me
    wrong, I don't have anything against Al Davis personally.  I was one of
    those "whining" Colts' fans, and I'd be just as happy to see Bob Irsay
    or Bill Bidwell fall flat on their faces as Al Davis (so far, it looks
    like Bidwell is).  It would be nice, just once, to see those
    disenfranchised "fans" who we all know don't really have a say anymore 
    in pro sports, become the screwers, instead of the screwees.
    
    Forget those arguments over the impact that a pro sports team has on
    the local economy, especially in a diverse recreational area like the
    Bay.  A study, reported in Sports Illustrated last week, confirmed what
    I've believed all along: that while sports events *are* an economic 
    boon to businesses in the immediate vicinity of the stadium, if the 
    sports events aren't available, people will generally spend that money 
    elsewhere in their leisure time.  Add the expenses for extra police, 
    etc., and it's an overrated economic proposition.  In the case of 
    Oakland, it's doubtful that the popularity of the Raiders can make up 
    the $60 million investment up front, plus whatever number of $55 
    tickets Al isn't able to sell. 
    
    glenn
    
44.194COMET::MONTGOMERYThe California RAIDERSFri Mar 30 1990 12:3625
re: Bruce

I allways put the RAIDERS in big letters... I did not edit your reply to
do that... Maybe you did it and didn't know it... hmmmmm

I was in Oakland about 3.5 years ago and it didn't look like much was being
done about the place... I hope that thing's are starting to take on a rebuilding
for all those folk's.... Even went by the old stadium too.....

Come on Bruce , the way you sound in this note is like you don't want to
see the RAIDERS back in Oakland... Afraid that they could take away from the
49ers??? Masses of people crossing the bridge??? When I went to a 49ers game
about 3.5 years ago there were hundred's of people at the 49ers game with
Oakland RAIDERS jackets on, me included!!!! so I don't think that many people
have converted to the 49ers just some bandwangers, there are still true
RAIDER fans in the Bay area......


Monty





44.195LUNER::BROOKSNo, idiot ! Not Bush ...BROOKS !Fri Mar 30 1990 12:4523
    Monty, the Bay Area is my birthplace. One day, I'd love to go back
    and live there. And I believe that the Raiders true home is Oakland.
    Not LA, Irwindale, West Toyko, Sacramento, or the Sea Of Tranquility.
    
    But there should be limits as to our emphasis on sports. Any deal
    with the Raiders should include renovations to O-A Colliseum. Period.
    NO city fail-safe ticket buying, no something-for-nothing gimmicks.
    Just a nice, solid package that's fair to both sides.
    
    I'm willing to predict that if the people don't beg Al, then he'll
    lower his price tag - considerably.
    
    But I'd hate to see the people of Oakland bankrupt themselves to
    get the Raiders back - nothing is worth that.
    
    If the Quake proved anything, it should have gotten our priorties
    straight about sports and things that *really* matter.
    
    Have they ? I hope so .....
    
    Let Davis twist in the wind ....
    
    Doc
44.196If this is plan B, what was plan A ?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Apr 09 1990 17:508
       Does anybody know anything about the following plan b players
    that the RAIDERS aquired: Ron Burton, LB, Phoenix ; Joe Campbell,
    LB, San Diego; George Streeter, DB, Chicago? I've never seen or
    heard of these guys in all my life, are they any good? I have heard
    of two of the other players the RAIDERS got ( Ron Brown, and Max
    Montoya ) they're both pretty good. Also, any news on what's going
    on with Marino and Hebert, it's been to quiet.
                                                      Carlos
44.197good backupHPSRAD::SANTOSYou can't tough thisMon Apr 09 1990 18:367
    Ron Burton, LB Pheonix. Going into his 4rd year in the NFL from NC State.
    Played two years for Dallas was cut after Cowboys got two linebackers in
    the  Herschel trade with Minny last October. Strong against the run, big
    hitter, real weak on pass coverage. Not a bad MLB, good on special teams.

chuck
44.198GENRAL::GIBSONMon Apr 09 1990 19:477
    
    RE: Marino and Hebert
    
    Miami is saying Marino will stay, unless they get the farm.
    
    New Orleans is saying they haven't, and don't plan to, talk to anyone
    about trading Hebert.
44.199AlzadoCOOKIE::SIMONFri Apr 13 1990 12:316
    read in the paper this morning where Lyle Alzado is allegedly coming
    out of retirement to be a "part-time pass rusher" and assistant coach.  
    
    Hmmm...maybe Davis will next sign George Blanda as a part-time field
    goal kicker, and Ken Stabler as a part-time hand-off-quarterback.
    The Raiders might go for job sharing.
44.200COMET::MONTGOMERYI'm the NRAFri Apr 13 1990 17:1912
>    read in the paper this morning where Lyle Alzado is allegedly coming
>    out of retirement to be a "part-time pass rusher" and assistant coach.  
    
 You gotta stop readin the Inquirer......
 either that or Uncle Al has brain damage to let him play....


After the things he said about John, he really pisses me off!!!


Monty
44.201GENRAL::GIBSONMon Apr 16 1990 15:2113
    
    Monty,
    I heard it also. That was Alzado talking. There is no way you will see
    a 41 year old pass rusher in the NFL that hasn't played since 1985.
    Couple that with the fact that he was trying to lose weight for his
    acting career, i.e. quit doing steroids, I don't see it happening. I do
    agree with you that he is a jerk. Right after he retired he admitted to
    doing steroids. Now he claims he didn't, bad publicity ya know. He is a
    bad actor and out of the limelight so he pulls this BS to get his name
    back into the media. 
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.202Alzado: 10 sacks and an Oscar in 1991COOKIE::SIMONMon Apr 16 1990 18:5810
    
    re: .-1
    
    >> doing steroids. Now he claims he didn't, bad publicity ya know. He is a
    >> bad actor
           
    
    He is NOT a bad actor;  why, he and E.B. the Energizer Rabbit have such
    on-screen charisma that I can see an Emmy next year in the commercial
    category for both of them.
44.203BSS::G_MCINTOSHVom Hochland German ShepherdsTue Apr 17 1990 11:165
    I heard on the news this morning that the deal between the Raiders and
    the City of Oakland may be dead.  I didn't hear anymore, so I don't
    know the details.
    
    Glenn
44.204It's daid!SALEM::RIEUIn search of...Mr Trout!Tue Apr 17 1990 11:584
       From what the Globe said Sunday, It will lose at the polls. More
    people (50,000) signed the petition to put it on the ballot, than
    voted for the mayor in the last election.
                                       Denny
44.205JULIET::MAY_BRWimp football rules!Tue Apr 17 1990 18:447
    
    The Mayor of Oakland has given up on the deal.  The Raiders said
    if it ever went to a ballot, they would cancel the deal.  The
    petitioners got 30,000 signatures, enough to put it on the ballot.
    The Raiders are said to be looking for a new home.
    
    Bruce
44.206FRSBEE::BROOKSThe roof is on fire ! ...Tue Apr 17 1990 21:479
    Al Davis blew it .... I'm willing to bet that other cities will
    finally wake up, smell the coffee, and stop giving into the blackmail.
    
    Hopeful prediction : Davis will take the Raiders back to Oakland,
    but for much less.
    
    I'm glad to see that the people have their priorties straight. I
    love the *Oakland* Raiders as much as anyone, but hell take care
    of the schools (the system is out of money) first ...
44.2087983::RIEUIn search of...Mr Trout!Wed Apr 18 1990 15:023
       Mebbe the raiders should play all road games. We could just call 'em
    'Al's Nomads'.
                                               Denny
44.209GENRAL::GIBSONWed Apr 18 1990 15:189
    
    I don't think it will really bother the players, if they don't go to
    Oakland, too much. They were planning on playing in LA this year
    anyway. They are still under contract to play there. I do agree with
    you that the home field advantage will be nil in a cavernous stadium
    with noone there. I heard that Davis had already given some concessions
    to the original Oakland deal by dismissing Oakland's offer of
    guarenteed ticket sales. I wouldn't be surprised if he gives in on
    several other issues also to complete the deal. 
44.210RAMS are betterCOMET::JACKSONTABaseball=overrated, BB &amp; FB= real mans sportWed Apr 18 1990 19:565
      Gee, I thought the SB was discustingly funny, but this move deal with
    the raiders is worse.  AS long as Uncle Al controls the team,  then
    this bs will continue.
    
    	Tj
44.211Hows Fresno sound?29637::SALZERWed Apr 18 1990 21:105
    Let Al eat cake. It's probably starting to taste a lot worse than
    that though. Irwindale is starting to sound better and better all
    the time. Open up Al, here comes a big old spoon full. Hee-hee!
    
    BoB
44.212Major yes, Rice noAUNTB::HAASsame as talking to youTue Apr 24 1990 09:576
The Raiders took Major Harris on the 12th round. Harris was the last of
the eligible juniors drafted.

FWIW, Tony Rice of Notre Dame was not drafted.

TTom
44.213ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Apr 25 1990 14:406
    What's the deal on Harris, as far as what kind of player he is
    or can be, I don't know to much about him or any of the other
    draftees for that matter.
    
                                                        Carlos 
    
44.214RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGea Johnson, you make everythang...Wed Apr 25 1990 15:1016
    Carlos,
    
    Harris' arm was questioned by scouts after tryouts.  Many felt it
    wasnt of pro-caliber.  Also, he and his agent have actively pursued
    playing in the Canadien league, and prior to draft-day, it was rumoured
    they were close to signing a deal with the British Columbia team
    ( i heard that on the Canadien broadcast station before the draft...)
    So, that no doubt attributed to him falling through the cracks.
     Remember, Bo Jackson slipped to what, the 9th round...
    
    According to USA Today, the Raiders draft graded out to a B.  They
    didn't pick up OL or DB help that then needed.  Put emphasis on
    boistering pass rush with speedy outside guys.  Loaded up on middle
    and late round choices.
    
    JD
44.215Bo knows draft picksSHALOT::HUNTA single ping please, Vasily.Wed Apr 25 1990 15:2010
    Bo Jackson was the very *first* player drafted in the 1985 NFL
    draft.
    
    Tampa Bay drafted him and he spent the summer playing AA baseball
    in Memphis.
    
    I forget how the Raiders got him.  Did they draft him in the 9th
    round in 1986 ???
    
    Bob Hunt
44.216CAM::WAYCumberland Mountain #9Wed Apr 25 1990 15:227
44.217EARRTH::BROOKSChild of the Revolutionary GenerationWed Apr 25 1990 15:5810
    Major Harris not having a strong arm ? HAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!
    
    Typical b.s. propaganda by the 'scouts'. Funny, but The Major's
    arm looked damned strong to me when I saw him play .... he could
    fire a football something like 60 yards flatfooted. And considering
    the job he did this year with a less-than-awesome WVU team, he deserved
    better .....
    
    Oh well, if Al Davis and crew are paitent, the Raiders may have
    gotten an all time Steal Of The Draft ...
44.218ROCK::GRONOWSKIA. Bunker, George (Wallace, Brooks)Wed Apr 25 1990 16:183
    
    re: -1   See above.........................^
    
44.219REFINE::ASHEMiss America, USA, Playmate '90,&amp; meWed Apr 25 1990 16:331
    What does .217 have to do with .218 except the author?
44.220GOMETS::mccarthyMike McCarthy MRO4-2/C17 297-4531Wed Apr 25 1990 16:4111
I don't think the Raiders will get the chance at Harris.  I don't 
think he'll settle for 12th round money when the CFL will probably
pay a lot more.

Too bad.  I think in a run and shoot, or an attack that that lets
the QB improvise (similar to Cunningham and the Eagles) Harris
could excel.

I hope he gets the chance someday.

Mike
44.221RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGea Johnson, you make everythang...Wed Apr 25 1990 16:4422
    Doc,
    I got it wrong - "Harris' passing accuracy and ability to play
    pro-style offense were questioned."
    
    Like it or not, but QB's that come out of wishbone and option type
    offenses do not get rated as highly as those who play the pro-set.
    It was also felt that the Major could have used the extra year because
    a weak QB year turned into a pretty decent one with all the juniors
    coming out.   Teh CFL move was dumb on his agent's part - shouldn't
    have revealed it til after the draft.  Why pick a guy high when
    you know he's close to signing with Canada - and you retain his
    rights for 4 years, but after then....
    
    Like it or not, the NFL scouting combines don't look at college
    record - they look at ability - and passing accuracy and pro-set
    experience are two important factors for QBs.  Look at RB Johnny
    Bailey, he lasted til the 9th despite rushing for 6,320 career yards,
    Duke's Clarkston Hines who set the NCAA career record for TD catches
    lasted li the 9th - both are considered too small, as was LB Ned
    Bolcar of Notre Dame.
    
    JD
44.222Major take the money and run.HPSRAD::SANTOSm&amp;m's are to hard to peelWed Apr 25 1990 16:539
    Doc, The problem with Harris was not his arm strenght but his passing
    ablity. He would pass with a different arm motion everytime (side arm,
    over the top, held the ball low). All examples of poor coaching. He also
    failed real bad the test offered to college qb to find the open receivers.
    Hes a great athlete and every team in the NFL would have given him
    the chance to develope if they thought he would sign, he stands to 
    make more money in the CFL. 
    
Chuck
44.223COMET::MONTGOMERYLe Lo ElwayWed Apr 25 1990 17:036
I think Harris will do well in the CFL and in about 2 years want to come
down and play the real game.... The RAIDERS will have his ass tied up for
what about 4 years or so if he wants to come back down......


Monty
44.224EARRTH::BROOKSChild of the Revolutionary GenerationWed Apr 25 1990 19:3826
    JD and Monty,
    
    I don't think the Raiders have Harris' rights for 4 years, do they ?
    
    I thought it was one year tops, then he goes back into the draft,
    then becomes a free agent, right ? 
    
    re .222
    
    Chuck, take a good look at Bernie Kosar - he's the only QB I've
    seen with 3 different arm motions during a single attempt. That
    is immaterial.
    
    I must agree with you JD, his agent played it stupid. He gave the GM's the
    opening they needed to pass on him, costing Major some serious bucks.
                                                            
    And once again, I thought that Major coming out early was not a
    good move - this proves it. It will probably cost him big bucks.
    
    re Johnny Bailey,
    
    I'm really disappointed by that. Which team got him ? I don't care
    what anybody says, Bailey is a smaller version of Barry Sanders,
    and knows how to make people miss. He can flat out RUN !
    
    Doc
44.225RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGea Johnson, you make everythang...Wed Apr 25 1990 20:0116
    Doc,
    
    According to the report in USA today, the Raiders keep his rights
    for 4 years IF he signs with the CFL - if not I believe they have
    him for a year - unless he makes the team or they trade him, etc.
    
    If he goes to Canada, and he performs well, it may seem like a
    brilliant move - because thanks to Warren Moon and Joe Theismann,
    there is a precedent.  
    
    A lot of juniors make bad decision.  There's a local guy - UWash
    - a DB named Burkholter or sumthing - he went out early, and said
    he expected to go in the 5th-6th round - he wasn't picked.  He put
    on a brave face, but he was obviously devastated.
    
    JD
44.226GENRAL::GIBSONWed Apr 25 1990 20:0235
    
    The BIG difference between Harris and Kosar is that Kosar is accurate
    and poised. Harris is extremely erratic and gets rattled very easily.
    
    The RAIDERS hold his rights for 4 years IF he signs with Canada. If he
    just sits out a year, ala Bo, he goes back into the draft.
    
    I will be VERY surprised if Harris ever plays in the NFL. He is not an
    NFL calibre QB. I saw him play a few times and thought he was
    incredibly over-rated/over hyped. He is not that good. He tries to be a
    one man show. He gets "happy feet", throws it up for grabs regularly
    under pressure, and is very inaccurate. The only real plus I see in him
    is that he has excellent "athletic ability".
    
    He wasn't a "bad" pick. It was the last round. It was known that he is
    looking toward Canada. If by some miracle he turns into a top quality
    QB in Canada, the RAIDERS retain his rights for 4 years. They don't
    fork out big bucks for a stiff but could get a good player later. Being
    the last round they really didn't miss out on anyone. They can now sign
    any player not drafted to a free agent contract. All-in-all, I would
    say that he was a good 12th round pick.
    
    I think Bo was taken in the 4th round after he sat out a year.
    
    Carlos,
    I never heard of Smith, 1st round, either. From what I have heard since
    the draft he was a DE @ Arizona. He only weighed something 255 but
    built up to a solid 270 now. He is fast and projected as being able to
    switch from DE to OLB, ala Townsend. I was happy to see them get Aaron
    Wallace in the 2nd round. I have seen him a couple of times and he is a
    bigtime hitter. Most of their other picks, I have never heard of. I
    will put in the scouting reports when I get them.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.227JULIET::MAY_BRGive me hope JohannaWed Apr 25 1990 20:2213
    
    I think it was probably a great pick.  A 12th round pick almost
    always does nothing anyway.  Now they have a chance to get him groomed
    in the CFL for a few years (when he wouldn't be playing in the NFL
    anyway, he'd be learning the system).  Once that is over, they'll
    have an idea of whether to sign him or not.  No risk at all to the
    Raiders.  
    
    I believe he is Raiders property until 1 year after his contract
    with the CFL expires, unless he goes back into college.  It looks
    like a good move, a la the Jackson or Walker signings.
    
    Bruce
44.228FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Apr 25 1990 20:2913
    I saw Harris play live once this season, and he's the type of player
    who looks to run first and pass second.  I'm not sure how much of
    that is due to happy feet.
    
    It is a good, low-risk move for the Raiders.
    
    So many of these guys have such an over-inflated opinion of themselves.
    Whether it's an agent telling them to come out for the money, or
    pro scouts not being straight with them about their chances, these
    guys end up being hurt.  The NFL looks like the bad guys when in
    reality the league is in a no-win situation.
    
    John
44.229Nap a Raider again.BSS::G_MCINTOSHVom Hochland German ShepherdsFri Apr 27 1990 10:586
    The Raiders have "acquired Napolean McCallum from the Chargers for an
    undisclosed future drate choice."
    
    Live from Charger Central....
    
    Glenn
44.230COMET::MONTGOMERYLe Lo ElwayFri Apr 27 1990 13:235
Wonder if they will use him as a fill in till Bo get's home....

Monty


44.231Will they try to trade Marcus ???HPSRAD::SANTOSm&amp;m's are to hard to peelFri Apr 27 1990 13:464
    Is Nap done with his navy duty???

Chuck
44.232BSS::G_MCINTOSHVom Hochland German ShepherdsFri Apr 27 1990 16:013
    Not yet.  I think his committment is up in July.
    
    Glenn
44.233UPWARD::HEISERMr. Potato Head Groove ThingFri Apr 27 1990 17:102
    Will the Raiders go after McMahon?  He'd be a natural in the silver &
    black!
44.234McMahon is only as good as his team ....LUNER::BROOKSChild of the Revolutionary GenerationFri Apr 27 1990 17:282
    MacMahon is McOverrated ..... keep him ..... stick with Schroeder,
    Berulein or Harris
44.235Besides,his arn is toast.JOULE::DIGGINSBoy I wish I had Talant!Mon Apr 30 1990 17:186
    
    McMahon is a stiff.
    
    
    
    Steve
44.236FSCORE::PAVEZKAseton ni segassem cinataSTue May 01 1990 11:225
    The Raiders have told Major Harris' agent to suspend talks with BC of
    the CFL until `certain things' have happened.  They have also said not
    to worry about 12th-round money.
    
    pete
44.237try and try againCOMET::JACKSONTAPlay a mans sportFri May 04 1990 21:241
      It don't matter,  the faiders still need a "quality" qb.
44.238<Schedules>ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon May 07 1990 15:302
    Anybody know what the pre and regular season schedule looks like?
    
44.239FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon May 07 1990 15:3723
    Regular Season (all times Eastern)
    
    Sun 9/9	Denver		4
    Sun 9/16	at Seattle	4
    Sun 9/23	Pittsburgh	4
    Sun 9/30	Chicago		4
    Sun 10/7	at Buffalo	730
    Sun 10/14	Seattle		4
    Sun 10/21	at San Diego	4
    Sun 10/28	Open Date
    Sun 11/4	at Kansas City	1
    Sun 11/11	Green Bay	4
    Mon 11/19	at Miami	9
    Sun 11/25	Kansas City	4
    Sun 12/2	at Denver	4
    Mon 12/10	at Detroit	9
    Sun 12/16	Cincinnati	4
    Sat 12/22	at Minnesota	4
    Sun 12/30	San Diego	4
    
    Don't have the preseason schedule.
    
    John
44.240ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon May 07 1990 16:433
    Thanks for the schedule , but whats the deal with the open date?
    
    Carlos
44.241STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasMon May 07 1990 16:566
    >	whats the deal with the open date?
                                  
    17 week season this year.  Every team has one open date.  
    
    
    py
44.242FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon May 07 1990 17:328
    NFC West teams are off the weekend of Sept 30, NFC East, Oct 7;
    AFC East, Oct 14; NFC Central, Oct 21; AFC West, Oct 28; AFC Central,
    Nov 11 and 5th place teams from last year, Dec 16.  1990 and 1991
    have the 16 games played over 17 weeks and the week off between
    the Conference Championships and Super Bowl is eliminated; beginning
    in 1992, the season will be played over 18 weeks.
    
    John
44.243should be interestingCNTROL::CHILDSand remember always use your elbowsWed May 09 1990 10:4213
    
    announced on Arsenio Hall last night, at 41 years old Lyle Alzado
    will be attemping a comeback. Says he's been working with some
    Russian doctors and trainers who have rebuilt his muscles with
    different exercise.
    
    great answer when Arsenio asked why:
    
    "I've got this burning desire still in my stomach, that I love to
    kick ass and I still can do it so I'm going"...or something to that
    nature......
    
    mike
44.244COMET::MONTGOMERYBrowns Bite Donks 10/8/90Wed May 09 1990 14:507
   > Says he's been working with some
   > Russian doctors and trainers who have rebuilt his muscles with
   > different exercise.
    
    Read this as a new Roid!!!!


44.245CNTROL::CHILDSand remember always use your elbowsWed May 09 1990 15:047
    
    Naw he was saying how they design the exercises to pull the muscle 
    away from the bone first and then rebuilt it through arobic style
    exercises to repair the liasions and tears. Oh and of course he
    quaranteed they win a championship with him back....
    
    mike
44.246We knew he had it all along7983::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu May 10 1990 10:3311
             <<< Note 44.200 by COMET::MONTGOMERY "I'm the NRA" >>>


>>    read in the paper this morning where Lyle Alzado is allegedly coming
>>    out of retirement to be a "part-time pass rusher" and assistant coach.  
    
> You gotta stop readin the Inquirer......
> either that or Uncle Al has brain damage to let him play....


>Monty
44.247CSC32::SALZERFri May 11 1990 15:476
    It's been no secret to the Raider faithfull. They have known for quite
    some time now even though they won't admit it. The man is loosing it. 
    Al is going to sign Hulk Hogan next week and appoint him as 
    Director of Player-Personell. Yes indeed! 
    
    BoB   
44.248COMET::MONTGOMERYBuzz Blows Bid for OhioFri May 11 1990 17:5314
>>    It's been no secret to the Raider faithfull. They have known for quite
>>    some time now even though they won't admit it. The man is loosing it. 
 
hahahahahahahahahaha (tm)

Uncle Al has made some moves in the past that were a bit strange but in
the end those moves have proven to be right on the money!!!!

Of course some moves made by Blevves (ala sideline tony) have proven there
worth... $$$$$$ flushed....

Monty

44.250COMET::MONTGOMERYBuzz Blows Bid for OhioFri May 11 1990 18:4418
    
    >> Uncle Al has made some moves in the past that were a bit strange but
    >> in the end those moves have proven to be right on the money!!!!
    								^
    								|
								|
   >   Like moving the team to LA?				|
    								|
								|
    				he did make lots of this---------

and one other by taking a chance on a Q.B. from an east coast team that
was traded to S.F.


        
    

44.251Losin' it fer shurWMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Mon May 14 1990 12:037
       Here's a little tidbit out of yesterdays Globe:
    
    The hottest rumor circulating around some NFL circles is that the
    raiders mistakenly drafted Arizona defensive end Anthony Smith in the
    belief it was his teammate, Pats top choice Chris Singleton, rather
    than Smith who had had drug problems.
                                        Denny
44.252Inquiring Minds Want to KnowELMAGO::CGRIEGOMost Heinous, Dude !!!Mon May 14 1990 13:591
    What kind of drug problem does or did Anthony Smith have???
44.253COMET::MONTGOMERYBuzz Blows Bid for OhioMon May 14 1990 14:125
Has anyone heard the talk going on about Williams going to the RAIDERS???



Mnty
44.254BSS::G_MCINTOSHVom Hochland German ShepherdsMon May 14 1990 14:4512
    Monty, do you mean Doug Williams?  I did read something about that last
    week.  Maybe he and Schroeder will again compete for a backup spot.  
    
    IMHO, if the Raiders don't keep Beurlein in the starters job, they're 
    stupid.  
    
    But I tell you what I DO like....the rise, once again, to prominence of
    the AFC West....soon to again be the best division in football. 
    Raiders improving, Seahawks maybe falling, Broncos the same, Chargers
    moving up, and KC looking tough.  Go AFC West.
    
    Glenn
44.255ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMost Heinous, Dude !!!Mon May 14 1990 15:008
       If they're gonna go after experienced QB's I think they
    would do good to sign McMahon, rather than Williams, although
    he's got a big mouth and they're both injury prone, IMO he's
    better than Williams. But rather than going after QB's they
    should work with what they've got in Beurlein, Schroeder, and
    Harris and concentrate on filling other more needed positions.
                                                        
                                                   Carlos
44.256They blew the 1st rounderWNDMLL::SCHNEIDERI will not instigate revolution.Mon May 14 1990 15:0110
    >The hottest rumor circulating around some NFL circles is that the
    >raiders mistakenly drafted Arizona defensive end Anthony Smith in the
    >belief it was his teammate, Pats top choice Chris Singleton, rather
    >than Smith who had had drug problems.
    
    Probably why most writers who rate how each team did in the draft place
    the Raiders dead last.  Something like 3 of the 4 ratings I saw had the
    Raiders there, and the 4th wasn't too hot a grade either.  
    
    Dan
44.257IAMOK::AHEARNRams vs. Bengals in SB XXVMon May 14 1990 15:038
    From what I've heard, they haven't identified the drug that the
    Raiders' draft pick is on...but they have determined beyond a shadow of
    a doubt that HE SWEATS TOO MUCH!!!!
    
    
    Schlep hip hpos,
    
    Nelly
44.258COMET::MONTGOMERYBuzz Blows Bid for OhioMon May 14 1990 16:3523
>    Monty, do you mean Doug Williams?  I did read something about that last
>    week.  Maybe he and Schroeder will again compete for a backup spot.  
 
Yeah ,  Doug... Afriend told me yesterday that he heard the rumor
   
>    IMHO, if the Raiders don't keep Beurlein in the starters job, they're 
>    stupid.  
   
I agree 100% Glenn............
 
 >   But I tell you what I DO like....the rise, once again, to prominence of
 >   the AFC West....soon to again be the best division in football. 
 >   Raiders improving, Seahawks maybe falling, Broncos the same, Chargers
 >   moving up, and KC looking tough.  Go AFC West.
    
  
Watch out for K.C. in the next few years... The Chargers are turning their
system around and will be a big contender... The donk's are going down the
turlet!!!!!


Monty
44.259Aw SHADDUPGENRAL::WADEGo Broons!Mon May 14 1990 17:241
    
44.260Don'k's only spinningRSST6::RIGGENBurley from bikingMon May 14 1990 17:356
 >>>The donk's are going down the turlet!!!!!

Monty,  The Donk's are only swirling at this time.  The SEAchicken's 
have been flushed. 

Jeff
44.261startin' already!!COMET::JACKSONTAPlay a mans sportMon May 14 1990 18:114
     Look for the raiders to finish last in the division this year.  Too
    much competition for 'em.
    
       Tim
44.262GENRAL::GIBSONMon May 14 1990 19:1015
    
    Smith was a a street gang when he was a kid, ala several other NFL
    players that became stars (Alzado is the first to come to mind). I
    forget the whole story, rather interesting, but I just got their draft 
    report but haven't had a chance to read it yet. I'll try to remember to
    put it in tomorrow.
    
    Dan,
    The reports I have read are quite different from your claims. They got
    a great pass rusher (in college anyway) in Smith and Aaron Wallace, an
    All-American LB that was rated very high by everyone and is a need
    position. Certainly not like that stiff Lageman (sp?).
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.263Hey, I'm not a fan. I'm only objectiveWNDMLL::SCHNEIDERI will not instigate revolution.Tue May 15 1990 15:4127
    >The reports I have read are quite different from your claims. They got
    >a great pass rusher (in college anyway) in Smith and Aaron Wallace, an
    >All-American LB that was rated very high by everyone and is a need
    >position. Certainly not like that stiff Lageman (sp?).
    
    My claims come from well-published local and national publications such
    as The National and The Boston Globe, as well as media experts such as
    Mike Francessa.  
    
    Smith was much worse that "in a street gang as a kid".  His drug
    problems are very recent.  He attended 3 different colleges, which says
    a lot about his stability.
    
    Lagaman was rated as the 5th best NFL rookie last year.  It was said by
    a Raider front office man that he was very disappointed when the Jets
    took him, as the Raiders were planning to take him soon.  I'm sure if
    he had been picked by the Raiders, you wouldn't refer to him as a
    stiff.
    
    Wallace appears to be a good pick for the second round, but I read he
    needs a lot of seaoning.  Don't expect immediate impact.
    
    Unless Smith surprises everyone, he was a bad pick for the Raiders. 
    That is why nearly every publication had the Raiders at or near the
    bottom of draft success.
    
    Dan
44.264COMET::MONTGOMERYBuzz Blows Bid for OhioTue May 15 1990 15:5317
    
>    My claims come from well-published local and national publications such
>    as The National and The Boston Globe, as well as media experts such as
>    Mike Francessa.  
 
Should I laugh now or latter!!  ;^)


   >Smith was much worse that "in a street gang as a kid".  His drug
   > problems are very recent.  He attended 3 different colleges, which says
   > a lot about his stability.
    
   Remember that the RAIDERS have the history of taking guy's like this
   and making them into great players and good people....


Monty
44.265laugh when you wantWNDMLL::SCHNEIDERI will not instigate revolution.Tue May 15 1990 16:1310
   >Remember that the RAIDERS have the history of taking guy's like this
   >and making them into great players and good people....
    
    There is something to that.  But that's a big risk to take on a guy
    with a high draft pick.  There's a lot of teams who wouldn't have taken
    Smith with any pick - they want no part of him.  I also think that with
    the problems this kid as head, he's not your typical Raider loose
    cannon project.
    
    Dan
44.266GENRAL::GIBSONTue May 15 1990 18:1632
    
    And now for something completely different, a little truth...
    
    
    Smith did not go to three colleges. He went to Alabama for 3 years and
    Arizona 1 year. Your claims that his gang/drug activity was recent is
    so far out in left field the Bo Jackson couldn't slam one that far. The
    truth of the matter is, he was in a gang in Jr. High. A football coach
    saw him and talked him into playing. His gang/drug activities stopped
    at that point. Betcha didn't know he plans on being a federal probation
    officer after his football career is over. When Art Shell was asked why
    they took Smith with their first pick since they have Long, Townsend,
    Wise, Davis, Golic and Pickel; Shell replied that they take who they
    feel is the best player available regardless of position and that they
    like his attitude and work ethic.
    
    Pardon me folks for repeating the rebuff of the MU about Lagaman but
    here goes, again. The RAIDERS did not have a 1st round pick. They
    made a trade with Dallas who had the 1st pick in the 2nd round to get
    the guy they wanted, Steve Wisniewski, not Lagaman. From what I had
    read, no other team projected Lagaman higher than a mid round pick,
    except the Jets. Claiming he was the 5th best rookie last year is a
    total joke. Just because he started for the worst team in the AFC
    doesn't make him the 5th best rookie.
    
    Aaron Wallace was considered one of the best pass rushers in college
    ball over his career at Texas A&M. These accolades are backed up by the
    fact that he broke Jacob Green's school career sack record by 5 sacks,
    42 to 37.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.267FSHQA2::JRODOPOULOSWed May 16 1990 12:216
    Being from Texas I agree with your assesment of Aaron Wallace, but
    he tapered off after the season was over thinking he had it made.
    His stock dropped considerably in the eyes of the scouts when he
    decided to eat his way out of a top ten pick.  His attitude made
    many teams turn away from him, but under the Raider system this
    guy will become a player.
44.268Why he's a regular choir boy! Maybe it was Singleton on drugsWNDMLL::SCHNEIDERI will not instigate revolution.Wed May 16 1990 16:2632
    >And now for something completely different, a little truth...
    
    Different for you?  Certainly not for me.
    
    >Betcha didn't know he plans on being a federal probation
    >officer after his football career is over.
    
    Why I had no idea!  He can now marry my sister.  I'm sure these future
    plans means he's a great football player so why not take him in the
    first round when he'll still be there the next day?
    
    >The RAIDERS did not have a 1st round pick. They
    >made a trade with Dallas who had the 1st pick in the 2nd round to get
    >the guy they wanted
    
    Hoot, maybe you should get in touch with the Raiders front office,
    because they are the ones who are telling a different story.  I'm just
    repeating it for your benefit.  Perhaps the two of you can agree on a
    new party line, but they might be a little busy trying to find some
    fans they can bilk at the moment.
    
    >Claiming he [Lageman] was the 5th best rookie last year is a
    >total joke. Just because he started for the worst team in the AFC
    >doesn't make him the 5th best rookie.
     
    And a good joke at that because all kinds of people are repeating it,
    most of whom know what they are talking about.  BTW, a good first round
    pick is expected to make an immediate impact.   I don't see your logic
    in critisizing Jeff for that.
    
    Dan
                    
44.269ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMost Heinous, Dude !!!Thu May 17 1990 12:534
      Major Harris and the British Columbia Lions said Wednesday,
    they are close to signing a contract that would bring the former
    West Virginia QB to the CFL.
                                                 Carlos
44.270FSCORE::PAVEZKAseton ni segassem cinataSThu May 17 1990 15:235
    Harris signed a 2 year deal with the Lions for $75K/ year and a $30K
    signing bonus.  Mark Gastineau is going to try a comeback with the
    Lions as well.
    
    pete
44.271REFINE::ASHEI gotta be me...Thu May 17 1990 15:262
    Gastineau?  Oh, wait, BC Lions, had me worried Detroit ain't no
    place for wimps!!!
44.272PFSVAX::JACOBJunkfergnotenerFri May 18 1990 10:277
    The Pittsburgh Gladiators of the indoor football debacle have said they
    will match any offer made in Canada to Harris and Harris has said he
    will play for the Gladiators if they do match offers.
    
    
    JaKe
    
44.273GENRAL::GIBSONMon May 21 1990 14:565
    
    Dan,
    Just who are these informed sources of yours that you claim named
    Lagaman the 5th best rookie last year? I haven't heard that from 
    anyone except you. Would it possibly be a New York paper? 
44.274TIPTOP::CSSST6Mon May 21 1990 14:575
    Hoot,
    
    I was one of those sources. Why do you ask?
    
    JoJ
44.275I'd say they are reasonably informedWNDMLL::SCHNEIDERI will not instigate revolution.Mon May 21 1990 15:1815
    >Just who are these informed sources of yours that you claim named
    >Lagaman the 5th best rookie last year? I haven't heard that from 
    >anyone except you. Would it possibly be a New York paper? 
    
    It's within the realm of possibility, but, no, it's not a NY paper. 
    The two sources that I know are Bobby Beathard, now the GM of the San
    Diego Chargers and one of the most respected minds in football, and Hub
    Arkish (he just included Lagamen in his top 7 - no rankings after
    Sanders) who knows more about pro football than anyone I've ever heard. 
    He's the editor of Pro Football Weekly.
    
    I know neither of these sources are Al Davis, but they just might know
    what they are talking about anyway.
    
    Dan
44.276Clearly...CAM::WAYGo ask Alice, when she's ten feet tallMon May 21 1990 15:210
44.277COMET::MONTGOMERYLakers to the UndertakersMon May 21 1990 15:269
    >Bobby Beathard 
    
    Take what he say's with a grain of salt.... He's been know to come
    up with some whoppers in the past...





44.278JULIET::MAY_BRGo get'em, MikeMon May 21 1990 16:089
    
    Hoot, It was JOJ's Jets Newsletter.  Do you doubt the source?  8^)
    
    The Oakland Trib just conducted a poll of the people of Oakland
    to find out if they wanted the RAiders back.  It came out
    overwhelmingly negative.  It seems the people are tired of all the
    crap about they are back/no they aren't.
    
    Bruce
44.279GENRAL::GIBSONMon May 21 1990 20:1611
    
    I'm not surprised about the poll results, Bruce. The old fans got
    excited about the return and then get the rug pulled out from under
    them.
    
    Ah yes, Bobby Beathard of the "insiders" fame, or should that be shame?
    He would come up with some wild trade or other "inside" info every
    week. Did any of it ever actually happen? I don't think so.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.280When in doubt, play Invent a StrawmanWNDMLL::SCHNEIDERI will not instigate revolution.Tue May 22 1990 12:2716
    >Ah yes, Bobby Beathard of the "insiders" fame, or should that be shame?
    >He would come up with some wild trade or other "inside" info every
    >week. Did any of it ever actually happen? I don't think so.
    
