[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::sports_90

Title:OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid
Notice:Please review note 1.83 before writing anything.
Moderator:VAXWRK::NEEDLE
Created:Thu Dec 14 1989
Last Modified:Fri Dec 17 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:438
Total number of notes:50420

28.0. "The Boston Red Sox Note" by ISLNDS::RASMUSSEN (Unshakable Kingdom!) Fri Dec 15 1989 12:05

    This note is for discussing the Boston Red Sox.
    
    Gee, what a nice guy I am, a Yankee fan starting off a Sox note...
    
    Ras III
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
28.1Red Sox conferenceSTAR::YANKOWSKASO's in 1990: Miracle on 33rd St.Fri Dec 15 1989 12:064
    See also HARBOR::RED_SOX (press KP7 to add to your notebook).
    
    
    py
28.2I'm not making this upSALEM::RIEUWe're Taxachusetts...AGAINFri Dec 15 1989 16:103
       According to today's Globe Billy Buck wants to finish his career
    with the Sox.
                                    Denny
28.3He's already finished his career with the SoxAXIS::ROBICHAUDTheFew,TheProud,TheBoatrockersFri Dec 15 1989 16:160
28.4SASE::SZABOSamurai BartenderFri Dec 15 1989 16:176
    I heard that on the radio this morning.  He must've narrowed the gap
    between his legs since he left the Sox!  :-)
    
    Actually, he's building a house in Middleton, MA right now....
    
    Hawk
28.5What are they thinking?MUSKIE::WIERSBECKPlease let it get above 0 againFri Dec 22 1989 11:224
    Angels sign Smithson, parade in... any other city!!!  :*)
    
    
    Spud
28.639131::DHAMELI saw Noriega in K-martFri Dec 22 1989 12:0115
    
    For the out-of-towners, what the brilliant front office did was
    to neglect/forget to offer Smithson a contract by the specified
    date.  Same thing that sent Fisk on his way.
    
    Granted, Smithson is no all star, but it is another uncompensated
    loss due to an unforgivable blunder.  It's one thing to lose players
    to free agency, and another to see them go because of management
    stupidity.
    
    Gawd, this love-hate relationship is gonna be the death of me yet.
    
    -Dick
    
    
28.7CAM::WAYWe are such stuff as dreams are made onFri Dec 22 1989 12:408
Go Red Sox....

That front office has got to be the dumbest in all of sport.  I cain't
believe it.

Gee, Mr Gumby, I forgot....

Chainsaw
28.8BTOVT::AJA_MThe Pack is BackFri Dec 22 1989 12:462
    Re:-1 No way! The Yankee owner and his front office is the dumbest in
    all sports.
28.9Smithson--so what?EARRTH::ROURKEWed Dec 27 1989 16:534
    Are you people seriously upset because Mike Smithson is gone??????
    Let's get real----this equals addition via subtraction!!!!
    
    
28.10SHANE::PACIELLOWed Dec 27 1989 17:094
    I'd half to agree there. Smithson did little at most for the BOSOX.
    He was another arm on an already less than average staff.
    
    -Mike
28.11He might do OK there, then again...MUSKIE::WIERSBECKAll is quiet on New Years DayThu Dec 28 1989 11:196
    Oh come on guys, who is going to be your punching bag now, Reardon??
    
    :*)
    
    
    Spud
28.12STAR::YANKOWSKASFFL A rules!Thu Dec 28 1989 11:2512
    re the last few:
    
    If Smithson makes the Angels' 24-man roster, I'll be surprised.
    
    Smithson's one asset while with the Sox was his ability to fill a few
    different roles (long relief, middle relief, occasional starter).  He
    had some pretty good performances, but overall wasn't that great.  
    
    Red Sox still need a #4 and #5 starter.
                         
    
    py
28.13Believe it or not, I did hear it.KAOFS::MCCANNThu Dec 28 1989 13:347
       I heard a rumour up here in Ottawa about a possible blockbuster
    trade between the Montreal Expos and the Red Sox. The trade would have
    Tim Raines, Tim Wallach and Andres Gallaraga going to the Sox for
    Wade Boggs, Mike Greenwell and Ellis Burkes. Has their been any talk of
    this down there?
    
    Dennis
28.14HEURIS::METZGERIs it Ski season yet ?Thu Dec 28 1989 13:3814
Never happen...

Aint no way the sox would ever trade Boggs,Greenwell and Burkes at the same time
You might as well just swap names if thye were going to do this.

ALso,

 Lou Gorman is too Skeered to try a trade that big. The Sox need pitching.
They don't need to swap outfielders and infielders for more outfielders and
infielders.


metz
28.15AUSTIN::MACNEALBig MacThu Dec 28 1989 15:322
    That trade has been brought up a few times in the Red Sox notesfile. 
    The consensus basically agreed with Metz.  
28.16FXNBS::CASOThu Dec 28 1989 15:355
    
    
    THe latest one
    
    LEE SMITH AND SCOTT COOPER TO THE BRAVES FOR MERCKER-SMITH-GANT...
28.18SHANE::PACIELLOThu Dec 28 1989 16:063
    Sox wouldn't be stupid enough to give up both Greenwell and Burkes...
    
    -Mike
28.19DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Dec 28 1989 16:123
    Yes, they could.
    
    Lee
28.20SHANE::PACIELLOThu Dec 28 1989 18:214
    Oh yeah....I keep forgetting about Ruth and Lyle... :-)
    
    
    -Mike
28.21CAM::WAYAnd The Wall came tumblin' down...Tue Jan 02 1990 15:3911
I hear the Red Sox are going to pick up Joe Walton as assistant
GM...lend a whole new meaning to the term "green monster".

Anyway, I can see the Sox dealing Greenwell, but for some reason I 
can't see them trading Burkes...  At any rate, those three guys would
never go at the same time....even if Gorman was that stupid, and
personally I think the guy has ~4 brain cells, he knows he'd never
make if from Fenway to his car alive after the deal was announced...

JMHO,
Chainsaw
28.22Has It Really Been That Long ???DWOVAX::HUNTCarolina BoundFri Jan 05 1990 12:3725
                       *** This date in history ***
    
    On this date exactly 70 years ago on 5-Jan-1920, Boston Red Sox owner
    Harry Frazee sold the contract of Boston Red Sox pitcher-outfielder
    George Herman "Babe" Ruth to the New York Yankees who were owned by
    Colonel Jacob Ruppert.
    
    The sales price of the contract was an astronomical and sensational sum
    of $125,000.
    
    Ruth had just completed the 1919 season having hit an astonishing
    total of 29 home runs for Boston.
    
    The 1920 baseball season would feature a much livlier baseball and the
    outlawing of the spitball and other trick pitches such as the
    "shineball" and "scuffball".  Ruth would smash over 50 home runs in
    1920 and would completely and totally revolutionize the game of
    baseball for evermore.  Ruth became (and still is) one of America's
    all-time favorite sports heroes and the Yankees would go on to rule
    major league baseball until the mid-1960s.
    
    Oh, and the Boston Red Sox have, of course, never won a World Series
    since that fateful day.
    
    Bob Hunt
28.23Gee, thanks for reminding us Bob. It slipped by me. 8^)AXIS::ROBICHAUDGo GiantsFri Jan 05 1990 12:442
    
    
28.24STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Jan 05 1990 12:4810
    re .23
    
    The Baseball Encyclopedia lists the date of the Ruth-to-NY sale as 
    January 3, 1920.  
    
    In addition to the $125,000 purchase price, the deal also included a
    $300,000 loan to Frazee.
    
    
    py
28.25always on my mind......SASE::SZABOButt, Iris!Fri Jan 05 1990 12:504
    Bob, would you happen to know if the Yankee owner, Jacob Ruppert, had
    anything to do with Ruppert-Knickerbocker beer?
    
    Hawk
28.26Couldn't resistDWOVAX::HUNTCarolina BoundFri Jan 05 1990 12:508
    My pleasure, /Don, my pleasure.
    
    And to all the Sox fans, it's okay.  No need to thank me.  I'm sure
    you'd have done the same thing for me.  I'm sure someone out there will
    make sure and remind me that the Phils traded Larry Bowa for Ivan
    DeJesus and then threw in Ryne Sandberg as an afterthought.
    
    Bob Hunt
28.27Boston Fans: Just say NO to "No-No Nanette"AUSTIN::MACNEALBig MacFri Jan 05 1990 13:302
    Thanks, Bob.  And to think I was just getting over that 1986 film clip
    of Bill Buckner I saw on a 1980's sports recap on New Year's Eve.
28.29CAM::WAYI've seen the boys of summer in ruinFri Jan 05 1990 14:0428
First:

< Note 28.28 by VAXWRK::NEEDLE "Fascist moderator asshole" >
                                                  ^^^^^^^
 Please change this to Rectal Pore, since I find it offensive ;^)


re Sox:

	
Ah, a black day indeed.  Very often, I've wonder what life would
be like in that parallel universe that quantum theory often dictates,
where Ruth was not traded to finance a musical.

Would it be that the Red Sox were able to be the dominant force in
baseball?  Would it be that Ruth had even more homeruns because of
the park effect (tm) in Fenway?

Ah, the wonder of it all...

Perhaps even Bill Buckner would have played for the dreaded Yank-mes
and booted the ball in their first WS in 11 years....


Oh well, to dream the impossible dream....

Chainsaw

28.30Captain CarlUPWARD::HEISERRed Sea Beach ClubFri Mar 30 1990 15:536
    Anyone see Yaz on "Good Morning America" the other day?  He was
    promoting his new autobiography.
    
    Has anyone bought/read it yet?
    
    Mike
28.31SAGE::ROSSNoting Lambada-styleMon Apr 09 1990 16:094
According to the RED_SOX notesfile, Wade Boggs has started 1990 with
2 straight hits and an RBI in his first AB with a man on base.

1990 = The Boggs .400 Watch 
28.32ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMANMon Apr 09 1990 16:245
    
    Is that a new model by Timex?  "The Boggs .400 Watch"
    He'll probably come up with an injury and sit out the season.
    Its the only way he'll ever hit over .400.
    
28.33SAGE::ROSSSC for meMon Apr 09 1990 16:414
>    Its the only way he'll ever hit over .400.

Maybe we should start a Cory Snyder/Keith Hernandez .200 watch instead?

28.34Opening day is here finally!SALEM::DODASave me from tomorrowMon Apr 09 1990 16:413
Hmmm, .400 sounds more like Cleveland's winning pct.....

daryll
28.35ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMANMon Apr 09 1990 17:0010
    
    re: -2
    
    Snyder will hit .200 or better... maybe not much better.
    
    re: -1
    
    Atleast there are living people who have seen the Indians win
    a World Series.  Without a #4 and #5 starter, you can count the
    Sox out of it.
28.36CRBOSS::DERRYDo you know where nowhere is?Mon Apr 09 1990 17:076
    
>    Atleast there are living people who have seen the Indians win
>    a World Series.  Without a #4 and #5 starter, you can count the
>    Sox out of it.

 Hey, my gramps is alive.  He was about 5 last time the Sox won it all.
28.37PFSVAX::JACOBWe don't need no aluminum batsMon Apr 09 1990 17:099
    >> Atleast there are living people who have seen the Indians win
    >> a World Series.
    
    Yeah, true, but only because of advanced life support systems.
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
28.38BAUCIS::SAPPGet up,Get up,Get busy do it.....Tue Apr 10 1990 00:189
    
    
    How `Bout the Clevescum Indians!!!Perrenial Paper Champs of the AL!!!
    Cleveland has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the division.
    A 4/5 starter you say???The Indians need a
    1/2/3/4/5...............`Nuff said.
    
    
    O_J
28.39EARRTH::BROOKSSucker that stole the soul ...Tue Apr 10 1990 11:274
    Let's start the Joooooooosephineeeee Bell Watch : How many days
    before he's sent to the minors ?
    
    Doc
28.40UPWARD::HEISERdon't sample me, don't sample meTue Apr 10 1990 13:061
    BOSOX ARE IN FIRST!  BOSOX ARE IN FIRST!  BOSOX ARE IN FIRST!
28.41DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Tue Apr 10 1990 13:583
    true, but only 1 game out of last place.  :*)
    
    Lee
28.421 for the Yankees - GONG! (-:CRBOSS::DERRYDo you know where nowhere is?Tue Apr 10 1990 13:591
    
28.437983::RIEUIn search of...Mr Trout!Tue Apr 10 1990 14:023
       But Karen, the Yanks now have the highest paid player in Baseball.
    Ol' Spleenbinder has another 'lock' on the title!
                                          Denny
28.44ROCK::GRONOWSKIiceMANTue Apr 10 1990 14:162
    
    The yankees and indians are both undefeated... until tonight!
28.457 seasons @ 200+UPWARD::HEISERfrom the trendoid vortex of AmericaTue Apr 10 1990 14:594
    Imagine how much Mattingly would have received if he hit like Boggs!
    ;-)
    
    Mike
28.46FTMUDG::DUGGANTue Apr 10 1990 17:527
    re .31:
    "... two straight hits ... in his first at-bat"
    
    NOT BAAAD!
    
    ...mike
    
28.47They've lost 2 straight now!!PHILEM::SAPPBird,Magic,Jordan and ColemanSat Apr 14 1990 13:237
    The Red Sox suck!!!
    
    
    
    `Nuff said
    
    O_J
28.48CAM::WAYTag Steam Tudding stakes dipseline CikdSun Apr 15 1990 15:215
28.49Thank youBAUCIS::SAPPBird,Magic,Jordan and ColemanSun Apr 15 1990 21:381
    
28.50DASXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Mon Apr 16 1990 08:145
    O_J,
    
    Please correct your reply.  It should read "The Red Sox"[sic].
    
    Lee  :*)
28.51TRACTR::BACHOnward through the fog...Mon Apr 16 1990 17:573
    18 to nuthin'...  WoW
    
    Cub_Fan
28.5218-nuthin?CSC32::P_PAPACEKMon Apr 16 1990 19:065
    re .-1
    
    Forgive the ignorance,   18 to nuthin???   Todays Brewers - Sox score 
    perhaps.?
     
28.53FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Apr 16 1990 19:407
    18 runs, 20 hits, 1 error and no homers for the Brewers.  0 runs,
    2 hits, 1 error and 5 pitchers (Boddicker, Lamp, Kiecker, Rochford
    and Leister) for the Sox.
    
    We had a good time in the bleachers, though.
    
    John
28.54Great day for a Sox haterBOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Tue Apr 17 1990 08:4314
    Yeah, the most exciting part of the whole game was listening to
    'Saw take on five 12-year-olds in a verbal battle.
    
    The kids were from Medford, had it on their jackets.  'Saw says,
    "Where you guys from?"  One kid says, "Mefaa".  The kid then says,
    "Where are you from?"  'Saw, from Hartford, says, "Hafaa."  I was
    roollling.
    
    Seems like there was always someone returning from a beer run, which
    usually took an inning or so.  They'd sit down, look at the board,
    and say "9 to nuthin?  What happened while I was gone?"  Then, "13
    to nuthin?  What happened while I was gone?"  This just kept happening.
    
    Lee
28.55Needed the HelBus yesterday...CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Tue Apr 17 1990 10:5838
Yeah, those 12 year olds were tough.  I figure I gave 'em a good
handicap after all those beers I put down.

Actually, I wanted the blonde that was chaperoning them....

They did get a kick out of my Bart Simpson (who the hell are you)
T-shirt.

It was great meeting all the noters that I haven't met before.
It was great drinking all that beer and partying a little.

What was even better were the folks from MIT behind us.  Had a lot
of fun with them.  You shoulda heard 'em laugh when I mentioned
Avagadro's Number... (see, us old borderline alky's know a little about
science...)

The game was boring.  Joe "Six two and even" Morgan handled his pitching
staff about as well as a junkie without a fix would handle tying his
shoes, and the pitchers he did use pitched like little league.

Near the end of the game everyone was rooting for the Brewers to make
it 20...

Other highlights:

	The beer line was fun.  Met lots of interesting people, and
	had a good time.

	The Men's 4x100 swimming relay that took place in the bleachers
	Mens' Room was pretty interesting too.  This guys with a BC
	sweatshirt won hands down over this East German ringer on
	steroids...

Great weather, got a little sun, great beer got a little hungover....

Got to do it again sometimes....

Chainsaw (from Harfaa)
28.56FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Apr 17 1990 11:293
    Also, one destroyed beachball in a moment of temporary insanity.
    
    John
28.57DASXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Tue Apr 17 1990 11:3413
    Yeah, you really bit into that one, John.
    
    For those of you not there, beachballs were all over the place.
    
    For no apparent reason, John Hendry went wild when he managed to
    capture one.  He actually bit the nozzle right off the damn thing.
    The crowd lustily booed him.  Then, to make sure his prey was dead,
    he ripped it in two.
    
    Jeff Needle looked like Yasar Arrafat when he fashioned a hat out
    of one of the pieces.
    
    Lee
28.58Damn, did that feel good!FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Apr 17 1990 12:0710
    What was even better is that the loudest of the Meffa Children's
    Contingent was begging me for the ball.  I then bit into it (and
    I tore the valve completely out of it), then I ripped it in half,
    then I spiked the remnants and then gave the kids my best "Don't
    f**k with me, I'm crazy" look.  That was tough, because I was fighting
    to keep from bursting out laughing.
    
    Someone's got to take over for Bob Stanley now that he's gone.
    
    John
28.59SALEM::RIEUIn search of...Mr Trout!Tue Apr 17 1990 12:152
       John es mucho macho!!!
                                                  Denny  ;^)
28.60Even *I* was scared....CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Tue Apr 17 1990 12:2232
Yes, I will second that statement.  

Let me caution you folks, Do NOT, repeat DO NOT, misplace your
apostrophes.  John Hendry, our usually calm, steady statistician
can be a wild man.

Hulk Hogan, who was at the game, had this to say:

	I looked into those eyes, brother, and all of Hulkamania
	trembled.  The little Hulkamaniacs from Meffa in front
	of him we're wondrin' brother, what caused a look like
	that...

Mike Tyson, also at the game:

	I saw John Hendry's eyes, when he bit into that beach ball
	and I was scared.  I didn't have my mouthpiece, and I was
	scared that he might hit me and break my teef.

	Then Robin gave me some lithium and I was ecstatic.  I was
	just ecstatic...

The rest of us were quaking in our shoes at the virility, and savageness
of John's eyes...


Beach Balls 0
Hendry      1

(a better game than the Sox....)

Chainsaw
28.61FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Apr 17 1990 12:2516
    John was mucho pissed.  I hate beachballs and waves.  I believe
    in day baseball.                     
    
    In fact, I believe in the soul, the c*ck, the p*ssy, the small of a
    woman's back, the hanging curveball, high fiber, good scotch, that
    the novels of Susan Sontag are self-indulgent overrated crap.  I
    believe that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.  I believe that there
    ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing Astroturf (tm)
    and the Designated Hitter.  I believe in the sweet spot, soft core
    pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning instead of
    Christmas Eve, and I believe in long, slow, deep, soft wet kisses
    that last three days.
    
    So there.
    
    John
28.63CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Tue Apr 17 1990 12:308
I'm shocked.

First, yesterday I heard the RCASO actuallys resembles a normal person,
and now I'm seeing a John Hendry I've never seen before...

Clearly, John es mas mucho!  Clearly!!!

'Saw
28.64FRSBEE::BROOKSThe roof is on fire ! ...Tue Apr 17 1990 12:395
    I tell you, Hendry is a man's man ! HAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!!
    
    Boy, I never had so much fun staring down a brat in my life !
    
    Heh heh heh .....
28.65Where sickness thrivesBUILD::MORGANTue Apr 17 1990 12:504
    What do you guys expect?  The man's originally from Chelsea!  Do NOT, I
    repeat, DO NOT kcuf with anyone from Chelsea!
    
    					Steve  
28.66VAXWRK::NEEDLETue Apr 17 1990 12:578
>>    John was mucho pissed.  I hate beachballs and waves.  I believe
>>    in day baseball.                     

You've still got a way to go, John.  My bitten beachball count is 6 (and only
once did I think the crowd was going to riot against me).  Now if we could just
find some way to bite the wave.

j.
28.67Good time. Crazy folk.SASE::SZABOTue Apr 17 1990 13:0810
28.68CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Tue Apr 17 1990 13:1314
28.69SALEM::RIEUIn search of...Mr Trout!Tue Apr 17 1990 14:243
       who was the kicker for the Brewers yesterday and why did he miss
    all those xtra points?!!
                                          Denny
28.70UPWARD::HEISERi can c clearly nowTue Apr 17 1990 14:251
    Sox were only 2 touchdowns from making it a game!
28.71Hey 'Saw, how 'bout that Kevin Romine? Is he great or what?AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers...Pants for |CENSORED|sTue Apr 17 1990 14:281
    
28.72MARGO WUZ NO TOO BLAM!SASE::SZABOTue Apr 17 1990 14:348
28.73REFINE::ASHEYou better shop around...Tue Apr 17 1990 14:452
    ....Way to go, Crash Hendry
    
28.75FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Apr 17 1990 14:549
    Nah.  I'm here.  I'm still savoring my victory over one of the forces
    of evil.
    
    We also have to mention A&W's bright shining moment when she yelled
    at the Meffa contingent in front of us, in her best "Mom" voice,
    to put down their banner so we could watch the game.  Way to go,
    Alison.
    
    John
28.76CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Tue Apr 17 1990 15:0625
Romine :== the Biggest Dog-It Player since Dave Winfield...

I couldn't believe the guy.  He takes off after the shot into the
corner, and like all of a sudden he pulls up and just jogs.
Either that or my eyes flipped into slow motion....

Crash Hendry...too funny.

The rough waters in the men's room were exhausting.  Personally, I
entered the Water Polo competition, the Whitewater Kayaking, and
the Individual Medley.  I got a Silver Medal in the Kayaking.

The beer lines were pretty cool, but I kind of liked the Young SS
Security Forces better.  Give some guy with a hokey crew cut
a walkie-talkie and he things he's got a wicked testosterone increase
or something.

It's a good thing Hendry didn't REALLY go as wild as he could have,
because I doubt the Hitler Youth could have contained him....

Gawd, I keep seeing Needle with that beach ball on his haid, and
I'm cracking up.

I need a nap too...
Chainsaw
28.77AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers...Pants for |CENSORED|sTue Apr 17 1990 15:126
    	In case the rest of you were to drunk to see it, our little
    Meffa contingent made ESPN's SportsCenter last night at 7:00.
    Charlie Steiner made a comment about Fenway's Bleacher Creatures.
    If he only knew how true it was.
    
    				/Don
28.78CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Tue Apr 17 1990 15:2312
I think we should have made the Meffaa Kids honorary noters for the
day, or something like that.  They were pretty funny, and the
blonde that was with their chaperone certainly was nicer to look
at than Kevin Romine's Plate-Stackable Butt....

Where ya from? 

Meffaa, where you from?

Harfaa....

Chainsaw
28.79FSHQA2::AWASKOMTue Apr 17 1990 15:248
    I've been den mother to *lots* of groups of crazed sports fanatics.....
    
    That's how I know how to deal with the tribe from Meffa.  
    
    And how do you guys know that *I'm* normal???!!??
    
    
    A&W
28.80SASE::SZABOChainsaw est mucho ecstatico!Tue Apr 17 1990 15:262
    
    
28.81SASE::SZABOChainsaw est mucho ecstatico!Tue Apr 17 1990 15:316
28.82I'm Bart Simpson, who the hell are you?CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Tue Apr 17 1990 15:3310
Well, not only did the Meffa Mafia make the news, so did 
Mad Dog Hendry biting the Nozzle of that beach ball...

In fact, the guys on Sports Channel's Sprotsworld used a telestrator
to highlight John's technique.  Again, they mentioned the crazed look
in his eyes... 

Seriously folks, it was something to behold...

Chainsaw
28.83SASE::SZABOChainsaw est mucho ecstatico!Tue Apr 17 1990 15:416
28.84drunk and stupid is noway to go thru lifeHPSRAD::SANTOSIts hammer timeTue Apr 17 1990 15:5316
      Hey Doc, using my sunglasses to give those little guys the stare down
      was the key. The kid on the end (the one that looked like a little
      Charles Barkley) behaved for a whole 2 minutes.

      I'm sorry I missed John Hendry act, I think he might have seen that 
      turtle movie that is out now and he refuses to control is aggression.

      Frank Way looks just like one of the guys from the group Alabama.
      It was a pleasure to meet some of you guys and gals (Hawk,\Don,John 
      Hendry,Lee Timmons,A&W,Frank Way). I want to thank my buddy Jeff 
      Needle for introducing me as Ralph Caso to a few people.

      As for myself I have an all-time top 5 hangover today.

Chuck
28.85I don't know if the parents were thankful or terrified !EARRTH::BROOKSThe roof is on fire ! ...Tue Apr 17 1990 15:553
    Tis true Chuck, thanks for the shades ..... if you think the kid
    was intimidated, you shoulda saw the parents ! They thought I was
    going to slaughter the whole row !
28.86CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Tue Apr 17 1990 15:5519
Yes, yes, yes...

I'll tell you, in my time I've looked many crazed maniacal lunatics right
in the eye, and stared them down.  I've looked into the eyes of the
Hellspawn creatures that inhabit the boonies where I live.

Why once, I even stared down Ol' Scratch hisself, but never...never...

Never have I felt such fear when I looked into MadDogHendry's eyes
while his still foaming mouth clutched and shook that recently deceased
beach ball.  It was incredible.

Why, I almost expected him to just cut a swatch of carnage and destruction
right down to the field, and then to battle off a few of the Hitler Youth
SS Security guards while working his way out to the mound...

Scary thought.....

chainsaw
28.87FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Apr 17 1990 15:5913
    I don't run fast enough to avoid the security troops while on the
    way to the mound.  Heck, I probably wouldn't have even gotten as
    far as Kevin Romine before being tackled and hauled off to the Charles
    Street jail.
    
    What I really wanted was that football being tossed around.  I believe
    it was one of those foam rubber ones.  If y'all thought the destruction
    of the beachball was crazy, you should have seen me had I got my
    hands on that.
    
    And, I was completely sober too.
    
    John
28.88eyes that would make Mike Singletary proud!UPWARD::HEISERSimon Peter's School of SurfTue Apr 17 1990 16:051
    
28.89CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Tue Apr 17 1990 16:0916
The esteemed Mr Santos waxes too humble folks.

For a Cowboys fan, he's an okay guy.

You see, he entered the Olympics going on in the baffroom.  Amazing
waters sports athlete.

He took gold in the 200 meter backstroke, and the 100 meter freestyle.
He captained the Water Polo team to a gold medal, and finished 
second in the Grand Prix Jet Ski race...


And he wasn't the only one to have a hangover...

BLAM BLAM BLAM,
Chainsaw
28.90FSHQA2::AWASKOMTue Apr 17 1990 16:5011
    Gentlemen -
    
    The John Hendry known and beloved of the noters is a man of many,
    many talents.  Factual reporting is but one of them.  So is his
    ability to subdue a beach ball.
    
    Please also consider that JHENDRY was the *only* gentleman there
    to know both women in attendance, and to arrive with one and leave
    with the other :-) .....
    
    A&W
28.91EARRTH::BROOKSThe roof is on fire ! ...Tue Apr 17 1990 16:535
    re .90
    
    Oooooh .......
    
    I tell you, the things John does to impress the women .....
28.92CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Tue Apr 17 1990 17:0017
28.93Was Al Pacino 'Cruising' there?SHALOT::MEDVIDKristos Vos KresWed Apr 18 1990 10:4812
>Amazing waters sports athlete.
>
>He took gold in the 200 meter backstroke, and the 100 meter freestyle.
>He captained the Water Polo team to a gold medal, and finished 
>second in the Grand Prix Jet Ski race...
    
    Water sports?  Gold, as in shower?  Hmmmmmm.  Just what kind of
    afternoon did you gentlemen have.  I was planning on going to Fenway
    while on a business trip in May, but if that kind of stuff goes on...
    
    	--dan'l
    
28.94Baffroom Olympics...CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Wed Apr 18 1990 11:2929
Dan'l --

It was amazing!  By about the 3rd inning, or the Red Sox trailing
by 9, I forget which, I went to the bathroom.

At that point in time there was about three to five inches of water
on the floor.  There's this old usher in there setting up swimmers'
starting blocks and next thing you know he's yelling "Last call
for Individual Medlay".  So, I says to myself, what the heck...

I stripped down to my shorts, grabbed lane 8 and swam.  I didn't 
do that well, so I got dressed, went back out, grabbed two
beers, and watched some of the game.

Nexted time I went in there, they were starting the White Water
Kayaking Event.  I signed up, got this boat, and rowed my a__
off, and lo and behold, I finished SECOND!  I got me a Silver medal.

Since I'd told the guys about it after that first swim, nexted thing
I know there all in there.  Jeez, Chuck was playin' water polo
(the East German team was tough, but we beat 'em) and Hawk was 
doing the backstroke....

By all means, dude, go in May, but get into TRAINING NOW!!!!  The
competition is really stiff, and you've got to watch out for the
Eastern Bloc Countries.....

Hope this helps,
'Saw
28.95AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers...Pants for |CENSORED|sWed Apr 18 1990 11:407
28.96And the final tally is in!CAM::WAYWill you yield, and this avoid?Wed Apr 18 1990 11:415
	Q:  How many beers did Chainsaw have at the Patriots' Dayu
	    Sox game?

	A:  Avagadro's Number!
28.97just love the boston soap operaCNTROL::CHILDSThis guy's a waste of skinThu Apr 19 1990 11:4516
    
    Did anyone else read Callahan reply's to little Mikey Greenwall's
    tirade with the press?
    
    forget how it went exactly but Greenteeth (tm) was threating to wring
    a few writers neck and this guy recommend that the writer just pretend
    to be a low and away slider with the bases loaded and Mike would be
    sure to miss......of course his buddy Boggsies back him all the way on
    what beast the sportswriters in boston are....
    
    and Clemens will throw out his arm by June. He still doesn't know how
    to pitch. He still wants to overpower everybody. He really overpowered
    Ventura last night....
    
    ;^)....
    
28.987983::RIEUStanley, won't you please come home!Thu Apr 19 1990 12:013
       Are the sportswriters Dreamwell (tm) is threatening to strangle, the
    same ones he was whining to when he wanted more dough?
                                         Denny
28.99IneptSALEM::DODADon't have a cow, manThu Apr 19 1990 12:099
Great line in the Red Sox file I think,

"During spring training, Roger Clemens wore #14 to honor Jim 
Rice, during the regular season, Mike Greenwell will honor Rice 
by playing like him..."

ha ha

daryll
28.100AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers...Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Apr 19 1990 13:199
	Enough of this negative talk.  It's the nattering nabobs of
negativism (NNoN) who are causing the Sox to slide.  Not the lack
of pitching, not the lack of a first baseman, not the fact that Mike
Greenwell treats every pitch and every fly ball to the outfield like
a tax audit (to be avoided at all costs), not that thier keystone
combination has the range of a sixpack of Keystone beer.  It's the
writers, it's the fans.  It's the same old story.

				/Don
28.101DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Apr 19 1990 14:0214
    Slasher, you got it right.  Them righters is the real problem with
    the Sox.  
    
    Right after them Sox beat my Tigers for the 3rd time, one Globe
    writer commented on how tame the Tigers are, and how they are sure
    to be in the cellar at the end of the season.  Another Globe writer in
    a different column, same page, was touting the Sox as the greatest
    team ever, their having truly stomped that Detroit team. .  Pure
    bullshit, both of them.

    Wonder who was in the booth last Monday?  Boy he sure screwed the
    Bostons that day.  :*)
    
    Lee
28.102AXIS::ROBICHAUDCyYoung,SandyKoufax,SportswritersThu Apr 19 1990 14:102
    
    
28.103CAM::WAYOr, guilty in defence, be thus destroyed?Thu Apr 19 1990 15:3113
28.104AXIS::ROBICHAUDHercules,Thor,RayBourqueThu Apr 19 1990 15:598
    	No 'Saw, after following baseball for all these years I've come
    to the conclusion that any team's sportswriters cain ruin a great
    ballplayer's career.  Their barbs and criticisms cain do more damage
    than any great pitcher could ever dream of doing.  Whenever a team
    or player goes bad who's to blame?  The media.  I'll tell ya, the
    Sox should sign some of these media guys up as pitchers. 
    
    				/Don
28.105CAM::WAYChainsaw, The Great CorruptorThu Apr 19 1990 16:262
Well, then I wanna draft Telendar, because he might not throw a
great barb, but he certainly can get his wit over....
28.106Wrigly & Comisky last year, Fenway this year; what a job!SHALOT::MEDVIDHappy Earth Day!Fri Apr 20 1990 16:0611
    Hey, I just found out I'm going to run up to Lotus on Monday, April 30
    to deliver some ALL-IN-1 training.  Schedule says the Sox are playing
    Seattle.  True?
    
    Can any of you guys give me hints on how to get two tickets?  Should I
    rely on scalpers or is there a cheaper way?  At Wrigley, they had SRO
    seats for $5.  Does Fenway?
    
    Thanks in advance.
    
    	--dan'l
28.107CAM::WAYYeah, Ma, it's Cliff..your SON CliffFri Apr 20 1990 16:0911
Dan'l --

Talk to the Hawkstah, but I know you can get bleacher seats for
$6.  

Make sure you visit the Men's Room off the bleacher area.  That is
the site of the Baffroom Olympics, something you shouldn't miss, and
which will enhance your Fenway experience....

Good luck,
'Saw
28.108FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Apr 20 1990 16:136
    A Monday night game this early in the season should be no problem
    for getting tickets anywhere in the ballpark.
    
    Mariners are also here May 1 and 2.
    
    John
28.109Dreaming of the Green MonsterSHALOT::MEDVIDHappy Earth Day!Fri Apr 20 1990 16:1711
    'Saw,
    
    I've already packed my water polo cap.  Yeah, I actually have one from
    my water polo days.  Looks stupid as hell.  Of course, I wouldn't say
    that to the face of most H20 polo players.  They're a mean lot.
    
    John,
    
    Does that mean I can just grab two (tickets that is) at the gate?
    
    	--dan'l
28.110IAMOK::AHEARNRams vs. Bengals in SB XXVFri Apr 20 1990 16:275
    Yes.  There will be ample tickets available at the gate.
    
    
    
    Nelly
28.11115436::LEFEBVREWatcher of the skiesFri Apr 20 1990 16:504
    Make sure you wear a condom over your haid...Cain't be to safe swimmin'
    'round the floors of the Fenway Baffroom.
    
    Mark.
28.112SASE::SZABOFreakin' Lunatics Club CardholderFri Apr 20 1990 16:525
28.113CAM::WAYWatcher of the thighsFri Apr 20 1990 16:528
Nah, ain't no problem.  Just look at me 'n Hawk.  We did it...No
problem....

Seriously, there's a lot of chlorine in that water, so you'd better
bring your swimmer's shampoo ....


chainsaw
28.114GRANPA::DFAUSTSixers=Atlantic Div ChampsFri Apr 20 1990 16:546
    I'll be in the greater NE area between May 29 and June 1. Will the Red
    Sox be home for any of those dates, and if so, who will they be
    playing?
    
    Dennis
    
28.115CAM::WAYMa, it's Cliff...your SON Cliff!Fri Apr 20 1990 16:546
28.11615436::LEFEBVREWatcher of the skiesFri Apr 20 1990 17:0915
    < Note 28.114 by GRANPA::DFAUST "Sixers=Atlantic Div Champs" >


>    I'll be in the greater NE area between May 29 and June 1. 
    
    Greater NE area?  Sounds like New Hampshire.  :^)
    
>    Will the Red Sox be home for any of those dates, and if so, who will 
>    they be  playing?
  
    Sorry, the Sox will be in Texas getting shut out by Ryan et. al.
    
    Mark.  
    Dennis

28.117GRANPA::DFAUSTSixers=Atlantic Div ChampsFri Apr 20 1990 17:479
    
    re:-1 
    
    Actually, Littleton.
    But that's still far enough away from Arlington, TX to make going to
    the game geographically unattractive.
        ;*)
    
    Dennis
28.118MCIS1::DHAMELFriends of Animals game supper, May 1stMon Apr 23 1990 10:426
    
    Interesting observation:  The Bruins outscored the Red Sox this
    pasted weekend, and the Sox played two more games!
    
    -Dick
    
28.119The Red Sux...CAM::WAYGuest Host on The Nude Talk ShowMon Apr 23 1990 11:589
Was that Kutcher or Greenwell who bobbled that single in Saturday's
debacle?

I saw the replay on three newscasts and I sure couldn't tell.

At any rate, I have a feeling I might be opening some beers for Beak
this year...

'Saw
28.12015436::LEFEBVREHonesty is money in the cemetaryMon Apr 23 1990 12:083
    Neither, it was Romine.
    
    Mark.
28.121CAM::WAYGuest Host on The Nude Talk ShowMon Apr 23 1990 12:361
Oh!  That STIFF again....
28.122The media did in the Sox again this weekend...AXIS::ROBICHAUDSaveOurFatPeople-CelebrateGirthDayMon Apr 23 1990 13:521
    
28.123Go Bruins!CRBOSS::DERRYMikey Greenwell for Pampers. WAAAH!Mon Apr 23 1990 14:122
    Lamp looked pretty good yesterday.  With the exception of Pena, can't 
    say much for the bats. 
28.124CAM::WAYGuest Host on The Nude Talk ShowMon Apr 23 1990 14:154
I think the bats were out celebratiing EArth Day, along with
the squirrels, the robins, and the ducks, and the gators...

'Saw
28.125say it aint so!SCCAT::BOUCHARDKen Bouchard WRO3-2Thu Apr 26 1990 17:207
    OH NO! You mean to tell me that the Red Flops have actually let Bill
    Buckner back on the team? (saw it on TV last night...couldn't believe
    my eyes) Little wonder that Boston is the perennial goat of the AL when
    they allow the guy who earned them the most infamy to return.This has
    to have a negative impact on ticket sales!
    
    Ken
28.126MCIS1::DHAMELHindenburg, Titanic, CanadiensThu Apr 26 1990 17:257
    
    Apparently all is forgiven with Billy-Buck.  When he was announced
    on opening day he received the loudest, longest cheers (not jeers)
    of all.
    
    Dickster
    
28.127VAXWRK::NEEDLEThu Apr 26 1990 17:348
At the game on Tuesday, he came out as a pinch-hitter and received a 1/2 minute
standing ovation before being announced.  After hitting an RBI bloop single, he
got another standing ovation for about a minute.

I've got to admit I admire his gumption.  He deserves to have won the fans
back.  I hope he sticks but don't think he has a chance in hell.

j.
28.128CAM::WAYA fool's bolt is soon shotThu Apr 26 1990 18:065
The two preceeding replies are what will happen to you if you
don't JUST SAY NO.  [many many 8^)]

Billy Buck was a stiff, is a stiff, and always will be a stiff.

28.129VAXWRK::NEEDLEThu Apr 26 1990 19:047
>> Billy Buck was a stiff, is a stiff, and always will be a stiff.

Yeah, but he's OUR stiff.  

Anyway, didn't mean to start a rathole.  Just wanted to get my opinion in.

j.
28.130Buckner should playJURAN::MCKAYThu Apr 26 1990 19:3611
    Billy Buck is not a stiff!!!!  It's funny how everyone can remember
    one boot which cost us but can't remember what a great contribution
    he made while a sox player.  I'm sure some stat monger out there can
    supply some info that backs this up.  I think it would be a mistake
    to get rid of him and I also would like to see him as the everyday
    first baseman.  I have the weekend season package and I'd rather
    watch Buckner than the combined Quintana, Robidoux.  He always could
    hit and he always will be able to hit, and he plays adequate defense
    so let him play and dump one of the others.
    