    Such as?
    
    I wonder why the Chargers hired him, and why he was pursued by so many
    teams to be the head of the organization.  I mean, the Hoot and Monty
    Raider Defense Team say the guy "tells whoppers" and "comes up with...
    wild trades".
    
    Is Beathard really just out of place in the front office of an NFL
    team?  Or does his post-season evaluation of the NFL rookies carry a
    lot of weight?
    
    Dan
44.281He did fairly well in Washington....GENRAL::WADEGo Broons!Tue May 22 1990 12:471
    
44.282Glad he's gone from DCSHALOT::HUNTHeartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay GinTue May 22 1990 13:526
    Beathard did more than "fairly well" with the Deadskins.  That man
    built the Skins into a very tough team.
    
    Joe Gibbs was very lucky to have Beathard acquiring players for him.
    
    Bob Hunt
44.283FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue May 22 1990 13:599
    Bobby Beathard has always been one of the most highly respected
    scouts/personnel directors/general managers in the NFL.  I admire
    him not only because he's done a good job, but he did it in a way
    where it didn't become his whole life.  He has interests outside
    the game, he didn't demand that his scouts spend the entire Fall
    on the road and he's got a good sense of humor.  No reason to bash
    him, other than envy.
    
    John
44.284RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBosco puts whee in your Knee...Tue May 22 1990 14:025
    Beathard is a fantastic gm, personnel director, and judge of talent.
    He was a horrible analyst for football.  It wasn't his element,
    and it was a stupid concept.  Glad to see he got back to doing what
    he does best.
    JD
44.285COBRA::DINSMOREa smile that just melts a man..tylerTue May 22 1990 14:154
    plus, hes a runner, which makes him a great guy.  :)
    
    dinz
    
44.286Just a little Raid bashing.CSC32::SALZERSat May 26 1990 00:3226
    Myth:  Once a Raider always a Raider.
    Fact:  Really? Tell that to Madden or Flores. They can convince
           otherwise.
    
    Myth:  The Raiders have the ability to take cast offs and misfits
           and turn them into winners.
    Fact:  REally now?  When was the last time that happened? Sometime
           early in the last decade?
    
    Myth:  The Raiders are opportunists.
    Fact:  The Raiders use to be opportunists. Their recent season records
           speak clearly enough. 
    
    Myth:  The Raiders have a 'Commitment to Excellence'.
    Fact:  See recent records and playoff showings. That's some committment.
    
    Myth:  The Raiders are only a player or 2 from the bowl.
    Fact:  The Raiders are only a player or 2 from a better than .500
           season.  
    
    Myth:  Al Davis is a football genius.
    Fact:  Al Davis needs to step up, aside or wherever he can to get out
           of the way.  His day is past. Personally, I hope he stays.
    
    BoB  
    
44.287AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Tue May 29 1990 15:413
    A sportswriter from Pittsburgh was quoted in a recent issue of Austin
    paper.  He really ripped into the Raiders for bringing back Lyle
    Alzado.
44.288GENRAL::GIBSONTue May 29 1990 18:123
    
    If .286 was an attempt to get a rise out of someone, I suggest going
    back to the drawing board. That was pathetically weak.
44.289CSC32::J_HERNANDEZKI, CC, EM, SS, are hang'in Tue May 29 1990 19:151
    Sounded kinda true 'tho.
44.290OuchCOMET::JACKSONTAPlay a mans sportTue May 29 1990 20:572
      ditto that!!
    	Tj
44.291ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed May 30 1990 19:5424
    
    >  FACT:  Once a RAIDER always a RAIDER.
    >  MYTH:  Really? Tell that to Madden or Flores. They can convince
              otherwise.
    
       FACT:  They're both still RAIDERS at heart, unfortunately
              they probably advanced as far as they could within
              the RAIDER orginization and moved on to bigger and
              better careers.
    
    >  FACT:  The RAIDERS have the ability to take cast offs and misfits
              and turn them into winners.
    >  MYTH:  Really now? When was the last time that happened? 
    
       FACT:  Sadly, it seems as though they've lost this great ability,
              ex: No matter how hard they tried they just couldn't 
              reshape that loser Shanahan into a winning coach in the
              NFL so they sent him back where he came from.
              
         
            To close to quiting time to continue,maybe later though.
    
         Carlos
    
44.292COMET::MONTGOMERYBlowin whin's again, film at 10Thu May 31 1990 16:0140
I'll help Carlos....

    
>    Myth:  The Raiders are opportunists.
>    Fact:  The Raiders use to be opportunists. Their recent season records
>           speak clearly enough. 
 
	They just went thru another coach change, watch for them to be back
	on top!!!!

   
>    Myth:  The Raiders have a 'Commitment to Excellence'.
>    Fact:  See recent records and playoff showings. That's some committment.
 
	Who still holds the winning percentage for a pro team in any
	sports??? not to be passed soon!!!
	That Commitment also has got them 3 rings on their fingers!!!
   
>    Myth:  The Raiders are only a player or 2 from the bowl.
>    Fact:  The Raiders are only a player or 2 from a better than .500
>           season.  
 
	That not a myth, watch what happens this season....
   
>    Myth:  Al Davis is a football genius.
>    Fact:  Al Davis needs to step up, aside or wherever he can to get out
>           of the way.  His day is past. Personally, I hope he stays.
 
	
	He has been voted for induction into the hall of fame and will
	make it in the next go around!! They don't let wana-bees into the
	hall!! The NFL would not be where it's at today with out this
	man!!!!! 
   
   
Any more trash to spew???

Monty
    

44.293STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu May 31 1990 16:068
    >    The Raiders are only a player or 2 from a better than .500
    >    season.  
                                            
    With the extra wild card added this year, a "just better than .500
    season" may be enough to get into the playoffs...
    
    
    py
44.295COMET::MONTGOMERYBlowin whin's again, film at 10Thu May 31 1990 16:3812
>      Yeah, where's my $20.00 you FFF'in welch?  You spew your trash,
 >    Steven
  
  come over to the FCC site some day and i'll have it for you....
 just keep your eye on the trees because we shoot donk fan's comin up the
road and then expose them to RAIDER films over here... We really don't test
for EMI/RFI this is the nerve center for re-education for those that favor
orange... ;^)


  

44.296CAM::WAYIt was a stanky thangThu May 31 1990 17:045
You've got to tell them... you've got to tell them...

Solyent Orange is Donk's fans...Solyent Orange is Donk's fans!!

Tell them.....
44.298Laugh of the dayCOMET::JACKSONTAPlay a mans sportThu May 31 1990 19:505
      Davis into the HOF?  Thats a joke, so this means that he will
    probably get in. What did he do that so spectacular besides waisting
    tax $$$$????
    
    		Tim
44.299RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOPasses everthing but a gas stationThu May 31 1990 19:5915
    Tim,
    
    Al Davis, despite his detractors, has been one of the most important
    figures in the history of professional sports.  He was the commissioner
    of the AFL, and is widely viewed as one of the people most responsible
    for the AFL/NFL merger (though Pete and the boys tried to cover
    it up, as much as possible).  Davis was instrumental in the growth
    of the old AFL, and despite the howls of Broncos fans, and others,
    has been the owner of one of the most successful franchises in the
    AFL, AFC, and NFL, a franchise that has  won 3 super bowls.
    
    While I haven't been too crazy about AL's recent dealings with moving
    the team, I can't argue with his contributions to pro football.
    
    JD
44.300FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu May 31 1990 20:1213
    The Raiders no longer have the all-time winning percentage in pro
    sports.  That honor belongs to the Boston Celtics.  I think the
    Canadiens and Yankees are close, the Lakers are close but I don't
    have all the data I need to figure them out.
    
    The Raiders through 1989 are 285-171-11 for a percent of .622. 
    Not including playoffs, the Celtics through this season were 2169-1226
    for a percentage of .639.  If playoffs are included, they are 2427-1399
    for a percentage of .634.
    
    JD, I agree with you about Al Davis.
    
    John
44.301WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Jun 01 1990 13:432
    ...so there!!
                                      Denny
44.302Dean's % much higher. Over .700!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jun 01 1990 14:270
44.303FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Jun 01 1990 14:577
    The only other teams above .600 are the Canadiens and Lakers, both
    around .610.  The only other team close is the Yankees, around .575.
    Cain't figure the Habs, Lakers and Yanks out exactly, since I don't
    have the last 3 years season records, but I don't think it matters
    much.
    
    John
44.304Al's SB % is .750 ! Dean's ???FRSBEE::BROOKSBy Any Means Neccessary - Any At AllFri Jun 01 1990 15:056
    re .302
    
    Al has won 3 Super Bowls and a AFL title. Dean has 1 championship
    (barely), and a host of Excellent Losses (tm)
    
    Nuff said !
44.305Bill Fischer greatest coach ever!? 1.000% in F4'sRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jun 01 1990 15:191
    
44.306I'm out of here!!!!COMET::MONTGOMERYTwo days till FreedomThu Jun 07 1990 12:2934
Well I guess this is as good a place as any!!!




I'm leavin DEC, yes folk's I took the buyout right after I got a call From
Uncle AL to work for the RAIDERS... Special Asst. in charge of Lunatics and
converting Donk's fan's to Americas Team!!! ;^)

I will miss you guy's!! That's about the only thing I'll miss about this 
place.... I'll keep in touch every now and then thru some other noters when
football season comes around... If any of you ever get to Colorado you can
find me at the Green Mountain Falls Fire Dept. about 25 miles from CX0...
I have a chance at a job at another Fire Dept. as a full timer and won't find
out for about a month...

So, Remember me when the RAIDERS beat your team and keep those Donk fans 
inline!!!

Later Monty


P.S.  There's a rumor that another RAIDERS fan is leaving us too!!!    
      Soory Carlos , you might be the only one left..


One other P.S.---  I want to thank Mr. Hendry for all that he has done with
                   giving us the fact's and stat's....
				Thank's John!!!!!

Monty



44.307enjoy the huntingCNTROL::CHILDSEat Me, Beat Me, C'mon Mistreat METhu Jun 07 1990 12:377
 Good luck Monty, I'm going to miss your unobjective analysis this football
 season... ;^) I'll try to pick up the slack and keep the donk fans inline...

 ;^)

mike
44.308POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Jun 07 1990 12:424
    Hope the job works out for you, Monty.  I'll keep an eye out
    along Ute Pass for a car plastered with FAIDER stickers.
    
    Cowboy
44.309FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu Jun 07 1990 13:045
    You're welcome Monty.  Seriously, good luck and we'll miss you.  
    If you ever have any Raiders questions or any other things that
    come up, relay them through Hoot and I'll be happy to answer them.
    
    John
44.310Good luck!SASE::SZABOThu Jun 07 1990 13:124
44.311GENRAL::WADEFear the govt. that fears your guns!Thu Jun 07 1990 13:4111
    Well MonteQue,
    
    	It's been real.....it's been fun.....AND it's been real fun
    	bashing with you.  Hold on to your burgers n buds!  Hopefully
    	them firepersons can get you converted from the dark side to
    	a Donk fan.  We could use another completely objective fan
    	like yerself... :^)
    
    	Adios..........
    
    Claybone
44.312MCIS1::DHAMELYa gotta aggregate yer SLOF's, manThu Jun 07 1990 13:446
    
    Best of luck and all that, Monty.  Hope the full-time fireman thing
    pans out, hoser.
    
    Dickster
    
44.313JULIET::MAY_BRQUIET!!Thu Jun 07 1990 13:516
    
    Hoot and Monty leaving at the same time?  Hmmmmm.
    
    Godd luck.
    
    Bruce
44.31415436::LEFEBVREHe lives in Mojave in a WinnebagoThu Jun 07 1990 13:573
    Rotsa ruck, Monty, and keep the anti's in line.
    
    Mark.
44.315WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu Jun 07 1990 13:583
       Good Luck Monty!
       Toad's leaving too.
                                       Denny
44.317C ya, Bye, Adios, Later Dude! Peace, Monty.CRBOSS::DERRYThu Jun 07 1990 14:001
    
44.318TOPDWN::METZGERDon't have a cow man...Thu Jun 07 1990 14:0711
Later MOnty...


 I'll miss talking knowlegeable 'merican football with ya...


 Too many anti-donks leaving ........


       Metz
44.319COBRA::DINSMOREMadonna and ASICS.. A WINNING COMBOThu Jun 07 1990 14:094
    good luck  monty..
    
    dinz
    
44.320COMET::MONTGOMERYTwo days till FreedomThu Jun 07 1990 14:1310
Oh Yeah!!!

Does anyone want to buy an FFL team????
The Colorado Sportsters are up for sale real cheap....
Division D FFL.....

Monty

    

44.321CAM::WAYBloomfield Brew CrewThu Jun 07 1990 14:2233
Monty --


Best of luck to you.  Take good care.

There's not one person in the entire world who has eaten smoke
that doesn't feel at one time or another that they want to do
it full time.  I am envious!

A couple of points to remember:

		1.  When rescuing pretty female victims, 
		    encourage them to let you do mouth-to-mouth
		    as that will allow you to keep your skills
		    current.

		2.  When you're up on the aerial, always try
		    to spit on the Chief's head...during the
		    confusion at a fire, he'll never know it
		    was you, and you'll feel good.

		3.  Ventilate a lot....it's easy work, and it
		    looks cool to people watching.

		4.  There are worse things to do in life than
		    hump hose.

		5.  Finally, the bestest tool in the whole world
		    for ventilation is a CHAINSAW!!!!!


Take care, dude,
'Saw
44.322REFINE::ASHENever trust a big butt &amp; a smileThu Jun 07 1990 14:305
    Later Mont-dude... like have a most excellent adventure chasing
    fires, man, say hi to that bodacious Darryl Hannah for me... whoops,
    wrong movie, gotta keep that nose clean...
    
    -Walt
44.323MCIS1::DHAMELYa gotta aggregate yer SLOF's, manThu Jun 07 1990 14:553
    
    And don't forget to clean your nozzle, too.
    
44.324And don't smoke too many butts!BUILD::MORGANThu Jun 07 1990 15:144
    Hey Monty, CONGRATS!  Hope everything works out with the new job.  This
    is depressing though, when hearing the anti's are bailing out.
    
    					Steve
44.325CSC32::J_HERNANDEZL.A. Dodgers '88 WORLD CHAMPIONSThu Jun 07 1990 16:135
    Congrats Monty, I just wish you'd have been around when the Rams kick
    the paRaiders (tm) out of L.A. and clean up that city once and for all. 
    
    
    the devil dog
44.326Does Cacti know?COMET::JACKSONTAPlay a mans sportThu Jun 07 1990 17:125
      Its been fun bashing at/with ya Monty.  Hope we can get you out to
    the field and play some ball again.  Good luck, and don't feel to bad
    about being a closet donk fan ^^^.
    
    	Tim
44.327GENRAL::GIBSONThu Jun 07 1990 17:5912
    
    Yep, I also got a new transmission (or something like that) and can't
    turn down the buyout. I don't have an exact date for the final day yet,
    sometime at the end of this month. Can't bitch. It's  been a great 13
    years. Because of DEC, I have had the opportunity to see some beautiful 
    country in New England and Colorado. I don't have anything definately
    lined up yet, one definate possibility though. I will be around here
    for a couple more weeks. Then I hope to take some time to go fishin'
    and see if I can get my limit of golfs.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.328POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Jun 07 1990 18:024
    Good luck out in the real world, HOOT.  Too bad you won't be
    here for the Donks season. ha
    
    Cowboy
44.32915436::LEFEBVREHe lives in Mojave in a WinnebagoThu Jun 07 1990 18:158
    Hoot, it was a pleasure to know ya.  Best of luck in all your
    endeavors.  If you mail me your home number, I'll look you up when
    I come back out to Colorado (probably in July).  Maybe we can do
    some fishin'.
    
    Keep your lines tight and your powder dry.
    
    Mark.
44.330GENRAL::WADEFear the govt. that fears your guns!Thu Jun 07 1990 18:176
    Transition 2, ::sports 0  :^(
    
    Hate to see you go Hooter.....who's gonna report on the antics
    of Gerald Perry now?
    
    Claybone
44.331RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOA knife,a fork,a bottle &amp; a corkThu Jun 07 1990 18:224
    Well, I guess I'm the only Raider fan left, HOOT, MOnty, GOod luck
    and I'll take up the slack preaching AL's word to the infidels.
    
    JD
44.332CAM::WAYBloomfield Brew CrewThu Jun 07 1990 18:2613
44.333Must be a Donk fan behind this. :-)CSC32::GL_JOHNSONWham Bam thank ya ma'am!Thu Jun 07 1990 18:3610
    
    	Later dayz and good luck HOOT and Monty.  Looks like JD, myself,
    and the rest of the RAIDER faithful will have to pick up the slack. 
    
    	Bashing the Donks just won't be the same without you guys. 
    
    
    
    					         Glen J.
    
44.334They're dropping like flies!WNDMLL::SCHNEIDERSay, who's the barber here?Thu Jun 07 1990 18:374
    You guys take care.  It was a pleasure meeting you.  If/when I make it
    there again, I'll make sure Cactus Jack rounds you guys up.
    
    Dan
44.335Et tu, Hoot?MCIS1::DHAMELYa gotta aggregate yer SLOF's, manThu Jun 07 1990 18:415
    
    All the best, Hoot.  Happy hunting.
    
    Dickster
    
44.337UPWARD::HEISERchild of the bluesThu Jun 07 1990 18:475
    Hoot, Monty, best of luck to both of you.  
    
    PNO has lost half of its population to the $$$.
    
    Mike
44.338GENRAL::GIBSONThu Jun 07 1990 18:4910
    
    If any of you make it out this way, I'm listed in the Colorado Springs
    phone book under David J. Gibson. I plan on sticking around here.
    
    Also, some of you will remember Todd Survil and Herve Church. They are
    both taking the buyout. Herve is moving to Portland, Ore. and Todd is
    staying here.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.339FSHQA2::AWASKOMThu Jun 07 1990 19:027
    Well, damn!
    
    Why is it the buyout always takes the good guys!
    
    Best of luck to both (all?) of you.
    
    A&W
44.340QUASER::JOHNSTONWHOA! Death by STEREO!Thu Jun 07 1990 19:3518
   Attention Hoot and the Parrot:

   	Hey guys.... I was just kiddin' when I said this town wasn't big
   enough for the three of us. ( Shheeeesh! )

   	When the Donks whup the Faiders up side the head (as per usual),
   whose corn flakes can I crap in if not yours?

   	Who else would have the lack of class to try to defend Uncle Al's
   (you know, the guy with 666 tatooed on his haid) braindead decisions.

   	In all seriositicity, I'll miss you guys. Even though we haven't
   met yet, stay in contact, through Jack. Are you having a going away at
   the Rock or the Dublin House?

   	Best of Luck, and keep the shiny side up.

   Mike JN
44.341Go get em !LUNER::BROOKSBy Any Means Neccessary - Any At AllThu Jun 07 1990 21:354
    Good luck and best wishes Monty ... I'll help pick up the Raider
    Gauntlet .....
    
    BTW, should I tell SPORTS that you are the real Darth Raider ?
44.342WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Jun 08 1990 09:493
       Good Luck to you HOOT! We're losing a lot of good people around
    here also. 
                                     Denny
44.343An Opinion....CAM::WAYBloomfield Brew CrewFri Jun 08 1990 10:4618
A quick aside not meant to start a rat hole:


	I agree wholeheartedly with A&W on the buyout taking
	all the good folks.

	I've seen more goldbrickers and goof-offs who get shuffled
	from project to project, never producing anything, but
	still on the payroll.  They have it so easy, they'd probably
	never take the buyout even if it was offered.  Heaven forbid
	the company should actually *fire* them for non-productivity!

	Yup, all the good ones get away, while the deadwood floats
	around clogging up the viaduct.


Thanks for letting me step on the soapbox for a few minutes,
Chainsaw
44.344BUILD::MORGANFri Jun 08 1990 10:568
    See ya Hoot.  Never met ya, but I will miss you and the Mont.  I'll
    look you guys up if I'm ever out there.  My wife has quite a bit of
    family that live in the Springs.  Good luck to ya.
    
    					Steve
    
    P.S. - Frank, the buyout seems to be working quite nicely up here in 
    Maynard.
44.345CSC32::J_HERNANDEZL.A. Dodgers '88 WORLD CHAMPIONSFri Jun 08 1990 11:016
    I was gonna start the Hoot and Monty going away party topic but I
    didn't figger anyone would show up. 
    
    
    Seriously, if any CS noters wanna go for some brews to wish the dearly
    depaarting well, then lets go for it.
44.346COMET::MONTGOMERYTwo days till FreedomFri Jun 08 1990 13:3019
Saw you slay me (tm)

Those were some great ideas!!! Can't wait to try the one out on the chief!!!

Thank's guy's  Will miss the hell out of all of you!! ;^(
Just won't be the same with out login into sports.....

All of you take care!!!


AND REMEMBER THAT THE RAIDERS ARE #1...............



Good luck to all
Monty.....



44.347POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipFri Jun 08 1990 13:354
>  AND REMEMBER THAT THE RAIDERS ARE #1...............
    
    
    Confused to the end, eh Monty?
44.348GENRAL::GIBSONFri Jun 08 1990 15:1110
    
    'Saw,
    People that were rated 1, 4 or 5 were not permitted to go on
    transition. I guess the theory was that they didn't want to lose
    water walkers or permit managers to dump their dirty laundry, so to
    speak, on someone else. They have to deal with their poor performers
    instead of just dumping them on someone else.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.349CAM::WAYBloomfield Brew CrewFri Jun 08 1990 15:549
Thanks HOOT, for the info.

At any rate, it's still too bad we won't have your's and Monty's
unique input in here anymore.

Best of luck, and if I ever get out that way, I'll be sure and
look you up!

'Saw
44.350byw byeCNTROL::CHILDSEat Me, Beat Me, C'mon Mistreat MEFri Jun 08 1990 17:219
 Good luck Hoot, sorry to see ya go it was fun agreeing with you and
 disagreeing with you the last few years. Enjoy your time off and good
 luck with the hunt....

 on the other stuff perhaps when Digital tighten it's belt again in 91
 the 4's and 5's will get the gate without a generous package?

 mike
44.351A sad time for SportsDECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Mon Jun 11 1990 09:0021
    Geez, this is really depressing.  I was out a few days last week,
    so I guess I missed giving my farewell to the Parrot.
    
    Hoot, I'm sure you'll be seeing him, so give him my best wishes
    please.
    
    As for you, it just won't be the same in here, particularly during
    football season.  Can you ask Uncle Al to hire-on another Deccie
    so we can continue to have inside info?  :*)
    
    Really, I'll miss your bullseyes on them Donk fans, especially Jack.
    I and other can shoot from afar, but you were able to get right
    on him.  
    
    Herve, Todd, Monty, Hoot.  Wow, this is really hard to believe,
    that all of you are leaving in the same timeframe.  It's depressing.
    
    So, before I get distracted, I want to wish all of you the very
    best in whatever you do and wherever you go.
    
    Lee
44.352WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Mon Jun 11 1990 09:403
       According to yesterday's Globe, the raiders are interested in Ken
    Sims.
                                         Denny
44.353It was fun jawing with youse guys. Good luck.AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers...Pants for |CENSORED|sMon Jun 11 1990 11:471
    
44.354GENRAL::GIBSONMon Jun 11 1990 13:219
    
    Will do, Lee. I finally am taking your suggestion from a few years
    back. I think I will go into a career of acrobatics. ha ha ha!
    
    RE: Simms
    I doubt if he would make the team, unless they traded some people away.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.355BEWARE THE ENTITYELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Jun 11 1990 14:1319
    
        Although DEC tried to remove these two undaunted RAIDER
    fans by offering them the dreaded package .... it's too late..
    ....infected by radioactive emissions from their CRT's, their
    individual spirits have merged into a single 'entity' living 
    somewhere in virtual memory space .... just waiting and
    watching for the Donks to choke against the RAIDERS again only
    to emerge in its new form ...... "MOOT".... Arrrghhhhhh!
    
        Seriously though, Hoot you're  an inspiration to all, and I'm sure
    God will meet your needs. Sorry I missed Monty, I was out last week,
    please give him my regards. Not to worry, as you just read the 'entity'
    will keep these lost donk fans in place, along with the rest of us 
    RAIDER faithful. If I'm ever up that way I'll let you buy me a brew,
    as it'll probably mean that I took the package too and am looking
    for work.
    
          						Carlos
                                                         
44.356Bye!BSS::G_MCINTOSHVom Hochland German ShepherdsMon Jun 11 1990 17:0116
    Losing Monty & Hoot is like:
    
    	(a)  A breath of fresh air.
    
    	(b)  Missing 2 of the Three Stooges.
    
    	(c)  The final blow for the Raiders contingent.
    
    	(d)  A paradox for Donk fans....whom now will they scream about.
    
    	(e)  All of the above.
    
    
    Best of luck.....it's been fun!
    
    Live from Charger Central.....Glenn
44.357I think I saw you in ::GRATEFULCRBOSS::DERRYTue Jun 12 1990 08:593
    Good luck and enjoy the show... so to speak.
    
    Take care, Hoot!
44.358WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Jun 12 1990 09:304
       Oakland mayor Liomel Wilson got hammered in the election lasted week
    (17% of the vote). He was a strong supporter of paying the extortion
    money to Al Davis.
                                              Denny
44.359DASXPS::KHARRISTue Jun 12 1990 10:1910
    In the USA Today , it has the Raiders sending a 4th round pick to
    the Rams for Greg Bell.
    
    Is there any news of the Raiders signing Doug Williams?? I know
    that they had him in camp a few weeks ago.
    
                                            Kenn
    
    BTW there are many of us in N.H. that wish we would get offered
    the package. Whats the package worth out there??
44.360GENRAL::GIBSONTue Jun 12 1990 19:2416
    
    Yep, that was me, Karen. Bob was here about a month ago. Played with
    Rob Wasserman. Grate show.
    
    
    Bell for a 4th, huh? That would be a nice insurance policy.
    
    Haven't heard anything concerning Williams. Maybe they could bring him 
    in to slaughter the donks twice a year. Nah, that's not necessary. The
    donks can't beat them anyway.
    
    It's official. My last day is the 25th. Get your licks in while you
    still can.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.361Great time of year to do it!!COMET::JACKSONTAPlay a mans sportTue Jun 12 1990 20:2511
      You too HOOT??   Even though I work in the same plant as you and have
    never met you,  I will miss bashing with/at ya!!
    
      Not to worry,  I will still verbally abuse the other Raider
    faithfuls, so good luck to ya, and hope you have better luck than I
    have had at catchin' that big Mackinaw, Kokanee, or Walleye.
    
    
    	Tim
    
      P.s.    Go DONKS!!!!!!
44.362HOOT, I've got your slack !EARRTH::BROOKSBy Any Means Neccessary - Any At AllTue Jun 12 1990 20:4213
    Hoot, who beat Wilson in the mayoral election ? Funny how things
    change - he was looking good a while back.
    
    ANyhow, I'm glad that the people of Oakland stood up to Davis, and
    showed that they had some sense of priorties.
    
    More importantly, I hope that other cities that are starving for
    a NFL team look at Oakland, and learn from it. I see no need to
    reward the imcompetence of a Bidwell, Irsay, or Tose by giving them
    that kind of extortion money.
    
    Hell, I wish I could tank my job, and have DEC reward me like that
    ... :-)
44.363DASXPS::KHARRISWed Jun 20 1990 08:494
    The Raiders got Greg Bell for an undisclosed draft choice. A good
    move for the Raiders.
    
                                  Kenn
44.364GENRAL::GIBSONWed Jun 20 1990 14:007
    
    Gotta be happy with that, eh Kenn? The original rumor was a 4th round
    pick. Must be one of those "depending on what he does, decides what the
    Rams get" kind of deals.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.365HAPPY AS A PIG IN SH*T!!!!!BOSOX::KHARRISWed Jun 20 1990 18:015
    To get a back of Bells caliber for an undisclosed draft choice sounds
    great to me. The Raiders backfield has been in disaray for the last
    year and a half maybe Bell can solidify things.
    
                                   Kenn
44.366DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Fri Jun 22 1990 14:404
    Hoot, since Monday is it for you, Best of luck, buddy.  Take care
    of yourself, and don't buy anything orange-colored!
    
    Lee
44.367AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampFri Jun 22 1990 14:563
    	Yeah take care HOOT.  It was fun *debating* with you.  8^)
    
    				/Don
44.368MCIS1::DHAMELThe world is a macrocosm of sportsFri Jun 22 1990 15:0310
    
    >    	Yeah take care HOOT.  It was fun *debating* with you.  8^)

    Hoot,
    
    To you in Col., I think that this can be said for all us
    Mass. debaters.
    
    Dickster
    
44.369REFINE::ASHEYou can touch THIS...Fri Jun 22 1990 15:093
    good luck Hoot-dude...
    
    -Walt
44.370Good Luck HootsieLUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceFri Jun 22 1990 15:161
    
44.371No one quite like ya Hoot.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jun 22 1990 16:2410
    You'll be missed Hoot.  But remember, ...
    
    
    
    TWENTY-ONE! TWENTY-ONE! TWENTY-ONE!
    
    ;^)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
44.372PTOECA::DEMOhelp, i'f falin and i cand ged uppFri Jun 22 1990 16:318
    Hoot:::
    
    donet led ure meet lofe an donet git caut wid ure banana waggin'
    
    reegaurds
    
    mi
    
44.373I give a HOOT ... Lotsof luck !LUNER::BROOKSHomie The Clown don't play that !Fri Jun 22 1990 17:121
    
44.374GENRAL::GIBSONFri Jun 22 1990 18:3912
    
    Thanks allot folks! I don't know if I will be able to get in here 
    Monday or not. I'll miss ya!
    
    
    On the RAIDER front...
    
    Tim Brown appeared to be fully recovered from his blown-out knee in
    mini-camp. He was running at full speed with no problems. 
    
                                                   HOOT
    
44.375PFSVAX::JACOBAlways eat ice cream after HOT ChiliFri Jun 22 1990 18:536
    I may be too late but Good luck and all the best to ya Hoot!!!!
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
44.376WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his Lips...Know New Taxes!!Fri Jun 22 1990 20:512
       Good Luck to ya again HOOT!!
                                       Denny
44.377The Return of the Evil Empirer!!!!!!DVF::FORGETThu Jul 05 1990 16:399
    
    
    
      I heard that Marcus Allen is still under signned.  Rookie Camp
    opens on the 15th & 22nd the veterans come in.
    
    
    
    Mike
44.378Alzado fighting for roster spotDECWET::BAKERPete Rose is InnocentThu Jul 05 1990 21:0714
I read in the last Sports Illustrated a article regarding Lyle's comeing
back to the Raiders.  After the spring drills one of the coachs said that
with the uniforms on you could not tell an age difference of the players 
out on the field.  Before camp opens the coach said that Lyle was propbably
#8 on the list, with only 7 that will make the team.  I really have a feeling 
that he will make it to at least the #5 spot by the end of camp.  Golic was 
making fun of the fact that he no longer feels like a old man (33 years) 
around the camp, he just looks around the room seeing all the baby faces then
he sees Lyle and gets to feeling good.

We shall see


Steve
44.379OOPS::MACGREGORFri Jul 06 1990 10:148
    Alzado announced his coming out of retirement during an airing of
    Arsenio Hall.  (This being about four months ago) He said that the
    owner (damn I forget his name) invited him to try out for the team.
    He claims that he is in better shape now, but not as strong, than
    he was during his previous stay.  He also plans, along with Art
    Shell, to bring back the tough image of the Raiders.
    
    The Wizard
44.380ELMAGO::CGRIEGOOne Nation Under GOD !!Fri Jul 13 1990 18:1416
    
           With the RAIDERS' ( -vs- Saints) first pre-season
    game only three weeks away I gotta say that I can hardly wait.
    It's been a long cold winter and I'm getting weak from a virus
    caused by an NFL deficiency. I think the Raiders have a good chance
    of taking the division title this year.  I anticipate Schroeder
    to come forth and re-assert himself as a top notch QB this year,
    and I agree with Wiz about the rest of the team getting back their
    mental and physical toughness brought back by Shell, Otis, and 
    Alzado (even if he never plays, just having him around the players 
    might rub off). Don Heineich's (you know, the inventor of the 
    Heineich Maneuver) '90' preview has the Raiders coming in around 
    the middle of the pack. But what does he know anyhow ?
    
    							Carlos
    
44.381GENRAL::WADEDaddy,whyaretheangelsbowlingsoloud?Fri Jul 13 1990 19:194
    	What lineup changes, if any, can we expect to see from
    	the Raiders this year?
    
    	Claybone
44.382here's oneCOOKIE::SIMONFri Jul 13 1990 20:283
    re: .-1
    
    You mean aside from Alzado? 8-)
44.383AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Mon Jul 16 1990 12:211
    I read that if the Raiders move back to Oakland, the A's will move out.
44.384RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOink a dinka doo, a dinka dooMon Jul 16 1990 12:595
    Whwere will the A's go, or should I say, where will Jose tell them
    they are allowed to move to....
    
    
    JD
44.385I'm Bart Raider, who the Shell are you?STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasMon Jul 16 1990 14:3721
    IMO, the two biggest things that hurt the Raiders last year:
    
    Penalties/mistakes.  I'm not referring to the occasional penalty for
    overaggressive play that any intense team will get, but more the
    "mental lapse" kind of error.  Like Golic getting called for jumping
    offside three times in one drive vs. New England.  Or the guy who tried
    to field a punt deep in his own end against the Giants and set the
    Raiders in a hole for most of the second half.  Or numerous overthrows
    of open receivers, or drops.  Shell did get this team playing with more
    intensity after he took over, but they now need to play with more
    discipline and better execution.
    
    Inability to win on the road.  The Raiders sole win away from LA last
    year was at the Meadowlands vs. the Jets.
    
    How far the Raiders go this year will depend on how much they improve
    in the above two areas.
    
    
    py
                                    
44.386A few positive lineup changesICS::VPAPIATue Jul 17 1990 11:147
    
    	Tim Brown will be back returning punts, Ron Brown is supposed
    to move back to defensive back (where he played in college) also
    Max Montoya should be starting in the OL.
    
    
    Vinny
44.387Other changesELMAGO::CGRIEGOOne Nation Under GOD !!Wed Jul 18 1990 20:0119
     
        You might also see James FitzPatrick, T,(a 300 lb. plan B'er
    from San Diego) on the offensive line, Greg Bell, RB from L.A.,
    Elvis Patterson, DB, also from San Diego,
    Pro Bowl free safety Vann McElroy will also return, he missed most
    of last year with a hamstring injury. 
        Last year the Raiders finished 19th out of 28 in total offense
    (9th in rushing and 25th passing) and 10th in total defense (16th
    against the rush and 5th against the pass). The return of Tim Brown
    should help their hurting passing game a little but they still need
    help at QB. The rushing game should be excellent this year with
    the addition of Bell. Likewise the return of McElroy should help
    the defensive running game considerably as well as the defensive
    passing game, and Ron Brown will be given a look at cornerback,
    a position he played at Arizona State. Elvis Patterson may also
    help in press coverages.
    
    							Carlos
     
44.388still will be under .500COMET::JACKSONTAIMjustTHEsameASyouIDOtheBESTiCANWed Jul 18 1990 20:396
      Having T. Brown returning punts will help the Faiders, but all the
    rest will not.
    
      Also,  I thought McElroy was cut last year???
    
    		Tim
44.389No pass rush is the main problemICS::VPAPIAThu Jul 19 1990 10:158
    
    	Ron Brown,Greg Bell and Max Montoya won't help? I find that hard 
    to believe. Arron Wallace has signed so he should help at LB and also
    getting to the QB which if the Raiders don't do you could be right
    about being under .500.
    
    
    Vinny
44.390GENRAL::WADEDaddy,whyaretheangelsbowlingsoloud?Thu Jul 19 1990 12:538
    Carlos,
    
    	Looks like they made some good acquisitions (except Elvis
    	"Toast" Patterson).  Having McElroy back should help them
    	out too.  They still need somebody to *step up* and play
    	QB.......
    
    Claybone
44.391BOSOX::KHARRISThu Jul 19 1990 16:1114
    Tim Brown isn't set in the plans for special teams this year. One
    of the reasons Ron Brown was probably signed is to replace Brown
    on special teams. Greg Bell and Max Montoya were steals! A big key
    is if the Raiders can stay healthy this year. Aaron Wallace should
    have a good chance at starting for the Raiders at OLB this year.
    
    The division looks to be tight from top to bottom. I look for San
    Diego to surprise a lot of people this year. With the exception
    of Denver every team in this division has questions at QB.
    Heres hoping that the Raiders kick but all year long!!
    