    Jimbo
28.131CAM::WAYA fool's bolt is soon shotFri Apr 27 1990 11:027
Yeah, I heard he went to China in the off season, where the surgeons
replaced his ankles with these new bionic things....8^)

Yes, Billy Buck is our stiff, and we all know that everyone needs a 
good stiff one from time to time...

'saw
28.132My great aunt can run faster than Buckna.JACKAL::DIGGINSBoy I wish I had Talant!Fri Apr 27 1990 12:326
    
    Speak for yourself, 'SAW!!! 8^)
    
    
    
    Steve_who_hopes_yer_talking_about_drinks
28.133CAM::WAYA fool's bolt is soon shotFri Apr 27 1990 12:484
28.134As D. Tracy would say:"non compos mentis"SCCAT::BOUCHARDKen Bouchard WRO3-2Fri Apr 27 1990 15:584
    They gave Buckner a standing ovation,huh? The Boston fans kinda remind
    me of the voters in NH who re-elected a guy in jail.
    
    Ken (who's glad he's not a Bosox fan anymore)
28.135Get off the ego trip, Buckner, and retire!4159::NAZZAROHal! Open the pod bay door!!Fri Apr 27 1990 17:0916
    Billy-Buck is perfect for the Sox, the kind of me-first-second-
    and-always kinda guy the Sox have always had on their roster.
    He'd have fit in perfect with those Yaz-Evans teams of "25 cabs
    for 25 players."  I'll bet he and Boggs are best buddies, swapping
    stories about how many hits they have while not moving runners
    along in games.
    
    I hate it when the only reason a player stays in any professional
    sport is to satisfy his ego.  Buckner just had to prove to himself
    that hew could do it, which is fine if you're a marathoner, golfer
    or tennis player.  But in a team sport, even one like baseball where
    individual skills are prized as much as team goals, a player should
    put the needs of the team ahead of personal goals.  Buckner shows
    me no signs of doing that.
    
    NAZZ
28.137WFOV11::MORRISONBeware the Roulette Wheel of DeathFri Apr 27 1990 17:278
    
    Steven,
       I don't think "held down" is the correct term. It was more
    along the lines of "couldn't get up 'cause the fans were look-
    ing for his wallet"
    
    Bull~
     
28.138CAM::WAYA fool's bolt is soon shotFri Apr 27 1990 17:527
Well, that Buckner ego cost the Sox a series.

We all know that whoever-the-farg-the-manager was wanted Buck
out.  But Buck threw a tantrum, spread his legs and the
rest is history....

'Saw
28.139Bill Buckner: roadblock to player developmentWNDMLL::SCHNEIDEROh+Fri Apr 27 1990 17:5319
    >Billy Buck is not a stiff!!!!  It's funny how everyone can remember
    >one boot which cost us but can't remember what a great contribution
    >he made while a sox player. 
    
    *I* do remember the contributions that Buckner made, and let me assure
    you, they were not "great".  He was fortunate for a time (such as his
    time in Wrigley and Fenway, the 2 best hitting parks) that his stats
    looked decent in some categories.  He wasn't fooling me though.  I
    agree with Frank: Stiff, all the way.  Overrated stiff.
    
    >I think it would be a mistake
    >to get rid of him and I also would like to see him as the everyday
    >first baseman. 
    
    You must dislike the Sox even more than I do.  I'd make great company
    at a Yankee game with those season tickets you have.  That way we could
    both root against the Sox, and for Buckner to get more playing time.
    
    Dan
28.140VAXWRK::NEEDLESat Apr 28 1990 21:443
>>Anyway, didn't mean to start a rathole.

Well, so much for this.
28.141YAZ ball and baseball cards at auction39225::LOMBARDOHe spoke the Incarnation!Thu May 03 1990 02:1419
    
    I know of a charity auction this Friday night - May 4th at the Marlboro 
    Girls Club to benefit New Covenant Christian School in Ashland, Ma.
    
	I am helping to co-ordinate it.  Tonight we found out that we are 
        having Carl 'YAZ' Yastremski autograph and  Federal Express
    	a baseball to us tomorrow.  (His daughter is moving to a house
        that one of the auction coordinators currently lives in.)
    
    	We also have 15 shoeboxes full of baseball cards to be auctioned.
    
    The viewing of the items starts at 6pm and the auction at 7pm.
    
    The Marlboro Girls CLub is on Pleasant street which intersects route
    20.

Please contact me, Lisa Lombardo DTN 291-0590 or REJOIC::LOMBARDO for further
    details on any of the above.  thank you.  or at home 508-485-2272 or
    508-485-3630
28.142AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Fri May 04 1990 15:025
28.143LEVERS::STROUTno hero in your tragedy...Fri May 04 1990 15:092
    	What's the Red Sox record this year anyways?  Is there division
    shaping up to be a Least?
28.144What are you gonna do with a quarter?SALEM::DODATHEmoonMYbuttWHICHisBIGGER?nextONoprahFri May 04 1990 15:146
About even to this point, 4 teams over .500 in the East.
3 playing over .500 in the west.

Of course, you could always pick up a paper....

daryll
28.145LEVERS::STROUTno hero in your tragedy...Fri May 04 1990 15:163
    dam papers always gone when i get here.  bugs the hell outta me.
    besides, i'm not too much of a freakin' baseball lunatic, just
    wunnerin' what the sit was.  tanks.
28.146FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri May 04 1990 20:077
    Announced at 510 EDT tonight - Lee Smith to St Louis for Tom Brunansky,
    even up.  Gets rid of the log jam at short reliever, improves the
    right field situation, probably consigns Evans to the bench for
    the rest of his career, does nothing to help the starting pitching.
    But it's a start.
    
    John
28.147DREAMN::MCDONOUGHSat May 05 1990 00:197
    I was hoping this trade wasn't going to materialize. I think StL.
    got the better of deal. Stats anyone for Brunansky for the last
    couple of years?
    
    -Dick
    
28.148SAGE::ROSSQuarantinedMon May 07 1990 08:5810
I don't like the Smith for Brunansky deal UNLESS the Red Sox also
make a move to trade Greenwell or Burks for a very good starting 
pitcher.  Why?   Well, what hope do guys like Mickey Pina, Phil
Plantier, Carlos Quintana, etc. have of making it to the majors
as everyday players if the Sox keep all three OF for three or four
more years?

I'd like to see a Burks to the Mets deal for Darling and Magadan.  
Or how about Greenwell to the Royals for Seitzer and Montgomery?

28.149He's already goneBUILD::MORGANMon May 07 1990 11:1613
>Why?   Well, what hope do guys like Mickey Pina, Phil
>Plantier, Carlos Quintana, etc. have of making it to the majors
>as everyday players if the Sox keep all three OF for three or four
>more years?
    
    Doug, Brunansky will be gone next winter.  I'll predict right now, the
    Sox won't sign him.  Manangement already planted the rumor.  He's from
    California and has expressed an interest in playing there.  Plantier
    and/or Pina will be with the big club next year.  Much cheaper
    salaries.
    
    					Steve
    
28.150he's a boneheadCNTROL::CHILDSThe odor of the Fungus never foulerMon May 07 1990 14:569
    
    that's right Mac, I am. The guy has 3 or 4 pitches but everytime he
    gets in trouble or batter gets to him, he throws the heat. I know the
    batter knows. In the first few innings he gets by with it but by the
    late innings they catch up to him.....
    
    I don't question his physical abitlity just his mental ability...
    
    mike
28.151Pahk the cah and meet at the Golden Ahches.SHALOT::MEDVIDthe infinite complexities of loveTue Jun 12 1990 10:185
    A huge "THANK YOU" to John Hendry for helping me aquire tickets to
    Sunday's game at Fenway Pahk.  The Sox stunk, but I got to see a great game
    by Candiotti.  The knuckleballer was at his best.
    
    	--dan'l
28.152Did he bite any beachballs for you?VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Tue Jun 12 1990 10:330
28.153FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Jun 12 1990 11:537
    I wasn't there.  I got him in contact with someone who had a pair
    of extra tickets to sell.  And Jeff, with all the beachballs flying
    around on Friday night, not one of them came anywhere close to me
    and I was sitting in the bleachers.  They must have all developed
    radar!
    
    John
28.154VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Tue Jun 12 1990 18:578
I got my bicuspids into two of the rainbow-colored demons.  Nearly cost me my
life.  Some ass in the upper deck spent the rest of the game throwing garbage
at my head.  Sure made friends with the people around me who also got pummeled. 
Of course, they were too busy jumping around after beachballs and waiting for
the wave to care too much.  Got 3 cokes spilled on me because these jerks were
going after beachballs.

j.
28.155ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 13 1990 13:002
    
    Yanks spank hapless Sox...  he he he
28.156AXIS::ROBICHAUDSCS...Call Anytime, AnywhereWed Jun 13 1990 13:2112
28.157ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 13 1990 13:236
    
    Wasn't Cleveland 7 games behind Boston on sunday morning?
    
    
    Less than hapless - last world championship 1948
    ????????????????? - last world championship 1918
28.158AXIS::ROBICHAUDSCS...Call Anytime, AnywhereWed Jun 13 1990 13:264
    	So the Indians picked up a whopping two games.  Whew, better
    call the Fire Department, that team is smoking!
    
    				/Don
28.159Can't ever remember them doin' muchBUILD::MORGANWed Jun 13 1990 13:287
    In my 33 years of living, I've never once heard of Cleveland having a
    respectable baseball team.  Yup, I remember McDowell and Collovito, but
    have any of you Cleveland fans been around to see them win ANYTHING?
    
    And you have to love the way they just pack that stadium every night.
    
    					Steve
28.160DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Wed Jun 13 1990 13:4713
    Steve, I'm older so I remember the 1954 Indians.  Truly, a GREAT
    team during the regular season, won 111 games, I believe, out of
    154.
    
    But, come crunch time, they got wiped, swept, zapped by the Giants.
    So, they were a REGULAR team during the Fall Classic.
    
    By the way, the Indians were known for great pitching, rather than
    hitting or defense, during the 50's.  Early Wynn, Bob Feller, Bob
    Lemon, etc.  Not that they didn't have hitters, such as Colavity,
    Rosen, but their forte was pitching.
    
    Lee
28.161WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his Lips...Know New Taxes!!Wed Jun 13 1990 13:593
       Cleveland fans must live in the past when it concerns ANY sport.
    One of their teams doesn't even have a past.
                                        Denny
28.162Yup, lots of exciting games over the years!!!!TURKEY::J_HALPINWed Jun 13 1990 14:069

	I think the most exciting baseball game to take place in Cleveland
during my lifetime (I'm not as old as Lee :->!!! ) was a promotional night
back arround the early 70's, Nickle-a-Beer night!!! I beleive the riot
squad had to be called in to clear out the stadium!!! I can't remember
who the Indians played or who won however....

JimH
28.163Can't remember who won though...ROULET::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Wed Jun 13 1990 14:2918
    
    The Indians played the Texas Rangers.....I was there man......
    
    It was something else.....the streaker.........another streaker.....
    A woman who sat just 5 rows down from my Dad and I got up and jumped
    the fence, running out onto the field with her purse in hand, went
    over to the home plate ump and hit him with her purse, several times.
    She was escorted off the field.  You should have seen all the trash
    that landed on the field....  After the game...there police all
    over the place...on horses...billy clubs out!  
    
    I wasn't able to drink then but I do know Good Old Dad had his 
    share of those 5 cent cups.  Lots of the guys around us were trying
    to catch foul balls with their cups...some over a foot stacked.
    It was so funny!
    
    The Chief
    
28.164ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Jun 13 1990 14:325
    
    re: -1
    
    Indians v.s. the Rangers, I believe...  free entertainment!
    
28.165courtesy of Marv Albert..SALEM::DODAFriends don't let friends drive ChevysWed Jun 13 1990 14:397
I remember that. The management boys were real morons on that 
one. .05 beer night, what did they expect?

Next it'll be "Hard liquor and handgun" night.

daryll

28.16615436::LEFEBVREPost no p-namesWed Jun 13 1990 14:4711
    < Note 28.165 by SALEM::DODA "Friends don't let friends drive Chevys" >
                         -< courtesy of Marv Albert.. >-

>Next it'll be "Hard liquor and handgun" night.
>
>daryll

    Don't none of you booze-a-holics come messin' around us handgun
    owners.
    
    Mark.
28.167Disco sucksBUILD::MORGANWed Jun 13 1990 15:3411
    Wasn't there a game a few years back called "Disco something-or-other"?
    Anyone who brought a disco album got in for 1/2 price or nothing.  I
    also think there was a planned concert after the game that ended up
    being cancelled because of people chucking albums around like frisbees.
    Then there was a bonfire in center field where all the albums were
    burned.  
    
    I can't recall the city this game was played in, but for some reason I
    thought it was Cleveland or Chicago?
    
    					Steve
28.168FSHQA1::AWASKOMWed Jun 13 1990 15:404
    It was a Bill Veeck special at Comisky in Chicago.  (I cain't believe
    I know this :-) )
    
    A&W
28.169Disco bombed at CommiskeyPOBOX::ALVESDolphin-Free ComputingWed Jun 13 1990 15:438
    
    I believe that disco debacle occurred at Commiskey when Bill Veeck
    owned the team in the mid to late 70's.
    
    Again, my memory isn't very clear, but wasn't it a double-header, and
    the White Sox had to forfeit the second game?  
    
    Brian
28.170FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Jun 13 1990 16:1215
    It was an anti-disco night at Comiskey.  The festivities were held
    between games of a doubleheader.  A small riot ensued and the Sox
    did have to forfeit.
    
    My favorite promotion was seat cushion night at Fenway back in 1982.
    It was vs the Indians and the game got out of hand quickly.  The
    cushions were great for clapping together to celebrate a home run.
    They were even better as frisbees scaled onto the field.  A bunch
    of them ended up in the Sox bullpen, and Bob Stanley lit them on
    fire and did an Indian War Dance around the fire.  Needless to say,
    the Sox have never done that again.
    
    No, I didn't destroy any seat cushions.  I kept mine.
    
    John
28.171WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his Lips...Know New Taxes!!Wed Jun 13 1990 16:173
       Just got some tickets for the DECWORLD set-up crew for the 29th vs.
    Texas, anyone else gonna be there?
                                         Denny
28.172CSC32::J_HERNANDEZNo feathers on me!!!Wed Jun 13 1990 16:246
    re promotions. 
    
    In "The Bronx Zoo" Sparky Lyle talks about Reggie bar day. Where
    everyone at the game got a free Reggie Bar. During the game Reggie hit
    a homer and the fans covered the field with the bars. Some kids ended
    up running onto the field and scooped up a bunch of 'em.
28.173Disco DemolitionCSC32::P_PAPACEKWed Jun 13 1990 16:5514
    
    re: Disco night
    
    Perhaps this belongs in White Sox note, but it was called Disco
    Demolition.  The Disco records were blown up in between games of the
    double header.  Fans then poured out onto the field tearing up sod,
    bases etc.   The Sox forfeited due to unplayable conditions.
    
    Steve Dahl now a famous and controversial DJ in Chicago was mc for 
    the event.  One of his early claims to fame, and the subject still
    comes up frequently in Chicago.    Disco did Suck, so I suppose it 
    was worth the Sox forfeiting a game.
    
     
28.174STAR::YANKOWSKASThis is gonna be funWed Jun 13 1990 17:448
    I read somewhere recently that to this day they're still finding
    slivers of disco records in the Comiskey Park turf.
    
    Getting back to the other Sox they better not look back, something
    black and orange might be gaining on them... ;-)
    
    
    py
28.175Narrow those tastes Frankie....PARVAX::WARDLECounting the cars on the NJ Tpk...Wed Jun 13 1990 18:253
    Frank Way loved Disco...right Frankwa?
    
    JoJ
28.176Cause I'm a hoochie-coochie man...CAM::WAYTerminate with extreme prejudiceThu Jun 14 1990 11:5926
Not by a long shot.

During the disco era I was in college.  As a music major we thought
the whole thing was pretty bogus.

What we were doing at the time was cramming four or five people and 
their axes into practice rooms, locking the door, lighting up, 
and playing some of the meanist blues this side of the Delta.

Muddy Waters, B.B. King, John Lee Hooker, Howlin' Wolf...that's
what we cut our teeth on.  Any tune by Willie Dixon was fair
game...  We even had some original tunes, and when this got really
"hazy" we'd just jam for a while.

Learned to play a little harp during this period too, althought I couldn't
come close to some of the dudes we had in these sessions.

"Gypsy Woman tol' my mama, before I was born
Got a boy-child comin', gonna be a son-of-a-gun...."


So, while everyone was doing the hustle, we were tryin' to pay our dues....


Course, rooting for the Sox during that period made it easy to play
the blues!  8^)
28.177COBRA::DINSMOREMadonna and ASICS.. A WINNING COMBOThu Jun 14 1990 14:427
    thats cool about harp and all, as long as ya didnt  play any  flutes
      frankie
    
    haaaaaaa
    
    dinz
    
28.178CAM::WAYTerminate with extreme prejudiceThu Jun 14 1990 15:2510
Nah, we left the flute playing for all those Jethro Tull types....

But man, I'll tell ya, we had some guys who played harp that if you
closed your eyes, you'd have thought it was Little Walter or 
James Cotton!

As the late Sammy Davis Jr woulda said "Those cats could really play...
and I really mean that...."

'Saw
28.179PARVAX::WARDLECounting the cars on the NJ Tpk...Mon Jun 18 1990 17:353
    C'mon Frank, admit it, you were a Disco Boy.
    
    JoJ
28.180CAM::WAYTerminate with extreme prejudiceMon Jun 18 1990 18:0814
Not by a long shot, JoM!

You have to remember at that time I was heavily into music.  It
occupied probably 80% of my day in school, and I got heavily into
many types of music, from medieval stuff right up through the most
far out avant garde stuff you can imagine.

Disco, musically speaking, had about as much substance as tissue
paper, so we just passed it off.  We really were into much more
complex stuff, or blues...

Never did like disco, nope.

'Saw
28.181Guess he does have morals, Mike. (-:CRBOSS::DERRYLandOfTheFreeButOnlyIfYouAgree....Tue Jun 19 1990 09:033
    Clemens got slapped around last night....  
    
    Never got out of the second inning.  7 H, 6 R, 3 ER, 2 BB, 3 SO.
28.182She's a Brickhouse....CNTROL::CHILDSDiggin the lawn 6/20 w/ the TWOSTue Jun 19 1990 10:279
 Must have been Phil Oneil's columun in the sunday Telegram Karen ;^)...

 was the mound too high last night? perhaps he was getting squezzed?

 Frank, cmon Disco was great. the music stunk but boy the heavy bass beat
 used to get the women hot and the clubs were filled with em'' ;^)

 mike
28.183COBRA::DINSMOREMadonna and ASICS.. A WINNING COMBOTue Jun 19 1990 10:294
    mike,
    
    me gots to ask.. 6/20 the lawn.. fill me in?
    
28.184CAM::WAYTerminate with extreme prejudiceTue Jun 19 1990 10:4523
Well, Mike, we did make a distinction between what we called 
Funk (stuff like Brick House by the Commodores and stuff by 
Earth Wind & Fire) and pure Disco (Bee Gees, KC and the Sunshine
Band etc).

Funk was cool, especially if the band had horns.  The Phoenix Horn Section
from Earth Wind and Fire was highly ranked by the brass majors I hung out
with, as was the Tower of Power Horn Section.  Commodores were a hot
commodity.

"Cause she's a brick house, she's mighty mighty, jus' lettin' it all hang
out!"


As far as the Sox last night, Roger had an off night.

BTW, I heard Rich Gale (pitching coach of the New Britain Sox) talking
about really tall pitchers having an advantage based on angle of 
delivery etc.  It was quite informative.  I guess if the pitcher
is tall enough, his delivery is so angled relative to the batter that
it's almost like trying to hit slow pitch softball.....

'Saw
28.185CSC32::J_HERNANDEZIWishCathyIrelandWouldMoonMe!Tue Jun 19 1990 10:471
    Funk?  Frank go home and listen to Van Halen. You'll be ok.
28.186CAM::WAYTerminate with extreme prejudiceTue Jun 19 1990 10:525
Debil Dog -- I do that too!  I just happen to have the *most*
eclectic tastes in music in the Western world.


'Saw
28.187PARVAX::WARDLECounting the cars on the NJ Tpk...Tue Jun 19 1990 11:005
    Frank, you really have to narrow your musical tastes. Funk is Junk. 
    
    Any of you guys see how much Frank sweats? Maybe that explains it.
    
    JoJ
28.188CAM::WAYTerminate with extreme prejudiceTue Jun 19 1990 11:299
Like people, every musical genre has something to offer.

Open yourself to the music.  Expand your stream of consciousness.

Eat some of Chainsaw's Magic Mushrooms, wait for the White Rabbit,
bring a towel in case you sweat, and let it be.


Chainsaw
28.189MCIS1::DHAMELThe killer awoke before dawn...Tue Jun 19 1990 12:3811
    
  >    I just happen to have the *most*
  > eclectic tastes in music in the Western world.
    
    Hey 'Saw, have you been taping all 17 hours of VVagner's "Ring of
    the Niebelungelubblelied" thisted week?  It's simulcasted in stereo,
    too.  It's more filling, and it sounds great too.  A better cure
    for insomnia you won't find anywhere.
    
    Dickster
    
28.190CAM::WAYTerminate with extreme prejudiceTue Jun 19 1990 12:5215
Gee, I almost asked in that reply who'd seen Das Rheingold lasted night.

I haven't been taping it, but wished I'd known about it.  The stories
that are being portrayed are based in some of the neatest mythology
known to man.

People don't know it, but Richard Wagner also wrote a pornographic
opera cycles called the Ring of the Niebelunglabia(tm), which is
very rarely performed...

It's hard to believe that the lush sounds of Wagner's orchestrations
were considered controversial in the world of late 19th century Romantic
music...

'Saw
28.191AXIS::ROBICHAUDMo Money, Mo Money, Mo MoneyTue Jun 19 1990 13:176
28.192MCIS1::DHAMELThe killer awoke before dawn...Tue Jun 19 1990 13:2814
    
    I switched to the opera lasted night after Rocket Roger was getting
    the SLOF(tm) beat out of him.  I can't say I could watch the whole
    freakin' thing right up until the fat lady sings, but VVagner does
    have some stirring overtures.  "Die Valkeries(sp?)" always reminds
    me of either the Bugs Bunny cartoon where Elmer Fudd sings "Kill
    da Wabbit", or that Helicopter scene from the 'Nam movie (Apocolypse
    Now (?).
    
    And how come they sing, like, 68 bars of music in German, and the
    subtitle on the bottom is only about three words?
    
    Dicksterlungelieb
    
28.193DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Tue Jun 19 1990 13:384
    /Don, now there's a beer, good 'ole Red White and Blue.  Is it on
    sale yet?  Works better than Drano.
    
    Lee
28.194Scares the **** out of 'em ...SHALOT::HUNTSend lawyers, guns, and money ...Tue Jun 19 1990 13:557
    >> or that Helicopter scene from the 'Nam movie (Apocolypse Now (?).
    
    "(Sniff, sniff)  Ahhh, I love the smell of napalm in the morning."
    
    	- Robert Duvall as "Colonel Kilgore" in "Apocalypse Now"
    
    Bob Hunt
28.195CAM::WAYHell To PayTue Jun 19 1990 14:0419
"Smells like victory"


The reason is that the German language has this tendency to make
works up out of small words.  Ausgang, which means exit, is really
Out-way, or something like that.

At any rate, German can take up a lot more room than english. (YOu 
should see the word for Factory Automation 8^)).  Add to that the
fact that a lot of the libretto reads like poetry, and you get
the extra stuff.

I wish I had a good command of the language because then I wouldn't
need the subtitles.

The way Roger was pitching last night you've thought it was Twilight
of the Gods anyway....

'Saw
28.196Blues before and afterWNDMLL::SCHNEIDERTakes 2 jerks 2 make 1 MVanilli.Tue Jun 19 1990 16:2910
> was the mound too high last night? perhaps he was getting squezzed?
    
    Well two or three starts ago, when he wasn't impressive, but got the
    win anyway, he blamed it on the 150 pitches or so he threw 6 days
    earlier.  This mornings Globe said that the mound in the bullpen was
    too low, and the one in the field was too high.
    
    Maybe he's saving the squeeze for next time?
    
    Dan
28.197AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampTue Jun 19 1990 16:465
    	Dan, you master of misinformation, Roger did not say any of
    those things.  Pena did.  Roger's only comment was that he pitched
    poorly.
    
    				/Dom
28.198Misinform *this*WNDMLL::SCHNEIDERTakes 2 jerks 2 make 1 MVanilli.Tue Jun 19 1990 17:078
    >This mornings Globe said that the mound in the bullpen was
    >too low, and the one in the field was too high.
    
    Hey /Don, cancha read???  What does the above say?  No misinformation
    there.  BTW, this wasn't quoted from Pena either.  It was obviously fed
    to the writer.  One can only wonder why...
    
    Dan
28.199Who wants to kick the dirt, next?BUILD::MORGANTue Jun 19 1990 18:1510
    >Well two or three starts ago, when he wasn't impressive, but got the
                                   ^^^^ ^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^
    >win anyway, he blamed it on the 150 pitches or so he threw 6 days
    
    Dan, either your information or memory is bogus.  Not counting last
    night, Clemens' ERA in his last 3 starts was 1.96.  The game you're
    talking about, he gave up two runs.  What a shitbum, huh?
    
    					Steve
    
28.200AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampWed Jun 20 1990 10:046
    	RE: Dan
    
    	I'm rubber and you're glue.
    	Everything you say bounces off me and sticks to you.
    
    				/Don
28.201CAM::WAYHell to PayWed Jun 20 1990 10:1523
Yes folks, it'll be here soon....

The all new, all improved, all VHS (we got rid of Beta)

	
	/Don Schoolyard Rhymes, Rivalries and Retorts Video.


In this video, /Don examines that time in our lives when our lack
of inhibitions caused us to be quicker on our feet, quicker with
our fists, and quicker with our wits.

/Don expounds in detail upon the art of the retort, covering in
large part that body of knowledge known as schoolboy illogic.
He also calls in his expert partner Dinsdale to show the latest
pugilistic techniques to help you in your own fisticuffs.  Never mind
what Tyson's doing, ask /Don the expert...

Call, now, and we'll send you free of charge, the informational booklet,
"Schoolyard Scoring - or How to Make it With Beautiful Women!"


Call 1-800-YOR-MAMA
28.202Sox Travel CoachLUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Jun 20 1990 10:2123
    Latest flap from the Red Sox camp has to do with players being upset
    with the travel arrangements the team has set up. Seems that the
    team got hung up at BWI airport after the Orioles game by Customs.
    The Toronto airport closes at 11:00 so they had to fly into Hamilton
    and then take a 50 minute bus ride. Team didn't get into their hotel
    rooms until 4:30 AM yesterday morning. Clemens and Evans walked
    off the plane in Baltimore, spent the night there and flew to Toronto
    yesterday afternoon.
    
    Seems travel was one of the complaints Clemens presented to management
    two years ago. Tony Pena said the Red Sox travel arrangements are
    the worst he's seen. One player claimed that if the Sox don't clean
    up their act on travel, Clemens and Brunansky will leave the team
    when their contracts expire simply for that reason. Kutcher and
    Greenwell were also outspoken about this.
    
    What exactly is wrong with the Sox travel arrangements? My first
    reaction was "Here go the whiners and belly-achers again" but when
    Pena said this was the worst he's seen, I'm thinking perhaps there's
    more here than meets the eye.
    
    Rich
    
28.203cheapskate shoestring owners = lousy travel arrangementsCNTROL::CHILDSDiggin the lawn 6/20 w/ the TWOSWed Jun 20 1990 10:230
28.204Gotta bitch about something, I guessSNDCSL::HAUSRATHToo many projects, not enough timeWed Jun 20 1990 10:497
    
    I don't care how bad the travel arrangments are, when you're making the 
    kind of money these guys do, I really don't think they should complain.
    
    I didn't think these issues surfaced when a team was winning!  
    
    Oh, that's right, it's the Red Sox!  
28.205FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Jun 20 1990 14:1210
    The players really don't have any right to complain on this one.
    Yes, they charter.  In most cases, it's not a problem.  I believe,
    however, there is some sort of flight restriction going into Toronto
    at night.  There is also a time problem in clearing Customs.
    
    The only alternative would have been to stay in Baltimore an extra
    night and fly up Tuesday morning.  Would have probably taken just
    as long at Customs but would have avoided the bus ride.
    
    John
28.206LUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Jun 20 1990 14:265
    Yes, but why is Pena saying the Sox travel arrangements are the
    worst he's seen?
    
    Rich
    
28.207AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampWed Jun 20 1990 14:363
    	Maybe Rico Petrocelli got the team banned from some of the
    airlines.
    				/Don
28.208FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Jun 20 1990 14:5917
    It could be the hotels, there may have been problems with buses
    meeting teams at the planes, it could be the baggage handling, it
    could be the flight times, it could be any number of things.  Some
    of these things are in the control of the team, some are not.
    
    In defense of Jack Rogers (Red Sox Travelling Secretary) team travel
    is a pain in the neck no matter what level it's on.  You are dealing
    with a very fussy clientele and you want things to go perfectly,
    no matter what.
    
    In defense of the players, when you fly as often as they do and
    at such odd hours as they do, little things are very important and
    what may seem to be a minor annoyance to us becomes a big annoyance
    to them.  They work under an awful lot of pressure and it's especially
    difficult after a loss.  I'm not trying to excuse misbehavior, either.
    
    John
28.210CAM::WAYI got a black cat bone, gotta mojo too...Wed Jun 20 1990 16:1723
28.211FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Jun 20 1990 16:3450
    One area where the Red Sox could be criticized is for not sitting
    down with the players before the season and saying, "we have a charter
    going from Baltimore to Toronto after the game.  As you know, flying
    into Toronto is a pain in the neck because we have to go through
    customs, we have no idea how long it will take, if we complain we'll
    get held in Baltimore for 24 hours, we have to fly into Hamilton
    because Toronto's airport closes at 11 and that's an extra hour
    bus ride."  Communicating the source of the problem no matter how
    many times the guys may have heard it before at least covers the
    team.
    
    Travelling with the Patriots gives me some perspective on the problem.
    The team has to arrange for a charter flight from Boston or Providence
    to city X.  The team has to arrange for buses to bring the team
    to the airport and a truck to bring the team's equipment.  If it's
    a two week trip, then the truck also has to handle the personal
    luggage from everyone in the travel party.  The team gets a special
    menu on the plane.  The buses and the equipment truck not only have
    to be able to get to the plane at whatever airport the team is flying
    out of but they damn well better be waiting at the other end.  Hotel
    rooms, meeting rooms and meals have to be arranged at the hotel
    at whatever city the team is playing in.  The personal luggage has
    to be there (with any sport, the preliminary arrangements must be
    made far in advance and with football, someone goes out in advance
    of the team (2-3 days), part of his job is to make sure everything
    is OK on that end, have room keys ready, clear the way at the airport
    and so forth).  Buses have to be ready at the right time to get
    the team to the stadium.  After the game, they have to get the team
    and the gear onto the transportation, get to the airport, onto the
    plane and back home.  Everyone is tired and wound up at the same
    time and pissed off if they lost.
    
    Someone from the airline travels with the team and the hotel and
    bus people bend over backwards to make sure this all goes well.
    Continental handled the Patriots flight needs last year for the
    first time and I was impressed with just how eager they were to
    please on the trip I took with the team.  The person who is in charge
    of the travel is responsible, but a lot of what he's responsible
    for is in the hands of someone else and no matter how prepared he
    is, no matter how many times he checks, something is going to go
    wrong and he is going to get blamed.
    
    In baseball, the players get meal money rather than having big team
    meals, and there's always personal luggage to contend with.  Baseball
    teams tend to fly at more odd hours than football teams and I think
    baseball players are much less gentlemanly.  I've travelled with
    the Patriots on 3 road trips and have never seen them give anyone
    a hard time.
    
    John
28.212WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his Lips...Know New Taxes!!Wed Jun 20 1990 19:472
       What's wif all the 'hidden' notes? Is Crunchster back?!!
                                            Denny
28.213Tsk, tsk, tsk :^>WFOV11::MORRISONA Haney physique...Mr HaneyThu Jun 21 1990 10:465
    
    Frank, you naughty boy!! You musta said a no-no.
    
    Bull~
    
28.214MCIS1::DHAMELThong salesmen are crack dealersThu Jun 21 1990 15:3329
    
    Are these Sox predictable or what?  A chance to move into first
    place lasted night, and "when the going gets tough, the tough get
    going--in reverse."
    
    Pinning their hopes on future Hall-of-Famer Wes Gardner (1-4 record,
    ERA left out intentionally to preserve disk space), the loyal Sox
    fans went scurrying for the "Fold File" before the evening was through.
    
    Next victim, Jeff Gray, who had turned grey by the time he finished
    his embarrassment, went 1 1/3 innings, giving up 3 runs on three
    hits.
    
    Then came fireballer Tom Bolton, who turned into "Furballer" Tom
    Bolton, and choked most heinously while coughing up 1 inning of
    6-hit, 5-run ball.
    
    Does anyone out there know anyone who can throw a ball 60' 6" (in
    the air, that is), and looks good in tight baseball pants?  I know
    where we might be able to get him (or her) a cushy job for $600K
    per year.
    
    By the way, I read that Toronto had some kind of broken water main
    problem in and around Skydome lasted night.  Those baffroom olympics
    must have been wicked awesome!
    
    Dickster
    
    
28.215LUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceThu Jun 21 1990 16:2624
    Hey Dickster, what's your problem? Wes Gardner's ERA is 6.28. Better
    than the +7.** of a certain Yankee starter. 
    
    And Jeff Gray is a closer. He retired the first 4 batters he faced.
    Bolton is another story, in my opinion, and deserves to be lambasted.
    
    The Sox are not expecting great things from Gardner. But he got
    the Sox into the 6th inning only down by 3 runs. Against what many
    people feel is the 2nd best team in the American League, this ain't
    as bad as you make it seem.
    
    Gray is a 1 inning pitcher. He has said it and Fischer says it.
    Perhaps Morgan deserves some heat for leaving him in. To be honest
    I expected Lamp to come in.
    
    But I am looking on the bright side. The Sox went to New York,
    baltimore and Toronto and were trailing by 1 1/2 games when they
    left. They come home with a 5-4 record and are out by 2 games. They
    split an away series with the Jays. Nobody said the Sox are the
    class of the East. I think they are doing better than many expected.
    As are the Tigers.
    
    Rich
    
28.216COBRA::DINSMOREMadonna and ASICS.. A WINNING COMBOThu Jun 21 1990 16:542
brrrrr.. cold in here :)
    
28.217Bolton saves the day! Film in the canAKOV06::DCARRJordan Rules! (thx Chuck!)Thu Jun 21 1990 17:4610
    Ya wanna know the funniest?  The Barely Heard this morning reported
    that Bolton came in and "saved the bullpen"....   Now, I'm optomistic,
    but even _I_ couldn't write that wiffout gaggin'.
    
    Speaking of baffroom Olympics, I'll be there tomorrow night with about
    20 friends (hold yer keyboard, Nazz :-), and I'm sure we'll consume the
    minimum required for entry into the 100 yd crawl...  but excatly which
    baffroom is it, and when are the post times?
    
    ML
28.218WHAT DO THE SOX SEE IN TOM BOLTONROULET::GARRYCowboys in 91Fri Jun 22 1990 03:0012
    Can someone please tell me what Tom Bolton is doing with the Sox,
    this guy has great credentials in the minors and has NEVER,I repeat
    NEVER shown that he can get a major leaguer out when it counts,how
    is he still in the Boston organization after all his piss poor
    appearances,I don't care if he strikes out 100 guys in a row at
    Pawtucket but everytime they say he's ready he's like kerosene on
    a fire.....he's USELESS.He must have knee pads that don't wear out
    or something because he's certainly not here with his so called
    pitching talent.
    
    
    Tom
28.2198^)CAM::WAYCould Mighty Mouse take Superman?Fri Jun 22 1990 10:551
HE IS NO TWO BLAM U OUR
28.220LUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceFri Jun 22 1990 11:0019
    First off Bolton is a lefty. Lefties tend to get more attention
    and are forgiven more frequently than righties.
    
    Secondly, when Dopson went down for good, Morgan called Pawtucket
    and asked them what they had for pitching. He was told that Bolton
    was the best they had. 
    
    Like you said, a successful AAA pitcher is not necessarily a good
    major leaguer (witness Jeff Gray as a closer or Dana Kiecker) but
    you have to go with what your minor league manager says sometimes.
    
    Seems as though the best prospects the Sox have are not in Pawtucket
    but at New Britain. I would expect a few of the AA Sox to get a
    long look see next year at spring training and perhaps 1 will come
    north with the big team. One or two others will probably end up
    with Pawtucket with guys like Liester getting their walking papers.
    
    Rich
    
28.221MILKWY::SLABOUNTYErotic NightmaresFri Jun 22 1990 12:199
    
    	Does anyone know what happened to the RED_SOX conference?
    
    	Is it still on HARBOR?  I'm getting "File not found".
    
    	Thanks for any info.
    
    							GTI
    
28.222WMOIS::JBARROWSIf you can't be good.....have fun!Fri Jun 22 1990 12:221
    Try SHPLOG::RED_SOX
28.223same problemEARRTH::GROVESFri Jun 22 1990 12:253
     re: -1
    
       Just  tried SHPLOG::RED_SOX and got "File Not Found"
28.224WMOIS::JBARROWSIf you can't be good.....have fun!Fri Jun 22 1990 12:272
    Sorry, it was working on a couple of days ago when I last checked,
    maybe someone else knows something.....
28.225Info on Sox ConferenceAUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Fri Jun 22 1990 13:0913
              <<< ASABET::ASAB11:[NOTES$LIBRARY]BASEBALL.NOTE;2 >>>
                                 -< BASEBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 27.221                  The Boston Red Sox note                  221 of 225
VAXWRK::NEEDLE "Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!""   6 lines  21-JUN-1990 10:55
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The satellite that houses the RED_SOX notes file went away according to Bill
Jackson (HARBOR::).  The file is in the process of moving.

I'll let you know when it's back if Bill lets me know.

j.
    
28.226See note 136 in ASABET::BASEBALL for further info.VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Fri Jun 22 1990 16:240
28.227Sox sweep O's...CRBOSS::DERRYLandOfTheFreeButOnlyIfYouAgree....Mon Jun 25 1990 09:051
    
28.228Sox Sad Slump Continues. Slip To Second In Standings.AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampTue Jul 17 1990 12:091
    
28.229Or did you mean "sipped"MCIS1::DHAMELGimme a warm woman and a cold beerTue Jul 17 1990 12:257
    
    >          -< Sox Sad Slump Continues.  Slip To Second In Standings. >-

    Right.  And the Hindenburg just "slipped" off its moorings.
    
    Dickster
    
28.230Dickster's Dastardly Diabribes Demean DeadSoxAXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampTue Jul 17 1990 12:451
    
28.231Slashers silly snippets sip strained swampwater succulently15436::LEFEBVREShe had one long pair of eyesTue Jul 17 1990 14:002
     
    
28.232RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe Morgan Goodwill Games...Tue Jul 17 1990 14:053
    What did Marty Barrett say?
    
    JD
28.233Weinie's wise wemarks wotAXIS::ROBICHAUDYanksInLast-/DonDrinksFreeTue Jul 17 1990 14:071
    
28.234AXIS::ROBICHAUDYanksInLast-/DonDrinksFreeTue Jul 17 1990 14:176
	RE: JD

	Marty was moaning about Morgan's Barrett benching.  Incredulously
crying foul and favoritism.

				/Don
28.235FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Jul 17 1990 15:0214
    He said he felt and many other players allegedly agree with him that
    the Sox strongest lineup had him at second and Reed at short.  He said
    also that Reed felt he should be playing second rather than
    flip-flopping positions and that if management felt Reed should
    flip-flop, Reed should do what's best for the team.  Reed said he never
    said he wouldn't play shortstop but did say he'd prefer to play only
    one position.  Reading between the lines of Barrett's quotes, it seemed
    like he was unwilling to accept there is a difference between
    management and labor.
    
    That sort of sums it up.  More current discussion in the Red Sox notes
    conference.
    
    John
28.236COBRA::DINSMOREsox fading.. and fastWed Jul 18 1990 15:556
    clemens +  tired arm=  no 20 game  season
                                             
    
    
    film a t 11
    
28.237MCIS1::DHAMELGimme a warm woman and a cold beerWed Jul 18 1990 16:1011
    
    'Bout time we're back on line.
    
    Red Sox haven't won a World Series since 1918, but *NO* team, until
    the Sox did it last night, has *ever* hit into two triple plays
    in one game.  
    
    Way to go Sox!!  Congrats!!  You make my pants swell with pride!!
    
    Dickster
    
28.238BSS::RIGGENCo Sports teams= BridesmaidsWed Jul 18 1990 16:154
    Sorry bout the down time (complain to the Customer Svc's group)
    Couldn't get my TU81 fixed. 
    
    Jeff
28.239WMOIS::JBARROWSI get so excitableWed Jul 18 1990 16:1610
    Dinz,
    
    Why don't ya quit pickin' on poor Roger for 1 minute.
    
    The last few games the Sox were merely emulating the Yanks
    but finally, some desperate fan gave them some smelling salts
    and woke 'em up.  The results were clearly evident in last
    nights game..................
    
    Wheel
28.240COBRA::DINSMOREsox fading.. and fastWed Jul 18 1990 16:245
    yea right 1-0.. big run support, wheel, be nice to me, i am going
    through a crisis, my daughters voice is changing!!!!!!!!
    
    shitttttttttttttttt
    
28.241WMOIS::JBARROWSWanted: Man in velcro pants!Wed Jul 18 1990 16:303
    Be nice to you?
    NEVER!!!!
    
28.242ha ha DInz! :-)SASE::SZABOThe Blues kicked me in the headWed Jul 18 1990 16:331
    
28.243MCIS1::DHAMELGimme a warm woman and a cold beerWed Jul 18 1990 16:3410
    
    >   Sorry bout the down time (complain to the Customer Svc's group)

    No reason to apologize.  Youse moderators and technoweenies and
    other techno-support guys and gals have my utmost respect and support.
    
    I'm swelling with pride over you too.
    
    Dickster
    
28.244MCIS1::DHAMELGimme a warm woman and a cold beerWed Jul 18 1990 16:398
    
    >>< Note 28.241 by WMOIS::JBARROWS "Wanted: Man in velcro pants!" >
                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    See Lufay.  I think velour pants come with velcro.
    
    Dickster
    
28.245WMOIS::JBARROWSWanted: Man in velcro pants!Wed Jul 18 1990 16:435
    Nah, velour and velcro don't stick together.......
    
    Thanks for da help!!!
    
    Wheel
28.246Hey Dinz, you wouldn't want to wager on Roger winning 20?AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampWed Jul 18 1990 17:011
    
28.247WMOIS::JBARROWSWanted: Man in velcro pants!Wed Jul 18 1990 17:045
    You think he's gonna put his money where his mouth is????
    
    ya know Dinz, ya can't back down from a dare, its not a *manly*
    thing to do.....
    
28.248put your spokes back on WHEELCOBRA::DINSMOREsox fading.. and fastWed Jul 18 1990 17:061
    
28.249CAM::WAYand I didn't draw the card I neededWed Jul 18 1990 17:247
Dinz, just remember, the better part of valor is discretion.

And Dickster, you'd better put some ice on that wang, er, thang of
yours to keep the swelling down.  Even swelling wif pride can
be dangerous if it swells too much!

'Saw
28.250WMOIS::JBARROWSWanted: Man in velcro pants!Wed Jul 18 1990 17:332
    Yeah, if it swells too much it'll pop and there won't be anything
    left!!!!!
28.251AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampWed Jul 18 1990 17:364
    	5-4-3, 5-4-3 double triple.  I wonder if anyone will play those
    numbers in some twin-trifecta action tonight?
    
    				/Don
28.252CAM::WAYand I didn't draw the card I neededWed Jul 18 1990 17:429
28.253COBRA::DINSMOREsox fading.. and fastWed Jul 18 1990 17:503
    
    tplay the 6-9 quinela  frankwa
    
28.254Sizzling Sox Surge in StandingsAXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampThu Jul 19 1990 09:361
    
28.255awesome hitting machine red sox luck outCOBRA::DINSMOREthe Sex Trigger gene..Thu Jul 19 1990 09:471
    
28.256Record setting Red Sox Roolll!AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampThu Jul 19 1990 10:051
    
28.257CAM::WAYFor I intend to go in harm's wayThu Jul 19 1990 11:051
Yankees mired in Steinbrenner's Scandal...
28.258Parade pin PoctoberHILLST::BENCHGeorge Keverian for Ultra-Thick-FastThu Jul 19 1990 11:077
28.259COBRA::DINSMOREthe Sex Trigger gene..Tue Jul 24 1990 09:4213
    Knudson missed the extra point last night in the sox game.. it went wide
    
    left... 13-0.. boddicker is coming back to earth after a strong
    start, A deal for  Scott  is close but they want  Naering.
    
    Mac,
    
    whats wrong with this team??
    
    
    
    dinz
    
28.260WMOIS::JBARROWSToo much is never enoughTue Jul 24 1990 10:046
    What's wrong with the Sox???
    
    
    THEY GOT YANKEE-ITIS!!!!!!!!!
    
    Wheel
28.261COBRA::DINSMOREthe Sex Trigger gene..Tue Jul 24 1990 10:167
    THEY WILL BE IN 4TH, WHENS THE SEASONS OVER...
    
    meaning the red_sox
    
    
    dinz
    
28.262STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Jul 24 1990 11:546
    It's too early to write them off entirely, but if Boddicker doesn't
    regain his first half form pretty soon the Sox are toast.  This
    morning's Globe reports that Mike has a 7.36 ERA since July 7th.
    
    
    py
28.263snubbed for a good reasonCNTROL::CHILDSand so castles made of sand...Tue Jul 24 1990 12:109
>    It's too early to write them off entirely, but if Boddicker doesn't
>    regain his first half form pretty soon the Sox are toast.  This
>    morning's Globe reports that Mike has a 7.36 ERA since July 7th.
    
 
 Proves Tony Larussa was right....

 mike
28.264COBRA::DINSMOREthe Sex Trigger gene..Tue Jul 24 1990 12:122
    they cant seem to hit  either..... must be the moon in leo...
    
28.265WMOIS::JBARROWSToo much is never enoughTue Jul 24 1990 12:259
    o The Sox are merely losing all the games now at this point of the
      season so when they make it to the World Series, they'll win.
    
    o Wait till Dewey gets back....
    
    And Dinz, if its the moon in Leo what is it with the Yanks, the year
    in 1990???????   Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha (tm)
    
    Wheel
28.266COBRA::DINSMOREthe Sex Trigger gene..Tue Jul 24 1990 12:362
    set marker  28.265   ha
    
28.267WMOIS::JBARROWSToo much is never enoughTue Jul 24 1990 12:4311
    Well if ya think I am a dreamer listen to this comment made by my
    mother last night:
    
    'Wouldn't it be nice if the Red Sox, Celtics, Patriots (she's really
    joking on this one) and Bruins all won this year?'
    
    Maybe I should have put this in the Sports Joke Topic????
    
    BTW, Sox are gonna take off soon, TRUST ME!
    
    Wheel
28.268COBRA::DINSMOREthe Sex Trigger gene..Tue Jul 24 1990 12:516
    
    ya, they are taking off on that plane that will lead them into 4th
    
    place....
    
    
28.269WMOIS::JBARROWSToo much is never enoughTue Jul 24 1990 12:584
    okay, okay arguing with you is a moot point, even if da Sox finish
    fourth (which they won't) at least it is better than LAST! HA!
    
    Wheel
28.270COBRA::DINSMOREthe Sex Trigger gene..Tue Jul 24 1990 12:593
    
    whos arguing, i just happen to disagree with ya wheel kid..
    
28.271WMOIS::JBARROWSToo much is never enoughTue Jul 24 1990 13:028
    Okay OLD man Dinz!!!!! hahaha
    
    Sox are gonna come alive, I'm tellin' ya now......wait and see!
    Saw Dewey lasted night on da news and he's starting to practice.
    
    Better start putting your money away for that case you owe /Don!
    
    Wheel
28.272Another Clemens victory?CSC32::P_PAPACEKWed Jul 25 1990 19:084
    
    Anybody got a score on this afternoon's game vs the Brewers?
    
    
28.273FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Jul 25 1990 20:383
    Sox 2 Brewers 0, Clemens complete game, 9 Ks, 1 BB, 3 hits.
    
    John
28.274Sox REAL Problem37141::PSHAFERVulture CapitalistThu Jul 26 1990 01:576
    Wheel,
    
    	The Sox only problem is that they are in the same division as the
    Orioles and Blue Jays.
    
    PaulaSue
28.275I can't believe they're in 1st!CRUISE::JBONINJohn Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBAThu Jul 26 1990 11:057
    How can a team lose 15 out of 21 games and be tied for 1st place!!??
    
    
    
    
    
    John
28.276What a stiff huh?SALEM::DODAGonna be a dad!Thu Jul 26 1990 11:557
Clemens is a bum.

Right Dinz?

daryll

28.277STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Jul 26 1990 12:009
    re Daryll, personal name:
    
    You too?  Congrats!  Alison and I just found out a couple days ago 
    that we'll be parents for the first time in the spring (probably around
    Opening Day next year).  
    
    
    Best of luck,
    Paul
28.278psst!15436::LEFEBVREYour time is gonna comeThu Jul 26 1990 12:064
    Somebody want to ask Dinz what Clemens record would be if the Red
    Sox had a closer?
    
    Mark.
28.279Due Jan 25th!SALEM::DODAGonna be a dad!Thu Jul 26 1990 12:070
28.28015436::LEFEBVREYour time is gonna comeThu Jul 26 1990 12:093
    Hey Daryll, how 'bout dat Mike Boddicker!
    
    Mark.
28.281How about that Chris James?SALEM::DODAGonna be a dad!Thu Jul 26 1990 12:173
Still gotta go some to get into Allan Anderson territory...

daryll 
28.282probably 8 or 9 losses by now for Mr. CrybabyCNTROL::CHILDSand so castles made of sand...Thu Jul 26 1990 12:5410
>    Somebody want to ask Dinz what Clemens record would be if the Red
>    Sox had a closer?
    
    Mark.


 Or what it would be if Dinz had left well enough alone? ;^)

mike
28.283My sage advice to you potential Dads....CAM::WAYShot down, in a blaze of gloryThu Jul 26 1990 13:1130
Hey, all you Dads-to-be...

Congratulations.  I guess there weren't any (closed) flies on you!


But, gentlemen, remember.  Your part of the deal only took a couple
of minutes.  Your lady's part of the deal will take considerably
longer, and will get her more testy than you could ever imagine.

So, on those evenings when you come home and she greets you at the
door with a butcher knife and that Charles Manson look in her
eyes, demanding Ben 'n Jerry's Heathbar Crunch something in Vlasic
Pickles and topped with peanut butter, just go out and get her some.
Keep in mind the little bundle of joy that will be arriving, and
that will make you smile.

Also, pick a good name for the kid.  Names like Dewdrop, Leaf, Autumn,
Star, are so dweeby now.  If it's a boy, make sure the name is
a manly one.  Something like Joe, Mack, Bubba, or Biff is gonna strike
fear in the hearts of the other kids when he gets to be in 3rd grade.


Finally, don't forget to teach your kid about the important things
in life:  good nutrition, good beer, good sportsmanship, respect,
love, safe sex, Jack Daniels, and about never, never putting coat
hangers into live electrical outlets.


Hope this has shlepped,
Chainsaw (who hasn't had any, and probably wont' for a while....)
28.284Knuckles is a good name, too!4159::NAZZAROUnderneath the strobe lightThu Jul 26 1990 15:3710
    Saw -
    
    Your manly names were good, but I'm partial to Vito, Nunzio, Guido,
    etc, you know, those fine ethnic names that are not an indication
    of any particular nationality but project a certain "if you don't
    give me your lunch money I'll make you throw up quicker than you
    thought humanly possible" kind of image that will hold your child
    in good company for his formative years.
    
    NAZZ
28.285MSBVLS::REPROFri Jul 27 1990 10:453
    clemens  is a average picture, i have to agree with Dinz
    
    
28.28615436::LEFEBVREYour time is gonna comeFri Jul 27 1990 11:0810
    < Note 28.285 by MSBVLS::REPRO >


>    clemens  is a average picture, i have to agree with Dinz

    He might be a_average picture, but he's a superlative 8x10 glossy.
    
    HTH,
    
    Mark.
28.287Caint fool me Dinswad.JACKAL::DIGGINSMe and Elvis went to McDonald'sFri Jul 27 1990 15:157
    
    Dinz u using Ruthies account? You bumski!
    
    
    
    
    Steve_who_knows_better
28.288No wonder players pack up and move ...FRSBEE::BROOKSI could drop Tyson like a bad habit!Fri Jul 27 1990 22:008
    And after Clemens great performance, what dominated the sports page of
    the Hearld ?
    
    You got it, a petulant bashing session by some writer who was p.o.ed
    that Roger didn't inform the press that he wouldn't hold forth and kiss
    their a** .....
    
    Just another reason to despise the Boston media.
28.289REFINE::ASHEWouldUwalkONyourLIPSthruBUSTEDglass?Sat Jul 28 1990 14:021
    Who did they give up for Marshall?
28.290Only in the AL East.CRBOSS::DERRYCooler than a Fridgidaire...Mon Jul 30 1990 08:524
    Sox go 4-8 on this road trip and find themselves only a game back.
    Unreal.
    
    
28.291No one want's it.JOULE::DIGGINSMe and Elvis went to McDonald'sMon Jul 30 1990 10:278
    
    I think they picked Marshall up for nada. Not sure tho'.
    The Herald is a rag. Is the AL East still the AL least?
    
    
    
    
    Steve
28.292CNTROL::CHILDSand so castles made of sand...Mon Jul 30 1990 14:2421
 They gave up two or three minor leaguers for Marshall. Why? He's always
 been hurt. They certainly can't take Qunitana out of the lineup at first.
 Maybe they can play him in right but they just traded for Brunasky to that
 and if they DH him what's Evans going to say? The Soap Opera continue...

 Worcester writer Phil Oneil has suggest that trade Clemens now before they
 loose him. Makes sense to me. IMO the writers have a right to be pissed
 off at Roger. They wait an hour for him and then he sends word down that he
 isn't going to talk to them anyways. He could hace told them that in the
 first five minutes after the ballgame and all because the week before they
 report about him getting elbowed iced after two week before he's complaining
 about a heavy arm? The guy is a first class jerk and probably the biggest
 crybaby to ever play in Boston and that's saying a lot.....

 for the record Boggs is hitting 291  ;^)....

 Mac thanks for Gooden comments a while back, he's won 8 straight since
 then.... ;^)

mike 
28.293LUDWIG::GARRYCowboys in 91Mon Jul 30 1990 14:347
    RE. -1   Clemens
    
    Mike and you'd still love to have him on your beloved Indians.
    
    
    
    Tom
28.294New AL recordCIM::BROWNMon Jul 30 1990 15:087
    
    Sox blast Tiger pitching for 18 hits including a new record 12
    doubles.  Broke the old Tiger record of 11 doubles in a game.
    
    Sox and Tigers split the series 2 - 2.
    
    \pjb
28.295CNTROL::CHILDSand so castles made of sand...Mon Jul 30 1990 15:137
 Tom, you couldn't be more wrong. I'd rather have a team that gets along
 than pampered, whinny stars who still loose. Of course I'm not an owner
 trying to make bucks. If the Indians or Mets traded for Clemens, I'd root
 for other teams....

 mike 
28.296AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Mon Jul 30 1990 15:3610
28.297ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Jul 30 1990 15:493
    
    Don't trade Clemens... please...  I'd rather see the Sox lose him
    to free agency for a 1st round draft pick.
28.298back at yaCNTROL::CHILDSand so castles made of sand...Mon Jul 30 1990 16:4532
>    I thought everyone knew that Roger wasn't talking to the press
>    anymore.  Why did a reporter wait around for an hour?
 
 week to week thing up here Mac. If he wins and he's in a good mood he talks.
 if he looses forget it. if they print something bad about him forget it.
    
    
>    With Darryl Strawberry in the outfield, how do you manage to be a Mets'
>    fan?  


 Well Darryl has had his mouments they seem to be few and far between now that
 Davey is gone. Also I guess the fact that I don't read a lot of NY newspapers
 or hear NY sportsnews I may miss the day to day trials and trivulations
 of Darryl so I'm able to remain a fan. Here everyday it seems like King Roger
 has something else to say, some new ax to grind or some new excuse for his
 performance. Also again I'm not the owner if I was I trade Darryl.

>    And as far as "still loose", since Clemens arrived the Sox have 2
>    division titles and a pennant.  Add to that a few All Star team
>    selections, an MVP, and 2 Cy Youngs.

 Nice indivdual awards there but it seems to me that their two division titles
 and pennant were won inspite of Roger and not because of him. His best years
 they did squittly. Last year during the pennant race of August he was lost in
 a six game loosing streak if I remember correctly. He certainly did well
 against the A's last year in the league championship series didn't he?

 What's his post season record? 

mike
28.299AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Mon Jul 30 1990 17:106
    Sox won the pennant in spite of Roger Clemens?  What in the world were
    all of those sportswriters thinking of when they voted him the MVP that
    year?
    
    And to those who still contend that Roger can't pitch in the clutch, I
    ask that you look at the Rocket's record after a Sox loss.
28.300EARRTH::BROOKSRubItUp/FlipIt/SlapItDown/OhNoooo!Mon Jul 30 1990 17:4419
    re .297
    
    Gronowski, you're mad because Swindell is sipping gallons of pond-scum 
    this year ....
    
    re Roger,
    
    The media makes him The King, and last time I looked, all a player is
    paid to do is play. Period. Not put up with small-minded, petualnt,
    ego-tripping idiots who when *THEY* decide to have a temper tantrum,
    trash you over the papers for years.
    
    They ran Steve Carlton into seclusion, George Hendrick as well. I'd
    like to see some of these noters take the Boston media's garbage as
    well. 
    
    Given the long list of Boston players who have had bellicose relations
    with writers, I have to believe that the players are not most of the
    problem, IMO.
28.301ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Jul 30 1990 18:049
    
    The Indians have not lost in Swindell's last 9 starts... he's gone
    4-0 or 5-0 with a bunch of no decision's and a 2.7? ERA...  he
    might sip... but he doesn't guzzle like the Astros or any other
    teams you might currently be riding on...
    
    Get a life pal... you told me you were going to destroy me in a
    rotis league this year... what's your excuse?
    
28.302RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOA Zorro snap in the Z formation!Mon Jul 30 1990 18:2214
    Big Mac,
    
    IMO, Clemens winnig the MVP was a joke, and he won it for the noteriety
    of 'no one has ever done it before'.   And, in the World Series
    when they needed him, he sipped, and he did in the champeenship
    series.  Roger is a great individual, but he'll never be a team
    leader or a team player.  Because of that, the only way Rogerwill
    ever get a champeenship ring is if he goes to a team and is carried
    along by real team players.
    
    He's a great pitcher, but IMO, he's one of the most, if not THE
    most, overrated player in baseball.  
    
    jD
28.303another brainedwashed RoggeretteCNTROL::CHILDSand so castles made of sand...Mon Jul 30 1990 18:3612
 Mac, if the team is 30 games out and Clemems wins after a loosing streak
 how in the world does prove he can pitch in the clutch? Now I know the
 Soxs haven't been 30 out for a long time but I think you can see my point.

 I think JD stated the MVP pretty well as for my own belief, I don't care if
 a pitcher goes 30-3 with 340 strikeouts there is no how no way he deserves
 to be MVP when he doesn't play everyday or in this case even bat. Even if
 an NL pitcher had that kind of record and even hit a few game winners for
 himself, I'd have hard time buying it....

 mike 
28.304SALEM::DODACapone,Floyd,MassPoliticiansTue Jul 31 1990 11:205
Clemens shuts out Chisox. Sox win 3-0 and keep pace with Jays.

Clemens unscored upon in 23 consecutive innings.

daryll
28.305I guess i got a KOD too...CNTROL::CHILDSand so castles made of sand...Tue Jul 31 1990 11:234
 Anyone still doubt the power of the KOD?  ;^)....

 mike
28.306The workhorseBUILD::MORGANTue Jul 31 1990 11:3213
    The bum threw another shutout last night, making it 23 consecutive
    scoreless innings.  I agree with DrM.  The Boston press is worse than a
    tub full of piranhas.  
    
    Mike C. - would you say Ted Williams was a bum too?  He was labelled
    a head case himself by the Boston media.
    
    Personally, I'd just as soon see Clemens pull a Steve Carlton.  I don't
    care if he says another word, as long as he gets along with his teammates, 
    and continues to pitch the way he has for the past five years.
    
    					Steve
                         
28.307CNTROL::CHILDSand so castles made of sand...Tue Jul 31 1990 11:4827
    
>    Mike C. - would you say Ted Williams was a bum too?  He was labelled
>    a head case himself by the Boston media.
 
 Tough for me to say Steve because I wasn't quite old enough to read all
 about the on goings of ted Williams during his time. While I agree the 
 boston press isn't the greatest and loves to attack I still think Clemens
 has brought alot of it on himself.

 One day he talks then he doesn't and it's always related to his pitching 
 effort.

 The main reasons I consider him a bum are these, if and when he looses he
 always has an excuse and has gone as low as to blame his teamates at time.
 He blasted managment (sure they deserve it) but they do bend over backwards
 for him. He blasts the city but most of all my biggest beef is have you
 ever seen this guy do any charity work around here? Anything for the kids
 who idolize him?

 I just don't happen to believe he is the best pitcher in baseball either
 for which I take most of this crap.

 Ted Williams may have been a headcase but I don't believe he was wishy washy
 with his dealing with the press and atleast he has return something to the
 community....

mike
28.308TOPDWN::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Tue Jul 31 1990 11:4923
I don't think that a dominant year by a pitcher is, by itself enough to warrant
consideration for the mvp. However, when a pitcher has a dominant year and leads
his team to the series I think they should get MVP consideration. 

Clemens did nothing else but lead the Sox to the series in '86. Especially 
when he was coming off major surgery and not expected to do much. 

IMHO...I don't care whether Clemens ever talks to the media again. All I want to
see is him on the mound every 5th day and in a Sox uniform for the rest of his
career. IMNSHO he should be the top payed pitcher in baseball and amongst the 
top payed players in the game. Granted he didn't have a great series in '86 but
his contributions over his career in a hitters park mark him as one of the
best in the game.

Fortunately the pitching position in baseball is one where you can afford to 
have an ego because you rely on yourself more than anybody. I've been the first
to jump on Boggs because of what I deem his selfish hitting style. This I feel 
does not benefit the team. However Clemens is payed to go to the mound and 
get people out. He does it, he does it well and that is all that matters....


Metz
28.309It's the media not Roger..MPO::GILBERTToo much month at the end of the moneyTue Jul 31 1990 16:0141
    
    	I took my 11 year old son to the ball game last night. It wasn't
    the first time he'ld been but I think it's the first time he really
    understood what was going on and appreciated the game. We go to
    Pawtucket fairly often and most of you who have been to McCoy know
    that it's fairly easy to get autographs and talk to the players.
    Well my son couldn't understand why it would be any different at
    Fenway (forgive him, I tried to explain about the lunkheads who
    play ball here) so after the game I took him to the players gate
    and we stood there and watched the players drive out. Some of the
    White Sox players weren't taking the bus to the hotel and they walked
    out and signed autographs and talked to us for a while(Sammy Sosa
    is a real nice guy - Steve Lyons is wierd but he was great with
    my son). The rest of this little tale has two parts to it. Both
    are exactly what I saw and heard but each shows different sides
    of Roger Clemens. 
    	Now all the time we were standing around the gate to the players
    lot was open. Jody Reed stood at the gate and talked to folks for
    awhile but refused to sign autographs. Not one of the Red Sox players
    took the time to stop and sign. There were maybe 15-20 people there
    most of them kids. About 45 minutes after the game most of these
    people started to filter away. There were now maybe 7 or 8 people
    there. All of a sudden one of the clubhouse kids comes through the
    lot carrying two enormous suitcases (This kid was about 6 foot tall
    and 200 lbs and he was really struggling). He placed them in Roger's
    car. The security guards closed the gate. Roger, without any yelling
    or screaming from the folks who were left came over, opened the
    gate and signed autographs and talked to us for about fifteen minutes.
    What I noticed was security guards and clubhouse employees doing
    things for Clemens they didn't do for anyone else. I also found
    a nice guy who was willing to give a few minutes after a hard days
    work to a few kids who waited just to get a glimpse of any player.
    
                       
    One other rather funny point, When Roger finished signing and was
    starting back towards his car there was one other car in the lot.
    One of the little girls who was standing there asked whose it was.
    Roger said " I'm the last player to leave tonight. That's Lou Gorman's
    car. He's probably on the phone."
    
28.310GOOBER::ROSSRALLY timeTue Jul 31 1990 16:1119
That Roger Clemens.. what an overrated, egotistical, self-centered,
kid-hating, park-effected, late-season-losing, SOB.   Where can we
get 4 more like him?

I watched the Sox-Sox game last night on WGN from the 6th inning on
and at the end I said to my wife, "I can't understand where people
get the idea that Roger is not a team player.  Same for Boggs, too."

After Jody Reed made a nice play to end a late inning, Clemens waited
for him to give him a handshake.     And whenever anybody hits a home
run, Boggs is nearly always the first guy up in the dugout to greet 
him.

These guys may have large egos, but they are arguably the best at 
what they do.  We have no idea what they go through on a day-to-day
basis.   

I hope Roger continues to excel and at the same time screw with the
local press.  They deserve everything they get.
28.311Have you shread the Globe today?GOOBER::ROSSRALLY timeTue Jul 31 1990 16:1613
Anyone catch the latest feud between the McDonoughs and the (Mc)Barretts?

Apparently, Will McDonough had been trashing Barrett in the Globe recently,
so Marty happened to bring the subject up with Sean McDonough {the Sox
TV announcer}.  A heated exchange took place and was reported in the Herald.
Will's next two columns in the Globe each had strong anti-Barrett "stories."

I think Will's losing it.  He came out with a big scoop about Dwight Evans
retiring because his back was so bad and how he didn't want to wait until
the end of the season.  Guess who was in the lineup last night?   And when
another Globe reporter quoted Evans as saying he had no intention of retiring
{without mentioning McDonough}, Will came back a couple days later with a 
story about how surprised Red Sox management was that Dewey wasn't retiring.
28.312CAM::WAYHeave to, and prepare to be boarded!Tue Jul 31 1990 17:5421
Steve Lyons is definitely one of baseball's characters.  

I used to talk with him when he was on the AA New Britain Red Sox.
He *always* took time to talk with anyone and everyone after the game.
He'd answer questions that must have sounded dumb to someone playing ball
for a living, and he always did it with great and style.

He may never make the HoF, but he's given me some memories that will be
passed on to any grandchildren I may have with a smile and a laugh
at the fun part of baseball.

Just as I'll always remember Pudge Fisk for his retort when, because
the Sox were short of third basemen, Pudge went in at third.  My
buddy yelled out "So, Pudge, when was the last time you played third?"

Without missing a beat, Pudge yelled back up "Little league"...

I believe it's little things like that which you remember about baseball,
and are truly important parts of our National Pastime....

'Saw
28.313SASE::SZABOGot nothing but hell to pay.Tue Jul 31 1990 18:177
    re:  Steve Lyons
    
    The older kids have affectionately labeled my son "Psycho" recently.
    No, he didn't pull down his pants like Lyons, but if you knew this kid,
    you'd know why.....  :-)
    
    Hawk
28.314QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Jul 31 1990 18:328
   A regular chip off the old blockhead, hey Hawk?

   Heh, heh, heh,
   Couldn't resist

   Mike JN

   PS -  No offense intended to blockheads in general, or in particular.
28.315SASE::SZABOGot nothing but hell to pay.Tue Jul 31 1990 18:448
    Ha!  yeah, everyone refers back to me when they see my kid and learns
    of his new name.....  :-)
    
    BOSTON RED SOX is this note so, what do you fans think of this new kid
    just brought up a couple weeks ago.  Is he going to stay on as a
    regular for many seasons to come?
    
    Hawk
28.316Tax, Title, Dealer Prep not included....CAM::WAYNelson ExpectsTue Jul 31 1990 18:4913
Hawk, we're glad to see that you are carrying on the freakin Lunatic
tradition with the fruit of your loins.

This new kid...would that be Naehring or whatever his name is?  Haven't
seen enough of him to know.  So making a prediction would not be
prudent at this juncture.


This not was not intended to be offensive to freakinlunatics, fruits,
or loins, nor should it be constrewn as a commitment on my part to
predict anything concerns Red Sox players in the future.

'Saw
28.317And Pete Rose is his favorite playerBUILD::MORGANWed Aug 01 1990 08:378
    Naehring has the tools to become an everyday major league player.  
    Sox personnel often compare him to Cal Ripken, IF he pans out.  
    I've been to two games since he's been called up and saw him hit his
    first homer, a shot to left-center.  He has power, is enthusiastic, 
    has a good glove and a strong arm.  He came out of nowhere about a 
    year and a half ago.  I think he's about 23.
    
    					Steve
28.318MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Wed Aug 01 1990 10:4412
    
    August 1st and the Sox are tied for first, despite going something
    like 6-19 in their last 25 games.
    
    The "fat lady", however, is taking voice training and packing her
    bags for the dreaded Left Coast engagement Aug. 7 thru 15th.
    
    BTW, has anyone ever seen the proverbial "fat lady" and Roseanne
    Barr in the same place?  Could it be...?   Nahhh....
    
    Dickster
    
28.319Roseanne sings, part 2.SASE::SZABOGot nothing but hell to pay.Wed Aug 01 1990 11:137
    Roseanne, my ex-babe, has done a studio version of the Star Spangled
    Banner with her husband to be aired on today's Raphael Jesse Sally's
    show.  She did this in total seriousness and offering it as her public
    apology to all offended Americans.  Don't know whether she actually
    apologizes or not.......
    
    Hawk
28.320CAM::WAYShrooms, for the ride of your lifeWed Aug 01 1990 11:2617
While Roseanne's singing is not in any way sports related, I will
digress momentarily to say that most of the reaction around here
was that Roseanne is a comedienne, not a singer, and the person
who should be taking most of the heat is the person who arranged
to have her sing in the first place.

Perhaps she could have sung the SPORTS anthem instead:

	
		Oh give me a home, where the junk notes don't roam
		And the notes don't get hidden away,
		Where never is heard, a disparaging word,
		And differences are valued all day


Chainsaw_Scott_Key

28.321MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Wed Aug 01 1990 11:347
    
    HAHA.  Great tune 'Saw.
    
    Now, bailiff, whack his pee-pee if it's not already "set hidden".
    
    Dickster
    
28.322Rollward, 'Saw!SASE::SZABOGot nothing but hell to pay.Wed Aug 01 1990 11:361
    
28.323GOOBER::ROSSI need a body bagWed Aug 01 1990 11:486
The Red Sox beat the White Sox last night behind the pitching of 
Dana Kiecker, 7-2.   Wade Boggs has been effective so far in the 
#3 slot, driving in a run for the third straight game.

If the Sox can win the AL East, Joe Morgan deserves Manager of
the Year.   That is assuming the White Sox don't take the West.
28.324MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Wed Aug 01 1990 12:4213
    
    Boggs is now hitting like he's on a mission to get those 200 hits
    again this year.  As a side dish, he's also knocking in some runs
    and batting somewhere in the high 300's with men in scoring position.
    Tsk. Tsk.  How selfish. ;^)
    
    He now needs around 85 more hits in (not sure) 54 games to do it,
    but if he avoids all injury, I believe he has the mindset and the
    ability to do it.  If he can chip away to, say, 20 more hits with
    a dozen games to go, I think he'll make it.
    
    Dickster
    
28.325AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Wed Aug 01 1990 12:453
    Dickster, you must be making that up.  Wade Boggs, a well known selfish
    non clutch hitter, has a higher BA with men on base than he does an
    overall BA.
28.326Time for my Xmas list...MPO::GILBERTToo much month at the end of the moneyWed Aug 01 1990 12:5321
    
    Mighty Lou has done it again. He has put a supposedly healthy
    (at least according to himself) Wes Gardner on the DL and signed...
    
    Joe Hesketh...
    
    Former Brave, Former Expo, and hopefully soon to be former Red Sox.
    
    It has to be the curse of Jack Billingham. Lou has to sign every
    misfit project discarded by other teams in hopes of finding that
    one guy who has a little gas left. Reports are that Mr. Hesketh
    will bring his 5.81 ERA in 31 appearances and 5 saves to the Sox
    bullpen and "help" Rob Murphy. 
    
    Lou, how gullible do you think we are? Better yet, how gullible
    do you think the rest of the league is?
    
    Santa, please bring Jean Yawkey to her senses and bring us a real
    GM....
    
    
28.327RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOA Zorro snap in the Z formation!Wed Aug 01 1990 12:5617
    Wade Boggs is a one dimensional, egotistical, me first, non team
    player.   Always has been, always will be.   He hits for average,
    but does nothing else well.  He's perhaps the most overrated hitter
    in the history of the game.
    
    Doug, I can't understand how you can like a one dimensional player
    like Boggs - I thought you didn't like one dimensional players....
    
    He can't play defense, unless the ball is hit right at him - he
    has the range of a legless moose, he moves like a slug with training
    wheels, he has less power than Pee Wee Herman, and he never comes
    through in the clutch - witnessed by his stellar play in the ALCS.
    
    He's another player who will never wear a champeenship ring, unless
    he ends up on another team that can carry his bags.
    
    JD
28.328skip....skip....skip.....skip...skip..JACKAL::DIGGINSMe and Elvis went to McDonald'sWed Aug 01 1990 12:587
    
    Jd your a piece of work!
    
    
    
    
    Steve
28.329GOOBER::ROSSI need a body bagWed Aug 01 1990 13:2843
>    Wade Boggs is a one dimensional, egotistical, me first, non team
>    player.   Always has been, always will be.   He hits for average,
>    but does nothing else well.  He's perhaps the most overrated hitter
>    in the history of the game.

You'll have to try harder, JD... I'm not going to bite.  You just called
Roger Clemens the most overrated pitcher the other day.  You gotta try and
let go of that Boston-based anger.     

What does Wade Boggs's or Roger Clemens' personality have to do with their
ability and performance as baseball players?   
    
>    Doug, I can't understand how you can like a one dimensional player
>    like Boggs - I thought you didn't like one dimensional players....

I don't value them in basketball where deficiencies can be covered up
by other players.

>    He can't play defense, unless the ball is hit right at him - he
>    has the range of a legless moose, he moves like a slug with training
>    wheels, he has less power than Pee Wee Herman, and he never comes
>    through in the clutch - witnessed by his stellar play in the ALCS.

JD's version of "Field of Dreams".   

	"If I say it, it must be true"

Boggs is no worse than the second best leadoff hitter of the 80's and
an above average major league third baseman according to people who know
a little more about the game than you or I.   If you can bring yourself
to examine him in that context, you might be able to be more objective.
Power is a non-factor.   As a leadoff hitter, look at OBA, Runs.     

"Never comes thru in the clutch" is just another baiting phrase.  It's
your definition of clutch.    And at least he has been a key factor in
getting the team to that situation.    

>    He's another player who will never wear a champeenship ring, unless
>    he ends up on another team that can carry his bags.

Rings, shmings.   In evaluating individuals, rings don't mean a thing.
There's plenty of good players without them {Mattingly springs to mind}.

28.330WMOIS::JBARROWSSavage AmusementWed Aug 01 1990 13:3011
    Dickster is right!!!!!!  Boggs needs a lot more hits!  I saw this
    watching a game, was it last week??
    
    The announcer said he had about the same # of hits last year around
    the same time and mangaged to get 200 in.
    
    I believe they said it would be his 8th continuous year with 200+
    hits.....something only a few greats ball players have done!
    
    Wheel
    
28.331OOPS::MACGREGORWed Aug 01 1990 14:164
    I'm fairly certain that should Boggs get #200 he will be the ONLY
    person to do it 8 consecutive times.
    
    The Wizard
28.332RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOA Zorro snap in the Z formation!Wed Aug 01 1990 14:3819
    Doug,
    
    Bogggs is an average 3rd baseman, at best.  He matadors any ball
    that causes him to move in a way that he might perspire.  
    
    ANd remember, no Boston anger in me - I love the town, love the
    Sox.  
    
    Boggs and Clemens are overrated, but so are all boston sports folks
    - oh wait, I forgot, only other cities overrate their players....
    
    Lets see, the Sox have the 2nd best leadoff hitter of the 80's,
    who is the best hitter in baseball in boggs, the best pitcher ever
    in Clemens, the MVP man in center, the next Cal Ripkin at short,
    etc., yet they caint win the big ones.  Hmmm, why is that.  Perhaps
    you need to look no further than the Ego twins, Boggs and Clemens.
    They put themselves first, the team last.   
    
    JD
28.333AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Wed Aug 01 1990 14:4617
28.334How bout another viewpoint...CAM::WAYShrooms, for the ride of your lifeWed Aug 01 1990 14:5629
One thing that I can appreciate about Boggs is the fact that he
worked and works very hard on his defensive skills.  He has improved
tremendously since he first came up.

Is he a natural defensive 3rd baseman?  No.  But he worked hard to get
where he is.  He could have just tried to get along with his phenomenal
hitting skills, but he felt he needed to be a rounded player to 
succeed in the game.

Players are human beings.  Ted Williams always got the rap that he
was cold.  Others have been rapped for other things.  Limelight does
funny things to people -- sometimes it truly changes them, other
times it causes the way people see what are normal human foibles
to change.  Thus a person who is typically shy and reserved can
be labelled cold and standoffish.

We should always try to remember to put ourselves in their places
before we make value judgements. 

How many times have any of you snapped at a co-worker, whether out
of frustration with a situation at home, a car that doesn't run right,
or Uncle Sam taking so much of your paycheck.  Now, imagine the
same situation in major league baseball.  You're still a human being,
you're still frustrated, but now you've got a million presshounds telling
the world that you're a prima dona who snaps at your teammates because
you think you're better than they are....

JMHO,
Chainsaw
28.335GOOBER::ROSSI need a body bagWed Aug 01 1990 14:5949
28.336Clemens doesn't even rate on the overrated scale as long as Wade playsHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThank you, FayWed Aug 01 1990 15:1618
    >C'mon JD, you can't really believe that.  I guess you must have missed
    >that defensive display of [Boggs] in the All Star game.
    
    Yes, JD, didn't that stop he made on a grounder (the one where he left
    his feet and got his uniform all dirty, even though most major league
    3Bs make the play on their feet) in this year's All Star game wipe your
    mind clean of a career of being a statue in the field?  Well, didn't
    it??
    
    He also hit a homer in last year's All Star game, which instantly makes
    him one of the games great power hitters in the eyes of some.
    
    By the way, Boggs is keeping his career record of home and away hitting
    intact this year.  Some will continue to believe that the park has
    nothing to do with it.
    