                                              Kenn
    
    BTW: Schroeder signed a 1 year 1 million dollar contract yesterday.
44.392ELMAGO::CGRIEGOOne Nation Under GOD !!Fri Jul 20 1990 12:1311
        Beuerlein and No. 1 draft pick Anthony Smith are already
    holdouts. Beuerlein who started 7 games and made $140,000 last
    year is seeking something close to the $1 million Jay Schroeder
    signed for this week. Marcus Allen and Greg Townsend are also
    considered possible holdouts. 
        I can't believe Schroeder got $1 mill., although I do think
    he has the potential to be a great QB, I would have waited until
    he performed like a million dollar player first. As for Beurerlein,
    he's dreaming.
    
    Carlos
44.393FRSBEE::BROOKSDrexler,ZinaGarrison,DrMFri Jul 20 1990 18:545
    What happened with the Phantom Raider Doug Williams ? Last I heard,
    the Raiders asked him to come to a try-out, he was very impresssive
    (according to Art Shell), and I've heard nothing since.
    
    I bet Schroeder would *love* that .... :-)
44.394WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his Lips...Know New Taxes!!Mon Jul 23 1990 09:564
       Remember Nonty telling us Uncle Al would have to be brain dead to
    have Alzado in camp? Well, guess who's in camp! Someone remind the
    parrot of this if you see him.
                                             Denny
44.395PARVAX::WARDLEImpeach Jim Florio...NOW!Mon Jul 23 1990 11:004
    What good would "One Game Doug" Williams do for the Faiders? Face it
    Doc, he's not worthy of an NFL starting job.
    
    JoJ
44.396ELMAGO::CGRIEGOOne Nation Under GOD !!Mon Jul 23 1990 11:455
        Seems to me that the Raiders picked up an old washed out QB
    not to long ago, that ended up taking them to the Superbowl and
    winning it.
    
    Carlos
44.397Or shall we call him Kenny The Quiche ?EARRTH::BROOKSI could drop Tyson like a bad habit!Mon Jul 23 1990 12:025
    Wardle, if Doug is One Game .... what the hell is K-K-Kenny ?
    
    "No Show" O'Brian ???
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA !!!!!!!!!!!!!
44.398EARRTH::BROOKSI could drop Tyson like a bad habit!Mon Jul 23 1990 12:035
    Carlos .... that QB won not one, but TWO SB's for the Raiders ....
    
    And let's not forget how the Raiders picked up a QB who was considered
    washed up by the Oilers at the age of 37 ... fella by the name of
    Blanda .....
44.399PARVAX::WARDLEImpeach Jim Florio...NOW!Mon Jul 23 1990 13:5316
    While it's true that Plunket and Blanda did the job for the Raiders,
    it's no reason to assume that One_Game_Doug can do the same. 
    
    He had a great SB, but then again, so did Phil Simms. I'd say Simms is
    the better of the two based on reasonable consistency over the past few
    years. Williams has never proven that he can win consistently....
    
    re: O'Brien
    
    Hey Doc, what does Kenny have to do with this? Why is it that whenever
    you can't back up your argument you change the subject?
    
    I'm still waiting for you to tell me the NFL scouts were wrong about
    Harris....
    
    JoJ
44.400Poor 'ol JayNSDC::SIMPSONFile Under 'Common Knowledge'Tue Jul 24 1990 06:144
Maybe he's been signed up to haunt Schroeder - lightning doesn't strike
twice... does it?!

Steve :-)
44.401ELMAGO::CGRIEGOOne Nation Under GOD !!Tue Jul 24 1990 12:035
       First round draft choice Anthony Smith agreed to terms yesterday
    morning and reported to camp in time to practice with the team.
    
    Carlos
    
44.402OOPS::MACGREGORTue Jul 24 1990 14:443
    What were the terms to which Anthony Smith signed?
    
    The Wizard
44.403Your outta hereCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanWed Jul 25 1990 18:341
      Has Alzado callapsed on the field yet?
44.404ELMAGO::CGRIEGOOne Nation Under GOD !!Fri Jul 27 1990 12:1915
        Don,t know about the terms of Smith's contract or Alzado's
    status either, but the Raiders and the Saints will be leaving for
    London on Sunday, where they will workout daily against each other
    and then play on the following weekend. Saints head coach Jim Mora
    said he never thinks about Bobby Hebert and doesn't think a game
    against the Raiders in London will promote a trade for the disgruntled
    quarterback. Hebert has said he has played his last down for the
    Saints, and the Raiders have been mentioned regularly as a team
    that might be interested in a trade for Hebert. Also read in the
    paper that Marcus Allen's status with the team is still in limbo,
    meaning that Al Davis still hasn't made up his mind if he wants
    Allen back.
    
    Carlos     
    
44.405SolutionAIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentFri Jul 27 1990 15:481
    Bobby Hebert for Brian Shaw.  Straight up.
44.406Al DavisDVF::FORGETMon Jul 30 1990 12:077
    
    
    
      I read over the weekend that Marcus Allen has been signed.
    
    
    Mike
44.407Possible TradeBOSOX::KHARRISMon Jul 30 1990 13:049
    In the Boston Globe Sunday it reported that Marcus did sign. It
    was also reported that The Raiders and the Rams are talking about
    a trade that would involve Marcus goin from the Raiders in return
    they will get Kevin Greene a dominating pass rushing LB. I think
    they were just part of a package deal. I cant see the Raiders going
    after Hebert because he doesn't have that strong of an arm, but
    who knows.
    
                                               KENN
44.408QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Mon Jul 30 1990 13:247
   The Raiders should have talked to Indiannapolis.

   They could have traded Marcus to the Colts for Eric Dickerson, three
   starters, and eleven draft choices (those Irsay dudes really know how
   to deal, don't they?)

   Mike JN
44.409Another 7-9 seasonCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Jul 31 1990 18:024
      The RAms would be stupid to give up Greene for an old runnin' back. 
    Marcus had his great days, but now he seems to play hurt every year.
    
    	 Tim
44.410USRCV1::COLOTTIRLittle Homer Simpson in all of usWed Aug 01 1990 12:065
    Alzado went down with a knee injury and will require surgery.
    
    
    			Raider_Rich
    
44.411ELMAGO::CGRIEGOAbortionPolitely=KillingtheUnbornWed Aug 01 1990 12:385
       That's bad knews, I was kinda looking forward to seeing that
    old timer mop the field with Mr. Ed. Is he expected to return after
    he recovers and if so how long will it be.
    
    Carlos
44.412Nice try LyleCSC32::SALZERWed Aug 01 1990 16:407
    Sorry to hear about the knee. Alzado would be lucky he could
    clean the locker room with mop let alone a field with Elway. It's
    probably in his overall best intrest to get the injury now rather
    than later when somebody gonna' really screw him up. This entire
    comeback is a farce. Meanwhile back to reality......
    
    BoB
44.413;')LUDWIG::JAMESWed Aug 01 1990 21:273
    Is this a career ending injury???
    
                               Steve J.
44.414What a jokeSHALOT::MEDVIDmuscle and hateThu Aug 02 1990 09:526
    It may not be a career-ending injury, but it's a Raider season-ending
    injury.  Afterall, he was single-handedly going to bring back the
    "Raider Tradition."  Now what are they gonna do, ask Jack Tatum to come
    back and paralyze somebody?
    
    	--dan'l
44.415Thats a JokeDASXPS::KHARRISThu Aug 02 1990 12:376
    I really don't think that Tatum was trying to paralyze Stingley.
    Although the game was during the preseason and the hit was not really
    called for, there have been dirtier hits in the league since Tatum
    and Stingley.
    
                                       Kenn
44.416COBRA::DINSMOREwhats your claim to fame.?Thu Aug 02 1990 12:585
    no offense guys, but is this gonna turn into one of those debates
    again on that matter?
    
    dinz
    
44.417Tatum epitomized the Raiders and Davis -> ClasslessSHALOT::MEDVIDmuscle and hateThu Aug 02 1990 13:0414
    I didn't mean to imply that Tatum's hit was intentional.  However,
    Tatum was a classless football player (and there have been others).  He
    didn't even bother to contact Stingly after the incident.  Stingly was
    very hurt by this.  I remember him on Monday night football saying so. 
    
    That's an image that will live in me forever.  Here's a guy who is
    paralyzed and his career is over and his biggest question is not self
    pitty as to why this happened to him; the question he asks is why hasn't
    the guy who did this to him even bothered to say anything.
    
    Then later on, Tatum writes a book calling himself an assassin.  Real
    nice rub there.
    
    	--dan'l
44.418Now we get knocked FOR talking sportsSHALOT::MEDVIDmuscle and hateThu Aug 02 1990 13:1410
    RE.416
    
    Sorry.  Only being in this conference since February I haven't read all
    400+ replies in here yet.
    
    I'll shut up now.  I stated my opinions in .417
    
    
    	--dan'l
    
44.419diNz + Atlantic City boardwalk = soaring world population :-) SASE::SZABOThu Aug 02 1990 13:239
    Don't take it personally, Flip.  :-)  This particular arguement has
    gone through probably every version of ::SPORTS since its beginning,
    and ol' dINz is a ::SPORTS old-timer, that's why the knock.  And you'll
    have to excuse ol' diNz cause he needs a memorablelabia(tm) real bad
    and cain't wait till the weekend of the 25th.....  :-)
    
    Hope this helps.
    
    Hawk
44.420It IS an ugly rathole/debate without resolution.VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Thu Aug 02 1990 13:350
44.421DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Aug 02 1990 13:5014
    Somehow, it can't be the same rathole without Hoot and Monty, who
    were the main defenders of Tatum, the cheap-shot artist.
    
    But, I'll let it drop.  No need to take cheap-shots at the king
    of the cheap-shots.  
    
    Also, it would be classless of me to make any further comment about
    Tatum's lack of class.
    
    Dinz, you sure are desperate for something to type about, now that
    your Yankmees are deadmeat!  And George, too.  Is Donbo's career
    over?
    
    Lee
44.422no debate just an oppinionDASXPS::KHARRISThu Aug 02 1990 14:0310
    I agree. I wasn't trying to debate, I was stating my oppinion.
    
    Getting back to the present Raiders, they just signed T Bruce Davis,
    a former Raider, to a contract. I don't understand why they aren't
    showing any interest in Majkowski. If they drafted a quarterback
    #1 in the draft it would cost them what Majkowski wants.
    
    Sorry about the previous topic.
    
                                       Kenn
44.423ELMAGO::CGRIEGOAbortionPolitely=KillingtheUnbornThu Aug 02 1990 14:473
      Is Majik available ???
    
    Carlos
44.424COBRA::DINSMOREwhats your claim to fame.?Thu Aug 02 1990 14:549
    gentleman,
    
    i wasnt knocking anyone. just trying to make a point
    
    
    hawk,
    
    youre  right about the boardwalk..
    
44.425CSC32::SALZERThu Aug 02 1990 17:0013
    The Raiders have been unsettled at qb since Plunkett left. 
    That's been a long time now. You can't have a winning team
    without a qulaity winning qb. Do you see the parallel here?
    
    Of course Al being the brilliant football mind that he is,
    seems to ignore the fact of the matter. He'd rather bring in
    a 40+ year old DE and get as much press as he can out of 12th
    round qb pick. Grandstanding and talking about that 
    "old Raider tradition" will do little to improve their position,
    at least for this season.
    
    BoB
     
44.426mr. ed benched in favor of KubiakCNTROL::CHILDSNo One Here gets Out AliveThu Aug 02 1990 17:0710
  Boy the Donk fans are certainly boistorous now that Hoot and Monty aren't
  here to keep them in line...  ;^)

  just remember How many broncos does it take change a flat tire?

  one, unless it's a blowout then they all showup....

  mike     

44.427He's Available To Some DegreeDASXPS::KHARRISThu Aug 02 1990 17:2111
    Carlos,
    
                          Green Bay gave Majkowski til' this Saturday
    to try and negotiate a deal with another team. Howevr it is believed
    that if any team offers Majik a contract then G.B. will then match
    the offer and everyone will be happy. 
    
                                           Kenn
    
    Except of course the team that got used a bargaining tool.
    
44.428USRCV1::COLOTTIRLittle Homer Simpson in all of usThu Aug 02 1990 17:379
    re. 44.416
    
    > no offense guys...
    
    Unless the Raiders pull a trade for a decent QB, the you cant use the
    word "offense" in this note anymore :-)
    
    			Raider_Rich
    
44.429CSC32::SALZERThu Aug 02 1990 17:449
    No Mike. We're not getting boisterous but we do need to get 
    a feel for where the 'new' Raider fans are coming from. 
    Without Hoot and Monty in here I could count on anything
    from a flinch to slam. We will get each other figured out in
    time. Opening day has Denver vs LARads. It's a rivalry that goes
    way back. Win or loose, neither team could ask for a better
    opponent to open with. 
    
    BoB
44.430He's currently in London preparing for N.O.CSC32::GL_JOHNSONMo' Better BluesThu Aug 02 1990 19:298
    
    	Former CU all-Big 8 defensive tackle Arthur Walker, a rookie
    free agent with the RAIDERS, has been cleared of first degree 
    sexual assualt charges in Lincoln, NE.  Walker's genetic tests did 
    not match evidence in the case.
    
    						 glen j.
    
44.431RAIDER FAN STUCK IN PATRIOTS LANDWMOIS::E_FASSETTFri Aug 03 1990 12:3010
    <<44.429  A FEEL FOR WHERE THE 'NEW' RAIDER FANS ARE COMING FROM>>
    
    I AM NEW TO THE NOTES CONF. AND ALTHOUGH I HAVE BEEN READING A LOT OF
    NOTES IN THIS SUBJECT, THIS IS MY FIRST REPLY. I AM A DIE-HARD RAIDER
    FAN THAT IS STUCK IN NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS LAND. AS THE SEASON GOES ON
    I WILL BE REPLYING IN THIS NOTE MORE OFTEN. I CANNOT ROOT FOR A TEAM
    LIKE THE PATRIOTS, AND LIVING IN PATRIOTS TERRITORY I TAKE CONSTANT
    ABUSE FROM PATRIOT FANS FOR ROOTING FOR THE GREATEST FOOTBALL TEAM
    IN THE WORLD.
    LONG LIVE AL DAVIS AND THE SILVER AND BLACK!!!
44.432WilkommenCAM::WAYShrooms, for the ride of your lifeFri Aug 03 1990 12:3410
Welcome aboard.

One friendly little hint:  Using all upper case is considered shouting
in notes.  Unless you've got one of those ancient terminals w/o
lower case, take you caps lock off.

Have fun, with Hoot and Monty gone, the Raiders need all the support
they can get in here...

'Saw (who's a Giants fan)
44.433WMOIS::JBARROWSTake it as it comesFri Aug 03 1990 13:013
    Eddie...........it's about time you finally joined us!
    
    
44.434TGIFCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanFri Aug 03 1990 19:261
      He won't last long after the abuse from us Faider haters...
44.435LA LA LA BABY!!!CSC32::LATOURFri Aug 03 1990 19:3820
    
    Any word on how lyle a. is doing.......Raiders need all the help they
    can get this year to try and stay out of the seller in there division
    so old Bro. Al won't feel so Bad about the Bad Choice he made to pay
    some shell shocked QB a million bucks to start...Ha ha ha ha.
    
    
    Drewski
    
    P.S. It's been a while since I've been in notes, and so sorry Hoot and 
         Monty are gone I hate that they will be missing out on the bashing
         you Raider Fans are gona this year. But I must admitt They knew
         how to Bust on us Bronco Fans pretty good. To them I say Good 
         wishes and Good-bye. And to the Raider Fans still here I say
         " LET THE GAMES BEGIN SO WE CAN BUST ON YO RAIDER HEAD "
    
    
    
    
    
44.436ELMAGO::CGRIEGOAbortionPolitely=KillingtheUnbornFri Aug 03 1990 20:2111
      Welcome, Eddie
      
      Don't listen to a word these crazy knuckle-heads are saying
    about us or the Raiders taking a bashing cause the only one taking
    a bashing this year is old horse face himself. Which brings up an
    interesting point, have you ever noticed how Bronc fans after a
    while start to take on the characteristics of Elway, like walking
    around with that stupid Elway grin on their face....Ok Ok calm down
      ..... I was just trifling with your giblets.                 
                             
    Carlos
44.437Faider Stew!!!!CSC32::LATOURFri Aug 03 1990 20:5211
    
    Carlos,
    
     Crazy, knuckle-head, Raiders, Bashing, Old Face, Stupid,
     Trifling Giblets. Sounds like Faider Stew to me. Mmmmmmmmm Good.
     
    
     Drewski
    
    
    
44.438RAIDERS FAN TILL THE END!!!WMOIS::E_FASSETTMon Aug 06 1990 12:299
    Hope that all those DONK fans don't choke on that good old "RAIDER
    STEW". Especially after the first game of the season when AL and the
    boys stuff it down Elway's throat. Of course that is if there is any
    room left after the meal of "CHOKE STEW" that the 49ers fed BOY ELWAY
    last january.
    
    takin up HOOT and MONTY'S slack with the SILVER and BLACK
    
    EDDIE F. 
44.439RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBuzzed by the Blue Angels....Mon Aug 06 1990 13:1612
    re Dan'l,
    
    ON Tatum/Stingley - in John Madden's books, he states how Tatum
    wanted to see Stingley, but Stingley's family wouldn't allow it.
    Madden, BTW, was the first non-family member to visit Darryl.
    
    The Tatum as unfeeling animal was pertuated by the Boston media,
    and picked up in other places, such as Pittsburgh, where Tatum is
    often blamed for the hit on Lynn Swann, which was in fact administered
    by George Atkinson.  
    
    JD
44.440And I'm a Raiders fanBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 73 to goMon Aug 06 1990 14:3211
    Thinking of this from Stingley's side of the coin.  Picture yourself
    as just being paralyzed for life.  Tatum wanted to see him while he
    was still in the hospital recovering.  It's easily understandable to
    see how Stingley may not have wanted to talk to the guy who just turned
    his life upside down.  Maybe he was just not emotionally ready for it at 
    the time.  I believe Tatum went to see him within a week of the
    accident.  Stingley's beef (and he has publicly stated he has a beef,
    so it's not a story perpetuated by the Boston media) may be that Tatum 
    never attempted to talk to him after the initial rejection.
    
    					Steve
44.441STAR::YANKOWSKASHelp Jane, stop this crazy thing!Mon Aug 06 1990 14:499
    re .439 (JD) on John Madden:
    
    Stingley was on WBZ's "People Are Talking" show a few years back --
    Darryl said that Madden was not only the first non-family member to see
    him, but that Madden saw him often and still keeps in close touch with
    him.
    
    
    py
44.442DASXPS::KHARRISMon Aug 06 1990 15:0511
    Well the first preseason game is over and the Raiders are 0-1. There
    were some positives that came out of this game for both teams however.
    Some of the plusses for the Raiders; Anthony Smith & Aaron Wallace
    (1st & 2nd rnd. picks) were in the Saints backfield often in the
    2nd half. Greg Bell was running extremely well. The offensive line
    gave both Evans and Schroeder plenty of time. Dennis Price did a
    good job of pass coverage. Overall all the Raiders defense played
    very well except for Ron Brown and Torin Dorn on pass coverage.
    However both Dorn and Brown are both projects at the corner.
    
                                               Kenn
44.444C'mon, Johnny, spit out the apple..USRCV1::COLOTTIRLittle Homer Simpson in all of usMon Aug 06 1990 16:275
    I've been hearing about Raider Stew, but I think we will all be hearing
    about horseburgers pretty soon, right Bronco fans :-)
    
    			Raider_Rich
    
44.445Touche'CSC32::SALZERMon Aug 06 1990 16:4411
    Gets to sounding like a broken record in the various team files
    in here.  Every time this particular team or that particular team
    is about to play Denver, they start harping what their going
    to do to Elway. 'We're gonna do this and we're gonna do that to 
    to him'  These are the same people that bash the guy's record
    and yet they still have a perfect grasp to his importance to 
    the team.  They also realize they have a far better chance to loose
    with him in there.  Bring on the Raider's and THEIR million
    dollar qb.
    
    BoB
44.446ELMAGO::CGRIEGOAbortionPolitely=KillingtheUnbornMon Aug 06 1990 16:4812
    Dang! I was sure the Raiders were gonna slaughter the Saints, oh
    well I guess like Kenn said, their was some good things coming out
    of this game, and its still only pre-season. The defense should
    be alot better this year, Wallace and Smith are sure to make an impact. 
    Plus youv'e gotta hand it to "Toast" for keeping the Raiders in
    it until the very last play, which for some strange reason seems
    to be one of the Raiders' trademarks. Schroeder on the other hand
    still needs some work, and you can't blame it all on Schroeder,
    cause there were a couple of dropped passes that were catchable.
    All in all though it went well for a preseason opener.
    
    Carlos 
44.447did jack write a book?SHIRE::FINEUC1Tue Aug 07 1990 04:4214
re .439 and others

Hey JD,

Didn't Tatum write a book?  

I'm sure that I read Tatum somewhere quoted as saying that all he wanted to
do was "hurt anyone that came down his side."  I thought his feeling was that
as long as he didn't hit dirty it was OK...

Having said that I've seen him try and push quite a few Adam's Apples out the
other side with that forearm of his.

rick ellis
44.448Raiders need work...YUPPY::STRAGEDCLEAVAGE is a man's breast friendTue Aug 07 1990 06:1314
    As a witness to the American Bowl at Wembley last SUnday, I can report
    that the Raiders have a lot of work to do if they are going to contend
    this year.  They looked slow and ineffective against the short pass.
    The best show by a QB was Vince Evans (Schroeder and Beulerlein
    sipped) until the final 5 minutes when he made two elementary
    mistakes...(see my review of the game in topic titled 'American Bowl
    '90 - I forget what number it is).
    
    Yeah, I know its only pre-season, but Shell has got a lot of work to
    do.  Marcus, Bo and Lyle can't win the game on their own.
    
    Your foreign correspondent,
    
    PJ
44.449COBRA::DINSMOREaustin goober.smile, enjoy the world.Tue Aug 07 1990 09:237
    EVANS  could strp and be the starter.. if the raiders wanna play
    run and gun style football
    
    
    
    dinz
    
44.450that should say stepCOBRA::DINSMOREaustin goober.smile, enjoy the world.Tue Aug 07 1990 09:241
    
44.451Too Many MistakesDECXPS::KHARRISTue Aug 07 1990 10:3619
    Evans makes too many mistakes to be a starter for anyboday. I don't
    even like him as a back-up QB. He consistently throw into coverage,
    and thats after hanging on to the ball for 5 minutes. Schroeder
    is a much better QB than Evans, and I'm sure they'll sign Buerline
    before the season starts. 
    
    I agree that the Raiders had problems covering the short passes,
    but swing passes to backs and dump offs to the TE have killed the
    Raiders for years. Maybe Wallace can help in that aspect along with
    his pass rush.
    
    The Raiders have excess defensive lineman, when Townsend signs,
    and they should deal someone for some help other places, ie.
    OL,LB,S.
    
    With the exception of the play at QB, I think alot more positives
    than negatives came out of this game.
    
                                            Kenn
44.452?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansTue Aug 07 1990 12:259
      Re. .448
      (Schroeder and Beuerlein sipped)
    
    I didn't even see Beuerlein play?
                          
    The Raiders play San Fran this Saturday, on CBS, should be a good
    game.
    
    Carlos
44.453STAR::YANKOWSKASHelp Jane, stop this crazy thing!Tue Aug 07 1990 12:316
    re .452:
    
    What is the starting time of Saturday's Raiders-SF game?
    
    
    py    
44.454Hope this helpsELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansTue Aug 07 1990 13:478
    
    The time on the schedule I have is set for 9:00, unfortunately it
    doesn't specify if thats A.M. or P.M. ( my guess is P.M. ), or
    what time zone ?? Although the game is being played in Calif. so
    I'm assuming it's Pacific Time.
    
    Carlos
    
44.455OOPS::MACGREGORTue Aug 07 1990 14:406
    RE: time of game
    
    No way is it 9:00 PM Pacific Time.  I'd bet it's 9:00 AM Pacific
    Time (12:00 EST).  That makes some sense.
    
    The Wizard
44.456maybe it's 9 PM Eastern time?STAR::YANKOWSKASHelp Jane, stop this crazy thing!Tue Aug 07 1990 14:411
    
44.457DASXPS::KHARRISTue Aug 07 1990 16:265
    The preseason schedule that I have says the game starts at 9:00pm
    Eastern time.
    
                           Kenn 
    
44.458EARRTH::BROOKSGot to get some ghetto heaven ...Wed Aug 08 1990 12:2813
    Evans does make some pretty basic mistakes, which will probably keep
    him from being a serious contender for teh starting job. On the other
    hand, he has the strong arm, is mobile, and makes good decisions on the
    run.
    
    FWIW, I think Schroeder should be the #1 man, but he has really
    regressed from his level in Washington. Why ? Is his confidence totally
    shot ? Or was 85-86 a fluke, and a result of being with the perfect
    team ?
    
    Man, that Lachey trade looks worse every day ....
    
    Doc
44.459BOSOX::KHARRISWed Aug 08 1990 14:0312
    Schroeder looks more and more every day like he was the beneficiary
    of playing behind a great offensive line. Although I like Schroeder,
    my patience is starting to wear thin. He looks terrible on his short
    passes unless it's an out pattern. Buerline doesn't look like the
    answer either because he seems to have trouble throwing the bomb
    which is a key part of the Raider offense.
    
    With the addition of Montoya from Cincinnati, maybe the line will
    be stable enough for Schroeder to stand in the pocket and find his
    receivers.
    
                                             Kenn
44.460Another QB disputeCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanWed Aug 08 1990 15:004
      Did Montoya even play this weekend?  I didn't notice.  Your faiders
    still need a QB and thats all there is to it.  Each QB has his certain
    qualities, but not enough all around ones to take them anywhere.
    		Tj
44.461DASXPS::KHARRISWed Aug 08 1990 16:1311
    Montoya played in the 2nd half. Wisnewski was moved to left guard
    so Montoya could slide into the right guard slot. If Mike White,
    the new QB coach from Illinois, can help Schroeder out with his
    mechanics he should be alright, not great but good. 
    
    I'm not like most Raider fans in the aspect that I feel that Elway
    is in the top 3 QB's in the league. You must give someone credit
    when credit is due and Elway has led the Broncos to 3 Super Bowls.
    
                                         
                                    Kenn
44.462Marino would look great in silver and black!CRUISE::JBONINJohn Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBAWed Aug 08 1990 17:094
    Is Marino still trying to get out of Miami?
    
    
    John
44.463ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansWed Aug 08 1990 18:557
    
       The NFL's fastest man competition was held last Sunday, and the
    RAIDERS have the distinct pleasure of claiming the two fastest men
    in the NFL. Ron Brown was blowing everybody away, the only one to
    even come close to Brown was Willy Gault in the final round.
                                      
    Carlos
44.464How about D. Sanders?CRUISE::JBONINJohn Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBAThu Aug 09 1990 12:045
    I thought Deion was one of the fastest. At least he is in baseball.
    Was he in the competition?
    
    
    John
44.465ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansThu Aug 09 1990 12:546
    
       No neon, I don't think he participated, also some guy named Daryl
    Green that plays with the Redskins didn't participate (he's won it 
    like the last 2 or 3 years in a row).
    
    Carlos
44.466could explain Deion's absenceAIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentThu Aug 09 1990 12:571
    Any $ involved in this?
44.467I'll take it.KEPNUT::DIGGINSThu Aug 09 1990 14:576
    
    $25K to the winner.
    
    
    
    Steve
44.4681-1BOSOX::KHARRISMon Aug 13 1990 09:0517
    Well it wasn't pretty bu the Raiders beat the 49ers 23-13. Schroeder
    looked fairly decent and the defense played real well during the
    first half. A must for the Raiders is to get Steve Smith back in
    camp. Vince Evans proved once again why he is just a back up by
    coming in and throwing an interception immediately. How long does
    it take someone to learn how to read a defense. Aaron Wallace once
    again played a solid game and looks to be earning himself a starting
    spot at OLB.
    
    Along with Smith, they also need to sign Greg Townsend. They need
    his pass rush. Does anyone know what the story is with Terry McDaniel?
    I have not seen him in either preseason game and have not seen his
    name on the holdout list. Getting Buerline into camp would be a
    wise decision at this point as well considering that Evans proves
    game in and game out that he's a stiff.
    
                                                Kenn
44.469OOPS::MACGREGORMon Aug 13 1990 10:2516
    I saw most of the game and here are some thoughts.  The score wasn't
    very indicative of what happened.  San Fransisco turned the ball
    over 4 times in the first half leading to a 20-0 halftime lead for
    the Raiders.  Schroeder was consistently off the mark.  Sometimes
    he threw long, sometimes he threw short.  Even the TD throw was
    off target as the receiver had to stop and let the ball catch up,
    luckily he had a huge jump on the defender.
    
    I feel the defense is coming of age finally.  They really seemed
    into the game, starting small fights, etc.  However, they always
    seem to have an UP game against a good team.
    
    Not that I partically like Buerline (horrible redition of spelling)
    , but I think he is better than Schroeder.
    
    The Wizard
44.470CAM::WAYTake FiveMon Aug 13 1990 11:189
What's the story on Vince Evans?

I was watching the telecast and saw him play, then racked my
brain for a day and a half trying to figure out where I might
have heard of him....

Any help would be appreciated...

'Saw
44.471FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Aug 13 1990 11:434
    Vince Evans is a former USC QB who has bounced around the NFL and
    played for the Bears before Jim McMahon got there.
    
    John
44.472CAM::WAYTake FiveMon Aug 13 1990 12:255
Thanks John.

Phew, does that relieve a few brains cells....

'Saw
44.473DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Mon Aug 13 1990 13:343
    I thought he played Ben Casey on TV.
    
    Lee
44.474CSC32::SALZERHand me the pliers.Mon Aug 13 1990 19:465
    Evans was also the starting qb for the Raiders during the 
    scab season several years back. He did rather well in those 
    games and has been in the wings for the Raiders since.
    
    BoB
44.475ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansTue Aug 14 1990 17:5112
    
      Saturday, Aug. 18th the Raiders go against the Cowboys in their
    third pre-season game. The Raiders are coming off a convincing win 
    against the defending Superbowl champs  ... in the 49'ers defense,
    it was only their first game of the season while the Raiders have
    the benefit of an extra game ... and it is still only preseason 
    football. In support of the Raiders, there defense shut down Montana
    (1st quarter) and Young for the rest of the game.
    
    Carlos
    
     
44.476Smith Signs!BOSOX::KHARRISWed Aug 15 1990 09:543
    The Raiders signed Steve Smith,FB, yesterday.
    
                                 Kenn
44.477Hammer time!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansWed Aug 15 1990 13:5726
    
    	Did anybody catch Alzado on that new program with Maria Shriver,
    called "On the Cutting Edge" or something like that. He looks like
    he's in great shape, and he seems like he's got a good attitude
    and lots of confidence in himself. Although I think that "neurological
    muscle re-educator" or whatever he called himself is a joke, along
    with that other knucklehead hypnotist thats replaying tapes of Alzado
    back in his greatness, and yelling things at Lyle like "GOTTA GET
    THE QUARTERBACK!" and junk like that. I don't know what makes Lyle
    think he needs that stuff now, he did'nt need it before, and he
    was one of the baddest. Alzado hurt his knee in training camp and
    under went arthroscopic, but he hopes to be ready to go for the
    first game. Raiders coaches indicated that he had a realistic chance
    of making the team. Recently, the former 49'er coach, Walsh was
    asked if he thought Alzado had a chance in his comeback attempt,
    he felt that this was a farce and unrealistic because of the injury
    factor, that is as you get older its easier to get injured, takes
    longer to heal, and as a result your always healing from injuries
    instead of playing. Makes sense, but then again if Alzado was only
    interested in doing things that make sense he would never have
    attempted this to begin with. Either way I hope to see him back
    for as long as his old bones will carry him, or at least 'til he
    bodyslams Elway a few times. 8)
    
    Carlos
                                                                 
44.478LAGUNA::MAY_BRWed Aug 15 1990 14:177
    re -1
    
    Remember that Walsh was never one to keep players around past their
    prime.  I doubt any player on the Niners while Walsh was there was ever
    accused of being over the hill.
    
    Bruce
44.479QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Aug 15 1990 14:408
   Lyle is still very well liked in Denver.
   He was always a good player... lotta fire... take no crap.
   He was also very unselfish with his time, money, and energy in work
   for the community. He was well respected.
   If this is what he wants, I hope he makes good, and doesn't suffer any
   injuries that'll nag for the rest of his life.

   Mike JN
44.481MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Wed Aug 15 1990 14:469
    
    I saw that show, and it boggles the mind that a guy of that size,
    and in obvious great shape, is considered too old or too weak or
    too slow for the game.
    
    Does Maria Shriver have a thing for big guys with muscles or what?
    
    Dickster
    
44.482Lyle Alzado is a con manHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThank you, FayWed Aug 15 1990 14:491
    
44.483ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansWed Aug 15 1990 15:0811
    
    RE:481
    
    > Does Maria Shriver have a thing for big guys with muscles or what?
    
    That and bald women.....
    
    
    
    
    Carlos
44.484GOOBER::ROSSMrT - Sports SpyWed Aug 15 1990 15:3911
>            <<< Note 44.482 by HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER "Thank you, Fay" >>>
>                         -< Lyle Alzado is a con man >-

You mean it didn't bring a lump to your throat when he talked about
how his father's lack of interest in him drove him to be what he is today?

You mean you didn't believe his "NO WAY!" to the steroids question?

You mean you thought he was serious about wishing he could thrash the cop?

If the NFL didn't exist, Lyle Alzado would be known only as "Prisoner #4545474"
44.485CSC32::SALZERHand me the pliers.Wed Aug 15 1990 15:417
    I don't recall Lyle's stats. I do believe that even in his prime 
    he was not considered big. Speed was good. It was intensity and
    drive that carried him.  The game has changed considerably since.
    He's probably going to end up badly injured if they go ahead with
    this plan. Walsh is on the money here. 
    
    BoB
44.486How About A Coach?BOSOX::KHARRISWed Aug 15 1990 16:106
    If he wants to come back, let him come back as a coach. The Raiders
    DL with, Long ,Townsend, Golic, Davis, Pickel, Wise and Smith is
    a solid group and there is not enough time for them to play as it
    is. They don't need any more bodies at DL.
    
                                     Kenn
44.488I guess size really doesn't matter ..... :-)EARRTH::BROOKSDowhatchalike, NoteHowYaLike ....Wed Aug 15 1990 17:0620
    
    
    re .481

>    Does Maria Shriver have a thing for big guys with muscles or what?
 
    Probably. Monday, I saw her on the Arsenio Hall show, and Arsenio
    asked her the same question. Then Maria made a mistake - she answered
    honestly :
    
    Shriver's reply :  "Well, yes. Arnold was the smallest I had."
       
    Hmmmmm ........   :-)
    
    Needless to say, Arsenio just let that hang out there, and he and half the
    audience just about died before Maria realized what she had said.
    
    Too funny !  
   
    Doc 
44.489COBRA::DINSMOREgo tigers!Wed Aug 15 1990 17:083
    
    brings a whole new meaning to the world needledik [tm]
    
44.490Team LeaderDENVER::HITEWed Aug 15 1990 17:122
    Lyle is still well-liked in Denver.  He was a charismatic team leader
    on the '77 Superbowl Team.
44.491the score would have been 45-10 insteadCNTROL::CHILDSNo One Here gets Out AliveWed Aug 15 1990 17:179
    Lyle is still well-liked in Denver.  He was a charismatic team leader
    on the '77 Superbowl Team.
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 oh you mean the team that almost made a game out of it with Morton at the
 helm? too bad they didn't have the "Duke" back then....

mike   
44.493Lyle's Cinderella TeamDENVER::HITEWed Aug 15 1990 21:008
    re: -491
    
    There are a lot of jokes at the expense of the Broncos' inability to
    win a Superbowl.  As a Broncos fan, I can accept that.
    
    But there is nothing that can diminish the excitement we all felt when
    the Broncos "Cinderella" Team went to the '77 Superbowl.  So your
    remarks were inappropriate, in my opinion.
44.494make that 62-10....CNTROL::CHILDSNo One Here gets Out AliveThu Aug 16 1990 09:0417
Thanks Steven and your shirt is in my closet waiting to be delievered...

Mr. or Mrs. Hite (hard to tell without you signing out) First off after you've
been in here a while you will realize that I take any and all oppurtunities
I can to knock the Broncos some of us feel it our duty to balance off the
craziness of Broncomania..

Secondly in my best Hoot and Monty caraciture the Broncos should have never
been to the bowl. It was painfully obvious that the camera missed Red Miller
paying off the refs on the oakland fumble near the goalline. A practice
which of course he partook in all year long as Denver got more calls that
year than Magic got airtime when he pulled his hammy in 88.....

;^) <-  this means I'm smiling having a good one...

mike
44.495RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONice sandcastle....Thu Aug 16 1990 12:3811
    Mike,
    
    Anyone with half a brain (which of course, excludes all donkey fans),
    knows that Lytle coughed the ball up and the raiders had and were
    rumbling down the field. Except the "Clemson" refs (orange, ya know)
    whistled the ball dead.  Perhaps the worst call in the history of
    the playoffs.  Raiders would have won game and whipped the Sowboys
    in the playoffs, and Tom Landry would rightfully be taking his
    ill-gotten genius label and sitting nexted to Reeves and Grant...
    