    Dan
    
28.337AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Wed Aug 01 1990 15:182
    Except, Dan, that those defensive plays shown in the All Star game (and
    there was more than a grounder), are the rule not the exception.
28.338I've already waxed eloquent on his hitting abilityTOPDWN::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Wed Aug 01 1990 15:2616
I'll have to say I agree with neither of the two camps in regards to Boggs 
defensive abilities...

He was a well below average 3rd baseman defensively when he came to the bigs.
He ahs improved himself immensely to the point where he is an average 3rd baseman
now. He doesn't butcher balls hit to him like Garry Sheffield but he doesn't 
have the great range to be an excellent 3rd baseman. 

He is an adequate fielder in a position that most managers rely on for offensive
ability rather than defensive ability. Third base is probably the 7th or 8th
easiest defensive position in the game (arguments between lf and 3rd as easier)
Pitcher the 9th easiest....


Metz
28.339AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Wed Aug 01 1990 15:326
    Apparently JD's rememberances of Boggs post-season offensive
    performances have caused him to overlook the defensive contributions he
    made during those series.
    
    3B 7th or 8th most important position defensively?  That's a new one on
    me.
28.340RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOA Zorro snap in the Z formation!Wed Aug 01 1990 15:3822
    Mac,
    
    I always thought team chemistry was an important part of any team
    sport.   If a team is just a bunch of individuals, it will go no
    where - which is where the Sox are going.
    
    
    Doug,
    
    A simplification.  My comment was based towards the boston media/fans
    that I heard for the 13 years I lived there - Boston always seems
    to have the greatest players to ever breathe, but never goes anywhere.
    I'm just giving back criticisms that we, who are from different
    parts of the country, have had to hear from Boston fans concerning
    other teams and players.  
    
    Re Boggs fielding - wow, he makes a good play every eon or so and
    he's canonized as a Brooks Robinson.  Geez - that's a PERFECT example
    of typical BoSox fans' view.   Wade is, as I said, average at best
    in the field.  He has absolutely no range...
    
    JD
28.341Tied for 1st, but for how long?BUILD::MORGANWed Aug 01 1990 15:4921
    Sheet, when I first read JD's note I thought it was sarcastic in tone,
    but obviously not.
    
    JD, as far as I know, nobody in this note has stated that Roger Clemens
    is the "best pitcher ever", or that Tim Naehring is the next Cal
    Ripken, or that Ellis Burkes is the AL MVP, as you stated in .332.  
    
    Who's doing the exagerating now?
    
    Anyway, back to the subject.
    
    The Sox have been very fortunate to date considering their pitching
    rotation.  Career minor leaguers are pitching as never expected as has
    journeyman, Greg Harris.  I don't know if this is complimentary to
    Bill Fisher, Tony Pena, the demise of hitting in the A.L., or a
    combination of all the above.  Whatever the case, they're holding my
    interest.  Morgan has made his share of mistakes, but managing in Boston 
    isn't easy.  The fans are so obsessed with winning it all, that 
    everyone's a supposed expert.
    
    					Steve
28.342WMOIS::JBARROWSSavage AmusementWed Aug 01 1990 15:507
    JD,
    
    Chemistry in a team is great, unfortunately it is not the only
    pre-requisite.  If the players are lousy then the chemistry 
    means nothing!
    
    Wheel
28.343RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOA Zorro snap in the Z formation!Wed Aug 01 1990 16:0216
    Steve,
    
    Yes, my original note was sarcastic in nature.  All the things I
    said I've heard one place or the other (The RED SOX conference,
    perhaps....).
    
    
    Anyway, back to the Red Sox - they are in town soon (I think) and
    plan to go to as many of the games as I can.
    
    Joe Hesketh is not the answer - unless the change in leagues helps
    him a lot.  I've seen him 3 times this year, and have seen him pitch
    batting practice each time.   This guy couldn't stand getting booed
    in Montreal - imagine what Fenway will do to him.
    
    JD
28.344Boys Don't CryRONALD::VENDERWed Aug 01 1990 16:175
    I'm going to my first Sox game in about 5 or six years at Fenway
    tonight.  Does anyone know who's pitching tonight(haven't seen a
    newspaper  or the news in over a week.
    
    TomR
28.34515436::LEFEBVREShoulda turned left at AlbuquerqueWed Aug 01 1990 16:353
    Tom Bolton is pitching for Boston.
    
    Mark.
28.346Hope there are some entertaining drunks tonightRONALD::VENDERWed Aug 01 1990 17:052
    Thanks Mark.
    
28.347Versus the rejuvenated Jack McDowellVAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Wed Aug 01 1990 17:130
28.348you're only as good as your last outingASABET::CORBETTMike Corbett - 223-9889Wed Aug 01 1990 17:528

>    Tom Bolton is pitching for Boston.


	or as NESN has been sayin Boston's new left ace, Tom Bolton.

mc
28.349AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Wed Aug 01 1990 18:225
    JD, you want to point out where I said that Boggs is a Brooks Robinson,
    or even where I said that he is the best 3b in baseball?  Maybe you
    should just relax.  This crusade you are on to compensate for the
    alleged overrating of Boston players is going to turn you into a raving
    lunatic.
28.350RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOA Zorro snap in the Z formation!Wed Aug 01 1990 19:0718
    Mac,
    
    You never said it, it was an embellishment on my part.  I still
    think Wade is good at one thing only - hitting.  And he's damn good
    at it, at that there is no question.   I still feel he's a me-first
    person, more interested in his precious stats then with the team's
    record.
    
    He's what I call a true, blue, rotis owner's dream player.  Puts
    up great stats, keeps the stat hounds happy, helps a rotis player
    (rotis being a total stats game - takes the human element completely
    out of the game...).
    
    And finally, IMO, Wade's a perfect example of this conference -
    because if Wade was on the Yankees or Mets, and not the Red Sox,
    he'd forever be labeled an overrated, egotistical head case.
    
    JD
28.351TOPDWN::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Wed Aug 01 1990 19:3854
    
>    3B 7th or 8th most important position defensively?  That's a new one on
>    me.


yup...here's my list in order of importance and reasons why...

1 catcher - calls the game, handles the ball every pitch, needs good arm for
		throwing out base stealers, has to be quick to field the bunt.

2 ss	- Needs great range on ground balls, great throwing arm for throws deep
		in the hole, Needs to be able to turn the DP and make tags on
		attempted base stealers. takes cutoff throws.

3 centerfield - needs speed to cover much ground, needs to be quick to get a
		jump on well hit balls, needs good arm for throws to 2nd,3rd and
		home.

4 2nd base - much the same as SS but doesn't need as good an arm. Must turn a
		more difficult dp and have decent range. Takes cutoff throws and
		cover 2nd on steals.

5 rf 	- needs excellent throwing arm to make the throw to 3rd, good arm for
		throws to 2nd and home. Good speed to catch balls tailing away.
		Usually a better much better fielder than lf.

6 1st base - doesn't need great range but must field 10+ throws a game from 
		infield. Must start off difficult 3-6-3 dp. Must be able to 
		cover bunt. Must be able to move off the bag and cover position 
		after holding runner on base. Must be able to decide when 
		stretch is needed and execute it.

7 or 8 3rd base - doesn't need great range, Most balls are reaction plays. Needs
		good reactions and a good throwing arm but only on slow choppers
		Has to be able to cover bunt. Doesn't see to many fielding 
		chances per game. Doesn't get involved in many steal efforts,
		doesn't get involved in much cutoff action. (whenever they let
		a hot shot get past them announcers always cover up :-) :-)

7 or 8 rf - doesn't need great speed usually, weaker throwing arm needed for 
		throws to 3rd, Usually the place where most teams hide their
		weakest defensive player

9 Pitcher -	Out there to pitch and not field. A good fielding pitcher can 
		help himself by fielding comebackers and bunts well. As well as
		backing up the play...


Feel free to discuss....

These are just my opinions..............


          Metz
28.352nawCNTROL::CHILDSand so castles made of sand...Wed Aug 01 1990 23:006
 Excellent arguments Metz can't say I disagree with your reasoning...

 could it have something do with the fact that I catch? :^)

mike
28.353Here's the play at the plate ...SHALOT::HUNTWyld Stallyns RulesWed Aug 01 1990 23:4810
    I was a catcher, also.  Loved every minute of it.
    
    Another reason why the catcher is the most important defensive position
    is that all the other eight players face him.  He is the man who calls
    the shots.  Plus, home plate is where the runs are scored so the last
    line of defense is always the most important.
    
    Just my biased opinion ...
    
    Bob Hunt
28.354It's my favorite posistionCNTROL::CHILDSNo One Here gets Out AliveThu Aug 02 1990 00:2211
Yeah Bob and sometimes those shots don't get heard. Tonights' game we had
a guy dead at the plate and the pitcher cut the ball off. I thought I was
supposed to yell cut if I wante it cut? :^)

even still the runner stopped and we had em dead in a pickle except the
pitcher dropped the ball...

oh well we won anyways so it wasn't that costly...

mike
28.355He should've pulled out of the game after the 1st hit.....SASE::SZABOThu Aug 02 1990 10:374
    Wade Boggs had 3 hits last night, 2 of which were clearly
    selfish........  :-)
    
    Hawk
28.357WMOIS::JBARROWSCan you breathe thru YOUR ears?Thu Aug 02 1990 11:061
    That makes about 118 hits for Wade!
28.358CAM::WAYShrooms, for the ride of your lifeThu Aug 02 1990 11:1225
In my time I've played CF, C, RF and 1B.

I'd say the hardest to play was catcher, but part of that was that
I'm a lefty.  At any rate, the calling the shots part of it is tough
too.  More than any other fielder, I think, the catcher must play
that "what if" game when players are on base.

CF was hard also, because of the arm.  I used to have a good arm.
Can't pitch worth a darn, but could always get the ball within
the catchers reach.  Also had good range -- not much speed, but an
excellent jump.

I will go on record however as saying the hardest thing, I think,
in baseball, is throwing a runner out at 3rd, from RF.  Just being
heads up enough to know when to try for it, and then doing it, are
very hard.

1B was fun.  Always have that old dilemma though -- stretch or short
hop.

I guess I liked CF the best....

Thanks for letting me reminisce...

'Saw
28.359Boggs Watch: needs 79 hits to reach 200BUILD::MORGANThu Aug 02 1990 11:361
    
28.360I clearly hope he makes it again....SASE::SZABOThu Aug 02 1990 11:395
    > 79 hits to reach 200 (again)
    
    How many of those would be considered selfish hits?  :-)
    
    Hawk
28.361WMOIS::JBARROWSCan you breathe thru YOUR ears?Thu Aug 02 1990 11:411
    All of them ;^)
28.36215436::LEFEBVREShoulda turned left at AlbuquerqueThu Aug 02 1990 11:496
    Metz, I'd move RF way up to number 3.
    
    The RF typically sees balls talingin away (from right-handed batters)
    and has the longest throws due to his distance from 3b.
    
    Mark.
28.363Only HoF RF in Fenway...MPO::GILBERTToo much month at the end of the moneyThu Aug 02 1990 12:034
    
    I agree with Mark. But that might be a Red Sox prejudice. We tend
    to hide our weakest defensive player in Left Field.
    
28.364CNTROL::CHILDSNo One Here gets Out AliveThu Aug 02 1990 12:267
 But how many chances does a rf see in a game? Not as many as center or
 second that's why I agree with Metz. While the ball does tail away most
 experienced rf know this and adjust accordingly.

 mike    

28.365born to DH...CNTROL::CHILDSNo One Here gets Out AliveThu Aug 02 1990 12:295
 Also the centerfielder must back up both the lf and rf in case of the
 occasional error, which happen quite frequently in lf at fenway ;^)

mike
28.366glad so many of you agree...how about you Mac?TOPDWN::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Thu Aug 02 1990 12:5011
The reasons I put Rf low was because of the # of chances they handle a ball
in a game, Less range required than CF and not as much thought/decision
making ability required as 2nd.

They do need to have an excellent arm to make the long throw to 3rd but it
doesn't happen that often and a good right fielder can keep a man from taking 
3rd of reputation alone....


Metz
28.367CAM::WAYShrooms, for the ride of your lifeThu Aug 02 1990 12:579
I disagree.  RF, at Fenway anyway, is very tough to play.

That's because if you screw up, there's a toofless bearded mountain
man, and 12 kids from Mefaa ready to tell him he's a waste of skin...

Or is that a ParkDefect(tm)?

'Saw

28.368QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Thu Aug 02 1990 13:2510
   Wade Boggs is god.... and  JD knows  it. He's just trying to get people
   riled up. In fact, JD has a small shrine to Wade hidden behind a secret
   sliding panel in his living room.

   Wow! Seven years (heading for eight) of over 200 selfish hits per year.
   What a greedy little pig! 

   Mike JN

   No offense blah blah pigs, hitters, blah blah wade's mother, blah etc.
28.369Sam Horn at 3B ????COGITO::HILLThu Aug 02 1990 14:5312
    I dunno, but I always thought that teams put a big slow lummox at 1st 
    since it is an easier position than 3rd.  1B does not need an arm or
    very good range, however, he needs to be able to work the feet around
    the bag and know whether he should stretch or take the short hop. He
    also needs to have decent hands, but that goes with any position.
    
    At 3B, he needs to have more range, a better arm, and quicker reflexes.
    With a RH pull hitter, it can be downright dangerous. Look at how many 
    3B have made theswitch to 1B later in their careers. Tony Perez and
    George Brett come to mind, but obviously there are a ton of others.
    
    Tom
28.370Another mystery solved!SASE::SZABOThu Aug 02 1990 15:0111
    Tom, thank you for the "big slow lummox".  Ever since that World Series
    where the Cardinals got shafted and lost to Kansas City, I've been
    seeking the correct terminology to describe Steve Balboni.  And "big
    slow lummox" is it exactly, to a T!
    
    Actually, you should (tm) balboni as the substitute for "big slow
    lummox".......
    
    :-)
    
    Hawk
28.371Wouldn't recognize Frank Howard todayCOGITO::HILLThu Aug 02 1990 15:3611
    That one just came to me... The kind of guys I had in mind were Boog
    Powell, George Scott, Frank Howard, and definitely Balboni. Funny thing
    about Frank Howard is that he's as skinny as a rail these days. I saw
    him in spring training before the '89 season (Yankee hitting coach) and
    had a chance to talk with him. I remember seeing him with the Washinton
    Senators & he and Ted Williams would have batting practice HR contests.
    
    Waht does a ball cost, $2? No wonder the Seantors lost money & had to
    move to Texas!
    
    Tom
28.372SASE::SZABOThu Aug 02 1990 15:446
    > Boog Powell, George Scott, Frank Howard, Balboni.....
    
    Add Harmon Killebrew.  Actually, Balboni shouldn't be included in this
    particular group of lummoxes.  At least these guys could hit......
    
    Hawk
28.373I wouldn't rate 1B over 3BAUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Thu Aug 02 1990 15:441
    
28.374Boggs keeps getting gypped out of Gold Gloves. Poor Wade. Poor BostonHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThank you, FayThu Aug 02 1990 17:029
    >Except, Dan, that those defensive plays shown in the All Star game (and
    >there was more than a grounder), are the rule not the exception.
    
    I believe you.  Not because you said it, understand.  But because the
    Tooth Fairy told me so.
    
    If only my eyes would stop showing me reality...
    
    Dan
28.375Toungue planted firmly in cheek.JACKAL::DIGGINSMe and Elvis went to McDonald'sThu Aug 02 1990 17:477
    
    Of course we all know that Don Mattingly is the best player in 
    baseball, even this season! 
    
    
    
    Steve
28.376Unfounded critisism.USRCV1::COLOTTIRLittle Homer Simpson in all of usThu Aug 02 1990 18:007
    That selfish bum Wade Boggs showed his true colors lasted night.
    With Quintana on first, Morgan called for a hit and run. What did
    Mr. Selfish do?? Promptly laced a ball into RF to move Carlos to 3rd.
    Wow. Imagine that. 
    
    			Rich
    
28.377CAM::WAYShrooms, for the ride of your lifeThu Aug 02 1990 18:151
Gawd, what a heinous display of ergegiously selfish hitting!
28.378AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Thu Aug 02 1990 18:194
28.379Boggs is no Butch Hobson!!!GOLF::KINGRI'll try to keep this reply to only .......Fri Aug 03 1990 00:025
    Gold golves is a garbage award... Just like the world chumps of boxing.
    Its a popularity contest... Range means nothing... A good firstbaseman
    saves a lot of errors for the infield...
    
    REK
28.380Substance over styleHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThank you, FayFri Aug 03 1990 15:0019
    >True.  There was the season that he finished 2nd to a declining George
    >Brett.
    
    Brett may have been declining, but Boggs never approached Brett with
    the glove, and the truth be told, Brett was far from spectacular with
    it.  He just was the best with it at the position in the post-Nettles,
    pre-Gaetti years.
    
    Most of Wade's fielding impressions are courtesy of the Boston press. 
    He has already peaked and at his best was a slightly better than
    average 3B with the glove.  Always had a powerful arm though, which is
    flashy, but not so important at the hot corner.
    
    Most Boston and Boggs fans allow themselves to be easily fooled by
    false impressions (such as the All Star game, and consistent kind
    articles).  It's a good thing I'm around to straighten you guys out.
    
    Dan
                     
28.381Boggs is the Best 3B EVERBOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Fri Aug 03 1990 16:507
    Anyone got a spare set of hip-boots I can borrow in this note?
    
    Dan, you're so full of it lately, you're tarnishing your image in
    here.  How one can tarnish bullsh*t I'll never know, but you're
    doing it!  :*)
    
    Lee
28.382The Gospel according to DanGOOBER::ROSSI need a body bagFri Aug 03 1990 23:1734
>    Most of Wade's fielding impressions are courtesy of the Boston press. 
>    He has already peaked and at his best was a slightly better than
>    average 3B with the glove.  Always had a powerful arm though, which is
>    flashy, but not so important at the hot corner.

	Dan's never one to let stats get in the way of an argument.. Here's
	a breakdown of fielding stats for Boggs vs. Gaetti from 1984 to 
	1987.   George Brett is included where he played enough games to
	make it worth comparing.

		Games		PO	ASS	E       Edge? 
1987 Boggs        147          111      277    14
     Gaetti       154          134      261    11       Even

1986 Boggs        149          121      267    19
     Gaetti       157          118      334    21       Gaetti..
     Brett        124           97      218    16 

1985 Boggs        161          134      335    17
     Gaetti       160          146      316    18       Even 
     Brett        155          107      339    15

1984 Boggs        158          141      330    20
     Gaetti       162          142      334    20       Even


>   Most Boston and Boggs fans allow themselves to be easily fooled by
>   false impressions (such as the All Star game, and consistent kind
>   articles).  It's a good thing I'm around to straighten you guys out.    
>   Dan
                     
 Good thing we Boston fans have an objective, factual, accurate source
 to fall back on.   While Boggs never was the best 3B, he certainly did
 earn his repuation as a better than average 3B.   
28.383SASE::SZABOMon Aug 06 1990 11:4612
    Yeah but, Doug, Fenway is a 3rd baseman's dream park.  Didn't you know
    that?  So stats don't mean squat, right Dan?  :-)
    
    And speaking of stats, Wade has selfishly been ripping the hide off the
    ball in this home stand.  And we all know that, clearly, the one and
    only thing in Wade's mind when he steps up at bat is to get yet another
    200-hit season.  Getting some runners across is purely a_accident and
    unintentional......  :-)
    
    Go get 'em, Wade!
    
    Hawk
28.384RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBuzzed by the Blue Angels....Mon Aug 06 1990 12:5022
    Doug,
    
    Of course, stats don't measure things like range - of which Wade
    has none, and Gaetti has lots.   That's the problems with stats.
     Everything can't be measured in pure numbers.  Wade's a great hitter
    (a singles hitter, and fenway doubles...), and an average fielder
    - which is what has been said ad nauseum.
    
    IMO, the measure of Wade is the answer to this question:  Would
    Wade rather get 200 hits and hit over .300, and not win a champeenship,
    or  would he rather get 100 hits and bat .250 or so and be on a
    W.S. winner?.  My guess is the former.   He's the type that if he
    was hitting .400 with 4 games left, he'd mysteriously pull a hamstring
    or strain his mustache, instead of being a man like Ted Williams
    was.  
    
    You've said you'd take 9 Wade's on your team.  That's great - you'd
    win your rotis. league hands down.  IN REAL baseball, you'd win
    nothing but some individual awards....
    
    JD
    Wade would rather do the first
28.385ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Aug 06 1990 13:197
    
    re: -1
    
    9 Boggs on one rotis team does not make a winner... that would 
    give you average and RPs... but nil in HRs and SBs...  now, 
    talk about 9 Rickey Henderson's or 9 Jose Canseco's and that's
    a different story... (even 9 Strawberries...)
28.386Score : Wade - 1 JD - 0GOOBER::ROSSI need a body bagMon Aug 06 1990 14:3425
>    <<< Note 28.384 by RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Buzzed by the Blue Angels...." >>>
>
>    Doug,
>    
>    Of course, stats don't measure things like range - of which Wade
>    has none, and Gaetti has lots.   That's the problems with stats.
>     Everything can't be measured in pure numbers.


Geez... if over a four year period, two players have roughly an equal number
of assists, that would normally mean they get to the same number of
groundballs.   Thus, it would not be farfetched to say that the players have
comparable range.    Can you explain it some other way????  We're not talking
about 10 games you might have seen.  We're talking about 600 games and over
1500+ total chances and the numbers come out pretty close.  

Just like home runs and slugging percentage are a measure of power,
assists are a measure of range.  It's pretty simple.  It's objective.
It's the truth.   Your biased opinion is just that...  and, worse, it's false.



A team of Wade Boggs {batters} would set records for runs scored.  They
would be a mediocre rotisserie team, though.

28.387[Sigh] If only Wade played somewhere else, he'd be a hero!SASE::SZABOMon Aug 06 1990 14:404
    Doug, for chrissakes, Fenway has a much smaller infield than any other
    ballpark in the universe, didn't you know that?  :-)
    
    Hawk
28.388well, if you're gonna be scientificRGB::DICHIARApeterMon Aug 06 1990 14:456

not to stir up too much trouble, but wade's home field is grass and gaeti's 
is astroturf.  There's a pretty good argument that grass slows down groundballs 
significantly enough to increase wade's range, as you measure it by number 
of assists.
28.389long grass alsoASABET::CORBETTMike Corbett - 223-9889Mon Aug 06 1990 14:470
28.390WMOIS::JBARROWSAll the action begins hereMon Aug 06 1990 14:4712
    Re: Saturday's game
    
    I woke up in time to see Jody Reed get ejected from the game.
    
    What did he get ejected for?  Yelling at that bozo McKeon (sp)?
    
    What made it all the funnier was when they came back from commerical
    break and they showed Reed in the dugout chewing him out.  Boy, was Reed
    livid!  Now if only I could read lips...
    
    
    
28.391CAM::WAYGet Matt Sewell his jersey!Mon Aug 06 1990 14:4811
AFter ingesting an inordinate amount of SPORTshrooms at the game
Saturday, I was able to see this black hole anomaly halfway between
3rd and Home.

Ground balls hit there rocket away from Wade, forcing him to cover
more ground.  

Therefore, Wade is a better 3B.

HTH,
Sweatin_Saw
28.392TOPDWN::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Mon Aug 06 1990 14:4825
Assists are strictly a measure of the number of balls that a players was able
to get to. Which is strictly a factor of the number of balls hit to a player.

I'm quite sure that it doesn't take into account the number of balls hit in the
general vacinity of a player.

Imagine this doug...

Player A has 5 bob Stanley type throwers in his starting rotation..He gets 
1000 balls hit in his general vacinity. He has the range of the Venus de Milo.
He gets to 500 of these balls and gets 500 assists.

Players B has 5 Nolan Ryan type throwers in his starting rotation. He gets 600
balls hit in his general vacinity. He has the range of Ozzie Smith. He gets to 
500 of these balls and gets 500 assists. They are both responsible for the same
number of outs but one obviously has much more range than the other.

Using your numbers they are both equal players....


Yet another example of using statistics to tell 1/2 the story....


       Metz
28.393GOOBER::ROSSI need a body bagMon Aug 06 1990 14:5313
Well, for a 3B, we're talking about 2 assists per game on the average.
The turf also provides a cleaner hop and fewer short rollers that a
player beats out for hits.

To me, there's three ways to gauge range... 

	Coming in on a bunt/tapper...
	Grabbing balls down the line...
and	Grabbing balls to the SS side...

I state {subjectively} that Boggs is above average on the first two and
average on the third.   Combine that with a powerful arm and a good ability
to go out to LF foul area for popups, and I still say he's above average.
28.394STAR::YANKOWSKASHelp Jane, stop this crazy thing!Mon Aug 06 1990 14:5311
    re .390:                                           
    
    Reed got ejected for arguing a called third strike.
    
    re .388:
    
    Point well taken on grass slowing a ball down, but one also gets truer
    hops on turf...six of one, half dozen of the other....
    
    
    py
28.395WMOIS::JBARROWSAll the action begins hereMon Aug 06 1990 15:052
    Thanks Paul, the announcers didn't know if it was something he said
    or some gesture (ha ha) he made to the ref!
28.396GOOBER::ROSSI need a body bagMon Aug 06 1990 15:0647
And no team fields a team of Nolan Ryan's or Bob Stanley's.  There's
bound to be a true mix of ground outs, fly outs, and strike outs over
a four year period.   Twins had Viola and Allan Anderson, two lefties,
who are ground ball pitchers I think.  Bert Blyleven was a fly ball
pitcher {some REAL LONG fly balls in Minn}.  

Here's the pitching staffs for the Twins/Red Sox during that period:


1984			Twins			Red Sox
                        Viola                   Hurst   
                        Smithson                Ojeda   
                        Butcher                 Boyd    
                        Filson                  Nipper  
                        Filson                  Clemens 
                        Ron Davis               Stanley
						Clear

1985			Twins			Red Sox
                        Viola                   Hurst      
                        Smithson                Ojeda      
                        Butcher                 Boyd       
                        Schrom                  Nipper     
                        Blyleven                Clemens    
                        Ron Davis               Crawford   

1986                    Twins                   Red Sox
                        Viola                   Hurst      
                        Smithson                Seaver     
                        Heaton                  Boyd       
                        Portugal                Nipper     
                        Blyleven                Clemens    
                        Ron Davis               Schiraldi  


1987                    Twins                   Red Sox
			Blyleven		Clemens
			Viola			Hurst
                        Straker                 Nipper
			Smithson		Stanley
			Berenguer		Sellers
			Neikro			Gardner 
			Reardon			Schiraldi


I don't think you can make a case for either team being all of one
type.... 
28.397please notice the smilies....TOPDWN::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Mon Aug 06 1990 15:2122
Sorry Doug,

You can't just switch back and forth between subjective opinions and statistics.
Either present the stats that say both 3rd baseman had an equal number of 
balls hit in their vacinity or admit that you are making a totally subjective
observation that Boggs is equal to Gaetti in your opinion.

You can't have it both ways ya know  :-)

Maybe you can invent a "new" statistic that plots all the balls hit in a game
and calculates out the average range of a 3rd baseman and draws a semi eliptical
pattern around them so that you can calculate out who had what number of balls
hit to them and what percentage they actually got to. Possibly # of balls that
the 3rd baseman got to divided by # of balls hit within an average 3rd basemans
range to that player = range index....Or we could just call it the Ross #. 

You SABRE types would have a field day with it and you could all be busy for the
next 10 years calculating it for every ball player known to man :-)


Metz
28.398GOOBER::ROSSI need a body bagMon Aug 06 1990 15:3830
I noticed the smileys... but I'm not a SABR type... {and I do know
those eggheads :-)}.  I look at raw numbers - assists... and conclude that over
four years, if two players have roughly the same number, then they
are probably getting to the same number of groundballs, thus to say 
one has far better range than the other lacks credibility.

Others take those numbers and come up with "Yeah, but he plays on
grass"  or "yeah, but if he had 16 Nolan Ryans..."  I've done no
analysis.   I presented the raw stats and then responded to your
comment by showing that the staffs were not all of one type.  So
where am I going too far?

Brooks Robinson is considered one of the best fielding 3B ever...
He played on grass...  he played on a team with {normally} an
excellent pitching staff...  And the numbers show that he got about
10% more assists per game than Boggs and Gaetti... Making one think
that he probably had better range.   Is that so hard to figure out?
In 1974, Brooks got 410 assists... I don't think Gaetti or Boggs
ever came close to that.   Mike Schmidt did.   Again, another great
3B.   

I'm just looking quickly at the book, but it looks like Boggs got
about 20% assists than Butch Hobson normally did, and about 25% more
than Carney Lansford while with the Sox.  10% more than Petrocelli
when he played there.  About the same as Joe Foy with fewer errors.
You have to go back to the middle 50's and Frank Malzone to find
a Red Sox 3B who got more assists.  And I think Malzone was considered
an excellent fielder.


28.399RGB::DICHIARApeterMon Aug 06 1990 16:0311

your point about robinson is well taken.  however, if the o's playing 
with robinson played against the sox's with wade, i doubt that even you 
would say they were comparable infielders.

of course, i'm biased being a boggs-basher, but you have to give wade the
credit for making the ordinary into the sublime.  how many times a game do you
have to see him fall spin and dive for a ball 2 feet away from him.

if only he'd hit more homers 8^)))))
28.400USRCV1::COLOTTIRLittle Homer Simpson in all of usMon Aug 06 1990 16:588
    That fall-spin-hop-up is a standard 3rd baseman move. Nettles was the
    best at it. Play 4 ft. from the line. Wait on a ball. Then....DIVE.
    I love it. Brooks Robinson hardly ever left his feet according to 
    some people. He just plain got to the ball and threw the guy out.
    Nettles was an above average 3rd bagger, just like Boggs and Gaetti.
    
    				Rich
    
28.401AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Mon Aug 06 1990 19:417
28.402For the Wade Apoligists ClubHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThank you, FayTue Aug 07 1990 17:449
>if two players have roughly the same number, then they
>are probably getting to the same number of groundballs, thus to say 
>one has far better range than the other lacks credibility.
    
    The statistics you presented are not inconsistent with the statement I
    made, which, to paraphrase is that Gaetti is likely the best fielding
    third baseman in the league for the last few years.
    
    Dan
28.403SASE::SZABOTue Aug 07 1990 17:566
    Dan, I just learned over in 320 that Doug isn't really serious in what
    he writes, it's all merely a form of sarcasm.  You must learn not to
    take Doug seriously, as I have.  I'm not miserable anymore and life is
    truly wonderful again.
    
    Hawk
28.404Good start to a 9 game road tripBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 71 to goWed Aug 08 1990 08:4710
    Sox win 6-3.  Brunansky goes deep with a 3 run homer in the sixth
    inning, I believe.  Pena also hit a solo shot earlier in the game.
    Boggs doubled and singled off Langston.  I think I read over the
    weekend he's only batting .170 against lefties on the road.  He's been
    on a tear for about a week now.  Greenwell had 3 hits.  
    
    Bolton went the distance to improve his record to 6-1.  Tonight it's
    Harris vs. McCaskill.
    
    					Steve
28.405GOOBER::ROSSRocket Science for $100, AlexWed Aug 08 1990 10:202
Boggs drove in a run with a bases loaded single... making him 5 for 6 this
year in bases loaded situations with 11 RBI's.
28.406MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Wed Aug 08 1990 10:404
    
    Selfish B is just padding his stats, as usual.  ;-)
    
    
28.407GOOBER::ROSSWilson-Phillips: Two Dog NightWed Aug 08 1990 10:497
It's easy to see that the biggest reason the Sox are still in first place
is Tony Pena.  The difference between him and the droopy-lidded, three-toed
sloth Gedman is enormous.    He sets up so low, that the pitchers seem to
be keeping the ball down.   He's always looking for the pickoff when guys
get on base.  He doesn't worry about the helicopter swing, just hacks away.


28.408BNolton went 8 1/3 and Murphy got his 7th save.VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Wed Aug 08 1990 11:080
28.409COBRA::DINSMOREyanks..spoilers in sept.Wed Aug 08 1990 11:107
    i have never seen a catcher that stay in that position for so long
                               
    ya think he would get real tired.. must work alot on the legs..
    
    
    dinz
    
28.410And he's invented a new language: SpanglishBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 71 to goWed Aug 08 1990 11:1915
    I've been fortunate enough to get tickets to a few games this year 
    7 rows behind the Sox on-deck circle.  My son, who's an absolute
    baseball freak and just shy of 6 years old, asked me why Pena was
    laughing and smiling while taking his cuts.  He thought players only
    smiled after they'd hit a homer or won a game.  I told him the game is
    actually fun and enjoyable for Tony Pena, and to appreciate it while 
    Pena's still around.  He's a pleasure to watch.
    
    That, to me anyway, is the way the game was meant to be played.
    
    It's an ongoing joke in the Sox dugout as they watch Pena catch.  He
    causes problems for the umpires by getting so low, as he's a form of
    protection for the ump.
    
    					Steve  
28.411COBRA::DINSMOREyanks..spoilers in sept.Wed Aug 08 1990 11:305
    Do ya think  Soxfans and players alike will be saying in sept..
    
    
    no maas.. no  maas..
    
28.412CAM::WAYGet Matt Sewell his jersey!Wed Aug 08 1990 11:487
I like what Pena brings to the game.  He looks like a little
kid and he has *fun* playing.....

I read somewhere why he gets so low.  I think it's a carry over
from one particular pitcher that he'd catch, but I don't remember...

'Saw
28.413Let me know ok?SALEM::DODACapone,Floyd,MassPoliticiansWed Aug 08 1990 11:536
Dinz,

Will the fridge in the camper be big enough to hold all the brews 
you're buying? Or should we bring coolers too?

daryll
28.414does the camper have a toilet?COBRA::DINSMOREyanks..spoilers in sept.Wed Aug 08 1990 11:586
    
    
    bring the coolers.. gonna be one of those weekends.. Thank god
    
    Jimbo  mcfall designated  driver..
    
28.415SLEDGE::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentWed Aug 08 1990 12:222
    I believe the story is that Pena was forced down into that "crouch"
    of his by Kent Tekulve back in Pittsburgh.
28.416LAGUNA::MAY_BRWed Aug 08 1990 13:1915
>           <<< OURGNG::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;2 >>>
>                 -< OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid >-
>================================================================================
>Note 28.411                  The Boston Red Sox Note                  411 of 415
>COBRA::DINSMORE "yanks..spoilers in sept."            5 lines   8-AUG-1990 07:30
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Do ya think  Soxfans and players alike will be saying in sept..
    
    
>    no maas.. no  maas..
 
    I think you are probably right, Dins.  When the Yankees start playing
    contenders and teams with decent pitching, we'll see no Maas.
    
    Bruce   
28.417BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Wed Aug 08 1990 13:4911
    Re .405
 
    I think Boggs is dogging it, only 6 trips with the bases loaded.
    Says something about his range, huh?
    
    And, he's only batting .833 in that situation this year, and hasn't
    driven in 49% of the runners.  What a flop!   
    
    :*)
    
    Lee
28.418COBRA::DINSMOREyanks..spoilers in sept.Wed Aug 08 1990 14:457
    whats this lee, you now a sox fan?? Or just part of the Wade  Boggs
    
    fan club? :)
    
    
    dinz
    
28.419anyone heard that?CRUISE::JBONINJohn Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBAWed Aug 08 1990 17:497
    I have also read somewhere that Sandy Alomar Jr. and Santiago have
    molded themselves after Pena, and all are excellent catchers.
    
    
    
    
    John
28.420CAM::WAYGet Matt Sewell his jersey!Wed Aug 08 1990 17:528
Personally, I think that Pena was one of the best Red Sox
acquisitions in years.  Ol' Gorman musta been doin' the shrooms
I sent him when he made that trade, cause it sure ain't like
the other boners he's pulled....

Go Tony Pena!

'Saw
28.421STAR::YANKOWSKASHelp Jane, stop this crazy thing!Wed Aug 08 1990 18:138
    re .420:
    
    Pena didn't come to the Sox via trade, he was a free agent signing last
    winter.  I agree, getting Tony was one of the best moves the Sox have
    made in a while.
    
    
    py
28.422Thanks Paul...and how many K's did Roger have? 8^)CAM::WAYGet Matt Sewell his jersey!Wed Aug 08 1990 18:167
You know Paul, after I wrote that note I said to myself "Self, I think
you screwed up".

I think I must have mixed up him and Bruno, at least in how they
got to the team....

'Saw
28.423TOPDWN::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Wed Aug 08 1990 18:198
It was almost impossible for Gorman to screw up getting Pena via free agency.
Pena basically told everybody that he wanted to play here and after that it
was simply a matter of getting the contract done (although that, in itself might
have been a way for trader Loo to screw it up )


Metz
28.424BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Aug 09 1990 08:288
    Hi dINZ.  Not a Sox fan, not a member of the Boggs fan club.  Just
    trying to stir the pot a bit.  Actually, I think that Boggs is an
    above average 3b.  Not the greatest, not among the next level,
    but somewhere between that second tier and average.

    Lee
    
    
28.425COBRA::DINSMOREyanks..spoilers in sept.Thu Aug 09 1990 09:0212
    Hes turned himself into a better average  3rd baseman..
    
    i was lucky enough to wake up early and see replay of game and see
    
    Parish  deposit one in the stands..
    
    Toronto  wins.. this race gets decided in late september, and i
    know those young Yanks will be spoilers either to sox or jays.
    
    
    dinz
    
28.426SALEM::DODACapone,Floyd,MassPoliticiansThu Aug 09 1990 10:289
Hey Dinz,

Nice article in the Tribune yesterday about how Sox fans are 
getting their revenge for '78, Bucky's canned and now Lou looks 
like he's gonna take the pipe out in Cincy....

I've got plenty of coolers....

daryll
28.427COBRA::DINSMOREyanks..spoilers in sept.Thu Aug 09 1990 10:334
    well i may not be buying any, if the yanks continue  winning, and
    brewers  losing..
    
    
28.4281-1 road trip so farBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 69 to goThu Aug 09 1990 11:076
    The bum's on the mound tonight against Abbott.  He'll take his normal
    start after throwing a career high (168?) pitches on Saturday.  Here's
    hoping the Sox score a bunch of runs, 'cause the bullpen can't be relied
    upon at present.
    
    					Steve
28.429GOLF::KINGRSave the EARTH, we may need it later!!!Fri Aug 10 1990 03:1213
    The Score is 10-2 Sox are leading in the 8th inning.. Bases loaded with
    Boggs up to bat!... Will Boggs go for a selfish hit!..
    Strike one...
    Ball one , check swing..
    Ball 2 close but not close enought!!
    
    Boggs swings.... up the middle for a single driving in 2
    its now 12-2... must have been a "park-effect hit"  Right Dan?
    
    Bluejays lost sox about to take 2 out of 3 from the ANgels and go back
    to 2 games ahead of the Bluejays...
    
    REK
28.430Clemens wins # 16.CRBOSS::DERRYWhat's that song?Fri Aug 10 1990 08:511
    
28.431Rag armBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 67 to goFri Aug 10 1990 10:519
    Had to put this somewhere.  While watching last night's game against 
    Seattle, I believe I witnessed the weakest throwing arm of any major 
    league ball player.  Luis (?) Polonia.  Greenwell flyed to short, short
    left field with Ellis Burkes on third.  Having never observed Polonia's
    throwing arm I was kind of shocked Burkes was tagging.  The throw was
    up the first base line, but even if it were on the money Burkes would
    have beaten it easily.
    
    					Steve
28.432Polonia=="Rubber band"KEPNUT::DIGGINSFri Aug 10 1990 12:167
    
    That was quite a lame throw by Polonia! Small nit Steve it was 
    California not Seattle! 8^) Sox are hitting well as a team.
    
    
    
    Steve
28.433Rag Arm Poster BoyBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 67 to goFri Aug 10 1990 12:414
    Thanks for pointing that out, Steve.  I must have entered a time warp
    and got a day ahead of myself.
    