    JD
44.4968852::BROWNThu Aug 16 1990 13:2413
    
    re JD
    
       Seeing how Tom Landry happens to have won the third most games
    in league history has nothing to do with his genius label I suppose.
    Why can't you guys that got stomped on all those year's accept that
    the man knew the game better than most of all the other so called
    coaches put together. 20 straight years of Playoffs, and 5 NFC championships
    IMBO place the man in a class of only a few.
    
    Jerry Jones go eat Jimmy Johnson' shorts
    
    CADZILLA 
44.497CAM::WAYI wanna be an Airborne Ranger...Thu Aug 16 1990 13:3314
The *only* saving grace that Tom Landry has is the fact that
he once played for the Giants..... 8^) 8^) 8^)

Also, while Landry ranks up there, he couldn't even begin to think
about carrying Lombardi's jock.

Lombardi, IMHO, was the greatest coach the NFL has ever seen.  Not
only did he breed success on the football field, but most of his
players have turned into huge successes in their personal lives.
It was truly unfortunate that Lombardi was taken from us before
we had a chance to see the ultimate pinaccle of his abilities
achieved...

'Saw
44.4988852::BROWNThu Aug 16 1990 13:5817
    
    re Saw
    
    	What you may not remember is that Lombardi and Landry coached
    the Giants at the same time. Both left in 1960, and both went on the
    build winning programs. During the mid 60's both had turned those
    programs around and found great pleasure in playing one another 
    in the Championship series. The Ice Bowl is just one case of the
    two pitting two great teams against each other. I agree Lombardi
    died much to early to achieve his rightful place in NFL history.
    
    
    Cadzilla
    
    
    OBTW  that jock carrying non-sense does not go off any better than it
    did when Larry Holmes spit it out the first time.  
44.499LAGUNA::MAY_BRThu Aug 16 1990 14:108
    
    The Raiders have sold less than 20,000 season tickets so far this
    year.  Even with a good walk-up crowd the Coliseum is going to look
    empty.  If the Raiders get off to a slow start, things will look very
    bad.  Looks like Al screwed himself by trying to work all these deals
    with different cities.
    
    Bruce
44.5003rd?CRUISE::JBONINJohn Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBAThu Aug 16 1990 14:427
    re: .496
    
    Third? I thought Shula and Landry were see-sawing the lead a couple of
    years back. Did someone pass Landry? Chuck Noll maybe?
    
    
    John
44.501Lugging the Jock a SPORTS tradition....CAM::WAYI wanna be an Airborne Ranger...Thu Aug 16 1990 15:1624
re Cadzilla:

	Granted.  I have a lot of respect for Landry, but I liked
	Lombardi better...

re the Jock Carrying stuff:


	[Aside:  why oh why do I always have to explain everything to
	 the cherries?]

	The "carrying the jock" comment is a SPORTS tradition.  Just
	as is trademarking a neat expression.

	To debate people's relative greatness, and not have a least
	one jock carrying comment is, well, unSPORTSmanlike.

	Breathe deep the redolent aroma of OURGNG::SPORTS.  Learn
	the traditions.  Never questions them.  These my son are
	the commandments of SPORTS 8^)


later,
'Saw
44.503LAGUNA::MAY_BRThu Aug 16 1990 15:2810
    
    Stevie_boy,
    
    Easier Goer could easily handle the jock on Man o' War.  They all weigh
    within 5-10 pound of each other, and if one is especially light they
    just put extra weight in the saddle, anyway.  I mean., it not like
    you'd have to worry about Billy Shoemaker porking out and getting up to
    125 pounds or anything.
    
    Bruce  
44.504FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu Aug 16 1990 15:3612
    The answer to winning coaches will be posted tomorrow however, I
    believe Shula is now number 2 after George Halas and Landry is still
    number 3.  Landry was head coach of the Cowboys from 1960 - 1988 but
    the 'Boys didn't win a game during his first season, I believe they
    went 0-11-1.  Shula took over as coach of the Colts in 1963 when Weeb
    Ewbank went to the Jets.  Landry had been a head coach only two years
    longer than Shula and in one of those years went winless, so they've
    probably coached roughly an equal number of games.  It won't be Noll
    because he's been a head coach roughly 10 years less than the other two
    and Pittsburgh has had some awful seasons under him, too.
    
    John
44.505MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Thu Aug 16 1990 15:3713
    
    >	[Aside:  why oh why do I always have to explain everything to
    >	 the cherries?]
    
     
    We know the job is the pits, but it's also in your job description
    on page 6. [see Fruits; cherries, explanations].  It's right after
    the section on [Fungus; halugeonic, distribution].  RTFM, willya.
    
    It's also your job because you're so good at it.
    
    Dickster
    
44.506CAM::WAYI wanna be an Airborne Ranger...Thu Aug 16 1990 15:441
Dickster....I've been properly chastised... but I'm still rolling...
44.507Carry this jock, jack8852::BROWNThu Aug 16 1990 16:1312
    
    
    re: 'Saw
    
    
    	So as you say it's tradition.  You couldn't carry the jock of an
    Airborne Ranger.
    
    
    Cadzilla
    
    former Redstone Ranger 
44.508That's the spirit, CadzMCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Thu Aug 16 1990 16:232
    
    
44.509FSHQA1::AWASKOMThu Aug 16 1990 16:407
    Dick -
    
    *Now* I know why I've had so much trouble with the Sprots Manual.
    
    It's in reverse alphabetical order :-) :-)
    
    A&W
44.510Ooo-rah!CAM::WAYI wanna be an Airborne Ranger...Thu Aug 16 1990 16:4415
re Airborne Rangers:

	Yeah, you're right.  But actually I wouldn't try.

	My family's tradition lies either in the Marine Corps (Semper
	Fi), or on the High Seas.

	Actually, if I ever had to go in (and I'm getting kind of old
	so it would have to be something pretty drastic to get them
	to call the old guys like me) I'd try my damndest to follow
	in my father's footsteps and get into subs...

	My uncle was the Leatherneck...

'Saw (Who's always ready even though he's getting older by the minute)
44.511RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONice sandcastle....Thu Aug 16 1990 17:117
    Yo Cadz,
    
    I was defending the honour of the Raiders, and berating the Donks.
     A time-honored tradition in here.   And Landry was 2-3 in Super
    Bowls.  Lombardi was 2-0.
    
    JD
44.512MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Thu Aug 16 1990 17:126
    
    That's right, A&W, I had a helluva time finding the SPROTS manual
    in the library, too. ;^)
    
    Dickster
    
44.513MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Thu Aug 16 1990 17:197
    
    What a coincidence, 'Saw.  My old man was into subs, too. Had a
    little shop and he sold a lot of pizza's, too.  And my mother, the
    soprano, spent a lot of time on the high C's also.
    
    Dickster
    
44.514Silver and Black plz come back8852::BROWNThu Aug 16 1990 17:2721
    
    JD
    
        You can dump on them donks all you want. I'll be glad to get in
    line when it comes to bashin mr ed and them gawd awful donkey's. Even
    though Dan'l Reeves looks like my brother and caries my mothers ( I
    hope we're not related) family name.
    
      As far as the Raiders are concerned. I'll be glad when Al can find
    another George Blanda/Daryl Lamonica combo to run that bunch. The
    Silver and Black have been lacking a signal caller for some time now.
    Not since the Snake moved to the Earler's have they had a chance in the
    AFC west.
    
    	Bring back Big Ben ,the Mad Stork, Otis Sistrunk and Freddie
    "Sticky Hands" Billitnecough Sp.
    
    Cadzilla
     
    
    
44.516Bronco will win West this year boysCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanThu Aug 16 1990 17:337
      Didn't Plunkett take the faiders to the bowl & win it??  Grant it, he
    was no great, but he got the job done once in a blue one.
    
       The chargers will be better than the la/oakland/sacremento faiders
    this year.
    
    		Tim
44.517RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONice sandcastle....Thu Aug 16 1990 17:3413
    Alright Cadz,
    
    See HOOT and Monty, the two RAIDER fans who kept the Donks in check,
    took the buyout.  So, its up to fairminded, upstanding, outstanding,
    patriotic, good-looking souls like you, Mike Childs, and myself,
    to try and fill the rather large shoes of HOOT and the Parrot.
    
    We're just the guys to do it, too!
    
    Art Shell announced that Schroeder is the starting QB, since Buerlein
    is still holding out.   
    
    JD
44.518CAM::WAY1/2000 @ f2 Thu Aug 16 1990 17:3721
Hey Cadz, you mention some great football names there.

The Snake...a lefty, and the name described him well.

Bilitnikof...they said he wasn't fast enough, but his quickness
and moves made him one of the all time leading receivers...

Blanda...every man over 40 felt like he was reborn in light of
the accomplishments of Blanda on Sunday afternoons...

Boy, do those names take me back....

And hey, wasn't Ben Davidson one of the scariest things you've
ever seen when he'd be all decked out in the black uniform....

Yowza!

'Saw

PS Dickster...we call them Grinders down here... does that mean your
   father worked in a machine shop?
44.519MCIS1::DHAMELGreatest dog &amp; pony show on earthThu Aug 16 1990 17:506
    
    Sheesh...'Grinders'....Hoagies....Heroes.... gimme a summarine sanwich
    and a tonic for lunch any day.
    
    Dickster
    
44.520Oh not again 9er's 99 donks 2 8852::BROWNThu Aug 16 1990 17:5917
    
    
    re:516
    
      Lets hope not, can't take another year of listing to how they got 
    blown out in the Stupid Bowl again. This whole state sits around
    and mope's for about three months after each of these contest's
    of the have's vs the have not's.  
    
      Of course mr ed is trying to learn the touch pass this year, probably
    get him touched for a few more Int's. 
    
    But I do have to admit it is  fun watching them  dump on the Clowns from
    clevescum.     Yap! Yap! Yap!
    
    Cadzilla                     
     
44.521Plunkett was QB in '81 and '84.CSC32::GL_JOHNSONThe Fire Next TimeThu Aug 16 1990 20:5819
    
    	The Bro..er Donks winning the West this year?  What a joke. 
    Against Sheattle(tm) and the Dolts, they looked like they'll be the 
    same lucky bunch that they were last year.  They made no significant
    moves via draft, while the rest of the division, except the Shehawks,
    will catch up them.  Not that they have that far to go.
    
    	I'm not even worried about the Donkeys this year as far as the 
    AFC West is concerned.  The first game of the season will be in 
    Oakland.  Al just doesn't want to let the cat out of the bag.  The
    Donks will probably get beat up on the way inside the staduim, then
    get steamrolled on the field.  If you think Dennis Smith was burned
    by Jerry Rice, wait till you see what Brown and Gault will do to him.
    Like they used to say back in the '60s, speed kills.  The RAIDER D
    will hit Elway into the turf so hard, he'll end up in Tokyo again.
    
    	The real comp in the division will come from KC.  
    
    						 glen j.
44.522c'mon GlennsterUPWARD::HEISERboycott hell!Thu Aug 16 1990 22:505
    Re: -1
    
    Broncs are playing in Oakland this year?
    
    Mike
44.523AID-ERS......CSC32::LATOURThu Aug 16 1990 23:009
    
      Hey, Glen with all the talk about the Aid-ers moving are you sure
    Art will know which stadium to take his team. Ha Ha Ha ha ha ha...
    
    And Beat Goes on,etc.....................
    
    Drewski
    
    
44.524CSC32::GL_JOHNSONThe Fire Next TimeFri Aug 17 1990 00:227
    re: Mike H.
    
    Sept. 8   Donks @RAIDERS.
    
    	Trust me.  It will be at the Alameda-County Coliseum.  
    
    						 glen j.
44.525OURGNG::RIGGENBurley from bikingFri Aug 17 1990 01:3510
    Offense in the AFC west is owned by DENVER. 
    Defense will be owned by S.D 
    
    The Bronco's will win the west
    San Diego 2nd
    Faiders 3rd they will lead the league in points scored.
    KC will finish 4th and lead the lead in a single back offense.
    Seattle will wish that they could play Dallas 4-5 times.
    
    Jeff
44.526DECXPS::KHARRISFri Aug 17 1990 10:132
    The Raiders released Mike Haynes yesterday.
    
44.527FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Aug 17 1990 10:4146
    For all you Raider fans, Fred Biletnikoff is their receivers coach.
    
    All time winning coaches:
    
    George Halas	325
    Don Shula		286
    Tom Landry		270
    Curly Lambeau	229  (Early Packer teams)
    Chuck Noll		193
    Paul Brown		170
    Bud Grant		168
    Chuck Knox		163
    Steve Owen		153 (Long time Giants coach)
    Hank Stram		136
    Weeb Ewbank		134
    Sid Gillman		123
    George Allen	118
    Don Coryell		114
    John Madden		112
    Buddy Parker	107 (coached Lions to 3 titles in fifties)
    Vince Lombardi	105
    Bill Walsh		102
    
    The only active coach with 90 wins is Joe Gibbs.  A decent season will
    put him over the 100 mark.  Reeves is in the low eighties and Mike
    Ditka has 79.
    
    Shula is 60 and if he coaches for 5-6 more years should pass Halas as
    the all-time leader.  Noll is 58.  He should get to 200 this year, has
    an excellent chance of catching Lambeau and has a very slim shot at
    catching Landry.  Knox will probably max out at about 200.  Shula fits
    the profile perfectly for being an all-time leader because he started
    when he was relatively young (33) and stepped into a great situation
    right away.  Noll started when he was 38 and had two dreadful years
    when he started out.  Landry became a head coach at 36 (he's 66 now)
    and also had a couple of bad years starting out.  George Halas owned
    the team and was Bears coach 3-4 different times.  I don't see any
    other active coach getting 200 wins, either.
    
    In terms of winning percentage, Lombardi is first with .740 and he only
    coached for 10 years.  Madden is second at .733, George Allen is 3rd
    with .681 and Shula and Halas are both in the mid-600s.  Noll and
    Landry are both roughly the same in the .580 range.
    
    John
    
44.528FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Aug 17 1990 10:4414
    Some other notes:
    
    Shula, Noll and Walsh all worked for Paul Brown.  None of Lombardi's
    assistants or former players were ever notable successes as head
    coaches.
    
    Lombardi became a head coach at 45 which makes his success even more
    remarkable.  That must have been some Giants staff with him as
    offensive coordinator and Landry as defensive coordinator.  Lombardi
    was a true New Yorker because he played at Fordham, coached high school
    ball in Northern New Jersey and was an assistant at Army under Earl
    Blaik before joining the Giants.
    
    John
44.529Miami will be back on top in the east!CRUISE::JBONINJohn Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBAFri Aug 17 1990 10:529
    re: .527
    
    Ok, I remember the see-saw battle was for the most wins of an "active"
    coach. Anyone think Shula will take the record in 4-5 years?
    
    
    I think so.
    
    John
44.530CAM::WAY1/2000 @ f2 Fri Aug 17 1990 11:459
RE Lombardi:

	I'd highly recommend reading Lombardi's "Run to Daylight".
	An amazing book about his coaching technique etc.

	Again, a tragic loss.  If he'd coached for a few more years
	he'd undoubtedly be much much closer to the top of that list.

'Saw
44.531stubborn sobSHIRE::FINEUC1Fri Aug 17 1990 12:1619
>>RE Lombardi:

Frank,

Somehow, I think we've been through this before, but FWIW Jerry Kramer also
edited a book about Lombardi published after his death called "Winning is
the Only Thing".

If you're into mushy old anecdotes as I am as well as a single source which
spans his entire career, this is a dandy.  Some of the stuff he pulled off
when he was younger was amazing!!

Here's one I recall:
Once when he was doubling as basketball coach at St. Cecilia or St. Mary's
the other team threw a zone at them.  Determined not to lose but at a loss as
to what to do, Vince had his two guards pass the ball back and forth for the 
WHOLE LAST TWO QUARTERS!  Final score 3-2 for you-know-who!

rick ellis
44.532And the lightbulb went off ...SHALOT::HUNTWyld Stallyns RulesFri Aug 17 1990 12:219
44.533CX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackFri Aug 17 1990 14:1549
    
>    	The Bro..er Donks winning the West this year?  What a joke. 
>    Against Sheattle(tm) and the Dolts, they looked like they'll be the 
>    same lucky bunch that they were last year.  They made no significant
>    moves via draft, while the rest of the division, except the Shehawks,
>    will catch up them.  Not that they have that far to go.
>    
>    	I'm not even worried about the Donkeys this year as far as the 
>    AFC West is concerned.  The first game of the season will be in 
>    Oakland.  Al just doesn't want to let the cat out of the bag.  The
>    Donks will probably get beat up on the way inside the staduim, then
>    get steamrolled on the field.  If you think Dennis Smith was burned
>    by Jerry Rice, wait till you see what Brown and Gault will do to him.
>     

   It's obvious a few points need to be made here:

--Denver's offense has been using the ball control offense with great efficiency
  in their first 2 games, and it will only get better.  Bobby Humphrey has been 
  having an excellent camp and promises to be better than last year.  Denver has
  an excellent group of receivers, and don't forget about Mr. 3rd down, Steve
  Sewell.

--With Fletcher and Mecklenberg as outside 'backers, opposing QB's (Schroeder
  in particular) will be running for their lives.  Fletcher is one of the 
  league's most under-rated linebackers.  They have one of the best safety 
  tandems in the league in Smith & Atwater, and if either goes down, 
  Montgomery is ready to step in and start.

--Brown and Gault shouldn't scare anyone.  Gault may beat you deep, but he 
  doesn't have the hands.  Brown has been over-rated since his days at Notre
  Shame.  Marcus has definitely lost a step, and Bo was doggin' it for the last
  couple of games last year.  Will it be the incumbent Schroeder, incumbent
  Buerlein, or incumbent Evans at QB?

--Faider fans and everyone else can joke all day about the Broncos' Super 
  Bowl blowouts, but the fact of the matter is Denver is one of the league's
  most solid teams and among the favorites to win the AFC title...again.  This
  team was not beaten soundly until the Super Bowl last year, and that blowout
  only gave Denver more incentive for this year.  Everyone expects them to
  bury their heads in the sand, but it's just not going to happen. Sorry guys.

Doesn't matter if it's Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, Irwindale, or anywhere
else, the Raiders will get their clocks cleaned on opening day.

Can't wait for September 9th!!


Joe
44.535"REAL FOOTBALL PLAYERS WEAR SILVER AND BLACK"WMOIS::E_FASSETTFri Aug 17 1990 14:5922
    >Faider fans and everyone else can joke all day about the DONKS' Super
    >BLOWOUTS,but the fact of the matter is Denver is one of the league's
    >most solid teams and among the favorites to win the AFC title...again.
    >This team was not beaten soundly until the Super Bowl last year, and
    >that BLOWOUT only gave Denver more incentive or this year. Everyone 
    >expects them to bury their heads in the sand, but it's just not going
    >to happen.Sorry guys .
    
    >Doesn't matter if it's Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, Irwindale, or
    >anywhere else, the Raiders will get their clocks cleaned on opening
    >day.
    
    The fact remains that the DONKS did get blown out of the Super Bowl
    AGAIN!!! But take heart DONK FANS, even the RAIDERS lost their first 
    Super Bowl before winning their next three SUPER BOWLS!!! As far as
    being solid, well JELLO is considered a solid,(see JOHN ELWAY for true
    meaning of JELLO). The DONKS should actually bury their heads in the 
    sand after last years Super Bowl. So be it Los Angeles, Oakland,
    Sacramento, Irwindale, or any SANDLOT FIELD OR ALLEY, the Donks are
    going to find out THAT REAL FOOTBALL PLAYERS WEAR SILVER AND BLACK!!!
    
    The beginning of the end for the DONKS and their fans- September 9th!!! 
44.536Lets Get SeriousDECXPS::KHARRISFri Aug 17 1990 14:5921
    I agree with you about Gault having no hands, BUT Tim Brown is
    over-rated?? I really don't think so. In his rookie year he was
    by far the best KR in football! As for his receiving abilities he
    caught just about everything that has been thrown to him. If you
    want to talk about over-rated look no further than your own team
    and find the name RICKEY NATIEL. He always gets the press clippings
    saying how great he's gonna be and then he turns in yet another
    stiff performance.
    
    I'm not gonna rip the Broncos just becuase I don't like them. I
    also feel that Fletcher, Mecklenberg, Atwater, Humphries and Elway
    are great players, however I don't feel that Denver has a superior
    team compared to the Raiders.
    
    McDaniel & Washington make a very good corner tandem. Aaron Wallace
    looks like he's gonna step right in at OLB. Their DL is great.
    Wisnewski anchors an OL that is improving, and Bell, Marcus, Smith
    and Bo make the best back field in football next to Houston.
    
                                        Kenn
                     
44.537RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONice sandcastle....Fri Aug 17 1990 15:0615
    Kenn,
    
    You have to understand that Joe is a Miami disco-dancer/prancer
    I don't go to classes Hurrican fan, so automatically anyone who
    went to Notre Dame is overrated.  ND has had its share of overrated
    players, just as Miami has.  Talent is talent, and it makes no
    difference where it came from, ND, Miami, OSU, Long Beach state.
    Tim Brown is a talent.  
    
    The Donks have  the most overrated players in football, now that
    's a fack.  It starts with Elway and goes through Hecklerburger,
    Humphries, the 3 amigas and their coach.
    
    SMASH THE PUMPKIN (tm)
    JD
44.538STAR::YANKOWSKASHelp Jane, stop this crazy thing!Fri Aug 17 1990 15:139
    Which Brown (Ron or Tim) is going to be returning kicks for the Raiders
    this year?
    
    I'll agree 100% with whoever it was that said Steve Smith is an
    underrated back...in last year's game vs. the Patriots, New England
    didn't do a bad job of containing Bo but Smith had a field day.
    
    
    py 
44.539CSC32::SALZERHand me the pliers.Fri Aug 17 1990 15:2511
    1990 final standings AFC West standings.
    
    Denver     11-5
    KC          9-7
    LA          8-8
    SD          8-8
    Seattle     7-9
    
    Raiders may end up in 4th if San Diego can trun it around this year.
    
    BoB
44.540DASXPS::KHARRISFri Aug 17 1990 17:4111
    Tim Brown will never return another kick for the Raiders again after
    last year. Although Ron Brown seems like the logical choice, the
    Raiders have been using Stefon Adams and Jamie Holland in the
    pre-season.I really don't think Ron Brown has a chance to make the
    team as a DB so he better volunteer to return kicks.
    
    Isn't it too bad that such Raider greats like Haynes, Hayes &
    Christensen Had to be cut instead of leaving football willingly.
    However we can thank Shanahan for cutting Millen.
    
                          Kenn
44.541Too bad about Haynes.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansFri Aug 17 1990 18:0226
    
    RE: .539
    
>    1990 final standings AFC West standings.
>    
>    Denver    11-5 
>    KC         9-7
>    LA         8-8
>    SD         8-8
>    Seattle    7-9
    
    Sorry Charlie, but I'm afraid theres a flaw in your system.
    It was more like this:
    
      Denver    11-5
      KC         8-7-1
      LA         8-8
      Seattle    7-9
      SD         6-10
    
                      
    Carlos
    
    
    
    
44.542CX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackFri Aug 17 1990 18:283
    I think that was a prediction for this year.
    
    Joe
44.543RSST6::RIGGENBurley from bikingFri Aug 17 1990 19:0316
   
 <   Sorry Charlie, but I'm afraid theres a flaw in your system.
 <   It was more like this:
 <   
 <     Denver    11-5
 <     KC         8-7-1
 <     LA         8-8
 <     Seattle    7-9
 <     SD         6-10
 <   
 <                     
 <   Carlos
    
Just another typical Raider Fan Living on his teams past glory (8-8) 

Jeff
44.544Don't mean a thing if you ain't got that ring!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansSat Aug 18 1990 12:0616
    
    Woops, sorry BoB, didn't realize .539 was a prediction for this
    year. I thought you were showing last years standings and saying
    if SD could turn it around the Raiders might end up in 4th.
    
    re: Jeff
    > Just another typical Raider Fan living on his teams past glory
    > (8-8) 
    
    Just another typical Donk crybaby, whose team unlike the: Raiders,
    Bears, 49'ers, Steelers, Cowboys, etc...etc....have no past glory
    (or much of a future for that matter) to live upon. (55-10)
    
    Carlos
                                                
    
44.545CSC32::SALZERHand me the pliers.Sat Aug 18 1990 17:1818
    The Raiders are a strange organization indeed.  Seems anytime that
    people sit and talk about great teams present and past, you hear
    about the Packers, the Steelers and 49'ers.  If the Raider's name
    comes up at all, it is basically a footnote type of comment.
    
    A while back the big hype from the fans was "The Raiders are the
    winningest team in pro sports." They tried to play that aspect
    into some type of greatness at least in their own minds. 
    As it turns out  the Raiders have been mired in mediocrity for quite
    some time now and even they no longer take comfort from blurting
    that type of stuff.  
    
    On the bright side though, with the added wild-card slots, they have 
    a shot at making the playoffs. Wouldn't that be nice for a change?
    Super Bowl performances aside, there is still little doubt who the 
    dominant team is in the AFC West.  
    
    BoB
44.546DREAM ON DUDESWLDWST::LSUSTAITAMon Aug 20 1990 08:0311
    hay dudes im a raider fan and i think it will look like this
    LA RAIDERS     12-4
    DENVER         10-6
    KC CHIEFS       8-8
    SEATTLE         7-9
    SAN DIAGO       6-10
    
    WE'LL I CAN DREAM CAN'T I!
     BUT IT WILL BE BETWEEN K.C CHIEFS AND THE RAIDERS 
                                               COUNT ON IT!
    
44.547nextedAIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentMon Aug 20 1990 11:021
    Ralph _who_?!?
44.548FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Aug 20 1990 11:4913
    The Raiders are a very different organization to understand because the
    jobs titles for their front-office personnel are very different from
    those around the league.  Instead of Public Relations people, Business
    Managers, College Personnel folks and so on, they call their people
    "Senior Executive" and "Senior Administrator", which makes it difficult
    for someone from the outside to figure out who's responsible for what. 
    They also tend to have a smaller front office than most other teams in
    the league.
    
    They are also the team that lists more lawyers in the organization
    than any other team.
    
    John
44.549ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansMon Aug 20 1990 12:4612
    
    The Raiders barely won the Cowboys (16-14)this weekend. Strange
    how they can play so well against the best and so poorly against
    the worst. The Raiders go against the Bears Friday night at 8:00
    P.M. E.S.T., NBC will be telecasting the game. 
    
    re: .545
    Take of them orange and blue sun glasses, and face reality bOb.
    The Raiders winning history testifies to their greatness, whether
    you choose to see it or not!
    
    Carlos
44.550just curiousCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanMon Aug 20 1990 14:531
      Carlos,  How long you been a faider fan???
44.551Re: 550ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansMon Aug 20 1990 15:045
    
     Tim, since '76, I was 12 years old then, and thats around the time
    I became interested in football, girls, and other manly type stuff.
    
    Carlos
44.552ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansMon Aug 20 1990 16:0912
    
       The Raiders might be moving back to Oakland in time for the 
    start of the NFL season, according to a broadcast report.
       ESPN, citing unidentified sources, reported Sunday night that
    Raiders owner Al Davis is scrambling to work out final details,
    including a buyout of the team's lease at the Los Angeles Coliseum.
       ESPN also reported that the NFL has been prepared for months
    for a quick switch back to Oakland.
       Davis could not be reached for comment by The Associated Press.
       In other news, the Raiders signed defensive end Greg Townsend.
    
    Carlos
44.553LAGUNA::MAY_BRMon Aug 20 1990 16:1610
    re .552
    
    Anyone notice the Raiders shirts & hats, etc?  The stuff they're
    selling this year have no city mentioned...just says the Raiders.
    
    This ESPN report is partially based on the fact that Dan's favorite
    band--New Kids-- has cancelled a concerted scheduled for the same day
    as a Raiders home game.  I don't know how much truth is in this.
    
    Bruce
44.554Old rumourCOGITO::HILLMon Aug 20 1990 16:1811
    This rumour has been around for at least a year. Would they move
    immediately? What about the people who have already paid for tickets in
    LA? If they are moving next year, I don't think the LA fans would be
    happy about supporting a team in it's lame duck year.
    
    Besides, I thought that the Oaklland deal fell through, since those
    idiots on the city council wanted to waste money on stupid thgings like
    schools and trash collection instead of wisely investing it by handing
    it over to Al Davis.
    
    Tom
44.555Sounds like a fair and equitable dealEARRTH::BROOKSA radical thinker on a musical levelMon Aug 20 1990 16:226
    It did Tom, but apparantly, Al realized that sanity again reigned over
    the city, so he and the city of Oakland worked out a much more
    realistic package that could bring the Raiders back, without
    bankrupting the city.
    
    DOc 
44.556"OFF TO RAIDER LAND-AT LEAST FOR NOW"WMOIS::E_FASSETTTue Aug 21 1990 12:3811
    I am going for a visit to Los Angeles tomorrow. I hope to find out how
    the people of L.A feel about the RAIDERS and the latest rumors.
    Unfortunately the RAIDERS are going to be playing in Chicago this
    weekend, and the RAIDERS have closed practices so I will not be able to
    see them while I am there. But when i return in 9 days I will update
    this file about what the press and the newspapers in L.A. think about
    all this.
    
    
    
    
44.557BOSOX::KHARRISWed Aug 22 1990 09:586
    The Raiders are trying to trade Van McElroy, who is holding out. There
    are three teams that are interested, the Seahawks showing the most
    interest. It is believed that the Raiders want a 2nd round pick
    for him. 
    
                                        Kenn
44.558COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanWed Aug 22 1990 11:403
      A 2nd rounder??  He's a good hitter, but his coverage is lacking IMO.
    
    		Tim
44.559Hate to see him go!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansWed Aug 22 1990 18:5812
    
    McElroy missed most of last year with a hamstring injury, but Eddie
    Anderson proved to be an excellent replacement with a team high
    five interceptions, including two for touchdowns. Anderson runs
    well, can accelerate to the ball and arrives with a bang. The Raiders
    will do well to get a second round for McElroy, and who ever gets
    McElroy will do well too, as Vann is more than just a good hitter.
    He is excellent at keying run and pass, and is aggressive in run
    support. He also has quickness in coverage and gets a good jump
    on the airborne football.
    
    Carlos
44.560Oakland RaidersDVF::FORGETFri Aug 24 1990 13:078
    
    
    
       Well troops it Raider Football tonite against the Chicago Bears.
    Their's been a lot of rumors lately about our Club moving back to
    Oakland.  I hope Greg Townsend plays.....Even though it's preseason
    i'm looking forward for the game.  I'm a Mike Dikita (sp) Fan too.
    I like his style....
44.562BSS::G_MCINTOSHVom Hochland German ShepherdsFri Aug 24 1990 13:334
    Steven, it's on NBC   ~/~
    
    
    Glenn
44.563ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansFri Aug 24 1990 13:569
    
    Steven, the game will be played in Chicago, and as Glenn pointed
    out, NBC will be telecasting it at 8:00 EST. If the Raiders can
    contain Anderson, get their own running game going, and Shroeder 
    executes well...then the Raiders should win. Also, the Bears have 
    scored 40 points and allowed 15 in their pre-season games, which 
    is still pretty good.
    
    Carlos
44.564QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Fri Aug 24 1990 17:1217
   DONKS ROOL!!!

   Brain damaged Faider fans face another year of having nothing to bray
   about except their FORMER greatness, and their envy of the CONTINUING
   success of the Denver Broncos.

   Faiders and Semenhawks will battle it out for the bottom slot in the
   AFC West.

   Kansas has a legitimate chance to challenge the Broncos.

   Chargers in third place.

   You heard it hear first!
   Mike JN

   PS - PUMPKINS IN YO FACE, DEWDS!!!
44.565DASXPS::KHARRISFri Aug 24 1990 17:346
    Kansas City has a great running game, and a solid defense but their
    QB's SU*K. I really can't see them putting up a lot of points this
    year. I still think that if Tolliver plays well S.D. will be tough
    this year. What a mistake they made letting Gary Anderson get away.
    
    Kenn
44.566Oakland again!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansFri Aug 24 1990 18:0220
    
    >Kansas City has a great running game,
    
    Only if Okoye stays healthy, otherwise they're nothing special.
    
    >and a solid defense
    
    agreed
    
    >but their QB's SU*K.
    
    so do their receivers.
    
    As far as S.D. is concerned, I think they have a realistic chance
    of making the playoffs especially with that parity junk. Matter
    of fact, I think all of the AFC West with the exception of Seattle,
    will be fighting 'til the last week to get into the playoffs. Don't
    expect Denver to have it in the bag this year.
    
    Carlos
44.567America's team = BEARS!!!!!ELMAGO::RBARELAFri Aug 24 1990 19:017
    San Diego with the signing of Junior Seau has the (IMO) best front
    seven in that divison.  
    
    
    
    Bears will win tonight!
    
44.568Ahmad, the NFL's slowest manCSC32::SALZERHand me the pliers.Sat Aug 25 1990 17:5410
    I caught some of friday night's action. Alzado looked surprisingly
    ok, and ok is far better than I felt he would do. Ahmad Rashad has
    got to be the worst.  I blew my beans and weinies on about the 
    umpteenth mentioning of 'this is only a pre-season game' or 
    was it the 583rd mention of 'Raider tradition', or maybe it was
    'you really have to make that catch' repeated over and over and
    over and........... Hey Ahmad! Get a real job! Soemthing your good
    at would be nice. PHewwwww.
    
    BoB    
44.569DEFENSEDASXPS::KHARRISTue Aug 28 1990 12:1130
    Once again the defense looked superb. Aaron Wallace really looks
    like he is gonna be a force (3 sacks against the Bears). With the
    return of Greg Townsend and the play of Wallace the Raiders should
    have a dominating pass rush. One thing that I found to be weird
    is that Bill Pickel is playing DE and Howie Long is playing DT.
    
    Schroeder looked horrible again. However there is no excuse for
    the ball that Gault dropped. With the return of Steve Smith, no
    matter who the Raiders pair up with him in the backfield, they 
    should have a solid backfield. The OL is playing great altough the
    loss of Bruce Wilkerson will hurt. 
    
    Anybody have any info. on what's going on with Terry McDaniel. Gary
    Lewis has been a pleasent surprise in his place. It should be difficult
    to cut some of the young players that they have today.
    
                                                 Kenn
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
44.570Alzado RetiresDASXPS::KHARRISWed Aug 29 1990 10:455
    Lyle Alzado retired yesterday. This came about when the Raiders
    told him that he was not gonna make the team. For anyone that is
    interested, there is a column on the Raiders in the USA Today.
    
                                        Kenn
44.571QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Aug 29 1990 12:2012
   I didn't see the article, but I did hear Alzado say that he felt he
   could still perform, and produce at the NFL level for at least 3 or 4
   more years. (I saw him in the Bears game.. thought he looked good).

   He said that Al Davis agreed with that assessment, but felt that the
   Raider Organization would be better served by grooming someone younger.

   ( Ya think that's true? Uncle Al never strick me as particularly
   subtle, or concerned with anyone's feelings; but I gotta think that if
   Lyle was cuttin it, Al'd be the first to play him. )

   Mike JN
44.573hope it was swearvinCNTROL::CHILDSWill Soxs Choke? Stay tuned....Wed Aug 29 1990 14:537
 Who scored the other td for the raiders last week. I know Butterfingers
 redeem himself and caught one, who got the other?

 Steve and JN, Glenn has your shirts...

mike
44.574Steve SmithBOSOX::KHARRISWed Aug 29 1990 16:285
    Steve Smith had a 5 yard run in the 2nd half. Fernandez only had
    a couple of receptions (I believe 3) for minimal yardage, (under
    20 yards). 
    
                                   Kenn
44.575CSC32::SALZERKuwatis Interuptis.Wed Aug 29 1990 17:406
    Damn! I was hoping they would keep Alzado so that he would fill
    the spot of someone more capable and qualified. Also we could 
    watch him sit on his helmet and remember those good 'ol 
    Raider traditions. 
    
    BoB
44.576Say la vCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanWed Aug 29 1990 17:446
      Retired??  The local media had him down as being cut.  It don't
    matter, 'cause he is better off not playing and getting hurt, hell the
    guy is a dinasour ;^^.   Don't act either Lyle, stick with your ESPN
    show or broadcasting which anybody can do.
    
    		Tim
44.577CAM::WAYJimi and Stevie Ray, jammin' on...Wed Aug 29 1990 17:529
Well, actually, I was kind of hoping that Lyle would make good.

He was kind of an inspiration for us old guys trying out new sports.

I thought he looked pretty good against the Bears, but I guess not...

Oh well...

'Saw
44.578CSC32::SALZERKuwatis Interuptis.Thu Aug 30 1990 17:049
    By the way, does anyone know where the Raiders are playing this
    season. Or maybe better asked, does anybody care?  
    
    Ops! There I go again. I promised myself I would try to be more
    understanding and a kinder more gentler anti-Raider type. It's
    hard to raise that knee jerk reaction from the 'new' Raider
    faithful.  I'll try to work on that.
    
    BoB
44.579Smith out for the yearDECXPS::KHARRISFri Aug 31 1990 10:365
    Anthony Smith, the Raiders #1 pick this year, is out for the season.
    An OL fell on his knee during practice and it will require surgeory.
    It's too bad because Smith Looked to be quite a pass rusher.
    
                                            Kenn
44.580Ouch!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumansFri Aug 31 1990 14:347
    
    To bad about Smitty, he'll be missed this year, although I really
    have'nt heard as much about his impact on the team, as I have about
    Wallace. That must've hurt.....considering that all the starting
    OL weigh in at 275lbs. or better. 
    
    Carlos
44.581Beuelein Signs=Evans CutDASXPS::KHARRISTue Sep 04 1990 10:2218
    The Raiders finished out the Preseason on a storng note beating
    San Diego 34-7. Schroeder had decent #'s, although I did not see
    the game. Napoleon McCallum must have made the team with his
    performance, 14 carries for 80+ yards. Greg Bell had a 27 yard TD
    run as well. The defense played well again limiting S.D. to approx.
    17 min. in possesion time. The offensive line only allowed 1 sack.
    
    In transaction made this weekend, Steve Beuerlein was signed to
    a 1 year $400k contract. OL john Gesek was traded to Dallas for
    an undisclosed draft choice. Players cut were; QB's-Vince Evans
    & Jeff Francis, LB's-Rickey Hunley, Darin Jordan & Ron Burton, FB
    Kerry Porter, TE Trey Junkin, Special Teams Captain Stefon Adams,
    OL Bruce Davis, And DB's Elvis Patterson & Derrick Crudup.
    
    IT's too bad about Porter, he looked good. However with the logjam
    the Raiders have at RB ther was noway he would make the team.
    
                                      Kenn
44.582COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Sep 04 1990 13:341
      Beurlien signed for 400k??  Wasn't he asking for a million?
44.583DECXPS::KHARRISTue Sep 04 1990 14:256
    Beuerlein did sign for $400k. He was asking for more than a million,
    then he lowered his demand, to $1million for 1 year, the same as
    Schroeder got. However as has been the case this year, all of Ralph
    Cindrichs' clients have over priced their value!
    
                                          Kenn
44.584COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Sep 04 1990 19:251
      Does Cindrich handle Ron Holmes as well?? 
44.585I love fine literature.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Tue Sep 04 1990 19:2913
    The first game of the season ought to be a dandy, 
    and Jay Schroeder is gonna melt the Bronc defense like candy.
    
    The Raiders defense is looking bold,
    and that ain't good news 'cause John Elway is getting old. 
    
    Dan Reeves is a sleaze,
    and him, will Art Shell appease.
    
    
    Carlos  
    
44.586GOOD LUCK TO THE RAIDERS!!!WLDWST::LSUSTAITAWed Sep 05 1990 09:209
    Raiders dudes lets hope for a totally flowless season
    man we need this year to show that we are still here 
    The Silver and Black are back!!!
    The Raiders Team of all decades!!!!!!!!!
                                     Thats a fact jack!!!!!
                                           *********point of no return*****
    
    
                                                    
44.587CSC32::J_HERNANDEZWaiting for my Kuwaiti VacationWed Sep 05 1990 10:4811
    Da Pa-Raiders are a team dat sips thru a straw
    Their ineptitude leaves all true fans in awe.
    but pa_Raider faithful see thru black colored glasses
    As their hapless team gets kicked on their Assas.
    
    Da faithful always talk of a notable past feat
    'tho now their a team dat even Denver cain beat.
    NOw they signed a big bum named Jay.
    IMO the Raides have truly faided away. 
    
    Den 28 Pa-Raiders 10
44.588OOPS::MACGREGORWed Sep 05 1990 11:339
    The Raiders should have a good season.  I will say that their offense
    will sputter all year, but that it will improve as the season goes
    along.  The defense will be better than average, which will result
    in a wild card spot, but an early exit.
    
    I'd LOVE to see them will it all, but I don't even see them winning
    the division.
    
    The Wizard
44.589Roses are red, violets are blue, Elway hasn't got a clue!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Wed Sep 05 1990 12:3311
    
    re. .587 
          The form of your prose is truly beautiful and inspiring
          but the context, I am afraid to say, is totally unacceptable.
    
      
    In other Raider news Mike Alexander, WR, and Bruce Wilkerson, OT,
    were placed on injured reserve, and Vince Evans, QB, and Elvis "Toast"
    Patterson, CB, were recalled from waivers.
    
    Carlos
44.590Melt Broncs def? Dream on!!COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanWed Sep 05 1990 20:331
      Toast recalled??  How dumb can Shell be?
44.591Wishin more than knowinCSC32::SALZERThu Sep 06 1990 01:483
    Donks by a dozen.
    
    BoB
44.592Raiders By 3DASXPS::KHARRISThu Sep 06 1990 10:545
    I like the Raiders by 3. The games are always close. The Raider
    defense is playing great and their running game looks good. It will
    be nice to see the Bronc's starting out 0-1.
    
                               Kenn
44.593ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Thu Sep 06 1990 13:545
    
    The Raiders placed Dennis Price, cornerback, on IR and recalled
    Ron Burton, linebacker off waivers.
    
    Carlos
44.594^^ELWAY WON'T LAST THE GAME^^WMOIS::E_FASSETTThu Sep 06 1990 18:115
    THE RAIDERS 24
    THE DONKS    7
    
    Start of a great year for the Raiders, and the start of a long,long
    year for the vastly overrated donks. 
44.595should be one of the better Week 1 matchupsSTAR::YANKOWSKASGo Rochester Red Wings!Thu Sep 06 1990 18:305
    I'll agree with whoever said Raiders by a FG, only because the game is
    at the Coliseum.
    
    
    py
44.596No sweat.NEXUS::GL_JOHNSONI survived GMIII &amp; NY subwaysThu Sep 06 1990 19:1116
    
    RAIDERS   27
    Donks     23
    
    	As per usual with these teams, there shall be lots of fights, 
    flags from the zebras, and all sorts of other shenanigans.
    
    	RAIDER/Den. games usually do not result in blowouts, and this
    should be no exception.  It's also extra special since they're meeting
    in the first game of the season.  The last time that occurred, in 1986,
    Denver, with the help of the Pile-It-High refs :-), eeked out with a 
    38-36 win.  
    
    	Just sit back and enjoy.
    
    						 glen j. 
44.597Hmmm?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Thu Sep 06 1990 19:314
    Just read that the Coluseium is willing to drop a 58 million dollar
    breach of contract lawsuit against the Raiders if they stay in L.A..
    
    Carlos
44.598This Games For You!!!CSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Thu Sep 06 1990 21:0716
    
    Even without a defensive line the Broncos will beat the Raiders.
    something like this::
    
    Bronkoids  23   3 field goals and 2 touchdowns
    
    Raiders    16   3 field goals and 1 touchdown
    
    
    Should be a good game.....More important for the Raiders to win
    to establish they can play with the Champions......
    
     
    Drewski
    
    
44.599COBRA::DINSMOREIt was the blister.. honestFri Sep 07 1990 09:394
    ok denver fans send me mail on this one, raiders by at least 10..
    
    dinz
    
44.600kiss of Death!!!!! By DinzGOLF::KINGRSave the EARTH, we may need it later!!!Fri Sep 07 1990 10:143
    DInz just gave the Donks a victory!!!
    
    REK
44.601ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Fri Sep 07 1990 12:1411
    
    >Should be a good game...More important for the Raiders to win to
    >establish that they can play with champions.
    
    That's already been established, last Dec. 3rd, L.A.-16 Donks-13.
    Besides I can't consider anybody who got creamed 55-10 in the S.B.
    a 'champion'. This game should be equally important for both teams, 
    if they have the goal of winning the division title and making the 
    play-offs this year. 
    
    Carlos
44.603He's a wuss when you call his bluff, eh Steven?AXIS::ROBICHAUD16YearsLater-He'sStillACrookFri Sep 07 1990 12:231
    
44.604CSC32::SALZERFri Sep 07 1990 15:534
    They'll be lucky to score 10, let alone win by 10. Sounds like
    happy hour hit a little early for the Dinz today.
    
    BoB 
44.605DASXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Fri Sep 07 1990 16:323
    Steven, the Dinz sure can dance, huh?  :*)
    
    Lee
44.606One Question???CSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 18:2111
    
    Carlos,
    
    Who are the Defending AFC CHAMPS?????  Ha ha ha....
    
    I rest my case!!!!
    
    
    Drewski
    
    
44.607Raiders 3-1 Broncs 0-4, Now that's funny!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Fri Sep 07 1990 18:5415
                                                   
       Division championships, conference championships, high school state
    championships, they're all nice, but TRUE champions win the Super-Bowl.
    You see Droopski(tm), when you look at the big picture, or in other
    words, when people consider the history of football teams like the 
    Raiders, 49'ers, Cowboys, Dolphins and the Steelers, they bestow
    respect, honor and pride upon them. But on the other hand, other
    teams, that need not be mentioned, are often refered to with sentiments 
    of ridicule and often times find themselves the butt of the joke. And 
    until such teams can win the big one, they will more than likely
    always be remembered as the one's who choked rather than as champs.
    (JMHO).
    
    Carlos
    
44.609Back for a quickie !!QUASER::HUNTERJack's Diner, No Brains, No ServiceFri Sep 07 1990 19:087
    Let me say this about that...
    
     The Donks can't loose this game....  No way, No how !!
    Bet the house,  Donks by 20 and you can take that to the
    bank, Dinzy !!
    
    Big Game
44.610Let's Try It AgainCSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 19:149
    
    Sounds like your taking this Personal Carlos.
    
    Just answer the Question...WHO ARE THE DEFENDING AFC CHAMPS???
    
    
    Drewski
    
    
44.611EBOSOX::KHARRISFri Sep 07 1990 20:5311
    Over and over again, you Bronco fans say us Raider fans live in
    the past, however, last year is this past so lets worry about this
    year. As I said before this will be a close game, but given the
    home field advantage I like the Raiders by 3. Denver has a very
    good team. I feel that the Raiders also have the necleous of a very
    good team. Hopefully it will be a hard fought game and the zebra's
    wont play a intricate part in the outcome of this contest. Just
    remember one thing, You can't bite on the first deek by a Raider
    receiver or HE'S GONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
                                           Kenn
44.612former NOTY and Donks #1 fan back in town!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CNTROL::CHILDSand the wind it cried Mary..Fri Sep 07 1990 22:457
 Cacti you son of gun took you long enough to rear that head of yours..
 Just remember buddy you owe me a chance to get even on a personal name bet
pal....

can't wait to hassle and be hassled by you....

mike
44.613THE SILVER AND BLACK ARE BACKWMOIS::E_FASSETTMon Sep 10 1990 11:268
    Hey all you RAIDER fans out there, I hope you all made lots of money
    like I did on the Raiders this week. Although the offense for the
    Raiders did not look great, the defense sure came through. But as Al
    Davis always says-" JUST WIN BABY WIN". I hope that all the DONK fans
    out there thank MRS. Elway for that great pass to Jerry Robinson.
    
    Eddie F.
     
44.614COBRA::DINSMOREIt was the blister.. honestMon Sep 10 1990 11:284
    ok, i was off by  2 points in my raider  prediction
    
    dinz
    
44.615find a QB quickFMCSSE::BROWNRound'n Third and Head'n for HomeMon Sep 10 1990 11:346
    
    The Silver and Black may be back but the offense stayed in El Segundo.
    What a crummy game, No offense on either side. Al needs to find QB
    soon.
    
    Cadzilla
44.616LA 14, Denver 9BSS::JCOTANCHBring Back Gerry!Mon Sep 10 1990 12:1312
    RE .6RE .615
    Totally agree that it was a crummy game.  If the Raiders don't get
    something going on offense, they will have a tough time against pitiful
    Seattle next week.  Both teams were inept on offense and had their
    share of dropped passes.  The key was the Raiders got the points off the
    turnovers, and that was the difference.  If someone had told me that
    the Bronco defense would shut out the Raider offense, I would have said 
    Denver would win easy.  The bottom line is the Raiders got the win, but
    there's still 15 weeks of football left.  But let's face it, we didn't
    either team's real offense yesterday.  
    
    Joe  
44.617Raiders 1-0 Donks 0-1ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Mon Sep 10 1990 12:5017
    
    Ain't taking it personal. Just enjoy bashing the Broncs, who by
    the way, got bashed by the Raiders. The Raiders have extended their
    series lead between the Broncos now to 40-18-2. Tell you who is
    taking personal though, that knucklehead Gaulke, he took it so personal
    that instead of bashing the Raiders he he took a poke at me because
    of my race, ex: "Thanks for the input Pedro." , shame on you Gaulke,
    such bigotry is against company policy and it doesn't show a tremendous
    amount of depth for you either. 
    
    >Al needs to find a QB soon.
    
     I think the receivers are to blame for this weekend, not Schroeder.
    They missed some key plays that would have gotten the Raiders excellent
    field position and even more importantly kept the drives alive.
    
    Carlos
44.619Close againCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanMon Sep 10 1990 13:3110
      Tension,  Some people thrive on it, and some people die from it.
    
      Congrats to the Faider D.  They looked good as did the Bronc D.  I do
    totally agree on the drop pass situation for both teams.  ITs
    unacceptable.  Look for Denver to come out strong against the Cheifs,
    who by the way played a good game yesterday.
    
      Seattle will give the LA/OAK team a run next week.
    
    		Tim
44.620DASXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Mon Sep 10 1990 13:397
    Calling Cactus Jack, calling Cactus Jack, come in, Cactus Jack.
    
    Where are you now living, Jack?  Since you be the house on the Donks,
    are you sharing a stall with them?  It's the least they could do
    for ya.  :*)
    
    Lee
44.621A Fresh StartROYALT::FORGETMon Sep 10 1990 16:2110
    
    
    
       A win is a win.  Raiders started the season off on a good note.
    The defensive came threw.  I have a question for my fellow Raider
    Fans.  What ever happened to Lester Hayes????? It was also nice to
    see Kenny"the Snake"Stabler on TNT last Night.....
    
    
    Mike
44.622ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Mon Sep 10 1990 16:522
    
    I think Lester was cut last year. He was a good one huh?
44.623I believe that Lester's a velcro salesman now.AXIS::ROBICHAUDNostra/DONusMon Sep 10 1990 16:541
    
44.624ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Mon Sep 10 1990 17:379
     
    Anybody notice the similarity between the Falcons uniforms and the
    Raiders? I think Jerry Glanville is a Raider wanna-be, first when 
    he was coaching the Oilers, the Oilers called themselves the 'Bad Boys'
    of the NFL, but everybody knows who the real 'Bad Boys' are. And
    now that he's with the Falcons he's even dressing them up like Raiders.
     
                                    
    Carlos
44.625BOSOX::KHARRISMon Sep 10 1990 18:1314
    Lester Hayes had a foot injury and he felt that the team did not
    treat him properly for it. He complained publicly about his treatment
    and the Raiders cut him, 3 years ago. It's too bad becuse Hayes
    was one of the best corners ever to play the game.
    
    I noticed that Terry McDaniel played yesterday, where was he hidding
    all preseason??? The defense of the Raiders continued its great
    play and the offense once again left some questions for us Raider
    fans. Why is Willie Gault getting the ball and not Brown and
    Fernandez?? If the Seahags play anywhere near the way they played
    against the Bears, then the Raiders will hand them their heads.
    
                                           Kenn
    
44.626BSS::JCOTANCHBring Back Gerry!Mon Sep 10 1990 19:1613
>>    play and the offense once again left some questions for us Raider
>>    fans. Why is Willie Gault getting the ball and not Brown and
>>    Fernandez?? If the Seahags play anywhere near the way they played
>>    against the Bears, then the Raiders will hand them their heads.
    
Brown probably wasn't getting the ball becuase they might have lost 
confidence in him after he fumbled a punt and dropped a pass when the 
ball was right to him.

Agree that the Seaweeds played bad against Chicago, but the Raiders will
definitely have to pick it up a notch on offense if they expect to win.

Joe    
44.627RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGriffey's to the left, Griffey's to the right.Mon Sep 10 1990 19:258
Why do the Raiders have to pick it up a notch?  The Seahawks are pitiful.
    Believe me.  Even the locals are saying a 4-12 season will be a
    good season.....
    
    They have no running game, a questionable offensive line, and the
    defensive secondary is virtually non-existant.
    
    JD
44.628CSC32::J_HERNANDEZWaiting for my Kuwaiti VacationTue Sep 11 1990 10:5712
    >>They have no running game, a questionable offensive line, and the
    >>defensive secondary is virtually non-existant.
    
    
    dat is precisely why da pa-Raiders (tm) need to pick it up a notch.
    Sheesh. If they cain't move against da HeeHaws (tm) then they are in
    some real serious trouble offensively. 194 yds against da Donkeys is
    noth'in to be proud of. Da hawks will crush da hapless pa-Raiders (tm).
    
    
    p.s.  Da CAAYOBI (tm) club was loving Mr. Ed's td pass. Pure poetry
    dudes!!!
44.629hope to see many more like itCNTROL::CHILDSBubby's just another Momma's boy\Tue Sep 11 1990 11:177
Yeah ESPN on their monday qb show replayed ED's TD as the easy TD of
the weekend.....

;^)

mike
44.630Hot Or Cold?DECXPS::KHARRISTue Sep 11 1990 14:4812
    Denvers defense is better than Seattles! About the only thing you
    have to watch out for when you play Seattle is a hot Dave Kreig
    at QB. I like J.L. Williams at RB but the run and shoot has got
    to go. 
    
    About the Tim Brown thing, if the Raiders have lost confidence in
    him, then why did they give up a #1 for Willie Gault?? Gault has
    been dropping passes his whole career. The guy can fly but he drops
    to many balls. Tim Brown should not be returning punts anyway, thats
    how he got hurt last year.
    
                                           Kenn
44.631Raiders by 10 or more!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Tue Sep 11 1990 16:2211
    re last few
    
    It was only the first game of the season, and you have to expect
    them to be a little bit rusty still, Gault and Brown should both have
    a great game against the Seahawks as well as  the rest of the Raider
    offense, which missed last weeks game. The Seahawks have in the
    past, always played the Raiders very tough, but I don't think that
    this will be the case this weekend.
    
    Carlos
    
44.632Rampant HomerismAIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentTue Sep 11 1990 16:438
44.633CAM::WAYNever drew first when I drew first bloodTue Sep 11 1990 17:089
>>         Based on what, I wonder.


Probably the fact that the Seahawks sip through the proverbial straw,
and seem to have less of a team this year than last.  Last year, 
they inhaled very discreetly, but they were better than this year.

Probably based on that.....
'Saw
44.634Did I say 10? Make it 11.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Tue Sep 11 1990 19:1311
    Precisely, as Mr. 'Saw stated. They were mediocre last year(7-9) and 
    have worsened, while the Raiders were also mediocre(8-8) but have 
    improved. For the last 2 years it has been Seahawk victories late in 
    the season that have ended any possible Raider playoff hopes. They 
    also swept the Raiders last season 24-20 (wk.4), and 23-17 (wk.15) 
    in close games. Thus, leading me to my conclusion that, although
    they have always played  each other tough in the past, now, due
    to the decline of Seattle and the improvement of the Raiders, it
    will not be as close of a game as we are accustomed to.
    
    Carlos
44.635DECWET::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Tue Sep 11 1990 20:4112
Frank Wa...

that was far too kind and too gentle....

The Seahawks will be contending with the Cowboys and the Patriots for the title

"Worst team in the NFL" this year....

They are bad, Bad, BAd, BAD


Metz
44.636WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his Lips...Know New Taxes!!Wed Sep 12 1990 09:583
       The raiders have signed a 20-year lease to stay in LA. This
    obviously means they'll be out of there within 5.
                                           Denny
44.637Then again, who cares???COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanWed Sep 12 1990 14:533
      Denny,  I give it 3 years.  The Uncle will want out by then.
    
    		Tim
44.638Can't have a short memory with this guyLAGUNA::MAY_BRWed Sep 12 1990 15:026
    
    Al only committed that he would stay in LA.  Al only said he would stay
    in LA.  Al only promised he would stay in LA.  It's not like he really
    has to.  He hasn't signed anything yet.
    
    
44.640Don't BLAM Al, BLAM the city of Oakland ... :-(FRSBEE::BROOKSI can make it 'mo better ....Wed Sep 12 1990 15:2214
    From what I saw on ESPN , we shouldn't jump on Al Davis. Once again,
    the City Of Oakland blew it. 
    
    Apparantly, nothing could be done in Oakland until some
    geo-something-or-other studies were done, and a report filed. (I assume
    to fully repair and strengthen the O-AC against future quakes.)
    
    This was not done, as a result, nothing else could be done. When
    Oakland fumbled the ball, LA picked it up and ran. 
    
    moreover, the LA Collesuim(sp) will be renovated at no charge to the
    taxpayers (uh huh ...)
    
    Doc
44.641CX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackWed Sep 12 1990 15:266
    One reason the city of Oakland may be apprehensive in bringing back
    the Raiders is that the A's reportedly would be very upset if the
    Raiders came back to the Oakland Coliseum.  The A's obviously are
    the primary tenant of the Coliseum right now.
                       
    Joe
44.642SASE::SZABOWed Sep 12 1990 15:283
    
    dinz, send 'Saw and Walt femail.
    
44.644home sweet home ??ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLuke 6:46Wed Sep 12 1990 17:037
    The football team still could be lost to L.A., however, if the
    Coluseum's private managers are unable to come up with an enviromental
    impact report allowing a $145-million renovation of the Coluseum,
    along with private financing to pay for it. The renovation must
    be completed within two years. 
    
    Carlos
44.645WMOIS::JBARROWSHang on tight and don't let goThu Sep 13 1990 14:493
    I heard this morning on the radio that schools in L.A. are banning
    the wearing of Raiders clothing due to the fact that gang members
    wear the Raiders coats to identify themselves!
44.646CAM::WAYBatman plays rugby...Robin plays softballThu Sep 13 1990 16:032
Gee, I always thought black and silver were neutral...kind of like
Switzerland....
44.647RAIDERS RULEWMOIS::E_FASSETTFri Sep 14 1990 16:455
    Raiders- 24 
    Seahags- 10
    The fans may be loud at the dome but the only thing loud by games end
    will be the booing the fans give the Seahags.
    
44.648GO RAIDERS WLDWST::LSUSTAITAMon Sep 17 1990 04:167
    THE RAIDERS won 17-13 with a 44yard catch from schrader to fernandez
    and a bell 3yard rush,it was a pretty sight raiders defence 
    still looked very good the offence is starting to show a 
    little more angals i hope i spelled that right? we'll
    we got the steelers next week im hoping for a 21-14 win for 
    THE LOS ANGELES RAIDERS
                                            THE ULTIMATE RAIDER FAN
44.6492-0, that's two and zippo, deuce and zilch, twain an....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Sep 17 1990 12:146
    
    You've gotta love it! The Raiders are off to a great start, 2-0,
    and perhaps more importantly, 2-0 within the division. Now if only
    K.C. can stuff the Broncs tonight, we'll be sitting real pretty.
    
    Carlos
44.651ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Sep 17 1990 12:5210
    	I agree that the Seahawks got the short end with the Fernandez
    catch, glad to see the Raiders got a play off before further review
    could take place. But I think it was a good call on the apparent
    Williams T.D., the ref was right on top of the play, so there was
    no need for a replay. The Seahawks also had a couple of calls go
    their way, ex: the generous spot, giving the Seahawks a first on
    the final drive that could have changed the outcome. Gotta hand
    it to Krieg, he's one tough sucker, countless times he knew that
    he was gonna get drilled but got the passes off anyway.
44.652BSS::JCOTANCHJust Do It, SpartansMon Sep 17 1990 13:095
    Yes, the Seahawks got ripped bad on those 2 calls.  So, the Faiders are
    outgained by the mighty Seahawks and need a TD with less than 2 minutes
    left to pull it out.  I'm impressed.
    
    Joe
44.653CSC32::J_HERNANDEZWow, Good nyborg man.Mon Sep 17 1990 13:555
    >>       <<< Note 44.652 by BSS::JCOTANCH "Just Do It, Spartans" >>>
      
    What Spartans? 
    
    The Roiders D looked pretty good but the O needs to get better. 
44.654BSS::G_MCINTOSHVom Hochland German ShepherdsTue Sep 18 1990 11:374
    Howie Long will miss a minimum of 6 weeks with a broken third toe on
    his right foot, and a dislocated second toe.
    
    Glenn
44.655STAR::YANKOWSKASLittle roller up along first...Tue Sep 18 1990 11:406
    addendum to .654:
    
    Steve Beuerlein was reactivated to take Long's spot on the roster.
    
    
    py 
44.656Fingers I can see, but toes?SASE::SZABOTue Sep 18 1990 12:115
    How does one break and especially, dislocate one of the smaller toes?
    Did someone apply the DDG (Denver Death Grip) (tm) to Howie's foot,
    pulling off his shoe and then jamming his foot turfward?
    
    Hawk
44.657QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Sep 18 1990 14:526
   Unwitting dupe of a diabolic practical joke, Howie had both toes firmly
   inserted into his nostrils when he was viciously slapped by a Seahawk
   cheerleader.

   HTH
   Mike JN
44.658Steelers should prevailCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Sep 18 1990 19:361
      He was kicking the bench;^^
44.659 Raiders by > 7 ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Sep 19 1990 14:3210
    
    Raiders are gonna melt the Steelers, look for Gault to burn Woodson
    at least once, and hopefully Tim Brown will hold on to a couple,
    but Mervyn will be the star again this week. Schroeder must be accurate
    and keep from being picked off. Greg Bell should also have a good day. 
    The Raiders defense (even without Howie) will be the dominating factor!
    Bubby's dead meat.
        
    Carlos
    
44.660Steelers by 2/USA Today -- line Raiders +5OASS::QUINN_RSteeler's on the RiseWed Sep 19 1990 16:0411
    
    The Raider O will resemble week 1's O primarily because of the Steeler
    Defense(2 pass, 2 rush, total in the AFC).  Pittsburgs O by the law of
    averages have to score a td or two.  With Charlie Browns cousin
    Schroeder(sp) throwing the ball there's sure to be a int. or two or
    three.  It's kind of his history although he's only thrown one this
    year.
    
    To bad about Howie may have to plan to runn right over his replacement.
    
    Roy L.
44.661-the "Silver & Black" is back....WLDWST::RILUSTREWed Sep 19 1990 22:027
    
        How about last Sunday's and tthe other Sunday's game? The Raiders
    looks good in both ends(offensively and defensively). I'm not much of a 
    Raiders's fan since they transfered to L.A. but I still follow their 
    games through the season-in every season.
    
    -bob-
44.662COMET::EDWARDSBroncos...one week at a timeThu Sep 20 1990 12:276
While I will admit that the raiders looked good on defense, they were
despicable on offense.  If it wasn't for Al Davis handing $1,000 bill to
the replay officials, the raiders would be 1-1 at the best.

	Ed^2
44.663ED ALWAYS LOOKING THRU SILVER AND BLACK GLASSESWMOIS::E_FASSETTThu Sep 20 1990 12:3610
    RE-44.662 If it wasn't for Al Davis handing $1,000 bill to the replay
    officials, the raiders would be 1-1 at the best
    
    But the fact of the matter is that the Raiders are 2-0 and right now
    they are the BEST in the west. Al Davis always says just win baby win!
    So be it by a bad call or whatever the Raiders are getting the job
    done.
    
    Los Angeles Raiders- 21    Pittsburg Stealers- 7
    
44.664just made my dayCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meThu Sep 20 1990 13:0617

>While I will admit that the raiders looked good on defense, they were
>despicable on offense.  If it wasn't for Al Davis handing $1,000 bill to
>the replay officials, the raiders would be 1-1 at the best.



 hahhahahaaaaa and Denver not a call in their life, right? hahahaaaa

 of course Smellway going 14-38 with 2 interceptions nad no TD's has
 nothing to do with the Raiders' fine record?

 Smash the Pumpkin!!!! (tm)

mike

44.665I don't care for either team, but go StellersCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanThu Sep 20 1990 13:381
      Mike is the true closet donk fan since Monty and HOOT left ;^^
44.666CSC32::SALZERThu Sep 20 1990 16:267
    I don't understand it. The Raiders offense is shut out in the opener
    and they win. They basically squeek by the Hawks and make it 2-0.
    Now they are alledgedly the best in the west. Their following says
    'just win'.  Yet this same  following accuses the Broncos of 'luck' 
    when they 'just win baby'. How does that work?
    
    BoB
44.667BoB, you devil you...AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Sep 20 1990 16:571
    
44.669Ooooouchie....CSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Fri Sep 21 1990 01:1310
    
    re-.666
    
    Did'n someone once say dat tha Truth Hurts...Oooooouch Bob.
    
    
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
    
44.670ELMAGO::CGRIEGORead Matthew chp. 24 Fri Sep 21 1990 12:5729
    >I don't understand it. The Raiders offense is shut out in the opener
    >and they win.
    
    I liked the way that you neglected to mention that the Donk offense
    was also 'shut out', but more than shut out, they were embarassed
    by the Raider defense which scored two TD's against the Donks.
    
    >Now they are alledgedly the best in the west.
    
    They are not 'alledged' but in fact are proven to be the class of
    the west at this point. Although a sound case can be made about
    their inferior competition. :-)   :-) 
    
    >Their following says 'just win'. 
    
    So does their leader. ('Big Al')
    
    >Yet this same following accuses the Broncos of 'luck' when they
    >'just win baby'. How does that work?
    
    Good question. And the answer is easy; when the Raiders just squeak
    by, they planned it that way, while on the other hand, when the
    Donks squeak by, it's because they just happened to luck out. Or
    another way of putting it, the "Raiders rule" and the "Donks orally
    vacuum immense quantities" (t.m.). :-)
    
    Hope this helps.
    
    Carlos
44.671Just Lose, Baby!BSS::JCOTANCHJust Do It, SpartansFri Sep 21 1990 13:1419
    
>    I liked the way that you neglected to mention that the Donk offense
>    was also 'shut out', but more than shut out, they were embarassed
>    by the Raider defense which scored two TD's against the Donks.
    
The performance of the Bronco offense doesn't have anything to do with the
fact that you were calling the Faiders 'awesome.'
    
>    when the Raiders just squeak
>    by, they planned it that way, while on the other hand, when the
>    Donks squeak by, it's because they just happened to luck out. 
 
Typical Faider fan looking through those silver and black tinted glasses again.

>    Hope this helps.
 
It doesn't help one bit.

Joe   
44.672ELMAGO::CGRIEGORead Matthew chp. 24 Fri Sep 21 1990 13:4411
>    The performance of the Bronco offense doesn't have anything to
>    do with the fact that you were calling the Faiders 'awesome'.
    
     Unless of course, you consider that the 'awesome Raiders' defense
     forced the Donks offensive performance to be so poor.
    
>    It doesn't help one bit.
    
     It was rhetorical.
    
     Carlos       
44.673BSS::JCOTANCHJust Do It, SpartansFri Sep 21 1990 14:4316
    
>     Unless of course, you consider that the 'awesome Raiders' defense
>     forced the Donks offensive performance to be so poor.
    
When Elway overthrows a screen pass right into the hands of a Faider 
linebacker without being pressured, it doesn't have anything to do with
an awesome defense.
When Vance fumbles the ball trying to reach for a first down, it doesn't 
have anything to do with an awesome defense.
When Kay drops a sure catch in the end zone without the defender breaking
up the play, it doesn't have anything to do with an awesome defense.

Hope THIS helps. (Just a rhetorical comment) :^) 

Joe
                                             
44.674 Raiders 3-0 ELMAGO::CGRIEGORead Matthew chp. 24 Fri Sep 21 1990 15:059
    Talk about looking through team colored glasses! When Mr. Magoo
    overthrew that screen pass it was because he was about to get his
    clock cleaned in the endzone, so instead he tried to dump it off
    but it backfired and instead of swallowing two points he choked
    on seven. And when 'the Vance' fumbled it was a direct result of
    being hit by a truck. (Can't remember if it was Anderson or McDaniel
    that put the hit on 'the Vance'.) 
    
    Carlos
44.675a modest proposalAIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentFri Sep 21 1990 15:576
    Hey, if anyone ever decides to write an objective, non-inflammatory reply 
    either to this topic or the Cleveland Browns topic, please flag it in
    some way so as to attract the attention of readers who might be looking
    for objectivity or even (gasp) facts.
    
    Until such time, my NEXT UNSEEN key is going to be seeing double duty.
44.676CSC32::SALZERFri Sep 21 1990 16:3413
    Objective? Non-inflammatory?  That's asking a lot when it comes to
    a good old fashined Donk-Faid pissin' contest. Like I said, I'm trying
    to become a kinder anti-Raider fan. So here goes. Sorry to hear 
    about Howie getting injured. If the guy could have a broken toe or
    twisted ankle all year it wouldn't break my heart though. (Sorry 
    that was a slip).  When do you think Jay Schroeder will peak?  
    The way I see it sometime next March.  Too bad about the Oakland 
    deal falling through.  Nothing I wanted better than a shot at 
    whomping the Raiders back in Oakland. (There I go again. Sorry). 
    It's a long road but I'll keep working on this.
    
    BoB 
    
44.677ELMAGO::CGRIEGORead Matthew chp. 24 Sat Sep 22 1990 10:3511
    >When do you think Jay Schroeder will peak?
    
    You mean he can get better??? (just kidding, I think Jay's a good
    QB) Read in the paper this morning that Hebert is closer than ever 
    to wearing silver and black, as a possible Dallas Cowboy back-up QB 
    Steve Walsh trade to New Orleans is under negotiation. The deal 
    which would send Walsh to New Orleans for a package of draft choices, 
    may be close to completion. But it appears to hinge on a trade of 
    Hebert to the Raiders for a first round pick.   
    
    Carlos
44.678LOOKING FOR A QB???CSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Sat Sep 22 1990 17:5711
    
    Looks like Bro.Al is trying to come to his senses about a QB but
    soory to say he'll be stupid to give #1 for heebert. I guess Bro. Al	
    See's what we all see :
    
    Raiders = NO QB = NO CONFERENCE TITLE = NO PLAYOFFS = NO FANS = GOOD
    LAUGHS = MORE LAUGHS   HA ha ha...........
    
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
44.679 3-0 ELMAGO::CGRIEGORead Matthew chp. 24 Mon Sep 24 1990 12:3812
    
    The Raider defense kept the Steelers from yet another game without
    an offensive touchdown, while the Raider offense scored two touchdowns
    2:31 appart in the fourth quarter to give the Raiders a 20-3 victory.
    Next weekend the Raiders face the Bears in L.A., and both teams
    are still undefeated. re. -1 Keep on laughing Drewski, but the Raiders
    are 3-0 without a QB and the Donks are struggling with their over
    rated QB, Mr. Magoo, as they lucked out again, against the Seahawks at 
    home. I wonder how much Reeves paid Norm Johnson to miss BOTH of
    those game winning field goals.
    
    Carlos
44.680ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustTue Sep 25 1990 17:105
    
    The Raiders activated Vann McElroy, safety, and placed seventh round
    draft pick Garry Lewis, cornerback, on injured reserve.
    
    Carlos
44.681Bears by 6COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Sep 25 1990 20:564
      Should be a defensive struggle come sunday.  The Bears D is better
    IMO.  Both offenses are shaky.
    
    		Tim
44.682Raiders +7 ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustWed Sep 26 1990 13:349
    The Bears offense just got a little shakier. Read in this mornings
    paper that RB Mark Green (stretched cartilage, left knee) will be
    out for two weeks; WR Wendell Davis (two sore hamstrings) is doubtful
    for Sunday; RB Neil Anderson (bruised ribs and possible torn cartilage
    around the ribs) will play wearing a flak jacket; and K Kevin Butlers
    hip pointer is affecting his kicking. The Raiders should have a
    field day.
    
    Carlos
44.683ACTING::MACGREGORWed Sep 26 1990 17:429
    Forget everything you know.  This SHOULD be a defensive battle,
    it won't, it SHOULD be low scoring, it won't, it SHOULD be two teams
    running each other into the group, it won't.
    
    It will be a fairly high scoring game where the defenses are average
    at best and both QB's throw for 250 yds.  However, the Raiders will
    be victorious 30-27.
    
    The Wizard
44.684GOT TO KEEP LAUGH'N!!!CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYWed Sep 26 1990 20:5512
    
     Carlos So you Admitt your Beloved Raiders DO NOT HAVE A QB! Ha ha ha :-)
     I'm glad to see you take some sort of objective veiw of your
     Beloved Raiders Sometimes in these notes it seems like people are so
     stuck on there team being winners they can't see there teams weakness
     or at least won't admitt it. That's one for......:-)
    
    
     P.S. By the way that's " THE DREWSKI " :-)
    
    
    
44.685If you thought that was funny.....!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustThu Sep 27 1990 13:0932
    
    	In yesterdays USA Today they had the AFC team-by-team statistics,
    and within those stats. they have QB ratings based on: Att, Cmp,
    Cmp%, Yds, Avg/a, TD's, TD%, Int, Int%, and Lg. Here's how the AFC
    QB's rated up to week 3:
                             
    			     NAME               RATE
    			------------------  -------------
    			1st  Grogan             98.6
    			2nd  DeBerg             93.3
    			3rd  Kelly              89.1
    	*******		4th  SCHROEDER          88.7        *******
    			5th  Boomer             81.9
    	*******     	6th  ELWAY              81.2        *******
    			7th  O'Brien            78.4
    			8th  Moon               77.9
    			9th  Tolliver           67.9
    		       10th  Krieg              66.9
    		       11th  Marino             65.4
    		       12th  Kosar              58.4
                       13th  Brister            53.8
                       14th  George             43.9
                                                         
    
    	So you see Drewski, even though the Raiders weakest point is
    their QB, he is still better than most, including Mr. Magoo. Hope
    my continued objective opinion has given you a few more laughs cause
    I know when I see these stats. and think of all the misled Donk
    fans out there, it's enough to keep me rolling. 8-)
    
    Carlos
    
44.686FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu Sep 27 1990 13:204
    The rating system you site isn't USA Today's, it's the offical NFL
    rating system.
    