    					Steve
28.434RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOPhase I ended, 100% delivered!!!!Fri Aug 10 1990 13:1416
    re .429
    
    Notes like that crack me up.  Imagine if Jim Rice did that, he'd
    be railed against as only getting hits when it doesn't matter.
    
    I've taken part in the Clemens and Boggs debates - I don't like
    either, but I do acknowledge their talents.  CLemens as a damn good
    pitcher, Boggs as a damn good hitter.   IMO, however, both are the
    types that won't lead a team to victory when it matters.   Boggs
    especially.  
    
    I guess it comes from being a Sox and a Mets fan.  I know that if
    Boggs and Clemens played for the Mets, many of the Sox fans/diety
    builders would be saying they were just products of New York hype.
    
    JD
28.435AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampFri Aug 10 1990 15:025
    	JD's right.  I would much rather have Doc Gooden's team oriented
    E.R.A of almost 4.xx than Roger's selfish E.R.A. of almost under
    2.xx.  Congrats JD!
    
    				/Don
28.4361918RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOPhase I ended, 100% delivered!!!!Fri Aug 10 1990 15:1112
    /Don,
    
    How many World Champeenships have the mighty individualistic Sox
    won in the last 25 years???             
    
    I'd rather see a champeenship flag flying over center field than
    a bunch of individual trophies in someone's living room.
    
    
    HTH
    
    JD
28.437JD, go get yourself an iced tea and calm down.AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampFri Aug 10 1990 15:361
    
28.438SALEM::DODACapone,Floyd,MassPoliticiansFri Aug 10 1990 18:101
I am not a number, I am a Red Sox player?
28.439CAM::WAYDown on Brickyard RoadSat Aug 11 1990 14:109
The Red Sox will eventually put it together and become
a champion.  Of this I have no doubt.  And, believe it
or not I think it will be in my life time.

And folks, when that day comes, look out, because Freakin'
Lunatic wouldn't come close to describing a buzzin' Chainsaw
that day.....

'Saw
28.440Sox beat M's 7-2. Go up by 3.CRBOSS::DERRYWhat's that song?Mon Aug 13 1990 09:321
    Nice to see the shaving cream and coke cups Saturday night...
28.441GOLF::KINGRSave the EARTH, we may need it later!!!Mon Aug 13 1990 10:043
    I was watching channel 56 last night... The rally stuff was great!!!!
    
    REK
28.442Maybe Noxema will buy the Red SoxAXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChampMon Aug 13 1990 10:291
    
28.443point shaving scandal to followAIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentMon Aug 13 1990 12:264
28.444basesball *is* a game!CRUISE::JBONINJohn Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBAMon Aug 13 1990 13:0813
    I think that it's great that two teams can have so much *fun* playing
    the game. I thought the Arab shieks in the Seattle dugout was pretty
    funny too, then they all changed to Zorro masks, but the shaving cream
    and the coke cans for ears took the cake. Clemens looked like something
    from outer space.
    
    The Red Sox have to be the team leader in practical jokes. A few weeks
    back they actually were doing some kind of voodoo or something, setting
    up a shrine and sacrificing a rubber chicken. Did anyone catch that
    one?
    
    John
    
28.445FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Aug 13 1990 13:4138
    There is only one way to figure out fielding by position and by park
    effects.  Take the number of assists and putouts made at each position,
    calculate the average and then figure out how many above and below the
    average each position is.  Then, do it by ballpark to get rid of the
    park effect.  It won't be the absolute answer but it will be close.
    
    One of the things I've been doing recently is rereading a lot of the
    work done by Bill James and so forth.  I'll admit that James has come
    up with a lot of meaningless numbers but one thing he doesn't do
    (unlike some others, who miss the point) is think a ballplayer can be
    evaluated purely on the numbers.  There is a human factor there that
    can't be quantified.  As kind of a protest to what he has done, he has
    gotten out of the statistics part of the writing and is now
    concentrating on other areas.  If you can ignore the numbers part of it
    the man is a pretty darn good writer.
    
    I think his most positive contributions have been first, to approach
    baseball with an open mind.  There are many myths that have been handed
    down through the generations that needed someone to look at them
    objectively.  SABR first, and then James, have done that.  (SABR btw is
    not just about statistics - it researches history and other important
    aspects of the game).  The other thing has been to try to come up with
    ways of measuring baseball players and how their offensive and
    defensive stats contribute to a team's winning because unlike ERA and
    winning pct for a pitcher, there's nothing in baseball that measures
    these things directly.  I know there's a lot of you who'll disagree
    with me on this, but I think such a measure is helpful.  I will admit
    that it's not a be-all, end-all.  We argue all the time about how much
    Wade Boggs actually contributes to how the Red Sox do, and then when
    someone tries to quantify it, the person who comes up with the system
    for attempting to do so gets bashed.  There's an inconsistency here
    someplace.
    
    People who rely on pure numbers miss the point.  James admits this. 
    Don't blame him.
    
    John
              
28.446Clemens wins 17th. Shuts out A's 2 zip.CRBOSS::DERRYAin't no connoisseur....Wed Aug 15 1990 08:401
    
28.447Clemens 3rd shutout in 4 games. CRBOSS::DERRYno waitress in the sky...Wed Aug 15 1990 08:441
    
28.448more on RogCRBOSS::DERRYno waitress in the sky...Wed Aug 15 1990 08:486
    Got his first ever? win in Oakland.  11k and 1 walk.  Lowered his
    era to 2.06
    
    Canseco and Ricky didn't play.  McGwire got the night off (he sips 
    against Clemens)
                                                         
28.449GOOBER::ROSSYupWed Aug 15 1990 10:1519
Clemens was in complete control of the game until the ninth inning.  He
then gave up a walk and a hit by Felix Jose.   Not having a Dennis Eckersley
to turn to, Clemens had to gut it out.  He got Dave Henderson to fly out
to deep center and then after getting behind 3-0 to Terry Steinbach, worked
the count back to 3-2 before dropping down almost sidearm on his last pitch
to get Steinbach to pop out to 2B.

Chris Berman of ESPN had an "exclusive" interview with Roger and some
interesting things came out:

On his refusal to talk to the press:   He said he felt like he had been
burned by the Boston media, saying that he had allowed many of them into
his home in the early days and they turned around and blasted him later
on when he complained about the less-than-major-league conditions around
Fenway.

On this year:  He was quoted as saying that he and the rest of the team are
trying to win this year for Evans, knowing that he won't get many more 
chances to do so.   
28.4503rd shutout in 5 games Karen, but who's counting? 8^)AXIS::ROBICHAUDGo Brewers! I'm getting thirsty!!Wed Aug 15 1990 10:161
    
28.451GOOBER::ROSSYupWed Aug 15 1990 10:173
Anyone think the Sox would be near first place if they had Rice, Stanley,
Smithson, and Price around this year?   I think not.   The best thing Joe
Morgan did was rid the team of those guys.
28.452MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Wed Aug 15 1990 11:219
    
    SIGN ROGER NOW!!!!  Don't wait till next year!!!
    
    Course, he just might up and leave anyway, even if the Sox offer
    him something equilavent to the S & L bailout, and throw in Quincy
    Market and Martha's Vineyard to boot.
     
    Dickster
    
28.453yea, the sox relievers are just kicking some butASABET::CORBETTMike Corbett - 223-9889Wed Aug 15 1990 11:4719

	Rice probably wouldn't have helped any but with the bulpen the way it
is now would Stanley or Smithson have hurt any?  They certainly couldn't have  
done much worse then who is/has been in the middle relief.  

	Take a look -

Lamp      77 ip 4.09 era
Gray      28    5.08
Murphy    48    6.33
Hesketh    4    6.75
irvine     3    9.00
Reed       ?    ?     so bad he was released

	I think they would have been better off with Stanley and Smithson
over Gray/Reed/hesketh/Irvine.

mc
28.454How do you spell R-E-L-I-E-F? N-O-T R-E-D S-O-X!AXIS::ROBICHAUDGo Brewers! I'm getting thirsty!!Wed Aug 15 1990 12:051
    
28.455CAM::WAYTake FiveWed Aug 15 1990 12:0812
I'm sure I'm exagerating, but I cannot remember a time when the
Red Sox ever had a good bullpen.

I guess you'd have to go back to 1968 time frame...I remember
Sparky Lyle and Lee Stang, but I don't know if they were considered
great relievers (I had only watched baseball for two seasons at that
point)...

Maybe Santa Claus will bring us Sox fans a good bullpen for the next
season......

'Saw
28.456CNTROL::CHILDSNo One Here gets Out AliveWed Aug 15 1990 12:094
Stanley had his days Saw....

but Dick Radtz was the man....
28.457Clemens going for #3!CRUISE::JBONINJohn Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBAWed Aug 15 1990 13:048
    If the season ended today, Clemens would be an *easy* shoe-in for his
    3rd Cy Young award.
    
    
    
    Go Roger!
    
    John
28.458the pen: no arms, no rakesAIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentWed Aug 15 1990 13:1713
    RE: the pen
    
         I hardly think Darryl Irvine can be judged on 3 IPs.  In fact, I
    believe that one of those innings came very early in the year before he
    was sent back to Pawtucket - where he should've started the year anyway.
    
         Gray's been up and down.  Put a fork in Hesketh.  Lamp? (sigh)
    
         Mike Smithson might've been a decent addition to the pen.  He did 
    okay last year, winning some key games and can start or work out of the 
    pen.  However, he probably would've been used as a spot starter and we 
    never would've found about the new improved Tom Bolton.
         
28.459COBRA::DINSMOREgo tigers!Wed Aug 15 1990 13:232
    easy shoo in?? naw, dont think so.. 
    
28.460LAGUNA::MAY_BRWed Aug 15 1990 13:261
    Dins, why don't you bet someone on it?  8^)
28.461GOOBER::ROSSYupWed Aug 15 1990 13:3627
There's too many starts left to give the award to Clemens yet... It's
a five man race, and each probably has 9 or 10 more starts before the
season ends.

The five candidates are:

	Welch, Clemens, Stewart, Stieb, and Chuck Finley where the
	last three are on the outer edge.

Finley is about 100-1, unless he finishes up with about 7 more wins,
	and leads the league in e.r.a. while the other four finish badly.

Stieb is about 25-1, unless Toronto wins the East and he finishes with 20 wins,
	then he'd be about 10-1

Stewart is about 5-1, if he wins more than 20 and Welch and Clemens fade.

Clemens and Welch are even money right now.   If Clemens wins 22 or more
and holds onto the e.r.a title, and the Sox win the East, then I'd call
him the favorite... unless Welch wins 25+ and gets his e.r.a under 3.

If Clemens does win, we all know it'll be because of the Boston media
juggernaut that shapes the collective sporting minds of the nation.

Actually, if it's a close race between Welch and Clemens, I wonder if
any of the local writers will have the guts to pick Welch over Clemens.

28.462RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONice sandcastle....Wed Aug 15 1990 13:376
    Clemens would probably win it, but shoo=in, to me, means no comp,
    by a landslide.   I think that if the season ended RIGHT now, as
    Mr. bonin said, that Mr. Welch would garner a hell of a lot of votes.
    No landslide victories in the Cy Young awards this year.
    
    JD
28.463CAM::WAYI wanna be an Airborne Ranger...Wed Aug 15 1990 13:541
Hekseth....another Gorman Folly....
28.464Barely a whisper about thisHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThank you, FayWed Aug 15 1990 14:008
>Hekseth....another Gorman Folly....
    
    I read over the weekend that Roger McDowell was one of those that
    cleared waivers, and in response to that, Gorman said "We are not
    interested in McDowell."!  If I was a Red Sox fan, I'd take Lou out
    back and shoot him.
    
    Dan
28.465LAGUNA::MAY_BRWed Aug 15 1990 14:025
    
    What about Eck?  Sub 1.00 ERA and blowing out the record for most saves
    in a season ought to be worth some consideration.
    
    Bruce
28.466RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONice sandcastle....Wed Aug 15 1990 14:2813
    Bruce,
    
    The Eck deserve mention, but I think a starter will get it this
    year.
    
    Dan - why would the Phillies put McDowell on waivers, and no one
    claim him?  I know they did it to test the waters, but I caint believe
    teams like the BoSox didn't at least go through the motions and
    claim him.   Geez, the guy is better than anything they have right
    now, that for sure.  But then again, Pat Clements is better than
    anything the have right now.
    
    JD
28.4673ip = nadda, your rightASABET::CORBETTMike Corbett - 223-9889Wed Aug 15 1990 14:337

	I wasn't trying to say Irvine is a stiff (though he might be) it's
just with what the sox have had in the pen all year, I don't see how Smithson
or Stanley could do much worse.

mc
28.468AXIS::ROBICHAUDGo Brewers! I'm getting thirsty!!Wed Aug 15 1990 14:346
    	John Wyatt had a good year in '67.  8^)  Stewart has 16 wins,
    possibly 17 after today and his E.R.A in the last three starts is
    0.00.  I consider him along with Clemens and Welch to be a strong
    contender.
    
    				/Don
28.46915436::LEFEBVREHere's where the story endsWed Aug 15 1990 14:364
    If Boston had a bullpen, Clemens would be 20-3 at this point.  Reardon
    blew at least 3 games that he inherited from Clemens with the lead.
    
    Mark.
28.470LAGUNA::MAY_BRWed Aug 15 1990 14:382
    If Clemens didn't have to play Oakland (which Welch doesn't) he'd hav e
    two less losses.
28.471just when you thought he'd drop itCNTROL::CHILDSNo One Here gets Out AliveWed Aug 15 1990 14:429
yeah and if umps called real strike zones he'd have 5 more losses so take
the supposed victories he lost and balance them against this and you see
he's right about where he belongs in victories but well below what his
era should be....

;^)

mike
28.472GOOBER::ROSSYakkity, yak...bomb IraqWed Aug 15 1990 14:458
The reason I left Eckersley off the contenders list is because normally
the only way a reliever gets consideration for Cy Young is if there is
no real dominant starting pitcher.   

It should be interesting if Stewart, Welch, and Clemens end up with
nearly identical records.   Clemens may pull it out simply because the
West Coasy writers will probably split between Stewart and Welch for
first, with Clemens getting seconds.
28.473Stew is 6-0 lifetime vs. Rog !!!!! YES YES YES !!!EARRTH::BROOKSDowhatchalike, NoteHowYaLike ....Wed Aug 15 1990 16:484
    re .470
    
    And if Stewart go to go against Clemens more than twice, he'd have at
    least 3 more wins ....
28.474LUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Aug 15 1990 17:5244
    'Saw,
    
    From some of the things you write I'd guess you and I are about the
    same age - hence I am left wondering why you can't remember when the
    Sox had a good pen.
    
    As someone pointed out, there was Dick Radatz and that sage, /Don,
    recalled the work of Johnny Wyatt (although Wyatt is better known for
    getting hit in the head when Bob Tillman tried to throw out a runner at
    2nd).
    
    But let us not forget the original Red Sox reliever, Ellis Kinder. Then
    there was Mike Fornieles. How about Jim Willoughby and Dick Drago. We
    also had a monster of a guy named Bob Veale and then there was the guy
    that Zimmer burned up, Bill Campbell. Tom Burgmier was a decent middle
    man - probably one of the better the Sox had.
    
    People laugh but, in his prime, Bob Stanley was one of the best middle
    men-turned-closer the Sox ever had. I also recall a lefty by the name
    of Arnold Early who had a decnt year or two.
    
    The Sox have had their share of good relievers. This years middle
    relievers and the lack of a closer make it a glaring weakness.
    
    But, given the past propensity of Sox management to sell the farm for
    aging veterans (Juan Marichal, Dick Ellsworth, etc) I give credit to
    Gorman for trying to develop (FINALLY!) some homegrown talent while
    seeing if there are any bargains to be had for nothing. Remember, Lamp,
    Sambito, etc came here and contributed and we paid next to nothing for
    them.
    
    However, the Reggie Harris story is one that riles me and is
    indicative, perhaps, of why the Mets, Dodgers and Orioles can
    continually develop good young pitchers and the Sox get so few. There
    is no development in the farm system of the Red Sox. We let a great
    talent like Harris rot down there and Oakland, with Dave Duncan, Tony
    LaRussa, Dave Stewert and others out there have worked with the guy to
    the point where he can pitch in the majors. The Sox? They do the same
    thing with John Trautwine and let him sit on the bench.
    
    Rich
    
    
    
28.475Jim Burton :-)SALEM::DODAHoly War! BatmanWed Aug 15 1990 18:130
28.476CAM::WAYI wanna be an Airborne Ranger...Wed Aug 15 1990 18:4613
Rich --

I'm 31 (be 32 next month), I started watching the Sox in 1966, but
didn't develop the savvy to be a real fan until probably 68 or so.

Some of the names you mention ring a bell...Drago especially.

I just couldn't come up with a bunch of consistent names over a
period of time.  I'd forgetten about Campbell too...

Oh well.....

'Saw
28.477RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONice sandcastle....Wed Aug 15 1990 19:116
    Saw,
    
    Ain't no way you are 31.  I'm 31 and you are at least 25 years older
    than me.  That's a fack.
    
    JD
28.478way to go Murp...CNTROL::CHILDSNo One Here gets Out AliveThu Aug 16 1990 08:5211
Think Lou's on the phone to McDowell today?

how about those announcers are they prophets of doom or what?

 "Well McGuire's the kind of guy you can make look bad all day then
  all of sudden bang with 1 swing he kills ya"....

  inning number 8 they came out with that gem....

mike
28.479jmyoCOBRA::DINSMOREgo tigers!Thu Aug 16 1990 09:338
    mcguire stinks lifetime against clemens, but not murphy..
    
    
    A lack of bull pen  will cost the sox in october
    
    
    dinz
    
28.480AXIS::ROBICHAUDGo Brewers! I'm getting thirsty!!Thu Aug 16 1990 09:5113
    	While Irvine's pitches were swervin',
    	Rivera made an error.
    
    	Then bonehaid Joe the game did blow,
    	When he brought in Murph the derf.
    
    	Because Rob threw up a lob,
    	That Mark hit out of the park.
    
    	But the Sox are still in first,
    	In the division that is the worst.
    
    				/Don
28.481Toronto win?CRBOSS::DERRYno waitress in the sky...Thu Aug 16 1990 09:581
    
28.4825 BLACK..COBRA::DINSMOREgo tigers!Thu Aug 16 1990 10:035
    toronto  will win the division... they lost to chicago
    
    
    KOD  FINALLY GETS PUT TO REST!
    
28.483CBROWN::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Aug 16 1990 13:378
    BS, put to death!  Look what you've done to the Tigers!!!
    
    We/re having a tough year, but you're making it worse!!  
    
    Change that damn P-name, will ya?
    
    Lee
    
28.484could have called St. Louis and tried to get Lee in the game.ASABET::CORBETTMike Corbett - 223-9889Thu Aug 16 1990 13:5918
>    
>    	Then bonehaid Joe the game did blow,
    	When he brought in Murph the derf.

	

	I don't know if you were serious don but others have also blamed
morgan for the loss and i don't think its right.  He made the right move.
He couldn't leave Irvine in. The kid couldn't find the plate, balked, and
threw a wild pitch.  he's also a rookie.  No way would I have left him in.
He realy needed a K.  Although he went against the percentages I think bringing
Murphy in was almost his only choice.  Murphy is a K, pitcher and a has
experience.  The only other option (that makes sense to me) was to bring in 
Gardner.  Seeing Wes hasn't pitched in awhile I can see why he didn't do that.
With the bulpen the way it is his hands were tied and he made the best move he 
could. 

Mc
28.485AXIS::ROBICHAUDGo Brewers! I'm getting thirsty!!Thu Aug 16 1990 14:095
    	I saw the replay of the game on NESN last night Mike, and I
    agree Irvine had to come out.  Hell, he almost threw the intentional
    ball four past the catcher, but Murphy?  I dunno about that one.
    
    				/Don
28.486CBROWN::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Aug 16 1990 14:095
    Right and wrong, Mike.  Wrong, I ain't in St. Louis, but right,
    I can throw as well as Murphy.  Hell, Murphy's so bad, even my Tigers
    would't use him.
    
    Lee
28.487CAM::WAYI wanna be an Airborne Ranger...Thu Aug 16 1990 15:297
Morgan had no choice.  He simply had to choose which poison
he was going to die by.

Murphy is a stiff.  Plain and simple.  The guy makes me wanna puke
every time they bring him in....

The Caterer...serving up those homerun meatballs....
28.488Murphy's LawBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 62 to goFri Aug 17 1990 14:325
    How can the guy go downhill so quickly?  Is he burnt out from pitching
    so often over the years?  One stinkin' pitch and Apollo lifts off. 
    What a shot by McGuire.
    
    					Steve
28.489Is Rocketman on for the weekend??CURIE::WENTZELLI will get byFri Aug 17 1990 14:4212
Is Clemons still slated to go on Sunday??

RE: Murphy

I too have been wondering why he has been so hot and [mostly] cold this season. 
I try to watch the quality of his pitches, and although I by no means any kind 
of expert, he doesn't look all that bad.  Yet he still has an ERA in the 6 
range (probobly a few 10ths higher after McGwires moon shot) and is still 
sliding.  Did he show promise last year or was I in another universe (entirely 
possible ;^))???????

Scott
28.490STAR::YANKOWSKASHelp Jane, stop this crazy thing!Fri Aug 17 1990 15:0112
    re .488, .489 on Murphy:
    
    It's certainly plausible that after being among the league leaders in
    appearances the last few years, Murphy may be just plain burnt out.  
    Will a winter's rest help?  Who knows? 

    >	Is Clemons still slated to go on Sunday??
    
    I hope so, that way my O's will miss him... :-)
    
    
    py
28.4916 on the Richter scale and climbing!CAM::WAY1/2000 @ f2 Fri Aug 17 1990 15:529
Regardless of whether he was ever hot, The Caterer(tm) is serving
up cold meatballs these days.  With Reardon out, perhaps Gorman
should get a life, get a brain, (get a new job - oh please oh please)
and find someone capable of closing.

They can send the Caterer into the RF bleachers, since we could use
a few more hot dog vendors in that neck of the woods....

'Saw
28.492Murph - stop selling stud tickets and pitch!MPO::GILBERTIs it Soucy,Goggin,Marggraf,or UpsonFri Aug 17 1990 18:554
    
    Those who should know say that Murphy is spending too much time
    with his "other" business interests (Horse breeding) and is not
    concentrating on the game. Seems sort of logical to me. 
28.493CAM::WAYZuiko 250mm, 1/2000 @f2Fri Aug 17 1990 19:3014
>    Those who should know say that Murphy is spending too much time
>    with his "other" business interests (Horse breeding) and is not
>    concentrating on the game. Seems sort of logical to me. 

I stand corrected.

Let me rephrase my observations:

	Rob "The Caterer" Murphy should be put in the RF bleachers
	because he keeps serving up cold horsemeat balls to 
	opposing hitters.....

Thanks for the help,
Chainsaw
28.494LUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Aug 21 1990 18:1031
    What do we all think Gorman should do? If there were any REAL bona fide
    closers on the market at this point, they would have been scoffed up.
    
    If Dave Smith is the best out there right now, I'd rather not risk it.
    And that's the real word..RISK. The trading deadline is over so Gorman
    cannot engineer a trade. He has to see what clears waivers. And a real
    closer would NOT clear waivers.
    
    So, rather than risk some future phenom on a used up closer, he's
    risking the race on kids like Gray and Irvine from Pawtucket. I
    actually think he's doing the right thing, at this point.
    
    My problem with Gorman is that he waited too long after it was
    reasonably certain that Raerdon had serious back problems. He should
    have been dealing back in June or around the All Star game. So, given
    the fact that he bothced that opportunity, I agree with his agenda now.
    
    No comments on Marshall and Plantier? I was sort of sad to see
    Lancelotti sent back down but he just didn't produce given a chance.
    The guy is a career minor leaguer and had probably this one last chance
    to play out a meaningful year in "The Show".
    
    I would really like to see Plantier used as a pinch hitter alot down
    the stretch. I watched him alot at Pawtucket and, although he probably
    won't meet the expectations of the Kevin Maas Adoration Society (tm),
    the kid has raw power from the left side. In September, enjoy Mo
    Vaughn. That guy is something to see. Carlos may well be the bait
    we will use for pitching over the winter.
    
    Rich
    
28.495Big series coming up with the JaysBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 57 to goTue Aug 21 1990 20:3814
    As you stated, Rich, there's not much they can do about the relief 
    pitching at this point.  Gorman doesn't have a hair trigger when pulling 
    the finger on trades, but I'm sure they probably expected Murphy to come 
    around by the time the trading deadline passed.  I know I did.
    
    I'm anxious to see Plantier.  From what little I've seen of him, it
    looks like he's got a quick bat.  How is he in the field?  I've heard
    someone say he'll make Greenwell look like a Gold Glover.
    
    Marshall was probably gotten as an insurance policy, which I have no
    problem with.  Dewey's back is uncertain and Brunansky is in a severe
    power slump (and may be hightailing it via free agency).
    
    					Steve
28.496LUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Aug 22 1990 10:0722
    Steve, I've seen Plantier in Pawtucket and he isn't the second coming
    of Paul Blair in the OF. However, I've never been very fond of
    Greenwell as a fielder and I think they are about equal.
    
    Methinks Dennis Lamp will be gone after this season. For a guy who was
    aquired for next to nothing, he has been a good solid member of the Sox
    bullpen for a few years but, alas, has lost it.
    
    Don't be fooled by Hesketh last night. The Orioles must have been tired
    from running the bases so much.
    
    If Kiecker doesn't turn it around in his next 2 starts, the Sox should
    go to a 4 man rotation for September.
    
    Evans may be gone for the season. With Brunansky, Burks, Greenwell,
    Plantier, Marshall and Romine around for OF duty and with Mo Vaughn on
    the way up from Pawtucket, he may feel it's time to get that back taken
    care of. Look for Kutcher to be brought up before Sept 1. I sure hope
    so, anyway.
    
    Rich
    
28.497FRSBEE::BROOKSA radical thinker on a musical levelWed Aug 22 1990 10:325
    re .494
    
    Rich "Sir" Lancellotti had what 4 at bats ???
    
    Not much of a 'chance' if you ask me Rich ....
28.498AXIS::ROBICHAUDFree Case of Sammy's for the tripWed Aug 22 1990 13:376
    	Hey Rich, maybe if Gorman had told Bonehaid Morgan to kiss and
    make up with Lee Smith the Sox would be looking real good right
    now.  Seems like Boston's the only place where Lee was a
    *troublemaker*.  Makes you wonder.  
    
    				/Don
28.499Tigermania three years ago...CNTROL::CHILDSHomey, don't do that gameWed Aug 22 1990 13:496
Cmon Don, why lay it at Morgan's feet? How many times was good ole like
adding gas to the fire? After signing Reardon to such an amount when they
already had Lee they had to obstucate something now didn't they...

mike
28.500AXIS::ROBICHAUDFree Case of Sammy's for the tripWed Aug 22 1990 14:024
    	If Morgan got along with Smith they never would've had to sign
    Reardon.  
    
    				/Don
28.501LUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Aug 22 1990 15:1029
    No question, in hindsight, the Sox made an error with Lee Smith. There
    aren't many guys who can get you 30 saves a year and Smith was one of
    them. So, is Reardon.
    
    Problem was, both Smith and Reardon let it be known that niether of
    them would be satisfied as a set-up guy. So we have to go back and
    figure out why the Sox signed Reardon in the first place.
    
    In my opinion, ever since Smith got stuck on the shitter in Toronto,
    his days were numbered with the Sox. When Reardon was signed, the Sox
    had no intention of keeping Smith. This has nothing to do with Morgan
    although he is, for all intents, a bonehead.
    
    The Sox felt that Smith was worth a lot more than hea actually was. He
    had faded a bit in the last year or 2 and there were bona fide
    questions about his knees, back and heart. Admittedly, he usally got
    the job done but damned if he didn't take you on a roller coaster ride.
    His typical line score was:
    
    		IP	R	ER	H	BB	SO
    Smith (S25)  1      0        0	2	 1	 2
    
    So, if Reardon had been healthy this year and did as expected, we
    wouldn't hear about Smith. But because the unexpected happened and
    Reardon came down with a bad back, the Sox are held up for ridicule.
    Sorry, but I think I would have done the same deal over again.
    
    Rich
    
28.502AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Wed Aug 22 1990 15:215
    No way, Rich.  Smith is younger than Reardan and Reardon has more of
    a history of injury than Smith.
    
    Hindsight, nothing.  I said they made a mistake the day the signed
    Reardon.
28.503LUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Aug 22 1990 15:3011
    I respect your view, Mac, but you haven't been away that long to forget
    the many instances when Smith begged out of the bullpen claiming his
    knees and/or back hurt. I'm not saying Smith was faking but the fact is
    that Smith is not a clean bill of health either.
    
    Add to that the fact that Smith was cahstised for arriving to camp
    every year out of shape and it wasn't really the dumbest move some make
    it out to be.
    
    Rich
    
28.504AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Wed Aug 22 1990 15:5411
    I don't know Rich.  Although some of his outings have been adventurous,
    you don't pile up his kind of stats by begging out of games and
    pitching lousy.
    
    I think people have been skeptical of Smith despite the fact that he
    came through for the Sox because noone wants to believe that the Sox
    actually could get a pitcher of his caliber for Schiraldi and Nipper. 
    People were saying that there must be something wrong with him for the
    Cubs to take the Sox excess baggage.  He then pitched poorly in the
    Fenway opener, and I think that is what a great deal of Sox fans
    remember.
28.505Sox up 11-2. Don't know what inning...CRBOSS::DERRYno waitress in the sky...Wed Aug 22 1990 16:581
    
28.506Now 13-2 after 8AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Wed Aug 22 1990 17:031
    
28.507think the pen will blow it?COBRA::DINSMOREIMTAPMAWed Aug 22 1990 17:181
    
28.50815436::LEFEBVRELet's tear this damned place up!Wed Aug 22 1990 17:203
    Dins, how's the view from the cellar?
    
    Mark.
28.509COBRA::DINSMOREIMTAPMAWed Aug 22 1990 17:315
    the view  could change  very soon marcus..
    
    
    dinz
    
28.510AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Wed Aug 22 1990 17:501
    Why dinz?  You jumpin' on the Sox band wagon?
28.511COBRA::DINSMOREIMTAPMAWed Aug 22 1990 18:002
    NOPE, yanks wont be in celler  much longer
    
28.512AXIS::ROBICHAUDFree Case of Sammy's for the tripThu Aug 23 1990 12:214
    	But they'll be there Friday.  Put the beer on ice tonight would
    you Dinz?
    
    				/Don
28.513Is a 4 game lead enough?CRBOSS::DERRYSkankin' to the beat...Mon Aug 27 1990 08:473
    Sox take 3 of 4 from Jays...  Shut them out 2-0, 1-0 and 1-0...
    Harris is 11-5.  Bolton is 7-2.  Do the fans dare get comfortable?
    I keep waiting for that wrench...
28.514Hoping Against HopeLUNER::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon Aug 27 1990 10:0712
    Although this may sound strange after what just happened, the Sox'
    pitching, lack of speed and power and shortstop make them iffy even to
    win the East. The things they have going for them are a good attitude,
    Roger Clemens and the Toronto Blue Jays. I seriously doubt the Tigers,
    Orioles or Indians has the horses to make up 10 games in a month. But
    the Jays could catch the Sox if just one cylinder misfires at Fenway.
    
    Harris and Gray are pleasant surprises. Kiecker is an anomoly. Of all
    the Red Sox teams I've followed, this really is the weakest since 1966.
    
    Rich
     
28.515The World Series jinx will be broken this year!AXIS::ROBICHAUDDinz welches again!Tue Aug 28 1990 17:371
    
28.516Dinz must have money on the A's...CNTROL::CHILDSBart Gimble,Jerry Hubbard,Happy KineTue Aug 28 1990 18:045
          <<< Note 28.515 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Dinz welches again!" >>>
              -< The World Series jinx will be broken this year! >-

    

28.517MCIS1::DHAMELErect it and he will comeTue Aug 28 1990 18:078
    
      >             -< The World Series jinx will be broken this year! >-

    Why?  Do you *really* think the Cubs have much of a chance at this
    point? ;^)
    
    Dickster
    
28.518Sox 6 up on Jays. 7 in loss column.CRBOSS::DERRYSkankin' to the beat...Wed Aug 29 1990 10:071
    
28.519/Nostradamus told it to me in a dream...AXIS::ROBICHAUDDinz welches again!Wed Aug 29 1990 14:271
    
28.520My P-name says it all...RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JORed&gt; Sox 1990 W.S. ChampsThu Aug 30 1990 11:461
    
28.521Fat chance on WS in BeanburgFMCSSE::BROWNBombBombBomb,BombBomb IraqThu Aug 30 1990 11:556
    
    Get real you guys! The DRed Skunks(tm) will never get past the A's. In 
    fact they still have chance to blow it(As per the norm) before the ALCS
    even starts.
    
    Cadzilla
28.522MCIS1::DHAMELBoston Red Sox, World Champions 1990Thu Aug 30 1990 13:129
    
    -1
    
    No they won't.  The bombing of Iraq and the Sox winning the series
    are listed in the Book of Revelation as signaling the end of the
    world.  At least the Sox fans will go out smiling.
    
    Dickster
    
28.523CAM::WAYJimi and Stevie Ray, jammin' on...Thu Aug 30 1990 13:219
And behold, the Seventh Seal was opened, and out rode the 
Four Horsemen of the Boston Red Sox.


I have more faith in the Sox getting by Oakland this season than
in the past.  We'll have to see, but if they do get by Oakland,
I think they could win the series...I really do....

'Saw
28.524AXIS::ROBICHAUDDinz welches again!Thu Aug 30 1990 14:224
    	Dickster, I thought the final two signs were the Red Sox winning
    a World Series and Dinsmore actually paying off a bet.
    
    				/Don
28.525UPWARD::HEISERfrom Colorado SpringsThu Aug 30 1990 14:284
    At least the Sox are actually beating Oakland this year!  Aren't they
    undefeated against the A's at home?
    
    Mike
28.526Don't think so Mike. Clemens lost to Stewart at home.AXIS::ROBICHAUDDinz welches again!Thu Aug 30 1990 14:291
    
28.527Sorry, but its wait 'til next year - again!AKOV06::DCARRJust call me Carr-nacThu Aug 30 1990 14:3026
    Fat chance that ANY team will beat Oakland this year, after their
    acquiring Baines and McGee...  A lineup of 
    
    Henderson
    McGee
    Canseco
    Baines
    McGwire
    Lansford
    
    or thereabouts, is just too strong, with their pitching...
    
    What really pisses me off is
    
    (1)  how the !@#$ did Felix Jose ever clear waivers?  (If you are Sox
         GM, and that name shows up, how many seconds pass before you
         claim him?  I mean, you KNOW that he's not going to be waived,
         but is about to be traded...   Unbelievably stupid move by the
         incompetent Sox administration
    
    (2)  Why can't we ever pull deals like this, Loo?
    
    I was optomistic until hearing about those acquisitions this morning,
    now, I wouldn't bet against another sweep.
    
    ML
28.528Believe it when I see it but it's fun now! CRBOSS::DERRYComing soon to HLO....againThu Aug 30 1990 14:388
    Scene:  It's a beautiful summer day, in the park.  There's a bench with
    a bat leaning against it.  A guy wearing a Red Sox uniform, is sitting
    on the bench.  His arm is around his favourite girl. 
    
    Guy : "Trust me baby.  I'll never break your heart again!"
    Girl: "Honey, I believe you.... again." 
    
    
28.529UPWARD::HEISERfrom Colorado SpringsThu Aug 30 1990 14:398
    Late season trades in baseball don't seem to affect team chemistry 
    as in other sports, but here's hoping it affects Oakland.
    
    What I mean is that other sports (i.e., basketball) seem to benefit 
    more from team play than in baseball.  A single individual can do more 
    damage in baseball (IMHO).
    
    Mike
28.530Hope I'm wrong but...DOCTP::TESSIERIstanbul or ConstantinopleThu Aug 30 1990 14:4010
ML is right.  Expect another ALCS sweep.  Three of the four games
will be close with good pitching by both sides.  Difference being
that the Sox won't score diddly against Eck, while the A's will 
have a field day against the Sox bullpen in the late innings.  As
for Clemens, it will be pretty much a repeat of '88.  He'll pitch
well into the late innings but will get no support.  Probably
lose on a mistake to Canseco or Henderson.  Stewart will make 
Boggs and company look foolish.

Laker_Ken
28.531AXIS::ROBICHAUDNostra/DONusThu Aug 30 1990 14:494
    	Hey Karen, I still got that cartoon in my office, right on top
    of the Morgan's Miracle handkerchief.  8^)
    
    				/Don
28.532Roger!Roger!CRBOSS::DERRYComing soon to HLO....againThu Aug 30 1990 14:565
    I've got it right next to all my pictures of God.  Mikey, I could 
    copy some of those for ya.  Nice article in today's Globe about him,
    too.  Let me know. 
    
    (-:
28.533CAM::WAYJimi and Stevie Ray, jammin' on...Thu Aug 30 1990 15:1615
re the cartoon:

	Actually, the way the Sox screwed us in 1986, you could have
	the guy saying "Really, honey, this time it is just a
	cold sore....Trust me!"

re Gorman:

	I'm sorry.  Maybe I'm a tad bit uninformed, and maybe I don't
	have all the dastisticks etc, but I think Lou Gorman is clueless.
        I also think the Sox have no chance to ever win with that
	guy in there....

'Saw
	
28.534FSHQA2::AWASKOMThu Aug 30 1990 15:177
    I have it on good authority that the end of the world occurs during the
    9th inning of the 7th game of the World Series between the Red Sox and
    the Cubs.
    
    So it won't be for a while yet.
    
    A&W
28.535CAM::WAYJimi and Stevie Ray, jammin' on...Thu Aug 30 1990 15:197
Yeah, and the box score the next day in Heaven reads


	Chic  vs  Bos   ppd Armageddon


'Saw
28.536FREE::GOGUENBoggs watch: 33 games, 46 hitsThu Aug 30 1990 18:0212
    Amazing, you guys sure know your Revelation (or parts of it).  Ever
    consider taking it seriously??  :-)  And not in relation to the Red
    Sox...  :-)
    
    RE: McGee / waivers
    
    He's a free agent.  Oakland is probably just "renting" him as insurance
    against this year's pennant.  He can fly in the off-season.  They can
    afford a Felix Jose and a minor leaguer or two, most teams can't. 
    That's why they got him (for now).
    
    -- dg
28.537MCIS1::DHAMELPseudo nouveau paraquasi noterThu Aug 30 1990 18:236
    
    >  Ever
    >consider taking it seriously??  :-)  
     
    Nope.
    
28.538Didn't think so........ :-(FREE::GOGUENBoggs watch: 33 games, 46 hitsThu Aug 30 1990 18:481
    
28.539Keep that KoD alive!CRBOSS::DERRYComing soon to HLO....againFri Aug 31 1990 09:152
    Sox keep rollin' along.  Roger wins 20th.  Yanks in town tonight...
    Who wants to predict a NY sweep, in place of Dinz?  
28.540What a great closer.....almost as good as MurphyLUDWIG::GARRYBring on the A'sFri Aug 31 1990 10:085
    Doug Jones is God...........he looked awesome the past couple of
    appearances.
    
    
    Tom
28.541Clemens is a bum! :-) for you of course, MikeBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 44 to goFri Aug 31 1990 10:591
    
28.542this should do itCNTROL::CHILDSWill Soxs Choke? Stay tuned....Fri Aug 31 1990 11:015
Yanks sweep soxs. jays 3 back...yeah Mac no S  ;^)

mike

28.543Rajah! Rajah! Rajah!GOOBER::ROSSMe So CornyFri Aug 31 1990 11:152
The Red Sox now are tied with Oakland for the largest lead over
the second place team.
28.544No W.S. in BeanburgFMCSSE::BROWNBombBombBomb,BombBomb IraqFri Aug 31 1990 11:427
    
    Yea but the DRed Skunks (tm) are still 7 games behind the A's on the
    win list. 
    
    		A's all the way to WS.
    
    Cadzilla
28.545Oh well, there allways next yearFMCSSE::BROWNRound'n Third and Head'n for HomeWed Sep 05 1990 13:468
    
    Can you spell SSSSwwwweeeeeeeepppp? Roger Clemens for the Cy Young,
    give me a break. Eck's numbers look much better, Hell Welch has more
    wins, and  Stewart's thumped him three times this year. Get a clue,
    No W.S. in Beanburg this year.
    
     
    Cadzilla
28.546DASXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Wed Sep 05 1990 13:5710
    Interesting that Stewart has won 3 head-to-head games against Clemens.
    
    But, what does that really mean?  Stewart doesn't have to face his
    own hitters, nor does Roger face the Sox.
    
    So, does anyone have their records against common opponents?
    
    It may be meaningless, but I'd like to see them.
    
    Lee
28.547CNTROL::CHILDSand the wind it cried Mary..Wed Sep 05 1990 14:067
 I think one of the best comments made by Remy last nights was

 "and one of the Oakland batters are hellping Roger out by swing at bad
  pitches"....

 mike
28.548FREE::GOGUENBoggs watch: 27 games, 38 hitsWed Sep 05 1990 14:1511
>    So, does anyone have their records against common opponents?
    
    Let's see -- if neither Stewart nor Clemens has faced the Sox/A's
    except against each other, then:
    
    	Stewart		15-10
    	Clemens		20- 3
    
    against the rest of the league -- their common opponents......
    
    -- dg
28.549FRSBEE::BROOKSSPORTS' Reverse Racist RabblerouserWed Sep 05 1990 16:241
    Let it rest ... Stewart is near-deity .... SO THERE !
28.550MCIS1::DHAMELTools? What Tools?Wed Sep 05 1990 16:3712
    
    The Sox in the AL East are a big fish in a small pond and are the
    cock-of-the-walk in their division. (How's that for mixed metaphors?)
    
    They're just doing the ol' 'possum trick by lulling the A's into
    complacency so they can ambush 'em in the playoffs.  Good strategy,
    I'd say.  Joe Morgan: Supergenius.  Manager of the year! 8^)
    
    Let's go Sox...let's get swept, build up the A's overconfidence
    some more, then we'll show 'em what we're made of in the ALCS!
    
    Dickster the Delerious
28.551How do you figure that Doc?AXIS::ROBICHAUDNostra/DONusWed Sep 05 1990 17:510
28.552DASXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Sep 06 1990 08:447
    Good stats, Don, but that doesn't really say what each did against
    common opponents.  What would be more meaningful to me would be
    each guys's record against each of the remaining teams in a given
    period of time.  Like, Clemens is x-x against Seattle, while Stewart
    is x-x.
    
    Lee
28.553Clemens HurtMPO::GILBERTA Kinder Gentler MAXCIM - D4.3.0Thu Sep 06 1990 13:106
    
    Armageddon is here now. Clemens has a shoulder problem that could
    be a muscle tear. He could be lost for the season. Then again it
    could all be part of Morgan's "let's see how confident we can make
    the A's" ploy....
    
28.554PNO::HEISERlive your life for a changeThu Sep 06 1990 13:164
    What were the scores for the last 2 nights?
    
    Thanks,
    Mike
28.555MCIS1::DHAMELHow much you wanna bet I fit this P-nameThu Sep 06 1990 13:257
    
    >    What were the scores for the last 2 nights?

    Don't know.  They haven't finished adding them up yet.
    
    Dickster
    
28.556FMCSSE::BROWNRound'n Third and Head'n for HomeThu Sep 06 1990 14:394
    
    Last night was another un-important lose, 10 - zip to the A's.
    
    Cadzilla 
28.557hey Karen, this one's for you!FDCV07::GARBARINOWed Sep 12 1990 16:254
Down to 3 GONGS !!!


Joe (returning the favor)
28.5583 GONGS up looks ahellofalot better than 21 GONGS back. (-:CRBOSS::DERRYsometimes we walk alone...Wed Sep 12 1990 17:591
    
28.559...not if you're in the running for the 1st pick in the draft...!ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Sep 12 1990 18:101
    
28.560BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Sep 13 1990 08:343
    Sox win, Jays lose, lead back up to 4.
    
    Lee
28.561I still listen for the DJ's not the musicCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meThu Sep 13 1990 10:1613
 got to share this BCN joke with those who don't get it or don't both to
 listen now that they're all hits radio all the time...

 one of their usual feature is Sports for Girls (big intro music, dateline
 type typing etc) and then the girl comes on and speaks

 "I don't get it how can the Red Soxs have a 2 1/2 game lead over the Bluejays?
  I don't think it's fair how can they charge full admission for a 1/2 game?"

 obviously our women readers are excempt from this joke as they fully 
 understand the standings and how they work....

mike
28.562-GONG, -GONG, -GONG, -GONGAXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers...Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Sep 13 1990 10:221
    
28.563STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Sep 13 1990 10:418
    re the last few:
    
    When the Red Sox are in first place, Eddie Anvilhead says that they're
    x number of kisses (not gongs) in first.  The gongs come into play only
    when they're out of first.
    
    
    py
28.564I like negative gongs better Paul. 8^)AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers...Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Sep 13 1990 11:111
    
28.565butFDCV07::GARBARINOThu Sep 13 1990 18:527
>        -< 3 GONGS up looks ahellofalot better than 21 GONGS back. (-: >-

but it won't mean nuthin' if they don't win it all....
For me, "it ain't worth the trip if ya come back empty-handed".


Joe
28.566SALEM::DODANo scalping at Sinead O'Connor concertsThu Sep 13 1990 19:013
Then you've been savin' plenty on mileage lately, huh Joe?

daryll
28.567LAGUNA::MAY_BRThu Sep 13 1990 22:296
    re .565
    
    Joe,
    
    Even if you have the worst record in the league and almost all of
    baseball?
28.568Who was It???CSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Fri Sep 14 1990 01:219
    
    
    Question for you dedicated Red Sox Fans.
    
    Who was the batter that won the game for the Sox in the Playoff
    series against the Angels in 1986?
    
    Drewski
    
28.569Not a 'dedicated' fan thoughWMOIS::RIEU_DRead his Lips...Know New Taxes!!Fri Sep 14 1990 09:322
       Dave Henderson?
                                    Denny
28.570HenduBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: Snaps bat with 27 to goFri Sep 14 1990 10:215
    Don Baylor hit one out to put the Sox in a position to win and as Denny
    noted, Dave Henderson hit one out with two strikes and two outs in the
    ninth.  The guy had an incredible playoff/series year in '86.
    
    					Steve
28.571Talk about "CLUTCH"CURIE::WENTZELLOnly 3 more days!Fri Sep 14 1990 13:125
I had a flat tire on I-95 in NH when Hendu hit that dinger, listing to the game 
on the radio as I struggled with the spare.  I started dancing around on the 
side of the road, passing cars honking as they sped by.  I'll never forget it.

Scott
28.572WMOIS::JBARROWSSilence speaks as loud as wordsFri Sep 14 1990 13:336
    Scott,
    
    You best change that p-name; it's tomorrow!
    
    :^)
    
28.573FDCV07::GARBARINOFri Sep 14 1990 13:475
>    Even if you have the worst record in the league and almost all of
>    baseball?

Not following ya Bruce.  What's this got to do with the Sox' possibilities
of winning it all ?
28.574Being 20+ games back you have to say something like this....CRBOSS::DERRYsometimes we walk alone...Fri Sep 14 1990 14:097
>but it won't mean nuthin' if they don't win it all....
>For me, "it ain't worth the trip if ya come back empty-handed".

Yeah, and tell me that if the Yanks finished 2nd and the Sox finished 50 games
out you wouldn't be somewhat satisfied with the season.  Uh-huh.  I believe
ya. 

28.575Talk about anything but NY these days...SALEM::DODANo scalping at Sinead O'Connor concertsFri Sep 14 1990 14:185
Boy, mention the Yankees and all the NY fans start to ask what 
note we're in, what does this have to do with the Sox, etc 
etc....

daryll
28.576AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sFri Sep 14 1990 14:501
    	Still holding at -4 gongs.
28.577STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Sep 14 1990 15:094
    What's with the Red Sox conference today?  I'm unable to access it.
    
    
    py
28.578DELNI::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 14 1990 15:155
    
    Looks like SHPLOG's down, HARBOR's up.  Do a mod/file=HARBOR::RED_SOX. 
    
    glenn
    
28.579my mail's still working, how about yours? :-) SASE::SZABOFri Sep 14 1990 15:191
    
28.580COBRA::DINSMORERodney Hampton...ROYFri Sep 14 1990 15:216
    
    toronto by the end of 9 more days will close gap to 2
    
    
    dinz
    
28.581STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Sep 14 1990 15:276
    re .578:
    
    Changing my entry to HARBOR::RED_SOX did the trick, thanks Glenn.
    
                                                                
    py
28.582Dinz, send me mail...AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sFri Sep 14 1990 15:351
    
28.583I guess it comes down to, "what are you playing for ?"FDCV07::GARBARINOFri Sep 14 1990 16:0012
>Yeah, and tell me that if the Yanks finished 2nd and the Sox finished 50 games
>out you wouldn't be somewhat satisfied with the season.  Uh-huh.  I believe
>ya.

Believe it.  The most painful Yankees' seasons were '80 and '81, when
they had one of the best teams in baseball and didn't win it all.

What's that old line ?..."that (2nd place) and a quarter will get you
a cup of coffee".


Joe
28.584BUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: Snaps bat with 27 to goFri Sep 14 1990 16:5011
    How many Yankee fans (or baseball fans for that matter) predicted the 
    Red Sox would be four games up with 3 weeks to go.  This season has been 
    a total surprise, and anything more will be an added plus.  Oakland has
    all the horses, so the pressure's on them.
    
    If you really think the season's a total waste when you don't win it all, 
    I believe you've got a warped sense of what sports is all about.  You
    ought to know that, being a fan of Syracuse.  This isn't meant as a dig 
    either.
    
    					Steve
28.585The "Yank-me index" is born :-) :-)AKOV06::DCARRJust call me Carr-nacFri Sep 14 1990 17:2916
    Gee, five replies and nobody thanked Dinz for the KOD he layed on the
    B-Jays (tm :-)...
    
    And Joe, you're either missing the point or you're being a pain in the
    ass :-)  The point is, the first criterion of a successfull Sox
    season, for many Boston fans (yours truly included), is: did we finish
    ahead of the hated Yanks?...  just I as KNOW that many Yank-me fans
    consider their season a success if they finish ahead of the Sox...
                             
    Given that, and the expectations at the beginning of the season, this
    has been a WONDERFUL year for Yank-me haters, and, obviously, the worst
    nightmare of Yank-me fans/Sox haters...   Maybe we can come up with a
    "Yank-me" index that rates each season by the number of games ahead of
    the Yank-me's the Sox are :-)
    
    ML
28.586FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Sep 14 1990 17:327
    For the fans, well, maybe.  For the organization, finishing with
    anything less than a championship can be a success but being
    *SATISFIED* with anything less than a championship is putting the
    organization on the road to failure.  That's the complaint I, and many
    other New Englanders, have with the Red Sox and management.
    
    John
28.587CAM::WAYBatman plays rugby...Robin plays softballFri Sep 14 1990 17:409
>    For the fans, well, maybe.  For the organization, finishing with
>    anything less than a championship can be a success but being
>    *SATISFIED* with anything less than a championship is putting the
>    organization on the road to failure.  That's the complaint I, and many
>    other New Englanders, have with the Red Sox and management.
    
Which is something Whalers fans have been complaining about for years!

'Saw
28.588MCIS1::DHAMELIraq nuked;film after Sox hilitesFri Sep 14 1990 17:4430
    
    Re: .584
    
    Ya know, Steve, that's a good point.  "Has blank ever won the blank?"
    does seem to show up a lot in this file.  If winning the whole thing
    is the only thing, then what is the purpose of a season in the first
    place?  Why not just have an annual tournament, and only watch when
    your team is in the finals? (The potential deciding game at that,
    since anything prior would be pointless.)
    
    Winning the whole shootin' match, or the *hope* of winning it all,
    is what certainly keeps a lot of Red Sox fans going to games.  It's the
    thrill of the hunt that gets the heart beating.  And just like real
    hunting and fishing, it ain't necessarily the piece of meat or fish
    on the plate that provides the greatest satisfaction, but what led
    up to it.
             
    The greater the odds, the bigger the victory.  The Sox have never
    been favored to win a series in my lifetime, and they lost accordingly.
    But the thrill of the games was still there.  Life will go on if/when
    they get bounced out of the playoffs in four.  Then spring rolls
    around, and the heart starts beating again, knowing that the knife
    of defeat could stop its pulsating anytime between opening day and
    the first week of October.  But it's only a game, only a temporary
    death, and we revive our hopes that there is a God in heaven, and
    that the Sox will win the Series.  I'm not sure which one we'll
    see first.
    
    Dickster
    
28.589STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Sep 14 1990 17:4810
    re .585:
    
    > Gee, five replies and nobody thanked Dinz for the KOD he layed on the
    > B-Jays (tm :-)...
    
    Ah hah, so that's why that immortal hurler Jose Mesa was able to
    outduel Dave Steib last night... :-)
    
    
    py
28.590CAM::WAYBatman plays rugby...Robin plays softballFri Sep 14 1990 17:507
Dickster...

It was flowing, man, the shit was just flowin...

Maybe you could give us a reading ;^)

'Saw
28.591Winning isn't everything. It's (well, you know the rest)AKOV06::DCARRJust call me Carr-nacFri Sep 14 1990 17:5117
    John,
    
    I agree with you 100% - and if you recall, I've bashed the Sox org.
    frequently about their lack of desire to make the Oakland-like move of
    sacrificing the future for a championship - now!   My point was just
    that, when the inevitable fold comes, at least WE have the Yank-me's to
    look back on...
    
    And Dickster, I know what you're saying, and the thrill of the chase
    can keep you going in the present: but, when you look back, if you
    haven't won it all, it just CAN'T be a succesfull season - yeah, you
    might have some great memories, etc... - but you didn't get the brass
    ring!  100 years from now, the winner of the Series will be in the
    Almanac.  The fact that the Sox struggled against mighty odds to rise
    up and get swept by the A's in the playoffs probably won't be!
    
    ML
28.592RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOOn site, out of mindFri Sep 14 1990 18:1213
    John H and ML share my sentiment.  You can take the phrase we always
    here about good Sox teams (Who would have ever thought this team
    would be where they are now) and throw it out.   Other than the
    Yankees, no team was out of it, and I've been more impressed with
    Detriot's season than the Sox.  
    
    If the Sox hang on and win the East, but not the World Series, we'll
    be bombarded by Sox fans and scribes saying "Yeah, but who'd a thunk
    we'd go this far, a yuch, a yuch, a yuch."   It fits with the Bostonian
    mold of "We don't have good talented teams, just overachieving,
    hustling, righteous teams..."
    
    JD
28.593BUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: Snaps bat with 27 to goFri Sep 14 1990 18:199
    The point is, JD, this is not a good Sox team.  Big difference.  I was
    dissapointed as hell when the Red Sox teams of the late 70s didn't win
    squat.  I'm not going to jump in front of a bus if the Red Sox don't
    with the World Series this year.  
    
    I'd much rather watch a team of overachievers (read: Bruins) than a
    team of half hearted prima donnas.
    
    					Steve
28.594MCIS1::DHAMELIraq nuked;film after Sox hilitesFri Sep 14 1990 18:315
    
    >Maybe you could give us a reading ;^)

    I can't!  I don't have any mail!
    
28.595RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOOn site, out of mindFri Sep 14 1990 18:4213
    Steve,
    
    I don't think this Sox team is as bad as everyone made it out to
    be.  They were lacking in pitching, and have had a coupl of suprises,
    but I fully expected at least 35-37 victories from CLemens and
    Boddicker.  I knew the run production would be there, it always
    is.    
    
    As for the Bruins, I don't find them overachievers at all - I find
    that a convenient Boston media ploy to ready-make an excuse for
    when they bow out in the playoffs.
    
    JD
28.596MCIS1::DHAMELIraq nuked;film after Sox hilitesFri Sep 14 1990 18:4210
    
    Yeah, it hurts to never have won, but I don't consider the season's
    enjoyment a waste either.  I've had some nice dinners without dessert,
    and (years ago) had some nice evenings out parking without...well,
    you know.  And I have to agree that we gotta have that world series
    and the "you know" sooner or later because there's only so much
    frustration a guy can stand. ;^)
    
    Dickster
    
28.597great stuff on a Friday afternoonFDCV07::GARBARINOFri Sep 14 1990 18:5230
>    The point is, the first criterion of a successfull Sox
>    season, for many Boston fans (yours truly included), is: did we finish
>    ahead of the hated Yanks?...  just I as KNOW that many Yank-me fans
>    consider their season a success if they finish ahead of the Sox...

Ah Dave, I see the center of our misunderstanding.  A Yanks fan's (at least
one west or southwest of Mass) 1ST CONCERN is whether the team can win
the championship, NOT where we'll finish in relation to the Boston Red Sox.
As an example, I mentioned the heart-breaking '80-81 seasons...in '80
the Yanks came to Fenway in Sept, swept 4 and eliminated Boston from the
division title hunt.  But I have to strain to remember this, as the year
is blackened by the failure to win the world championship.


John Hendry, you said it better than I could.  Thanks.


And Steve, when it comes to the Yanks, my participation in this sport
may be warped.  When you're brought up on a diet of Yankees glory, and
you've experienced championships yourself, "the thrill of the hunt"
is nothing unless you get what you came for.  Ask a Celtics fan if
he's satisfied with winning the Atlantic Division, but losing to
the Knicks in the 1ST ROUND.  Better yet, ask Larry Bird.

And your reference to my being a Syracuse fan puts us on common ground.
A Boston Globe writer once wrote that Syracuse is the Boston Red Sox
of NCAA basketball.


Joe
28.598The Year God Became A Phillies Phan, PhinallySHALOT::HUNTWyld Stallyns RulesFri Sep 14 1990 19:008
28.599Yikes! They're really gonna blow this, aren't they?CRBOSS::DERRYWalk away and taste the pain...Mon Sep 17 1990 09:091
    
28.600Yup.CSCOA3::KNORR_CCarolina BlueMon Sep 17 1990 10:181
    
28.601STAR::YANKOWSKASLittle roller up along first...Mon Sep 17 1990 10:454
    This past week shows that this team is toast without Roger Clemens.
    
    
    py
28.602Can you say CHOKE!KEPNUT::DIGGINSMon Sep 17 1990 10:579
    
    GACK....ERP.....GASP....ACK....HMPHHHH...
    
    Just a few sounds from the Red Sox dugout in Chicago.
    
    
    
    
    Steve
28.604MCIS1::DHAMELIraq nuked;film after Sox hilitesMon Sep 17 1990 11:258
    
    Sox are sinking faster than a submarine with screen doors.
    
    But as they say, "It ain't over till somebody sticks a fork in the
    fat lady."
    
    Dickster
    
28.605Still dealing in negative GONGS...AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sMon Sep 17 1990 13:221
    
28.606SHIRE::FINEUC1Mon Sep 17 1990 13:469
Whether the Sox or Jays deserve it can be argued at length.

Reckon that the Toronto fans certainly deserve it for breaking the 
attendance record (not to take anything away from those fantastic Boston
sports fans of course..;^)).

rick ellis
    

28.607AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sMon Sep 17 1990 13:554
    	Yeah but Rick most of those Toronto fans just go to the games
    to peek into the hotel rooms.
    
    				/Don
28.608Let's keep it quite till Toronto's magic number is zeroSNDBOX::HAUSRATHToo many projects, not enough timeMon Sep 17 1990 14:145
    
    Warning to the Anti-sox ..  let's not get too optimistic here..  they 
    might still pull it out and break all our hearts!   :^)
    
    /Jeff
28.609COBRA::DINSMORERodney Hampton...ROYMon Sep 17 1990 14:182
    what dinz of death?
    
28.610Over acheivers all year long....DECWET::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Mon Sep 17 1990 15:2522
Let's be realistic here.

Take a look at the 1990 red Sox and tell me that they have a team that should
realistically be even contending for a division title. Any team that has Joe 
heskith and Dana Kieker in the starting rotation and bullpen that lets up
as many runs as the Sox does doesn't deserve to be in a pennant race.

They've been overacheiving all year and it is starting to catch up with them.

Nobody got on the Orioles case last year when they folded in the stretch and
the Jays won the division. Everybody said that the Jays have so much talent
they should walk away with the division. Why is it any different this year?

With a front office that cares more about the bottom line than winning I'm 
surprised how well they've done this year with a cast of mostly retreads and
unproven players coupled with a few veterans and 2 legitimate starting pitchers.

I thank the Sox for staying in the race as long as they have this year. Who 
knows, if Clemens comes back they might still hang on for the stretch run.


Metz
28.611She's humming as she squeezes into her control-tops....LEDS::OBRIENRMon Sep 17 1990 15:260
28.612Metz, remember the '88 Dodgers?GENRAL::WADEWhat you want? &lt;ooh&gt; Baby I got itMon Sep 17 1990 16:174
    
    	They weren't supposed to be able to beat the mighty A's......
    
    	Claybone
28.613jumping off the bandwagon already?ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Sep 17 1990 16:313
    
    Where are all the Sox fans that we so vocal a week ago when the Sox
    were up by 5.5 games?
28.614AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sMon Sep 17 1990 16:351
    	STILL DEALING IN NEGATIVE GONGS.  VOCAL ENOUGH FOR YA?
28.615CAM::WAYBatman plays rugby...Robin plays softballMon Sep 17 1990 16:389
I think that it will be close, but if the Sox can get Quintana's bat
back in the lineup, they can pull it out.

Wouldn't be like the Sox to pull the old "think I'm gonna fold" routine
on us yet again.

Series coming up with the Yanks -- that should help 8^)

'Saw
28.616AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sMon Sep 17 1990 16:435
    	Gorman's stubborn refusal to put Vaughn on the 40 man roster
    (it *has* to be something with when he can go to arbitration) has
    hurt the Sox.  Even bonehaid Morgan knows he could only help.
    
    				/Don
28.617The most important player on the team ?FDCV07::GARBARINOMon Sep 17 1990 18:489
>    This past week shows that this team is toast without Roger Clemens.

It may be just coincidental (after all, their offense should shoulder
much of the blame for their current problems), but the Clemens example
shows how important it is to have an ACE.  Without Clemens, Harris,
Kiecker and Bolton don't look so good.


Joe
28.618GOLF::KINGRSave the EARTH, we may need it later!!!Mon Sep 17 1990 23:4212
    The Blue Jays traded P M. Guzzo and 2 minors to......
    
    
    Cleveland for
    
    
    P Bud Black...
    
    The SOx play the Birds of Baltimore...
    after jumping to a 5-0 lead now it is 5-3 Bosox...
    
    REK
28.619BoSox and SexDome results pleaseSHIRE::FINEUC1Tue Sep 18 1990 09:1511
    
>>The SOx play the Birds of Baltimore...
>>    after jumping to a 5-0 lead now it is 5-3 Bosox...
  
Jeepers, Rick, thanks for the suspense!!

Now that I have been holding my breath for 18 hours, let us have the
results!!

thanks,  rick ellis  
    
28.620FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Sep 18 1990 10:324
    Sox win 7-3, Jays win 6-4, lead still one game, Collective Angst Grips
    Hub.
    
    John
28.621No bandwagon jumper here...BUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 22 to goTue Sep 18 1990 10:374
    LIKE /DON SAID, STILL DEALING IN NEGATIVE GONGS.  WHEN WAS THE LAST
    TIME CLEVELAND WAS IN FIRST WITH 15 GAMES LEFT!
    
    					Steve
28.622GO SOX!!!!!!!KEPNUT::DIGGINSTue Sep 18 1990 10:448
    
    NEVER MIND THAT! WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME CLEVELAND WAS IN!!!!!
    
    
    
    
    
    Steve
28.623GO RED SOX! WHAT A TEAM!!AXIS::ROBICHAUDRosannePregnant?HowCainYouTell?Tue Sep 18 1990 12:070
28.624CSC32::J_HERNANDEZWow, Good nyborg man.Tue Sep 18 1990 12:1310
    re Clay. 
    
    
    Yeh, but ther 88 Dodgers had Tommy Lasarda to motivate them and Orel
    Hershiser to baffle the A's. The A's clearly were not the best team in
    baseball that year. If they were so good, how come L.A.'s subs beat
    them in 5? Clearly the Dodgers were better.
    
    Granted the A's would stomp the Sox if the Sox even get to the playoffs. 
             
28.625sox choke, no film at 11 (buisness as usual!)ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Sep 18 1990 12:545
    
    re: .621
    
    Cleveland was in first place last week with 15 games left!
    Have clue, huh?
28.626?KEPNUT::DIGGINSTue Sep 18 1990 13:024
    
    re: .625
    
    What league? What Sport? Huh? 
28.627ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Sep 18 1990 13:0815
    
    re: .626
    
    I answered the question, this following statement is false. 
    
    "LIKE /DON SAID, STILL DEALING IN NEGATIVE GONGS.  WHEN WAS THE LAST
     TIME CLEVELAND WAS IN FIRST WITH 15 GAMES LEFT!"
    

    
    My question, when is the last time the Red Sox won a World Series?
    Was it before or after the last Indians World Series win in 1948?
    

    Have the donks ever won an NFL champsionship?
28.628BUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 22 to goTue Sep 18 1990 13:487
    Grono,
    
    Who gives a rat's ass about 1948?  That's history, right!  I mean
    that's what you always throw at us when we sing the praises of the
    Celtics.  The fact is the Cleveland Indians are nuttin'!
    
    					Steve  
28.629ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Sep 18 1990 14:536
    
    Morg,
    
    ... and the sox have been nuttin' since 1918!  Right!
    
    					Paul
28.630Oh ya and like Cleveland sports some great teams.KEPNUT::DIGGINSTue Sep 18 1990 15:039
    
    I certainly hope that your not confusing me with a Donkey's fan.
    No way. Go sox!
    
    
    
    
    
    Steve
28.631Still no GONGS...(yet) :-)BUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 20 to goWed Sep 19 1990 08:301
    
28.632MCIS1::DHAMELNew Sox fans: Welcome into the foldWed Sep 19 1990 11:006
    
    Now's a good time to buy DEC stock and purchase a seat on the Red Sox
    bandwagon.  Line forms to the right, Visa and Master Charge accepted.
    
    Dickster
    
28.633STAR::YANKOWSKASLittle roller up along first...Wed Sep 19 1990 11:178
    When Jose Mesa (whom I thought was no longer regarded as a prospect)
    holds the Sox to just three hits in seven innings, and David Segui (who
    had either 2 or 3 HR all season at Rochester) hits a 3-run HR, you
    gotta wonder if there's something to this "curse of the Bambino"
    stuff...
    
    
    py
28.634ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Sep 19 1990 11:543
    
    Silence at last...  the GONGing has stopped!
    
28.635SALEM::DODANo scalping at Sinead O'Connor concertsWed Sep 19 1990 12:464
Wow, It's as quiet as Municipal Stadium during a pennant race in 
here :-).

daryll
28.636ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Sep 19 1990 13:094
    
    re: .635
    
    Wow... I'm rolling...  did you come up with that all by yourself?
28.637And here's a smiley for ya...:-)BUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 20 to goWed Sep 19 1990 15:008
    Re: .636
    
    You should be the last one to bust chops about comebacks!  I haven't
    seen a civilized reply from you in this file for a good nine months.
    Not that I'm counting mind you, but it does get a bit ridiculous trying 
    to reply to some of your notes.
    
    					Steve 
28.638ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Sep 19 1990 16:224
    
    re: .637
    
    Try NEXTED UNSEEN instead of REPLY then...
28.639FDCV07::GARBARINOWed Sep 19 1990 19:064
>    gotta wonder if there's something to this "curse of the Bambino"

Paul, the "proof of the pudding" will be what happens in "The House
That Ruth Built" this weekend.
28.640AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Sep 20 1990 09:409
    	The "House that George Rebuilt" is more like it.  I'm still
    trying to figure out the "silence" that Paul is talking about. 
    Same people in here all year, are still here.  And it's still only
    one GONG.  Tom Chappel pointed out something to me this morning.
    If you have the one star edition of the Globe look real close around
    the top of page 93.  Looks like some printer has a pretty good sense
    of humor.  8^)
    
    				/Don
28.641WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his Lips...Know New Taxes!!Thu Sep 20 1990 09:432
       Jays last 9 games are on the road.
                                       Denny
28.642WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his Lips...Know New Taxes!!Thu Sep 20 1990 09:443
       A huge crowd of 4.082 in Cleveland the other night. Took some kids
    20 minutes to get to a foul ball.
                                         Denny
28.643AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Sep 20 1990 10:214
28.644COBRA::DINSMORERodney Hampton...ROYThu Sep 20 1990 10:316
    
    Do ya mean throwing the chairs or the quitters  comment, which he
    retracted on news last night....
    
    dinz
    
28.645AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Sep 20 1990 10:346
28.646little Mikey's a real tough guy huh Don?CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meThu Sep 20 1990 10:3611
 best part of the Pena deal was toughy Mikey Greenwall threw a chair at
 Pena's lockers 10 minutes after Pena had left. Just goes to prove there
 aren't many real men on the team. If Greenwall had filberts he would have
 confronted Tony straight up being the coward that he is.....

 While I agree with what Pena did it sure seems like this should have been
 done by the bonehead manager who was just a cheerleader in this fiasco....

 mike    

28.647COBRA::DINSMORERodney Hampton...ROYThu Sep 20 1990 10:368
    
    i tell ya /don, you have been defensive all week, must be pressure
    of the sox doing the jugalar act  that  got ya that way.. i was
    just throwing  a question out, why the attack??
    
    
    dinz
    
28.648AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Sep 20 1990 10:4811
    	'Cuz you're fun to attack Dinz.  And what's a "jugalar act"? 
    Something that involves animals, females and a rubber hose?  Mike,
    I've never liked Greenwell.  He's a Wardlelike (i.e. yuppie) player
    who cain't field worth a lick.  Defensive?  I've been called a
    bandwagon jumper, silent in defeat, etc.  Now if you really want
    to see defensive, somebody ask how the Yankees and Indians are doing.
    Go ahead.  Make my day.
    
    				/Don
    
    	P.S. since we're all so sensitive lately  8^)
28.649COBRA::DINSMORERodney Hampton...ROYThu Sep 20 1990 10:567
    i know i m  fun to attack, just had to see where your coming from
    
    big guy...
    
    
    dinz
    
28.650For whom the GONG tolls; it tolls for TollwayMCIS1::DHAMELNew Sox fans: Welcome into the foldThu Sep 20 1990 11:0813
    
    According to the Glob, some of the regular Sox whiners had a hissy-fit
    that Pena called them quitters in a room full of press people, instead
    of in private.  Greenwell and Evans expressed their displeasure over
    the incident.
    
    Funny, but Joe Morgan commented the other day on how the final weeks of
    the pennant race was going to be so much "fun".  Sounds like your boys are
    really yukking it up while losing something like 14 of their last 20
    games down the stretch.  Hey Joe, are we having fun yet?
    
    Dickster the Depressed
     
28.65199% sure it's the truthCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meThu Sep 20 1990 11:1010
 Don, cmon what do you think he was throwing the chairs around because
 he was happy? Sure the sportswriters would love to label them quitters
 but in this case i doubt they're obstucating......

 mike

  ps: oh yeah  ;^)
    

28.652THE YEAR THAT LOU G. AND JOE M. LOST THE PENNANTWMOIS::E_FASSETTThu Sep 20 1990 11:287
    Will someone please explain why Danny Heep whose batting average is
    .174 and sinking quicker than the sox themselves, keeps getting called
    upon to pinch hit. Does he have something on Joe Morgan or what? Well
    at least the Red Sox will have a fresh and well rested MO VAUGHN for
    next year when he is needed. 
    Eddie F.
    
28.653SALEM::DODANo scalping at Sinead O'Connor concertsThu Sep 20 1990 11:465
Dinz, I think /Don is coming from Maynard....

HTH

daryll
28.654AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Sep 20 1990 11:476
28.655DELNI::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 20 1990 11:529
    
    I saw Pena admitting calling the team "quitters" in an interview last
    night.  And after seeing Burks and Greenwell both swing at first-pitch 
    bad balls in the bottom of the ninth against destruction-prone Gregg
    Olson, demonstrating a complete lapse of mental concentration, I had to
    agree with him.
    
    glenn
       
28.656CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meThu Sep 20 1990 11:5613
 Don, if isn't calling them quitters, then why were Mikey and Dewey
 so upset? Did he forget to invite them to a tupperware demonstration
 or something? Face it Don as much as they have tried to deny it they're
 still a 25 cabs ballclub....

 It will alway be that way with their present upper level management who
 only cares about sitting 2+ million a year not winning. With Clemens'
 problems why didn't they immediately get someone to come in? BlueJays
 can't use Bud Black in the playoffs if I'm not mistaken but they can
 sure use him against the Soxs........

 mike
28.657GENRAL::WADEWhat you want? &lt;ooh&gt; Baby I got itThu Sep 20 1990 12:106
    
    	I know exactly what this team needs........Roger Clemens
    	to come back and hit a few batters!  That'll get the team
    	liking each other again   ;-)
    
    	Claybone
28.658FDCV07::GARBARINOThu Sep 20 1990 12:4018
FWIW, IMO Pena's comments were wrong.  I'd expect his comments to
come from an immature, younger player.  Not from someone who's
been in a pennant race before and understands the pressures of
the situation.

Boston fans, stop over analyzing this thing.  If they lose this
thing, the turning point will be getting swept by Oakland at
home (following a winning streak), and Clemens getting injured.
They then went on the road (where they haven't played well all
year), started losing, and Toronto started winning (mostly at
home).

Let's see what happens once Boston comes home (with Clemens pitching)
and Toronto goes on the road.  Of course it may be a little late by
then.


Joe
28.659we're a team hahahahahahaahahahahahaaaaaCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meThu Sep 20 1990 13:0115
>FWIW, IMO Pena's comments were wrong.  I'd expect his comments to
>come from an immature, younger player.  Not from someone who's
>been in a pennant race before and understands the pressures of
>the situation.

 Sorry Joe, but I can't buy this. Given that Pena knows the pressure and
 the situation he should know something about what type of character
 is required by the players to go for it all something that's obviously
 lacking in the Sox's chemistry. I'll give you that it really wasn't
 his place to do it but when the manager sits on his butt instead of
 chewing his players out then somebody has to step forward and it
 certainly should be a veteran who has been in the situation before.

mike
28.660"me know baseball..."FDCV07::GARBARINOThu Sep 20 1990 13:129
> Sorry Joe, but I can't buy this. Given that Pena knows the pressure and
> the situation he should know something about what type of character
> is required by the players to go for it all something that's obviously
> lacking in the Sox's chemistry.

But Mike, was a "chewing out" necessary, or some other type of "leadership"
sign ?  Sounds to me like Mr. Pena doesn't have a lot between the ears...
ie: doesn't recognize the makeup of the individuals on the club...who
didn't react positively to his stupid statement.
28.661LUNER::BROOKSI can make it 'mo better ....Thu Sep 20 1990 13:4311
    Funny how everyone was lavishing praise all over Pena for his "positive
    clubhouse influence" earlier when the team was winning (along with
    usual Rice/Stanley/et al bash job).
    
    Now the Sox are playing down to their actual level, and Pena's action
    is now viewed in a different light.
    
    Face it, this harmony thing is B.S. Winning is the bottom line.
    
    Something Jim Bouton said was very true, winning tends to breed harmony
    - NOT the other way around (as a rule) ....
28.662CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meThu Sep 20 1990 13:5014
 Joe,  if Pena is out there playing as hard as possibly can what other
 type of leadership is there? The manager lacked the guts what need to be
 said so he said it for him. Probably saw it work for Whitey so he felt
 it was time to take matters into his own hands. 

 As the old saying goes the truth hurts and obviously the babies on the
 team didn't like hearing the truth.

 they blew a 6 game lead in under 3 weeks some type of action had to be
 taken. Right or wrong atleast Pena had the guts to do it and personally
 I think he was right....

 mike
28.663AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Sep 20 1990 13:542
    
    
28.66412354::J_HALPINAcres of Kites!!!!Thu Sep 20 1990 14:028


	All I have to say is, "Way to go Tony Pena!!!!". As to Mike Greenwell,
shut you face, stop throwing hissy-fits and demanding apologies!!! If you think
Pena has done you wrong, prove it on on the field....

JimH
28.665COBRA::DINSMORERodney Hampton...ROYThu Sep 20 1990 14:092
    GOOD POINT JIM, EXCEPT, GREENWELL CANT PROVE IT, AT LEAST NOT
    DEFENSIVELY
28.667AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Sep 20 1990 14:151
    	Steven, you Devil you...
28.669Greenwell gives...and takesHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERNuke the New Kids!!Thu Sep 20 1990 14:3112
    Notice how Greenwell backs up his brave chair-throwing retaliation: he
    plays one ball last night like it was a live grenade, he hits a
    singleton home run with the team down by 3, leading off an inning, and
    then soon after congratulating himself for reaching second on a popup
    the Orioles turned into a double in the late innings, he inexcusably
    goes for third on a grounder to short and is thrown out, costing his
    team a subsequent run.  That's somewhere around the 10th basic
    baserunning blunder that heads-up Greenwell has perpetrated this
    season.  He tries to be aggressive, but doesn't have the brain to know
    when.
    
    Dan
28.670UPWARD::HEISERplay that nice, nice musicThu Sep 20 1990 14:382
    They're just jerkin' their fans around as usual.  They've blown bigger
    leads in less time!
28.671Thank the high heavens they're not playing tonightBUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 20 to goThu Sep 20 1990 14:4124
    Although I don't necessarily agree with the statement, who cares if 
    they're a 25 cabs for 25 players team anyway?  This isn't a job where 
    you're working 8-10 hour days with a team of people such as we noters 
    do.  Gorman and "upper management" felt Lee Smith was a cancer in the
    clubhouse, so they sign nice guy from Western Mass., Jeff Reardon.  The
    same Jeff Reardon that led the league in blown saves last year.  Now
    they have a nice guy in the clubhouse who's at the end of his career, 
    and they trade one of the top relief men to St. Louis where he's
    throwing bb's.  That's bull*.
    
    Greenwell wouldn't know what pitch selection meant if Williams and Boggs 
    whispered the words in his ear every night.  I've never seen anyone
    swing at the first pitch as often as this guy does.
    
    Danny Heep at this point in time, is a total waste of space on the
    bench.  Putting him up there to pinch hit is a total joke.  Morgan's got
    rocks in his head to even think about it never mind actually doing it,
    which he's done the past three games.  
    
    As Claybone says, what this team needs is a healthy Roger Clemens,
    their most valuable player, and I think a league wide candidate for the
    same award.
    
    					Steve
28.672CAM::WAYLookin' for drool next week...Thu Sep 20 1990 15:2935
Chemistry on sports team is a very funny thing.  And like most
situations in life, there is no black and white when it comes
to who's to blame.

While Pena may have had a right to say what he said, he didn't
exercise discretion in when and where he said it.  Likewise,
I'm sure Greenwell felt the barb intensely because he knows he's
a lot to do with causing the remark.