    John
44.687biting the hand that feeds himGENRAL::WADEBye bye Ms. American PieThu Sep 27 1990 13:426
    Carlos,
    
    	You shouldn't be bad mouthing Elway like that.  He gave
    	the Raiders their first victory.
    
    Claybone
44.688Don't read too much into statsBSS::JCOTANCHTheGreatAmericanDream: ND goes 0-11Thu Sep 27 1990 13:507
    Carlos, this system rates passers, not quarterbacks.  Therefore, it
    doesn't take into account such very important qualities such as
    rushing, ability to scramble, ability to throw on the run, leadership,
    etc.  You would have to agree that Grogan isn't even one of the top 7
    or 8 best QB's in the AFC, let alone the best.
    
    Joe
44.689CSC32::J_HERNANDEZJump back!!! What's that sound?Thu Sep 27 1990 14:553
    Carlos has the makings of a Hoot or a Monty. Twisted Dastistics and
    biases he chooses to cite as da FACKS (tm). Carlos, pat yerself on the
    back, u is Hall of Fame bound.
44.690ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustThu Sep 27 1990 15:024
    
    Yeah, ......but day iz da facks, bruvah!
    
    Cahlos
44.691GOT TO KEEP LAUGH'N......CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYThu Sep 27 1990 16:5910
    
    Carlos, I can't stop laugh'n at you dude...Ha ha ha 
     Your telling me based on those  dats that Roeder-head is 
     better than Boomer and Elway and Moon and Marino and Kosar?
     I'm laugh'n so hard I'm about to break a Rib....Ha ha ha
    
    
    
     " THE DREWSKI " 
    
44.692ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustThu Sep 27 1990 17:199
    
    Well I don't know about Marino, Moon, and Boomer, but I think he's
    just as good as Kosar and Magoo, in his own right. He may not be
    able to scrammble as well as Magoo, but then again Magoo can't launch
    it like Schroeder can either.  Sure, sure, I know Magoo has a strong
    arm, but there is no one better than Schroeder with the bomb. Which
    is perfect for the Raiders style of play.
    
    Carlos
44.693BSS::JCOTANCHTheGreatAmericanDream: ND goes 0-11Thu Sep 27 1990 17:406
    So *maybe* Schroeder can throw the ball longer than Elway (standing
    still) but that doesn't make him a better QB than Elway.  Or even
    close, for that matter.  Also, I'm not very high on Kosar, but if I had
    a choice between Schroeder and Bernie, I'd take Bernie in a second.
    
    Joe
44.694Elway's a bumCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meThu Sep 27 1990 18:007
 And if I had a choice between Jay and "the duke" I'd take Jay. ELWAY'S
 way to prone to interceptions besides being a big crybaby. Jay maybe
 full of himself but he doen't cry when things don't go his way he takes it
 like a man...

 mike
44.695" ELWAY = RIGHT WAY "CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYThu Sep 27 1990 18:1523
     
    Okay Carlos now I see where you're coming from, the stats have 
    nothing to do with Elway vs Roeder-head. Because if you base it
    on stats then Elway is better then Mario,Moon,Kosar. When you 
    Said the phrase " I think " opened my understanding that you just 
    don't like Elway cause there's no way Roeder-head is better or even
    as good as Elway. Put Elway and Roeder-Head on the Trade wire and see 
    which one of them would the Raiders like to have. Look if you don't like 
    Elway Just says you don't like him But to try and us stats to say he's 
    not one of the best QB in the NFL is........(Well I Guess Your Opinion).  
    I know Bro.Al would pick Elway because Elway Follows his Motto
    " just win Baby " even if it don't look good " just win baby "
    
    
    P.S. Bro. AL did try and get Elway from the Colts when he first came
         out of College offered a lot for him but the Colts gave he to 
         Denver for 1st and some cash I think.
    
    
    
     " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
44.697The shame of itDELNI::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 27 1990 18:3419
    
  > OH YEAH, WHO WON "THE NFL QUARTERBACK CHALLENGE" THAT WAS 
  > ON TV LASTED SUNDAY (BUT WAS TAPED OVER THE SUMMER) WHEN I 
  > TURNED IT ON IT WAS WARREN MOON TRYING TO HIT A GOLF CART THAT
    
    I saw part of that while flicking through the channels, and it has
    to be the most ridicalus TV trashsport event ever held.  At one point
    where they were throwing at these big receiver targets with a
    couple of mean defenders thrown in for effect, Bill Walsh, in all 
    seriousness, was saying stuff like: "Did you see that!  Moon had a 
    hard time reading that man.  That's the same problem he has with 
    defenses in the NFL.  Just not quick enough on the read..."
    
    It's a long, hard fall from head coach of the best football team in the
    free world to network sports prostitute, I guess.  What an
    embarrassment...
    
    glenn
     
44.698ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustThu Sep 27 1990 19:3618
    
    I agree Glenn, that QB challenge was a joke. Although all of the
    QB's were exposed to the same circumstances, the circumstances 
    weren't very realistic. There is a big difference in throwing to
    a golf cart that is going ten mph (or whatever it is golf carts do 
    nowadays) and a WR such as Gault flying down the field getting faster 
    as he goes. Same goes for the 20' by 20' billboards they had moving 
    across the field (at different distances) with a basketball sized 
    bullseye in the middle, I think Moon is the only one to even hit any 
    of these, and it wasn't anywhere near to the bullseye. The distance
    test was won by Schroeder (throwing 76yds), with little effort, and 
    it consisted of the QB's starting in the endzone and running up to the 
    goal line and launching it downfield as far as they could. It was
    surprising, but alot of the older QB's did real well on these tests.
    All in all though it was bunk, and not a very good indicator.
    
    Carlos
                                                      
44.699A matter of opinion, not statsCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanThu Sep 27 1990 19:4615
      re-mike,   Shroeder (sp?) not a cry baby??  Did you forget what got
    him traded from the REdskins in the 1st place?  Let me refresh your
    memory (and mine).
    
      Gibbs benched Jay for Doug Williams, so Jay cried and cried until 
    Gibbs & co. considered trading him, even after williams got hurt, 
    if I remember it.  Jay just kept saying he could start for about any
    team in the NFL, but he!!, he couldn't even beat Buerlin out of a job
    in Faiderville until Buerlin's holdout this year.  Actually, I'm
    suprised Shell hasn't tried Steve yet, 'cause Jay isn't really playing
    that great, regarless of the 3-0 record.  The LA/OAK defense is whats
    been the dominating factor in the victories (IMO).
    
    		Tim
    
44.700CSC32::SALZERThu Sep 27 1990 23:4010
    That list of qb rankings is not worth the paper it's printed on.
    It never has been but the topic surfaces anually as food for debate.
    OK Carlos. Let's put it another way.  If you had your choice of 
    Schroeder or any number of the other names to choose as your qb,
    how many would be ahead of Jay?  I would hope the list would be 
    medium to long. Now if I had to select for starters ahead of Elway,
    you could count them on 2 fingers, maybe. Believe me, Shroeder is not
    one of them.
    
    BoB
44.701Johnny intysCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meFri Sep 28 1990 10:2013
 Seems to me all Jay was doing was telling everybody he was better than Doug
 and he should be the starter. Not the same as I don't want to play for you
 so if you don't trade me I'll go play baseball like ole Johnny boy. And Jay
 was a decent a baseball player as well. Besides I've never seen Jay spike a
 ball or cry after a bad play....

 Well Bob you may have only two fingers but try these for size

	Montana, Marino, Eiasion, Cunningham, Simms, Testerverdi,Rypien
        Moon just to name a few.....

mike
44.703ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustFri Sep 28 1990 12:4118
    
    When Schroeder demands to be played or traded he's a whiner, but
    when Magoo's doing the crying it's a shrewd business agreement.
    Go figure... 
    
    >If you had your choice of Schroeder or any number of the other
    >names to choose as your qb, how many would be ahead of Jay? I would
    >hope the list would be medium to long. 
    
    It would probably be medium, but I guarantee Elway wouldn't be on
    it. It would probably look something similar to the list Mike asked
    you to count on both of your fingers. On the other hand if Elway was 
    my QB and I was asked to make a list of QB's that I'd rather have,
    it too would be medium, but Schroeder would more than likely be on 
    this list.   8-)
    
    Carlos
    
44.704 Wassop with Dyal ? PLANIT::KUMARAshishFri Sep 28 1990 12:4813
    
     Dudes,
    
     Sorry to butt in like this, but like, can i get a quick update on Raider
     tight end Mike Dyal, he is my fantasy football starting tight end, and 
     he was put on injury reserve a couple of days before week 3.
     
     Is he still on ir, what's the injury, when can we expect him back, 
     any info would be appreciated,
    
     later,
    
    Ashman.
44.707ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustFri Sep 28 1990 13:358
    I think Steven's right about IR being six weeks. Look for Howie,
    Bo, and Dyal to rejoin the Raiders right around the 'bye' time (wk.8).
    'Though I think Bo will probably start a week or two sooner. The
    Raiders are off to a great start, and with the return of these three
    knuckleheads, they should be even tougher down the stretch.
    
    Carlos
     
44.708Where's HOOT ?KAOFS::R_OBASFri Sep 28 1990 14:425
    
    I thought this is the place to ask.
    
    ric
    
44.709CAM::WAYHappiness is a loose ruckFri Sep 28 1990 14:5714
>    I thought this is the place to ask.
>    
>    ric


Ric --

I don't see any smilies, so I'm assuming you're serious.  HOOT and
Monty both took the severance package several months ago...

Somehow it ain't quite the same.....8^(

'Saw    

44.710I did'nt know !KAOFS::R_OBASFri Sep 28 1990 15:077
    Saw,
       I was serious, I did'nt know. You're right it's different. At this
    time of Football season, there's always BIG argument between Hoot and 
    Steven (well Carlos is filling up the gap, not as good as Hoot but....)
    
    ric
      
44.711HOME SWEET HOMEWMOIS::E_FASSETTFri Sep 28 1990 15:084
    The Raiders streak in the coliseum cintinues sunday.
    Los Angeles Raiders- 24
    Chicago Bores-       17
    
44.712Another Friday of fun;^COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanFri Sep 28 1990 15:3614
      Get tougher at week 8??   The faiders are peaking right now, and by
    the time week 8 roles around, they will have at least 2-3 loses and
    going more downhill from there.
    
      Everyone is P&M (tm) about the QBs, so what about Buerlin?  He held
    out of camp.  At least Elway has had more class than that.....
    
    
      Also,  What week last year did Shell take over?  Someone told me he
    is undefeated as a head coach, and I don't think thats right.  I could
    of sworn that Shanahan was canned week 4, and Shell took the helm at
    week 7 or 8.
    
    		Tim
44.714QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Fri Sep 28 1990 15:4922
   Well... everyone's entitled to an opinion (except Mike Childs, who is
   biased ;'D)

   When it comes to QB's, who you would place in front of who depends a
   lot on which team(s) you're a fan of.

   Something worth noticing:
   Bronco bashers `wouldn't have Elway on the list.' That's okay. 

   But...With the exception of the Forty-Niners, most fans would probably
   place another QB in place of the individual who is their current QB.

   As a Bronco fan, and realizing that whatever QB I opted for would be
   dealing with the same supporting group that Elway has now, I cannot
   think of a single QB I would rather have in his place. That's right.
   Including Montana. But....  I'd let him be Elway's backup instead of
   Kubiak.

   And no, Schroeder wouldn't be on the list if I had to pick the QB's I'd
   like to see as Elway's backup (Kubiak WOULD be on the list).

   Mike JN
44.716FMCSSE::BROWNWhiskey River's don't run DryFri Sep 28 1990 16:3516
    re carlos and qb's
    
    
       IMHO. BEING NEITHER A RAIDER OR A BRONCO FAN.  Your idea that Jay S.
    is better that Mr. Ed is a pure lack of knowledge of the game. Elway
    has some talent, Jay has none. The only reason I can find for Al Davis
    signing him is out of desperation. Being able to throw the ball a mile
    don't mean zip, if you can't read a defense or find the guy that open.
    It would be my guess that the kid from ND will be replacing Jay-boy
    in the near future and the raiders will be in a better position whne he
    does.
    
    Bring George Blanda back Please!!
    
    Cadzilla
    
44.717not a fitAIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentFri Sep 28 1990 16:473
    Hasn't Hebert been in for a look with the Raiders once before (outta
    college maybe)?  Seems to me that The Ragin' Cajun is more a short-pass
    guy.  That just ain't the Raiders game.
44.718ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustFri Sep 28 1990 17:0922
    
    Well Cadzilla, your'e certainly entitled to your opinion. But to
    say that Elway has some talent and Jay has none, IMHO is not only
    a lack of football knowledge, but not very good common sense either.
    If he didn't have any talent there is no way on God's green earth
    that he could be a QB in the pros, much less a starter. This debate
    can go on all season long, and I'll never be able to convince a
    Donk fan (even with the support of stats) that Schroeder is better than
    Elway, or likewise will they convince me of the opposite. I know
    Jay is not the best QB around, but the point I was trying to make
    with the stats and all, is that neither is Elway. (Drewski and the
    gang are constantly blamming Schroeder (kinda like I do to Elway)and
    I thought it would be fun to show them that statistically, there
    hero is rated worse than Schroeder)Matter of fact, I think he's highly 
    over rated simply because of his ability to scrammble. Personally I
    think he developed this ability as a result of being so scared to
    get hit that instead he decided to do the manly thing and run for 
    his life.
                                                                   
    
    Carlos
    
44.719see a Donk fan, pull his chainCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meFri Sep 28 1990 17:239
Elway a wuss he's been know to cry on the sidelines after losses. Terry
Bradshaw was right on the money about the overrated slingshot artist
who couldn't read a defense with a primer! I do like his touch passes
though, they always seem to end up in the opposition's hands....

and that's my opinion JN!!!   ;^)  hahahaaaa

mike
44.720No donk fans hereFMCSSE::BROWNWhiskey River's don't run DryFri Sep 28 1990 17:2812
    
    Well carlos
    
      My reference to talent had to do with the other Qb's within the NFL.
    He's big, He's got a stong arm, but He counld'nt read a Good defense if
    Big Al's life depended on it. He's the starter because the kid from ND
    was a holdout. Also do not, I repeat do not call me a Donkco fan. Just
    because I consider Mr. Ed to be better that Jay-boy does not make me
    bleed orange.
    
    Cadzilla 8^)
    
44.721By the way Shell's record is: 10-5 ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustFri Sep 28 1990 17:4720
    >but he couldn't read a Good defense if Big Al's life depended on
    >it.
    
    Well, they don't come much better than Chicago's, so I guess we'll
    just have to wait and see how he does against them.
    
    >He's the starter because the kid from ND was a holdout.
    
    He didn't hold out last year, and I believe Schroeder was the starter
    than too. However it didn't last too long.
    
    >  ,I repeat do not call me a Donkco fan.
    
    Sorry if my reply was confusing I can see how you'd be insulted, but 
    I didn't specifically call you one nor did I mean to imply that. It 
    was pretty clear by your reply that you supported neither. 
    
        
    Carlos
    
44.722We'll wait and see, okay!!FMCSSE::BROWNWhiskey River's don't run DryFri Sep 28 1990 17:569
    
    
    okay Carlos
    
      I'll lay off of Jay-Boy. If he can get 300 yd's against Bear's, he 
    has some talent, otherwise I'll still consider him a no talent stiff
    holding the Raiders down.
    
    Cadzilla
44.723ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustFri Sep 28 1990 18:206
    If he gets 300 yds against the Bears, which right now are #2 against
    the pass and limited Krieg to only 74 yds, he better have more than
    some talent. I think even the Montanas and Marinos of the world
    would have a hard time filling that order.
    
    Carlos
44.724Youz guyzCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanFri Sep 28 1990 18:264
      Does this mean that you guys aren't going to meet in the parking lot
    after work??;;;;;^^^^^^
    
    		Tj
44.725You tell meFMCSSE::BROWNWhiskey River's don't run DryFri Sep 28 1990 18:417
    
    No comments from the cheap seats please!!  I don't hear any of you Donk
    fan in here sticking up for Mr.ED. What gives? Is Jay-boy truly better
    than John (Who could eat corn through a picket fence) Elway?
    
    
    Cadzilla 8^)
44.726HOLD ON THERE!!!CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYFri Sep 28 1990 19:5817
    
    
    >What gives? I'm begining to think Roeder-Head(tm) is Truly better
     than ELway?
    
     There is only 1 QB in the leauge That's better than Elway (IMO)
     and I think you know who that is without a Doubt.
    
     I'm getting tired of this Roeder-Head vs Elway I think we all know
     the truth of the matter but Just one more Thing, Who get's paid ($)
     the most Elway or Roeder-Head. I think that has something to do with
     how good you are also.
    
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
    
44.727Hoot and Monty we need ya they're out of controlCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meFri Sep 28 1990 20:1922
    
>     There is only 1 QB in the leauge That's better than Elway (IMO)
>    and I think you know who that is without a Doubt.
 
	I've already named 5 or 6 you want more?
   
>     I'm getting tired of this Roeder-Head vs Elway I think we all know
>    the truth of the matter but Just one more Thing, Who get's paid ($)
>    the most Elway or Roeder-Head. I think that has something to do with
>     how good you are also.
    
 
	Well you can fool some of the people some of the times and some of    
        of the people all of the time. Denver fans are the later where the
    	Duke is concerned. The guy had a career year and signed a big contract
        right after that. Hey if Bowlan wants to waste his money it ain't my
        concern.................

  many smiles

 mike

44.728CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYFri Sep 28 1990 20:392
    
    
44.729 4-0 ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustMon Oct 01 1990 11:1110
    The Bears ain't nothin! Raider defense shut the Bears down, and
    I think that they've scored more TD's then they've allowed. The
    running game also had a good day against the Bears #2 defense, running
    for 156 yds. Schroeder got the job done by getting 170 yds on 8 
    receptions. Can't say enough about the defense though, they sacked
    the Harbaugh 6 times for 66 yds. Better watch out Kelly, the Raiders
    are coming.
    
    Carlos
    
44.730THE SILVER AND BLACK IS BACK !!!!EARRTH::BROOKSTwo snaps, a twist, and a kiss!Mon Oct 01 1990 12:004
    Schroeder is near-deity !!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    GO RAIDERS !!!!!
44.731Still 12 weeks leftCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanMon Oct 01 1990 13:199
      re-1
    
      Are you jumpin' on the ole' bandwagon again??
    
      The have only played 4 games, and was able to dominate 1 of them,
    which was yesterday.  I was suprised at the Bear D, but not the Bears
    O.
    
    		Tim
44.732708-303-9944 x2740AIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentMon Oct 01 1990 13:287
    Neal Anderson:  6 carries.  26 yards.  No receptions.
    
         I called the Chicago Bears Line on Friday to see if Neal was playing 
    but there was no mention of his condition.  There was supposed to be an 
    updated report before Sunday but I didn't call back.
    
         Anyone have more news on Anderson's health?
44.734EARRTH::BROOKSTwo snaps, a twist, and a kiss!Mon Oct 01 1990 13:364
    Hardly .... look at where I picked the Raiders - t be right there for
    the AFC West title. I probably won't get behind them again until they
    return to Oakland (my hometown), but it's good to know that Art Shell
    has managed to bring a little of Oakland to LA.
44.735re. AndersonELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustMon Oct 01 1990 13:387
    Don't know how well he was doing before the game, but I know he's
    hating life today, 'cause he took a shot to the ribs/back at the
    start of the second half yesterday and was real slow getting up. 
    Don't think he played much after that.
    
    Carlos            
    
44.736UPWARD::HEISERultimate, underlyin', no denyin' motivationMon Oct 01 1990 14:177
    I watched about 1 quarter of this game yesterday.  Schroeder(sp?) looks
    very much improved.  Mike White has done a lot for Jay's game!
    
    This just might be the missing link they needed.  Everyone knows that
    the QB spot was their only weak link.
    
    Mike
44.737DASXPS::KHARRISTue Oct 02 1990 13:1111
    Here's one Raider fan who believes that Elway is much better than
    Schroeder. However, over the last couple of games, Schroeder has
    done everything the Raiders want him to do. 8-15 for 176 yds. are
    very good #'s if thats what the offense is asking of you. With the
    running game that the Raiders have,Bo's almost ready, thier passing
    attack opens up deep. Schroeder averaged 22yds. a completion against
    the Bears. Either way the RAIDERS are 4-0. Bring on the Bills.
    
                                              Kenn
    
    BTW-Aarron Wallace looks great!!!!
44.738ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustTue Oct 02 1990 14:1911
    Kenn, how much did Drewski and the gang pay you for -1.  :-)
    
    >Much better?????? 
    
    No way, I could see if you thought he was a little better, but not
    'much better', sorry Kenn. Another point in the Schroeder-Elway
    controversy. As Mike just pointed out, Schroeder's being helped
    by Mike White and is improving weekly, while Elway seems to have lost
    a step or two over the years, and is on the decline.
    
    Carlos
44.739'nuff said??COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Oct 02 1990 17:371
      Lets see who makes it to the Hall 'o Fame....
44.740ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustWed Oct 03 1990 11:257
    Oh noooo! Not the Elway and the H.o.F. thing again....
                                             |
                                             |
                                            \|/
                    .....or should it be  (dream)   
    
    Carlos
44.741COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanWed Oct 03 1990 13:372
      Yeh, that is an old one from last year,  but Carlos , you still
    couldn't answer it ;^
44.742huh?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustWed Oct 03 1990 14:104
    Sorry Tim, but I'm not to sure about what it is that you want me
    to answer, re.739, sounds more like a statement than a question.
       
    Carlos
44.743OTOTWCSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYWed Oct 03 1990 19:1711
    
    Well, It looks like the Raiders are ON TOP OF THE WORLD right now.
    4 wins no loses and it looks like Roeder-Head is starting to improve.
    Not bad for having played 3 of the 4 games at Home.
    
    
    P.S How is it the Raiders Open and Close the Season at Home???
        
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
44.744SorryBOSOX::KHARRISThu Oct 04 1990 08:3910
    Carlos,
              I feel that Elway is much better because he led a Denver
    team that is not that spectacular to 3 Super Bowls. When your defense
    allows the points that thiers did in the SB's, there is not much
    any single player could do about it. Although I have always been
    a Schroeder fan, I don't believe that he has played to his abilities.
    If the Raiders had Elway they would be almost unstoppable. It's
    just my oppinion.
    
                                       Kenn
44.745FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu Oct 04 1990 10:0822
    re:  Why the Raiders open and close on at home?  Why not?
    
    Besides the Raiders, the Falcons, Patriots, Bengals, Skins, Bears and
    Saints do to.
    
    Opening and closing on the road are the Colts, Rams, Jets, Steelers,
    Chargers, Eagles and Niners.
    
    Opening at home and closing on the road are the Bills, Packers, Chiefs,
    Browns, Cowboys, Lions and Giants.
    
    Opening on the road and closing at home are the Broncos, Oilers,
    Dolphins, Vikings, Cardinals, Seahawks and Bucs.
    
    There are 7 teams in each category.
    
    No grand conspiracy here.  The NFL does try to balance out the schedule
    with a couple of exceptions due to weather.  For example, Phoenix
    opened with 3 straight road games and closes with 3 straight home
    games.  
    
    John
44.746They should be unstopable soonNEST::PAPIAThu Oct 04 1990 13:497
    
    	I think when the Raiders get Bo they will be unstopable!!!
    The defense is going to have to respect Bo, so with the speed
    they have at WR they will be real hard to stop.
     
    
    Vinny
44.747STAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in 1991Thu Oct 04 1990 13:527
    re .746:
    
    With the KC Royals season now over, how soon is Bo expected to be in the
    Raiders' lineup?
    
    
    py
44.748STARVU::MACGREGORDECview3D engineer - DTN 287-3318Thu Oct 04 1990 13:533
    Bo's return is due in 10 days or so.  Week 6.
    
    The Wizard
44.749Bo's gonna know Superbowls !ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustThu Oct 04 1990 15:187
    If the Raiders keep playing at their present level, or better due
    to the return of Bo, Howie and Dyal, they could very possibly have
    Superbowl victories in three decades. Giving new meaning to the
    term threepeat. 
    
    Carlos
    
44.751AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Oct 04 1990 15:564
    	Wrong note Steven.  All discussions about the bet Dan and I
    allegedly made are to be conducted in the PittsburgH Pirate note.
    
    				/Don
44.753AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Oct 04 1990 16:212
    	Public Drunkeness?  You mean you can be arrested for that? 
    8^)
44.754oh, man...AIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentThu Oct 04 1990 16:538
    RE: Three Super Bowls in three decades.
    
         I see Carlos has been taking night courses at the Hal Whitehair
    Institute for Pathetic Rationalization.
    
         Granted just winning 3 Super Bowls is a nifty achievement but
    comparing winning one every 10 years to winning 3 in a row is pushing
    it a shade; wouldn't you say?
44.755PFSVAX::JACOBFour down and No O J_eThu Oct 04 1990 17:078
>>         I see Carlos has been taking night courses at the Hal Whitehair
>>    Institute for Pathetic Rationalization.
    
    
    Better (tm) that before somebody beats you to it.
    
    JaKe
    
44.756CSC32::SALZERThu Oct 04 1990 22:215
    It's that time aghain Raider fans. Bo returns. Other than an 
    occasional respectable game and crowd pleasing run here and there,
    I ask this simple question. So what?  
    
    BoB
44.757Bo Is Awesome!DECXPS::KHARRISFri Oct 05 1990 10:359
    Bo ran for over 900 yards last year in 10 games. He averaged over
    5 yards a carry as well. How come people try to belittle everything
    that Bo does. If he played 16 games a year he would be the best
    back in football!!!!!!!!!!!! I can't name a back that has the
    combination of speed an power that Bo has. 
    
    I like the Raiders by 1 this weekend, 21-20.
    
                                      Kenn
44.758Thats what!!!NEST::PAPIAFri Oct 05 1990 10:537
    
    1989           Att.     Yds.     Avg.     Lng.     Tds
    
    Jackson,Bo     173      950      5.5      t92       4
    
    
    	10 games 5th in the AFC in rushing.
44.760Buffalo by 8CAM::MAZURIt ain't the meat, it's the lotion.Fri Oct 05 1990 11:189
   You may ask why are the Raiders getting three points against the
   Bills ?
    
   Because they'll need every one (and more).
    
    Buffalo by 8 !
    
    -Paul Mazur
    Buffalo fan !
44.761HE plays the Blues too :^)NEST::PAPIAFri Oct 05 1990 11:197
    
    	W-L is a team effort, stats aside Bo is a walking
    highlight film, the guy is unreal to watch, football
    or baseball.
    
    
    Vinny
44.762EARRTH::BROOKSTwo snaps, a twist, and a kiss!Fri Oct 05 1990 11:562
    Go do some work Paul ... the Bills are wusses and the Silver and Black
    are back !!!!!
44.763They're good but not good enough on SundayCAM::MAZURIt ain't the meat, it's the lotion.Fri Oct 05 1990 12:2715
44.764Go bills...just for sunday nite of courseCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanFri Oct 05 1990 13:168
      The faider defense can score also, just look at the faider bronco
    game there.  The d scored 2 td's and won the game from that, 'cause
    their offense sucked.   And of course the broncos were just trying to
    find a way to lose the game, not win, just the same as they did in
    Buffalo and almost did in the KC and seachickens games.  Oh, thats
    another subject.
    
    	Tim
44.765 PICK OF THE WEEKWMOIS::E_FASSETTFri Oct 05 1990 16:476
    Give me a break. Buffalo a good offense and a good defense. The Raiders 
    defense will dominate the Bills offense. also the Raiders offense has 
    been getting better the last few weeks. 
    
    Los Angeles Raiders- 24
    Buffalo Bills-       10
44.766WOW ! Great game !!CAM::MAZURIt ain't the meat, it's the lotion.Mon Oct 08 1990 00:0810
    >...That just leaves offense as the deciding factor.  But Buffalo
    >has an advantage here.  They have a defense that can score...
    >...Let me re-ascert myself, Buffalo by 8...
    
    Oh geez!!!  My apology.  I erred.  Buffalo by 14.  Please accept
    my apology.  At least I was right about the Bills defense.
    
    Seriously, the game was incredible.  Too bad Kelso but racked up.
    
    Till we meet in January (AFC Championship game, perhaps ?).
44.767So much for being Undefeated!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustMon Oct 08 1990 10:458
    Congrats to Bill fans, that was unbelievable. It was almost like
    watching the Donks-Bill game all over again. Now I know how the Donk
    fans must've felt getting robbed like that. The Raiders offense
    and defense dominated throughout the game right up until the last
    quarter, then the dam broke. Oh well, next up is the Seahawks, which
    should be a close game; They always play the Raiders tough.
    
    Carlos
44.768I'm all smiles!!!COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanMon Oct 08 1990 11:121
    
44.769CSC32::J_HERNANDEZDahlingItsBettaDownWhereItsWettaMon Oct 08 1990 11:593
    Actually teams need to find a way to let the Bills keep the ball in the
    4th quarter. That way they won't score so much.
    
44.770Deja Vu?BSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Mon Oct 08 1990 14:048
    Amazingly similar 4th quarter to last week's Bronco game.  A TD by the
    special teams, a TD by the defense, and a fumble by the Faiders leading
    to a Bills' score.  All after it seemed like the game was about over
    with the Faider boys up by 10 and about 10 minutes left in the game. 
    The Bills scored 24 points in 6:03.  Yes Faider fans, you now know how
    us Bronco fans felt last week. 
    
    Joe
44.772COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Oct 09 1990 13:341
      Steven,  LUV that personal name!!!!
44.773DASXPS::KHARRISTue Oct 09 1990 13:5412
    I thought there was good reasons why the Raiders lost. 1)no pass
    rush; 2)throwing too much; 3)poor special teams play. Schroeder
    looked great through out most of the game. Marcus was extremely
    effective early, and the D held thier own. All game the announcers
    said that Kelly felt he could hit Lofton deep, sure enough he did.
    It was a tough loss for the Raiders. Hopefully they will be able
    to slow down Derrick Fenner this weekend against Seattle.
    
                                  Kenn
    
    BTW- It's too bad what happened to Denver last night isn't it???
    HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!
44.774Marcus To The 49ers????BOSOX::KHARRISWed Oct 10 1990 11:279
    In todays National Sports Page, reports state that the 49ers are
    talking to the Raiders about aquiring Marcus Allen. The 49ers offered
    thier 1st round pick next year, while the Raiders are asking for
    a starting player. My guess would be Ronnie Lott. It also states
    that the Raiders would like to wait til' Monday to make any deal.
    I would like to think that the Raiders would be intersred in obtain-
    ing an OL or a LB in a trade.
    
                                       Kenn
44.775WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Oct 10 1990 11:342
       The trading deadline is nexted Tuesday I think.
                                       Denny
44.776 #1 -n- #2 ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustThu Oct 11 1990 15:4614
    According to yesterdays USA Today, Jay Schroeder is the AFC's best
    rated QB. .....I know, I know.. stats don't mean a thing, but last
    years stats for Jay were sad, and so was he....but not this year,
    his stats have improved greatly and so has he. The biggest change
    seems to be his self confidence, he also has more patience. (although
    this might be because the O-line has also improved and is giving him
    more time.) The biggest problem Jay has now is not Jay's problem,
    but the receivers', they seem to me, to be dropping a lot of passes that
    are well thrown, and should be caught. Unfortunately, this goes
    against Jay as an incomplete pass. Another impressive stat, is the
    Raiders defense, rated #2 in the AFC. They say that defense wins games,
    so the Raiders ought to win a lot more this season, with this defense.
                                                       
    Carlos                                          
44.777WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Oct 12 1990 09:143
       To show how much the 'top rated Qb' stat means:
    Steve Grogan had the honor after the 1st 3 weeks.
                                    Denny
44.778any news?BSS::MENDEZFri Oct 12 1990 18:346
    Has anybody heard anymore information on whether Marcus Allen will be
    traded to the 49ers?
    
    Frank 9er Mendez
    
    
44.779CSC32::SALZERFri Oct 12 1990 18:528
    The Allen trade was still just rumor as of yesterday afternoon.
    Raiders want a starter or 1st round pick. Meanwhile they 
    get a bargain for a back who's better days are behind him. 
    They also eliminate Marcus from the turmoil picture that Bo's
    return will bring. 
    Sounds like Al too. He's seen his best days as well.  
    
    BoB
44.780DASXPS::KHARRISSat Oct 13 1990 12:3912
    The Raiders asked for Charles Haley in return for Allen. Everybody
    seems to feel that the Raiders are asking for too much when they
    want a starter for Allen in a trade. Hershall Walker is worth 3
    #1's, 3-players, and a couple of other draft picks and Marcus is
    only worth 1 #1 from a championship team??????? Walker is 28 and
    Allen is 30.NO, I don't think that Walker was worth what the Vikings
    paid for him, however I do believe that Marcus is worth more than
    the 25th-28th pick in the draft.
    
    I like the Raiders this week 17-14.
    
                                                Kenn
44.781RAIDERS 24-SEAHAWKS 17.WLDWST::LSUSTAITAMon Oct 15 1990 03:288
    Go RAIDERS on a roll 5-1, SAN DIAGO IS NEXT.
                              RAIDERS 24
                             CHARGERS 10
    
    
                                        SILVER AND BLACK ARE BACK!
    
                                               later dudes......
44.782Where's Bo?CRUISE::JBONINJohn Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBAMon Oct 15 1990 10:388
    Did Bo Jackson make his comeback this week?
    
    
    
    
    
    
    John
44.783.833 pct.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustMon Oct 15 1990 12:457
    Not yet. Bo should make his debut this weekend against the Chargers.
    The Raiders are 3-0 within the division, but should have a tough
    game against San Diego. Raiders will win it though, 'cause the defense
    is playing good and so is the offense. The Chargers play great one
    week and sad the next. Raiders by +10. 
    
    Carlos
44.784BOSOX::KHARRISMon Oct 15 1990 16:0020
    With the Broncos playing as poorly as they are I've noticed a
    significant decline in replies in this conference. Credit must be
    given to the Raiders for thier outstanding play. Schroeder is playing
    better and better each week, and what more can be said about the
    offensive line. Everyone wanted to write Max Montoya off when the
    Raiders signed him saying he is over the hill. Now all he's doing
    is proving everyone wrong. Allowing 10 sacks in 6 games is great,
    and if I'm not mistaken, they allowed six in the game against the
    Bears.
    
    As much as I ripped Willie Gault he is sure making me put my foot
    in my mouth. The guy is playing great. Is there any news on when
    Gary Lewis is coming back??? Lets just hope that they continue palying
    as well as they have, and hope that K.C. drops off a little.
    
                                                  Kenn
    
    Raiders  24
    Chargers 21
    
44.785BSS::G_MCINTOSHVom Hochland German ShepherdsMon Oct 15 1990 18:055
    Kenn, it appears as if you're expecting a pretty good game this week
    when the Raiders travel down to San Diego.  A 24-21 victory for the
    Raiders sounds like a pretty close game.  I hope it is.
    
    Live from Charger Central.....Glenn
44.786REFINE::ASHEHomey don't play that...Mon Oct 15 1990 18:251
    How long is Mike Dyal out?
44.787Lets hope Glenn.COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanMon Oct 15 1990 20:034
      As long as the Charger o-line protects Billy-Joe,  then it will be
    close IMO.
    
      Tim
44.788Marcus taught Bo everything he knows.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOIn God we trustTue Oct 16 1990 11:3110
    re. Dyal, He got hurt around the first or second game and was placed
    on IR, which typically lasts six weeks, so he'll probably return
    around the 8th week along with Howie. In other Raiders news, Dennis
    Price cornerback was traded to the Jets for Alex Gordon linebacker.
    Glad to see they didn't trade Marcus Allen, he's one of those rare
    talents that can run, block, catch, and pass. Plus, I love it when
    the Raiders are on the goal line and Marcus goes flying over the
    top for the TD.
    
    Carlos 
44.789Trade Looks Good For The RaidersDASXPS::KHARRISTue Oct 16 1990 13:4015
    It's hard to believe that the Jets already gave up on Gordon. He
    was so highly thought of coming out of college. I think that it
    is a good move for the silver and black. There is talk that Greg
    Bell my be put on the IR to make room for Bo. Bell sprained his
    ankle last week. 
    
    Carlos, I agree that its better that they don't trade Marcus at
    this point. The team is playing to well to start dealing key
    contributors away.
    