In a lot of sports situations, when you're losing, or on a downswing,
the captain is the logical person to focus on in terms of providing
leadership to turn things around.  Unfortunately, Morgan is about
as useless as teats on a bull.

And the Boston media just exacerbates the situation.  We had a 
small incident on the Wanderers a few weeks ago, where a player
yelled at another player in the middle of a game, on the field,
and using an obscenity.  This behavior was (and still is) clearly
unacceptable, even though in the heat of combat.  It was dealt
with quietly after the game, and an announcement made about it
as the following practice.  I can only imagine the same situation
under the magnifying glass of the Boston media and the resulting
report.....


The Sox will either complete their threatened fold, and soon, or they
will hang on to win the AL EAST.  However, this division within the
team does not bode well for the team in the playoffs.

Bottom line, the teams needs a manager who can manage, a GM who
doesn't suffer from Terminal Rectal-Cranial Insertion like Gorman,
and perhaps a few more players who know how to hit and field....


'Saw
28.673DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Fri Sep 21 1990 08:2915
    That Pena's a bum, alright.  Imagine anyone upsetting the "harmony"
    of the Red Sox.  For shame, for shame.  Let's not worry about winning
    the division title, it's more important that we all appear to like
    each other.  What the heck, blowing a 6 game lead, and in September,
    means nothing as long as we publicly support each other.  Or at
    least don't appear to be non-supportive of our teammates.
    
    BULL!  For whatever his reasons were, he exploded.  Good for him.
    Give'm hell.  
    
    Would some of you prefer that he stew in silence for now, then get 
    himself on to some other team?  
    
    Lee
    
28.674Look ma, I can catch the ball with one hand!BUILD::MORGANBoggs Watch: 20 to goFri Sep 21 1990 10:595
    Greenwell's a hypocrite for getting pissed at Pena.  He can take his
    frightening fielding skills and half bald ugly haircut somewhere else
    if he's gonna act like a little brat.
    
    					Steve 
28.675the saga continues...CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meFri Sep 21 1990 11:028
 and poor little Mikey Greenwall wants an apology but isn't man enough to
 ask Pena face to face for it. If I was Tony I'd give it to him. I'd make
 it a straight right, right on the nose....

 what a wuss.......

 mike
28.676GONGCRBOSS::DERRYLooks like I'm going Republican...Fri Sep 21 1990 13:546
    Anyone got tickets to the Toronto series?  I'll be in the bleachers
    somewhere, on the 28th, watching God (if he throws on Sunday) hand
    the Jays their heads.  Go Clemens!  Go Sox!  What a team!  (-:
    
    Greenwell is a drip.  Always has been.
    
28.677AXIS::ROBICHAUDWellesleyWelcomeWagonMon Sep 24 1990 15:317
    	First the Sox lose two games to what very well could be the
    worse team in baseball, then Bohehaid Morgan says how happy he is
    to be one game out of first place.  Too much!  That's like getting
    beat up by a 98 pound weakling then saying how happy you are you
    have medical insurance!
    
    				/Don
28.678AXIS::ROBICHAUDWellesleyWelcomeWagonMon Sep 24 1990 15:332
    	...oh yeah, and Mike Corbett, wherever you are, Morgan should've
    never brought in that *stiff* Murphy on Saturday night.  8^)
28.679UPWARD::HEISERplay that nice, nice musicMon Sep 24 1990 15:424
    I take it that NY won 2 out of 3 and the Jays lost 2 out of 3.  How did
    Clemens do?  When do they meet each other (Boston & Toronto)?
    
    Mike
28.680CAM::WAYPez...Cherry flavored Pez..definitelyMon Sep 24 1990 15:474
Being a Red Sox fan is like dating the ultimate tease.


I think we should change their name to the Boston Blue Jox....
28.681AXIS::ROBICHAUDWellesleyWelcomeWagonMon Sep 24 1990 15:515
    	Clemens didn't pitch Mike.  Soreness in his shoulder again.
     He's tentatively scheduled to go Friday night.  But don't bet on
    it.
    
    				/Don
28.682we all know how he reacts to pressure situationsCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meMon Sep 24 1990 16:054
 I doubt it Don it's a pressure game.....

 mike
28.683SASE::SZABOMon Sep 24 1990 16:2210
    Here's the scenario......
    
    Clemens, knowing that he's lost his grip on the Sy Yung to Bob Welch,
    is saving it for the Jays series, gambling that the Sox will be tied
    for 1st or 1 game back at worst.  Fresh and well rested, he hopes to
    come in blazing and blowing the Jays away with an impressive Sy Yung
    performance........
    
    Sy Sperling.
    
28.684I buy itCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meMon Sep 24 1990 16:529
or as a certained unnamed popular noter in here explained to me this morning
he's just faking the injury to protect his league leading 1.98 ERA. and this
particular noter is a big soxs fan. ;^)

this seems like a reasonable scenerio to me....

mike    

28.685AXIS::ROBICHAUDWellesleyWelcomeWagonMon Sep 24 1990 16:555
    	Hey Mike...
    
    	STUFF IT!
    
    	8^)
28.686you were right on about the Loonies and Shots though ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meMon Sep 24 1990 17:0011
Hey Don,


 Misfits 58  Bubbleheads 36



 many smiles to you too ole NotraDONus  ;^)

mike
28.687Mikey, you misquoted me! (-:CRBOSS::DERRYLooks like I'm going Republican...Mon Sep 24 1990 18:571
    
28.688but that's the rule not the exception in here K ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meTue Sep 25 1990 10:383
    

28.689COBRA::DINSMORERodney Hampton...ROYTue Sep 25 1990 15:543
    
    whos knocking the loonies?
    
28.690Clemens is back!CRBOSS::DERRYLooks like I'm going Republican...Mon Oct 01 1990 08:121
    Sox take 2 of 3 from Jays.  Lead by 1 w/3 left.  
28.691MCIS1::DHAMELOne game lead, 3 (4?) games leftMon Oct 01 1990 10:016
    
    Gawd, I hate the thought of them facing Carleton Fiske the next three
    games.
    
    Dickster
    
28.692He's back!SALEM::DODANo scalping at Sinead O'Connor concertsMon Oct 01 1990 11:043
Saturday's game qualify as clutch?

daryll
28.693WHATEVER IT TAKES TO WIN!!!WMOIS::E_FASSETTMon Oct 01 1990 11:074
    If the Red Sox are so worried about Fisk hurting them, then the first
    time up in the series they should hit him in the knee with the
    very first pitch. That way he will not be able to play, and therefore
    he would not beat the Red Sox this year. 
28.694Saturday = semi-clutchCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meMon Oct 01 1990 11:360
28.695ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 01 1990 13:404
    
    The clutch game will be the one game playoff between the Jays and the
    Sox.  Clemens will take the loss... bank on it.
    
28.696SALEM::DODANo scalping at Sinead O'Connor concertsMon Oct 01 1990 14:369
No playoff game. Won't need it.

Key to the season was game 1 and the Jays choked. George 
Bell makes Mike Greenwell look like a Golden Glover.

Gotta go, got more mail from Dinz explaining what kind of a tough 
schedule the Giants have had so far....

daryll
28.697DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Tue Oct 02 1990 07:393
    Sox win, Jays lose, magic number down to 1.
    
    Lee
28.698WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Oct 02 1990 09:003
       True lEe, but starting this weekend the 'magic number' will be
    expanded to 9-1-1.
                                       Denny
28.699At least a tie...CAM::WAYHappiness is a loose ruckTue Oct 02 1990 09:216
My paper says the Sox have clinched a tie at least.

Gee, I wonder if for the next ten years we'll be talking about
a Junior f***ing Felix homer that puts us to bed in the playoff game 8^)

'Saw
28.700Wearing the Red Sox suspenders todayMCIS1::DHAMELPersonal name has been SET HIDDENTue Oct 02 1990 10:0516
    
    There ain't gonna be no stinking playoff game.  There are two games
    left, and all we gotta do is win one of 'em.  The J's have been smoked,
    so don't look for them to win both their remaining games.
    
    The Sox have the division in hand.  WHY WOULD ANYBODY HAVE REASON TO
    THINK THEIR GONNA BLOW IT AND BLAM THEM!!!111 THEY WILL KNOCK THE A'S
    ON THERE BUTTS!!!
    
    "Red Sox:  American League Eastern Division Champions".  I like the
    sound of that.  "Joe Morgan:  Super genius"  sounds good too.
    
    Champions.  But we knew it all along, didn't we?
    
    Dickster
    
28.701Boy, wouldn't it be fun if this comes true!!!!12354::J_HALPINThe Delaware: river, bay or ocean???Tue Oct 02 1990 11:059


	I'm going to predict the Sox will clinch the ALeast crown tonite despite
a loss to Chicago. But the Jays will also lose, when former Indian Bud Black
gets shelled by the Orioles!!!! I just knew that the Jays late season 
acquisition of Black would be the deciding factor in the division race!!!! :-)

JimH
28.702IAMOK::AHEARNRams vs. Bengals in SB XXVTue Oct 02 1990 13:1220
    It came to me like a vision last night while watching the game......
    Jody Reed was up with no score yet in the game, and all of a sudden it
    dawned on me......the Red Sox are gonna win it ALL this year!!!  I
    honestly felt that they could have lost last night's game....and the
    next game....and STILL win the East....and then go on to beat Oakland
    and whoever is left standing in the NL!!!  And the reason why they WILL
    win it all has been sitting there staring me in the face all season
    long........the black stripe on their shirtsleeve!!!
    
    They dedicated this season to Tony C. at the beginning of the
    season....and what would be more appropriate and/or storybook than to
    break the 'Curse of the Bambino' after 72 years by winning it all
    during a season dedicated to an individual as deserving as Tony C?
    
    It's in the cards.....it's in the bank!!!!  Boston Red Sox...1990 World
    Series Champions!!!  And as my T-shirt says..."Tony C.   We'll never
    forget".
    
    
    Nelly
28.703AL East champsUPWARD::HEISERultimate, underlyin', no denyin' motivationTue Oct 02 1990 13:183
    Is that 4 out of the last 5 years now?
    
    Mike
28.704although he's more of a thrower ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meTue Oct 02 1990 13:2511
Where were all you cocky FAN's the last two weeks? ;^)

 Bull, to answer your other question the Rocket is a good pitcher, I've
 never denied that. I just don't think he's the best in the game but 
 certainly in the top ten...

 While Boggs and "Wood" Elway aren't even close to the top ten in their
 respective fields hence the overrated tie between them...

 mike
28.7053/5: 1986, 1988, 1990FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Oct 02 1990 13:431
    
28.706Give the guy some credit.KEPNUT::DIGGINSTue Oct 02 1990 13:596
    
    Boggs is in the top 10 3rd baseman in the Majors, in my opinion.
    Can you name 10 better?
    
    
    Steve
28.707why bother?CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meTue Oct 02 1990 14:029
 I was refering to top ten everyday players vs. pitchers and while I can
 I better not cause I'd hate to upset poor ole Nelly by actually offering
 something constructive and ruining his opinion of me.....

 mike



28.708Ha! KEPNUT::DIGGINSTue Oct 02 1990 14:046
    
    Chicken sh*t!! 8^)
    
    
    
    Steve
28.709I'll take plenty of pictures :-)AKOV06::DCARROffice Politics as usual... :-(Tue Oct 02 1990 14:3610
    The "clutch game" is going to be game one, Stewart v. Clemens...
    Although I really don't think its going to matter - the A's just have
    too many horses...
    
    But, they are hurtin' horses, and the Sox have Tony C. going for them,
    and, most important of all, by brother is in Texas for the month and is
    certain that the Sox will win the series and have the parade while he
    can't be here!
    
    ML
28.710what? we have a shot?UPWARD::HEISERultimate, underlyin', no denyin' motivationTue Oct 02 1990 14:573
    Who in Oakland is hurtin'?
    
    Mike
28.711no neck problems (they've never had to look back)AIMHI::DONNELLYDare to be diffidentTue Oct 02 1990 15:103
    Rickey - lots of nagging injuries (ie hip, thigh)
    Carney - back (mucho cortisone)
    Jose - back, mind
28.712BUILD::MORGANTue Oct 02 1990 15:1213
    Re: .710 (Mike)
    
    Canseco's back is not right.  He doesn't have many homers over the past
    few months.  I believe Henderson's thumb is bothering him.  Dave
    Henderson might not make it back from knee surgery, but could be a
    right handed DH.  Of course, he's been replaced by Willie McGee so that
    loss probably balances out.  
    
    The A's didn't have Rickey Henderson when they swept the Sox in the '87
    ALCS, which is pretty scary.  I certainly wouldn't put any money on the 
    Sox should they make it, but hey, there's always hope!
    
    					Steve
28.713better than BoggsCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meTue Oct 02 1990 15:467
ok here's a few in no particular order: Ricky Henderson, Kirby Puckett, Kevin
Mitchell, Alan Trammel, Cal Ripken, George Brett, Willie McGee, Barry Bonds,
Lenny Dykstra, Fred McGriff, Robin Yount, Barry Bonilla, Tony Gynn, Will Clark,
Eddie Murray, Ryne Sandberg, Andre Dawson, Andre Galliarga etc...

mike
28.714Earth to Mike..Earth to Mike..KEPNUT::DIGGINSTue Oct 02 1990 15:527
    
    I said 3rd baseman!!!! Len Dykstra you can't be serious.
    
    
    
    
    Steve
28.715CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meTue Oct 02 1990 16:1314
and I said I was refering to everyday ballplayers not just 3rd basemen. You
called me out you got your answer. Hell i don't follow baseball well enough
that I could even name 10 third basemen. 

Dysktra is a solid outfield, with power and speed at the plate and on the
bases. While this year has been his best he has generally hit around 300
for his career so yes I'm serious. Boggs posess little power and no speed,
he also isn't that solid in the field. 

he's better than he was 5 years ago but it would be hard not to be. Just
playing everyday would force a guy to improve...

mike
28.716Well I meant 3rd baseman! So there! thppptt 8^)KEPNUT::DIGGINSTue Oct 02 1990 16:2310
    
    I guess I misread your note Mike. But If your saying Boggs isn't
    one to put up great power number's your right. He *is* solid in 
    the field in my opinion. When Dyksta (tm) can string together a
    few years like the one he's just had then we'll talk. Boggs may
    not hit for power but he sure can hit for average and get on base.
    Now if someone could hit 35-40 homers behind Boggs..
    
    
    Steve
28.717CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meTue Oct 02 1990 16:5413
 True Steve for Lenny it has been a monster year. Ok let's say their fielding
 is equal for argument's sake, Boggs has the higher batting average but I feel
 Lenny's extra power output and speed makes up for the difference in BA. Like
 I said I believe Lenny is close to a career .300 hitter so he's no slouch for
 average either. The you have to consider the fact that I like Lenny and detest
 Boggs as wimpy I'd rather walk kind of guy and you can then clearly see where
 I'm coming from...  

 ;^)

 mike
 
28.718Dykstra's only edge is in stealsFREE::GOGUENBoSox magic number is 1Tue Oct 02 1990 17:5314
    Dykstra isn't close to .300 for his career.  He's had a career
    "half-year" this year, and that's IT.......
    
    Power??  HA.. even in '87, when Boggs hit 24, Lenny only had 10.
    
    		 G   AB   R  H  2B 3B HR RBI  BB  SO  SB CS  E  AVG
    	'87:	132 431  86 123 37  3 10  43  40  67  27  7  3 .285
    	'88:	126 429  57 116 19  3  8  33  30  43  30  8  1 .270
    	'89:	146 511  66 121 32  4  7  32  60  53  30 12  4 .237
    
    Dykstra this year is approaching Boggs' second worst year, when Wade
    hit .325........
    
    -- dg
28.719Ten Best 3B? And there's no trophy?AKOV06::DCARRHOPEFULLY, you can call me Carr-nacTue Oct 02 1990 17:5916
    I can come close... I can name 7:
    
    Matt Williams, SF; Kelly Gruber, TOR; Tim Wallach, MON; Chris Sabo,
    CIN; Howard Johnson, NYM; Gary Sheffield, MLW; Brook Jacoby, CLE...
    
    Go haid, bash away...
    
    And FWIW, talk about a backhanded compliment: "One of the best 10 third
    basemen"...  might as well say he's one of the 10 best
    chicken-eating-skirt-chasing-slow-white-man-selfish ballplayers in
    history!  WTF!?!?
    
    (BTW, I just had to put that "selfish" line in there - just to keep the
    conversation LIVELY :-)
    
    ML
28.720FREE::GOGUENBoSox magic number is 1Tue Oct 02 1990 18:018
>    Matt Williams, SF; Kelly Gruber, TOR; Tim Wallach, MON; Chris Sabo,
>    CIN; Howard Johnson, NYM; Gary Sheffield, MLW; Brook Jacoby, CLE...
    
    Well, you got 3, Williams, Gruber, and HoJo.....
    
    Jacoby??  gimme a break....
    
    -- dg
28.721Sheffield is bad defensively...bad, bad, badDECWET::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Tue Oct 02 1990 19:208
Even though I am, by no means, a defender of Wade Boggs, to say Gary SHeffield 
is a better 3rd baseman than Boggs is showing either a lack of knowledge about
the game or a lack of observation of garry Sheffield attempting to play 3rd
base.

He gives new meaning to the phrase "Matador the ball".

Metz
28.722GOLF::KINGRPREPARE to die earth scum!!!!!!!!!!!Tue Oct 02 1990 21:404
    After 5 Jays 1 Balt 0 black 1 hitter so far
    Chicago 1 Boston 1 after 4
    
    REK
28.723AYOV28::DHUNTERWed Oct 03 1990 05:315
    Jays 2 O's 1
    Sox 2 Chi 3
    
    It's down to the wire - whose pitching?
    
28.724Game #162BUILD::MORGANWed Oct 03 1990 08:0220
   > It's down to the wire - whose pitching?
 
                     W-L   ERA
    CHI  Fernandez   5-4   3.95
    BOS  Boddicker  16-8   3.42
    
    TOR  Stieb	    18-6   2.95
    BAL  McDonald    8-5   2.45
    
    I should have known all along it would come down to this, and maybe
    even tomorrow.  Should there be a playoff game, in Toronto tomorrow,
    it'll be Clemens against probably Stottlemyre.  Of course, that'll
    severely screw up my plans to go fishing, but why do I have a feeling
    that it's going to be so?  The Red Sox are the only team to be involved
    in the American League's only two playoff games.  They've lost both.
    
    Mike, stick to basketball.  You don't know what you're talking about
    when it comes to balls and bats!  :-)
    
    					Steve
28.725but Lenny split time with Mookie....CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meWed Oct 03 1990 09:105
 Well Steve, I do know this the Red Soxs, never ever do anything easy.
 As much as I bash them, I do hope for my friends that they pull it out.

 mike
28.726You got that right, Mike. Nuthin's ever easy...CRBOSS::DERRYLooks like I'm going Republican...Wed Oct 03 1990 09:321
    
28.727Boggs aint clutch either.KEPNUT::DIGGINSWed Oct 03 1990 09:5712
    
    Figures. I went to the game last night. It was the most important sox
    game I have ever attended and they were the best seats I ever had,
    lower box, sec 75, 8 rows from the field. AND THE STIFF MORGAN BRINGS
    IN DENIIS LAMP!!!!!!! ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
    Neddless to say they lost with Lamp giving up the game winning hits.
    Oh well what should have I expected anyway!! At least the seats were
    free, and the game was exciting. Ugh..
    
    
    
    Steve
28.728ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Oct 03 1990 10:006
    
    
    re: -1
    
    Yeah... and when Morgan went to the mound to talk to Lamp,
    the fans were screaming to leave him in... 
28.729SALEM::DODANo scalping at Sinead O'Connor concertsWed Oct 03 1990 10:033
...because Murphy was warming up.

daryll
28.730Oh were you there too? KEPNUT::DIGGINSWed Oct 03 1990 10:059
    
    Not from where I was sitting! The fans were screaming not to put
    in the ultimate stiff....Rob Murphy. You should of heard the 
    bleacher crew moan when he got up in the pen! Poor guy.
    
    
    
    
    Steve
28.731???MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Wed Oct 03 1990 11:085
    
    What's the matter with Reardon?
    
    Bob V.
    
28.732CAM::WAYHappiness is a loose ruckWed Oct 03 1990 11:1928
Rob "The Caterer" Murphy....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


I know what's going to happen.  It came to me in a dream....

There I was, standing on a grassy knoll, this bright light surrounding
me.  (No, there weren't any dead relatives!)

This voice says to me "Choose wisely", and then shows me two things.
The first is Elle MacPherson.  The second is the Red Sox in a playoff
game against Toronto.  

So, I'm standing there, pondering this really tough decision, and 
finally, I figure that even if I choose the Sox, there's no way they'll
ever win the Series....  why do I say that?  Because over on the next
hill, another voice is talking to Bill Buckner, saying "choose wisely"
and I hear old Billy Buck talking about the Sox...

So I says to myself, go with Elle.  

So I pick Elle, and as we prepare to ride off into the sunset, I 
glance back at the Red Sox game just in time to see Junior F***ing Felix
putting the game winner outta the park...

You have my word on it....


Chainsaw
28.733COBRA::DINSMORESee ya in Tampa in January!Wed Oct 03 1990 11:2712
    From:	AXIS::ROBICHAUD    "Donald J. Robichaud ML 5-5/E72 Ext 3-7111"  3-OCT-1990 10:27
To:	MSBOS::DINSMORE
Subj:	

	Personally I hope there's a playoff game so Roger can pitch a
9 inning shutout and shut you, Mike, Groaner etc. up for the rest of the year.

				/Don
    
    whats this  /don???
    
28.734AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Wed Oct 03 1990 11:299
    Hasn't Jacoby been relegated to 1B?
    
    Well Mike, with your admission that you don't follow baseball much I can
    now understand why you say some of the things you do ;^}.
    
    Your fishing trip would be screwed up by a playoff game?!?  Just think
    what this does to the Sox rotation should they meet the A's.  Boddicker
    is pitching tonight and Clemens is pencilled in for the playoff game. 
    That means that they both might have to pitch on 3 days rest.
28.735AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sWed Oct 03 1990 12:036
    	Posting mail without my permission eh Dinz?  I always knew you
    were a lowlife.  But I'll stand by what I said.  If there is a playoff
    game Clemens will pitch the game of his life, and MikeC will call
    it a semi-clutch win.
    
    				/Don
28.736they'll win tonightCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meWed Oct 03 1990 12:304
No Don I'd give him a clutch win but I doubt he'd get it. ;^)

but I really don't see it happening either....
28.737DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Wed Oct 03 1990 12:4112
    Hmmm, perhaps last night may be the start of something new......
    
    
    
    
    Digger's KOD!!!  
    
    Stay home, Digger!
    
    :*)
    
    Lee
28.738GOOBER::ROSSAnd baby makes fourWed Oct 03 1990 13:0417
What hurts the Sox most is two things:

	Greenwell and Burks swinging at the first pitch late in the game
	Quintana's lack of speed getting down the line on DP grounders

I think the Sox should seriously consider switching the batting order 
around tonight.

  Boggs, Reed, Greenwell, Burks, Brunansky, Evans, Pena, Quintana, Rivera

The White Sox are an interesting team... I think they will drop back some
next year because they've been too good in one run games this year.  I like
the ChiSox outfield of Calderon, Johnson, Sosa {if he could hit .280, he'd
put up numbers like Ruben Sierra last year}.  Ventura has a fantastic arm
{as we saw on that foul ball throw he made}.  Frank Thomas looks like a
sure thing.  1991 will be a readjustment year because everyone will be ready
for them.  1992 might be a title year.
28.739Gotta take 'em tonightBUILD::MORGANWed Oct 03 1990 14:1421
    Ya gotta like those ChiSox uniforms.
    
    But on to more important matters.  I don't think you'll see any changes
    in the batting order tonight, Doug.  The manager isn't swift enough to
    think that change can sometimes create good things.  I'm not saying he
    should change the order at this point in the season, but he's pretty
    much gone with the same thing since the All-Star break, give or take
    throwing Marshall in there on occassion.
    
    Greenwell's biggest flaw at the plate is his lack of patience.  
    
    We won't be seeing Clemens until game 3 of the ALCS if there's a
    playoff game tomorrow.  We might not even see Boddicker in games 1 or 2
    should the Sox make it.  It'll depend on how long he has to go tonight.
    If they can win tonight they'll have two days off to rest Anderson and
    Reardon.
    
    Dana Kiecker just might be opening up the ALCS on Saturday night. 
    Howzat grab ya?
    
    					Steve  
28.74012354::J_HALPINThe Delaware: river, bay or ocean???Wed Oct 03 1990 14:2510

	Can anybody give me a reasonable explaination on why Gray was pulled
after pitching two perfect innings??? I know he is has been used for short
releif all year but the way he pitched the top of the 10th (Other than that
one pitch to Fisk <shudder>) I would have brought him back to start the 11th,
and pulled him after he gave up his first hit!!!

JimH

28.741AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sWed Oct 03 1990 14:5314
28.74212354::J_HALPINThe Delaware: river, bay or ocean???Wed Oct 03 1990 15:097

	/Don, That the only answer I could come up with. I was hoping maybe
there was another reason :-(

JimH

28.743REFINE::ASHEHomey don't play that...Wed Oct 03 1990 15:222
    I wish the BoSox lost tonight on a Minnie Minoso HR.... sigh, thanks
    Fay-baby....
28.745tonight's a must win in more than 1 way...FDCV07::GARBARINOWed Oct 03 1990 15:3516
>    We won't be seeing Clemens until game 3 of the ALCS if there's a
>    playoff game tomorrow.  We might not even see Boddicker in games 1 or 2

Boddicker would have to pitch on 3 days rest to make Game 2 of the ALCS.
If there's a playoff game, and Clemens needs 4 days rest between starts,
Clemens only possible starts in the ALCS would be games 3 and 7.

I thought the Red Sox only chance against Oakland was if Clemens pitched
3 of the 7 games, but that would require that he pitch on 3 days rest
twice.  Given his recent shoulder problems, that's probably not likely.

They most likely will need 3 of 4 at home (they're lucky to have the
home field advantage in the AL East this year) to take it.


Joe
28.746WMOIS::JBARROWSHit the ice and score the winner!Wed Oct 03 1990 23:301
    Red Sox clinch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
28.747WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu Oct 04 1990 09:013
       Anyone notice we have the same 4 teams in the playoffs that were
    there in 1975! And Oakland as defending champeens.
                                    Denny
28.748STARVU::MACGREGORDECview3D engineer - DTN 287-3318Thu Oct 04 1990 09:076
    Boston clinced with a 3-1 victory last night, while Toronto lost
    3-2 just five minutes later.  It has been announced that Dana Kiecker
    will pitch Game 2 of the ALCS, Boddicker Game 3.  Greg Harris will
    pitch Game 4 if Clemens can't come back after Game 1.
    
    The Wizard
28.749AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Oct 04 1990 09:175
    	Prediction:
    
    	Dinz and Wardle will jump on the Oakland bandwagon.
    
    				Nostra/DONus
28.750Bring on dem A's.KEPNUT::DIGGINSThu Oct 04 1990 09:5210
    
    Congrats to the Sox! I knew they'd do it all along! 
    
    
    
    ya right!
    
    
    
    Steve
28.751I woke up and everything was OK!!! I think?12354::J_HALPINThe Delaware: river, bay or ocean???Thu Oct 04 1990 10:0015


	Last night, with 2 outs in the ninth, nobody on, and and 0-2 count all
I could think of was Calvin Schaldi (sp?) pitching to Gary Carter in '86!!! I 
jumped up and yelled at the TV, "HEY REARDON, DON'T THROW A MEATBALL DOWN
THE MIDDLE OF THE PLATE!!!". Too late.... hanging curve ball - line drive single
into centerfield, a hit batsman, and a long drive to right field... 
arrggghhh... Stephen King is in the stands, He was interviewed on TV before
the game... ohhhhh nnnnoooo!!!!!!.... 


	THANK YOU TOM BRUNANSKY!!!!

	JimH :-)
28.752WMOIS::JBARROWSHit the ice and score the winner!Thu Oct 04 1990 10:072
          From the mail I received this morning, Dinz has already
          jumped on the Oakland Bandwagon!
28.753MCIS1::DHAMELBelieve!!!Thu Oct 04 1990 10:319
    
    The Stephen King interview was pretty funny.  He was asked if he were
    there to write a story about the Sox, and he replied something like
    "Hmmmm... No....but all my stories *do* have happy endings...." and
    then he grinned into the camera and fluttered his eyebrows in his best
    Bugs Bunny 'ain't I a stinkah' impersonation.
    
    Dickster
    
28.754Congrats to the SoxMPO::MCFALLHe was born a pauper to a pawnThu Oct 04 1990 10:535
	Congrats to the Sox for winning 88 games. To their credit, they
beat the team they had to beat 10 out of 13 times. They deserve this
pennant simply for that.

	Jim M
28.75520-20 hindsight in calling the big games for Sox ffansHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERNuke the New Kids!!Thu Oct 04 1990 11:309
    >If there is a playoff
    >game Clemens will pitch the game of his life, and MikeC will call
    >it a semi-clutch win.                            
    
    Yeah, but now that he's pitching game 1 of the Oakland series, if he
    loses to Stewart, /Don and the crowd will be saying it wasn't a big
    game.
    
    Dan
28.756AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Oct 04 1990 11:383
    	It will be a *big* game win or lose Mr "Closet Pirates Fan".
    
    				/Don
28.757TORREY::MAY_BRThu Oct 04 1990 11:536
    re .755
    
    and if he wins wwe'll here you and Mike Childs say it wasn't a clutch
    game.  Did you know that Don Mattingly has never won a big game?
    
    Bruce
28.758I'll even eat crow if it makes you happyCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meThu Oct 04 1990 11:585
 No Bruce, you'll here me say it's about time that he finally delievered
 and actually pitched up to all the hype....

 mike
28.759It's /Don & gang who waffles on big games. Not me.HOTSHT::SCHNEIDERNuke the New Kids!!Thu Oct 04 1990 12:126
    >and if he wins wwe'll here you ... say it wasn't a clutch
    >game. 
    
    On what flawed logic do you base that?
    
    Dan
28.760AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Oct 04 1990 12:134
28.761AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Oct 04 1990 12:233
28.762Is it a sign that the curse is over?AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Thu Oct 04 1990 12:247
    The St. Louis Cardinals finished in last place in the NL East this
    season.
    
    The last time that happened, the Boston Red Sox defeated the Pittsburgh
    Pirates in the World Series - the year was 1918.
    
    What the heck, it's as crazy as the Curse of the Bambino
28.763WMOIS::JBARROWSHit the ice and score the winner!Thu Oct 04 1990 13:129
28.765COBRA::DINSMOREGo OaklandThu Oct 04 1990 13:363
    Ha..  keep reaching for little scenarios.. back in  blah, blah,
    blah
    
28.766Dropped Last Out???CSC32::J_HENSONIt's just the same, only differentThu Oct 04 1990 13:4418
I've been reading this confernce for a while, but have never wrote into
it.  Well, now there's a question that I want answered but no one else
has asked it.  So, here goes.

I watched the last inning of last night's game on ESPN.  When Brunanski
made the sliding catch for the last out, the ESPN announcer said that
he dropped the ball, but that it was called out anyway.  I kept waiting
for a definitive replay, but it never came.  And after a few minutes,
everyone seemed to forget it.

Am I the only one who heard this???  Did he drop the ball, or did the
announcer just stick his foot in his mouth?  From what I saw, it looked
like a catch to me.  However, the tail end of the play was obscured by
the stands.

Comments?

Jerry
28.767FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu Oct 04 1990 13:466
    The initial confusion came because the umpire initially signalled fair
    ball instead of calling an out.  It was down deep in the right field
    corner and Brunansky was on the ground, so it was unclear at first what
    had happened.
    
    John
28.768Air out those Sox....TALLIS::STEVENSONLinda StevensonThu Oct 04 1990 13:5013
    
    Hi Jerry,
    
    I watched the game on Channel 38 last night and the announcer said that
    Brunanski caught the ball, but we couldn't see it because of the
    fans...
    
    Sherlock
    
    PS. Who is sitting through a day of misery listening to the Dinz and
        how Oakland will CRUSH them.... I'm thinking of making another bet
        with him !!!  
    
28.769DECWET::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Thu Oct 04 1990 13:5510
In the Sox conference it was mentioned that he caught the ball but got up and 
chased after his hat before the crowd grabbed him/it. It looked from the camera
angle that he was chasing after the ball...

ESPN then compounded the situation by showing the home plate umpire looking
out into right field like he was going to overturn the call.


Metz
28.770MCIS1::DHAMELBelieve!!!Thu Oct 04 1990 14:5229
    
    Getting back to Stephen King, fans will know that he always mentions
    the Red Sox somewhere in his horror stories, sorta like Alfred
    Hitchcock would make subtle appearances in his own films.  Some of
    King's less subtle allusions to the Red Sox have been:
    
    "The Dead Zone" -  Life in the Red Sox front office.
    
    "Firestarter"   -  Life in the Red Sox bullpen.
    
    "The Stands"    -  Self-explanatory
    
    "It"            -  Allegorical allusion to the sale of Babe Ruth.  "It"
                       keeps coming back to to haunt them.
    
    "Cujo"          -  Dog goes on mad rampage after getting hit with a
                       bat; contracts deadly "pennant fever."
    
    "Yawkey's Lot"  -  Blood-sucking owners prey on unsuspecting fans.
    
    "Carrie"        -  A telekinetic causes baseballs to mysteriously fly
                       into net, past catchers, and through first-baseman's
                       legs.
    
    "Misery"        _  Life as a Red Sox fan.
    
    
    Dickster
    
28.771AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Oct 04 1990 15:401
    
28.772Bruno for guvna...CURIE::WENTZELLPennant Fever sets in....Thu Oct 04 1990 16:1012
RE: The Catch

I was sitting on top of the centerfield wall (in section 35).  From there is 
was OBVIOUS that Bruno CAUGHT the ball.  He went into his slide, I held my 
breath (actually, I don't think I had taken a breath since Reardon hit the 
previous batter), and watched the ball fall into his glove, which he 
immediately held up in the air.  Then he started fumbling for his hat, which I 
think some lucky fan wound up with.

It was amazin'!

Scott
28.773A fitting end to Dan's nightmare baseball seasonGOOBER::ROSSAnd baby makes fourThu Oct 04 1990 16:245
The greatest thing about last night's win was that during the last 
two innings, if I closed my eyes just slightly, I could see  Dan
Schneider was closing the door on the White Sox, leading the Boston to the
AL East crown.   A shudder of perverse pleasure went thru me....

28.774COBRA::DINSMOREGo OaklandThu Oct 04 1990 17:1211
    doug, 
    
    where have ya been?  Did ya notice  Don  Mattinglys batting average
    
    
    since he came ogg injured list?
    
    
    
    dinz
    
28.775Yes, Football season started early but...HOTSHT::SCHNEIDERNuke the New Kids!!Thu Oct 04 1990 17:5310
28.776just a questionCOBRA::DINSMOREGo OaklandFri Oct 05 1990 10:053
    Whens the last time  Clemens won a big playoff  game?
    
    dinz
28.777back problems will cut his power outputGOOBER::ROSSAnd baby makes fourFri Oct 05 1990 10:0612
>               <<< Note 28.774 by COBRA::DINSMORE "Go Oakland" >>>
>    doug, 
>    where have ya been?  Did ya notice  Don  Mattinglys batting average
>    since he came ogg injured list?
>    dinz
    
I've been at a customer site for the past month with only occasional access
to the net.

Yes, I noticed.   I also noticed that Wade Boggs had more HR over the
same period {1}.   Don Mattingly - a Punch n' Judy slap hitter.  Just
doesn't have the same ring to it as "best player in baseball".
28.779DELNI::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 05 1990 10:167
    
    > Whens the last time  Clemens won a big playoff  game?
    
    1986.
    
    glenn
    
28.780COBRA::DINSMOREGo OaklandFri Oct 05 1990 10:555
    
    thanks glenn
    
    dinz
    
28.781When's the last time NY played a Playoff game?SALEM::DODANo scalping at Sinead O'Connor concertsFri Oct 05 1990 11:196
               <<< Note 28.776 by COBRA::DINSMORE "Go Oakland" >>>
                              -< just a question >-

  >  Whens the last time  Clemens won a big playoff  game?
    
    Are there any playoff games that aren't BIG?
28.782COBRA::DINSMOREGo OaklandFri Oct 05 1990 11:200
28.783AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sFri Oct 05 1990 11:378
28.784WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Oct 05 1990 11:402
       Anyone know who the Yanks play this weekend?
                                     Denny
28.785MPO::ST_ONGEFri Oct 05 1990 11:495
    Re: .784
    
    With themselves ;-)
    
    John
28.786Boggs Believes, but calls Margo just in case :^)MPO::MCFALLHe was born a pauper to a pawnFri Oct 05 1990 11:5511
>    Re: .784
    
>    With themselves ;-)
    
	    John, remember, I know where you sit :^)
	Dinz, why are you egging on these Sox fans? Most of us Yankee
fans would like to sidle off quietly into the offseason, licking our
wounds, and hoping that Gene Michael and George Bradley don't mortgage
the farm system with questionable trades this offseason :^)

	Jim M
28.787COBRA::DINSMOREGo OaklandFri Oct 05 1990 11:579
    jim m,
    
    As i told Daryll in mail, its a valid question, guess my  so called
    
    reputation in here, follws me again down devils way
    
    
    dinz
    
28.788SALEM::DODANo scalping at Sinead O'Connor concertsFri Oct 05 1990 12:077
Never said it wasn't a valid question. It did have a "?" at the 
end didn't it?

It's just that I have a hard time believing that you asked it 
just out of curiosity....

daryll
28.789AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sFri Oct 05 1990 13:011
    	Dinz you should've remembered anyway, you were a Sox fan then...
28.790punching the wallWAV14::LEARYMFri Oct 05 1990 13:1412
    Hope St. Roger's hand is ok after punching the wall in Joe M,organ's
    ofc on Tuesday night. Seems that Mr.Articulation was upset that the
    players would not get a 30 minute privare celebration(Commish only
    allows 15 min.)
    
    Asked if he had reprimanded Clemens,Joe Morgan replied sic, "Didn't
    have to,the wall did!"
    
    However,he's still a great pitcher as long as he keeps his mouth shut.
    
    Go Sox
    
28.791Break Up The A'sSHALOT::HUNTWyld Stallyns RulesMon Oct 08 1990 13:028
    Boy, you can hear a pin drop in this note today.
    
    Thud, crash, bang ...
    
    The Sox are overmatched, outmanned, outgunned, and overwhelmed.  And
    the National League winner is merely next in line.
    
    Bob Hunt
28.792The fat lady is clearing her throat..KEPNUT::DIGGINSMon Oct 08 1990 14:068
    
    You said it Bob, the sox have GLARING weaknesses that are really 
    showing in this series. I thought they would hit better tho'.
    They need a good performance out of Boddicker to save face.
    
    
    
    Steve
28.793PNO::HEISERultimate, underlyin', no denyin' motivationMon Oct 08 1990 15:174
    The Sox have an advantage with Boddicker facing Moore, but I'm not
    convinced that Boston's offense can outproduce Oakland's offense!
    
    Mike
28.794FDCV07::GARBARINOMon Oct 08 1990 18:0914
>       Anyone know who the Yanks play this weekend?

Anyone know if the Sox played this weekend ?  I sure as hell didn't see 'em. :^)

Seriously, Game 1 was so big for them.  Now they have 5 left (maybe), and
Clemens will appear only once, and Boddicker twice.  Meanwhile, the A's
could pitch Stewart twice and Welch once (they would be back-to-back
if the series returns to Boston).  If it goes 7, Stewart and Welch will
appear 5 times, Clemens and Boddicker four times.  Clemens' arm problems,
and Boddicker having to pitch the last game of the season really hurt
Boston's chances.


Joe
28.79572 GONGS..."still gong-ing, and gong-ing"FDCV07::GARBARINOThu Oct 11 1990 10:495
I really didn't want to do this, but when I asked myself, "would Boston
fans be as gracious if the Yanks got swept ?", the answer was always "NO".


Joe
28.796didn't wanna do this either...SHIRE::FINEUC1Thu Oct 11 1990 12:4010
Well, Joe, I didn't want to do this either, but I recall writing in here that
after giving everything they had to squeak by the Jays, the Red Slobs would
role over and play dead for the As and that the Jays would have given the As a 
much better series....

Oh well, the mighty Jays broke the attendance record by a long way (never saw
it mentioned in here by the way - hmmm, interesting) and that will perhaps
be more rememberable.  What a sports town TO is!

rick ellis
28.797AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers...Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Oct 11 1990 12:557
    	If the Jays had given the Red Sox a better series a couple of
    weekends ago they would've played the A's.  I think I've finally
    figured out the Doc.  After next year the chances of Roger pitching
    in *HOUSTON* are pretty good.  Doc is just laying the groundwork
    early.
    
    				/Don
28.798And the games weren't as tightDELNI::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 11 1990 13:036
    
    Yeah, and the Jays gave them a *much* better series last year, too.
    (I know, I know, they did win *one* game.)
    
    glenn
    
28.799J's vs A's = Sox vs A'sCURIE::WENTZELLLooks like rain...Thu Oct 11 1990 13:4316
How anyone can say the Jays would have given the As a better series is beyond 
me.  Obviously the Jays couldn't even do what it took to get there. They lost 2
of 3 to the Sox then 2 of 3 to the Os down the stretch.  The Sox vs. Jays would 
be a good series (could go either way), the As vs. American League East is a 
blowout IMO.  

I'll be interested to see how well the NL Champ does against the As pitching, 
especially given the fact that they haven't faced each other during the season. 
And I'd be willing to bet LaRussa and company are just loving the scouting 
opportunity they are being given by a long(er) NLCS.

Well, time to utter that familiar phrase that should be a New England sports 
trademark - "Just wait 'till next year!"

Scott

28.800the serious baseball talk doesn't take place hereDECWIN::JARETH::YANKOWSKASThu Oct 11 1990 13:579
    re .796:
    
    >  Oh well, the mighty Jays broke the attendance record by a long way
    >  (never saw it mentioned in here by the way - hmmm, interesting)
    
    Rick, see topic 163 in ASABET::BASEBALL.
    
    
    py
28.801ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 11 1990 17:094
    
    Have the Sox ever won a playoff game that Clemens started?  
    Does anyone know what the team record is in playoff (ALCS and WS)
    games started by Roger Clemens?
28.802does anybody CARE??????????????PFSVAX::JACOBCain Tudj DisFri Oct 12 1990 00:005
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
28.803WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Oct 12 1990 09:294
       Since diviaional play started in 1969, EVERY TEAM BUT ONE has
    finished ahead of all teams in it's div. The ONLY exception is:
    The Indians have NEVER finished ahead of the Red Sox.
                                                Denny
28.804SHIRE::FINEUC1Fri Oct 12 1990 09:5818
>>                <<< Note 28.800 by DECWIN::JARETH::YANKOWSKAS >>>
>>             -< the serious baseball talk doesn't take place here >-

Thanks py,

I noticed that the serious baseball talk does not take place here, in fact no
serious talk takes place here whatsoever, which is why I do my noting here. ;^)

Anyway, I can't imagine why I put that note in as I usually can't stand it
when people say so-and-so would have given a better game/series to so-and-so.

Fack is, /Don had it right a few notes ago:  Jays had they're /chance during 
the big confrontation in Fenway a few weeks ago, and they blew it. 

'nuff said

have fun,  rick ellis

28.805A couple moreCOGITO::HILLFri Oct 12 1990 12:574
    re .803
    The Texas Rangers and Seattle Mariners are the only other Major league
    teams that have never won a divisional title. Everyone else (both
    leagues) has won at least once.
28.806ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Sat Oct 13 1990 11:206
    
    .803
    
    Thank you for answering my question.  Roger Clemens can NOT win the big
    game.  PERIOD!
    
28.807SALEM::DODAFryar &amp; Dykes : Twin GeeksMon Oct 15 1990 10:4613
    <<< Note 28.806 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
    .803
    
   > Thank you for answering my question.  Roger Clemens can NOT win the big
   > game.  PERIOD!
    
   Clemens was the winner of Game 7 in the 1986 ALCS.

   Hope this helps.

   daryll
   

28.808You've got to at least try, to fail...DELNI::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 15 1990 10:5419
    
    > Thank you for answering my question.  Roger Clemens can NOT win the big
    > game.  PERIOD!
    
    He won a couple of big ones this year, most notably the game against
    Toronto that for all intents sealed the division title (which is all
    the Sox were realistically going to win this year with this team).  I
    was there and it was quite a thrill to see it.  Even the national media
    thought it was quite a heroic effort. 
    
    Unfortunately, if you're a Cleveland Indians fan born after 1960, you
    haven't seen your team in a big game in your *lifetime* (Indians have
    not even finished within 10 games of the leader since 1959).  I can't
    imagine what that might feel like, and wouldn't want to know either.  
    But at least none of the players can be accused of not coming through 
    in the big ones, so I guess they're not chokers...
    
    glenn
    
28.809ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Oct 15 1990 13:555
    
    Bottom line, regardless of how you try to pan off Clemens inability 
    to win the big game on the Indians, Clemens is not a big game pitcher.
    Sure, he'll get you to the playoffs, but then its good night... as
    he becomes subpar W/L wise in games he starts...
28.810I think Greenwall is to BLAM (tm)CNTROL::CHILDSone nine hundred YT GuiltMon Oct 15 1990 14:385
 and he's now 7-1 lifetime against Stewart. Think he has nightmares of Big
 Dave?

 mike
28.811Play with numbers all you want, on a *team* the man will winDELNI::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 15 1990 14:4418
                                 
    > Sure, he'll get you to the playoffs, but then its good night... as
    > he becomes subpar W/L wise in games he starts...
                 ^^^^^^
    Subpar as compared to what?  The Red Sox are .000 in playoff games
    against the A's with and without Clemens.  You can't go lower than 
    that.
    
    Even still, I will admit that Clemens has not excelled in postseason 
    play.  He's been hot and cold.  As a matter of fact, his record is very 
    similar to another Texan's, Nolan Ryan.
    
    I still say that if someone (it may not even be the Red Sox) puts half 
    a team around the guy in the 90's, he'll carry them to the division
    title and then with some support (no one wins alone) all the way.
    
    glenn
    
28.812can't win the big one tag is bullMFGMEM::MIOLAPhantomMon Oct 15 1990 16:0816
    
    
    This Clemens can't win in the playoffs is a joke.
    
    WHAT IS HIS ERA?
    
    He lost the 1'st game 1-0 on a run that he didn't allow.......
    boy he stinks.
    
    This last game he did give up 3 runs, but two came in on a double from
    a cold pitcher.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, Roger has been very effective, its always
    been the bats and relievers that have been the trouble.
    
    Lou
28.813Your basic dishonest ::SPORTS treachery...DELNI::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 15 1990 16:3616
    > To the best of my knowledge, Roger has been very effective, its always
    > been the bats and relievers that have been the trouble.
    
    Hence Mr. Gronowski's shady wording of the question:  What is *his
    team's* record in postseason games Clemens has started (because Clemens 
    himself has been neither good or bad, just around average overall)?  
    Missing in the answer is the fact that once each in the '86 ALCS 
    (Schiraldi), '86 World Series (Schiraldi again), '88 ALCS (Lee Smith), 
    and '90 ALCS (Larry Andersen/et al) Clemens has pitched very fine 
    games in which the bullpen blew the game.  Most champions have had good
    bullpens to sew these kind of games up, but since Clemens doesn't and 
    hasn't been able to pitch nine innings in each, he's a choker.
    
    glenn
    
28.814RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe 24 Hour Church of ElvisMon Oct 15 1990 17:088
    Glenn,
    
    I thought Clemens' ERA was 4.10 in post season - considerbly higher
    than his regular season ERA.  He's pitched well, but hasn't been
    the post season performer of say, Dave Stewert, who's ERA has dropped
    in the post season.
    
    JD
28.815CAM::WAYBeaten like a redheaded stepchild...Mon Oct 15 1990 17:1920
Personally, I've always felt that putting the total burden on the
pitcher in *any* game is kind of going overboard.

I've seen pitchers who didn't have their stuff who were covered by
superb fielding (excepting numerous meatballs which are put outta the
park), and I've seen pitchers who were doing really well get killed
by errors in the field.

Baseball is a team sport.  Yes, the pitcher handles the ball more
than anyone else, but even if he shuts out his opponents (throws
a perfect game) and his team produces no offense, you can still
end up out of the money.

People are bashing Roger because, unfortunately, he gives us some
reason to bash him.  But don't forget that there are 8 other guys
out there who help give up runs, and who don't produce at the
plate....

JMHO,
'Saw
28.816The Sox or anyone else could use more like himDELNI::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 15 1990 17:3016
    
    > He's pitched well, but hasn't been
    > the post season performer of say, Dave Stewert, who's ERA has dropped
    > in the post season.           
    
    Agreed.  I said he's only been average (two poor games in '86 did the
    ERA in), but he's pitched some very good games that have been lost to
    history.  My only point is that he has not been this "big-game choker"
    many have made him out to be.
    
    I'm generally not prone to absolutes.  I think Stewart has proven he is
    the better pitcher year-in, year-out, but that should not detract from
    Clemens, not the least reason being the respective teams they play for.
    
    glenn

28.817mgmt is the problem... clem the scapegoat....CSCMA::TIBERIOMon Oct 15 1990 18:2814
    roger clemins is a GREAT pitcher....having said that i've exorcised
    all the demons of rcaso past....
    
    I'm so mad, let's try stream of consciousness stuff..
    
    he was pissed because mgmt didn't support the team.... goal
    incongruence...management wants to maximize $, players want to win...
    why didn't they bring up mo?  arbitration two yrs down the road.
    
    gutless wonders, gorman, yawkey and harrington.... they don't deserve
    to run a club. ... if i were clem i'd be pissed.  they put too much
    pressure on him by not getting another starter at the beg. of the
    year... cheap prix... morgan can't manage for squat.... got i hate
    sox mgmt. ....  now let me tell you how i really feel....
28.818ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Oct 16 1990 13:365
    
    re: .810
    
    Must be a typo mike... Clemens in NOT 7-1 lifetime v.s. Stewart!
    
28.819definate typo, probably due to braincrampCNTROL::CHILDSone nine hundred YT GuiltTue Oct 16 1990 17:031
28.820STAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in 1991Wed Oct 24 1990 17:075
    It was just reported in the Red Sox notes conference that the Sox have
    decided not to renew the contract of Dwight Evans.
    
    
    py
28.821MCIS1::DHAMELBan orange pumpkin garbage bagsWed Oct 24 1990 17:159
    
    I don't believe that after 18(?) years with the club that they're just
    going to unceremoniously dump him a la Jim Rice.  Did they offer him
    the chance to retire?  Did he refuse a trade?  I just don't get it.
    Something tells me there's going to be a lot more to this story, and
    it's probably ugly.
    
    Dickster
    
28.822sad to say, but losers never changePNO::HEISERIbanez: the axe built to blast!Wed Oct 24 1990 18:061
    
28.823He may not have a ring, but Dwight Evans is a winner.....SASE::SZABOWed Oct 24 1990 18:181
    
28.824PNO::HEISERIbanez: the axe built to blast!Wed Oct 24 1990 18:299
>         -< He may not have a ring, but Dwight Evans is a winner..... >-
    
    sorry for the misunderstanding.  I was referring to the Red Sox
    organization.  Some front offices have 'loser' stamped on their
    foreheads and it carries down to the field.  
    
    A good house cleaning would be good for the Sox and Patriots.
    
    Mike
28.825I knew that!SASE::SZABOWed Oct 24 1990 18:341
    
28.826DECWET::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Wed Oct 24 1990 18:5224
Although Evans has been a good player for 18 years I can't find fault with
the management for not picking up his contract for next season. IMHO he should
either retire this off-season or he should have waited until after his back
surgery before he made demands on management if he wanted to stay a Sock.

He's damaged goods and he isn't a spring chicken. From what I've hear he
asked Sox management to make a decision now...I'm sure they would have invited
him to camp next season if he didn't pressure them to make a decision now.

If he can't hack it physically then he shouldn't be playing. The sox management
has a lot bigger problems to worry about then Dewey Evans. (this of couse 
assumes that they care about making the franchise a winner and not just a 
business that makes money....I haven't seen evidence to prove that they are
interested in doing anything other than making money)

If Evans wants to play next season he can either go to another team or ask them
to let him show up at camp and try and prove he deserves to be retained.

Ain't nothing like a player that refuse to let go after he can't physically
do the job any longer....


Metz
28.827PNO::HEISERIbanez: the axe built to blast!Wed Oct 24 1990 19:034
    Like so many other BoSox players before him, he'll go somewhere else
    and become better than he was!
    
    Mike
28.828AXIS::ROBICHAUDTexasChainsawSquareDanceMassacreThu Oct 25 1990 09:134
    	When asked if he would play for the Indians Evans said he didn't
    think so because he "wanted to play for a contender".
    
    				/Don
28.829The right thing..KEPNUT::DIGGINSThu Oct 25 1990 09:3111
    
    I think this was a good move for the Sox. It's too bad it had to 
    happen like this, but I feel it was the right move. Face it, Evans
    is 39 and is oft-injured. He would not relegate himself to a 
    non-starting role, not without alot of grief anyway, and his 
    supposed second-guessing of Morgan does not help the team in the
    least bit. Let's get some fresh horses out there and give them a 
    chance.
    
    
    Steve
28.830ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 25 1990 09:595
    
        When asked if he thought he'd have a better chance winning a
    World Championship for another team Evans said "Heck, they haven't
    won in Boston since 1918... how could my chances get any worse."
    
28.831Evans only man to homer off Olson in 1989STAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in 1991Thu Oct 25 1990 10:085
    I'm sure Gregg Olson isn't sorry to hear the latest news out of
    Boston...  :-)
    
    
    py
28.832My comments in RED_SOX: this *was* a positive move (unusual)NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 25 1990 10:2026
    
    The Red Sox made the right decision for perhaps the wrong reasons.  I 
    was actually somewhat surprised they did pull the trigger, not because
    I felt that Evans had enough left to warrant a return, but because he 
    has been such a fan favorite.  Given that this time the thing
    apparently was handled professionally to the satisfaction of both
    sides, I'm encouraged by the move and look forward to seeing some fresh
    talent.
    
    I feel privileged to have witnessed perhaps Evans' last great moments 
    in Fenway Park (where he did seem to come up with an inordinate number 
    of clutch plays) as a Red Sox, where he dismantled the Orioles in 
    Baltimore's Lost Weekend back in late June, even though I was rooting 
    for the other side.  I saved the Sunday Globe from the day after he hit
    the *two* come-from-behind home runs, figuring it would be the highlight 
    of the season.  Maybe it was.
      
    I don't feel that Evans merits Hall-of-Fame induction, though.  He just
    wasn't a consistently great enough offensive performer in what is
    firstly an offensive position, even though he was one of the great
    rightfielders of all time.  I'll go out on a limb and say that I'd vote
    for him in a minute over Jim Rice, though, even though Rice's peaks
    were higher.
    
    glenn
    
28.833CAM::WAYBeaten like a redheaded stepchild...Thu Oct 25 1990 11:0311
I will never forget my first game at Fenway Park.

I was in the right field seats, behind the foul pair in fair territory.
The first pitch of the game was hit LONG to right field.

Evans ran back, back, back, and made a little leap at the wall, arm
extended up, where the ball just kind of died in his glove.

It was, for me, one of the thrills of a lifetime.....

'Saw
28.834Good riddence to the last of the contry club BosoxWORDY::NAZZAROEight lbs of stupid in a 5 lb bagThu Oct 25 1990 12:0618
    Dwight Evans was the last of the crybaby whiners from the under-
    achieving Red Sox teams of the 70s and early 80s, the man for
    whom the phrase "25 cabs for 25 players" was coined.  Evans was
    always a backstabbing complainer of average talent who was blessed
    to play in Fenway for 18 years.  He never won a batting title,
    never won an RBI title, his only HR title was a tie in the strike
    season, he never hit higher than .305 and only hit over .300 once,
    he never had a 200 hit season.
    
    In sum, he was an average offensive player on perennially contending
    teams.  He was an excellent defensive player in the least difficult
    position on the field.  He had little speed, and was a below average
    baserunner.
    
    The Sox would have had to pay 1.6M for his services in 1991.  The
    decision to get him go was a no-brainer.
    
    NAZZ
28.835All of the great outfielders played center and rightNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 25 1990 12:106
    
    Right field the least difficult position on the field?  Try left field,
    followed by first base.
    
    glenn
    
28.836EARRTH::BROOKSStraight - no chaser ...Thu Oct 25 1990 12:163
    re .834
    
    So how do you REALLY feel about Evans Nazz ????
28.837ICODSP::LEFEBVREWondering where the lions areThu Oct 25 1990 12:296
    Nazz, although I agree with you concerning Evans' career, you're way
    off base with your assertion that right field is the easiest position
    in the field.  Left field, first base, and arguably, second base are
    all easier.
    
    Mark.
28.838someone had to pounce on thisMCIS1::DHAMELDyslexic worshipper of SantaThu Oct 25 1990 12:346
    
    Hey, 'Saw, who was the foul pair you sat behind?  Did they have B.O.?
    Bad breath?  Yankee fans??
    
    Just curious.
    
28.839CAM::WAYBeaten like a redheaded stepchild...Thu Oct 25 1990 12:5714
One had hair all over his back, and the other kept yelling about
someone sweating ;^)


re RF: 

As someone who has played all three OF positions, I would put forth
the premise that the hardest play in baseball to make is to 
cut down the runner going from 1st to 3rd, making the throw from
deep right field.

I would never rank RF as the easiest position to play....

'Saw
28.840ICODSP::LEFEBVREWondering where the lions areThu Oct 25 1990 13:554
    Slasher was the one wearing the fur coat.  I was the one accusing
    Chainsaw of sweating.
    
    Mark.
28.841Sad, but trueNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 25 1990 14:016
    
    Only in Boston would a player of Evans' stature be criticized on the
    event of his retirement.
    
    glenn
    
28.842PNO::HEISERIbanez: the axe built to blast!Thu Oct 25 1990 14:127
>    teams.  He was an excellent defensive player in the least difficult
>    position on the field.  He had little speed, and was a below average
    
    I always thought right field was one of the most difficult.  They have
    to make the longest throws in most parks.
    
    Mike
28.843Couldn't have been the NAZZ we know......SASE::SZABOThu Oct 25 1990 14:155
    Clearly, that was MrT(irade) who broke into NAZZ's account and trashed
    Dwight Evans' career.  NAZZ is a homeboy if I've ever seen one.  I
    mean, look at how much he adores Larry!  :-)
    
    Hawk
28.844Right fielders handle the fewest chances of any positionWORDY::NAZZAROEight lbs of stupid in a 5 lb bagThu Oct 25 1990 14:1615
    Just what is Evans' stature?  Why this sudden adolation?  His only
    redeeming quality is that he played 18 years for the same team.
    
    As far as right field beign the easiest position to play, in most
    parks left field would be easier, but not in Fenway.  And I can't
    believe someone actually said second base is easier to play than
    right field!!  You don't see many right fielders having to turn a
    double play!!!  Or for that matter, execute pickoffs, position 
    themselves properly for sutoff throws, cover the bag on steal attempts,
    and numerous other functions all the infielders must do every game
    while all three outfielders stand around and watch.  Please, any
    infield position is much more difficult to play than any outfield
    position.  And I stand by what I said about Evans.
    
    NAZZ         
28.845PNO::HEISERIbanez: the axe built to blast!Thu Oct 25 1990 14:175
    Sometimes people that have never played organized baseball think right 
    field is easy because, in pickup games, that's where they put all the 
    stiffs ;-)
    
    Mike
28.846Immense smiley goes hereWORDY::NAZZAROEight lbs of stupid in a 5 lb bagThu Oct 25 1990 14:223
    You know from personal experience, Mike?  
    
    NAZZ
28.847Brooks Robinson has nothing on me!PNO::HEISERIbanez: the axe built to blast!Thu Oct 25 1990 14:296
>    You know from personal experience, Mike?  
    
    That wasn't directed at you Nazz, but since you asked, I play third
    base.  Never played outfield in my life.
    
    Mike
28.849Couldn't tell from Gorman's doublespeakHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERVoted for whatsisname...Thu Oct 25 1990 14:4314
    >The Red Sox made the right decision for perhaps the wrong reasons. 
    
    You didn't elaborate on the wrong reasons, Glenn.  I see three sides to
    this, and their all very likely.
    
    * Evans production has declined and the Red Sox don't think he'll help
      them, especially considering his health.
    
    * He's one of the current "bad apples" that Morgan is looking to purge 
      in his quest to make the team docile and stupid in his own image.
    
    * $1.6M can be replaced by $100K rookie.
    
    Dan
28.850Wish they'd apply the same criteria to Joe MorganNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 25 1990 14:466
    
    The first was my "right" reason, the second and third the "wrong"
    reasons I suspect played a part in the Sox' decision.
    
    glenn
    
28.851ok KW?CNTROL::CHILDSLou Duffy's looking for change, spare changeThu Oct 25 1990 15:076
 but in the red soxs front office's minds #3 is the correct and most logical
 answer. Besides they can waste the 1.6 mil on Bruno cause he managed to hit
 a few timely HR's........

 mike
28.852EARRTH::BROOKSStraight - no chaser ...Thu Oct 25 1990 15:3215
    The Evans moves was the right one - in his prime, he was a hell of a
    player, and Nazz's criticisms aside, I can't see how anyone can dispute
    the fact that he was one of the outstanding defensive outfielders of
    his time. His own peers said as much.
    
    Yes, he should have been turned loose, I can only guess that he wants
    to play in the majors one more season, but the Sox can not afford to
    carry a 4th or 5th OF making $1.6M; it's that simple. 
    
    As far as backbiting Morgan, I'm in no position to say one way or the
    other. Clearly, that can not be tolerated. But I wonder how much Evans
    is in the minority ? It is obvious that the man can not handle a
    pitching staff, and I believe that the defection of Boddicker and Bruno
    (who needs to go elsewhere - the Toronto series aside, he was a bust)
    will speak volumes. Or at least a few pages ..... :-)
28.853Is too cheapHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERVoted for whatsisname...Thu Oct 25 1990 16:1110
    >but the Sox can not afford to
    >carry a 4th or 5th OF making $1.6M; it's that simple. 
    
    Hey Doc, this is a team that is making money hand over fist (MLB cable
    contract, local cable, gate, concessions, etc.) and that gouges its
    fans every chance it gets.  What exactly do you mean "can't afford"?
    It's certainly not the same usage as when I say, I can't afford that
    new Acura sports car!
    
    Dan
28.854Talk about selective memory...SALEM::DODAHorseshoes, handgrenades, A's Dynasty?Fri Oct 26 1990 12:3210
Sox have announced that they'd offer Evans an instructional 
position once he makes a decision on what he'll do next year.

Amazing that the same people that make Rice out to be a demi-god 
come in here and trash Evans.

At least when Dewey got the news he didn't go out like a whining
crybaby....

daryll
28.855EARRTH::BROOKSStraight - no chaser ...Fri Oct 26 1990 14:586
    Sorry darryl, but I don't remember anyone making Rice out to be a
    demi-god, usually it was the opposite.
    
    As far as 'whining' goes, I can't blam (tm) Rice for being bitter. This
    town treated him like s**t .... 'Dewey' was the demi-god  around here
    ...
28.856Journalistic integrity? What's that???WORDY::NAZZAROEight lbs of stupid in a 5 lb bagFri Oct 26 1990 16:2636
    Did anyone else barf on Peter Gammons' article in the Globe this
    morning?  His pathetic salnt on the truth disgusts me.  For 15
    years all we've heard from him and his ilk is that the Sox ran 
    a country club, that the inmates ran the asylum, the "25 cabs for
    25 players", and Evans was always fingered as one of the ringleaders
    of that bunch.  Gammons acknowledges as much in one paragraph of 
    the article.  the rest of the piece is spent feeling sorry for
    Dewey, and trashing management for letting him go, and bemoaning
    the fact that players no longer want to play in Boston.
    
    What a load of crap!!!  Who is supposed to be running t he team,
    Morgan and Gorman or the players?   Argue with Gorman's moves or
    lack of moves, question Morgan's strategy and his use of the bullpen,
    but please Gammons, don't pull a 180 on us and try to make us feel
    sorry for poor Dewey and the rest of those primadonnas.  The bullpen
    trying to show up Morgan at the end of the year was the ultimate lack
    of class.  Dewey trying to enlist Yaz as his personal hitting
    instructor was another sharp move.  
    
    The ultimate responsibilty for running this team does not rest with
    Dwight Evans, Marty Barrett, Rob Murphy, or any of the other overpaid
    adolescents.  The Red Sox are a business, and a profitable one.  The
    fallout of that fact is the basis for another discussion, but on a
    business level, releasing a 39 year old DH who can't bend over and
    was a disruption in the clubhouse was a no-brainer.  Especially when
    you want to give some PT to Mo Vaughn and/or Phil Plantier.  Do you
    think the Sox would have any chance of signing Brunansky if Dewey
    was still here?
    
    Gammons just makes me so mad.  He twists any situation to fit his
    particular whim of the day.  You can't have it both ways Peter.  Either
    Dewey is a clubhouse lawyer who is in the twilight of a good career, or
    he's a man wronged by a callous front office.  You can't tell us both
    stories and expect us to believe each of them.
    
    NAZZ
28.857MPO::GILBERTNo on 3 Yes on 5 Keep Mass. AliveFri Oct 26 1990 17:088
    
    I have to agree with Nazz regarding right field in Fenway Park.
    Left field is like playing ping pong on two sides. Center isn't
    alot better. All Dewey ever had to worry about was a certain corner
    in foul territory and staying out of the stands. His strong arm
    gave him the advantage in the 1st to 3rd situation but there are
    others who could have done as well.
    
28.858What if ???SHALOT::HUNTNo. 1 Ranked Virginia CavaliersFri Oct 26 1990 17:1214
28.859Fire Morgan. Keep Dewie!DOCTP::TESSIERDial a clicheFri Oct 26 1990 17:169
How ironic that on the day the Sox announce that they don't have
room for Evans on next year's team, the Elias Sports Bureau, whose
rankings of players is used by major league baseball to determine
a player's free agency rating (A,B,C), releases this year's
rankings by position and has Dwight Evans tied with Dave Parker
as the best DH in the league, and 42-year-old Carlton Fisk as the
best catcher in either league.  

Laker_Ken
28.860My 2 CentsUSCTR2::RBLOUNTYou Need A Mr MacAfee Speech!Fri Oct 26 1990 17:1920
    
    Re: .856
    
    Yeah, I read that too Nazz and wondered what the hell was going on. I
    expected to read how the Sox were continuing with their purge of "bad
    apples". Instead, it was a very pro Evans, anti-Morgan, anti-management
    article. Even so, I think Gammons makes some good points in the
    article. Like who do the Sox have to replace Dewie's bat? HR
    production, already low, will drop even further. An additional point
    was the Sox' lack of class in dealing with other loyal players in the
    past. Also, he points out managements lack of leadership in dealing
    with the players(exhibit A: Clemens). There must be something to the
    gist of what Gammons wrote because the Sox free agents have been real
    quick to leave when the opportunity arises.
    
    I think the problem of "clubhouse chemistry" continues. 
    
    JMHO
    
    Reb
28.8611990 was the first year Evans couldn't cut it NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 26 1990 17:2217
    
    > Which brings up a whole 'nother rathole.  Would Dewey have even been
    > around *this* long if there were no Designated Hitter ???
    
    Evans was playing a decent right field as late as 1989.  No DH would
    have cost him a few games, to be sure, but the current move would have
    come only at most one year before it did.
    
    Nazz, I read the Gammons article and came away not feeling that it
    vindicated Evans at Sox' management expense, but rather that the story
    really had very little to do with Evans at all.  It was a basic slam on
    management, most of which I happen to agree with.  In any case, we will
    soon see how accurate Gammons is with his assessment of what players
    think of the Boston Red Sox when the free agent season ends.
    
    glenn
    
28.862Sox' pitching staff just took a BIG hitSTAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Nov 21 1990 14:526
    Just read in both the Red Sox and Baseball notes conferences that the
    Kansas City Royals have signed Mike Boddicker....I don't know what the
    contract details are.
    
    
    py
28.863CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RWed Nov 21 1990 15:057
>    Just read in both the Red Sox and Baseball notes conferences that the
>    Kansas City Royals have signed Mike Boddicker....I don't know what the
>    contract details are.
    
    
     Three years, 9 million dollars ...

28.864MCIS1::DHAMELTake thee thy turkey and stuff itWed Nov 21 1990 16:1729
    
    (sigh) Doesn't anyone want to play in Boston anymore?  Bye-bye
    Bodlicker.
    
    But the good news is, I saw a blurb in the Woostah papah today that
    45-year old Jim Palmer is actually considering a comeback.  He was
    quoted as saying his arm felt better right now than it was when he left
    the game, and that he's been throwing three times a week.  Now there's
    a guy the Red Sox could go after. ;^0
    
    Funny thing is, with some of the signings we've seen lately, he could
    be offered more money than he ever made before in his career. 
    
    Does he get de-enshrined at the Hall of Fame if he plays again, and
    will he have to go through the waiting period for election all over
    again?
    
    Will this mean I can audition as the new spokesman for Haynes
    underwear?  Which reminds me of something I heard on the radio
    yesterday:
    
          "Do you have holes in your underwear?"
    
          "Why, no."
    
          "Then how do you get your legs in em?"   HAHAHAHAHAH
    
    Dickster, waiting for the holiday weekend to begin.
    
28.865CAM::WAYWiggle it, just a little bitMon Nov 26 1990 10:099
I've said it before, I'll say it again:

	Until the Red Sox get a *good* GM, and until the organization
	is willing to pay competitive money to the players, this
	team will never win the Big Enchilada.  They may flirt with
	the top in spite of themselves (cf. 1988, 1990), but they'll
	never make it...

'saw
28.866Championships are not the goal, $$$$$ is.BUILD::MORGANMon Nov 26 1990 13:5611
    The problem with the Red Sox isn't paying the big bucks.  They have one
    of the highest payrolls in MLB.  It's who they pay the big bucks to. 
    They give Barrett, Gedman, et al the millions they don't deserve. 
    That's where they're stupid.
    
    The problem is with the team's management.  Jean Yawkey and Haywood
    Sullivan haven't spoken to each other in years (nice way to run a
    business, huh?).  Yawkey pulls rank on Sullivan, and they pack 2.5
    million fans in a year.  She ain't gonna change nothing.  
    
    					Steve
28.867Hope she chokes on a turkey boneCOGITO::HILLMon Nov 26 1990 14:523
    Lets just hope the ol' hag kicks the bucket soon. 'Course us Sox fans
    have been wainting for that to happen for years, but only then will
    anything change
28.868CAM::WAYWiggle it, just a little bitMon Nov 26 1990 17:2017
Well, a similar situation existed with the New York Giants a few
years back.  The Maras had a falling out, and the team had
wallowed in really poor straits.

Rozelle stepped in, and the upshot was that George Young was made
GM and within a few years he (and Parcells and the coaching staff)
has turned the club around, with a Super Bowl win under their belts,
and a perennial contender.

Steve, you make a good point about the money going to the wrong people.
I'm just frustrated because I really don't see any plan to build this
team into a champion.  They let the good guys slip away, and what
they have really sucks....

Oh well, no one ever said being a Red Sux fan was easy 8^)

'Saw
28.869Anyone else hear this?SALEM::DODAMilli Vanilli=2 fat bald guys? Could be...Tue Nov 27 1990 17:287
Was in Maryland for Thanksgiving and my brother-in-law told 
me that the Balt. papers have been talking up a Dave Johnson/Bob 
Milacki for Mike Greenwell trade. 

First I'd heard of it....

daryll 
28.870hi neighborSTAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Nov 27 1990 17:4716
    re daryll:
    
    I've heard Greenwell to Baltimore rumors off and on since the season
    ended, but nothing concrete.  One source (forget who) supposedly quoted
    Gorman as saying that he wouldn't give up Greenwell for anything short of
    Ben MacDonald (yeah right, get a clue Lou).  
    
    I think the trade you mention makes sense both ways.  The Sox
    definitely need starting pitching with Boddicker gone, and the O's need
    an RBI man (and have enough pitching in the upper minors to sustain the
    loss of Johnson and Milacki).
    
    (btw, moving day is Dec. 8th)
    
    
    py
28.871It's getting out of handCELTIK::JACOBWe all become forefathers, by and byThu Dec 06 1990 13:5012
    I'm not trying to bash the Sox or anything, but this intrigued me.
    
    I heard on the radio the other day that the Red Sox signed some free
    agent pitcher for something like $7mil over three years.  Now the
    kicker is that the guy was something like 8-18 last year and missed the
    two previous seasons with elbow problems.  Just what is this guy
    supposed to have that makes him worth over 2 mil a year?????
    
    Beats me!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
28.872AXIS::ROBICHAUDDocker...Pant for |CENSORED|Thu Dec 06 1990 14:1016
28.873MCIS1::DHAMELIraqis roasting when we open fireThu Dec 06 1990 14:5317
    
    And when is Wes Gardner (the stiff) eligible for free agency?  Why
    should he stay with Boston and get pounded when he can go somewhere
    else and get pounded for kazillions of dollars?
    
    (AP)Boston
    The Red Sox today signed free agent pitcher Morton Dingleberry, a free
    agent 42 year old left hander.  "Dingles" made one career appearance
    with the Washington Senators, throwing four pitches, one of them for a
    strike.  Said Lou Gorman, "We feel that this is the one guy we need to
    bolster this staff.  His one strike and four ball record is somewhat
    deceiving, because I was told that at least two of those balls were
    really really close to the plate.  By today's market standards, we feel
    that the four-year $10 million price was worth it."
    
    Dickster
    
28.874Dingles, a lock for the Cy Young!KEPNUT::DIGGINSThu Dec 06 1990 14:596
    
    Dickster, I'm rooooling! HA HA!!! Dingles is GOD!
    
    
    
    Steve
28.875MPP6::MACNEALLife's 2 short 2 drink cheap beerThu Dec 06 1990 15:101
    Lookit the money guys like Bud Black and Zane Smith are getting.
28.876MPP6::CHILDSU can be happy, if U have mind tooThu Dec 06 1990 15:1810
 They also offered Welch 11 million for 3 years. I guess they figure they're
 going to loose Roger to be throwing this kind of money around instead of
 offering it to him...

 I loved the reasoning in the paper yesterday on the Young deal. Well all
 of our hitters fear him, he throws hard, he did have 3 shutouts last year,
 he'll be better on a contending club etc...hahahahaaaaa

mike
28.877EXSASE::SZABOThe Beer HunterThu Dec 06 1990 15:252
    DONGLES IS NO TOO BLAM!  SY YUNG HAD WON STRIEK TWO!  %^}
    
28.878MPP6::MACNEALLife's 2 short 2 drink cheap beerThu Dec 06 1990 15:3012
28.879MAc did you really say that?MPP6::CHILDSU can be happy, if U have mind tooThu Dec 06 1990 15:3713
    > Everyone knows the Sox won't be very competitive with
   >  Clemens, Young, and the rest.  
      ^^^^^^^

 Wow bad mouthing the King by the faithful? Must be the writers getting to
 you guys...hahaha just kidding

 but your point is well taken and makes sense but I have the feeling that
 Roger wants to go home to Texas more than play on a winner. I also think
 that he'd really go to Timbuktoo if they offered 2 million more a year
 than anyone else...

 mike
28.880MCIS1::DHAMELIraqis roasting when we open fireThu Dec 06 1990 15:4715
    
    And I'm sure the Red Sox organization can afford it, too.  Frankly, I
    feel that Welch will sign for more than that and for a longer term, but
    I'm sure his being in the rotation with Clemens must be some kind of
    incentive too.
    
    The next step is to then make Roger the highest paid pitcher in
    baseball.  Money doesn't always buy championships, but it's nice to see
    management get with the times and play the money game with the big
    boys.  Cripes, get us a world championship and the Sox will make more
    money than they ever made before, just on "Red Sox World Champions"
    paraphenalia and memorablelabia.
    
    Dickster
    
28.881CAM::WAYYour house'll smell like Hurl WhiffThu Dec 06 1990 16:0227
28.882why it would take 3 engineers to do my job...MPP6::CHILDSU can be happy, if U have mind tooThu Dec 06 1990 16:0811
 Saw if they paid you engineers what you're really worth we wouldn't need
 a layoff. Um excuse me transitional packages.

 you want to talk underpaid but over worked you're talking Technicians...

 Techs = God....

 many many smilies

mike
28.883CAM::WAYYour house'll smell like Hurl WhiffThu Dec 06 1990 16:1519
28.884UPWARD::HEISERsend an enemy a smoke alarm for Xmas!Thu Dec 06 1990 17:096
    RE: Mike & 'Saw
    
    If you follow DIGITAL at all, you'll know that many are telling the
    "officers" how it should be done.  Let's hope they're listening!
    
    Mike
28.885Right on brother..8^)KEPNUT::DIGGINSThu Dec 06 1990 17:497
    
    Mike, I couldn't agree with you more. Right on dude.
    Tech power.
    
    
    
    Steve
28.886HelpCELTIK::JACOBWe all become forefathers, by and byThu Dec 06 1990 18:197
    Somewhere back a few someone mentioned Zane Smith.  Did he sign with
    somebody and if so, who and for how much????
    
    Thanks
    
    JaKe
    
28.887MPP6::MACNEALLife's 2 short 2 drink cheap beerThu Dec 06 1990 18:214
    Oops, I can see how I could be misconstrued, Mike.
    
    What I meant is that with the supporting cast Clemens has now, even he
    won't be enough to carry the Sox to a champsheenship.
28.888MPP6::MACNEALLife's 2 short 2 drink cheap beerThu Dec 06 1990 18:242
    Jake, I don't think Zane has been signed by anyone yet, but he's being
    wooed by a few teams.
28.889DASXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Fri Dec 07 1990 08:299
    Dewey Evans signed with the Orioles for 1 year at $1M.  Not bad for
    someone his age, huh?
    
    Lee
    
    P.S. Hawk-Since I'm still a "kid" at 50, you can guess what that makes
    you!  :*)
    
    Lee
28.890Stayed with the Pirates.PSBUIN::MURRAYSRVFri Dec 07 1990 11:026
    
    	Zane Smith stayed in Pittsburg and signed a 4 year deal. Anyone
    	have any figures on the buckage ($$$) he got..
    
    			Thanks,
    			Dave.
28.891Zane SmithCELTIK::JACOBWe all become forefathers, by and byFri Dec 07 1990 11:544
    Zane Smith got 10.5 Million for 4 years from the Bucs.
    
    JaKe
    
28.892baseball is on the brink of a BIG declineSACT41::ROSSBlow me a kissThu Dec 20 1990 15:539
For what the Sox paid for Danny Darwin, Matt Young, and Jack Clark, 
couldn't they have gotten Gary Gaetti and Vince Coleman?   Maybe Gaetti
is determined to stay in Minnesota, but the Sox certainly could have
made a tempting offer.

Paying big buck, longterm contracts to guys like Darwin, Clark, and
Young is asinine.   I hope they finish last.


28.893ASABET::J_REIDBart Simpson for GovernorThu Dec 20 1990 16:593
    
    
    I didn't know Gaetti and Coleman could pitch...8')