    Glenn, I do believe that this will be a close game. S.D. has under-
    achieved all year. Maybe last week was thier coming out party. All
    of the AFC West divisional games seem to be close.
    
                              Kenn
44.790TradeBOSOX::KHARRISWed Oct 17 1990 08:144
    The Raiders traded Vann McElroy to the Seahawks for an undisclosed
    draft pick.
    
                          Kenn
44.791REFINE::ASHEHomey don't play that...Wed Oct 17 1990 13:111
    Did Bell go on the IR?
44.792Sorry, WaltMPO::MCFALLHe was born a pauper to a pawnWed Oct 17 1990 13:467
>    Did Bell go on the IR?

	Officially, not yet. Rumor is that he will be put on it to make
room for Bo, but it may not happen until Friday or Saturday.

	Jim M

44.793thanks...REFINE::ASHEHomey don't play that...Wed Oct 17 1990 13:564
    That's pretty inconsiderate, considering my supplemental draft is
    tonight and only guys on IR are allowed...
    
    -Walt
44.794CSC32::J_HERNANDEZI came, I saw, I freaked outWed Oct 17 1990 18:421
    I Bo gonna start? An inquiring ffl owner wants to know.
44.795That's a definite maybe....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Oct 18 1990 10:596
    Bo will probably play, but don't know if he'll be starting. Howie
    Long might also play this Sunday. He went out around week 2 with
    a broken toe and was expected to miss about six games.
    
    Carlos
    
44.796Wheres Bruce Wilkerson?NEST::PAPIAThu Oct 18 1990 11:028
    
    	If they traded McElroy then that should be an open spot
    for Bo. When Gordon,Long and Dyal come off IR then someone
    will have to go. Whats the story with Wilkerson? is he out
    for the year?
    
    
    Vinny
44.797BOSOX::KHARRISThu Oct 18 1990 11:494
    Wilkerson is supposed to see action this week against the Chargers.
    
    
                   Kenn
44.798 6-1 17135::CGRIEGOMon Oct 22 1990 11:238
    
    Marcus Allen caught three passes for 50-yds and rushed eight times
    for 45-yds to help send the Raiders past the Chargers, 24-9. Bo
    Jackson in his return from baseball, rushed for 53-yds and two
    touchdowns. And Jay Schroeder hit Willie Gault for an 8-yd touchdown.
    The Raiders defense held San Diego to three field goals.
    
    Carlos
44.799Bo Knows TD's!26748::KHARRISMon Oct 22 1990 13:5310
    The Schroeder critics keep eating crow. His numbers are consistent
    week in and week out. I don't like the idea of a week off before
    K.C. though. When things are going good you don't need to break
    it up. Bo comes in and does his usual run around the corner that
    noone seems to be able to stop. The offensive line is playing great.
    Aarron Wallace had a sack as well as Scott Davis. the young kids
    are playing well. Having K.C. fall 2 games behind is a big plus,
    thank you Seattle.
    
                                     Kenn
44.800CSC32::SALZERTue Oct 23 1990 17:114
    Well, we finally found something Bo don't know.
    Bo don't know english.
    
    BoB
44.801Bo has a real problem speaking.ELWOOD::DLANEBuild it and he will comeTue Oct 23 1990 17:227
    
    	Actually, Bo Jackson has a real speech impediment. His commercials
    take many many takes to get them right.
    
    
    								dana
    
44.802It used to be worse....SHARRA::J_PARSONSGeorge Stark: Not A Very Nice GuyTue Oct 23 1990 17:383
I can certainly attest to Bo's speech impediment, since I was in a sophomore
psychology class with him at Auburn around 1982. Actually, he speaks much better
now than he did then.
44.803Raiderology 101ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Wed Oct 24 1990 15:5343
    My predictions for the Raiders for the remainder of the season:
    
    at KC           	     The Chiefs are playing tough, and I figure
    			     that the Raiders are gonna split with them	 
                             this year. Each winning at home.
    
    Green Bay                Unlike most AFC teams, the Raiders don't
                             have a problem with NFC teams, as they
                             they are equally as big and tough on the
                             lines and like to run the ball. Raiders
                             will win this by at least 7.
    
    at Miami (Mon.)          Talk about '70's flashbacks, better break
                             out the bell-bottoms for this one. Raiders
                             have the best Monday Night record around,
                             but both teams are playing great this year.
                             Flip a coin.
    
    KC again                 See above.
    
    at Denver                The Donks are hurting so far....but......
                             ...with Magoo who knows. The Raiders should
                             win theoretically. But again flip a coin.
    
    at Detroit (Mon.)        Bo Jackson and Marcus Allen should have
                             a field day against the Lions struggling
                             defense. Raiders by +10.
    
    Cincinnati               Last year the Raiders creamed the Bengals
                             28-7. Should be interesting to see how
                             well Max Montoya does against his old 
                             team mates. The Bengals defense is the
                             worst in the AFC so far....Raiders by +7.
    
    at Minnesota             Raiders by 3.
    
    San Diego                Upset city....Chargers by 3.
                                                         
    
    Raiders end up around 11-5, and win the AFC West, and go on to win
    the Superbowl in a blowout over none other than SF.
    
    Carlos
44.804CSC32::J_HERNANDEZI love Kraf dinner!!Wed Oct 24 1990 16:489
    >>Raiders end up around 11-5, and win the AFC West, and go on to win
    >>the Superbowl in a blowout over none other than SF.
    
    Carlos,
    
    I'll send you my address and a check for whatever them drugs u is on
    are worth. %^)
    
    The Ratters (tm) will be gone by the first round of the playoffs.
44.805PNO::HEISERIbanez: the axe built to blast!Wed Oct 24 1990 17:525
    I agree with Carlos!  Nobody else is rising above the ashes in the AFC.
    Besides, the Raiders are the only team in the AFC that can beat the
    49ers in non-exhibition play.
    
    Mike
44.806not sure, butCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanWed Oct 24 1990 18:061
      Joe and his EGO didn't play in that exihibit game did they?
44.807Raiders Are For Real!DASXPS::KHARRISWed Oct 24 1990 18:2314
    There looks to be only one team in the AFC that the Raiders should
    be concerned with at this point, and that is Buffalo. They have
    a great D and thier offense is capable of putting up some big points.
    I don't know if Miami is for real yet. An earlier note pointed out
    the play of Lionel Washington and I must agree that he is very
    underrated. The Raiders stole him from St. Louis for i believe was
    a 3rd round pick. I would like to see the Raiders get another safety
    to go along with Eddie Anderson. Haqrden is alright but there is
    room for improvement.
    
    Home field will be a key in the playoffs, I don't think that they
    want to go play in Buffalo that late in the year. Lets go RAIDERS!!
    
                                              Kenn
44.808CSC32::J_HERNANDEZI love Kraf dinner!!Thu Oct 25 1990 12:282
    As much as I hate the Ratters (tm), it is kinda refreshing to see an
    AFC team be dominant. 1 question. How long 'til the bubble bursts.
44.809Bo's gonna know Superbowls !!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Thu Oct 25 1990 14:0611
    >There looks to be only one team in the AFC that the Raiders should
    >be concerned with at this point, and that is Buffalo.
    
    I disagree. Houston, KC, Miami, and Buffalo are all playing well.
    And Piitsburgh looks like they may wake up in time to get into the
    playoffs as well. Of these I think that Houston, KC, or Miami will
    be contending with the Raiders for the AFC Championship. And of
    these only The Raiders, Oilers, and Chiefs can compete with the
    NFC Champ.
    
    Carlos
44.810pining for the way it used to be...CNTROL::CHILDSLou Duffy's looking for change, spare changeThu Oct 25 1990 15:118
 I don't know about that Carlos, Pittsburg just gave the 49 ers all they could
 handle defensively. If it wasn't for a blackout and a costly fumble they're
 right there in the last two minutes of the game with a chance to win it.

 Really wouldn't it be great to see a Pitt/Raiders AFC championship game???

 mike
44.811Dolphins improved, but still inconsistentSTAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in 1991Thu Oct 25 1990 15:148
    re the notes on Miami:
    
    It'll depend on which Dolphin team shows up; the one that handled
    Buffalo with no problem, or the one that just squeaked by a struggling
    New England team.
    
    
    py
44.812We'll Find OutDASXPS::KHARRISThu Oct 25 1990 16:1415
    I don't feel that Miami has a consistent enough ground game to last
    in the playoffs. No ball control usually spells problems. I like
    Pittsburghs' D but I'm not to crazy about thier offense. Hoge and
    Worely will have to get it going again to be a force come playoff
    time. Kansas City has a tough D but they don't have any wide receivers
    to speak of. They have one of the leagues most dangerous backs in
    Okoye, but I feel that they lack team speed on offense. I feel Buffalo
    has a good D, Speed on offense, and a good running game. If they
    play consistently I definatley feel that they will be the Raiders
    toughesty opponent. Thats my own oppinion though. The jury is still
    out on Houston and the run and shoot. Can you last in the playoffs
    without a ground game???? I don't think so. I feel that Cincinnati
    poses more of a threat than Houston.
    
                                               Kenn
44.813Houston never will win the Central, eh Doc! SNDBOX::HAUSRATHToo many projects, not enough timeThu Oct 25 1990 17:278
    
    I agree with Kenn, even though Houston buried Cincy in their first 
    meeting they should still be considered favorites to take the Central
    and advance to the championship game.  All depends which team shows up 
    come playoff time.  After all they've got a LOT of home games coming 
    stretch time (last place schedule helps too!).
    
    /Jeff
44.814ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Thu Oct 25 1990 18:4717
    >The jury is still out on Houston and the run and shoot. Can you
    >last in the playoffs without a ground game?? I don't think so.
    >I feel that Cincinnati poses more of a threat than Houston.
    
    Au contraire mon fraire, Houston has proven that the run and shoot 
    works. They have the best offense in the NFL right now. The biggest
    difference between Cinci and the Oilers is not the offense (they
    both have great offenses) but, the defense, Cinci don't have one.
    As far as the ease of Cinci's schedule goes, three of their last
    five are on the road against Pitts, Raiders, and Houston and the
    other two home games are against San Fran. and Cleavland, not an
    easy schedule by any stretch. I agree with you about Miami's ground
    game, they started out real good but now they ain't nothing, it's
    been their defense thats been winning them for Miami lately.
    
    Carlos
    
44.815Watched too much "Back to the Beach" last night....DECWET::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Thu Oct 25 1990 18:5222
Most totally true dude. While Detroit proved that the Run and Shoot is a 
viable offense for the NFL (despite the protestations of Bill "super genius"
Walsh) Houston has taken it a step further due to their most excellent QB and
a bodacious set of wide receivers. If Houston had a RB of Barry Sanders quality
( like they are a dime a dozen right ) they would be almost totally unstoppable.
Even with the RB's they have now they are cranking up an offensive machine that
Jerry "glad he's gone" Glanville could only have wet dreams about.

However detroit has also proven that you still need a second half of a team
called a defense to win consistantly. Cinci will second this fact. The 
Oilers are going to go through the Jests like a hot knife through frozen
Yogurt and the Psuh-for-Youth will ride Givins and Hill to another FFL B 
victory...

I take back what I said about Warren Moon earlier this year. He has adjusted
well to the R & S. I just hope the pounding doesn't take too much time off
of his career. He isn't getting crushed as much as Peete et al because the
Oilers leave their RB's in to block more than Detroit..


Metz 
44.816EARRTH::BROOKSStraight - no chaser ...Thu Oct 25 1990 19:1921
    Thanks for that lasted paragraph Metz, you reminded me of something I
    neglected to mention in the Oiler note :
    
    The RB's, White in particular , were AWESOME blocking against the
    Bengals two weeks ago. Countless times I saw Francis coming in on the
    blitz, only to be picked up flawlessly by White, giving Moon that extra
    half-second.
    
    The Oiler's ground game is still somewhat disappointing, but improving.
    Thank God Moon is a super-mobile QB (2nd on the team in rushing, and
    averaging 4.8 yrds a carry) ....
    
    As for the Lions - Barry Sanders is a great RB, but the fack of the
    matter is that he is only an adquate blocker at best. Part of the
    problem is that he's 5'9", and while very string for his size, some
    LB's have been known to jump over him on a blitz. Another factor is the
    fact that he takes enough hits running, and you know that has to take
    something out of you.
    
    Now if you want to talk about the ultimate run and shoot back, let's
    talk about Walter Payton - he'd be illegal in it .....
44.817BOSOX::KHARRISFri Oct 26 1990 09:465
    I feel that Marcus Allen would be the prototype R&S back as well.
    I hate to be redundent but I can't see the R & S  being that effective
    in cold weather. We'll wait and see though.
    
                            Kenn
44.818my man Neal...CNTROL::CHILDSNever, hear surf music again...Fri Oct 26 1990 09:4813
 I don't know Doc, I think Neal Anderson would be even more illegal than 
 Payton in a R&S. If you remember last year, Detroit really didn't crank
 up the running game with Sanders until the last half of the season when
 defense were to concerned with the pass. I think we'll see the same thing
 in Houston. Teams are going to be so geared to stopping their passing
 attack the run will just be there. Especially when you consider Houston's
 OL, they should be able to run...

 and as the owner of Moon in the WAFFLE, I couldn't be happier. Especially
 considering 6 other QB's went before he did....

 mike
44.819CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RFri Oct 26 1990 09:5710
              <<< Note 44.814 by ELMAGO::CGRIEGO "Trust Jesus " >>>

>    As far as the ease of Cinci's schedule goes, three of their last
>    five are on the road against Pitts, Raiders, and Houston and the
>    other two home games are against San Fran. and Cleavland, not an
>    easy schedule by any stretch.
    
     The first Cincinnati-Houston game was shifted to Houston, I thought,
     because of the Reds' post-season experience.  If so, then the next
     one will be played in Cincinnati.
44.820EARRTH::BROOKSStraight - no chaser ...Fri Oct 26 1990 12:0618
    re .819
    
    Correct.
    
    re .818
    
    Mike, Anderson may be a better pure runner than Payton - certainly
    faster, but that can be said of many backs. I think that Payton's
    blocking and recieving skills would make him extremely lethal in the
    run and shoot. Anderson isn't 1-D, but he doesn't pancake linebackers
    the way I've seen Payton do it .... and yes, Marcus Allen is another
    back who would roll up some great numbers in a run and shoot. 
    
    OJ Simpson ? I might lose something in blocking, but giving the Juice a
    broken field on every play to operate in ? It ain't fair ....
    
    BTW, I don't worry about the run and shoot on a cold day, it's the
    *windy* days that worry any passing game, believe me ....
44.821CNTROL::CHILDSNever, hear surf music again...Fri Oct 26 1990 12:278
 Yeah Doc, maybe he doesn't pancake people with his blocking but he doesn't
 have too, to be effective and he's a very effective blocker. Receiving I'd
 say they're equal. Of the backs around the league now, I think that Cleveland
 Gary would really put up some super numbers with it and it would probably
 rescue/save Eric Metcalf's career...

 mike
44.822?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Fri Oct 26 1990 12:5910
    >He isn't getting crushed as much as Peete et al.......
    
    Why aren't the Lions utilizing Heisman Trophy winner Andre Ware?
    If he's their QB of the future it would seem like a good idea to
    get him in there and let him get some experience against NFL caliber
    defenses. The sooner he's in the middle of things, the faster he
    will come up to speed. I was hoping that the Raiders would've picked
    up Ware at the beggining of the season. 
    
    Carlos
44.824Smash the pumpkin (tm)CNTROL::CHILDSNever, hear surf music again...Fri Oct 26 1990 13:2313

>      Besides, they play real defense in the NFL.

 Correct amundo Steven and 8 years later Big Bad John still doesn't know how
 to read one....

 ;^)

      
  
    

44.826I see steven is a big simpsons fan also ????DECWET::METZGERQuoth the raven,&quot;Eat my shorts&quot;Fri Oct 26 1990 14:0911
They brought Ware in for a few series 2 weeks ago. I think It'll take him
some time to get used to Detroit's R & S offense and get in sync with the
recievers they have there....

Either that he or he hopelessly overrated as a QB :-)

It will be sink or swim time for him next year....


Metz
44.827EARRTH::BROOKSStraight - no chaser ...Fri Oct 26 1990 14:5621
    re .824
    
    Good shot !
    
    The run and shoot takes a long time to master - and the Lions are in no
    hurry to rush him. There are a lot more defenses in the NFL to master
    than in college.
    
    re Mike,
    
    Glanville, to his credit, wanted Metcalf in the draft, but the Oilers
    went for defense. Oh well ..... 
    
    But he would be tough in that offense, not that strong between the
    tackles, or blocking, but he'd be greased lighting ...
    
    Idea : Why doesn't some team bring back Don Coryell as an O.C. ??? He
    can't coach defense to save his life (San Fran should give the Chargers
    some SB rings (remember Dean, Keltcher, and Johnson ?)), but the man
    could bulid an offense, and with the exception of James Brooks, knew
    how to get the most out of his talent.
44.828Just Win Baby!!!!!!!ROYALT::FORGETTue Oct 30 1990 16:578
    
    
    
       Are Boys the Raiders will be taking on the Chiefs this Sunday.
    It should be an exciting games.  The Raiders will be on top.....
    
    
    Mike
44.829COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanThu Nov 01 1990 14:501
      The girls in black are going' down to the scalpers!!!!!!!
44.830Raid, Pillage, and Plunder!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Fri Nov 02 1990 16:5612
    The only ones goin down (for the fifth time) are those Donk sissys!  :-)
    
    Raiders 7-1
    KC      4-4
    Seattle 4-4
    Donks   3-5                                                             
    SD      3-6                            
    
    Carlos
    
    
    
44.831Raiders still lead the division, thoughMPO::MCFALLShe's myyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy babyMon Nov 05 1990 11:5717
>    Raiders 7-1 X
>    KC      4-4 X
>    Seattle 4-4 X
>    Donks   3-5 C                                                           
>    SD      3-6 X                           
    
    Carlos, one out of 5 ain't bad :^)

	Raiders  6-2
	Chiefs   5-3
	Chargers 4-5
	Broncos  3-5 
	Seahawks 3-5
	
    Better luck next week,

	Jim M
44.832good game sunday morn, had good ending to8269::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanMon Nov 05 1990 18:531
      I guess Bo knows fumbles ;^^
44.833Oh well...we're still #1 !17135::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Tue Nov 06 1990 13:0115
    Congrats to Chief fans. I figured the Raiders would have a hard
    time in K.C. (see .803). After watching the game I gotta say that
    the Raider Defense is the baddest, holding the Chiefs to 32 total
    yds in the first half, and holding them to 3 field goals, 2 of which
    were a direct result of an offensive fumble (ala Bo), and a blocked
    punt (ala Lewis?) which turned the ball over to K.C. with excellent
    field position in the first half. The third also resulted from a turn
    over late in the game. The Raiders were just about to score again
    when they turned the ball over, and KC took it back far enough to score
    the last field goal. The weather was a definite factor for both
    teams on Sunday; It was cold and rainy. I think if the Raiders would
    have run the ball a little more than they did they could have won
    it.(JMHO) Raiders will win the Pack by 7.
    
    Carlos
44.834Its in LA, right?8269::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Nov 06 1990 17:125
      re-1  Should be a good game against the Pack.  If the Pack can get
    any kind of running game going, then the boys from LA will lose, and if
    they don't then ????
    
    		Tim
44.83517135::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Tue Nov 06 1990 18:1414
    Tim, It will be played in L.A.. As far as the Packs running game
    goes, is Brent Fullwood still their leading rusher? Also, I don't
    think that the Raiders Defense will have to terribly of a tough
    time containing any running game that the Pack has as they are not
    the greatest rushing team around. My point is that if they can stop
    K.C.'s Okoye, Chicago's Anderson, S.D.'s Butts (no punn intended), Denver's
    Humphrey, Seattle's Fenner, and Buffalo's Thomas, which are among
    the best in the league, then G.B.'s running attack should be pretty
    much kept in check. The key as I see it will be for the Raiders
    to keep the pressure on Majik. Schroeder and the receiving corps should
    have a good day against G.B. as well as Bo, Marcus, and Smith.
    
    Carlos 
          
44.8366214::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Nov 06 1990 18:582
    
    Fullwood is on the Browns now.
44.83717135::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Wed Nov 07 1990 12:433
    No wonder they're doing so good. :-)
    
    Carlos
44.83817135::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Wed Nov 07 1990 12:474
    But seriuosly folks, Who's carrying the ball for the Pack ? Woodside?
    Fontenot? or maybe the rookies Thompson or Jackson maybe?????
    
    Carlos
44.839ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Mon Nov 12 1990 14:2712
    Well...the Raiders got stomped by the Packers...and it was ugly.
    The offense was terrible, the defense was OK. The Raiders got their
    'bye' on the eighth week and decided to take an extra two weeks
    off. Somebody switched this years model of Schroeder for last years.
    He has stats that would make Elway proud.....Cmp-Att-Int 11-23-3 139-yds.
    The running game wasn't around. Howie Long did good against Mandarich.
    I hope the Raiders can snap back to pre-bye form in time for the
    Sardines next Monday. Oh well ....at least the Donks and the Chiefs
    lost. Raiders are still #1 in the west! 
    
    
    Carlos
44.840Howie is tough.BSS::MENDEZMon Nov 12 1990 18:554
    I thought that Townsend was lined up against Mandarich.  I did
    see however that Lond had his way with some lineman named Keith
    Euker.  I saw one play where Howie just took one hand and flattened
    Euker.
44.841Keep your heads low, mine is....COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Nov 13 1990 15:035
      The faiders are starting to do just that;^  The second half of the
    season slide that I predicted.  I was off by 1-2 losses, but after the
    fish beat 'em next Monday, then KC and LA will be tied for #1 in west.
    
    	Tim
44.842BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSTue Nov 13 1990 15:1010
	> but after the fish beat 'em next Monday, then KC and LA 
    	> will be tied for #1 in west.
    	>
    	> Tim
    
    Tim, won't KC lose to SD?  That would mean....
    						  Raid 6-4
    						  SD   6-5
    						  KC   5-5
    						   etc...
44.843A little salt for your wounds?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Tue Nov 13 1990 16:4417
    Two things are for certain, next week the Raiders will still be
    on top of the division (maybe in a tie??????, but doubtful) and
    the Donks will still be dead last after getting thrashed by the
    Bears. :-)
    
    Raiders       #1 
    
    KC       
    SD          }  ?
    Seattle         
    
    
    Denver         dead last...
    
    
    Carlos
    
44.844CSC32::SALZERWed Nov 14 1990 01:346
    I thought the return of Bo was all they needed to fire up
    the presses for Bowl tickets. What gives?  
    
    BoB
    Who_still_sees_Denver_at_Denver_on_Raider_schedule.
    
44.845Maybe Bo's gotta go ??ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Wed Nov 14 1990 11:597
    I've been kinda wondering about Bo too. Maybe he's not such a great
    deal after all. The Raiders are something like 13-16 when Bo starts.
    I didn't see the SD game but, against KC and GB he wasn't very
    impressive. Matter of fact I think the Raiders running game was
    doing alot better with Allen and Bell. IMO.
    
    Carlos
44.846Gone fishin !ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Thu Nov 15 1990 20:0619
    
    0\             /0                           
      \  _______  /
       \|   |   |/   
        | ----- |
        || * ^ ||
        ||  `  ||
        ||  =  ||                        /
       /  -----  \                      / |
      /     |     \                    /  |
            |                         /   |
     ---------------                 /    ^
    |               |               /    ( )
   / / \         /\  \             /     /_\
  / /   \       /  \  \           /
        |       |   \  \______ /__
                     \________|___|
    
    
44.847SUPVAX::KERMIThalp, i'f falin an aye kant geddupThu Nov 15 1990 22:524
    re.846
    
    Tha onlee fiche tha raderz wil cach is pokket troudt.
    
44.848BIG GAME!DECXPS::KHARRISFri Nov 16 1990 10:428
    This is the biggest game of the year so far the Raiders. The loss to GB
    should not have happened. It's time that the running game gets going.
    This should be a close game right down to the wire. I think that the
    Raiders will win, 24-21. With Clayton out Miami doesn't have the
    receiving threats it usually has, and hopefully Tony Paige is banged
    up. The team must run for Schroeder to be effective. LETS GO RAIDERS!!!
    
                                      Kenn
44.849Fish have #1 D!!!!COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanFri Nov 16 1990 14:406
      The difference will be at QB, and we all know who is better....
    
    
       I'm trying to cut out the salt please;^
    
    		Tim
44.850I doubt it.....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Fri Nov 16 1990 15:1014
       Speaking of salt, the Sardines #1 'D' can be taken with a grain of
    salt, considering they've played the Patriots twice, the Jets twice,
    Phoenix, Indy, and Pittsburgh (before the offense woke up). They've
    really only played two tough teams, one of them they blew away and
    the other they got blown away. However, in their defense, I guess
    it should be noted that the Jets have a decent offense, and the
    Cards have a good running game. The Dolphins are calling their 'D'
    the 'Make Believe Defense' because after you play them they make
    you believe. While this name is very cute and whimsical, I'm afraid
    I'll have to be like the apostle Thomas, and wait 'til I see it
    before I believe.
    
    Carlos   
    
44.851And the plot thickens.....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Mon Nov 19 1990 18:087
    	With a loss tonight the Raiders would find themselves in a tie
    for first with KC, but a win will give them a one game lead and
    a good chance of extending it to two after next week. The Dolphins
    also need a win tonight to keep up with the Bills. Looking forward
    to a good game!
    
    Carlos
44.852Raiders Win a Big One...Need Next week to CruiseKIDVAX::MBROOKSTue Nov 20 1990 12:135
    Was a great game, all the Raiders have to do now is beat KC this week
    and they all but own the Division Title.....I hope that Houston can
    beat Buffalo this week and that will put the raiders Closer to taken
    the 2nd division title and they wont have to play an extra game 
    against a wild card team....
44.853COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Nov 20 1990 18:027
      In the place of Monty,  The refs gave it to 'em with the ball
    spotting and non-call for a late hit and anything else that I forgot;^
    
       It was a good game though.  The Faider D-line came through with
    pressure.
    
    		Tim
44.854DECXPS::KHARRISTue Nov 20 1990 18:1112
    It was nice to finally be able to watch a game on TV. I live in New
    Hampshire and the only time we see the Raiders is when they're on
    Sunday or Monday night. The game was entertaining to watch, However,
    I don't understand why Miami didn't run the no huddle offense all game.
    The only time they really moved the ball was when Marino was in the
    shotgun and they had a 4 wide receiver set. Townsend, Davis, and
    Washington played extremely well on "D". While the "O"Line, Bo, and
    Marcus did an outstanding job. I only wish that we would be able to get
    next weeks game also.
    
                                     Kenn
    
44.855STARVU::MACGREGORThree time GutterBall champion!!Tue Nov 20 1990 18:3317
    Only got to see the first half, but what a half.  The Raiders moved
    the ball with relative ease until the 10 yard line, then it was
    very difficult.  They were inside the 20 3 times in the first half
    and came away with only 10 points.  Credit the Miami line for coming
    through when it counted.
    
    2 minutes and change left in the first half and it is Raiders 140
    or so yard to Miamis' 3 yards.  Then comes Marino and his deadly
    2 minute drill to pull them within 3 at 10-7.
    
    Really enjoyed seeing Allen, Jackson, and Smith rack up the yards
    against the "#1 defense" HAHAHA who has Miami played so far.  Shroeder
    (spelling?) did well in the first half, going something like 5 for
    7 with one of the two missed balls a drop by Gault.  Good game.
    First Raider game I've been able to see this year.
    
    The Wizard
44.856The way Hoot and Monty see the gameOURGNG::RIGGENBurley from bikingTue Nov 20 1990 19:516
The game was a farce. The Raiders employed the Shell "death grip" all night. 
They got caught a couple of times. I couldn't beleive that Miami call in 
the 3rd quarter for tripping Howie Long that clumsy ox fell down after grabbing the
the OT's Jersey. 

Jeff (parrot)
44.857Raider Beat Miami no ?'s askedKIDVAX::MBROOKSWed Nov 21 1990 12:128
    The Raiders just Outright Outplayed the Dolphins, the 1st half score
    should have been 17-0, the Skins are lucky that they wernt embaressad
    
    The Raiders proved there a team to deal with, looking forward to see
    were they land in the playoffs.  3rd place division is only as good
    as 1st Wildcard spot....Will be intresting to see who takes 2nd place
    division championship !!!
    								Mike
44.858"BIG GAME"DECXPS::KHARRISFri Nov 23 1990 09:3911
    Another big game for the Raiders. They must get the running game going
    early as they did against Miami. They shut down KC's Offense in KC,
    hopefully they can do it again. Gault, Fernandez and Brown must hold on
    to the ball. If they can win this one it will put them up 2 games in
    the division. I like the Raiders by 3.
    
    Raiders 13
    
    Chiefs 10
    
                        Kenn
44.859Raiders Dropp an Important Close oneVLNVAX::MBROOKSMon Nov 26 1990 10:306
    Raiders lost by 3 in one of the most important games to date, not
    only is KC now tied with the Raiders but they are 2-0 in head to
    head, which puts them very strongly in control.  Next Week KC gets
    to play New England (1-10) and LA plays Denver (3-8).  LA needs 
    this win badly just to stay even.....Will have to look ahead at
    both there schedules, I hope LA has some easy games ahead of them.
44.860ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Mon Nov 26 1990 13:3919
    That was one of those heart breaker games that you hate to see them
    lose if your a fan. It was a good game though, and I take my hat
    off to K.C. fans. I think that the key for the Chiefs was the turnovers
    including a blocked field goal early in the game that would have kept
    the score even, and three fumbles on key drives. Schroeder has not
    been very impressive this second half of the season.....I wonder how 
    bad his injury is? Also if Jay is out for a while and Evans gets hurt 
    who replaces him ? Here's a look at the Raiders and Chiefs schedule
    for the remainder of the season:
    
                    L.A.                           K.C.
        ----------------------------   ---------------------------
         at Denver           3-8          at New England    1-10
         at Detroit (Mon.)   4-7             Denver         3-8       
            Cincinnati       6-5             Houston        5-5
         at Minnesota (Sat.) 5-6          at San Diego      5-7
            San Diego        5-7          at Chicago (Sat.) 9-2
                                                            
    Carlos
44.861Raiders RuleELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Tue Nov 27 1990 15:0812
    Looks like Schroeder sprained a ligament in his left knee, and might
    not be playing this weekend against the Broncs. Evans is very athletic,
    but he's not that great of a QB, he likes to run alot, and has thrown
    quite a bit of inty's throughout his career. So it looks like Elway
    will have some competition......:-)
    These inter-divisional rivalry's are usually pretty close, and I'm
    sure the Broncs would just love playing spoiler, but don't count
    on it.
    Raiders by +7.
    
    King Carlos, 
    (Official K.o.t.H.)
44.862Wax that Woodie Art babyOURGNG::RIGGENBurley from bikingTue Nov 27 1990 15:3811
I expect Uncle Al and his cronie Art (Turtle wax) Shell to activate 
Steve Burlein. The team has no faith in Evans and will come into Mile-Hi 
and humbled in the first half by the Donkeys...


The Second Half I expect the Raiders to come alive and squeak by. Only cause 
Denver only plays half a game. 

Jeff 


44.863Don't choke the chodeCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanWed Nov 28 1990 17:179
      It also looks  like the faiders have an easier schedule than KC does,
    going by records.  KC should win the division IMO.
    
      Look for donks to give faiders more than they can handle this
    weekend.  LA will go to Buerlin if things go bad for Evans.  If Denvers
    lines control the game, then the donks will win it.  They are starving
    for a W now a days.
    
    		Tim
44.864BIG LICKS THIS WEEKEND!!CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYWed Nov 28 1990 18:078
    
    Look for the Broncos to beat the Faiders and look for the Faiders to 
    lose 3 of the last five games of this season.
    
    
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
44.865BSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsWed Nov 28 1990 18:1823
>      It also looks  like the faiders have an easier schedule than KC does,
>    going by records.  KC should win the division IMO.
    
    If you go by records, LA's opponents are currently 23-33 and KC's
    opponents are currently 23-32.  KC's next game is at NE, which should
    be a win, then they have 2 at home with Denver and Houston.  I expect
    the Chiefs to win their next 3, then the last 2 are on the road, so 4
    wins in their last 5 games isn't out of the question.  If that happens,
    the Faids need to win all their remaining games to take the division,
    which won't happen.  Looking at the Faids' schedule, I don't think
    they'll win more than 2 of their remaining games anyway.
        
>      Look for donks to give faiders more than they can handle this
>    weekend.  LA will go to Buerlin if things go bad for Evans.  If Denvers
>    lines control the game, then the donks will win it.  They are starving
>    for a W now a days.
   
    Denver will win this weekend.  Just because the Broncos
    only have 3 wins doesn't mean the Faiders will come in and get the easy
    W.  
 
    Joe
        
44.866IMNSHFSW opinionWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MSILVER AND BLACK ARE BACKThu Nov 29 1990 11:063
     ,   The Raiders will dominate both sides of the lines of scrimmage and
    will kill the mules. Raiders win 4 outta 5 and finish 11-5. 2 games
    ahead of the squaws.
44.867ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Nov 29 1990 12:0320
    Geez, I didn't realize there were still so many Donk fans around,
    I was sure that by now they'd all jumped off the bandwagon...:-)
    
    The Raiders are gonna kill the Donks this weekend, look for Elway
    to fake an injury around the third quarter and bow out of the game.
    
    Also look for Marcus and Bo to have a good day.

    It's hard enough for the Donks to beat the Raiders when they're
    on top of the world much less now that they sip miserably.
    
    Read in the paper this week that Mecklenburg (sp?) said the team
    was expecting a tough game against the Raiders, and that there is
    no surprise to the Raiders game plan," they just try to out physical
    you."  Well you got that right Karl, the Raiders are gonna run right
    over you! Bet you can feel them knees gettin weaker by the moment...
    
    His majesty,
    Carlos
    
44.868Give 'em, take 'em, whateverHOTSHT::SCHNEIDER$80,000 + a Chevy BlazerThu Nov 29 1990 16:025
    What's the spread on this game?  I think the Broncos will win it
    easily, both because of the history of this rivalry and that Schroeder
    and the rest of the Raiders have been coming down to earth.
    
    Dan
44.869Go Donks!CSC32::SALZERThu Nov 29 1990 16:0612
    Last week's KC game was the biggest game the Raids have played in
    many many years and what do they do?  Howie Long looked rediculous.
    Al looked like he just got licked in the face by a cow.  Art looked
    like he was going to go back to the drawing board. Marcus looked
    good and Bo didn't look like anything. The Raiders are a team 
    in trouble.  Look for Denver to salvage a season on sunday probably
    by 3 points or less. A Raider loss here will have them seriously 
    questioning their playoff hopes all together. 
    
    BoB 
    
    
44.870looking for the underHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughThu Nov 29 1990 16:115
re: spread.

Raiders still favored, Dan, by 2 but this is dropping.

TTom
44.871DECWET::METZGERIt is happening again...Thu Nov 29 1990 17:1715
What the heck was with the raiders defensive line last week? I was listening
to the game on the radio and on the final drive Either Howie or another Raider
went offsides on every first down of the drive giving the Chiefs 1st and 5
on every series of downs....

The announcers were having a blast with it....

1st and 10 on the 40....Deberg steps up...and HOWIE jumps offside for the 
5th time this game!!!!

Was somebody snapping him on the butt with a rubber band or what?


Metz
44.872GO BRONCOS!!!!CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYThu Nov 29 1990 17:4710
    
    
    Faiders will have there hands full come sunday.
    close game But look for the Broncos to put the Mr.maggo tag
    on Bro.AL head..
    
    
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
44.873Re. .871ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Nov 29 1990 18:0010
    Howie was being drawn off sides by DeBergs snap count, where DeBerg
    goes something like : "hut hut HUT! hut" and gives a nod of his
    head on the audible with the emphasis. DeBerg is a master of drawing 
    defenders off sides with this tactic. Howie, on the other hand has
    always had a very quick start off the snap, so he was one of the
    ones that was continually being drawn off, along with Golic.
    
    
    His Kinglyness,
    Carlos
44.874I'm not accusing them of being rocket scientists....DECWET::METZGERIt is happening again...Thu Nov 29 1990 19:2415
Weel then Howie must have the brain the size of a pea to not figure it out by 
the 2nd or 3rd time but 5 or 6 offsides????

C'mon....Are futbal pleyures tat stoopid ?


Metz


btw- I was watching some college game this weekend and the best they could do 
for student athlete of the game was some senior with a 2.2 in business....I 
guess college big time student athletes are really a thing of the past...

At least they should be able to dig up some guy with a 3.0 or better....
44.875Still a Raider at heart...ELMAGO::CGRIEGOOfficial King of the Hill '90Fri Nov 30 1990 12:058
    It seems that after the S.F.- Tampa game Nov. 18th ex-Raider linebacker
    Matt Millen, was approached by an unidentified Tampa OL rookie, "Mr 
    Millen, Mr Millen," the rookie said "it was great to play against you 
    today. I can tell my kids someday that I blocked you." 
    "You didn't block me, kid," growled  Millen.
    
    His kinglyness,
    Carlos
44.876So you sayCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanFri Nov 30 1990 14:1711
      Hey Carlos,  You talk about bandwagon donk fans,  but what about you? 
    I don't recall seeing you in this file last year when the faiders
    sucked;^
    
      I was in here last year after finding this file, and I'm here now
    during the Broncos worst season in ? years....
    
    
       Donks by 4..
    
    		Tim
44.877ELMAGO::CGRIEGOOfficial King of the Hill '90Fri Nov 30 1990 16:3816
    Tim, I ain't no BW jumper either. Been a Raider fan since I became
    interested in football back when I was 12 yrs old, which was 1976,
    they coincidentally won the SuperBowl that year, which had nothing
    to do with me. I started at DEC about three years ago, and didn't
    find out about Notes 'til last year sometime, I was pretty much
    read only in the archived NFL Notes file and started replying in
    the American_football file around the time that it started up. Did'nt
    find out about the Sports file 'til around the end of last season
    (see .26). By the way, the Raiders were 8-8 last year, and IMHO
    that does not suck, however, 3-8 does. Another interesting thing
    that you might be happy to know about, is that, during the '80's
    the Donks won a grand total of four more games than the Raiders,
    and perhaps even more importantly, the Raiders were 2-0 in SuperBowl
    performances compared to the powerful Donks 0-3 (?) performances.
                                                                     
    Carlos
44.878COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanFri Nov 30 1990 20:566
      Ok!!!  Put me in my place;^^^
    
      Are you sure on that win stat?   Seems the faiders last 5 years were
    either 8-8 or worse.
    
    		Tj
44.879CSC32::SALZERSat Dec 01 1990 00:218
    Don't break the guys bubble. Raider fans can always tell you
    how great their team is. It just that the rest of the NFL 
    just never has and may never really appreciate the greatness
    that they would have you believe. Denver may be bad this season
    but don't think the Raiders are anything more than a cut above
    mediocre. Maybe. 
    
    BoB 
44.880Furth...hiccup...further support.....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Sat Dec 01 1990 11:4934
    >Seems the faiders last 5 years were either 8-8 or worse.
    
    Close Tim, your statement would be true if you woulda said the last
    4 years, and the two sub .500 yrs within that span, interestingly
    enough, were directly attributable to a product from Denver, namely,
    Shanahan. Here's a break down of Raiders -vs- Donks in the '80's:
                                  
            Raiders           Broncos
            -------           -------
      
    Yr.     Record            Record
    -------------------------------------
    '89     8-8               11-5
    '88     7-9               8-8
    '87     5-10              10-4-1
    '86     8-8               11-5
    '85     12-4              11-5
    '84     11-5              13-3
    '83     12-4              9-7
    '82     8-1               2-7
    '81     7-9               10-6
    '80     11-5              8-8
    ---------------------------------
    Ttl.    89-63             93-58-1
                                     
    The only team in the AFC that was better than these two was, Miami,
    there record for the '80's is 94-57-1. The best in the league was
    S.F., and there record was an amazing 105-46-1.
    
    His Kinglyness,
    Carlos

    P.S. Often statistics are used as a drunken man uses lampposts
          - for support rather than illumination.
44.881No doubt about it, the Donks are the best 3-9 team aroundELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Mon Dec 03 1990 12:0920
    Hats off to you Donk fans, that was another typical, down to the
    last play, type of game between these two teams. Raiders held on
    to win it 23-20. With this win the Raiders sweep the Donks,...and
    have won the last 5 out of 6,.....and lead the series 41-18-2 !
    No wonder you Donk fans hate the Raiders. Bo Jackson was great,
    breaking loose for 2 TD's, an 11, and a 62 yarder, rushing 13 times
    for 117 yds. Schroeder silenced his critics, completing 16 out of
    23 for 145 yds., although I think he could have had an even better
    day against a poor passing defense. The Raiders needed this win to
    keep pace with the Chiefs atop the West at 8-4. For the remainder
    of the season, and because of this win, I think the Raiders now
    have the upper hand on the Chiefs, especially if the Donks play
    spoiler next week. 
    
    Go Raiders!!!!
    
    Go Donks!!!!  (ouch....that hurt)
    
    His Royal-ty-ness,
    Carlos
44.882THERE GOES THE SEASON!!!CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYThu Dec 06 1990 17:5515
    
    I must say it was a good a game too bad the Broncos didn't win. I 
    think where they lost the game was the interception by Elway that 
    hurt. But they still showed that do have the talent to win it's 
    just that they can't seem to get any pressure on the QB. I think
    that's whats so frustrating about there games along with the hand 
    slapping so called tackles. The Draft Looks good to me.
    
    
     GO BRONCOS.......GET DEFENSIVE LINEMEN/LINEBACKERS IN THE DRAFT...
    
     
     " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
44.883Un-biased forecast!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Fri Dec 07 1990 15:1112
    How I see the remainder of the season:
    
    Raiders @Detroit (Mon)             Raiders are gonna win by more
                                       than 10. Raiders-27 Lions-16.
    
    Cinci   @Raiders                   Raiders by 7. 21-14.
    
    Raiders @Minn.   (Sat)             Brrrr... Flip a coin..
    
    SD      @Raiders                   Raiders by 4. 20-16.
    
    Carlos
44.884Could Be Trouble!!!!!DECXPS::KHARRISFri Dec 07 1990 15:199
    The Raiders could have problems with Detroit if the Lions use Sanders
    the way that Houston used Lorenzo White against Buffalo. Over the last
    couple of years the Raiders have been very vulnerable to the draw play
    out of a passing formation. I can't see them faring any better against
    Sanders if they don't prepare for him.
    
    
    
                                        Kenn
44.885CSC32::J_HERNANDEZGreenpiece,WhatALeprechaunGetsFri Dec 07 1990 16:101
    Sanders will score at least 2 tds.
44.886ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Fri Dec 07 1990 16:396
    Well if he does score at least 2 tds, I believe that will be twice
    as many tds as the Raiders have allowed all season against the rush.
    ( I'm assuming you meant he would score them rushing instead of
    receiving.)
    
    Carlos
44.887CSC32::SALZERFri Dec 07 1990 16:4217
    I went to the game sunday. It was great watching the hitting and 
    shoving and fighting.  The Raiders were soundly boo'd on entrance
    or exit. Many cops were standing down by their ramp area along with
    a collection of Raider fans. I agree with Drewski. Elway's interception
    which was the only trunover by both teams was the key. Carlos said 
    Shroeder looked good. I would have looked good too standing in the 
    backfield all day patiently waiting. Half of Shroeders pass yards 
    came on a 1/2 doz little out patterns to Gault. Henderson got 
    burned on those all day. But to Jay's credit he read Henderson's
    inability to effectively cover and took advantage time and time again.   
    Denver lead in all stats except for the 1 turnover and of course the
    one that counts, final score. This was just another of the many this 
    season that just seeemed to slip away.  It's kind of a twisted 
    world at times but I have this feeling Raider fans are pulling 
    for Denver this weekend. 
    
    BoB
44.888TOUGH GAMES....CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYFri Dec 07 1990 17:4810
    
    re-1 
    
     I think all of the Faider fans are pulling for Denver this week and
     I think they could get there wish but I also think them Lions will
     eat them up on monday night.
    
    
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
44.889go donksCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanFri Dec 07 1990 18:064
      I don't know that Denver will fair well in KC.  They always have
    problems.
    
    		Tim
44.890GO BRONCOSCSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYFri Dec 07 1990 19:4212
    
    
    re-1 
    
    Good point Tim, They do seem to have problems in KC so maybe I'm wrong	
    and KC will win, Boy won't that be a shocker and that poor old guy 
    will be stuck up there in Denver on the Board.
    
    
    "THE DREWSKI "
    
     
44.891RAIDERS FAITHFULS ARE ALIVE!!!\WLDWST::LSUSTAITASun Dec 09 1990 05:3919
    WE'LL the RAIDERS have a good chance to go 3-1 in their last four
    games minnesota has been winning and as for the bengals the 
    RAIDERS have had their # for a while i hope the RAIDERS can pull it 
    off this season its been an up and down battle against them selves
    basicly JAY SCHRAEDER THE RAIDERS will be in the playoffs...
    
    
    
                                    always keeping are hopes up
    
                                   SILVER&BLACK ATTACK ARE BACK!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    
                  LA RAIDERS  28
                  DETRIOT     10
                                          JUST WIN BABY!!!!
    
44.892Will LA win by more than 3, im not convinvcedVLNVAX::MBROOKSMon Dec 10 1990 10:439
    Well No help from Denver yesturday, they beat denver and even covered
    the 8pt spread....Its up to LA now, they should have no problems
    beating Detroit (should have no problem) but will they be able to
    cover the 3pt spread.  After last weeks 3pt win over denver they scare
    me on these close games.  Im hoping for a LA blowout....Have to wait
    and see.....Wildcard rece is getting scary LA needs this win to give
    them a lock on the playoffs and keep them in position for the Division.
    
    								Mike
44.893Lions might pose problem if QB is protected.COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanMon Dec 10 1990 20:0313
    re-1  As well you should not be convinced.  LA is in the 2nd half
    season slide that I predicted, and I see it continuing (sp?).  I think
    the raiders will win 1-2 games.  The should definitely lose to Minni,
    and I think cinci stands a real good chance of beating them with the no
    huddle offense.
    
      LA always seems to sub alot of people on defense, and I think cincy
    will take advantage of it (I hope).
    
    	No I'm not jumpin' any wagons,  I just like to se the Faiders lose.
    
    
    		Tim
44.894No huddle being employed less and less ...CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RTue Dec 11 1990 11:239
>      LA always seems to sub alot of people on defense, and I think cincy
>    will take advantage of it (I hope).
    
     Was listening to a Cris Collinsworth (he does a sports talk show on a
     Cincinnati radio station) last night and he said Boomer had a groin
     pull from Sunday's game and could barely move on Monday.  He is not
     expected to be 100% ready to go against the Raiders.  Moreover, the
     Bengals have really tried to become a running team since about week 5
     of the season, and are averaging around 25-28 passes per game since then.
44.895COMET::DUNKERSTue Dec 11 1990 11:379
    With the faiders coming to the Metrodome, they will definitely lose
    to Minnesota. Schroeder will be eating heavy amounts of turf when
    the Purple People Eaters get ahold of him. 
    
    Easy win for the Vikes!
    Minn-28
    L.A.-09
    
    Purple Blooded
44.896LA Beats Detroit bring on Cinncy....KIDVAX::MBROOKSTue Dec 11 1990 11:5212
    Im praying big that LA can romp over Cinncy next week, they did a good
    job against Detroit last night, even after detroit rolled up the pts in
    the 1st qtr.  If LA can beat cinncy this week it not only puts them in
    the playoffs but that combines with the buffalo loss on saturday to the
    giants will put them 1 game behind buffalo for home field....If buffalo
    loses this week then has to play miami the following week they could
    lose the remainder of the season....  If the raiders and buffalo both
    finished with the same record who gets home field (have they played
    head to head this year)  This also putts Houston and Pittsburg in
    control in the central, houston will have a tough game against KC but
    pitt should be able to take NO.....Great weekend for playoff effects..
    
44.897STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Dec 11 1990 11:578
    re .896:
    
    Buffalo beat the Raiders earlier this year, so they'd get the edge in a
    tie-breaker.  Note however that the Bills last three games are against 
    the Giants, Dolphins, and Redskins.
    
    
    py
44.898Carlos is quiet????COMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanTue Dec 11 1990 14:4711
      I think your forgetting  KC.  Remember that KC beat the Faiders 2x
    this year, so thus if a tie breaker is needed, then LA loses.  I tried
    to watch last nights game, but was "preoccupied".  I did see the Lions
    get 2-3 Td's early, then LA getting 2, but missed everything after
    that, with the exception of that 10 minute review of the
    fumble,run,penalty, and????...
    
      Who is Boomers back up?  I don't recall ever seeing anyone play QB
    for Cinncy, except for Boom.
    
    		Tim
44.899last I remeber it was Turk Shornert (sp)MPP6::CHILDSGot 2 shots, anywhere &amp; anytimeTue Dec 11 1990 14:520
44.900ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Tue Dec 11 1990 15:0114
    >Carlos is quiet???
    
    I was saving myself for marri...ehh...I mean .900. 
    
    Great game last night, unbelievable first quarter.
    
    Barry Sanders is for real!
    
    Raiders are gonna win the West, count on it!
    
    I believe Norman's (a.k.a. Boomer's) backup is Southpaw Erik Wilhelm.
    
    His noble-ty-ness,
    Carlos
44.901DECWET::METZGERIt is happening again...Tue Dec 11 1990 15:5822
Yup Erik Wilhelm...a total Boomer clone right down to being a southpaw and blond.
Of course he doesn't rake in the advertisement $$$$ that Boomer does....


Those of you extolling the fact that the lions have a decent defense....


They are currently ranked last in the league....

The R&S put up enough points last night, The Lion defense let them down....Of
course the officials bogus call on the fumble that was kept in bounds had a 
little something to do with it.

They spend 8 minutes replaying where to spot a fumble recovery (a few yards 
either way) and then they don't bother to look at the conclusive replay on 
a fumble recovery....

Ugh,


  Metz
44.902Lion out of bounds on the fumble was too close to callKIDVAX::MBROOKSWed Dec 12 1990 10:5717
    	Didnt the Ref on the field call the man out of bounds, the reply I
    saw, which I believe was the closes view to where the call actually 
    came from it looked like the player was touching (His hand towel was
    clearly on the ground)  So the reg saw a part of his body touching the
    ground, remember the ref is watching this at full speed....The reply
    has to have conclusive evidence to overturn a call and he did not...No
    view showed without a doubt that he was not out of bounds.....I think
    the only thing that was touching out of bounds was his hand towel ????
    maybe theyll stop wearing them on the side....OH well good game anyway,
    even if detroit got that call I think the raiders would have won....
    There a much better team then detroit and if it wasnt for the explosive
    1st qtr that detroit had the game would have been a cake walk for the
    raiders....The best team won, hopefully KC will drop one next week and
    LA will win and keep this race interesting...LA loses in a tie and its
    getting down to the wire.
    
    								Mike
44.903REFINE::ASHEWaiting... 4 u 2 justify my video...Wed Dec 12 1990 12:455
    No way.   ABC even said had the booth seen the same view they had they
    would have reversed it, but didn't because of the 8 minute fiasco
    before that on 4th down.  The towel touches after he makes contact with
    the ball.  It was a blown call, showing the inconsistancy of the
    instant replay booth...z
44.904Good Game Good Call, Best call ref could have madeKIDVAX::MBROOKSWed Dec 12 1990 13:3018
    Yes when he first made contact with the fumble his towel was not
    touching the ground, I have the game on tape and stoped and slow
    mode the play several times and before the ball left his hand his
    towel was most definatley touching the ground, I dont beleive that
    this is part of his body and counts as being out of bounds, maybe
    it does Im not sure.  But the towel was most definatly touching the
    gound before the ball  left his hand, this is what the ref saw and
    called.....I guess my question now is does the towel count as part
    of him if so he was out of bounds, if the towel does not count then
    the ball left his hands .0000001 seconds before he touched ground.
    
    It was a good call from the angle it came from and I doubt very much
    it could have been overturned......(maybe by a anti Raider or a blind
    detroit fan, or even a KC fan but no one else)......Ill proberbly go
    home now and watch it a few more times to make sure, if you have it
    taped you may want to slow-mo throw that play and see when the towel
    hits the ground and when the ball LEAVES his hand !!!
    								Mike
44.905SASE::SZABOThe Beer HunterWed Dec 12 1990 13:488
    I thought the "argument" on that call was concerning the direction the
    ball went after it was slapped away from the sideline, no?  Didn't the
    3 Stooges in the booth say that the ball would've had to be slapped in
    the backward direction, not forward?
    
    Of course, this was after several ales anyway.....  :-)
    
    Hawk
44.906REFINE::ASHEWaiting... 4 u 2 justify my video...Wed Dec 12 1990 14:513
    Right, but it *was* slapped backwards.  (not the 4th down play Hawk,
    this was a Raider fumble)... towards the end zone the Lions were
    defending...
44.907Told ya it was the ales!SASE::SZABOThe Beer HunterWed Dec 12 1990 15:426
    In the immortal words of Emily Latella:
    
    		"Oh.  Nevermind!"
    
    Hawk
    
44.908REFINE::ASHEWaiting... 4 u 2 justify my video...Wed Dec 12 1990 15:559
    The official NFL stance was that the play was whistled dead and
    shouldn't have been reviewed.  According to the NFL replay official
    in Detroit, "I had 3 views on TV, it was inconclusive... after the play
    went on, TV came back with another shot (where was he?)  If I had had
    that shot I would have overruled that play on the field..."
    
    Take it up with the official Mike...
    
    -Walt
44.909Why instant replay is a farceHOTSHT::SCHNEIDER$80,000 + a Chevy BlazerWed Dec 12 1990 15:5522
    I've seen this out of bounds play 3 times in the past 5 weekends or so. 
    
    FIrst was the Jets-Dolphins game, Dolphins fumbled, Jets recover, but
    the refs say it went out of bounds.  TV replay clearly shows it never
    went out, and after about 5 minutes, the refs are ready to give the
    ball to the Jets.  They see Shula fuming on the sideline, take two more
    minutes then re-reverse the call claiming the old inadvertant whistle.
    
    About a week later, the Giants recovered such a fumble, but the replay
    seemed to show that the recovering Giant, Pepper Johnson I think, was
    half laying out of bounds as he reeled it in.  Not much discussion and
    the ball was given to the Giants.
    
    Then this past Monday, the ball should have been ruled a fumble, but
    the Raiders hang on to the ball despite a conclusive replay.
    
    3 times this play occured, never once called right, but the Dolphins.
    Giants and Raiders all benefit.
    
    It's who you know.
    
    Dan
44.910DECWET::METZGERIt is happening again...Wed Dec 12 1990 16:2024
Not to mention that the inadvertant whistle is a big cop out. The technology
exists today to have a visual mark appear on the video tape the exact moment 
a whistle is blown on the field. Why won't the NFL use it. They say cost...

The entire system would cost 500k...BFD to a league that is raking in money hand
over fist. I say it is because they are too wimpy to institute the instant
replay the way it should be.

1) NO ex-nfl official in the replay booth. Use somebody specifically trained for
    this job who doesn't worry about making his buddies on the field look bad.

2) Use the visual whistle on the tape...

3) Give each coach 3 appeals per game. Let the coaches decide when they want to
    use the replay. If they want more than 3 make them forfeit timeouts for them.
   IE. make it an appeal play, If the coach wins he keeps his 3 appeal, if he
   loses then he is down to 2 appeals left.



My $.02,

  Metz
44.911MPP6::MACNEALLife's 2 short 2 drink cheap beerWed Dec 12 1990 16:384
44.912JMHOELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Wed Dec 12 1990 16:505
    I think every team has both benefited and been hurt by the instant
    replay, so in the grand scheme of things, it all balances out.
    
    His king-ly-ness
    Carlos
44.913And it aggravates the hell out of the fans, too...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 12 1990 17:0535
    
> Not to mention that the inadvertant whistle is a big cop out. The technology
> exists today to have a visual mark appear on the video tape the exact moment 
> a whistle is blown on the field. Why won't the NFL use it. They say cost...
    
    The problem is that the play is *really* dead when in the official's 
    mind he says it is.  The whistle may come later.  Linking the whistle 
    to the video is more electronic gimmickry which would take even more 
    on-field judgement from the official and cause even more problems, in 
    my opinion.  For instance, what if the whistle drops from the 
    officials' mouth on a play when forward progress is stopped, he delays 
    getting it back in and there's a subsequent fumble?  The whistle is
    nothing more than the physical realization of what is going on in the
    official's head, and should not be an irrefutable, locked-in substitute
    for that...
    
    In any case, most of these whistles are not "inadvertent" anyway. 
    They're a direct response to what the official thought he saw, even if
    delayed.  The video marker wouldn't fix the problem of the blown fumble
    call.  I say scrap the replay and rely on the official's judgement or 
    pass a rule that says that whenever the ball is loose the play is live, 
    whether the whistle has blown or not.  The whistle would stop any 
    advancement of the loose ball once recovered, but at least it would not 
    affect the more important question of possession.  Does this make sense 
    or is the whistle really so sacred that it can't be pre-empted 
    temporarily?  I don't think I've ever seen a fumble play where the 
    whistle stopped anyone from crashing into that pig-pile, to tell you 
    the truth...
    
    I still don't understand why they even bother to review fumble calls
    after the play has been ruled dead on the field.  It accomplishes
    nothing but letting us know whether the original call was blown or not.
    
    glenn

44.914Merry Xmas....No bashing here.....DECWET::METZGERIt is happening again...Wed Dec 12 1990 18:2635
Let take an example where they showed the whistle marking on the video tape...

A couple of years ago (might have even been last year) Denver playing the
Browns. John-boy throws a pass to his back behind the line of scrimmage, 
The back drops the ball and the cleveland defender falls on the ball and 
then picks it up and goes into the end zone.

The refs say incomplete pass, then they review it and decide it actually was
a lateral. Then they say Denver still gets the ball because the whistle had 
blown the ball dead when it hit the ground.

Then CBS shows the video tape with the visual whistle signal on it (the 
first time I saw it was this year) They show that the whistle wasn't actually
blown until the cleveland player had picked up the ball and was getting up to
start his stroll into the end zone.

The official might have thought the play was over in his head but he didn't
communicate it to the players on the field. The ball was technically still live
when the cleveland player picked it up. It should have been cleveland ball
where it was recovered.

A lot of times the officials use the excuse (the play was blown dead) even 
though you can listen to the replay and hear the whistle well after the point
where the official says the play was dead. IMO the play isn't over until the 
official communicates it to the players (whistle is blown).

In soccer you're always taught to play the whistle, If the ball goes out of 
bounds don't pick it up, keep playing until the official signals the play is 
over or you can get penalized.

I think that the whistle should be the signal that the play is dead not some
abstract idea in an officials mind.

Metz
44.915Go BroncosCOMET::JACKSONTAIMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcanWed Dec 12 1990 18:588
      Jeeze,  I thought that the Donks file was bad for this BS.  I beleive
    one of the 3 ABC boys said that they wouldn't be suprised to see the
    replay go away next year and I wouldn't either.
    
      I agree that it needs "bettered" and that it also has benefitted all
    teams.
    
          	Tim
44.916What's the rule now (John H?)?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 12 1990 21:0128
           
    > I think that the whistle should be the signal that the play is dead 
    > not some abstract idea in an officials mind.

    I hear you, Metz, but I don't think you can make a rule based on
    something as arbitrary as how long it takes the official to blow the
    whistle.  Instead of a black-and-white call of the player being down 
    or not, you've now got fans looking on holding their breath hoping 
    that the ref took his time blowing the damn thing in making his call.
    Get an identical play in the same game that goes the other way because 
    an official whistled quickly, and you've got more complaints than you 
    had before... 
    
    I believe the inevitable result of such a rule would be that the
    officials wouldn't blow the whistle even on obvious downs, then
    would try to backtrack with the use of instant replay.  That
    indecisiveness is an insidious side-effect that instant replay has 
    already produced.
    
    I'm not even sure of the current rule so maybe John H. can help.  Under 
    the rules, can a replay official even overturn a down call on the field
    if he doesn't hear the whistle on the tape or something?  I've never
    seen it done, and yet everyone, especially sportscasters, always 
    assumes that the officials are copping out.  Are they given any choice
    at all in the matter?
    
    glenn
    
44.917FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu Dec 13 1990 10:2613
    The technology exists to mark a spot on the replay tape when the
    whistle was blown, but the NFL Officials have fought it.
    
    To my knowledge, the Replay Official is a former on-field official in
    either the college or NFL ranks.  A Replay Offical works with the same
    officiating crew all year and attends all the night before and pre
    game meetings with the on-field crew.
    
    Finally, a replay official is not allowed to overturn a call if an
    on-field official claims the whistle had blown the play dead.  I don't
    think it will be a reversible call until the proper technology is used.
    
    John
44.918exitVLNVAX::MBROOKSThu Dec 13 1990 12:0613
    Why not use robots to play the game and then there wont be injuries.
    The Instant reply can go but inadvertant wistles will have to stay.
    If I heard the wistle blow and then saw the ball bouncing on the gound
    or some guy running it in for a TD I wouldnt chase him if I heard the
    wistle blow the call dead.........Theres good and bad points to
    every argument to and for Reply but bad news guys were not going to
    decide.   And lastly you can never take the opionins of the guys up in
    the booth there more Bias then the coaches....
    
    Im sure if you review the whole game you could find a call that went
    in Detroit favor and the 2 would equal out.  Every so often I do watch
    a game that seems to be one sided but not that often....
    								Mike
44.919NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Dec 13 1990 12:1412
               
    > Finally, a replay official is not allowed to overturn a call if an
    > on-field official claims the whistle had blown the play dead.  I don't
    > think it will be a reversible call until the proper technology is used.
    
    So then strictly by the rules the possibility *does* exist that an 
    official can make a down call on the field, hold the whistle, and 
    have it overturned by instant replay?  If so, seems like a hole in 
    the rules, but...
    
    glenn
    
44.920CSC32::J_HERNANDEZGreenpiece,WhatALeprechaunGetsThu Dec 13 1990 13:222
    re .918, better yet have the robots automatically stop when the whistle
    is blown.
44.921Raiders/Houston/Pittsburg All Win (Would love it)VLNVAX::MBROOKSThu Dec 13 1990 13:3911
    Maybe we can just use Post Hypnotic Suggestions in all players to stop
    when they here the Whistle.....
    
    Can anyone direct me out of the Instant Reply/Officails note and to 
    the raiders notes file....
    
    Raiders 21 Cinny 20			Houston 27 KC 24 in OT...
    
    This would make a perfect Weekend Pittsburg is the only AFC Central
    with a less then good team	Pittsburg 24 New Orleans 10
    								Mike
44.922Dear Raiders, please help.SHALOT::MEDVIDNovember spawned a monsterThu Dec 13 1990 14:316
    Pittsburgh has been suspect at defensing the run lately and they have
    yet to face a back the size of Heyward.  Walsh is getting better every
    game.  I think it will be close, but I also would not be surprised if
    the AFC central is still a dead heat after this weekend also.
    
    	--dan'l
44.923SONG::ASHEWaiting... 4 u 2 justify my video...Thu Dec 13 1990 18:429
    Maybe you can, but think of what happens if Detroit gets the call.
    
    They have the ball with another minute or so on the clock.
    They have a timeout.
    They have it 30 yards farther down field.
    They have down by 4 instead of 7.
    
    If you can think of a call they got with that much of an impact,
    let me know...
44.924What if...What if..VLNVAX::MBROOKSFri Dec 14 1990 10:5219
    If were going to do what if'sss then on the first play when detroit
    gets the ball they throw an interception and raiders run it back for 
    a td and now there up by 11......
    
    Any Bad call can have a major impact,  It can put you from a run play
    to a force pass play, stop you from getting a 1st down, anytime you
    stop a team from making the 1st down youve taking away there chance to
    score.  I didnt watch the entire game, I taped it and fast forward thru
    alot but Im sure there was at least one questionable call either for
    detroit or against LA that gave det a 1st down or took one away from
    LA.  Anything can happen, look at minnasota there still in the playoff
    hunt after being 1-6 or something like that...
    
    Even if you look at this one situation, Detroit is still forced to
    score a TD being down by 4....and if they did LA would only need a
    Field Goal to tie it...
    
    Bottom line the best team won....
    								Mike
44.925ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Fri Dec 14 1990 14:3814
    re. 921
    
    >Pittsburgh is the only AFC central with a less then good team
    
    Hey Mike, are you forgetting about the Browns? I gotta say that
    I like your win/lose predictions (except for the Saint/Steeler game),
    but don't agree on the scores (except the Oiler/Chief game). I think 
    it'll be more like:
    
    Raiders - 27       Oilers/Chiefs,      Saints   - 24
    Bengals - 14       same as yours       Steelers - 17
                                                        
    
    Carlos
44.926RAIDERS SILVER&BLACK ATTACK!GSMOKE::LSUSTAITAMon Dec 17 1990 04:138
    the RAIDERS are back they beat the CINCINATI KITTENS,
    and they beat them pretty easy.RAIDERS CLINCH A PLAYOFF BIRTH
    since 1985.     
                    LOS ANGELES RAIDERS  24
                    CINNCINATI BENGALS    7 F
    
                                     SILVER&BLACK ARE BACK!!!!!!!
                                          THE ULTIMATE RAIDERS FAN!!!
44.927Cinncy's Defense Knows Diddly about BO !!!VLNVAX::MBROOKSMon Dec 17 1990 10:567
    Raiders still have to win next 2 weeks to guarentee the division and
    a buy in the 1st round of the playoffs....They cant tie KC, kc plays
    SD and the bears, Raiders have Minn next week (hope they crush them
    this would knock Minn out of the playoffs and give dallas a better
    pick this draft.).....BO knows cinncys Defense, BO owns Cinncy's Def.
    
    								Mike
44.928ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Mon Dec 17 1990 12:0810
    >Raiders still have to win next 2 weeks to guarantee the division
    >and a bye in the 1st round of the playoffs...
    
    or, the Raiders win one and the Chiefs lose one. The main thing
    is that the Raiders are in the playoffs!!!! As somebody else pointed
    out, they have'nt been to the playoffs since '85, which was also
    the last time that they one the Super Bowl.(?)
    
    His noble-ty-ness,
    Carlos
44.929CSC32::J_HERNANDEZGreenpiece,WhatALeprechaunGetsMon Dec 17 1990 12:499
    No Carlos, You sovern-knowingless,
    
    
    The Bears won in '85, The Patsies beat the pa-Raiders in the divisional
    playoffs. 
    
    The  Raiders won in 83.
    
    u was schlepped
44.930Bo's gonna know the SuperBowl!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Mon Dec 17 1990 13:5236
    re -1   oops! oh well, good thing I put in the little (?) dis-claimer.
            I do however, know for sure that the last two times an AFC
            team won the SB it was the Raiders. :-)
        
            Here is my personal playoff predictions:
    
     AFC    East
            Miami   13-3
            Buffalo 12-4  (wild card)
    
            Central
            Houston 10-6                     Pitts. will also be 9-7, but
                                             will not make the playoffs
                                             due to tie-breaker decision
                                             going to KC and Seattle.
    
            West
            Raiders 12-4
            Seattle  9-7  (wild card)
            KC       9-7  (wild card)
      
         
     NFC    East
            Giants  13-3
            Wash.   11-5  (wild card)     
            Phil.   10-6  (wild card)
            Dallas   8-8  (wild card)
    
            Central
            Chicago 12-4
    
            West
            San Fran 13-3 
    
    His Kinglyness,
    Carlos
44.931Where Are You Now????CBROWN::KHARRISMon Dec 17 1990 13:579
    One thing that I don't hear any more is all of the people ripping
    Bo anymore. Everyone said it wouldn't work with Marcus and Bo splitting
    time in the Backfield and they're wrong. Bo can break it loose at
    anytime during the game. He's rushed for over 100 yds. the last three
    games and he's looked spectacular doing it. Marcus is very unselfish as
    well as being a top running back.
    
    
    Kenn
44.932Just Win Baby!!!!!ROYALT::FORGETRaiders FanMon Dec 17 1990 17:1513
    
    
      Kenn
    
           I agree with you 100%.  The splitting of Bo & Marcus
    is great.  It helps out each other.  Their a double threat.
    When Bo's resting, Marcus the multi talented back and Bo the
    power runner.  Bo looked awesome.  The defense played another
    good game.  The Raiders should win the Division.  UP Next the
    Purple People Eaters (The Vikings), who lost to Tampa Bay.
    
    
    Mike 
44.933KC will take divisionCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Dec 17 1990 19:255
      From what I have seen of Bo,  he gets 75%-80% of his yards on 1 run. 
    He had a 90 yarder yesterday,  which I thought was very impressive, but
    other than that run(s), what else did he do?   He does break them open.
    
    		Tim
44.934Raiders will win big this week and may clinch itVLNVAX::MBROOKSTue Dec 18 1990 11:2712
    A 70-80 yrd run will put points on the board 99% of the time........
    Id love to see him have one run like this each game, even if he only
    avergaes 2-3 yrds on the rest of his carries it opens up the recievers
    when the defense is bo struck...  I still like marcus allen and wish
    he didnt have to split his time with another top RB, Marcus should be
    getting 1000yrds each year with his talant and if he played on any
    other team he would..Of course by splitting the time it also lesson the
    chances of injury so who knows....The Raiders should beat Minnasota big
    this weekend, which could clinch the division for LA and will knock 
    Minn out of the playoff picture completly.
    
    	Hows this for a Dream Superbowl	La raiders VS Dallas Cowboys..
44.935HA HACOMET::DUNKERSTue Dec 18 1990 11:327
    Re.-1
    Faiders will not win over Minnesota big......not even in their wildest
    dreams. They will be lucky to ecape the Metrodome with a 10 point loss.
    
    Not a chance......
    
    Purple Blooded
44.936BSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsTue Dec 18 1990 11:4512
>    The Raiders should beat Minnasota big
>    this weekend, which could clinch the division for LA and will knock 
>    Minn out of the playoff picture completly.
 
    The only way a Faider win would clinch the division would be if the
    Chiefs choke again this weekend.  The Faiders will come back to earth
    this week anyway, as the Vikes will win easily.   
    
    Minnesota 34
    Russians  10
    
    Joe
44.937Raiders need it more....VLNVAX::MBROOKSTue Dec 18 1990 11:174
    The raiders cant afford a loss and the Vikings have a small pipe dream
    chance of making the playoffs....Besides the vikings have to lose there
    last 2 so Dallas will have better draft picks :-)...
    
44.938Raiders = AFC West Champions!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Tue Dec 18 1990 12:5320
    >.....,as the Vikes will win easily.
    
    Yeah right, like they easily won the powerful Buccaneers. Haaaaha.
    
    Should be a good game though. Both teams have big physical type
    players on defense, but the Raiders IMHO, are better against the
    run than the Vikes, which should be the Raiders avenue on offense.
    Look for Bo to run over Joey Browner at least once. Herschel will 
    be kept in check, even if Burns decides to utilize him a little more 
    than his usual 8 or so carries/per game.  :-)  Tim Brown has awakened
    on offense which should help free up Gault and Fernandez for some
    big gains. That is if Schroeder doesn't Sybil out on us again. :-)
    
    Raiders - 24
    Vikes   - 17
    
    His kinglyness,
    Carlos
    
    
44.939Bo who?COMET::DUNKERSTue Dec 18 1990 13:2311
    RE-1 
    
    I hope the Faiders are as cocky and over-confident as you because the
    Vikes lost to the Buc's, because come Saturday the men in purple are
    gonna wipe the turf up with Schroeder, Bo(tsk), and the rest of those
    clowns. In order for Bo-Bo to get near Browner, he's gotta get past
    the front four...and that won't happen. It'll be an entertaining game
    alright..but if your really lookin' for a win...well, enough said.
    
    
    Vikes..in a laugher!
44.940Herschal VS BO Could be close by add allen and look outVLNVAX::MBROOKSTue Dec 18 1990 15:135
    I think LA will mix it up a little more this week.  BO will break lose
    outside and they may even use alot more dump passes towards the
    outside.  BO and Marcus will catch a few more this week than usall and
    Minn wont know how to handle it...This game will be over at halftime..
    
44.941ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Thu Dec 20 1990 15:357
    Greg Townsend DE will finally make it to the Pro-Bowl in Feb.
    Townsend will be the only starter from the Raiders, but will be
    joined by three other teammates, that will be alternates, including:
    Bo Jackson RB, Steve Wisniewski G, and Don Mosebar C.
    
    His nobilityness, 
    Carlos
44.942SACT41::ROSSo.oThu Dec 20 1990 15:392
Bo Jackson - MLB All Star and NFL Pro Bowler.   The greatest athlete of
the 20th century.  
44.943MCIS1::DHAMELOrder your Don King Chia Pet nowThu Dec 20 1990 17:087
    
    > MLB All Star and NFL Pro Bowler.
    
    I didn't know he was a professional bowler, too.
    
    Dickstah
    
44.9441 Down, 1 To Go!!!DASXPS::KHARRISThu Dec 27 1990 13:2413
    Raiders beat the Vikings 28-24, with Schroeder having a big day. Big
    game this week against SD. John Friesz will replace Toliver at QB for
    SD. Bo is expected to sit out this game to rest a slightly sprained
    ankle. Win the game and win the division!!!! Aaron Wallace was all over
    the place against the Vikes. I don't understand his lack of playing
    time. The man is an awesome pass rusher. I like the Raiders this week 
    
    Raiders  31
    
    Chargers  13
    
    
    Kenn
44.945SOS please help out for rotiserrie league helpMPP6::CHILDSI could use a dramatic sting hereThu Dec 27 1990 14:424
Kenn, where did ya read about Toliver riding the pine? 

mike
44.946SALEM::DODAWorthy's X-mas list: Ho, Ho, HoThu Dec 27 1990 14:546
Mike,

FWIW, SD benched BJ during last weeks game because he was stinkin 
the joint up....

daryll
44.947Maybe I'll start Warren anyways...for insMPP6::CHILDSI could use a dramatic sting hereThu Dec 27 1990 15:335
Thanks Daryll I guess I should have know. oh well maybe Friez will stink
and they'll go back to BJ. 

mike